Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 09/26/2017,•��1"�vNl�ugV�Y�,i'rbui , City of Corpus Christi Meeting Agenda - Final City Council 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 forward.cctexas.com Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. CITIZEN COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak to the City Council MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingles es limitado, habra un interprete ingles-espanol en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Mrs. Dorothy Dundas, Texas Apostolic Prayer Network. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Billy Delgado, Emergency Management Coordinator. D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. Proclamations / Commendations 1. 17-1232 Proclamation declaring September 29, 2017, "Corpus Christi IceRays Hockey Team's 20th Anniversary Season". Proclamation declaring September 30, 2017, "Coastal Bend Walk 'n Roll Celebration for Disability Awareness Day". Proclamation declaring October 3, 2017, "National Night Out". Proclamation declaring October 6, 2017, "Downtown Cultural District Day". Proclamation declaring October 8-14, 2017, "National Fire Prevention City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 Week". Swearing-In of Newly Appointed Board, Commission and Committee Members F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: a. OTHER G. MINUTES: 2. 17-1235 Regular Meeting of September 19, 2017 and Workshop Meetings of September 13 and 14, 2017. Attachments: Minutes-September 19, 2017 Minutes-September 13, 2017.pdf Minutes-September 14, 2017.pdf H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed, may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance,or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting,such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. J. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. Citizen comments are limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. City of Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 11) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. 3. 17-1094 Service Agreement for Document Scanning Services for Development Services Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with MCCi, LLC of Tallahassee, Florida for document scanning services based on the Local Government Purchasing Cooperative dba Buyboard for a total amount not to exceed $135,000. The term of this services agreement is for six months. Funds are budgeted in the Development Services Fund for FY 2016-2017. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Document Scanning Services Price Sheet-Document Scanning Services Service Agreement- Document Scanning Services Form 1295-Document Scanning Services 4. 17-1160 Engineering Testing Agreement for Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an engineering testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$138,900 for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. City of Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda'Final September 26,2017 Attachments: Agenda Mem Cefe Valenzuela Groundwater Monitor Project Budget C fe Valenzuela Groundwater Monitoring with f rmulas Form 1295 TWE Location Map Cef Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring Y 2017-2018 Presentation Cefe Valenzuela Groundwater Monitoring FY 201 -2018 5. 17-1164� Engineering Testing Agreement for J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 Motion authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, toexecute an engineering testing agreement with To|unay-VVong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$131,500 for the J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring F`y3O17-3O18. Attachments: AgendaMemo JC Elliott Groundwater Monitor ProLect__Budget_JC Elliott Groundwater MonitoringvVithformulas Locafion__Map_JC__E1Hott Landfill Groundwater Monito�IngFY2017-2018 Form 1295 TWE Presentation JC Elliott GroundwattLM2n��FY 2017-2018 6. 1[7-1149 Service Agreement for Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems atLandfills Resolution finding that the purchase and upgrade ofsoftware and equipment for the Solid VVaah* Department's scale ayatenla is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, bz execute aservice agreement with A,1 Scale Service, |no.. ofSan Antonio, Texas, for upgrades of the scale system software and equipment for a total amount not bzexceed $85.00O.00. with funding available inthe F`y3O1O-3O17General Fund. Attachments: Agenda Mem -Software and Eguipment Upgrades SW Scale Systems Lan fill Resolution Sole Source-Software and Eguipment Upgrades SW Scale System Price Sheet-Software and Eguipment Upgrades SW Scale Sys ems Landfills Form 1295-Software_and__Egu'ipment__Upgrades SW Scale SystemsLandfills 7' 1[7-1147 Service Agreement for Workers' Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services for one year at $132,OOOwith four one-year options and a total potential multi-year amount of$660,000. Motion authorizing the City Manager ordesignee toexecute aservice agreement with York Risk Services Group. Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey for workers' compensation third-party administrator services in accordance City v,Corpus ooueo Page Printed vnummumr City Council Meeting Agenda'Final September 26,2017 with Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 1133. based onbest value for atotal amount not bzexceed $133.00O. budgeted inFY3O17-18. The term ofthis agreement iafor one year with option bzextend for upbzfour additional one-year perioda, subject to the sole discretion of the Cib/, with a bzbs| potential multi-year amount ofup to $660,000. Attachments: Agenda Mem -Workers' Compensation TP Services Evaluation Matrix-Workers'Compensation TP Services.1 8' 1[7-1K020 Second Reading Ondinanom - Rmzoning property located at 1840 Saratoga Boulevard (1otReading 9/19/17) Case No. 0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley. A change of zoning from the ''RS-O^ Single-Family O District to the ''|L^ Light Industrial District. The property iadescribed aabeing Bohemian Colony Lands 6.378 acres out ofSection 7. Lot 5, located north of Saratoga Boulevard and east ofGreenwood Drive. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family District to the ''|L^ Light Industrial District. Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code (^UOC^), upon application bvBradley VV. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley Cox (^{}vvner"). by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Bohemian Colony Lands 6.378 acres out ofSec. 7. Lot 5, from the ''RS-O^ Single-Family O District to the ''|L^ Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for arepealer clause and publication. Attachments: Agenda Mem 0717-02 BradleLW. ShrieLand Valerie V. Ordinance 0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley ith Exhibits PP 0717-02 Bradley W Shirley a d Valerie V Shirley cc h Exhibits 9' 1[7-1K024 Second Reading Ondinanom - Rmzoning property located at 6802 Weber Road (1st Reading 9/19/17) Case No. 0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP: Achange ofzoning from the ''CN-1^ Neighborhood Commercial District to ''CG-3^ General Commercial District. The property iadescribed aabeing O.838acres out ofthe west 17Ofeet ofFoxvvoodEstates Phase |||. Block 11. Lot 3. located along the east aide of Weber Road, north of Bratton Road, and south of Saratoga Boulevard. City v,Corpus ooueo Page Printed vnummumr City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 Planninq Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by CC Ventures Equities ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to the west 170 feet of Foxwood Estates Phase III, Block 11, Lot 2, from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo 0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP Ordinance 0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP PP 0617-03 CC Ventures IV LP CC Report 0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP w Exhibits 10. 17-1175 Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating State grant for Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Program within the Police Department(1st Reading 9/19/17) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division in the amount of$51,920.42 for the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Program within the Police Department with a cash match of$12,926.93 and an in-kind match of$8,280.00 for a total project cost of$73,127.34; appropriating the $51,920.42 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund for the VAWA grant in the Police Department; and authorizing the transfer of$12,926.93 from the No. 1020 General Fund to the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund and appropriating the same for a total project cost of $73,127.34. Attachments: Agenda memo VAWA appropriation__09.19.201 7 Ordinance-VAWA grant 2017-Police Award letter 1718 11. 17-1176 Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating State grant funds for the FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program within the Police Department (1st Reading 9/19/17) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the Texas Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division through the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, in the amount of$11,241.00 for the City of Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda'Final September 26,2017 State FY 2017 Edward Byrne yWenloha| Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Program; and appropriating the $11.241.00inthe No. 1OO1 Police Grants Fund to fund the enhancement oflaw enforcement efforts by the Police Department. Attachments: Agenda memo JAG grant appropriation 09.1 .2017 Ordinance- FY 2017 Edward By ne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant-State Award letter L. RECESS FOR LUNCH The City Council will take alunch break atapproximately/:30p.m. M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 12) 12' 1[7-11[72 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance for the Adoption ofthe Downtown Area Development Plan Ordinance adopting anew Area Development Plan for the City ofCorpus Christi titled ''The Downtown Area Development Plan; Rescinding the Central Business Development Plan adopted byCity Council ordinance #035658; providing for severance; and providing for publication. Attachments: Agenda Mem -Downtown AQP Ordinance- Downtown ADP Survey Results- Q wntown AQP Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C N. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 13 -20) The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will boconsidered and voted onindividually. 13' 1[7-1C203 Second Reading Ondinanom -AdoptingthmCit* ofCorpuoChrioti Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2O17-2O18 (1st Reading 9/19/17) Ordinance adopting the City of Corpus Christi operating budget for the fiscal year 3O17-3O18beginning October 1. 3O17; tobefiled with the County Clerk; appropriating monies aaprovided inthe budget; and providing for severance. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Adoption of Y 2017-2018 OLtLgj[D����oc> Ordinance FY 201jzZ2jL_E�docx Presentation- FY2018 Budget 1st Reading pptx City v,Corpus ooueo Page Printed vnummumr City Council Meeting Agenda'Final September 26,2017 14. 1[7-1i245 Ordinance toratify increase of$4,O34,OO5inproperty tax revenues from last year's operating budget aoreflected inthe 2O17-2O18 operating budget; and declaring an emergency Attachments: Agenda Mem -Ordinance to ratify ,2nd Reading.docx Ordinance- Ratifying tax increas FY 2017-18-60 cent.docx 15. 1[7-11C33 Construction Contract for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 (Bond 2O14, Proposition 2) Motion authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, toexecute a construction contract with Mo-Con Services, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$44O.88O.4O for North Padre Island Beach Aooeaa Road 3for Total Base bid plus Additive Alternate No.1 and Additive Alternate No. 3. (Bond 3O14. Proposition 3) Attachments: Agenda Mem - NP Island Beach Access Road 2 Project Budget N rth Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 Location Map No h Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 Presentation- P1 Beach Access Rd 2 Letter of Recommendation Form 1295 Mo-Con Construction 16' 1[7-1K090 Construction Contract for Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue (Bond 2O14, Proposition 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, toexecute a construction contract with MAX Underground Construction, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas inthe amount of$3.844.135.13for Staples Street from Alameda Drive toMorgan Avenue for atotal Base Bid 3 (flexible pavement). (Bond 3O14Proposition 1) Attachments: Project Budget Staples Street Location Map Sta les Street Presentation-St Letter of RecommgDdafion Staples Street Form 1295-E13094 MAX UndergEglInd Construction 17. 1[7-11K59 Master Service Agreement for Indefinite Dm|inmm/|ndmfinintm Quantity UD|Q\ Major Ditch Improvements (Capital Improvement Program) Motion authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, toexecute aMaster Service Agreement (yWSA) with Lockwood, Andrews and Nevvnanl. Inc. City v,Corpus ooueo Page Printed vnummumr City Council Meeting Agenda'Final September 26,2017 (LAN) ofCorpus Christi, Texas inthe amount of$3OO.00Ofor |O|(] (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) Major Ditch |rnprovernenba. (Capital Improvement Program) Attachments: Agenda-Memo-IDIQ Ma Ditch Im Presentation- IDIQ Major Ditch Imps Form 1295 LAN -IDIQ Major Ditch Imps 18. 1[7-11[79 Contract Amendment for Employee Assistance Program Services Motion authorizing the City Manager ordesignee toexecute an amendment to the contract with Family Counseling Services of Corpus Chriad. Texaa, not to exceed $30.000. The value of the service agreement for the full contract period ofSeptember 3O. 3O13through September 3O. 3O17iaanot-to-exoeedamount of$O8.858. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Family Counseling FY 2017 xtension Amendment IV- EAP Family Counseling Fully Ex cuted 19. 1[7-11[77 Service Agreement for Employee Assistance Program for anot to mxommd amount of$15,840 and a total potential mmuti-year amount of up to $79,200. Motion authorizing City Manager, ordesignee, bzexecute anagreement with Family Counseling Service of Corpus Chhad. Texas to provide employee assistance program services for the Corpus Christi City employees and their families in response to Request for Bid No. 1344 based on the lowest neaponaive, responsible bid fora total amount not to exceed $15.840. and is being budgeted in FY3017-18through the annual budget appropriations. The term ofthe agreement iafor one year with an option toextend for uptofour additional one-year periods, subject tothe sole discretion of the Cib/, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $79,200. Attachments: Aqenda Memo-Qm2loyee Assistance Program Bidjab-Employee Assistance Program 20' 1[7-11K69 Second Reading Ondinanom -Appnmpriating Fund Proceeds for Fiscal Year 2O16-2O17 (1otReading 9/19/17) Ordinance appropriating amounts of: (a) $38.8OO.18; (b) $1.338.75O.53; (o) $1.833.537.38; (d) $112,416.90; and (e) $173.47178; into the Airport City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 CIP, Bond Proceeds, Utility Revenue Bond, Specialty Bond Proceeds and other Unappropriated Funds, respectively, for the following purposes: City's match for future FAA Grant Projects, Bayfront, Public Facilities, Fire, Police, Public Health and Safety, Sanitary Landfill, Library, Convention Center, Parks, and Streets, and as further detailed in Attachment 1; changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase expenditures accordingly. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Interest Appro Ordinance- Interest Appro Appropriations 2017 O. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 21) 21. 17-1195 First Reading Ordinance -Closing of a utility easement located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway Ordinance abandoning and vacating 0.303 acre of an existing utility easement out of a part of Bohemian Colony Lands, Block 7, Lot 2, located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway and requiring the owner, AEP Texas Central Company, to comply with the specified conditions. Attachments: Agenda Memo AEP Ordinance with Exhibits AEP PowerPoint Legistar P. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 22 -30) The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 22. 17-1223 Resolution Adopting the Nueces County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan A resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas adopting the Nueces County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Attachments: Agenda Memo Resolution HMAP Adoption Corpus Christi Plan CorpusChristi-Mitigation Items Floodplain Managment Checklist Resolution -HMAP 23. 17-1170 Resolution for a Supply Agreement for the Purchase of Chemkeys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant for a total not to exceed amount of$825,780.23 for the three-year term City of Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda'Final September 26,2017 Resolution finding that the purchase of ohernkeya and reagents for O.N. Stevens VVah*r Treatment Plant is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City yWanager, or deaignee, to execute a supply agreement with Hach Company of Love|and. Co|orado, for the purchase of ohenlkeya and reagents for a bzbs| amount not to exceed $835.780.33for a three-year term, with anannual step price increase. Attachments: Resolution Sole Source-Chernkeys and Reage ts for O.N. Stevens Price Sheet-Chernkeys and Reagents for O.N. tevens Supply Agreement-Chernkeys and Reagent for O.N. Stevens Form 1295-Chernkeys and Reagents for O.N. tevens 24. 1[7-11i56 Supply Agreement for the Purchase of Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant fora not to mxommd amount of$35O,941.00with a potential multi-year amount of up to $2,105,646.00 Motion authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, toexecute asupply agreement with Chenitnsde Chemicals US. LLC. of Parsippany, New Jersey for the purchase of liquid ammonium sulfate solution in response to Request for Bid (RFB) No. 13O1. based onthe lowest responsive, responsible bid, for atotal amount not bzexceed $ 35O.841.00. ofwhich $175,470.50 will be funded bythe Water Fund in F`y3017-18. The term of the agreement iafor two years with anoption bzextend for two additional two-year perioda, subject to the sole discretion of the Cib/, with a bzbs| potential multi-year amount ofupbz $3.1O5.O4O.00. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution Supply Agreement- Liguid A moniurn Sulfate Solution Form1295-Uguid Ammonium Sulfate Solution 25' 1[7-11B94 Resolution authorizing the submission ofa grant application for the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance KSnmnt Program Resolution authorizing the City Manager, ordesignee, tosubmit agrant application in the amount of up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) to the Office of the Governor for funding from the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant Program. Attachments: Aqenda Memo- QEAAG Application October 2017 Resolution -DEEAG 2017 application DEAAG Presentation 2017 City v,Corpus ooueo Page 11 Printed vnummumr City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 26. 17-1141 Small Business Agreement for Del Mar College Internship Program Resolution to approve a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Del Mar College (Del Mar) to provide grant up to $150,000 for their internship program to assist small businesses. Attachments: Memo Del Mar Resolution Del Mar Del Mar Aqreement 27. 17-1142 Small Business Agreement for Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi Internship Program Resolution to approve a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC) to provide grant up to $150,000 for their internship program to assist small businesses. Attachments: Memo TAMU-CC Resolution TAMU-CC TAMU-CC Aqreement 28. 17-1143 Small Business Agreement for LiftFund, Inc. Resolution to approve the Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and LiftFund, Inc. (LiftFund) to provide a grant up to $250,000 for their loan buy-down program to assist small business. Attachments: Memo LiftFund Resolution LiftFund LiftFund Agreement 29. 17-1144 Small Business Agreement for Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Chapter 221 Resolution to approve a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Chapter 221 to provide a grant up to $52,600 for their small business assistance program. Attachments: Memo SCORE Resolution SCORE SCORE Agreement 30. 17-1145 Small Business Agreement for Del Mar College Procurement Technical Assistance Center City of Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 Resolution approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Del Mar College (Del Mar) to provide a grant up to $48,490 for their Procurement Technical Assistance Center(PTAC) to assist small business. Attachments: Memo PTAC Resolution PTAC PTAC Agreement Q. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 31) Briefing information will be provided to the City Council during the Council meeting. Briefings are for Council information only. Council may give direction to the City Manager, but no other action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 31. 17-1089 Unified Development Code - Public and Private Improvements - Warranty Period Attachments: Agenda Memo 2 Year Warranty Presentation Power Point-Warranty Period- Legistar R. RECESS TO CORPORATION MEETING: (ITEM 32) 32. 17-1029 Annual Board Meeting of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation Attachments: Agenda Memo for CCHFC Board Meeting CCHFC Board Agenda CCHFC Minutes 16-06 CCHFC Financials as of June 30 2017 CCHFC CAFR 9.30.16 Bylaws-Amended-14-0218 S. RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: T. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 33 -35) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. If the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer. The City Council may deliberate and take action in open session on any issue that may be discussed in executive session. The description of an item in "Executive Sessions" constitutes the written interpretation by the City Attorney of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code and his determination that said item may be legally discussed in Closed Meeting in compliance with Chapter 551 the Texas Government Code. City of Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 9/25/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final September 26,2017 33. 17®1255 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the City's professional service management agreement for the Corpus Christi Museum of Science and History. 34. 17®1256 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to water supplies for industrial and other development, Financing Agreement and other legal documents related to loans provided by State Water Implementation Revenue Fund of Texas (SWIRFT), professional services agreements for the provision of services tied to said funding, desalination, potential interlocal agreements with water districts and other governmental entities involving water or other utility services, utility rate regulation, reuse, provisions of the Texas Utility Code, TCEQ Regulations, EPA regulations, and other laws and regulations, potential agreements for the economic development agreement(s) with business prospects that are considering the construction, expansion, and/or ownership of industrial facilities that will be consumers of water and/or wastewater services, potential creation of entities that could provide or assist in the provision of the aforementioned services, including, but not limited to local government corporation(s), and pursuant to Texas Gov't Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to the aforesaid business prospect(s) that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City may conduct economic development negotiations and/or deliberate possible economic development issues concerning said business prospect(s), including, but not limited to, potential contracts for the provision of water to said business prospect(s). 35. 17®1237 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning claims, pending litigation, potential settlement, attorney's fees, and/or other potential legal matters regarding lawsuit of Corpus Note LLC vs. City of Corpus Christi. U. IDENTIFY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Per Council Policies, an item may be added to the agenda by four members of the City Council. Council may give direction to the City Manager to add an item to a future agenda, but no other action will be taken, and no public comment solicited. V. ADJOURNMENT City of Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 9/25/2017 w 1201 Leopard Street City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi,TX 78401 forward.cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday,September 19,2017 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice --THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. CITIZEN COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak to the City Council MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. Mayor McComb called the meeting to order at 11:31 a.m. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Brian Hill, First Baptist Church. Pastor Brian Hill gave the invocation. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Peter Davidson, Marina Superintendent. Marina Superintendent Peter Davidson led the Pledge of Allegiance. D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles K. Risley,and City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Present: 9- Mayor Joe McComb,Council Member Rudy Garza,Council Member Paulette Guajardo,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Debbie Lindsey-Opel,Council Member Ben Molina,Council Member Lucy Rubio,Council Member Greg Smith, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn E. Proclamations /Commendations 1. Proclamation declaring September 23, 2017, "Girls in Aviation Day". Proclamation declaring September 2017, "Pediatric Cancer Awareness Month". Proclamation declaring September 2017, "Texas Strong Month". Swearing-In ceremony for newly appointed board, commission and committee members. Mayor McComb presented the proclamations and conducted the swearing-in ceremony for newly appointed board and committee members. F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: Mayor McComb referred to City Manager's Comments. City Manager Margie C. Rose reported on the following topics: a. OTHER 1) The Texas Department of Health and Human Services will open a Disaster Supplement Nutrition Assistance Program beginning today through September 25,2017 at the American Bank Center from 8:00 a.m.to 7:00 p.m.to serve Nueces and San Patricio counties.The program will provide short-term food benefits for eligible families recovering from the disaster.Information can be obtained by calling 2-1-1,selecting Option 6 or at www.hhs.texas.gov.2)The City of Corpus Christi Public Libraries have partnered with the Coastal Bend Food Bank for the"Food-for-Fines Program".The program allows citizens to clear overdue fines by donating non-perishable food items that will be used to assist victims of Hurricane Harvey. Each non-perishable item is worth a$1.00 towards an outstanding library fine.The"Food-for-Fines" Event will continue through Saturday,September 30,2017.3)The City of Corpus Christi and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ)have implemented the "Don't Mess with Texas Water" Program.The goal of the program is to provide the public with a way to report illegal dumping that can be harmful to surface water. Five partner signs are located at the following locations within the City: IH 37 and Nueces River; Highway 286 and Oso Creek;Staples and Oso Creek; JFK Causeway and Park Road 22; and Highway 361 and Packery Channel. G. MINUTES: 2. Regular Meeting of September 12, 2017 and Special Meeting of September 8, 2017. Mayor McComb referred to approval of the minutes. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the minutes,seconded by Council Member Rubio City of Corpus Christi Paye 2 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 and passed unanimously. S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 34) 34. Nueces County Appraisal District (NCAD) Update by Ronnie Canales, Chief Appraiser Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 34. Chief Appraiser Ronnie Canales with the Nueces County Appraisal District(NCAD) stated that the purpose of this item is to provide an update on the impact of Hurricane Harvey on property taxes and the process for property owners to report damages to the NCAD. Mr.Canales reported that NCAD personnel will be onsite in Port Aransas and Mustang Island to evaluate the properties and assess the damages in these areas.The NCAD has been working closely with the City of Port Aransas and Port Aransas Independent School District.Mr. Canales stated that Hurricane Harvey's impact on the City of Corpus Christi was minimal and damage are associated with broken fences,trees,and roof damage.Any changes to property assessments will be applied to next year's valuations. Mr.Canales provided a preliminary totals report of net taxable values from 2012 to 2017.Mr.Canales stated that the numbers reflect the economy is slowing down and construction is stablizing. Council members and Mr.Canales discussed the following topics:whether Flint Hills will prevail in its lawsuit regarding valuations; the impact to the City should Flint Hills prevail in its lawsuit; that no changes will be applied to this year's valuations for properties impacted by Hurricane Harvey; and the extensive damage on Mustang Island impacting next year's net taxable values. J. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. Citizen comments are limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to comments from the public. Trian Serbu, 14310 Playa del Rey,encouraged the City Council to not consider a property tax increase.Shirley Thornton, 1917 Woodcrest,spoke regarding the following:the Flour Bluff Citizens Council's town hall meeting with the Corpus Christi Police Department(CCPD)and the coordination by CCPD; support for Agenda Item 37,funding for Old Bayview Cemetery; and expressed opposition to a tax increase.Margareta Fratila,3606 Tripoli, requested more police officers and consideration of a hotel tax to fund public City of Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 safety instead of raising taxes.Colin Sykes,309 Aberdeen Avenue,spoke regarding his request at the August 15,2017 City Council meeting for the mayor to participate in the Mayor's National Climate Agenda. Carolyn Moon,4902 Calvin,spoke regarding climate change and requested the City of Corpus Christi support the Paris Climate Accord. Rick Milby,4412 High Ridge Drive, encouraged the City Council not to support a tax increase. H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 3. Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority Transportation Advisory Commission Tree Advisory Committee Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 3.The following appointments were made: Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau Council Member Vaughn made a motion to reappoint Kamlesh Bhikha(Hotel Industry),Melody Nixon-Bice(Hotel Industry),Johnny Philipello(Attraction Industry),and Fred F.Soward III (Restaurant Industry),seconded by Council Member Lindsey-Opel and passed unanimously. Council Member Smith made a motion to table the remaining appointments, seconded by Council Member Lindsey-Opel and passed unanimously. Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority Council Member Lindsey-Opel nominated Patricia B. Dominguez. Council Member Paulette Guajardo nominated Gabi S.Canales.Council Member Michael Hunter nominated Robbin C.Goodman. Patricia B. Dominguez was appointed with Mayor McComb,Council Members Lindsey-Opel,Molina,Smith,and Vaughn voting for Patricia B. Dominguez; Council Members Garza, Rubio,and Guajardo voting for Gabi S.Canales;and Council Member Hunter voting for Robbin C.Goodman. Transportation Advisory Commission Council Member Garza made a motion to appoint Phillip Davis(Bicycling Community Representative),seconded by Council Member Rubio and passed unanimously. Council Member Vaughn made a motion to appoint Larry L.White,seconded by Council Member Hunter and passed unanimously. Tree Advisory Committee Council Member Garza made a motion to reappoint Sylvia Campos(At-Large) and Phillip Christian (Arborist or Urban Forester),seconded by Council Member City of Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Molina and passed unanimously. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to appoint Donald C. Fields(AEP Texas),seconded by Council Member Hunter and passed unanimously. Council Member Smith made a motion to appoint Kevin Gibbs (At-Large), seconded by Council Member Lindsey-Opel and passed unanimously. S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 35) 35. Texas State Aquarium by Tom Schmid, President and CEO Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 35. President& CEO of the Texas State Aquarium Tom Schmid stated that the purpose of this item is to provide an update on the Texas State Aquarium.Mr.Schmid reported on the Aquarium's action plan during Hurricane Harvey and post-storm recovery efforts to open the aquarium to visitors. Mr.Schmid provided background on the new Caribbean Journey exhibit and information regarding attendance and the economic impact on the City and region.Mr. Schmid presented results from the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau's Brand Health Study reflecting the Texas State Aquarium as one of the top attractions that motivate visitors to travel to Corpus Christi.Mr.Schmid thanked the City of Corpus Christi for their continued partnership; investment of hotel occupancy tax(HOT)funding related to the Texas State Aquarium;and improvements made to North Beach. Council members and Mr.Schmid discussed the following topics: the addition of the Caribbean Journey;the use of HOT funds to market additional tourism; Mr.Schmid's leadership; room rental for events and efforts to advertise; the efforts made to identify community support to enhance the Texas State Aquarium;and the partnership between the City and the Texas State Aquarium. I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: K. CONSENT AGENDA: (4 - 12) Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to the Consent Agenda. There were no comments from the public.A council member requested that Items 4,6,7 and 8 be pulled for individual consideration. A motion was made by Council Member Lindsey-Opel,seconded by Council Member Molina,to approve the Consent Agenda.The consent agenda items were passed and approved by one vote as follows: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 City of Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 5. Resolution to Execute an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) for the Sports, Entertainment, and Arts (SEA) District Pedestrian Improvements project (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA)with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for the Sports, Entertainment, and Arts (SEA) District Pedestrian Improvements project with City's required payment to TxDOT in the amount of$21,000 for reimbursement of direct state costs. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) This Resolution was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031245 9. Approving funds subject to reimbursement for services provided by Texas A&M Health Science Center(Coastal Bend Health Education Center) [CBHEC] utilizing Diabetes Care Team for the Corpus Christi-Nueces County Public Health District (CCNCPHD) Motion approving up to but not to exceed $250,000.00 to pay for services provided by Texas A&M Health Science Center(Coastal Bend Health Education Center) [CBHEC] utilizing Diabetes Care Team for the Corpus Christi-Nueces County Public Health District (CCNCPHD) for the City contract period that ended May 2, 2017 and invoices between the City contract and the County contract that begins in August 1, 2017. Nueces County to reimburse full amount of paid funds per interlocal agreement. This Motion was approved on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-148 10. Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 325 North Staples Street (1st Reading 9/12/17) Case No. 0717-04 J R Electric Company: A change of zoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to "Cl" Intensive Commercial District. The property is described as Bluff, Block B, Lot 6, located at the intersection of North Staples Street and Comanche Street on the southwest corner, south of Lipan Street, and north of Caldwell Street. Planninq Commission and Staff Recommendation (August 9, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon City of Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 application by J R Electric Company ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to the property described as Bluff, Block B, Lot 6, from the "IL" Light Industrial District to "Cl" Intensive Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. This Ordinance was approved on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031246 11. Second Reading Ordinance -Adopting the 2017 National Electrical Code (1st Reading 9/12/17) Ordinance amending Corpus Christi Code of Ordinance, Chapter 14, Sections 14-201 &14-241 to adopt the National Electrical Code, 2017 Edition, with local amendments, amending sections 14-1306,14-1316, 14-1311, & 14-1313 to remove electrician licensing, registration, and special fee and clarifying building permit fees; providing for penalties, severance, effective date and publication. This Ordinance was approved on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031247 12. Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating funds for the 2018 Comprehensive Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP)within the Police Department (1st Reading 9/12/17) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) in the amount of$155,000.09 for the 2018 Comprehensive Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) within the Police Department, for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), speed enforcement, and distracted driving overtime, with a city match of $47,166.67, for a total project cost of$202,166.76 and appropriating $155,000.09 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. This Ordinance was approved on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031248 4. Service Agreement for Tire Repair and Replacement Services for the Corpus Christi Fire Department Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement with Beasley Tire Services, Inc. of Houston, Texas for the repair and replacement services of tires for the Corpus Christi Fire Department in response to Request for Bid No. 978 based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $116,510.00, and City of Corpus Christi Paye 7 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 budgeted in FY2017-18. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. Mayor McComb referred to Item 4. Fire Chief Robert Rocha,Assistant Director of Financial Services Kim Baker and Director of Engineering Jeff Edmonds and council member discussed the following topics related to Agenda Items 4, 6, and 7: the term of the agreements providing the City Manager with an option to extend the contract administratively for additional periods; providing transparency to the public by reflecting in the agenda caption the full amount the City Council is obligating the City to when approving the action and the option years;the City Council requesting that option years not be approved administratively and brought back to the City Council for consideration or ratification yearly;the need for staff to re-evaluate the procurement process; the difference between the competitive bid process for Purchasing and Engineering contracts;whether the bid price is dependent on options to extend the term of the contracts;whether staff is checking alternate prices prior to exercising the renewal option;and the financial benefit of reviewing the renewal options yearly. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to amend the motion by adding language"subject to City Council authorization prior to renewal hereof", seconded by Council Member Hunter and passed unanimously. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to approve the motion as amended,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Motion was passed and approved as amended with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-144 6. Construction Contract for Citywide Collection System Pipe Bursting Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Part C (Capital Improvement Program) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a multi-year ID/IQ construction contract with PM Construction & Rehab, LLC dba IPR South Central, LLC, of Pasadena, Texas in the amount of$2,000,000 for Citywide Collection System Pipe Bursting ID/IQ Part C. This is a one (1) year base contract with four (4) optional one (1) year renewals to be approved administratively subject to availability of funding and satisfactory contractor performance. (Capital Improvement Program) (Cl P) Mayor McComb referred to Item 6,execution of a multi-year ID/IQ construction contract for Citywide Collection System Pipe Bursting ID/IQ Part C. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds explained the bidding process for the City of Corpus Christi Paye 8 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 multi-year construction contract and the ability for prices to be adjusted. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to amend the motion by adding language"subject to City Council authorization prior to renewal hereof", seconded by Council Member Garza and passed unanimously. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to approve the motion as amended,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Motion was passed as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-145 7. Service Agreement for Preventative and Emergency Maintenance for Various Lift Stations for Wastewater Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with ADK Environmental, Inc., of Odem, Texas for preventative and emergency maintenance for various lift stations for Wastewater Division in response to Request for Bid No. 1247 based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $158,362.50, and budgeted in FY2017-18. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. Mayor McComb referred to Item 7,execution of a service agreement for preventative and emergency maintenance for various lift stations for the Wastewater Division. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to amend the motion by adding language"subject to City Council authorization prior to renewal hereof", seconded by Council Member Garza and passed unanimously. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to approve the motion as amended,seconded by Council Member Garza. his Motion was passed and approved as amended with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-146 8. Annual Joint Funding Agreement for Water Resources Investigation with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) City of Corpus Christi Paye 9 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to renew an annual Joint Funding Agreement for Water Resources Investigation with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior, for automated river gauging stations to gather and maintain accurate records of stream flows for rivers associated with the City's reservoirs, with the City's cost to be $157,060. This Contract runs from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018. Mayor McComb referred to Item 8, renewal of an annual Joint Funding Agreement for Water Resources Investigation with the United States Geological Survey.A council member referred to a transmittal letter in the agenda packet and questioned the process for handling and tracking official documents received by the City of Corpus Christi.There were no comments from the public. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to approve the motion, seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-147 L. RECESS FOR LUNCH Mayor McComb recessed the Council meeting at 1:33 p.m.Mayor McComb recovened the Council meeting at 2:05 p.m. S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 36) 36. Update - Port of Corpus Christi Authority by City Council Appointees Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 36. Charlie Zahn,Chairman of the Port of Corpus Christi Authority(Port),stated that the purpose of this item is to allow the City Council's Port appointees to provide an update on Port operations and activities related to Hurricane Harvey.Mr.Zahn said the presentation will conclude with an update on desalination. Port Commissioner David Engel presented the statement of revenues and expenses;a chart reflecting tonnage;and investments at the Port. Port Commissioner Wayne Squires reported on the Port's long-range focuses including: deepening and widening the Ship Channel;the total project cost for widening and the approval of accelerated payments; land purchases; and consideration for public/private partnerships. Port Commissioner Richard Valls provided a timeline of emergency management team operations,in conjunction with the Coast Guard,to prepare for the storm including: halting incoming traffic to the Port,removing vessels,and securing barges. City of Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Commissioner Valls praised the efforts of the recovery team post-storm and stated that the Port should receive full clearance of restrictions by the end of the week. Chairman Zahn presented information on the Port's participation in the regional desalination efforts including: attendance and participation in industry stakeholder meetings;the Port's offering of available property, La Quinta and Harbor Island,with waterfront access for outfall and intake structures; direction to staff to look into permit applications for both sites;and reaching out to companies to interview and evaluate experience with permitting a desalination plant.Chairman Zahn presented the timeline for the desalination permit application process and the Port's intent to have a permit available should the City need to consider an alternate water source. Council members and Chairman Zahn discussed the following topics: reassurance regarding the Port's participation in desalination efforts;the Port being instrumental in growing the economy;the Port's long-term focus for widening and deepening the channel;and the Port's commitment to environmental efforts in Corpus Christi. M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEMS 13 - 14) 13. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance -Rezoning property located at 1840 Saratoga Boulevard Case No. 0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property is described as being Bohemian Colony Lands 6.379 acres out of Section 7, Lot 5, located north of Saratoga Boulevard and east of Greenwood Drive. Planninq Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley Cox ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Bohemian Colony Lands 6.379 acres out of Sec. 7, Lot 5, from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Mayor McComb deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 13. Interim Director of Development Services Bill Green stated that the purpose of this item is to rezone the subject property for the sale of the property. Mr.Green stated that the Planning Commission and staff are in favor of the zoning change. City of Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Mayor McComb opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Mayor McComb closed the public hearing. Council members and staff discussed the following topics:the public notice posted on July 26,2017; the public hearing relating to the zoning change being delayed due to Hurricane Harvey; the plans for the property;the zoning of the surrounding property;and requesting that staff expedite the process of presenting items to City Council. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Rubio. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 14. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance -Rezoning property located at 6802 Weber Road Case No. 0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP: A change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to "CG-2" General Commercial District. The property is described as being 0.839 acres out of the west 170 feet of Foxwood Estates Phase I 11, Block 11, Lot 2, located along the east side of Weber Road, north of Bratton Road, and south of Saratoga Boulevard. Planninq Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by CC Ventures Equities ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to the west 170 feet of Foxwood Estates Phase III, Block 11, Lot 2, from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Mayor McComb referred to Item 14.Interim Director of Development Services Bill Green stated that the purpose of this item is to rezone the subject property to allow for the construction of a carwash.Mr.Green stated that the Planning Commission and staff are in favor of the zoning change. Council members and staff discussed the following topics:the location of the subject property and its proximity to Turning Point Church. City of Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Mayor McComb opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Mayor McComb closed the public hearing. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 N. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 15 - 18) 15. Action Setting the City Council Meeting Date to Adopt the Property Tax Rate Motion setting October 17, 2017 as the date of the adoption of the ad valorem tax rate of$0.626264 per$100 valuation. Mayor McComb referred to Item 15,action setting the City Council meeting date to adopt the property tax rate.City Attorney Miles K. Risley stated that Items 15 and 16 are related and explained that based on the City Council action to increase the tax rate to$0.626264 and the extension of the timeline, due to Hurricane Harvey, granted by Governor Greg Abbott regarding adoption of the property tax rate,staff reviewed regulations under the Texas Tax Code and the Texas Local Government Code necessary for the City to be in compliance.City Attorney Risley stated that the City Council will need to adopt a budget to include the increased rate of$0.626264. The revised budget was filed in the City Secretary's Office on September 15,2017 and the law requires that the budget must be on file for 30 days before it can be adopted.The tax rate can be adopted as early as October 17,2017.Staff is recommending setting October 17,2017 as the date of adoption of the ad valorem tax rate of $0.626264 per$100 valuation. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: concern with adopting the tax rate after the September 28,2017,which will result in the City's taxes not being included in the consolidated tax statements issued by the Nueces County Tax Assessor;the cost associated with the City providing a separate tax statement;whether the ballot language regarding the voter-approved charter amendment to establish a dedicated fund to address residential street reconstruction funded by a tax increase included reference the rollback rate;the reason Legal Department staff were unaware of applicable legal requirements when prior action was taken by the City Council to increase the tax rate;whether the vote to increase the tax rate can be reversed;the provision in Section 102.55 of the Texas Local Government Code requiring the budget that is to be adopted be on file for 30 days;the City Council's ability to amend the proposed budget;the City would be in compliance should the City Council decide at the Special Meeting on September 22,2017 to not increase the tax rate;staff's recommendation to adopt the proposed timeline to reduce potential risk and protect the City to the maximum extent;the date the original budget with the$0.606264 tax rate was City of Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 filed; request to begin Council budget discussions earlier in the year; clarification that the timeline previously presented to the City Council was prior to the extension granted by the Governor;the action taken at the September 12,2017 City Council meeting to adopt the tax rate of$0.606264;the impact of not approving Agenda Items 15 and 16;and identifying funding in the FY2017-2018 budget for residential streets. Mayor McComb called for a brief recess at 3:55 p.m. Mayor McComb reconvened the Council meeting at 4:04 p.m. Council Member Garza made a substitute motion on Item 15 setting September 28,2017 as the date of the adoption of the ad valorem tax rate of$0.606264 per $100 valuation,seconded by Council Member Smith. In response to a council member,staff verified the timeline associated with this action: two public hearings to be held on Friday,September 22,2017 at 11:30 a.m.and Monday,September 25,2017 at 11:30 a.m.with final action taken by City Council on Thursday,September 28,2017 at 4:00 p.m. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-149 16. Action to Schedule Two Public Hearings Related to Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Property Tax Motion to consider a tax increase and setting public hearings on the ad valorem tax rate for October 6, 2017 and a second public hearing for October 10, 2017 during the City Council meeting beginning at 11:30 a.m. at City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas. No action taken on this item. 17. Second Reading Ordinance -Approving the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide (1st Reading 9/12/17) Ordinance approving the Fiscal Year 2017 - 2018 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide in the amount of$142,224,600. Mayor McComb referred to Item 17.Assistant City Manager Mark Van Vleck stated that the purpose of this item is to approve the FY2017-2018 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning(CIP) Guide.There were no comments from the public. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: plans for City of Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 improvements to City Hall and the funding mechanism;and the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant's UV System. Council Member Smith made a motion to approve the Ordinance,seconded by Council Member Garza. This ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 031249 18. Professional Services Contract for Tourist Area Amenities - Wayfinding Initiative Project Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a professional services contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$251,860 for the Tourist Area Amenities - Wayfinding Initiative project. Mayor McComb referred to Item 18. Business Liaison Alyssa Barrera stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a professional services contract for the Tourist Area Amenities-Wayfinding Initiative project funded by hotel occupancy tax(HOT)funds.Ms. Barrera provided the following information: project background; the project location;the project scope;an example of the project scope for the Downtown Streetscape bond project,including wayfinding signage and gateways;examples of best practices in Texas; examples of existing wayfinding signage in Corpus Christi;the project schedule;and statistics on the downtown area. Ms. Barrera explained that the manual and implementation plan would incorporate elements for the entire community and could be applied to other parts of the City. The presentation team consisted of: Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds; President of the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau Paulette Kluge;and consultants Shane Torno with Freese and Nichols, Inc.and Peter Reed, Focus EDG. Council members and the presentation team discussed the following topics: funding sources;the ability to coordinate wayfinding with the new Harbor Bridge; the use of technology to locate destinations;whether specific businesses will be identified on wayfinding signage and if so,consideration that those businesses contribute to funding; packaging wayfinding encourage visitors to explore the area; concern with the cost of the project; decline of ad valorem tax revenue in the downtown area;whether HOT funds can be used to enhance safety;who designed the Park and Recreation signs at Oleander Point;a mechanism to address the maintenance of the wayfinding signage to include in-house staff; concern with the professional services contract not being competitively procured;funding options for implementation;the number of buildings considered historical in the downtown area; the need for design services work to develop a wayfinding plan;the difference between the City of Corpus Christi Page 15 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Request for Qualifications(RFQ)and Request for Proposal (RFP) process; and the criteria for use of HOT funds. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Vaughn made a motion directing the City Manager to go out for a RFQ for a professional services agreement for Tourist Area Amenities - Wayfinding Initiative Project,seconded by Council Member Guajardo and passed unanimously. Q. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 19 -22) 19. First Reading Ordinance -Adopting the City of Corpus Christi Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Ordinance adopting the City of Corpus Christi operating budget for the fiscal year 2017-2018 beginning October 1, 2017; to be filed with the County Clerk; appropriating monies as provided in the budget; and providing for severance. Mayor McComb referred to Item 19. Director of Management and Budget Eddie Houlihan stated that the purpose of this item is to adopt the City of Corpus Christi Operating Budget for FY2017-2018 on first reading.Mr. Houlihan presented the following information:the number of full-time employees; revenues and total expenditures;the summary of proposed amendments;and key dates.City Manager Margie C. Rose provided an overview of the service level changes in the proposed budget. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: identifying$3 million for residential streets; the transfer to the arena fund in the amount of $1,222,916; the number of sworn police officers and firefighters;and consideration to reduce the number of additional backflow prevention positions from four to one. Council Member Garza made a motion to amend the budget by reducing the number of additional backflow prevention program positions from four to one, reducing$226,000 from the$306,576 originally allotted,seconded by Council Member Rubio. Discussion on the motion to amend included:the current number of backflow prevention program positions; consideration to fund two positions;and the other inspection roles of the Development Services Department. This motion to amend was passed and approved with the following vote: Mayor McComb, Council Members Garza,Guajardo, Hunter, Lindsey-Opel, Molina, Rubio,Smith,and Vaughn voting"Aye". Council Member Vaughn referred to a motion of direction passed at the August 15,2017 Council Workshop directing the City Manager to appropriate the $2,575,022 from the Internal Services Unreserved Fund Balances to fund the following one-time General Fund costs recommended in a FY2017-2018 decision package: Municipal Court Reporting Software$140,000; Parks and Recreation -Corpus Christi Independent School District(CCISD) Natatorium $500,000; Police replacement vehicles$390,294;facility repairs at Animal City of Corpus Christi Page 16 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Control for$150,000;and$650,000 for purchase of a fire truck for Fire Station 18.Council Member Vaughn stated that she would like to make a motion to allocate a portion of these funds to public safety. City Manager Rose explained that of the$2,575,022, only$1,694,863 can be allocated to the General Fund and$1,030,294 of those funds can be used for public safety. However,in order to ensure funding for Animal Control repairs and the purchase of the fire truck,$135,431 is needed.Staff is recommending the use of the contingency account to fully cover the recommended items. Council Member Vaughn made a motion to amend the budget by using the General Fund Revenues previously recommended to fund the one-time costs of Municipal Court Reporting Software, Parks and Recreation -Corpus Christi Independent School District(CCISD) Natatorium,and Police replacement vehicles$390,294 for a total of$1,030,294 to fund additional police officers, seconded by Council Member Guajardo. The following topics were discussed:an acknowledgement to utility customers that the use of the funds for public safety is coming from utilities; the number of police officers this motion would fund; the rebate of internal service funds to fund Municipal Court Reporting Software, Parks and Recreation -CCISD Natatorium,and police replacement vehicles;whether Municipal Court Reporting Software is a one-time expense; the amount of ad valorem and sales tax that goes into the General Fund to fund Police and Fire; the cost of Police and Fire contractual obligations for one year which are funded through the General Fund;the average annual cost per police officer, including equipment,for a first-year officer and increases each year thereafter associated with the collective bargaining agreements; concern with using funds identified for one-time expenditures as a sustainable source of funding; the percentage of the Police and Fire budgets allocated to personnel; clarification that the costs per Police officer funded by Crime Control does not include equipment,which is funded by the General Fund; use of technology to support public safety efforts; staffing for Fire Station 18; and ensuring that staffing and equipment costs are considered for bond projects. The motion to amend was passed and approved with the following vote: Council Members Garza, Guajardo, Hunter, Lindsey-Opel,Molina, Rubio, Smith,and Vaughn,voting"Aye"; Mayor McComb voting "No". In response to council members discussions related to the use of Texas Ambulance Supplement Payment Program (TASPP) reimbursements as a source of funding to staff firefighters at Fire Station 18,City Manager Rose stated that her research indicates that the TASPP reimbursement is not a sustainable funding source for Fire personnel and she recommended that funding from the reimbursements be used to address one-time expenditures for equipment. Council members, Fire Chief Robert Rocha,and Assistant Fire Chief Kenneth Erben discussed the following topics: the standard related to staffing a fire engine truck and the City's current staffing levels;the factors consideredin staff's recommendation to shift existing personnel from Fire Station 1 to man Fire Station 18; the current service levels at Fire Station 1; liability concerns with understaffing Fire Station 1;the use of generated revenues to staff Fire Station 18; the stability of EMS billing; communications with the Downtown City of Corpus Christi Page 17 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Management District and the Port of Corpus Christi regarding the reduction of staffing at Fire Station 1; the cost associated with funding 15 additional firefighters;whether stipulations can be made to ensure that excess revenue generated from TASPP can be maintained in the fund should funding be eliminated; the fee study to update fee schedules;a request to provide a table illustrating the projected increase in revenue generated by TASPP and EMS billing and the timetable for staffing Fire Station 18;the number of cities currently participating in TASPP; Fire's contractual collective bargaining obligations; and how to address a reduction-in-force should funding not be available in the future. Council Member Guajardo made a motion to amend the budget to provide that revenue generated from TASPP go directly into the Fire Department budget, seconded by Council Member Molina. Discussion on the motion to amend included: use of the funds to staff Fire Station 18; the number of years necessary before firefighters can be placed in the field; challenges with limiting the funds to Fire Station 18; and information related to potential EMS revenue. The motion to amend was passed and approved with the following vote: Council Members Garza, Guajardo, Hunter, Lindsey-Opel,Molina, Rubio, Smith,and Vaughn,voting"Aye"; Mayor McComb voting "No". Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to amend the budget related to Special Revenue Funds expenditures including Reinvestment Zone No.2 with a reduction of$89,500 and a transfer to the arena fund in the amount of $1,222,916,seconded by Council Member Rubio and passed unanimously. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to approve the ordinance as amended,seconded by Council Member Rubio. This Ordinance was passed on first reading as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio and Council Member Vaughn Nay: 2- Council Member Hunter and Council Member Smith Abstained: 0 Mayor McComb made a motion to ratify the property tax increase reflected in FY2017-2018 Operating Budget,that will raise more revenue from property taxes than in the previous fiscal year,as reflected in the adopted budget, sconed by Council Member Garza.This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Mayor McComb,Council Members Garza, Guajardo, Hunter, Lindsey-Opel,Molina, Rubio,Smith,and Vaughn,voting "Aye". 20. First Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating State grant for Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Program within the Police Department City of Corpus Christi Page 18 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division in the amount of$51,920.42 for the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Program within the Police Department with a cash match of$12,926.93 and an in-kind match of$8,280.00 for a total project cost of$73,127.34; appropriating the $51,920.42 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund for the VAWA grant in the Police Department; and authorizing the transfer of$12,926.93 from the No. 1020 General Fund to the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund and appropriating the same for a total project cost of$73,127.34. Mayor McComb referred to Item 20. Police Chief Mike Markle stated that the purpose of this item is to accept and appropriate a grant from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division in the amount of$51,920.42 for the Violence Against Women Act(VAWA) Program within the Police Department with a cash match of$12,926.93 and an in-kind match of$8,280 for a total project cost of $73,127.34. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Hunter made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 21. First Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating State grant funds for the FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program within the Police Department Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the Texas Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division through the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, in the amount of$11,241.00 for the State FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program; and appropriating the $11,241.00 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund to fund the enhancement of law enforcement efforts by the Police Department. Mayor McComb referred to Item 21. Police Chief Mike Markle stated that the purpose of this item is to accept and appropriate a grant from the Texas Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division through the U.S. Department of Justice in the amount of$11,241 for the State FY2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Program.There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Lindsey-Opel made a motion to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Molina. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: City of Corpus Christi Page 19 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 22. First Reading Ordinance -Appropriating Fund Proceeds for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Ordinance appropriating amounts of: (a) $29,800.19; (b) $1,328,756.52; (c) $1,822,527.28; (d) $112,416.90; and (e) $172,471.79; into the Airport CIP, Bond Proceeds, Utility Revenue Bond, Specialty Bond Proceeds and other Unappropriated Funds, respectively, for the following purposes: City's match for future FAA Grant Projects, Bayfront, Public Facilities, Fire, Police, Public Health and Safety, Sanitary Landfill, Library, Convention Center, Parks, and Streets, and as further detailed in Attachment 1; changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase expenditures accordingly. Mayor McComb referred to Item 22. Director of Financial Services Constance Sanchez stated that the purpose of this item is to appropriate a total of $3,465,972.68 of unappropriated interest earnings,reimbursements and miscellaneous revenue received during the year in the respective Capital Improvement Program funds from which they were earned.The funding can only be spent for purposes authorized. There were no comments from the public. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: information on the restrictions for the use of street funds; future Council review to prioritize the funds; and review of the bond conveyance to determine if street funds could be used for residential streets. Council Member Molina made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Smith. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 R. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 23 -33) Mayor McComb referred to Future Agenda Items.City Manager Margie C. Rose recommended waiving the planned presentations by staff.Council members spoke regarding Item 24. 23. Service Agreement for Document Scanning Services for Development Services City of Corpus Christi Page 20 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with MCCi, LLC of Tallahassee, Florida for document scanning services based on the Local Government Purchasing Cooperative dba Buyboard for a total amount not to exceed $135,000. The term of this services agreement is for six months. Funds are budgeted in the Development Services Fund for FY 2016-2017. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 24. Lease-Purchase of Two Motor Graders for Beach Operations and Ratifying Payments for Additional Monthly Rental of Existing Equipment Resolution authorizing City Manager, or designee, to authorize all documents necessary for the lease-purchase of three loaders and two motor graders from Doggett Heavy Machinery Services, LLC of Corpus Christi, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative dba BuyBoard, with the total amount not to exceed is $1,201,629.50; and ratifying the monthly rental of beach operations equipment for the months of November 2015 through January 2016, and November 2016 through January 2017 from Doggett Heavy Machinery Services, LLC and authorizing extension of the current rental agreement through December 2017. This Resolution was recommended to regular agenda. 25. Construction Contract for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Mo-Con Services, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$446,996.46 for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 for Total Base bid plus Additive Alternate No.1 and Additive Alternate No. 2. (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) This Motion was recommended to regular agenda. 26. Construction Contract for Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue (Bond 2014, Proposition 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with MAX Underground Construction, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$3,844,135.12 for Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue for a total Base Bid 2 (flexible pavement). (Bond 2014 Proposition 1) This Motion was recommended to regular agenda. City of Corpus Christi Page 21 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 27. Master Service Agreement for Indefinite Delivery/Indefininte Quantity (IDIQ) Major Ditch Improvements (Capital Improvement Program) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Master Service Agreement (MSA) with Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. (LAN) of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$300,000 for IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) Major Ditch Improvements. (Capital Improvement Program) This Motion was recommended to regular agenda. 28. Engineering Testing Agreement for Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an engineering testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$138,900 for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 29. Engineering Testing Agreement for J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an engineering testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$131,500 for the J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 30. Service Agreement for Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems at Landfills Resolution finding that the purchase and upgrade of software and equipment for the Solid Waste Department's scale systems is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with A-1 Scale Service, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, for upgrades of the scale system software and equipment for a total amount not to exceed $85,600.00, with funding available in the FY2016-2017 General Fund. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 31. Contract Amendment for Employee Assistance Program Services City of Corpus Christi Paye 22 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment to the contract with Family Counseling Services of Corpus Christi, Texas, not to exceed $20,000. The value of the service agreement for the full contract period of September 26, 2013 through September 30, 2017 is a not-to-exceed amount of$69,958. This Motion was recommended to regular agenda. 32. Service Agreement for Employee Assistance Program for a not to exceed amount of$15,840 and a total potential muti-year amount of up to $79,200. Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement with Family Counseling Service of Corpus Christi, Texas to provide employee assistance program services for the Corpus Christi City employees and their families in response to Request for Bid No. 1244 based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $15,840, and is being budgeted in FY2017-18 through the annual budget appropriations. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $79,200. This Motion was recommended to regular agenda. 33. Service Agreement for Workers' Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services for one year at $132,000 with four one-year options and a total potential multi-year amount of$660,000. Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with York Risk Services Group, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey for workers' compensation third-party administrator services in accordance with Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 1133, based on best value for a total amount not to exceed $132,000, budgeted in FY2017-18. The term of this agreement is for one year with option to extend for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $660,000. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 37) 37. Funding for Old Bayview Cemetery Mayor McComb referred to Item 37,funding for Old Bayview Cemetery.Council Member Vaughn informed the City Council that Director of Parks and Recreation Jay Ellington and representatives of the Historical Society met to discuss funding for Old Bayview Cemetery.Council Member Vaughn reported City of Corpus Christi Page 23 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 that funding was promised for Old Bayview Cemetery in the amount of$50,000 until President of the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) Paulette Kluge chose to not support the funding.Council Member Vaughn requesting funding Old Bayview Cemetery in the amount of$50,000 for FY16-17 and FY17-18 to be used for the reenactment and capital expenditures. In response to Council Member Vaughn,Mr. Ellington stated that staff is researching whether capital expenditures is an authorized use of HOT funds. Funding for the programmatic portion of the request is being provided. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Vaughn made a motion directing the City Manager to appropriate$50,000 from HOT funds for Old Bayview Cemetery for FY16-17, seconded by Council Member Rubio. Discussion on the Motion of Direction included: collection of HOT funds; clarification on restoration of historical buildings;the HOT fund budget;an examination of the HOT fund expenditures; challenges with funding from the current fiscal year;and the need for a contract to transfer funds to next fiscal year. City Manager Rose stated that she will investigate this issue further and will bring back for discussion. Council Member Vaughn withdrew her motion; Council Member Rubio withdrew her second. T. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 38 -40) Mayor McComb referred to the day's executive sessions.The Council went into executive session at 8:18 p.m.The Council returned from executive session at 9:50 P.M. 38. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to water supplies for industrial and other development, desalination, potential interlocal agreements with water districts and other governmental entities involving water or other utility services, utility rate regulation, reuse, provisions of the Texas Utility Code, TCEQ Regulations, EPA regulations, and other laws and regulations, potential agreements for the economic development agreement(s) with business prospects that are considering the construction, expansion, and/or ownership of industrial facilities that will be consumers of water and/or wastewater services, potential creation of entities that could provide or assist in the provision of the aforementioned services, including, but not limited to local government corporation(s), and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to the aforesaid business prospect(s) that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City may conduct economic development negotiations and/or deliberate possible City of Corpus Christi Page 24 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 economic development issues concerning said business prospect(s), including, but not limited to, potential contracts for the provision of water to said business prospect(s). This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 39. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the provision of incentives pursuant to any previously executed or proposed economic development/ business incentive agreement(s) between the City and/or related entities and Upper Padre Partners, LP, Gulf Shores Ventures, and/or North Padre Waterpark Holdings, Ltd. and possible development agreements or other funding mechanisms related to the construction of Park Road 22 bridge and related infrastructure, including, but not limited to, bridges, culverts, canals, sewers, lift stations, pump stations, revetments, pilings, and ditches, and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to business prospect(s) that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City may conduct economic development negotiations and/or deliberate possible economic development issues concerning said business prospect(s). This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 40. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.074 (Personnel Matters) to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Auditor. Mayor McComb referred to Item 40 and the following motion was considered: Motion to dismiss City Internal Auditor Arlena Sones. Council Member Smith made a motion to approve the motion,seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-150 U. IDENTIFY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS City of Corpus Christi Page 25 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes September 19,2017 Mayor McComb referred to Identify Council Future Agenda Items. City Manager Margie C. Rose referred to the scheduled City Council meetings: Friday, September 22,2017 at 11:30 a.m., First Public Hearing om the Property Tax Rate; Monday,September 25,2017 at 11:30 a.m.,Second Public Hearing oo the Property Tax Rate; Thursday,September 28,2017 at 4:00 p.m.,Adoption of the Property Tax Rate;and Tuesday,September 26,2017 at 11:30 a.m., Regular City Council Meeting and Adoption of the Operating Budget. V. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:54 p.m. City of Corpus Christi Page 26 Printed on 9/22/2017 w 1201 Leopard Street City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi,TX 78401 forward.cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Workshop Session Wednesday,September 13,2017 2:00 PM City Council Chambers Public Notice -- ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA ARE FOR COUNCIL'S INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. COUNCIL MAY GIVE DIRECTION TO THE CITY MANAGER, BUT NO OTHER ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AND NO PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE SOLICITED. THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. Mayor McComb called the meeting to order at 2:05 p.m. B. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles Risley,and City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. Present 9- Mayor Joe McComb, Council Member Rudy Garza, Council Member Paulette Guajardo, Council Member Michael Hunter, Council Member Debbie Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Ben Molina, Council Member Lucy Rubio, Council Member Greg Smith,and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn Council Member Molina arrived at 2:07 p.m. C. BRIEFINGS TO CITY COUNCIL: 1. Proposed FY2017-2018 Budget Workshop -General Fund, Internal Service Funds, Debt Service Funds, Enterprise Funds and Special Revenue Funds Mayor McComb referred to Item 1. Council Member Guajardo presented council members with solar-powered head lamps from Watts of Love; and discussed the Texas Ambulance Supplemental Payment Program (TASPP)as a City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 9/21/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 13,2017 revenue source to fund 15 additional firefighters for Fire Station 18. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: the budgetary and financial implications of TASPP funding;the reliability of TASPP monies as a consistent funding source; once hired,the need for a commitment to fund the additional firefighters whether TASPP monies are available or not;a presentation from the Corpus Christi Professional Firefighters'Association; raising taxes to fund additional firefighters should TASPP monies no longer be available;that the approximately$1.6 million in TASPP funding is for 10 months;that TASPP funding is associated with non-payment for ambulance services;and when further discussion and/or action should be taken by the City Council regarding funding additional firefighters with TASPP funding. City Manager Rose provided a summary of the upcoming advertisement, public hearing dates and action dates associated with setting a property tax rate and the potential effect of city council member absences during the special city council meeting scheduled for September 28,2017. Director of Management, Budget&Strategic Initiatives Eddie Houlihan provided a summary of Internal Services Funds,including: mission and mission elements; departments; number of employees,revenues and total expenditures by department; projected change in fund balance and FY 2018 decision packages. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds, Director of Facilities and Property Management Edgar Leonard,Assistant Director of Financial Services for Purchasing Kim Baker, Director of Information Technology Belinda Mercado,and Director of Human Resources (Health Benefits)Steven Viera each presented information on the following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related full-time equivalents (FTEs);efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; number of employees;total revenues;and expenditures. Following Mr. Edmonds presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: reasons/justifications for in- versus out-sourcing of certain engineering functions;the overall increase in Engineering Department expenditures from FY 2017 to FY 2018;filling FTE positions versus contracting out;that the budget presented accounts for internal costs,but does not include contract-employees; the number of contract-employees this fiscal year versus last fiscal year;actual versus budgeted FTEs; filling key positions in Engineering; the number of internal engineers that are necessary;a request to see the trend in contract-employees over previous fiscal years;a desire to see net changes; lack of clarity in the budget,as presented;a desire to have budget details; providing city council with greater budget detail;a desire to see the net effect of changes in the budget in lieu of detailed or summarized budget information; a suggestion that city staff populate city councils'screens on the dais with detailed budget information,if needed during the meeting;and a directive from City Manager Rose that staff who have yet to make presentations focus on the differences between FY 2017 and FY 2018. Following Mr. Leonard's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: the planned facility assessment and the need for a corresponding action plan;that the facility assessment is City of Corpus Christi Paye 2 Printed on 9/21/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 13,2017 being contracted out due to inadequate internal resources;the number of technicians and total number of employees in the department;that the customer(City department) pays for materials,but labor costs are already paid for via allocation;the City manages approximately 2.5 million square feet of space; and the job functions of custodians and technicians. Following Ms. Baker's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: contract administration training will be created and performed using in-house resources; the need for proper management when proposed expenditures exceed revenues in FY 2018; bar coding inventory;and management of Print Shop functions outside the Communications Department. Following Mr. Davis' presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: personnel costs;what comprises the Operating portion of the budget;the amount expended on outside repairs; projected trend in outside repair costs over the next few fiscal years; the number of equipment mechanics budgeted and employed;an explanation of allocations; and the reasons for the increase in FY 2017 versus FY 2018 allocations. Mayor McComb called for a recess at 4:04 p.m. Mayor McComb reconvened the Council meeting at 4:19 p.m. Following Ms.Mercado's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: the change in the allocation methodology used by the Information Technology(IT) Department;an explanation of the previous and current allocation methodologies;the one-time rebate to departments of$1.5 million from the IT Department's fund balance;that the IT Department's fund balance is a result of revenues exceeding expenses in past fiscal years;and that a reduction in the IT Department's FTEs is anticipated over the next few years due to Infor being cloud-based. Following Mr.Viera's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: the need for the new benefit consultant to identify cost-saving measures;the percent of increase in proposed revenues,from FY 2017 to FY 2018,that is funded by Fire, Police and Civilian employees; that under the terms of the collective bargaining contract, the City pays 100%of employee-only health insurance premiums for Fire and Police personnel;that Civilian personnel pay a portion of employee-only premiums and receive a much lesser health insurance benefit than do Police and Fire personnel; due to collective bargaining agreements,there are no changes being made to Police and Fire health insurance coverage;the impact of recent catastrophic claims; due to collective bargaining agreements with Police and Fire,the cost-saving measure of a high-deductible plan can only be implemented with civilian employees; 100%of the premium for dental insurance is paid by employees; basic,supplemental and optional life insurance is available to employees;the City pays 100%of the premium for basic life for City employees; eliminating the City-paid premium for basic life insurance and its potential negative impact on hiring and retaining City employees; rebuilding the Health Insurance fund balance;and that executive staff,non-executive civilian employees and Fire/Police personnel receive a basic life insurance benefit of$50,000,$10,000 and 1 times their annual salary, respectively. City of Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 9/21/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 13,2017 D. ADJOURNMENT Mayor McComb discussed timely submission of Hurricane Harvey-related expenses in order to meet FEMA-related reimbursement deadlines. The meeting was adjourned at 5:06 p.m. City of Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 9/21/2017 w 1201 Leopard Street City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi,TX 78401 forward.cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Workshop Session Thursday,September 14,2017 2:00 PM City Council Chambers Public Notice -- ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA ARE FOR COUNCIL'S INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. COUNCIL MAY GIVE DIRECTION TO THE CITY MANAGER, BUT NO OTHER ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AND NO PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE SOLICITED. THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. Mayor McComb called the meeting to order at 2:01 p.m. B. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles Risley,and City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. Present 9- Mayor Joe McComb, Council Member Rudy Garza, Council Member Paulette Guajardo, Council Member Michael Hunter, Council Member Debbie Lindsey-Opel, Council Member Ben Molina, Council Member Lucy Rubio, Council Member Greg Smith,and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn Council Member Lindsey-Opel arrived at 2:03 p.m. C. BRIEFINGS TO CITY COUNCIL: 1. Proposed FY2017-2018 Budget Workshop -General Fund, Internal Service Funds, Debt Service Funds, Enterprise Funds and Special Revenue Funds Mayor McComb referred to Item 1. Safety and Risk Manager Gilbert Sanchez presented information on the City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 14,2017 following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related full-time equivalents (FTEs);efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; number of employees;and total revenue and expenditures. Following Mr.Sanchez' presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: as of the end of August 2017, there have been 304 motor vehicle accidents city-wide in FY17/18;the types of motor vehicle accidents; preventable versus no-fault accidents;the requirement that a driving course must be taken post-accident;that the Police Department is responsible for the largest number of motor vehicle accidents each year;suspension of driving privileges for repeat offenders;that the number of motor vehicle accidents is very large;that the City Council may consider policy changes to address the large number of motor vehicle accidents;taking a look at accident reduction programs in comparative Texas cities;the number of additional police officers that can be funded with the approximately$1.5 million cost of motor vehicle accidents in the Police Department;about half of all Police Department motor vehicle accidents are at-fault and half are no-fault;and progressive discipline currently utilized by the Police Department relating to motor vehicle accidents. Director of Financial Services Constance Sanchez presented the following information regarding Debt Service Funds: mission; total revenue and expenditures; projected change in fund balance; outstanding general obligation debt; and outstanding utility revenue debt. Following Ms.Sanchez' presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: restrictions on the use of Type A funds; the purpose of the Economic Development Fund;Solid Waste transfers into other funds/use of Solid Waste revenues; reducing fees charged to the public that create fund balances in Enterprise Funds instead of the City using those excess revenues;the City will pay approximately$18 million dollars in interest on debt in FY 2018;and the overall impact of debt on the City's operations. Director of Management, Budget and Strategic Initiatives Eddie Houlihan, presented the following information regarding Enterprise Funds: mission; number of Enterprise Fund employees;total revenue and expenditures; projected change in the fund balance; FY 2018 decision packages;and a presentation overview and agenda. Following Mr. Houlihan's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: the$2.4 million decision package for chemical purchases is ongoing and not just one-time and is factored into the water rates the City Council just approved; if the cost of the take-or-pay water contract is factored into the newly-approved water rates; taking additional water from the Colorado River; reducing debt;and callable versus fixed debt. Interim Executive Director of Utilities Dan Grimsbo presented information on the following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related FTEs;efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; proposed water utility rates; proposed wastewater rates;employees and revenue; total expenditures for the Water,Wastewater,and Storm Water Funds; and projected change in the Water,Wastewater,and Storm Water Fund balances. City of Corpus Christi Paye 2 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 14,2017 Following Mr.Grimsbo's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: plant upgrades and return on investment; the quality of the City's water system;the cost of electricity to power plants; use of Type A funds for water quality projects; and identifying potential uses for water output from the City's hydrant flushing program. Director of Gas Bill Mahaffey presented information on the following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related FTEs; gas rates- average residential customer bill; efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; employees&revenue; total expenditures;and the projected change in the fund balance. Following Mr.Mahaffey's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: cross-training of Gas Department employees; not increasing gas rates; refurbishment of equipment;the reason the Gas Department does not have an unreserved fund balance;the Gas Department assisting other City departments with line location;that compressed natural gas (CNG)rates cover costs;that the City of Corpus Christi has the lowest CNG gas-gallon-equivalent rate in Texas; monies spent on system expansion; promotion of gas in new and existing residential subdivisions; industrial use of gas; potential savings from the use of gas to generate electricity for use by the City and associated impediments;and home builders'receptiveness to the use of gas in residential dwellings. Director of Aviation Fred Segundo and Marina Superintendent Peter Davidson each presented information on the following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related FTEs;efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; number of employees; and total revenues and expenditures. Following Mr.Segundo's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: having more revenues that expenditures;a desire for an increased number of flights and new airline service; improvements to and repaving of International Boulevard;an explanation of fixed-base operators;and funding of aircraft storage facilities by the City versus private developers. Following Mr. Davidson's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: reasons personnel costs are decreasing from FY 2017 to FY 2018,while the number of FTEs remain unchanged; damage to the L-Head due to Hurricane Harvey;floating versus fixed docks;the Marina's total debt and annual debt service;that boat slip rentals and restaurants are primary revenue sources for the Marina; grant opportunities;that the Marina will bill boaters whose improperly secured vessels caused damage to the Marina during Hurricane Harvey;the Marina's eligibility for Hotel Occupancy Tax(HOT)funds; the close proximity of the marina to the airport as compared to other cities;the decreased parking capacity as a result of the realignment of Shoreline Drive;and the need for adequate parking when multiple events take place at the same time. Director of Management, Budget and Strategic Initiatives Eddie Houlihan, presented the following information regarding Special Revenue Funds: mission; number of employees;total revenue and expenditures;the projected City of Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 14,2017 change in the fund balance; FY 2018 decision packages; and a presentation overview and agenda. Interim Director of Development Services Bill Green presented information on the following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related FTEs;efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; number of employees; total revenue and expenditures;and the projected change in the fund balance. Following Mr.Green's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: concerns regarding the City's Infor system; commercial development this year;the Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP)conversion process to Infor; backflow-related FTEs; having the private sector perform backflow prevention inspections instead of City employees;whether the four new City staff being requested for the backflow inspection program will generate sufficient revenue to offset their cost; minimizing risks to the City's water system; maintaining the integrity of the City's water supply;the number of directors in the Development Services Department in the last 10 years; use of a checklist by inspectors; the size and volume of building codes;and that a certificate of occupancy is not issued until the deficiencies identified during a City inspection are brought up to code. Director of the Streets Department Andy Leal presented information on the following topics: mission and mission elements; key services and related FTEs; efficiencies achieved in FY 2017 and planned in FY 2018; number of employees; total revenue and expenditures;and the projected change in the Fund 1041 and 1042 fund balances. Following Mr. Leal's presentation,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: progress on the City's Street Preventive Maintenance Program (SPMP);seal coating performed in-house;a request for an analysis of the cost of seal coating performed in-house versus being contracted out; cross-functional use of Street Department employees; cross-training of employees; plans to increase value achieved in the use of asphalt and seal coating in FY 2018;testing of new products; the value of chip-sealing;ways to bring down the per-yard price of ashpalt; procurement and engineering costs;thanks was extended to the hard-working employees in the Street Department who work in hot and difficult conditions; overlays versus street reconstruction;the voter-authorized 6 cent tax increase;the Bond 2016 residential rebuild;the use of skin-patching;the condition of arterials and collectors; multi-fiscal year contract amounts;that the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the construction of streets carry a one-year warranty with a performance bond in lieu of the two-year warranty previously discussed by the City Council;the use of HOT taxes;the long-range use of funds;a request that the City Manager provide City Council with the impact the proposed FY 2018 budget will have on service levels before the City Council adopts the FY 2018 budget;and the impact of Hurricane Harvey on HOT taxes and associated budgetary impacts. President of the Corpus Christi Professional Firefighters'Association Johnny Stobbs presented information on the following topics: the Texas Ambulance Supplemental Payment Program(TASPP)and what it is;where we are;the first payment will be received by the City toward the end of FY 2018; historical data and data points; metrics to project revenue;and revenue projection. City of Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 9/22/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes September 14,2017 Fire Chief Robert Rocha and Assistant Fire Chief Kenneth Erben presented information on the following topics: revenue maximization programs; TASPP; the number of participating providers and settlements through TASPP per fiscal year; 1115 Waiver renewal; Medicare cost reporting;the FY 2017 fiscal impact,with an effective approval date of December 1,2016,and being eligible for 10 months of reimbursement in FY 2017; the FY 2017 project work plan and timeline;and a listing of team members. Following the presentations by Mr.Stobbs, Chief Rocha and Assistant Chief Erben,the following items were discussed in response to questions from council members: the stability of the national Ambulance Supplemental Payment Program;the projected FY 2017 reimbursement of approximately$1.8 million;the number and rank of personnel needed in Fire Station 18;the amount of time required to hire staff;the long-term staffing plan for Fire Station 18; not tying TASPP funds to Fire Station 18; using TASPP funds in departments other than the Fire Department;and the timeline on the completion of Fire Station 18. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:44 p.m. City of Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 9/22/2017 se o� � AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 NORPOR PE 1852 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 19, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: William J. Green, P.E., Interim Director, Development Services BiIIG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3268 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services — Purchasing Division KimB26a�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Document Scanning Services for Development Services CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with MCCi, LLC of Tallahassee, Florida for document scanning services based on the Local Government Purchasing Cooperative dba Buyboard for a total amount not to exceed $135,000. The term of this services agreement is for six months. Funds are budgeted in the Development Services Fund for FY 2016-2017. PURPOSE: The objective of digitizing commercial drawings and documents is to comply with the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) requirement to maintain such documents for the life of commercial buildings. This effort also facilitates document management when responding to public information requests or court-ordered subpoenas expediently. Moving to digitally archiving also protects valuable information from physical damage and degradation from long term storage. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: At present, Development Services archives approximately 150,000 large format up to 42" wide plans/drawings, at external storage facilities or in-house storage space. The TSLAC requires municipalities to maintain commercial construction drawings during the existence of a building. The storage, maintenance and retrieval of these documents are ineffective operationally, as well as financially. Designated staff must accommodate requests to travel to an off-site facilities to research for records, on occasion several times a week. Archiving digitally will ensure protection of records with regards to security, inclement weather, disaster recovery and help improve response time to customer or public information requests. Upon approval of this agreement, MCCi has proposed to complete the scanning project in as little as three months. MCCi performs a thorough quality control process after the job has been completed. Each scanned image is inspected for quality, legibility, and accuracy. Steps are taken to ensure each document has been captured, the quality of the scanned image is comparable to the original, and all manual indexing errors have been corrected. After 90 days of project completion, MCCi will dispose of the records according to the terms defined by Development Services. This project includes the following: • Scanning approximately 150,000 large format images, based on an average of 100 pages per map/record. MCCi has provided this type of service for other municipalities throughout the country and locally to Human Resources, City Secretary's Office, and Development Services. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is to continue to operate utilizing external storage facilities and in-house office space for the storing of documents, keep hard copy construction plans, and continue to research for records through manual labor. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to City purchasing policies and procedures and state statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non-emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Municipal Information Technology Department Budget Office FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $212,536.97 $0 $212,536.97 Encumbered / Expended Amount $26,373.14 $0 $26,373.14 This item $135,000.00 $0 $135,000.00 BALANCE $51,163.83 $0 $51,163.83 Fund(s): Development Services Comments: The contract is for an amount not to exceed $135,000. Funds are budgeted in the Development Services Fund for FY 2016-2017. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Price Sheet CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PRICE SHEET PURCHASING DIVISION DOCUMENT SCANNING SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUYER: MICHAEL GUTIERREZ MCCi MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE EXTENDED TOTAL 1. Project-Conversion of Documents 150,000 1 $0.89 $133,500.00 2. Excess Images Contingency 0 Each $0.00 1 *$1,500 TOTAL $135,000.00 *Contingency to be expensed as needed s c. 0 H SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 52056 Document Scanning Services for Development Services THIS Document Scanning Services for Development Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation ("City") and Municipal Code Corporation ("Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Document Scanning Services for Development Services in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. N/A ("RFB/ RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Document Scanning Services for Development Services ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for six months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to zero additional zero-month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $135,000.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Page 1 of 7 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Margaret Castaneda Development Services Department 361-826-3078 Email: MargaretC@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no Page 2 of 7 charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is Page 3 of 7 responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Margaret Castaneda Finance & Resource Management Superintendent 2406 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, TX 78408 Fax: 361-826-3006 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Municipal Code Corporation Attn: Victor D'Aurio Vice President, Operations 1958-A Commonwealth Ln., Tallahassee, FL 32303 Fax: 850-564-7496 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM ANY AND ALL CONTRACTUAL AND NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS, DEMANDS, CAUSES OF ACTION, DAMAGES, LOSSES, AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF Page 4 of 7 LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEY'S FEES, AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES) OF WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION THAT ANY PERSON OR ENTITY HAS OR MAY HAVE DIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF THE BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR OR RESULTING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR, OR ITS EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, OR AGENTS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CITY, OR ITS EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, OR AGENTS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all Page 5 of 7 respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1 ) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) Page 6 of 7 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Victor D'Aurio Title: Vice President of Operations Date: 9-15-2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name- Title- Date- Attached ame:Title:Date:Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1 : RFB/RFP No. N/A Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response Page 7 of 7 s c. 0 ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE OF WORK 185 SCOPE OF WORK: The City will furnish MCCi for its use in preparing the document imaging project all hardcopy /electronic documents to be converted. The Contractor shall provide scanning services for approximately 1 ,500 large- format plans and drawings for an estimated 150,000 images. This price includes: document pick-up, scanning, removable hard drive and document destruction. The Contractor shall pick up all the hard copy documents on one trip from Development Services located at 2406 Leopard St. Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 and send them to one of their scanning facilities listed below. Once scanned, the Contractor shall send Development Services a removable hard drive device containing electronic copies of the documents in a format compatible with the City's Laserfiche system. The Contractor shall destroy all scanned documents. Contractor will bill monthly for services rendered throughout the term of the six-month period of the contract. Contractor shall complete 100% of the project within six months of the issuance of notice to proceed. Hard copies will be sent by MCCi to one or more of the following locations: Tallahassee, FL Location 1958-A Commonwealth Lane Tallahassee, FL 32303 Tampa, FL Location 4745 Oak Fair Blvd. Tampa, FL 33610 Waco, TX Location 600 Lake Air Drive Ste 21 B Waco, TX 76701 Page 1 of 1 .mus c� Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule v CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 'CORPORPfk 1852 BID FORM 1. Refer to "Sample Service Agreement" Contract Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price, including freight, for each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices. Invitation to quote, FOB Destination, Freight Included, on the follow ing: DESCRIPTION , QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE PNCE TOTAL Project I -Conversion of Documents 150,000 each $0.89 estimated cost, Buyboard #465-14 133,500.0 Excess Images O each $0.96 $0 TOTAL 133,500.00 12 COMPANY: MCCi Municipal Code Corporation NAME OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN: Victor D'Aurio ADDRESS: 1958-A Commonwealth Lane CITY / STATE/ZIP: Tallahassee, FL 32303 PHONE: (800) 342-2633 EMAIL: victor@mccinnovations.com FAX: (850) 564-7496 DATE: 6-2-2017 SIGNATURE: P . 4&1,6TITLE: Vice President of Operations THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT OR CANCEL ANY OR ALL BIDS. TO WAIVE ANY INFORMALITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN THE BIDS RECEIVED AND TO CANCEL OR POSTPONE THIS PROJECT UNTIL A LATER DATE. Page 1 of 1 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained-and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1 ) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on GL, AL and WC if applicable. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-day advance written notice of Bodily Injury and Property Damage cancellation, non-renewal, material Per occurrence - aggregate change or termination required on all certificates and policies. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY $1 ,000,000 Per Occurrence including: $1 ,000,000 Aggregate 1 . Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY (including) $1 ,000,000 Combined Single Limit 1 . Owned 2. Hired and Non-Owned 3. Rented/Leased WORKERS'S COMPENSATION Statutory and complies with Part II (All States Endorsement if Company is of this Exhibit. not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 ERRORS & OMISSIONS $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $1,000,000 Aggregate Page 1 of 3 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Page 2 of 3 Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2017 Insurance Requirements Purchasing - Development Services Scanning Project for Conversion and Indexing Services of Records with MCCI 07/07/2017 sw Risk Management Page 3 of 3 Attachment C: Bond Requirements Section 5. (B) is null for this Service Agreement. Page 1 of 1 Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Section 8. Warranty is null for this Service Agreement. Page 1 of 1 CERTIFICATE, OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of I Complete Nos. I-4 and 6 if there are interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos.1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING I Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 2017-242675 MCCi, ILLC. Tallahassee, FL United States �Date Filed: I 2 Name of qovP;in-;ntTd entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for ich the form is — 07128/2017 being filed. City of�Corplus Christi Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to be provided under the contract, 52056 Document Scanning Services 4 Nature of interest Name of Interested Party City,State,Country(place of business) (checkapplicable) Controlling intermediary Haddock, Russell Fort Wo�rth,TX United States X Barstow, Donny Taliahassee, FL United!States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVrr I swear,or affirm,undor penal,ty of perjury,that the above disclosure is true and correct, LWDSEY N THOMAS C4nw**n 9 GG 10M EVit"May 30,2021 Signature of authohzed agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP/SEAL ABOVE day of Sworn and subscribed before me,by the said -1 _Ir- this th 2 to certify which,witness my hand and seal of office. L/ ,kv, J sifnature of(�j8�administering oath Printed na of officer administering oath Title of officer 6)ministering oath 6 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission wwvv.ethics.state,lx.us Version V1.0,883 SC v NCo POPP`E� x852 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations Lawm@cctexas.com (361) 826-1972 Engineering Testing Agreement Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an engineering testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $138,900 for the Cefe. Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to authorize the selected firm to prepare the annual ground- water monitoring report as specified by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Cefe Valenzuela Landfill is the only Type 1 Municipal Solid Waste Facility to receive domestic waste and wastewater treatment plant sludge and requires a TCEQ permit to operate. Landfills are required to set up and monitor the underlying groundwater for contamination during their active life and post-closure care period. All groundwater monitoring systems must be certified by a qualified groundwater scientist and must comply with the sampling and analytical procedures outlined in the regulations. The groundwater monitoring system consists of a series of wells placed "upstream" and "downstream" of the landfill. The samples from the upstream wells show the background concentrations of constituents in the groundwater, while the downstream wells show the extent of groundwater contamination caused by the landfill. Groundwater monitoring and reporting is required twice per year under the Texas Administrative Code, Title 30, Part 1 (TCEQ), Chapter 330 Municipal Solid Waste, Subchapter J: Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action. This item provides for monitoring, analysis, and reporting including: • Collecting field samples from each of the landfill's groundwater 30 wells • Collecting field samples from six leachate collection system locations • Laboratory analysis for 17 metals, 47 volatile organic compounds, nitrate-nitrogen, ammonia-nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon • Verification re-sampling for all sample locations that exceed TCEQ allowed limits • Evaluation of the lab data and preparation of correspondence/submittals to TCEQ • Preparation and submission of the TCEQ Annual Report • Document preparation with analysis and justification to request TCEQ approval to discontinue monitoring of select metals on the basis that the tests offer little or no definitive indication as to whether a release has occurred within the landfill ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of an engineering testing agreement. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of an engineering testing agreement. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The testing agreement and selection process comply with the Professional Procurement Act and City Policy. Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. was selected based upon qualifications,wide working knowledge of applicable project fundamentals, and understanding of project requirements. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Solid Waste Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year Project to Date 2016-2017 Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS (CIP only) Budget $145,000 $145,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 138,900 138,900 Future Anticipated Expenditures This 5,437 5,437 Project BALANCE $663 $663 Fund(s): Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. in the amount of$138,900 for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Contract Location Map Presentation PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE E17070 CEFE VALENZUELA LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Landfill Operating............................................................................ 145,000 TOTAL.......................................................................................... $ 145,000 FUNDS REQUIRED: Fees: Engineering (Tolunay-Wong Engineers)............................................ 138,900 Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Engineering/Finance/Capital Budget).................. 2,175 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) ..................................... 3,263 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.)......................................................... - TOTAL.......................................................................................... $ 144,338 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE....................................... $ 663 AGREEMENT for Monitoring and Testing Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and TOLUNAY-WONG ENGINEERS, INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), actingi through its duly authorized representative who is Don R. Rokohl, P.E., Branch Manager, which agree as follows: 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 (Project No. El ("PROJECT"). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit S. 3, FEE: The City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit"A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed 1138,900. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer, However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TOLUNAY-WONG ENGINEERS, INC. _7 Jeff H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Don R. Rokohl, P. E. Date Director of Engineering Services Branch Manager 826 South Padre Island Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78416 (361) 884-5050 Office drolkohl@tweinc.com KAENGINEERMG DATAEXCHANGMANGIEWOLID WASTEd=17070 CEFE VALENZUELA LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-201851!L1215 TESTING AGREEMENT DOC Ray.I2d1916 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date Project No, E17070 Accounting Unit: 1020-12506-033 Account: 530000 Activity: E17070011020EXP Account Category. 30000 Fund Name: Solid Waste Oi)erating ATTEST' Encumbrance No. Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary KIENGINEERING DATAF-XCHARGE%NGIEM%S0LIDWASTE%El7O7O CEFE VALENZUELA LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018%115_1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev.1211&15 rolunay-wong 826 South Padre Island Drive t' Engineers, Inc. Corpus Christi,Texas 78416 Phone:(361)884-5050 September 1, 20117 TWE I-'roposal No. P17-1:099 Rev I Mr, Lawrence Mikola.jczyk Director of Solid Waste Operations City of Corpus Christi 25251-lygeia. St., 78415 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Phone: 361 826-1965 Fax: 361 826-1971 [,,a%N,r,Vl 0,,cctexas.coiu COST PROPOSAL FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT CEFE VALENZUELA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 -2018 CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS Dear iMr. NlikoIajczk: TOILInay-Wong Engineers, Inc. (TWE) is pleased to submit the 11ollowing proposal to provide groundNvater monitoring services at the above-re fere need facility for the City of Corpus Christi's (City) fiscal year of2017 to 2018. Background The Site is located Southeast of Petronila, TX, and the active area comprises approximately 300 acres. The landfill is a Type I Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) facility that receives domestic waste and wastewater treatment plant sludge. It is Currently in active status and groundwater is being monitored on a semiannual basis under the detection monitoring Program as specified in Title 30 Acliniiiisli-alive Cock (30 T4C )§330 Subchqjrter J Grotmetw(tter �Vfonitoring antl Corrective Action. Constituents being monitored under this program include metals and volatile organic compounds (VOC) listed in 40 CFR Part 258. Appendix 1. in the detection nionitoring program for this facility, groundwater analytical results are compared to back(lrOUnd concentrations that have been determined on an intrawell basis. Statistical background concentrations are current LIP through 2016 and will not require any additional updates until Fiscal Year 2018 - 4:7 2019. Objective The objective of this projJect is to implement the Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan (GWSAP) which outlines the City Of Corpus Christi's program for groundwater monitoring in accordance with the requirements of 30 T-IC S'ubchql)1er J. The groundwater-monitoring, program includes consistent sampling and analysis procedures that are designed to ensure monitoring results that provide an accurate representation Of 81-01.indwater quality at the Cef'c Valerizuela facility. EXHIBIT"A" Page 1 of 3 Mr. Lawrence Mikolajczyk TWE Proposal No. P I 7-EO99 September 1, 2017 Page 2 Scope of Work The Scope of Work includes four tasks I. Semiannual Detection Monitoring of the 30 monitoring wells (MW 1-1.9, 40-46 plus deep wells MW-213, MW-IIB, MW-12B and MW-1313) for the 15 total metals and volatile organic compounds specified in the current GWSAP. In keeping with prior years of groundwater monitoring, iron, manganese,nitrate-nitrogen, ammonia-nitrogen,and dissolved organic carbon will be analyzed to facilitate the identification of geochernical processes that can mobilize metals, and which may assist with preparing alternate source demonstrations when background is exceeded in a well. In addition, 6 samples (3 per event) will be collected from the landfill leachate collection system to characterize the waste in terms of monitored constituents. This will also assist in preparation of alternate source demonstrations and contaminant fate and transport modeling. 2. Verification re-sampling for wells that exceed the statistically determined background concentration limit. 3. Evaluation of detection monitoring data, identification and reporting of SSIs or alternate sources, preparation of correspondence and submittals to, TCEQ, including the Annual Report. TWE will transmit two hard copies and I electronic copy of the report to the City and three hard copies to the TCEQ. 4. Petition TCEQ for permission to discontinue monitoring certain metals on the basis that they offer little or no definitive indication as to whether a release has occurred. Schedule Based on the City's fiscal year schedule and negotiations with TCEQ,TWE proposes to conduct the two semiannual sampling events in October 2017 and April 2018. The 2017 Annual report will be issued in January 2018. The period between the 2nd semiannual sampling event of 2017 and the Annual Report will allow for up to two verification sampling events along with data review and incorporation of results into the Annual Report. The period following the I' semiannual event of 2018 will also be utilized for verification sampling if required. Each semiannual sampling event is expected to take about one working week to complete with analytical turnaround time (TAT) requiring two working weeks. Verification sampling, if required, is expected to take no more than three days for each event with analytical TAT again requiring two working weeks. Proposed Protect Costs TWE will conduct the investigation on a time and material basis for a not-,to-exceed base price of $138,,900. A cost breakdown for the major tasks is summarized below. EXHIBIT"All Page 2 of Mr. Lawrcnce Mikola.iczyk TWE Proposal No. t'17-17,'099 September 1, 2017 I'aL, ,e 3 Field Sampling Activities (ilICILides 2 Verification Saniplin(g, Events) Labor S 7,40( O ODCs S 6,300 Analvtical S 33,000 R e I)o i-t i i i:.� S 36,l 00 Petition TCEQ to DiSCOnfillUe Metals Monitoring S 13.600 Project Management $ 12.500 Project Total S 138,900 Limitations The proposal presented above, inClUding the Scope of Work and schedule, is C011tillgerit Upon the following aSSLI111ptiOlIS: • TWE will have necessary access to the site, • I-eve] D Personal Protective [''C]Uipment is adeqUatC, • Ne-otiations and/or mectim,s with TCEQ For any other issues related to the scope of work as OUtlined in this proposal will not be reqUirccl. • Unanticipated delays beyond TWE's control will constitute a change order and will be billed according,to the attached 1'ee schedule. Closing Remark If YOU have any qLICS6011S or need additional information, please contact me at (713) 722-7064 or by c-rnail at drokohI0,4wciuc.cotn, Sincerely, Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. Don Rokolil, I".E. Mark Brotherton, P.G. Corpus Christi Branch N/lana-er Sr. Project Manager Environmental Services Division EXHIBIT"A" Page 3 of J, EXHIBIT B TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating, where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area:subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request,submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration., Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for, a period of two years following submission of any reports, during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 1.7 Pay salaries, wages, expenses, social security taxes,federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES:City Engineer or designee will: 2.11 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 2,.2 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials, are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the Citys representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed' under this,Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority concerning the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. 2.5 Direct the Project contractor,either by the Construction Contract or direct written order,to: (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Fumish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; EXHIBIT 111311 Page 1 of 6 (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to,during and up to 60,days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not In any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer,will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling,testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services. The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and It is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement, Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 42 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain,the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample, Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non-hazardous samples, and return hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples'containers. ARTICLE 5. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skull ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under the same or similar conditions. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully Indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and Its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property Infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while In the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This Indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent, acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court EXHIBIT 111311 Page 2 of 6 costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability.. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each Invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Lab must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Lab must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Lab must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the sinned a reement(or amendment)2 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI)with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager, The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General Liability and Auto Liability policies,and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COL Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COL TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-written day notice of cancellation, required Bodily Injury and Property damage on all certificates or by applicable policy Per occurrence aggregate endorsements Commercial General Liability including: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence 1. Commercial Broad Form $2,000,000 Aggregate 2. Premises Operations 3. Products/Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal)Injury-Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY(including) $500,000 Combined Single Limit 1. Owned 2'. Hired and Non-Owned 3. Rented/Leased PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY $1,000,000 Per Claim (Errors and Omissions) $2,000,000 Aggregate (Defense costs must be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended EXHIBIT"B" Page 3 of 6 reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. WORKERS'COMPENSATION Statutory (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability $500,000/$500,0001$500,000 8.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Lab must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Applicable for paid employees, Lab must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Lab will be promptly met. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Lab is not domiciled in the State of Texas. 8.5 Lab shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lab's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Lab Is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 8.6 Lab shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lab shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi,TX 78469-9277 8.7 Lab agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: (a) List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City,with the exception of the workers'compensation policy and professional liabilftylErrors&Omissions policy,; (b) Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; (c) Workers" compensation and employers' liability policies, will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City;and (d) Provide thirty(30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non- renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (110) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 8.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non-renewal of coverage, Lab shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend EXHIBIT"B" Page 4 of Lab's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lab's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lab to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Lab hereunder until Lab demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof, 810 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lab may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lab's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.11 It is agreed that Lab's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8,12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws,, Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nuece:s County, Texas, ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 11.1 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required, 11,2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at bLtps s:�/www.ethics.state.tx.us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at httoJ/www.cctexas.com1 2yeLnmeitic gc[etffy"L nflict-disclasurehndex, ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim. 12,2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 131 This Agreement, including Exhibit"A" and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes aH prior negotiation, representations or agreements,written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these Terms and Conditions are controlling. EXHIBIT"B Page 5 of 13.2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default, 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice,the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore, to include any review of, or responsibility for,the adequacy of the Project's general contractor's safety measures in,on or near the Project site. EXHIBIT"B" Page 6 of Sample form for: Payment Request COMPLETE PROJECT NAME AE Contract Project No.XXXX Revised 02101/17 Invoice No.12346 Invoice Date 01101!12017 Total Current Previous Total Remaining Percent Basic Services: Contract Am,d No..1 Amd No.2 Contract Invoice Invoice Invoice Balance Complete Preliminary Phase $1,000.00 $0.00 KOO $1,000.00 $0.00 $1'000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 100.0% Design Phase $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 $1,000.00 $500,00 $1,500,00 $1,500.00 50.0% Bid Phase $500,00 $0.00 $250.00 $760.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $750.00 0.0% Construction Phase $2,,600.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $5,600-00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00, $3,500.00 0.0% Subtotal Basic Services $6,000.001 $1,000.001-"$1,250.001 $8,250.00 $1,000.001 $1,500.001 $2,500.00, $5,750.00 30.3'% Additional Services- I Permitting $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 25.0% Warranty Phase $000 $1,120.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 0.0%, Inspection, KOO MOO $1,627.00 $1,627.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.001 $1,627.00 0.0% Platting Survey TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0&M Manuals TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD SCADA TBDI TBDI TBDI TBD -TBDI TBD TBD TBD' TBD Subtotal Additional Services $2,000.001 $1,120.001 $1,627,001 $4,747.00 $500.001 $0.00 $500.00 $4,247.00 10.5% Summary of Fees: Basic Services Fees $6,0=00 $1,000.00 $1,250.001 $8,250.00 $1,000.00 1 $1,500�,00 $2,500.00 $5,750.00 30.3�% Additional Services Fees $2,00U0 $1,120�.00 1 $1,627.0101 $4,747.00 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00 $4,247.001 10.5% Total of Fees $8,000.00 $2,120.001 $2,877.001 $12 Q'997.000 =$1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,00000 1 $9,997.001 23.,1%1 m Notes: X IF needed, update this sample form based on the contract requirements. If applicable,refer to the contract for information on what to include with time and materials(T&M). CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE INTEREST City of Ch '� City Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended,requires all persons or firms seeking to o buofsiness with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not a plicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements,Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: Tolunay-Wong Engineers,Inc. P.0.BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 826 South Padre.Island Drive CITY. Corpus Christi ZIPS 784116 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 2.. Partnership 3, Sete Owner 4. Association 5. Other DISCLOSURE QUESTION'S If additional space is necessary,please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm. Name ,lob Title and City III A Department(if known) 2. State the names of each"official"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"' constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.," Name Title 1 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm.' Name Board, Commission or t�III Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an 'ownership interest"constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm.' Name 14 A Consultant FELIN+G REQUIREI TENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof,you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official,emplo_yyee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City of ficial or employee in the matter is apparent, The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing fled with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349(d.)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information resluested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi,Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person; Don R.Rokohl,P.E. Title: Hrancb Manager (rYpe or Print) Signature of Certifying12 .,. 1; Date: c w Person: �..., DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. ":Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi,Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation,joint stock company,joint venture,receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas. f "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies,or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g "Consultant."Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 10f1 Complete Nos. 1-4 and 6 if there are interested parties, OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos. 1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 2017-258218 Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is 09/0812017 being filed. City of Corpus Christi Date Acknowledged- 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to he provided under the contract. E1707'0 Groundwater Monitoring at Cefe Valenzuela Municipal Landfill for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Nature of interest Name of Interested Party City,State,Country(place of business) (check applicable) Controlling intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear,or affirm,under penalty of perjury,that the above disclosure is true and correct, P %* P UL Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity !'S AFFIX NOTAR r IM I OVE iV S ,_and subscribed before me by the said this the day of�J 2,woT Tto certity which,witness my hand and seal of office., Of ,41, 'Nigne'ure of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www,ethics.state.tx,us Version V1,0.3337 N SCALE: N.T.S. NUECES RNER azo NUECES BAY ANNAALLE 77 3 U P CORPUS CHRISTI opy� o � LEOPARD O a' ROBSTOWN z u 44 CORPUS CHRISTI O �� 288 INTERNATIO AIRPORT OAZ 358 5 N N N CORPUS CHRISTI a r n F n 0 Spl O p TEXAS A&M CORPUS UNIVERSITY CORPU CS CHRI Y 358 CABA ISS 1 ", Z OSO BAY FIELD 665 43 p DO 288 w P yQ 4 U" ? O 2444 3 PROJECT LOCATION LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Number: E17070 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT Groundwater Monitoring CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 2017 201 Corpus Chr sti Engineering Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 Council Presentation September 19, 2017 Project Location Corpus Chr"sti Engineering CEFE VALENZUELA LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018 Project Vicinity Corpus Chr sti Engineering CEFE VALENZUELA LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018 Project Scope Corpus Chr sti Engineering Project includes: • Groundwater sampling from 30 wells and the leachate collection system twice yearly • Laboratory testing of each sample for 17 metals, volatile organic compounds, nitrate -nitrogen, ammonia -nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon • Verification re -sampling for samples that exceed the statistically determined concentration limit • Analysis of lab data for TCEQ compliance • Annual Reporting to TCEQ • Petition to TCEQ for permission to discontinue monitoring certain metals Project Schedule Project Estimate: 365 Calendar Days N 12 Months Corpus Chr"sti Engineering 5 SC v NCo POPP`E x852 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations Lawm@cctexas.com (361) 826-1972 Engineering Testing Agreement J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an engineering testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $131,500 for the J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to authorize the selected firm to prepare the annual ground- water monitoring report as specified by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The JC Elliott Landfill is a Type 1 Municipal Solid Waste Facility and is currently in a post-closure care. Landfills are required to set up and monitor the underlying groundwater for contamination during their active life and post-closure care period. All groundwater monitoring systems must be certified by a qualified groundwater scientist and must comply with the sampling and analytical procedures outlined in the regulations. The groundwater monitoring system consists of a series of wells placed "upstream" and "downstream" of the landfill. The samples from the upstream wells show the background concentrations of constituents in the groundwater, while the downstream wells show the extent of groundwater contamination caused by the landfill. Groundwater monitoring and reporting is required twice per year under the Texas Administrative Code, Title 30, Part 1 (TCEQ), Chapter 330 Municipal Solid Waste, Subchapter J: Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action. This item provides for monitoring, analysis, and reporting including: • Collecting field samples from each of the landfill's groundwater 23 wells • Collecting field samples from six leachate collection system locations • Laboratory analysis for 17 metals, 47 volatile organic compounds, nitrate-nitrogen, ammonia-nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon • Verification re-sampling for all sample locations that exceed TCEQ allowed limits • Evaluation of the lab data and preparation of correspondence/submittals to TCEQ • Preparation and submission of the TCEQ Annual Report • Document preparation with analysis and justification to request TCEQ approval to discontinue monitoring of select metals on the basis that the tests offer little or no definitive indication as to whether a release has occurred within the landfill ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of an engineering testing agreement. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of an engineering testing agreement. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The testing agreement and selection process comply with the Professional Procurement Act and City Policy. Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. was selected based upon qualifications,wide working knowledge of applicable project fundamentals, and understanding of project requirements. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Solid Waste Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year Project to Date 2016-2017 Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS (CIP only) Budget $140,000 $140,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 131,500 131,500 Future Anticipated Expenditures This 5,250 5,250 Project BALANCE $3,250 $3,250 Fund(s): Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. in the amount of$131,500 for the J. C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Contract Location Map Presentation PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE E17071 JC ELLIOTT LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Landfill Operating......................................................................................... $ 140,000 TOTAL...................................................................................................... 140,000 FUNDS REQUIRED: Fees: Engineering (Tolunay-Wong Engineers)........................................................ 131,500 Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Engineering/Finance/Capital Budget).............................. 2,100 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt).................................................. 3,150 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.)..................................................................... 0 TOTAL...................................................................................................... 136,750 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE................................................... $ 3,250 AGREEMENT for Monitoring and Testing Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duty authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and TOLUNAY-WONG ENGINEERS, INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), acting through its duly authorized representative who is Don R. Rokohl, P.E. Branch Manager,which agree as follows, 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 ftolect,.No. E11,7071) ("PROJECT"). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit B. 3. FEE: The,City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit"A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed $1131,600. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE, OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND, CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer. However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TOLUNAY-1NONG ENGINEERS, INC., Jeff H. Edmonds, P.E, Date Don R. Rolkohl, P. E. Date Director of Engineering Services Branch Manager 826 South Padre Island Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78416 (361) 884-5050 Office drokohl@tweinc,com KENGNEERING DATAEXCHANGRANGIENSOUD WASTEXE17071 JG ELLIOTT LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018%151215 TESTING AGREEMEN-mor, Rev.12115115 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date Project No. E17071 Accounting Unit: 1020-12530-033 Account: 530000 Activity: El,707'101 1020EXP Account Category- 30000 ATTEST Fund Name: Solid Waste Operating Encumbrance No- Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary KZNGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE%ANGIEMISOLID WASTE)EI7071 JC ELLIOTT LANDFILL,GROUNDWATER MONITORIN,GFY2017-2018%15-1215TE$TINGAOREEMENT.DOC Rev.12JISOIS Toltinay-Wong 826 South Padre Island Drive Engineers, Ine. Corpus Christi,Texas 78416 Phone:(361)884-5050 September 1, 2017 TWF', Proposal No. 1117-E100 Rev I Nit.. Lawrence Mikolajczyk Director of Solid Waste Operations City of Corpus Christi 25251-lyi,cia St., 78,415 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Phone: 361 826-1965 Fax: 361 826-1971 La%vkl4�)ccte�. a.scom COST' PROPOSAL FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING ATJ C ELLIOTT MUNICIPAL LANDFILL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 - 2018 CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS Deal, Mr. Mikola.jczyk: TolUnay-Wong Engineers. Inc. (TWE) is pleased to submit the lbllowimy proposal to provide groundwater monitoring services at the above-referenced facility for the City of Corpus Christi's (city) fiscal year of"20i 7 to 2018. Back The Site is located at 7001 Ayers St, C01-PUS Christi, Texas and comprises approximately 3)13) acres. The landfill is a 1'ype I Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) facility that received domestic Nvaste and wastewater treatment plant sludges. It is currently ill post-closure care and the groundwater is being monitored can a semiannual basis under the detection monitoring program as specified in Title 30 Atimbfis1rative Cmic (30 T4C )§330 Subcheilwer J GrountAipaler 1foj7iioring otul Corrective Action, Constituents being monitored under this program include metals and volatile organic compounds (VOC) listed in 40 CFR Part 258, Appendix 1. For the detection monitoring program at this facility, -1-01.1ndwater analytical results are compared to background concentrations that have been determined on all intrawell basis. Statistical background concentrations are current up through 2016 and will not require any additional updates until Fiscal Year 2018 - 2019. Objective The obJectivc of this project is to implement the, Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan (CjWSAP) which outlines the City's program for -1-01.1ndwater monitoring in accordance with the requirements of 30 TAC,S'0chalwei-J. The groundwater-monitoring program includes consistent sampling and analysis procedures that are designed to ensure monitoring results that provide an accurate representation of groundwater duality at the J C Elliott facility. EXHIBIT"A Page 1 of Mr. Lawrence Mikolajezyk TWE Proposal No. P 17-E 100 September 1, 2017 Page 2 Scope of Work The Scope of Work includes four tasks 1. Semiannual Detection Monitoring of the 23 monitoring wells (Wells MW 1-2,4-5,7, 12, 16- 32) for the 15 total metals and volatile organic compounds specified in the current GWSAP. In keeping with prior years of groundwater monitoring, iron, manganese, nitrate-nitrogen, ammonia-nitrogen, and dissolved organic carbon will be analyzed to facilitate the identification of geochemical processes that can mobilize metals, and which may assist with preparing alternate source demonstrations when background is exceeded in a well. In addition, 6 samples (3 per event) will be collected from the landfill leachate collection system to characterize the waste in terms of monitored constituents. This will also assist in preparation of alternate source demonstrations and contaminant fate and transport modeling,. 2. Verification re-sampling for wells that exceed the statistically determined background concentration limit. 3. Evaluation of detection monitoring data, identification and reporting of SSIs or alternate sources, preparation of correspondence and submittals to TCEQ, including the Annual Report. TWE will transmit two hard copies and I electronic copy of the report to the City of Corpus Christi and three hard copies to the TCEQ 4. Petition TCEQ for permission to discontinue monitoring certain metals on the basis that they offer little or no definitive indication as to whether a release has occurred. Schedule Based on the City's fiscal year schedule and negotiations with TCEQ TWE proposes to conduct the two semiannual sampling events in November 2017 and May 2018. The 2017 Annual report will be issued in February 2018. The period between the 2nd semiannual sampling event of 2017 and the Annual Report will allow for up to two verification sampling events along with data review and incorporation of results into the Annual Report. The period following the I` semiannual event of 2018 will also be utilized for verification sampling if required. Each semiannual sampling event is expected to take about one working week to complete with analytical turnaround time (TAT) requiring two working weeks. Verification sampling, if required, is expected to take no more than three days for each event with analytical TAT again requiring two working weeks. Proposed Proiect Costs TWE will conduct the investigation on a time and material basis for a not-to-exceed base price of $131,500. A cost breakdown for the major tasks is summarized below. Field Sampling Activities(includes 2 Verification Sampling Events) Labor $ 33,600 ODCs $ 6,300 EXHIBIT"All Page 2 of 3 i%/Ir. Lam-ence Mikola.iczyk TW E Proposal No. P I 7-1:x;100 September 1, 2017 Paoe 3 Analytical $ 31,300 Reportil](T 31.100 Petition TCEO to Discontinue Metals Monitorim-7 13,600 Project Management $ 15.600 Project Total S 131,500 Limitations The proposal presented above. including the Scope of'Work and schedule, is contingent UPOn the following assumptions: • TWE will have necessary access to the site. ® Level D Personal Protective Equipment is adequate. • Negotiations and/or mectings with TCEQ I`or tiny other issues related to the scope of' work as outlined in this proposal will not be required. • Unanticipated delays beyond TWFI-s cO11trOf Will Constitute a change order and will be billed according to the attached I`ce schedule. Closing Remarks If you have any ClUCStiO11S or need additional itillormation, please contact me at (36 1) 884-5050 or by e-mail at(frokohl6i)hveinc.com. Sincerely, Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. v, Don Rokohl, P.E. Mark Brotherton, P.G. Corpus Christi Branch Manager Sr. Project Manager Environmental Services Division EXHIBIT"A:' Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT B TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the CRY Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating,where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed,, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request, submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration. Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for a period of two years following submission of any reports,during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 17 Pay salaries,,wages, expenses, :social security taxes,federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: City Engineer or designee will: 2.1 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 22 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the City's representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed under this Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority concerning the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. 2.6 Direct the Project contractor,either by the Construction Contract or direct written order,to: (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Furnish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; FEXH�IBITIOIIBII Page1 Page 1 of 6, (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to,during and up to 60 days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not in any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities,with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling,testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services, The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and it is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with, the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement. Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 4.2 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample. Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non-hazardous samples, and return hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples'containers. ARTICLE S. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under the same or similar conditions. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or resutts, from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court EXHIBIT"B" Page 2 of 6 costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Lacs must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Lab must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Lab must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement for amendment) 2 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI)with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General Liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed In Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE-COVERAGE 80-written day notice of cancellation, required Bodily Injury and Property Damage on all certificates or by applicable policy Per occurrence- aggregate endorsements Commercial General Liability including: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence 1. Commercial Broad Form $2,000,000 Aggregate 2. Premises_Operations 3. Products/Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury-Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY(including) $500,000 Combined Single Limit 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non-Owned 3. Rented/Leased PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY $1,000,000 Per Claim (Errors and Omissions) $2,000,000 Aggregate (Defense costs must be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended EXHIBIT`'`B" Page 3 of 6 reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. WORKERS"COMPENSATION Statutory (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability $500.0001/$500,000 1$500,000 8,3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Lab must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Applicable for paid employees, Lab must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Lab will be promptly met. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Lab is not domiciled in the State of Texas. 8.5 Lab shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof,at Lab's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Bests rating of no less than A-VII. Lab is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. &6 Lab shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lab shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes.All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the foliowing address: City of Corpus Christ! Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 8.7 Lab agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: (a) List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City,with the exception of the workers'compensation policy and professional liability/Errors&Omissions policy; (b) Provide for an, endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; (c) Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and (d) Provide thirty(30)calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non- renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10)calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 8.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non-renewal of coverage, Lab shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements,to City. City shall have the option to suspend EXHIBIT 1111311 Page 4 of ti Lab's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lab's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lab to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or, withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Lab hereunder until Lab demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 810 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lab may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lab's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.11 It is agreed that Lab"s insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8.12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 111 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required. 11.2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at http.s,/�/v��ww.ethicc.statejx.us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CICS, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at iscIosure/index. ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim, 12.2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shalt be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence, ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13,11 This Agreement, including Exhibit"A" and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes Mi prior negotiation, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these, Terms and Conditions are controlling. EXHIBIT"B" Page 5 of 6 13-2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default. 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice, the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore,to include any review of, or responsibility for, the adequacy of the Project's general contractors safety measures in,on or near the Project site. EXHIBIT"B" Page 6 of Sample form for Payment Request COMPLETE PROJECT NAME AE contract Project No.XXXX Revised 02/01117 Invoice No.12346 Invoice Date 0110112017 Total Current Previous Total Remaining Percent Basic Services: Contract Amd!No.1 Amd No.2 Contract Invoice Invoice Invoice Balance Complete Preliminary Phase $1,000.001 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.001 $,1,000.00 $0.00 10.0.0% Design Phase $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 $1,000.00, $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 50.0% Bid Phase $500.00 $0.00 $250.00 $750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $750.00 U% Construction Phase $2,500.00 $0.00 $1,000,00 $3,500.00 $0,00 s0-00 $0,00 $3,500.00 0.0% Subtotal Basic Services $6,000.00 $1,000.001 $1,250,001 $8,250.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.001 $2,600.00 $5,750.00 30.3% Additional Services: Permitting $2,0001,00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 25.0% Warranty Phase $0.00 $1,120.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 $0.001 $0.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 0.0+% Inspection $0.00 $0.00 $1,627.00 $1,627.00 WOO $0.00 $0.00 $1,627.00_ 0.0% Platting Survey TBD TBD TBD TSD -TBD, TBD TSD TBD TBD 0&M Manuals TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD I TBD TBD TBD TBD SCADA TBD TBD I BD TBD TBD L TBDI 'TBD TBD TBD Subtotal Additional Services $2,000.001 $1,120.001 $11,6327.00 $4,747.00 $500-001 $0.001 $500.00 $4,247.00 10.5% Summary of Fees: Basic Services Fees $6,000.00 $1,0100:001 $1,250.001 $8,,250.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.001 $2,500.00 $5,750.00 30.3% Additional Services Fees $2,000.00 $1,120.00 $1,627.001 $4,747.00 -$500.00 $0.001 $500.00 $4,247.00 10.5% Total of Fees $I3,000.00 $2.120.00 $2,877.00L$12,997.00 1 $1,500.00 $1,500,00 $3,000,00 $9,997.001 23.1% Notes: if needed,update this sample form based on the contract requirements. If applicable,refer to the contract for information on what to Include with time and materials(T&M), CITY 01F CORPUS CHRISTI ® DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Cj�ea City of Carpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended,requires all persons or firms seeking to o business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA"". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and denitions. COMPANY NAME: Tolunay-Wong Engineers,Inc. P.0.BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 826 South Padre Island Drive CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78416 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 2. Partnership 3. Sole Owner 4. Association 5. Other DISCLOSURE QiUESTIC}NS If additional space is necessary,please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.. 1. State the names of each `employee"" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest'"constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm., Name Job Title and City Department(if known) 2. State the names of each"official"of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"' constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest"constituting 3^%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm." Name 1149 Consultant person who requests official action on a matter knows F If a p q that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof,you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official,emplo ee or body that hos been requested to act in the matter,unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349(d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi,Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Dain R.Rokohl,P.E. Title: Branch 1'1+tanaizer _. ( "c or Print) Signature of CertifyingDate: 17, M Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is Likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi,Texas either on a full or part-time basis,but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership,corporation,joint stock company,joint venture,receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas. f "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies,or special terms of venture or,partnership agreements." g. "Consultant."Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. N SCALE: N.T.S. MVECES RA" e24 NUECES BAY ANNAALLE 77 U y P 00 CORPUS CHRISTI LEOPARD D a ROBSTOWN z 44 CORPUS CHRISTI �< 288 INTERNA AIRPORTTO 388 N ' a CORPUS CHRISTI BAY w m e ro n F p Sp ^ TEAS A&M UN CORPUS SRY CORPVS CHRISTI Y 388 Iss �y OSO BAY CORC\\C%^\\"'V"PUS c FIELDQ NAVAL AIR 888 43 FLOUR BLUFf 388 aas J �p,O 2444 V 3 PROJECT LOCATION LAGUNA LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Number: E17071 JC Elliott Landfill CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT Groundwater Monitoring CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 2017 201 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 10f1 Complete Nos,I-4 and 6 if there are interested parties, OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos.1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING I Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 2017-258221 Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc, Corpus Christi, TX United States Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is— 09/08/2017 being filed. City of Corpus Christi Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to be provided under the contract., E17071 Groundwater Monitoring at J C Elliott Municipal Landfill for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 4 Nature of:interest Name of Interested Party City,State,Country(place of business) (check applicable) Controlling intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. Btltlf 6 AFFIDAVIT Ix I swear,or affirm,under penalty of perjury,that the above disclosure is true and correct. P*pJ 4",E O�r Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity ..... XN AFFIX NOTARY*"#J711XiL\\<OVE Sworn to and subscribed before me,by the said this the day of 20 rl to certify which,witness my hand and seal of office. 1k,s iqpature of-61ficer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 Corpus Chr sti Engineering J.C. Elliott Landfill Groundwater Monitoring FY 2017-2018 Council Presentation September 19, 2017 Project Location Corpus Chr"sti Engineering JC ELLIOTT LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING FY 2017-2018 Project Vicinity Corpus Chr sti Engineering JC ELLIOTT LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORINT FY 2017-2018 Project Scope Corpus Chr sti Engineering Project includes: • Groundwater sampling from 23 wells and the leachate collection system twice yearly • Laboratory testing of each sample for 17 metals, volatile organic compounds, nitrate -nitrogen, ammonia -nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon • Verification re -sampling for samples that exceed the statistically determined concentration limit • Analysis of lab data for TCEQ compliance • Annual Reporting to TCEQ • Petition to TCEQ for permission to discontinue monitoring certain metals Project Schedule Corpus Chr"sti Engineering Oct 2017 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 2018 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Project Estimate: 365 Calendar Days N 12 Months 5 se o� � AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 NORPOR PE 1852 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 19, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations LawM(Pcctexas.com (361)826-1972 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services — Purchasing Division KimB26a�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems at Landfills CAPTION: Resolution finding that the purchase and upgrade of software and equipment for the Solid Waste Department's scale systems is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with A-1 Scale Service, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, for upgrades of the scale system software and equipment for a total amount not to exceed $85,600.00, with funding available in the FY2016-2017 General Fund. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to appropriate funds to execute a contract with A-1 Scale Service, Inc. for unattended unit stations and upgrades. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: After 10 years of operation and exposure to a harsh environment, the pole mounted stainless steel cabinets and computer hardware located adjacent to the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill scales needs to be replaced. The 4 units are integral components of the automated scale system, which allows landfill customers to complete scale transactions without leaving their vehicles. Note that this automated scale system provides the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill a competitive advantage, as customers benefit from the efficient automated scale operation. To coincide with updating the scale hardware, the Mettler Toledo scale software system will be upgraded with the latest version of Auto Scale. The upgrade will expand scale system capabilities and help ensure uninterrupted scale operations for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill as well as the JC Elliott Transfer Station. The scale system is a critical component of landfill operations and serves as the basis for billing landfill customers. Annually, approximately 90,000 scale transactions bring the City $8.7 million in revenue. The department places a high priority in assuring that the landfill and transfer station scale operating systems are reliable and accurate. The orderly scheduling of this work in advance of a system failure is advisable to maintain excellent customer service and a consistent revenue stream. A-1 Scale Service and Mettler Toledo have a long history of providing outstanding support and service to the City's landfill and transfer station scale operations. ALTERNATIVES: Delaying the replacement of this equipment and software upgrade is possible, but may increase the likelihood of scale system downtime, creating delays for customers and increasing the potential for landfill billing issues. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: N/A CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non-emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Solid Waste FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $4,980,185.02 $0 $4,980,185.02 Encumbered / Expended Amount $3,974,671.36 $0 $3,974,671.36 This item $85,600.00 $0 $85,600.00 BALANCE $919,913.66 $0 $919,913.66 Fund(s): General Fund Comments: The initial service agreement's total is $85,600.00, which is funded for FY2016-17. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the proposed amendment. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Resolution Pricing Sheet Resolution finding that the purchase and upgrade of software and equipment for the Solid Waste Department's scale systems is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with A-1 Scale Service, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, for upgrades of the scale system software and equipment for a total amount not to exceed $85,600.00, with funding available in the FY2016-2017 General Fund. WHEREAS, the upgrade of software and equipment will be purchased for use by the Solid Waste Department; WHEREAS, this upgrade of software and equipment will assist the Solid Waste Department in daily operation and provide scale system capabilities that help ensure uninterrupted scale operations; WHEREAS, State law provides that such procurements, as outlined above, are subject to statutory procurement requirements, including competitive bids, unless an exception applies; WHEREAS, there is also a statutory exception for this procurement in Local Government Code, Section 252.022(a) (7) (A), as this purchase is available from only one source due to special processes or patents. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: Section 1. The City Council specifically finds that the foregoing statements included in the preamble of this resolution are true and correct and adopts such findings for all intents and purposes related to the authorization of this procurement. Section 2. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute a service agreement for the purchase and upgrade of software and equipment for Solid Waste Department's scale systems from A-1 Scale Service, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, based on a sole source for a total amount not to exceed $85,600.00. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Mayor City Secretary Corpus Christi, Texas day of 20 Page 1 of 2 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Mayor Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey-Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PRICE SHEET PURCHASING DIVISION SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES FOR SOLID BUYER: MICHAEL GUTIERREZ WASTE SCALE SYSTEMS A-1 Scale Services, Inc. San Antonio, Texas ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. I UNIT UNIT PRICE EXTENDED TOTAL 1. Unattended Unit Station 4 Each $16,050.00 $64,200.00 2. Software Update 1 Each $18,000.00 $18,000.00 3 Configuration and Scale Calibration 2 Each $1,700.00 $3,400.00 TOTAL $85,600.00 s c. 0 H SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 52711 '''o-ewasnE° Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems at Landfills THIS Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems at Landfills Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation ("City") and A-1 Scale Service, Inc. ("Contractor'), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems at Landfills in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. N/A ("RFB/RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Scale Systems at Landfills ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for two months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to zero additional zero-month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $85,600.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in City of Corpus Christi Page 1 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Paul Bass Department: Solid Waste Phone: 361-826-1968 Email: PaulB@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and City of Corpus Christi Page 2 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. City of Corpus Christi Page 3 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Paul Bass Title: Assistant Director of Support Services Address: 2525 Hygeia, Corpus Christi, TX 78415 Fax: 361-826-1971 IF TO CONTRACTOR: A-1 Scale Service, Inc. Attn: Chris Buchhorn Title: Project Manager Address: 4807 N.W. Industrial Dr. San Antonio, TX 78238 Fax: 210-521-1333 City of Corpus Christi Page 4 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 17. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. City of Corpus Christi Page 5 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1 ) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes City of Corpus Christi Page 6 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Page 7 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: P Date: 3 / CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1 : RFB/RFP No. N/A Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response City of Corpus Christi Page 8 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 711116 Attachment A: Scope of Work 1. General Requirements/Background Information The Contractor shall provide software and equipment upgrades for Solid Waste Operations' Cefe Valenzuela Landfill and JC Elliott Transfer Station scale systems as outlined in this scope of work. 2. Scope of Work A. At the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, the Contractor will remove and replace the stainless steel enclosures and computer hardware for the four "unattended unit stations" originally installed in 2007. Each station must include card reading devices, keyboards, thermal printers, and other features that will enable Cefe Landfill customers to complete scale transactions without leaving their vehicles. New scale system interface software must be included. B. The Contractor will update the Auto Scale software to the latest configuration on devices located at the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, J.C. Elliot Transfer Station, and City Hall. C. The Contractor will remove outdated scale indicators at the J.C. Elliott Transfer Station and replace them with new indicators, including installation, configuration, and calibration. D. The installation of scale hardware and software will be completed over a three day period and sequenced to assure continuous scale operations at the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill and the JC Elliott Transfer Station. 3. Delivery A. All equipment and supplies will be shipped to A-1 Scale Service. Inc. San Antonio, Texas 78238, then transported by A-1 Scale Service to the scale locations for installation. • Cefe Valenzuela Landfill - 2397 County Road 20 Robstown, Texas 78380 • J.C. Elliot Transfer Station - 6594 Greenwood Dr. Corpus Christi, Texas 78415 Page 1 of 2 The primary contact will be Tony Benavides 361-826-1633 for both locations. If Tony Benavides is unavailable, Andy Montes 361-826-1631 will be the secondary contact. B. Defective Goods Contractor shall pay for return shipment on any products that arrive in a defective, unusable or inoperable condition. Contractor must arrange for the return shipment of damaged products. 4. Contractor Quality Control and Superintendence The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Contractor will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirements. Page 2 of 2 IS X7025 Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Accredited lrrlt Testing and Calibration A-1 Scale Authorized D'istributor Certificate 1902.01 4807 N.W. Industrial Dr, San Antonio,Tx, 713238 Serving South and Mettler Toledo Distributor Plionie (210)521.-7848 Fax 12101 521-1333 Central Texas Field Representative WWW.AISCALE.COM Since 1981 Cite of Corpus Christi Solid Waste 2525 Hyeia St. Corpus Christi, T RE: Unattended Unit Software and.Equipment Upgrade Attn: Paul Bass I have included detailed information about the features of the products that are pari of the optimal solution to your application:, process and business demands. METTLER TOLEDO products represent a valuable combination ofperfon-nance, accuracy and precision. In addition, our field service organization is comprised of factory-certified technicians who are trained to meet high equality standards. You can also log on to www.mt_coi for up-to-date application and operation details. Vehicle Scale and Related Instrumentation Qty. (4)Model ll~D UOf2 10003 0 Unattended Unit Stations ......................5 64,200.00 Net Price �r `�irr1'�r�lr���lr"�31�%fi'��Sf��/�vr�'rj�) li��J�r�/%f3 � �>'�yl�ll,�I'I�rl • Auto Scale Software Interfacet,; ® IND780 Scale. Indicator with Powercell MTX Scale Interface �J?r,'Jf�I1 ��i, • 65 Ke SS keyboard• «f i% r, �. Key �' ��ff� iir 11��(�36fi��l l� Star Thermal Printer jf<<r } • Proximity Card Reader r"�f �� �^� ® Slim Stainless-Steel Enclosure with Heater and. Iran t ��� No Intercom Feature '° s(� No 1/0 a ��� u7, ..,,.��' .,.�,� Instrumentation entatiorn. Software Update �< Software Updated to Latest Auto Scale Configuration ................................$ 1.8,000.00 Net price ® Locations: ® Cefe ® Elliot • Downtown Corpus Christi ® All Updates will hiterface to New Unattended Units . Updates includes all removal of existing Unattended Units and Jag- treme Indicators in scale house and the Installation, Config-oration and Calibration of New Unattended Units. Page 1 of 2 I X 11 1S 17025 Accredited METTt 8 lEDO Testing and.Calibration A-1 Scale Service, lautlroriaetl Distrebutor... Certificate 1902.01 48071°x.W. Industrial Dr. sats , :tttollia,Tx. 78238 Serving South and Mettler Toledo Distributor phone ( 10)521-7848 Fax ( 10) 521•4333 Central Texas Field Representative WWW.AirSCA.LE.0 OM Since 1981 Total Package Price w/out Option Total Equipment, Software,Installation, Configuration and Calibration........, **Key Notes: ** ® Delivery of all Equipment is available within 6-8 wks. During Installation A-1 Scale Service will always maintain at least (1) inbound and (1) outbound. scale operational at Cefe location. During upgrade of Elliot locations only(1) scale at a time will be available. ® Software updates and new hardware installation will occur simultaneously, with anticipate onsite interruptions of(3) days. Recommended Option Qty. (2)Model IND246 w/ Configuration and Scale Calibration..................... 3,440.00 Net Price . High. contrast LCD Display • Alpha Numeric data entry capability • Simple Inbound Outbound operation ® Subtotal and Total Weight Accumulators • Continuous Network Health Monitoring and reporting ® Scale Diagnostics 11 o flexible hrogranuriabdity • One electrically isolated coin port RS232 ® One TCP/IP 10-100 Base-T Ethernet • Optional 2 additional serial ports or USB *Replace current Indicators at Elliot Location with optional Indicator recommended. All configuration and calibration is included. Total Package price with Option Total Package Price Including Recommended Option............................... $ 85, 4111.00 Net Price Thank you for the opportunity. Chris Buchhorn Page 2 of 2 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained-and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1 ) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on GL, AL and WC if applicable. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-day advance written notice of Bodily Injury and Property Damage cancellation, non-renewal, material Per occurrence - aggregate change or termination required on all certificates and policies. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY $1 ,000,000 Per Occurrence including: $2,000,000 Aggregate 1 . Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY (including) $1 ,000,000 Combined Single Limit 1 . Owned 2. Hired and Non-Owned 3. Rented/Leased WORKERS'S COMPENSATION Statutory and complies with Part II of (All States Endorsement if Company is this Exhibit. not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a Page 1 of 3 policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, Page 2 of 3 and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2017 Insurance Requirements Purchasing Software and Equipment Upgrades for Solid Waste Transfer Station Scale Systems 08/15/2017 sw Risk Management Page 3 of 3 Attachment C: Bond Requirements Section 5. (B) is null for this Service Agreement. Page 1 of 1 Attachment D: Warranty Requirements For the new IND9U units and IND246 indicators, warranty covers parts for one year Page 1 of 1 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 latl Complete Nos.1-4 and 6 if there are interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos.1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING I Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate:Number: of business. 2017-253467 A-1 Scale Service San Antonio,TX United States Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is 0W2312017 being filed. City of Corpus Christi Date Acknowledged- 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to be provided under the contract. 52711 '- "1 11 Scale unattended unit upgrades for solid waste 4 Nature of interest Name of interested Party City,State,Country(place of business) (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Buchhorn,Chris San Antonio,TX United States x Bud'ihorn,Bubba San Antonio,TX United States x 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. El 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear,or affirm,under penalty of perjury,that the above disclosure is true and correct. D�RRYLLWMRD ARRYLLOCKARD MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ... ' ' My Cl www 01 8 March 26,2018 r Itire of authorized agent of contracting business erafty J AFFIX NOTARY STAMP I SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me,by the said r L5 C L,1 L,CW'I? this the -�N day of —CLI, t —41"J 1 201,to certify which,witness py hand and seal of office. iP PRA, e L $agnihjre of ff,c,,,, Onijmsterl4ig"o`aih Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Te as Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 se o� � AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 NORPOR PE 1852 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 19, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Miles Risley, City Attorney Miles (_cctexas.com 361 826-3361 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services — Purchasing Division Kim 2(_cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Workers' Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with York Risk Services Group, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey for workers' compensation third-party administrator services in accordance with Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 1133, based on best value for a total amount not to exceed $132,000, budgeted in FY2017-18. The term of this agreement is for one year with option to extend for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $660,000. PURPOSE: This service provides administrative services of all of the City's workers' compensation claims. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City of Corpus Christi is self-insured for injuries that City employees suffer on the job as part of our workers' compensation program. The third-party administrator (TPA) is contracted to provide statutorily required workers' compensation benefits to City employees. The TPA is also responsible for the management of all services required in the administration of workers' compensation claims. Services include but are not limited to claims administration, investigation, bill review, pharmacy, case management, rehabilitation services, coordination of peer and designated doctor reviews and pre- authorization (pre-certification). The TPA will store claims' data electronically, thus allowing Risk Management to generate analytical reports which illustrate specific trends. The reports are used to identify the types of injuries that are occurring, the amount paid on injuries, high risk areas, training needs, etc. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures along with the State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: N/A DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Risk Management FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $0 $660,000 $660,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $0 $660,000 $660,000 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 Fund(s): Liab/EB WC Comments: The initial contract is for an amount not to exceed $132,000, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $660,000. Funding will be requested during each budget year. RECOMMENDATION: Risk Management recommends approval to award a service contract to York Risk Services Group, Inc. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Evaluation Matrix s c. 0 H SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 1133 Workers Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services THIS Workers Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation ("City") and York Risk Services Group, Inc. ("Contractor'), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Workers Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 1133 ("RFB/RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Workers Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to four additional 12-month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $132,000.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in City of Corpus Christi Page 1 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Gilbert Sanchez Department: Legal Phone: 361-826-3739 Email: GilbertS2@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and City of Corpus Christi Page 2 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. City of Corpus Christi Page 3 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Gilbert Sanchez Title: Safety and Risk Manager Address: 1201 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Fax: 361-826-3697 IF TO CONTRACTOR: York Risk Services Group, Inc. Attn: Jody A. Moses Title: Senior Vice President Address: 333 City Blvd. West. Suite 1500, Orange, CA 92868 Fax: 512-346-9321 City of Corpus Christi Page 4 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 With a copy to: Attn: Michael Krawitz Title: Senior Vice President and General Counsel Address: 1 Upper Pond Road, Bldg F 4th Floor, Parisappany, NJ 07054 17. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach City of Corpus Christi Page 5 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1 ) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. City of Corpus Christi Page 6 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Page 7 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 i CONTRACTOR Signature: ° Printed Name: Title: Date: �. . � CITY F' CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Larne: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1 : RFB/RFP No. 1 133 Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response City of Corpus Christi Page 8 of 8 Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Farm 7/1/16 Attachment A: Scope of Work 1.1. General Requirements/ Background A. The City of Corpus Christi is seeking qualified Third Party Administrators to provide services to the Risk Management Division for Workers' Compensation Program. B. The Contractor is to provide a broad representation of medical providers included in any PPO network(s) made available to it by the Contractor, including, but not limited to treating physicians, clinics, specialists, physical therapists, rehabilitation services, and pharmacies. The Contractor is to provide a plan allowing a reduction in fees in the event of failure to satisfy an agreed-upon performance standard, consisting of standard industry performance criteria and any special service criteria otherwise agreed upon. C. Contractor must provide the services listed below. 1 . Early intervention programs (medical case management) 2. Utilization review/pre-authorization services 3. Medical bill audits 4. Availability and use of PPO networks or other medical fee discount arrangements 5. Rehabilitation services 6. Vocational case management services 7. Assistance with development of medical provider networks 8. On-line computer services 9. Attending DWC hearings (the adjuster is expected to attend all hearings) 10. Impairment ratings/review 11 . Run-off (per-claim basis) 12. Run-in (per-claim basis) 13. Re-opened prior (per-claim basis) 14. Peer review 15. Attendance at mediation hearings 16. Surveillance D. The Loss information provided is obtained from the current Claims Administrator and is accurate to the best of the City's knowledge. See Exhibit A. The number of claims the City of Corpus Christi has processed from 2012-2017 totals at 3,006. 1.2. Scope of Work A. Program Administration Requirements 1 . The Contractor will appoint a senior account representative, line adjusters and supervisory adjusters to serve solely in a management and administrative capacity. This representative should have at least five years of experience in RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 1 of 9 workers' compensation, and must have experience in insurance matters for municipal entities. This person is to be available one month prior to the start of the contract to ensure a smooth transition with the current Contractor. The person is expected to be responsive to the City's administrative needs. 2. The Contractor must assign a minimum of one qualified senior workers' compensation adjuster to this account to handle indemnity claim. This adjuster should have at least five years of experience in workers' compensation, and must have experience in insurance matters for municipalities. In addition, one qualified, dedicated adjuster to handle medical only claims is to be provided. 3. In the event an assigned adjuster be unable to perform the assigned duties satisfactorily as determined by the City, immediate replacement of such adjuster is required. The City's Risk Manager will be consulted in decisions regarding adjusters who will be handling City claims. 4. The Contractor's hours of operation will be Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 5. The Contractor will collect and report data as required by Federal, State and Local authorities, for the purpose of income filings for those claim payments made by the Contractor. 6. The Contractor shall provide a full range of workers' compensation claims administration services shall be provided in accordance with all requirements of the Texas Labor Code, Texas Insurance Code, Texas Department of Insurance Administrative Rules, and the Texas Workers' Compensation Act. 7. All administrative fines incurred as a result of the Contractor's or the Contractor's subcontractor failure to comply with the Texas Workers' Compensation Act and related rules shall be paid by the Contractor and not the City. 8. The Contractor shall follow all rules applicable to HIPPA (any other similar law). 9. The Contractor shall follow all rules with respect to reporting claims for the purposes of Medicare and such associated reporting is to be done by the Contractor. 10. The Contractor will provide an on-line, web based computer claims services and tracking system to the City that includes, but is not limited to diary narrative, supervisor and adjuster notes, and electronic access to claims files. The claim system must have a standard statistical reporting package. RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 2 of 9 1 1 . The claims system must be capable of generating IRS Form 1099 to vendors and service providers as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The Contractorwill forward the Forms 1099 as required by applicable law to the IRS electronically or magnetically based on IRS guidelines. 12. The claims system must be able to provide special reports, and the City must be provided access to all claims data in order to generate its own reports. The claim breakdown is to include, but not be limited to department; accident type; claimant age, gender and occupation; claim severity; line of coverage; claimant experience level; time of day, week and year of accident; and type of equipment involved. 13. The claims system must allow the City to enter the first report of injury electronically. 14. All claims are to be electronic/paperless. 15. The Contractor shall scan and attach all claim documents to the electronic claim. Physical storage for historical workers' compensation claim files must be provided. 16. The Contractor must have a comprehensive business continuity/disaster plan for data recovery. 17. The Contractor will utilize the same injury codes, classification codes and departmental codes as the City's current system. 18. The Contractor will meet with the City on a quarterly basis to review open claims. 19. All claims reported under the contract, including records only, medical only, indemnity claims, and subrogation will be administered until fully settled, regardless of the period of time involved or required, in accordance with the fee structures indicated in the contract for services. 20. The Contractor will be responsible for handling subrogation claims until settled by all parties. Approval of the City's Risk Manager is required before discounting any subrogation lien. 21 . Settlement of any claim requires the approval of the City's Risk Manager. RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 3 of 9 22. The Contractor will notify the City's Risk Manager via email within forty-eight (48) hours that a Benefit Review Conference or Contested Case Hearing has been scheduled. 23. Contesting the decision of any hearing officer requires the approval of the City's Risk Manager. 24. Upon expiration or termination of the contract resulting from this RFP, within thirty days of the City's request, at no additional cost to the City, the current Contractor shall provide the new Contractor with all data requested by the City. B. Fund Requirements 1 . The City will make funds available that the Contractor may draw from for claims and/or loss payments. The City will hold all funds for outstanding claims and reserves. A loss fund will be maintained in an amount agreeable to the Contractor and to the City. 2. All payments made shall be made by issuance of checks from the designated City-administer checking account established at the City's depository bank. The Contractor shall electronically transmit a check register to the City's Financial Services Department on a monthly basis. Such check register shall be transmitted by the Contractor no later than the second business day of the month following the month to which the check register refers. 3. The Contractor shall transmit, via email, the check number, check amount and date of the check to the City's depository before a check is mailed. In lieu of issuing stop payment requests, the Contractor shall void the check with the City's depository so that the request to deny payment remains in effect indefinitely. For each voided check the Contractor shall transmit to the City's depository via electronic file transfer the check number, check amount and the date of the check. 4. The City shall be responsible for balancing and reconciling this account monthly, including processing of all unclaimed checks. 5. The City will advise the Contractor, at least quarterly, on the status of outstanding checks so that the Contractor may determine whether payment(s) to any payee should be voided and reissued, or be processed as unclaimed property. 6. Duplicate payments of any type which are unrecovered by the Contractor shall be reimbursed to the City by the Contractor. RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 4 of 9 7. The Contractor will furnish the City with monthly summaries of the bank account and expenditures, including a list of all checks, vouchers and voided checks, in numerical sequence. The summaries must include the following: • Claimant Name and Claim Number • Date of Issue • Amount • Payee • Type of Benefit Paid • Benefit Period 8. The Contractor will review open reserves with the City's Risk Manager monthly. 9. The Contractor will be subject to the approval of the excess workers' compensation insurance company, if requested by the excess insurer, as may be applicable. C. Claims Administration 1 . The Contractor will provide claims reporting services on a 24 hour basis. 2. The Contractor agrees to use claim forms provided by the City, or otherwise to furnish the forms to the City as may be necessary. 3. The Contractor will investigate, reserve, adjust, settle or decline all reported claims in accordance with state workers' compensation statutes and generally accepted loss adjustment standards. 4. The Contractor shall assign a reported claim to an adjuster within 24 hours of the Contractor's receipt of notice of injury. 5. The assigned adjuster will contact, or attempt to contact, all claimants within 24 hours of receiving notice of claim assignment. 6. The Contractor will contact the injured employee's department and medical provider within two business days of notification of an injury. 7. The Contractor will obtain recorded statements from claimants within two (2) business days of notification of injury. In addition, the Contractor will obtain recorded statements from any witness when there is any lost time involved in the claim. 8. The Contractor will obtain approval from the City prior to denying any claim or prior to final disposition of any claim settlement that is outside the settlement authority granted to the Contractor by the City. Any request for settlement RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 5 of 9 authority or declinations will be submitted in writing to the City with the following information: • A description of the facts and nature of the incident • A description of the damages and/or injuries • An evaluation of the incident • The claimant's demand • The amount for which authority is requested 9. The City will reserve the right to direct the handling of any claim or to take over the handling of any claim at any time during the life of the service agreement and/or the life of the claim. 10.The Contractor will monitor medical treatment of injured employees and obtain appropriate medical reports. 11 .The Contractor will keep all open claims on a current diary system, which provides for periodic review by the assigned adjuster. Each file shall be reviewed and updates as necessary, but not less than once every 30 days. 12.The Contractor will audit medical, hospital and miscellaneous invoices prior to approving for payment. 13.The City will retain the right to select its own medical service providers, as well as others utilized for special claims handling procedures, inclusive of internal medical resources; i.e., nurse practitioners. 14.The Contractor will authorize medical treatment and indemnity benefits considered related, customary and necessary, issue checks or authorize payments for treatment and benefits. The payment of indemnity and medical benefits must be in accordance with the express authorization issued by the City to the Contractor. 15.The Contractorwill conduct an on-site investigation of any claim at the request of the City within 24 hours of receiving the first notice of loss. At the discretion of the City, claims with severe loss potential will be investigated on the same day the claim is reported. 16.The Contractor will prepare and provide the City with narrative reports for serious or contested injuries, when appropriate and as requested by the City. 17.The Contractorwill be alert to the potential for subrogation and make every effort to secure and pursue the City's rights of recovery. RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 6 of 9 18.The Contractor will negotiate settlement with injured employees, their attorneys or representatives within the discretionary settlement authority. 19.The Contractor will consult with the City and defense attorneys in the settlement of litigated claims, and provide and monitor files for the defense and outcome of these litigated claims. 20.The Contractor may assist in the recommendation and selection of defense attorney(s); however, the City will retain the right to select the attorney(s) it chooses. 21 .The Contractor will be available to assist in the development and/or implementation of written procedures and instructions to assure quality and ongoing operation of the City's claims management program. 1.3. Quality Control A. Contractors must have policies and procedures in place to ensure and measure internal quality control. The policies and procedures should address all aspects of the claims handling process, including, but not limited to: 1 . Claims adjuster/supervisor caseloads for employers' liability and workers' compensation 2. Claims file documentation requirements 3. Provide a web-based claims handling program 4. Investigation and communication 5. Initial contact with injured employee 6. Recorded statements 7. Reserving guidelines 8. Frequency of reviews of open claim reserves 9. Diary system maintained for all claim activities 10. Frequency of supervisor's review of each adjuster's claim files 11 . Frequency of follow-up contacts with workers' compensation lost-time claimants 12. Pursuing subrogation 13. Litigation/attorney management 14. Expense controls on other vendors 15. Special investigation or surveillance procedures 16. Compliance with excess insurance reporting requirements 17. General client servicing requirements and guidelines 18. Index bureau query and reporting guidelines B. The Contractor will furnish administration manuals, including instructions and all necessary forms within 30 days following the effective date of the awarded contract RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 7 of 9 1.4. Quality Assurance A. The Contractor will be subject to periodic claims audits by an independent firm at the discretion of the City. The purpose of such an audit is to measure compliance with the agreed-upon claims administration servicing standards desired by the City. B. The City has the option to audit any or all files maintained by the Contractor and requires adequate internal controls. The Contractor is required to provide adequate internal control procedures to protect the City from any type of financial loss. RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claim Type by Year No. of Claims Total Paid Outstanding Total Incurred 2012 668 $1,387,802.40 $51,128.44 $1,438,930.84 1 $19,210.00 $0.00 $19,210.00 Indemnity 44 $971,192.45 $51,128.44 $1,022,320.89 Medical Only 612 $336,736.86 $0.00 $336,736.86 Medical Only-Complex 11 $60,663.09 $0.00 $60,663.09 2013 603 $1,721,992.72 $16,352.04 $1,738,344.76 Indemnity 56 $1,463,035.43 $16,352.04 $1,479,387.47 Medical Only 533 $196,463.55 $0.00 $196,463.55 Medical Only-Complex 10 $61,649.80 $0.00 $61,649.80 Medical Only- Minor 3 $843.94 $0.00 $843.94 Reporting Purposes Only 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2014 549 $1,512,514.99 $65,445.04 $1,577,960.03 Indemnity 57 $1,284,778.81 $65,445.04 $1,350,223.85 Medical Only 478 $175,751.82 $0.00 $175,751.82 Medical Only-Complex 13 $51,332.70 $0.00 $51,332.70 Medical Only- Minor 1 $651.66 $0.00 $651.66 2015 523 $1,791,860.28 $341,494.52 $2,133,354.80 Indemnity 59 $1,545,829.63 $331,509.12 $1,877,338.75 Medical Only 362 $145,767.58 $0.00 $145,767.58 Medical Only-Complex 29 $100,263.07 $9,985.40 $110,248.47 Reporting Purposes Only 73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2016 545 $743,247.87 $478,650.98 $1,221,898.85 Indemnity 41 $443,847.40 $437,109.88 $880,957.28 Medical Only 318 $233,684.45 $25,156.65 $258,841.10 Medical Only-Complex 23 $65,716.02 $16,384.45 $82,100.47 Reporting Purposes Only 163 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017 118 $37,647.27 $257,110.32 $294,757.59 Indemnity 4 $8,543.23 $144,810.86 $153,354.09 Medical Only 78 $26,041.41 $97,503.34 $123,544.75 Medical Only-Complex 1 $3,062.63 $14,796.12 $17,858.75 Reporting Purposes Only 35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Grand Total 3006 $7,195,065.53 $1,210,181.34 $8,405,246.87 RFP Template 04.06.17 Page 9 of 9 Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Pricing Form PURCHASING DIVISION RFP No. 1133 Workers Compensation Third-Party Administration Services DATE: July 20, 2017 York Risk Services Group ,Jody A. Moses, Senior Vice President PROPOSER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE I. Refer to"Instructions to Proposers"and Contract Teras and Conditions before completing proposal. 2. Provide your best price for each item. 3. In submitting this proposal, (Proposer certifies that: a. the prices in this proposal have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Proposer or competitor, for the Purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Proposer is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and the Disclosure of Interest information on file with City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true. c. Proposer has incorporated any changes issue through Addenda to the RFP in this pricing. Item Description Unit Pee Workers'Compensation 1 Indemnity Per claim $960 2 Medical - Only Per claim $175 3 Re ort - Only Per claim 35 8197 Cost 4 Indemnity Per claim 0 5 Medical - Only Per claim $0 6 Other Per claim $0 Rurvh Cost 4 7 Indemnit y Per claim 8 Medical - Only Per claim $0 9 Other Per claim $0 fF Medical Case Management Per claim 90.00/FCM 85.00/TCM 11 Utilization Review Services Per review $95 Nurse, $165 Physician, Retrospective $165 12 Medical Bill Audits per bill $8.00 per bill !1!4j Use of 504 Physician Panel Network Per claim $11.50 per bili* Rehabilitation Services Per claim 90 per hour Item 13— Based on 504 Board approval Page 1 of 3 Item Description Unit Fee 15 Vocational Case Management Services Per claim $90 per hour Return to Work/Medical Provider 16 Programs Per claim $90 per hour 17 Online Computer Services Per user $Included 18 Attending DWC Hearin gs(BRC and CCH) Per hearing $Included 19 Attending Mediation Hearings Per hearing $Included 20 Impairment Rating Review Per review $250 Physician Review 21 Pursuing Subrogation Per claim $Included 22 Re-open prior claims Per claim $200 for FPC reopen 23 Peer Review Per review $ 250 - $650 per review 24 Attorney Fees Per hour $ Included 25 Precertification Per Precertification $ Included 26 Administrative Fee Per month $1200.00 Please refer to the following page for York's pricing notes and years 2 through 5 pricing for claims and managed care services. We have also provided flat annual fee option for the City's consideration. Page 2 of 3 MRH-181 $00 9dA9"Mn1fF9(qe" of 6480,ilas R- +1469 fee We viaap_ X14W. fee nr•reacalrlW�t lgali be blidgeied regapdlerie 96 Ikei Ampratmetz in #-Inim «nh Ime Fee per claim structure is challenging to support the City's request for a "dedicated" claim examiner. The examiner will manage nothing but the City's claims regardless of any change in claim volume. Should the volume decrease, York could be in the position with too few claims to support the cost of the fully dedicated claim examiner. Therefore, the fee per claim pricing stated on the pricing page above requires a fee for takeover claims at each anniversary during the contract term. York will remain open should the City wish at some point to a "designated" examiner that we may reprice accordingly. York's service is reliant on our employees, therefore we strive to provide competitive salaries, benefits, and training to recruit and retain staff. As such, all proposed fee per claim pricing above shall have 3% annual increases to keep up with increase labor costs. Managed Care Fees Years 2 through 5 Bill Review Pricin NEE= go= $8.24 8.49 $8.74 _ $9.00 fl Preauthorization Pricinil: l:1!1 I rrr I Now, J, Nurse$95.00 Nurse $98.00 Nurse $98.00 Nurse $99.00 Ph ician 170.00 Physician 175.00 Physician $175.00 PhVsi2jgfl_jj§g1QO Retros ective Utilization vi Ren ERA== $1 00 1�5.00 $170.00 !7!5! $175.00 Case Mana ement §MW .............................................. Offik I FCM $91.00 FCM'$92.00 FCM $93.00 FCM $94.00 TCM $86.00 TCM $87.00 L TCM $88.00 TCM $89.00 Page 3 of 3 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements A. PROPOSER'S LIABILITY INSURANCE 1 . Proposer must not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Proposer must not allow any subcontractor Agency to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor Agency has been obtained. 2. Proposer must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director Human Resources, 2 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-written day notice of cancellation, Bodily Injury and Property Damage required on all certificates or by Per occurrence - aggregate applicable policy endorsements Commercial General Liability $1 ,000,000 Per Occurrence including: 1 . Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY (including) $1 ,000,000 Combined Single Limit 1 . Owned 2. Hired and Non-Owned 3. Rented/Leased PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY $1,000,000 Per Claim (Errors and Omissions) (Defense costs not included in face value of the policy) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. CRIME/EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY $1,000,000 Per Occurrence Contractor shall name the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as Loss Payee Page 1 of 3 WORKERS' COMPENSATION Statutory EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY $500,000 /$500,000 /$500,000 3. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Proposer must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. B. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1 . Applicable for paid employees, Proposer must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Proposer will be promptly met. 2. Proposer shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Proposer's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. 3. Proposer shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Proposer shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 4. Proposer agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non-renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. Page 2 of 3 5. Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non-renewal of coverage, Proposer shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Proposer's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 6. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Proposer's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Proposer to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Proposer hereunder until Proposer demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 7. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Proposer may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Proposer's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8. It is agreed that Proposer's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 9. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. 2017 Insurance Requirements Legal Dept. - Risk Management Worker's Compensation TPA Services 05/02/2017 sw Risk Management Page 3 of 3 Attachment C: Bond Requirements Section 5. (B) is null for this Service Agreement. Page 1 of 1 Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Section 8. Warranty is null for this Service Agreement. Page 1 of 1 RFP No.1133 Workers' Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services - Summary Evaluation Matrix Alternative CAS-Claims Coir **Cannon Cochiran �"ell Enterprise 7inlstair Ci6sVc YorkCi6sVc Services �Proposdll E.:v IWJlldl'lllon Services Aduraiinishatives CoManagement Comp,V a.. Management tiroupy,V a.. Concepts,LLC Services,Mo. Vuta.. Minimum Qualifications Required three years in business Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail No outsanding lawsuits during last 5 years Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail No outsanding regulatory issues last 5 years Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail No current litigation ith the City during the last 5 years Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail References Provided for firm Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Technical Proposal Technical Proposal(50 points) 35 36.33 38.33 42 46.33 0 Interview Interview(30 points) 26.33 22.33 25.67 25 28.67 0 Price Price(20 points) 18.37 20 17.29 11.9 15.89 0 Total 79.7 i 78.66 i 81.29 i 78.9 90.89 0 **Deemed non-responsive due to Firm not utilizing the correct pricing form. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 10fl Complete Nos.1-4 and 6 if there are interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos. 1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING I Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 2017-238465 York Risk Services Group, Inc Parsippany, NJ United States Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is 07/19/2017 being filed. City of Corpus Christi Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to be provided under the contract. 1133 Workers'Compensation Third-Party Administrator Services 4 Nature of interest Name of Interested Party City,State,Country(place of business) (check applicable) Controlling I intermediary Moses, Jody Orange, CA United States X Creasey, E. Harry Parsippany, NJ United States X Taketa, Richard Parsippany, NJ United States X Mukherjee, Saswata Parsippany, NJ United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. G AFFIDAVIT I swear,or affirm,under penalty of perjury,that the above disclosure is true and correct. 004M M.THE iMW R=Of NEW MW ID 0 2450281 192 Signature of authorized a of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP/SEAL ABOVE cka d ki­a to Sworn to and subscribed before me,by the said this the i q4A day of 20 to certify which,witness my hand and seal of office. C, 0 Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath I I Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.883........................ ....... SC O U AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 185 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 1, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: William J. Green, P.E., Interim Director, Development Services Department BiIIG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property located at 1840 Saratoga Boulevard CAPTION: Case No. 0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property is described as being Bohemian Colony Lands 6.379 acres out of Section 7, Lot 5, located north of Saratoga Boulevard and east of Greenwood Drive. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property for sale of the property. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Vote Results: For: 6 Against: 0 Absent: 3 Abstained: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District for sale of the property. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the Future Land Use Map, as well as PlanCC and the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning is also compatible with neighboring properties and with the general character of the surrounding area. This rezoning does not have a negative impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned for light industrial uses. The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map, PlanCC, and the Westside Area Development Plan. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non-Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital 0 Not applicable Project to Date Fiscal Year: 2016- Expenditures Current 2017 (CIP only) Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley Cox ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Bohemian Colony Lands 6.379 acres out of Sec. 7, Lot 5, from the "RS-6" Single- Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, July 26, 2017, during a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single- Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District, and on Tuesday, September 19, 20177 during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on a property described as Bohemian Colony Lands 6.379 acres out of Section 7, Lot 5, located north of Saratoga Boulevard and east of Greenwood Drive (the "Property"), from "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District (Zoning Map No. 050037), as shown in Exhibit "A". Exhibit A, which is a map of the property, is attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in its entirety. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\Legistar\2017 CC Agenda Items\9-19-2017\Zoning\0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley\Ordinance_0717-02_Bradley W.Shirley and Valerie V.Shirley.docx Page 2 of 3 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\Legistar\2017 CC Agenda Items\9-19-2017\Zoning\0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley and Valerie V. Shirley\Ordinance_0717-02_Bradley W.Shirley and Valerie V.Shirley.docx Page 3 of 3 IL IL SUBJECT PROPER "Ro IL IL P14_ IL IL IL .0 FIR DR WEB1.4 a 17 r oilo w�Pr ml� ��E yaw n CASE.- 0717-02' S EJB,.JOE C T PROPERTY WITH ZONING r ID Froper(y PERTY I II III am Ill Illy 9 IIIL ulgpt ImldluistrIII' �.�� ��� •.. 1R .� Ih9�uIIRBlllhdmmllllltM,�� mew llmdusIdea ....��+ �� IRi .:, Ina�u llGtlillrt�e 111 ll��� IPILVID IrP'ii mW lmdh lm�d IDovr.�Overlay plry IR*rroaass lll0Imam�Da'MIIRIVoe IIIA Ip Iift2,lllm-IFamm llllly'lid {+ `.( I-AT IM Iw lllftillrt=111 Ulla AT IRI"SA iftigIIIe-IF,avmllllly 8 �'f � mmgmP o�" �� r�•�.. .I I"IIIgId ldorllhood Comma l -IFan Illy�.�IS�4 S iIXl� C-N2 IMalllpllh ldorlRaood Comma nolllal111 }� +� IRS-TIF ���-IF,alrn llllp l ! SR'I IRUaswaH Soi mlmmen�IIWrIV IRI .1T, Mig1ll¢IF,asm lllllp SF4 P IRUasoM SoIPmwmarrDIII III � f' IRS IRUa 9 rihillm da E,9h 61h a { R5�nr ram f olPmlPm�a nmlll,am -TMT RRlhll^dl s 032 i5entrafiroinmorWad &P Speoldl(R I 01 InIalmsave CoMina,rolllaIII IFIV Iid�R���tll�m �fnf ll�I IN, CSID I Collmlmerm'llVa 111 IRS IHM IllwaiwIf'aw1wrad I SR-�s IRUa�n solirvmlmmermlllai 111 �' ------ -IR ,,.r,p FIR IFa nmm uraVR --.�: -�•• � - c II IHislorlllo Dwrlllal -� IV- BuslllmasslRFark LOCATION MAP `~w I Zoning Case #0717-02 Bradley W. Shirley & Valerie V. Shirley From: "RS -6" Single -Family District To: "IL" Light Industrial District City Council Presentation September 19, 2017 Aerial Overview Subject Property at 1840 Saratoga Boulevard Zoning Pattern UDC Requirements Buffer Yards: "IL" to "RS -6" Type D: 20'/20 pts. Setbacks: Street: 20 feet Side: 0 feet Rear: 40 feet (Residential) Height: 2:1 Restriction Uses Allowed: Warehouse, Freight, Retail, Offices Staff and Planning Commission Recommendation Approval of the "IL" Light Industrial District PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0717-02 INFOR No. 17ZN1024 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 26, 2017 r- Owner: Bradley W. Shirley & Valerie V. Shirley Applicant/Representative: Bradley W. Shirley •Q J '0 Location Address: 1840 Saratoga Boulevard a o6 w Legal Description: Bohemian Colony Lands 6.379 acres out of Section 7, Lot 0 5, Located north of Saratoga Blvd., and east of Greenwood Dr. y From: "RS-6" Single-Family Residential .� To: "IL" Light Industrial io ari Area: 6.379 acres Purpose of Request: Rezoning for sale of the property. Existing Zoning District Existing Land Future Land Use Vacant and Site "RS-6" Single-Family 6 Low Density Light Industrial y Residential C •� North "RS-6" Single-Family 6 Agricultural Medium Density N° Residential J South "IL" Light Industrial Vacant Light Industrial yLight Industrial w East "IL" Light Industrial and Vacant Light Industrial West "IL" Light Industrial Light Industrial Light Industrial and Vacant 08 Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries c c of the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned for light industrial uses. The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is consistent with the a c adopted Future Land Use Map which calls for Light Industrial uses. a Map No.: 050037 Zoning Violations: None 0 Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 220 0 feet of street frontage along Saratoga Boulevard which is designated as an CL "AY Primary Arterial Divided Street. c� L Staff Report Page 2 Urban Proposed Existing Traffic Street Transportation Plan ai � Type Section Section Volume L O C Saratoga130' ROW 120' ROW 2,904 ADT Boulevard "A3" Primary Arterial 79' paved 75' paved (2013) Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family District to the "IL" Light Industrial District for sale of the property. Development Plan: The subject property is comprised of 6.379 acres. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned "RS-6" Single- Family and is agricultural land. To the west is vacant land (Saratoga Place Subdivision) zoned "IL" Light Industrial District. Saratoga Place was zoned to the "IL" Light Industrial District in 1997. To the north, property was rezoned to the "RS-6" Single-Family District. To the south across Saratoga Blvd. a rezoning occurred to the "IL" Light Industrial District in 1984 to construct a warehouse, though the property is now vacant. To the east a rezoning occurred in 1996 to the "IL" Light Industrial District. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The property is not platted. PlanCC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. The proposed rezoning is also consistent with the following policies of the Westside ADP and PlanCC: • Encourage the protection and enhancement of residential neighborhoods (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Support the separation of high-volume traffic from residential areas or other noise-sensitive land uses. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 3). • Industrial properties should be required to minimize undesirable "spillover effects" into residential and commercial areas (this includes noise, air pollution, negligent visual blight, etc.) by means of property layout-out and organization of activities by screening and maintaining buffer areas or zones for their activities (Policy Statement C.6). Staff Report Page 3 Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is compatible with the Future Land Use Map, as well as PlanCC and the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning is also compatible with neighboring properties and with the general character of the surrounding area. This rezoning does not have a negative impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. • The property is currently vacant. • If the "I L" Light Industrial District is approved, any development will still need to abide all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC). Specific requirements would entail buffer yards and setbacks. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 20171 Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Vote Results: For: 6 Opposed: 0 Absent: 3 Abstained: 0 Number of Notices Mailed — 11 within 200-foot notification area 2 outside notification area 0 As of July 21, 2017: In Favor — 0 inside notification area o — 0 outside notification area Z In Opposition — 0 inside notification area a3 — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0717-02 Bradley W.Shirley and Valerie V.Shirley\PC Documents\Staff Report_0717- 02_Bradley W.Shirley and Valerie V.Shirley.docx IL IL SUBJECT PROPER "Ro IL IL P14_ IL IL IL .0 FIR DR WEB1.4 a 17 r oilo w�Pr ml� ��E yaw n CASE.- 0717-02' S EJB,.JOE C T PROPERTY WITH ZONING r ID Froper(y PERTY I II III am Ill Illy 9 IIIL ulgpt ImldluistrIII' �.�� ��� •.. 1R .� Ih9�uIIRBlllhdmmllllltM,�� mew llmdusIdea ....��+ �� IRi .:, Ina�u llGtlillrt�e 111 ll��� IPILVID IrP'ii mW lmdh lm�d IDovr.�Overlay plry IR*rroaass lll0Imam�Da'MIIRIVoe IIIA Ip Iift2,lllm-IFamm llllly'lid {+ `.( I-AT IM Iw lllftillrt=111 Ulla AT IRI"SA iftigIIIe-IF,avmllllly 8 �'f � mmgmP o�" �� r�•�.. .I I"IIIgId ldorllhood Comma l -IFan Illy�.�IS�4 S iIXl� C-N2 IMalllpllh ldorlRaood Comma nolllal111 }� +� IRS-TIF ���-IF,alrn llllp l ! SR'I IRUaswaH Soi mlmmen�IIWrIV IRI .1T, Mig1ll¢IF,asm lllllp SF4 P IRUasoM SoIPmwmarrDIII III � f' IRS IRUa 9 rihillm da E,9h 61h a { R5�nr ram f olPmlPm�a nmlll,am -TMT RRlhll^dl s 032 i5entrafiroinmorWad &P Speoldl(R I 01 InIalmsave CoMina,rolllaIII IFIV Iid�R���tll�m �fnf ll�I IN, CSID I Collmlmerm'llVa 111 IRS IHM IllwaiwIf'aw1wrad I SR-�s IRUa�n solirvmlmmermlllai 111 �' ------ -IR ,,.r,p FIR IFa nmm uraVR --.�: -�•• � - c II IHislorlllo Dwrlllal -� IV- BuslllmasslRFark LOCATION MAP `~w I SC O U AGENDA MEMORANDUM 1852 Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 1, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: William J. Green, P.E., Interim Director, Development Services Department BiIIG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 6802 Weber CAPTION: Case No. 0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP: A change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to "CG-2" General Commercial District. The property is described as being 0.839 acres out of the west 170 feet of Foxwood Estates Phase III, Block 11, Lot 2, located along the east side of Weber Road, north of Bratton Road, and south of Saratoga Boulevard. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow for the construction of an Express Tunnel Carwash. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to "CG-2" General Commercial District. Vote Results: For: 9 Against: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District to allow for the construction of an Express Tunnel Carwash on the 64,500 square feet. abutting Weber Road. The remainder will remain "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to act as a zoning transition buffer. A small retail center is planned for the Neighborhood Commercial portion. The proposed rezoning to the "CG-2" General Commercial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map, PlanCC, and the Southside Area Development Plan. The proposed rezoning is compatible with uses for the ACUZ zone APZ-2. The provided site plan and noise diagrams are designed to minimize noise to the residential properties to the east. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries the Southside Area Development Plan and is planned for commercial uses. The proposed rezoning to the "CG-2" General Commercial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map, PlanCC, and the Southside Area Development Plan. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non-Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital 0 Not applicable Project to Date Fiscal Year: 2016- Expenditures 2017 (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by CC Ventures Equities IV, LP ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to the west 170 feet of Foxwood Estates Phase III, Block 11, Lot 2, from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of CC Ventures Equities IV, LP. ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, July 26, 2017, during a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District, and on Tuesday, September 19, 2017, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by CC Ventures Equities IV, LP ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City") is amended by changing the zoning on a property described as being the west 170 feet of Foxwood Estates Phase III, Block 11, Lot 2, located along the east side of Weber Road, north of Bratton Road, and south of Saratoga Boulevard (the "Property"), from "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District (Zoning Map No. 047034), as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B". Exhibit A, which is a metes and bounds description of the Property, and Exhibit B, which is a map to accompany the metes and bounds, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP\Council Documents\Ordinance_0617- 03_CC Ventures Equities IV, I-Rdocx Page 2 of 3 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP\Council Documents\Ordinance_0617- 03_CC Ventures Equities IV, LP.docx Page 3 of 3 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Field notes of a 0.839 acre tract being the west 170.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 11, Foxwood Estates Phase I1I, as shown on a map recorded in Volume 65, Page 158, Map Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 0.839 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the southeast right of way of Weber Road, for the common west corner of Lots 1 and 2, Block 11, and for the west corner of this survey. THENCE with the common line of Lot 2 and Weber Road, North 28°43'02" East, a distance of 215.00 feet to a point for the common west corner of Lot 2, Block 11, and Block 1, Country Club Estates Unit 31, as shown on a map recorded in Volume 57, Page 148, Map Records Nueces County, Texas, and for the north corner of this survey. THENCE with the common line of Lot 2, Block 11, and of said Block 1, Country Club Estates Unit 31, South 61'49'5 1" East, a distance of 170.00 feet to a point for the east corner of this survey. THENCE South 28°43'04" West, a distance of 214.83 feet to a point in the common line of Lots 1 and 2, and for the south corner of this survey. THENCE with the common line of Lots 1 and 2, North 61053'17" West, a distance of 170.00 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING of this tract, and containing 0.839 acres of land, more or less. Notes: 1.) Bearings are based on the Foxwood Estates Phase III plat as shown on a map recorded in Volume 65, Page 158, Map Records Nueces County, Texas.. 2.) A Map of equal date accompanies this Metes and Bounds description. 3.) Set 5/8" iron rod= iron rod set with yellow plastic cap labeled Brister Surveying. 4.) This metes and bounds description does not represent an on the ground survey. I, Ronald E. Brister do hereby certify that this survey of the property legally described herein is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1--�da2 e.6u&-L Ronald E. Brister, RPLS No. 5407 Date: May 19, 2017. P-�EOFr *�•P�G1�R�°'9 .....:.........:............:.... RONALD E•BMSTER 5407 �FfSS P�Q- q SURV�O Job No. 170791 EXHIBIT A SURVEY OF A 0.839 ACRE TRACT BEING THE WEST 170.00 FEET OF LOT 2,BLOCK 11,FOXWOOD ESTATES PHASE III,AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 65,PAGE 158,MAP RECORDS NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS. COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES UNIT 31 BLOCK 1,LOTS 48-50 VOL.57,PG.148 M.R.N.C.T. SCALE 1"=40' S61°49'51"E 170.00' 7.5'U.E. ------------------ II II II II II II M II � II 0 WEST 170.00' v N II w w LOT 2 N 4 c a I I 0.839 ACRES 3 REMAINDER 0 x I I 36,534 S.F. a OF LOT 2 4 W � z 00 I I cn W II II II II II II II II P.O.B. N61°53'17"W 170.00' LOT Q=PROPERTY CORNER NOTES: Brister Surveying 1)TOTAL SURVEYED AREA IS 0.839 ACRES, 2,)BEARINGS ARE BASED ONTHE FOXWOOD ESTATES 4455 Su"1h Padre Island Drive S1111e 51 PHASE Ill PLAT AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN CorpusChri 6,Texas 78411 VOLUME 65,PAGE 158,M.R.N.C.T. Off 361-850-I8U0 3.)SET 518"IRON ROD=IRON ROD SET WITH YELLOW Fax 361-850-1802 PLASTIC CAP LABEL ED BRISTER SURVEYING, Brislersumeyi ngC?corpus.lwcbccomO F,, 4.)THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT ANON THE Firm Rzgistrarion No.IU072SUU '( F GROUND SURVEY. �P•'•GISTE'.�'9 5.+PO RFp 'PHIS SURVEY DOES NOT INCLUDE THE RESEARCH, 13Y GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY,THIS PROPERTY to* * INVESTIGATION,OR LOCATIONS OF ALL SERVITUDES, IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE C AS DEFINED RONALD E BRISTER EASEMENTS,RIGHT OF WAYS,OR UTILITIES ON THIS ................................. PROPERTY. BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 5407 r MAPS.COMMUNITY PANEL 485494 0508 D POFESSb�P' I,RONALD E.BRISTER UO IIEREBY CERTIFY THA7"PHIS Q' SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED DA1'EU JUNE 4,19$7 q�30RV�� HEREIN IS THE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND I$ AND BELIEF. ❑ ®IS NOT LOCATED IN A DESIGNATED YEAR FLOOD ZONE. _/J/ / I /,�� SURVEYDATE MAY 19,2017 ,TOB NO.170791 RONALD E.BRISTER R.RLS.NO.5407 EXHIBIT B Zoning Case #0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV, LP From: "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District To: "CG -2" General Commercial District City Council Presentation September 19, 2017 Aerial Overview Subject Property at 6802 Weber Road Zoning Pattern UDC Requirements Buffer Yards: "CG -2" to "CN -1" None "CN -1" to "RS -6" Type B: 10'/10 pts. Noise: 7' Wall Setbacks: Street: 20 feet Side: 0 feet Rear: 0 feet Parking: 2 spaces/bay *Bars/Nightclubs Not Allowed Due to Distance to Church 5 Staff Recommendation Approval of the "CG -2" General Commercial District PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0617-03 INFOR No. 17ZN1021 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 26, 2017 a Owner: CC Ventures Equities IV, LP a - 0 Applicant/Representative: Saquib Ahmed u 00 Location Address: 6802 Weber Road CL� 5 Legal Description: Being 0.839 acres of of the west 170 feet of Foxwood Q 06 o Estates Phase I 11, Block 11, Lot 2, located along the east side of Weber Road, north of Bratton Road, and south of Saratoga Boulevard. From: "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District To: "CG-2" General Commercial District Area: 0.893 acres 'F_o Cr Purpose of Request: To allow for the construction of an Express Tunnel Car N °' Wash on the western portion of the property fronting Weber Road and retain the Neighborhood Commercial on the eastern portion of the property to act as a zoning buffer. Existing Zoning District Existing Land Future Land Use "CN-1" Neighborhood Site Vacant Commercial Commercial District ""CG-2" General North Commercial Commercial oCommercial � N "CN-1" Neighborhood C South Commercial Commercial J Commercial District y East "RS-6" Single-Family 6 Low Density Medium Density ' Residential Residential w West "IL" Light Industrial Commercial Commercial 08 Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries c c of the Southside Area Development Plan and is planned for commercial uses. The proposed rezoning to the "CG-2" General Commercial District is consistent a c with the adopted Future Land Use Map and Southside ADP. a Map No.: 047034 Zoning Violations: None 0 Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 215 0 feet of street frontage along Weber Road which is designated as an "AY CL Primary Arterial Divided Street. c� L Staff Report Page 2 Urban Proposed Existing Traffic Street Transportation Plan ai � Type Section Section Volume L O C Weber Road "AY Primary Arterial 95' ROW 90' ROW 3,301 ADT 64' paved 70' paved (2013) Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District to allow for the construction of an Express Tunnel Carwash on the western portion of the property fronting Weber Road and retain the Neighborhood Commercial on the eastern portion of the property to act as a zoning buffer. The Neighborhood Commercial District portion would be developed as retail space for lease. Development Plan: The subject property is comprised of 0.893 acres and is proposed to be an Express Tunnel Carwash fronting Weber Road with a 15,000 sf. leased retail building on the remainder of the property adjacent to the abutting residential use. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District and is vacant land. To the east is Summer Wind Village subdivision with single-family residences zoned "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District. The subdivision was platted in 2013. To the north, rezoning cases occurred in 1981 to "CG-2" General Commercial District and is operating as a self-storage facility. To the south is a convenience store with fuel sales and is zoned "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, which was rezoned in 2005. To the east, across Weber Road is "IL" Light Industrial District, rezoned in 1982, with uses that include a pest control center and gym/recreational facility. AICUZ: The subject property is located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). It is located in the APZ-2 zone. It meets the compatibility requirement of SLCUM 55 in and APZ-2 zone as outlined in the Unified Development Code. The Airport Operations Manager confirmed the use is appropriate. Plat Status: The property is platted. PlanCC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "CG-2" General Commercial is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and with the following policies of the Southside ADP and PlanCC: • High-intensity commercial and industrial areas should be buffered to provide transition from low-density residential areas through the existence of: A) Main roads; B) Public and institutional buildings; C) Open space; D) Scale of design; and E) Other transitional land uses. (Southside ADP Policy Statement 8.6) • Corpus Christi is able to attract and retain firms because of its competitive assets and supportive business environment. (Plan CC, Element 4, Goal 2). Staff Report Page 3 • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas. (PIanCC, Element 7, Goal 1, Strategy 4). • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use. (PIanCC, Element 7, Goal 1, Strategy 5). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is compatible with the Future Land Use Map, PIanCC, and the Southside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning is also compatible with neighboring properties and with the general character of the surrounding area. • Surrounding properties have been rezoned with a pattern towards commercial development. • The dryers for the bay face Weber Road and according to the specifications emit 75 decibels at 100 feet. • The compression for the vacuum system consist of one compressor that will be placed underground. • The property abutting the residential zoning will remain CN-1 to maintain the current buffer to protect the residences. The retail development will still need to abide all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC). Specific requirements would entail a 10 foot buffer between the CN-1 and residential with 10 points to obtain. Additionally, the "CN-1" District does not allow bars, pubs, taverns, or nightclubs. • The use is appropriate for the APZ-2 overlay. • There was a previous case in 2005 for multi-family and commercial use for this property. At that time the application specified the land would be used for multi- family and commercial uses, however, the specific commercial use was not indicated at that time. The application was denied for the multifamily use and the commercial use was maintained. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (July 26, 20171 Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District. Vote Results: For: 6 Opposed: 0 Absent: 3 Abstained: 0 Staff Report Page 4 Number of Notices Mailed — 14 within 200-foot notification area 5 outside notification area 0 As of September 5, 2017: In Favor — 1 inside notification area o — 0 outside notification area z In Opposition — 0 inside notification area a3 — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.0% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) C. Outdoor Dryer Noise Diagram and Underground Vacuum Pump Noise Diagram D. Site Plan K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0617-03 CC Ventures Equities IV,LP\Council Documents\CC Report_0617-03_CC Ventures Equities IV,LP.docx R M,- 1 L " 4.0* .. O 0 m G-2 a SUBJECTi " L PROPERTY a " VN.o� a " 12 Q� q'OO a <<O'S'O 1 RS 6 s " a Y " 0 3� 6 14 13 syq�0 41>1 Li NNS 6 C - 1 4 " RIS-6 C 'Q O m h S ,. h RS- 6 a 4 m RgTT " �N,Q Date-Create d:6,1312017 0 400 800 IPA part,By:JeremyM Feet " Departme tofD 1opm�t.Seivices CASE: 0617-03 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM-1 Multifamily 1 IL Light Industrial RM-2 Multifamily 2 IH HeavyIndustrial -7 �c 0 RM-3 Multifamily 3 PUD Planned Unit Dev.Overlay <•Lp m ON Professional Office RS-10 Single-Family 10 .�Shc3 ��• RM-AT Multifamily AT RS-6 Single-Family 6 SUBJECT S'l` '��� CN-1 Neighborhood Commercial RS-4.5 Single-Family 4.5 CN-2 Neighborhood Commercial ----- -- PROPERTY RS-TF Two-Family RS-15 Single-Family 15 CR-1 Resort Commercial �� CR-2 Resort Commercial RE Residential Estate CG-1 General Commercial ~` RS-TH Townhouse _F.M:43 �Qe ��•� `�•.,, CG-2 General CommercialPermit SP Special Perm if Cl Intensive Commercial RV Recreational Vehicle Park CBD Downtown Commercial RMH Manufactured Home tiP CR-3 Resort Commercial K FR Farm Rural H Historic Overlay BP Business Park W 5 E a Subject Property O Owners with 200'buffer in favor " City Of Corpus 4 Owners within 200'listed on X Owners �`•.,, attached ownership table /�in LOCATION MAP opposition Christi EXHIBIT A V1 i", "',I d9["i I t.;p'+4"1d1 5 r m' �hIIR 1q N pNf tlNµ�°9rr iii g Nur eBYttp mnrmryou� p mimnercrmrcar%kmanH¢NmN,kwF' City of Corpus Christi uN u � a�Iahi � ¢� r °� m¢���p�rmpAiuuA¢Irar�ivuuvuruvuA�wur Development Services Dept. � mu�9 1W �al�w� if1»mn,F,Ga�,,,�rHr�IFrr�nrrr,F,�� fl ��pl GNaryl @ A P.O. Box 9277 a�ti�� �i�� ¢�� ���� �III� �r��1 �u Q��r� Oma, d�� fi� Corpus Christi,Texas 78469 i00th0,3406 17 JiI.Vlh, 1 2017 1 578500040010 F INC 61R5 S UPPER BROADWAY Corpus Christi,TX 78401 1 L 15 2017 rL �. j wY ii V "u�iie I e l p r K 1 PROPS TY",F n "p.. •w , t r d° , M " r N r s nu" y. ., r +a OF ��eMgN , CASE: 0617-03 � SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING ubjeLf �m "✓ .proped'kW PtlpA•9 Il�dtaPimroWgA AL IL4pwu 0n�va ¢GO,. PtlWA.7 raarvU��.4 Puc ftd o-w g DI ., SUBJECT` VA 4"'Y' -0m AWJ/^Pd'wM1. wMm 4ygd WvvdRmm Ulru�inmq 9gAP1.m IaA fa � Wm.vs tlWMmm . �AA.w91 .6PmaarlPq AT 4.'N7•A V¢ ighl-11Ammd Cnumaromuebm,,. 0+,3-4 W wrropum dwxrat¢p CG¢.Y 06aPPrA CcwnrmgGecra' R3.97 4„AP+A UP1¢mmu$�fmmprowg¢Clml RS IS CN�2 im¢P ICmma anmPv;.ImP &I� Idem IAGWxUn �, r ¢P.mYopUmI Stlamrromrr.AmU IF, ft mOgftm 4�r•;q Mft-mtCaro �1 mW 0, m0ad O'�rorwrq m u �A �GmwaAGa emrw mAu PPB�f.ARy RBIDMmn 4imefl—;¢. a USPm:..IP.U61m U. CR-1 IWmmrovIc..pve—wo UPABM AaMY19AAkG1A1fa4A 4d4NAmm 4dPNroAmetm ASvmPAaq f Y I SRI 1Atonaia F.M RIP LOCATION MAPrsa�� EXHIBIT B Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at( 1) -3240. Personas con inc pci s. gue fienen la intenc!6n de asistir a esta Junta v gue regul ren servicios a peciales, se les su0ica-aue den aviso 48 horas antes dela junta Ilamando al deriartamento de servicios de dsarrllo, al numero(361)826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at ( 1) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the I meeting. Si usted desea dirigirse a la commission durante la junta y su ingles es limit favor de Ilamar al i departamento de serviios de desarrollo al numero (361) -3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar un int6rprete ser prsente durante.la junta. � �mmmm, m. ..,.., - .... . , CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0617-03 CC Ventures Eguities IV. LP. haspetitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from t " N-1" Neighborhood CommercialDistrict the - " General Commercial, [2§ylting i u t . The property to be rezoned is describeds: Being the west 170 feet of Foxwood EstatesIII, Block 11, Lot , located side of Weber Road, north of Brattont r . The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an intermediate zoning classification for Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent i the is Comprehensive I ill also have the effect of amendingthe o pr esive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a publichearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held , July urin one of the PlanningCommission's regular tin s, which begins at ., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited o attend this public headng to express your views on this rezoning request. r more information, please call ( 1) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FOM UST FILL OUT, SIGN Y U RENT �.R P R7Y �EO AND1441 „ AILE I ITS Ni T TDEVELOPMENTSERVICES ®EPA T E T, P. 0. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 74 - 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES LIC RECORD. -.._,. ............. ...� ..... a..® T I ccrdn it the tannin isslon - s, icsi shall be held by a member or members o this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal,either at home oroffice,or in person, by telephone call or by letter. �w Printed Name.-- r ss: jtl k t � Ile, (�1N FAVOR ( ) IN OPPOSITION Phone:,-,l ' :Ilk Signature SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Case No.0617-03 INFOR Case No.; 17 N1021 Project Manager.Laura Sheldon Property Owner ID: 1 ail: LauraS2@cctexas.com EXHIBIT B a.vu.r. s irala9 N.o.l..s.e wA iilb Vacuum OFF* 70 dba 4 � Y Ili E i a 10 Feet 133- 1a 40 w 20 t 0- lba m I umm wm 73 .......................... ........��...�.m .•m w ... . 57,100 ..........50 Feet „ .... - I 50Feaa WOE II 70A E AIVICw f. ............ "I � I l IIEE:, I�, x e—111119 THE CMWASH FACTORY GARG 1IVL"MwN liui�•IiV;oG A6pu. moAkwnal�IXA�aiwanaro;mo�;�y I uAurCn'Aw'AM1illklo>wu°!SYvIInaA%;cJmr uVlauua�A Ax%wx ulwcr.mu.n.WMW Pw ”"""""' a uro� II aWel111 pT 1NI�w l" dura IImINIpA`;�NuW:GIIICMd mu�ox"VdAry�lm�UwalrVWk'" ummanlmw�mnyry dro uumrrm,,>N, •W wwam�Iwlllro wMwla ro mrArorvunwav . 7„p 04' wrmvmm uurA umm�m rmcwmn a cerme�la lw,mw wcnw,prn;vw CNN a IDela47h um':m.„a,murm+m rvw w•,r �••••••.•..................................................................................................... am war mro T GAF EXHIBIT C UNDERGROUND VACUUM PUMP 2 � 44 44 '4 F 44 TMERANUS ,r 0 I ENTERPRISES .mrew•rm'crax'�no° 'w'a ror,l 1 2 TseWASHF v IRY w�¢.��au.��msamuau;ua� 13k.&JYflPkWt A$SEM.13P."tl°ONE Ba68Y,„t9 4:5h9P mm.Ilr�u°gym uAS um�. w a�u'�w�m. rmti,m.*• �w'��w.a-,'�M^�,'�„a�uuv,�w'.0 w'u:w,wwmm»�v:�'.0 nu cem arvuaz°om pawassn w• »a1. °u, ° u.°°w.re nmem m.�,,wr w c ruv D min•, m m ,+.;mem "d w,4 -� ,."d rl uw-,man�f °,o"m III Muout�mm;»umv.'w n” ^^pp pq,p� q Ikp ryp Ill iw1fi l6'Mdv,wy'4» 'tri wC. II�I+iW & t`I�'fl,"„ .6 bXd" &A II M.o II.�•• EXHIBIT C OUTDOOR DRYERS FACING WEBER ROAD SONNY'S CARWASH DESIGN SERVICES O O R23'—O' r ss 00 44 1= 1 P 15'-0" ,k rAv S `T APE IIP YIN. neo. 9 jE 214.83' T unnei 10 Vac-Boom(11'_W) 10 Vac-Boom(11'_W) 100'Conveyor —40 O Lr 1 li L O 0 107'-4" 15' SB -B/L 215.00' Best Seffingl WEBER ROAD 12,000 PMIS In steam 1 7 —14, ,' Affada le Controls! Hands -On Ibbdngl SITE LEGEND Handicap Parking Proposed Curb Site Boundary Line Center Line of Rood Setbacks GENERAL NOTES 1. All center line of road curb radii to be 23' unless otherwise noted. 2. all vocuum spaces ore s'—t0• unless otherwise noted. PRELIMINARY PLAN NOTE This plan hos been prepared with the best available information provided by the customer, without the benefit of O50)00y in some cases. the engineer has not conducted any code re arch regarding. but not limited to. permitted uses. setbacks, buffers, access, required parking, landscaping, far, ISR, storm water management, utilities, right of way acquisition or easements to benefit accurate layout orientation and configuration. DISCLAIMER: Although building codes have been const dered In developing this dr wing, verification of site specific conditions and compliance with Federal, State & local building codes is the eKdus ve responsibility of the Customer and/or Architect & Engineer. These drawings reflect requirements for SONNY'S FURNISHED EQUIPMENT ONLY mess otherwise noted. Please refer to other manufacturers, If any, for their requirements. CONFIDENTIAL WARNING: This she t contains and constitutes confidential information, images, & trade seer is of SONNY'S Enterprises, Inc. Any unauthorized use or disclosure to any or portion thereof, is st ictly prohibited. This work is the exclusive property of SONNY'S Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17301—05— AHMED FAIZ—CORPUS e Sheet Rev. Scale: N.T.S. Location: TX 01 -0- EXHIBIT D Ui 5) 0 to I) co-oO U co U) N ) O IL N :O V ch CARWASH LAYOUT SC o� � v AGENDA MEMORANDUM NORPgRp�EO First Reading for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 1852 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting September 26, 2017 DATE: September 5, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Markle, Chief of Police mikema cctexas.com 886-2603 Accepting and appropriating the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) grant within the Police Department CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division in the amount of$51,920.42 for the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Program within the Police Department with a cash match of$12,926.93 and an in-kind match of$8,280.00 for a total project cost of$73,127.34; appropriating the $51,920.42 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund for the VAWA grant in the Police Department; and authorizing the transfer of$12,926.93 from the No. 1020 General Fund to the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund and appropriating the same for a total project cost of$73,127.34. PURPOSE: Year 18 funding is available from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division, under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that provides funds to projects with the primary mission of reducing and preventing violence against women BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The grant continues support for the Family Violence Unit that utilizes officers and volunteers to contact family violence victims when a written report is made by a field officer or from a walk-in to the unit at the Police Department. The grant provides funds for one victim case manager to contact victims who often fear retaliation and violence when the offender is released following arrest; contact with an advocate (case manager) can provide information concerning alternatives, available services, and protective orders to avoid continued violence. The case manager serves to establish and encourage a working relationship between social agencies and the Police Department and provides educational opportunities to the community through speaking engagements, distribution of literature, etc. The long term goal of the grant is to provide victims of domestic violence and other serious crimes with crisis intervention, follow up assistance, encourage cooperation with law enforcement, facilitate utilization of available resources, and assist with immediate and long- term safety needs. The State provides $51,920.42 for the salary/benefits of one Victim Case Manager, equipment, supplies, training, and mileage, volunteer hours contribute $8,280 in-kind contribution, and the City contributes $12,926.93 for training, travel, supplies and miscellaneous equipment as the required match. This grant period will be 9/1/2017— 8/31/2018. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to all city policies. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non-Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Finance Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Project to Date Fiscal Year: 2016- Expenditures 2017 CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $12,926.93 $12,926.93 BALANCE Fund(s): Police Grants Fund Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the award and appropriating the funds. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division in the amount of$51,920.42 for the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Program within the Police Department with a cash match of $12,926.93 and an in-kind match of$8,280.00 for a total project cost of $73,127.34; appropriating the $51,920.42 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund for the VAWA grant in the Police Department; and authorizing the transfer of$12,926.93 from the No. 1020 General Fund to the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund and appropriating the same for a total project cost of$73,127.34. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division in the amount of$51,920.42 to continue the Violence Against Women Formula Grant (VAWA) grant within the Police Department with a cash match of$12,926.93 and an in-kind match of$8,280.00 for a total project cost of$73,127.34. SECTION 2. That $51,920.42 grant is appropriated in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund to continue the VAWA grant in the Police Department. SECTION 3. The transfer of$12,926.93 from the No. 1020 General Fund to the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund as grant matching funds is authorized and appropriated for a total project cost of$73,127.34. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Office of the Govemor Page I of 2 Statement of Grant Award(SOGA) The Statement of Grant Award is the official notice of award from the Office of the Governor(OOG).This Grant Agreement and all terms,conditions,provisions and obligations set forth herein shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns and all other State of Texas agencies and any other agencies,departments, divisions,governmental entities,public corporations,and other entities which shall be successors to each of the Parties or which shall succeed to or become obligated to perform or become bound by any of the covenants,agreements or obligations hereunder of each of the Parties hereto. The approved project narrative and budget for this award are reflected in eGrants on the'Narrative' and 'Budget/Details' tabs. By accepting the Grant Award in eGrants,the Grantee agrees to strictly comply with the requirements and obligations of this Grant Agreement including any and all applicable federal and state statutes,regulations,policies,guidelines and requirements. In instances where conflicting requirements apply to a Grantee,the more restrictive requirement applies. The Grant Agreement includes the Statement of Grant Award;the OOG Grantee Conditions and Responsibilities;the Grant Application in eGrants;and the other identified documents in the Grant Application and Grant Award, including but not limited to:2 CFR Part 200,Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;Chapter 783 of the Texas Government Code,Title 34,Part 1,Chapter 20,Subchapter I of the Texas Administrative Code,and the Uniform Grant Management Standards(UGMS)developed by the Comptroller of Public Accounts;the state Funding Announcement or Solicitation under which the grant application was made,and for federal funding,the Funding Announcement or Solicitation under which the OOG was awarded funds;and any applicable documents referenced in the documents listed above. For grants awarded from the U.S. Department of Justice,the current applicable version of the Department of Justice Grants Financial Guide and any applicable provisions in Title 28 of the CFR apply.For grants awarded from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA),all Information Bulletins and Policies published by the FEMA Grants Program Directorate apply.The OOG reserves the right to add additional responsibilities and requirements,with or without advance notice to the Grantee. By clicking on the'Accept'button within the'Accept Award'tab,the Grantee accepts the responsibility for the grant project, agrees and certifies compliance with the requirements outlined in the Grant Agreement,including all provisions incorporated herein,and agrees with the following conditions of grant funding.The grantee's funds will not be released until the grantee has satisfied the requirements of the following Condition(s)of Funding and Other Fund-Specific Requirement(s),if any,cited below: Grant Number- 1517119 Award Amount: $51,920,42 Date Awarded: 8,130,2017 Grantee Cash Match: $12,926.93 Grant Period: 091,,'o U2017-03i3l/2018 Grantee In Kind Match: $8,280.00 Liquidation Date: 0612912018 Total Project Cost: $73,127435 Program Fund: WF-Violence Against Women Formula Grants Grantee Name: Corpus Christi,City of Project Title: Victim Assistance Program Grant Manager: Donald Stout DUNS Number: 069457786 CFA: 16.588-Violence Against Women Formula Grants Federal Awarding U.S.Department of Justice,Office on Violence Against Women Agency: Federal Award 9,,272016 Date: Federal/State '7016-WF-AX-0034 Award ID Number: Total Federal Award/State Funds $10,698,475.00 Appropriated: Pass Thru Entity Texas Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division(CJD) Name: Is the Award R&D: No https:Hegrants.gov.texas.gov/project/awardstatement.aspx?i2=4&i1-8&gh- 4-6D-56-5D-7... 9/6/2017 Office of the Govemor Page 2 of 2 Federal/State The STOP Program continues to encourage the development and implementation of effective,victim AwardDescription: centered law enforcement,prosecution,and court strategies to address violent crimes against women and the development and enhancement of victim services in cases involving violent crimes against women. It envisions a partnership among law enforcement,prosecution,courts,and victim services organizations to enhance victim safety and hold offenders accountable for their crimes against women. List of os-Award Conditions of Funding and Other Fund-Specific Requirements Hold old Condition of Funding/Project Requirement Date Drente Late et Project Line Funs em Funds Other Condition of Funding. Please note the grant end date has been changed to 3/3112 18 due to the end of the federal fund block.CID will request an extension of the fund block to accommodate the full 12 month grant period. If G1T2017 the extension is granted,the end date will be extended to 33112018. If we have not received an extension by the new grant end date,extension may be processed through 6/30/18 with a 30 day liquidation https:Hcgrants.gov.texas.gov/project/awardstatement.aspx?i2=4&i l=8 gh 4-6 -56-5 -7... 9/612017 SC o� � v AGENDA MEMORANDUM NORPgRp�EO First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 1852 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 5, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Markle, Chief of Police mikema cctexas.com 886-2604 Accepting and appropriating the State 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program grant CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the Texas Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division through the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, in the amount of$11,241.00 for the State FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program; and appropriating the $11,241.00 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund to fund the enhancement of law enforcement efforts by the Police Department. PURPOSE: Accept the grant and appropriate the funds. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This grant is the State solicitation part of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. It is a different solicitation from the Local JAG GRANT. Applications are submitted to the State Criminal Justice Division and the local COG sets priorities for the grants. JAG funds can be used for state and local initiatives, technical assistance, training, personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, and information systems for criminal justice for any one or more of the following purpose areas: Law enforcement programs • Prosecution and court programs Prevention and education programs • Drug enforcement programs Corrections, community corrections and reentry programs Technology improvement programs System assessment and program evaluation The funds will be used to enhance law enforcement efforts. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to all city policies. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non-emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Finance Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Project to Date Fiscal Year: 2016- Expenditures 2017 (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 1 $11,241.00 $11,241.00 BALANCE 1 $11,241.00 $11,241.00 Fund(s): Police Grants Fund Comments: There is no match required by the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the grant and appropriating the funds. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Grant award letter Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the Texas Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division through the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, in the amount of$11,241.00 for the State FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program; and appropriating the $11,241.00 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund to fund the enhancement of law enforcement efforts by the Police Department BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept a grant from the Texas Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division through the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, in the amount of$11,241.00 for the State FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. SECTION 2. That $11,241.00 is appropriated in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund for the enhancement of law enforcement efforts by the Police Department. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Office of the Governor Page I of 2 Statement of Grant Award(SOCA) The Statement of Grant Award is the official notice of award from the Office of the Governor(OOG).This Grant Agreement and all terms,conditions,provisions and obligations set forth herein shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns and all other State of Texas agencies and any other agencies,departments, divisions,governmental entities,public corporations,and other entities which shall be successors to each of the Parties or which shall succeed to or become obligated to perform or become bound by any of the covenants,agreements or obligations hereunder of each of the Parties hereto. The approved project narrative and budget for this award are reflected in eGrants on the'Narrative' and 'Budget/Details' tabs. By accepting the Grant Award in eGrants,the Grantee agrees to strictly comply with the requirements and obligations of this Grant Agreement including any and all applicable federal and state statutes,regulations,policies,guidelines and requirements. In instances where conflicting requirements apply to a Grantee,the more restrictive requirement applies. The Grant Agreement includes the Statement of Grant Award;the OOG Grantee Conditions and Responsibilities;the Grant Application in eGrants;and the other identified documents in the Grant Application and Grant Award, including but not limited to:2 CFR Part 200,Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;Chapter 783 of the Texas Government Code,Title 34, Part 1,Chapter 20, Subchapter I of the Texas Administrative Code,and the Uniform Grant Management Standards(UGMS)developed by the Comptroller of Public Accounts;the state Funding Announcement or Solicitation under which the grant application was made,and for federal funding,the Funding Announcement or Solicitation under which the OOG was awarded funds;and any applicable documents referenced in the documents listed above. For grants awarded from the U.S. Department of Justice,the current applicable version of the Department of Justice Grants Financial Guide and any applicable provisions in Title 28 of the CFR apply.For grants awarded from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA),all Information Bulletins and Policies published by the FEMA Grants Program Directorate apply.The OOG reserves the right to add additional responsibilities and requirements,with or without advance notice to the Grantee. By clicking on the'Accept'button within the'Accept Award'tab,the Grantee accepts the responsibility for the grant project, agrees and certifies compliance with the requirements outlined in the Grant Agreement, including all provisions incorporated herein,and agrees with the following conditions of grant funding.The grantee's funds will not be released until the grantee has satisfied the requirements of the following Condition(s)of Funding and Other Fund-Specific Requirement(s),if any,cited below: Grant Number: 3358801 Award Amount: $11,241,00 Date Awarded- 8130,f2017 Grantee Cash Match: $0.00 Grant Period: 10/o F2017-09/3082018 Grantee In Kind $0,00 Match: Liquidation 1 2/29120 1 8 Total Project Cost: $11,241,00 Date: Program Fund: DJ-Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Grantee Name: Corpus Christi,City of Project Title: Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Grant Manager: Sylvia Garcia DUNS Number: 069457786 CF A: 16.738-Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Justice,Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance Federal Award Date: 9)212015 Federal/State Award ID Number: 2015-DJ-BX-0956 Total Federal Award/State Funds $12,350,323.00 Appropriated: Pass Thru Entity Name: Texas Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division(CJD) Is the Award R&D: No Federal/State Award Description: The purpose of this program is to reduce crime and improve the criminal justice system. https://egrants.gov.texas.gov/project/awardstatement.aspx?i2�,,,-�,4&il= g ,;,,02-DF-EO-35-7... 9/5 2017 Office of the Govemor Page 2 of 2 hist of Post-Award Conilkiims ofFunding and Other Fund-Specific Requirements ............................................................................................ Hold Hold Condition of Funding/Project Requirement Date Date Met Project Line Created Funds Item Funds ........................................................................... .................................................. Resolution:Applications from nonprofit corporations,local units of governments,and other political subdivisions must submit a resolution electronically using the'Upload'function in the eGrants system.The resolution must contain the following: . Authorization by your governing body for the submission of the application to OOG that clearly identifies the name of the project for which funding is requested; 417,i2017 • A commitment to provide all applicable matching funds; • A designation of the name and/or title of an authorized official who is given the authority to apply for,accept,reject,alter,or terminate a grant (Note: If a name is provided,you must update OOG should the official change during the grant period.);and . A written assurance that,in the event of loss or misuse of grant funds,the governing body will return all funds to OOG. ..................................................................................................................................................................................... System of Award Management(SAM): Registration with SAM is required by all OOG applicants.Applicants are required to maintain current registrations in the System for Award Management(SAM)database.The SAM database is the repository for standard information about federal financial assistance applicants,recipients,and subrecipients.Applicants must update or renew 61,9121017 &30/201 7 their SAM registration at least once per year to maintain an active status. Information about registration procedures can be accessed at https://egrants.gov.texas.gov/project/awardstatement.aspx?i2=4&iI=8&gh=02-DF-EO-35-7... 9/5/2017 SC o� � v AGENDA MEMORANDUM NORPgRp�EO Public Hearing/First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of 9/26/17 1852 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of 10/10/17 DATE: September 1, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, AICP, CFM, Assistant Director of Planning & ESI DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-7011 Proposed Adoption of the Downtown Area Development Plan CAPTION: Ordinance adopting a new Area Development Plan for the City of Corpus Christi titled "The Downtown Area Development Plan"; Rescinding the Central Business Development Plan adopted by City Council ordinance #092842, May 21, 2013; amending the boundaries of the Downtown Area Development Plan to include North Beach; providing for severance; and providing for publication. PURPOSE: The current Area Development Plan for Downtown, the Central Business Development Plan, was adopted on May 21, 2013 as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Due to growth in Corpus Christi, and the new Harbor Bridge Project, many opportunities are being presented in the Downtown Area. To ensure that the Downtown Area of Corpus Christi develops in a way that promotes economic growth, a high quality of life, safety, creativity, and connectivity, the Downtown Area Development Plan (DTADP) has been drafted. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: City Staff has been working with the consultant firm Goody Clancy & Associates to draft the Downtown Area Development Plan, which includes: vision themes, priority policy initiatives and implementation plans, infrastructure initiatives, district framework, framework for development guideline's within TIRZ #3, and transportation initiatives. The Downtown Area Development Plan is a result of an eight-month process of comprehensive and intensive public outreach. An Advisory Committee was established at the onset of the planning process to guide the City and consultants towards the recommendations in the DTADP. A series of open public meetings were held November 18-20, 2014, February 24, 2015, and May 21, 2015. Following a series of stakeholder meetings, public meetings, technical analysis and recommendations, the initiative culminated in a draft plan document dated November 2015. Work on the DTADP was suspended at that time to allow focus on completing and adopting the Corpus Christi Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC). With the adoption of Plan CC in the fall of 2016, the DTADP has been updated to reflect current conditions and input received during a series of stakeholder meetings held on March 1st 2017 and a July 24th, 2017 Open House at City Hall. The Major goals and policies of the Downtown Area Development Plan address the following: Five Vision Themes • Encouraging market-driven development • Creating more housing choices • Completing a waterfront park and trail network • Reconnecting neighborhoods • Celebrating a unique place to live, work, and play Three Priority Policy Initiatives Categories • Real estate reinvestment • Infrastructure • Great places for people Infrastructure Initiatives • Parks and paths • Parking • Streetscape • Roadway changes and/or other major street improvements • Utility/ infrastructure • Transit District Framework for Downtown Area neighborhoods • Marina Arts District • Bayshore Neighborhood • Uptown and surrounding neighborhoods • Washington-Coles • Hillcrest • SEA District • North Beach Development Guidelines for TIRZ #3 • Primary Walking Street • Flexible Access Street • Gateway Corridor or Boulevard ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the proposed Downtown Area Development Plan with suggestions to the Planning & ESI Department OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The proposed Downtown Area Development Plan conforms to City policy. EMERGENCY/ NON-EMERGENCY: Non- Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: All City Departments; Planning Commission — recommended approval August 23, 2017 FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital x Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the adoption of the Downtown Area Development Plan. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation Survey Results Exhibit A: Downtown Area Development Plan Draft Exhibit B: Appendix A, Real Estate Market Analysis for housing, office, hotel, and retail Exhibit C: Appendix B, Advisory Committee Members Ordinance Ordinance adopting a new Area Development Plan for the City of Corpus Christi titled "The Downtown Area Development Plan; Rescinding the Central Business Development Plan adopted by City Council ordinance #025658; providing for severance; and providing for publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the adoption of the Downtown Area Development Plan. WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 23, 2017, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, September 26, 2017, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; WHEREAS, City Staff invited the public to workshops and public meetings that were held on November 18-20, 2014, February 24, 2015, and May 21, 2015 to give input to help develop a Downtown Area Development Plan for Corpus Christi, and to receive public feedback, City Staff held an Open House regarding the Downtown Area Development Plan on July 24, 2017. WHEREAS, a Community Advisory Committee provided guidance and assistance throughout the process and staff coordinated with various community agencies. WHEREAS, the city shall use the Downtown Area Development Plan as a guideline to facilitate other plans that the city considers necessary for systematic growth and development. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that these amendments would best serve public health, safety, necessity, convenience, and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Corpus Christi Central Business Development Plan, previously named the Corpus Christi South Central Area Development Plan, adopted by City Council ordinance #025658 on February 17, 2004 and amended by City Council ordinance #029842 on May 28, 2013 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 2. That the Downtown Area Development Plan, including: vision themes, priority policy initiatives and implementation plans, infrastructure initiatives, district framework, framework for development guideline's within TIRZ #3, transportation initiatives, and all other components of the Downtown Area Development Plan, are adopted by this ordinance to read shown as exhibits attached and incorporated by reference: A. Downtown Area Development Plan, B. Appendix A, Real estate market analysis documents for housing, office, hotel, and retail. C. Appendix B, Downtown Area Development Plan Advisory Committee Members SECTION 3. To the extent that the amendment made by this ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the amendment made by this ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time and except as changed by this ordinance, remains in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The City Council intends that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof shall be given full force and effect for its purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, that judgment shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance. SECTION 5. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20177 by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey-Opel PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Downtown Area Development Plan City Council Presentation September 26, 2017 A new era for the Downtown Area • Market-driven, action -oriented plan • Primarily developed in 2014-2015, building upon R/UDAT, Harbor Bridge planning • Finalized to reflect current conditions • Key ideas are producing results ProwutIIg vibrant and 2ecessilda utstssu�mn destination walkable setttII MARINA ARTS DISTRICT L3-rsraging in(rastiunturo investment and Ming the gaps with lion/warWham/piny annutmg aeightertemdpla s andpaa-. the Bay aTal destination parks WBAIIBBRGER FIELG Strengthening an es[•ahlished neighhorhnod with connected struts and busing CITY IWEL CMS 3LRWB FSPY Providing Musing options and npwrtunitias fir current residents Ewpereang choices for housing, lobs, and trenspertafien Process: communication & research • Public & stakeholder meetings • Real estate market and feasibility analysis • Multi -modal transportation analysis coordinated with Harbor Bridge project • Urban design scenarios 2017 Community Engagement • Advisory Committee Meetings (2) • Stakeholder Meetings (4) • Presentations at Community Events (4 • July 24 Open House • Public Survey (81) • Planning Commission Presentations (2) Vision themes • Encourage market- driven development • Create more housing choices . Complete a waterfront park and trail network • Reconnect neighborhoods • Celebrate this unique place to live, work, learn, and play Ten initiatives Three categories: Real estate reinvestment Great places for people • Utilize TIRZ #3 to unlock market-driven development with flexible, effective options serving the different incentive needs of different projects • 9 projects TIRZ#3 REAL ESTATE EST T TIRZ#3 • Utilize TIRZ #3 to unlock market- driven development with flexible, effective options serving the different incentive needs of different projects • 9 projects REAL ESTATE EST T Public/private partnership • Target tax abatement and other incentives to reinforce neighborhoods with new jobs and mixed - income housing REAL ESTATETMENT rtd ntives.Ass3te g add�g the agrses d Laredo oto the FIR2 �3 to inveas th iz pot I .�_ � trceFltiuec g Public/private partnership • Target tax abatement and other incentives to reinforce neighborhoods with new jobs and mixed - income housing REAL ESTATETMENT �� /� DanrswdYar add�g the Agnes Laredo corridors:into theTIR2 3areatm their prnential FiL� Activate vacant properties REAL ESTATE REINVESTMENT • Proactively encourage redevelopment of well -located underutilized properties • Historic Nueces County Courthouse /Former Bus Station Po 1 e nt DRAFT PRIORITY POUCY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1XUL buai Ls -. ou-vu.firec vWrr, Future Harbor Bridge alignment Improve key streets, parks • Invest in prioritized infrastructure projects in concert with private development • Shoreline Blvd. and Water's Edge Park improvements are attracting development Park more efficiently • Organize parking at district scale to increase convenience and efficiency • TIRZ#3 parking study provides new guidelines for pricing, management 1 Organize event traffic • Actively manage event traffic • Improved coordination among event sponsors & city departments is improving access Organize event traffic • Actively manage event traffic • Improved coordination among event sponsors & city departments is improving access -55 Re -connect streets • Transform old Harbor Bridge infrastructure to connect districts and the bay with walkable development. • Harbor Bridge design, Bike Mobility Plan advancing Re -connect streets • Transform old Harbor Bridge infrastructure to connect districts and the bay with walkable development, access • Harbor Bridge design, Bike Mobility Plan advancing Where Fun Happens • Intensify destination arts and retail programming • Marina Arts District brand launched. Expanded farmers/ art market, food trucks, mural program GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE Where Fun Happens • Intensify destination arts and retail programming • Marina Arts District brand launched. Expanded farmers/ art market, food trucks, mural program GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE Embrace the Waterfront GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE • Fill missing links in Corpus Christi's signature waterfront park and path network • Marina docks, Shoreline Boulevard, and Water's Edge Park are attracting people, investment DRAFT NUM', MIXT INMATIVES AIM WIMENCITIATMW Wbretd ATM:AIM Embrace the Waterfront GREAT P GES FOR PEOPLE • Fill missing links in Corpus Christi's signature waterfront park and path network • Marina docks, Shoreline Boulevard, and Water's Edge Park are attracting people, investment DRAFT Keep it Clean & Safe • Create clean, safe, welcoming places • Dedicated cleaning staff/ambassadors, bike patrol, volunteers GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE Unique Places in Corpus Christi "Leveraging infrastructure investment aiwifiuling the gaps with live/work/learn/play" vsnore rielanDornooa "Connecting neighborhoods and people to the Bay and destinationparks" Uptritun SurrnilndingMKUIU 'Expanding choices for housing, jobs. and transportation" "Strengthening an established neighborhood with connected streets and housing" HilicrPst "Providing housing options and opportunities for current residents" 5f..rrnictri,5-1-- "Promoting vibrant and accessible destinations within a walkable setting" - 5-5 55-452.515-511 "Beach and attractions" 23 Development Guidelines • Primary Walking Street 24 Development Guidelines • Flexible Access Street` riwaturmigniit Development Guidelines • Gateway Street or Boulevard Fe Recommendation Staff and Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Downtown Area Development Plan Downtown Area Development Plan Survey Results Responses Through September 5, 2017 Where do you live? The Marina Arts Distric The SEA District 1 Uptown and Surrounding Neighborhoods Bayshore Neighborhood North Beach Washington -Coles Hillcrest Elsewhere in Corpus Christi Online Survey Responses 2 Written Survey Responses Total 43 Outside the Corpus Christi City limits 0 *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. % of Total* +2 =4 5% +0 =1 1% +0 =5 6% +1 =2 2% 33% +3 =4 5% +0 =1 1% +10 = 10 12% +5 = 48 59% +0 =7 9% 10 20 30 40 21 82 Total Results: 61 ere do you work? The Marina Arts Distric The SEA Distric Uptown and Surrounding Neighborhoods Bayshore Neighborhood North Beach Washington -Coles Hillcrest Elsewhere in Corpus Christi Outside the Corpus Christi City limits None of the above Online Survey Responses Written Survey % of Responses Total Total* +1 =9 11% +0 =4 5% = 14 17% 44% =2 2% +2 = 4 5% +0 =0 0% +1 =3 4% +7 = 28 35% 0 *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. +0 +1 +0 +8 =4 5% = 13 16% 10 15 20 20 81 Total Results: 61 ded the mon wn Area Development Ptan Open House on July 24th, 2017. Yes Online Survey Responses Written Survey % of Responses Total Total* 10 *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. 20 30 +11 = 36 44% +10 = 46 56% Total Results: 61 21 82 c The five Downtown Area De etopment Plan Vision Throe the vision Strongly agree Online Survey Responses Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Written Survey Responses Total Total* % of Total Results: 61 +4 = 35 43% 65% +5 = 18 22% +12 = 17 21% 21 82 The e n Area Deve p ent12 an Initiatives represent he o Strongly agree So chat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Written Survey Online Survey Responses of Responses Total Total* +3 = 36 44% +5 = 18 22% +12 = 15 19% +1 6% 9% 10 15 20 25 30 21 81 *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. Total Results: 60 67% 15% The Downtown Area Development Plan's Infrastructure Initiatives capture the needs in the Downtown area. See pages 48& 49) Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Written Survey Online Survey Responses 0 % of Responses Total Total* +3 = 33 41% 64% +4 = 19 23% +12 = 17 21% +1 =6 =6 10 15 20 25 30 20 81 Total Results: 61 *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. 7% 14% 7% Th District Identities reflect the unique cha Brent downtown Strongly agree Somewhat agree Online Survey Responses Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Written Survey of Responses Total Total* *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. +2 = 27 33% 1 58% +6 = 20 25% +11 = 18 22% +1 = 10 12% 6 10 15 20 25 20 81 Total Results: 61 7% 20% The City should, adopt design guidelines for Do its. (See pages 90-35 Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Written Survey Responses Total Total* Online Survey Responses % of +2 = 43 53% 81% +13 = 23 28% +4 = 6 7% +1 = 5 6% 11% 4 5% i0 20 30 40 20 81 Total Results: 61 *Note: Sums may not add to totals due to rounding. DR EXHIBITA AREA DEVELOPMENT PLA [ ORDINANCE ADOPTING PLAN 1 EXHIBITA [ ORDINANCE ADOPTING PLAN 1 EXHIBITA CONTENTS 1. Introduction: A new era of opportunity 1 in Corpus Christi Shaping the Downtown Area's future: A unique moment 2 The DADP aligns closely with Corpus Christi's citywide plan 7 Downtown vision themes 8 A community -driven process 10 Taking initiative to seize the opportunity 12 Working together 12 2. Priority Policy Initiatives and Implementation: 17 How to build the Downtown Area vision Vision themes and policy initiatives 19 Framework diagrams 40 Infrastructure initiatives 48 EXHIBITA 3. District Framework and Reinvestment Priorities: 51 Targeted priorities for a vibrant and connected Corpus Christi Marina Arts District 54 Bayshore Neighborhood 62 Uptown and Surrounding Neighborhoods 66 Washington -Coles 70 Hillcrest 74 SEA District 78 North Beach 84 4. Development Guidelines for TIRZ #3 89 Guidelines by street corridor 92 General guidelines 95 5. Transportation 97 Harbor Bridge opportunities 98 Downtown area access improvements 100 Transit alternatives 102 Parking management 104 Abbreviations used in this document 106 Appendices A. Real estate market analysis documents for housing, office, hotel and retail [available separately] B. Advisory Committee Members [available separately] EXHIBIT A c 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 1 i li I �;,I din iii, �V� �t - :: � �� /�/% , i% 'r �� ��� �i, �viii//� i // j�l// �iii%. %/��/�, f�� �ia,.,,i�iii/��� ��hi uuuuuV��„uuum �� I IIV@�IIIV"UWiPiiIV'�1 i ,� i /�i,,,,�;"�/ Oli/� � � ���yiY�ir�ranini��i��! r,. �� ii � r �� .J i. � �..'.�� f` %%� j �� ,;, i ,%, �� ,,,,�, f�r , , �; 0 °��, � . ��, ,i '� / ii ��E � / � � i ' �� �� ,i1 �) L,1J 1 i �,� � �� ,, .,, �� � �� J �l 1, / % � � , ' 1 � � �' � /% ��� r��� � j r i;%. f;. �l�% / �%' a ire»lll,���r/� �� � �'�% �� ��i I %%�, � i /� / 1 �lii� � , j /� �j l� i I'i///�j, �„�, ± � . �, ;, �i � �� %/ i � ;° �,h V, �. r i� �� ,� // r o/ i //�� %l �"i i Introduction neea of e he Downtown Area Development Plan (DADP) is an action -oriented, market-driven strategy to generate economic growth and quality of life in Corpus Christi over the next 20 years. The DADP builds on past planning efforts and current investment in the city, and is part of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan initiative. At its heart, the DADP aims to establish Corpus Christi as a premier 21st Century waterfront city in Texas, with safe, vibrant, walkable, and connected districts in which to live, work, learn, and play. EXHIBITA 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 1 1 DR T INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunityfor Corpus Christi SHAPING THE DOWNTOWN AREA'S FUTURE: A UNIQUE MOMENT This is an exciting time for Corpus Christi. At a moment when people of all ages across the country are seeking out great urban places to live, work, learn, and play, the Downtown Area is primed to capitalize on its unique strengths—its spectacular and accessible wa- terfront, unique destination attrac- tions, people and neighborhoods, and proximity to jobs and transpor- tation options. The Downtown Area addressed by this plan is large and encompasses several related areas: • The Traditional Downtown core—now brand- ed the Marina Arts District—and Uptown • The SEA (Sports, Entertainment, Arts) District • Washington -Coles and Hillcrest neighbor- hoods (note that Hillcrest is in Corpus Chris- ti's Westside Planning Area) • North Beach Today, each area has its strengths and weak- nesses. But taken together the Downtown Area's districts include many of the ingredients that provide the foundation for successful and vibrant downtowns: • An attractive waterfront setting that combines beaches, parks and marinas • An active, walkable district centered along Chaparral Street • Restaurants and entertainment venues • Arts and cultural attractions • Major destination attractions, including the USS Lexington, Texas State Aquarium, Art Mu- seum of South Texas, Corpus Christi Museum of Science & History and several others • Major convention and meeting facilities at American Bank Center • Minor League baseball at Whataburger Field Because of its large size, the overall Downtown Area will continue to develop as a number of distinct areas with their own unique identities, offering complementary attractions and expe- riences. Over the longer term, these areas will become more strongly connected, while retain- ing unique identity and character. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBITA Infrastructure and development initiatives that are already completed or in the works open a wealth of possibilities for further investment that will improve Corpus Christi's near- and long-term future. The planned Harbor Bridge relocation creates a once-in-a-lifetime opportu- nity for the City to work closely with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), commu- nity leaders, and private developers to transform the SEA District, Washington -Coles, Uptown, Downtown and North Beach into more walkable and connected places. Streetscape improvements have made Downtown segments of Chaparral Street and Shoreline Boulevard delightful places to walk. As such, they also invite people to live and work, to enjoy entertainment and tourism, and explore accessible, welcoming waterfront activities that all support each other. The Down- town Area has always been and remains a key driver of Corpus Christi's identity. It has the greatest opportunity in a generation to become a much deeper source of community life and pride. The Downtown Area has notable strengths but it continues to struggle to attract development and businesses due to low foot traffic, a phys- ical environment designed more for cars than people, rent levels too low to justify redevel- opment costs, unpredictable status of various infrastructure and development projects, some challenging adjacencies to industrial activity, perceived lack of safety or cleanliness in places, and a traditional office -dominated identity that does not reflect the much more diverse activity and market opportunities available today. While there are signs that residential development (a major driver of downtown development nation- ally) is beginning to take root downtown, there is significant work to do to tap the full potential that downtown offers as a housing location. This plan, therefore, focuses on the actions that can most effectively diminish the challenges posed by the Downtown Area and open up invest- ment—particularly private investment—that is naturally attracted by the downtown's assets. Downtowns are inherently complex places, and a plan helps organize the actions of many people around common purposes to draw great value from a downtown's intensity of activity. Downtown Corpus Christi already has many stakeholders who are taking important actions toward well -conceived goals, but who also could achieve more, sooner, through increased coordi- nation of these actions. Thus the Downtown Area Development Plan emphasizes "how" to get things done, as much as "what"gets done. INTRODUCTION 1 Anew era ofopportunity for Corpus Christi rre =�-D- BBB- Downtown Area destinations matter signifi- cantly to the local and regional economies—par- ticularly visitor attractions located within the SEA District and North Beach. In 2014, approx- imately 2,750,000 people flocked to the Texas State Aquarium, USS Lexington, Convention Center, Art Museum, Museum of Science and History, Whataburger Field, and Hurricane Alley, an increase of 47% in just three years. These attractions, together with the Downtown Area's nearly 40% share of Corpus Christi hotel rooms, anchor citywide visitor destination spending that exceeded $1.2 billion and provided an overall economic impact of over $1.5 billion for each fiscal year 2012 and 2013. This infusion of outside spending continues to grow. The tour- ism industry supported almost 29,000 local jobs either directly or indirectly in 2013.1 1 Source: Email correspondence with Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau, March 12, 2015 Existing Harbor Bridge to be removed Opportunity to change streets and roadways to improve Downtown Area connections and development areas Existing Harbor Bridge approach to be removed and replaced with traditional streets and blocks The planned replacement of the existing Harbor Bridge with a New Harbor Bridge creates opportunities for significant change, including new connections and development opportunities amidst several Downtown Area districts (panoramic view looking north from the Frost Bank Tower). EXHIBITA PLAN CC AUGUST 15, 2017 3 INTRODUCTION 1 Anew era ofopportunity for Corpus Christi The Downtown Area offers broader quality of life benefits to Corpus Christi as well. Besides the signature visitor destinations highlighted above, the area's beaches, parks, marina, restaurants, art centers, churches and other amenities enrich life for residents on a daily basis. As the Downtown Area gains a stronger dimension as a neighbor- hood—while continuing to be ahub of business and tourism—the added residential character will raise the value of the Downtown Area not just as a place to live, but also to work, learn and play. Downtown can offer housing options and a type of neighborhood environment not currently available in other Corpus Christi neighborhoods, helping the city attract and retain a more diverse workforce with a broad range of skills. This will further enhance quality of life and economic opportunity for the whole city. A key foundation of the DADP planning process has been an assessment of the downtown's mar- ket potential to attract new private sector invest- ment. These analyses have identified significant opportunities for downtown growth and devel- opment, provided that some key barriers can be eliminated. The DAPD outlines the opportunities and presents strategies to remove the barriers to capturing this growth. Analyses of Downtown Area's residential, office, hotel, and retail real estate market potential— conducted as part of citywide market analysis for Plan CC—shape the DADP's plan of action. New housing offers by far the strongest invest- ment opportunity. This is significant because Shoreline promenade 4 PLAN CC AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBITA growth in downtown housing has been a key driver of downtown revitalization efforts across the country, and the potential for Corpus Chris- ti to benefit from this trend is very strong. The Downtown Area already attracts existing Corpus Christi residents as well as people living outside the city (and region) who are looking to relocate to a downtown setting with high quality of life and walkable destinations. This interest comes from a wide spectrum of household income lev- els. Yet today there are relatively few good quality options for living in the Downtown Area, wheth- er at market -rate or more affordable rent levels. • There is market potential in the Downtown Area for 1,850 market -rate apartment and townhouse housing units over the next five to seven years—primarily multi -family New grocery on Chaparral Street Farmer's market at the Art Center of Corpus Christi units focused in the Marina Arts, Bayshore Neighborhood and SEA District with poten- tial for additional mixed -income housing in Washington -Coles, Uptown and North Beach. This market demand responds to the Down- town Area's unique appeal as a center of walkability, amenities and character unequaled in the region. > For those 1,850 units, market potential by unit type translates to approximately 1,000 rental lofts or apartments, 500 for -sale lofts or apartments, and 400 for -sale townhous- es. These unit types are especially suited to reinforcing a walkable, active character in the Downtown Area; no other part of the city would attract such a strong concentration of multi -family and attached units. > Additional demand for single-family de- tached ownership units may also be present; approximately 20% of households interested in living in the Downtown Area would prefer a single-family unit. Single-family units do not offer sufficient economic value or benefits to walkability to be appropriate in much of the Downtown Area. However, those portions of the area where single-family detached dwellings are traditionally present would be appropriate places to develop new single-family detached ownership housing on compact parcels. These areas principally include portions of Uptown west of Staples and south of Agnes, Washington -Coles west of Staples, and northern portions of North Beach. > Younger singles and couples (millennia's) make up the primary target markets to fill that new housing (68%), with empty nest- ers and retirees (19%), and traditional and non-traditional families (13%) comprising i3 INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunity for Corpus Christi Vj IMAGE SOURCE:CORPUSCHRISTI CALLER TIMES ., The 2017Fiesta de la Flor attracted 55,000 people to the SEA District, with an estimated economic impact of $15 million. the rest. Total Downtown Area population growth over 15-20 years could exceed 8,000 people, assuming each household contains an average of approximately 1.5 people. > This market potential does not always equate to immediate development feasibili- ty. As in many downtowns, public incentive policies will be needed to catalyze new real estate development, providing near-term financial assistance that unlocks strong longer-term returns to the city in terms of tax revenue, Downtown Area vitality and attraction of additional private investment. • Downtown office growth has more modest prospects, as regional office growth is project- ed mainly in administrative and support indus- tries that are not typically downtown tenants. Up to 100,000 square feet of Downtown office demand in the next 10 years is antici- EXHIBIT A c pated, and could be accommodated by existing vacant space. Downtown's emergence as a live- ly residential neighborhood will, however, help stimulate Downtown Area business growth by creating a more active, appealing and ameni- ty -rich setting for business, and attracting and retaining valuable workforce. • The hotel economy in Corpus Christi is healthy, particularly in the Downtown Area where tourism and destination visitors are dominant markets. The market has grown by 2.4% per year in the last 10 years. Market anal- ysis conducted in 2015 indicated healthy de- mand for hotel rooms in the Downtown Area. This outlook was validated by subsequent development proposals for nearly 500 rooms in five new hotels in the Downtown Area, split between the SEA District and Bayshore Neigh- borhood. Demand for additional hotel rooms 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 1 5 DR T INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunityfor Corpus Christi North Beach North Beach Gateway besides these proposed projects is not antic- ipated in the near term. However, additional hotel development proposals in the Downtown Area should be welcomed if market demand for them can be demonstrated. A convention hotel supporting the American Bank Center is desired as a strategic resource to expand the visitor economy. • Downtown Area retail and entertainment offerings have a distinct and deepening market niche. While shopping in Corpus Christi is pri- marily driven by areas outside the downtown, such as the South Padre Island Drive (SH 358) and other auto -oriented locations, the Down- town Area offers Corpus Christi's strongest concentration of dining and nightlife des- tinations. Numerous choices for live music and unique, locally -owned venues set the Down- town Area apart as a destination for locals and visitors alike. Growth opportunities include: > Small (100 -person) and mid-sized (1,000 -person) live music venues; > Nightlife with an added "twist" such as bowl- ing, dueling pianos or an arcade; > Destination dining, especially restaurants that are regionally -based or have just one Corpus Christi location; and > Mobile retail, such as food trucks • A growing residential population will also help diversify Downtown Area retail to include new choices—appealing to residential, worker and visitor markets alike—such as a drugstore, limited -assortment grocer, family restaurant/ diner, discount variety store, coffee house, and other specialized services. There is also untapped market potential for several poten- tial destinations that could serve as valuable daytime anchors: an outdoor outfitter, a fami- ly -themed amusement destination (in addition to Hurricane Alley Waterpark), and an art supply store (if Texas A&M -Corpus Christi's Master of Fine Arts program locates down- town; see below). • Relocating the Master of Fine Arts program of Texas A&M -Corpus Christi downtown represents another valuable development or tenanting opportunity. This graduate -level program would be particularly well suited to a downtown location because faculty and students can connect with the established arts AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBITA community there, downtown offers students an attractive location for studying and living, and the program operates independently ofthe main campus. The university has explored potential to place the arts program downtown in reno- vated or leased space in the past, but has not yet acted on this goal due to cost challenges. A collaborative effort between the university, city and/or downtown property owners to overcome these challenges is encouraged, as the program's presence downtown would yield value not only to for the university and its students, but also for downtown as an additional arts partner and daytime center of activity. Downtown investment in development, programs and infrastructure is happening at its highest level in decades and sets the stage for a substantially higher level of investment capitalizing on the mar- ket opportunities described above. Demonstrating Corpus Christi's Downtown Area housing market potential, ongoing or recently completed down- town housing development has added 615 new market -rate units, between the Cosmopolitan, Atlantic Lofts, Nueces Lofts, Bay Vista, and Bay Vista Pointe. Other initiatives in the Downtown Area that reflect market interest include new boat slips at the marina, Bayfront Inn redevelopment and a new hotel on Shoreline Boulevard, addition- al hotel development planned in the SEA district, the new Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority transportation center in Uptown, Texas State Aquarium's $60 million expansion in North Beach, and community enthusiasm for park im- provements along the former Shoreline Boulevard right-of-way and Sherrill and McCaughan Parks. THE DADP ALIGNS CLOSELY WITH CORPUS CHRISTI'S CITYWIDE PLAN The Downtown Area Development Plan (DADP) was created in parallel with the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan for all of Corpus Christi, so that both plans, and the com- munity conversations that informed them, shared a common base of information, ideas, priorities and initiatives. The table at right highlights key elements of the Plan CC Vision in the left column, and how the DADP supports these in the right column. DR INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunity for Corpus Christi Our broadly diversified economy provides opportunity for all. Modernized city services and systems support growth and vitality in all parts of the city. High-quality, safe, connected, and diverse neighborhoods provide a variety of living choices. Stewardship of our natural heritage and green -space networks strengthens our unique character and supports resilience. Supporting Downtown Area business growth with more attractive, walkable settings for tourism, dining, office -inclined industries, and other business activities. Helping attract and retain skilled workforce by substantially expanding the number and variety of Downtown Area housing options—featuring qualities and amenities not available in other portions of the City. • Identifying priority infrastructure investments that can be cost- effectively paced with market-driven real estate development. • Applying updated TIRZ incentive policy to help fund infrastructure investments. Reconnecting districts and opening up attractive development sites, by restoring the street grid after removal of the old Harbor Bridge from the SEA District and North Beach. Getting more out of existing streets and parking through new man- agement partnerships and better public information. Leveraging market opportunity for downtown housing and supportive retail, through cost-effective TIRZ #3 and other development incentives. • Applying building design guidelines to enhancing the quality of properties and public spaces, putting more doors, windows, people and plantings people on the streets. • Creating a more complete set of quality transportation choices— emphasizing walkable sidewalks, safe bike routes, convenient bus services, and improved options for driving routes and parking—to connect the Downtown Area better with other parts of Corpus Christi. EXHIBITA Improving access to, and appreciation of, the bayfront and destina- tion parks by filling gaps in the Downtown Area's remarkable park and pathway network Encouraging sustainable building design and preservation techniques through downtown area development incentives. PLAN C _' AUGUST 15, 2017 7 DR T INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunityfor Corpus Christi DOWNTOWN VISION THEMES Five major themes, responding to priority goals voiced by community members, guide Downtown Area Development Plan initiatives: z= a wen de- eiopment. The established Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone [TIRZJ is a powerful and underutilized tool that can make new development possible by funding street and utility improvements and short-term tax rebates using the new tax revenue it creates. This well -conceived pro- gram can help a wide variety of development projects take advantage of the strong market interest in living in and around Downtown. Create more noush While much of the demand for downtown liv- ing can be accommodated by the private de- velopment industry, assisted in some cases by the TIRZ, proactive effort is needed to expand options for all residents. Households of more limited means will particularly benefit from living amidst the Downtown Area's concentra- tion of jobs, services, transportation choices, and established neighborhood communities. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBITA waterfron ark ailnetwor. The Bayfront is the Downtown Area's signa- ture amenity, enhancing quality of life for all city residents and attracting residents and visitors to the region. The Marina, Sea Wall, Shoreline Boulevard, Beachwalk, and other es- tablished parks and pathways already provide an impressive level of access to the Bayfront, but would join into a more memorable and convenient network, attracting more residents and visitors, with the completion of a few missing pieces. The New Harbor Bridge project and other planned improvements will make major progress toward this goal. Reconnect e_® Removal of the existing Harbor Bridge creates an unprecedented opportunity to reconnect Uptown, Washington -Coles, the SEA Dis- trict, Marina Arts District, and North Beach with walkable streets lined with high-quali- ty development. Attractive landscapes and architecture scaled to people will transform the experience of arrival in North Beach, the Downtown Area Bayfront and surrounding districts. ;ace to Li rte, ;earn and ia v_ An extensive array of visual and performing arts already infuses much of the Downtown Area, and will become a stronger core of Corpus Christi culture as more residents and visitors come to experience them. Corpus Christi's highly successful Marina and down- town will grow together around streets that are active day and night with people living, visiting, learning and working. D. INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunity for Corpus Christi The ideas and strategies documented here arose from a collaborative and community -driven eight-month process of stakeholder interviews, open houses, walking tours and public work- shops in which Corpus Christi citizens and business owners played a central role. Diverse stakeholders have come together to champion an inspiring revitalization of the Downtown Area, investing significant time and offering a wealth of input and insights into the actions that will un- lock the city's great potential. See the following pages for more on this community conversation. EXHIBITAI AUGUST 15, 2017 I 9 KEY INPUT FROM CITIZENS OF CORPUS CHRISTI DURING THE DADP PROCESS • The Downtown Area should be safe, vibrant, and connected • Distinctive portions of the Downtown Area should have their own character and identity • The Downtown Area should be walkable and inviting, and represent the heart of Corpus Christi • The Downtown Area Development Plan should focus on enabling real, visible investment. ••R, "m � � , " ••• , , « m, � � � • «, , ••, ,� e® me �, ,,, � �� �� p.. ��� �w ••• ,� •. « mr ., nn �� •... " •;� � � � � ,�; « « " •.. me � � � � " • ' � ,M1 �n n � , , mr � r- . me �n � � � G" '�' � i " m •�� " " � ', n " , , n a + " mm m m � me � " ,� " r + rc^ " •4 �� � " ,• �� nn nn ••••• r.: � " „ " � ^� " " � , " me � " ® " , , 111111 � "" ,Is � " " " « ,,,,, I « " a � � m, , " ���� �, " , � « " � " „ � ���� �. me � flu me me ,M1 mr � � �. m �' me W me � 'n �. + � + + « , � " � � " a " •� ...:.. � " � � � ..R. � mr ••• � ••• n n , " mrr � ni m v � " .. � « I�" .A. �, " ... ... + , " ,. " � « m " ; � ' � + « " �" m ������� � me aw me aw me � m ,� A n •• mm " " mmn " .A. n ••• �� mr � " , � .. " � uu + � n � ���� Illi ;� " ., �,'�•. ...n � m ��� +" " ,m � " ..... •,� ,' " , n � •., m .... n '�' � , " " " " � � " hin ^ , mm .. � " � •••••� m�� aM1' � �••••• �. + , ,� � � , « m, , N „ ... , ILII ...... � � ".. m, �' �' •�• �� mr � ^� " " � � � ��� • � " " � ��� " ,,, mr � � .� � " �•... " " « mr , mr '" I ... mrc m, � ,m , ^« 'n m � mm m.. � me � " � � m, " ���� , a me � m �m � .r � mm � I ...il � � ..A ^� � � IPtl � me :. � n m �, � � « � � " , , " � " � , mr " « mr " ••• ,mr ,n , mi �" p. � ... m, , nin .A .i." � me � "'� nm "6 me � � " � � � , � , m •.. , �" �, �� , �••••• mr nm , �•,� �•• II � aM1' •••••• � � « + + 'm , mmn �" uu " � me + " � � � � " � � III , u � , " °� m, , � � , � .. jinni n •... " � .... � � ••n mrc � m.. , n me ••M1 •� m �R " � " , � + � x n � � �' " mm '. ••••• ��� � .. � �•.. �• ••••• ••�• „ � aw « '��� me uu ••••• + ... � ..� � � �, •... •... � m, � me •. � � "" � aM1' m, ���. � ...il mr m, " � � , , « uu �� + " Iiia. � n •... ••. � ' � � ... � � � � • me ••••• 'n , m � ,� x ,� a �. � ,",••� •• �d�r � m, � � � � n n � � i � � " " , « •. ���� �, � me n .. m + � � •���� � " � � � ,� , � � " � � ,� ,,,,, ,� ,M1 � " m � � � � � me m, n � ���� 'n " ... + ...r .... � •••••• mmn " " me it • � " � .. � � i��• .� � ...... '+ mr .A �... � " x � „ ° �••••• � I ••••• .,.il � .. , •••• " ,� � a � " ••••• �.. � uu n •••• " a � noir « �, ,M1 � " � nm , , , , " .... m � � me � � ® n � � me me m, � ,M1 � n � « + " .. � �n ni m � m.n me 12 I PLAN CC TAKING INITIATIVE TO SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITY The Corpus Christi community has clearly defined its goals for the Downtown Area. Ten initiatives utilize available leadership and resources to achieve those goals: REAL ESTATE REINVESTMENT Utilize TIRZ #3 to unlock mar- ket-driven development with flexible, effective options serving the different incentive needs of different projects. Take advantage of the flexibility of TIRZ funds by offering projects the incentives that suit them best. For some projects this could be a tax rebate; for others this could be street and utility improvements; and still others could use a combination of such investments. Projects seeking higher levels of incentive should demon- strate how they would be financially infeasible without it. Target tax abatement and other incentives to reinforce neighbor- hoods with new job and mixed -in- come housing development. Focus tax abate- ment along major corridors like Staples, Agnes, Laredo, and Leopard Streets where new busi- nesses and development will be most likely to succeed and have the most visible impact. Use Type A funds to support multifamily, mixed -in- come housing development serving Corpus Christi's workforce. 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBITA Proactively encourage redevelop- ment of well -located underutilized properties. Make owners of promi- nent vacant properties aware of available market interest, incentives and plan guidelines that all encourage reinvestment. The City and partners like Nueces County and the Port of Corpus Christi can set an example by selling their underutilized parcels for projects that advance DADP goals. Focus on sites that are in marketable locations, encourage private investment in nearby sites by enhancing their market position, and/or are large enough to support a significant critical mass of development. Focus infrastructure investments to maximize leverage of private sector investment. Coordinate improvements closely with known development projects—when and where necessary. Corpus Christi has invested in high-quality street and park infrastructure along Shoreline Boulevard and Chaparral Street. Before undertaking other large infrastructure projects, focus on enabling the development that has been attracted by past investments. Organize parking at district scale to increase convenience and efficien- cy. The Downtown Area needs enough conveniently located parking to satisfy market demand, but not so much that the land and funding needs of parking get in the way of high-value development. Make the most of every parking space through parking management that lets an office worker's daytime parking space serve a resident, hotel guest or concertgoer in the evening or weekend. Actively manage event traffic. During major events, some streets are clogged with traffic while others are underutilized. Provide audiences more information on access route options, and add reasons to come early and stay late, to spread out traffic over more area and time, ensuring conve- nient access for all. Transform old Harbor Bridge infrastructure to connect districts and the bay with walkable develop- ment and access. Removal of obsolete highway infrastructure will enable new streets and development to connect Uptown, Washing- ton -Coles, SEA District and Marina Arts District in ways that create more cohesive sense of place, greater market opportunity and a more connect- ed community. Install street trees, pathways and signage to create much more welcoming ap- proaches to North Beach. EXHIBITA D. INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunity for Corpus Christi GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE Intensify destination arts and retail programming. The Downtown Area is the heart of Corpus Christi's cultural and culinary scene. Raise the profile of this amenity with additional, and more visible, programming of arts, music, food, recreation and other activities serving the city and its visitors. Fill missing links in Corpus Chris- ti's signature waterfront park and path network. Take advantage of the New Harbor Bridge project and several smaller, near-term opportunities to knit together Corpus Christi's Bayfront Marina, parks and paths into a highly accessible system serving residents, workers and visitors. Create clean, safe, welcoming places. Maintain streets, parks and other public places to be consistently clean and attractive. Expand partnership between the City, property and business owners, residents, and district management to encourage good stewardship of downtown's public places. 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 1 13 INTRODUCTION 1 A new era of opportunityfor Corpus Christi WORKING TOGETHER Corpus Christi's Downtown Area is building momentum, seeing new vibrancy and activity emerging from market opportunity, existing as- sets, and the dedicated efforts of a wide variety of residents, business owners, institutions, public officials and other stakeholders. The following chapters of this document provide stakeholders and partners direction, tools and guidance to work together toward shared goals. This coordi- nation of effort around mutual goals will do the most to unlock greater levels of opportunity in Corpus Christi. • CHAOTER 2 focuses on the key priority policy initiatives and implementation strategies that will make the five vision themes tangible and visible in the Downtown Areas. The down- town plan's relationship to Plan CC vision, goals and strategies is described, as well as its roots in thoughtful past planning. 14 PLAN CC • HA; TER 3 is devoted to a detailed look at each of the six Downtown Area districts—the Marina Arts District, Bayshore Neighbor- hood, Uptown & Surrounding Neighborhoods, Washington -Coles, SEA District, and North Beach—as well as Hillcrest—through a series of reinvestment priorities. (See diagram on facing page.) • CHAOT-ER provides a set of development guidelines that will achieve high-quality, people -scaled design for buildings, streets and landscapes. • - 'T -E 5 explores key transportation topics that shape improved ways that residents and visitors can move about the city. Analysis and recommendations for IH -37, for SEA District access, for public transit, and for parking are included. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBITA Downtown Study Area and Districts aw w � Q �muwmii Z' ih r � B � o o � w /l 9:1 Ow Im hill u ofIle yG I"' , Ito w l/1"", +�r r f " 10 kyj i ° r 4 rN � ,�u NAi �; r r , r w m � WON, .a;` aw « Pad m . i i j ' 6 ul «w f i L?' a � a" � y � � z � lao k / \ 3 \ § 2 e c § c \ \ \ \ a / § \ % w j § c \ / / \ ® c § 'ab .3 2 \ b w y � � \ § / \C" / C) \ e �-)cd ' Cd / \ § § Cd ',o 2 / I ® ° \ ■ / \ \ / 0 G � ■� , w e © � E / & \ ■ , \ 4� ® ° y ° �/ ° % \ \ \ z \ \ T- ■ t ® ® \ ~ / a \ +- U) \ \ b q W / 2 \ \ / � ® '2 § � • � & � � \ \ d e c ■ - \ 2 \ j D \ / \ / 4� CDo § a ® t ? ■ » »j \ O / e § ' _ •N W � O H � O •aeZ'a r y.9 •N G F N Its ts 1 d d � C r�lMl��!J At l� w ci .ANY p V •N / ILII II III � � N W u yY)gJ AIS NII;� W y N N z O o w g A O d Z o d z +Q O LLI 4Q •Q 4Q IL 4 4Q t- '� �/�, � ti W ////////// W 'u! III � y 41(W° /iiiw�r � �f Q / ywA019 N O ,O r Ira C 00, no 0 IIID Fi Q,4° — a c 0 0 no fd p•♦ a�,,.................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm �s h p i W � V� IL .................................................................................................................................................................... ta z � �, ♦tea, � mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm IL O ♦ \ \ \ \ \ , ? ? ? ? ? r , r O cd IL o 4!F Q M O Ja' 7 CD 73 73 CD 7 yv N ra Cui co d 7 O d' 73 cm TO C O O > 73Q d F a (3) N o raL N 73 w cm O raU U U p �H = C ' i a Q F ct U �1 d O O N C = _N U O z d 6 Q Q ~ '� a� � .a� •� c ra � � d .N ra C) 7 cm �y cd a "o > E — w E c v c Ea a) cm CC 73N U tE � C C6 N C H �r O i Q O 12 c c ra ra N A /1 M cn - X i N c cm 2 ra c N ct c a F c E ra -C3c _ �j dC N — O N i C6 CN6 4(7; Q ra O cm O ra L'iVL ct N a73 te-' N .N O ra Q ra o .� C >� .� ate--+ ra LLIO U u Ol QC6 raCD d O a r�i� O CD-a 01 a a 0 0 a 0 U x a'I a z z I MI M1 H IIIIIIII�II VIII�III�IIII�IIII�III�III III111111III�IIIIIII�III III ILII II MOM HOJ > E0 31dI 3Id3H IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III III IIIIIIIIIIIII�II�III�II 3 VId IV3d9 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision REAL ESTATE REINVESTMENT KEY ELEMENTS Utilize TIRZ #3 to unlock market-driven development with flexible, effective options serving the different incentive needs of different projects. • Complete and apply a project plan for TIRZ #3 that requires applicants to demonstrate finan- cial need and consistency with DADP goals, and offers incentives in several forms that can be tailored to specific project needs. These different forms should include tax rebates of variable duration, and infrastructure including utilities and street improvements. See also TIRZ #3 funding priorities under Initiative 4. • Assess project financial need through third party professional evaluators. Establish a means for discussing project financial need and appropriate incentive packages with appli- cants in confidence (using real estate finance professionals not on city staff or the TIRZ board), and then providing recommendations to the TIRZ board for review and approval. • Develop and adopt design guidelines for new projects in TIRZ #3. Examples of such guide- lines are included in Chapter 4 of the Down- town Area Development Plan. These reason- able design standards provide investors a predictable context for project review, and help ensure continued design quality across the 20 PLAN CC TIRZ area as additional projects are developed. This helps to maintain and increase value of all properties. • Once an efficient, effective means of managing TIRZ #3 is in place, consider creating addi- tional TIRZ area in the downtown study area in places where redevelopment is especially desired. As a first priority, consider extend- ing TIRZ #3 to include the Agnes and Laredo Street corridors, to promote reinvestment along these important downtown gateways. Establishing a North Beach TIRZ should also be considered. • Suspend use of the city's established tax abate- ment program in the TIRZ #3 area, where it undermines TIRZ resources. Instead, focus the tax abatement program in areas outside TIRZ #3, where it will offer greater value (see Initiative 2). Inside TIRZ #3, TIRZ-funded tax rebates can offer equal or greater value to development projects than the tax abatement program. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A City Business Liaison, TIRZ #3 board ARC Established City operations, TIRZ revenues Alt4EFRAME Policy updates were completed within one year. Implementation ongoing / r f r, r , / 7 Y r� rr 1 r I � ,��'/�'r,� ✓, I, f r' I✓ 1 j I J� ���a �h� �G;11;� r `�f r;r'r �rr,� )�➢y�fl�` I I �,r :;y la r ,rra,.. � ' z.„;;.- rVl r'- 1, (,�il ,� ✓f �,'.,. r � ..,. r.;)j��,,: �1 F+ � ���) °l, � 11t�„ ”%y�;'�"1'i��� �f4✓''lll�'�� �m« ,�m�,r� r,�� � f/ ,e, r v� r „ (', � ,/ "';, I a„r. ;,.✓ ,.. ,.o, J alai-,� rrl,sw/;' .. /,i � � ,n:rl� , / I � r I (; Ip' ,. Jul r l:, / �;, x nra✓9rr '� J i r „l:l ,J ✓ y 1, � �,p",,r,,�I J ry '. (J., I��✓:,�, �vtar,�r,�r)�"/J , � X11 r r�%�f�`,%� r �� I(,,;f Su/G;%,��..,,r � l y',( / 1�ri�� err l��W�,�w,l �(^I .. � I t ✓1 ��'1 ,«,�u 7� , IvGl� /rl,=r moi.,,,�,J,✓r. a %%, r, � ¢ <� I'�/, 1✓ 1 / II /r ✓ 6„ I Cn �r// r x cy � " I f V /, r / Pr >,, „ri ✓ � / � �fffr I ,, /ty,C, ✓1✓/ r I Un J� k"r7, ,h�H ,;l�i % ,: � � r r I U U:: ;���. r /. al ',s'�riar >� �✓ Iv11of ,U �,. 'r1V'�I'�Y ` 'f`'A ///� f� ti/' J; / W �'�WwrloYr^,`/ �/')4r/y 9,rdG,% r!i� rNrr(,/rJ. : Vi' )/'i� �I f � �)✓I� ri �t ;J, /'Aff,. r / /�„ v r�t/,./�� ;,';..,Nln�; .. ^',.' ./ �1 Nfr... ., i r;.1 )'JYlyu I ���� lua r ��:.. ',�v /�� r n 11;,..� ,i�✓""'"+ l , it Y r r f k 11 r I , � 1 r ( ave � /✓ /�/,r F d,, I r y, W u l ioi �1 III I iiilllll II , i I , ./. /( r // � ,.. i dN"... ,,... f ,✓ /. e IIIIIIIIIIIII / n . y, ,�� / �✓(�,��'�i f r r r 1 f f�l,r �, r ,,,-, „ ,, ,,, wyr a /y I Ilfllf � ,� / , f � ✓ Ir � xyW :�IY !U1'' f)l; 1,., 7���rr,, /f,�! „r „if � / i' // ✓r%�%'11J/// { 1 r�;il11J%/,is( � �J� I„i/frW; �. ,.✓ ��' .�,. ,/ r��//�� f'r�I/,i, J,;�. VIII .... '."'���,,, J / PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision REAL ESTATE REINVESTMENT KEY ELEMENTS Target tax abatement and other incentives to reinforce neighborhoods with new jobs and mixed -income housing. • Explicitly expand tax abatement eligibility to non -convention center hotels, multi -tenant of- fice buildings, and full tax abatement levels for small businesses with as few as 20 employees. • Focus tax abatement and other non-TIRZ incentives (such as fee waivers, Type A funds, Affordable Housing Trust funds, or sale of surplus public land at reduced cost) on areas outside of TIRZ #3, to avoid redundancy or conflicts. (TIRZ #3 can independently fund tax rebates—equivalent in effect to tax abate- ment—and targeted infrastructure improve- ments to support eligible development within its boundary.) • To leverage the greater impacts possible with revitalization projects that are concentrated within compact areas, prioritize provision of tax abatement to projects in areas that are highly visible, accessible, and include a num- ber of large parcels with revitalization poten- tial and multiple owners. • Abase level of tax abatement maybe offered to any proposed project consistent with DADP goals, but higher levels of tax abatement should be offered only to applicants demon- strating financial need for it. Determine finan- cial need through the approach recommended for TIRZ #3. 22 PLAN CC • Consider applying the Downtown Area Devel- opment Plan's Design Guidelines to any project receiving tax abatement incentives. As for the TIRZ #3 area, applying design guidelines will make the project approval process more predictable, and will encourage quality develop- ment throughout the study area, help maintain and increase property value over time. • Utilize additional resources to help make possible the development, renovation and preservation of affordable/workforce housing serving a broad spectrum of incomes. Current and potential resources include: > TypeAfunds. Continue to utilize Type A funding to help create new multifamily housing options at below-market rates to address demand from households. As one potential use, consider funding property acquisition for new housing construction, in coordination with Initiative 3. > Corpus Christi Affordable Housing Trust. This new lending entity would utilize Cor- pus Christi Finance Corporation Bonds to provide low-interest financing and permit fee waivers to affordable/workforce housing development projects. > Neighborhood Empowerment Zones. These zones may be created as priority areas to offer tax abatement, fee waivers and/or other development incentives. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A -:14- ,1I;liN City manager's office, with support from EDC and Type A board Established City operations Apply updated policy within one year • Update and consolidate information on devel- opment incentives, to make the full range of policies and choices clear to developers, prop- erty owners and others interested in making investments. This should begin with a collab- orative effort between the City and the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation to update information available online, and to designate a single, consistent point of contact for comprehensive informa- tion. It should also extend to partnerships with local community organizations (such as the Uptown Neighborhood Initiative and Down- town Management District) and other entities who can help connect potential developers with these resources. Priority incentive areas outside of TIRZ #3 Priority areas for tax abatement and s other non-TIRZ incentives. As stated, in Initiative #1, consider _^ adding the Agnes and Laredo corridors into the TIRZ #3 area to increase their potential access to incentives. jft PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision REAL ESTATE REINVESTMENT KEY ELEMENTS Proactively encourage redevelopment of well -located underutilized properties. Target privately -owned property by proactive- ly contacting property and business owners to highlight market potential, incentive policies, re- cent and planned public infrastructure improve- ments, and other DADP elements that establish a more predictable and beneficial setting for investment. To the extent possible, task DMD, UNI or other locally -focused agents to conduct this outreach to maximize impact. • Target underutilized publicly -owned property by offering it for sale to private developers for development of specific projects that support DADP goals. Time these sales to when devel- opment is favorable due to market conditions, completed infrastructure improvements, or other factors. 24 PLAN CC • Encourage reinvestment in privately -owned vacant buildings or lots in prominent areas. Inform owners of real estate market analysis findings, TIRZ #3 incentives, and the predict- able framework provided this plan and its guidelines. Encourage property sale or part- nering to tap developer expertise with new market opportunities. • Establish Vacant Building Registry to assist with identifying opportunities for investment. • Where extended vacancy is anticipated, seek opportunity for temporary "pop-up" program- ming of vacant lots and storefronts, by arts or recreation organizations or other entities. • Explore opportunities to expand Heritage Park and other areas as an opportunity to improve our Convention market reach with outdoor programming space and to protect the viability of existing public facilities and investments. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A City Business Liaison, with support from DMD, UNI and/or other area improvement entities for outreach to private property owners, and from REDC, city -af- filiated housing corporations or other appropriate entities for strategic land acquisition, holding and sale. RE Operations through established funding streams for City staff and area improvement entities; property acquisition through Type A funds or other strategic economic development sources (and ultimately revolving funds through sale of parcels). TIIMEFRE Apply updated policy within 1 year. Potential Redevelopment Sites PRIORITY POLI2 INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMEN2ro 1 How to buiW the Downtown Area vision yam _«e X E 1AUGUST 15,:„7125 Amy PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision KEY ELEMENTS Support new development with infrastructure investments that are timed and located together with private investment. • Pace City investment in streets, parks, utilities, parking and other infrastructure in parallel with private development projects. See pages 48-49 for priority infrastructure invest- ments in the downtown study area. Integrate appropriate priorities and concepts developed by stakeholders such as the Downtown Man- agement District. Include North Beach water service upgrades where needed. Unless there is clear immediate need or benefit for improve- ment, begin infrastructure project investment only when private development that will benefit from the infrastructure improvement is moving forward. • Top priority use of TIRZ #3 funding should be for investments that directly enable develop- ment projects, such as gap financing, utility con- nections, sidewalk or street tree improvements, or other general street improvements/upgrades directly related to the project. Remaining TIRZ funds may then be invested in broader improvements serving the district. Larger scale infrastructure like street extensions and parking structures may require funding from other sources such as the City's biannual capital funding bonds paid through its general budget, or grants such as have been used to improve Downtown Area street lighting. • Continue to work closely with the Texas De- partment of Transportation to confirm design 26 PLAN CC and funding for new bridge, street, multi -use path and park infrastructure (associated with the New Harbor Bridge and areas where the existing Harbor Bridge and its approach streets will be removed) to ensure these in- vestments fully support DADP goals. See also Initiative 7. • Minimize any adverse impact on area prop- erties and businesses from infrastructure construction by: > Designing and phasing projects to reduce time and area of impact, > Enforcing performance criteria for contrac- tors (such as incentives for timely project completion), > Investing in "we're open for business" cam- paigns that highlight operations and access during construction through supplementary signage or other publicity, and > Involving local stakeholder organizations such as DMD, UNI, SEA District and NBCA in planning and applying these impact mitiga- tion strategies. Given the large scale of work anticipated with construction of the New Harbor Bridge and removal of the Existing Harbor Bridge, work closely with the Texas Department of Transpor- tation, its contractors, and community stake- holders to avoid adverse impacts. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A City Business Liaison, TIRZ #3 board, City Engi- neering Department, and City Planning staff with support from area stakeholder organizations such as DMD, and community organizations; and from partner agencies building and using infrastructure including the Texas Department of Transportation, CCRTA and Port of Corpus Christi. TIRZ #3 funds; City and grant -sourced capital im- provement funds; Federal and state transportation funding associated with the New Harbor Bridge, port improvements and other projects; Type A funds and/or Marina revenues for appropriate waterfront projects. Confirm conceptual design and funding of New Harbor Bridge -related projects. Build development project -related infrastructure in parallel with de- velopment. Complete a construction management plan with affected stakeholders at least two months before starting any infrastructure project. PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision Capital investments have enhanced the Downtown Area as a place to invest and visit. Recent initiatives include Shoreline Boulevard reconstruction (left), a new playground at the Corpus Christi Museum of Science & History (center), and extension of Chaparral Street streetscape and utility improvements to Taylor Street (right). See pages 48-49 for recommended future improvements. EXHIBIT A cc AUGUST 15, 2017 27 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision Organize parking at district scale to increase convenience and efficiency. KEY ELEMENTS Encourage sharing of parking spaces by uses with different demand peaks (such as daytime office worker demand and evening/weekend res- ident demand) through private agreements and/ or district parking policy. This will help mini- mize cost and land area needed for new parking, while providing new revenue to existing property owners. Contact current owners of underutilized parking to confirm potential interest in leasing spaces to others. Connect development appli- cants to these parking owners. • Over the longer term, directly and/or indirectly create public parking shared by multiple users to enable additional development projects. A direct approach would involve proactive acqui- sition of land suitable for structured parking, in areas of known development interest. An indirect approach would encourage develop- ment applicants to incorporate shared parking in their projects by committing to fund some or all of a parking structure with City capital funds, TIRZ revenues and/or other appropriate, available sources. See Development Guide- lines chapter for design guidelines explaining how structured and surface parking should be designed to enhance walkability and safety. • Design and install clear, consistent signage for parking facilities open to the public. Coor- 28 PLAN CC :.;''.s:,' dinate pricing of publicly accessible on -and off-street parking, with prime on -street spaces priced higher to encourage more frequent turnover. • Rationalize public on -street parking by estab- lishing a consistent meter policy in the Marina Arts District, Uptown, North Beach and any future areas designated for metered parking. The policy should determine appropriate meter pricing and time allowances for meters on each street, calibrated to characteristics of nearby destinations. Conduct an inventory of supply and demand to inform policy approach. Coordinate with planned relocation of some on -street parking spaces as part of Chaparral Street improvements. • Enhance the Parking Advisory Committee with additional professional parking expertise, through its membership and/or staff resources. • Reinvest parking proceeds into maintaining and building additional parking, maintaining or improving sidewalk facilities, and/or other priority needs in the parking districts. • In North Beach, ensure adequate parking for visitors to the beach and other attractions. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A 4 -1,e1.1 -11-11N CCPD Parking Control Division, with support from Parking Advisory Committee, City Business Liaison, DMD, and other appropriate stakeholders. Coordi- nate with street operations and capital projects. Fund management through current parking meter revenues. Fund new parking structures through the City's capital improvement program or other avail- able sources, with possible supplemental funding from TIRZ #3. 't1MEFRE Update Marina/Downtown/Uptown parking policy within 1 year. As developers apply for development projects, discuss with them the potential for inclu- sion of public parking on their sites, and connect them with owners of available parking. As part of Action 3, contact owners of sites suitable for poten- tial longer-term public parking structures within 2-5 years to determine interest. Off -Street Parking Concentrations in Downtown and Uptown o build the Doti DRAr own Area vision District -scale parking management can help utilize existing, underutilized structured parking spaces to support new development, and enable redevelopment of surface parking lots forhigher-valueuses 'PLAN CC PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision KEY ELEMENTS Actively manage event traffic. • Establish a working group responsible for planning and implementing traffic and parking management in the Downtown Area. Include participation by Corpus Christi Convention and Visitor's Bureau, Corpus Christi Street Operations Department, Corpus Christi Police Department, CCRTA, DMD, and other stake- holders as appropriate, under leadership of the CCCVB. Determine typical levels of manage- ment intervention needed depending on size/ attendance of events. • Consider these strategies, among others, to improve access to and from large events in the SEA District and other portions of the Down- town Area: > Provide people driving to events directions, via real time street signage and through advance notice, that disperse traffic to and from different events across multiple routes such as Port Avenue. > Use signage and consistent pricing to direct drivers to parking efficiently, preventing drivers from having to travel additional blocks seeking parking. 30 PLAN CC ..,: > Minimize pedestrian/vehicle movement conflicts near venues by temporarily limiting vehicular access within one block or other appropriate distance from venue. > For events large enough to merit park-and- ride shuttles, temporarily designate dedicat- ed lanes to serve shuttles to ensure efficient movement. Offer ferry service in addition to buses. > Provide additional programming, dining or other activities before and after major events to spread driving trips over a longer period of time and reduce traffic peaks. • Help advance supportive infrastructure investments like improved walks between Shoreline Boulevard, Chaparral and Brewster Streets, Port Avenue and area parking facili- ties, and potential vehicular traffic connection from Shoreline Boulevard at the Art Museum of South Texas to Port Avenue. • To manage event -related traffic and parking in other portions of the study area, set up similar working groups and apply successful coordina- tion techniques used in the SEA District. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A CCCVB, DMD, with support from Corpus Christi Street Operations Department, Parks & Recreation Department, and Police Department, CCRTA and other stakeholders as appropriate. Shared support from SEA District, City departments, CCRTA and/or other involved stakeholders. Establish working group within 3 months. PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision Concept for walking path and street alongside the Water Garden, connecting Shoreline Boulevard and Chaparral Street and creating additional arts and event programming opportunities. EXHIBIT A cc AUGUST 15, 2017 31 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision KEY ELEMENTS Transform old Harbor Bridge infrastructure to connect districts and the bay with walkable development and access. • Study and confirm preferred street network connections to replace the current interchange at IH 37 and the US 181/Harbor Bridge ap- proach at Broadway Street. • Rebuild IH 37 from the Crosstown Expressway to Mesquite Street as a boulevard with lower traffic speeds, a landscaped median, sidewalks east of Staples Street, and opportunity for development adjacent to the right of way. > Consider restoring the original street name for this corridor, Aubrey. > Create street connections that maximize development opportunity on adjacent sites, create safe walking and biking conditions, distribute traffic via multiple routes across a gridded street network, and have moderate maintenance costs. > Consider a roundabout at the intersection of Aubrey and Broadway as a signature gateway to Corpus Christi and the bayfront. > Consider one or more additional intersec- tions between Carancahua and Waco Streets offering improved vehicular, pedestrian and bike connections between Uptown, Wash- ington -Coles, SEA District and regional highways. > Maintain communication and keep up to date on the Harbor Bridge Project construc- tion process with Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). 32 PLAN CC • Restore east -west street connections across the old Harbor Bridge approach in the SEA Dis- trict, and create a new grade -level street along the approach, utilizing new Harbor Bridge project funding. Similarly, in North Beach, extend Timon Boulevard and cross streets where the existing bridge will be removed. De- sign streets to be safe and inviting for walking. Discuss new street alignment and design with area property owners to ensure new streets support development opportunity. • Ensure convenient use of multiple access routes to the SEA District, including Port Avenue and the potential future Staples Street extension to Fitzgerald, as well as Broadway and existing streets to the east of the current bridge. • Ensure the project enhances Downtown and Uptown connections at key intersections along I-37 between Port Avenue and Shoreline Boulevard, and via Agnes and Laredo Streets. Ensure the project enhances North Beach access with convenient, attractive access at Beach Avenue connecting to Surfside and Timon Boulevards. • Ensure that all major highway approaches have programmable signage that can be used to provide access instructions for events and tourist destinations. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A City Planning & ESI Department, City Engineering Department, with support from TxDOT New Harbor Bridge funding for specific projects. Supplemental city capital funding for areas beyond the scope of the Harbor Bridge project. Timed with the Harbor Bridge Project. Transforming obsolete Harbor Bridge approach highways into walkable city streets DRA-T PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision CC 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 33 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE KEY ELEMENTS Intensify destination arts and retail programming. • Develop and apply a coordinated approach to Downtown and Marina branding, building on branding efforts by the DMD and Corpus Christi Marina. • Coordinate branding and marketing efforts to visitors among the DMD, Marina, SEA District, CCCVB, American Bank Center, Texas State Aquarium, USS Lexington, hotels and other visitor industry stakeholders • Add regular dining, recreation and/or other destination activities along Shoreline Boule- vard to highlight and expand synergies be- tween the Marina, Bayfront, Downtown and adjacent areas. Enable expansion of the Art Center of Corpus Christi's restaurant/cafe space with outdoor dining as part of transfor- mation of former Shoreline Boulevard right of way into park space. Program Shoreline Boulevard median space near Lawrence and/ or Peoples Street with dining, starting with mobile vendors and exploring potential for more permanent restaurant facilities. Require building development and major renovation 34 PLAN CC ..,: projects in this area to include active ground floor uses facing Shoreline Boulevard, prefera- bly including restaurants or shopping. • Create a working inventory of available downtown retail space to assist marketing to potential retail business tenants. To the extent possible, focus retail uses within one block of Chaparral Street to create synergy. • Create a stronger presence of the arts along or within one block of Chaparral Street. Replace prominent vacancies with galleries, studio space and/or other arts -related programming. Install public art (preferably on a rotating basis) along improved sections of Chaparral, La Retama Park and/or other key public spac- es. Engage the Art Gallery of Corpus Christi, TAMU Department of Art, Art Museum of South Texas, gallery owners and/or other arts stakeholders in programming and publicity. • Relocate graduate programs in the Department of Art of Texas A&M University Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC) to Downtown. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A DMD and Corpus Christi Marina for Downtown/Ma- rina branding and marketing; CCCVB with support from other stakeholders noted above for broader branding and marketing; DMD, Marina and Art Center for Shoreline Boulevard programming; DMD, Art Center and other arts organizations and stake- holders for arts programming; Corpus Christi City Council, TAMU-CC and DMD for downtown graduate arts facility. DMD funding from public improvement district and City; contributions from stakeholder organizations; potential TIRZ #3 funding; TAMU-CC. Update branding and marketing for the Downtown/ Marina and broader Downtown Area by end of 2017. Expand Shoreline Boulevard programming during summer 2018; add more permanent dining opportu- nity by 2019. Fill at least five vacant downtown retail spaces by end of 2019. Open downtown TAMU-CC graduate arts facility within 5 years. wk :-y- �� £ t «l�ti Now£AREA_ PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE KEY ELEMENTS Fill missing links in Corpus Christi's signature waterfront park and path network. • Complete reconstruction of the Marina's boat slips south of Coopers Alley. • Complete design and construction of Shoreline Boulevard park improvements between Fur- man Avenue and Coopers Alley, using funding previously dedicated. • Design, fund and implement Phase II Shore- line Boulevard walkability and streetscape improvements between I-37 and Lawrence Street. Add crosswalks across Shoreline Boule- vard at any cross streets where they are absent, such as Schatzell, People's (north side), Starr, Taylor and Twigg Streets. Include curb bump - outs, signage or other devices to promote traffic speeds at or below 25 mph. • Complete design and construction of North Shoreline Boulevard promenade from the Texas State Aquarium ferry dock to Bridge- port Avenue and the Beachwalk, using funding previously dedicated. • Connect the new Harbor Bridge multi -use path to neighborhoods and the bay with a new multi -use path extending west to Hillcrest, East to Shoreline Boulevard via Washing- ton -Coles and the SEA District, and south to Uptown. Include the Solomon Coles Recre- ation center and historic Old Bayview Ceme- tery as part of the route. 36 PLAN CC • Connect the new Harbor Bridge multi -use path to North Beach and the bay with a new multi- use path extending along Beach Avenue to the Beachwalk, and along Timon and Surfside Boulevard to the Texas State Aquarium ferry dock. • Build the planned birding park in North Beach north of Beach Avenue, utilizing new Harbor Bridge required wetlands mitigation. • Connect Uptown to the bay with improved pedestrian lighting and walks along Leopard, Peoples and Lawrence Streets, Cooper's Alley, and along Park Avenue from South Bluff Park to McGee Beach. Include bike infrastructure as prescribed in the adopted Bicycle Mobility Plan. Include sidewalk, crosswalk and acces- sible ramp improvements at the bluff along Broadway to enhance Uptown -Downtown connections. • Explore opportunities for pedestrian -only corridors throughout the Downtown planning district. • Recruit ferry service provider or similar service with stops at the SEA District (at Ortiz Center dock) and increased service frequency (30 minutes) by replacing the previous model of a single ferry with multiple smaller boats. Explore private and public-private models. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A -:14 ,1I; I City Planning & ESI Department, Engineering Ser- vices Department, Parks & Recreation Department, CCRTA bus service Dedicated and future capital project allocations; CCRTA for bus service, TxDOT mitigation require- ments Tt1MEFRE Complete Shoreline Boulevard crosswalk improve- ments,Leopard/Peoples Street lighting improve- ments and marina boat slips within 3 years. Com- plete park and path improvements along Shoreline Boulevard and Park Ave. within 4 years. Complete North Beach birding park and Timon/Surfside path within 5 years. Complete new Harbor bridge path connections in conjunction with the bridge comple- tion. • Inaugurate a Bayfront shuttle service along the Shoreline Boulevard corridor between the SEA District and downtown. Brand the service differently from standard public transporta- tion services, and proactively market service to visitors (as well as the Corpus Christi commu- nity). • Consider opportunity to connect waterfront paths to Westside neighborhoods with multi- use trails along former rail corridors. Bayfront Park & Path Network PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision EXHIBIT A PL,,N CC 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 1 37 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision GREAT PLACES FOR PEOPLE KEY ELEMENTS Create clean, safe, welcoming places. • Continue and expand the highly successful public/private partnership and volunteer efforts led by the Downtown Management District (DMD) promoting cleanliness, safety, and a welcoming environment in the Marina Arts District. These efforts include presence of uniformed "Clean Team" staff who perform dual roles: 1) maintaining downtown public places, and 2) serving as tourism ambassadors providing people information and assistance. They also include periodic volunteer events for cleaning, painting and other maintenance of public streets and parks. • Consider applying similar initiatives in other portions of the Downtown Area. • Continue the DMD's partnership with the City to manage the bike patrol program, which con- tracts off-duty police officers to ride downtown streets, providing additional security. • Encourage regular use of parks, include the recently rebuilt park spaces at La Retama Park and along Shoreline Boulevard, through 38 PLAN CC ..,: regular maintenance. Maintain facilities sup- porting daily use, and program periodic events, to leverage the parks' amenity value and to promote safety. • Address issues associated with public nui- sance complaints and transient populations. This includes ongoing efforts by the DMD, and other stakeholders as applicable, to communi- cate with social service providers. • Continue the mural painting programs that have been applied in the Marina Arts Dis- trict and SEA District for buildings as well as electrical boxes and other infrastructure. Engage local arts and business organizations to provide artwork that celebrates distinctive qualities of the Downtown Area. • In coordination with Initiative 8, develop a plan for signature architectural lighting and signage in the Marina Arts District and/or other areas. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A DMD, other area service organizations, City Busi- ness Liaison, Parks & Recreation Department, Police Department. City and private -sector funding. Ongoing. PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision Downtown Management District staff and volunteers help maintain curb markings. New murals include one covering the Corpus Christi Caller Times building. EXHIBIT A P_A cc AUGUST 15, 2017 39 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision DOWNTOWN AREA FRAMEWORK: BAYFRONT PARK & TRAIL NETWORK This comprehensive park and recreation trail system links the waterfront, public parks, neighborhoods, and Downtown Area districts of Corpus Christi through new multi -use paths and walkable, bikable recreation loops. A newly marked path along Shoreline Boulevard and the waterfront connects to interior paths at Park Avenue, Peo- ples Street, I-37 (transformed into a green Boulevard after the Harbor Bridge relocation) and Port Street. The trail network extends to North Beach via a reinstated and expanded water ferry service from the marina and SEA District, connecting to the existing North Beach "beachwalk" and new pathways on Beach Avenue, Surfside and Timon, and along the proposed Harbor Bridge. The path from the new Harbor Bridge would link through the Hillcrest and Washington -Coles neighborhoods connecting both to the SEA District and the bay. The recreation trail would be comprised of wider sidewalks, dedicated bike lanes, and/or shared bike lanes along existing streets, with beach trails and bridge treat- ments to complete the network. 40 PLAN CC "?': '.'`. AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A 3 PRIORITY POY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMmemo 1 How to buie the Downtown Area vision .ws 3,33333: WWI EXHIBIT A.4.JPLAN CC 1AUGUST ,;.:„7141 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision DOWNTOWN AREA FRAMEWORK: POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT SITES Significant development opportunities exist in Corpus Christi based on an analysis of publicly- and privately -owned land parcels that appear vacant or underutilized. Cri- teria for noting these parcels—color coded according to ownership by the Port, TxDOT, City, or County—include large, open surface parking lots, vacant or underperforming buildings where redevelopment value exceeds current value, and reclaimed land that will be made available with the relocation of the Harbor Bridge. The diagram does not suggest a proposal for specific development on specific sites. Instead it is meant to focus discussion on the possibility of redeveloping key parcels through public/private partnerships, that would have significant positive impacts on their related districts and neighborhoods. Note that the majority of City owned sites are located in the SEA District, while privately owned sites are distributed throughout the Downtown Area districts. 42 PLAN CC ..,: AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A m PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision DOWNTOWN AREA FRAMEWORK: STREET CHARACTER This diagram highlights the network of streets of different types that serve the Down- town, SEA District, Bayshore Neighborhood, and Uptown and surrounding neighbor- hoods. Taken together, this street character framework defines appropriate design approaches for development on each type of street. Chaparral Street between William and Taylor is logically a primary walking street and priority retail location given its recent streetscape improvement program. This model could also be followed on Leopard Street between Broadway and Tancahua and eventually in the SEA District as well on Chaparral between Fitzgerald and Port Street. Shoreline Boulevard and Broadway Street are emphasized as primary walking streets, while Water and Mesquite Streets are de- noted as flexible access streets, meaning they primarily serve a transportation function although integration of commercial and/or residential uses is possible. Gateway Streets and Boulevards complete the network and feature additional attention to landscape and pedestrian facilities, combined with convenient vehicle access. 44 PLAN CC "?',.,: AUGUST 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A ORA. g PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown Area vision to F- 0 U U0 • H Q ng O r3.3 o ,4- ._, 'y,_, O ra . d 0 O �' N ' 0 g Ud 0 0 5 0 . y U a' 4-1 w ra moi 0 5 o ;-::- g �U. O +�-� O + 0 E O NN U > z g a) O2 1 pq 0 O u 0 G OCD W P! CD U U H cd W W Cg' 4- CC N a E °�' tn 4 2:, F • s" in Ell OQ+ H N U 5 cd ct �• �� �0 ct z p 0 .2 u A H . to o u, pm F O re uuu a 0 1-14 0 U„. O E 0 E 0 c g P� rd 0 - g g 0 U O U UZ cct O 0 Ct 4i CC g to o E g , . cd N U V) }F� Ct CL) 0 .,v F.U., O cC 4-i ��” i/� c_)zn b.0 7.1 g, O Cd 0 U •dU a ^o ct � 0 U 0 H H H0' a a U Fes-, R �" +' ct p t ct I ^oO x 0 cFd cd O a ca ct cu rn E a U gto 0 x o ties these locations Ti 0 O 0 create a connected and clear ne n 0 CC 111111111111111 1111 • 1111 Now 0 0 O 0 0 4-i 0 CC CC 11111,11 EXHIBITA u u 1 a. l9 eY PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown A z 0 z W uJ W J a X z m W f z 4 J IIIIIIIIIIIII a III�IIIIIII � 61 F O ro 0 ll11111111111111 0J 01 0 W O N E Oo 0 W CL EJ a1 O 2 01 W i W H - J O d 2 a 0113 o • o 20 a of c g OJ 'an) 0 a E 2 N E O O E 0 a �iiuul 01 C O = r0 0 m d N 0 E O O E d e Streetscape improvements li(fi�l _> N m 0 u L• n C (9)- ,(72 C O V • O u - > — a ° oLn O O 0_ CM .E 2 d T � 0J 0 ,-r.7; I01 3• ro _ c 2 T O - O -o - Q O -o ,0 ,0 O 0 O O O a 0) a I�IIII� CL 01 J a `1'3 0 O v O � am 0 � i) n vo 1 O a 0 II 11 ro 0 O U H m IIUI!il� 11111111111111 III Dip 11111111 1;000000000111 001 o - r0 E O �m O w II a 0) 0w aO O v N 00 = O0 d aS �m j, U 0I -; C O 2 L c o 2 m O _ Q O X 70 O O 0 a - 3O O • O1 0 01_ O N Q O in Li 12mCC N 01 LE 0 w 0 0 N O u C O o ° � O X � O O O U SII~ IIIIIIII • I Illitoppoppot 11 a 1. 011110,1" 011,,,,,, , 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111Poi 11111111111111111 W 11111111 1111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 il 11111111111111111111111111 HVIoppoppoppoppoi 0 To e OE O O N N v �z - Y O C O Y o E q =- u1 E a N vol Y V N E a° U N > 0 07O N a p � m m -2 OJ L O a Lc ltd g O L N Y 2 O E 2 0 C w 01 (0 w O .S O - > J O J (0 0 > d 0 N 3 Y -O -O a > • 0 O m > Y 0 0 > 01 O O N ▪ O O O 1111111111111111111111 0_ O o O U I 0 O LZ O O 0 > O m a0 O L aN N 0 O in 1l�ll� 0) coO O -o E O SO 0) 0 >m U • N r6 � u ro ro111 ll Wl J 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 00000000000000.. — C7 Z_ 0 O 1 O L O c -0 v PE X 00 v av O � N � cull a docks. COMPLETED N 0 N N 0 0 'Cr.) u _0'07) U � E > O Q > n O �c o u _o O • (00 EU LE U Y 1 O m N.� ✓ Y V • 6 O - U d m P1111111111 '11 O C7 u u 1 H 00 PRIORITY POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 How to build the Downtown A 0 0 0 0 z 0 J a z m W F z J 00 uum y F EXHIBITA u u 1 IL 111.'1'1'1 INTRODUCTION he District Framework and Reinvestment Priorities chapter begins with an overview of the Down- town Area districts, highlighting their unique qualities alongside opportunities for targeted reinvest- ment. The analysis of market-based development potential described in Chapter 1 sets the foundation for these recommendations, as do recent infrastructure initiatives taking place in the Downtown Area—most importantly the Harbor Bridge relocation, recent Chaparral streetscape implementation, and Shoreline Boule- vard reconfiguration. EXHIBIT A zect Corpus Ch 0 0 0 uj W F 0 0. 0. 1- Z W 1- W Z W 0 Z 0 W m EL. it- uu O ,5ii, 1142 1151 111111111111 CLO m, VIiW uoti,fiO, CLO ob000 1¢29 �nx OoolO 11 Co Co IMtim�r��� , N q p •N H00fil V •O n gni D1�e In. N C.Clo W 11110 0410.0101011. QJ0000 ti O oko ➢I�inimiou 0 moo mI x i•Q lr�rw m„4ti ,m�I�umnuMO 111,1110, III 111111111111 3E1111,1111 10, 11011111111 X9,,,,14 11111 11111111111111 000000 )J 0000 0000 'N tao N C 0000 ti •Iv � o � "Beach and attractions" yoloolooloolol000lo waroprp IV 00/ ii aF a� 0 O biD "0 0 O 0 O •0 N 5 long-term improvements. 1111111111H 0 11110111011111101 , EXHIBITA and connect C DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted p7-iorities for a v "101011101111,111100)610. AIN if IN 101 ffilf00,101011411f.flill I 010 lorammnammtem.enleMminfreMinarlarrnli 7,1 a.. co 1' V ■ 1' Leztz CCS O N • N m 0 a) a) U a) a) cd a) a) a) -02 a) cd a) a) cd a) 0 cd a) 0 a) i" 0 O a) ti a) a) 5 cd cd 0 O a) cd cd U a) F -I cd U 0 O 0 O rt F -I 0 O U 0 O Cd 0 0 a) -02 rd O Pa a) O a) a) a) 0 O a) a) -05 a) a) O cd a) O -05 a) F -I cd E 0 a) 0 Cd Cd U CdbbA cd a) Cd g v) • c Cd 0 o "O Q a) cid c cd rt cd O a) H O a) a) .ti rt • g +� N g rU- �' F -I O c� O c 0 cd 0 0 bA 0 0 0 a) rci a) U a) 0 U a) a) a) a) -02 a) -020 a) a) cd 0 O 0 O a) a) 0 O Pa cd a) a) aa)) a) a) U U 'O a) a) f -I 0 'O .ew d 0 0 cd O able environment is a core asset. This character can be reinforced by encouraging EXHIBITA 1 AUGUST 15, 2017 cCr DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete 0 01 1am 4.1 II C (j Lsa "Lt Ls Vs M e E tz.•i i 00000111,05001150555111.0101110115111.1 11 W i, 9yJl fir 101 1111111111111111111111111111111 OA wu ci, cd 7:5 42 a) 0 oa� a� 0 o' on 0 O cd o � coi A cd ° 0 o .� ° o a) ° °° 10 g °' 0aai on 'on 'on 0 0 •0 cd 0 (4) g c.9 v2 fir" O ., 5 -0 o . +� .0.0 Q 3 U g a v2 .0 -0 Ii;llllllllluuuuuuumr' residents and visitors alike. 4 td d t U � tt CZ'.t1 rg t0 g 44d o 44 g 0 0 g 0 '¢ x d t a O : x y M. t3) Za d NMa a O 'Y •N 11,„D lii w ., 1111, zg d v111 NQ is bA - 0 .~ CD U2 Z a� c 144 ;CDCD CDCD cd s. W in 0 0 o a.) +� A g cd Z ° o i. E I u 1111111116,, IIIIIU j((((j111 I11.( IdiIIl1111IIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPuuu � �`11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIouuliiiq, °, III511111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,, Illiiiiiiiii 0111iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilf ' 1luuuiiiuuu1111 tion on available sites. This recommendation '011100. „11111111111,1: 11 I `O ,5 �c 0 o m 7i ° c . 0 o › ai o ° W c w o .. o t (21 Q a; 0 ta 0 o 0 0 a 02 • 0i Ti g 0 N4- c-zi .� - p 1-1 o M1 W y 000 ¢' t ° o m 4m N N ., ? c EXHIBITA zect Corpus Ch DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora co cht a) N o .� 7:15 rn t (S r-9 b A rn N cd rn a) Cd U o O ,g a, 0 0 :'"i Lt a s1 best established cluster of destination retail and -0 0 -0 'N a a) a� o o ., 45 E 0„�,- 2 U 2 N0 to N: N 0 U E + 0 HLt CC 49 ›CL) U g g E .� •� a •N U 0 i/i N O 'O a) a) a)ct 5 E •N F -i O 0 O N, P., "O ao CI a) c ^ g Future residents will in turn increase demand for dh iIIJurnII I1qi WYEi ,i �r.111111111111111 . hwi 111111111111111111111111111 fir III 1111a111�1(Il it 11111 H»)111)01001 1! • ui H O 5o a)b , F.�b.13cC crh ., 4--� rUi) cC P O UCD CD a) c c c a.) O O +' , o ren +-� a) G 1 O O o -X ¢ cd ON' ON� � + U rcs N Cto E d o +�O 0 ° OU ^” O ZtCt o Q by O ; = N i O =.O 4- 0 ) U OO C OQoN a) NW� a -0N°) t is ^o+, a) g cd g a Q U b2, tOOA v -0 g WQ E +., bA u) Z +' O O1 o d W D r LL No O 'opo U �f mo� C N ° .+ �" a Oa'g a) :r V O U Df =r O '>C m co d Q O - ct ' ct ,--i Q U .. , cd N, DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete a) a) 1 ..O a) o a) grl • rz • (1) • "0 ,..0 cd (1) • U (1) • rn cn 0 1013 O O 5, .ti cd zrz • 5 al Pa 5 a)"ci0 °' C6 � O N ¢ N 0ow f, Q 4 " 0 ' O w "0 O 4 cd • cn �, W0 0 n 0 c • � Q '' _0 0 0 .� O m•5, ' O Z Q -w district's established role in tourism and emerg- a) _-) boD 0 0 0 a) 0 U 0 entertainment presence. a) 0 The Marina Arts District is well known for its -45 • 0 0 O 00 O 0 O a) a) 0 O 0 U a) 0 0 Pa a) 0 T2 0 0 cd a) 0 0 O cd i-, 0 0 0 0 Av 0 U 0 0 a) a) a) a) 0 a) U a) a) 0 0 0 a) 0 U a) 0 N 0 0 O U a) a) zrz 0 a) U 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 O 0 0 Ion, ;;p, fYIllYllllllp 4v`Ir� P (N10.01, 101 iUIIIVImVI!ipW 1. lbo�ll� '1IiiI iiii , ..,.111 I qq IIY„I�ifIN1,1dI ,' pyo iw��l+ p1 ,�VI� feu, 1 A 11111,11,1001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1,1,111,111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 A 111.1.,1 r ,� 11 1 INNu 1 1111)( M1 y1m Um iii 11111111r 1,, -16 EXHIBITA zect Corpus Ch DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora U 0 0 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U bA � 5 O 411 N P N 0 O O U OU cd 0 • pq FO O O V) N : N bn o O 0 0 a) U 0 0 U 'op U a) U bA -02 g cd c 50) amidst the bal 0 CC U 0 0 U 0 O U U ctX E U a U N O 0.00 O U 0 +a 5 U "CI • CCC U town will calm d bike routes in Do U • i/i U "O CSC '0 0 • b�A � to cd c0 CD cd N U U) cr3 t4-1 CC V) cog .moi "'O ca a' E 0 a' 0 -45 een the Art Center o g �U U g CSC U g N CL) U O 0 CL)"O M N "' CC u, U bA C U 4 "O ,0 N N 0.) o 0 0 "0 0 Q 'oD OAct Ct CC cd .2 V U d a) g • U CC "C/• CSC U bA O g "1721 CC O O o U .ti CCcwt CCC 'OD CC O N CC EXHIBITA DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete Z I,rl taxc I' uluY a 44, Q 000,i• ruuuuuuuuuuuuiiiuumuuuuuuuuul rlU 1 0°;00000000000000000000000000,'/(: 00.W?°' 0c. nuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiuuuuuum 0 000000;0 1 11 Y 4y M 041111 � r Illi ^ :• X11111111111111111111111111111111111111""l1.11, flu° II1 II ,11,1111111111j'''„.1.1111111111111'''', 1I11111111111111111111111111111 )IIIllliillllllllllll111111111111111111111 . �I�IIIIIIIIPuumuuufuliiiouuii'Y01"d {IIIIIIIIIIIIII uulllmlhduuuuumuuuuuuu. 401,m i{I 6 ry lumll 'IIAIIIIm 11111141 uom y„ o„i'luId :0040 tl rv�l ,20000 000000 @� "" ho1pR'Gm�pl11 tomo rvry w I,", , I0 10, 4 IIIkI 0,000°,001(0,°0°000000000000, 'dlllllllllllllllllllj IU "' 1 II0000 11uiuiuuuuuuiiil` NIµ1,,11111 N,ly1d ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIuuuuuuuilulYlll SII 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111:'aI uMimlllhll lG_ i11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111ppp ,,,e11111111111111 .1111.. II�IY 141. Q� mum. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 U1 III111IIIIIIUIIIIIuuluullulluuuluuuululuuluul 9fVl10p11l 0 ul 191, "MlrlA"4 nlpfl 111101111,1,1,1411 00,0 1111111111111111111111 olooloolool II 11111. Iooloolooloo 0000110000000i 11110000000000n iJl I�,I 0 (0 EXHIBITA for a vibrant and connect Cor DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted ; °'+ . E E cn ��+ U Ect Q o U F�� p 0 ,tom.; a) H H U • 'DA .'- co H °) 0 ct u, a) a ° 0 4 ra N c 5.� U U za "O p)E PA z% 4 . o ui ° 5. r~ d O O o a) a v) ° c°�i ^° 10 a ° Cit n ct g d G) a) 0 g ra ^° arR g 7d 0., g a ct ,0 a n 5 ° O t .,0 4- U ,J a) 4 4 +9 CD .11t E N a) `) 0 oA a giii U , g+ U ° 0 Q Q -F, .4 > A• 0 Ct ° yg E•a N A Ca . R W O C:1 Cd +.z �- 0 Ca + v2 0 --'o-0t o o o ani F. ct V0 . ° ° F.' .0 cd E Cd +- 0 0 Z Cd g ° . "c2 Cd U a) r: ° 0 c� �i O QQ •0 � 0 a a z F While there should be current focus on lever - g 0 cC 0 O O N interior streets N N g • • oA 0 Cd o `oA S- O (.79 U a) a) 0 ° 1 U wwn ""!II(iiuuumglll+++ 11 '11"(1)11:1(111111"11,1!!!!!!!„))))),,,.!„,„.„,„ IIIIIIIIIIIIV Y,16888(1111111111111111111111168885 (11 i„((((YYYYY/ 1!1Y11llllpuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu( 11(11(1111( 1 11111111111 1111 110 1,11,11111111 WAS I n' pv 11111V111111111151111111111111111111111' 1,111 v V' )I�I' HII6IIIIIIIIIIIIII,111 !I11I III 11111)))) ))))))))))))))))1 ;1,1 g'i��l!IY(I'11111111gVP1P((hiIIIIIIf)111I VIIN'1JP r 9 //4 Ian a ill, " 1111.1 1¢ 11 "y!!!!!!!!!)".!!!!!!!!!!!!!"(11(!!!!!!!!! 141 Ir ! 01!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!! 11,1114 0 (111' +1111III N(liil 1'111 AlI1r 1111111 1 II ICiI fib° lrll 1'I, ,III ,Iu lylu 11114 , )UWIVII,,,,,npl I� 11111 wiiiiiiduuuuuluuuuu ^I' ryryI1 wiu"uuul Iol ll@ 111111 1111.11 I 111101 1I 1111111111111111 EXHIBITA 0. 0 Lry to Q u u 1 0 s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Christi DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete 0 O 0 g U • U t • "O •O • • CC U O • 0 o H U U U cd Cd 0 U "'O ..O Q g .12 cCd0'oA F-, O 0 U 0 ^0 o w • v, U f9 U ".O • "'O O O c � o' -V, • +D 0 • on 5 g E • 5 g g Dto o o ° g, • 5 Q • Q Q' • U • 0 O 0 CC `oA • • a) O 7.1 is E 0 4-50 0 0 4-5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �'�'�'�'�'�ililililililll+!If f f f f f 111111111111111111111111111111111111 V 0 cn 0 u u 1 a. EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Ch 0 0 0 N W 1- 0 0. a F 2 W F uj W 2 W O 2 Q 0 W I' i 1114uuuuuuu 1101. muu O Illium u�m IIS' omim 1,11,111111,1111 sao • cO o-! P21 u � a) I O g O o a) a) O T2 O 0 O U 0 O U a) a) a) U a) a) a) a) U 0 a) U cd O cd 0 O a) 0 a) 0 O 0 O U cd a) a) 0 0 O CDU cd cd a) a) te-' a) a) O a) 0 "'O .N Cd a) 0 0 O a)a. Cd Cd a.) 0 0 Cd 0 "'O a) Cd 0 N a) 0 0 •0 a) "0 a) a) 0 O cd a) U a) N 0 cd a) 0 0 bA cd a) 0 O rn0 a) a) EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Christi DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete o o O 0.m a ZW WZ Xw W o >a Wm Building Type/Density Typical Height Range 1,000-1,500 residential units a O— >H w = N C1=. 41 0 O ++ d 47.= U =t=6 +' fG = = O' ° iN�l�l�ivw 1� ��„1„1„,„:1:1„1„:„1„1„1„..WWI 111111"1):4 M j �i1111111111111111111111111111111111fl' ; 11111 affffffffffffffffffffff ffr uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu i�% d � 1i,f11111lll11«,„µ '' nf,, e"I p�nlV1�y 14I� , • rrrllrrriiii. , E Lt O • Lt 0 O N U "::i .4 " 5 OO tO F. o a to A 0 O 1 . ' GQ ct ^O 5, cC �zt -, Fey d t O o - C N ', O �O ^0 W V CC 4 ~^ � � z l 0 U U oF. zg o I 4 w O of Water Street. Other residential and institu- 0 0 U zA U •U 0 • 0 zA z/) U C." U 0 O 0 O U 0 0 O zA 0 F-, uuuu!;I'u!11!�dlllk� �u Mlf4 ovpull'il14 U to the west Bay Vista Apartme NIIIIIIIIII EXHIBITA zect Corpus Ch DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora s and the SEA destinations to the Marina • Q co g co O U6, to - 0 . U O g "O Q ,4 to a) "O .t O a Cd e the form of a) 0 -d 0 cd .� c PQ Pi 0 ,5 5 improved streets. south corridors such as Tanc O 0 U N g cd 0 0 E U 0 IDA N z a) 0 0 '0 create a more intimate walkable environment a) 0 E "O W a) a) 0 0 PQ a) 0 O E Cd a) U cdU U cd Cd cd a) 0 O a) 0 U to 0 to aj t U CD U U 0 44 cd zt tO U . U •, U 0 LI) cn 'On 0 H `HO 0 0 4- 1 " o g to '0 H Cca 4. d O0 "CI F a U bAg a memorable district center. EXHIBITA DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete OQ0 1111191111111111,11 •INII11111'1iil11wi0`i,1•11i SIIh c""'"' �rV11��u1mmaw:ly v gl l 1 V 'V1m, M r1 II .i'� �9 & Y 1,I11I11010!Ii10 11 ..� ! a V1041 ii1 ,:11:::1:::.11,11 1 \ to l fi II �W v,rwl i h�I qiw 1'111'111'111'1'1'111'1'111'1'1'1'1'1'11 01110 111111111111111111111 Il�llll�i((IIIIIIIIIpO 111111111111111111111 ,N14111111 Iv II vll,ll^>Vif trail network for the Downtown Area could be in- a) a) 0 a) 0 0 U a) 0 O U 0 U 0 cd rci a) rciU 1 0 0 a) a) U 0 O rciU 0 0 0 0 0 a) 0 U cd cd 'O a) cd ci) a) a) 0 0 F-, a) cd a) 0 0 Ca 0 zrz a) a) a) cd 4i a) 0 O N 0 0 rci sda 'O 'O a) 0 U rci a) P-1 'OA rci P-1 ° O a) 0 a) ani cd 0 a) t Q � O y, a) t • F~ cd • o • Cd U cd cd a) a) a) a) a) 'O 0 O 'O U U a) cd (33 0 cd 0 O 0 cd a) cd N Fti 0 r� l ,1111 Iu1((111 �u11111111111111111111 II1 11V 111111,11,11 111441 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 ...1111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 11V N�yK�(iui,llll? Mmm +a lwN I�IIu"111NIIIWII'U'w �ll II pm • I.. I II VIII •;;1111°I1•rrd01111M1'll'h11�.,1111M1111Cab'' IIID ul dli. � N 0S 0 O 44 O x 0) 01 0) U O ti ▪ d .14g aN • .14 • g E N a Ittt EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Ch • 0 •a ro E� W no 0 CD— ID IIS omim 111111111111111111111 n 111111111111111111111 O c2 E • •O • • • c • korer 111111111111 1111 tan 0. . Jr 6'111 11111111"".. 1111 n11111C div 0 a) 0 U a) U a) 0 c X .0 o ca U 0 O O o O O a) U U 03 ct O O a) 4• • a) z• o a) • • U a) • N a) a) at Staples and Leopard Streets. Established a) 0 •• • a) • •0 U cd a) a) 0 cd cd cd 0 cd 0 O U a) a) c 5 0 0 a) O 'a) • CD [d0 o g • g a) • 0 • 1. a) q • o c U O s SOi Fl 4-3 0 U Cd a) saoO ami a) 0 biD ui 0 0 Ty O 0 0 0 O s. s. 0 ;, "k a O 5 4 0 o .' O a t-, 4 a) c o �0 N 0 ', •. • U 0 cdo , a) O • 0 • a o -0C "0 .0 • 0 • a a) 00 c o 5 o• .-c20 N U .- owe O a) (i) 0), • a) U ri a) • ▪ " U 0 cd 0 �, 0 • ' +� O C Q) ... U a) : N 0 • + a) c 0 Q) U v 0 "0 Z 'OA O a) by ., 0 • a) a) . o o a) Za)a)0 O 5 S:24 E .t 0 EXHIBITA s fora vibrant and connect Corpus Christi DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete 111111I III) III II IIIIIIIIII' I';";;';;IIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 � u y�+mn a/plll r liuliuuwryiuuuul� lE +O-, g 0 c o E •F' g S cd ct L H."'a) rn,"' O c o ". F -i r/] a9 N '� O a a""' F-, U F., .i1 U bA bA ;t F -0U P g 5 0 O 1 `o.0U tO O- O 00Q -zea) o .0 5 0 c••� g 0 ct •n +, Q' Z CI 0 a O F,_, a) E �� •N H CD , .0 cn - 0 5 0 t , c c U r+0-, Lt 0 :~ y 0 O cic CD CD bcC-k-, v, —, o o ycD o aai •y g 5 E OF.., O cCp O U ,� Qgte�OO V � O a-' rn - 0) ".-a' 4- Lf) kD~ O "" � y O x ky bAr,,W Oaw.P..0+ ggwgctA ^Y O}0'tU � a o ' Eu a y t; 4- Qu0 +SU�~¢y -k-, I- O O i 0 i/Ua) r+-,`. 0 i-, o a Iv) u2 121 y cC O U 4--� 0 F,' O -k-,+' °� CD 0 0 ed A x �, U cd a o a). 5. c0i ren PCI 0 0 76 r. .- R 0 U N ra O X = .� aN c o = • o C3 >�Y cuo 0 = ',73 N N O u', Building Type/Density Typical Height Range E o LL a' H C1) = tn t_. o >.. a) •++ 3 = = EXHIBITA IDOL. zect Corpus Ch DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora icular attention o o °o 0 F~ O U`0.0 '� 0 F-1 F-1Lt 0 • 00 - E Cd P4-0 O g p U U -d g Q'E"a 0 0 •on O '0 cUC 2 og .°o �� a Lt 0 +21UD co, r-, 0 0 0 d 9 r Fa NLt g cd N FQ Q g O o 0 cd cd oo .UD v U1 g o +54o o cd + o tti "'O Fq 11 tains the character of a mixed-use corridor with d small business - 0 0 0 ct H U U g • Q 0 �° 0 U) 0 0, N ° U c�C g a) a a) z • O O Q' C/2 1:4 z � U F H 0 0 U U "0 cC 0 O O 0 O 0 U U 0 0 O del 0 Proposed street section: Leopard Street EXHIBITA 001IP DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete retail, and businesses. 't Ti a) O +) .. +H 'OA 0 O 0, O a) zrz a) O F4-1 U -I �' FU -I O a) �+ 0 v) •0 v2 t '� •� *�. ami ami c ca 4 024 . Q a) c0 0 ca 0 0O 5 U o v) •� cd •t ao) 0 ,.- 11 0 H co c0 O N "O a) CD cn a) a) . .;~ '+ v) O eTh U cid0 v) a) "O . 4 a) "� . a) 0 U2 O a) 0 aa)) g bA 'OA "� ami 0 N "O a--' a) 'OOA SOA ) CD a) 4 FN 0 4-'- - - ,~ �Ui a . Ul to Westside and Downtown. Connection to the 0 cd a) a) "O O a) a a) O a) a) O a) a) a) a) T2 0 ":5 a) a 0 +3 a) a) i-, T2 a) 'OSA a) a) T2 a) 77i P 7:5 cd •I. 41 �! O zrz '� c� 4 :4,' C4 U a F -I U) 0 O o O O +' d sO, b.°;-,, ,-X a) '1,4 N G 7,9 0 aU ;, d ¢.04O°) 04 r o o U "4 +a0 a) iamai ) " -a c.n Cal „zrz 0rs n. L/)•. f� "� x A a) ccd 0 0 �0p� vi was ca CI) ccd d a) W o o x W "0 s.WI PA mg czo ' ��ppIIVUIpUUIUII�O�UU����iU>,<iwi�'�plp. 'f ohl tYl!� ml ,. PPi�';IrY yyl° Intl mr „off �If � idly lull 1 I „ Im rl I� h?�YIIIIYII u M ILII""tel".II wWN�Ihwl w�w�lliolV I �Ilah11; reetscape and i EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Ch 0 0 uj W F O a F z W X W z W O z 3 W 4uuuuuuu oroo. Ho O Iuu IID 61d11161d1111 111111111111111111111 42) • can e�• O H 6, f%! ii r//r, G2 1/,!o O, F/A 2 9L! 2/ 6 2 UG 2Gi 6 Saaa rt - • a) (1) a a) › U U �, bA cn 0 t • t U Q +' O o , g a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 O U 0 U T2 a) O 0 "'5 0 N U O a) O cd t .4 "O a) 0 U 5 o .`.9_,a0 a) N ran a) ze 4 • a) N ..O -, .1 U U a) a--' ., is O a) W contains numerous vacant properties. 0 0 a) O v2 21) a) a) O a) a) a 0 "'O 0 O cd P2I a) O a) ) a) T2 N a) a) a) cd O 0 O U a) 0 0 O U U a) a) 0 0 O a) 0 02 a) 02 • w 04 k O d cd EXHIBITA DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted prio �Ill�........„1,1,1111111111111111111111111 ,,,,,,,,,;111111111111111111,, r r/l rte` .,�"�✓.i..._:, ihrA mrhiro !fl //!1%'D�n//llfllll ■ ;II 'tdd �� • g O U g O "O O Q � U ..0 }; o 8 O o O —0O tO g "O 0 cd 040 O yy, 04 U O 70 04 0 -' C U E 5 5 O 'Op U `0.0LL, g g cC LUI tip U U Cd +., "O a) U of Staples Street and on vac 0 "0 U U 0 Fi U U 0 O cC • a-' • • • rcs 0 X rcs Q = �R d V W • pJ i• OU a zCT) z� gZ a= o< W Building Type/Density N .o N Typical Height Range CO 1,000-1,500 residential units _ 0 0 _ U 0 g t O 04 04 O 0 Q CU N O N 0 "0 0 5 CU u u EXHIBITA for a vibrant and connect Cor DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted �II"InIIIYI01OYn!r f00000.11000,7 V'r""""4fninm', ,, 1,011111110 1111, 1111111111111111' 1111=1111000 �III!!!!!!!I!I!I!I!I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Il lllllllu� IIIII�I� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I �IIIIIIIIIIIII II �S 1Il1rff(mII(((II I, I dffi 0,001 villlllllllll��l�, oI19J(hlti0 d o bA U U O F~ c ctcs O O O gS •u U -0 U a) 0 fu 0 0 +.0 fu fu 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 cC 0 E d attractive 0 0 O 0 0 g •0 U • • E U 4 • ion � o g a O 5 • "O +-e c0C U O O 0 U duiiuu° i;, 0011 ' teeme;:e me m lmromor Q y,N'. IIIIIIIII' 0 'on U bbA 0 0 Cg 0 0 O 024024 N 0 O 0 O U 0 z E + has been closed following relocation of its 0 O • E O O 0 O 0 0 N a E QI 0 0 0 0 F -i 0 0 0 U 0 "O 0 0 0 0 U F -a 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 Fti 0 0 024 0 Fti 024 024 0 0 cd U CO H EXHIBITA u u 11211 x r. yHI DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted prio PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE NETWORK 0 O 1-00 0 'O 0 O FU -1 0 0 11 0111[1)10 4, 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'111111' 1 '11 1111 l'"""""""""""' i� ade intersection cC 0 O U 0 O U O O g MI▪ 0 g ▪ U U '0 O tO O g 0 c6 N . 4-i 0 H 0 District will transform the street ne a) 'oA U a) 0 O U a) 0 cC c�C 0 a) 0 O U DI 0 mi 11111111 IIII mu '11111111 1000 1000 111111111111111111111111111 111 01111111111011111111111 a) a) U 0 "0 O 'oA U U O U O cC cUC U O z a) FSII W Pi �M a ct o 121 t tO t `°A g a) '0 a) a) ” g 5 45 a) o o cn x U a) 0 cC VU ) • a) "'O a) U � O —1 g O a) +" a) . Hillcrest, with connections to the Harbor Bridge EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Ch 0 0 0 uj W F O 0. 0. 1- z W 1- uj W z W 0 z 3 W 4uuuuuuu g ll111111u)u F 444 1111111 1111, tci'°- cC •' O ai -n '.I-, `-2 n0 n¢T� n�d ma) p o ai a 0 t a)� �• ij ami °' c ` cd ami o a) .0 0 4 a -i 'on •-, c� o i)) 5 0 E,a) 0 a o .� 711 o 2 4u +[6� 'a)Oct-,0tetO u.��N"�00 't¢4 a) • 4- a) ' cd t o� o a) 4- zn Li)_-a)d 'Oa)U aOO F F -i U �/ U .t );.> O Up�. O� n �*UO O .N Li) 0 0 0 N 77,0 U 0 Cd N a) z 0 cd a) z cd mentary School. EXHIBITA opooloolo yoloo CJ DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted prio , e00000000 Hhv U ct 4. 4. CIDO O O g g 0 +' 0 c H U g 4. CID U U • O E N O cn U N a) co O 'd "O E 0 0 o c� c cc) "0 ct ct cc) 4. 4. CID CCi U U 4. 0 4.CID 00 4. U U CIDU F -i 0 0 F -i E CID 0 0 0 4-i 0 0 0 H U U U 0 0 0 U G 'oD c Et; 5 P1 o U O a CCS r .. • ct • • •01)•O 'o O 00 O O - 0 tox • U 0 • • • E O U 0 • O EXHIBITA 111110000000 1111111000 IMOD IIIIIIIIIN fora vibrant and connect CO) DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted II11i l ,0111 11110100011,111 1�1,I 1 ,' 1µl 1111111 110011110101011111111111100 ."l 11 in 111111111 i p1�1111:11 11 0 U U 0 0 0 0 ct a) 0 a) E ct 0 U 5 0 U O O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cu U • U U U ti U EXHIBITA DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted prio EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Ch 0 0 uj W F O 0. 0. 1— z W 1- uj W 2 W O 2 Q 0 W 4uuuuuuu NI. F 0 um,-„��,� .5 Oat N U'W' '154 ri�uiooi� aon a) o o o °' t ai ami r rn 0 0 t (1) 0 CD .JH 5 F-� N 5 cd �', '+-, N O N v2 M N cC �, O' ca ow 55, rn 0 rn 4- za ve 0 ami P� 'on . 's + t ai .' `'cl) a`ui a0i 0 . •s Q p .� ,� _ .-, N �' ,rn � sem-, ,x '� ,4? "O W r 0 cC 'of, Q Q "O t ca N 0 ¢' L F, c, ga) 0 0 ani a° •. N o c� a o C ,- t o + ”ti 'az a cd N Q 0 .��., O sO, "O cd ¢, "O N EXHIBITA s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Christi DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete U = 111111111111111114 uuuuuuUppulU J1"#/""puuuuw 'l Current land use in the SEA District is focused •. U U � O O a • O N g g U c� 'oA � g U "O U g PA o a) U U U 0 N U N U U 0 O O U U _) O cC a) 0 O 0 0 U E a) z..i U a) U U 0 O derutilized or vac 0 O 0 O U U U cC U U cC cd U c� o 0 ct oA H cC � U to cd g U g O Q "O • 0 PA t 0 rd g c C O cC a) U Building Type/Density Typical Height Range N (B = QW C6 N OCL) 44 - NO CCUo O O O = oC'o O O N O o Lc, oo c..1 C_.) u u EXHIBITA for a vibrant and connect Cor W F 0 a 1- z W 1- uj W 2 W colt Ei O z 3 W uuuuuum W 6dl�l - Ills u.I .ti a) a) ":5 a) 0 O a) ) a) 0 a) ) "O cd U N a) biD 0 "Ci a) U a) O a) cd a) a) 0 0 ei a a) 0 'd biD "O a) 0 U a) 0 U U 0 a) ci) a) a) F -i 0 ,: O a) g U � a) a) cu cd � co O a) 0 .O c*' U t a) co 4 a) H 0 w 0 0 0 0 4.10 1,4• yard between the Convention Center and Art 0 0 z 0 a) a) a) ttoO +) a) a) 0 F-1 0 "O 0 U a --P 0 0 'Op "'O `Op 0 O }; U a) Q 0 O W U ..o a) g a--� g 5 app 0 0 CD 0 O "O a) 0 O T2 a) N O U a) ) a) T2 0 P-1 O 'Op 0 Cd 0 U .ti a) a) "O 0 O 0 i,, " iiNiiR; r 11,1j11 ppm PP wmw ismnr ill 100 mil h 416 Ibx EXHIBITA AUGUST 15, 2017 opooloolo yoloo CJ DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted prio with a station at the Solomon Ortiz Center com- plete the SEA District access network. O -d 0 g U 00 O a) U cd • O O ;E') O '� ^ 0 U U U Cr) H F. O N U O O O g H :5 x U O U "O g g O a U O 0O Cd U] U H • E 'OA 0 • 0 • 00 Q • 0 • O Cid bA U }, E 4) U U U 00 a) 0 0) 0 Cid O U 00 0) ct ct0 O U U 0 O U 00 cd N U cd U bA 00 N cd O cd O 00 cd cd U N N O Pa O U 0 L t o • U Pi H N •a oO g a g g U U U 0 0 GQ 0 0 U a) cC 4—i 0 E tor and recruiting awater ferry or similar service 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 puuuuum1 Illllllj 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 un'::::::::::::::::' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII000000mm qa�'' uuuuuum 1'1 cccittli1 j 1„..,i1„..,i', I II iiiuuuouuuouuulh' tluuuuuu otted/{Ibii r 1111111111111111 'I 00 0 Ln EXHIBITA zect Corpus Ch DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE NETWORK ani ani . a Ucii -0 aa) , �, 4-1 +' cCt 4-1 Z +'W cC +' "O O p pC CD p ^OU N p 0 + UUza g �t N EN 4 6+IC D" 1 +k1e- UO U a -QO"+' +t •N oU .+' a, g ttO cg U H o Q � ti W °a cra��'o p -0r :g " tc- ) ct' . ' 4 - o a) t. "' .. E o a) P, •5.0 —I TC' 'l . c6 ° p N -k;)" R+ ��"-, U� OU `� N to �" c�C '� CO O +� U i� N N Ste" F.-, p 0 5 �"' ..�-, .5_, U '�' U U a� +' .o 5"0 U +� U 0 U o +, U U c� °oU c u p pnt ct o ++ aaC CD W A O O U Pa 0 d i 4i 4-4�UAF v on +� ^ +p'Mcd +U ani ' side enhanced 1 UO +' 0 O •+ 2g N • ' t U U 4-1 U +�' 0 O CO C6 .-. P) U +-° ^o U Pa ^o ,—, U 0, t0' a) O tar) tO 77-r tO o U U t' U U 0 t U g g •g •g" U ca tO V C o P a) g O • U ra t .. ili +, 3a EXHIBITA 0.00 s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Christi DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete [1111111 11111111111nm IIS 1110 1111111111.111 uryl'' 1111111,1,11111111111111111111,1,1L1,1,1,1,11„, 1111111111111111111111111 �! I1111111 1111(1"111m111111 111111 1111111111111111111111 11111 II II dil11 111 000000 1 t� ,;;;iglll'V oommr Port Street. d 1 VNw'Y'�ri r� 00 0 cn w u u 1 EXHIBITA "Beach and attractions" orth Beach is a tourist destina- tion and beachfront residential a) bA 0 t 0 U2 O a) 0 cd 0 a) 0 a) T2 a) H a) 0 0 • a) a) a) 0 0 U sao0 0 to a) a) cd 0 •Q a) 0 0 U •t Q cd • 0 a) 0 0 U 0 0 0 .ti Q a) cd 0 cd a) P2I O sDiD Pa so cd a) -02 a) a) 0 0 'Oh 0 a) U a) a) a) a) 0 0 a) 0 a) U (I) FSI sDiD a) a) a) cd a) a) a) O a) cd P2I a) Cd Cd a) a) O a) Cd O 0 • Cd 0 U to the north—with raised first floors and other I O a) o o cc • a) O • g Piq 02, a) a)• a) 0 0 0 O CDz 0 Cd U • N co 0 0 z 0 O 0 4-I a) bA sao 0 U a) 0 a) a) cd U 0 a) cd a) 0 0 a) cd0 a) P2I O z ° " z 0 773 "0 O ¢ U N O a) a) cH Fti bA 0 cd ct 0 o o a) o ° CD O 0 4) b.0 • •1. 0 cd a) P2I O z 0 a) a) a) 0 0 0 U 0 cd a) P2I 0 z a) rl rl O a a) 0 0 5 a) Q EXHIBITA u u co s for a vibrant and connect Corpus Christi DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targete U III IIID/ii /iii nmr"'r0r r i'I 1 11111111111111111111 11!..'1111111111 u I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 I 11111111111111111111111111111111111 :11111111I c6 a cd 0U Lf) U 0 0 0 o cC• „O H g U O O N F -i 0 O PA O cd g 0 ty gn cd 0 rs Fi North Beach P1 • • • • ff r z P4 • be used to help a r a a N 0 cd bA 0 a) N E O N cd N PA 0 z • E 0 '0 0 0 U cd 0 E F. cC 0 b40 rn g E o iV z o 0 ocrj - �0 ¢' c "O 0 F-1 c b.0y� V) •� "O g cd . co cd Z N g N 0 4.-n', 0 a) -E o 0 C o ..O co ze0 ..0 ra n 0 bA g 0 g O O O 0 O Q 4i N "0 0 0 0 PA a) 0 0 PA O 0 cC cC 0 O Building Type/Density 0 775 775 N U a) U 0 O -F'1) 0 0 0 0 0 zA "O U 0 0 0 U zA "O N N N Typical Height Range a) U 7 0 0 'D 0 "0 "O 0 U 1,000-1,500 residential units u u 1 EXHIBITA zect Corpus Ch DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora o � � •N 0 48 d N C,1 0 *c2 cf3 titi O 5.▪ 2a 0 x , NCS POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITES cC .51 •X O •5 O 0 O "O cd 4i U O ct co X PA H a) 0 U and Surfside Boulevard for wa "North Beach Boulevard" should also be cre- E O E 0 ctg d to the recreation trail 0 co U PA 0 O z 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 U (co) 0 o 0 F'•i g c+ -,z o • • U Pa • O g 0 O " ent centers 0 E FL) 0 O O should be maintained 0 O U 0 cC g U cC E 0 U a) U U U 0 O U 0 U U to PA ational trail c 0 U E U 0 0 U cC U PA 0 O z g FL) N 0 c • o ct g FQ e4z aa• � 'oA � N Eo 04 z o' • 4. "0 a cd 0 O 4.0 O "O 4. 4. Q EXHIBITA DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted prio EXISTING BEACHWALN eft M 1 19 o ti p R •O 4.3t i•Nti 742 dtu cv 6ols co z a EXHIBITA zect Corpus Ch U E DISTRICT FRAMEWORK AND REINVESTMENT PRIORITIES 1 Targeted priorities fora EXHIBITA i , limnsNT:3,,,,,Hi \\*017:\:'''\\,\:‘,\\\,,\\,!,\,\\,\\,\\\,\\\\\k:AtilkImmsItIOISIII %I Km mu"VIII At t',• :!„‘„»,:,,Irk‘41',',.41" pal afit: \inalumwm7:17i *SIMtill\:::,,,,,,,,,ii;411) o IIssII 9 1:::::: MI1 "‘i\i$ . t::lr ttsmust Mattt mass 1 r EXHIBITA O Fe 0 u z W 2 2 O u 1* dJ M N ce F I O LL m W 2 J W F Z muuuuu W IIIIII1111111 a 0 J his chapter provides a framework for future design guidelines for new development focused in TIRZ #3, but expanding to other high -traffic areas. The design concepts are intended to promote high-quality new development that promotes a walkable, attractive, mixed- use environment and maximizes value for new projects and properties around them. These concepts build off guidelines adopted by the TIRZ #3 Board as part of incentive requirements and emphasize walkability and hu- es of streets man scale. The guidelines vary according to three distinct t that occur in the TIRZ, that have different implications for program, design and vehicular access for properties that face them. The diagram at right and the following pages explain the design concepts indicates street t for each type, with visual examples. EXHIBITA u u O a, „III.). • 4,'• • I 6.) u z '1. IA 0 0 z uj z z 0 u u N H 0 N W z J W H MM a O w w um KEY STREETS & SEGMENTS cia U a 0 cn 0. V) 0 0 w om Park to Hirsch c) 0 V) EWEN C/J v) w w Cr) J CL U 0 w U 0 U w w 0 CY 0 w L¢i DESIGN CHARACTER CONCEPT: PEOPLES STREET 1,,''''..11111111111'111 irili11110111.11.1i11,1,00, vluu dIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPIIV1,11111111111111 III�titi� Id la'I 11111111111111111 o 11 111, �Mw�W�11 IIIIV11IIV1.1k.)0i 11,11 '11111111111111"T �I u Gtll ^ r 11 � II41G� � I l r Ndr1; 1111 010104 I IIIIII I II41iI�� luuul 11111111111111111111111 I.�I oo Oomplgl, !Ib II III holo,ohnlh.h„..,11,11111.100 loo Homo 000mog loo o VI 1111111111111111111111111111' P„ ,,1 I yr, ' Iu I100 1 I OV1VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV1VIIVIVIVVIVV III1IIIIIIII 0001 111 Ii110000 I 00 0 0000 M00 I ,. VP�IIBi��FePV�tl IV�PWPI o ��r- t 'd IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1����11�1�Qlll'�I��IVlJ 000 Ni, IVWOIII"�,U1A01�ry o' �G �IY07NP YiI II ),, 6p1FPtll I(m' L,piYi EXHIBITA III IIIIIIIIIIII 0 0 u IIIIIIIII a z uj z z u u N H 0 W z J W 0 z W X a 0 W w 0 KEY STREETS & SEGMENTS 0 il. Clj • WI EMU MMaffil 111111611 NZt �II�JI� � � ,;�I(pF N'Inr a"u"w�udNN,d�15���IRIS��u�y����l�plllllllll��51��"MPI ISI,,, i4 I jj I q"H,a IiJNr I� YHd Niro lY, 1 hilt u„�i,uHlllllll V;. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 B h1111 p 11 ' I I IlllllI rr lrl u, I1X,avu1l8 I��I l1I ylu,a,v���l r1ll.II I11Ism IMI,„„„wfvlr ICw, 0,10,10N Irr logdlVluam 01,1011 .MMVINV„!udo„r 11ov111111111111 111111111 1111111 II 1101000000000000000000001 , 61to, 1111111111111111111111111111100000001 ” 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1# jl 11111111111oh 1111 �� „ n II umlllmmlmohl Kr<,I iil; 111 ` cul"r"rlrrauPaw�l ��qv q ri '1)tlllllllllllllllllllll DESIGN CHARACTER CONCEPT: KINNEY STREET ,,Hummuo, 0,11,011111111 1, 44 0 0 uz uj z z0 N 0 u. uj z uj 1- 111 0.0 "; uj :04 ers KEY STREETS & SEGMENTS 0 0▪ 3 0 03 w 00 w w -▪ C3 CU -C- 3 ▪ b.0 < c•-• ,YD cep lar access DESIGN CHARACTER CONCEPT: SHORELINE BOULEVARD & 1-37 44 EXHIBIT A 0 ��IIII6�� C 0 u F2 W 2 2 u oiI N F u. W 2 J W 0 7 F 2 W X 0. 0 W W 0 L GUIDELINES arrangements. treatments a) • 0 "o a) ri) U UO CM N Quo• 0� O rnrn U a) I rn rn a) U U cd a) a) ca bA4-1 ;t .71 .0 "C2 Pa 0 0 aa)) cd 4-, a) a) a) a) 0 4-, 0 N 0 ci a) (1) 0 a) 0 U 0 a) a) a) at the street level that have human scale and are ical of adjacent traditional 0 O a) a) a) 0 a) a) 0 0 N 0 0 -w Cd a) 0 O I1111, lii° 21111, ILII 21111, oct lodu ••ll a) 0 O a) 0 O 0 O 0 5 ia) a) a) bA a) 0 U a) a) a) 4) a) 0 U .0 A c 0 O 7 cd a) "O O tr3 (1) Pa 0 O a) a) "c a) 0 U "O a) a) 0 0 P( 0 ci) a) a) T2 cd a) x aa)) a) 0 a) 0 U 0 O N cd w 1,10 0 a) "o •0 N 0 0 N a) a) a) 0 0 a) a) 0 a) a) a) 0 0 0 a) ci) a) 0 0 72,1 "O due to downtown's Ba 5 0 ci) a) 0 0 O ci) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) (1) (1) a) a) 0 O 0 U 0 0 a) a) ci) a) a) 0 00 a) 0 0 a) a) aa)) 0 0 O 0 a) a) a) a) a) (21 0 U .ti a) 0 0 tto 0 O a) a) a) aa)) 0 O a) a) za a) 0 O bA 0 U 0 0 bA 0 a) a) a) 0 a) 0 0 0 cd a) a) a) 0 U a) 0 O 0 a) a) ci) (L) a) 03 cd ') a) 03 0 a) 0 O bA cd a) 0 116 0 cd a) s-) a) a) 0 0 a) a) 0 ami c • O • 0 a) g `o.0O 0 0, g cd a) U [d a) "O \ a) a) a) a) a) aa)) a) a) 0 U 0 a) 0 0 O bA 0 P-1 a) 0 0 O a) a) a) a) 0 0 O a) a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 O cd bA 0 a) cd " a) cd a) s°)) O "O a) O 0 U 0g N cd o 0 O cd "O o o 5-02 a) a) 0 0 a) 0 0 cd "O cd • •- a) a) "t 0 0 ..o a) F-, 0 .t c• d O O "O o "O a) a) Cd N O oOO11i01loolo 1111111 '/6�4, /91��;yii44rtir PWO➢II�90V �'7� �o11111mrv��>w "gym 1111 i 111411), X06Irri1111 olulululuuuluMN1 1 0.4i1iigoop 00000000"ot yrs Ln O csi z a' EXHIBITA EXHIBITA m ce0 Fe ce 0 u z W 2 2 O u M N F O LL m W 2 J W H fl4 DunsZ a� W 6 O uuuuu D 0 ca.0 ti 0 cn w u u EXHIBITA z 0 a u�uum Q a at Q 1- uuuuu H , o 0 0 co �-' C •., a "o o f g"o a L g o ° o f t o .'w . z o'� s� o cC 0 4- .� g" O O r� O r�i� 0 FU-� O F-, ' U U ct U O "O U O .- a +' a"' o U 0 cC i� t to , cC . . , a -, N U to O zo N N 0 to ^'O +' c� U g4 U CC O Q .4i U "t Fti C cg j cc ' co 0 - c�C aai bA CD H "O t0-, "O W `� `0 bA ct P U 'op p c0C N cd a) cd t-� +' c�C ,, +, W H +, +�OU cC C "O o Eoa0 P-1 0 O Li)g "O o -60+, Fy o +, o cc.) O U cC O to O O _o c �n x Ct +; o o o +, .. -0 w O R bA ra g .� U U 0 cc�� U g O') , • 0-, O y'C 5 Q t0O F F -,0 E 1iiiiiiiiiiuuuuumumuu lumen uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluuuumuuuuuuu muuuuumuuuiiii11uuuuu 1111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Vuii1 III 1111111111 1111111111 uuuuuuuum1111111111111111111 '�� uuuuuuu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII001 0,100 moo II� 111111111 11115 .11111111111111111111111111L 1111 11 uuuuu uuuui EXHIBITA u u 00 a, z IIIIIIIII Q �wYV,�:P:�Mb J'IIY hIi+ANi. r E-1 0 a r r O pF 0 a 0 0 0 U 0 a) U U 0-, U ald Street once the former sewa • U OCOC Q o' O .0 CD � kJ } E o . O c O 0 g CC O O U Cy'C N Co'C `oA 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 O 0 0 111111111111111111111111 00000000000000000000000000000000,0000000010000000 IMO ''lml `}' •0 �", U Ltg ".O ,.o cd o tg 'U a, U 0 .415) U O O U Fg Cd Cii "00 - U O a• �-, ° �U U-, U.,-, 4-,U., O Q O ° g U) C 0 CD � i CD pq • �Q g U • CC U) O O .}a . U H r-, E, a 5 g ° PA 0 N U E 0+ CO CC U CC ct 5 O U o 0ci) g +''' a U U CI) 0 r-, N "O Q g 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 11olooluoll '111111111111111111111111111111 . 1,11,11111111111111111111 uuuuuuu � 01 1011 11=11M IIIIIIIIII - U S" O U 5+D ° cid 'CT 0 F. '/, 4' o U7:5O • •-5.2-0 ami 0F.0 0 °+ U .ti N F. bA H 01) 0 .0 ct 121 o Nei ° a) 0 g3 7,8 . 8 Q U --, 4 0 -r Q P 0 c U) EXHIBITA uur,nf. II�Pr".)444,14,44)4$4.41,44110,''' D Ir M.011)Yl/i�rul�uyv'11Yt & Idl mlrli7,'NI IV I vNI� 4I4119111111111111114441. d,d „, rrrrrlll// ItdYAY�Ir�+��r ul�il nllr rrr�, Imlhui�l"I nth c7; 0 0 N N H N u Ip uurmuul.r,,,,M. nr.U.nno roe,^mmuaa A," o l,,lllll 1pllll lulululullmuummuummo 1,000.1. MII65 �'rn, rl ;I�NDr I Nx IUU1 AUtl 44(4.4441.1441.1.T,444;.;,541.4441....1.0 4444(.4441444.'4 VOW ' Q U H g p g "O F° cC O U 4i ^O F~ U F~ F~ OQ ^p D tO Qcct • - 0 tcC . p fflo • U4 c �7 g, N 5 t N - C/I ^� aU' "O ., oD ct ate' oA O p p F; -i cL) z g 0 4' 5 g, 14° . H �� • - .� Cd O� C Q N + U H Cd "00.4 Li) H 0-''''0..-0 ate-' t. 0 k O ~ p N N U U 0 CI 4- "O t Npii O •UN' c/U N .� ° igij "6-1•, E III p N¢, p NU N tO F~ 0 Cd amrCL) FCC _da) �x UCd UISO 0 c/] CC N . 0 -��. z F a� gCt �• U aN Z ct P llumuum Q a y at Q ce ity and dining destinations. 1111.111 111.11 , i 11111111111 111111111 11, EXHIBITA u u N 0 wlr 6 u,w;1mmw, Nn nw, INrnrUit1114.110,, 6:10P00'01,10,100004 n01:1(hr/ 'IPI I�lb ' tt vjlllminlrii l r�l;i' hi 9VIw "' Me 0 II wlw. � 6N liI Iv w I vlVl ��hllP^lulus ��,,alJlia 'dt� IYIllllill��ill�'w�'� i, "IIIII�� 1004 N' 1 mmQliouuuum vivfifififififivvfififio 1100101 11 11111 0 1 loolooloolooloolool0000m000loolooloolooloolo 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .111111111111111111 1111 ( 111111111111111111111111 i0 a°��... . . o EXHIBITA u u O ILL 1 4 0 a. z 4 t— I I UI V f ^ V'IVr'llI°YII111 ' w m, NplaW I I r0 ILr IIIIIIJIrkII I1ItlIIrIIIYIIIIOm I ul r d,:v INS IIIIIIIIOry u l:111111i':•::.' omiouuuuuuumiluuuuuuuuuuuuj ^ rvl 11 uumiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum , n,.:.Ulll ru II %'nlllalli 'pl uuUd ull if,/II4 vr' •^ia' r61N1 jIr IYui IIV 6 I ,,»»»'.;,:,.:,',',',.f,!.;'.'•1';'...'•',,•',:III p dl ii H N mW i M 'lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllluuuuuuuuuuuumll' I^ hm IIPrx''',":!..i'"''' f ➢I Vara 0ul 1 14!. tY U III v 1.111 IP1 (IIII �, 10 Iwll a rl nl VII r X"lull'i rulllllr 4P(.lidlall 111,ulgpu°Ilgp ,, ufIII1NU°+ lu, ..y Idul,, wd IN?�7�i �Mvll I I sl IIMIti1Nw , ”'uluYlwlulil0lllllllllmu'Iliww�Vl a �^h!IM^a "� IH„ dlw ^dY rr I IWMI W'hv; " VI ^suuum�i1111i�11�uuuuumii II ^ I P ';'0 ?rmuuluuuuuuuumii P �Il4 IBS "_",„wwVlolol, I1mlMm „1� IYvI Ilh!i'vij"(NIIIIIII�II,4yIIJr1 1 �1 II'd::dllr9',�, 6 pl!w 6 �ialll� I 41, evV°'I^mol rewu• 11111 I,Irr'I yllrllmrllrllm r r� r �Ifl (.111l {!II uuuuuumiil lduuuuuuuuiiuuuuuuuuuuuuull '' IIII. a�IIIIIi;��iuuliiiiiiiiiP61 IIl�il���,lfllllllllllllllllllll1lr;j ' III Y�il���A M„IIVN„„, m°l',11111, C5 I0 I wlru N III 1141,11 41, 1111,„, 1,1Well` 1 'IY 1+11011VYWNlIII . vN tll "n �� N IOI 0 1 I�; 4Jlliin r^4flu^wv jy'�,rV!C wru , M11I�4 rrvlNV� m.:ll,, g a a) .p o H E CD C:), 0 O U �� t g U U o CD g U U Q0 2 O ea .5 U U CD Pq i > N a . U Q N o IQ 410 0 o Q Z MH HH C C Downtown Management District North Beach Community Association Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation 0 U Q Sports/Entertainment/ Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone O c 0 ment of Tr Uptown Neighborhood Initiative EXHIBITA u u 1111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 nummummummenumumon 111111111111ouluouluouluolooloolooloolool 111111111111111111111111111111111 W W 11111111111 11111010010010010010111111111111111111111110ululululululul IUIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIM'M'M'M = J gigunnomemmonolummomovuo Z EA uululuuluuuuuuluuluuluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluululu C/2 ovoloommon llllllllllllllllllllllum p 0010 ouuouuuouuuouuuou10100 p II Linn Cl2 ulllllllllllllulllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllulllll Z upppouvonnummung000000001 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII G..2 0000000000000000000000000000 0 C/2 111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111000000000000000100100100101001010010010010010010000100 C/2 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111000000001 >SM". IIIIIIIIIuuuuuumoum11111�1,11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVi I••••••W r• onnoommuo 1111111111, 111111111111111 ,y,,,,,,y1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,I,I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111, af u Irmo 40„, 11111111111111111 1IN AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Conducted by ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908 735-6336 www.ZVA.cc • info@ZVA.cc Research & Strategic Analysis STUDY CONTENTS An Analysis of Residential Market Potential Introduction Citywide Market Potential Market Potential for the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area Table 1: Annual Market Potential Target Market Analysis Table 2: Downtown Residential Mix By Household Type 1 1 3 4 6 7 10 The Current Context 11 —Multi -Family For -Rent— 11 Table 3: Summary of Selected Rental Properties 15 —Multi -Family and Single -Family Attached For -Sale— 21 Table 4: Summary of Selected For -Sale Multi -Family and Single -Family Attached Properties and Listings: Units Priced at $200,000 or More 22 — Single -Family Detached For -Sale— 25 Table 5: Summary of Selected For -Sale Single -Family Detached Properties 26 Market -Rate Rent and Price Ranges: The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area 29 — Rental Distribution— 29 Table 6: Target Groups For New Multi -Family For -Rent 30 — For -Sale Distribution— 31 Table 7: Target Groups For New Multi -Family For -Sale Units 32 Table 8: Target Groups For New Single -Family Attached For -Sale Units 33 Table 9: Optimum Market Position: 1,850 New Market -Rate Dwelling Units 38 Downtown Study Area Absorption Projections Study Area Building and Unit Types Methodology Assumptions and Limitations Rights and Study Ownership 41 43 55 66 67 ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908 735-6336 www.ZVA.cc • info@ZVA.cc Research & Strategic Analysis AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to identify the market potential for newly -introduced market -rate multi- family and single-family attached housing units that could be leased or sold in the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area. The Study Area includes the Corpus Christi zip codes of 78401 and 78402, encompassing the traditional downtown and the SEA district, as well as Washington Coles, Uptown, and North Beach. The depth and breadth of the potential market have been determined using Zimmerman/Volk Associates' proprietary target market methodology. The target market methodology is particularly effective in defining housing potential because it encompasses not only basic demographic characteristics, such as income qualification and age, but also less -frequently analyzed attributes such as mobility rates, lifestyle patterns and household compatibility issues. The remarkable transformation of American households (particularly the emerging predominance of one- and two -person households) over the past decade, combined with steadily increasing traffic congestion and unstable gasoline prices, has resulted in significant changes in neighborhood and housing preferences, with major shifts from predominantly single-family detached houses in lower - density, auto -oriented suburbs to a diverse mix of detached houses, attached houses and higher - density apartments in downtowns and walkable, mixed-use traditional neighborhoods. This fundamental transformation of American households is likely to continue for at least the next decade, representing an unprecedented demographic foundation on which cities can re -build their downtowns and in -town neighborhoods. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 2 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 For this analysis, Zimmerman/Volk Associates examined the following: • Where the potential renters and buyers for new and existing housing units in the City of Corpus Christi and the Downtown Study Area are likely to move from (the draw areas); • How many have the potential to move to the Downtown Study Area if appropriate housing units were to be made available (depth and breadth of the market); • What their housing preferences are in aggregate (rental or ownership, multi -family or single-family); • Who is the potential market for new housing in the Downtown Study Area (the target markets); • What their alternatives are (new construction or adaptive re -use of existing buildings in the Corpus Christi market area); • What they will pay to live in the Downtown Study Area (market -rate rents and prices); and • How quickly they will rent or purchase the new units (market capture/absorption forecasts over the next five years). The target market methodology is described in detail in the METHODOLOGY section at the end of this study. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 3 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 CITY-WIDE MARKET POTENTIAL Analysis of migration, mobility, socio-economic and lifestyle characteristics of households currently living within defined draw areas is integral to the determination of the depth and breadth of the potential market for new and existing housing units within the City of Corpus Christi. Historically, American households, more than any other nation's, have been extraordinarily mobile. In general, household mobility is higher in urban areas; a greater percentage of renters move than owners; and a greater percentage of younger households move than older households. Nationally, one result of the Great Recession has been a considerable reduction in household mobility. However, the City of Corpus Christi, where an average 18 percent of households moved every year in recent years, has a considerably higher mobility rate than the national average. An understanding of these mobility trends, as well as analysis of the socio-economic and lifestyle characteristics of households currently living within defined draw areas, is integral to the determination of the depth and breadth of the potential market for housing units within a given area. The draw areas are derived primarily through migration analysis (using the latest data provided by the Internal Revenue Service, and supplemented by the most recent American Community Survey data), but also incorporate information obtained from real estate brokers, sales and leasing agents and other knowledgeable sources, as well as from field investigation. As derived from migration analysis then—based on the most recent taxpayer records from the Internal Revenue Service—the draw area distribution of the potential housing market (those households likely to move both within and to the City of Corpus Christi) would be as follows (see also the METHODOLOGY section at the end of this document): Market Potential by Draw Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas City of Corpus Christi: 61.2% Balance of Nueces County: 5.6% San Patricio, Bexar, Harris, Kleberg, and Jim Wells Counties: 8.3% Balance of US: 24.9% Total: 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 4 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 MARKET POTENTIAL FOR THE DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA The target market methodology also identifies those households that prefer living in downtowns and other urban neighborhoods. After discounting for those segments of the city's potential market that typically choose more suburban, exurban and/or rural locations, and including only households in target market groups with annual incomes above $70,000 (those households with the ability to rent or purchase new market -rate dwelling units), the distribution of draw area market potential for newly -created housing units within the Downtown Study Area would be as follows (see also Appendix One, Table 9): Market Potential by Draw Area DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas City of Corpus Christi: 60.8% Balance of Nueces County: 1.0% San Patricio, Bexar, Harris, Kleberg, and Jim Wells Counties: 6.6% Balance of US: 31.6% Total: 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. As determined by the target market methodology, an annual average of over 3,400 younger singles and couples, empty nesters and retirees and compact families, represent the potential market for new housing units within the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area (see again Appendix One, Table 9). To create the appropriate densities in the Downtown, residential development in the Study Area should concentrate on the development of higher -density housing types including: • Rental lofts and apartments (multi -family for -rent); • For -sale lofts and apartments (multi -family for -sale); and • Townhouses, rowhouses, live -work or flex units (single-family attached for -sale). Excluding households with preferences for single-family detached units, then, an annual average of 2,785 households currently living in the defined draw areas represent the pool of potential renters/buyers of new housing within the Downtown Study Area each year over the next five years (see Table 1). This number represents less than 12 percent of the city-wide annual market potential of 23,745 households. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 5 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Based on the tenure and housing preferences of those 2,785 draw area households, the distribution of rental and for -sale multi -family and for -sale single-family attached housing types would be as shown on the following table: Annual Potential Market for New Housing Units Higher -Density Housing Units DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas NUMBER OF PERCENT HOUSING TYPE HOUSEHOLDS OF TOTAL Rental Multi -Family 1,480 53.1% (lofts/apartments, leaseholder) For -Sale Multi -Family 715 25.7% (lofts/apartments, condo/co-op ownership) For -Sale Single -Family Attached 590 21.2% (townhouses/rowhouses, fee -simple ownership) Total 2,785 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 1 Annual Market Potential Derived From New Unit Purchase And Rental Propensities Of Draw Area Households With The Potential To Move To The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area Each Year Over The Next Five Years Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas City of Corpus Christi, Balance of Nueces County, Regional Draw Area, Balance of the U.S. Draw Areas Total Target Market Households With Potential To Rent/Purchase In The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 23,645 Total Target Market Households With Potential To Rent/Purchase In The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area 2,785 Annual Market Potential Multi- Single - Family ... Family .. . .. Attached . . For -Rent For -Sale All Ranges Total Total Households: 1,480 715 590 2,785 (Mix Distribution): 53.1% 25.7% 21.2% 100.0% NOTE: Reference Appendix One, Tables 1 Through 11. SOURCE: The Nielsen Company; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 7 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 TARGET MARKET ANALYSIS As determined by the target market analysis, the annual potential market—represented by lifestage— for new housing units in the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area can be characterized by general unit type as shown on the following table (see also Table 2): Downtown Residential Mix By Household Type DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas PERCENT RENTAL FOR -SALE FOR -SALE HOUSEHOLD TYPE OF TOTAL MULTI -FAM. MULTI -FAM. SF ATT. Empty -Nesters & Retirees 19% 13% 29% 22% Traditional & Non -Traditional Families 13% 11% 7% 23% Younger Singles & Couples 68% 76% 64% 55% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. At 68 percent, younger singles and couples make up by far the largest share of the market for new housing in the Downtown Study Area. Among the principal factors in the larger share of the market held by younger households are: • Their higher mobility rates—young people tend to move much more frequently than older people; • Their strong preference for urban living, particularly lofts; • Their preference for rental units, resulting from their negative experiences during the recent housing recession; • The reduced mobility of older singles and couples because of their inability, or reluctance, to sell their existing units; and • The fact that, outside of cities like New York, Chicago, or San Francisco, downtown dwelling units are rarely the choice of traditional families, in large part because of concerns about school quality and the lack of private outdoor space in which their children can play unsupervised. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 8 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 This younger market includes a variety of white-collar professionals—the VIPs, Upscale Suburban Couples and Fast -Track Professionals; young entrepreneurs, artists, and "knowledge workers"—the Entrepreneurs, e -Types, and New Bohemians; as well as recent college graduates— Twentysomethings;. Approximately half of the younger single and two -person households would be moving to the Downtown Study Area from elsewhere in the city, 10 percent from the regional draw area, and the remaining 40 percent from elsewhere in Texas or the country. Older singles and couples (empty nesters and retirees) comprise 19 percent of the potential market for new Downtown Study Area housing units, approximately 52 percent of whom are currently living in other Corpus Christi neighborhoods. Empty nesters and retirees—ranging from the most affluent Old Money and Urban Establishment households, to the upper -middle-income Small -Town Establishment, Cosmopolitan Elite, Suburban Establishment, Affluent Empty Nesters, New Empty Nesters, and Cosmopolitan Couples, to the middle- income Middle -Class Move -Downs, Mainstream Retirees, and No -Nest Suburbanites—represent a smaller than typical potential market for new housing units in the Study Area; the collapse of the ownership housing market in 2007-2008 has had a significant impact on this market segment, as a larger number of older households are choosing not to move. At 13 percent, the third general market segment—family-oriented households (traditional and non- traditional families)—includes just three target household groups: Unibox Transferees, Full -Nest Suburbanites, and Full -Nest Urbanites. More than 30 percent of the traditional and non-traditional family households that represent the potential market for new housing units in the Downtown Study Area will be moving from outside Corpus Christi or Nueces County. Depending on housing type, family-oriented households, many of whom are compact families or single parents with one or two children, will comprise between seven percent (for -sale multi -family units) and 23 percent (for -sale single-family attached units) of the market for new housing units within the Downtown Study Area. In 2014, the primary target groups, their estimated median incomes, and estimated median home values, if owned, are: ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 9 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Primary Target Groups (In Order of Median Income) DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN MEDIAN HOME TYPE INCOME VALUE (IF OWNED) Empty Nesters & Retirees Old Money $155,100 $306,200 Urban Establishment $124,000 $301,000 Small -Town Establishment $111,700 $195,800 Cosmopolitan Elite $110,200 $174,500 Suburban Establishment $100,500 $163,100 Affluent Empty Nesters $99,100 $173,400 New Empty Nesters $98,000 $135,800 Cosmopolitan Couples $81,000 $168,400 Middle -Class Move -Downs $73,000 $109,200 Mainstream Retirees $72,400 $127,400 No -Nest Suburbanites $70,500 $101,900 Traditional & Non -Traditional Families Unibox Transferees $118,800 $161,100 Full -Nest Suburbanites $100,100 $131,800 Full -Nest Urbanites $79,800 $158,500 Younger Singles & Couples The Entrepreneurs $143,400 $241,400 e -Types $125,600 $289,800 The VIPs $104,200 $166,000 Fast -Track Professionals $103,800 $183,200 Upscale Suburban Couples $94,600 $140,700 New Bohemians $78,600 $244,700 Twentysomethings $72,400 $117,600 NOTE: The names and descriptions of the market groups summarize each group's tendencies -as determined through geo-demographic cluster analysis -rather than their absolute composition. Hence, every group could contain "anomalous" households, such as empty -nester households within a "full -nest" category. SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 2 Downtown Residential Mix By Household Type Derived From New Unit Purchase And Rental Propensities Of Draw Area Households With The Potential To Move To The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area Each Year Over The Next Five Years Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas Total Multi- Single - Family ... Family .. . .. Attached . . For -Rent For -Sale All Ranges Number of Households: 2,785 1,480 715 590 Empty Nesters & Retirees 19% 13% 29% 22% Traditional & Non -Traditional Families Younger Singles & Couples 13% 11% 7%a 23% 68% 76% 64% 55% 100% 100% 100% 100% SOURCE: The Nielsen Company; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 11 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 THE CURRENT CONTEXT —Multi -Family For-Rent— Thirty-four rental properties located within the Corpus Christi city limits have been included in the rental survey. (See also Table 3 at the end of this section.) Five of the 34 properties are located in the Downtown Study Area. Phase One of Bay Vista Apartments, a 169 -unit property located on the southern edge of the Study Area, is leasing one-bedroom/one-bath units from $1,035 to $1,535 per month for 697 to 940 square feet of living space ($1.48 to $1.63 per square foot); and two-bedroom/two-bath apartments containing 1,059 to 1,270 square feet ranging between $1,410 and $2,185 per month ($1.33 to $1.72 per square foot). Amenities at Bay Vista include clubhouse, business center, conference center, fitness center, and pool. Phase Two, the 164 -unit Bay Vista Pointe Apartments, the newest community in the Downtown Study Area, is now leasing, with rents at $1,035 to $1,340 per month for 616- to 905 -square -foot one -bedroom, one -bath apartments ($1.48 to $1.68 per square foot) and with two-bedroom, two - bath units leasing for $1,475 to $2,135 per month for 1,057 to 1,247 square feet of living space ($1.40 to $1.71 per square foot). In addition to a fitness center, conference center, and business center, property amenities include an internet cafe, a swimming pool, and waterfall. Nueces Lofts, the redevelopment of the former Sherman building, is leasing 64 studios, one- and two-bedroom loft apartments. Rents for 556- to 786 -square -foot studios range between $790 to $1,025 per month (between $1.30 and $1.42 per square foot); one-bedroom/one-bath lofts lease for $950 to $1,200 per month for 663 to 763 square feet of living space ($1.43 to $1.57 per square foot) and two-bedroom/two-bath 916- to 1,161 -square -foot units rent for $1,300 to $1,650 per month ($1.42 per square foot). Nueces Lofts provides a fitness center for its residents. Retama Vista Apartments is currently the smallest Downtown property, with just 16 units. Rents start at $710 per month for a 592 -square -foot one-bedroom/one-bath apartment and go as high as $1,220 per month for a two-bedroom/one-bath unit containing 1,023 square feet of living space ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 12 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 ($1.19 to $1.43 per square foot). Property amenities include a rooftop balcony and basketball courts. The oldest property is the Princess Apartments, which contains 59 studios and one- and two- bedroom units. Monthly rents range between $600 for a 375 -square -foot studio to $775 per month for an 825 -square -foot two-bedroom unit with one bath. One-bedroom/one-bath apartments contain 500 square feet and lease for $650 per month. The property -wide rent per square foot ranges between $0.94 and $1.60. A swimming pool is available for the use of the tenants. Site work and building construction has already begun on the Cosmopolitan, a redevelopment of the site of the former Lichtenstein building. The five -story building will contain 165 apartments on the upper four floors with retail spaces on the ground floor. The property is expected to begin leasing at the end of the year, with occupancies scheduled for the spring of 2015. Outside of Downtown, most of the other rental properties are located in the South Side. Six properties included in the survey are located in Central City/Bayside, one of which, Aspen Heights, is income -restricted. — One -Bedroom Units— • Rents for one -bedroom units start at $645 per month at Alameda Apartments, located on South Alameda Street. • The highest one -bedroom rent is $1,650 per month at The Villas of Ocean Drive, a new property that recently opened and is still in lease -up. • One -bedroom units range in size from 504 square feet to just over 900 square feet. • One -bedroom rents per square foot fall between $1.00 and $2.19. — Two -Bedroom Units— • Rents for two-bedroom units start at $805 per month at Alameda Apartments. • The highest two-bedroom rent is $3,000 per month at The Villas of Ocean Drive. • Two-bedroom units range in size from 909 square feet to 1,383 square feet. • Two-bedroom rents per square foot fall between $0.77 and $2.34. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 13 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 — Three -Bedroom Units— • Rents for three-bedroom units start at $975 per month at Alameda Apartments. • The highest three-bedroom rent is $1,889 per month at Camden South Bay on Ennis Joslin Road. • Three-bedroom units range in size from 1,100 square feet to 1,827 square feet. • Three-bedroom rents per square foot fall between $0.89 and $1.45. Eighteen properties included in the survey are located in the South Side, one of which, South Pointe Apartments, is income -restricted. Only two of the 18 Valhalla Apartments, built in 1978 on Everhart Road, and the newly -constructed Springs at Corpus Christi on Timbergate—lease studio apartments. The Valhalla studios rent for $550 to $575 per month for 550 to 575 square feet ($1.00 to $1.04), and those at the Springs are renting for $885 to $914 per month for 525 to 623 square feet ($1.47 to $1.69) . — One -Bedroom Units— • Rents for one -bedroom units start at $650 per month at Lipes Apartments, located on Cimarron Boulevard, and Candlewood Apartments on Airline Road. • The highest one -bedroom rent is $1,260 per month at San Marin on South Staples Street. • One -bedroom units range in size from 501 square feet to 921 square feet. • One -bedroom rents per square foot fall between $0.98 and $1.74. — Two -Bedroom Units— • Rents for two-bedroom units start at $765 per month at Candlewood Apartments. • The highest two-bedroom rent is $2,363 per month at San Marin. • Two-bedroom units range in size from 795 square feet to 1,186 square feet. • Two-bedroom rents per square foot fall between $0.87 and $2.54. — Three -Bedroom Units— • Rents for three-bedroom units start at $1,089 per month at Walnut Ridge on South Staples Street. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 14 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 • The highest three-bedroom rent is $1,843 per month at The Springs at Corpus Christi. • Three-bedroom units range in size from 1,088 square feet to 1,399 square feet. • Three-bedroom rents per square foot fall between $0.84 and $1.49. Three properties included in the survey are located in Flour Bluff/Padre Island. Only one—Water's Edge on South Padre Island Drive—leases three-bedroom apartments. These units have rents of $1,095 per month for 1,038 square feet ($1.05 per square foot). — One -Bedroom Units— • Rents for one -bedroom units start at $690 per month at Bay Club, located on South Padre Island Drive. • The highest one -bedroom rent is $1,080 per month at Compass Bay Apartments on Compass Street. • One -bedroom units range in size from 667 square feet to 836 square feet. • One -bedroom rents per square foot fall between $1.00 and $1.51. — Two -Bedroom Units— • Rents for two-bedroom units start at $810 per month at Bay Club. • The highest two-bedroom rent is $1,405 per month at Compass Bay. • Two-bedroom units range in size from 856 square feet to 1,062 square feet. • Two-bedroom rents per square foot fall between $0.93 and $1.32. Two properties included in the survey are located in the West Side—Peachtree Apartments, built in the 1970s on Peachtree Street, and Christy Estates on Holly Road. Peachtree rents range between $525 to $1,000 per month for 394 -square -foot studios to 1,122 -square -foot two-bedroom townhouses ($0.86 to $1.33). Units at Christy Estates are renting for $665 to $1,270 per month for 740 -square -foot one -bedrooms to 1,500 -square -foot three-bedroom townhouses ($0.73 to $0.95). Excluding those properties which have recently opened and are still in the lease -up phase, nearly all of the rental communities in the survey are at functional full occupancy (occupancy rates at 95 percent or higher). ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 3 Page 1 of 6 Summary Of Selected Rental Properties The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas August 2014 Property (Date Opened) Address The Princess Apartments 1001 N. Water Street Retama Vista Apts (2004) 425 Schatzell Street Nueces Lofts (2009) (formerly the Sherman Building) 317 Peoples Street Bay Vista Pointe (2014) 802 S. Carancahua Bay Vista (2008) 522 Hancock Number Unit Reported Reported Rent per of Units Type Base Rent Unit Size Sq. Ft. Downtown 59 Studio / 1ba 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 16 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 64 Studio / 1ba 1br/1ba 2br/2ba 164 1br/1ba 2br/2ba 169 1br/1ba 2br/2ba SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. $600 $650 $775 $710 to $1,225 $1,210 to $1,220 $790 to $1,025 $950 to $1,200 $1,300 to $1,650 $1,035 to $1,340 $1,475 to $2,135 $1,035 to $1,535 $1,410 to $2,185 375 $1.60 500 $1.30 825 $0.94 592 to $1.20 to 856 $1.43 1,010 to $1.19 to 1,023 $1.20 556 to $1.30 to 786 $1.42 663 to $1.43 to 763 $1.57 916 to $1.42 to 1,161 $1.42 616 to $1.48 to 905 $1.68 1,057 to $1.40 to 1,247 $1.71 697 to $1.48 to 940 $1.63 1,059 to $1.33 to 1,270 $1.72 Amenities Pool, laundry facility. Rooftop balcony, basketball courts, laundry facility. Fitness center, laundry facility. Pool, waterfall, fitness center, conference center, internet cafe, business center. Clubhouse, business center, conference room, fitness center, pool. Table 3 Page 2 of 6 Summary Of Selected Rental Properties The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas August 2014 Number Unit Reported Reported Rent per Property (Date Opened) of Units Type Base Rent Unit Size Sq. Ft. Address Amenities Central City/Bay Area Alameda Apts (2005) 62 1br / 1ba $645 to 504 to $1.00 to Swimming pool, 4422 South Alameda Street $725 726 $1.28 BBQ grills & 2br/1ba $805 936 $0.86 laundry facility. 2br / 2ba $845 1,100 $0.77 3br / 2ba $975 1,100 $0.89 Aspen Heights (2014) 153 2br/2.5ba $779 to 1,468 to $0.53 to Fitness center, 4855 South Alameda Street TH $814 1,490 $0.55 pool, Income -Restricted 3br/3.5ba $699 to 1,827 $0.38 to computer lab, volleyball, TH $734 $0.40 movie theater, 4br/4.5ba $689 to 1,967 to $0.35 to study lounge & SFD $714 1,969 $0.36 tanning beds. 5br / 5.5ba $679 to 2,299 to $0.30 to SFD $714 2,343 $0.30 Baypoint Resort Apartments 350 1br / 1ba $871 to 675 to $1.29 to Yoga, massage therapy, (1998; 2004) $1,126 822 $1.37 fitness center, 1802 Ennis Joslin Road 2br/1ba $1,061 to 909 $1.17 to clubhouse, pools, $1,161 $1.28 hot tub, BBQ pit, 2br/2ba $1,181 to 928 to $1.26 to cappuccino machine, $1,741 1,383 $1.27 walking trail, pet park, 3br/2ba $1,571 to 1,385 $1.13 to putting green & $1,821 $1.31 multi -sport court. The Villas of Ocean Drive 180 1br/1ba $875 to 580 to $1.51 to Clubhouse, (2014) $1,650 753 $2.19 fitness center, 4657 Ocean Drive 2br/2ba $1,570 to 1,069 to $1.47 to playground, $3,000 1,282 $2.34 waterfall & 3br/2ba $1,655 to 1,247 $1.33 to pool. $1,805 $1.45 Camden South Bay (2007) 270 1br/1ba $959 to 642 to $1.13 to Basketball court, 1701 Ennis Joslin Road $1,019 902 $1.49 billiards, sand volleyball, 2br/2ba $1,339 to 1,170 to $1.06 to business & fitness $1,379 1,297 $1.14 centers, pool, 3br/2ba $1,689 to 1,428 to $1.18 to BBQ/Picnic area. $1,889 1,570 $1.20 La Joya Bay Resort 1514 Ennis Joslin Road 336 1br/1ba $1,070 to 712 to $1.50 to Basketball courts, $1,485 878 $1.69 business center, 2br/2ba $1,290 to 1,119 to $1.15 to clubhouse, pool, $1,730 1,226 $1.41 fitness center, pet park. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 3 Page 3 of 6 Summary Of Selected Rental Properties The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas August 2014 Number Unit Reported Reported Rent per Property (Date Opened) of Units Type Base Rent Unit Size Sq. Ft. Address South Pointe Apts (1999) 5725 Curtis Clark Drive Income -Restricted Valhalla Apts (1978) 6730 Everhart Road Lipes Apts (2003) 3701 Cimarron Boulevard Candlewood 2002 Airline Road Walnut Ridge (1981; 2000) 5757 South Staples Street Chandler's Mill Apts. 6350 Meadowvista Drive South Side n/a 2br/2ba 3br/2ba 165 Studio / 1ba 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 2br/2ba 170 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 3br/2ba 288 1br/1ba 1br / 1ba TH 2br/1ba 2br/2ba 3br/2ba 704 1br/1ba 2br / 1.5ba 2br/2ba 3br/2ba 248 1br/1ba 2br/2ba SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. $539 to $662 $625 to $727 990 $0.54 to $0.67 1,189 $0.53 to $0.61 $550 to 550 to $1.00 to $575 555 $1.04 $675 721 $0.94 $790 910 $0.87 $825 855 $0.96 $650 to $700 $800 to $850 $1,150 to $1,200 $650 to $775 $700 to $830 $765 to $910 $824 to $964 $1,210 to $1,425 $679 to $759 $819 to $839 $839 to $899 $1,089 $687 to $975 $1,028 to $1,308 650 $1.00 to $1.08 820 $0.98 to $1.04 1,334 $0.86 to $0.90 501 $1.30 to $1.55 714 $0.98 to $1.16 795 $0.96 to $1.14 907 $0.91 to $1.06 1,088 $1.11 to $1.31 580 to $1.08 to 700 $1.17 830 to $0.99 to 855 $1.01 874 to $0.96 to 939 $1.03 1,133 $0.96 524 to $1.28 to 763 $1.31 935 to $1.10 to 1,035 $1.26 Amenities Children's play area, swimming pool, clubhouse, laundry facility. Clubhouse, fitness center, hot tub, pool, & tennis court. Clubhouse, swimming pool & laundry facility. 2 pools, tennis, basketball courts, clothing care centers, BBQ/Picnic area. Fitness center, 6 swimming pools, tennis courts, laundry facilities, racquetball courts, & free tanning salon Residents' lounge, pool, whirlpool, fitness center. Table 3 Page 4 of 6 Summary Of Selected Rental Properties The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas August 2014 Number Unit Reported Reported Rent per Property (Date Opened) of Units Type Base Rent Unit Size Sq. Ft. Address Crosswinds (1999) 6617 Weber Road Amenities South Side (continued} 176 1br / 1ba $725 580 $1.25 Fitness center, 2br / 1ba $895 813 $1.10 swimming pool & 2br/2ba $985 to 914 to $1.02 to laundry facility. $995 977 $1.08 3br/2ba $1,225 1,103 to $1.08 to 1,139 $1.11 Towne Oaks 185 1br/1ba $734 to 746 $0.98 to Pool, sundeck. 6310 South Padre Island Drive $809 $1.08 2br / 1ba $879 to 996 $0.88 to $959 $0.96 2br / 2ba $909 to 1,050 to $0.87 to $1,129 1,094 $1.03 3br/2ba $1,094 to 1,297 $0.84 to $1,219 $0.94 Camden Copper Ridge (1986) 344 1br/1ba $739 to 543 to $1.11 to Pool, sand 6635 South Staples Street $859 773 $1.36 volleyball, 2br/2ba $1,109 to 998 to $1.11 to laundry facility, $1,149 1,034 $1.11 BBQ/Picnic area. Stoneleigh Corpus Christi 348 1br/1ba $765 to 482 to $1.25 to Business center, (2005) $950 760 $1.59 grill & picnic area, 5750 Curtis Clark Drive 2br/2ba $1,086 to 916 to $1.13 to fitness center, pool, $1,162 1,030 $1.19 laundry facilities. San Marin (1997) 7221 South Staples Street Arbors on Saratoga 6225 Saratoga Boulevard 220 1br/1ba $800 to 724 $1.10 to Clothes care center, $1,260 $1.74 internet cafe, 2br / 2ba $900 to 931 $0.97 to pool & sundeck. $2,363 $2.54 3br/2ba $1,305 to 1,156 $1.13 to $1,720 $1.49 252 1br/1ba $878 to 760 to $1.14 to Residents lounge, $920 808 $1.16 pool, sundeck, 2br/2ba $1,012 to 955 to $0.95 to fitness center, $1,098 1,161 $1.06 business center, 3br/2ba $1,243 to 1,151 to $1.00 to basketball courts. $1,385 1,382 $1.08 SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 3 Page 5 of 6 Summary Of Selected Rental Properties The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas August 2014 Number Unit Reported Reported Rent per Property (Date Opened) of Units Type Base Rent Unit Size Sq. Ft. Address Springs at Corpus Christi (2014) 5702 Timbergate Gulf Breeze Apts. 6533 Patti Drive South Side (continued} 284 Studio / 1ba 1br/1ba 2br/2ba 3br/2ba 200 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 2br/2ba 3br/2ba Island Villa Apartments n/a 1br / 1ba 1641 Nile Drive 2br/2ba 3br/2ba Encore Crossings (2009) 2133 Nodding Pines Tuscana Bay (2014) 2921 Airline Road $885 to 525 to $1.47 to $914 623 $1.69 $1,129 to 857 to $1.32 to $1,211 909 $1.33 $1,429 to 1,062 to $1.28 to $1,519 1,186 $1.35 $1,801 to 1,302 to $1.32 to $1,843 1,399 $1.38 $900 706 $1.27 $1,035 to 899 $1.15 to $1,085 $1.21 $1,118 to 954 to $1.16 to $1,174 1,011 $1.17 $1,317 to 1,168 to $1.10 to $1,349 1,229 $1.13 $900 to 842 to $1.07 to $1,040 921 $1.13 $1,100 to 1,025 to $1.07 to $1,340 1,181 $1.13 $1,400 to 1,293 $1.08 to $1,440 $1.11 200 1br/1ba $909 to 824 to $1.10 to $1,025 853 $1.24 2br/2ba $1,124 to 1,033 to $1.09 to $1,254 1,060 $1.21 228 1br/1ba $929 to 789 to $1.13 to $969 856 $1.18 1br / 1ba w / attached garage $1,109 860 $1.29 2br/2ba $1,199 to 1,050 to $1.13 to $1,249 1,108 $1.14 2br / 2ba w / attached garage $1,401 1,176 $1.19 Camden Breakers (1995) 288 1br / 1ba 4901 Saratoga Boulevard 2br/2ba 3br/2ba SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. $979 to 651 to $1.49 to $1,129 757 $1.50 $1,179 to 876 to $1.22 to $1,269 1,037 $1.35 $1,739 1,226 $1.42 Amenities Clubhouse, pool, fitness center, coffee bar, car care area, dog park. Business center, fitness center, playground, pool. Clubhouse, business center, fitness center, pool, gazebo/grilling area. Pool w/ aquatic lounge, poolside grilling station, conference/study center, cyber cafe, fitness center. BBQ/Picnic area, business center, clubhouse, dog park, fitness center, pool & sundeck. Basketball court, business center, fitness center, pool, BBQ/Picnic area. Table 3 Page 6 of 6 Summary Of Selected Rental Properties The City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas August 2014 Number Unit Property (Date Opened) of Units Type Address Bay Club 9350 S. Padre Island Drive Water's Edge 9320 S. Padre Island Drive Reported Reported Rent per Base Rent Unit Size Sq. Ft. Flour Bluff/Padre Island 248 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 2br/2ba 250 1br/1ba 1br / 1.5ba TH 2br/1ba 2br/2ba 3br/2ba Compass Bay Apts (2004) 82 1br / 1ba 14501 Compass Street Peachtree (1970s) 3150 Peachtree Street Christy Estates 3942 Holly Road 2br/2ba $690 to $800 $810 to $970 $840 to $1,000 $714 $760 $865 $925 $1,095 $1,005 to $1,080 $1,295 to $1,405 West Side 230 Studio / 1ba 1br/1ba 2br/2ba 2br / 2.5ba TH 3br/2ba 262 1br/1ba 2br/1ba 2br / 1.5ba TH 3br/2ba 3br / 2.5ba TH SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. $525 $695 to $750 $835 to $895 $1,000 $975 $665 to $745 $765 to $905 $880 to $905 $1,085 to $1,135 $1,245 to $1,270 667 $1.03 to $1.20 856 $0.95 to $1.13 900 $0.93 to $1.11 714 $1.00 714 $1.06 860 $1.01 924 $1.00 1,038 $1.05 667 to $1.29 to 836 $1.51 1,018 to $1.27 to 1,062 $1.32 394 $1.33 623 to $1.12 672 $1.12 885 to $0.86 to 1,042 $0.94 1,122 $0.89 1,059 $0.92 740 to $0.90 to 820 $0.91 900 to $0.85 to 1,000 $0.91 1,200 $0.73 to $0.75 1,200 $0.90 to $0.95 1,500 $0.83 to $0.85 Amenities Pool, tennis courts, playground, basketball courts. Two pools, fitness center, tennis courts. Fitness center, picnic area, pool, sundeck BBQ grills, heated pool, boat slips. Clubhouse, pool. Pool. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 21 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 —Multi -Family and Single -Family Attached For-Sale— Two newly -constructed townhouse properties are currently being marketed in the Corpus Christi market area. Padre Beach View is a 30 -unit property located on Beach View Drive. The 1,300 - square -foot three bedroom townhouses are priced at $249,900 ($192 per square foot). The Cottage House at Padre Beach on Granada Drive is marketing four-bedroom townhouses priced between $284,900 and $529,000 for 1,852 and 2,475 square feet of living space ($154 to $214 per square foot). (See also Table 4 at the end of this section.) All of the non -water -oriented condominiums and townhouses on the market at the time of the survey in September 2014 are resales at three properties: Cliff House and Atlantic Lofts in Downtown Corpus Christi, and Country Club Townhouses, in close proximity to the Corpus Christi Country Club. The weighted average price of the non -water -oriented units on the market is $302,369 for an average unit size of just over 2,000 square feet ($151 per square foot). Two units are for sale at the high-rise Cliff House on South Upper Broadway Street—a 2,300 - square -foot two-bedroom condominium listed for $799,900 ($346 per square foot) and a 1,400 - square -foot two-bedroom on a lower floor for $279,000 ($201 per square foot). At Atlantic Lofts, on North Upper Broadway Street, four units are listed ranging in price from $275,000 to $349,500. All but one are two-bedroom units, ranging in size from approximately 1,800 to over 2,000 square feet ($161 to $178 per square foot); the one -bedroom unit contains 1,550 square feet ($177 per square foot). Seven two- and three-bedroom units are on the market at the Country Club townhouses. The asking prices range from $205,000 to $242,000, with units ranging in size from just under 1,900 to 2,550 square feet. The resale price per square foot ranges between $89 and $127. Multiple water -oriented condominiums and townhouses priced above $200,000 were listed in September, 2014. A 1,552 -square -foot three-bedroom condominium at Admirals Court is priced at $203,900; the highest price is $745,200 for a 1,983 -square -foot two-bedroom unit at Twin Dolphins ($131 to $376 per square foot). The weighted average price of all water -oriented units on the market is $288,166 for an average unit size of just under 1,500 square feet ($193 per square foot). ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 4 Page 1 of 3 Summary Of Selected For -Sale Multi -Family And Single -Family Attached Properties and Listings Units Priced at $200,000 or More City of Corpus Christi, Neuces County, Texas September, 2014 Housing Unit Price Per Year Development Type Type Unit Price Unit Size Sq. Ft. Built Address Padre Beach View TH 3br/2.5ba $249,900 1,300 $192 2014 15000 Beach View Drive 30 du The Cottage House at Padre Beach TH 4br/2.5ba $284,900 1,852 $154 2013 14890 Granada Drive 20 du $529,000 2,475 $214 Non -Water -Oriented Resales Cliff House CO 2br/2.5ba $799,900 2,309 $346 1965 Cliff House CO 2br/2.5ba $279,000 1,391 $201 1965 Atlantic Lofts CO 2br/2ba $349,500 2,013 $174 2009 Atlantic Lofts CO 2br/2ba $338,000 1,902 $178 2009 Atlantic Lofts CO 2br/2ba $290,000 1,799 $161 2009 Atlantic Lofts CO 1br/2ba $275,000 1,551 $177 2009 Country Club TH 2br/2ba $242,000 2,301 $105 1978 Country Club TH 2br/2ba $239,900 1,889 $127 1978 Country Club TH 3br/2.5ba $235,000 2,552 $92 1978 Country Club TH 3br/3ba $234,000 2,034 $115 1978 Country Club TH 3br/3ba $224,500 1,940 $116 1978 Country Club TH 3br/3ba $219,000 2,062 $106 1978 Country Club TH 3br/2.5ba $205,000 2,296 $89 1978 Weighted Averages: $302,369 2,003 $151 Water -Oriented Resales Twin Dolphins CO 2br/2.5ba $745,200 1,983 $376 1983 Twin Dolphins CO 2br / 2ba $699,900 1983 Twin Dolphins CO 3br/2.5ba $379,900 1,988 $191 1983 Twin Dolphins CO 3br/2.5ba $299,900 1,988 $151 1983 Sea Gull CO 3br/2.5ba $509,900 1,678 $304 1982 Landmark CO 2br/2ba $460,000 1,811 $254 1983 Las Palmas TH 3br/3.5ba $389,900 2,422 $161 2007 Las Palmas TH 3br/3.5ba $340,000 2,358 $144 2007 Marina del Sol CO 3br/2ba $379,000 1,573 $241 1981 Marina del Sol CO 3br/2ba $279,900 1,730 $162 1981 Marina del Sol CO 3br/2ba $240,000 1,108 $217 1981 Marina del Sol CO 3br/2ba $225,000 1,700 $132 1981 Marina del Sol CO 3br/2ba $209,500 1,573 $133 1981 SOURCE: Multiple Listing Service; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 4 Page 2 of 3 Summary Of Selected For -Sale Multi -Family And Single -Family Attached Properties and Listings Units Priced at $200,000 or More City of Corpus Christi, Neuces County, Texas September, 2014 Development Address Housing Unit Price Per Year Type Type Unit Price Unit Size Sq. Ft. Built Water -Oriented Resales {continued} Grande Vistas Duplex 3br / 2.5ba $365,000 4,392 $83 2003 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $349,000 949 $368 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $310,000 949 $327 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $299,900 949 $316 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $279,000 949 $294 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $275,000 949 $290 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $259,000 949 $273 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $239,000 949 $252 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $230,000 949 $242 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $229,900 949 $242 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $225,000 949 $237 1970 Gulfstream CO 2br / 2ba $219,900 949 $232 1970 Padre Island TH 4br/4.5ba $330,000 2,479 $133 2008 Padre Island TH 4br/4.5ba $312,000 1,765 $177 2014 Ports o Call TH 4br / 2.5ba $315,000 2,027 $155 2002 Point Tesoro TH 3br / 3.5ba $309,900 2,041 $152 2005 Seamount Cay TH 3br / 2.5ba $307,223 1,831 $168 2007 Nautica TH 3br/2.5ba $299,000 1,627 $184 2007 Portofino CO 3br / 3ba $289,000 1,392 $208 1974 Portofino CO 2br / 2ba $250,000 1,127 $222 1974 Portofino CO 2br / 2ba $240,000 1,127 $213 1974 Portofino CO 1br / 1ba $230,000 834 $276 1974 Portofino CO 2br / 2ba $214,900 1,406 $153 1974 Casa Viento TH 3br / 2.5ba $275,000 1,948 $141 2005 Casa Viento TH 4br / 2.5ba $209,500 1,948 $108 2005 El Constante CO 2br / 2ba $269,900 1,060 $255 1985 El Constante CO 2br / 2ba $249,900 1,060 $236 1985 El Constante CO 2br / 2.5ba $249,900 1,060 $236 1985 El Constante CO 2br / 2.5ba $214,900 1,060 $203 1985 Gun Cay Bay TH 3br/2.5ba $250,500 2,031 $123 2004 Gun Cay Bay TH 3br/2.5ba $242,000 1,800 $134 2004 Gun Cay Bay TH 3br/2.5ba $215,000 1,253 $172 2004 Palm Bay Village TH 3br/2.5ba $249,900 1,648 $152 2006 Vista del Rey TH 3br / 3ba $249,500 1,557 $160 1999 Compass CO 3br / 2ba $249,900 1,403 $178 2003 Compass CO 3br / 2ba $224,500 1,403 $160 2003 SOURCE: Multiple Listing Service; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 4 Page 3 of 3 Summary Of Selected For -Sale Multi -Family And Single -Family Attached Properties and Listings Units Priced at $200,000 or More City of Corpus Christi, Neuces County, Texas September, 2014 Development Address Housing Unit Price Per Year Type Type Unit Price Unit Size Sq. Ft. Built Water -Oriented Resales {continued} Mayan Princess CO 2br/2ba $239,000 1,160 $206 1984 Mariner Cay Marina CO 3br/2ba $227,700 1,193 $191 1982 Mariner Cay Marina CO 3br/2ba $220,000 1,193 $184 1982 Salt Cay TH 3br/2.5ba $225,000 1,603 $140 1999 Beach Breezes CO 3br/2.5ba $215,000 1,732 $124 2004 Cayo Linda TH 3br/2.5ba $204,750 1,539 $133 2000 Cayo Linda TH 3br/2.5ba $203,900 1,505 $135 2000 Admirals Court CO 3br/2.5ba $203,900 1,552 $131 1985 Weighted Averages: $288,166 1,493 $193 SOURCE: Multiple Listing Service; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 25 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 —Single -Family Detached For-Sale— The majority of the new single-family detached houses being built in Corpus Christi are located in the South Side or just outside the city limits in the south. Multiple properties in the area have recently completed new houses, which are now on the market, or have several under construction. (See also Table 5 at the end of this section.) The least expensive new houses being marketed in the South Side are Braselton Homes' Cottages at South Lake, where the base prices for the 1,100- to 1,500 -square -foot cottages range between $129,900 and $179,900 ($118 to $120 per square foot). Several of the cottages are alley -loaded, although most are more conventional models. Terra Mar is a large master -planned community being developed by Hogan Homes, with several subdivisions of varying lot and house sizes and base prices. The least expensive houses are being constructed at Los Vientos at Terra Mar; these houses range in price between $199,415 and $227,625 for between 1,750 and 1,780 square feet of living space ($112 to $130 per square foot). The most expensive houses are being built at San Cristobal at Terra Mar, where a spec house is priced at $504,700 for 3,144 square feet, and another, containing 3,578 square feet, is priced at $551,900 ($154 to $161 per square foot). There are multiple smaller subdivisions in the South Side that are also building and selling spec houses, ranging from Manhattan Estates, where base prices start at $242,900, to The Coves at Lago Vista, where the most expensive house on the market is priced at $585,000. Nearly all of the spec houses contain between 2,300 and 3,000 square feet, with a general price per square foot range between $104 and $140. New single-family development is also occurring in Flour Bluff and Padre Island, and on the West Side. The most significant new residential development is being planned adjacent to the Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort, where a mix of single-family detached houses, multi -family units, and waterfront properties is being planned. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 5 Page 1 of 3 Summary Of Selected For -Sale Single -Family Detached Properties City of Corpus Christi, Neuces County, Texas September, 2014 Lot Size/ Unit Price Unit Size Price Per Total Property (Date Opened) Price Range Range Range Sq. Ft. Lots Developer/Builder .... South Side ... . Cottages at South Lake (2013) $129,900 to 1,100 to $118 to 105 Braselton Homes 3,200 sf $179,900 1,500 $120 Terra Mar (2008) Hogan Homes Los Vientos at Terra Mar $199,415 to 1,781 to $112 to $227,625 1,749 $130 Los Arboles at Terra Mar 5,000 sf $192,490 to 1,686 to $104 to $238,490 2,300 $114 Monte Verde at Terra Mar 6,600 sf $267,990 to 2,192 $122 8,550 sf $367,990 Entrada Del Sol 6,000 to $315,490 2,458 to $128 to 18 (Villas} 12,000 sf $369,900 2,500 $148 San Cristobal at Terra Mar San Sebastian at Terra Msar Rancho Vista Braselton Homes Manhattan Estates (2000) Multiple Builders Ranch Lake Multiple Builders King's Point Several Builders 0.25 to $504,700 t 3,144 to $154 to 3+ acres $551,900 3,578 $161 1.75 to 3+ acres/ $240,000 $213,900 t 2,001 $107 396 8,614 sf $229,900 t 1,801 $128 $245,430 t 2,160 $114 $289,900 t 2,369 $122 0.38 acre $319,900 t 2,655 $120 $242,900 to 2,343 to $104 to 6 listings 6,720 sf $270,648 t 2,500 $108 0.17 acre $255,900 t 2,395 $107 $249,000 to 2,377 to $105 to 8 listings $310,000 t 2,860 $108 $259,000 to 2,487 to $104 to 6 listings $299,000 t 2,860 $105 t Spec or model home. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 5 Page 2 of 3 Summary Of Selected For -Sale Single -Family Detached Properties City of Corpus Christi, Neuces County, Texas September, 2014 Lot Size/ Unit Price Unit Size Price Per Total Property (Date Opened) Price Range Range Range Sq. Ft. Lots Developer/Builder .... South Side (continued} ... . Graford Place $264,900 to 2,525 $105 5 listings Multiple Builders $327,900 t 2,921 $112 Barataria Bay 0.15 acre/ $269,900 to 2,443 $110 3 specs listings K & M Homes $39,900 to $348,500 t 2,898 $120 17 lots listed $54,900 Graceland 8,000 sf $271,900 t 2,423 $112 Multiple Builders Kings Crossing 0.5 acre $499,000 t 3,652 $137 80 Multiple Builders $720,116 t 4,300 $167 The Coves at Lago Vista 0.5 to $539,000 t 4,045 $133 160 Multiple Builders 1 acre $574,900 t 3,242 $177 $585,000 t 4,175 $140 .... Flour Bluff and Padre Island ... . Pine Hollow $179,900 to 1,505 to $120 to 127 Fox Home Builders $229,900 t 1,090 $211 Blue Grass Estates Flour Bluff Pine Hollow LLC $229,500 to 2,125 to $108 to 9 listings $299,900 t 2,427 $124 Point Tesoro $229,900 to 1,966 to $117 to 5 listings Multiple Builders 6,200 sf $519,900 t 2,149 $242 Commodore's Pointe Multiple Builders 8,032 sf $650,000 t 2,300 $283 t Spec or model home. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 5 Page 3 of 3 Summary Of Selected For -Sale Single -Family Detached Properties City of Corpus Christi, Neuces County, Texas September, 2014 Property (Date Opened) Developer/Builder Unit Type Lot Size Unit Price Unit Size Price Per Total Range Range Range Sq. Ft. Lots .... West Side ... . Wood Oaks on the River 6,700 sf $247,000 t 2,137 $116 39 Multiple Builders {Phase II) London Club Estates 1+ acre / Multiple Builders 67,500 $354,900 t 2,635 $135 $448,116 t 3,125 $143 t Spec or model home. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. 7 listings AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 29 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 MARKET -RATE RENT AND PRICE RANGES: THE DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA —Rental Distribution— Based on the incomes and financial capabilities of the 1,480 households that represent the target markets for new market -rate rental units (hard and soft lofts and upscale apartments) each year over the next five years, the distribution of annual market potential by rent range would be summarized as follows (see also Table 6): Annual Market Potential For Rental Lofts/Apartments Distributed By Rent Range Households In Target Groups With Median Incomes At Or Above $70,000 DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas MONTHLY HOUSEHOLDS RENT RANGE PER YEAR PERCENTAGE $750—$1,000 135 9.1% $1,000—$1,250 150 10.1% $1,250—$1,500 260 17.6% $1,500—$1,750 325 22.0% $1,750—$2,000 245 16.6% $2,000—$2,250 210 14.2% $2,250 and up 155 10.4% Total: 1,480 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. Note: The number of households by rent range was determined by applying the calculation of a monthly rental payment, excluding utilities, totalling no more than 25 percent of the target households' annual gross incomes. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 6 Target Groups For New Multi -Family For -Rent Households In Target Groups With Median Incomes At Or Above $70,000 Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas Empty Nesters Number of & Retirees Households Percent Urban Establishment 55 3.7% Small -Town Establishment 10 0.7% Cosmopolitan Elite 5 0.3% Suburban Establishment 5 0.3% Affluent Empty Nesters 5 0.3% New Empty Nesters 20 1.4% Cosmopolitan Couples 25 1.7% Middle -Class Move -Downs 30 2.0% Mainstream Retirees 5 0.3% No -Nest Suburbanites 25 1.7% Subtotal: 185 12.5% Traditional & Non -Traditional Families Unibox Transferees 15 1.0% Late -Nest Suburbanites 5 0.3% Full -Nest Suburbanites 40 2.7% Full -Nest Urbanites 110 7.4% Subtotal: 170 11.5% Younger Singles & Couples The Entrepreneurs 25 1.7% e -Types 325 22.0% The VIPs 50 3.4% Fast -Track Professionals 25 1.7% Upscale Suburban Couples 110 7.4% New Bohemians 495 33.4% Twentysomethings 95 6.4% Subtotal: 1,125 76.0% Total Households: SOURCE: The Nielsen Company; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. 1,480 100.0% AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 31 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 —For -Sale Distribution— Based on the incomes and financial capabilities of the 715 households that represent the target markets for new market -rate for -sale multi -family units (condominium soft lofts and luxury apartments) each year over the next five years, the distribution of annual market potential by price range would be summarized as follows (see also Table 7): Annual Market Potential For For -Sale Lofts/Apartments Distributed By Price Range Households In Target Groups With Median Incomes At Or Above $70,000 DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas PRICE HOUSEHOLDS RANGE PER YEAR PERCENTAGE $150,000—$200,000 70 9.8% $200,000—$250,000 105 14.7% $250,000—$300,000 140 19.6% $300,000—$350,000 135 18.9% $350,000—$400,000 125 17.5% $400,000—$450,000 85 11.9% $450,000 and up 55 7.6% Total: 715 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. Note: For the for -sale distribution of both condominiums and townhouses, the number of households by price range was determined by assuming a down payment of 20 percent and then calculating monthly mortgage payments, including taxes and utilities, totalling no more than 30 percent of the annual gross income of the target households. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 7 Target Groups For New Multi -Family For -Sale Households In Target Groups With Median Incomes At Or Above $70,000 Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas Empty Nesters Number of & Retirees Households Percentage Old Money 5 0.7% Urban Establishment 60 8.4% Small -Town Establishment 15 2.1% Cosmopolitan Elite 25 3.5% Suburban Establishment 15 2.1% Affluent Empty Nesters 10 1.4% New Empty Nesters 5 0.7% Cosmopolitan Couples 35 4.9% Middle -Class Move -Downs 15 2.1% Mainstream Retirees 5 0.7% No -Nest Suburbanites 15 2.1% Subtotal: 205 28.7% Traditional & Non -Traditional Families Unibox Transferees 5 0.7% Late -Nest Suburbanites 5 0.7% Full -Nest Suburbanites 10 1.4% Full -Nest Urbanites 30 4.2% Subtotal: 50 7.0% Younger Singles & Couples The Entrepreneuers 50 7.0% e -Types 125 17.5% The VIPs 50 7.0% Fast -Track Professionals 25 3.5% Upscale Suburban Couples 75 10.5% New Bohemians 95 13.3% Twentysomethings 40 5.6% Subtotal: Total Households: SOURCE: The Nielsen Company; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. 460 64.3% 715 100.0% AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 33 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Based on the incomes and financial capabilities of the 590 households that represent the target markets for new market -rate for -sale single-family attached units (townhouses/live-work units) each year over the next five years, the distribution of annual market potential by price range would be summarized as follows (see also Table 8): Annual Market Potential For For -Sale Townhouses/Rowhouses/Live-Work Units Distributed By Price Range Households In Target Groups With Median Incomes At Or Above $70,000 DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas PRICE HOUSEHOLDS RANGE PER YEAR PERCENTAGE $150,000—$250,000 60 10.2% $200,000—$250,000 80 13.6% $250,000—$300,000 100 16.9% $300,000—$350,000 115 19.4% $350,000—$400,000 90 15.3% $400,000—$450,000 80 13.6% $450,000 and up 65 11.0% Total: 590 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 8 Target Groups For New Single-FamilyAttached For -Sale Households In Target Groups With Median Incomes At Or Above $70,000 Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas Empty Nesters Number of & Retirees Households Percentage Old Money 5 0.8% Urban Establishment 35 5.9% Small -Town Establishment 5 0.8% Cosmopolitan Elite 10 1.7% Suburban Establishment 10 1.7% Affluent Empty Nesters 5 0.8% New Empty Nesters 10 1.7% Cosmopolitan Couples 20 3.4% Middle -Class Move -Downs 15 2.5% No -Nest Suburbanites 15 2.5% Subtotal: 130 22.0% Traditional & Non -Traditional Families Unibox Transferees 25 4.2% Late -Nest Suburbanites 10 1.7% Full -Nest Suburbanites 25 4.2% Full -Nest Urbanites 75 12.7% Subtotal: 135 22.9% Younger Singles & Couples The Entrepreneuers 35 5.9% e -Types 85 14.4% The VIPs 30 5.1% Fast -Track Professionals 20 3.4% Upscale Suburban Couples 65 11.0% New Bohemians 70 11.9% Twentysomethings 20 3.4% Subtotal: Total Households: SOURCE: The Nielsen Company; Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. 325 55.1% 590 100.0% AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 35 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 For purposes of this analysis, the target residential mix and optimum market position for the Downtown Study Area have been established for a total of 1,850 higher -density dwelling units, a number which could have a significant impact on the establishment of Downtown as a neighborhood. The target residential mix of 1,850 units would be derived from market preferences, as follows: Target Residential Mix -1,850 Units Higher -Density Housing Units DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas PERCENT NUMBER HOUSING TYPE OF TOTAL OF UNITS Multi -family for -rent 53.1% 983 Multi -family for -sale 25.7% 475 Single-family attached for -sale 21.2% 392 Total 100.0% 1,850 SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. Based on projected market capture rates (see DOWNTOWN STUDY AREA ABSORPTION PROJECTIONS below), a total of 1,850 new market -rate dwelling units developed within the Downtown Study Area—in a mix of 983 rental lofts and apartments, 475 for -sale lofts and condominiums, and 392 townhouses and live -work units—could be absorbed in five to seven years. Therefore, established according to the housing preferences and the socio-economic and lifestyle characteristics of the target households, and the relevant residential context in the Corpus Christi market area, the general range of rents and prices for newly -developed market -rate residential units in the Downtown Study Area that could currently be sustained by the market is shown on the following page (see also Table 9 for greater detail): ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 36 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Rent, Price and Size Ranges DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas RENT/PRICE HOUSING TYPE RANGE MULTI -FAMILY FOR-RENT— Hard Lofts Soft Lofts Upscale Apartments MULTI -FAMILY FOR-SALE— Hard Lofts $150,000—$225,000 Soft Lofts $185,000—$285,000 $295,000—$425,000 $800—$1,500/month $750—$2,000/month $1,350—$2,500/month Upscale Condominiums SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED FOR-SALE— Townhouses / R owh o us es Live -Work $250,000—$335,000 $315,000—$365,000 SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. SIZE RANGE 500-1,100 sf 400-1,250 sf 700-1,500 sf 800-1,300 sf 900-1,450 sf 1,250-1,850 sf 1,300-1,850 sf 1,350-1,600 sf RENT/PRICE PER SQ. FT. $1.36—$1.60 psf $1.60—$1.88 psf $1.67—$1.93 psf $173—$188 psf $197—$206 psf $230—$236 psf $181—$192 psf $228—$233 psf The realization of the full market potential for ownership units, condominiums in particular, could be challenging, given the availability of development financing and mortgage underwriting by financial institutions, the disinterest on the part of large numbers of younger households in becoming owners, and the fact that many otherwise -qualified households, particularly current renters, lack the funds for a down payment. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 37 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Based on the unit types, sizes, configurations, and mix outlined in the optimum market position Table 9, the weighted average rents and prices for each of the housing types is as follows: Weighted Average Base Rent and Prices DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas HOUSING TYPE Multi -family for -rent Hard lofts Soft lofts Upscale apts. Multi -family for -sale Hard lofts Soft lofts Upscale condos. Single-family attached for -sale Townhouses/rowhouses Live -work WEIGHTED AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE BASE RENT/PRICES UNIT SIZE $1,374 per month $1,093 per month $1,275 per month $1,890 per month $263,316 $184,500 $226,000 $351,000 $304,022 $298,250 $343,500 SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. 842 sf 753 sf 780 sf 1,070 sf 1,238 1,015 1,115 1,505 1,597 1,613 1,493 WEIGHTED AVERAGE BASE RENT/PRICES PER SQ. FT. $1.63 $1.45 $1.63 $1.77 $213 $182 $203 $233 $190 $185 $230 on Proposed rents and prices are in year 2014 dollars, are exclusive of consumer options and upgrades, floor and/or location premiums, and cover the broad range of rents and prices that could be sustained by the market in the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area. Location will have a significant impact on rents and prices; projects situated within a short walking distance of high-value amenities, such as locations with views of the bay, the restaurants and shops on Chaparral Street, or one of the parks, will likely command rents and prices at the upper end of values. Those projects in less desirable locations, such as adjacent to the Interstate, are likely to command rents and prices at the lower end of values. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Table 9 Page 1 of 3 Optimum Market Position --1,850 New Market -Rate Dwelling Units Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Percent Number Annual Unit Unit Base Unit Rent/Price Market Housing Type Configuration Mix Rent/Price Size Per Sq. Ft. Capture 53.1% Multi -Family For -Rent 222 to 266 units 250 Hard Lofts Loft/ 1ba 25% $800 500 $1.60 Loft/ 1ba 30% $975 650 $1.50 Loft/ 1ba 25% $1,200 850 $1.41 Loft/ 1ba 20% $1,500 1,100 $1.36 Weighted averages: $1,093 753 $1.45 500 Soft Lofts Microloft/1ba 15% $750 400 $1.88 Studio/1ba 20% $900 550 $1.64 1br/1ba 25% $1,300 800 $1.63 2br/1ba 15% $1,450 900 $1.61 2br/2ba 15% $1,600 1,000 $1.60 2br/2ba/den 10% $2,000 1,250 $1.60 Weighted averages: $1,275 780 $1.63 233 Upscale Apartments 1br/1.5ba 25% $1,350 700 $1.93 1br/1.5ba/den 25% $1,750 950 $1.84 2br/2ba 20% $1,975 1,150 $1.72 2br/2.5ba/den 15% $2,300 1,350 $1.70 3br/2.5ba PH 15% $2,500 1,500 $1.67 Weighted averages: $1,890 1,070 $1.77 983 units Overall Weighted Averages: $1,374 842 $1.63 NOTE: Base rents /prices in year 2014 dollars and exclude floor and view premiums, options and upgrades. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 9 Page 2 of 3 Optimum Market Position --1,850 New Market -Rate Dwelling Units Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Percent Number Annual Unit Unit Base Unit Rent/Price Market Housing Type Configuration Mix Rent/Price Size Per Sq. Ft. Capture 25.7% Multi -Family For -Sale 72 to 86 units 100 Hard Lofts Loft/ 1ba 30% $150,000 800 $188 Loft/ 1ba 30% $175,000 950 $184 Loft/ 1ba 20% $210,000 1,150 $183 Loft/ 1ba 20% $225,000 1,300 $173 Weighted averages: $184,500 1,015 $182 200 Soft Lofts lbr/lba 25% $185,000 900 $206 lbr/lba/den 30% $205,000 1,000 $205 2br/2ba 25% $245,000 1,200 $204 2br/2ba/den 20% $285,000 1,450 $197 Weighted averages: $226,000 1,115 $203 175 Upscale Condominiums 2br/2ba 35% $295,000 1,250 $236 2br/2.5ba 30% $350,000 1,500 $233 3br/2ba 20% $395,000 1,700 $232 3br/2.5ba 15% $425,000 1,850 $230 475 units Weighted averages: $351,000 1,505 $233 Overall Weighted Averages: $263,316 1,238 $213 NOTE: Base rents /prices in year 2014 dollars and exclude floor and view premiums, options and upgrades. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. Table 9 Page 3 of 3 Optimum Market Position --1,850 New Market -Rate Dwelling Units Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Percent Number Annual Unit Unit Base Unit Rent/Price Market Housing Type Configuration Mix Rent/Price Size Per Sq. Ft. Capture 21.2% Single-FamilyAttached For -Sale 59 to 71 units 342 Townhouses/Rowhouses 2br/1.5ba 20% $250,000 1,300 $192 2br/2.5ba 30% $290,000 1,550 $187 2br/2.5ba 25% $310,000 1,700 $182 3br/2.5ba 25% $335,000 1,850 $181 Weighted averages: $298,250 1,613 $185 50 Live -Work Units lbr/1.5.5ba 25% $315,000 1,350 $233 500 sf work space lbr/1.5.5ba 45% $345,000 1,500 $230 on ground floor 2br / 1.5.5ba 30% $365,000 1,600 $228 392 units 1,850 Total Units Weighted averages: $343,500 1,493 $230 Overall Weighted Averages: $304,022 1,597 $190 NOTE: Base rents /prices in year 2014 dollars and exclude floor and view premiums, options and upgrades. SOURCE: Zimmerman / Volk Associates, Inc. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 41 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 DOWNTOWN STUDY AREA ABSORPTION PROJECTIONS After more than two decades' experience in scores of cities across the country, and in the context of the target market methodology, Zimmerman/Volk Associates has determined that, over the near term, those households that prefer new construction, rather than previously -occupied units, currently represent between 15 and 18 percent of the potential Downtown Corpus Christi rental market, and between 10 and 12 percent of the potential Downtown Corpus Christi for -sale market, assuming the production of appropriately -positioned new housing. (Until the collapse of the housing market in the fall of 2008, newly -constructed dwelling units comprised approximately 15 percent of all units sold in the nation; in 2011, that percentage had dropped to just 8.5 percent of all units sold, but has now risen to over 9.5 percent of all units sold.) Based on a 15 to 18 percent capture of the potential market for new rental housing, and a 10 to 12 percent capture of the potential market for new for -sale housing units, the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area should be able to absorb between 353 to 423 new market -rate housing units per year over the next five years as follows: Annual Capture of Market Potential DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas NUMBER OF CAPTURE NUMBER OF HOUSING TYPE HOUSEHOLDS RATE NEW UNITS Rental Multi -Family 1,480 15% to 18% 222 to 266 (lofts/apartments, leaseholder) For -Sale Multi -Family 715 10% to 12% 72 to 86 (lofts/apartments, condo/co-op ownership) For -Sale Single -Family Attached 590 10% to 12% 59 to 71 (townhouses/rowhouses, fee -simple ownership) Total 2,785 353 to 423 SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. These capture rates support the creation of between 1,765 and 2,115 new dwelling units within the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area over the next five to seven years. Over the longer term (beyond five to seven years), these capture rates are likely to increase as the Downtown neighborhood is established. Depending on whether there is a sufficient number of developable ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 42 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 sites, over 10 to 14 years, the market could likely support up to 5,000 new rental and for -sale housing units in the Downtown Study Area. Approximately 80 percent of the annual market capture of new units—or 178 to 213 new rental units, 58 to 69 new condominiums, and 47 to 57 new townhouse/live-work units, a total of 283 to 339 new market -rate units per year over the next five years—would be located in the area encompassed by zip code 78401; the remaining 20 percent of units— or 44 to 53 new rental units, 14 to 17 new condominiums, and 12 to 14 new townhouse/live-work units, a total of 70 to 84 new market -rate units—would be located in North Beach, the residential area included in zip code 78402. The market is constrained in North Beach due to the additional cost of development incurred by flooding issues. The impact of the substantial number of new units in the Downtown Study Area will be significant, by making the Study Area a much more desirable location for retailers and small businesses, by increasing the number of young people living in Downtown, and by providing greater housing and income diversity. NOTE: Target market capture rates are a unique and highly -refined measure of feasibility. Target market capture rates are not equivalent to—and should not be confused with—penetration rates or traffic conversion rates. The target market capture rate is derived by dividing the annual forecast absorption—in aggregate and by housing type—by the number of households that have the potential to purchase or rent new housing within a specified area in a given year. The penetration rate is derived by dividing the total number of dwelling units planned for a property by the total number of draw area households, sometimes qualified by income. The traffic conversion rate is derived by dividing the total number of buyers or renters by the total number of prospects that have visited a site. Because the prospective market for a location is more precisely defined, target market capture rates are higher than the more grossly -derived penetration rates. However, the resulting higher capture rates are well within the range of prudent feasibility. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 43 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 STUDY AREA BUILDING AND UNIT TYPES Building and unit types most appropriate for the Downtown Study Area include: • Courtyard Apartment Building: In new construction, an urban, pedestrian -oriented equivalent to conventional garden apartments. An urban courtyard building is three or more stories, often combined with non-residential uses on the ground floor. The building should be built to the sidewalk edge and, to provide privacy and a sense of security, the first floor should be elevated significantly above the sidewalk. 1111111111111111" 11111111001 111111111111111,1„ i;:0 1111,41,11.111111., t err 1111111111111 1,11. d 11111111.1111. 11. 1.111', d1111111 11111 l'1,111,11.111 , 11111111 HI 1,1 1111,111j11111111111111 odd. .1111.11,11111,11.11,1111111111,111 1 "tom Noir rye Gear idied Courtyard apartment building ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 44 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 • Loft Apartment Building: Either adaptive re -use of older warehouse or manufacturing buildings or a new -construction building type inspired by those buildings. The new - construction version usually has double -loaded corridors. Microlofts: Several cities across the country are changing minimum unit size requirements as part of a strategy to attract young knowledge workers. Millennial knowledge workers have responded positively to efficiency units as small as 220 square feet, often leasing out new micro loft projects within a matter of days. The City of Boston reduced the city's 450 -square -foot unit minimum to 350 square feet in a pilot program currently limited to the South Boston "Innovation District." As of February, 2014, 353 micro -units have been approved. The first property to market micro -units, the 38 -unit Factory 63, was completely leased within a week, reportedly all to renters who worked within a 10 -block radius of the property. Initial rents were between $1,200 a month for 337 square feet to $2,450 for 597 square feet; fully -leased. There is a waiting list for vacancies in the property where rents now start at $1,699. 1 !HIPPY INNOVATION LOFT A 1,201100 Si 01027..02210 Factory 63. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 45 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 San Francisco has reduced allowable minimum from 290 square feet to 220 square feet, but limited the change to 375 units until market impact has been assessed by the City's planning department; the concern is that the higher -profit micro units could reduce housing opportunities for households with children. The first completed project, SoMa Studios with 23 295 -square -foot units, was bulk leased for five years to the California College of the Arts. The same developer, Panoramic Interests, has a 160 -unit building planned with 220 -square - foot units slated when announced in 2012 with monthly rents between $1,300 and $1,500 ($5.90 to $6.80 per square foot); at the time the average San Francisco studio rent was $2,075 for 493 square feet, or $4.21 per square foot. The building will include substantial common space and parking for 240 bicycles but, other than a single car -share spot, no automobile parking. 1111101„,,„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„..„„d q��llur�ul�ti�i� *711• 1111111111111111111111111111) 1111111111111111111111111111wilipinflanisle 11;.1!1:111 .4'1 * q;WWieO VI twq''I„o III 11 l I�lllp �, I�illr9�um 111111111,11111111,11,11,11111111111 1111 111111111jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj11 _, wswi iCt vt 4 la cJinin r 147,001e Panoramic Interests. I' O TheLuoVa.twOF 4'r» bod5 ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 46 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 In New York City a pilot program accommodates units smaller than the current 400 -square - foot minimum. The first project, the 55 -unit My Micro NY, won the City's "adapt NYC" micro -unit competition. Units in the modular building range from 250 to 370 square feet; 40 percent will be affordable. Every floor will have a common area, and the building will include an attic garden, a ground -floor porch, a lounge and a fitness deck. API.#3A DAV 9'40 high'wait bw hind cough issel yrs prolrr �riw Alp kitchen counsel ainsel L down aftird ready ff or t(k coffee, APT. #3A NIGHT Orwell n oserr teed frrNruieddawdle. 1iiE ° ria rrurtte i",rki d dr, coffee L lul Brost Wheels retry aired o v ll„ My Micro NY. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 47 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Because of their small size and intricate layouts, small units are challenging to develop within existing buildings. A U.S. example of creating micro -units through the adaptive re -use of a non-residential building is the redevelopment of the historic, 1828 Arcade building in Providence, Rhode Island. The oldest surviving indoor mall in the nation, the Arcade closed when its three-story interior retail format was no longer economically viable. It re -opened in 2014 with ground -level retail and its two upper levels converted into 48 dwellings, including 38 micro units ranging from 225 to 450 square feet furnished with built-in beds, storage, banquette seating. In February, 2014, when half the units were completed and occupied, there was a 2,000 -name waiting list for the remaining units. Units are now fully leased at rents starting at $550 a month, $2.44 per square foot. 11.11111.1111111„„1111,1,11 1 1111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 111111 0 ,r0 0 000 II/Wa<Sy r w� fIx" IOWumNO 1111111'11,1 11 fir 1 )10 ir dr�aVJJ 7460 Arcade Building. 1111100000 ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Page 48 Hard Lofts: Unit interiors typically have high ceilings and commercial windows and are minimally finished (with minimal room delineations such as columns and fin walls), or unfinished (with no interior partitions except those for bathrooms). Soft Lofts: Unit interiors typically have high ceilings, are fully finished and partitioned into individual rooms. Units may also contain architectural elements reminiscent of "hard lofts," such as exposed ceiling beams and ductwork, concrete floors and industrial finishes, particularly if the building is an adaptive re -use of an existing industrial structure. NMI AOICip // //filiz %/7 nri fro ////7 Vii, /Aice, Hard loft 4410,,i„" Soft loft ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Page 49 Luxury Apartment: A more conventionally -finished apartment unit, typically with completely -partitioned rooms.—trim, interior doors, kitchens and baths are fitted out with higher -end finishes and fixtures. 110 111f,,1'1$51111111111 plllll��lllllll llliiililollu�4, I I)y I Illuuuuuuwiiu1),pw I 111 Illllllllllli111 .. ruurllml,uuo>iillN)!,,• 11 fiI�NIrIV��l7y'�ti�1511ti1111`tiIRYIIlYN1�fKfl�(dlh(ummiimipllllllll,„,, Il'"))11llllllll�pp I ���11i(iiil't�tt��� 1111111111111 ���IsliXi(VIImila111110lllllllll""' 111 i,: uu,l),J,Jlllum up uuummp IN llr, , �lul�ul;aV1P UI',IIlii61 lPluiv '111111' "1":111111iiiiim„1"'„ i1111 11'1" I '11111\1111w11111111111111 11 �� put 611110 111111111111111111111111111111111111111:„," ""' 1P1`a!Yl u dINVIfNlouw��ul�� �, , .111111111111.rr���;, 1puiIIIIIN1; Luxury apartment ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. ) AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 50 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 • Mansion Apartment Building: A two- to three-story flexible -use structure with a street facade resembling a large detached or attached house (hence, "mansion"). The attached version of the mansion, typically built to a sidewalk on the front lot line, is most appropriate for downtown locations. The building can accommodate a variety of uses—from rental or for -sale apartments, professional offices, any of these uses over ground -floor retail, a bed and breakfast inn, or a large single-family detached house—and its physical structure complements other buildings within a neighborhood. Parking behind the mansion buildings can be either alley -loaded, or front -loaded served by shared drives Mansion buildings should be strictly regulated in form, but flexible in use. However, flexibility in use is somewhat constrained by the handicapped accessibility regulations in both the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. li>Illlllifi>l>l>l>1111[ifl 1IIIlla1;1111111111111 f�rlfll? JJJJ��� '1J111111frrrmmmrmmmomm lffimprrr�r I�111111111111111111111111111li1 01101111111. 111111111111111 1111111M 0111„, mn '111,11111111111F: 111111111 11111 1111 �re W Gp/lgfmfIy�/( >,0`,/ rJl / i1PI im Ido�1�V�8�l�/ i14: oIIIII Mansion apartment building ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Page 51 • Mixed -Use Building: A pedestrian -oriented building, either attached or free-standing, with apartments and/or offices over flexible ground floor uses that can range from retail to office to residential. i111111111 11 mVV [44wg rrp,,; 1111111111111111111111111111111 [1;,,[,[,[[1„[,[1,['[111111111111111,1,[11,1,1,111111c1[1[1' ' 1111 1111 0 " " 1IlB11111111l11))) ...„.„1„,„„„1„„iiHrolhollrl IIS 1111111111111111111111111111111 11111 II Vii ° 11111 mm, Mixed-use buildings 111111111 ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 52 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 —SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED— • Townhouse: Similar in form to a conventional suburban townhouse except that the garage—either attached or detached—is located to the rear of the unit and accessed from an alley or auto court. Unlike conventional townhouses, urban townhouses conform to the pattern of streets, typically with shallow front -yard setbacks. kof tmorArlio :1•ViG�� If811111dllllllllllllluuuw °I)�rr° �'aa4nuou° pi�w�+ tda Y11110� wY,�iI�p�uu,V;!Vp�tlryWq�ija Townhouses ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Page 53 • Live -work is a unit or building type that accommodates non-residential uses in addition to, or combined with living quarters. The typical live -work unit is a building, either attached or detached, with a principal dwelling unit that includes space that can be used as office, retail, or studio space, or as an accessory dwelling unit. Regardless of the form they take, live -work units should be flexible in order to respond to economic, social and technological changes over time and to accommodate as wide as possible a range of potential uses. The unit configuration must also comply with the requirements of the Fair Housing Amendments Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Some of the most effective neighborhood revitalization efforts have incorporated live -work housing for artists and artisans. Perhaps the best example of arts -led revitalization has taken place on two nearly -adjacent blocks in downtown Providence, Rhode Island. In over decade an artists' non-profit, AS220, has re -developed a series of buildings with a mix of uses including eating and drinking establishments, retail uses, gallery and performance spaces, shared technical equipment, and work and residential studios. 1� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 uu uu 11 111 " uuuuuuuuuuII1 ' !gid A Ai 0.111.4.111. NON AS220 101�� w i I 1111 1400) ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Page 54 The second redevelopment was the restoration of The Dreyfus, an historic hotel building and former dormitory that now includes a bar and restaurant and 14 residential studios, 11 of which rent to income -qualified artists. The most recent redevelopment is called the Mercantile Block, which includes ground floor market -rate retail, the group's shared print shop, a floor of office space, and two floors with 22 apartments. The Dreyfus ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 55 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 METHODOLOGY The technical analysis of market potential for Downtown Corpus Christi included determination of the draw areas—based on the most recent migration data for Nueces County, and incorporating additional data from the 2012 American Community Survey for Nueces County and the City of Corpus Christi—as well as compilation of current residential rental and for -sale activity in the Corpus Christi market area. The evaluation of the city's market potential was derived from the target market analysis of households in the draw areas, and yielded: • The depth and breadth of the potential housing market by tenure (rental and ownership) and by type (apartments, attached and detached houses); and • The composition of the potential housing market (empty-nesters/retirees, traditional and non-traditional families, younger singles/couples). NOTE: The Appendix Tables referenced here are provided in a separate document. DELINEATIION OF THE DRAW AREAS (MIGRATIONANALYSIS)— Taxpayer migration data provide the framework for the delineation of the draw areas—the principal counties of origin for households that are likely to move to Nueces County and the City of Corpus Christi. These data are maintained at the county and "county equivalent" level by the Internal Revenue Service and provide a clear representation of mobility patterns. The migration data for the county has been supplemented by mobility data from the 2012 American Community Survey for the City of Corpus Christi. Appendix One, Table 1. Migration Trends Analysis of the most recent Nueces County migration data available from the Internal Revenue Service—from 2005 through 2009—shows that the county consistently lost households over the study period. (See Appendix One, Table 1.) Annual in -migration into the county rose from 7,015 households in 2006 (the lowest in -migrating total over the five years) to 7,575 households in 2008 (the highest in -migrating total), but falling ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 56 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 again to 7,155 households in 2009. Nearly 30 percent of the county's in -migration is from just five counties: the adjacent counties of San Patricio, Kleberg, and Jim Wells, as well as Bexar County (City of San Antonio) and Harris County (City of Houston). It is likely that migration data from 2010 and ensuing years will show increasing in -migration due both to the lessening of the impact of the Great Recession (household mobility typically drops during recessions) and the recent oil boom resulting from the development of the Eagle Ford Shale formation. Historically, although the numbers of households that move are likely to vary from year to year, migration patterns (the counties from which households are moving) typically remain consistent. Between 2005 and 2009, the number of households moving out of the county each year generally ranged between 7,685 out -migrating households in 2005 to 7,545 out -migrating households in 2009, with a study period peak of 7,730 out -migrating households in 2006. Net migration—the difference between the number of households that move into a given area and the number that move out—in the county ranged from a peak net loss of 715 households in 2006, to a net loss of only 60 households in 2008. In 2009, the net loss rose again to 390 households. Each year, the county loses households to Bexar and Harris Counties, but gains a small number of households adjacent San Patricio, Kleberg, and Jim Wells Counties. NOTE: Even though net migration provides insights into a county's historical ability to attract or retain households compared to other locations, it is those households likely to move into an area (gross in -migration) that represent that area's external market potential. Based on the migration data, then, the draw areas for Nueces County and the City of Corpus Christi have been delineated as follows: • The local (internal) draw area, covering households currently living within the Corpus Christi city limits; • The county (external) draw area, covering households currently living in the balance of Nueces County; • The regional (external) draw area, covering households with the potential to move to the City of Corpus Christi from the adjacent San Patricio, Kleberg, and Jim Wells ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 57 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Counties as well as Bexar County (City of San Antonio) and Harris County (City of Houston); and • The national (external) draw area, covering households with the potential to move to the City of Corpus Christi from all other U.S. counties. Migration Methodology: County -to -county migration is based on the year-to-year changes in the addresses shown on the population of returns from the Internal Revenue Service Individual Master File system. Data on migration patterns by county, or county equivalent, for the entire United States, include inflows and outflows. The data include the number of returns (which can be used to approximate the number of households), and the median and average incomes reported on the returns. 2014 TARGET MARKET CLASSIIFICATION OF CITY AND COUNTY HOUSEHOLDS— Geo-demographic data obtained from The Nielsen Company provide the framework for the categorization of households, not only by demographic characteristics, but also by lifestyle preferences and socio-economic factors. An appendix containing detailed descriptions of each of these target market groups is provided along with the study. The three main lifestages are: • Younger singles and couples, largely one- and two -person households with the head of household typically aged between 20 and 40, encompassing the leading edge of the Millennial generation, who were born between 1977 and 1996; • Families, comprising both "traditional" families (married couples with one or more children) and "non-traditional" families (a wide range of family households, from a single parent with one or more children, an adult caring for younger siblings, a grandparent with custody of grandchildren, to an unrelated, same-sex couple with children), primarily Generation X, born between 1965 and 1976; and ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 58 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 • Empty nesters and retirees, largely one- and two -person households with the head of household typically aged over 50, primarily encompassing the Baby Boom generation, born between 1946 and 1964, as well as earlier generations. Appendix One, Tables 2 and 3. Target Market Classifications An estimated 118,660 households live in the City of Corpus Christi in 2014. (Reference Appendix One, Table 2.) Over 46 percent of the city's households can be characterized as empty nesters and retirees, 35.1 percent can be characterized as traditional and non-traditional families, and the remaining 18.5 percent can be characterized as younger singles and couples. Median income within the city is estimated at $45,400, 12 percent lower than the national median of $51,600. Median value of owner -occupied dwellings within the city is estimated at $119,700, over 34 percent less than the national median of $182,100. Nueces County is estimated to comprise 130,735 households in 2014. (See Appendix One, Table 3.) Approximately 47.6 percent of county households can be characterized as empty nesters and retirees, 35.4 percent can be characterized as traditional and non-traditional families, and the remaining 17.1 percent can be characterized as younger singles and couples. County median income is estimated at $45,000, $400 less than the city median. Median value of owner -occupied dwellings within the county is estimated at $116,300, $3,400 below the city median. Target Market Methodology: The proprietary target market methodology developed by Zimmerman/Volk Associates is an analytical technique, using the PRIZM NE household clustering system, that establishes the optimum market position for residential development of any property—from a specific site to an entire political jurisdiction—through cluster analysis of households living within designated draw areas. In contrast to conventional supply/demand analysis—which is based on supply-side dynamics and baseline demographic projections—target market analysis establishes the optimum market position ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 59 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 derived from the housing and lifestyle preferences of households in the draw area and within the framework of the local housing market context, even in locations where no close comparables exist. Clusters of households (usually between 10 and 15) are grouped according to a variety of significant "predictable variables," ranging from basic demographic characteristics, such as income qualification and age, to less -frequently considered attributes known as "behaviors," such as mobility rates, lifestage, and lifestyle patterns. Mobility rates detail how frequently a household moves from one dwelling unit to another. Lifestage denotes what stage of life the household is in, from initial household formation (typically when a young person moves out of his or her parents' household into his or her own dwelling unit), through family formation (typically, marriage and children) to retirement (typically, no longer employed) . Lifestyle patterns reflect the ways households choose to live, e.g., an urban lifestyle includes residing in a dwelling unit in a city, most likely high-density, and implies the ability to walk to more locations than a suburban lifestyle, which is most likely lower -density and typically requires automobile ownership to get to non-residential locations. Zimmerman/Volk Associates has refined the analysis of these household clusters through the correlation of more than 500 data points related to housing preferences and consumer and lifestyle characteristics. As a result of this process, Zimmerman/Volk Associates has identified 41 target market groups with median incomes that enable most of the households within each group to qualify for market -rate housing. The most affluent of the 41 groups can afford the most expensive new ownership units; the least prosperous are candidates for the least expensive existing rental apartments. Another 25 groups have median incomes such that most of the households require housing finance assistance. Once the draw areas for a property have been defined, then—through field investigation, analysis of historic migration and development trends, and employment and commutation patterns—the households within those areas are quantified using the target market methodology. The potential ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 60 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 market for new dwelling units is then determined by the correlation of a number of factors— including, but not limited to: household mobility rates; median incomes; lifestyle characteristics and housing preferences; the location of the study area; and the current supply-side context. DETERMINATION OF MARKET POTENTIAL FOR THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI (MOBILITY ANALYSIS)— The mobility tables, individually and in summaries, indicate the number and type of households that have the potential to move within or to the City of Corpus Christi over the next five years. The total number from each county is derived from historic migration trends; the number of households from each group is based on each group's mobility rate. Appendix One, Table 4. Internal Mobility (Households Moving Within the City of Corpus Christi)— Zimmerman/Volk Associates uses U.S. Bureau of the Census data from the American Community Survey, combined with data from the Nielsen Company, to determine the number of households in each target market group that will move from one residence to another within a specific jurisdiction in a given year (internal mobility). Using these data, Zimmerman/Volk Associates has determined that an average of 14,475 households currently living in the City of Corpus Christi have the potential to move from one residence to another—rental or ownership, new or resale—within the city each year over the next five years. Approximately 47.7 percent of these households are likely to be traditional and non-traditional families (in all market groups); 38.9 percent are younger singles and couples (in all but one group); and the remaining 13.4 percent are empty nesters and retirees (in all groups). Appendix One, Table 5. External Mobility (Households Moving to the City of Corpus Christi from the Balance of Nueces County)— The same sources of data are used to determine the number of households in each target market group that will move from one area to another within the same county. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 61 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 The data shows that an average of 1,315 households, currently living in the balance of Nueces County, have the potential to move from a residence in the county to a residence in the City of Corpus Christi each year over the next five years. More than 58 percent of these households are likely to be traditional and non-traditional families (in six market groups); 33.5 percent are empty nesters and retirees (in 12 groups); and the remaining 8.4 percent are younger singles and couples (in one group). Appendix One, Tables 6 and 7; Appendix Two, Tables 1 through 5. External Mobility (Households Moving to the City of Corpus Christi from Outside Nueces County)— These tables determine the number of households in each target market group living in each draw area county and the balance of the United States that are likely to move to the City of Corpus Christi each year over the next five years (through a correlation of Nielsen data, U.S. Bureau of the Census data, and the Internal Revenue Service migration data). Appendix One, Table 8. Annual Market Potential for the City of Corpus Christi— This table summarizes Appendix One, Tables 4 through 7. The numbers in the Total column on page one indicate the depth and breadth of the potential market for new and existing dwelling units in the City of Corpus Christi annually over the next five years originating from households currently living in the draw areas. An average of 23,645 households have the potential to move within or to the City of Corpus Christi each year over the next five years. Traditional and non-traditional families are likely to account for 45.4 percent of these households (in all of Zimmerman/Volk Associates' target market family groups); 38.5 percent are likely to be younger singles and couples (in all of the younger target market groups); and the remaining 16.1 percent are likely to be empty nesters and retirees (in all of the empty nest/retiree groups). As derived from the migration and mobility analyses, then, the distribution of the draw areas as a percentage of the potential market for new or existing dwelling units in the City of Corpus Christi is outlined on the following page (see again Appendix One, Table 8): ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 62 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Potential Housing Market by Draw Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas City of Corpus Christi: 61.2% Balance of Nueces County: 5.6% San Patricio, Bexar, Harris, Kleberg, and Jim Wells Counties: 8.3% Balance of US: 24.9% Total: 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. DETERMINATION OF THE POTENTIAL MARKET FOR THE DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA— The total potential market for new market -rate housing units within the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area includes the same draw areas. Zimmerman/Volk Associates uses U.S. Bureau of the Census data, combined with Nielsen data, to determine which target market groups, as well as how many households within each group, are likely to move to the Downtown over a five-year period. Appendix One, Tables 9 through 11. Market Potential for the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area— As derived by the target market methodology, an average of 3,405 households have the potential to rent or purchase new market -rate housing units in the Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area each year over the next five years. (Reference Appendix One, Table 09.) Over 60 percent of these households are likely to be younger singles and couples (in seven market groups); another 23.3 percent are likely to be empty nesters and retirees (in 11 groups); and 16.4 percent are likely to be traditional and non-traditional families (in four groups). The distribution of the draw areas as a percentage of the market for the Downtown Study Area is shown on the following page: ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 63 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Market Potential by Draw Area DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI STUDY AREA City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas City of Corpus Christi: 60.8% Balance of Nueces County: 1.0% San Patricio, Bexar, Harris, Kleberg, and Jim Wells Counties: 6.6% Balance of US: 31.6% Total: 100.0% SOURCE: Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc., 2014. The 3,405 draw area households that have the potential to move to the Downtown Study Area each year over the next five years have been categorized by tenure propensities to determine renter/owner ratios. Approximately 43.5 percent of these households (1,480 households) comprise the potential market for new market -rate rentals. The remaining 56.5 percent (or 1,925 households) comprise the market for new market -rate for -sale (ownership) housing units. (Reference Appendix One, Table 10.) Of these 1,925 households, 37.2 percent (or 715 households) comprise the market for new multi- family for -sale units (condominium apartments and lofts). Another 30.6 percent (620 households) comprise the market for new attached single-family (townhouse/rowhouse/live-work) for -sale units. The remaining 32.2 percent (or 620 households) comprise the market for all ranges and densities of new single-family detached houses. (Reference Appendix One, Table 11.) —Target Market Data— Target market data are based on the Nielsen (formerly Claritas) PRIZM geo-demographic system, modified and augmented by Zimmerman/Volk Associates as the basis for its proprietary target market methodology. Target market data provides number of households by cluster aggregated into the three main demographic categories—empty nesters and retirees; traditional and non-traditional families; and younger singles and couples. Zimmerman/Volk Associates' target market classifications are updated periodically to reflect the slow, but relentless change in the composition of American households. Because of the nature of ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 64 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 geo-demographic segmentation, a change in household classification is directly correlated with a change in geography, i.e.—a move from one neighborhood condition to another. However, these changes of classification can also reflect an alteration in one of three additional basic characteristics: • Age; • Household composition; or • Economic status. Age, of course, is the most predictable, and easily -defined of these changes. Household composition has also been relatively easy to define; recently, with the growth of non-traditional households, however, definitions of a family have had to be expanded and parsed into more highly -refined segments. Economic status remains clearly defined through measures of annual income and household wealth. A change in classification is rarely induced by a change in just one of the four basic characteristics. This is one reason that the target household categories are so highly refined: they take in multiple characteristics. Even so, there are some rough equivalents in household types as they move from one neighborhood condition to another. There is, for example, a strong correlation between the Suburban Achievers and the Urban Achievers; a move by the Suburban Achievers to the urban core can make them Urban Achievers, if the move is accompanied by an upward move in socio-economic status. In contrast, Suburban Achievers who move up socio -economically, but remain within the metropolitan suburbs may become Fast -Track Professionals or The VIPs. Household Classification Methodology: Household classifications were originally based on the Claritas PRIZM geo-demographic segmentation system that was established in 1974 and then replaced by PRIZM NE in 2005. The revised household classifications are based on PRIZM NE which was developed through unique classification and regression trees delineating 66 specific clusters of American households. The system is now accurate to the individual household level, adding self-reported and list -based household data to geo- demographic information. The process applies hundreds of demographic variables to nearly 10,000 "behaviors." ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL Page 65 The Downtown Corpus Christi Study Area City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas October, 2014 Over the past 26 years, Zimmerman/Volk Associates has augmented the PRIZM cluster systems for use within the company's proprietary target market methodology specific to housing and neighborhood preferences, with additional algorithms, correlation with geo-coded consumer data, aggregation of clusters by broad household definition, and unique cluster names. For purposes of this study, only those households in groups with median incomes of $50,000 or more are included in the tables. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908-735-6336 info@ZVA.cc • www.ZVA.cc Research & Strategic Analysis ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS— Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the data contained within this analysis. Demographic and economic estimates and projections have been obtained from government agencies at the national, state, and county levels. Market information has been obtained from sources presumed to be reliable, including developers, owners, and/or sales agents. However, this information cannot be warranted by Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc. While the methodology employed in this analysis allows for a margin of error in base data, it is assumed that the market data and government estimates and projections are substantially accurate. Absorption scenarios are based upon the assumption that a normal economic environment will prevail in a relatively steady state during development of the subject property. Absorption paces are likely to be slower during recessionary periods and faster during periods of recovery and high growth. Absorption scenarios are also predicated on the assumption that the product recommendations will be implemented generally as outlined in this report and that the developer will apply high-caliber design, construction, marketing, and management techniques to the development of the property. Recommendations are subject to compliance with all applicable regulations. Relevant accounting, tax, and legal matters should be substantiated by appropriate counsel. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908 735-6336 www.ZVA.cc • info@ZVA.cc Research & Strategic Analysis RIGHTS AND STUDY OWNERSHIP— Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc. retains all rights, title and interest in the methodology and target market descriptions contained within this study. The specific findings of the analysis are the property of the client and can be distributed at the client's discretion. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC., 2014 W-ZH A, LLC OFFICE, RETAIL, AND HOTEL MARKET ASSESSMENT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Submitted By: W-ZHA, LLC September, 2014 W-ZH , LLC INTRODUCTION This report provides a baseline analysis of current conditions and recent trends in the Corpus Christi marketplace. Key market indicators and trends are presented for the office, retail and hotel markets. Market opportunities are identified, on a preliminary basis, given 10 -year population and employment projections. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City of Corpus Christi's population has grown rapidly recently with over 40,000 more residents and approximately 20,000 more households today than there were in 2010. • With 80 percent of the region's job, City of Corpus Christi is the employment hub of the Coastal Bend region. • Like the population, employment has grown in Corpus Christi and the City continues to enjoy an unemployment rate below the state and national average. • Corpus Christi's office market is quite weak with relatively high vacancy and low rents. Growth in the regional economy has had relatively little impact on the office market. Future employment growth among industries that typically occupy office space will likely reduce vacancy over the next decade. The prospects for new general office construction are constrained average rents that are not sufficient to cover construction costs. • Corpus Christi is a shopping destination for the region. It does not appear, however, that tourists are contributing signficantly to retail sales. The data do indicate that the tourisst market greatly contributes to eating and drinking sales in the City. Population growth over the next decade will result in demand for approximately one million square feet of new retail and eating and drinking development in the City. • With an overall occupancy rate of 65 percent and average revenue per available room over $70.00, the midscale and upscale hotel market is healthy. The hotel market benefits from a robust business and tourist market. Employment growth alone over the next decade will generate demand for an additional 300 to 500 rooms in Corpus Christi. -2- W-ZH , LLC ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK Demographics The Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area consists of Nueces, Aransas and San Patricio counties. Most Populous Metropolitan Areas State of Texas 2010 Metro Area Dallas -Fort Worth - Arlington Houston - Sugar Land - Baytown San Antonio - New Braunfels Austin -Round Rock- San Marcos El Paso - Las Cruces McAllen - Edinburg - Mission Corpus Christi Brownsville - Harlingen Killeen - Temple - Fort Hood Beaumont - Port Arthur TX Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 US Rank Source: US Census; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]Sheet4 4 5 25 35 58 68 114 126 127 132 2010 Population 6,526,548 6,086,538 2,142,508 1,716,289 1,045,180 774,769 428,185 406,220 405,300 388,745 The Corpus Christi Metro Area is the 7th most populous Metro Area in Texas. In terms of total population the Metro Area ranked 114th in the Country. Population and Households Select Areas 2014 Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Metro Nueces County Corpus Christi City Population City Share 590,567 444,428 353,424 318,033 54% 72% 90% 100% Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]exist Households City Share 214,141 164,746 130,736 118,651 55% 72% 91% 100% The Coastal Bend region consists of Aransas, Bee, Brooks, Duval, Jim Wells, Kenedy, Kieberg, Live Oak, McMullen, Nueces, Refugio, and San Patricio counties. The Coastal Bend region contains approximately -3- W-ZH , LLC 444,000 people. Nueces County is the largest county in the region - it accounts for 60 percent of Coastal Bend's population. Most Populous Cities State of Texas 2013 City Houston San Antonio - New Braunfels Dallas Austin Fort Worth El Paso Arlington Corpus Christi Plano Laredo TX Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Source: US Census; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]city r 2013 Est. Population 2,195,914 1,409,019 1,257,676 885,400 792,727 674,433 379,577 316,381 274,409 248,142 Corpus Christi is the 8th largest city in Texas. The U.S. Census estimated the City's population to be approximately 316,400 in 2013. Claritas, Inc. estimates that the City's current population is approximately 318,000. Population and Household Trends Texas, Coastal Bend, Corpus Christi Metro, Nueces County, Corpus Christi City 2000, 2010, 2014 [ Population Change 2000-2010 2010-2014 2000-2014 2000 2010 2014 # 1 Avg Ann # 1 Avg Ann # 1 Avg Ann Texas 1.9% 1.5% 1.8% Coastal Bend 549,082 571,987 590,567 22,905 0.4% 18,580 0.8% 41,485 0.5% Corpus Christi Metro 403,279 428,185 444,428 24,906 0.6% 16,243 0.9% 41,149 0.7% Nueces County 313,641 340,223 353,424 26,582 0.8% 13,201 1.0% 39,783 0.9% Corpus Christi City 277,552 305,215 318,033 27,663 1.0% 12,818 1.0% 40,481 1.0% [ Households Change 2000-2010 2010-2014 2000-2014 2000 2010 2014 # 1 Avg Ann # 1 Avg Ann # 1 Avg Ann Texas 1.9% 1.5% 1.8% Coastal Bend 189,303 205,406 214,141 16,103 0.8% 8,735 1.0% 24,838 0.9% Corpus Christi Metro 141,591 157,019 164,746 15,428 1.0% 7,727 1.2% 23,155 1.1% Nueces County 110,364 124,587 130,736 14,223 1.2% 6,149 1.2% 20,372 1.2% Corpus Christi City 98,922 112,843 118,651 13,921 1.3% 5,808 1.3% 19,729 1.3% Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]pop trend -4- W-ZH , LLCI The City of Corpus Christi has grown faster than its region over the last fourteen years. The City's households grew at an average rate of 1.3 percent per year between 2000 and 2014. 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Households by Lifestage Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area and Corpus Christi City 2014 Younger Years Source: Claritas; W-ZHA Fami y Life Mature Years IIIIIIIIIIII Metro Area City As compared to the Metro Area, the City of Corpus Christi contains a higher share of households that are young and childless. Like the Metro Area, almost half of the City's households are in their "mature years" (older households without children at home). One- and Two -Person Households Coastal Bend, CC MSA, Nueces County, CC City 2014 Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Metro Nueces County Corpus Christi City Total 121,181 93,698 73,841 67,666 Share 57% 57% 56% 57% Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]proj by hshld type Over half of the City's households are one- and two -person households. This is the case throughout the Coastal Bend region. -5- W-ZH , LLC Population Projections Texas, Coastal Bend, Nueces County, Corpus Christi City 2014, 2020, 2024, 2030 Texas Coastal Bend Nueces County Corpus Christi City 2014 26,668,922 590,567 353,424 318,033 Population 2020 29, 510,184 614,790 374,157 335,657 Source: Texas Water Development Board; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]pop proj Extrapolated 2024 29, 510,184 633,185 387,167 347,328 2030 33,628,653 661,815 407,534 365,599 2014-2024 Change 2,841,262 42,618 33,743 29,295 0.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% According to projections from the Texas Water Development Board, the population growth rate will be slower in the next decade than it was from 2000 to 2014. The State's population is projected to grow 0.7 percent per year over the next ten years. The City's growth rate is projected to be 0.6 percent per year over this same time period. Median Income Select Areas 2014 Texas Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Metro Nueces County Corpus Christi City 2014 $50,464 $44,285 $45,749 $44,979 $45,408 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[household trend.xlsx]median income The region's median household income is below the Texas average. The median income among City households is $45,400. -6- W-ZH Ar LLCI Median Household Income by Census Tract Corpus Christi City 2014 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA [Medan Income! 39. MINaer ,000,2 n, 4.03 .00we) +9 7evoan,nFi apwe The map illustrates median household income by census tract. Incomes are high on Padre Island and in the South Side neighborhood. - 7 - Z H Ar LOCI Employment As of 2013, there were 187,770 jobs in the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area. City Share of Metropolitan Area Employment Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area and Corpus Christi City 2011 ....11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Source: US Census; W-ZHA Almost 80 percent of these jobs are located in the City of Corpus Christi. Top Ten Employers Corpus Christi Metro Area 2012 Business Corpus Christi Army Depot Corpus Christi ISD CHRISTUS Spohn Health System H.E.B City of Corpus Christi Naval Air Station - Corpus Christi Kiewit Offshore Services Bay, LTD Driscoll Children's Hospital Del Mar College Type of Product - Service Helicopter Repair School District Hospital Grocery City Government Flight Training Offshore Rig Manufacturer Industrial Construction Hospital Junior College Source: Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]employers Civilian Employment 6,500 5,178 5,144 5,000 3,171 2,822 2,200 2,100 1,800 1,542 -8- W-ZH , LLCI There are large public sector and private sector employers in the Corpus Christi Metro Area. Health, energy and the military play a major role in the Corpus Christi economy. 20.0% m 18.0% . c 16.0% 14.0% 2 12.0% i— 10.0% w0 8.0% d 6.0% s 4.0% 'n 2.0% 0.0% Employment by Industry Texas and the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 2013 1 i 1 ob.' \oE goo ae ae. .c;' ,o .,e, e5 a ,`r. •c•\ ey .c'`" Gera `t`\G,G\ eta \•ta t,Z,' t�`a, G``JC� C�, , seem . `' se t.�e e�oEt Loco a��s�a o\e a\ sera ae „, ., . ef,`, ATE ahoy ret- Do e ta\� �r �t �\ ''Z'6 'k • ao �� eat` (5' �o'C.. G t \\a <a �e� Texas Metro Area Source: Texas Workforce Commission; W-ZHA Compared to Texas, the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area has a higher share of its employment in the mining, construction, health, and tourism industries. According to the Convention and Visitors Bureau, Corpus Christi is the 5th most popular tourist destination in Texas. An estimated 7.1 million visitors spent over 18 million days in the Corpus Christi area in 2011. Approximately 43 percent of Corpus Christi's tourism is nature tourism. -9- W-ZH , LLC Relative Employment Performance (1995 = 100) United States and Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 1995 — 2013 L!1 lD N 00 cn O M tJ lD N 00 cn O M a cn cn Cn cn O O O O O O O O O O a Cn Cn Cn Cn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c -I c -I c -I c -I c -I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US E1°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°1°Corpus Christi Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA The Corpus Christi Metroplitan economy is expanding at a rapid pace and employment is at an all time high. Growth is being driven by drilling in the Eagle Ford Shale and rising exports from the Port of Corpus Christi. Unemployment Rate US, Texas, Corpus Christi Metro, Corpus Christi City April, 2014 United States Texas Corpus Christi Metro Corpus Christi City Unemployment Rate 5.9% 4.7% 4.6% 4.2% Source: Texas Workforce Commission; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]current unemployment The City's unemployment rate is well below the State and National average. Corpus Christi has maintained a low unemployment rate, while it's labor force has been expanding rapidly. - 10 - W-ZH Ar LLCI Unemployment Rate Texas, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area and Corpus Christi City 2000-2013 9.0% 8.0% QJ 7.0% co ix 6.0% c ' 5.0% 1 G 4.0% a E 3.0% c • 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% iilryn5m1111111 O c -I N M ▪ tJ LD N 00 Ol O c -I N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Texas Corpus Christi Metro Source: Texas Workforce Commission; W-ZHA '"" 'Corpus Christi City As illustrated in the graph above, the City's unemployment rate has been consistently below the Metropolitan Area's and Texas' unemployment rate. Employment Trends by Major Industry Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 2003, 2008, 2013 Industry Natural Resources and Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Education Health Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Total Government Total Non -Agricultural Employment 2003 2.85 14.35 11.87 5.03 19.01 5.34 2.73 7.77 16.02 0.60 23.86 18.61 6.70 31.90 166.65 Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]Sheetl Jobs (000's) 2008 4.88 17.69 11.08 5.90 21.13 5.55 2.47 8.18 16.61 0.74 26.83 20.78 7.15 33.54 182.52 2013 7.48 16.40 9.77 5.90 20.77 7.01 2.08 7.77 15.69 0.86 28.95 24.14 7.73 33.24 187.77 000's Chng 2003-08 Chng 2008-13 2.0 3.3 (0, 0.9 2.1 0.2 (0.3) 0.4 0.6 0.1 3.0 2.2 0.5 1.6 15.9 21.3% 2.7% - 3.8% 3.2% 1.8% 5.6% - 5.4% 0.0% - 0.4% 7.3% 3.9% 5.3% 2.9% 0.8% 2.4% 2.6 )1,3) 0.0 )0.4) 1.5 )0.4) )0.4) )l09) 0.1 2.1 3.4 0.6 )0.3) 5.3 8.9% - 1.5% - 2.5% 0.0% - 0.3% 4.8% - 3.4% - 1.0% - 1.1% 3.1% 1.5% 3.0% 1.6% - 0.2% 0.6% Chng 2003-13 4.6 2.0 (2.1) 0.9 1.8 1.7 (0.7) 0.0 (0.3) 0.3 5.1 5.5 1.0 1.3 21.1 Av Ann 10.1% 1.3% - 1.9% 1.6% 0.9% 2.8% - 2.7% 0.0% - 0.2% 3.6% 2.0% 2.6% 1.4% 0.4% 1.2% The greatest job gains since 2003 have occurred in the leisure and hospitality, health and mining industries. Employment the natural resources and mining industry grew by an average of 10 percent per year from 2003 to 2013. This was growth was driven by Eagle Ford Shale. W-ZH , LLC Between 2003 and 2013 jobs were lost in industries that typically occupy office space (information, financial activities, and professional and business service industries). Approximately, 1,000 jobs were lost in these industries during this timeframe. 150 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 Relative Employment Performance Projection (1995 = 100) United States and Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 1995 — 2023 Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA According to projections from Moody's Analytics, a national economics firm, the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area will continue to outperform the United States in employment growth. Moody's outlook for Corpis Christi is optimistic as a result of output growth from Eagle Ford Shale and port infrastrucure expansion. These drivers are also expected to spur jobs gains in construction and professional services. Associated income growth is also expected to drive other industries such as retail and leisure and hospitality. - 12 - W-ZH A, LLCI Employment Trends by Major Industry Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 2013, 2018, 2023 Industry Natural Resources and Mining 7.48 9.66 10.50 2.2 7.0% 0.8 1.7% 3.0 3.4% Construction 16.40 20.17 19.35 3.8 3.4% (0,3) -0.8% 2.9 1.7% Manufacturing 9.77 9.81 9.48 0.0 -0.6% (11.3) -0.7% (0,3) -0.3% Wholesale Trade 5.90 6.27 6.18 0.4 0.9% (0.1) -0.3% 0.3 0.5% Retail Trade 20.77 21.63 22.24 0.9 1.4% 0.6 0.6% 1.5 0.7% Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities 7.01 7.76 7.68 0.7 1.8% (11.1) -0.2% 0.7 0.9% Information 2.08 2.12 2.12 0.0 0.5% 0.0 0.1% 0.0 0.2% Financial Activities 7.77 8.55 8.77 0.8 2.5% 0.2 0.5% 1.0 1.2% Professional and Business Services 15.69 16.89 17.93 1.2 2.7% 1.0 1.2% 2.2 1.3% Education 0.86 0.98 1.07 0.1 4.5% 0.1 1.6% 0.2 2.2% Health 28.95 34.03 38.41 5.1 5.8% 4.4 2.4% 9.5 2.9% Leisure and Hospitality 24.14 29.38 32.56 5.2 6.2% 3.2 2.1% 8.4 3.0% Other Services 7.73 8.74 9.26 1.0 3.7% 0.5 1.2% 1.5 1.8% Total Government 33.24 35.37 36.67 2.1 2.0% 1.3 0.7% 3.4 1.0% Total Non -Ag Employment 187.77 211.37 222.21 23.6 3.4% 10.8 1.0% 34.4 1.7% Office -Inclined Employment Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA F:\8000s, m isc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]proj 27.31 29.54 30.91 2.2 2.5% 1.4 0.9% 3.6 1.2% The industries forecasted to experience the greatest job gains are the health industry and leisure and hospitality. OFFICE MARKET Existing Conditions and Trends Office Market Supply Corpus Christi Office Market 4th Quarter 2013 Building Class Class A Class B Class C Sq. Ft. 938,000 6,579,000 2,210,000 Total 9,727,000 Source: CoStar Group and Burbach Associates; Texas Real Estate Center at Texas A & M University, "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview data"; W-ZHA According to data provided by the CoStar Group and Burbach & Associates, there are currently 9.7 million square feet of office space in the Corpus Christie market. - 13 - W-ZH , LLCI Office Supply Corpus Christi Market 4th Quarter 2013 I II 11111111111111111 Only 10 percent of the office supply is classified as Class A office space. Almost 70 percent of the office supply is classified as Class B office space. Office Sub -Market Statistics Corpus Christi Office Market 4th Quarter 2013 Sub -Market Central Business District South Side Mid -City West Side Other* Sq. Ft. 4,497,000 46% 2,213,000 23% 1,486,000 15% 658,000 7% 873,000 9% Total 9,727,000 100% * The data from the "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview" is not consistent. The "Other" category was created to compensate for total supply discrepancies. Source: CoStar Group and Burbach Associates; Texas Real Estate Center at Texas A & M University, "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview Data"; W-ZHA - 14 - W-ZH A, LLCI The Central Business District (CBD) is the largest sub -market containing slightly less than half of all of the office space in the Corpus Christi market. The South Side is the second largest sub -market with 2.2 million square feet. The largest office buildings are located in the Uptown and Central Business District. Many of these buildings are struggling — they have a lot of available space. The three Class A buildings listing space for - lease on Loopnet, a commercial property listing service, have a combined vacancy rate of 24 percent — over 230,000 square feet of Class A space is available for -lease. Office Space For -Lease Corpus Christi Downtown and Uptown Market Fall, 2014 Building Name One Shoreline Plaza Frost Bank Plaza Tower II Address 800 N Shoreline Blvd 802 N Carancahua St 555 N Carancahua St Class Size (SF) A 363,300 A 310,858 A 289,462 Available SF 86,465 58,925 86,090 24% 19% 30% Bank of America Building 500 North Shoreline B 350,000 50,000 14% Bayview Tower 400 Mann St B 120,000 10,000 8% Furman Plaza 418 Peoples St B 25,428 8,530 34% AEP Building 539 N Carancahua St B 280,744 11,393 4% American Bank Building 711 & 811 N. Carancahua St B 234,270 31,530 13% Park Tower 710 Buffalo St B 79,070 22,642 29% Source: Loopnet; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[office.xlsx]Sheet3 The table above summarizes the office space listed for -lease by Loopnet in Corpus Christi's Downtown and Uptown areas as of fall, 2014. - 15 - W-ZH , LLC Select Buildings Asking Rent Corpus Christi Office Market June, 2014 Building Name One Shoreline Plaza Frost Bank Plaza Tower II Bank of America Building Bayview Tower Furman Plaza AEP Building American Bank Building Park Tower Sun Plaza Century South New York Life Congressional Plaza Address Class Uptown and Downtown Area 800 N Shoreline Blvd 802 N Carancahua St 555 N Carancahua St 500 North Shoreline 400 Mann St 418 Peoples St 539 N Carancahua St 711 & 811 N. Carancahua St 710 Buffalo St South Side 5656 S. Staples St 400 South Padre Island Drive 5350 S. Staples St 6262 Weber Rd Source: Loopnet; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[office.xlsx]Sheetl Asking Rent A $20.00 - $24.00 A $17.21 A $14.75 B $15.00 B $13.25 B $14.00 $16.50 B $14.50 B $13.00 B $8.40 $10.49 A B B B Office Market Rents Corpus Christi Office Market 2011 Low Downtown Office $17.00 $9.00 Class A Class B Suburban Office Class A Class B High $22.00 $13.00 $13.00 $17.00 $9.00 $13.00 Source: NAI Cravey Real Estate Services; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[office.xlsx]Sheet6 Effective Avg Rent $19.50 $11.00 $15.00 $11.00 $17.00 $15.00 $15.50 $15.00 - 16 - W-ZH , LLC Rents are quite low in Corpus Christi. The average rent for Class A office in the CBD is less than $20 per square foot. It is hard to develop new office product with such low rents. Office Rent Corpus Christi Market 2006 - 2014 S11,00 -- S1&00 S12« S1 0- 2006 200 2008 2 2010 2011 2 2 2 t 2014 Metre Coq; n C Source: Loopnet; W-ZHA As the chart above illustrates average rents have increased within the last year. Even with this increase, however, average office rent is still very low in Corpus Christi. Low rents will deter office investment as tenants are reluctant to pay the premium necessary to support new construction. The more recent office development has occurred in the South Side office sub -market. With its access and its residential growth and retail offerings, South Side is a desirable office location. There has not been an office building developed in the Central Business District or Downtown for 20 years. - 17 - W-ZH Ar LLC Office Prospects General Office The primary market for general office space are businesses in the information, financial activities, professional and business services industries as well as religious, grantmaking, civic and professional organizations. In the Corpus Christi Metro Area, office -inclined industries are projected to grow by approximately 2,200 jobs by 2018 and another 1,400 jobs between 2018 and 2023. Employment Trends by Major Industry Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 2013, 2018, 2023 Office -Inclined Industry Information Finance and Insurance Real Estate Prof, Sci, Tech Services & Mgmt of Companies Administrative, Support, Waste Management, & Remediation Services Religious, Grantmaking, Civic, & Professional Organizations Total Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[economy emp (Recovered).xls]Sheet3 2,075 2,117 5,275 3,280 6,921 4,633 3,134 6,943 2,125 5,509 3,262 7,031 Chng 2013-18 0 Avg Ann 42 642 146 C22) 0.5% 3.5 0.8% 03% Chng 2018-2023 0 Avg Ann 7 234 ('18 110 0.1% 0.9 -0.1 03% Chng 2003-13 0 Avg Ann 49 876 128 88 0.2% 1.7% 0.4% 0.1 8,743 9,972 10,898 1,230 4.5% 926 1.8% 2,155 2.2% 1,783 1,972 2,081 189 3.1% 109 1.1% 297 1.6 27,312 29,538 30,906 2,226 2.5% 1,368 0.9% 3,594 1.2% Most of this growth is projected to occur in administrative, support, waste management and remediation services industry sector. Administrative and support services account for 92 percent of the jobs in the administrative, support, waste management and remediation industry sector. Examples of firm -types in the administrative and support services industry include temporary employment services, business support services like telephone call centers, and office administrative services. - 18 - W-ZH , LLC Jobs by Office -Inclined Industry Corpus Christi Metro Area 2003. 2008. 2013. 2018. 2023 12,000 10,000 8,000 c 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Information Finance and OJ co Real Estate OJ 1111111111112003 1111111111111112008 ❑ 2013 1111111111111112018 1111111112023 Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA As the graph illustrates, some of the employment growth projected from 2013 to 2023 will compensate for job losses that occurred between 2003 and 2013. This is true for the administrative, support, waste management and remediation industry sector. Where jobs in this industry are projected to grow by 2,155 jobs between 2013 and 2023, 865 of these jobs (or 40 percent) compensate for job losses since 2003. Therefore, a portion of new job growth in this industry sector will likely occupy existing leased, but under-utilized office space. To quantify likely office demand over the next ten years, this analysis assumes that growth that compensates for job losses does not demand new office space. Instead, it is assumed that these new employees will likely occupy a business' existing (under-utilized) office space. Because firms in the administrative and support industries can occupy telephone call center -type space, it was assumed that the average square feet of space per employee is lower for this industry than the professional office average. An average of 125 square feet per employee was assumed. (Call centers range from 90 to 140 square feet per employee.) - 19 - W-ZH , LLC Administrative and Support Services Office Demand Corpus Christi Office Market 2013-2023 Administrative & Support" Less: Job Losses Since 2003 Net New Office Sq Ft /Job 2013-2018 1,128 (865) 2018-2023 263 125 849 0 849 125 Total 1,978 (865) 1,112 125 Sub -Total 32,860 106,170 139,030 1. New jobs multiplied by 92 percent to account for non -office employment in waste management and remediation services. Source: NAIOP "Changes in Average Square Feet per Worker"; Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[economy emp (Recovered).xls]Sheetl4 The administrative and support services industries will demand 139,000 square feet of office space. These industries may occupy existing vacant office space. They may also occupy vacant retail space where parking is plentiful. Real employment growth is projected for the finance and insurance industry sector. Over the next ten years, this industry sector is projected to gain eight hundred and seventy six jobs. Jobs in religious, grant, civic, and professional organizations are also projected to grow slightly. Professional businesses are using less office space per employee today than they were but five years ago. According to the CoreNet Global Corporate Real Estate 2020 survey of 500 corporate real estate executives, the metric has changed from 225 square feet in 2010 to 176 square feet in 2012, and is projected to reach 151 square feet in 2017. Other Office -Inclined Industry Office Demand Corpus Christi Office Market 2013-2023 Other Office -Inclined Industry Sq Ft /Job Sub -Total 2013-2018 996 175 174,360 2018-2023 442 150 66,320 Total 1,438 167 240,680 Source: NAIOP "Changes in Average Square Feet per Worker"; Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[economy emp (Recovered).xls]gen off Using these survey findings as a guideline, for the "other office -inclined" industries, 175 square feet per employee was assumed for new jobs generated between 2013 and 2018 and 150 square feet per employee between 2018 and 2023. Other office -inclined industries will demand approximately 241,000 square feet of office space between now and 2023. - 20 - W-ZH , LLCI The U.S. Census collects data on the number of jobs at the City level. The most recent data is from 2011. In 2011, 85 percent of all of the office -inclined jobs in the Metro Area were in the City of Corpus Christi. Most of the office supply is in the City. General Office Demand Corpus Christi City 2013-2023 Administrative and Support Services Other Office -Inclined Total Demand: Metro Area (Sq Ft) City Capture 2013-2018 32,860 174,360 207,220 80% 2018-2023 106,170 66,320 172,490 80% Total 139,030 240,680 379,710 80% City General Office Demand 165,800 Source: W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[economy emp (Recovered).xls]Sheetl3 138,000 303,800 For purposes of planning, it as assumed that the City would capture 80 percent of the general office demand. This translates into demand for 303,800 square feet of office space in the City by 2023. This demand will likely be satisfied with existing office supply as there is excess vacancy and the average rent is so low that new construction will be challenging from a financial feasibility standpoint. Medical Office Medical office space will also be in demand with the projected growth in the health and social service industries. Medical office space demand is generated from doctors' offices or "ambulatory care" providers. From 2002 to 2012, 40 percent of health and social services employment growth occurred in ambulatory care businesses. From 2007 to 2012, 27 percent of job growth in the the health and social services industry occurred in ambulatory care businesses. Ambulatory care businesses include doctor's offices, diagnostic laboratories, and clinics. Medical Office Demand Corpus Christi Office Market 2013-2023 New Jobs in Health and Social Service Industry Percent Ambulatory Care Medical Office Jobs 2013-2018 Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]Sheet8 5,082 30% 1,525 2018-2023 4,375 30% 1,310 Total 9,457 30% 2,835 The health care and social service industry is projected to grow significantly in the Metro Area between now and 2023. Given trends from 2002, it was assumed that 30 percent of the new job growth would occur in the ambulatory care industries. Therefore, it is estimated that there will be 2,835 new jobs in - 21 - W-ZH , LLCI health-related businesses that typically occupy general office (for example, psychiatrists) or medical office space (for example, dentists and general practitioners) by the year 2023. Medical Office: New Establishment Demand Corpus Christi Office Market 2013-2023 Medical Office Jobs Share New Establishments New Medical Establishment Jobs 2013-2018 Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]Sheetl0 1,525 50% 760 2018-2023 1,310 50% 660 Total 2,835 50% 1,420 A portion of the employment growth will likely be absorbed by existing practitioners. While some of the employment growth will result in new businesses. Employment and establishment data from 2002 through 2012 indicates that roughly half of the new jobs generated in ambulatory care located in new firms. The other half of the new jobs located in existing businesses. Medical Office Demand Corpus Christi Office Market 2013-2023 New Medical Establishment Jobs Sq Ft /Job 2013-2018 760 100 - 150 2018-2023 660 100 - 150 Total 1,420 100 - 150 Total Sq Ft Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[economy emp.xls]med office 76,000 - 114,000 66,000 - 99,000 142,000 - 213,000 The average number of square feet per medical employee varies depending upon the type of medical practice. For purposes of this analysis, a range of 100 square feet to 150 square feet per medical employee was assumed. Given this assumption, employment growth among new firms has the potential to demand between 142,000 and 213,000 square feet of medical -related office space over the next decade. Medical Office Demand Corpus Christi City 2013-2023 Total Sq Ft City Share City Potential (Sq Ft) 2013-2018 76,000 - 114,000 85% 65,000 97,000 2018-2023 66,000 - Total 99,000 142,000 - 213,000 85% 85% 56,000 84,000 121,000 181,000 Source: Moody's Analytics; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[economy emp (Recovered).xls]Sheetl2 - 22 - W-ZH , L L CI In 2011, the City contained 90 percent of the Metropolitan Area's health and social service employment. For purposes of planning, it is assumed that the City has the potential to capture 85 percent of future growth. Given this assumption, there will be demand for between 121,000 and 181,000 square feet of medical office space in the City by 2023. RETAIL Retail and Eating and Drinking Sales Retail Sales Retail Sales Coastal Bend, Corpus Christi Metro and Corpus Christi City 2014 Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Metro Corpus Christi City 000's City Share $9,240,452 $6,683,170 $4,929,767 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]Sheet6 53% 74% 100% 2014 retail sales in the City are estimated to total $5 billion. The City of Corpus Christi contains 72 percent of the Metro Area's population and City retail sales are 74 percent of the Metro's retail sales. The City's share of the region's total retail sales are in-line with the City's share of population. Comparing the population's retail spending power to estimated sales indicates whether a location is experiencing market leakage (outflow) or retail spending inflow. Typically, tourist destinations experience retail spending inflow. - 23 - W-ZH , LLC Total Retail Sales Inflow and Outflow Select Areas 2014 Retail Expenditure Potential Retail Sales Inflow/(Outflow) Inflow/(Outflow) $000's Coastal Bend $7,545,450 $9,240,452 $1,695,002 22% Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]Sheet2 Corpus Christi Metro $5,839,097 $6,683,170 $844,074 14% Corpus Christi City $4,171,993 $4,929,767 $757,773 18% There are more retail sales in the City than would be expected if only local residents were shopping. Eighteen percent of the City's retail sales are inflow sales. Total Retail Sales Net of Vehicle Sales Inflow and Outflow Select Areas 2014 $000's Coastal Bend Retail Expenditure Potential $6,092,990 Retail Sales $6,723,793 Corpus Christi Metro $4,704,098 $4,710,601 Corpus Christi City $3,347,382 $3,419,531 Inflow/(Outflow) Inflow/(Outflow) $630,804 10% Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]Sheet3 $6,503 0% $72,149 2% If vehicle sales are excluded from total retail sales, resident spending power and retail sales are essentially equal in the Metro Area and the City. Therefore, the retail inflow is mostly from vehicle sales, not recreational shopping. This is surprising given that Corpus Christi is a tourist destination. - 24 - W-ZH , LLCI Percent Retail Sales Inflow or Outflow Corpus Christi City 2014 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA It appears that many people come to Corpus Christi to purchase motor vehicles. This is not surprising given that the City is the region's economic hub. The City is also a destination for building material and garden equipment sales. These stores benefit from regional population growth. As the regional healthcare center, the City also experiences a net inflow of health and personal care sales. The City experiences a net outflow of general merchandise and miscellaneous store sales. It does not appear that tourists are shopping for general merchandise, specialty goods or clothing when visiting Corpus Christi. Eating and Drinking Sales Eating and drinking sales are distinct from retail sales. Eating and drinking sales are those sales that occur in restaurants, cafes, clubs, and take-out restaurants. Once again, it is normal for a tourist economy to experience above average eating and drinking sales due to the visitor market. - 25 - W-ZH , L L CI Total Eating and Drinking Sales Inflow and Outflow Select Areas 2014 Retail Expenditure Potential Retail Sales Inflow/(Outflow) Inflow/(Outflow) $000's Coastal Bend $807,877 $986,507 $178,630 22% Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]Sheet5 Corpus Christi Metro $616,198 $773,661 $157,463 26% Corpus Christi City $444,184 $573,192 $129,007 29% Where retail has not fully capitalized on the tourist market, it appears that the eating and drinking industry has benefited from the tourist. The City has almost 30 percent more eating and drinking sales than would be expected from resident spending. The City has the greatest eating and drinking inflow as compared to the Metro Area and Coastal Bend. Eating and Drinking Sales Coastal Bend, Corpus Christi Metro and Corpus Christi City 2014 Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Metro Corpus Christi City 000's City Share $986,507 $773,661 $573,192 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]Sheet7 58% 74% 100% The City's population is 54 percent of the Coastal Bend population, but the City's eating and drinking sales are 58 percent of the region's eating and drinking sales. - 26 - W-ZH , LLC Retail and Eat/Drink Sales Per Capita Select Areas 2014 Texas Total Retail Sales $15,053 Coastal Bend $15,647 Corpus Christi Metro $15,038 Corpus Christi City $15,501 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]per cap Retail Sales (Net of Vehicle Sales) $11,331 $11,385 $10,599 $10,752 Eat/Drink Sales $1,589 $1,670 $1,741 $1,622 On a per capita basis, retail sales (net of vehicle sales) in the City are below the Texas average. Eating and drinking sales per capita are above the Texas average. The Retail Supply and Market According to the "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview Data: Corpus Christi" produced by the Texas Real Estate Center at Texas A & M University, there are 22 million square feet of retail space in the Corpus Christi market. Retail space is located in seven sub -markets. - 27 - W-ZH , LLCI Retail Inventory Corpus Christi Market Area 4th Quarter 2013 CBD Mid -City South Side West Side Northwest Four Bluff/Padre Is. Portland/Ingleside Total " Sq Ft 000's Share of Total 1,694 5,940 6,228 1,585 1,648 1,628 1,830 20,553 8% 29% 30% 8% 8% 8% 9% 100% 1. The total square feet varies slightly from Commercial Real Estate Market Report where total square feet is 22.382 million. Source: CoStar Group and Burbach Associates; Texas Real Estate Center at Texas A & M University, "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview Data"; W-ZHA Retail is concentrated on South Padre Island Drive which carries over 100,000 vehicles per day. South Padre Island Drive serves both the Mid -City and the South Side sub -markets. Together these sub - markets contain 12 million square feet of retail space or approximately 60 percent of the market's retail space. - 28 - W-ZH , LLC Retail Inventory and Vacancy Rate Corpus Christi Market Area 4th Quarter 2013 Sub -Market CBD Mid -City South Side West Side Northwest Four Bluff/Padre Is. Portland/Ingleside Sq Ft 000's 1,694 5,940 6,228 1,585 1,648 1,628 1,830 Vacancy Rate 6.0% 4.0% 4.7% 6.4% 12.8% 4.7% 6.6% Source: CoStar Group and Burbach Associates; Texas Real Estate Center at Texas A & M University, "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview Data"; W-ZHA As of the 4th Quarter of 2013, the overall retail vacancy rate in the Corpus Christi market was 5.6 percent. Retail in the Central Business District reported a vacancy rate of 6 percent while Mid -City and South Side have vacancy rates below 5 percent. The highest vacancy rate was in the Northwest sub- market. Aggregate Income Per Square Mile Corpus Christi Census Tracts 2014 Source: Claritas, Inc.; W-ZHA - 29 - W-ZH , LLCI The dominant retail intersection in the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area is the corner of South Padre Island Drive and Staples Drive. As the map illustrates this location is convenient to those areas with a concentration of income. The La Palmera Mall, the Shops at La Palmera, the Staples Center and the Moore Center are located here. La Palmera Mall is a regional shopping center with over a million square feet. The mall is anchored by Dillard's, Macy's and JC Penney. The Shops at La Palmera is an adjacent 230,000 square foot strip center. The Staples Center is a strip community center across from La Palmera Mall and adjacent to the struggling Sunrise Mall. Moore Plaza is a 535,000 square foot regional strip shopping center that is anchored by HEB, Target and Steinmart. Retail Inventory and Rental Rates Corpus Christi Market Area 4th Quarter 2013 Sub -Market CBD Mid -City South Side West Side Northwest Four Bluff/Padre Is. Portland/Ingleside Sq Ft 000's 1,694 5,940 6,228 1,585 1,648 1,628 1,830 Rental Rate $10.09 $12.88 $17.54 $10.22 $5.43 $14.17 $14.60 Source: CoStar Group and Burbach Associates; Texas Real Estate Center at Texas A & M University, "2013 Texas Metro Market Overview Data"; W-ZHA The South Side sub -market commands the highest retail rents, while Northwest rental rates are the lowest. - 30 - W-ZH Retail Prospects , LLC Corpus Christi's strong economy and projected growth should have a positive impact on retail. Retail (Net of Vehicle Sales) Potential Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 2014-2024 New Residents Spending /Resident Tota I Sq Ft @ $350 Sales/Sq Ft Source: W-ZHA 29,295 $10,800 $316,382,800 904,000 F:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]proectin Population growth over the next ten years should support 904,000 square feet of retail. Eating and Drinking Potential Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area 2014-2024 New Residents Spending /Resident Total Sq Ft @ $450 Sales/Sq Ft Source: W-ZHA 29,295 $1,620 $47,457,400 f:\8000s, misc\82325 Corpus Christi\[retail analysis.xlsx]Sheetl3 105,500 Population growth over the next ten years should support 105,500 square feet of eating and drinking space. - 31 - W-ZH A, LLC HOTEL MARKET Hotel Market Trends The performance of the Corpus Christi hotel market was analyzed from 2008 to 2013. The performance of the midscale and upscale hotel market was compared to all hotels in the Corpus Christi market. The hotels included in the midscale and upscale sample were developed with the assistance of a hotel owner who owns a number of competitive hotels in the Corpus Christi market. Midscale to Upscale Class Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2014 Name Hampton Inn & Suites Port Aransas Omni Corpus Christi Hotel Best Western Marina Grand Hotel Holiday Inn Corpus Christi Downtown Marina Quality Inn & Suites On The Beach Radisson Hotel Corpus Christi Beach Comfort Suites Central Corpus Christi La Quinta Inns & Suites Corpus Christi Airport Holiday Inn Corpus Christi Arprt Cony Ctr Hampton Inn Suites Corpus Christi 137 Navigation Holiday Inn Express & Suites Corpus Christi North Holiday Inn Express Corpus Christi NW Calallen La Quinta Inns & Suites Corpus Christi West Hampton Inn Corpus Christi Northwest 137 Comfort Inn & Suites Corpus Christi Courtyard Corpus Christi Embassy Suites Corpus Christi Holiday Inn Express & Suites Corpus Christi Staybridge Suites Corpus Christi Springhill Suites Corpus Christi Downtown Residence Inn Corpus Christi TownePlace Suites Corpus Christi Hyatt Place Corpus Christi Hilton Garden Inn Corpus Christi Comfort Suites Near Texas A & M Corpus Christi Candlewood Suites Corpus Christi Spid Hawthorn Suites by Wyndham Corpus Christi Homewood Suites Corpus Christi Comfort Suites North Padre Island Corpus Christi Holiday Inn Corpus Christi North Padre Source: W-ZHA; Smith Travel Research F:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[hotel.xls]Sheetl Class Upper Midscale Class Upper Upscale Class Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Midscale Class Upscale Class Upper Midscale Class Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upscale Class Upper Upscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upscale Class Upscale Class Upscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upscale Class Upscale Class Upper Midscale Class Midscale Class Midscale Class Upscale Class Upper Midscale Class Upper Midscale Class Rooms 78 475 173 334 112 139 93 67 237 80 64 71 66 55 61 105 150 88 84 119 66 107 103 119 66 74 62 86 75 149 - 32 - W-ZH A, LLC The midscale to upscale class hotels analyzed are presented in the table above. Hotel Room Supply Midscale to Upscale Class Hotels and All Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2008 - 2013 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Change '08-'13 Room Night Supply Mid/Uppermid Hotels 1,031,675 1,108,425 1,131,135 1,144,831 1,143,769 1,196,466 16% Source: Smith Travel Research; W-ZHA F:\8000s, misc\82326 Corpus Christi\[hotel.xls]Sheet2 Total 3,638,505 3,654,306 3,693,806 3,709,684 3,708,989 3,761,262 3% The supply of midscale to upscale hotels in Corpus Christi has increased since 2008. There are sixteen percent more midscale to upscale room nights available in Corpus Christi than there were in 2008. Hotel Occupancy Midscale to Upscale Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2008 - 2013 11111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111114.111111111111111111111 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Smith Travel Research; W-ZHA - 33 - W-ZH , LLC Even with the increase in supply, occupancy among the midscale to upscale hotels has been increasing. At year-end 2013, room nights available in these hotels were 65 percent occupied. Revenue Per Available Room Midscale to Upscale Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2008 - 2013 $80.00 $70.00 °o $60.00 d _o $50.00 . • $40.00 y $30.00 • $20.00 a) $10.00 $0.00 111,01,11 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Smith Travel Research; W-ZHA The average daily rate for a hotel room in these hotels was $102.34 in 2008. Five years later, the average daily rate was $113.79 in midscale to upscale hotels. The revenue per available room in midscale to upscale hotels has increased by 28 percent over five years even as the supply has increased. - 34 - W-ZH , LLC $80.00 $70.00 $60.00 g $50.00 $40.00 a u $30.00 O $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 Revenue Per Available Room Midscale to Upscale Hotels and All Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2008 - 2013 IIIIIIIIIIII 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Mid/Upper Hotels All Hotels Source: Smith Travel Research; W-ZHA Like the midscale to upscale hotels, the entire Corpus Christi hotel market experienced an increase in revenue per available room since 2008. The new hotel supply does not appear to be cannibalizing the market by taking market share from older hotels. It appears that growth in the economy is supporting the overall hotel industry. - 35 - W-ZH A, LLC $120.00 c $100.00 0 $80.00 ca c . $60.00 Ci $40.00 c $20.00 $0.00 Revenue Per Available Room by Month Midscale to Upscale Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2013 at�e ��atA �a`Gr p9 >\• a� J�� P F Source: Smith Travel Research; W-ZHA \-a ms`s. es es es es G-.9 ‹� SC h aa c() Oen Both business travel and tourism support the hotel industry in Corpus Christi. Hotels do best during the summer season when children are out of school and the weather is good. The fall and winter months are the weakest (September to February). - 36 - W-ZH , LLC 80% 70% 60% Hotel Occupancy by the Day of the Week Midscale to Upscale Hotels and All Hotels Corpus Christi Hotel Market 2013 rem 50% 40% a U 0 20% 1O% 0% Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu IIIIIIIIIIIIIAII Mid/Upper Source: Smith Travel Research; W-ZHA Fri Sat While the tourist is recognized as central to the hotel market, it is important to note that during the heart of the work week (Tuesday and Wednesday), the midscale to upscale hotels are as occupied as they are on a Saturday night. According to hotel managers, 70 percent of their occupancy is driven by the business traveler. The needs of both the business traveler and the tourist are important considerations from an economic development standpoint. Hotel Market Prospects Corpus Christi's hotel market has responded to regional economic growth. With an overall occupancy rate of 65 percent and the average revenue per available room over $70.00, the midscale and upscale hotel market is healthy. Employment is projected to continue to increase over the next decade. This will drive additional hotel demand in Corpus Christi. Employment growth alone will generate demand for an additional 300 to 500 rooms by 2023. To: From: Cc: Re: Date: oil 2730 Forest Avenue, Suite W Berkeley, California 94705 85 Fourth Avenue, Suite 6A New York, New York 10003 Office Phone: 510-356-4956 Mobile Phone: 917-816-8367 info@consultmjb.com www.consultmjb.com Memorandum Ben Carlson Director of Urban Design, Goody Clancy Michael J. Berne President, MJB Consulting Mitch Glass Senior Urban Designer, Goody Clancy Retail Market Analysis and Strategy / Downtown Corpus Christi — Findings and Recommendations June 19, 2015 In 2014, Goody Clancy was commissioned by the City of Corpus Christi to develop a Comprehensive Plan for the entire City ("Plan CC") as well as an area plan for its Downtown ("Downtown Area Development Plan", or DADP). To ensure that these planning efforts were informed by market realities, Goody Clancy's team included specialists for each of the primary land uses. For the DADP, the firm asked MJB Consulting (MJB), a retail planning and real estate consultancy, to undertake an analysis of Downtown retail and propose a strategy for enhancing it. 1 MJB's due diligence for this assignment consisted of the following: - Familiarization with past plans and projects, including conversations with City staff as well as in-depth review of Caller -Times archives - Guided and self -guided walking and driving tours of the study area and immediate vicinity as well as other Corpus Christi and Coastal Bend neighborhoods, including (but not limited to) Westside, Six Points, Southside, Lamar Park, Padre Island, Portland and Port Aransas - Observations of existing retail mix and dynamics in Downtown Corpus Christi and each of its individual sub -districts and corridors (Core, Uptown, SEA District, North Beach, Hillcrest and Washington -Coles), including review of available spaces and sites, relevant projects and initiatives, etc. - Survey and assessment of competing districts and centers, including (but not limited to) South Padre Island Drive / SR 358 (La Palmera, Shops at La Palmera, Moore Plaza, etc.), Staples Street, Portland / U.S. 181, Westside, Six Points, Lamar Park, Port Aransas, Padre Island and Outlets at Corpus Christi Bay (future) - Interviews with property owners, leasing professionals and key stakeholders, including Terry Sweeney (DMD), Brad Lomax (Water Street Market), Casey Lain (House of Rock), Matt Cravey (Cravey Real Estate Services), Wayne Lundquist (Cobb -Lundquist & Atnip) and Joe Adame (Joe Adame and Co.) - Presentations to and meetings with two groups of retail stakeholders as well as the DADP Advisory Committee - Retrieval and analysis of demographic and sales -leakage data for Downtown Corpus Christi primary trade area, along with comparisons to the Corpus Christi MSA - Gathering of available information on non-residential sources of consumer demand in Downtown Corpus Christi, including (but not limited to) daytime workers, tourism and "destination" businesses - Review of and integration with findings from other experts on the consultant team (i.e. Goody Clancy, ZimmermanNolk, W-ZHA, etc.) - Reference to relevant comparables from across Texas and North America, including Downtown San Antonio (where MJB Consulting is currently working on a retail strategy and implementation effort) In undertaking this scope -of -work, MJB's Principal, Michael J. Berne, applied the firm's unique "total immersion" methodology, visiting Corpus Christi three times and spending twelve days on site. 2 Detail The following presents MJB's findings and recommendations, in the format of an "executive summary" memo as agreed upon in the initial contract. Identifying the right "positioning" of a retail mix requires an assessment of two discrete "markets", one in which consumers demand goods and services from businesses, and the other in which tenants seek street -level space from landlords. I. Consumer Demand - For the purposes of quantifying and characterizing those nearby residents who would be most likely to gravitate to the Downtown core, a "primary trade area" has been hypothesized (see map below), corresponding to a five-minute drive time from the intersection of N Chaparral Street and Peoples Street. Source: Nielsen-Claritas, MJB Consulting - The demographic profile of this primary trade area is summarized in the table below, with the numbers for the Corpus Christi metro provided for the sake of comparison: 3 Source: Nielsen-Claritas, MJB Consulting The primary trade area lags the Corpus Christi metro when measured in terms of percentages and medians. In absolute numbers, it can point to a modestly sized contingent of roughly 800 to 1,600 "blue-chip" consumers (i.e. 1,520 college-educated residents; 1,140 creative class workers; 1,150 households with annual incomes of $75,000 or more, with 350 living in homes valued at $200,000 or more), although, with new projects like The Cosmopolitan and in light of Zimmerman/Volk's finding that there is potential for 4,400 more residents by the year 2025, this sub -market will continue to grow. - In addition to those who live in the primary trade area, the Downtown can also draw on certain non-residential generators of demand, like, for instance, the approximately 20,500 daytime workers. Yet while a significant percentage is employed in higher -paying, white-collar office positions, these jobs are heavily concentrated in Uptown, just a five- minute walk from the core but psychologically much further owing to the grade change. Another non-residential demand generator is tourism. The Coastal Bend attracts 8.1 million visitors per year, and while mid -market families are the core demographic, 38% of the households earn annual incomes of $75,000 or more, and 23%, $100,000 or more. However, only 900,000 of the 8.1 million actually spend time in the core, as most of the popular attractions are located to the north, in the SEA District and North Beach. 11. Competition - Downtown Corpus Christi must vie for the attention of both consumers and prospective tenants with other centers and districts across the city and metro. And in most categories, it struggles to compete and will likely continue doing so, owing to the strong gravitational pull of much larger rivals with more conventional anchors and superior co -tenancy. For example, it stands little chance against South Padre Island Drive (SR 358) as a mass-market shopping destination or retail location. - The same sort of competitive disadvantage applies within smaller sub -markets and niches as well, with upscale consumers and brands most likely to gravitate to the Alameda Street corridor in Lamar Park, antique collectors and dealers to the Avalon Street "Antique 4 Downtown Corpus Christi Primary Trade Area Corpus Christi Metro Population Population 20,000 449,000 Education and Employment Percent College -Educated 11% 19% Percent Without H.S. Diploma 39% 21% Percent Not In The Labor Force 50% 37% Income and Wealth Median Household Income $28,000 $52,000 Percent Housing Units Owner -Occupied 37% 63% Median Home Value $73,000 $123,000 Mobility Percent Households Without Cars 26% 8% Source: Nielsen-Claritas, MJB Consulting The primary trade area lags the Corpus Christi metro when measured in terms of percentages and medians. In absolute numbers, it can point to a modestly sized contingent of roughly 800 to 1,600 "blue-chip" consumers (i.e. 1,520 college-educated residents; 1,140 creative class workers; 1,150 households with annual incomes of $75,000 or more, with 350 living in homes valued at $200,000 or more), although, with new projects like The Cosmopolitan and in light of Zimmerman/Volk's finding that there is potential for 4,400 more residents by the year 2025, this sub -market will continue to grow. - In addition to those who live in the primary trade area, the Downtown can also draw on certain non-residential generators of demand, like, for instance, the approximately 20,500 daytime workers. Yet while a significant percentage is employed in higher -paying, white-collar office positions, these jobs are heavily concentrated in Uptown, just a five- minute walk from the core but psychologically much further owing to the grade change. Another non-residential demand generator is tourism. The Coastal Bend attracts 8.1 million visitors per year, and while mid -market families are the core demographic, 38% of the households earn annual incomes of $75,000 or more, and 23%, $100,000 or more. However, only 900,000 of the 8.1 million actually spend time in the core, as most of the popular attractions are located to the north, in the SEA District and North Beach. 11. Competition - Downtown Corpus Christi must vie for the attention of both consumers and prospective tenants with other centers and districts across the city and metro. And in most categories, it struggles to compete and will likely continue doing so, owing to the strong gravitational pull of much larger rivals with more conventional anchors and superior co -tenancy. For example, it stands little chance against South Padre Island Drive (SR 358) as a mass-market shopping destination or retail location. - The same sort of competitive disadvantage applies within smaller sub -markets and niches as well, with upscale consumers and brands most likely to gravitate to the Alameda Street corridor in Lamar Park, antique collectors and dealers to the Avalon Street "Antique 4 Lane" near the intersection of Alameda and Everhart, the "artsy-urban" set to Six Points, neo -hippies to the Water Street Village complex along South Water Street, etc. 111. Positioning and Tenanting Strategy - Given that there are no obvious "silver-bullet(s)", that none of the aforementioned demand segments (i.e. trade area residents, office workers, tourists, etc.) are large enough to sustain the retail mix on their own, Downtown Corpus Christi will need to be multi- dimensional, catering to several different sub -markets and day -parts, with the businesses corresponding to each one clustered together so as to generate cross -traffic for each other and coalesce into a visible and recognizable niche. - The most promising of these "mini -opportunities" are ones that build from strength and that leverage existing anchors and co -tenancies. Downtown, for example, is already well established as a regional destination for live music, boasting a diverse ecosystem of performance venues that range in size from the American Bank Center (with a capacity for 10,000 patrons) to the House of Rock (500), and that can accommodate a wide variety of acts. While the subject demands further examination, Downtown's live -music niche might be capable of supporting additional offerings, including perhaps a mid-sized option like The Knitting Factory (a famed New York City venue that has since expanded to smaller markets like Spokane, Boise and Reno) as well as more intimate bars, with capacity for 100 to 200, that can showcase smaller touring bands. - Downtown used to be more prominent as a drinking destination but has lost some of its luster in recent years. It might, however, start to fill that void by offering a greater diversity of evening -oriented concepts that, while still dependent on alcohol as a source of revenue, also offer the possibility of other sorts of activities and experiences besides excessive consumption. Examples might include: 1) a "dueling -piano" bar; 2) a "bar-cade", which combines food and drink with a selection of vintage arcade games; 3) a bowling alley which, in contrast to family/league-oriented suburban venues, doubles as a lounge or nightclub; and/or 4) a true sports bar, designed specifically with the sports fanatic in mind, with large -screen televisions seemingly in every direction (e.g. Dallas -based, Canadian -born Boston's Restaurant & Sports Bar). One especially intriguing possibility is Los Angeles -based Trifecta Management Group, which develops unique food and entertainment concepts customized to the specifics of local (often secondary) markets. Venues might include live music, arcade games, bowling alleys, high-definition TV's as well as various other leisure activities (e.g. billiards, bocce, etc.), and typically feature local chefs and vendors. - Downtown missed a golden opportunity to expand its evening economy when Alamo Drafthouse Cinema decided to develop its first Corpus Christi theater on the Southside. 5 Another possibility, however, is a niche concept like Maya Cinemas, the California-based exhibitor drawn to revitalizing areas with large Latino populations. While its multiplexes feature first -run movies, it also devotes screens to Spanish-language fare. Its founder and CEO, Moctesuma Esparza, is an industry veteran who co-produced Selena and The Milagro Beanfield War, among other pictures. - In stark contrast to the perceived dominance of larger chains on the Southside, Downtown Corpus Christi also boasts one of the Coastal Bend's largest concentrations of unique, owner -operated restaurants, several of which — like Water Street Oyster Bar, Bleu Bistro and the Republic of Texas Bar & Grill, for example -- enjoy a regional draw. This existing collection could serve as the basis for a marketing campaign that draws new customers and operators. In order, however, to preempt cannibalization and complement (rather than undermine) what already exists, additional offerings should focus on capturing more destination diners and taking market share from other parts of the region, while at the same time drawing tourists and workers. Possibilities include small regional chain -lets that typically open just one location per market, or local restaurateurs already successful elsewhere in the Coastal Bend and interested in developing a new concept in the Downtown. As part of this positioning, additional offerings might showcase homegrown dishes and formats that locals would perceive as uniquely Corpus Christi, perhaps offering new interpretations of familiar foods and beverages. And while restaurateurs cannot afford to venture too far from prevailing tastes and sensibilities, there would seem to be room in the market for at least one or two more elevated (though still moderately -priced) "foodie" concepts. - One of the most dynamic areas in the industry today is in non -permanent "mobile" retailing, like carts, trucks and shipping containers. A chief advantage of these formats is that they allow businesses to customize their operations to periods of peak demand (e.g. weekday lunch, weekend nightlife, special events, etc.) and avoid the high fixed costs of a storefront lease. In so doing, they lower the barriers -to -entry for early-stage entrepreneurs who have ideas and talent but limited capital. The result, as anyone who has visited one of Austin's famed food -truck pods will corroborate, is a flowering of new and innovative concepts, which can help to activate vacant lots and public spaces, generate buzz and media attention, portray the host district as hip and contemporary as well as validate an unproven market for other prospects. Some vendors even ultimately become permanent storefront tenants themselves. Yet while this movement is most commonly associated with food, it could take many other forms as well, like, for instance, fashion trucks, which customers can enter via a collapsible staircase in back and then browse the offerings within, even trying them on in a cordoned -off dressing room. A similar sort of low-cost setup could also work for other kinds of comparison goods, like books, or various services and conveniences, such as haircuts or beauty supplies. 6 - So-called "traditional" retail — that is, businesses selling goods and services (as opposed to food, drink or entertainment) — will be far more difficult to attract and sustain at this early stage of Downtown's evolution, given the relatively low levels of daytime foot traffic (when most consumers shop) and close -in residential (generating pedestrian activity on the weekends) as well as the weak connectivity between its individual districts (limiting potential spin-off from the few existing pockets of vitality). - The retail categories that typically receive the most attention in a fledgling Downtown like Corpus Christi's are the basic conveniences thought to be essential to its emergence as a residential neighborhood. Yet while the arrival of a grocery store would be an important symbol and milestone, its absence is by no means a deal -breaker, and certainly not as detrimental as the failure of one that opened too soon. Generally speaking, a dedicated population of 10,000 to 15,000 is considered the minimum threshold for a full-service supermarket. Right now, though, the trade area's 20,000 residents can already shop at one of three H.E.B. stores (on Leopard, Port and Alameda). Furthermore, the trade area is currently importing expenditures of roughly $2.7 million in the category, meaning that if anything it is over -supplied. Roughly the same threshold applies to a large -format drug store. In this case, however, the trade area is grossly over -supplied, with $21.3 million in imported expenditures, and contributions from other sub -markets (e.g. workers, visitors, patients, etc.) are not sufficient to close the gap. Indeed, the CVS that had been located at Six Points closed, despite its proximity to CHRISTUS Spohn's Shoreline hospital campus. Additional stores from these operators would most likely cannibalize their existing locations in or near the trade area: another H -E -B in the Downtown core, even if it were successful, would be simply taking customers and sales from itself. In other words, it is only with continued residential growth that such formats will start to become more attainable and sustainable: the market cannot be forced. - In terms of comparison retail, the low number of nearby residents can in some instances be overcome by the presence of anchors that can draw high volumes of foot traffic during the day (when consumers typically shop for such goods), and particularly on the weekends. They might live in other parts of the Corpus Christi metro and/or be visiting the Coastal Bend as tourists. A clear example of the latter is the Rivercenter Mall in Downtown San Antonio, a 500,000 square foot enclosed center that generates north of $500 per square foot — thereby qualifying as a "Class A" mall by industry standards — largely on the shoulders of tourists (who are responsible for 75% of its overall sales) and in the absence of nearby residents. Of course, Downtown San Antonio contains 14,000 hotel rooms (versus approximately 1,760 in the Downtown Corpus Christi study area), and draws 30 million annual visitors (8.1 million). Furthermore, the mall there is centrally located with respect to the tourist 7 experience, with connections to the Riverwalk as well as frontage on Alamo Plaza. And even with such advantages, it still struggles to expand beyond its core teen and 20 - something customer. In other words, Downtown Corpus Christi is far from the point when it could hope for something on this scale. While the Coastal Bend might very well be capable of sustaining a second regional comparison -oriented shopping center, the more imminent possibility is in Robstown, at the intersection of U.S. 77 and SR 44, where the 330,000 square foot Outlets at Corpus Christi Bay would be able to capture expenditures from motorists driving to and from Mexico, the Rio Grande Valley and South Padre Island. - The larger point is that retail revitalization in a Downtown setting like Corpus Christi's must be understood as a kind of evolution: each phase corresponds to certain kinds of categories and operators, and in the absence of massive and ongoing operating subsidies from the City and/or the developers, none of these phases can be "skipped" without risking some sort of "black eye" (i.e. a failed store) and jeopardizing the entire process. - At this earlier stage in its evolution, there are other formats in some of these categories that Downtown could support. These include a so-called "limited -assortment" grocer, like an ALDI, which retails an edited selection of mostly private-label brands in a no-frills environment at very low prices, or a discount variety store, such as 99 Cents Only, that also sells groceries and even produce. Another basic convenience that might be possible at this point is a family restaurant or "diner", like a Village Inn, which offers an extensive and broadly appealing menu (without alcohol) in an unpretentious setting at reasonable prices. And finally, a new cafe might avoid the fate of the closed Coffee Waves location at Water Street Market if it is able to secure a below-market rent from a landlord, can supplement revenue from other sources (e.g. as a lunch spot, wine bar, etc.) and/or includes a drive-thru window. Given the low levels of daytime foot traffic, comparison retail remains high-risk at this stage -- as is clear from the ongoing churn at Water Street Market, arguably the most favorable location for such businesses in the Downtown. Exceptions include ones that: I) are operated by savvy, high-caliber merchants; 2) can draw as destinations while also enjoying other sources of revenue besides the walk-in trade (e.g. online, wholesale, etc.); and 3) benefit from low occupancy costs and flexible property owners. - Generally speaking, the food, drink and entertainment categories discussed above are the more important ones in the early stages of Downtown revitalization, inasmuch as they — far more than basic services like grocery and drug stores — help in establishing the "there, there" that then drives interest in the location as a residential address and creates value for developers. Put simply, in a metro like Corpus Christi, where sprawl is not constrained, one lives, or wants to live, in a Downtown not because it has a supermarket, but rather, because it is an exciting place to be, with attractions and energy that simply cannot be found elsewhere. 8 In the absence of such "sizzle", even the presence of a new and gleaming H -E -B would not be enough. "Retail follows rooftops" is an oft -quoted industry adage, and it is largely true in most categories. The challenge with Downtown revitalization, however, is that the rooftops themselves only materialize in response to pioneering retail. Indeed, if one were simply to wait for the former before even tackling the latter, then the demand might never actually arrive. Take, as an example, the Pearl Brewery in San Antonio. When Silver Ventures initially proceeded with the redevelopment in the early 2000's, there were no rooftops on site or in the vicinity. Its first move was to entice local celebrity chefs to develop new dining concepts there, followed by a new campus for the prestigious Culinary Institute of America (CIA) and then, a weekly Farmers Market. Today, the Pearl Brewery contains no less than fifteen restaurant and bars, along with 40,000 square feet of retail space, and it has become a premier residential address, with 300+ housing units that command the highest lease rates and sales prices in the entire metro (in addition to several new mid -rise apartment complexes that others have developed in the immediate vicinity). Its success could be attributed to a number of different factors, including its owner -- a deep -pocketed billionaire intent on developing a "legacy project" and both willing and able to absorb early losses in the name of a longer-term vision — but there can be little doubt that retail, food specifically, played a critical role in its evolution and residential appeal. - In order to sustain a cluster of comparison retailers as well as improve the prospects for restaurants and cafes, it will be necessary to land one or more daytime anchors capable of generating large volumes of foot traffic and providing an additional day -part. Such efforts could point to the well -located vacant land and the consolidated property ownership, the latter theoretically offering an incentive for subsidizing "loss -leaders". One possible anchor is a family-oriented amusement park concept, similar to what was proposed by TRT Holdings for the Memorial Auditorium site in 2006, and far more extensive than either Hurricane Alley Waterpark or Schlitterbahn. Such an attraction would align with the psychographics of both visitors and metro -wide residents, and would draw large numbers to the Downtown — nearly 500,000, in TRT's earlier estimation. Another possible anchor is the outdoor -recreation "category killer". According to the Corpus Christi CVB, "nature tourism" was part of nearly half of all visitor trips in 2012/13, and yet none of the most well known operators -- Bass Pro, Cabela's and Gander Mountain, for example -- have a presence in the Coastal Bend, leaving just the (comparatively) limited selections at Wal-Mart, Academy Sports, Dick's Sporting Goods, etc. 9 While their typical floor -plates of 100,000+ square feet might be too large for a Downtown setting, both Bass Pro and Cabela's have started to open roughly 40,000 square foot "Outpost" stores in smaller markets (e.g. Bass Pro's new 42,000 square foot unit in Lubbock, an MSA of 306,000 people). They typically do not gravitate to conventional strips like S.P.I.D., and while The Outlets at Corpus Christi Bay might appeal to them, they could also be intrigued by Downtown's more central location. Lastly, a campus for a TAMU-CC School of Art, along with student housing, could have a transformative impact on Downtown retail: not only would it synergize with the existing live -music venues and art galleries, but also, it would provide support for an art supply store (such as a Jerry's Artarama), a coffeehouse, casual eateries and perhaps even one or two niche -specific comparison retailers (like a vintage clothier, for instance). And while it might not offer quite the same sex appeal or spin-off potential as a university arts program, a cosmetology and beauty academy, like the Texas-based Ogle School (with eight locations statewide), would offer valuable training for possible careers in the salon industry (as well as affordable haircuts for the general public) and would appeal in particular to lower-income residents in nearby neighborhoods. - Finally, just as each of the evolutionary phases in the revitalization process correlates with specific categories and operators, each also corresponds to a certain quantity and scale of retail, and disregarding such limits would likely backfire in the form of vacant storefronts or constant turnover. In the case of Downtown Corpus Christi, there is, at this point, only enough demand (from consumers and prospective tenants) to support the equivalent of one walk -able business district. This current level of demand should be concentrated, to the extent possible, in one place -- rather than diluted across the several that exist in the study area — so as to take full advantage of the synergistic potential of co -location. Specifically, adjacent retailers generate cross -traffic for each other that they would not necessarily be able to attract on their own, and more easily cohere into something marketable than if they were scattered across a sprawling, disconnected land mass. The precedent for retail is strongest, and the catalytic potential seemingly greatest, in the Downtown core itself, which, with Chaparral Street and the adjoining side streets, can still point to a compact, walk -able, largely intact storefront fabric with historic and symbolic resonance. And with its cluster of dining and nightlife draws, its collection of hotels, its proximity to the Uptown office district and its potential for new housing, it can also offer a greater level of diversity and consistency in its consumer demand. Of course, with most of the visitor attractions located to the north, additional food, drink and entertainment uses might be possible there as well, particularly in the SEA District. That, however, would first require the creation of new inventory, which would likely assume a more isolated and disconnected form -- similar to the attractions themselves — and which would present formidable competition to (and amount to an abandonment of) the core. 10 - Within the core itself, Chaparral Street should be the top priority: as the most identifiable street in the Downtown and, with the recent streetscape improvements, also the most attractive and walk -able, its progress — both real and perceived -- will have the greatest bearing on Downtown's overall brand. Focusing efforts there would also serve to reinforce and protect such public investments as well as private ventures like The Cosmopolitan. And in terms of the consumer, Chaparral Street is the most central of the core's north - south thoroughfares, and therefore, the most convenient for its various sub -markets. For while Shoreline Boulevard can offer the bay -front, and Water Street, visibility and access to the motorist, a Chaparral location is able to capitalize on proximity to and provide an added amenity for the daytime workers in Uptown, while, at least on one side, also enjoying Water Street frontage (a la Water Street Market). - Again, a strategy of prioritizing the core and Chaparral Street makes sense for Downtown Corpus Christi in the current stage of its evolution, but as the demand fundamentals improve, as the residential population grows and new daytime anchors are added, other districts could become more viable for retail. For now, though, these other districts are more appropriately designated for other (equally critical) uses and initiatives. In the meantime, the retail mix in each should be limited to what exists today, and perhaps, a few other ancillary businesses that would not weaken tenant demand for or reduce consumer expenditure in the core. For example, the Uptown intersection of Leopard Street and Staples Street, near the City Hall, the County Courthouse and soon, the RTA's new Staples Street Center, would be suitable, say, for additional quick -service food and beverage operators like Subway, Dunkin Donuts or even a Huddle House. - In terms of specific blocks and sites, the approach should be one of building from existing strengths, with near-term tenanting should focus on: I) available spaces along the stretch of Chaparral Street from William to Schatzell, leveraging both the Water Street Market and The Cosmopolitan; 2) storefronts on intersecting side streets headed towards Uptown, including William, Schatzell and Peoples, from Chaparral to Mesquite; and 3) mobile retailing opportunities for La Retama Park. In the medium term, tenanting efforts would encompass new Chaparral Street inventory created by the redevelopment of now -vacant building and sites (first initiated in the near term), including: I) the Ward Building; 2) the Greyhound Bus Station; and 3) the parcels currently owned by TRT Holdings at the northern end of the existing fabric. The leasing climate north of Schatzell should start to improve once there is a clear and positive direction for the future of these last two. IV. Next Steps - Retail tenanting in a struggling Downtown requires a fundamentally different mindset. Unlike most suburban shopping centers, it does not necessarily sell itself. For this reason, 11 simply posting a "For Lease" sign and then waiting for tenants to discover the opportunity on their own — the sort of reactive approach taken by most developers, landlords and brokers -- is often not enough, especially if the goal is not just to fill space but also, to catalyze broader revitalization. There is a need, then, for a more proactive effort, one that recognizes the true balance - of -power in this small corner of retail leasing — that the buyer, not the seller, is the one with all of the leverage — and that it therefore falls to the property owner (or its representative or advocate) to take the case directly and forcefully to the tenant, offering a convincing argument for why Downtown should be on its radar screen, with both a compelling pitch as well as other inducements, financial or otherwise. - The DMD assumes a pivotal role in this regard. Not only can it point to an energetic executive director with a background in real estate development — especially important in light of the relatively weak corporate presence in Downtown -- but also, as a property and business organization with a place -specific (versus a city- or metro -wide) mandate, it can more easily sidestep messy political dynamics that could potentially derail such efforts. Specifically, it is the DMD that should take the lead on the retail strategy outlined here, advocating on behalf of (or in opposition to) specific tenancies and uses; serving as their "concierge" or middleman with the City and other stakeholders (when necessary); lobbying for other broader initiatives and investments that might be necessary; and, more generally, providing a level of reassurance to prospective tenants and existing merchants that, like a shopping center manager, someone is "minding the store" and protecting their interests. Obviously the DMD does not have much actual leverage in this arena, but it can gain some clout by partnering closely with the public sector, which might have to remain behind the scenes for political reasons but which could align its various "carrots" and "sticks" — like, for instance, modestly sized forgivable loans for build -out assistance (below), expedited "fast-track" permitting, etc. — with the tenanting strategy outlined here. The DMD should also look to develop and strengthen relationships with the sub -set of property owners that are for various reasons incentivized to take a broader approach to retail leasing and might consider one or more "loss -leaders". These include landlords that have a larger portfolio and stake in the Downtown, that can appreciate the value of street - level tenanting in driving premiums on the (more profitable) uses upstairs, and/or that retain a sentimental attachment to the district and the city. - The DMD should position itself as an information clearinghouse, offering — with a separate link on its website as well as in print form (below) -- hard -to -find data points that retailers and brokers cannot easily obtain on their own, including a comprehensive inventory of available (and soon -to -be -available) spaces, details on individual sub -markets (e.g. visitors) and demand generators (e.g. live -music venues), testimonials from existing merchants, news on future developments and improvements, etc. 12 The print format would offer more than just information: a professionally developed and designed brochure that challenges prevailing assumptions about Downtown retail and reframes the opportunity through a combination of creative data mining, coherent narrative and visual flourish, it would serve as a useful tool to landlords and brokers, particularly those ones educated in the "post -a -sign -and -wait -for -calls" school of retail leasing. The DMD is also prepared to take its role one step further by signing master leases for the ground -floor retail space in new mixed-use project(s), and then proceeding to "curate" the tenant mixes there by actively pursuing desired tenancies and offering below- market rents. Yet as much as this might be needed, and although the public / non-profit sector must be willing at this stage in Downtown's evolution to take high-risk positions until private interests are ready to do so, it would be breaking new ground for a BID, especially a fledgling and capacity -challenged one like the DMD. - Incentivizing retail, it might be argued, amounts to an attempt to "skip" certain stages in the revitalization process. As already discussed, this typically backfires, at least when the purpose is to overcome inadequate consumer demand, for the recipient, upon draining the full amount, will still likely fall victim to the limitations of the market. (And ongoing operating support is never recommended, given the risk of protecting lousy merchants and creating the conditions for "moral hazard"). Incentives can play a critical role, however, if the goal is to overcome risk aversion on the tenant side. Of course, subsidies should not be offered in categories where the consumer demand simply does not yet exist, but in ones where the findings have revealed nearer - term potential (above) and where the reluctance is driven by other factors, like perception or undercapitalization, such assistance actually helps to facilitate latent (yet very real) market opportunities. One might argue that certain categories warrant exceptions to this general approach, like, for instance, art galleries and studios, which, irrespective of their ability to generate sales, could help in changing perceptions about Downtown. However, while this might be true, other sources of financial support are presumably available for such uses, particularly if they are run as non -profits or, for that matter, sponsored by a new TAMU-CC School of Art (see above). - There is precedent for Corpus Christi to make use of so-called Chapter 380 agreements in pursuing catalytic anchors for its Downtown: as just one example, Fort Worth -based Trademark received $23 million in tax incentives for the renovation and expansion of the old Padre Staples Mall (now, La Palmera). This practice is well established across Texas: indeed, one of Corpus Christi's competitors for new development, the City of Robstown, is providing $38 million to the developers of The Outlets at Corpus Christi Bay. There is also the need, however, for a separate incentive geared towards early-stage entrepreneurs, perhaps using "Type A" funds. In addition to the existing Facade Improvement Grant program, modestly sized forgivable loans should be offered to help 13 defray the build -out costs incurred by small businesses, including not just prospects considering a new location but also, current merchants looking to improve or expand their operations. The availability of such funding can be critical: many landlords assume that a period of free rent is sufficient, but this presupposes that the entrepreneur can still somehow front amounts in the tens or hundreds of thousands. And while some continue to view an inability to secure start-up capital as a red flag of sorts, the recent revolution in micro - scaled retail and food service has shown how undercapitalization is not necessarily an indication of business acumen or a predictor of success. Finally, in light of the complicated political dynamics surrounding growth and development in Corpus Christi, this incentive pool should be funded by the established TIRZ that is specific to the Downtown, jointly administered by both the City and the DMD but with the latter as the "front man". And again, such monies should be used as "carrots" to incentivize businesses and locations that have been prioritized in the tenanting strategy (above). - Of course, retail revitalization in a Downtown setting is not only or even primarily a function of consumer demand and tenant attraction: it requires a far more comprehensive approach encompassing initiatives and improvements in a broad range of areas, and while the DMD can and should take a leadership role in championing and coordinating what needs to happen, much of it will ultimately depend on support from and collaboration between a host of other entities and stakeholders. Given, for example, the weak connectivity between Downtown's various districts, it will be especially important not just to establish and reinforce links to the extent possible — for pedestrians between the core and Uptown, for motorists negotiating the new Harbor Bridge, etc. — but also, to ensure and expand direct, relatively fast and frequent transit alternatives that provide access to key consumer sub -markets, such as out-of-town tourists. Another critical piece is personal safety. Even this element, however, is more complicated than it seems. Of course the DMD will be playing a "clean -and -safe" function, but perceptions are also influenced by various other factors, including the cosmetics of building facades, the age of store signage, the condition of basic infrastructure, the design and programming of public spaces, even the communication protocols in crisis situations. And while retail can, as explained earlier, play a pivotal role in growing rooftops and catalyzing revitalization, ultimately its performance will hinge on the markets for these other uses. Demand, for example, could exist for new housing but if the numbers do not pencil or the price point is not right, it will not materialize. And on a macro level, structural forces impacting the larger economy or certain industries (e.g. oil and gas) could accelerate, slow or halt the process. 14 In other words, retail revitalization, especially in a Downtown setting, is a marathon, not a sprint. Even in the frothiest of markets, there are countless variables and potential roadblocks, and there will be disappointments and setbacks. Furthermore, the only constant about retail is that it changes, constantly. Yet while staying the course carries no guarantee of a successful outcome, refusing to resolve upon one or failing to stick with it is more likely to result in failure. 15 11414141411 viVivoloovvovvovvoovoovvoovvoovvoovvoovvoovvoov 111,1JR, 11111,1 1111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 nummummummenumumon 1100000olooloolooloolooloolooloolovoovovoovovoov 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uululoulouuuooloolooloouuuoouuuoouuuoouuuloulolu 111111111111111111111111111111111 V 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Il 11111 olOVVOlovvovvovvoovovoovolovoloovolovoloovoloo 111111111111111111111111111111111 0000000000000000000000000000 uuluulul C ovoloommon 111111111111111111111111111111111W m IlllllllpupuumoumH,,,,^^ W 1.•••••••mmm 1111111 m 1� www ': _ 11111111111 Comm2 ,,,,,,,,,,iii,,,,,,,,,,,: Ms. Jaime Nodarse O to a1 a1 O a1 (a 0 2 Ms. Maureen Brooks Assistant Vice President of Treasurer Development Uptown Neighborhood Initiative Hillcrest-A.L. Leathers -Solomon Coles Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi Neighborhood Council, Nueces County Mr. Gabriel Guerra Community Action Agency Dr. Gilda Ramirez President -CC Market Westside Business Association, Kleberg Bank, Type A Board O _0 T E a1 co2 mc c U a) O a N N *' .,7 a a, U c O 3U N Q .i O es U U CCN c G D N z a i t U N E 2 Mr. Casey Lain Sage Properties Corporation, House of Rock, Bay Vista Developer Downtown Management District Board Mr. Brian Connor North Beach Community Association Mr. Brett Loeffler General Manager Mr. Gordon Robinson LAZ Parking Central Texas Mr. Omar Lopez Mr. Peter Davidson Corporate Communications Manager Marina Superintendent / Director Mr. Terry Sweeny Executive Director CC Downtown Management District Texas AEP, Dia de los Muertos, Homeless Advocate Mr. Bill Durrill Durrill Properties, SEA District CU °' 0 Mr. Rueben C. Medina N a, N c 0 (5 bA CO 0 U Q 0 U 0 0 CL Mr. Rocco Montesano CC Metropolitan Planning Organization Executive Director Hillcrest Residents Association U.S.S. Lexington Museum on the Bay AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 7, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Eddie Houlihan, Director of Management & Budget EddieHo@cctexas.com (361) 826-3792 Adoption of Proposed FY 2017-2018 Operating Budget CAPTION: Ordinance adopting the City of Corpus Christi operating budget for the fiscal year 2017-2018 beginning October 1, 2017; to be filed with the County Clerk; appropriating monies as provided in the budget; and providing for severance. PURPOSE: To adopt budget for upcoming fiscal year as per charter requirement. Section 102.007(c) of the Texas Local Government Code provides that adoption of a budget that will require raising more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year does require a separate vote of the City Council to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget. A vote under 102.007(c) is in addition to and separate from the vote to adopt the budget or the vote to set the tax rate. Therefore, a separate vote from City Council is required after each vote to adopt the budget: "Motion to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the FY 2017-2018 Operating Budget, that will raise more revenue from property taxes than in the previous fiscal year, as reflected in the adopted budget." BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: City Charter requires City Council to review and act on the Operating Budget on a yearly basis. ALTERNATIVES: None. Approval of the budget is required by the City Charter. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City Policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: This item requires two readings. The second reading will be at the regular September 26, 2017 City Council meeting. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Office of Management and Budget FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 876,546,131 876,546,131 BALANCE 876,546,131 876,546,131 Fund(s): All Operating Funds -Expenditures Comments: Total proposed expenditures are $876,546,131 and total proposed revenues are $880,104,035 which includes an increase of $4,034,005 in property tax revenues over the prior year. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Ordinance as submitted. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: FY 2017-2018 Budget Ordinance Schedule of Amendments AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2017; TO BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK; APPROPRIATING MONIES AS PROVIDED IN THE BUDGET; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE. WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi (City), pursuant to Article IV, Section 2 of the City Charter, did submit to the City Council a budget proposal (Budget Proposal) of the revenues of the City, and the expenses of conducting the affairs thereof for the ensuing fiscal year beginning October 1, 2017, and ending September 30, 2018, and which Budget Proposal had been compiled from detailed information from the several departments, divisions, offices of the City, in accordance with the City Charter provision referenced above; and WHEREAS, the members of the City Council have received and studied the City Manager's Budget Proposal and have called and held the proper hearing in accordance with Section 102.006, Texas Local Government Code, on the Budget Proposal; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(f), Article IV, of the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, the City Council must appropriate such sums of money as provided in the Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Budget of the City of Corpus Christi, covering proposed expenditures amounting to $876,546,131 and estimated revenues amounting to $880,104,035 for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2017, and ending September 30, 2018, as submitted by the City Manager, with modifications directed by the City Council and recorded in its minutes being incorporated by reference, is adopted. SECTION 2. That upon the passage of this ordinance certain sums of money from all sources of City revenues, as described in the Budget, shall be and they are appropriated to cover the sums for expenditures and investments as provided for each of the several funds in the Budget, as modified by the City Council. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, the City Manager is authorized to make transfers within departments, divisions, purposes, or funds, provided it is in accordance with applicable law. SECTION 3. Police Officer Positions The number of positions authorized for each police officer classification in the Police Department shall be: Police officer and senior police officer - 436* Police Lieutenant - 39 Police Captain - 16 Police Commander - 4 Assistant Police Chief - 3 Police Chief - 1 FY17-18 TOTAL 499 * These positions are interchangeable. Any police officer may become a senior police officer after 60 months' service by passing a pass/fail exam. This number may be temporarily increased by graduates from a police academy authorized by the City Manager, which temporary increase shall be reduced to budgeted total through attrition. SECTION 4. Firefighter Positions The number of positions authorized for each firefighter classification in the Fire Department shall be: Firefighter I - 110* Firefighter II —EMS — 133 Firefighter II — Engineer - 73 Fire Captain - 79 Battalion Chief - 13 Assistant Fire Chief - 4 Deputy Fire Chief - 1 Fire Chief - 1 FY17-18 TOTAL 414 *This number may be temporarily increased by graduates from a fire academy authorized by the City Manager, which temporary increase shall be reduced to budgeted total through attrition. SECTION 5. That upon final passage of this budget ordinance, a true certified copy of this same ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Manager to the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas, pursuant to Section 102.011, Texas Local Government Code. The budget shall also be part of the archives of the City. SECTION 6. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision in this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Mayor McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opal That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Mayor McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opal PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Attachment A - Schedule of Adjustments City of Corpus Christi Amendments to the FY 2017-2018 Proposed Budget TOTAL PROPOSED REVENUES TOTAL PROPOSED EXPENDITURES SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $ 880,104,035 $ 876,546,131 Reinvestment Zone No. 2 - 1111 Proposed Expenditures Adjustments: Removal of Funding for Packery Patrol Total Adjusted Expenditures $ 1,487,496 (89,500) 1,397,996 Visitors Facilities - 4710 Proposed Expenditures Adjustments: Transfer to Arena Fund Total Adjusted Expenditures $ 11,753,236 1,222,916 12,976,152 TOTAL PROPOSED AMENDED REVENUES TOTAL PROPOSED AMENDED EXPENDITURES $ 880,104,035 $ 877,679,547 uuuuuuouo6 11111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 September 19, 2017 lIonoinnin lIonoinnin 111 1111111111111 1111111111 I 01111111111111111 N M N N CO • M 14 C1 1'1 00 ✓ i M M 00 00 Q1 M M ci 0 p •N ,� Cl CO 1-1,-1 00 O C\ M O 1-1 izi '' � - N M M N 0\ ! M M '-' CO N o0 M N ,-i Mri '� N M U � • Vl V/ C� N • .j ate-+ r--� w U rai 1-4 Ct 6.100 111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14000000000000000000000000000000000000 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111 11�IIIIRI OWON 1 111 iii 1111111 II .71 r N C C1) .71 in▪ j co GO Cm) $88o,io4,o35 REU 8888JiiH lli aim hp INK .1111111111111111, MeV 1111 M rn t1 111111111111111114 230,260,997 232,507,749 CO ▪ 1-I vp • VD G O , N Lv CVI - 00 N 1-1 C1) L O Co Co 283,283,043 124,443,737 IV N Ov GO GO CV Cir) LC CO • ct v N- ' $861,135,797 $921,561,o81 Ipuuuuuuuul�llluuuuuuu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 Iluuuuuuuml�llluuuuuuu muuuuuuuu1 11111 Vup,i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 coO cns C'7 N 112,173,529 1- cn O oo N 1-9 cn Cc N O oo N OS i N O ca, cn cy O p\ r') CO 7r c2 co L i 1- N N co ri ,moi N Cc 1 C'7 • , -i ii $902,134,669 $942,645,865 O\ O\ C7 CV co co ri O co O\ N 00O ,-, O CV .co C7 � N • ,� G O N c 000 N CV $891,912,230 0 uuuuuuulMlllE11111uuo uuuuuumf 111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuum�uuuuuuo 1111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuum NEI uuuuuumdluumuuumi4 011 011 1111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuumf D11 lonoomoomoolif 0 Reinvestment Zone MM� •4 ;--1 ^� 0 0 0 •4 +44 0 N <3‘ N •'—' 4) 4a 4) AGENDA MEMORANDUM Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 20, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Eddie Houlihan, Director of Management & Budget EddieHo@cctexas.com (361) 826-3792 Ordinance to ratify increase of $4,034,005 in property tax revenues from last year's operating budget as reflected in the 2017-2018 operating budget; and declaring an emergency CAPTION: Ordinance to ratify increase of $4,034,005 in property tax revenues from last year's operating budget as reflected in the 2017-2018 operating budget; and declaring an emergency. PURPOSE: To adopt budget for upcoming fiscal year as per charter requirement. Section 102.007(c) of the Texas Local Government Code provides that adoption of a budget that will require raising more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year does require a separate vote of the City Council to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget. A vote under 102.007(c) is in addition to and separate from the vote to adopt the budget or the vote to set the tax rate. Therefore, a separate vote from City Council is required after each vote to adopt the budget. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: City Charter requires City Council to review and act on the Operating Budget on a yearly basis. ALTERNATIVES: None. Approval of the budget is required by the City Charter. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City Policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: N/A DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Office of Management and Budget FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 4,034,005 4,034,005 BALANCE 4,034,005 4,034,005 Fund(s): All Operating Funds -Expenditures Comments: Total proposed proposed revenues are $880,104,035 which includes an increase of $4,034,005 in property tax revenues over the prior year. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Ordinance as submitted. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: FY 2017-2018 Ordinance to ratify Ordinance to ratify increase of $4,034,005 in property tax revenues from last year's operating budget as reflected in the 2017-2018 operating budget; and declaring an emergency Whereas, Section 102.007 (c) of the Texas Local Government Code provides that adoption of a budget that will require raising more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year requires a separate vote of the governing body to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget and that a vote under this subsection is in addition to and separate from the vote to adopt the budget or a vote to set the tax rate; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Council ratifies the increase of $4,034,005 in property tax revenues from last year's operating budget as reflected in the 2017-2018 Operating Budget. SECTION 2. Upon the written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council: (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this 26th day of September, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor day of , 2017 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Council Members Joe McComb Mayor The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 23, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Construction Contract North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 BOND 2014, Proposition 2 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Mo -Con Services, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $446,996.46 for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 for Total Base bid plus Additive Alternate No.1 and Additive Alternate No. 2. (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 3A. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project was approved as part of Bond 2014 Proposition 2 Street Safety, Revitalization and Capacity Improvement projects on November 4, 2014. Beach Access Road 2 is located on North Padre Island starting at STH 361 and extends approximately 1,470 linear feet, to the beach. The project is on Mustang Island, approximately 7.5 miles north of the Park Road 22 / 361 intersection, providing access from 361 to the beach. The access road is experiencing significant distress from age, sand migration and tidal influences. Beach Access Road 3A was bid separately and constructed in March 2017. Construction projects located on the beach require coordination with many governing agencies and committees. Both projects were presented to and sanctioned by: • United States Army Corps of Engineers, • Texas General Land Office, • Nueces County Dune Committee, • Beach Management Advisory Committee, • Island Strategic Action Committee, • Watershore and Beach Advisory Committee, and • City of Corpus Christi Parks and Recreation Department. The Nueces County Dune Committee required construction of Access Road 2 take place in the October 2017 to December 2017 timeframe as part of the Permit requirements to avoid overlapping the construction schedule on Access Road 3A and to avoid the peak tourist season. The project Base Bid provides for replacement of existing Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete (HMAC) roadway with new Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), grading, slope and soil stabilization, pavement markings, and signage within the same location on the beach as the existing roadway. Additive Alternative No. 1 changed the end -treatment from cement stabilized shoulders to altering grade on the final 100' at the shoreline approach. Both treatments were alternatives to mitigate formation of a scour hole at the terminus of the roadway. Additive Alternative No. 2 provides for a new 2" PVC waterline adjacent to the roadway connecting to a gate valve and box near the limit of the project, for a future shower installation. This project is anticipated to take approximately 90 calendar days after the Notice to Proceed is issued. During construction, the contractor is required to provide continual access to emergency vehicles. On August 2, 2017, the City received proposals from three (3) bidders as follows: Contractor Base Bid Additive Alternate 1 Additive Alternate 2 Total Mo -Con Services Corpus Christi, Texas $437,307.59 -$5,661.00 $15,349.90 $446,996.49 Jimmy Evans Company Austin, Texas $401,567.00 -$10,980.00 $74,220.00 $464,807.00 JE Construction Services Corpus Christi, Texas $470,516.00 -$26,840.00 $28,904.00 $472,580.00 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Govind Development, LLC is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2014-08. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $3,549,300 $3,549,300 Encumbered / Expended Amount 643,238 643,238 This item 491,695 491,695 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 205,291 205,291 BALANCE $2,906,062 (696,986) $2,209,076 Fund(s): Street Bond 2014, Proposition 2. Comments: RECOMMENDATION: City staff and Govind Development recommend the construction contract be awarded to Mo -Con Services, Inc. in the amount of $446,996.49 for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 for Total Base bid plus Additive Alternate No. 1 and Additive Alternate No. 2. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Letter of Recommendation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 2 and 3A Bond 2014, Proposition 2 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street CIP, Bond 2014, Proposition 2 $ 3,500,000 Storm Water CIP 49,300 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 3,549,300 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: (Phase 2) 491,695.00 Construction Road 2 (Mo -Con Services) THIS ITEM 446,996 Contingency (10%) 44,699 Construction Inspection and Testing• 25,826.00 Construction Inspection (Estimate) 17,020 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (Tolunay-Wong) 8,806 Design• 152,570 Engineer (Govind) Preliminary Design 49,200 Engineer (Govind) Engineering Design and Amendment No. 1 90,085 Design Phase - Geotechnical Services (Tolunay-Wong) Road 3A and 2 13,285 Design, Construction, Inspection and Testing• 490,668 North Padre Island Beach Access Road 3A (Complete) Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements (Both Projects) 179,465 Contract Administration (Engineering Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 70,986 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt/Staff Augmentation) 106,479 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 2,000 TOTAL $ 1,340,224 * ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 2,209,076 NUECES BAY SCALE: N.T.S. CORPUS CHRISTI PROJECT LOCATION CORPUS CHRISTI BAY TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI LAGUNA MADRE GULF OF MEXICO LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Number: E16452 North Padre Island Beach Access Rd 2, Bond 2014, Proposition 2 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 Bond 2014, Proposition 2 11111111,111111111 Access Road 2 Access Road 3A talM. North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 - Cross Sections Q. LLIU U � Q U O LL� z� WW ›W J gt D ow z• W 1cc — zz 0 UU hiMMIYALTO UW a) 0 U cr ^V N ca d) 4J CC v CU U (/) C CU L 0 U U U U v U +-1 E ca ccs a) CO Q U cn -0 -0 a C c ca N 2 L_ 0 v o -0 =co a) c N a--1 a--+ 0 z cu ca a) O > c ca O E O c/) C) c ca a —, v a� 0_2 U U 2 Q CU CC > U 0 ,c • Grading for surface drainage, slope and soil stabilization, Pavement markings, and signage. end -treatment O ca cuc -0 0 ca hL M � 4A O c U v ca cu 4J ca a--+ O OCU v) O C cu coccs 0 UO 0 v) v o a z Q aA a-+ CU cu co co O c N +� cu v Q ca O Q cucu -0 i U c :+7J v -0 O v v a�4-1 4-1 • • • UW Project Schedule O N Z 0 CO• Construction Estimate: 90 days OV/ND DEVELOPMENT, LLC . NC`IN Cn"11 "�" DIVISION August 4, 2017 City of Corpus Christi Engineering Services P.O. BOX 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 Attn: Jeff Edmonds, P.E., Director of Engineering Services Re: NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROAD 2 City of Corpus Christi Project No E16452 (BOND 2014) Letter of Recommendation — Award of Contract Dear Mr. Edmonds, We have reviewed the three (3) bids received on August 2, 2017 for North Padre Island Beach Access Road 2 City of Corpus Christi Project No- El 6452 (Bond 2014). The project consists of full reconstruction of Access Road 2 including additive alternates to "counter -sink" the new concrete pavement at the beach and install a new waterline for future beach improvements. The bidders were Mo -Con Services, Inc (Mo -Con), Jimmy Evans Company and JE Construction Services. Mo -Con and JE are from Corpus Christi, TX and Jimmy Evans is from Austin, TX. The three (3) bids have been evaluated and a Bid Tabulation has been prepared (see attached). The low bidder is Mo -Con Services, Inc with a Total Base plus Additive Alternate No. 1 and Additive Alternate No. 2 Bid of S446,996.49. We are in receipt of Mo -Con's Statement of Experience (SOE) and Mo -Con has not completed any projects for the City of Corpus Christi in their short existence (est. in 2014). Mo -Con has successfully completed projects for Nueces County and the City of Bishop over the past year and Mo -Con's President, Ruben Moya, has successfully completed projects in 2001 and 2002 for the City of Corpus Christi with his previous company, Moya Construction, Inc. Mo - Con's management team has extensive experience in roadway construction and is suitable for the project. Based upon our evaluation of the bids and SOEs, Govind Development, LLC recommends award of the project to Mo - Con Services, Inc. for the following bid amount: TOTAL BASE PLUS ADD. ALTERNATES 1 AND 2 BID S446,996.49 If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please contact our office. Respectfully, Marcos Ybarra, P.E. Let.d Civil Engineer Govind Development, LLC Encl. — Bid Tabulation, Statement of Experience 9510 Leopard St • Corpus Christi, TX 78410 • Ph 361 241-2777 • Fax 361 356-4384 • www.govinddevelopment.com Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission wwvv.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-256219 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Mo -Con Services, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16452 NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROAD 2 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary ) 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. DIANE T. POLLARD . . My Notary ID # 130992381 Expires February 3, 2021 AFFIX Sworn 20 NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE to and subscribed before me, by the said 4 , to certify which, witness my hand Signature „tben (not of au h rized agent of contracting business entity , , this the ,,,,,),.: el„) day of and seal of office. i' tile, i . I 1 )1 idAd_- , , , Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of o7 dministering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission wwvv.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 21, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Construction Contract Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue Bond 2014 Proposition 1 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with MAX Underground Construction, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $3,844,135.12 for Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue for a total Base Bid 2 (flexible pavement). (Bond 2014 Proposition 1) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for the Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue Project. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Bond 2014 Brochure description: "Staples Street from Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue — This project includes full -depth repair of the existing undivided four lane roadway. Although this roadway is designated as a A-1 Minor Arterial in the Urban Transportation Plan (four travel lanes with continuous center turn lane), consideration is being given to design the roadway as modified C-3 Primary Collector (four travel lanes) due to existing right-of-way constructions and traffic conditions. Other improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, and pavement markings." Project Scope: This project connects the last 2,000 linear feet of Staples Street (Bond 2012) to the 6 -points intersection segment at Alameda Street, using the available 80' right of way as a C3 collector. On- street parking is preserved with four -lanes of traffic, having no width for a continuous center turn lane. From Public Meeting feedback, local businesses expressed their preference for the 4 -lane option, as opposed to a 3 -lane option with center turn -lane, with subsequent city council approval. Proposed work consists of full -depth reconstruction and underground utilities with no bike lanes, from lip to lip of existing curb and gutter. Recently reconstructed existing sidewalk and curb and gutter will remain. New underground storm water, water, wastewater, and IT will be provided. The new storm water system will be installed beneath the northbound lane, with inlets and laterals placed at existing street -profile low points. Additional minor improvements include pavement markings, gas connections, RTA bus pad, signage, and ADA accessibility. The project was advertised with alternate base bids for both Hot -Mix -Asphalt -Concrete (HMAC) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). The Engineering Services policy on making award recommendations when projects are bid with both HMAC and PCC pavements is to recommend PCC if it is within $100,000/lane-mile of the HMAC bid. The total paved area on this project is equivalent to 1.85 lane -miles so the recommendation would be to award the PCC alternative if the PCC bid differential were within $185,000 of the HMAC bid. The low PCC bid was $865,235 higher than the low HMAC bid. Since the bid differential exceeds the additional amount of $185,000 that lifecycle cost analysis would justify paying for PCC, Engineering is recommending the award of Base Bid 2 for HMAC pavement. Morgan Avenue is under current design from Ocean to Crosstown Expressway, and will capture the intersection with Staples Street in the construction sequence, to be deferred until work on Ocean Drive and Christus Spohn Hospital is completed. The 6 -points intersection project will be bid as a stand-alone project after the other project work in the area is nearing substantial completion. The project was developed with two base bids on August 8, 2017, and the City received proposals from four (4) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid 1 PCC Base Bid 2 HMAC MAX Underground Construction, LLC Corpus Christi, Texas No Bid $3,844,135.12 Berry Contracting, LLC dba Bay, Ltd. Corpus Christi, Texas No Bid $4,175,836.23 Jhabores Construction Co., Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas $4,709,370.60 $4,526,249.01 Reytec Construction Resources, Inc. Houston, Texas $5,167,453.00 No Bid Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost $5,443,048.55 $4,315,289.75 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: HDR Engineering, Inc., is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2013-01. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $607,470 $5,073,630.00 $5,681,100.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount 607,470 0.00 607,470.00 This item 3,844,135.12 3,844,135.12 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 815,677.51 815,677.51 BALANCE $0 $413,817.37 $413,817.37 Fund(s): Street and Utility CIP Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and HDR Engineering, Inc., recommend the construction contract be awarded to MAX Underground Construction, LLC in the amount of $3,844,135.12 for the total Base Bid 2. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Letter of Recommendation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Staples Street Alameda Drive to Morgan Avenue BOND 2014 Proposition 1 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street BOND 2014 Proposition 1 2,900,000 Storm Water CIP 1,404,147 Wastewater CIP 656,325 Water CIP 700,828 Gas 19,800 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,681,100 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Fees: Construction (MAX Underground Construction) THIS ITEM 3,844,135 Streets 1,723,038 Utilities 2,121,097 Storm Water 1,071,080 Water 537,456 Wastewater 492,761 Gas 19,800 Contingency (10%) 384,414 Construction Inspection and Testing Fees. 203,021 Construction Inspection (Estimate) 170,433 Construction Materials Testing 32,588 Design Fees 607,470 Engineering Design (HDR) Original and Amendment No. 1 607,470 Streets 307,635 Utilities 299,835 Storm Water 149,918 Water 71,960 Wastewater 77,957 Reimbursement Fees. 228,243 Contract Administration (Eng. Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 85,216 Engineering Services (Project Mgt) 142,027 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000 TOTAL 5,267,283 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE 413,817 SCALE: N.T.S. CORPUS CHRISTI BAY TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI NAVAL AIR STATION FLOUR BLUFF LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE LAGUNA MADRE Project Number: E13094 Staples St Alameda St to Morgan Ave (Bond 2014) CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES 01 1 rtu '+off" U CU ca CU .0 CL U UJ 11111111,111111111 (ir U y oc UW Project Location UW Project Vicinity 1Jlj?!i;,;iV9 C/1 u .O •• • • u vi zzh Illuluo o Cn uly�ll�lllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�f f li;;;;;;tulultlumib IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII I II III'°IIIIIN��IUII!!Illltfl'I b Ili ullllllllllll ullllllllulil11IIIIliI 11111 pi""',111111111uuuuuuu,,, I1,1111111''IIIaH U lllttttttttttttt11111ll'IUJ " 1111111111111111111111111111111,111111111111111111 •Y 0 UW 0 (f) (f)cn CA 0 U (r).� H TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE TR ■ ■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII C ■ PRIME COAT ;,„D a) • New storm water, water, wastewater, and IT provided • ADA accessibility and RTA pad • Bid both rigid and flexible • New pavement markings and signage • (ir U y oc UW Project Schedule CO N ti N co 0 co Construction Estimate: CO H5u1inc.aoit August 21, 2017 10020140 Mr. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi PO Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Reference: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD RECOMMENDATION STAPLES STREET FROM ALAMEDA TO MORGAN AVE, BOND 2014 PROJECT NO. E13094 Dear Mr. Edmonds: HDR Engineering has reviewed and tabulated the bids for the referenced project. There were four bidders for the project; MAX Underground Construction, LLC, Bay Ltd., Jhabores Construction Co., Inc., Clark Pipeline Services, and Reytec Construction Resources, Inc. MAX Underground Construction, LLC was the apparent low bidder, with the following bids: • Base Bid 1 (Rigid Pavement) = NO BID • Base Bid 2 (Flexible Pavement) = $3,844,135.12 As stated above, MAX Underground Construction, LLC (MAX) did not submit a bid for Base Bid 1, which was not a requirement to bid on the subject project, and the low bid was for Flexible HMAC Pavement. MAX personnel appear to have the requisite experience and have performed utility and street construction for private development projects and City of Corpus Christi projects. The HDR team contacted some of MAX's references to elicit feedback, and did not receive any feedback that indicates MAX is not capable of performing the work. Their history of experience illustrates that their projects are increasingly growing in scope and complexity, and the subject project appears to be a good fit for MAX undertake. HDR recommends that the contract be awarded to MAX Underground Construction, LLC, for Base Bid 2 — Flexible HMAC Pavement, in the total amount of $3,844,135.12, provided that funds are available. If you have any questions, please contact our office (361) 696-3300. Sincerely, HDR Engineering, Inc. Anthony Gav , P.E. Project Man ger CC: Chris Hale, P.E. Jerry Shoemaker, P.E. Attachments: 1. Contractor Submittal — MAX Underground Construction, LLC 555 N. Carancahua, Suite 1600, Corpus Christi, TX 78401-0849 (361) 696-3300 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested partes. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-256147 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place ot business. MAX Underground Construction, LLC Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being Ned. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identity the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E.13094 Staples Street from Alameda Street to Morgan Ave (Bond 2014) 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 FF, V4 , MARGARET ROSE RUSSO g • ' Notary Public, "tate of Texas N t yl ,'O99 I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. % 5aAtezd., Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before ole, by the said Maximiliano Salinas , this the 15,t day of September, 20 17 to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. ..—, Margaret Rose Russo PM ,.1 ...wd. , officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.lx.us Version V1.0.3337 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: TO: August 31, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Executive Director of Water Utilities dang@cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Jeff H. Edmonds, P.E., Director, Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Master Service Agreement Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Major Ditch Improvements (Capital Improvement Program) CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Master Service Agreement (MSA) with Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. (LAN) of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $300,000 for IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) Major Ditch Improvements. (Capital Improvement Program) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to authorize an MSA for professional services to develop and implement the IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements project. CIP DESCRIPTION: "The City has approximately 100 miles of major ditches. As part of a programmatic approach to implement lifecycle improvements, this project will identify and prioritize ditch improvements to include re -grading, slope recontouring and stabilization, pilot channels and concrete lining upgrades, and other best management practices. These improvements will address critical upgrades to improve drainage on public and private property, improve public safety, improve water quality, and reduce long term maintenance costs. This is a yearly program that will provide improvements to major ditches located throughout the City to the extent that funding allows." BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project includes evaluation, prioritization, and hydraulic modeling of major ditches to develop construction methodologies and strategies to reduce flooding and maintenance costs. The project also includes preparation of the IDIQ construction documents to implement recommended improvements through multiple Delivery Orders (DO's) "work orders". The DO's will be prepared by the engineer and issued to the contractor based on the contractor's unit bid prices. The MSA contract provides the basic scope, terms, and conditions that govern future DO's. The design engineer will use the FEMA model to evaluate the current conditions and develop the most cost effective strategies to improve the drainage for the specific major ditch. The total DO's will not exceed the MSA contract value and will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or designee. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a master service agreement. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a master service agreement. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This master service agreement and selection process comply with the Professional Procurement Act and City Policy. LAN was selected by RFQ 2016-01. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utility Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount 45,660 45,660 This item 300,000 300,000 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 145,275 145,275 *BALANCE $1,509,065 $1,509,065 Fund(s): Storm Water CIP #02 Comments: * Balanced will be used for future construction TBD RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the master service agreement with Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. in the amount of $300,000 for the IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements project. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Master Service Agreement Location Map Form 1295 Presentation BUDGET WORKSHEET IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Storm Water CIP Funds $ 2,000,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 2,000,000 PROJECT FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Fees: Construction (Estimate) TBD Contingency (10%) TBD Construction Inspection and Testing Fees. TBD Construction Inspection (estimate) TBD Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (estimate) TBD Design, Right of Way Acquisition and Plan Review. 345,660 Preliminary Engineering Design (LAN) 45,660 Master Service Agreement (LAN) THIS ITEM 300,000 Reimbursement Fees and Miscellaneous. 145,275 Contract Administration (Eng. Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 57,700 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 86,575 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000 TOTAL $ 490,935 * ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 1,509,065 * Balanced will be used for future construction TBD CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES For the E12191 IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements This Agreement is between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee and Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. (LAN), a Texas Corporation, 500 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 500, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401(Consultant). TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE NO. TITLE PAGE ARTICLE I PROJECT TASK ORDER 2 ARTICLE II COMPENSATION 2 ARTICLE III QUALITY CONTROL PLAN 4 ARTICLE IV INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 4 ARTICLE V INDEMNIFICATION 4 ARTICLE VI TERM; RENEWALS; TIMES FOR RENDERING SERVICE 5 ARTICLE VII TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 5 ARTICLE VIII RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT 6 ARTICLE IX OWNER REMEDIES 6 ARTICLE X CONSULTANT REMEDIES 7 ARTICLE XI CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 7 ARTICLE XII MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9 EXHIBITS Page 1 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC ARTICLE I — PROJECT TASK ORDER 1.1 This Agreement shall apply to as many tasks as City and Consultant agree will be performed under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Each task Consultant performs for City hereunder shall be designated a Task Order. No Task Order shall be binding or enforceable unless and until it has been properly executed by both City and Consultant. Each properly executed Task Order shall become a separate supplemental agreement to this Agreement. 1.2 The Consultant shall provide its Scope of Services, to be included in each Task Order. The Scope of Services shall include all associated services required for Consultant to provide such Services, pursuant to this Agreement, and any and all Services which would normally be required by law or common due diligence in accordance with the standard of care defined in Article XII of this Agreement. The approved Scope of Services defines the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement. 1.3 Under this Agreement, Consultant will provide services on a Task Order basis for a range of services related to assisting Engineering Services with professional engineering, architecture and construction services related to execution of Capital Improvements Programs. All work will be subject to authorization from City. A detailed Scope of Services and fee estimate will be developed for each task prior to execution of work. 1.4 Consultant shall follow City Codes and Standards, as applicable, throughout the duration of the Project, unless specifically and explicitly excluded from doing so in the approved Task Order. At review milestones, the Consultant and City will review the progress to ensure that City Codes and Standards are followed. A request made by either party to deviate from City standards after the contract is executed must be in writing. 1.5 Consultant must perform tasks and submit deliverables as detailed in each approved Task Order. 1.6 Consultant must provide all labor, equipment and transportation necessary to complete all services agreed to in a timely manner throughout the term of the Agreement. Persons retained by Consultant to perform work pursuant to this Agreement shall be employees or subconsultants of Consultant. Upon request, Consultant must provide City with a list of all subconsultants that includes the services performed by the subconsultant and the percentage of work performed by the subconsultant (in dollars). Changes in Consultant's proposed team as specified in the Scope of Services, SOQ, or other Task Order document must be agreed to by the City in writing. 1.7 Consultant must not begin work on any Task Order authorized under this Agreement until they are briefed on the scope of the Project and are notified in writing to proceed. 1.8 For design services, Consultant agrees to render the professional services necessary for the advancement of the Project through Final Completion of the Construction Contract. Consultant acknowledges and accepts its responsibilities, as defined and described in the City's General Conditions for Construction Contracts, an excerpt of which is attached as Exhibit G. ARTICLE II — COMPENSATION 2.1 The Compensation for all services included in this Agreement and in the Scope of Services for this Agreement shall not exceed $300,000. 2.2 The Consultant's fee for each Task Order will be on a lump sum or time and materials (T&M) basis with a negotiated not -to -exceed amount. The fees will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined in each Task Order, and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. Page 2 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC 2.3 Consultant shall submit a proposal to the City, which shall be incorporated into this agreement as Exhibit B, subject to approval by the City. 2.4 Consultant shall submit a Rate Schedule, shown in Exhibit B-1, with their proposal. The rate schedule shall remain confidential pursuant to section 552.104 of the Texas Government Code since release of this information would give advantage to a competitor or bidder. In addition, section 552.110 of the TX Govt. Code protects third party commercial and financial information if release of the information would cause the third party substantial competitive harm. 2.5 Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with the Payment Request (Exhibit C). For T&M basis fees, Consultant shall submit documentation with the monthly invoice that shows who worked on the Project, the number of hours that each individual worked on the Project and reimbursables for that individual. 2.5.1 Principals may only bill at the hourly rate of Principals when acting in that capacity. Principals acting in the capacity of staff must bill at staff rates. The Consultant shall provide documentation with each payment request that clearly indicates how that individual's time is allocated and the justification for that allocation. 2.6 The anticipated fee structure under this agreement is as follows: 2.7 All services shall be performed and the applicable standard of professional care set forth herein and to City's satisfaction, which satisfaction shall be judged by the Director in his/her sole discretion. City shall not be liable for any payment under this Agreement for services which are unsatisfactory and which previously have not been approved by the Director. 2.8 In the event of any dispute(s) between the Parties regarding the amount properly compensable for any Task Order or as final compensation or regarding any amount that may be withheld by City, Consultant shall be required to make a claim pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and follow the procedures provided herein for the resolution of such dispute. In the event Consultant, does not initiate and follow the claims procedures provided in this Agreement in a timely manner and as required by the terms thereof, any such claim shall be waived. 2.9 Request of final compensation by Consultant shall constitute a waiver of claims except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant as unsettled at the time of final Payment Request. 2.10 Any fee payable under this Agreement is subject to the availability of funds. The Consultant may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. The right to suspend work under this provision does not relieve the City of its obligation to make payments in accordance with section 2.5 above for services provided up to the date of suspension. Page 3 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE \E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC DESCRIPTION NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT Maximum Contract Amount $300,000.00 Task 1 — TBD TBD Task 2 — TBD TBD Task 3 — TBD TBD Task 4 — TBD TBD Task 5 — TBD TBD Task 6 — TBD TBD 2.7 All services shall be performed and the applicable standard of professional care set forth herein and to City's satisfaction, which satisfaction shall be judged by the Director in his/her sole discretion. City shall not be liable for any payment under this Agreement for services which are unsatisfactory and which previously have not been approved by the Director. 2.8 In the event of any dispute(s) between the Parties regarding the amount properly compensable for any Task Order or as final compensation or regarding any amount that may be withheld by City, Consultant shall be required to make a claim pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and follow the procedures provided herein for the resolution of such dispute. In the event Consultant, does not initiate and follow the claims procedures provided in this Agreement in a timely manner and as required by the terms thereof, any such claim shall be waived. 2.9 Request of final compensation by Consultant shall constitute a waiver of claims except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant as unsettled at the time of final Payment Request. 2.10 Any fee payable under this Agreement is subject to the availability of funds. The Consultant may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. The right to suspend work under this provision does not relieve the City of its obligation to make payments in accordance with section 2.5 above for services provided up to the date of suspension. Page 3 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE \E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC ARTICLE 111 — QUALITY CONTROL PLAN 3.1 The Consultant agrees to perform quality assurance -quality control/constructability reviews (QCP Review). The City reserves the right to retain a separate consultant to perform additional QCP services for the City. 3.2 The Consultant will perform QCP Reviews at intervals during the project to ensure deliverables satisfy applicable industry quality standards and meet the requirements of the project scope. Based on the findings of the QCP Review, the Consultant must reconcile the project scope and Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) as needed. 3.3 Documents that do not meet City Codes and Standards in effect at the time of the execution of the Task Order may be rejected. If final construction documents are found not to be in compliance with this Agreement or the Task Order, Consultant will not be compensated for having to resubmit documents. ARTICLE IV — INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Consultant must not commence work under this Agreement until all required insurance has been obtained, and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 4.2 Insurance Requirements are shown in EXHIBIT D. ARTICLE V - INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, or employees, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement. Page 4 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC ARTICLE VI — TERM; RENEWALS; TIMES FOR RENDERING SERVICE 6.1 This Agreement shall be effective upon the signature of the City Manager or designee (Effective Date). 6.2 This Agreement shall be applicable to Task Order issued hereunder from the Effective Date of the Agreement until project is complete. 6.3 This service shall be for a period of years beginning on the Effective Date. The Agreement may be renewed for up to one year renewal options upon mutual agrccmcnt of thc partics to be cvidcnccd in writing prior to thc cxpiration datc of the prior term. Any renewals shall be at the same terms and conditions, plus any approved changes. 6.4 The times for performing services or providing deliverables will be stated in each Task Order. If no times are so stated, Consultant will perform services and provide deliverables within a reasonable time. ARTICLE VII - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 7.1 By Consultant: 7.1.1 The City reserves the right to suspend this Agreement at the end of any phase for the convenience of the City by issuing a written and signed Notice of Suspension. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement for convenience in the event such suspension extends for a period beyond 120 calendar days by delivering a Notice of Termination to the City. 7.1.2 The Consultant must follow the Termination Procedure outlined in this Agreement. 7.2 By City: 7.2.1 The City may terminate this agreement for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. 7.2.2 The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. If the Consultant again fails to perform under this agreement, the City may terminate the agreement for cause upon seven days written notice to the Consultant with no additional cure period. If the City terminates for cause, the City may reject any and all proposals submitted by Consultant for up to two years. 7.3 Termination Procedure 7.3.1 Upon receipt of a Notice of Termination and prior to the effective date of termination, unless the notice otherwise directs or Consultant takes action to cure a failure to perform under the cure period, Consultant shall immediately begin the phase-out and discontinuance of all services in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Within 30 calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Termination, unless Consultant has successfully cured a failure to perform, Consultant shall submit a statement showing in detail the services performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. City retains the option to grant an extension to the time period for submittal of such statement. 7.3.2 Consultant shall submit all completed and/or partially completed work under this Agreement, including but not limited to specifications, designs, plans and exhibits. Page 5 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC 7.3.3 Upon receipt of documents described in the Termination Procedure and absent any reason why City may be compelled to withhold fees, Consultant will be compensated for its services based upon a Time & Materials calculation or Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. There will be no compensation for anticipated profits on services not completed. 7.3.4 Consultant acknowledges that City is a public entity and has a duty to document the expenditure of public funds. The failure of Consultant to comply with the submittal of the statement and documents, as required above, shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any and all rights or claims to payment for services performed under this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII — RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT 8.1 Consultant grants City, or its designees, the right to audit, examine or inspect, at City's election, all of Consultant's records relating to the performance of the Work under this Agreement, during the term of this Agreement and retention period herein. The audit, examination or inspection may be performed by a City designee, which may include its internal auditors or an outside representative engaged by City. Consultant agrees to retain its records for a minimum of four (4) years following termination of the Agreement, unless there is an ongoing dispute under this Agreement, then such retention period shall extend until final resolution of the dispute. 8.2 "Consultant's records" include any and all information, materials and data of every kind and character generated as a result of the Work under this Agreement. Examples include billings, books, general ledger, cost ledgers, invoices, production sheets, documents, correspondence, meeting notes, subscriptions, agreements, purchase orders, leases, contracts, commitments, arrangements, notes, daily diaries, reports, drawings, receipts, vouchers, memoranda, time sheets, payroll records, policies, procedures, federal and state tax filings for issue in questions and any and all other agreements, sources of information and matters that may, in City's judgment, have any bearing on or pertain to any matters, rights, duties or obligations under or covered by any Agreement Documents. 8.3 City agrees that it shall exercise the right to audit, examine or inspect Consultant's records only during City's regular business hours. Consultant agrees to allow City's designee access to all of Consultant's records, Consultant's facilities and Consultant's current or former employees, deemed necessary by City or its designee(s), to perform such audit, inspection or examination. Consultant also agrees to provide adequate and appropriate work space necessary to City or its designees to conduct such audits, inspections or examinations. 8.4 Consultant shall include this audit clause in any subcontractor, supplier or vendor contract. ARTICLE IX—OWNER REMEDIES 9.1 The City and Consultant agree that in the event the City suffers actual damages, the City may elect to pursue its actual damages and any other remedy allowed by law. This includes but is not limited to: 9.1.1 Failure of the Consultant to make adequate progress and endanger timely and successful completion of the Project, which includes failure of subconsultants to meet contractual obligations; 9.1.2 Failure of the Consultant to design in compliance with the laws of the City, State and/or federal governments, such that subsequent compliance costs exceed expenditures that would have been involved had services been properly executed by the Consultant. Page 6 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC 9.1.3 Losses are incurred because of defects, errors and omissions in the design, working drawings, specifications or other documents prepared by the Consultant to the extent that the financial losses are greater than the City would have originally paid had there not been defects, errors and omissions in the documents. 9.2 When the City incurs non -value added work costs for change orders due to design errors or omissions, the City will send the Consultant a letter that includes: (1) Summary of facts with supporting documentation; (2) Instructions for Consultant to revise design documents, if appropriate, at Consultant's expense; (3) Calculation of non -value added work costs incurred by the City; and (4) Deadline for Consultant's response. 9.3 The Consultant may be required to revise bid documents and re -advertise the Project at the Consultant's sole cost if, in the City's judgment, the Consultant generates excessive addenda, either in terms of the nature of the revision or the actual number of changes due to the Consultant's errors or omissions. 9.4 The City may withhold or nullify the whole or part of any payment as detailed in Article II. ARTICLE X — CONSULTANT REMEDIES 10.1 If Consultant is delayed due to uncontrollable circumstances, such as strikes, riots, acts of God, national emergency, acts of the public enemy, governmental restrictions, laws or regulations or any other causes beyond Consultant's and City's reasonable control, an extension of the Project schedule in an amount equal to the time lost due to such delay shall be Consultant's sole and exclusive remedy. The revised schedule should be approved in writing with a documented reason for granting the extension. 10.2 If Consultant requests a remedy for a condition not specified above, Consultant must file a Claim as provided in this Agreement. ARTICLE XI — CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 11.1 Filing of Claims 11.1.1 Claims arising from the circumstances identified in this Agreement or other occurrences or events, shall be made by Written Notice delivered by the party making the Claim to the other party within twenty-one (21) calendar days after the start of the occurrence or event giving rise to the Claim and stating the general nature of the Claim. 11.1.2 Every Claim of Consultant, whether for additional compensation, additional time or other relief, shall be signed and sworn to by a person authorized to bind the Consultant by his/her signature, verifying the truth and accuracy of the Claim. 11.1.3 The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the Claim. 11.1.4 Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice and supporting documentation, City will meet to discuss the request, after which an offer of settlement or a notification of no settlement offer will be sent to Consultant. If Consultant is not satisfied with the proposal presented, Consultant will have thirty (30) calendar days in which to (i) submit additional supporting data requested by the City, (ii) modify the initial request for remedy or (iii) request Alternative Dispute Resolution. Page 7 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC 11.1.5 Pending final resolution of a claim, except as otherwise agreed in writing, Consultant shall proceed diligently with performance of the Agreement and City shall continue to make payments in accordance with this Agreement. 11.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution 11.2.1 All negotiations pursuant to this clause are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. 11.2.2 Before invoking mediation or any other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process set forth herein, the Parties agree that they shall first try to resolve any dispute arising out of or related to this Agreement through discussions directly between those senior management representatives within their respective organizations who have overall managerial responsibility for similar projects. This step shall be a condition precedent to the use of any other ADR process. If the parties' senior management representatives cannot resolve the dispute within thirty (30) calendar days after a Party delivers a written notice of such dispute, then the Parties shall proceed with the mediation ADR process contained herein. 11.2.3 Mediation 11.2.3.1 In the event that City or Consultant shall contend that the other has committed a material breach of this Agreement, the Party alleging such breach shall, as a condition precedent to filing any lawsuit, request mediation of the dispute. 11.2.3.2 Request for mediation shall be in writing, and shall request that the mediation commence no less than thirty (30) or more than ninety (90) calendar days following the date of the request, except upon agreement of both parties. 11.2.3.3 In the event City and Consultant are unable to agree to a date for the mediation or to the identity of the mediator or mediators within thirty (30) calendar days of the request for mediation, all conditions precedent in this Article shall be deemed to have occurred. 11.2.3.4 The parties shall share the mediator's fee. Venue for any mediation or lawsuit arising under this Agreement shall be Nueces County, Texas. Any agreement reached in mediation shall be enforceable as a settlement agreement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall waive any immunity or defense. No provision of this Agreement is a consent to suit. 11.3 In case of litigation between the parties, Consultant and City agree that neither party shall be responsible for payment of attorney's fees pursuant to any law or other provision for payment of attorneys' fees. Both Parties expressly waive any claim to attorney's fees should litigation result from any dispute in this Agreement. 11.4 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO WAIVE CITY'S GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUIT, WHICH IMMUNITY IS EXPRESSLY RETAINED TO THE EXTENT IT IS NOT CLEARLY AND UNAMBIGUOUSLY WAIVED BY STATE LAW. Page 8 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC ARTICLE XII — MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 12.1 Assignability. The Consultant will not assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties in this Agreement to any other person without the prior written consent of the City, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. If the Consultant is a partnership, then in the event of the termination of the partnership, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 12.2 Ownership of Documents. Consultant agrees that upon payment, City shall exclusively own any and all information in whatsoever form and character produced and/or maintained in accordance with, pursuant to or as a result of this Agreement, including contract documents (plans and specifications), drawings and submittal data. Consultant may make a copy for its files. Any reuse, without specific written verification or adaptation by Consultant, shall be a City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. 12.3 Standard of Care. Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers or architects practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 12.4 Licensing. Consultant shall be represented by personnel with appropriate licensure, registration and/or certification(s) at meetings of any official nature concerning the Project, including scope meetings, review meetings, pre-bid meetings and preconstruction meetings. 12.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including Task Orders, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. 12.6 Disclosure of Interest. (Exhibit E) Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. 12.7 Certificate of Interested Parties. (Exhibit F). Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement. Form 1295 requires disclosure of "interested parties" with respect to entities that enter contracts with cities that exceed $50,000. These interested parties include: (1) persons with a "controlling interest" in the entity, which includes: a. an ownership interest or participating interest in a business entity by virtue of units, percentage, shares, stock or otherwise that exceeds 10 percent; b. membership on the board of directors or other governing body of a business entity of which the board or other governing body is composed of not more than 10 members; or c. service as an officer of a business entity that has four or fewer officers, or service as one of the four officers most highly compensated by a business entity that has more than four officers; or (2) a person who actively participates in facilitating a contractor negotiating the terms of a contract with a governmental entity or state agency, including a broker, intermediary, adviser or attorney for the business entity. Page 9 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS\MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info_form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://vtiww.ethics.state.tx.usilegal/046.html. 12.8 Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at hate://www.cctexas.com/governryent/city-secretary/conflict-d sclosure/in ex, 12.9 Controlling Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 12.10 Severability. If, for any reason, any one or more Articles and/or paragraphs of this Agreement are held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining Articles and/or paragraphs of this Agreement but shall be confined in its effect to the specific Article, sentences, clauses or parts of this Agreement held invalid or unenforceable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any Article, sentence, clause or parts of this Agreement, in any one or more instance, shall not affect or prejudice in any way the validity of this Agreement in any other instance. 12.11 Conflict Resolution Between Documents. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant -prepared Exhibit A, Scope of Services or in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with the terms of Articles I — XII of this Agreement (Articles) and/or an approved Task Order, the Articles and/or the Task Order shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E. Date Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date for City Attorney ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC. g/7// 2—St en A. Gilbreath, P.E. Date Associate 500 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 500 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 (361) 882-2257 Office Project No. E12191 Accounting Unit: 3495-043 Account: 550950 Activity: E12191 013495EXP Account Category: 50950 Fund Name: Storm Water 2012B Rev Bonds Encumbrance No. Page 10 Rev. 4/7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\VELMAP\DRAINAGE\E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPS MSA LOCKWOOD ANDREWS NEWNAM\MSA\2017 0407 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC EXHIBIT A SAMPLE TASK ORDER This Task Order pertains to a Master Services Agreement for Professional Services by and between City of Corpus Christi, Texas (City) and "Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc." (Consultant) dated , 2017 (Agreement). Consultant shall perform services on the project described below as provided in this Task Order and in the Agreement. This Task Order shall not be binding until it has been properly signed by both parties. Upon execution, this Task Order shall supplement the Agreement as it pertains to the project described below. TASK ORDER NO.: PROJECT NAME: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES 3. COMPENSATION This Task Order is approved and Consultant may proceed. remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E. Date Director of Engineering Services RECOMMENDED Operating Department Date All other terms and conditions of the Agreement LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC Steven A. Gilbreath, P.E. Associate 500 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 500 Corpus Christi, TX 78410 (361) 882-2257 Office Date Master Services Agreement EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT PROPOSAL Master Services Agreement August 18, 2017 Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi PO BOX 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. A LEO A DALY COMPANY Re: Proposal for IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements (E12191) Master Services Agreement Dear Mr. Edmonds, The purpose of this proposal is to continue with the overall goal to develop a plan to address observed flooding in the La Voila Creek / Airport Ditch Tributaries and to identify and prioritize ditch improvements throughout the sub -basin which serves the La Colonias, Los Encinos, Molina, West Oso, Old Brownsville Road, Corpus Christi international Airport, CC State School, and Gabe Lozano Sub -Basins, approximately 29 square miles. To mitigate the flooding risks in La Voila Creek tributaries and file revision request to FEMA's preliminary FIRMs, this project provides for the following tasks: • Make use of FEMA model, with revised parameters, for the La Voila Creek tributaries, and if warranted, file a FIRMs revision request to FEMA through the CLOMR/LOMR process; • Prioritize the major ditch (channel) improvement projects within the La Voila Creek tributaries based on the hydraulic modeling results; • Prepare design documents to select construction contractor for major ditch improvements in an approach of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (I0/I0); • Prepare multiple delivery orders (DOS) — "work orders" to contractor LAN assumes that it is the City's intent to Bid this project using a 3 -year Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract and LAN will issue Delivery Orders (DO's) to the selected contractor during the Construction Phase for maintenance -related improvements to the Major Ditches in the project area (Reference Attachment A, Exhibit 1). Attachment A details the scope of services required for this proposal. We propose to work this project in a Master Service Agreement (MSA) for a total contract amount not -to -exceed $300,000.00. OO N. Sin a a #Xa' o I]N R Ste.. lac pwa cII it v Textm 76e431 + 361. : 257 w .1166.ii'i EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 16 Jeff Edmonds Major Ditch IDIQ Proposal August 18, 2017 Page 2 Please feel free to contact me at 361-792-7225 or by email at smharris@Ian-inc.com if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Scott Harris, PE Regional Manager Attachments: A — Scope of Services Cc: Sarah West, P.E., Project Manager EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 16 Attachment A Scope of Services IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements (E12191) Tasks 1-5 - Oso Creek (OCB) Basin LaVoila / Airport Ditch Analysis, Recommendations, and Design Situation: For several years, major flooding has occurred along LaVoila Creek near Saratoga Boulevard, including at the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant and within the Las Colonias Subdivision. Multiple studies have been conducted over the past 10 years that have made recommendations to either expand, clear and grub, re -shape, or even line the channel both upstream and downstream of Saratoga; no recommendations have been fully implemented to this date however there are current plans in design to improve the channel south of Saratoga Boulevard. LaVoila Creek is a natural drainage -way in Corpus Christi that drains 34.45 square miles of western Corpus Christi, into Oso Creek. The drainage way is only partially developed as many sections are still meandering and heavily vegetated. Several tributaries of La Voila Creek include: Margaret Kelly Ditch, Saratoga Downs Ditch, and the Airport Ditch (Reference Exhibit 1). These tributaries are affected by the backwater from the LaVolia Creek in flood stage. The Airport Ditch isa concrete-Iined major open -channel drainage ditch along the west side of the City that drains approximately 4200 acres or approximately 5000 cfs (peak 100 yr. storm). It extends from its' outfall into LaVo||a Creek near Gavilan Street (south) to Horne Road and Airport Road (north). At the Horne Road intersection two additional tributaries contribute to the system: the Horne Road Ditch (west) and the Armory Ditch (east). The La Volia / Airport Ditch system drains severalSub-Basins within the Oso Creek Basin (OCR). These include: La Colonias (}CB -200), Los Encinos (OC8'210), Molina /OCB'220i West Oso (OCB-230), OW Brownsville Road (OCB-240), Corpus Christi International Airport (OCB-241), CC State School (OCB-224), Gabe Lozano (OCB-221), and severasmaller sub -basins; totaling approximately 34.45 square miles. In October 2015, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) released the preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Fiood Insurance Study (FIS). As per the FEMA prelin,inary maps, several areas along and upstream of La Voila Creek and Airport Ditch are now included in either AE Floodway or AE/AO/AH/A99 zones which fall into 1% annual floodplain and mandatory flood insurance purchase is required. |nApril 2016, the City accomplished general assessment an the preliminary FIRMs proposed by FEMA for the Oso Creek basin. In that assesnment report, results from a revised Preliminary hydraulic model indicated an approximate average 3.1 feet water surface elevation reduction in the 1% (100 -year storm) event for Oso Creek basin compared to FEMA's preliminary hydraulic model. Accordingly, the City filed an EXHIBIT "B" appeal to FEMA for revising their preliminary FIRMS over Oso Creek Basin from Oso Bay at Ocean Drive to the confluence of Oso Creek and La Volla Creek. To mitigate the flooding risks in La Volla Creek tributaries and file revision request to FEMA's preliminary FIRMs, this project provides for the following tasks: • Task 1 - Make use of FEMA model, with revised parameters, for the La Voila Creek tributaries, and if warranted, file a FIRMs revision request to FEMA through the CLOMR/LOMR process; • Task 2 - Prioritize the major ditch (channel) improvement projects within the La Voila Creek tributaries based on the hydraulic modeling results; • Task 3 /4 - Prepare design documents to select construction contractor for major ditch improvements in an approach of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ); • Task 5 - Prepare multiple delivery orders (DOS) — "work orders" to contractor This contract is a Master Service Agreement (MSA) to provide the required professional engineering services for the IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements project. The MSA contract specifies basic scope, terms, and conditions that will govern future Task Orders. Future Task Orders will be issued with specific scope of work and associated fees. The total Task Orders will not exceed the MSA contract value. Future Task Orders will be administratively issued by the Director of Engineering Services or designee. Exhibits 1- Project Area EXHIBIT "B" Page 4 of 16 Phase 2~~Detailed Scope of Services The following scope outlines the procedures that Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam (LAN) will follow to provide the required professional services Project Area: Reference Exhibit 1 L BASIC SERVICES A. Task 1— Make use of FEMA model, with revised parameters, for the La Voila Creek Basin (approximately 34.45 square miles) 1. Consult with City of Corpus Christi to understand requirements for each Task and review available data. 2. Participate in one (1) Task Kick-off and (2) Progress Meetings with the City staff, prepare the meeting agenda and distribute minutes to attendees within five working days of the meeting. 3. Provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) measures to verify that all submittals of the project reflect the percent completion designated and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by City. 4. Prepare and submit Monthly Invoices and Status Reports to the Project Manager no later than the last Wednesday of each month with action items developed from monthly progress and review meetings. S. Advise CITY as to the necessity of providing or obtaining from others data or services, Additional Services (i.e. geotechnical or topographic survey), which are not part of LAN's Basic Services, and assist CITY in obtaining such data and services. 6. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities (i.e. TCEQ, FEMA, etc.) having jurisdiction over the CITY to approve the portions of the Project designed or specified by LAN with whom consultation is to be undertaken in connection with the Project. 7. Data Coflection and Field Visits a. Collect and review historical Engineering reports, surveys, and hydrologic & hydraulic models for the project area and its vicinity. LAN shall carefully evaluate each previous study's assumptions, background, data sources, and its applicability to the current task order. b. Make one (1) three-day field visit to the project area to field verify existing conditions. Photographs and field verification of existing conditions of the main creek channels, overbank areas, and structures will be completed during the field visit. Field visit will also be performed to verify the available data collected in the project areas. Q. Existing Condition Hydrologic Modeling — as part of this task, LAN will complete a hydrologic analysis of the project area by using HEC -HMS. Hydrographs corresponding to 1O%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% AEP storm events will be developed from HEC -HMS as boundary conditions for unsteady HEC -RAS model. Tasks rnvolved in this analysis include: a. Delineating Drainage Areas - Drainage areas will be delineated as necessary within the study areas based on the LIDAR data, as -built, survey, and existing plan sets. b. Hydrologic parameters - Hydrologic parameters for drainage areas (Curve Numbers, Clark Unit Hydrograph) are to be determined per the City Drainage Criteria Manual. EXHIBIT "B" This effort could involve using City standards, land -use data, soils data, and aerial imagery. c. Rainfall Storm Event —10%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% AEP will be computed by using rainfall depth values listed in the City's Drainage Criteria Manual or LEGS WRIR 984044. d. Muskingum, Muskingum-Cunge, or Modified Plus methods will be applied to HEC -HMS reach routing modules as recommended in the City Drainage Criteria Manual. 9. Existing Condition Hydraulic Modeling — as part of this task, LAN will complete hydraulic analyses of the open channel system in the project area. Tasks involved in this analysis include: a. 1D steady-state HEC -RAS models (10%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% AEP storm events) will be developed for the project basin. LAN will obtain the current effective FEMA hydraulic models, as well as the hydraulic models developed by the City's other consultants, and convert these models to one unsteady -state HEC -RAS hydraulic model. LAN will utilize the effective FEMA HEC -RAS cross sections, where possible. As shown in Exhibit 1, currently, La Voila Creek, Margaret Kelly Channel, Donigan Channel and Airport Ditch #1 were studied in details by FEMA. b. LAN will develop 1D steady-state HEC -RAS models for major ditches without an existing hydraulic model and incorporate these new models to the combined 1D steady-state HEC -RAS model. As shown in Exhibit 1, the major ditches which require new HEC -RAS models include Airport Ditch #2, Horne Road Ditch, Armory Ditch, Enterprise Channel, Saratoga Downs Channel, and Bates Channel. LiDAR furnished by the City will be utilized to acquire the hydraulic model geometry information. c. Hydraulic structures such as bridges and culverts will be built into the models appropriately by as -built record drawings from the City. When as -built drawings are not available, the engineer will notify the City for guidance. Any field survey efforts if deemed necessary by the City to acquire as -built or existing data will be authorized separately through a contract aniendment. d. Ma nnings' n values will be examined by Table 4-3 of the City Drainage Criteria Manual. Necessary adjustments will be made to Manning's n values to better represent existing field conditions and the recommendations of Table 4-3. e. Boundary Conditions and Inflows — Peak flows from the existing condition HEC -HMS model will be imported as boundary conditions into the combined 1D steady-state HEC -RAS model. Normal depth will be applied as the downstream boundary condition. f. The 1D steady-state HEC -RAS model will be validated by comparing to FEMA effective model results, historical storm event high water marks, and channel gage data if available. B. Task 2- Preliminary Phase Services - Prioritize the major ditch (channel) improvement projects within the La Volia Creek tributaries based on the hydraulic modeling results: 1. Evaluate various alternate solutions available to the City and after consultation with City, recommend those solutions which in the LAN's judgment best meet City of Corpus Christi's requirements forthe Project. a. Develop Improvement Alternatives Hydraulic HEC -RAS Models — LAN will perform hydraulic analyses on up to three (3) improvement alternatives comprised of major EXHIBIT "B" components of the open channel and hydraulic structures and ensure that those alternatives meet established criteria set forth in the City Drainage Criteria Manual. The improvement alternatives includes but not limited to: detention basins, channel widening, channel improvements, bridge enlargement and replacement, culvert enlargement and replacement. It worth noting that the Improvement Alternatives hydraulic models will be for planning, implementation and general impact analysis and are not intended to meet FEMA standards for flood risk mapping. These models will have varying level of detail for planning and implementation purposes. Any flood risk modifications will need to be made to the FEMA effective models should they ever need to be used for FEMA flood risk purposes, which is not part of this Scope of Service. i. Identified the preferred locations for various improvement alternatives. ii. Model development for the proposed alternatives will build upon the existing condition HEC -RAS model. iii. The proposed improvements modeling effort is an iterative process that involves evaluation of benefit and impact for different alternatives and subsequent modification and optimization. iv. The proposed improvements will be evaluated for cost effectiveness in reducing flood risk. v. Alternative improvements for the purposes of value engineering and reducing overall construction cost will be evaluated. vi. Detention basins will be modeled as reservoirs by revising existing condition HEC -HMS model, since normally detention basins will have great impact to peak flows. Other improvement alternatives will only be modeled in steady- state HEC -RAS model by assuming they are not going to change the watershed hydrologic condition substantially. b. Cost Estimates - Planning level cost estimates will be prepared for each of the three (3) alternatives. The Engineer will develop an Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) for the recommended alternatives. The cost estimates should include all major project items such as major ditch improvements, channel lining, earthwork, embankment, retention/detention basins, major utility relocations, and bridge or culvert repIacement with an overall 25% contingency. Z. Develop preliminary requirements for utility relocations and replacements or upgrades necessary for any proposed iniprovements. 3. Prepare engineering letter reports (ELR's) which will contain the statement of City's requirements for the Project and, as appropriate, will contain major ditch, channel, and/or hydraulic structure improvement schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria for drainage improvements with appropriate exhibits to indicate the considerations involved and those alternate solutions available to City, which LAN recommends. 4. Develop Sub -Basin Capital Improvement Plan / Project List — As an appendix to the ELR, LAN will develop a detailed |\stnforo|ects recommended for implementation in the sub -basin to improve the conditions of the existing major open ditch systems, improve flooding within the sub -basin, and irnprove water quality within the sub -basin and at its' outfall into Oso Creek. The project list will be comprehensive, include lifecycle costs, but will NOT be intended for full implementation during the three-year IDIQ contract. EXHIBIT "B" C. Task 3 - Design Phase Services 1. Prepare a "Project Manual" in City standard format for typical maintenance -related storm water open ditch improvements that the selected contractor can execute using delivery orders issued during the construction phase of this project. The scope and contents of the project manual will include: PLANS5 1 Cover Sheet and Plan Index 2 Legend Detail Syrrbols, Testint Schedulemm 3 General Notes 4 Stormx ater Pollution Prevention Standard Details 5 Bank Stabilization/ an nt 1 Grading (details 6 Earthwork ! Excavation ! Storage Details 7 and 8 Erosion Control Measures - Standard Details (2 Sheets) 9 Re-establishment of Riparian Areas ! Overbank - Standard tad 10 t 1 Velocii Control Structures ! Energy Dssapators Standard Details 11 Traffic Control (Sheet 1 of 5) 12 Traffic Control (Sheet 2 of 5) 13 Traffic Control (Sheet 3 of 5) 14 Traffic Control (Sheet 4 of 5)- 15 Traffic Control (Sheet 5 of 5) 16 - 27 Tx DOT Barricade & Construction Details (12 Sheets) 28 44 C.rt)± of Corpus Christi Standard Details (17 Sheets) ^, !ECT MA ..„L DN 00 Procurement and Contracting Requirements ON 01 General Requirements Part S Standard Specifications Pan T Technical Specifications The following typical submittals apply to all deliverables: a. 60% Design Phase Submittal i. Complete internal quality control check of plans and calculations per the Quality Control Plan developed in Task 1. ii. Furnish one (1) set of the interim plans and typical details (60% submittal electronic and hard copies using City Standards as applicable) to the City staff for review and approval purposes with an opinion of probable construction costs. Identify distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected franchise utilities. EXHIBIT "B” Page 8 of 16 iii. Required with the interim plans is a "Plan Executive Summary, project checklist & drawing checklistwhich wiJI identify and summarize the project by distinguishing key elements and opinion of probable project costs iv. Attend 6096 submittal meeting with City Staif to assist staif in review of 60% submittal. b. 90% Design Phase Submittal i Assimilate all 60% review comments upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services. U. Complete internal quality control check of plans, specifications, and calculations per the Quality Control PIan developed in Task 1. iii. Provide one (1) set of the pre -final plans, project manual, and bid documents (g096submittal - electronic and hard copy using City Standards as applicable) to the City staif for review and approval purposes with a revised opinion of probable construction costs. Plan executive summary, project checklist and plan checklist. iv. Participate in project 90% submittal review meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting minutes to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assin,ilate all review comment5, and incorporate any requirements into the plans and specifications, and advise City of responding and non- responding participants as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. c. Final Submittals L Assimilate all 9096 review comments upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services. ii. Complete internal quality control check of plans, specifications, and calculations per the Quality Control PIan developed in Task 1. iii. Provide one (1) set of the final (100%) plans, project manual, (unsealed and unstamped - electronic and half full-size hard copy using City Standards as applicable) for City's final review. d. Issued for Bid Documents |. Assimilate all final review comments upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services U. Provide one (1) set of the final signed and sealed ISSUED FOR BID plans and contract documents (electronic and half full-size hard copy using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Said bid documents henceforth become the shared intellectual property of the City of Corpus Christi and the Consultant. D. Task 4 - Bid / Phase Services 1. Participate in the pre-bid conference and provide a meeting agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. 2. Assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective bidders, and review of bids by solicited interests. EXHIBIT "B" 3. Review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid documents and prepare, in the City's format, for approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors mfapproved changes prior tobidding. 4. Attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and make recommendation concerning award of the contract. S. Participate in pre -construction meeting conference and provide a recommended agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. 6. Review, Contractor submittals and operating and maintenance manuals for conformance to contract documents. E. Task 5 - Construction Phase Services LAN assumes that it is the City's intent to Bid this project using a 3 -year Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. LAN will issue Delivery Orders (DO's) to the selected contractor during the Construction Phase for maintenance -related improvements to the Major Ditches in this project area (Reference Exhibit 1). 1. Issue Delivery Orders as foliows: a. Delivery Order #1 — Year 1 — assume start of construction in early 2018 with a 6 -month construction duration. b. Delivery Order #2 — Year 2 — assume start of construction in late 2018 with a 6 -month construction duration. c. Delivery Order #3 — Year 3 — assume start of construction in early with a 6 -month construction duration. 2. Each delivery order will include the following construction engineering / administration tasks: a. Site Plan /Layout b. Site Specific General Notes / Specifications c. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) d. Construction Sequencing Plan e. Review and interpret field and laboratory tests. f. Make regular vi5its to the site of the Project to confer with the City project inspector and contractor to observe the general progress and quality of work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the contract documents. LAN assumes one (1) 4 -hour site visit per week for a six (6) month project duration. Q. Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the contractor and authorize required changes, which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City underthe contract. h. Prepare change orders as authorized by the City; provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for the contractor and authorize minor changes which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. I Attend final inspection with City staff; provide punch list items to the City's Construction Engineers forcontractorcompletion of the project. EXHIBIT "B" j. Review Contractor -provided construction 'red-Iine' drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD c14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. AH drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each Iayer being provided in a separate file, Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format intabular form. AII electronic data w1II be compatible with the City GIS system. F. Dmcurmemtm/ Services to be provided by the City The City shall provide LAN available studies, surveys, and reports concurrently when issuing the Notice to Proceed for a work authorization from this master service agreement. The documents to be provided to LAN include but not limited to: 1. Project budget specifying the funds available for the construction of stormwater improvements related to this contract 2. Existing Reports/plans for stormwater improvements 3. Existing L|DAM, conventional topographic survey data in the project area, City control benchmarks and coordinates 4. Existing GIS data including roadways, waterway and water body alignments and boundaries S. As -built record drawings for utilities, channels, bridges, and culverts in the project areas. 6. Land use data, soil group data 7. Existing HEC -HMS, HEC -RAS, and other hydrologic and hydraulic models developed by FEMA and the City's consultants. EXHIBIT "B" II. ADDITIONAL SERVICES This section defines the scope of additional services that may be needed for construction of these projects. The fees associated with these services are NOT included in this proposal. LAN will not begin work on any service under this section without specific written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The A/E shall, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, perform the foliowing: A. Permitting - Furnish the City all engineering data and documentation necessary for all required permits. LAN will prepare this documentation for all required signatures. LAN will prepare and submit identified permits as applicable to the appropriate local, state, and federal authorities. B. LOM — LAN will prepare LOMR/CLOMR package for proposed design alternatives, if deemed necessary. C. Right -of -Way (ROW) Acquisition Survey and Parcel Descriptions - all work must comply with Category 1-A, Condition I specifications of the Texas Society of Professional Surveyors' Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. All work must be tied to and in conformance with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network. All work must comply with all TXDOT requirements as applicable. LAN will coordinate with a sub -consultant to complete the following: 1. Perform surveys to determine apparent right-of-way widths. 2. ReseanchA|ats,ROVVmap4deed,easements,andsunveyfor0anceoornem,rnouments, and iron pins within the existing ROW and analyze to establish existing apparent ROW. A/E must obtain Preliminary Title Reports from a local title company and provide copies of the title reports to the City. Preliminary Title Report shall identify title ownership and any title encurnbrances to all right-of-way to be acquired. 3. Provide a preliminary base map containing apparent ROW. This preliminary base map must show lot or property lines, land ownership and addresses as per appraisal district records. 4. Prepare Metes and Bounds instrument with supporting exhibits as required and agreed upon for ROW parcels, utility easements, and temporary construction easements. S. Determine property corners and prepare right of way strip parcel map depicting all parcels proposed for acquisition. Metes and bounds descriptions must indicate parent tract areas based on the most accurate information available. Strip map will show entire parent tracts at "not to scale" and for information only. All existing easements within the parcels to be acquired and those within adjacent parcels must be shown. 6. Prepare individual signed and sealed parcel maps and legal descriptions for the required right of way acquisition for parcels and easements. A strip map showing all parcels required will be submitted along with parcel descriptions. Additional fees may be required in resolving boundary conflicts between Owners. D. Topographic Survey — Based on the value of the data gathered during the Preliminary Phase of this project (Task 1); there may be a need for additional site specific topographic survey to be accomplished prior to construction of any Delivery Order. In general, all work must be tied to and EXHIBIT "B" conform with the City's Giobal Positioning System (GPS) coritrol network and comply with Category 6, Condition I specifications of the Texas Society of Professional SurveyorsM Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. Include reference to a minimum of two (2) found boundary monuments from the project area. LAN will coordinate with a sub -consultant to complete the following: 1. Survey Control a. Establish Horizontal and Vertical Control; establish both primary and secondary horizontal/vertical control. b. Set project control points for Horizontal and Vertical Control outside the limits of project construction disturbance. c. Horizontal control will be based on NAD 83 State plane coordinates (South Zone), and the data will have no adjustment factor applied — i.e. —the coordinate data will remain in grid. d. Vertical control wili be based on NAVD 88. e. All control work will be established using conventional (non -GPS) methods. Perform topographic surveys to gather existing condition information. 2. Utilities - Within the limits of the major ditch improvements projects, obtain x, y, and z coordinates of all accessible existing utilities included but not limited to: a. City owned sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and gas lines b. Third -party utilities, i.e. electrical, telecommunications, oil & gas pipeUnes and wells, all visible utilities signs within the project limits. 3. Locate proposed soil/pavement core holes as drilled by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant. 4. Locate improvements within the apparent project limits. S. Locate and identify trees, at least five inches in diameter within the project limits. 6. Basemap - Generate electronic planimetric base map for use in project design. E. Environmental Assessments / Archeological Studies 1. LAN shall identify and develop a scope of work for any testing, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction. 2. Phase I Assessment — if necessary LAN will coordinate with a Subconsultant for the following services: a. Performance of an on-site visit to view present conditions (chemical spill residue, die - back of vegetation, etc.); hazardous substances or petroleum products usage (presence of above ground or underground storage tanks, storage of acids, etc.); and evaluate any likely environmentally hazardous site history. b. Evaluation of risks of neighboring properties upon the subject property c. Review of Federal, State, Local and Tribal Records out to distances specified by the ASTM 1528 and AAI Standards (ranging from 1/8 to 1 mile depending on the database) d. Interview of persons knowledgeable regarding the property history (past owners, present owner, key site manager, present tenants, neighbors). 3. Archeological Studies - if necessary LAN will Subconsultant the following services: a. Archeological site surveys and testing b. Assessment of significance and effects on project EXHIBIT "B" c. Technical memorandum, reports F. Public Involvement. Participate in public rneetings. For each public meeting, LAN will: 1. Provide follow-up and response to citizen comments Z. Revise contract drawings to address citizen comments, as directed by the City 3. Prepare notices, handouts and exhibits for public information meetings G. Subsurface UtilityAnvestigation—ifnecessary for the design of storm water related improvements in this contract, LAN will coordinate with a Subconsultant for the following services: 1. Inform local franchises whose utilities fall within the footprint of construction -related excavation ofthe potentialfor encountering their utility lines during construction. 2. Provide subsurface utility engineering in accordance with ASCE Standard "ASCE C-|, 38'02, Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data" including, but not Iimited to, hydro -excavation, The proposed subsurface utility investigation will be as foliows: a. Excavation — The survey scope includes working with a subsurface utility excavator to perform Quality Level A investigation of underground utilities in specified areas through the project limit. (Quality Level A involves the use of nondestructive di: : ing equipment at critical points to determine the horizontal and vertical position of underground utilities, as well as the type, size, condition, material, and other characteristics.) Utilities Iocated at this quality level will be physically Iocated and tied to the topographic survey control. The utility wifl be identified and an elevation will be obtained to the top of the utility, b. Utility Location — The survey scope includes locating certain utilities to Quality Level B (Quality Level B involves surveying visible above ground utility facilities, such as manholes, valve boxes, posts, etc., and correlating this information with existing utility records.) These utilities will be located by obtaining a One -Call Notice and measuring the marked Iocations. c. Storm Water —Storm water facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed locations of accessible storm water manholes and drainage inlet . d. Wastewater — Wastewater facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed Iocations of accessible wastewater manholes. Wastewater lines that are not to be replaced as part of this project and that fall within the footprint of construction -related excavation shall be located at Quality Level A. e. Water — Water facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. f. Gas — Gas facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C by the A/E. The City of Corpus Christi Gas Department will provide Quality Level A. The A/E will coordinate this activity. H. Geotechnical Engineering Services - LAN will coordinate with a sub -consultant to complete a subsurface investigation of the project area. EXHIBIT "B" 1. LAN will communicate to the City and Subconsultant the total number of borings required and termination depths of those borings in each work authorization from this Master Service Agreements. 2. Consultants will sample, identify and measure the pavement constituents at each boring location. The scope of work is provided below: a. Coordination with Texas One Call to identify underground utilities in the proximity of the boring Iocations. The borings will be relocated if necessary. b. Traffic control and traffic control devices as required by the City of Corpus Christi during field investigation. c. Soil samples will be obtained at predetermined depths, unless subsurface conditions warrant additional sampling. d. Groundwater readings will be obtained during drilling and immediately upon completion of the drilling operations. e. After obtaining the delayed groundwater readings, the open boreholes will be backfilled with excess solis obtained during the drilling operations; the base material wiU be replaced in the boreholes and patched with cold rnix. f. Scope of Laboratory Testing Program i. Supplementary Visual Classification (ASTM D2487) ii. Water Content Tests (ASTM D 2216) iii. Atterberg Limits Test(ASTM D 4318) iv. Unconfined Compressive Strength Tests (ASTM D 2166) v. Percent Material FinerThan The #200 Sieve Tests (ASTM ID 1140) vi. All phases of the laboratory testing program will be performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM Specifications. AII field and laboratory test results will be included on the boring Iogs or provided in the report, Geotechnical Engineering Report. In addition to the field and laboratory testing, a geotechnical engineering report will be prepared that includes a description of the field exploration and laboratory tests, boring logs, a discussion of the engineering properties of the subsurface materials encountered, trench excavation design parameters, OSHA soil type classification, utility trench recommendations and pavement recommendations for the proposed project. 8. EXHIBIT "B" 4mur:ww 1,141“ q1.1.4(!!!.///llliir / urrrrrrrrm[^:: mmxnr anrslo'a'. {li�d!ll!lllfi;! POM'MiloIIIIuMA:WNmuu&NnowlE1III iV,:::/llllll llili� lll� n lud!: EXHIBIT "B" Page 16 of 16 EXHIBIT C PAYMENT REQUEST FORM Master Services Agreement COMPLETE PROJECT NAME X in X g M X d z z ; a) V ,o o > a_ Invoice Date 01/01/2017 i i a) a a) a) Q O U a a co a E cri a) co cG m O H V O c d d i O 7 > U C N d z 0 O Z 0 E 0 i c O U Basic Services: 0 O 00 0 O O so 0 O O 0 O O 30.3%I 25.0%I 0 O O 0 O O TBD TBD TBD 10.5% 30.3% 10.5% 23.1 c 0 EA 1 $1,500.00 0 0 L() N EA 0 0 O LO C+') EA 0 0 Lt) N lf) EA O O EA 1 $1,500.00 c o N ,— EA c r- N CD ,— EA TBD TBD TBD 1 $4,247.00 O O EA c o L() ti LO EA 1 $4,247.00 c ti 0) () CA EA O O O O O EA $1,500.001 O O O EA O O O EA O O O O Ci) N EA O O O O Ci) EA O O O EA O O O EA TBD TBD TBD O O O O Ci) EA O O O O N EA O O O O LO EA O O O O O C,,) EA O O 00 EA O O O O O EA O O EA $1,500.00 O O EA O O EA O O EA TBD TBD TBD O O EA $1,500.00 O O EA $1,500.00 O O 0 EA O O 0 O OO EA O O 0 EA O O 0 EA O O 0 O EA O O 0 O O O 0 EA O O 0 EA TBD TBD TBD O O 0 O L O O 0 O O EA O O 0 O LO 1 $1,500.00 O 0 0 E/r)- E!} O 0 o M E!} O 0 to ti"M O 0 o E!} $8,250.001 O o Q N E!} $1,120.001 O ti m E!} TBD TBD TBD $4,747.00 $8,250.00 $4,747.00 O ti rn SN- E!} 0 EA 0 0 EA 0 O� N 0 0 O O EA $1,250.00 0 EA 0 EA N Cfl EA TBD TBD TBD 0 N Cfl EA $1,250.00 N Cfl EA $2,877.00 O O 0 EA O O 0 O O EA O O 0 EA O O 0 EA O O 0 O O EA O O 0 EA O O 0 N EA O O o EA TBD TBD TBD O O O N EA O O o O O EA O O 0 N EA O O 0 N CN EA O O 0 O 0 EA O O 0 O 0 N EA O O 0 O LO O O 0 O LO N EA O O 0 O 0 (.fl EA O O 0 O O N EA O O 0 EA O O 0 EA TBD TBD TBD O O 0 O O N EA O O 0 O O (.6 EA O O 0 O O N EA O O 0 O O CO EA Preliminary Phase Design Phase a) co 0 Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Platting Survey 0 & M Manuals 0 0 Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees: Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Master Services Agreement EXHIBIT D Insurance Requirements Pre -Design, Design and General Consulting Contracts 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. A waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 1.5 In the event of a change in insurance coverage, Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided EXHIBIT "D" Page 1 of 2 below within 10 business days of said change. Consultant shall pay any costs resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 If the policy is cancelled, other than for nonpayment of premium, notice of such cancellation will be provided at least 30 days in advance of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder; 1.6.2 If the policy is cancelled for nonpayment of premium, notice of such cancellation will be provided within 10 days of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall notify City of such lapse in coverage and provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that ConsuItant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. EXHIBIT "D" Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 7/112018 DATE (M •; 4'13/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, END OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT B EEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA E OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(Ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endo , d. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endo ment(s). PRODUCER Lockton Companies W. 47th Street, Suite 900 Kansas City MO 64112-1906 (816) 960-9000 INSURED LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC. 1393396 A . DON SC •TZ 2925 BRIARPARK DRIVE HOUSTON TX 77042 COVERAGES LEOADOI CONTACT NAME: PHONE E MAIL ESS: INSURER(5) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A Lloyd's of London INSURER B INSURER C INSURER D s INSURER E INSURER F CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 14652625 FAX NC REVISION NUMBER: HNC N 38253 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSU ;CE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER 0* UMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE Y BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR OF INSU"r CE ADLI DL SUER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR I [AD .rax. POLICY NUMBER . . (MMIDDIYYYYI . (UMIDOIYYYYI A COMMERCIAL GEN CLAIMS -MADE tAL LABILITY OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER. POLICY LOC OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED AUTOS ONLY HIRED AUTOS ONLY UMBRELLA LAB EXCESS DED - SCHEDULED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY RETENTION 5 OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOY ' LIABILITY Y1 N ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUT1VE 1-7 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) It yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below PROFFESIONAL LIABILITY NlA N NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE N 1 LDUSA1704566 T1/2017 7(1/2018 LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES lEa occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT JEa accalen1 BODILY INJURY (Per person) sX 5 $ 5 5 5 X BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE ,-tiler ecoJenU EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE PER STATUTE E.L EACH ACCIDENT ERH E.L. DISEASE • EA EMPLOYEE E.L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 5 5 s XXXXX SXXXXXXX 5 XXXXXXX s XXXXXXX - S X XX SXXXXXXX S1,000,i11 EACH CLAIM AND 52, 11,000 IN THE ANNUAL AGGREGATE DESCRIPTION OF OP TIONS 1 LOCA1IONS 1 VEHICLES (ACORD 101. Additional Remarks Schedule. may be attached if more apace is required) RE E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPROVEMENTS. A THIRTY (30) DAY NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION 14652625 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI A : RISK MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 9277 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78469-9277 ACORD 25 (2015103) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. � e „ ®1988'1'015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ACS CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 1/1/2018 DATE (MMIDD/YYYY) 4:27,12017 THIS CERTIFICATE 15 ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION 15 WAIVED, subject to the terns and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Lockion Companies 444 W. 47th Street, Suite 900 Kansas City MO 64112-1906 (816) 960-9000 INSURED LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC. 1392953 ATTN: MR. DON SCHUETZ 2925 BRIARPARK DRIVE HOUSTON TX 77042 COVERAGES LEOAD01 CONTACT NAME: PHONE INC. No. EAU: EMAIL ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE FAX No): INSURER A :American Casualty Company of Reading, PA INSURER B : Vaticy_F(u'gdn$ufance Company NAtC / 20427 20508 INSURER c : TravelersProperty Casualty Co ol'America 25674 INSURER D : National Fire Insurance Co of Hartford INSURER E , Transportation Insurance Company INSURER F : CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 14652623 REVISION NUMBER: 20478 20494 xxxxxxx THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 'NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE AODL'SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MMIDDIYYYYI i$MIDDIYYYY) D X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR A MT PER E N POLICY I AGGREGATE /IIAPPLIESI LOC OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILnY X ANY AUTO OWNED AUTOS ONLY X HIRED _ AUTOS ONLY SCHEDULED AUTOS NON -OWNED _ AUTOS ONLY Y N Y N 1015651942 1015651956 11112017 1/2017 1,°1/2018 11/2018 LIMRS EACH OCCURRENCE 'DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISE! (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) PERSONAL b ADV INJURY GENERAL AC(REGATE PRODUCTS COMP/OP AGC COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) s 1,000,000 $ 300,000 $ 10,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ xxfix $xxxxxxx $xxxxxxx sxXxxxxx C B a x UMBRELLA LIAR EXCESS LJAB DED X x OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE RETENTION S 10,000 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y i N ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERd:XECUTIVE OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? N (Mandatory In NH) II yes describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below N N NIA Y ZUP-14N 19818-17 1015651973 (AOS) 1063334422 (CA) l 1/2017 1'1,2018 1.'11017 1.1 '2017 1!1,2018 1/1"2018 EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE X I STATUTE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT OTH- ER E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ xxxxxxx s 1,000,000 5 1,000,000 s 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS f LOCATIONS i VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: E12191 IDIQ MAJOR DITCH IMPROVEMENTS, THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES, VOLUNTEERS, AND ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED ON THE GENERAL AND AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY POLICIES. THE TERM "OTHER INSURANCE" CLAUSE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI WHERE THE CITY IS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED, A WAIVER OF SUBROGATION 15 ISSUED IN FAVOR OF THE CITY ON THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY POLICIES A THIRTY (30) DAY NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY CERTIFICATE HOLDER 14652623 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ATTN: RISK MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 9277 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78469-9277 ACORD 25 (2016/03) CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV CO 1988 015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD EXHIBIT E DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Master Services Agreement faimararow CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of s City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as ended,. requires all pe • as or firms seeking Chnsu to do business with the City to provide the following mformation. Every question must be an cred. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reve side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. $ CO P. 0. BOX: N Lockwood, And s & N nam, Inc. ET ADDRESS: 500 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 500 CITY: Corpus Ch 6 ZIP: 78401 FIRM IS: I. Corporation 4. Association 2. 12= ership 5. Other 3, Sole Owner DISCLOS ' QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, ple . use the reve side of this page or attach sep, te sheet. 1. State the n• es of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership inte " constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "fi ." Ne lob Title and City Department (if known) nave* . 65 V.54 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 11111WWW,,15,1,1 ILXLX, 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership inte " constituting 3% or more of the o ership in the above named "fi ." N Committee Board, Commission or 4. State the n . es of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership inte constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." N e Consultant ........“..............,........numunnunnunnunnunnunurwen.mnannmweninromummimmunymmwamminummir.o, 11' iLING REQ MENTS if a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)j CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Steven A. Gilbreath, P.E. Title: (Type or Prioq Signature of Certifying Person: Associate DEFINITIONS Date: a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of tion are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant" Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT F CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Master Services Agreement Exhibit E CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Complete Nos. 1 -4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 If there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity tiling form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. Houston, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract lor which the form Is being filed. City of Corpus Christi FORM 1295 1 011 OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-73614 Date Filed: 06/20/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E12191 IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements 4 Daly, Leo Daly, Grega Petersen, Dennis Cohen, Amie Vajdani, Sima Name of Interested Party 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT .".4141/4 COURTNEY CASTELLANOS .. f_ANeNolary Public, State of Terra : • I ."Comm. Expires 0248-2020 Notary ID 130564.62 AFFIX NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE Swo 20, to and subscribed before me, by the said , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of off City, State, Country (place of business) Washington, DC United States Washington, DC United States Houston, TX United States Austin, TX United States Los Angeles, CA United States Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary X X X X X 1 swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct ure at authorized agent of contracting business entity , this the 54 - day of Signature of Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission name of officer a oathTele of o icer actmini www.ethics.state.bLus ening oath Version V1.0.1021 EXHIBIT G EXCERPT FROM GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Master Services Agreement Exhibit E Excerpt from FORM 0072 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services Table of Contents Page Article 1 - Definitions and Terminology ......... -^^-'.^..^.'.^.'..^.'.^.'.^^.^^^^^^^.^^^^^.-..^^^^^.^..^._..................... 2 Article 2- Preliminary Matters .............................. ............................... ..... ............................................ 8 Article 3 - Contract Documents: Intent, Requirements, Reuse ...................................... -..---..---8 Article 4 - Commencement and Progress of the Work .......... .......................... ---------.---.--...B ArticleS-AvailabUity of Lands; Subsurface and Physical Conditions; Hazardous Environmental Conditions.......... ......................................... ..................................................... ............................................. 9 Article 6 - Bonds and insurance _-'-'_._'''---.—.--.—.-._..'-..'-._---_'_'-_-__^l1 Article 7- Contractor's Responsibilities. -_.--..--.''.''.—.-.''..'-'----_-_._-__._.~21 Article 8 - Other Work atthe Site 11 Article 9 - Owner's and <JPT'sResponsibilities '..--._.—.''.-._.'-...'--_'----_-_-_--'.-11 ArtideIO-OAA'sand Designees Status During Construction............................ ..................................... ArtideIl-Arnend|ngtheContractDocunmmnts Changes in the Work .......................... .^.-.^.'..^I4 Article1Z - Claims ......................... ....................................................... ............................... -~-...'.~'I4 Article 13 - Cost of the WorkAllowances; Unit Price Work ............. ............................. -....-.~-I4 Article 14 - Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal, orAcceptance nfDefective Work .^--.^.-14 Article 15 - Payments to Contractor; Set -Offs; n; Correction Period 14 Article 16 - Suspension ofWork and Termination -.---.--.---_.--.-----_-..^..........,14 Article 17 - Final Resolution ofDisputes ---..---.---.-.----------_-..........,l4 Article l8 - Miscellaneous -_..'---._._.''._._-.—'_---_--__~..~...~.......~.._~_-l4 Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 1 EXHIBIT "G" ARTICLE 1—DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 1.01 Defined Terms A. A term with initiaI capital Ietters, including the term's singular and plural formshas the meaning indicated in this paragraph wherever used in the BidcIing Requirementsor Contract Documents. In addition to the terms specifically defined, terms with initial caprtal letters in the Contract Documents may include references to identified articles and paragraphs and the tities of other documents or forms. I. Addenda - Documents issued prior to the receipt of Bids which clarify or modify the Bidding Requirements ar the proposed Contract Documents. 2. Agreement - The document executed between Owner and Contractor covering the Work. 3. Alternative Dispute Resolution - The process by which a disputed Claim may be settled as an alternative to lif Owner and Contractor cannot reach an agreement between themselves. 4. Application for Payment - The forms used by Contractor to request payments from Owner and the supporting documentation required by the Contract Documents. 5. Award Date — The date the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi (City) authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the Contract on behalf of the City. 6. Bid - The documents submitted by a Bidder to establish the proposed Contract Price and Contract Times and provide other information and certifications as required by the Bidding Requirements. 7. Bidding Documents - The Bidding Requirements, the proposed Contract Documents, and Addenda. 8. Bidder-Anlndividualorentitythat submits a Bid to Owner. B. Bidding Requirements - The Invitation for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Security, Bid Form and attachments, and required cart|fioat|ons. 10. Bid Security - The financial security in the form of a bid bond provided by Bidder at the time the Bid is submitted and held by Owner until the Agreement is executed and the evidence of insurance and Bonds required by the Contract Documents are provided. A cashier's check, certified check, money order or bank draft from any State or National Bank will also be acceptable. 11. Bonds - Performance Bond, Payment Bond, Maintenance Bond, and other Surety instruments executed by Surety. When in singular form, refers to individual instrument. 12. Change Order - A document issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract and signed by Owner and Contractor which modifies the Work, Contract Price, Contract Times, or terms and conditions of the Contract. Excerpt from Form DD72OOGeneral Conditions -2Page 2 of 14 EXHIBIT "G" 13. ChangePmposa|-Adocummntsubmittedby Contractor in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents: a. Requesting an adjustment in Contract Price or Contract Times; b. Contesting an initial decision concerning the requirements of the Contract Documents ar the acceptability af Work under the Contract Documents; c. Challenging a set-off against payment due; or d. Seeking a Modification with respect to the terms of the Contract. 14. City Engineer - The Corpus Christi City Engineer and/or his designated representative as identified at the preconstruction conference or in the Notice to Proceed. 15. Claim - A demand or assertion by Owner or Contractor submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. A demand for money or services by an entity other than the Owner or Contractor is not a Claim. 16. Constituent of Concern - Asbestos, petroleum, radioactive materials, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hazardous wastes, and substances, products, wastes, or other materials that are or become listed, regulated, or addressed pursuant to: a. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§96DIetseq. ("CERCLA"); b. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. §§5501etseq.; c. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§89O1etseq. ("RCRA"); d. The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§2601etseq.; e. The Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. §§1251etseq^; f. The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401etseq.;or g. Any other Laws or Regulations regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards af conduct concerning hazardous, toxic, or dangerous waste, substance, or material. 17. Contract - The entire integrated set of documents concerning the Work and describing the relationship between the Owner and Contractor. 18. Contract Amendment - A document issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract and signed by Owner and Contractor which: a. Authorizes new phases of the Work and establishes the Contract Price, Contract Times, or terms and conditions of the Contract for the new phase of Work; or b. Modifies the terms and conditions of the Contract, but does not make changes in the Work. 19. Contract Documents - Those items desinated as Contract Documents in the Agreement. 20. Contract Price - The monetary amount stated in the Agreement and as adjusted by Modifications, and increases or decreases in unit price quantities, if any, that Owner has agreed to pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. EXHIBIT "G" Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 3 21. Contract Times - The number of days or the dates by which Contractor must: a. Achieve sMilestones; b. Achieve Substantial Competion; and c. Complete the Work. 22. Contractor - The individual or entity with which Owner has contracted for performance ofthe Work. 23. Contractor's Team - Contractor and Subcontractors, Suppiiers, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly empioyed or retained by them to perform part ofthe Work or anyone for whose acts they may be Iiable. 24. Cost of the Work - The sum of costs incurred for the proper performance of the Work as allowed by Article 13. 25. Defective - When applied to Work, refers to Work that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it: a. Does not conform to the Contract Documents b. Does not meet the requirements of applicable inms,referencestandards, tests, or approvats referred to in the Contract Documents; or c. Has been damaged or stolen prior to OAR's recommendation of final payment unless responsibility for the protection of the Work has been assumed by Owner at Substantial Completion in accordance with Paragraphs 15.08 or 15.04. 26. Designer - The individuals or entity named as Designer in the Agreement and the subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by Designer to provide design or ather technicai services to the Owner. Designer has responsibility for engineering or architectural design and technical issues related to the Contract Documents. Designers are Licensed Professional Engineers or Registered Architects qualified to practice their profession in the State of Texas. 27. Drawings - The part of the Contract that graphically shows the scope, extent and character of the Work. Shop Drawings and other Contractor documents are not Drawings. 28. Effective Date of the Contract - The date indicated in the Agreement on which the City Manager or designee has signed the Contract. 29. Field Order - A document issued by OAR or Designer requiring changes in the Work that do not change the Contract Price or the Contract Times. 30. Hazardous Environmental Condition - The presence of Constituents of Concern at the Site in quantities or circumstances that may present a danger to persons or property exposed to Constituents of Concern. The presence of Constituents of Concern at the Site necessary for the execution of the Work or to be incorporated in the Work is not a Hazardous Environmental Condition provided these Constituents of Concern are controlled and contained pursuant to industry practices, Laws and Regulations, and the requirements of the Contract. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions 4 EXHIBIT "G" 31. Indemnified Costs - All costs, Iosses, damages, and legal or other dispute resolution costs resulting from claims or demands against Owner's Indemnitees. These costs include fees for engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals. 32. Laws and Regulations; Laws or Regulations - Applicable laws, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, and orders of governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having jurisdiction over the P'ect, 33. Liens - Chargessecurity interestsor encumbrances upon Contract related fundsreal property, or personal property. 34. Milestone - A principal event in the performance of the Work that Contractor is required by Contract to complete by a specified date or within a specified period of time. 35. Modification - Change made to the Contract Documents by one of the following methods: a. Contract Amendment; b. Change Order; c. Field Order; or d. Work Change Directive. 36. Notice of Award - The notice of Owner's intent to enter into a contract with the Selected Bidder. 37. Notice to Proceed - A notice to Contractor of the Contract Times and the date Work is to begin. 38. Owner - The City of Corpus Christi (City), a Texas home -rule municipal corporation and political subdivision organized under the laws of the State of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized City Manager and his designee, the City Engineer (the Director of Engineering Services), and the City's officers, employees, agents, or napresentatives,author1zwdtoadnnlnlsterdeslQnandcon$tnuct|onofthePr Project. 39. Owner's Authorized Representative or OAR - The individual or entity named as OAR in the Agreement and the consultants, subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to provide construction management services to the Owner. The OAR may be an employee ofthe Owner. 40. Owner's indemnitees - Each member of the OPT and their officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors. 41. Owner's Prolect Team or OPT - The Owner, Owner's Authorized Representative, Resident P'ectRepresentative,DesiRner,andtheconsu|tan1s,subconsu|tants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to provide services to the Owner. 42. Partia|OccupancyorUse-UsebvOwnerofasubstantially completed part of the Work for the purpose for which it is intended (or a related purpose) prior to Substantial Completion of all the Work. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions 5Page 5 of 14 EXHIBIT "G" 43. Progress Schedule - A schedule prepared and maintained by Contractor, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising the Contractor's plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Times. 44. Project - The total undertaking to be accomplished for Owner under the Contract Documents. 45. Resident Project Representative or RPR - The authorized representative of OPT assigned to assist OAR at the Site. As used herein, the term Resident Project Representative includes assistants and field staif of the OAR. 46. Samples - Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship representing some portion of the Work that are used to establish the standards for that portion of the Work. 47. Schedule of Documents - A schedule of required documents, prepared, and maintained by Contractor. 48. Schedule of Values - A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, allocating portions of the Contract Price to various portions of the Work and used as the basis for Contractor's Applications for Payment. 49. Selected Bidder - The Bidder to which Owner intends to award the Contract. 50. Shop Drawings - All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information that are slly prepared or assembled and submitted by Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. Shop Drawingswhether approved or not, are not Drawings and are not Contract Documents. 51. Site - Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by Owner upon which the Work is to be performed. The Site includes rights-of-way, easements, and other lands furnished by Owner which are designated for use by the Contractor. 52. Specifications - The part of the Contract that describes the requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards, and workmanship as applied to the Work, and certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable to the Work. 53. Subcontractor - An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with other Subcontractors or Suppliers for the performance of a part of the Work. 54. Substantial Completion - The point where the Work or a specified part of the Work is sufficiently complete to be used for its intended purpose in accordance with the Contract Documents. 55. Supplementary Conditions - The part of the Contract that amends or supplements the General Conditions. 56. Supplier-Amnanufactunar,fabricatur,nupp|har distributor, mnateha|mnan,prvendor having a direct contract with Contractor or with Subcontractors or other Suppliers to furnish materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work. 57. Technical Data - Those items expressly identified as Technical Data in the Supplementary Conditions with respect to either: a. Subsurface conditions at the Site; Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 6 EXHIBIT "G" b. Physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site, except Underground Facilities; or c. Hazardous Environmental Conditions at the Site. 58. UndargnoundFacOities-AJ|under@round pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires, manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, other similar facilities or appurtenancesand encasements containing these facilities which are used to convey electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications, fiber optic transmissions, cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other Iiquids or chemicals, or traffic or other control systems. 59' Unit Price Work - Work to be paid for on the basis of unit prices. 60. Work - The construction of the Pject or its component parts as required by the Contract Documents. 61. Work Change Directive - A directive issued to Contractor an or after the Effective Date of the Contract ordering an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work. The Work Change Directive serves as a memorandum of understanding regarding the directive until a Change Ordercan be issued. 1.02 Terminology A. The words and terms discussed in this Paragraph 1.02 are not defined, but when used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning. O. It is understood that the cost for performing Work is included in the Contract Price and no additional compensation is to be paid by Owner unless specifically stated otherwise in the Contract Documents. Expressions including ar sirnilar to "at no additional cost to Owner" "at Contractor's expense," or similar words mean that the Contractor is to perform or provide specified operation of Work without an increase in the Contract Price. C. The terms "day" or "calendar day" mean a calendar day of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight. D. The meaning and intent of certain terms or adjectives are described as follows: 1. The terms "as allowed," "as approved," "as ordered," "as directed," or similar terms in the Contract Documents indicate an exercise of professional judgment by the OPT. 2. Adjectives including or similar to "reasonable," "suitable," "acceptable," "proper," "satisfactory," or similar adjectives are used to describe a determination of OPT regarding the Work. 3. Any exercise of professional judgment by the OPT will be made solely to evaluate the Work for general compliance with the Contract Documents unless there is a specific statement in the Contract Documents indicating otherwise. 4. The use of these or similar terms or adjectives does not assign a duty or give OPT authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work, or assign a duty or give authority to the OPT to undertake responsibilities contrary to the provisions of Articles 9 or 10 or other provisions of the Contract Documents. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 GeneraConditions 7Page 7 of 14 EXHIBIT "G" E The use of the words "furnish7 "instaII7 "perform7 and 'provide" have the foliowing meanings when used in connection with servicesmaterials, or equipment: 1. Furnish means to supply and deliver the specified services, materials, or equipment to the Site or other specified !ocation ready for use or installation. 2. Install means to complete construction or assembly of the specified services, materials, or equipment 50 they are ready for their intended use. 3. Perform or provide means to furnish and install specified services, materials, or equipment, complete and ready for their intended use. 4. Perform or provide the specified services, materials, or equipment complete and ready for intended use if the Contract Documents require specific services, materials, or equipment, but do not expressly use the words "furnish," "install," "perform," or "provide." F. Contract Documents are written in modified brief style: 1. Requirements apply to all Work of the same kind, class, and type even though the word "all" is not stated. J. Simple imperative sentence structure is used which places a verb as the first word in the sentence. It is understood that the words "furnish," "install," "perform,' "provide," or similar words include the meaning of the phrase "The Contractor shall..." before these words. 3. Unless lly stated thaaction is to be taken by the OPT or athers, it is understood that the action described is a requirement ofthe Contractor. G. Words or phrases that have a well-known technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in accordance with this recognized meaning unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents. H. Written documents are required where reference is made to noticesreports, approvals, consents, documents, statements, instructions, opinions or other types of communications required by the Contract Documents. Approval and consent documents must be received by Contractor prior to the action or decision for which approval or consent is given. These may be made in printed or electronic format through the OPT's pject management information system or other electronic media as required by the Contract Documents or approved by the OAR. L Giving notice as required by the Contract Documents may be by printed or electronic media using a method that requires ackment of the receipt of that notice. ARTICLE 2 — PRELIMINARY MATTERS ARTICLE 3—CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: INTENT, REQUIREMENTS, REUSE 3.01 Intent B. Provide equipment that is functionally complete as described in the Contract Documents. The Drawings and Specifications do not indicate or describe all of the Work required to complete the installation of products purchased by the Owner or Contractor. Additional Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 8 details required for the correct installation of selected products are to be provided by the Contractor and coordinated with the Designerthrough the OAR. 3.02 Reference Standards B. Comply with applicable construction istandards whether referenced or not 1. Standards referenced in the Contract Documents govern over standards not referenced but recognized as applicable in the construction industry. Z. Comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents if they produce a higher quality of Work than the applicable construction industry standards. 3. Designer determines whether a code or standard is applicable, which of several are applicable, or if the Contract Documents produce a higher quality of Work. 3.03 Reporting and Resolving Discrepancies 3J04 Interpretation of the Contract Document A. Submit questions concerning the non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents to the OAR immediately after those questions arise. OAR is to provide an interpretation of the Contract Documents regarding these questions and will coordinate the response of the OPTto Contractor. B. Submit questions regarding the design of the Pject described in the Contract Documents to the OAR immediately after those questions arise. OAR 15 to request an interpretation of the Contract Documents from the Designer. Designer is to respond to these questions by providing an interpretation of the Contract Documents. OAR will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. C. OPT may initiate a Modification to the Contract Documents through the OAR if a response to the question indicates that a change in the Contract Documents 15 required. Contractor may appeal Designer's or OAR's interpretation by submitting a Change Proposal. ARTICLE 4—COMMENCEMENT AND PROGRESS OF THE WORK ARTICLE 5—AVAILABILITY OF LANDS; SUBSURFACE AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONS; H RDOUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 5.01 Availability of Lands 512 Use of Site and Other Areas 5.03 Subsurface and Physical Conditions 5.04 Differing Subsurface or Physical Conditions A. Notify OAR immediately, but in no event later than 3 daysafter becoming aware of a subsurface or physical condition that is uncovered or revealed at the Site, and before Excerpt from Form OO720JGeneral Conditions'8 EXHIBIT "G" further disturbing the subsurface ar physical conditions or performing any related Work that: 1. Establishes that the Technical Data on which Contractor is entitled to rely as provided in Paragraph 5.03 is materially inaccurate; 2. Requires a change in the Drawings or Specifications; 3, Differs materially from that shown or indicated in the Contract Documents; or 4. Is of an unusual nature and differs materially from conditions ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract Documents. Do not further disturb or perform Work related to this subsurface or physicalcondition, except in an emergency as required by Paragraph 7.12, until permission to do so is issued by OAR. B. OAR is to notify the OPT after receiving notice of a differing subsurface or physical condition from the Contractor. Designer 15 to: 1. Promptly review the subsurface or physical condition; Z. Determine the necessity of OPT's obtaining additional exploration or tests with respect the subsurface or physical ccndition; 3. Determine if the subsurface or physical condition falls within one or more of the differing Site condition categories in Paragraph 5.04,A; 4. Prepare recommendations to OPT regarding the Contractor's resumption of Work in connection with the subsurface or physical condition in question; S. Determine the need for changes in the Drawings or Specifications; and 6. Advise OPT of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations, C. OAR is to issue a statement to Contractor regarding the subsurface or physical condition in question and recommend action as appropriate after review of Designer's findings, concIusions and recommendations. 5.05 Underground Facilities A. The information and data shown or indicated in the Contract Documents with respect to existing Underground Facilities at or adjacent to the Site is based on information and data furnished to OPT by the owners of these Underground Facilities or by others. OPT 15 not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of information or data provided by others that OPT makes available to Contractor. The Contractor is responsible for: 1. Reviewing and checking available information and data regarding existing Underground Facilities at the Site; 2. Complying with Laws and Regulations related to locating Underground Facilities before beginning Work; 3. Locating Underground Facilities shown or indicated in the Contract Documents; 4. Coordinating the Work with the owners, including Owner, of Underground Facilities during construction; and EXHIBIT "G" Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 10 S. The safety and protectionof existing Underground Facilities at or adjacent to the Site and repairing damage resulting from the Work. B. Notify the OAR and the owner ofthe Underground Facility immediately ifan an Underground Facility is uncovered or revealed at the Site that was not shown in the Contract Documents, or was not shown with reasonable accuracy in the Contract Documents. Do not further disturb conditions or perform Work affected by this discovery, except in the event of an emergency as required by Paragraph 7.12. C. The Designer is to take the following action after receiving notice from the OAR: 1. Promptly review the Underground Facility and conclude whether the Underground Facility was not shown or indicated in the Contract Documents, or was not shown or indicated with reasonable accuracy; 2. Prepare recomrnendations to OPT regarding the Contractor's resumption of Work in connection with this Underground Facility; 3. Deterrnine the extent to which a change is required in the Drawings or Specifications to document the consequences of the existence or location of the Underground Facility; and 4. Advise OAR of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations and provide revised Drawings and Specifications if required. D. OAR is to issue a statement to Contractor regarding the Underground Facility in question and recommend action as appropriate after review of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. ARTICLE 6—BONDS AND INSURANCE ARTICLE 7 — CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES ARTICLE 8 — OTHER WORK AT THE SITE ARTICLE 9 — OWNER'S AND OPT'RESPONSIBILITIES 9.01 Communications to Contractor A. OPT issues communications to Contractor through OAR except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. 9.02 Replacement of Owner's Project Team Members A. Dwner niay replace members of the OPT at its discretion. 9.03 Furnish Data A. OPT is to furnish the data required of OPT under the Contract Documents. 9'04 Pay When Due A. Owner is to make payments to Contractor when due as described in Paragraphs 15.01.D and 15.06.D. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions 11 9.05 Lands and Easements; Reports and Tests A. Owner's duties with respect to providing lands and easements are described in Paragraph 5.01. OPT will make co ' of reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions and drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site available to Contractor in accordance with Paragraph 5.03. 9.06 Insurance A. Owner's responsibilities with respect to purchasing and malntaining insurance are described in Article 6. 9.07 Modifications A. Owner's responsibilities with respect to Modifications are described in Article 11. 9.08 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals A. OPVs responsibility with respect to certain inspections,tests, and approvals are described in Paragraph 14.02. 9J09 Limitations on OPVs Responsibilities A. The OPT doenot supervise, direct, or have control or aover, and is not responsible for Contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or related safety precautions and programs, or for failure of Contractor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to the perlormance ofthe Work. OPT is not responsible for Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 9.10 Undisclosed Hazardous Environmental Condition A. OPT's responsibility for undisclosed Hazardous Environmental Conditions is described in Paragraph 5.06. 9.11 Compliance with Safety Program A. Contractor is to inform the OPT of its safety programs and OPT is to comply with the specific applicable requirements of this program. ARTICLE 10—OAR'S AND DESIGNER'S STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION 10J01 Owner's Representative A. OAR is Owner's representative. The duties and responsibilities and the Iirrtitations of authority of OAR as Owner's representative are described in the Contract Documents. 10.02 Visits to Site A. Designer is to make periodic visits to the Site to observe the progress and quality of the Work. Designer is to determine, in general, ifthe Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents based on observations macle during these visits. Designer is not required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections to check the quality or quantity of Excerpt from Form UD7IOOGeneral Conditions - 12 the Work. Designer is to inform the OPT of issues or concerns and OAR is to work with Contractor to address these issues or concerns. Designer's visits and observations are subject to the limitations on Designer's authority and responsibility described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. B. OAR is to observe the Work to check the quality and quantity of Work, implement Owner's quality assurance program, and administer the Contract as Owner's representative as described in the Contract Documents. OAR's visits and observations are subject to the limitations on OAR's authority and responsibility described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. 10.03 Resident Project Representatives A. Resident Project Representatives assist OAR in observing the progress and quality of the Work at the Site. The limitations on Resident Project Representatives' authority and responsibility are described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. 10.04 Rejecting Defective Work A. OPT has the authority to reject Work in accordance with Article 14. OAR is to issue a Defective Work Notice to Contractor and document when Defective Work has been corrected or accepted in accordance with Article 14. 10.05 Shop Drawings, Modifications and Payments A. Designer's authority related to Shop Drawings and Samples are described in the Contract Documents. B. Designer's authority related to design calculations and design drawings submitted in response to a delegation of professional design services are described in Paragraph 7.15. C. OAR and Designer's authority related to Modifications is described in Articles 11. D. OAR's authority related to Applications for Payment is described in Articles 13 and 15. 10.06 Decisions on Requirements of Contract Documents and Acceptability of Work A. OAR is to render decisions regarding non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents and will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. B. Designer is to render decisions regarding the conformance of the Work to the requirements of the Contract Documents. Designer will render a decision to either correct the Defective Work, or accept the Work under the provisions of Paragraph 14.04, if Work does not conform to the Contract Documents. OAR will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. C. OAR will issue a Request for a Change Proposal if a Modification is required. OAR will provide documentation for changes related to the non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents. Designer will provide documentation if design related changes are required. D. Contractor may appeal Designer's decision by submitting a Change Proposal if Contractor does not agree with the Designer's decision. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 13 10.07 Limitations on OAR's and Designer's Authority and Responsibilities A. OPT is not responsible for the acts or omissions of Contractor's Team. No actions or failure to act, or decisions made in good faith to exercise or not exercise the authority or responsibility available under the Contract Documents creates a duty in contract, tort, or otherwise of the OPT to the Contractor or members of the Contractor's Team. ARTICLE 11 — AMENDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; CHANGES IN THE WORK ARTICLE 12 — CLAIMS ARTICLE 13 — COST OF THE WORK; ALLOWANCES; UNIT PRICE WORK ARTICLE 14 — TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL, OR ACCEPTANCE OF DEFECTIVE WORK ARTICLE 15 — PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTOR; SET -OFFS; COMPLETION; CORRECTION PERIOD ARTICLE 16 — SUSPENSION OF WORK AND TERMINATION ARTICLE 17— FINAL RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ARTICLE 18 — MISCELLANEOUS END OF SECTION Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions -14 EXHIBIT "G" Page 14 of 14 tlaTr,rou°,alutn"n I rrrr'n) wNAlre» 11:1r1 851118) ri)155(r)8 :Dr l Sol 4...A;olrAna' (:Dr9e 1, n.r tl:;'fl AN..8 P A�uwllur . If,:"4arwu-u'pDr Ac re s N'"arro'1kW�imu°'esu"B s li4i;G1rrr;:xolr;rn Illlll(i'i" I� Inmm 51a e 555 Ipp 5ry llllllllllllllllllllr N rrl';�Vlnr-�;b u�°tlrtr c.111l tile o-r»9N'y 4 1911tVfiDuml(urmful( CITY-WIDE PROJECT 4'ier ) C3 raau°a,uir,^ 51,5115 Project Number: E16255 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT Major Ditch Improvements CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES iplVuglll�llllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111�I 111111 111111111 1111111111111111111111111r 1111111111111111111111 1111111111111111P 1111111111111111111111 11111111111r 1111111111111111111111 IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements Project Location W 2 W 0 L^.L 2 UW 114 �luulllllllll�� 11111111111111111111111111 11 '.I'0"Ip lln"�ui,iuoi uu ii IIII III q1u 11 �� �II' 14V111' U 11,1,1111111,1„1,111.1. 111111111 ollig 111111111111111111111111 '111111111111111111 1111'11'1'111111'11 II 11111111 111100011111.1 1111011 >> 1> '.-E a)4 O ,-0'� O '''-' ;6 ;-4 o 0 cdct , E a _1,-5 o'�' a� Q o 174 U ;_i E-+ N 4) , .cr o O E E ,-(i ,_, E a) ,-Tzi ,,, c,c c,1 .. ct E .. c,1 ;—, ;., t, ,-i-i (1) a) ,-0 H 60 0 O a) O c'c c'c CI) "Ci .4 a) Ca-, a ;_i a) —4 a) < .P_I p_i e_1-1 c' ,c . . . El. UW Project Schedule Humumm11111 p161, Project Estimate: 570 Calendar Days N 19 Months CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-73614 Date Filed: 06/20/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of business. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. Houston, TX United States of the business entity's place the contract for which the form is 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification description of the services, E12191 IDIQ Major Ditch Improvements number used by the governmental entity goods, or other property to be provided of Interested Party or state agency to track or identify the contract, under the contract. City, State, Country (place of business) and provide a Nature of interest (check applicable) 4 Name Controlling Intermediary Daly, Leo Washington, DC United States X Daly, Grega Washington, DC United States X Petersen, Dennis Houston, TX United States X Cohen, Arnie Austin, TX United States X Vajdani, Sima Los Angeles, CA United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX Sworn 20 :; COURTNEY "4�p94M' PA r ,�,• A allotary Public, Comm. Expires p 0 Notary NOTARY STAMP / to and subscribed 1 www, to certify which, CASTELLANOS State of 02-25-2020 ID 130554662 SEAL ABOVE before me, b Y witness my Texas the said hand and I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. P seal of offi e, ! Sr r Attttr, g of authorized ' gent of contracting agent .w 2,I5f this the_, business entity day of Signature of�flffscer ° • .. sferpr��q M t� I�rinte't name of officer acfmitil . teoath Title of ocer admini a tertg oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 6, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Steve Viera, Director Human Resources SteveV(c�cctexas.com 361 826-3445 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services — Purchasing Division Kim B2(ccctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Employee Assistance Program Services CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment to the contract with Family Counseling Services of Corpus Christi, Texas, not to exceed $20,000. The value of the service agreement for the full contract period of September 26, 2013 through September 30, 2017 is a not -to -exceed amount of $69,958. PURPOSE: This item is to provide Employee Assistance Program counseling services for March 2017 through September 2017. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Family Counseling Service provides Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) for City staff. An integral part of Human Resources Management, the EAP counselors provide counseling to troubled employees. Employee relations refers cases such as suspicion of alcohol and/or drug use to EAP counselors as well. This request is for the current fiscal year funding only. An RFB was just completed and the award for FY 2018 was also granted to this vendor. ALTERNATIVES: No alternatives, as services must be provided. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: N/A CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures along with the State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: N/A DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Human Resources FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $302,050 $0 $302,050 Encumbered / Expended Amount $252,058 $252,058 This item $20,000 $0 $20,000 BALANCE $29,992 $0 $29,992 Fund(s): Health Benefits RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Amendment Amendment City of Corpus Christi Purchasing Department Service Agreement No.: 311 Amendment No.: 4 Service Agreement Current Value: $49,958.00 Date: June 11, 2017 The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Family Counseling Service, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, do hereby make and enter into this Amendment which, together with the Service Agreement No. 311 and all other duly executed Amendments, constitutes the entire agreement under the above - referenced Service Agreement between the City and the Contractor. This contract was awarded beginning September 26, 2013 for a one year term with three additional one year extension periods with an estimated annual fee expenditure of $13,184.00 based on actual service provided per calendar year. During the first year term of the contract from September 26, 2013 thru September 25, 2014, $12,733.00 was expended, following amendment 1, 2 and 3 extension renewals expenses of $14,607.00 (September 26, 2014 thru September 25, 2015), $9,434.00 (September 26, 2015 thru June 10, 2016) and $13,184.00 (June 11, 2016 thru June 10, 2017) for a combined current contract value of $49,958.00 for the period of September 26, 2013 thru June 10, 2017. The three additional one year extensions terms were amended by Amendment 2 and 3 to increase the estimated annual fee expenditures. This Amendment only modifies the Agreement performance dates and options to extend under the above -referenced service agreement, effective through the end date of the above - referenced service agreement: 1. Current Agreement Performance Dates - 06/11/2016-07/10/2017 for 3rd extension 2. Revised Agreement Performance Dates - 06/11/2017-09/30/2017 for 4th extension COMMODITY EFFECTIVE DATES Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Services 06/11/2017-09/30/2017 The value of this amendment is not to exceed $20,000.00 for the term of June 11, 2017 thru September 30, 2017, therefore the full value of this service agreement based on actual service provided per calendar year is a not to exceed $69,958.00 for the term of September 26, 2013 thru September 30, 2017. The Contractor and the City agree to and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the original Service Agreement and any Amendments to that Agreement, to the extent they are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment. David Scholl- Date Family Counseling Service, Inc. Maria Pedraza Procurement Manager City of Corpus Christi, Texas Date AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 19, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Steve Viera, Director Human Resources SteveV(cr�cctexas.com 361-826-3445 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services -Purchasing Division Kim B2(cr�cctexas.com 361-826-3169 Employee Assistance Program CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement with Family Counseling Service of Corpus Christi, Texas to provide employee assistance program services for the Corpus Christi City employees and their families in response to Request for Bid No. 1244 based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $15,840, and is being budgeted in FY2017-18 through the annual budget appropriations. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $79,200. PURPOSE: This service agreement is for employee assistance program services for City staff. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Family Counseling Service provides Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) for City staff. An integral part of Human Resources Management, the EAP counselors provide counseling to troubled employees. Employee relations refer cases such as suspicion of alcohol and/or drug use to EAP counselors as well. The Purchasing Division conducted a competitive Request for Bid process to obtain bids for a new contract. The City received three responsive, responsible bids, and is recommending the award to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Family Counseling Service. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Human Resources FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $0 $79,200 $79,200 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0 $0.00 $0 This item $0 $79,200 $79,200 BALANCE $0 $0.00 $0 Fund(s): General Fund Comments: The initial contract is for an amount not to exceed $15,840.00, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $79,200. Annual funding will be requested during future budget years. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Bid Tabulation BID TABULATION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI RFB 1244 - Employee Assistance Program PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: MINERVA ALVARADO Family Counseling Service Corpus Christi, TX X 12 Mos $ 15,840.00 EXTENDED PRICE 0 0 0 i- 0 0 0 N M c-1 i/? w H U Z E D a 0 O O 00 O Deer Oaks EAP Services, LLC San Antonio, TX X 12 Mos 0 0 O Ln lD m i. EXTENDED PRICE O O O i/? $ 2,887.50 w H U EE D O O to Lnci O -1 i � Workers Assistance Program, Inc. Austin, TX X 12 Mos 0 O O m m M m i. EXTENDED PRICE O O O -L4 O LnN N N N H wo Z U a O i O tm- >- Hc Cf -I O Ln N n N H Z D W W DESCRIPTION Start up Fee Counseling Services -Per Employee, Per Month (Estimated Qty) 2 W H c -I N SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 1244 Employee Assistance Program THIS Employee Assistance Program Service Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and Family Counseling Service ("Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Employee Assistance Program services in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 1244 ("RFB/RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: Scope. Contractor will provide Employee Assistance Program services ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to four additional 12 -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $15,840.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Page 1 of 7 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Rose Bond Human Resources Department 361-826-3878 RoseB2@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re -worked immediately at no Page 2 of 7 charge to the City. If immediate correction or re -working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is Page 3 of 7 responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Rose Bond Health Benefits Manager 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Fax: 361-826-3322 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Family Counseling Service Attn: David Schroll, MS, LPC -S, LSOTP 3833 S. Staples, #5203, Corpus Christi, TX 78411 Fax: 361-852-2794 17. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' Page 4 of 7 COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Page 5 of 7 Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties; Business Associate Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. Contractor must also execute the attached HIPAA Business Associate Agreement ("Attachment E"), the content of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set out herein in its entirety. Contractor acknowledges and agrees, pursuant to this Agreement and the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (the "Act"), as amended, Contractor is subject to the terms and conditions of the Act and Attachment E. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) Page 6 of 7 CONTR Signature: Printed Name: Title: _E-)L C,Lin I eLC.,17) Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Attachment E: HIPAA Business Associate Agreement Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 1244 Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response Page 7 of 7 Attachment A: Scope of Work Scope of Work 1. General Requirements A. The Contractor shall provide an employee assistance program counseling and services as outlined in this Scope of Work. B. The City reserves the right to audit Contractor performance by reviewing pertinent records and documentation, including clinical records, subject to appropriate confidentiality requirements. 2. Scope of work A. The Contractor shall provide the following services and access levels. 1. Toll-free clinical referral line 24 hours a day 2. Three (3) visits with a licensed, experienced EAP provider for employee, employee's spouse, employee's dependent children 3. Dependent/Elder care referrals and assistance 4. Online EAP resources 5. Onsite assistance workshops 6. Dedicated account management tea 7. Quarterly reporting capabilities 8. Critical/Crisis Response capabilities with onsite personnel within 24 hours 9. Promotional and educational communication materials and Management training seminars; up to 12 sessions per year B. The Contractor must be properly licensed to conduct employee assistance program counseling and services. C. Contractor must provide online capabilities and services for member access. 3. Work Site and Conditions The Contractor shall have Call Center located in continental United States. The Contractor must provide call center procedures to include how each EAP call is handled, how many rings before any call is answered, and if a call is answered by clinician, follow up calls. 4. Contractor Quality Control and Superintendence The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. Page 1 of 2 5. Special Instructions A. The Contractor shall conduct customer satisfaction surveys and provide a copy of most recent results to the City. B. Contractor shall be responsible for any materials printing and or mailing cost. Page 2 of 2 Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BID FORM PURCHASING DIVISION RFB No 1244 Employee Assistance Program Bidder: Family Counseling Service Authorized Signature: PAGE 1 OF 1 1. Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Contract Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price for each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. The prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices. b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer, and the Disclosure of Interest information on file with City's Purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true. c. Bidder is current with all taxes due and company is in good standing with all applicable governmental agencies. d. Bidder acknowledges receipt and review of all addenda for this RFB. Item Description i UNIT QTY Unit Total Price , I Price , 1 Start up Fee EA 1 0 0 Counseling Services -Per Employee, 2 EA 2750 .48 $1,320 monthly Per Month (Estimated Qtyl Total $1 5,840 yearly 1 .1 Attachment C: Insurance Insurance Requirements A. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE 1. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained_and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 2. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Health Department one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability Statutory and complies with Part B of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 Page 1 of 4 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY $1,000,000.00 each claim $2,000,000.00 Each Policy Year Aggregate 3. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. B. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. 2. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. 3. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 4. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named Page 2 of 4 insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 5. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 6. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 7. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. 8. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. 9. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. Page 3 of 4 2017 Insurance Requirements Purchasing — Human Resources Benefits Employee Assistance Program and Counseling Services 06/22/2017 sw Risk Management Page 4 of 4 Attachment C: Bonds Section 5B. Bond is Null for this Service Agreement. Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Section 8. Warranty is null for this Service Agreement. ATTACHMENT E BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Privacy Agreement ("Agreement") is effective upon signing this Agreement and is entered into by and between City of Corpus Christi ("City") and Family Counseling Service, as Contractor (the "Business Associate"). 1. Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for the duration of Service Agreement No. 1244 the Business Associate has with the City to provide employee assistance program services and shall apply to all of the Services provided by the Business Associate pursuant to this Agreement. 2. HIPAA Assurances. In the event Business Associate creates, receives, maintains, or otherwise is exposed to personally identifiable or aggregate patient or other medical information defined as Protected Health Information ("PHI") in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 or its relevant regulations ("HIPAA") and otherwise meets the definition of Business Associate as defined in the HIPAA Privacy Standards (45 CFR Parts 160 and 164), Business Associate shall: (a) Recognize that HITECH (the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009) and the regulations thereunder (including 45 C.F.R. Sections 164.308, 164.310, 164.312, and 164.316), apply to a business associate of the City in the same manner that such sections apply to the City; (b) Not use or further disclose the PHI, except as permitted by law; (c) Not use or further disclose the PHI in a manner that had City done so, would violate the requirements of HIPAA; (d) Use appropriate safeguards (including implementing administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for electronic PHI) to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of and to prevent the use or disclosure of the PHI other than as provided for by this Agreement; (e) Comply with each applicable requirements of 45 C.F.R. Part 162 if the Business Associate conducts Standard Transactions for or on behalf of the City; (f) Report promptly to the City any security incident or other use or disclosure of PHI not provided for by this Agreement of which Business Associate becomes aware; (g) Ensure that any subcontractors or agents who receive or are exposed to PHI (whether in electronic or other format) are explained the Business Associate obligations under this paragraph and agree to the same restrictions and conditions; (h) Make available PHI in accordance with the individual's rights as required under the HIPAA regulations; (i) Account for PHI disclosures for up to the past six (6) years as requested by Page 1 of 3 City, which shall include: (1) Dates of disclosure, (2) names of the entities or persons who received the PHI, (3) a brief description of the PHI disclosed, and (4) a brief statement of the purpose and basis of such disclosure; (j) Make its internal practices, books, and records that relate to the use and disclosure of PHI available to the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services for purposes of determining Customer's compliance with HIPAA; and (k) Incorporate any amendments or corrections to PHI when notified by Customer or enter into a Business Associate Agreement or other necessary Agreements to comply with HIPAA. 3. Termination upon Breach of Provisions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City may immediately terminate this Agreement and the Service Agreement if it determines that Business Associate breaches any term in this Agreement. Alternatively, City may give written notice to Business Associate in the event of a breach and give Business Associate five (5) business days to cure such breach. City shall also have the option to immediately stop all further disclosures of PHI to Business Associate if City reasonably determines that Business Associate has breached its obligations under this Agreement. In the event that termination of these Agreements is not feasible, Business Associate hereby acknowledges that the City shall be required to report the breach to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, notwithstanding any other provision of these Agreements to the contrary. 4. Return or Destruction of Protected Health Information upon Termination. Upon the termination of this Agreement, unless otherwise directed by City, Business Associate shall either return or destroy all PHI received from the City or created or received by Business Associate on behalf of the City in which Business Associate maintains in any form. Business Associate shall not retain any copies of such PHI. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Business Associate determines that returning or destroying the Protected Health Information is infeasible upon termination of this Agreement, Business Associate shall provide to City notification of the condition that makes return or destruction infeasible. To the extent that it is not feasible for Business Associate to return or destroy such PHI, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall survive such termination or expiration and such PHI shall be used or disclosed solely as permitted by law for so long as Business Associate maintains such Protected Health Information. 5. No Third Party Beneficiaries. The parties agree that the terms of this Agreement shall apply only to themselves and are not for the benefit of any third party beneficiaries. 6. De -Identified Data. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement, Business Associate and its subcontractors may disclose non -personally identifiable information provided that the disclosed information does not include a key or other mechanism that would enable the information to be identified. 7. Amendment. Business Associate and City agree to amend this Agreement to the Page 2 of 3 extent necessary to allow either party to comply with the Privacy Standards, the Standards for Electronic Transactions, the Security Standards, or other relevant state or federal laws or regulations created or amended to protect the privacy of patient information. Ali such amendments shall be made in a writing signed by both parties. 8. Interpretation. Any ambiguity in this Agreement shall be resolved in favor of a meaning that permits City to comply with the then most current version of HIPAA and the HIPAA privacy regulations. 9. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to them as outlined in HIPAA and its related regulations. 10. Survival. The obligations imposed by this Agreement shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. CONTRA Signature: Printed Name:DAV I D 60-1..POLL Title: G)cEJATh) E(1.--Dk Date: q_)tj Q.0 n CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Approved as to legal form: , 2017 Elizabeth Hundley Assistant City Attorney for Miles Risley, City Attorney Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE QF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no lnterested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-256552 Date Filed: 09/05)2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Family Counseling Service Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a ' description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Contract # 1244 Employee Assistance Program 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT wear, ar affrm ..., penalty of perjury, that t above disclosure is true and correct. PATRICIA ZAPATA :.`„6``,1„.•••P„:9;' - Notary Pubhc, State of Texas - .-,•. ..1-4,- Comm, Expires 03-13-2021 SN''6.i'fc,c•-',.., . " -....„ __________ Notary 10 11208221 Sionature of authonzed agent of contractrg busress entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said 1,----)(4U II C , "--)C 1 ( `--- ' , , lti ', 11 t -- day of ,--,,.” this the ° - - _ 20 I 1 to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. - ) tA 171„ i ( il L'. A - '.;,(7) bC\ \I f)TilcAe a1 Signature o ,officer 'dministering oath Toleriste Printed name of officer administering oath gt of off r dmi oath . Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Item for the City Council Meeting of September 19, 2017 Second Reading Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 11, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkW@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 FROM: Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Finance constancep@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 Ordinance Appropriating Fund Proceeds Fiscal Year 2016 - 2017 CAPTION: Ordinance appropriating amounts of: (a) $29,800.19; (b) $1,328,756.52; (c) $1,822,527.28; (d) $112,416.90; and (e) $172,471.79; into the Airport CIP, Bond Proceeds, Utility Revenue Bond, Specialty Bond Proceeds and other Unappropriated Funds, respectively, for the following purposes: City's match for future FAA Grant Projects, Bayfront, Public Facilities, Fire, Police, Public Health and Safety, Sanitary Landfill, Library, Convention Center, Parks, and Streets, and as further detailed in Attachment 1; changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase expenditures accordingly. PURPOSE: This item will appropriate all unappropriated capital proceeds accrued from June 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 in the City's respective Capital Improvement Program Funds. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This agenda item is a routine practice to efficiently manage City finances and provides additional funds which can be used for approved projects within the funds from which earned and debt service payments. It also facilitates the closure of older funds to comply with arbitrage regulations and is a responsible fiduciary practice for governmental accounting. These unappropriated capital revenues come from a variety of sources including interest earnings, miscellaneous revenues collected, and reimbursements. (See Attachment A). Miscellaneous funding for this year includes bond claims, street assessments collected, and property rental revenue for construction yard site. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Appropriate the funds as recommended. 2. Do not appropriate funds (not recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to statutes regarding the City's financial policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Finance Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 16-17 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 0 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 3,465,972.68 3,465,972.68 BALANCE 3,465,972.68 3,465,972.68 Fund(s): This item will appropriate $3,465,972.68 in interest and other revenues to the funds listed in Attachment One. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommend the approval of this item so the unappropriated funds can be appropriated into their corresponding funds. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Attachment One - Appropriations Ordinance Ordinance appropriating amounts of: (a) $29,800.19; (b) $1,328,756.52; (c) $1,822,527.28; (d) $112,416.90; and (e) $172,471.79 into the Airport CIP, Bond Proceeds, Utility Revenue Bond, Specialty Bond Proceeds and other Unappropriated Funds, respectively, for the following purposes: City's match for future FAA Grant Projects, Bayfront, Public Facilities, Fire, Police, Public Health and Safety, Sanitary Landfill, Library, Convention Center, Parks, and Streets, and as further detailed in Attachment 1; changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase expenditures accordingly. NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: Section 1. An amount of $29,800.19 in Airport Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) interest earnings is appropriated in the funds as listed in Attachment 1, Section 1 for the City's match for future FAA Grant Projects. Section 2. An amount of $1,328,756.52 in Bond Proceed interest earnings for Bayfront, Public Facilities, Fire, Police, Public Health and Safety, Sanitary Landfill, Library, Convention Center, Parks, and Streets is appropriated in the funds as listed in Attachment 1, Section 2 for the stated bond projects not yet complete, similar projects to be approved by City Council and/or the payment of debt service. Section 3. An amount of $1,822,527.28 in Utility Revenue Bond interest earnings is appropriated in the funds as listed in Attachment 1, Section 3 for the support of the City's approved Capital Improvement Program. Section 4. An amount of $112,416.90 in Specialty Bond Proceed interest earnings, Sales Tax Bonds for the Seawall and Arena, Packery Channel Bonds, and Energy Efficiency Bonds is appropriated in the funds as listed in Attachment 1, Section 4 for the stated bond projects not yet complete, the support of the City's approved Capital Improvement Program, specific military supported projects and/or as determined by the Type A Board. Section 5. An amount of $172,471.79 in Other Appropriated Funds for street assessments, property rental and project refund is appropriated in the funds as listed in Attachment 1, Section 5 for the repair of city streets and other street expenses to be approved by City Council. Section 6. The FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 is changed to increase expenditures by $3,465,972.68. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Mayor Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Mayor Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel Unappropriated Revenue From Capital Improvement Funds From 06/01/2016 to 06/30/2017 SECTION 1 : AIRPORT Amount 3018 Airport CIP Fund (Capital Reserves) 12,362.24 3019 Airport CIP Fund (Other) 2,487.02 3024 Airport 2000A CIP Fund (Rev) 913.95 3025 Airport 2000B Rev/2012 GO 68.91 3026 Airport 2012 CO CIP Fd 11,980.90 4621 AIRPORT PFC (2) FUND (4621) 1,910.87 4631 Airport CFC 2010 CO CIP fund 76.30 AIRPORT TOTAL 29,800.19 SECTION 2 : BOND PROCEEDS Amount 3126 Bayfront Dev 09 GO CIP (Bnd08) 43,192.61 3160 City Facilities CIP Fund 729.23 3162 Public Fclty 2013 GO Bd 2012 10,117.60 3164 FACMaint CIP 2015 CO 7,333.97 3191 Fire Impry 09 GO CIP Fd(Bnd08) 13,339.03 3341 Police Imp 09 GO CIP Fd(Bnd08) 0.00 3342 Police 2013 GO (Bond 2012) 4,206.89 3359 Public H & S 2004 CIP Fund (CO) 32.86 3365 Sanitary Landfill 2008 CIP(CO) 1,175.84 3366 Public H&S 2013 GO CIP Bd 2012 1,065.09 3367 Landfill 2015 COS 22,915.68 PUBLIC H&S TOTAL 104,108.80 3226 Library 09 GO CIP Fd (Bond 08) 593.37 3182 Convention Center 2010 CIP Fund (CO) 203.20 3280 Park CIP 1,628.71 3289 Park & Rec 2005 CIP Fund (GO) 458.10 3291 Park&Rec 09 GO CIP Fd (Bond08) 1,689.59 3292 Parks & Rec 2010 GO (Bond 08) 4,082.28 3293 Parks & Rec 2013 GO (Bd 2012) 69,716.10 3294 Park and Rec 2015 GO (Bd 2014) 45,593.98 PARK TOTAL 123,168.76 SECTION 2 : BOND PROCEEDS (continued) Amount 3530 Street CIP Fund 3,410.57 3541 Street 2005 CIP Fund (GO) 12,129.58 3545 Street 08 TN CIP Fund (NT) 758.80 3546 Street 09 GO CIP Fd (Bond 08) 20,568.73 3548 Street 2012 GO CIP Fd Bond 08 60,866.55 3549 Street 2013 GO CIP (Bd 2012) 230,591.05 3550 Streets 2013 TN (Bd 2014 Dsgn) 17,988.00 3551 Streets 2015 GO BD 14 633,713.10 3552 Street 2016 CO BD 12 106,682.98 3701 Developer Participation Bd2012 13,973.03 STREET TOTAL 1,100,682.39 BONDS TOTAL 1,328,756.52 SECTION 3 : REVENUE BONDS Amount 3480 Storm Water CIP Fund 758.02 3493 Storm Water 2012 CIP Fd (RvBd) 3,162.70 3494 Storm Water 2012A CIP Fd RvBd 24,739.85 3495 Storm Water 2012B CIP Rev Bds 115,448.17 3496 Storm Water 2012A CIP (Bd 2012 11,620.89 3497 Storm Water 2013 CIP (Rev Bds) 83,386.38 3498 Storm Water 2013 CIP (Bd 2012) 74,347.08 4525 Stormwtr 09 CIP Fd -(rev bonds) 0.02 4526 StormW 09 CIP Fd -(rev bd 08G0) 1,602.13 4528 StormW 2010A CIP REV tax-exmpt 589.98 4529 Storm Wtr 2010B REV Txbl BAB 3,575.62 4530 STWCP PL Sotrm Wtr 2015 CIP 76,202.50 4531 STWCP PL Sotrm Wtr 2015 CIP (Bd Sprt) 78,779.50 4540 Storm Water Capital Reserves 34,129.49 STORM WATER TOTAL 508,342.33 3600 Gas CIP Fund 6.07 4551 Gas 09 CIP Fund -(rev bd-08G0) 1,560.84 4556 Gas 2012A CIP (bd 2012) 113.22 4557 Gas 2013 CIP (Rev Bds) 1,795.75 4558 Gas 2013 CIP (bd 2012) 1,530.23 4559 Gascp pl gas 2015 cip 16,859.56 4560 Gas Cap Resv 1,516.06 4561 Gascp pl gas 2015 cip (Bd Sprt) 7,538.33 GAS TOTAL 30,920.06 SECTION 3 : REVENUE BONDS (continued) Amount 4080 Water CIP Fund 17,186.96 4088 Water2012 CIP Fd (RvBd) 3,070.09 4089 Water 2012A CIP Fd (RvBd) 39,886.26 4091 Water 2012B CIP Fund (Rev Bds) 53,533.81 4092 Water 2012A CIP (Bd 2012) 3,441.98 4093 Water 2013 CIP (Rev Bds) 124,167.63 4094 Water2013 CIP (Bd 2012) 17,381.12 4095 Water 2014 CIP MRP 2 210,774.39 4096 WTRCP PL Water2015 CIP 145,561.51 4097 WTRCP PL Water2015 CIP (bd sprt) 46,248.46 4476 Water 09 CIP Fd (rev bd-08G0) 77.69 4478 Water 2010A CIP REV tax-exmpt 2,080.30 4479 Water 2010B REV Txbl BAB 11,149.49 4481 Raw Water Supply Development Charge CIP 13,021.35 WATER TOTAL 687,581.04 3430 Wastewater CIP Fund 149.05 4247 Wastewater2012 CIP Fd (RvBd) 627.26 4248 Wastewater2012A CIP Fd (RvBd) 9,443.13 4249 Wastewater 2012B CIP (Rev Bds) 91,796.46 4250 Wastewater 2006 CIP Fd (Rev Bds) 116.46 4251 Wastewater2012A CIP (Bd 2012) 2,647.40 4252 Wastewater2013 CIP (Bd 2012) 148,643.51 4253 Wastewater2013 CIP (Rev Bds) 15,721.50 4254 WWWCP PL Wastewater 2015 CIP 203,861.90 4255 WWWCP Wastewater 2015 CIP 39,779.98 4501 WasteW 09 CIP Fd-(rev bd-08G0) 760.64 4504 Wastewater 2010B REV Txbl BAB 4,831.91 4510 Wastewater Capital Reserves 77,304.65 WASTEWATER TOTAL 595,683.85 REVENUE BONDS TOTAL 1,822,527.28 SECTION 4 : SPECIALTY BONDS & OTHER CIP Amount 3542 Street 2007A-1 CIP (TMPC GO) 4,862.63 3543 Street 2007A-1 CIP (TMPC CO) 33,504.83 TMPC TOTAL 38,367.46 3270 Seawall CIP Fund (2002 Sales Tax Rev.Bds) 6.30 3271 Seawall System CIP Fund 2,235.11 3272 Seawall Maintenance Reserve Fd 49,204.32 3274 Arena Type A 740.85 SALES TAX BOND TOTAL 52,186.58 3163 Energy Effcny CIP 2014 PPFCO 6,847.16 6,847.16 3278 Packery Channel Projects TIF#2 14,950.23 3234 Marina 65.47 SPECIALTY BONDS & OTHER CIP TOTAL 112,416.90 SECTION 5 : OTHER UNAPPROPRIATED FUNDS Amount 3280 Park Insurance Claim 29,943.70 3530 Street CIP: Street Assessments 67,528.09 3530 Street CIP: Property Rentals 75,000.00 Other Unappropriated Total 172,471.79 GRAND TOTAL 3,465,972.68 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of Octoberl0, 2017 DATE: September 5, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: William J. Green, P.E., Interim Director, Development Services Department BilIG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3268 Closing of a utility easement located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway. CAPTION: Ordinance abandoning and vacating 0.303 acre of an existing utility easement out of a part of Bohemian Colony Lands, Section 7, Lot 2, located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway and requiring the owner, AEP Texas Central Company, to comply with the specified conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this ordinance is to eliminate a portion of a utility easement to allow for AEP Texas Central Company to construct a new service center. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: AEP Texas Central Company (Owner) is requesting the abandonment and vacation of a 0.303 acre utility easement out of a part of Bohemian Colony Lands, Section 7, Lot 2, located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway. This abandonment and vacation of the utility easement is being requested by the owner in conjunction with the construction of a new service center. The existing utility easement is unimproved with no public and private utilities. Staff recommends the owner pay no fair market value fee. AEP Texas Central Company (Owner) originally dedicated the easement with certain plans; however, due to changes in the plans they now request the easement closure. The Owner has been advised of and concurs with the specified conditions of the Ordinance in regards to the recording and filing of the ordinance. The Owner must also comply with all the specified conditions of the abandon and vacate ordinance within 180 days of Council approval. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the utility easement closure. This will adversely impact the Owner's ability to move forward with future development of the subject property. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: These requirements are in compliance with the City Code of Ordinances, Section 49-12 and 49-13. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: All public and franchised utilities were contacted. None of the City departments or franchised utility companies stated objections regarding the proposed utility easement abandonment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the easement closure. The Owners must comply with all the following specified conditions of the easement closure ordinance: a. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of easement closure and specified conditions must be recorded at the Owners' expense in the Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the affected property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. b. The Maintenance responsibilities for the vacated easement reverts to AEP Texas Central Company (Owner). c. Staff recommends the owner pay no fair market value fee. AEP Texas Central Company (Owner) originally dedicated the easement with certain plans; however, due to changes in the plans they now request the easement closure. d. Failure to comply with all the conditions outlined in this Ordinance within 180 days will hereby make the Ordinance null and void. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance with Exhibits Ordinance abandoning and vacating 0.303 acre of an existing utility easement out of a part of Bohemian Colony Lands, Block 7, Lot 2, located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway and requiring the owner, AEP Texas Central Company, to comply with the specified conditions. WHEREAS, AEP Texas Central Company (Owner) is requesting the abandonment and vacation of 0.303 acre of an existing utility easement out of a part of Bohemian Colony Lands, Section 7, Lot 2, located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway; WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus Christi to abandon and vacate a 0.303 acre of an existing utility easement, subject to compliance by the Owner with the conditions specified in this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the request of AEP Texas Central Company (Owner), a 0.303 acre of an existing utility easement out of a part of Bohemian Colony Lands, Section 7, Lot 2, located at 6024 Crosstown Expressway, as recorded in Volume A, Page 48 of the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, is abandoned and vacated by the City of Corpus Christi ("City"), subject to the Owners' compliance with the conditions specified in Section 2 of this ordinance. Exhibit "A," which is a metes and bounds description and field notes, "Exhibit B", which is the graphical representation of the legal, and "Exhibit C", which is the location map which are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if it was fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The abandonment and vacation of the utility easement described in Section 1 of this ordinance is expressly conditioned upon the Owners' compliance with the following requirements: a. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of easement closure and specified conditions must be recorded at the Owners' expense in the Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the affected property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. b. The maintenance responsibilities for the vacated easement reverts to AEP Texas Central Company (Owner). c. Failure to comply with all the conditions outlined in this Ordinance within 180 days will hereby make the Ordinance null and void. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor 1111111111111 r 1uerY ENGINEERS SURVEYORS AEP TEXAS INC. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS 0.303 OF AN ACRE UTILITY EASEMENT RELEASE EXHIBIT "A" BEING a portion of Lot 4 of the Cabaniss Acres No. 2 subdivision as described in volume 67, page 237, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, same also being a portion of a 15' utility easement as described and recorded in volume 67, page 237, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, same also being described by a drawing (116062_ RELEASE PARCEL 2.dwg, dated June 28, 2017) attached to and made a part hereof and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMENCENCING at a 5/8" iron rod found lying in the west right-of-way line of Ayers Street (BU286A) (100' wide right- of-way) as described in volume G, page 548, County Court Records of Nueces County, Texas, for the northeast corner of the aforementioned Lot 4 and the southeast corner of a 6.485 acre tract of land as described and recorded in document number 2016024722, Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas; THENCE leaving the west right-of-way line of Ayers Street (BU286A), along the north line of the aforementioned Lot 4, the north line of the aforementioned 15' utility easement and the south line of the aforementioned 6.485 acre tract, N61 °51' 17"W a distance of 14.77 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and the northeast corner of the herein described 0.303 of an acre tract; THENCE leaving the north line of the aforementioned Lot 4, the north line of the aforementioned 15' utility easement and the south line of the aforementioned 6.485 acre tract, S28°39'35"W a distance of 15.18 feet to a point in the south line of said 15' utility easement for the southeast corner of the herein described 0.303 of an acre tract; THENCE along the south line of the aforementioned 15' utility easement, N61°51'17"W a distance of 870.19 feet to a point in the east line of a 20' utility easement as described and recorded in volume 67, page 237, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, for the southwest corner of the herein described 0.303 of an acre tract; THENCE along the east line of the aforementioned 20' utility easement, N28°08'43"E a distance of 15.18 feet to a point in the north line of the aforementioned Lot 4, the north line of the aforementioned 15' utility easement and the south line of the aforementioned 6.485 acre tract, for the northwest corner of the herein described 0.303 of an acre tract, from which the northwest corner of said Lot 4 and the southwest corner of said 6.486 acre tract bears N61 °51' 17"W a distance of 20.01 feet; Page 1 of 2 116062_RELEASE PARCEL 2.docx June 28, 2017 3411 Magic Drive San Antonio, Texas 78229 e Phone: (210) 581-1 I I I • Fax: (210) 581-5555 a TBPE No. F-1733 a TBPLS No. 100495-00 AEP TEXAS INC. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS 0.303 OF AN ACRE UTILITY EASEMENT RELEASE THENCE leaving the east line of the aforementioned 20' utility easement, along the north line of the aforementioned Lot 4 acre tract and the south line of the aforementioned 6.485 acre tract, S61 °51' 17"E a distance of 870.33 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 0.303 of an acre of land. The bearing basis for this survey is Grid North, Texas State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 1983(HARN), South Zone. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOWN TO ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF BEXAR I, John T. Kubala, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above field notes were prepared using information obtained by an on the ground survey made under my direction and supervision in August 2014 thru January 2016. Date day ofµ,..... Page 2 of 2 116062_RELEASE PARCEL 2.docx June 28, 2017 2017 A.D. John T. Kuala Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4505 - State of Texas 341 I Magic Drive • San Antonio, Texas 78229 • Phone: (210) 581-1 I I 1 • Fax: (210) 581-5555 • TBPE No. F-1733 • TBPLS No. 100495-00 3 0 0 0 0 4,) 1- T C 0 0 0 V) co (3 W U 0 Q d Z 05 (4); N J O C1 >L N C n c+� VARIABLE TxDOT TYPE II BASS DISK MONUMENT FOUND 200' S24'47'55"W 14.37' 400' 1 - FOUND MONUMENTATION 3 O - UNMONUMENTED POINT p POB - PLACE OF BEGINNING POC - PLACE OF COMMENCEMENT I D.R.N.C. _ DENOTES DEED RECORDS OF I NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS M.R.N.C.- DENOTES MAP RECORDS OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS I R - PROPERTY LINES I TxDOT - TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S LEGEND LOT 8 LOT 7 CABANISS ACRES VOL. 10, PG. 20 M.R.N.C. LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESC. RELEASE PARCEL 2.docx CDS JOB NO. 116062 BEARING BASIS: GRID NORTH COORDINATE SYSTEM: TEXAS STATE PLANE, NAD 1983(HARN), SOUTH ZONE ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE SURFACE. (GRID X 1.00002 = SURFACE) THIS EXHIBIT REPRESENTS A BOUNDARY SURVEY ONLY. LOT 1 BOHEMIAN COLONY LANDS 1.23 ACRES OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 7, VOL. 2207, PG. 815, D.R.N.C. R. 3 0 d LOT 1—R, BLOCK 1 CABANISS ACRES NO. 2 VOL. 67, PG. 583 M.R.N.C. REMAINING PORTION OF A 0.146 OF AN ACRE DRAINAGE EASEMENT DOC. NO. 2008027124 0.P.R.N.C. R 20' UTILITY EASEMENT CABANISS ACRES NO. 2 VOL, 67, PG, 237 M.R.N.C. EE DETAIL B N28'08'43'E 15.18' 11111111111 I 200' 100' 0 S61'51'17"E 870,33' N61'51'17"W 20.01' DETAIL B NOT TO SCALE 20' UTILITY EASEMENT CABANISS ACRES N0. 2 VOL. 67, PG. 237 M.R.N.C. LOT 4 CABANISS ACRES NO. 2 VOL. 67, PG. 237 M.R.N.C. LOT 2, SECTION 7 BOHEMIAN COLONY LANDS VOL. A, PG. 48 M.R.N. C. 6.485 ACRES DOC. N0. 2016024722 0.P.R.N.C. S61'51'17"E 14.77' POB N: 17,152,693.72 E: 1,328,453.84 DETAIL A NOT TO SCALE N61'51'17"W 870.19' 15' UTILITY EASEMENT CABANISS ACRES N0. 2 VOL. 67, PG. 237 M.R.N.C. 0 fra s2 ce w H P - C/]13 0 gol I P00 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND S28'39'35"W 15.18' SEE DETAIL A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT CABANISS ACRES N0. 2 VOL. 67, PG. 237 M.R.N.C. 200' ENGINEERS « SURVEYORS 3 4 1 1 100 010 (01103 500 40003310 TEXAS 75323 • 0 1210, 5361111 7.121215613555 71632 ro 51733 • TE325130. 1.35 CO 15' UTILITY EASEMENT CABANISS ACRES NO. 2 VOL. 67, PG. 237 M.R.N.C. DRAWN BY: K.F.H. 4 4 a 50' 50' cf I 0.303 OF AN ACRE EASEMENT AEP TEXAS INC. BOHEMIAN COLONY LANDS BLOCK 7, LOT 2 NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS DATE: JUNE 28, 2017 DRAWING NAME: 116062_RELEASE PARCEL 2.DWG AMERICAN ° ELECTRIC • I u� �'P:;” imp `� 'M'I WC""' :�'�',Y.mdR V", •o„'a 1111111111111111 1111I11P1"' 9111, 111111111111111111111111111111111111„,,,,, Easement Closure AERIAL OVERVIEW 'IIN10600% 0, POW° EH 00, 160rnorn mom 111111111111111111111111111, � d, 111111,11 # + m 1111111111"""""""""1 m u Staff recommends: C!) 0 u E C!) c C!) ^0 0 ;-I^ 7:E 0 � 0 ;-I^ • AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 13, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: William J. Green, P.E., Interim Director, Development Services Department BilIG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Resolution Adopting the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan CAPTION: Resolution adopting the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to adopt the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The purpose of this Multi -Jurisdictional HMAP is to identify risks and vulnerabilities and to formulate a plan of action to reduce damage and loss of life from natural disasters. Participating communities in this plan are: Nueces County, City of Agua Dulce, City of Bishop, City of Corpus Christi, City of Driscoll, City of Petronila, City of Port Aransas, City of Robstown, and the Corpus Christi Port Authority. Local governments are required to develop a hazard mitigation plan as a condition for receiving hazard mitigation assistance grants. The benefits of a hazard mitigation action plan include reducing vulnerability to future hazards, saving lives and property, gaining disaster funding, maintaining economic stability and expediting the recovery period. The plan outlines the hazards identified by the committee that consisted of staff from all participating jurisdictions and the public, analyzes the risk those hazards pose to each jurisdiction and lists strategies for mitigating the hazards. The plan has received tentative approval through the Texas Division of Emergency Management and FEMA. To receive final approval and qualify for funding for projects listed in the plan, the jurisdiction(s) must adopt this plan. ALTERNATIVES: Not Applicable OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms with City policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital 0 Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Floodplain Management Checklist Nueces County Texas Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7/20/2017 a Section 1: Overview III 111111111111 II 11111 111111111 I Introduction 1 Scope 4 Section 2: Planning Process Plan Development 1 Resources and Existing Plans 9 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 10 Section 3: Hazard and Risk Overview Hazard Identification 1 Risk Assessment Overview 5 Section 4: Vulnerability Assessment Overview Vulnerable Assets Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Existing Assets 3 City of Agua Dulce Existing Assets 4 City of Bishop Existing Assets 5 City of Corpus Christi Existing Assets 6 City of Driscoll Existing Assets 7 City of Petronila Existing Assets 8 City of Port Aransas Existing Assets 9 City of Robstown Existing Assets 10 Port of Corpus Christi Existing Assets 11 Vulnerable Future Assets 12 Special Populations Considerations 12 Section 5: Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Hazard 7 City of Bishop Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Hazard 14 City of Petronila Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hazard 18 SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Robstown Hazard 20 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hazard 22 Section 6: Flood Flood Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Flood Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Flood Hazard 8 City of Bishop Flood Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Flood Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Flood Hazard 15 City of Petronila Flood Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Flood Hazard 19 City of Robstown Flood Hazard 21 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Flood Hazard 24 Section 7: Drought Drought Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Drought Hazard 7 City of Aqua Dulce Drought Hazard 8 City of Bishop Drought Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Drought Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Drought Hazard 11 City of Petronila Drought Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Drought Hazard 13 City of Robstown Drought Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Drought Hazard 15 Section 8: Windstorms Windstorms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorms Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Windstorms Hazard 19 City of Bishop Windstorms Hazard 21 City of Corpus Christi Windstorms Hazard 23 City of Driscoll Windstorms Hazard 25 City of Petronila Windstorms Hazards 26 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 2 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Port Aransas Windstorms Hazard 29 City of Robstown Windstorms Hazard 31 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorms Hazard 33 Section 9: Extreme Heat Extreme Heat Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Extreme Heat Hazard 5 City of Agua Dulce Extreme Heat Hazard 6 City of Bishop Extreme Heat Hazard 7 City of Corpus Christi Extreme Heat Hazard 8 City of Driscoll Extreme Heat Hazard 9 City of Petronila Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Port Aransas Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Robstown Extreme Heat Hazard 12 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Extreme Heat Hazard 13 Section 10: Lightning Lightning Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Lightning Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Lightning Hazard 7 City of Bishop Lightning Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Lightning Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Lightning Hazard 10 City of Petronila Lightning Hazard 11 City of Port Aransas Lightning Hazard 12 City of Robstown Lightning Hazard 13 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Lightning Hazard 14 Section 11: Coastal Erosion Coastal Erosion Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Coastal Erosion Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Coastal Erosion Hazard 19 City of Bishop Coastal Erosion Hazard 20 City of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 21 City of Driscoll Coastal Erosion Hazard 23 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Petronila Coastal Erosion Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Coastal Erosion Hazard 25 City of Robstown Coastal Erosion Hazard 27 Port of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 28 Section 12: Tornado Tornado Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard 13 City of Bishop Tornado Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard 16 City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard 18 City of Petronila Tornado Hazard 20 City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard 21 City of Robstown Tornado Hazard 25 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard 27 Section 13: Hailstorms Hailstorm Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hailstorm Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Hailstorm Hazard 12 City of Bishop Hailstorm Hazard 13 City of Corpus Christi Hailstorm Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Hailstorm Hazard 15 City of Petronila Hailstorm Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hailstorm Hazard 17 City of Robstown Hailstorm Hazard 18 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hailstorm Hazard 19 Section 14: Expansive Soils Expansive Soils Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Expansive Soils Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Expansive Soils Hazard 13 City of Bishop Expansive Soils Hazard 15 City of Corpus Christi Expansive Soils Hazard 17 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Driscoll Expansive Soils Hazard 22 City of Petronila Expansive Soils Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Expansive Soils Hazard 26 City of Robstown Expansive Soils Hazard 28 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Expansive Soils Hazard 30 Section 15: Dam and Levee Failure Dam and Levee Failure Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 12 City of Agua Dulce Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Bishop Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Petronila Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Robstown Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 18 Section 16: Land Subsidence Land Subsidence Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Land Subsidence Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Land Subsidence Hazard 7 City of Bishop Land Subsidence Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Land Subsidence Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Land Subsidence Hazard 11 City of Petronila Land Subsidence Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Land Subsidence Hazard 13 City of Robstown Land Subsidence Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Land Subsidence Hazard 15 Section 17: Wildfire Wildfire Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Wildfire Hazard 8 City of Agua Dulce Wildfire Hazard 10 City of Bishop Wildfire Hazard 12 City of Corpus Christi Wildfire Hazard 14 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Driscoll Wildfire Hazard 16 City of Petronila Wildfire Hazard 18 City of Port Aransas Wildfire Hazard 20 City of Robstown Wildfire Hazard 22 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Wildfire Hazard 24 Section 18: Winter Storms Severe Winter Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Severe Winter Storms Hazard 7 City of Agua Dulce Severe Winter Storms Hazard 8 City of Bishop Severe Winter Storms Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Severe Winter Storms Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Severe Winter Storms Hazard 11 City of Petronila Severe Winter Storms Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Severe Winter Storms Hazard 13 City of Robstown Severe Winter Storms Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Severe Winter Storms Hazard 15 Section 19: Mitigation Action Mitigation Strategy 1 All Participating Jurisdictions Mitigation Actions 4 Unincorporated Nueces County Mitigation Actions 6 City of Agua Dulce Mitigation Actions 50 City of Bishop Mitigation Actions 68 City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 89 City of Driscoll Mitigation Actions 141 City of Petronila Mitigation Actions 162 City of Port Aransas Mitigation Actions 182 City of Robstown Mitigation Actions 201 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Mitigation Actions 247 Section 20: Plan Maintenance Procedures Plan Maintenance Procedures 1 Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Updating 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l1111111111111 II 0 ru Continued Public Involvement 12 Appendix A: Capability Assessment Appendix B: Public Survey Appendix C: Meeting Documentation Appendix D: Critical Facilities Appendix E: Wildfire Occurrences Appendix F: Adoption Resolution Appendix G: Plan Maintenance Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7 1 If" a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 11111111 III mm1)( i trrrrrrrrrnrrn� III 1lllllll fff 1111 Introduction 1 Scope 4 Introduction Planning Area Nueces County is located on the south central coast of Texas, and has a land area of 842 square miles and a water area of 360 square miles. Figure 1-1. Nueces County Location Map Nueces County's previous Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, or Plan, was part of the regional plan sponsored by Coastal Bend Council of Governments (CBCOG). Due to state preference that plans may not include more than two counties, Nueces County has chosen to prepare a new countywide multi jurisdictional Plan for 2017. Participating jurisdictions in the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan are: • Unincorporated Nueces County, • City of Aqua Dulce, • City of Bishop, • City of Corpus Christi, • City of Driscoll, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 1 1 If" ,n • City of Petronila, • City of Port Aransas, • City of Robstown, and • Port of Corpus Christi Authority (PCCA) The geographic boundaries of the Port Authority are co -extensive with Nueces and San Patricio Counties. The Port Authority exercises jurisdiction over the waterways and public port facilities and all vessels using the waterways. The Authority's waterways mean collectively, the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, the La Quinta Channel, the Jewel Fulton Canal, Rincon Canal and the Intercoastal Waterway. For the purpose of the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan; information presented concerning the PCCA will be limited to the Nueces County portion of their jurisdiction. Additionally, for the purpose of profiling natural hazards on behalf of the PCCA, hazard location, extent, occurrence, probability, impact, and vulnerability will be limited to the PCCA owned parcels. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 2 1 P a 61, Figure 1-2. Planning Area Map A >tn 111111,, 000000e, 0000„„, 0;00000000,000000 , 11111111111111111111111111111111 11101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00000000000000000000000000000001 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 e 'I 11111111 'll'1Yio�,. POR • IIII p INlllli li IN i " '0#001 I0 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 illli II!jiidEll'�''„W 01,6.701001.00640 06,000.600%. 6 6040u0000000,iw06,, 1000c. 1000000,0 N.00 L . o,^0,00000w„0000 l^N MW111.0„o•J1u0ir 40c10.40,n0gt HA'wxiwr.d Nu0e0:4.011 C.0040.10,4 The multi -jurisdictional plan approach is effective in addressing natural hazard risk because the participating jurisdictions generally face the same natural hazards, have similar assets, and have successfully partnered in the past. Plan Participants At least one representative and one staff member from each participating jurisdiction forms the Planning Team. For purposes of defining roles, stakeholders are individuals or groups that are vested in and affected by a mitigation action or policy. Examples of stakeholders include business owners, chamber of commerce, neighborhood associations, Red Cross, hospital districts, and private organizations. Public outreach also plays an important role in the Plan development. Stakeholders and the public were encouraged to participate in the development of the Plan. Section 2 includes a list of Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 3 1 IIP ,n q00 0P Planning Team members and activities and meetings held that involved the Planning Team and the public. Hazard Mitigation Action Planning Nueces County and the jurisdictions therein are susceptible to a wide range of natural hazards, including floods, hurricanes and tropical storms, drought, extreme heat, lightning, coastal erosion, hailstorms, tornados, dam and levee failure, land subsidence, expansive soils, and wildfire. These life-threatening hazards can destroy property, disrupt the economy, and lower the overall quality of life for residence. The impact of hazards can be lessened in terms of their effect on people and property through effective hazard mitigation action planning and implementation. This Plan provides an opportunity for Nueces County and the other participating jurisdictions to evaluate successful mitigation actions and explore opportunities to reduce future disaster loss. Scope The focus of the mitigation action plan is to reduce future losses within Nueces County by identifying mitigation strategies based on a detailed hazard risk analysis, including both an assessment of regional hazards and vulnerability. The mitigation strategies seek to identify potential loss -reduction opportunities. The goal of this effort is to work towards more disaster -resistant and resilient communities throughout Nueces County. The scope of the hazards considered herein are those associated with natural hazards. Other planning frameworks exist in the region for hazards not addressed here, including man-made hazards such as security concerns, critical infrastructure protection, hazardous materials response, medical and public health response to terrorism. Agencies and organizations who may be contacted for further information on these topics include local emergency management agencies, Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs), law enforcement agencies, fire departments, state and public health departments, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, local drinking water suppliers, local offices of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the Coastal Bend Council of Governments. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 4 1 P a 111 �I llio1 1/1 ff i�ffffffffffff ii«r�i Jiiiir rur'E miirr0//00 Plan Deve opment 1 Resources and Existing Plans 9 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 10 Plan Development Mitigation planning involves bringing together community leaders to identify natural hazards threatening their community and define key actions to implement with the goal of achieving a more disaster -resistant community. This section provides an overview of the planning process, highlighting key steps as well as providing a detailed description of how stakeholders and the public were involved. Planning Team A conference call was held on December 12, 2016 with participating jurisdictions, and Lockwood Andrews and Newnam (LAN) to identify Planning Team members. The Planning Team members identified include one member from each of the participating jurisdictions (see Table 2-1). Additionally, the call included identifying Plan stakeholders, discussing options for engaging the public, and setting a date for the plan kickoff meeting. The group also reviewed and discussed the previous hazards and mitigation actions included in the 2012 regional CBCOG Plan. Planning Team members were asked to attend all workshops during the planning process. Planning Team members that did not attend workshops were contacted by phone or email, and given a recording of the conference call. Some of the responsibilities of the Planning Team included: completing Capability Assessment Surveys, providing a public survey to the general public, providing input regarding the identification of hazards, ranking hazards, identifying mitigation goals, developing new mitigation strategies, and identifying critical facilities. The Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan was organized using a direct representative model, as Nueces County acted as the direct representative for participating jurisdictions in this effort. Each participating jurisdiction also had a local planning team to execute planning tasks at the local level. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 1 1 If" ,n o�o�o��i�aoo��1� iiiii��i�i��i�i�~ titian i`� 1 1 1 u S ti Nueces County* City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop City of Corpus Christi City of Driscoll City of Petronila City of Port Aransas City of Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority Table 2-1. Planning Team 1111111122111111 Emergency Management Coordinator Mayor Mayor Floodplain Manager Mayor Mayor Emergency Management Coordinator Fire Chief / Emergency Management Coordinator Public Safety Director Manager of Emergency Managment 11111111111 Emergency Management Office of the Mayor Office of the Mayor Development Services Department Office of the Mayor Office of the Mayor Emergency Management Fire Department Security * County Emergency Management Coordinator serves the unincorporated areas of Nueces County and the cities of Agua Dulce, Bishop, Driscoll, and Petronila Planning Process In 2012 the Coastal Bend Council of Governments coordinated a regional HMAP process and secured FEMA approval for participating Counties (including Nueces) and Cities (including Agua Dulce, Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, Port Aransas & Robstown). Recognizing the need for a new plan because of a state preference for plans no larger than one county, then Nueces County Emergency Management Coordinator began informal discussions between other Emergency Management Coordinators within Nueces County on their jurisdiction's interest in participating in a joint HMAP process. Based upon the shared interest in planning together Nueces County submitted a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (DR -4223) to support the cost of hiring a consultant to assist with the planning process/plan development. Each participating jurisdiction included a letter of support for the grant. FEMA/TDEM awarded the grant in August 2016 and the process to create an Inter -local agreement also took place to share the cost and define responsibilities across the jurisdictions. All participating jurisdictions had their governing boards approve the Inter -local agreement and sign onto the planning process in fall of 2016 (including appointment of their HMAP planning team representatives and their local planning team). Also during fall 2016 a request for proposals for consultant services to develop a hazard mitigation action plan. Several proposals were received/evaluated and LAN was selected/awarded the contract. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 2 1 Ii" ,n The process used to prepare this Plan included following steps outlined in the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide (FEMA, 2013). After the Planning Team was organized, a Capability Assessment Survey was developed and distributed at the Kick -Off Workshop on January 4, 2017. Hazards were ranked by both the Planning Team and residents. Specific mitigation strategies were discussed at the Mitigation Workshop on March 29, 2017. Finally, Plan Maintenance and implementation procedures were developed and are included in Section 20. A schedule of planning activities is included as Table 2-2. m�mll'. l m January 4, 2017 March 2, 2017 March 29, 2017 April 26, 2017 May 1, 2017 Table 2-2. Schedule of Planning Tasks 1111111001H 111111111 1llo ,,,, 11111111111111111111011 V119,1u011111 nllli�111111u1'liillll!1 Il, Conduct Kickoff Meeting, Capability Assessment; identify and evaluate hazards; begin drafting MAP Conduct Risk Assessment WebEx Workshop for Planning Team; begin drafting Risk Analysis; review upcoming Mitigation Strategy objectives Conduct Mitigation Strategy WebEx Workshop for Planning Team, work with planning team to complete mitigation worksheets. Provide MAP Draft to Planning Team at public meeting for review and comment Submit MAP Draft to TDEM for review and edits September 2017 (assuming FEMA Approval of PLAN; participating jurisdictions adopt PLAN by FEMA review completed) resolution Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 3 1 P a Kickoff Workshop The Planning Team Kickoff Workshop was a Public Meeting that was held in Nueces County Commissioner's Court Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi on January 4, 2017. Adjacent jurisdictions were invited to attend by the Nueces County Emergency Management Coordinator. Nueces County served as the coordinating jurisdiction on behalf of the planning team. The initial meeting provided an opportunity to inform participating jurisdictions officials and key department personnel about how the planning process pertained to their distinct roles and responsibilities, and also to involve stakeholder groups and the general public. In addition to the kickoff presentation, participants received the following information: • Project overview regarding the planning process; • Public Survey access information; • Hazard Ranking form; • Capability Assessment survey for completion. A hazard ranking exercise was conducted at the Kickoff public meeting to get input from residents and rank natural hazards affecting the planning area. Participants ranked hazards in terms of level of risk, frequency of occurrence, and potential impact. Overall, residents ranked Hurricanes/Tropical Storms as the highest hazard risk followed by Floods, Drought, Windstorms, Extreme Heat, Lighting, Coastal Erosion, Tornado, Hailstorms, Expansive Soils, Dam/Levee Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, and Severe Winter Storms. The Planning Team Kickoff Workshop was well -attended, with members from each of the participating jurisdictions present. Efforts were made to document key participants. The following table highlights participants for each jurisdiction. For a comprehensive list of meeting attendees, meeting handouts, and documentation refer to Appendix D. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 4 1 P a Table 2-3. Kickoff Workshop Participation Summary Unincorporated Nueces County City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop �II, III I� �IIjji 11 Emergency Management Coordinator quudd„ 111111 p uG 11111'i1d1 °d0N�1j1P1 i 1 1111 III 111 Iildliiu1111111111111111 11 11111 ,111 1 111 l Ill lllp 1 1111111111m Office of Emergency Management I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information Mayor Office of Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information Mayor Office of Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 5 1 If" a Table 2-3. Kickoff Workshop Participation Summary (cont.) 1 1;1,11 i1 �! 111 D01101110 111'110 ( I1 (1'1'1111111'1'1r1' 1 HI , 1111111 1111 111111 ! I iV71llllllulll�'ulllll llllllll ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey City of Corpus Department of Access Information Christi Floodplain Manager Developmental ✓ Participated in Hazard Services Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information City of Driscoll Mayor Office of Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment City of Petronila City of Port Aransas ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information Mayor Office of the Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment Emergency Management Coordinator Office of Emergency Management ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 6 1 If" a Table 2-3. Kickoff Workshop Participation Summary (cont ) olil it 'Ill�lll ,, glnfio City of Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority Fire Chief, Emergency Management Coordinator Director of Port Security Fire Department Security �pQ I 1111111111111111111 ��� ���iill II III ��141111 IIIS � ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment KRISTV News Channel 6 in Corpus Christi, as well as the Corpus Christi Caller Times Newspaper also attended the Plan Kickoff Workshop. Public outreach efforts that resulted from the participation in the Plan Kickoff Workshop included: • Nueces County's Emergency Management Coordinator was interviewed by the Corpus Christi Caller Times and an article regarding the hazard mitigation project and the request for public input was published in the paper the next day. • Many of the participating jurisdictions posted a link to the public survey on their websites to solicit public input for the Plan. Hazard Identification Hazard identification and ranking was a major component of the Plan Kickoff Meeting. Following the Kickoff Meeting the Planning Team reviewed the public input received concerning the hazard ranking and formulated the final ranked list of natural hazards to be incorporated into the Plan. Hazards identification is documented in detail in Section 3 of this Plan. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 7 1 If" ,n G-318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop On February 14-15, 2017, the Texas Department of Emergency Management held a G- 318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Members from the participating jurisdiction and LAN attended the workshop. Risk Assessment A preliminary risk assessment for the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan was completed in March 2017 and the results were presented to Planning Team members via webinar on March 29, 2017. The resulting risk assessment profiled hazard events, provided information on previous occurrences, estimated probability of future events, and detailed the spatial extent and magnitude of impact on people and property. A hazard profile and vulnerability analysis for each of the natural hazards can be found in Sections 5 through 18 in this Plan. Mitigation Review and Development The mitigation strategy development for the Plan involved creating mitigation goals and new mitigation actions. Previous mitigation actions from the CBCOG regional plan were reviewed as a baseline for new actions, goals, and objectives. The Planning Team reviewed their respective mitigation actions from the previous plan to determine projects that are still viable and may be included in the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan. An inclusive and structured process was used to develop and prioritize mitigation actions for this Plan, including the following steps: 1. Potential mitigation actions were developed and the list narrowed down to those that were most likely to be implemented, most cost-effective in reducing risk, and most likely to receive political and community support. 2. A Problem Statement was developed for each hazard to determine actions to mitigate the specific problem or risk, background information on why the action is needed was documented as well as who (by title) will oversee implementation of the project. Timeframe for implementation was defined and any obstacles to implementation such as local environmental groups opposing the project or lack of community support was identified. 3. Participants were provided an inventory of federal and state funding sources that could potentially assist in implementing the proposed mitigation actions. Planning Team Members considered benefits that would result from the mitigation actions versus the cost of those projects. Economic impact of implementing one action over another was a consideration. 4. Planning Team Members identified and prioritized proposed actions, costs and benefits, effects on existing buildings and future development, implementation schedules, and potential funding sources. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 8 1 P ,n Table 2-4. Planning Team Meeting Attendance Summary 111111111 itr iuii�i 10"""L111 it IL1 II N1111uli1111V Meeting Date Unincorporated Nueces County City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop X X X X City of Corpus Christi X X X X City of Driscoll X X X X City of Petronila X X X X City of Port Aransas X X X X City of Robstown X X X X January 4, 2017 X X March 2, 2017 X X March 29, 2017 X X April 17, 2017 X X Port of Corpus X X X X Christi Authority X = Attended. Detailed attendance records are included in Appendix D. C = Did not attend. Resources and Existing Plans Resources A variety of resources were utilized in compiling the data needed to perform the hazard analysis. Resources included FEMA, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Texas A&M Forest Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the 2011 National Land Cover Database, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), the Texas Geographic Society, the Texas State Data Center, the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM), and local hazard event reports. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 9 1 If" ,n Review of the Nueces County Beach Management and Coastal Erosion Response Plan, Nueces County Coastal Parks Master Plan, Texas Coastwide Erosion Response Plan, Port of Corpus Christi USACE Dredging Report of 2015, Floodplain Management Plan, Storm Water Management Plan, and Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan provided essential data for developing actions to implement and incorporate into the mitigation plan. Incorporation of Existing Plans Current projects and studies were utilized as a starting point for discussing mitigation actions and how to incorporate the Plan into other local planning mechanisms such as budgetary, administrative, and development initiatives. Previous hazard events, occurrences, and hazard risk data were identified through NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), Texas Geographic Society, U.S. Geographic Society, U.S. Department of Agricultural, local reporting, and other sources. The preliminary results were presented at the Risk Assessment webinar in order to facilitate a discussion to help participants develop actions for their jurisdiction. Furthermore, these studies were used as a starting point for suggesting grant and mitigation activities based on local and FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) funding. Assessing Future Community Capabilities Local capability to implement identified mitigation actions can be challenging. Communities can benefit from Mutual Aid Agreements with their neighboring County. This increases their capability to undertake and implement mitigation actions. Executing future cooperative agreements with the County and neighboring jurisdictions to maximize budget and grant monies was discussed at the Mitigation Strategy workshop. Public and Stakeholder Involvement An important component of mitigation planning is public participation and stakeholder involvement. Input from individual citizens and the community as a whole provides the Planning Team with a greater understanding of local concerns and increases the likelihood of successfully implemented mitigation actions. If citizens and stakeholders are involved they are more likely to gain a greater appreciation of the hazards present in their community and take steps to reduce their impact. Neighboring communities as well as local and regional stakeholders were invited via email and phone and provided an overview of the planning process and how they may work with participating jurisdictions to apply for future project funding to implement mitigation projects relative to their specific hazard risks. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 10 1 P a Stakeholders The following groups represent a partial list of organizations invited to provide input into the Plan. ohII�n nnn lov IIIIIlD pr��°010o "fr°ni h " � 11 lo i Unincorporated Nueces County City of Corpus Christi City of Port Aransas Port of Corpus Christi Authority City of Robstown City of Bishop City of Driscoll City of Agua Dulce Table 2-5. Plan Stakeholders o 11111111 City of Petronila Nueces County Coastal Parks Department Nueces County Colonia Initiative Committee Nueces County School Superintendents Nueces County Oso Creek Committee Nueces County Drainage Districts 2 Nueces River Authority Nueces County Fire Chiefs Association Nueces County AgriLife Extension Emergency Management Coordinator Floodplain Manager, Interim Director of Development Services, Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Management Coordinator Director of Port Security, Public Safety Director Fire Chief/ Emergency Management Coordinator, Assistant Fire Chief Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor, City Secretary Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor, Administrative Consultant Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor, City Secretary Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor Parks Director Director Superintendent CCISD Deputy Executive Director Superintendent Deputy Director Director County Coordinator Public Participation Public involvement in the development of the plan included two public meetings prior to Plan approval and adoption. Public input was sought using three methods: open public Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 11 1 P a meetings; public survey; and the draft Plan was made available for public review on the Nueces County website, as well as other social media platforms. Reaching the segment of the public without access to computers or the Internet was a consideration in garnering public support. In addition to the copies of the draft Plan hosted on planning partner websites, planning partners held paper copies so citizens without internet access had an opportunity to review the plan. Assistance was provided by news coverage from the Corpus Christi Caller Times newspaper. Articles were developed for the local newspaper and posted to news websites. Public Meetings Notices and information regarding the project were also posted in the Corpus Christi Caller Times newspaper. Plan publicity was shared to social media platforms and community websites. Public Participation Survey In addition to the open public meetings, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan participants were able to solicit input from citizens and stakeholders through the use of a Public Survey. The survey was designed to obtain data and information from the residents of participating jurisdictions. Participating communities solicited surveys through their websites, social media, and utility bills. Copies of the survey were distributed by local officials and at public meetings. A total of 12 responses to the survey were completed which provided valuable input in the development of the Plan. A summary of the survey findings is provided in Appendix B. Public feedback assisted in driving the direction of hazard profiling, developing mitigation actions for areas of concern expressed in the survey, and allowed for the community to voice their concerns and involve those interested in the HMAP for the participating jurisdictions future involvement. Public feedback was also used in the cost -benefit analysis and prioritization of mitigation actions by factoring public opinion into the ranking criteria. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 12 1 P a 00 Ill Hazard Identification 1 Risk Assessment Overview 5 Hazard Identification The purpose of this section is to provide background information for the hazard identification process, as well as descriptions for the natural hazards identified. Upon a review of the full range of natural hazards suggested under FEMA planning guidance, the participating jurisdictions identified 14 hazards that are to be addressed in the Plan. These hazards were identified utilizing input from Planning Team members, and a review of the current State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan ("State Plan"). Readily available online information from reputable sources such as federal and state agencies was also evaluated to supplement information as needed. Based on this review, 14 hazards were identified as significant. IIU Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Table 3-1. Hazard Descriptions 1 Flood 2 11111111111111 11 111111111111111111 111 Hurricanes and tropical storms are intense tropical weather systems that produce damaging winds, generate storm surge, and heavy rainfall. A flood is the accumulation of water within a body of water, which results in the overflow of excess water onto adjacent lands, usually floodplains. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake or other watercourse susceptible to flooding. Flooding is the partial or complete inundation of otherwise normally dry land. Types of flooding include riverine, coastal, and shallow flooding. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 1 1P ,n III 111111111 111111 II II II HI 1111 OD 111 Table 4-1. Hazard Descript ons (Cont.) Drought 3 Windstorms II B l llillllll Droughts can be classified as meteoro og'ca , hydrolog'cal, agricultural, or socioeconomic droughts. A meteorolog cal drought is a reduction of precipitation from the expected average or typical precipitation patterns. A hydrologic drought occurs when below average rainfall impacts streams, lakes, reservoirs, and groundwater levels. Agricultural droughts are brought on by insufficient moisture in the soil, typically impacting crops. Socioeconomic droughts occur when water demand exceeds supply due to a precipitation -related supply shortfall. Droughts may initiate or exacerbate other hazards, such as extreme heat or wildfires. A windstorm is a storm with high winds or violent gusts with little or no rain. The windstorm hazard excludes extreme 4 wind events that occur with other wind -related natural hazards such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornados which are addressed elsewhere in this plan. Extreme Heat 5 Lightning 6 Coastal Erosion 7 1 Texas Natural Resources Code, Section 33.601 Extreme heat is the condition whereby temperatures hover ten degrees or more above the average high temperature in a region for an extended period. If extreme heat conditions persist, it may be considered a heat wave. Lightning is a sudden electrostatic discharge during an electrical storm between electrically charged regions of a cloud, between that cloud and another cloud, or between a cloud and the ground. Coastal erosion is the "loss of land, marshes, wetlands, beaches, or other coastal features within the coastal zone because of the actions of wind, waves, tides, storm surges, subsidence, or other forces"1. Coastal erosion may result in the temporary redistribution of coastal sediments, or the long-term loss of coastal sediments and sediment accumulation. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 2 1 If" ,n III 111111111 111111 II II II HI 1111 OD 111 Table 4-1. Hazard Descript ons (Cont.) Tornado II B l llillllll A tornado 's a violently rotating co umn of air extend ng between, and in contact with, a cloud and the surface of the 8 earth. Tornadoes have wind speeds of 250 miles per hour or more. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide and 50 miles long. Hailstorm 9 Expansive Soils 10 Dam Failure 11 2 NOAA Hail is a form of precipitation that occurs when updrafts in thunderstorms carry raindrops upward into extremely cold areas of the atmosphere where they freeze into ice. Nearly all severe thunderstorms produce hail aloft, though it may melt before reaching the ground. Multi -cell thunderstorms produce many hailstones, but not usually large hailstones. In the life cycle of the multi -cell thunderstorm, the mature stage is relatively short so there is not much time for growth of the hailstone. Supercell thunderstorms have sustained updrafts that support large hail formation by repeatedly lifting the hailstones into the very cold air at the top of the thunderstorm cloud. In general hail 2 inches (5 cm), a little larger than golf ball, or larger in diameter is associated with supercells. Non-supercell storms are capable of producing golf ball size hail. In all cases, the hail falls when the thunderstorm's updraft can no longer support the weight of the ice. The stronger the updraft the larger the hailstone can growl. Expansive soils contain minerals such as clay that are prone to large volume changes (swelling and shrinking). Soils with a high content of expansive minerals can shrink in drier seasons forming deep cracks. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging subsidence. A dam is a barrier that is constructed to hold back water. A dam failure is a systematic failure of a dam structure resulting in the uncontrolled release of water, often resulting in floods that could exceed the 100 -year flood plain boundaries. A levee is an embankment built to prevent overflow from a body of water. A levee failure is when a levee embankment fails, or is intentionally breached, causing the previously contained water to flood the land... Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 3 1 If" ,n 111 ! IIVW hl l llll 11 11 l hill Table 4-1. Hazard Descriptions (Cont. Dam Fa ure (cont. 11 Land Subsidence 12 Wildfire ...behind the levee. Land subsidence is the decrease in the lands surface elevation due to the loss of subsurface support. Land subsidence can be caused by both natural processes and manmade actions. Land subsidence caused by natural processes typically occurs over a long period of time, usually thousands to millions of years. Short-term land subsidence is generally the result of manmade actions such as: excessive ground -water withdrawal, oil and gas drilling, mining operations, collapse of buried infrastructure like pipelines for water, sewer and storm or the leakage of underground pipes that erode adjacent soils. Subsidence from groundwater withdrawal and oil and gas production usually occur over large areas, while subsidence from collapsed or leaking pipelines is generally localized. A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire almost exclusively fueled by natural vegetative fuels. Fuel may come in the form of grass, brush, or tress. Wildfire risk increases with high concentrations of connected fuels. Meteorological 13 conditions such as high temperatures, low humidity, droughts, and high wind can also increase wildfire risk. Humans are the most common source of initial ignition in wildfires. Sparks from agricultural, industrial, or automobile activity may start a wildfire. Severe Winter Storms 14 3 State of Texas Mitigation Plan Update 2013 A severe winter storm event is defined as a storm with snow, ice, or freezing rain. Severe winter storms are rare for the Texas Coastal area. Sever winter storms may include snowstorms, blizzards, cold waves and ice storms. Snowstorms include four or more inches of snow in a 12 - hour period. Blizzards are characterized by low temperatures and strong winds in excess of 35 mph with large amounts of drifting snow. A cold wave is a winter cold front with a drastic drop in temperature. An ice storm occurs when rain falls out of the warm and moist upper layers of the atmosphere into a cold and dry layer near the ground.3 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 4 1 IP a S Risk Assessment Overview The risk assessment includes seven general parameters that are described for each hazard; description, location, extent, occurrence, probability, impact, and vulnerability. Frequency of return, or probability, was calculated by dividing the number of events in the recorded time period for each hazard by the overall time period that the resource database recorded events. Applicable hazard profiles include a description of a general vulnerability assessment. Vulnerability is the total of assets that are subject to damages from a hazard (based on historic recorded damages). Assets in the region were inventoried and defined in hazard zones where appropriate. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 5 1 P a 1.111111. 1111111 otf1f1r�f fmumm mu ff imhim�i ' 11% rrietnt Vulnerable Assets Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Existing Assets 3 City of Agua Dulce Existing Assets 4 City of Bishop Existing Assets 5 City of Corpus Christi Existing Assets 6 City of Driscoll Existing Assets 7 City of Petronila Existing Assets 8 City of Port Aransas Existing Assets 9 City of Robstown Existing Assets 10 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Existing Assets 11 Vulnerable Future Assets 12 Special Population Considerations 12 Vulnerable Assets Overview Vulnerable assets are those that are susceptible to damage and loss from hazard events. A community's vulnerability to a natural hazard is measured as a function of that community's existing and future vulnerable assets including, but not limited to, populations, critical and non-critical infrastructure, property, and systems. Quantifying existing assets is the first step in defining a community's vulnerability to natural hazards. Existing assets are defined below for the county and participating jurisdictions. The City of Corpus Christi is the county seat and the largest city in the county. Populations for the unincorporated county and participating jurisdictions are included in the Existing Asset sections below. A description of the county land cover is shown in Table 4-1. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 1 1 If" ,n Table 4-1 — Nueces County Land Cover' \ 1\Q11111 111111111111111 10\\\11111111 \ 1\11111. (1111 \\II 11 � 1 1 1 �m 0 � �� An t�� �¢ , , Residential 2.86% Commercial and Industrial 8.98% Agricultural 47.21% Forested, Shrub, and Grassland 7.88% Wetlands 4.09% Unknown and Barren 2.06% Water 26.97% Critical Facilities For the purpose of hazard mitigation, FEMA defines critical facilities as hospitals, fire stations, police stations, courthouse, communications, and similar facilities where essential programs/services are provided. Other facilities such as public schools may be deemed by a community to be a critical facility as well. These facilities should be given special consideration when formulating regulatory alternatives and floodplain management plans. A critical facility should not be located in a floodplain if at all possible. If located in a floodplain it should be provided a higher level of protection so that it can continue to function and provide services during and after a flood. Hazard mitigation actions to mitigate risk to critical facilities located in the 100 -year floodplain, or potentially impacted by future flood conditions, are included in this Plan by jurisdiction. Critical Facilities are tabulated in Appendix D of the Plan. 1 Homer, C.G., Dewitz, J.A., Yang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Xian, G., Coulston, J., Herold, N.D., Wickham, J.D., and Megown, K., 2015, Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States - Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 81, no. 5, p. 345-354 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 2 1 IP ,n S Unincorporated Nueces County Existing Assets SSSSSS\\\alnttaSS\S.. 15,274 (Unincorporated) *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] Unincorporated Nueces County figure represents the balance of the total population in the county, less each individual jurisdiction participating in the plan. sssssmmarmrzzaanmsss. sassErmassa assauttnalms Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 132.85 Miles 84.29 Miles 312,734.7 Acres; $76,735,126 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 masssttztaatsslssm .��mu,� an ,, u..11``1111111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� 1 � �1111011111\100100 111\ 0\ 1lunta01\(11 111110\������`�,�,���1��11,��0����1���\����,1���,1��,1,�,,�,��',��,�,1�1�,��,,�����111�,�����1�,11��,�1„�\0��� ittnemmmn����1�1,�,��1��1,1�1�11��\�„����� 8210 $406,888,603 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll 4,202 $487,429,634 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 3 1 If” a City of Agua Dulce Existing Assets lantarartnanall 820 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSSZZZMEMMEn\SSSS SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 1.15 Miles Rail Crop Land* 0 Miles 2.45 Acres; $602 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x r1� nmwImrmzwinialmeamaretm111 11011\�00100 \ 0\ �1111 1\\1\(11 11 1 111������1`�,�,�1�\��1\,��0����1���\����,\��1,1,��,�,1�\1,��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��,�11�\0�\��„1,�,;1,��1�����1��,��\�,��1�1�1,��,�„`�„�1�1,�\���1�\1,`\�����1�1„�,��1��„1� 221 $17,541,361 259 $20,771,243 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 4 1 If” a City of Bishop Existing Assets SISMSSZ nanall 3,150 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSS 11111111MMEntan. SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 2.9 Miles Rail Crop Land* 2.5 Miles 539.02 Acres; $132,258 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) sstsssmazrotzotaarrltrastsas\m\\. ��������� � m m m . �� mu �� � � � � � 11``11 ntl\111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������1\01\1\\�1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\1�\1�1\11\1\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 1 � �1111011111\� 00100111\ 0� �warm Ituremann\11�(11 1111101\�����1`�,�,�1�\��1\,��0����1���\����,\��1\\��,,�,,�,���,��,�\\�,1\��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��\�11�\0�\� ����1�1„�,��1��\,1�\�\�1�1\,����1 466 $115,889,915 1,162 $99,373,071 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 5 1 If” a City of Corpus Christi Existing Assets SSSS\SrartnaaSS\ 324,074 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSSZZZMEMMEn\SSSS SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 381.6 Miles Rail Crop Land* 50.06 Miles 24,632.44 Acres; $6,044,014.65 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x 1 1� � � 10 11 0 1 WEVIS 00100 111\ 0\� 111111 1\\1\1 1111 1 11101�\����,\��1,1��,1,�,,�,���,��,�,1�\1,��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��,�11�\0�\� 11111111�\��1��,��\�,��1�1�1,��,�„`�„�1�1,�\���1�\1,`\�����1�1„�,��1��„1�,�\�1\1„����1 28,382 $7,148,005,369 82,947 $10,238,656,508 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 6 1 If” a City of Driscoll Existing Assets SISMSSZ nanall 752 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSS 11111111MMEntan. SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 2.96 Miles Rail Crop Land* 1.41 Miles 464.67 Acres; $114,014.81 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x r1� nmwImrmzwinialmeamaretm111 11011\�00100 \ 0\ �1111 1\\1\(11 11 1 111������1`�,�,�1�\��1\,��0����1���\����,\��1,1,��,�,1�\1,��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��,�11�\0�\��„1,�,;1,��1�����1��,��\�,��1�1�1,��,�„`�„�1�1,�\���1�\1,`\�����1�1„�,��1��„1� 272 $25,502,273 221 $13,255,055 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 7 1 If” a City of Petronila Existing Assets SSSS\SrartnaaSS\ 114 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSSZZMttMtMn\SSSS. SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 132.85 Miles 84.29 Miles 926.66 Acres; $227,373.01 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x 111 10 11 01 0 1 11\� 00100 111 \ 0\ � 11\� 111111 1 \\1\ (1 1 1 11 (1 1 1 1 11 � 0 114 $3,714,796 38 $3,201,138 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 8 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Existing Assets SISMSSZ nanall 3,955 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSS 111 M n\SSSS SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 9.58 Miles Rail 0 Miles Crop Land* 0 Acres; $0 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 m111111stettaltalsax‘x m .��mu,� an ,, u..��� � 11``11X11111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� 1 � �1111011111\100100 111\ 0\ 1zeta ttnrmmtnn01\(11 111110\������`�,�,���1��11,��0����1���\����,1���,1��,1,�,,�,��',��,�,1�1�,��,,�����111�,�����1�,11��,�1„�\0��� ����1�1,�,��1��1,1�1�11��\�„����� 6,621 $414,531,219 2,768 $774,547,552 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 9 1 If” a City of Robstown Existing Assets SSSSSSZ El 11,576 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] SttISSMMIMZMIMMSSSS SSSSSIMISSSSSI SSSSWIIZISSSS% Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 42.80 Miles 12.46 Miles 6,580.37 Acres; $1,614,612.05 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 mISSISTIMMESSIS%\% m .�� mu ,� an ,, u..��� � 11``11X11111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� � �111 0 11\100100 111 \ 0\ 1ymtn1 (11 1 11 11 0\������`�,�,���1��11,��0����1����1�,��1,��,�1�11��\�„����� 2,118 $151,390,423 3,188 $183,445,540 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 10 1 If” a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Existing Assets N/A SSISSSS\\MIMMIEMMISSS IISSSSSIZMSSSSMIISSSVIIIIISISMS Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 10.4 Miles 27.4 Miles 0 Acres; $0 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 misassitztamasasm .�� mu,� an ,, u..��� � 11``11X11111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� 111 10 11 01 0 1 11\1 00100 111 \ 0\ 1 11\1 111111 1 01\ (1 1 1 11 (1 1 1 1 11 � 0 �`,,��1�1,�����1�� 245 $174,026,681 0 $0 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 11 1 If" a Vulnerable Future Assets Future growth and development in the county may affect hazard vulnerability. For identification of a community's future assets, it is useful to consider anticipated population growth, development trends, and planning and development management efforts. Based on population projections for the county planning area provided by the Texas State Data Center, the county, overall, is expected to grow approximately 1`)/0 annually from 2015 to 2040. Nueces County experiences steady growth in development including services to support the tourism industry, oil and gas industry, port activity, and agricultural land. Future assets is another important matrix to access a jurisdiction's vulnerability to natural hazards. With development comes the need to address the risk of natural hazards for larger populations and increased numbers of non-critical and critical facilities. Historically, hurricanes, tropical storms, and flooding has been a widespread problem for the Plan area; potential for these hazards creates limitations for urban land uses. A goal of community officials in the Plan area is to develop strategies to ensure that future development has reduced risk of impact by natural hazards while not inhibiting community growth. Vulnerability including potential dollar losses is defined for each hazard by jurisdiction in Sections 5 through Section 18 of this Plan. Special Population Considerations While the Port of Corpus Christi Authority lacks a resident, Census -recognized population, there is a significant working population that would be impacted by any natural hazards affecting the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. According to a 2015 study,2 the Port of Corpus Christi generated 13,770 direct jobs. Many of these 13,770 employees would be expected to be located on PCCA property for significant periods of time. Some of the jurisdictions in the plan are tourist destinations. The Cities of Corpus Christi and Port Aransas have significant seasonal tourist populations. These non -permanent populations may be more hazard -vulnerable than resident populations. Unlike residents, tourists are not as familiar with the community and its hazards and may not know how the appropriate measures to take to protect themselves from natural hazards. 2 http://portofcc.com/wp-content/uploads/CorpusChristi2016_FINAL-1.pdf Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 12 1 P a 111.111.1.1. 1111,111- 1 )111111111111,111110 ,11111,1111 11111111110 �ii11111 1111 iii Illi��rJlllllllrralllllllllllll111111 �l��1111111111111111111 11111""""111 I���llllllllllllll 11111111111 �I •,1„,1•„•„•„•„•,.1•„•„•„,„•„•„•„•,.„1„.„.„1„.„.„,"•,,, jUl1i�ll 11111111 1111111 Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Hazard 7 City of Bishop Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Hazard 14 City of Petronila Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hazard 18 City of Robstown Hazard 20 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hazard 22 Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard Overview Description Hurricanes and tropical storms are intense tropical weather systems that produce damaging winds, generate storm surge, and heavy rainfall. Location Hurricanes and tropical storms do not have a specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to hurricane and tropical storm activity. According to FEMA Wind Zones in the United States, the entirety of Nueces County is identified as a Hurricane -Susceptible Region and is located in Wind Zone III, associated to winds as high as 200 mph. The effects of a hurricane can be felt as far as 150 miles from the center of the storm. The most damaging effects of a storm, both in terms of wind damage and storm surge, are likely to be felt within the radius of maximum wind (RMW). The average RMW of Atlantic hurricanes has been observed to be about 30 miles1. A 30 mile buffer applied to the storms that have occurred in the planning area encompasses the entire planning area. Consequently, the entire planning area should be considered at risk of hurricane or tropical storm damage. 1 Source: A Note on the Radius of Maximum Wind for Hurricanes, S.A. Hsu and Zhondge Yan, 1998 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 1 111 ,n Z Figure 5-1. FEMA Wind Zones in the United States /*I ,Nntoomr, fl4,09%*61. fP4,6,fof 6.9,10 J.1 * ,,,m44•••-•1; ALA,SiXiik rsf• ir"tff, .:••••• <041 .1 1' • „ 11 1117111i7 (444 ( WIND ZONES IN IKE UNITED SUNS* •• 111., 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN, !: 1111111111111,1111111111, 111111111111111111111, .„.11111 !""111. ,:111...1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1111 ---.11:111:111111111111:111111,1111,11.1.111,11.„.!!!! '1'".11101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"1"1, 011,11111',1111:1,::::::111,111° 1,111111111111111111111111111111 ,,,[41111111111 000111111111111111111,111111.11:1!1.:1!1.1.11.11.11.1111111111111111111111111.11.,1111,1111..11..111,111..11,1111,'1.11111.1111,11:111.1,11.1.1,'111.1.1111.'11111ill'1111. .11'11.111.1111:11'1111'1'1111'11'1111111111111111111111'111:1'111111.11111111.11111.11111111.1111.11111.11.'11.111111.1.1111.11'11i11,111111111111111111,11111111111111111111111111111111'111111H1111111111111101111111111,11111111111..,1i1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,' 101..,',",111,!:11::;',111,11111111,11:JIV,11,1111101.11filiflooloppini 101100 11,11111111,1111,111,1,11111,1,111,11.1,1111111111111111111111,1,111,11,11,11,11ki,.....,!...:40„..!,....,..„„;„.„.„ 1...1.111t1.11,11.1.11111.11.1\11.111111.111111.11.11.11.11.11.11.011:1.11:11:11:1.'1:1011:11:111,„..1 111 11 11 ""1"11"1"",11,11,1111,111111111111111111111111"11111111111'r,iploc!,!,1,1,1,1,111. [117:7 Wehify ridalreid y4i 111:1,111,11111,,,,111„11 111 HMIAMO 'VONNOVoror, UTINFR )P3 N4 toe Asoof 100„ov4 molow 04„orr•ociwo 3u0,06000 Room' ' Clogofr woo ;vow puommovwrohm.4 affo coromma wow, As6CE (,•#441 NUECES - 3s-mmod 9,,No too *woo woo,*r COUNTY ficheogow, 111,4. 4INIDZOOrtES zoom • 210N1 " • ••••0',.."'"' Me toot ZONE N Mk AI" 1111111111111111111111 11 The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) was established under the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) by the Texas Legislature in 1971 following Hurricane Celia. TWIA provides windstorm and hail insurance along the Texas seacoast. Recommended design and inspection requirements for structures along the coast have been developed by TDI based on historical damages. Three designated catastrophe areas have been defined for Nueces County. Designated catastrophe areas are established for territories subject to unusually frequent and severe damage resulting from windstorm or hailstorms. Designated catastrophe areas for Nueces County include: Seaward, Inland I, and Inland II. Adopted design wind speeds for these designated catastrophe areas are shown in Figure 8-2 and defined below: • Seaward: 130 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland I: 120 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland II: 110 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 2 1 IP a g e Figure 5-2 TDI Designated Catastrophe Areas • Corpus Christi 1101vvvvvvoll \�\ Extent Inland II Inland I Seaward Hurricane intensity is categorized by the Saffir-Simpson Scale, ranked 1 — 5, in order of lowest to highest wind speed. This scale, while it is based on a limited suite of characteristics of hurricane intensity, provides an informative framework with which hurricanes can be discussed. Category 3, 4, and 5 storms are considered to be the most dangerous hurricanes. There is a significant potential for property damage and loss of life associated with Category 3 -5 storms. Only 20% of the total tropical hurricane landfalls are from Category 3-5 storms, yet Category 3-5 storms have caused 70% of the hurricane -related damage in the United States. Category 1 and 2 storms, while generally not as dangerous as Category 3-5 storms, still require consideration and preparation. For example, Hurricane Ike was a Category 2 storm, yet was the third most destructive hurricane to make landfall in the United States. Table 5-1 describes Saffir-Simpson Scale hurricane categories and associated storm surge estimates. Historically strong Category 3 storms have occurred throughout the planning area. Given the planning area's coastal location, the participating jurisdictions could potentially experience a Category 5 storm in the future. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 3 1 P a Table 5-1. Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale2 111111 lllll 1 2 3 4 5 »0II0000000I,,JlII1llllIlI0IIII I,000 !IIlll1i.0II1.;1!1u0°IIIbtiItiItiIti�u0I uIIlIlIl�l,,,lsssslll:0���yy��i0.:ti01ssti»III1«IIIII' 10;�V»Iplll11�i««lllsl`o"Il0,���ll0iu��0l,,,,,,,,01 uuiluuu 11ttttttttttuum11, IIII IIII 111�111II 74-95 96-110 111-129 130-155 157+ Occurrences The typical Atlantic hurricane season runs from June to October. While the majority of storms occur within this range, storms have occurred outside of this window. Between 1842 and 2016, a total of 14 unique storms crossed the planning area. A detailed breakdown of storms by intensity and jurisdiction is presented in Table 5-2. No Category 4 or Category 5 Hurricanes crossed the planning area during this time. ww��I IIS 0u.111,0iu 1),0iu00uugllPViilpiiqi ulpIllllIIIIl0 P„ I III�IIII Jurisdiction Nueces County 14 7 Probability The annual probability and reoccurrence intervals of tropical storms and hurricanes is presented in Table 5-3. Probability and reoccurrence intervals are calculated by dividing the number of events by the observation period. It should be noted that these probabilities reflect the previous occurrence of the center of a storm tracking over a jurisdiction. In actuality, due to the size of these storms, the impacts would be felt across the planning area. Table 5-2. Historical Occurrences3 UI , 000,00,0„o„,„ 0010 HMO 1 i011nIhD IIII�uti" V,� Puu0� 00i0,�Nu� 111n'71I lII Il0jlu�ll101lll 11 ln'101;'01010l IIII 111°°00011°01111°111"IPI1i Total Tropical Storms & Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Storms Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 2 3 2 Landsea, C.W., Pielke, R.A. Jr., Mestas-Nunez, A.M., Knaff, J.A. (1999) Atlantic Basin Hurricanes: Indices of Climatic Changes. Climactic Change, 42:89-129. 3N 0AA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 4 1 li" ,n Jurisdiction Nueces County 8% 4% Impact Nueces County is a coastal county; the entire planning area will be vulnerable to the impacts of wind brought on my hurricanes and tropical storms. While all jurisdictions are impacted by hurricanes and tropical storms, the impacts felt by each jurisdiction may vary depending upon the characteristics of a particular storm. Storm surge travels with the storm and may make landfall ahead of the center of the storm. Storm surge can cause severe flooding in coastal areas; impacting the jurisdictions along the coast. Additionally, hurricanes and tropical storms produce large amounts of rain. This rain can overwhelm drainage systems. Even hurricanes or tropical storms that have weakened after making landfall can continue to drop significant quantities of water. This water can lead to flooding. The impacts to communities from a category 5 storms could be near complete destruction of any and all assets. Houses and commercial property could be destroyed. In addition to the destruction of property, populations can be displaced if their homes are destroyed. Power and other utilities can be interrupted, even by lower category storms. Crops can be severely damaged, resulting in economic impacts. Table 5-3. Reoccurrence Probability uuull���lllldi�}l}}}}}i11III1 ,,111 1I i" IIIII11ollu I' iii iiooiii ooiii ulll� u�iiu���lllllliii�uulh11ll l ' u11111.1 '1'1'1'1'1'1'1'11'1 iuii«uuliIIII�''"�`I`"'� '�pl1munlll������IIIII1Im��u�uIII111 111 Future Trop -cal Storms Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Storms & Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 1.1% 1.7% Vulnerability Due to Nueces County being located on the Texas coast and the size and power of hurricanes and tropical storms, particularly category 4 and 5 storms, all assets within the participating jurisdictions are vulnerable to potential damage by hurricanes and tropical storms. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 5 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\tllta\S\SSSIII.IM\\\\\\\... ssswmntsssl ssztattErransi County Wide (Unincorporated) Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 Total Storms 12 SSISSISIAISSSSM Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 7 1 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 2 ssstssz=tnss\s Future Storms 6.9% Tropical Storms & Depressions 4% Category 1 Hurricanes 0.6% Category 2 Hurricanes Category 3 Hurricanes 1.2% 1.2% slasssminuttnsal lastamtnas lastrtianan lastaxannals 8210 SISTEMEMSal 423,946.09 $487,429,634 tS�F�YT tif7�Y $406,888,603 ISISSIMISSIS1 Mat 2111nal 84.29 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 6 1 If" a 1 "Mil 01 Figure 5-3. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for Unincorporated Nueces County (1842 — 2016) 1.1'I11i1:114111111111111 H. 44 MIN ft 1 dill '111117 " oloyoh0 0000000000 0000000111111 11111111111111111111111111 a,m„Iw"11111111111111111111 IVV1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 41111pi WfW �mkrI0il9dl�l'tiwY1l0o.°lo, i!'��I�AI�M�K;IqTuwOl� h ul1!i"f;Gl , llllPolI.IIlII�l V IVIIuIIII�, IIII1111111u0 l 01 10 rtItt ru "ipp4 ry Ivvvvro ii�'�i ;ui 116 1141111111 1111111M 011 .0,10001000000000000 ,00,000,00, 0000000 u" ! d d!"t01rw�" 1 �Illul 0110000100000 ...,000 0000 111 FSI ,1111 .111111111111111111111111111111111 VNII' Ju Ilp/u IY i, E r itiv,40 mod i01011 I IH,azard m n9,000,40 A,Oon P +n'-0wtit,,4 140.voon.Con01.y #,Its car•ve% rropmc,;ty0 Storms Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 7 1 P ,n d' mv' City of Agua Dulce Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\tlltta\S\SSIII.IM\\\\\\\ssswmntsssl ssztarznyansi City Wide Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 0 ISSISSI1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 0 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 0% SSSSSMllalltnS\SS\ Tropical Storms & Depressions Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 820 xsalntrn\SS\ 221 SSIVE2111SISS' 218.3 Category 3 Hurricanes 1 1 0 ���"��\�11�\��1�1�\l1\\1 \111\11\O\\11\\1�` $ 20, , 711 243 liztr 1 $17,541,361 MSS AIMS saw tartassal Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 8 1 If" a Figure 5-4. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Agua Dulce (1842 — 2016) f i'N%4// o,, „� ,...�, ,, ��r%/; t nnS�yn )/iNaG/., �� ,.. ,, �➢,.: r 6 /, ���1<>i� � ;.,. :�, l h!J,..: '�, ,, � hr„,,..�,'/�. '� ,./ ��lfw.'r,w/,,,r�r'r , „/a.:%1l�✓1 /'/'' � ///'� rr � 1 / , /c J/1ff J-�a;,�,//i-lii,�I/r1%��;'//�r,� 1�/j j✓%,O,G,I,,f.y''��f�,/rr/,,i,rl,-�,/,,r/,qr�/n����//�ofi�r�%„m��lp*:i:,..o�//o/�//^nrr!' �l,.7���/�l�fJ�fl�/�!��,:J/�/i o/ris`�ri�1Jr�p.rn INDIANA; "01011/1 IN/IGuI �/�//// Il� Gl)f�11' i.. / r i� I f ���',r�;='-% r lwu w/J fIF/ //;;✓ ;,l r, �i;i W ,,. ';� �I ;i, , f I� /�Ur%, (uJ'���'(�///�// r r �rrr�u rl �� od�� r w, ! , rr wI rw 9 r rwJ, ' Nueces County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 5 9 If" a g e City of Bishop Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSdim.\t 11 City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 Mt a SU Total Storms 1 ISISSIS 1 SSSSM Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 ssss\ss=ttssss Future Storms 0.6% Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% ISSISSIV M SSIMMIDASSS MSC ti MISS% ISIVITEMIASS 466 ISS1I t S 4 MSS! r 111 ISSN 2.9 Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes Category 3 Hurricanes SIMI" MN MIMI 423,946.09 tre • r $99,373,071 IV YT rirY211k $115,889,915 MIMI 1 MIME ,N 2.5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 10 1 If" a Figure 5-5. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Bishop (1842 — 2016) 11000001111111101011j11 1 111 iimll 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000100011 1111 1,"'uIIPI luuoli (I�I�IIIIIIIIII 1„001„10.100001001.1.111010000000100000110000101111111111'111 A1y11A uuuuuuulllll II111 101 10 1111111111111111 1111 1111111111 e w 100,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11i (11� 1111I � 11!III1 H 1111 Ilii Ii 1! 1°l jl�fop4i 1 i' { �Jil' ull0u 11'11111111: 111111111111111111111111111111111111111.!it.I'l 111 1111" 111 1,111111111 111IIIl'ly I 1 1�a9aIP 11lll III11ll!,il1a li poljjiii11111'lllIIII11IIlll 'II' lulllll III 1111 �'1i 111}i1vy11I 1111„u1,i'1,11111ll1 Ii Ii 1�11 11' I,f , 11 Ili �1 p 1111111, ni I 111111 �I! �itll 11.110 lI(I it ll �m111111111111 muuuuly 1.11.11.111l111.111.11.11,1 .. '1111111111111111111 1111')1 111111111111111111110,010,010,0100 .,111;111,11;111;111;, 111111111111111i1llpl'ilii. 11111111111111111011111 ®n 11111111 11111111111111111.11,111 III �ll��� 111111 11 mN 111 dn1,014 ,Alun#44;*no4+, 1.111.4,oel "olto:lri A4tooa I01,31a'e�, weiwmn Iwl„wataa s a p„,raRr 44.:Amcanc. 45, �Y�UI MM'"�Wa yrAYAllXlrl:uuoirwn. wrvuww,, �ouiy,w, u 111111111111111111111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 11 1 P City of Corpus Christi Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSdim.S\t slaw m nassi ssz tat :Err nal City Wide Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 11 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 4 2 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 3 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 6.3% Tropical Storms & Depressions 2.3% Category 1 Hurricanes 1.2% Category 2 Hurricanes Category 3 Hurricanes 1.2% 1.7% sssssssxzm=Ass assininsal samminsta satuninss 28,382 ISS11211111111WSIMI: r ranSI 381.6 ssuratmasu 322,267.1 ntmau $10,238,897,626 tS�F�YT tif7�Y $7,148,763,878 MUPam ISMS 50.06 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 12 1 If" a Figure 5-6. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Corpus Christi (1842 — 2016) Y �Y�. illl pM ..1,1,1,11,1,1)))111111111111111 1y7 l1.11111111.1111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.1111111111.11111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11,7,...„„„„„„, ii purtyl;; !I els w°Vi I !! 1111111111111111111111111111111111uuuuurs �iR�i!flMuu � 11111111111111111 IIS ao��� MIO �IVII u+l`! an^a141Ve 1111111111 Ii1141N�(�i'" **OA 0,4140f Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 13 1 P ,n d' e City of Driscoll Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\t ISSISSIII \\MIX\ slaw m nassi ssz tat :Err nal City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 0 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 0 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 0% SSSSSMllalltnS\SS\ Tropical Storms & Depressions Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 752 InISSxsal 11 =MS% 272 ISS1121211111111SIMI: r r MSS% 2.96 744.7 Category 3 Hurricanes 1 1 0 ���"��\�11�\��1�1�\l1\\1 \111\11\Oun $13, , 255055 liztr 1 $25,502,273 ta inn= 1.41 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 14 1 If" a Figure 5-7. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Driscoll (1842 — 2016) 1101 10001,110101 11°1°11111°!°11:°111:i°1°11.111' :(111111111111.111011111111111111100000100 001 000010181010 m0 00;1111,111111111111111111 � �i 1 11111I OO>1 ' �� �11iIIIRTIIRr�((r?III,, IL �IIIIIIIII�III1'l� 0 0111111111111111111110 001000000000000 000 111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 1111111111111111 11 1111111111111111111 111111111111111111 11 001110000000000000000 000000 01 010010 1001 1011111111111111111100000000011 01111111111111111111 110 0011111 °11011 1011011110110110°010000011010111,111111 1111 010101011 '111110 1111 '1111 1'1'1'1'1'1' q'III 8981,100 illll'1 I1� 1111111111 111111111100111 010001 1111111111111111111111111 1114 101000,10101111111111110100010 1111011111{11111111111.1.0, 11 Iii10011„1,01, 00,11000 1111111111111111 N"0011100000100'"""°:10 01101001 MMN11110101010100000000 11 11111 00111111110011111111111m11111111111111111 11111111111 1 010000,101 ,004400,40,0, 0400000090000000,00000 "PaM 4".. W,r.1011510.� Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 15 1 P a City of Petronila Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\tlltta\S\SSIII.IM\\\\\\\ssswmntsssl ssztattErransi City Wide Inland 1 ISTECIASI Total Storms 3 ISSISSI1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 1.7% Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 1.2% SSSSSSMVCZM=n\SS SSICIZZIZASSS 114 xsalntrn\SS\ 114 ISS1121211111111SIMI: In MSS% 1167.61 Category 3 Hurricanes lcumnamtmau $3,201,138 liat mirtau $3,714,796 tailISSI 84.29 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 16 1 If" a Figure 5-8. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Petronila (1842 — 2016) i111111��W 11101rI Nllid 11' [01,0 0,00111,0101, Irl �IIII�gI11111111111P11111'1P��!N�� 1 111111111 1111111111111111111111 IiliII1 IIII 1jI1111111111111111 1'.1" 1I11II IIIII III IIIIIIIIIIII1111111111jii1111 1111' od 111111111 111111111110 III00lullllllllluul 100! 111110111 VVI WW 11111111111111111111111, 1 to 110 lo 111111111111111 W1111IIIIII110IIIIIIL II III ulul 1 Utt 11111111111111 111111111111111 II p 111111111111111111111111111 1111 0h111111 j, oo0100000000000000 1110011111111111111111111 1 ' 00011111111111 11111111111111111,111 0111 00000000000000000000000. 0110•10•10•1•00:00"0"00.• i 0000 01 00,00,00,000000 j'11111111111110111111111.11 I 11: I��'11ol, 11,1 011010111,1110110011110" 11SN051(PI m°II11111111111 �WW111 1 dl , OuniiYliiARpYkp1(i'! 41,601111l1101117d. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 111110000000000000111 110+ ,,:00,,10 11.1111 111111111100 lL:Cillk 11111111111111111111111111 1 ii 11 • 111111 1)III11N110111)111 NIP10V:.!U'• 11WWW1,11 1 00 111111 10 100 0,00,001111011111111,11,11000001,1110 0100100400 dr: 000 ul111111111 111111 1!11111111 1 III 111111111111111111 11111111111111111VI1111 11111V 01�1111111111111111111111�11111 (i00 1ml 110 W11u1� 1010,r000000„0I1llhlo Iu 10111 0000ll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101 h0uWll11ll IIIIII 11111 01I0I11I 0 muuul �l111111110000o1111iloou000mool000l000l0000uuu0011011111111111111111111111111111111111111 puu 111111111111 1 11111111 101 1111 1 011111001:0100,00010111111011111 llllllll1 IWWIWWVWIWWINooIWWIWWIWWWIVIooWIWWIVI� 0o j j,401 �010000 IIIII 1WW11111d 101100000 1111111111 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11„111111111111111111p111111111111111111111111111111111 11jInuH I�11 u1111111111uu1111 I 1 aU: IIII V1111,1111)))))))))),o1))))))))))))),o1,11omV V 111 ill ,a'„'l1 4 )01, o 11,„,111” :far” 14 h 111111111,1\1,1111:1;1 ;dna„ r 14 111111111111111111111111 10,0111101 0111011010101011011111 0110111111111111111111 III,11111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 100 0rwilii� l,l{ VI o1111111111111110111111„01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 17 1 IIP ,n 100000 City of Port Aransas Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\t ISSISSIII \\MIX\ slaw m nassi ssz tat :Err nal City Wide Seaward and Inland 1 ISTECIASI Total Storms 3 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 2 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 1 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms Tropical Storms & Depressions 1.7% 1.2% SSSSSSIIV 3,955 lastrnanasssalummulas 6621 ISS1121211111111SIMI: r r MSS% 9.58 Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 9004.91 Category 3 Hurricanes 0.6% 1 1 0 `���"��\�11�\11\l1\\1 \111\11\O\\11\\1�` $774, , 306434 liarr 1 $413,772,710 lsastnlsnu saw tartassiu 0.00 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 18 1 If" a Figure 5-9. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Port Aransas (1842 — 2016) 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111000 11111 aataaa Humana a, , t Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 19 1 P a City of Robstown Hurricane and Tropical Storm Hazard SISISSI11111SSISSI\‘‘‘‘M\\\\\\\ slaw m nassi ssz mitt r au City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 1 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% 0.6% SSSSSSIIV 76 sstttrnansa sattermals 2118 ISS1121211111111SIMI: r r MSS% 42.80 Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 9921.51 Category 3 Hurricanes 1 1 0 `���"��\�11�\11\l1\\1 \111\11\O\\11\\1�` $183,445,540 1 1 $151,390,423 MU 1 ISMS 12.46 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 20 1 If" a Figure 5-10. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Robstown (1842 — 2016) 11110 11111111 pHHHHi 41, IIIH1111111111111 II VW��� iiu1I9V 1111Yuuuw IVvr IpitIIMII uiYl���(i(h'lll iM °N rAlt' Nll Hi rI . iury I/t Ifl 11111111111111111 i Ildllllll1111111i HHHHHj9Y1! „ijuul all9. �� IIIIII 'i 1Ygillvi0000000lu Valla pu,a 1 'III ,uur'rvl,; 1 iu4b...HAII a'AHiiu3dl;:;w1411 wit4PYin o HlHlllr'HIHH40HHH, 'UHH40'A„,;,s; Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 21 1 P ,n d', m' Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hazard S SS\S11 Insts "iii Ism ma ..al Jurisdiction Wide Inland 1 1St 111=111 Total Storms 6 ISSSS%% 1 ISSISSM Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 2 S\SSSSSS\M\\1=MSSS Future Storms 3.5% Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% Category 1 Hurricanes 1.2 % Category 2 Hurricanes 0.6% Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 1 2 Category 3 Hurricanes 1.2% ISSISSSW 12E:111 n\SSS\ InatninSa Unknown 1.1 Sat% ISSMECIASS\ 245 111111521111111Mat • r nal% 0.8 7,867 0 IIMASAIMpill”111,1SI t '""" ISSITEIESSISI 27.4 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 22 1 If" a Figure 5-11. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for Port of Corpus Christi Authority (1842 — 2016) aylyuli c 111111111111111111111111 til dSr 1 �Yr;cii ,rMl 101 Ik 111111,111111111111111,1111111111111,11,111,11,111111111 11111111111111111,111,1,1,11,1,1,11111 .....1111..: 0. 00 011000 40000 1;01 rhoo :aohr,m :u' ;,t.: r Jel• Ptiwo V W k`I Conlky 111111 1111111111st... 1111, 11111111111111,111 04.4411i410 • 01000000. IMI010000 '0,00000,00,111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 23 1 P ,n d', m' W ��f VMS 1111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11111111Klim Flood Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Flood Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Flood Hazard 8 City of Bishop Flood Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Flood Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Flood Hazard 15 City of Petronila Flood Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Flood Hazard 19 City of Robstown Flood Hazard 21 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Flood Hazard 24 Flood Hazard Overview Description A flood is the accumulation of water within a body of water, which results in the overflow of excess water onto adjacent lands, usually floodplains. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake or other watercourse susceptible to flooding. Flooding is the partial or complete inundation of otherwise normally dry land. Types of flooding include riverine, coastal, and shallow flooding. Location Sources of flooding in the Nueces County area include coastal flooding, riverine flooding, and flooding resulting from poor drainage, otherwise referred to as localized flooding. FEMA flood maps are the number one resource for defining location of flood hazard for a community. Current effective FEMA flood maps for Nueces County are dated 1981 to 1985. An update to the FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Nueces County Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the Gulf Coast began in 2006. Preliminary FIRMS for Nueces County were released on 5/26/2016. The updated FIRMS and FIS are in the process of becoming effective and are currently in the comment phase. The Flood Map project is part of a nation-wide effort to update coastal flood risk data. In Texas, this project includes 17 of 18 coastal counties. New FIS data and modeling will enable coastal counties and communities to make informed decisions regarding land use development, risk identification, and mitigation and recovery as it pertains to reducing hazard risk from flood. Adoption of updated flood maps in conjunction with development of a new county -wide Hazard Mitigation Plan provides Nueces County and its communities an opportunity to Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 1 1 If" ,n g coordinate and implement these two planning mechanisms into land use policies, regulations, and ordinances, and to alter the built environment to build resiliency to natural hazards over time. Higher regulatory standards may also be considered by communities to be more aligned with the county's regulations, and to more effectively, and responsibly, manage the local National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). This report section includes floodplain maps for each participating jurisdiction with the effective 1981/1985 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) floodplain extents and the proposed floodplain extents which incorporate the latest hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the area. Extent Magnitude of flood hazards is expressed in term of maximum flood depth experienced by the jurisdiction. Generally, homes that are impacted by more than four feet of flood depth are considered by FEMA as a complete loss. Therefore, flood depth combined with number of homes impacted by floods is one measure of a community's vulnerability to flood damage. FEMA flood maps designated Special Flood Hazard Areas that indicate areas of the County that have a 1`)/0 annual chance of inundation. A 0.2% annual chance of inundation floodplain has also been designated by FEMA, further detailing the extent of flood hazards in Nueces County. Occurrences Flood occurrences in Nueces County are documented in the NCDC Storm Event Database. The NCDC data reports include event details such as property damage, crop damage, injury and death. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 2 1 If" ,n g l 11111 10/30/1984 10/1/1995 9/20/1996 10/5/1996 4/2/1997 4/2/1997 4/2/1997 4/2/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 5/23/1997 6/6/1997 6/21/1997 10/9/1997 10/13/1997 10/18/1998 10/18/1998 Table 6-1. NCDC flood records 1984 - 2016 NM� \\ 1a o\ � \\ 1a o\ \ \ Q01111111111 .0101\\\\1�1 u01111111111 .0101\\\\1�1 111 0\1111\ 111 0\1111\ 1 l( 1 m 1 � m 1 IIS wi Min u `111111311 IIS wi , , mu , u ���`�aii��1�11i��a��liu�l��ii������,�\1���\\o����o�`�`h�a�,��\`�`�`�� X11111111111`���`�aii��1�11ii�a��liu�l��ii������,�\1���\\o����o�`�`h�a�,��\`�`�`�� 8/23/1999 6/10/2003 9/18/2006 3/14/2000 7/18/2003 7/2/2007 3/14/2000 9/12/2003 7/2/2007 3/14/2000 9/17/2003 7/3/2007 11/4/2000 9/18/2003 7/3/2007 8/31/2001 9/19/2003 7/4/2007 8/31/2001 9/23/2003 7/4/2007 9/2/2001 10/24/2003 7/7/2007 9/2/2001 4/6/2004 7/25/2007 9/9/2001 4/25/2004 11/16/2001 5/13/2004 11/16/2001 6/22/2004 7/31/2002 6/25/2004 8/14/2002 9/2/2004 8/14/2002 7/28/2005 9/16/2002 10/11/2005 9/17/2002 5/31/2006 9/19/2002 6/1/2006 10/28/2002 6/1/2006 10/28/2002 7/5/2006 10/28/2002 7/5/2006 12/9/2002 7/26/2006 9/17/2010 9/19/2010 9/19/2010 9/19/2010 9/20/2010 9/20/2010 4/29/2013 4/29/2013 9/15/2013 9/29/2013 5/13/2014 9/27/2014 10/11/2014 011111°;ii?m"1u��°';°;;,'��°1°���1��� 3/21/2015 3/21/2015 3/21/2015 4/22/2015 4/22/2015 4/22/2015 5/12/2015 5/12/2015 5/12/2015 5/15/2015 5/21/2015 5/24/2015 6/17/2015 9/11/2015 10/21/2015 3/1/2016 3/9/2016 5/16/2016 8/30/2016 Additionally, five non -hurricane, flood -related FEMA disaster declarations took place in Nueces County between 1971 and 2017. Disaster declarations are made at the county level without published detail of impacts to each jurisdiction. Consequently, these disasters are not described within the jurisdictional tables. Disaster Declarations are shown in Table 6-2. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 3 1 If" ,n g Table 6-2. Nueces County Flood -Related Disaster Declarations 313 9/18/1971 603 9/25/1979 727 10/30/1984 1257 10/21/1998 1425 7/4/2002 1439 11/5/2002 11111411 ttat\ 9/18/1971 9/25/1979 10/30/1984 10/17/1998 6/29/2002 10/24/2002 111.4 AA 9/18/1971 9/25/1979 10/30/1984 11/15/1998 7/31/2002 11/15/2002 W\T"W. V\A\ Information Not Provided Information Not Provided Information Not Provided $33,279,674 $27,960,004 $57,974,742 Table 6-2. Nueces County Flood -Related Disaster Declarations Cont. 1 1709 6/29/2007 4223 5/29/2015 '"1\\ 6/16/2007 5/04/2015 8/3/2007 6/23/2015 ttla $25,706,394 $57,635,747 Probability Probability and frequency of return were calculated by dividing the number of flood events in the recorded time period for flood hazard by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events. Estimated probability of future flood events has been calculated for each participating jurisdiction. The probabilities shown in the jurisdictional tables are based on previous occurrences documented by the NCDC database. Impact Impacts of flooding frequently include damage to people, property, buildings, and infrastructure. Flooding may cause bridge and road closures, service disruptions, and injuries and fatalities. Flood impacts are summarized in the jurisdictional tables. Disaster Declarations at the county level are detailed in Table 6-2. Vulnerability Asset vulnerability to flood for each jurisdiction can be found in the jurisdictional tables below. Major infrastructure is defined at critical utility lines (gas, water, etc.), highway, and rail access. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 4 1 If" ,n g NFIP Participation One of the most powerful tools businesses and homeowners have to protect themselves from flooding is flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Nueces County and the participating jurisdictions, with the exception of Petronila, participate in the NFIP. Nueces County and participating jurisdictions have a total of 243 repetitive loss properties, having received a total of $13,386,740.21 in flood insurance payments. Repetitive Loss properties are properties that have received two or more payments of $1,000 within a ten year period. Of those 243 repetitive loss properties, 28 are severe repetitive loss properties. Severe repetitive loss properties are properties that have received four NFIP payments of over $5,000 each. Ajurisdictional breakdown of repetitive and severe repetitive loss properties can be found in the summary table for each jurisdiction. With the exception of Petronila, which does not participate in the NFIP, all participating jurisdictions have developed mitigation actions related to NFIP compliance and maintenance. These mitigation actions can be seen in Section 19. All participating communities identified flooding as a hazard of particular relevance. Consequently, numerous mitigation actions were developed that will help mitigate the impacts of floods. Many of these actions relate to continued compliance with the NFIP and public outreach projects that exceed the NFIP minimum standards. As a whole, the participating jurisdictions recognize the flood mitigation benefits of exceeding the NFIP minimum standards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 5 1 If" ,n g Unincorporated Nueces County Flood Hazard a X11\111\1\0�1�1�1�1����1�����\���\��\\�»�,�,`�,m�„»�ii�»�,�,��,���,;�li��,ii�11111��1�1�1�����\��������������\���� » `\ �� � 1, �; 11 �; �\ �\ 100 1� 0\000 �� �� �� 1101 .111 110 12211•11111 all\ 01I�01�� o��\�� ���� �\\������ ���� ���i� ��`� \\\\\opo\������ `��\ ���»� ��������0������ ���,1� 11�\���,,,,,,,;���,„1��1��������������� �������0�����0�� �����\��1�„�;,1� ��,\����„�„��,������„;;;,�,,,�11` 11��,�1��101���1`�0�0���� ���\��\I,����1�,��\I�„������„111��,���1�1�1 Riverine Nueces River Localized Nueces Bay Coastal Corpus Christi Bay 6.19 tttt%%%%%EMER%SS% InWHIESSI ISEIBEAMM1 22 2 deaths (10/9/1997 Flash Flood) islssa.mmm.axts\\ suatimagniall inssuruntlay 33% annual chance 3 catass mon 11•111.11111% Enntrim tan 16,873 $76,164,618,941 9.24 3.31 stansuntanass���,,,,,�11�I1,,���,,,,11111511.,1,,1,I„�MIS„� � �� ��alllll���ll`�11��1� �i1� 39 $1,800,870.55 2 $407,058.37 111 111 1 11 1 lu I��� �� 111 1 0111\ 111 1111 111110110111111111111 11111 111 111111 I IIIIIII 111 11111 1 1111 1111 111 10 11 111 11 111 0\ 1 11 \ 11 \ 1 1 1 1 J \ .0111\0\00.111.110111 .1111111111 V`01111110@1�0�11��1�1 11111111111111111111111111111111110 1�1\0�0��1\ Illlllllll I� 11111111111 ��IIIIV. U 11111111.11.111111 .111 X1111 V\0\111111\101\111111\I1 „�1�111 1111 011D n 1 11 1.1111 1IQ1�111 n, \ 1 \ �IQ111111 11 �„�1�110111111V010) On, � 111 11�111�i10��tii11�11i��lo��i1`1�1���1,1``1\1��11�11�1�11�10�111���1a11,1i����lao�l�l�a�111��11�1��1�11�1��11���111ao,�1�1��111�1a��'lillll\1\\1\11��111111��1�\a��1��111,�»N�1io�lil�li�11t111i�1�»1i1��1i�11�ii11�li1�illi'i1��� �1\111”�`�`1�1����11101'�11�"�`11�i11�1�111111�11110,�11��\1111�111i1`�i11111�1i1�1`I��lii1�1111��1111111111�111�1�`�111�111�1101�1111�11110�11111`1111,11�1111��111�11�11\i1�1�1i11�111�111��11�111111`��111�1����`��1��1�” Assmd. Condo 1 1��� 11 111111 11�1� 1� onn Dam Other Residential Other Nonresidential ingle Family Residential Belvy Lake Dam Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam 1 1 36 Belvy Lake Dam Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam Chapman Ranch Lake Dam Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 6 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-1. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for Unincorporated Nueces County 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11 1000 itill,ll IV.i°" w�,lm il,Vilmuuuuu uutlllllllllluuuuumil ?luuuuumlrrorr 1 e1141167rn III Ir+ sins, Irorilr. 1 11111111 fit S... i1. 00 srrrrryirrr QUI 1111111111 III r7u hpllppu°(ililyllll°IIIllllir;gywtloluu Srrs,rrisrsrrirrisrsolisrriii,s lldwti� �. loca:id„ iirlullrrrwm wmaul ,. lite. Naescran d..: N linty zatl'ta Jlur'rxustiuu.arloraat Hazard Mirtrorgrotion ArctIrron Plan Cr, oresrr'rl,V!ariii PreVn'Uiw'i ury FEMA F1r' Jrphir4103, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 7 1 P a I, e City of Agua Dulce Flood Hazard sinatztatalvammemarma Localized Riverine Video Documentation of 2015 Flood Event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyx7IXaO1Lw Nearby creek 1.5* SSIBFEESSIIISSEBIFISSI 4 (all flash floods) 0 death, 0 injury asssssmznssss ssuzzonmansi assaimmalsa 6% annual chance 16.5 years cum crunla mutzut 110,7, gay 547 $114,757,767 9.24 3.31 0\110\lll 11111111111111111111111111111111`115100�00�11� 1 1 \ 0 1 1 11•11 CIAMTV7IFFIE�,»���;,»�»��,», »�,�,,,��a,;�,�,����n»�,,�„»� �,����1�1���� WEER o So o So 111 Agua Dulce Elementary School Agua Dulce Elementary School School Agua Dulce High School Agua Dulce High School Designated Shelter/ Emergency David Berlanga Community Center David Berlanga Community Center Evacuation Center Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 8 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-2. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Agua Dulce u u u u u u u l u u l u u u u u l u u u l u u l u u u u u u u u u l u u u u u l u l u u l u u l u u u u u u u u u u u u l l u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u l u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u l u u u u u u u u 1 11u,IrI IoIlIl1111111 IIoIrI11I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I 1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I11IrI11I111111 11111.11.11.1.1.11..1'1:111'1.'111''11.1'1.11'1:11111 IIlIlIlIlIlIlI InIr11I1I1I1I111111rI11I1I1IrI11I1I1Ir1111111111 1111111111 I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1Ir1111111111 11 I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1InIIr111111111111 I11I1I1I 1o11l11111111rI11I1I1IrI11I1I IoIlIlI1111111111111 IoI1I 1o11l11l11l11l11l1lIoIrI1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir111111111111111111rI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1Ir1111111111 11111111110111111 IlIlIlIlIlIlIlInIIrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir 1111111111111111111I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11011111111111111111111111111111111r11111111111111111111111 11111111111 1111111111 111111 11 11111111 I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1111 1111 I11I1 I1InIIrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1IrIfI fIoIrI11I1I1I1I1 IoI1I1I111111111111111111111 1111111111 111111 11r I11I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1 I0I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I11111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111011l r111111r11111 1110111111111111 i1 u u u 1111101 11111111111111101liii l '�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11 IIII iiiiuull ull I luuuuuuuluuuoiuuu iuulluuu iuu uuuualuuuuul iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluuuuuouuuuuluuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluuuuuuuoiuuuluuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuluuuuuuouuliuuuuliuuuuuuuuuuuuuulluuuuuuuul iuuuuuuuuuuuuul uuul iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuul uuuuuluuluuuuu 11 111 ul 11111!11 , I ��;;. ������ ������������������������������ ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 1111111.11.11.11....11...11 ,1 111 11111 1,1111 1,111111111 : 11 111111 11,11 . IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIII IIII 11111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIJII II II I 11111111111,0111III IIII IJII 11111 IIIIIII IJI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIuIII IIIIIJIIIuIIIIuIIIIIII 11u11111111111111 I III IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 11111,1101 1111,111101111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIII 111 II II 111111,1111111,1,1,1,1,1,1 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII I IIIIIIIIIII)1 II II I I 11 1 . III duuuuuuuumuuuumuuuuuumuummuumumuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummuuuumuuuuuuuumuuumil uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuuumuuummuuuuuuuumluuuuumuuuuuuuuuumuumuuuumuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu1u1m1u 011 Illhmu_. altttl YI,�h11h111R�10 _, ;,,,11 u 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 uulllll 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111hI111111111111111111111111111111111111111hIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl111111111u111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111hIIIIIIIIIIhIIIIhIIhhIIIhIIIIhIIh11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIII1111111111111IIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIu 1 IIII 11111dd111111 jlllpplfJ��,111111111ulllllll,III„IIIIII����1 IIT ,,, �,� �����,� ������ ���, ���� ���� 0 1111111111 uuu111'llllul1Ullll110 111111111 1111111111 1,1 rr 111111 �1J11 11111111VP dollood ooloolooloolloolooloolloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloollo j100000000000000,00000, 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110 II qi IIIIIIIIII pV toolofill II ,111111111111111111111m 111111111 01 /40,PEI UV* Cocci y L k r rrr ua reigt IMub-duniscitettikonaA Kazanc &NiVeillatil.,hwwes. 01itYpatinnAr;lBwnn w:74n u re Currenrand Prel4 nira rya FEWA 000 ern Nueces County Multi—Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 9 1 P ,n d', City of Bishop Flood Hazard ISSISSWEIRSIMSSM ISSIMERSIS 1111111111S1I stationnal imam. Intran Localized Nearby creeks � u u v � . v�� �ti vi��oi�� w va i iu v� osu� ��` v��`ti . uu� iti�� `titi 1 1� N ti»�1 1 1 n 1 �� Y 0 Om � 1 � 1 � � �1 1111 11 �1 1111 1 � � ��� �I ����� �� u�i� ����� u, l ���������������11����»��»�,»a»,�»�»,»���„»»�,»�»,���,»��,»,»�»�»�.�»��.a»�,»�»���10�����1�� 5 0 death, 0 injury IMSSSSMMMSS\SS ISEIMEraritnal IMSSIMEMS\Sal 7.6% annual chance 13.2 years assssszrasss um= vtanalma mernanv wartrum 1,756 $1,556,391,434 0 .06 isssssurttar x\\\‘‘‘‘‘‘m\\\\\\\\1 IHREE0111 %HER 111llo � ���a,;�,�,����N»�,,�»»� �,����1�1���� ���,�\�11 2 $28,195.18 0 $0 \ 1�v10 a 11n1n 1111 , » »MI "`��M » » 1„� Single Family Residental wiritzta lacratrainasi �\ 1 1v � nn No assets in SFHA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 6 10 1 Figure 6-3. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Bishop 111111111111111111111111111111111110 III11111� 'ii� W Ilul lllllu 1111111111 11111111111111101„ 0111,111100111•1110111111111111111111'1 H100,00:00111111111,00,0111 @vyu,00:00111 1 1000i1 iiiuuli'lu�iuoluuauz 1111111 I 00,0001 1 Hi 1,111111111111111111 11.1,1,1,1, 111111111111111111111 all.„H 410, 1,101011100000010°°10 ,°0 "0i00000,01010 1 0", HI U u'V , 1110,11 Ili 111°1111111l11jj iiiiiiiillipllVlllllll l 1i11 II II II 11Vr,,r„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„,„„„„„uiiiil010(10010.10lnlll,11li 01, "1"1111111111111111111111.j..,1,1111111.011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000 I N 1111 Dol0000001Rhllllllll� Od1 1111111111111111111 ,1,11,1„,1 110 11J1110J1ll] 111, 01010,1011,10,40 ij�lllliuu lll 11111:11:11111 ::1 '' �, � 11111191h dlld I�i� i l 1111 11 11111111111111111,11,1111 1•11 P�'�Ilul I I���I llliuull i"'1'1651,1.1! "I^ ' Iltlllll '1 „11,1„111 IIII,I���I1��4I�I'I1 11I�000 I11111IIa1j11101,10000111111100101111111111111 101111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111 1111, II111111111111111111111111111111111 I, 1111 10 ..1 °11111111111011111111111111111111111 ' .111'1' N1111111111111111111111 5� 111111111111111111111111'1'1! 101 q B',o, l Vllll OutllI I''Ald 11nllu�Ill0InIn Iln01 1,000000R000000011111 11111 11ll011111'00u li IIIIIIIIIIIII1I11 0 I II III I 1010' 11 it pl,i,, 1 pli IIIIIyy'", [I li �1 VI III,"III�II�IIIIIIIIIII�I�IIIIV I'I 11,� 1I 1 I' 'i111111001 mmummmmul1m11 pp ,uuuuuu dIIII 10 III �V1 I Ir,�II�I'I���������������, flil y Iliir r �iiij i,'iiiiiij �iillpi I nuwwmuwi 'w'w'uw�nyum,uuull� uouM11NNNmlpol 101111110000000001 Lot Ywwnt/4, 4lao0 m^m Ifiewmann. futon. 10110001 MwI -J uwear111d Cin',ge ki rd,Laoa"r .-m3r!'Dm r%kT,i "f ltb}Y71'}rt,;}*'q 'FENA, iK'MCMSwatrrss �VNIpINwwviu"G Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 11 1 IP ,u 000000 0000 City of Corpus Christi Flood Hazard SSSSSWMMIISISIIIW SSVIIIISSS slarmansti scrantatal unintalmal Riverine Corpus Christi Bay Localized Nueces Bay Coastal Oso Bay 10.62 ISSSSSIMEIaSSS ISSIEFERSII ISIESEREISI 49 Four injuries MUM1.»s»»>;;» ss SnallIMMISSSI 74% annual chance 16 months slasstass um= =non ow= mu= 115,871 $2,864,811,240,170 39.8 7.02 1 \ 111II II\\,1V ,1.11.,,,11lal1,,,11� VIETall„",,,IaVllla1,11.1,111,,,11 IMMO11,a,l„I,,,la,1.11.,,,11Iy\VI11,1„�„V>aal\\I,�1\�1111,1„�„,,\��,a�,\\„Iy\VI.�� �� �.. lig» ,,. �... �.. � .. �� �� ..o�» ,,. ,. �.. ,.. � .. �� �� ..111111A�1 � ���11� �� 9 ,. �. ., i,,,(111 �1\\ .1111111 ��11 0111�� 01\1\\\�\� �( ..1111�\�1� ���i1111 �1 1 1`111111 0 �1�111��1011,, 111�� �1�1 I 1\ � �0� 111 ���»��„�1a,;,�;�„�,. ���n»��,�»�,�.�1�� ����������������������\ ;,»�»��,», »»,�»,�,a,;�,�»���,��I�n»�,»»»� �,����1�1���� » �»�a„��e:,�,�,�,����,�\�11 171 $10,258,764.80 25 $4,573,225.47 1 1 1 1 , 1 uolauoaal.l�.l011 001�110 IV1�»ollliuoal�lllai 1 1���1��oa111a��1o�lliuo 1�11uooa»Ill I�lil�lly 101011 �ilu. ulnallol.11.oaa a�llllo va111�»I�Iultiaa111Va1i�loi �, ��V X11111 1 y 1V\ X0111\111 V n, 11111 ..111111 111p1191191V11 �\111. n, 11\..1111. 1191U1� PV\\111111VVI �„ uwU �11V11 1.1.194\ \ �VV1011 V n, 111111 11U1111 X111��,�h„�,»������»„»`�„�„Ilh»�»Ih»,�,»���,»,m»,»��'»,�,»��»„»��»�»Ohm»�,,,»�,��„»lhN�,»,,,�Il�i„IIS»��,�In1�,l�»��a�1��m„»»�,,,»�»�,,,�u��»�,.��„”,�,n�����„»,21.»,���,»,�1»�»„»�,�,wL x\11\��110\�\����1��1���\„Ila,»��,�,»�»�»,�6��»,»�»,»�»������„I„III„�,»�„�.����„»»`�„�,��»�»II���,»„�1�,�»�»,�»,»?�,»��1»,»,k�»,�„�1,»,»I,,,»1,�,�,»,��,��,�,�,»,�1����1010�0�0��������� 2-4 Family Residential 4 Assmd. Condo 13 Business Nonresidential 2 Other Residential 8 Other Nonresidential 34 Single Family Residential 135 1 0 � V \ 1 >u 1 .1110 >W \ .1110 9 9 l , n„ n„ � 0 n, „ c n„ � n„ 1� C 4. �`�”�`�`���»��a�»»�,»,�»�»�»,�,»��,�H�,»,��I����,Iia,»��»,�»�,»i�9��,�i9fi,�»�,��,�»�,���,X10»�I��»,�»�,�i�»,�»�»���»u��,,;»�11,,����,�,����1� �`�”�`�`���`�`��`�`�������������»��a��,,,�»�,�»�„»�„�,»��,�J�,»,�,��,��,li�l,��,»���9�»ail,�»�»»��»N���1»,�»»�»�„»�»�,»�»,�,»�»�„»�„�i�1,»i��f»�»,,�������`�`�������������`������������ Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Dam Fire Station Fire Station 15 Fire Station 16 Calallen Reservoir Dam Fire Station 10 Fire Station 15 Fire Station 16 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 12 1 If” ,n g School Wastewater Treatment Plant Barnes Elementary Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant Barnes Elementary Seashore Middle School Academy Jones Elementary Seashore Learning Center Los Encinos SES West Oso Junior High Wynn Seale Metropolitan School of Design West Oso Elementary Dr. ML Garza -Gonzalez Charter School Garcia Elementary Dr. ML Garza -Gonzalez Accelerated Learning Center Mary Grett School Cunningham Middle School Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 13 1 If" a g Figure 6-4. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Corpus Christi „4gdp o; ulllilll,11111i "' '''1'1'1'1111111111111,11111 1111111111111111 4pp IiVVV Ilit !VIII li1ii l 111111111111( .m�d�rrnwur. lIrrc., dl,Gihltt iu1/1-,JutlINirdi'r,i!'tr u1'rtp���'tuu n AetluOrli Plan Covet -1'111 arise Pif11:11irntirtity Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 14 1 P ,n City of Driscoll Flood Hazard ISSUIRSIS scriumnal vatatemtmal Riverine Creek north of the city limits Localized Localized flooding 2* ISSSSS.IMa.SSSS Kintat ISSN BER 0 0 death, 0 injury ISEMMEIZEM:»»»al ISSSVRE21RSSSI 1% annual chance* 100 years* * Typically sheet flooding. Based upon local expert opinion. The existing FIS does not include studied floodplain areas. The upcoming FIS will include studied floodplain areas and will provide extent (depth) information. slassasss um= ow= u= 610 $394,563,590 0 0.5 ISSSSSTIMZZnSSSSI\ \ » 713ESIAINIER 1�1"`���1�\��� 1 �� � � ���1�1 �`�I���i o�11�1"�»�,�,��,,�1,»�,�,»�»��„�la,;,�;�„��,. ����n»����»�,�.�1�� ����`1�1����11��������������1���������� ������������\ ��,����n»�,,�»»� �,����1�1���� �������»��»�,�»�,�,� �»�a„��e:,�,�,�,����,�\�11 0 1141\ n School $o Driscoll Elementary & Middle School 0 $o MASS Driscoll Elementary & Middle School Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 6 15 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-5. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Driscoll 111 001 II. 101 111111111 1 1,.11111111Y111111111III IIII 1 1 911911 IIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 1111111 II IIII II I IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIII III Him (IIIIIIIIIII II VIII h II V'IhhV'h'llllllllllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilimil1111' Illllllllhlllllllllllllll'llllh'Ih' 1'114111) II1111111 110 nnnnnnIII nnnnnn rl 1 nnnnnm nrn nnn r Im1iliiiu111,V.111V11111�����I 11,111�111 1 IIIIII VIII IIIIII, VIII I Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIII 1.111,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II u l lililUUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IiIIIIIPIiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIII. „. (IIII II IIID' Y' Ioi0Ilv 11111111 i1111111 0111011 III Hill 'Idi 11111111111111 III11 I1111 111111 °1111'1111111111111111111111111 �I4YIIIIIIIIII@II'llllll l li 111111111 IIIIII Ilvll�luuu9111Puuuulll 111111 IIII II iilpuuul IIIIII q H111..1.1.1.1.1! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.UIIIIIII ����� ��������� III. 111111 �Ih a uulViii'uuuouuouuum 1II Iiii1'' 1111 ;111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11119111111111111V111111111j1jlj' 111111111111111111111111„111110 • N1111111I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111- 11111111111111111IIIJIIIIIIII ���1111';1'. � 1111 If t i " 1 l 1� i rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r rrrrrrr rrrr 1� I 111 1 I�Iu 1 1111111 1111IIIIp� NpppIul11uu11uu11uu11u11umuuuu11u11u11u11u111uu11u11u11uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummII uuI1um1umu1Iulimi 11u11u11111I; , I 1 IIl 9 V 1 1 Nynuuuuuuuuuuuuuppuuuuunumluuwlpl 1111III�1„„„„11111111111111111,111111,,l,„„,,1 m11d 1 1111 III611iill111liiilI111111111111161111111111IJJIII11911111(1111 + r 11 MI111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111�1 l 111011 11110 m11uum "1111 uuiiii11111 luuuuul uo IIII11 yll� 111,1111111 I I III' 1111111II 'IIIIII11 I I II IIII II IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I „. 11111111 111111111 1I1111111iliii 1 11111 11111111111aiiiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiiiiiiijlllliiiii1?I901 l i111111 111° 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111_111 11„, , , 1 11 1 uI 01 1111111111010 1111lllllhhllllll 1000 II j1 1II 1I1111I 11 I"11111h111111pu 111111111111111111111111111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1111 I II a 11i uiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuii ll I 1�! 111111 111 111a1 111111' IlI 111 1 11111 1 I I11111111 1�In u II III iwI1 „�i+,Ileurydf Nnu0 ��po�relrl w111�111�1 I �11NIII;;;.I lfl1,l,lwlll�lul .A„ (II«IL1:II. fI'r(1rI1',11I((((i(i(i(u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((1((1(((I(l(u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u(((((((�(y(I li' ^11I�I1 II hIIII II ;. I11111l11 111111 II, n lIIl, ���� 1111111 1 111 1 1�lll1; d 1 I00 II111l lll1lII11 k n I i 1Ul";u oiry1 111 III 111 11 lIIllllllllllllllllllllllI 1 1 01lii1 11111i11Illl11l IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII116 111111 ' � � I p lm r "� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I »���J'l i l � l III I'( �I "IiI 11111111111111111111111111 11111111111 I 1 Hp �w, r NNIINNNNNNNNN!l1���(Y111111h 1r h1111111111 %116^N'a"� "lY/4u1N "" v,il(jffffffftliii I'I 11111 j111?1111111111 1 1 1 1 (IIIIIIIIIIII uuuli 1 j j 1 uilllluuuuuuuuuml III 111 110"'" Ilr111111111111111 111111111 1 001 000000000001111 11111111111 X111 10111 111111111111111111111 III 11111111 111111111111111 111111111 I,I, III"1111 II IIIIIIIII;;;!�;;;;;11111i1iijiiillif iliiilillP11111P1111PP111 1I ?I�II111i11111'1I1�11111J11, 1111 IIIIII I IIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIII�PIII 111 ip➢ul�llllll� ,Li'11111,8 Lockwood, Andidows &. 000000krvhruc. 11 AXIOM 17 n fti u.uYti ,J1pori•E4CIt'iOnaI Has Nlutigafioo A.cti'on Plan Current ,end Pristk o unary tl MAIFNknx,,pU3dav1'a ' IMI' IuMM111MH1NH1NH1NHIW Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 16 1 P ,n d1, e City of Petronila Flood Hazard ISSISSWEESSISISM ISSUMISSS ,, ,,1 1„��l ,�„ ,11, 1"11 ,,1 1�, imaretuntan����\,111 ,��I\11����1�1��11��`��� ��11����1�11��1���11��������� �1�1���»���,����10�1��10�1���,���,��,���,��,`����,;,;,,;���„„1�„�,�������1�0����� �1����10�1���,��1,�,,,�,,,,,���1������1���1�,�,;;;,,��„��„`,�,���„���1��1��1�� ��,,���,,,,,ll�,�,��,���1,���,;101111 Localized Localized drainage 4 SSS: Mtn\SSS 3 (all flash floods) 0 death, 0 injury MS%%%% ISNEMErrnit SSSSIMMMSSS\1 4.5% annual chance 22 years slassass um= =non ow= mu= 159 $14,345,526 0 0 0 nn,„ � nn cl „1 E , V ,, ,� �, IIS �u� �� »����,�;;�,�»�»�»,�»��,�u�`�,»,�„�»�,�,,»,mow„»,�»�,»��,»,�� I\\\\\‘‘‘‘M\\\\\\\\1 110\lll 11IMMISSS ��0 1 1 1 \'\11�1i�����i`illo � � ���111 �`�I���i o�l��� 111��,�,»���;,»�»��,», »�,�»,�,a,;�,�,����n»�,,�»»� �,����1�1���� �������»��»�,�»�»,� �»�a„��e:,�,�,�,����,�\�11 $o INESETEEMEEEKIMII 0 $o SSISE 11 °,�, , ;,� ,„»,�;;,EM,1?`�;,;`1111\111111�0111111111\11����� I No assets in SFHA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 17 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-6. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Petronila 1111111111111) ) �111111111111 1 �uuilll°llllllllllllllijii1•1III ' 1,1 ,w 1111 I 01 1 111 0011111111111 01 11111111 ow 110 111100IwIIIIIIIII 10 � I 11 1111 11 1111 1 1111' • ill ol to 1 IIgi .1111 .1.11111 1.1.11111111111.1.1.111 11111111 It I III 1111111 II lo 11111111 o rl IiIpl 1•u 1•u j °How o 1 11111111111111111 oIIIIIIIIII" II 11111111111111 11 0 II IIIII� loo 1'1'1111. 1111.111.11" IIIIII:00111010111111111111111111111111,01,o„ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111, tottoto „„„.t " '111111111111111111111 1111111,1,1,1111, tl.1u1 01'01111 lllul'll'l'llll'llllll'I'll'l1OO1 IIII Ila "jI' IIIlu11111IdIlIPP1111161 ��1 ). — ttlttlt1;11'1'11:' l'011OOI.1.."11.1111 IN.11. 1111111111111111111111111111111111 SIINIS'00G�II10 I'111 lII ,1111 1111111 1 111 1111111111111111.; • SII 1I,� II II I pl 1s II !I1100,01L.. a to 1111111111111111111111111 it 1111 1111111 IIV 11111 L pl111•1111110,l III III 11 11110000000000 IVl11IIIIV 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 NIN�NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111 N 11 101100011111111111111111111111111111 1 111,0 wI 1111111111111111111111111111 I 11 111 01, w II,III � 110 1'111•1 V Is 1"' 11 ..IttOttlIlltr 1.1 11,. 111 11 ollo11111'1 '11111,'1 81111111 01100,11000,00 0111.01,01 ���d))d) �� 1•1•1•11 I II 1111111111 000111111100000000000 1•11 �'ulIw'n♦M 4w0Il� edI 1111p1111111 ppu ... I1d1Npl��f I 1 00,00o.1N 1 yy I wllll IAI10A1P� 1� 1111 111 Leawood, Andrews g0, Pre MOM. I x., 1100011010001010100wow111j�Al III 11111111111 111111 11111111 01110 „iv wwww; (IIII" p r"'Ipl Iwww 11111111111 orktOdsttoreszOttc..9 cw n a,ed Mitts/gol'haec.+.w 1111.7 re Plan .:.mvrrrn4';w'eid r,r:uis tiircw�-'r rIE..u1r,„r4Owap'ti§ lei 11; 1111111111111111111111i1111II 1111 R1R111I11 oollol I 1•1 • 11 olool0000ll� y 111 111111 .� 0m,... Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 18 1 P City of Port Aransas Flood Hazard SSSSS\NMMISSSS\W ISSUIRISS Istaimalsi siammitall ummtramma Riverine Localized Corpus Christi Bay Coastal Gulf of Mexico 13 — 1% event* ISSEEMESSI 1111:5131•111111 8 (all flash floods) 0 death, 0 injury �r-,gid yISSSS.S\.\nit 111-AUISSISTIMISSSI 12% annual chance 8.25 years sssssszraas mum sumG u mu= 11,345 $34,933,446,050 8.56 0 100�00�11�1,,,,\,I 1111 »„111,»MEE ,,\,,, IC »»�,1111 aISSSSS\TIMZZnSS\S\S »„1,,,1a,1.11.,,,1�lal�,,,11�. a 1�a1,�al . , �„ �� \V��,,,1,1y,V111,1,1„1 V>a>,9„ 1 � ,9,II ��I I1 � � .�.I1 .��.�. � . 1..Ila 0�� �I 1„x,11\ �11 ,\\\,o�I,I�\111 m 1 fl� 1�»11 \..1"� 11\II�»�11\�111A��1111\III1111�11�111\II�111\I��A1�I�,ll�5,1\1»�\11)1\Y�,„�`�\��`�1\���������\�������������\�����\�\��� �111\11111111111,1�111�,1\II�II���IIII\1111\11\1@ I�`���"III��IIIA\I\II�IIAIIII\IIII\IH�\111111I\�P11\1111\IIII\11��11111\II\�II\11���\�1 19 $993,444.31 1 $122.378.68 ,,,,\, \\ » 1.11 �I\11 , »11», 11\\\ »» \1111 \» »»»»1 »1111 \,,,, 1111, ,», \\, I .111»» 11\ »» » � � 111 ,» 1 1 1v o1 � v 111 1� � ,ta ,11 uulauoaal.l�.l01� 001��10 tiV1�»olllilioul�lllai 1 1���11�oa111a��1o�lliuo 1�11uooa»111 1�o1111y lololl lila. �ulal�ol.�ti.oaa a�llllo v�11�1111oil�ua»IV�1i�loi �, �a1V 111111 1 y 1V\ 110111\111 V n, 11111 ..111111 111p119119�V11 �\ 111. n, 11\..1111 V 1 \V1UI� PV\\1111111VVI �„ �V �1\V11 1 11194\ \ �VV1011 V n, 11..111 ..11111111 \ .., .., II II ., 9 »I �� m, .1 a m, m, „.. ,., II �� fl� . Ix„ II l� X11\\I\\1»IIlu1�11»��»r�»11»�11�1111h»�»II9111�1»I��1»Im»I»�»I�1»��1111»�m�»O�m»111»�,»�,1»��IN�»I111�II�i1111ia»�IIIIh1�1��11�Ia11��m11»»�11»�»I111�u»I»�,.1111�v7»�»fti��ll»,21.�1l�»l�»�v»l�l»�»»»�,»��\0���� ������������������»l�al»�1��1»I�1��111»»»�»II,�»N���»m�»6��»6t111�u1»»�»II�»I»�»��he»�„11»»�»1��1�»»»�»111»��»I»,�»�N�\v�»�1»»�»�v�»�»�1»I»�1»Iv����������������� 2-4 Family Residential 1 Assmd. Condo 1 Other Residential Other Nonresidential Single Family Residential »» 1 „\ ,111 1 , » „1 „» 1»1»»II»»»II»» 111 �\ »I »\,1» 1111 „» 1»1»»II»»»II»»,111 »»»,1» 1»»,1»1\,1,,,,,»„»»» 1»»»»I»,,,,,1\ 11»11»I »»»»,1\„\ \ „\, u ,,, ou „ 1 li, a 1 ,» i � V � u 1 1 V � >>1 � 1 V \ nn „ nn nn „ n n 1110 111\\I\\�»mo�111»II»�»III»�»III»��II�I�\I��»I111�11»�Imial»»11»I�»I»��1„� nlll\`�”�`�`�`�`»mu�mll»I111�111»I�11»I1��11�1�»I»I��»'V»4@»IIID,11»,�»IIIA\1»II91i1»,1111»,Ilr��l»I��1����»I�1»,11`0�»I,1»�,IV191V»Ni�1�6,lamw���\�\�\��\�\ Dam South Jetty Dam Fire Station School 2 6 10 ,,,\ »» »,\, ,1»1,\»„��,�„ �,» 1» 111»1,1,» ,,,\,\ »»I »,,,1\11» »»I» »»» 1111311111111 0\1\11111111�� �y, ;111»�;I�» I11; Il� �,�i1�111%»S ME11�1;�;il ,111�»,�1; Port Aransas Fire Department Port Aransas Fire Department Bundrett Middle School Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 19 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-7. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Port Aransas dN ,,,,,,,,111111111111111111111111111111111111;1111111111111111 111111111111 poi MAZE Cazrtj 4,Ax*wood..Afidmewo SNA IJ hN- a riscActiY]T'h',a'I'Hazard Homan'. Xr . MiltAdallean Aeti n, 1,13tw'r Current end Pf8H134113P: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 20 1 P a e City of Robstown Flood Hazard ISISISSWERIS.SISIM SISCMIRSIS 11111111111aSI imanantatal imam. imam Riverine Localized flooding Localized Nearby creeks Updated FIRMs and FIS are forthcoming. This extent value comes from the effective 1986 FIS. 14 — 1% event IMSS\S.SZMEIII.SSS\ �y aSaallignal 13 0 death, 0 injury sssss.smzznsss.s.s. R�e�t, f...<....... �._<'��ccP� sassurmssam 19.7% annual chance 5 years um= =non ow= mu= 5,934 $3,619,085,359 15.83 3.43 ssssssurtwznsss , 0 sEmcatimm,��������������������������' ��������� � ����i�,�,»��»,�,»��,», »�,�»,�,a,»�,�����N»�,,�»»� �,������� IEEE" 13 $305,465.37 0 $0 », m » ,�„ of ,,,, a, a ,,, ,� � ,ta ui EMI i � u u iia uo�� i o .iia 1� a��� �i� � y��i������ 0��1 tiauti5�u� �i� ilii i�� ii��ii�iii i� a„ ������ �� v � ����o��� i� s��i���� y•�o� o�� a���� . u iiia ��o� . �ti .o a 1� a��� � �o ���»��>>��u� tiauti5�u� �i� poi ��va>wa�1����, ���01� ��ltitiU�ua� n ���� ��»> q�p�l�li�ui��a�i�� n �o� v�� � ��u�o�a'zN�������u�l ��tiuwu������ � � �01��\��u��o��vn ��»u ��1»��� ��) �, 11111 1 �) �11�� ^ �) 11 �) � i II\\I\uN@,iu»»�,ai»��»»�1�»,�,��e»�»,11,,�,�»»�,��a»,�»�m,�m»�»»��,IiVm»,�m�m��»»�»4�»»�m�»»�,14�„�»�»1N1`��i»i41�»�Ilmll,�i�mll»Nf»��i,�ma�m»�m�»��mm»V.u,��m,�,11�»,�,�»»a,.�1�\»�0�,»�»��Im��,m�u„��� h111,`�”�`�`�`�`�`��`�»�I��u,��»»a��»4�,»�1»N»»��ou»�»,�11��»�m�i»w,l��»Nlu��,�,»'N�.uo'�i»�,»�lu�u`lily»�»�Imu��»»��u»�»u»Iii»,��u»i�»»�»�m�»0��,»ak,�»»�m��,»a`R,�,�1\,»�14�,m��111111�1„�`�`��1�`�`� Other Nonresidential 1 Single Family Residential 12 »» »» ti»,»»�»»»�»» u�a u m »o �» ,ti »„ �»m»a»»»�»» ua »»u, m »�»» i»�»» iu�» »»�a m» »»�»„o,�, ,�m�», » a �»»o„ , ,o, o„ m» ,» u�»iu,�o,�ao oo»,o »�,»»�a„ v,,, m»�, »�,,, „u»,»�» m»ai „u v»»,o , »» u >u u � 111 111�� nn „, nn nn „, n t ,„„ n „ J nn „ n \ �� n ,, n,„ 111i1�»i�llll»»�mu�»u»,»1m,»��a,111\I11�\,mm��»,�am11\»,1,»i��a»»w1111111111 h�`�"�`�`�`��»X10'»»�»»��umou�»»���,I�»u»�11�u11u��11»,A111111iu,»�»�IN11»NI�11�mu�umu1��»MI»»�II�1,»�mu��»�»n1»,�Ih11,»I�II�'�I»�116������������ h�`�”�`�`�`�`�`��`�`�`�`������\�»�101u1uu»,�`»�»�,»a,��ud111�»»�111111,�Miu��N1,»111111»NI�1�»Nk�»'1Vuu»a��,l����1»»�»ipY»,�»�»a»>�,»a»»111�»,�m1,»I����»II��»�m�111,1,\1�1„��"""""\„������������ Emergency Operations Robstown Emergency Operations Center Robstown High School Robstown Seale Junior High School Lotspeich Elementary School San Pedro Elementary Robstown Emergency Operations Center Robstown High School Robstown Seale Junior High School Lotspeich Elementary San Pedro Elementary Hattie Martin Early Childhood Center Solomon P Ortiz International Robert Driscoll Jr Elementary Salazar Crossroads Academy Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 21 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Robstown Wastewater Treatment Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 22 1 If" a g Figure 6-8. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Robstown 0„..0.0.000400001001110 a fI ��� °IpDlomwww IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII......... III IIIIIPfIIi IIIII1 IIIIIIIh9111o1111, uuiuluuuuuuuliIIull,uullllllllll00� 00000m001 V 1110 010 00010II ,„000000000000000000000000000000000000000,000000000000000000000„0,,,, I III "1'10 0111110000uii,01,00lllll 0000A0 0.0:1010.0000,0 ��I'��I19l.IIl1u.lIl1.00lIll�11.lI11.l1 01uI1”1Il1I11l1u�1"111I100l6u1"l�llv4uIll10-l"llip1ulll1, u"lI1"l' 1r4I1"I1r1I1"lI1I1,fvId4IlI1IiI10I1„I10I1I1I1I40I1 I1I1I1 I1I1I1I1I1I11IiII1I1"1,I1"11,jju VI"IIIlI"IlIIlI"IIII"uII",uInIilId iiIlIlIlfIIIuIlilI d u0 I�IIlI'NI�I'I"IIlII�I Iy�;ar1, ,+7�i�I jI�l(I�1I"Id'JI"luNJ"lIJ 11111111 "qII'�00I�j0"�I00' i 1:1:1'",11.1; IJ�� 0 I11.11,�.1�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI�IjI llhl111111dI1111 ll�lIIllllllll011111111,111110,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,„1,„1,1,:1,1,1,1„.1 „,,�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 0000000100000010001010101010100.01000.00.00.000000000IIlii 1Y 1 1p ((III I, IIinIulI, III 10000000000000'''''''''''''101111111111100100000000,00000,0„. 0100100000000000I�U10 IIIIIIIIIIIIiu llllllll)l11llllllllllllll0000;,,,� 00..0.004000000'"°; °0101111111111.1.01.1.011101.00 00 0 UW �ol�.11 e 61 III IY�I,;'111111111111111110 0001011111111111111111111111111111011 • �>IIn 11un 11011 NIHolo 11 Y.. sd1 01111000001, 0,011 111 F 111111111111111111111111111 Lrbr:W rr zaml. Arldrith 14 1444w4w4m0 Un^r. 01110 0000.„000000000010000111,110110000000000100000001000010000001111010000000000000000000000000000000,0000000000000 CA,Lec ,0s, 00:'.;aaa,.u,G^/ 1/idCY-,'LurdadkC'S;enad Hazard M01003, ?donAc'aonPian 110000 lent and Plrettrninan; 001E1110A0111.0014,013Tv 10100101 III° ,1011111111111111111111111 1111 1 111111111111 11 IIu101 611 „a 1y „ ";;J:,11 0 11 'jilprr;;vllill$ Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 23 1 P 0003 000000 0P Port of Corpus Christi Authority Flood Hazard III\3\1\JNPjwIalpllsISNII*MAssmml\l)\II\AssltlltllIllsl\tw tssfitfi\Astam`zwiusu Coastal Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay 12 — 1% event* *Updated FIRMs and FIS are forthcoming. This extent value comes from the effective 1985 FIRM. SSWEEInntISEMERAS1 No records* No records* SSSSS\E•t\SSSSS\ SIVIMIEntnalaSSIMMIESSSI 1% annual chance* 100 years* *PCCA owned property is located within Unincorporated Nueces County. Flood event records for the county do not indicate which events impacted PCCA owned property. At a minimum, according to the FEMA floodplain maps of the area there are ��at1 Etrantao\ lillVrlrrlllyllrtantdllenMUElolloo�� 11�� o�aool� loll 1 log 1 0000 loo ��� \ � Doll �11 0\ 111� 1 101 111 oll l111 0� 011111111 X1101101 \ \\�1 111.. \1� \\\\0\111 \11 .11 . \1 .\ 1 11lel � I1 �111�11\ �� ��\ �\11 IDI n, „5�� �1� �\�I\\\\\ � �1 � „ !I1 �1� \\ �\ �\\ , � 11 a , 345 $174,026,681 .8 21.5 lssssslttzrzsss\s\1\ �t vornimartow1 x\11 � � �I � 10 1 Ir\\�I�I�a1�`I�o� 111 �`�,� ol�l�1 1�1 � n \� I1�1� 1 � �1I� �� ��� II �I I��,�,�.,��In,„��»„�,����� ���`��1��1�\��1�����������������\\\»�����\��`��� ����1�,�,��,��,,,��„�,�,��,�„�,��,��In„�,,�„����1�1��������1�,���„�,�,�,�,�� �,��,����,�,�,a�a��„�11�111 o so 0 so Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 24 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-9. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for Port of Corpus Christi Authority Property 11111111, ' ro, rh41i iiia „�,,; --010411111111 111 %»111111111111111111111 imiu,a o V��t WDM„,kd'roabwAA urron, IIlp,roiw, Cw�'t.b.,yr,�rie tb4;µrro�rnaat Hazard Nktrooimool At'lon Plan CaIrrent ir7C9 P'rctrox"Iolar°.y Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 25 1 P ,n ,2 11111111 111111111m 1111111111111 11111111111111 1((((((((11111 1(011111 Drought Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Drought Hazard 7 City of Aqua Dulce Drought Hazard 8 City of Bishop Drought Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Drought Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Drought Hazard 11 City of Petronila Drought Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Drought Hazard 13 City of Robstown Drought Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Drought Hazard 15 Drought Hazard Overview Description Droughts can be classified as meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, or socioeconomic droughts. A meteorological drought is a reduction of precipitation from the expected average or typical precipitation patterns. A hydrologic drought occurs when below average rainfall impacts streams, lakes, reservoirs, and groundwater levels. Agricultural droughts are brought on by insufficient moisture in the soil, typically impacting crops. Socioeconomic droughts occur when water demand exceeds supply due to a precipitation -related supply shortfall. Droughts may initiate or exacerbate other hazards, such as extreme heat or wildfires. Location The spatial extent of a drought tends to be relatively large, often stretching across multiple counties. Consequently, the entirety of Nueces County is vulnerable to the impact of a drought. Crops and livestock are vulnerable to drought. The overwhelming majority of agricultural land is found in the western portion of the county, mostly in unincorporated Nueces County. Additional information about agricultural vulnerability can be found in the jurisdictional tables. Extent The Palmer Hydrologic Drought Index is a value calculated monthly by NOAA. The PHDI index takes the balance between environmental water supplies and demands. The index Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 1 1 If" ,n typically ranges between -6 to +6. Negative numbers indicate a period of drought. Positive numbers indicate wet periods. Table 7-1. Drought Extents ISSVZEMttMSISI - 0.5 — -1.0 - 1.0 — -2.0 - 2.0 — -3.0 - 3.0 — -4.0 < -4.0 Occurrences , 1i1�11 � ` 001 1 o1�a � l 1 1 11 � 1 � 11 111100 01111�111�1111 101001011111\11�� ti1�1�\\\\0\111 � 11,1\ .101 \\111 111 1 \1\1 ( 1 \ \���10�1��10�1�1���1,,;„1,1,`;,1�„,,„\;,,;;�����„���;�„y��\�1�0�1��1���\���� Normal Incipient Drought Mild Drought Moderate Drought Severe Drought Extreme Drought Droughts in Nueces County typically occur in the summer months. The months of June through September have the lowest average PHDI. PHDI values for Nueces County come from a NOAA North American Drought Monitoring station (USW00012924) located at the Corpus Christi International Airport. Table 7-2. Summary of Nueces County Drought Occurrences issvratirrimpal 11 �l000u �1 1111` � 111urenoto�� 11111 111 110X 1 1 111 111D1 ��11 1mem1 � � 11111111001�01111111111,.110101 � „ m�,� � �� �m \ � n� ,,, 11111 e Incipient Drought Mild Drought Moderate Drought Severe Drought Extreme Drought Total Months of Drought (PHDI <-1) 39 5% 164 21% 113 15% 63 8% 15 2% 357 46% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 2 1 P a 11111111111..111.1111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111IIIIIIIIIm°IIue X141141111111111111111 0 111111111111111111111111101101.1.1111111 1111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111.111 111114 X111 ,� Vllu 1111111Vm 111\ II1�11111111111 II11\\e PoinpO 1114 u\ A " 11o1aaeil 110. 1df`11 11/I e11V11./1 g1111111 u 111011101110111ou111m1!1011 .1V 1e,V111 u1!'1„11u111!1m111e11u111lY 1\\\ m11lelmIII1111I!111 o11o111� 101 11 000 1111111 11 t..0 1111111111111111111111111111 11111111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 u 1 11111111111111111111111111 III 1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 ;1111 w 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111;11111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 uzlmu1111 111111111111 X1110 11111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 11111111,111111111100.111111111o.„'1111111'1111111111111 I11111111111111111111 V14'.0111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 II IIII 111111111111 lAlppl A. 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11i�I�Y' ig11111111!e11111111111111i11, e 1111Uigi9111!luol ILNpmm1111111 e1111, 1 SII AL... 181oI1111 II 1s1, I.l00000i9i0l00 00, I0IUpPoi0ii a00.0.000.000000000,1�r,1 11�IVIIV e11�111NI1�1101m11Vilaee g111110l0i000i1011110001 0111 111110NII11 uV111\11111100nllllililnVNllleililliil' 1\1111�'i1111!III!lump0'pNe N� 111 1, 11'111' 1,umy' u�111\11il0li0l0li0l0i06li0l000tii�1111p1�1' V1"1 iViiilp!!Ip!PIN"�'uiiuiiillllll�' Ili„IY IIT^p11\ 0liilliil0iiil�idl0liil0liilliil0liil0liil0 too `d) \\11\ 1„Y II„, Il lelil p11\11111.11110101.0000epiil0liilliillipY' 11Uu1ii!Illlpmlm 1llliiii0! II 1.. I;1g 401116101160011111116001116110' p111111u0ullll'", °iN olllllll` 1\ 1' r I mI 1,�Y1u 101111)'111)111t"11)1111"11;14 %' ep1III'1 11 1uIII1pl" 10"11111111111111Y 11IY11111111t1111111111' ep11Uu1111111',°, °i 111 'iil 111\III I 040° VIII; 111111\101 101 l011p6101\10m0m0np011 IIV1II111ulmpl;!, ei m uV111\1x11,\.„„\oiiii0i111„1' ep11i111ux1!ip°�, "p 1141m`I u111N1101�10p'iOtlIPtl10p10010 111111111ii1�lA liil�liil�l0010 .\\i\i.\A111ii�iiii , „;0111111 1Vg"..i..\"1 \"1..'11bii11giiii 10, 100' 111, 1 p1100101000610001000000011' Iry%!, 1 up1116i, 1p11111mi1ui61i11)1ii61i1111i�11i010 0� 1,1110.,,,„ I ll�l";'l„IN'rlu!�11�iiimq 1, ,0000000000000.0000.0, II0000,1 11U9i 01111111111111111,1I1`IIIIIIIV r1,': log it 110 ',00000000.000.00000,00, 1w 0u!Vlllllll0lllllllmim"11. 01, 1111101101101.0110111011011011011010' 4''.1110111)91�IIui�IVIIIIIII�IIIIIUIIIII�i�N11� 111\11,GWTi1�`° li�!uj 1110010111111111.1111011111111111111111111111111' 11Uulillp��IpIIIVI10111111P,!5, III r04.0.PI�RVIIV' 00101.11111111.0.111111111110111.11110' )11IIuGIu�liui010�ill`giu 11\Il 'Wa1 1111; �1�1p1\01�ml�1iiljp610m0mii6iiog,' I " 1111 \". 1 11 1 u 11.. 11 IIIIIIII I 1U "11W VII IIII 111111110110110110110110110111011011' 'p11'1y'1.i''IIIIIIIII'Illllll,1', . Table 7-3. Nueces County Historical PHDI Values (1948 - 2017) 6 \I I IIII 11 III 111 1111 1111111 �1i1 " 1 liiiulll V"� 1 11111151111111V e\1 II �IIw1„l\eu„u^^,.NIVIIIIIIIIIN\;^\IIr IIII\. 1111119'iolam\mfflglo6ioll' 11111111io1lo1l01l011011o11'ioliolloli $111111111011011011011011o11o6i eW o u„ 1110 III III1"111111 u du1111i1i1,e� I . ' 1\1 I ,111 � D„ 1 1 1.\11111' 11111111111 \\1111111111 om�1111oi11ol1i1ol1oll �Vu11111iiuiiuiiuiiuiilliiel�Ihi111111 �Vu11111iiuiiuiilliiuii11ii11ii11iiuiul -0.05 -0.07 0.61 0.61 -0.17 -0.72 1111111111111111 Iln:11111111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1111111 111111111 ,IIIIII III 111.14 111111 1111111111111111111 quiuli1 uu II. 6 u1m11111111.. Il 11111.,1, 1 111 1 om 111111111111111111 mHll11110111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111', H.. 0.79 -0.85 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ®UMe ��uwiluu�Ill� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII In12 ..110111111111111111111 1112 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111 1111111111111111111 111111111,1, 1 dll11ll..lr4 II illlllll I 1111111 11wIII IVi IIII ..� 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 11111111I II 11111111111111111111 1uIIIII11u 1 11111111111 III 1111111111111111111 111 �x� 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111,,,, 1111111 1111111111111' .111,11,1111111...,, 11111 Il.um..u11u 111 moi '111111111111111 IIIII III umIlii 11 1 -0.77 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i111111111111111111111'111 X111• W� i1w11� Illvourtoontronot III 1111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111m 11111111111111111115111111111111111, i1m1111mpmW1 1111 luluuu!ae 1111VIIIVIIIV �VAA11111111111111111111111111111111V uu1111111111N1V mumumumum��mu p %1111111111111111111101111111111.....„. liiilimumiiuuiIlm iiiiiiiiP IIIIIIII„ ��IIQII�1111,,,, 1 1 \l 11 \\ 111 \ 1111 1 u e d 1� \ u a Illi 1� II ,, , , a lol�l01�1'$111111111x!ilol�l0610111o6eoilol1lolol�l' -0.84 0.3 -0.4 -0.85 -0.63 000 II 1 1jilll 11111l1111111111III a't^t19 11 11 I�11II111111111 IIIIwlw1 11111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111 IIIIIIIii1111111IIII 1 0 11111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 111111111111 mm1 1 111111111111111111111111.11111111111..........1111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII111111111.111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 PAw!� u11u 1111111111111111111111111 111 001111.111111111111111111111111111 3.41 4.17 3.77 3.22 2.45 1.59 1.04 2.05 2.72 2.32 2.23 2.5 2.97 3.21 2.37 2 2.23 2.61 2.31 2.31 2.13 4.7 4.31 3.58 3.96 2.97 3.18 3.63 IIII 1...!IIIIIIIIIIIII 1111 111111111111111111111111111111 hum 2.09 2.52 -0.6 1.05 1.89 1.76 2.48 11111111111 ro 11111 1111111111111 1000000001.04l1/141l1.1111.1110.1011111111111111111.. 111111111111 "I. �uuuuuum umiumiiiiil' °I'IIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111110111101111111111 11111111.1111111111111 1111111111111.0....111111111111111..Ill 11111111 X111.1111111111. 11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11111111,11,1 11111111111 mmm'dy 111111111111 31111uii... m uuuuuuui1111111111111111111uuu I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuluuuuuu 1111.11111, 111111111111 2.18 2.59 -0.74 111111111 1" 11"1111.0.11111 2.15 1.56 1.64 nnm�nnnm 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111,,,,,,1111 "1 11111 2.07 2.28 0.89 10°u111111 1pl0uuuuul� 2.07 0.99 2.49 1111111111111111 11111111111.1.111 11111111111111111111 immummum 11111111111111 mu. 1.111.11.1111111111,11111111.1111. 11111.111111111111 11.111111111111.1101.orr 1111111e loo Hsu 11 11111111111111111 1, Illlllllllllll 1111... 111111111111111111111111111111111111mm111 ,,,,,,,,,,A111111 111111111 111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 II. 11111111 HIIII6IIIIIIII IIT 1111111111111111111 11111111111 1111. luuw 1 i1 000 111101011 p11IIIIl1i111111111111� 3.5 2.75 3.3 "1"1"1"1"1"1"1"1":1 111111111111101111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 W 'i1lp ""IIIIIIIIIIIII 111 1111111111 11111111111111, 111111111 „,„„ „„.,.uuuuuu ii 11111.117 PIII1un 4IIIII1uu 111111111111 ..lye 111 1.01 2.04 2.38 2.48 2.46 411 1.84 2.32 0.38 rwwww1111111111111111111111111 1.9 0.89 1.87 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111.....dllllllll6 111 11 ................ 3.37 1.86 0.6 IIIII1i1�u11i11111114 1...11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 4.57 0.91 1.87 �Ip1�11111111�1 2.51 2.51 2.13 1.86 1.51 000 N11111111111111gl1�ll tiiiil.2 uuuuuuuu.111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111112 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ,1,1,11.11111111111111111".111111 111111111111 816 Illllilll 6.04 000 III 1111 2.17 11111111111111111'101,,'111I 1111111 2.76 2.47 0.85 111 �11101.0 11111 5.43 0101 u1 uuuull 1 T 3 111 2.61 2.92 00 1110 11111 111111111111 11 " 111111111111111 2.7 1.93 2.63 11111..11. ,11111'.11 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.83 2.83 5.13 gluuu1111ouu1uuuul uuu 11111111111111111 1111111111 3.26 2.09 2.97 3.01 IIIIIIIIIII IIII�IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111 111111 11 1111111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 111111 1111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 111111 111 m'M 1111111111111111 1111111111111111111 I III'd11�19 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 i..... a .11.1„11.1.111111111.1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 "..II IIII1SIIIIII11., 11111111111 X11111"... 1.54 3.19 3.01 1.57 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111.... 11 111111111111 mmW uu11.1. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.04 2.85 4.72 1111111111 111111 11111111111 ww!'1.1111111I00 0000 3.11 2.32 2.15 4.08 1111111111111111111111111111 11111111111,1,1,1111111111111111111111 1111. 1111111111111111111111111111 1 1111 uuuw� 11111111111...11" . ®1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111.11...111111111111 i1�1 111 .....0000000.111111111111111111111111........ 1 loll 111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111. „I 1 01.1.1.1.1.1,1111 01uu��w 1111.11....111111111111111111 �.z. 1.4 2.86 3.1 1.11 'wW.1p'N.w!N'N1uw.W.wlw IIIIIIIIIII m 00011100 11 111°IIIIIlV11°19111111 2.4 4.23 uuuuu1111111111111111111111IIllqu.1; a uuuull 1111111111111111111111 2.69 1.94 2.23 3.39 IIIIIIIIIIIII 111.1III I 11' 11 p,11111i1, p Iii lomomol\lomo lolno61o6e' 1 innuoll111101mito "1I IIIIL111 IIS 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 1iiiiiiiiiiii 1111111111111 1 ' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1..11„„„„„„„„11�u111llip 111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 II 011111.'mw 1111111141 2.07 2.57 4.79 0.56 111111111111 11111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 '111111111 1""1111111 11111111111111111111111 111111.11 11111111111111111111111111.00 illlloW 2.03 3.34 -0.88 1.86 2.22 1.67 2.62 11111111111 1111111 1.111111 111 11111.11111112 111111111111111111111 11111111 I Ip1111111 11 i1112 2.74 2.34 1.69 2.3 3.22 3.27 I!�ptl101�101�101�101�10oV' p11lII11m!ulu!uV11�111V1111�111i1 1111111111�11Y1i11 ��1 �"IY111 �" i°i' 3.58 3.21 2.93 4.07 3.66 3.54 3.2 2.12 1.1 1.03 0.75 000 111 III1 11 111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 7 3 1 II a I' 6t:� 1111111111111111111111111111111111 2.67 3.15 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1111111 i ivu avoloorliolla 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Doi 11111111111111 5.71 3.34 2.13 2.4 �i 0;II11111� 100000000.0000,..100111 - 0.57 5.16 5.22 1.96 2.18 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111 llllllllll 1100 1111111111„10000,1 4.95 1.98 1.92 0000111 000111111110000111011111000000000 ,11 11111111111110 2.03 2.72 2.57 5.37 1.03 1.77 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .n0'0.1111111111 ..'011000000001111110 1.19 0.92 - 0.92 3.26 3.06 1111 Elul00000000111111111111111111111111 00000,,,,,,,1 111101111101111111111 1111 al1111111111 VIII 11 4.72 5.1 1.39 1.54 111111111,1 ued 2 2.14 1.85 1.26 1.29 -0.83 1111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 .1110011111111 11111111111 111111.100 111111111111111111111 11111111111111 ilii uumu1� 1.12 2.26 1111110 10 1:11 1 1111111111 0000000000.00 100000 1111111111111111111100.111111111110.100....01000000.1100.0111110 Table 7-3. Nueces County Historical PHDI Values (1948 - 2017) (cont.) 1 1a �� �� 10 1�i o �� a � o� o � �� u10 o ���� 1 �� 1» 1»i 11a� � � �� oft � � � " � u ti \ �1\ X01 00 11.111111111 \ 11 ,III 111 110 .11110011111 \\\\111110101 /11/011101 \ �1 .11111011111 �111� \ 1011 X11 1 1\�0�1 1 111 0 110, 111 111111 0 1011 1 \ 1 1 110 \ 0 � �II� � .. m 1 m 0 � y., �� � � An � . �� um ��7� An ,u,. �� , , An An � ��, �1 11 � �� �� � l ( �� ���"��`��`��`��`��`����������������������������o� 1����11��0�����`1"1"�iia�`I`1V`i����a��a�`1�i�����"1`i�����o����������„�����i�1�Ihi����,N1iii0��i�01��������oi�`�`�11\0\�������� m0�\\�,0\�������o��`\`I��������i����```i�������������ol����������������������010\1`0`���\��`���`����\���\����������������� `�111ii`ii olilam�1111J J uu IIII .II 1.71 �1�11om1111i0iiiii� 1.ett,,mm �r,1„^� 2.39 1.9 1.9 2.42 2.7 2.68 1.76 1.36 0.81 ull 2.46 2.27 2.59 2.33 3.63 3.61 3.04 4.74 4.12 3.67 3.69 2.87 1.21 0.75 0.66 -0.43 2.59 1.89 1.45 0.87 0.57 -0.76 0.95 1.41 1.31 1.43 0.79 -0.33 -0.74 uu -0.74 -0.81 1.82 2.92 2.55 2.38 2.55 2.83 01010101010101010101010100000000000000010111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 .1111111111111 10101111111111111111111111 111111 plilliq 00000000000000111111111111111000000000000000 Ipluu11111111100""111001.1111111111111111 "111111111111 MTV 11���1�1ia11i111mi0a11m lit ;$111: �1111 u �1\�111o1>r11�111101111p1 8111111�11111�1111V lill ��1\�111o1>r11�11110111111 � � ti,W3 ��" Ptib 111118111111111�11111�111 112"\\E aia111"\\E �1�11om�11�11i�p1�i1!! wpm �1����1i1m11i�m1�ii�a1 ��1�11om�11�1mu1iiialam i�1����1ii1�i��1��ia���o�1��1\� �1�111om�11�1mgq�iiiil ���1�1���1111��1m1���m v. nail ��i�1'`1oi�11�1mm111u�mi�1 � m�i1��a���11��°1 t 1�i�10o1a��a1im111�ii 0 m��1��a��i1l��ii1 ���01 �i�10o1a��a1im1111uui1 � e uo uo 4�� m1�11���1�01111�11110l ������11mm11����11����1 itir����iiill��oi1 i���iiil���o�1 11i°� ����ii1a1111J TIT"' (11111�1��1111�111 it `,11,�`11�I11� 1`111111 10.1111111111000111.100001100..........0000010 000 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1110 111 1 000 011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1011 11111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 9 III „ 111 I. 111111111111111111111111 0111111111111 n.1'111'1'1,11 1101 3.28 1.99 1.86 2.14 1.63 ul1111 l 111100111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111000 11111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 10000100111111111111111 3.7 1.7 1.45 1.95 0.88 110101010101 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00000.„., .11111111111 4.38 1.96 1.99 3.13 011 II 1111111010100000000000100 0 1111111111111111111111 1.07 1.21 1.66 111111111111111111111111111111111111111a11.111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111010.11111111111101010101010 1.61 1.75 0.08 .1.0 010000000000 110101110 010000000000 0000 000.1,1110. 1.04 1.47 0.23 ............111111111111111110.01111111 111111111,111111111111111111 ',...00001010101011111 uV 111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 4.78 2.24 2.54 2.68 10011000111010111111111111111001111000100000000001 111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00 1 0.57 1.51 0.09 -0.68 1.73 1.04 1.34 1.07 2 1.16 0.96 0.83 001111010.11111111111 11111111111 10,111111 ,..01,100 01 '11111111111111 1111111111 11111111111111111 11111111111 Ill, 0.11 00 uu 1111 u ""10111111111100001,111"000000 2.68 3.84 2.62 4.16 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2.48 3.2 2.32 5.17 u!III 111111 1.87 2.58 2.83 4.4 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.92 1.9 1.65 11111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 1111111 01 i loll 11111111111111 1111111111111111110000000 - 0.74 4.28 4.08 0.64 1.7 - 0.91 111111111 I1u111 11 ul 111111111111111111111111111111111111101 000000000000000000011,011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111000000000111110101010101010100011010 Illlu 01010101010 1.31 1.21 0.91 0.8 1.11 hili ,u1u 2.07 0000101010.00.10 11llllilllllul 1111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuuuuu 1.21 3.66 2.96 0.83 1.27 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111 11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00 11111111111111111000. 111111111111 1.35 II 0.1.0111111111 11111111111...1.000 11111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 0.76 2.56 2.22 1.47 2.24 0000101100 11111111111111111111111111111111111 111.11111 -0.69 3.15 1.62 0.85 2.79 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000011000000000 1.73 2.15 2.29 3.86 1010101010101010101010101011,111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 1.31 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0.84 1.69 0.66 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0000000000. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII r� 2.32 2.61 2.27 2.57 2.28 10101010101010101010110110 it010000111111111111111 1.61 1.87 1.41 1.33 1.63 1.29 - 0.61 0.75 1.62 1.29 0.76 0111111111111111111111111111 11110 II 1111111111111111111111111 u 1111111111111111111111111 �m9 2.93 2.86 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00 .00.01010101010 11111111111111111 Il 1111111 1111111111111111 111111 111111111111111111111111 11, 111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111 111111111111111111110m uuuuu 1'� ',1111,1,!,11111111111111 -0.63 '1111 I 0.55 0.02 0.92 2.87 1.87 2.21 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111110100110110010000 hill111 1111111 IIIII1�11111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 1 011 111111111111111111111111011111111,"1 11111111111111 -0.72 1.26 1.09 1.32 11 uuu�111111111111111 11'1111 111' 1111111111 11111,111111111101111111111111111 2.38 1.57 0.83 0.85 11111111111111111111110000000000000111000000,00,00 111111111111 000000000000011111111111111000000000000000 0 111111111111 111111111111111 2.22 1.99 -0.43 1111 wl' 0000000000000000000000000000000000100001110001110110000000000 2.81 2.13 2.2 1.69 0.77 0.76 0.8 0.18 4.72 5.4 4.79 3.85 3.07 2.2 101000011 uu111u1�u1�u1 � 1.95 2.58 1.84 1.28 0.57 111111111 011111 IIII i1i1 1111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 7 4 1 If" a 1111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Table 7-3. Nueces County Historical PHDI Values (1948 - 2017) (cont.) �i ���� o �� � ii � oi»I �,� iii �i� oa ��� � � � 110�0111o��11ti ii � i i 1 1 11 \1\ X111 00 \ \\0\\\\� � 1 11 ,III 10 1111 II IIIQIIIII \\\11111111\11��\1�\\\1�1\1�1 1 �\0� 1111111111\\�alll\\ 10 1 1 e\ 1 1 1 1.111 4 111 1 1 I 1 111 ( � � � � 1 ( 1 w � Att � ., w Ilm �a�� Att ,u w , ,Att Att 1\\1\\\\\��0\\��\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\0000\���,���,�����,��,�1,���,� 1�,1,��,��,1,�„��,�y�,��"���1,�`y\���,���,���,�` �,,,�����1�,��,�`�,��,�1��,���,�`��\\\\ rtn rt wl�lil�a1�1�1�1i�����ii� ooll�a000� 1v1i�111o11���11����ii1 111111\\I1111�11 �gI111P 000000000000,00,0000,0 010101010100' 1°11111111111111111111111 00,00,00,00,00,0000 101011101001111100011110,000,000, 1111111111111111111111111 1111111 111111111111 0 0:11111111110 '1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1111111111;111' 11111111111 11111111111111 111111'1'111111111111111111 11111111111 2.25 2.3 1.53 2.12 3.66 2.88 4.25 3.51 3.06 2.45 2.97 2.19 1.67 0.9 111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00.1.111.11,111111111111 w,111111111111111111111111111 uWw' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 1111111111IIIP1111111111111 111 111111111111 1111111111111111 D1f, 01101010101010101010001 000,000, 110,11 11111111111 w 111111 ,.:111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIwVwwww llllllllllllllllllll 000000000000 IIIIII uul lil 011111111 ®II' 1111111111111111111111 000010 0000' mm �w 1111111111111111 II 1111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 1110,1 iiii I11:11 Moll 01101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101 01111111 II 111111111111111111111111, 111111111 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 I 11111111111 11111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 000000000000 00000000000000001100000 11111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, .11,1 11 1,1,1 ,111111111111111 10000011.01,111111111111 111111111111111 w 111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2.21 3.55 6.22 5.63 5.21 4.55 3.6 2.97 2.66 2.01 1.88 1.14 2.31 2.47 2.82 2.46 1.64 1.52 0.92 .111111111111111111 0001111111111111111011111110111111111110000001 1th 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of months of drought in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. A drought may cover several jurisdictions; however, a drought event is recorded for the jurisdiction based on the levels of severity and the length in time of each occurrence. Table 7-3 provides a general overview of drought severity, probability, and return interval. Probability for future drought events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 7-3. Nueces County Drought Probability �� `�� o a1 � oo11a � 1i� iii oo� 1�o�v ���» 1 a ��» I \ \ 010 a� 11111 11 1 01 1 11 0 11 1 1 11 \ 1 01 11 01 11 1 1 1 1 \11\�10 � 11 00\1 �\ ,11111 11 II 1�1\0\�� 1111 �1\ 0 �l 111111 001 11 1\111 11 111111 �0\����110� 1\l\111�1� \ 00111110\11�11�0�11�1 � �\�\\\\1\� 111\1�ti11\��1 ,\\ 11\�1�1111111\1�1 ,11111.\010\ 1�111ti1111111� ,, N �� ..., AI w, �: 9. ,����„ 9 \ AI ,. AI ,����, 4tt � ,.. �. N- ttk�,.. tt� 9 9 �,. 9. ,����, 4tt ,�� w��� � \ AI ,����„ � ,. \ 11111`����1��`��`111`1�111�`��������11���`1�111�11���\I�1���1����������\�., 11111`���11111�1�11��11��1���`�11�1�11�1�11�I�11�\��1��111�1�'�1��1�11�1�111�1������I �1I�d11111111`�� 11111`��`11111,1�`1�1���1��1��\��1�111�1�1�`111�11�1��1�1���'����1�111111�11�11�1� Incipient Drought Mild Drought Moderate Drought Severe Drought Extreme Drought 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% 20 years 5 years 7 years 13 years 50 years Impact Common effects of drought include crop failure, water supply shortages, and fish and wildlife mortality. There is very low risk of loss of life or damage to structures associated with drought. Droughts may cause water shortages and require regulators to enact water rationing. The impacts of drought tend to be felt most by agriculture and related industries. Droughts can damage crops and pastoral lands and in severe cases, droughts may kill Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 7 5 1 If" ,n trees and cause loss of livestock. Dead vegetation from drought can serve as fuel for wildfires. Crop insurance is purchased by agricultural producers such as farmers and ranchers to protect their investment in the event of natural disaster like drought, hail, or flood. The extent of crop loss due to drought occurrences is difficult to quantify because a drought during a growing season can impact the next two years of crop production. Documentation of agricultural losses due to drought is typically filed by the land owner directly with the policy holder and is not a matter of public record. For this reason, historical crop damages caused by drought is not quantified herein. Economic impacts of droughts may be complex and far ranging. Water is required to produce many goods and services. If impacts are felt in basal levels of supply chains there is potential for measurable downstream effects. The impacts of a drought may be felt by many interconnected industries and may reach well beyond the temporal or spatial extents of the drought. The latest major drought on record was the 2011 Texas Drought which had a total direct cost of agricultural loss estimated at $5.2 billion with an estimated $3.5 billion in indirect cost for a total of $8.7 billion in losses state wide. Some of this cost is associated to the decreased park attendance, demanding $4.6 million just to keep parks open to the public1 Vulnerability Communities with a greater proportion of crop area may be more vulnerable to the economic impacts of drought. Cropland was calculated by using the 2011 National Land Cover Dataset, published in 2015. This data is the most recent data of its type. Droughts may potentiate the effects of other hazards. For example, droughts may remove water from vegetation, rendering areas more vulnerable to wildfires. Wildfire hazards are discussed elsewhere in this plan. 1 Testimony at TWDB Work Session Meeting (October 21, 2014) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 6 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Drought Hazard SSSSSSEENSSS\S\ County Wide (Unincorporated ISSSSS.Sttta\SnS ISSSSSSIZIMICEIIMRSSSSSI 112111t1101 11 11 11111 1111@1 1 111111���1111\11�1111�1�1 11VII 111 1 101111 X1111111. 111 1 DO 100�11�0 � 11 11Ilio /1111111 "` 1 1\ 11 Il 1 1 , 1 11 1 111 �1111�1�11 �i���Im� 1\111\t1U1\\1\�111�11\1\l\1\11 357 i��� �i�i�u5 ii aU �aa��u � ���� ���i�u5 ii aU �aa��u. 7767aa��u.V U111 }�U U111 }�U 0 11 11 �1i\@1 1� 111 � 1i111�a �o��ool ��,� � ��il 11� 1�1� ���� � 11` 1111�¶.��.....1 �o1�i11��i��11 �II` 111II1�11� 1 111 111`,. 111111 �`1 11111�>,1 11 1111 X11 111111111\1111\1111\II`��\��\������\�1�11\111\1�11�� emu, »���»o� �m��.;�;,�a�i,�,y��n�' mu„» �mi� ma�'.�;,������,0�1 m�»��,�110»� m��,���,ti,\l1'itl»� 164 113 63 � oil N\„:7,,,\,\\N".\,,s\nliar. k i. Ire\ 51,97\i",11,‘,„ \s\ as444 , . ,,,,,,,,, ,1,,, aafa�awvsSi 15 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% ISSSSS% I\SSIEMMMM\SSSSWS\SW................................ Values of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. Vr' =iTMia�� ISISS.S1MrtIEER.SSSS 312,734.7 73.77% *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 7 1 If” ,n 11 City of Aqua Dulce Drought Hazard SSSSS111ZNSS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.1t.S\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPlraISSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 ISISISSIM.......................................:....................................................................11\\ N PISS "Ill " "1" " " I 11 111% 111"\)1.\\ ‘111, int\ ‘1111.."' 11711A\1„;„\%\,,t. INA \ \I \ AtINit‘A. .41A t„„tli5% 46% 21% 15% 8% 2% ISS.I.WS.122211,121ISISWSISISNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. SSSSSSEZZMSSSS ISSSSSMMZEMSS SSSSSNMSSSSSS 2.45 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 1.12% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 8 1 If" a City of Bishop Drought Hazard City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\......................................................................:....................................................................is= ;',";11, \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnll\SS\S.S‘S\SSSNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 35.57 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 35.57% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 9 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Drought Hazard StaltrESSIS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\......................................................................:....................................................................is= ;',";11, \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnll\SS\S.S‘S\SSSNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 24632.44 7.64% *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 10 1 If" a City of Driscoll Drought Hazard StaltrESSIS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ '1111r"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\.......................................................................:....................................................................is= \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnnl.SS\S.S‘S\SSSN��Values of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 464.67 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 62.4% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 11 1 If" a City of Petronila Drought Hazard StaltrESSIS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ '1111r"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\......................................................................:....................................................................is= ;',";11, \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnll\SS\S.S‘S\SSSNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 926.66 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 79.36% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 12 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Drought Hazard 1 y 1.1 1 4 ���`�`��`����`�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������„,��1,,,�„h,�I�i��,�,”��il,�,,,,���,h,,,�������`��`���`���`������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 357 City Wide � 1 » \ �11�11� IV111Qdd'l�VI �11�t��� 111111111\11�1.1 \111`1\\I fly � �1 i ISMS 1111\11\\tA%%\\WlrgttNlln1"\SW\`� % » \1 ,1,,\\natu \11.11l 39 164 113 63 isan\axm\AmtFras\m\m\ ss." - r -..l\ \• 15 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% 11111 MIN 111 Not Applicable; City of Port Aransas does not have crop or pasture land within its jurisdiction. ISSISSEESSIS 0 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 0% Port Aransas lacks crop or pasture lands. However, there are facilities within the jurisdiction that may be vulnerable to drought. Port Aransas has a significant tourism industry. If water restrictions are in place, that may negatively impact the operations of these facilities. While drought is not likely to directly impact tourism, it may lead to indirect economic impacts if drought -related water restrictions lead to facility interruptions. A human being can only survive a few days without water. When discussing the very young, the very old, or the ill, the timeframe can be even shorter. About 23% of the population of Port Aransas is above the age of 65. About 2.4% of the population is below age 5. In total, 25.5% of the population may be vulnerable to drought based upon age- related characteristics. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 13 1 If" ,n City of Robstown Drought Hazard SSSSS111ZNSS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.1t.S\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPlraISSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 ISISISSIM.......................................:....................................................................11\\ N PISS "Ill " "1" " " I 11 111% 111"\)1.\\ ‘111, int\ 411,1\:"' 11711A\)„,;.„VL,IAA \ 1 \ %Au.41A t„„tti5% 46% 21% 15% 8% 2% ISS.I.WS.122211,121ISISWSISISNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. SSSSSSEZZMSSSS ISSSSSMMZEMSS SSSSSNMSSSSSS 6580.37 66.32% *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 14 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Drought Hazard SS\SttrMNSSSS\ 11111110�11111111111111171 11 1 111111�\111�1�1\�111171� 11 1 1,1 X1\01111 X1111111. 1111 X11 DO `�i 100�11�� � 11 111 hal\\ 11 "` 11 1 1\`� 1 X11 10 \�11 �11�11 �i�� �m� h�hh`1hh\\h`�hhhh�h�h��\\hh Jurisdiction Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.1t.S\ Illr" Mr"IIISS\S\S";12qPllraISSSW 71; lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 ss r"\N"sssssm"F""m""ttms‘s‘llssl ur \. ia\ ‘.t4,1,r1 nsS�S1 � r � a,S{� �i r�i: �� �,�� �'r ;tm„m„, � ,46% 8% 5% 21% 15% AUVAIS Not Applicable; PCCA does not have crop or pasture land within its jurisdiction. 2% 11112171 ISSISSIZEMISS SSSSVIMSSSSS 0 0% While PCCA lacks crop or pasture lands, there are facilities within the jurisdiction that may be vulnerable to drought. Numerous facilities within PCCA use open-air bodies of water in their operations. These facilities may be vulnerable to drought. These facilities include but are not limited to Flint Hills Resources LP, Citgo, Elementis Chromium LP, Valero Refining Co, and Koch Carbon Inc. While the ways in which these facilities use water resources varies, what remains constant is the fact that an interruption in water resources would result in negative economic impacts for these facilities. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 15 1 If" ,n 1,111911,l iii � o� I�l I i�i iii �i Windstorms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorms Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Windstorms Hazard 19 City of Bishop Windstorms Hazard 21 City of Corpus Christi Windstorms Hazard 23 City of Driscoll Windstorms Hazard 25 City of Petronila Windstorms Hazards 26 City of Port Aransas Windstorms Hazard 29 City of Robstown Windstorms Hazard 31 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorms Hazard 33 Windstorms Hazard Overview Description A windstorm is a storm with high winds or violent gusts with little or no rain. The windstorm hazard excludes extreme wind events that occur with other wind -related natural hazards such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornados which are addressed elsewhere in this plan. Location Windstorms do not have any specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to windstorm activity. According to FEMA Wind Zones in the United States, Nueces County is located in Wind Zone III, associated to winds as high as 200 mph. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 1 1 If" ,n Figure 8-1. FEMA Wind Zones in the United States t 8 ZOU .THE UNITE STAT.' /' IN 00 11100 0000, ,.III I i uuioi 00 00 19401019,101, 1111111 ho opoo EE ESKA or ^io��,wyg ��u4��rM iJ//�J NACKM, WWW �U v d M Srts liWA NrP31160MW 0,661 ZONE ZONE Ef wohp 111 EOi1 ',SIV ONEEi OW zoo NUECES COUNTY poonloolloolovoloolo The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) was established under the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) by the Texas Legislature in 1971 following Hurricane Celia. TWIA provides windstorm and hail insurance along the Texas seacoast. Recommended design and inspection requirements for structures along the coast have been developed by TDI based on historical damages. Three designated catastrophe areas have been defined for Nueces County. Designated catastrophe areas are established for territories subject to unusually frequent and severe damage resulting from windstorm or hailstorms. Designated catastrophe areas for Nueces County include: Seaward, Inland I, and Inland II. Adopted design wind speeds for these designated catastrophe areas are shown in Figure 8-2 and defined below: • Seaward: 130 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland I: 120 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland II: 110 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 2 1 If" ,n Figure 8-2. TDI Designated Catastrophe Areas Portland Y ■ Corpus Christi 011 Driscoll Chapman Ranch w Extent Bishop Inland II Inland I Port Aransas Seaward Windstorms extent is defined using the Beaufort Wind Scale. Table 8-1 summarizes the Beaufort Wind Scale. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 3 1 P a • 0 1 1\ a Ott \1111\ 1\ 1 Less than 1 1 1-3 2 4-6 Light Breeze 3 7-10 Gentle Breeze 4 11-16 5 17-21 Fresh Breeze 6 22-27 Strong Breeze 7 28-33 Near Gale 8 34-40 Gale Table 8-1. Beaufort Wind Scale "":1)1\\ • Calm Light Air Moderate Breeze 9 41-47 Strong Gale 10 48-55 Storm 11 56-63 Violent Storm 12 64+ Hurricane Source: www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/torna a 1 4k 4k 1P Ott ` im 1�. II �'.`^ t N ��������01����0\�0�1�����`���������������� „�„��,,, ���� ��4��,,,,\,;,,��„��,a„1;,a��1�,,,�,,,,,,�,,,,\a„� �,,a,�,,,a�a,��\\,,,a�,l,;,,a,,,'��„�”,a,\,,,,�,,,,a„�,,,�,,;,��1111111\11����1`���������������������������� 11X0111�010�11y,;,;°;;;;MM°;;°„1�\\I11�1\111�1��1�����\1111X0111�010�11���;°~"�°y;»M�1110111��1��0��� Sea surface smooth and mirror- like Scaly ripples, no foam crests Small wavelets, crests glassy, no breaking Large wavelets, crests begin to break, scattered whitecaps Small waves 1-4 ft. becoming longer, numerous whitecaps Moderate waves 4-8 ft. taking longer form, many whitecaps, some spray Larger waves 8-13 ft., whitecaps common, more spray Sea heaps up, waves 13-19 ft., white foam streaks off breakers Moderately high (18-25 ft.) waves of greater length, edges of crests begin to break into spindrift, foam blown in streaks High waves (23-32 ft.), sea begins to roll, dense streaks of foam, spray may reduce visibility Very high waves (29-41 ft.) with overhanging crests, sea white with densely blown foam, heavy rolling, lowered visibility Exceptionally high (37-52 ft.) waves, foam patches cover sea, visibility more reduced Air filled with foam, waves over 45 ft., sea completely white with driving spray, visibility greatly reduced do/beaufort.html Calm, smoke rises vertically Smoke drift indicates wind direction, still wind vanes Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, vanes begin to move Leaves and small twigs constantly moving, light flags extended Dust, leaves, and loose paper lifted, small tree branches move Small trees in leaf begin to sway Larger tree branches moving, whistling in wires Whole trees moving, resistance felt walking against wind Twigs breaking off trees, generally impedes progress Slight structural damage occurs, slate blows off roofs Seldom experienced on land, trees broken or uprooted, "considerable structural damage” Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 Occurrences Windstorms can occur at any time of year but they are typically more common during the spring and early summer. In Nueces County from 1956 — 2016, 69% of all windstorms took place between the months of March and June. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Storm Prediction Center, Nueces County has experienced 209 (recorded) windstorm events over the course of the record period from 9/26/1956 to 3/19/2016 (60 years). Table 8-2 includes a summary of windstorm events from 1950 to 2006, categorizing the events by wind speed. Table 8-3 includes a comprehensive list of all windstorm events on record within Nueces County. Historical windstorm events are mapped for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 8-2. Historical Windstorm Occurrence Summary, 1956-2016 "rt 209 SSSSSSIIIIEIRMIRBISRISSSII 51 94 18 24 7 10 5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 5 1 P a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20161 Unincorporated Nueces County Robstown 10/4/1956 53 0 0 $0 $0 Robstown 10/4/1956 60 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 4/20/1957 68 0 0 $0 $0 County Robstown 4/27/1957 Unknown 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/1/1957 62 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/1/1962 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/31/1964 65 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 2/6/1967 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/20/1967 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 5/11/1968 61 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 11/29/196 Unknown $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 11/26/196 67 0 0 $0 $0 County 9 Corpus Christi 1/6/1970 50 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 1/9/1970 57 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 6/1/1970 64 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/10/1971 0 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 9/10/1971 60 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/2/1972 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/5/1973 52 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 5/1/1974 Unknown 0 0 $0 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 5/1/1974 52 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 5/26/1974 54 0 0 $0 $0 111111•0t11`111 „litt 9/26/1956 54 0 0 !N,\\‘‘`‘N \\IF\ mat so so 1 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 6 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20162 (cont.) Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Bishop Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi AtA 6/10/1975 50 6/10/1975 56 7/15/1975 Unknown 8/5/1975 54 4/21/1979 Unknown 4/21/1979 Unknown Unknown Unknown 54 70 Unknown 58 80 80 51 4/12/1980 5/19/1980 5/21/1980 5/21/1980 5/22/1980 8/10/1980 8/10/1980 8/10/1980 7/11/1981 10/31/198 1 5/12/1982 5/12/1982 5/12/1982 6/6/1983 10/7/1984 60 Unknown Unknown 51 Unknown Unknown 10/7/1984 Unknown 5/8/1985 Unknown 5/21/1985 52 5/17/1986 Unknown 2 NOAA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 so so so so so "V so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20163 (cont.) Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Port Aransas Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Corpus Christi \\\ \A 8/21/1986 Unknown 0 0 8/21/1986 Unknown 0 0 8/21/1986 Unknown 0 0 8/21/1986 64 0 0 2/27/1987 52 0 0 11/16/1987 52 0 0 4/29/1988 Unknown 0 0 4/29/1988 54 0 0 4/29/1988 Unknown 0 0 6/3/1988 Unknown 0 0 4/29/1989 Unknown 0 0 2/21/1990 50 0 0 3/28/1991 Unknown 0 0 3/28/1991 Unknown 0 0 5/8/1991 Unknown 0 0 5/8/1991 54 0 0 5/8/1991 54 0 0 3/3/1992 Unknown 0 0 3/3/1992 Unknown 0 0 4/17/1992 Unknown 0 0 5/5/1993 50 0 0 5/5/1993 50 0 0 5/10/1993 Unknown 0 0 5/10/1993 Unknown 0 0 9/26/1993 Unknown 0 0 3 NOAA 111111111!kl so so so so so so $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 so so so so so so so so so so so so so $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 so so so so so so $4,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 $o $o $o $o $5,000 8 10", a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20164 (cont.) Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Port Aransas Unincorporated Nueces County Robstown Corpus Christi Port Aransas Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 4/15/1994 4/11/1995 5/30/1995 5/11/1996 9/20/1996 11/24/1996 11/24/1996 11/24/1996 5/9/1997 5/9/1997 6/17/1997 6/17/1997 2/12/1998 6/15/1998 8/14/1998 3/28/1999 5/12/1999 5/12/1999 5/18/1999 5/18/1999 3/14/2000 3/14/2000 3/14/2000 6/7/2001 4NOAA A01 58 58 60 52 60 60 60 70 50 60 60 50 52 65 60 50 50 59 50 60 55 65 68 60 \\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 $5,000 $3,000,000 $30,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so so so so so so so so so so $100,000 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $5,500,000 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $5,500,000 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20165 (cont.) Corpus Christi 9/9/2001 50 Corpus Christi 9/9/2001 50 Corpus Christi 5/17/2002 50 0 Unincorporated Nueces 5/17/2002 50 0 0 County Bishop 5/29/2002 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/29/2002 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/29/2002 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/29/2002 57 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 10/23/2002 59 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 2/15/2003 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 2/15/2003 50 0 0 $0 Corpus Christi 3/26/2003 50 0 0 $0 $0 Port Aransas 9/12/2003 50 0 0 $0 $0 Port Aransas 10/25/2003 60 0 0 $0 $0 Robstown 5/1/2004 52 0 0 $100,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/19/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 3/19/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 5/8/2005 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/8/2005 60 0 0 $0 $0 Robstown 5/29/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 11/15/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 3/28/2006 51 0 0 $0 $0 Bishop 5/14/2006 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/14/2006 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/26/2006 50 0 0 $2,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/26/2006 50 0 0 $2,000 $0 0 0 0 0 0 tAt so so so $0 ittit so so so $0 5 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 10 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20166 (cont.) Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County 6/26/2006 50 6/30/2006 50 6/5/2007 65 tAt ittit 0 0 $3,000 $0 0 0 $45,000 $0 0 0 $40,000 $0 Port Aransas 10/19/2007 54 0 0 $50,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/6/2008 54 0 0 $50,000 $0 Bishop 3/10/2008 52 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/10/2008 58 0 0 $50,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/10/2008 59 0 0 $50,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 3/18/2008 52 0 0 $5,000 $0 County Corpus Christi 8/28/2009 50 0 0 $10,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 9/10/2009 52 $10,000 $0 County Robstown 9/10/2009 52 $10,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 10/9/2009 56 0 0 $10,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 10/26/2009 61 0 0 $20,000 $0 County Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 56 0 6 $1,000,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 58 0 0 $700,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 70 0 0 $100,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 78 0 0 $250,000 $0 Driscoll 6/2/2010 52 0 0 $100,000 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 51 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 60 0 0 $500,000 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 70 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 78 0 0 $700,000 $0 Driscoll 1/9/2011 52 0 0 $0 $0 6 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 11 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-2016' (cont.) Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Robstown Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County 1/9/2011 8/25/2011 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 9/29/2011 3/20/2012 3/20/2012 3/29/2012 3/29/2012 4/2/2012 5/8/2012 5/8/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 NOAA AtA 70 78 51 52 52 52 52 50 50 50 61 52 50 52 52 52 52 65 70 70 52 \\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \A 0 0 0 0 111 1 ttiti $500,000 $500,000 $1,000 $5,000 so so so so 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 $30,000 0 $0 $0 0 $50,000 0 $1,000,000 0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 121 If"ai Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20168 (cont.) Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County tAt ittit 5/10/2012 52 $0 $0 5/10/2012 70 0 0 $100,000 $100,000 5/10/2012 70 $1,000,000 $100,000 Robstown 5/10/2012 52 0 0 $25,000 $0 Corpus Christi 11/3/2012 53 0 0 $25,000 $0 Corpus Christi 11/3/2012 59 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 11/3/2012 61 0 0 $30,000 $0 Port Aransas 11/3/2012 53 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/7/2013 50 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/30/2013 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 9/2/2013 50 0 0 $2,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 4/4/2014 52 0 0 $10,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 4/12/2015 50 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 51 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 52 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 54 0 0 $5,000 $0 Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 55 0 0 $500,000 $0 Driscoll 4/14/2015 56 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 4/22/2015 52 0 0 $10,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 4/22/2015 61 0 0 $10,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 4/22/2015 61 0 0 $3,000,000 $0 County Corpus Christi 5/12/2015 51 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/12/2015 52 0 0 $100,000 $0 8 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 13 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20169 (cont.) 11� 1 1 1F 011111\11� 1 1 \‘. Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Agua Dulce Bishop Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Driscoll Driscoll Unincorporated Nueces County Petronila Robstown Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County 5/12/2015 5/15/2015 5/15/2015 5/15/2015 5/24/2015 7/31/2015 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 �111� 1 1111»1111 1111 ��H���,���il���,„�`�����„�,� 111111” 57 52 51 56 52 50 61 56 59 61 68 61 61 3/18/2016 65 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/19/2016 61 52 61 3/19/2016 55 \\I 0 0 \A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \l 111\�WE so $20,000 $100,000 $100,000 $10,000 $30,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $2,000 $4,300,000 $100,000 $60,000 so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so $25,000 $0 $10,000 so so so so so Table 8-4 Nueces County Windstorm -Related Disaster Declarations ruM 111 Whit 1439 1709 4223 11/5/2002 6/29/2007 5/29/2015 9 NOAA 1) 111 11 11 0111 11 l� 10/24/2002 6/16/2007 5/4/2015 1111,10\011 1� 1 11110.1111111 1110 0 X11 � 1 tow. „ An 11/15/2002 8/3/2007 6/23/2015 X10 $57,974,742 $25,706,394 $156,797,067 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 14 1 If” a 0 Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of windstorm events in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. Note, historical events are documented as a function of the path of the storm. A windstorm may travel over several jurisdictions; consequently, the windstorm event is recorded for all jurisdictions through which the windstorm passed. Probability for future windstorm events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Impact Windstorm impacts are documented by the number of deaths, injuries, property damage, and crop damage. Table 8-4 provides a summary of impacts for Nueces County as a whole. Impacts to the county and participating jurisdictions is documented in the following sections. Table 8-5. Historical Windstorm Impacts Summary, 1956-2016 209 0 6 $72,872,000 An".1 ti.NV $410,000 In addition to the direct, historical impacts in Table 8-5, vulnerable assets and potential maximum impacts are listed in the jurisdictional tables. Because the impacts of windstorms are closely tied to the extent of the event and windstorms are expected to be evenly distributed throughout the planning area, maximum impacts are listed in the jurisdictional tables. Fortunately, it is unlikely that a worst case scenario windstorm would ever take place and maximize damages. Windstorms can cause indirect impacts by damaging power lines and other above -ground utilities. Crop losses and population displacement from housing damage could cause additional economic losses. Vulnerability Windstorms often cross -jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in and around Nueces County are exposed to windstorm hazard and are at potential risk of impact. The damage caused by a windstorm is typically a result of high wind velocity and wind-blown debris. Vulnerability of humans and property is difficult to evaluate given that windstorm form at different strengths and in random locations. Property damage is typically most significant for structures of light construction. Three types of structures are more likely to suffer damage: manufactured Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 15 1 P a homes, homes on crawlspaces (more susceptible to lift), and buildings with large spans, such as shopping malls, gymnasiums, and factories. Vulnerability is defined for the county and participating jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 16 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorms Hazard ISSISSI1 MISSS.S\ ISISIZI ISMS.M SIVE211111\alal County Wide (Unincorporated Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 ‘tytt \0001\\\0\00 11111 \0001\\1111 111 \ \\\\ 11 110 0\\\ 11 11 D \\ \ 1 11 VIZ ea`\"� `�1� `��\ 111 45 10 19 2 11,111111 8 3 3 0 slssstEca AMA NIAA tk\t‘ \\a AMM. 45 0 0 $11,335,000 $200,000 IMEEK 1 01 011 01 1\ 0 01 11 1111211 0 �\1 1 00\ 1\1\\1\ 1\1 101 111)111 1111. �10101011�0101101�1�1� ���0\\ ��1�111�h� 10111 ���0�0�11\ 1 011 � , 1, ,�. � \ ,, � .� . ��11���1���1���������1����1`�������,����1���0��������1��������� 9/26/1956 to 75% 45 3/19/2016 60 0 �0110�1011111111111�1��1�1111,11111011\11111 l�\Illl\111�111� 5 \ 1 1 � 1 \ 0 �01��1���1�1��1����1���������������������������������������������������������������,,,,,,,,�,,,��,�`I„��,,,,,�,,,IIIb,,,,�,,,,,,�1�,,�1��„���„��1���1���\��1���1�������������������������������������������������������������������� ,1111 1111 11 1 1111 �„ 111 1 \ 11111111 Q1 011\111111 l) 1 0 \ 1 (9 \ \ 1 IIIIIIIQ111111111��1111111 111 (1111..._. 1 IIII111111�11 \O1\10 � ...., . 111 \ 11 1�\1 �1 � 1 �1 \ 111� 1 1 1 1 1111111 ���.11111 1,. 111 \I 1 \1 � \m 11 11 11 ��������01�����������„I`��„��„�,�,���„�,1���„��1,,,�„���,,,�1,��1�„1111;„������������������������������ ��������01��������������0�����,,,,,�„��„�,�,���„��,,,?;�1,�0„��11,,,1����������`�������������������0�� 11111 1 u 1111�1�11�� . 111 1�1 o a as 1� 11 1�1 0�� 1 00 11� 11 0 1 tui1 \ of 1 100111\00111�1100\01�11.11 0��\\.�\o��o\��.ti1 � 0�1\�\00\00� � Ilulool \\1111\\1 �»\\\\\1 \\ 1 1 X11111 � 10\\ � 1 1 �� 1 1 , \ ��11�11��,�,,,�,,,��„�,,,��„�,,,�`�,,,�,,,�,,,�,�1,,,�����11�11�01�,,,111,,,�,,,��1,�,��1,,,�1„��”��,1��,,,������1��1\��11�11�01����1�„�I,,,�1�1,,�,,,,�����10�1����1\��11�11�01����1���,,,,,,�,�,,,,�1,,,��1�010111��1�1`11 15,274 $373,034,606 $487,429,634 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 345,880.3 $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 8 17 1 If” ,n Figure 8-3. Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorm Events 1111111,11f1,1111,fffIll 0111111111111111 001 ,u It 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .wIYA'i: id�i �r u a iuN °o y 'c t' �'tnl�4u Ilii dulVW V 1 yoyolo11111111000000 y1111111111111111111111111111111loul10o .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000,000000000000000011111111111111111111111111 nommonoWfl M I���I�� VIII'(,0 000 0011000000 0000000000,000) NIVs nomiVItIIVIIIpIII'�I ull1puufl 111111 111111111111,1„1„1 1111 1111111111 lI oll ,111111,1,V,11,,111,,,,11'111'111111,',111 atm Action 6'ari awArcro NlN '.,e$, County uiuw,n�,+MpF ��.dl'�4 a,r 0 0 N,400.00 i0tCdr Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 8 18111 ndrm City of Agua Dulce Windstorms Hazard SSdime\t -'%;r;�d�,e„ maw ttm aml ryas" City Wide o� to0100.11;MI Igo� �of1111111111111000\\ll X11\ 111111,1.111\\\\111�11 1 \\1D ,11���� �� . X111\\I\\1`�"�`��1`�1���`��`����������������������������������\ I�o���a�i1��a�1o���i���`�lo��,� ��,��i�����i���o�i��o�,�"���0�0 t 1 1111���\�1�� 1 111 1� 1 0100 .111011\\� 1\) 1��1�11111���1�1�0 10111�11�111�0� 1 1 0 0 Inland 2 umsssssam 0 0 0 0 AWA.M. %AAA fififi\\ %Attitt% 1 0 0 $20,000 $0 Issassanzass vontammur 1 3/18/2016 66 1.5% 010�0101�10 liiii luu�iuiliiii�i lilt l0�1�11�0100o0a>u�l u� 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ I 0 1 1�1\��0����1����\���1�������������������„,,,,,,,�,,,�„�`�,,,�,,,,,,�„X11,,,1„�1,,,,,,��1,,�,1”�,,,���,,,��101�\1�01���1���10�1���������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �lll 1,11 , , 111„ ,,, .1, 1 �l \ l \ 11\11111 l 11 X111\1111111 1 11 1 1 I \ 111111111111111111111111 11111111,..... \ 11110101101 1101�>11\,...,. 111 ( 11 111 II 1 1 � 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 � � 1m n1111111`�`����1����`���`����111���1��1��1�,�����`��I�����'�1����;,����1��11���'�i�l��”�1�1���1��111���\11�1�1���1�"�������������� n1111111`�`����1����`���`����������II�I�I�I��i111���,����������������,�1����,�`������d1�1���11111��\111\1\11\1������������������� 01 la 0 sl loll 111 0�ua lol ai of la 0 01 0 11 1111 1 11101111111\11\11011110,.1\ 0111.,11111111111U�.001 1 .111\1\0\001 1111111 111111 1 1 1 \ 11� 1 111. \ (\ \ 1 1 �1 1 1\ \ 1 1 0 \\ 1 \ fl� m � � m \\��1�0��1�11���������\\����������\\� ��������Illl�llllll�ll�ll���ill�ll,���ll;���ll�llll�ll�ll„y������� ���������,1111��1111��;�1�1�111,111111;��11���11,1�1�11;11�1�������� ������������\�1,�11111�1,1�1�1���1���������11����� �����������������„111„��11„1�1�1,��\���\t�\�\�������\�� 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 2.45 $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 19 1 If” ,n Figure 8-4. City of Agua Dulce Windstorm Events ISI 11111111111111111111 Il 111l 11' 111111111111111111moo, PAN ,IIII11 111111111111111111111 ��1 ! 1!D111111)111miIIII II II� �L�l'11111111111111111111'''1r 1 I IIII111„1„1„1„11 111111 II ,If�d��j�fl�� 1 Y Fpi�Y�ilI lI1I1!A'1� '11lf SII iiu� �6 4r ����,�1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111I 11l a ��1111II�IIIIV 1�II I� 111,1 ll 1IiniHmau111111",r l ,11111111111 o%JAY / f ,fi;j; / ""y dal i P: J// w C J/ // IJf/l%rfJr"/// 11111111111 Diol Giy� 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 t%,�rrrr�r��rrrl� P ar / IRA ler „ 0110 i1r CA.orff, Ilii iGn4i446'd:(11114 Arp DA* Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 20 1 P a City of Bishop Windstorms Hazard slaw m nassi mtmemr• City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 X11 II 11 ��� 111 000 11 �111� 111 1 1111111 Q � 1 \ \11\11.0\\\0\\�� 110111 111011\0111\� X111 I tilll I111111UI Ill 1\l\ 10 110 Ol\\ \l DO 111. � � � 1 1 1 � , 1 1 11 \ \ �1 t, I j� � 1 � �� ��1�1111111 ��`��1��`��`�`��\���������������\������������������������������o������i�11���1io��a��`�io�,�`1����11ii���������1111��0��111���ii���u�l�oti�l���0�1�»1'i,�`���i� \oUl\lig`���i�11���0,�`1���ia�l,C,��i�\\11\\11�1\\\`1��"1����`���`�\��`�������������\��������� 1.719 MIT Min \VI 8 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 17� �1�1�1�1���1����111�`����������\�����\�������������������������������������������������11»X11»,�„�,,,II��„��`�,,,1,,,,»��„�1�1�1011�10101�1111�1�1�1��\�����������\�����\���������������������������������������� *my% \\I\AA1 Awm. m.\.% mkt 8 0 0 $50,000 $0 ISSISSE 1 1 v 1 � 11 0\ 01 11 11Cletnal1 1111 1\1 11101 111011 111 10111\ 111 1 Illll 11 1 1111 1 \\11 � 1 \1 1.01111110\11111100111. �10\11111�11 �1101�\0\\0 .�\� 111 1011\1.11111111.11�1� � �1 ��111�1� ��\\\0��0\\11 1111 � ����0�\111 \���11� 1 �1�I� I � 1\0 � � �����,1`���1���1�1�1�1�1�����,��1�1�11,�1��1������� �1��\,`��,�1�»�1����������1\�1���11���11�1�11�11� 1�1���������������1����1�� SWEINSI �1���„��������\ 8 7/11/1981 to 3/18/2016 35 SISS21 MISS 22.9% 1\i‘"•""l'''''111111malss ittt 11 EMI 111111M 11111 tall IN MU 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 539.02 $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 21 1 If” a 1111111 11111111111111111 111 1111111111til111111111111 lll:ll�� 11111111 VI VI Figure 8-5. City of Bishop Windstorm Events 1,1111111I1I IIIIIIII Illlll111111iilllll 1))J J)l� �� iiIIIIII�I"lid �I� ""111111111111 effemilkkg 11,111111o)),11111141,11111 u:u 1111111111111111111 111111111111111, 11,01//////kill ; I r(11111«/:«1111;11:1 qr,P Ill1 rr i• uU,Ul ,/NpifIII {{cru/ll�ni uh I ° ,: I�p�flIII11I m l p,rrNpllll!II�IIfpll��i NflVI Ili 111 111111111) NNNJJJJJII 11)1E11 MINI 0 a p III CI t�'rhr 11 II 11)) '�,� p III �I�IIIIII„ III I,!II� )i IlIiIMIlI1�l��� 9)I1�i� Ili 1 IjIIIIII '(tlllll YIIIII �IIIIllI111111III II I �6�11 ���I,I�i IiIlj111111 II li 111.1.1111 I IIIIIII n1 r �I�'I I II 1' SII Ip III Ill) I IIG �1 � y11))1101IQ i6111�1I11�� II 111 1��IIIII, •igiV 11111111111111 , IIlI I11 11111111 , 11/1§g//////,1111,111111100 imu//111 : 11„,mu l' ��I ulllllllllll IIIIIII„ 11111111111111111111 JI 1111111111111111111111111111111111 ;,. IIIIIII ��11111II�II�IIII1IIIIIII I1III�I1�III�11111I I1( � X11 II II .1 1Ullr 1111111/11111 III 111111111111111111111111111,11lM „I,, .1111 111111111 ,liiuuuuuuu0000000li 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11uuu11111.111111 11111'911111111111�i 11111.111111 111111111111,11111111111„11111,111„1, IIIIII 1oI',11, 111 111 I1H1 1111111111111' 11lIIi1i111ii11 11IVGI 11111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111? SII 10 1IpIIII1,111100� VIkV11IIfWI11,V'4' 11414 ”„, rr'Ir'n Ir vm Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 22 1 113 ,n dr m1i City of Corpus Christi Windstorms Hazard SISSMS1 I 1 slaw m nassl 1w zazr\ly au ta\\ City Wide Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 assissminnin lonsassm 111 MA 111 123 29 57 15 10 3 5 4 AIM\ x \PM N Ati tt.%. 123 0 6 $51.447.000 $110,000 assssnmsssss. INER laman mins 1.3111 123 6/1/1957 to 3/19/2016 ISSSSSI 31 NMI SSW 1r 1 111 11111111 SERSI SUSS 59 208.5% 324,074 $7,007,832,685 $10,238,656,508 24632.44 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $6,044,014.65 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 23 1 If" a Figure 8-5. City of Corpus Christi Windstorm Events S l�il+ 11�71111��1y� � dl 111111111111111111111111111 Ill I IIIi6101 pI1II 1 1 .,. 111'11'1'1'1'111'1'11111I 11111111111 e'o1 d1I1p10 41111 VVI g4q0 1IIIII „ Ki P 1 Ilii �s�uo, l+fi,MIti�V�Ij'p1��V�I, S uNo, � ilP 111111111111111111111111111111111111 WN jyIII�IIlIIi IIIII I II h �� dNMM 1 MMMd 1 MM MMIM ;MM �f 5V MME �� I IH0�411111111�I1 ' �1W�OW I iu11 udl 110I��Mi Miura auw„�,.r eq,tl 1 I aummu�mummm�umm�mmu 10 IIII 1111 )1 11111111111 e 111111111111 :11111111111101111111111111 mlVa' '191r. V4u p11PIIVI 111 1111111 rpc',AroKK*1r„ dA(*itar 1,44.finwgw ok �I�W V11adM"a'�W1V�m r b�tl"m6WM 4'W,AiZ4II0 94 11 0) 10:00!Cr r ItIn .4*'@W',°0 x4r CI0,1,!Nri, 0610 Ill, Ill, Ill, Ill, IIII Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 24 1 P ,,n d', m' City of Driscoll Windstorms Hazard SSS\11nt\SSSS\\\\\\\\_ assi "iii IsmEnt • emu tak. City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 MEMs 115 MS 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 PAW X11 \\SR, t. 5 0 0 $270,000 $0 ssssss�����������������; nas:wEssssssssssmall unam trean Inins 5 6/2/2010 to 3/18/2016 6 83.3% \ANAA\ly I�fims�S��S�4��"i� titt ,,,11111111% fir,ME r ISMS SW= 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 464.67 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 25 1 If" a 111111011111111111111111111111111111111 1 III il; p 111111111111011111111111 ilooml000 01010.10. %11I � I 41II1�11111" Figure 8-6. City of Driscoll Windstorm Events fN11i1l11lt1l1 Iii)111IIIIII1111111111 1r111 Err,.1 oY 1 1111 IIIIIIIHrHrIrrIrr pl�l l IS1,rr ! 1u �� III Ilh1I r 1111 ij 11 u00jl1l Xa1'N1l�n� H'111(1011 011 0000 un ' ' II ��.. 0000000010000 000 p��I Ipol111111111111 11IH11111111 1 11'1'1111111 "� IIII mI II I ll�llliiiilIIIII VIII I IIII IIIIII, 1 1111111119111114h 11114 1��11111111111111111 �� �� —v. -v111101111111111111 IIII111111�1111111I, wl rr 111111111H111111'll �)Ilnv1f111111 a ul 111 x111 pp gg 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111ti1�1��111, tl m 11111100 111111111 11 111111111111111111111111111111111 ' ! 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 ' �111uu� 11 11'.1! 14, 0II00 vv 1,000000111111 moom000 IV'Vi1 `,YN IUV1+p to 1 11 11 1 �Ir1' IIII I III I'Iillil1111 1;d'11'i1111mmm111111111111111� 11'1 P1 + "11111111 uuuuuuuuuuluuuu111 ' uuu111 (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII f III IIIIUIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIUIIiulullill�1III111 I,!"' I1�'!,III1��11i,111''11111 II 1111111111111111111111,1,1,11111IIIIIIIII11111111111111111'11111 �u II IIII Iiiiiiiiiii IIII UIIIIIIIIIUIIP VIV11111UIIUIIllll1111111 �,IIIIviluuull111YIY111'"i� I++I .r + 1111 111„ III11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111IIII,II,q' 1. 1P ly)11 1 uuuuu1111111111111111111111111111 1111E uu11111111111111111111I1111 jl1 !4�'9�I 111111 HH 111111111111111111111 11111111111 1'��II'� h� YIY 11111 I 111111111111111111111111 IIIIII1111 H„, IIIIIII J i1�111 iil ' 111111111111111111111111111111111111: @ � X1111111 ^11111111 III v111111,1 1l01lllllll00,�u��el A l IIIII 1. 111 01 �'I 1 11100011IIIIIIp1111p1111U1uun 00 000 0 11111111111111111111111111111111 1 t11111,11111111111111111,111 'II�dB'v111111111,11,11,11,11,111,11,111, II 0 ' 11 1111 1111111111111111111111111 1 Holli Prd'�l �I mvp 111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111 11111 111111111111 1111111111 11111111 A!11191 !1111! 1111111!111I IIII II99IIIIIIIIIIW Ill IIIIIIII1111i11111V1�Y11�'17111 000°1l110°°Illuu IIIIJff1111111i1IIIA 11111111111111111111111111 11100 I 11111111111111111111 IIIIIppoIDII VI 11 J11���r> Illi 1 1111 II 1 ll(dluml I rfi r (9o1VIJ11,1 na 11.(11(iIli llu owllw,, /I1/11„. p..11iHttHHHH4H w .rol srw'14u Yr IHH«'INHHY 01'm Pito) owrotreHo', HiloorrHratH Cw rir,Y'ry: 011115(14( Awur^ ,)11°l, ,1 1 11000.4044 r'wC1 Plus r,., atm, 1I114 1(10 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 26 1 11 ,n d m^ City of Petronila Windstorms Hazards ISSIllnISISS\\\\\‘‘‘‘‘M\\\\\\\_ asst "iii IsmEnt • emu City Wide Inland 1 SISISSWITEMBEIMIERSISSM111 MB VI 111111" 0 0 0 1 Sbiiwii.•,• GJd"3vii.•,• \\SW' %SAW t.Vt� ,,,,,;,rad%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"dam,,,,,, 9�:,s'd»f�,��I����, ,,,sm: 0 0 0 1 0 0 $25,000 $0 11121 11m171 111`1������������������������������������������� Mtn \�1\ � 1101 0011 � letan 101 0� 1 111 0�� 1 1 � 11 1 11 \�� 1III�I�I`II��� �\\��1 1���1 �11111�1� ���11�01� � ���0����� . ��\ ��������������� ������������1�1���1�������������������������������11����1�1���1��111��111�1�1�»�������������� 1 1950-2016* 20* *titiaictitttltlMIISSSS %."11111 lssnnBBnssllasvilminsu tttttVi" 111•1111 111111_ SWIM 1112111 5% 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 926.66 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 27 1 If" a Figure 8-7. City of Petronila Windstorm Events 0101110111100010 'N� 001,111100 �11JIIIIIIIIIIIIII lllllllllllllllllllll+ i 1"il i�1J!!illlllllllllllli 011001,011,111,1000I 0 1 a I11ii`,P+'r"'' 1111111111111100a „„„„ �4I1 II III 111 1 1 mm 0 1'01111111111111'1 I ®1 HJ E 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110101010101101 11111 11111111 10011110101111111111111111111110000,1,10,1111111111,1111111,111111000000 �1' mm1 11111111111111101011111 `lootillmoll�1101101 mIIII IIIIIpI001 0000000000,1011000111110011"""'. IIf IIII 111 1Ilf1,�lIIIII1111111111111IIIIiIIIII; x"II I!1 6„,„ "„"„ 000000 1 11 11111111111111 10111 yuuum ,% in uu�IdW�lra'',i.ui�ur '' 000u011u0l IIII !p ld�'� 1II 111 u.10 111 11111111111 I li 1 1u11 u1R�� II, I111111111111111111111110111I p !9,'11�1�111111114444NIN 1 11 6 III 1111111111111111 III 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I 010100 D.111111111,111 111111000 III 1111 ILII I I � I11I illi I I I a' 11 "10. 111. 111"11111110011 I 11111111111111111111 00 1001 0,06 1 Z'I Mil4I� i4''I,!d0111111 111111111111110101 P m. 4 WIIpN1 0 Ill ti NI III 00011000000011001110 mum 'r 111111111111111111111111111 11111111 1111111111,1.11.11.11.11.1111.11.1111.11.1111.0011111111111 �! � 'h 1 11 �I IPIYI 00000000000�II lllullii0000 11 l 1 IIIIIIIII 1l°II ill lu 1I 1 1 I;�,NI111u11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0000001100000000000000000 1111 0\ I I II fi1i 1 11111111 l' 111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 ' V IIVII 111 11��l �!I��11116 .��GII�111 0U11T1�1 . 11 11 INI I'° 111 11 'IId1 11111111111111111111111Hi s It�l til 11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1011 001110101 11111111 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010111 111111111111111.11111.111111 11 61. 1 11011111111111011111111111111101110101111111111011111000100101101111101111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111110101101010010111 010 II 1 01111 II ill11,11,11,11,11, 14'" ,,rvdw1 wur ik, 0110.14,tImmrd 10011,0001 001,/1,0w01 Kw/ $00000,rom. 001"011100I,,00471. 1, loot i Ia 1111111111SI 111 111111111111 � I 1111111 .11 !be111, ,,m )10,1 41, W" -a, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 28 1 II ,n d m' City of Port Aransas Windstorms Hazard lassuzzt "iiissi -,,m onsi City Wide Seaward and Inland 1 Wit% WA V11%1 il\NA tk% 12 2 5 0 3 1 0 1 ssssssasssss URA\\ N uttu ��e >(je/ ��szvmkt% tutt. 12 0 12 8/5/1975 to 11/3/2012 0 $5,050,000 $0 � ����`���"���������`���`\\�������`���i�`�1�����������a���i���������� ����"�����o��l1i�������������a����"�a��� 37 32.4% ISSIS%BMII\SSS%����������������� IIMM\Ass\vBBRBnlsusslvslltsss zs�s�fi�i�»>���MEIN11111111 MOHifi SIMI 3,955 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 29 1 If" a Figure 8-8. City of Port Aransas Windstorm Events 1 11111111 Pol 1111111111111111111111111111111 �U�r� icy Hwy"i/r rd d�ri V�� rog ryganreio , 6.50 igiwrgrs ir tor, -a0F srui;+;P,M Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 30 1 P ,n City of Robstown Windstorms Hazard SSS\r laSSISS sissiz "iii sturnmval assl 14 City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 SISSISMI 121131115 en IS Alt• 3sfififi���S�� 5 6 0 2 10 0 0 0 VA\ Att 1 0 $4,675,000 $100,000 sassaimmassass 11111111 MEM111113 11111111 10 10/4/1956 to 3/18/2016 SMSSSISIIIMIWM e7RSSSSS 60 16.7% 1•11M\ISSIEntrantlantlintliSSI.' itit \ 11111111111 WEEK SWAN 1111 11,576 $151,390,423 $183,445,540 6580.37 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 31 1 If" a Figure 8-9. City of Robstown Windstorm Events ro 111 mum Mninimmommononnonnot Win* n nil inn 9iI1 a 1� ul illlpl)1,1,,nolnilnnnAnn n'n MmoVy n 111110 11 nn • OnmnInn i I 410,11111111111111111111 In iln"""" 101 111111111111111111111111 lyouoml hM� Yeo u n 111111111111 iwf 1um>rww'ao, r"aml4ct,nomr,and nrinonM.: war,,;-"tnC''n moth,' T wAmpimm�w,'C'.OavrQ°,ip. P'�k'wNflp~Ir'q Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 32 1 P wwn d', m' Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorms Hazard \\SSS\111aSSSSS\\\\\\\_ laSSssum "iiissi Ismin • emu tak. Jurisdiction Wide Inland 1 ISSSSSSMEITBIErnnnSSSSSi MEM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ItIn\ IntA Matt k tAt. tt\t% 2 0 0 $1,050,000 $100,000 sst��S��S���nas:mmsssss000000000000000 WWI WEE 1111115 11EINI 2 5/10/2012 5 ISSISSr 1111% N/A Industrial Area *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 40.0% ssuntmassi ssummtlaint Rr"-�°N 111211 +E' I" UMW $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 33 1 If" a Figure 8-10. Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorm Events iillli�wi 1111111111111 lool000loh 111111111 4 1111111111111111111111111111111 itmooNuo woo 1.110 0111111111 to yy w.ly'111. uml IOouoiu a uui ul. f 1100111011111111111111111111 IIIIV—V iIIII,I,',11.11!,1,1!.1.1.4w0.p 9;uINimIOINWiViWloil �VW@V "iuuuuluuuollu'IopliVVum IIVV NIIIVIVVIINIVIIIO� NuuwIIWoIIVoml"11 II 1,11,1111111001,1 SII@ 'liry ',w�dv 111:111.10h'001111.1.1.1111.11,1,1„1,01„,,� Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 34 1 II , n d o 111.11111111 It II IIII 111 I 11111111111111111111111111 II111111111 ID II flll�(lllf III IIII '11111 11 Extreme Heat Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Extreme Heat Hazard 5 City of Agua Dulce Extreme Heat Hazard 6 City of Bishop Extreme Heat Hazard 7 City of Corpus Christi Extreme Heat Hazard 8 City of Driscoll Extreme Heat Hazard 9 City of Petronila Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Port Aransas Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Robstown Extreme Heat Hazard 12 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Extreme Heat Hazard 13 Extreme Heat Hazard Overview Description Extreme heat is the condition whereby temperatures hover ten degrees or more above the average high temperature in a region for an extended period. If extreme heat conditions persist, it may be considered a heat wave. Location Climate and weather are major drivers of extreme heat. The spatial and temporal ranges at which these forces operate are relatively large scale, putting the entire planning area in risk. A phenomenon known as heat islanding may mean that urban areas are at slightly higher risk than nearby rural areas. Man-made surfaces such as concrete and asphalt absorb thermal energy from the sun during the day. During night time, this thermal energy is released. This cyclical process ensures that ambient temperature remains high through the city. The heat islanding effect may cause temperatures to be up to 10 degrees higher in urban areas than in surrounding rural areas. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 1 1 If" ,n Extent Extreme heat is most dangerous in the summer months. Extreme heat is not just a factor of temperature; humidity plays a role as well. An extreme heat event may occur with air temperature as low as 80°F if the relative humidity is over 40%. An 80°F temperature seems low, particularly for Texas in the summer, so people may not be aware of the risk to extreme heat and therefore may not adequately prepared for the effects of extreme heat. Citizens of the planning area, particularly populations vulnerable to extreme heat, should avoid prolonged heat exposure. Table 9-1. NOAA's National Weather Service Heat Index, Temperature (F°) 80 ,s t 88 88 84 87 8 t 85 88 8i 84 88 89 82 84 88 9 t 02 88 89 LH 83 88 9� 84 88 �2 9 84 89 88 8 9 8 ,0100 Uk tihood ofH . sor a rs with Pro on E os owe or tr mous Activity ]I" Ho thor, I Danger NOAA's National Weather Service Heat Index table shows how humidity and temperature interact to endanger people who are engaged in strenuous activity or are exposed to the environment without any protection. It should be noted that these risks exist even if the area is not currently experiencing conditions that qualify as an extreme heat event. The normal high temperatures may be enough to endanger human health. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 2 1 P ,a Table 9-2 — Previous maximum temperatures This is the worst that can be expected in the future. U ,,,,�,,,�,,,���,,,,,��,,,���\�\�\1�\11\101\1�1�\\111��������������SUS op) Unincorporated Nueces County September 2000 Agua Dulce September 2000 Bishop September 2000 Corpus Christi September 2000 Driscoll September 2000 Petronila September 2000 Port Aransas September 2000 Robstown August 1983 Port of Corpus Christi Authority September 2000 Occurrences Extreme heat events typically occur in summer months during periods of high heat and high humidity. According to the NCDC, five extreme heat events took place in Nueces County from 1950 to 2016. All events are recorded at the county level, though comments may reflect noteworthy events at the municipal level. 8/31/2000 Table 9-3. Previous Occurrences „11111111�ti91��titi�mgWum1W1),ii,m'li�i«,y,,,,,,�„�,�il�il�i�lu�mum� I�I Corpus Chr'sti nternational Airport reported a high of 103 degrees, tying the record high temperature for August. 9/1/2000 Corpus Christi reached an all-time high temperature of 109 degrees on 9/5/2000. This date to may be the overall hottest day on record in South Texas. Other jurisdictions in South Texas 9/5/2000 reported all-time highs on the day. For a period of about five hours, temperatures climbed into the low -100s ahead of a cold front. 5/10/2006 8/1/2011 9/8/2015 Temperatures in Nueces County ranged from 100 — 108 degrees. Heat index values were around 110 degrees. The conditions led to the death of a homeless man in Corpus Christi due to dehydration and heat stroke. Temperatures were around 90 degrees with a 100 degree heat index. A four year month old Corpus Christi boy was found dead inside a car after about 40 minutes.' 1http://www. mysanantonio.com/news/local/crime/article/Corpus-Christi-father-indicted-arrested-for- 6948457. p h p Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 3 1 IP ,n The state of Texas is generally very hot in the summer. From 1999 — 2016, 247 heat - related deaths were reported by the NCDC in the state of Texas. Remarkably, forty-seven of the heat -related deaths occurred during the evacuation of hurricane Rita. Probability The five historical heat events reported by NCDC from 1950 to 2016 suggest that the planning area and all participating jurisdictions can expect a 7.5% annual occurrence of extreme heat events. The expected reoccurrence interval of extreme heat events is about 13.2 years. Extreme heat events are expected to take place in summer months based on previous occurrences which were reported in the months of May through September. Impact The risks associated with extreme heat tend to most greatly impact humans. Buildings are not likely to be damaged by extreme heat. The populations most at risk are children, the elderly, those in poor health, and those who spend large portions of their time outside. According to the latest compiled study on heat related deaths by the National Center for Environmental Health, from 1999-2009, the most recent years for which a report of this nature has been compiled, extreme heat exposure led to 7,233 deaths in the United States. The victims of extreme heat tended to be male (69%) and over the age of 65 (39%). The overwhelming majority of deaths (94%) occurred in the summer months of May to September. Extreme heat can impact agricultural industries in the form of crop or livestock losses. Extreme heat may cause economic impacts related to damage crops and grazing lands caused by reduced productivity of workers. Vulnerability Due to the uniformity of extreme heat events across the planning area, jurisdictional variations in vulnerability provide the most informative perspective from which to examine differences in extreme heat within the planning area. Males and those over the age of 65 tend to be the populations most vulnerable to extreme heat hazards. Demographic information regarding these populations follow in the jurisdictional tables. Agricultural assets are also vulnerable to extreme heat. Livestock and crops can be damaged or killed by extreme heat. Information regarding the vulnerability of agricultural assets follows in the jurisdictional tables. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 4 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Extreme Heat Hazard sslassictsssms „,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, County Wide (Unincorporated) ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilArl\A\ \u"Illx\AttAt Att AUM. %Mt 15,274 31,2734.7 7,542 2,501 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 73.77% 1,112 $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 5 1 If” a City of Agua Dulce Extreme Heat Hazard SSSSSSIIMSSSS\S\\\\\ City Wide elr\SS\\re\irerl\\ te•", 820 %\‘" 2.45 387 108 `1 1, 11 111 I o 110\ �t��������� ������������� ���� ��'�iit 1.12% 47 AIW \\\ %AAA $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 9 6 1 If" a City of Bishop Extreme Heat Hazard SSSSSS\IMSS\SSS „,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,City Wide\ ‘11\1\ TIR ” 3,150 Arl\r\l‘ 539.02 1,597 693 35.57% 241 \I\ tt% $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 7 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Extreme Heat Hazard sslassictsssms City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilArl\A\ \u"Illx\AttAt Att AUM. %Mt 3 24, 074 24,632.44 159,120 40,509 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 7.64% 17,503 $6,044,014.65 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 8 1 If" a City of Driscoll Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtssssssssmll\ City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilAr 1\A\ \u"Illx\tg Att AUM. %Mt 752 464.67 340 136 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 62.4% 57 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 9 1 If" a City of Petronila Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtssssssssmll\ City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilArl\A\ \u"Illx\AttAt Att AUM. %Mt 114 926.66 68 19 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 79.36% 15 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 10 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtsssss City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilAr 1\A\ \u"Illx\tg Att AUM. %Mt 3,955 0 1,776 910 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 0% 373 $0.00 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 11 1 If" a City of Robstown Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtsssss „,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, City Wide SSSSSIIMIIISS%%% yell \ \Ill:0 11,576 6580.37 5,649 1,505 `1 1, 11 111 IIt\o����������������������� 66.32% 469 At \\. %\t% $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 12 1 If” a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Extreme Heat Hazard sssssstcn\ssss Jurisdiction Wide N/A "VIA \MAI \ 0 N/A 1.‘" .,AANA111 1111\T IAtt 0% Vat\ N/A u As It\AA N/A \%\tV. $o The Port of Corpus Christi Authority lacks vulnerable agricultural area or resident populations. However, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority is major regional employer, directly employing 13,770 people. Many of the employment positions expose employees to environmental heat hazards. Additionally, facilities within the Port of Corpus Christi Authority make use of air conditioning equipment. During times of extreme heat, these facilities may put additional burden on air conditioning equipment. Should the air conditioning fail, these facilities may become hazardous and may expose employees to injurious or fatal heat. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 13 1 If" a If1111� l IIIIIIIII� 11111lllllllllllll�l� I 11111 Lightning Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Lightning Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Lightning Hazard 7 City of Bishop Lightning Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Lightning Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Lightning Hazard 10 City of Petronila Lightning Hazard 11 City of Port Aransas Lightning Hazard 12 City of Robstown Lightning Hazard 13 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Lightning Hazard 14 Lightning Hazard Overview Description Lightning is a sudden electrostatic discharge during an electrical storm between electrically charged regions of a cloud, between that cloud and another cloud, or between a cloud and the ground. Location Worldwide, there is predictable spatial variation in the frequency of lightning strikes. However, when examining lighting activity at smaller scales, such as the county or community level, the distribution of lightning events is evenly distributed. Lightning does not have any specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to lightning activity. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 1 1 If" ,n Figure 10-1. Cloud -to -Ground Lightning Incidence in the Continental U.S. (1997-2010) c z z o C, [•E F. M" .[2 01 5•1 431 '5 Pl Y"' ti] 6.6 i3 W4 u ie 1.1 M1 W ELS 411 V4 Li! 1:1 NP P1 cv r6 0111111,1111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 2 1 If" ,n ISI Extent Lightning extents can be described in terms of the frequency of lightning strikes within a time frame. Lightning Activity Levels (LAL) is one of the metrics used to describe lightning extent. Table 10-1. Lightning Activity Levels (LAL) 1 No thunderstorms 2 1 1111M\IY, ANIttAtt \ Cumulus clouds are common but only a few reach the towering cumulus stage. A single thunderstorm must be confirmed in the observation area. The clouds produce mainly virga, but light train will occasionally reach the ground. Lightning is very infrequent. 1-8 Towering cumulus covers less than two-tenths of the sky. Thunderstorms are few, 3 but two to three must occur within the observation are. Light to moderate rain will 9-15 reach the ground, and lightning is infrequent. Towering cumulus covers two to three -tenths of the sky. Thunderstorms are 4 scattered and more than three must occur within the observation area. Moderate 16-25 rain is common and lightning is frequent. Towering cumulus and thunderstorms are numerous. They cover more than three - 5 tenths and occasionally obscure the sky. Rain is moderate to heavy and lightning is >25 frequent and intense. 6 Similar to LAL 3 except thunderstorms are dry. All participating jurisdictions are vulnerable to LAL5. The worst lightning extent the planning area and all participating jurisdictions can expect to experience is LAL5. Occurrence NCDC records from 1950 — 2016 show four records of lightning strikes within the planning area. Corpus Christi recorded three events and Port Aransas recorded one event. None of these events recorded any property damage. Unfortunately, the Port Aransas event resulted in the death of a 63 -year-old beach goer. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority website history section recalls a lightning strike on a grain elevator damaging property and killing a night watchman. No estimates for damage 1 From http://www.prh.noaa.gov/hnl/pages/LAL.php Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 3 1 P ,n were provided. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority's website history section covers a date range of 1920 — 2016. Texas A&M Forest service records show that from 2005 — 2015, one lightning -started fire took place in Nueces County and one lightning -started fire took place in Corpus Christi. Lightning occurrences are discussed in greater detail in the jurisdictional tables. Probability The probability of a lightning strike is calculated by dividing the number of events by the number of years for which records exist. For jurisdictions without records, a probability of 1% will be applied. Because lightning is assumed to take place uniformly within the planning area and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority experienced one event in 96 years, it is assumed that the probability of a lightning strike is similar for other jurisdictions in the planning area. Impact Each individual lightning strike has a very small spatial extent. Only the facilities hit by lightning are expected to be damaged. Facility shutdowns are expected to be less than 24 hours. Deaths are possible, but rare. In the 96 years of history provided by the Port of Corpus Christi Authority and the 66 records from NCDC, only two lightning deaths were recorded. Injuries to lightning are also rare. One of the lightning strikes in Corpus Christi in NCDC records was a lightning strike on an occupied truck. The person inside the vehicle was not killed or injured. Another one of the NDCD in Corpus Christi involved three people who were nearly struck by lightning while playing golf. The record indicates that even though they were very close to the lightning strike, "[injuries] were very minor." The downstream impacts of a lightning strike have the potential to be damaging. Lightning strikes have the potential to spark wildfires, cause explosions or fires if they hit combustible materials, or damage power infrastructure. Lightning impacts are provided for each jurisdiction as a function of the potential future losses including commercial property value and agricultural value. Commercial property value for each jurisdiction was compiled from the Nueces County Appraisal Role. Agricultural value for each jurisdiction is a function of the total agricultural lands shown in the National Land Cover Database divided by the total agricultural land for the county and multiplied by the total agricultural value for Nueces County from the 2012 Agricultural Census. Vulnerability The vulnerabilities to lightning come in the form of assets that may be damaged by a strike or in the form of agricultural land that would be vulnerable to lightning -started wildfires. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority may be a particularly vulnerable jurisdiction. Much of the equipment and facilities within the jurisdiction are quite tall and made of metal. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 41Page These assets may be the fastest way for lightning to discharge. Communities with higher concentrations of commercial buildings may be more vulnerable to lightning strikes. Commercial buildings are often taller than residential buildings, particularly single family residential buildings, and may be at greater risk of lightning strikes. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 5 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Lightning Hazard IIISSSS\IIS\\rllrtllalWSNS\\ 08/30/2/00019/2-0106ac-reWfiarseecac:ii is teadikb3Vgl-alltenricn):,1r!eGarre;[47\11:fyinAerreya Drive MEM Enlir 2 ** No reported deaths, injuries, or damage. 0 death, 0 injury** $0** lsstssat„mnssssl sammem,rammal assummanasss 10% annual chance 1 lightning event every 10 years Sninaltratr 211%ISSISMEE $373,034,606 $76,735,126 ssstss\mtntnssss,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7836 312,734.7 73.77% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 6 1 If” ,n City of Agua Dulce Lightning Hazard ssssstrctntunsstss No NCDC Records ttsssssmtmass s, : wurrimscarai 0 0 death, 0 injury so tnnrnssss\ istormultranal istanzurtnals. 1% Annual Chance* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area 1 lightning event every year* Sninaltratr 211% IS $17,541,361 $602 lssssssztmr ss\ss 11•1111111211121111111111•11 221 2.45 1.12% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 7 1 If" a City of Bishop Lightning Hazard ssssssmmcrmtntcnssss No NCDC Records ssssstnnts imam lumirvinx sunall 0 0 death, 0 injury $0 sssssmzmsss Isironnarm sslutmmmmsss 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area SnInalratr 211% SI $115,889,915 $539 ISSSSSMIZMSSSS 111•1111111211•11111111111•11 466 539.02 35.57% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 8 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Lightning Hazard sssssslltIPP;n,\\s\s\ 06/26/2006 — Foundation company truck on McBride Ln 10/5/2008 — 1 acre fired caused by lightning, near Access Road 4 ISSSSSSMIZZMSSSS WINEESISESEVIRISCarall 3 0 death, 3 injury $0** ISISSSSMZIESSS%%% tatttEttrElnIIS\11SSV1MlrrrnSS 6.1% Annual Chance however, no cost estimate of damage was reported. 1 lightning event every 16.5 years ISSInalltr 211% SISSMIEEMSSI $7,148,763,878 $6,044,014 11,12111118,464 24,632.44 7.64% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 9 1 If" a City of Driscoll Lightning Hazard \\sssssrtmz\ztnssss No NCDC Records sssssrinmtssss imam lumirvinx sunall 0 0 death, 0 injury $0 sssssmzmsss Isironnarmsalummtrass 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area € SInar 211% SI $25,502,273 $114,014 ISSISSIMEMASSIS 272 464.67 62.4% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 10 1 Ii" a City of Petronila Lightning Hazard \\sssssrtmz\ztnssss No NCDC Records sssssrinmtssss imam lumirvinx sunall 0 0 death, 0 injury $0 sssssmzmsss Isironnarmsalummtrass 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area € SInar 211% SI $3,714,796 $227,373 SSSSS.MtntnSSSS 114 926.66 79.36% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 11 1 Ii" a City of Port Aransas Lightning Hazard \ssssssrmx\ztnsxsss 03/15/2009 - Mustang Island Beach stssssttmssss s, : sr"Enrrinx sturnau 1 1 death, 0 injury so slsssssammemultrammassummtnass. 1% Annual Chance 1 lightning event every year SISS%%%%MSSS ISSInalratr 211% SISSMEMMIS1 $413,772,710 $0 slass.saccsssss„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\)) 6,539 0 0% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 12 1 If” a City of Robstown Lightning Hazard \ssssssrmx\ztnsxsss No NCDC Records ISSISSEMESSISS , ENSTIMEIMSCITISI 0 0 death, 0 injury so sammemultranallastentrmassa . 1% Annual Chance* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area 1 lightning event every year* SSS%%%%ZMMIIIMMISISS $151,390,423 $1,614,612 SISSS.S\\\M\IIMMEIMMMISISS 2118 6580.37 66.32% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 13 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Lightning Hazard ssssssx\m\\tnztrztnssss,,`';"''R,�,,,,,,,,,nam,�,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 7/27/1968 — Grain elevator SSSSSSIMISS% EIN SE 117 I AI rW 1 *2012 Dollars — from CHAMPS report 1 death, 0 injury SIZIMME s3,z8�,z5o� lssssstnnrnssss\ satent istanzurtnals 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area ISSInalratr 211% IS $174,026,681 $0 ISSISSMIZE SSS\S 288 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 14 1 If” a JL2 11 1111 I ''',H11111111111111 1,,,111111'111117PU1711,1,171'171717171' 111111111111,1 111111111111, 111119” '9111'1111111 1I111 I:1 n L 111 111,11'1'1'1'1'1'1'.111111111111111111111111111 mm 11111111111111 11111111111111111111111111 mm, 111111111111111 Coastal Erosion Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Coastal Erosion Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Coastal Erosion Hazard 19 City of Bishop Coastal Erosion Hazard 20 City of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 21 City of Driscoll Coastal Erosion Hazard 23 City of Petronila Coastal Erosion Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Coastal Erosion Hazard 25 City of Robstown Coastal Erosion Hazard 27 Port of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 28 Coastal Erosion Hazard Overview Description Coastal erosion is the "loss of land, marshes, wetlands, beaches, or other coastal features within the coastal zone because of the actions of wind, waves, tides, storm surges, subsidence, or other forces"1. Coastal erosion may result in the temporary redistribution of coastal sediments, or the long-term loss of coastal sediments and sediment accumulation. 1 Texas Natural Resources Code, Section 33.601 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 1 1 If" ,n The United States Geologic Survey (USGS) has identified eleven primary natural process and human activities that cause coastal land loss; these are summarized in Table 11-1. These primary causes for coastal land loss can impact the coast concurrently resulting in sever rates of erosion. Figure 11-1 illustrates how this processes jointly impact the coast. Table 11-1. USGS Primary Causes of Coastal Land Loss2 Po Awry %i/!�%////%/////i ja ///oia/////i%% iip/i///iii lEhnii %l/ Illi Amar°a '�'� //�-0�'u} �1141NN r,r � ,u� d �/ '7l'ftlf� +rlil�/l6»II�ID f�///���r �����1(1 % ,� o as ,J a r�aa� 0, �l(/%Ifllfl!'I/9G17I/pp�// %/off%/iii, I % / 1p %ri//O/%/�%!%�i/ // „e,,,,/ �,��f /; ?Vr d;rv;r jig (� 4lil)I IiII v ry J •,7`1x1 l d d T.. 1 Y i �i >( f I � 1 �77,„,,,,,K, / 1114Yr 1U1,1I 'n!' % /�tR, �ro,l tim tllcVW �iaarrl/ ��/%/ o % �Yr� ry , v e � Il�lff yl /19' 2104 11 rNNr�/ r ly / JOY !/i ie/ Afro vvr 9Jb f ,1:,..111b61,11i1M1 1.11 10 ,.04 err *16 414 1111111, 110,0 rti elf 2 Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-337/landloss.pdf Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 21IF' g Figure 11-1. USGS Interacting Factors That Influence Coastal Land Loss3 SOURCES strett rtarcEssnrtt, sitar t4orltt etnoni= rrnrsi'afptes tx,aur^.nrp:rsrr"M;. c ,wu(6441 rears t.t,"t;OS &frorurtttretort storm washout" bid& Wets t rrr4 tat stow:twos thfrrtra;urt truruttrauut owrroaarce extraction aa9PWMfko„., a1;b,Yria4 kpotranspoik preettritaaau0P4 • ave h torrrima't'tr torso ri oto a ormolu truest* dutsttasou AS it oattu t , gr,ad,,,g rrr„ PROCESSESI uncttuuxa / taws Mod stttnrt9, ttttdr rr ur tl moo.. r a0a rraua mu oroomo tion al ^nr hoilf,,mc rrer, SOU (WOO atttW140 rmon G tnh mins Location Nueces County is one of five counties located in Texas' Coastal Region IV as shown in Figure 11-2. The Texas General Land Office defines five regions of the Texas coast in their Texas Coastwide Erosion Response PIan4. Coastal erosion in Nueces County impacts the gulf -facing shoreline, Laguna, bays, islands, navigable waterways, channels, harbors, and marinas. The primary impact along the gulf -facing shoreline is erosion which then contributes to deposition within adjacent waterways and channels as sediment is redistributed by wave and tidal currents. 3 Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-337/landloss.pdf 4 http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal-management/forms/files/coastwide-erosion-response-plan.pdf Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 3 1 Ifn ,n g Figure 11-2. Coastal Region IV — Critical Erosion Areas5 4 01, 11 is 111* u IIII°t IIII'""" :� liii lulu S h lure; IIII l00 ul ; Nueces County has 20.6 miles of gulf -facing shoreline consisting primarily of low - elevation sandy beaches and dunes along the narrow barrier islands of Mustang Island and the northern end of Padre Island.6 II uu lull. W 111B. s W ;an , 1111s0han , s Behind the barrier islands are 407 miles of additional shorelines along the four bays (Corpus Christi Bay, Nueces Bay, Oso Bay, and Redfish Bay), port facilities, marinas, Upper Laguna Madre, Ward Island, Harbor Island and numerous other large and small islands, including wetlands, estuaries, and the mouth of the Nueces River.? 5 Source: http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal-management/forms/files/coastwide-erosion-response-plan.pdf 6 Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 7 Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 41Page v1111 ; IItIIII Waterways an Chan lne1110s The major navigable waterways within Nueces County are the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, La Quinta Channel, Encinal Channel, Rincon Canal, Aransas Channel, Lydia Ann Channel, Packery Channel, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW). Some of these waterways are illustrated in Figure 11-3. Figure 11-3. Nueces County Navigable Waters8 Lwt Quintal m IR A OGS `~',',u mr 'r, S , IPµ .'"R itrai snot torm rant Pass ar KLEBERG R1513 The Port of Corpus Christi is the eight largest port in the United States in total tonnage9 and has 143.5 nautical miles of ship channel. A breakdown of the ship channel extent in nautical miles is shown in Table 11-2. 8 Source: https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hcn05 9 U.S. Port Ranking By Cargo Volume, American Association of Port Authorities, October 9, 2015. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 5 1 If" ,n Table 11-2. Port of Corpus Christi — Ship Channel Distance10 m UUlfffffffffffffff 79 97I l III I II 11,' .11,1 jjjj p�iVlJ, ,ri i i;'f9 P ll'��( IIMIllllllll���������Ml��llf�l�ll�llll�� . l�(((((((( �(((��llID11111111aY(ia i0,1) Yi i°,,, � v 11'41 1,4 /ill/11 1I 11110lPl r There are numerous named and unnamed small watercraft canal and channel systems located, primarily, along the backside of the barrier islands. A sampling of the named channels include: Mustang Beach Channel, Water Exchange Channel (aka, Fish Pass), Humble Channel, Sinclair Cut, Morris & Cummings Cut, Wilsons Cut, and Atlantic. Unnamed channels include public and private canals for residential and commercial access and development. Onarb hili 111 Marinas Also located within Nueces County are various harbors and marinas that are also affected by coastal erosion. A sampling of the major harbors and marinas include: Conn Brown Harbor, Port Ingleside, Viola Turning Basin, Dennis Dryer Municipal Harbor, Island Moorings Marina, and Corpus Christi Marina. The Texas Coastwide Erosion Response Plan (updated 2013) identifies the most recent critical erosion areas for the Nueces County Gulf shoreline. Critical coastal erosion areas are coastal eroding areas that the Land Commissioner "finds to be a threat to: public health, safety, or welfare; public beach use or access; general recreation; traffic safety; public property or infrastructure; private commercial or residential property; fish or wildlife habitat; or an area of regional or national importance."11 1° Source: http://portofcc.com/wp-content/uploads/Rodman-Bay-Map.pdf 11 The Texas Administrative Code, §§15.1-15.10, and Texas Natural Resources Code, Subchapter H, Sec. 33.601 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 6 1 If" ,n Figure 11-4, an excerpt from the Texas Coastwide Response Plan, illustrates the changing rate of the Gulf Coast shoreline. Mustang Island, north of the Packery Channel, is one of the areas along the Texas Gulf Coast undergoing the greatest rates of erosion at more than -8 foot/year. Figure 11-4. Gulf Coast Shoreline Change Rate dIId Padre Wand 1a1n nrda, I1 en nsuda G of Mex'c Stat stiles 2000 2012 f ;11'4 verc'ee Ran !' -38,9 +36,4 ' ey." 3% Advance 0718 Dire -r1 Net - halye e,11171 r yr' Chae te...... 1',yr... rnFyr. 114 14,8 0 - S d °11 0 2. 4. 82 °;: 11.18 y 1 -4,9 0 05 1,5 -1.1 (- 0,5 10 1 - „...:. . —36 60 120 n1 40 BOA mill The shorelines along Nueces County's bays experience similar rates of erosion. For example, North Beach in Corpus Christi Bay has a history of beach erosion requiring periodic restoration with the most recent occurring in 2001, 2003, and 2016.12 12 Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 7 1 I1" ,n y Occurrences Coastal erosion is sporadic and episodic, occurring over short and long-term periods and at different rates along the coast line. Coastal erosion is most apparent over a short period due to sporadic and accelerated rates of erosion due to extreme weather events such as hurricanes and other major storm events. Long-term erosion is less apparent due to slower rates of erosion due to seasonal changes such as El Nino, rising sea levels, and other long-term human activities and natural processes such as climate changes. SItoh lur°t ""for m The most significant cause of short-term coastal erosion is the effect of tropical storms and hurricanes. Storms and hurricanes that enter the Gulf of Mexico cause coastal erosion within Nueces County regardless of the location that the storm makes landfall. Tropical storms and hurricanes within the Gulf cause increased winds and tidal forces that can extend hundreds of miles from the center of the storm. Figure 11-5. Number of Tropical Cyclones per 100 Years (NOAA) 0 0 ' n; v . 111001111111 1111111111(1 11111111111111111111111 000000000000000100000111111111111101 11111 Hatr'r and r ;pica( Stort s an s NOAA The latest Texas Coastwide Erosion Response Plan (updated 2013) also addressed short-term coastal erosion indicating that for the period of time from 2000 to 2012 the coastal erosion rate for the Gulf shoreline along Nueces County varied from more than - 8 foot/year of erosion to more than +8 foot/year of accretion (Figure 11-5). A comparison of the coastal erosion rates based on 2010 Texas GLO data indicates that 6 miles of the 20.6 miles of Nueces County's Gulf -facing shoreline is classified as critical erosion (i.e., greater than -2 feet/year). This accounts for 2.5% of the State total, or 29.1 % of Nueces County's total Gulf -facing shoreline as summarized in Table 11-3. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 81Page Aransas Table 11-3. Critical Erosion for Nueces County Gulf Coastline13 1figi ff Ii IIfPIIIII�n... 25,721 0.4% •l i 0 Y I IIIII IIIhII p �r rr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiilllllliiiilllllliiiilllllliiiill 1111110 19.0 mi. 5.2% 356 mi. 10.6% f+111!ggE !fffig ,140 5,4 16 mi. 6.8% 84.2% -2 to -7 ft/yr Nueces 361,350 5.4% 90.6% 20.6 mi. 5.6% 407 mi. 12.2% 6 mi. 2.5% 29.1% -2 to -6 ft/yr Kleberg 31,690 0.5% 21.8 mi. 5.9% 222 mi. 6.6% 2 mi. 0.8% 9.2% -2 to -6 ft/yr Aransas, Nueces & Kleberg Combined 418,761 6.2% 61.4 mi. 16.7% 985 mi. [ 29.4% 24 mi. 10.1% 39.1% -2 to -7 ft/yr TOTAL ALL COASTAL COUNTIES 6,750,128 367.0 mi. 3345 mi. 237 mi. 64.6% -2 to -50 ft/y The bay shorelines also experienced similar short-term erosion. For example, North Beach located in Corpus Christi Bay had an average erosion rate of -2.6 foot/year along the entire beach with a high of -6 foot/year at the southern end14. The most recent surveys between 2007 and 2012 indicate that approximately 61 % of North Beach in Corpus Christi Bay is eroding, 18% is in transition, and 21% is accreting (see Figure 11-6). 13 Texas GLO, 2010 14 Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, 2012 (Latest Data) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 11 91Page 01111111111111111111 Figure 11-6. North Beach Erosion Rates 2007 to 201215 q !,rtl.6,r'Xi .., A! pmurn t r Total t egend 26 Sep 2007 02 May 2009 20 Jun 2012 e 15 Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi, 2012 (Latest Data) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 10 1 IIS ,n d', m' I1form Long-term Gulf -facing shoreline erosion rate for the beaches of Nueces County have had the lowest average rate of all coastal counties for the last 70 years at -0.92 feet/year16 An analysis of the Gulf -facing shoreline erosion rates also indicates that 96.7%, or approximately 19.9 miles, of the Gulf -facing shoreline within Nueces County is eroding compared to the State average of 64%, but that the mean erosion rate for Nueces County was -1.7 feet/year which was about a third of the State mean of -5.9 feet/year. These values are summarized in Table 11-4. Table 11-4. Gulf Shoreline Erosion Rate for Nueces County and Texas Nueces County II� � ��� II►►►►►►►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII►►►►►►►►►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iflf II l Illili Mustang Island ( CL** 16.2 mi. North Padre Island (ICL & OCL**) 4.4 mi. -0.4 96.7% lofr!TO!' ?fa IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII vv d iii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'vn���'�i �� �� ����� ;°y 15.7 mi. 20.6 mi. 19.9 mi. -2.6 96.7% 4.3 mi. -4.4 -0.4 4.5 1.7 -4.6 -3.0 Texas Shoreline (18505 to 2000) 367.0 mi. -2.3 64% 234.9 mi. -30.2 -5.9 * source: Joint Erosion Response Plan for Nueces County and the City of Corpus Christi published in 2012 (http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal- management/forms/files/nueces.pdf) **ICL = inside Corpus Christi City Limits. OCL = outside Corpus Christi City Limits. Data based on BEG 2007 erosion rates. OCL includes the City of Corpus Christi's Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) on North Padre Island that extend into Kleberg County. ***Excludes ETJ outside of Nueces County. Coastal erosion also results in sediment accretion into natural and manmade waterways. One example of this can be seen in 2017 aerial imagery of Fish Pass on Mustang Island which is completely blocked from sediment accretion between State Hwy 361 and the jetties at the Gulf -facing shoreline (see Figure 11-7). 16 Bureau of Economic Geology, 2007 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 11 1 Page Figure 11-7. Sediment Accretion of Fish Pass on Mustang Island (Google 2017) iillliiiiip!"'Y' Probability Coastal erosion is a continual process with erosion rates that vary over time. As stated above, the most significant cause of short-term coastal erosion is the effect of tropical storms and hurricanes. The annual probability of the occurrence of tropical storms and hurricane for the county and each participating jurisdiction is summarized in Section 5 of this plan. However, because any tropical storm or hurricane that enters the Gulf has an impact on coastal erosion for the entirety of the Gulf Coast the more representative probability for reoccurrence is summarized in the CEPRA 2015 report which indicates that three hurricanes impact the Texas Gulf Coast every four years. The Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin measured coastal shoreline erosion as a historical shoreline change rate based on averages over a 90 -year period. The results of this assessment indicate that 96.7% of Nueces County's Gulf - facing shoreline is experiencing a mean erosion rate of -1.7 feet/year. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 12 1 IIS ,n d' e Impact Coastal erosion results in the loss of agricultural, industrial, maritime shipping, commercial and recreational boating, residential land, public parks, wetlands and critical infrastructure. These impacts are experienced directly by the jurisdictions that border the Gulf; the coastal jurisdiction which include: unincorporated Nueces County, the City of Corpus Christi, the City of Port Aransas and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. Impacts on the remaining jurisdictions are indirect. The Texas GLO's Texas Coastal Resiliency Master Plan, dated March 2017, includes the following statement concerning impacts by coastal erosion, "if left unaddressed, will continue to have adverse impacts on infrastructure, natural resources, economic activities, and the health and safety of residents." A healthy beach and dune system can reduce damage to property and critical infrastructure by absorbing some of the energy from storm surges and waves. Beach and dune restoration projects to repair damage caused by coastal erosion are a continual economic burden for the coastal jurisdictions. Additionally, loss of coastal property and beaches may reduce property values and reduce tourism along the coast. Navigable waterways and small watercraft canal and channel systems, including the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), are impacted by sediment accretion. Dredging of major and minor channels to remove excess sediment to restore access for commercial and private ships is a constant economic strain on the coastal jurisdictions. Coastal erosion and accretion has a notable impact on the ports, coastal petrochemical facilities, road infrastructure, and commercial businesses. The inland jurisdictions, those that do not border the Gulf, may not be impacted directly by coastal erosion but they do experience indirect impacts. Indirect impacts include the economic impact of addressing coastal erosion issues. These costs are redistributed to the community through higher taxes, and increased cost of goods and services. Additionally, inland jurisdictions may rely on the coast for the opportunity of participating in and benefiting from the tourist industry which is directly impacted by the health of the beaches and dune systems. An example of the costs associated to the maintenance and restoration effort needed for addressing coastal erosion is shown as Table 11-5. This is the latest list of coastal restoration projects identified by the Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act (CEPRA). Of these nine projects, two have yet to be approved for funding. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 13 1Page Figure 11-8. Recent Nueces County CEPRA Funded Coastal Erosion Projects 1111 1 impoppmsmionntonnorK),Eem loolliniiiiinnumlontruismonn Mustang & NPI Beach Maintenance Impacts & Best Practices $ 100,000 ismorponmi na 3,111421„iio;rfulpoipur 8 2014-2015 1 Nis I n 2 Nueces River Delta Stabilization & Habitat Protection $ 322,500 na 3 McGee Beach Nourishment $ 269,000 na 4 Shamrock Island Habitat Protection & Enhancement Phase 2 na $ 1,856,800 5 Cole Park Shoreline Protection na $ 2,000,000 6 Indian Point Shoreline Stabilzation & Habitat Protection $ 750,000 na 7 2012-2013 7 Nueces Bay Portland Causway March Restoration $ 2,914,000 na 8 Nueces River Delta Stabilization & Habitat Protection $ 187,500 na 9 Corpus Christi Beach Nourishment $ 2,340,000 na Tota I $ 6,883,000 $ 3,856,800 $ 10,739,800 Source: CEPRA 2015 report (http://www.glo.texas gov/coast/coastal-management/forms/files/CEPRA-Report-2015.pdf) Vulnerability Private and public lands, infrastructure, and industry along the coast are directly vulnerable to the impacts of coastal erosion. The navigable waterways and small watercraft canal and channel systems, including the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), are directly vulnerable to the impacts of coastal erosion and accretion. The Texas GLO's Coastal Resiliency Master Plan identified key issues and proposed solutions to address Nueces County's vulnerability to coastal erosion. The resultant list of projects with associated costs are summarized in Table 11-6 and are shown in Figure 11-8. A prominent vulnerable asset within Nueces County is the Corpus Christi Ship Channel Entrance and Jetty Channel. The US Army Corps of Engineers recommended a FY2013 budget of $4.9M to dredge these areas to remove sedimentation to maintain the channel depth, and recommended an additional $3.2M to repair levees adjacent to Nueces Bay that were eroded by a storm event and wave action. Specific vulnerable assets are identified for each of the coastal jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 14 1Page Table 11-5. Strategies & Projects to Address Nueces County Coastal Vulnerabilities17 R3-3 R3-4 R3-5 R3-10 R3-12 R3-14 R3-15 ls1111,Ill%s\\ Mustang Island State Park Acquisition Indian Point Shoreline Protection Coastal Bend Gulf Barrier Island Conservation Portland Living Shoreline Dagger Island Living Shoreline Flour Bluff Living Shoreline R3-11 Nueces County Hydrologic Restoration Study R3-9 Corpus Christi & Nueces Bays Oyster Reef Restoration R3-6 Shamrock Island Restoration - Phase 2 R3-16 Causeway Island Rookery Habitat Protection 17 Texas GLO's Coastal Resiliency Master Plan, March 2017 171111 $3M - $8M $3M - $10M $0.5M - $2M $0.5M - $1.5M $1M - $3.5M $1M - $2.5M $1.5M - $4.5M $0.5M - $2.5M Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 $1M - $10M $6M - $18M $0.5M - $2M 151Pa Figure 11-9. Map of Projects to Address Nueces County Vulnerabilities18 %i. tfr Y. ,H. +dna orxurvU A ;n+a+nxn V It t 1Ni - ri,,,cy a W�" `" tx1 r olorw+ t'tuttra� diem (ightirto Sho lineA4 t gy Proloot 1. t t10 ^t t;wl u Nt iPitt t1W444 0 "Yt"lrettlpind &tk�; �Ytlt NN!4Iv 1t)o"Y"• jot Roo Crenin "A8a don trolYu ry m41, 18 Texas GLO's Coastal Resiliency Master Plan, March 2017 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 16 1 Page Unincorporated Nueces County Coastal Erosion Hazard SSSSSS\M Gulf -Facing Shoreline 0 Miles Laguna, Bays, and Islands 169 Miles SSSS\SltdtaSSS\S ISSISSISIIIMEMEMErranSMM �))���������� ISSIMMISSMSS ISSUEMISS N/A N/A N/A mastl,\11��������������� different rates along the coast line. lsssssrzmsassl..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, lsssssttmmrmttnssss irsim sun 75 100 TEXAS COAST EVERY 4 YEARS ltlrir; 100 11111 \1 �1 1111 ;ISSSS 1 011111�00� �� �� ��� 11 � � 1111111 1�01���,1»��1,���,,,IIS,,y�,t,���10���� �t � . Ifl�fl�� ,� . �„ fl � � � �„m � �t �t � �� �� »r R . �„ �� flim .ill 11� ,1I�i��� lol� l� �0111.1�� �� �» 1 � � Illi�i 111 Illi 1� .11111 111 �1\1��������„lig„��,�,��,,,��,,,,������������ ��������,�;,��11���������� 3 HURRICANES IMPACT THE N/A 96.7% N/A 29.1% N/A issss.ssztmrrrazns.s\ss. lastammintatal lastammtlasa istettmal scurcal sivanal itztran $35,252,463 $2,206,466 827.9 $203,140.27 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 11 17 1Page Figure 11-10. Nueces County Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast •,y wW o11111111111111110111111111111111 1 jWlii'Qi,iio^ mil .1111. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111! 10,1111111; 1,1l 11111100000 01[1000VIII 01110100101100,0 1100001000000000110100 pc BCWIYAYLi&,, 111cre ws Nt5warm, 1105.0 we Ca0xy01 kluiti-Juriacrintion800 hszsrd 00Aitlwiplhxtur¢.dicswm Plan C111,1411.10 i,.'1, 1a,!• mpar. II Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 18 1 P 000000 10000 0Y City of Agua Dulce Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 19 1 If" a City of Bishop Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 20 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard Gulf -Facing Shoreline Laguna, Bays, and Islands 17.6 Miles 280 Miles ISSSSSIIMISSSS% SSSSSSCZMMMIMltrraSS )���������� -8 different rates along the coast line. + 4.9 ents,A. -1.55 lsssssrzz,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, lsssssrttnmrmttnssss irsina sun 75 100 TEXAS COAST EVERY 4 YEARS IIWPIVIITSSSSNN 1\1�1 111 1\1 `111111 11\����0�����0�������1��\��1��11�,1,,;;„11111\1y1\\\1„1vfl�����\��bX11 >1 ��t�. �� ��,�.�„fl� � �� � � � �„ �� fl,m r� TR . �„ ��flim�” � �1I >\ �1�1 1 11� ��1�1 1 �» \ 1 � 111i�i 111 111i� 1� . ...111 1 ...111 ��� ��������� ��„�li�,�,����,��„�,���\11\���� ���������������� � �li�,�����\11\��\11\1�1� 3 HURRICANES IMPACT THE 17.6 96.7% 17.0 29.1% 5.1 Islassztartmumssiss issmazinr maw isssvtnnnass surnall num= itztran $324,781,580 $358,874,057 509.4 5124,990.53 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 21 1 Page Figure 11-11. Corpus Christi Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast lir di ip 714,Y,21.7111 1 5 i:1:1051 5011, L Lockwood. A,ndmmwln' fh wwaa.ako.Nn c, Counly C11: Muki-,11z1adictiona1 Hazard m.1111gaton Ad:',t9P.9m'Reev.r, •i am �,. al� AL r. -e :"Wwowrn Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 22 1 P ,n d' e City of Driscoll Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 23 1 If" a City of Petronila Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 24 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Coastal Erosion Hazard SSSSSS\M EaSSISS Gulf -Facing Shoreline Laguna, Bays, and Islands ISSSSSSII 3 Miles 16 Miles ISSSSSIWMIMMMZEIMEISSSMM ))���������� 111 SIN ISM ISM 1111111 + 1.6 different rates along the coast line. +8 + 4.8 mas,\A‘. slasss.surnass...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ltuEgzlsntrtatassissminaznionassassmx sun 75 100 TEXAfirz, YEARS II 32131 v`�� �b VIII� ��„ �t� �.��,���,�„ �� flim�I �����1�.11111 111,�,��,,,��,,,,����������������,�;,���„�,�,���\11\��\11\1�1� 3HURRICANES IMPACT THE 3 96.7% 2.9 29.1% 0.9 sass.sztartmuntass. ssuammintnasi sastannumans istrtnausintmallavanni ltztran; $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 25 1 Page Figure 11-12. Port Aransas Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast Loos sled. Andrews OLiftily MiAti-logiadtitionalf hazard 1agaIion Action -i;^Nan „w;rmr;.. C Cluairs lit E frtlkieul, uWl Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 26 1 If" ,n e City of Robstown Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 27 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard ISSSSSIEMISSSS Gulf -Facing Shoreline 20.6 Miles Laguna, Bays, and Islands 464 Miles Navigable Waterways and Channels 36 Miles InStattlan MISS N/A N/A N/A manx1.111.1‘. different rates along the coast line. lssssssnnnsssss,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ssssssxwrmttmrtmnsss 11101•1111111S %WM 75 100 sassamamittatammiliiiiiiia 3 HURRICANES IMPACT THE um; 1X111 t 1.. ro,1 � 1� � �� �i .., � l� �� 1U �_���� 1 fl� ,,. � � �� 1>i 111o211„g 11 111 1 11 1 . X1111 . 1ti 0 ,�V�,�,����„�„���\�����\\ N/A 96.7% N/A 29.1% N/A Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 11 28 1 Page lssssstatrnttrtnssss. astammintrass sssltnntmasss „ u0 �o� �mnsam 1 m ma. � � 1�. ,��i�.^ �„ 9�"`., 1P.. ,��i�im �. AI � ,�� 53�i�oa es3 5as1�imam 3 53ze iia eossstswmatsssu ssssrnrmasss Corpus Christi Ship Channel Navigable Waterway La Quinta Channel Navigable Waterway Jewel Fulton Canal Rincon Canal Intercoastal Waterway Navigable Waterway Navigable Waterway Navigable Waterway Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 29 1 If" a Figure 11-13. Port of Corpus Christi Jurisdiction Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast 11141111:11:1141J,,,, 11111111 r a IM'"'"" IMIIIIM """III i �� �Il �lw ugm ul, N Po111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lin 00000000000000000001 al v 1 101 �llil lh lri OCbrluV410,1 44114 .940141111 r'7'14+I.11o1wMY11M, IINte.. Il"M"°o11Io'C4'"s C ouV, 4)1., .,,a0t,;k' IRazittal Nqt9il'4'r'Ur A,M6l3'fl irryr�,�i Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 30 1 P ,n d' e pou 44"11111199N111111111 1m I! 1m �i 11mmm ( 1�� (i Tornado Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard 13 City of Bishop Tornado Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard 16 City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard 18 City of Petronila Tornado Hazard 20 City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard 21 City of Robstown Tornado Hazard 25 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard 27 Tornado Hazard Overview Description A tornado is a violently rotating column of air extending between, and in contact with, a cloud and the surface of the earth. Tornadoes have wind speeds of 250 miles per hour or more. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide and 50 miles long. Location Tornadoes do not have any specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to tornado activity. According to FEMA Wind Zones in the United States, Nueces County is located in Wind Zone III, associated to winds as high as 200 mph. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 1 1 If" ,n Figure 12-1. FEMA Wind Zones in the United States f Z .THE UNITE STAT.' /* qp ma, SII 4' oillolopoo 0,111011011111110,10,10,11111111111111111 19401019,101, 1111111 ho opoo ^ro��,wyg �rw4��rM iJ//�J Extent Ilmdll4* 011410911 WOW 11U uwvd M 0rts l000, 1411P 3164,11401W 0,661 *AM WiMM1R11431N V rtlriuWf040, 1161 ZOC ZONE EB 1"40 wohp 111 EOi1 4 IV ZONE Ei vtorq NUECES COUNTY Doonloolloolovoloolo Tornado damage is currently defined using the Enhanced Fujita Scale which took effect on February 1st, 2007; the preceding scale was called the Fujita Tornado Damage Scale. The Enhanced Fujita Scale is summarized in Table 12-1. The Enhanced Fujita Scale has 28 Damage Indicators (DI), or types of structures and vegetation, each with a varying number of Degrees of Damage (DoD). Damage Indicators are summarized in Table 12-2. Each Damage Indicator has a unique Degree of Damage Scale. For example, Small Barns and Farm Outbuildings (SBO) Degree of Damage Scale is provided as Table 12-3. For unique Degree of Damage Scales for the remaining Damage Indicators refer to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website (http://www.spc.noaa.qov/faq/tornado/ef-scale.htm I). Based upon the planning area's location in Wind Zone III, which can see winds up to 200 miles per hour, the most powerful tornado the planning area can expect to experience is an EF5. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 2 1 If" ,n Table 12-1. Enhanced Fujita Scale1 %Al Alt \ Minor or no damage. Peels surface off some roofs; some damage to EFO 65 85 56.88% gutters or siding; branches broken off trees; shallow - rooted trees pushed over. Confirmed tornadoes with no reported damage (i.e., those that remain in open fields) are always rated EFO. Moderate damage. Roofs severely stripped; mobile homes overturned EF1 86 - 110 31.07% or badly damaged; loss of exterior doors; windows and other glass broken. Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well -constructed houses; foundations EF2 111- 135 8.80% of frame homes shifted; mobile homes completely destroyed; large trees snapped or uprooted; light - object missiles generated; cars lifted off ground. Severe damage. Entire stories of well -constructed houses destroyed; EF3 136 165 2.51% severe damage to large buildings such as shopping malls; trains overturned; trees debarked; heavy cars lifted off the ground and thrown; structures with weak foundations are badly damaged. Extreme damage. Well -constructed and whole frame EF4 166 - 200 0.66% houses completely leveled; cars and other large objects thrown up to 300 feet and small missiles generated. Total destruction of buildings. Strong -framed, well-built houses leveled off foundations are swept away; steel -reinforced EFS > 200 0.08% concrete structures are critically damaged; tall buildings collapse or have severe structural deformations; some cars, trucks and train cars can be thrown approximately 1 mile. 1NOAA % M rdr UUR� rrr �iit0;1&i',%%%"%/////' ommwm u,1"11"11' looi 11111.4v0,00 r)1111{)1\ 110,0,1111111111 1 41111110101,111111,1,11111101111111,11000,1111111111001110 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 3 1 If" a Table 12-2. Damage Indicators Small barns, farm outbuildings (SBO) 2 One- or two-family residences (FR12) 3 Single -wide mobile home (MHSW) 4 Double -wide mobile home (MHDW) 5 Apt, condo, townhouse (3 stories or less) 6 Motel (M) 7 Masonry apt. or motel (MAM) 8 Small retail bldg. (fast food) (SRB) 9 Small professional (doctor office, branch bank) (SPB) 10 Strip mall (SM) 9 11 Large shopping mall (LSM) 9 12 Large, isolated ("big box") retail bldg. (LIRB) 7 13 Automobile showroom (ASR) 8 14 Automotive service building (ASB) 8 15 School - 1 -story elementary (interior or exterior halls) (ES) 10 16 School - jr. or sr. high school (JHSH) 11 17 Low-rise (1-4 story) bldg. (LRB) 7 18 Mid -rise (5-20 story) bldg. (MRB) 10 19 High-rise (over 20 stories) (HRB) 10 20 Institutional bldg. (hospital, govt. or university) (IB) 11 21 Metal building system (MBS) 8 22 Service station canopy (SSC) 6 23 Warehouse (tilt -up walls or heavy timber) (WHB) 7 24 Transmission line tower (TLT) 6 25 Free-standing tower (FST) 3 26 Free standing pole (light, flag, luminary) (FSP) 3 27 Tree — hardwood (TH) 5 28 Tree — softwood (TS) 5 Virrrzol1\��11V�uu��1111�� 8 10 9 12 6 10 7 8 9 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 4 1 If" a Table 12-3. Small Barns and Farm Outbuildings (SBO) 11?11\111111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Threshold of visible damage Loss of wood or metal roof panels Collapse of doors Major loss of roof panels Uplift or collapse of roof structures Collapse of walls Overturning or sliding of entire structure Total destruction of building Occurrences 62 74 83 90 93 97 99 112 11111\\1`t,»�»'';;fiV�11V11����1�' 53 61 68 78 77 81 83 94 78 91 102 110 114 119 118 131 Tornado producing storms can occur at any time of year and at any time of day, but they are typically more common in the spring months during the late afternoon and evening hours. A smaller high frequency period can emerge in the fall during the brief transition between the warm and cold seasons. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers For Environmental Information Storm Event Database Nueces County has experienced 108 (recorded) tornado events over the course of the record period from 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 (66 years). Table 12- 4 includes a summary of tornado events from 1950 to 2006 using the Fujita Scale and Table 12-5 summarizes tornado events from 2007 to 2016 using the latest magnitude scale the Enhanced Fujita Scale. Table 12-6 includes a comprehensive list of all tornadoes on record within Nueces County. Historical tornado events are mapped for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 12-4. Historical Tornado Occurrence Summary, 1950-2006 Stt%%%%%WMZIVEE%%%%%%%%M. tra S1M NM NMI INISAIM 95 8 46 29 11 1 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 5 1 If" ,n Table 12-5. Historical Tornado Occurrence Summary, 2007-2016 tiAtti ISSISS1 Mar 11 • TIM SSSSSS 13 0 10 3 0 0 117\11N. Corpus Christi Nueces Co Port Aransas Robstown Robstown Robstown Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Nueces Co Robstown Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 �1�111\1�11111111\111\1�`� ����� 7/28/1953 8/31/1953 10/23/1953 5/11/1955 5/11/1955 6/22/1955 10/4/1956 10/12/1959 4/26/1960 8/8/1960 10/16/1960 10/16/1960 2/5/1961 4/29/1961 6/18/1961 6/18/1961 8/21/1962 7/17/1964 3/30/1965 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 5/7/1968 5/9/1968 5/9/1968 1015 2025 1515 1030 1030 1515 1330 1030 30 1100 1200 1310 940 1245 1500 1500 1300 2344 540 820 925 1129 1129 1444 1445 2245 1220 1230 '‘\\."1,1 FO FO F2 FO F1 FO F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F2 FO F2 F2 F1 F1 FO F1 F2 FO FO FO FO FO FO FO F2 \\\ASAI\ IA %NU WIN $250 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 $25,000 $2,500 $2,500 $25,000 $250,000 $2,500 $25,000 $25,000 $250 $2,500 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 1 $250 0 $0 1 $25,000 so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 6 1 If" a Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 (cont.) X01111 4 111111111\'��1��������������\�\�\1\ Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Nueces Co Robstown Robstown Robstown Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Driscoll Corpus Christi Nueces Co m �1�111\111111111\111\1�1`��`�� 5/9/1968 5/9/1968 5/9/1968 5/11/1968 9/16/1968 5/12/1969 10/12/1969 10/12/1969 10/12/1969 5/22/1970 6/24/1970 6/25/1970 5/10/1971 8/6/1971 8/6/1971 4/27/1972 4/27/1972 6/2/1972 6/13/1973 8/13/1973 8/13/1973 6/13/1974 7/13/1974 9/21/1974 9/28/1974 5/24/1975 4/20/1976 4/28/1976 5/7/1976 6/25/1976 6/25/1976 7/8/1976 7/8/1976 7/14/1976 8/17/1976 8/18/1976 1245 1335 1345 600 1745 1600 1730 1730 1730 919 1650 945 1625 1200 1200 1220 1250 135 1220 1005 1146 1400 1256 914 1645 1115 755 644 950 1100 1125 1136 1730 1345 1205 1200 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F2 FO FO FO F3 FO F1 F1 F1 F1 FO F1 FO FO FO FO FO FO F1 FO F1 F2 FO F1 FO F1 �a �a�� »�� �»��� »��ii iii i ��` '1'x'''1'°'�������'��„���,1�,�� 0 $2,500 0 $30 0 $25,000 0 $0 0 $25,000 0 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 15 $250,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $250 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $30 0 $30 0 $0 0 $2,500 0 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $25,000 0 $0 0 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 UMW so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 (cont.) 111111 Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Bishop Port Aransas Bishop Nueces Co Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Robstown Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Robstown Petronila Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Port Aransas Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co 9/7/1976 8/21/1978 8/25/1978 8/9/1980 8/9/1980 8/10/1980 8/10/1980 8/29/1981 8/29/1981 11/9/1986 9/16/1988 9/16/1988 4/17/1992 4/17/1992 5/31/1992 6/2/1992 8/25/1992 6/2/1994 8/5/1994 9/12/1994 8/1/1995 8/23/1995 9/20/1996 6/17/1997 9/22/1998 10/6/2000 12/26/2000 10/24/2002 10/24/2002 7/5/2003 9/2/2005 7/7/2007 9/29/2007 3/6/2008 3/18/2008 6/2/2010 xply 755 1320 900 1530 2130 400 1730 1430 1530 1242 1630 2000 1255 1315 1255 615 955 935 1325 1930 1555 1739 1200 1645 1048 1500 1430 1319 1441 215 1252 1640 1140 1458 1340 2215 "\\."1\.1 FO FO F1 F2 F2 F1 FO F1 FO FO F1 FO FO FO F1 FO FO FO FO FO FO F1 FO FO FO F2 F1 FO FO EFO EFO EF1 EFO EFO ,A111% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 011\1111\\�1��1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAW k $0 V'' $0 $0 $250,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $2,500 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $5,000 $20,000 $50,000 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 $1,000 8 10", a Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 (cont.) Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co 11 1 6/30/2010 1/9/2011 5/8/2012 5/10/2012 6/2/2013 5/15/2015 5/24/2015 9/26/2015 1330 329 715 2120 950 1205 27 1415 \\.1\17 EFO EFO EF1 EFO EFO EFO EFO EF1 EFO \\\ASM\I B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AAA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��;u�y�1�y10�11�111�»111,u��1 onmc 11111% $0 $5,000,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $25,000 $750,000 $0 ViORV LILA so so so so so so so so Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of tornado events in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. Note, historical events are documented as a function of the origin of the touchdown location. A Tornado may travel over several jurisdictions; however, the tornado event is solely recorded for the jurisdiction of the tornado origin. Table 12-7 provides a general overview of tornado severity, probability, impacts, and defining characteristics. Probability for future tornado events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 12-7. Tornado Severity Defined ISSIV MSS 69% of all tornadoes Less than 5% of tornado deaths Lifetime 1-10+ minutes Winds less than 110 mph ISSIMISSI\ 29% of all tornadoes Nearly 30% of all tornado deaths May last 20 minutes or longer Winds 110— 205 mph 11111111' \ASS 2% of all tornadoes 70% of all tornado deaths Lifetime can exceed one hour Winds greater than 205 mph Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 Impact Tornados impacts are documented by the number of deaths, injuries, property damage, and crop damage. Table 12-8 provides a summary of impacts for Nueces County as a whole. Impacts to the county and participating jurisdictions is documented in the following sections. Tornadoes, depending upon extent, can destroy anything they come into contact with. Due to the unpredictable locations of tornado touchdowns, it is difficult to identify assets or populations within jurisdictions that are particularly vulnerable to tornadoes. Due to those two facts, all assets, property, and populations within the planning area are considered vulnerable to tornadoes. Properties within the planning area may experience power outages or other utility failures even if they're not destroyed during a tornado event. Homes destroyed by tornadoes will lead to displaced populations. Crops and commercial property destroyed in tornado events will have negative economic impacts. Table 12-8. Historical Tornado Impacts Summary, 1950-2016 108 2 1 Atit A ‘N\I\I 49 $97,408,590 $1,000 Vulnerability Tornadoes typically cross jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in and around Nueces County are exposed to tornado hazard and are at potential risk of impact. The damage caused by a tornado is typically a result of high wind velocity, wind-blown debris, lightning, and large hail. Vulnerability of humans and property is difficult to evaluate given that tornadoes form at different strengths and in random locations. Property damage is typically most significant for structures of light construction. Three types of structures are more likely to suffer damage: manufactured homes, homes on crawlspaces (more susceptible to lift), and buildings with large spans, such as shopping malls, gymnasiums, and factories. Vulnerability is defined for the county and participating jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 10 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard SSSSSS\ZISSS\SS County Wide (Unincorporated ISSSSSMZMI IntattaSSM 111 St 11 It It It at Sal linSiU11111111111111k�������11111 Val WS 1121 11111t1101 11 111 11111 1111@ 1 11111111���\11\1\�1111�1� 11,,,1>111,,,1111111,. w 1���11111 1 1�0 ,,,�11 11 ��111 � � w1 1�, 33 goo » � �� u 111101110 fi 11111 1111. 1 0111 X111 11 1 1 � 1 �` 111��1111111 1 ���111� 1 1 �1�11� ll� �� 11a X0111 �� l � 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 sssysstrzrs\sss.........................................................xz\\\\:\ntzrzzzmvmslvtasu 37 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 1.8 YEARS SSISSSSM\SSS% 111111111SIST1111111111111111111111211111 37 1 16 $413,000 ssssssFrtmsssli. 111 11111111111tell 15,274 $373,034,606 $487,429,634 345,880.3 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 12 11 1 If" a Figure 12-2. Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1111 �u' 100001 1aliilllhluII 11111111111111111111 oom 000000000000000000000 moor 1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 1).11111111111111111 ta�u� 11� Ilftllll ,u, o 111111,11. lllllllllllllll�����' MI 8040190, 111111111111111111111 R 1� 111 II1I,11ii��IIIIIIIIIIP tAWAIv y' Qd, MI II IAV iMovr,men, 4rw, !!Apjrt bon ACI:Ort Man WJdrC,Cut%Coon 't,° wd�rem N,tda Sesgo "X"10 1^444, qccr,% C uiorl y fi'wrxkac'0 "Ir?aCk$ Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 12 1 113 ,n d m' City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard SSSSSS1M City Wide ISSS%%%%ttaS\SS%%% ISSSSSSMEE111Z1ZRSSSSSM\. NS NS SAI It WWII NM NM MN NM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ...................................................................................:..................................................................... zEzxztcnEMIS.M1 Agua Dulce occupies approx. 0.03% of the planning area. Assuming that the entire planning area is equally 0 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 vulnerable to tornadoes, Agua Dulce would be expected to experience approx. 0.0004 tornadoes annually or one tornado every 2,500 years. SSSSSSMS 0 0 0 $0 Vr' =iTMia�� IMMNISICIMMISSISISMEMMISSI ttit.\\I\ 11111111\11112111,111111111a 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 2.45 $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 13 1 If” a Figure 12-3. City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) I� �I �l llIllI�1iI � I I�II�I��lll I 1 ' 0�I t�l �"II T'l� �lllI°l�lljV�j��Jf�M1 ���rfrrl'� II1IIIIIII' .nn�nIrrrrrrrrrrrrassnanrnanrrnanranansnsnanrn„n,�,,�.,,Ic"cl ,li',Ir�li I,�I, Iffy�1�11�11'IiilI11(lV,1I'Iu�� �Is1il I, 1( 1 1�rIJ1i1;11hI�I I 1J,1 11l1I m�iil�il�illili1li�illlll 11111 °°°°°°°°°°°°°°uuuutllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIll 1111��III�IIIIP!IIPIIIP!!1VIII ,p II 111111111111111111111111111111lllll1i 11 11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III II1�'l,l;l+i I 11 11 lil�(ppl1II111 Illll1 I11 �Vuuuunnununununununuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuw uui 11 1 I IllifI 1, 1II1II`IIIII(I uulii11ll�11,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111:,;,,,,,,,,,, IIII1I,LII 111111111 11 111H �l ,11111111111111111111.11$111111111111111 111111111111111 u I11111111 Y Aowa IOtAtik, 111 III 1111111 i. 111111 uuuu N11111111111111111'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'11111 1111$$1111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIII I$1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 uulllll Il 11 e,„ )11 1111 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII 11111 11 ,r111: h II III llll11111111® A!I 1 1141 r rI1n1- a+onq'M ,4,911,10 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 14 1 P ,n d', City of Bishop Tornado Hazard SSSSSZ a ISSIS City Wide SSSSS.IWMZrMlataSSMS.SM. NMSISIIIIININ MU 0 tt 1111 al NM NMI 111 al NM WM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ssssssz=nsss szi, gm= vallsizati 4 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 16.5 YEARS W.:...:: 111111,111ISIT ,"ISM WM MI 37 0 0 $2,777,500 ISS%%%%%!Z %AM \ ISINT NISSIZIE1 laSSI itA: till 1, ,d. ,�, SIN 11111.1 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 539.02 $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 15 1 If" a Figure 12-4. City of Bishop Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1111111111111111111111111"1111111111111111111,1„1„.„„„„ �`1:.!):',,F,1,1:1,1111,111111111111'1,11111 �TI�Pf"A';11ui , 11l!1IIII? nlui 111 ullllllllllll 11 Ih 1111 .�PGe�lll��,id rax,,llam 1m�Y 0.11.1 �� Il II Illllllllli 111111111111111111111111 i. I IIII10 li ��Illjl tVl' III( 1111,11 111 ";, , P'! 11111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 11111 1IQ mon ooh, )))!IN'!'dp a C�� p uoimmimu I'ql�� d�l� �1 1111111111111111 ' uu i' ui iiip I11II 11�� i���� as �,i jI�iiiiiiilii111111111111111111111111 iii�"' IIV'+IIIIII'ii'ilil II I4lu1�,1 �II1�� 1I(IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111,0! h s �111,1, V��I�nl�il�l'�4 doolPoll11011111111111 '' 010IiIli10111IIVillll11? ����ulll I�uulluuu u11uu11,110 III I Lmoor soom, Atooimm, Numom,aimw. 4iwu.. 41,4 „4„1111 m•n',,'u "1v” Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 16 1 IIP a d' e City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard City Wide SSSSSSISVMEEMM11SSSS\W Mr g":"^` 11111 MI NM 11111 &,ry�lf'YsIMENLIIIM UN UM 8 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 SSSSSSS\IEZMS\SSS ITEM SIM 51 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 1.3 YEARS cantami sum= �mem= 51 1 30 $91,660,590 l'‘sA\nss\\\ts-tftnrltttslslpsamkNa\sirruliititzurm stati lull\m4 65%\)%1\11A% 8 2 $6324,074 $7,007, 4632.44 ,044,01 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 17 1 If" a Figure 12-5. City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1111111"11 11111111 ill 41 111000000001 11111111 4.4, 1;,io'wgm9!wS„1411114lr 11'4,41310'1d P'tiut',I^g744 (1,1110lanly ✓q, IMk4wvArvry , . d;Y f " "nl^ " 11,11 1 ..,„., umnimilmmumiu Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 18 1 P a d', m' City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard SSSSSZ a n\SSS 0 City Wide SSSSSSMZIIIMIMRSSMSSM 1114 1111 RI II 111 Al 0 0 0 0 � �..........ra,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fir.,,.,_............... 111 I N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ssssszz=nssss xvirca v suzzam 1 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 66 YEARS SS%%%%%!E 11111111 W..:: MI 1111111111111311111 0 �0 lan• Mit�SS�� � IV �, ,d. ,�, s%%AM \lane g��2111 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 464.67 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 19 1 If" a Figure 12-6. City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 11I1111111111110111111111111111111110111011011111 01001101 ,41 orloror roorroorroor ,1011111111100 H111dJ!W 1111IrllOrrrrrrr1rrI pp Illllilllli 1� III 1)111 II III`. PI�' IIII�1� I1 Ilii ���� illlllllllllllllllll III` \���!` III 1 � '11111111111'1'1'11111 1 I;11 191�hII$ III IVlgl :HO 19 � 1' ILII Ile uuuuuuuw - IIUlm II 111111IIIIIIIu 11 �I 1111111 II! OrrorrorrOrrOrrOrrOrrOrr 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 oI1111 Iff111111111 li d 1111111 uI11111111111 11111111111111'1'1100000 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111ii 11'11 '1'1 .111111111111111111111111.„, „I 1 iii 1,�huhl�llllll111111111101'lll11IIUIIIII IIIp111111111p1p1IiI" I , Illuulllll111111llllll llllll111111liii dill ;1IIIIIIIIIIIhIh111111111111111111111111111111111 . 1V 111 I111if �jI1,10 II11I 11muuuuuuuu111l 11111 1111 1Il11 11 1 1111 1111111111111111111111111111 111�1'' '1111 111111111 111Iuu111111111111111111111111 11,11 111,1,1101,110110000,0, rur o 11,11 oor ol Or Or IP �IIhlJlll IHMON idllldl n li "" Ivo vvvvvvvvvvvvlvvvvlvvvi1""lvvvll I rr II MINIonmnocor A:, ,uQru Nor, *troop Notroorrooros, County Dor II!Lcroro011 d.urms4-r 'i'rrau�!m Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 20 1 P ,n d', mo City of Petronila Tornado Hazard SSSSSSI MISSISS City Wide SSSSS.SS ISSSSSMMMMIZSSSS 1114 1111 II littl II la 1111 o 111111111411 I? Int 11 at I al It 1 al VIMIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 isssss=nssss xim cm= v sizzati 1 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 66 YEARS \\INit rwmv \ %\.\\ \t\ Ut% 1 0 0 $0 $0 ISSISS \\1\112 Et It A\ %AM \ ISSIr lanai RS% ISSW IVICI lane II 111111111St 1St St Mil 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 926.66 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 21 1 If" a Figure 12-7. City of Petrolina Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1 IliI,I�V111111'111111111111'1 'AI'IIiII 1 hl'111111111,11111111111,1111111.111111111 11111111111111110,01110,10,„111.111 11111 111111,0011 Illaul l 111111 111111 puuuuulll 1111:11:111:11:11 �II I ,'I IJ I'I+I1uVi1hh i�lu � IIIIII uIII lii!P�'ul'dIIlll"lii"iIi'u� l 'I'IW' 1I i 'II 1 ern "0001111111111111111 1111111111111111111111 1111111 1J N1111111111111111111,1,1,1,11,11„1„„„„„„„„ 1`�I1 �'11 !11111 I�I"Il Ohi II III00II0[IIIVII III W II j'' J IIIIIIIIIIIIVIII IuI IIIIIIII V! 1I ,1011110 0011 im 111111'10.0111111111'1'11 i . I I 1111111111111 IIIIIIIIII I 00100 11111!111111111 N °III ! I 11111111111111111111 alb 00,000,000,101,11 plh.�100001, 111111111111111110111111011 IIII ,wl I 000001 1 �III �� 11111111111 l• I00000000010!0 101110 111 11111 1 1IwIIIIiI ' I I i',[1,,,,,,11'1111111111101111111 Vllll.• 11i111111111111111111111111111111111101 I' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I� 000.0 011,11,1011 001 111111011111111[0111""1"(11111111111'1111111111111111111'1111 UII111m10,1I1 II1111111 1111111111V14I11 11 10101111001 IIIIp 1111 1 111 10001 1111111111111111111111111111111011 V J 11111111111111 1911111111111;I';IIiV� 11 !I 0'1.0' 111111[00 00000000000000000000000000000101010101010101010111110111 11u0001[0:110jjjjj11 1111111111111111111111111 111111111.111,1,1:1:1 11"".111"1111111111.11.. li'lli111111),110101.111111 ,11"11111 0111 11 11100 10 111111111111111111111111 111011111,111,111,111,111,111,1,11 """" ""10 11111111111111010101100„„„100000000000,100, 1111 111111 11111111111111111111 111011 111101 011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111010101101111111111111 0111011010111 11 11111111111111 1111 111111111111111111 1 111 iII 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII 000000000000001111111111111 viol 1 .00011111N1 )011110 1 , ., 0 000JIp, 0$1miw'alim'aw"m.0P H4001001010101 IP.w:'*'"'u114C'@'IM,:n1r'h 111.00,001 40.10.0.10. l 410 000004 P 'rP!!'V:w104.4 ;I11 111111 .I 11111111111111111111111111111',::',1111111111111111111111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 22 1 IIP ,n City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard SSSSSItaln\n\SS 10 1 X10\117a\, 111 11 �� 1 1 011 1 a� ��t f 1 City Wide SSSSSSMMMMIZSSMSSM 1114 ICA 11111 1111S o z o 0 � �..........ra,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fir.,,.,_............... TrATZLINISTIMITIIMITIMNII 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 sssssszt=nssss 11 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 6 YEARS SSSSSSS%S% W.:...:: 111111111ISIT ,"ISM WM MI 11 0 3 $2,555,000 ISSISSITI I I %AM ISSIT arlanelaSSI Mit�SS�N 1111111S � "gig 1St 3,955 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 23 1 If" a Figure 12-8. City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 144°01'111.111111111 111111111111111fMA Pot Ada: unity Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 24 1 P a City of Robstown Tornado Hazard SSS\SltaISSSSS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 10 a �I1111110101 1111\\\1111,111. 111111\ 1 1 1 1 1� 0t1 1 1 �111��1 � II�1�1 � 1 w �11�\\\1 011\\, 11 1� a�\ 1 0 City Wide SSSSSSMMMMIZSSMSSM 1114 ICA Illtt IR UM s o 0 0 � �..........ra,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fir.,,.,_............... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ISSSSSE..........:.....................................................................EIMITIME 1111111n1 10 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 6.6 YEARS 66 URI 111111111ISIMI WM MI 10 0 0 $0 lna\SSS\1 MEM n\SSSS\\.\\\ %AM Ental 11111n� qtr wee 11,576 $151,390,423 $183,445,540 6580.37 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 12 25 1 If" a Figure 12-9. City of Robstown Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1 »»»»»»l>kwU " ,1111 ;, Illlllllllllllllnl1 I I ,1,1,1,1,11111,1,111,111111111111111111111,1,11,111 0000ll000llmoov000vvov 1.I ,111,1,11110 INN' III ...!!!!!!!!!!!!1:1111,11", p lr 94' Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 26 1 P Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard SSSSSS\n ISSISS 1 Jurisdiction Wide SSSSSSMZIIIMIMRSSMSSM 1114 1111 RI II 111 Al o o 0 tin a,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fi.,,.,_............... 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 The Port of Corpus Christi experienced four of the 51 tornadoes that took place within the City of Corpus Christi from 1950 — ASSI................................................lEIMITIMEMSSIIM1 4 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 16.5 YEARS .11111111, 1111 ��,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,,;�;,,,,,,,,,,. 5,insfifi$�S1111111WIrstx,,:� »»SA;;,iifi�i 0 0 0 $51,000 11"1111111114\ .�„ 1171,11\11111111% °;iii.,,_.1174,026,681 ISSUillniS111.1 N/A Industrial Area *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 12 27 1 If" a Figure 12-10. Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) .4:6111., • 11111 11-111,111111111, 1111,11.1 141, ,111.1.1A111)))),1111t4111.1.111 ool000h000000vvo 44)11,11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 000 giwiury'BPol Nwownerri, LA'@'bU71d ¢ C 41 ¢'i"d 7,.,,1 o 'u¢or"I,co Acton Pi n Moroi nup ;Vu, „ua ROW licadlo 'N Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 28 1 P ,n d' m' ri 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 01« i m11111111111 imlllli ii Hailstorm Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hailstorm Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Hailstorm Hazard 12 City of Bishop Hailstorm Hazard 13 City of Corpus Christi Hailstorm Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Hailstorm Hazard 15 City of Petronila Hailstorm Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hailstorm Hazard 17 City of Robstown Hailstorm Hazard 18 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hailstorm Hazard 19 Hailstorm Hazard Overview Description Hail is a form of precipitation that occurs when updrafts in thunderstorms carry raindrops upward into extremely cold areas of the atmosphere where they freeze into ice. Nearly all severe thunderstorms produce hail aloft, though it may melt before reaching the ground. Multi -cell thunderstorms produce many hailstones, but not usually large hailstones. In the life cycle of the multi -cell thunderstorm, the mature stage is relatively short so there is not much time for growth of the hailstone. Supercell thunderstorms have sustained updrafts that support large hail formation by repeatedly lifting the hailstones into the very cold air at the top of the thunderstorm cloud. In general hail 2 inches (5 cm), a little larger than golf ball, or larger in diameter is associated with supercells. Non-supercell storms are capable of producing golf ball size hail. In all cases, the hail falls when the thunderstorm's updraft can no longer support the weight of the ice. The stronger the updraft the larger the hailstone can growl. 1 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 1 1 If" ,n Figure 13-1: Hail Development within a Thunderstorm im TT 1 LIV H 1 II H r ‚ 1 1 LY r Location 11 UIUUIUII Hailstorms do not have any specific geographic boundaries and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to damage from hailstorms. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action PIan - Section 13 2 1 Extent Much of the damage inflicted by hail is to crops. Even relatively small hail can shred plants to ribbons in a matter of minutes. Vehicles, roofs of buildings and homes, and landscaping are the other things most commonly damaged by hail. Hail has been known to cause injury to humans, and occasionally has been fatal. There have been no recorded fatalities or Injuries in the region. Hail size is estimated by comparing it to a known object. Most hailstorms are made up of a mix of sizes, and only the very largest hail stones pose serious risk to people caught in the open. Hail of quarter size and larger is considered severe. The extent of hailstorm is uniform across the region Historically, hailstones almost three inches in diameter have fallen in the planning area. For future planning purposes, all participating jurisdictions can expect hailstones up to three inches in diameter. Figure 13-2: Hail Size Comparison Chart2 Size Camped .:on Chart ApOmpiprAgyr gpAr ■ ift 4111111111111111111111111111111 10y)) urn rrrrrrrrrrrm I�0 . „6k!J4 000 Table 13-1. Estimating Hail Size3 2 NOAA 3 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 3 1 P a Pea Marble Quarter l \ 101 1 �m 4 Diameter 1/2,,z Diameter ISCITIESS Virtually no damage. Slight Damage to plants. Virtually no structural damage. Some damage to plants. Some severe damage. 1" Dents to vehicles. Extensive damage to Diameter crops, plants, minor bodily damage. Severe damage. Ping Pong Ball 11/2" Paint damaged on cars; shingle roof Diameter damage; limbs broken; extensive damage to crops. Extensive bodily injury. Severe damage. Damage to windows, metal roofs pitted, Golf Ball 13/4" aircraft pitted, trees damaged, total crop damage. Tennis Ball 21/2" Baseball Extreme Damage Damage to roof tiles, Significant structural damage to buildings, risk of serious bodily injury. Extreme Damage Cars and airplanes severely damaged, 3" damage to forests, humans and animals seriously in danger. Softball 41/2" Occurrences Total Destruction Buildings destroyed, fatalities in humans and animals; cars and airplanes destroyed, forest severely damaged. VIESININ rr N, 7 ii i ,r r auNiy yi NAti ,i)(te )10110\ 111 ,111H1 III Hail producing storms can occur at any time of year and at any time of day, but they are typically more common in the spring and summer months during the late afternoon and Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 41Page evening hours. A smaller high frequency period can emerge in the fall during the brief transition between the warm and cold seasons. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers For Environmental Information Storm Event Database Nueces County has experienced 117 (recorded) hailstorm events over the course of the record period from 03/21/1956 to 04/22/2015 (59 years). Table 13- 2 includes a summary of hailstorm events from 1956 to 2015 and Table 13-3 includes a comprehensive list of all hailstorms on record within Nueces County. Table 13-2. Historical Hailstorm Occurrence Summary, 1950-2015 MAUS 118 1956-03-21 1957-03-03 1957-04-27 1959-05-10 1961-04-29 1966-03-28 1968-05-17 1969-11-26 1971-05-10 1971-05-11 1973-06-11 1975-05-01 1976-04-07 1977-09-08 1977-09-08 sssssswmzrzlzasssssxs inta tra tin Ea ita 28 15 42 5 6 19 Table 13-3. Historical Hai storm Events, 1956-2015 3 a` o � io iouri �1 ;r\I0 11 1 110010111111 11 � X1011 1 1� 1 1 I���` �1`1 1 �1 1�~�1���11\1� �11111111� � �� 1��1111.1 ���������1��,��y�� � X111 � �\�11� 11 \y����� 15:35:00 1.00 0.00 0.00 15:00:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 04:30:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:20:00 2.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:46:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:45:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:00:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 22:50:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 19:50:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 11:55:00 L75 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:30:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Corpus Christi Robstown Nueces Corpus Christi Nueces Nueces Nueces Nueces Nueces Robstown 09:00:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 22:20:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:40:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:40:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 5 1 P a d', m Table 13-3. Historical Hailstorm Events, 1956-2015 (cont.) 7�����1�!11V\\\\0 1980-05-22 00:15:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 1981-05-29 1985-05-08 1986-10-26 1989-05-17 1992-02-24 1993-05-02 1994-05-13 1994-05-13 1995-04-11 1995-04-11 1995-12-18 1996-04-05 1996-04-05 1996-05-11 1996-05-11 1996-08-14 1997-05-09 1998-03-07 1998-03-07 1998-04-18 2001-06-07 2001-06-07 2002-05-29 2002-12-12 2002-12-12 2003-03-26 2003-10-25 2004-02-24 2004-02-24 2004-02-24 2004-04-06 2004-05-13 2005-03-20 16:45:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:44:00 17:53:00 17:00:00 15:30:00 07:37:00 17:15:00 17:00:00 00:15:00 02:00:00 01:45:00 11:30:00 11:45:00 17:00:00 17:10:00 15:25:00 13:20:00 00:05:00 00:20:00 12:32:00 15:50:00 16:05:00 16:18:00 06:15:00 06:35:00 00:25:00 19:00:00 11:50:00 11:04:00 11:25:00 09:40:00 22:38:00 03:25:00 0.75 1.75 1.75 0.75 2.50 0.75 1.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.25 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.75 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.88 0.75 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.88 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $2,500,000 $50,000 $50,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 mem un i� o� Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Bishop Bishop Nueces Bishop Nueces Corpus Christi Port Aransas Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Robstown Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 6 1 IIS a d' e Table 13-3. Historical Hailstorm Events, 1956-2015 (cont.) 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-29 2005-05-29 2005-05-29 2005-08-31 2006-03-28 2006-03-28 2006-05-10 2006-05-10 2006-05-10 2006-05-10 2006-05-14 2006-08-30 2006-12-23 2007-03-13 2007-04-01 2008-02-16 2008-03-06 2008-03-06 2008-03-06 2008-03-10 2009-03-26 18:25:00 in (;� ,'y. l`1�11�i1ti11�1 \g1�11�i111 1"`1 t P! t P! viur a `v 1 A�11� a 0.88 0.00 0.00 18:19:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:20:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:25:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:28:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:35:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:37:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 17:55:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:27:00 1.25 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:10:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:30:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:25:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:30:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:40:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:52:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:45:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 16:13:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 17:30:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:27:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:45:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:30:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:35:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 17:22:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:35:00 2.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Robstown Driscoll Bishop Bishop Nueces Nueces Nueces 20:00:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:17:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:30:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 23:18:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 03:42:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:56:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:37:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:15:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Driscoll Robstown Nueces Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 14:50:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:44:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:10:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Bishop Nueces Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 7 1 IIS ,n d' e Table 13-3. Historical Hailstorm Events, 1956-2015 (cont.) 2009-05-23 2009-05-23 2009-05-27 2009-06-03 2010-04-17 2011-01-09 2012-03-29 2012-03-29 2012-03-29 2012-03-29 2012-04-16 2012-04-16 2012-04-20 2012-05-08 2012-05-08 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-15 2012-11-03 2012-11-03 2014-04-04 2014-04-04 2014-04-04 2015-04-17 2015-04-22 2015-04-22 2015-04-22 2015-04-22 18:00:00 in (;� ,'y. l`1�11�i1ti11�1 \g1�11�i111 1"`1 t P! t P! viur a `v 1 A�11� a 0.75 0.00 0.00 18:05:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:22:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 19:27:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:58:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 03:48:00 1.00 0 0 $500 0.00 15:23:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 16:02:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 16:10:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 16:12:00 1.75 0 0 $5,000 0.00 11:11:00 1.25 0 0 $5,000 0.00 11:27:00 1.50 0 0 $5,000 0.00 16:03:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 13:21:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:52:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 13:06:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:48:00 1.00 0 0 $5,000 0.00 13:57:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:12:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 21:27:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:29:00 1.25 0 0 $5,000 0.00 14:24:00 1.25 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:16:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:41:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 21:15:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 21:30:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 04:00:00 1.00 0 0 $500 0.00 04:05:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 03:28:00 1.75 0 0 $100 0.00 20:44:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:15:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Nueces Driscoll Corpus Christi Robstown Robstown Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 12:30:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:12:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:32:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Robstown Nueces Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 8 1 IIS ,n d' e Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of hailstorm events in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. A hailstorm may travel over several jurisdictions; however, the hailstorm event is solely recorded for the jurisdiction of the hailstorm origin. Table 13-4 provides a general overview of hailstorm severity, probability, impacts, and defining characteristics. Probability for future hailstorm events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 13-4. Hailstorm Severity Defined 1101 00` 10 11 \0\\\1 ,110111111111 .1\11\ 00111011111011 0\1\ 11\111)( � 1 36% of all hailstorms. $0 to Less than $100 in damage. No bodily injuries if exposed to the hail. 011 010 11 1 (1 01111111111111 11111111111501111111 1\111)( 11111111 ( �I 1 � 1 11111\\`����1��`��`��`��111�\\0\11�1�1\\\\11\0\\� 111\\\\1\\11 \\1\1�\�411�\ ��i6ii���111111\1111\1,1�11��,1�������� 45% of all hailstorms $500 to $50,000 in damages. Minor bodily injuries if exposed to the hail. 17% of all hailstorms $100,000 to $5,000,000 in damages. Fatalities possible if exposed to hail. Impact Hailstorm impacts are documented by the number of deaths, injuries, property damage, and crop damage. Table 13-5 provides a summary of impacts for Nueces County as a whole. Impacts to the county and participating jurisdictions is documented in the following sections. Table 13-5. Historical Hailstorm Impacts Summary, 1955-2015 A \ 118 0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 9 1 P a Vulnerability Hailstorms typically cross -jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in and around Nueces County are exposed to hail hazard and are at potential risk of impact. The damage caused by a hail is dependent upon the size of the "hail stones" and result in damage to vehicles, buildings, roofs, plants, trees, and especially crops. Vulnerability of humans and property is difficult to evaluate given that hailstorms form at different strengths and in random locations. Property damage is typically most significant for vehicles and structures of light construction. Three types of structures are more likely to suffer damage: manufactured homes and recreational vehicles. Agricultural crops are especially vulnerable to 1" or greater size hail and can lead to total crop failure. Vulnerability is defined for the county and participating jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 10 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Hailstorm Hazard SISSIZERSIS County Wide (Unincorporated ISSISSIMEMMUMMISSISSIM.. 11111.111111111111 Ira TM Una Int 27 6 2 8 0 1 7 3 ISSISS.112 ItaS\SSS 1111 1111111 2111111*111 1 HAILSTORM ESTI TED EVERY 27 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 2 18 YEARS ssssssttas.ss.s Amil\\\ y r qs �Amu j•% fisssS���S��S� ,�fisssS�fiSS���� ,�fimsS��S�S����� � �sS��S��S��� ��4tt�� 27 0 0 2,050,100 lsssslra lit* w.11 , 11 watualtlualus 15,274 $373,034,60 $487,429,634 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 345,880.3 0 $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 11 1 If" a City of Agua Dulce Hailstorm Hazard City Wide istassmmtimmtmassa ssss\swamzmnnssssssm\. tra mu Int In% Int int 1110111111101011111111111111 11011111 11 1 111 1) 1 111111\`111111\111\1�111�\l1\1\\11115\\111�1��\11�1�\l1\�\111\\ .11,11,",1", �,1�,1„1,11. ....111„�1\ \1 \ �t 0\� � 11 ��� � '\ igt 0 23.7% 12.7% 35.5% 4.2% 5.1% 16.1% 2.5% *While the City of Agua Dulce has no recorded hail events, because hailstorms take place in a spatially unpredictable manner, it is expected that Agua Dulce can be impacted by hail events in the same way that the planning area as a whole impacted by hail events. A probabilistic distribution of hail extent of based up on . . th . has been ��������������0000000000000000000 0 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 .06% annual chance, or one hailstorm every 1666.7 years ** **The city of Agua Dulce occupies approx. 0.03% of the planning area. Probability is based upon an area -weighted proportion of the probability of the planning area 11.\\ %MIA\ WttAtA\ a. 0 00 :o :o 1,71 SSA.Rntt Sirrill1111 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 2.45 $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 12 1 If” a City of Bishop Hailstorm Hazard ISSSSS • City Wide sssssrmtssss.. sssssswmztttnasasss\m\.. W. 11 !IM 111111 IV 11 IV 1111 11 6 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 ISSSISS1 MI ASSISS EA 1•1111 Et SUM 6 3/21/1956 — 4/22/2015 59 1 HAILSTORM EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 9.83 YEARS istssansass \\ Alum\Aim Tar',�fiss\',�fims�S��S�S����� .�s�S��S��S���',�fiszwtt 6 0 0 $50,000 $0 ls\stlmmamlssxmttasss c> 111111111 SIM, ,,,,SEIM 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 539.02 $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 13 1 If” a City of Corpus Christi Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSS\Z1MN\SSS\SS City Wide CM= 1111111111111111% MT tnssssmmmrtmtnsssssssm. tel% 111111 TM MAI Ira 1E1 11,111 65 13 10 24 5 4 9 0 121.k‘: 111 1311 ISIMW 65 3/21/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 YEARS ISISSISERSISS � 1/00//%� y /1 p6 9"%MAI 'AMA'""' rfisss�S���S��S�Act\�,�fiw% 65 0 $20,650 $0 sslss.t.ixm.)miryio,ltttik M\T ‘1‘\ 324,074 �> ttrms 11121S11111111i ltapra?;,\„i..\,,k\,,k\k\\\.\1\\\t.\.\t 324,074 $7,007,832,685 $10,238,656,508 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 24632.44 $6,044,014.65 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 14 1 If" a City of Driscoll Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSSI M\SSSSS City Wide .SIItt 111.1S11 SSSSSSSI 1 II 1 MISISS1 Vainal Itra 11M lin lara 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 ISSISS1122! EZtattla ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.NI13 3/21/1956 to 4/22/1956 5919.6 YEARS smassautisas. Amt\11% mully ��S�Act\\ w���c.F 0 0 Vr' =iTMia�� 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $500 464.67 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 15 1 If” a City of Petronila Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSSI MISSISS City Wide SIMS .1\IM 1 11 I 1 MSS .S\\ SSSSSSSII 1 1 ISISSIMM Vat TMSta 11111 Int VIM 23.7% 12.7% 35.5% 4.2% 5.1% 16.1% 2.5% *While the City of Petronila has no recorded hail events, because hailstorms take place in a spatially unpredictable manner, it is expected that Petronila can be impacted by hail events in the same way that the planning area as a whole has been impacted by hail events. A probabilistic distribution of hail extent of based up on historical occurrences in the planning area is presented above. SSSISS1211A\SSS un 111 »11 311 0 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 0.3% annual chance, or one hailstorm every 333.3 years ** **The city of Petronila occupies approx. 0.15% of the planning area. Probability is based upon an area -weighted proportion of the probability of the planning area experiencing a hail event. sstsssntsss AA", ,1.\\A \\%.\\AA," Avv% wit 0 0 0 so so ssssSsm\ qltinr %VD 11111% \__-„ Ivan malt lirmx 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 926.66 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 16 1 If" ,n City of Port Aransas Hailstorm Hazard Mna\SSS City Wide man lsasssmassss ,slassswmatmymssssssls. „„ , „)„11„„! VIZEMITSITHIERWRITH ,)„„„ 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ssssssmzcatsss lattaxlarmatu 1 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 56 1 HAILSTORM ESTIMATED EVERY 59 YEARS ssys—"""msp— a ma, 1 0 0 $0 $0 l".11S\pllr\\suTrrttlktMtsrritttwrnz Itrutittimmallvin sMxtrillirtsammilMal 3,955 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 17 1 If" a City of Robstown Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSSI MISSISS 16 City Wide ISSSSSMITIIZMIIZE ISSISS.SM. Slat Int Ira Int Int 4 2 7 0 1 2 0 ISSISS1122! ZEZIUMINSITZIW 1 HAILSTORM 16 3/21/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 YEARS sssss.stamss.s Amil\\\ upt tlAm fisssS���S��S� ,�fisssS�fiSS���� ,�fimsS��S�S����� �sS��S��S��� ,�fis,:'�,5w���� 16 11,576 0 0 $5,150 $0vrvantssAntla vrif%cammsati\-\ $151,390,423 $183,445,540 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 6580.37 $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 18 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hailstorm Hazard EASSSSS. Jurisdiction Wide nizzosalssamotatirkassal. „\„\„\\\\\„\x„\„\\„\„\\\..m,,,„n„.\,„\\x„„\„„\\„\„\\\„... ,)„„„\,)„1„,„, Ent itna Ira "Inn Ira Ira ,)„„„ 0 23.7% 12.7% 35.5% 4.2% 5.1% 16.1% 2.5% *While the City of Petronila has no recorded hail events, because hailstorms take place in a spatially unpredictable manner, it is expected that Petronila can be impacted by hail events in the same way that the planning area as a whole has been impacted by hail events. A probabilistic distribution of hail extent of based up on historical occurrences in the planning area is presented above. SSSSSSSE11MMSSSSS 7133ESSIIIMU 0 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 6% annual chance, or one hailstorm every 16.7 years ** **The Port of Corpus Christi Authority occupies approx. 3% of the planning area. Probability is based upon an area -weighted proportion of the probability of the planning area experiencing a hail event. sxsllsssl"""mst\P lY'111A 0 0 0 $ o $ o IZEMI ‘‘‘A ISSZI R TEM ISIST attlaSS% 11111•11111211111111 Sinn ISELS% N/A Industrial Area **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 19 1 If" ,n jl/%/ 'f ffJllll IIpV" r!1 1111 11 . 1111171'It111111111111111E11111I111111N111 1111 1M11 I��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111 rfI r11 )h°oo1N11111'�„111 �1,, Expansive Soils Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Expansive Soils Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Expansive Soils Hazard 13 City of Bishop Expansive Soils Hazard 15 City of Corpus Christi Expansive Soils Hazard 17 City of Driscoll Expansive Soils Hazard 22 City of Petronila Expansive Soils Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Expansive Soils Hazard 26 City of Robstown Expansive Soils Hazard 28 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Expansive Soils Hazard 30 Expansive Soils Hazard Overview Description Expansive soils contain minerals such as clay that are prone to large volume changes (swelling and shrinking). Soils with a high content of expansive minerals can shrink in drier seasons forming deep cracks. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging subsidence. Location Expansive soils with high clay content can expand to as much as 15 times its original volume. The soils in Nueces County, and most of the Texas Gulf Coast, typically contain less than 50 percent of clay soils that have a high swelling potential. Swelling potential in the Texas Gulf Coast is illustrated in Figure 14-1. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 1 1 If” ,n Figure 14-1. Texas Gulf Coast Swelling -Clay Map1 111.1(11,,,:.11,:'1„014.1„,/,((,,;,10,1011"!),,111:'.1'1.• #6 it 144g4( 11111419 Utin3fliol 1 ow i4 efelPairwwzike COHLORCOOE EXPIANATKYNI FOR OMILIP4G-CIAY AR iowt. 014,04,0w$,, dom.vtbre ihoth ywitkv tooNtorvi, VRI011 vbeletieby, 436 ullOort lottoelt. toom.hots c%0#,y h,,iti0000dt hvgl toronmoo 10%4 forip4f#9,10pcf, 4(1,,,my 44,49 fjo tlykwjerott, omfptill paoyelo4 . p4ps 44#0,t, ifiektroby "oum4 01#1Avoi 54) flr:144#41#4, #oolo hdoorej or41#11 opwAlone#4 Aigoplirie#4, IrlwAyontak4 Julioth.„ co#AnclorikA c'w iv,4hi#0,149;4 n#04, reititc000lo to 4344414 '6.0,0, Ip#26f Al 401 *Col /60 ANIONVII VIKW###/ 41 thown h keepatomen.:wg !Allem c#4; A USDA soil survey for Nueces County indicates that approximately 67% of Nueces County's land surface consists of clay soils as indicated in Table 14-1. 1 USDA soil survey for Nueces County Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 21Page Table 14-1. Nueces County Clay Soil Survey2 ISSSSMMarEtMrttn•EEtnnMi\SSSSM., 1211111 1111111111111MSS 111111111 11111VIRS Ba Banquete clay 11,896 1.7% €€;s;;� Bn Edroy clay 3,673 0.5% Cd Fc Lo Ma Oc Tc Tf VcA VcB Vd2 Vt Land Surface Extent Aransas clay 3,087 0.4% Sinton sandy clay loam 2,184 0.3% Aransas clay 2,809 0.4% Ijam clay loam 4,836 0.7% Calallen sandy clay loam 4,146 0.6% Aransas clay 4,842 0.7% Aransas clay 4,005 0.6% Victoria clay 306,474 43.8% Victoria clay 4,440 0.6% Monteola clay 3,072 0.4% Victoria clay 13,152 1.9% Total Clay Soils 368,615 53% Other Soils 180,745 26% Total Land Surface 549,360 Water Surface 150,851 22% Total Nueces County 700,211 100% 67% 33% Section 618.41 of the National Soil Survey Handbook (NSSH), by the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, indicates expansive soils can be measured as a percent of the volume change of an oven -dried soil sample when it changes from moist to dry conditions. This percentage is called the Linear Extensibility Percent (LEP). The LEP is calculated as indicated in Figure 14-2. 2 USDA Web Soil Survey Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 3 1 Ii" ,n Figure 14-2. Linear Extensibility Percent (LEP) Formula3 (moist length) - (dry length) COLE = dry length COLE = Coefficient Of Linear Extensibility LEP = COLE x 100 The higher the LEP percentage the greater the amount the soil will shrink and swell. LEP can be expressed in four Shrink -Swell classifications from Low to Very High as indicated in Table 14-2. The shrinking and swelling of soils with Moderate to Very High LEP can damage building, roads, buried infrastructure such as pipelines, and other structures. High to Very High LEP soils can even damage plant roots. Figure 14-3 graphically illustrates the distribution of soils for Nueces County by LEP Shrink -Swell classifications. Table 14-2. Shrink -Swell Classifications4 Low Moderate High Very High < 3.0% 3.0% - 5.9% 6.0% - 8.9% >_ 9.0% Based upon historical data and USGS soil data, all participating jurisdictions can expect a Very High Shrink -Swell Class in the future, corresponding to a Linear Extensibility over 9%. 3 USDA Web Soil Survey USDA Web Soil Survey Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 4 1 P a Figure 14-3. Soil Distribution by LEP Shrink -Swell Classification 100 1111111111 1,1,11111111111111,1,1,1111 ;;"'' "001 010 00111111000000 1111 ;0110000'1 011 .r ,11,11111,101,1,11011 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 '1111111116111111111,1E ✓CyrskwwJw' *, �Atot , etw ro, Occurrences I' ..00L0 -1 lMt.19 t4 n Adicr0 Ptolur So000 (w.s"ponstflit',yl. a.l"fi M S50RGAD Expansive soils are a condition that is native to the soil characteristics for specific geographic locations and "cannot be documented as a time -specific event, except when it leads to structural and infrastructure damage."5 'State of Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 5 1 P ,n d' e Damage due to expansive soils started to increase significantly in the 1960s when construction materials and foundations for residential homes started changing from pier and beam foundations with flexible sidings like wood to rigid monolithic concrete slab - on -grade foundations with brick and other masonry sidings. The rigid foundations with rigid sidings are less forgiving and are readily damaged by the differential swelling and shrinking cycles of expansive soils. Probability While damage due to expansive soils hazard is common in Nueces County, it is not well documented. Private claims documenting damages exclusively caused by expansive soils are typically not made available in the public domain. Table 14-3 lists the percentage and trend of foundation damage insurance claims made in Texas from 1960 to 2005 and includes forecasted claim percentages for the next five years from 2017 to 2022. The forecasted claim percentages are based on the claim trend from 1960 to 2005 as graphically illustrated in Figure 14-4. Table 14-3: Texas Foundation Damage Insurance Claims6 00 00 �o ��111 ��`��`��`��`�`��`���`�`��`����������������������������111 X11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'111 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2017 2022 *Forecasted 6 State of Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 3% 5% 9% 13% 14% 14% 21.5%* 23.0%* Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 6 1 P a Figure 14-4. Texas Foundation Damage Insurance Claims — Trend Chart all inn 2 :7.0% y:::::,0.0027x-::y.2307 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Another indicator of historic impacts and potential future impacts is the accelerated trend of foundation repair companies opening offices in Nueces County. As indicated in Table 14-4 and Figure 14-5, the quantity of building foundation repair companies with offices in Nueces County has increased nearly three -fold in the 15 years, from 8 in the year 2000 to 22 in 2015. The average quantity opening per year nearly doubling to 1.3 per year between 2010 to 2015, compared to the previous period of 0.7 per year between 2001 to 2009. Table 14-4. Rate of Foundation Repair Companies Opening in Nueces County 1 X1111`1 �1, `�"���� 111 1 �`������ 1VtitAt 1978 - 2000 2001 - 2009 2010 - 2015 1978 - 2015 11,11A\m" 23 9 6 38 8 22 111 7111PY1�m�1i��\0\�����11 Art 11\11\11\ 011�\11111111\\ilt ilii l�\ \\11\1\\1\\111\\1 0.3 0.7 1.3 0.6 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 7 1 P a Figure 14-5. Trend of Foundation Repair Companies Opening in Nueces County 19)0 'Alt) 401 Ornommulom.m, em...49moboomamouige' Offfirmocig.dpie...44' m06,04600.1,106dbuommAmomm9401.0'Mam"'41"°# 9 ,dOlf 4,(Sryt . :041, 1990 6, 2. 201 15, 2015, 22 2022 31 NIMed 001 ,M104015 Chten. a r? 14 11 'IS 11 Quantity of Foundation Riipair Companie3, with Officel trt Nuiticat County Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 8 1 P g Table 14-5. Foundation Repair Companies Opening Offices in Nueces County 4A\ 1 Du -West Services** 2 Dawson Foundation Repair Inc. 1984 33 3 CC Foundation Repar Co. 1986 31 4 BKB Structural Repairs 1989 28 5 Coastal Bend Foundation Repair 1989 28 6 Gulf Coast Foundation Repair** 1990 27 7 On the Level Foundation Repair 1996 21 8 Texas Superior Construction & 1996 21 Foundation Repair 9 Bridge Foundation Repair 2001 16 10 Leveling and Repair 2001 16 11 Streem Co. Foundation Repair 2001 16 12 Area Foundation Repair 2004 13 13 Eagle Foundation Repair 2004 13 14 Uretek ICR South Texas 2005 12 15 KJ Foundation Repair 2010 7 16 Level One Foundation Repair 2011 6 17 Crown Foundation Repair** 2012 5 18 Mammoth Foundation Repair 2012 5 19 Paramount Foundation Repair 2012 5 20 Sure Lift Foundation Repair** 2013 4 21 Wombat Excavations 2013 4 22 USA Foundation Repair 2015 *Based on the Better Business Bureau records. **Company has a local office/address but is based outside of Nueces County. ***Percentage is rounded. ****years in business is assumed based on year the BBB opened a profile on the company. vu � 1 �o11i11��o0�0��� � 1�0�� X01 ��» till � � U V111\)\1\1��111@ �' 1�1111P1)�11* 11111 1 11� 1�ao�1�11��1� 1978 39 2**** ti11\ 111111111111 \111 u 1 �11111� t 11 '�y�,����111111111111��111�����1�11�1``!111��11 >= 20 Years 11 - 19 Years <= 10 Years 6 ti N m With approximately 67% of Nueces County consisting of expansive clay soils, and the majority of Nueces County having High to Very High expansive soils as graphically illustrated in Figure 14-5, and the assumption that insurance claims for foundation damage in Nueces County follows the State trend, and that the growth of foundation repair companies in Nueces County will continue, it appears highly probable that all of Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 9 1 If" ,n the Jurisdictions in Nueces County (with the possible exceptions being Port Aransas, and the Flour Bluff and Padre Island communities of Corpus Christi) will experience property damage from expansive soils, which will further increase with anticipated population growth and development. Impact Swelling and shrinkage typically varies depending on the amounts of moisture content and clay content. Uneven shrink/swell cycles is what causes damage to building foundations, walls, roadway pavement, sidewalks, underground piping and other structures. Lightweight types of foundations like concrete pavement for roads and concrete slab on grade foundations are particularly susceptible damage from the shrink/swell cycle. Cracked foundations, floors, and basement walls are typical types of damage done by swelling soils. Private claims documenting damages exclusively caused by expansive soils is not well documented in the public domain. However, as indicated by the increasing trend of insurance claims and accelerated growth of foundation repair companies in Nueces County, varying degrees of future damage to building foundations should be anticipated as well as impacts to roads and buried infrastructure. The expansive soils hazard is not anticipated to impact the health and safety of the Nueces County residents. Impact can be measured in terms of property damage, when such data is made available. Vulnerability Expansive soils primarily represent a threat to buildings and subterranean infrastructure. Crops and people are not typically directly threatened by expansive soils. Vulnerabilities to expansive soils are determined by examining what critical assets and properties are in different areas of soil expansibility. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 10 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Expansive Soils Hazard sssssls\ 1.1\MV Ongoing MIST MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) oa »oloa1i11iii li�luuulii11191�� lo���ol»�� 111III1�a9�991 � \ 1 1 � 1. Q. I ��1��1�10��1���1�1��������������\������������������������������������������������������������������„11„1111�,111�11,�`�,11�1111„�,11��1111,11�,�11,11� 1,11,1�1��1,1�� �1, �11�1�1�1�0�1����`��������������\������������������������������������������������������������������ �,»�,,,,1» ��� ��� �II��,��I, ,11,111„�1� »»,» „` 11111111„1„1»�,111�1,1111 ��II� X11111111„ �„ „»I,»I�l �1111�1„��„»,»„1,,1,1,,,»,1,1„ 1,»„"�,,,,»,�„»»„»�,,,, „ 1141, 1„ „1,1..111. , „1. 1> > 1,„ �„» „ , 1 1 u I i 1 1 1 ��1�1�1��1�01�\������������\����������������`1111111,11111,,1,111�11,11111�1111�,1,1111,1111,1 11 �11�1,1111,1111 X11,1,,11,111111,11,111„11,11,111,,11�1„1111,1,11111,I11111,11,11,11111111�111�1111,,111�11111„,11� 1��111X1111�1�1����1�������������\����������������� 1,1,,,11„�»„»»1,11,,,,,,,,»,111»,111111111111111,,,,1,»»,»,,,,1,»»»,,,,�,1,�11,,,,,,,»I�1� �, »1111 »»II»,1„1» 1 �1, � 1 1 �, a1 ��1����01�����1���1�������������111���,11,11;�1111,1�1��1111,11�11,111�11���111��11«�1,�11�1„�111��\0��1����1��1�������������������\ ��1����01�����1���1�������������„111X11„1111�11��111�,1�11X1111�1�11,111�11,�11�1,1111,�111�1„�11,�����\0�\��1����\��������������� \ � 1 1� »lay 1�� 1 ll�oll»I ao I�alil�ll »�»�»I»a 1» o� 1��I III I lolo�» ao I�alil�ll »�»�»I»a 11 111 11� 11 1 111 11� 11 I u 1 u 1 � l l 1 l l nl �\ 1` m” 1 1` 1 1 ,x, ax i V 16� 1i11 V�u, � I V IY� 1i11 V�u, 1 X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��`��`�`�1111�81111��111�11�1111��11110�1��`�`�1��1�1�1��`��`� X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��11�\11`n�11�110�0�`111�1�110�0�»��1�1�1�1��1�1�� X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��`��`�`�11nIV111�1\\X1111101�11�1�1�1110�1�\�`��1��`��\�`�� X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��11�\11`n�11�110�0�`111�1�110�0�»��1�1�1�1��1�1��� ��� 1 tv=e 111 (�1111� 11111 11 r li i li n, nay lu aila ou�l0�ai1ao 1� »� »» sol»II of aila ou�l0�ai ao 1� 1n� lui lol m»II of aila ou�l0�ai1 ao 1� »� »» sol m»II of aila ou�l0�ai , ao 1�`� + � ��11111 1.1 1191 \1111 » \1\11 1.1 \1111 \ 111111111 1.1 1191 \1111 » \1\11111 1.1 \1111914 V�.....�� 14.. �� � � ,,. .914 �., � �� � 914.. ���11118111�111111I1111�4�11��II11����11�V1111`I���1��� 611111111���1@11111111111111����1 11�1�111��1111111111�4�11111��11�`�11���11���1611111111���1@11111111111111��11� 611111111��� 11�111IIhX111@1111111111111111�11111111�11���11111u1111��11111�111111111111��1� 611111111���1@11111111111111��11� 11�1�111��11111111101�1111�4�11111��11�`�11���11���� 611111111���1@11111111111111��11 LOW $32,623,800 7% 599 7% $24,334,700 6% 30,088 8% MODERATE $71,832,400 HIGH $121,204,400 93% VERY HIGH $261,769,000 TOTAL $487,429,600 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 1,028 2,848 3,924 8,399 93% $43,762,100 $104,723,300 $233,561,500 $406,381,600 xsssssstml\FFlrtzWssfiSSfiS��S�S��S��»»»»»»»»»»»>" ‘.1\AAA1M\ \\CC LOW HIGH VERY HIGH 18,014 94% 190,274 92% 118,361 356,738 DAM Belvy Lake Dam Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam FIRE STATION Nueces County Emergency Services District 1 DAM Chapman Ranch Lake Dam London ISD London HS Banquete ISD Banquete HS SCHOOL London ISD London EL Banquete ISD Banquete EL Banquete ISD Banquete JH Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 11 1 P a L Figure 14-6. Soil Expansibility for Unincorporated Nueces County oliiiiii ))11111111111111111111' 11111111111111111111 z 000, m wA, 1i11ll 111111111111111111 )011 01 1110101101 11.1111111111))111111111, ff'''', „II ii 11111111 o„niii lit it 1111111111111 1111111111111111111111 1 II 10111111111111111111111»»„, 011,-:.*"iiia°.11 11111111h1j uu 11C0I110111 1.11r,,mn„ma. HI)) 1111 t'he a°gra C.owrty t„, hatioiductg ria"' Hazard %a' ,,ton Ac Pr ApeorripbA'oty uOA 55,IhJR1(30 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 12 1 P ,n d', City of Agua Dulce Expansive Soils Hazard sssslssm. \sss SIM\ Ongoing MIST MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) 01 »lo nolo ,»I I» 1u�iai7171i� to»�Ilo», a�»i»���o���,i I � 1 �,�»,1»» »� �» �»»,��„ „1„1,,,�» »»,» „1» 1»»,1„»,11,11111,1,1,»w,»I„1,,,,1, »,» ,,,»,11» „»,,,,,111»I�III��11„»,»», ,�„»�»,� ,1,,,, »»„1,�,»»»�,1„�,»»»», „11 ».1 ,1, , »,11 1111,. ,,, , ,,,, a 1,1 » „1,,, „ , � n, v 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\�,,,,,,,,,�,�,,,,�,�Nn,,,,,1,,,�„�,,,��11„»,�»„�,,,�,��,,,�„�„���1,��»,,,,,�,�„N�,,,�„h����,,,,�,��,h��,��,��„���11�,,,,�,�,�,X11,;�,,,,����,���„�,»�,,,,�,���,,,,�,�i��,tile,,,,,�„�,,,,�,�„��„���11�„N��11„�,,,,�,�,���I�,�,,,,�,���n��„il��„���\1�1�1�1����1�1��������������������������������������� 111„�»I,»»»»„»,,,,1�»I»,1„�»,»,,,1,,,�,� 11,» »,» 1» „1,1„1»„»»,,,, ,,,,1,,,,�,� ,1, ,a, ».1 a 11,»,,,,11,1» ,1,1� 1 �1 l \ U 01001 \0110\1\ 11101101110011\11 b (111` � \�ll� � u, unu ,� � .171 � � 171. � ����0\�\��������\�������������������\�„��,�„�,,,�,,,�,,,�,�,,,�,,,,�,,,,�„N��,��„���1,�,ill,,�����\��\�����\���������������������\� ����0\�\��������\�������������������\�,,,�,X17,�,,,,�,�,��1�„�„�„N�,,,�„�,,,�„�„�`I,��»�,,,,�,�„�»,�„�\�\�\�����\���`�������`��������������� � to »I»1,11„ ,001a1 ` ,01 loo »011oo»I»o »7 ,1110 0» ,ii ai iu�a ,01 loo »011oo»I»o 1, 01111 1 11 01111 1 � 1 1 1 1 � » u » 1 \ \ t \ \ 1 1 1 � 1 � 1 1 11 l 111 sumnal i �� V� � 171 IIV��u, 1 IY� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�1i�w711���»�o�7oui»11o��0��`�1�1���������������� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�����1»II����o�oU`I�io��i�7o����`�`�`��1������� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�`ar o1171�0�11�oi���l�iiiii�,11�1�1�1�1�`��`�`����� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�����1»II����o�oU`I�io��i�7o����`�`�`��1������� ttin��11�`1�1`11a1»1 »11 111111,»11» 111111 116w,1111111,u o 711 171 111111,»11» 111111 116w,111111 � 111 a171 1111 111111,»11» 111111 116w,1111111,u o 711 171 111111,»11» 111111 116w,111111 � 111 u�n„,,,1 11111,11 l 1 1117»11111111,11 l11111 `� � 11111,11 l 1 1117 »111 11111,11 l1 1111 1a„, x, 171 �lW Emma mai �� MEM �Il�l�l�ol�o���ll�\�Ill�lo��l���'�1��1�1����11`�111�\�1���``II�� n�����7�����li�����1���7�����»�1���,��1�1��N�i��I���N�11i��1�11�` n��`�`�`, Im�\�`�`�1��������Ii�1��N���i17����»�11�„�����hs�,��l���hl�1 n��`�`��,�1�1�� n��`1�10�11�,���lim��l�a»���,��1�m�,��1���11h1���1����11��111\��1�1�� n��`�`�`, Im�\�`�`�1��������Ii�1��N���i17����»�11�„�����hs�,��l���hl�1 n��`�`��,11 LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $0 $0 $1,158,500 $19,552,700 $20,711,200 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 0% 0 100% 5 58 63 0 0% $0 0% 0 0% $0 0 100% $0 100% 0 100% $17,541,400 895 $17,541,400 895 11111111 " "" " " Iss\s" 111, "J"\\\rzPtttlnmBmnzamssssss: IA VERY HIGH SCHOOL Agua Dulce ISD Agua Dulce HS Agua Dulce ISD Agua Dulce Elementary School Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 13 1 P a L lihi',V'i uv � i"d1Y, li' dsilttVuu4 11 apNYuumP ,IP'; Figure 14-7. Soil Expansibility for Agua Dulce I�1111S11�i'�'K"uj1111111d11ioiii00ll'll!'II "„;„ IIIIIIIp111iu�ll"ill'���II .�"1I1'I��I II���1111X11IIII1 d°11111�1I1j��wI1Nm1„u11d11 1 AWWWW�I111111111111111 pm..,11Imi11�I�11muuu 1I1I Ii1,� lili1"1"IDII�4II�lI 1�II1II1�!N!VIIpN II',,IluI� 11 11 IID PN Iu� '1401:111,1""1,0!,1,111i11":111";11:1",11:0,;11 I�wIIu 0 11t" ' 11101 1111111 111 011 1.' ; Ij pp 111'11; 11111111 IIII1111000,. 011ll�p I'�liii� 1111 iiljplil llgf l�nI �' t 0000 e1111II' 0 00000 1!I011 1O00 III@ul 1111111111 111111110i1110 I loolhoIII 1111111 loolu! 11110 1, 11 11111 11111111111111111111 1 u 1000m0000001o1om0 11111111101011101011 11111111 1111001111111110011001011 1u „1�u0V1^Involoo m� l p1 m�111!II 111 11111111 i%�Ir�1I"I,�11'�111`dI�q1Im1'n,o„d1,111'' ,IIIMII I'111101111111n 11 I1i1 IIIII u uuu1111111111111uuuuluuuuuuuuu11111111101111plppp1�lMIliQllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111011 a "'"1101 li IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111,000, plllll��(III IIII q�n 1�,'i0111110111111 111111111111100 1�'y'llllpl'IuIlu,llillllll lll10 1 Y1111111I�N, IIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111 llIll 1111111111 u II III ill° ;1d�illul.0000101010101011 ii' I 1 ��I�InIYI�IIYIIYIIum11Imlllillllllnilllllnlllllmulmllnlllllllllm1111uI1�IImIImmIInI1lI1IlIIIImIImIIIIiIIIIIIil111 1 m III 11' 11 1 1111111110111111111(1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111°1 I���0 I I I IIII .1111111.i1111111.1111.1111.11111,111,111„111„111, lll 111 1" "111111 1 11111 11'11101111111111111111111111111111111 � I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 1 1 I I I I I II IIII 11111111 1 �II� 11 �r11IIIIIIII 111111111 111110000000000000000000000000000000000 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 �P"x �� 111110:1111,111111111111111111111,111111111111r111111 �1 n111111 111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ,,,II, ��u11111P1I'IYR LoK,INA0 h+»N'7tlr� ��m^wrl�lr•�^�,+�„a 4 RmoroAMfil,i 1114'gI(„ Gk,yo14uru'AIr,4YdII1710 nb@ 1'Ito:r df, IIR'1Ytl+i4, rtrlolo,„ Iw,o; Cell r IF '1'I 11 Sl m4 ;$M 6,114(,(„) Itlf (IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII@(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII V' I 111 11 fl d II 11110 11 II illNuun11111 u1111111u1111111111111111111111111111111111111u1111111111111111111111 u1111111uu1111111111111111111u 11111111111111111111111 1 11 11 111 u 11 1111 1111111111111 1011 130- u,,I, 06'„'IIS Immwlru ”, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 14 1 If'° ,u 00»I' 0 City of Bishop Expansive Soils Hazard SSW \ Ongoing SISIV MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) �� ,�01 »��,�, »,� »i,u�»iai717 ,i� 100�1100� ,Aa,711o,1a,0 I \ 1 1 \ \ U 1 �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\��,,,„»„�,»'�„��,»�,»,,,,�,»1111»�„X11»„»,�,,,�,I��„���,,,����0�0�1���\�0�1�������������������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\��� 1 �,,, » „ „ , ,11,11 7.,, L. 1„ � , , »„ ,�,,,, „ , 11 » » \ I s 11 \ I 1 1 V u 0 �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\�»,,»,»»I»��,�`�»,�„�„»�»,III,,�„»1,�,»,„�„�,»,�»��n,,���,»,»»�»��11,�,1�1�»,�„�,»111»�,�i�,��i�»J»„�,»�„�,1„�„��„N�„�,�»1»,�„�„I,»,�,�ii�,»i��,�„�„»�»,�„„�»11�1�»�11�1»,,,»»�„N��,»,�,��,�I�,��»��» �111111�1�1�1�1��1�1����`���������������������������������������� 1 »11 V 1 11 � 1 l \ 0111101111111111111111 111!111 II 1111111�� 1 \ 111111 1 ( 1 � �� � � „ ��u, u7 ,� � 171.E � ..171 �, 0I�� ����0\�\�����������������������������„N»�,»,�,�,,,,,»���`„»,�„�»,�„�„��1,11�„N�,�»,711„�������������������������������������� ����0\�\�����������������������������,,,,,�1,,,»,�,�»SII»,�„�„���1,��»�„»,��11,��,»,�,����,�1�»����������������������������������� 011�0�111�� 11 »» u� vu ,a v ,1,,,x111 ,,, »01,»0 »011,00a o ,1,1u ,a v ,1,,,x111 , 01 11oo»a »011,00a 111 1,1 ` , ,1111 1,1 ,1,11 � 0.1.1 0.1.1 1 u \ 1 1 1 1 1 11 0 11 1 1 nl � � ^ 11 1 ^ o \ ��������������������,»,�,17�»,��,»,�„�»,�,,,'�1�������������������� ���������������,,,�7w,,�7„�,,;�„N��,»,�,�„»,�������������������������������„�„m�1�„�,,��,7„�7„�,�,,,������������������`� ����������������,�,17�17,�,»�»111,�,,,�„�,»,»�����������������. \ �1 , » ,7� „„ 1x1,,,», », ,,,,117�w,7„11 ,,, „ ,» »» »» �„11 », ,,,,117�w,7„11 ,,, „ » 11„ „» �,,,, », ,,,,117�w,7„111 ,,,, „ ,1� ,17 ,,,,� »,», », ,,,,117�w,7„11 � ,111,,,1 l l 1117 »111 \ »11111,1 l l »�\» »11,\111» l l 1117 `� 111 1 111,1„1 l l 1 , 1 1 1 0 4 U 1 \� U 1 1 ,1 l �0 o�� �� �� � � ��� �� a �� 1 1 0 �\���1��\I�����1� ��„�11�,�i�l,�,�„�1�,»,�,»�»„»,��,hl�»����,tis1���1��1 ����0\,�;��1111111��� ��\»711,��1,�,�„a7,,,�„»�,,,»,�,�„��1,1��„N�11�1� ����\»�»,�,i�1�„�„�7„�7„�1„»�»I»il�„���,»���`�'��1���0� LOW $0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 7 1% $0 0 $0 0 HIGH $1,109,000 100 22 100 $1,705,600 100 338 VERY HIGH $98,264,100 % / 361 $114,184,300 %784 TOTAL $99373,10 383 $115,889,900 1,129 0 MODERATE *Rounded to nearest $100.00 99% �� » 7 111 0\ 011\ 01111111111 III 11111111171 1111 \1111111\O1 »\\1111111»11111 11111110111111 »»111111111 1 1.11 1 V � 1 1 VII � � II 1717 ������0������������1»,11�»,1�11���»,„11»�»,"1,�,�1`�7,11»,1111»�1��17«�11,�;,,,»�1,1»7„�»���»I��»i���1»��1������0�0�01��1���`��������������������������������������������������������������������� �\ »»\ »\\, »,»I»�I11111�111„1,1»� 11,1»VIII IIS„1111,11»»I»,1,,,,111111» 11»„ X1,11»,»»I �11111�1,11111,,,,11,,,,,» \\1\111\11 1 11111. 111. 1 111 I 1 ( 1 ) 1 1 U 1UU 1 1 �� � 11 � I) ,� �1 �1 1 �1 9 � u , ��`�"�`�1`1�7»�7�1�I��7�1,11�7�7��171�7�1u�»11�71�1�7�,11�17��1111�7�7�`��1��6i1�"�11111�1»I �1m1�171�7'��7"�1�11�171���`�711���`�1,��1��1�71�7"�7���������������`�`������������������������������������ 11 1St" 0�u I 7�u�» VERY HIGH SCHOOL Bishop CISD Bishop Pri Bishop CISD Bishop EL Bishop CISD Bishop HS Bishop CISD Lillion E Luehrs JH Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 15 1 P a L Ili IDR iVmp Figure 14-8. Soil Expansibility for City of Bishop VI�IIIDAMVV ?,11 111111111 1111 01 100 11,II11I111111H11 1 1 1�111l IV H11 1I11I11II11�111 ''pX��1111II�II 1I aV1 puuI 1!l� 1 VIII IiM1i111.11,111 �1 1111 I III I 11vIA111�1'1'1'111'111 lV'1M1I11,,11.,1.„'111111.11111111111111111111111111m dVI1I1111� pluu19NNW1N1111 1111111villuIl..1, 111111 1.0101 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Ili IIIIII 1N11I iMumI111IIIIINllll 11 IIII 1j1II111IVIN11l1qIw�uwwl�wu�moo� V9 9 °V A 11111111011110 X11 1 o1 IMI 1 111 1 IHI,iiI �II WYu I orv! o 1.'0',;; 0,',,;;',.', !A! 1 IMI1I1111 1 1a lululu III1 110101h i,l;l111111 uII t 10M0010J0 01111111111111111111111100000010 Mmm"M I�l�u I�w!111aY!Vu1u1u1uuum umull nn 11 1�I11111mIIIII1p 111N11111111111111�11v111'1N1100VII III�NNYl pumi Idu AMM IIIl 11111111 u'i'I 1 M 1oNomuuiuu1 111 ��N11IIIHHHHHHHHHHHH1111111 101111111 IIIIIIIIII11111 11111111111111111111111110111000000vvl AV MVIVI��.MIY nlm11nw am n ,111111 mm 10111111111111II V00 HH 111' II 1111111 IIII( uuuuuuu�� (1111 HNxx NNYIXx!II qw� VIII V MMMT l'M' N°,11 yl 1 Ilel'0111111 VIII 11IMi1 llllllll1111��111 �1��1�11IIIIIl1 '111 11111111111111111111111111111111 fi Y 11111u Illus I I III 1 > ul��, IIII , II I111u1I,I,II�IUIVV °ii IIIIIIIu9Vil II1II1ii ii1111111111 III, b,,l 'i'hnl� III, I'I u1111111111111111,111111111111111 111111111 „vvvvvv!w IIIIIIIIIIIII,, 1 il,l" IIIIII-vvvHv1 �PY11 Y�M11N1 uIIIII �IVI tin 11 I11a�svvvv,0 ,la 11111111,1111' ,N «IIIIIs�sss:1111.!!N11111�1tititil1!wII'I 1111111111111111111111111111 !!!! 01ilIN'''lh CV Np'IUMI "I IIi0 ulll ul�1111 Xw I"11 I VH111111111111111111111 Vv'lMu gyp�',I���� 1,ll lll�,n I,I � MoIvvvoloolovoovI 00i01 11 �I�I 111 v ,Ivilvvvvvvv1,11,11vvI ouuluul JJ 11 ii111 VV i'll�l'f,ll� VIIIIIII Iu,l '11 'll l' ���NNUI 1vmmJ 1111 �II1llIIpIn101110v itlW011011111111P, 111111111111 wl „1,1,11,vvv,vvvvv,11111111111111111111,1,muN Ilal !a o11,.,,;aW Viva aw 011,0103 M pae or A:tVon V1114001 •'.01;'#011° P,' w007.41#tllW07'►' n, sno, sr; UURRGO wµ $4, t.$0,0,40044,001V01011, 101M000 , Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 16 111111, ,u , #„„ City of Corpus Christi Expansive Soils Hazard ssassx.. Vlass SSSIY AIM Ongoing SSSSV Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) \\ \�0\»»1�1 »I� »ilul»i6016161 \oo�\\oo� 11a611�6,1a» 1 � 1 1 �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����,11,1111,�111'�1,��111�1111,11111��1111�11�1111,11111,1�11��,1���1,1����0�0�1���\�0�1�������������������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\�� \\\ „\\\ \11111» I» �I»»,»1,111„\\\,�,� »»,» \6\» \\\I,\\\I»111,1\1111\,1,»w1»1,1111» I»II I» 1111,11» \11,1»»I �111,�111�,\\\,»�»1»»I 1�,\„�»1� ,\\\\\ \11,,,\,�„1\»,�\\\,�\I,»,1\» \ \,1.6.1 „ \ , \\,\\ 1111,..111. 1,„ � , , » \111\\ „ , 1 11 v \ \ 1 I 1 V 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\����\�11111111,»�Il���lhl�lll�ll�ll,�lll��lll�ll�»``1 �1111,11�11�111;�11���11���1111,»X111111'»I�Ill�ll�lll��lll�l���l�llllll�lllll�„11�1���11N��1�,1»Illl�ll�lllllll�l�i�llli��l�ll�ll,�lll�,l�ll�lll��ll�ll�lll��»�I,11»�IIN�I�Illl�l��lhl�l��ll���ll���\�1�1������������������������������������������������������������ \\\�\\\»,\�\\,\»ll»,» «II,»111,»�,111�11111,�„ »»\ »I�\ \» \,\,\I„\\\,»»,11»111 „111111,,, \1 11 1 111 1 1 \ 1111111111\11 1 1111 1 \ 11 \ i \\1 \� \ \�\\� �\��\\\�� 111 1111111 II (111\II�\� 1 � 1 \\ 1 1 ( 1 \ n � \ \ � Q l l n�l� l n ti 1 1 1 pp�� a ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\�����I��I,�,1111��1,;,11�»�lll�llll�l�llll�l��lh�1111���1tis�11111»111�1������������1�1��11�1�1�`��������������\��� ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\��1111�1��1111�,11�11��111�����1��1�11�11;11111�1��11N»IRIIII�III�II�II�I,II�;������������������������������������� 11111) \1��\1 0i 0 \�u 101» »i »11a o1 aoo��\\ \\o��\ooa Iw Iw 1a1 61 I \000�o v o1 1\e\ \»� o�ll»o\o 1\ ���\ 11 1\\\\ 1 1\ \\1111 \ 1 » u u \ 1 1 1 1 1\ 1 \ nl � � 1 1 1 �� „ V 1 �� n„ p 1 �� n„ 1 0 1� 1� l� 1� u �����\�\�����������������1�1�»1�11?�Il�lll�l�llll���������������ti�������� �����\�\�������11�,1»�Illl�ll�ll��ll�lll�ll�llll»����������������� �����\�\���������������1�1�»�,11�11�1,11�,1111���0\�������0�01���0�`�`�� �����\�\�������11�,1»1111�11�111��111�111�11��1111����������`������� t �1 t 4 � 4 V�1 \111 \\\1 \\\\\ 111 11116 1161ll111111 \111 11 1111 1111 1141 111,11 111 11116 1161ll11111 ' 11 11 1111 1\11 1111 110.1 111 11116 1161ll111111 \111 11 1\11 1» 1111 111,11 111 11116 1161ll11111 ' 111 11 � 11\1111 t 1 111N 111 1 1111111 l 1 111 l 1111111 l 1 111N 111 .1111111 l 1 11 1 � \ X11 u, ,, X11 6 ��ll � � IIII 1 � � IIII 6 V 1 6 V� 1 6 V� 6� V� ��10\1\11�,1»II1i1111�1��»�I,11»�1111�,1�11���1��11�1���������� ��1��,»1�1��11� X11»,I��li�l�ll�ll��\III,1»�1,1111�,�11��1,1��IIN�11� ��1�0\,1,�;��1\1\01 ��1�0\11�,1»��,IIli1111�11��»�I,11»�1111�,1�11���1��11�1��������� ��1��,»1�1�1� �11�„�I�i�ll�l�,l�l�llll�,»�»,I,II��Ih1�ll����ltis111 ��1�0\,�;��1111111�1 LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $3,924,789,300 $1,287,620,300 $529,867,600 $4,496,379,300 $10,238,656,500 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 38% 8,035 44% 2,374 62% 1,064 56% 6,990 18,463 $2,765,339,300 $727,346,000 $640,573,600 $3,014,746,400 $7,148,005,300 39% 61% 0 11l0 0\ 011\ \1111 6111611611116 111 \1111111111 1\1111�1111�11111 1 11111 11111 1111»1111111 1111111 1\ l 1 .1111111 5 \ 11 � 1 \l,\\�\,1»1» 1»�,1�1� 1111111„�Il„� �,1,,,�1„»,,,»I»\II»ll �I1111»1�11�1,11,111�,,,�,\�,1��,1»» \\,1 1, 1, , »�„\ ,11 , 61� 1 \ 1 1 1 n �1 11X0111�010�11S�`���\1»I,\»,1��,,\I1,\ 1,»»\�I»I,\I»,,»I,\1,»I,\,\1,1�»�1,11,,,1,\»1,1�,\»11„»I,\,�I,\���,\I�»I,\I,»I,\11111111111111��11`����������� TArrir "IV • AV%1 .0100101\001 Hal 100111110101110��\ LOW DAM EOC FIRE STATION 31,630 30% 5,240 40,617 70% 27,514 105,000 Barney M Davis Cooling Reservior Dam Nueces County Emergency Operations Center Nueces County Emergency Services District 2 Fire Station 3 Fire Station 1 Fire Station 8 Fire Station 7 Fire Station 13 Fire Station 15 Fire Station 16 Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi HOSPITAL Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi ShorELine Driscoll Children S Hospital Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 17 1 P a MODERATE SCHOOL FIRE STATION HOSPITAL Dubuis Hospital Of Corpus Christi The Corpus Christi Medical Center - Doctors Regional Ray HS Seashore Charter Schools Seashore Middle Acad Roy Miller HS And Metro School Of Design Hamlin Middle Seashore Charter Schools Seashore Learning Center Flour Bluff ISD Early Childhood Center Oak Park Special Emphasis School Evans Ses Houston EL Mary HeLen Berlanga EL Crockett EL Allen EL Shaw Ses Collegiate HS Driscoll Middle Hicks EL Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff Int Zavala EL Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff Pri Corpus Christi Montessori School Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff JH Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff EL Martin Middle Dr M L Garza -Gonzalez Charter School Gcclr Institute Of Technology Menger EL Fannin EL Wilson EL Coles HS And Educational Center Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff HS Windsor Park G/T Travis EL Calk EL Harold T Branch Academy For Career & Techn King HS Baker Middle Fire Station 4 Fire Station 14 Bayview Behavioral Hospital, A Campus Of Corpus Christi Medical Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 18 1 P a MODERATE SCHOOL HIGH VERY HIGH DAM HOSPITAL SCHOOL DAM FIRE STATION HOSPITAL WATER PLANT SCHOOL South Texas Surgical Hospital Carroll HS Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Pri Browne Middle Moore EL Veterans Memorial HS Por Vida Academy Cesar E Chavez Academy Schanen Estates EL Adkins Middle Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi South Post Acute Medical Specialty Hospital Of Corpus Christi The Corpus Christi Medical Center - Bay Area The Corpus Christi Medical Center - The Heart Hospital Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Academic Career Center Smith EL Barnes EL Calallen Reservoir Dam Annaville Fire Department Fire Station 6 Fire Station 9 Fire Station 10 Fire Station 11 Fire Station 2 Fire Station 12 Corpus Christi Rehabilitation Hospital The Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest O. N. Stevens Water Filtration Plant Trinity Charter School Bokenkamp South Park Middle Calallen ISD Calallen Wood River EL Moody HS Jones EL Grant Middle MirELes EL Faye Webb EL Por Vida Academy Corpus Christi College Prep HS Sanders EL Montclair EL Woodlawn EL Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 19 1 P a Los Encinos Ses West Oso ISD West Oso JH Kaffie Middle Wynn Seale Metropolitan School Of Design Galvan EL Kolda EL Kostoryz EL West Oso ISD West Oso EL Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Int West Oso ISD West Oso HS CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen East EL Richard Milburn Alter HigHSchool Haas Middle Discovery School Of Science And Technology West Oso ISD Kennedy EL Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway HS Early Childhood DevELopment Ctr CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen Middle Meadowbrook EL Gibson EL Cullen Middle Yeager EL Dr M L Garza -Gonzalez Charter School Dr M L Garza - Gonzalez Charter School Garcia EL Dawson EL CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen Charter HS Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Middle Club Estates CalaIlen ISD Magee EL Dr M L Garza -Gonzalez Charter School AccELerated Learning Center Mary Grett School CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen HS Cunningham Middle Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 20 1 P a Figure 14-9. Soil Expansibility for City of Corpus Christi r1uyiiu, 111111111 IN 1 00 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 11,00,111111111,10,00,0111 11111111'1', 11111111111 1111 01,01411111111,111111111 zm� III 111111111111111111111 lo oill.1. 1111 Ill 11111111l 11 01111111111111,, •1 n1ll illW', 1111,11 0111 111111111. 1111111111111111 mm1111 11111d" 11111111111111111111 ' Irl I� 6titiyiliiH h,�U YimT ; ww111IIIII111111IIIiII' PlY»^;rEpp hww„',PIV,1V www, PEEP ,lEPCal fPrr ,11 w,wor mir PVP w wstEw Pr ,wwwww, ,srlr'rl PPE T' a' IEWEparprEPPE luu!ul1 „„ ro, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 21 1 P City of Driscoll Expansive Soils Hazard SISSISSIMINWI • FaISSI SISIVA MSS Ongoing 111114 AMISS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) 00 »��, 0n,7 lul »i lu�»ia»77 ,i� �oo���o»� lAa,711o,1a» i l 1 \ \ � 1. 1 V 1l 11 1, \ 1 � � v , 1 1 � \ 1 I ssss , 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\��,,,�„�,,,,�,�,,�„�;��,�,��,,,,��,��11„���„`�,,,,,,�,�,,�,,,,,��,���n,,,��,,,�,,,,�,���n,,,,,�ll�l,�,,,,�„��„�,1�„N�,I,,,,,,,�,,,»»`�,� �,,��,,,;��,m�l��,�,,,�,,, �„�„�,>I�„��1,,,,,��,,,,,,�,�„�Il�ll�,�l�n�l,,,,,�„�,,,�I�I�»,�„�1„I;I,I�,iii,�,����1�1������1�1����������������������������������������� 1 \ \ 1 11 � ti, 1 �� �, a ,1111 � �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1�1���������������\�,,;Il��„�,,,�,,;�,,,�,III,,,�,,,�,�,,,,�„���,1I�„��»1,�,�1�`��,,,����1��1��1����1��1�0�1�`�`�������������\�� �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1�1���������������,,,,��1,,,,,�,�„��„��,��,��11�,�,��,,,,�,�,,,�1�,,�»,�„�1„m�l�„������\�11��\�1�������1��1������������������ pp�� 1111111���1 » ��o»» o,,,,,»�n ` »»� ,��„i���, ��,»��»»» ,� » nu »„» »i,o�u oa ,�„�,�ux �,,,w�oa 11 1 �, 11, �\ 1 „ 01„� \ �\ � » \ 1 1 l l 1 � � 1 1 1\ 1 1 1 \ 1 1 � � J � l 4 1 d \ n„ � n„ ```1 � , � y� l 11 1 , +�1 (IY 1 Ym��,1 ex �IY� u ����0\�\��������\�����,,,�,�,1,,,�7„�„�I„�,,;�111�1���������������� ����0\�\��������\�1,�,�7�17,�,,,�„1�1,�,,;�;,�,,,,»�\1�1\011�1���������..����0\�\��������\������„�„m�1,,,��,,,�1„�„�,,,���`�1����������������� ����0\�\��������,�I�I�„�,,,�,,,�Il�;�„�„�7„�,»��������\��` n„ ,, mum � 1 1117 »�h ol\�»» 1 1 »�h � lll,»» � 1 1117 »�h �1\�»» � 1 � 0117 � � t 1 l � 1 \1 1 1 \ �\ 1 1 1 �� a ��� � 1 �1111�11111�\1���\I�1111\�1111�������\��1�\���I,\`�111�\�\���``11�, ��\„7,1��,i�1�„�„1�7„�„»�1,,,,,�,�„��,,1��„N�i\1��11�1 ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1� ��„�„„�i11,�����7„�,»�,,,,,,,��,h;�„����,tis111�� ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1� ��1�\„�»��,hh,,�„1�7„�7„�1,,,,»»I„i;�„���,,,���`�'��1�1�1 ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1� „m�l�„ill,����h,,,,�„�1,�,,,,��hi��71���,�,���� ��1�1,�0111 LOW $0 0% 0 MODERATE $0 0 HIGH $120,200 100% 9 VERY HIGH $13,134,900 105 TOTAL $13,255,100 114 0% $6,500 $0 100% $0 $25,495,800 $25,502,300 0% 15 2% 0 100% 332 98% 383 730 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 111 \\ \\\\\\1111111111»1111117111111\ 1111111111111111111111111�111� � \111\ 1111111111111111111 l 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1��1��1��1��1�01��0���\�\0�\��������������������»»�»�,,,�`�1»�,1,,,»�»X11,,,,1�1,,,»�,�,,,»�1��,,,���,; »,,,,,,,» »� ��� �11��,1�7,IIIlI,,,�1� »\l» »„ll,�l,,,,»»»,» »» �I 1111»I�I1�1 „I,II,� \»»»»�»»»»»»» 11 I » 11 11 \ »llll 111. 1 111 � l 1 � � I �U U 1 V� II � � ,� 171. 171 I .171..1 ���u, ����`��`����1���������`����������������������������������������������� »�\I,�»I�1�»�1 ��1,�1��»,��,��II�����1»,�I�»��»,��1�»»�,��II���`�»��,���»,�I�,��1�»»��,�I`�»�111�»,����I�»�1���1�����1»,�I��»,��1��������������1����������������������������������������������������� 1,11vtati4t �,,� uc\ VERY HIGH SCHOOL Driscoll ISD Driscoll EL & Middle Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 22 1 If” ,u L ..,.,,I.11il�lljllPllrl''N llllluulul Figure 14-10. Soil Expansibility for City of Driscoll I1I1I,lIII �^µ1�%I�II��'I'i IId1(�1IU�II�•I� I�"11(„I��l�;l�l�,l�1 'lIl4 11\1l�il I;I1liIII ll�lumu°l',umIullulllIl!Il!IIlIullulllluipil)i l!i,IIlIII111I�NIIp 111 p1II";IuI"'�il�lYIlpIl1�1�i1llI1liY„'iI' "uV�111�t^`l�IN`rllllV1�11l1I1, lViI�7uoIIII�IIIIIi1lIlIl�IIIIIllI lll�Illll.�lI�, .1 o��1"lull�lr”lI, II .11,1111�IIldIlIlh InI' II„Iu� „ �",d�I`.�gl�lll,l11l1Il1�I1lI1lllIll II lllll:il l"iI�liI' I IlIuV�I1�1 ". ll11111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111,11 IIIII 111111111111111111 luuu111111111 II IVIlIlIlIlII.'��ulIuvvl dml 1111111111111111111111 lr,lllllllllllllllllllillllIllIIIII11111IIY1IIIIIIII"innnIlll1l Ilii+Illoillllllllllll` VlIIIl`�1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II Ip, IIIumiiiuuuumm!1)1)))) l uVIIIIIplipIIIVIIIIIIIiIlII ( Yl�VII1l11Io omIo�I � 111111111'1'1'1111111'11111111111 „„„ N 111IIIII11111111111 I1111I:II1II1IIIIIIIIIII lI III ,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111„ IlIlIlI IIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIp 11 111a11III1llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll11111u 1 1 1d11111111 VIIVVV101 uuuulN'IN1I'dl I„ai,IIIIIII�II.II.IIutluuuu'lulu lls l IIII �N11 llil l'ull VV1l�Y'I'�II (IMMjI l�lII''1 „'i m11IY11 1)1111110 NW1,11,11,1111011,11,,,'II �!Il" IV11..111 j�ljj'VIimif1NN !u uuul�ulu I�I� MIR I'�hmmmllWlullpl ll �h 1 1111111111111111111 d 1s III 1111 11111111111111111111)11 �I�1t1 muuumx13VAN li'�1�liilll lllllll I I� �lI IV n lJJ I� II�,I I�11111111I III 111I,II1111111111191 IIP lull° lel o111 1 III I� I I 1'I 1V ,I 11,1111'l 11111111 111111111111111111 1111111111)))) 1,111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1, 11111 1°"1111111111111111,1111111111111111111111111,11111111111111111,11, 111 111111 1, 1, 11'luumuuuuuum lll'111111;IIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 �1I,u 111r 11 1��„1111,111,11,11,11,11111111,11,1111111111111111 mIuOI�:!um:U:1UmUm�U�UUUN 1mmlNm�VNWNdIoUuf 111„ 1II Q u�m��IInuIIm1I�1mm1�� mm......�r 11O�I� li� 1 mmmmoolomImmmmlmW1NN1'III dII1IIdP1Wl IIImomNImmNNNNWNmWWm 1u1 IIuuuuuuuuuuuuuunlm1nnuuuuuuuumluumaauluu'louulunuuuun'ulouuumuunuuuu11u11111 I1j1� m'Im :1Im,1VIIIIWIIIWIIl4II I1I,iItllI,Immm11nlmmmnmmmmnlmmollo III (II�. ” I1VVC,II @I1h"III";�1 II111^ u 1II11'1 1N1VI11I�1�I1I\II 1II��� I . � 11111g1�D III1, II11I1II III1� I1PiII1 ii1,MOMMl om 1 mmm1ImImuIW �N ,,,, ._,,,�'m hIII1 u���� � p l�lll � IVIIIIIII1I11%1��,,.�I1;I CI1 V��� IIII,II11 lII 11IIINlII�VuI MI.I11u.ImII. I1IVIIliI o M,11111, 11111111 �N.\�AlIl II�1pI�uSI�I11u Ii IuIi1,�II1l1I, I1I��!I1III 11lIII 1 IYlI IlloI'1If1'I ��Jll1�l,l6IIl111l'1IIP1,+�IIIi1�1w1I�11 pI'If 1V.I 1�1',1I1\11 IYIIIi1li1 11 l lll'I�lI 11�l1I l\i1.��+1I mu»I(I1����IiI�I11u1Pu1 V11l1II 111I�1I 11 I�uI�ulu11IIIIII�IIIIIIIII�T I1 �IN�1 nIJIu�I�5 4 ,norilwlm o mrm,11.'wn'" � 1V,10,110 -,,,N,,,"111414 r,". r ;r+1pIN „' 4,01.r tO M.',11,1944401, d141;"I'gvo IP14wn pIglin,sukawlogy 1111111111111 1\IA\ilpol���V^�\\\111111Wu�II�IIIIIl111 ,��III�•�����1111111111111 'I�la�li1m1Iu�l1III VI'��i�,,1 I1��f1I,�P ; 1„1 ^l;,,1 �1u1I1IIII ;1 n �plI WI1m�1111 )V111m11�411,Um� �,1�m���1�1m'il1g�II1I 1i��.u111��”„ld111�m"�l1I�1m”u1Ii��\mpmtl1 IVmIVn\m"m�VlI�",J„\III\I�"iII��I\IppIu II��I INmm"I1mVuu\mu\\„A�m\um mu'' 1 ''��"�uIYuuu'iuI um"u, I mmI°IImIIImIXllm1�l�u1I1'lII1�II1 yIIplimwll1 mlt l��l'VI�IImIII1�II1 IIIIm9I 1m1`1m1.11I�.un.'us' ��~nn1m�Il��imemumNm111N111111111 1111u11i11 1I1I IIIIIIIIII�I II�III 111111111 I IL�VII��MI�NII MII�III �II�IIIIII III uII I�IIII I111111111111111111 uI IIII vvl IIII�WMppIIlI ��l1I 111111111111,,,, III 1II1I1I1I 11111111 111111111111111111 I��II I 1I ''' 11110111010„1100000000000 IIiii%Io�II V V''iiuup1�1�1u11uuu111u��111111111111�1111111u11111111111111111111���IIIaIIIIII 111111 I„l „,,,,„11111,11111111111111 11 11111111 Ili^ NJtll�u�o1o11l1llhhlll�lul 1111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 23 1 IP ,u ,.x.11 r' City of Petronila Expansive Soils Hazard SSSSSSS\M.SltISS\S SSW ASS% Ongoing ISSIV " MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) o\ 00\ 00\�� »1 »i lu�»iai717 lig \00�\ \oo� 1Aa1711011a» i 1 1 \ \ � 1 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\�����»,�„�'�„��1„h„�,»,�„III,�;»,,1„»,�,�,»�,���»II��,»���\�1�0�1�����\�1�������������������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\�� \„ 1,,,11„1 »� �» �»»,��„ ,11„\,,,�,� \\,,,» „1» \,,,,1\,,,,,11,1111111,1,»w,»1,1111» �»�� �, »I 11�„1 »„ „»,»�»� �Ill,�\„�,\,,,»�,,,»»1 ,1,�\,,,�\, \\\\\\ 1,»„1,�,,,1,,,�\I„�,,,»„1„ „11 ».1 \, , , \\,\\ 1111,..11. ,,, � , , »,\ \�11„ 1, , » » I s 11 1 , \ 1 � 1 1 � n, 1 I� 1 1 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\,�,�1„�,»»��,,�»�111,�,�,»,»��,��I,,»,�,11�1;`,»,�,�„��,»,�;�,���n,,,��»„�,»»�,��1,,»ll»�1,�,»,�„Ill,��,�i�,»IIS,�,1„»,��,,,11„»��„��,�„1,�,»,�„II„�„�„II`I„�ii�,��,»,»�1„»,�,��,�Ilh��,��ll,��,»,�,»�„���„�,»�»�11�,ti1���,����1��0�1�\�1������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\�� \,\ la11,1 \\1,,,1,,,1,\» 1,1a » » 1 1 l U T l 01001\0110\1\11101101110011111 P 0 ( (1\1\ 1 \I11� �� n, n�1� � n \ � 1 1 �� � u, Ilnu ,� � 171 � � 171. � � �\��\\\\1��\�1�\��1�1�1���������������,,,�1�7�,»,�,��,,,,�,�,,�,»,��»,�„�„i��1,1���,,,���„�»�»,�„?11111\�1�1�1�\�������������������������� �\��\\\\1��\�1�\��1�1�1���������������\1,�,»X11,»„���„il�,»�»�»ISI»,�„�„�,»�»,�,SII„»,��,�,,,,17`w�»„�����\�\���1�\�������������������������� 1�� 1 011 \» a11U 7ullaln a 111 1a\o11\\ \\o11\Iloa 111u au 7i of »i »iia \\71 \\a\ \0110\o»\oa 1 111 1\\\\ I1 0\\\\ \ 1 u v u u 1 l 1 \ � t 1 1 1 1 nl � J l 1 1 1 m 1 m, � �� V � � 171 Y���, x 1 i � IY� u 1 11»111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`�\������i,@lll��io���lu�io��,l�io�i�,1�`�1��1�`��`�1�`�����1\1Il���m�»�Il�io��i�lio���`�`�`�`�1�������� ttiM �1 1��11�`1�111 1`11ti c tin7 as \\0 \l0» »I »ial 7aw1»sailno a71\ 011 \\01\0\» lual 7aw1»iai no a on oo as \l0» »I »ial 7aw1»sail lu 0 71\ 1» 1al 00» »i »ial 7aw1»iai �no u � \ 11\11\ 11 l l 1117 » 111 I `� »1\111» t l 111 I `� 1 11\l\\ 11 l l 1117 »111 .11111\ 11 ll 111 I1� \ \ 1 1� �� \ 11 1 1 � � \ 1 11�171 7, 1I�1��1�1�����1`�111�\�1���``II�1 �\,��„11»Ali„�„�m�,»,1111„�»,I��,�Iln„11`I1,�II�`�10� ��1�0\V,11�\\11�� �„�\�1„�I�1,�����1»,�,»111,»„1�,h1�»�I��,ti111 ��1�0\V,11�\\11�� ��1�„m�11„�I�1,����1,1»,�„111,»,����,11�7111�1�,1111��1���1 ��1��\�,,������� �„�\��,�I��I�,�„���1»,�,»111,»„�,h1�»�I��,til1\1 ��1�0\V,11�\\11 LOW $0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 0 MODERATE $0 0 $0 984 HIGH $0 100% 0 100% $453,000 100% 4,423 100% VERY HIGH $3,201,100 87 $3,261,800 5,486 TOTAL $3,201,100 87 $3,714,800 10,892 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 0% 11 was 0\ \0\\\\1111111 IIIII11111 11111111111\0110101101111 011110\1110111111111 \111 X11 ll 1 1Uti1,111111. \ ( 1 y � 5 1 1 .,� � X17 �������01�������0������������������������������������������������������� 1»1»„11»,1` 1,��,,,1»»��»,\„1»,11,1 ��,1 ,1,11111,11111111��111i11������ �\ »»\ »\\, »,»I»ill lll�,l l„1,1»�,Il l»VIII IIS„Il�l,,,lu»,»,1,,,\111 �1,» „»„ �1, ,1»,\ \\ 1\ 1 11\ 11 1 11111. all. 1 1111 ( 1 )1 U �111 �1 � 11 � I) ,� �1 1 Nr oA 11�11�1 1A1\��\\"`��\��1\»\\0001\�1�111111110010\1�\`I\`1111�����11111111111111�111111111111111111�1�1�����������������\\\\\\\\0\00\\000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ »\II»t���������������� VERY HIGH SCHOOL Bishop CISD Petronila EL Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 24 1 If" a L liPopp Figure 14-11. Soil Expansibility for City of Petronila ii�1I0UUU�,pINl I4 ^0 uI�M0.'uiV� u II 1111 Illr 111111 I I I ol 111111 PI III omuimpmm 1 , 111111111111111111111111111111111110100000100000000000000000000000 11����11� �IIIIII""""p111Ippppppppppppppppppppp1p,1p1p1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p11'pipll'P'P'pppppppppppppppp pp 1,111 Pi1:111fill 0111111111P 1 11 1001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100.0000 , IIIIIII1111111111111111111 11111111: 1011001001111.111111.0 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Iui 111111111111111111111111 111 1 11.1.11111111Apppppopoppoppopppopppoplly ........11111111111°" � ppPPPI PI PH } •hF tilti!,a11.1 PP pp:1pp pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp.p..ppp..„,ppppoppppppppppppppppppppppppppopppippppAppptpPP ,I„1„1, nuplippppippIIII111111111 IIII IIII IIII II II II I 111010010 IIS 11Ik111�I1111 IY11 II II' IIII 1 �I III IIII III 11111111111111111110011111111 I 111IdJpfy III 1,111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 o uiuH��i 1...0000000000110111111111 .00000 poompapappao IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII unnunnunnununInu111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II 'III III II A' OVA A (Pilurprzipp ?VOW AP! WiPPIP;114 ozzo 1 4) 4 ti 30p ml I ,yep �Iu� iii' JII w'Plp'4"1114 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 25 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Expansive Soils Hazard SISSISSIMI**I( SSSV\4 AIM Ongoing 111114 ASS% Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) \ I \ 1 � 1 \ I 1 1 10�011001o0a 11071 0a1v0 oua»i�al»i au 7 o011»a 0 o00v 001�0���»�as laa,l l0� �� \\ lall\ \ \\»111\111\\\ 111» \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 l �» T l \ 1\ 01001\0110\1\11101101110011111 P R 1 \1 1\ � \111 � n, n��� � n 1 1 » � pp�� 1110110�� 1 »i 71111 71111110�a� \ 1�0� 1a7 00� 1000\00 » uau 1a v Illllalll lol 1�001�011001o0a 11 1 \\ 011\\ \ \ 111 1\1\1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 11 1 I \ ex ti ti W 101/7100 aa1» lual 7aw1»iail 00 a \\0 \10 01� 11011 »I »ial 7aw1»iai 00 a \0a \\110\1 \\»\ »I »ial 7aw1»iail lu 0 7�\ 171 1a111o11 »I »ial 7aw1»iai � 0 0 n, 1 11\lllq 1 1 1117 »11 \ \111\111 l 1 »11 11\l\\11 l 1 111N »11 11111111 l 1 U�\ V „ 1 0 � 1 ) � 1 1 » 1 1 1 1 0 b � a �� » � 0 � 1 � 1 � 1 1 `�� 1 `»� 1 �1111�11111�11���11�\1111111\�������1��1�1�����1`��11�\�1���``II�, ��1��»7,1,��11�,�,�7»,�„»�I„»,�,�»��1»1��»N�i�1��11��1 ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��„m�l�»�i�l,����1„»,�,I�»�»»����,i��71���,�,������ ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��1�»�„1�,��11�,�,��7»�,»�1,,,»,�,�»i�71���,»�������1��1 ��1�1\1,,�\�1�1� �»�„�,�i�l,�,�„�1�„»�,»�,,,»»��,hl�»����,tis11 ��1�\»1101 LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $774,547,600 100% 499 100% $414,531,200 100% $0 $0 $0 $774,547,600 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 6,501 94% 0 $0 0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 422 6% 0 $0 0 499 $414,531,200 6,923 » » 111 \\ 11\0\\\\1111 1»1111@11111171111 11111111111111111 111111111IV1111� »1 \111111111111111@1111111 I \ 1 1 111 1 1 \ 1 1 1 p � 1 V� �� � I 171 »� ��0�11���1�1��1����1�������������������������������������������������������������������������, 1„»I,,,�,»���,,,�„7»�„��1„»,1�,11��, 7,,,,�,�7,,�,��»,���„ � �17„1,�,»,1,�„���,1���1„����„�,���11�10����1��1��1��1����������������������������������������������������������������������������� „��,\,,,»» »I�7»,771711111,\�„� �,1,,,�1,,,,,,,�11»111»ll �I1111»I�II�I ,lllll�,,,�,��,\��,1»» „1 » 111„ »1\,, .111.1 111 � 11 1 1 n »» ��1�11�01�11�01�0�1��1��`������������������������������������������������,»,»„7�»„� �I�»,�»„»�»,��Il�,�l,,,»,�„�»,7,�,1,,,»�»,��I1�1��,7�1,111,,,»,� »11� »„7�1�»�� „�„1»„7,x,11»�1���,,,�� ��,,,»,�1,,,»��011011111101111���1�1`������������������������������������������������� minln�1 ,.4 x`1 � �1 `11"��������� 111 1�1 1111�1�"”` 1 �r r � r r � » r ��� `II5V 1 LOW FIRE STATION SCHOOL Port Aransas Fire Department Port Aransas ISD Port Aransas HS Port Aransas ISD Olsen EL Port Aransas ISD Brundrett Middle Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 26 1 If” ,u L Figure 14-12. Soil Expansibility for City of Port Aransas 11111111111111111 a 14pooneorx,��,. 4,* coopty Fr$31,abon Act orp Pawn Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 27 1 P a d' a City of Robstown Expansive Soils Hazard ssssssslm\ "ssss .1\MV \ ASSI Ongoing MISS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) » I�ol \\\\» 11111 u�i1i111u all \\\�\�� »o\ »o\\»\\�o» nl \ \ \ \ 1 1 I � �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\��,,,,a„�,�a„�,���n,,,, �,,,�„�,,,ILII„a�l�,�,,,���,,;��i�l�,ii �,�,���1�����\�1�\�1��������������������������������������������������������������������� »\ »\\\\\\,\ ,17,71�allla7 ll�,\„�„\ »,aa �� ��I ����,,, »,1��\,\»�\,,,»,\»�,\„ »», �,1�111�„111 ,\„\\,» »»»,a,��„�\,,,,»» a�a,,,,� »„\\ »»„�a,�,,,,�»„»\»»„� \ \,,,111 \\ \ 111,1, 7„\ »1 , ,,,� 1, 11�\�\,,, \\ , \ 1 , , I ; 1 1 v 1 \ 1� � n�1 1 u \� �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\�,,,,,,,�11„��„���1„�„�,,,�,,,�r„�;,,,�1,�,,,,��,,,�,�,,,,��„X111,�,��,,,,�1�„��nl�„I�1�11„�„�al���,�i�,��i�„11„�,,,�„�„„�„��„N��,�,���111„�„�„�a,�,li�, ��,�,�,,,��„�„�,�\„�1��„X11,��1,,,��„Nlm�a„�,��„�I�I��„�ii��„ �1�11�1�1�1�1���1�1����`������������������������������������������� \, ,all, \ \\\»,1,,,,,\» 1,1a \ » » 1 1 » \ 1 11 1 » p�� � ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\����,,,�II1�,,,,,,�,,;�,1�1,,,1,,,�,��,�,,,,�„��n1�1��1„����,�,��I�a„��111111111ti1�1�1111�����������`������������� ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\��,,,,,,�I,,,,,,,,�a,��l,,,�,�„SII,,,�„�,,,,,,�,,,N�1�,,,,,,�,,,,,�,;,,,�����1�1�1�11111\\1��1�01���1�����������\� 1111\110��1 of a ���� la ��� »10�a� \ »0� laa ����� goo»\»o of u� au �a y ati��a��� �o� �oo»o� goo»\»o 11 1 \\ oll\\ \ \ 1 11 0\\\\ 1 » u , 1 , 1 \ 1 \ 1 11 1 1 � � 1 1 \ � � V 171 Y��� � .V � 171 ex �IY� �IY� u 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�`��ow711��n1111�o��7ouia1lo��0��`�1�1������������������ 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`�\����1171II����i��ol�llil�o��i�l�iu�i171111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111... 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�`�io111u�01111io��17o��i��o��ii�����`����������������� 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`����nt1\1II����o�o�ll��`�`�`���`� ��\1111 1`1 a a W ao 171 »» ���\\ 111 ulal 7awl7iail ao a »1 \10 0l� 11011 »i aial 7awl7iai ao a laa o» o» »0» »i aial 7awl7iail lu \� 7�\ 171 \a111o» »i aial 7awl7iai � ao u n, \ 11\111 q 1 1 111N 111 \ \111\111 1 1 111 11\\\\ 11 1 1 111N a�\ .11111111 1 1 111 „ 1 0 7 1 1 7 1 1 » 1 7 � 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 � b 17 a 171 7- 1v �1111�11111�11���11�11111�1111�������1��1�1�����1`�\11�1�1���``11�, ��1��„7,1,��11�,�,X71,�„1�7,,,,�,�„��1,1��„N�i\1��11��1 ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��„mll�„ill,����la„�„�I,�,,,,����,i��71���,�,������ ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��1�„�„1�,��11�,�,��11,�,1�1,,,,,,�,�„i��71���,,,�������1��1 ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1�\„�„�,�i��,�,�„�1�,1,�,1�,,,,,,,��,h��1����,tis111 ��1�0\V,1�1��11 LOW MODERATE $5,571,100 HIGH $8,007,900 100% VERY HIGH $169,866,500 TOTAL $183,445,500 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 $0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 18 0% 37 $1,953,000 1,084 32 100% $634,900 100% 2,027 100% 634 $148,802,500 7,109 703 $151,390,400 10,238 11 111 0\ \0\\\\1 111111»111111111 1110111\101 �\1111\1111111 1111111111111111111111 \\11111.1\ l I�1111111 \ 11 \ 1 1 i ,,,11,»I�I»�,1�7,11111,,,1,1„� �,1,,,1,,,,,,,,»,»,,,»II �I1111»711» 11,,,,,,», X1111111,11„1,,,,,,,,,,1, „1.»I, 1„»1,,,.111.1 11,.1.„ 1 \1 1 n 1 ��1�11�01�11�01�0�1��1��`��������������,,,x,»,�7�`�,»771»�1»111,�17�1,1�„77, „��„777,�,,,77�,»111,�,1��,1��,11,»,7,u,�,`�,,,771,��7�1�7�,,,,77�„II,»�,I��»��,�„1»al»,7»�����������������`�`������������������������������������� 1119 » 17 \\ N1`.\\'\ ��\ VERY HIGH EOC SCHOOL Robstown Emergency Operations Center Robstown ISD Robstown HS Robstown ISD Seale JH Robstown ISD Hattie Martin Early Childhood Center Robstown ISD Solomon P Ortiz Int Robstown ISD Lotspeich EL Robstown ISD Robert Driscoll Jr EL Robstown ISD San Pedro EL Robstown ISD Salazar Crossroads Academy Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 28 1 P a L Figure 14-13. Soil Expansibility for City of Robstown lilll�',oIl"'I'IlNm11111I" lj 111111111111 111 1 ul1 IIII Ib1�101111' uIlm,Ip,p,, Il141d pp 01d1fl�11111111111 ,III IIII 1111III�Ilppgp,11�I11V1111�'' 1`����?` fl�IL!GIIIIIII�11 111111 111111111111111111111 u1111d�011111V gJllll� 011110111111111111111111111V11111SNI 1111 111111100000000000000 MMMMMMMMuMHI uluuu 111 1111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 111111111111111111 1111111111 i 11111001/ 1� u��w'1'1'1 11IIIIIVIVIIIVIVd"' "MNlllllllllfllll�1111111 1001010111111110001000,00,01 pulIIlyI'l�11�II 11 ouh'w "uIlail I luJ ») ll hII IIId111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 111 111 1,l1 1111)0 IIIY'1111111111i 1 1 1 111111 1.1 III" I�IIIIIIIfI �I 1lldllldd 111100000000,11,111111111110111111111111 X11 �rIIIII '11,!0v11 1 1I111119ii�111,II1,II,d,F1�1l1`IId' I1l'1i11 111,1^�1''d'1��I1',1I h11l„'iiIl'IiilIi4191�V���I�I("1II0dp�u 4l�1h,II I1I v.II h,dllbIN IIIIOY 1111I11 vv"„ V Ip0 III 10 IIIIIIIII II 10/Ifl 0�1 1N 110 9Vd'IM �11 Ilt�,110 0111^ IIII IIII"1' 1111 00"0"010101111111111111111111111,101011001".111I111111 ll 01111 lull l ;l �1i1�' Till Ilgl IIY11) i 1fl, ql IIm00v;0 I I II IjGN�qBIII N0g' 1I1II1 I1Ii,dy1'il'�1ryNV�I1ri�IIlppI110!1`1llQ1111liI11''I�Il'"N 111d�„ ''' 1iI11d,I-,11I �1 II�11I II0I11 I�V1IR, V`III ''1111:11 1rII,IIu'IIIil��If1iN1111111 liI1"l"l II�i'' ,1IlVY loI1(1I�IQI11 11111111111111 1111111 1411011 vvv,111 ' I �1P I I 111irI(dpI1 ,, IIIIti 111111I',,11u0 01VGpd, 1y ,1,1ll',I1j,IiII'I,1i11PI�11V Vpi111l'1111IIIl�0`II11 ,I",IIIII�D,^��y0 1@II11'III I IIGAIlj" 1,1 ��v�IIx lIIl�IIiI,IlII1 I11I 'd�011�lIli0�`N I11l' I10 111N,0�1'lu0VI lL11[1:01:1 ,111,0p� 1111I� l�1'111111IdU 041 00 u111I11 01 1 ^III I hll� 1 I�11 I , 1 1 IIIIIIII 11 1 III 1111111111111II 1I�1o1 1,1 in II III ,11 r1h11� 0O0 IoI°I0t�"0 I1I1 11u I1rI1Iu!iYu�111I I 11,Iy11lI Il aud 11ydII 0N„� 1'NV I 11„Ii� 1II 100 110 oo llll lllll, 111111 ,1,11,1),1 1 11 � 1111 11 1 1 lP 11 11 11cIi m1II 1u11111u011lIlllllllilllulum1l11P 11II II1 V1III Ill 1111111111111111111 NWIV 1f"IlI11111101,'„ I11II'1dII Illlll11VlIill11 01,1 11111 11 11 I;1I,, I� 1II1ill TN M''sr1 •001, ,01Co1�'11,011ys;ban IF"'Wirt '6„0„A ILA porembdte 1111 111141111111 an 00 041 0014 11' 00 0000000000 00 1111111111 II 11IiIIliidl 11111111111111, hlN11'1I111111111'11„11111111110111,„110101„11iIiI i 1�1111111111 I11 111% 0GI'illail 01111110 Io111/00100 0IIGI1111�11l fl11 , v111V 0010,0411111111 010 0 1011111 1111111 1'1 "111111011,11111111011111111,11111,11111"0""1""! vvol0ulillllll 1 IIII nll 11111 ))))11:1VVVVVVV11111111111i'NIII III ;41191I' �III'i11111111Q'0,11,11IIW1II 1Nluuuuuu 19VIII , ,VI 111111111111111111111111111 10111111111111111111111110011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100 Mol uu 0!!1„1. i11V1 11 111111111 111111111111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 11111 iilw�� pIIIIIIIIIIIIIl1111111111111111111 11111 mpIN "'1dajIIpMN�m. "I,fl!i"�II1I�� IIIIIIrvUIi I, 1.19!11I III 1, 11 Iii; s V�41 NGI II ��IY 0mII V0� „10 vv� w1w111w111w11111v11 1w111111111111 111 e am M M1p I10I!III u 1111 'IVal I pIII 1„ ''' II "'' 1111111111111111111 „vv vi I I, 11111,11v,111011 111 NI '1111.11.111:1111111111.110.1 11IIII 11111 0 ... ' 0 m 100„„u�1.1 11111111111111111111111111 Ivivoloolov 11111111101010101010101011111111111111111111111111111 10011 mw14000111100.10011 ��� IflflVlilaul l ���� Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 29 111111, ,u 0v„11 7;' Port of Corpus Christi Authority Expansive Soils Hazard sssssss\m\A""sss SSW ASS% Ongoing SSSSV 6\ \ MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) oo\o »� 1» 1u�»iuuuu ul lui�u lulu ulv7la»gal i 1 1 1 1 1 1 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\�,,,��I,,,�;��,���1„�,,,�»,�„�`1„�»,X111,�»„����,»,�,�»�����,�����������\�\������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\���� \\\, »,\,,,,1» »� »I �»��,��„ ,11,,,,,,�,� \\,,,» „�» \,,,,,\,,,,,11,1111111,1,»w,»1,111,,,,, �,,,, ,»,» 1» ,,,,,,,111»I�III��I,,,»„»»»I ,1„�\„�,\\„\,,,,,,,"�,,,,,,,�,\„�,,,»,,,,, „�� ».1 „, \\,\\ 1111,. ,” ,,,1a ,, „\\��,,,„ , 1 11 11 \\ \ � 1„n, 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\�����,»,,,,�„�„�»�»��1„�h,�»„�„���I,��,���»„��,,�,�»„�, n,���,,,,�„»�„���,��11��,�»,�„�`l,�»�i��,tis�,111,�»„�„�11`�,�»��„��nl,�,�l��l�, �„�»,��,,,����s��»���,��,�»„�1,�»„�,���,,,���I�„��,��I,»„�,�„���I�,,,�»�»N��,�ii�,���1�11�1�1����\�1�1�`�`�`������������������������������������� \„ ,x1111 7y,11,1,,,,,\\,,1,1a \1 1 1 \��11�\I��1��1��1 ��111���111, 1 \ 1 111„ 1 » 1 � �� n, �� �� �,, a,�llll ” � � �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1����������������\„��1�1„�»,1»;�,»11„1,,,�,»�,�»„1„��n,�1i�„�i��,�,��„,,,,��1�1�111�1�1�1�1������������������������ �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1����������������\���,»„�11,,,,�»1„�`1„��,1„���1,���1»„�1,�,��1,,1�,»,�,1,1,�,�1�,,����1��������1��1�0�1�`�`�������������\��� 1\11111��� 1 a u�l�»�a� uluuuuu �o lu man �U uuuuun �»� luuli�u\I \\o�u\I�oa 11 1 1111 1 sl 111\\ �� � u l l la \ 1 1 1 \ 5 l 1 1 J \\ � U 1 ` � 171. �. �....V 171. �w,l i i m IY swam=1111111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`���111�11�aio�o�ll��i��»o��o��i171111111,1,1,"1�1��� 1111111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`�\�������» i@lll�»o���lu»o��,l»o�i�,1�`�1��1�`��`�1�`�� 1111111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`�\�����ofl111�11iio��u���11�1���iii�����oa�`������\����`�`�1 e t t 111111111 1» �n11111 111111 116wu17111 Ilo 6 taint \\0 X1111111 111111 116wu1711 Ilo 6 1111 1111 \» �n11111 111111 116wu17111 Ilo 6 TEM \\0 X1111111 111111 116wu1711 � ��� » n, 11/11/11 I t 1117 \ Olp 11\111 q 1 t Olp \ 11111111 I t 1117 Olp 11\111 q 1 t 1\1 ( U 1 0 ( ( U ( U 1 0 1 � 1 � ��1�1,�01111 �»�„„�i�1,���117„�,»�1„»„��,h��»1���,tis11 ��1�1,�011� ��1�0„��7�»��1„�1,17,�»„�11,»,�,»1„��n,�1��1„������������ ��1�1,�011� �»�„„�i�1,���117„�,»�1„»„��,h��»1���,tis111 ��1�0\1\1�1,���11�11�1�1�111 LOW $0 0 $96,761,800 56% MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $0 0 so $0 $0 $0 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 919 51 0 $71,545,000 44% 3,642 88% 0 $5,719,900 2,971 0 $174,026,700 7,583 12% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 30 1 P a L Figure 14-11. Soil Expansibility for Port of Corpus Christi Authority f!a!^1V)1yli bf i it in fri 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 000000111111111110 �flil�awm�iii n"41xxol�ay tyr1000 1i,rrcmsa'diiaX,k,s 1x1X gla:414 Mii7igp uaxmroan,Ar,,Mm;'ra'rSSURGO Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 31 1 IIP a d' e ofta 111 1111IIIII111111111111111 111111 III 1111 1 �nirrr 'art' prr Dam and Levee Failure Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 12 City of Agua Dulce Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Bishop Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Petronila Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Robstown Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 18 Dam and Levee Failure Hazard Overview Description A dam is a barrier that is constructed to hold back water. A dam failure is a systematic failure of a dam structure resulting in the uncontrolled release of water, often resulting in floods that could exceed the 100 -year flood plain boundaries.1 A levee is an embankment built to prevent overflow from a body of water. A levee failure is when a levee embankment fails, or is intentionally breached, causing the previously contained water to flood the land behind the levee. Location Dams There are six dams located within Nueces County as indicated in Tale 15-1, Table 15-2 and Figure 15-1. Locations impacted by dam failure are the areas downstream from the dams. These areas can expect a degree of inundation from flood waters, depending upon the severity of the dam failure. It is also possible that some areas upstream will be impacted by receding water levels, though these impacts are not likely to be damaging. Opportunities for recreation, irrigation, and industrial use may be reduced if reservoir water levels fall beneath their normal levels. There is a general data deficiency for these small dams. Dam -specific inundation maps do not exist for these dams. This data deficiency includes extent. Without inundation 1 The State of Texas Mitigation Plan, Updated 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 1 1 Ii" ,n maps, extent cannot be measured. Actions to correct these data deficiencies are proposed in Section 19. Nueces County Table 15-1. List of Dams by Jurisdiction SaSSIZIM MIS .1%\..\\‘‘.\\. 1 Belvy Lake Dam 2 Chapman Ranch Lake Dam 3 Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam 4 Barney M Davis Cooling Reservoir Dam Corpus Christi 5 Calallen Reservoir Dam 6 Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 2 1 P a Table 15-2. List of Dams Located within Nueces County* I' g11�1111 11\11\\; \11 IL it O O O O O a vco -Q '0 .5 '0 .5 '0 N -- a) a) a) a) a) Q X N a z z z z z N N 72 c N U Q L O (6 Q .� Q . Q > > Uao J CSU ,a 8 W 00 — E 7)s- 0_(, ai COLgV .� N- _ O CO ' o 1 O 2CL co N— co co M1a a, s o * o o) o) v X zb'D a c o 9 al 0 C 0 0 E X W al w L > 2 E �1 (0 Z * Z Z Z u til O ;moo LoTsLoTsLoTsLoTs�C LU w w w �v= a 2 8 ti CO CO N 0) 0) CO Earth Controlled o a p 7. aJ z o 0© CO O V `71N I� 8 O — '77, Q p T6E Oi N l0 8 O L X ij v _ O p O. u 5 3 0 LO CV CO 0 3 0 o co o co o c z ib (0 oN CV v I� Cb Ln CO I� -00 a N p N N N N N © s E E E O O W E N Y gs (6 (>6 NscD O p O O C C p (� a) �_ O O a) o O. O O a) U Z N N (� SC) O E 0 L 8 a a 8 L v u a > O O v E c N Q c 0 iv (T)2 2 LL a cm cm _ 0 ce 0 o a z z a` 0) c 3 0 QJ = 9 9 a = E J J J J J J COp 5 -6 W W En co p O K a OO _ O ac pw U L E u 2 54 4 coo > m , >7E ii a J•5 ro Q o Q c CC Y CC Cg E a) E '2 J N U v N E O E (6 E lo 'is) -LE Y O[ 8 i N O 07 (� 8 07 00 CJJ V L F z O O N co V LO c0 Vt at Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 3 1 If" a Figure 15-1: Map of Dams Located within Nueces County 140111441100410 11111111 dMm11111111 DIflIIGP;„;,6. 111111111 IIII1U M�' Nhv ° ro rol1111 o l v �'Biu uil';ssonrysirirts11I �qYr Ila I SII �a�.�,l �YItlUNw'r411�w r' wuWuw ,fir„i�.. aurtaill m1911�riNI,uIIAp v Irl �Iv, w � � �wal i�� „ x ilw..111114111'1'111'°1111111;114'Y w,°l114' tlz IN I a�1 fgd fel Mpl ��a�d aril uu as ilk s ji i,l11114giliiilfiilll 44444441,4441, I1444", 41G r4',WI0C,, '4« 44'44`4,34441 440114Nur ,call,wx,Mr,.;�,sa p1tlaza,vrp 044414 ,414 11v444404,4 Note, the City of Corpus Christi owns and operates two other dams and water supply system located outside of Nueces County. These two dams are the primary water sources for all of the jurisdictions within Nueces County, and provide supplementary water to other counties surrounding Nueces County. These water sources are the Lake Corpus Christi Dam, Choke Canyon Dam, and a water supply system that transports water from Lake Texana and the Colorado River called the Mary Rhodes Pipeline. Failure of the dams and pipeline systems, including their various support systems (ex., pump stations, reservoirs, etc.), would have a major impact, particularly if the failure occurred during a prolonged drought. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 4 1 IIS ,n d' e Levees Texas does not maintain a database of levees, however the US Army Corps of Engineers does maintain a national levee database but it is not an inclusive list. A search of the national database does not identify any levees within Nueces County; however, there are numerous levees owned and maintained by the City of Corpus Christi, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, and various refineries and industries. For example, the City of Corpus Christi owns and maintains the Salt Flats Levee and the Port/Museum Flood Wall which are part of the City's downtown flood protection system (Figure 15-2). The Port of Corpus Christi Authority also has a number of levees. In addition, many of the refineries and industries have constructed levees around their facilities, primarily to contain potential spills, but these levees may also provide some level of protection from hurricane surge waters. 1 IP Lime Figure 15-2. Salt Flats Levee Flood Protection System APPPP fiz k i • M scum FdYirfl 1111111111111111111 1000000000011111111 trot) SPOOK err Kinney Simi Pump t Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 5 1 P a Extent The Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (FEMA publication No. 333, dated April 2004) provides guidelines for determining the potential hazard classification for dams with "the understanding that the failure of any dam or water -retaining structure, no matter how small, could represent a danger to the downstream life and property." The guideline establishes three classification levels of Low, Significant and High as indicated in Table 15-3. . A31\1\rpr\A . Low Significant High Table 15-3: Dam Hazard Classifications 1111•1111None ExpectedPossible, but not expectedProbable. One or more expected rx,x,,,Arr,)%,111.„131,1,1,1111' Low and generally limited to owner Yes Yes (but not necessary for this classification) The Texas Emergency Action Planning website indicates that in 2005 the Texas attorney general ruled that dam hazard classifications are exempt from disclosure under the state's Public Information Act due to Homeland Security concerns. Dam failures can occur as a collapse or breach of the structure. Dam failures my result from one or more of the following conditions: • Long periods of rainfall and flooding; • Insufficient spillway capacity, resulting in embankment overtopping; • Internal erosion caused by leaking or piping; • Cathodic corrosion of concrete reinforcement; • Maintenance problems, including failures in debris removal, repairs, or gate and valve maintenance; • Poor design or construction; • Dam failure upstream inundating the downstream dam; • Erosion caused by wind -driven waves; • Intentional sabotage; • Land subsidence; or • Earthquakes. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 6 1 P a A levee is a manmade embankment or structure built along a river, sea or other body of water to protect the adjacent land from flooding. A levee failure is the systematic failure of the levee structure or levee system resulting in the uncontrolled release of water. The more common causes of levee failure include: • Overtopping; • Erosion; • Structural Instability; • Piping/under seepage; or • Settlement.2 There is no state inspection or safety program, and there is no database for levee systems in Texas3. FEMA requires that a levees be certified to meet federal design, construction, maintenance and operation standards to adequately reduce the risk of flooding from a major flood. A general data deficiency exists for levee hazards. Levee -specific inundation maps and extent data do not exist. Actions are proposed in Section 19 to correct this data deficiency. When this data deficiency is corrected, clearly defined location and extent data can be incorporated into future planning efforts. The State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan (updated 2013) indicates that the "extent for dam inundation is recorded in terms of the area impacted by the number of feet of water and documentation of what is vulnerable and the loss that can occur." The State plan also indicates that "profiling dam failure continues to be problematic for local mitigation planners. Mitigation's focus is not on the technical failure of a dam from any particular cause, but on the flood inundation area if there is a breach. The location of the flooding impact is a difficult measurement to identify and many planners express frustration over unavailability of access to dam emergency action plans that may provide the information they need. A 2005 opinion from the Texas Attorney General Office restricts access to those documents for security reasons. TCEQ supports the decision but will continue to work with local emergency management to share information whenever possible." Occurrences Dam Failures No previous occurrences of dam failure for dams located within any of the jurisdictions is known. However, as noted earlier, the City of Corpus Christi owns and operates two dams located outside of Nueces County. One of these dams, formerly named the La Fruta Dam, previously failed in 1930, but it was subsequently replaced with the Wesley Seale Dam on Lake Corpus Christi located at the intersection of San Patricio, Jim Wells 2 Congressional Briefing, FEMA, July 2013 3 The State of Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 Update Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 7 1 P a and Live Oak counties near the City of Mathis. The La Fruta dam was used to maintain a water source for the City of Corpus Christi. While the failure did not kill any humans, the loss of the dam represented the destruction of a $2.7 million investment. The city defaulted on the bonds used to fund the construction of the dam4. Levee Failures There is not a comprehensive database with records of levee failures. Levee repair and maintenance is on-going and costly. For example, in 2012 the US Army Corps of Engineers recommended spending $3.2M to repair levees located north of the Harbor Causeway (Hwy181) on the east side of the Inner Harbor adjacent to Nueces Bay (see Figure 15-3). These levee had been damages by a storm events and wave action which is a common contributor to levee failure. lam LoIIG1l tton of h'R 'v'ea ,II:i arnagetd by st anuaI+ that the US r l:'my Corps of Engin,' ir"s'. ,ecca.t urnea"rded spending 2M to it,ap'sr'6r'in; 'mt Figure 15-3: Location of Proposed Levee Repair Ism �wll'"�Yl�''IVG!Qnl4h"fllrip� yilYtl���ll' i, ChriStif Channel ri„^..+,. r real nwr,;� http://archive.caller.com/columnists/murphy-givens/mary-sutherland-la-fruta-and-coopers-alley-Ofed4b83-ad4d- 4460-e053-0100007f4e7b-359987491.html Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 8 1 P ,n d' e Probability Dam Failures There is no history of failures for any of the dams located within Nueces County. It is assumed that a dam failure within Nueces County is unlikely within the next 10 years. Levee Failures The probability of a levee failure is possible within the next 5 years based on the history of levee failures due to storm events and wave action since the CEPRA 2015 report indicates that three hurricanes impact the Texas coast every four years, and since the annual probability of a hurricane, tropical storm or tropical depression striking Nueces County is 6.9% as indicated in Section 5 — Hurricane & Tropical Storm of this plan. In addition, the minutes for the August 26, 2015, Corpus Christi Local Levee Partnership (LLPT) indicates that the City of Bishop levee and the City of Corpus Christi's Salt Flats levee system are not certified by FEMA which may indicate a greater risk for failure if these levees do not meet FEMA standards. Impact Dam Failures Dams provide benefits in the form of water for recreation, irrigation, human consumption (after treatment), industrial use, flood control, and hydroelectric power. Most dams contain relatively small volumes of water and do not pose a severe threat to downstream communities, however, a failure of a large dam could be catastrophic. It is assumed that all six of the dams located in Nueces County have a "Low" hazard classification based on the size, type and location of dams indicated in Figure 15-3 and Figure 15-4. A search for data on these dams resulted in the limited information contained in Figure 15-3. The six dams are relatively small and are located in rural or semi -rural areas of the County and City of Corpus Christi, with little to no residential or commercial development downstream of the dams so no loss of life is expected. Impacts would be limited to the dam itself and minimal damage to crops and the environment. Based on this limited data and assumed "Low" hazard classifications the impact of a dam failure in Nueces County is assumed to be low. If Unincorporated Nueces County or Corpus Christi dams were to fail, impacts are expected to be restricted to surrounding riparian corridors, agricultural areas, and to the dams themselves. Higher capacity dams with more vulnerable assets downstream of Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 9 1 P a them might cause power outages, destroy large areas of cropland, damage residential property, and displace vulnerable populations. However, due to the capacities, locations, and development surrounding the dams profiled in this Plan, these impacts are not anticipated in Nueces County. Levee Failures Failure of the City of Corpus Christi's Salt Flats levee during a 100 -year flood event would expose the City's Downtown district (see Figure 15-4) to flooding that might result in property damage and possible injury or loss of life. All of the property located in the Downtown flood zone represents roughly $1.1B. Levee failure in Corpus Christi could have significant impacts. Levee failure during a flood event could potentially lead to the inundation of the City's downtown areas. Power and other utility services could be interrupted. Commercial property could be flooded, leading to direct damages and indirect economic impacts over time. While the downtown area of Corpus Christi is not a major residential area, there are still residential property found in the area. Damage to this residential property will lead to displaced populations. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 10 1 P a Figure 15-4: Map of the Downtown Corpus Christi - 100 -year Flood Zone hatalb Field lean Ater Ni t, nu a„ oliVaai00! 4400.41, arotrratima rcr trtor,09,2t1: grP;Atoloon.ite50113 00„01,), take Failure of the levees adjacent to Nueces Bay would result in flooding of the area the levee was intended to protect, which may damage property but may also result in environmental damage if materials stored behind the levees were to erode into the bay. Vulnerability A March 21, 2016, newspaper article in the Corpus Christi Caller -Times indicates that Corpus Christi's downtown is located in a 100 -year floodplain and the existing Downtown Flood Protection System does not meet current standards for protection from a 100 -year event due to the uncertified Salt Flats Levee system. FEMA requires that all components of the levee be certified as "a freeboard deficient reach" which means that it is not vulnerable to a catastrophic failure. The article indicates a report prepared by one of the City's consultants indicates it would cost between $75M and $100M to overhaul the Downtown Flood Protection System to meet a 100 -year event. Vulnerability to dam failure has been examined by looking at the length of highway and railroad infrastructure downstream from the dams. There is a general data deficiency for these small dams. Dam -specific inundation maps do not exist for these dams. Consequently, it is difficult to develop a detailed vulnerability profile. Actions to correct these data deficiencies are proposed in Section 19. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 11 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levee Failure Hazard , \11111111X1111�1�11�1���1�����1\��1\����������������������������� I,�,�,����,,,�,�,�,�,M���\1\0111\0\01\�\�\0\01`���1`���1\���\����0�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ See Map mtiu , , ti1V , ,.. \ 11\111\11�1`�11�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�„�,,,����„����„����„�,�,Ih,,��,�,���„�,��,,,�ia�h,�,,,�„�,,,�„�,,,���1�1\110��1�`�1��1��`\\1\�����\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ No historical dam failures No levees present �\\\1\1\111\\1111\11111111111111\1�11�11\��1���������������������������������`�,� ,,��I,����� ��„�„���1�„� Dam failure — damage to dam and agricultural areas Levee failure — no levees present 1\1\11�11111111�1�111�1��1t„;';;''°';momtrmommm,,rm���11111111�1�1111111��1��1��1 Low 11\111\11�1`1111\�1������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\°;;„°"1;;°?';1';121�1�11�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\1��������0\�\�\�\0 Dam Failure: 1% annual chance in next 10 years 1\1\111111X111111111111111111\��1����������������������°;la,,l';11 �°;l�m;°n'°;; ;"",,111;;'r\1111\111111111\\\����\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�0 No major road way, no major highways in downstream from dams Despite the efforts of the planning team, inundation maps for the dams of Unincorporated Nueces County were not available. The dams in Unincorporated Nueces County, Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam and Chapman Ranch Lake Dam, are in relatively remote areas of the county. Failure of these dams is not expected to endanger critical facilities. Expected damages are restricted to nearby riparian corridors, agricultural areas, and the dams themselves. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 12 1 P a Figure 15-5. Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levees 0010000010000„„Hrl uu:: ��1UVU��II�!:.'�'i�hlPflioAaJllfl�' gyp.:' �4�V�ti mukom 11,11111,1,1 ;wluNni'!ivw:udl ��I idVifpl+i�; koI m4x00:: $40;roti, I 014,01(Y Dorn "nil Le:00 s Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 13 1 IIP a d' e City of Agua Dulce Dam and Levee Failure Hazard , , 11ii o00 alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� ai0o\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aa0la�ooaoal0a0�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111•VIII 1i01110a1�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111001 aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Bishop Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 111 1 1111 1 11 \ , 111110111 ala 111�o�o�'t\�\oa\»\ aaaaloloaaalaoala\\aaaa�o x111 ala aaaloaooa\oaolla111aalllllula,11aa1 111111u1111111111111111111111111I111alalaa�aa\ oo� aalaaaao0 o\ooaaal u1\lo\o>tolalll\,I�a1111a1111111 aolaalal aaaaa�aa\ \ �1�111 1y 1�\ 1111111/ \11 11 LII11� \ 1\\00 � 1111...\ � ti � 11 � 11 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\����l���,�`�1���1�,��������,�,���1���,��`�1������11,���,��\�,��,�I,��,�����;���1��,��1�,�1„'�� „������1,�����,�1�������1 �1��1,�������,��,�c11�,,�,�,���,��������\�,��1���������1��������������������� The City of Bishop has at least one levee, according to minutes from the Corpus Christi Local Levee Partnership (LLPT, August 26, 2015). Mapping of the existing levee not available. While the City of Bishop has this levee, it was determined through the risk assessment that the failure of this levee would not impact the jurisdiction. City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 1�11111\1\11�1�11�1�1��\�1�������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�EMMI��1�1X11111\101\\\1�1�01`��11��������1�\��0�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ See Map mtiu , , I1V , ,.. 11\111\1\11�1�11�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�„�,,,����„����„����„�,�,Ih,,�I,�,���„�,��,,,�ia�h,�,,,�„�,,,�„�,,,���1�1\110��1�`�1��1���\1\�����\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ No historical dam failures Levee repairs recommended in 2012 v� \�\�1\1\1\\\�1�\1�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\1„ll�„�I„��i,���„��,,,�1�,�„��1�„��1�\1�1�111\�1\1\111\�11��1\����\�������������������������������������� Dam failure — damage to dam and agricultural areas Levee failure — damage to downtown Corpus Christi 11\111\11�1�11�1�11�1�\�1��1���,,,,";;,'I''m:,,,ICu,,,iiT,rjm,ll'�iil�u";I,m u;;n1y„11,e�11\11�11�0�1011�001�0�������� Low 11\111\1\11�1�1111\�1������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�1°;;I „°"',;i';;°?';1';;»EP�111�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\1��������0\�\�\�\0 Dam Failure: 1% annual chance in next 10 years Levee failures: 5% annual chance in next 5 years 11\111\1\11�1�1111\�1������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ Erin�11;,�;;;?�A°1111�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\1��1������10\�\�\SIM 2.5 Miles of highway downstream of dams 0.6 Miles of railroad downstream of dams $757,124,377 in improved property behind levees The dam located in central Corpus Christi is the Oso Beach Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam. The dam is an earthen construction dam. The body of water produced by the dam is a decorative feature of a municipal golf course, also used for irrigation. The dam has a maximum capacity of 58 acre feet with an average capacity of 29 acre feet. A roughly 0.2 - mile -wide riparian corridor extends from the dam to Oso bay. Should the dam fail, this corridor would be expected to convey water from the dam to the bay. No structures exist within the riparian corridor. Damages from the failure of Oso Beach Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam are expected to be restricted to ecological damage to the riparian corridor and the dam itself. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 14 1 If" ,n The dam in the north western portion of Corpus Christi is the Calallen Reservoir Dam. The dam is a rock fill gravity dam. The dam is 195 wide, six feet high, and has a maximum capacity of 1,275 acre feet. Average capacity is 1,175 acre feet. The areas of Nueces County downstream of the Calallen Reservoir Dam are occupied by riparian corridors and open parkland. Residential, water -front development begins about two miles downstream from the dam. These properties are not expected to be impacted by failure of Calallen Reservoir Dam. The damages from a failure of Calallen reservoir dam are expected to be limited to ecological damage riparian corridors, minor damage to park benches or pavilions, and damage to the dam itself. Some portions of Interstate Highway 37 run parallel to the riparian corridor downstream of Calallen reservoir. While this length of highway is listed as a potential vulnerable asset in the jurisdictional table, it is not expected to be destroyed in a dam failure event. The location of the levee system protecting downtown Corpus Christi is shown in Figure 15-2. Downtown Corpus Christi and two of the City's Pump Stations are protected by the levee system. A levee failure would threaten the area bounded by the three levees. Approximately $757 million in improved property is protected by the levees. A failure of the levee system would threaten this property. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 15 1 P a Figure 15-6. City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levees 100010 11111111111111 d1 • !upoV4pd„ Vuf ;I fr;Wq,rl^rrp; 1N,ko: w:: s d;w amiry y PY''vilt • 4401 4a,140c.wtaa6' P4ldmx.awirt9 N�RNIp �a,aFUrc,aw Awltilv,t14 P111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 16 1 IIS ,n d' e City of Driscoll Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 11ii o11u alp III�ol000xalx�a� xiao\xoxoal�laaxx11110 ��� ala xxa11�o11oal uaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII uil 111aal�aaaaao\ o0o xoai� o0 o�xxoal � 011 aiu 111 liiluuiiluli 1111 out aal Ix�a�\o1o1 \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 1110111011.111111.1111ulllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Petronila Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 11ii o11u ala Ill�o�0000aao\a\ xiao\xoxoal�laaxx11110 aaa aia aaalalooaool aaala Illalallal 11111111111111111 VIII Ills 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 ooala o0 o�xxoal a o11 aiu lii liiluuiiluli liil out aal laaaa\oaol \ 100111 .011\ \0\\1 11101111111.111111.111 1uII111g1110 1 \\1111.0\0 .1111.111100..1 1 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,���1,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`�11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������11,���1����� a,1„��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Port Aransas Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 11111x111 ala lll�a�aaaxaax\a\ ala\al�laaaala\a������» �II� aal aaal�laa�alala111aa111111a11aa11111111111111111111111 I11I1I111alalaa�a�\ ��� „Illaa� �\aaaaal a ��1111I11111111�I1111�111111 a1aa1111 laaaa\���\ 111x111 11\\ 1 � \ \\ 11�01111111111i111 u„ lull liI1i11i � \ »\111. o\0 1I 11 I Ili X11 , \ This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Robstown Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 1111 xxx ala lll�a�aaaxxxx\a\ ala\al�laaaalala������» �II� aa1 aaal�laa�alala111aa111111a11aa11111111111111111111111 I11I1I111alalaa�a�\ ��� „Illaa� �\aaaaal a ��1111I11111111�I1111�111111 a1aa1111 laaaa\���\ 1 111x111 11\\ 1 x \ \\ 11�01111111111i111 u„ lull lil lilli � \ »\111. o\o II 11.1 I li xx , \ 1� 1 1 1.1. 1 � 1 � 1 1 � � 1 �. ����10�1��10�1���1����1����\���,���1,��`��,����1,�,1����1�,�,���\1����,��������1�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;� ��11�,��,�`��,� ��1�\�,������1��1��������1�� 1,�����11\,���1�����a,1„��,����,���,�,������,���,�1����� ��0�01������1�����1����������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 15 17 1P a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 1�11111\11�1�11�1�1��\�1������� MEEM��1�11111�1�0\\\\1�1X01`��11���������\��0�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ See Map » , ore ,o, u�,»u»ii,aaa�„ »„» »»,i m,� iii, 4� mtiu „ 1V , ... X11111111\11\1111111`\11�11�1�\�1�1��1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�,,,,�,,,,��,,,���,,,���,,,��,�,II„��,�,��„��„�,,,�ia�h,�,,,�„�,,,��„�,,,�1�1111�1�`1111�1�111�1�`11�1�1�1����������������������������������� No dams in jurisdiction Levee repairs recommended in 2012 v� \�\�1\�1\\\�1�\1�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�„ll�„�I„��i,���„��,,,�1�,�„��1�„��1�\\�1�111\�1\\\1�1\\�1\��\\��`I Levee failure — damage to downtown southeastern portion of jurisdiction 11\11�1\11�1�11�1�11�1�\�1aa�1���,,,,";'11ii°,":a,,,ICu,,,,'�°;;n; Jl,ll' �iili� u�";I,m im�11\11�11�0�1011�001�0�������� Low 11\111\11�1�1111\�1������\������\\\\\\\�\�\�\�\�\°�;;'r«»""',;,i`;;°MIE��"\111\1\\1������1\\\�0�\\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ Levee failure: 5% annual chance in next 5 years 11\111\11�1�11�11�\�1������\������\ \ \\\\\\\\\°;Ian„lEIZI,�111�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\ 1��' ������ 0\�\�\�\0� �\ $85,613,053 in improved property behind levees Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 18 1 P a Figure 15-8. Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levees 111,141,1101 x41 P44,84114111 044ffilatraylaa Niutx4r$ d:',ov� �rg NJt+"Bp4'hialbil'ulmndX IhNPo'7�T�� tags 7i 'u 015.0wC" P'1 n/ Dor44 Jed 14,4e44e444f Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 19 1 P ,n 444 m 01101,4 lrrar rpt/1r�-p 111111111 '1111117!Iril$111 111111 11 111111111 111' tHHHHHH 1 S1111111111111111-111111111 1!f11111' Ill 111111 1111 111' 111111 III Land Subsidence Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Land Subsidence Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Land Subsidence Hazard 7 City of Bishop Land Subsidence Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Land Subsidence Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Land Subsidence Hazard 11 City of Petronila Land Subsidence Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Land Subsidence Hazard 13 City of Robstown Land Subsidence Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Land Subsidence Hazard 15 Land Subsidence Hazard Overview Description Land subsidence is the decrease in the lands surface elevation due to the loss of subsurface support. Land subsidence can be caused by both natural processes and manmade actions. Land subsidence caused by natural processes typically occurs over a long period of time, usually thousands to millions of years. Short-term land subsidence is generally the result of manmade actions such as: excessive ground -water withdrawal, oil and gas drilling, mining operations, collapse of buried infrastructure like pipelines for water, sewer and storm or the leakage of underground pipes that erode adjacent soils. Subsidence from groundwater withdrawal and oil and gas production usually occur over large areas, while subsidence from collapsed or leaking pipelines is generally localized. Location Nueces County is one of the Texas coastal counties at high risk for land subsidences. Figure 16-1 illustrates the areas with the greatest land subsidence potential in Nueces County according to subsidence data from the 2015 Preliminary Flood Insurance Study for Nueces County. There are a total of eight areas within the county which have records of historic land subsidence; Areas No. 2 through No. 8 are no longer active. The only area of active subsidence identified within the county extent is the Saxet Oil and Gas Field, and is located within the City of Corpus Christi; this is shown at Area No. 1. 1 The 2013 State of Texas Mitigation Plan identified Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 1 1 Ii" ,n Figure 16-1. Map of Subsidence Areas in Nueces County u® 1 011 1,1,1,11'11 11111111110 1111111 1,P„, I11ioomu i,, 111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111,11111. +!!!!!! Illlpii Yiliiijj • 1111111 O.,.4" ya?N;palaro NOON, , Pt rx poi of NoNN Otrodone:N m�eunnm lm a lwwnulrlu uolwlx, 111,1 1,1 f1,114,0 ^+W, 11111,0,0„ry 14+.m*d 1141114;14 11. Extent Land subsidence extent is determined by the decrease in the lands surface elevation measured in feet. Figure 16-2 includes benchmarks, denoted with an "X", which indicate areas currently being observed for potential land subsidence. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 2 1 P Figure 16-2. Map of Historic Subsidence Areas in Nueces County Duict' IT 'II I ma, d�,mm nw imms m��pW:r ��u � * i x d 4 40 A !' irmepum e�xmar « mwaArMr��riw� mnxmrw�np rew4w+.'NdL'�!Nh: 4 iw iM'wb:I 11,1 Im."'. li;:i imam"Imlmtifdm ilNp1N4' 014144 wmi ill*, rim, 0401t V0a'400***411.14 0,4 OOP Wid400 *OW UN MY 1011plUM w w om N uVu a uu aao uu ti u: a oo1imou RE ICS ���0CT VE 13 m � C4V& Ote yiG lid] p12Jl525no'y F1524 2UU19410-m nCe' tuyy,dat01 Via ,y 15, NI OP ILLS, Source m xlpn pn00 Obi ibt Tem r ma m� moon Wwwwl w, A4100t040 8000000— 0„ W"4 w104404 O''44 4404$0,. 1 toupvoopo od � vo`acp'h { N r 4pI "wod f W,� m�l7rn� Or IP' Figures 16-1 and 16-2 depict areas of both active and inactive subsidence. The City of Petronila has not experienced active subsidence since 1980. Subsidence is not expected to occur in that area in the next five years. These maps indicate active subsidence only for Nueces County, the City of Corpus Christi, and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. Occurrences Land subsidence in Nueces County has been historically associated with ground -water withdrawal and oil and gas production. Seven areas of historical subsidence can be seen in Figures 16-1 and 16-2. The greatest period of subsidence in Nueces County took place Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 3 1 P a y from 1942-1975. The greatest loss of elevation experienced in Nueces County, a loss of 5.28 ft., is indicated as the Area of Active Subsidence in Figures 16-1 and 16-2. This area corresponds to the location of the Saxet Oil and Gas Field, suggesting that the subsidence experienced in this area is a result of the removal of subterranean oil, gas, and ground water. Probability Unlike other natural hazards that take place as discreet, acute events, land subsidence is a more chronic hazard. A probability presented in terms of the expected number of events per year is not an appropriate method of analysis for land subsidence. An area is either experiencing land subsidence or not. The probability of an area experiencing land subsidence is dependent upon a number of factors. Oil and gas extraction activity appears to be associated with subsidence in the area. The State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Action Plan reports that land subsidence is generally viewed to be an unlikely event, with one event possible in the next 10 years. The 2012 Coastal Bend Mitigation Action Plan, which includes Nueces County, reports that land subsidence "has been reviewed and is not widespread." Based upon these reports, with the exception of the area of active subsidence around the Saxet Oil and Gas field, a new land subsidence event is expected no more frequently than once every ten years for all participating jurisdictions. Impact Land subsidence in coastal areas can have significant environmental and socio-economic impacts. Land subsidence can cause structural damage to building and transportation systems such as roads and rail; damage buried infrastructure such as pipelines; cause sea level rise along the coast which increases vulnerability of coastal wetlands and beaches to coastal erosion and increased flooding. The impacts of land subsidence can be measured in terms of property damage. Vulnerability Land subsidence can damage vulnerable assets by causing damage to buildings, transportation infrastructure and buried pipelines. Vulnerability is included in the jurisdictional tables as a function of property value and critical assets contained within the areas of subsidence. Land subsidence, and the decrease in elevation associated with it has the potential to increase vulnerability by the following mechanisms: • Increase saltwater inundation in coastal areas • Increase the frequency of flooding • Increase in the extent of flooding Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 4 1 P a • Damage to fixed infrastructure • Losses to submerged aquatic vegetation • Changes to gradients in drainage channels, leading to channel erosion and sediment deposition In addition to direct impacts like damages to infrastructure, land subsidence may increase the impacts of flooding hazards. Impacts from flooding hazards are discussed in Section 6. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 5 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Land Subsidence Hazard 1 1 1\ �111\110\1\111\1��1�1�11�1������\�\������1„�,,,,�„�„�,���,�1�,��„���,,�„�,�„��,���I,�,I�,,�„�,�„�„�,��11�11�1111X10111�1�1�`��`�`������\. 111UIti1111 \ 001101111\1W».111\1\1\II \ 11111114dlllllll\I\111 111 \ 1 1 111111`1�`�`�`�`1�`�`�`�`����`�������on�,�a„»d�lluo��ou,�u,�i,���o,���1111�1111�11������������������ 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 5 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 6 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 7 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 8 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 00 0�\ll lle»> Ilii li�l�i\��1111i��a1 »� \o\\�\\ool l�olll�\�il�\\ \\I 5 \ 1 � 1 Q ��1��1�10��1���1�1��������������\������������������������������������������������������������������,»,»,,,1�»„�,,,�`�»,�»„»�»,`��,,,»�11„»,�1„»�I��„����,,,���1�1�1�0�01�01�01�����������������\������\����������������������������������������������������������� ��1��1�11�1��0���1�10�1����������\������`��»�\„»�,�I���\„»�»�,»�„��\,,,�\,,��,1,�,\,,,��010011111`�1��`�`�`������������������\�����\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\ \ .Ill\ 17� u ��1��1��1��1�01��\���������������\����������,»,,,�,»,»�„�»��1»�»,����»,,�»�1,,,�,��»„yll”��1�1��1��1��1��\�1������������\����������� ��1�1��1��1��1��1�01��\���������������\����������»,`�`»;\„»�»„�„�,,,�,,,,,»„�„�,���,»,�,�,»„�1�1�1�1�0�1��1��1��\�1������������\���������� $2,282,722 $9,293,714 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 16 6 1P a City of Agua Dulce Land Subsidence Hazard 11ii o11ii alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� aiao\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aaala�ooaoal aaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII liil 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111 oal aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 7 1 If" a City of Bishop Land Subsidence Hazard 11ii o11ii alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� aiao\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aaala�ooaoal aaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII liil 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111 oal aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 81 If" a City of Corpus Christi Land Subsidence Hazard �� „\111,,,,,,,,,�,�1���1„��111„1,11„�,,, 1�11,,a1,11,111,11 �� 11 11 .1.1....1.... 1 ��������������������������������������������1,,,,1,��,1,,'��,1,,,��,1,��,1,1`I1�1,�1�1,,,,1;�1,�`�„��1,1,,,,,�„1,,,������`����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 11,11 11 ,,, 1111111 �1„ 1 11 �1 1 1 Ilu�o» I�a�olo��a.11ll0l 11�11��11„11~,11`1 1111 11111111111 1 .1111 1 nt11111”�`�`1�1����`�`��`����`�������lao�w�11,�����,i�11����1�11,1�,�������������������������� nt11111"�`�`1�1����`�`��`����`�������� ���1,0���,���i���",��i�,�l����`�la���`��1��`�`1������`������`��������� nt11111”�`�`1�1����`�`��`����`�,�ao�i�1,��,���11a��i����`1����1�11��1���1�������������� 1918 — 1951, 1942 - 1975 Subsidence cluster 2 (see Fig. 16-1) 5.28 feet (1942 — 1975) Unreported 1918 — 1951, 1942 - 1975 Subsidence cluster 4 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 00\\0\ \\�\\001�011�111�1141111 Q \ 1 `11�1�111.11111111�11 � 1�,>,��11���������iit\\1�1,11�,1.11111111�11 � �><���,1111� ,11�11 11�1�11�, 11V1�11 111 ��„�� 11 1 11 11 1 1 � 1 10 ����� ,,,,., f ., ,,,,., u r o ,, a ,,,,., 1 i I1xxss11��111�i �t���u���n 11fl�fl�� 1 1 r , .,������������ �����11��1��111�IIn��,,,���1�������������� 1917 1942 4.05 25 0.162 1942 1950 1.10 8 0.138 1951 1959 1.76 8 0.220 1960 1975 2.00 15 0.133 2 1942 1975 5.28 33 0.160 3 1917 1975 9.33 58 0.161 4 2017 2022 0.80 5 0.161 5 calculated 1 1 1 Geothermal Resources of the Texas Gulf Coast Environmental Concerns Arising from the Production and Disposal of Geothermal Waters, by the Bureau of Economic Development, dated 1976 2 Land -surface subsidence in the Texas coastal region, by the USGS Report No. 80-969, dated 1980 3 Report No. 272 dated November 1982, titled ”Land -Surface Subsidence in the Texas Coastal Region” by the Texas Department of Water Resources 4 The Impact of Global Warming on Texas: Second Edition, by Jurgen Schmandt, et al, 2011 5 Forecasted amount of land subsidence using the average rate fron 1917 to 1975, based on FEMA's 2015 preliminary Flood Insurance Study indicating subsidence is currently occuring and should be anticipated. \\\\\\1 111111111111111111 MIME \11111.1\ l 1 5 � 1 ���\������01���������\�����������������,,,�,1�„�,,,1„�,,,1`�„1„�`���,1,1,,,�,111„�1��1,���,1,���0��\��01�0�0��1�1�������1��������������������������������������������������������������������� 111,E \ 1111 1111 \ 1 \111 \ 1 ��\1\\��0\1111�\!1111�1 11111011111 1111 ��) 111. � (11 � 1 1 t 1 �� 1 1 111�01�11��10�1����������������������������������������������������������� 11„,1,,,1„ I1,,,,1���,,,„,1,„,,,�1,,,,1,,,�,,„��1,�1,,,1„111110�01�111`101�`�������������������������������������������������������� 1,��>,�1�111>t,1,1"1.�� ���\1.1,1�11,1,1�,�1 11�111 � �� 11.11 11 ��11 1111111111�1�1�1�1�11�1�01�11�\���������������\����������,,,,,,�1,,,��„�„�„,�„�,,,�`��,,,�„,,,,�,�,,,,y,, X0111111111�1�1�1�1�11�1�01�11�\���������������\���������������,,,III���,,,,,�„�,��,,,,�,��,,,,�„���,,„�,,,,y1�1�111111111�1��1�1�1�1�11���`�������������\���������������� $2,752,155,876 $448,772,256 SSS\\,1„11:1,iu tt ,00,�31,��o�a„,��\��o,� 1�1 01� ��1�,. ��.. \1WS UAW i`� 111�11011111�101�11�0�%1��\� 1 Fire Station School Fire Station 9 - 501 Navigation Blvd. Corpus Christi, Tx 78408 Corpus Christi Isd Gibson EI Corpus Christi Isd Harold T Branch Academy For Career & Techn Tuloso-Midway Isd Tuloso-Midway Academic Career Center West Oso Isd Kennedy EI Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 9 1 If” a West Oso Isd West Oso EI West Oso Isd West Oso H S EOC Nueces County Emergency Operations Center Fire Station Fire Station 3 - 1401 Morgan Avenue Corpus Christi, Tx 78404 Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi 2 Hospital Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi Shoreline Dubuis Hospital Of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Isd Coles H S And Educational Center School Corpus Christi Isd Evans Ses *Reference Figure 16-1 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 10 1 P a City of Driscoll Land Subsidence Hazard 111 1 111 1 � 1 1 11111111111111111111111\1111111111 1111111111111�111�1111\111��11\•101111111111111111111�I�O11011��1111111111111 11111111111111111111100011011111111111111111•01111111111110 0100�1�1 11101110 01111��111�1111111011111011111�110�11 1111110 10 � 1 011111111...1111 11 01..1111.\\ 1 11..1.00 1 111 1 1 1 � 1 0 1 \ � 1 1 1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1�,����,��i�����1�,������1�1�„�,��1�„���,� ��\1������,�����,���,�1�������0,�;�`���,1�,��,�,�,����1���,�,�,�����1`I�`�����01����,���������,���,���,,������,���,����,��1�,� 1����� �� �1�10��1������������������ There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 16 11 1P a City of Petronila Land Subsidence Hazard of Doll alp ooiio�oo��o�11i 0\�\0�1���`I�oo�o�����\ �\� „1,,,1„1 alloy`o�o`I���1�»�Illa illllol�l �o` ��1,10���001,11,11111�11111 1111111111111111 Ill 1lllll�ll,,,ul, 111 olll alll �`���\o�ol1111011 ..01011. \ � \ \\ 11111111 111111/111 1111111111.00.. 1 1 1 11.,111 011 1 1\111. \ � 11 1 ( 1 1 1 \�0�1��10�10��1�0��100��11��1�,�1���, ��,����,����,��,����,1��1� ��������,�c�111�,�� ��„����>>������`0�,1��`�1��,��,���1��,�����,��,����,�11��`���1 ��,��„��`��1�,��,���,��,����1������ �\�����1����\����������� There are no records of subsidence after 1980 in the City of Petronila. Land subsidence is not expected to impact this jurisdiction and will not be profiled in this plan. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 12 1 If” a City of Port Aransas Land Subsidence Hazard �i 01111 iii lil\�o�0000��0\�\ �i�o\ao�o�l���\������o �\o �` 000\�loo� oo� ia�l� 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII 111111111`I���a���1 �o� �>titil�\ `o o���oal o\�ol�lo �I lol�lllllull 11110111 a� 1����\u�ol 1 11111111 ..011\ \0\\1 01�`11�1111111111111 1�II111III11� 1 1\1110\\ .1111.1 III0111� 1 111( \ (1 1 � � \ 1 1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���,�1,�,��\��,�,�����1�„����1���„�,���,������1�,�11�,���������,�������1��,�����1�,�����1,�"���������,���11„1��������11�� 1��1������\�,�o\�`��11��\�������1���,����1„����� ��������������1��������1����������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 13 1 If” a City of Robstown Land Subsidence Hazard 11ii o11ii alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� aiao\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aaala�ooaoal aaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII liil 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111 oal aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 16 14 1P a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Land Subsidence Hazard �1 1 1\ E,, a E, �\11\110\1\1�1�1��1�1�1�1������\�\��,»,»,»�1,�,»,�,,�,»,�,I,�,»,�,�„fi�l,�,»��I,,�»,�,»�„��11»��C\,,»,�»,�,»,��1`1�1�\0\1�1�1��������������\�\���\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\ ,,, ,,, ,,,,,,, 111UIti1111 \ 001101111\1W4.111\1\1\II \\11V�111111111\111 41 11 \11\1\ 1111 .1111 1 E tlll\`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`����`��������\�����������»��a��»w���»��»���II»����II���»�������I1t11,""`1�`�`�`�\�`�`�������������\��������� tlll\`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`����`��������\���»��������m���»��»��„i���V�1Nm��1111111�1„1�1�1�������������������\������ 1942 — Present Subsidence cluster 1 (see Fig. 16-1) 5.28 feet (1942 — 1975) 0\0\1 11111111111111141111411111111\111111�1111111111111� 5 1 \ 1 \\�01�1\\\0�1�\������������ 1\,1\,,,\\,,,\ \,,,,\\,\„"�„\\,�1,\\,,x,11\\1�1\��\\'11�1�\1�01S�\��\SS0��SS��������� 4 ,� \�\ „4 1114,11. l \ \111 \\'1�11�����11� 1�1 1����1 �11111� .�11� 1 1 111�01�11110�\\�����������„141,\,,\���,,,,,,\\„\,,'�1\,,,\„\,��\�1\,,„\,1�10�1�`1�1"�������������� $41,969,347* *property within subsidence zone 1. Properties within subsidence zone 1 include AEP Texas Central Company, Buckeye Texas Processing, Bucky's Navigation Inc, City of Corpus Christi, Coastal States Petroleum, Crossbridge LLC, Driscoll Foundation et al, Longhorn Transfer and Storage, M&G Resins USA LLC, Nueces County Navigation District, Port of Corpus Christi Authority, Union Pacific Railroad, and Valero Refining. The properties are generally industrial facilities with roles in shipping or the hydrocarbon petrochemical processing industry. Land subsidence is most likely to damage these facilities by damaging below -ground or transportation infrastructure. Land subsidence is not likely to directly impact populations. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority does not have resident populations. However, PCCA is a major employer in the area. Fortunately, in comparison with other natural hazards, the impacts of land subsidence are comparatively slow -acting. Land subsidence is not expected to represent an acute hazard to people or property. Chronic impacts from land subsidence, if they disrupt production or shipping activity in these facilities, may cause economic disturbances in the community. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 15 1 Ii” ,n 11111 17111 III III 11111111111 Ul III 1111111 11111'111M III III Wildfire Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Wildfire Hazard 8 City of Agua Dulce Wildfire Hazard 10 City of Bishop Wildfire Hazard 12 City of Corpus Christi Wildfire Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Wildfire Hazard 16 City of Petronila Wildfire Hazard 18 City of Port Aransas Wildfire Hazard 20 City of Robstown Wildfire Hazard 22 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Wildfire Hazard 24 Wildfire Hazard Overview Description A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire almost exclusively fueled by natural vegetative fuels. Fuel may come in the form of grass, brush, or tress. Wildfire risk increases with high concentrations of connected fuels. Meteorological conditions such as high temperatures, low humidity, droughts, and high wind can also increase wildfire risk. Humans are the most common source of initial ignition in wildfires. Sparks from agricultural, industrial, or automobile activity may start a wildfire. Additional information regarding wildfire can be found in the 2011 Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Location Wildfires are most common in areas where wildland and urban areas abut, known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The areas of Nueces County that feature WUI are the most vulnerable to wildfire. The urban centers of communities lack the concentrations of fuels required to feed wildfires. The rural areas of the planning area lack the degree of human activity that is associated with ignition. Areas where human activity takes place and fuel concentrations and connectivity are sufficient to fuel wildfire are the areas where wildfires are most likely. Extent Risk to wildfire can be measured by using the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI). KBDI relates weather conditions and expected, potential fire behavior. KBDI is based upon daily water balance, precipitation, and soil moisture. KBDI ranges from 0 to 800. A KBDI score Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 1 1 If" ,n of 0 indicates no water depletion, while a score of 800 represents absolutely dry conditions. Table 17-1. KBDI scores correspond to potential fire behavior as follows 0 - 200 Soil moisture and large class fuel moistures are high and do not contribute much to fire intensity. Typical of early spring following winter precipitation. 200 — 400 Fuels are beginning to dry and contribute to wildfire intensity. Heavier fuels will still not readily ignite and burn. This is often seen in late spring or early summer. 400 — 600 Lower litter and duff layers contribute to fire intensity and will burn actively. Wildfire intensity begins to increase significantly. Larger fuels could burn or smolder for several days. This is often seen in late summer and early fall. 600 — 800 Often associated with more severe drought with increased wildfire occurrence. Intense, deep -burning fires with extreme intensities can be expected. Live fuels can also be expected to burn actively at these levels Nueces County has an average KBDI of 64. The maximum KBDI experienced by Nueces County is 264. The minimum KBDI experienced by Nueces County is 7. This is a generally low to moderate level of risk. Because KBDI indicates current conditions, care should be taken to ensure that current KBDI is examined to determine risk. Droughts or extreme weather conditions may drive KBDI up or down in a short time. Historically, the largest fires in the planning area (excluding controlled, fuel -management burns) are about 1,000 acres in area. In the future, the worst that is expected to occur in any participating jurisdiction is a fire size of 1,000 acres. Some of the smaller jurisdictions are not much larger than 1,000 acres in total area. It is doubtful that they would ever experience a wildfire that completely encompasses the jurisdiction. However, they could still experience a 1,000 -acre wildfire that crosses jurisdictional boundaries. Extent may also be examined in terms of fire intensity. Table 17-2 provides the Texas Forest Service Fire Intensity Rating. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 2 1 P a Table 17-2 — Texas Forest Service Fire Intensity Rating 1111211IIS.. r.;;, ,��a� ar u. mi Very small, discontinuous flames, usually less than 1 foot in length; very low rate of Very Low spread; no spotting. Fires are typically easy to suppress by firefighters with basic training and nonspecialized equipment. Small flames, usually less than two feet long; small amount of very short range spotting Low possible. Fires are easy to suppress by trained firefighters with protective equipment and specialized tools. Flames up to 8 feet in length; short-range spotting is possible. Trained firefighters will find these fires difficult to suppress without support from aircraft or engines, but dozer and plows are generally effective. Increasing potential for harm or damage to life and property. Large Flames, up to 30 feet in length; short-range spotting common; medium range spotting possible. Direct attack by trained firefighters, engines, and dozers is generally ineffective, indirect attack may be effective. Significant potential for harm or damage to life and property Very large flames up to 150 feet in length; profuse short-range spotting, frequent long range spotting; strong fire -induced winds. Indirect attack marginally effective at the head of the fire. Great potential for harm or damage to life and property. Moderate High Very High For future planning purposes, all jurisdictions can expect to experience a fire of Moderate intensity on the Texas Forest Service Fire Intensity rating. Occurrences Records from the Texas Forest Service (TFS) from January 2005 to November 2015, the range of dates for which spatial wildfire data is provided, Nueces County experienced 25 wildfires greater or equal to 10 acres, 9 wildfires greater or equal to 100 acres, resulting in a total burned area of 6,345 acres. TFS records indicate that fireworks are the most common known cause of fires in Nueces County, causing 12 fires. Smoking, debris burning, and equipment and motor vehicle operation are the next most common causes of fires in Nueces County, each causing ten fires in the ten year period. A plurality of fires have unknown sources of ignition. Records of occurrence for each jurisdiction are provided in the jurisdictional tables. A number of other data sources report a wide range of wildfire occurrences. National Climate Data Center (NCDC) records indicate that three wildfires in Nueces County in 2011 and 2013 had a combined damage total of $260,000. No other damages were reported. Data from the State Fire Marshall indicate that Nueces County experienced 4,105 "outdoor and other" fire events from 2006 — 2010. Online archives of the Corpus Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 31Page Christi Caller Times from 1998 — 2004 indicate that Corpus Christi experienced 13 fires, Nueces County experienced two fires, and Bishop experienced one fire. Due to the wide ranging variability in wildfire data, the data provided by the Texas Forest Service is used to calculate jurisdiction -specific hazard probability. This dataset is the only dataset is the most detailed and therefore most suited for analysis at the municipal level. Table 17-3 Historical Wildfire Occurrences (TFS and NCDC records) * \St \ 1/1/2012 1/3/2012 1/16/2012 2/2/2012 3/28/2012 7/18/2012 7/31/2012 8/26/2012 9/3/2012 9/3/2012 9/10/2012 9/12/2012 9/13/2012 10/12/2012 10/26/2012 11/20/2012 11/24/2012 12/20/2012 2/13/2013 2/25/2013 2/25/2013 2/27/2013 3/4/2013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 5.00 15.00 0.25 10.00 10.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 40.00 0.25 1.00 0.10 0.50 0.10 \\tAt Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Brush pile burning Unknown Cause Power Lines Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Power Lines Power Lines Playing with Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown matches Cause Cause Cause Cause Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 4 1 P a Table 17-3 Historical Wildfire Occurrences (TFS and NCDC records) (cont.)* 3/11/2013 0.10 3/12/2013 0.10 3/24/2013 0.10 3/25/2013 Unspecified 8/5/2013 1.00 8/17/2013 0.25 8/23/2013 0.25 12/14/2013 800.00 1/15/2014 7.00 1/28/2014 0.25 2/14/2014 1.00 2/14/2014 1.00 1/15/2015 1.00 1/21/2015 0.20 2/19/2015 1.00 2/21/2015 0.10 6/15/2015 0.15 7/4/2015 1.00 7/12/2015 1.00 8/3/2015 1.00 8/9/2015 1.00 8/15/2015 1.00 8/30/2015 0.20 8/30/2015 0.50 9/12/2015 0.20 10/1/2015 1.00 11/9/2015 0.10 111 Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause High winds downed power lines Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Warming or cooking Playing with matches Warming or cooking Unknown Cause Fireworks Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Brush pile burning Unknown Cause Power Lines Brush pile burning Unknown Cause 11/21/2015 2.00 Warming or cooking *There are too many wildfire occurrences to list here; additional records from 2005 through 2011 are included as Appendix F Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 5 1 If" a Table 17-4 Historical Occurrences Listed in Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2009) Corpus Christi Fire Department Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Fire Department Nueces County Emergency Services Department 1 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 2 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 3 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 4 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 5 InalanaS 301 91 50 83 29 Port Aransas Fire Department 19 Robstown Fire Department 59 Refinery Terminal Fire Company Total recorded wildfire incidents 632 Probability Hazard probability or reoccurrence intervals are calculated based upon the number of historical events during the period of examination. For example, if four wildfires were to have taken place during a 50 year reporting period, the reoccurrence interval would be about 13 years, or an 8% annual chance of wildfire. Probabilities are shown below in the jurisdictional tables. Impact The impact of wildfire is described in terms of property exposure. Data from the Nueces County Appraisal District and the Texas A&M Forest Service are examined to determine residential and commercial property exposure to high wildfire risk areas. The Texas A&M Forest Service data are described in greater detail in the Vulnerability section. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 6 1 If" ,n Vulnerability Vulnerability and impact to wildfire is discussed in terms of asset exposure to "high" to "very high" wildfire threat. The wildfire threat data comes from the Texas A&M Forest Service and is a unitless index ranging from 1 to 7. The Forest Service assigns the qualitative descriptions of Low, Moderate, High, and Very High to index scores of 1, 3, 5, and 7, respectively. For the purposes of this analysis, assets in areas of wildfire threat index values 5, 6, and 7 are considered to be at risk. Only two of the assets described in Section 4 are located in high wildfire threat areas. The two assets are the Seashore Learning Center Charter School and Fire Station 16, both located in Corpus Christi. It should be noted that the wildfire threat index is a model. Wildfires have taken place outside of areas of high risk. Conversely, there are areas of high risk that have never experienced a wildfire. When interpreting wildfire risk exposure as described by the wildfire threat model, it is important to realize that no model will ever completely capture the variability of the real world. Pastoral and crop lands have the potential to be impacted by wildfire. Crops and pastures can become fuel for wildfires. Wildfires that do not pose a direct threat to human lives or safety can still be damaging due to their impacts on economies dependent upon crop or livestock production. The 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) dataset was used to calculate pasture and crop area by jurisdiction. The 2011 NLCD data, released in 2015, is the most up-to-date data of its type. Pasture and crop area, combined into the term "Agricultural Area," are outlined in the jurisdictional tables. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 7 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Wildfire Hazard \ 1 County Wide (Unincorporated) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 � utratazat01 uwnzzn� t ��� 111111�\ 11\\����11111111111111 1011 .1111111111�111�� 1\11 �� �1��� 11, �� 1 1� 1� 111111�����������������1�1��������� ������\\�1�����������������������,»�����\ Fireworks Smoking 6,345 3,000 Debris Burning tnttt%%%%M\IMZZIM%%%%%% 166 0 deaths, 0 injuries $260,000 ssastuntassal istamannatimissumnamass 1660% annual chance 1 fire every 22 days Ismaststants .................,....s:::::.............%\teumWiriMr itififis�fi�S�S����susa�s»s». n»�,;;s�ia�����fi�'s��S��. issmsztEr 11 0\ 1 11111 111 rixFunklicrayaal 1 \ �11 111 1 wannallettnri1111111 � 1111 �1 ( 1. �\� 111111/111111/1 ��\ \ 01 \10 11\ 0 11 � .� 1 00�\\ �1�� 1������11 1111111 � . �101.1111 \1101 .� `1 „���� 11111�111� 111 \������ � ��`���,�,�)„���11��������� „������,.0 V1���\��11��\�010\����0����\�11��i„i�1��1111�1\��\,1\��1��\�\�11111��,,\\„����11���0��1\�1���\1����1 ���1�`�1�����»��\1\�11��\,��1�1����\1�1��„���1���11�;����15,274 73.77% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 8 1 If” a Figure 17-1. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for Unincorporated Nueces County o111111yh,hll!11N yecwm,, couimy Man At1', n Pl: Fill* IL C11Calgcrriot)cuig Of* and 1F Cvi ft ;I,,wI11111(1OWbi 11"111,7,111"3"., uuuuuipuuuuh Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 9 1 P ,n d' e City of Agua Dulce Wildfire Hazard City Wide 0�1�1�1�1����1����������,�;;;,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �� » i` �� o� �t iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intrmartsii» n ��i� �� �»i�o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �1 1 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Farm Equipment Debris Burning 14 10 tnttt%%%%MIMEMZMSISS IEFEERSINEElgin 2 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 tassastatanssa...........................................................issumnamsss istamannatiam 20% annual chance 1 fire every 5 years sassautass issurnolass, nor/;,d,..issamairtmass.wartmal um= men= TIMMIR s 820 1.12% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 10 1 If” a Figure 17-2. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Agua Dulce III 11'11111 II 11'1'1111111 11111'1 11111'11 1111 1111111111111. '1'1111 111 11111111111111111111111II111111111111'111'1111 111 I II III III 'I (1 V1I I I I1i IiJi ul111111'I I I11101�011io " 11 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 1l 111111111111111111111 111 1 11+I11��I,I 1111 1 X 1111111 11 ,,,,1111111111111.111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIV i "1111 ullll�lu 1111!l,ll6il 11 11'.0„„(EEEEEEffEEEEEEEEE 1111111111111111 1111III111' 111!1 111111111M111rtllm1d�111'�i�:hgP1t1�111�%i11��I I„' �II111 7llllllllll� y11111110 1. m4. �IMoislllliplp 001 00100001 rrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii III u111uu1ui1X11uu111u1u11u11;,1°"VIIiVNillll 11 1Y1i119i11llI! H1�,II11111��,,,,,„„111Il)11111 10X1R1414 004. tAr110f (i 109 Yti i'aWwiniziPY,. Vmec, II 111II111I� IIS 111111111111 i1 °°11plui'�� �T101 p,Ip�;p'll.,lll..ul1lII1�l�1 1111 HI 100111nh 1,14 a+:°:ate A:ti t niy u ,Jua7r 011abanlal Hard IYtint1mc n Ac c n 'akar! 1i P"Rr , 41 d'ta 0trunniOricir- and direMdire TIras't”.crie N 0.1 II1IY,11)111�1liUr1////1�'�i'1�;1 111111'1' 11111,10,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)1 1;uYll Ii I I I,1„J„„„1, lo((�i1i� Ill(ILI l 1II, 1 11 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111 0101 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 11 1 P a d' e City of Bishop Wildfire Hazard 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\�������EME111111�1�\0\0�1�0�1�1�1�������������\����\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\ City Wide �� » i` �� o� �t i iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intalmnsii» n ��i� �� �»i�o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �11 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Smoking — 2 Landscaping Equipment - 1 2.5 2 tllt%%%%%EMZM%%%%% IEFEERSINENEgin 3 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 ilsssatnntasss...................................................isammemmasss istamannatiam 30% annual chance 1 fire every 40 months assastass sacrortzass astmcm nor/;,d,.. s isssmsmtnmssss Istmnis Intram Ittruturnemna 3,150 35.57% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 12 1 If” a Figure 17-3. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Bishop 1N � u11�111�1I Il pVI 0II IIII1I� 11;1111' Nj1I IWMNNINMNI IIJMI (IIIIIIII IIVIIVIAMVIV,IIIIIIIVVIINlVIIVIM 11 11111111111111111011111H" 1V1 � 1�II VIIIIIIIIIIIovvvvvvvvvii �IA,I1� �1pi�1iN';� 11�111i��1I WI�V1Ip1>lf�;Iuuc11www"1l 1� 11 111 IIAAIUPI I N'' I(' 111oI1I�II10 IIIIIIIIIlI''11I 'WII I W�1 11I I�1 W0 VAIII11Il1 �VI Il v�11111 I 11! 1111111111111 1111" Ill 10111 11 loo 111111+ 111111111:1111:1111111111 �II1^111i 11 1 1!1111 J 11111 1 1101 1111111111' Igo 1VLi 11111hIlIII111I 111V1111 00 11111111 111111 u1�t11oo�1l91u 1�II�IIililuiu 11111111,1110 1 Ili u1111II0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 NU�111 �jj11 111111111 ,ry rvww1 11111111111 II uYaI111p 1 7'11111111700011111111111111111111 pl IVji 1�uu i1gI 11 11�1 1'MN'IlNhW NN'1'ml 1m''1m'1N'1111N11 11111111111111701 k Yh0nnlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll111111 I�1IIIIIII111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII nIIIIIIIII 111 M 1111111 III ��� �� IIII VIII '11l II III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 1 I llll�i'lil II III 111111 I111I luuuuuum IIII ^ uuuuuuuuuuuu11111111°°°1111 1111 „,IIII �I1 11. N1 111111 111111.11uI�11u. u111_ 11111 01 11,11111111111111111111111111111111111111 071101101011101111110r, 01111111,110 01! 1 001111111 111111 1 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 m o111u '11 ii 111111117111-1 111 00101010100 11uii�IIW�WII�I�I��ll�1111 "II I� ' II iI eu1igiuli000”' �ry 1111111 11 I)JIIIt1U1vvvvoovc 1010101010101001010101010101010000000001000000000000000000000000000100000010000000000001010101111 41414114141414410110141414141444141414141414141111111111114141111 111144444404 1111111111111111111111111111111111 1ihl ��I'�IIiU�MINIIII�`11u11VN1,lUl�I)111 . 1nurtv.11Arv:a. rHrM9'A CN.klwfn7e,1 Nub ' FYuo wx 1 N1' �IIIIIIIIIIIIIgl1111111'IIIII�I��I�II Ile11 1111 �� "III����lu;l1 tvkvecea C uaaIrit ,^ 1;pr'a�d ��'A,a,'u1Atix° diiti ationAc ion n re''r �.�1:�C: il'{'ajr�!lipuvri,pAAFEN! �:m1,IC Vu'i1 dire TU'" amt Po m1 e;. , 111111111 �11 uuNulNelt�IU�v', JINIINNISNN NI N11111 ,. 017.1111111111117771 11111,11,11,111 1111 dIIdJ 1)11111 ilwwrvwlwlllll111111111117111111111 111,111,111,111,111,111 w."M'AN'MI'n8�II1YIIrvm"jll�'IIII�i�l��1''�IVllo�luj'il�l��� 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000„001110 10101010101010101010101010101010101101010101010101010101010101001010101010101010100100101010101010110101010101100 Nm1111111Irv1Imm111rv1ImmrlrlrlrlrlrlrinnnnmmllrvlImmllmmlmollrvlIm11Nu l Y .71mr 7114INNT 1 107107.70.70,7 0117 17707 IMa� 7 1 �� 0077 W'„ryRm 1111 1111 NIIH°I,;'I Il 11 I �1 VIII III' n IIIIIIII II W 1� IIIIIIII X1,11 I" h N 111 y 11 pp 5S 11 �o I�IIIII�IOIIIIIIIIIIIII uuuuul8l�l�l���p ' 1111111 y�,,IIryry 0I0VvII u6116W V� yp ppryry 11V ' 011iIP u I I1i111�11�111111111111111111111111IuMIwie ( ((. 1i pN1iII111111111111111111111111111u U10100NI1111pXXhIuuIIIIII n1bYiy1. h„dul 11111111111111111111111111111 01010010100001010101000010101010000000000000000000000000000 1101111111111111111111111111711111111111110 11111111111001.00 1111 0010111 16, 1 0011100 70 1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 III 44 :44 4 4:: 4444440Illool010 1111111111111111 0101010010101010101010101111 1111111111111111111111111111111 11111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,„„ 1111111111111111111 1M11 M1 oI111uo11I11m1111 111111 111111111111111111111111171 u,1u11lu11u11u11u11u11u m1 11®11®1' I (IIII 1 11111111110 I loo,00o 11oo 1 Iw1111 1 11111111111111111uu1111u11u1 y1„ ' 111 I1IWWA111 1 I' 011 IIII 11 II111 1 lmNl 1 .... )IV 11111 11IIIIIII ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111 110 1 1 11 1111 111 701 11olool000moolloo1111 1111111111111111111 MN�uNM�MMIIMI 1m11N111wvvvvwulum 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIII Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 13 1 IP a ,11' ov11' City of Corpus Christi Wildfire Hazard City Wide u a� 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\���������,;;;;������»��,�;;;,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� , 00101 000 11 0\ 1\ \ 1 1��111 ��11110�� �1���1 ������ 111 11111 1011111 � 11 11111 1 10111 1 1 111 �1 1 1. ��������,,�»�„»»�i�»»�,�,»�,»��,»a„�»�»��,��,»a»����i���0�01��� ������������0�����y1�����1���������������������������‘11i164\1\1 Power Lines Children Playing with Matches 6,323 Other Incendiaries 1,000 IIIIIS%%%lttM%%%%%% 11111EMSIZEIFFEnitlarntal 182 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 nssssmm\\wnmnsss swermoranzasnmatinammals, 1820% annual chance 1 fire every 20 days St%%%%%%ZS%%%%% latallnirraniall=arrnal..........:........................ $124,962,516 $106,530,505 tsss\smdcnsss. stamsImmur tinatmarzumum 324,074 7.64% 12.44 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 14 1 If” a Figure 17-4. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Corpus Christi 416,1 eamellfitla 11111111111111111111111 1111111I tb i1VINWlIu 1111111111111 mYufruYYffllhl(IIIII�)! Newn,arm., kne. 1 A tY P R P'AIlecas, Ce my s,uY1u Yu,arr.^•tl,�o �, iaaP' Y*.t.int don Ran I 0dOwn; 9 . v. ,m�una Tarig,f1111. 11113 11111111111111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 15 1 P ,n d' e City of Driscoll Wildfire Hazard 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\�������EME111111�1�\0\0�1�0�1�1�1�������������\����\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\ City Wide 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\�����������»��,�;;;,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\������� u a� �� » i` �� o� �t iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intrzmanii» n ��i� �� �»i� o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �1 1 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Smoking 1 1 IIISS%%%%11M11%%%%%% IEEEERSINEElgin i 1 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 Itntntlt%%% Intalr2211121MISSUMEMIMInal 10% annual chance 1 fire every 10 years stanstalssa astatormantasu astErnan max so so 111121111111121111113� 752 62.4% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 16 1 If” a Figure 17-5. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Driscoll Tonle 010.04 0001011111111 11001110 1111 111Q11 1uYI11 QNB 111'1001 (9III9111ult!I'181 V 1111111111 IyN��VV 01010011iiiIIIIIIIIII111110111111111, 0000 Jo 0101010101010101010111111101 »)0 H16 1111111111111111 11111 11 001..0 11 11 � IW�IIII 'l1 l I „ 1111111 pY ' 11 lu ql pp VWI II 1, , 111111111111111 11,100, , 1 ',I) 11 111111111H 4 111111111111111 1111111 1000111100001 000010,11110111110,0000,1011,11111101111000,0000000000,......." I� ptl 00 °ll 1i 111 �lmil 11110011010 0000111000000 44100000000000000000000000100000000010000 Iil ulIjIIIII IIII Ili', p1 11111111011 II11111111u,11,111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111a1 1111111111111100t000, 100000000000000000010010111°1111111111111111,11111111110111lI 1I l,' l " Billi10111110..0011itttttflttttttttttttttttttttttttttl II 4I�II�Ut�111rI1r1l�p,, . ipII1111111111�1PI11111111111111111111111111111g l'1°°"°°'°1111111!'1011'1011'1011'1011!!li1!11111111111111011:11:1111111W1°'°,1 011111111111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11110.0.11.1.01111 fl \IIII11:11 IIIIIIII111111110 1111111111111011111111111111 i Val „II I III"III 11111ll1111llllllllllllllllllllhl° /00 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110 l 111111111111 11111111111111,1111, u 11111111 a 111111114�1dlldll Ai° 10I111!'1 i111111 �, IIII IIII I I,jilp 11 (III (IIII I (111111111 111111111 i y,11 I11111111111 1111111111 lulNll0000lo� llo°ron 1li000 01 h 111 1111111IIIIllillllllllllllll .111111 I® 111q 11111111'1 1111111111111111111111111 0,11,11,,,l'1,0,0,101:0000,1,00,111',00101'0010001'001'11 yy 010 III 11111111 ����� 1111 i 1 un11111111111111111011111111 111,1101 illUr G'',4b4:k SYTNII, A1'^1idMf# 1 Ncwwpaart. Ilmrc-. ii.00e es 01,1rtuni0e M0,ffl 0.10.1-04110.,0414f 111110,40.00046" AIa:'N° a nA0:10evYY ?tar 1111 I 1111 000000 w 0000.0.00 1111001111 0111 ,111111011 11111111111111 1 11 11110111111111 001 110,00,0000,00„ 1111111110 u, .111‘ 1111111" 0d0 1211 An\ a\ 'n Kr; 11,11,10,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,111,111111111111111111111111111111111,1,11111111111111111 11111111111,11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111), 11111111111111111111111 1111111011111111111111111001011. 10000 „0,1,010111 11uuuumm111111111111111rrrq�� 111,11 000,1 00010,100110000011111111111111111111111111.11.1111111111111111111101110110«000000«000000«0000«0 w 03 win "=0M"0 LEK„EttCr'7Ai''engifdc and Maim T malt 1711,1C"4 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 17III'a.1m' City of Petronila Wildfire Hazard 0�1�1�1�1����1�������1„�,��»,�„�,�MIE17111111�1�\0\0�1�0�1�1�1�������������\����\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\ City Wide 0�1�1�1�1����1���r,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �� » i` �� o� �t iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intnirmisii» n ��i� ���»i� o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �1 1 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Unknown .75 .5 Construction Debris Burning tllt%%%%%EMZM%%%%% IEEEERSINEElgin 2 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 tassastatanssa...........................................................issumrmmzasss istamannatim 20% annual chance 1 fire every 5 years assastass sacrortzass astmcm nor/;,d,.. s iss smtnmssss iumittautztur3 tnntrantanza 114 79.36% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 18 1 If” a Figure 17-6. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Petronila 111VI111V4tIVIV11 '111111111111111 11111 iflit IN1nwll UIY I� VIW lr�vlwlou, ,nl fq 1..11111111111IalaN1 11111111 1.414 11111111111111111111111111111111 rffamisd 1111111111111111111111111111h 111111111111111111" AU „di 11111111111111 g1NV 1 ' 1rNIY° ��I�1�1111�tl �WI,� IYrt>i,`iYi/I t0V4,p IY � +14u1U4 i, UT �V � ttAlAe�e I I� I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II 1101)1,1,1,1,1,(1,11 11 11 1 1111101���IV4�' lllllllllllll1111'IIIII1Illllllllllml 11111111.11,111111 01111111111111111111111111110111 1)11 11111) 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 ion FHM X1111711111 I'' VV uVNVVH �I��IVV v' �rlti �I IIIA ld� � � 11 IVl �rn�!hlVl�V� vrlo ,,. W I llllfVrrru�ul i; olioolvb 1f!NI11 l0001111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111”. 1111 11111111 1111111111 L,t)citmood. Alronr.e'I 114'd�Ya weunrt9,. Ilrtrvr_^. Niue:es. C' ;n'bk" 1iti,gat [wln Acton ,Plan~ ¢' s? Loc;ata nuwO ng'lw,m and Tho rat 1770et. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 19 I P City of Port Aransas Wildfire Hazard y 1 4 City Wide v , \ 0\1\1�1�1��1�1�1�1������\�\���\�\\\����,�,;�;;����,�i��,�;;�,�„1���,���„��111�11001�1�11�\�`�1�`��`������\��\\�\\\�������������������������������������������������\\\ t �� u u v n� � 11,11111 0�1\1 11101��a�,1\111� .1`111�111�� �1111�1�111�� 11\\����1�1111� 1111 111\ � 1111�11 1 �1��1111`��111y — 3 Power Lines -1 Unknown -1 55 30 ISSISSIMICESSMS 11171711\I 11101111 5 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 nms\ss s\ummzrotznnslisautumnsas 50% annual chance 1 fire every 2 years SIIS%%%%t111%%%% 1111111110111111SSI ............. $1,96,921,937 $42,651,525 inns .s\tt toms% .1.% SIZEIMIS 1121111113 11111111113 121111111311 3,955 0% 2.92 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 20 1 IP ,n Figure 17-7. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Port Aransas 11111111,1,11,111111 Y NXI„ utte r# 0-.„Akrtr uv tlib naffit ^MU, Mitigation Acton, F . 4)41 Louzettyiet,reintb206, and NiffirelnrBat kR ?r 0 ' rit' :::4f' Mm Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 21 1 P a City of Robstown Wildfire Hazard 4 4�� City Wide Nallant Mat 1111111 TIMM Unknown - 51 fires Fireworks -1 fire Farm Equipment-lfire Debris Burning -1 fire 1.1.1SISSEREEISISS 70 60 stEgyaly wa smitto 54 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 SSSSSErZMISS SIZMAEZMEMEISCSSSZMMIIMSSS 540% annual chance 1 fire every 68 days ISSISSISMITIE Marl ZEIM ISSISS\ 11\”%rwormlimmillssx IsrlistwIt %will ,,,,, , I liii ,,, li,l „iii,,,l ,»�„ , „»�„II , � III ,,, „ „ , u ., lu III AI �S) ,. `. ,����� ,. � r ., ,. ,. AI n.. ,. Ail ,.. 4tt ,. AI n.. ”` � `1`111 � 11 I 1 m � I 1, 1 1,pp �1 11 � � �» l l 11 � �) , o ���������������,�����1���������������� ������������ �1 ill,,.���o�������� �������������I�l„�,�,»»l»»»�,»������������� �����������li»�,,,a�a�1,�a,�l,����� 11,576 66.32% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 22 1 If” ,n 11 Figure 17-8. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Robstown u1 II,I loam IVxVgll, `l..11.11111111,111,1,11111,11,1111111111.11.111111111111111111'11111MI1111 full pill 1 ,uulwwioYrllUlllllllf�) i11111 �VlY1� I�'iVl�nlllfi III1 1ILW'9 1 111;11141(v.; 114 1111 111101 11,11,1, vlulivv 'm " aw11v; 1101. 11111111111111111111 41,111,1 1010 ! ,,I, Lai 1111111111111111,11( Baum Na„,,,114100110111 V11 aNla vummi 11/ t®I avvvvv I11 1 a 11 I®1 mu11111 �uI Ilr; 001 1111111 I 01010 111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111 1 1111 ,;14401111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 ocarwood,, Arlorewer It ll16 W i1%idP% NC,. 11 11111111111„,; at vvvv 1111 u vi;lllll MIIII6IA'A111111111111111111 arta 1(1 M Oa/ ..d"aeai ayilaall rrod f1az:mrra azlilag,stion Action %alkan rare lv...cicaRtensv voDakcillavaa and It rs°at, aravavaaava. im.,,r.'I,wae1 f.'lu .Ae,„nww.wuur „„ r uu 1YuuluuulllY Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 23 1 P Port of Corpus Christi Authority Wildfire Hazard a. 4�� 1 Jurisdiction Wide ���1�0��1��0�0�1�1�1���������������,���,,I������\�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� I 001 ` 1 01 11 111 111 010 1 1 19 11111 010 1 11 tmaxtrimm1111 Illllll l 010 110 1111\ �01 �1 11� 1��1� ��1�1�� �� � ��1� ^ ���1�1�. � .�����1������� �1��1�1��1 ��1 � 1 ���������`���� ��1�1�� . �1 ��1 �IQ� .`������ "�������������^x 1 111�1� �1� � (�� 1�1��)11� � 1�1�1�� 1 ����"����� 1�) ^� �1�� � 1 „� ��1) 11���������Iuu, N �� to ��, ��,,. N I II qil,N AI. ,. n. �� � „����. Ott � tu. ,����, ,. ., ����, � �Vi � ..., �, ,��� � tu. ��, ,. ., ,����,��`��1����`I���1�������1�1����1������„;;���������1�1���1�������������`���`��`��1������1��11�1�������111��`����i1��1���1������11�����,;;,������������11�����������������,,;;;���1������1�`����������1��1����,,,,�1�� Various Welding equipment Landscaping equipment 225 100 ssssssamnsass SIBEENVERITISIMIll 4 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 SSSSSSEZMSSSSS IVZMITZMEIMEISISSSVMMMIIMSSS 40% annual chance 1 fire every 2.5 years SSSSSSSW=1NZM2MMZSSS��S��������������� 111 1 1111 1111 ,11 111111 11111 1 �1 11 11 0� 1� 11 1 D 11 11 �1�111 �/01111/11 1 �1�111 so so 111,1\\"1‘1•117\ Ivaranma $ itninntimit Industrial Area; No Residents; Staff & Visitors Only 7.64% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 24 1 If" a Figur 17-9. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for Port of Corpus Christi Authority }\ ) 1010010loololiolo,1,11,11h400rifiooloo / I : efs R � g htt m \ � K ,. ing 11110c oiA:rAto, An P n a % 4n , viouddlele t! NAV Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action PIan — Section 17 251 Paye iir 51 tt �i i i lMiiil i �� iillllli uuu Yu o`li mull i Severe Winter Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Severe Winter Storms Hazard 7 City of Agua Dulce Severe Winter Storms Hazard 8 City of Bishop Severe Winter Storms Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Severe Winter Storms Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Severe Winter Storms Hazard 11 City of Petronila Severe Winter Storms Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Severe Winter Storms Hazard 13 City of Robstown Severe Winter Storms Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Severe Winter Storms Hazard 15 Severe Winter Storms Hazard Overview Description A severe winter storm event is defined as a storm with snow, ice, or freezing rain. Severe winter storms are rare for the Texas Coastal area. Sever winter storms may include snowstorms, blizzards, cold waves and ice storms. Snowstorms include four or more inches of snow in a 12 -hour period. Blizzards are characterized by low temperatures and strong winds in excess of 35 mph with large amounts of drifting snow. A cold wave is a winter cold front with a drastic drop in temperature. An ice storm occurs when rain falls out of the warm and moist upper layers of the atmosphere into a cold and dry layer near the ground.1 Location Winter storms vary in location, intensity and duration but are considered rare occurrences in Nueces County and participating jurisdictions. It is assumed that all of the jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to winter storm events; therefore, all areas of the county are equally exposed. 1 State of Texas Mitigation Plan Update 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 1 1 li" ,n S Extent Table 18-1 below displays the magnitude of severe winter storms. The wind-chill factor is further described in Figure 18-1. This is an index developed by the National Weather Service, although the chart is not applicable when temperatures are over 50° or winds are calm. Table 18-1. Extent Scale - Winter Weather Alerts 010000 0000000011 1,1 Ilul�u I 11 N111111 1 111 111111(1 100 000000100 00110 0 III 1 I 1 I 11 II 11 ill Pril (111 iiil 1 1 1111111 1111 �1. s 11111111111111111( 1111111111111111111111, 011 I 11111 111111 I loom I This alert may be issued for a variety of severe conditions. Weather advisories may be announced for snow, blowing or drifting snow, freezing drizzle, freezing rain, ora combination of weather events. Severe winter weather conditions may affect your area (freezing rain, sleet or heavy snow may occur separately or in combination). Severe winter weather conditions are imminent. Rain or drizzle is likely to freeze upon impact, resulting in a coating of ice glaze on roads and all other exposed objects. Small particles of ice usually mixed with rain. If enough sleet accumulates on the ground, it makes travel hazardous. Sustained wind speeds of at least 35 mph are accompanied by considerable falling or blowing snow. This alert is the most perilous winter storm with visibility dangerously restricted. Below freezing temperatures are expected and may cause significant damage to plants, crops and fruit trees. A strong wind combined with a temperature slightly below freezing can have the same chilling effect as a temperature nearly 50 degrees lower in a calm atmosphere. The combined cooling power of the wind and temperature on exposed flesh is called the wind—chill factor. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 2 1 P a Table 18-2 Historical Extents* Unincorporated Nueces County Agua Dulce Bishop Corpus Christi Driscoll Petronila Port Aransas Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority 1)11\131,),,\ 12° 15°* 19° 13° 15°* 15°* 15°* 14° 15°* AttAIAI 0" Unreported 4" 4.4" Unreported Unreported Unreported 5.1" Unreported *Records are limited by the presence of a National Weather Service weather station within the jurisdiction. Marked records are interpolated estimates. Wind chill temperature is a measure of how cold the wind makes real air temperature feel to the human body, similar to the heat index for extreme heat (Figure 18-2). Since wind can dramatically accelerate heat loss from the body, a blustery 30° day would feel just as cold as a calm day with 0° temperatures. The Coast Bend Region has never experienced a blizzard, but based on previous occurrences, Coastal Bend counties have been subject to winter storm watches, warnings, freezing rain, sleet, snow and wind chill. Based upon historical data, the worst that can be expected in the future in the planning area is six inches of snow and 10° Fahrenheit. Wind chill factors would further lower the apparent temperature, potentially as low as -19 degrees. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 3 1 Ii" ,n Table 18-3. Wind Chill Chart2 5 10 1 20 25 E 30 35 40 45 50 55 6 Temperature [°°F) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -3. 34 27 32 25 30 24 29 28 22 28 21 27 20 26 2 26 25 25 Frostbite Times -40 -45 it i mni,iiiiiimill1111111111:1117111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 1 ,17 7%�rt 1411:11'1'1111111111111 111111 1111 001 1111111110000 101VIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVU1 VIOV111111111°''' 11111,01iiii:1:1:!i;55111111111111. - 1 .:1111111111111111114311911:iii1111111511111111311111111111:I t � os -a::"66: --6792 " -. 776 3 —.9826 ' 9111111111461 111 --F1 0000s 1110 1101001opoo 000l000l000...."""11111111,,,11111 11 mt111111,„. 111111111:.54 - ,_62- -6 -84 -311 -98 -61 " -82 -89 -97J.. '11111341"'"410111i- 36 , 36 11111111111111 IN MI ac minutes 10 minue, 5 minutes s Wind Chill {OF) = 3534 + 0.6215T 3535(V.16) ".16) + 0.4275T Where T= Air Temperature (F V= Wind Speed (mph) Eft'rieriet Occurrences Sever winter storm events in Nueces County are rare. January is the month when snow, sleet or freezing rain is most likely to be observed; yet, winter weather conditions can occur at any time during the winter and early spring months. Table 18-3 shows historical occurrences for the area since 1950 as well as the type of event and the amount of damage provided by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Although there have been relatively few storms, it is likely that a number of occurrences have gone unreported. Additionally, historical winter storm information, as provided by the NCDC, shows winter storm activity across a multi -county forecast area for each event. In some instances within the Coastal Bend study area, a single record could consist of up to 12 counties. Therefore, an appropriate percentage of the total property and crop damage reported for the entire forecast area has been allocated to each participating county impacted by each event. 2 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 18 4 1 P a Table 18-4. Historical Winter Storm Events by Jurisdiction (NCDC, 1950-2016) Nueces County Nueces County Nueces County Nueces County TOTALSi1 JIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIIII III 11111 I�IIII I IIII1111I HI 10 HI 11111111 01 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 1 1 Winter Weather Frost/Freeze Ice Storm Snow Storm 0 0 0 1111111 111111 6����u I il�lgp 0 Negligible 0 Negligible 0 Negligible 0 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Probability Hazard probability or reoccurrence intervals are calculated based upon the number of historical events during the period of examination. For example, if five winter Storms were to have taken place during a 66 year reporting period, the reoccurrence interval would be about 13 years, or a 7.5% annual chance of a winter storm. Because it is likely that more winter storms have occurred than are reported in the NCDC, the probability for winter storms occurring along the Coastal Bend Region is occasional, meaning an event is possible in the next five years. Impact Winter storms are associated with freezing or frozen precipitation such as freezing rain, sleet, snow and the combined effects of winter precipitation and strong winds. Wind chill is a function of temperature and wind. Low wind chill is a product of high winds and freezing temperatures. The leading cause of death during winter storms is transportation accidents. Hypothermia and frostbite are other dangers from very cold winter temperatures. Historical evidence shows that most of the area has a low risk of winter storm activity; however, past reported property damages indicate that, while winter events (typically consisting of snow and ice) do occur, their economic impacts are typically not severe across the entire study area. All buildings and facilities are considered to be exposed to this hazard and could potentially be impacted because it cannot be predicted where a winter storm event may cause damage or disruption. The agricultural industry in the Coast Bend Area is not usually effected by winter storms as crops are not usually planted during the winter months. Vulnerability Table 18-4 shows potential annualized property losses for each jurisdiction based on past reports of property and crop damages in each jurisdiction (NCDC, 1950-2016) and exposure values. "Negligible" indicates that the annualized expected property losses are less than $5,000. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 5 1 If" ,n Table 18-5. Potential Annualized Losses by Jurisdiction (Severe Winter Storm) 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Nueces County Agua Dulce Bishop Corpus Christi Driscoll Petronila Port Aransas Robstown Port of Corpus Christi "" 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 $860,464,240 $38,252,604 $215,262,986 $17,246,489,193 $38,757,328 $6,915,934 $1,189,078, $334,835,963 $174,026,681 OTALS. FOR STUDY AREA $20,104,083,700 A Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible 111111111111 dllliiuuf 11111 1111111111111 ul 1"u1fuuu11110 J 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% *Totals for the study area may include values less than $5,000 for dollar amounts that are classified as "Negligible "in the table. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 6 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Severe Winter Storms Hazard 1 4 County Wide (Unincorporated ISSIMIwzmittlann%\xml tkit 11171111"111111111111111111111111111111111 5 1 2 1 1 lst\Asssllmvtc7%,m\\...................:.................................................................... "I Nuv\\,. Imm!).1 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS hr's v<'%'�'' rGa11A1 NA Vk.t.V ‘.\Atit 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ISS%%%%1111%IS%.%\. VAN 15,274 $373,034,606 $487,429,634 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 312,735 $50,663,070 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 7 1 P a City of Agua Dulce Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSIZIMSSSSS\ City Wide ISS%%%%MMISS% SSSSSSWZEIIMIMMIISSSSSIM 1111111 11121111 111 an SICESS 5 1 2 1 1 IssssmssmillatINI\sss IF" xkI� AAA 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS AVUI\s ;dam a„d 11,‘. naV 5 0 0 ISSSSS. I\\\\\\11 11111 \ Wit \ IMRE Intlant ISSIMMISSI 11111111 SUM SUM Negligible Negligible 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 3 $486 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 8 1 If” a City of Bishop Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSZEI\SMSSS City Wide tlyntErIMEMINIMINISIESS 5 1 2 1 1 tsAssssssmslmmtws\\ IF ” xl‘Ai% 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENTESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 SSSSSLRSSS VMS\ Vk\k‘A Alt% 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible assistEnsas Nisstnrzassussmratsw unintutramsommant 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 539 $87,318 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 9 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSttan\SSSS City Wide ISISSSSMSSSSS ISSSSSSWZMMEEISSSS tlyntE TIMEM11111= Wan 5 1 2 1 1 lsslss\212\\‘\msl\ IF" tv- xk��.� 41% 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 SSSSSLRSSS VMS\ V&A A. Alt% 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ssssamctnssss \ *Iv ssamninas astrarassu unint utramisonant 324,074 $7,007,832,685 $10,238,656,508 24,632 $3,990,384 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 10 1 If” a City of Driscoll Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSIZMSS\SSS City Wide SSS%S.S.1111SSS.S.S ISSISSIMIZERVICISSISSIM1111111 11111111 "r1 1111 111111111 5 1 2 1 1 ISSASSS1112711\‘M\\Sxk a 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS %MS\ V&A A\ Alt% 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible t\N, \\* ISSIntrilant Inarnntatal 11•1311111111111 1111•11 SUM 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 465 $75,330 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 11 1 If" a City of Petronila Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSttan\SSSS City Wide ISISSSSMSSSSS ISSSSSSWZMMEEISSSS tlyntE TIMEM11111= Wan 5 1 2 1 1 lsslss\212\\‘\msl\ IF" tv- xk��.� 41% 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 SSSSSLRSSS VMS\ V&A A. Alt% 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ssssamctnssss \ *Iv ssamninas astrarassu unint utramisonant 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 927 $150,174 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 12 1 If” a City of Port Aransas Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSI City Wide ISSSSSSMMIMMIEMSSSS tlyntE TIMEM11111= Wan 5 1 2 1 1 11111 .ateU.n).1ry xr�%�\AAA 1 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS %WM ttv ,,,,, , es,sS�S>asiS�i%� Yr, 5 0 0 SSSSS1=ZnS Negligible Negligible \AA Nissxrrnrtassssswnmassv uninturnnumalartat 3,995 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 0 $0 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 13 1 If" a City of Robstown Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSMR\SSSS City Wide SSSSSSMMMITMMIRSSSSSS. Wan Mann Irranl SNIMS 5 1 2 1 1 iltru ‘sulu zwAlv "ncnwt: 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 ISSSSSSVZSSSSSS........................................................... 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ISSSSS\E=tn\SSS A\\ WISSIEMMEISSASSMINISSI ,,,avert ) 11,576 $151,390,423 $183,445,540 6580 $1,065,960 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 14 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Severe Winter Storms Hazard ISISSISS.72211111.1SSI sssssssttnsss\ slassammazzantalsam 5 1 2 1 1 )1\.1117,;} 1•11:11\f' S\1\ul\t ‘.%\ \\\ 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS ISSSISSMSSS%% ' -�� � ctV� s �i i X00/% ,,,, � ANAM 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible lsssssstmnnssss...............istammang ...........................................................um% urn Ism swat issinnists N/A $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 15 1 P a ,, �inmmmmi 1 R f uu (11uu11111m �i a �/ Mitigation Strategy 1 All Participating Jurisdictions Mitigation Actions 4 Unincorporated Nueces County Mitigation Actions 6 City of Agua Dulce Mitigation Actions 50 City of Bishop Mitigation Actions 68 City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 89 City of Driscoll Mitigation Actions 141 City of Petronila Mitigation Actions 162 City of Port Aransas Mitigation Actions 182 City of Robstown Mitigation Actions 201 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Mitigation Actions 247 Mitigation Strategy The Planning Team reviewed the goals and objectives from the 2012 Coastal Bend Mitigation Action Plan. Mitigation actions, new and old, are prioritized to reflect overall mitigation strategy, which is to reduce and eliminate the long-term risk of loss of life and property damage from the full range of disasters affecting the planning area. Each mitigation action is presented by jurisdiction in the section below. Each mitigation action included is in priority order (high, moderate, low), by best estimate of cost, if applicable, by potential funding source and identify which department or agency will administer the action and the action timeline. Each jurisdiction has multiple authorities to implement the mitigation strategy. Authority includes, but is not limited to, local planning and zoning, public works efforts, emergency management, tax authority, annual operation budgets, building codes and ordinances. As detailed in Section 6 of the report, the participating jurisdictions, with the exception of Petronila, participate in the NFIP. The City of Petronila does not participate in the NFIP because the city's jurisdiction is primarily limited to the ROW limits within the town center; the surrounding developed and agricultural parcels are part of the county. General hazard mitigation goals for the participating jurisdictions are defined below. The participating communities used very similar methods for ranking their mitigation actions. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority scored each action with a 1-5 score for the following criteria: Life & Safety, Property Protection, Technical Feasibility, Political Feasibility, Legality, Environmental Impacts, Social Impacts, Administrative Feasibility, the presence of a Local Champion for the action, and finally if the action supported other Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 1 1 If" ,n community objectives. A raw score was added for the ten criteria and was used to rank the actions. Unincorporated Nueces County and the Cities of Bishop, Driscoll, Petronila, and Agua Dulce used the same method but rated low or no cost actions higher due to the ease of implementation. The City of Corpus Christi used three primary factors to rank actions: benefits to public safety, cost, and economic impact. Goal 1 Protect public health and safety Object ive 1.1 Implement mitigation actions that will assist in protecting lives and property by making homes, businesses, public facilities, and infrastructure more resistant to high-risk hazards. 0I:d' edive .2 Maximize the utilization of the latest technology to provide adequate warning, communication, and mitigation of hazard events. Object d:live 1.3 Reduce the danger to, and enhance protection of, high risk areas during hazard events. Object ive 1.4 Ensure that public and private facilities and infrastructure meet established building codes and enforce the codes to address any deficiencies. Goal 2 Protect new and existing properties. �:' ' d d:liv��: .1 .� It`d. Reduce repetitive losses to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). �:'It`d. 'ed d:live 2.2 .� Use the most cost-effective approach to protect existing buildings and public infrastructure from hazards. 0O'ed; d:live 2.3 Review existing ordinances, building codes, and safety procedures and enforce regulatory measures to ensure they protect lives and property. Goal 3 Build and support partnerships to enhance mitigation to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. C Build and support local partnerships to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. 0Ibped; d:live 3.2 Build a cadre of committed volunteers to safeguard the community before, during, and after a disaster. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 2 1 P a „.. Ea'C.1JIve: 3.; Build hazard mitigation concerns into planning and budgeting processes. Goal 4 Leverage outside funds for investment in hazard mitigation. Objective 4.1 Maximize the use of outside sources of funding to help communities with local match requirements for implementing hazard mitigation actions to reduce risk. Objective 4.2 Maximize participation of property owners in protecting their properties. Ir`n. ( jE Q;taivE .' � Maximize insurance coverage to provide financial protection against hazard events. Object ect ive . Prioritize mitigation projects based on cost-effectiveness, starting with those sites facing the greatest threat to life, health and property. Goal 5 Increase the understanding of residents for the need for mitigation, and steps they can take to protect people and properties. Objective 5.1 Heighten public awareness of the full range of natural and man-made hazards they face. Objective tJive Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all hazards. Objective ., Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation measures. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 3 1 P a City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 1111ii1i[ �uNuuq�i'pI�I��V�N��YNYVh Proposed Action 1111,11.11,1;111,11;1);11,11,11.00111,Ifilif)fii.)1):11,11.,,,ir 1011 11111111"11 "1'7' 1111111111,11111,,11111111111111111. 1111111111111111..1!..,111,....1.1111.111....! 11,1,11111111 11111111111111111110 111, 1111111111.111 Seawall Capital Improvement Projects for routine maintenance and restoration. .ACI INFORI Site and Location: Sewall in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Providing routine repairs help to defer major structural reconstruction efforts Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACt ION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of maintaining and restoring the seawall in Corpus Christi will protect existing buildings along the seawall and any new buildings being built from Hurricanes and Tropical Storms and Floods. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: CIP Project Funding and a sales tax adjustment Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-10 Years NC( RP( RATION INT' PLANS AND PFtOCEDURE � Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 89 1 If" ,n .,111111111 �nn�doiu��1111.1 11111111111111111111 Proposed Action Construction of a new bulkhead in Corpus Christi Bay along the south side shoreline of Corpus Christi. A INFORMAL Site and Location: South Side Shoreline in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Construct a new bulkhead along the south shoreline of the Science and History Museum eastward across the United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) property terminating at the northwest corner of the recently constructed bulkhead in front of the South Texas Art Museum. The low-lying areas on the USACE property and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority would be filled to an elevation approximately the same as that in front of the Art Museum. Area paving could be constructed between the new bulkhead and existing floodwall. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Deter coastal erosion and mitigation potential flooding of existing properties situation at the northern section of downtown Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $10,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Sales Tax Proceeds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 90 1 If" ,n Implementation Schedule: 4-10 Years INC RP( RATION INTO EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 91 1Page II q)010luyuAtl0,) '1,1Vntly1111111JIVNNNN�N '11h��NflIflIIVNI 1111 III 1111111111111111 vIIIII )) Proposed Action 11000000 o0000110)111 Make improvements to the Salt Flat Levee System. 1NFOI MA' Site and Location: Salt Flat Levee System in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Salt Flat Levee System is an integral component of the downtown flood protection system. The levee requires improvements and continued maintenance to ensure that the system will function as originally designed. Additional studies are underway and improvements are planned that would be sufficient to be certified by FEMA as a freeboard deficient reach. This means that although the system would not afford the level of protection required to prevent overtopping in a 100 -year event, it would not be vulnerable to a catastrophic failure. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: Improvements on the Salt Flat Levee system will help mitigate flooding of existing buildings situated in downtown Corpus Christi. Failure to achieve FEMA certification would greatly impact the City of Corpus Christi and downtown business insurance costs. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCO RPO I EXI 11N( NS ANDPFOCE Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 92 1 If" ,n Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 93 1Page u��'hh�pwwu�olltnVII'V ill 111,1,11;11..0111111 111 iy°111N��1�"pC! 11111111111111111 Proposed Action Make improvements to Power Street Pump Station. INFO ;NIA Site and Location: Power Street Pump Station in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Power Street pump station was originally constructed in 1947 as part of the bay front protection. It has 3 pumps with diesel powered motors. The Kinney Street pump station was also constructed in 1947. The pump station was reconstructed in 2009. It has 5 pumps with electric motors that are dependent on the 3 generators inside. One redundant pump is located on site. The downtown flood protection system relies on these two pump stations to remove all water from the area during a significant storm event. Preliminary studies have indicated that the pumping capacity would not be adequate to handle rainfall, inflow and wave overtopping during a 100 -year storm event. Planned 2D modeling will help to better define the demands that would be placed on the system during significant storm events. This project would enhance the reliability and capacity of the downtown storm system. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will improve operational efficiencies, save money on electrical costs, and help keep the downtown area from flooding during heavy rain conditions. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 94 1 If" ,n Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 95 1 If" a �Ninn� �NVNu�VN�1hiiflVil1NNYQ11h11111 !!Puiu j l Jr.. 1„1011��NP " 11 Proposed Action Update the Corpus Christi Stormwater Master Plan. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Corpus Christi City Council approved the Storm Water Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY99-00 on July 20, 1999 (Ordinance No. 023703). Included were separate projects for drainage studies in specific areas of the City. The need to integrate these individual drainage studies into a consistent, uniform analysis became evident and was approved in Storm Water CIP for FY00- 01, (Ordinance No. 024130). The City's use of master plans that date back to 1946, 1961, 1970, 1982, and 1988 resulted in the use of inconsistent criteria without an adopted level of protection policy. The separate projects are integrated into the FY00-01 Storm Water CIP as a Storm Water Master Plan Project. The Development of a comprehensive, updated, consistent Storm Water Master Plan based on an adopted Storm Water Criteria and Design Manual is necessary to respond to development, environmental issues and to better define and prioritize on going and future drainage capital improvement projects. The purposes of this project is as follows: a. Establish drainage criteria that reflects input from the different segments of the community (elected officials, developers, engineers, citizens, planning and zoning) and in the consensus process identify a "level of protection" for the City to be adopted as a standard for the City b. Adopt a drainage criteria and design procedure for designers to use in capital improvement projects and in the subdivision platting process of residential and commercial development c. Establish policy statements or guidelines that are responsive to storm water quality, storm water pollution prevention requirements, development issues for use in future street and drainage project design d. Develop a master plan to implement the drainage criteria established to include updates of the existing areas and production of new master plan for other areas. The master plan will include the inventory of all outfalls and data necessary for Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 96 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 97 1Page the design process and will utilize criteria and reflects the characteristics of each master plan Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATION ACTION f ETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Prioritization of major drainage improvements considering level of service and return on investment could greatly impact the operating budget and will help eliminate the flooding that impacts all of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $4,084,900 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORP( RATION INT O EXIST ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 97 1Page Bio MMtll°090Pyu11i111u1p°°NpNI'NNNiiiiiiiIIIIIIuUl����,�u 11111 1„"111111, Proposed Action Excavate silt and debris in Drainage Master Channel 31 caused by the erosion on sides and bottom of the Drainage Master Channel 31. Site and Location: Drainage Master Channel 31 in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Master Channel 31 was constructed in various phases in conjunction with the development in the area. The side slopes and bottom are severely eroded resulting in poor drainage and encroachment of ditch outside of the City right-of- way. This project will provide critical improvements to restore and improve the drainage profile and include erosion control measures such as side slope stabilization, soil treatment, vegetative cover and other best management practices. This project is planned in multiple phases as funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure M ITIGA11C N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,819,800 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 98 1 If" ,„n g („ Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department Implementation Schedule: 3-4 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 99 1Page uuiU.,I��1)flIuy��Aa�Na1)nnn4 IV�NuHA11uHph��VN1[NNHpYhhVldll! i, 1n w�'���� Proposed Action Improvements to side slopes on Schanen Ditch to eliminate erosion problems. fNFOIMATI Site and Location: Schanen Drainage Ditch in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The existing profile of Schanen Ditch exceeds the recommended slope of 4:1 and maximum of 3:1. This is resulting in major slope stabilization failure in multiple areas near the Yorktown Bridge. Work to improve this ditch will include excavation/backfill to widen and create 3:1 side slopes with stabilization matting, new culvert and outfalls, riprap and ditch bottom improvements, seeding, irrigation adjustments, traffic controls, dewatering and other miscellaneous items. Construction of Phase 1 of this project has been recently completed and future phases will be completed to the extent that funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTION f E7'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of channels and ditches is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,756,100 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department Implementation Schedule: 3-4 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 100 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 101 1Page lulUoollooAW1111r0n111nnn,u,11111I1111131pliiririririrli „Iv H 10. [o 1,1il1ra11I1111 11,I 111111111m� .111 11".!111111111111111111[111 Proposed Action La Voila Creek Channel Excavation (Phase 1) ACI INFORI Site and Location: La Voila Creek in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: This project will involve the improvement of La Voila Creek that crosses SH 357 (Saratoga Blvd). The project will provide 100 -year capacity for conveyance to the Oso Creek. Phase 1 Channel improvements include the removal of vegetation from the channel North of Saratoga Boulevard and channel widening South of Saratoga Boulevard. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN AC"I IEI111 DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of channels and ditches is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $4,152,800 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department 1-2 Years NCCRP(RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 102 lPage Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 103 1Page yl� AJlyj�(inntl411IV'G'IHVNu�VNgh�h11i�1NH11�Yhhlii,, o e I II uu fl Proposed Action Participate in the FEMA Flood Map Modernization Process. Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Federal Emergency Management Agency's Multi -Hazard Flood Map Modernization Program will update and digitize flood hazard maps across the nation. Most the City of Corpus Christi's FIRMs are nearly 20 years old. It is in the interest of the City and its residents for the maps, which determine flood insurance premiums, to be accurate and up-to-date. Other planning and hazard mitigation benefits are expected to accrue as well. The City of Corpus Christi is currently working through the appeals process of the map modernization Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATI bACTIN E- AIL N Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Increased participation in available flood insurance. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services 1-2 Years NCORP( RATION INT 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 104 1Page ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 105 1Page yru��ai,"n a �M�r��u�INHH� �ppppVuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu° Proposed Action Improve the City's CRS rating from a Class 7 to a Class 5. Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Corpus Christi has participated in the CRS program since 1991 and is currently rated as a Class 7 community, entitling its residents to a 15% discount on flood insurance premiums. This project is intended to improve its rating to a Class 5, thereby increasing the premium discount by an additional 10% for Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Other actions identified in this Mitigation Plan will have a direct bearing on fulfilling CRS requirements to qualify for the higher classification. This activity includes a comprehensive review of eligible activity requirements, identification of additional potential actions, monitoring completion of previously identified actions, and completing the application process. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGA11bN ACTION f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Increased participation in available flood insurance. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services 1-2 Years !NCO PO EXI TING P NS ANDPFIOCE CRS Program, Floodplain Regulations, and Stormwater Regulations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 106 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 107 1Page llilu��say��Aa�� � inn°1.11.; A� N �r��u�wNHH��nn�iu Proposed Action Build the Catulla Reservoir in the upper reaches of the Nueces River which would include a pipeline to divert water directly into Choke Canyon Reservoir. A INFO MATT Site and Location: Upper Reaches of Nueces River Risk Reduction Benefit: The Corps of Engineers studied the Cotulla Reservoir site, located in the upper Nueces Basin, in the 1960's. The recent Nueces River Basin Reconnaissance Study identified a potentially down -sized version of this project, including a pipeline to divert water directly into Choke Canyon Reservoir. In addition to the flood damage reduction potential for Lake Corpus Christi and the lower river basin, this project would enhance the regional water supply by increasing water storage capacity, and reducing losses associated with downstream evaporation across an 81 mile braided reach. During Phase 1 of the Feasibility Study, existing data will be reviewed to estimate the flood damage reduction potential of the project: a. A preliminary hydrologic analysis to determine the portion of the volume of historical lower- basin floods that originate upstream of Cotulla will be performed. b. A review of existing map information of the Nueces River for a 25 -mile reach downstream of the proposed reservoir to identify areas that could benefit from the potential flood damage reduction potential of the reservoir will be performed. c. Data from FEMA and other agencies on historical flood damages will be summarized. (Phase 2) Depending on the findings of the flood damage analyses, a daily flow flood model may need to be developed to evaluate the downstream flood damage reduction potential in terms of magnitude and frequency for the Cotulla Diversion Project. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 108 lPage MITIGATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods, Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Mitigate life-threatening hazards to buildings within the upper reaches of the Nueces River, while providing for a source of surface water to avoid disruption to essential utilities, eliminate the risk of potential economic loses. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $445,000 Potential Funding Sources: USACE will cover 50% and Non -Federal Sponsors will cover the remaining 50%. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Summer of 2018 INC RP( RATION INTd EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Nueces River Basin Reconnaissance Study ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 109 lPage I!Ii1I1JilluI h l91IIIIII Proposed Action Implementation of a Desalination Program Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi's Desalination Program is a progressive and proactive step to begin determining the feasibility of developing a drought proof future water supply using brackish groundwater and seawater. The City of Corpus Christi has secured grant funds from the US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) to assist with this project and will have expert technical resources with Reclamation providing their experience and guidance. The City has already secured $400,000 in grant funding for this project from Reclamation. This program will provide the City with the reliability, security, sustainability and availability of brackish groundwater and seawater as possible future water sources. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTIN f TAILti Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: The desalination program can be a secure source of freshwater to avoid disruption to essential utilities, eliminate the risk of potential economic loses. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,859,400 Potential Funding Sources: Water operation funds, raw water supply fund and bureau of Reclamation grant. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi 1-2 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 110 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 111 lPage liiD>�u��u�y�uAa�l0i1.,1nnn11,l111N'�NuNA�uNNhN�IV[1NpYNNVIN Q u11+?MNN'N�Ni • pip lily Air • " dodpp W9 Proposed Action Make improvements to the instrumentation system at Wesley Seale Dam. A INF OI MAl Site and Location: Wesley Seale Dam in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: This project provides for improvements to the original instrumentation system including annual safety inspection, integration with O.N. Stevens WTP process controls, The Howell-Bunger Valve, the downstream sluice gates, and the dewatering system, in response to previous inspections and priority investment recommendations into the system. This project will protect the integrity of the Wesley Seale Dam system (1957), to provide for proper inspection and updated regulatory reports per TCEQ. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods; Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will ensure the City can provide reservoir supplies to its customers and other downstream water right -holders and will secure the structural integrity of the dam through established dam safety protocols. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,850,600 Potential Funding Sources: Revenue Bond Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department 3-4 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 112 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 113 lPage 0.D.V.V1'l!1,1f1suyiAaN lir nnV�I NuNA11uHp�11111VNNNH4Yupn.h.l'! Proposed Action Maintain and adopt most current building codes. A INFOI MATT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi has adopted, with local amendments, the Building Codes effective September 1, 2016, The International Code Council (ICC), 2015 editions of the International Building Code, Existing Building Code, Energy Conservation Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code for One- and Two -Family Dwellings and the National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) National Electric Code. The International Building Codes are always being updated to provide better protection by utilizing the best construction practices. The City of Corpus Christi will be periodically updating the codes with code cycles that become available. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans Regulations A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Land Subsidence. Effect on new/existing buildings: By maintaining the most update building codes, the city is requiring that construction adhere to the most stringent codes, thus helping to reduce potential loses if exposed to a hazard. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/ Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 114 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 115 lPage 2-3 Years INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 115 lPage uuuuD��u�u�y�AaNN� jnnn��lV�NuHA�uHph��V��NNY�YhhVlgll�J����M�;�� r IdPOOVVvUlIII VOV1111.0.01.111 011111111 1IJJII VVJ1111(00111 Proposed Action Make improvements to the side seals on the Wesley Seale Dam Spillway to maintain the spillway's integrity. A INFOI MAl Site and Location: Wesley Seale Dam in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Wesley Seals Dam has 60 crest gates located in two separate spillways: the south spillway includes 27 gates and the north spillway includes 33 gates. Over the years, leakage from the side seals has increased and it has become significant at several of the gates. The water flow from the excessive leakage damages the concrete and encourages algae and other vegetative growth and leads to corrosion issues on the gates, metal appurtenances and reinforcing steel. This project provides for the necessary improvements including seal replacement, miscellaneous structural repairs and application of a protective coating system for the Dam. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATION ACTI N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will increase the service life of the structure and prevent future corrosion, subsequent section loss and connection deterioration which will potentially lower the probability of increased flooding. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $22,800,000 Potential Funding Sources: Revenue Bond Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 116 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 117 1 If" a 4-10 Years INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 117 1 If" a uuliu{yl� s ���;u�a�N �1 1'1 PI'P�fl�N11f 11�11111 Ii l)!� ��9u111.)dual�h 11111111111.1111c!il 1q11 , Ha'111111:1(.11,111,11011011.111.111111J1111)111 . � m� puug Proposed Action 11111.11):1'11'11.11,1:1„11„11111111111.111.1:11.111i; !!!!a?( " Build a floodwall along Corpus Christi Bay at the Science and Natural History Museum. ACKGR UND IN:FORI Site and Location: Corpus Christi Bay near the Science and Natural History Museum in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Recommendation to construct a new floodwall (or a coastal structure) that would follow a "hypotenuse" alignment between the existing Promenade and the USACE Bulkhead. The project would also backfill the triangle to make it function more like a coastal structure. This would also provide additional land area for future use. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of building a flood wall will help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the downtown area of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $3,5000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years INCORPO EXI TING PL N` ANDPFOCE Capital Improvements Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 118 1Page ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 119 1Page � �Nhfl�N�NflNN� ��� N� iggq�ll raw � �IIIII ,I IIII Proposed Action Make improvements to the erosion on sides and bottom of Drainage Master Channel 31. fNFOI MAli Site and Location: Drainage Master Channel 31 in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Master Channel 31 was constructed in various phases in conjunction with the development in the area. The side slopes and bottom are severely eroded resulting in poor drainage and encroachment of ditch outside of the City right-of- way. This project will provide critical improvements to restore and improve the drainage profile and include erosion control measures such as side slope stabilization, soil treatment, vegetative cover and other best management practices. This project is planned in multiple phases as funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Structure and Infrastructure A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Developmen Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 120 1page INCORPORATIONI T ISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 121 1Page i �� ui u�a �ni�iNi Nid hn� �I' 1111 mu 1101111 Ili1.010 looljl)„, 4 001 �r mo1011010011pillil 11111111 MI' 11 Proposed Action Utilize the city adopted "Developer Agreement" tha the can use with developers to help cover the cos of installing over -sized stormwater drainage. ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Under the platting ordinance, the City of Corpus Christi participates with developers on utility construction for over -sized main stormwater lines. These funds may also be used to address development drainage concerns. This project will provide for the City's share of such projects, as necessary, up to the approved amount. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $3,100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Stormwater Master Plan and Regulations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 122 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 123 1Page II�i0000ii gNNhN� mill "11 'f 1 Proposed Action Mill eiiipiiliovoyoyoW UIIIVIIUpUU 00 000 I„..1111.011111 1100001010101000 ,0000010 00:g°1°11100111110,1011010 0.,1000c00;01.1,10,11.1i0 Complete an assessment of the needed repairs and improvements on all 8 major and 100 mino stormwater outfalls that drain into Corpus Christi Bay. ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: There are eight major storm water outfalls and more than 100 other outfalls that allow runoff to drain into Corpus Christi Bay. In 2003, 13.5 miles of these outfall structures were inspected and improvements and repairs were made to four outfalls. The purpose of this current project is to provide an updated assessment, which may include the Brawner/proctor and Gollihar outfalls and other outfalls, pending results of the initial assessment, and providing recommendations for repairs, improvements, and rehabilitation as necessary. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N ACt ISN DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of the storm water conveyance systems is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $2,447,200 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 124 1 If" ,n g 000000 Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Engineering Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 125 1Page ������pilU�J V�u��?�NAa�N �ry� unnnN�IH.;1.1m�h�NNNp�NN�Yhhul�°;� Proposed Action Complete a feasibility study of Oso Creek at the confluence of La Volta Creek to determine if any construction projects will help the creek conveyance capacity during high flow events. A fNFORMA,. Site and Location: Oso Creek in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The drainage profiles of Oso Creek east of the La Volta Creek confluence show several constrictions that impact the base flood elevations upstream. This project will investigate the feasibility of the construction of additional creek conveyance capacity for high flow events. If the investigation shows a significant potential to impact the base flood elevation, then construction will be completed in those areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATI ON ACTI N (DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of the storm water conveyance of Oso Creek is critical to avoid potential rising surface water elevations that would result in encroachment flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $4,715,400 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Engineering Department Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 126 1page INCORPORATIONI T ISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 127 lPage UNNN� NYY�� ����������I�luuu�luuuuuuuum I�I�IU I� Proposed Action Have ISO conduct another assessment to see if the City has done enough improvements to its building department to gain a better BCEGS rating. A INFOI MATT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) is an independent organization that administers the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BECGS) to assess "the building codes in effect in a particular community and how the community enforces its building codes, with special emphasis on mitigation of losses from natural hazards." The grading can influence the cost of insurance coverage in the community. Since its last assessment, the City of Corpus Christi has adopted the 2015 International Building Code and the 2016 International Residential Code for One and Two Family Dwellings, among others, and should be eligible for an improved grade. This activity includes scheduling a re -assessment and compiling the necessary documentation. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Land Subsidence. Effect on new/existing buildings: Public participation in available insurance discount options on Homeowners insurance policies. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Cost/ Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 128 lPage Implementation Schedule: 1-2 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Building Code Regulations; CRS; Floodplain Regulations ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 129 1 If" a �IiuD����IuyNAaNN���nnn��lV�NuNA�uHph1,VN�NNH�YhhVldllIpIII. � 1,1,1il1111 Proposed Action Implement a multi -hazard public awareness program. A INFOIMATI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi has seen multiple hazards occur within the years past. Most residents are heavily informed of what to do during heavy rains, tropical storms and hurricanes. However, there are multiple hazards that are not as frequent. The City will be working towards creating and disseminating a pamphlet(s) that will cover what to do before, during and after the following hazards: Extreme Heat, Lighting, Hailstorm, Hurricane and Tropical Storms, Windstorms, Tornados, Drought, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure, Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence and Wildfires Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGA14bN ACTION f ETAILti Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire. Effect on new/existing buildings: Homeowners will know what types of mitigations actions they can do to protect their lives and properties from the hazard risks. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services and Office of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review and Administer Annually Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 130 1page INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E CRS ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 131 lPage uuill���JRVA°1N��+WWII'hi�I����4�NI"ryhuu�ipP1dN,Pd�,I,'11.111111111 1 NN�0.'�°H p1PRRN1111 1111111.1.1. 11,111,11'11'011,111 ivvv. ologooloopoi Proposed Action Map and assess the vulnerabilities the city may face for Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence, and Wildfires ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Improve data and mapping on specific risks for coastal erosion, expansive soils, land subsidence and wildfires. Use GIS to identify and map erosion areas, riparian landslides, expansive soils and wildfires. Develop and maintain a database to track vulnerability and indicate where critical structures and any development is located in relation to the hazardous areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATION ACTI N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence, Wildfires Effect on new/existing buildings: By identifying the hazards, the city can provide advice as to previous hazards for future construction or preservation purposes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Cost/Staff time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services and GIS Implementation Schedule: 1-2 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T L 3 AND PI OC URE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 132 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 133 1Page uiIIJD>1 Vuiuy�AaNN a nnpI�I NNuNA uN 1111111111111,I.,.11,..,.114..1.1„.1,1.11,11.. Proposed Action Installation of groins and/or breakwaters to the areas behind the bulkhead to retrofit the areas that are eroding. ACKGR UND IN:F( RI Site and Location: Cole Park in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Coastal Erosion in Corpus Christi Bay is a serious issue. Prevention of further erosion of the shoreline at Cole Park, which is along Corpus Christi Bay through the installation of groins and/or breakwaters. Cole Park is a high use park with the city. The area behind the bulkhead is eroding and needs to be retrofitted. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITIGATI N ACTION f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $500,000 - $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Potential funding from the Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Program (CEPRA) and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 24-30 Months Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 134 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 135 1Page III u� �l�s NAY �II� II flllu uuuNluiN n 1111m n n Proposed Action ,4IllviiI omIIo IIvIIulu „ fig I111100000011 1111111111111 ts bi p oiuui IIII Adopt a local lightning ordinance for non-residential structures that are over 50' in height. A INFOr IMAI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Currently, the City of Corpus Christi does not have an ordinance that requires lighting protection for commercial structures; but, instead provides guidelines if property owners choose to add the protection. The City of Corpus Christi will be considering adopting local language that would require commercial structures over 50 feet to have adequate lighting protection. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Lightning Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: By adopting this type of higher standard in the city building codes, we are adding additional protection that can possibly reduce the risk for damages. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Costs/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Implementation Schedule: 12-18 Months NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 136 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 137 1Page lgldl IIi�N�� llllvplllpl� 11,111111.11111„ i�111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IJJi1111fri��ll Proposed Action Adopt a local ordinance requiring all habitable structures to have air conditioning. A INFOr IMAI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The International Building Codes do not require a habitable space to be air conditioned, but instead requires for it to be heated. The City of Corpus Christi will be considering adopting language that would require all habitable spaces to have adequate air condition to reduce the effects that extreme heat has on the city's population. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Extreme Heat Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: By requiring habitable spaces to be air conditioned, it will provide for added protection for the building occupant in the event of an extreme heat event. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Costs/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Implementation Schedule: 12-24 Months INCORPO EXI"STING PLANS ANLL PRICE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 138 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 139 1Page II IIIU,If IVJJIk' idll 1 1:H111011DH ,00lifilli11,111,1111111111111,1 OIL u Proposed Action Design and implement a dam breach study for dams in Corpus Christi. ACKGR UND INFORI Site and Location: Barney M Davis Cooling Reservoir Dam, Calallen Reservoir Dam, Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Risk Reduction Benefit: Better hazard -related information will improve the disaster resilience of the community. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from improved hazard information Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCOF RI F ATION INT L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 140 1 If" ,n VIII11 " 11111111111 11 III 111111 fflI 1111 III 11111111111111111 II11Mmffil IIIIIII 11:1 L IIIIIIIIII Plan Maintenance Procedures 1 Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Updating 2 Continued Public Involvement 12 Plan Maintenance Procedures The following is an explanation of how the Planning Team will implement the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, and continue to evaluate and enhance it over time. In order to ensure that the Plan remains current and relevant, the following plan maintenance procedures will be addressed: • Ensure the mitigation strategy remains current and is implemented according to Plan procedures • Secure and maintain an ongoing mitigation program throughout the community • Integrate short and long-term mitigation objectives into community officials' daily roles and responsibilities • Continued Public Involvement and maintain momentum by routine engagement of the Plan's progress Monitoring and Evaluation Periodic tracking of the Plan is required to ensure that the goals, objectives, and mitigation action plans are implemented over time. Revisions may be necessary to ensure that the Plan is in full compliance with federal regulations and state statutes. This section outlines the procedures for completing such revisions, updates, and Plan review. Table 20-1 indicates the department or title responsible for this action. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 1 1 If" ,n Table 20-1. Team Members Responsible for Plan Maintenance Il,ill i, 111,11111( VIII(; Ilfjflll IUI Unincorporated Nueces County City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop City of Corpus Christi City of Driscoll City of Petronila City of Port Aransas City of Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority Emergency Management Coordinator Mayor Mayor Floodplain Manager Mayor Mayor Emergency Management Coordinator Fire Chief/Emergency Management Coordinator Public Safety Director/Manager of Emergency Management Monitoring The Multi -Jurisdictional HMAP planning team representing each participating jurisdiction will convene a meeting annually to monitor the plan and track the status of each jurisdiction's identified mitigation actions over the 5 -year cycle of the Plan. Nueces County as coordinating entity will make arrangements to bring the team together. Mitigation Actions will be assigned to team members in advance of the meetings to prepare status reports to share with the team. Mitigation action status updates will include continued feasibility for implementation and funding. Evaluation Each jurisdiction will evaluate changes in risk, determine whether the implementation of mitigation actions is on schedule, or if there are any implementation issues such as changes in stated purposes or goals that affect mitigation priorities in each participating jurisdictions' respective department or organization. The Plan Maintenance group will meet on an annual basis to identify any needed changes in the Plan based upon their evaluation activities. Updating Annual reports submitted by the designated Team member from each community evaluating the Plan will be used to keep the Plan updated. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 2 1 If" ,n Five Year Review The Plan will be thoroughly reviewed by the appointed Planning Team at the end of three years from the approval date to determine whether there have been any significant changes in the area that may necessitate changes in the types of mitigation actions proposed. Nueces County, as coordinating entity, will make arrangements to bring the team together and begin the update process 2 years prior to plan expiration. New flood studies and new development in flood -prone areas, an increased exposure to hazards, disaster declarations, the increase or decrease in capability to address hazards, and changes to federal or state regulations are examples of factors that may affect the content of the Plan. The Plan review provides the Planning Team an opportunity to evaluate those actions that have been successful and to explore documenting potential losses avoided due to the implementation of specific mitigation measures. The Plan review also provides the opportunity to address mitigation actions that may not have been successfully implemented as assigned. It is recommended that the Planning Team meet to review the Plan at the end of three years as grant funds may be necessary for the development of a five-year update. Due to the timelines for grant cycles, it is wise to begin planning grant options in advance of the five-year deadline. Following the review, any revisions deemed necessary will be summarized and implemented according to the reporting procedures and Plan amendment process outlined herein. Upon completion of the review and update/amendment process, the revised Plan will be submitted to TDEM for final review and approval in coordination with FEMA. Incorporating the Plan into Other Planning Mechanisms The County and participating entities will work to integrate the hazard mitigation strategies into other planning mechanisms. The Planning Team will ensure that future growth, disaster recovery, historic preservation, flood response plans, and other planning mechanisms will be consistent with the goals of the Plan. Key Planning Team members from the participating jurisdictions, will meet annually, and more often if warranted, to ensure mitigation actions prioritized as high to moderate are tracked and monitored based on federal Disaster Declarations, HMGP and PDM funding cycles, and other non-federal funding sources that would help communities meet the local HMA match. The potential funding sources listed for each identified action may be used when the Planning Team member begins to seek funds to implement actions. An implementation time period, or a specific implementation date, has been assigned to each action as an Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 3 1 P a incentive for completing each task and gauging whether actions are implemented in a timely manner. Existing plans for the participating jurisdictions will be reviewed in light of the Plan, and Team Members will incorporate any mitigation policies and actions into these plans as appropriate. Table 20-1 indicates Planning Team member roles for incorporating actions, method of incorporation, and approving authority. Table 20-2 identifies planning mechanisms available for the participating jurisdictions and provides examples of how the Plan will be incorporated into current efforts. Table 20-2. Planning Mechanisms and Method to Incorporate Into the Plan Annual Budget 0����lljll I��I�I�I�II�IIIIIIII"ui�i�i011j�lllll °'111111" ii our ryi yi l 1111111 Il II Funding mitigation projects and local match requirements Emergency Planning and Emergency Identifying hazards and assessing Operations Plan vulnerabilities Mutual Aid Agreements Assessing vulnerabilities/needs Floodplain Ordinance/ Stormwater Mitigation strategies; higher regulatory Management considerations Land Use Maps and New Flood Studies Critical Facilities Building and Zoning Codes State Hazard Mitigation Plan Assessing vulnerabilities and flood risk; development trends; long-term growth Location and protection Development trends; future growth Risk analysis It will be the responsibility of each participating jurisdiction to determine department or title of personnel responsible for implementation of mitigation strategies and implementation procedures. All jurisdictions will comply with local and state requirements while incorporating this Plan into existing planning mechanisms. A list of planning mechanisms available to the jurisdictions can be found in Appendix A. The mitigation actions in Section 19 describe the planning mechanisms into which the mitigation actions will be integrated. In the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 4 1 P a process of integrating the mitigation actions into new and existing planning mechanisms, the participating jurisdictions will: • Nueces County — Actions will be presented to Commissioner's Court by the responsible department. Upon approval by Commissioner's Court, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Agua Dulce — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Bishop— Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Corpus Christi — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Driscoll — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Petronila — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Robstown — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • Port of Corpus Christi Authority - Actions will be presented to the Port Commission by the responsible department. Upon approval by the Port Commission, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 5 1 P a Expansion of Capabilities Vatitaaaa\S��0\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ City Staff All participating jurisdictions have city or county staff. While the number and involvement of these staff members in the planning process varies, all participating jurisdictions benefit from the presence of staff members. Staff are involved in the planning process and the implementation of mitigation actions. Staff will be able to help planning team members, serve as stakeholders, and coordinate the monitoring and maintenance process of this Plan. Annual Budget Review All participating jurisdictions have an annual budget review. Jurisdictions will incorporate the Plan while conducting their annual budget reviews. High priority mitigation actions will be reviewed and may potentially receive funds to ttCQilaitl\SSS Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan County's stormwater management plan. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Emergency Operations The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvement Plan Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the County's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 6 1 If" a Wildfire Protection Plan Floodplain Order Emergency Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. The Plan will be used in updating the floodplain order and ensuring sound floodplain management. The goals of both documents are to reduce vulnerability to flooding hazards. The Plan will be consulted for NFIP compliance, flood risk, and extent. Information from this Plan will be reviewed for inclusion in other documents, including the floodplain order. Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 7 1 If" a SSSSSIIIIIIIIII\M\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan City's stormwater management plan. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the City's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Floodplain Management The Plan will be used in updating the floodplain management plan Plan and ensuring sound floodplain management. The goals of both documents are to reduce vulnerability to flooding hazards. The Plan will be consulted for NFIP compliance, flood risk, and extent. Information from this Plan will be reviewed for inclusion in other documents, including the floodplain management plan. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 8 1 If" a Y44i\slls)\\s Plan Comprehensive/Master Plan. It is important to ensure that development occurs in a manner that does not increase hazard risk. The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and probability of many natural hazards. By incorporating this information into the Comprehensive/Master Plan, development can be guided in a hazard -resilient manner. Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan City's stormwater management plan. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the City's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Stormwater Ordinance The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the City's stormwater ordinance. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 9 1 If" a \ ASSSSIIIIIII\M\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ NFIP Community Rating The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and System probability of flooding hazards. This information can and should be used in the City's Community Rating System (CRS) program. One of the major goals of the CRS program is to go above the minimum standards of the NFIP. Many of the mitigation actions identified in this Plan involve exceeding the minimum standards of the NFIP. By incorporating this Plan into the City's CRS program, the goals of flooding hazard reduction can be met. Floodplain Ordinance The Plan will be used in updating the floodplain ordinance and ensuring sound floodplain management. The goals of both documents are to reduce vulnerability to flooding hazards. The Plan will be consulted for NFIP compliance, flood risk, and extent. Information from this Plan will be reviewed for inclusion in other documents, including the floodplain ordinance. 0 u Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 10 1 If" a YlkfAx1.\\11.11.11\\\\\\Ilsl‘A\\ Plan Comprehensive/Master Plan. It is important to ensure that development occurs in a manner that does not increase hazard risk. The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and probability of many natural hazards. By incorporating this information into the Comprehensive/Master Plan, development can be guided in a hazard -resilient manner. Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the City's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 11 1 If" a Comprehensive Master Plan Emergency Action Plan Comprehensive/Master Plan. It is important to ensure that development occurs in a manner that does not increase hazard risk. The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and probability of many natural hazards. By incorporating this information into the Comprehensive/Master Plan, development can be guided in a hazard -resilient manner. The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the PCCA's Emergency Action Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Program PCCA's stormwater management program. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the PCCA's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Continued Public Involvement Input from the stakeholders and public was an integral part of the preparation of this Plan and will continue as the Plan grows and changes. This Plan will be posted on the Nueces County website where local officials and the public will be invited to provide ongoing feedback. The task of notifying stakeholders and community members on an annual basis will be held with the identified Nueces County Planning Team members tasked with updates and annual Plan review. The Planning Team will have the added task of maintaining the Plan as a part of their job description. Media such as the local newspaper and radio stations will be used to notify the public of any maintenance or periodic review activities taking place. Public participation will be sought during the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation phases of the plan. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 12 1 If" ,n III ffiffiffiffi imm milimm. ASS % Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix A 1 1 If" a Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Nueces County Name and Title: EMC Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan None Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance X Master Draining plan Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan X Floodplain Management Plan X Economic Development Plan X Regional Transportation Plan X Part of Regional Transportation Agency Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance No NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance X Order Building Code (include name/year under Comments) No Zoning Ordinance No Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open X Ongoing maintenance. Space/Recreation Use X Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement, Coastal Bend Council of Governments Master Mutual Aid Agreement 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Ongoing maintenance. Mutual Aid Agreements (between neighboring jurisdictions) X Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement, Coastal Bend Council of Governments Master Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X Emergency manager X Floodplain manager X Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) X Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer X Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official No 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Financial Resources Yes No Comments Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via website and facebook. Ongoing Emergency/Hurricane Prepapredness activity and outreacxh year round. S. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list; any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Auga DuIce, Tx Name and Title: MayorHoward/EMC Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan None Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance No ordinance or current storm water system Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan None Floodplain Management Plan None Economic Development Plan None Transportation Plan Part of Regional Transportation Agency routes. Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X As part of the Nueces County Plan Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance No NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance No Building Code (include name/year under Comments) No Zoning Ordinance No Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open X Ongoing maintenance. Space/Recreation Use ESD 5 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Ongoing maintenance. Mutual Aid Agreements (betweenX neighboring jurisdictions) ESD 5 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X Contract service. Emergency manager X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Floodplain manager No Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) No Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer No Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official No 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Financial Resources Yes No Comments Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via email. S. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list; any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Bishop, Tx City Secretary Contreras/EMC Name and Title: Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY - Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations in thespace provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan X Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance X Part of master plan Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan X Floodplain Management Plan X Economic Development Plan X Regional Economic Development Plan Transportation Plan Part of Regional Transportation Agency routes. Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X As part of the Nueces County Plan Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance X NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance X Building Code (include name/year under Comments) X ICC 2004 Zoning Ordinance X Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open X Ongoing maintenance. Space/Recreation Use ESD 3 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Ongoing maintenance. Mutual Aid Agreements (betweenX neighboring jurisdictions) ESD 3 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X Contract service. Emergency manager X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Floodplain manager X Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) X Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer X Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official X 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Financial Resources Yes No Comments Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via email. S. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list; any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 ca Oval* ity A0.0 potsord 51,itygy Jori5dict on rt f r :hepta;: City of Corpus Christi: pit.t.kit 1411.6 `ti$l lila! itC�dr f: Pt RC tHNG AN EGULATORY CAP BIU Y;:-' PIBase Inthcate wh tt r th@ toIbwin pl nr� ng or r gufaio tools Glans, ord rsa css, c ass ar pr rams a curra.ntly )n pia�a or. under:d velopmeni for>youridnsdfction Pl ase,pr94de;adR onal;comments;or:.ex�slanaiians its>the space prow+ded or:,with at€achments ',: i ^i(:•:::�[ .r•t:''+�sr;l.>,�'+'�'!'�.:Mz •':=y{z'S - rS ; .3. i"?•� .. ••,t./-'.> .�'1 r •!�' : > '� •r-`,„ i;° ' .ii'):: - :. 1-• :"'':� i,>v . <.:v:;::s•:CIG::::i:`•s�'�i.�:r-;:;•;',•�:r .\. �,r .):. �. . a1•.}t F.1tf p{�. � 1N1 iC" 5[ [.,*.w.!{ ': v#.':. i!'WS" ,S , r ��"•,"3Z •i'i.j 311 r•:$- :;%r. %rte ., \•'% <or Comprehensive i asterPlan Stormwater Management Pian 1 Ord ncarice r:��'''H•:o •:'-,[+!^'! >`>•r ,3':. :) ✓.' �' f.�. .,..! :::r .,.�l}4.•.v ''r'i� i�'y {t'��1� ; 1 'C1_ i;C",..FiII..' %!<a. 'r,)>, ::i .i::.:3 .J.:��; �1'i .. . -.Jh:1'::�i �.1}Ir':. > f,.. . t., i1•':t'•r: . -SA EI � , r�si rS• [[[bbb bT� :,-A� �[� I: `.' ;k%.fi` ,v'r': =.!TiY� ..�F'Ili: �:SJ ��•�l'✓'i.�'T , "s r/i 4i is `•`•i ::t•:,• :.;: xP >`r .. ,: # i1St•r�.:, ,e S aNl'�`..):��.L r! .;;:1.. r.i,., .'l, T,���.✓ Y S, u:i.i.Y. f >'ir;�e3V,;'r"?;;. „i)€CiLCfB. !'i')I /.�., >..rJr. r'%+.1.,.:.. „rr:.� '-�•=^""' .,,)r' ...T'I:�{ >•'? ,r..i.. .'% :i •., 1. „r ? .✓ , - :(''/'1 rl �'..( -a Jj'�. .".f..� .i fr i.•�:,:1 ii,'�.. )i�l: �:i: %�•�i,'�. �: ,ri".5..� Z,s �>. l�.�-'S.t^='l,,r•,.�•� I Emergency Operations Plan Capital Improvements ?fan Fioodpiain Management Pian Economic Development Plan...... .... Transportation Pian Continuity of Operations Pian W ldlire Protection Plan1111 XMil 3r x . =Sts :<:y` ) Ire' p,�q 'r /.' �rst'!In(� j,� i1. s i{�l "-'� w r•;!'�. s>'':' Nom:.,.., ::Gix;J . � .,/• jn ':.'. �M1 ra_.�. r�r�,p•; � sr• �y- 3 , ��••`•':�:'.`<i :;-= �'1..,a'::% 1. r• _ :. �•�:ii •,•,!:: ?;:::;i'r'•' ?;i.' :a:'s:: is tri �;?iii';:'� -�.' siarisfwater ON inanck : '.•j[. NFIP Community Ran t.Systern ...... (ORS. Program) Floodplain Ordinance . .' :. Building Code (include name/yaw under Cornmenis) .ZOnintg 0 Mance MI . 201.5 Air r e :.. ... . ... Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use ' LcCalapavbility-Aswan. t Survey... I1\i1 TIVEANOTEdHNicA c ' I i'rt ? € 3 #tier Ofi501010141Y41r0P0 ittgO011owin otaff t 0.91- er wih1rt Its rrrnnt t#r a 00l> 0sporca0' riS.Jl,„;...,,,A,..6,,, Z.Y.C.'��.�- ,�.'>�;..i...� .r.,:rs . pi.„g!sono,a :L.i,�..[•'ys!r +-n"s,Rir.•ji:..!_'.;7•.e::..':t%.i.,.,:./.,LL,.> i.lT. ��r.?s;7::;s;�<,:�. .k , ��n"f�.'2wt.P,lr,.?:. l ::il �s.,_•l.c•3.:.�1."-.a, fi.Q.. .>r,,. . ���n:.Tx1, u,i;.:(!�:-,:•i:rr�<.r`,�r:c- '%`�i>:'r=. l '4T.r.r-,, �v /✓.-�.% �i.-0/7rl i%.r-'fi.�.: •.:l.rsl<.T.#.r.\,•'4,,'.0<---• :,^ .••"s ,.4�"// ri•,l, ,rrsri\^_,teM!•..;,,a:.•�r r-{{t•�:• •.'f �ir'.:c.. }(. a,-,;;.?i •,%:j✓..:a:;',;:....r.i\..;�,•.. .!� 'r`.,.Sr:y:r".i..:<>..$)i�;:...,;':,i.,�L�,51.�7�•..3.3':.:,.';,,.=.i:�#. J•„'C'...�Jr/.,'r•a.:r'�r�, . . o )'s- ,',.rSf •;1Y%,r,....,..,,.. ;"!. Maintenance program t4 reduce risk . {tree trimming, clearing drainage systems} t+ t lual Nd Agreements (between neighboring }wsdictkns) . " Miligallon Nanning Carrratee Community Planner SI If Engineer &snergency manager. ..: X k. . Floodplain manager f ersonnel skilled to GeographEc . . intonation Systems (GIS) . Warning SysterrisfouWoof 'srert, reverse 01 1, oiler.. Grant Writer .:. 1.1azard Delaihistorical. disaster date Chief Bulding.Cllidal 74 . 3. FISCAL CAPAWITY Please indtcate whether your ]urisOiction has access to or to use ;the following Et cat flnanc[al resources far:h r rruiigatian pwposes s eligible: . r t , �4ii �.•: mss:- ,r .'=•l.� �Ss. if: n:a,-i-•., is r. .-... Capital Itriprov.ernent Programming .•:x r - cF is'�'• ,..1 :;; !,� _ r-:/..::,•:.^: #1.7,RIM - -•'J :. ,<1::. - -i: �•�•;...�.>,•�;. Commmurnity. Development Block Grants (CDlIG) Page 2 of 3 Sto€tr F.e .. Development lmpaetF .s. Attm'lsrrity tolevy taxes Cor spe.citjc: purposes 1:L".E UCA iON ANI] fl13TRE ACH Please idar€tlfy any 0,000 ion and optre4clt programs. nd.;€t� thuds aiready;fn place that could bp;used to fro ptq.me sl n igation:ac.ttyr cam' rrzunlcate hazard related lnfQrrnation such as school prograrrts, StorfReady, P,raWls .ptr rams, nviranmsntat protecfinr ; i vacuatipn;plan, erriergar�cy preparedn ss pi # Ilc;: ;:; sducation'programs S.; ii Rapdy., # aver 0.al ri. Pi.tO BfRad.pifng, :gP.R V O, S lel' 1GATIOWAOTItli''tE ;P(eas :Eist'any,previot s mitigatior .actMties(e g str rcturai adproleets ar gr €rts) that haus beery i wt1E ba::l• or your pommunityxis:Ploase include :'Ana ,titie;of the.:project:orgrant:along with any, start or.;complet{an:,:::: dates and the department or agency responsible; f-age3of2 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Petronila, Tx Name and Title: Mayor Burkhardt/EMC Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations. in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan None Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance No ordinance or current storm water system Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan None Floodplain Management Plan None Economic Development Plan None Transportation Plan Part of Regional Transportation Agency routes. Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X As part of the Nueces County Plan Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance No NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance No Building Code (include name/year under Comments) No Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Zoning Ordinance Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use X No 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff 1 Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Mutual Aid Agreements (betweenX neighboring jurisdictions) ESD 3 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X No Emergency manager X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Floodplain manager No Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) No Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer No Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official No 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY —Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to of to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Financial Resources Yes No Comments Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via email. 5. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: City of Robstown Name and Title: Ricardo Gonzalez, EMC 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please indicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances,codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional oomments or explanations in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan X Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance x Emergency Operations Plan x Capital Improvements Plan x Floodplain Management Plan Economic Development Plan x Transportation Plan x Continuity of Operations Plan Wildfire Protection Plan x Under Nueces County Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) x Floodplain Ordinance x Ordinance No. 785 Building Code (include name/year under Comments) x International Building Codes 2012 Zoning Ordinance x Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use x Main Street Properties Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY -Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnelresources Staff / Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) x Robstown Utility Systems has a tree trimming program Mutual Aid Agreements (between neighboring jurisdictions) X Corpus Christi, Annaville, Bluntzer, Bishop, Driscoll, Petronilla Mitigation Planning Committee x Ricardo Gonzalez, Javier Zapata, Herman Rodriguez, Beatriz Charo Community Planner x Staff Engineer x Emergency manager x Floodplain manager X City Inspector is designated as the Floodplain Administrator Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) X Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Grant Writer x Hazard Data/historical disaster data Chief Bulding Official x FISCAL CAPABILITY,- Please indicate whether your jurisdjction has access to or is eligible; to use thefollowing local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Capital Improvement Programming Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) x Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Stormwater Utility Fees Development Impact Fees Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH -Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protect on, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Evacuation Annex E, Annual Evacuation Drill, Annual Hurricane Conference (Local), Participate in Nueces County Wildfire Plan 5. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that havebeen or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates andthe department or agency responsible. Fire Department Emergency Generator- Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, completed 2/2009 Wastewater Generator- Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, completed 7/2009 Emergency Shutters, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, completed 1/2009 Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Name and Title: Tom Mylett, Director of Port Security 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY Please indicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place. Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan Yes N/A Bulk Terminal Master Plan, Strategic Plan and associated Strategic Action Plans Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance Yes N/A Storm Water Management Program - Rev. 1 01/23/2012 and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program- Rev. 5 11/01/11 Emergency Operations Plan Yes N/A Emergency Action Plan Effective Date 01/1/14 Capital Improvements Plan Yes N/A Annual Capital Improvements Plan Ten Year Capital Improvements Plan Bulk Terminal Master Plan La Quinta Security Plan Fire Water Pressurization Study Rail Master Plan Corpus Christi Metro Transporation Plan (Participant in MPO) Floodplain Management Plan Yes N/A Covered by City and County FMPs. Design to one year above the flood plain. Economic Development Plan Yes N/A Coastal Bend Council of Governments Regional Economic Development Plan Transportation Plan Yes N/A Metropolitan Planning Organization Continuity of Operations Plan No Yes In progress Wildfire Protection Plan Yes N/A Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan- Nueces County OEM Planning/ Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development, Comments Stormwater Ordinance Yes N/A City ordinances where applicable. NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) Yes N/A Corpus Christi only Floodplain Ordinance Yes N/A Cities and Counties Building Code (include name/year under Comments) Yes N/A 2015 International Codes: International Code Council (ICC) 2015 - International Building Code (IBC) - Existing Building Code - Energy Conservation Code - Fuel Gas Code - Mecahnical Code - Plumbing Code - National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) National Electric Code Zoning Ordinance Yes N/A City ordinances where applicable. Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use Yes N/A Strategic Action Plan - Be an Environmental Leader; Public Fishing Area; La Quinta Buffer Areas 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff Staff / Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) Yes N/A Maintenance Department Mutual Aid Agreements (between neighboring jurisdictions) N/A No All cities and counties are party to regional master mutual aid agreement. Port of Corpus Christi Authority is currently not a party. Mitigation Planning Committee Yes N/A Established in support of current planning effort Community Planner N/A No Staff Engineer Yes N/A Engineering Department Emergency manager Yes N/A Emergency Management Department Floodplain manager No Covered by City and County FMs Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Yes N/A Environmental Planning & Compliance Department Page 1 of 2 Local Capability Assessment Survey Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other Yes N/A Outdoor warning siren at Bulk Termnial facility, Reverse Alert (Everbridge) Grant Writer Yes N/A Finance Department Hazard Data/historical disaster data Yes N/A Risk Management Department. Data available for past five years only. Chief Bulding Official Yes N/A David L. Krams, P.E. 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial Financial Resources Yes Np : ' Comments Capital Improvement Programming Yes N/A Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) N/A No Not eligible Stormwater Utility Fees N/A No Development Impact Fees N/A No Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Yes N/A Authority however do not currently levy (have never in history of organization- 90 years) Other: Authority to level fees (tariffs) for specific purposes Yes N/A 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that Conduct extensive training through multiple venues under the Environmental Management System and Storm Water Compliance Programs. 5. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects Storm Water Upgrades - upgrades to existing systems (JFC, Sigmor, North Bank) to improve runoff, installation of gate valves; Nueces River Fishing Area Drainage Improvements; Green Design Guidelines and Environmental Checklists for Construction and Design; Fire Boat Addition and Construction of New Fire Boat; Dock Facillity; Fire Fighting Capability Evaluation Page 2 of 2 mummummummum.num1111111111?1?1111111111111 1111111 1111111B mull! IPY Overview 1 Public Survey Results 2 Overview Nueces County prepared a public survey with questions for the public concerning their opinions regarding natural hazards. The survey was made available on the Nueces County website. Survey results are depicted on the following pages, showing the percentage of responses for each answer. For questions that did not provide a multiple- choice answer, or that required an explanation, comments are summarized where similar. Figure B-1: Screen Shot of Public Survey Link on Nueces County Website 1111 11111111 1111111111110 Iwo 1111111 IIIIIIIIIII1J1J1u1111J11111111111111111111111111111111111111,111,11,11,11111,11111111,11IIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111"" (Ill o 111111111 11111111111111 to litylowl 00000.00000000000000000:0000,00:0:0:0:0:0:0:000:10:00011,00111,11,00,1001010001:111,100000:0000 0:00.00:000000000011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101,11:1111,1:11 1 .0101161 1000000001 000 00111111110 160001 NA. 1111111100110 NOJKlety trre# AVVIM the ,'OSIWNIAW 042'0%44 INO 461101*,4 [Mom MOO IVIP* 000/pl* NAV kott and woo* on 14.41K, Cdo,ny, "ma , AN6o11,4•00111, Ketat MOO: And clrA ,xo *tan iry argot/WI compavrift. to v6„umone04 0.44frlonadtclormal 1,4600,Mrpot, ,,1114;b0,n11,11,01$ fiNt404 ,„otim keorp 11ed rovve &WA .01,"01.1,01110 P,,Oft 'AK/ KrAfiAt Ntafl Ab000f De as 440,0,M ,livs reoAttim qosow40,1 It I% *AI Oupory 1110.46* worA4 6,10"100.00100WIY 44011n4fInvAIMEZItive MIM,010,01( NOM., 1,0 ,M11,1,1,10,,,,,,,,(...rnrnerWIIMMI...1,10M1,1,0101,41.4.1.M1,1,0101,11,1%,./M ,(.1,010/0,1,11M .11M,M,00.10,11M, IMIMMOW,IIMONN,11,110, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 11Page Public Survey Questions & Results Question #1: n� To� nc Answer Options MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 Please state the jurisdiction city or community) in which you reside or represent. t. ul, Unincoirpo 000s C 11111111111111111111111111 Unincorporated Nueces County City of Corpus Christi City of Robstown City of Port Aransas Town of Bishop Town of Driscoll Town of Agua Dulce Town of Petronila Port of Corpus Christi Authority Other (please specify) City ot Chill ill qty Response Percent Response Count 16.7% 2 50.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 2 1 IP o Question #2 tio 4E4 t` ,)i MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 Have you ever experienced or been impacted a natural disaster? Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Yes No If you answered Yes, please describe: If "yes", please explain: 58.3% 4L7% Number If you answered Yes, please describe: 1 Tornado and flooding in Austin, Texas 2 Hurricane Celia and Carla and other minor hurricanes. H1N1 Pandemic 3 Hurricane Allen 4 Flooding, strong winds, tornadoes, drought hurricanes, extreme temperature 5 Every time it rains a significant amount the neighborhood goes underwater 7 5 5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 3 1 If" ,n Question #3 »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»„»�,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, How concerned are you about the possibility ofyour community i impacted by a natural disaster yet Concerned 4) Answer Options Extremely Concerned Somewhat Concerned Not Concerned Extremely Concerned 66.67% i8 Response Percent Response Count 66.7% 8 33.3% 4 0.0% 0 answered question skipped question Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 4 1 If" ,n 12 0 Question #4 RI „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 ease select the natural hazard you ti I presents the HIGHESThryour neig borhood. Windstorm ,„ .67% 100 uuuuuuuuiiluuuuuuuuuuuuiuuuuuuuuuuuuiiluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui ooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooli 11111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111vivi 7 Hlaruricanu a xplcal Storm Answer Options Severe Wind Drought Extreme Temperature Flood Hailstorm Hurricane/Tropical Storm Windstorm Lightning Tornado Wildfire Severe Winter Storm Earthquake k Flood 41.67% Response Percent Response Count 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4L7% 5 0.0% 0 4L7% 5 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 5 1 If" ,n Question #5 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Please select the natural hazard you thunk represents the SECOND HIGHEST threat your neighborhood Severe Winter Storm 8.33'4 (1) Tornado 16.67,y (2) Windstorm 43,67% (2) Extreme Temp a tune 8.33% „pi )111,1.,.1,1,1,1)).,11,1)11,1,1,1,1,1,1,V111111111111Ifill 111111111111111111119 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111010 Flood 16.,67% (2) IHurr issue Storm p Answer Options Response Response Percent Count Severe Wind 0.0% 0 Drought 0.0% 0 Extreme Temperature 8.3% 1 Flood 16.7% 2 Hailstorm 0.0% 0 Hurricane/Tropical Storm 33.3% 4 Windstorm 16.7% 2 Lightning 0.0% 0 Tornado 16.7% 2 Wildfire 0.0% 0 Severe Winter Storm 8.3% 1 Earthquake 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 6 1 If" ,n Question #6 IIMINIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIIMINIMMIMINIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIIMIMINIMMUMNIMMUMMUMEOMMIMMIMMIMMIMMIMMIMMIM212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121.1.01.01MEOMMIZMI12121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121,2 Is there another natural hazard not listed above that you think represents wide- scale threat r neighborhood? Lt yes, please explain: 11 11 o I Yes No Iff you answered Yes... Answer Options 9.09% 18.118% 72.73% O% 1O% 20% 30% 4O F5 50% 60% 70% 8O% 90% 100% Yes No If you answered Yes, please describe. If yes, please explain: Number If you answered Yes, please describe. 1 Brush fires no hydrant 2 Water contamination My lack of proper drainage Response Response Percent Count 9.1% 1 72.7% 8 18.2% 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 7 1 If" ,n Question #7 IIMIN1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11,11.1.1.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.1MMIMMIMMIMMIM212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121PIMMIMMIMMIZOMMIMMUMMUMIN1212121212121212121212121212121.1MMIMMIMMIMMIZOMMIMMUMMUMMUMMUUM121212121212121EMNIZOMMIMMIMMIZOMMIMMUMMUMMUMMUMMUMMUMMMI No 33+33 Answer Options Yes No I'm not sure s your M info Morn. me locate in a floodplahi? Yes 58.337 7) Response Response Percent Count 58.3% 7 33.3% 4 8.3% 1 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 8 1 If" ,n Question #8 111.1.1.1.11,11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.1.MINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMIN1212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121211221212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121,2 Do you have fl I'm not 16474 (2) ood insurance?' la:.ta sage real 2 f,'.3k pl',1,c01'.; 0, 41.67% (5). Answer Options Ye 41.67% 0) Response Response Percent Count Yes 41.7% 5 No 41.7% 5 I'm not sure 16.7% 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 91Page Question #9 111.1.1.1.11,11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.1.MINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMIN1212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121211221212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121,2 I you do not have flood insurance, why not? Answered: swinped 0% 10% 20% 30% 400j 50% 60% 70% 800/0 90% 100% am not located in the floodplain. Flood insurance Lis too expensive. Flood insurance is not necessary because my location never floods. Flood insurance is not necessary because 1 am elevated or otherwise protected. 1111111111111111111111111 1 have never considered flood insurance. I have flood insurance.. Answer Options I am not located in the floodplain. Flood insurance is too expensive. Flood insurance is not necessary because my location never floods. Flood insurance is not necessary because I am elevated or otherwise protected. I have never considered flood insurance. I have flood insurance. Response Response Percent Count 10.0% 1 40.0% 4 0.0% 0 20.0% 2 0.0% 30.0% 3 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 10 1 Question #10 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Have you taken any actions to ah your home or nei'hborhood more resistant to nature hazar s? Vfi Answer Options Yes No If you answered Yes, please describe: What have you done? 41,67% 1 Response Response Percent Count 4L7% 5 58.3% 7 2 Number If you answered Yes, please describe: 1 Windows 2 Applied for FEMA grant but was denied Grant through Nueces County That was reallocated Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 11 1 If" ,n Question #11 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Are you interested I k neighborhood more .s hazards? No 33 n"i your hoFile or nt natural 91,67! Answer Options Response Response Count Percent Yes 9L7% 11 No 8.3% 1 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 12 1 If" ,n Question #12 MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 What is the most effect ve way for you to receiveormation about how to make your home and neighborhood more resistant to natural hazards? Public wo ksh,op &a 41.67% (5) Answer Options to rotql News «% N ,11,1,1,1,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 fr ° °"PJPJIIIIIINW11fi uuu1 // a uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Newspaper Television Radio Internet Mail Public workshops/meetings School meetings Mall 16.67% (2) Television 16.67% (2) Internet 113.67% (2, Response Response Count Percent 8.3% 1 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 16.7% 2 41.7% 5 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 13 1 If" ,n Question #13 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 In your opinion, what are some steps your local government could take to reduce or eliminate the risk of future natural hazard damages in your neighborhood? Fuli llic Education &... Safe Shelters Strengthen Building... Other (please specify) Answer Options 8.33®f 16.67% 33.33% 66.67% 0% 10% 2.0% 30% 40% 50% 60,% 70% 880% 90% 100% Response Response Count Percent Public Education & Awareness 66.7% 8 Safe Shelters 8.3% 1 Strengthen Building Codes/Requirements 33.3% 4 Other (please specify) 16.7% 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 14 1 Ii" ,n Question #14 MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 What other issues regarding the reduction of risk and loss associated with natural hazards or disasters in the community do you find important? Number Response Text 1 Resources available to the public 2 Citizens Corp so neighbors can help each other as resources will be difficult to reach everyone in a timely manner. 3 Having a plan in place is important 4 Awareness of the possibility 5 Public information & educational material distribution 6 Help from local government 7 Safety precautions on industrial row 8 Reduction and flood and windstorm insurance costs Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 15 1 If" ,n Question #15 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 A number of community -wide activities can reduce the risk from natural hazards. In general, these activities fall into one of the following six broad categories. Please tell us how important you think each one is for your community to consider pursuing. Prevention AdImli nistlratV,,.. Pro pe Protection s we red 112 SkIIPPeci Natural Resource... Structural Projects Emergency Services Publiic. E c!ucati on an... D% 110°,o 20°',`o 30% 4O0 50'% 60% 70% 80% 90% 140%°o Very porta it �� Somewhat Ilrportant Not Important Answer Options Prevention - Administrative or regulatory actions that influence the way land is Very Somewhat Not Response Important Important Important Count 10 2 0 12 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 16 1 If" ,n developed and buildings are built. Examples include planning and zoning, building codes, open space preservation, and floodplain regulations. Property Protection - Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings to protect them from a hazard or removal 7 5 0 12 from the area. Examples include acquisition, relocation, elevation and structural retrofits. Natural Resource Protection - Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses, also preserve or restore the functions of 11 1 0 12 natural systems. Examples include floodplain protection, habitat preservation, and riparian buffers. Structural Projects - Actions intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by modifying the natural progression of the hazard. Examples include dams, levees, seawalls, detention/retention basins, channel modification, retaining walls and storm sewers. 10 2 0 12 Emergency Services - Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after an event. Examples 10 1 0 11 include warning systems, evacuation planning, and protection of critical emergency facilities or systems. Public Education and Awareness - Actions to inform citizens about hazards and the techniques they can use to protect 12 0 0 12 themselves and their property. Examples include outreach projects, library materials and demo events. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 17 1 P a Question #16 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, 1ZOM IMMIM12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns? Answer Options Response Count 4 Number Response Text 1 Invite citizens to participate in exercises and drills that would impact their communities. Hands on is an efficient way to learn how to help in disasters. 2 none 3 We have limited drainage, no fire hydrants, no medical emergency clinics, no drinking water in some areas, 4 FEMA and Nueces county failed to provide assistance for the last three major disasters we had. The reason they failed to provide assistance is because we had flood and wind insurance. But the flood and wind insurance would only cover a small percentage of our loss which exceeded $20,000 +. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 18 1 If" ,n Question #17 If you would like to receive additional updates and notifications related to the multi jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plana please enter your email address below. Answer Options Response Count 7* * Personal emails were omitted from these results for privacy. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 19 1 P a Pmi rim 1111111111 I 11111111 i �m poll � etpum 1 I Public Announcements 2 Kickoff Planning Meeting Invitation, January 4, 2017 5 Kickoff Meeting Sign -In Sheets, January 4, 2017 6 Kickoff Meeting PowerPoint Presentation, January 4, 2017 8 Webinar Meeting, March 3, 2017 12 HMAP Natural Hazards Ranking Sheet 13 Mitigation Action Workshop, March 29, 2017 14 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 1 1 If" ,n Public Announcements C4Insty Muu1 Harm Attic ha ittrt Ihtie ielotrir ft ONO ether. Com t „whew' , thothoptott or Jnih* s, or to totog toottrogy:',Agitt tttoo, ottIO *tot' 1°414°4'4 kotatiM tptmaittooke55555 55lit40055titthltt tlikotgkottow ttota hytrolottp trnotapIrtttY11,,Attiot ittakiltwit4 1.160 leitttkl14 oora 'Pet hoh555r 5541mo %moot homes 'Cho 0,4%44,4 $tv hao die htottettomitt oto retpoot ,prt, iNgs,A40 N, 14** tioN, NINNIMPANi pkotigNIN INNINNINNNt 0,104 AroNNONNttegN, Not& titto gotaitogtogot ' ,roro or bane mom* tooryw, r, prit, ogehok ir-toopmethd Photo,* Chevy, too ewe oln 4,41„ Pec*,„ Baem Chou* P „ Pon ,;Usteht, hod Iteetevoti ;,„„. 'tt; 4 Of 701 ,,,re CAVA attn, AfOlfoffroft Vpo Anttvt. „ad Plact htotootet lb* Cheap, „tattl ratratto , rtztt/entat ibex ; „got* to ott „Art o; Atth PtettA; pox t ; Vez.ie; ttetzottte. AO4Oftliff* itOtM , Moo Int to& otht Oh tett ;„, had ast0rome= „etc plethom tot tirio *VI., ti,argt leave tot ttigtt 55555554 155 ttikt, 5 5547 1555155 Ma, pith Awl' 7 ottet tot, tetheio Att theca, so hem hoe top 7 -hoot thot difoOkool logforegiomo of totoolio., 1004 kmao, floRooOhgoof111155555555555 rof tpe,o. of 04 740401,1 CO fikofffoo Off ooffookot $ Attitalkitte liNtota ' • t Att/ 1455555515544 4555555/5544 5541555511555554 ritiftitPtIgAlt 4114titil1 ntttlIftet tkovort, 55455y551 55515455 54 ttirotptOt poo.„‘tom 55555555555 1555555555555515555511555555 „toote hoottmotto NO' ' 04t00f555555 555555000016 ttrt port 4 77,40,44400,4 Pittiotott 4 Pew Itt;ottoto, rttotttorn, ItttAtiltt 5555555 555555554I51 15445555555555555SSSSOnCLAN 5555555*455555545 55ItApittpetttoolf 515551 551*55155 tto4rmott.thilutt 0g0010.414011! t9ttlf 111191004444 trltdONAPINANtit0016000045550000* trovisowem p000554 onOt000ffoo ote theusettent sod death ate tramethe; Pecettor 4/15555.55:5544455544.4 :Agog), pe=4 t4445545s041 4404re55. CA*, t et rept VolcS4r:O. 4415545444445455.Paz* Luxe: hem toe 0040:55'•4554 .02455 hOor toJ, leave fob moo 15O ; ittewir irg argil thoototoot Ago:go bp! togorttos 04 ret totteetoet 45415514 55* Noon too Kowa; foo/fro : 4455w4),o4515.4i trot to wawa oat progoott Ottotgoof 'too& ood *tot p44fOOOtos ffogrAf fintfOOMM IfttofiffOX4 Peeht hteetteres ftrifti55555555444 04=0/44: Velf gtOtOr 551151445511 Pf WO& 1155555tItHI t15t55555/55555 helot, pteittstit Ittot titahrt .e.eistotote„ Vothamett mot* litet 55*4454455l55-44 55555 5545 5555 51 155454444 tt$ efacrf, VOW 1511541 4444445555 r*Oft. ' felfectON "Ofolthfitg= boot dot roe to rotors, 5554455445555 45* At .Stot tWo,:iff 541 551 5555 tVor, 0044 110 140 CAM(55 tOttporoo flax mom 444551555, "f* soot fo ghee* Pentelsoott „P 6544515 tar atO OP/040104 e4544"1440. ttog fOri ffifO fort:hot', /1554s 5515, k0000dlo mo.f ,00t.goo* oifomo 45r, fookfolo 'W0000di 5144555, titiktki "woo etheo S95554 hottott. NOW.* r,Hi4i AWL MO& moot 16.0 544 455455445551 15555: :tvt, 44p4*55 , offi Wino IMIttabtia 55t*4554455 t1stt#40/41Wtte,:105514r,14, tigtPtt [451501551 55455 s45554554544%15549454 554l goototooto ssss4 tgottog rot .10;4.4* ogitoottpotoot awl fat tooloto pitgt togeof oot tee' SfOolfoff tioor *it :55.5, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 2 1 P g FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Contact! Janine Ellington LAN Engineer111 (713) 821-0264 December 19, 2016 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Meet January 4, 2017 Nueces County will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, January 4, 2017 to gather public input for a EWA,. Action Plan,. or Fan. Plan participants IfliCLIde uninc:orporated Nueces Countythe Cities of .Agua Dulce Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, Petroniia, Fon Aransas, and Robstown, as well as the Pon of Corpus Christi Authority. The meeting iiis from 3:00 -5: p.rn. at Nueces County Cdmmissioners Court Chambers, 901 Leopard, Corpus Christi, TX 79401. The public, area businesses and organizations located throughout the planning area are invited and encouraged to attend.: Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000,, the Federal Emergency Management Agency {FEMA) requites communities to develop a mitigation plan to minimize or eliminate the Olong-term risk to human life and property from known hazards. Mitigation is defined by FEMA as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and properly from hazards and their effects. Hazards that may , a risk and potentially result in a disaster include drought flood, hurricane, tornado, wildfire, and :other high hazards. Communities with a FEMA -approved Plan are elble for certain grant funding under the Hazard Mitigation Assis nce (HMA) program to fund critical projects such as Buyouts and Structural Elevation of repetitive flood loss structures, drainage projects„ and hardening critical facilities to minimize future dam.ite from natural disasters that affect the County planning area. The purpose of the public meeting is to provide a project overview from LAN., consultant to the project, and solicit information from citizens. Public input will help the Planning Team to identifY and analyze potential hazards affecting residents and recommend possible actions to reduce their impact throughout Nueces County and the planning area. Detailed information albout the planning process. can be obtained by contacting Janine Ellington, Project Manager, at (713) ,or jeeltinalonajlan-incicom Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 3IPage FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Janine Ellington LAN lEngineering l713I 821-0264 January 3,2017 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Public A n nouncement & Kickoff January 4, 2017 A public meeting on Wednesday, January 4, 2017 to gather pucic input for a FEMA Mitigation Action Plan, or Pian. The litulti-Jurisdictional Plan participants include unincorporated areas of Nueces County, the Cities of Agua Dulce, Bishop, Corpus Christ, Dnscoli, Petronilla, Port Aransas, and Robstown, as well as the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. The meeting is at 3p.m., at Nueces County Commissioners Court, 901 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX 70491., The public, area businesses and organizations located throughout the planning area are invited and encouraged to attend.. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the Federal lErriergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires communities to develop a mitigation plan to minimize or eliminate the longterm risk to human life and property from known ha.zardls. Mitigation is defined by FEMA as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects,. Hazards that may pose a risk and potentially result in a disaster include drought, flood, hurricane, tornado, wildfire„ and other high nazard8... Communities with a FEMA -approved Plan are eligible for certain grant, 'funding under the Hazard Mitigation Assisr.nce (HMA) program to fund critical projects such as Iluyouts and Structural Elevation of repetitive flood loss, structures, drainage projects, and hardening critical facilities to minimize future damage from natural disasters that affect the County panning area. The puroose of the public meeting is to provide a project overview from LN, consultant to the project, and solicit information from citizens. Public input will help the Planning Team to iii-ntify and analyze potential hazards affecting residents and recommend possible actions to reduce their impact throughout Nueces County and the planning area Detailed information about the panning process can be obtained by c Janine Eilington„ Projlect Manager, at (713) ,,or jedingtor *an-inc.corn tatting Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 41Page Kickoff Planning Meeting Invitation, January 4, 2017 1144 11 tll...,1111111,E"1111"Y tll...111111.1...""11"111......111.1..111'ii1111!;111:111111(.:-111"111 IMA111.1... 111..-111)41A111,iL111)\'c 11"0 111"111"1111:°1.""111"1110 IN E:'"'111.....,,I!'"u:,..111,14 11(111(:1111Cio'::.") 1111111411`111"11"111E Nueces County is sponsoring a Kickoff meeting in conjunction with the development of a Multi -jurisdictional FEMA Mitigation Action Nan, or Mon. Participating project partners forming the core Planning Team include unincorporated Nueces County, the Cities of Agua Dulce, Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, IPetronila, Port Aransas, and Robstown„ as well as the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. The goal of the Plan is to minimize or eliminate the long-term risk to1human life and property from known hazards. Upon FEMA approval of the Plan, Nueces County, and the participating entities listed above will be eligible for certain FEMA Hazard Mitigation, Assistance (HMA.) grant funds to implement cost-effective mitigation projects in their local jurisdiction and Nueces County. LAN Engineering, project consultant, will be facilitating the meeting. Please make every effort to attend this important meeting. Strong leadership from Planning Team Members throughout the planning process is critical; therefore, key department personnel and community officials from both Nueces County and the participating jurisdictions are required to attend workshops, assess hazard risk, create mitigation .strategies, involve the. public, and adopt the local Plan. A public meeting to provide outreach and an overview of the project to the general public will be held on: DATE: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 TIME: 3:00 — 5:00 p.m. LOCATION: Nueces County Commissioners Court Chambers 9,01 Leopard Corpus Christi, TX If you have questions or wall not be able to attend., please contact Janine ElIllington by phone at 71.3s, 821-0264 or by ernaN at nro 1-inc.com or Christopher IBoyce by ennaill at Christopherboycern nuecesco„ tom Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 51Page Kickoff Meeting Sign -In Sheets, January 4, 2017 tot. Coolly 144:410,014d0,41140, 1110241kr6 Pt mon Kir:11,40 Worityhop„ Corittuoi, C J),nrwroury 2117 IE Title AgonePhono y 6 1 , „ y r j tr,1,1;,pr14 r' ,' 14 P'Tga,a,giagoggaggag,i,a,,,pag; /1 j,9 iga":„.?6,1aga Pa:PT rY,1„ ;„,',,4,,e 14l41414 4, ,4 „ 444 r 1P,„4g„,,114;-4 14(e;,;;J;:a, V 14 ilea; a;Ao ) k Jw.4;1111,fils,„.„ tia,kPg.,T;;;;;;,2;;;Tagat, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 61Pag (.2; hushes Cissihni 4144Mistisidististith NC ism 'so Amoral MIMI hisSion meting, Mitiolisim Chrsm, TX PU UC MEETING January 4,, 21)1 1 EurpJ ,4 ,lActot, , )4(44„ eliztc+, coo, , Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 71Page Kickoff Meeting PowerPoint Presentation, January 4, 2017 pU'YrI�11� 9�v�iii�i�N@4�u➢; 4 �u I�v"OO �wu�M M/Or ll,Vey 0 4 Orn *g4444x4w✓ 4 4,w 444'ti4"N4k�1�4 4YW4'm'rar.Yl t�' � „,¢na1 IV rM4 4404 ae;✓4 4W41 'h0 14 NIryPm, �kga14 40forrm4 040000000 re pomp „.. ty4444440 400004 r"r 07000 01400 00040,044, 4* 0 9 Jn 4 44414d4u4�44@ 008/14M,0400 6044 140441"ON,'t44N C4004400* 4004*. Val? rOfM'4",1O402010* 440n4404O14;. O ti( M1G;yf arm,81r ✓ 41 Y1 AP V 4 P gVk4hryw o1/4 ru a 11 z >J r I ;m � 4 i 1✓ U9 H k. r'4 /!lrld✓ow,M 5.,4 I r>r %OW* VAANION. ,O,O,,r,Orrw; M2 mgr, ,r,e,4 Nsrr ti ✓ yr at>ti. 4,44,4 �w.m 11 Mannino .Putpose feerdi4m 440.0W er0000a 4�4W4)440'4g p4,rt. um201:00,r , elerrereorgeo 4000441.4 4,,0444 41 oogooroo Amon 4r'G4ra WII, u0 01,044 M� 41a4>4r r4 f4ro,,,K0 u4 boots itolO rvm property Oar 0 epe bm 0001 .000* 00010,0 000410 IT u*mom th,t004 400040w100;44 A'T44om4U"q, 1100 tu1>''0 4 140011Pre Co4400p 000040440. PEVCodex; 440,044,44 404001m 4,Ia a *****4111,4 04 4 I;), "Air 4w 4014 a 4s a 41440 ¢OAP Y as •,01 1M441I,i 0040044r,0444 ran 1v44r104 0,44 o m,rr 141 4 4e rOoloolo ", I WV, "Igo "Nov bAOUT,O k, 4'I"a4"4'T4 woo** u "Om r !Rr 0.490.0,5 r'No4944,,4 44 voosch 01 4 rew re or* i, or°4 Woo 0,044, 4441444 0,04 4408.41*** 44 C 4*0 44' ,4 00400014010 **44444 14'a7m4**4 M1 w4. 4,4 14iV b4 INA 41447444 9910 Iw4NIV4414,4 r44Om0. ,41110 1r,O44MY41O Ib,µr O"%,4rr; Thom" mof 144 g +awcVrlml tor,r,74"a4" 04"0"0"o, µ4t 4�CxO4 0744444 .14 the 44!440 u.14 44 Orr1* deC***404 44M Epr mr44,4i444 9,m 4 m`u4 4°x4441 *map p44rm4rn4 er mown 4m *ENO 040.0 r 4 *r41hvs4y o 4mti41u✓4i4 410 oroducov 4.4m4.ak 44acVar p mom w°ba4w441rr4Rm`m040,9 M 644'% 44'i4411,;orya'mrW'11'a"4w'1.""r'44'Y'tN^4'°s/ 100044144 14 rr4 , 0144**** P Plamining .40.41400 4140040100, . 114pIp44 WIG0.MA>m au 4 ply° h nn ikatiftiot1a Jr(1m4or4u 444404w r4H` 14'44.4009 4tv414r " 44n au1IW4Ni4. fast✓ 0404 rml 4v:ropy, 04 1 4 1 iC40 N IO0i1414 „ p „ro( ;WO. &NS pr rVe G4 l M4 eer44 u4 Ir, T 4r Cn'4 0440441010 Tau004 44,d 4,445. tiatiatllang 0701014+4 • IL4ID mw'4141 r4 G'Y�644rt744 pn�m WA, to*COO 414 yolortyryhn Hu1ig Inl " I .' ,r , ,r�t,a4 +,r ,r, 0,4,40 oloKINow. ,rf/rt v) X>,A.m a WW1, ✓,FQg f, xirr/9,9,riii/'�M , d•r >s,A n✓ .R(rr / r rc' 47'04 �r4wi44. 4°�Ms4MnrM: +ry romuO4, Motto toreO✓4 Iw'44O, 000094 4,;; 000wrarmlw Welter Weer Ik,e40"`p✓0444 drr444414 1"414,44 40044040, IMPm'4i44t14'. 0000000m yoreto 4 V'4 w, 4',M.yee+po we!d etroo040403400 40 prowl mom. 1445040 A1444O144 r"M 0***0m W4464,1r(mf"4,4 114414ed vela flys toprd pop, to V4M,144r o,„w promo poppc brow 744 cr44 4n 40140,04 4114`mm4mpre re5w' 00 40440000 14440044N4444rea,a4tere er poop, po44 Oslor oleo 40 rperrypop 0000404 poem 4144 4u 44,1 f'w 1044 40400 0000000 tom moll), b40645, orproevy 4tmamrrm4 rdra409 0,4y04c.144", toodpeoriklg Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix C 8 1 IP a "Tioaso me on tom rot toormozo diutrop *V POWS Wel mew pfowoo ot relly Ito knew** elflk llande arid #11140" CereMi. td wetland* noeleasede WOO* r000mrog 0000tabk oNd view.% to oodi,aco mace and pfmcionnito rodoneleadel lelleeelee00 aeol1 l 11 tI 00000led ao woo sokot so - Atiqtkotillm04 .44.4 vA,110 iffttoft IPI/N. WON ol die anonnal ' dew nowedownow node*, */* dowoad do *wool 11 4P* 0,000.4101ell VVA 11,41 eko• rirbog INVA..9),61W(deV,,, fincorrnragew,V, ovfi, nr.,can.,1,M0 t Vitt ttettlt MIP,1010, 'tat, 0,6%,%.! ftet ,t,t1tOtttttft %Mt! % tat OA ppokyo.%%"' %off;' 4,310 ' ir6V, gM14,01500,01 11,0,007,9 1;30 Jfi,I!,,,,AVAY 40000014 vv, Re 'Retbard NNW 0MIMMIIMIVINNIUMOMINVIM f.01 1.0,41,/ .00410. r4.50,41 rootttt 'dorm WY PAW. .1.4,41.00.. Ott arenttetree .WavAlmoOkoomp om Noma. 0.0 MA, HAMA WV` A I tinvatedITOrteMte 4,,,N4114, MAU ttt Art tate )10 . tAtttorto 0, A AA A AAJAAAAAJ „ PAT MAAAAAA0 IVAAAAAAAA 4.0 ktket,,4 t% Attl,00,4 4,,40,94001kit ,11 1 izitication, and Awercness TIN014)111 liNOut11 $1,1 albtrA Old edtdeAte *OW dlalaa nen" Sod eanotallai wind el 1 PIO" EN oonooko owNodi poops f,;m1 mgmebe randeed allennaloon 041,41,f0 dlearalate owner* el hAZVOIOOrri. VEAL, 00,440r9 roO/40014, 011. 11 P1 Avremot1 11 111of toloorote w,,,ogoo atm,1 111 I111 needy P11 11 Aravo 1,94to ermeecre Amer Pmecams 11 AAAAA,,A.A Ro4s,11, resibilliti WWWWWIIIIMMIIWWWWWWWIMIM PIA! 1 gw.:"0,5v rams.:0%azo Pop pgro,4,0 6A4 5.9,999999 "0.4,10,41. otttt%tt Ittttatt% Ott, .Ott, ft to% motottAt. f tat, ttottettit, tttett, rtztt, ttytt Ottet tt,,1 ,ttntettt [N,tvd f pm, 'it, Ott, %OA Trttek Ottott,,,t, . Itty, trfottkt, tut, %,,tilottlttott, %ttt tttrAttt i6(41060644.006M.144000,1tlirn AAAVAAAA :N.leAVOOA Ittealglor6 12.41 -mm. liddlalled Number o n Abeam FAO., APOWAWACA MAW' ago"yzo, A AApAAAAAAAPAAAP Nov,: or w%,,,,,c46r% 0%,%Amoor, %.,ofa,,,,,e ttte ettAtttf, tAttttAttt ttotttrtt,. to, kAAIIRKWAAA4KA RAAAAAAAI frA, AAA AAAVAAAA, .999K. 999 14991990)99999., moat owm, tg tot ottoro, .1104 go.ej • 41U 11999/99,9499.,99 fr ,MPIPM.Pg Of WO a."50,4„0, 699,, 9 999.9999 ,AA Mr, 'IA ONNIANN On kj Pubbe, Owitooth e.rvA4r,,'4,61z4r4 111 1111 '60^4e 114P ootron.y ebo,ro on low' mo; 11 11ri:61d0 irfkosMICO r$4,A Ckmo,14100 Rt* eel* TYWNIUNA 1444dAl gLIV%. AtAg 10!1114ei raor al too NINA tfOt, • p%elea 11",NII1 Amu pit* A 9,1,6oc sande link wevat 14u,10. viong • MoIV 0,14 r4ru P010 11'4, 1444 A Oft tA,444 '114 nolo' oil ovo444444 Next 54 WWWIMMIMMININIMMINIUNIONNWINIVRINVIM NOM 4110 *VA ttittlir; tttt,,,6 tstotttart %%Kt ott, , !tt,toftett t% ONO '9099994. 999,99, 9999,99990919 109,99.99999 999, 999,.99 A,AA, AA., AAA. ,AAA 44,1, %OA to,tottto ,74 ''1110,1111,1V, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 91Page HMAP City Council PowerPoint Presentation ■ MAP Plan Plepttitt trettrtytttyt tot Molt Iyyt.tY,'P++ot AttotttAchtyy Plat ittOt Otto 'it ,a ..t of I'Moe9a' 7r Mae trims to toy wt.. pt./tett ° gd,"tyyytto v1%dttyy,y tot attgatort QC'oItatto�°J littotettito Ito putt: Mourding Arm UrfrhuraMI,V0494 mmycyv tourty,,hootCyst%tt Mrr4W tttstet, Stow, Como.Crop, C! °" wed as M61tPtrttiM`r,,^tJNttut ChttrYttatt.tt g#wwr1i T are. t,wrq ottutt t'att olitt tyttbetttetto Ott Mom t /4k DA0444,114 4' WMW dM11a01tg Ire: ',MW. MCV M gFs t,vct,;aark PALM, 6Y o e,, RL n,wWd Ph > t,Mm'W tet ctekrqb a,W'W " V XiW aNuu1 h"Watom ttot tat Noy ettortm00, **Mon lul 11 prdfaau 1 MMl*+N tlr,'w 0.01 4,9100 Wal wr OPOV F440,4 Po Vvp11 4 ,r11 $ 0,60,4 vfll y uP,w' w e"."4"0"01400 'wed t v 01141, if1 a 6INAu4ly Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 10 1 P a phase CR- HazartlARtait Artol0ta hkattay tittural: Nunn* ha RA* AnolVos P,froa. PGSVIOS trt 09 hatcr,ca ot,tAAMMah% 010000,4 440,001013*, ;IrfablObbtt the katao, 4444 141444044, 4440*rj. 04), 0404044 ard 0144 944044 'No 4rM700016 4)44440.11444,71, Oft 'MN" taka get gum egoogaigo if,gages. Loogb Importing 44 diatonte tweet* hetata011114 tofgtainatbV huord talk fl Strirt kont ggeouggogo Ard10... 71,40,111..10.4. , [441/2/4/446)44/41 04,0, WA, reapapaPPAPPaVI.fr aff, PU., 40941 011.J00041,40,44 ongoing Public Cant ach E00000000 tiazt0100, grogglaga what Igo ,oggnaggt, 1444 doll ,te Mae tmaaa *ad Woode 94thSrr tht 449444 COV,Oraf I9/4,1400 fiatatigt, 44/4144911 pagtg moat** eaelovtilop .944449444441 IhOV 410,4n,,,,41 rpotol galgVtita fljj attolat HUM t I( Ow bog Numb r Ortogat0on 0 008 ,00, 044/ 40.00,0 4060.0. weolv AVA.,;44 papa604,,P /4441 94/4 4'..V 4*/04,0604, cffixe ,Awd 1444 44 powipapp KA/44<, 4 444/ 7/44414/44/4 /94)6944) 7)41 /612Igete/2000.`,4 '/14///441/1)4911/4444444/4$6 V00,1101 '446/6/491..1 *OW., 41/4 4,4450 *lea, asponsiblittlies - -1- - geatitge 4,4)7/P„,,w9 wofle..0 0'0,00+ 44)„11144441, „1/4)4264 We, f. 0001Mr Onw41,,41.7o.,6,7 [,,,VVYAM fAV1/,71, 31,0 9 OM 14 Iota , 01011 NWT, 14104:” 44 4/4/414/44l9 44111/74/444 o 41444/4/44/1444/49194, e9l0*4/4,44 01,1wrio4,0 44444444 Mica 4 f00 4/4494411 VAKegmo 400010 ONIONIPMS011 climatta 00 karma co, owof 9440/44 4Afitte41 PN.tit froily VI4 ir04****6044 40Pia 11/4l447111o44104 ova ,t,oriproy gotott ointiN 6,14: Pima* - tANOthatatatpain OtiOtt 44,,I44e44494/49/4o7/44f 49.0 Ir 44,06, 44144)4' /441 Piorw 144 VV,, 1/946,444104 /,,a4914,00, 4te0 Melhagarh TOM 19/7449 1 00..0 444 e,44'2414/14944 rrf, OM. e,40 14104000 1,06AAV 194/1441 pp, pop, a, PPOPJAPP 1004900 4494/4,',,,iVinV044 radeidaegoff a'f, /NAVA add I44/rpo9M46 OA, %ffAdjn, PO4.,1,014e4 VAig. 01,,0,0 V4..011 owl C *Mad 44/ /9 CI,M• PPOpPe MPP,SPXP• 4414//41414444/444449/i/4// 4/4/4911014 .342 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 11 1 P a g 02! Webinar Meeting, March 3, 2017 Ii1011.001 X1111611���«�0`11Ill,,,,,,,,,�y� ���1��������� 01 gIIIIIIIIIII ILII Danielle Hale Tak Makino Christopher Boyce Janine Ellington Scott Harris Tom Mylett Yvette Dodd Rick Adams Ricardo Gonzalez 1111.' ,,,,,,µyy""MMll;M111ii1 IIImmIIIIIpp uqu`�III ��umuumm �'1'111�IIIII �yll�llll�llll IIIIIIIIII ILII ILII III°������������ PCCA LAN Nueces County LAN LAN PCCA Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 12 1 If" a HMAP Natural Hazards Ranking Sheet Pito" ir,:::4101.110ity u 0.),0 rta 00.-Olaz,a orli 004 IHIjatio A et 0 lEin NIHudD 11 a ta rids OF? a 011 r10 S het,A NOTE::: This. is. :not: et techrlical exercise_ Results WiN be compiled end included in the. Risk Assessment: Overview of the Plant. The hazard milking is based on your experience as a, community official or resident of the Nueces County area.: Place a nieskin the appropriate: co/Limn and rcw irditainng level of risk. Consider frequency of occurrence of :each haz.ard welli as :the potential impact When rankihE the haserds. Hazard Not Applicablle tNiA) Low (J Moderate (MI High oil Flloods Hurricane topicall Storm Viiildfire Tornado Drought Coastall Erosion Dam Levee Faure Earthqualkes Etcp,ansVve Soils Eirtreme Heat Hleilstrorm Land Subsidence Severe Winter Storm Windstorms ILlightening Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 13 1 Page Mitigation Action Workshop, March 29, 2017 11,11 001011 1111 mime a uui a uuu a ui[016i uu Ricardo Gonzalez John Montalvo Laura Casset Danielle Hale Christopher Boyce Tak Makino Yvette Dodd Scott Harris Nicole Boyer Janine Ellington Billy Delgado Rick Adams tititir"ti��w11�444tititir���� IW411,�,,,,,1111�»Il��llluuuuuo 1111111 u�i�ui��u�m�o m��m uu a huu' �V ������yyyyyytiploou,,,,,�� p6 Iliulplo i IIIIIIIIV u Robstown LAN LAN PCCA Nueces County LAN Corpus Christi LAN Port Aransas LAN Corpus Christi Port Aransas Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 14 1 If" a '1111111@ 11111111 !!i!!llld,�lli!!lill � 1111111111111111111,1,1 , \\SIM AIS 11 NUECES COUNTY CRITICAL FACILITI . Emergency Operation Center(s) NUECES COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 901 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 EMS Station NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 6 City Hall Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTW ON, TEXAS 78380 Hospital(s) NUECES COUNTY HALO FLIGHT 1843 FARM TO MARKET ROAD 665, CORPUS CHRISTI 78411 County Courthouse NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE 901 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 Fire Stations NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 1 BANQUETTE FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #4 BLUNTZER FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #4 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #2/ NC ESD #1 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #3/ NC ESD #1 5241 CO RD 73 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 SH44 AND 2ND ST. BANQUETTE, TEXAS 78339 666 AND FM 624, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS 70380 5242 CR 73, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 3879 CR 61, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Airport BISHOP MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NUECES COUNTY AIRPORT CR 77 AND FM 3354, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 3983 WINGS DR, ROBSTOWN, TX 78380 Community Centers BANQUETTE COMMUNITY CENTER 4359 4TH ST BANQUETTE, TEXAS 78339 Schools LONDON ISD LONDON H 5 LONDON ISD LONDON EL AGUA DULCE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL BISHOP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS DRISCOLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -CAMPUS BANQUETTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT- SCHOOL CAMPUS 1306 FM 43 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 1306 FM 43 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 1 LONGHORN DR, AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 719 E 6TH ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 410 WEST AVE. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 2391 COUNTY ROAD 47, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 4339 4TH ST BANQUETTE, TEXAS 78339 \\SIM AIS 11 CITY OF AGUA DULCE CRITICAL FACILITIES RASSU‘S Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTWON, TEXAS 78380 Police Station(s) AGUA DULCE CONSTABLE PCT. 5/ COUNTY JUSTICE OF THE PEACE 1514 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 70330 City Hall AGUA DULCE CITY HALL 1514 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 70330 Fire Stations AGUA DULCE FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE 1510 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 Community Centers AGUA DULCE COMMUNITY CENTER 1513 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF AGUA DULCE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Schools AGUA DULCE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL 1 LONGHORN DR. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 County Building CONSTABLE 5 1514 2ND ST AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78410 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 11Page Police Stations) CITY OF BISHOP CRITICAL FACILITIES BISHOP POLICE DEPARTMENT 115 S. ASH. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 City Hall BISHOP CITY HALL 203 E. MAIN ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Fire Stations BISHOP FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 2015 SOUTH PACIFIC, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Airport BISHOP MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CR 77 AND FM 3354, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Community Centers BISHOP COMMUNITY CENTER 102 W JOYCE ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF BISHOP WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT US HWY 77 Bypass Schools BISHOP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS 719 E. 6TH ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 BISHOP CISD BISHOP EL 200 5 FIR BISHOP, Texas 78343 BISHOP CISD BISHOP H 5 100 BADGER LN BISHOP, Texas 78343 BISHOP CISD BISHOP PRI 705 W MAIN ST BISHOP, Texas 78343 BISHOP CISD LILLION E LUEHRS J H 717 E SIXTH ST BISHOP, Texas 78343 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 21Page Emergency Operation Center(s) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITES Nueces County Emergency Operations Center 901 LEOPARD STREET CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401-3606 Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers Shelter agreements are not for shelter in place; they are used post disaster and can be an area of last refuge if needed. Shelter agreements include the following ISO's: CCISD, Calallen, Tuloso Midway, Flour Bluff and West Oso CALALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 4001 WILDCAT DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 DEL MAR COLLEGE 101 BALDWIN, COLES BUILDING, CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas 78404 TULOSO MIDWAY HIGH SCHOOL 2653 MCKINZIE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULOSO MIDWAY 3125 DEER RUN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 County Building CONSTABLE 2 10110 COMPTON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 MCKINZIE JAIL ANNEX 745 N PADRE ISLAND DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78406 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 611 PALM ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER 1630 BROWNLEE BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI , TX 78404 CITY/COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 1702 HORNE RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78416 MEDICAL EXAMINER 2610 HOSPITAL BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78405 CENTRAL GARAGE 201 CORN PRODUCTS RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78409 Community Center HILLTOP COMMUNITY CENTER 11425 LEOPARD ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 Hospital(s) BAYVIEW BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL, A CAMPUS OF CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL 6629 WOOLRIDGE ROAD CORPUS CHRIST, TEXAS 78414 CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI 2606 HOSPITAL BOULEVARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 784051818 CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI SHORELINE 600 ELIZABETH STREET CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 75038 CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI SOUTH 5950 SARATOGA BOULEVARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 5727 ESPLANADE DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 DRISCOLL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL 3533 SOUTH ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 DUBUIS HOSPITAL OF CORPUS CHRISTI 600 ELIZABETH STREET 3RD FLOOR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 75038. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 31Page Hospital(s) (cont.) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITIES (CONT.) POST ACUTE MEDICAL SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF CORPUS CHRISTI 6226 SARATOGA BOULEVARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414-3421 SOUTH TEXAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL 6130 PARKWAY DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - BAY AREA 7101 SOUTH PADRE ISLAND DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412-4913 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - DOCTORS REGIONAL 3315 SOUTH ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411-1820 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - NORTHWEST 13725 NORTHWEST BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - THE HEART HOSPITAL 7002 WILLIAMS DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412-4912 City Hall CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 1201 LEOPARD STREET CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 Fire Stations FIRE STATION 1 514 BELDEN ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 FIRE STATION 2 13421 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 FIRE STATION 3 1401 MORGAN AVENUE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78404 FIRE STATION 4 2338 RODD FIELD RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78414 FIRE STATION 5 2406 LEOPARD STREET, STE 200 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78408 FIRE STATION 6 6713 WEBER RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413 FIRE STATION 7 3750 S STAPLES ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78411 FIRE STATION 8 4645 KOSTORYZ RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78415 FIRE STATION 9 501 NAVIGATION BLVD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78408 FIRE STATION 10 1550 HORNE RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78416 FIRE STATION 11 910 AIRLINE RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78412 FIRE STATION 12 2120 RAND MORGAN RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 FIRE STATION 13 1802 WALDRON RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FIRE STATION 14 5901 S STAPLES ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 41Page Fire Stations (cont.) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITIES (CONT.) FIRE STATION 15 14202 COMMODORE ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FIRE STATION 16 8185 TEXAS 361 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78373 FIRE STATION 17 6869 YORKTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78414 ANNAVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 11551 LEOPARD ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 2 337 YORKTOWN BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78418 Water Treatment Plant O. N. STEVENS WATER FILTRATION PLANT 13014 HEARN RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410-4412 ALLISON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 4001 ALLISON DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 BROADWAY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 1402 W BROADWAY ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 GREENWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6541 GREENWOOD DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 LAGUNA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 201 JESTER ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469 O50 PLANT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 501 NILE DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 WHITECAP WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 13409 WHITECAP BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA5 78469 Power Generating Stations Barney M. Davis Energy Center 4301 WALDRON RD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 Police Station(s) POLICE STATION 321 JOHN SARTAIN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 CALALLEN POLICE SUBSTAION 1925 TULOSO RD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 Schools CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ADKINS MIDDLE 2402 ENNIS JOSLIN RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA5 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ALLEN EL 1414 18TH ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD BAKER MIDDLE 3445 PECAN CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD BARNES EL 2829 050 PKWY CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 Schools (cont.) CORPUS CHRISTI ISD BROWNE MIDDLE 4301 SCHANEN BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CALK EL 4621 MARIE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 51Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL '"", CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CARROLL H 5 FACILITIES (CONT.) 111, 1. 1 5301 WEBER RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CLUB ESTATES 5222 MERGANSER CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI 15D COLES H SAND EDUCATIONAL CENTER 924 WINNEBAGO CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD COLLEGIATE H S 101 BALDWIN, COLES BUILDING, ROOM 201 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CROCKETT EL 2625 BELTON ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CULLEN MIDDLE 5225 GREELY CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CUNNINGHAM MIDDLE 4321 PRESCOTT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD DAWSON EL 6821 SANDERS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD DRISCOLL MIDDLE 3501 KENWOOD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT CTR 6300 OCEAN DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD EVANS SES 1315 COMANCHE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD FANNIN EL 2730 GOLLIHAR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD FAME WEBB EL 6953 BOARDWALK CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GALVAN EL 3126 MASTERSON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GARCIA EL 4401 GREENWOOD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GIBSON EL 5723 HAMPSHIRE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GRANT MIDDLE 4350 AARON DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HAAS MIDDLE 6630 MCARDLE RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HAMLIN MIDDLE 3900 HAMLIN DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HAROLD T BRANCH ACADEMY FOR CAREER & TECHN 3902 MORGAN AVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78405 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HICKS EL 3602 MCARDLE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 61Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL '"", CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HOUSTON EL FACILITIES (CONT.) 111, 1. 1 tililtV 363 NORTON ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD JONES EL 7533 LIPES CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KAFFIE MIDDLE 5922 BROCKHAMPTON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KING H S 5225 GOLLIHAR RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KOLDA EL 3730 RODD FIELD RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 70414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KOSTORYZ EL 3602 PANAMA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD LOS ENCINOS SES 1826 FRIO CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78417 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MARTIN MIDDLE 3502 GREENWOOD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MARY GRETT SCHOOL 4402 CASTENON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MARY HELEN BERLANGA EL 4120 CARROLL LN CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MEADOWBROOK EL 901 MEADOWBROOK CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MENGER EL 2401 S ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MIRELES EL 7658 CIMARRON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MONTCLAIR EL 5241 KENTNER CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MOODY H S 1818 TROJAN DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MOORE EL 6121 DURANT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD OAK PARK SPECIAL EMPHASIS SCHOOL 3801 LEOPARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD RAY H S 1002 TEXAN TRL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ROY MILLER H 5 AND METRO SCHOOL OF DESIGN 1 BATTLIN BUC BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SANDERS EL 4102 REPUBLIC CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SCHANEN ESTATES EL 5717 KILLARMET CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 71Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL SISIXISS '"", CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SHAW SES FACILITIES (CONT.) 111, 1. 1 IIIIIIV 2920 SOLEDAD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78405 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SMITH EL 6902 WILLIAMS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SOUTH PARK MIDDLE 3001 MCARDLE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD TRAVIS EL 3210 CHURCHILL DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD VETERANS MEMORIAL H S 3750 CIMMARRON BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD WILSON EL 3925 FT WORTH CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD WINDSOR PARK Gr 4525 S ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD W OODLAW N EL 1110 W OODLAW N CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD WYNN SEALE METROPOLITAN SCHOOL OF DESIGN 1707 AYERS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD YEAGER EL 5414 TRIPOLI CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ZAVALA EL 3125 RUTH CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78405 CORPUS CHRISTI MONTESSORI SCHOOL 822 AYERS ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 TULOSO MIDWAY HIGH SCHOOL 2653 MCKINZIE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULOSO MIDWAY MIDDLE SCH 9768 LA BRANCH CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULSO MIDWAY INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 1921 OVERLAND TRAIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULOSO MIDWAY PRIMARY SCHOOL 3125 DEER RUN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 CALALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 4001 WILDCAT DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 CALALLEN MIDDLE SCHOOL 4602 CORNETT CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 CALALLEN EAST ELEMENTARY 3709 LOTT AVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 WOOD RIVER ELEMENTARY 15118 DRY CREEK CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 MAGEE ELEMENTARY 4201 CALALLEN DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 81Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITIES (CONT.) WEST OSO HIGH SCHOOL 754 I1 litISU FLATO ROAD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78405 WEST OSO JUNIOR HIGH 5202 BEAR LANE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX78405 WEST OSO ELEMENTARY 1526 CLIGG MAUS DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78416 JOHN F. KENNEDY ELEMENTARY 1102 VILLARREAL CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 76416 FLOUR BLUFF HIGH SCHOOL 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF JUNIOR HIGH 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF INTERMEDIATE 377 HUSTLIN HORNET CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF ELEMENTARY 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF PRIMARY 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 1 mitt Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers CITY OF DRISCOLL CRITICAL FACILITIES 1 ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTWON, TEXAS 78380 Police Station(s) DRISCOLL POLICE DEPARTMENT 210 W. MAIN ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 City Hall DRISCOLL CITY HALL 210 W. MAIN ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Fire Stations DRISCOLL FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 322 MAIN ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Airport BISHOP MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CR 77 AND FM 3354, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Community Centers DRISCOLL COMMUNITY CENTER 200 E. 7TH ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF DRISCOLL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT County RD 79 Schools DRISCOLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS 410 WEST AVE. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 91Page Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 10 1Page CITY OF PORT ARANSAS III CRITICAL FACILITIES Fire Stations NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 1 5241 CO RD 73 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF PORT ARANSAS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Schools PORT ARANSAS ISD BRUNDRETT MIDDLE 100 STA ST PORT ARANSAS, Texas 78373 PORT ARANSAS ISD OLSEN EL 100 STA ST PORT ARANSAS, Texas 78373 PORT ARANSAS I5D PORT ARANSAS H 5 100 STATION ST PORT ARANSAS, Texas 78373 County Building CONSTABLE 4 705 WEST AVE A PORT ARANSAS 78373 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 10 1Page Fire Stations CITY OF PETRONILA CRITICAL FACILITIES SIIISSIS 11111%%1M PETRONILA FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 aSSIV FM 665 AND CR 22, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Schools BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -CAMPUS 2391 COUNTY ROAD 47, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 11 1 IP a ge CITY OF ROBSTOWN CRITICAL FACILITES Emergency Operation Center(s) ROBSTOWN EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 430 EAST MAN AVENUE ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 - 3354 Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTWON, TEXAS 78380 Fire Stations NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 1 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #2/ NC ESD #1 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #3/ NC ESD #1 5241 CO RD 73 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 5242 CR 73, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 3879 CR 61, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Water Treatment Plant NUECES CO WATER DIST #3 Wastewater Treatment Plant ROBSTOWN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT US HWY 77 N BUS (RBST) Community Center ROBSTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER 415 MAINER RD ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Library KEACH FAMILY LIBRARY 1000 TERRY SHAMSIE BOULEVARD ROBSTOWN, TX 78380 County Building CONSTABLE 5 710 E MAIN ST ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ANIMAL CONTROL 4540 FM 392 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 73300 COMMUNITY SERVICES/KITCHEN 415 MAINER RD ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 SOCIAL SERVICES 103 N 6TH ST ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Schools ROBSTOWN ISD HATTIE MARTIN EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER 701 N FIRST ST ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD LOTSPEICH EL 1000 RUBEN CHAVEZ RD ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN 15D ROBERT DRISCOLLJR EL 122 W AVE H ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 70300 ROBSTOWN 15D ROBSTOWN H 5 609 HWY 44 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 70330 ROBSTOWN ISD SALAZAR CROSSROADS ACADEMY 400 W LIGUSTRUM ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD SAN PEDRO EL 800 W AVE D ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD SEALE J H 401 E AVE G ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD SOLOMON P ORTIZ INT 208 E AVE H ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Fire Stations CITY OF PETRONILA CRITICAL FACILITIES SIIISSIS 11111%%1M PETRONILA FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 aSSIV FM 665 AND CR 22, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Schools BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -CAMPUS 2391 COUNTY ROAD 47, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 11 1 IP a ge Emergency Operation Center(s) PORT PORT OF CORPUS OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY CRITICAL CHRISTI AUTHORITY EOC FACILITES 1002 E. PORT AVE., CORPUS CHRISTI TX Police Stations WILLIAM D. DODGE III SECURITY COMMAND CENTER 1002 E. PORT AVE., CORPUS CHRISTI TX Fire Stations REFINERY TERMINAL FIRE COMPANY 1001 MC BRIDE LANE, CORPUS CHRISTI TX78407 Power Generating Stations NUECES BAY ENERGY CENTER NAVIGATION BLVD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78402 Convention Center/Cruise Terminal CONGRESSMAN SOLOMON P. ORTIZ INTERNATIONAL CENTER 402 HARBOR DR., CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 Marine Traffic HARBOR MASTER'S OFFICE 1305 N. SHORELINE BLVD., CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 Administration RUBEN BONILLA CENTER FOR GLOBAL TRADE 222 POWER ST., CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 Power Generating Stations NUECES BAY ENERGY CENTER NAVIGATION BLVD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78402 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 12 1Page 111111111' PP /t i v 11 Mt% M,P 1/13/2005 5.00 1/17/2005 3.00 1/23/2005 5.00 12/31/2005 0.06 1/1/2006 10.00 1/2/2006 0.06 1/3/2006 0.06 1/5/2006 1.00 1/6/2006 1.00 1/6/2006 1.50 1/16/2006 72.00 1/17/2006 5.00 1/20/2006 10.00 1/24/2006 2.00 1/27/2006 0.50 2/5/2006 70.00 lljJ �l n Illil �111111�IIII�II1 Unsafe burning of household trash Unsafe burning of household trash Brush pile burning Unknown Cause Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Right-of-ways; utility co.'s and highways Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Spite Oil field equipment (pump jacks, faulty electric lines, etc.) 2/7/2006 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/8/2006 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/10/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 2/10/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 2/13/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 2/15/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/16/2006 1.00 Origin traceable to trains 2/17/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/20/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 3/6/2006 3.00 Unknown Cause 3/8/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 3/9/2006 0.25 Unknown Cause 3/9/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 1 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 3/10/2006 0.06 3/12/2006 5.00 3/13/2006 2.00 3/18/2006 200.00 3/19/2006 0.06 3/21/2006 0.00 3/21/2006 1.00 3/28/2006 1.00 3/31/2006 1.00 4/4/2006 2.00 4/8/2006 1.00 4/10/2006 3.00 4/13/2006 2.00 4/16/2006 1.00 4/19/2006 1.00 4/21/2006 0.50 4/26/2006 0.50 4/28/2006 1.00 5/1/2006 0.50 5/3/2006 1.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Warming or cooking Brush pile burning Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Power Lines Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Construction debris (boards, panels, cardboard, etc.) Unknown Cause Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) Burning leaves and garden spots 5/16/2006 0.10 Unknown Cause 5/19/2006 3.00 Unknown Cause 5/21/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause 5/21/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause 5/22/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 5/25/2006 1.00 Amusement 6/8/2006 0.50 Power Lines 6/13/2006 1.00 Playing with matches 6/16/2006 0.05 Unknown Cause 6/16/2006 60.00 Unknown Cause 6/28/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 2 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 7/6/2006 1.00 7/14/2006 0.50 7/16/2006 40.00 7/22/2006 0.50 7/31/2006 0.10 8/6/2006 0.50 8/16/2006 0.50 8/21/2006 0.00 • AV\V\ Power Lines Unknown Cause Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Power Lines 8/31/2006 0.00 Unknown Cause 9/5/2006 15.00 Unknown Cause 10/8/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause 12/30/2006 50.00 Unknown Cause 1/1/2007 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/25/2007 1.00 Unknown Cause 3/24/2007 2.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 4/13/2007 3.00 Power Lines 5/3/2007 1.00 Power Lines 5/4/2007 1.00 Playing with matches 5/7/2007 2.00 Unknown Cause 6/10/2007 50.00 Unknown Cause 12/26/2007 100.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 12/29/2007 800.00 Fireworks 12/31/2007 200.00 Fireworks 1/1/2008 5.00 Fireworks 1/1/2008 10.00 Fireworks 1/1/2008 40.00 Fireworks 1/2/2008 30.00 Fireworks 1/3/2008 400.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 1/3/2008 6.00 Fireworks 1/9/2008 1.00 Power Lines 1/10/2008 2.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 3 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t • AV\V\ 1/11/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/13/2008 2.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 1/15/2008 1.00 Warming or cooking 1/30/2008 5.00 Unknown Cause 2/1/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause Prescribed burning (forest brush control/hazard reduction, grassland brush control) 2/6/2008 3000.00 2/6/2008 5.00 Unknown Cause 2/6/2008 2.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 2/7/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 2/7/2008 2.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 2/10/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/14/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 2/22/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/23/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/23/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 2/26/2008 100.00 Unknown Cause 2/26/2008 5.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 2/26/2008 20.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 2/27/2008 100.00 Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. 2/28/2008 5.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 2/29/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 3/1/2008 1.00 Power Lines 3/5/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 3/16/2008 2.00 Power Lines 3/19/2008 5.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 3/21/2008 100.00 Unknown Cause 3/26/2008 1.00 Power Lines 4/15/2008 3.00 Brush pile burning 5/8/2008 1.00 Power Lines 5/27/2008 4.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 4 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t • AV\V\ 5/30/2008 5.00 Unknown Cause 6/6/2008 20.00 Power Lines 6/9/2008 2.00 Power Lines 6/10/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 6/27/2008 30.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 7/21/2008 50.00 Power Lines 8/15/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 9/2/2008 0.25 Unknown Cause 9/19/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 9/24/2008 2.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 10/5/2008 1.00 Origin traceable to lightning 11/5/2008 2.00 Playing with matches 11/5/2008 2.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 11/24/2008 1.00 Origin traceable to smoking 11/24/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 11/28/2008 10.00 Origin traceable to smoking 12/4/2008 25.00 Warming or cooking 12/6/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 12/13/2008 1000.00 Unknown Cause 12/28/2008 1.00 Fireworks 12/28/2008 1.00 Fireworks 12/29/2008 1.00 Fireworks 12/30/2008 3.00 Unknown Cause 1/1/2009 0.50 Fireworks 1/1/2009 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/2/2009 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/3/2009 0.50 Origin traceable to smoking 1/7/2009 2.00 Unknown Cause 1/10/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/10/2009 1.00 Origin traceable to smoking 1/10/2009 0.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 5 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 1/12/2009 0.00 1/15/2009 1.00 1/15/2009 1.00 1/18/2009 0.25 1/19/2009 2.00 1/20/2009 3.00 1/21/2009 0.25 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Origin traceable to smoking Unsafe burning of household trash Construction debris (boards, panels, cardboard, etc.) 1/24/2009 1000.00 Unknown Cause 1/25/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/25/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause 1/27/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/29/2009 0.50 Origin traceable to smoking 1/29/2009 1.00 Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. 2/3/2009 100.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 2/3/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause 2/3/2009 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/5/2009 5.00 Origin traceable to smoking 2/6/2009 0.50 Origin traceable to smoking 2/9/2009 70.00 Unknown Cause 2/9/2009 50.00 Unknown Cause 2/11/2009 1.00 Power Lines 2/11/2009 1.00 Power Lines 2/11/2009 1.00 Origin traceable to smoking 2/20/2009 0.50 Warming or cooking 2/20/2009 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 3/1/2009 0.25 Unknown Cause 3/1/2009 0.25 Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. 3/1/2009 2.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 3/1/2009 60.00 Brush pile burning 3/2/2009 0.25 Origin traceable to smoking 3/3/2009 3.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 6 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 3/7/2009 0.30 3/9/2009 1.00 3/18/2009 1.00 3/21/2009 1.00 3/21/2009 5.00 3/26/2009 20.00 3/29/2009 1.00 4/1/2009 1.00 4/2/2009 40.00 4/2/2009 40.00 4/3/2009 1.00 4/3/2009 20.00 4/18/2009 3.00 • AV\V\ Origin traceable to smoking Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Playing with matches Playing with matches Playing with matches Power Lines Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 4/20/2009 3.00 Unknown Cause 4/22/2009 15.00 Unknown Cause 4/26/2009 7.00 Unknown Cause 4/28/2009 5.00 Unknown Cause 4/29/2009 0.50 Power Lines 5/3/2009 26.00 Playing with matches 5/15/2009 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 5/15/2009 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 5/15/2009 7.00 Unknown Cause 5/15/2009 5.00 Unknown Cause 5/25/2009 0.50 Playing with matches 5/29/2009 0.50 Power Lines 6/28/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 6/30/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause 7/4/2009 2.00 Unknown Cause 7/16/2009 0.50 Burning leaves and garden spots 7/21/2009 100.00 Playing with matches 8/4/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 7 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 8/8/2009 2.00 8/18/2009 1.00 8/24/2009 1.00 8/30/2009 1.00 9/18/2009 0.50 9/18/2009 0.50 10/16/2009 1.00 10/17/2009 0.50 10/18/2009 0.50 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Origin traceable to lightning Playing with matches Playing with matches Power Lines Playing with matches Power Lines 10/31/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 11/5/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 11/13/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 11/14/2009 5.00 Unknown Cause 12/23/2009 3.00 Playing with matches 1/1/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/8/2010 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/9/2010 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/17/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/19/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/19/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/20/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 2/12/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 2/15/2010 1.00 Playing with matches 3/7/2010 1.00 Playing with matches 3/9/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 3/14/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 3/17/2010 1.00 Playing with matches 3/23/2010 2.00 Unknown Cause 3/28/2010 0.50 Playing with matches 3/30/2010 0.20 Unknown Cause 4/7/2010 0.10 Warming or cooking Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 8 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 4/22/2010 1.00 4/26/2010 0.00 4/26/2010 0.00 5/5/2010 0.50 5/9/2010 0.50 5/10/2010 0.00 5/10/2010 0.00 5/10/2010 0.00 5/10/2010 0.00 5/12/2010 0.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause 5/12/2010 0.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 6/5/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 6/16/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 6/16/2010 0.50 Power Lines 7/4/2010 0.10 Fireworks 7/12/2010 0.10 Brush pile burning 7/17/2010 0.10 Power Lines 7/18/2010 1.00 Power Lines 8/8/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 8/21/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 10/16/2010 1.00 Power Lines 10/22/2010 2.00 Power Lines 10/29/2010 0.50 Power Lines 10/29/2010 0.50 Trash dumps 12/11/2010 75.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 12/31/2010 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 9 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 1/1/2011 0.00 1/1/2011 0.00 2/8/2011 1.00 2/12/2011 15.00 2/12/2011 0.00 2/13/2011 2.00 2/13/2011 3.00 2/13/2011 0.00 2/16/2011 1.00 2/17/2011 0.00 2/19/2011 0.00 3/10/2011 0.00 3/10/2011 0.00 3/12/2011 3.00 3/19/2011 0.00 3/19/2011 1.00 4/5/2011 2.00 4/5/2011 0.00 4/11/2011 0.00 4/28/2011 0.50 4/29/2011 0.50 4/29/2011 0.50 4/30/2011 2.00 5/3/2011 0.50 5/3/2011 25.00 5/3/2011 1.00 5/4/2011 0.00 5/5/2011 2.00 5/19/2011 1.00 6/3/2011 0.00 6/4/2011 3.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 10 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 6/6/2011 0.00 6/14/2011 4.00 6/15/2011 1.00 6/26/2011 0.00 6/27/2011 8.00 6/29/2011 1.00 6/29/2011 0.00 6/29/2011 0.00 6/29/2011 500.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Trash dumps Trash dumps Unknown Cause Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Cause Cause Cause Cause 6/29/2011 500.00 Origin traceable to smoking 7/3/2011 0.50 Unknown Cause 7/7/2011 50.00 Unknown Cause 7/7/2011 0.25 Unknown Cause 7/9/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause 7/9/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause 7/11/2011 0.25 Unknown Cause 7/11/2011 3.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 7/12/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause 7/16/2011 0.25 Unknown Cause 7/24/2011 100.00 Unknown Cause 7/29/2011 4.00 Unknown Cause 8/2/2011 2.00 Unknown Cause 8/5/2011 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/8/2011 2.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/11/2011 12.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/12/2011 2.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/15/2011 5.00 Pasture and field burning (including grass, crop residues) 8/16/2011 40.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 8/17/2011 6.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 8/19/2011 2.00 Unknown Cause 8/19/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 11 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 8/20/2011 0.00 8/21/2011 7.00 8/21/2011 1.00 8/21/2011 0.50 8/22/2011 0.50 8/23/2011 5.00 8/29/2011 0.25 9/3/2011 0.00 9/3/2011 4.00 9/4/2011 2.00 9/4/2011 2.00 9/5/2011 0.00 9/8/2011 1.00 9/8/2011 2.00 9/9/2011 0.50 9/13/2011 2.00 9/26/2011 2.00 10/5/2011 1000.00 10/15/2011 5.00 10/16/2011 5.00 11/4/2011 Unspecified • AV\V\ Unsafe burning of household trash Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Trash dumps Trash dumps Trash dumps Construction debris (boards, panels, cardboard, etc.) Unsafe burning of household trash Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Origin traceable to smoking Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unspecified 1/1/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/3/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/16/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 2/2/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 3/28/2012 1000.00 Origin traceable to smoking 7/18/2012 5.00 Unknown Cause 7/31/2012 15.00 Unknown Cause 8/26/2012 0.25 Unknown Cause 9/3/2012 10.00 Brush pile burning 9/3/2012 10.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 12 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 9/10/2012 2.00 9/12/2012 2.00 9/13/2012 10.00 10/12/2012 5.00 10/26/2012 2.00 11/20/2012 1.00 • AV\V\ Power Lines Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Power Lines Power Lines 11/24/2012 1.00 Playing with matches 12/20/2012 40.00 Unknown Cause 2/13/2013 0.25 Unknown Cause 2/25/2013 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/25/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/27/2013 0.50 Unsafe burning of household trash 3/4/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/11/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/12/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/24/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/25/2013 Unspecified High winds downed power lines 8/5/2013 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/17/2013 0.25 Unknown Cause 8/23/2013 0.25 Unknown Cause 12/14/2013 800.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 1/15/2014 7.00 Unknown Cause 1/28/2014 0.25 Unknown Cause 2/14/2014 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/14/2014 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/15/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/21/2015 0.20 Warming or cooking 2/19/2015 1.00 Playing with matches 2/21/2015 0.10 Warming or cooking 6/15/2015 0.15 Unknown Cause 7/4/2015 1.00 Fireworks Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 13 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t • AV\V\ 7/12/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/3/2015 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/9/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/15/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/30/2015 0.20 Brush pile burning 8/30/2015 0.50 Unknown Cause 9/12/2015 0.20 Power Lines 10/1/2015 1.00 Brush pile burning 11/9/2015 0.10 Unknown Cause 11/21/2015 2.00 Warming or cooking *Fire data is reported by fire departments. Wildfires of unknown origin may have initially been reported as "Unknown Cause" or "Unknown Cause." They have been recoded to "unknown cause." Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 14 1 If" a ifmllll i 91d 0 111111111111111111111 j trr a1111 111111 mu 1 111111 111111 III, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix F 1 1 If" a I v uuij1111ui 1111� 110 Nueces County MAP Meetings and Public Involvement Activities Date Event Comments Plan Evaluation Checklist Goal/Objective Address Current Needs? Yes No Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, in jury, damage to property, the economy, and natural systems • Objective 1.1: Protect the life, health and safety of residents • Objective 1.2: Protect existing/new critical facilities and infrastructure • Objective 1.3: Provide protection for future/existing developments • Objective 1.4: Provide backup power to critical facilities/infrastructure • Objective 1.5: Minimize impacts from all hazards Goal 2: Maintain and enhance emergency management/mitigation capabilities • Objective 2.1: Update/develop plans, studies, and mapping for all hazards • Objective 2.2: Incorporate/improve hazard mitigation strategies into ordinances, plans and policies • Objective 2.3: Conduct/develop drills/training for all hazards • Objective 2.4: Implement and maintain the Nueces County Multi - Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan • Objective 2.5: Participate in programs that promote hazard mitigation strategies • Objective 2.6: Build, obtain, and maintain critical facilities and equipment Goal 3: Maintain public education and awareness activities • Objective 3.1: Expand public outreach campaigns for all hazards • Objective 3.2: Promote disaster preparedness planning for families Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 2 1 IP a Planning Considerations Address Current Needs? Yes No Has the nature or magnitude of the risks identified in the plan changed? If yes, comment below. Are the resources adequate for implementing the plan? If no, comment below Have there been any implementation problems such as technical, political, legal or coordination issues with other agencies for the mitigation actions identified? If yes, reference action by selecting "Delayed" on the Project Implementation worksheet with a comment describing issue in implementation Should personnel/agency changes be made to the Galveston County Multi - Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Committee? If yes, complete the mitigation planning team worksheet. Have there been changes to the participating communities' capabilities that improve or impair the progress of the mitigation strategies identified in the plan? If yes, please comment below. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 3 I If" a Mitigation Planning Team Worksheet Use this worksheet to identify partner organizations to invite to participate on the planning team. Some organizations do not need to be involved in every decision of the planning process but are stakeholders that require outreach and involvement during the planning process. Revise the list of general partners below to reflect the organizations in your community. Mark which organizations will be invited to participate on the planning team and which will be involved through stakeholder outreach activities. Planning Team — The core group responsible for making decisions, guiding the panning process, and agreeing upon the final contents of the plan. Stakeholders — Individuals or groups that affect or can be affected by a mitigation action or policy. Partner Organizations Local Agencies Planning Team Stakeholder Notes Building Code Enforcement City Management/County Administration Emergency Management Fire Department/District Floodplain Administration Geographic Information Systems Parks and Recreation Planning/Community Development Public Works Stormwater Management Transportation (Roads and Bridges) City Council/Board of Commissioners Planning Commission Planning/Community Development Regional/Metropolitan Planning Organization(s) City/County Attorney's Office Economic Development Agency Local Emergency Planning Committee Police/Sherriff's Department Sanitation Department Tax Assessor's Office Special Districts and Authorities Airport, Seaport Authorities Fire Control District Flood Control District School District(s) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 4 1 lP a S Transit Authority Utility District Partner Organizations I Planning Team I Stakeholder I Notes Non -Governmental Organizations American Red Cross Chamber of Commerce Community/Faith-Based Organizations Environmental Organizations Homeowners Associations Neighborhood/Community Organizations Utility Companies State Agencies State Emergency Management Agency State Dam Safety State Department of Transportation State Fire and Forestry Agency State Geological Survey State Water Resources Agency State National Flood Insurance Program Coordinator State Planning Office Federal Agencies Federal Emergency Management Agency Land Management Agencies (USFS/NPS/BLM) National Weather Service US Army Corps of Engineers US Department of Housing and Urban Development US Department of Transportation US Environmental Protection Agency US Geological Survey Other Tribal Officials Colleges/Universities Land Developers and Real Estate Agencies Major Employers and Businesses Professional Associations Neighboring Jurisdictions Note: Multi -jurisdictional planning teams require at least one representative for each participating jurisdiction. This worksheet can be used by each jurisdiction to identify their local sub -team. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 5 1 P ,n S Mitigation Action Implementation Worksheet 6 a, f6 0 Jurisdiction Name: Comment Completion Date Completed No Longer Required * 13 w f6 GJ 0 In Progress Reference Mitigation Action Number Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G Headquarters 2925 Briarpark Drive Suite 400 Houston, TX 77042 713.266.6900 Into@Ian-iinc.com Texas Austin College Station Corpus Christi Dallas Fort Worth Houston San Antonio San Marcos Waco an nc.c Arizona Phoenix California Los Angeles Milpitas Orange Sacramento Florida Miami Tampa Bay Illinois Chicago Michigan Flint Lansing r rr ll / l/l, 11 � r ) i � ll1 11111111 r. , t r , City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 1111ii1i[ �uNuuq�i'pI�I��V�N��YNYVh Proposed Action 1111,11.11,1;111,11;1);11,11,11.00111,Ifilif)fii.)1):11,11.,,,ir 1011 11111111"11 "1'7' 1111111111,11111,,11111111111111111. 1111111111111111..1!..,111,....1.1111.111....! 11,1,11111111 11111111111111111110 111, 1111111111.111 Seawall Capital Improvement Projects for routine maintenance and restoration. .ACI INFORI Site and Location: Sewall in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Providing routine repairs help to defer major structural reconstruction efforts Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACt ION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of maintaining and restoring the seawall in Corpus Christi will protect existing buildings along the seawall and any new buildings being built from Hurricanes and Tropical Storms and Floods. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: CIP Project Funding and a sales tax adjustment Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-10 Years NC( RP( RATION INT' PLANS AND PFtOCEDURE � Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 89 1 If" ,n .,111111111 �nn�doiu��1111.1 11111111111111111111 Proposed Action Construction of a new bulkhead in Corpus Christi Bay along the south side shoreline of Corpus Christi. A INFORMAL Site and Location: South Side Shoreline in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Construct a new bulkhead along the south shoreline of the Science and History Museum eastward across the United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) property terminating at the northwest corner of the recently constructed bulkhead in front of the South Texas Art Museum. The low-lying areas on the USACE property and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority would be filled to an elevation approximately the same as that in front of the Art Museum. Area paving could be constructed between the new bulkhead and existing floodwall. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Deter coastal erosion and mitigation potential flooding of existing properties situation at the northern section of downtown Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $10,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Sales Tax Proceeds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 90 1 If" ,n Implementation Schedule: 4-10 Years INC RP( RATION INTO EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 91 1Page II q)010luyuAtl0,) '1,1Vntly1111111JIVNNNN�N '11h��NflIflIIVNI 1111 III 1111111111111111 vIIIII )) Proposed Action 11000000 o0000110)111 Make improvements to the Salt Flat Levee System. 1NFOI MA' Site and Location: Salt Flat Levee System in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Salt Flat Levee System is an integral component of the downtown flood protection system. The levee requires improvements and continued maintenance to ensure that the system will function as originally designed. Additional studies are underway and improvements are planned that would be sufficient to be certified by FEMA as a freeboard deficient reach. This means that although the system would not afford the level of protection required to prevent overtopping in a 100 -year event, it would not be vulnerable to a catastrophic failure. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: Improvements on the Salt Flat Levee system will help mitigate flooding of existing buildings situated in downtown Corpus Christi. Failure to achieve FEMA certification would greatly impact the City of Corpus Christi and downtown business insurance costs. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCO RPO I EXI 11N( NS ANDPFOCE Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 92 1 If" ,n Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 93 1Page u��'hh�pwwu�olltnVII'V ill 111,1,11;11..0111111 111 iy°111N��1�"pC! 11111111111111111 Proposed Action Make improvements to Power Street Pump Station. INFO ;NIA Site and Location: Power Street Pump Station in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Power Street pump station was originally constructed in 1947 as part of the bay front protection. It has 3 pumps with diesel powered motors. The Kinney Street pump station was also constructed in 1947. The pump station was reconstructed in 2009. It has 5 pumps with electric motors that are dependent on the 3 generators inside. One redundant pump is located on site. The downtown flood protection system relies on these two pump stations to remove all water from the area during a significant storm event. Preliminary studies have indicated that the pumping capacity would not be adequate to handle rainfall, inflow and wave overtopping during a 100 -year storm event. Planned 2D modeling will help to better define the demands that would be placed on the system during significant storm events. This project would enhance the reliability and capacity of the downtown storm system. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will improve operational efficiencies, save money on electrical costs, and help keep the downtown area from flooding during heavy rain conditions. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 94 1 If" ,n Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 95 1 If" a �Ninn� �NVNu�VN�1hiiflVil1NNYQ11h11111 !!Puiu j l Jr.. 1„1011��NP " 11 Proposed Action Update the Corpus Christi Stormwater Master Plan. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Corpus Christi City Council approved the Storm Water Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY99-00 on July 20, 1999 (Ordinance No. 023703). Included were separate projects for drainage studies in specific areas of the City. The need to integrate these individual drainage studies into a consistent, uniform analysis became evident and was approved in Storm Water CIP for FY00- 01, (Ordinance No. 024130). The City's use of master plans that date back to 1946, 1961, 1970, 1982, and 1988 resulted in the use of inconsistent criteria without an adopted level of protection policy. The separate projects are integrated into the FY00-01 Storm Water CIP as a Storm Water Master Plan Project. The Development of a comprehensive, updated, consistent Storm Water Master Plan based on an adopted Storm Water Criteria and Design Manual is necessary to respond to development, environmental issues and to better define and prioritize on going and future drainage capital improvement projects. The purposes of this project is as follows: a. Establish drainage criteria that reflects input from the different segments of the community (elected officials, developers, engineers, citizens, planning and zoning) and in the consensus process identify a "level of protection" for the City to be adopted as a standard for the City b. Adopt a drainage criteria and design procedure for designers to use in capital improvement projects and in the subdivision platting process of residential and commercial development c. Establish policy statements or guidelines that are responsive to storm water quality, storm water pollution prevention requirements, development issues for use in future street and drainage project design d. Develop a master plan to implement the drainage criteria established to include updates of the existing areas and production of new master plan for other areas. The master plan will include the inventory of all outfalls and data necessary for Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 96 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 97 1Page the design process and will utilize criteria and reflects the characteristics of each master plan Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATION ACTION f ETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Prioritization of major drainage improvements considering level of service and return on investment could greatly impact the operating budget and will help eliminate the flooding that impacts all of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $4,084,900 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORP( RATION INT O EXIST ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 97 1Page Bio MMtll°090Pyu11i111u1p°°NpNI'NNNiiiiiiiIIIIIIuUl����,�u 11111 1„"111111, Proposed Action Excavate silt and debris in Drainage Master Channel 31 caused by the erosion on sides and bottom of the Drainage Master Channel 31. Site and Location: Drainage Master Channel 31 in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Master Channel 31 was constructed in various phases in conjunction with the development in the area. The side slopes and bottom are severely eroded resulting in poor drainage and encroachment of ditch outside of the City right-of- way. This project will provide critical improvements to restore and improve the drainage profile and include erosion control measures such as side slope stabilization, soil treatment, vegetative cover and other best management practices. This project is planned in multiple phases as funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure M ITIGA11C N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,819,800 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 98 1 If" ,„n g („ Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department Implementation Schedule: 3-4 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 99 1Page uuiU.,I��1)flIuy��Aa�Na1)nnn4 IV�NuHA11uHph��VN1[NNHpYhhVldll! i, 1n w�'���� Proposed Action Improvements to side slopes on Schanen Ditch to eliminate erosion problems. fNFOIMATI Site and Location: Schanen Drainage Ditch in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The existing profile of Schanen Ditch exceeds the recommended slope of 4:1 and maximum of 3:1. This is resulting in major slope stabilization failure in multiple areas near the Yorktown Bridge. Work to improve this ditch will include excavation/backfill to widen and create 3:1 side slopes with stabilization matting, new culvert and outfalls, riprap and ditch bottom improvements, seeding, irrigation adjustments, traffic controls, dewatering and other miscellaneous items. Construction of Phase 1 of this project has been recently completed and future phases will be completed to the extent that funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTION f E7'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of channels and ditches is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,756,100 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department Implementation Schedule: 3-4 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 100 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 101 1Page lulUoollooAW1111r0n111nnn,u,11111I1111131pliiririririrli „Iv H 10. [o 1,1il1ra11I1111 11,I 111111111m� .111 11".!111111111111111111[111 Proposed Action La Voila Creek Channel Excavation (Phase 1) ACI INFORI Site and Location: La Voila Creek in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: This project will involve the improvement of La Voila Creek that crosses SH 357 (Saratoga Blvd). The project will provide 100 -year capacity for conveyance to the Oso Creek. Phase 1 Channel improvements include the removal of vegetation from the channel North of Saratoga Boulevard and channel widening South of Saratoga Boulevard. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN AC"I IEI111 DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of channels and ditches is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $4,152,800 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department 1-2 Years NCCRP(RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 102 lPage Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 103 1Page yl� AJlyj�(inntl411IV'G'IHVNu�VNgh�h11i�1NH11�Yhhlii,, o e I II uu fl Proposed Action Participate in the FEMA Flood Map Modernization Process. Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Federal Emergency Management Agency's Multi -Hazard Flood Map Modernization Program will update and digitize flood hazard maps across the nation. Most the City of Corpus Christi's FIRMs are nearly 20 years old. It is in the interest of the City and its residents for the maps, which determine flood insurance premiums, to be accurate and up-to-date. Other planning and hazard mitigation benefits are expected to accrue as well. The City of Corpus Christi is currently working through the appeals process of the map modernization Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATI bACTIN E- AIL N Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Increased participation in available flood insurance. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services 1-2 Years NCORP( RATION INT 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 104 1Page ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 105 1Page yru��ai,"n a �M�r��u�INHH� �ppppVuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu° Proposed Action Improve the City's CRS rating from a Class 7 to a Class 5. Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Corpus Christi has participated in the CRS program since 1991 and is currently rated as a Class 7 community, entitling its residents to a 15% discount on flood insurance premiums. This project is intended to improve its rating to a Class 5, thereby increasing the premium discount by an additional 10% for Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Other actions identified in this Mitigation Plan will have a direct bearing on fulfilling CRS requirements to qualify for the higher classification. This activity includes a comprehensive review of eligible activity requirements, identification of additional potential actions, monitoring completion of previously identified actions, and completing the application process. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGA11bN ACTION f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Increased participation in available flood insurance. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services 1-2 Years !NCO PO EXI TING P NS ANDPFIOCE CRS Program, Floodplain Regulations, and Stormwater Regulations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 106 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 107 1Page llilu��say��Aa�� � inn°1.11.; A� N �r��u�wNHH��nn�iu Proposed Action Build the Catulla Reservoir in the upper reaches of the Nueces River which would include a pipeline to divert water directly into Choke Canyon Reservoir. A INFO MATT Site and Location: Upper Reaches of Nueces River Risk Reduction Benefit: The Corps of Engineers studied the Cotulla Reservoir site, located in the upper Nueces Basin, in the 1960's. The recent Nueces River Basin Reconnaissance Study identified a potentially down -sized version of this project, including a pipeline to divert water directly into Choke Canyon Reservoir. In addition to the flood damage reduction potential for Lake Corpus Christi and the lower river basin, this project would enhance the regional water supply by increasing water storage capacity, and reducing losses associated with downstream evaporation across an 81 mile braided reach. During Phase 1 of the Feasibility Study, existing data will be reviewed to estimate the flood damage reduction potential of the project: a. A preliminary hydrologic analysis to determine the portion of the volume of historical lower- basin floods that originate upstream of Cotulla will be performed. b. A review of existing map information of the Nueces River for a 25 -mile reach downstream of the proposed reservoir to identify areas that could benefit from the potential flood damage reduction potential of the reservoir will be performed. c. Data from FEMA and other agencies on historical flood damages will be summarized. (Phase 2) Depending on the findings of the flood damage analyses, a daily flow flood model may need to be developed to evaluate the downstream flood damage reduction potential in terms of magnitude and frequency for the Cotulla Diversion Project. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 108 lPage MITIGATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods, Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Mitigate life-threatening hazards to buildings within the upper reaches of the Nueces River, while providing for a source of surface water to avoid disruption to essential utilities, eliminate the risk of potential economic loses. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $445,000 Potential Funding Sources: USACE will cover 50% and Non -Federal Sponsors will cover the remaining 50%. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Summer of 2018 INC RP( RATION INTd EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Nueces River Basin Reconnaissance Study ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 109 lPage I!Ii1I1JilluI h l91IIIIII Proposed Action Implementation of a Desalination Program Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi's Desalination Program is a progressive and proactive step to begin determining the feasibility of developing a drought proof future water supply using brackish groundwater and seawater. The City of Corpus Christi has secured grant funds from the US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) to assist with this project and will have expert technical resources with Reclamation providing their experience and guidance. The City has already secured $400,000 in grant funding for this project from Reclamation. This program will provide the City with the reliability, security, sustainability and availability of brackish groundwater and seawater as possible future water sources. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTIN f TAILti Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: The desalination program can be a secure source of freshwater to avoid disruption to essential utilities, eliminate the risk of potential economic loses. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,859,400 Potential Funding Sources: Water operation funds, raw water supply fund and bureau of Reclamation grant. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi 1-2 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 110 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 111 lPage liiD>�u��u�y�uAa�l0i1.,1nnn11,l111N'�NuNA�uNNhN�IV[1NpYNNVIN Q u11+?MNN'N�Ni • pip lily Air • " dodpp W9 Proposed Action Make improvements to the instrumentation system at Wesley Seale Dam. A INF OI MAl Site and Location: Wesley Seale Dam in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: This project provides for improvements to the original instrumentation system including annual safety inspection, integration with O.N. Stevens WTP process controls, The Howell-Bunger Valve, the downstream sluice gates, and the dewatering system, in response to previous inspections and priority investment recommendations into the system. This project will protect the integrity of the Wesley Seale Dam system (1957), to provide for proper inspection and updated regulatory reports per TCEQ. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods; Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will ensure the City can provide reservoir supplies to its customers and other downstream water right -holders and will secure the structural integrity of the dam through established dam safety protocols. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,850,600 Potential Funding Sources: Revenue Bond Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department 3-4 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 112 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 113 lPage 0.D.V.V1'l!1,1f1suyiAaN lir nnV�I NuNA11uHp�11111VNNNH4Yupn.h.l'! Proposed Action Maintain and adopt most current building codes. A INFOI MATT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi has adopted, with local amendments, the Building Codes effective September 1, 2016, The International Code Council (ICC), 2015 editions of the International Building Code, Existing Building Code, Energy Conservation Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code for One- and Two -Family Dwellings and the National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) National Electric Code. The International Building Codes are always being updated to provide better protection by utilizing the best construction practices. The City of Corpus Christi will be periodically updating the codes with code cycles that become available. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans Regulations A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Land Subsidence. Effect on new/existing buildings: By maintaining the most update building codes, the city is requiring that construction adhere to the most stringent codes, thus helping to reduce potential loses if exposed to a hazard. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/ Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 114 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 115 lPage 2-3 Years INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 115 lPage uuuuD��u�u�y�AaNN� jnnn��lV�NuHA�uHph��V��NNY�YhhVlgll�J����M�;�� r IdPOOVVvUlIII VOV1111.0.01.111 011111111 1IJJII VVJ1111(00111 Proposed Action Make improvements to the side seals on the Wesley Seale Dam Spillway to maintain the spillway's integrity. A INFOI MAl Site and Location: Wesley Seale Dam in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Wesley Seals Dam has 60 crest gates located in two separate spillways: the south spillway includes 27 gates and the north spillway includes 33 gates. Over the years, leakage from the side seals has increased and it has become significant at several of the gates. The water flow from the excessive leakage damages the concrete and encourages algae and other vegetative growth and leads to corrosion issues on the gates, metal appurtenances and reinforcing steel. This project provides for the necessary improvements including seal replacement, miscellaneous structural repairs and application of a protective coating system for the Dam. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATION ACTI N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will increase the service life of the structure and prevent future corrosion, subsequent section loss and connection deterioration which will potentially lower the probability of increased flooding. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $22,800,000 Potential Funding Sources: Revenue Bond Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 116 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 117 1 If" a 4-10 Years INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 117 1 If" a uuliu{yl� s ���;u�a�N �1 1'1 PI'P�fl�N11f 11�11111 Ii l)!� ��9u111.)dual�h 11111111111.1111c!il 1q11 , Ha'111111:1(.11,111,11011011.111.111111J1111)111 . � m� puug Proposed Action 11111.11):1'11'11.11,1:1„11„11111111111.111.1:11.111i; !!!!a?( " Build a floodwall along Corpus Christi Bay at the Science and Natural History Museum. ACKGR UND IN:FORI Site and Location: Corpus Christi Bay near the Science and Natural History Museum in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Recommendation to construct a new floodwall (or a coastal structure) that would follow a "hypotenuse" alignment between the existing Promenade and the USACE Bulkhead. The project would also backfill the triangle to make it function more like a coastal structure. This would also provide additional land area for future use. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of building a flood wall will help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the downtown area of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $3,5000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years INCORPO EXI TING PL N` ANDPFOCE Capital Improvements Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 118 1Page ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 119 1Page � �Nhfl�N�NflNN� ��� N� iggq�ll raw � �IIIII ,I IIII Proposed Action Make improvements to the erosion on sides and bottom of Drainage Master Channel 31. fNFOI MAli Site and Location: Drainage Master Channel 31 in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Master Channel 31 was constructed in various phases in conjunction with the development in the area. The side slopes and bottom are severely eroded resulting in poor drainage and encroachment of ditch outside of the City right-of- way. This project will provide critical improvements to restore and improve the drainage profile and include erosion control measures such as side slope stabilization, soil treatment, vegetative cover and other best management practices. This project is planned in multiple phases as funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Structure and Infrastructure A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Developmen Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 120 1page INCORPORATIONI T ISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 121 1Page i �� ui u�a �ni�iNi Nid hn� �I' 1111 mu 1101111 Ili1.010 looljl)„, 4 001 �r mo1011010011pillil 11111111 MI' 11 Proposed Action Utilize the city adopted "Developer Agreement" tha the can use with developers to help cover the cos of installing over -sized stormwater drainage. ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Under the platting ordinance, the City of Corpus Christi participates with developers on utility construction for over -sized main stormwater lines. These funds may also be used to address development drainage concerns. This project will provide for the City's share of such projects, as necessary, up to the approved amount. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $3,100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Stormwater Master Plan and Regulations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 122 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 123 1Page II�i0000ii gNNhN� mill "11 'f 1 Proposed Action Mill eiiipiiliovoyoyoW UIIIVIIUpUU 00 000 I„..1111.011111 1100001010101000 ,0000010 00:g°1°11100111110,1011010 0.,1000c00;01.1,10,11.1i0 Complete an assessment of the needed repairs and improvements on all 8 major and 100 mino stormwater outfalls that drain into Corpus Christi Bay. ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: There are eight major storm water outfalls and more than 100 other outfalls that allow runoff to drain into Corpus Christi Bay. In 2003, 13.5 miles of these outfall structures were inspected and improvements and repairs were made to four outfalls. The purpose of this current project is to provide an updated assessment, which may include the Brawner/proctor and Gollihar outfalls and other outfalls, pending results of the initial assessment, and providing recommendations for repairs, improvements, and rehabilitation as necessary. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N ACt ISN DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of the storm water conveyance systems is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $2,447,200 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 124 1 If" ,n g 000000 Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Engineering Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 125 1Page ������pilU�J V�u��?�NAa�N �ry� unnnN�IH.;1.1m�h�NNNp�NN�Yhhul�°;� Proposed Action Complete a feasibility study of Oso Creek at the confluence of La Volta Creek to determine if any construction projects will help the creek conveyance capacity during high flow events. A fNFORMA,. Site and Location: Oso Creek in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The drainage profiles of Oso Creek east of the La Volta Creek confluence show several constrictions that impact the base flood elevations upstream. This project will investigate the feasibility of the construction of additional creek conveyance capacity for high flow events. If the investigation shows a significant potential to impact the base flood elevation, then construction will be completed in those areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATI ON ACTI N (DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of the storm water conveyance of Oso Creek is critical to avoid potential rising surface water elevations that would result in encroachment flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $4,715,400 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Engineering Department Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 126 1page INCORPORATIONI T ISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 127 lPage UNNN� NYY�� ����������I�luuu�luuuuuuuum I�I�IU I� Proposed Action Have ISO conduct another assessment to see if the City has done enough improvements to its building department to gain a better BCEGS rating. A INFOI MATT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) is an independent organization that administers the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BECGS) to assess "the building codes in effect in a particular community and how the community enforces its building codes, with special emphasis on mitigation of losses from natural hazards." The grading can influence the cost of insurance coverage in the community. Since its last assessment, the City of Corpus Christi has adopted the 2015 International Building Code and the 2016 International Residential Code for One and Two Family Dwellings, among others, and should be eligible for an improved grade. This activity includes scheduling a re -assessment and compiling the necessary documentation. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Land Subsidence. Effect on new/existing buildings: Public participation in available insurance discount options on Homeowners insurance policies. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Cost/ Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 128 lPage Implementation Schedule: 1-2 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Building Code Regulations; CRS; Floodplain Regulations ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 129 1 If" a �IiuD����IuyNAaNN���nnn��lV�NuNA�uHph1,VN�NNH�YhhVldllIpIII. � 1,1,1il1111 Proposed Action Implement a multi -hazard public awareness program. A INFOIMATI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi has seen multiple hazards occur within the years past. Most residents are heavily informed of what to do during heavy rains, tropical storms and hurricanes. However, there are multiple hazards that are not as frequent. The City will be working towards creating and disseminating a pamphlet(s) that will cover what to do before, during and after the following hazards: Extreme Heat, Lighting, Hailstorm, Hurricane and Tropical Storms, Windstorms, Tornados, Drought, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure, Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence and Wildfires Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGA14bN ACTION f ETAILti Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire. Effect on new/existing buildings: Homeowners will know what types of mitigations actions they can do to protect their lives and properties from the hazard risks. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services and Office of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review and Administer Annually Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 130 1page INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E CRS ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 131 lPage uuill���JRVA°1N��+WWII'hi�I����4�NI"ryhuu�ipP1dN,Pd�,I,'11.111111111 1 NN�0.'�°H p1PRRN1111 1111111.1.1. 11,111,11'11'011,111 ivvv. ologooloopoi Proposed Action Map and assess the vulnerabilities the city may face for Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence, and Wildfires ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Improve data and mapping on specific risks for coastal erosion, expansive soils, land subsidence and wildfires. Use GIS to identify and map erosion areas, riparian landslides, expansive soils and wildfires. Develop and maintain a database to track vulnerability and indicate where critical structures and any development is located in relation to the hazardous areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATION ACTI N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence, Wildfires Effect on new/existing buildings: By identifying the hazards, the city can provide advice as to previous hazards for future construction or preservation purposes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Cost/Staff time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services and GIS Implementation Schedule: 1-2 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T L 3 AND PI OC URE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 132 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 133 1Page uiIIJD>1 Vuiuy�AaNN a nnpI�I NNuNA uN 1111111111111,I.,.11,..,.114..1.1„.1,1.11,11.. Proposed Action Installation of groins and/or breakwaters to the areas behind the bulkhead to retrofit the areas that are eroding. ACKGR UND IN:F( RI Site and Location: Cole Park in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Coastal Erosion in Corpus Christi Bay is a serious issue. Prevention of further erosion of the shoreline at Cole Park, which is along Corpus Christi Bay through the installation of groins and/or breakwaters. Cole Park is a high use park with the city. The area behind the bulkhead is eroding and needs to be retrofitted. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITIGATI N ACTION f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $500,000 - $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Potential funding from the Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Program (CEPRA) and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 24-30 Months Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 134 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 135 1Page III u� �l�s NAY �II� II flllu uuuNluiN n 1111m n n Proposed Action ,4IllviiI omIIo IIvIIulu „ fig I111100000011 1111111111111 ts bi p oiuui IIII Adopt a local lightning ordinance for non-residential structures that are over 50' in height. A INFOr IMAI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Currently, the City of Corpus Christi does not have an ordinance that requires lighting protection for commercial structures; but, instead provides guidelines if property owners choose to add the protection. The City of Corpus Christi will be considering adopting local language that would require commercial structures over 50 feet to have adequate lighting protection. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Lightning Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: By adopting this type of higher standard in the city building codes, we are adding additional protection that can possibly reduce the risk for damages. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Costs/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Implementation Schedule: 12-18 Months NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 136 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 137 1Page lgldl IIi�N�� llllvplllpl� 11,111111.11111„ i�111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IJJi1111fri��ll Proposed Action Adopt a local ordinance requiring all habitable structures to have air conditioning. A INFOr IMAI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The International Building Codes do not require a habitable space to be air conditioned, but instead requires for it to be heated. The City of Corpus Christi will be considering adopting language that would require all habitable spaces to have adequate air condition to reduce the effects that extreme heat has on the city's population. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Extreme Heat Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: By requiring habitable spaces to be air conditioned, it will provide for added protection for the building occupant in the event of an extreme heat event. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Costs/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Implementation Schedule: 12-24 Months INCORPO EXI"STING PLANS ANLL PRICE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 138 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 139 1Page II IIIU,If IVJJIk' idll 1 1:H111011DH ,00lifilli11,111,1111111111111,1 OIL u Proposed Action Design and implement a dam breach study for dams in Corpus Christi. ACKGR UND INFORI Site and Location: Barney M Davis Cooling Reservoir Dam, Calallen Reservoir Dam, Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Risk Reduction Benefit: Better hazard -related information will improve the disaster resilience of the community. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from improved hazard information Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCOF RI F ATION INT L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 140 1 If" ,n 510 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLANNING CHECKLIST Community: City of Corpus Christi Nueces County Multijurisdictional HMAP 201 » \ _ _ § E 2 u 0 _ _ L. _ _ 2 Q. _ 0 ) C / _ LLcoQ. . o C � d Q- Q) _ a j @ § CTS / cc . . 2- 0 0 2 LI Section/Page Sect 2, Page 2 Sect 2, Page 2 Planning Process \ c 2 \ ? S m = ' k E _ > E0: � \ _ E EN)o » E 0 ) k E c S m = a a) -_ a) ® / @ ° \ E 7 = 0 E E � 0 0 / E: k N E a) \ / / 2 �— O a a d Sect 2, Page 4 Sect 2, Page 4 Sect 2, Page 11 &12 Sect 2, Page 11&12 Sect 20, Pages 9-10 Sect 2, Page 9&10 0 \ R o E k - eL E D 0C e �% cc E\ ca cm ct a)- / § a / (0 C F Ct -C £ C LO= g m o CD) ° k E -0 _ c '� S g E _ § k _ / 2 �� ¥ 2 / E 3 / k ƒ / E E 7 = - / c 2 = E c = E / o 2°% as y o \ f / 0 / E 0 Q = co) y ? \ . 0 : ' £ 2 c 0_ 0- $ m7- / = o S _c. E s>k _ / & % E 2 7 £ \ ƒ > FL O o a a d a U a mci & a Sect 2, Page 10&11 4. Assess the hazard. (max: 35) a. Plan includes an assessment of the flood hazard [REQUIRED] 12/ Sect 6, Page 1 Sect 6, Page 3 Sect 5, Sect 11, Sect 15, Sect 4 thru Sect 18 2 0 0 o / L o _ / ® ± y 3 2 a))L =N S.•••••••4- m pLr) % 2 S 0)N - S 7 ) 0 2 2 ± 7 £ E 0 a E 2 ® [ § % 2 E / E E E / \ \ o t= _ a) 0 c c \ \ / 2 / / \ . 0- § f f f C % \ 2 2 E E 5 g g - « « « m / -o a d 2 [ E } \ § _ c 2 k Lo -2 ) N E E t _ _ 2 0 eL /co E E } m k • / Sect 4 thru Sect 18 510 FMP Checklist page 1 Sect 4 thru Sect 18 Sect 4, thru Sect 18 Completed in Activity 501 ON Cii -o 0 E Ei E i5 E a o / L � u) 2 Cii , m 2 c 7 \ Cii 7 � . m co m/ t E= 2 C 2 E._ E o s ] @ / 2 2 % ° S = 2 2 - 2 / 2 2 t g 0- o 3 = S \ -0 La La To E 0- k k @ 0 0 c y_ 0 \ f E k-o0 ®-o _ k E = o = E m a) 2 0> — a) > f 3 3 D c. - @ _ ƒ \ E = Q k G g � o o = E D./ Ifo 0_ 0¥ 2 7 7[ < 0 d a 6 Impact of future floc Sect 19, Pages 1-3 6. Set goals. [REQUIRED] (2) $ $ 2 2 6 6 $ $ $ $ $ c c c c c 00000 6 6 6 6 6 Sect 19, Pages 4-6; 89-140 Sect 19, Pages 4-6; 89-140 Separate Document \ \ o o�Ro �m� u \kk\ �% E c 0 o ! o 0)0)) L k -0 2 ƒ k 5 0- c 0 a° 0 / 7 0 a a a a L£ @ / a) a) _ / / 2 3 u) / f @ t o t t 02 f f E o @ § E§ƒ 3/ ti_ \O 0 w } } } } N � ± ƒ m m m m 2/ k E 0 S o & R-/// S G E 0/ o ƒ % fr Q � ® 2 = E m S S S S= 0 7 ®°� / co 2 0 0 0 0 o /§/ t± t? -: u_ u— u— u— E. §`= t 3 S^ S m m m m o 7 2/\ m E co o m § : o o o 0%- co 2 E +6 E® 0) 0 cL 0 3 E \ % % % % - - ® ° 0 §� §� �� all 2 2 2 -C3 2\ / c \ ƒ f / ƒ 2 y = _ _ = G f a ƒ f 17) g =EEE E = f E \ƒ TD- I ƒ 0 0 0 0 7 _ as o / - ai b / 2 2 / § § § § k / / 2 = > o 2= E S 2 C[ f f fƒ 2 E 0 E > @ o 2 S E .'=, = 7 < . •o < 0 ? co > m 2 ± m a a a d d a 6 u 6 2 a a / . 6 9. \ \ Plan Total: Maximum Credit for 510 FMP = 382 510 FMP Checklist page 2 0 J 0 J 510 FMP Checklist page 3 0 0 J 0 0 J 0 510 FMP Checklist page 4 Resolution A resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas adopting the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi has experienced natural disasters that have resulted in public hazards and damage to private and public property; and WHEREAS, the hazard mitigation planning process set forth by Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of Texas offers the opportunity to consider natural hazards and risks, and to identify mitigation actions to reduce future risk; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Hazard Mitigation Plan needs to be updated; and WHEREAS, the City has created the attached Hazard Mitigation Action Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That it adopts the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan attached to this Resolution as the City's Official Hazard Mitigation Plan. Section 2. That, subject to budgeted funds, the City departments identified in the Hazard Mitigation Plan are directed to pursue implementation of the recommended high-priority activities assigned to their departments. Section 3. That any action proposed by the Hazard Mitigation Plan is subject to and contingent upon budget approval, which shall be at the discretion of the City Council and this Resolution shall not be interpreted to mandate any appropriation. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey -Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Nueces County Texas Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7/20/2017 a Section 1: Overview III 111111111111 II 11111 111111111 I Introduction 1 Scope 4 Section 2: Planning Process Plan Development 1 Resources and Existing Plans 9 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 10 Section 3: Hazard and Risk Overview Hazard Identification 1 Risk Assessment Overview 5 Section 4: Vulnerability Assessment Overview Vulnerable Assets Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Existing Assets 3 City of Agua Dulce Existing Assets 4 City of Bishop Existing Assets 5 City of Corpus Christi Existing Assets 6 City of Driscoll Existing Assets 7 City of Petronila Existing Assets 8 City of Port Aransas Existing Assets 9 City of Robstown Existing Assets 10 Port of Corpus Christi Existing Assets 11 Vulnerable Future Assets 12 Special Populations Considerations 12 Section 5: Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Hazard 7 City of Bishop Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Hazard 14 City of Petronila Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hazard 18 SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Robstown Hazard 20 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hazard 22 Section 6: Flood Flood Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Flood Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Flood Hazard 8 City of Bishop Flood Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Flood Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Flood Hazard 15 City of Petronila Flood Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Flood Hazard 19 City of Robstown Flood Hazard 21 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Flood Hazard 24 Section 7: Drought Drought Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Drought Hazard 7 City of Aqua Dulce Drought Hazard 8 City of Bishop Drought Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Drought Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Drought Hazard 11 City of Petronila Drought Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Drought Hazard 13 City of Robstown Drought Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Drought Hazard 15 Section 8: Windstorms Windstorms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorms Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Windstorms Hazard 19 City of Bishop Windstorms Hazard 21 City of Corpus Christi Windstorms Hazard 23 City of Driscoll Windstorms Hazard 25 City of Petronila Windstorms Hazards 26 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 2 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Port Aransas Windstorms Hazard 29 City of Robstown Windstorms Hazard 31 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorms Hazard 33 Section 9: Extreme Heat Extreme Heat Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Extreme Heat Hazard 5 City of Agua Dulce Extreme Heat Hazard 6 City of Bishop Extreme Heat Hazard 7 City of Corpus Christi Extreme Heat Hazard 8 City of Driscoll Extreme Heat Hazard 9 City of Petronila Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Port Aransas Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Robstown Extreme Heat Hazard 12 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Extreme Heat Hazard 13 Section 10: Lightning Lightning Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Lightning Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Lightning Hazard 7 City of Bishop Lightning Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Lightning Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Lightning Hazard 10 City of Petronila Lightning Hazard 11 City of Port Aransas Lightning Hazard 12 City of Robstown Lightning Hazard 13 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Lightning Hazard 14 Section 11: Coastal Erosion Coastal Erosion Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Coastal Erosion Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Coastal Erosion Hazard 19 City of Bishop Coastal Erosion Hazard 20 City of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 21 City of Driscoll Coastal Erosion Hazard 23 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Petronila Coastal Erosion Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Coastal Erosion Hazard 25 City of Robstown Coastal Erosion Hazard 27 Port of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 28 Section 12: Tornado Tornado Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard 13 City of Bishop Tornado Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard 16 City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard 18 City of Petronila Tornado Hazard 20 City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard 21 City of Robstown Tornado Hazard 25 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard 27 Section 13: Hailstorms Hailstorm Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hailstorm Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Hailstorm Hazard 12 City of Bishop Hailstorm Hazard 13 City of Corpus Christi Hailstorm Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Hailstorm Hazard 15 City of Petronila Hailstorm Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hailstorm Hazard 17 City of Robstown Hailstorm Hazard 18 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hailstorm Hazard 19 Section 14: Expansive Soils Expansive Soils Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Expansive Soils Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Expansive Soils Hazard 13 City of Bishop Expansive Soils Hazard 15 City of Corpus Christi Expansive Soils Hazard 17 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Driscoll Expansive Soils Hazard 22 City of Petronila Expansive Soils Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Expansive Soils Hazard 26 City of Robstown Expansive Soils Hazard 28 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Expansive Soils Hazard 30 Section 15: Dam and Levee Failure Dam and Levee Failure Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 12 City of Agua Dulce Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Bishop Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Petronila Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Robstown Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 18 Section 16: Land Subsidence Land Subsidence Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Land Subsidence Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Land Subsidence Hazard 7 City of Bishop Land Subsidence Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Land Subsidence Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Land Subsidence Hazard 11 City of Petronila Land Subsidence Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Land Subsidence Hazard 13 City of Robstown Land Subsidence Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Land Subsidence Hazard 15 Section 17: Wildfire Wildfire Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Wildfire Hazard 8 City of Agua Dulce Wildfire Hazard 10 City of Bishop Wildfire Hazard 12 City of Corpus Christi Wildfire Hazard 14 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l111111111111111 m0 ru City of Driscoll Wildfire Hazard 16 City of Petronila Wildfire Hazard 18 City of Port Aransas Wildfire Hazard 20 City of Robstown Wildfire Hazard 22 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Wildfire Hazard 24 Section 18: Winter Storms Severe Winter Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Severe Winter Storms Hazard 7 City of Agua Dulce Severe Winter Storms Hazard 8 City of Bishop Severe Winter Storms Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Severe Winter Storms Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Severe Winter Storms Hazard 11 City of Petronila Severe Winter Storms Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Severe Winter Storms Hazard 13 City of Robstown Severe Winter Storms Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Severe Winter Storms Hazard 15 Section 19: Mitigation Action Mitigation Strategy 1 All Participating Jurisdictions Mitigation Actions 4 Unincorporated Nueces County Mitigation Actions 6 City of Agua Dulce Mitigation Actions 50 City of Bishop Mitigation Actions 68 City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 89 City of Driscoll Mitigation Actions 141 City of Petronila Mitigation Actions 162 City of Port Aransas Mitigation Actions 182 City of Robstown Mitigation Actions 201 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Mitigation Actions 247 Section 20: Plan Maintenance Procedures Plan Maintenance Procedures 1 Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Updating 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6 1 If" a SII 1111111111111 11111111111111 rr� l1111111111111 II 0 ru Continued Public Involvement 12 Appendix A: Capability Assessment Appendix B: Public Survey Appendix C: Meeting Documentation Appendix D: Critical Facilities Appendix E: Wildfire Occurrences Appendix F: Adoption Resolution Appendix G: Plan Maintenance Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7 1 If" a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 11111111 III mm1)( i trrrrrrrrrnrrn� III 1lllllll fff 1111 Introduction 1 Scope 4 Introduction Planning Area Nueces County is located on the south central coast of Texas, and has a land area of 842 square miles and a water area of 360 square miles. Figure 1-1. Nueces County Location Map Nueces County's previous Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, or Plan, was part of the regional plan sponsored by Coastal Bend Council of Governments (CBCOG). Due to state preference that plans may not include more than two counties, Nueces County has chosen to prepare a new countywide multi jurisdictional Plan for 2017. Participating jurisdictions in the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan are: • Unincorporated Nueces County, • City of Aqua Dulce, • City of Bishop, • City of Corpus Christi, • City of Driscoll, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 1 1 If" ,n • City of Petronila, • City of Port Aransas, • City of Robstown, and • Port of Corpus Christi Authority (PCCA) The geographic boundaries of the Port Authority are co -extensive with Nueces and San Patricio Counties. The Port Authority exercises jurisdiction over the waterways and public port facilities and all vessels using the waterways. The Authority's waterways mean collectively, the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, the La Quinta Channel, the Jewel Fulton Canal, Rincon Canal and the Intercoastal Waterway. For the purpose of the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan; information presented concerning the PCCA will be limited to the Nueces County portion of their jurisdiction. Additionally, for the purpose of profiling natural hazards on behalf of the PCCA, hazard location, extent, occurrence, probability, impact, and vulnerability will be limited to the PCCA owned parcels. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 2 1 P a 61, Figure 1-2. Planning Area Map A >tn 111111,, 000000e, 0000„„, 0;00000000,000000 , 11111111111111111111111111111111 11101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00000000000000000000000000000001 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 e 'I 11111111 'll'1Yio�,. POR • IIII p INlllli li IN i " '0#001 I0 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 illli II!jiidEll'�''„W 01,6.701001.00640 06,000.600%. 6 6040u0000000,iw06,, 1000c. 1000000,0 N.00 L . o,^0,00000w„0000 l^N MW111.0„o•J1u0ir 40c10.40,n0gt HA'wxiwr.d Nu0e0:4.011 C.0040.10,4 The multi -jurisdictional plan approach is effective in addressing natural hazard risk because the participating jurisdictions generally face the same natural hazards, have similar assets, and have successfully partnered in the past. Plan Participants At least one representative and one staff member from each participating jurisdiction forms the Planning Team. For purposes of defining roles, stakeholders are individuals or groups that are vested in and affected by a mitigation action or policy. Examples of stakeholders include business owners, chamber of commerce, neighborhood associations, Red Cross, hospital districts, and private organizations. Public outreach also plays an important role in the Plan development. Stakeholders and the public were encouraged to participate in the development of the Plan. Section 2 includes a list of Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 3 1 IIP ,n q00 0P Planning Team members and activities and meetings held that involved the Planning Team and the public. Hazard Mitigation Action Planning Nueces County and the jurisdictions therein are susceptible to a wide range of natural hazards, including floods, hurricanes and tropical storms, drought, extreme heat, lightning, coastal erosion, hailstorms, tornados, dam and levee failure, land subsidence, expansive soils, and wildfire. These life-threatening hazards can destroy property, disrupt the economy, and lower the overall quality of life for residence. The impact of hazards can be lessened in terms of their effect on people and property through effective hazard mitigation action planning and implementation. This Plan provides an opportunity for Nueces County and the other participating jurisdictions to evaluate successful mitigation actions and explore opportunities to reduce future disaster loss. Scope The focus of the mitigation action plan is to reduce future losses within Nueces County by identifying mitigation strategies based on a detailed hazard risk analysis, including both an assessment of regional hazards and vulnerability. The mitigation strategies seek to identify potential loss -reduction opportunities. The goal of this effort is to work towards more disaster -resistant and resilient communities throughout Nueces County. The scope of the hazards considered herein are those associated with natural hazards. Other planning frameworks exist in the region for hazards not addressed here, including man-made hazards such as security concerns, critical infrastructure protection, hazardous materials response, medical and public health response to terrorism. Agencies and organizations who may be contacted for further information on these topics include local emergency management agencies, Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs), law enforcement agencies, fire departments, state and public health departments, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, local drinking water suppliers, local offices of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the Coastal Bend Council of Governments. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 1 4 1 P a 111 �I llio1 1/1 ff i�ffffffffffff ii«r�i Jiiiir rur'E miirr0//00 Plan Deve opment 1 Resources and Existing Plans 9 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 10 Plan Development Mitigation planning involves bringing together community leaders to identify natural hazards threatening their community and define key actions to implement with the goal of achieving a more disaster -resistant community. This section provides an overview of the planning process, highlighting key steps as well as providing a detailed description of how stakeholders and the public were involved. Planning Team A conference call was held on December 12, 2016 with participating jurisdictions, and Lockwood Andrews and Newnam (LAN) to identify Planning Team members. The Planning Team members identified include one member from each of the participating jurisdictions (see Table 2-1). Additionally, the call included identifying Plan stakeholders, discussing options for engaging the public, and setting a date for the plan kickoff meeting. The group also reviewed and discussed the previous hazards and mitigation actions included in the 2012 regional CBCOG Plan. Planning Team members were asked to attend all workshops during the planning process. Planning Team members that did not attend workshops were contacted by phone or email, and given a recording of the conference call. Some of the responsibilities of the Planning Team included: completing Capability Assessment Surveys, providing a public survey to the general public, providing input regarding the identification of hazards, ranking hazards, identifying mitigation goals, developing new mitigation strategies, and identifying critical facilities. The Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan was organized using a direct representative model, as Nueces County acted as the direct representative for participating jurisdictions in this effort. Each participating jurisdiction also had a local planning team to execute planning tasks at the local level. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 1 1 If" ,n o�o�o��i�aoo��1� iiiii��i�i��i�i�~ titian i`� 1 1 1 u S ti Nueces County* City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop City of Corpus Christi City of Driscoll City of Petronila City of Port Aransas City of Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority Table 2-1. Planning Team 1111111122111111 Emergency Management Coordinator Mayor Mayor Floodplain Manager Mayor Mayor Emergency Management Coordinator Fire Chief / Emergency Management Coordinator Public Safety Director Manager of Emergency Managment 11111111111 Emergency Management Office of the Mayor Office of the Mayor Development Services Department Office of the Mayor Office of the Mayor Emergency Management Fire Department Security * County Emergency Management Coordinator serves the unincorporated areas of Nueces County and the cities of Agua Dulce, Bishop, Driscoll, and Petronila Planning Process In 2012 the Coastal Bend Council of Governments coordinated a regional HMAP process and secured FEMA approval for participating Counties (including Nueces) and Cities (including Agua Dulce, Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, Port Aransas & Robstown). Recognizing the need for a new plan because of a state preference for plans no larger than one county, then Nueces County Emergency Management Coordinator began informal discussions between other Emergency Management Coordinators within Nueces County on their jurisdiction's interest in participating in a joint HMAP process. Based upon the shared interest in planning together Nueces County submitted a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (DR -4223) to support the cost of hiring a consultant to assist with the planning process/plan development. Each participating jurisdiction included a letter of support for the grant. FEMA/TDEM awarded the grant in August 2016 and the process to create an Inter -local agreement also took place to share the cost and define responsibilities across the jurisdictions. All participating jurisdictions had their governing boards approve the Inter -local agreement and sign onto the planning process in fall of 2016 (including appointment of their HMAP planning team representatives and their local planning team). Also during fall 2016 a request for proposals for consultant services to develop a hazard mitigation action plan. Several proposals were received/evaluated and LAN was selected/awarded the contract. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 2 1 Ii" ,n The process used to prepare this Plan included following steps outlined in the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide (FEMA, 2013). After the Planning Team was organized, a Capability Assessment Survey was developed and distributed at the Kick -Off Workshop on January 4, 2017. Hazards were ranked by both the Planning Team and residents. Specific mitigation strategies were discussed at the Mitigation Workshop on March 29, 2017. Finally, Plan Maintenance and implementation procedures were developed and are included in Section 20. A schedule of planning activities is included as Table 2-2. m�mll'. l m January 4, 2017 March 2, 2017 March 29, 2017 April 26, 2017 May 1, 2017 Table 2-2. Schedule of Planning Tasks 1111111001H 111111111 1llo ,,,, 11111111111111111111011 V119,1u011111 nllli�111111u1'liillll!1 Il, Conduct Kickoff Meeting, Capability Assessment; identify and evaluate hazards; begin drafting MAP Conduct Risk Assessment WebEx Workshop for Planning Team; begin drafting Risk Analysis; review upcoming Mitigation Strategy objectives Conduct Mitigation Strategy WebEx Workshop for Planning Team, work with planning team to complete mitigation worksheets. Provide MAP Draft to Planning Team at public meeting for review and comment Submit MAP Draft to TDEM for review and edits September 2017 (assuming FEMA Approval of PLAN; participating jurisdictions adopt PLAN by FEMA review completed) resolution Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 3 1 P a Kickoff Workshop The Planning Team Kickoff Workshop was a Public Meeting that was held in Nueces County Commissioner's Court Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi on January 4, 2017. Adjacent jurisdictions were invited to attend by the Nueces County Emergency Management Coordinator. Nueces County served as the coordinating jurisdiction on behalf of the planning team. The initial meeting provided an opportunity to inform participating jurisdictions officials and key department personnel about how the planning process pertained to their distinct roles and responsibilities, and also to involve stakeholder groups and the general public. In addition to the kickoff presentation, participants received the following information: • Project overview regarding the planning process; • Public Survey access information; • Hazard Ranking form; • Capability Assessment survey for completion. A hazard ranking exercise was conducted at the Kickoff public meeting to get input from residents and rank natural hazards affecting the planning area. Participants ranked hazards in terms of level of risk, frequency of occurrence, and potential impact. Overall, residents ranked Hurricanes/Tropical Storms as the highest hazard risk followed by Floods, Drought, Windstorms, Extreme Heat, Lighting, Coastal Erosion, Tornado, Hailstorms, Expansive Soils, Dam/Levee Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, and Severe Winter Storms. The Planning Team Kickoff Workshop was well -attended, with members from each of the participating jurisdictions present. Efforts were made to document key participants. The following table highlights participants for each jurisdiction. For a comprehensive list of meeting attendees, meeting handouts, and documentation refer to Appendix D. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 4 1 P a Table 2-3. Kickoff Workshop Participation Summary Unincorporated Nueces County City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop �II, III I� �IIjji 11 Emergency Management Coordinator quudd„ 111111 p uG 11111'i1d1 °d0N�1j1P1 i 1 1111 III 111 Iildliiu1111111111111111 11 11111 ,111 1 111 l Ill lllp 1 1111111111m Office of Emergency Management I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information Mayor Office of Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information Mayor Office of Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 5 1 If" a Table 2-3. Kickoff Workshop Participation Summary (cont.) 1 1;1,11 i1 �! 111 D01101110 111'110 ( I1 (1'1'1111111'1'1r1' 1 HI , 1111111 1111 111111 ! I iV71llllllulll�'ulllll llllllll ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey City of Corpus Department of Access Information Christi Floodplain Manager Developmental ✓ Participated in Hazard Services Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information City of Driscoll Mayor Office of Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment City of Petronila City of Port Aransas ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information Mayor Office of the Mayor ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment Emergency Management Coordinator Office of Emergency Management ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 6 1 If" a Table 2-3. Kickoff Workshop Participation Summary (cont ) olil it 'Ill�lll ,, glnfio City of Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority Fire Chief, Emergency Management Coordinator Director of Port Security Fire Department Security �pQ I 1111111111111111111 ��� ���iill II III ��141111 IIIS � ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment ✓ Present for Plan Overview ✓ Received Public Survey Access Information ✓ Participated in Hazard Ranking Exercise ✓ Received Capability Assessment KRISTV News Channel 6 in Corpus Christi, as well as the Corpus Christi Caller Times Newspaper also attended the Plan Kickoff Workshop. Public outreach efforts that resulted from the participation in the Plan Kickoff Workshop included: • Nueces County's Emergency Management Coordinator was interviewed by the Corpus Christi Caller Times and an article regarding the hazard mitigation project and the request for public input was published in the paper the next day. • Many of the participating jurisdictions posted a link to the public survey on their websites to solicit public input for the Plan. Hazard Identification Hazard identification and ranking was a major component of the Plan Kickoff Meeting. Following the Kickoff Meeting the Planning Team reviewed the public input received concerning the hazard ranking and formulated the final ranked list of natural hazards to be incorporated into the Plan. Hazards identification is documented in detail in Section 3 of this Plan. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 7 1 If" ,n G-318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop On February 14-15, 2017, the Texas Department of Emergency Management held a G- 318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Members from the participating jurisdiction and LAN attended the workshop. Risk Assessment A preliminary risk assessment for the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan was completed in March 2017 and the results were presented to Planning Team members via webinar on March 29, 2017. The resulting risk assessment profiled hazard events, provided information on previous occurrences, estimated probability of future events, and detailed the spatial extent and magnitude of impact on people and property. A hazard profile and vulnerability analysis for each of the natural hazards can be found in Sections 5 through 18 in this Plan. Mitigation Review and Development The mitigation strategy development for the Plan involved creating mitigation goals and new mitigation actions. Previous mitigation actions from the CBCOG regional plan were reviewed as a baseline for new actions, goals, and objectives. The Planning Team reviewed their respective mitigation actions from the previous plan to determine projects that are still viable and may be included in the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan. An inclusive and structured process was used to develop and prioritize mitigation actions for this Plan, including the following steps: 1. Potential mitigation actions were developed and the list narrowed down to those that were most likely to be implemented, most cost-effective in reducing risk, and most likely to receive political and community support. 2. A Problem Statement was developed for each hazard to determine actions to mitigate the specific problem or risk, background information on why the action is needed was documented as well as who (by title) will oversee implementation of the project. Timeframe for implementation was defined and any obstacles to implementation such as local environmental groups opposing the project or lack of community support was identified. 3. Participants were provided an inventory of federal and state funding sources that could potentially assist in implementing the proposed mitigation actions. Planning Team Members considered benefits that would result from the mitigation actions versus the cost of those projects. Economic impact of implementing one action over another was a consideration. 4. Planning Team Members identified and prioritized proposed actions, costs and benefits, effects on existing buildings and future development, implementation schedules, and potential funding sources. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 8 1 P ,n Table 2-4. Planning Team Meeting Attendance Summary 111111111 itr iuii�i 10"""L111 it IL1 II N1111uli1111V Meeting Date Unincorporated Nueces County City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop X X X X City of Corpus Christi X X X X City of Driscoll X X X X City of Petronila X X X X City of Port Aransas X X X X City of Robstown X X X X January 4, 2017 X X March 2, 2017 X X March 29, 2017 X X April 17, 2017 X X Port of Corpus X X X X Christi Authority X = Attended. Detailed attendance records are included in Appendix D. C = Did not attend. Resources and Existing Plans Resources A variety of resources were utilized in compiling the data needed to perform the hazard analysis. Resources included FEMA, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Texas A&M Forest Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the 2011 National Land Cover Database, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), the Texas Geographic Society, the Texas State Data Center, the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM), and local hazard event reports. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 9 1 If" ,n Review of the Nueces County Beach Management and Coastal Erosion Response Plan, Nueces County Coastal Parks Master Plan, Texas Coastwide Erosion Response Plan, Port of Corpus Christi USACE Dredging Report of 2015, Floodplain Management Plan, Storm Water Management Plan, and Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan provided essential data for developing actions to implement and incorporate into the mitigation plan. Incorporation of Existing Plans Current projects and studies were utilized as a starting point for discussing mitigation actions and how to incorporate the Plan into other local planning mechanisms such as budgetary, administrative, and development initiatives. Previous hazard events, occurrences, and hazard risk data were identified through NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), Texas Geographic Society, U.S. Geographic Society, U.S. Department of Agricultural, local reporting, and other sources. The preliminary results were presented at the Risk Assessment webinar in order to facilitate a discussion to help participants develop actions for their jurisdiction. Furthermore, these studies were used as a starting point for suggesting grant and mitigation activities based on local and FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) funding. Assessing Future Community Capabilities Local capability to implement identified mitigation actions can be challenging. Communities can benefit from Mutual Aid Agreements with their neighboring County. This increases their capability to undertake and implement mitigation actions. Executing future cooperative agreements with the County and neighboring jurisdictions to maximize budget and grant monies was discussed at the Mitigation Strategy workshop. Public and Stakeholder Involvement An important component of mitigation planning is public participation and stakeholder involvement. Input from individual citizens and the community as a whole provides the Planning Team with a greater understanding of local concerns and increases the likelihood of successfully implemented mitigation actions. If citizens and stakeholders are involved they are more likely to gain a greater appreciation of the hazards present in their community and take steps to reduce their impact. Neighboring communities as well as local and regional stakeholders were invited via email and phone and provided an overview of the planning process and how they may work with participating jurisdictions to apply for future project funding to implement mitigation projects relative to their specific hazard risks. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 10 1 P a Stakeholders The following groups represent a partial list of organizations invited to provide input into the Plan. ohII�n nnn lov IIIIIlD pr��°010o "fr°ni h " � 11 lo i Unincorporated Nueces County City of Corpus Christi City of Port Aransas Port of Corpus Christi Authority City of Robstown City of Bishop City of Driscoll City of Agua Dulce Table 2-5. Plan Stakeholders o 11111111 City of Petronila Nueces County Coastal Parks Department Nueces County Colonia Initiative Committee Nueces County School Superintendents Nueces County Oso Creek Committee Nueces County Drainage Districts 2 Nueces River Authority Nueces County Fire Chiefs Association Nueces County AgriLife Extension Emergency Management Coordinator Floodplain Manager, Interim Director of Development Services, Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Management Coordinator Director of Port Security, Public Safety Director Fire Chief/ Emergency Management Coordinator, Assistant Fire Chief Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor, City Secretary Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor, Administrative Consultant Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor, City Secretary Emergency Management Coordinator, Mayor Parks Director Director Superintendent CCISD Deputy Executive Director Superintendent Deputy Director Director County Coordinator Public Participation Public involvement in the development of the plan included two public meetings prior to Plan approval and adoption. Public input was sought using three methods: open public Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 11 1 P a meetings; public survey; and the draft Plan was made available for public review on the Nueces County website, as well as other social media platforms. Reaching the segment of the public without access to computers or the Internet was a consideration in garnering public support. In addition to the copies of the draft Plan hosted on planning partner websites, planning partners held paper copies so citizens without internet access had an opportunity to review the plan. Assistance was provided by news coverage from the Corpus Christi Caller Times newspaper. Articles were developed for the local newspaper and posted to news websites. Public Meetings Notices and information regarding the project were also posted in the Corpus Christi Caller Times newspaper. Plan publicity was shared to social media platforms and community websites. Public Participation Survey In addition to the open public meetings, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Plan participants were able to solicit input from citizens and stakeholders through the use of a Public Survey. The survey was designed to obtain data and information from the residents of participating jurisdictions. Participating communities solicited surveys through their websites, social media, and utility bills. Copies of the survey were distributed by local officials and at public meetings. A total of 12 responses to the survey were completed which provided valuable input in the development of the Plan. A summary of the survey findings is provided in Appendix B. Public feedback assisted in driving the direction of hazard profiling, developing mitigation actions for areas of concern expressed in the survey, and allowed for the community to voice their concerns and involve those interested in the HMAP for the participating jurisdictions future involvement. Public feedback was also used in the cost -benefit analysis and prioritization of mitigation actions by factoring public opinion into the ranking criteria. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 2 12 1 P a 00 Ill Hazard Identification 1 Risk Assessment Overview 5 Hazard Identification The purpose of this section is to provide background information for the hazard identification process, as well as descriptions for the natural hazards identified. Upon a review of the full range of natural hazards suggested under FEMA planning guidance, the participating jurisdictions identified 14 hazards that are to be addressed in the Plan. These hazards were identified utilizing input from Planning Team members, and a review of the current State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan ("State Plan"). Readily available online information from reputable sources such as federal and state agencies was also evaluated to supplement information as needed. Based on this review, 14 hazards were identified as significant. IIU Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Table 3-1. Hazard Descriptions 1 Flood 2 11111111111111 11 111111111111111111 111 Hurricanes and tropical storms are intense tropical weather systems that produce damaging winds, generate storm surge, and heavy rainfall. A flood is the accumulation of water within a body of water, which results in the overflow of excess water onto adjacent lands, usually floodplains. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake or other watercourse susceptible to flooding. Flooding is the partial or complete inundation of otherwise normally dry land. Types of flooding include riverine, coastal, and shallow flooding. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 1 1P ,n III 111111111 111111 II II II HI 1111 OD 111 Table 4-1. Hazard Descript ons (Cont.) Drought 3 Windstorms II B l llillllll Droughts can be classified as meteoro og'ca , hydrolog'cal, agricultural, or socioeconomic droughts. A meteorolog cal drought is a reduction of precipitation from the expected average or typical precipitation patterns. A hydrologic drought occurs when below average rainfall impacts streams, lakes, reservoirs, and groundwater levels. Agricultural droughts are brought on by insufficient moisture in the soil, typically impacting crops. Socioeconomic droughts occur when water demand exceeds supply due to a precipitation -related supply shortfall. Droughts may initiate or exacerbate other hazards, such as extreme heat or wildfires. A windstorm is a storm with high winds or violent gusts with little or no rain. The windstorm hazard excludes extreme 4 wind events that occur with other wind -related natural hazards such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornados which are addressed elsewhere in this plan. Extreme Heat 5 Lightning 6 Coastal Erosion 7 1 Texas Natural Resources Code, Section 33.601 Extreme heat is the condition whereby temperatures hover ten degrees or more above the average high temperature in a region for an extended period. If extreme heat conditions persist, it may be considered a heat wave. Lightning is a sudden electrostatic discharge during an electrical storm between electrically charged regions of a cloud, between that cloud and another cloud, or between a cloud and the ground. Coastal erosion is the "loss of land, marshes, wetlands, beaches, or other coastal features within the coastal zone because of the actions of wind, waves, tides, storm surges, subsidence, or other forces"1. Coastal erosion may result in the temporary redistribution of coastal sediments, or the long-term loss of coastal sediments and sediment accumulation. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 2 1 If" ,n III 111111111 111111 II II II HI 1111 OD 111 Table 4-1. Hazard Descript ons (Cont.) Tornado II B l llillllll A tornado 's a violently rotating co umn of air extend ng between, and in contact with, a cloud and the surface of the 8 earth. Tornadoes have wind speeds of 250 miles per hour or more. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide and 50 miles long. Hailstorm 9 Expansive Soils 10 Dam Failure 11 2 NOAA Hail is a form of precipitation that occurs when updrafts in thunderstorms carry raindrops upward into extremely cold areas of the atmosphere where they freeze into ice. Nearly all severe thunderstorms produce hail aloft, though it may melt before reaching the ground. Multi -cell thunderstorms produce many hailstones, but not usually large hailstones. In the life cycle of the multi -cell thunderstorm, the mature stage is relatively short so there is not much time for growth of the hailstone. Supercell thunderstorms have sustained updrafts that support large hail formation by repeatedly lifting the hailstones into the very cold air at the top of the thunderstorm cloud. In general hail 2 inches (5 cm), a little larger than golf ball, or larger in diameter is associated with supercells. Non-supercell storms are capable of producing golf ball size hail. In all cases, the hail falls when the thunderstorm's updraft can no longer support the weight of the ice. The stronger the updraft the larger the hailstone can growl. Expansive soils contain minerals such as clay that are prone to large volume changes (swelling and shrinking). Soils with a high content of expansive minerals can shrink in drier seasons forming deep cracks. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging subsidence. A dam is a barrier that is constructed to hold back water. A dam failure is a systematic failure of a dam structure resulting in the uncontrolled release of water, often resulting in floods that could exceed the 100 -year flood plain boundaries. A levee is an embankment built to prevent overflow from a body of water. A levee failure is when a levee embankment fails, or is intentionally breached, causing the previously contained water to flood the land... Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 3 1 If" ,n 111 ! IIVW hl l llll 11 11 l hill Table 4-1. Hazard Descriptions (Cont. Dam Fa ure (cont. 11 Land Subsidence 12 Wildfire ...behind the levee. Land subsidence is the decrease in the lands surface elevation due to the loss of subsurface support. Land subsidence can be caused by both natural processes and manmade actions. Land subsidence caused by natural processes typically occurs over a long period of time, usually thousands to millions of years. Short-term land subsidence is generally the result of manmade actions such as: excessive ground -water withdrawal, oil and gas drilling, mining operations, collapse of buried infrastructure like pipelines for water, sewer and storm or the leakage of underground pipes that erode adjacent soils. Subsidence from groundwater withdrawal and oil and gas production usually occur over large areas, while subsidence from collapsed or leaking pipelines is generally localized. A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire almost exclusively fueled by natural vegetative fuels. Fuel may come in the form of grass, brush, or tress. Wildfire risk increases with high concentrations of connected fuels. Meteorological 13 conditions such as high temperatures, low humidity, droughts, and high wind can also increase wildfire risk. Humans are the most common source of initial ignition in wildfires. Sparks from agricultural, industrial, or automobile activity may start a wildfire. Severe Winter Storms 14 3 State of Texas Mitigation Plan Update 2013 A severe winter storm event is defined as a storm with snow, ice, or freezing rain. Severe winter storms are rare for the Texas Coastal area. Sever winter storms may include snowstorms, blizzards, cold waves and ice storms. Snowstorms include four or more inches of snow in a 12 - hour period. Blizzards are characterized by low temperatures and strong winds in excess of 35 mph with large amounts of drifting snow. A cold wave is a winter cold front with a drastic drop in temperature. An ice storm occurs when rain falls out of the warm and moist upper layers of the atmosphere into a cold and dry layer near the ground.3 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 4 1 IP a S Risk Assessment Overview The risk assessment includes seven general parameters that are described for each hazard; description, location, extent, occurrence, probability, impact, and vulnerability. Frequency of return, or probability, was calculated by dividing the number of events in the recorded time period for each hazard by the overall time period that the resource database recorded events. Applicable hazard profiles include a description of a general vulnerability assessment. Vulnerability is the total of assets that are subject to damages from a hazard (based on historic recorded damages). Assets in the region were inventoried and defined in hazard zones where appropriate. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 3 5 1 P a 1.111111. 1111111 otf1f1r�f fmumm mu ff imhim�i ' 11% rrietnt Vulnerable Assets Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Existing Assets 3 City of Agua Dulce Existing Assets 4 City of Bishop Existing Assets 5 City of Corpus Christi Existing Assets 6 City of Driscoll Existing Assets 7 City of Petronila Existing Assets 8 City of Port Aransas Existing Assets 9 City of Robstown Existing Assets 10 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Existing Assets 11 Vulnerable Future Assets 12 Special Population Considerations 12 Vulnerable Assets Overview Vulnerable assets are those that are susceptible to damage and loss from hazard events. A community's vulnerability to a natural hazard is measured as a function of that community's existing and future vulnerable assets including, but not limited to, populations, critical and non-critical infrastructure, property, and systems. Quantifying existing assets is the first step in defining a community's vulnerability to natural hazards. Existing assets are defined below for the county and participating jurisdictions. The City of Corpus Christi is the county seat and the largest city in the county. Populations for the unincorporated county and participating jurisdictions are included in the Existing Asset sections below. A description of the county land cover is shown in Table 4-1. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 1 1 If" ,n Table 4-1 — Nueces County Land Cover' \ 1\Q11111 111111111111111 10\\\11111111 \ 1\11111. (1111 \\II 11 � 1 1 1 �m 0 � �� An t�� �¢ , , Residential 2.86% Commercial and Industrial 8.98% Agricultural 47.21% Forested, Shrub, and Grassland 7.88% Wetlands 4.09% Unknown and Barren 2.06% Water 26.97% Critical Facilities For the purpose of hazard mitigation, FEMA defines critical facilities as hospitals, fire stations, police stations, courthouse, communications, and similar facilities where essential programs/services are provided. Other facilities such as public schools may be deemed by a community to be a critical facility as well. These facilities should be given special consideration when formulating regulatory alternatives and floodplain management plans. A critical facility should not be located in a floodplain if at all possible. If located in a floodplain it should be provided a higher level of protection so that it can continue to function and provide services during and after a flood. Hazard mitigation actions to mitigate risk to critical facilities located in the 100 -year floodplain, or potentially impacted by future flood conditions, are included in this Plan by jurisdiction. Critical Facilities are tabulated in Appendix D of the Plan. 1 Homer, C.G., Dewitz, J.A., Yang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Xian, G., Coulston, J., Herold, N.D., Wickham, J.D., and Megown, K., 2015, Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States - Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 81, no. 5, p. 345-354 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 2 1 IP ,n S Unincorporated Nueces County Existing Assets SSSSSS\\\alnttaSS\S.. 15,274 (Unincorporated) *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] Unincorporated Nueces County figure represents the balance of the total population in the county, less each individual jurisdiction participating in the plan. sssssmmarmrzzaanmsss. sassErmassa assauttnalms Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 132.85 Miles 84.29 Miles 312,734.7 Acres; $76,735,126 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 masssttztaatsslssm .��mu,� an ,, u..11``1111111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� 1 � �1111011111\100100 111\ 0\ 1lunta01\(11 111110\������`�,�,���1��11,��0����1���\����,1���,1��,1,�,,�,��',��,�,1�1�,��,,�����111�,�����1�,11��,�1„�\0��� ittnemmmn����1�1,�,��1��1,1�1�11��\�„����� 8210 $406,888,603 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll 4,202 $487,429,634 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 3 1 If” a City of Agua Dulce Existing Assets lantarartnanall 820 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSSZZZMEMMEn\SSSS SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 1.15 Miles Rail Crop Land* 0 Miles 2.45 Acres; $602 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x r1� nmwImrmzwinialmeamaretm111 11011\�00100 \ 0\ �1111 1\\1\(11 11 1 111������1`�,�,�1�\��1\,��0����1���\����,\��1,1,��,�,1�\1,��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��,�11�\0�\��„1,�,;1,��1�����1��,��\�,��1�1�1,��,�„`�„�1�1,�\���1�\1,`\�����1�1„�,��1��„1� 221 $17,541,361 259 $20,771,243 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 4 1 If” a City of Bishop Existing Assets SISMSSZ nanall 3,150 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSS 11111111MMEntan. SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 2.9 Miles Rail Crop Land* 2.5 Miles 539.02 Acres; $132,258 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) sstsssmazrotzotaarrltrastsas\m\\. ��������� � m m m . �� mu �� � � � � � 11``11 ntl\111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������1\01\1\\�1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\1�\1�1\11\1\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 1 � �1111011111\� 00100111\ 0� �warm Ituremann\11�(11 1111101\�����1`�,�,�1�\��1\,��0����1���\����,\��1\\��,,�,,�,���,��,�\\�,1\��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��\�11�\0�\� ����1�1„�,��1��\,1�\�\�1�1\,����1 466 $115,889,915 1,162 $99,373,071 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 5 1 If” a City of Corpus Christi Existing Assets SSSS\SrartnaaSS\ 324,074 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSSZZZMEMMEn\SSSS SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 381.6 Miles Rail Crop Land* 50.06 Miles 24,632.44 Acres; $6,044,014.65 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x 1 1� � � 10 11 0 1 WEVIS 00100 111\ 0\� 111111 1\\1\1 1111 1 11101�\����,\��1,1��,1,�,,�,���,��,�,1�\1,��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��,�11�\0�\� 11111111�\��1��,��\�,��1�1�1,��,�„`�„�1�1,�\���1�\1,`\�����1�1„�,��1��„1�,�\�1\1„����1 28,382 $7,148,005,369 82,947 $10,238,656,508 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 6 1 If” a City of Driscoll Existing Assets SISMSSZ nanall 752 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSS 11111111MMEntan. SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 2.96 Miles Rail Crop Land* 1.41 Miles 464.67 Acres; $114,014.81 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x r1� nmwImrmzwinialmeamaretm111 11011\�00100 \ 0\ �1111 1\\1\(11 11 1 111������1`�,�,�1�\��1\,��0����1���\����,\��1,1,��,�,1�\1,��,,�����11\�,�����\�,11��,�11�\0�\��„1,�,;1,��1�����1��,��\�,��1�1�1,��,�„`�„�1�1,�\���1�\1,`\�����1�1„�,��1��„1� 272 $25,502,273 221 $13,255,055 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 7 1 If” a City of Petronila Existing Assets SSSS\SrartnaaSS\ 114 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSSZZMttMtMn\SSSS. SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 132.85 Miles 84.29 Miles 926.66 Acres; $227,373.01 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census Published 2012) tstxx.\\sm. sasstainnassx‘xissssttztttss\s.\.\\x 111 10 11 01 0 1 11\� 00100 111 \ 0\ � 11\� 111111 1 \\1\ (1 1 1 11 (1 1 1 1 11 � 0 114 $3,714,796 38 $3,201,138 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 8 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Existing Assets SISMSSZ nanall 3,955 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] S\SSSSS 111 M n\SSSS SSSSSMSSSS1.\SSSSSIIInSISS Major Roadways 9.58 Miles Rail 0 Miles Crop Land* 0 Acres; $0 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 m111111stettaltalsax‘x m .��mu,� an ,, u..��� � 11``11X11111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� 1 � �1111011111\100100 111\ 0\ 1zeta ttnrmmtnn01\(11 111110\������`�,�,���1��11,��0����1���\����,1���,1��,1,�,,�,��',��,�,1�1�,��,,�����111�,�����1�,11��,�1„�\0��� ����1�1,�,��1��1,1�1�11��\�„����� 6,621 $414,531,219 2,768 $774,547,552 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 9 1 If” a City of Robstown Existing Assets SSSSSSZ El 11,576 *Source: U.S. Census Bureau [2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates] SttISSMMIMZMIMMSSSS SSSSSIMISSSSSI SSSSWIIZISSSS% Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 42.80 Miles 12.46 Miles 6,580.37 Acres; $1,614,612.05 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 mISSISTIMMESSIS%\% m .�� mu ,� an ,, u..��� � 11``11X11111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� � �111 0 11\100100 111 \ 0\ 1ymtn1 (11 1 11 11 0\������`�,�,���1��11,��0����1����1�,��1,��,�1�11��\�„����� 2,118 $151,390,423 3,188 $183,445,540 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 10 1 If” a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Existing Assets N/A SSISSSS\\MIMMIEMMISSS IISSSSSIZMSSSSMIISSSVIIIIISISMS Major Roadways Rail Crop Land* 10.4 Miles 27.4 Miles 0 Acres; $0 Value *Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 1 0\\\0\\ 111 11111110001\01111111111 1111111/0/ \1010 �1111111�\\11011 1\�1�\01�11111� 0011110111111111111111\. 0\ 1\11 (111 ( 0111 1 1111 1\ 11\1\1111 \1 (01 \ D 1 1 1) 11 1 1 1 4 � 4 V � � I ����1��`��`��`���`����`�������������������������������1``��i1��1��`��1�����`����1����1��1������`���1��1�����1������1�1�1��1������1�������������������� ���`��1���1��`�������������������������������� ola 111 »ol 111 11 1 11 �1 1 1 1 misassitztamasasm .�� mu,� an ,, u..��� � 11``11X11111\`����1��`��`��`���`����`����\���������11\1\1\�1`\1\\�l\����\\11\0�1\1��\\1�\�11\1�1\1������������0������������������� 11\\\11\111\\\\\\1\111\\��`\\\\1\\110����1����`������0��������� 111 10 11 01 0 1 11\1 00100 111 \ 0\ 1 11\1 111111 1 01\ (1 1 1 11 (1 1 1 1 11 � 0 �`,,��1�1,�����1�� 245 $174,026,681 0 $0 *Nueces County Appraisal District, 2016 Appraisal Roll Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 11 1 If" a Vulnerable Future Assets Future growth and development in the county may affect hazard vulnerability. For identification of a community's future assets, it is useful to consider anticipated population growth, development trends, and planning and development management efforts. Based on population projections for the county planning area provided by the Texas State Data Center, the county, overall, is expected to grow approximately 1`)/0 annually from 2015 to 2040. Nueces County experiences steady growth in development including services to support the tourism industry, oil and gas industry, port activity, and agricultural land. Future assets is another important matrix to access a jurisdiction's vulnerability to natural hazards. With development comes the need to address the risk of natural hazards for larger populations and increased numbers of non-critical and critical facilities. Historically, hurricanes, tropical storms, and flooding has been a widespread problem for the Plan area; potential for these hazards creates limitations for urban land uses. A goal of community officials in the Plan area is to develop strategies to ensure that future development has reduced risk of impact by natural hazards while not inhibiting community growth. Vulnerability including potential dollar losses is defined for each hazard by jurisdiction in Sections 5 through Section 18 of this Plan. Special Population Considerations While the Port of Corpus Christi Authority lacks a resident, Census -recognized population, there is a significant working population that would be impacted by any natural hazards affecting the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. According to a 2015 study,2 the Port of Corpus Christi generated 13,770 direct jobs. Many of these 13,770 employees would be expected to be located on PCCA property for significant periods of time. Some of the jurisdictions in the plan are tourist destinations. The Cities of Corpus Christi and Port Aransas have significant seasonal tourist populations. These non -permanent populations may be more hazard -vulnerable than resident populations. Unlike residents, tourists are not as familiar with the community and its hazards and may not know how the appropriate measures to take to protect themselves from natural hazards. 2 http://portofcc.com/wp-content/uploads/CorpusChristi2016_FINAL-1.pdf Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 4 12 1 P a 111.111.1.1. 1111,111- 1 )111111111111,111110 ,11111,1111 11111111110 �ii11111 1111 iii Illi��rJlllllllrralllllllllllll111111 �l��1111111111111111111 11111""""111 I���llllllllllllll 11111111111 �I •,1„,1•„•„•„•„•,.1•„•„•„,„•„•„•„•,.„1„.„.„1„.„.„,"•,,, jUl1i�ll 11111111 1111111 Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Hazard 7 City of Bishop Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Hazard 14 City of Petronila Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hazard 18 City of Robstown Hazard 20 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hazard 22 Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard Overview Description Hurricanes and tropical storms are intense tropical weather systems that produce damaging winds, generate storm surge, and heavy rainfall. Location Hurricanes and tropical storms do not have a specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to hurricane and tropical storm activity. According to FEMA Wind Zones in the United States, the entirety of Nueces County is identified as a Hurricane -Susceptible Region and is located in Wind Zone III, associated to winds as high as 200 mph. The effects of a hurricane can be felt as far as 150 miles from the center of the storm. The most damaging effects of a storm, both in terms of wind damage and storm surge, are likely to be felt within the radius of maximum wind (RMW). The average RMW of Atlantic hurricanes has been observed to be about 30 miles1. A 30 mile buffer applied to the storms that have occurred in the planning area encompasses the entire planning area. Consequently, the entire planning area should be considered at risk of hurricane or tropical storm damage. 1 Source: A Note on the Radius of Maximum Wind for Hurricanes, S.A. Hsu and Zhondge Yan, 1998 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 1 111 ,n Z Figure 5-1. FEMA Wind Zones in the United States I/*I 4.0.4.47 fl MAW f J(01, 6,149,10 WIND ZONES IN IKE UNITED SUNS* 1111111111111111111111111111111111111'111 ....i.,,,,q,1„:ii;!•;)„,!,1,1:„.!;,:iiiiii"11.111f 11111 1 11111111111111111111,liihii .„.11 l;',""", s .'"1:11.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.111.111.1111 --4,44:1,4:114 11111111:1010 .1111,11.1. l'".111011111111111111111111111111111111111"llioii"1"1, 011,11111',1111:1,::::::111,111° 1,11111111111111111111111111111 ( OAVRI*0 1111111111111,1111111111, '111111111111 111 141141414111100'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'100111111'1'1'11'1'1'!'1'1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'111111111111 1111111v11111111111111'1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1114, 111111111111111111 444111011111111000000000111111111111110001101004, 6441.11,1.1 11111 .1111111011111111111110 144 11111111111111111111111111 1V1110 111111 11111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 JA 1111 '1?0,0110101110,0000,01111H0,11 // 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,1111111111111111111111111 11111 111111:111'1 111111111111111111111'11 1441,4,4,4„4,41,4,44,4,4,44 •,,,:•''..1,3 * 1 //.1 / A, z ,,,m44:—.1 ALASAA• , .,,,,.. .:..... / Wehify riddaid y4i l'041411.11,111,441„, 111 HMINAO '(r4,14,444,44,444,4, CITHFR )P3 N4 %so sof 'Aslosso misnooss ouess.sibeys geAseolgasse moose ' Clogogm woo ;vow mommovwroi,"6 affo coromma wow, As6CE 4.• NUECES - 3s-mmod 9,01, tore *tom fo.:5,0r COUNTY fichowv, 11.4. 4041DZOOrtES zoom • • ••••0',..."'"' 4.440,7 ZONE N rifjk 014,Pv, 1111111111111111111111 11 The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) was established under the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) by the Texas Legislature in 1971 following Hurricane Celia. TWIA provides windstorm and hail insurance along the Texas seacoast. Recommended design and inspection requirements for structures along the coast have been developed by TDI based on historical damages. Three designated catastrophe areas have been defined for Nueces County. Designated catastrophe areas are established for territories subject to unusually frequent and severe damage resulting from windstorm or hailstorms. Designated catastrophe areas for Nueces County include: Seaward, Inland I, and Inland II. Adopted design wind speeds for these designated catastrophe areas are shown in Figure 8-2 and defined below: • Seaward: 130 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland I: 120 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland II: 110 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 2 1 IP a g e Figure 5-2 TDI Designated Catastrophe Areas • Corpus Christi 1101vvvvvvoll \�\ Extent Inland II Inland I Seaward Hurricane intensity is categorized by the Saffir-Simpson Scale, ranked 1 — 5, in order of lowest to highest wind speed. This scale, while it is based on a limited suite of characteristics of hurricane intensity, provides an informative framework with which hurricanes can be discussed. Category 3, 4, and 5 storms are considered to be the most dangerous hurricanes. There is a significant potential for property damage and loss of life associated with Category 3 -5 storms. Only 20% of the total tropical hurricane landfalls are from Category 3-5 storms, yet Category 3-5 storms have caused 70% of the hurricane -related damage in the United States. Category 1 and 2 storms, while generally not as dangerous as Category 3-5 storms, still require consideration and preparation. For example, Hurricane Ike was a Category 2 storm, yet was the third most destructive hurricane to make landfall in the United States. Table 5-1 describes Saffir-Simpson Scale hurricane categories and associated storm surge estimates. Historically strong Category 3 storms have occurred throughout the planning area. Given the planning area's coastal location, the participating jurisdictions could potentially experience a Category 5 storm in the future. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 3 1 P a Table 5-1. Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale2 111111 lllll 1 2 3 4 5 »0II0000000I,,JlII1llllIlI0IIII I,000 !IIlll1i.0II1.;1!1u0°IIIbtiItiItiIti�u0I uIIlIlIl�l,,,lsssslll:0���yy��i0.:ti01ssti»III1«IIIII' 10;�V»Iplll11�i««lllsl`o"Il0,���ll0iu��0l,,,,,,,,01 uuiluuu 11ttttttttttuum11, IIII IIII 111�111II 74-95 96-110 111-129 130-155 157+ Occurrences The typical Atlantic hurricane season runs from June to October. While the majority of storms occur within this range, storms have occurred outside of this window. Between 1842 and 2016, a total of 14 unique storms crossed the planning area. A detailed breakdown of storms by intensity and jurisdiction is presented in Table 5-2. No Category 4 or Category 5 Hurricanes crossed the planning area during this time. ww��I IIS 0u.111,0iu 1),0iu00uugllPViilpiiqi ulpIllllIIIIl0 P„ I III�IIII Jurisdiction Nueces County 14 7 Probability The annual probability and reoccurrence intervals of tropical storms and hurricanes is presented in Table 5-3. Probability and reoccurrence intervals are calculated by dividing the number of events by the observation period. It should be noted that these probabilities reflect the previous occurrence of the center of a storm tracking over a jurisdiction. In actuality, due to the size of these storms, the impacts would be felt across the planning area. Table 5-2. Historical Occurrences3 UI , 000,00,0„o„,„ 0010 HMO 1 i011nIhD IIII�uti" V,� Puu0� 00i0,�Nu� 111n'71I lII Il0jlu�ll101lll 11 ln'101;'01010l IIII 111°°00011°01111°111"IPI1i Total Tropical Storms & Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Storms Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 2 3 2 Landsea, C.W., Pielke, R.A. Jr., Mestas-Nunez, A.M., Knaff, J.A. (1999) Atlantic Basin Hurricanes: Indices of Climatic Changes. Climactic Change, 42:89-129. 3N 0AA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 4 1 li" ,n Jurisdiction Nueces County 8% 4% Impact Nueces County is a coastal county; the entire planning area will be vulnerable to the impacts of wind brought on my hurricanes and tropical storms. While all jurisdictions are impacted by hurricanes and tropical storms, the impacts felt by each jurisdiction may vary depending upon the characteristics of a particular storm. Storm surge travels with the storm and may make landfall ahead of the center of the storm. Storm surge can cause severe flooding in coastal areas; impacting the jurisdictions along the coast. Additionally, hurricanes and tropical storms produce large amounts of rain. This rain can overwhelm drainage systems. Even hurricanes or tropical storms that have weakened after making landfall can continue to drop significant quantities of water. This water can lead to flooding. The impacts to communities from a category 5 storms could be near complete destruction of any and all assets. Houses and commercial property could be destroyed. In addition to the destruction of property, populations can be displaced if their homes are destroyed. Power and other utilities can be interrupted, even by lower category storms. Crops can be severely damaged, resulting in economic impacts. Table 5-3. Reoccurrence Probability uuull���lllldi�}l}}}}}i11III1 ,,111 1I i" IIIII11ollu I' iii iiooiii ooiii ulll� u�iiu���lllllliii�uulh11ll l ' u11111.1 '1'1'1'1'1'1'1'11'1 iuii«uuliIIII�''"�`I`"'� '�pl1munlll������IIIII1Im��u�uIII111 111 Future Trop -cal Storms Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Storms & Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 1.1% 1.7% Vulnerability Due to Nueces County being located on the Texas coast and the size and power of hurricanes and tropical storms, particularly category 4 and 5 storms, all assets within the participating jurisdictions are vulnerable to potential damage by hurricanes and tropical storms. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 5 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\tllta\S\SSSIII.IM\\\\\\\... ssswmntsssl ssztattErransi County Wide (Unincorporated) Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 Total Storms 12 SSISSISIAISSSSM Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 7 1 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 2 ssstssz=tnss\s Future Storms 6.9% Tropical Storms & Depressions 4% Category 1 Hurricanes 0.6% Category 2 Hurricanes Category 3 Hurricanes 1.2% 1.2% slasssminuttnsal lastamtnas lastrtianan lastaxannals 8210 SISTEMEMSal 423,946.09 $487,429,634 tS�F�YT tif7�Y $406,888,603 ISISSIMISSIS1 Mat 2111nal 84.29 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 6 1 If" a 1 "Mil 01 Figure 5-3. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for Unincorporated Nueces County (1842 — 2016) 1.1'I11i1:114111111111111 H. 44 MIN ft 1 dill '111117 " oloyoh0 0000000000 0000000111111 11111111111111111111111111 a,m„Iw"11111111111111111111 IVV1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 41111pi WfW �mkrI0il9dl�l'tiwY1l0o.°lo, i!'��I�AI�M�K;IqTuwOl� h ul1!i"f;Gl , llllPolI.IIlII�l V IVIIuIIII�, IIII1111111u0 l 01 10 rtItt ru "ipp4 ry Ivvvvro ii�'�i ;ui 116 1141111111 1111111M 011 .0,10001000000000000 ,00,000,00, 0000000 u" ! d d!"t01rw�" 1 �Illul 0110000100000 ...,000 0000 111 FSI ,1111 .111111111111111111111111111111111 VNII' Ju Ilp/u IY i, E r itiv,40 mod i01011 I IH,azard m n9,000,40 A,Oon P +n'-0wtit,,4 140.voon.Con01.y #,Its car•ve% rropmc,;ty0 Storms Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 7 1 P ,n d' mv' City of Agua Dulce Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\tlltta\S\SSIII.IM\\\\\\\ssswmntsssl ssztarznyansi City Wide Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 0 ISSISSI1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 0 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 0% SSSSSMllalltnS\SS\ Tropical Storms & Depressions Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 820 xsalntrn\SS\ 221 SSIVE2111SISS' 218.3 Category 3 Hurricanes 1 1 0 ���"��\�11�\��1�1�\l1\\1 \111\11\O\\11\\1�` $ 20, , 711 243 liztr 1 $17,541,361 MSS AIMS saw tartassal Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 8 1 If" a Figure 5-4. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Agua Dulce (1842 — 2016) f i'N%4// o,, „� ,...�, ,, ��r%/; t nnS�yn )/iNaG/., �� ,.. ,, �➢,.: r 6 /, ���1<>i� � ;.,. :�, l h!J,..: '�, ,, � hr„,,..�,'/�. '� ,./ ��lfw.'r,w/,,,r�r'r , „/a.:%1l�✓1 /'/'' � ///'� rr � 1 / , /c J/1ff J-�a;,�,//i-lii,�I/r1%��;'//�r,� 1�/j j✓%,O,G,I,,f.y''��f�,/rr/,,i,rl,-�,/,,r/,qr�/n����//�ofi�r�%„m��lp*:i:,..o�//o/�//^nrr!' �l,.7���/�l�fJ�fl�/�!��,:J/�/i o/ris`�ri�1Jr�p.rn INDIANA; "01011/1 IN/IGuI �/�//// Il� Gl)f�11' i.. / r i� I f ���',r�;='-% r lwu w/J fIF/ //;;✓ ;,l r, �i;i W ,,. ';� �I ;i, , f I� /�Ur%, (uJ'���'(�///�// r r �rrr�u rl �� od�� r w, ! , rr wI rw 9 r rwJ, ' Nueces County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 5 9 If" a g e City of Bishop Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSdim.\t 11 City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 Mt a SU Total Storms 1 ISISSIS 1 SSSSM Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 ssss\ss=ttssss Future Storms 0.6% Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% ISSISSIV M SSIMMIDASSS MSC ti MISS% ISIVITEMIASS 466 ISS1I t S 4 MSS! r 111 ISSN 2.9 Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes Category 3 Hurricanes SIMI" MN MIMI 423,946.09 tre • r $99,373,071 IV YT rirY211k $115,889,915 MIMI 1 MIME ,N 2.5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 10 1 If" a Figure 5-5. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Bishop (1842 — 2016) 11000001111111101011j11 1 111 iimll 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000100011 1111 1,"'uIIPI luuoli (I�I�IIIIIIIIII 1„001„10.100001001.1.111010000000100000110000101111111111'111 A1y11A uuuuuuulllll II111 101 10 1111111111111111 1111 1111111111 e w 100,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11i (11� 1111I � 11!III1 H 1111 Ilii Ii 1! 1°l jl�fop4i 1 i' { �Jil' ull0u 11'11111111: 111111111111111111111111111111111111111.!it.I'l 111 1111" 111 1,111111111 111IIIl'ly I 1 1�a9aIP 11lll III11ll!,il1a li poljjiii11111'lllIIII11IIlll 'II' lulllll III 1111 �'1i 111}i1vy11I 1111„u1,i'1,11111ll1 Ii Ii 1�11 11' I,f , 11 Ili �1 p 1111111, ni I 111111 �I! �itll 11.110 lI(I it ll �m111111111111 muuuuly 1.11.11.111l111.111.11.11,1 .. '1111111111111111111 1111')1 111111111111111111110,010,010,0100 .,111;111,11;111;111;, 111111111111111i1llpl'ilii. 11111111111111111011111 ®n 11111111 11111111111111111.11,111 III �ll��� 111111 11 mN 111 dn1,014 ,Alun#44;*no4+, 1.111.4,oel "olto:lri A4tooa I01,31a'e�, weiwmn Iwl„wataa s a p„,raRr 44.:Amcanc. 45, �Y�UI MM'"�Wa yrAYAllXlrl:uuoirwn. wrvuww,, �ouiy,w, u 111111111111111111111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 11 1 P City of Corpus Christi Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSdim.S\t slaw m nassi ssz tat :Err nal City Wide Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 11 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 4 2 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 3 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 6.3% Tropical Storms & Depressions 2.3% Category 1 Hurricanes 1.2% Category 2 Hurricanes Category 3 Hurricanes 1.2% 1.7% sssssssxzm=Ass assininsal samminsta satuninss 28,382 ISS11211111111WSIMI: r ranSI 381.6 ssuratmasu 322,267.1 ntmau $10,238,897,626 tS�F�YT tif7�Y $7,148,763,878 MUPam ISMS 50.06 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 12 1 If" a Figure 5-6. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Corpus Christi (1842 — 2016) Y �Y�. illl pM ..1,1,1,11,1,1)))111111111111111 1y7 l1.11111111.1111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.1111111111.11111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11,7,...„„„„„„, ii purtyl;; !I els w°Vi I !! 1111111111111111111111111111111111uuuuurs �iR�i!flMuu � 11111111111111111 IIS ao��� MIO �IVII u+l`! an^a141Ve 1111111111 Ii1141N�(�i'" **OA 0,4140f Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 13 1 P ,n d' e City of Driscoll Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\t ISSISSIII \\MIX\ slaw m nassi ssz tat :Err nal City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 0 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Depressions Hurricanes Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 0 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 0% SSSSSMllalltnS\SS\ Tropical Storms & Depressions Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 752 InISSxsal 11 =MS% 272 ISS1121211111111SIMI: r r MSS% 2.96 744.7 Category 3 Hurricanes 1 1 0 ���"��\�11�\��1�1�\l1\\1 \111\11\Oun $13, , 255055 liztr 1 $25,502,273 ta inn= 1.41 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 14 1 If" a Figure 5-7. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Driscoll (1842 — 2016) 1101 10001,110101 11°1°11111°!°11:°111:i°1°11.111' :(111111111111.111011111111111111100000100 001 000010181010 m0 00;1111,111111111111111111 � �i 1 11111I OO>1 ' �� �11iIIIRTIIRr�((r?III,, IL �IIIIIIIII�III1'l� 0 0111111111111111111110 001000000000000 000 111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 1111111111111111 11 1111111111111111111 111111111111111111 11 001110000000000000000 000000 01 010010 1001 1011111111111111111100000000011 01111111111111111111 110 0011111 °11011 1011011110110110°010000011010111,111111 1111 010101011 '111110 1111 '1111 1'1'1'1'1'1' q'III 8981,100 illll'1 I1� 1111111111 111111111100111 010001 1111111111111111111111111 1114 101000,10101111111111110100010 1111011111{11111111111.1.0, 11 Iii10011„1,01, 00,11000 1111111111111111 N"0011100000100'"""°:10 01101001 MMN11110101010100000000 11 11111 00111111110011111111111m11111111111111111 11111111111 1 010000,101 ,004400,40,0, 0400000090000000,00000 "PaM 4".. W,r.1011510.� Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 15 1 P a City of Petronila Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\tlltta\S\SSIII.IM\\\\\\\ssswmntsssl ssztattErransi City Wide Inland 1 ISTECIASI Total Storms 3 ISSISSI1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 2 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms 1.7% Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 1.2% SSSSSSMVCZM=n\SS SSICIZZIZASSS 114 xsalntrn\SS\ 114 ISS1121211111111SIMI: In MSS% 1167.61 Category 3 Hurricanes lcumnamtmau $3,201,138 liat mirtau $3,714,796 tailISSI 84.29 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 16 1 If" a Figure 5-8. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Petronila (1842 — 2016) i111111��W 11101rI Nllid 11' [01,0 0,00111,0101, Irl �IIII�gI11111111111P11111'1P��!N�� 1 111111111 1111111111111111111111 IiliII1 IIII 1jI1111111111111111 1'.1" 1I11II IIIII III IIIIIIIIIIII1111111111jii1111 1111' od 111111111 111111111110 III00lullllllllluul 100! 111110111 VVI WW 11111111111111111111111, 1 to 110 lo 111111111111111 W1111IIIIII110IIIIIIL II III ulul 1 Utt 11111111111111 111111111111111 II p 111111111111111111111111111 1111 0h111111 j, oo0100000000000000 1110011111111111111111111 1 ' 00011111111111 11111111111111111,111 0111 00000000000000000000000. 0110•10•10•1•00:00"0"00.• i 0000 01 00,00,00,000000 j'11111111111110111111111.11 I 11: I��'11ol, 11,1 011010111,1110110011110" 11SN051(PI m°II11111111111 �WW111 1 dl , OuniiYliiARpYkp1(i'! 41,601111l1101117d. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 111110000000000000111 110+ ,,:00,,10 11.1111 111111111100 lL:Cillk 11111111111111111111111111 1 ii 11 • 111111 1)III11N110111)111 NIP10V:.!U'• 11WWW1,11 1 00 111111 10 100 0,00,001111011111111,11,11000001,1110 0100100400 dr: 000 ul111111111 111111 1!11111111 1 III 111111111111111111 11111111111111111VI1111 11111V 01�1111111111111111111111�11111 (i00 1ml 110 W11u1� 1010,r000000„0I1llhlo Iu 10111 0000ll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101 h0uWll11ll IIIIII 11111 01I0I11I 0 muuul �l111111110000o1111iloou000mool000l000l0000uuu0011011111111111111111111111111111111111111 puu 111111111111 1 11111111 101 1111 1 011111001:0100,00010111111011111 llllllll1 IWWIWWVWIWWINooIWWIWWIWWWIVIooWIWWIVI� 0o j j,401 �010000 IIIII 1WW11111d 101100000 1111111111 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11„111111111111111111p111111111111111111111111111111111 11jInuH I�11 u1111111111uu1111 I 1 aU: IIII V1111,1111)))))))))),o1))))))))))))),o1,11omV V 111 ill ,a'„'l1 4 )01, o 11,„,111” :far” 14 h 111111111,1\1,1111:1;1 ;dna„ r 14 111111111111111111111111 10,0111101 0111011010101011011111 0110111111111111111111 III,11111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 100 0rwilii� l,l{ VI o1111111111111110111111„01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 17 1 IIP ,n 100000 City of Port Aransas Hurricane and Tropical Storms Hazard SSSSSS\t ISSISSIII \\MIX\ slaw m nassi ssz tat :Err nal City Wide Seaward and Inland 1 ISTECIASI Total Storms 3 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 2 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 1 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms Tropical Storms & Depressions 1.7% 1.2% SSSSSSIIV 3,955 lastrnanasssalummulas 6621 ISS1121211111111SIMI: r r MSS% 9.58 Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 9004.91 Category 3 Hurricanes 0.6% 1 1 0 `���"��\�11�\11\l1\\1 \111\11\O\\11\\1�` $774, , 306434 liarr 1 $413,772,710 lsastnlsnu saw tartassiu 0.00 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 18 1 If" a Figure 5-9. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Port Aransas (1842 — 2016) 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111000 11111 aataaa Humana a, , t Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 19 1 P a City of Robstown Hurricane and Tropical Storm Hazard SISISSI11111SSISSI\‘‘‘‘M\\\\\\\ slaw m nassi ssz mitt r au City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 ISTECIASI Total Storms 1 ISSISSI 1 Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 0 Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 0 0 lssss\s=nssst Future Storms Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% 0.6% SSSSSSIIV 76 sstttrnansa sattermals 2118 ISS1121211111111SIMI: r r MSS% 42.80 Category 1 Hurricanes Category 2 Hurricanes 9921.51 Category 3 Hurricanes 1 1 0 `���"��\�11�\11\l1\\1 \111\11\O\\11\\1�` $183,445,540 1 1 $151,390,423 MU 1 ISMS 12.46 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 20 1 If" a Figure 5-10. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for City of Robstown (1842 — 2016) 11110 11111111 pHHHHi 41, IIIH1111111111111 II VW��� iiu1I9V 1111Yuuuw IVvr IpitIIMII uiYl���(i(h'lll iM °N rAlt' Nll Hi rI . iury I/t Ifl 11111111111111111 i Ildllllll1111111i HHHHHj9Y1! „ijuul all9. �� IIIIII 'i 1Ygillvi0000000lu Valla pu,a 1 'III ,uur'rvl,; 1 iu4b...HAII a'AHiiu3dl;:;w1411 wit4PYin o HlHlllr'HIHH40HHH, 'UHH40'A„,;,s; Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 21 1 P ,n d', m' Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hazard S SS\S11 Insts "iii Ism ma ..al Jurisdiction Wide Inland 1 1St 111=111 Total Storms 6 ISSSS%% 1 ISSISSM Tropical Storms & Category 1 Depressions Hurricanes 1 2 S\SSSSSS\M\\1=MSSS Future Storms 3.5% Tropical Storms & Depressions 0.6% Category 1 Hurricanes 1.2 % Category 2 Hurricanes 0.6% Category 2 Category 3 Hurricanes Hurricanes 1 2 Category 3 Hurricanes 1.2% ISSISSSW 12E:111 n\SSS\ InatninSa Unknown 1.1 Sat% ISSMECIASS\ 245 111111521111111Mat • r nal% 0.8 7,867 0 IIMASAIMpill”111,1SI t '""" ISSITEIESSISI 27.4 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 22 1 If" a Figure 5-11. Map of Hurricane & Tropical Storms for Port of Corpus Christi Authority (1842 — 2016) aylyuli c 111111111111111111111111 til dSr 1 �Yr;cii ,rMl 101 Ik 111111,111111111111111,1111111111111,11,111,11,111111111 11111111111111111,111,1,1,11,1,1,11111 .....1111..: 0. 00 011000 40000 1;01 rhoo :aohr,m :u' ;,t.: r Jel• Ptiwo V W k`I Conlky 111111 1111111111st... 1111, 11111111111111,111 04.4411i410 • 01000000. IMI010000 '0,00000,00,111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 5 23 1 P ,n d', m' W ��f VMS 1111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11111111Klim Flood Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Flood Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Flood Hazard 8 City of Bishop Flood Hazard 10 City of Corpus Christi Flood Hazard 12 City of Driscoll Flood Hazard 15 City of Petronila Flood Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Flood Hazard 19 City of Robstown Flood Hazard 21 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Flood Hazard 24 Flood Hazard Overview Description A flood is the accumulation of water within a body of water, which results in the overflow of excess water onto adjacent lands, usually floodplains. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake or other watercourse susceptible to flooding. Flooding is the partial or complete inundation of otherwise normally dry land. Types of flooding include riverine, coastal, and shallow flooding. Location Sources of flooding in the Nueces County area include coastal flooding, riverine flooding, and flooding resulting from poor drainage, otherwise referred to as localized flooding. FEMA flood maps are the number one resource for defining location of flood hazard for a community. Current effective FEMA flood maps for Nueces County are dated 1981 to 1985. An update to the FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Nueces County Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the Gulf Coast began in 2006. Preliminary FIRMS for Nueces County were released on 5/26/2016. The updated FIRMS and FIS are in the process of becoming effective and are currently in the comment phase. The Flood Map project is part of a nation-wide effort to update coastal flood risk data. In Texas, this project includes 17 of 18 coastal counties. New FIS data and modeling will enable coastal counties and communities to make informed decisions regarding land use development, risk identification, and mitigation and recovery as it pertains to reducing hazard risk from flood. Adoption of updated flood maps in conjunction with development of a new county -wide Hazard Mitigation Plan provides Nueces County and its communities an opportunity to Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 1 1 If" ,n g coordinate and implement these two planning mechanisms into land use policies, regulations, and ordinances, and to alter the built environment to build resiliency to natural hazards over time. Higher regulatory standards may also be considered by communities to be more aligned with the county's regulations, and to more effectively, and responsibly, manage the local National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). This report section includes floodplain maps for each participating jurisdiction with the effective 1981/1985 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) floodplain extents and the proposed floodplain extents which incorporate the latest hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the area. Extent Magnitude of flood hazards is expressed in term of maximum flood depth experienced by the jurisdiction. Generally, homes that are impacted by more than four feet of flood depth are considered by FEMA as a complete loss. Therefore, flood depth combined with number of homes impacted by floods is one measure of a community's vulnerability to flood damage. FEMA flood maps designated Special Flood Hazard Areas that indicate areas of the County that have a 1`)/0 annual chance of inundation. A 0.2% annual chance of inundation floodplain has also been designated by FEMA, further detailing the extent of flood hazards in Nueces County. Occurrences Flood occurrences in Nueces County are documented in the NCDC Storm Event Database. The NCDC data reports include event details such as property damage, crop damage, injury and death. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 2 1 If" ,n g l 11111 10/30/1984 10/1/1995 9/20/1996 10/5/1996 4/2/1997 4/2/1997 4/2/1997 4/2/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 4/3/1997 5/23/1997 6/6/1997 6/21/1997 10/9/1997 10/13/1997 10/18/1998 10/18/1998 Table 6-1. NCDC flood records 1984 - 2016 NM� \\ 1a o\ � \\ 1a o\ \ \ Q01111111111 .0101\\\\1�1 u01111111111 .0101\\\\1�1 111 0\1111\ 111 0\1111\ 1 l( 1 m 1 � m 1 IIS wi Min u `111111311 IIS wi , , mu , u ���`�aii��1�11i��a��liu�l��ii������,�\1���\\o����o�`�`h�a�,��\`�`�`�� X11111111111`���`�aii��1�11ii�a��liu�l��ii������,�\1���\\o����o�`�`h�a�,��\`�`�`�� 8/23/1999 6/10/2003 9/18/2006 3/14/2000 7/18/2003 7/2/2007 3/14/2000 9/12/2003 7/2/2007 3/14/2000 9/17/2003 7/3/2007 11/4/2000 9/18/2003 7/3/2007 8/31/2001 9/19/2003 7/4/2007 8/31/2001 9/23/2003 7/4/2007 9/2/2001 10/24/2003 7/7/2007 9/2/2001 4/6/2004 7/25/2007 9/9/2001 4/25/2004 11/16/2001 5/13/2004 11/16/2001 6/22/2004 7/31/2002 6/25/2004 8/14/2002 9/2/2004 8/14/2002 7/28/2005 9/16/2002 10/11/2005 9/17/2002 5/31/2006 9/19/2002 6/1/2006 10/28/2002 6/1/2006 10/28/2002 7/5/2006 10/28/2002 7/5/2006 12/9/2002 7/26/2006 9/17/2010 9/19/2010 9/19/2010 9/19/2010 9/20/2010 9/20/2010 4/29/2013 4/29/2013 9/15/2013 9/29/2013 5/13/2014 9/27/2014 10/11/2014 011111°;ii?m"1u��°';°;;,'��°1°���1��� 3/21/2015 3/21/2015 3/21/2015 4/22/2015 4/22/2015 4/22/2015 5/12/2015 5/12/2015 5/12/2015 5/15/2015 5/21/2015 5/24/2015 6/17/2015 9/11/2015 10/21/2015 3/1/2016 3/9/2016 5/16/2016 8/30/2016 Additionally, five non -hurricane, flood -related FEMA disaster declarations took place in Nueces County between 1971 and 2017. Disaster declarations are made at the county level without published detail of impacts to each jurisdiction. Consequently, these disasters are not described within the jurisdictional tables. Disaster Declarations are shown in Table 6-2. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 3 1 If" ,n g Table 6-2. Nueces County Flood -Related Disaster Declarations 313 9/18/1971 603 9/25/1979 727 10/30/1984 1257 10/21/1998 1425 7/4/2002 1439 11/5/2002 11111411 ttat\ 9/18/1971 9/25/1979 10/30/1984 10/17/1998 6/29/2002 10/24/2002 111.4 AA 9/18/1971 9/25/1979 10/30/1984 11/15/1998 7/31/2002 11/15/2002 W\T"W. V\A\ Information Not Provided Information Not Provided Information Not Provided $33,279,674 $27,960,004 $57,974,742 Table 6-2. Nueces County Flood -Related Disaster Declarations Cont. 1 1709 6/29/2007 4223 5/29/2015 '"1\\ 6/16/2007 5/04/2015 8/3/2007 6/23/2015 ttla $25,706,394 $57,635,747 Probability Probability and frequency of return were calculated by dividing the number of flood events in the recorded time period for flood hazard by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events. Estimated probability of future flood events has been calculated for each participating jurisdiction. The probabilities shown in the jurisdictional tables are based on previous occurrences documented by the NCDC database. Impact Impacts of flooding frequently include damage to people, property, buildings, and infrastructure. Flooding may cause bridge and road closures, service disruptions, and injuries and fatalities. Flood impacts are summarized in the jurisdictional tables. Disaster Declarations at the county level are detailed in Table 6-2. Vulnerability Asset vulnerability to flood for each jurisdiction can be found in the jurisdictional tables below. Major infrastructure is defined at critical utility lines (gas, water, etc.), highway, and rail access. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 4 1 If" ,n g NFIP Participation One of the most powerful tools businesses and homeowners have to protect themselves from flooding is flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Nueces County and the participating jurisdictions, with the exception of Petronila, participate in the NFIP. Nueces County and participating jurisdictions have a total of 243 repetitive loss properties, having received a total of $13,386,740.21 in flood insurance payments. Repetitive Loss properties are properties that have received two or more payments of $1,000 within a ten year period. Of those 243 repetitive loss properties, 28 are severe repetitive loss properties. Severe repetitive loss properties are properties that have received four NFIP payments of over $5,000 each. Ajurisdictional breakdown of repetitive and severe repetitive loss properties can be found in the summary table for each jurisdiction. With the exception of Petronila, which does not participate in the NFIP, all participating jurisdictions have developed mitigation actions related to NFIP compliance and maintenance. These mitigation actions can be seen in Section 19. All participating communities identified flooding as a hazard of particular relevance. Consequently, numerous mitigation actions were developed that will help mitigate the impacts of floods. Many of these actions relate to continued compliance with the NFIP and public outreach projects that exceed the NFIP minimum standards. As a whole, the participating jurisdictions recognize the flood mitigation benefits of exceeding the NFIP minimum standards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 5 1 If" ,n g Unincorporated Nueces County Flood Hazard a X11\111\1\0�1�1�1�1����1�����\���\��\\�»�,�,`�,m�„»�ii�»�,�,��,���,;�li��,ii�11111��1�1�1�����\��������������\���� » `\ �� � 1, �; 11 �; �\ �\ 100 1� 0\000 �� �� �� 1101 .111 110 12211•11111 all\ 01I�01�� o��\�� ���� �\\������ ���� ���i� ��`� \\\\\opo\������ `��\ ���»� ��������0������ ���,1� 11�\���,,,,,,,;���,„1��1��������������� �������0�����0�� �����\��1�„�;,1� ��,\����„�„��,������„;;;,�,,,�11` 11��,�1��101���1`�0�0���� ���\��\I,����1�,��\I�„������„111��,���1�1�1 Riverine Nueces River Localized Nueces Bay Coastal Corpus Christi Bay 6.19 tttt%%%%%EMER%SS% InWHIESSI ISEIBEAMM1 22 2 deaths (10/9/1997 Flash Flood) islssa.mmm.axts\\ suatimagniall inssuruntlay 33% annual chance 3 catass mon 11•111.11111% Enntrim tan 16,873 $76,164,618,941 9.24 3.31 stansuntanass���,,,,,�11�I1,,���,,,,11111511.,1,,1,I„�MIS„� � �� ��alllll���ll`�11��1� �i1� 39 $1,800,870.55 2 $407,058.37 111 111 1 11 1 lu I��� �� 111 1 0111\ 111 1111 111110110111111111111 11111 111 111111 I IIIIIII 111 11111 1 1111 1111 111 10 11 111 11 111 0\ 1 11 \ 11 \ 1 1 1 1 J \ .0111\0\00.111.110111 .1111111111 V`01111110@1�0�11��1�1 11111111111111111111111111111111110 1�1\0�0��1\ Illlllllll I� 11111111111 ��IIIIV. U 11111111.11.111111 .111 X1111 V\0\111111\101\111111\I1 „�1�111 1111 011D n 1 11 1.1111 1IQ1�111 n, \ 1 \ �IQ111111 11 �„�1�110111111V010) On, � 111 11�111�i10��tii11�11i��lo��i1`1�1���1,1``1\1��11�11�1�11�10�111���1a11,1i����lao�l�l�a�111��11�1��1�11�1��11���111ao,�1�1��111�1a��'lillll\1\\1\11��111111��1�\a��1��111,�»N�1io�lil�li�11t111i�1�»1i1��1i�11�ii11�li1�illi'i1��� �1\111”�`�`1�1����11101'�11�"�`11�i11�1�111111�11110,�11��\1111�111i1`�i11111�1i1�1`I��lii1�1111��1111111111�111�1�`�111�111�1101�1111�11110�11111`1111,11�1111��111�11�11\i1�1�1i11�111�111��11�111111`��111�1����`��1��1�” Assmd. Condo 1 1��� 11 111111 11�1� 1� onn Dam Other Residential Other Nonresidential ingle Family Residential Belvy Lake Dam Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam 1 1 36 Belvy Lake Dam Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam Chapman Ranch Lake Dam Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 6 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-1. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for Unincorporated Nueces County 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11 1000 itill,ll IV.i°" w�,lm il,Vilmuuuuu uutlllllllllluuuuumil ?luuuuumlrrorr 1 e1141167rn III Ir+ sins, Irorilr. 1 11111111 fit S... i1. 00 srrrrryirrr QUI 1111111111 III r7u hpllppu°(ililyllll°IIIllllir;gywtloluu Srrs,rrisrsrrirrisrsolisrriii,s lldwti� �. loca:id„ iirlullrrrwm wmaul ,. lite. Naescran d..: N linty zatl'ta Jlur'rxustiuu.arloraat Hazard Mirtrorgrotion ArctIrron Plan Cr, oresrr'rl,V!ariii PreVn'Uiw'i ury FEMA F1r' Jrphir4103, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 7 1 P a I, e City of Agua Dulce Flood Hazard sinatztatalvammemarma Localized Riverine Video Documentation of 2015 Flood Event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyx7IXaO1Lw Nearby creek 1.5* SSIBFEESSIIISSEBIFISSI 4 (all flash floods) 0 death, 0 injury asssssmznssss ssuzzonmansi assaimmalsa 6% annual chance 16.5 years cum crunla mutzut 110,7, gay 547 $114,757,767 9.24 3.31 0\110\lll 11111111111111111111111111111111`115100�00�11� 1 1 \ 0 1 1 11•11 CIAMTV7IFFIE�,»���;,»�»��,», »�,�,,,��a,;�,�,����n»�,,�„»� �,����1�1���� WEER o So o So 111 Agua Dulce Elementary School Agua Dulce Elementary School School Agua Dulce High School Agua Dulce High School Designated Shelter/ Emergency David Berlanga Community Center David Berlanga Community Center Evacuation Center Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 8 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-2. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Agua Dulce u u u u u u u l u u l u u u u u l u u u l u u l u u u u u u u u u l u u u u u l u l u u l u u l u u u u u u u u u u u u l l u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u l u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u l u u u u u u u u 1 11u,IrI IoIlIl1111111 IIoIrI11I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I 1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I11IrI11I111111 11111.11.11.1.1.11..1'1:111'1.'111''11.1'1.11'1:11111 IIlIlIlIlIlIlI InIr11I1I1I1I111111rI11I1I1IrI11I1I1Ir1111111111 1111111111 I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1Ir1111111111 11 I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1InIIr111111111111 I11I1I1I 1o11l11111111rI11I1I1IrI11I1I IoIlIlI1111111111111 IoI1I 1o11l11l11l11l11l1lIoIrI1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir111111111111111111rI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1Ir1111111111 11111111110111111 IlIlIlIlIlIlIlInIIrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir 1111111111111111111I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11011111111111111111111111111111111r11111111111111111111111 11111111111 1111111111 111111 11 11111111 I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1111 1111 I11I1 I1InIIrI11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1IrI11I1I1I1I1I1IrIfI fIoIrI11I1I1I1I1 IoI1I1I111111111111111111111 1111111111 111111 11r I11I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1 I0I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1Ir I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I11111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111011l r111111r11111 1110111111111111 i1 u u u 1111101 11111111111111101liii l '�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11 IIII iiiiuull ull I luuuuuuuluuuoiuuu iuulluuu iuu uuuualuuuuul iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluuuuuouuuuuluuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuluuuuuuuoiuuuluuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuluuuuuuouuliuuuuliuuuuuuuuuuuuuulluuuuuuuul iuuuuuuuuuuuuul uuul iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuul uuuuuluuluuuuu 11 111 ul 11111!11 , I ��;;. ������ ������������������������������ ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 1111111.11.11.11....11...11 ,1 111 11111 1,1111 1,111111111 : 11 111111 11,11 . IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIII IIII 11111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIJII II II I 11111111111,0111III IIII IJII 11111 IIIIIII IJI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIuIII IIIIIJIIIuIIIIuIIIIIII 11u11111111111111 I III IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 11111,1101 1111,111101111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIII 111 II II 111111,1111111,1,1,1,1,1,1 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII I IIIIIIIIIII)1 II II I I 11 1 . III duuuuuuuumuuuumuuuuuumuummuumumuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummuuuumuuuuuuuumuuumil uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuuumuuummuuuuuuuumluuuuumuuuuuuuuuumuumuuuumuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumu1u1m1u 011 Illhmu_. altttl YI,�h11h111R�10 _, ;,,,11 u 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 uulllll 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111hI111111111111111111111111111111111111111hIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl111111111u111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111hIIIIIIIIIIhIIIIhIIhhIIIhIIIIhIIh11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIII1111111111111IIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIu 1 IIII 11111dd111111 jlllpplfJ��,111111111ulllllll,III„IIIIII����1 IIT ,,, �,� �����,� ������ ���, ���� ���� 0 1111111111 uuu111'llllul1Ullll110 111111111 1111111111 1,1 rr 111111 �1J11 11111111VP dollood ooloolooloolloolooloolloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloollo j100000000000000,00000, 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110 II qi IIIIIIIIII pV toolofill II ,111111111111111111111m 111111111 01 /40,PEI UV* Cocci y L k r rrr ua reigt IMub-duniscitettikonaA Kazanc &NiVeillatil.,hwwes. 01itYpatinnAr;lBwnn w:74n u re Currenrand Prel4 nira rya FEWA 000 ern Nueces County Multi—Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 9 1 P ,n d', City of Bishop Flood Hazard ISSISSWEIRSIMSSM ISSIMERSIS 1111111111S1I stationnal imam. Intran Localized Nearby creeks � u u v � . v�� �ti vi��oi�� w va i iu v� osu� ��` v��`ti . uu� iti�� `titi 1 1� N ti»�1 1 1 n 1 �� Y 0 Om � 1 � 1 � � �1 1111 11 �1 1111 1 � � ��� �I ����� �� u�i� ����� u, l ���������������11����»��»�,»a»,�»�»,»���„»»�,»�»,���,»��,»,»�»�»�.�»��.a»�,»�»���10�����1�� 5 0 death, 0 injury IMSSSSMMMSS\SS ISEIMEraritnal IMSSIMEMS\Sal 7.6% annual chance 13.2 years assssszrasss um= vtanalma mernanv wartrum 1,756 $1,556,391,434 0 .06 isssssurttar x\\\‘‘‘‘‘‘m\\\\\\\\1 IHREE0111 %HER 111llo � ���a,;�,�,����N»�,,�»»� �,����1�1���� ���,�\�11 2 $28,195.18 0 $0 \ 1�v10 a 11n1n 1111 , » »MI "`��M » » 1„� Single Family Residental wiritzta lacratrainasi �\ 1 1v � nn No assets in SFHA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 6 10 1 Figure 6-3. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Bishop 111111111111111111111111111111111110 III11111� 'ii� W Ilul lllllu 1111111111 11111111111111101„ 0111,111100111•1110111111111111111111'1 H100,00:00111111111,00,0111 @vyu,00:00111 1 1000i1 iiiuuli'lu�iuoluuauz 1111111 I 00,0001 1 Hi 1,111111111111111111 11.1,1,1,1, 111111111111111111111 01,111111111,10011 1,111 ulllllul hull W 1",, ili 11111111111111111 „ I" 111 HI a dui.V lutl^�d Ili 111°1111111l11jj iiiiiiiillipllVlllllll l 1 X11 I II II 11,,I,,,,,,,,,„°,„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„,„„„,„„„�„uiiiil�10�lnllll�l, "1"1111111111111111111111.j..,1,1111111.011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000 I N 1111 Dol0000001Rhllllllll� Od1 1111111111111111111 ,1,11,1„,1 110 11J1110J1ll] 111, 01010,1011,10,40 ij�lllliuu lll 11111:11:11111 ::1 '' �, � 11111191h dlld I�i� i l 1111 11 11111111111111111,11,1111 1•11 P�'�Ilul I I���I llliuull i"'1'1651,1.1! "I^ ' Iltlllll '1 „11,1„111 IIII,I���I1��4I�I'I1 11I�000 I11111IIa1j11101,10000111111100101111111111111 101111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111 1111, III, 111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 10 ..1 I1II10111W' .111'1'N1111111111111111111111 5� 111111111111111111111111'1'1! 101 q B',o, l Vllll OutllI I''Ald 11nllu�Ill0InIn Iln01 1,000000R000000011111 11111 11ll011111'00u li IIIIIIIIIIIII1I11 0 I II III I 1010' 11 it pl,i,, 1 pli IIIIIyy'", [I li �1 VI III,"III�II�IIIIIIIIIII�I�IIIIV I'I 11,� 1I 1 I' 'i111111001 mmummmmul1m11 pp ,uuuuuu dIIII 10 III �V1 I Ir,�II�I'I���������������, flil y Iliir r �iiij i,'iiiiiij �iillpi I nuwwmuwi 'w'w'uw�nyum,uuull� u��M11NNNIm+lpol 101111110000000001 Lot Ywwnt/4, 4lao0 m^m Ifiewmann. futon. 10110001 MwI -J uwear111d Cin'..,ge ki rd,Laoa"r .-m3r!'Dm r%kT,i "f ltb}Y71'}rt,;}*'q 'FENA, iK'MCMSwatrrss �VNIpINwwvi01.1„111,111,111,111,111,11111111111111111u"G Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 11 1 IP ,u 000000 0000 City of Corpus Christi Flood Hazard SSSSSWMMIISISIIIW SSVIIIISSS slarmansti scrantatal unintalmal Riverine Corpus Christi Bay Localized Nueces Bay Coastal Oso Bay 10.62 ISSSSSIMEIaSSS ISSIEFERSII ISIESEREISI 49 Four injuries MUM1.»s»»>;;» ss SnallIMMISSSI 74% annual chance 16 months slasstass um= =non ow= mu= 115,871 $2,864,811,240,170 39.8 7.02 1 \ 111II II\\,1V ,1.11.,,,11lal1,,,11� VIETall„",,,IaVllla1,11.1,111,,,11 IMMO11,a,l„I,,,la,1.11.,,,11Iy\VI11,1„�„V>aal\\I,�1\�1111,1„�„,,\��,a�,\\„Iy\VI.�� �� �.. lig» ,,. �... �.. � .. �� �� ..o�» ,,. ,. �.. ,.. � .. �� �� ..111111A�1 � ���11� �� 9 ,. �. ., i,,,(111 �1\\ .1111111 ��11 0111�� 01\1\\\�\� �( ..1111�\�1� ���i1111 �1 1 1`111111 0 �1�111��1011,, 111�� �1�1 I 1\ � �0� 111 ���»��„�1a,;,�;�„�,. ���n»��,�»�,�.�1�� ����������������������\ ;,»�»��,», »»,�»,�,a,;�,�»���,��I�n»�,»»»� �,����1�1���� » �»�a„��e:,�,�,�,����,�\�11 171 $10,258,764.80 25 $4,573,225.47 1 1 1 1 , 1 uolauoaal.l�.l011 001�110 IV1�»ollliuoal�lllai 1 1���1��oa111a��1o�lliuo 1�11uooa»Ill I�lil�lly 101011 �ilu. ulnallol.11.oaa a�llllo va111�»I�Iultiaa111Va1i�loi �, ��V X11111 1 y 1V\ X0111\111 V n, 11111 ..111111 111p1191191V11 �\111. n, 11\..1111. 1191U1� PV\\111111VVI �„ uwU �11V11 1.1.194\ \ �VV1011 V n, 111111 11U1111 X111��,�h„�,»������»„»`�„�„Ilh»�»Ih»,�,»���,»,m»,»��'»,�,»��»„»��»�»Ohm»�,,,»�,��„»lhN�,»,,,�Il�i„IIS»��,�In1�,l�»��a�1��m„»»�,,,»�»�,,,�u��»�,.��„”,�,n�����„»,21.»,���,»,�1»�»„»�,�,wL x\11\��110\�\����1��1���\„Ila,»��,�,»�»�»,�6��»,»�»,»�»������„I„III„�,»�„�.����„»»`�„�,��»�»II���,»„�1�,�»�»,�»,»?�,»��1»,»,k�»,�„�1,»,»I,,,»1,�,�,»,��,��,�,�,»,�1����1010�0�0��������� 2-4 Family Residential 4 Assmd. Condo 13 Business Nonresidential 2 Other Residential 8 Other Nonresidential 34 Single Family Residential 135 1 0 � V \ 1 >u 1 .1110 >W \ .1110 9 9 l , n„ n„ � 0 n, „ c n„ � n„ 1� C 4. �`�”�`�`���»��a�»»�,»,�»�»�»,�,»��,�H�,»,��I����,Iia,»��»,�»�,»i�9��,�i9fi,�»�,��,�»�,���,X10»�I��»,�»�,�i�»,�»�»���»u��,,;»�11,,����,�,����1� �`�”�`�`���`�`��`�`�������������»��a��,,,�»�,�»�„»�„�,»��,�J�,»,�,��,��,li�l,��,»���9�»ail,�»�»»��»N���1»,�»»�»�„»�»�,»�»,�,»�»�„»�„�i�1,»i��f»�»,,�������`�`�������������`������������ Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Dam Fire Station Fire Station 15 Fire Station 16 Calallen Reservoir Dam Fire Station 10 Fire Station 15 Fire Station 16 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 12 1 If” ,n g School Wastewater Treatment Plant Barnes Elementary Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant Barnes Elementary Seashore Middle School Academy Jones Elementary Seashore Learning Center Los Encinos SES West Oso Junior High Wynn Seale Metropolitan School of Design West Oso Elementary Dr. ML Garza -Gonzalez Charter School Garcia Elementary Dr. ML Garza -Gonzalez Accelerated Learning Center Mary Grett School Cunningham Middle School Laguna Wastewater Treatment Plant Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 13 1 If" a g Figure 6-4. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Corpus Christi „4gdp o; ulllilll,11111i "' '''1'1'1'1111111111111,11111 1111111111111111 4pp IiVVV Ilit !VIII li1ii l 111111111111( .m�d�rrnwur. lIrrc., dl,Gihltt iu1/1-,JutlINirdi'r,i!'tr u1'rtp���'tuu n AetluOrli Plan Covet -1'111 arise Pif11:11irntirtity Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 14 1 P ,n City of Driscoll Flood Hazard ISSUIRSIS scriumnal vatatemtmal Riverine Creek north of the city limits Localized Localized flooding 2* ISSSSS.IMa.SSSS Kintat ISSN BER 0 0 death, 0 injury ISEMMEIZEM:»»»al ISSSVRE21RSSSI 1% annual chance* 100 years* * Typically sheet flooding. Based upon local expert opinion. The existing FIS does not include studied floodplain areas. The upcoming FIS will include studied floodplain areas and will provide extent (depth) information. slassasss um= ow= u= 610 $394,563,590 0 0.5 ISSSSSTIMZZnSSSSI\ \ » 713ESIAINIER 1�1"`���1�\��� 1 �� � � ���1�1 �`�I���i o�11�1"�»�,�,��,,�1,»�,�,»�»��„�la,;,�;�„��,. ����n»����»�,�.�1�� ����`1�1����11��������������1���������� ������������\ ��,����n»�,,�»»� �,����1�1���� �������»��»�,�»�,�,� �»�a„��e:,�,�,�,����,�\�11 0 1141\ n School $o Driscoll Elementary & Middle School 0 $o MASS Driscoll Elementary & Middle School Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 6 15 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-5. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Driscoll 111 001 II. 101 111111111 1 1,.11111111Y111111111III IIII 1 1 911911 IIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 1111111 II IIII II I IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIII III Him (IIIIIIIIIII II VIII h II V'IhhV'h'llllllllllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilimil1111' Illllllllhlllllllllllllll'llllh'Ih' 1'114111) II1111111 110 nnnnnnIII nnnnnn rl 1 nnnnnm nrn nnn r Im1iliiiu111,V.111V11111�����I 11,111�111 1 IIIIII VIII IIIIII, VIII I Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIII 1.111,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II u l lililUUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IiIIIIIPIiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIII. „. (IIII II IIID' Y' Ioi0Ilv 11111111 i1111111 0111011 III Hill 'Idi 11111111111111 III11 I1111 111111 °1111'1111111111111111111111111 �I4YIIIIIIIIII@II'llllll l li 111111111 IIIIII Ilvll�luuu9111Puuuulll 111111 IIII II iilpuuul IIIIII q H111..1.1.1.1.1! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.UIIIIIII ����� ��������� III. 111111 �Ih a uulViii'uuuouuouuum 1II Iiii1'' 1111 ;111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11119111111111111V111111111j1jlj' 111111111111111111111111„111110 • N1111111I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111- 11111111111111111IIIJIIIIIIII ���1111';1'. � 1111 If t i " 1 l 1� i rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r rrrrrrr rrrr 1� I 111 1 I�Iu 1 1111111 1111IIIIp� NpppIul11uu11uu11uu11u11umuuuu11u11u11u11u111uu11u11u11uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummII uuI1um1umu1Iulimi 11u11u11111I; , I 1 IIl 9 V 1 1 Nynuuuuuuuuuuuuuppuuuuunumluuwlpl 1111III�1„„„„11111111111111111,111111,,l,„„,,1 m11d 1 1111 III611iill111liiilI111111111111161111111111IJJIII11911111(1111 + r 11 MI111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111�1 l 111011 11110 m11uum "1111 uuiiii11111 luuuuul uo IIII11 yll� 111,1111111 I I III' 1111111II 'IIIIII11 I I II IIII II IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I „. 11111111 111111111 1I1111111iliii 1 11111 11111111111aiiiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiiiiiiijlllliiiii1?I901 l i111111 111° 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111_111 11„, , , 1 11 1 uI 01 1111111111010 1111lllllhhllllll 1000 II j1 1II 1I1111I 11 I"11111h111111pu 111111111111111111111111111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1111 I II a 11i uiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuiiuii ll I 1�! 111111 111 111a1 111111' IlI 111 1 11111 1 I I11111111 1�In u II III iwI1 „�i+,Ileurydf Nnu0 ��po�relrl w111�111�1 I �11NIII;;;.I lfl1,l,lwlll�lul .A„ (II«IL1:II. fI'r(1rI1',11I((((i(i(i(u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((1((1(((I(l(u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u((u(((((((�(y(I li' ^11I�I1 II hIIII II ;. I11111l11 111111 II, n lIIl, ���� 1111111 1 111 1 1�lll1; d 1 I00 II111l lll1lII11 k n I i 1Ul";u oiry1 111 III 111 11 lIIllllllllllllllllllllllI 1 1 01lii1 11111i11Illl11l IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII116 111111 ' � � I p lm r "� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I »���J'l i l � l III I'( �I "IiI 11111111111111111111111111 11111111111 I 1 Hp �w, r NNIINNNNNNNNN!l1���(Y111111h 1r h1111111111 %116^N'a"� "lY/4u1N "" v,il(jffffffftliii I'I 11111 j111?1111111111 1 1 1 1 (IIIIIIIIIIII uuuli 1 j j 1 uilllluuuuuuuuuml III 111 110"'" Ilr111111111111111 111111111 1 001 000000000001111 11111111111 X111 10111 111111111111111111111 III 11111111 111111111111111 111111111 I,I, III"1111 II IIIIIIIII;;;!�;;;;;11111i1iijiiillif iliiilillP11111P1111PP111 1I ?I�II111i11111'1I1�11111J11, 1111 IIIIII I IIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIII�PIII 111 ip➢ul�llllll� ,Li'11111,8 Lockwood, Andidows &. 000000krvhruc. 11 AXIOM 17 n fti u.uYti ,J1pori•E4CIt'iOnaI Has Nlutigafioo A.cti'on Plan Current ,end Pristk o unary tl MAIFNknx,,pU3dav1'a ' IMI' IuMM111MH1NH1NH1NHIW Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 16 1 P ,n d1, e City of Petronila Flood Hazard ISSISSWEESSISISM ISSUMISSS ,, ,,1 1„��l ,�„ ,11, 1"11 ,,1 1�, imaretuntan����\,111 ,��I\11����1�1��11��`��� ��11����1�11��1���11��������� �1�1���»���,����10�1��10�1���,���,��,���,��,`����,;,;,,;���„„1�„�,�������1�0����� �1����10�1���,��1,�,,,�,,,,,���1������1���1�,�,;;;,,��„��„`,�,���„���1��1��1�� ��,,���,,,,,ll�,�,��,���1,���,;101111 Localized Localized drainage 4 SSS: Mtn\SSS 3 (all flash floods) 0 death, 0 injury MS%%%% ISNEMErrnit SSSSIMMMSSS\1 4.5% annual chance 22 years slassass um= =non ow= mu= 159 $14,345,526 0 0 0 nn,„ � nn cl „1 E , V ,, ,� �, IIS �u� �� »����,�;;�,�»�»�»,�»��,�u�`�,»,�„�»�,�,,»,mow„»,�»�,»��,»,�� I\\\\\‘‘‘‘M\\\\\\\\1 110\lll 11IMMISSS ��0 1 1 1 \'\11�1i�����i`illo � � ���111 �`�I���i o�l��� 111��,�,»���;,»�»��,», »�,�»,�,a,;�,�,����n»�,,�»»� �,����1�1���� �������»��»�,�»�»,� �»�a„��e:,�,�,�,����,�\�11 $o INESETEEMEEEKIMII 0 $o SSISE 11 °,�, , ;,� ,„»,�;;,EM,1?`�;,;`1111\111111�0111111111\11����� I No assets in SFHA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 17 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-6. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Petronila 1111111111111) ) �111111111111 1 �uuilll°llllllllllllllijii1•1III ' 1,1 ,w 1111 I 01 1 111 0011111111111 01 11111111 ow 110 111100IwIIIIIIIII 10 � I 11 1111 11 1111 1 1111' • ill ol to 1 IIgi .1111 .1.11111 1.1.11111111111.1.1.111 11111111 It I III 1111111 II lo 11111111 o rl IiIpl 1•u 1•u j °How o 1 11111111111111111 oIIIIIIIIII" II 11111111111111 11 0 II IIIII� loo 1'1'1111. 1111.111.11" IIIIII:00111010111111111111111111111111,01,o„ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111, tottoto „„„.t " '111111111111111111111 1111111,1,1,1111, tl.1u1 01'01111 lllul'll'l'llll'llllll'I'll'l1OO1 IIII Ila "jI' IIIlu11111IdIlIPP1111161 ��1 ). — ttlttlt1;11'1'11:' l'011OOI.1.."11.1111 IN.11. 1111111111111111111111111111111111 SIINIS'00G�II10 I'111 lII ,1111 1111111 1 111 1111111111111111.; • SII 1I,� II II I pl 1s II !I1100,01L.. a to 1111111111111111111111111 it 1111 1111111 IIV 11111 L pl111•1111110,l III III 11 11110000000000 IVl11IIIIV 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 NIN�NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111 N 11 101100011111111111111111111111111111 1 111,0 wI 1111111111111111111111111111 I 11 111 01, w II,III � 110 1'111•1 V Is 1"' 11 ..IttOttlIlltr 1.1 11,. 111 11 ollo11111'1 '11111,'1 81111111 01100,11000,00 0111.01,01 ���d))d) �� 1•1•1•11 I II 1111111111 000111111100000000000 1•11 �'ulIw'n♦M 4w0Il� edI 1111p1111111 ppu ... I1d1Npl��f I 1 00,00o.1N 1 yy I wllll IAI10A1P� 1� 1111 111 Leawood, Andrews g0, Pre MOM. I x., 1100011010001010100wow111j�Al III 11111111111 111111 11111111 01110 „iv wwww; (IIII" p r"'Ipl Iwww 11111111111 orktOdsttoreszOttc..9 cw n a,ed Mitts/gol'haec.+.w 1111.7 re Plan .:.mvrrrn4';w'eid r,r:uis tiircw�-'r rIE..u1r,„r4Owap'ti§ lei 11; 1111111111111111111111i1111II 1111 R1R111I11 oollol I 1•1 • 11 olool0000ll� y 111 111111 .� 0m,... Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 18 1 P City of Port Aransas Flood Hazard SSSSS\NMMISSSS\W ISSUIRISS Istaimalsi siammitall ummtramma Riverine Localized Corpus Christi Bay Coastal Gulf of Mexico 13 — 1% event* ISSEEMESSI 1111:5131•111111 8 (all flash floods) 0 death, 0 injury �r-,gid yISSSS.S\.\nit 111-AUISSISTIMISSSI 12% annual chance 8.25 years sssssszraas mum sumG u mu= 11,345 $34,933,446,050 8.56 0 100�00�11�1,,,,\,I 1111 »„111,»MEE ,,\,,, IC »»�,1111 aISSSSS\TIMZZnSS\S\S »„1,,,1a,1.11.,,,1�lal�,,,11�. a 1�a1,�al . , �„ �� \V��,,,1,1y,V111,1,1„1 V>a>,9„ 1 � ,9,II ��I I1 � � .�.I1 .��.�. � . 1..Ila 0�� �I 1„x,11\ �11 ,\\\,o�I,I�\111 m 1 fl� 1�»11 \..1"� 11\II�»�11\�111A��1111\III1111�11�111\II�111\I��A1�I�,ll�5,1\1»�\11)1\Y�,„�`�\��`�1\���������\�������������\�����\�\��� �111\11111111111,1�111�,1\II�II���IIII\1111\11\1@ I�`���"III��IIIA\I\II�IIAIIII\IIII\IH�\111111I\�P11\1111\IIII\11��11111\II\�II\11���\�1 19 $993,444.31 1 $122.378.68 ,,,,\, \\ » 1.11 �I\11 , »11», 11\\\ »» \1111 \» »»»»1 »1111 \,,,, 1111, ,», \\, I .111»» 11\ »» » � � 111 ,» 1 1 1v o1 � v 111 1� � ,ta ,11 uulauoaal.l�.l01� 001��10 tiV1�»olllilioul�lllai 1 1���11�oa111a��1o�lliuo 1�11uooa»111 1�o1111y lololl lila. �ulal�ol.�ti.oaa a�llllo v�11�1111oil�ua»IV�1i�loi �, �a1V 111111 1 y 1V\ 110111\111 V n, 11111 ..111111 111p119119�V11 �\ 111. n, 11\..1111 V 1 \V1UI� PV\\1111111VVI �„ �V �1\V11 1 11194\ \ �VV1011 V n, 11..111 ..11111111 \ .., .., II II ., 9 »I �� m, .1 a m, m, „.. ,., II �� fl� . Ix„ II l� X11\\I\\1»IIlu1�11»��»r�»11»�11�1111h»�»II9111�1»I��1»Im»I»�»I�1»��1111»�m�»O�m»111»�,»�,1»��IN�»I111�II�i1111ia»�IIIIh1�1��11�Ia11��m11»»�11»�»I111�u»I»�,.1111�v7»�»fti��ll»,21.�1l�»l�»�v»l�l»�»»»�,»��\0���� ������������������»l�al»�1��1»I�1��111»»»�»II,�»N���»m�»6��»6t111�u1»»�»II�»I»�»��he»�„11»»�»1��1�»»»�»111»��»I»,�»�N�\v�»�1»»�»�v�»�»�1»I»�1»Iv����������������� 2-4 Family Residential 1 Assmd. Condo 1 Other Residential Other Nonresidential Single Family Residential »» 1 „\ ,111 1 , » „1 „» 1»1»»II»»»II»» 111 �\ »I »\,1» 1111 „» 1»1»»II»»»II»»,111 »»»,1» 1»»,1»1\,1,,,,,»„»»» 1»»»»I»,,,,,1\ 11»11»I »»»»,1\„\ \ „\, u ,,, ou „ 1 li, a 1 ,» i � V � u 1 1 V � >>1 � 1 V \ nn „ nn nn „ n n 1110 111\\I\\�»mo�111»II»�»III»�»III»��II�I�\I��»I111�11»�Imial»»11»I�»I»��1„� nlll\`�”�`�`�`�`»mu�mll»I111�111»I�11»I1��11�1�»I»I��»'V»4@»IIID,11»,�»IIIA\1»II91i1»,1111»,Ilr��l»I��1����»I�1»,11`0�»I,1»�,IV191V»Ni�1�6,lamw���\�\�\��\�\ Dam South Jetty Dam Fire Station School 2 6 10 ,,,\ »» »,\, ,1»1,\»„��,�„ �,» 1» 111»1,1,» ,,,\,\ »»I »,,,1\11» »»I» »»» 1111311111111 0\1\11111111�� �y, ;111»�;I�» I11; Il� �,�i1�111%»S ME11�1;�;il ,111�»,�1; Port Aransas Fire Department Port Aransas Fire Department Bundrett Middle School Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 19 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-7. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Port Aransas dN ,,,,,,,,111111111111111111111111111111111111;1111111111111111 111111111111 poi MAZE Cazrtj 4,Ax*wood..Afidmewo SNA IJ hN- a riscActiY]T'h',a'I'Hazard Homan'. Xr . MiltAdallean Aeti n, 1,13tw'r Current end Pf8H134113P: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 20 1 P a e City of Robstown Flood Hazard ISISISSWERIS.SISIM SISCMIRSIS 11111111111aSI imanantatal imam. imam Riverine Localized flooding Localized Nearby creeks Updated FIRMs and FIS are forthcoming. This extent value comes from the effective 1986 FIS. 14 — 1% event IMSS\S.SZMEIII.SSS\ �y aSaallignal 13 0 death, 0 injury sssss.smzznsss.s.s. R�e�t, f...<....... �._<'��ccP� sassurmssam 19.7% annual chance 5 years um= =non ow= mu= 5,934 $3,619,085,359 15.83 3.43 ssssssurtwznsss , 0 sEmcatimm,��������������������������' ��������� � ����i�,�,»��»,�,»��,», »�,�»,�,a,»�,�����N»�,,�»»� �,������� IEEE" 13 $305,465.37 0 $0 », m » ,�„ of ,,,, a, a ,,, ,� � ,ta ui EMI i � u u iia uo�� i o .iia 1� a��� �i� � y��i������ 0��1 tiauti5�u� �i� ilii i�� ii��ii�iii i� a„ ������ �� v � ����o��� i� s��i���� y•�o� o�� a���� . u iiia ��o� . �ti .o a 1� a��� � �o ���»��>>��u� tiauti5�u� �i� poi ��va>wa�1����, ���01� ��ltitiU�ua� n ���� ��»> q�p�l�li�ui��a�i�� n �o� v�� � ��u�o�a'zN�������u�l ��tiuwu������ � � �01��\��u��o��vn ��»u ��1»��� ��) �, 11111 1 �) �11�� ^ �) 11 �) � i II\\I\uN@,iu»»�,ai»��»»�1�»,�,��e»�»,11,,�,�»»�,��a»,�»�m,�m»�»»��,IiVm»,�m�m��»»�»4�»»�m�»»�,14�„�»�»1N1`��i»i41�»�Ilmll,�i�mll»Nf»��i,�ma�m»�m�»��mm»V.u,��m,�,11�»,�,�»»a,.�1�\»�0�,»�»��Im��,m�u„��� h111,`�”�`�`�`�`�`��`�»�I��u,��»»a��»4�,»�1»N»»��ou»�»,�11��»�m�i»w,l��»Nlu��,�,»'N�.uo'�i»�,»�lu�u`lily»�»�Imu��»»��u»�»u»Iii»,��u»i�»»�»�m�»0��,»ak,�»»�m��,»a`R,�,�1\,»�14�,m��111111�1„�`�`��1�`�`� Other Nonresidential 1 Single Family Residential 12 »» »» ti»,»»�»»»�»» u�a u m »o �» ,ti »„ �»m»a»»»�»» ua »»u, m »�»» i»�»» iu�» »»�a m» »»�»„o,�, ,�m�», » a �»»o„ , ,o, o„ m» ,» u�»iu,�o,�ao oo»,o »�,»»�a„ v,,, m»�, »�,,, „u»,»�» m»ai „u v»»,o , »» u >u u � 111 111�� nn „, nn nn „, n t ,„„ n „ J nn „ n \ �� n ,, n,„ 111i1�»i�llll»»�mu�»u»,»1m,»��a,111\I11�\,mm��»,�am11\»,1,»i��a»»w1111111111 h�`�"�`�`�`��»X10'»»�»»��umou�»»���,I�»u»�11�u11u��11»,A111111iu,»�»�IN11»NI�11�mu�umu1��»MI»»�II�1,»�mu��»�»n1»,�Ih11,»I�II�'�I»�116������������ h�`�”�`�`�`�`�`��`�`�`�`������\�»�101u1uu»,�`»�»�,»a,��ud111�»»�111111,�Miu��N1,»111111»NI�1�»Nk�»'1Vuu»a��,l����1»»�»ipY»,�»�»a»>�,»a»»111�»,�m1,»I����»II��»�m�111,1,\1�1„��"""""\„������������ Emergency Operations Robstown Emergency Operations Center Robstown High School Robstown Seale Junior High School Lotspeich Elementary School San Pedro Elementary Robstown Emergency Operations Center Robstown High School Robstown Seale Junior High School Lotspeich Elementary San Pedro Elementary Hattie Martin Early Childhood Center Solomon P Ortiz International Robert Driscoll Jr Elementary Salazar Crossroads Academy Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 21 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Robstown Wastewater Treatment Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 22 1 If" a g Figure 6-8. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for City of Robstown 0„..0.0.000400001001110 a fI ��� °IpDlomwww IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII......... III IIIIIPfIIi IIIII1 IIIIIIIh9111o1111, uuiuluuuuuuuliIIull,uullllllllll00� 00000m001 V 1110 010 00010II ,„000000000000000000000000000000000000000,000000000000000000000„0,,,, I III "1'10 0111110000uii,01,00lllll 0000A0 0.0:1010.0000,0 ��I'��I19l.IIl1u.lIl1.00lIll�11.lI11.l1 01uI1”1Il1I11l1u�1"111I100l6u1"l�llv4uIll10-l"llip1ulll1, u"lI1"l' 1r4I1"I1r1I1"lI1I1,fvId4IlI1IiI10I1„I10I1I1I1I40I1 I1I1I1 I1I1I1I1I1I11IiII1I1"1,I1"11,jju VI"IIIlI"IlIIlI"IIII"uII",uInIilId iiIlIlIlfIIIuIlilI d u0 I�IIlI'NI�I'I"IIlII�I Iy�;ar1, ,+7�i�I jI�l(I�1I"Id'JI"luNJ"lIJ 11111111 "qII'�00I�j0"�I00' i 1:1:1'",11.1; IJ�� 0 I11.11,�.1�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI�IjI llhl111111dI1111 ll�lIIllllllll011111111,111110,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,„1,„1,1,:1,1,1,1„.1 „,,�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 0000000100000010001010101010100.01000.00.00.000000000IIlii 1Y 1 1p ((III I, IIinIulI, III 10000000000000'''''''''''''101111111111100100000000,00000,0„. 0100100000000000I�U10 IIIIIIIIIIIIiu llllllll)l11llllllllllllll0000;,,,� 00..0.004000000'"°; °0101111111111.1.01.1.011101.00 00 0 UW �ol�.11 e 61 III IY�I,;'111111111111111110 0001011111111111111111111111111111011 • �>IIn 11un 11011 NIHolo 11 Y.. sd1 01111000001, 0,011 111 F 111111111111111111111111111 Lrbr:W rr zaml. Arldrith 14 1444w4w4m0 Un^r. 01110 0000.„000000000010000111,110110000000000100000001000010000001111010000000000000000000000000000000,0000000000000 CA,Lec ,0s, 00:'.;aaa,.u,G^/ 1/idCY-,'LurdadkC'S;enad Hazard M01003, ?donAc'aonPian 110000 lent and Plrettrninan; 001E1110A0111.0014,013Tv 10100101 III° ,1011111111111111111111111 1111 1 111111111111 11 IIu101 611 „a 1y „ ";;J:,11 0 11 'jilprr;;vllill$ Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 23 1 P 0003 000000 0P Port of Corpus Christi Authority Flood Hazard III\3\1\JNPjwIalpllsISNII*MAssmml\l)\II\AssltlltllIllsl\tw tssfitfi\Astam`zwiusu Coastal Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay 12 — 1% event* *Updated FIRMs and FIS are forthcoming. This extent value comes from the effective 1985 FIRM. SSWEEInntISEMERAS1 No records* No records* SSSSS\E•t\SSSSS\ SIVIMIEntnalaSSIMMIESSSI 1% annual chance* 100 years* *PCCA owned property is located within Unincorporated Nueces County. Flood event records for the county do not indicate which events impacted PCCA owned property. At a minimum, according to the FEMA floodplain maps of the area there are ��at1 Etrantao\ lillVrlrrlllyllrtantdllenMUElolloo�� 11�� o�aool� loll 1 log 1 0000 loo ��� \ � Doll �11 0\ 111� 1 101 111 oll l111 0� 011111111 X1101101 \ \\�1 111.. \1� \\\\0\111 \11 .11 . \1 .\ 1 11lel � I1 �111�11\ �� ��\ �\11 IDI n, „5�� �1� �\�I\\\\\ � �1 � „ !I1 �1� \\ �\ �\\ , � 11 a , 345 $174,026,681 .8 21.5 lssssslttzrzsss\s\1\ �t vornimartow1 x\11 � � �I � 10 1 Ir\\�I�I�a1�`I�o� 111 �`�,� ol�l�1 1�1 � n \� I1�1� 1 � �1I� �� ��� II �I I��,�,�.,��In,„��»„�,����� ���`��1��1�\��1�����������������\\\»�����\��`��� ����1�,�,��,��,,,��„�,�,��,�„�,��,��In„�,,�„����1�1��������1�,���„�,�,�,�,�� �,��,����,�,�,a�a��„�11�111 o so 0 so Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 24 1 If” ,n g Figure 6-9. Map of Current and Preliminary FEMA Floodplains for Port of Corpus Christi Authority Property 11111111, ' ro, rh41i iiia „�,,; --010411111111 111 %»111111111111111111111 imiu,a o V��t WDM„,kd'roabwAA urron, IIlp,roiw, Cw�'t.b.,yr,�rie tb4;µrro�rnaat Hazard Nktrooimool At'lon Plan CaIrrent ir7C9 P'rctrox"Iolar°.y Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 6 25 1 P ,n ,2 11111111 111111111m 1111111111111 11111111111111 1((((((((11111 1(011111 Drought Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Drought Hazard 7 City of Aqua Dulce Drought Hazard 8 City of Bishop Drought Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Drought Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Drought Hazard 11 City of Petronila Drought Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Drought Hazard 13 City of Robstown Drought Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Drought Hazard 15 Drought Hazard Overview Description Droughts can be classified as meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, or socioeconomic droughts. A meteorological drought is a reduction of precipitation from the expected average or typical precipitation patterns. A hydrologic drought occurs when below average rainfall impacts streams, lakes, reservoirs, and groundwater levels. Agricultural droughts are brought on by insufficient moisture in the soil, typically impacting crops. Socioeconomic droughts occur when water demand exceeds supply due to a precipitation -related supply shortfall. Droughts may initiate or exacerbate other hazards, such as extreme heat or wildfires. Location The spatial extent of a drought tends to be relatively large, often stretching across multiple counties. Consequently, the entirety of Nueces County is vulnerable to the impact of a drought. Crops and livestock are vulnerable to drought. The overwhelming majority of agricultural land is found in the western portion of the county, mostly in unincorporated Nueces County. Additional information about agricultural vulnerability can be found in the jurisdictional tables. Extent The Palmer Hydrologic Drought Index is a value calculated monthly by NOAA. The PHDI index takes the balance between environmental water supplies and demands. The index Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 1 1 If" ,n typically ranges between -6 to +6. Negative numbers indicate a period of drought. Positive numbers indicate wet periods. Table 7-1. Drought Extents ISSVZEMttMSISI - 0.5 — -1.0 - 1.0 — -2.0 - 2.0 — -3.0 - 3.0 — -4.0 < -4.0 Occurrences , 1i1�11 � ` 001 1 o1�a � l 1 1 11 � 1 � 11 111100 01111�111�1111 101001011111\11�� ti1�1�\\\\0\111 � 11,1\ .101 \\111 111 1 \1\1 ( 1 \ \���10�1��10�1�1���1,,;„1,1,`;,1�„,,„\;,,;;�����„���;�„y��\�1�0�1��1���\���� Normal Incipient Drought Mild Drought Moderate Drought Severe Drought Extreme Drought Droughts in Nueces County typically occur in the summer months. The months of June through September have the lowest average PHDI. PHDI values for Nueces County come from a NOAA North American Drought Monitoring station (USW00012924) located at the Corpus Christi International Airport. Table 7-2. Summary of Nueces County Drought Occurrences issvratirrimpal 11 �l000u �1 1111` � 111urenoto�� 11111 111 110X 1 1 111 111D1 ��11 1mem1 � � 11111111001�01111111111,.110101 � „ m�,� � �� �m \ � n� ,,, 11111 e Incipient Drought Mild Drought Moderate Drought Severe Drought Extreme Drought Total Months of Drought (PHDI <-1) 39 5% 164 21% 113 15% 63 8% 15 2% 357 46% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 2 1 P a 11111111111..111.1111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111IIIIIIIIIm°IIue X141141111111111111111 0 111111111111111111111111101101.1.1111111 1111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111.111 111114 X111 ,� Vllu 1111111Vm 111\ II1�11111111111 II11\\e PoinpO 1114 u\ A " 11o1aaeil 110. 1df`11 11/I e11V11./1 g1111111 u 111011101110111ou111m1!1011 .1V 1e,V111 u1!'1„11u111!1m111e11u111lY 1\\\ m11lelmIII1111I!111 o11o111� 101 11 000 1111111 11 t..0 1111111111111111111111111111 11111111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 u 1 11111111111111111111111111 III 1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 ;1111 w 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111;11111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 uzlmu1111 111111111111 X1110 11111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 11111111,111111111100.111111111o.„'1111111'1111111111111 I11111111111111111111 V14'.0111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 II IIII 111111111111 lAlppl A. 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11i�I�Y' ig11111111!e11111111111111i11, e 1111Uigi9111!luol ILNpmm1111111 e1111, 1 SII AL... 181oI1111 II 1s1, I.l00000i9i0l00 00, I0IUpPoi0ii a00.0.000.000000000,1�r,1 11�IVIIV e11�111NI1�1101m11Vilaee g111110l0i000i1011110001 0111 111110NII11 uV111\11111100nllllililnVNllleililliil' 1\1111�'i1111!III!lump0'pNe N� 111 1, 11'111' 1,umy' u�111\11il0li0l0li0l0i06li0l000tii�1111p1�1' V1"1 iViiilp!!Ip!PIN"�'uiiuiiillllll�' Ili„IY IIT^p11\ 0liilliil0iiil�idl0liil0liilliil0liil0liil0 too `d) \\11\ 1„Y II„, Il lelil p11\11111.11110101.0000epiil0liilliillipY' 11Uu1ii!Illlpmlm 1llliiii0! II 1.. I;1g 401116101160011111116001116110' p111111u0ullll'", °iN olllllll` 1\ 1' r I mI 1,�Y1u 101111)'111)111t"11)1111"11;14 %' ep1III'1 11 1uIII1pl" 10"11111111111111Y 11IY11111111t1111111111' ep11Uu1111111',°, °i 111 'iil 111\III I 040° VIII; 111111\101 101 l011p6101\10m0m0np011 IIV1II111ulmpl;!, ei m uV111\1x11,\.„„\oiiii0i111„1' ep11i111ux1!ip°�, "p 1141m`I u111N1101�10p'iOtlIPtl10p10010 111111111ii1�lA liil�liil�l0010 .\\i\i.\A111ii�iiii , „;0111111 1Vg"..i..\"1 \"1..'11bii11giiii 10, 100' 111, 1 p1100101000610001000000011' Iry%!, 1 up1116i, 1p11111mi1ui61i11)1ii61i1111i�11i010 0� 1,1110.,,,„ I ll�l";'l„IN'rlu!�11�iiimq 1, ,0000000000000.0000.0, II0000,1 11U9i 01111111111111111,1I1`IIIIIIIV r1,': log it 110 ',00000000.000.00000,00, 1w 0u!Vlllllll0lllllllmim"11. 01, 1111101101101.0110111011011011011010' 4''.1110111)91�IIui�IVIIIIIII�IIIIIUIIIII�i�N11� 111\11,GWTi1�`° li�!uj 1110010111111111.1111011111111111111111111111111' 11Uulillp��IpIIIVI10111111P,!5, III r04.0.PI�RVIIV' 00101.11111111.0.111111111110111.11110' )11IIuGIu�liui010�ill`giu 11\Il 'Wa1 1111; �1�1p1\01�ml�1iiljp610m0mii6iiog,' I " 1111 \". 1 11 1 u 11.. 11 IIIIIIII I 1U "11W VII IIII 111111110110110110110110110111011011' 'p11'1y'1.i''IIIIIIIII'Illllll,1', . Table 7-3. Nueces County Historical PHDI Values (1948 - 2017) 6 \I I IIII 11 III 111 1111 1111111 �1i1 " 1 liiiulll V"� 1 11111151111111V e\1 II �IIw1„l\eu„u^^,.NIVIIIIIIIIIN\;^\IIr IIII\. 1111119'iolam\mfflglo6ioll' 11111111io1lo1l01l011011o11'ioliolloli $111111111011011011011011o11o6i eW o u„ 1110 III III1"111111 u du1111i1i1,e� I . ' 1\1 I ,111 � D„ 1 1 1.\11111' 11111111111 \\1111111111 om�1111oi11ol1i1ol1oll �Vu11111iiuiiuiiuiiuiilliiel�Ihi111111 �Vu11111iiuiiuiilliiuii11ii11ii11iiuiul -0.05 -0.07 0.61 0.61 -0.17 -0.72 1111111111111111 Iln:11111111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1111111 111111111 ,IIIIII III 111.14 111111 1111111111111111111 quiuli1 uu II. 6 u1m11111111.. Il 11111.,1, 1 111 1 om 111111111111111111 mHll11110111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111', H.. 0.79 -0.85 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ®UMe ��uwiluu�Ill� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII In12 ..110111111111111111111 1112 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111 1111111111111111111 111111111,1, 1 dll11ll..lr4 II illlllll I 1111111 11wIII IVi IIII ..� 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 11111111I II 11111111111111111111 1uIIIII11u 1 11111111111 III 1111111111111111111 111 �x� 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111,,,, 1111111 1111111111111' .111,11,1111111...,, 11111 Il.um..u11u 111 moi '111111111111111 IIIII III umIlii 11 1 -0.77 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i111111111111111111111'111 X111• W� i1w11� Illvourtoontronot III 1111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111m 11111111111111111115111111111111111, i1m1111mpmW1 1111 luluuu!ae 1111VIIIVIIIV �VAA11111111111111111111111111111111V uu1111111111N1V mumumumum��mu p %1111111111111111111101111111111.....„. liiilimumiiuuiIlm iiiiiiiiP IIIIIIII„ ��IIQII�1111,,,, 1 1 \l 11 \\ 111 \ 1111 1 u e d 1� \ u a Illi 1� II ,, , , a lol�l01�1'$111111111x!ilol�l0610111o6eoilol1lolol�l' -0.84 0.3 -0.4 -0.85 -0.63 000 II 1 1jilll 11111l1111111111III a't^t19 11 11 I�11II111111111 IIIIwlw1 11111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111 IIIIIIIii1111111IIII 1 0 11111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 111111111111 mm1 1 111111111111111111111111.11111111111..........1111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII111111111.111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 PAw!� u11u 1111111111111111111111111 111 001111.111111111111111111111111111 3.41 4.17 3.77 3.22 2.45 1.59 1.04 2.05 2.72 2.32 2.23 2.5 2.97 3.21 2.37 2 2.23 2.61 2.31 2.31 2.13 4.7 4.31 3.58 3.96 2.97 3.18 3.63 IIII 1...!IIIIIIIIIIIII 1111 111111111111111111111111111111 hum 2.09 2.52 -0.6 1.05 1.89 1.76 2.48 11111111111 ro 11111 1111111111111 1000000001.04l1/141l1.1111.1110.1011111111111111111.. 111111111111 "I. �uuuuuum umiumiiiiil' °I'IIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111110111101111111111 11111111.1111111111111 1111111111111.0....111111111111111..Ill 11111111 X111.1111111111. 11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11111111,11,1 11111111111 mmm'dy 111111111111 31111uii... m uuuuuuui1111111111111111111uuu I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuluuuuuu 1111.11111, 111111111111 2.18 2.59 -0.74 111111111 1" 11"1111.0.11111 2.15 1.56 1.64 nnm�nnnm 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111,,,,,,1111 "1 11111 2.07 2.28 0.89 10°u111111 1pl0uuuuul� 2.07 0.99 2.49 1111111111111111 11111111111.1.111 11111111111111111111 immummum 11111111111111 mu. 1.111.11.1111111111,11111111.1111. 11111.111111111111 11.111111111111.1101.orr 1111111e loo Hsu 11 11111111111111111 1, Illlllllllllll 1111... 111111111111111111111111111111111111mm111 ,,,,,,,,,,A111111 111111111 111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 II. 11111111 HIIII6IIIIIIII IIT 1111111111111111111 11111111111 1111. luuw 1 i1 000 111101011 p11IIIIl1i111111111111� 3.5 2.75 3.3 "1"1"1"1"1"1"1"1":1 111111111111101111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 W 'i1lp ""IIIIIIIIIIIII 111 1111111111 11111111111111, 111111111 „,„„ „„.,.uuuuuu ii 11111.117 PIII1un 4IIIII1uu 111111111111 ..lye 111 1.01 2.04 2.38 2.48 2.46 411 1.84 2.32 0.38 rwwww1111111111111111111111111 1.9 0.89 1.87 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111.....dllllllll6 111 11 ................ 3.37 1.86 0.6 IIIII1i1�u11i11111114 1...11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 4.57 0.91 1.87 �Ip1�11111111�1 2.51 2.51 2.13 1.86 1.51 000 N11111111111111gl1�ll tiiiil.2 uuuuuuuu.111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111112 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ,1,1,11.11111111111111111".111111 111111111111 816 Illllilll 6.04 000 III 1111 2.17 11111111111111111'101,,'111I 1111111 2.76 2.47 0.85 111 �11101.0 11111 5.43 0101 u1 uuuull 1 T 3 111 2.61 2.92 00 1110 11111 111111111111 11 " 111111111111111 2.7 1.93 2.63 11111..11. ,11111'.11 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.83 2.83 5.13 gluuu1111ouu1uuuul uuu 11111111111111111 1111111111 3.26 2.09 2.97 3.01 IIIIIIIIIII IIII�IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111 111111 11 1111111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 111111 1111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 111111 111 m'M 1111111111111111 1111111111111111111 I III'd11�19 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 i..... a .11.1„11.1.111111111.1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 "..II IIII1SIIIIII11., 11111111111 X11111"... 1.54 3.19 3.01 1.57 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111.... 11 111111111111 mmW uu11.1. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.04 2.85 4.72 1111111111 111111 11111111111 ww!'1.1111111I00 0000 3.11 2.32 2.15 4.08 1111111111111111111111111111 11111111111,1,1,1111111111111111111111 1111. 1111111111111111111111111111 1 1111 uuuw� 11111111111...11" . ®1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111.11...111111111111 i1�1 111 .....0000000.111111111111111111111111........ 1 loll 111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111. „I 1 01.1.1.1.1.1,1111 01uu��w 1111.11....111111111111111111 �.z. 1.4 2.86 3.1 1.11 'wW.1p'N.w!N'N1uw.W.wlw IIIIIIIIIII m 00011100 11 111°IIIIIlV11°19111111 2.4 4.23 uuuuu1111111111111111111111IIllqu.1; a uuuull 1111111111111111111111 2.69 1.94 2.23 3.39 IIIIIIIIIIIII 111.1III I 11' 11 p,11111i1, p Iii lomomol\lomo lolno61o6e' 1 innuoll111101mito "1I IIIIL111 IIS 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 1iiiiiiiiiiii 1111111111111 1 ' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1..11„„„„„„„„11�u111llip 111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 II 011111.'mw 1111111141 2.07 2.57 4.79 0.56 111111111111 11111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 '111111111 1""1111111 11111111111111111111111 111111.11 11111111111111111111111111.00 illlloW 2.03 3.34 -0.88 1.86 2.22 1.67 2.62 11111111111 1111111 1.111111 111 11111.11111112 111111111111111111111 11111111 I Ip1111111 11 i1112 2.74 2.34 1.69 2.3 3.22 3.27 I!�ptl101�101�101�101�10oV' p11lII11m!ulu!uV11�111V1111�111i1 1111111111�11Y1i11 ��1 �"IY111 �" i°i' 3.58 3.21 2.93 4.07 3.66 3.54 3.2 2.12 1.1 1.03 0.75 000 111 III1 11 111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 7 3 1 II a I' 6t:� 1111111111111111111111111111111111 2.67 3.15 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1111111 i ivu avoloorliolla 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Doi 11111111111111 5.71 3.34 2.13 2.4 �i 0;II11111� 100000000.0000,..100111 - 0.57 5.16 5.22 1.96 2.18 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111 llllllllll 1100 1111111111„10000,1 4.95 1.98 1.92 0000111 000111111110000111011111000000000 ,11 11111111111110 2.03 2.72 2.57 5.37 1.03 1.77 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .n0'0.1111111111 ..'011000000001111110 1.19 0.92 - 0.92 3.26 3.06 1111 Elul00000000111111111111111111111111 00000,,,,,,,1 111101111101111111111 1111 al1111111111 VIII 11 4.72 5.1 1.39 1.54 111111111,1 ued 2 2.14 1.85 1.26 1.29 -0.83 1111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 .1110011111111 11111111111 111111.100 111111111111111111111 11111111111111 ilii uumu1� 1.12 2.26 1111110 10 1:11 1 1111111111 0000000000.00 100000 1111111111111111111100.111111111110.100....01000000.1100.0111110 Table 7-3. Nueces County Historical PHDI Values (1948 - 2017) (cont.) 1 1a �� �� 10 1�i o �� a � o� o � �� u10 o ���� 1 �� 1» 1»i 11a� � � �� oft � � � " � u ti \ �1\ X01 00 11.111111111 \ 11 ,III 111 110 .11110011111 \\\\111110101 /11/011101 \ �1 .11111011111 �111� \ 1011 X11 1 1\�0�1 1 111 0 110, 111 111111 0 1011 1 \ 1 1 110 \ 0 � �II� � .. m 1 m 0 � y., �� � � An � . �� um ��7� An ,u,. �� , , An An � ��, �1 11 � �� �� � l ( �� ���"��`��`��`��`��`����������������������������o� 1����11��0�����`1"1"�iia�`I`1V`i����a��a�`1�i�����"1`i�����o����������„�����i�1�Ihi����,N1iii0��i�01��������oi�`�`�11\0\�������� m0�\\�,0\�������o��`\`I��������i����```i�������������ol����������������������010\1`0`���\��`���`����\���\����������������� `�111ii`ii olilam�1111J J uu IIII .II 1.71 �1�11om1111i0iiiii� 1.ett,,mm �r,1„^� 2.39 1.9 1.9 2.42 2.7 2.68 1.76 1.36 0.81 ull 2.46 2.27 2.59 2.33 3.63 3.61 3.04 4.74 4.12 3.67 3.69 2.87 1.21 0.75 0.66 -0.43 2.59 1.89 1.45 0.87 0.57 -0.76 0.95 1.41 1.31 1.43 0.79 -0.33 -0.74 uu -0.74 -0.81 1.82 2.92 2.55 2.38 2.55 2.83 01010101010101010101010100000000000000010111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 .1111111111111 10101111111111111111111111 111111 plilliq 00000000000000111111111111111000000000000000 Ipluu11111111100""111001.1111111111111111 "111111111111 MTV 11���1�1ia11i111mi0a11m lit ;$111: �1111 u �1\�111o1>r11�111101111p1 8111111�11111�1111V lill ��1\�111o1>r11�11110111111 � � ti,W3 ��" Ptib 111118111111111�11111�111 112"\\E aia111"\\E �1�11om�11�11i�p1�i1!! wpm �1����1i1m11i�m1�ii�a1 ��1�11om�11�1mu1iiialam i�1����1ii1�i��1��ia���o�1��1\� �1�111om�11�1mgq�iiiil ���1�1���1111��1m1���m v. nail ��i�1'`1oi�11�1mm111u�mi�1 � m�i1��a���11��°1 t 1�i�10o1a��a1im111�ii 0 m��1��a��i1l��ii1 ���01 �i�10o1a��a1im1111uui1 � e uo uo 4�� m1�11���1�01111�11110l ������11mm11����11����1 itir����iiill��oi1 i���iiil���o�1 11i°� ����ii1a1111J TIT"' (11111�1��1111�111 it `,11,�`11�I11� 1`111111 10.1111111111000111.100001100..........0000010 000 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1110 111 1 000 011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1011 11111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 9 III „ 111 I. 111111111111111111111111 0111111111111 n.1'111'1'1,11 1101 3.28 1.99 1.86 2.14 1.63 ul1111 l 111100111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111000 11111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 10000100111111111111111 3.7 1.7 1.45 1.95 0.88 110101010101 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00000.„., .11111111111 4.38 1.96 1.99 3.13 011 II 1111111010100000000000100 0 1111111111111111111111 1.07 1.21 1.66 111111111111111111111111111111111111111a11.111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111010.11111111111101010101010 1.61 1.75 0.08 .1.0 010000000000 110101110 010000000000 0000 000.1,1110. 1.04 1.47 0.23 ............111111111111111110.01111111 111111111,111111111111111111 ',...00001010101011111 uV 111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 4.78 2.24 2.54 2.68 10011000111010111111111111111001111000100000000001 111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00 1 0.57 1.51 0.09 -0.68 1.73 1.04 1.34 1.07 2 1.16 0.96 0.83 001111010.11111111111 11111111111 10,111111 ,..01,100 01 '11111111111111 1111111111 11111111111111111 11111111111 Ill, 0.11 00 uu 1111 u ""10111111111100001,111"000000 2.68 3.84 2.62 4.16 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2.48 3.2 2.32 5.17 u!III 111111 1.87 2.58 2.83 4.4 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.92 1.9 1.65 11111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 1111111 01 i loll 11111111111111 1111111111111111110000000 - 0.74 4.28 4.08 0.64 1.7 - 0.91 111111111 I1u111 11 ul 111111111111111111111111111111111111101 000000000000000000011,011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111000000000111110101010101010100011010 Illlu 01010101010 1.31 1.21 0.91 0.8 1.11 hili ,u1u 2.07 0000101010.00.10 11llllilllllul 1111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuuuuu 1.21 3.66 2.96 0.83 1.27 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111 11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00 11111111111111111000. 111111111111 1.35 II 0.1.0111111111 11111111111...1.000 11111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 0.76 2.56 2.22 1.47 2.24 0000101100 11111111111111111111111111111111111 111.11111 -0.69 3.15 1.62 0.85 2.79 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000011000000000 1.73 2.15 2.29 3.86 1010101010101010101010101011,111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 1.31 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0.84 1.69 0.66 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0000000000. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII r� 2.32 2.61 2.27 2.57 2.28 10101010101010101010110110 it010000111111111111111 1.61 1.87 1.41 1.33 1.63 1.29 - 0.61 0.75 1.62 1.29 0.76 0111111111111111111111111111 11110 II 1111111111111111111111111 u 1111111111111111111111111 �m9 2.93 2.86 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00 .00.01010101010 11111111111111111 Il 1111111 1111111111111111 111111 111111111111111111111111 11, 111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111 111111111111111111110m uuuuu 1'� ',1111,1,!,11111111111111 -0.63 '1111 I 0.55 0.02 0.92 2.87 1.87 2.21 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111110100110110010000 hill111 1111111 IIIII1�11111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 1 011 111111111111111111111111011111111,"1 11111111111111 -0.72 1.26 1.09 1.32 11 uuu�111111111111111 11'1111 111' 1111111111 11111,111111111101111111111111111 2.38 1.57 0.83 0.85 11111111111111111111110000000000000111000000,00,00 111111111111 000000000000011111111111111000000000000000 0 111111111111 111111111111111 2.22 1.99 -0.43 1111 wl' 0000000000000000000000000000000000100001110001110110000000000 2.81 2.13 2.2 1.69 0.77 0.76 0.8 0.18 4.72 5.4 4.79 3.85 3.07 2.2 101000011 uu111u1�u1�u1 � 1.95 2.58 1.84 1.28 0.57 111111111 011111 IIII i1i1 1111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 7 4 1 If" a 1111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Table 7-3. Nueces County Historical PHDI Values (1948 - 2017) (cont.) �i ���� o �� � ii � oi»I �,� iii �i� oa ��� � � � 110�0111o��11ti ii � i i 1 1 11 \1\ X111 00 \ \\0\\\\� � 1 11 ,III 10 1111 II IIIQIIIII \\\11111111\11��\1�\\\1�1\1�1 1 �\0� 1111111111\\�alll\\ 10 1 1 e\ 1 1 1 1.111 4 111 1 1 I 1 111 ( � � � � 1 ( 1 w � Att � ., w Ilm �a�� Att ,u w , ,Att Att 1\\1\\\\\��0\\��\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\0000\���,���,�����,��,�1,���,� 1�,1,��,��,1,�„��,�y�,��"���1,�`y\���,���,���,�` �,,,�����1�,��,�`�,��,�1��,���,�`��\\\\ rtn rt wl�lil�a1�1�1�1i�����ii� ooll�a000� 1v1i�111o11���11����ii1 111111\\I1111�11 �gI111P 000000000000,00,0000,0 010101010100' 1°11111111111111111111111 00,00,00,00,00,0000 101011101001111100011110,000,000, 1111111111111111111111111 1111111 111111111111 0 0:11111111110 '1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1111111111;111' 11111111111 11111111111111 111111'1'111111111111111111 11111111111 2.25 2.3 1.53 2.12 3.66 2.88 4.25 3.51 3.06 2.45 2.97 2.19 1.67 0.9 111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00.1.111.11,111111111111 w,111111111111111111111111111 uWw' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 1111111111IIIP1111111111111 111 111111111111 1111111111111111 D1f, 01101010101010101010001 000,000, 110,11 11111111111 w 111111 ,.:111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIwVwwww llllllllllllllllllll 000000000000 IIIIII uul lil 011111111 ®II' 1111111111111111111111 000010 0000' mm �w 1111111111111111 II 1111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 1110,1 iiii I11:11 Moll 01101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101 01111111 II 111111111111111111111111, 111111111 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 I 11111111111 11111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 000000000000 00000000000000001100000 11111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, .11,1 11 1,1,1 ,111111111111111 10000011.01,111111111111 111111111111111 w 111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2.21 3.55 6.22 5.63 5.21 4.55 3.6 2.97 2.66 2.01 1.88 1.14 2.31 2.47 2.82 2.46 1.64 1.52 0.92 .111111111111111111 0001111111111111111011111110111111111110000001 1th 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of months of drought in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. A drought may cover several jurisdictions; however, a drought event is recorded for the jurisdiction based on the levels of severity and the length in time of each occurrence. Table 7-3 provides a general overview of drought severity, probability, and return interval. Probability for future drought events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 7-3. Nueces County Drought Probability �� `�� o a1 � oo11a � 1i� iii oo� 1�o�v ���» 1 a ��» I \ \ 010 a� 11111 11 1 01 1 11 0 11 1 1 11 \ 1 01 11 01 11 1 1 1 1 \11\�10 � 11 00\1 �\ ,11111 11 II 1�1\0\�� 1111 �1\ 0 �l 111111 001 11 1\111 11 111111 �0\����110� 1\l\111�1� \ 00111110\11�11�0�11�1 � �\�\\\\1\� 111\1�ti11\��1 ,\\ 11\�1�1111111\1�1 ,11111.\010\ 1�111ti1111111� ,, N �� ..., AI w, �: 9. ,����„ 9 \ AI ,. AI ,����, 4tt � ,.. �. N- ttk�,.. tt� 9 9 �,. 9. ,����, 4tt ,�� w��� � \ AI ,����„ � ,. \ 11111`����1��`��`111`1�111�`��������11���`1�111�11���\I�1���1����������\�., 11111`���11111�1�11��11��1���`�11�1�11�1�11�I�11�\��1��111�1�'�1��1�11�1�111�1������I �1I�d11111111`�� 11111`��`11111,1�`1�1���1��1��\��1�111�1�1�`111�11�1��1�1���'����1�111111�11�11�1� Incipient Drought Mild Drought Moderate Drought Severe Drought Extreme Drought 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% 20 years 5 years 7 years 13 years 50 years Impact Common effects of drought include crop failure, water supply shortages, and fish and wildlife mortality. There is very low risk of loss of life or damage to structures associated with drought. Droughts may cause water shortages and require regulators to enact water rationing. The impacts of drought tend to be felt most by agriculture and related industries. Droughts can damage crops and pastoral lands and in severe cases, droughts may kill Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 7 5 1 If" ,n trees and cause loss of livestock. Dead vegetation from drought can serve as fuel for wildfires. Crop insurance is purchased by agricultural producers such as farmers and ranchers to protect their investment in the event of natural disaster like drought, hail, or flood. The extent of crop loss due to drought occurrences is difficult to quantify because a drought during a growing season can impact the next two years of crop production. Documentation of agricultural losses due to drought is typically filed by the land owner directly with the policy holder and is not a matter of public record. For this reason, historical crop damages caused by drought is not quantified herein. Economic impacts of droughts may be complex and far ranging. Water is required to produce many goods and services. If impacts are felt in basal levels of supply chains there is potential for measurable downstream effects. The impacts of a drought may be felt by many interconnected industries and may reach well beyond the temporal or spatial extents of the drought. The latest major drought on record was the 2011 Texas Drought which had a total direct cost of agricultural loss estimated at $5.2 billion with an estimated $3.5 billion in indirect cost for a total of $8.7 billion in losses state wide. Some of this cost is associated to the decreased park attendance, demanding $4.6 million just to keep parks open to the public1 Vulnerability Communities with a greater proportion of crop area may be more vulnerable to the economic impacts of drought. Cropland was calculated by using the 2011 National Land Cover Dataset, published in 2015. This data is the most recent data of its type. Droughts may potentiate the effects of other hazards. For example, droughts may remove water from vegetation, rendering areas more vulnerable to wildfires. Wildfire hazards are discussed elsewhere in this plan. 1 Testimony at TWDB Work Session Meeting (October 21, 2014) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 6 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Drought Hazard SSSSSSEENSSS\S\ County Wide (Unincorporated ISSSSS.Sttta\SnS ISSSSSSIZIMICEIIMRSSSSSI 112111t1101 11 11 11111 1111@1 1 111111���1111\11�1111�1�1 11VII 111 1 101111 X1111111. 111 1 DO 100�11�0 � 11 11Ilio /1111111 "` 1 1\ 11 Il 1 1 , 1 11 1 111 �1111�1�11 �i���Im� 1\111\t1U1\\1\�111�11\1\l\1\11 357 i��� �i�i�u5 ii aU �aa��u � ���� ���i�u5 ii aU �aa��u. 7767aa��u.V U111 }�U U111 }�U 0 11 11 �1i\@1 1� 111 � 1i111�a �o��ool ��,� � ��il 11� 1�1� ���� � 11` 1111�¶.��.....1 �o1�i11��i��11 �II` 111II1�11� 1 111 111`,. 111111 �`1 11111�>,1 11 1111 X11 111111111\1111\1111\II`��\��\������\�1�11\111\1�11�� emu, »���»o� �m��.;�;,�a�i,�,y��n�' mu„» �mi� ma�'.�;,������,0�1 m�»��,�110»� m��,���,ti,\l1'itl»� 164 113 63 � oil N\„:7,,,\,\\N".\,,s\nliar. k i. Ire\ 51,97\i",11,‘,„ \s\ as444 , . ,,,,,,,,, ,1,,, aafa�awvsSi 15 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% ISSSSS% I\SSIEMMMM\SSSSWS\SW................................ Values of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. Vr' =iTMia�� ISISS.S1MrtIEER.SSSS 312,734.7 73.77% *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 7 1 If” ,n 11 City of Aqua Dulce Drought Hazard SSSSS111ZNSS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.1t.S\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPlraISSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 ISISISSIM.......................................:....................................................................11\\ N PISS "Ill " "1" " " I 11 111% 111"\)1.\\ ‘111, int\ ‘1111.."' 11711A\1„;„\%\,,t. INA \ \I \ AtINit‘A. .41A t„„tli5% 46% 21% 15% 8% 2% ISS.I.WS.122211,121ISISWSISISNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. SSSSSSEZZMSSSS ISSSSSMMZEMSS SSSSSNMSSSSSS 2.45 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 1.12% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 8 1 If" a City of Bishop Drought Hazard City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\......................................................................:....................................................................is= ;',";11, \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnll\SS\S.S‘S\SSSNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 35.57 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 35.57% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 9 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Drought Hazard StaltrESSIS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\......................................................................:....................................................................is= ;',";11, \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnll\SS\S.S‘S\SSSNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 24632.44 7.64% *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 10 1 If" a City of Driscoll Drought Hazard StaltrESSIS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ '1111r"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\.......................................................................:....................................................................is= \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnnl.SS\S.S‘S\SSSN��Values of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 464.67 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 62.4% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 11 1 If" a City of Petronila Drought Hazard StaltrESSIS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.MS\ '1111r"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPIIrISSSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 11\\vl.t:11\V!1\\v\......................................................................:....................................................................is= ;',";11, \\\ 411t," in\ 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% IISSASSS\Mltlntrnll\SS\S.S‘S\SSSNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. ISSSSSEMIMSSS.% 1111271111111111.11111 926.66 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 79.36% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 12 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Drought Hazard 1 y 1.1 1 4 ���`�`��`����`�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������„,��1,,,�„h,�I�i��,�,”��il,�,,,,���,h,,,�������`��`���`���`������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 357 City Wide � 1 » \ �11�11� IV111Qdd'l�VI �11�t��� 111111111\11�1.1 \111`1\\I fly � �1 i ISMS 1111\11\\tA%%\\WlrgttNlln1"\SW\`� % » \1 ,1,,\\natu \11.11l 39 164 113 63 isan\axm\AmtFras\m\m\ ss." - r -..l\ \• 15 46% 5% 21% 15% 8% 2% 11111 MIN 111 Not Applicable; City of Port Aransas does not have crop or pasture land within its jurisdiction. ISSISSEESSIS 0 *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version 0% Port Aransas lacks crop or pasture lands. However, there are facilities within the jurisdiction that may be vulnerable to drought. Port Aransas has a significant tourism industry. If water restrictions are in place, that may negatively impact the operations of these facilities. While drought is not likely to directly impact tourism, it may lead to indirect economic impacts if drought -related water restrictions lead to facility interruptions. A human being can only survive a few days without water. When discussing the very young, the very old, or the ill, the timeframe can be even shorter. About 23% of the population of Port Aransas is above the age of 65. About 2.4% of the population is below age 5. In total, 25.5% of the population may be vulnerable to drought based upon age- related characteristics. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 13 1 If" ,n City of Robstown Drought Hazard SSSSS111ZNSS City Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.1t.S\ Illr"M r" 71; II\S\S\ISSNIIMRPlraISSSW lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 ISISISSIM.......................................:....................................................................11\\ N PISS "Ill " "1" " " I 11 111% 111"\)1.\\ ‘111, int\ 411,1\:"' 11711A\)„,;.„VL,IAA \ 1 \ %Au.41A t„„tti5% 46% 21% 15% 8% 2% ISS.I.WS.122211,121ISISWSISISNValues of historical crop and pasture damages caused by drought are not available in the public domain by jurisdiction as confirmed by AgriLife and USDA Nueces County Farm Service Agency. SSSSSSEZZMSSSS ISSSSSMMZEMSS SSSSSNMSSSSSS 6580.37 66.32% *2011 National Land Cover Dataset, Latest Version Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 14 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Drought Hazard SS\SttrMNSSSS\ 11111110�11111111111111171 11 1 111111�\111�1�1\�111171� 11 1 1,1 X1\01111 X1111111. 1111 X11 DO `�i 100�11�� � 11 111 hal\\ 11 "` 11 1 1\`� 1 X11 10 \�11 �11�11 �i�� �m� h�hh`1hh\\h`�hhhh�h�h��\\hh Jurisdiction Wide SSIS11%.1\111111.1t.S\ Illr" Mr"IIISS\S\S";12qPllraISSSW 71; lC aA� s 357 39 164 113 63 15 ss r"\N"sssssm"F""m""ttms‘s‘llssl ur \. ia\ ‘.t4,1,r1 nsS�S1 � r � a,S{� �i r�i: �� �,�� �'r ;tm„m„, � ,46% 8% 5% 21% 15% AUVAIS Not Applicable; PCCA does not have crop or pasture land within its jurisdiction. 2% 11112171 ISSISSIZEMISS SSSSVIMSSSSS 0 0% While PCCA lacks crop or pasture lands, there are facilities within the jurisdiction that may be vulnerable to drought. Numerous facilities within PCCA use open-air bodies of water in their operations. These facilities may be vulnerable to drought. These facilities include but are not limited to Flint Hills Resources LP, Citgo, Elementis Chromium LP, Valero Refining Co, and Koch Carbon Inc. While the ways in which these facilities use water resources varies, what remains constant is the fact that an interruption in water resources would result in negative economic impacts for these facilities. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 7 15 1 If" ,n 1,111911,l iii � o� I�l I i�i iii �i Windstorms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorms Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Windstorms Hazard 19 City of Bishop Windstorms Hazard 21 City of Corpus Christi Windstorms Hazard 23 City of Driscoll Windstorms Hazard 25 City of Petronila Windstorms Hazards 26 City of Port Aransas Windstorms Hazard 29 City of Robstown Windstorms Hazard 31 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorms Hazard 33 Windstorms Hazard Overview Description A windstorm is a storm with high winds or violent gusts with little or no rain. The windstorm hazard excludes extreme wind events that occur with other wind -related natural hazards such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornados which are addressed elsewhere in this plan. Location Windstorms do not have any specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to windstorm activity. According to FEMA Wind Zones in the United States, Nueces County is located in Wind Zone III, associated to winds as high as 200 mph. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 1 1 If" ,n Figure 8-1. FEMA Wind Zones in the United States t 8 ZOU .THE UNITE STAT.' /' IN 00 11100 0000, ,.III I i uuioi 00 00 19401019,101, 1111111 ho opoo EE ESKA or ^io��,wyg ��u4��rM iJ//�J NACKM, WWW �U v d M Srts liWA NrP31160MW 0,661 ZONE ZONE Ef wohp 111 EOi1 ',SIV ONEEi OW zoo NUECES COUNTY poonloolloolovoloolo The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) was established under the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) by the Texas Legislature in 1971 following Hurricane Celia. TWIA provides windstorm and hail insurance along the Texas seacoast. Recommended design and inspection requirements for structures along the coast have been developed by TDI based on historical damages. Three designated catastrophe areas have been defined for Nueces County. Designated catastrophe areas are established for territories subject to unusually frequent and severe damage resulting from windstorm or hailstorms. Designated catastrophe areas for Nueces County include: Seaward, Inland I, and Inland II. Adopted design wind speeds for these designated catastrophe areas are shown in Figure 8-2 and defined below: • Seaward: 130 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland I: 120 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed • Inland II: 110 mph 3 -second gust design wind speed Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 2 1 If" ,n Figure 8-2. TDI Designated Catastrophe Areas Portland Y ■ Corpus Christi 011 Driscoll Chapman Ranch w Extent Bishop Inland II Inland I Port Aransas Seaward Windstorms extent is defined using the Beaufort Wind Scale. Table 8-1 summarizes the Beaufort Wind Scale. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 3 1 P a • 0 1 1\ a Ott \1111\ 1\ 1 Less than 1 1 1-3 2 4-6 Light Breeze 3 7-10 Gentle Breeze 4 11-16 5 17-21 Fresh Breeze 6 22-27 Strong Breeze 7 28-33 Near Gale 8 34-40 Gale Table 8-1. Beaufort Wind Scale "":1)1\\ • Calm Light Air Moderate Breeze 9 41-47 Strong Gale 10 48-55 Storm 11 56-63 Violent Storm 12 64+ Hurricane Source: www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/torna a 1 4k 4k 1P Ott ` im 1�. II �'.`^ t N ��������01����0\�0�1�����`���������������� „�„��,,, ���� ��4��,,,,\,;,,��„��,a„1;,a��1�,,,�,,,,,,�,,,,\a„� �,,a,�,,,a�a,��\\,,,a�,l,;,,a,,,'��„�”,a,\,,,,�,,,,a„�,,,�,,;,��1111111\11����1`���������������������������� 11X0111�010�11y,;,;°;;;;MM°;;°„1�\\I11�1\111�1��1�����\1111X0111�010�11���;°~"�°y;»M�1110111��1��0��� Sea surface smooth and mirror- like Scaly ripples, no foam crests Small wavelets, crests glassy, no breaking Large wavelets, crests begin to break, scattered whitecaps Small waves 1-4 ft. becoming longer, numerous whitecaps Moderate waves 4-8 ft. taking longer form, many whitecaps, some spray Larger waves 8-13 ft., whitecaps common, more spray Sea heaps up, waves 13-19 ft., white foam streaks off breakers Moderately high (18-25 ft.) waves of greater length, edges of crests begin to break into spindrift, foam blown in streaks High waves (23-32 ft.), sea begins to roll, dense streaks of foam, spray may reduce visibility Very high waves (29-41 ft.) with overhanging crests, sea white with densely blown foam, heavy rolling, lowered visibility Exceptionally high (37-52 ft.) waves, foam patches cover sea, visibility more reduced Air filled with foam, waves over 45 ft., sea completely white with driving spray, visibility greatly reduced do/beaufort.html Calm, smoke rises vertically Smoke drift indicates wind direction, still wind vanes Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, vanes begin to move Leaves and small twigs constantly moving, light flags extended Dust, leaves, and loose paper lifted, small tree branches move Small trees in leaf begin to sway Larger tree branches moving, whistling in wires Whole trees moving, resistance felt walking against wind Twigs breaking off trees, generally impedes progress Slight structural damage occurs, slate blows off roofs Seldom experienced on land, trees broken or uprooted, "considerable structural damage” Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 Occurrences Windstorms can occur at any time of year but they are typically more common during the spring and early summer. In Nueces County from 1956 — 2016, 69% of all windstorms took place between the months of March and June. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Storm Prediction Center, Nueces County has experienced 209 (recorded) windstorm events over the course of the record period from 9/26/1956 to 3/19/2016 (60 years). Table 8-2 includes a summary of windstorm events from 1950 to 2006, categorizing the events by wind speed. Table 8-3 includes a comprehensive list of all windstorm events on record within Nueces County. Historical windstorm events are mapped for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 8-2. Historical Windstorm Occurrence Summary, 1956-2016 "rt 209 SSSSSSIIIIEIRMIRBISRISSSII 51 94 18 24 7 10 5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 5 1 P a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20161 Unincorporated Nueces County Robstown 10/4/1956 53 0 0 $0 $0 Robstown 10/4/1956 60 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 4/20/1957 68 0 0 $0 $0 County Robstown 4/27/1957 Unknown 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/1/1957 62 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/1/1962 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/31/1964 65 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 2/6/1967 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/20/1967 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 5/11/1968 61 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 11/29/196 Unknown $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 11/26/196 67 0 0 $0 $0 County 9 Corpus Christi 1/6/1970 50 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 1/9/1970 57 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 6/1/1970 64 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/10/1971 0 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 9/10/1971 60 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/2/1972 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/5/1973 52 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 5/1/1974 Unknown 0 0 $0 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 5/1/1974 52 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 5/26/1974 54 0 0 $0 $0 111111•0t11`111 „litt 9/26/1956 54 0 0 !N,\\‘‘`‘N \\IF\ mat so so 1 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 6 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20162 (cont.) Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Bishop Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi AtA 6/10/1975 50 6/10/1975 56 7/15/1975 Unknown 8/5/1975 54 4/21/1979 Unknown 4/21/1979 Unknown Unknown Unknown 54 70 Unknown 58 80 80 51 4/12/1980 5/19/1980 5/21/1980 5/21/1980 5/22/1980 8/10/1980 8/10/1980 8/10/1980 7/11/1981 10/31/198 1 5/12/1982 5/12/1982 5/12/1982 6/6/1983 10/7/1984 60 Unknown Unknown 51 Unknown Unknown 10/7/1984 Unknown 5/8/1985 Unknown 5/21/1985 52 5/17/1986 Unknown 2 NOAA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 so so so so so "V so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20163 (cont.) Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Port Aransas Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Corpus Christi \\\ \A 8/21/1986 Unknown 0 0 8/21/1986 Unknown 0 0 8/21/1986 Unknown 0 0 8/21/1986 64 0 0 2/27/1987 52 0 0 11/16/1987 52 0 0 4/29/1988 Unknown 0 0 4/29/1988 54 0 0 4/29/1988 Unknown 0 0 6/3/1988 Unknown 0 0 4/29/1989 Unknown 0 0 2/21/1990 50 0 0 3/28/1991 Unknown 0 0 3/28/1991 Unknown 0 0 5/8/1991 Unknown 0 0 5/8/1991 54 0 0 5/8/1991 54 0 0 3/3/1992 Unknown 0 0 3/3/1992 Unknown 0 0 4/17/1992 Unknown 0 0 5/5/1993 50 0 0 5/5/1993 50 0 0 5/10/1993 Unknown 0 0 5/10/1993 Unknown 0 0 9/26/1993 Unknown 0 0 3 NOAA 111111111!kl so so so so so so $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 so so so so so so so so so so so so so $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 so so so so so so $4,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 $o $o $o $o $5,000 8 10", a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20164 (cont.) Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Port Aransas Unincorporated Nueces County Robstown Corpus Christi Port Aransas Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 4/15/1994 4/11/1995 5/30/1995 5/11/1996 9/20/1996 11/24/1996 11/24/1996 11/24/1996 5/9/1997 5/9/1997 6/17/1997 6/17/1997 2/12/1998 6/15/1998 8/14/1998 3/28/1999 5/12/1999 5/12/1999 5/18/1999 5/18/1999 3/14/2000 3/14/2000 3/14/2000 6/7/2001 4NOAA A01 58 58 60 52 60 60 60 70 50 60 60 50 52 65 60 50 50 59 50 60 55 65 68 60 \\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 $5,000 $3,000,000 $30,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so so so so so so so so so so $100,000 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $5,500,000 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $5,500,000 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20165 (cont.) Corpus Christi 9/9/2001 50 Corpus Christi 9/9/2001 50 Corpus Christi 5/17/2002 50 0 Unincorporated Nueces 5/17/2002 50 0 0 County Bishop 5/29/2002 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/29/2002 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/29/2002 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/29/2002 57 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 10/23/2002 59 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 2/15/2003 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 2/15/2003 50 0 0 $0 Corpus Christi 3/26/2003 50 0 0 $0 $0 Port Aransas 9/12/2003 50 0 0 $0 $0 Port Aransas 10/25/2003 60 0 0 $0 $0 Robstown 5/1/2004 52 0 0 $100,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/19/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 3/19/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 5/8/2005 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/8/2005 60 0 0 $0 $0 Robstown 5/29/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 11/15/2005 50 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 3/28/2006 51 0 0 $0 $0 Bishop 5/14/2006 52 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/14/2006 50 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/26/2006 50 0 0 $2,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/26/2006 50 0 0 $2,000 $0 0 0 0 0 0 tAt so so so $0 ittit so so so $0 5 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 10 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20166 (cont.) Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County 6/26/2006 50 6/30/2006 50 6/5/2007 65 tAt ittit 0 0 $3,000 $0 0 0 $45,000 $0 0 0 $40,000 $0 Port Aransas 10/19/2007 54 0 0 $50,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/6/2008 54 0 0 $50,000 $0 Bishop 3/10/2008 52 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/10/2008 58 0 0 $50,000 $0 Corpus Christi 3/10/2008 59 0 0 $50,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 3/18/2008 52 0 0 $5,000 $0 County Corpus Christi 8/28/2009 50 0 0 $10,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 9/10/2009 52 $10,000 $0 County Robstown 9/10/2009 52 $10,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 10/9/2009 56 0 0 $10,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 10/26/2009 61 0 0 $20,000 $0 County Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 56 0 6 $1,000,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 58 0 0 $700,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 70 0 0 $100,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/2/2010 78 0 0 $250,000 $0 Driscoll 6/2/2010 52 0 0 $100,000 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 51 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 60 0 0 $500,000 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 70 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 1/9/2011 78 0 0 $700,000 $0 Driscoll 1/9/2011 52 0 0 $0 $0 6 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 11 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-2016' (cont.) Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Robstown Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County 1/9/2011 8/25/2011 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 9/29/2011 3/20/2012 3/20/2012 3/29/2012 3/29/2012 4/2/2012 5/8/2012 5/8/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012 NOAA AtA 70 78 51 52 52 52 52 50 50 50 61 52 50 52 52 52 52 65 70 70 52 \\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \A 0 0 0 0 111 1 ttiti $500,000 $500,000 $1,000 $5,000 so so so so 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 $30,000 0 $0 $0 0 $50,000 0 $1,000,000 0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 0 $10,000 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 121 If"ai Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20168 (cont.) Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County Unincorporated Nueces County tAt ittit 5/10/2012 52 $0 $0 5/10/2012 70 0 0 $100,000 $100,000 5/10/2012 70 $1,000,000 $100,000 Robstown 5/10/2012 52 0 0 $25,000 $0 Corpus Christi 11/3/2012 53 0 0 $25,000 $0 Corpus Christi 11/3/2012 59 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 11/3/2012 61 0 0 $30,000 $0 Port Aransas 11/3/2012 53 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 6/7/2013 50 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 6/30/2013 50 0 0 $0 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 9/2/2013 50 0 0 $2,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 4/4/2014 52 0 0 $10,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 4/12/2015 50 0 0 $0 $0 County Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 51 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 52 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 54 0 0 $5,000 $0 Corpus Christi 4/14/2015 55 0 0 $500,000 $0 Driscoll 4/14/2015 56 0 0 $10,000 $0 Corpus Christi 4/22/2015 52 0 0 $10,000 $0 Unincorporated Nueces 4/22/2015 61 0 0 $10,000 $0 County Unincorporated Nueces 4/22/2015 61 0 0 $3,000,000 $0 County Corpus Christi 5/12/2015 51 0 0 $0 $0 Corpus Christi 5/12/2015 52 0 0 $100,000 $0 8 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 13 1 If" a Table 8-3. Historical Windstorm Events, 1956-20169 (cont.) 11� 1 1 1F 011111\11� 1 1 \‘. Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Agua Dulce Bishop Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Driscoll Driscoll Unincorporated Nueces County Petronila Robstown Corpus Christi Unincorporated Nueces County 5/12/2015 5/15/2015 5/15/2015 5/15/2015 5/24/2015 7/31/2015 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 �111� 1 1111»1111 1111 ��H���,���il���,„�`�����„�,� 111111” 57 52 51 56 52 50 61 56 59 61 68 61 61 3/18/2016 65 3/18/2016 3/18/2016 3/19/2016 61 52 61 3/19/2016 55 \\I 0 0 \A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \l 111\�WE so $20,000 $100,000 $100,000 $10,000 $30,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $2,000 $4,300,000 $100,000 $60,000 so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so $25,000 $0 $10,000 so so so so so Table 8-4 Nueces County Windstorm -Related Disaster Declarations ruM 111 Whit 1439 1709 4223 11/5/2002 6/29/2007 5/29/2015 9 NOAA 1) 111 11 11 0111 11 l� 10/24/2002 6/16/2007 5/4/2015 1111,10\011 1� 1 11110.1111111 1110 0 X11 � 1 tow. „ An 11/15/2002 8/3/2007 6/23/2015 X10 $57,974,742 $25,706,394 $156,797,067 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 14 1 If” a 0 Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of windstorm events in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. Note, historical events are documented as a function of the path of the storm. A windstorm may travel over several jurisdictions; consequently, the windstorm event is recorded for all jurisdictions through which the windstorm passed. Probability for future windstorm events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Impact Windstorm impacts are documented by the number of deaths, injuries, property damage, and crop damage. Table 8-4 provides a summary of impacts for Nueces County as a whole. Impacts to the county and participating jurisdictions is documented in the following sections. Table 8-5. Historical Windstorm Impacts Summary, 1956-2016 209 0 6 $72,872,000 An".1 ti.NV $410,000 In addition to the direct, historical impacts in Table 8-5, vulnerable assets and potential maximum impacts are listed in the jurisdictional tables. Because the impacts of windstorms are closely tied to the extent of the event and windstorms are expected to be evenly distributed throughout the planning area, maximum impacts are listed in the jurisdictional tables. Fortunately, it is unlikely that a worst case scenario windstorm would ever take place and maximize damages. Windstorms can cause indirect impacts by damaging power lines and other above -ground utilities. Crop losses and population displacement from housing damage could cause additional economic losses. Vulnerability Windstorms often cross -jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in and around Nueces County are exposed to windstorm hazard and are at potential risk of impact. The damage caused by a windstorm is typically a result of high wind velocity and wind-blown debris. Vulnerability of humans and property is difficult to evaluate given that windstorm form at different strengths and in random locations. Property damage is typically most significant for structures of light construction. Three types of structures are more likely to suffer damage: manufactured Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 15 1 P a homes, homes on crawlspaces (more susceptible to lift), and buildings with large spans, such as shopping malls, gymnasiums, and factories. Vulnerability is defined for the county and participating jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 16 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorms Hazard ISSISSI1 MISSS.S\ ISISIZI ISMS.M SIVE211111\alal County Wide (Unincorporated Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 ‘tytt \0001\\\0\00 11111 \0001\\1111 111 \ \\\\ 11 110 0\\\ 11 11 D \\ \ 1 11 VIZ ea`\"� `�1� `��\ 111 45 10 19 2 11,111111 8 3 3 0 slssstEca AMA NIAA tk\t‘ \\a AMM. 45 0 0 $11,335,000 $200,000 IMEEK 1 01 011 01 1\ 0 01 11 1111211 0 �\1 1 00\ 1\1\\1\ 1\1 101 111)111 1111. �10101011�0101101�1�1� ���0\\ ��1�111�h� 10111 ���0�0�11\ 1 011 � , 1, ,�. � \ ,, � .� . ��11���1���1���������1����1`�������,����1���0��������1��������� 9/26/1956 to 75% 45 3/19/2016 60 0 �0110�1011111111111�1��1�1111,11111011\11111 l�\Illl\111�111� 5 \ 1 1 � 1 \ 0 �01��1���1�1��1����1���������������������������������������������������������������,,,,,,,,�,,,��,�`I„��,,,,,�,,,IIIb,,,,�,,,,,,�1�,,�1��„���„��1���1���\��1���1�������������������������������������������������������������������� ,1111 1111 11 1 1111 �„ 111 1 \ 11111111 Q1 011\111111 l) 1 0 \ 1 (9 \ \ 1 IIIIIIIQ111111111��1111111 111 (1111..._. 1 IIII111111�11 \O1\10 � ...., . 111 \ 11 1�\1 �1 � 1 �1 \ 111� 1 1 1 1 1111111 ���.11111 1,. 111 \I 1 \1 � \m 11 11 11 ��������01�����������„I`��„��„�,�,���„�,1���„��1,,,�„���,,,�1,��1�„1111;„������������������������������ ��������01��������������0�����,,,,,�„��„�,�,���„��,,,?;�1,�0„��11,,,1����������`�������������������0�� 11111 1 u 1111�1�11�� . 111 1�1 o a as 1� 11 1�1 0�� 1 00 11� 11 0 1 tui1 \ of 1 100111\00111�1100\01�11.11 0��\\.�\o��o\��.ti1 � 0�1\�\00\00� � Ilulool \\1111\\1 �»\\\\\1 \\ 1 1 X11111 � 10\\ � 1 1 �� 1 1 , \ ��11�11��,�,,,�,,,��„�,,,��„�,,,�`�,,,�,,,�,,,�,�1,,,�����11�11�01�,,,111,,,�,,,��1,�,��1,,,�1„��”��,1��,,,������1��1\��11�11�01����1�„�I,,,�1�1,,�,,,,�����10�1����1\��11�11�01����1���,,,,,,�,�,,,,�1,,,��1�010111��1�1`11 15,274 $373,034,606 $487,429,634 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 345,880.3 $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 8 17 1 If” ,n Figure 8-3. Unincorporated Nueces County Windstorm Events 1111111,11f1,1111,fffIll 0111111111111111 001 ,u It 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .wIYA'i: id�i �r u a iuN °o y 'c t' �'tnl�4u Ilii dulVW V 1 yoyolo11111111000000 y1111111111111111111111111111111loul10o .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000,000000000000000011111111111111111111111111 nommonoWfl M I���I�� VIII'(,0 000 0011000000 0000000000,000) NIVs nomiVItIIVIIIpIII'�I ull1puufl 111111 111111111111,1„1„1 1111 1111111111 lI oll ,111111,1,V,11,,111,,,,11'111'111111,',111 atm Action 6'ari awArcro NlN '.,e$, County uiuw,n�,+MpF ��.dl'�4 a,r 0 0 N,400.00 i0tCdr Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 8 18111 ndrm City of Agua Dulce Windstorms Hazard SSdime\t -'%;r;�d�,e„ maw ttm aml ryas" City Wide o� to0100.11;MI Igo� �of1111111111111000\\ll X11\ 111111,1.111\\\\111�11 1 \\1D ,11���� �� . X111\\I\\1`�"�`��1`�1���`��`����������������������������������\ I�o���a�i1��a�1o���i���`�lo��,� ��,��i�����i���o�i��o�,�"���0�0 t 1 1111���\�1�� 1 111 1� 1 0100 .111011\\� 1\) 1��1�11111���1�1�0 10111�11�111�0� 1 1 0 0 Inland 2 umsssssam 0 0 0 0 AWA.M. %AAA fififi\\ %Attitt% 1 0 0 $20,000 $0 Issassanzass vontammur 1 3/18/2016 66 1.5% 010�0101�10 liiii luu�iuiliiii�i lilt l0�1�11�0100o0a>u�l u� 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ I 0 1 1�1\��0����1����\���1�������������������„,,,,,,,�,,,�„�`�,,,�,,,,,,�„X11,,,1„�1,,,,,,��1,,�,1”�,,,���,,,��101�\1�01���1���10�1���������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �lll 1,11 , , 111„ ,,, .1, 1 �l \ l \ 11\11111 l 11 X111\1111111 1 11 1 1 I \ 111111111111111111111111 11111111,..... \ 11110101101 1101�>11\,...,. 111 ( 11 111 II 1 1 � 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 � � 1m n1111111`�`����1����`���`����111���1��1��1�,�����`��I�����'�1����;,����1��11���'�i�l��”�1�1���1��111���\11�1�1���1�"�������������� n1111111`�`����1����`���`����������II�I�I�I��i111���,����������������,�1����,�`������d1�1���11111��\111\1\11\1������������������� 01 la 0 sl loll 111 0�ua lol ai of la 0 01 0 11 1111 1 11101111111\11\11011110,.1\ 0111.,11111111111U�.001 1 .111\1\0\001 1111111 111111 1 1 1 \ 11� 1 111. \ (\ \ 1 1 �1 1 1\ \ 1 1 0 \\ 1 \ fl� m � � m \\��1�0��1�11���������\\����������\\� ��������Illl�llllll�ll�ll���ill�ll,���ll;���ll�llll�ll�ll„y������� ���������,1111��1111��;�1�1�111,111111;��11���11,1�1�11;11�1�������� ������������\�1,�11111�1,1�1�1���1���������11����� �����������������„111„��11„1�1�1,��\���\t�\�\�������\�� 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 2.45 $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 19 1 If” ,n Figure 8-4. City of Agua Dulce Windstorm Events ISI 11111111111111111111 Il 111l 11' 111111111111111111moo, PAN ,IIII11 111111111111111111111 ��1 ! 1!D111111)111miIIII II II� �L�l'11111111111111111111'''1r 1 I IIII111„1„1„1„11 111111 II ,If�d��j�fl�� 1 Y Fpi�Y�ilI lI1I1!A'1� '11lf SII iiu� �6 4r ����,�1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111I 11l a ��1111II�IIIIV 1�II I� 111,1 ll 1IiniHmau111111",r l ,11111111111 o%JAY / f ,fi;j; / ""y dal i P: J// w C J/ // IJf/l%rfJr"/// 11111111111 Diol Giy� 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 t%,�rrrr�r��rrrl� P ar / IRA ler „ 0110 i1r CA.orff, Ilii iGn4i446'd:(11114 Arp DA* Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 20 1 P a City of Bishop Windstorms Hazard slaw m nassi mtmemr• City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 X11 II 11 ��� 111 000 11 �111� 111 1 1111111 Q � 1 \ \11\11.0\\\0\\�� 110111 111011\0111\� X111 I tilll I111111UI Ill 1\l\ 10 110 Ol\\ \l DO 111. � � � 1 1 1 � , 1 1 11 \ \ �1 t, I j� � 1 � �� ��1�1111111 ��`��1��`��`�`��\���������������\������������������������������o������i�11���1io��a��`�io�,�`1����11ii���������1111��0��111���ii���u�l�oti�l���0�1�»1'i,�`���i� \oUl\lig`���i�11���0,�`1���ia�l,C,��i�\\11\\11�1\\\`1��"1����`���`�\��`�������������\��������� 1.719 MIT Min \VI 8 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 17� �1�1�1�1���1����111�`����������\�����\�������������������������������������������������11»X11»,�„�,,,II��„��`�,,,1,,,,»��„�1�1�1011�10101�1111�1�1�1��\�����������\�����\���������������������������������������� *my% \\I\AA1 Awm. m.\.% mkt 8 0 0 $50,000 $0 ISSISSE 1 1 v 1 � 11 0\ 01 11 11Cletnal1 1111 1\1 11101 111011 111 10111\ 111 1 Illll 11 1 1111 1 \\11 � 1 \1 1.01111110\11111100111. �10\11111�11 �1101�\0\\0 .�\� 111 1011\1.11111111.11�1� � �1 ��111�1� ��\\\0��0\\11 1111 � ����0�\111 \���11� 1 �1�I� I � 1\0 � � �����,1`���1���1�1�1�1�1�����,��1�1�11,�1��1������� �1��\,`��,�1�»�1����������1\�1���11���11�1�11�11� 1�1���������������1����1�� SWEINSI �1���„��������\ 8 7/11/1981 to 3/18/2016 35 SISS21 MISS 22.9% 1\i‘"•""l'''''111111malss ittt 11 EMI 111111M 11111 tall IN MU 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 539.02 $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 21 1 If” a 1111111 11111111111111111 111 1111111111til111111111111 lll:ll�� 11111111 VI VI Figure 8-5. City of Bishop Windstorm Events 1,1111111I1I IIIIIIII Illlll111111iilllll 1))J J)l� �� iiIIIIII�I"lid �I� ""111111111111 effemilkkg 11,111111o)),11111141,11111 u:u 1111111111111111111 111111111111111, 11,01//////kill ; I r(11111«/:«1111;11:1 qr,P Ill1 rr i• uU,Ul ,/NpifIII {{cru/ll�ni uh I ° ,: I�p�flIII11I m l p,rrNpllll!II�IIfpll��i NflVI Ili 111 111111111) NNNJJJJJII 11)1E11 MINI 0 a p III CI t�'rhr 11 II 11)) '�,� p III �I�IIIIII„ III I,!II� )i IlIiIMIlI1�l��� 9)I1�i� Ili 1 IjIIIIII '(tlllll YIIIII �IIIIllI111111III II I �6�11 ���I,I�i IiIlj111111 II li 111.1.1111 I IIIIIII n1 r �I�'I I II 1' SII Ip III Ill) I IIG �1 � y11))1101IQ i6111�1I11�� II 111 1��IIIII, •igiV 11111111111111 , IIlI I11 11111111 , 11/1§g//////,1111,111111100 imu//111 : 11„,mu l' ��I ulllllllllll IIIIIII„ 11111111111111111111 JI 1111111111111111111111111111111111 ;,. IIIIIII ��11111II�II�IIII1IIIIIII I1III�I1�III�11111I I1( � X11 II II .1 1Ullr 1111111/11111 III 111111111111111111111111111,11lM „I,, .1111 111111111 ,liiuuuuuuu0000000li 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11uuu11111.111111 11111'911111111111�i 11111.111111 111111111111,11111111111„11111,111„1, IIIIII 1oI',11, 111 111 I1H1 1111111111111' 11lIIi1i111ii11 11IVGI 11111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111? SII 10 1IpIIII1,111100� VIkV11IIfWI11,V'4' 11414 ”„, rr'Ir'n Ir vm Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 22 1 113 ,n dr m1i City of Corpus Christi Windstorms Hazard SISSMS1 I 1 slaw m nassl 1w zazr\ly au ta\\ City Wide Seaward, Inland 1, and Inland 2 assissminnin lonsassm 111 MA 111 123 29 57 15 10 3 5 4 AIM\ x \PM N Ati tt.%. 123 0 6 $51.447.000 $110,000 assssnmsssss. INER laman mins 1.3111 123 6/1/1957 to 3/19/2016 ISSSSSI 31 NMI SSW 1r 1 111 11111111 SERSI SUSS 59 208.5% 324,074 $7,007,832,685 $10,238,656,508 24632.44 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $6,044,014.65 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 23 1 If" a Figure 8-5. City of Corpus Christi Windstorm Events S l�il+ 11�71111��1y� � dl 111111111111111111111111111 Ill I IIIi6101 pI1II 1 1 .,. 111'11'1'1'1'111'1'11111I 11111111111 e'o1 d1I1p10 41111 VVI g4q0 1IIIII „ Ki P 1 Ilii �s�uo, l+fi,MIti�V�Ij'p1��V�I, S uNo, � ilP 111111111111111111111111111111111111 WN jyIII�IIlIIi IIIII I II h �� dNMM 1 MMMd 1 MM MMIM ;MM �f 5V MME �� I IH0�411111111�I1 ' �1W�OW I iu11 udl 110I��Mi Miura auw„�,.r eq,tl 1 I aummu�mummm�umm�mmu 10 IIII 1111 )1 11111111111 e 111111111111 :11111111111101111111111111 mlVa' '191r. V4u p11PIIVI 111 1111111 rpc',AroKK*1r„ dA(*itar 1,44.finwgw ok �I�W V11adM"a'�W1V�m r b�tl"m6WM 4'W,AiZ4II0 94 11 0) 10:00!Cr r ItIn .4*'@W',°0 x4r CI0,1,!Nri, 0610 Ill, Ill, Ill, Ill, IIII Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 24 1 P ,,n d', m' City of Driscoll Windstorms Hazard SSS\11nt\SSSS\\\\\\\\_ assi "iii IsmEnt • emu tak. City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 MEMs 115 MS 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 PAW X11 \\SR, t. 5 0 0 $270,000 $0 ssssss�����������������; nas:wEssssssssssmall unam trean Inins 5 6/2/2010 to 3/18/2016 6 83.3% \ANAA\ly I�fims�S��S�4��"i� titt ,,,11111111% fir,ME r ISMS SW= 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 464.67 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 25 1 If" a 111111011111111111111111111111111111111 1 III il; p 111111111111011111111111 ilooml000 01010.10. %11I � I 41II1�11111" Figure 8-6. City of Driscoll Windstorm Events fN11i1l11lt1l1 Iii)111IIIIII1111111111 1r111 Err,.1 oY 1 1111 IIIIIIIHrHrIrrIrr pl�l l IS1,rr ! 1u �� III Ilh1I r 1111 ij 11 u00jl1l Xa1'N1l�n� H'111(1011 011 0000 un ' ' II ��.. 0000000010000 000 p��I Ipol111111111111 11IH11111111 1 11'1'1111111 "� IIII mI II I ll�llliiiilIIIII VIII I IIII IIIIII, 1 1111111119111114h 11114 1��11111111111111111 �� �� —v. -v111101111111111111 IIII111111�1111111I, wl rr 111111111H111111'll �)Ilnv1f111111 a ul 111 x111 pp gg 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111ti1�1��111, tl m 11111100 111111111 11 111111111111111111111111111111111 ' ! 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 ' �111uu� 11 11'.1! 14, 0II00 vv 1,000000111111 moom000 IV'Vi1 `,YN IUV1+p to 1 11 11 1 �Ir1' IIII I III I'Iillil1111 1;d'11'i1111mmm111111111111111� 11'1 P1 + "11111111 uuuuuuuuuuluuuu111 ' uuu111 (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII f III IIIIUIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIUIIiulullill�1III111 I,!"' I1�'!,III1��11i,111''11111 II 1111111111111111111111,1,1,11111IIIIIIIII11111111111111111'11111 �u II IIII Iiiiiiiiiii IIII UIIIIIIIIIUIIP VIV11111UIIUIIllll1111111 �,IIIIviluuull111YIY111'"i� I++I .r + 1111 111„ III11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111IIII,II,q' 1. 1P ly)11 1 uuuuu1111111111111111111111111111 1111E uu11111111111111111111I1111 jl1 !4�'9�I 111111 HH 111111111111111111111 11111111111 1'��II'� h� YIY 11111 I 111111111111111111111111 IIIIII1111 H„, IIIIIII J i1�111 iil ' 111111111111111111111111111111111111: @ � X1111111 ^11111111 III v111111,1 1l01lllllll00,�u��el A l IIIII 1. 111 01 �'I 1 11100011IIIIIIp1111p1111U1uun 00 000 0 11111111111111111111111111111111 1 t11111,11111111111111111,111 'II�dB'v111111111,11,11,11,11,111,11,111, II 0 ' 11 1111 1111111111111111111111111 1 Holli Prd'�l �I mvp 111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111 11111 111111111111 1111111111 11111111 A!11191 !1111! 1111111!111I IIII II99IIIIIIIIIIW Ill IIIIIIII1111i11111V1�Y11�'17111 000°1l110°°Illuu IIIIJff1111111i1IIIA 11111111111111111111111111 11100 I 11111111111111111111 IIIIIppoIDII VI 11 J11���r> Illi 1 1111 II 1 ll(dluml I rfi r (9o1VIJ11,1 na 11.(11(iIli llu owllw,, /I1/11„. p..11iHttHHHH4H w .rol srw'14u Yr IHH«'INHHY 01'm Pito) owrotreHo', HiloorrHratH Cw rir,Y'ry: 011115(14( Awur^ ,)11°l, ,1 1 11000.4044 r'wC1 Plus r,., atm, 1I114 1(10 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 26 1 11 ,n d m^ City of Petronila Windstorms Hazards ISSIllnISISS\\\\\‘‘‘‘‘M\\\\\\\_ asst "iii IsmEnt • emu City Wide Inland 1 SISISSWITEMBEIMIERSISSM111 MB VI 111111" 0 0 0 1 Sbiiwii.•,• GJd"3vii.•,• \\SW' %SAW t.Vt� ,,,,,;,rad%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"dam,,,,,, 9�:,s'd»f�,��I����, ,,,sm: 0 0 0 1 0 0 $25,000 $0 11121 11m171 111`1������������������������������������������� Mtn \�1\ � 1101 0011 � letan 101 0� 1 111 0�� 1 1 � 11 1 11 \�� 1III�I�I`II��� �\\��1 1���1 �11111�1� ���11�01� � ���0����� . ��\ ��������������� ������������1�1���1�������������������������������11����1�1���1��111��111�1�1�»�������������� 1 1950-2016* 20* *titiaictitttltlMIISSSS %."11111 lssnnBBnssllasvilminsu tttttVi" 111•1111 111111_ SWIM 1112111 5% 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 926.66 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 27 1 If" a Figure 8-7. City of Petronila Windstorm Events 0101110111100010 'N� 001,111100 �11JIIIIIIIIIIIIII lllllllllllllllllllll+ i 1"il i�1J!!illlllllllllllli 011001,011,111,1000I 0 1 a I11ii`,P+'r"'' 1111111111111100a „„„„ �4I1 II III 111 1 1 mm 0 1'01111111111111'1 I ®1 HJ E 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110101010101101 11111 11111111 10011110101111111111111111111110000,1,10,1111111111,1111111,111111000000 �1' mm1 11111111111111101011111 `lootillmoll�1101101 mIIII IIIIIpI001 0000000000,1011000111110011"""'. IIf IIII 111 1Ilf1,�lIIIII1111111111111IIIIiIIIII; x"II I!1 6„,„ "„"„ 000000 1 11 11111111111111 10111 yuuum ,% in uu�IdW�lra'',i.ui�ur '' 000u011u0l IIII !p ld�'� 1II 111 u.10 111 11111111111 I li 1 1u11 u1R�� II, I111111111111111111111110111I p !9,'11�1�111111114444NIN 1 11 6 III 1111111111111111 III 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I 010100 D.111111111,111 111111000 III 1111 ILII I I � I11I illi I I I a' 11 "10. 111. 111"11111110011 I 11111111111111111111 00 1001 0,06 1 Z'I Mil4I� i4''I,!d0111111 111111111111110101 P m. 4 WIIpN1 0 Ill ti NI III 00011000000011001110 mum 'r 111111111111111111111111111 11111111 1111111111,1.11.11.11.11.1111.11.1111.11.1111.0011111111111 �! � 'h 1 11 �I IPIYI 00000000000�II lllullii0000 11 l 1 IIIIIIIII 1l°II ill lu 1I 1 1 I;�,NI111u11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0000001100000000000000000 1111 0\ I I II fi1i 1 11111111 l' 111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 ' V IIVII 111 11��l �!I��11116 .��GII�111 0U11T1�1 . 11 11 INI I'° 111 11 'IId1 11111111111111111111111Hi s It�l til 11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1011 001110101 11111111 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010111 111111111111111.11111.111111 11 61. 1 11011111111111011111111111111101110101111111111011111000100101101111101111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111110101101010010111 010 II 1 01111 II ill11,11,11,11,11, 14'" ,,rvdw1 wur ik, 0110.14,tImmrd 10011,0001 001,/1,0w01 Kw/ $00000,rom. 001"011100I,,00471. 1, loot i Ia 1111111111SI 111 111111111111 � I 1111111 .11 !be111, ,,m )10,1 41, W" -a, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 28 1 II ,n d m' City of Port Aransas Windstorms Hazard lassuzzt "iiissi -,,m onsi City Wide Seaward and Inland 1 Wit% WA V11%1 il\NA tk% 12 2 5 0 3 1 0 1 ssssssasssss URA\\ N uttu ��e >(je/ ��szvmkt% tutt. 12 0 12 8/5/1975 to 11/3/2012 0 $5,050,000 $0 � ����`���"���������`���`\\�������`���i�`�1�����������a���i���������� ����"�����o��l1i�������������a����"�a��� 37 32.4% ISSIS%BMII\SSS%����������������� IIMM\Ass\vBBRBnlsusslvslltsss zs�s�fi�i�»>���MEIN11111111 MOHifi SIMI 3,955 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 29 1 If" a Figure 8-8. City of Port Aransas Windstorm Events 1 11111111 Pol 1111111111111111111111111111111 �U�r� icy Hwy"i/r rd d�ri V�� rog ryganreio , 6.50 igiwrgrs ir tor, -a0F srui;+;P,M Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 30 1 P ,n City of Robstown Windstorms Hazard SSS\r laSSISS sissiz "iii sturnmval assl 14 City Wide Inland 1 and Inland 2 SISSISMI 121131115 en IS Alt• 3sfififi���S�� 5 6 0 2 10 0 0 0 VA\ Att 1 0 $4,675,000 $100,000 sassaimmassass 11111111 MEM111113 11111111 10 10/4/1956 to 3/18/2016 SMSSSISIIIMIWM e7RSSSSS 60 16.7% 1•11M\ISSIEntrantlantlintliSSI.' itit \ 11111111111 WEEK SWAN 1111 11,576 $151,390,423 $183,445,540 6580.37 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 31 1 If" a Figure 8-9. City of Robstown Windstorm Events ro 111 mum Mninimmommononnonnot Win* n nil inn 9iI1 a 1� ul illlpl)1,1,,nolnilnnnAnn n'n MmoVy n 111110 11 nn • OnmnInn i I 410,11111111111111111111 In iln"""" 101 111111111111111111111111 lyouoml hM� Yeo u n 111111111111 iwf 1um>rww'ao, r"aml4ct,nomr,and nrinonM.: war,,;-"tnC''n moth,' T wAmpimm�w,'C'.OavrQ°,ip. P'�k'wNflp~Ir'q Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 32 1 P wwn d', m' Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorms Hazard \\SSS\111aSSSSS\\\\\\\_ laSSssum "iiissi Ismin • emu tak. Jurisdiction Wide Inland 1 ISSSSSSMEITBIErnnnSSSSSi MEM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ItIn\ IntA Matt k tAt. tt\t% 2 0 0 $1,050,000 $100,000 sst��S��S���nas:mmsssss000000000000000 WWI WEE 1111115 11EINI 2 5/10/2012 5 ISSISSr 1111% N/A Industrial Area *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 40.0% ssuntmassi ssummtlaint Rr"-�°N 111211 +E' I" UMW $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 33 1 If" a Figure 8-10. Port of Corpus Christi Authority Windstorm Events iillli�wi 1111111111111 lool000loh 111111111 4 1111111111111111111111111111111 itmooNuo woo 1.110 0111111111 to yy w.ly'111. uml IOouoiu a uui ul. f 1100111011111111111111111111 IIIIV—V iIIII,I,',11.11!,1,1!.1.1.4w0.p 9;uINimIOINWiViWloil �VW@V "iuuuuluuuollu'IopliVVum IIVV NIIIVIVVIINIVIIIO� NuuwIIWoIIVoml"11 II 1,11,1111111001,1 SII@ 'liry ',w�dv 111:111.10h'001111.1.1.1111.11,1,1„1,01„,,� Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 8 34 1 II , n d o 111.11111111 It II IIII 111 I 11111111111111111111111111 II111111111 ID II flll�(lllf III IIII '11111 11 Extreme Heat Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Extreme Heat Hazard 5 City of Agua Dulce Extreme Heat Hazard 6 City of Bishop Extreme Heat Hazard 7 City of Corpus Christi Extreme Heat Hazard 8 City of Driscoll Extreme Heat Hazard 9 City of Petronila Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Port Aransas Extreme Heat Hazard 10 City of Robstown Extreme Heat Hazard 12 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Extreme Heat Hazard 13 Extreme Heat Hazard Overview Description Extreme heat is the condition whereby temperatures hover ten degrees or more above the average high temperature in a region for an extended period. If extreme heat conditions persist, it may be considered a heat wave. Location Climate and weather are major drivers of extreme heat. The spatial and temporal ranges at which these forces operate are relatively large scale, putting the entire planning area in risk. A phenomenon known as heat islanding may mean that urban areas are at slightly higher risk than nearby rural areas. Man-made surfaces such as concrete and asphalt absorb thermal energy from the sun during the day. During night time, this thermal energy is released. This cyclical process ensures that ambient temperature remains high through the city. The heat islanding effect may cause temperatures to be up to 10 degrees higher in urban areas than in surrounding rural areas. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 1 1 If" ,n Extent Extreme heat is most dangerous in the summer months. Extreme heat is not just a factor of temperature; humidity plays a role as well. An extreme heat event may occur with air temperature as low as 80°F if the relative humidity is over 40%. An 80°F temperature seems low, particularly for Texas in the summer, so people may not be aware of the risk to extreme heat and therefore may not adequately prepared for the effects of extreme heat. Citizens of the planning area, particularly populations vulnerable to extreme heat, should avoid prolonged heat exposure. Table 9-1. NOAA's National Weather Service Heat Index, Temperature (F°) 80 ,s t 88 88 84 87 8 t 85 88 8i 84 88 89 82 84 88 9 t 02 88 89 LH 83 88 9� 84 88 �2 9 84 89 88 8 9 8 ,0100 Uk tihood ofH . sor a rs with Pro on E os owe or tr mous Activity ]I" Ho thor, I Danger NOAA's National Weather Service Heat Index table shows how humidity and temperature interact to endanger people who are engaged in strenuous activity or are exposed to the environment without any protection. It should be noted that these risks exist even if the area is not currently experiencing conditions that qualify as an extreme heat event. The normal high temperatures may be enough to endanger human health. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 2 1 P ,a Table 9-2 — Previous maximum temperatures This is the worst that can be expected in the future. U ,,,,�,,,�,,,���,,,,,��,,,���\�\�\1�\11\101\1�1�\\111��������������SUS op) Unincorporated Nueces County September 2000 Agua Dulce September 2000 Bishop September 2000 Corpus Christi September 2000 Driscoll September 2000 Petronila September 2000 Port Aransas September 2000 Robstown August 1983 Port of Corpus Christi Authority September 2000 Occurrences Extreme heat events typically occur in summer months during periods of high heat and high humidity. According to the NCDC, five extreme heat events took place in Nueces County from 1950 to 2016. All events are recorded at the county level, though comments may reflect noteworthy events at the municipal level. 8/31/2000 Table 9-3. Previous Occurrences „11111111�ti91��titi�mgWum1W1),ii,m'li�i«,y,,,,,,�„�,�il�il�i�lu�mum� I�I Corpus Chr'sti nternational Airport reported a high of 103 degrees, tying the record high temperature for August. 9/1/2000 Corpus Christi reached an all-time high temperature of 109 degrees on 9/5/2000. This date to may be the overall hottest day on record in South Texas. Other jurisdictions in South Texas 9/5/2000 reported all-time highs on the day. For a period of about five hours, temperatures climbed into the low -100s ahead of a cold front. 5/10/2006 8/1/2011 9/8/2015 Temperatures in Nueces County ranged from 100 — 108 degrees. Heat index values were around 110 degrees. The conditions led to the death of a homeless man in Corpus Christi due to dehydration and heat stroke. Temperatures were around 90 degrees with a 100 degree heat index. A four year month old Corpus Christi boy was found dead inside a car after about 40 minutes.' 1http://www. mysanantonio.com/news/local/crime/article/Corpus-Christi-father-indicted-arrested-for- 6948457. p h p Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 3 1 IP ,n The state of Texas is generally very hot in the summer. From 1999 — 2016, 247 heat - related deaths were reported by the NCDC in the state of Texas. Remarkably, forty-seven of the heat -related deaths occurred during the evacuation of hurricane Rita. Probability The five historical heat events reported by NCDC from 1950 to 2016 suggest that the planning area and all participating jurisdictions can expect a 7.5% annual occurrence of extreme heat events. The expected reoccurrence interval of extreme heat events is about 13.2 years. Extreme heat events are expected to take place in summer months based on previous occurrences which were reported in the months of May through September. Impact The risks associated with extreme heat tend to most greatly impact humans. Buildings are not likely to be damaged by extreme heat. The populations most at risk are children, the elderly, those in poor health, and those who spend large portions of their time outside. According to the latest compiled study on heat related deaths by the National Center for Environmental Health, from 1999-2009, the most recent years for which a report of this nature has been compiled, extreme heat exposure led to 7,233 deaths in the United States. The victims of extreme heat tended to be male (69%) and over the age of 65 (39%). The overwhelming majority of deaths (94%) occurred in the summer months of May to September. Extreme heat can impact agricultural industries in the form of crop or livestock losses. Extreme heat may cause economic impacts related to damage crops and grazing lands caused by reduced productivity of workers. Vulnerability Due to the uniformity of extreme heat events across the planning area, jurisdictional variations in vulnerability provide the most informative perspective from which to examine differences in extreme heat within the planning area. Males and those over the age of 65 tend to be the populations most vulnerable to extreme heat hazards. Demographic information regarding these populations follow in the jurisdictional tables. Agricultural assets are also vulnerable to extreme heat. Livestock and crops can be damaged or killed by extreme heat. Information regarding the vulnerability of agricultural assets follows in the jurisdictional tables. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 4 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Extreme Heat Hazard sslassictsssms „,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, County Wide (Unincorporated) ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilArl\A\ \u"Illx\AttAt Att AUM. %Mt 15,274 31,2734.7 7,542 2,501 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 73.77% 1,112 $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 5 1 If” a City of Agua Dulce Extreme Heat Hazard SSSSSSIIMSSSS\S\\\\\ City Wide elr\SS\\re\irerl\\ te•", 820 %\‘" 2.45 387 108 `1 1, 11 111 I o 110\ �t��������� ������������� ���� ��'�iit 1.12% 47 AIW \\\ %AAA $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 9 6 1 If" a City of Bishop Extreme Heat Hazard SSSSSS\IMSS\SSS „,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,City Wide\ ‘11\1\ TIR ” 3,150 Arl\r\l‘ 539.02 1,597 693 35.57% 241 \I\ tt% $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 7 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Extreme Heat Hazard sslassictsssms City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilArl\A\ \u"Illx\AttAt Att AUM. %Mt 3 24, 074 24,632.44 159,120 40,509 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 7.64% 17,503 $6,044,014.65 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 8 1 If" a City of Driscoll Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtssssssssmll\ City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilAr 1\A\ \u"Illx\tg Att AUM. %Mt 752 464.67 340 136 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 62.4% 57 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 9 1 If" a City of Petronila Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtssssssssmll\ City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilArl\A\ \u"Illx\AttAt Att AUM. %Mt 114 926.66 68 19 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 79.36% 15 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 10 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtsssss City Wide ISISSSIIM!!SSSS%IM 11\AWA At% vilAr 1\A\ \u"Illx\tg Att AUM. %Mt 3,955 0 1,776 910 `1 1, 1 1 11 111 I 1� o \\1111111111\11����������11�\1���11��1�1\\1\������\11\\������ 11\\����������\���1������1 0% 373 $0.00 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 11 1 If" a City of Robstown Extreme Heat Hazard sssssssrrtsssss „,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, City Wide SSSSSIIMIIISS%%% yell \ \Ill:0 11,576 6580.37 5,649 1,505 `1 1, 11 111 IIt\o����������������������� 66.32% 469 At \\. %\t% $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 12 1 If” a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Extreme Heat Hazard sssssstcn\ssss Jurisdiction Wide N/A "VIA \MAI \ 0 N/A 1.‘" .,AANA111 1111\T IAtt 0% Vat\ N/A u As It\AA N/A \%\tV. $o The Port of Corpus Christi Authority lacks vulnerable agricultural area or resident populations. However, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority is major regional employer, directly employing 13,770 people. Many of the employment positions expose employees to environmental heat hazards. Additionally, facilities within the Port of Corpus Christi Authority make use of air conditioning equipment. During times of extreme heat, these facilities may put additional burden on air conditioning equipment. Should the air conditioning fail, these facilities may become hazardous and may expose employees to injurious or fatal heat. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 9 13 1 If" a If1111� l IIIIIIIII� 11111lllllllllllll�l� I 11111 Lightning Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Lightning Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Lightning Hazard 7 City of Bishop Lightning Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Lightning Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Lightning Hazard 10 City of Petronila Lightning Hazard 11 City of Port Aransas Lightning Hazard 12 City of Robstown Lightning Hazard 13 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Lightning Hazard 14 Lightning Hazard Overview Description Lightning is a sudden electrostatic discharge during an electrical storm between electrically charged regions of a cloud, between that cloud and another cloud, or between a cloud and the ground. Location Worldwide, there is predictable spatial variation in the frequency of lightning strikes. However, when examining lighting activity at smaller scales, such as the county or community level, the distribution of lightning events is evenly distributed. Lightning does not have any specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to lightning activity. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 1 1 If" ,n Figure 10-1. Cloud -to -Ground Lightning Incidence in the Continental U.S. (1997-2010) c z z o C, [•E F. M" .[2 01 5•1 431 '5 Pl Y"' ti] 6.6 i3 W4 u ie 1.1 M1 W ELS 411 V4 Li! 1:1 NP P1 cv r6 0111111,1111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 2 1 If" ,n ISI Extent Lightning extents can be described in terms of the frequency of lightning strikes within a time frame. Lightning Activity Levels (LAL) is one of the metrics used to describe lightning extent. Table 10-1. Lightning Activity Levels (LAL) 1 No thunderstorms 2 1 1111M\IY, ANIttAtt \ Cumulus clouds are common but only a few reach the towering cumulus stage. A single thunderstorm must be confirmed in the observation area. The clouds produce mainly virga, but light train will occasionally reach the ground. Lightning is very infrequent. 1-8 Towering cumulus covers less than two-tenths of the sky. Thunderstorms are few, 3 but two to three must occur within the observation are. Light to moderate rain will 9-15 reach the ground, and lightning is infrequent. Towering cumulus covers two to three -tenths of the sky. Thunderstorms are 4 scattered and more than three must occur within the observation area. Moderate 16-25 rain is common and lightning is frequent. Towering cumulus and thunderstorms are numerous. They cover more than three - 5 tenths and occasionally obscure the sky. Rain is moderate to heavy and lightning is >25 frequent and intense. 6 Similar to LAL 3 except thunderstorms are dry. All participating jurisdictions are vulnerable to LAL5. The worst lightning extent the planning area and all participating jurisdictions can expect to experience is LAL5. Occurrence NCDC records from 1950 — 2016 show four records of lightning strikes within the planning area. Corpus Christi recorded three events and Port Aransas recorded one event. None of these events recorded any property damage. Unfortunately, the Port Aransas event resulted in the death of a 63 -year-old beach goer. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority website history section recalls a lightning strike on a grain elevator damaging property and killing a night watchman. No estimates for damage 1 From http://www.prh.noaa.gov/hnl/pages/LAL.php Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 3 1 P ,n were provided. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority's website history section covers a date range of 1920 — 2016. Texas A&M Forest service records show that from 2005 — 2015, one lightning -started fire took place in Nueces County and one lightning -started fire took place in Corpus Christi. Lightning occurrences are discussed in greater detail in the jurisdictional tables. Probability The probability of a lightning strike is calculated by dividing the number of events by the number of years for which records exist. For jurisdictions without records, a probability of 1% will be applied. Because lightning is assumed to take place uniformly within the planning area and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority experienced one event in 96 years, it is assumed that the probability of a lightning strike is similar for other jurisdictions in the planning area. Impact Each individual lightning strike has a very small spatial extent. Only the facilities hit by lightning are expected to be damaged. Facility shutdowns are expected to be less than 24 hours. Deaths are possible, but rare. In the 96 years of history provided by the Port of Corpus Christi Authority and the 66 records from NCDC, only two lightning deaths were recorded. Injuries to lightning are also rare. One of the lightning strikes in Corpus Christi in NCDC records was a lightning strike on an occupied truck. The person inside the vehicle was not killed or injured. Another one of the NDCD in Corpus Christi involved three people who were nearly struck by lightning while playing golf. The record indicates that even though they were very close to the lightning strike, "[injuries] were very minor." The downstream impacts of a lightning strike have the potential to be damaging. Lightning strikes have the potential to spark wildfires, cause explosions or fires if they hit combustible materials, or damage power infrastructure. Lightning impacts are provided for each jurisdiction as a function of the potential future losses including commercial property value and agricultural value. Commercial property value for each jurisdiction was compiled from the Nueces County Appraisal Role. Agricultural value for each jurisdiction is a function of the total agricultural lands shown in the National Land Cover Database divided by the total agricultural land for the county and multiplied by the total agricultural value for Nueces County from the 2012 Agricultural Census. Vulnerability The vulnerabilities to lightning come in the form of assets that may be damaged by a strike or in the form of agricultural land that would be vulnerable to lightning -started wildfires. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority may be a particularly vulnerable jurisdiction. Much of the equipment and facilities within the jurisdiction are quite tall and made of metal. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 41Page These assets may be the fastest way for lightning to discharge. Communities with higher concentrations of commercial buildings may be more vulnerable to lightning strikes. Commercial buildings are often taller than residential buildings, particularly single family residential buildings, and may be at greater risk of lightning strikes. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 5 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Lightning Hazard IIISSSS\IIS\\rllrtllalWSNS\\ 08/30/2/00019/2-0106ac-reWfiarseecac:ii is teadikb3Vgl-alltenricn):,1r!eGarre;[47\11:fyinAerreya Drive MEM Enlir 2 ** No reported deaths, injuries, or damage. 0 death, 0 injury** $0** lsstssat„mnssssl sammem,rammal assummanasss 10% annual chance 1 lightning event every 10 years Sninaltratr 211%ISSISMEE $373,034,606 $76,735,126 ssstss\mtntnssss,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7836 312,734.7 73.77% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 6 1 If” ,n City of Agua Dulce Lightning Hazard ssssstrctntunsstss No NCDC Records ttsssssmtmass s, : wurrimscarai 0 0 death, 0 injury so tnnrnssss\ istormultranal istanzurtnals. 1% Annual Chance* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area 1 lightning event every year* Sninaltratr 211% IS $17,541,361 $602 lssssssztmr ss\ss 11•1111111211121111111111•11 221 2.45 1.12% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 7 1 If" a City of Bishop Lightning Hazard ssssssmmcrmtntcnssss No NCDC Records ssssstnnts imam lumirvinx sunall 0 0 death, 0 injury $0 sssssmzmsss Isironnarm sslutmmmmsss 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area SnInalratr 211% SI $115,889,915 $539 ISSSSSMIZMSSSS 111•1111111211•11111111111•11 466 539.02 35.57% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 8 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Lightning Hazard sssssslltIPP;n,\\s\s\ 06/26/2006 — Foundation company truck on McBride Ln 10/5/2008 — 1 acre fired caused by lightning, near Access Road 4 ISSSSSSMIZZMSSSS WINEESISESEVIRISCarall 3 0 death, 3 injury $0** ISISSSSMZIESSS%%% tatttEttrElnIIS\11SSV1MlrrrnSS 6.1% Annual Chance however, no cost estimate of damage was reported. 1 lightning event every 16.5 years ISSInalltr 211% SISSMIEEMSSI $7,148,763,878 $6,044,014 11,12111118,464 24,632.44 7.64% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 9 1 If" a City of Driscoll Lightning Hazard \\sssssrtmz\ztnssss No NCDC Records sssssrinmtssss imam lumirvinx sunall 0 0 death, 0 injury $0 sssssmzmsss Isironnarmsalummtrass 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area € SInar 211% SI $25,502,273 $114,014 ISSISSIMEMASSIS 272 464.67 62.4% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 10 1 Ii" a City of Petronila Lightning Hazard \\sssssrtmz\ztnssss No NCDC Records sssssrinmtssss imam lumirvinx sunall 0 0 death, 0 injury $0 sssssmzmsss Isironnarmsalummtrass 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area € SInar 211% SI $3,714,796 $227,373 SSSSS.MtntnSSSS 114 926.66 79.36% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 11 1 Ii" a City of Port Aransas Lightning Hazard \ssssssrmx\ztnsxsss 03/15/2009 - Mustang Island Beach stssssttmssss s, : sr"Enrrinx sturnau 1 1 death, 0 injury so slsssssammemultrammassummtnass. 1% Annual Chance 1 lightning event every year SISS%%%%MSSS ISSInalratr 211% SISSMEMMIS1 $413,772,710 $0 slass.saccsssss„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\)) 6,539 0 0% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 12 1 If” a City of Robstown Lightning Hazard \ssssssrmx\ztnsxsss No NCDC Records ISSISSEMESSISS , ENSTIMEIMSCITISI 0 0 death, 0 injury so sammemultranallastentrmassa . 1% Annual Chance* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area 1 lightning event every year* SSS%%%%ZMMIIIMMISISS $151,390,423 $1,614,612 SISSS.S\\\M\IIMMEIMMMISISS 2118 6580.37 66.32% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 13 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Lightning Hazard ssssssx\m\\tnztrztnssss,,`';"''R,�,,,,,,,,,nam,�,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 7/27/1968 — Grain elevator SSSSSSIMISS% EIN SE 117 I AI rW 1 *2012 Dollars — from CHAMPS report 1 death, 0 injury SIZIMME s3,z8�,z5o� lssssstnnrnssss\ satent istanzurtnals 1% Annual Chance* 1 lightning event every year* *Based upon minimum probability of the planning area ISSInalratr 211% IS $174,026,681 $0 ISSISSMIZE SSS\S 288 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 10 14 1 If” a JL2 11 1111 I ''',H11111111111111 1,,,111111'111117PU1711,1,171'171717171' 111111111111,1 111111111111, 111119” '9111'1111111 1I111 I:1 n L 111 111,11'1'1'1'1'1'1'.111111111111111111111111111 mm 11111111111111 11111111111111111111111111 mm, 111111111111111 Coastal Erosion Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Coastal Erosion Hazard 17 City of Agua Dulce Coastal Erosion Hazard 19 City of Bishop Coastal Erosion Hazard 20 City of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 21 City of Driscoll Coastal Erosion Hazard 23 City of Petronila Coastal Erosion Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Coastal Erosion Hazard 25 City of Robstown Coastal Erosion Hazard 27 Port of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard 28 Coastal Erosion Hazard Overview Description Coastal erosion is the "loss of land, marshes, wetlands, beaches, or other coastal features within the coastal zone because of the actions of wind, waves, tides, storm surges, subsidence, or other forces"1. Coastal erosion may result in the temporary redistribution of coastal sediments, or the long-term loss of coastal sediments and sediment accumulation. 1 Texas Natural Resources Code, Section 33.601 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 1 1 If" ,n The United States Geologic Survey (USGS) has identified eleven primary natural process and human activities that cause coastal land loss; these are summarized in Table 11-1. These primary causes for coastal land loss can impact the coast concurrently resulting in sever rates of erosion. Figure 11-1 illustrates how this processes jointly impact the coast. Table 11-1. USGS Primary Causes of Coastal Land Loss2 Po Awry %i/!�%////%/////i ja ///oia/////i%% iip/i///iii lEhnii %l/ Illi Amar°a '�'� //�-0�'u} �1141NN r,r � ,u� d �/ '7l'ftlf� +rlil�/l6»II�ID f�///���r �����1(1 % ,� o as ,J a r�aa� 0, �l(/%Ifllfl!'I/9G17I/pp�// %/off%/iii, I % / 1p %ri//O/%/�%!%�i/ // „e,,,,/ �,��f /; ?Vr d;rv;r jig (� 4lil)I IiII v ry J •,7`1x1 l d d T.. 1 Y i �i >( f I � 1 �77,„,,,,,K, / 1114Yr 1U1,1I 'n!' % /�tR, �ro,l tim tllcVW �iaarrl/ ��/%/ o % �Yr� ry , v e � Il�lff yl /19' 2104 11 rNNr�/ r ly / JOY !/i ie/ Afro vvr 9Jb f ,1:,..111b61,11i1M1 1.11 10 ,.04 err *16 414 1111111, 110,0 rti elf 2 Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-337/landloss.pdf Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 21IF' g Figure 11-1. USGS Interacting Factors That Influence Coastal Land Loss3 SOURCES strett rtarcEssnrtt, sitar t4orltt etnoni= rrnrsi'afptes tx,aur^.nrp:rsrr"M;. c ,wu(6441 rears t.t,"t;OS &frorurtttretort storm washout" bid& Wets t rrr4 tat stow:twos thfrrtra;urt truruttrauut owrroaarce extraction aa9PWMfko„., a1;b,Yria4 kpotranspoik preettritaaau0P4 • ave h torrrima't'tr torso ri oto a ormolu truest* dutsttasou AS it oattu t , gr,ad,,,g rrr„ PROCESSESI uncttuuxa / taws Mod stttnrt9, ttttdr rr ur tl moo.. r a0a rraua mu oroomo tion al ^nr hoilf,,mc rrer, SOU (WOO atttW140 rmon G tnh mins Location Nueces County is one of five counties located in Texas' Coastal Region IV as shown in Figure 11-2. The Texas General Land Office defines five regions of the Texas coast in their Texas Coastwide Erosion Response PIan4. Coastal erosion in Nueces County impacts the gulf -facing shoreline, Laguna, bays, islands, navigable waterways, channels, harbors, and marinas. The primary impact along the gulf -facing shoreline is erosion which then contributes to deposition within adjacent waterways and channels as sediment is redistributed by wave and tidal currents. 3 Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-337/landloss.pdf 4 http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal-management/forms/files/coastwide-erosion-response-plan.pdf Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 3 1 Ifn ,n g Figure 11-2. Coastal Region IV — Critical Erosion Areas5 4 01, 11 is 111* u IIII°t IIII'""" :� liii lulu S h lure; IIII l00 ul ; Nueces County has 20.6 miles of gulf -facing shoreline consisting primarily of low - elevation sandy beaches and dunes along the narrow barrier islands of Mustang Island and the northern end of Padre Island.6 II uu lull. W 111B. s W ;an , 1111s0han , s Behind the barrier islands are 407 miles of additional shorelines along the four bays (Corpus Christi Bay, Nueces Bay, Oso Bay, and Redfish Bay), port facilities, marinas, Upper Laguna Madre, Ward Island, Harbor Island and numerous other large and small islands, including wetlands, estuaries, and the mouth of the Nueces River.? 5 Source: http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal-management/forms/files/coastwide-erosion-response-plan.pdf 6 Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 7 Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 41Page v1111 ; IItIIII Waterways an Chan lne1110s The major navigable waterways within Nueces County are the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, La Quinta Channel, Encinal Channel, Rincon Canal, Aransas Channel, Lydia Ann Channel, Packery Channel, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW). Some of these waterways are illustrated in Figure 11-3. Figure 11-3. Nueces County Navigable Waters8 Lwt Quintal m IR A OGS `~',',u mr 'r, S , IPµ .'"R itrai snot torm rant Pass ar KLEBERG R1513 The Port of Corpus Christi is the eight largest port in the United States in total tonnage9 and has 143.5 nautical miles of ship channel. A breakdown of the ship channel extent in nautical miles is shown in Table 11-2. 8 Source: https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hcn05 9 U.S. Port Ranking By Cargo Volume, American Association of Port Authorities, October 9, 2015. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 5 1 If" ,n Table 11-2. Port of Corpus Christi — Ship Channel Distance10 m UUlfffffffffffffff 79 97I l III I II 11,' .11,1 jjjj p�iVlJ, ,ri i i;'f9 P ll'��( IIMIllllllll���������Ml��llf�l�ll�llll�� . l�(((((((( �(((��llID11111111aY(ia i0,1) Yi i°,,, � v 11'41 1,4 /ill/11 1I 11110lPl r There are numerous named and unnamed small watercraft canal and channel systems located, primarily, along the backside of the barrier islands. A sampling of the named channels include: Mustang Beach Channel, Water Exchange Channel (aka, Fish Pass), Humble Channel, Sinclair Cut, Morris & Cummings Cut, Wilsons Cut, and Atlantic. Unnamed channels include public and private canals for residential and commercial access and development. Onarb hili 111 Marinas Also located within Nueces County are various harbors and marinas that are also affected by coastal erosion. A sampling of the major harbors and marinas include: Conn Brown Harbor, Port Ingleside, Viola Turning Basin, Dennis Dryer Municipal Harbor, Island Moorings Marina, and Corpus Christi Marina. The Texas Coastwide Erosion Response Plan (updated 2013) identifies the most recent critical erosion areas for the Nueces County Gulf shoreline. Critical coastal erosion areas are coastal eroding areas that the Land Commissioner "finds to be a threat to: public health, safety, or welfare; public beach use or access; general recreation; traffic safety; public property or infrastructure; private commercial or residential property; fish or wildlife habitat; or an area of regional or national importance."11 1° Source: http://portofcc.com/wp-content/uploads/Rodman-Bay-Map.pdf 11 The Texas Administrative Code, §§15.1-15.10, and Texas Natural Resources Code, Subchapter H, Sec. 33.601 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 6 1 If" ,n Figure 11-4, an excerpt from the Texas Coastwide Response Plan, illustrates the changing rate of the Gulf Coast shoreline. Mustang Island, north of the Packery Channel, is one of the areas along the Texas Gulf Coast undergoing the greatest rates of erosion at more than -8 foot/year. Figure 11-4. Gulf Coast Shoreline Change Rate dIId Padre Wand 1a1n nrda, I1 en nsuda G of Mex'c Stat stiles 2000 2012 f ;11'4 verc'ee Ran !' -38,9 +36,4 ' ey." 3% Advance 0718 Dire -r1 Net - halye e,11171 r yr' Chae te...... 1',yr... rnFyr. 114 14,8 0 - S d °11 0 2. 4. 82 °;: 11.18 y 1 -4,9 0 05 1,5 -1.1 (- 0,5 10 1 - „...:. . —36 60 120 n1 40 BOA mill The shorelines along Nueces County's bays experience similar rates of erosion. For example, North Beach in Corpus Christi Bay has a history of beach erosion requiring periodic restoration with the most recent occurring in 2001, 2003, and 2016.12 12 Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 7 1 I1" ,n y Occurrences Coastal erosion is sporadic and episodic, occurring over short and long-term periods and at different rates along the coast line. Coastal erosion is most apparent over a short period due to sporadic and accelerated rates of erosion due to extreme weather events such as hurricanes and other major storm events. Long-term erosion is less apparent due to slower rates of erosion due to seasonal changes such as El Nino, rising sea levels, and other long-term human activities and natural processes such as climate changes. SItoh lur°t ""for m The most significant cause of short-term coastal erosion is the effect of tropical storms and hurricanes. Storms and hurricanes that enter the Gulf of Mexico cause coastal erosion within Nueces County regardless of the location that the storm makes landfall. Tropical storms and hurricanes within the Gulf cause increased winds and tidal forces that can extend hundreds of miles from the center of the storm. Figure 11-5. Number of Tropical Cyclones per 100 Years (NOAA) 0 0 ' n; v . 111001111111 1111111111(1 11111111111111111111111 000000000000000100000111111111111101 11111 Hatr'r and r ;pica( Stort s an s NOAA The latest Texas Coastwide Erosion Response Plan (updated 2013) also addressed short-term coastal erosion indicating that for the period of time from 2000 to 2012 the coastal erosion rate for the Gulf shoreline along Nueces County varied from more than - 8 foot/year of erosion to more than +8 foot/year of accretion (Figure 11-5). A comparison of the coastal erosion rates based on 2010 Texas GLO data indicates that 6 miles of the 20.6 miles of Nueces County's Gulf -facing shoreline is classified as critical erosion (i.e., greater than -2 feet/year). This accounts for 2.5% of the State total, or 29.1 % of Nueces County's total Gulf -facing shoreline as summarized in Table 11-3. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 81Page Aransas Table 11-3. Critical Erosion for Nueces County Gulf Coastline13 1figi ff Ii IIfPIIIII�n... 25,721 0.4% •l i 0 Y I IIIII IIIhII p �r rr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiilllllliiiilllllliiiilllllliiiill 1111110 19.0 mi. 5.2% 356 mi. 10.6% f+111!ggE !fffig ,140 5,4 16 mi. 6.8% 84.2% -2 to -7 ft/yr Nueces 361,350 5.4% 90.6% 20.6 mi. 5.6% 407 mi. 12.2% 6 mi. 2.5% 29.1% -2 to -6 ft/yr Kleberg 31,690 0.5% 21.8 mi. 5.9% 222 mi. 6.6% 2 mi. 0.8% 9.2% -2 to -6 ft/yr Aransas, Nueces & Kleberg Combined 418,761 6.2% 61.4 mi. 16.7% 985 mi. [ 29.4% 24 mi. 10.1% 39.1% -2 to -7 ft/yr TOTAL ALL COASTAL COUNTIES 6,750,128 367.0 mi. 3345 mi. 237 mi. 64.6% -2 to -50 ft/y The bay shorelines also experienced similar short-term erosion. For example, North Beach located in Corpus Christi Bay had an average erosion rate of -2.6 foot/year along the entire beach with a high of -6 foot/year at the southern end14. The most recent surveys between 2007 and 2012 indicate that approximately 61 % of North Beach in Corpus Christi Bay is eroding, 18% is in transition, and 21% is accreting (see Figure 11-6). 13 Texas GLO, 2010 14 Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, 2012 (Latest Data) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 11 91Page 01111111111111111111 Figure 11-6. North Beach Erosion Rates 2007 to 201215 q !,rtl.6,r'Xi .., A! pmurn t r Total t egend 26 Sep 2007 02 May 2009 20 Jun 2012 e 15 Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi, 2012 (Latest Data) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 10 1 IIS ,n d', m' I1form Long-term Gulf -facing shoreline erosion rate for the beaches of Nueces County have had the lowest average rate of all coastal counties for the last 70 years at -0.92 feet/year16 An analysis of the Gulf -facing shoreline erosion rates also indicates that 96.7%, or approximately 19.9 miles, of the Gulf -facing shoreline within Nueces County is eroding compared to the State average of 64%, but that the mean erosion rate for Nueces County was -1.7 feet/year which was about a third of the State mean of -5.9 feet/year. These values are summarized in Table 11-4. Table 11-4. Gulf Shoreline Erosion Rate for Nueces County and Texas Nueces County II� � ��� II►►►►►►►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII►►►►►►►►►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iflf II l Illili Mustang Island ( CL** 16.2 mi. North Padre Island (ICL & OCL**) 4.4 mi. -0.4 96.7% lofr!TO!' ?fa IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII vv d iii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'vn���'�i �� �� ����� ;°y 15.7 mi. 20.6 mi. 19.9 mi. -2.6 96.7% 4.3 mi. -4.4 -0.4 4.5 1.7 -4.6 -3.0 Texas Shoreline (18505 to 2000) 367.0 mi. -2.3 64% 234.9 mi. -30.2 -5.9 * source: Joint Erosion Response Plan for Nueces County and the City of Corpus Christi published in 2012 (http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal- management/forms/files/nueces.pdf) **ICL = inside Corpus Christi City Limits. OCL = outside Corpus Christi City Limits. Data based on BEG 2007 erosion rates. OCL includes the City of Corpus Christi's Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) on North Padre Island that extend into Kleberg County. ***Excludes ETJ outside of Nueces County. Coastal erosion also results in sediment accretion into natural and manmade waterways. One example of this can be seen in 2017 aerial imagery of Fish Pass on Mustang Island which is completely blocked from sediment accretion between State Hwy 361 and the jetties at the Gulf -facing shoreline (see Figure 11-7). 16 Bureau of Economic Geology, 2007 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 11 1 Page Figure 11-7. Sediment Accretion of Fish Pass on Mustang Island (Google 2017) iillliiiiip!"'Y' Probability Coastal erosion is a continual process with erosion rates that vary over time. As stated above, the most significant cause of short-term coastal erosion is the effect of tropical storms and hurricanes. The annual probability of the occurrence of tropical storms and hurricane for the county and each participating jurisdiction is summarized in Section 5 of this plan. However, because any tropical storm or hurricane that enters the Gulf has an impact on coastal erosion for the entirety of the Gulf Coast the more representative probability for reoccurrence is summarized in the CEPRA 2015 report which indicates that three hurricanes impact the Texas Gulf Coast every four years. The Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin measured coastal shoreline erosion as a historical shoreline change rate based on averages over a 90 -year period. The results of this assessment indicate that 96.7% of Nueces County's Gulf - facing shoreline is experiencing a mean erosion rate of -1.7 feet/year. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 12 1 IIS ,n d' e Impact Coastal erosion results in the loss of agricultural, industrial, maritime shipping, commercial and recreational boating, residential land, public parks, wetlands and critical infrastructure. These impacts are experienced directly by the jurisdictions that border the Gulf; the coastal jurisdiction which include: unincorporated Nueces County, the City of Corpus Christi, the City of Port Aransas and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. Impacts on the remaining jurisdictions are indirect. The Texas GLO's Texas Coastal Resiliency Master Plan, dated March 2017, includes the following statement concerning impacts by coastal erosion, "if left unaddressed, will continue to have adverse impacts on infrastructure, natural resources, economic activities, and the health and safety of residents." A healthy beach and dune system can reduce damage to property and critical infrastructure by absorbing some of the energy from storm surges and waves. Beach and dune restoration projects to repair damage caused by coastal erosion are a continual economic burden for the coastal jurisdictions. Additionally, loss of coastal property and beaches may reduce property values and reduce tourism along the coast. Navigable waterways and small watercraft canal and channel systems, including the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), are impacted by sediment accretion. Dredging of major and minor channels to remove excess sediment to restore access for commercial and private ships is a constant economic strain on the coastal jurisdictions. Coastal erosion and accretion has a notable impact on the ports, coastal petrochemical facilities, road infrastructure, and commercial businesses. The inland jurisdictions, those that do not border the Gulf, may not be impacted directly by coastal erosion but they do experience indirect impacts. Indirect impacts include the economic impact of addressing coastal erosion issues. These costs are redistributed to the community through higher taxes, and increased cost of goods and services. Additionally, inland jurisdictions may rely on the coast for the opportunity of participating in and benefiting from the tourist industry which is directly impacted by the health of the beaches and dune systems. An example of the costs associated to the maintenance and restoration effort needed for addressing coastal erosion is shown as Table 11-5. This is the latest list of coastal restoration projects identified by the Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act (CEPRA). Of these nine projects, two have yet to be approved for funding. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 13 1Page Figure 11-8. Recent Nueces County CEPRA Funded Coastal Erosion Projects 1111 1 impoppmsmionntonnorK),Eem loolliniiiiinnumlontruismonn Mustang & NPI Beach Maintenance Impacts & Best Practices $ 100,000 ismorponmi na 3,111421„iio;rfulpoipur 8 2014-2015 1 Nis I n 2 Nueces River Delta Stabilization & Habitat Protection $ 322,500 na 3 McGee Beach Nourishment $ 269,000 na 4 Shamrock Island Habitat Protection & Enhancement Phase 2 na $ 1,856,800 5 Cole Park Shoreline Protection na $ 2,000,000 6 Indian Point Shoreline Stabilzation & Habitat Protection $ 750,000 na 7 2012-2013 7 Nueces Bay Portland Causway March Restoration $ 2,914,000 na 8 Nueces River Delta Stabilization & Habitat Protection $ 187,500 na 9 Corpus Christi Beach Nourishment $ 2,340,000 na Tota I $ 6,883,000 $ 3,856,800 $ 10,739,800 Source: CEPRA 2015 report (http://www.glo.texas gov/coast/coastal-management/forms/files/CEPRA-Report-2015.pdf) Vulnerability Private and public lands, infrastructure, and industry along the coast are directly vulnerable to the impacts of coastal erosion. The navigable waterways and small watercraft canal and channel systems, including the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), are directly vulnerable to the impacts of coastal erosion and accretion. The Texas GLO's Coastal Resiliency Master Plan identified key issues and proposed solutions to address Nueces County's vulnerability to coastal erosion. The resultant list of projects with associated costs are summarized in Table 11-6 and are shown in Figure 11-8. A prominent vulnerable asset within Nueces County is the Corpus Christi Ship Channel Entrance and Jetty Channel. The US Army Corps of Engineers recommended a FY2013 budget of $4.9M to dredge these areas to remove sedimentation to maintain the channel depth, and recommended an additional $3.2M to repair levees adjacent to Nueces Bay that were eroded by a storm event and wave action. Specific vulnerable assets are identified for each of the coastal jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 14 1Page Table 11-5. Strategies & Projects to Address Nueces County Coastal Vulnerabilities17 R3-3 R3-4 R3-5 R3-10 R3-12 R3-14 R3-15 ls1111,Ill%s\\ Mustang Island State Park Acquisition Indian Point Shoreline Protection Coastal Bend Gulf Barrier Island Conservation Portland Living Shoreline Dagger Island Living Shoreline Flour Bluff Living Shoreline R3-11 Nueces County Hydrologic Restoration Study R3-9 Corpus Christi & Nueces Bays Oyster Reef Restoration R3-6 Shamrock Island Restoration - Phase 2 R3-16 Causeway Island Rookery Habitat Protection 17 Texas GLO's Coastal Resiliency Master Plan, March 2017 171111 $3M - $8M $3M - $10M $0.5M - $2M $0.5M - $1.5M $1M - $3.5M $1M - $2.5M $1.5M - $4.5M $0.5M - $2.5M Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 $1M - $10M $6M - $18M $0.5M - $2M 151Pa Figure 11-9. Map of Projects to Address Nueces County Vulnerabilities18 %i. tfr Y. ,H. +dna orxurvU A ;n+a+nxn V It t 1Ni - ri,,,cy a W�" `" tx1 r olorw+ t'tuttra� diem (ightirto Sho lineA4 t gy Proloot 1. t t10 ^t t;wl u Nt iPitt t1W444 0 "Yt"lrettlpind &tk�; �Ytlt NN!4Iv 1t)o"Y"• jot Roo Crenin "A8a don trolYu ry m41, 18 Texas GLO's Coastal Resiliency Master Plan, March 2017 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 16 1 Page Unincorporated Nueces County Coastal Erosion Hazard SSSSSS\M Gulf -Facing Shoreline 0 Miles Laguna, Bays, and Islands 169 Miles SSSS\SltdtaSSS\S ISSISSISIIIMEMEMErranSMM �))���������� ISSIMMISSMSS ISSUEMISS N/A N/A N/A mastl,\11��������������� different rates along the coast line. lsssssrzmsassl..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, lsssssttmmrmttnssss irsim sun 75 100 TEXAS COAST EVERY 4 YEARS ltlrir; 100 11111 \1 �1 1111 ;ISSSS 1 011111�00� �� �� ��� 11 � � 1111111 1�01���,1»��1,���,,,IIS,,y�,t,���10���� �t � . Ifl�fl�� ,� . �„ fl � � � �„m � �t �t � �� �� »r R . �„ �� flim .ill 11� ,1I�i��� lol� l� �0111.1�� �� �» 1 � � Illi�i 111 Illi 1� .11111 111 �1\1��������„lig„��,�,��,,,��,,,,������������ ��������,�;,��11���������� 3 HURRICANES IMPACT THE N/A 96.7% N/A 29.1% N/A issss.ssztmrrrazns.s\ss. lastammintatal lastammtlasa istettmal scurcal sivanal itztran $35,252,463 $2,206,466 827.9 $203,140.27 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 11 17 1Page Figure 11-10. Nueces County Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast •,y wW o11111111111111110111111111111111 1 jWlii'Qi,iio^ mil .1111. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111! 10,1111111; 1,1l 11111100000 01[1000VIII 01110100101100,0 1100001000000000110100 pc BCWIYAYLi&,, 111cre ws Nt5warm, 1105.0 we Ca0xy01 kluiti-Juriacrintion800 hszsrd 00Aitlwiplhxtur¢.dicswm Plan C111,1411.10 i,.'1, 1a,!• mpar. II Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 18 1 P 000000 10000 0Y City of Agua Dulce Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 19 1 If" a City of Bishop Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 20 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard Gulf -Facing Shoreline Laguna, Bays, and Islands 17.6 Miles 280 Miles ISSSSSIIMISSSS% SSSSSSCZMMMIMltrraSS )���������� -8 different rates along the coast line. + 4.9 ents,A. -1.55 lsssssrzz,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, lsssssrttnmrmttnssss irsina sun 75 100 TEXAS COAST EVERY 4 YEARS IIWPIVIITSSSSNN 1\1�1 111 1\1 `111111 11\����0�����0�������1��\��1��11�,1,,;;„11111\1y1\\\1„1vfl�����\��bX11 >1 ��t�. �� ��,�.�„fl� � �� � � � �„ �� fl,m r� TR . �„ ��flim�” � �1I >\ �1�1 1 11� ��1�1 1 �» \ 1 � 111i�i 111 111i� 1� . ...111 1 ...111 ��� ��������� ��„�li�,�,����,��„�,���\11\���� ���������������� � �li�,�����\11\��\11\1�1� 3 HURRICANES IMPACT THE 17.6 96.7% 17.0 29.1% 5.1 Islassztartmumssiss issmazinr maw isssvtnnnass surnall num= itztran $324,781,580 $358,874,057 509.4 5124,990.53 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 21 1 Page Figure 11-11. Corpus Christi Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast lir di ip 714,Y,21.7111 1 5 i:1:1051 5011, L Lockwood. A,ndmmwln' fh wwaa.ako.Nn c, Counly C11: Muki-,11z1adictiona1 Hazard m.1111gaton Ad:',t9P.9m'Reev.r, •i am �,. al� AL r. -e :"Wwowrn Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 22 1 P ,n d' e City of Driscoll Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 23 1 If" a City of Petronila Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 24 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Coastal Erosion Hazard SSSSSS\M EaSSISS Gulf -Facing Shoreline Laguna, Bays, and Islands ISSSSSSII 3 Miles 16 Miles ISSSSSIWMIMMMZEIMEISSSMM ))���������� 111 SIN ISM ISM 1111111 + 1.6 different rates along the coast line. +8 + 4.8 mas,\A‘. slasss.surnass...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ltuEgzlsntrtatassissminaznionassassmx sun 75 100 TEXAfirz, YEARS II 32131 v`�� �b VIII� ��„ �t� �.��,���,�„ �� flim�I �����1�.11111 111,�,��,,,��,,,,����������������,�;,���„�,�,���\11\��\11\1�1� 3HURRICANES IMPACT THE 3 96.7% 2.9 29.1% 0.9 sass.sztartmuntass. ssuammintnasi sastannumans istrtnausintmallavanni ltztran; $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 25 1 Page Figure 11-12. Port Aransas Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast Loos sled. Andrews OLiftily MiAti-logiadtitionalf hazard 1agaIion Action -i;^Nan „w;rmr;.. C Cluairs lit E frtlkieul, uWl Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 26 1 If" ,n e City of Robstown Coastal Erosion Hazard 111 lull) Dill l,�,u��lo��o\�I �t�oo�o\�`�oo�o�����\ �\o Illi liiiil oilol� `o�o`I���\�\��111a Illlllol�l �o` ��I,�o\�o �o��o��„ 01� X11111111101 a��l�`� a io\�Il,,,,,o�a>�1a1� `000� �0\0»�1\��0\ IIII011� 1\111\ \�\\\ 1\11��1111111111111111 1111111111.0.1 111111111.`10 1.1111. 1`111.. 1 �1 0 � 01I 1 0� 1. � 1 1 a1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1���\�,��1,����\�\�1��1�����,>,��,�`�����,����1, ����,����������1„����,�1,����„�1,�,���������1,���,�,�„��`111,�,����,�����1�������,�,������1�\„11,�����c11�„,��1�������,����,�`1�„�,�1������,��1����������������� This is an inland jurisdiction that is not directly impacted by coastal erosion. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 27 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Coastal Erosion Hazard ISSSSSIEMISSSS Gulf -Facing Shoreline 20.6 Miles Laguna, Bays, and Islands 464 Miles Navigable Waterways and Channels 36 Miles InStattlan MISS N/A N/A N/A manx1.111.1‘. different rates along the coast line. lssssssnnnsssss,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ssssssxwrmttmrtmnsss 11101•1111111S %WM 75 100 sassamamittatammiliiiiiiia 3 HURRICANES IMPACT THE um; 1X111 t 1.. ro,1 � 1� � �� �i .., � l� �� 1U �_���� 1 fl� ,,. � � �� 1>i 111o211„g 11 111 1 11 1 . X1111 . 1ti 0 ,�V�,�,����„�„���\�����\\ N/A 96.7% N/A 29.1% N/A Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 11 28 1 Page lssssstatrnttrtnssss. astammintrass sssltnntmasss „ u0 �o� �mnsam 1 m ma. � � 1�. ,��i�.^ �„ 9�"`., 1P.. ,��i�im �. AI � ,�� 53�i�oa es3 5as1�imam 3 53ze iia eossstswmatsssu ssssrnrmasss Corpus Christi Ship Channel Navigable Waterway La Quinta Channel Navigable Waterway Jewel Fulton Canal Rincon Canal Intercoastal Waterway Navigable Waterway Navigable Waterway Navigable Waterway Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 11 29 1 If" a Figure 11-13. Port of Corpus Christi Jurisdiction Critical Facilities Proximity to Coast 11141111:11:1141J,,,, 11111111 r a IM'"'"" IMIIIIM """III i �� �Il �lw ugm ul, N Po111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lin 00000000000000000001 al v 1 101 �llil lh lri OCbrluV410,1 44114 .940141111 r'7'14+I.11o1wMY11M, IINte.. Il"M"°o11Io'C4'"s C ouV, 4)1., .,,a0t,;k' IRazittal Nqt9il'4'r'Ur A,M6l3'fl irryr�,�i Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 11 30 1 P ,n d' e pou 44"11111199N111111111 1m I! 1m �i 11mmm ( 1�� (i Tornado Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard 13 City of Bishop Tornado Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard 16 City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard 18 City of Petronila Tornado Hazard 20 City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard 21 City of Robstown Tornado Hazard 25 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard 27 Tornado Hazard Overview Description A tornado is a violently rotating column of air extending between, and in contact with, a cloud and the surface of the earth. Tornadoes have wind speeds of 250 miles per hour or more. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide and 50 miles long. Location Tornadoes do not have any specific geographic boundary and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to tornado activity. According to FEMA Wind Zones in the United States, Nueces County is located in Wind Zone III, associated to winds as high as 200 mph. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 1 1 If" ,n Figure 12-1. FEMA Wind Zones in the United States f Z .THE UNITE STAT.' /* qp ma, SII 4' oillolopoo 0,111011011111110,10,10,11111111111111111 19401019,101, 1111111 ho opoo ^ro��,wyg �rw4��rM iJ//�J Extent Ilmdll4* 011410911 WOW 11U uwvd M 0rts l000, 1411P 3164,11401W 0,661 *AM WiMM1R11431N V rtlriuWf040, 1161 ZOC ZONE EB 1"40 wohp 111 EOi1 4 IV ZONE Ei vtorq NUECES COUNTY Doonloolloolovoloolo Tornado damage is currently defined using the Enhanced Fujita Scale which took effect on February 1st, 2007; the preceding scale was called the Fujita Tornado Damage Scale. The Enhanced Fujita Scale is summarized in Table 12-1. The Enhanced Fujita Scale has 28 Damage Indicators (DI), or types of structures and vegetation, each with a varying number of Degrees of Damage (DoD). Damage Indicators are summarized in Table 12-2. Each Damage Indicator has a unique Degree of Damage Scale. For example, Small Barns and Farm Outbuildings (SBO) Degree of Damage Scale is provided as Table 12-3. For unique Degree of Damage Scales for the remaining Damage Indicators refer to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website (http://www.spc.noaa.qov/faq/tornado/ef-scale.htm I). Based upon the planning area's location in Wind Zone III, which can see winds up to 200 miles per hour, the most powerful tornado the planning area can expect to experience is an EF5. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 2 1 If" ,n EFO yrn A \ \ \\\ \ \m 11` 1 tttki 65 - 85 56.88% Table 12-1. Enhanced Fujita Scale1 Minor or no damage. Peels surface off some roofs; some damage to gutters or siding; branches broken off trees; shallow - rooted trees pushed over. Confirmed tornadoes with no reported damage (i.e., those that remain in open fields) are always rated EFO. Moderate damage. Roofs severely stripped; mobile homes overturned EF1 86 - 110 31.07% or badly damaged; loss of exterior doors; windows and other glass broken. Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well -constructed houses; foundations EF2 111- 135 8.80% of frame homes shifted; mobile homes completely destroyed; large trees snapped or uprooted; light - object missiles generated; cars lifted off ground. Severe damage. Entire stories of well -constructed houses destroyed; severe damage to large buildings such as shopping malls; trains overturned; trees debarked; heavy cars lifted off the ground and thrown; structures with weak foundations are badly damaged. Extreme damage. Well -constructed and whole frame EF4 166 - 200 0.66% houses completely leveled; cars and other large objects thrown up to 300 feet and small missiles generated. EF3 136 - 165 2.51% Total destruction of buildings. Strong -framed, well-built houses leveled off foundations are swept away; steel -reinforced EFS > 200 0.08% concrete structures are critically damaged; tall buildings collapse or have severe structural deformations; some cars, trucks and train cars can be thrown approximately 1 mile. 1 NOAA % Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 rdr ONNI 111 111111111111111111110 "0 000 Table 12-2. Damage Indicators Small barns, farm outbuildings (SBO) 2 One- or two-family residences (FR12) 3 Single -wide mobile home (MHSW) 4 Double -wide mobile home (MHDW) 5 Apt, condo, townhouse (3 stories or less) 6 Motel (M) 7 Masonry apt. or motel (MAM) 8 Small retail bldg. (fast food) (SRB) 9 Small professional (doctor office, branch bank) (SPB) 10 Strip mall (SM) 9 11 Large shopping mall (LSM) 9 12 Large, isolated ("big box") retail bldg. (LIRB) 7 13 Automobile showroom (ASR) 8 14 Automotive service building (ASB) 8 15 School - 1 -story elementary (interior or exterior halls) (ES) 10 16 School - jr. or sr. high school (JHSH) 11 17 Low-rise (1-4 story) bldg. (LRB) 7 18 Mid -rise (5-20 story) bldg. (MRB) 10 19 High-rise (over 20 stories) (HRB) 10 20 Institutional bldg. (hospital, govt. or university) (IB) 11 21 Metal building system (MBS) 8 22 Service station canopy (SSC) 6 23 Warehouse (tilt -up walls or heavy timber) (WHB) 7 24 Transmission line tower (TLT) 6 25 Free-standing tower (FST) 3 26 Free standing pole (light, flag, luminary) (FSP) 3 27 Tree — hardwood (TH) 5 28 Tree — softwood (TS) 5 Virrrzol1\��11V�uu��1111�� 8 10 9 12 6 10 7 8 9 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 4 1 If" a Table 12-3. Small Barns and Farm Outbuildings (SBO) 11?11\111111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Threshold of visible damage Loss of wood or metal roof panels Collapse of doors Major loss of roof panels Uplift or collapse of roof structures Collapse of walls Overturning or sliding of entire structure Total destruction of building Occurrences 62 74 83 90 93 97 99 112 11111\\1`t,»�»'';;fiV�11V11����1�' 53 61 68 78 77 81 83 94 78 91 102 110 114 119 118 131 Tornado producing storms can occur at any time of year and at any time of day, but they are typically more common in the spring months during the late afternoon and evening hours. A smaller high frequency period can emerge in the fall during the brief transition between the warm and cold seasons. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers For Environmental Information Storm Event Database Nueces County has experienced 108 (recorded) tornado events over the course of the record period from 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 (66 years). Table 12- 4 includes a summary of tornado events from 1950 to 2006 using the Fujita Scale and Table 12-5 summarizes tornado events from 2007 to 2016 using the latest magnitude scale the Enhanced Fujita Scale. Table 12-6 includes a comprehensive list of all tornadoes on record within Nueces County. Historical tornado events are mapped for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 12-4. Historical Tornado Occurrence Summary, 1950-2006 Stt%%%%%WMZIVEE%%%%%%%%M. tra S1M NM NMI INISAIM 95 8 46 29 11 1 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 5 1 If" ,n Table 12-5. Historical Tornado Occurrence Summary, 2007-2016 tiAtti ISSISS1 Mar 11 • TIM SSSSSS 13 0 10 3 0 0 117\11N. Corpus Christi Nueces Co Port Aransas Robstown Robstown Robstown Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Nueces Co Robstown Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 �1�111\1�11111111\111\1�`� ����� 7/28/1953 8/31/1953 10/23/1953 5/11/1955 5/11/1955 6/22/1955 10/4/1956 10/12/1959 4/26/1960 8/8/1960 10/16/1960 10/16/1960 2/5/1961 4/29/1961 6/18/1961 6/18/1961 8/21/1962 7/17/1964 3/30/1965 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 9/22/1967 5/7/1968 5/9/1968 5/9/1968 1015 2025 1515 1030 1030 1515 1330 1030 30 1100 1200 1310 940 1245 1500 1500 1300 2344 540 820 925 1129 1129 1444 1445 2245 1220 1230 '‘\\."1,1 FO FO F2 FO F1 FO F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F2 FO F2 F2 F1 F1 FO F1 F2 FO FO FO FO FO FO FO F2 \\\ASAI\ IA %NU WIN $250 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 $25,000 $2,500 $2,500 $25,000 $250,000 $2,500 $25,000 $25,000 $250 $2,500 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 1 $250 0 $0 1 $25,000 so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 6 1 If" a Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 (cont.) X01111 4 111111111\'��1��������������\�\�\1\ Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Nueces Co Robstown Robstown Robstown Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Bishop Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Driscoll Corpus Christi Nueces Co m �1�111\111111111\111\1�1`��`�� 5/9/1968 5/9/1968 5/9/1968 5/11/1968 9/16/1968 5/12/1969 10/12/1969 10/12/1969 10/12/1969 5/22/1970 6/24/1970 6/25/1970 5/10/1971 8/6/1971 8/6/1971 4/27/1972 4/27/1972 6/2/1972 6/13/1973 8/13/1973 8/13/1973 6/13/1974 7/13/1974 9/21/1974 9/28/1974 5/24/1975 4/20/1976 4/28/1976 5/7/1976 6/25/1976 6/25/1976 7/8/1976 7/8/1976 7/14/1976 8/17/1976 8/18/1976 1245 1335 1345 600 1745 1600 1730 1730 1730 919 1650 945 1625 1200 1200 1220 1250 135 1220 1005 1146 1400 1256 914 1645 1115 755 644 950 1100 1125 1136 1730 1345 1205 1200 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F2 FO FO FO F3 FO F1 F1 F1 F1 FO F1 FO FO FO FO FO FO F1 FO F1 F2 FO F1 FO F1 �a �a�� »�� �»��� »��ii iii i ��` '1'x'''1'°'�������'��„���,1�,�� 0 $2,500 0 $30 0 $25,000 0 $0 0 $25,000 0 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 15 $250,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $250 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $30 0 $30 0 $0 0 $2,500 0 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $25,000 0 $0 0 $2,500 0 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 UMW so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 (cont.) 111111 Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Bishop Port Aransas Bishop Nueces Co Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Robstown Corpus Christi Nueces Co Nueces Co Corpus Christi Robstown Petronila Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Port Aransas Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co 9/7/1976 8/21/1978 8/25/1978 8/9/1980 8/9/1980 8/10/1980 8/10/1980 8/29/1981 8/29/1981 11/9/1986 9/16/1988 9/16/1988 4/17/1992 4/17/1992 5/31/1992 6/2/1992 8/25/1992 6/2/1994 8/5/1994 9/12/1994 8/1/1995 8/23/1995 9/20/1996 6/17/1997 9/22/1998 10/6/2000 12/26/2000 10/24/2002 10/24/2002 7/5/2003 9/2/2005 7/7/2007 9/29/2007 3/6/2008 3/18/2008 6/2/2010 xply 755 1320 900 1530 2130 400 1730 1430 1530 1242 1630 2000 1255 1315 1255 615 955 935 1325 1930 1555 1739 1200 1645 1048 1500 1430 1319 1441 215 1252 1640 1140 1458 1340 2215 "\\."1\.1 FO FO F1 F2 F2 F1 FO F1 FO FO F1 FO FO FO F1 FO FO FO FO FO FO F1 FO FO FO F2 F1 FO FO EFO EFO EF1 EFO EFO ,A111% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 011\1111\\�1��1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAW k $0 V'' $0 $0 $250,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $2,500 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $5,000 $20,000 $50,000 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 $1,000 8 10", a Table 12-6. Historical Tornado Events, 1950-2016 (cont.) Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Co 11 1 6/30/2010 1/9/2011 5/8/2012 5/10/2012 6/2/2013 5/15/2015 5/24/2015 9/26/2015 1330 329 715 2120 950 1205 27 1415 \\.1\17 EFO EFO EF1 EFO EFO EFO EFO EF1 EFO \\\ASM\I B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AAA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��;u�y�1�y10�11�111�»111,u��1 onmc 11111% $0 $5,000,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $25,000 $750,000 $0 ViORV LILA so so so so so so so so Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of tornado events in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. Note, historical events are documented as a function of the origin of the touchdown location. A Tornado may travel over several jurisdictions; however, the tornado event is solely recorded for the jurisdiction of the tornado origin. Table 12-7 provides a general overview of tornado severity, probability, impacts, and defining characteristics. Probability for future tornado events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 12-7. Tornado Severity Defined ISSIV MSS 69% of all tornadoes Less than 5% of tornado deaths Lifetime 1-10+ minutes Winds less than 110 mph ISSIMISSI\ 29% of all tornadoes Nearly 30% of all tornado deaths May last 20 minutes or longer Winds 110— 205 mph 11111111' \ASS 2% of all tornadoes 70% of all tornado deaths Lifetime can exceed one hour Winds greater than 205 mph Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 Impact Tornados impacts are documented by the number of deaths, injuries, property damage, and crop damage. Table 12-8 provides a summary of impacts for Nueces County as a whole. Impacts to the county and participating jurisdictions is documented in the following sections. Tornadoes, depending upon extent, can destroy anything they come into contact with. Due to the unpredictable locations of tornado touchdowns, it is difficult to identify assets or populations within jurisdictions that are particularly vulnerable to tornadoes. Due to those two facts, all assets, property, and populations within the planning area are considered vulnerable to tornadoes. Properties within the planning area may experience power outages or other utility failures even if they're not destroyed during a tornado event. Homes destroyed by tornadoes will lead to displaced populations. Crops and commercial property destroyed in tornado events will have negative economic impacts. Table 12-8. Historical Tornado Impacts Summary, 1950-2016 108 2 1 Atit A ‘N\I\I 49 $97,408,590 $1,000 Vulnerability Tornadoes typically cross jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in and around Nueces County are exposed to tornado hazard and are at potential risk of impact. The damage caused by a tornado is typically a result of high wind velocity, wind-blown debris, lightning, and large hail. Vulnerability of humans and property is difficult to evaluate given that tornadoes form at different strengths and in random locations. Property damage is typically most significant for structures of light construction. Three types of structures are more likely to suffer damage: manufactured homes, homes on crawlspaces (more susceptible to lift), and buildings with large spans, such as shopping malls, gymnasiums, and factories. Vulnerability is defined for the county and participating jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 10 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard SSSSSS\ZISSS\SS County Wide (Unincorporated ISSSSSMZMI IntattaSSM 111 St 11 It It It at Sal linSiU11111111111111k�������11111 Val WS 1121 11111t1101 11 111 11111 1111@ 1 11111111���\11\1\�1111�1� 11,,,1>111,,,1111111,. w 1���11111 1 1�0 ,,,�11 11 ��111 � � w1 1�, 33 goo » � �� u 111101110 fi 11111 1111. 1 0111 X111 11 1 1 � 1 �` 111��1111111 1 ���111� 1 1 �1�11� ll� �� 11a X0111 �� l � 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 sssysstrzrs\sss.........................................................xz\\\\:\ntzrzzzmvmslvtasu 37 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 1.8 YEARS SSISSSSM\SSS% 111111111SIST1111111111111111111111211111 37 1 16 $413,000 ssssssFrtmsssli. 111 11111111111tell 15,274 $373,034,606 $487,429,634 345,880.3 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 12 11 1 If" a Figure 12-2. Unincorporated Nueces County Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1111 �u' 100001 1aliilllhluII 11111111111111111111 oom 000000000000000000000 moor 1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 1).11111111111111111 ta�u� 11� Ilftllll ,u, o 111111,11. lllllllllllllll�����' MI 8040190, 111111111111111111111 R 1� 111 II1I,11ii��IIIIIIIIIIP tAWAIv y' Qd, MI II IAV iMovr,men, 4rw, !!Apjrt bon ACI:Ort Man WJdrC,Cut%Coon 't,° wd�rem N,tda Sesgo "X"10 1^444, qccr,% C uiorl y fi'wrxkac'0 "Ir?aCk$ Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 12 1 113 ,n d m' City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard SSSSSS1M City Wide ISSS%%%%ttaS\SS%%% ISSSSSSMEE111Z1ZRSSSSSM\. NS NS SAI It WWII NM NM MN NM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ...................................................................................:..................................................................... zEzxztcnEMIS.M1 Agua Dulce occupies approx. 0.03% of the planning area. Assuming that the entire planning area is equally 0 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 vulnerable to tornadoes, Agua Dulce would be expected to experience approx. 0.0004 tornadoes annually or one tornado every 2,500 years. SSSSSSMS 0 0 0 $0 Vr' =iTMia�� IMMNISICIMMISSISISMEMMISSI ttit.\\I\ 11111111\11112111,111111111a 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 2.45 $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 13 1 If” a Figure 12-3. City of Agua Dulce Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) I� �I �l llIllI�1iI � I I�II�I��lll I 1 ' 0�I t�l �"II T'l� �lllI°l�lljV�j��Jf�M1 ���rfrrl'� II1IIIIIII' .nn�nIrrrrrrrrrrrrassnanrnanrrnanranansnsnanrn„n,�,,�.,,Ic"cl ,li',Ir�li I,�I, Iffy�1�11�11'IiilI11(lV,1I'Iu�� �Is1il I, 1( 1 1�rIJ1i1;11hI�I I 1J,1 11l1I m�iil�il�illili1li�illlll 11111 °°°°°°°°°°°°°°uuuutllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIll 1111��III�IIIIP!IIPIIIP!!1VIII ,p II 111111111111111111111111111111lllll1i 11 11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III II1�'l,l;l+i I 11 11 lil�(ppl1II111 Illll1 I11 �Vuuuunnununununununuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuw uui 11 1 I IllifI 1, 1II1II`IIIII(I uulii11ll�11,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111:,;,,,,,,,,,, IIII1I,LII 111111111 11 111H �l ,11111111111111111111.11$111111111111111 111111111111111 u I11111111 Y Aowa IOtAtik, 111 III 1111111 i. 111111 uuuu N11111111111111111'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'11111 1111$$1111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIII I$1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 uulllll Il 11 e,„ )11 1111 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII 11111 11 ,r111: h II III llll11111111® A!I 1 1141 r rI1n1- a+onq'M ,4,911,10 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 14 1 P ,n d', City of Bishop Tornado Hazard SSSSSZ a ISSIS City Wide SSSSS.IWMZrMlataSSMS.SM. NMSISIIIIININ MU 0 tt 1111 al NM NMI 111 al NM WM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ssssssz=nsss szi, gm= vallsizati 4 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 16.5 YEARS W.:...:: 111111,111ISIT ,"ISM WM MI 37 0 0 $2,777,500 ISS%%%%%!Z %AM \ ISINT NISSIZIE1 laSSI itA: till 1, ,d. ,�, SIN 11111.1 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 539.02 $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 15 1 If" a Figure 12-4. City of Bishop Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1111111111111111111111111"1111111111111111111,1„1„.„„„„ �`1:.!):',,F,1,1:1,1111,111111111111'1,11111 �TI�Pf"A';11ui , 11l!1IIII? nlui 111 ullllllllllll 11 Ih 1111 .�PGe�lll��,id rax,,llam 1m�Y 0.11.1 �� Il II Illllllllli 111111111111111111111111 i. I IIII10 li ��Illjl tVl' III( 1111,11 111 ";, , P'! 11111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 11111 1IQ mon ooh, )))!IN'!'dp a C�� p uoimmimu I'ql�� d�l� �1 1111111111111111 ' uu i' ui iiip I11II 11�� i���� as �,i jI�iiiiiiilii111111111111111111111111 iii�"' IIV'+IIIIII'ii'ilil II I4lu1�,1 �II1�� 1I(IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111,0! h s �111,1, V��I�nl�il�l'�4 doolPoll11011111111111 '' 010IiIli10111IIVillll11? ����ulll I�uulluuu u11uu11,110 III I Lmoor soom, Atooimm, Numom,aimw. 4iwu.. 41,4 „4„1111 m•n',,'u "1v” Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 16 1 IIP a d' e City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard City Wide SSSSSSISVMEEMM11SSSS\W Mr g":"^` 11111 MI NM 11111 &,ry�lf'YsIMENLIIIM UN UM 8 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 SSSSSSS\IEZMS\SSS ITEM SIM 51 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 1.3 YEARS cantami sum= �mem= 51 1 30 $91,660,590 l'‘sA\nss\\\ts-tftnrltttslslpsamkNa\sirruliititzurm stati lull\m4 65%\)%1\11A% 8 2 $6324,074 $7,007, 4632.44 ,044,01 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 17 1 If" a Figure 12-5. City of Corpus Christi Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1111111"11 11111111 ill 41 111000000001 11111111 4.4, 1;,io'wgm9!wS„1411114lr 11'4,41310'1d P'tiut',I^g744 (1,1110lanly ✓q, IMk4wvArvry , . d;Y f " "nl^ " 11,11 1 ..,„., umnimilmmumiu Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 18 1 P a d', m' City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard SSSSSZ a n\SSS 0 City Wide SSSSSSMZIIIMIMRSSMSSM 1114 1111 RI II 111 Al 0 0 0 0 � �..........ra,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fir.,,.,_............... 111 I N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ssssszz=nssss xvirca v suzzam 1 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 66 YEARS SS%%%%%!E 11111111 W..:: MI 1111111111111311111 0 �0 lan• Mit�SS�� � IV �, ,d. ,�, s%%AM \lane g��2111 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 464.67 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 19 1 If" a Figure 12-6. City of Driscoll Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 11I1111111111110111111111111111111110111011011111 01001101 ,41 orloror roorroorroor ,1011111111100 H111dJ!W 1111IrllOrrrrrrr1rrI pp Illllilllli 1� III 1)111 II III`. PI�' IIII�1� I1 Ilii ���� illlllllllllllllllll III` \���!` III 1 � '11111111111'1'1'11111 1 I;11 191�hII$ III IVlgl :HO 19 � 1' ILII Ile uuuuuuuw - IIUlm II 111111IIIIIIIu 11 �I 1111111 II! OrrorrorrOrrOrrOrrOrrOrr 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 oI1111 Iff111111111 li d 1111111 uI11111111111 11111111111111'1'1100000 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111ii 11'11 '1'1 .111111111111111111111111.„, „I 1 iii 1,�huhl�llllll111111111101'lll11IIUIIIII IIIp111111111p1p1IiI" I , Illuulllll111111llllll llllll111111liii dill ;1IIIIIIIIIIIhIh111111111111111111111111111111111 . 1V 111 I111if �jI1,10 II11I 11muuuuuuuu111l 11111 1111 1Il11 11 1 1111 1111111111111111111111111111 111�1'' '1111 111111111 111Iuu111111111111111111111111 11,11 111,1,1101,110110000,0, rur o 11,11 oor ol Or Or IP �IIhlJlll IHMON idllldl n li "" Ivo vvvvvvvvvvvvlvvvvlvvvi1""lvvvll I rr II MINIonmnocor A:, ,uQru Nor, *troop Notroorrooros, County Dor II!Lcroro011 d.urms4-r 'i'rrau�!m Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 20 1 P ,n d', mo City of Petronila Tornado Hazard SSSSSSI MISSISS City Wide SSSSS.SS ISSSSSMMMMIZSSSS 1114 1111 II littl II la 1111 o 111111111411 I? Int 11 at I al It 1 al VIMIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 isssss=nssss xim cm= v sizzati 1 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 66 YEARS \\INit rwmv \ %\.\\ \t\ Ut% 1 0 0 $0 $0 ISSISS \\1\112 Et It A\ %AM \ ISSIr lanai RS% ISSW IVICI lane II 111111111St 1St St Mil 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 926.66 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 21 1 If" a Figure 12-7. City of Petrolina Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1 IliI,I�V111111'111111111111'1 'AI'IIiII 1 hl'111111111,11111111111,1111111.111111111 11111111111111110,01110,10,„111.111 11111 111111,0011 Illaul l 111111 111111 puuuuulll 1111:11:111:11:11 �II I ,'I IJ I'I+I1uVi1hh i�lu � IIIIII uIII lii!P�'ul'dIIlll"lii"iIi'u� l 'I'IW' 1I i 'II 1 ern "0001111111111111111 1111111111111111111111 1111111 1J N1111111111111111111,1,1,1,11,11„1„„„„„„„„ 1`�I1 �'11 !11111 I�I"Il Ohi II III00II0[IIIVII III W II j'' J IIIIIIIIIIIIVIII IuI IIIIIIII V! 1I ,1011110 0011 im 111111'10.0111111111'1'11 i . I I 1111111111111 IIIIIIIIII I 00100 11111!111111111 N °III ! I 11111111111111111111 alb 00,000,000,101,11 plh.�100001, 111111111111111110111111011 IIII ,wl I 000001 1 �III �� 11111111111 l• I00000000010!0 101110 111 11111 1 1IwIIIIiI ' I I i',[1,,,,,,11'1111111111101111111 Vllll.• 11i111111111111111111111111111111111101 I' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I� 000.0 011,11,1011 001 111111011111111[0111""1"(11111111111'1111111111111111111'1111 UII111m10,1I1 II1111111 1111111111V14I11 11 10101111001 IIIIp 1111 1 111 10001 1111111111111111111111111111111011 V J 11111111111111 1911111111111;I';IIiV� 11 !I 0'1.0' 111111[00 00000000000000000000000000000101010101010101010111110111 11u0001[0:110jjjjj11 1111111111111111111111111 111111111.111,1,1:1:1 11"".111"1111111111.11.. li'lli111111),110101.111111 ,11"11111 0111 11 11100 10 111111111111111111111111 111011111,111,111,111,111,111,1,11 """" ""10 11111111111111010101100„„„100000000000,100, 1111 111111 11111111111111111111 111011 111101 011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111010101101111111111111 0111011010111 11 11111111111111 1111 111111111111111111 1 111 iII 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII 000000000000001111111111111 viol 1 .00011111N1 )011110 1 , ., 0 000JIp, 0$1miw'alim'aw"m.0P H4001001010101 IP.w:'*'"'u114C'@'IM,:n1r'h 111.00,001 40.10.0.10. l 410 000004 P 'rP!!'V:w104.4 ;I11 111111 .I 11111111111111111111111111111',::',1111111111111111111111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 22 1 IIP ,n City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard SSSSSItaln\n\SS 10 1 X10\117a\, 111 11 �� 1 1 011 1 a� ��t f 1 City Wide SSSSSSMMMMIZSSMSSM 1114 ICA 11111 1111S o z o 0 � �..........ra,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fir.,,.,_............... TrATZLINISTIMITIIMITIMNII 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 sssssszt=nssss 11 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 6 YEARS SSSSSSS%S% W.:...:: 111111111ISIT ,"ISM WM MI 11 0 3 $2,555,000 ISSISSITI I I %AM ISSIT arlanelaSSI Mit�SS�N 1111111S � "gig 1St 3,955 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 23 1 If" a Figure 12-8. City of Port Aransas Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 144°01'111.111111111 111111111111111fMA Pot Ada: unity Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 24 1 P a City of Robstown Tornado Hazard SSS\SltaISSSSS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 10 a �I1111110101 1111\\\1111,111. 111111\ 1 1 1 1 1� 0t1 1 1 �111��1 � II�1�1 � 1 w �11�\\\1 011\\, 11 1� a�\ 1 0 City Wide SSSSSSMMMMIZSSMSSM 1114 ICA Illtt IR UM s o 0 0 � �..........ra,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fir.,,.,_............... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 ISSSSSE..........:.....................................................................EIMITIME 1111111n1 10 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 6.6 YEARS 66 URI 111111111ISIMI WM MI 10 0 0 $0 lna\SSS\1 MEM n\SSSS\\.\\\ %AM Ental 11111n� qtr wee 11,576 $151,390,423 $183,445,540 6580.37 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 12 25 1 If" a Figure 12-9. City of Robstown Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) 1 »»»»»»l>kwU " ,1111 ;, Illlllllllllllllnl1 I I ,1,1,1,1,11111,1,111,111111111111111111111,1,11,111 0000ll000llmoov000vvov 1.I ,111,1,11110 INN' III ...!!!!!!!!!!!!1:1111,11", p lr 94' Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 26 1 P Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard SSSSSS\n ISSISS 1 Jurisdiction Wide SSSSSSMZIIIMIMRSSMSSM 1114 1111 RI II 111 Al o o 0 tin a,,...........................'�...�": �5'.........fi.,,.,_............... 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 * Fujita Scale replaced with Enhanced Fujita Scale in 2007 The Port of Corpus Christi experienced four of the 51 tornadoes that took place within the City of Corpus Christi from 1950 — ASSI................................................lEIMITIMEMSSIIM1 4 11/1/1950 to 11/30/2016 66 1 TORNADO TOUCHDOWNS ESTIMATED EVERY 16.5 YEARS .11111111, 1111 ��,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,,;�;,,,,,,,,,,. 5,insfifi$�S1111111WIrstx,,:� »»SA;;,iifi�i 0 0 0 $51,000 11"1111111114\ .�„ 1171,11\11111111% °;iii.,,_.1174,026,681 ISSUillniS111.1 N/A Industrial Area *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 12 27 1 If" a Figure 12-10. Port of Corpus Christi Authority Tornado Hazard Map (1950 — 2016) .4:6111., • 11111 11-111,111111111, 1111,11.1 141, ,111.1.1A111)))),1111t4111.1.111 ool000h000000vvo 44)11,11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 000 giwiury'BPol Nwownerri, LA'@'bU71d ¢ C 41 ¢'i"d 7,.,,1 o 'u¢or"I,co Acton Pi n Moroi nup ;Vu, „ua ROW licadlo 'N Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 12 28 1 P ,n d' m' ri 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 01« i m11111111111 imlllli ii Hailstorm Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Hailstorm Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Hailstorm Hazard 12 City of Bishop Hailstorm Hazard 13 City of Corpus Christi Hailstorm Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Hailstorm Hazard 15 City of Petronila Hailstorm Hazard 16 City of Port Aransas Hailstorm Hazard 17 City of Robstown Hailstorm Hazard 18 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hailstorm Hazard 19 Hailstorm Hazard Overview Description Hail is a form of precipitation that occurs when updrafts in thunderstorms carry raindrops upward into extremely cold areas of the atmosphere where they freeze into ice. Nearly all severe thunderstorms produce hail aloft, though it may melt before reaching the ground. Multi -cell thunderstorms produce many hailstones, but not usually large hailstones. In the life cycle of the multi -cell thunderstorm, the mature stage is relatively short so there is not much time for growth of the hailstone. Supercell thunderstorms have sustained updrafts that support large hail formation by repeatedly lifting the hailstones into the very cold air at the top of the thunderstorm cloud. In general hail 2 inches (5 cm), a little larger than golf ball, or larger in diameter is associated with supercells. Non-supercell storms are capable of producing golf ball size hail. In all cases, the hail falls when the thunderstorm's updraft can no longer support the weight of the ice. The stronger the updraft the larger the hailstone can growl. 1 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 1 1 If" ,n Figure 13-1: Hail Development within a Thunderstorm im TT 1 LIV H 1 II H r ‚ 1 1 LY r Location 11 UIUUIUII Hailstorms do not have any specific geographic boundaries and can occur throughout the county uniformly. It is assumed that the county planning area including all participating jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to damage from hailstorms. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action PIan - Section 13 2 1 Extent Much of the damage inflicted by hail is to crops. Even relatively small hail can shred plants to ribbons in a matter of minutes. Vehicles, roofs of buildings and homes, and landscaping are the other things most commonly damaged by hail. Hail has been known to cause injury to humans, and occasionally has been fatal. There have been no recorded fatalities or Injuries in the region. Hail size is estimated by comparing it to a known object. Most hailstorms are made up of a mix of sizes, and only the very largest hail stones pose serious risk to people caught in the open. Hail of quarter size and larger is considered severe. The extent of hailstorm is uniform across the region Historically, hailstones almost three inches in diameter have fallen in the planning area. For future planning purposes, all participating jurisdictions can expect hailstones up to three inches in diameter. Figure 13-2: Hail Size Comparison Chart2 Size Camped .:on Chart ApOmpiprAgyr gpAr ■ ift 4111111111111111111111111111111 10y)) urn rrrrrrrrrrrm I�0 . „6k!J4 000 Table 13-1. Estimating Hail Size3 2 NOAA 3 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 3 1 P a Pea Marble Quarter l \ 101 1 �m 4 Diameter 1/2,,z Diameter ISCITIESS Virtually no damage. Slight Damage to plants. Virtually no structural damage. Some damage to plants. Some severe damage. 1" Dents to vehicles. Extensive damage to Diameter crops, plants, minor bodily damage. Severe damage. Ping Pong Ball 11/2" Paint damaged on cars; shingle roof Diameter damage; limbs broken; extensive damage to crops. Extensive bodily injury. Severe damage. Damage to windows, metal roofs pitted, Golf Ball 13/4" aircraft pitted, trees damaged, total crop damage. Tennis Ball 21/2" Baseball Extreme Damage Damage to roof tiles, Significant structural damage to buildings, risk of serious bodily injury. Extreme Damage Cars and airplanes severely damaged, 3" damage to forests, humans and animals seriously in danger. Softball 41/2" Occurrences Total Destruction Buildings destroyed, fatalities in humans and animals; cars and airplanes destroyed, forest severely damaged. VIESININ rr N, 7 ii i ,r r auNiy yi NAti ,i)(te )10110\ 111 ,111H1 III Hail producing storms can occur at any time of year and at any time of day, but they are typically more common in the spring and summer months during the late afternoon and Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 41Page evening hours. A smaller high frequency period can emerge in the fall during the brief transition between the warm and cold seasons. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers For Environmental Information Storm Event Database Nueces County has experienced 117 (recorded) hailstorm events over the course of the record period from 03/21/1956 to 04/22/2015 (59 years). Table 13- 2 includes a summary of hailstorm events from 1956 to 2015 and Table 13-3 includes a comprehensive list of all hailstorms on record within Nueces County. Table 13-2. Historical Hailstorm Occurrence Summary, 1950-2015 MAUS 118 1956-03-21 1957-03-03 1957-04-27 1959-05-10 1961-04-29 1966-03-28 1968-05-17 1969-11-26 1971-05-10 1971-05-11 1973-06-11 1975-05-01 1976-04-07 1977-09-08 1977-09-08 sssssswmzrzlzasssssxs inta tra tin Ea ita 28 15 42 5 6 19 Table 13-3. Historical Hai storm Events, 1956-2015 3 a` o � io iouri �1 ;r\I0 11 1 110010111111 11 � X1011 1 1� 1 1 I���` �1`1 1 �1 1�~�1���11\1� �11111111� � �� 1��1111.1 ���������1��,��y�� � X111 � �\�11� 11 \y����� 15:35:00 1.00 0.00 0.00 15:00:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 04:30:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:20:00 2.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:46:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:45:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:00:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 22:50:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 19:50:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 11:55:00 L75 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:30:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Corpus Christi Robstown Nueces Corpus Christi Nueces Nueces Nueces Nueces Nueces Robstown 09:00:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 22:20:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:40:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:40:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 5 1 P a d', m Table 13-3. Historical Hailstorm Events, 1956-2015 (cont.) 7�����1�!11V\\\\0 1980-05-22 00:15:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 1981-05-29 1985-05-08 1986-10-26 1989-05-17 1992-02-24 1993-05-02 1994-05-13 1994-05-13 1995-04-11 1995-04-11 1995-12-18 1996-04-05 1996-04-05 1996-05-11 1996-05-11 1996-08-14 1997-05-09 1998-03-07 1998-03-07 1998-04-18 2001-06-07 2001-06-07 2002-05-29 2002-12-12 2002-12-12 2003-03-26 2003-10-25 2004-02-24 2004-02-24 2004-02-24 2004-04-06 2004-05-13 2005-03-20 16:45:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:44:00 17:53:00 17:00:00 15:30:00 07:37:00 17:15:00 17:00:00 00:15:00 02:00:00 01:45:00 11:30:00 11:45:00 17:00:00 17:10:00 15:25:00 13:20:00 00:05:00 00:20:00 12:32:00 15:50:00 16:05:00 16:18:00 06:15:00 06:35:00 00:25:00 19:00:00 11:50:00 11:04:00 11:25:00 09:40:00 22:38:00 03:25:00 0.75 1.75 1.75 0.75 2.50 0.75 1.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.25 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.75 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.88 0.75 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.88 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $2,500,000 $50,000 $50,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 mem un i� o� Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Bishop Bishop Nueces Bishop Nueces Corpus Christi Port Aransas Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Robstown Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 6 1 IIS a d' e Table 13-3. Historical Hailstorm Events, 1956-2015 (cont.) 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-08 2005-05-29 2005-05-29 2005-05-29 2005-08-31 2006-03-28 2006-03-28 2006-05-10 2006-05-10 2006-05-10 2006-05-10 2006-05-14 2006-08-30 2006-12-23 2007-03-13 2007-04-01 2008-02-16 2008-03-06 2008-03-06 2008-03-06 2008-03-10 2009-03-26 18:25:00 in (;� ,'y. l`1�11�i1ti11�1 \g1�11�i111 1"`1 t P! t P! viur a `v 1 A�11� a 0.88 0.00 0.00 18:19:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:20:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:25:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:28:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:35:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:37:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 17:55:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:27:00 1.25 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:10:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:30:00 1.50 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:25:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:30:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 18:40:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:52:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:45:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 16:13:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 17:30:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:27:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:45:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:30:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:35:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 17:22:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:35:00 2.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Robstown Driscoll Bishop Bishop Nueces Nueces Nueces 20:00:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 16:17:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:30:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 23:18:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 03:42:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 20:56:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:37:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:15:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Driscoll Robstown Nueces Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 14:50:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:44:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 15:10:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Bishop Nueces Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 7 1 IIS ,n d' e Table 13-3. Historical Hailstorm Events, 1956-2015 (cont.) 2009-05-23 2009-05-23 2009-05-27 2009-06-03 2010-04-17 2011-01-09 2012-03-29 2012-03-29 2012-03-29 2012-03-29 2012-04-16 2012-04-16 2012-04-20 2012-05-08 2012-05-08 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-10 2012-05-15 2012-11-03 2012-11-03 2014-04-04 2014-04-04 2014-04-04 2015-04-17 2015-04-22 2015-04-22 2015-04-22 2015-04-22 18:00:00 in (;� ,'y. l`1�11�i1ti11�1 \g1�11�i111 1"`1 t P! t P! viur a `v 1 A�11� a 0.75 0.00 0.00 18:05:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:22:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 19:27:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:58:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 03:48:00 1.00 0 0 $500 0.00 15:23:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 16:02:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 16:10:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 16:12:00 1.75 0 0 $5,000 0.00 11:11:00 1.25 0 0 $5,000 0.00 11:27:00 1.50 0 0 $5,000 0.00 16:03:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 13:21:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:52:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 13:06:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:48:00 1.00 0 0 $5,000 0.00 13:57:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 14:12:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 21:27:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:29:00 1.25 0 0 $5,000 0.00 14:24:00 1.25 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:16:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:41:00 0.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 21:15:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 21:30:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 04:00:00 1.00 0 0 $500 0.00 04:05:00 1.00 0 0 $100 0.00 03:28:00 1.75 0 0 $100 0.00 20:44:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 13:15:00 0.88 0 0 0.00 0.00 Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Corpus Christi Nueces Driscoll Corpus Christi Robstown Robstown Robstown Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Robstown Nueces Corpus Christi Corpus Christi 12:30:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:12:00 1.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 12:32:00 1.75 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nueces Robstown Nueces Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 8 1 IIS ,n d' e Probability Probability, or frequency of return, was calculated by dividing the number of hailstorm events in the recorded time period by the overall time period that the resource database has recorded events for that jurisdiction. A hailstorm may travel over several jurisdictions; however, the hailstorm event is solely recorded for the jurisdiction of the hailstorm origin. Table 13-4 provides a general overview of hailstorm severity, probability, impacts, and defining characteristics. Probability for future hailstorm events is defined for the county and each participating jurisdiction in the following sections. Table 13-4. Hailstorm Severity Defined 1101 00` 10 11 \0\\\1 ,110111111111 .1\11\ 00111011111011 0\1\ 11\111)( � 1 36% of all hailstorms. $0 to Less than $100 in damage. No bodily injuries if exposed to the hail. 011 010 11 1 (1 01111111111111 11111111111501111111 1\111)( 11111111 ( �I 1 � 1 11111\\`����1��`��`��`��111�\\0\11�1�1\\\\11\0\\� 111\\\\1\\11 \\1\1�\�411�\ ��i6ii���111111\1111\1,1�11��,1�������� 45% of all hailstorms $500 to $50,000 in damages. Minor bodily injuries if exposed to the hail. 17% of all hailstorms $100,000 to $5,000,000 in damages. Fatalities possible if exposed to hail. Impact Hailstorm impacts are documented by the number of deaths, injuries, property damage, and crop damage. Table 13-5 provides a summary of impacts for Nueces County as a whole. Impacts to the county and participating jurisdictions is documented in the following sections. Table 13-5. Historical Hailstorm Impacts Summary, 1955-2015 A \ 118 0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 9 1 P a Vulnerability Hailstorms typically cross -jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in and around Nueces County are exposed to hail hazard and are at potential risk of impact. The damage caused by a hail is dependent upon the size of the "hail stones" and result in damage to vehicles, buildings, roofs, plants, trees, and especially crops. Vulnerability of humans and property is difficult to evaluate given that hailstorms form at different strengths and in random locations. Property damage is typically most significant for vehicles and structures of light construction. Three types of structures are more likely to suffer damage: manufactured homes and recreational vehicles. Agricultural crops are especially vulnerable to 1" or greater size hail and can lead to total crop failure. Vulnerability is defined for the county and participating jurisdictions in the following sections. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 10 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Hailstorm Hazard SISSIZERSIS County Wide (Unincorporated ISSISSIMEMMUMMISSISSIM.. 11111.111111111111 Ira TM Una Int 27 6 2 8 0 1 7 3 ISSISS.112 ItaS\SSS 1111 1111111 2111111*111 1 HAILSTORM ESTI TED EVERY 27 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 2 18 YEARS ssssssttas.ss.s Amil\\\ y r qs �Amu j•% fisssS���S��S� ,�fisssS�fiSS���� ,�fimsS��S�S����� � �sS��S��S��� ��4tt�� 27 0 0 2,050,100 lsssslra lit* w.11 , 11 watualtlualus 15,274 $373,034,60 $487,429,634 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 345,880.3 0 $76,735,126.03 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 11 1 If" a City of Agua Dulce Hailstorm Hazard City Wide istassmmtimmtmassa ssss\swamzmnnssssssm\. tra mu Int In% Int int 1110111111101011111111111111 11011111 11 1 111 1) 1 111111\`111111\111\1�111�\l1\1\\11115\\111�1��\11�1�\l1\�\111\\ .11,11,",1", �,1�,1„1,11. ....111„�1\ \1 \ �t 0\� � 11 ��� � '\ igt 0 23.7% 12.7% 35.5% 4.2% 5.1% 16.1% 2.5% *While the City of Agua Dulce has no recorded hail events, because hailstorms take place in a spatially unpredictable manner, it is expected that Agua Dulce can be impacted by hail events in the same way that the planning area as a whole impacted by hail events. A probabilistic distribution of hail extent of based up on . . th . has been ��������������0000000000000000000 0 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 .06% annual chance, or one hailstorm every 1666.7 years ** **The city of Agua Dulce occupies approx. 0.03% of the planning area. Probability is based upon an area -weighted proportion of the probability of the planning area 11.\\ %MIA\ WttAtA\ a. 0 00 :o :o 1,71 SSA.Rntt Sirrill1111 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 2.45 $601.78 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 12 1 If” a City of Bishop Hailstorm Hazard ISSSSS • City Wide sssssrmtssss.. sssssswmztttnasasss\m\.. W. 11 !IM 111111 IV 11 IV 1111 11 6 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 ISSSISS1 MI ASSISS EA 1•1111 Et SUM 6 3/21/1956 — 4/22/2015 59 1 HAILSTORM EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 9.83 YEARS istssansass \\ Alum\Aim Tar',�fiss\',�fims�S��S�S����� .�s�S��S��S���',�fiszwtt 6 0 0 $50,000 $0 ls\stlmmamlssxmttasss c> 111111111 SIM, ,,,,SEIM 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 539.02 $132,257.68 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 13 1 If” a City of Corpus Christi Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSS\Z1MN\SSS\SS City Wide CM= 1111111111111111% MT tnssssmmmrtmtnsssssssm. tel% 111111 TM MAI Ira 1E1 11,111 65 13 10 24 5 4 9 0 121.k‘: 111 1311 ISIMW 65 3/21/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 YEARS ISISSISERSISS � 1/00//%� y /1 p6 9"%MAI 'AMA'""' rfisss�S���S��S�Act\�,�fiw% 65 0 $20,650 $0 sslss.t.ixm.)miryio,ltttik M\T ‘1‘\ 324,074 �> ttrms 11121S11111111i ltapra?;,\„i..\,,k\,,k\k\\\.\1\\\t.\.\t 324,074 $7,007,832,685 $10,238,656,508 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 24632.44 $6,044,014.65 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 14 1 If" a City of Driscoll Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSSI M\SSSSS City Wide .SIItt 111.1S11 SSSSSSSI 1 II 1 MISISS1 Vainal Itra 11M lin lara 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 ISSISS1122! EZtattla ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.NI13 3/21/1956 to 4/22/1956 5919.6 YEARS smassautisas. Amt\11% mully ��S�Act\\ w���c.F 0 0 Vr' =iTMia�� 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $500 464.67 $114,014.81 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 15 1 If” a City of Petronila Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSSI MISSISS City Wide SIMS .1\IM 1 11 I 1 MSS .S\\ SSSSSSSII 1 1 ISISSIMM Vat TMSta 11111 Int VIM 23.7% 12.7% 35.5% 4.2% 5.1% 16.1% 2.5% *While the City of Petronila has no recorded hail events, because hailstorms take place in a spatially unpredictable manner, it is expected that Petronila can be impacted by hail events in the same way that the planning area as a whole has been impacted by hail events. A probabilistic distribution of hail extent of based up on historical occurrences in the planning area is presented above. SSSISS1211A\SSS un 111 »11 311 0 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 0.3% annual chance, or one hailstorm every 333.3 years ** **The city of Petronila occupies approx. 0.15% of the planning area. Probability is based upon an area -weighted proportion of the probability of the planning area experiencing a hail event. sstsssntsss AA", ,1.\\A \\%.\\AA," Avv% wit 0 0 0 so so ssssSsm\ qltinr %VD 11111% \__-„ Ivan malt lirmx 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 926.66 $227,373.01 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 13 16 1 If" ,n City of Port Aransas Hailstorm Hazard Mna\SSS City Wide man lsasssmassss ,slassswmatmymssssssls. „„ , „)„11„„! VIZEMITSITHIERWRITH ,)„„„ 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ssssssmzcatsss lattaxlarmatu 1 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 56 1 HAILSTORM ESTIMATED EVERY 59 YEARS ssys—"""msp— a ma, 1 0 0 $0 $0 l".11S\pllr\\suTrrttlktMtsrritttwrnz Itrutittimmallvin sMxtrillirtsammilMal 3,955 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 17 1 If" a City of Robstown Hailstorm Hazard SSSSSSI MISSISS 16 City Wide ISSSSSMITIIZMIIZE ISSISS.SM. Slat Int Ira Int Int 4 2 7 0 1 2 0 ISSISS1122! ZEZIUMINSITZIW 1 HAILSTORM 16 3/21/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 YEARS sssss.stamss.s Amil\\\ upt tlAm fisssS���S��S� ,�fisssS�fiSS���� ,�fimsS��S�S����� �sS��S��S��� ,�fis,:'�,5w���� 16 11,576 0 0 $5,150 $0vrvantssAntla vrif%cammsati\-\ $151,390,423 $183,445,540 *Texas Association of Counties, 2015 **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 6580.37 $1,614,612.05 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 13 18 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Hailstorm Hazard EASSSSS. Jurisdiction Wide nizzosalssamotatirkassal. „\„\„\\\\\„\x„\„\\„\„\\\..m,,,„n„.\,„\\x„„\„„\\„\„\\\„... ,)„„„\,)„1„,„, Ent itna Ira "Inn Ira Ira ,)„„„ 0 23.7% 12.7% 35.5% 4.2% 5.1% 16.1% 2.5% *While the City of Petronila has no recorded hail events, because hailstorms take place in a spatially unpredictable manner, it is expected that Petronila can be impacted by hail events in the same way that the planning area as a whole has been impacted by hail events. A probabilistic distribution of hail extent of based up on historical occurrences in the planning area is presented above. SSSSSSSE11MMSSSSS 7133ESSIIIMU 0 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 59 6% annual chance, or one hailstorm every 16.7 years ** **The Port of Corpus Christi Authority occupies approx. 3% of the planning area. Probability is based upon an area -weighted proportion of the probability of the planning area experiencing a hail event. sxsllsssl"""mst\P lY'111A 0 0 0 $ o $ o IZEMI ‘‘‘A ISSZI R TEM ISIST attlaSS% 11111•11111211111111 Sinn ISELS% N/A Industrial Area **Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 ***Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 13 19 1 If" ,n jl/%/ 'f ffJllll IIpV" r!1 1111 11 . 1111171'It111111111111111E11111I111111N111 1111 1M11 I��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111 rfI r11 )h°oo1N11111'�„111 �1,, Expansive Soils Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Expansive Soils Hazard 11 City of Agua Dulce Expansive Soils Hazard 13 City of Bishop Expansive Soils Hazard 15 City of Corpus Christi Expansive Soils Hazard 17 City of Driscoll Expansive Soils Hazard 22 City of Petronila Expansive Soils Hazard 24 City of Port Aransas Expansive Soils Hazard 26 City of Robstown Expansive Soils Hazard 28 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Expansive Soils Hazard 30 Expansive Soils Hazard Overview Description Expansive soils contain minerals such as clay that are prone to large volume changes (swelling and shrinking). Soils with a high content of expansive minerals can shrink in drier seasons forming deep cracks. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging subsidence. Location Expansive soils with high clay content can expand to as much as 15 times its original volume. The soils in Nueces County, and most of the Texas Gulf Coast, typically contain less than 50 percent of clay soils that have a high swelling potential. Swelling potential in the Texas Gulf Coast is illustrated in Figure 14-1. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 1 1 If” ,n Figure 14-1. Texas Gulf Coast Swelling -Clay Map1 111.1(11,,,:.11,:'1„014.1„,/,((,,;,10,1011"!),,111:'.1'1.• #6 it 144g4( 11111419 Utin3fliol 1 ow i4 efelPairwwzike COHLORCOOE EXPIANATKYNI FOR OMILIP4G-CIAY AR iowt. 014,04,0w$,, dom.vtbre ihoth ywitkv tooNtorvi, VRI011 vbeletieby, 436 ullOort lottoelt. toom.hots c%0#,y h,,iti0000dt hvgl toronmoo 10%4 forip4f#9,10pcf, 4(1,,,my 44,49 fjo tlykwjerott, omfptill paoyelo4 . p4ps 44#0,t, ifiektroby "oum4 01#1Avoi 54) flr:144#41#4, #oolo hdoorej or41#11 opwAlone#4 Aigoplirie#4, IrlwAyontak4 Julioth.„ co#AnclorikA c'w iv,4hi#0,149;4 n#04, reititc000lo to 4344414 '6.0,0, Ip#26f Al 401 *Col /60 ANIONVII VIKW###/ 41 thown h keepatomen.:wg !Allem c#4; A USDA soil survey for Nueces County indicates that approximately 67% of Nueces County's land surface consists of clay soils as indicated in Table 14-1. 1 USDA soil survey for Nueces County Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 21Page Table 14-1. Nueces County Clay Soil Survey2 ISSSSMMarEtMrttn•EEtnnMi\SSSSM., 1211111 1111111111111MSS 111111111 11111VIRS Ba Banquete clay 11,896 1.7% €€;s;;� Bn Edroy clay 3,673 0.5% Cd Fc Lo Ma Oc Tc Tf VcA VcB Vd2 Vt Land Surface Extent Aransas clay 3,087 0.4% Sinton sandy clay loam 2,184 0.3% Aransas clay 2,809 0.4% Ijam clay loam 4,836 0.7% Calallen sandy clay loam 4,146 0.6% Aransas clay 4,842 0.7% Aransas clay 4,005 0.6% Victoria clay 306,474 43.8% Victoria clay 4,440 0.6% Monteola clay 3,072 0.4% Victoria clay 13,152 1.9% Total Clay Soils 368,615 53% Other Soils 180,745 26% Total Land Surface 549,360 Water Surface 150,851 22% Total Nueces County 700,211 100% 67% 33% Section 618.41 of the National Soil Survey Handbook (NSSH), by the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, indicates expansive soils can be measured as a percent of the volume change of an oven -dried soil sample when it changes from moist to dry conditions. This percentage is called the Linear Extensibility Percent (LEP). The LEP is calculated as indicated in Figure 14-2. 2 USDA Web Soil Survey Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 3 1 Ii" ,n Figure 14-2. Linear Extensibility Percent (LEP) Formula3 (moist length) - (dry length) COLE = dry length COLE = Coefficient Of Linear Extensibility LEP = COLE x 100 The higher the LEP percentage the greater the amount the soil will shrink and swell. LEP can be expressed in four Shrink -Swell classifications from Low to Very High as indicated in Table 14-2. The shrinking and swelling of soils with Moderate to Very High LEP can damage building, roads, buried infrastructure such as pipelines, and other structures. High to Very High LEP soils can even damage plant roots. Figure 14-3 graphically illustrates the distribution of soils for Nueces County by LEP Shrink -Swell classifications. Table 14-2. Shrink -Swell Classifications4 Low Moderate High Very High < 3.0% 3.0% - 5.9% 6.0% - 8.9% >_ 9.0% Based upon historical data and USGS soil data, all participating jurisdictions can expect a Very High Shrink -Swell Class in the future, corresponding to a Linear Extensibility over 9%. 3 USDA Web Soil Survey USDA Web Soil Survey Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 4 1 P a Figure 14-3. Soil Distribution by LEP Shrink -Swell Classification 100 1111111111 1,1,11111111111111,1,1,1111 ;;"'' "001 010 00111111000000 1111 ;0110000'1 011 .r ,11,11111,101,1,11011 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 '1111111116111111111,1E ✓CyrskwwJw' *, �Atot , etw ro, Occurrences I' ..00L0 -1 lMt.19 t4 n Adicr0 Ptolur So000 (w.s"ponstflit',yl. a.l"fi M S50RGAD Expansive soils are a condition that is native to the soil characteristics for specific geographic locations and "cannot be documented as a time -specific event, except when it leads to structural and infrastructure damage."5 'State of Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 5 1 P ,n d' e Damage due to expansive soils started to increase significantly in the 1960s when construction materials and foundations for residential homes started changing from pier and beam foundations with flexible sidings like wood to rigid monolithic concrete slab - on -grade foundations with brick and other masonry sidings. The rigid foundations with rigid sidings are less forgiving and are readily damaged by the differential swelling and shrinking cycles of expansive soils. Probability While damage due to expansive soils hazard is common in Nueces County, it is not well documented. Private claims documenting damages exclusively caused by expansive soils are typically not made available in the public domain. Table 14-3 lists the percentage and trend of foundation damage insurance claims made in Texas from 1960 to 2005 and includes forecasted claim percentages for the next five years from 2017 to 2022. The forecasted claim percentages are based on the claim trend from 1960 to 2005 as graphically illustrated in Figure 14-4. Table 14-3: Texas Foundation Damage Insurance Claims6 00 00 �o ��111 ��`��`��`��`�`��`���`�`��`����������������������������111 X11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'111 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2017 2022 *Forecasted 6 State of Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 3% 5% 9% 13% 14% 14% 21.5%* 23.0%* Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 6 1 P a Figure 14-4. Texas Foundation Damage Insurance Claims — Trend Chart all inn 2 :7.0% y:::::,0.0027x-::y.2307 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Another indicator of historic impacts and potential future impacts is the accelerated trend of foundation repair companies opening offices in Nueces County. As indicated in Table 14-4 and Figure 14-5, the quantity of building foundation repair companies with offices in Nueces County has increased nearly three -fold in the 15 years, from 8 in the year 2000 to 22 in 2015. The average quantity opening per year nearly doubling to 1.3 per year between 2010 to 2015, compared to the previous period of 0.7 per year between 2001 to 2009. Table 14-4. Rate of Foundation Repair Companies Opening in Nueces County 1 X1111`1 �1, `�"���� 111 1 �`������ 1VtitAt 1978 - 2000 2001 - 2009 2010 - 2015 1978 - 2015 11,11A\m" 23 9 6 38 8 22 111 7111PY1�m�1i��\0\�����11 Art 11\11\11\ 011�\11111111\\ilt ilii l�\ \\11\1\\1\\111\\1 0.3 0.7 1.3 0.6 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 7 1 P a Figure 14-5. Trend of Foundation Repair Companies Opening in Nueces County 19)0 'Alt) 401 Ornommulom.m, em...49moboomamouige' Offfirmocig.dpie...44' m06,04600.1,106dbuommAmomm9401.0'Mam"'41"°# 9 ,dOlf 4,(Sryt . :041, 1990 6, 2. 201 15, 2015, 22 2022 31 NIMed 001 ,M104015 Chten. a r? 14 11 'IS 11 Quantity of Foundation Riipair Companie3, with Officel trt Nuiticat County Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 8 1 P g Table 14-5. Foundation Repair Companies Opening Offices in Nueces County 4A\ 1 Du -West Services** 2 Dawson Foundation Repair Inc. 1984 33 3 CC Foundation Repar Co. 1986 31 4 BKB Structural Repairs 1989 28 5 Coastal Bend Foundation Repair 1989 28 6 Gulf Coast Foundation Repair** 1990 27 7 On the Level Foundation Repair 1996 21 8 Texas Superior Construction & 1996 21 Foundation Repair 9 Bridge Foundation Repair 2001 16 10 Leveling and Repair 2001 16 11 Streem Co. Foundation Repair 2001 16 12 Area Foundation Repair 2004 13 13 Eagle Foundation Repair 2004 13 14 Uretek ICR South Texas 2005 12 15 KJ Foundation Repair 2010 7 16 Level One Foundation Repair 2011 6 17 Crown Foundation Repair** 2012 5 18 Mammoth Foundation Repair 2012 5 19 Paramount Foundation Repair 2012 5 20 Sure Lift Foundation Repair** 2013 4 21 Wombat Excavations 2013 4 22 USA Foundation Repair 2015 *Based on the Better Business Bureau records. **Company has a local office/address but is based outside of Nueces County. ***Percentage is rounded. ****years in business is assumed based on year the BBB opened a profile on the company. vu � 1 �o11i11��o0�0��� � 1�0�� X01 ��» till � � U V111\)\1\1��111@ �' 1�1111P1)�11* 11111 1 11� 1�ao�1�11��1� 1978 39 2**** ti11\ 111111111111 \111 u 1 �11111� t 11 '�y�,����111111111111��111�����1�11�1``!111��11 >= 20 Years 11 - 19 Years <= 10 Years 6 ti N m With approximately 67% of Nueces County consisting of expansive clay soils, and the majority of Nueces County having High to Very High expansive soils as graphically illustrated in Figure 14-5, and the assumption that insurance claims for foundation damage in Nueces County follows the State trend, and that the growth of foundation repair companies in Nueces County will continue, it appears highly probable that all of Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 9 1 If" ,n the Jurisdictions in Nueces County (with the possible exceptions being Port Aransas, and the Flour Bluff and Padre Island communities of Corpus Christi) will experience property damage from expansive soils, which will further increase with anticipated population growth and development. Impact Swelling and shrinkage typically varies depending on the amounts of moisture content and clay content. Uneven shrink/swell cycles is what causes damage to building foundations, walls, roadway pavement, sidewalks, underground piping and other structures. Lightweight types of foundations like concrete pavement for roads and concrete slab on grade foundations are particularly susceptible damage from the shrink/swell cycle. Cracked foundations, floors, and basement walls are typical types of damage done by swelling soils. Private claims documenting damages exclusively caused by expansive soils is not well documented in the public domain. However, as indicated by the increasing trend of insurance claims and accelerated growth of foundation repair companies in Nueces County, varying degrees of future damage to building foundations should be anticipated as well as impacts to roads and buried infrastructure. The expansive soils hazard is not anticipated to impact the health and safety of the Nueces County residents. Impact can be measured in terms of property damage, when such data is made available. Vulnerability Expansive soils primarily represent a threat to buildings and subterranean infrastructure. Crops and people are not typically directly threatened by expansive soils. Vulnerabilities to expansive soils are determined by examining what critical assets and properties are in different areas of soil expansibility. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 10 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Expansive Soils Hazard sssssls\ 1.1\MV Ongoing MIST MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) oa »oloa1i11iii li�luuulii11191�� lo���ol»�� 111III1�a9�991 � \ 1 1 � 1. Q. I ��1��1�10��1���1�1��������������\������������������������������������������������������������������„11„1111�,111�11,�`�,11�1111„�,11��1111,11�,�11,11� 1,11,1�1��1,1�� �1, �11�1�1�1�0�1����`��������������\������������������������������������������������������������������ �,»�,,,,1» ��� ��� �II��,��I, ,11,111„�1� »»,» „` 11111111„1„1»�,111�1,1111 ��II� X11111111„ �„ „»I,»I�l �1111�1„��„»,»„1,,1,1,,,»,1,1„ 1,»„"�,,,,»,�„»»„»�,,,, „ 1141, 1„ „1,1..111. , „1. 1> > 1,„ �„» „ , 1 1 u I i 1 1 1 ��1�1�1��1�01�\������������\����������������`1111111,11111,,1,111�11,11111�1111�,1,1111,1111,1 11 �11�1,1111,1111 X11,1,,11,111111,11,111„11,11,111,,11�1„1111,1,11111,I11111,11,11,11111111�111�1111,,111�11111„,11� 1��111X1111�1�1����1�������������\����������������� 1,1,,,11„�»„»»1,11,,,,,,,,»,111»,111111111111111,,,,1,»»,»,,,,1,»»»,,,,�,1,�11,,,,,,,»I�1� �, »1111 »»II»,1„1» 1 �1, � 1 1 �, a1 ��1����01�����1���1�������������111���,11,11;�1111,1�1��1111,11�11,111�11���111��11«�1,�11�1„�111��\0��1����1��1�������������������\ ��1����01�����1���1�������������„111X11„1111�11��111�,1�11X1111�1�11,111�11,�11�1,1111,�111�1„�11,�����\0�\��1����\��������������� \ � 1 1� »lay 1�� 1 ll�oll»I ao I�alil�ll »�»�»I»a 1» o� 1��I III I lolo�» ao I�alil�ll »�»�»I»a 11 111 11� 11 1 111 11� 11 I u 1 u 1 � l l 1 l l nl �\ 1` m” 1 1` 1 1 ,x, ax i V 16� 1i11 V�u, � I V IY� 1i11 V�u, 1 X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��`��`�`�1111�81111��111�11�1111��11110�1��`�`�1��1�1�1��`��`� X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��11�\11`n�11�110�0�`111�1�110�0�»��1�1�1�1��1�1�� X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��`��`�`�11nIV111�1\\X1111101�11�1�1�1110�1�\�`��1��`��\�`�� X111\\111\11`�`��`��1��11�\11`n�11�110�0�`111�1�110�0�»��1�1�1�1��1�1��� ��� 1 tv=e 111 (�1111� 11111 11 r li i li n, nay lu aila ou�l0�ai1ao 1� »� »» sol»II of aila ou�l0�ai ao 1� 1n� lui lol m»II of aila ou�l0�ai1 ao 1� »� »» sol m»II of aila ou�l0�ai , ao 1�`� + � ��11111 1.1 1191 \1111 » \1\11 1.1 \1111 \ 111111111 1.1 1191 \1111 » \1\11111 1.1 \1111914 V�.....�� 14.. �� � � ,,. .914 �., � �� � 914.. ���11118111�111111I1111�4�11��II11����11�V1111`I���1��� 611111111���1@11111111111111����1 11�1�111��1111111111�4�11111��11�`�11���11���1611111111���1@11111111111111��11� 611111111��� 11�111IIhX111@1111111111111111�11111111�11���11111u1111��11111�111111111111��1� 611111111���1@11111111111111��11� 11�1�111��11111111101�1111�4�11111��11�`�11���11���� 611111111���1@11111111111111��11 LOW $32,623,800 7% 599 7% $24,334,700 6% 30,088 8% MODERATE $71,832,400 HIGH $121,204,400 93% VERY HIGH $261,769,000 TOTAL $487,429,600 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 1,028 2,848 3,924 8,399 93% $43,762,100 $104,723,300 $233,561,500 $406,381,600 xsssssstml\FFlrtzWssfiSSfiS��S�S��S��»»»»»»»»»»»>" ‘.1\AAA1M\ \\CC LOW HIGH VERY HIGH 18,014 94% 190,274 92% 118,361 356,738 DAM Belvy Lake Dam Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam FIRE STATION Nueces County Emergency Services District 1 DAM Chapman Ranch Lake Dam London ISD London HS Banquete ISD Banquete HS SCHOOL London ISD London EL Banquete ISD Banquete EL Banquete ISD Banquete JH Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 11 1 P a L Figure 14-6. Soil Expansibility for Unincorporated Nueces County oliiiiii ))11111111111111111111' 11111111111111111111 z 000, m wA, 1i11ll 111111111111111111 )011 01 1110101101 11.1111111111))111111111, ff'''', „II ii 11111111 o„niii lit it 1111111111111 1111111111111111111111 1 II 10111111111111111111111»»„, 011,-:.*"iiia°.11 11111111h1j uu 11C0I110111 1.11r,,mn„ma. HI)) 1111 t'he a°gra C.owrty t„, hatioiductg ria"' Hazard %a' ,,ton Ac Pr ApeorripbA'oty uOA 55,IhJR1(30 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 12 1 P ,n d', City of Agua Dulce Expansive Soils Hazard sssslssm. \sss SIM\ Ongoing MIST MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) 01 »lo nolo ,»I I» 1u�iai7171i� to»�Ilo», a�»i»���o���,i I � 1 �,�»,1»» »� �» �»»,��„ „1„1,,,�» »»,» „1» 1»»,1„»,11,11111,1,1,»w,»I„1,,,,1, »,» ,,,»,11» „»,,,,,111»I�III��11„»,»», ,�„»�»,� ,1,,,, »»„1,�,»»»�,1„�,»»»», „11 ».1 ,1, , »,11 1111,. ,,, , ,,,, a 1,1 » „1,,, „ , � n, v 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\�,,,,,,,,,�,�,,,,�,�Nn,,,,,1,,,�„�,,,��11„»,�»„�,,,�,��,,,�„�„���1,��»,,,,,�,�„N�,,,�„h����,,,,�,��,h��,��,��„���11�,,,,�,�,�,X11,;�,,,,����,���„�,»�,,,,�,���,,,,�,�i��,tile,,,,,�„�,,,,�,�„��„���11�„N��11„�,,,,�,�,���I�,�,,,,�,���n��„il��„���\1�1�1�1����1�1��������������������������������������� 111„�»I,»»»»„»,,,,1�»I»,1„�»,»,,,1,,,�,� 11,» »,» 1» „1,1„1»„»»,,,, ,,,,1,,,,�,� ,1, ,a, ».1 a 11,»,,,,11,1» ,1,1� 1 �1 l \ U 01001 \0110\1\ 11101101110011\11 b (111` � \�ll� � u, unu ,� � .171 � � 171. � ����0\�\��������\�������������������\�„��,�„�,,,�,,,�,,,�,�,,,�,,,,�,,,,�„N��,��„���1,�,ill,,�����\��\�����\���������������������\� ����0\�\��������\�������������������\�,,,�,X17,�,,,,�,�,��1�„�„�„N�,,,�„�,,,�„�„�`I,��»�,,,,�,�„�»,�„�\�\�\�����\���`�������`��������������� � to »I»1,11„ ,001a1 ` ,01 loo »011oo»I»o »7 ,1110 0» ,ii ai iu�a ,01 loo »011oo»I»o 1, 01111 1 11 01111 1 � 1 1 1 1 � » u » 1 \ \ t \ \ 1 1 1 � 1 � 1 1 11 l 111 sumnal i �� V� � 171 IIV��u, 1 IY� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�1i�w711���»�o�7oui»11o��0��`�1�1���������������� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�����1»II����o�oU`I�io��i�7o����`�`�`��1������� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�`ar o1171�0�11�oi���l�iiiii�,11�1�1�1�1�`��`�`����� 1111111`��`�`�`��`�`�����1»II����o�oU`I�io��i�7o����`�`�`��1������� ttin��11�`1�1`11a1»1 »11 111111,»11» 111111 116w,1111111,u o 711 171 111111,»11» 111111 116w,111111 � 111 a171 1111 111111,»11» 111111 116w,1111111,u o 711 171 111111,»11» 111111 116w,111111 � 111 u�n„,,,1 11111,11 l 1 1117»11111111,11 l11111 `� � 11111,11 l 1 1117 »111 11111,11 l1 1111 1a„, x, 171 �lW Emma mai �� MEM �Il�l�l�ol�o���ll�\�Ill�lo��l���'�1��1�1����11`�111�\�1���``II�� n�����7�����li�����1���7�����»�1���,��1�1��N�i��I���N�11i��1�11�` n��`�`�`, Im�\�`�`�1��������Ii�1��N���i17����»�11�„�����hs�,��l���hl�1 n��`�`��,�1�1�� n��`1�10�11�,���lim��l�a»���,��1�m�,��1���11h1���1����11��111\��1�1�� n��`�`�`, Im�\�`�`�1��������Ii�1��N���i17����»�11�„�����hs�,��l���hl�1 n��`�`��,11 LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $0 $0 $1,158,500 $19,552,700 $20,711,200 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 0% 0 100% 5 58 63 0 0% $0 0% 0 0% $0 0 100% $0 100% 0 100% $17,541,400 895 $17,541,400 895 11111111 " "" " " Iss\s" 111, "J"\\\rzPtttlnmBmnzamssssss: IA VERY HIGH SCHOOL Agua Dulce ISD Agua Dulce HS Agua Dulce ISD Agua Dulce Elementary School Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 13 1 P a L lihi',V'i uv � i"d1Y, li' dsilttVuu4 11 apNYuumP ,IP'; Figure 14-7. Soil Expansibility for Agua Dulce I�1111S11�i'�'K"uj1111111d11ioiii00ll'll!'II "„;„ IIIIIIIp111iu�ll"ill'���II .�"1I1'I��I II���1111X11IIII1 d°11111�1I1j��wI1Nm1„u11d11 1 AWWWW�I111111111111111 pm..,11Imi11�I�11muuu 1I1I Ii1,� lili1"1"IDII�4II�lI 1�II1II1�!N!VIIpN II',,IluI� 11 11 IID PN Iu� '1401:111,1""1,0!,1,111i11":111";11:1",11:0,;11 I�wIIu 0 11t" ' 11101 1111111 111 011 1.' ; Ij pp 111'11; 11111111 IIII1111000,. 011ll�p I'�liii� 1111 iiljplil llgf l�nI �' t 0000 e1111II' 0 00000 1!I011 1O00 III@ul 1111111111 111111110i1110 I loolhoIII 1111111 loolu! 11110 1, 11 11111 11111111111111111111 1 u 1000m0000001o1om0 11111111101011101011 11111111 1111001111111110011001011 1u „1�u0V1^Involoo m� l p1 m�111!II 111 11111111 i%�Ir�1I"I,�11'�111`dI�q1Im1'n,o„d1,111'' ,IIIMII I'111101111111n 11 I1i1 IIIII u uuu1111111111111uuuuluuuuuuuuu11111111101111plppp1�lMIliQllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111011 a "'"1101 li IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111,000, plllll��(III IIII q�n 1�,'i0111110111111 111111111111100 1�'y'llllpl'IuIlu,llillllll lll10 1 Y1111111I�N, IIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111 llIll 1111111111 u II III ill° ;1d�illul.0000101010101011 ii' I 1 ��I�InIYI�IIYIIYIIum11Imlllillllllnilllllnlllllmulmllnlllllllllm1111uI1�IImIImmIInI1lI1IlIIIImIImIIIIiIIIIIIil111 1 m III 11' 11 1 1111111110111111111(1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111°1 I���0 I I I IIII .1111111.i1111111.1111.1111.11111,111,111„111„111, lll 111 1" "111111 1 11111 11'11101111111111111111111111111111111 � I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 1 1 I I I I I II IIII 11111111 1 �II� 11 �r11IIIIIIII 111111111 111110000000000000000000000000000000000 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 �P"x �� 111110:1111,111111111111111111111,111111111111r111111 �1 n111111 111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ,,,II, ��u11111P1I'IYR LoK,INA0 h+»N'7tlr� ��m^wrl�lr•�^�,+�„a 4 RmoroAMfil,i 1114'gI(„ Gk,yo14uru'AIr,4YdII1710 nb@ 1'Ito:r df, IIR'1Ytl+i4, rtrlolo,„ Iw,o; Cell r IF '1'I 11 Sl m4 ;$M 6,114(,(„) Itlf (IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII@(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII V' I 111 11 fl d II 11110 11 II illNuun11111 u1111111u1111111111111111111111111111111111111u1111111111111111111111 u1111111uu1111111111111111111u 11111111111111111111111 1 11 11 111 u 11 1111 1111111111111 1011 130- u,,I, 06'„'IIS Immwlru ”, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 14 1 If'° ,u 00»I' 0 City of Bishop Expansive Soils Hazard SSW \ Ongoing SISIV MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) �� ,�01 »��,�, »,� »i,u�»iai717 ,i� 100�1100� ,Aa,711o,1a,0 I \ 1 1 \ \ U 1 �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\��,,,„»„�,»'�„��,»�,»,,,,�,»1111»�„X11»„»,�,,,�,I��„���,,,����0�0�1���\�0�1�������������������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\��� 1 �,,, » „ „ , ,11,11 7.,, L. 1„ � , , »„ ,�,,,, „ , 11 » » \ I s 11 \ I 1 1 V u 0 �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\�»,,»,»»I»��,�`�»,�„�„»�»,III,,�„»1,�,»,„�„�,»,�»��n,,���,»,»»�»��11,�,1�1�»,�„�,»111»�,�i�,��i�»J»„�,»�„�,1„�„��„N�„�,�»1»,�„�„I,»,�,�ii�,»i��,�„�„»�»,�„„�»11�1�»�11�1»,,,»»�„N��,»,�,��,�I�,��»��» �111111�1�1�1�1��1�1����`���������������������������������������� 1 »11 V 1 11 � 1 l \ 0111101111111111111111 111!111 II 1111111�� 1 \ 111111 1 ( 1 � �� � � „ ��u, u7 ,� � 171.E � ..171 �, 0I�� ����0\�\�����������������������������„N»�,»,�,�,,,,,»���`„»,�„�»,�„�„��1,11�„N�,�»,711„�������������������������������������� ����0\�\�����������������������������,,,,,�1,,,»,�,�»SII»,�„�„���1,��»�„»,��11,��,»,�,����,�1�»����������������������������������� 011�0�111�� 11 »» u� vu ,a v ,1,,,x111 ,,, »01,»0 »011,00a o ,1,1u ,a v ,1,,,x111 , 01 11oo»a »011,00a 111 1,1 ` , ,1111 1,1 ,1,11 � 0.1.1 0.1.1 1 u \ 1 1 1 1 1 11 0 11 1 1 nl � � ^ 11 1 ^ o \ ��������������������,»,�,17�»,��,»,�„�»,�,,,'�1�������������������� ���������������,,,�7w,,�7„�,,;�„N��,»,�,�„»,�������������������������������„�„m�1�„�,,��,7„�7„�,�,,,������������������`� ����������������,�,17�17,�,»�»111,�,,,�„�,»,»�����������������. \ �1 , » ,7� „„ 1x1,,,», », ,,,,117�w,7„11 ,,, „ ,» »» »» �„11 », ,,,,117�w,7„11 ,,, „ » 11„ „» �,,,, », ,,,,117�w,7„111 ,,,, „ ,1� ,17 ,,,,� »,», », ,,,,117�w,7„11 � ,111,,,1 l l 1117 »111 \ »11111,1 l l »�\» »11,\111» l l 1117 `� 111 1 111,1„1 l l 1 , 1 1 1 0 4 U 1 \� U 1 1 ,1 l �0 o�� �� �� � � ��� �� a �� 1 1 0 �\���1��\I�����1� ��„�11�,�i�l,�,�„�1�,»,�,»�»„»,��,hl�»����,tis1���1��1 ����0\,�;��1111111��� ��\»711,��1,�,�„a7,,,�„»�,,,»,�,�„��1,1��„N�11�1� ����\»�»,�,i�1�„�„�7„�7„�1„»�»I»il�„���,»���`�'��1���0� LOW $0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 7 1% $0 0 $0 0 HIGH $1,109,000 100 22 100 $1,705,600 100 338 VERY HIGH $98,264,100 % / 361 $114,184,300 %784 TOTAL $99373,10 383 $115,889,900 1,129 0 MODERATE *Rounded to nearest $100.00 99% �� » 7 111 0\ 011\ 01111111111 III 11111111171 1111 \1111111\O1 »\\1111111»11111 11111110111111 »»111111111 1 1.11 1 V � 1 1 VII � � II 1717 ������0������������1»,11�»,1�11���»,„11»�»,"1,�,�1`�7,11»,1111»�1��17«�11,�;,,,»�1,1»7„�»���»I��»i���1»��1������0�0�01��1���`��������������������������������������������������������������������� �\ »»\ »\\, »,»I»�I11111�111„1,1»� 11,1»VIII IIS„1111,11»»I»,1,,,,111111» 11»„ X1,11»,»»I �11111�1,11111,,,,11,,,,,» \\1\111\11 1 11111. 111. 1 111 I 1 ( 1 ) 1 1 U 1UU 1 1 �� � 11 � I) ,� �1 �1 1 �1 9 � u , ��`�"�`�1`1�7»�7�1�I��7�1,11�7�7��171�7�1u�»11�71�1�7�,11�17��1111�7�7�`��1��6i1�"�11111�1»I �1m1�171�7'��7"�1�11�171���`�711���`�1,��1��1�71�7"�7���������������`�`������������������������������������ 11 1St" 0�u I 7�u�» VERY HIGH SCHOOL Bishop CISD Bishop Pri Bishop CISD Bishop EL Bishop CISD Bishop HS Bishop CISD Lillion E Luehrs JH Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 15 1 P a L Ili IDR iVmp Figure 14-8. Soil Expansibility for City of Bishop VI�IIIDAMVV ?,11 111111111 1111 01 100 11,II11I111111H11 1 1 1�111l IV H11 1I11I11II11�111 ''pX��1111II�II 1I aV1 puuI 1!l� 1 VIII IiM1i111.11,111 �1 1111 I III I 11vIA111�1'1'1'111'111 lV'1M1I11,,11.,1.„'111111.11111111111111111111111111m dVI1I1111� pluu19NNW1N1111 1111111villuIl..1, 111111 1.0101 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Ili IIIIII 1N11I iMumI111IIIIINllll 11 IIII 1j1II111IVIN11l1qIw�uwwl�wu�moo� V9 9 °V A 11111111011110 X11 1 o1 IMI 1 111 1 IHI,iiI �II WYu I orv! o 1.'0',;; 0,',,;;',.', !A! 1 IMI1I1111 1 1a lululu III1 110101h i,l;l111111 uII t 10M0010J0 01111111111111111111111100000010 Mmm"M I�l�u I�w!111aY!Vu1u1u1uuum umull nn 11 1�I11111mIIIII1p 111N11111111111111�11v111'1N1100VII III�NNYl pumi Idu AMM IIIl 11111111 u'i'I 1 M 1oNomuuiuu1 111 ��N11IIIHHHHHHHHHHHH1111111 101111111 IIIIIIIIII11111 11111111111111111111111110111000000vvl AV MVIVI��.MIY nlm11nw am n ,111111 mm 10111111111111II V00 HH 111' II 1111111 IIII( uuuuuuu�� (1111 HNxx NNYIXx!II qw� VIII V MMMT l'M' N°,11 yl 1 Ilel'0111111 VIII 11IMi1 llllllll1111��111 �1��1�11IIIIIl1 '111 11111111111111111111111111111111 fi Y 11111u Illus I I III 1 > ul��, IIII , II I111u1I,I,II�IUIVV °ii IIIIIIIu9Vil II1II1ii ii1111111111 III, b,,l 'i'hnl� III, I'I u1111111111111111,111111111111111 111111111 „vvvvvv!w IIIIIIIIIIIII,, 1 il,l" IIIIII-vvvHv1 �PY11 Y�M11N1 uIIIII �IVI tin 11 I11a�svvvv,0 ,la 11111111,1111' ,N «IIIIIs�sss:1111.!!N11111�1tititil1!wII'I 1111111111111111111111111111 !!!! 01ilIN'''lh CV Np'IUMI "I IIi0 ulll ul�1111 Xw I"11 I VH111111111111111111111 Vv'lMu gyp�',I���� 1,ll lll�,n I,I � MoIvvvoloolovoovI 00i01 11 �I�I 111 v ,Ivilvvvvvvv1,11,11vvI ouuluul JJ 11 ii111 VV i'll�l'f,ll� VIIIIIII Iu,l '11 'll l' ���NNUI 1vmmJ 1111 �II1llIIpIn101110v itlW011011111111P, 111111111111 wl „1,1,11,vvv,vvvvv,11111111111111111111,1,muN Ilal !a o11,.,,;aW Viva aw 011,0103 M pae or A:tVon V1114001 •'.01;'#011° P,' w007.41#tllW07'►' n, sno, sr; UURRGO wµ $4, t.$0,0,40044,001V01011, 101M000 , Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 16 111111, ,u , #„„ City of Corpus Christi Expansive Soils Hazard ssassx.. Vlass SSSIY AIM Ongoing SSSSV Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) \\ \�0\»»1�1 »I� »ilul»i6016161 \oo�\\oo� 11a611�6,1a» 1 � 1 1 �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����,11,1111,�111'�1,��111�1111,11111��1111�11�1111,11111,1�11��,1���1,1����0�0�1���\�0�1�������������������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\�� \\\ „\\\ \11111» I» �I»»,»1,111„\\\,�,� »»,» \6\» \\\I,\\\I»111,1\1111\,1,»w1»1,1111» I»II I» 1111,11» \11,1»»I �111,�111�,\\\,»�»1»»I 1�,\„�»1� ,\\\\\ \11,,,\,�„1\»,�\\\,�\I,»,1\» \ \,1.6.1 „ \ , \\,\\ 1111,..111. 1,„ � , , » \111\\ „ , 1 11 v \ \ 1 I 1 V 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\����\�11111111,»�Il���lhl�lll�ll�ll,�lll��lll�ll�»``1 �1111,11�11�111;�11���11���1111,»X111111'»I�Ill�ll�lll��lll�l���l�llllll�lllll�„11�1���11N��1�,1»Illl�ll�lllllll�l�i�llli��l�ll�ll,�lll�,l�ll�lll��ll�ll�lll��»�I,11»�IIN�I�Illl�l��lhl�l��ll���ll���\�1�1������������������������������������������������������������ \\\�\\\»,\�\\,\»ll»,» «II,»111,»�,111�11111,�„ »»\ »I�\ \» \,\,\I„\\\,»»,11»111 „111111,,, \1 11 1 111 1 1 \ 1111111111\11 1 1111 1 \ 11 \ i \\1 \� \ \�\\� �\��\\\�� 111 1111111 II (111\II�\� 1 � 1 \\ 1 1 ( 1 \ n � \ \ � Q l l n�l� l n ti 1 1 1 pp�� a ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\�����I��I,�,1111��1,;,11�»�lll�llll�l�llll�l��lh�1111���1tis�11111»111�1������������1�1��11�1�1�`��������������\��� ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\��1111�1��1111�,11�11��111�����1��1�11�11;11111�1��11N»IRIIII�III�II�II�I,II�;������������������������������������� 11111) \1��\1 0i 0 \�u 101» »i »11a o1 aoo��\\ \\o��\ooa Iw Iw 1a1 61 I \000�o v o1 1\e\ \»� o�ll»o\o 1\ ���\ 11 1\\\\ 1 1\ \\1111 \ 1 » u u \ 1 1 1 1 1\ 1 \ nl � � 1 1 1 �� „ V 1 �� n„ p 1 �� n„ 1 0 1� 1� l� 1� u �����\�\�����������������1�1�»1�11?�Il�lll�l�llll���������������ti�������� �����\�\�������11�,1»�Illl�ll�ll��ll�lll�ll�llll»����������������� �����\�\���������������1�1�»�,11�11�1,11�,1111���0\�������0�01���0�`�`�� �����\�\�������11�,1»1111�11�111��111�111�11��1111����������`������� t �1 t 4 � 4 V�1 \111 \\\1 \\\\\ 111 11116 1161ll111111 \111 11 1111 1111 1141 111,11 111 11116 1161ll11111 ' 11 11 1111 1\11 1111 110.1 111 11116 1161ll111111 \111 11 1\11 1» 1111 111,11 111 11116 1161ll11111 ' 111 11 � 11\1111 t 1 111N 111 1 1111111 l 1 111 l 1111111 l 1 111N 111 .1111111 l 1 11 1 � \ X11 u, ,, X11 6 ��ll � � IIII 1 � � IIII 6 V 1 6 V� 1 6 V� 6� V� ��10\1\11�,1»II1i1111�1��»�I,11»�1111�,1�11���1��11�1���������� ��1��,»1�1��11� X11»,I��li�l�ll�ll��\III,1»�1,1111�,�11��1,1��IIN�11� ��1�0\,1,�;��1\1\01 ��1�0\11�,1»��,IIli1111�11��»�I,11»�1111�,1�11���1��11�1��������� ��1��,»1�1�1� �11�„�I�i�ll�l�,l�l�llll�,»�»,I,II��Ih1�ll����ltis111 ��1�0\,�;��1111111�1 LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $3,924,789,300 $1,287,620,300 $529,867,600 $4,496,379,300 $10,238,656,500 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 38% 8,035 44% 2,374 62% 1,064 56% 6,990 18,463 $2,765,339,300 $727,346,000 $640,573,600 $3,014,746,400 $7,148,005,300 39% 61% 0 11l0 0\ 011\ \1111 6111611611116 111 \1111111111 1\1111�1111�11111 1 11111 11111 1111»1111111 1111111 1\ l 1 .1111111 5 \ 11 � 1 \l,\\�\,1»1» 1»�,1�1� 1111111„�Il„� �,1,,,�1„»,,,»I»\II»ll �I1111»1�11�1,11,111�,,,�,\�,1��,1»» \\,1 1, 1, , »�„\ ,11 , 61� 1 \ 1 1 1 n �1 11X0111�010�11S�`���\1»I,\»,1��,,\I1,\ 1,»»\�I»I,\I»,,»I,\1,»I,\,\1,1�»�1,11,,,1,\»1,1�,\»11„»I,\,�I,\���,\I�»I,\I,»I,\11111111111111��11`����������� TArrir "IV • AV%1 .0100101\001 Hal 100111110101110��\ LOW DAM EOC FIRE STATION 31,630 30% 5,240 40,617 70% 27,514 105,000 Barney M Davis Cooling Reservior Dam Nueces County Emergency Operations Center Nueces County Emergency Services District 2 Fire Station 3 Fire Station 1 Fire Station 8 Fire Station 7 Fire Station 13 Fire Station 15 Fire Station 16 Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi HOSPITAL Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi ShorELine Driscoll Children S Hospital Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 17 1 P a MODERATE SCHOOL FIRE STATION HOSPITAL Dubuis Hospital Of Corpus Christi The Corpus Christi Medical Center - Doctors Regional Ray HS Seashore Charter Schools Seashore Middle Acad Roy Miller HS And Metro School Of Design Hamlin Middle Seashore Charter Schools Seashore Learning Center Flour Bluff ISD Early Childhood Center Oak Park Special Emphasis School Evans Ses Houston EL Mary HeLen Berlanga EL Crockett EL Allen EL Shaw Ses Collegiate HS Driscoll Middle Hicks EL Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff Int Zavala EL Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff Pri Corpus Christi Montessori School Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff JH Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff EL Martin Middle Dr M L Garza -Gonzalez Charter School Gcclr Institute Of Technology Menger EL Fannin EL Wilson EL Coles HS And Educational Center Flour Bluff ISD Flour Bluff HS Windsor Park G/T Travis EL Calk EL Harold T Branch Academy For Career & Techn King HS Baker Middle Fire Station 4 Fire Station 14 Bayview Behavioral Hospital, A Campus Of Corpus Christi Medical Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 18 1 P a MODERATE SCHOOL HIGH VERY HIGH DAM HOSPITAL SCHOOL DAM FIRE STATION HOSPITAL WATER PLANT SCHOOL South Texas Surgical Hospital Carroll HS Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Pri Browne Middle Moore EL Veterans Memorial HS Por Vida Academy Cesar E Chavez Academy Schanen Estates EL Adkins Middle Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi South Post Acute Medical Specialty Hospital Of Corpus Christi The Corpus Christi Medical Center - Bay Area The Corpus Christi Medical Center - The Heart Hospital Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Academic Career Center Smith EL Barnes EL Calallen Reservoir Dam Annaville Fire Department Fire Station 6 Fire Station 9 Fire Station 10 Fire Station 11 Fire Station 2 Fire Station 12 Corpus Christi Rehabilitation Hospital The Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest O. N. Stevens Water Filtration Plant Trinity Charter School Bokenkamp South Park Middle Calallen ISD Calallen Wood River EL Moody HS Jones EL Grant Middle MirELes EL Faye Webb EL Por Vida Academy Corpus Christi College Prep HS Sanders EL Montclair EL Woodlawn EL Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 19 1 P a Los Encinos Ses West Oso ISD West Oso JH Kaffie Middle Wynn Seale Metropolitan School Of Design Galvan EL Kolda EL Kostoryz EL West Oso ISD West Oso EL Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Int West Oso ISD West Oso HS CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen East EL Richard Milburn Alter HigHSchool Haas Middle Discovery School Of Science And Technology West Oso ISD Kennedy EL Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway HS Early Childhood DevELopment Ctr CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen Middle Meadowbrook EL Gibson EL Cullen Middle Yeager EL Dr M L Garza -Gonzalez Charter School Dr M L Garza - Gonzalez Charter School Garcia EL Dawson EL CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen Charter HS Tuloso-Midway ISD Tuloso-Midway Middle Club Estates CalaIlen ISD Magee EL Dr M L Garza -Gonzalez Charter School AccELerated Learning Center Mary Grett School CalaIlen ISD CalaIlen HS Cunningham Middle Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 20 1 P a Figure 14-9. Soil Expansibility for City of Corpus Christi r1uyiiu, 111111111 IN 1 00 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 11,00,111111111,10,00,0111 11111111'1', 11111111111 1111 01,01411111111,111111111 zm� III 111111111111111111111 lo oill.1. 1111 Ill 11111111l 11 01111111111111,, •1 n1ll illW', 1111,11 0111 111111111. 1111111111111111 mm1111 11111d" 11111111111111111111 ' Irl I� 6titiyiliiH h,�U YimT ; ww111IIIII111111IIIiII' PlY»^;rEpp hww„',PIV,1V www, PEEP ,lEPCal fPrr ,11 w,wor mir PVP w wstEw Pr ,wwwww, ,srlr'rl PPE T' a' IEWEparprEPPE luu!ul1 „„ ro, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 21 1 P City of Driscoll Expansive Soils Hazard SISSISSIMINWI • FaISSI SISIVA MSS Ongoing 111114 AMISS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) 00 »��, 0n,7 lul »i lu�»ia»77 ,i� �oo���o»� lAa,711o,1a» i l 1 \ \ � 1. 1 V 1l 11 1, \ 1 � � v , 1 1 � \ 1 I ssss , 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\��,,,�„�,,,,�,�,,�„�;��,�,��,,,,��,��11„���„`�,,,,,,�,�,,�,,,,,��,���n,,,��,,,�,,,,�,���n,,,,,�ll�l,�,,,,�„��„�,1�„N�,I,,,,,,,�,,,»»`�,� �,,��,,,;��,m�l��,�,,,�,,, �„�„�,>I�„��1,,,,,��,,,,,,�,�„�Il�ll�,�l�n�l,,,,,�„�,,,�I�I�»,�„�1„I;I,I�,iii,�,����1�1������1�1����������������������������������������� 1 \ \ 1 11 � ti, 1 �� �, a ,1111 � �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1�1���������������\�,,;Il��„�,,,�,,;�,,,�,III,,,�,,,�,�,,,,�„���,1I�„��»1,�,�1�`��,,,����1��1��1����1��1�0�1�`�`�������������\�� �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1�1���������������,,,,��1,,,,,�,�„��„��,��,��11�,�,��,,,,�,�,,,�1�,,�»,�„�1„m�l�„������\�11��\�1�������1��1������������������ pp�� 1111111���1 » ��o»» o,,,,,»�n ` »»� ,��„i���, ��,»��»»» ,� » nu »„» »i,o�u oa ,�„�,�ux �,,,w�oa 11 1 �, 11, �\ 1 „ 01„� \ �\ � » \ 1 1 l l 1 � � 1 1 1\ 1 1 1 \ 1 1 � � J � l 4 1 d \ n„ � n„ ```1 � , � y� l 11 1 , +�1 (IY 1 Ym��,1 ex �IY� u ����0\�\��������\�����,,,�,�,1,,,�7„�„�I„�,,;�111�1���������������� ����0\�\��������\�1,�,�7�17,�,,,�„1�1,�,,;�;,�,,,,»�\1�1\011�1���������..����0\�\��������\������„�„m�1,,,��,,,�1„�„�,,,���`�1����������������� ����0\�\��������,�I�I�„�,,,�,,,�Il�;�„�„�7„�,»��������\��` n„ ,, mum � 1 1117 »�h ol\�»» 1 1 »�h � lll,»» � 1 1117 »�h �1\�»» � 1 � 0117 � � t 1 l � 1 \1 1 1 \ �\ 1 1 1 �� a ��� � 1 �1111�11111�\1���\I�1111\�1111�������\��1�\���I,\`�111�\�\���``11�, ��\„7,1��,i�1�„�„1�7„�„»�1,,,,,�,�„��,,1��„N�i\1��11�1 ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1� ��„�„„�i11,�����7„�,»�,,,,,,,��,h;�„����,tis111�� ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1� ��1�\„�»��,hh,,�„1�7„�7„�1,,,,»»I„i;�„���,,,���`�'��1�1�1 ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1� „m�l�„ill,����h,,,,�„�1,�,,,,��hi��71���,�,���� ��1�1,�0111 LOW $0 0% 0 MODERATE $0 0 HIGH $120,200 100% 9 VERY HIGH $13,134,900 105 TOTAL $13,255,100 114 0% $6,500 $0 100% $0 $25,495,800 $25,502,300 0% 15 2% 0 100% 332 98% 383 730 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 111 \\ \\\\\\1111111111»1111117111111\ 1111111111111111111111111�111� � \111\ 1111111111111111111 l 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1��1��1��1��1�01��0���\�\0�\��������������������»»�»�,,,�`�1»�,1,,,»�»X11,,,,1�1,,,»�,�,,,»�1��,,,���,; »,,,,,,,» »� ��� �11��,1�7,IIIlI,,,�1� »\l» »„ll,�l,,,,»»»,» »» �I 1111»I�I1�1 „I,II,� \»»»»�»»»»»»» 11 I » 11 11 \ »llll 111. 1 111 � l 1 � � I �U U 1 V� II � � ,� 171. 171 I .171..1 ���u, ����`��`����1���������`����������������������������������������������� »�\I,�»I�1�»�1 ��1,�1��»,��,��II�����1»,�I�»��»,��1�»»�,��II���`�»��,���»,�I�,��1�»»��,�I`�»�111�»,����I�»�1���1�����1»,�I��»,��1��������������1����������������������������������������������������� 1,11vtati4t �,,� uc\ VERY HIGH SCHOOL Driscoll ISD Driscoll EL & Middle Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 22 1 If” ,u L ..,.,,I.11il�lljllPllrl''N llllluulul Figure 14-10. Soil Expansibility for City of Driscoll I1I1I,lIII �^µ1�%I�II��'I'i IId1(�1IU�II�•I� I�"11(„I��l�;l�l�,l�1 'lIl4 11\1l�il I;I1liIII ll�lumu°l',umIullulllIl!Il!IIlIullulllluipil)i l!i,IIlIII111I�NIIp 111 p1II";IuI"'�il�lYIlpIl1�1�i1llI1liY„'iI' "uV�111�t^`l�IN`rllllV1�11l1I1, lViI�7uoIIII�IIIIIi1lIlIl�IIIIIllI lll�Illll.�lI�, .1 o��1"lull�lr”lI, II .11,1111�IIldIlIlh InI' II„Iu� „ �",d�I`.�gl�lll,l11l1Il1�I1lI1lllIll II lllll:il l"iI�liI' I IlIuV�I1�1 ". ll11111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111,11 IIIII 111111111111111111 luuu111111111 II IVIlIlIlIlII.'��ulIuvvl dml 1111111111111111111111 lr,lllllllllllllllllllillllIllIIIII11111IIY1IIIIIIII"innnIlll1l Ilii+Illoillllllllllll` VlIIIl`�1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II Ip, IIIumiiiuuuumm!1)1)))) l uVIIIIIplipIIIVIIIIIIIiIlII ( Yl�VII1l11Io omIo�I � 111111111'1'1'1111111'11111111111 „„„ N 111IIIII11111111111 I1111I:II1II1IIIIIIIIIII lI III ,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111„ IlIlIlI IIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIp 11 111a11III1llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll11111u 1 1 1d11111111 VIIVVV101 uuuulN'IN1I'dl I„ai,IIIIIII�II.II.IIutluuuu'lulu lls l IIII �N11 llil l'ull VV1l�Y'I'�II (IMMjI l�lII''1 „'i m11IY11 1)1111110 NW1,11,11,1111011,11,,,'II �!Il" IV11..111 j�ljj'VIimif1NN !u uuul�ulu I�I� MIR I'�hmmmllWlullpl ll �h 1 1111111111111111111 d 1s III 1111 11111111111111111111)11 �I�1t1 muuumx13VAN li'�1�liilll lllllll I I� �lI IV n lJJ I� II�,I I�11111111I III 111I,II1111111111191 IIP lull° lel o111 1 III I� I I 1'I 1V ,I 11,1111'l 11111111 111111111111111111 1111111111)))) 1,111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1, 11111 1°"1111111111111111,1111111111111111111111111,11111111111111111,11, 111 111111 1, 1, 11'luumuuuuuum lll'111111;IIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 �1I,u 111r 11 1��„1111,111,11,11,11,11111111,11,1111111111111111 mIuOI�:!um:U:1UmUm�U�UUUN 1mmlNm�VNWNdIoUuf 111„ 1II Q u�m��IInuIIm1I�1mm1�� mm......�r 11O�I� li� 1 mmmmoolomImmmmlmW1NN1'III dII1IIdP1Wl IIImomNImmNNNNWNmWWm 1u1 IIuuuuuuuuuuuuuunlm1nnuuuuuuuumluumaauluu'louulunuuuun'ulouuumuunuuuu11u11111 I1j1� m'Im :1Im,1VIIIIWIIIWIIl4II I1I,iItllI,Immm11nlmmmnmmmmnlmmollo III (II�. ” I1VVC,II @I1h"III";�1 II111^ u 1II11'1 1N1VI11I�1�I1I\II 1II��� I . � 11111g1�D III1, II11I1II III1� I1PiII1 ii1,MOMMl om 1 mmm1ImImuIW �N ,,,, ._,,,�'m hIII1 u���� � p l�lll � IVIIIIIII1I11%1��,,.�I1;I CI1 V��� IIII,II11 lII 11IIINlII�VuI MI.I11u.ImII. I1IVIIliI o M,11111, 11111111 �N.\�AlIl II�1pI�uSI�I11u Ii IuIi1,�II1l1I, I1I��!I1III 11lIII 1 IYlI IlloI'1If1'I ��Jll1�l,l6IIl111l'1IIP1,+�IIIi1�1w1I�11 pI'If 1V.I 1�1',1I1\11 IYIIIi1li1 11 l lll'I�lI 11�l1I l\i1.��+1I mu»I(I1����IiI�I11u1Pu1 V11l1II 111I�1I 11 I�uI�ulu11IIIIII�IIIIIIIII�T I1 �IN�1 nIJIu�I�5 4 ,norilwlm o mrm,11.'wn'" � 1V,10,110 -,,,N,,,"111414 r,". r ;r+1pIN „' 4,01.r tO M.',11,1944401, d141;"I'gvo IP14wn pIglin,sukawlogy 1111111111111 1\IA\ilpol���V^�\\\111111Wu�II�IIIIIl111 ,��III�•�����1111111111111 'I�la�li1m1Iu�l1III VI'��i�,,1 I1��f1I,�P ; 1„1 ^l;,,1 �1u1I1IIII ;1 n �plI WI1m�1111 )V111m11�411,Um� �,1�m���1�1m'il1g�II1I 1i��.u111��”„ld111�m"�l1I�1m”u1Ii��\mpmtl1 IVmIVn\m"m�VlI�",J„\III\I�"iII��I\IppIu II��I INmm"I1mVuu\mu\\„A�m\um mu'' 1 ''��"�uIYuuu'iuI um"u, I mmI°IImIIImIXllm1�l�u1I1'lII1�II1 yIIplimwll1 mlt l��l'VI�IImIII1�II1 IIIIm9I 1m1`1m1.11I�.un.'us' ��~nn1m�Il��imemumNm111N111111111 1111u11i11 1I1I IIIIIIIIII�I II�III 111111111 I IL�VII��MI�NII MII�III �II�IIIIII III uII I�IIII I111111111111111111 uI IIII vvl IIII�WMppIIlI ��l1I 111111111111,,,, III 1II1I1I1I 11111111 111111111111111111 I��II I 1I ''' 11110111010„1100000000000 IIiii%Io�II V V''iiuup1�1�1u11uuu111u��111111111111�1111111u11111111111111111111���IIIaIIIIII 111111 I„l „,,,,„11111,11111111111111 11 11111111 Ili^ NJtll�u�o1o11l1llhhlll�lul 1111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 23 1 IP ,u ,.x.11 r' City of Petronila Expansive Soils Hazard SSSSSSS\M.SltISS\S SSW ASS% Ongoing ISSIV " MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) o\ 00\ 00\�� »1 »i lu�»iai717 lig \00�\ \oo� 1Aa1711011a» i 1 1 \ \ � 1 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\�����»,�„�'�„��1„h„�,»,�„III,�;»,,1„»,�,�,»�,���»II��,»���\�1�0�1�����\�1�������������������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\�� \„ 1,,,11„1 »� �» �»»,��„ ,11„\,,,�,� \\,,,» „1» \,,,,1\,,,,,11,1111111,1,»w,»1,1111» �»�� �, »I 11�„1 »„ „»,»�»� �Ill,�\„�,\,,,»�,,,»»1 ,1,�\,,,�\, \\\\\\ 1,»„1,�,,,1,,,�\I„�,,,»„1„ „11 ».1 \, , , \\,\\ 1111,..11. ,,, � , , »,\ \�11„ 1, , » » I s 11 1 , \ 1 � 1 1 � n, 1 I� 1 1 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\,�,�1„�,»»��,,�»�111,�,�,»,»��,��I,,»,�,11�1;`,»,�,�„��,»,�;�,���n,,,��»„�,»»�,��1,,»ll»�1,�,»,�„Ill,��,�i�,»IIS,�,1„»,��,,,11„»��„��,�„1,�,»,�„II„�„�„II`I„�ii�,��,»,»�1„»,�,��,�Ilh��,��ll,��,»,�,»�„���„�,»�»�11�,ti1���,����1��0�1�\�1������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\�� \,\ la11,1 \\1,,,1,,,1,\» 1,1a » » 1 1 l U T l 01001\0110\1\11101101110011111 P 0 ( (1\1\ 1 \I11� �� n, n�1� � n \ � 1 1 �� � u, Ilnu ,� � 171 � � 171. � � �\��\\\\1��\�1�\��1�1�1���������������,,,�1�7�,»,�,��,,,,�,�,,�,»,��»,�„�„i��1,1���,,,���„�»�»,�„?11111\�1�1�1�\�������������������������� �\��\\\\1��\�1�\��1�1�1���������������\1,�,»X11,»„���„il�,»�»�»ISI»,�„�„�,»�»,�,SII„»,��,�,,,,17`w�»„�����\�\���1�\�������������������������� 1�� 1 011 \» a11U 7ullaln a 111 1a\o11\\ \\o11\Iloa 111u au 7i of »i »iia \\71 \\a\ \0110\o»\oa 1 111 1\\\\ I1 0\\\\ \ 1 u v u u 1 l 1 \ � t 1 1 1 1 nl � J l 1 1 1 m 1 m, � �� V � � 171 Y���, x 1 i � IY� u 1 11»111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`�\������i,@lll��io���lu�io��,l�io�i�,1�`�1��1�`��`�1�`�����1\1Il���m�»�Il�io��i�lio���`�`�`�`�1�������� ttiM �1 1��11�`1�111 1`11ti c tin7 as \\0 \l0» »I »ial 7aw1»sailno a71\ 011 \\01\0\» lual 7aw1»iai no a on oo as \l0» »I »ial 7aw1»sail lu 0 71\ 1» 1al 00» »i »ial 7aw1»iai �no u � \ 11\11\ 11 l l 1117 » 111 I `� »1\111» t l 111 I `� 1 11\l\\ 11 l l 1117 »111 .11111\ 11 ll 111 I1� \ \ 1 1� �� \ 11 1 1 � � \ 1 11�171 7, 1I�1��1�1�����1`�111�\�1���``II�1 �\,��„11»Ali„�„�m�,»,1111„�»,I��,�Iln„11`I1,�II�`�10� ��1�0\V,11�\\11�� �„�\�1„�I�1,�����1»,�,»111,»„1�,h1�»�I��,ti111 ��1�0\V,11�\\11�� ��1�„m�11„�I�1,����1,1»,�„111,»,����,11�7111�1�,1111��1���1 ��1��\�,,������� �„�\��,�I��I�,�„���1»,�,»111,»„�,h1�»�I��,til1\1 ��1�0\V,11�\\11 LOW $0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 0 MODERATE $0 0 $0 984 HIGH $0 100% 0 100% $453,000 100% 4,423 100% VERY HIGH $3,201,100 87 $3,261,800 5,486 TOTAL $3,201,100 87 $3,714,800 10,892 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 0% 11 was 0\ \0\\\\1111111 IIIII11111 11111111111\0110101101111 011110\1110111111111 \111 X11 ll 1 1Uti1,111111. \ ( 1 y � 5 1 1 .,� � X17 �������01�������0������������������������������������������������������� 1»1»„11»,1` 1,��,,,1»»��»,\„1»,11,1 ��,1 ,1,11111,11111111��111i11������ �\ »»\ »\\, »,»I»ill lll�,l l„1,1»�,Il l»VIII IIS„Il�l,,,lu»,»,1,,,\111 �1,» „»„ �1, ,1»,\ \\ 1\ 1 11\ 11 1 11111. all. 1 1111 ( 1 )1 U �111 �1 � 11 � I) ,� �1 1 Nr oA 11�11�1 1A1\��\\"`��\��1\»\\0001\�1�111111110010\1�\`I\`1111�����11111111111111�111111111111111111�1�1�����������������\\\\\\\\0\00\\000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ »\II»t���������������� VERY HIGH SCHOOL Bishop CISD Petronila EL Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 24 1 If" a L liPopp Figure 14-11. Soil Expansibility for City of Petronila ii�1I0UUU�,pINl I4 ^0 uI�M0.'uiV� u II 1111 Illr 111111 I I I ol 111111 PI III omuimpmm 1 , 111111111111111111111111111111111110100000100000000000000000000000 11����11� �IIIIII""""p111Ippppppppppppppppppppp1p,1p1p1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p,1p11'pipll'P'P'pppppppppppppppp pp 1,111 Pi1:111fill 0111111111P 1 11 1001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100.0000 , IIIIIII1111111111111111111 11111111: 1011001001111.111111.0 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Iui 111111111111111111111111 111 1 11.1.11111111Apppppopoppoppopppopppoplly ........11111111111°" � ppPPPI PI PH } •hF tilti!,a11.1 PP pp:1pp pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp.p..ppp..„,ppppoppppppppppppppppppppppppppopppippppAppptpPP ,I„1„1, nuplippppippIIII111111111 IIII IIII IIII II II II I 111010010 IIS 11Ik111�I1111 IY11 II II' IIII 1 �I III IIII III 11111111111111111110011111111 I 111IdJpfy III 1,111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 o uiuH��i 1...0000000000110111111111 .00000 poompapappao IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII unnunnunnununInu111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II 'III III II A' OVA A (Pilurprzipp ?VOW AP! WiPPIP;114 ozzo 1 4) 4 ti 30p ml I ,yep �Iu� iii' JII w'Plp'4"1114 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 25 1 If" a City of Port Aransas Expansive Soils Hazard SISSISSIMI**I( SSSV\4 AIM Ongoing 111114 ASS% Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) \ I \ 1 � 1 \ I 1 1 10�011001o0a 11071 0a1v0 oua»i�al»i au 7 o011»a 0 o00v 001�0���»�as laa,l l0� �� \\ lall\ \ \\»111\111\\\ 111» \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 l �» T l \ 1\ 01001\0110\1\11101101110011111 P R 1 \1 1\ � \111 � n, n��� � n 1 1 » � pp�� 1110110�� 1 »i 71111 71111110�a� \ 1�0� 1a7 00� 1000\00 » uau 1a v Illllalll lol 1�001�011001o0a 11 1 \\ 011\\ \ \ 111 1\1\1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 11 1 I \ ex ti ti W 101/7100 aa1» lual 7aw1»iail 00 a \\0 \10 01� 11011 »I »ial 7aw1»iai 00 a \0a \\110\1 \\»\ »I »ial 7aw1»iail lu 0 7�\ 171 1a111o11 »I »ial 7aw1»iai � 0 0 n, 1 11\lllq 1 1 1117 »11 \ \111\111 l 1 »11 11\l\\11 l 1 111N »11 11111111 l 1 U�\ V „ 1 0 � 1 ) � 1 1 » 1 1 1 1 0 b � a �� » � 0 � 1 � 1 � 1 1 `�� 1 `»� 1 �1111�11111�11���11�\1111111\�������1��1�1�����1`��11�\�1���``II�, ��1��»7,1,��11�,�,�7»,�„»�I„»,�,�»��1»1��»N�i�1��11��1 ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��„m�l�»�i�l,����1„»,�,I�»�»»����,i��71���,�,������ ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��1�»�„1�,��11�,�,��7»�,»�1,,,»,�,�»i�71���,»�������1��1 ��1�1\1,,�\�1�1� �»�„�,�i�l,�,�„�1�„»�,»�,,,»»��,hl�»����,tis11 ��1�\»1101 LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $774,547,600 100% 499 100% $414,531,200 100% $0 $0 $0 $774,547,600 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 6,501 94% 0 $0 0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 422 6% 0 $0 0 499 $414,531,200 6,923 » » 111 \\ 11\0\\\\1111 1»1111@11111171111 11111111111111111 111111111IV1111� »1 \111111111111111@1111111 I \ 1 1 111 1 1 \ 1 1 1 p � 1 V� �� � I 171 »� ��0�11���1�1��1����1�������������������������������������������������������������������������, 1„»I,,,�,»���,,,�„7»�„��1„»,1�,11��, 7,,,,�,�7,,�,��»,���„ � �17„1,�,»,1,�„���,1���1„����„�,���11�10����1��1��1��1����������������������������������������������������������������������������� „��,\,,,»» »I�7»,771711111,\�„� �,1,,,�1,,,,,,,�11»111»ll �I1111»I�II�I ,lllll�,,,�,��,\��,1»» „1 » 111„ »1\,, .111.1 111 � 11 1 1 n »» ��1�11�01�11�01�0�1��1��`������������������������������������������������,»,»„7�»„� �I�»,�»„»�»,��Il�,�l,,,»,�„�»,7,�,1,,,»�»,��I1�1��,7�1,111,,,»,� »11� »„7�1�»�� „�„1»„7,x,11»�1���,,,�� ��,,,»,�1,,,»��011011111101111���1�1`������������������������������������������������� minln�1 ,.4 x`1 � �1 `11"��������� 111 1�1 1111�1�"”` 1 �r r � r r � » r ��� `II5V 1 LOW FIRE STATION SCHOOL Port Aransas Fire Department Port Aransas ISD Port Aransas HS Port Aransas ISD Olsen EL Port Aransas ISD Brundrett Middle Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 26 1 If” ,u L Figure 14-12. Soil Expansibility for City of Port Aransas 11111111111111111 a 14pooneorx,��,. 4,* coopty Fr$31,abon Act orp Pawn Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 27 1 P a d' a City of Robstown Expansive Soils Hazard ssssssslm\ "ssss .1\MV \ ASSI Ongoing MISS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) » I�ol \\\\» 11111 u�i1i111u all \\\�\�� »o\ »o\\»\\�o» nl \ \ \ \ 1 1 I � �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\��,,,,a„�,�a„�,���n,,,, �,,,�„�,,,ILII„a�l�,�,,,���,,;��i�l�,ii �,�,���1�����\�1�\�1��������������������������������������������������������������������� »\ »\\\\\\,\ ,17,71�allla7 ll�,\„�„\ »,aa �� ��I ����,,, »,1��\,\»�\,,,»,\»�,\„ »», �,1�111�„111 ,\„\\,» »»»,a,��„�\,,,,»» a�a,,,,� »„\\ »»„�a,�,,,,�»„»\»»„� \ \,,,111 \\ \ 111,1, 7„\ »1 , ,,,� 1, 11�\�\,,, \\ , \ 1 , , I ; 1 1 v 1 \ 1� � n�1 1 u \� �0�1\1�1�1�1���������1�����������\�����\����\����\����\����\����\����\�,,,,,,,�11„��„���1„�„�,,,�,,,�r„�;,,,�1,�,,,,��,,,�,�,,,,��„X111,�,��,,,,�1�„��nl�„I�1�11„�„�al���,�i�,��i�„11„�,,,�„�„„�„��„N��,�,���111„�„�„�a,�,li�, ��,�,�,,,��„�„�,�\„�1��„X11,��1,,,��„Nlm�a„�,��„�I�I��„�ii��„ �1�11�1�1�1�1���1�1����`������������������������������������������� \, ,all, \ \\\»,1,,,,,\» 1,1a \ » » 1 1 » \ 1 11 1 » p�� � ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\����,,,�II1�,,,,,,�,,;�,1�1,,,1,,,�,��,�,,,,�„��n1�1��1„����,�,��I�a„��111111111ti1�1�1111�����������`������������� ��10\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\��,,,,,,�I,,,,,,,,�a,��l,,,�,�„SII,,,�„�,,,,,,�,,,N�1�,,,,,,�,,,,,�,;,,,�����1�1�1�11111\\1��1�01���1�����������\� 1111\110��1 of a ���� la ��� »10�a� \ »0� laa ����� goo»\»o of u� au �a y ati��a��� �o� �oo»o� goo»\»o 11 1 \\ oll\\ \ \ 1 11 0\\\\ 1 » u , 1 , 1 \ 1 \ 1 11 1 1 � � 1 1 \ � � V 171 Y��� � .V � 171 ex �IY� �IY� u 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�`��ow711��n1111�o��7ouia1lo��0��`�1�1������������������ 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`�\����1171II����i��ol�llil�o��i�l�iu�i171111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111... 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`�\��`�`�io111u�01111io��17o��i��o��ii�����`����������������� 11»111`��`�`�`��`�`����nt1\1II����o�o�ll��`�`�`���`� ��\1111 1`1 a a W ao 171 »» ���\\ 111 ulal 7awl7iail ao a »1 \10 0l� 11011 »i aial 7awl7iai ao a laa o» o» »0» »i aial 7awl7iail lu \� 7�\ 171 \a111o» »i aial 7awl7iai � ao u n, \ 11\111 q 1 1 111N 111 \ \111\111 1 1 111 11\\\\ 11 1 1 111N a�\ .11111111 1 1 111 „ 1 0 7 1 1 7 1 1 » 1 7 � 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 � b 17 a 171 7- 1v �1111�11111�11���11�11111�1111�������1��1�1�����1`�\11�1�1���``11�, ��1��„7,1,��11�,�,X71,�„1�7,,,,�,�„��1,1��„N�i\1��11��1 ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��„mll�„ill,����la„�„�I,�,,,,����,i��71���,�,������ ��1�0\V,1�1��11�� ��1�„�„1�,��11�,�,��11,�,1�1,,,,,,�,�„i��71���,,,�������1��1 ��1�0\1,,�\�1�1�\„�„�,�i��,�,�„�1�,1,�,1�,,,,,,,��,h��1����,tis111 ��1�0\V,1�1��11 LOW MODERATE $5,571,100 HIGH $8,007,900 100% VERY HIGH $169,866,500 TOTAL $183,445,500 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 $0 0% 0 0% $0 0% 18 0% 37 $1,953,000 1,084 32 100% $634,900 100% 2,027 100% 634 $148,802,500 7,109 703 $151,390,400 10,238 11 111 0\ \0\\\\1 111111»111111111 1110111\101 �\1111\1111111 1111111111111111111111 \\11111.1\ l I�1111111 \ 11 \ 1 1 i ,,,11,»I�I»�,1�7,11111,,,1,1„� �,1,,,1,,,,,,,,»,»,,,»II �I1111»711» 11,,,,,,», X1111111,11„1,,,,,,,,,,1, „1.»I, 1„»1,,,.111.1 11,.1.„ 1 \1 1 n 1 ��1�11�01�11�01�0�1��1��`��������������,,,x,»,�7�`�,»771»�1»111,�17�1,1�„77, „��„777,�,,,77�,»111,�,1��,1��,11,»,7,u,�,`�,,,771,��7�1�7�,,,,77�„II,»�,I��»��,�„1»al»,7»�����������������`�`������������������������������������� 1119 » 17 \\ N1`.\\'\ ��\ VERY HIGH EOC SCHOOL Robstown Emergency Operations Center Robstown ISD Robstown HS Robstown ISD Seale JH Robstown ISD Hattie Martin Early Childhood Center Robstown ISD Solomon P Ortiz Int Robstown ISD Lotspeich EL Robstown ISD Robert Driscoll Jr EL Robstown ISD San Pedro EL Robstown ISD Salazar Crossroads Academy Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 28 1 P a L Figure 14-13. Soil Expansibility for City of Robstown lilll�',oIl"'I'IlNm11111I" lj 111111111111 111 1 ul1 IIII Ib1�101111' uIlm,Ip,p,, Il141d pp 01d1fl�11111111111 ,III IIII 1111III�Ilppgp,11�I11V1111�'' 1`����?` fl�IL!GIIIIIII�11 111111 111111111111111111111 u1111d�011111V gJllll� 011110111111111111111111111V11111SNI 1111 111111100000000000000 MMMMMMMMuMHI uluuu 111 1111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 111111111111111111 1111111111 i 11111001/ 1� u��w'1'1'1 11IIIIIVIVIIIVIVd"' "MNlllllllllfllll�1111111 1001010111111110001000,00,01 pulIIlyI'l�11�II 11 ouh'w "uIlail I luJ ») ll hII IIId111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 111 111 1,l1 1111)0 IIIY'1111111111i 1 1 1 111111 1.1 III" I�IIIIIIIfI �I 1lldllldd 111100000000,11,111111111110111111111111 X11 �rIIIII '11,!0v11 1 1I111119ii�111,II1,II,d,F1�1l1`IId' I1l'1i11 111,1^�1''d'1��I1',1I h11l„'iiIl'IiilIi4191�V���I�I("1II0dp�u 4l�1h,II I1I v.II h,dllbIN IIIIOY 1111I11 vv"„ V Ip0 III 10 IIIIIIIII II 10/Ifl 0�1 1N 110 9Vd'IM �11 Ilt�,110 0111^ IIII IIII"1' 1111 00"0"010101111111111111111111111,101011001".111I111111 ll 01111 lull l ;l �1i1�' Till Ilgl IIY11) i 1fl, ql IIm00v;0 I I II IjGN�qBIII N0g' 1I1II1 I1Ii,dy1'il'�1ryNV�I1ri�IIlppI110!1`1llQ1111liI11''I�Il'"N 111d�„ ''' 1iI11d,I-,11I �1 II�11I II0I11 I�V1IR, V`III ''1111:11 1rII,IIu'IIIil��If1iN1111111 liI1"l"l II�i'' ,1IlVY loI1(1I�IQI11 11111111111111 1111111 1411011 vvv,111 ' I �1P I I 111irI(dpI1 ,, IIIIti 111111I',,11u0 01VGpd, 1y ,1,1ll',I1j,IiII'I,1i11PI�11V Vpi111l'1111IIIl�0`II11 ,I",IIIII�D,^��y0 1@II11'III I IIGAIlj" 1,1 ��v�IIx lIIl�IIiI,IlII1 I11I 'd�011�lIli0�`N I11l' I10 111N,0�1'lu0VI lL11[1:01:1 ,111,0p� 1111I� l�1'111111IdU 041 00 u111I11 01 1 ^III I hll� 1 I�11 I , 1 1 IIIIIIII 11 1 III 1111111111111II 1I�1o1 1,1 in II III ,11 r1h11� 0O0 IoI°I0t�"0 I1I1 11u I1rI1Iu!iYu�111I I 11,Iy11lI Il aud 11ydII 0N„� 1'NV I 11„Ii� 1II 100 110 oo llll lllll, 111111 ,1,11,1),1 1 11 � 1111 11 1 1 lP 11 11 11cIi m1II 1u11111u011lIlllllllilllulum1l11P 11II II1 V1III Ill 1111111111111111111 NWIV 1f"IlI11111101,'„ I11II'1dII Illlll11VlIill11 01,1 11111 11 11 I;1I,, I� 1II1ill TN M''sr1 •001, ,01Co1�'11,011ys;ban IF"'Wirt '6„0„A ILA porembdte 1111 111141111111 an 00 041 0014 11' 00 0000000000 00 1111111111 II 11IiIIliidl 11111111111111, hlN11'1I111111111'11„11111111110111,„110101„11iIiI i 1�1111111111 I11 111% 0GI'illail 01111110 Io111/00100 0IIGI1111�11l fl11 , v111V 0010,0411111111 010 0 1011111 1111111 1'1 "111111011,11111111011111111,11111,11111"0""1""! vvol0ulillllll 1 IIII nll 11111 ))))11:1VVVVVVV11111111111i'NIII III ;41191I' �III'i11111111Q'0,11,11IIW1II 1Nluuuuuu 19VIII , ,VI 111111111111111111111111111 10111111111111111111111110011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100 Mol uu 0!!1„1. i11V1 11 111111111 111111111111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 11111 iilw�� pIIIIIIIIIIIIIl1111111111111111111 11111 mpIN "'1dajIIpMN�m. "I,fl!i"�II1I�� IIIIIIrvUIi I, 1.19!11I III 1, 11 Iii; s V�41 NGI II ��IY 0mII V0� „10 vv� w1w111w111w11111v11 1w111111111111 111 e am M M1p I10I!III u 1111 'IVal I pIII 1„ ''' II "'' 1111111111111111111 „vv vi I I, 11111,11v,111011 111 NI '1111.11.111:1111111111.110.1 11IIII 11111 0 ... ' 0 m 100„„u�1.1 11111111111111111111111111 Ivivoloolov 11111111101010101010101011111111111111111111111111111 10011 mw14000111100.10011 ��� IflflVlilaul l ���� Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 14 29 111111, ,u 0v„11 7;' Port of Corpus Christi Authority Expansive Soils Hazard sssssss\m\A""sss SSW ASS% Ongoing SSSSV 6\ \ MSS Ongoing and likely increasing (see Table 14-3) oo\o »� 1» 1u�»iuuuu ul lui�u lulu ulv7la»gal i 1 1 1 1 1 1 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\�,,,��I,,,�;��,���1„�,,,�»,�„�`1„�»,X111,�»„����,»,�,�»�����,�����������\�\������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\����\���� \\\, »,\,,,,1» »� »I �»��,��„ ,11,,,,,,�,� \\,,,» „�» \,,,,,\,,,,,11,1111111,1,»w,»1,111,,,,, �,,,, ,»,» 1» ,,,,,,,111»I�III��I,,,»„»»»I ,1„�\„�,\\„\,,,,,,,"�,,,,,,,�,\„�,,,»,,,,, „�� ».1 „, \\,\\ 1111,. ,” ,,,1a ,, „\\��,,,„ , 1 11 11 \\ \ � 1„n, 0\1\1�1�1�1�\�������������������\������\����\����\����\����\����\�����,»,,,,�„�„�»�»��1„�h,�»„�„���I,��,���»„��,,�,�»„�, n,���,,,,�„»�„���,��11��,�»,�„�`l,�»�i��,tis�,111,�»„�„�11`�,�»��„��nl,�,�l��l�, �„�»,��,,,����s��»���,��,�»„�1,�»„�,���,,,���I�„��,��I,»„�,�„���I�,,,�»�»N��,�ii�,���1�11�1�1����\�1�1�`�`�`������������������������������������� \„ ,x1111 7y,11,1,,,,,\\,,1,1a \1 1 1 \��11�\I��1��1��1 ��111���111, 1 \ 1 111„ 1 » 1 � �� n, �� �� �,, a,�llll ” � � �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1����������������\„��1�1„�»,1»;�,»11„1,,,�,»�,�»„1„��n,�1i�„�i��,�,��„,,,,��1�1�111�1�1�1�1������������������������ �1��1\1\1��1�1�\��1�1����������������\���,»„�11,,,,�»1„�`1„��,1„���1,���1»„�1,�,��1,,1�,»,�,1,1,�,�1�,,����1��������1��1�0�1�`�`�������������\��� 1\11111��� 1 a u�l�»�a� uluuuuu �o lu man �U uuuuun �»� luuli�u\I \\o�u\I�oa 11 1 1111 1 sl 111\\ �� � u l l la \ 1 1 1 \ 5 l 1 1 J \\ � U 1 ` � 171. �. �....V 171. �w,l i i m IY swam=1111111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`���111�11�aio�o�ll��i��»o��o��i171111111,1,1,"1�1��� 1111111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`�\�������» i@lll�»o���lu»o��,l»o�i�,1�`�1��1�`��`�1�`�� 1111111111`�`�`�`�`�`�`�\�����ofl111�11iio��u���11�1���iii�����oa�`������\����`�`�1 e t t 111111111 1» �n11111 111111 116wu17111 Ilo 6 taint \\0 X1111111 111111 116wu1711 Ilo 6 1111 1111 \» �n11111 111111 116wu17111 Ilo 6 TEM \\0 X1111111 111111 116wu1711 � ��� » n, 11/11/11 I t 1117 \ Olp 11\111 q 1 t Olp \ 11111111 I t 1117 Olp 11\111 q 1 t 1\1 ( U 1 0 ( ( U ( U 1 0 1 � 1 � ��1�1,�01111 �»�„„�i�1,���117„�,»�1„»„��,h��»1���,tis11 ��1�1,�011� ��1�0„��7�»��1„�1,17,�»„�11,»,�,»1„��n,�1��1„������������ ��1�1,�011� �»�„„�i�1,���117„�,»�1„»„��,h��»1���,tis111 ��1�0\1\1�1,���11�11�1�1�111 LOW $0 0 $96,761,800 56% MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH TOTAL $0 0 so $0 $0 $0 *Rounded to nearest $100.00 919 51 0 $71,545,000 44% 3,642 88% 0 $5,719,900 2,971 0 $174,026,700 7,583 12% Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 30 1 P a L Figure 14-11. Soil Expansibility for Port of Corpus Christi Authority f!a!^1V)1yli bf i it in fri 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 000000111111111110 �flil�awm�iii n"41xxol�ay tyr1000 1i,rrcmsa'diiaX,k,s 1x1X gla:414 Mii7igp uaxmroan,Ar,,Mm;'ra'rSSURGO Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 14 31 1 IIP a d' e ofta 111 1111IIIII111111111111111 111111 III 1111 1 �nirrr 'art' prr Dam and Levee Failure Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 12 City of Agua Dulce Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Bishop Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Petronila Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Port Aransas Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 City of Robstown Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 17 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 18 Dam and Levee Failure Hazard Overview Description A dam is a barrier that is constructed to hold back water. A dam failure is a systematic failure of a dam structure resulting in the uncontrolled release of water, often resulting in floods that could exceed the 100 -year flood plain boundaries.1 A levee is an embankment built to prevent overflow from a body of water. A levee failure is when a levee embankment fails, or is intentionally breached, causing the previously contained water to flood the land behind the levee. Location Dams There are six dams located within Nueces County as indicated in Tale 15-1, Table 15-2 and Figure 15-1. Locations impacted by dam failure are the areas downstream from the dams. These areas can expect a degree of inundation from flood waters, depending upon the severity of the dam failure. It is also possible that some areas upstream will be impacted by receding water levels, though these impacts are not likely to be damaging. Opportunities for recreation, irrigation, and industrial use may be reduced if reservoir water levels fall beneath their normal levels. There is a general data deficiency for these small dams. Dam -specific inundation maps do not exist for these dams. This data deficiency includes extent. Without inundation 1 The State of Texas Mitigation Plan, Updated 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 1 1 Ii" ,n maps, extent cannot be measured. Actions to correct these data deficiencies are proposed in Section 19. Nueces County Table 15-1. List of Dams by Jurisdiction SaSSIZIM MIS .1%\..\\‘‘.\\. 1 Belvy Lake Dam 2 Chapman Ranch Lake Dam 3 Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam 4 Barney M Davis Cooling Reservoir Dam Corpus Christi 5 Calallen Reservoir Dam 6 Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 2 1 P a Table 15-2. List of Dams Located within Nueces County* I' g11�1111 11\11\\; \11 IL it O O O O O a vco -Q '0 .5 '0 .5 '0 N -- a) a) a) a) a) Q X N a z z z z z N N 72 c N U Q L O (6 Q .� Q . Q > > Uao J CSU ,a 8 W 00 — E 7)s- 0_(, ai COLgV .� N- _ O CO ' o 1 O 2CL co N— co co M1a a, s o * o o) o) v X zb'D a c o 9 al 0 C 0 0 E X W al w L > 2 E �1 (0 Z * Z Z Z u til O ;moo LoTsLoTsLoTsLoTs�C LU w w w �v= a 2 8 ti CO CO N 0) 0) CO Earth Controlled o a p 7. aJ z o 0© CO O V `71N I� 8 O — '77, Q p T6E Oi N l0 8 O L X ij v _ O p O. u 5 3 0 LO CV CO 0 3 0 o co o co o c z ib (0 oN CV v I� Cb Ln CO I� -00 a N p N N N N N © s E E E O O W E N Y gs (6 (>6 NscD O p O O C C p (� a) �_ O O a) o O. O O a) U Z N N (� SC) O E 0 L 8 a a 8 L v u a > O O v E c N Q c 0 iv (T)2 2 LL a cm cm _ 0 ce 0 o a z z a` 0) c 3 0 QJ = 9 9 a = E J J J J J J COp 5 -6 W W En co p O K a OO _ O ac pw U L E u 2 54 4 coo > m , >7E ii a J•5 ro Q o Q c CC Y CC Cg E a) E '2 J N U v N E O E (6 E lo 'is) -LE Y O[ 8 i N O 07 (� 8 07 00 CJJ V L F z O O N co V LO c0 Vt at Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 3 1 If" a Figure 15-1: Map of Dams Located within Nueces County 140111441100410 11111111 dMm11111111 DIflIIGP;„;,6. 111111111 IIII1U M�' Nhv ° ro rol1111 o l v �'Biu uil';ssonrysirirts11I �qYr Ila I SII �a�.�,l �YItlUNw'r411�w r' wuWuw ,fir„i�.. aurtaill m1911�riNI,uIIAp v Irl �Iv, w � � �wal i�� „ x ilw..111114111'1'111'°1111111;114'Y w,°l114' tlz IN I a�1 fgd fel Mpl ��a�d aril uu as ilk s ji i,l11114giliiilfiilll 44444441,4441, I1444", 41G r4',WI0C,, '4« 44'44`4,34441 440114Nur ,call,wx,Mr,.;�,sa p1tlaza,vrp 044414 ,414 11v444404,4 Note, the City of Corpus Christi owns and operates two other dams and water supply system located outside of Nueces County. These two dams are the primary water sources for all of the jurisdictions within Nueces County, and provide supplementary water to other counties surrounding Nueces County. These water sources are the Lake Corpus Christi Dam, Choke Canyon Dam, and a water supply system that transports water from Lake Texana and the Colorado River called the Mary Rhodes Pipeline. Failure of the dams and pipeline systems, including their various support systems (ex., pump stations, reservoirs, etc.), would have a major impact, particularly if the failure occurred during a prolonged drought. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 4 1 IIS ,n d' e Levees Texas does not maintain a database of levees, however the US Army Corps of Engineers does maintain a national levee database but it is not an inclusive list. A search of the national database does not identify any levees within Nueces County; however, there are numerous levees owned and maintained by the City of Corpus Christi, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, and various refineries and industries. For example, the City of Corpus Christi owns and maintains the Salt Flats Levee and the Port/Museum Flood Wall which are part of the City's downtown flood protection system (Figure 15-2). The Port of Corpus Christi Authority also has a number of levees. In addition, many of the refineries and industries have constructed levees around their facilities, primarily to contain potential spills, but these levees may also provide some level of protection from hurricane surge waters. 1 IP Lime Figure 15-2. Salt Flats Levee Flood Protection System APPPP fiz k i • M scum FdYirfl 1111111111111111111 1000000000011111111 trot) SPOOK err Kinney Simi Pump t Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 5 1 P a Extent The Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (FEMA publication No. 333, dated April 2004) provides guidelines for determining the potential hazard classification for dams with "the understanding that the failure of any dam or water -retaining structure, no matter how small, could represent a danger to the downstream life and property." The guideline establishes three classification levels of Low, Significant and High as indicated in Table 15-3. . A31\1\rpr\A . Low Significant High Table 15-3: Dam Hazard Classifications 1111•1111None ExpectedPossible, but not expectedProbable. One or more expected rx,x,,,Arr,)%,111.„131,1,1,1111' Low and generally limited to owner Yes Yes (but not necessary for this classification) The Texas Emergency Action Planning website indicates that in 2005 the Texas attorney general ruled that dam hazard classifications are exempt from disclosure under the state's Public Information Act due to Homeland Security concerns. Dam failures can occur as a collapse or breach of the structure. Dam failures my result from one or more of the following conditions: • Long periods of rainfall and flooding; • Insufficient spillway capacity, resulting in embankment overtopping; • Internal erosion caused by leaking or piping; • Cathodic corrosion of concrete reinforcement; • Maintenance problems, including failures in debris removal, repairs, or gate and valve maintenance; • Poor design or construction; • Dam failure upstream inundating the downstream dam; • Erosion caused by wind -driven waves; • Intentional sabotage; • Land subsidence; or • Earthquakes. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 6 1 P a A levee is a manmade embankment or structure built along a river, sea or other body of water to protect the adjacent land from flooding. A levee failure is the systematic failure of the levee structure or levee system resulting in the uncontrolled release of water. The more common causes of levee failure include: • Overtopping; • Erosion; • Structural Instability; • Piping/under seepage; or • Settlement.2 There is no state inspection or safety program, and there is no database for levee systems in Texas3. FEMA requires that a levees be certified to meet federal design, construction, maintenance and operation standards to adequately reduce the risk of flooding from a major flood. A general data deficiency exists for levee hazards. Levee -specific inundation maps and extent data do not exist. Actions are proposed in Section 19 to correct this data deficiency. When this data deficiency is corrected, clearly defined location and extent data can be incorporated into future planning efforts. The State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan (updated 2013) indicates that the "extent for dam inundation is recorded in terms of the area impacted by the number of feet of water and documentation of what is vulnerable and the loss that can occur." The State plan also indicates that "profiling dam failure continues to be problematic for local mitigation planners. Mitigation's focus is not on the technical failure of a dam from any particular cause, but on the flood inundation area if there is a breach. The location of the flooding impact is a difficult measurement to identify and many planners express frustration over unavailability of access to dam emergency action plans that may provide the information they need. A 2005 opinion from the Texas Attorney General Office restricts access to those documents for security reasons. TCEQ supports the decision but will continue to work with local emergency management to share information whenever possible." Occurrences Dam Failures No previous occurrences of dam failure for dams located within any of the jurisdictions is known. However, as noted earlier, the City of Corpus Christi owns and operates two dams located outside of Nueces County. One of these dams, formerly named the La Fruta Dam, previously failed in 1930, but it was subsequently replaced with the Wesley Seale Dam on Lake Corpus Christi located at the intersection of San Patricio, Jim Wells 2 Congressional Briefing, FEMA, July 2013 3 The State of Texas Mitigation Plan, 2013 Update Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 7 1 P a and Live Oak counties near the City of Mathis. The La Fruta dam was used to maintain a water source for the City of Corpus Christi. While the failure did not kill any humans, the loss of the dam represented the destruction of a $2.7 million investment. The city defaulted on the bonds used to fund the construction of the dam4. Levee Failures There is not a comprehensive database with records of levee failures. Levee repair and maintenance is on-going and costly. For example, in 2012 the US Army Corps of Engineers recommended spending $3.2M to repair levees located north of the Harbor Causeway (Hwy181) on the east side of the Inner Harbor adjacent to Nueces Bay (see Figure 15-3). These levee had been damages by a storm events and wave action which is a common contributor to levee failure. lam LoIIG1l tton of h'R 'v'ea ,II:i arnagetd by st anuaI+ that the US r l:'my Corps of Engin,' ir"s'. ,ecca.t urnea"rded spending 2M to it,ap'sr'6r'in; 'mt Figure 15-3: Location of Proposed Levee Repair Ism �wll'"�Yl�''IVG!Qnl4h"fllrip� yilYtl���ll' i, ChriStif Channel ri„^..+,. r real nwr,;� http://archive.caller.com/columnists/murphy-givens/mary-sutherland-la-fruta-and-coopers-alley-Ofed4b83-ad4d- 4460-e053-0100007f4e7b-359987491.html Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 8 1 P ,n d' e Probability Dam Failures There is no history of failures for any of the dams located within Nueces County. It is assumed that a dam failure within Nueces County is unlikely within the next 10 years. Levee Failures The probability of a levee failure is possible within the next 5 years based on the history of levee failures due to storm events and wave action since the CEPRA 2015 report indicates that three hurricanes impact the Texas coast every four years, and since the annual probability of a hurricane, tropical storm or tropical depression striking Nueces County is 6.9% as indicated in Section 5 — Hurricane & Tropical Storm of this plan. In addition, the minutes for the August 26, 2015, Corpus Christi Local Levee Partnership (LLPT) indicates that the City of Bishop levee and the City of Corpus Christi's Salt Flats levee system are not certified by FEMA which may indicate a greater risk for failure if these levees do not meet FEMA standards. Impact Dam Failures Dams provide benefits in the form of water for recreation, irrigation, human consumption (after treatment), industrial use, flood control, and hydroelectric power. Most dams contain relatively small volumes of water and do not pose a severe threat to downstream communities, however, a failure of a large dam could be catastrophic. It is assumed that all six of the dams located in Nueces County have a "Low" hazard classification based on the size, type and location of dams indicated in Figure 15-3 and Figure 15-4. A search for data on these dams resulted in the limited information contained in Figure 15-3. The six dams are relatively small and are located in rural or semi -rural areas of the County and City of Corpus Christi, with little to no residential or commercial development downstream of the dams so no loss of life is expected. Impacts would be limited to the dam itself and minimal damage to crops and the environment. Based on this limited data and assumed "Low" hazard classifications the impact of a dam failure in Nueces County is assumed to be low. If Unincorporated Nueces County or Corpus Christi dams were to fail, impacts are expected to be restricted to surrounding riparian corridors, agricultural areas, and to the dams themselves. Higher capacity dams with more vulnerable assets downstream of Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 9 1 P a them might cause power outages, destroy large areas of cropland, damage residential property, and displace vulnerable populations. However, due to the capacities, locations, and development surrounding the dams profiled in this Plan, these impacts are not anticipated in Nueces County. Levee Failures Failure of the City of Corpus Christi's Salt Flats levee during a 100 -year flood event would expose the City's Downtown district (see Figure 15-4) to flooding that might result in property damage and possible injury or loss of life. All of the property located in the Downtown flood zone represents roughly $1.1B. Levee failure in Corpus Christi could have significant impacts. Levee failure during a flood event could potentially lead to the inundation of the City's downtown areas. Power and other utility services could be interrupted. Commercial property could be flooded, leading to direct damages and indirect economic impacts over time. While the downtown area of Corpus Christi is not a major residential area, there are still residential property found in the area. Damage to this residential property will lead to displaced populations. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 10 1 P a Figure 15-4: Map of the Downtown Corpus Christi - 100 -year Flood Zone hatalb Field lean Ater Ni t, nu a„ oliVaai00! 4400.41, arotrratima rcr trtor,09,2t1: grP;Atoloon.ite50113 00„01,), take Failure of the levees adjacent to Nueces Bay would result in flooding of the area the levee was intended to protect, which may damage property but may also result in environmental damage if materials stored behind the levees were to erode into the bay. Vulnerability A March 21, 2016, newspaper article in the Corpus Christi Caller -Times indicates that Corpus Christi's downtown is located in a 100 -year floodplain and the existing Downtown Flood Protection System does not meet current standards for protection from a 100 -year event due to the uncertified Salt Flats Levee system. FEMA requires that all components of the levee be certified as "a freeboard deficient reach" which means that it is not vulnerable to a catastrophic failure. The article indicates a report prepared by one of the City's consultants indicates it would cost between $75M and $100M to overhaul the Downtown Flood Protection System to meet a 100 -year event. Vulnerability to dam failure has been examined by looking at the length of highway and railroad infrastructure downstream from the dams. There is a general data deficiency for these small dams. Dam -specific inundation maps do not exist for these dams. Consequently, it is difficult to develop a detailed vulnerability profile. Actions to correct these data deficiencies are proposed in Section 19. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 11 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levee Failure Hazard , \11111111X1111�1�11�1���1�����1\��1\����������������������������� I,�,�,����,,,�,�,�,�,M���\1\0111\0\01\�\�\0\01`���1`���1\���\����0�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ See Map mtiu , , ti1V , ,.. \ 11\111\11�1`�11�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�„�,,,����„����„����„�,�,Ih,,��,�,���„�,��,,,�ia�h,�,,,�„�,,,�„�,,,���1�1\110��1�`�1��1��`\\1\�����\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ No historical dam failures No levees present �\\\1\1\111\\1111\11111111111111\1�11�11\��1���������������������������������`�,� ,,��I,����� ��„�„���1�„� Dam failure — damage to dam and agricultural areas Levee failure — no levees present 1\1\11�11111111�1�111�1��1t„;';;''°';momtrmommm,,rm���11111111�1�1111111��1��1��1 Low 11\111\11�1`1111\�1������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\°;;„°"1;;°?';1';121�1�11�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\1��������0\�\�\�\0 Dam Failure: 1% annual chance in next 10 years 1\1\111111X111111111111111111\��1����������������������°;la,,l';11 �°;l�m;°n'°;; ;"",,111;;'r\1111\111111111\\\����\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�0 No major road way, no major highways in downstream from dams Despite the efforts of the planning team, inundation maps for the dams of Unincorporated Nueces County were not available. The dams in Unincorporated Nueces County, Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam and Chapman Ranch Lake Dam, are in relatively remote areas of the county. Failure of these dams is not expected to endanger critical facilities. Expected damages are restricted to nearby riparian corridors, agricultural areas, and the dams themselves. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 12 1 P a Figure 15-5. Unincorporated Nueces County Dam and Levees 0010000010000„„Hrl uu:: ��1UVU��II�!:.'�'i�hlPflioAaJllfl�' gyp.:' �4�V�ti mukom 11,11111,1,1 ;wluNni'!ivw:udl ��I idVifpl+i�; koI m4x00:: $40;roti, I 014,01(Y Dorn "nil Le:00 s Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 13 1 IIP a d' e City of Agua Dulce Dam and Levee Failure Hazard , , 11ii o00 alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� ai0o\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aa0la�ooaoal0a0�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111•VIII 1i01110a1�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111001 aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Bishop Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 111 1 1111 1 11 \ , 111110111 ala 111�o�o�'t\�\oa\»\ aaaaloloaaalaoala\\aaaa�o x111 ala aaaloaooa\oaolla111aalllllula,11aa1 111111u1111111111111111111111111I111alalaa�aa\ oo� aalaaaao0 o\ooaaal u1\lo\o>tolalll\,I�a1111a1111111 aolaalal aaaaa�aa\ \ �1�111 1y 1�\ 1111111/ \11 11 LII11� \ 1\\00 � 1111...\ � ti � 11 � 11 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\����l���,�`�1���1�,��������,�,���1���,��`�1������11,���,��\�,��,�I,��,�����;���1��,��1�,�1„'�� „������1,�����,�1�������1 �1��1,�������,��,�c11�,,�,�,���,��������\�,��1���������1��������������������� The City of Bishop has at least one levee, according to minutes from the Corpus Christi Local Levee Partnership (LLPT, August 26, 2015). Mapping of the existing levee not available. While the City of Bishop has this levee, it was determined through the risk assessment that the failure of this levee would not impact the jurisdiction. City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 1�11111\1\11�1�11�1�1��\�1�������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�EMMI��1�1X11111\101\\\1�1�01`��11��������1�\��0�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ See Map mtiu , , I1V , ,.. 11\111\1\11�1�11�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�„�,,,����„����„����„�,�,Ih,,�I,�,���„�,��,,,�ia�h,�,,,�„�,,,�„�,,,���1�1\110��1�`�1��1���\1\�����\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ No historical dam failures Levee repairs recommended in 2012 v� \�\�1\1\1\\\�1�\1�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\1„ll�„�I„��i,���„��,,,�1�,�„��1�„��1�\1�1�111\�1\1\111\�11��1\����\�������������������������������������� Dam failure — damage to dam and agricultural areas Levee failure — damage to downtown Corpus Christi 11\111\11�1�11�1�11�1�\�1��1���,,,,";;,'I''m:,,,ICu,,,iiT,rjm,ll'�iil�u";I,m u;;n1y„11,e�11\11�11�0�1011�001�0�������� Low 11\111\1\11�1�1111\�1������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�1°;;I „°"',;i';;°?';1';;»EP�111�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\1��������0\�\�\�\0 Dam Failure: 1% annual chance in next 10 years Levee failures: 5% annual chance in next 5 years 11\111\1\11�1�1111\�1������\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ Erin�11;,�;;;?�A°1111�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\1��1������10\�\�\SIM 2.5 Miles of highway downstream of dams 0.6 Miles of railroad downstream of dams $757,124,377 in improved property behind levees The dam located in central Corpus Christi is the Oso Beach Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam. The dam is an earthen construction dam. The body of water produced by the dam is a decorative feature of a municipal golf course, also used for irrigation. The dam has a maximum capacity of 58 acre feet with an average capacity of 29 acre feet. A roughly 0.2 - mile -wide riparian corridor extends from the dam to Oso bay. Should the dam fail, this corridor would be expected to convey water from the dam to the bay. No structures exist within the riparian corridor. Damages from the failure of Oso Beach Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam are expected to be restricted to ecological damage to the riparian corridor and the dam itself. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 14 1 If" ,n The dam in the north western portion of Corpus Christi is the Calallen Reservoir Dam. The dam is a rock fill gravity dam. The dam is 195 wide, six feet high, and has a maximum capacity of 1,275 acre feet. Average capacity is 1,175 acre feet. The areas of Nueces County downstream of the Calallen Reservoir Dam are occupied by riparian corridors and open parkland. Residential, water -front development begins about two miles downstream from the dam. These properties are not expected to be impacted by failure of Calallen Reservoir Dam. The damages from a failure of Calallen reservoir dam are expected to be limited to ecological damage riparian corridors, minor damage to park benches or pavilions, and damage to the dam itself. Some portions of Interstate Highway 37 run parallel to the riparian corridor downstream of Calallen reservoir. While this length of highway is listed as a potential vulnerable asset in the jurisdictional table, it is not expected to be destroyed in a dam failure event. The location of the levee system protecting downtown Corpus Christi is shown in Figure 15-2. Downtown Corpus Christi and two of the City's Pump Stations are protected by the levee system. A levee failure would threaten the area bounded by the three levees. Approximately $757 million in improved property is protected by the levees. A failure of the levee system would threaten this property. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 15 1 P a Figure 15-6. City of Corpus Christi Dam and Levees 100010 11111111111111 d1 • !upoV4pd„ Vuf ;I fr;Wq,rl^rrp; 1N,ko: w:: s d;w amiry y PY''vilt • 4401 4a,140c.wtaa6' P4ldmx.awirt9 N�RNIp �a,aFUrc,aw Awltilv,t14 P111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 16 1 IIS ,n d' e City of Driscoll Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 11ii o11u alp III�ol000xalx�a� xiao\xoxoal�laaxx11110 ��� ala xxa11�o11oal uaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII uil 111aal�aaaaao\ o0o xoai� o0 o�xxoal � 011 aiu 111 liiluuiiluli 1111 out aal Ix�a�\o1o1 \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 1110111011.111111.1111ulllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Petronila Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 11ii o11u ala Ill�o�0000aao\a\ xiao\xoxoal�laaxx11110 aaa aia aaalalooaool aaala Illalallal 11111111111111111 VIII Ills 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 ooala o0 o�xxoal a o11 aiu lii liiluuiiluli liil out aal laaaa\oaol \ 100111 .011\ \0\\1 11101111111.111111.111 1uII111g1110 1 \\1111.0\0 .1111.111100..1 1 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,���1,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`�11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������11,���1����� a,1„��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Port Aransas Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 11111x111 ala lll�a�aaaxaax\a\ ala\al�laaaala\a������» �II� aal aaal�laa�alala111aa111111a11aa11111111111111111111111 I11I1I111alalaa�a�\ ��� „Illaa� �\aaaaal a ��1111I11111111�I1111�111111 a1aa1111 laaaa\���\ 111x111 11\\ 1 � \ \\ 11�01111111111i111 u„ lull liI1i11i � \ »\111. o\0 1I 11 I Ili X11 , \ This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. City of Robstown Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 1111 xxx ala lll�a�aaaxxxx\a\ ala\al�laaaalala������» �II� aa1 aaal�laa�alala111aa111111a11aa11111111111111111111111 I11I1I111alalaa�a�\ ��� „Illaa� �\aaaaal a ��1111I11111111�I1111�111111 a1aa1111 laaaa\���\ 1 111x111 11\\ 1 x \ \\ 11�01111111111i111 u„ lull lil lilli � \ »\111. o\o II 11.1 I li xx , \ 1� 1 1 1.1. 1 � 1 � 1 1 � � 1 �. ����10�1��10�1���1����1����\���,���1,��`��,����1,�,1����1�,�,���\1����,��������1�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;� ��11�,��,�`��,� ��1�\�,������1��1��������1�� 1,�����11\,���1�����a,1„��,����,���,�,������,���,�1����� ��0�01������1�����1����������� This jurisdiction does not contain regulated dams or levees. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 15 17 1P a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levee Failure Hazard 1�11111\11�1�11�1�1��\�1������� MEEM��1�11111�1�0\\\\1�1X01`��11���������\��0�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ See Map » , ore ,o, u�,»u»ii,aaa�„ »„» »»,i m,� iii, 4� mtiu „ 1V , ... X11111111\11\1111111`\11�11�1�\�1�1��1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�,,,,�,,,,��,,,���,,,���,,,��,�,II„��,�,��„��„�,,,�ia�h,�,,,�„�,,,��„�,,,�1�1111�1�`1111�1�111�1�`11�1�1�1����������������������������������� No dams in jurisdiction Levee repairs recommended in 2012 v� \�\�1\�1\\\�1�\1�1�11�1�\�1���1����\������\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�„ll�„�I„��i,���„��,,,�1�,�„��1�„��1�\\�1�111\�1\\\1�1\\�1\��\\��`I Levee failure — damage to downtown southeastern portion of jurisdiction 11\11�1\11�1�11�1�11�1�\�1aa�1���,,,,";'11ii°,":a,,,ICu,,,,'�°;;n; Jl,ll' �iili� u�";I,m im�11\11�11�0�1011�001�0�������� Low 11\111\11�1�1111\�1������\������\\\\\\\�\�\�\�\�\°�;;'r«»""',;,i`;;°MIE��"\111\1\\1������1\\\�0�\\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ Levee failure: 5% annual chance in next 5 years 11\111\11�1�11�11�\�1������\������\ \ \\\\\\\\\°;Ian„lEIZI,�111�1�11�0111�0�1�0�\ 1��' ������ 0\�\�\�\0� �\ $85,613,053 in improved property behind levees Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 18 1 P a Figure 15-8. Port of Corpus Christi Authority Dam and Levees 111,141,1101 x41 P44,84114111 044ffilatraylaa Niutx4r$ d:',ov� �rg NJt+"Bp4'hialbil'ulmndX IhNPo'7�T�� tags 7i 'u 015.0wC" P'1 n/ Dor44 Jed 14,4e44e444f Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 15 19 1 P ,n 444 m 01101,4 lrrar rpt/1r�-p 111111111 '1111117!Iril$111 111111 11 111111111 111' tHHHHHH 1 S1111111111111111-111111111 1!f11111' Ill 111111 1111 111' 111111 III Land Subsidence Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Land Subsidence Hazard 6 City of Agua Dulce Land Subsidence Hazard 7 City of Bishop Land Subsidence Hazard 8 City of Corpus Christi Land Subsidence Hazard 9 City of Driscoll Land Subsidence Hazard 11 City of Petronila Land Subsidence Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Land Subsidence Hazard 13 City of Robstown Land Subsidence Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Land Subsidence Hazard 15 Land Subsidence Hazard Overview Description Land subsidence is the decrease in the lands surface elevation due to the loss of subsurface support. Land subsidence can be caused by both natural processes and manmade actions. Land subsidence caused by natural processes typically occurs over a long period of time, usually thousands to millions of years. Short-term land subsidence is generally the result of manmade actions such as: excessive ground -water withdrawal, oil and gas drilling, mining operations, collapse of buried infrastructure like pipelines for water, sewer and storm or the leakage of underground pipes that erode adjacent soils. Subsidence from groundwater withdrawal and oil and gas production usually occur over large areas, while subsidence from collapsed or leaking pipelines is generally localized. Location Nueces County is one of the Texas coastal counties at high risk for land subsidences. Figure 16-1 illustrates the areas with the greatest land subsidence potential in Nueces County according to subsidence data from the 2015 Preliminary Flood Insurance Study for Nueces County. There are a total of eight areas within the county which have records of historic land subsidence; Areas No. 2 through No. 8 are no longer active. The only area of active subsidence identified within the county extent is the Saxet Oil and Gas Field, and is located within the City of Corpus Christi; this is shown at Area No. 1. 1 The 2013 State of Texas Mitigation Plan identified Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 1 1 Ii" ,n Figure 16-1. Map of Subsidence Areas in Nueces County u® 1 011 1,1,1,11'11 11111111110 1111111 1,P„, I11ioomu i,, 111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111,11111. +!!!!!! Illlpii Yiliiijj • 1111111 O.,.4" ya?N;palaro NOON, , Pt rx poi of NoNN Otrodone:N m�eunnm lm a lwwnulrlu uolwlx, 111,1 1,1 f1,114,0 ^+W, 11111,0,0„ry 14+.m*d 1141114;14 11. Extent Land subsidence extent is determined by the decrease in the lands surface elevation measured in feet. Figure 16-2 includes benchmarks, denoted with an "X", which indicate areas currently being observed for potential land subsidence. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 2 1 P Figure 16-2. Map of Historic Subsidence Areas in Nueces County Duict' IT 'II I ma, d�,mm nw imms m��pW:r ��u � * i x d 4 40 A !' irmepum e�xmar « mwaArMr��riw� mnxmrw�np rew4w+.'NdL'�!Nh: 4 iw iM'wb:I 11,1 Im."'. li;:i imam"Imlmtifdm ilNp1N4' 014144 wmi ill*, rim, 0401t V0a'400***411.14 0,4 OOP Wid400 *OW UN MY 1011plUM w w om N uVu a uu aao uu ti u: a oo1imou RE ICS ���0CT VE 13 m � C4V& Ote yiG lid] p12Jl525no'y F1524 2UU19410-m nCe' tuyy,dat01 Via ,y 15, NI OP ILLS, Source m xlpn pn00 Obi ibt Tem r ma m� moon Wwwwl w, A4100t040 8000000— 0„ W"4 w104404 O''44 4404$0,. 1 toupvoopo od � vo`acp'h { N r 4pI "wod f W,� m�l7rn� Or IP' Figures 16-1 and 16-2 depict areas of both active and inactive subsidence. The City of Petronila has not experienced active subsidence since 1980. Subsidence is not expected to occur in that area in the next five years. These maps indicate active subsidence only for Nueces County, the City of Corpus Christi, and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. Occurrences Land subsidence in Nueces County has been historically associated with ground -water withdrawal and oil and gas production. Seven areas of historical subsidence can be seen in Figures 16-1 and 16-2. The greatest period of subsidence in Nueces County took place Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 3 1 P a y from 1942-1975. The greatest loss of elevation experienced in Nueces County, a loss of 5.28 ft., is indicated as the Area of Active Subsidence in Figures 16-1 and 16-2. This area corresponds to the location of the Saxet Oil and Gas Field, suggesting that the subsidence experienced in this area is a result of the removal of subterranean oil, gas, and ground water. Probability Unlike other natural hazards that take place as discreet, acute events, land subsidence is a more chronic hazard. A probability presented in terms of the expected number of events per year is not an appropriate method of analysis for land subsidence. An area is either experiencing land subsidence or not. The probability of an area experiencing land subsidence is dependent upon a number of factors. Oil and gas extraction activity appears to be associated with subsidence in the area. The State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Action Plan reports that land subsidence is generally viewed to be an unlikely event, with one event possible in the next 10 years. The 2012 Coastal Bend Mitigation Action Plan, which includes Nueces County, reports that land subsidence "has been reviewed and is not widespread." Based upon these reports, with the exception of the area of active subsidence around the Saxet Oil and Gas field, a new land subsidence event is expected no more frequently than once every ten years for all participating jurisdictions. Impact Land subsidence in coastal areas can have significant environmental and socio-economic impacts. Land subsidence can cause structural damage to building and transportation systems such as roads and rail; damage buried infrastructure such as pipelines; cause sea level rise along the coast which increases vulnerability of coastal wetlands and beaches to coastal erosion and increased flooding. The impacts of land subsidence can be measured in terms of property damage. Vulnerability Land subsidence can damage vulnerable assets by causing damage to buildings, transportation infrastructure and buried pipelines. Vulnerability is included in the jurisdictional tables as a function of property value and critical assets contained within the areas of subsidence. Land subsidence, and the decrease in elevation associated with it has the potential to increase vulnerability by the following mechanisms: • Increase saltwater inundation in coastal areas • Increase the frequency of flooding • Increase in the extent of flooding Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 4 1 P a • Damage to fixed infrastructure • Losses to submerged aquatic vegetation • Changes to gradients in drainage channels, leading to channel erosion and sediment deposition In addition to direct impacts like damages to infrastructure, land subsidence may increase the impacts of flooding hazards. Impacts from flooding hazards are discussed in Section 6. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 5 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Land Subsidence Hazard 1 1 1\ �111\110\1\111\1��1�1�11�1������\�\������1„�,,,,�„�„�,���,�1�,��„���,,�„�,�„��,���I,�,I�,,�„�,�„�„�,��11�11�1111X10111�1�1�`��`�`������\. 111UIti1111 \ 001101111\1W».111\1\1\II \ 11111114dlllllll\I\111 111 \ 1 1 111111`1�`�`�`�`1�`�`�`�`����`�������on�,�a„»d�lluo��ou,�u,�i,���o,���1111�1111�11������������������ 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 5 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 6 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 7 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 1918-1951,1942-1975 Subsidence cluster 8 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 00 0�\ll lle»> Ilii li�l�i\��1111i��a1 »� \o\\�\\ool l�olll�\�il�\\ \\I 5 \ 1 � 1 Q ��1��1�10��1���1�1��������������\������������������������������������������������������������������,»,»,,,1�»„�,,,�`�»,�»„»�»,`��,,,»�11„»,�1„»�I��„����,,,���1�1�1�0�01�01�01�����������������\������\����������������������������������������������������������� ��1��1�11�1��0���1�10�1����������\������`��»�\„»�,�I���\„»�»�,»�„��\,,,�\,,��,1,�,\,,,��010011111`�1��`�`�`������������������\�����\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\��\ \ .Ill\ 17� u ��1��1��1��1�01��\���������������\����������,»,,,�,»,»�„�»��1»�»,����»,,�»�1,,,�,��»„yll”��1�1��1��1��1��\�1������������\����������� ��1�1��1��1��1��1�01��\���������������\����������»,`�`»;\„»�»„�„�,,,�,,,,,»„�„�,���,»,�,�,»„�1�1�1�1�0�1��1��1��\�1������������\���������� $2,282,722 $9,293,714 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 16 6 1P a City of Agua Dulce Land Subsidence Hazard 11ii o11ii alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� aiao\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aaala�ooaoal aaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII liil 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111 oal aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 7 1 If" a City of Bishop Land Subsidence Hazard 11ii o11ii alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� aiao\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aaala�ooaoal aaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII liil 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111 oal aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 81 If" a City of Corpus Christi Land Subsidence Hazard �� „\111,,,,,,,,,�,�1���1„��111„1,11„�,,, 1�11,,a1,11,111,11 �� 11 11 .1.1....1.... 1 ��������������������������������������������1,,,,1,��,1,,'��,1,,,��,1,��,1,1`I1�1,�1�1,,,,1;�1,�`�„��1,1,,,,,�„1,,,������`����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 11,11 11 ,,, 1111111 �1„ 1 11 �1 1 1 Ilu�o» I�a�olo��a.11ll0l 11�11��11„11~,11`1 1111 11111111111 1 .1111 1 nt11111”�`�`1�1����`�`��`����`�������lao�w�11,�����,i�11����1�11,1�,�������������������������� nt11111"�`�`1�1����`�`��`����`�������� ���1,0���,���i���",��i�,�l����`�la���`��1��`�`1������`������`��������� nt11111”�`�`1�1����`�`��`����`�,�ao�i�1,��,���11a��i����`1����1�11��1���1�������������� 1918 — 1951, 1942 - 1975 Subsidence cluster 2 (see Fig. 16-1) 5.28 feet (1942 — 1975) Unreported 1918 — 1951, 1942 - 1975 Subsidence cluster 4 (see Fig. 16-1) Unreported 00\\0\ \\�\\001�011�111�1141111 Q \ 1 `11�1�111.11111111�11 � 1�,>,��11���������iit\\1�1,11�,1.11111111�11 � �><���,1111� ,11�11 11�1�11�, 11V1�11 111 ��„�� 11 1 11 11 1 1 � 1 10 ����� ,,,,., f ., ,,,,., u r o ,, a ,,,,., 1 i I1xxss11��111�i �t���u���n 11fl�fl�� 1 1 r , .,������������ �����11��1��111�IIn��,,,���1�������������� 1917 1942 4.05 25 0.162 1942 1950 1.10 8 0.138 1951 1959 1.76 8 0.220 1960 1975 2.00 15 0.133 2 1942 1975 5.28 33 0.160 3 1917 1975 9.33 58 0.161 4 2017 2022 0.80 5 0.161 5 calculated 1 1 1 Geothermal Resources of the Texas Gulf Coast Environmental Concerns Arising from the Production and Disposal of Geothermal Waters, by the Bureau of Economic Development, dated 1976 2 Land -surface subsidence in the Texas coastal region, by the USGS Report No. 80-969, dated 1980 3 Report No. 272 dated November 1982, titled ”Land -Surface Subsidence in the Texas Coastal Region” by the Texas Department of Water Resources 4 The Impact of Global Warming on Texas: Second Edition, by Jurgen Schmandt, et al, 2011 5 Forecasted amount of land subsidence using the average rate fron 1917 to 1975, based on FEMA's 2015 preliminary Flood Insurance Study indicating subsidence is currently occuring and should be anticipated. \\\\\\1 111111111111111111 MIME \11111.1\ l 1 5 � 1 ���\������01���������\�����������������,,,�,1�„�,,,1„�,,,1`�„1„�`���,1,1,,,�,111„�1��1,���,1,���0��\��01�0�0��1�1�������1��������������������������������������������������������������������� 111,E \ 1111 1111 \ 1 \111 \ 1 ��\1\\��0\1111�\!1111�1 11111011111 1111 ��) 111. � (11 � 1 1 t 1 �� 1 1 111�01�11��10�1����������������������������������������������������������� 11„,1,,,1„ I1,,,,1���,,,„,1,„,,,�1,,,,1,,,�,,„��1,�1,,,1„111110�01�111`101�`�������������������������������������������������������� 1,��>,�1�111>t,1,1"1.�� ���\1.1,1�11,1,1�,�1 11�111 � �� 11.11 11 ��11 1111111111�1�1�1�1�11�1�01�11�\���������������\����������,,,,,,�1,,,��„�„�„,�„�,,,�`��,,,�„,,,,�,�,,,,y,, X0111111111�1�1�1�1�11�1�01�11�\���������������\���������������,,,III���,,,,,�„�,��,,,,�,��,,,,�„���,,„�,,,,y1�1�111111111�1��1�1�1�1�11���`�������������\���������������� $2,752,155,876 $448,772,256 SSS\\,1„11:1,iu tt ,00,�31,��o�a„,��\��o,� 1�1 01� ��1�,. ��.. \1WS UAW i`� 111�11011111�101�11�0�%1��\� 1 Fire Station School Fire Station 9 - 501 Navigation Blvd. Corpus Christi, Tx 78408 Corpus Christi Isd Gibson EI Corpus Christi Isd Harold T Branch Academy For Career & Techn Tuloso-Midway Isd Tuloso-Midway Academic Career Center West Oso Isd Kennedy EI Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 9 1 If” a West Oso Isd West Oso EI West Oso Isd West Oso H S EOC Nueces County Emergency Operations Center Fire Station Fire Station 3 - 1401 Morgan Avenue Corpus Christi, Tx 78404 Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi 2 Hospital Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi Shoreline Dubuis Hospital Of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Isd Coles H S And Educational Center School Corpus Christi Isd Evans Ses *Reference Figure 16-1 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 10 1 P a City of Driscoll Land Subsidence Hazard 111 1 111 1 � 1 1 11111111111111111111111\1111111111 1111111111111�111�1111\111��11\•101111111111111111111�I�O11011��1111111111111 11111111111111111111100011011111111111111111•01111111111110 0100�1�1 11101110 01111��111�1111111011111011111�110�11 1111110 10 � 1 011111111...1111 11 01..1111.\\ 1 11..1.00 1 111 1 1 1 � 1 0 1 \ � 1 1 1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1�,����,��i�����1�,������1�1�„�,��1�„���,� ��\1������,�����,���,�1�������0,�;�`���,1�,��,�,�,����1���,�,�,�����1`I�`�����01����,���������,���,���,,������,���,����,��1�,� 1����� �� �1�10��1������������������ There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan -Section 16 11 1P a City of Petronila Land Subsidence Hazard of Doll alp ooiio�oo��o�11i 0\�\0�1���`I�oo�o�����\ �\� „1,,,1„1 alloy`o�o`I���1�»�Illa illllol�l �o` ��1,10���001,11,11111�11111 1111111111111111 Ill 1lllll�ll,,,ul, 111 olll alll �`���\o�ol1111011 ..01011. \ � \ \\ 11111111 111111/111 1111111111.00.. 1 1 1 11.,111 011 1 1\111. \ � 11 1 ( 1 1 1 \�0�1��10�10��1�0��100��11��1�,�1���, ��,����,����,��,����,1��1� ��������,�c�111�,�� ��„����>>������`0�,1��`�1��,��,���1��,�����,��,����,�11��`���1 ��,��„��`��1�,��,���,��,����1������ �\�����1����\����������� There are no records of subsidence after 1980 in the City of Petronila. Land subsidence is not expected to impact this jurisdiction and will not be profiled in this plan. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 12 1 If” a City of Port Aransas Land Subsidence Hazard �i 01111 iii lil\�o�0000��0\�\ �i�o\ao�o�l���\������o �\o �` 000\�loo� oo� ia�l� 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII 111111111`I���a���1 �o� �>titil�\ `o o���oal o\�ol�lo �I lol�lllllull 11110111 a� 1����\u�ol 1 11111111 ..011\ \0\\1 01�`11�1111111111111 1�II111III11� 1 1\1110\\ .1111.1 III0111� 1 111( \ (1 1 � � \ 1 1 0\1��1����1����1�����00���,�1,�,��\��,�,�����1�„����1���„�,���,������1�,�11�,���������,�������1��,�����1�,�����1,�"���������,���11„1��������11�� 1��1������\�,�o\�`��11��\�������1���,����1„����� ��������������1��������1����������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 13 1 If” a City of Robstown Land Subsidence Hazard 11ii o11ii alp Ill�o�0000aao�a� aiao\aoaoa\�laaaaaaa�o ��� ala aaala�ooaoal aaa�a 111ti1�11�,1 11111111111111111 VIII liil 111aal�aaaaao\ o00 000i� o0 o�oaoal � ool ails 111 liiluliiiluli 1111 oal aal la�a�\oaol \ 1110111 .011\\0\\1 11101111111.111111.1111alllllg111� 1\\1111.0\� .1111.1 III 01111 1� 1 � 11 1 1 I 0\1��1����1����1�����00���1\��,����,��`��'����1,�,�������,�,���\\����,��������1,�,���\�,�\�,�\�,���������,�;�`��11�,��,����,� ��1�\�,��,���,�1��1��������1��1,������1\,�������1�a,,,,��,����,����,���1,��,���,�1����� ����1��1������0���������������� There are no records of historic or active land subsidence within this jurisdiction. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan—Section 16 14 1P a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Land Subsidence Hazard �1 1 1\ E,, a E, �\11\110\1\1�1�1��1�1�1�1������\�\��,»,»,»�1,�,»,�,,�,»,�,I,�,»,�,�„fi�l,�,»��I,,�»,�,»�„��11»��C\,,»,�»,�,»,��1`1�1�\0\1�1�1��������������\�\���\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\ ,,, ,,, ,,,,,,, 111UIti1111 \ 001101111\1W4.111\1\1\II \\11V�111111111\111 41 11 \11\1\ 1111 .1111 1 E tlll\`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`����`��������\�����������»��a��»w���»��»���II»����II���»�������I1t11,""`1�`�`�`�\�`�`�������������\��������� tlll\`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`����`��������\���»��������m���»��»��„i���V�1Nm��1111111�1„1�1�1�������������������\������ 1942 — Present Subsidence cluster 1 (see Fig. 16-1) 5.28 feet (1942 — 1975) 0\0\1 11111111111111141111411111111\111111�1111111111111� 5 1 \ 1 \\�01�1\\\0�1�\������������ 1\,1\,,,\\,,,\ \,,,,\\,\„"�„\\,�1,\\,,x,11\\1�1\��\\'11�1�\1�01S�\��\SS0��SS��������� 4 ,� \�\ „4 1114,11. l \ \111 \\'1�11�����11� 1�1 1����1 �11111� .�11� 1 1 111�01�11110�\\�����������„141,\,,\���,,,,,,\\„\,,'�1\,,,\„\,��\�1\,,„\,1�10�1�`1�1"�������������� $41,969,347* *property within subsidence zone 1. Properties within subsidence zone 1 include AEP Texas Central Company, Buckeye Texas Processing, Bucky's Navigation Inc, City of Corpus Christi, Coastal States Petroleum, Crossbridge LLC, Driscoll Foundation et al, Longhorn Transfer and Storage, M&G Resins USA LLC, Nueces County Navigation District, Port of Corpus Christi Authority, Union Pacific Railroad, and Valero Refining. The properties are generally industrial facilities with roles in shipping or the hydrocarbon petrochemical processing industry. Land subsidence is most likely to damage these facilities by damaging below -ground or transportation infrastructure. Land subsidence is not likely to directly impact populations. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority does not have resident populations. However, PCCA is a major employer in the area. Fortunately, in comparison with other natural hazards, the impacts of land subsidence are comparatively slow -acting. Land subsidence is not expected to represent an acute hazard to people or property. Chronic impacts from land subsidence, if they disrupt production or shipping activity in these facilities, may cause economic disturbances in the community. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 16 15 1 Ii” ,n 11111 17111 III III 11111111111 Ul III 1111111 11111'111M III III Wildfire Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Wildfire Hazard 8 City of Agua Dulce Wildfire Hazard 10 City of Bishop Wildfire Hazard 12 City of Corpus Christi Wildfire Hazard 14 City of Driscoll Wildfire Hazard 16 City of Petronila Wildfire Hazard 18 City of Port Aransas Wildfire Hazard 20 City of Robstown Wildfire Hazard 22 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Wildfire Hazard 24 Wildfire Hazard Overview Description A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire almost exclusively fueled by natural vegetative fuels. Fuel may come in the form of grass, brush, or tress. Wildfire risk increases with high concentrations of connected fuels. Meteorological conditions such as high temperatures, low humidity, droughts, and high wind can also increase wildfire risk. Humans are the most common source of initial ignition in wildfires. Sparks from agricultural, industrial, or automobile activity may start a wildfire. Additional information regarding wildfire can be found in the 2011 Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Location Wildfires are most common in areas where wildland and urban areas abut, known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The areas of Nueces County that feature WUI are the most vulnerable to wildfire. The urban centers of communities lack the concentrations of fuels required to feed wildfires. The rural areas of the planning area lack the degree of human activity that is associated with ignition. Areas where human activity takes place and fuel concentrations and connectivity are sufficient to fuel wildfire are the areas where wildfires are most likely. Extent Risk to wildfire can be measured by using the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI). KBDI relates weather conditions and expected, potential fire behavior. KBDI is based upon daily water balance, precipitation, and soil moisture. KBDI ranges from 0 to 800. A KBDI score Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 1 1 If" ,n of 0 indicates no water depletion, while a score of 800 represents absolutely dry conditions. Table 17-1. KBDI scores correspond to potential fire behavior as follows 0 - 200 Soil moisture and large class fuel moistures are high and do not contribute much to fire intensity. Typical of early spring following winter precipitation. 200 — 400 Fuels are beginning to dry and contribute to wildfire intensity. Heavier fuels will still not readily ignite and burn. This is often seen in late spring or early summer. 400 — 600 Lower litter and duff layers contribute to fire intensity and will burn actively. Wildfire intensity begins to increase significantly. Larger fuels could burn or smolder for several days. This is often seen in late summer and early fall. 600 — 800 Often associated with more severe drought with increased wildfire occurrence. Intense, deep -burning fires with extreme intensities can be expected. Live fuels can also be expected to burn actively at these levels Nueces County has an average KBDI of 64. The maximum KBDI experienced by Nueces County is 264. The minimum KBDI experienced by Nueces County is 7. This is a generally low to moderate level of risk. Because KBDI indicates current conditions, care should be taken to ensure that current KBDI is examined to determine risk. Droughts or extreme weather conditions may drive KBDI up or down in a short time. Historically, the largest fires in the planning area (excluding controlled, fuel -management burns) are about 1,000 acres in area. In the future, the worst that is expected to occur in any participating jurisdiction is a fire size of 1,000 acres. Some of the smaller jurisdictions are not much larger than 1,000 acres in total area. It is doubtful that they would ever experience a wildfire that completely encompasses the jurisdiction. However, they could still experience a 1,000 -acre wildfire that crosses jurisdictional boundaries. Extent may also be examined in terms of fire intensity. Table 17-2 provides the Texas Forest Service Fire Intensity Rating. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 2 1 P a Table 17-2 — Texas Forest Service Fire Intensity Rating 1111211IIS.. r.;;, ,��a� ar u. mi Very small, discontinuous flames, usually less than 1 foot in length; very low rate of Very Low spread; no spotting. Fires are typically easy to suppress by firefighters with basic training and nonspecialized equipment. Small flames, usually less than two feet long; small amount of very short range spotting Low possible. Fires are easy to suppress by trained firefighters with protective equipment and specialized tools. Flames up to 8 feet in length; short-range spotting is possible. Trained firefighters will find these fires difficult to suppress without support from aircraft or engines, but dozer and plows are generally effective. Increasing potential for harm or damage to life and property. Large Flames, up to 30 feet in length; short-range spotting common; medium range spotting possible. Direct attack by trained firefighters, engines, and dozers is generally ineffective, indirect attack may be effective. Significant potential for harm or damage to life and property Very large flames up to 150 feet in length; profuse short-range spotting, frequent long range spotting; strong fire -induced winds. Indirect attack marginally effective at the head of the fire. Great potential for harm or damage to life and property. Moderate High Very High For future planning purposes, all jurisdictions can expect to experience a fire of Moderate intensity on the Texas Forest Service Fire Intensity rating. Occurrences Records from the Texas Forest Service (TFS) from January 2005 to November 2015, the range of dates for which spatial wildfire data is provided, Nueces County experienced 25 wildfires greater or equal to 10 acres, 9 wildfires greater or equal to 100 acres, resulting in a total burned area of 6,345 acres. TFS records indicate that fireworks are the most common known cause of fires in Nueces County, causing 12 fires. Smoking, debris burning, and equipment and motor vehicle operation are the next most common causes of fires in Nueces County, each causing ten fires in the ten year period. A plurality of fires have unknown sources of ignition. Records of occurrence for each jurisdiction are provided in the jurisdictional tables. A number of other data sources report a wide range of wildfire occurrences. National Climate Data Center (NCDC) records indicate that three wildfires in Nueces County in 2011 and 2013 had a combined damage total of $260,000. No other damages were reported. Data from the State Fire Marshall indicate that Nueces County experienced 4,105 "outdoor and other" fire events from 2006 — 2010. Online archives of the Corpus Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 31Page Christi Caller Times from 1998 — 2004 indicate that Corpus Christi experienced 13 fires, Nueces County experienced two fires, and Bishop experienced one fire. Due to the wide ranging variability in wildfire data, the data provided by the Texas Forest Service is used to calculate jurisdiction -specific hazard probability. This dataset is the only dataset is the most detailed and therefore most suited for analysis at the municipal level. Table 17-3 Historical Wildfire Occurrences (TFS and NCDC records) * \St \ 1/1/2012 1/3/2012 1/16/2012 2/2/2012 3/28/2012 7/18/2012 7/31/2012 8/26/2012 9/3/2012 9/3/2012 9/10/2012 9/12/2012 9/13/2012 10/12/2012 10/26/2012 11/20/2012 11/24/2012 12/20/2012 2/13/2013 2/25/2013 2/25/2013 2/27/2013 3/4/2013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 5.00 15.00 0.25 10.00 10.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 40.00 0.25 1.00 0.10 0.50 0.10 \\tAt Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Brush pile burning Unknown Cause Power Lines Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Power Lines Power Lines Playing with Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown matches Cause Cause Cause Cause Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 4 1 P a Table 17-3 Historical Wildfire Occurrences (TFS and NCDC records) (cont.)* 3/11/2013 0.10 3/12/2013 0.10 3/24/2013 0.10 3/25/2013 Unspecified 8/5/2013 1.00 8/17/2013 0.25 8/23/2013 0.25 12/14/2013 800.00 1/15/2014 7.00 1/28/2014 0.25 2/14/2014 1.00 2/14/2014 1.00 1/15/2015 1.00 1/21/2015 0.20 2/19/2015 1.00 2/21/2015 0.10 6/15/2015 0.15 7/4/2015 1.00 7/12/2015 1.00 8/3/2015 1.00 8/9/2015 1.00 8/15/2015 1.00 8/30/2015 0.20 8/30/2015 0.50 9/12/2015 0.20 10/1/2015 1.00 11/9/2015 0.10 111 Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause High winds downed power lines Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Warming or cooking Playing with matches Warming or cooking Unknown Cause Fireworks Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Brush pile burning Unknown Cause Power Lines Brush pile burning Unknown Cause 11/21/2015 2.00 Warming or cooking *There are too many wildfire occurrences to list here; additional records from 2005 through 2011 are included as Appendix F Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 5 1 If" a Table 17-4 Historical Occurrences Listed in Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2009) Corpus Christi Fire Department Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Fire Department Nueces County Emergency Services Department 1 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 2 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 3 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 4 Nueces County Emergency Services Department 5 InalanaS 301 91 50 83 29 Port Aransas Fire Department 19 Robstown Fire Department 59 Refinery Terminal Fire Company Total recorded wildfire incidents 632 Probability Hazard probability or reoccurrence intervals are calculated based upon the number of historical events during the period of examination. For example, if four wildfires were to have taken place during a 50 year reporting period, the reoccurrence interval would be about 13 years, or an 8% annual chance of wildfire. Probabilities are shown below in the jurisdictional tables. Impact The impact of wildfire is described in terms of property exposure. Data from the Nueces County Appraisal District and the Texas A&M Forest Service are examined to determine residential and commercial property exposure to high wildfire risk areas. The Texas A&M Forest Service data are described in greater detail in the Vulnerability section. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 6 1 If" ,n Vulnerability Vulnerability and impact to wildfire is discussed in terms of asset exposure to "high" to "very high" wildfire threat. The wildfire threat data comes from the Texas A&M Forest Service and is a unitless index ranging from 1 to 7. The Forest Service assigns the qualitative descriptions of Low, Moderate, High, and Very High to index scores of 1, 3, 5, and 7, respectively. For the purposes of this analysis, assets in areas of wildfire threat index values 5, 6, and 7 are considered to be at risk. Only two of the assets described in Section 4 are located in high wildfire threat areas. The two assets are the Seashore Learning Center Charter School and Fire Station 16, both located in Corpus Christi. It should be noted that the wildfire threat index is a model. Wildfires have taken place outside of areas of high risk. Conversely, there are areas of high risk that have never experienced a wildfire. When interpreting wildfire risk exposure as described by the wildfire threat model, it is important to realize that no model will ever completely capture the variability of the real world. Pastoral and crop lands have the potential to be impacted by wildfire. Crops and pastures can become fuel for wildfires. Wildfires that do not pose a direct threat to human lives or safety can still be damaging due to their impacts on economies dependent upon crop or livestock production. The 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) dataset was used to calculate pasture and crop area by jurisdiction. The 2011 NLCD data, released in 2015, is the most up-to-date data of its type. Pasture and crop area, combined into the term "Agricultural Area," are outlined in the jurisdictional tables. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 7 1 P a Unincorporated Nueces County Wildfire Hazard \ 1 County Wide (Unincorporated) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 � utratazat01 uwnzzn� t ��� 111111�\ 11\\����11111111111111 1011 .1111111111�111�� 1\11 �� �1��� 11, �� 1 1� 1� 111111�����������������1�1��������� ������\\�1�����������������������,»�����\ Fireworks Smoking 6,345 3,000 Debris Burning tnttt%%%%M\IMZZIM%%%%%% 166 0 deaths, 0 injuries $260,000 ssastuntassal istamannatimissumnamass 1660% annual chance 1 fire every 22 days Ismaststants .................,....s:::::.............%\teumWiriMr itififis�fi�S�S����susa�s»s». n»�,;;s�ia�����fi�'s��S��. issmsztEr 11 0\ 1 11111 111 rixFunklicrayaal 1 \ �11 111 1 wannallettnri1111111 � 1111 �1 ( 1. �\� 111111/111111/1 ��\ \ 01 \10 11\ 0 11 � .� 1 00�\\ �1�� 1������11 1111111 � . �101.1111 \1101 .� `1 „���� 11111�111� 111 \������ � ��`���,�,�)„���11��������� „������,.0 V1���\��11��\�010\����0����\�11��i„i�1��1111�1\��\,1\��1��\�\�11111��,,\\„����11���0��1\�1���\1����1 ���1�`�1�����»��\1\�11��\,��1�1����\1�1��„���1���11�;����15,274 73.77% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 8 1 If” a Figure 17-1. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for Unincorporated Nueces County o111111yh,hll!11N yecwm,, couimy Man At1', n Pl: Fill* IL C11Calgcrriot)cuig Of* and 1F Cvi ft ;I,,wI11111(1OWbi 11"111,7,111"3"., uuuuuipuuuuh Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 9 1 P ,n d' e City of Agua Dulce Wildfire Hazard City Wide 0�1�1�1�1����1����������,�;;;,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �� » i` �� o� �t iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intrmartsii» n ��i� �� �»i�o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �1 1 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Farm Equipment Debris Burning 14 10 tnttt%%%%MIMEMZMSISS IEFEERSINEElgin 2 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 tassastatanssa...........................................................issumnamsss istamannatiam 20% annual chance 1 fire every 5 years sassautass issurnolass, nor/;,d,..issamairtmass.wartmal um= men= TIMMIR s 820 1.12% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 10 1 If” a Figure 17-2. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Agua Dulce III 11'11111 II 11'1'1111111 11111'1 11111'11 1111 1111111111111. '1'1111 111 11111111111111111111111II111111111111'111'1111 111 I II III III 'I (1 V1I I I I1i IiJi ul111111'I I I11101�011io " 11 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 1l 111111111111111111111 111 1 11+I11��I,I 1111 1 X 1111111 11 ,,,,1111111111111.111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIV i "1111 ullll�lu 1111!l,ll6il 11 11'.0„„(EEEEEEffEEEEEEEEE 1111111111111111 1111III111' 111!1 111111111M111rtllm1d�111'�i�:hgP1t1�111�%i11��I I„' �II111 7llllllllll� y11111110 1. m4. �IMoislllliplp 001 00100001 rrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii III u111uu1ui1X11uu111u1u11u11;,1°"VIIiVNillll 11 1Y1i119i11llI! H1�,II11111��,,,,,„„111Il)11111 10X1R1414 004. tAr110f (i 109 Yti i'aWwiniziPY,. Vmec, II 111II111I� IIS 111111111111 i1 °°11plui'�� �T101 p,Ip�;p'll.,lll..ul1lII1�l�1 1111 HI 100111nh 1,14 a+:°:ate A:ti t niy u ,Jua7r 011abanlal Hard IYtint1mc n Ac c n 'akar! 1i P"Rr , 41 d'ta 0trunniOricir- and direMdire TIras't”.crie N 0.1 II1IY,11)111�1liUr1////1�'�i'1�;1 111111'1' 11111,10,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)1 1;uYll Ii I I I,1„J„„„1, lo((�i1i� Ill(ILI l 1II, 1 11 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111 0101 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 11 1 P a d' e City of Bishop Wildfire Hazard 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\�������EME111111�1�\0\0�1�0�1�1�1�������������\����\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\ City Wide �� » i` �� o� �t i iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intalmnsii» n ��i� �� �»i�o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �11 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Smoking — 2 Landscaping Equipment - 1 2.5 2 tllt%%%%%EMZM%%%%% IEFEERSINENEgin 3 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 ilsssatnntasss...................................................isammemmasss istamannatiam 30% annual chance 1 fire every 40 months assastass sacrortzass astmcm nor/;,d,.. s isssmsmtnmssss Istmnis Intram Ittruturnemna 3,150 35.57% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 12 1 If” a Figure 17-3. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Bishop 1N � u11�111�1I Il pVI 0II IIII1I� 11;1111' Nj1I IWMNNINMNI IIJMI (IIIIIIII IIVIIVIAMVIV,IIIIIIIVVIINlVIIVIM 11 11111111111111111011111H" 1V1 � 1�II VIIIIIIIIIIIovvvvvvvvvii �IA,I1� �1pi�1iN';� 11�111i��1I WI�V1Ip1>lf�;Iuuc11www"1l 1� 11 111 IIAAIUPI I N'' I(' 111oI1I�II10 IIIIIIIIIlI''11I 'WII I W�1 11I I�1 W0 VAIII11Il1 �VI Il v�11111 I 11! 1111111111111 1111" Ill 10111 11 loo 111111+ 111111111:1111:1111111111 �II1^111i 11 1 1!1111 J 11111 1 1101 1111111111' Igo 1VLi 11111hIlIII111I 111V1111 00 11111111 111111 u1�t11oo�1l91u 1�II�IIililuiu 11111111,1110 1 Ili u1111II0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 NU�111 �jj11 111111111 ,ry rvww1 11111111111 II uYaI111p 1 7'11111111700011111111111111111111 pl IVji 1�uu i1gI 11 11�1 1'MN'IlNhW NN'1'ml 1m''1m'1N'1111N11 11111111111111701 k Yh0nnlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll111111 I�1IIIIIII111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII nIIIIIIIII 111 M 1111111 III ��� �� IIII VIII '11l II III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 1 I llll�i'lil II III 111111 I111I luuuuuum IIII ^ uuuuuuuuuuuu11111111°°°1111 1111 „,IIII �I1 11. N1 111111 111111.11uI�11u. u111_ 11111 01 11,11111111111111111111111111111111111111 071101101011101111110r, 01111111,110 01! 1 001111111 111111 1 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 m o111u '11 ii 111111117111-1 111 00101010100 11uii�IIW�WII�I�I��ll�1111 "II I� ' II iI eu1igiuli000”' �ry 1111111 11 I)JIIIt1U1vvvvoovc 1010101010101001010101010101010000000001000000000000000000000000000100000010000000000001010101111 41414114141414410110141414141444141414141414141111111111114141111 111144444404 1111111111111111111111111111111111 1ihl ��I'�IIiU�MINIIII�`11u11VN1,lUl�I)111 . 1nurtv.11Arv:a. rHrM9'A CN.klwfn7e,1 Nub ' FYuo wx 1 N1' �IIIIIIIIIIIIIgl1111111'IIIII�I��I�II Ile11 1111 �� "III����lu;l1 tvkvecea C uaaIrit ,^ 1;pr'a�d ��'A,a,'u1Atix° diiti ationAc ion n re''r �.�1:�C: il'{'ajr�!lipuvri,pAAFEN! �:m1,IC Vu'i1 dire TU'" amt Po m1 e;. , 111111111 �11 uuNulNelt�IU�v', JINIINNISNN NI N11111 ,. 017.1111111111117771 11111,11,11,111 1111 dIIdJ 1)11111 ilwwrvwlwlllll111111111117111111111 111,111,111,111,111,111 w."M'AN'MI'n8�II1YIIrvm"jll�'IIII�i�l��1''�IVllo�luj'il�l��� 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111000„001110 10101010101010101010101010101010101101010101010101010101010101001010101010101010100100101010101010110101010101100 Nm1111111Irv1Imm111rv1ImmrlrlrlrlrlrlrinnnnmmllrvlImmllmmlmollrvlIm11Nu l Y .71mr 7114INNT 1 107107.70.70,7 0117 17707 IMa� 7 1 �� 0077 W'„ryRm 1111 1111 NIIH°I,;'I Il 11 I �1 VIII III' n IIIIIIII II W 1� IIIIIIII X1,11 I" h N 111 y 11 pp 5S 11 �o I�IIIII�IOIIIIIIIIIIIII uuuuul8l�l�l���p ' 1111111 y�,,IIryry 0I0VvII u6116W V� yp ppryry 11V ' 011iIP u I I1i111�11�111111111111111111111111IuMIwie ( ((. 1i pN1iII111111111111111111111111111u U10100NI1111pXXhIuuIIIIII n1bYiy1. h„dul 11111111111111111111111111111 01010010100001010101000010101010000000000000000000000000000 1101111111111111111111111111711111111111110 11111111111001.00 1111 0010111 16, 1 0011100 70 1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 III 44 :44 4 4:: 4444440Illool010 1111111111111111 0101010010101010101010101111 1111111111111111111111111111111 11111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,„„ 1111111111111111111 1M11 M1 oI111uo11I11m1111 111111 111111111111111111111111171 u,1u11lu11u11u11u11u11u m1 11®11®1' I (IIII 1 11111111110 I loo,00o 11oo 1 Iw1111 1 11111111111111111uu1111u11u1 y1„ ' 111 I1IWWA111 1 I' 011 IIII 11 II111 1 lmNl 1 .... )IV 11111 11IIIIIII ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111 110 1 1 11 1111 111 701 11olool000moolloo1111 1111111111111111111 MN�uNM�MMIIMI 1m11N111wvvvvwulum 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIII Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 13 1 IP a ,11' ov11' City of Corpus Christi Wildfire Hazard City Wide u a� 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\���������,;;;;������»��,�;;;,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� , 00101 000 11 0\ 1\ \ 1 1��111 ��11110�� �1���1 ������ 111 11111 1011111 � 11 11111 1 10111 1 1 111 �1 1 1. ��������,,�»�„»»�i�»»�,�,»�,»��,»a„�»�»��,��,»a»����i���0�01��� ������������0�����y1�����1���������������������������‘11i164\1\1 Power Lines Children Playing with Matches 6,323 Other Incendiaries 1,000 IIIIIS%%%lttM%%%%%% 11111EMSIZEIFFEnitlarntal 182 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 nssssmm\\wnmnsss swermoranzasnmatinammals, 1820% annual chance 1 fire every 20 days St%%%%%%ZS%%%%% latallnirraniall=arrnal..........:........................ $124,962,516 $106,530,505 tsss\smdcnsss. stamsImmur tinatmarzumum 324,074 7.64% 12.44 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 14 1 If” a Figure 17-4. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Corpus Christi 416,1 eamellfitla 11111111111111111111111 1111111I tb i1VINWlIu 1111111111111 mYufruYYffllhl(IIIII�)! Newn,arm., kne. 1 A tY P R P'AIlecas, Ce my s,uY1u Yu,arr.^•tl,�o �, iaaP' Y*.t.int don Ran I 0dOwn; 9 . v. ,m�una Tarig,f1111. 11113 11111111111111111111 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 15 1 P ,n d' e City of Driscoll Wildfire Hazard 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\�������EME111111�1�\0\0�1�0�1�1�1�������������\����\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\ City Wide 0�1�1�1�1����1��������\�����������»��,�;;;,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\������� u a� �� » i` �� o� �t iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intrzmanii» n ��i� �� �»i� o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �1 1 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Smoking 1 1 IIISS%%%%11M11%%%%%% IEEEERSINEElgin i 1 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 Itntntlt%%% Intalr2211121MISSUMEMIMInal 10% annual chance 1 fire every 10 years stanstalssa astatormantasu astErnan max so so 111121111111121111113� 752 62.4% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 16 1 If” a Figure 17-5. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Driscoll Tonle 010.04 0001011111111 11001110 1111 111Q11 1uYI11 QNB 111'1001 (9III9111ult!I'181 V 1111111111 IyN��VV 01010011iiiIIIIIIIIII111110111111111, 0000 Jo 0101010101010101010111111101 »)0 H16 1111111111111111 11111 11 001..0 11 11 � IW�IIII 'l1 l I „ 1111111 pY ' 11 lu ql pp VWI II 1, , 111111111111111 11,100, , 1 ',I) 11 111111111H 4 111111111111111 1111111 1000111100001 000010,11110111110,0000,1011,11111101111000,0000000000,......." I� ptl 00 °ll 1i 111 �lmil 11110011010 0000111000000 44100000000000000000000000100000000010000 Iil ulIjIIIII IIII Ili', p1 11111111011 II11111111u,11,111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111a1 1111111111111100t000, 100000000000000000010010111°1111111111111111,11111111110111lI 1I l,' l " Billi10111110..0011itttttflttttttttttttttttttttttttttl II 4I�II�Ut�111rI1r1l�p,, . ipII1111111111�1PI11111111111111111111111111111g l'1°°"°°'°1111111!'1011'1011'1011'1011!!li1!11111111111111011:11:1111111W1°'°,1 011111111111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11110.0.11.1.01111 fl \IIII11:11 IIIIIIII111111110 1111111111111011111111111111 i Val „II I III"III 11111ll1111llllllllllllllllllllhl° /00 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110 l 111111111111 11111111111111,1111, u 11111111 a 111111114�1dlldll Ai° 10I111!'1 i111111 �, IIII IIII I I,jilp 11 (III (IIII I (111111111 111111111 i y,11 I11111111111 1111111111 lulNll0000lo� llo°ron 1li000 01 h 111 1111111IIIIllillllllllllllll .111111 I® 111q 11111111'1 1111111111111111111111111 0,11,11,,,l'1,0,0,101:0000,1,00,111',00101'0010001'001'11 yy 010 III 11111111 ����� 1111 i 1 un11111111111111111011111111 111,1101 illUr G'',4b4:k SYTNII, A1'^1idMf# 1 Ncwwpaart. Ilmrc-. ii.00e es 01,1rtuni0e M0,ffl 0.10.1-04110.,0414f 111110,40.00046" AIa:'N° a nA0:10evYY ?tar 1111 I 1111 000000 w 0000.0.00 1111001111 0111 ,111111011 11111111111111 1 11 11110111111111 001 110,00,0000,00„ 1111111110 u, .111‘ 1111111" 0d0 1211 An\ a\ 'n Kr; 11,11,10,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,111,111111111111111111111111111111111,1,11111111111111111 11111111111,11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111), 11111111111111111111111 1111111011111111111111111001011. 10000 „0,1,010111 11uuuumm111111111111111rrrq�� 111,11 000,1 00010,100110000011111111111111111111111111.11.1111111111111111111101110110«000000«000000«0000«0 w 03 win "=0M"0 LEK„EttCr'7Ai''engifdc and Maim T malt 1711,1C"4 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 17III'a.1m' City of Petronila Wildfire Hazard 0�1�1�1�1����1�������1„�,��»,�„�,�MIE17111111�1�\0\0�1�0�1�1�1�������������\����\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\��\�\ City Wide 0�1�1�1�1����1���r,�„��„�»,��„�i1111111111\111�1�1�1�1�1������\�\��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �� » i` �� o� �t iii � �� �� o��o""�� ��� . ����� ti .������ ����� ����000� `i �� �� o�� � �000 i��o� �i jai �� �� �� o� � �� i� ��a�� n1����`�������� ����� � ����� ��� �� ��o����io o����������� �intnirmisii» n ��i� ���»i� o���}����� ���� t� t t� 1�u1� � �,� 1. �1 1 .1I0\1��1����1��,���,��,1,�������,������1,,;,1�„1`������� ������������ �10\1��1���������,���,���,���,1,���y�������������,����,;,;�`��11�11�110�01�� 1���������,�����;,;,,�1�,��,������������������„�;,;,,���,���1 Unknown .75 .5 Construction Debris Burning tllt%%%%%EMZM%%%%% IEEEERSINEElgin 2 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 tassastatanssa...........................................................issumrmmzasss istamannatim 20% annual chance 1 fire every 5 years assastass sacrortzass astmcm nor/;,d,.. s iss smtnmssss iumittautztur3 tnntrantanza 114 79.36% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 18 1 If” a Figure 17-6. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Petronila 111VI111V4tIVIV11 '111111111111111 11111 iflit IN1nwll UIY I� VIW lr�vlwlou, ,nl fq 1..11111111111IalaN1 11111111 1.414 11111111111111111111111111111111 rffamisd 1111111111111111111111111111h 111111111111111111" AU „di 11111111111111 g1NV 1 ' 1rNIY° ��I�1�1111�tl �WI,� IYrt>i,`iYi/I t0V4,p IY � +14u1U4 i, UT �V � ttAlAe�e I I� I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II 1101)1,1,1,1,1,(1,11 11 11 1 1111101���IV4�' lllllllllllll1111'IIIII1Illllllllllml 11111111.11,111111 01111111111111111111111111110111 1)11 11111) 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 ion FHM X1111711111 I'' VV uVNVVH �I��IVV v' �rlti �I IIIA ld� � � 11 IVl �rn�!hlVl�V� vrlo ,,. W I llllfVrrru�ul i; olioolvb 1f!NI11 l0001111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111”. 1111 11111111 1111111111 L,t)citmood. Alronr.e'I 114'd�Ya weunrt9,. Ilrtrvr_^. Niue:es. C' ;n'bk" 1iti,gat [wln Acton ,Plan~ ¢' s? Loc;ata nuwO ng'lw,m and Tho rat 1770et. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 19 I P City of Port Aransas Wildfire Hazard y 1 4 City Wide v , \ 0\1\1�1�1��1�1�1�1������\�\���\�\\\����,�,;�;;����,�i��,�;;�,�„1���,���„��111�11001�1�11�\�`�1�`��`������\��\\�\\\�������������������������������������������������\\\ t �� u u v n� � 11,11111 0�1\1 11101��a�,1\111� .1`111�111�� �1111�1�111�� 11\\����1�1111� 1111 111\ � 1111�11 1 �1��1111`��111y — 3 Power Lines -1 Unknown -1 55 30 ISSISSIMICESSMS 11171711\I 11101111 5 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 nms\ss s\ummzrotznnslisautumnsas 50% annual chance 1 fire every 2 years SIIS%%%%t111%%%% 1111111110111111SSI ............. $1,96,921,937 $42,651,525 inns .s\tt toms% .1.% SIZEIMIS 1121111113 11111111113 121111111311 3,955 0% 2.92 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 20 1 IP ,n Figure 17-7. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Port Aransas 11111111,1,11,111111 Y NXI„ utte r# 0-.„Akrtr uv tlib naffit ^MU, Mitigation Acton, F . 4)41 Louzettyiet,reintb206, and NiffirelnrBat kR ?r 0 ' rit' :::4f' Mm Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 21 1 P a City of Robstown Wildfire Hazard 4 4�� City Wide Nallant Mat 1111111 TIMM Unknown - 51 fires Fireworks -1 fire Farm Equipment-lfire Debris Burning -1 fire 1.1.1SISSEREEISISS 70 60 stEgyaly wa smitto 54 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 SSSSSErZMISS SIZMAEZMEMEISCSSSZMMIIMSSS 540% annual chance 1 fire every 68 days ISSISSISMITIE Marl ZEIM ISSISS\ 11\”%rwormlimmillssx IsrlistwIt %will ,,,,, , I liii ,,, li,l „iii,,,l ,»�„ , „»�„II , � III ,,, „ „ , u ., lu III AI �S) ,. `. ,����� ,. � r ., ,. ,. AI n.. ,. Ail ,.. 4tt ,. AI n.. ”` � `1`111 � 11 I 1 m � I 1, 1 1,pp �1 11 � � �» l l 11 � �) , o ���������������,�����1���������������� ������������ �1 ill,,.���o�������� �������������I�l„�,�,»»l»»»�,»������������� �����������li»�,,,a�a�1,�a,�l,����� 11,576 66.32% 0 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 22 1 If” ,n 11 Figure 17-8. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for City of Robstown u1 II,I loam IVxVgll, `l..11.11111111,111,1,11111,11,1111111111.11.111111111111111111'11111MI1111 full pill 1 ,uulwwioYrllUlllllllf�) i11111 �VlY1� I�'iVl�nlllfi III1 1ILW'9 1 111;11141(v.; 114 1111 111101 11,11,1, vlulivv 'm " aw11v; 1101. 11111111111111111111 41,111,1 1010 ! ,,I, Lai 1111111111111111,11( Baum Na„,,,114100110111 V11 aNla vummi 11/ t®I avvvvv I11 1 a 11 I®1 mu11111 �uI Ilr; 001 1111111 I 01010 111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111 1 1111 ,;14401111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 ocarwood,, Arlorewer It ll16 W i1%idP% NC,. 11 11111111111„,; at vvvv 1111 u vi;lllll MIIII6IA'A111111111111111111 arta 1(1 M Oa/ ..d"aeai ayilaall rrod f1az:mrra azlilag,stion Action %alkan rare lv...cicaRtensv voDakcillavaa and It rs°at, aravavaaava. im.,,r.'I,wae1 f.'lu .Ae,„nww.wuur „„ r uu 1YuuluuulllY Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 23 1 P Port of Corpus Christi Authority Wildfire Hazard a. 4�� 1 Jurisdiction Wide ���1�0��1��0�0�1�1�1���������������,���,,I������\�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� I 001 ` 1 01 11 111 111 010 1 1 19 11111 010 1 11 tmaxtrimm1111 Illllll l 010 110 1111\ �01 �1 11� 1��1� ��1�1�� �� � ��1� ^ ���1�1�. � .�����1������� �1��1�1��1 ��1 � 1 ���������`���� ��1�1�� . �1 ��1 �IQ� .`������ "�������������^x 1 111�1� �1� � (�� 1�1��)11� � 1�1�1�� 1 ����"����� 1�) ^� �1�� � 1 „� ��1) 11���������Iuu, N �� to ��, ��,,. N I II qil,N AI. ,. n. �� � „����. Ott � tu. ,����, ,. ., ����, � �Vi � ..., �, ,��� � tu. ��, ,. ., ,����,��`��1����`I���1�������1�1����1������„;;���������1�1���1�������������`���`��`��1������1��11�1�������111��`����i1��1���1������11�����,;;,������������11�����������������,,;;;���1������1�`����������1��1����,,,,�1�� Various Welding equipment Landscaping equipment 225 100 ssssssamnsass SIBEENVERITISIMIll 4 0 deaths, 0 injuries $0 SSSSSSEZMSSSSS IVZMITZMEIMEISISSSVMMMIIMSSS 40% annual chance 1 fire every 2.5 years SSSSSSSW=1NZM2MMZSSS��S��������������� 111 1 1111 1111 ,11 111111 11111 1 �1 11 11 0� 1� 11 1 D 11 11 �1�111 �/01111/11 1 �1�111 so so 111,1\\"1‘1•117\ Ivaranma $ itninntimit Industrial Area; No Residents; Staff & Visitors Only 7.64% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 17 24 1 If" a Figur 17-9. Fire Locations / Origins and Wildfire Threat Index for Port of Corpus Christi Authority }\ ) 1010010loololiolo,1,11,11h400rifiooloo / I : efs R � g htt m \ � K ,. ing 11110c oiA:rAto, An P n a % 4n , viouddlele t! NAV Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action PIan — Section 17 251 Paye iir 51 tt �i i i lMiiil i �� iillllli uuu Yu o`li mull i Severe Winter Storms Hazard Overview 1 Unincorporated Nueces County Severe Winter Storms Hazard 7 City of Agua Dulce Severe Winter Storms Hazard 8 City of Bishop Severe Winter Storms Hazard 9 City of Corpus Christi Severe Winter Storms Hazard 10 City of Driscoll Severe Winter Storms Hazard 11 City of Petronila Severe Winter Storms Hazard 12 City of Port Aransas Severe Winter Storms Hazard 13 City of Robstown Severe Winter Storms Hazard 14 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Severe Winter Storms Hazard 15 Severe Winter Storms Hazard Overview Description A severe winter storm event is defined as a storm with snow, ice, or freezing rain. Severe winter storms are rare for the Texas Coastal area. Sever winter storms may include snowstorms, blizzards, cold waves and ice storms. Snowstorms include four or more inches of snow in a 12 -hour period. Blizzards are characterized by low temperatures and strong winds in excess of 35 mph with large amounts of drifting snow. A cold wave is a winter cold front with a drastic drop in temperature. An ice storm occurs when rain falls out of the warm and moist upper layers of the atmosphere into a cold and dry layer near the ground.1 Location Winter storms vary in location, intensity and duration but are considered rare occurrences in Nueces County and participating jurisdictions. It is assumed that all of the jurisdictions are uniformly exposed to winter storm events; therefore, all areas of the county are equally exposed. 1 State of Texas Mitigation Plan Update 2013 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 1 1 li" ,n S Extent Table 18-1 below displays the magnitude of severe winter storms. The wind-chill factor is further described in Figure 18-1. This is an index developed by the National Weather Service, although the chart is not applicable when temperatures are over 50° or winds are calm. Table 18-1. Extent Scale - Winter Weather Alerts 010000 0000000011 1,1 Ilul�u I 11 N111111 1 111 111111(1 100 000000100 00110 0 III 1 I 1 I 11 II 11 ill Pril (111 iiil 1 1 1111111 1111 �1. s 11111111111111111( 1111111111111111111111, 011 I 11111 111111 I loom I This alert may be issued for a variety of severe conditions. Weather advisories may be announced for snow, blowing or drifting snow, freezing drizzle, freezing rain, ora combination of weather events. Severe winter weather conditions may affect your area (freezing rain, sleet or heavy snow may occur separately or in combination). Severe winter weather conditions are imminent. Rain or drizzle is likely to freeze upon impact, resulting in a coating of ice glaze on roads and all other exposed objects. Small particles of ice usually mixed with rain. If enough sleet accumulates on the ground, it makes travel hazardous. Sustained wind speeds of at least 35 mph are accompanied by considerable falling or blowing snow. This alert is the most perilous winter storm with visibility dangerously restricted. Below freezing temperatures are expected and may cause significant damage to plants, crops and fruit trees. A strong wind combined with a temperature slightly below freezing can have the same chilling effect as a temperature nearly 50 degrees lower in a calm atmosphere. The combined cooling power of the wind and temperature on exposed flesh is called the wind—chill factor. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 2 1 P a Table 18-2 Historical Extents* Unincorporated Nueces County Agua Dulce Bishop Corpus Christi Driscoll Petronila Port Aransas Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority 1)11\131,),,\ 12° 15°* 19° 13° 15°* 15°* 15°* 14° 15°* AttAIAI 0" Unreported 4" 4.4" Unreported Unreported Unreported 5.1" Unreported *Records are limited by the presence of a National Weather Service weather station within the jurisdiction. Marked records are interpolated estimates. Wind chill temperature is a measure of how cold the wind makes real air temperature feel to the human body, similar to the heat index for extreme heat (Figure 18-2). Since wind can dramatically accelerate heat loss from the body, a blustery 30° day would feel just as cold as a calm day with 0° temperatures. The Coast Bend Region has never experienced a blizzard, but based on previous occurrences, Coastal Bend counties have been subject to winter storm watches, warnings, freezing rain, sleet, snow and wind chill. Based upon historical data, the worst that can be expected in the future in the planning area is six inches of snow and 10° Fahrenheit. Wind chill factors would further lower the apparent temperature, potentially as low as -19 degrees. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 3 1 Ii" ,n Table 18-3. Wind Chill Chart2 5 10 1 20 25 E 30 35 40 45 50 55 6 Temperature [°°F) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -3. 34 27 32 25 30 24 29 28 22 28 21 27 20 26 2 26 25 25 Frostbite Times -40 -45 it i mni,iiiiiimill1111111111:1117111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 1 ,17 7%�rt 1411:11'1'1111111111111 111111 1111 001 1111111110000 101VIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVU1 VIOV111111111°''' 11111,01iiii:1:1:!i;55111111111111. - 1 .:1111111111111111114311911:iii1111111511111111311111111111:I t � os -a::"66: --6792 " -. 776 3 —.9826 ' 9111111111461 111 --F1 0000s 1110 1101001opoo 000l000l000...."""11111111,,,11111 11 mt111111,„. 111111111:.54 - ,_62- -6 -84 -311 -98 -61 " -82 -89 -97J.. '11111341"'"410111i- 36 , 36 11111111111111 IN MI ac minutes 10 minue, 5 minutes s Wind Chill {OF) = 3534 + 0.6215T 3535(V.16) ".16) + 0.4275T Where T= Air Temperature (F V= Wind Speed (mph) Eft'rieriet Occurrences Sever winter storm events in Nueces County are rare. January is the month when snow, sleet or freezing rain is most likely to be observed; yet, winter weather conditions can occur at any time during the winter and early spring months. Table 18-3 shows historical occurrences for the area since 1950 as well as the type of event and the amount of damage provided by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Although there have been relatively few storms, it is likely that a number of occurrences have gone unreported. Additionally, historical winter storm information, as provided by the NCDC, shows winter storm activity across a multi -county forecast area for each event. In some instances within the Coastal Bend study area, a single record could consist of up to 12 counties. Therefore, an appropriate percentage of the total property and crop damage reported for the entire forecast area has been allocated to each participating county impacted by each event. 2 NOAA Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Section 18 4 1 P a Table 18-4. Historical Winter Storm Events by Jurisdiction (NCDC, 1950-2016) Nueces County Nueces County Nueces County Nueces County TOTALSi1 JIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIIII III 11111 I�IIII I IIII1111I HI 10 HI 11111111 01 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 1 1 Winter Weather Frost/Freeze Ice Storm Snow Storm 0 0 0 1111111 111111 6����u I il�lgp 0 Negligible 0 Negligible 0 Negligible 0 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Probability Hazard probability or reoccurrence intervals are calculated based upon the number of historical events during the period of examination. For example, if five winter Storms were to have taken place during a 66 year reporting period, the reoccurrence interval would be about 13 years, or a 7.5% annual chance of a winter storm. Because it is likely that more winter storms have occurred than are reported in the NCDC, the probability for winter storms occurring along the Coastal Bend Region is occasional, meaning an event is possible in the next five years. Impact Winter storms are associated with freezing or frozen precipitation such as freezing rain, sleet, snow and the combined effects of winter precipitation and strong winds. Wind chill is a function of temperature and wind. Low wind chill is a product of high winds and freezing temperatures. The leading cause of death during winter storms is transportation accidents. Hypothermia and frostbite are other dangers from very cold winter temperatures. Historical evidence shows that most of the area has a low risk of winter storm activity; however, past reported property damages indicate that, while winter events (typically consisting of snow and ice) do occur, their economic impacts are typically not severe across the entire study area. All buildings and facilities are considered to be exposed to this hazard and could potentially be impacted because it cannot be predicted where a winter storm event may cause damage or disruption. The agricultural industry in the Coast Bend Area is not usually effected by winter storms as crops are not usually planted during the winter months. Vulnerability Table 18-4 shows potential annualized property losses for each jurisdiction based on past reports of property and crop damages in each jurisdiction (NCDC, 1950-2016) and exposure values. "Negligible" indicates that the annualized expected property losses are less than $5,000. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 5 1 If" ,n Table 18-5. Potential Annualized Losses by Jurisdiction (Severe Winter Storm) 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Nueces County Agua Dulce Bishop Corpus Christi Driscoll Petronila Port Aransas Robstown Port of Corpus Christi "" 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 $860,464,240 $38,252,604 $215,262,986 $17,246,489,193 $38,757,328 $6,915,934 $1,189,078, $334,835,963 $174,026,681 OTALS. FOR STUDY AREA $20,104,083,700 A Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible 111111111111 dllliiuuf 11111 1111111111111 ul 1"u1fuuu11110 J 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% *Totals for the study area may include values less than $5,000 for dollar amounts that are classified as "Negligible "in the table. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 6 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Severe Winter Storms Hazard 1 4 County Wide (Unincorporated ISSIMIwzmittlann%\xml tkit 11171111"111111111111111111111111111111111 5 1 2 1 1 lst\Asssllmvtc7%,m\\...................:.................................................................... "I Nuv\\,. Imm!).1 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS hr's v<'%'�'' rGa11A1 NA Vk.t.V ‘.\Atit 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ISS%%%%1111%IS%.%\. VAN 15,274 $373,034,606 $487,429,634 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) 312,735 $50,663,070 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 7 1 P a City of Agua Dulce Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSIZIMSSSSS\ City Wide ISS%%%%MMISS% SSSSSSWZEIIMIMMIISSSSSIM 1111111 11121111 111 an SICESS 5 1 2 1 1 IssssmssmillatINI\sss IF" xkI� AAA 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS AVUI\s ;dam a„d 11,‘. naV 5 0 0 ISSSSS. I\\\\\\11 11111 \ Wit \ IMRE Intlant ISSIMMISSI 11111111 SUM SUM Negligible Negligible 820 $17,541,361 $20,711,243 3 $486 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 8 1 If” a City of Bishop Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSZEI\SMSSS City Wide tlyntErIMEMINIMINISIESS 5 1 2 1 1 tsAssssssmslmmtws\\ IF ” xl‘Ai% 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENTESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 SSSSSLRSSS VMS\ Vk\k‘A Alt% 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible assistEnsas Nisstnrzassussmratsw unintutramsommant 3,150 $115,889,915 $99,373,071 539 $87,318 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 9 1 If" a City of Corpus Christi Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSttan\SSSS City Wide ISISSSSMSSSSS ISSSSSSWZMMEEISSSS tlyntE TIMEM11111= Wan 5 1 2 1 1 lsslss\212\\‘\msl\ IF" tv- xk��.� 41% 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 SSSSSLRSSS VMS\ V&A A. Alt% 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ssssamctnssss \ *Iv ssamninas astrarassu unint utramisonant 324,074 $7,007,832,685 $10,238,656,508 24,632 $3,990,384 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 10 1 If” a City of Driscoll Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSIZMSS\SSS City Wide SSS%S.S.1111SSS.S.S ISSISSIMIZERVICISSISSIM1111111 11111111 "r1 1111 111111111 5 1 2 1 1 ISSASSS1112711\‘M\\Sxk a 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS %MS\ V&A A\ Alt% 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible t\N, \\* ISSIntrilant Inarnntatal 11•1311111111111 1111•11 SUM 752 $25,502,273 $13,255,055 465 $75,330 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 11 1 If" a City of Petronila Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSttan\SSSS City Wide ISISSSSMSSSSS ISSSSSSWZMMEEISSSS tlyntE TIMEM11111= Wan 5 1 2 1 1 lsslss\212\\‘\msl\ IF" tv- xk��.� 41% 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 SSSSSLRSSS VMS\ V&A A. Alt% 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ssssamctnssss \ *Iv ssamninas astrarassu unint utramisonant 114 $3,714,796 $3,201,138 927 $150,174 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 12 1 If” a City of Port Aransas Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSI City Wide ISSSSSSMMIMMIEMSSSS tlyntE TIMEM11111= Wan 5 1 2 1 1 11111 .ateU.n).1ry xr�%�\AAA 1 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS %WM ttv ,,,,, , es,sS�S>asiS�i%� Yr, 5 0 0 SSSSS1=ZnS Negligible Negligible \AA Nissxrrnrtassssswnmassv uninturnnumalartat 3,995 $414,531,219 $774,547,552 0 $0 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 13 1 If" a City of Robstown Severe Winter Storms Hazard SSSSSSMR\SSSS City Wide SSSSSSMMMITMMIRSSSSSS. Wan Mann Irranl SNIMS 5 1 2 1 1 iltru ‘sulu zwAlv "ncnwt: 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 ISSSSSSVZSSSSSS........................................................... 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible ISSSSS\E=tn\SSS A\\ WISSIEMMEISSASSMINISSI ,,,avert ) 11,576 $151,390,423 $183,445,540 6580 $1,065,960 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 14 1 If" a Port of Corpus Christi Authority Severe Winter Storms Hazard ISISSISS.72211111.1SSI sssssssttnsss\ slassammazzantalsam 5 1 2 1 1 )1\.1117,;} 1•11:11\f' S\1\ul\t ‘.%\ \\\ 5 3/26/1956 to 4/22/2015 66 1 EXTREME WINTER EVENT ESTIMATED EVERY 13 YEARS ISSSISSMSSS%% ' -�� � ctV� s �i i X00/% ,,,, � ANAM 5 0 0 Negligible Negligible lsssssstmnnssss...............istammang ...........................................................um% urn Ism swat issinnists N/A $174,026,681 $0 0 $0 *Nueces County Appraisal District, Reappraisal Plan 2015-2016 **Census of Agriculture, 2012 (The latest Agriculture Census published 2012) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 18 15 1 P a 101;191111 11111 I11111l U St mmifimmmum � r r r Ur�rrr�r l Mitigation Strategy 1 All Participating Jurisdictions Mitigation Actions 4 Unincorporated Nueces County Mitigation Actions 6 City of Agua Dulce Mitigation Actions 50 City of Bishop Mitigation Actions 68 City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 89 City of Driscoll Mitigation Actions 141 City of Petronila Mitigation Actions 162 City of Port Aransas Mitigation Actions 182 City of Robstown Mitigation Actions 201 Port of Corpus Christi Authority Mitigation Actions 247 Mitigation Strategy The Planning Team reviewed the goals and objectives from the 2012 Coastal Bend Mitigation Action Plan. Mitigation actions, new and old, are prioritized to reflect overall mitigation strategy, which is to reduce and eliminate the long-term risk of loss of life and property damage from the full range of disasters affecting the planning area. Each mitigation action is presented by jurisdiction in the section below. Each mitigation action included is in priority order (high, moderate, low), by best estimate of cost, if applicable, by potential funding source and identify which department or agency will administer the action and the action timeline. Each jurisdiction has multiple authorities to implement the mitigation strategy. Authority includes, but is not limited to, local planning and zoning, public works efforts, emergency management, tax authority, annual operation budgets, building codes and ordinances. As detailed in Section 6 of the report, the participating jurisdictions, with the exception of Petronila, participate in the NFIP. The City of Petronila does not participate in the NFIP because the city's jurisdiction is primarily limited to the ROW limits within the town center; the surrounding developed and agricultural parcels are part of the county. General hazard mitigation goals for the participating jurisdictions are defined below. The participating communities used very similar methods for ranking their mitigation actions. The Port of Corpus Christi Authority scored each action with a 1-5 score for the following criteria: Life & Safety, Property Protection, Technical Feasibility, Political Feasibility, Legality, Environmental Impacts, Social Impacts, Administrative Feasibility, the presence of a Local Champion for the action, and finally if the action supported other Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 11Page community objectives. A raw score was added for the ten criteria and was used to rank the actions. Unincorporated Nueces County and the Cities of Bishop, Driscoll, Petronila, and Agua Dulce used the same method but rated low or no cost actions higher due to the ease of implementation. The City of Corpus Christi used three primary factors to rank actions: benefits to public safety, cost, and economic impact. Goal 1 Protect public health and safety Object ive 1.1 Implement mitigation actions that will assist in protecting lives and property by making homes, businesses, public facilities, and infrastructure more resistant to high-risk hazards. 0I:d' edive .2 Maximize the utilization of the latest technology to provide adequate warning, communication, and mitigation of hazard events. Object d:live 1.3 Reduce the danger to, and enhance protection of, high risk areas during hazard events. Object 1. . Ensure that public and private facilities and infrastructure meet established building codes and enforce the codes to address any deficiencies. Goal 2 Protect new and existing properties. �:' ' d d:liv��: .1 .� It`d. Reduce repetitive losses to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Object d:live 2.2 .� Use the most cost-effective approach to protect existing buildings and public infrastructure from hazards. 0O'ed; d:live 2.3 Review existing ordinances, building codes, and safety procedures and enforce regulatory measures to ensure they protect lives and property. Goal 3 Build and support partnerships to enhance mitigation to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. C Build and support local partnerships to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. 0Ibped; d:live 3.2 Build a cadre of committed volunteers to safeguard the community before, during, and after a disaster. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 21Page „. Ea'Cdive: 3.3 Build hazard mitigation concerns into planning and budgeting processes. Goal 4 Leverage outside funds for investment in hazard mitigation. Objective 4.1 Maximize the use of outside sources of funding to help communities with local match requirements for implementing hazard mitigation actions to reduce risk. Objective 4.2 Maximize participation of property owners in protecting their properties. Objective 4.3 Maximize insurance coverage to provide financial protection against hazard events. Objective . . Prioritize mitigation projects based on cost-effectiveness, starting with those sites facing the greatest threat to life, health and property. Goal 5 Increase the understanding of residents for the need for mitigation, and steps they can take to protect people and properties. Objective 5.1 Heighten public awareness of the full range of natural and man-made hazards they face. Objective 5.2 Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all hazards. ., L jed' tJiv : ., Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation measures. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 31Page All Participating Jurisdictions Mitigation Actions IiluliiNu�VNV'lN��"NNuAaV�N"��""nng�V�NNNa,�NNgyrNVNBVNNNI�NNNNnu liV� Proposed Action Design and implement a program for public education. The program will educate citizens on methods of hazard mitigation and risk reduction. ACK ROUN INFORMATION Site and Location: Throughout entire planning area Risk Reduction Benefit: After engaging in this public education program, citizens will have improved awareness of how to mitigate their exposure to hazards and reduce risk to themselves and their property. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITI IATION ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Land Subsidence only applies to the following jurisdictions: Unincorporated Nueces County, City of Corpus Christi, Port of Corpus Christi Authority (areas with active subsidence) Dam Failure only applies to the following jurisdictions: Unincorporated Nueces County, City of Corpus Christi Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from a hazard -mitigation -savvy citizenry Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County and municipal budgets Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Risk Management Office and Local Emergency Management Offices Implementation Schedule: Annually NC( RPORATION INT LAN AND PFOCEDIJRES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 41Page 9 K UiipgRil oogo JI4 Ins Proposed Action Design and implement an emergency generator program for critical facilities within the planning area. ACK ROUN INFORMATION Site and Location: Critical facilities throughout the planning area. Risk Reduction Benefit: By designing and implementing an emergency generator program for critical facilities, communities will have generators in place in critical facilities before facilities are impacted by natural hazards. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure. MITIGAf'ION ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Land Subsidence only applies to the following jurisdictions: Unincorporated Nueces County, City of Corpus Christi, Port of Corpus Christi Authority (areas with active subsidence) Dam Failure only applies to the following jurisdictions: Unincorporated Nueces County, City of Corpus Christi Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing critical facilities will benefit by having generators in place before being impacted by natural hazard. Other new and existing buildings will benefit by having uninterrupted service from critical facilities. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $1,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Jurisdictional Budget, Planned Renovations, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Office of Emergency Management, Local Emergency Management Offices Implementation Schedule: 4 years INCORPORATION INTO' IN G PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 5 1 If" ,n g�,l�"NNS"NAaNNHPVEChnnpg`PVN�NVNA�NNflhNNNfl�NNNhNNhNnN"III Iliu lu, l �� 101 Proposed Action Design and insta I foundation watering systems to county owned buildings to reduce shrink/swell potential, and to protect these structures from movement during drought conditions. ACKGROUNb INFORMATION Site and Location: Critically Owned Facilities in all participating jurisdictions Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary moisture in the soil that supports county facilities to prevent shrinking and swelling and eliminate the potential of structural failure due to expansive soils. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure. MITIGAf'ION ACTION f ETAIL� Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought, Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be retrofitted with foundation watering systems and any new building will be required to have this water system installed during construction. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget to be included in the overall cost of upgrading and renovating county facilities' HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Facilities Departments of All Participating Jurisdictions Implementation Schedule: 4 years INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 6 1 If" ,n Unincorporated Nueces County Mitigation Actions Proposed Action loloyo 1111111,111,111111.11.111.11! „.:11,111.1111111.011 111 .. • 01111111111111111,1,11, Engage property insurance carrier inspectors to conduct annual risk assessments of county owned infrastructure and buildings. .ACI INFORI Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Each inspection will allow the risk management office to prepare risk assessments and loss prevention programs for county owned infrastructure. This action will also help them reduce insurance premium costs. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA II. AC1 h AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: The county will know the most current value of each infrastructure and vulnerabilities for each. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Risk Management Office Implementation Schedule: Annually NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE Loss Prevention Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 71Page uuu ��� N�uAaNN n �INuHA ��Yhh1ldl! uuu� 1,1,111111 Proposed Action Review damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures as determined appropriate incorporating the use of an Asset Management System. IA INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: Establishing Best Practices when determining damage assessments will allow the county to make accurate assessments which will lead to better improvements that reduce the risk. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION fE1AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: The county will be able to bring damaged structures into compliance with current regulations. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Office of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: Update Year 1, Review Annually NCORP( RATIONI T PLANS ANDPFtOCEDURE < Floodplain Regulations; Emergency Operations Plan; Risk Assessment Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 8 1 Ii" ,n uuuII1V1)uyuAaYNiinnn111INuHA"u0ph11VN11NNH4YhtlVldl'!Ptr 1W!1!iiIIIIIU 1.1.1111#110ili11000 Proposed Action "10000111111111000111111111 0111'000g 0 Implement a multi -hazard public awareness program specifically targeting the population that has special needs and therefore more vulnerable to hazards. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This plan will identify those areas considered special needs and outreach projects will be created and distributed to the identified areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Special need homeowners will be able to know they can take mitigation actions to protect their properties. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Office of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review and Administer Annually NCCFtP( RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < Emergency Operations Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 91Page uuuD���1,11uy1.AaNN��nnn�;11lV�NuNA11uHph��VN�NNH�YhhVldllIp�lli;j1,1:jiH ;� Proposed Action Implement a multi -hazard public awareness program. A INFO) MAT Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to make the public more aware of the hazards that effect the county and will provide mitigation ideas to homeowners so they can take step to help eliminate their vulnerabilities. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITI ATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Homeowners will know what types of mitigations they can do to protect their properties from the hazard risks. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Office of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review and Administer Annually NCCRP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OC URE Emergency Operations Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 10 lPage u��iN�NNAa�N �� nnn� 1 NuNA�uH �r��VN�NNH�YnnVlu 11 Ipuuu �11111111'1111I111111,11111111111111111001111111111�P" N�� � �� J 9 1111.1.111 Proposed Action Review all county department heat related safety policies, Establish best practice and update safety procedures as determined appropriate. A INFO) MAT Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to reduce the risk of extreme heat dangers for county employees who are required to work in the outside environment. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness Extreme Heat. Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): No effect. Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: Loss Prevention Plan County Annual Operating Budget County Office of Risk Management Update Year 1, Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 11 lPage 1111011111,011,1f d!,111,1,1,1 ,Wi„a\1 1.n'''��'N�s���l;'�!y°IN�'���°�I' I II i �p �� 01 1 �tll dld� NN�ii l dd Proposed Action 11'11 iiiiii1 II 1111I I Review county departments severe weather Property Protection Policies. Establish best practices in the policies to reduce the vulnerabilities to county owned properties. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: By establishing these policies, county buildings will be become less vulnerable to natural hazards. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Implementing these policies will provide guidance on how to protect existing buildings as well as build new structures less vulnerable to the hazard risk. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Office of Risk Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review and Administer Annually NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OC URE Loss Prevention Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5 ; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 12 1 If" ,n u�1)„1)ay11ha��MI p,1„11 11111111)1101 , 11111111111111111111111111111111110 i�011u111011.11111111111.111,111111111.11 JIM) Proposed Action 1111'11'11'11111111111111111 III l0001401 71111111 I4111111 I11111111111111111111111111111 „,„„u1,111111.0011„„, ,itt; " Conduct a Lightning Vulnerability Assessment for key county infrastructure including communications, fuel storage tanks and technology/communications systems. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to identify potential lightening risks to county infrastructure and help the county to determine what actions the county should take to alleviate the risk of lightning strikes. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N ACt ION DETAIL Lightning Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting buildings from lightning will reduce the damage caused by lightning and allow the county to provide uninterrupted services. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Office of Risk Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review Annually NCCRP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OC URE Loss Prevention Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 13 1 If" ,n uu1111, i1 � 71 !'4'k'lid Proposed Action N111r1II Conduct a wildfire vulnerability assessment of county infrastructure and create a wildfire protection plan. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to identify potential wildfire risks to county infrastructure and help the county to determine what actions the county should take to alleviate the risk of wildfires. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Wildfires Ha7arrl/c1 Arlrlraccarl• Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting buildings from wildfires will reduce the damage caused by wildfires and allow the county to provide uninterrupted services. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Risk Management Office Implementation Schedule: Annually NC. RP RATION INT LAN3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< Loss Prevention Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 14 1Page us uAa a Il �,luii u, V �NNY�NNN'tl"lil N " II��V�@uV��,!lu D> � N� N uiiIi t 9i rM � nn III 111.111.1.11 10001,..1[11 a IIV @V Proposed Action Update Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) INFO,IMAI Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to identify potential wildfire risks to county infrastructure and help the county to obtain federal funding to perform fire risk reduction activities. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfires Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting buildings from wildfires will reduce the damage caused by wildfires and allow the county to provide uninterrupted services. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: County Annual Operating Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: County Risk Management Office Implementation Schedule: Annually NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OC URE Loss Prevention Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 15 lPage Proposed Action 11,1111111 .1.1 waw: Ili; 00 111.11 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111111 Implement the 2016 Drainage Master Plan that outlines the actions to be taken to solve the drainage issues in the identified areas. INFO MA Site and Location: Unincorporated areas of Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to reduce the effects of localized drainage throughout the Upper Oso Creek, Chapman Ranch, and San Petronila Estates areas of the Nueces County. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flooding, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting buildings from localized flooding due to rains, hurricanes, tropical storms, and dam failures will reduce the damage caused to buildings by these hazards. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP, FMA, PDM Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC( RP( RATION INT LAN AND PF OC URE Nueces County Master Drainage Plan; Stormwater Master Plan, Floodplain Regulations ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 16 1 If" ,n y�u��say��Aa���nnn��iHuNA�N�r��u�wNHH��nn�iull� ���i Proposed Action Review Business Continuity Plan, establish best practice and update as determined appropriate by Commissioner's Court INFORMAL Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help identify Best Management Practices and bring all county departments together to identify their potential risks to hazards and how to keep the county economy strong while recovering from sets backs caused by hazards. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations min GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: N/A Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low; Less than $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: Local County Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: All County Departments with Risk Management and Emergency Management Office Implementation Schedule: Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 17 lPage 1U �wuiy,u�l NiP iN nBVNI��NVN YN111111?"11 nflflV1111NNf'1111NNNIpNnI��� mmvitll 1.1,11111100111100100,10101,00 uw 1001 1 111100001,01110 INhphh�� 11,1 11 Proposed Action vvv1111'111 11111 111fill111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I1I1111111111111111111111111111 uu to 1111,1,111„111101110111111110111111111ill111111:11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiii .,00V11,11 000 0000001,1VV, Evaluate impacts of dam failure on the County population and County operations for both Lake Corpus Christi and Choke Canyon Reservoir scenarios. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help identify the risks to the population at large of Nueces county and its potential risk to county services during a dam failure incident from Lake Corpus Christi and Choke Canyon Reservoir. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DE- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: During a Dam Failure incident, all structures, both privately and publicly owned, in the inundation areas are at risk of being damaged. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Cost Share from all Agencies Involved. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Combined effort, EOC, City of Corpus Christi, USACE, River Authority Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPO EXITIN+ NS ANLL PROCEE Nueces County Master Drainage Plan; Dam Failure Plans for Lake Corpus Christi and Choke Canyon ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 18 1 If" ,n '111111.11111 Proposed Action 171111111111111111 11111111111 1111111111 1"111111111111111,11111111111,011111,11 11001N Establish drought tolerance criteria for new landscaping and modify existing as appropriate to prevent loss and future erosion at county owned facilities. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will reduce the need for watering and conserve water while maintaining the aesthetics of landscaping at county owned facilities. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN ACTIN AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Exiting landscaping will be replaced with drought tolerant landscaping and new buildings will be required to plan drought tolerant landscaping. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Facilities Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPO EXI"STING LANS ANf PROCE Facilities Department Regulations ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =3; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 19 lPage ugpiD��N����NNuAa1,jinnV�iuNph��V��NNY�YhNVd Q IV.00011111 hC 111 111111111 W1N!tN9N' Proposed Action Purchase portable air conditioning units to provide support for critical operations and information systems for use during HVAC or power outage. A INFO MAT Site and Location: Nueces County owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will reduce the loss of county services in the event of a disaster and limit the time county services are disrupted. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MOT ATI N ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Tornado Effect on new/existing buildings: Having portable A/C units will keep electronic equipment working properly and county staff will be to keep working at county facilities. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Facilities Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Nueces County Facilities Regulations/Procedures. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =3; and Environmentally Sound =3 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 20 lPage uu ,IJ us NAaNN NNii1,1Vnnn11, IVNNuNA11uN NhN�VNNNN4YNtlV�N"I'I Il uu I1uJIIVUNNNNNPo 'l"1 ' ' ihi11 �11iiyym, „„,��� Proposed Action Assess all shoreline conditions within Nueces County. A INFO MAT Site and Location: Beaches Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary information for the county to adopt a Shoreline Erosion Plan. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Natural Systems Protection MITIGATIbN ACTION f ET:AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Having a Shoreline Erosion Plan will help guide future development along the shores of Nueces County. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; Coastal Erosion Control Grant. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Coastal Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years Nueces County Shoreline Erosion Plan; ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 21 1Page ugpiD�� N,1,111AaNN f nnn�l111N'NuNA�uNgy�NhN�V�1NNY�YNNVINIIo „�reveriri W 1• Proposed Action Update the Nueces County Dune Protection Plan and Erosion Response Plan A fNFOJ MAT Site and Location: Beaches Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: An updated Dune Protection Plan and Erosion Response Plan will help Nueces County to continue with their efforts to protect dunes from development and to respond appropriately when erosion development as well the natural functions of the beaches within Nueces county. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structural and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Coastal Erosion. Effect on new/existing buildings: Having a current Dune Protection and Erosion Plan will help guide future development along the beaches of Nueces County. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; Coastal Erosion Control Grant. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Coastal Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE Nueces County Dune Protection Plan; Erosion Response Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 22 lPage uuuD�� ��suy�AaNN �nnn��I NuHA�u�p���VN�NN11 HQYhtllillI 11!p uM� ' • yc, I11111 Proposed Action Establish an alternate backup site suitable to continue essential Emergency Operations Center duties in the event the current Emergency Operations Center is not accessible. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Nueces County EOC Risk Reduction Benefit: Creating an alternate EOC, the county will be able to maintain continuity of services if the current EOC location is compromised and cannot be utilized. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITIGAin bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes/Tropical Storms Effect on new/existing buildings: A new building will have to be built and outfitted with necessary equipment to become an alternate EOC. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: State and Homeland Security Grants Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Department of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: 3 Years Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =3; Legal =5; Economically Sound =3; and Environmentally Sound =3 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 23 lPage III II1.11,111,1, II' lm.,,m.• 1111 ,1111,1111i1111.111iji“..11.11.,11,., IoI1I , III Proposed Action Install hurricane shutters or other appropriate high impact window protection to prevent breakage during a Natural Hazard Event A INFO MAT Site and Location: Island Park Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary protection from Hurricanes on county owned facilities at Island Park. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Windstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting facilities with storm shutters will reduce the risk of damage to existing buildings during a hurricane. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Coastal Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 24 lPage uliuD�� ��Iuy�AaYN � ii nnn��lV�NuHA�uH ph��VN�NNJ 111ul'I !�1 111111�'"I)1 )�i,� �nrn it a 1,11id o111 1 � W ®� �eq Proposed Action Install hurricane shutters or other appropriate high impact window protection to prevent breakage during a Natural Hazard Event A INFO MAT Site and Location: All Inland Parks within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary protection from Hurricanes on county owned facilities at Parks located on the mainland. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTIN f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Windstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting facilities with storm shutters will reduce the risk of damage to existing buildings during a hurricane. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Inland Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 25 lPage YN���I1I1111no1111plVl1111.1hi.1i����fldmI„ 111111111111,111-111�Nh{111,111011111i ifivom 111111111111 v1 Proposed Action Install Lighting Alert Systems in Nueces County Parks that have outdoor athletic fields and or campgrounds. A INFO MAT Site and Location: All Inland Parks within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary public awareness and protection from the potential risk of being struck by lightning when the population is utilizing county parks, athletic fields or campgrounds. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGATIbN ACTION E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Inland Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years NCORP( RATION INT L 3 AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 26 1Page 1,y��111�������111011111I010.N611,11,bl1CNN���1i�(��hhdnn,�� 10004., 11110 014111111111111110 11110.1.1.11.10.101101111,101.0.111,,Iii,i!:1,11.11,11.11,0„1,,,(iniiiiI(j)).)).il..01)0p1,101.1.11,1•11•1011111M1111';'"I'111'111.J1141,1111ii?}.0..0ilijtliiitililif u„101110101110110.,11101011 Proposed Action 11111 1,1; 111vIlli011111111111,1,1,1,1,11111 j11111 j11111111111 00100011100000 phi Install Emergency Generators at specific facilities at inland parks for Emergency Operations & Logistics Support that the parks department provides after a disaster. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Inland Parks within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary back-up electricity that will necessary for the inland parks department to support the county EOC during the event of a disaster. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTH 'AIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Windstorm, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be retrofitted with emergency generators to retain continuity of county services. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $450,000 Potential Funding Sources: Included in renovation and upgrade costs; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Inland Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCCRP( RATION Td EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 27 lPage uuuD>111uuuy�aNN Y" N NV A��VNRi'lIM'I V A 22 Proposed Action This action is to create a plan to preserve the unique ecosystems encompassing Hazel Bazemore Park by restoring the park's natural resources through the mitigation and protection of its habitat while concurrently providing public access and ecotourism opportunities for park patrons. The objectives of the proposed project are to implement an environmentally engineered plan by executing erosion control techniques, constructing riverbank stabilization, remediation of native vegetation, providing public access through timber walkways and nature overlooks; and protecting and preserving the habitat through interpretive signage educating the public. ACKGR UND INFORI Site and Location: Hazel Bazemore Park Risk Reduction Benefit: Creating this plan will help to restore bank stabilization while bringing back native plant and aquatic species to preserve the unique ecosystem that encompasses Hazel Bazemore Park. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be retrofitted with emergency generators to retain continuity of county services. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $1, 500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Inland Parks Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 28 1 If" ,n Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INC RP( RATION INTd EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 29 lPage Proposed Action j 1 P UUUIIII �fl' P' �f N1)141.111,111,1 �I •• ''''.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111 This project is to restore, enhance and expand an existing wetland in the Corpus Christi Beach area by excavating an upland area and creating a hydrologic connection between the wetlands and Corpus Christi Bay. The connection will create a mix of tidal and fresh water and increase the environment available to aquatic species. Educational and informational signs will inform the public about the environment and the ecological value of wetlands and create public awareness to further promote the conservation and protection of the area. ACKGR UND"INFORI Site and Location: North Beach Wetlands Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help alleviate the risk of hurricane and tropical storm damage to land in Nueces county by improving the functionality of the wetlands and wetlands capability of containing more water during a hurricane or tropical storm. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATIbN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings may become better protected from the effects of storm surge and coastal erosion by having a thriving wetlands. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $2, 500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Coastal Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years NCCRP(RAN INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OC URE Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 30 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 31 1Page 11,11IIP'uu�y�'A'p,N1i111"11iMI1110Nh�1a1I1.11111IkN'NiP'd'11°uil Uu upiui+Wuu uH" n �om1V ua ( 'IPim II. Proposed Action h° IIIIIIIIII 11111,1 „..111,11111,11.11111 Idi(1.111,111011111.111110 l'111111111111111111110101'1111111 11111111 1111111111'1'1'1'111111111111 '1 III Install a potab e water storage container system for Courthouse and Jail to support operations during disaster that effect the county public water supply. AC. INFORI Site and Location: Nueces County Courthouse and Jail Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary back-up water that will be necessary for the continuity of services at the Nueces County Courthouse and Jail. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure ATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure, Tornado, Drought, Extreme Winter Weather Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be retrofitted with potable water containers that can be filled to retain the continuity of county services. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $150,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget to be included in the overall cost of upgrading and renovating county facilities. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Facilities Department/ Nueces County Sheriff's Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INCoRPO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PRCCE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 32 1 If" ,n 1111111„;1,1„,iP iN�ll°Alli II I'n, 1'nl AVN1NHuHA 1111 ph,1V11 I1111ghhlV d dil l I 111111 11 11 ��%�iilld��6IIVfliIYdlYlll11Vlii9111d1h.hll ai111111oiYku',d1114Id,VI1' Proposed Action o v„1 1 111111111 li it III III IIII II Ill Design and install foundation watering systems to county owned buildings to reduce shrink/swell potential, and to protect these structures from movement during drought conditions. ACKGR( UND INF OR Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary moisture in the soil that supports county facilities to prevent shrinking and swelling and eliminate the potential of structural failure due to expansive soils. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure ATI 14 ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought; Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be retrofitted with foundation watering systems and any new building will be required to have this water system installed during construction. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget to be included in the overall cost of upgrading and renovating county facilities' HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Facilities Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCRP(RANI T AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 33 1 If” ,n 11'11'11,1,11)11, umu... Proposed Action rir iNf 'I' u "4idhii° Establish underground utilities to current and future County facilities as appropriate to prevent power and communications disruptions during a disaster. AC. INFORI Site and Location: All utilities that serve Nueces County Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary protection to public utilities to maintain continuity of services after a disaster. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITI ATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget; Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Facilities Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INC(RPO EXI"STING LANS ANLL PRCCE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 34 1Page 1111111,, Proposed Action 1111111111 illyvvvrill Buy-out Repetitive Loss Properties that are on FEMA's Repetitive Loss List for Nueces County. A INFO MAT Site and Location: Various Locations throughout Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will eliminate the risk of flooding to those structures that FEMA has designated as Repetitive Loss structures. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN ACI JON E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be purchased by the county and replacement structures will be placed outside of flooded areas. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $500,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 35 1 If" ,n uluD>�111uuNe1N�1ilA11l61NI'y1'{hh�VANANN�NRDoiI � 111 0do1' YI1 0000 IdII1111WPINt�@111111 I III 19NNNVNNI111111 0 'f it 10 Proposed Action Incorporate additional flood proofing systems to county owned facilities go protect them from damages incurred during hurricanes. A fNFOIMAT Site and Location: Nueces County Owned Facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will help to alleviate the potential risk of damages that can occur to the county owned facilities from hurricane winds and flooding. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structural and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN AC1 h 'AIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes Effect on new/existing buildings: Existing buildings will be retrofitted with more flood proofing systems and new buildings will be built with flood proofing system during construction. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $150,000 Potential Funding Sources: Included in renovation and upgrade costs; HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Facilities Department and Sheriff's Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCORP( RATION T' L 3 AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 36 1 If" ,n D�1N�'�suy�NAaNNH,fliinnn�t�1111111111111,,uNNhN�VN�NNN�YNNVIN1jII�IpuRiaY11,111,1 Proposed Action This project's aim is to alleviate flooding and non - point source water and pollutants entering into the watershed by constructing a stormwater detention pond/swale system incorporating best management practices. The wet ponds will remove pollutants from storm water (bacteria, sediment, and dissolved nutrients) by settling suspended particulates, biological uptake, consumption of pollutants by plants, algae, and bacteria in the water, decomposition of some pollutants, and attenuation of bacterial coliform contaminants. The wet ponds proposed will maintain a permanent pool of water in addition to temporarily detaining stormwater. The large volume of storage in the pond also helps to reduce peak stormwater discharges which in turn help control downstream flooding and reduce scouring/erosion of stream banks. ACI INFOFRJ Site and Location: Upper Reaches of Oso Creek within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary detention requirements as well as provide water quality aspects from the runoff that goes into the Upper Oso Creek watershed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $2,300,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCORP( RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 37 1 If" ,n Oso Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 38 1Page VIII D����s�y��AaN, fl NuHAuH p���Vv vNNY4Yh�Vv0 �1 i1q1�uia�I��u�Y vvvvvvvv „vv.!, 1bTJiW1±IiIM Proposed Action This project's aim is to alleviate flooding and non - point source water and pollutants entering into the watershed by constructing a stormwater detention pond/swale system incorporating best management practices. The wet ponds will remove pollutants from storm water (bacteria, sediment, and dissolved nutrients) by settling suspended particulates, biological uptake, consumption of pollutants by plants, algae, and bacteria in the water, decomposition of some pollutants, and attenuation of bacterial coliform contaminants. The wet ponds proposed will maintain a permanent pool of water in addition to temporarily detaining stormwater. The large volume of storage in the pond also helps to reduce peak stormwater discharges which in turn help control downstream flooding and reduce scouring/erosion of stream banks. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Chapman Ranch Reaches of Oso Creek within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary detention requirements as well as provide water quality aspects from the runoff that goes into the Chapman Ranch Region of the Oso Creek watershed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITIGA11bN AC1 h 'AIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 39 lPage Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INCORP( RATION INTO EXIS7 ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Oso Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 40 1Page DuuuD>M,'1)�NY'1NNN Iyilnnn4iI NuNA�uNN�N�V�11NNYQYNtlYINI'!o Proposed Action „„„fadAri//ra � This project's aim is to alleviate flooding and non - point source water and pollutants entering into the watershed by constructing a stormwater detention pond/swale system incorporating best management practices. The wet ponds will remove pollutants from storm water (bacteria, sediment, and dissolved nutrients) by settling suspended particulates, biological uptake, consumption of pollutants by plants, algae, and bacteria in the water, decomposition of some pollutants, and attenuation of bacterial coliform contaminants. The wet ponds proposed will maintain a permanent pool of water in addition to temporarily detaining stormwater. The large volume of storage in the pond also helps to reduce peak stormwater discharges which in turn help control downstream flooding and reduce scouring/erosion of stream banks. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Agua Dulce Reaches of the Petronila Creek watershed within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary detention requirements as well as provide water quality aspects from the runoff that goes into the Agua Dulce region of the Petronila Creek watershed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 41 1 If" ,n Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INCORP( RATION INTO EXIS7 ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 42 1Page uui1111] AA�s�yNAa�N ; nnn��1 NuNA�uH phi{V111NNYpYhTili 11,1,11„1.),1).,11!111.11.11 ' '?1?1, 1.1 rVUP 1111 kluul Proposed Action This project's aim is to alleviate flooding and non - point source water and pollutants entering into the watershed by constructing a stormwater detention pond/swale system incorporating best management practices. The wet ponds will remove pollutants from storm water (bacteria, sediment, and dissolved nutrients) by settling suspended particulates, biological uptake, consumption of pollutants by plants, algae, and bacteria in the water, decomposition of some pollutants, and attenuation of bacterial coliform contaminants. The wet ponds proposed will maintain a permanent pool of water in addition to temporarily detaining stormwater. The large volume of storage in the pond also helps to reduce peak stormwater discharges which in turn help control downstream flooding and reduce scouring/erosion of stream banks. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Driscoll Reach of the Petronila Creek Watershed within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary detention requirements as well as provide water quality aspects from the runoff that goes into the Driscoll region of the Petronila Creek watershed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 43 lPage Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INCORP( RATION INTO EXIS7 ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 44 1Page giiiND>�NI���NNuAaNN innn�llNNuNA�uN NNV�NY IIl� Proposed Action 11 ,111,1 VV111U ,i H' iY ILTL This project's aim is to alleviate flooding and non - point source water and pollutants entering into the watershed by constructing a stormwater detention pond/swale system incorporating best management practices. The wet ponds will remove pollutants from storm water (bacteria, sediment, and dissolved nutrients) by settling suspended particulates, biological uptake, consumption of pollutants by plants, algae, and bacteria in the water, decomposition of some pollutants, and attenuation of bacterial coliform contaminants. The wet ponds proposed will maintain a permanent pool of water in addition to temporarily detaining stormwater. The large volume of storage in the pond also helps to reduce peak stormwater discharges which in turn help control downstream flooding and reduce scouring/erosion of stream banks. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Petronila Reach of the Petronila Creek Watershed within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary detention requirements as well as provide water quality aspects from the runoff that goes into the Petronila region of the Petronila Creek watershed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITIGATI N AC1 h 'AIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 45 lPage Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INCORP( RATION INTO EXIS7 ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 46 1Page 1,111 DI Y'""i uiip N p nn�ll�lllll Proposed Action This project's aim is to alleviate flooding and non - point source water and pollutants entering into the watershed by constructing a stormwater detention pond/swale system incorporating best management practices. The wet ponds will remove pollutants from storm water (bacteria, sediment, and dissolved nutrients) by settling suspended particulates, biological uptake, consumption of pollutants by plants, algae, and bacteria in the water, decomposition of some pollutants, and attenuation of bacterial coliform contaminants. The wet ponds proposed will maintain a permanent pool of water in addition to temporarily detaining stormwater. The large volume of storage in the pond also helps to reduce peak stormwater discharges which in turn help control downstream flooding and reduce scouring/erosion of stream banks. fNFOI'MAI Site and Location: Bishop Reach of the Petronila Creek Watershed within Nueces County. Risk Reduction Benefit: This action will provide the necessary detention requirements as well as provide water quality aspects from the runoff that goes into the Bishop region of the Petronila Creek watershed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 47 1page Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years INCORP( RATION INTO EXIS7 ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 48 1Page .�ro1111lIII"Mg '"Ii11111111!1.11111111.1111111110 " i1111111.111111111� 11,111.1111111� yo, VIS ii 1(111111'111i:11 0(11(1111 III II Proposed Action 11104111 Design and implement a dam breach study for dams in Unincorporated Nueces County. ACKGR UND INF OR Site and Location: Belvy Lake Dam, Chapman Ranch Lake Dam, Gertrude Lubby Lake Dam Risk Reduction Benefit: Better hazard -related information will improve the disaster resilience of the community. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Natural Systems Protection MITIGA1bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from improved hazard information Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NC RP RATION INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 49 1Page City of Agua Du ce Mitigation Actions 1Nan11SNA N w 11,4 11.111r IIII111111111101001:00 111 p ° %;111011100 ul �I11, 011,11.!10,1,11111r 1111100, ,aw 0111111111..1111,110V . V11111111 jl " 1111111111111111111111 Proposed Action Implement an annua program for clearing debris from bridges, drains and culverts ACKGROUND INFOR, Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Reduces vulnerability to flooding Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Hazard(s) Addressed: MITIGATI N ACTION f E7'AIL Flooding Effect on new/existing buildings: Protect new/existing building from flooding Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: Annual ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 50 lPage u�u�y�AaNN iv � i nnn111 11I NuHA�u" ph�1111il?NNYI?Iilii,,d 1uuou:1("1�pi,,11111111Ia;m;pp�'� "YI �I�Ih�h� Proposed Action Store books, manuals, permits, and other critcal government records on the upper floor (s) and/or on shelves above the base flood elevations. INFORMAL Site and Location: City facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Reduces the risk of flooding books, manuals, permits, and other critical records. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MOT GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact to new or existing building Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Secretary Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATION INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 51 lPage ;nnn4 �iHuNA� N��r1pNH1p1nn1la'lRMnrMin dildwhill h nnlpuuiu Proposed Action Work with neighboring communities to establish common watershed planning directives fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Watershed -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Ensure that planning directives exist at the watershed level, reducing vulnerability to flooding Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI ATI N ACTIN AIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Flooding vulnerability is reduced for all new and existing buildings in the watershed Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 52 1 If" ,n [„y,yo„livivii,�l l ��1 l l �� '�'� GM W .,I I � wnl�l�,ll 1[11111011,1[1' [1'7 7. IIA 10.nI 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II „1,11,111,1,1111111111111111 vyyII11111.I11ni1!(u 11 1111111 VIVI! 0001,11111,111111:11vv,I Proposed Action Prepare and advertise the local emergency evacuation plan, such as escape routes, in coordination with Dept. of Transportation INFORMAL Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Once educated, the public should behave in a manner that reduces hazard vulnerability of people and property. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations, Education and Awareness .04111, ATI N ACTIN f 1AIL Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the behavioral improvements of a hazard -educated public Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 53 1 If" ,n y�qu��say��Aa���nnn� �iHuNA� N�r��u�wNHH��nn�iu l l� u� i�u'u'P�!u�al!u uui �u�!Cggqi Proposed Action Update public community facilites to include severe weather action plans and designated tornado shelter areas INFORMAL Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Provides locations for the public to seek shelter in the event of a natural hazard Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN AP .1 AIL Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact to new or existing development Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: so Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NC RP RATION INT LANE AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 54 1page nnn� i HuNA� N �r�1u�wNHH111nn1iu'li 1 lV)�1ua�ii� I !� I l�uaa� n „„„„ Proposed Action 11111111111111111111111101 Purchase NOAA "All Hazards' radios for early warning and post -event information and place in area schools/businesses/critical facilities INFO F MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Critical facilities Provide improved awareness to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness M ITIGATI N ACTI AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, Floods, Windstorms, Lightning, Tornado, Hailstorms, Dam and Levee Failure, Wildfire, Winter Storms, and Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact on new or existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $150 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 55 1 If” ,n uuuD>1 Nusuy�AaNN ii�nnn��IN�NuNA�uN raw ..��11 hN�VN�N.NN111YNNVIpNI0ui Pe NNR' e l 111) '` 1,1 I ' NIIIi..�L +i „1'1!11i,J � Proposed Action Review damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures as determined appropriate incorporating the use of an Asset Management System. INFORMAL Site and Location: City-wide; City -facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Updating management practices will reduce vulnerabilities to natural hazards. An asset management system will allow for the systematic and efficient management of assets, reducing their vulnerability to natural hazards. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Min ATI N ACTIN AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: An asset management system will allow for better management of assets in new or existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 56 lPage 1111,11!!!!!!� 'i nnV� I NVNA�uH ph�ll11101111111111111111'111)111.11).1111'1111{110 N 111Yhh111'Q !!)11�Gd 1 '1Ga1111i 1111111 11111111110J1 11111J1111111,1 r1.11.11 1.1ji lr'f111 "�"° N ' l�u'u1ll10001llil,!1111.0 Ii Ir I 1r l� Proposed Action Special Needs Public Education and Outreach INFORMAL Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A better informed public will behave in a manner that reduces the vulnerability of people and property to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGA11'NAP..I AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: An educated populace will be able to reduce vulnerability to natural hazards Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 57 lPage lul.ID>IJpi i�uy�4(111 NljII1.,111tiV�Nn1hN)a)'n�nd1Ra'N. �10 111 1,' �'I�u�uiu�m Proposed Action 1111oni I 411 loot II till( III 11 lill 1111111111111111 1111111111111 Public Education programs to educate population on dangers and mitigation options. INFORMAL Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A better informed public will behave in a manner that reduces the vulnerability of people and property to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGA11bN ACTh AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: An educated populace will be able to reduce vulnerability to natural hazards Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 58 1 If" ,n y�� u��say��Aaa� � nnu�np, NuNA� N pr����pflNN�111111111 Proposed Action Community Wildfire Risk Assessment INFOI MA1 Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Improved awareness of vulnerabilities to wildfire Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI "ATIbN ACTY AIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the overall decrease in wildfire vulnerability Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: so Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: Regular Department Budget NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 59 1Page y��u��say��Aaa��nnu�np,NuNA�N prHill nnliullol",";�','�,��'� �r Proposed Action Community Wildfire Protection Plan update INFO MA', Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: City -Wide Improved awareness of vulnerabilities to wildfire Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI ATI N ACTIN AIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the overall decrease in wildfire vulnerability Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 60 1Page nn�np�HWNVNu�VN�ph��fl��flNYpYhhmolloIpoll 11111,11n loo llooll111110111H 1111111111111111001 00 1 111111,1l �� �tli�tl iii Proposed Action Conduct public education program on fire risks and wildland fire mitigation, with the assistance of the Texas Forest Service. INF ORM A' Site and Location: City -Wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A better informed public will behave in a manner that reduces the vulnerability of people and property to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness Mr, GATI bN ACTIN f 1AIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: An educated populace will be able to reduce vulnerability to natural hazards Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 61 lPage y�� u��iay��Aav� � nnu�np, NuNA� N pr����pflNN��11111111 i��� 1 11 IA 1111111111 Proposed Action Creation of Master Drainage Plan for implementation INFO MAI Site and Location: City -Wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Reduce flooding vulnerability through sound stormwater management Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATI bN AP..I 'AIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the overall reduction to flooding hazards Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Secretary Implementation Schedule: 4 years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 62 1Page BVI 1� .er Proposed Action Obtain certification of communities by the National Weather Service as "Storm Ready" communities. INFO !VIA Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATI I N ACTIN f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Terrorism, Hazardous Material Release, Pipeline Failure, Pandemic Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 63 lPage 0000.[[[.!0 1,1[100.0100.1[11[1[100.0011000,00,,,,,, � j00nnn�101 NuNA�HH 1111�NNY�Yh1Vldll 'pub 11.1,11 11110 , W1111111 lli 111111 J1l l li1111 h' l'lip 1111111 1idii Proposed Action Assess use performance/impact zoning to set risk- based standards for land development. Establish "agricultural use districts" in zoning ordinance to limit densities in known hazard areas. Establish procedure to utilize overlay zones for requiring mitigation techniques in high -hazard districts. INFORMAL Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A master development plan will regulate development and ensure that development takes place in a hazard -resilient manner Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Min GATIbN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Drought, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the overall hazard reduction derived from an updated master development plan Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Secretary Implementation Schedule: 2-3 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 64 1 If" ,n Cnnn��I�IIIIIIIuNIIII(1111111 1111i1I PN � ',si '1111ViJ111' Proposed Action 1"'" 11111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 10011,1111,111,111110111111111111111 111111111 1111 olr"11111111, 111111111111111 1IIIo „,!9!„„. s''ao�u�ln�aone,,,n,,� a��e��ao'l�iilreeo�a Work with county, state and federal agencies to maintain up-to-date hazard data, maps, etc. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Up to date hazard data and maps will allow for a better understanding of natural hazards that threaten the city Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from better hazard data Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 2 years NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 65 lPage 1111u�,11ay��Aa���nnn��ivHuNA�N1111111(�u�wNHH��nn�iulI� MMir �����1" Proposed Action UZILI1fII 1"" '111111111111111111111111111111111111111'111111111111 '1'1'1111111111 „it 14 Install emergency generator for critical facility - police dispatch/city hall INFORMAL Site and Location: City critical facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Generators will help critical facilities respond in the face of natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA11bN AC.I AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the support provided by generator -equipped critical facilities Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: 4 years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 66 1 If" ,n 1111111ulu,•,,, ����Aa1� � ��� lal wwww�ww 111111111111111111111le- 1 Proposed Action �I II �y�� iaui l� 11111111 111 Install quick -connect emergency generator hook- ups for critical facility- school. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: City critical facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Generator hook ups will help critical facilities respond in the face of natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTT N f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the support provided by generator -equipped critical Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Agua Dulce ISD Implementation Schedule: 4 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 67 1 If" ,n City of Bishop Mitigation Actions uulii y�� �luyuAaNN � .� nn I�IV NuHa�uH p 1111NNNY4Yh4mi ll I p11 II III 41,.11flIff1J1)1 '1'11'1111'111H Proposed Action mid 11111 gq��4UUl NA' ��mLifmj' "u =. li i///G/ wi ih l6 Implement an annual program for clearing debris from bridges, drains and culverts A fNFOIMAI Site and Location: City-wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Reduce flooding vulnerability by ensuring drainage systems works Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N ACt ISN DETAIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will be protected from flooding by ensuring drainage systems operate well Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: Annual ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 68 1 If" ,n g mi uuuuD���u11AaNN 1I11111nnN4i,INVNA�uNp�1�V1111NNYQYhtlVldll ,111 1,111,11 Ilint pl[y.milliii,111111111!!om,F lu 11111111111'1111111111(1 Proposed Action Implement an annual program for clearing debris from bridges, drains and culverts INF ORM A' Site and Location: Carreta creek watershed Risk Reduction Benefit: Reduce vulnerability to flooding by ensuring that drainage systems work as they should Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATION ACTIN E- AIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will be protected Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: 2 years NC RP RATION INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 69 lPage uuuD�� u�yuAaNN 11,11nnn4L,IN'NuNA�uN N�N�V�rNNYQYNtl1INI'Ii uuuu l'h11N(11NNpi�aNN1mpp'11"n;"tltll� W'1.01111 SVoi 1VUIuuUllllipg�i� Proposed Action Store books, manuals, permits, and other critcal government records on the upper floor (s) and/or on shelves above the base flood elevations. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: City facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Imported documents will be protected from floodwaters Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTH AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flooding Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impacts to new or existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Secretary Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 70 lPage nnn��I NuNAuH ph��u11NNH1YhhVlull 9 '' '111., I�II��p199�uR�d�? Proposed Action Join the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Provide flood insurance for property in Bishop. New development will conform to NFIP standards. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing development will benefit from both the availability of flood insurance and NFIP standard Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 71 1Page Proposed Action uu I� �9�y4y�lll �1�� I� , i iuil lluuuuu ' " 111111 1111111111111�i li lil llli���� �i�liiii' 11iiis 11111000001111"0111111111111111111101011101(1100 �I III/IIII ll�lllJ,,''"'7s°IM' ®,�� r !afi,'� es�lil dddd ilii Work with neighboring communities to establish common watershed planning directives INFORMAL Site and Location: Watershed -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Watershed wide planning directives will ensure that sound planning practices are not undermined by poor planning practices elsewhere in the watershed Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations .04111, ATI N ACTIN f TAIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from sound watershed -wide planning practices Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 72 1Page I0I000 l;IIII)))))))I,,.,„ Yllllllllll11111111 IHP'* 4INJIUI i illI0 mut I 1001.1100"'"0"0"0 0"0"II Proposed Action Prepare and advertise the local emergency evacuation plan, such as escape routes, in coordination with Dept. of Transportation INFORMAL Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Evacuation education will reduce the population's vulnerability to flooding hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness Mr, GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact to new and existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NCORP( RATIONI T LANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 73 1 If" ,n uliiD�1N�suy�uAa�N�iinnn��ly�NuNA�111 �q III NNIS ��I,'�if II'�f��fiifi�ffffffffidffiiff! Proposed Action Update public community facilities to include severe weather action plans and designated tornado shelter areas „A „NFOIMAI Site and Location: Community facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Community facilities with severe weather action plans and tornado shelter areas will provide the public with safe locations during hazard events Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact to new and existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 74 1 If" ,n 4illuD>,I 111usuy�AaNN f(I nnn��I NuN411uH1111N�NNH4YhtlVld°I'l Proposed Action 1111 1 1111111111111111111111114444dllldl IIS � i� id iq iiii� I IIS Idddd'l„�'!� Purchase NOAA "All Hazards” radios for early warning and post -event information and place in area schools/businesses/critical facilities INFOIMAI Site and Location: Critical facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: NOAA weather radios will allow critical facilities to prepare for natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTH AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, Floods, Windstorms, Lightning, Tornado, Hailstorms, Dam and Levee Failure, Wildfire, Winter Storms, and Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact to new or existing buildings. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $150 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 75 lPage ugpiD�� N����NNuAaNN 0 INinnn�11,IN'�NuNA�uN NrN1I�[1N pYNN1IuQi ll, 11'111111111110 .1 .1 'Illillilf'111,11'11111111;11111111.1111,[1:111.111 Proposed Action Review damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures as determined appropriate incorporating the use of an Asset Management System. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: City-wide; City -facilities Risk Reduction Benefit: Updating management practices will reduce vulnerabilities to natural hazards. An asset management system will allow for the systematic and efficient management of assets, reducing their vulnerability to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: An asset management system will allow for better management of assets in new or existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 76 1page nnn�;11iv HuHA110H 1wH11nn1l? 01H�iuW!!', J' 1���ci w0 IIII N 111. i1I11111I� B�IIII91'J'I'J'1 Ldi Proposed Action 11 ,Laion ii IIIIImIIII�ommo�oIIIt ii� 1111111111 Special Needs Public Education and Outreach fNFOFMAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Community -wide An educated public is less vulnerable to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DE- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impacts to new or existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 77 1 If" ,n IN'gi1 11nliigN��N1111' 1II [11fl `II0 lIIIII11��I��IIIII' Proposed Action 1u„II,,,� �I 99'PIPI'll' il'lii III I� Y a III dads I 00 .ai, III li tldu l tl 1, Public Education programs to educate population on dangers and mitigation options. INFOIMAI Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: An educated public will be less vulnerable to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact to new or existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 78 1 If” ,n y111u�I�say��Aa�� � nnu�11iv H�NA�, llu�wNHHi�nn�iul Proposed Action yovoyovv0000lomesol" PI 1111111111111111111111111 NII II 9UIII;I!li00000000000-00000000,, uui 'III"G'�u 11 I 1111 IIIIIIIIII�IVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIVI III It dl II, llk;l;"Ilhlii Community Wildfire Risk Assessment INFO MAI Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A community that has an accurate understanding of its wildfire vulnerability will be better able to understand how to respond to the natural hazard Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f TAIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from a better understanding of wildfire hazards Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 79 1Page ugpiND�� N���NNN�AaNN 'j nnn�1IN'�NuNA�uNgyrNrN1[1N pYNNliii Proposed Action tit 111 1 p� D10/Gu 'I QII��I IIII IIVullllllll ilIIv Hil Community Wildfire Protection Plan update INFORMAL Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A community that has an accurate understanding of its wildfire vulnerability will be better able to understand how to respond to the natural hazard Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness MITIGA11bN ACTh AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from a better understanding of wildfire hazards Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 80 lPage ugpi,11,111�.����NuAaNNoV INinnp1iII NuNA�uN NrNH?N pYNNVIuQi iF I i,rr0�I1Iui y��p,_. I�.a rii i iuu1I uiu Proposed Action Conduct public education program on fire risks and wildland fire mitigation, with the assistance of the Texas Forest Service. INFO I MAl Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: An educated public will be better able to respond to the dangers of wildfire hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTT N f TAIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing building will benefit from the improved knowledge of the wildfire -educated public Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 81 1 If" ,n y1u�,11ay��Aa��nnn�11iHuNA11N1111111(�u�wNHH��nn1iulIII!!�;�;�������°°��""DEW ill'Il1111:11111111111111,0i1i111111111111111II11111111111ililligo li uulilI''''"'' Proposed Action LaionIt 11111111111111111111111 lll;llldl i Creation of Master Drainage Plan for implementation fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Improved stormwater management standards will reduce the community's vulnerability to water - related natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the improved stormwater management of a master drainage plan Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Secretary Implementation Schedule: 4 years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 82 1 If" ,n 11,1111, � � nnp111 11I NVNA1111111H ph�11111111NNY111113 11111.1J111.11) l►i'IIIIVV,���"I�����p aw� n ii 111111111114 III II VIIIIII y:i1 Proposed Action Obtain certification of communities by the National Weather Service as StormReady communities. INFOIMAI Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: A StormReady certification will indicate that the community has taken steps to reduce its vulnerability to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Terrorism, Hazardous Material Release, Pipeline Failure, Pandemic Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the community's certification as a StormReady community. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year INCORPO EXI"STING LANS ANLL PRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 83 1 If" ,n ugpi D�� i1,nnn4 I NNuHA�uH ph�II11NNY111YhhVldp pub Ib wT wO NQaCC Proposed Action Assess use performance/impact zoning to set risk- based standards for land development. Establish "agricultural use districts" in zoning ordinance to limit densities in known hazard areas. Establish procedure to utilize overlay zones for requiring mitigation techniques in high -hazard districts. A INFOI MAl Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Improved planning and zoning standards will reduce the exposure of people and property to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGAIII N ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Drought, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings, particularly new buildings, will benefit from improved planning and zoning standards. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Administrator Implementation Schedule: 2-3 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 84 lPage Il1u„1„Iiiiil �i Hell �� )1,110111 1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 Proposed Action Work with county, state and federal agencies to maintain up-to-date hazard data, maps, etc. i,A INFO MA Site and Location: Community -wide Risk Reduction Benefit: Accurate and up-to-date data and maps will allow the community to better understand the natural hazards the community faces Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings, especially new buildings, will benefit from updated hazard data and maps Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 2 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 85 1 If" ,n g e ugpi D�� �.�.1.1 „1N f nnn111 1I N1HA�uHgyrpr11[1N pYnnliiiii Ik uis 1111 Proposed Action Homo �II�I Retrofit fire facility to hazard -resistant levels fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Fire facility Risk Reduction Benefit: Retrofitting the fire facility will reduce the facility's vulnerability to natural hazards. Furthermore, a more hazard -resistant facility will be better able to protect citizens during a natural hazard. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from a more hazard -resistant fire facility Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Emergency Service District 3 Implementation Schedule: 4 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 86 lPage y�u��lay��Aa���nnn��ivNuNA�N�r��u�wNHH��nn�lullMI � �i+�����' " Proposed Action aN dulllllllldldVIIIIhlilliv �l lIIIIIIIIIImIIIIIIIIovIIIIImIIIIommIIIIIIIIo IIIJII 11fill 111 Install emergency generator for critical facility- city hall 1NFOI MA' Site and Location: City hall Risk Reduction Benefit: A generator -equipped city hall will be less vulnerable to natural hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from a generator -equipped city hall Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: 4 years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 87 lPage uludlU> p���N�l�AaYi CU nnno VPII1,1,111�yn111111 Proposed Action Install quick -connect emergency generator hook- ups for critical facility- school. INFOIMAI Site and Location: Schools Risk Reduction Benefit: Quick connect generators in schools will reduce the vulnerability of schools to natural hazards. Furthermore, generator -equipped schools would be better positioned to function as emergency shelters, should the need arise. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTH AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: No adverse impact on new and existing buildings Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Bishop ISD Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 88 lPage City of Corpus Christi Mitigation Actions 1111ii1i[ �uNuuq�i'pI�I��V�N��YNYVh Proposed Action 1111,11.11,1;111,11;1);11,11,11.00111,Ifilif)fii.)1):11,11.,,,ir 1011 11111111"11 "1'7' 1111111111,11111,,11111111111111111. 1111111111111111..1!..,111,....1.1111.111....! 11,1,11111111 11111111111111111110 111, 1111111111.111 Seawall Capital Improvement Projects for routine maintenance and restoration. .ACI INFORI Site and Location: Sewall in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Providing routine repairs help to defer major structural reconstruction efforts Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACt ION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of maintaining and restoring the seawall in Corpus Christi will protect existing buildings along the seawall and any new buildings being built from Hurricanes and Tropical Storms and Floods. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: CIP Project Funding and a sales tax adjustment Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-10 Years NC( RP( RATION INT' PLANS AND PFtOCEDURE � Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 89 1 If" ,n .,111111111 �nn�doiu��1111.1 11111111111111111111 Proposed Action Construction of a new bulkhead in Corpus Christi Bay along the south side shoreline of Corpus Christi. A INFORMAL Site and Location: South Side Shoreline in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Construct a new bulkhead along the south shoreline of the Science and History Museum eastward across the United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) property terminating at the northwest corner of the recently constructed bulkhead in front of the South Texas Art Museum. The low-lying areas on the USACE property and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority would be filled to an elevation approximately the same as that in front of the Art Museum. Area paving could be constructed between the new bulkhead and existing floodwall. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Deter coastal erosion and mitigation potential flooding of existing properties situation at the northern section of downtown Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $10,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Sales Tax Proceeds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 90 1 If" ,n Implementation Schedule: 4-10 Years INC RP( RATION INTO EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 91 1Page II q)010luyuAtl0,) '1,1Vntly1111111JIVNNNN�N '11h��NflIflIIVNI 1111 III 1111111111111111 vIIIII )) Proposed Action 11000000 o0000110)111 Make improvements to the Salt Flat Levee System. 1NFOI MA' Site and Location: Salt Flat Levee System in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Salt Flat Levee System is an integral component of the downtown flood protection system. The levee requires improvements and continued maintenance to ensure that the system will function as originally designed. Additional studies are underway and improvements are planned that would be sufficient to be certified by FEMA as a freeboard deficient reach. This means that although the system would not afford the level of protection required to prevent overtopping in a 100 -year event, it would not be vulnerable to a catastrophic failure. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: Improvements on the Salt Flat Levee system will help mitigate flooding of existing buildings situated in downtown Corpus Christi. Failure to achieve FEMA certification would greatly impact the City of Corpus Christi and downtown business insurance costs. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCO RPO I EXI 11N( NS ANDPFOCE Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 92 1 If" ,n Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 93 1Page u��'hh�pwwu�olltnVII'V ill 111,1,11;11..0111111 111 iy°111N��1�"pC! 11111111111111111 Proposed Action Make improvements to Power Street Pump Station. INFO ;NIA Site and Location: Power Street Pump Station in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Power Street pump station was originally constructed in 1947 as part of the bay front protection. It has 3 pumps with diesel powered motors. The Kinney Street pump station was also constructed in 1947. The pump station was reconstructed in 2009. It has 5 pumps with electric motors that are dependent on the 3 generators inside. One redundant pump is located on site. The downtown flood protection system relies on these two pump stations to remove all water from the area during a significant storm event. Preliminary studies have indicated that the pumping capacity would not be adequate to handle rainfall, inflow and wave overtopping during a 100 -year storm event. Planned 2D modeling will help to better define the demands that would be placed on the system during significant storm events. This project would enhance the reliability and capacity of the downtown storm system. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will improve operational efficiencies, save money on electrical costs, and help keep the downtown area from flooding during heavy rain conditions. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 94 1 If" ,n Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 95 1 If" a �Ninn� �NVNu�VN�1hiiflVil1NNYQ11h11111 !!Puiu j l Jr.. 1„1011��NP " 11 Proposed Action Update the Corpus Christi Stormwater Master Plan. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Corpus Christi City Council approved the Storm Water Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY99-00 on July 20, 1999 (Ordinance No. 023703). Included were separate projects for drainage studies in specific areas of the City. The need to integrate these individual drainage studies into a consistent, uniform analysis became evident and was approved in Storm Water CIP for FY00- 01, (Ordinance No. 024130). The City's use of master plans that date back to 1946, 1961, 1970, 1982, and 1988 resulted in the use of inconsistent criteria without an adopted level of protection policy. The separate projects are integrated into the FY00-01 Storm Water CIP as a Storm Water Master Plan Project. The Development of a comprehensive, updated, consistent Storm Water Master Plan based on an adopted Storm Water Criteria and Design Manual is necessary to respond to development, environmental issues and to better define and prioritize on going and future drainage capital improvement projects. The purposes of this project is as follows: a. Establish drainage criteria that reflects input from the different segments of the community (elected officials, developers, engineers, citizens, planning and zoning) and in the consensus process identify a "level of protection" for the City to be adopted as a standard for the City b. Adopt a drainage criteria and design procedure for designers to use in capital improvement projects and in the subdivision platting process of residential and commercial development c. Establish policy statements or guidelines that are responsive to storm water quality, storm water pollution prevention requirements, development issues for use in future street and drainage project design d. Develop a master plan to implement the drainage criteria established to include updates of the existing areas and production of new master plan for other areas. The master plan will include the inventory of all outfalls and data necessary for Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 96 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 97 1Page the design process and will utilize criteria and reflects the characteristics of each master plan Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATION ACTION f ETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Prioritization of major drainage improvements considering level of service and return on investment could greatly impact the operating budget and will help eliminate the flooding that impacts all of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $4,084,900 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORP( RATION INT O EXIST ING PLANS AND PF OC URE Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 97 1Page Bio MMtll°090Pyu11i111u1p°°NpNI'NNNiiiiiiiIIIIIIuUl����,�u 11111 1„"111111, Proposed Action Excavate silt and debris in Drainage Master Channel 31 caused by the erosion on sides and bottom of the Drainage Master Channel 31. Site and Location: Drainage Master Channel 31 in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Master Channel 31 was constructed in various phases in conjunction with the development in the area. The side slopes and bottom are severely eroded resulting in poor drainage and encroachment of ditch outside of the City right-of- way. This project will provide critical improvements to restore and improve the drainage profile and include erosion control measures such as side slope stabilization, soil treatment, vegetative cover and other best management practices. This project is planned in multiple phases as funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure M ITIGA11C N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,819,800 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 98 1 If" ,„n g („ Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department Implementation Schedule: 3-4 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 99 1Page uuiU.,I��1)flIuy��Aa�Na1)nnn4 IV�NuHA11uHph��VN1[NNHpYhhVldll! i, 1n w�'���� Proposed Action Improvements to side slopes on Schanen Ditch to eliminate erosion problems. fNFOIMATI Site and Location: Schanen Drainage Ditch in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The existing profile of Schanen Ditch exceeds the recommended slope of 4:1 and maximum of 3:1. This is resulting in major slope stabilization failure in multiple areas near the Yorktown Bridge. Work to improve this ditch will include excavation/backfill to widen and create 3:1 side slopes with stabilization matting, new culvert and outfalls, riprap and ditch bottom improvements, seeding, irrigation adjustments, traffic controls, dewatering and other miscellaneous items. Construction of Phase 1 of this project has been recently completed and future phases will be completed to the extent that funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTION f E7'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of channels and ditches is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,756,100 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department Implementation Schedule: 3-4 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 100 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 101 1Page lulUoollooAW1111r0n111nnn,u,11111I1111131pliiririririrli „Iv H 10. [o 1,1il1ra11I1111 11,I 111111111m� .111 11".!111111111111111111[111 Proposed Action La Voila Creek Channel Excavation (Phase 1) ACI INFORI Site and Location: La Voila Creek in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: This project will involve the improvement of La Voila Creek that crosses SH 357 (Saratoga Blvd). The project will provide 100 -year capacity for conveyance to the Oso Creek. Phase 1 Channel improvements include the removal of vegetation from the channel North of Saratoga Boulevard and channel widening South of Saratoga Boulevard. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN AC"I IEI111 DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of channels and ditches is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $4,152,800 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Stormwater Department 1-2 Years NCCRP(RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 102 lPage Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 103 1Page yl� AJlyj�(inntl411IV'G'IHVNu�VNgh�h11i�1NH11�Yhhlii,, o e I II uu fl Proposed Action Participate in the FEMA Flood Map Modernization Process. Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Federal Emergency Management Agency's Multi -Hazard Flood Map Modernization Program will update and digitize flood hazard maps across the nation. Most the City of Corpus Christi's FIRMs are nearly 20 years old. It is in the interest of the City and its residents for the maps, which determine flood insurance premiums, to be accurate and up-to-date. Other planning and hazard mitigation benefits are expected to accrue as well. The City of Corpus Christi is currently working through the appeals process of the map modernization Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATI bACTIN E- AIL N Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Increased participation in available flood insurance. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services 1-2 Years NCORP( RATION INT 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 104 1Page ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 105 1Page yru��ai,"n a �M�r��u�INHH� �ppppVuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu° Proposed Action Improve the City's CRS rating from a Class 7 to a Class 5. Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Corpus Christi has participated in the CRS program since 1991 and is currently rated as a Class 7 community, entitling its residents to a 15% discount on flood insurance premiums. This project is intended to improve its rating to a Class 5, thereby increasing the premium discount by an additional 10% for Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Other actions identified in this Mitigation Plan will have a direct bearing on fulfilling CRS requirements to qualify for the higher classification. This activity includes a comprehensive review of eligible activity requirements, identification of additional potential actions, monitoring completion of previously identified actions, and completing the application process. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGA11bN ACTION f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Increased participation in available flood insurance. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services 1-2 Years !NCO PO EXI TING P NS ANDPFIOCE CRS Program, Floodplain Regulations, and Stormwater Regulations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 106 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 107 1Page llilu��say��Aa�� � inn°1.11.; A� N �r��u�wNHH��nn�iu Proposed Action Build the Catulla Reservoir in the upper reaches of the Nueces River which would include a pipeline to divert water directly into Choke Canyon Reservoir. A INFO MATT Site and Location: Upper Reaches of Nueces River Risk Reduction Benefit: The Corps of Engineers studied the Cotulla Reservoir site, located in the upper Nueces Basin, in the 1960's. The recent Nueces River Basin Reconnaissance Study identified a potentially down -sized version of this project, including a pipeline to divert water directly into Choke Canyon Reservoir. In addition to the flood damage reduction potential for Lake Corpus Christi and the lower river basin, this project would enhance the regional water supply by increasing water storage capacity, and reducing losses associated with downstream evaporation across an 81 mile braided reach. During Phase 1 of the Feasibility Study, existing data will be reviewed to estimate the flood damage reduction potential of the project: a. A preliminary hydrologic analysis to determine the portion of the volume of historical lower- basin floods that originate upstream of Cotulla will be performed. b. A review of existing map information of the Nueces River for a 25 -mile reach downstream of the proposed reservoir to identify areas that could benefit from the potential flood damage reduction potential of the reservoir will be performed. c. Data from FEMA and other agencies on historical flood damages will be summarized. (Phase 2) Depending on the findings of the flood damage analyses, a daily flow flood model may need to be developed to evaluate the downstream flood damage reduction potential in terms of magnitude and frequency for the Cotulla Diversion Project. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 108 lPage MITIGATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods, Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Mitigate life-threatening hazards to buildings within the upper reaches of the Nueces River, while providing for a source of surface water to avoid disruption to essential utilities, eliminate the risk of potential economic loses. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $445,000 Potential Funding Sources: USACE will cover 50% and Non -Federal Sponsors will cover the remaining 50%. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Summer of 2018 INC RP( RATION INTd EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Nueces River Basin Reconnaissance Study ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 109 lPage I!Ii1I1JilluI h l91IIIIII Proposed Action Implementation of a Desalination Program Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi's Desalination Program is a progressive and proactive step to begin determining the feasibility of developing a drought proof future water supply using brackish groundwater and seawater. The City of Corpus Christi has secured grant funds from the US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) to assist with this project and will have expert technical resources with Reclamation providing their experience and guidance. The City has already secured $400,000 in grant funding for this project from Reclamation. This program will provide the City with the reliability, security, sustainability and availability of brackish groundwater and seawater as possible future water sources. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN ACTIN f TAILti Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: The desalination program can be a secure source of freshwater to avoid disruption to essential utilities, eliminate the risk of potential economic loses. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $2,859,400 Potential Funding Sources: Water operation funds, raw water supply fund and bureau of Reclamation grant. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi 1-2 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 110 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 111 lPage liiD>�u��u�y�uAa�l0i1.,1nnn11,l111N'�NuNA�uNNhN�IV[1NpYNNVIN Q u11+?MNN'N�Ni • pip lily Air • " dodpp W9 Proposed Action Make improvements to the instrumentation system at Wesley Seale Dam. A INF OI MAl Site and Location: Wesley Seale Dam in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: This project provides for improvements to the original instrumentation system including annual safety inspection, integration with O.N. Stevens WTP process controls, The Howell-Bunger Valve, the downstream sluice gates, and the dewatering system, in response to previous inspections and priority investment recommendations into the system. This project will protect the integrity of the Wesley Seale Dam system (1957), to provide for proper inspection and updated regulatory reports per TCEQ. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods; Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will ensure the City can provide reservoir supplies to its customers and other downstream water right -holders and will secure the structural integrity of the dam through established dam safety protocols. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,850,600 Potential Funding Sources: Revenue Bond Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department 3-4 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 112 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 113 lPage 0.D.V.V1'l!1,1f1suyiAaN lir nnV�I NuNA11uHp�11111VNNNH4Yupn.h.l'! Proposed Action Maintain and adopt most current building codes. A INFOI MATT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi has adopted, with local amendments, the Building Codes effective September 1, 2016, The International Code Council (ICC), 2015 editions of the International Building Code, Existing Building Code, Energy Conservation Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code for One- and Two -Family Dwellings and the National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) National Electric Code. The International Building Codes are always being updated to provide better protection by utilizing the best construction practices. The City of Corpus Christi will be periodically updating the codes with code cycles that become available. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans Regulations A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Land Subsidence. Effect on new/existing buildings: By maintaining the most update building codes, the city is requiring that construction adhere to the most stringent codes, thus helping to reduce potential loses if exposed to a hazard. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/ Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 114 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 115 lPage 2-3 Years INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 115 lPage uuuuD��u�u�y�AaNN� jnnn��lV�NuHA�uHph��V��NNY�YhhVlgll�J����M�;�� r IdPOOVVvUlIII VOV1111.0.01.111 011111111 1IJJII VVJ1111(00111 Proposed Action Make improvements to the side seals on the Wesley Seale Dam Spillway to maintain the spillway's integrity. A INFOI MAl Site and Location: Wesley Seale Dam in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Wesley Seals Dam has 60 crest gates located in two separate spillways: the south spillway includes 27 gates and the north spillway includes 33 gates. Over the years, leakage from the side seals has increased and it has become significant at several of the gates. The water flow from the excessive leakage damages the concrete and encourages algae and other vegetative growth and leads to corrosion issues on the gates, metal appurtenances and reinforcing steel. This project provides for the necessary improvements including seal replacement, miscellaneous structural repairs and application of a protective coating system for the Dam. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATION ACTI N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: This project will increase the service life of the structure and prevent future corrosion, subsequent section loss and connection deterioration which will potentially lower the probability of increased flooding. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $22,800,000 Potential Funding Sources: Revenue Bond Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Corpus Christi Water Department Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 116 lPage Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 117 1 If" a 4-10 Years INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 117 1 If" a uuliu{yl� s ���;u�a�N �1 1'1 PI'P�fl�N11f 11�11111 Ii l)!� ��9u111.)dual�h 11111111111.1111c!il 1q11 , Ha'111111:1(.11,111,11011011.111.111111J1111)111 . � m� puug Proposed Action 11111.11):1'11'11.11,1:1„11„11111111111.111.1:11.111i; !!!!a?( " Build a floodwall along Corpus Christi Bay at the Science and Natural History Museum. ACKGR UND IN:FORI Site and Location: Corpus Christi Bay near the Science and Natural History Museum in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Recommendation to construct a new floodwall (or a coastal structure) that would follow a "hypotenuse" alignment between the existing Promenade and the USACE Bulkhead. The project would also backfill the triangle to make it function more like a coastal structure. This would also provide additional land area for future use. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of building a flood wall will help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the downtown area of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $3,5000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years INCORPO EXI TING PL N` ANDPFOCE Capital Improvements Plan Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 118 1Page ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 119 1Page � �Nhfl�N�NflNN� ��� N� iggq�ll raw � �IIIII ,I IIII Proposed Action Make improvements to the erosion on sides and bottom of Drainage Master Channel 31. fNFOI MAli Site and Location: Drainage Master Channel 31 in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Master Channel 31 was constructed in various phases in conjunction with the development in the area. The side slopes and bottom are severely eroded resulting in poor drainage and encroachment of ditch outside of the City right-of- way. This project will provide critical improvements to restore and improve the drainage profile and include erosion control measures such as side slope stabilization, soil treatment, vegetative cover and other best management practices. This project is planned in multiple phases as funding allows. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Structure and Infrastructure A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Certificates of Obligation Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Developmen Services Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 120 1page INCORPORATIONI T ISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvements Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 121 1Page i �� ui u�a �ni�iNi Nid hn� �I' 1111 mu 1101111 Ili1.010 looljl)„, 4 001 �r mo1011010011pillil 11111111 MI' 11 Proposed Action Utilize the city adopted "Developer Agreement" tha the can use with developers to help cover the cos of installing over -sized stormwater drainage. ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Under the platting ordinance, the City of Corpus Christi participates with developers on utility construction for over -sized main stormwater lines. These funds may also be used to address development drainage concerns. This project will provide for the City's share of such projects, as necessary, up to the approved amount. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure min GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements to Drainage Master Channel 31 will regain the carrying capacity of the channel and help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the area of Corpus Christi this channel is supposed to help. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $3,100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Development Services Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Stormwater Master Plan and Regulations Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 122 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 123 1Page II�i0000ii gNNhN� mill "11 'f 1 Proposed Action Mill eiiipiiliovoyoyoW UIIIVIIUpUU 00 000 I„..1111.011111 1100001010101000 ,0000010 00:g°1°11100111110,1011010 0.,1000c00;01.1,10,11.1i0 Complete an assessment of the needed repairs and improvements on all 8 major and 100 mino stormwater outfalls that drain into Corpus Christi Bay. ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: There are eight major storm water outfalls and more than 100 other outfalls that allow runoff to drain into Corpus Christi Bay. In 2003, 13.5 miles of these outfall structures were inspected and improvements and repairs were made to four outfalls. The purpose of this current project is to provide an updated assessment, which may include the Brawner/proctor and Gollihar outfalls and other outfalls, pending results of the initial assessment, and providing recommendations for repairs, improvements, and rehabilitation as necessary. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N ACt ISN DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of the storm water conveyance systems is critical to avoid potential "washouts" that may result in encroachment, flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $2,447,200 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 124 1 If" ,n g 000000 Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Engineering Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 125 1Page ������pilU�J V�u��?�NAa�N �ry� unnnN�IH.;1.1m�h�NNNp�NN�Yhhul�°;� Proposed Action Complete a feasibility study of Oso Creek at the confluence of La Volta Creek to determine if any construction projects will help the creek conveyance capacity during high flow events. A fNFORMA,. Site and Location: Oso Creek in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The drainage profiles of Oso Creek east of the La Volta Creek confluence show several constrictions that impact the base flood elevations upstream. This project will investigate the feasibility of the construction of additional creek conveyance capacity for high flow events. If the investigation shows a significant potential to impact the base flood elevation, then construction will be completed in those areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATI ON ACTI N (DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Restoration of the storm water conveyance of Oso Creek is critical to avoid potential rising surface water elevations that would result in encroachment flooding and undermining of adjacent public/private structures including streets, bridges, utility lines, buildings, and homes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $4,715,400 Potential Funding Sources: Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Storm Water Department and Engineering Department Implementation Schedule: 4-5 Years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 126 1page INCORPORATIONI T ISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 127 lPage UNNN� NYY�� ����������I�luuu�luuuuuuuum I�I�IU I� Proposed Action Have ISO conduct another assessment to see if the City has done enough improvements to its building department to gain a better BCEGS rating. A INFOI MATT Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) is an independent organization that administers the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BECGS) to assess "the building codes in effect in a particular community and how the community enforces its building codes, with special emphasis on mitigation of losses from natural hazards." The grading can influence the cost of insurance coverage in the community. Since its last assessment, the City of Corpus Christi has adopted the 2015 International Building Code and the 2016 International Residential Code for One and Two Family Dwellings, among others, and should be eligible for an improved grade. This activity includes scheduling a re -assessment and compiling the necessary documentation. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATION ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Land Subsidence. Effect on new/existing buildings: Public participation in available insurance discount options on Homeowners insurance policies. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Cost/ Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 128 lPage Implementation Schedule: 1-2 Years INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Building Code Regulations; CRS; Floodplain Regulations ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 129 1 If" a �IiuD����IuyNAaNN���nnn��lV�NuNA�uHph1,VN�NNH�YhhVldllIpIII. � 1,1,1il1111 Proposed Action Implement a multi -hazard public awareness program. A INFOIMATI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The City of Corpus Christi has seen multiple hazards occur within the years past. Most residents are heavily informed of what to do during heavy rains, tropical storms and hurricanes. However, there are multiple hazards that are not as frequent. The City will be working towards creating and disseminating a pamphlet(s) that will cover what to do before, during and after the following hazards: Extreme Heat, Lighting, Hailstorm, Hurricane and Tropical Storms, Windstorms, Tornados, Drought, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure, Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence and Wildfires Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Education and Awareness MITIGA14bN ACTION f ETAILti Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire. Effect on new/existing buildings: Homeowners will know what types of mitigations actions they can do to protect their lives and properties from the hazard risks. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services and Office of Emergency Management Implementation Schedule: Create Year 1, Review and Administer Annually Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 130 1page INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E CRS ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 131 lPage uuill���JRVA°1N��+WWII'hi�I����4�NI"ryhuu�ipP1dN,Pd�,I,'11.111111111 1 NN�0.'�°H p1PRRN1111 1111111.1.1. 11,111,11'11'011,111 ivvv. ologooloopoi Proposed Action Map and assess the vulnerabilities the city may face for Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence, and Wildfires ACI INFORI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Improve data and mapping on specific risks for coastal erosion, expansive soils, land subsidence and wildfires. Use GIS to identify and map erosion areas, riparian landslides, expansive soils and wildfires. Develop and maintain a database to track vulnerability and indicate where critical structures and any development is located in relation to the hazardous areas. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATION ACTI N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Coastal Erosion, Expansive Soils, Land Subsidence, Wildfires Effect on new/existing buildings: By identifying the hazards, the city can provide advice as to previous hazards for future construction or preservation purposes. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Cost/Staff time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services and GIS Implementation Schedule: 1-2 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T L 3 AND PI OC URE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 132 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 133 1Page uiIIJD>1 Vuiuy�AaNN a nnpI�I NNuNA uN 1111111111111,I.,.11,..,.114..1.1„.1,1.11,11.. Proposed Action Installation of groins and/or breakwaters to the areas behind the bulkhead to retrofit the areas that are eroding. ACKGR UND IN:F( RI Site and Location: Cole Park in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Coastal Erosion in Corpus Christi Bay is a serious issue. Prevention of further erosion of the shoreline at Cole Park, which is along Corpus Christi Bay through the installation of groins and/or breakwaters. Cole Park is a high use park with the city. The area behind the bulkhead is eroding and needs to be retrofitted. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITIGATI N ACTION f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate $500,000 - $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Potential funding from the Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Program (CEPRA) and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Parks Department Implementation Schedule: 24-30 Months Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 134 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 135 1Page III u� �l�s NAY �II� II flllu uuuNluiN n 1111m n n Proposed Action ,4IllviiI omIIo IIvIIulu „ fig I111100000011 1111111111111 ts bi p oiuui IIII Adopt a local lightning ordinance for non-residential structures that are over 50' in height. A INFOr IMAI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: Currently, the City of Corpus Christi does not have an ordinance that requires lighting protection for commercial structures; but, instead provides guidelines if property owners choose to add the protection. The City of Corpus Christi will be considering adopting local language that would require commercial structures over 50 feet to have adequate lighting protection. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Lightning Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: By adopting this type of higher standard in the city building codes, we are adding additional protection that can possibly reduce the risk for damages. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Costs/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Implementation Schedule: 12-18 Months NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 136 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 137 1Page lgldl IIi�N�� llllvplllpl� 11,111111.11111„ i�111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IJJi1111fri��ll Proposed Action Adopt a local ordinance requiring all habitable structures to have air conditioning. A INFOr IMAI Site and Location: City of Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The International Building Codes do not require a habitable space to be air conditioned, but instead requires for it to be heated. The City of Corpus Christi will be considering adopting language that would require all habitable spaces to have adequate air condition to reduce the effects that extreme heat has on the city's population. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Extreme Heat Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: By requiring habitable spaces to be air conditioned, it will provide for added protection for the building occupant in the event of an extreme heat event. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Low Costs/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: Local Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Development Services Implementation Schedule: 12-24 Months INCORPO EXI"STING PLANS ANLL PRICE Building Codes Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 138 1 If" ,n ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 139 1Page II IIIU,If IVJJIk' idll 1 1:H111011DH ,00lifilli11,111,1111111111111,1 OIL u Proposed Action Design and implement a dam breach study for dams in Corpus Christi. ACKGR UND INFORI Site and Location: Barney M Davis Cooling Reservoir Dam, Calallen Reservoir Dam, Oso Municipal Golf Course Lake Dam Risk Reduction Benefit: Better hazard -related information will improve the disaster resilience of the community. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from improved hazard information Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Nueces County Public Works Department Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCOF RI F ATION INT L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< Petronila Creek Water Restoration and Protection Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 140 1 If" ,n City of Driscoll Mitigation Actions uuuiD11,11V�y�AaNN �� nnn4,64 Lltl�NuNA��N tl�tl�V��NNY4Ytltl1ld"I'I i!° Proposed Action Ntl�����tltl! u i ii! i"IIIIIIII911� 111001101010101000010111 i.1.0111„1„.1.1h!lj„,,j Jj.Jiiiiiii1J,11.1..„111011„1„,„11111111111111111101,11.„1„„„„„JJJJJJJJJJJ,JJ' Implement an annual program for clearing debris from bridges, drains and culverts ,ACI INFORI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIG#TIbN AC1 h AIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: Annual INCORPO EXI"STING LANS ANLL PROCE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 141 1 If" ,n uuuuD>� uu�y�AaNN I1,11nn1,111000 , NVNu�VN p���i��NNYQ�hV��dll „ iii,110000000000 011 11000 0110 Proposed Action ooio119 II ligliggi10011011 I I00'000000 Implement an annual program for clearing debris from bridges, drains and culverts fNFOI'MAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: 2 years NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 142 1 If" ,n y1u��sa���Aa���;;nnn�11iH�NA�N�r��u�wNHH��nn�iul?IN„,;q'' r�� ��� 11991111...giiiiii9""" Proposed Action Store books, manuals, permits, and other critical government records on the upper floor (s) and/or on shelves above the base flood elevations. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness gill GAll N AC.1I Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Administrator Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATION INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 143 1 If” ,n uliuD����suy�AaNN���nnn��INuHA�uHph��VN�NNH4YhtlV�dl'!'�����"u��NIN��'Ch9'''i'i��, uuuuuuuuuuu������ Proposed Action l Join the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTH Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 144 lPage 1 1111 ngnn�Hulilmi Proposed Action 1111111 0001111111111111111 b1 ,11,111 l Work with neighboring communities to establish common watershed planning directives Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MM. GATI. bN AC.1I Flooding Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATION INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 145 1 If" a III�II��� � �l�illlllllllllllll' Yllllllllll11111111 Proposed Action dew o 1111111 Prepare and advertise the local emergency evacuation plan, such as escape routes, in coordination with Dept. of Transportation INFOIMAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTI+ 'AIL; Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 146 1 I" ,n D�1 N�'�suy�NAaNN � nnp�iNuNA�u NhNdNIINNNIYNNVIN'II IIiiii:ilN SII n'N 'N�� � '111111111111111111111'ilicliViiiimm11,11,01111111(1'1111111111111111111111111 1N N'I'NA Proposed Action 111NN111111111,111,111,1111111111�irl I�EI�EE,1� „EiEE�NNN 1i1IIIIIIIII �1111I�II���1� 11� uiui uiuu I uuu 11 III 11111 I III`, �, uu,ll' i;llll Update public community facilites to include severe weather action plans and designated tornado shelter areas Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 147 1 If" ,n NuHA��H1111N�NNHuYhtl��d'Il 101111111111 11:10:1 Proposed Action 1111111 11110II11111I11111 Purchase NOAA "All Hazards" radios for early warning and post -event information and place in area schools/businesses/critical facilities l Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Mfr. GA11bN' AP .1 Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, Floods, Windstorms, Lightning, Tornado, Hailstorms, Dam and Levee Failure, Wildfire, Winter Storms, and Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $150 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 148 1 If" ,n uliuD����suyuAaNN�iinnn��I;NuHA11uHph��VN�NNH�Yhh�ldllIp�wu��'�� 1111111.1111111111,111 Proposed Action ' I il�lllll 1111111.. Review damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures as determined appropriate incorporating the use of an Asset Management System. A fNFOFRMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness WTI, ATI N AC AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 149 1 If" ,n ,nnV�1111'�HVNu�VN��1111h1101NH11111Yhh1ii,,ol Proposed Action Special Needs Public Education and Outreach INF0I MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTT N f TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 150 lPage ! I�'uu�y�,N'igi�l N! NN �Nlhlh °��IIII� Yllllllllll11111111 iloolillooll'0111 ; mi,gt,iolololvivillill11111111,111111111111111111111 Proposed Action Public Education programs to educate population on dangers and mitigation options. INFORMAL Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTIN f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 151 1 If" ,n y111u��say��Aa�� � nnn�11i H�NA�, llu�wNHHi�nn�iul Proposed Action Community Wildfire Risk Assessment Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 152 lPage 1.111.111111��11.11uy�NAa1N � 11nnn11111I NuNA11uH ph��VN�NNH�YhhVld fiva .", „1 �%gal Proposed Action Community Wildfire Protection Plan update Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI All N ACTIN E- AIL Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 153 1 If" a uulD>1���suy�NAJ�NH�nnp11l111111NVNu1VNgnph11iflipNNH111Yhh1ldllI III n,i� lYhl1;llll1111l11.1lUl i'yiN"',NM ,II� Proposed Action Conduct public education program on fire risks and wildland fire mitigation, with the assistance of the Texas Forest Service. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTH Wildfire Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year NCORP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 154 lPage My1) u��iay��Aa�� il �� nnn� 1111 HuNA11N �r��ulijii, Proposed Action Creation of Master Drainage Plan for implementation Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/City Administrator Implementation Schedule: 4 years NCCRP(RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS ANID PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 155 1 Ii" ,n uuuly��u�uNNAN�Aa�N I1,11nnp� 1INNVNu�uNgyhNhN101NNY111YNNVIN Qo 1.11) ii IIIIVV,"V uN �" Y� p N 1111111111111111111111 Proposed Action Obtain certification of communities by the Natonal Weather Service as "Storm Ready" communities. INFORMA, Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA11bN ACTION f ET`AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Terrorism, Hazardous Material Release, Pipeline Failure, Pandemic Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 year ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 156 1page Proposed Action Mai �i���� Assess use performance/impact zoning to set risk- based standards for land development. Establish "agricultural use districts" in zoning ordinance to limit densities in known hazard areas. Establish procedure to utilize overlay zones for requiring mitigation techniques in high -hazard districts. Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Drought, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Mayor/Council/City Administrator Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Implementation Schedule: 2-3 years Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 157 1 If" ,n e 11.'., Yd.1 uM Proposed Action ugfl;4fll�ii �� III1,1111111J111111'1"1,111111)111111111111111111111111111.111.1„,1111111;!1111.111.111,1 tO Work with county, state and federal agencies to maintain up-to-date hazard data, maps, etc. fNF0I MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATII N ACTT N E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 2 years NC RP RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 158 lPage ugpi D�� a�N '; nnn� 1I NNuHA�uHgy11ph11[1N 111Yhhliiiii Proposed Action Retrofit fire facility to hazard -resistant levels fNFOI MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATII N ACTT N E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Emergency Service District 3 Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC RP RATION IN1- EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 159 lPage u�ay��a���nnn� �ivHuNA-N�r��u�wNHHn1iu � i�11�'0 Proposed Action Install emergency generator for critical facility - police dispatch/city hall Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Public Works/Nueces County/TXDOT Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC RP RATION INT' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 160 lPage uudlU� p���N�l�AaY CU Vnnno�VPII1,1,11V�y�1,111 ��N 01011011010000000000014 00001000000000 1111111i VVVVIIf! ,!!041101 Vili 'i Proposed Action Install quick -connect emergency generator hook- ups for critical facility- school. INFORMAL Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATII N ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Driscoll CISD Implementation Schedule: 4 years NC RP RATION INT'' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 161 1 If" ,n City of Petronila Mitigation Actions 'uyuAa11 ; nnn11,„11H1HA�HH ph1Nuil?NNYpulu,,,,ll r1' Proposed Action 1:11:11 i'llir011011011olhvv Install highwater markers for motorist direction at low areas of City roadways. A INFO.I MA. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Flooding High Estimated Cost: $2,500 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 162 lPage uliuD����suyNAaNN�iinnn��INuHA�u" ph��VNNNlhhVld! I!P ��J�ww�� 11 11 , fin. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 1111111111111111 Proposed Action Provide additional means of access into single- entry neighborhoods in order to prevent residents from becoming trapped in a hazardous area during a flood i,A INFO MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Flooding Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $30,000 Potential Funding Sources: CO/Street Bonds Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCCRP( RATION INT' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 163 1 If" ,n y��U�uJ���NAaNN( II. °pinll� lIII V11114uu Proposed Action VI11,„IC'i�� 11111 11 711101001„„,1 olloo ii�111111111111111 I�V10,11 II Implement an annual program for clearing debris from bridges, drains and culverts AC. INFORI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Flooding Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 164 1 If" ,n ugpi D,111N�1,4y�uAa�N f1.,11nnn�l11l NNuNA�uN ph��V��NNY�Yhh113 Proposed Action 1uuoN w1J� Ipn Doommoloolloll Store books, manuals, permits, and other critical government records on the upper floor (s) and/or on shelves above the base flood elevations. ACKGR( UNCI INFORI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Flooding Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 165 lPage 1,1 ; nnn� �i HuNA� N��r1r�Nl olvvmoll .RM n rMin 1I ” lldiol Proposed Action Work with neighboring communities to establish common watershed planning directives AC. INFORI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness WTI 'N ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Flooding Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 166 lPage 1,N�� �i'l tlii 111I flV'..; I��N�N���flfl�N�QYh�dn �i, YO lao iPn.iij9 MI II1 .1111 11111111111111111 Proposed Action 100 6 m Prepare and advertise the local emergency evacuation plan, such as escape routes, in coordination with Dept. of Transportation INFO MA Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Annual NCCRP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 167 1 If" ,n 1Ift 1111 Proposed Action Update public community facilfes to include severe weather action plans and designated tornado shelter areas Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTT AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wind Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 168 lPage a���innn4�iHuHA��H 1r11i��Np�nnmul�"��"�I nrm Proposed Action Purchase NOAA "All Hazards' radios for early warning and post -event information and place in area schools/businesses/critical facilities (UFO I MA Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGAIII N ACTION DE7AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, Floods, Windstorms, Lightning, Tornado, Hailstorms, Dam and Levee Failure, Wildfire, Winter Storms, and Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $150 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 Year NCCRP( RATIONI T ' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 169 lPage uul D>1 11111.11uy�NAa1NH nnn111111lV�NVNA11VN1111 N�NNHIYIIIIIi 1i111,1IpupiiY�" 1 Ilq,� a 4 JIB Piii� llll,l,l��ddd Proposed Action Review damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures as determined appropriate incorporating the use of an Asset Management System. i,A INFO MA Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTT N f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 170 1 If" ,n VIII >� ��usuy�NAaNN flifil 1,(nnn1L11IV�NuNA11uH1111 N�NNH4YhtlVld l'I Ipp�I�u �AGd Nd ka n���BINN N�"MNM"���� 1111111 I' 1111° �d P' III VIII _,uu a ud iglu u,d. Proposed Action Special Needs Public Education and Outreach i,A INFO MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGAII N ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 171 1 If" ,n uul. Gl �osu�ANN p�; � y110p1111pNV1'N�uh�1o11,1 ,V�N�N�yNIHIhCi,„,i.111 Proposed Action ! lig II 11111111,11111111111111111 Public Education programs to educate population on dangers and mitigation options. ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually NCCRP( RATION INT LAWS AND PFtOCEDURE<< ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 172 1Page uD>�N�suyNAaNNii�nnn��I;NuNA�uNNhN�VN�NNN�YNNVINIIiiiNNA�"ink 111 uli NNNN�Ii�NNNNNNNNNNN�I� vvvugvvvl�llll'lll! „„ Proposed Action � PPPIP^rvrern111111 111 f 11111111 i II 11 !iI I M Community Wildfire Risk Assessment i,A INFO MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 Year NCORP( RATIONI T AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 173 1Page ugpi D�� Aa1N ; nnn� 1� NuHA�VHgyrpCp101NNYp11nn1ii to Proposed Action i1 u1" 1111111111111111 Community Wildfire Protection Plan update ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 Year NCRP(RATIONI T AND PFOCEL (JF ES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 174 1Page 11001000,001000,0„j00000.110.01000000,00000000,00,0000 �0uA00u�y100Aa�N ; nnn,„l NuHA�uH,,„1111�NNY�Yovmo,„l,lu kw 00” I0°90.000 IVUI OIJ llll10001100001010000005 Proposed Action 0 iv 11111111 Oa10 11 11 1.0,000001 11:111001111 Conduct public education program on fire risks and wildland fire mitigation, with the assistance of the Texas Forest Service. i,A INFO MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 Year NCORP( RATION INT' 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 175 1 If" ,n g 000000 nnn4 �iHuHA1"0H1111111111111rwNHH��nn1iuli„.1l' 111 [II 111111111111111111 111 Jlplll11mool IIS ,i Fti ; iztil ti �, � IIIuII �,; tl Proposed Action ��An�RPArerfl,11111111 111111 111 i Creation of Master Drainage Plan for implementation i,A INFO MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 176 l Ii” ,n e �.��1y��Aa��innn�liuNA�N��r��i��NH�p�nn�ia'lpu��e2�"& looMwripoo �111,J r��l�I Proposed Action Obtain certification of communities by the Natonal Weather Service as "Storm Ready" communities. i,A INF 0IMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Terrorism, Hazardous Material Release, Pipeline Failure, Pandemic Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 1 Year NCORP( RATIONI T AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 177 1Page 1Iu�,1,1say��Aa��nnn��iHuNA�N�r1111�u�wNHH��nn�iulill�°I11!I!UN Proposed Action ��An�RPA�rerfl 1111 111111 111 1110;1101� V/d 1II, Assess use performance/impact zoning to set risk- based standards for land development. Establish "agricultural use districts" in zoning ordinance to limit densities in known hazard areas. Establish procedure to utilize overlay zones for requiring mitigation Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTT AIL, Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Drought, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years NCCRP( RATIONI T NS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 178 1Page yiuuoDopoolol yvvil ovvvvv llvvolo illiv ,IIIS aa�"V�nnlliuiVN ",'6'u'9�gN1'''Ji Proposed Action Work with county, state and federal agencies to maintain up-to-date hazard data, maps, etc. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Dam Failure, Flood, Hurricane, Severe Thunderstorm, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: NC Emergency Management/Mayor/Council Implementation Schedule: 2 Years NCRP(RATIONI T N'S AND PFOCEL (JF ES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 179 1Page IuuiD>1�'�uuy��Aa�N Y" hV Proposed Action 11111110 iiiiiil NN"'Hill'I'Dj0001 f1lllllllllluluqipii If Woo 1C11u1, 1111111111111 Retrofit fire facility to hazard -resistant levels El Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Emergency Service District 3 Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCORP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 180 1 If" ,n II'IIfi00iLII.111.1111,111111l'° Proposed Action 111111 Nettorl� IIIIIIII 1 111111111IIIIIrn,fl Install quick -connect emergency generator hook- ups for critical facility- school. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Mayor/Council/Bishop CISD Implementation Schedule: 4 Years NCORP( RATIONI T NS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 181 1 If" ,n City of Port Aransas Mitigation Actions a�r��u�wNHH� N k, iiii!auuq�IdN�"" M. �������������iuuu Proposed Action Engage property insurance carrier inspectors to conduct annual risk assessments of infrastructure and buildings. INFO MA Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTT AIL, Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATIONI T LANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 182 lPage a�� �'ilj'"n4411i HuNA�1N �r�{1[1N p11nnlii“i IIII I 01,1011 Proposed Action Install early warning siren(s) to quickly warn residents and visitors of impending peril from natural or manmade hazards. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATIbN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $55,000 Potential Funding Sources: EMPG, HMGP, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM Implementation Schedule: 1-2 years NCCRP( RATION INT' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 183 1 If” ,n uuD1N',1,1suyNaN�nnn�tlN�NuNA�uNNN�N�NNN�YNNVIN ) f Proposed Action Review damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTIN f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 184 lPage uuII11,1111i1iIIIIuy�IINNi'N1II11,111IV�NhNa1'���d1a'N;;111'����'"��11 110:1INYY�� 1.111 011 ,11111 Proposed Action ��i011 1111111111•11111111"1111111111111111111.01JT 1111111,11, � Ali i� N�N u �I 11 1 10'00 Public Education programs to educate population on dangers and mitigation options. A INF OI MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Hurricane, Tornado, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Coastal Erosion, Dam/Levee Failure, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Hailstorm, Land Subsidence, Severe Winter Storms, Windstorms, Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OC (ME ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 185 1 If" ,n Uy�� �Usu�NAJ�� IVI !HIII�nnd� �Uuul�Hu�VN �h��i��NHH�Y11111. l� IIIiR�ti LAG � �R rli �U� Y" �kMkM�re Proposed Action A Establish a reserve water supp y to support operations during no -water weather events. INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget/HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City Facilities, Police Dept Implementation Schedule: 2 Years NCCRP(RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 186 lPage uliu,11111�u�yuAa�� 11',11"nn��,I NuHA�uH p�1�V�1NNYQYhtlllu“ iu IialIIIgiI111100 fly 11 Proposed Action Review Emergency Plan re: heat related safety policies, establish best practice and update safety procedures as determined appropriate. INFO I MAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DE7AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: EMS Implementation Schedule: Annual NCCRP(RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 187 1 If" ,n IIII,IIIIpJJ�IJ��N�NN�JN� ��� !II 1u1.1i11 rmr� sc h IN Proposed Action mi„1„1„„11„11„1111111111111111111111111111111.11110„.„„,„,„,„,y,„ dis U!�I1111111 �.il LikI� SNI u Work with Water Development Board to Identify SRL property and encourage application for grant assistance fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Planning Department Implementation Schedule: Annual NCORP(RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 188 lPage y�u�I�say��Aa���nnn� �iHuNA� N�r��u�wNHH��nn�iu l l� „ulllu�;�n'' °°° viii I Illuuiiu �� I I�, iii , 11111611 �1�1I1 i � IJ4UJ IIIIIILlllll� l��lll NNNlldl uuulul t ui uul� IllIIII1Ili111111 Proposed Action Assess shoreline conditions along City Beaches. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Planning Department Implementation Schedule: 1 year NCCRP(RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 189 lPage D�1���suy�NAN�NH1II�NNV��INNVNuVN �h��iflNHH��hh�ldll II IIINp�i r1I',, II4III1111'd'd'dd� V�V it `i ioiii iiiiiil 'N 1i illlli llliT'i l ��I lilil lll lLl 1 IIIIIIII,IIIIII111111 „1 „�i r % cull 111�99IdUl drill hhl'I 1i���' li100 .111.11 Proposed Action A Dune Protection Plan /Erosion response plan update INFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA II. AC1 h AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget, Coastal Erosion Control Grant Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Planning Department Implementation Schedule: 1 year NCORP(RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 190 lPage uD>J i.. C� NusWuyNAaNN uJnxinnn�111I aNuNA ",. NN�NNNN.p. YNNVINIIippuuNa' NN II iuIll111„1Juuuiui Id 11„,11.11,111.11111,1 II di� �� IIIIIIIII IIS ii�l! of ouJ jfrirlf Proposed Action Review department severe weather property Protection related policies, establish best practice and update emergency action procedures as determined appropriate. A INFOFRMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN -AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorm, Severe Winter Storm, Tornado, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City Admin Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE� ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 191 1page 1uul1D11111.iiuiyi.ilwool � innn4�I NuHA�uHph1�I��NNY111YhhVldll Ill". low 0100,011101111 illirm1111011 111111111011N 01 Proposed Action Establish policy to help protect life and property. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Planning Department Implementation Schedule: NCCRP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE� ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 192 lPage ugpllD>�N���.NNuAa1N;nnn� 1INVNA�uNgy11pCp0NNY11YhNVd Qd YI Bi'jd'' ��wwwww IIII Proposed Action WW1 1111111 111111 Establish understanding w th NC Emergency Mgmt. for co -location of EOCs A INFORM Al Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA II. AC1 h AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM Implementation Schedule: Annual NCORP(RATION Td EXISTING PLAN'S AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 193 l If" a u 11.)1nnp��l HVNA1,111)uH�1?ph�11'1HN YhhVld"III !IPuioT11,1,11V u " 1* . 'p °1 lo Hopi 111:1111.11„ Proposed Action Review department severe weather shelter in place policies, establish best practice and update emergency action procedures as determined appropriate. fNFOIMAI Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DE7AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget, EMPG, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM Implementation Schedule: Annual NC RP RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 194 lPage 1111111innp� INuNA�uNNhN�V� NNV111YNNVIV I!!u ui�.1n A �! Proposed Action Install hurricane shutters or other appropriate high impact window protection to prevent breakage facilities where appropriate. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorm Moderate Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City Facilities Department Implementation Schedule: 2-3 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 195 lPage 1111nnn111�NNuN"IIIII1Ngyrpr111V1111NNYp1nn1iillo "u III:'I°'1 ;I �p Proposed Action oltlIluulliiu�luu11uu11uu11uuliiiIiii I1 1i1u1uuuuuuiui uiuuu,,„oo„ yovvo111 ug �1dI1ii1 �,1�II II1��I�11111111711111111,11,„10111111111 I�;I'�1 I'I�'ql�I1I1�I1�I1�I1�I1� 11 i1111111 11111111�� I�1 I�I � 11. t� iq� Vui1uu i �11 �� II����1 IhI �d 1��iwi City Wildfire Risk Assessment to include nature preserve and dune area. A INFOI MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA11:NAP. 1 -AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: PA VFD, OEM Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually NC:: :RP( RATIONI NTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE� ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 196 lPage ugplD��N����NNuAa'JN fNilnnn� IN'�NuNA�uNgy�NhN1Vi111NNY111YNNVIN Q 'ILI 11 Illludddd��tltl I<<dJ iii 1111 � Proposed Action City Wildfire Protection Plan update A INFO MA Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN -AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $0 Potential Funding Sources: Regular Department Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: PA VFD, OEM Implementation Schedule: Update Process/Review Annually NCORP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE� ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 197 lPage I ISD>'Ju;,'�say11,1Aa�� il �� nnn� ;INuNA11u,�r�{rilwNNH�YnnVlu 1111111 EI Ir Proposed Action A Emergency Generators for Emergency Operations & Logistics Support INF OIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $225,000 Potential Funding Sources: EMPG/HMPG Lead Agency/Department Responsible: OEM, Police Implementation Schedule: 4 years NCORP(RATION Td EXISTING PLAN'S AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 198 lPage a�N � i nnn4 �I NVNA�VN 11�N Q�htl11d ll00p1I1u ao Proposed Action The purpose of the Plan is to reduce potential losses from future disasters by physically enhancing and raising the intracoastal bulkhead height. Inland property and life is vulnerable given rising sea level and potential surge from an intense storm. A INF OI MAl Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Flood, Hurricane Moderate Estimated Cost: $700,000 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Development Services, OEM Implementation Schedule: 2-3 years ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 199 lPage IUL y� �II�;h P�� '�, r1',',11,11,1111111 99'ih h(11��i� uuu11,11. 111 i(1111111111111'1111T111111111111'11'1.1;11111, 16 d 1,11 Proposed Action Design and implement a program to assess and restore shoreline conditions along City Beaches. A INFOI MAl Site and Location: Along city shorelines Risk Reduction Benefit: The natural systems of Port Aransas will benefit from continual assessment and restoration. Shoreline and marshland will help attenuate flooding. Maintained shorelines will reduce the impacts of coastal erosion. Natural hazard vulnerability is known to fluctuate. By tracking changes in population, assets, and capabilities, The City of Port Aransas will be better able to identify mitigation actions that are needed most and allow for changes to implementation, cost, and prioritization during the lifecycle of the plan. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITI ATI IU ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: New and existing buildings will benefit from the risk reduction of an assessment and restoration program. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $75,000 Potential Funding Sources: City Budget, HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Planning Department Implementation Schedule: 1 year NCCRP( RATION INT' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 200 lPage City of Robstown Mitigation Actions tyn�ivHuHAu��A��r��f�pfl��nn�iu�iI��,1��ro0�K�I1���M�ir+IIuul�.�Mvy� j:llfillllllU1uu� AF III II!' � II I�� iu �J'�i��� Idddld'I III Illld Ri�� 1I1 Proposed Action Emergency generator for WWTP and Lift Stations. AC 'INFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION fE7'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) NC Ni INT'' EXISTING PLANS ANID PFtOCEDIJFtES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 201 1Page uD�1J101suyuAaNN�a;i1001iHuHA�11H�r��u��NHHo�n�ia��il���u���u;�r p uuu 0„„1.„1,000W11111 000000 0 10000iIiiiiiiiillifill1010.010.000000 Proposed Action � ellp; P.,I ii ,0.0'.00,00:000"001110:10.11.1" iii i lu:y Study feasibility of second Electrical Substation. A LNFOI MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness M ITIGATI NACTI Nf 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: High Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: Robstown Utility Systems Short Term (1 Year) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 202 1 If" ,n g 0 N�r��u�wNHH��111?'hi;i'I Proposed Action a ur, i � III 'II ili Q� I 66 Study feasibility of second Natural Gas Gate. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness M ITIGATI NACTI Nf 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: High Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: Robstown Utility Systems Short Term (1 Year) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 203 lPage �uuuD,)M 1)sy�AaNN � ij )11V�I NuHA�u" ph�1V1111NNY�Yhh111“?;1, .111111111,1111111111111111111111 aaaall�N�NN� Proposed Action Coordinate with the Robstown ISD regarding shelter improvements. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTION f E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown, Emergency Management Coordinator, Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC N INT' 'EXISTING PLANS ANID PF OCEDURE. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 204 1 If” ,n V��v�NNN�dNNNhYhnnn�� w II III Illj iYi�f SIM,,, ""'��4411 YY a jj I�YttI Proposed Action Illllllllll1111uml Ilpp 1011111111111111 1111V Ih1I ulll id IV�I�wiii I�I 4 oouuilllllllllllllllp ll11010 D xvvuY, 10111011111111111110000011'II Utilize the City's Natural Hazard Warning System. A fNFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown, Emergency Management Coordinator Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) INC( RP( RATI N INTI° XI"S11NG PLANS ANDPRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 205 1page IIID,)M 1)syNAJNN �1 �j )11V�I NVNA�uH ph�1V1111NNYQYhtl111“ IIP000nl Proposed Action Study citywide drainage improvements. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTION f E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC N INT' 'EXISTING PLANS ANID PF OCEDURE. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 206 lPage rl � � 1 11111111111111111111111111111111111 Proposed Action Construct retention ponds ' 1 '11111111111 A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACEIN f E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator), Nueces County Drainage District No. 2 Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC N INT' 'EXISTING PLANS ANID PF OCEDURE. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 207 1 If" ,n 1.1?"1111111111111111111111i. „„ IP�I�II�UU1°l�NI6h'8�'111�ll'���� Proposed Action Coordinate with Nueces County Drainage District No. 2 to enhance flood protection in the Robstown area. LACI INFORP Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATIbN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator), Nueces County Drainage District No. 2 Implementation Schedule: Long Term (5+ Years) NC N INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PFOCEDURE . ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 208 lPage )1)11)1).),1 111 al'''11 ff��n °a'� hNww ww P� ���fl�'fhh�Vldlll 191 III P u il,u Iw�dgA}r'�,ii N9!5ffIJ Proposed Action I � i I III' iii Study the Costs and Benefits of Acquiring Flood Prone Properties and Return Land to Open Space CACI 114FOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1 N AC 1`ONi DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator), Nueces County Drainage District No. 2 Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION INT O EXIST ING PLANS AND "PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 209 lPage liplulpD>I�YY�eN�NuAaNN����'ii�N'��YAY"�hChN�IiYN�IN���I� 111111 110 ppplll ��I I PIN �I VIII 11 111.� II Ii 2!�I I :iniliii, tlj md.I .14I l I 111 I ' � 111111 „o�� IY 2 01101 °I II I'k Proposed Action Review and update Floodpla'n Management Ordinances annually. u1 u I! IACI INFOF M Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness 'ATION ACTION NAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) INC( RPORATI N INTI° EXI"STI.NG PLANS ANDPRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 210 1 If" ,n g m uuu�D>�11usuy��Aa�1,1;;1qn�INVNArH�phl111,puuuu1uil�111.1111.1,1111 � Proposed Action pill tri' 1 VIII 1� ,� p!w �i"Ili ,i' �r q� LJ 011 vll ii a'l, i11 +hili u,11 �1 'i'l �I''i'�,a'hRilu Elevate flood prone properties when acquisition is not feasible. CACI INNF( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness ATI ON ACTT( N ID TAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator) Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) INC( RP( RATI N INTI° EXI"STI.NG PLANS ANDPRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 211 1page 1111.11;1 °h:;:::(h;1I111NhNINiI 111111111111111111 11! IN 1m 111111111111111111111111,111,111,11111.1jili111„1„,?,11.1:11).„.1:1!111.11.1inill?1?1? Proposed Action h 11.1111111110ti It Continue participation in the NFIP and evaluate Community Rating System (CRS) opportunities. CACI WFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC N INT' EXISTING PLANS AND PFOCEDURE . ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 212 1 If" a !'8 • 11111111 111111,1 11.111 11.1111111,111(1,1,1111.1.11.11.1111111.iiirihtlifi, Proposed Action Continue implementation of City of Robstown Storm Water Management Plan. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION f E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC NINT+ LANE AND PF OCEDIMES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 213 lPage IIIUIII,U.g,1)iusuy�NAJIA'I%�ff I'Jh�h+nI�APAN�IN,I 0 W .. V0 �I I v� 0 0 IN 0, d'11,11" IIIIA�� 01(111011110110 11111111111111 Wt11 11 u10d I I� "1111111111111..111011111111111100111,111.11111111„1111„111 " (� i'l� � 111,11,1,111111,11,11,11,11 ,1111 i1� i�011111 "1111 .1 11111(111111'111"1111111'1111i 11111'11111111111111". 11 i, 11 Proposed Action Educate Robstown res.dents regarding the impacts of flood events, including potential losses to life and property. 1111111111,1,11111111111'1111]'1111111110 1,11,11,1,11,111, Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION ACTIN (TAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Floods Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: High Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administrator) Short Term (1 Year) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 214 lPage „1)„111,111„1„1,1,1,11,1,4,11'11'111 1P1,1VI�uNA�uNNPIIIIIIpN11,111 NNpYY4VIN � I ..110 Proposed Action ii,111,1111,111,11,11,11,11, 1(11!11111141(11 i 111111"111'11,1„1"1111111'11' 11111,,)�1i'r�v�l � 1111100011,1(1111,1111,101,11,011,11,1:1111,,,, i!I00011fup111'„1'..11,,11(11,11110,11,0,0, " 1111111 Protect critical facilities and equ.pment through the installation of lightning rods and grounding on communications infrastructure. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATION :AP IE- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Public Works) Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) NC N INT' 'EXISTING PLANS ANID PF OCEDURE. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 215 lPage y�„11u1ay0a�� ;i gni HuNA11N 11��n�iuw�� SII i MMM "I11��'pifinuiri Proposed Action AC, n lV1!IIII I0 19 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 .,milluivo,voulilo.1,1,1. Install and maintain surge protection on critical electronic equipment. INFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness CATION ACTI( N ID TAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: Moderate Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: State/Federal Grants, City Budget City of Robstown (Public Works) Robstown Utility Systems Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 216 1page VIII ��us �NAa i j qqV;l NuNA1"uN11�NNH1111YhhVld 1 IIII J' ° (,. �a NN1IV�"IN Nli� Y ulYIiINN'i p " iil� iiii,i iii "" 9i9 i I'I I) uun u i ui1Vuii i� �u �i u u uugii u ! dud �i Proposed Action AC, Conduct Lightning Awareness programs. INFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness CATION ACTI( N ID TAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: Moderate Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: City Budget City of Robstown Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 217 1page uuulpuuluuua��A�w",'�ry9nfl�i,1�di'a'k'N��[�������8"�'1d°tlPP�d� yup, �� SII uil�u.,l0,11:10 000000 I,. i!000ll000000 01 111111111 voo Proposed Action 010 Encourage insurance authorities to provide discounts for residents who install lightning protection systems. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: Low Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: City of Robstown Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) NCORPORATION INTI 'EXISTING PLANS AND "PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 218 1 If" ,n uui11D111111[Illy1uAa1N i ' Nb�HN �����nlnll�111 Proposed Action AC, IIIUH!i!! io1u II 1i1 i; Educate Robstown Residents About Extreme Heat Safety and Health Issues 'IN:FaFt Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness CATION ACTI( �u ETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: High Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: City Budget City of Robstown, Robstown Utility Systems Short Term (1 Year) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 219 lPage Iqu4l,D�,Jl�41uN�M �W�'h�fiplli�UlV�n,0II4uN4'llll IV, lnm 1u� o0llry44d�+n1�NIVNNNIVNHdhltldtlnL.l II 1111111 n 1[1uuu 11,r11,111111000 11 N ��l a 1141111444 q p Proposed Action Work with Local Social Service and Healthcare agencies to educate Robstown's elderly residents regarding Extreme Heat. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown, Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT 'EXISTING PLANS AND "PF OCEDURE. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 220 lPage 10;u�4.0�Aa11I nnn +hnn'11gnpil"1NlN��iu1100111111 h ui ami uiIll.l11111.11.1110111111111 1111i 0 1,11111.11 11 lie 11 111111111111.11 V' "�Y 110010010.1101.01 011 ..11 111111101,1110110111011100110101 Proposed Action Reduce Heat Island Effect through increased tree planting in parking lots and along public rights-of-way, green roofs, and use of cool roofing products that reflect sunlight and heat. TACK R UND INFOR, Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness A11ON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown, Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2 — 4 Years) INC( RP( RAI ISN INTI° EXISTING PLANS ANDPROCE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 221 1 If" ,n 111111 I,11,1.I1!Ai,,,?h'"WVI:1\ 11!v oll1J1111 111 111 11 II ,1,1,11ill11111 11111'1111.11111111111'11111 1101111 oloo 11111 Proposed Action ii�fi pilu�� ?5)1��l,111111' 11111111111 fki Proposed Action Encourage utilities to defer high electric bills during extreme high temperatures. CACI `IN:F( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness A1iON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown, Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) 100 EXISTING PLANS AN17 PRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 223 1 If" ,n �,I�IJb��IIM1111�Nll[N��Nhd�1(N1,1,1,�IflNNIV11KNN11,1'11,1,.'111111111111)111)1111111111111111iiiliiiil Proposed Action '11[1 1111111110.11111111 11J I(�Id udu Idfdl d a Coordinate with Nueces County WCID #3, City of Robstown Fire Department regarding Drought Contingency Plan compliance. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTIN f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Fire Department), Robstown Utility Systems, Nueces County Water Control & Irrigation District, No. 3 Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) INC( RP( RATIt N INTI° TIN ADDITIONAL PLANS ANDPRI CE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 224 lPage UoD>1 Aus000000Aaoogoop00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ir,t poo '1„,,,0„,„„).„1„.„ i „� la„1'1,,l„„nnl��1�9 0 �� i Lala R'' nl„„,i„ 11 VIII � ill i 1(1„1111, ii �iiilii I�! 111 2.2„,„,111uu �I�� �I� III Proposed Action ,11,1111'11111111„ Review and Participate in Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan CACI `INNF( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness M!ITIGA1N ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Fire Department) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT LANE AND PF OCEDIMES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 225 103 ,ng 00000 IIIIIIIII�y�JI�iUsu��NAJ���(�' �' YN p Ulll111iipuu Proposed Action ,jJiIII 01 lb' 1G!�i illGi ir „' „II�u19u19irl IlIi1�Gfl ,I� iL Jl��Ii, Educate Robstown ResidentsAbout Benefits of Water Conservation CACI 'IN:FOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness A1iON ACTION IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Robstown Utility Systems, Nueces County Water Control & Irrigation District, No. 3 Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT(' EXIST LNG PLANS AND "PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 226 1Page 11 ',1(jrjrivojil'1111,11,11,11)111111111111111111111111111111111111,11111)V11111111111111.11p,?) 1114,1 11,3 Proposed Action Review Nueces County Wildfre Risk Assessment CACI INNF( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness CATION ACTI( �u ETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Fire Department) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT LAN AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 227 1Page q.l.ii u�I)f1say��Aa�� � i gn�luNNNuNA11N111�V��NNH�Yhh�ld �q„ulllu � a Proposed Action uuul I I �I� 1111111 1111 IIIV1f VI1�I, „ uil !iiGGI .111 II �fG uuu I� � .'f I ! ��� fel Ill�l I III Study feasibility of Water Conservation Rebate or Incentive Program AC, `IN:F( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness CATION ACTT( N ID TAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Robstown Utility Systems, Nueces County Water Control & Irrigation District, No. 3 Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION INTI EXIS7 TNG PLANS AND "PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 228 1page 11ipD,N��), AaN If11"ai( VINY �NN'Na�"''NNS°�NVNIN'VNYNNNNI Ii�PPP�!N��� 111 dN " Proposed Action Promote through Pubic Education/ Awareness the use of proven engineering solutions to residential and commercial buildings on expansive clays. A LNFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1 N ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION INT+ LANE OOP Pc ORO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 229 1 If" ,n uIr,lIUIJ111us;�v,J;N�''nnnB��u �{'ddd1.., 6 HIT ufq;1 pl �'�1111111�1111dhi1�r � i! 11111Nr1l 0yhnu F.. nu 14 u144(I ufull 'YIh�l'ITI111111111111111.111111111 vi lryrylIlI�� �� I I ,:,'111'1)1711„1,1 ui ,III Proposed Action Review Existing Soil Survey and update Expansive Soils Map for Robstown area annually. CACI 'iNFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA7'IN ACTIbN DE- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION 7+ LANE AND PF OCEDIMES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 230 1Page u 11111111111....J..d�-10;•J� , "1;� N �'I'nnnB�V �1111,�rl pI,i ortl'�1i �1111111�1111f11� i! 1111IN1.0yhnu 1 F.. nu� ! p �, f�14 II144f� ful�i�Iqq 11111111 111111111111111110 1 WI 11111 111 1111(1 „9 �� m Proposed Action Integrate Flood and Drainage Mitigation measures in areas where Expansive Soils are most prevalent. LACK R UND INFOR, Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA11 N ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administration) Nueces County Drainage District #2 Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION INT+ LANE OOP Q.c ORO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 231 1 If" ,n DOI yIia.NJVj�I(Y11i��dN'aa� �ll�.ia�ii���Huau m Vp 11'111'1 a � aw i . ii �(01 ii u ;° ,ull .�III Proposed Action 1111.1111 1,111111k 11,11.;11111.1111111111 .11 InI 1'1(1 111111111'11(1'.111.11100,11111j11111,11,111j1L,u, 10'011' 11110'1101 Discourage or prevent development in the most severe areas where expansive soils are most prevalent. LACK F UND IN:F( R, Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATII N ACTIN f E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Floodplain Administration) Nueces County Drainage District #2 Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION LAWS AMID PROCEDURE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 232 1Page IIIIIIIIII0101011111111110ii0iii00100111'111011110 111111,1„,11,11,1111,1,1111,111(1,11,11,111111,1111,11,11 I 11 1111111111 on Proposed Action 11111111 V 1111111J111,1,11, Provide shelter ng for supplies and equipment at critical facilities such as the WWTP and Electrical Substation. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hailstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown, Robstown Utility Systems Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC N INTI 'EXISTING PLANS ANID PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 233 1 If" ,n uuuNllU111usiy1Ilv,Nni��Vl'nn'iN'NN �I''P�I�i��d�fhhdld,l 11111111111111111 /1110 Id a o uuuV�yHI I Itti 1111 III Proposed Action 000000000 Promote the use of hail resistant roofing materials, structural bracing, shutters, laminated glass in window panes, and roof sheathing to better resist hail damage. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hailstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION LAWS OOP Pc ORO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 234 1 If" ,n I1,IIdll' ' 'dill pV 1111 VV u 9�luiui� uu4il'I X611616 j. Proposed Action Educate Robstown residents regarding hail dangers and where to seek shelter during hailstorms. AC, INNF( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATI N ACTIN f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hailstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: High Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City Budget City of Robstown (Emergency Management Coordinator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 235 1 If" a �IIII,UdU�I 14.!;1111,1,111111)N11,1111,111,111111101.1(1'1111����N�N�NHHu�OY�d�I��, i1 w Proposed Action 11111111 so,,00001H 11111111111111111111111111 1111 11 VVVVVVIVVVVIVVVVVIllll I III 0(111 Develop and enforce building codes and mobile home installation codes that will minimize damage from high winds. CACI 10FOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTION f E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION LAN3 AMID PF Pc ORO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 236 lPage lull plI14�N��iNNNila�,�N I 11 111111 „I 11111111 , 11101111111"11111110111111.1111.1011 Proposed Action 11111 Hi II HH. ff I I Promote building design standards to minimize wind damage such as wind buffers, passive ventilation in building and site design, and wind resistance roof shapes. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT+ LANE ANID PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 237 lPage IIIIDIU!u�N9V�AWNN'11':1o;1',(1NN'I111111 IHh°'p"nfl IM W n '15,, pi: I � I u�uM 'n 11111111111111 J. 11,1 54.1 11111 1111111 Proposed Action 01111111111,11,111,11,11.111, 9h),i 1 fu u41u 11111,11 �� Develop and implement standards for burial of electrical, telephone, cable lines and other utilities. CACI WFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA11 NAP I( E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT+ LANE AND PF OCEDIMES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 238 lPage IU> S�eN�N�aNN�' � ry U UNN I, YHI 01 VNNNQYNNN11U' .,.H.,111,111,J11,;1111!licilli,111 Hoo VIS Proposed Action UUNJ u .� „11)INS iu;III�'� i(��iiuudllldli�, � 61 q�661 Strengthen emergency operation centers windows with hurricane shutters and roofs with enforced materials. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness M ITIGATI 'NAP E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: State/Federal Grants, City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) NC RPORATION T+ LAWS AMID PROCEDURE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 239 1 If" ,n W u1P nwmoP�n��'�uwula�r".iNau LII VIII ,;1 " .II it 1.111 11110 "°° '11111.101111L up111111 Proposed Action Promote the retrofit of residential buildings to reduce future wind damage through protective measures. LACK F UND IN:F( R, Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1bN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION LAWS ANID PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 240 1 If" ,n IUJI�uINpVIaN'Aiifl 11[1[VNw ww�11 11 11 ��fldABAA��nnl 0° a 0 a: 1111, ugggqq i Proposed Action II �II I'Ill 1111101111111[,„ °[111111111 10 SII111111111111 11 yoloo '11,11;111q11 1111,11111.11i 11111 u Access public buildings and critical facilities through the improvement of roof coverings, anchoring HVAC units, installation of load -path connectors to strengthen structural frames, and retrofitting emergency operations center to FEMA 361 standards. A INFORMAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATIbN ACTIIUE7AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION LAWS OOP Pc ORO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 241 1 If" ,n IIIIIU>�suy�NAJNN��ry�i�nnp��pagdNa�NMd Proposed Action 11111 d moo poi 11111111111111 1111111111 11111111111111111111 Educate residents regarding the effects of severe wind on property and life and provide protective measures. CACI WFOR Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGA1N ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC NINT+ L 3 AND PF OCEDIMES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 242 1 If" ,n us�;WJyli ^II o iN ii ld u I 9VI(hll'I dl 444�ii� �, Illll 1111'in iiiillI11111.1,11111111 1I '111;11;;111;11.1,111, ki . Proposed Action Promote the construction and use of safe rooms in homes and commercial areas. CACI `IN:F( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Tornado High City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Emergency Management Coordinator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 243 1 If" ,n uiuDl!J��'us4N�edu�l'I7'Ip N' Nllla'IINIjI'"nlli i0000lloolloollo00001..1uw 11111111111111111111111111 1111111111 11111 11111111111 Iv 1111111111 Proposed Action Review ordinances and building codes to encourage Wind -Resistant building technologies. 111111111111111111 livvi H11111;111 CACI INF( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection ATI ON ACTI( N ID TAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Development Services) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION IN1- EXIS7 TNG PLANS AND "PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 244 1Page u� w i�%V'I�Id�oII�IIIl IA O�nn�Il I�UIUI��HaL,H.N. ��IOB�N�IIIIIIh�• IUI �L Iw�U� V�u�N���'1 III III IIVI� �iI 11)'1111'11111' / )iflItft �I9� dIVdc1l10� �iuuglooI((II.1 l�i N I llllli Proposed Action 111,111,11,:ij.)1,1111•11,111y 111}1151„,! Educate Robstown residents regarding the risk of tornados, location of shelters, and warning systems. CACI INNF( Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection CATION ACTI( N IDETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Emergency Management Coordinator) Implementation Schedule: Short Term (1 Year) NC RPORATION INT LANE AMID PROCEDURE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 245 lPage auuuiNup�,NNVNNNNNN���NNNnnf;�;I,IuIIIIINIIIu�UuII�II�,Nuiu��RIIUGIN'���„d��wN�I�xi��iV�� 111110 mmo ,1,11111,1,10,011,11111111,)1111 '111 '11111.1111111.11,1111,11,11,11111,1111 1 Proposed Action A INFO MAT Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection ATION ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Windstorms Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: City Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: City of Robstown (Emergency Management Coordinator) Implementation Schedule: Moderate Term (2-4 Years) 100 EXI"STIN G PLAID AND PRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 246 1Page Port of Corpus Christi Authority Mitigation Actions ugpi �� ��001���NuAa�N I nns[0,0,l10l NuNA�NNgyr1011010NNYpYnh0ld°111410,000.1000„0„0,„[[[..000,„1„1„,..„ Proposed Action 'V IIIIIIIIIIII III il�llllll yl M' F HIrt 1101111 1111110[114 opoor01010101 1110001 1111,11,11,111,11111,1,1111,111,1 0000 00000000, Corpus Christi Ship Channel Improvement Project- Widen and deepen ship channel to increase safety and reduce potential for complete closure or draft restrictions due to storm generated shoaling and debris. AC. INFORI Site and Location: Ship Channel at Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The PCCA has been seeking needed channel improvements since soon after final achievement of the 45' Project, a 1968 Congressional Authorized project, not completed until 1989. The initial study for this generation of proposed improvements was in response to a congressional resolution adopted in 1990, by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives, where it stated: "....to determine the feasibility of modifying the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, with particular emphasis on the La Quinta Channel... in the interest of commercial navigation and related purposes." Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes Effect on new/existing buildings: Closure of the ship channel is estimated at over $100,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $300,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: 75/25 Federal/Local cost match. PCCA has already identified the required local match Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 247 lPage Implementation Schedule: 2020 INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 248 lPage OillilJ ui,1„1uy�NAaNNIIIIII,VIIIIIi,I1N,11111,NVNA1„111uNNhN�VNNNN�YNNVIN"IIIl�lpilll'I41�"N� ili un iililomo� 11uuulllll I��,I�II�II�I�I�I ql�l� IIIIIIJJ1IIflL2 IIII 1 I III 11,1„I Proposed Action Joint Security Command & Control Center - Establish a command and control center to co - locate Security and Harbor Master operations. Additionally, the facility will serve as the multi - agency coordination center for all -hazards maritime transportation incidents. EACKGR UND"INFORM Site and Location: Ship Channel at Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: A dedicated facility with adequate and appropriate technological support does not currently exist to co -locate all critical federal, state and local maritime transportation responders. The Harbor Master's Office and Security Command Center are vulnerable to Category 4 & 5 winds, are in the 500 year flood plain and are also vulnerable to storm surge inundation. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Aid in reconstitution of maritime operations in a timely and efficient manner. Closure of the port is estimated at over $160,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $15,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program, State Homeland Security Grant and General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 INCO RPO RATIN INTI° EXISTING PLANS ANLL PRICE Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 249 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 250 1Page 111 Proposed Action Design and implement an Asset Management Program for use in documenting current condition and lifecycle maintenance and replacement for all infrastructure. ACI INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: The PCCA does not currently operate a comprehensive asset management program. The utilization of such a tool would aid in damage assessments and ensure recovery of appropriate reimbursable damages from the responsible party or other state/federal disaster aid programs as appropriate. Natural hazard vulnerability is known to fluctuate. By tracking changes in population, assets, and capabilities, PCCA will be better able to identify mitigation actions that are needed most and allow for changes to implementation, cost, and prioritization during the lifecycle of the plan. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure M111, Ali N AC AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Rapid recovery of eligible reimbursable funds ensures general revenues are continued to be invested in economic functions. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $500,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 251 lPage Implementation Schedule: 2018 INCORP( RATION INTd EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 252 1 If" a uui,ilU>11N�s�u�I��NN�'N�I I�"� V��INN��NA�N�iq�NIVfl�N'NbNN4�ln�l�� Illi. jlllr Ilh WIIw'Wlw.lf '111 h ollimy IIII I Il�'�1���� 111111uuuu Proposed Action 1 .1111111111111.1u' V�IUI VNN q cif iii ioiii;.(11°i' Dock/Wharf Fire Suppression System Review - Assess existing dock and wharf fire suppression systems to identify mitigation actions to reduce risk to vessels and waterside facilities vulnerable to fire as a result of lightning strike. ACKGFI ( UND IN:F( RI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: The various public docks that the PCCA maintain were constructed utilizing the current fire code standards requirement at the time of construction. Many of the docks need their systems updated to meet current best practice and industry standards for fire suppression. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Provide rapid fire response to shipboard fires. Prolonged fire response or inefficient vessel salvage will result in ship channel closure. Closure of the ship channel is estimated at over $100,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2017 INCORPO EXI TIN( PLAN' Nl E Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 253 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 254 1Page Proposed Action SUV,uu1111, uiK �I; Igl�p i ILP m, m � 9 m Business Continuity Plan- Review the previous Business Continuity planning efforts, establish best practice and update as determined appropriate. Planning effort to include identifying alternate sites for Security Command and Harbor Master's Office critical uninterrupted functions. A INFORMAl Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Efforts to establish a written business continuity plan have been ongoing for several years. An alternate site has been leased to ensure continued operations but is not fully equipped with desirable back-up systems to ensure uninterrupted operations. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATI N ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Aid in reconstitution of maritime operations in a timely and efficient manner. Closure of the port is estimated at over $160,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 255 lPage INCORPORATION INTO EXI"STIN G PLANS ANLL PROCEDU E Business Continuity Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 256 lPage �uu�DA����Ne�a'111h1�n Ill1111 u�01i�d'I110d1110Ri�„d'p 11 11 1� 10 1 d >r. 11 111111111111 Vfi,11,1„1.„!,1,,1,,1,11,10.1.0.0.10.111111111..111111fillii11100!1111111011.1111111111101,0111.11110,1011:111114.0001110110,1100101.01.00000000;004.u.100000.000000r 1.!F 010011.11110111 " 11V m 111 Iti, ' 111(0111(1(1 �i,00.11,1010001101.0 0. l�11111011111110,111111 �61.11.1,1"011,111.11111'111,111111111111111111.111.1;1•1111.11.ila 11Ilp �� I0II Ipl 1 11111111111 1101)11)1111..11)01) Proposed Action Improvements to the Salt Flat Levee System. Site and Location: Salt Flat Levee System in Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: The Salt Flat Levee System is an integral component of the downtown flood protection system. The levee requires improvements and maintenance to ensure that the system will function as originally designed. The levee is susceptible to various modes of failure. Additional study is underway and improvements are planned that would be sufficient to be certified by FEMA as a freeboard deficient reach. This means that although the system would not afford the level of protection required to prevent overtopping in a 100 -year event, it would not be vulnerable to a catastrophic failure. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Floods, Dam/Levee Failure. Effect on new/existing buildings: The effect of making improvements on the Salt Flat Levee system will help eliminate flooding of existing buildings that occurs in the downtown area of Corpus Christi. Failure to achieve FEMA certification would greatly impact the City of Corpus Christi and downtown business insurance costs considerably. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Cost share with City of Corpus Christi, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Corpus Christi Engineering and Development Services Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 257 lPage Implementation Schedule: 2-3 Years INC RP( RATION INTd EXISTING PLAN'S AND PROCEDURES Capital Improvement Plan for Corpus Christi ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 258 1 If" a }ula.". (p���1N�Nu�N�.�1u� 111)111111II II u 416 dry v, II a w11111 111111111 111 Mill Proposed Action "11 "Ilf44jIl'Ill1I(TI1111,1 irm •11looloo 111)1h Annual Risk Assessment- Engage property insurance carrier inspectors to conduct annual risk assessments of infrastructure and buildings. INF ORM Al Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Annual risk assessments do not currently include insurance carrier inspectors. Natural hazard vulnerability is known to fluctuate. By tracking changes in population, assets, and capabilities, PCCA will be better able to identify mitigation actions that are needed most and allow for changes to implementation, cost, and prioritization during the lifecycle of the plan. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Coastal Erosion, Hail Storm, Tornado, Expansive Sols, Dam Failure, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Rapid recovery of eligible reimbursable funds ensures general revenues are continued to be invested in economic functions. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Lost cost/staff time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDIMES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 259 1 If" ,n NNNNI+""p'n�IIpIIllilvo uii� II �wid� II V ��II9V ppp Proposed Action lq �p�iWPU N uu� yyul vY 1111 111111 tl �i "Ii NII Feasibility Study for Saltwater Desalinization - Evaluate the feasibility of constructing and operating a saltwater desalinization facility to provide uninterrupted water supply. AC INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Seawater desalination is a recommended water management strategy in the current State of Texas Water Plan as well as the Region N Water Plan covering our region. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N AC1 ION DETAIL. Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Water is a critical component of all industry partners. Lack of water would result in complete shutdown of operations. Closure of the port is estimated at over $160,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC LIRE State of Texas Water Plan; Region N Water Plan covering our region. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 260 1 If" ,n 1 of'�' ��9NIIIIiuIjIII����fldd�Ih4Vlnnl . I�� �u„ p„IWW 1,I""�1 Ali �In�r Proposed Action �� i�i u° OOq Iil. f l� ry ill I��IIV IY 11 SII l �I 199 VIII Lightning Alert System- Install lightning detectors and warning devices for critical facilities. AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: A system for lightning does not currently exist. NOAA cannot provide this data as it is provided privately by the National Lightning Detection Network Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI ATI N ACt ICN DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Protecting the critical facilities owned by the PCCA from lightning is an important step in maintaining the operations of the port with little interruption from lightning hazard. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: HMGP Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NC RP RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 261 1Page Proposed Action Employee Refuge Plan- Review department severe weather refuge policies, establish best practices and update emergency action procedures as determined appropriate. Establish agreements for suitable employee refuge sites appropriately windstorm rated for use by essential personnel required to remain on duty for hurricane response. EACKGR UND INFORM Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: It is important to the Port of Corpus Christi that the lives of port employees are not put into jeopardy when they are required to remain on duty for hurricane response. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Education and Awareness Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Employee Safety Manual ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 262 lPage Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 263 1Page iulyNl 111R1d,100111111111111flNi11ivagil11111 Proposed Action Potable Water Supply Feasibility Study - Evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a potable water supply to prevent water disruptions. ACKGR( UNCI INFORI Site and Location: Ship Channel at Corpus Christi Risk Reduction Benefit: In 2016, the City of Corpus Christi issued a "do not use" order for all municipal water users. Personnel traveled as far as San Antonio to obtain adequate water supply to ensure uninterrupted operations. A local potable source could maintain operations for a period of time until water distribution can be established locally. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGA1bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Water is a critical component of all industry partners. Lack of water would result in complete shutdown of operations. Closure of the port is estimated at over $160,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program, State Homeland Security Grant and General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC( RP(RATION INT LAN AND PROCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 264 1 If" ,n go ddi w r. Proposed Action 1711111111111.1111141111111111( 11.11111.111111 1111111 1„11 fliul '''''111111111111111•1111,1111111h11,10 ++ + Ili �iui^IiiiJJ'�III� Ilhl 19I �ii 19 �ileu'idil 99rfi�P�l I f l � Mooring Structure Analysis & Severe Weather Berthing Policy Update- Assess existing mooring structures to identify mitigation actions to reduce damages from surge and sway conditions. Results to be considered in the severe weather berthing policy review and update as determined appropriate. IA INFO MA Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Having an active plan ensures less damage to vessels while docked at the port during severe weather events. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Windstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCORP( RATIONI T PLANS ANDPFtOCEDURE < Severe Weather Berthing Policy ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 265 lPage „HvnviNdhP11Y110P11100UI0,„,r11111111111^h"0�i01fl00IIIIIIIVII „ 1 00,'Nd1001h 0i10U ggqVV1111011„1„11111111,11,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,11,11111111 11111,11111111,11 1111,1 Proposed Action Underground Utilities- Work with power utility provider (AEP) to establish underground utilities as appropriate to prevent power and communications disruptions. A IINFOI MAl Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Many of the PCCA owned/operated facilities currently have underground utilities however the distribution system is not. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATI N ACTI IU f 1AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Electricity is a critical component of all industry partners. Lack of electricity would result in a complete shutdown of operations. Closure of the port is estimated at over $160,000,000 in loss of economic activity per day. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 266 1 If” ,n Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 267 1Page 11nnV1111INVNA1"uHph��VN�NNH�YhhVldI!Ipuuutii" M'�� IhCllym�m�C����ll �'a��R �� i11u °111 Proposed Action Post Disaster Contracts- Establish post disaster contracts to include debris removal, records preservation, flood remediation and other services as determined appropriate. ACKGR( UNCI INFOR Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Various departments have established contracts that may be appropriate for disaster use. Additional contracts are likely needed to fill identified gaps. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure M ITIGATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Windstorm, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): High Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCCRP( RATIONI T PLANS AND OC OCEDURES Business Continuity Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 268 1 If" ,n ugpl D�� a�N 'i nnn11 �ly�NuHA�uH prlpN pYhhVl11 �� 111111111100100DROIIVIIIIvIvoovvI11111luv,,,,10' P �� ��111, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOYii1,7 . uu Proposed Action Storm Water Master Plan- Evaluate and map existing system including calculations for drainage areas, determine adequacy of capacity, establishing design guidelines, operations and maintenance plans and identify storm water improvement projects. ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Mapping existing PCCA stormwater system, calculating drainage areas, determining adequate capacity, design guidelines, operations and maintenance plans, etc. This project will also identify a number of storm water infrastructure improvement projects that are needed. However, several improvement project have already been identified and are listed under this grouping. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACT ESN DE- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Dam Failure Effect on new/existing buildings: Prioritization of major drainage improvements considering level of service and return on investment could greatly impact the operating budget and will help eliminate the flooding that impacts all of Corpus Christi. Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NCCRP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PROCEDURES Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 269 lPage Stormwater Master Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 270 1Page uD>1NusuyNAaNNu�nnn��INuNA NNhN�VN�NNNpYNNVINIIIIIpuuu�' qI NN4' i"�N 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Proposed Action Damage Assessment Plan- Rev.ew damage assessment policies, establish best practice and update procedures as determined appropriate incorporating the use of an Asset Management System. ACKGF C UNa"INFORJ Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Various departments and agencies have responsibility for post disaster damage assessment. Review will ensure all requirements are met and reduce duplication of effort. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITIGATIbN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCORP( RATIONI T LANS AND PROCEDURES Business Continuity Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 271 1 If" ,n ipu ��i �u��NuAaYN in n� �I NuHA ��1111111111ilvvmo��5 rV��naR�rerertn�, 1111J11U11J J�� m ��y' IVVVvvvyvvoolllyvvvo Proposed Action Lightning Vulnerability Assessment- Assess lightning vulnerability for key infrastructure including communications, fuel storage tanks and technology/communications systems. A INF OF' MAl Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION f E7'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NC RP RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE Business Continuity Plan ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 272 1Page uuu1D��iiiiNiNiAa�N;nnn��INuHA�uH11r1r11u��NN1pYnnVlul��uu 1111111111 Proposed Action Severe Weather Property Protection Policy Review and Update- Review department severe weather property protection related policies, establish best practice and update emergency action procedures as determined appropriate. ACKGR UIU:15.INFO I MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Appropriate property protections are identified in the Hurricane Plan but is not inclusive for other no -notice incidents. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI ATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low Cost/Staff Time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NC RP( RATION INT LAN AND PF OC URE Business Continuity Plan; Severe Weather Property Protection Policy ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 273 1 If" ,n liiD111,1��1,11y�uAaI�ijnnn4 �1NVNA�01ph11{11NNNH111Yhh�ldl! ipuuu i,..joill111111111111.111111.,.,11111111111,111,111,111ililliiirivii,1."1111:."11,11.11,11.1,01),„,),„1..„.i..„.1.0.it.ordoli Proposed Action Access Control Back Up Power- Install quick connections to each of the guard house complexes to ensure rapid deployment of portable generators. Critical power needs include traffic arms, computers, card readers, lights and others as determined necessary per site. A INFOIMAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Most of the guard houses are currently connected to emergency power. This project will address the ones that are not and also ensure that all critical systems are available. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI+ ATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricanes, Flood, Drought, Windstorm, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail Storm, Tornado, Dam Failure, Wildfire, Severe Winter Storms. Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCCRP( RATIONI T AND PROCEDURES Business Continuity Plan; ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 274 1Page 111111 111EJNIJ,1fl1111NNYYhY11d i1111;111111111 111111111111)111111 r 110 1111111 Proposed Action Dam Failure Impact Study- Evaluate impacts of dam failure on port operations for both Lake Corpus Christi and Choke Canyon Reservoir scenarios. ACKGROUND INFOR Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Choke Canyon Dam is a high hazard potential dam. If a failure were to occur, the resulting damage and downstream impacts at Lake Corpus Christi Dam cause catastrophic dam failure. Additional downstream impacts have not been evaluated for port operations. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): MITIGATI N ACTION DETAIL; Dam Failure. Moderate Estimated Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 Business Continuity Plan; ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 275 1 If" ,n 11,i�wNH���nn�iul�,a��y n liliii �II ), t' Proposed Action Breakwater Revetment- Add breakwater revetment to open water beneficial use sites to reduce erosion from wave action. ACI INFORM Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Construction of ecosystem restoration features protect endangered species, wetlands, and sea grass. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITIGATIbN ACTIN E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Operations Budget Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC RP RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 276 lPage IuuID>1�'�uuy��AaNNH•Y 11110111111111111 11 III�NNNV�� DIUIJNIi�' Proposed Action Establish retent on pond at Bulk Term.nal to prevent stored materials from entering into the storm water system and operational disruption from standing water. A INFORMAl Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Construction of ecosystem restoration features protect endangered species, wetlands, and sea grass. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NCORP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 277 1 If" ,n 0.D.VyU,Iu��say��Aa�� � �� nnn�i HuNA11' lu1wNHH��nn�iulnun. Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Purchase portable generator capable of providing adequate power to a guard shack including traffic arms, computers, card readers, lights and others as determined necessary per site during prolonged power outages. ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Most of the guard houses are currently connected to emergency power. This project will address the ones that do not and also ensure that all critical systems are available. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorms, Severe Winter Storms, Tornado Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NCORP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE� ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 278 1page iHuNa�AM�r��u�wNHH��n�iulV,„)„111,r�I :. 111.1.11 Proposed Action 11,1111,1111111,1„I)))1,1 „ Add additional bio -retention areas and/or drainage swales along Joe Fulton Corridor, Sigmor Road and at the North Side Storage Area, Bulk Terminal and Al Speight Rail Yard ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Construction of ecosystem restoration features protect endangered species, wetlands, and sea grass. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC RP RATION T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 279 lPage nnn��lyHVNa�nN,r,„„NHH�Yna1111, pPy1'MSI'II� su�pAiV 1� �(��r��� p 101 ��111:111nuuu iiiiiiii Proposed Action IVIV, tr11111111 I� I� 1Il1111111II11;;»,,,»»VVVVII A ! as Ila!11 j11Id1,!ii i1A)l!le1d'1),, Develop Debris Management Plan ,ACKGR UIU:15INFO I' MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Various agencies have responsibility for post disaster damage assessment. Review will ensure all requirements are met and reduce duplication of effort. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations ATI ON ACTI .N IDETAIL i Hazard(s) Addressed: Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorm, Severe Winter Storm, Tornado, Flood, Dam/Levee Failure, Wildfire Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low cost/staff time Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NC RP RATION INTI' EXIS7 LNG PLANS AND PROCEDURE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 280 lPage 111111111111111 1111111 11 1111111111111111111111111111 Proposed Action Site and Location: 1LUb it l,l i ii IiIIl,�ii ,� d66l6ll 6V1V1 lull lillllluul IIIiIiIIIiIII,IIhIddlll uuuuuulluuul� Establish an annual physical .nspection process for two-way radio repeaters, radar equipment, base stations and AIS. ,ACKGR UIU:15I'NF RMA1 The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Physical inspection can identify weathering and other critical issues that could impact storm survivability or equipment function. This proactive process can assist to identify problems early and allow for replacement prior to failure reducing operational downtown. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure ATI ON ACTI N IDET'AILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Low cost/staff time Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2019 NC RP RATIONI T 'EXIST LNG PLAN'S AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 281 1page uliiD�� ��u�y��AaNN "nn4�I NuNA�uN NhN�I��N pYNNVINII 1,Mi�II N N1;1; N uI kujmV l 1101ud���� ®o � Proposed Action Establish an annual physical inspection process for two-way radio repeaters, radar equipment, base stations and AIS. Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning, Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorms, Severe Winter Storms, Tornado, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: In House Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Internal Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCORP(RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 282 lPage !D>����eNANNAJ�Nannp�l�lV�NVNu�VNph��iN�NNH�Yhh�ldll!! ��II NNN�I� 11.11111000,011uuuuuuuuuuuiirr.,,.,, II00000mmmmm1lloo000 Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Purchase portable air condition ng un'ts to provide support for critical operations and information systems for use during HVAC or power outage. ACKGR UIU:15 fNFOI' MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Heat can cause irreparable damage to computer equipment. Portable units can provide temporary relief during a HVAC failure. Additionally, extreme heat conditions could cause certain critical facilities to become uninhabitable such as Harbor Master's Office and Security Command Center. Portable units can provide necessary temporary relief for personnel to continue operations. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATI N ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorm, Tornado Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCORP( RATIO1!41 T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE<< Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 283 lPage ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 284 1Page 0.D�� .V1[) u��saye,1Aa�� rl �� nnn� �i HuNA11N �r�1ulipil NNNNNNNNNNNNN�����01���aaaaa�gpuuuuuuuuu0oHill.„ 1100000000100,0" Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Assess the shoreline condtion along Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Nueces River and Nueces Bay and identify potential mitigation actions to prevent future shoreline erosion. AACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Prevent future shoreline erosion to protect critical habitat. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Lead Agency/Department Responsible: ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 285 lPage olnnmiu.�? iluuiu. 111111r1.10111 1115111111111111111 Proposed Action Install hurricane shutters or other appropriate high impact window protection to prevent breakage on port facilities where appropriate. ACKGR UIU:15 fNFOI MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Maintenance personnel have a window protection strategy for hurricanes however is time consuming. For short or no -notice events, most windows cannot be protected. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorms, Tornado Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $500,000 Potential Funding Sources: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NCCRP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 286 1Page uuuiD��u��u�y��Aa�N�'i1,1nnn� �INuHA�u11 1r1��NpYnnVlul�!u'' 111!i�riaq�NuNI�1N1Yq1lily Proposed Action Purchase diesel operated high capacity submersible pumps for dewatering operations. AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: This equipment is currently rented as needed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2019 NC RP RATIONI T 'EXISTING PLANS AND PI OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 287 1Page UD��1)„1uyNANNN���nnV1L1.1INNVNu�VNph��iNNNHU�htl��dll�IIIURu6�diw�'" I rre� ��� :. Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Purchase portable light towers for use at docks, guard shacks or near other critical facilities to ensure safe and continual operations of critical facilities ACKGR UIU:15 fNFOI MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: This type of equipment is currently rented as needed. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI+ ATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hailstorm, Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Windstorms, Severe Winter Storms, Tornado Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2019 NCCRP( RATIONI T LAN'S AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 288 lPage uuu� D�� uA�u�y��Aa�N; nnn1„ �I NuHA1!„„uHChph��„iNNY1Yhh1i. p lriuuia ,1111'k1Ii Proposed Action �1��Iliititid'411!WLi, Illljl ! Purchase/install additional flood proofing to facilities AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Several facilities are protected by sand bags only. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2019 NC RP( RATIONI T AND PF OCEL (JF ES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 289 1 If" ,n ; I11.1"nn4 �I NVNA�VN p �N Q1100H 11)111" 4NJ111.111(""1I (11.11.1:0 Proposed Action 1111111)dd �lddddddd� '�.u)III�I����IS Establish near shore vegetation buffer areas. AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Construction of ecosystem restoration features protect endangered species, wetlands, and sea grass. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection Hazard(s) Addressed: Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Hurricane/Tropical Storm Low Estimated Cost: $250,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Implementation Schedule: 2020 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 290 lPage y�� ��suyNAJNN �N� 11 nnp��1 NHVNu�VN ph��ifl�NHHUIhd11dl IIIURu6„dy,b," 0'1111 01,i3O)„...„y .„„ �aVVV 00IUUUuIUIIIu0090I"'I(N�1 Proposed Action niii0000I(Id11IR101 Public Fishing Area #1 & 2 Shoreline Stabilization ACKGR( UND INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Construction of ecosystem restoration features protect endangered species, wetlands, and sea grass. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Flood, Coastal Erosion Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $250,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC RP RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 291 103 ,n �11,10i nnn11111i HuHA��H��r��i��N p�nn�iul.! � 3,�t, Proposed Action Purchase spare VHF, UHF and Radar antennas, coax cable and surge protection for emergency installation. AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Backup equipment can be rapidly deployed when damaged by storm conditions to reduce operational downtown. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Lightning, Hurricane/Tropical Storms, Windstorm, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Sources: Port Security Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2019 INC()RPO EXISTING PLANS ANLL PRCCE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 292 lPage 010000000000000000001'110000;00000000nnp00lV0100VNuIJI0VNgh�h��ifl�NHH01hh1dlj I 10IpURNU ' o i 00” iM0110i WWII �aw.IV u1 I 11111111111 1111011111111 0001010011,1101 Proposed Action Heat Safety Policy Review and Update - Review department heat related safety policies, establish best practice and update safety procedures as determined appropriate. Site and Location: Risk Reduction Benefit: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Reduces vulnerability to extreme heat hazards Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations M ITIGATI N AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: Low Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2018 NCORP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OCEDURES ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 293 1 If" 000000 g 000000 ;;mill 1!1,pM.ww�� �1r���1!Ia�1(iiN�!�� "G9 iii Proposed Action Add additional infrastructure enhancements to prevent flooding at intersection ACKGR( UND INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NCCRP( RATIONI T LANS AND PF OC URE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 294 1 If" ,n Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Establish drought tolerance criteria for new landscaping and modify existing as appropriate to prevent loss and future erosion. ACKGR UND"INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Construction of ecosystem restoration features protect endangered species, wetlands, and sea grass. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Natural Systems Protection MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 INCORPO EXISTING PLANS ANLL PROCE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 295 lPage uuulD�� 1,j1),1"nn4IIlVIIIIIINVNA�VN1111pr1[NNYQ�htl,,dlIuRu��l11 H ihi u11411111111tititititititi,ii� 11111111111 111, 11111111m1 Proposed Action Elevate Oil & Cargo Docks to meet current flood plain standards, limit storm surge impacts and reduce sea level rise vulnerability. AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Dock operations are critical to the functionality of the port. Reducing damage potential will reduce potential for business interruption. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN AC1 AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $5,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2022 NCORP( RATION INT 'EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE<< ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 296 lPage nnn�.11.; II00000mmmmm1lloo000 Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Assess existing rail structures to identify mitigation actions to reduce extreme weather impacts that may alter rail function. INFO MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Rail operations are critical to the functionality of the port. Reducing damage potential will reduce potential for business interruption. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Min ATI N ACTION E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat, Severe Winter Storm, Drought, Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC RP RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE<< ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 297 1page UD>1 NUIuyNAJNN ( n� SIN NuNu N NhN�VN�NNN�YNNVINII liipiuu -.ga. Kntt,, Proposed Action �I(IdJ�IR�I Add additional gate valves at Cargo Dock 9 & 10, Maintenance Facility and the North Bank Open Storage Area ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Flooding will negatively impact functionality of port facilities by reducing access to critical facilities. Reducing flood potential will reduce potential for business interruption. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness MITIGATIbN ACTT N E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2020 NC RP RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 298 lPage uliiD�����suy�uAaNN��nnn��lNuHA�uHp���VN�NNH4YhtlV�dl'I�puuia�YN'Ni�i��p��u�u�N'��IiI� :. III �I�11'��NNNNNNNNNhhhnnnnnnn� II00000mmmmm1lloo000 Proposed Action �I(Id��IR�I Design and install foundation watering systems to buildings to reduce shrink/swell potential protecting these structures from movement. ACKGR UIU:15INFOI MAT Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: The Ports buildings are critical to the successful and safe operation of the Port. Foundation damage could render a facility inoperable causing significant business disruption. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITI GATI bN ACTION DETAIL; Hazard(s) Addressed: Drought, Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2022 mit(RPRATIN INTI° EXI"STI.NG LANS ANLL PRICE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 299 lPage lD����N�ANNAN�N.;nnN� �IV�HVNu�VNgy��h��I��N�Yhh1Id IIll111111 Proposed Action Assess existing joint seals to identify mitigation actions to reduce accelerated slab breakdown. AC. INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: The Ports lay down areas and parking lots are critical to the successful and safe operation of the Port. Slab damage could render a facility non -usable for certain critical business operations. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure MITIGATIbN AC71IU7AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Extreme Heat, Drought, Expansive Soils Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Low Estimated Cost: $20,000 Potential Funding Sources: General Budget Revenues Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2022 NC'RP( RATION INTI' EXISTING PLANS AND PF OCEDURE� ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 300 1Page ,ii71�K!hr Ibllilll�� Proposed Action �I(IdI�IR�I Reinforce shoreline levees for South Shore Cells A& B and Herbie A. Maurer Dredge Material Placement Areas. ACKGR( UND INFORI Site and Location: The Port of Corpus Christi Authority Risk Reduction Benefit: Current DMPA levee structures are vulnerable to damages associated with excessive rainfall and storm surge. These structures will require repair prior to reconstituting usage. Clearance of adjacent ship channels may be delayed awaiting lee repairs hindering rapid marine transportation system recovery. Type of Action: Local Plans and Regulations Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection Education and Awareness Structure and Infrastructure Natural Systems Protection MITIGATIbN ACTION E- AIL Hazard(s) Addressed: Hazards hurricane, flood Effect on new/existing buildings: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Moderate Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Implementation Schedule: 2022 NC RP RATIONI T L 3 AND PFtOCEDURE < ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: The following STAPLEE criteria were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 indicating the extent to which this action satisfies each consideration. (1= Does Not Satisfy 3 = Moderately Satisfies 5 = Strongly Satisfies) Socially Acceptable = 5; Technically Feasible =5; Administratively Possible =5; Politically Acceptable =5; Legal =5; Economically Sound =5; and Environmentally Sound =5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 19 301 lPage VIII11 " 11111111111 11 III 111111 fflI 1111 III 11111111111111111 II11Mmffil IIIIIII 11:1 L IIIIIIIIII Plan Maintenance Procedures 1 Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Updating 2 Continued Public Involvement 12 Plan Maintenance Procedures The following is an explanation of how the Planning Team will implement the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, and continue to evaluate and enhance it over time. In order to ensure that the Plan remains current and relevant, the following plan maintenance procedures will be addressed: • Ensure the mitigation strategy remains current and is implemented according to Plan procedures • Secure and maintain an ongoing mitigation program throughout the community • Integrate short and long-term mitigation objectives into community officials' daily roles and responsibilities • Continued Public Involvement and maintain momentum by routine engagement of the Plan's progress Monitoring and Evaluation Periodic tracking of the Plan is required to ensure that the goals, objectives, and mitigation action plans are implemented over time. Revisions may be necessary to ensure that the Plan is in full compliance with federal regulations and state statutes. This section outlines the procedures for completing such revisions, updates, and Plan review. Table 20-1 indicates the department or title responsible for this action. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 1 1 If" ,n Table 20-1. Team Members Responsible for Plan Maintenance Il,ill i, 111,11111( VIII(; Ilfjflll IUI Unincorporated Nueces County City of Agua Dulce City of Bishop City of Corpus Christi City of Driscoll City of Petronila City of Port Aransas City of Robstown Port of Corpus Christi Authority Emergency Management Coordinator Mayor Mayor Floodplain Manager Mayor Mayor Emergency Management Coordinator Fire Chief/Emergency Management Coordinator Public Safety Director/Manager of Emergency Management Monitoring The Multi -Jurisdictional HMAP planning team representing each participating jurisdiction will convene a meeting annually to monitor the plan and track the status of each jurisdiction's identified mitigation actions over the 5 -year cycle of the Plan. Nueces County as coordinating entity will make arrangements to bring the team together. Mitigation Actions will be assigned to team members in advance of the meetings to prepare status reports to share with the team. Mitigation action status updates will include continued feasibility for implementation and funding. Evaluation Each jurisdiction will evaluate changes in risk, determine whether the implementation of mitigation actions is on schedule, or if there are any implementation issues such as changes in stated purposes or goals that affect mitigation priorities in each participating jurisdictions' respective department or organization. The Plan Maintenance group will meet on an annual basis to identify any needed changes in the Plan based upon their evaluation activities. Updating Annual reports submitted by the designated Team member from each community evaluating the Plan will be used to keep the Plan updated. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 2 1 If" ,n Five Year Review The Plan will be thoroughly reviewed by the appointed Planning Team at the end of three years from the approval date to determine whether there have been any significant changes in the area that may necessitate changes in the types of mitigation actions proposed. Nueces County, as coordinating entity, will make arrangements to bring the team together and begin the update process 2 years prior to plan expiration. New flood studies and new development in flood -prone areas, an increased exposure to hazards, disaster declarations, the increase or decrease in capability to address hazards, and changes to federal or state regulations are examples of factors that may affect the content of the Plan. The Plan review provides the Planning Team an opportunity to evaluate those actions that have been successful and to explore documenting potential losses avoided due to the implementation of specific mitigation measures. The Plan review also provides the opportunity to address mitigation actions that may not have been successfully implemented as assigned. It is recommended that the Planning Team meet to review the Plan at the end of three years as grant funds may be necessary for the development of a five-year update. Due to the timelines for grant cycles, it is wise to begin planning grant options in advance of the five-year deadline. Following the review, any revisions deemed necessary will be summarized and implemented according to the reporting procedures and Plan amendment process outlined herein. Upon completion of the review and update/amendment process, the revised Plan will be submitted to TDEM for final review and approval in coordination with FEMA. Incorporating the Plan into Other Planning Mechanisms The County and participating entities will work to integrate the hazard mitigation strategies into other planning mechanisms. The Planning Team will ensure that future growth, disaster recovery, historic preservation, flood response plans, and other planning mechanisms will be consistent with the goals of the Plan. Key Planning Team members from the participating jurisdictions, will meet annually, and more often if warranted, to ensure mitigation actions prioritized as high to moderate are tracked and monitored based on federal Disaster Declarations, HMGP and PDM funding cycles, and other non-federal funding sources that would help communities meet the local HMA match. The potential funding sources listed for each identified action may be used when the Planning Team member begins to seek funds to implement actions. An implementation time period, or a specific implementation date, has been assigned to each action as an Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 3 1 P a incentive for completing each task and gauging whether actions are implemented in a timely manner. Existing plans for the participating jurisdictions will be reviewed in light of the Plan, and Team Members will incorporate any mitigation policies and actions into these plans as appropriate. Table 20-1 indicates Planning Team member roles for incorporating actions, method of incorporation, and approving authority. Table 20-2 identifies planning mechanisms available for the participating jurisdictions and provides examples of how the Plan will be incorporated into current efforts. Table 20-2. Planning Mechanisms and Method to Incorporate Into the Plan Annual Budget 0����lljll I��I�I�I�II�IIIIIIII"ui�i�i011j�lllll °'111111" ii our ryi yi l 1111111 Il II Funding mitigation projects and local match requirements Emergency Planning and Emergency Identifying hazards and assessing Operations Plan vulnerabilities Mutual Aid Agreements Assessing vulnerabilities/needs Floodplain Ordinance/ Stormwater Mitigation strategies; higher regulatory Management considerations Land Use Maps and New Flood Studies Critical Facilities Building and Zoning Codes State Hazard Mitigation Plan Assessing vulnerabilities and flood risk; development trends; long-term growth Location and protection Development trends; future growth Risk analysis It will be the responsibility of each participating jurisdiction to determine department or title of personnel responsible for implementation of mitigation strategies and implementation procedures. All jurisdictions will comply with local and state requirements while incorporating this Plan into existing planning mechanisms. A list of planning mechanisms available to the jurisdictions can be found in Appendix A. The mitigation actions in Section 19 describe the planning mechanisms into which the mitigation actions will be integrated. In the Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 4 1 P a process of integrating the mitigation actions into new and existing planning mechanisms, the participating jurisdictions will: • Nueces County — Actions will be presented to Commissioner's Court by the responsible department. Upon approval by Commissioner's Court, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Agua Dulce — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Bishop— Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Corpus Christi — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Driscoll — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Petronila — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • City of Robstown — Actions will be presented to City Council by the responsible department. Upon approval by City Council, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. • Port of Corpus Christi Authority - Actions will be presented to the Port Commission by the responsible department. Upon approval by the Port Commission, approved actions will be acted upon and/or integrated into existing planning mechanisms. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 5 1 P a Expansion of Capabilities Vatitaaaa\S��0\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ City Staff All participating jurisdictions have city or county staff. While the number and involvement of these staff members in the planning process varies, all participating jurisdictions benefit from the presence of staff members. Staff are involved in the planning process and the implementation of mitigation actions. Staff will be able to help planning team members, serve as stakeholders, and coordinate the monitoring and maintenance process of this Plan. Annual Budget Review All participating jurisdictions have an annual budget review. Jurisdictions will incorporate the Plan while conducting their annual budget reviews. High priority mitigation actions will be reviewed and may potentially receive funds to ttCQilaitl\SSS Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan County's stormwater management plan. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Emergency Operations The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvement Plan Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the County's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 6 1 If" a Wildfire Protection Plan Floodplain Order Emergency Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. The Plan will be used in updating the floodplain order and ensuring sound floodplain management. The goals of both documents are to reduce vulnerability to flooding hazards. The Plan will be consulted for NFIP compliance, flood risk, and extent. Information from this Plan will be reviewed for inclusion in other documents, including the floodplain order. Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 7 1 If" a SSSSSIIIIIIIIII\M\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan City's stormwater management plan. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the City's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Floodplain Management The Plan will be used in updating the floodplain management plan Plan and ensuring sound floodplain management. The goals of both documents are to reduce vulnerability to flooding hazards. The Plan will be consulted for NFIP compliance, flood risk, and extent. Information from this Plan will be reviewed for inclusion in other documents, including the floodplain management plan. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 8 1 If" a Y44i\slls)\\s Plan Comprehensive/Master Plan. It is important to ensure that development occurs in a manner that does not increase hazard risk. The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and probability of many natural hazards. By incorporating this information into the Comprehensive/Master Plan, development can be guided in a hazard -resilient manner. Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Plan City's stormwater management plan. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the City's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Stormwater Ordinance The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the City's stormwater ordinance. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 9 1 If" a \ ASSSSIIIIIII\M\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ NFIP Community Rating The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and System probability of flooding hazards. This information can and should be used in the City's Community Rating System (CRS) program. One of the major goals of the CRS program is to go above the minimum standards of the NFIP. Many of the mitigation actions identified in this Plan involve exceeding the minimum standards of the NFIP. By incorporating this Plan into the City's CRS program, the goals of flooding hazard reduction can be met. Floodplain Ordinance The Plan will be used in updating the floodplain ordinance and ensuring sound floodplain management. The goals of both documents are to reduce vulnerability to flooding hazards. The Plan will be consulted for NFIP compliance, flood risk, and extent. Information from this Plan will be reviewed for inclusion in other documents, including the floodplain ordinance. 0 u Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 10 1 If" a YlkfAx1.\\11.11.11\\\\\\Ilsl‘A\\ Plan Comprehensive/Master Plan. It is important to ensure that development occurs in a manner that does not increase hazard risk. The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and probability of many natural hazards. By incorporating this information into the Comprehensive/Master Plan, development can be guided in a hazard -resilient manner. Emergency Operations The City is part of the Nueces County Emergency Operations Plan. Plan The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the County's Emergency Operations Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the City's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Wildfire Protection Plan Several of the mitigation actions defined in this Plan relate to wildfire mitigation. When updating the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, this Plan should be consulted. Likewise, when planning or executing any of the wildfire mitigation actions in this Plan, the Community Wildfire Protection Plan should be consulted. Both plans have the ultimate goal of reducing the loss of property and life from wildfire hazards. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 11 1 If" a Comprehensive Master Plan Emergency Action Plan Comprehensive/Master Plan. It is important to ensure that development occurs in a manner that does not increase hazard risk. The Plan includes information regarding the location, extent, and probability of many natural hazards. By incorporating this information into the Comprehensive/Master Plan, development can be guided in a hazard -resilient manner. The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the PCCA's Emergency Action Plan. Both documents share the goal of public safety. Many of the mitigation actions in this Plan relate to emergency operations and must be integrated. Stormwater Management The Plan will be consulted when updating and maintaining the Program PCCA's stormwater management program. Both documents share the goal of reducing damage and minimizing the negative impacts of development on stormwater. Capital Improvements Many of the mitigation actions found in this Plan will be enacted Plan through capital improvement projects. Consequently, the PCCA's Capital Improvement Plan must consult the Plan for hazard mitigation projects that could be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan. Prioritization should be given to high priority actions. Continued Public Involvement Input from the stakeholders and public was an integral part of the preparation of this Plan and will continue as the Plan grows and changes. This Plan will be posted on the Nueces County website where local officials and the public will be invited to provide ongoing feedback. The task of notifying stakeholders and community members on an annual basis will be held with the identified Nueces County Planning Team members tasked with updates and annual Plan review. The Planning Team will have the added task of maintaining the Plan as a part of their job description. Media such as the local newspaper and radio stations will be used to notify the public of any maintenance or periodic review activities taking place. Public participation will be sought during the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation phases of the plan. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Section 20 12 1 If" ,n III ffiffiffiffi imm milimm. ASS % Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix A 1 1 If" a Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Nueces County Name and Title: EMC Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan None Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance X Master Draining plan Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan X Floodplain Management Plan X Economic Development Plan X Regional Transportation Plan X Part of Regional Transportation Agency Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance No NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance X Order Building Code (include name/year under Comments) No Zoning Ordinance No Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open X Ongoing maintenance. Space/Recreation Use X Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement, Coastal Bend Council of Governments Master Mutual Aid Agreement 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Ongoing maintenance. Mutual Aid Agreements (between neighboring jurisdictions) X Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement, Coastal Bend Council of Governments Master Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X Emergency manager X Floodplain manager X Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) X Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer X Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official No 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Financial Resources Yes No Comments Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via website and facebook. Ongoing Emergency/Hurricane Prepapredness activity and outreacxh year round. S. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list; any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Auga DuIce, Tx Name and Title: MayorHoward/EMC Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan None Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance No ordinance or current storm water system Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan None Floodplain Management Plan None Economic Development Plan None Transportation Plan Part of Regional Transportation Agency routes. Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X As part of the Nueces County Plan Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance No NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance No Building Code (include name/year under Comments) No Zoning Ordinance No Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open X Ongoing maintenance. Space/Recreation Use ESD 5 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Ongoing maintenance. Mutual Aid Agreements (betweenX neighboring jurisdictions) ESD 5 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X Contract service. Emergency manager X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Floodplain manager No Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) No Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer No Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official No 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Financial Resources Yes No Comments Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via email. S. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list; any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Bishop, Tx City Secretary Contreras/EMC Name and Title: Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY - Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations in thespace provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan X Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance X Part of master plan Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan X Floodplain Management Plan X Economic Development Plan X Regional Economic Development Plan Transportation Plan Part of Regional Transportation Agency routes. Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X As part of the Nueces County Plan Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance X NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance X Building Code (include name/year under Comments) X ICC 2004 Zoning Ordinance X Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open X Ongoing maintenance. Space/Recreation Use ESD 3 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff I Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Ongoing maintenance. Mutual Aid Agreements (betweenX neighboring jurisdictions) ESD 3 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X Contract service. Emergency manager X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Floodplain manager X Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) X Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer X Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official X 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Financial Resources Yes No Comments Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via email. S. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list; any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 ca Oval* ity A0.0 potsord 51,itygy Jori5dict on rt f r :hepta;: City of Corpus Christi: pit.t.kit 1411.6 `ti$l lila! itC�dr f: Pt RC tHNG AN EGULATORY CAP BIU Y;:-' PIBase Inthcate wh tt r th@ toIbwin pl nr� ng or r gufaio tools Glans, ord rsa css, c ass ar pr rams a curra.ntly )n pia�a or. under:d velopmeni for>youridnsdfction Pl ase,pr94de;adR onal;comments;or:.ex�slanaiians its>the space prow+ded or:,with at€achments ',: i ^i(:•:::�[ .r•t:''+�sr;l.>,�'+'�'!'�.:Mz •':=y{z'S - rS ; .3. i"?•� .. ••,t./-'.> .�'1 r •!�' : > '� •r-`,„ i;° ' .ii'):: - :. 1-• :"'':� i,>v . <.:v:;::s•:CIG::::i:`•s�'�i.�:r-;:;•;',•�:r .\. �,r .):. �. . a1•.}t F.1tf p{�. � 1N1 iC" 5[ [.,*.w.!{ ': v#.':. i!'WS" ,S , r ��"•,"3Z •i'i.j 311 r•:$- :;%r. %rte ., \•'% <or Comprehensive i asterPlan Stormwater Management Pian 1 Ord ncarice r:��'''H•:o •:'-,[+!^'! >`>•r ,3':. :) ✓.' �' f.�. .,..! :::r .,.�l}4.•.v ''r'i� i�'y {t'��1� ; 1 'C1_ i;C",..FiII..' %!<a. 'r,)>, ::i .i::.:3 .J.:��; �1'i .. . -.Jh:1'::�i �.1}Ir':. > f,.. . t., i1•':t'•r: . -SA EI � , r�si rS• [[[bbb bT� :,-A� �[� I: `.' ;k%.fi` ,v'r': =.!TiY� ..�F'Ili: �:SJ ��•�l'✓'i.�'T , "s r/i 4i is `•`•i ::t•:,• :.;: xP >`r .. ,: # i1St•r�.:, ,e S aNl'�`..):��.L r! .;;:1.. r.i,., .'l, T,���.✓ Y S, u:i.i.Y. f >'ir;�e3V,;'r"?;;. „i)€CiLCfB. !'i')I /.�., >..rJr. r'%+.1.,.:.. „rr:.� '-�•=^""' .,,)r' ...T'I:�{ >•'? ,r..i.. .'% :i •., 1. „r ? .✓ , - :(''/'1 rl �'..( -a Jj'�. .".f..� .i fr i.•�:,:1 ii,'�.. )i�l: �:i: %�•�i,'�. �: ,ri".5..� Z,s �>. l�.�-'S.t^='l,,r•,.�•� I Emergency Operations Plan Capital Improvements ?fan Fioodpiain Management Pian Economic Development Plan...... .... Transportation Pian Continuity of Operations Pian W ldlire Protection Plan1111 XMil 3r x . =Sts :<:y` ) Ire' p,�q 'r /.' �rst'!In(� j,� i1. s i{�l "-'� w r•;!'�. s>'':' Nom:.,.., ::Gix;J . � .,/• jn ':.'. �M1 ra_.�. r�r�,p•; � sr• �y- 3 , ��••`•':�:'.`<i :;-= �'1..,a'::% 1. r• _ :. �•�:ii •,•,!:: ?;:::;i'r'•' ?;i.' :a:'s:: is tri �;?iii';:'� -�.' siarisfwater ON inanck : '.•j[. NFIP Community Ran t.Systern ...... (ORS. Program) Floodplain Ordinance . .' :. Building Code (include name/yaw under Cornmenis) .ZOnintg 0 Mance MI . 201.5 Air r e :.. ... . ... Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use ' LcCalapavbility-Aswan. t Survey... I1\i1 TIVEANOTEdHNicA c ' I i'rt ? € 3 #tier Ofi501010141Y41r0P0 ittgO011owin otaff t 0.91- er wih1rt Its rrrnnt t#r a 00l> 0sporca0' riS.Jl,„;...,,,A,..6,,, Z.Y.C.'��.�- ,�.'>�;..i...� .r.,:rs . pi.„g!sono,a :L.i,�..[•'ys!r +-n"s,Rir.•ji:..!_'.;7•.e::..':t%.i.,.,:./.,LL,.> i.lT. ��r.?s;7::;s;�<,:�. .k , ��n"f�.'2wt.P,lr,.?:. l ::il �s.,_•l.c•3.:.�1."-.a, fi.Q.. .>r,,. . ���n:.Tx1, u,i;.:(!�:-,:•i:rr�<.r`,�r:c- '%`�i>:'r=. l '4T.r.r-,, �v /✓.-�.% �i.-0/7rl i%.r-'fi.�.: •.:l.rsl<.T.#.r.\,•'4,,'.0<---• :,^ .••"s ,.4�"// ri•,l, ,rrsri\^_,teM!•..;,,a:.•�r r-{{t•�:• •.'f �ir'.:c.. }(. a,-,;;.?i •,%:j✓..:a:;',;:....r.i\..;�,•.. .!� 'r`.,.Sr:y:r".i..:<>..$)i�;:...,;':,i.,�L�,51.�7�•..3.3':.:,.';,,.=.i:�#. J•„'C'...�Jr/.,'r•a.:r'�r�, . . o )'s- ,',.rSf •;1Y%,r,....,..,,.. ;"!. Maintenance program t4 reduce risk . {tree trimming, clearing drainage systems} t+ t lual Nd Agreements (between neighboring }wsdictkns) . " Miligallon Nanning Carrratee Community Planner SI If Engineer &snergency manager. ..: X k. . Floodplain manager f ersonnel skilled to GeographEc . . intonation Systems (GIS) . Warning SysterrisfouWoof 'srert, reverse 01 1, oiler.. Grant Writer .:. 1.1azard Delaihistorical. disaster date Chief Bulding.Cllidal 74 . 3. FISCAL CAPAWITY Please indtcate whether your ]urisOiction has access to or to use ;the following Et cat flnanc[al resources far:h r rruiigatian pwposes s eligible: . r t , �4ii �.•: mss:- ,r .'=•l.� �Ss. if: n:a,-i-•., is r. .-... Capital Itriprov.ernent Programming .•:x r - cF is'�'• ,..1 :;; !,� _ r-:/..::,•:.^: #1.7,RIM - -•'J :. ,<1::. - -i: �•�•;...�.>,•�;. Commmurnity. Development Block Grants (CDlIG) Page 2 of 3 Sto€tr F.e .. Development lmpaetF .s. Attm'lsrrity tolevy taxes Cor spe.citjc: purposes 1:L".E UCA iON ANI] fl13TRE ACH Please idar€tlfy any 0,000 ion and optre4clt programs. nd.;€t� thuds aiready;fn place that could bp;used to fro ptq.me sl n igation:ac.ttyr cam' rrzunlcate hazard related lnfQrrnation such as school prograrrts, StorfReady, P,raWls .ptr rams, nviranmsntat protecfinr ; i vacuatipn;plan, erriergar�cy preparedn ss pi # Ilc;: ;:; sducation'programs S.; ii Rapdy., # aver 0.al ri. Pi.tO BfRad.pifng, :gP.R V O, S lel' 1GATIOWAOTItli''tE ;P(eas :Eist'any,previot s mitigatior .actMties(e g str rcturai adproleets ar gr €rts) that haus beery i wt1E ba::l• or your pommunityxis:Ploase include :'Ana ,titie;of the.:project:orgrant:along with any, start or.;complet{an:,:::: dates and the department or agency responsible; f-age3of2 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Petronila, Tx Name and Title: Mayor Burkhardt/EMC Boyce 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please ndicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional comments or explanations. in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan None Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance No ordinance or current storm water system Emergency Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Capital Improvements Plan None Floodplain Management Plan None Economic Development Plan None Transportation Plan Part of Regional Transportation Agency routes. Continuity of Operations Plan X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Wildfire Protection Plan X As part of the Nueces County Plan Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance No NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) NA Floodplain Ordinance No Building Code (include name/year under Comments) No Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Zoning Ordinance Yes No No Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use X No 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources Staff 1 Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) X Mutual Aid Agreements (betweenX neighboring jurisdictions) ESD 3 as part of the Nueces County Mutual Aid Agreement Mitigation Planning Committee X Community Planner X No Staff Engineer X No Emergency manager X As part of the Nueces County Emergency Management Plan Floodplain manager No Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) No Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Reverse Alert/Reverse 911 through MetroCom Grant Writer No Hazard Data/historical disaster data X Historical records and memory of officials/residents. Chief Bulding Official No 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY —Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to of to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Financial Resources Yes No Comments Capital Improvement Programming X Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) X Stormwater Utility Fees X Development Impact Fees X Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes X Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protection, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Will circulate information to residents via email. 5. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that have been or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates and the department or agency responsible. Part of the Coastal Bend HMAP 2007 & 2012. Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: City of Robstown Name and Title: Ricardo Gonzalez, EMC 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY -Please indicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances,codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction. Please provide additional oomments or explanations in the space provided or with attachments. Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan X Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance x Emergency Operations Plan x Capital Improvements Plan x Floodplain Management Plan Economic Development Plan x Transportation Plan x Continuity of Operations Plan Wildfire Protection Plan x Under Nueces County Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Comments Stormwater Ordinance NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) x Floodplain Ordinance x Ordinance No. 785 Building Code (include name/year under Comments) x International Building Codes 2012 Zoning Ordinance x Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use x Main Street Properties Page 1 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY -Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnelresources Staff / Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) x Robstown Utility Systems has a tree trimming program Mutual Aid Agreements (between neighboring jurisdictions) X Corpus Christi, Annaville, Bluntzer, Bishop, Driscoll, Petronilla Mitigation Planning Committee x Ricardo Gonzalez, Javier Zapata, Herman Rodriguez, Beatriz Charo Community Planner x Staff Engineer x Emergency manager x Floodplain manager X City Inspector is designated as the Floodplain Administrator Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) X Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other X Grant Writer x Hazard Data/historical disaster data Chief Bulding Official x FISCAL CAPABILITY,- Please indicate whether your jurisdjction has access to or is eligible; to use thefollowing local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes Capital Improvement Programming Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) x Page 2 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Stormwater Utility Fees Development Impact Fees Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Other: 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH -Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that could be used to implement mitigation activities and communicate hazard -related information such as school programs, StormReady, FireWise programs, environmental protect on, evacuation plan, emergency preparedness, public education programs. Evacuation Annex E, Annual Evacuation Drill, Annual Hurricane Conference (Local), Participate in Nueces County Wildfire Plan 5. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects or grants) that havebeen or will be implemented for your community. Please include the title of the project or grant along with any start or completion dates andthe department or agency responsible. Fire Department Emergency Generator- Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, completed 2/2009 Wastewater Generator- Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, completed 7/2009 Emergency Shutters, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, completed 1/2009 Page 3 of 3 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction and/or Dept.: Port of Corpus Christi Authority Name and Title: Tom Mylett, Director of Port Security 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY Please indicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans Planning / Regulatory Tool In Place. Under Development Comments Comprehensive / Master Plan Yes N/A Bulk Terminal Master Plan, Strategic Plan and associated Strategic Action Plans Stormwater Management Plan / Ordinance Yes N/A Storm Water Management Program - Rev. 1 01/23/2012 and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program- Rev. 5 11/01/11 Emergency Operations Plan Yes N/A Emergency Action Plan Effective Date 01/1/14 Capital Improvements Plan Yes N/A Annual Capital Improvements Plan Ten Year Capital Improvements Plan Bulk Terminal Master Plan La Quinta Security Plan Fire Water Pressurization Study Rail Master Plan Corpus Christi Metro Transporation Plan (Participant in MPO) Floodplain Management Plan Yes N/A Covered by City and County FMPs. Design to one year above the flood plain. Economic Development Plan Yes N/A Coastal Bend Council of Governments Regional Economic Development Plan Transportation Plan Yes N/A Metropolitan Planning Organization Continuity of Operations Plan No Yes In progress Wildfire Protection Plan Yes N/A Nueces County Community Wildfire Protection Plan- Nueces County OEM Planning/ Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development, Comments Stormwater Ordinance Yes N/A City ordinances where applicable. NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) Yes N/A Corpus Christi only Floodplain Ordinance Yes N/A Cities and Counties Building Code (include name/year under Comments) Yes N/A 2015 International Codes: International Code Council (ICC) 2015 - International Building Code (IBC) - Existing Building Code - Energy Conservation Code - Fuel Gas Code - Mecahnical Code - Plumbing Code - National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) National Electric Code Zoning Ordinance Yes N/A City ordinances where applicable. Acquisition of Land for Open Space/Recreation Use Yes N/A Strategic Action Plan - Be an Environmental Leader; Public Fishing Area; La Quinta Buffer Areas 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff Staff / Personnel Resources Yes No Comments Maintenance program to reduce risk (tree trimming, clearing drainage systems) Yes N/A Maintenance Department Mutual Aid Agreements (between neighboring jurisdictions) N/A No All cities and counties are party to regional master mutual aid agreement. Port of Corpus Christi Authority is currently not a party. Mitigation Planning Committee Yes N/A Established in support of current planning effort Community Planner N/A No Staff Engineer Yes N/A Engineering Department Emergency manager Yes N/A Emergency Management Department Floodplain manager No Covered by City and County FMs Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Yes N/A Environmental Planning & Compliance Department Page 1 of 2 Local Capability Assessment Survey Warning Systems/outdoor siren, reverse 911, other Yes N/A Outdoor warning siren at Bulk Termnial facility, Reverse Alert (Everbridge) Grant Writer Yes N/A Finance Department Hazard Data/historical disaster data Yes N/A Risk Management Department. Data available for past five years only. Chief Bulding Official Yes N/A David L. Krams, P.E. 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has access to or is eligible to use the following local financial Financial Resources Yes Np : ' Comments Capital Improvement Programming Yes N/A Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) N/A No Not eligible Stormwater Utility Fees N/A No Development Impact Fees N/A No Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Yes N/A Authority however do not currently levy (have never in history of organization- 90 years) Other: Authority to level fees (tariffs) for specific purposes Yes N/A 4. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH - Please identify any education and outreach programs and methods already in place that Conduct extensive training through multiple venues under the Environmental Management System and Storm Water Compliance Programs. 5. PREVIOUS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES - Please list any previous mitigation activities (e.g. structural and/or planning projects Storm Water Upgrades - upgrades to existing systems (JFC, Sigmor, North Bank) to improve runoff, installation of gate valves; Nueces River Fishing Area Drainage Improvements; Green Design Guidelines and Environmental Checklists for Construction and Design; Fire Boat Addition and Construction of New Fire Boat; Dock Facillity; Fire Fighting Capability Evaluation Page 2 of 2 mummummummum.num1111111111?1?1111111111111 1111111 1111111B mull! IPY Overview 1 Public Survey Results 2 Overview Nueces County prepared a public survey with questions for the public concerning their opinions regarding natural hazards. The survey was made available on the Nueces County website. Survey results are depicted on the following pages, showing the percentage of responses for each answer. For questions that did not provide a multiple- choice answer, or that required an explanation, comments are summarized where similar. Figure B-1: Screen Shot of Public Survey Link on Nueces County Website 1111 11111111 1111111111110 Iwo 1111111 IIIIIIIIIII1J1J1u1111J11111111111111111111111111111111111111,111,11,11,11111,11111111,11IIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111"" (Ill o 111111111 11111111111111 to litylowl 00000.00000000000000000:0000,00:0:0:0:0:0:0:000:10:00011,00111,11,00,1001010001:111,100000:0000 0:00.00:000000000011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101,11:1111,1:11 1 .0101161 1000000001 000 00111111110 160001 NA. 1111111100110 NOJKlety trre# AVVIM the ,'OSIWNIAW 042'0%44 INO 461101*,4 [Mom MOO IVIP* 000/pl* NAV kott and woo* on 14.41K, Cdo,ny, "ma , AN6o11,4•00111, Ketat MOO: And clrA ,xo *tan iry argot/WI compavrift. to v6„umone04 0.44frlonadtclormal 1,4600,Mrpot, ,,1114;b0,n11,11,01$ fiNt404 ,„otim keorp 11ed rovve &WA .01,"01.1,01110 P,,Oft 'AK/ KrAfiAt Ntafl Ab000f De as 440,0,M ,livs reoAttim qosow40,1 It I% *AI Oupory 1110.46* worA4 6,10"100.00100WIY 44011n4fInvAIMEZItive MIM,010,01( NOM., 1,0 ,M11,1,1,10,,,,,,,,(...rnrnerWIIMMI...1,10M1,1,0101,41.4.1.M1,1,0101,11,1%,./M ,(.1,010/0,1,11M .11M,M,00.10,11M, IMIMMOW,IIMONN,11,110, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 11Page Public Survey Questions & Results Question #1: n� To� nc Answer Options MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 Please state the jurisdiction city or community) in which you reside or represent. t. ul, Unincoirpo 000s C 11111111111111111111111111 Unincorporated Nueces County City of Corpus Christi City of Robstown City of Port Aransas Town of Bishop Town of Driscoll Town of Agua Dulce Town of Petronila Port of Corpus Christi Authority Other (please specify) City ot Chill ill qty Response Percent Response Count 16.7% 2 50.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 2 1 IP o Question #2 tio 4E4 t` ,)i MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 Have you ever experienced or been impacted a natural disaster? Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Yes No If you answered Yes, please describe: If "yes", please explain: 58.3% 4L7% Number If you answered Yes, please describe: 1 Tornado and flooding in Austin, Texas 2 Hurricane Celia and Carla and other minor hurricanes. H1N1 Pandemic 3 Hurricane Allen 4 Flooding, strong winds, tornadoes, drought hurricanes, extreme temperature 5 Every time it rains a significant amount the neighborhood goes underwater 7 5 5 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 3 1 If" ,n Question #3 »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»„»�,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, How concerned are you about the possibility ofyour community i impacted by a natural disaster yet Concerned 4) Answer Options Extremely Concerned Somewhat Concerned Not Concerned Extremely Concerned 66.67% i8 Response Percent Response Count 66.7% 8 33.3% 4 0.0% 0 answered question skipped question Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 4 1 If" ,n 12 0 Question #4 RI „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 ease select the natural hazard you ti I presents the HIGHESThryour neig borhood. Windstorm ,„ .67% 100 uuuuuuuuiiluuuuuuuuuuuuiuuuuuuuuuuuuiiluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui ooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooloolooli 11111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111vivi 7 Hlaruricanu a xplcal Storm Answer Options Severe Wind Drought Extreme Temperature Flood Hailstorm Hurricane/Tropical Storm Windstorm Lightning Tornado Wildfire Severe Winter Storm Earthquake k Flood 41.67% Response Percent Response Count 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4L7% 5 0.0% 0 4L7% 5 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 5 1 If" ,n Question #5 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Please select the natural hazard you thunk represents the SECOND HIGHEST threat your neighborhood Severe Winter Storm 8.33'4 (1) Tornado 16.67,y (2) Windstorm 43,67% (2) Extreme Temp a tune 8.33% „pi )111,1.,.1,1,1,1)).,11,1)11,1,1,1,1,1,1,V111111111111Ifill 111111111111111111119 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111010 Flood 16.,67% (2) IHurr issue Storm p Answer Options Response Response Percent Count Severe Wind 0.0% 0 Drought 0.0% 0 Extreme Temperature 8.3% 1 Flood 16.7% 2 Hailstorm 0.0% 0 Hurricane/Tropical Storm 33.3% 4 Windstorm 16.7% 2 Lightning 0.0% 0 Tornado 16.7% 2 Wildfire 0.0% 0 Severe Winter Storm 8.3% 1 Earthquake 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 6 1 If" ,n Question #6 IIMINIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIIMINIMMIMINIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIEIMIIMIMINIMMUMNIMMUMMUMEOMMIMMIMMIMMIMMIMMIMMIM212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121.1.01.01MEOMMIZMI12121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121,2 Is there another natural hazard not listed above that you think represents wide- scale threat r neighborhood? Lt yes, please explain: 11 11 o I Yes No Iff you answered Yes... Answer Options 9.09% 18.118% 72.73% O% 1O% 20% 30% 4O F5 50% 60% 70% 8O% 90% 100% Yes No If you answered Yes, please describe. If yes, please explain: Number If you answered Yes, please describe. 1 Brush fires no hydrant 2 Water contamination My lack of proper drainage Response Response Percent Count 9.1% 1 72.7% 8 18.2% 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 7 1 If" ,n Question #7 IIMIN1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11,11.1.1.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.1MMIMMIMMIMMIM212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121PIMMIMMIMMIZOMMIMMUMMUMIN1212121212121212121212121212121.1MMIMMIMMIMMIZOMMIMMUMMUMMUMMUUM121212121212121EMNIZOMMIMMIMMIZOMMIMMUMMUMMUMMUMMUMMUMMMI No 33+33 Answer Options Yes No I'm not sure s your M info Morn. me locate in a floodplahi? Yes 58.337 7) Response Response Percent Count 58.3% 7 33.3% 4 8.3% 1 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 8 1 If" ,n Question #8 111.1.1.1.11,11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.1.MINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMIN1212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121211221212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121,2 Do you have fl I'm not 16474 (2) ood insurance?' la:.ta sage real 2 f,'.3k pl',1,c01'.; 0, 41.67% (5). Answer Options Ye 41.67% 0) Response Response Percent Count Yes 41.7% 5 No 41.7% 5 I'm not sure 16.7% 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 91Page Question #9 111.1.1.1.11,11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.11,11.1.MINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMINIMIN1212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121211221212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121,2 I you do not have flood insurance, why not? Answered: swinped 0% 10% 20% 30% 400j 50% 60% 70% 800/0 90% 100% am not located in the floodplain. Flood insurance Lis too expensive. Flood insurance is not necessary because my location never floods. Flood insurance is not necessary because 1 am elevated or otherwise protected. 1111111111111111111111111 1 have never considered flood insurance. I have flood insurance.. Answer Options I am not located in the floodplain. Flood insurance is too expensive. Flood insurance is not necessary because my location never floods. Flood insurance is not necessary because I am elevated or otherwise protected. I have never considered flood insurance. I have flood insurance. Response Response Percent Count 10.0% 1 40.0% 4 0.0% 0 20.0% 2 0.0% 30.0% 3 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 10 1 Question #10 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Have you taken any actions to ah your home or nei'hborhood more resistant to nature hazar s? Vfi Answer Options Yes No If you answered Yes, please describe: What have you done? 41,67% 1 Response Response Percent Count 4L7% 5 58.3% 7 2 Number If you answered Yes, please describe: 1 Windows 2 Applied for FEMA grant but was denied Grant through Nueces County That was reallocated Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 11 1 If" ,n Question #11 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Are you interested I k neighborhood more .s hazards? No 33 n"i your hoFile or nt natural 91,67! Answer Options Response Response Count Percent Yes 9L7% 11 No 8.3% 1 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 12 1 If" ,n Question #12 MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 What is the most effect ve way for you to receiveormation about how to make your home and neighborhood more resistant to natural hazards? Public wo ksh,op &a 41.67% (5) Answer Options to rotql News «% N ,11,1,1,1,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 fr ° °"PJPJIIIIIINW11fi uuu1 // a uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Newspaper Television Radio Internet Mail Public workshops/meetings School meetings Mall 16.67% (2) Television 16.67% (2) Internet 113.67% (2, Response Response Count Percent 8.3% 1 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 16.7% 2 41.7% 5 0.0% 0 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 13 1 If" ,n Question #13 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 In your opinion, what are some steps your local government could take to reduce or eliminate the risk of future natural hazard damages in your neighborhood? Fuli llic Education &... Safe Shelters Strengthen Building... Other (please specify) Answer Options 8.33®f 16.67% 33.33% 66.67% 0% 10% 2.0% 30% 40% 50% 60,% 70% 880% 90% 100% Response Response Count Percent Public Education & Awareness 66.7% 8 Safe Shelters 8.3% 1 Strengthen Building Codes/Requirements 33.3% 4 Other (please specify) 16.7% 2 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 14 1 Ii" ,n Question #14 MI„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I„»I,,,»IN,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,1,2 What other issues regarding the reduction of risk and loss associated with natural hazards or disasters in the community do you find important? Number Response Text 1 Resources available to the public 2 Citizens Corp so neighbors can help each other as resources will be difficult to reach everyone in a timely manner. 3 Having a plan in place is important 4 Awareness of the possibility 5 Public information & educational material distribution 6 Help from local government 7 Safety precautions on industrial row 8 Reduction and flood and windstorm insurance costs Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 15 1 If" ,n Question #15 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, »,»»,»„»MIMMI„M12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 A number of community -wide activities can reduce the risk from natural hazards. In general, these activities fall into one of the following six broad categories. Please tell us how important you think each one is for your community to consider pursuing. Prevention AdImli nistlratV,,.. Pro pe Protection s we red 112 SkIIPPeci Natural Resource... Structural Projects Emergency Services Publiic. E c!ucati on an... D% 110°,o 20°',`o 30% 4O0 50'% 60% 70% 80% 90% 140%°o Very porta it �� Somewhat Ilrportant Not Important Answer Options Prevention - Administrative or regulatory actions that influence the way land is Very Somewhat Not Response Important Important Important Count 10 2 0 12 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 16 1 If" ,n developed and buildings are built. Examples include planning and zoning, building codes, open space preservation, and floodplain regulations. Property Protection - Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings to protect them from a hazard or removal 7 5 0 12 from the area. Examples include acquisition, relocation, elevation and structural retrofits. Natural Resource Protection - Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses, also preserve or restore the functions of 11 1 0 12 natural systems. Examples include floodplain protection, habitat preservation, and riparian buffers. Structural Projects - Actions intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by modifying the natural progression of the hazard. Examples include dams, levees, seawalls, detention/retention basins, channel modification, retaining walls and storm sewers. 10 2 0 12 Emergency Services - Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after an event. Examples 10 1 0 11 include warning systems, evacuation planning, and protection of critical emergency facilities or systems. Public Education and Awareness - Actions to inform citizens about hazards and the techniques they can use to protect 12 0 0 12 themselves and their property. Examples include outreach projects, library materials and demo events. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 17 1 P a Question #16 „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „» „»MI,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»,,,»„»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»,»»a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a, 1ZOM IMMIM12,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,a»,121,2 Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns? Answer Options Response Count 4 Number Response Text 1 Invite citizens to participate in exercises and drills that would impact their communities. Hands on is an efficient way to learn how to help in disasters. 2 none 3 We have limited drainage, no fire hydrants, no medical emergency clinics, no drinking water in some areas, 4 FEMA and Nueces county failed to provide assistance for the last three major disasters we had. The reason they failed to provide assistance is because we had flood and wind insurance. But the flood and wind insurance would only cover a small percentage of our loss which exceeded $20,000 +. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 18 1 If" ,n Question #17 If you would like to receive additional updates and notifications related to the multi jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plana please enter your email address below. Answer Options Response Count 7* * Personal emails were omitted from these results for privacy. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix B 19 1 P a Pmi rim 1111111111 I 11111111 i �m poll � etpum 1 I Public Announcements 2 Kickoff Planning Meeting Invitation, January 4, 2017 5 Kickoff Meeting Sign -In Sheets, January 4, 2017 6 Kickoff Meeting PowerPoint Presentation, January 4, 2017 8 Webinar Meeting, March 3, 2017 12 HMAP Natural Hazards Ranking Sheet 13 Mitigation Action Workshop, March 29, 2017 14 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 1 1 If" ,n Public Announcements C4Insty Muu1 Harm Attic ha ittrt Ihtie ielotrir ft ONO ether. Com t „whew' , thothoptott or Jnih* s, or to totog toottrogy:',Agitt tttoo, ottIO *tot' 1°414°4'4 kotatiM tptmaittooke55555 55lit40055titthltt tlikotgkottow ttota hytrolottp trnotapIrtttY11,,Attiot ittakiltwit4 1.160 leitttkl14 oora 'Pet hoh555r 5541mo %moot homes 'Cho 0,4%44,4 $tv hao die htottettomitt oto retpoot ,prt, iNgs,A40 N, 14** tioN, NINNIMPANi pkotigNIN INNINNINNNt 0,104 AroNNONNttegN, Not& titto gotaitogtogot ' ,roro or bane mom* tooryw, r, prit, ogehok ir-toopmethd Photo,* Chevy, too ewe oln 4,41„ Pec*,„ Baem Chou* P „ Pon ,;Usteht, hod Iteetevoti ;,„„. 'tt; 4 Of 701 ,,,re CAVA attn, AfOlfoffroft Vpo Anttvt. „ad Plact htotootet lb* Cheap, „tattl ratratto , rtztt/entat ibex ; „got* to ott „Art o; Atth PtettA; pox t ; Vez.ie; ttetzottte. AO4Oftliff* itOtM , Moo Int to& otht Oh tett ;„, had ast0rome= „etc plethom tot tirio *VI., ti,argt leave tot ttigtt 55555554 155 ttikt, 5 5547 1555155 Ma, pith Awl' 7 ottet tot, tetheio Att theca, so hem hoe top 7 -hoot thot difoOkool logforegiomo of totoolio., 1004 kmao, floRooOhgoof111155555555555 rof tpe,o. of 04 740401,1 CO fikofffoo Off ooffookot $ Attitalkitte liNtota ' • t Att/ 1455555515544 4555555/5544 5541555511555554 ritiftitPtIgAlt 4114titil1 ntttlIftet tkovort, 55455y551 55515455 54 ttirotptOt poo.„‘tom 55555555555 1555555555555515555511555555 „toote hoottmotto NO' ' 04t00f555555 555555000016 ttrt port 4 77,40,44400,4 Pittiotott 4 Pew Itt;ottoto, rttotttorn, ItttAtiltt 5555555 555555554I51 15445555555555555SSSSOnCLAN 5555555*455555545 55ItApittpetttoolf 515551 551*55155 tto4rmott.thilutt 0g0010.414011! t9ttlf 111191004444 trltdONAPINANtit0016000045550000* trovisowem p000554 onOt000ffoo ote theusettent sod death ate tramethe; Pecettor 4/15555.55:5544455544.4 :Agog), pe=4 t4445545s041 4404re55. CA*, t et rept VolcS4r:O. 4415545444445455.Paz* Luxe: hem toe 0040:55'•4554 .02455 hOor toJ, leave fob moo 15O ; ittewir irg argil thoototoot Ago:go bp! togorttos 04 ret totteetoet 45415514 55* Noon too Kowa; foo/fro : 4455w4),o4515.4i trot to wawa oat progoott Ottotgoof 'too& ood *tot p44fOOOtos ffogrAf fintfOOMM IfttofiffOX4 Peeht hteetteres ftrifti55555555444 04=0/44: Velf gtOtOr 551151445511 Pf WO& 1155555tItHI t15t55555/55555 helot, pteittstit Ittot titahrt .e.eistotote„ Vothamett mot* litet 55*4454455l55-44 55555 5545 5555 51 155454444 tt$ efacrf, VOW 1511541 4444445555 r*Oft. ' felfectON "Ofolthfitg= boot dot roe to rotors, 5554455445555 45* At .Stot tWo,:iff 541 551 5555 tVor, 0044 110 140 CAM(55 tOttporoo flax mom 444551555, "f* soot fo ghee* Pentelsoott „P 6544515 tar atO OP/040104 e4544"1440. ttog fOri ffifO fort:hot', /1554s 5515, k0000dlo mo.f ,00t.goo* oifomo 45r, fookfolo 'W0000di 5144555, titiktki "woo etheo S95554 hottott. NOW.* r,Hi4i AWL MO& moot 16.0 544 455455445551 15555: :tvt, 44p4*55 , offi Wino IMIttabtia 55t*4554455 t1stt#40/41Wtte,:105514r,14, tigtPtt [451501551 55455 s45554554544%15549454 554l goototooto ssss4 tgottog rot .10;4.4* ogitoottpotoot awl fat tooloto pitgt togeof oot tee' SfOolfoff tioor *it :55.5, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 2 1 P g FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Contact! Janine Ellington LAN Engineer111 (713) 821-0264 December 19, 2016 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Meet January 4, 2017 Nueces County will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, January 4, 2017 to gather public input for a EWA,. Action Plan,. or Fan. Plan participants IfliCLIde uninc:orporated Nueces Countythe Cities of .Agua Dulce Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, Petroniia, Fon Aransas, and Robstown, as well as the Pon of Corpus Christi Authority. The meeting iiis from 3:00 -5: p.rn. at Nueces County Cdmmissioners Court Chambers, 901 Leopard, Corpus Christi, TX 79401. The public, area businesses and organizations located throughout the planning area are invited and encouraged to attend.: Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000,, the Federal Emergency Management Agency {FEMA) requites communities to develop a mitigation plan to minimize or eliminate the Olong-term risk to human life and property from known hazards. Mitigation is defined by FEMA as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and properly from hazards and their effects. Hazards that may , a risk and potentially result in a disaster include drought flood, hurricane, tornado, wildfire, and :other high hazards. Communities with a FEMA -approved Plan are elble for certain grant funding under the Hazard Mitigation Assis nce (HMA) program to fund critical projects such as Buyouts and Structural Elevation of repetitive flood loss structures, drainage projects„ and hardening critical facilities to minimize future dam.ite from natural disasters that affect the County planning area. The purpose of the public meeting is to provide a project overview from LAN., consultant to the project, and solicit information from citizens. Public input will help the Planning Team to identifY and analyze potential hazards affecting residents and recommend possible actions to reduce their impact throughout Nueces County and the planning area. Detailed information albout the planning process. can be obtained by contacting Janine Ellington, Project Manager, at (713) ,or jeeltinalonajlan-incicom Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 3IPage FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Janine Ellington LAN lEngineering l713I 821-0264 January 3,2017 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Public A n nouncement & Kickoff January 4, 2017 A public meeting on Wednesday, January 4, 2017 to gather pucic input for a FEMA Mitigation Action Plan, or Pian. The litulti-Jurisdictional Plan participants include unincorporated areas of Nueces County, the Cities of Agua Dulce, Bishop, Corpus Christ, Dnscoli, Petronilla, Port Aransas, and Robstown, as well as the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. The meeting is at 3p.m., at Nueces County Commissioners Court, 901 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX 70491., The public, area businesses and organizations located throughout the planning area are invited and encouraged to attend.. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the Federal lErriergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires communities to develop a mitigation plan to minimize or eliminate the longterm risk to human life and property from known ha.zardls. Mitigation is defined by FEMA as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects,. Hazards that may pose a risk and potentially result in a disaster include drought, flood, hurricane, tornado, wildfire„ and other high nazard8... Communities with a FEMA -approved Plan are eligible for certain grant, 'funding under the Hazard Mitigation Assisr.nce (HMA) program to fund critical projects such as Iluyouts and Structural Elevation of repetitive flood loss, structures, drainage projects, and hardening critical facilities to minimize future damage from natural disasters that affect the County panning area. The puroose of the public meeting is to provide a project overview from LN, consultant to the project, and solicit information from citizens. Public input will help the Planning Team to iii-ntify and analyze potential hazards affecting residents and recommend possible actions to reduce their impact throughout Nueces County and the planning area Detailed information about the panning process can be obtained by c Janine Eilington„ Projlect Manager, at (713) ,,or jedingtor *an-inc.corn tatting Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 41Page Kickoff Planning Meeting Invitation, January 4, 2017 1144 11 tll...,1111111,E"1111"Y tll...111111.1...""11"111......111.1..111'ii1111!;111:111111(.:-111"111 IMA111.1... 111..-111)41A111,iL111)\'c 11"0 111"111"1111:°1.""111"1110 IN E:'"'111.....,,I!'"u:,..111,14 11(111(:1111Cio'::.") 1111111411`111"11"111E Nueces County is sponsoring a Kickoff meeting in conjunction with the development of a Multi -jurisdictional FEMA Mitigation Action Nan, or Mon. Participating project partners forming the core Planning Team include unincorporated Nueces County, the Cities of Agua Dulce, Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, IPetronila, Port Aransas, and Robstown„ as well as the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. The goal of the Plan is to minimize or eliminate the long-term risk to1human life and property from known hazards. Upon FEMA approval of the Plan, Nueces County, and the participating entities listed above will be eligible for certain FEMA Hazard Mitigation, Assistance (HMA.) grant funds to implement cost-effective mitigation projects in their local jurisdiction and Nueces County. LAN Engineering, project consultant, will be facilitating the meeting. Please make every effort to attend this important meeting. Strong leadership from Planning Team Members throughout the planning process is critical; therefore, key department personnel and community officials from both Nueces County and the participating jurisdictions are required to attend workshops, assess hazard risk, create mitigation .strategies, involve the. public, and adopt the local Plan. A public meeting to provide outreach and an overview of the project to the general public will be held on: DATE: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 TIME: 3:00 — 5:00 p.m. LOCATION: Nueces County Commissioners Court Chambers 9,01 Leopard Corpus Christi, TX If you have questions or wall not be able to attend., please contact Janine ElIllington by phone at 71.3s, 821-0264 or by ernaN at nro 1-inc.com or Christopher IBoyce by ennaill at Christopherboycern nuecesco„ tom Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 51Page Kickoff Meeting Sign -In Sheets, January 4, 2017 tot. Coolly 144:410,014d0,41140, 1110241kr6 Pt mon Kir:11,40 Worityhop„ Corittuoi, C J),nrwroury 2117 IE Title AgonePhono y 6 1 , „ y r j tr,1,1;,pr14 r' ,' 14 P'Tga,a,giagoggaggag,i,a,,,pag; /1 j,9 iga":„.?6,1aga Pa:PT rY,1„ ;„,',,4,,e 14l41414 4, ,4 „ 444 r 1P,„4g„,,114;-4 14(e;,;;J;:a, V 14 ilea; a;Ao ) k Jw.4;1111,fils,„.„ tia,kPg.,T;;;;;;,2;;;Tagat, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 61Pag (.2; hushes Cissihni 4144Mistisidististith NC ism 'so Amoral MIMI hisSion meting, Mitiolisim Chrsm, TX PU UC MEETING January 4,, 21)1 1 EurpJ ,4 ,lActot, , )4(44„ eliztc+, coo, , Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 71Page Kickoff Meeting PowerPoint Presentation, January 4, 2017 pU'YrI�11� 9�v�iii�i�N@4�u➢; 4 �u I�v"OO �wu�M M/Or ll,Vey 0 4 Orn *g4444x4w✓ 4 4,w 444'ti4"N4k�1�4 4YW4'm'rar.Yl t�' � „,¢na1 IV rM4 4404 ae;✓4 4W41 'h0 14 NIryPm, �kga14 40forrm4 040000000 re pomp „.. ty4444440 400004 r"r 07000 01400 00040,044, 4* 0 9 Jn 4 44414d4u4�44@ 008/14M,0400 6044 140441"ON,'t44N C4004400* 4004*. Val? rOfM'4",1O402010* 440n4404O14;. O ti( M1G;yf arm,81r ✓ 41 Y1 AP V 4 P gVk4hryw o1/4 ru a 11 z >J r I ;m � 4 i 1✓ U9 H k. r'4 /!lrld✓ow,M 5.,4 I r>r %OW* VAANION. ,O,O,,r,Orrw; M2 mgr, ,r,e,4 Nsrr ti ✓ yr at>ti. 4,44,4 �w.m 11 Mannino .Putpose feerdi4m 440.0W er0000a 4�4W4)440'4g p4,rt. um201:00,r , elerrereorgeo 4000441.4 4,,0444 41 oogooroo Amon 4r'G4ra WII, u0 01,044 M� 41a4>4r r4 f4ro,,,K0 u4 boots itolO rvm property Oar 0 epe bm 0001 .000* 00010,0 000410 IT u*mom th,t004 400040w100;44 A'T44om4U"q, 1100 tu1>''0 4 140011Pre Co4400p 000040440. PEVCodex; 440,044,44 404001m 4,Ia a *****4111,4 04 4 I;), "Air 4w 4014 a 4s a 41440 ¢OAP Y as •,01 1M441I,i 0040044r,0444 ran 1v44r104 0,44 o m,rr 141 4 4e rOoloolo ", I WV, "Igo "Nov bAOUT,O k, 4'I"a4"4'T4 woo** u "Om r !Rr 0.490.0,5 r'No4944,,4 44 voosch 01 4 rew re or* i, or°4 Woo 0,044, 4441444 0,04 4408.41*** 44 C 4*0 44' ,4 00400014010 **44444 14'a7m4**4 M1 w4. 4,4 14iV b4 INA 41447444 9910 Iw4NIV4414,4 r44Om0. ,41110 1r,O44MY41O Ib,µr O"%,4rr; Thom" mof 144 g +awcVrlml tor,r,74"a4" 04"0"0"o, µ4t 4�CxO4 0744444 .14 the 44!440 u.14 44 Orr1* deC***404 44M Epr mr44,4i444 9,m 4 m`u4 4°x4441 *map p44rm4rn4 er mown 4m *ENO 040.0 r 4 *r41hvs4y o 4mti41u✓4i4 410 oroducov 4.4m4.ak 44acVar p mom w°ba4w441rr4Rm`m040,9 M 644'% 44'i4411,;orya'mrW'11'a"4w'1.""r'44'Y'tN^4'°s/ 100044144 14 rr4 , 0144**** P Plamining .40.41400 4140040100, . 114pIp44 WIG0.MA>m au 4 ply° h nn ikatiftiot1a Jr(1m4or4u 444404w r4H` 14'44.4009 4tv414r " 44n au1IW4Ni4. fast✓ 0404 rml 4v:ropy, 04 1 4 1 iC40 N IO0i1414 „ p „ro( ;WO. &NS pr rVe G4 l M4 eer44 u4 Ir, T 4r Cn'4 0440441010 Tau004 44,d 4,445. tiatiatllang 0701014+4 • IL4ID mw'4141 r4 G'Y�644rt744 pn�m WA, to*COO 414 yolortyryhn Hu1ig Inl " I .' ,r , ,r�t,a4 +,r ,r, 0,4,40 oloKINow. ,rf/rt v) X>,A.m a WW1, ✓,FQg f, xirr/9,9,riii/'�M , d•r >s,A n✓ .R(rr / r rc' 47'04 �r4wi44. 4°�Ms4MnrM: +ry romuO4, Motto toreO✓4 Iw'44O, 000094 4,;; 000wrarmlw Welter Weer Ik,e40"`p✓0444 drr444414 1"414,44 40044040, IMPm'4i44t14'. 0000000m yoreto 4 V'4 w, 4',M.yee+po we!d etroo040403400 40 prowl mom. 1445040 A1444O144 r"M 0***0m W4464,1r(mf"4,4 114414ed vela flys toprd pop, to V4M,144r o,„w promo poppc brow 744 cr44 4n 40140,04 4114`mm4mpre re5w' 00 40440000 14440044N4444rea,a4tere er poop, po44 Oslor oleo 40 rperrypop 0000404 poem 4144 4u 44,1 f'w 1044 40400 0000000 tom moll), b40645, orproevy 4tmamrrm4 rdra409 0,4y04c.144", toodpeoriklg Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix C 8 1 IP a "Tioaso me on tom rot toormozo diutrop *V POWS Wel mew pfowoo ot relly Ito knew** elflk llande arid #11140" CereMi. td wetland* noeleasede WOO* r000mrog 0000tabk oNd view.% to oodi,aco mace and pfmcionnito rodoneleadel lelleeelee00 aeol1 l 11 tI 00000led ao woo sokot so - Atiqtkotillm04 .44.4 vA,110 iffttoft IPI/N. WON ol die anonnal ' dew nowedownow node*, */* dowoad do *wool 11 4P* 0,000.4101ell VVA 11,41 eko• rirbog INVA..9),61W(deV,,, fincorrnragew,V, ovfi, nr.,can.,1,M0 t Vitt ttettlt MIP,1010, 'tat, 0,6%,%.! ftet ,t,t1tOtttttft %Mt! % tat OA ppokyo.%%"' %off;' 4,310 ' ir6V, gM14,01500,01 11,0,007,9 1;30 Jfi,I!,,,,AVAY 40000014 vv, Re 'Retbard NNW 0MIMMIIMIVINNIUMOMINVIM f.01 1.0,41,/ .00410. r4.50,41 rootttt 'dorm WY PAW. .1.4,41.00.. Ott arenttetree .WavAlmoOkoomp om Noma. 0.0 MA, HAMA WV` A I tinvatedITOrteMte 4,,,N4114, MAU ttt Art tate )10 . tAtttorto 0, A AA A AAJAAAAAJ „ PAT MAAAAAA0 IVAAAAAAAA 4.0 ktket,,4 t% Attl,00,4 4,,40,94001kit ,11 1 izitication, and Awercness TIN014)111 liNOut11 $1,1 albtrA Old edtdeAte *OW dlalaa nen" Sod eanotallai wind el 1 PIO" EN oonooko owNodi poops f,;m1 mgmebe randeed allennaloon 041,41,f0 dlearalate owner* el hAZVOIOOrri. VEAL, 00,440r9 roO/40014, 011. 11 P1 Avremot1 11 111of toloorote w,,,ogoo atm,1 111 I111 needy P11 11 Aravo 1,94to ermeecre Amer Pmecams 11 AAAAA,,A.A Ro4s,11, resibilliti WWWWWIIIIMMIIWWWWWWWIMIM PIA! 1 gw.:"0,5v rams.:0%azo Pop pgro,4,0 6A4 5.9,999999 "0.4,10,41. otttt%tt Ittttatt% Ott, .Ott, ft to% motottAt. f tat, ttottettit, tttett, rtztt, ttytt Ottet tt,,1 ,ttntettt [N,tvd f pm, 'it, Ott, %OA Trttek Ottott,,,t, . Itty, trfottkt, tut, %,,tilottlttott, %ttt tttrAttt i6(41060644.006M.144000,1tlirn AAAVAAAA :N.leAVOOA Ittealglor6 12.41 -mm. liddlalled Number o n Abeam FAO., APOWAWACA MAW' ago"yzo, A AApAAAAAAAPAAAP Nov,: or w%,,,,,c46r% 0%,%Amoor, %.,ofa,,,,,e ttte ettAtttf, tAttttAttt ttotttrtt,. to, kAAIIRKWAAA4KA RAAAAAAAI frA, AAA AAAVAAAA, .999K. 999 14991990)99999., moat owm, tg tot ottoro, .1104 go.ej • 41U 11999/99,9499.,99 fr ,MPIPM.Pg Of WO a."50,4„0, 699,, 9 999.9999 ,AA Mr, 'IA ONNIANN On kj Pubbe, Owitooth e.rvA4r,,'4,61z4r4 111 1111 '60^4e 114P ootron.y ebo,ro on low' mo; 11 11ri:61d0 irfkosMICO r$4,A Ckmo,14100 Rt* eel* TYWNIUNA 1444dAl gLIV%. AtAg 10!1114ei raor al too NINA tfOt, • p%elea 11",NII1 Amu pit* A 9,1,6oc sande link wevat 14u,10. viong • MoIV 0,14 r4ru P010 11'4, 1444 A Oft tA,444 '114 nolo' oil ovo444444 Next 54 WWWIMMIMMININIMMINIUNIONNWINIVRINVIM NOM 4110 *VA ttittlir; tttt,,,6 tstotttart %%Kt ott, , !tt,toftett t% ONO '9099994. 999,99, 9999,99990919 109,99.99999 999, 999,.99 A,AA, AA., AAA. ,AAA 44,1, %OA to,tottto ,74 ''1110,1111,1V, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 91Page HMAP City Council PowerPoint Presentation ■ MAP Plan Plepttitt trettrtytttyt tot Molt Iyyt.tY,'P++ot AttotttAchtyy Plat ittOt Otto 'it ,a ..t of I'Moe9a' 7r Mae trims to toy wt.. pt./tett ° gd,"tyyytto v1%dttyy,y tot attgatort QC'oItatto�°J littotettito Ito putt: Mourding Arm UrfrhuraMI,V0494 mmycyv tourty,,hootCyst%tt Mrr4W tttstet, Stow, Como.Crop, C! °" wed as M61tPtrttiM`r,,^tJNttut ChttrYttatt.tt g#wwr1i T are. t,wrq ottutt t'att olitt tyttbetttetto Ott Mom t /4k DA0444,114 4' WMW dM11a01tg Ire: ',MW. MCV M gFs t,vct,;aark PALM, 6Y o e,, RL n,wWd Ph > t,Mm'W tet ctekrqb a,W'W " V XiW aNuu1 h"Watom ttot tat Noy ettortm00, **Mon lul 11 prdfaau 1 MMl*+N tlr,'w 0.01 4,9100 Wal wr OPOV F440,4 Po Vvp11 4 ,r11 $ 0,60,4 vfll y uP,w' w e"."4"0"01400 'wed t v 01141, if1 a 6INAu4ly Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 10 1 P a phase CR- HazartlARtait Artol0ta hkattay tittural: Nunn* ha RA* AnolVos P,froa. PGSVIOS trt 09 hatcr,ca ot,tAAMMah% 010000,4 440,001013*, ;IrfablObbtt the katao, 4444 141444044, 4440*rj. 04), 0404044 ard 0144 944044 'No 4rM700016 4)44440.11444,71, Oft 'MN" taka get gum egoogaigo if,gages. Loogb Importing 44 diatonte tweet* hetata011114 tofgtainatbV huord talk fl Strirt kont ggeouggogo Ard10... 71,40,111..10.4. , [441/2/4/446)44/41 04,0, WA, reapapaPPAPPaVI.fr aff, PU., 40941 011.J00041,40,44 ongoing Public Cant ach E00000000 tiazt0100, grogglaga what Igo ,oggnaggt, 1444 doll ,te Mae tmaaa *ad Woode 94thSrr tht 449444 COV,Oraf I9/4,1400 fiatatigt, 44/4144911 pagtg moat** eaelovtilop .944449444441 IhOV 410,4n,,,,41 rpotol galgVtita fljj attolat HUM t I( Ow bog Numb r Ortogat0on 0 008 ,00, 044/ 40.00,0 4060.0. weolv AVA.,;44 papa604,,P /4441 94/4 4'..V 4*/04,0604, cffixe ,Awd 1444 44 powipapp KA/44<, 4 444/ 7/44414/44/4 /94)6944) 7)41 /612Igete/2000.`,4 '/14///441/1)4911/4444444/4$6 V00,1101 '446/6/491..1 *OW., 41/4 4,4450 *lea, asponsiblittlies - -1- - geatitge 4,4)7/P„,,w9 wofle..0 0'0,00+ 44)„11144441, „1/4)4264 We, f. 0001Mr Onw41,,41.7o.,6,7 [,,,VVYAM fAV1/,71, 31,0 9 OM 14 Iota , 01011 NWT, 14104:” 44 4/4/414/44l9 44111/74/444 o 41444/4/44/1444/49194, e9l0*4/4,44 01,1wrio4,0 44444444 Mica 4 f00 4/4494411 VAKegmo 400010 ONIONIPMS011 climatta 00 karma co, owof 9440/44 4Afitte41 PN.tit froily VI4 ir04****6044 40Pia 11/4l447111o44104 ova ,t,oriproy gotott ointiN 6,14: Pima* - tANOthatatatpain OtiOtt 44,,I44e44494/49/4o7/44f 49.0 Ir 44,06, 44144)4' /441 Piorw 144 VV,, 1/946,444104 /,,a4914,00, 4te0 Melhagarh TOM 19/7449 1 00..0 444 e,44'2414/14944 rrf, OM. e,40 14104000 1,06AAV 194/1441 pp, pop, a, PPOPJAPP 1004900 4494/4,',,,iVinV044 radeidaegoff a'f, /NAVA add I44/rpo9M46 OA, %ffAdjn, PO4.,1,014e4 VAig. 01,,0,0 V4..011 owl C *Mad 44/ /9 CI,M• PPOpPe MPP,SPXP• 4414//41414444/444449/i/4// 4/4/4911014 .342 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 11 1 P a g 02! Webinar Meeting, March 3, 2017 Ii1011.001 X1111611���«�0`11Ill,,,,,,,,,�y� ���1��������� 01 gIIIIIIIIIII ILII Danielle Hale Tak Makino Christopher Boyce Janine Ellington Scott Harris Tom Mylett Yvette Dodd Rick Adams Ricardo Gonzalez 1111.' ,,,,,,µyy""MMll;M111ii1 IIImmIIIIIpp uqu`�III ��umuumm �'1'111�IIIII �yll�llll�llll IIIIIIIIII ILII ILII III°������������ PCCA LAN Nueces County LAN LAN PCCA Corpus Christi Port Aransas Robstown Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 12 1 If" a HMAP Natural Hazards Ranking Sheet Pito" ir,:::4101.110ity u 0.),0 rta 00.-Olaz,a orli 004 IHIjatio A et 0 lEin NIHudD 11 a ta rids OF? a 011 r10 S het,A NOTE::: This. is. :not: et techrlical exercise_ Results WiN be compiled end included in the. Risk Assessment: Overview of the Plant. The hazard milking is based on your experience as a, community official or resident of the Nueces County area.: Place a nieskin the appropriate: co/Limn and rcw irditainng level of risk. Consider frequency of occurrence of :each haz.ard welli as :the potential impact When rankihE the haserds. Hazard Not Applicablle tNiA) Low (J Moderate (MI High oil Flloods Hurricane topicall Storm Viiildfire Tornado Drought Coastall Erosion Dam Levee Faure Earthqualkes Etcp,ansVve Soils Eirtreme Heat Hleilstrorm Land Subsidence Severe Winter Storm Windstorms ILlightening Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 13 1 Page Mitigation Action Workshop, March 29, 2017 11,11 001011 1111 mime a uui a uuu a ui[016i uu Ricardo Gonzalez John Montalvo Laura Casset Danielle Hale Christopher Boyce Tak Makino Yvette Dodd Scott Harris Nicole Boyer Janine Ellington Billy Delgado Rick Adams tititir"ti��w11�444tititir���� IW411,�,,,,,1111�»Il��llluuuuuo 1111111 u�i�ui��u�m�o m��m uu a huu' �V ������yyyyyytiploou,,,,,�� p6 Iliulplo i IIIIIIIIV u Robstown LAN LAN PCCA Nueces County LAN Corpus Christi LAN Port Aransas LAN Corpus Christi Port Aransas Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix C 14 1 If" a '1111111@ 11111111 !!i!!llld,�lli!!lill � 1111111111111111111,1,1 , \\SIM AIS 11 NUECES COUNTY CRITICAL FACILITI . Emergency Operation Center(s) NUECES COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 901 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 EMS Station NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 6 City Hall Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTW ON, TEXAS 78380 Hospital(s) NUECES COUNTY HALO FLIGHT 1843 FARM TO MARKET ROAD 665, CORPUS CHRISTI 78411 County Courthouse NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE 901 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 Fire Stations NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 1 BANQUETTE FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #4 BLUNTZER FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #4 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #2/ NC ESD #1 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #3/ NC ESD #1 5241 CO RD 73 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 SH44 AND 2ND ST. BANQUETTE, TEXAS 78339 666 AND FM 624, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS 70380 5242 CR 73, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 3879 CR 61, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Airport BISHOP MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NUECES COUNTY AIRPORT CR 77 AND FM 3354, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 3983 WINGS DR, ROBSTOWN, TX 78380 Community Centers BANQUETTE COMMUNITY CENTER 4359 4TH ST BANQUETTE, TEXAS 78339 Schools LONDON ISD LONDON H 5 LONDON ISD LONDON EL AGUA DULCE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL BISHOP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS DRISCOLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -CAMPUS BANQUETTE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT- SCHOOL CAMPUS 1306 FM 43 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 1306 FM 43 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 1 LONGHORN DR, AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 719 E 6TH ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 410 WEST AVE. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 2391 COUNTY ROAD 47, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 4339 4TH ST BANQUETTE, TEXAS 78339 \\SIM AIS 11 CITY OF AGUA DULCE CRITICAL FACILITIES RASSU‘S Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTWON, TEXAS 78380 Police Station(s) AGUA DULCE CONSTABLE PCT. 5/ COUNTY JUSTICE OF THE PEACE 1514 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 70330 City Hall AGUA DULCE CITY HALL 1514 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 70330 Fire Stations AGUA DULCE FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE 1510 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 Community Centers AGUA DULCE COMMUNITY CENTER 1513 2ND ST. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF AGUA DULCE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Schools AGUA DULCE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL 1 LONGHORN DR. AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78330 County Building CONSTABLE 5 1514 2ND ST AGUA DULCE, TEXAS 78410 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 11Page Police Stations) CITY OF BISHOP CRITICAL FACILITIES BISHOP POLICE DEPARTMENT 115 S. ASH. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 City Hall BISHOP CITY HALL 203 E. MAIN ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Fire Stations BISHOP FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 2015 SOUTH PACIFIC, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Airport BISHOP MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CR 77 AND FM 3354, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Community Centers BISHOP COMMUNITY CENTER 102 W JOYCE ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF BISHOP WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT US HWY 77 Bypass Schools BISHOP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS 719 E. 6TH ST. BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 BISHOP CISD BISHOP EL 200 5 FIR BISHOP, Texas 78343 BISHOP CISD BISHOP H 5 100 BADGER LN BISHOP, Texas 78343 BISHOP CISD BISHOP PRI 705 W MAIN ST BISHOP, Texas 78343 BISHOP CISD LILLION E LUEHRS J H 717 E SIXTH ST BISHOP, Texas 78343 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 21Page Emergency Operation Center(s) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITES Nueces County Emergency Operations Center 901 LEOPARD STREET CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401-3606 Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers Shelter agreements are not for shelter in place; they are used post disaster and can be an area of last refuge if needed. Shelter agreements include the following ISO's: CCISD, Calallen, Tuloso Midway, Flour Bluff and West Oso CALALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 4001 WILDCAT DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 DEL MAR COLLEGE 101 BALDWIN, COLES BUILDING, CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas 78404 TULOSO MIDWAY HIGH SCHOOL 2653 MCKINZIE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULOSO MIDWAY 3125 DEER RUN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 County Building CONSTABLE 2 10110 COMPTON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 MCKINZIE JAIL ANNEX 745 N PADRE ISLAND DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78406 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 611 PALM ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER 1630 BROWNLEE BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI , TX 78404 CITY/COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 1702 HORNE RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78416 MEDICAL EXAMINER 2610 HOSPITAL BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78405 CENTRAL GARAGE 201 CORN PRODUCTS RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78409 Community Center HILLTOP COMMUNITY CENTER 11425 LEOPARD ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 Hospital(s) BAYVIEW BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL, A CAMPUS OF CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL 6629 WOOLRIDGE ROAD CORPUS CHRIST, TEXAS 78414 CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI 2606 HOSPITAL BOULEVARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 784051818 CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI SHORELINE 600 ELIZABETH STREET CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 75038 CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI SOUTH 5950 SARATOGA BOULEVARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 5727 ESPLANADE DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 DRISCOLL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL 3533 SOUTH ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 DUBUIS HOSPITAL OF CORPUS CHRISTI 600 ELIZABETH STREET 3RD FLOOR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 75038. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 31Page Hospital(s) (cont.) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITIES (CONT.) POST ACUTE MEDICAL SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF CORPUS CHRISTI 6226 SARATOGA BOULEVARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414-3421 SOUTH TEXAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL 6130 PARKWAY DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - BAY AREA 7101 SOUTH PADRE ISLAND DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412-4913 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - DOCTORS REGIONAL 3315 SOUTH ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411-1820 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - NORTHWEST 13725 NORTHWEST BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 THE CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER - THE HEART HOSPITAL 7002 WILLIAMS DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412-4912 City Hall CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 1201 LEOPARD STREET CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 Fire Stations FIRE STATION 1 514 BELDEN ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 FIRE STATION 2 13421 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 FIRE STATION 3 1401 MORGAN AVENUE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78404 FIRE STATION 4 2338 RODD FIELD RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78414 FIRE STATION 5 2406 LEOPARD STREET, STE 200 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78408 FIRE STATION 6 6713 WEBER RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413 FIRE STATION 7 3750 S STAPLES ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78411 FIRE STATION 8 4645 KOSTORYZ RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78415 FIRE STATION 9 501 NAVIGATION BLVD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78408 FIRE STATION 10 1550 HORNE RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78416 FIRE STATION 11 910 AIRLINE RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78412 FIRE STATION 12 2120 RAND MORGAN RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 FIRE STATION 13 1802 WALDRON RD. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FIRE STATION 14 5901 S STAPLES ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 41Page Fire Stations (cont.) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITIES (CONT.) FIRE STATION 15 14202 COMMODORE ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FIRE STATION 16 8185 TEXAS 361 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78373 FIRE STATION 17 6869 YORKTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78414 ANNAVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 11551 LEOPARD ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 2 337 YORKTOWN BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78418 Water Treatment Plant O. N. STEVENS WATER FILTRATION PLANT 13014 HEARN RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410-4412 ALLISON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 4001 ALLISON DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 BROADWAY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 1402 W BROADWAY ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 GREENWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 6541 GREENWOOD DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 LAGUNA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 201 JESTER ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469 O50 PLANT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 501 NILE DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 WHITECAP WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 13409 WHITECAP BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA5 78469 Power Generating Stations Barney M. Davis Energy Center 4301 WALDRON RD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 Police Station(s) POLICE STATION 321 JOHN SARTAIN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 CALALLEN POLICE SUBSTAION 1925 TULOSO RD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 Schools CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ADKINS MIDDLE 2402 ENNIS JOSLIN RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA5 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ALLEN EL 1414 18TH ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD BAKER MIDDLE 3445 PECAN CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD BARNES EL 2829 050 PKWY CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 Schools (cont.) CORPUS CHRISTI ISD BROWNE MIDDLE 4301 SCHANEN BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CALK EL 4621 MARIE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 51Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL '"", CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CARROLL H 5 FACILITIES (CONT.) 111, 1. 1 5301 WEBER RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CLUB ESTATES 5222 MERGANSER CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI 15D COLES H SAND EDUCATIONAL CENTER 924 WINNEBAGO CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD COLLEGIATE H S 101 BALDWIN, COLES BUILDING, ROOM 201 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CROCKETT EL 2625 BELTON ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CULLEN MIDDLE 5225 GREELY CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD CUNNINGHAM MIDDLE 4321 PRESCOTT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD DAWSON EL 6821 SANDERS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD DRISCOLL MIDDLE 3501 KENWOOD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT CTR 6300 OCEAN DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD EVANS SES 1315 COMANCHE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD FANNIN EL 2730 GOLLIHAR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD FAME WEBB EL 6953 BOARDWALK CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GALVAN EL 3126 MASTERSON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GARCIA EL 4401 GREENWOOD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GIBSON EL 5723 HAMPSHIRE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD GRANT MIDDLE 4350 AARON DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HAAS MIDDLE 6630 MCARDLE RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HAMLIN MIDDLE 3900 HAMLIN DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HAROLD T BRANCH ACADEMY FOR CAREER & TECHN 3902 MORGAN AVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78405 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HICKS EL 3602 MCARDLE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 61Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL '"", CORPUS CHRISTI ISD HOUSTON EL FACILITIES (CONT.) 111, 1. 1 tililtV 363 NORTON ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD JONES EL 7533 LIPES CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KAFFIE MIDDLE 5922 BROCKHAMPTON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KING H S 5225 GOLLIHAR RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KOLDA EL 3730 RODD FIELD RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 70414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD KOSTORYZ EL 3602 PANAMA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD LOS ENCINOS SES 1826 FRIO CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78417 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MARTIN MIDDLE 3502 GREENWOOD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MARY GRETT SCHOOL 4402 CASTENON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MARY HELEN BERLANGA EL 4120 CARROLL LN CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MEADOWBROOK EL 901 MEADOWBROOK CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MENGER EL 2401 S ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MIRELES EL 7658 CIMARRON CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MONTCLAIR EL 5241 KENTNER CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MOODY H S 1818 TROJAN DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD MOORE EL 6121 DURANT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD OAK PARK SPECIAL EMPHASIS SCHOOL 3801 LEOPARD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD RAY H S 1002 TEXAN TRL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ROY MILLER H 5 AND METRO SCHOOL OF DESIGN 1 BATTLIN BUC BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SANDERS EL 4102 REPUBLIC CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SCHANEN ESTATES EL 5717 KILLARMET CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 71Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL SISIXISS '"", CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SHAW SES FACILITIES (CONT.) 111, 1. 1 IIIIIIV 2920 SOLEDAD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78405 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SMITH EL 6902 WILLIAMS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD SOUTH PARK MIDDLE 3001 MCARDLE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD TRAVIS EL 3210 CHURCHILL DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78415 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD VETERANS MEMORIAL H S 3750 CIMMARRON BLVD CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78414 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD WILSON EL 3925 FT WORTH CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD WINDSOR PARK Gr 4525 S ALAMEDA CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD W OODLAW N EL 1110 W OODLAW N CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD WYNN SEALE METROPOLITAN SCHOOL OF DESIGN 1707 AYERS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD YEAGER EL 5414 TRIPOLI CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78411 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD ZAVALA EL 3125 RUTH CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78405 CORPUS CHRISTI MONTESSORI SCHOOL 822 AYERS ST CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 TULOSO MIDWAY HIGH SCHOOL 2653 MCKINZIE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULOSO MIDWAY MIDDLE SCH 9768 LA BRANCH CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULSO MIDWAY INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 1921 OVERLAND TRAIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 TULOSO MIDWAY PRIMARY SCHOOL 3125 DEER RUN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 CALALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 4001 WILDCAT DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 CALALLEN MIDDLE SCHOOL 4602 CORNETT CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 CALALLEN EAST ELEMENTARY 3709 LOTT AVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 WOOD RIVER ELEMENTARY 15118 DRY CREEK CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 MAGEE ELEMENTARY 4201 CALALLEN DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 81Page Schools (cont.) TY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CRITICAL FACILITIES (CONT.) WEST OSO HIGH SCHOOL 754 I1 litISU FLATO ROAD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78405 WEST OSO JUNIOR HIGH 5202 BEAR LANE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX78405 WEST OSO ELEMENTARY 1526 CLIGG MAUS DR CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78416 JOHN F. KENNEDY ELEMENTARY 1102 VILLARREAL CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 76416 FLOUR BLUFF HIGH SCHOOL 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF JUNIOR HIGH 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF INTERMEDIATE 377 HUSTLIN HORNET CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF ELEMENTARY 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF PRIMARY 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 FLOUR BLUFF EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER 2505 WALDRON RD CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78418 1 mitt Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers CITY OF DRISCOLL CRITICAL FACILITIES 1 ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTWON, TEXAS 78380 Police Station(s) DRISCOLL POLICE DEPARTMENT 210 W. MAIN ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 City Hall DRISCOLL CITY HALL 210 W. MAIN ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Fire Stations DRISCOLL FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 322 MAIN ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Airport BISHOP MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CR 77 AND FM 3354, BISHOP, TEXAS 78343 Community Centers DRISCOLL COMMUNITY CENTER 200 E. 7TH ST. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF DRISCOLL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT County RD 79 Schools DRISCOLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -SCHOOL CAMPUS 410 WEST AVE. DRISCOLL, TEXAS 78351 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 91Page Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 10 1Page CITY OF PORT ARANSAS III CRITICAL FACILITIES Fire Stations NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 1 5241 CO RD 73 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF PORT ARANSAS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Schools PORT ARANSAS ISD BRUNDRETT MIDDLE 100 STA ST PORT ARANSAS, Texas 78373 PORT ARANSAS ISD OLSEN EL 100 STA ST PORT ARANSAS, Texas 78373 PORT ARANSAS I5D PORT ARANSAS H 5 100 STATION ST PORT ARANSAS, Texas 78373 County Building CONSTABLE 4 705 WEST AVE A PORT ARANSAS 78373 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 10 1Page Fire Stations CITY OF PETRONILA CRITICAL FACILITIES SIIISSIS 11111%%1M PETRONILA FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 aSSIV FM 665 AND CR 22, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Schools BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -CAMPUS 2391 COUNTY ROAD 47, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 11 1 IP a ge CITY OF ROBSTOWN CRITICAL FACILITES Emergency Operation Center(s) ROBSTOWN EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 430 EAST MAN AVENUE ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 - 3354 Designated Shelters / Evacuation Centers ROBSTOWN RICHARD M. BORCHARD REGIONAL FAIRGROUNDS 1213 TERRY SHAMSIE BLVD. ROBSTWON, TEXAS 78380 Fire Stations NUECES COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 1 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #2/ NC ESD #1 ANNAVILLE FIRE STATION #3/ NC ESD #1 5241 CO RD 73 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 5242 CR 73, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 3879 CR 61, ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Water Treatment Plant NUECES CO WATER DIST #3 Wastewater Treatment Plant ROBSTOWN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT US HWY 77 N BUS (RBST) Community Center ROBSTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER 415 MAINER RD ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Library KEACH FAMILY LIBRARY 1000 TERRY SHAMSIE BOULEVARD ROBSTOWN, TX 78380 County Building CONSTABLE 5 710 E MAIN ST ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ANIMAL CONTROL 4540 FM 392 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 73300 COMMUNITY SERVICES/KITCHEN 415 MAINER RD ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 SOCIAL SERVICES 103 N 6TH ST ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Schools ROBSTOWN ISD HATTIE MARTIN EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER 701 N FIRST ST ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD LOTSPEICH EL 1000 RUBEN CHAVEZ RD ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN 15D ROBERT DRISCOLLJR EL 122 W AVE H ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 70300 ROBSTOWN 15D ROBSTOWN H 5 609 HWY 44 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 70330 ROBSTOWN ISD SALAZAR CROSSROADS ACADEMY 400 W LIGUSTRUM ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD SAN PEDRO EL 800 W AVE D ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD SEALE J H 401 E AVE G ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 ROBSTOWN ISD SOLOMON P ORTIZ INT 208 E AVE H ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 Fire Stations CITY OF PETRONILA CRITICAL FACILITIES SIIISSIS 11111%%1M PETRONILA FIRE STATION/ NC EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT #3 aSSIV FM 665 AND CR 22, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Schools BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -CAMPUS 2391 COUNTY ROAD 47, PETRONILA, TEXAS 78380 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 11 1 IP a ge Emergency Operation Center(s) PORT PORT OF CORPUS OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY CRITICAL CHRISTI AUTHORITY EOC FACILITES 1002 E. PORT AVE., CORPUS CHRISTI TX Police Stations WILLIAM D. DODGE III SECURITY COMMAND CENTER 1002 E. PORT AVE., CORPUS CHRISTI TX Fire Stations REFINERY TERMINAL FIRE COMPANY 1001 MC BRIDE LANE, CORPUS CHRISTI TX78407 Power Generating Stations NUECES BAY ENERGY CENTER NAVIGATION BLVD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78402 Convention Center/Cruise Terminal CONGRESSMAN SOLOMON P. ORTIZ INTERNATIONAL CENTER 402 HARBOR DR., CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 Marine Traffic HARBOR MASTER'S OFFICE 1305 N. SHORELINE BLVD., CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 Administration RUBEN BONILLA CENTER FOR GLOBAL TRADE 222 POWER ST., CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 Power Generating Stations NUECES BAY ENERGY CENTER NAVIGATION BLVD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78402 Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix D 12 1Page 111111111' PP /t i v 11 Mt% M,P 1/13/2005 5.00 1/17/2005 3.00 1/23/2005 5.00 12/31/2005 0.06 1/1/2006 10.00 1/2/2006 0.06 1/3/2006 0.06 1/5/2006 1.00 1/6/2006 1.00 1/6/2006 1.50 1/16/2006 72.00 1/17/2006 5.00 1/20/2006 10.00 1/24/2006 2.00 1/27/2006 0.50 2/5/2006 70.00 lljJ �l n Illil �111111�IIII�II1 Unsafe burning of household trash Unsafe burning of household trash Brush pile burning Unknown Cause Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Right-of-ways; utility co.'s and highways Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Spite Oil field equipment (pump jacks, faulty electric lines, etc.) 2/7/2006 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/8/2006 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/10/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 2/10/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 2/13/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 2/15/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/16/2006 1.00 Origin traceable to trains 2/17/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/20/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 3/6/2006 3.00 Unknown Cause 3/8/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause 3/9/2006 0.25 Unknown Cause 3/9/2006 0.06 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 1 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 3/10/2006 0.06 3/12/2006 5.00 3/13/2006 2.00 3/18/2006 200.00 3/19/2006 0.06 3/21/2006 0.00 3/21/2006 1.00 3/28/2006 1.00 3/31/2006 1.00 4/4/2006 2.00 4/8/2006 1.00 4/10/2006 3.00 4/13/2006 2.00 4/16/2006 1.00 4/19/2006 1.00 4/21/2006 0.50 4/26/2006 0.50 4/28/2006 1.00 5/1/2006 0.50 5/3/2006 1.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Warming or cooking Brush pile burning Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Power Lines Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Construction debris (boards, panels, cardboard, etc.) Unknown Cause Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) Burning leaves and garden spots 5/16/2006 0.10 Unknown Cause 5/19/2006 3.00 Unknown Cause 5/21/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause 5/21/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause 5/22/2006 1.00 Unknown Cause 5/25/2006 1.00 Amusement 6/8/2006 0.50 Power Lines 6/13/2006 1.00 Playing with matches 6/16/2006 0.05 Unknown Cause 6/16/2006 60.00 Unknown Cause 6/28/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 2 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 7/6/2006 1.00 7/14/2006 0.50 7/16/2006 40.00 7/22/2006 0.50 7/31/2006 0.10 8/6/2006 0.50 8/16/2006 0.50 8/21/2006 0.00 • AV\V\ Power Lines Unknown Cause Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Power Lines 8/31/2006 0.00 Unknown Cause 9/5/2006 15.00 Unknown Cause 10/8/2006 0.50 Unknown Cause 12/30/2006 50.00 Unknown Cause 1/1/2007 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/25/2007 1.00 Unknown Cause 3/24/2007 2.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 4/13/2007 3.00 Power Lines 5/3/2007 1.00 Power Lines 5/4/2007 1.00 Playing with matches 5/7/2007 2.00 Unknown Cause 6/10/2007 50.00 Unknown Cause 12/26/2007 100.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 12/29/2007 800.00 Fireworks 12/31/2007 200.00 Fireworks 1/1/2008 5.00 Fireworks 1/1/2008 10.00 Fireworks 1/1/2008 40.00 Fireworks 1/2/2008 30.00 Fireworks 1/3/2008 400.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 1/3/2008 6.00 Fireworks 1/9/2008 1.00 Power Lines 1/10/2008 2.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 3 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t • AV\V\ 1/11/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/13/2008 2.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 1/15/2008 1.00 Warming or cooking 1/30/2008 5.00 Unknown Cause 2/1/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause Prescribed burning (forest brush control/hazard reduction, grassland brush control) 2/6/2008 3000.00 2/6/2008 5.00 Unknown Cause 2/6/2008 2.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 2/7/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 2/7/2008 2.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 2/10/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/14/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 2/22/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/23/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/23/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 2/26/2008 100.00 Unknown Cause 2/26/2008 5.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 2/26/2008 20.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 2/27/2008 100.00 Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. 2/28/2008 5.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 2/29/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 3/1/2008 1.00 Power Lines 3/5/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 3/16/2008 2.00 Power Lines 3/19/2008 5.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 3/21/2008 100.00 Unknown Cause 3/26/2008 1.00 Power Lines 4/15/2008 3.00 Brush pile burning 5/8/2008 1.00 Power Lines 5/27/2008 4.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 4 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t • AV\V\ 5/30/2008 5.00 Unknown Cause 6/6/2008 20.00 Power Lines 6/9/2008 2.00 Power Lines 6/10/2008 1.00 Unknown Cause 6/27/2008 30.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 7/21/2008 50.00 Power Lines 8/15/2008 2.00 Unknown Cause 9/2/2008 0.25 Unknown Cause 9/19/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 9/24/2008 2.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 10/5/2008 1.00 Origin traceable to lightning 11/5/2008 2.00 Playing with matches 11/5/2008 2.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 11/24/2008 1.00 Origin traceable to smoking 11/24/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 11/28/2008 10.00 Origin traceable to smoking 12/4/2008 25.00 Warming or cooking 12/6/2008 0.50 Unknown Cause 12/13/2008 1000.00 Unknown Cause 12/28/2008 1.00 Fireworks 12/28/2008 1.00 Fireworks 12/29/2008 1.00 Fireworks 12/30/2008 3.00 Unknown Cause 1/1/2009 0.50 Fireworks 1/1/2009 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/2/2009 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/3/2009 0.50 Origin traceable to smoking 1/7/2009 2.00 Unknown Cause 1/10/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/10/2009 1.00 Origin traceable to smoking 1/10/2009 0.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 5 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 1/12/2009 0.00 1/15/2009 1.00 1/15/2009 1.00 1/18/2009 0.25 1/19/2009 2.00 1/20/2009 3.00 1/21/2009 0.25 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Origin traceable to smoking Unsafe burning of household trash Construction debris (boards, panels, cardboard, etc.) 1/24/2009 1000.00 Unknown Cause 1/25/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/25/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause 1/27/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/29/2009 0.50 Origin traceable to smoking 1/29/2009 1.00 Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. 2/3/2009 100.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 2/3/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause 2/3/2009 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/5/2009 5.00 Origin traceable to smoking 2/6/2009 0.50 Origin traceable to smoking 2/9/2009 70.00 Unknown Cause 2/9/2009 50.00 Unknown Cause 2/11/2009 1.00 Power Lines 2/11/2009 1.00 Power Lines 2/11/2009 1.00 Origin traceable to smoking 2/20/2009 0.50 Warming or cooking 2/20/2009 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 3/1/2009 0.25 Unknown Cause 3/1/2009 0.25 Bush hogs, lawn mowers, weed eaters, etc. 3/1/2009 2.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 3/1/2009 60.00 Brush pile burning 3/2/2009 0.25 Origin traceable to smoking 3/3/2009 3.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 6 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 3/7/2009 0.30 3/9/2009 1.00 3/18/2009 1.00 3/21/2009 1.00 3/21/2009 5.00 3/26/2009 20.00 3/29/2009 1.00 4/1/2009 1.00 4/2/2009 40.00 4/2/2009 40.00 4/3/2009 1.00 4/3/2009 20.00 4/18/2009 3.00 • AV\V\ Origin traceable to smoking Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Playing with matches Playing with matches Playing with matches Power Lines Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Power Lines Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 4/20/2009 3.00 Unknown Cause 4/22/2009 15.00 Unknown Cause 4/26/2009 7.00 Unknown Cause 4/28/2009 5.00 Unknown Cause 4/29/2009 0.50 Power Lines 5/3/2009 26.00 Playing with matches 5/15/2009 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 5/15/2009 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 5/15/2009 7.00 Unknown Cause 5/15/2009 5.00 Unknown Cause 5/25/2009 0.50 Playing with matches 5/29/2009 0.50 Power Lines 6/28/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 6/30/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause 7/4/2009 2.00 Unknown Cause 7/16/2009 0.50 Burning leaves and garden spots 7/21/2009 100.00 Playing with matches 8/4/2009 0.50 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 7 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 8/8/2009 2.00 8/18/2009 1.00 8/24/2009 1.00 8/30/2009 1.00 9/18/2009 0.50 9/18/2009 0.50 10/16/2009 1.00 10/17/2009 0.50 10/18/2009 0.50 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Origin traceable to lightning Playing with matches Playing with matches Power Lines Playing with matches Power Lines 10/31/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 11/5/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 11/13/2009 1.00 Unknown Cause 11/14/2009 5.00 Unknown Cause 12/23/2009 3.00 Playing with matches 1/1/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/8/2010 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/9/2010 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/17/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/19/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/19/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/20/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 2/12/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 2/15/2010 1.00 Playing with matches 3/7/2010 1.00 Playing with matches 3/9/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 3/14/2010 0.00 Unknown Cause 3/17/2010 1.00 Playing with matches 3/23/2010 2.00 Unknown Cause 3/28/2010 0.50 Playing with matches 3/30/2010 0.20 Unknown Cause 4/7/2010 0.10 Warming or cooking Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 8 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 4/22/2010 1.00 4/26/2010 0.00 4/26/2010 0.00 5/5/2010 0.50 5/9/2010 0.50 5/10/2010 0.00 5/10/2010 0.00 5/10/2010 0.00 5/10/2010 0.00 5/12/2010 0.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause 5/12/2010 0.00 Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) 6/5/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 6/16/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 6/16/2010 0.50 Power Lines 7/4/2010 0.10 Fireworks 7/12/2010 0.10 Brush pile burning 7/17/2010 0.10 Power Lines 7/18/2010 1.00 Power Lines 8/8/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 8/21/2010 0.50 Unknown Cause 10/16/2010 1.00 Power Lines 10/22/2010 2.00 Power Lines 10/29/2010 0.50 Power Lines 10/29/2010 0.50 Trash dumps 12/11/2010 75.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 12/31/2010 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks 1/1/2011 1.00 Fireworks Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 9 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 1/1/2011 0.00 1/1/2011 0.00 2/8/2011 1.00 2/12/2011 15.00 2/12/2011 0.00 2/13/2011 2.00 2/13/2011 3.00 2/13/2011 0.00 2/16/2011 1.00 2/17/2011 0.00 2/19/2011 0.00 3/10/2011 0.00 3/10/2011 0.00 3/12/2011 3.00 3/19/2011 0.00 3/19/2011 1.00 4/5/2011 2.00 4/5/2011 0.00 4/11/2011 0.00 4/28/2011 0.50 4/29/2011 0.50 4/29/2011 0.50 4/30/2011 2.00 5/3/2011 0.50 5/3/2011 25.00 5/3/2011 1.00 5/4/2011 0.00 5/5/2011 2.00 5/19/2011 1.00 6/3/2011 0.00 6/4/2011 3.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Playing with matches Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 10 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 6/6/2011 0.00 6/14/2011 4.00 6/15/2011 1.00 6/26/2011 0.00 6/27/2011 8.00 6/29/2011 1.00 6/29/2011 0.00 6/29/2011 0.00 6/29/2011 500.00 • AV\V\ Unknown Cause Trash dumps Trash dumps Unknown Cause Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Cause Cause Cause Cause 6/29/2011 500.00 Origin traceable to smoking 7/3/2011 0.50 Unknown Cause 7/7/2011 50.00 Unknown Cause 7/7/2011 0.25 Unknown Cause 7/9/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause 7/9/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause 7/11/2011 0.25 Unknown Cause 7/11/2011 3.00 Welding equipment use (fence -building, equipment modification, etc.) 7/12/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause 7/16/2011 0.25 Unknown Cause 7/24/2011 100.00 Unknown Cause 7/29/2011 4.00 Unknown Cause 8/2/2011 2.00 Unknown Cause 8/5/2011 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/8/2011 2.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/11/2011 12.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/12/2011 2.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/15/2011 5.00 Pasture and field burning (including grass, crop residues) 8/16/2011 40.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 8/17/2011 6.00 Unsafe burning of household trash 8/19/2011 2.00 Unknown Cause 8/19/2011 0.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan - Appendix E 11 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 8/20/2011 0.00 8/21/2011 7.00 8/21/2011 1.00 8/21/2011 0.50 8/22/2011 0.50 8/23/2011 5.00 8/29/2011 0.25 9/3/2011 0.00 9/3/2011 4.00 9/4/2011 2.00 9/4/2011 2.00 9/5/2011 0.00 9/8/2011 1.00 9/8/2011 2.00 9/9/2011 0.50 9/13/2011 2.00 9/26/2011 2.00 10/5/2011 1000.00 10/15/2011 5.00 10/16/2011 5.00 11/4/2011 Unspecified • AV\V\ Unsafe burning of household trash Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Farm equipment (hay balers, tractors, etc.) Unsafe burning of household trash Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Trash dumps Trash dumps Trash dumps Construction debris (boards, panels, cardboard, etc.) Unsafe burning of household trash Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Origin traceable to smoking Origin traceable to smoking Unknown Cause Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) Unspecified 1/1/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/3/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 1/16/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 2/2/2012 0.00 Unknown Cause 3/28/2012 1000.00 Origin traceable to smoking 7/18/2012 5.00 Unknown Cause 7/31/2012 15.00 Unknown Cause 8/26/2012 0.25 Unknown Cause 9/3/2012 10.00 Brush pile burning 9/3/2012 10.00 Unknown Cause Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 12 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t 9/10/2012 2.00 9/12/2012 2.00 9/13/2012 10.00 10/12/2012 5.00 10/26/2012 2.00 11/20/2012 1.00 • AV\V\ Power Lines Playing with matches Unknown Cause Unknown Cause Power Lines Power Lines 11/24/2012 1.00 Playing with matches 12/20/2012 40.00 Unknown Cause 2/13/2013 0.25 Unknown Cause 2/25/2013 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/25/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 2/27/2013 0.50 Unsafe burning of household trash 3/4/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/11/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/12/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/24/2013 0.10 Unknown Cause 3/25/2013 Unspecified High winds downed power lines 8/5/2013 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/17/2013 0.25 Unknown Cause 8/23/2013 0.25 Unknown Cause 12/14/2013 800.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 1/15/2014 7.00 Unknown Cause 1/28/2014 0.25 Unknown Cause 2/14/2014 1.00 Unknown Cause 2/14/2014 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/15/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 1/21/2015 0.20 Warming or cooking 2/19/2015 1.00 Playing with matches 2/21/2015 0.10 Warming or cooking 6/15/2015 0.15 Unknown Cause 7/4/2015 1.00 Fireworks Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 13 1 If" a 1,%‘. \\\.t • AV\V\ 7/12/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/3/2015 1.00 Vehicles (catalytic converters, faulty mufflers, dragging metal) 8/9/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/15/2015 1.00 Unknown Cause 8/30/2015 0.20 Brush pile burning 8/30/2015 0.50 Unknown Cause 9/12/2015 0.20 Power Lines 10/1/2015 1.00 Brush pile burning 11/9/2015 0.10 Unknown Cause 11/21/2015 2.00 Warming or cooking *Fire data is reported by fire departments. Wildfires of unknown origin may have initially been reported as "Unknown Cause" or "Unknown Cause." They have been recoded to "unknown cause." Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix E 14 1 If" a ifmllll i 91d 0 111111111111111111111 j trr a1111 111111 mu 1 111111 111111 III, Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix F 1 1 If" a I v uuij1111ui 1111� 110 Nueces County MAP Meetings and Public Involvement Activities Date Event Comments Plan Evaluation Checklist Goal/Objective Address Current Needs? Yes No Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, in jury, damage to property, the economy, and natural systems • Objective 1.1: Protect the life, health and safety of residents • Objective 1.2: Protect existing/new critical facilities and infrastructure • Objective 1.3: Provide protection for future/existing developments • Objective 1.4: Provide backup power to critical facilities/infrastructure • Objective 1.5: Minimize impacts from all hazards Goal 2: Maintain and enhance emergency management/mitigation capabilities • Objective 2.1: Update/develop plans, studies, and mapping for all hazards • Objective 2.2: Incorporate/improve hazard mitigation strategies into ordinances, plans and policies • Objective 2.3: Conduct/develop drills/training for all hazards • Objective 2.4: Implement and maintain the Nueces County Multi - Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan • Objective 2.5: Participate in programs that promote hazard mitigation strategies • Objective 2.6: Build, obtain, and maintain critical facilities and equipment Goal 3: Maintain public education and awareness activities • Objective 3.1: Expand public outreach campaigns for all hazards • Objective 3.2: Promote disaster preparedness planning for families Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 2 1 IP a Planning Considerations Address Current Needs? Yes No Has the nature or magnitude of the risks identified in the plan changed? If yes, comment below. Are the resources adequate for implementing the plan? If no, comment below Have there been any implementation problems such as technical, political, legal or coordination issues with other agencies for the mitigation actions identified? If yes, reference action by selecting "Delayed" on the Project Implementation worksheet with a comment describing issue in implementation Should personnel/agency changes be made to the Galveston County Multi - Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Committee? If yes, complete the mitigation planning team worksheet. Have there been changes to the participating communities' capabilities that improve or impair the progress of the mitigation strategies identified in the plan? If yes, please comment below. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 3 I If" a Mitigation Planning Team Worksheet Use this worksheet to identify partner organizations to invite to participate on the planning team. Some organizations do not need to be involved in every decision of the planning process but are stakeholders that require outreach and involvement during the planning process. Revise the list of general partners below to reflect the organizations in your community. Mark which organizations will be invited to participate on the planning team and which will be involved through stakeholder outreach activities. Planning Team — The core group responsible for making decisions, guiding the panning process, and agreeing upon the final contents of the plan. Stakeholders — Individuals or groups that affect or can be affected by a mitigation action or policy. Partner Organizations Local Agencies Planning Team Stakeholder Notes Building Code Enforcement City Management/County Administration Emergency Management Fire Department/District Floodplain Administration Geographic Information Systems Parks and Recreation Planning/Community Development Public Works Stormwater Management Transportation (Roads and Bridges) City Council/Board of Commissioners Planning Commission Planning/Community Development Regional/Metropolitan Planning Organization(s) City/County Attorney's Office Economic Development Agency Local Emergency Planning Committee Police/Sherriff's Department Sanitation Department Tax Assessor's Office Special Districts and Authorities Airport, Seaport Authorities Fire Control District Flood Control District School District(s) Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 4 1 lP a S Transit Authority Utility District Partner Organizations I Planning Team I Stakeholder I Notes Non -Governmental Organizations American Red Cross Chamber of Commerce Community/Faith-Based Organizations Environmental Organizations Homeowners Associations Neighborhood/Community Organizations Utility Companies State Agencies State Emergency Management Agency State Dam Safety State Department of Transportation State Fire and Forestry Agency State Geological Survey State Water Resources Agency State National Flood Insurance Program Coordinator State Planning Office Federal Agencies Federal Emergency Management Agency Land Management Agencies (USFS/NPS/BLM) National Weather Service US Army Corps of Engineers US Department of Housing and Urban Development US Department of Transportation US Environmental Protection Agency US Geological Survey Other Tribal Officials Colleges/Universities Land Developers and Real Estate Agencies Major Employers and Businesses Professional Associations Neighboring Jurisdictions Note: Multi -jurisdictional planning teams require at least one representative for each participating jurisdiction. This worksheet can be used by each jurisdiction to identify their local sub -team. Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G 5 1 P ,n S Mitigation Action Implementation Worksheet 6 a, f6 0 Jurisdiction Name: Comment Completion Date Completed No Longer Required * 13 w f6 GJ 0 In Progress Reference Mitigation Action Number Nueces County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan — Appendix G Headquarters 2925 Briarpark Drive Suite 400 Houston, TX 77042 713.266.6900 Into@Ian-iinc.com Texas Austin College Station Corpus Christi Dallas Fort Worth Houston San Antonio San Marcos Waco an nc.c Arizona Phoenix California Los Angeles Milpitas Orange Sacramento Florida Miami Tampa Bay Illinois Chicago Michigan Flint Lansing r rr ll / l/l, 11 � r ) i � ll1 11111111 r. , t r , AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 26, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Executive Director of Utilities DanG(cr�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services — Purchasing Division Kim B2(cr�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Chemkeys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant CAPTION: Resolution finding that the purchase of chemkeys and reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with Hach Company of Loveland, Colorado, for the purchase of chemkeys and reagents for a total amount not to exceed $825,780.23 for a three-year term, with an annual step price increase PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to appropriate funds to execute a contract with Hach Company for chemkeys and reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant has a large number of HACH online instrumentation for the plant and water quality. HACH chemkeys, reagents and other consumables are used to test and maintain the quality and safety of our drinking water. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Contract will increase annually through the three-year term of the contract as follows: Year 1: $269,675.25 Year 2: $277,285.81 Year 3: $278,819.17 $825,780.23 Total Contract Value CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department - Water FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $0 $825,780.23 $825,780.23 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $0 $825,780.23 $825,780.23 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 Fund(s): Water Comments: Annual funding will be requested during each of the budget years by the Water departments. The cost in FY2017-18 will be $269,675.25 to be funded from the Water Fund. The contract term is for three years for a total amount not to exceed $825,780.23. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Supply Agreement Resolution Price Sheet Resolution finding that the purchase of chemkeys and reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with Hach Company of Loveland, Colorado, for the purchase of chemkeys and reagents for a total amount not to exceed $825,780.23 for a three-year term, with an annual step price increase. WHEREAS, the chemkeys and reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant will be purchased for use by the Water Department; WHEREAS, these chemkeys and reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant will be used to test and maintain the quality and safety of our drinking water for our citizens; WHEREAS, State law provides that such procurements, as outlined above, are subject to statutory procurement requirements, including competitive bids, unless an exception applies; WHEREAS, there is also a statutory exception for this procurement in Local Government Code, Section 252.022(a) (7) (A), as this purchase is available from only one source due to special processes or patents. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: Section 1. The City Council specifically finds that the foregoing statements included in the preamble of this resolution are true and correct and adopts such findings for all intents and purposes related to the authorization of this procurement. Section 2. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute a supply agreement for Chem keys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant from Hach Company of Loveland, Colorado, based on a sole source for a total amount not to exceed $825,780.23. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Mayor City Secretary Corpus Christi, Texas day of , 20 Page 1 of 2 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Mayor Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey -Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Page 2 of 2 PRICE SHEET CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CHEMKEYS AND REAGENTS FOR O.N. STEVENS WATER TREATMENT PLANT PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: MICHAEL GUTIERREZ Hach Company Loveland, Colorado UNIT PRICE' YEAR ENDED TOTALI UNIT PRICE' EX ENDED TOTALI UNIT PRICE' EX ENDED TOTAL $22,981.20 $45,936.00 O CO 0 N-. V Lo 64 $64,268.16 CO CO a0 co O (fl $2,867.04 N I,- N 00 (0 (fl (0 I,- O 0) 0) (fl CO V co CO V (fl V CO V CO LD (fl $26,405.64 O O) a0 (0 CO 64 $4,729.75 $3,870.72 N 0) r V N N 64 $7,456.32 V O r N O (fl $17.41 O Ln (h 64 64 $47.80 (0 CO O co H} CO I,- (h N 64 0) O $24.84 $55.47 $22.56 $32.73 $53.67 $186.89 $4,729.75 $17.92 $98.37 $34.52 (.0 V O O ffl $23,562.00 $45,936.00 CO 0 N-. Lo 64 $64,268.16 0)) Ln c') O (fl $2,867.04 $2,683.80 � O 0) 0) (fl CO 0 CO V (fl NV 0) L(i CO LC) (fl $26,405.64 00)V co (0 00(0 (fl $4,741.35 O ID 64 O 0 V O N 64O N N.: CO O (fl $4,742.40 CO0 rV (fl 00 (fl $47.80 CO0 (00 (fl I,- 0 N (fl 0) 0 (fl CO N (fl $55.47 $22.56 $32.74 $53.67 $186.89 $4,741.35 0) 69-69-69-= CO 00)) I CO CO 0) 64 $22,308.00 $44,594.88 (.0 a0 O 00 O 64 V a0 CO N $6,831.68 LCO N C6 CO I,- N f!) 0)0 V O 0 N ffl a0O (0 CO Lo ffl $2,365.20 $3,432.24 0 CO CO Ln 64 00 V = CO f!) $4,610.79 V O ID (0 (h ffl O 0 V O O 64 N N.: CO O f!) $4,742.40 O 0) 0 (fl $42.23 $46.41 CO O oi In (fl $23.08 $19.33 $24.12 $53.86 O 0) N (fl $31.78 = In (fl ID co 64 $4,610.79 O 0) 0 H) 00 0) ffl 0 LD (`( ) ffl Q = 64 ITEM I DESCRIPTION 1 QTY. 1 UNIT CO In CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W CO W Water Quality SIRR CO W CO W CO W CO W 1320 1056 1056 1056 N 144 108 108 108 108 V = N 216 N N ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, total chlorine ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, mono- chloromine ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, free ammonia ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, total ammonia APA Acidic Surfactant Wash, 1L Std 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L Std 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L Rgt 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L Rgt 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L Rgt 3, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L aa Total Chlorine Reagent Set, DPD (includes indicator and buffer. For Rapid Liquid Method, CL17 Process Analyzer, and bulk analytical methods) KTO: 5500SC Ammonia Monochloramine Reagent Set Estimated freight charge ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, total chlorine KTO CHEMKEY, 25 piece mono -chlor. and 25 piece free ammonia ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, nitrite O Q N o O Q O O O Q J E In N N C O L 0 To 0 I- 0 0 0 N— Nch 4 LC) 0r0OO N— N - N- N- N- N-N- SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 1342 Chemkeys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant THIS Chemkeys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Supply Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and Hach Company ("Supplier"), effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Supplier has bid to provide Chemkeys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant in response to Request for Bid No. N/A ("RFB"), which RFB includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB and the Supplier's bid response are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Supplier agree as follows: Scope. Supplier will provide Chemkeys and Reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. "Goods," "products", and "supplies", as used in this Agreement, refer to and have the same meaning. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 36 months. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to zero additional zero -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Supplier and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $825,780.23, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Page 1 of 7 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Diana Zertuche Garza Utilities Department Phone: 361-826-1827 Email: DianaG@cctexas.com 5. Insurance. Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Supplier must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of products to be provided by the Supplier over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Supplier a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and products will remain with the Supplier until such time as the products are delivered and accepted by the City. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any products that are delivered but not accepted by the City must be corrected or replaced immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or replacement at no charge cannot be made by the Supplier, a replacement product may be bought by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid price, must be paid by the Supplier within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Supplier warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Supplier warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free Page 2 of 7 of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Supplier or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Supplier will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such products in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Supplier be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Supplier may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Supplier must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid. In using subcontractors, the Supplier is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Supplier. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Supplier and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. Page 3 of 7 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Supplier covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Diana Zertuche Garza Contract Administrator 13101 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, Texas 78410 Fax: 361-826-4488 IF TO SUPPLIER: Hach Company Attn: Alejandro Varela Regional Sales Manager P. O. Box 608, Loveland, Colorado 80539 Fax: 970-669-2932 17. SUPPLIER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, Page 4 of 7 BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. SUPPLIER MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF SUPPLIER UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. SUPPLIER'S AGGREGATE LIABILITY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION PAYABLE TO SUPPLIER DURING THE TERM HEREOF. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL SUPPLIER BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITITVE DAMAGES. LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY SHALL NOT APPLY WHERE LIABILITY CANNOT BE EXCLUDED OR RESTRICTED BY STATUTORY LAW, OR WHERE DAMAGES HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Supplier's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Supplier written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Supplier has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Supplier. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Supplier for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Supplier, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Page 5 of 7 Agreement by the Supplier is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Supplier's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Supplier agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) Page 6 of 7 SUPPLIER Signature: ik \-- Printed Name: tAtt/ Cpycki„,,6„-„, Title: Date: .„.),(1,),- , CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1': RFB No. N/A Exhibit 2: Supplier's Bid Response Page 7 of 7 Attachment A: Scope of Work . General Requirements The Contractor will provide the following products: Line Part Number Descrnptton Qty 1 9429100 ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, total chlorine 1320 2 9429400 ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, mono- chloromine 1056 3 9429500 ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece free ammonia 1056 4 9425200 ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, total ammonia 1056 5 2876453 APA Acidic Surfactant Wash, 1L 296 6 2776653 Std 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 144 7 2776753 Std 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 8 2776353 Rgt 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 9 2776453 Rgt 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 10 2776553 Rgt 3, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 11 2557000 as Total Chlorine Reagent Set, DPD (includes indicator and buffer. For Rapid Liquid Method, CL17 Process Analyzer, and bulk analytical methods) 492 12 25233000 KTO: 5500SC Ammonia Monochloramine Reagent Set 10 13 27 Estimated freight charge 1 Water Quality SIRR 14 9429100 ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, total chlorine 216 15 9429600 KTO CHEMKEY, 25 piece mono -chlor. and 25 piece free ammonia 216 16 9429300 ASSY., Pack, CHEMKEY, 25 piece, nitrite 216 17 1406428 DPD Total Chlorine, 25mL pk/1,000 powder pillows 24 Chemkeys, Reagents and other consumables are used for the following HACH instruments: • SL1000 - Portable Parallel Analyzer • APA 6000, AMC 5500sc - Ammonia/Monochloramine Analyzers • DR 900 - Multiparameter Portable Colorimeter • CL 17 - Chlorine Analyzer 2. Scope of work A. Delivery Contractor shall make inside delivery to City locations within seven to ten calendar days after order is placed. The price will be quoted F.O.B. destination, inside delivery to City of Corpus Christi facility, freight prepaid. Page 1 of 2 Delivery, as used in this section, means the product has been ordered and received by the City. Receipt of the product that does not conform to specifications will not be accepted by the City. Contractor understands and agrees that the City may, at its discretion, cancel the order due to the Contractor's inability to deliver the product within the seven to ten calendar day stipulation. Cancelations shall be in writing and sent to the Contractor by email, fax, or mail. No restocking fee or payment of any kind shall be owed for the canceled order due to Contractor's inability to meet the seven to ten calendar day delivery deadline. The return to Contractor of late order received after the cancellation notice has been sent shall be at Contractor's expense. Delivery must be made during normal working hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. C.T. Emergency deliveries and weekend deliveries must be available as needed. B. Defective Goods Contractor shall pay for return shipment of product that arrives in a defective, unusable or inoperable condition including expired products (shelf life varies from 90 days to 2 years). Contractor must arrange for the return shipment of damaged products. 3. Special Instructions The HACH Chemkeys and Reagents will be delivered as follows: Deliver to: 0. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Warehouse 13101 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, Texas 78410 Contact: Ruben Arguijo at 361-815-9072 Page 2 of 2 e Quote Number: 100268841v7 Use quote number at time of order to ensure that you receive prices quoted Quote Date: 07/19/2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PO BOX 9277 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78469-9277 Name: Ruben Arguijo Phone: 3618159072 Email: rubenar@cctexas.com Customer Account Number : 092064 Customer Quote Reference: Year One 2017-2018 Quote Expiration: 09/17/2017 Sales Contact: Alejandro Varela Email: avarela@hach.com Phone: 800-227-4224 M1II1IN11N von °I14141111(11'1' 1:41P"iti'v"I''''11"70'(41110firrflitiqrrtillirdiivirrifaird Quotation Hach PO Box 608 Loveland, CO 80539-0608 Phone: (800) 227-4224 Email: quotes@hach.com Website: www.hach.com r1( ntw �w� 1 9429100 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL CHLORINE 1320 17.79 5% 16 90 2 9429400 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, MONO- CHLOROMINE 1056 44.45 5% 42.23 3 9429500 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE FREE AMMONIA 1056 48.85 5% 46.41 4 9425200 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL AMMONIA 1056 62.19 5% 59.08 5 2876453 APA ACIDIC SURFACTANT WASH, 1L 296 24.29 5% 23.08 6 2776653 Std 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 144 20.35 5% 19.33 7 2776753 Std 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 25.39 5% 24.12 8 2776353 Rgt 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 56.69 5% 53.86 9 2776453 Rgt 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 23.05 5% 21.90 22,308.0C 44,594.8E 49,008.9E 62,388.4E' 6,831.6E 2,783.52 2,604.9(1 5,816.8E 2,365.2C 10 2776553 Rgt 3, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 33.45 5% 2557000 aa Total Chlorine Reagent Set, DPD (includes indicator and buffer. For Rapid Liquid Method, CL17 Process Analyzer, and bulk analytical methods) 492 54.85 5% 31.78 52 1 3,432.2 25,638.1'. 12 25233000 KTO: 5500SC AMMONIA MONOCHLORAMINE REAGENT SET 10 191.00 5% 181.45 1,814.5( 13 27 Estimated freight charge 1 4,610.79 4,610.79 4,610.75 Water Quality Sirr - Crystal Ybanez 14 9429100 5 9429600 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL CHLORINE KTO CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE MONO -CHLOR. AND 25 PIECE FREE AMMONIA 216 17.79 5% 16.90 3,650.4C 216 97.69 5% 92.81 20,046.9E 6 9429300 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, NITRITE 216 34.29 5% 32.58 7,037.2&. 1 1406428 DPD Total Chlorine, 25mL pk/1,000 Powder Pillows DU 11 1111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 01111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111111111 1 1111111111111111111 7 24 208.00 5% 7.97.60 4,742.4C, qu ......0000000000000000000000000000000000 1111111110111111111111111111111111111110111100000000000000000000000000000001111110110110300000000000000000000001000101000100300000000000000000000000000000ririervirriertrir0000°°0"" 19111,10101010 iirilli101030)0)0)rill3030100131011001000101001011311.31101313000001if'illijilrill10013ll1011101010100111111011111111f1111131101101131.01110133(1131111113310f1011F111ififIIIIII(IIIII31011001(,,,,,oll,"•11,,,°fll 00,0010.101101(1111161010,... 11.1,11..1.111.111.11111111111110,1 NIS „„„„„„„„„„„„r„„„„„„„„„ 10011011011010101001200210220200102121021210212102121121021211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100000000000004E0 00, Freight: Ground Prepay and Add FCA: Hach's facility All purchases of Hach Company products and/or services are expressly and without limitation subject to Hach Company's Terms & Conditions of Sale ("Hach TCS"), incorporated Page 1 of 4 Quote Number: 100274694v3 Use quote number at time of order to ensure that you receive prices quoted Quote Date: 08/10/2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PO BOX 9277 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78469-9277 Name: Ruben Arguijo Phone: 3618159072 Email: rubenar@cctexas.com Customer Account Number : 092064 Customer Quote Reference: Year Two 2018-2019 Quote Expiration.. 10/09/2017 Sales Contact: Alejandro Varela Email: avarela@hach.com Phone: 800-227-4224 )1141001111011611..1$ inneginfiliAMINSIONNSWEWIESSIONEVISI Quotation Hach PO Box 608 Loveland, CO 80539-0608 Phone: (800) 227-4224 Email: quotes@hach.com Website: www.hach.com 1140112121111 /3);!ii;j1 1 9429100 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL CHLORINE 1320 18.79 5% 17.85 2 9429400 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, MONO- CHLOROMINE 1056 45.79 5% 43.50 9429500 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE FREE AMMONIA 1056 50.32 5% 47.80 4 9425200 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL AMMONIA 1056 64.06 5% 60.86 5 2876453 APA ACIDIC SURFACTANT WASH, 1L 296 25.02 5% 23.77 6 2776653 Std 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 144 20.96 5% 19.91 7 2776753 Std 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 26.16 5% 24.85 8 2776353 Rgt 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 58.39 5% 55.47 9 2776453 Rgt 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 23.75 5% 22.56 10 2776553 Rgt 3, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 34.46 5% 32.74 11 2557000 aa Total Chlorine Reagent Set, DPD (includes indicator and buffer. For Rapid Liquid Method, CL17 Process Analyzer, and bulk analytical methods) 492 56.50 5% 53.67 12 25233000 KTO: 5500SC AMMONIA MONOCHLORAMINE REAGENT SET 10 196.73 5% 186.89 13 27 Estimated freight charge 4,741.35 4,741.35 23,562.00 45,936.00 50,476.80 64,268.16 7,035.92 2,867.04 2,683.80 5,990.76 2,436.48 3,535.92 26,405.64 1,868.90 4,741.35 3,650.40 20,046.96 7,037.28 4,742.40 Water Quality Sirr for Crystal Ybanez 14 9429100 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL CHLORINE 216 17.79 5% 16.90 15 9429600 KTO CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE MONO -CHLOR. AND 25 PIECE FREE AMMONIA 216 97.69 5% 92.81 16 9429300 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, NITRITE 216 34.29 5% 32.58 7 1406428 11- DPD Total Chlorine, 25mL pk/1,000 Powder Pillows 24 208.00 5% 97.60 ����������� VIIIIVIIIIIVII VVV 99999999g99 699,I1111IIIIIIIIIIIII ,IIIIIVVIIIIIIIII Illllllllllllu IVVIIVI VII IIIVI II VI IVIV61VVIIIpppppliii��iil# 00.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Freight: Ground Prepay and Add FCA: Hach's facility All purchases of Hach Company products and/or services are expressly and without limitation subject to Hach Company's Terms & Conditions of Sale ("Hach TCS"), incorporated Page 2 of 4 Quote Number: 100274744v3 Use quote number at time of order to ensure that you receive prices quoted Quote Date: 08/10/2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PO BOX 9277 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78469-9277 Name: Ruben Arguijo Phone: 3618159072 Email: rubenar@cctexas.com Customer Account Number : 092064 Customer Quote Reference: Year Three 2019-2020 Sales Contact: Alejandro Varela Email. avarela@hach.com irs m Quote Expiration: 10/09/2017 Phone: 800-227-4224 o Quotation Hach PO Box 608 Loveland, CO 80539-0608 Phone: (800) 227-4224 Email: quotes@hach.com Website: www.hach.com rl,„"Ligii,,,\111.r J�111110 NI 15: 11116,1" „ 'Et 11111111111111111,111107111MMENSWEINIMANIMENSTIMINSIMICTOREMEINI 1 9429100 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL CHLORINE 1320 18.33 5% 17.41 22,981.20 2 9429400 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, MONO- CHLOROMINE 1056 45.79 5% 43.50 45,936.00 3 9429500 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE FREE AMMONIA 1056 50.32 5% 47.80 50,476.80 4 9425200 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL AMMONIA 1056 64.06 5% 60.86 64,268.16 5 2876453 APA ACIDIC SURFACTANT WASH, 1L 296 25.03 5% 23.78 7,038.88 6 2776653 Std 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 144 20.96 5% 19.91 2,867.04 7 2776753 Std 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 26.15 5% 24.84 2,682.72 8 2776353 Rgt 1, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 58.39 5% 55.47 5,990.76 9 2776453 Rgt 2, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 23.75 5% 22.56 2,436.48 10 2776553 Rgt 3, Ammonia/Monochloramine 1L 108 34.45 5% 32.73 3,534.84 11 2557000 aa Total Chlorine Reagent Set, DPD (includes indicator and buffer. For Rapid Liquid Method, CL17 Process Analyzer, and bulk analytical methods) 492 56.50 5% 53.67 26,405.64 12 25233000 KTO: 5500SC AMMONIA MONOCHLORAMINE REAGENT SET 10 196.73 5% 186.89 1,868.90 13 27 Estimated freight charge 1 4,729.75 4,729.75 4,729.75 Water Quality SIRR - Crystal Ybanez 14 9429100 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, TOTAL CHLORINE 216 18.86 5% 17.92 3,870.72 15 9429600 KTO CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE MONO -CHLOR. AND 25 PIECE FREE AMMONIA 216 103.55 5% 98.37 21,247.92 16 9429300 ASSY., PACK, CHEMKEY, 25 PIECE, NITRITE 216 36.34 5% 34.52 7,456.32 17 1406428 10111110111111111 11011111111111111111111,119111111111111111111111001011Tr0111111011001101111111r3110=110102010111110111011111 DPD Total Chlorine, 25mL pk/1,000 Powder Pillows 0 24 220.48 5% 209.46 5,027.04 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII l :: S SS q V`. Freight: Ground Prepay and Add FCA: Hach's facility All purchases of Hach Company products and/or services are expressly and without limitation subject to Hach Company's Terms & Conditions of Sale ("Hach TCS"), incorporated Page 3 of 4 herein by reference and published on Hach Company's website at www.hach.com/terms. Hach TCS are contained directly and/or by reference in Hach's offer, order acknowledgment, and invoice documents. The first of the following acts constitutes an acceptance of Hach's offer and not a counteroffer and creates a contract of sale "Contract" in accordance with the Hach TCS: (i) Buyer's issuance of a purchase order document against Hach's offer; (10 acknowledgement of Buyer's order by Hach; or (iii) commencement of any performance by Hach pursuant to Buyer's order. Provisions contained in Buyer's purchase documents (including electronic commerce interfaces) that materially alter, add to or subtract from the provisions of the Hach TCS are not part of the Contract. Due to International regulations, a U.S. Department of Commerce Export License may be required. Hach reserves the right to approve specific shipping agents. Wooden boxes suitable for ocean shipment are extra. Specify final destination to ensure proper documentation and packing suitable for International transport. In addition, Hach may require : 1). A statement of intended end-use; 2).Certificatlon that the intended end-use does not relate to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (prohibited nuclear end use, chemical 1 biological weapons, missile technology); and 3). Certification that the goods will not be diverted contrary to U.S. law. ORDER TERMS: Terms are Subject to Credit Review Please reference the quotation number on your purchase order. Sales tax is not included. Applicable sales tax will be added to the invoice based on the U.S. destination, if applicable provide a resale/exemption certificate. Shipments will be prepaid and added to invoices unless otherwise specified. Equipment quoted operates with standard U.S. supply voltage. Hach standard terms and conditions apply to all sales. Additional terms and conditions apply to orders for service partnerships. Prices do not Include delivery of product. Reference attached Freight Charge Schedule and Collect Handling Fees. Standard lead time is 30 days. This Quote is good for a one time purchase. Sales Contact: Prepared By: Name: Alejandro Varela Name: Becci Wegener Title: Regional Sales Manager Title: Field Sales Support Specialist Phone: 800-227-4224 Phone: 1-800-227-4224 X6243 Email: avarela@hach.com Email: bwegener@hach.com Page 4 of 4 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Section 5. is null for this Supply Agreement. Page 1 of 1 Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Section 8. Warranty is null for this Supply Agreement. Page 1 of 1 CERTIFICATE OF INTE ESTED ARIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION Certificate 2017-255735 Date 08/31/2017 Date OFFICE USE ONLY OF FILING Number: Filed: Acknowledged: and provide a 1 of 2 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and business. Hach Loveland, CO United States country of he business entity's place to the contracto which the form is Name of governmental entity or ate agency that is a party being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Supply Agreement No 1342 Hach Products and Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) ControUing Intermediary 5 6 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ar, or FFIDAVIT MELANIE BOGUS I sw NOTARY PUBLIC , STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20154018968 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13, 2019 FFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. -12 ; ,../), , $ ,. Signature ofauthorized agent ofcontracting business entity •.), (PT , this the day of Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said " )Y 1\,),,,,,J 20 - , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. ) tl C., ,) 'i -' 11\) /11 ,/7 i '(S' it 12-.1--L Signature of officer ad Isterrng oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of office administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Vers on V1.0.3337 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS (City Charter Article IV, Sections 7 & 8) I, the Director of Financial Services of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (or his/her duly authorized representative), hereby certify to the City Council and other appropriate officers that the money required for the current fiscal year's portion of the contract, agreement, obligation or expenditure described below is in the Treasury to the credit of the Fund specified below, from which it is to be drawn, and has not been appropriated for any other purpose. Future payments are subject to annual appropriation by the City Council. City Council Action Date: October 10, 2017 Legistar Number: 17-1170 Agenda Item: Resolution finding that the purchase of chemkeys and reagents for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant is a sole source procurement; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with Hach Company of Loveland, Colorado, for the purchase of chemkeys and reagents for a total amount not to exceed $825,780.23 for a three-year term, with an annual step price increase. Amount Required: $ 0.00 Fund Name Account No. Fund No. Org. No. Project No. Amount Water -Stevens Filter Plant 520030 4010 31010 $0.00 Water -Water Quality 520030 4010 31501 $0.00 Total $0.00 x Certification Not Required Director of Financial Services Date: AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 26, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Executive Director of Utilities DanGcctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services -Purchasing Division Kimb2(cr�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Supply Agreement CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with Chemtrade Chemicals US, LLC, of Parsippany, New Jersey for the purchase of liquid ammonium sulfate solution in response to Request for Bid (RFB) No. 1261, based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid, for a total amount not to exceed $ 350,941.00, of which $175,470.50 will be funded by the Water Fund in FY2017-18. The term of the agreement is for two years with an option to extend for two additional two-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $2,105,646.00. PURPOSE: This item is to approve a supply agreement for liquid ammonium sulfate solution for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution will be used as a source of ammonia in the formation of chloramines to disinfect the treated water. The City received one responsive, responsible bid, out of 26 notifications issued, and is recommending the award to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Chemtrade Chemicals US, LLC. ALTERNATIVES: No feasible alternatives. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurements. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department — Water FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $0 $2,105,646.00 $2,105,646.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0 $0.00 This item $0 $2,105,646.00 $2,105,646.00 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 Fund(s): Water Comments: The initial contract term total is $350,941.00, with a total potential multi-year amount of up to $2,105,646.00. $175,470.50 will be funded by the Water Fund in FY2017-18, and annual funding will be requested during future budget years. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Supply Agreement Bid Tabulation Bid Tabulation RFB # 1261 Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution Chemtrade Chemicals, LLC Parsippany, New Jersey EXTENDED PRICE 0 0 0 Lo 0 o co p.i 0 0 CT, 00 p.9 - I— W $179.00 *$18.91/15 Min ZU—a, �a O 25 U H c HR Z m o DESCRIPTION Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution for O.N. Stevens Water Plant Unloading Delay W — N 1- 0EA H s- t 0▪ ) t (1) - co co vi 0) an CO O a+ O O - 0) ▪ (1) Q O LoLo v, tri • N CO 4 - dA 0 O i ++ O 0 O vi V) C O 0) co c 0) U _0 0 • 1.1 i 0) - O +� O 0) Ql i (6 • 0) Q - L O (1) 'L Q Q) dA O • (6 7 O I C Zr)CO ) dA Q c rl -6 Ql CO 00 O — i/? -0 4- 0.) 0) - - E (o - O - U U s- < o SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 1261 Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution THIS Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution Supply Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and Chemtrade Chemicals, LLC ("Supplier"), effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Supplier has bid to provide Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution in response to Request for Bid No. 1261 ("RFB"), which RFB includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB and the Supplier's bid response are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Supplier agree as follows: Scope. Supplier will provide Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. "Goods," "products", and "supplies", as used in this Agreement, refer to and have the same meaning. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 24 months. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to two additional 24 -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then - current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Supplier and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $350,941.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 1 of 7 this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Name: Diana Zertuche- Garza Department: Utilities Phone: (361) 826-1827 Email: dianaG@cctexas.com 5. Insurance. Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Supplier must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of products to be provided by the Supplier over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Supplier a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and products will remain with the Supplier until such time as the products are delivered and accepted by the City. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any products that are delivered but not accepted by the City must be corrected or replaced immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or replacement at no charge cannot be made by the Supplier, a replacement product may be bought by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid price, must be paid by the Supplier within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Supplier warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Supplier warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Foram Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 2 of 7 Agreement shall be warranted by the Supplier or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the dose of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 301h annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Supplier will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such products in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Supplier be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Supplier may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Supplier must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid. In using subcontractors, the Supplier is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Supplier. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Supplier and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 3 of 7 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Supplier covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Diana Zertuche- Garza Title: Contracts/Fund Administrator Address: 13101 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas 78410 Fax: (361) 826-4488 IF TO SUPPLIER: Chemtrade Chemicals, LLC Attn: Elizabeth Ryno Title: Marketing Specialist Address: 90 East Halsey Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054 Fax: (973) 515-4461 17. SUPPLIER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 4 of 7 CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. SUPPLIER MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF SUPPLIER UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Supplier's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Supplier written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Supplier has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Supplier. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Supplier for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Supplier, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Supplier is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 5 of 7 but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Supplier's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Supplier agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 6 of 7 SUPPLIER CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC f Signature: � �. Printed Name: ELIZABETH RYNO Title: Date: MARKETING SPECIALIST SEPT 5, 2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment 13: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB No. 1261 Exhibit 2: Supplier's Bid Response City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal form 7/1 /16 Page 7 of 7 Attachment A - Scope of Work 1.1 General Requirements/Background Information The Supplier shall provide Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution as outlined in this Scope of Work to be used at the City of Corpus Christi Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants. This chemical is used for disinfection of the water and wastewater and must conform to all the requirements of this specification. 1.2 Scope of Work The Supplier shall provide with every delivery a chemical analysis for each chemical shipment, and the chemical analysis must include the ammonia (NH3) percentage, specific gravity and pH. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Chemical- The Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution will be used as a source of ammonia in the formation of chloramines to disinfect the treated water. Ammonium Sulfate obtained as a by-product in the manufacture of coal gas and coke is not acceptable for use in the potable water treatment. The chemical and physical properties of the liquid ammonium sulfate shall be as follows: Appearance and odor: Clear, Pale Yellow Liquid - No odor pH 4.8 - 7.5 Solubility in Water Complete Specific Gravity 1.20 - 1.23 Soluble Iron (mg/L) <10 Freeze Point (deg. F) <10 Boiling Point (deg. F) 214-216 Sulfuric Acid Diammonium 38-40% (wt.% dry salt) Ammonium Sulfate Solution 10% (25% of the 40% dry salt wt.) 1.3 Delivery and Weighing Requirements 1. The Supplier will be responsible for unloading the chemical. The Supplier shall provide any special equipment necessary for unloading, up to and including, hoses, connections, compressors, etc. 2. The Supplier must provide an affidavit of compliance to the City of Corpus Christi stating that at the time of delivery the chemical furnished under the release order complies with all applicable requirements of this specification. 3. City of Corpus Christi Plant Supervisors, or their designee, may take a sample of any chemical shipment for testing prior to unloading of the chemical. In addition, approximately every three (3) months during the supply agreement, the City will take a random sample of the chemical upon delivery. This sample will be sent to an independent laboratory chosen by the City, and tested for all items outlined in the product specifications. 4. The Plant Supervisor may reject any chemical shipments that contain a concentration of any component outside the allowable concentration range as specified in the product specifications. 5. Deliveries of Liquid Ammonium Sulfate solution must be by drivers thoroughly trained and familiar with the related hazards, safety measures, and spill cleanup procedures for Liquid Ammonium Sulfate solution. All spills and leakage, regardless of size must be properly and immediately cleaned up by Supplier's personnel. The Supplier shall be required to respond to any and all such emergencies within eight (8) hours of being notified. 6. The Supplier shall allow two (2) hours "unloading time" for each chemical shipment, starting from the time the load enters the plant site to the time the unloading of the chemical shipment is completed. Unloading of the chemical is complete when unloading apparatus is disconnected from storage facilities and secured, and a designated City of Corpus Christi representative has signed all delivery tickets for each respective load. Any unloading time in excess of two (2) hours which is directly attributable to the City will be paid for at the unit price bid for "Unloading Delays," rounded and prorated to the nearest quarter hour. This amount shall be included with the invoice for payment for that particular load of chemical. 7. Shipment(s) will be delivered in 4,500 gallon lots in properly cleaned tank trucks. Each chemical shipment must be weighed on a state certified truck scale located within the city limits of Corpus Christi before delivery to and after unloading at the water treatment plant. 8. The Supplier shall be responsible for mailing a legible copy of each chemical shipment weight "ticket" to the respective City of Corpus Christi Water Production Supervisor within 5 business days of delivery of the chemical. Payments to the Supplier will not be processed unless this requirement is met. 9. Deliveries shall be made between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday, excluding holidays, unless specific arrangements are made otherwise. 10. Orders will be placed by telephone or email. The Supplier will deliver the amount of Liquid Ammonium Sulfate solution ordered within twenty-four (24) hours of order placement. No minimum or maximum purchase of Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution is guaranteed by the City within the duration of the contract. 1.4 Deliveries will be made to the following location: O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant -13101 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, Texas, 78410 1.5 Other Requirements 1. All materials supplied must comply with all requirements and standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). All appropriate markings shall be in place before delivery. Items not meeting OSHA specifications will be refused. 2. The Supplier shall base its billing and quantity for each chemical shipment on "local" certified weight tickets for the delivery of Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution, by weight, as indicated in the chemical analysis for that load. 3. The Supplier must submit the chemical analysis, weight ticket, and bill of lading with each invoice. 4. Prior to initial use of the Liquid Ammonium Sulfate solution, and annually thereafter, the Supplier shall conduct a minimum of two (2) training seminars for the City's operating personnel on the application and control of the Liquid Ammonium Sulfate solution, and shall include the following: a. Basic chemical properties of the Liquid Ammonium Sulfate solution b. Safety training c. Equipment operation/set up d. Safety Data Sheet 1.6 Supplier Quality Control and Superintendence The Supplier shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Supplier will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirements. 1.7 Timeline The Contractor should be prepared to begin work immediately upon award. Unless otherwise approved in writing by Contract Administrator. The final timetable will depend on several factors including the extent of the background research, level of autonomy in which we work and the availability of the evaluating committee Attachment B - Bid/Pricing Schedule Date: AUGUST 8, 2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BID FORM PURCHASING DIVISION RFB No. 1261 Liquid Ammonium Sulfate Solution Authorized Bidder: CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC Signature: PAGE 1 OF 1 4L- ELIZA ETH RYNO, MARING SPECIALIST 1. Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Contract Terms and Condfiions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price for each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices. b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer, and the Disclosure of Interest information on file with City's Purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true. c. Bidder is current with all taxes due and company is in good standing with all applicable governmental agencies. d. Bidder acknowledges receipt and review of all addenda for this RFB. 4. Bidders must not write over or revise the bid form. Bidders will be considered Non - Responsive if the bid form is modified. Item Description UNIT QTY Unit Price Total Price 1 O.N. Stevens Water Plant TONS 1,950 $179.00frON $349,050.00 2 Total Unload' , Dela HR 25 C *4-1-84-14-5444N- kS 1,891.00 $350,941.00 * A CHARGE OF $18,91 PER 15 MINUTE PERIOD (Quarter hour) WILL BE ASSESSED_ IN REGARDS TO DETENTION CHARGES, AFTER THE THIRD HOUR COMBINED LOADING AND UNLOADING PER PAGE 19 OF THE BID DOCUMENTS. COST OF 575.64 PER HOUR. Attachment C -insurance Requirements CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability Statutory and complies with Part 11 of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 POLLUTION LIABILITY (Including Cleanup and remediation) $1,000,000 Per Incident Limit $1,000,000 Aggregate C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2017 Insurance Requirements Utilities — O.N. Stevens Plant Supply and Deliver Liquid Ammonium Sulfate 07/10/2017 sw Risk Management Attachment D - Warranty Requirements No warranty requirements for this supply agreement; Section 8. Warranty is null for this supply agreement. Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-255338 Date Filed: 08/30/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Chemtrade Chemicals US LLC Parsippany, NJ United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. RFB 1261 LIQUID AMMONIUM SULFATE SOLUTION 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. Signature of authorized nt of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the saki ANN HOPLER , this the 29TH day of AUGUST 20 17 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Elizabeth Ryno Notary Public State of NJ ((a�Qq - �� Lt tl� ("t r�1 10-20 Sign tore of officer admini eying oath Printed n o �4 Mii�rlg`dttfh Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.3337 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 12, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Tom Tagliabue, Director, Intergovernmental Relations tomtag@cctexas.com 361.826.3850 Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit one or more grant applications in the amount of up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) to the Office of the Governor for funding from the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant Program. CAPTION: Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit one or more grant applications in the amount of up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) to the Office of the Governor for funding from the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant Program. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to receive authorization to submit one or more grant applications to the State of Texas, Office of the Governor for the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's (TMPC) Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant (DEAAG) Program. The application is due October 16, 2017. The TMPC will score and award the grants at its December 13, 2017 meeting in Austin. The City and the South Texas Military Facilities Task Force are working closely with Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (NASCC) and the Corpus Christi Army Depot (CCAD) to come up with two new proposed projects that more closely identify with their specific military mission and which provide an opportunity for local matching funds. The two projects proposed are: NASCC - Construct and connect a new water pipeline on the north perimeter of the base to strategically ensure resilient and redundant supply of water to Naval Air Station Corpus Christi's 41 tenant commands and the 506 facilities that are critical to the base's mission. Page 1 of 3 CCAD - Construct perimeter fencing and access control gates around Army helicopter repair facilities to enhance security of mission -critical aircraft and components. The City may submit a single application for both projects or individual applications for each project. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The DEAAG program is administered by the TMPC within the Office of the Governor. DEAAG is codified in Government Code, Chapter 436, and the program administrative rules are in Subchapter B, Title 1, Chapter 4, Texas Administrative Code. The purpose of the program is to provide state funding for any of the followings: • Acquiring federal grant assistance; • For sharing in the cost of redevelopment of communities that have been adversely or positively affected by the Base Realignment and Closure Act or Department of Defense reduction or loss of funding; or • In the case of infrastructure, adds military value to the military installation. The 85th Texas Legislature appropriated $20 million for the biennium (Fiscal Years 2018-2019) and the TMPC will only have one round of grant awards for available funding. Maximum value of awards is five million dollars ($5,000,000). The City previously applied in 2015 and 2016, but were not successful. In both instances the City's application finished just outside the money. The City's previous applications had two deficiencies: (1) lack of local matching funds and (2) ranking on military value. For the two projects proposed by the City, the match will be: • Water Line: Utilities Department will use Capital Improvement funds (in-kind and cash) up to an estimated ($1,000,000) to construct approximately 4,500 linear feet of eight -inch water pipeline along Ocean Drive from Ennis Joslin Road (Spur 3) to the edge of Navy property. • Security Fencing: CCAD will use Army Working Capital Fund (approximately $1,000,000). The DEAAG program generally requires a 50% match, but the TMPC may reduce that to a 20% match or 100% grant with no match, if the local government can demonstrate that resources are not available because of limited local budgets. The match can be either cash or in-kind services. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do not submit DEAAG applications 2. Submit DEAAG applications, but without local matching funds 3. Propose different projects for DEAAG application OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable Page 2 of 3 CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Utilities Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue OX Capital Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017-2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: Not applicable RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval request and funding for the display. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Presentation Page 3 of 3 A RESOLUTION Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit a grant application in the amount of up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) to the Office of the Governor for funding from the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant Program. WHEREAS, With 15 major installations, numerous headquarters, open spaces for realistic training, low cost of living and outstanding support to military and families, Texas has a long, significant and proud history of partnership with the defense of our nation; and WHEREAS, active duty and reserve installations across the branches of service in Texas have an economic impact of roughly $150 billion to the Texas economy per year and 255,000 uniformed and civilian employees which generates a significant amount of sales tax revenue for the State; and WHEREAS, these military installations are also part of the fabric of many communities and are a source of great pride, provide skilled workforce, add to population growth, and have significant economic impact; and WHEREAS, Naval Air Station Corpus Christi and the 41 tenant commands on base, including the Corpus Christi Army Depot, have an estimated employment of 7,960 full-time active duty, civilian and contractor employees making the base the largest employer in the City; and WHEREAS, the State of Texas and local communities have the opportunity to make Texas the most effective and efficient location for the Department of Defense to train and operate and could create initiatives to make Texas the #1 "military friendly" place for service members and their families to live, work and play; and WHEREAS, many Texas companies have contracts to provide services with local military installations creating jobs and additional tax revenue; and the State of Texas is in the top three states for receiving Department of Defense contracts, with the top awards going to aircraft development; and WHEREAS, the installations in the state are vital to national security and Texas has specialized in mobilizing and deploying troops, over 1 million, in the past 12 years; and to support this mobilization, the installations and depots have dedicated railheads and runways capable of handling large passenger and cargo aircraft, and Texas has road and rail transportation to Texas ports for deployments with dedicated roll on roll off Navy ships berthed at Texas ports along with the necessary infrastructure at the ports for storage and loading of the ships; and WHEREAS, Texas has unencumbered airspace, ground maneuver space, and open water for training of all branches of service with virtually every weapon system as well as some of the most diverse topography for excellent training scenarios, the weather provides for the ability to train year round and deployments from Texas installations are efficient due to airfields, road systems, and rail transportation to ports in the state and, finally, the cost of living at Texas installations are some of the lowest in the country; and Page 1of3 WHEREAS, the 85th Texas Legislature appropriated $20 million to the Texas Military Preparedness Commission Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant fund to assist defense communities that have been, or may potentially be, impacted by a past or future BRAC action, to obtain economic assistance to mitigate or prevent or otherwise positively affect their local economy through funded projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi's previous two applications were not funded by the Texas Military Preparedness Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Military Preparedness Commission will accept grant applications for the 2017 round of $20 million in DEAAG funds between September 1, 2017, and October 16, 2017, to be awarded December 7, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi's goal is to submit a DEAAG application that benefits both Naval Air Station Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Army Depot. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to submit a grant application in the amount of up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) to the Office of the Governor for funding from the Texas Military Preparedness Commission's Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant Program for the following projects: (a) NASCC Construct water pipeline to ensure redundant, interruptible supply of water to Naval Air Station Corpus Christi facilities and the 41 tenant commands critical to the mission of the base. (b) CCAD - Construct perimeter fencing and access control gates around Army helicopter repair facilities to enhance security of mission -critical aircraft and components. Adopted this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of Page 2 of 3 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey -Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Page 3of3 11111111,111111111 • 0 0 I cn 7-1 .1..- et a) c O .� v) E E 0 c 73 a) a) co az c6 co O co O O 2 O O cn O c X O N z i IN H 0 N N r -I 0 730) r9 4 O O o % E O O QJ ii)' O O r0 Uo Q E o a U �. O 2oD w a •- O - X 12 U •U I -- co a--• az (6 1 a 2 a a LL .44 cv bo bA V Pt: 094 -w V .� •s O co Lo o N 00 N N O N O N al O O m d - Nn Lm 000 No m Ln O Ln Ln 00 Ln m N m m 4. -In- -In- -In- -In- L9 a U w I 0 CU CD C (130 4-1 m+.1 Q CO CD J J L 5 - CD 41 d) CD CD ., a U co U v cC .0 CU 4J U CU 4A 4J (/) .X LU a W 0 CU LL U CU Water Line Ennis Joslin to NASCC Gate I v v I Water Line ater Treatment Plant NASCC Gate to NASCC Proposed 8" Dia, 6,506 L_F_ Redundant/Resilient Waterline Along Ocean Drive �� Security Fencing ���'600 ,„„0,0000111.10010,0,00�Pow�r1 lu0 !""n 01 a IOIVWPvr nh IM001 ,, 000000 11!,° � ON'10'1000000,1111111.10100,01010''°00,00,'°°'' 00040000,0 Awl; rrwdTMa ry�ryy" V'��A wwvvw'fWrwww+M YYY II�IIII rrrrI � ip NM'111010N m V "11111111Illi 4!4'i 1 itIII ' a I111110100 00'1 I 10004,0' ,wN "NIVVI %11v111111111.1.1.111 11! iiu flUllu!IIIIII 11111111111111))1,11111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111*I hVr '1‘ , I11111.11H, H�w,0,,111111111111„1111111111111111111111111111111 YN )��j Y I'QimVipMNWW"Mww I�w4 , °=G = q V MI 111 1, i III II1III�w611'1 i� r v III !IIV 111111111 ff 11 l l ,.1:1,):1,.1:1,)..1:1..1.� luuuuuuflll �llll lllllllllllll, (u 11110111110 ° IV I,NP �IWMw IkMmNNAum I'�Im�yMwWo �wwww ,xmli wWwww 111 ie 11 1111111„, 11 8 1 1 I �lw w ooul111,1 mom mosIII 1 w� En sol IP 11 hI'Na sem IUWom „111 Not INLM0M ��I l1111NiNMMJAs'"“ IIIVo1Iwww W„NMArni MldmmititIp 1 I ^^99 00100.000 JJ 00101010 .0100, .0100.00:0°°01°V .0,00000 00000000 00111101000001 00000000 100000000000100000000000010010000100 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 11, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Culbertson (361) 882-7448 mculbertson@ccredc.com Small Business Agreement for Del Mar College Internship Program CAPTION: Resolution to approve a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Del Mar College (Del Mar) to provide grant up to $150,000 for their internship program to assist small businesses. PURPOSE: Approve a Small Business Incentive agreement for Del Mar College's Internship Program for Small Business Assistance until December 31, 2018 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Del Mar College has a program where students can work for a local company as an intern. The local company will pay minimum wage while the Type A grant will match the wage up to $5.00 per hour plus FICA. This encourages companies to hire interns, it allows the student to get real work experience, and has a goal to create new jobs. The Type A Board has funded this program since 2007. This agreement would run until December 31' which is the end of a semester to better manage the program. The Board of Directors of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation recommended approval during their July 13, 2017 meeting. The Type A Board approved the grant at their September 18, 2017 meeting. Del Mar College Internship Progress Report 2008-2016 Year # of F/T Jobs Created # of P/T Interns Placed # of Interns Placed # of Employers unduplicated 2008-2009 8 0 102 27 2009-2010 4 36 71 24 2010-2011 6 16 64 19 2011-2012 6 41 93 22 2012-2013 14 21 85 25 2013-2014 21 24 93 26 2014-2015 23 24 93 29 2015-2016 24 20 93 39 2016-2017 26 93 40 2008-2016 132 182 787 251 ALTERNATIVES: The Council may choose to not fund the program or fund it at a different amount. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This is in keeping with the stated goal of promoting and retaining businesses. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017- 2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year (Fiscal Year 2018) Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 150,000 150,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 150,000 150,000 BALANCE 0 0 Fund: Type A Fund Comments: This item was approved in the Type A Small Business Fiscal Year 2018 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the grant for $150,000 for the internship program. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Agreement Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION Approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Del Mar College (Del Mar) to provide grant up to $150,000 for their internship program to assist small businesses. WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Type A Corporation") has budgeted funds to assist businesses create or retain jobs in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"). WHEREAS, the Type A Corporation has requested proposals from businesses that will create or retain jobs within the City, and determined that the proposal from Del Mar for an intern program within the City will best satisfy this goal; and WHEREAS, City Council deems that it is in the best interest of the City and citizens to approve the business incentives agreement for an intern program between the Type A Corporation and Del Mar. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the business incentives agreement for business development between the Type A Corporation and Del Mar for an intern program within the City of Corpus Christi, in the form attached to this resolution, is approved. This resolution takes effect upon City Council approval on this the day of , 2017. @BCL@280EA8A2.docx Page 2of2 ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey -Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn @BCL@280EA8A2.docx SMALL BUSINESS INCENTIVES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND DEL MAR COLLEGE FOR AN INTERN PROGRAM TO SUPPORT SMALL BUSINESSES This Small Business Incentives Agreement for ("Agreement") is entered into between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and Del Mar College, a Texas institution of higher education ("Del Mar"). WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature in Section 4A of Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Revised Civil Statutes (Development Corporation Act of 1979), now codified as Subtitle C1, Title 12, Texas Local Government Code, Section 504.002 et seq, ("the Act"), empowered local communities with the ability to adopt an optional local sales and use tax as a means of improving the economic health and prosperity of their citizens; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, residents of the City of Corpus Christi ("City") passed Proposition 2, New and Expanded Business Enterprises, which authorized the adoption of a sales and use tax for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises at the rate of one-eighth of one percent to be imposed for 15 years; WHEREAS, the 1/8th cent sales tax authorized by passage of Proposition 2 was subsequently enacted by the City Council and filed with the State Comptroller of Texas, effective April 1, 2003, to be administered by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Board; WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation exists for the purposes of encouraging and assisting entities in the creation of jobs for the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board"), on November 14, 2016, amended the Corporation's Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Type A Guidelines"), which the City Council approved on December 20, 2016; WHEREAS, Section 501.073 of The Act requires the City Council to approve all programs and expenditures of the Corporation; WHEREAS, Del Mar has requested business development funds from the Board to assist businesses by providing access to students, who will serve as interns in professional level positions; WHEREAS, the small businesses will pay student interns minimum wage (currently $7.25 per hour) and Del Mar will match the business contribution up to $5.00 per hour. WHEREAS, the interns will be selected based on the needs of the small businesses with the goal of providing the small businesses with resources that make the small businesses more effective and provide growth opportunities; WHEREAS, the primary goal of the program is to provide support to small businesses in Corpus Christi that will encourage growth, retention, economic development, and job creation; WHEREAS, the goal of the project is the creation of 1 new full time job for every 10 internship positions funded (a 10% new job "return on investment"); Page 1 of 9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx WHEREAS, a secondary benefit of the small business intern program is providing students real- world experience, while they are making a living wage without working extended hours and developing potential full-time employment opportunities following graduation; In consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, Corporation and Del Mar agree as follows: 1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement ("Effective Date") is the latest date that either party executes this Agreement. 2. Term. a. The term of this Agreement is for twelve months from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. b. This Agreement may be extended at the option of the Corporation for up to two additional one year terms, contingent upon annual appropriation of funds and approval of the City Council. Per the guidelines, Del Mar must reapply every year for the grant. 3. Grant. a. The Corporation will grant Del Mar an incentive of up to One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), which must be used to fund up to $5.00 per hour for salary plus payroll taxes for interns during the Spring Semester of 2018, Summer Session in 2018, and the Fall Semester 2018, and the entire salary on two interns hired to help administer the program during the Fall and Spring Semesters and Summer Session. The interns will be paid $12.25 per hour, while participating in Del Mar's Small Business Employer Intern Program. b. The Corporation's grant is conditioned upon Del Mar's successful completion of the terms of this Agreement. c. The Corporation's grant shall be paid in monthly installments based upon evidence of the amount paid by Del Mar to the small business employers during the prior month. 4. Del Mar's Duties and Responsibilities. a. Del Mar shall provide administrative oversight and direct supervision for the placement of interns in the Del Mar's Business Employer Intern Program. b. Del Mar shall create and maintain not less than two part-time intern (2) employment positions to assist in the Business Employer Intern Program in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, during the term of this Agreement. The intern must be paid $12.25 per hour. c. Del Mar shall place, with businesses in Corpus Christi, interns during the academic year. (1) Since the primary goal of the Del Mar's Business Employer Intern Program is to provide support to small businesses in Corpus Christi that will encourage growth, retention, economic development, and job creation, placements must be Page 2 of 9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx based on the needs of the small business with the goal of providing the small business with resources that make the business more effective and provide growth opportunities for the businesses. (2) Additionally, interns may be placed at companies that need work skills that have been supported by the Corporation such as Process and Instrumentation and Aviation skills. (3) For the purpose of this section a small business may include chambers of commerce, non-profit organizations, and other entities that will use the intern to assist existing, start-up, and home based small businesses in the City; recruit new small business to the City; assist the expansion of existing small businesses in the City; help entrepreneurs create start-up businesses; or help the owners and managers of small businesses develop their businesses. d. Del Mar shall ensure that the business employer of each intern pays the student intern the minimum wage, and Del Mar shall match the small business employer's payments to the interns up to $5.00 per hour. e. Del Mar shall try to place the interns for 19 hours per week and 12 weeks per semester or summer sessions. f. Del Mar shall work with the businesses that receive interns under the program to encourage the creation of permanent full time jobs for the interns or similarly qualified individuals. 5. Job Creation/Training Qualification. a. In order to count as a created job under this Agreement, the job must pay wages at least as high as the wages required by Section 501.162 of the Act, which is the median wage of the occupation in the Corpus Christi MSA as determined by Texas Workforce Commission's Texas Industry Profiles report. b. In order to qualify for funds to provide job training under this Agreement, Del Mar agrees to create new jobs that pay wages at least as high as the wages required by Section 501.162 of the Act, which is the median wage of the occupation in the Corpus Christi MSA as determined by Texas Workforce Commission's Texas Industry Profiles report. c. A "job" is defined in the Type A Guidelines as a full-time employee, contractor, consultant, or leased employee who has a home address in the Corpus Christi MSA. d. Del Mar agrees to confirm and document to the Corporation that the minimum number of jobs created as a result of funding provided by this Agreement is maintained throughout the term by the Business. e. Del Mar agrees to provide Corporation with a sworn certificate by an authorized representative of each business assisted under this Agreement certifying the number of full-time permanent employees employed by the business. Page 3of9 Agreement Del Mar 201 8.docx f. Del Mar shall ensure that the Corporation is allowed reasonable access to personnel records of the businesses assisted under this Agreement. 6. Reports and Monitoring. a. Del Mar shall provide a report at the end of each semester or summer session certifying the status of compliance through the life of the Agreement. Documentation for jobs may be in the form of quarterly IRS 941 returns, Del Mar employer Quarterly Reports, or employee rosters and other reports listed below: i. number of interns ii. name of companies using interns iii. intern duties iv. whether the intern received a job at that company v. whether the intern received a job in the area. b. Del Mar, during normal working hours shall allow the Corporation and its designee, Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation, reasonable access to Del Mar's employment records and books, to verify employment and all other relevant records related to each of the other economic development considerations and incentives, as stated in this Agreement, but the confidentiality of the records and information must be maintained by Corporation and its designee, unless such records and information shall be required by a court order, a lawfully issued subpoena, or at the direction of the Office of the Texas Attorney General. 7. Warranties. Del Mar warrants and represents to Corporation the following: a. Del Mar is a Texas institution of higher education duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas, and further has all institutional power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted in Corpus Christi, Texas. b. Del Mar has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the terms of this Agreement to the best of its ability. c. Del Mar has timely filed and will timely file all local, State, and Federal tax reports and returns required by laws to be filed and all Texas, assessments, fees, and other governmental charges, including applicable ad valorem taxes, have been timely paid, and will be timely paid , during the term of this Agreement. d. Del Mar has received a copy of the Act, and acknowledges that the funds granted in this Agreement must be utilized solely for purposes authorized under State law and by the terms of this Agreement. e. The parties executing this Agreement on behalf of Del Mar are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of Del Mar. f. Del Mar does not and agrees that it will not knowingly employ an undocumented worker. If, after receiving payments under this Agreement, Del Mar is convicted of a violation under §U.S.C. Section 1324a(f), Del Mar shall repay the payments at the rate Page 4 of 9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx and according to the terms as specified by City Ordinance, as amended, not later than the 120th day after the date Del Mar has been notified of the violation. 8. Compliance with Laws. Del Mar shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments. 9. Non -Discrimination. Del Mar covenants and agrees that Del Mar will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services at, on, or in the Facility, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 10. Force Majeure. If the Corporation or Del Mar is prevented, wholly or in part, from fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement by reason of any act of God, unavoidable accident, acts of enemies, fires, floods, governmental restraint or regulation, other causes of force majeure, or by reason of circumstances beyond its control, then the obligations of the Corporation or Del Mar are temporarily suspended during continuation of the force majeure. If either party's obligation is affected by any of the causes of force majeure, the party affected shall promptly notify the other party in writing, giving full particulars of the force majeure as soon as possible after the occurrence of the cause or causes relied upon. 11. Assignment. Del Mar may not assign all or any part of its rights, privileges, or duties under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the Corporation and City. Any attempted assignment without approval is void, and constitutes a breach of this Agreement. 12. Indemnity. To the extent authorized by law Del Mar covenants to fully indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Corporation, the City, their respective officers, employees, and agents ("Indemnitees") against all liability, damage, loss, claims demands, and actions of any kind on account of personal injuries (including, without limiting the foregoing, workers' compensation and death claims), or property loss or damage of any kind, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with, or are claimed to arise out of or be in any manner connected with Del Mar activities conducted under or incidental to this Agreement, including any injury, loss or damage caused by the sole or contributory negligence of any or all of the Indemnitees. Del Mar must, at its own expense, investigate all those claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend all actions based on those claims and demands with counsel satisfactory to Indemnitees, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other cost and expenses of any kind arising from the liability, damage, loss, claims, demands, or actions. 13. Events of Default by Del Mar. The following events constitute a default of this Agreement by Del Mar: a. The Corporation or City determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of Del Mar contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, certificate, report, or opinion submitted to the Corporation in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made. b. Any judgment is assessed against Del Mar or any attachment or other levy against the property of Del Mar with respect to a claim remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 120 days. Page 5 of 9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx c. Del Mar makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. d. Del Mar files a petition in bankruptcy, or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. e. If taxes owed by Del Mar become delinquent, and Del Mar fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. f. Del Mar changes the general character of business as conducted as of the date this Agreement is approved by the Corporation. 14. Notice of Default. Should the Corporation or City determine that Del Mar is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the Corporation or City shall notify Del Mar in writing of the event of default and provide 60 days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period") for Del Mar to cure the event of default. 15. Results of Uncured Default by Del Mar. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the cure Period, and taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of Del Mar, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the following actions must be taken for any default that remains uncured after the Cure Period: a. Del Mar shall immediately repay all funds paid by Corporation to them under this Agreement. b. Del Mar shall pay Corporation reasonable attorney fees and costs of court to collect amounts due to Corporation if not immediately repaid upon demand from the Corporation. c. Upon payment by Del Mar of all sums due, the Corporation and Del Mar shall have no further obligations to one another under this Agreement. d. Neither the City, the Corporation, nor Del Mar may be held liable for any consequential damages. 16. No Waiver. a. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition of the Agreement. b. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. c. Any waiver or indulgence of Del Mar's default may not be considered an estoppel against the Corporation. d. It is expressly understood that if at any time Del Mar is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the Corporation to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the Corporation may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the Corporation, but Corporation may at any time Page 6 of 9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. 17. Del Mar specifically agrees that Corporation shall only be liable to Del Mar for the actual amount of the money grants to be conveyed to Del Mar, and shall not be liable to Del Mar for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees, or cost of court for any act of default by Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. Payment by Corporation is strictly limited to those funds so allocated, budgeted, and collected solely during the grant term of this Agreement. Corporation shall use its best efforts to anticipate economic conditions and to budget accordingly. However, it is further understood and agreed that, should the actual total sales tax revenue collected for any one year be less than the total amount of grants to be paid to all contracting parties with Corporation for that year, then in that event, all contracting parties shall receive only their pro rata share of the available sales tax revenue for that year, Tess Corporation's customary and usual costs and expenses, as compared to each contracting parties' grant amount for that year, and Corporation shall not be liable to for any deficiency at that time or at any time in the future. In this event, Corporation will provide all supporting documentation, as requested. Payments to be made shall also require a written request from Del Mar to be accompanied by all necessary supporting documentation. 18. The parties mutually agree and understand that funding under this Agreement is subject to annual appropriations by the City Council; that each fiscal year's funding must be included in the budget for that year; and the funding is not effective until approved by the City Council. 19. Notices. a. Any required written notices shall be sent mailed, certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Del Mar: Del Mar College Attn: President 101 Baldwin Corpus Christi, Texas 78404 Corporation: City of Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Attn.: Executive Director 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 b. A copy of all notices and correspondence must be sent the City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn.: City Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Page 7 of 9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx c. Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 20. Incorporation of other documents. The Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Corporation Guidelines"), as amended, are incorporated into this Agreement. 21. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign Agreements on behalf of each party. 22. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the Corporation and Del Mar will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint -venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. 23. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 24. Severability. a. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. b. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 25. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Nueces County, Texas. 26. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole Agreement between Corporation and Del Mar. Any prior Agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 27. Survival of terms of Agreement and obligations of parties. The terms of this Agreement and the obligation of the parties relating to Section 13.a and b shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Page 8of9 Agreement Del Mar 2018.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM: day of , 2017 Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Corpus Christi Business & Job Development Corporation By: Date: Attest: By: Bart Braselton President Rebecca Huerta Assistant Secretary Del Mar College By: Dr/Mark Escamilia, Ph:D rresident Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES / This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,,,)e,;/:::',,,11:227?:;,:p , 2017: by Dr„ Mark Escamilia„ PhD, for Del Mar College: a political subdivision of the State of Texas, on behalf of the college. district. Nary Public .6)tate of Texas Agreement Del Mar 2018.doex JESS CA -14. MAIM Notary ID 0!:12.'659363-5 Nly CoiiisIon Expires 08/08/2020 lonorwrwortarrwrwerno Page 9 of 9 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 4, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Culbertson (361) 882-7448 mculbertson@ccredc.com Small Business Incentives Agreement for Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi Internship Program CAPTION: Resolution to approve a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi (TAMU- CC) to provide grant up to $150,000 for their internship program to assist small businesses. PURPOSE: Award a Type A Grant for Texas A&M University's Internship Program for Small Business Assistance until December 31, 2018 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi has a program where students can work for a local company as an intern. The local company will pay minimum wage while the Type A grant will match the wage up to $5.00 per hour plus FICA. This encourages companies to hire interns, it allows the student to get real work experience, and has a goal to create new jobs. The Type A Board has funded this program since 2007. This agreement would run until December 31' which is the end of a semester to better manage the program. The Board of Directors of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation recommended approval during their July 13, 2017 meeting. The Type A Board approved the grant at their September 18, 2017 meeting. Texas A&M University Internship Progress Report 2008-2016 Year # of F/T Jobs Created # of P/T Interns Placed # of lnterns Placed # of Employers unduplicated 2008-2009 10 1 66 25 2009-2010 6 0 84 20 2010-2011 15 9 102 27 2011-2012 8 19 111 28 2012-2013 8 5 115 28 2013-2014 28 12 85 36 2014-2015 15 15 87 30 2015-2016 7 8 88 30 2016-2017 75 22 2008-2016 97 69 803 246 ALTERNATIVES: The Council may choose to not fund the program or fund it at a different amount. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This is in keeping with the stated goal of promoting and retaining businesses. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017- 2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year (Fiscal Year 2018) Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 150,000 150,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 150,000 150,000 BALANCE 0 0 Fund: Type A Fund Comments: This item was approved in the Type A Small Business Fiscal Year 2018 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving an agreement for TAMU-CC for $150,000 for the internship program for calendar year 2018. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Agreement Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION Approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC) to provide grant up to $150,000 for their internship program to assist small businesses. WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Type A Corporation") has budgeted funds to assist businesses create or retain jobs in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"); WHEREAS, the Type A Corporation has requested proposals from businesses that will create or retain jobs within the City, and determined that the proposal from TAMU-CC for an intern program within the City will best satisfy this goal; and WHEREAS, City Council deems that it is in the best interest of the City and citizens to approve the business incentives agreement for an intern program between the Type A Corporation and TAMU-CC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the business incentives agreement for business development between the Type A Corporation and TAMU-CC for an intern program within the City of Corpus Christi, in the form attached to this resolution, is approved. This resolution takes effect upon City Council approval on this the day of , 2017. @BCL©280E4A0B.docx Page 2of2 ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey -Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn @BCL©280E4A0B.docx SMALL BUSINESS INCENTIVES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY - CORPUS CHRISTI FOR AN INTERN PROGRAM TO SUPPORT SMALL BUSINESSES This Small Business Incentives Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and Texas A & M University Corpus Christi, a Texas institution of higher education ("TAMU-CC"). WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature in Section 4A of Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Revised Civil Statutes (Development Corporation Act of 1979), now codified as Subtitle C1, Title 12, Texas Local Government Code, Section 504.002 et seq, ("the Act"), empowered local communities with the ability to adopt an optional local sales and use tax as a means of improving the economic health and prosperity of their citizens; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, residents of the City of Corpus Christi ("City") passed Proposition 2, New and Expanded Business Enterprises, which authorized the adoption of a sales and use tax for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises at the rate of one-eighth of one percent to be imposed for 15 years; WHEREAS, the 1/8th cent sales tax authorized by passage of Proposition 2 was subsequently enacted by the City Council and filed with the State Comptroller of Texas, effective April 1, 2003, to be administered by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Board; WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation exists for the purposes of encouraging and assisting entities in the creation of jobs for the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board''), on November 14, 2016, amended the Corporation's Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Type A Guidelines"), which the City Council approved on December 20, 2016; WHEREAS, Section 501.073 of The Act requires the City Council to approve all programs and expenditures of the Corporation; WHEREAS, TAMU-CC has requested business development funds from the Board to assist small businesses by providing access to students, who will serve as interns in professional level positions; WHEREAS, the small businesses will pay student interns minimum wage (currently $7.25 per hour) and TAMU-CC will match the business contribution up to $5.00 per hour. WHEREAS, the interns will be selected based on the needs of the small businesses with the goal of providing the businesses with resources that make the businesses more effective and provide growth opportunities; WHEREAS, the primary goal of the program is to provide support to small businesses in Corpus Christi that will encourage growth, retention, economic development, and job creation; WHEREAS, the goal of the project is the creation of 1 new full time job for every 10 internship positions funded (a 10% new job "return on investment"); Page 1 of 10 WHEREAS, a secondary benefit of the small business intern program is providing students real- world experience, while they are making a living wage without working extended hours and developing potential full-time employment opportunities following graduation; in consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, Corporation and TAMU-CC agree as follows: 1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement ("Effective Date") is the latest date that either party executes this Agreement. 2. Term. a. The term of this Agreement is for twelve months from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. b. This Agreement may be extended at the option of the Corporation for up to two additional one-year terms, contingent upon annual appropriation of funds and approval of the City Council. Per the guidelines, TAMU-CC must reapply every year for the grant. 3. Grant. a. The Corporation will grant TAMU-CC an incentive of up to One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), which must be used to fund up to $5.00 per hour for salary plus payroll taxes for interns during the Spring Semester of 2018, Summer Session in 2018, and the Fall Semester 2018, and the entire salary on two interns hired to help administer the program during the Fall and Spring Semesters and Summer Session. The interns will be paid $12.25 per hour, while participating in TAMU-CC's Small Business Employer Intern Program. b. The Corporation's grant conditioned upon TAMU-CC's successful completion of the terms of this Agreement. c. The Corporation's grant shall be paid in monthly installments based upon evidence of the amount paid by TAMU-CC to the small business employers during the prior month. 4. TAMU-CC's Duties and Responsibilities. a. TAMU-CC shall provide administrative oversight and direct supervision for the placement of interns in the TAMU-CC's Small Business Employer Intern Program. b. TAMU-CC shall create and maintain not less than one part-time intern (1) employment position to assist in the Small Business Employer Intern Program in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, during the term of this Agreement. The intern must be paid $12.25 per hour. c. TAMU-CC shall place, with small businesses in Corpus Christi, interns during any the academic year. (1) Since the primary goal of the TAMU-CC's Small Business Employer Intern Program is to provide support to small businesses in Corpus Christi that will encourage growth, retention, economic development, and job creation, Page 2 of 10 placements must be based on the needs of the small business with the goal of providing the business with resources that make the business more effective and provide growth opportunities for the businesses. (2) For the purpose of this section a small business may include a chambers of commerce, non-profit organizations, and other entity that will use the intern to assist existing, start-up, and home based small businesses in the City; recruit new small business to the City; assist the expansion of existing small businesses in the City; help entrepreneurs create start-up businesses; or help the owners and managers of small businesses develop their businesses. d. TAMU-CC shall ensure that the small business employer of each intern pays the student intern the minimum wage, and TAMU-CC shall match the small business employer's payments to the interns up to $5.00 per hour. e. TAMU-CC shall try to place the interns for 20 hours per week and 12 weeks per semester or summer sessions. f. TAMU-CC shall work with the small businesses that receive interns under the program to encourage the creation of permanent full-time jobs for the interns or similarly qualified individuals. 5. Job Creation/Training Qualification. a. In order to count as a created job under this Agreement, the job must pay wages at least as high as the wages required by Section 501.162 of the Act, which is the median wage of the occupation in the Corpus Christi MSA as determined by Texas Workforce Commission's Texas Industry Profiles report. b. In order to qualify for funds to provide job training under this Agreement, TAMU-CC agrees to create new jobs that pay wages at least as high as the wages required by Section 501.162 of the Act, which is the median wage of the occupation in the Corpus Christi MSA as determined by Texas Workforce Commission's Texas industry Profiles report. c. A "job" is defined in the Type A Guidelines as a full-time employee, contractor, consultant, or leased employee who has a home address in the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). d. TAMU-CC agrees to confirm and document to the Corporation that the minimum number of jobs created as a result of funding provided by this Agreement is maintained throughout the term by the Business. e. TAMU-CC agrees to provide Corporation with a sworn certificate by authorized representative of each business assisted under this Agreement certifying the number of full-time permanent employees employed by the business. f. TAMU-CC shall ensure that the Corporation is allowed reasonable access to personnel records of the businesses assisted under this Agreement. Page 31110 6. Reports and Monitoring. a. TAMU-CC shall provide a report at the end of each semester or summer session certifying the status of compliance through the life of the Agreement. Documentation for jobs may be in the form of quarterly IRS 941 returns, TAMU-CC employer Quarterly Reports, or employee rosters and other reports listed below: L number of interns ii. name of companies using interns iii. intern duties iv. whether the intern received a job at that company v. whether the intern received a job in the area. b. TAMU-CC, during normal working hours shall allow the Corporation and its designee, City of Corpus Christi Economic Development Department, reasonable access to TAMU- CC's employment records and books, to verify employment and all other relevant records related to each of the other economic development considerations and incentives, as stated in this Agreement, but the confidentiality of the records and information must be maintained by Corporation and its designee, unless such records and information shall be required by a court order, a lawfully issued subpoena, or at the direction of the Office of the Texas Attorney General. 7. Warranties. TAMU-CC warrants and represents to Corporation the following: a. TAMU-CC is a member of the Texas A&M University System, and an institution of higher education under the laws of the State of Texas. b. TAMU-CC has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the ter s of this Agreement to the best of its ability. c. TAMU-CC has timely filed and will timely file all local, State, and Federal tax reports and returns required by laws to be filed and all Texas, assessments, fees, and other governmental charges, including applicable ad valorem taxes, have been timely paid, and will be timely paid, during the term of this Agreement. d. TAMU-CC has received a copy of the Act, and acknowledges that the funds granted in this Agreement must be utilized solely for purposes authorized under State law and by the terms of this Agreement. e. The parties executing this Agreement on behalf of TAMU-CC are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of TAMU-CC. f. TAMU-CC does not and agrees that it will not knowingly employ an undocumented worker. If, after receiving payments under this Agreement, TAMU-CC is convicted of a violation under §U.S.C. Section 1324a(f), TAMU-CC shall repay the payments at the rate and according to the terms as specified by City Ordinance, as amended, not later than the 120'h day after the date TAMU-CC has been notified of the violation. 8. Compliance with Laws. TAMU-CC shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments. Page 4 of 10 9. Non -Discrimination. TAMU-CC covenants and agrees that TAMU-CC will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services at, on, or in the Facility, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 10. Force Majeure. if the Corporation or TAMU-CC is prevented, wholly or in part, from fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement by reason of any act of God, unavoidable accident, acts of enemies, fires, floods, governmental restraint or regulation, other causes of force majeure, or by reason of circumstances beyond its control, then the obligations of the Corporation or TAMU-CC are temporarily suspended during continuation of the force majeure. If either party's obligation is affected by any of the causes of force majeure, the party affected shall promptly notify the other party in writing, giving full particulars of the force majeure as soon as possible after the occurrence of the cause or causes relied upon. 11. Assignment. TAMU-CC may not assign all or any part of its rights, privileges, or duties under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the Corporation and City. Any attempted assignment without approval is void, and constitutes a breach of this Agreement. 12. Indemnity. To the extent permitted by the laws and the Constitution of the State of Texas, TAMU-CC covenants to fully indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Corporation, the City, their respective officers, employees, and agents ("indemnitees") against all liability, damage, loss, claims dernands, and actions of any kind on account of personal injuries (including, without limiting the foregoing, workers' compensation and death claims), or property loss or damage of any kind, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with, or are claimed to arise out of or be in any manner connected with TAMU- CC activities conducted under or incidental to this Agreement, including any injury, loss or damage caused by the sole or contributory negligence of any or all of the Indemnitees. TAMU-CC must, at its own expense, investigate alt those claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend all actions based on those claims and demands with counsel satisfactory to indemnitees, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other cost and expenses of any kind arising from the liability, damage, loss, claims, demands, or actions. 13. Events of Default by TAMU-CC. The following events constitute a default of this Agreement by TAMU-CC: a. The Corporation or City determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of TAMU-CC contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, certificate, report, or opinion submitted to the Corporation in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made; b. Any judgment is assessed against TAMU-CC or any attachment or other levy against the property of TAMU-CC with respect to a claim remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 120 days. c. TAMU-CC makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. d. TAMU-CC files a petition in bankruptcy, or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. Page $ of 10 e. If taxes owed by TAMU-CC become delinquent, and TAMU-CC fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. f. TAMU-CC changes the general character of business as conducted as of the date this Agreement is approved by the Corporation. 14. Notice of Default. Should the Corporation or City determine that TAMU-CC is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the Corporation or City shall notify TAMU-CC in writing of the event of default and provide 60 days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period") for TAMU- CC to cure the event of default. 15. Results of Uncured Default by TAMU-CC. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the cure Period, and taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of TAMU-CC, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the following actions must be taken for any default that remains uncured after the Cure Period. a. TAMU-CC shall immediately repay all funds paid by Corporation to them under this Agreement. b. To the extent permitted by the laws and Constitution of the State of Texas, TAMU-CC shall pay Corporation reasonable attorney fees and costs of court to collect amounts due to Corporation if not immediately repaid upon demand from the Corporation. c. Upon payment by TAMU-CC of all sums due, the Corporation and TAMU-CC shall have no further obligations to one another under this Agreement. d. Neither the City, the Corporation, nor TAMU-CC may be held liable for any consequential damages. 16. No Waiver. a. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition of the Agreement. b. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. c. Any waiver or indulgence of TAMU-CC's default may not be considered an estoppel against the Corporation. d. It is expressly understood that if at any time TAMU-CC is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the Corporation to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the Corporation may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the Corporation, but Corporation may at any time avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. Page 6 of 10 17. TAMU-CC specifically agrees that Corporation shall only be liable to TAMU-CC for the actual amount of the money grants to be conveyed to TAMU-CC, and shall not be liable to TAMU-CC for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees, or cost of court for any act of default by Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. Payment by Corporation is strictly limited to those funds so allocated, budgeted, and collected solely during the grant term of this Agreement. Corporation shall use its best efforts to anticipate economic conditions and to budget accordingly. However, it is further understood and agreed that, should the actual total sales tax revenue collected for any one year be less than the total amount of grants to be paid to all contracting parties with Corporation for that year, then in that event, all contracting parties shall receive only their pro rata share of the available sales tax revenue for that year, less Corporation's customary and usual costs and expenses, as compared to each contracting parties' grant amount for that year, and Corporation shall not be liable to for any deficiency at that time or at any time in the future. In this event, Corporation will provide all supporting documentation, as requested. Payments to be made shall also require a written request from TAMU-CC to be accompanied by ail necessary supporting documentation. 18. The parties mutually agree and understand that funding under this Agreement is subject to annual appropriations by the City Council; that each fiscal year's funding must be included in the budget for that year; and the funding is not effective until approved by the City Council. 19. Notices. a. Any required written notices shall be sent mailed, certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: TAMU-CC: Texas A & M University — Corpus Christi Attn: Director of Contracts & Property 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5731 Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5731 contracts@TAMU-CC.edu Corporation: City of Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Attn.: Executive Director 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 b. A copy of all notices and correspondence must be sent the City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn.: City Manager P.O. ox 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 c. Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. Page 7 of 10 20. Incorporation of other documents. The Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Corporation Guidelines"), as amended, are incorporated into this Agreement. 21. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign Agreements on behalf of each party. 22. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the Corporation and TAMU-CC will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint -venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. 23. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 24. Severability. a. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. b. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 25. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Nueces County, Texas. 26. Governing Law. The validity of this Agreement and all matters pertaining thereto, including but not limited to, matters of performance, non-performance, breach, remedies, procedures, rights, duties, and interpretation or construction, shall be governed and determined by the Constitution and the laws of the state of Texas. 27. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole Agreement between Corporation and TAMU-CC. Any prior Agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 28. Survival of terms of Agreement and obligations of parties. The terms of this Agreement and the obligation of the parties relating to Section 14.a and b shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Page 8 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM: day of , 2017. Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Corpus Christi Business & Job Development Corporation By: Date: Attest: By: Bart Braselton President Rebecca Huerta Assistant Secretary Page 9 of 10 Texas A & M University — Corpus Christi •• By: Kelly M Quintanilla, Ph.D. President / CEO Date: 9• THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES This instrument was acknowledged before me on September , 2017, by Kelly Quintanilla, Ph.D., into President/CEO, Texas A & M University -- Corpus Christi, a Texas institution of higher education, on behalf of the University. PEGGY GAFFNEY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Juno 22, 2019 Page 10 of 10 Nam My Commission AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 4, 2017 TO: Margie Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Culbertson (361) 882-7448 mculbertson@ccredc.com Small Business Agreement for LiftFund, Inc. CAPTION: Resolution to approve the Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and LiftFund, Inc. (LiftFund) to provide a grant up to $250,000 for their loan buy -down program to assist small business. PURPOSE: Approve a Type A Grant for LiftFund for their loan buy -down program for fiscal year 2018 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: LiftFund, Inc. supports small and start-up companies with a loan interest buy -down program when traditional financing is not available. Type A has provided funding since 2004. LiftFund has loaned over $7 million of their own funds and has assisted over 250 small businesses in the city since the inception of this program. The Board of Directors of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation recommended approval during their July 13, 2017 meeting. The Type A Board approved the grant at their September 18, 2017 meeting. The current agreement will buy down the interest to 5.5%. LiftFund asked that the interest could be bought down to 0% for those businesses that take out loans to deal with Hurricane Harvey damage. ALTERNATIVES: Enlist local banks to lend to small businesses. However to qualify for this program, small businesses must have been turned down for a bank loan. Additionally local banks already participate in the Small Business Administration (SBA) loan program. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: By helping small businesses the City is increasing the economic development and growing future jobs. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This project is consistent with the City's stated goals of promoting economic development and assisting small businesses thrive in Corpus Christi. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017- 2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 250,000 250,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 250,000 250,000 BALANCE 0 0 Fund: 1140 Type A Small Projects Comments: This item was approved in the Type A Small Business budget RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an agreement for LiftFund for $250,000for the fiscal year 2018. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Agreement Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION Approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and LiftFund, Inc. (LiftFund) to provide grant up to $250,000 for their loan buy -down program to assist small businesses. WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Type A Corporation") has budgeted funds to assist businesses create or retain jobs in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"). WHEREAS, the Type A Corporation has requested proposals from businesses that will create or retain jobs within the City, and determined that the proposal from LiftFund for a loan buy -down program within the City will best satisfy this goal; WHEREAS, City Council deems that it is the best interest of the City and citizens to approve the business incentives agreement for a loan buy -down program between the Type A Corporation and LiftFund; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the business incentives agreement for business development between the Type A Corporation and LiftFund for a loan buy -down program within the City of Corpus Christi, which agreement is attached to this resolution, is approved. This resolution takes effect upon City Council approval on this the day of , 2017. @BCL@500E1 EBD.docx Page 2of2 ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Mayor McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel @BCL@500E1 EBD.docx SMALL BUSINESS INCENTIVES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND LIFTFUND, INC. FOR AN INTEREST BUY DOWN PROGRAM FOR SMALL BUSINESSES This Small Businesses Incentives Agreement for an Interest Buy Down Program for Small Businesses ("Agreement") is entered into between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and LiftFund, Inc., a Texas nonprofit corporation ("LiftFund"). WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature in Section 4A of Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Revised Civil Statutes (Development Corporation Act of 1979), now codified as Subtitle C1, Title 12, Texas Local Government Code, Section 504.002 et seq, ("the Act"), empowered local communities with the ability to adopt an optional local sales and use tax as a means of improving the economic health and prosperity of their citizens; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, residents of the City of Corpus Christi ("City") passed Proposition 2, New and Expanded Business Enterprises, which authorized the adoption of a sales and use tax for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises at the rate of one-eighth of one percent to be imposed for 15 years; WHEREAS, the 1/8th cent sales tax authorized by passage of Proposition 2 was subsequently enacted by the City Council and filed with the State Comptroller of Texas, effective April 1, 2003, to be administered by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Board; WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation exists for the purposes of encouraging and assisting entities in the creation of jobs for the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board"), on November 14, 2016, amended the Corporation's Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Type A Guidelines"), which the City Council approved on December 20, 2016; WHEREAS, Section 501.073 of The Act requires the City Council to approve all programs and expenditures of the Corporation; WHEREAS, LiftFund is a Texas nonprofit corporation whose principal mission is to provide loans to small business owners lacking access to commercial credit; WHEREAS, LiftFund anticipates, over the next twelve months, providing interest buy down to 5.5% for approximately 60 loans with an average value of $25,000 to low and moderate income micro and small business owners in Corpus Christi to generate 20 new permanent full-time jobs; WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas that business development funds be provided to LiftFund, through this contract with LiftFund, to be used by LiftFund to buy down the interest on commercial loans to 5.5% interest for small businesses, and 0% interest on loans for small businesses related to recovery from damage caused by the recent hurricane, and establish a small business grant program, both of which will result in creation of new full-time permanent jobs in the city of Corpus Christi. In consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, Corporation and LiftFund agree as follows: Page 1 of 12 Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC 1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement ("Effective Date") is the latest date that either party executes this Agreement. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement is for one year from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018. This Agreement may be extended at the option of the Corporation for up to two additional one year terms, contingent upon annual appropriation of funds and approval of the City Council. Per the guidelines, LiftFund must reapply every year for the grant. 3. Loan Loss Reserve Program. a. The Corporation has previously provided $75,000 for the Loan Loss Reserve Program. b. The Loan Loss Reserve Program funds will be used to allow LiftFund to leverage additional capital for small business loans. c. "Small business" is defined in the Corpus Christi Business & Job Development Corporation Guidelines & Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Corporation Guidelines). d. LiftFund anticipates that it will have one million dollars available on an annual basis to be lent to qualifying small businesses in Corpus Christi. e. For every $50,000 in loans that LiftFund provides to a small business in Corpus Christi, LiftFund shall ensure that the loan will result in the creation of one new full-time permanent job in the city of Corpus Christi. f. Businesses assisted must be located in or locating within the city limits of Corpus Christi, Texas. g. Businesses assisted must be unable to obtain a loan from traditional lending institutions. h. Loan amounts shall be within the range of $5,000 to $75,000. i. LiftFund shall provide the Corporation with quarterly reports to identify the loans made, name and address of business receiving loan, jobs created, and other reports as requested by the Corporation. j. LiftFund shall provide the corporation with quarterly reports of capital available for loans to qualified Corpus Christi small businesses or qualified small businesses locating to Corpus Christi. k. LiftFund will provide funds for operations and loan capital to implement and sustain the program. 4. Interest Buy Down Program. a. In consideration for creation and maintenance of new jobs as provided in this Agreement, the Corporation agrees to pay LiftFund up to $200,000 for the Interest Buy -Down Program as follows: Page 2 of 12 Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC i. LiftFund must first receive a request for a loan from a small business or start-up company that has the ability to produce jobs in the future and is located in Corpus Christi or will be locating in Corpus Christi ("Business") ii. The request from the applicant must include a notarized affidavit stating that they have applied for normal financing from a bank, or similar lending institution, and have been denied a loan. iii. LiftFund shall review the request for a loan from the Business. iv. Upon LiftFund approval of a loan, and prior to the closing of the loan, LiftFund shall submit Attachment "A" to the Corporation requesting funds to buy down the interest rate from the interest rate allowable per the underwriting criteria to 5.5% or 0% interest for loans related to recovery from damage caused by a hurricane. The Corporation authorizes an interest buy down up to 7% of the interest rate to finance the loan. Payment by Corporation shall not exceed $17,500 per loan and shall be calculated using the following formula: For Non- Hurricane Related Loans: (Loan amount x interest rate to buy down to 5.5%) / 12 = N N x number of payments=interest buy down reimbursement to LiftFund for business loan. (The number of monthly payments shall not exceed sixty (60).) Example: ($10,000 x 7%) / 12 = 58.33 58.33 x 36 = $2,100 = amount to be reimbursed to LiftFund for business loan. For Hurricane Related Loans: (Loan amount x interest rate to buy down to 0.0%) / 12 = N N x number of payments=interest buy down reimbursement to LiftFund for business loan. (The number of monthly payments shall not exceed sixty (60)) Example: ($10,000 x 12.5%) / 12 = 104.16 $104.16 x 36 = $3,750 = amount to be reimbursed to LiftFund for business loan. v. The Corporation shall provide a response to approve or deny the reimbursement for the Interest Buy Down Program funds to LiftFund within 2 business days of receipt of Attachment "A." The Corporation shall reimburse funds within 30 days after evidence of closing the loan is submitted. vi. The total funds available on an annual basis under the Interest Buy Down Program under this agreement are $200,000. Agreement LittFund 2017-2018CC Page 3 of 12 b. The loans assisted with the program must be within the range of $5,000 to $75,000. c. This program must result in the creation of one permanent full-time job per every loan of at least $50,000 assisted with the Interest Buy Down Program. LiftFund shall ensure that the loan will result in the creation of one new full-time permanent job in the city of Corpus Christi. d. Businesses assisted through this program must be: i. A start-up or existing small business that is unable to obtain a loan from a traditional financial institution or unable to qualify for the total needed for a business loan through a bank or credit union, in which case LiftFund can loan the remaining amount with the buy down interest rate program in conjunction with the banklcredit union. ii. An existing small business that needs assistance to expand. iii. Any business assisted under the provisions of paragraphs 1 or ii of this subsection, must be: A. Located in or locating in Corpus Christi city limits. B. Current on payment of all sales taxes. C. Current on payment of all ad valorem taxes in the City of Corpus Christi. e. The following projects are ineligible for this program: i. Refinancing of existing loans or debt ii. Businesses located outside the Corpus Christi city limits iii. Home-based businesses iv. Loans to existing businesses which are not planning on expanding v. Business retention. f. LiftFund may use up to $200,000 to assist start-up and existing small businesses that have little or no access to traditional credit. g. LiftFund shall provide the Corporation with quarterly reports as provided in Attachment "B" to identify the loans made, name and address of the business receiving the loan, jobs created under the Interest Buy Down Program, and other reports as requested by the Corporation. h. LiftFund shall provide funds for operations and loan capital to implement and sustain the program. i. LiftFund shall develop loan underwriting criteria and payment terms and conditions for its loan program and provide to the Corporation. Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC Page 4 of 12 j. At the termination of this agreement and after repayment or other conclusion of all loans assisted by Interest Buy Down Program, LiftFund will return to the Corporation any unexpended funds remaining from the Loan Loss Reserve Program. 5. Small Business Grant Program. a. In consideration for creation and maintenance of new jobs as provided in this Agreement, the Corporation agrees to pay LiftFund up to $50,000 for the Small Business Grant Program as follows: i. Grants to loan applicants who do not meet standard underwriting criteria, either because of capacity, cash flow, or credit, who could benefit from a grant to boost their ability to become successful. The grant amount may not exceed $2,500 or 10% of the principal amount requested, whichever is less. ii. Grants to loan applicants who want to use part of loan proceeds to reduce energy consumption or transition into green retail products. The grant amount may not exceed $2,500 or 25% of the upgrades presented in the loan file. iii. Grants to loan applicants who provide services for working families (e.g. both children and adult day care centers) to improve their facilities to be compliant with state/federal standards. The grant amount may not exceed $2,500. iv. Grants to loan applicants that are veteran owned businesses. The grant amount may not exceed $500. v. Working capital grants to holders of existing loans with LiftFund. If the loans that have paid routinely on time for a period of 24 months, the maximum grant amount may not exceed $1,000. If the loans have been paid routinely on time for a period of 12 months on time payments, the maximum grant amount may not exceed $500 grant. b. The loans assisted with the program must be within the range of $500 to $25,000. c. This program must result in the creation of one permanent full-time job per every related loan of at least $50,000 assisted through the Interest Buy Down Program. LiftFund shall ensure that the loans will result in the creation of one new full-time permanent job in the city of Corpus Christi. d. Businesses assisted through this program must be: i. A start-up or existing small business that is unable to obtain a loan from a traditional financial institution or unable to qualify for the total needed for a business loan through a bank or credit union, in which case LiftFund can loan the remaining amount with the Buy Down interest rate program in conjunction with the banklcredit union. 11 An existing small business that needs assistance to expand. iii. Any business assisted under the provisions of paragraphs i or ii of this subsection, must be: Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC Page 5 of 12 A. Located in or locating in Corpus Christi city limits. B. Current on payment of all sales taxes. C. Current on payment of all ad valorem taxes in the City of Corpus Christi, e. The following projects are ineligible for this program: i. Businesses located outside the Corpus Christi city limits ii. Home-based businesses located outside the Corpus Christi city limits iii. Grants to existing businesses which are not planning on expanding f. LiftFund shall provide the Corporation with quarterly reports as provided in Attachment "B" to identify the grants made, name and address of the business receiving the grant, jobs created under the related Interest Buy Down Program, and other reports as requested by the Corporation. g. LiftFund shall provide funds to implement and sustain the program. h. LiftFund shall develop grant award criteria and payment terms and conditions for the grant loan program, and must provide copies of the criteria, terms, and conditions to the Corporation. i. At the termination of this agreement or other conclusion of the Small Business Grant Program, LiftFund shall return to the Corporation any unexpended funds remaining from the Small Business Grant Program. 6. Job Creation Qualification. a. In order to count as a created job under this Agreement, the job must pay wages at least as high as the median wage of the occupation in the Corpus Christi MSA as determined by Texas Workforce Commission's Texas Industry Profiles report. b. A 'job" is defined in the Type A Guidelines as a full-time employee, contractor, consultant, or leased employee who has a home address in the Corpus Christi MSA. c. LiftFund agrees to confirm and document to the Corporation that each job created as a result of funding provided by this Agreement is maintained throughout the term of the loan to the Business. d. LiftFund agrees to provide Corporation with a sworn certificate by authorized representative of each shall business assisted under this Agreement certifying the number of full-time permanent employees employed by the small business. e. LiftFund shall ensure that the Corporation is allowed reasonable access to personnel records of the small businesses assisted under this Agreement. 7. Buy Local Provision. Page 6 of 12 Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC a. LiftFund agrees to use its best efforts to give preference and priority to local manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, and labor, except where not reasonably possible to do so without added expense, substantial inconvenience, or sacrifice in operating efficiency. b. For the purposes of this section, the term "local° as used to describe manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, and labor includes firms, businesses, and persons who reside in or maintain an office within a 50 mile radius of Nueces County. 8. Local Offices. Two staff persons of LiftFund offices shall be located in Corporation designated offices or a mutually agreeable location. 9. Representation on LiftFund governing board. LiftFund agrees to appoint a person designated by the Corporation as a member of LiftFund governing board. 10. Warranties. LiftFund warrants and represents to Corporation the following: a. LiftFund is a corporation duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas, and further has all corporate power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted in Corpus Christi, Texas. b. LiftFund has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the terms of this Agreement. c. LiftFund has timely filed and will timely file all local, State, and Federal tax reports and returns required by laws to be filed and all Texas, assessments, fees, and other governmental charges, including applicable ad valorem taxes, have been timely paid, and will be timely paid, during the term of this Agreement. d. LiftFund has received a copy of the Act and acknowledges that the funds granted in this Agreement must be utilized solely for purposes authorized under State law and by the terms of this Agreement. e. If an audit determines that the funds were not used for authorized purposes, LiftFund agrees to reimburse Corporation for the sums of money spent for purposes not authorized by law within 30 days written notice requesting reimbursement. f. The parties executing this Agreement on behalf of LiftFund are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of LiftFund. g. LiftFund does not and agrees that it will not knowingly employ an undocumented worker. If, after receiving payments under this Agreement, LiftFund is convicted of a violation under §U.S.C. Section 1324a(f), LiftFund shall repay the payments at the rate and according to the terms as specified by City Ordinance, as amended, not later than the 120t day after the date LiftFund has been notified of the violation. 11. Compliance with Laws. LiftFund shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments. 12. Non -Discrimination. LiftFund covenants and agrees that LiftFund will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the Agreement LiftFund 2017-20113CC Page 7 of 12 provision of services at, on, or in the Facility, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 13. Force Majeure. If the Corporation or LiftFund is prevented, wholly or in part, from fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement by reason of any act of God, unavoidable accident, acts of enemies, fires, floods, governmental restraint or regulation, other causes of force majeure, or by reason of circumstances beyond its control, then the obligations of the Corporation or LiftFund are temporarily suspended during continuation of the force majeure. If either party's obligation is affected by any of the causes of force majeure, the party affected shall promptly notify the other party in writing, giving full particulars of the force majeure as soon as possible after the occurrence of the cause or causes relied upon. 14. Assignment. LiftFund may not assign all or any part of its rights, privileges, or duties under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the Corporation and City. Any attempted assignment without approval is void, and constitutes a breach of this Agreement. 15. indemnity. LiftFund covenants to fully indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Corporation, the City, their respective officers, employees, and agents ('Indemnitees") against all liability, damage, loss, claims demands, and actions of any kind on account of personal injuries (including, without limiting the foregoing, workers' compensation and death claims), or property Loss or damage of any kind, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with, or are claimed to arise out of or be in any manner connected with LiftFund activities conducted under or incidental to this Agreement, including any injury, loss or damage caused by the sole or contributory negligence of any or all of the Indemnitees. LiftFund must, at its own expense, investigate all those claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend all actions based on those claims and demands with counsel satisfactory to Indemnitees, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other cost and expenses of any kind arising from the liability, damage, Loss, claims, demands, or actions. 16. Events of Default. The following events constitute a default of this Agreement: a. Failure of LiftFund to timely, fully, and completely comply with any one or more of the requirements, obligations, duties, terms, conditions, or warranties of this Agreement. b. The Corporation or City determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of LiftFund contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, certificate, report, or opinion submitted to the Corporation in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made. c. Any judgment is assessed against LiftFund or any attachment or other levy against the property of LiftFund with respect to a claim remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 30 days. d. LiftFund makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. e. LiftFund files a petition in bankruptcy, or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. f. if taxes owed by LiftFund become delinquent, and LiftFund fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC Page 8 of 12 g. LiftFund changes the general character of business as conducted of the date this Agreement is approved by the Corporation. 17. Notice of Default. Should the Corporation or City determine that LiftFund is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the Corporation or City shall notify LiftFund in writing of the event of default and provide 60 days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period") for LiftFund to cure the event of default. 18. Results of Uncured Default. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the cure Period, and taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of LiftFund, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the following actions must be taken for any default that remains uncured after the Cure Period. a. LiftFund shall immediately repay all funds paid by Corporation under this Agreement. b. LiftFund shall pay Corporation reasonable attorney fees and costs of court to collect amounts due to Corporation. c. The Corporation shall have no further obligations to LiftFund under this Agreement. d. Neither the City nor the Corporation may be held liable for any consequential damages. e. The Corporation may pursue all remedies available under law. 19. No Waiver. a. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition of the Agreement. b. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. c. Any waiver or indulgence of LiftFund' default may not be considered an estoppel against the Corporation. d. It is expressly understood that if at any time LiftFund is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the Corporation to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the Corporation may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the Corporation, but Corporation may at any time avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. 20. LiftFund specifically agrees that Corporation shall only be liable to LiftFund for the actual amount of the money grants to be conveyed to LiftFund, and shall not be liable to LiftFund for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees, or cost of court for any act of default by Corporation under the terms of this agreement. Payment by Corporation is strictly limited to those funds so allocated, budgeted, and collected solely during the grant term of this agreement, being October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018. Corporation shall use its best efforts to anticipate economic conditions and to budget accordingly. However, it is further understood and agreed that, should the actual total sales tax revenue collected for any one year Page 9 of 12 Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC be less than the total amount of grants to be paid to all contracting parties with Corporation for that year, then in that event, all contracting parties shall receive only their pro rata share of the available sales tax revenue for that year, less Corporation's customary and usual costs and expenses, as compared to each contracting parties' grant amount for that year, and Corporation shall not be liable to for any deficiency at that time or at any time in the future. In this event, Corporation will provide all supporting documentation, as requested. Payments to be made shall also require a written request from LiftFund to be accompanied by all necessary supporting documentation. 21. Notices. a. Any required written notices shall be sent mailed, certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: LiftFund: LiftFund, Inc. Attn.: Janie Barrera 2007 West Martin Street San Antonio, Texas 78207 Corporation: City of Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Attn.: Executive Director 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 b. A copy of all notices and correspondence must be sent the City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn.: City Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 c. Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 22. Incorporation of other documents. The Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Corporation Guidelines"), as amended, are incorporated into this Agreement. 23. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign agreements on behalf of each party. 24. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the Corporation and LiftFund will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint -venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. Page 10 of 12 Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC 25. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 26. Severability. a. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. b. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 27. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Nueces County, Texas. 28. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole agreement between Corporation and LiftFund. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 29. Survival of terms of agreement and obligations of parties. The terms of this agreement and the obligation of the parties relating to the Loan Loss Reserve Program and the Interest Buy Down Program shall survive the termination of this agreement. [The remainder of the page intentionally left blank] Agreement LiflFund 2017-201 BCC Page 11 of 12 APPROVED AS TO FORM: day of , 2017. Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Corpus Christi Business & Job Development Corporation By: Date: President Attest: By: Rebecca Huerta Assistant Secretary LiftFund, Inc. By: rile J- `ie Barrera President and Chief Executive Officer Date: A'Ot'7dfr Joy /7 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR § This instrument was acknowledged before me onAlio visr °, , 2017, by Janie Barrera, President and Chief Executive Officer for LiftFund, Inc., a Texas non-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Page 12 of 12 Agreement LiftFund 2017-2018CC MARY N EZ N ola ry PuibEl N� �rtr�IE iN o ireg Comm, Exp 05-05-2il0EC1 NO ryr 40 749,455-2 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 4, 2017 TO: Margie Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Culbertson (361) 882-7448 mculbertson@ccredc.com Grant for Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Chapter 221 CAPTION: Resolution to approve a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Chapter 221 to provide a grant up to $52,600 for their small business assistance program. PURPOSE: Approve a Type A Grant for SCORE for their small business support program for fiscal year 2018 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: SCORE has been aiding small businesses in Corpus Christi through their outreach by holding workshops on various subjects of use to the small business owner, and by providing counseling through face to face meetings and through emails. SCORE will have a contractor to coordinate the workshops and the advertising for these workshops. They have helped over 2,000 small businesses in the city each year for the past three years. SCORE has received funding since 2008. The Board approved the Small Business Assistance budget in June that included this program. The Board asked that SCORE record the number of unique business contacts in the future and that requirement has been added. The Board of Directors of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation recommended approval during their July 13, 2017 meeting. The Type A Board approved this grant at their September 18, 2017 meeting. ALTERNATIVES: The Council may choose to not fund the program or fund it at a different amount. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This project is consistent with the City's stated goals of promoting economic development and helping small businesses thrive in Corpus Christi. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017- 2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 52,600 52,600 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 52,600 52,600 BALANCE 0 0 Fund: 1140 Type A Small Projects Comments: This item was approved in the Type A Small Business budget RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an agreement for SCORE for $52,600 for the fiscal year 2018. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Agreement Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION Approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Chapter 221 to provide a grant up to $52,600 for their small business assistance program. WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Type A Corporation") has budgeted funds to assist businesses create or retain jobs in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"). WHEREAS, the Type A Corporation has requested proposals from businesses that will create or retain jobs within the City, and determined that the proposal from SCORE for their small business assistance program within the City will best satisfy this goal; WHEREAS, City Council deems that it is the best interest of the City and citizens to approve the business incentives agreement for an intern program between the Type A Corporation and SCORE; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the business incentives agreement for business development between the Type A Corporation and SCORE for a small business assistance program within the City of Corpus Christi, which agreement is attached to this resolution, is approved. This resolution takes effect upon City Council approval on this the day of , 2017. ©BC L©500EA4A1 .docx Page 2of2 ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Mayor McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Debbie Lindsey -Opel ©BC L©500EA4A1 .docx BUSINESS INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND SERVICE CORPS OF RETIRED EXECUTIVES (SCORE) CHAPTER 221 FOR JOB TRAINING This Business Incentive Agreement for Job Training ("Agreement") is entered into between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and Service Corps of Retired Executives Chapter 221 ("SCORE"), a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation. WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature in Section 4A of Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Revised Civil Statutes (Development Corporation Act of 1979), now codified as Subtitle C1, Title 12, Texas Local Government Code, Section 504.002 et seq, ("the Act"), empowered local communities with the ability to adopt an optional local sales and use tax as a means of improving the economic health and prosperity of their citizens; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, residents of the City of Corpus Christi ("City") passed Proposition 2, New and Expanded Business Enterprises, which authorized the adoption of a sales and use tax for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises at the rate of one-eighth of one percent to be imposed for 15 years; WHEREAS, the 1/8th cent sales tax authorized by passage of Proposition 2 was subsequently enacted by the City Council and filed with the State Comptroller of Texas, effective April 1, 2003, to be administered by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Board; WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business -and Job Development Corporation exists for the purposes of encouraging and assisting entities in the creation of jobs for the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board"), on November 14, 2016, amended the Corporation's Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Type A Guidelines"), which the City Council approved on December 20, 2016; WHEREAS, Section 501.073 of the Act requires the City Council to approve all programs and expenditures of the Corporation; WHEREAS, SCORE will provide assistance to small businesses, persons, and entities desiring to begin and operate a small business in Corpus Christi by mentoring clients; conducting workshops; and advising clients as to business plans, pro -forma statements, forms of business entity, financial implications of business decisions, and all other aspects of small business operations; WHEREAS, SCORE proposes to retain an executive assistant/coordinator to assist SCORE volunteers in administrating the assistance program; WHEREAS, on September 18, 2017 the Board determined that it is in the best interests of the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas that business development funds be provided to SCORE, AGREEMENT Agreement SCORE through this Agreement with SCORE, to be used by SCORE to provide assistance to small businesses. In consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, Corporation and SCORE agree as follows: 1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement ("Effective Date") is the latest date that either party executes this Agreement. 2. Term. a. The term of this Agreement is for one year from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018. b. This Agreement may be extended at the option of the Corporation for up to two additional one year terms, contingent upon annual appropriation of funds and approval of the City Council. Per the guidelines, SCORE must reapply every year for the grant. 3. Performance Requirements and Grants. The Performance Requirements and Grants are listed below; • Corporation will reimburse SCORE by grant for all direct expenses related to the project. The total reimbursements may not exceed Fifty -Two Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($52,600.00). • Providing 1,620 hours of general and technical services to small businesses through volunteer counselors. • SCORE agrees to the following reporting and monitoring provisions, and failure to fully and timely comply with any one requirement is an act of default. • SCORE shall provide quarterly reports on its performance requirements. The reports must document: a. Number of face to face consultations between SCORE volunteers and small business owners or prospective owners. b. Number of workshops with description of workshop and number of attendees. c. Number of small business owners or prospective owners who were provided counseling by email or on-line services. • SCORE, during normal working hours, at its Corpus Christi, Texas, facility, shall allow Corporation and its designee, the City's Economic Development Department (Department"), reasonable access to SCORE's employment records and books, to verify employment and all other relevant records related to each of the other economic development considerations and incentives, as stated in this agreement, but the confidentiality of records and information shall be maintained by Corporation and Department, unless the records and information shall be required by a court order, a lawfully issued subpoena, or at the direction of the Office of the Texas Attorney General. 4. Utilization of Local Contractors and Suppliers. SCORE agrees to exercise reasonable efforts in utilizing local contractors and suppliers in the construction of the Project, except where not reasonably possible to do so without added expense, substantial inconvenience, or sacrifice in operating efficiency in the normal course of business, with a goal of 50% of the total dollar amount of all construction contracts and supply agreements being paid to local contractors and suppliers. For the purposes of this section, the term "local" as used to describe manufacturers, 2 suppliers, contractors, and labor includes firms, businesses, and persons who reside in or maintain an office within a 50 mile radius of Nueces County. SCORE agrees, during the construction of the Project and for four years after Completion, to maintain written records documenting the efforts of SCORE to comply with the Local Requirement, and to provide an annual report to the City Manager or designee, from which the City Manager or designee shall determine if SCORE is in compliance with this requirement. Failure to substantially comply with this requirement, in the sole determination of the City Manager or designee, shall be a default hereunder. 5. Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises ("DBE'). SCORE agrees to exercise reasonable efforts in utilizing contractors and suppliers that are determined to be disadvantaged business enterprises, including minority business enterprises women -owned business enterprises and historically -underutilized business enterprises. In order to qualify as a business enterprise under this provision, the firm must be certified by the City, the Regional Transportation Authority or another governmental entity in the jurisdiction of the home office of the business as complying with state or federal standards for qualification as such an enterprise. SCORE agrees to a goal of 30% of the total dollar amount of all construction contracts and supply agreements being paid to disadvantaged business enterprises, with a priority made for disadvantaged business enterprises which are local. SCORE agrees, during the construction of the Project and for four years after Completion, to maintain written records documenting the efforts of SCORE to comply with the DBE Requirement, and to provide an annual report to the City Manager or designee, from which the City Manager or designee shall determine if SCORE is in compliance with this requirement. Failure to substantially comply with this requirement, in the sole determination of the City Manager or designee, shall be a default hereunder. For the purposes of this section, the term "local" as used to describe contractors and suppliers that are determined to be disadvantaged business enterprises, including minority business enterprises women -owned business enterprises and historically -underutilized business enterprises includes firms, businesses, and persons who reside in or maintain an office within a 50 mile radius of Nueces County. 6. Living Wage Requirement. In order to count as a permanent full-time job under this agreement, the job should provide a "living wage" for the employee. The target living wage under this agreement is that annual amount equal or greater than poverty level for a family of three, established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines, divided by 2,080 hours per year for that year. 7. Health Insurance. To qualify for this incentive, an employer shall certify that it has offered a health insurance program for its employees during the term of the Agreement. 8. Warranties. SCORE warrants and represents to Corporation the following: a. SCORE is a corporation duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas, has all corporate power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted in Corpus Christi, Texas. 3 b. SCORE has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the terms of this Agreement to the best of its ability. c. SCORE has timely filed and will timely file all local, State, and Federal tax reports and returns required by laws to be filed and all Texas, assessments, fees, and other governmental charges, including applicable ad valorem taxes, have been timely paid, and will be timely paid , during the term of this Agreement. d. SCORE has received a copy of the Act, and acknowledges that the funds granted in this Agreement must be utilized solely for purposes authorized under State law and by the terms of this Agreement. e. The person executing this Agreement on behalf of SCORE is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of SCORE. f. SCORE does not and agrees that it will not knowingly employ an undocumented worker. If, after receiving payments under this Agreement, SCORE is convicted of a violation under §U.S.C. Section 1324a(f), SCORE shall repay the payments received under this Agreement to the City, with interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, not later than the 120th day after the date SCORE has been notified of the violation. 9. Compliance with Laws. During the Term of this Agreement, SCORE shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments. 10. Non -Discrimination. SCORE covenants and agrees that SCORE will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services at, on, or in the Facility, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 11. Force Majeure. If the Corporation or SCORE is prevented, wholly or in part, from fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement by reason of any act of God, unavoidable accident, acts of enemies, fires, floods, governmental restraint or regulation, other causes of force majeure, or by reason of circumstances beyond its control, then the obligations of the Corporation or SCORE are temporarily suspended during continuation of the force majeure. If either party's obligation is affected by any of the causes of force majeure, the party affected shall promptly notify the other party in writing, giving full particulars of the force majeure as soon as possible after the occurrence of the cause or causes relied upon. 12. Assignment. SCORE may not assign all or any part of its rights, privileges, or duties under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the Corporation and City. Any attempted assignment without approval is void, and constitutes a breach of this Agreement. 4 13. Indemnity. SCORE covenants to fully indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Corporation, the City, their respective officers, employees, and agents ("Indemnitees") against all liability, damage, loss, claims demands, and actions of any kind on account of personal injuries (including, without limiting the foregoing, workers' compensation and death claims), or property loss or damage of any kind, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with, or are claimed to arise out of or be in any manner connected with SCORE activities conducted under or incidental to this Agreement, including any injury, loss or damage caused by the sole or contributory negligence of any or all of the Indemnitees. SCORE must, at its own expense, investigate all those claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend all actions based on those claims and demands with counsel satisfactory to Indemnitees, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other cost and expenses of any kind arising from the liability, damage, loss, claims, demands, or actions. 14. Events of Default by SCORE. The following events constitute a default of this Agreement by SCORE: a. The Corporation or City determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of SCORE contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, certificate, report, or opinion submitted to the Corporation in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made; b. Any judgment is assessed against SCORE or any attachment or other levy against the property of SCORE with respect to a claim remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 120 days. c. SCORE makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. d. SCORE files a petition in bankruptcy, or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. e. If taxes owed by SCORE become delinquent, and SCORE fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. f. SCORE changes the general character of business as conducted as of the date this Agreement is approved by the Corporation. g. SCORE fails to comply with one or more terms of this Agreement. 15. Notice of Default. Should the Corporation or City determine that SCORE is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the Corporation or City shall notify SCORE in writing of the event of default and provide 60 days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period) for SCORE to cure the event of default. 16. Results of Uncured Default by SCORE. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the Cure Period, and taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of SCORE, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the following actions must be taken for any default that remains uncured after the Cure Period. a. SCORE shall immediately repay all funds paid by Corporation to them under this Agreement. b. SCORE shall pay Corporation reasonable attorney fees and costs of court to collect amounts due to Corporation if not immediately repaid upon demand from the Corporation. c. Upon payment by SCORE of all sums due, the Corporation and SCORE shall have no further obligations to one another under this Agreement. 17. No Waiver. a. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition of the Agreement. b. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. c. Any waiver or indulgence of SCORE's default may not be considered an estoppel against the Corporation. d. It is expressly understood that if at any time SCORE is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the Corporation to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the Corporation may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the Corporation, but Corporation may at any time avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. 18. SCORE specifically agrees that Corporation shall only be liable to SCORE for the actual amount of the money grants to be conveyed to SCORE, and shall not be liable to SCORE for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees, or cost of court for any act of default by Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. Payment by Corporation is strictly limited to those funds so allocated, budgeted, and collected solely during the grant term of this Agreement. Corporation shall use its best efforts to anticipate economic conditions and to budget accordingly. However, it is further understood and agreed that, should the actual total sales tax revenue collected for any one year be less than the total amount of 6 grants to be paid to all contracting parties with Corporation for that year, then in that event, all contracting parties shall receive only their pro rata share of the available sales tax revenue for that year, less Corporation's customary and usual costs and expenses, as compared to each contracting parties' grant amount for that year, and Corporation shall not be liable to for any deficiency at that time or at any time in the future. In this event, Corporation will provide all supporting documentation, as requested. Payments to be made shall also require a written request from SCORE to be accompanied by all necessary supporting documentation. 19. The parties mutually agree and understand that funding under this Agreement is subject to annual appropriations by the City Council; that each fiscal year's funding must be included in the budget for that year; and the funding is not effective until approved by the City Council. 20. Notices. a. Any required written notices shall be sent mailed, certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: SCORE Chapter 221: SCORE 221 Chapter Chair 2820 South Padre Island Drive Suite 108 Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 Corporation: City of Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Attn.: Executive Director 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 b. A copy of all notices and correspondence must be sent the City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn.: City Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 c. Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 21. Incorporation of other documents. The Type A Guidelines, as amended, are incorporated into this Agreement. 7 22. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign Agreements on behalf of each party. 23. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the Corporation and SCORE will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint -venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. 24. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 25. Severability. a. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. b. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 26. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Nueces County, Texas. 27. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole Agreement between Corporation and SCORE. Any prior Agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 28. Survival of terms of Agreement and obligations of parties. The terms of this Agreement and the obligation of the parties relating to Section 14.a and b shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8 Corpus Christi Business & Job Development Corporation By: President Date: Attest: By: Rebecca Huerta Assistant Secretary SCORE Chapter 2 1 By: Dennis Dolce President Date: 04' THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES 7 This instrument was acknowledged before me on t. , 2017, by Dennis Dolce, President for Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Chapter 221, a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public State of Texas ADELITA C CARRISALEZ Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS My Comm. Exp. 0212712018 IDI 1825564 AGREEMENT City Agreement SCORE 2017-18 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of October 10, 2017 DATE: September 11 2017 TO: Margie C, Rose, City Manager FROM: Mike Culbertson (361) 882-7448 mculbertson@ccredc.com Resolution approving Small Business Incentive for Del Mar PTAC Program CAPTION: Resolution approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Del Mar College (Del Mar) to provide a grant up to $48,490 for their Procurement Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) to assist small business. PURPOSE: Approve a Type A Grant for Del Mar for their Procurement Technical Assistance Center program for calendar year 2018. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: PTAC is located at the Del Mar College campus on Staples inside of the Small Business Development Center. PTAC has been counseling small businesses in the area of government procurement. PTAC educates these businesses on the requirements of government procurement, helps them get certified to qualify to bid on contracts, and gives them access to a portal to find these contracts. PTAC was instrumental in working with CCAD to engage small tool and die shops to bid on specialty tool orders from CCAD. PTAC is asking for $48,490 to hire a full-time person to help in the PTAC planning room. PTAC has been funded since 2014. The Board has funded PTAC since 2012. During that time PTAC has helped 276 companies. These companies have been awarded $21,904,800 in orders and they have also added 125 fulltime employees. The Board of Directors of the Corpus Christi regional Economic Development Corporation recommended approval during their July 13, 2017 meeting. The Type A Board approved the grant at their September 18, 2017 meeting. ALTERNATIVES: The Council may choose to not fund the program or fund it at a different amount. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This project is consistent with the City's stated goals of promoting economic development and helping small businesses thrive in Corpus Christi. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017- 2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year (Fiscal Year 2018) Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 48,490 48,490 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 48,490 48,490 BALANCE 0 0 Fund: 1140 Type A Small Projects Comments: This item was approved in the Type A Small Business Fiscal Year 2018 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an agreement for PTAC for $48,490 for the calendar year 2018. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Agreement Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION Approving a Small Business Incentives Agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and Del Mar College (Del Mar) to provide grant up to $48,490 for their Procurement Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) to assist small businesses. WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Type A Corporation") has budgeted funds to assist businesses create or retain jobs in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"). WHEREAS, the Type A Corporation has requested proposals from businesses that will create or retain jobs within the City, and determined that the proposal from Del Mar for their Procurement Technical Assistance Center program within the City will best satisfy this goal; and WHEREAS, City Council deems that it is in the best interest of the City and citizens to approve the business incentives agreement for a PTAC program between the Type A Corporation and Del Mar. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the business incentives agreement for business development between the Type A Corporation and Del Mar for their Procurement Technical Assistance Center program within the City of Corpus Christi, which agreement is attached to this resolution, is approved. This resolution takes effect upon City Council approval on this the day of , 2017. @BCL@280ED23B.docx Page 2of2 ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Debbie Lindsey -Opel Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn @BCL@280ED23B.docx SMALL BUSINESS INCENTIVES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND DEL MAR COLLEGE FOR DEL MAR COLLEGE'S PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER This Small Business Incentives Agreement for ("Agreement") is entered into between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and Del Mar College, a Texas institution of higher learning ("Del Mar"). WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature in Section 4A of Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Revised Civil Statutes (Development Corporation Act of 1979), now Title 12, Subtitle C1 (Chapters 501 — 507), Texas Local Government Code, empowered local communities with the ability to adopt an optional local sales and use tax as a means of improving the economic health and prosperity of their citizens; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, residents of the City of Corpus Christi ("City") passed Proposition 2, New and Expanded Business Enterprises, which authorized the adoption of a sales and use tax for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises at the rate of one-eighth of one percent to be imposed for 15 years; WHEREAS, the 1/8th cent sales tax authorized by passage of Proposition 2 was subsequently enacted by the City Council and filed with the State Comptroller of Texas, effective April 1, 2003, to be administered by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Board; WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation exists for the purposes of encouraging and assisting entities in the creation of jobs for the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board"), on November 14, 2016, amended the Corporation's Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Business Incentives ("Type A Guidelines"), which the City Council approved on December 20, 2016; WHEREAS, Section 501.073 of the Act requires the City Council to approve all programs and expenditures of the Corporation; WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the citizens of Corpus Christi, Texas that small business development funds be provided to Del Mar, through this Agreement with Del Mar, to be used by Del Mar, which seeks to create at least one new job for every $50,000 in contracts awarded to businesses within the City who are awarded contracts with Federal, State, or local agencies through Del Mar College's Procurement Technical Assistance Center's activities; In consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, Corporation and Del Mar agree as follows: 1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement ("Effective Date") is the latest date that either party executes this Agreement. 2. Term. Page 1 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx a. The term of this Agreement is for one year from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. b. This Agreement may be extended at the option of the Corporation for up to two additional one year terms, contingent upon annual appropriation of funds and approval of the City Council. 3. Performance Requirements and Grants. DEL MAR shall educate small businesses on the requirements of government procurement, help them get certified to qualify to bid on contracts, and give them access to a portal to find these contracts. The grant shall not to exceed $48,490. The Corporation will pay the grant to DEL MAR as invoices are received. DEL MAR will display signage that states that they are recipients of Type A funding. This signage will be provided to DEL MAR by the Board and will be displayed in a location that is visible to a visitor to their facility. 4. Utilization of Local Contractors and Suppliers. DEL MAR agrees to exercise reasonable efforts in utilizing local contractors and suppliers in the construction of the Project, except where not reasonably possible to do so without added expense, substantial inconvenience, or sacrifice in operating efficiency in the normal course of business, with a goal of 50% of the total dollar amount of all construction contracts and supply agreements being paid to local contractors and suppliers. For the purposes of this section, the term "local" as used to describe manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, and labor includes firms, businesses, and persons who reside in or maintain an office within a 50 mile radius of Nueces County. DEL MAR agrees, during the construction of the Project and for four years after Completion, to maintain written records documenting the efforts of DEL MAR to comply with the Local Requirement, and to provide an annual report to the City Manager or designee, from which the City Manager or designee shall determine if DEL MAR is in compliance with this requirement. Failure to substantially comply with this requirement, in the sole determination of the City Manager or designee, shall be a default hereunder. 5. Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises ("DBE"). DEL MAR agrees to exercise reasonable efforts in utilizing contractors and suppliers that are determined to be disadvantaged business enterprises, including minority business enterprises women -owned business enterprises and historically -underutilized business enterprises. In order to qualify as a business enterprise under this provision, the firm must be certified by the City, the Regional Transportation Authority or another governmental entity in the jurisdiction of the home office of the business as complying with state or federal standards for qualification as such an enterprise. DEL MAR agrees to a goal of 30% of the total dollar amount of all construction contracts and supply agreements being paid to disadvantaged business enterprises, with a priority made for disadvantaged business enterprises which are local. DEL MAR agrees, during the construction of the Project and for four years after Completion, to maintain written records documenting the efforts of DEL MAR to comply with the DBE Requirement, and to provide an annual report to the City Manager or designee, from which the City Manager or designee shall determine if DEL MAR is in compliance with this requirement. Failure to substantially comply with this requirement, in the sole determination of the City Manager or designee, shall be a default Page 2 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx hereunder. For the purposes of this section, the term "local" as used to describe contractors and suppliers that are determined to be disadvantaged business enterprises, including minority business enterprises women -owned business enterprises and historically -underutilized business enterprises includes firms, businesses, and persons who reside in or maintain an office within a 50 mile radius of Nueces County. 6. Living Wage Requirement. In order to count as a permanent full-time job under this agreement, the job should provide a "living wage" for the employee. The target living wage under this agreement is that annual amount equal or greater than poverty level for a family of three, established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines, divided by 2,080 hours per year for that year. 7. Health Insurance. To qualify for this incentive, an employer shall certify that it has offered a health insurance program for its employees during the term of the Agreement. 8. Warranties. DEL MAR warrants and represents to Corporation the following: a. Del Mar is a Texas institute of higher learning duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas, has all corporate power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted in Corpus Christi, Texas. b. DEL MAR has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the terms of this Agreement to the best of its ability. c. DEL MAR has timely filed and will timely file all local, State, and Federal tax reports and returns required by laws to be filed and all Texas, assessments, fees, and other governmental charges, including applicable ad valorem taxes, have been timely paid, and will be timely paid , during the term of this Agreement. d. DEL MAR has access to the Texas Development Corporation Act, Title 12, Subtitle C1 (Chapters 501 — 507), Texas Local Government Code, on the State's website, and acknowledges that the funds granted in this Agreement must be utilized solely for purposes authorized under State law and by the terms of this Agreement. e. The person executing this Agreement on behalf of DEL MAR is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of DEL MAR. f. DEL MAR does not and agrees that it will not knowingly employ an undocumented worker. If, after receiving payments under this Agreement, DEL MAR is convicted of a violation under §U.S.C. Section 1324a(f), DEL MAR shall repay the payments received under this Agreement to the City, with interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, not later than the 120th day after the date DEL MAR has been notified of the violation. Page 3 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx 9. Compliance with Laws. During the Term of this Agreement, DEL MAR shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments. 10. Non -Discrimination. DEL MAR covenants and agrees that DEL MAR will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services at, on, or in the Facility, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 11. Force Majeure. If the Corporation or DEL MAR is prevented, wholly or in part, from fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement by reason of any act of God, unavoidable accident, acts of enemies, fires, floods, governmental restraint or regulation, other causes of force majeure, or by reason of circumstances beyond its control, then the obligations of the Corporation or DEL MAR are temporarily suspended during continuation of the force majeure. If either party's obligation is affected by any of the causes of force majeure, the party affected shall promptly notify the other party in writing, giving full particulars of the force majeure as soon as possible after the occurrence of the cause or causes relied upon. 12. Assignment. DEL MAR may not assign all or any part of its rights, privileges, or duties under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the Corporation and City. Any attempted assignment without approval is void, and constitutes a breach of this Agreement. 13. Indemnity. DEL MAR covenants to fully indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Corporation, the City, their respective officers, employees, and agents ("Indemnitees") against all liability, damage, loss, claims demands, and actions of any kind on account of personal injuries (including, without limiting the foregoing, workers' compensation and death claims), or property loss or damage of any kind, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with, or are claimed to arise out of or be in any manner connected with DEL MAR activities conducted under or incidental to this Agreement, including any injury, loss or damage caused by the sole or contributory negligence of any or all of the Indemnitees. DEL MAR must, at its own expense, investigate all those claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend all actions based on those claims and demands with counsel satisfactory to Indemnitees, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other cost and expenses of any kind arising from the liability, damage, loss, claims, demands, or actions. 14. Events of Default by DEL MAR. The following events constitute a default of this Agreement by DEL MAR: a. The Corporation or City determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of DEL MAR contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, certificate, report, Page 4 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx or opinion submitted to the Corporation in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made; b. Any judgment is assessed against DEL MAR or any attachment or other levy against the property of DEL MAR with respect to a claim remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 120 days. c. DEL MAR makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. d. DEL MAR files a petition in bankruptcy, or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. e. If taxes owed by DEL MAR become delinquent, and DEL MAR fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. f. DEL MAR changes the general character of business as conducted as of the date this Agreement is approved by the Corporation. g. DEL MAR fails to comply with one or more terms of this Agreement. 15. Notice of Default. Should the Corporation or City determine that DEL MAR is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the Corporation or City shall notify DEL MAR in writing of the event of default and provide 60 days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period") for DEL MAR to cure the event of default. 16. Results of Uncured Default by DEL MAR. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the Cure Period, and taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of DEL MAR, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the following actions must be taken for any default that remains uncured after the Cure Period. a. DEL MAR shall immediately repay all funds paid by Corporation to them under this Agreement. b. DEL MAR shall pay Corporation reasonable attorney fees and costs of court to collect amounts due to Corporation if not immediately repaid upon demand from the Corporation. c. Upon payment by DEL MAR of all sums due, the Corporation and DEL MAR shall have no further obligations to one another under this Agreement. 17. No Waiver. Page 5 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx a. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition of the Agreement. b. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. c. Any waiver or indulgence of DEL MAR's default may not be considered an estoppel against the Corporation. d. It is expressly understood that if at any time DEL MAR is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the Corporation to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the Corporation may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the Corporation, but Corporation may at any time avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. 18. DEL MAR specifically agrees that Corporation shall only be liable to DEL MAR for the actual amount of the money grants to be conveyed to DEL MAR, and shall not be liable to DEL MAR for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees, or cost of court for any act of default by Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. Payment by Corporation is strictly limited to those funds so allocated, budgeted, and collected solely during the grant term of this Agreement. Corporation shall use its best efforts to anticipate economic conditions and to budget accordingly. However, it is further understood and agreed that, should the actual total sales tax revenue collected for any one year be less than the total amount of grants to be paid to all contracting parties with Corporation for that year, then in that event, all contracting parties shall receive only their pro rata share of the available sales tax revenue for that year, less Corporation's customary and usual costs and expenses, as compared to each contracting parties' grant amount for that year, and Corporation shall not be liable to for any deficiency at that time or at any time in the future. In this event, Corporation will provide all supporting documentation, as requested. Payments to be made shall also require a written request from DEL MAR to be accompanied by all necessary supporting documentation. 19. The parties mutually agree and understand that funding under this Agreement is subject to annual appropriations by the City Council; that each fiscal year's funding must be included in the budget for that year; and the funding is not effective until approved by the City Council. 20. Notices. a. Any required written notices shall be sent mailed, certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Page 6 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx Del Mar College: Del Mar College Procurement Manager 101 Baldwin Blvd Corpus Christi, Texas 78404-3897 Corporation: City of Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Attn.: Executive Director 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 b. A copy of all notices and correspondence must be sent the City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn.: City Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 c. Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 21. Incorporation of other documents. The Type A Guidelines, as amended, are incorporated into this Agreement. 22. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign Agreements on behalf of each party. 23. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the Corporation and DEL MAR will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint -venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. 24. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 25. Severability. a. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or Page 7 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. b. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 26. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Nueces County, Texas. 27. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole Agreement between Corporation and DEL MAR. Any prior Agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 28. Survival of terms of Agreement and obligations of parties. The terms of this Agreement and the obligation of the parties relating to Section 14.a and b shall survive the termination of this Agreement. (Remainder of this page intentionally left blank) Page 8 of 9 Agreement PTAC.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM: day of , 2017. Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Corpus Christi Business & Job Development Corporation By: Date: Attest: By: Bart Braselton President Rebecca Huerta Assistant Secretary Del Mar College— orpus Christi By: Dr ark Escamilla, Ph.D. esident Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES This instrument was acknowledged before me on e 12. , 2017, by Dr. Mark Escamilla, Ph.D., President, Del Mar College, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, on behalf of the college district. Notary Pu State of Texas Agreement PTAC ANGELA M. BROOKS I ' 1 Notary Public, State of Texas .* *E k f My Commission Expires ; Page 9 of 9 01/13/2018 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: September 21, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: William J. Green, P.E., Interim Director, Development Services Department BiIIG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Unified Development Code — Public and Private Improvements — Warranty Period STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position Department 1. William J. Green, P.E. Interim Director Development Services 2. Gene Delauro Interim Asst. Director/Building Official Development Services OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position Organization 1. BACKGROUND: At the April 27, 2017 City Council Workshop on New Residential Street Construction, the City Council gave a motion of direction to revise the "duration of the materials and workmanship warranty for all private and public infrastructure improvements from one to two years from the date of final (100%) acceptance". The purpose of the materials and workmanship warranty is to ensure that the developer and the developer's contractor will be responsible for defects in materials or workmanship. The proposed UDC text amendments have been approved by the Planning Commission on May 17, 2017 and was again discussed at Planning Commission meeting on June 28, 2017 for additional public input. On August 23, 2017 Planning Commission passed a motion to retain 1 - year warranty and evaluate an alternate consideration of 1 year warranty with a maintenance bond of 50% surety value of the public infrastructure contract price. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Power Point Presentation duP'u I a) 0 V a) E 0 a, a) a) Public and Private Improvements - Warranty Period April 27, 2017 City Council Workshop on New Residential Street Construction 4 E C . ca LI- pO O Z O L CC E ca 0 Lo '4•7; ca a, 0 o cv E > U `ti p O CO Z C c > ) a N O C v) +� ca ca C C ca a j 0 } E CD p v }' v ca a i E L E E E O +, U N 0 -0 C § .L U Q ate.+ L L1 N 0 C U 4., U a1 O L a o L 0.. v) O O U a1 'a v L U L U > C v) ca L1 CS LO as v) as >, U a CD - v Q rI U +�-+ p O O U v 4 \--/•N c ca OL P_) Cs `ti •E •E c ,U cu O E E E V-0 c ,� u u E qp C Q o a ' 0- -0 bO bOD O •a u a1 C C vim+ LI- D p a c o ' E = ^ L a, p p a a Q a; ra O a %-I %^i O N > O a N N a1 M CO 2 CUv aeS1 l i ca N _Q H CO v) •c� LC dA ca G N Q a1 0LI) Current Public Infrastructure Process C ° 0 0 LJU VI t ° C —5= z t (1) E (it.) E 4-4 c 0 5,— z t z t (5) 13 111 0 0 z t v) 715 45f:::: 0 lc W.: S: >,(1) ECI: , 1;22, . ni,,,'`,''3 :13 7, ,,...,. nw a.) a 7:3 no.,,1: sTsAfeuv pup uoppalloD plea 41 SO Lr') 0 (-N) CI (1) ....-.. C (1) 0 4-, 0 0 ,..... c -0 73 vi (1) C a) C 4-, 0 (1) 73 0 (A C E c CI 7.3 4-, 0 E (1) 2 " 0 0 E aj z,' u v) .4.7., -I-) 0 la 0 E aj 0 0 (1)as (1) — c (1) a) 73 0 , E 0 0 >ru 4.--- (1) In as 17-- LO > v) (..) a) a) Ln cm 0 (r) 0 — c a 7.3 7r a r---1 1 00 0 -C i N. CI 00 1 N LOv) -0 ,rHi C Lr) (1) CI (1) C C (/) (1) (1) CI 7,.. 0 4.-.7; .4.. (1) (1) .4D af) ,k -HI (1) .1..d .1...) V) a) 7r ID ID a) a) a) O cp u ID ID (1) 0 CI CL 0 s,.... (1) U U v) 9) > CL CL ar) (/) „,.0- 4-, -C > > v) -C -C 0 a) 2 la -1,-,22 v) v) a (3) (.) (1) CV nr) V) c-1 CA CV 12 a-4 " N V) V) (1) 0 IN% IN% f: "TO 5 L4 - 9L) '71Ei 4-) 4- 4- CO 0 0 (..) 4-) 4-) = = i.f) 0 (1) •J TIE) i rr) r--1 > L() CN . . . . ci. 1 faL, LC) 66 Other Municipal Public Infrastructure Policies O v O v 2 year warranty City of Fort Worth - 2 year warranty City of Garland- 2 year warranty > U }, Q) i i D D o a-+ O Q) O Q) -0 0- S- 0 i m Q) ITSU c (D S- S- CU - Q) ITS a-, S- . ITS - .( ITS 2 a) (a 1 �a 3 0 >, 4, fD -0 S- ITS ITS C ITS Q) (I) U 'i -1 Q Q) L) � U S- 4-, 4-, S- 4-, a., 1 .— ate+ u_ O .E U 0 O = Q Q) O t a+ V O Recommendations +-1 COC CU —C Cca O CU 4-1 MS CO CU ca CO 5- 5—I > co 2 4-1 O v CO4-1 C CO COC CU O CO v c O cu D. Ov O 4-14-1 }' co w C 'N U ca c 0 E co ate -1 a) O `� U W .E LL. — CO ca � E.2 D CU public infrastructure contract price. Maintenance Bond Framework Provides the City with a guarantee for the quality of contractor's work. . Protects City against defective workmanship or materials. s 0 0 0 c 0 U i 0 fC U 0. F • c �. 3 0 E S.3.. 7 u. szu v*' •.- ▪ 0 O ▪ L E L O *' • i "a•CU� to �U o,� t ▪ a 9 W . 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 Maintenance Bond Warranty Period 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Lea • lz Lea ▪ Ln a) " o •14 {.r Lea o a v 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 City notifies Contractor CYO AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of September 12, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of September 26, 2017 DATE: August 9, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Samuel "Keith" Selman, Assistant City Manager KeithSe(c�cctexas.com 361.826.3898 FROM: Rudy Bentancourt, Housing and Community Development Director RudyB(cr�cctexas.com 361.826.3044 Annual Board Meeting of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation CAPTION: Annual Board Meeting of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation PURPOSE: The purpose is to hold the Annual Board Meeting of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation and to elect officers. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: After each City Council election and the appointment of new board members, the CCHFC must elect new officers. The Bylaws provide for the following: President, Vice President, Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer, General Manager and Assistant General Manager. Typically, the President and Vice President have been elected from the Board of Directors and at the last election Chad Magill and Rudy Garza were elected to those positions. The Bylaws provide that all officers do not have to be Board members, and the remaining positions have been held by the persons on City staff holding the functional equivalent positions. The recommendation for these positions is as follows: General Manager Margie Rose Assistant General Manager Samuel "Keith" Selman Secretary Rebecca Huerta Assistant Secretary Paul Pierce Treasurer Constance Sanchez Assistant Treasurer Alma Casas Additionally, the Board will go into Executive Session pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code to discuss and deliberate the sale or exchange and value of the real property located on the west side of Chaparral Street between Peoples Street and Schatzel Street known as the Ward Building and adjacent parking lot, with possible action thereafter in open session. ALTERNATIVES: The City may select any persons as officers as indicated. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The action conforms to all applicable City and CCHFC policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency. This item requires only one meeting of the CCHFC Board. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Housing and Community Development and City Secretary's Office FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2017- 2018 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the election of new officers LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Agenda for CCHFC Board Meeting Unapproved June 21, 2016, Board Meeting Minutes Treasurer's Report CCHFC Bylaws Date: Time: Location: AGENDA CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING Tuesday, September 26, 2017 During the meeting of the City Council beginning at 11:30 a.m. City Council Chambers, Corpus Christi City Hall 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 1. Vice President Rudy Garza calls meeting to order. 2. Secretary Rebecca Huerta calls roll. Board of Directors , President Rudy Garza, Vice President Michael T. Hunter Lucy Rubio Carolyn Vaughn Paulette Guajardo Ben Molina Joe A. McComb Greg Smith Debbie Lindsey -Opel 3. Election of Officers: 4. 5. 6. 7. President Vice President Public Comment Approval of the minutes of June 21, 2016. Review of Treasurer's Report. Officers Margie C. Rose, General Manager E. Jay Ellington, Asst. General Manager Rebecca Huerta, Secretary Paul Pierce, Asst. Secretary Constance P. Sanchez, Treasurer Alma Casas, Asst. Treasurer General Manager Assistant General Manager Secretary Assistant Secretary Treasurer Assistant Treasurer Executive Session pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code to discuss and deliberate the sale or exchange and value of the real property located on the west side of Chaparral Street between Peoples Street and Schatzel Street known as the Ward Building and adjacent parking lot, with possible action thereafter in open session. 8. Adjournment MINUTES CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION SPECIAL MEETING June 21, 2016 1:03 p.m. PRESENT Board of Directors Chad Magill, President Rudy Garza, Jr., Vice -President Michael T. Hunter Nelda Martinez Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn Officers Ronald L. Olson, General Manager E. Jay Ellington, Asst. General Manager Rebecca Huerta, Secretary Paul Pierce, Asst. Secretary Constance P. Sanchez, Treasurer Alma Casas, Asst. Treasurer President Magill called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 1:03 p.m. Secretary Huerta verified that a quorum of the Board was present to conduct the meeting and that notice of the meeting had been posted. President Magill, deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 7 and called for public comment. There was none. President Magill, referred to Item 3 and called for approval of the minutes of the April 19, 2016 Annual Meeting. Board Member Rubio made a motion to approve the minutes as presented, seconded by Board Member McIntyre, and passed as follows: Garza, Hunter, McIntyre, Magill, Martinez, Rosas, Rubio, Scott, and Vaughn voting "Aye". President Magill, referred to Item 4 and called for the presentation of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation (CCHFC) Treasurer's Report ending April 30, 2016. Constance Sanchez, Director of Finance, stated the Statement of Net Position Report showed assets were $1,330,379 with liabilities of $406,152 for a total fund balance of $924,227. She reported the total revenues for that period were $15,397, expenditures of $1,124 with an excess of revenues over expenditures of $14,273 for a total fund balance of $924,227. There were no questions. President Magill, referred to Item 5, designation of a new General Manager. He stated staff is recommending the new appointment of Margie C. Rose as General Manager. Board Member Martinez made a motion to appoint Margie C. Rose as General Manager, seconded by Board Member Scott, and passed as follows: Garza, Hunter, McIntyre, Magill, Martinez, Rosas, Rubio, Scott, and Vaughn voting "Aye". President Magill, referred to Item 6, adoption of a resolution authorizing the execution of loan documents with River View at Calallen, LP and Citibank, N.A., in connection with a loan in the amount of $1,440,000 to assist in financing the development of the River View at Calallen Apartments. John Bell, Legal Counsel for CCHFC, stated in February 2015 CCHFC approved loan commitments for five different projects that were vying for low-income housing tax credits through the State, with the understanding that the applicants that won the program at the State level would Minutes — CCHFC June 21, 2016 — Page 2 then have their commitment move forward. There were two winners in Corpus Christi. One was the Glenoak Apartments Renovation Project and the other was the River View at Calallen Apartments Project which won in the regional competition. Mr. Bell stated the loan commitment was for a loan in an amount of up to $1.8 million for a term of 15 years with a 30 -year amortization at 3%, conditioned on the developer providing a loan through its lender to the CCHFC to provide the necessary funds to make that loan. Mr. Bell said the representative developer, Henry Flores, Sr., who was present at the meeting, and had negotiated with Citibank, N.A., his primary lender, who will have the first lien on the developer's project property in the amount of $1,440,000. Mr. Bell explained that this is the amount of money needed for the project to move forward. Mr. Bell stated that the 30 -year amortization needs to be changed to a 35 -year amortization because Citibank has the 35 -year amortization on their primary loan and they want the two to match. A board member asked for clarification of the loan process. Mr. Bell stated that the type of funding that is needed for the CCHFC is called conduit financing where the developer makes the funds available through its lender, CitiBank, N.A., who in turn loans the money to the CCHFC and the CCHFC loans the money to River View at Calallen Apartments. A Board member asked when the final selection was made to select the projects. Mr. Bell replied in July 2015. President Vaughn made a motion to approve a resolution authorizing the execution of loan documents with River View at Calallen, LP and Citibank, N.A., in connection with a loan in the amount of $1,440,000 to assist in financing the development of the River View at Calallen Apartments, seconded by Board Member Rubio. The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garza, Hunter, McIntyre, Magill, Martinez, Rosas, Rubio, Scott, and Vaughn voting "Aye". There being no further business to come before the Corporation, President Magill adjourned the meeting at 1:15 p.m. on June 21, 2016. 9030 CC HOUSING FINANCE CORPORTATION COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET June 30, 2017 June 30 FY 2017 2016 Assets Cash, cash equivalents & investments $ 184,741 $ 127,330 Receivables Accounts 397,152 397,152 Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Deferred revenue Total liabilities $ 581,893 $ 524,482 $397,152 $397,152 397,152 397,152 Fund Balance Assigned 184,741 127,330 Total fund balance 184,741 127,330 Total liabilities and fund balances $581,893 $524,482 9030 CC HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 June 30 FY 2017 2016 Revenues Charges for services $ 53,483 $ 42,037 Contributions and Donations 5,000 0 Earnings on investments 52 4 Total revenues 58,535 42,041 Expenditu res Administration cost Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year 1,124 1,711 1,124 1,711 57,411 40,330 127,330 87,000 $ 184,741 $ 127,330 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Accounts Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation Exhibit 26-A Governmental Schedule Funds Adjustments of Net Position $ 127,330 $ $ 127,330 397,152 397,152 795,445 795,445 Total assets $ 524,482 795,445 1,319,927 LIABILITIES Unearned revenues Other $ 397,152 397,152 Total liabilities 397,152 397,152 FUND BALANCE Assigned Housing 127,330 (127,330) Total liabilities and fund balance $ 524,482 NET POSITION Investment in capital assets 795,445 795,445 Unrestricted 127,330 127,330 Total net position $ 922,775 $ 922,775 182 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 26-B CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Governmental Schedule Funds Adjustments of Activities Expenditures/expenses Community development $ 1,710 $ 27,508 $ 29,218 Total expenditures/expenses 1,710 27,508 29,218 Program revenue Charges for services 42,037 42,037 Net program revenue (expense) 40,327 (27,508) 12,819 General revenue Earnings on investments Change in fund balance/net position Fund balance/net position beginning of year Fund balance/net position end of year 183 3 3 40,330 87,000 (27,508) 12,822 822,953 909,953 $ 127,330 $ 795,445 $ 922,775 CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I - OFFICERS Section 1.01. The principal office of the corporation shall be in the City of Corpus Christi, County of Nueces, State of Texas. ARTICLE 11- DIRECTORS Section 2.01. The number of Directors which shall constitute the whole Board shall be nine. The initial Directors shall serve for a period coterminous with the terms of City Council members at the time of adoption of these bylaws. The successor Directors shall be elected for terms approximately coterminous with the terms of City Council members. Any director may succeed himself. Section 2.02. The property and business of the corporation shall be managed by the Board of Directors which may exercise all powers of the corporation and do all lawful acts. Section 2.03. The annual meeting of the Board of Directors shall be held at the principal office of the Corporation during a City Council meeting in February of each year, or at such time and place as shall be designated by the President on three days' written notice to each of the Directors. All other meetings may be held at the place selected by the Board either within or without the State of Texas. Section 2.04. Regular meetings, other than the annual meeting, may be held at such time as shall be determined by the Board. Section 2.05. Special meetings of the Board may be called by the President on three days' notice to each Director, either personally or by mail or by telegram; special meetings shall be called by the President or Secretary in like manner on like notices on the written request of two Directors. Section 2.06. At all meetings of the Board the presence of a majority of the Directors shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and the act of a majority of the Directors present at any meetings at which there is a quorum shall be the act of the Board of Directors, except as may be otherwise specifically provided by these bylaws. If a quorum shall not be present at any meeting of the Directors, the Directors present thereat may recess the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum shall be present. Section 2.07. A meeting of the Directors can be held at any time without notice upon the execution by all Directors, of a written waiver of notice, and likewise may be held without notice when all of the Directors are present at the meeting. Committees of Directors Section 2.08. The Board of Directors may, by resolution or resolutions adopted by a majority of the whole Board, establish one or more committees, each committee to consist of two or more of the Directors of the corporation, which to the extent permitted by law and if so provided in said resolution or resolutions, when the Board is not in session, shall have and exercise the powers of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the corporation, and may have power to authorize the seal of the corporation to be affixed to all papers which may require it. Such committee or committees shall have such name or names as may be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. Section 2.09. The committees shall keep regular minutes of their proceedings and report the same to the Board when required. Section 2.10. Directors, as such, shall not receive any compensation for their services, but, by resolution of the Board a reimbursement of expenses of attendance, if any, may be allowed for attendance at each regular or special meeting of the Board. Members of special or standing committees may be allowed like reimbursement for attending committee meetings. ARTICLE III - NOTICES Section 3.01. Whenever, under the provisions of the statutes or these bylaws, notice is required to be given to any Director, it shall not be construed to mean personal notice, but such notice may be given in writing, by mail, addressed to such Director at such address as appears on the books of the corporation, and such notice shall be deemed to be given at the time when the same shall be thus mailed. Section 3.02. Whenever any notice is required to be given under the provisions of the statutes or of these bylaws, a waiver thereof in writing signed by the person or persons entitled to said notice, whether before or after the time stated therein, shall be deemed equivalent thereto. ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS Section 4.01. The officers of the corporation shall be chosen by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall choose from its members a President and a Vice President. The Board of Directors shall also choose a Secretary and a Treasurer who may or may not be members of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall, by majority vote of all members, designate a General Manager of the corporation. The Board of Directors also shall have the option, by a majority vote of all members, to designate an Assistant General Manager of the corporation. The General Manager and the Assistant General Manager shall not members of the Board of Directors, but shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, and shall be under their supervision. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person, except the offices of President, Secretary and General Manager. 2 Section 4.02. The Board of Directors shall choose such officers at its first meeting and at each annual meeting thereafter. Section 4.03. The officers of the corporation chosen pursuant to Section 4.02 shall serve until the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors or until their successors are chosen and qualify in their stead. Section 4.04. The Board may appoint such other officers and agents as it shall deem necessary, who shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined from time to time by the Board. Section 4.05. Any officer elected or appointed by the Board of Directors may be removed at any time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board of Directors. If the office of any officer becomes vacant for any reason, the vacancy shall be filled by the Board of Directors. The President Section 4.06. The President shall preside at all meetings of the Directors. Section 4.07. The President shall be ex officio a member of all standing committees, shall have general supervision of the management of the business of the corporation, and shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board are carried into effect. Section 4.08. The President shall execute bonds, mortgages and other contracts requiring a seal, under the seal of the corporation, except where required for permitted by law to be otherwise signed and executed and except where the signing and execution thereof shall be expressly delegated by the Board of Directors to some other officer or agent of the corporation. Vice President Section 4.09. The Vice President shall, in the absence or disability of the President, perform the duties and exercise the powers of the President, and shall perform such other duties as the Board of Directors shall prescribe. The Secretary Section 4.10. The Secretary shall attend all sessions of the Board and record all votes and the minutes of all proceedings in a book to be kept for that purpose and shall perform like duties for the standing committees when required. He shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all special meetings of the Board of Directors and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors under whose supervision he shall be. He shall keep in safe custody the seal of the corporation and, when authorized by the Board, affix the same to any instrument requiring it, and when so affixed, it shall be attested by his signature. And when the corporate seal is required as to instruments executed in the course or ordinary business he shall attest to the signature of the President or Vice President and shall affix the seal thereto. 3 The Treasurer Section 4.11. The Treasurer shall have the custody of the corporate funds and the securities and shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the corporation and shall deposit all moneys and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the corporation in a depository as shall be designated by the Board of Directors. He shall disburse the funds of the corporation as may be ordered by the Board, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to the President and Directors, at the regular meetings of the Board, or whenever they may require it, an account of all his transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the corporation. The Board of Directors may appoint an Assistant Treasurer to assist the Treasurer and who, in the absence or inability of the Treasurer to serve, shall perform the duties of the Treasurer. The General Manager Section 4.12. The General Manager shall oversee and be responsible for the overall management and administration of the corporation. The Board of Directors may appoint an Assistant General Manager to assist the General Manager and who, in the absence or inability of the General Manager to serve, shall perform the duties of the General Manager. Section 4.13. The Board of Directors may require the President, Vice President, the Secretary and the Treasurer to give the corporation bonds on such sums and with such surety or sureties as shall be satisfactory to the Board for the faithful performance of the duties of their office and for the restoration to the corporation, in case of death, resignation, retirement or removal from office, of all books, papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in their possession or under their control belonging to the corporation. ARTICLE V - FISCAL PROVISIONS Section 5.01. The Board of Directors shall have prepared for each annual meeting a full and clear statement of the business and condition of the corporation. Checks Section 5.02. All checks or demands for money and notes of the corporation shall be signed by and any two of the following: the President, the Vice President, the Secretary, the Treasurer, the Assistant Treasurer, the General Manager, the Assistant General Manager, or such other person or persons as the Board of Directors may from time to time designate. Fiscal Year Section 5.03. The fiscal year shall be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VI - SEAL 4 Section 6.01. The corporate seal shall be circular and shall have inscribed in the outer circle the name of the corporation, and shall have inscribed in the inner circle the letters "T E X A S" and a five -pointed star. Said seal may be used by causing it or a facsimile thereof to be impressed or affixed or reproduced or otherwise. The imprint of this seal thus authorized is affixed opposite to this section. ARTICLE VII - AMENDMENTS Section 7.01. These bylaws may be altered, changed or amended at any meeting of the Board of Directors at which a quorum is present, provided notice of the proposed alteration, change or amendment be contained in the notice of such meeting, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Directors at such meeting and present thereat. F:A2705\0\Bylaws-Amended-14-0218.docx 5