HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 01/18/2012(MINUTES WERE AMENDED ON THE FLOOR AT THE 02101112 MEETING)
MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Council Chambers - City Hall
January 18, 2012
5:30 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS:
Rudy Garza, Chairman
A. Javier Huerta, Vice - Chairman
Mark Adame
Marco Castillo
Gabriel Guerra
Evon J. Kelly
Govind Nadkarni
John C. Tamez
John Taylor
STAFF:
Rudy D. Garza, Interim Assistant City
Manager
Stephen Draper, Interim Director
Miguel S. Saldaha, AICP, Interim Manager,
Land Development
Pete Anaya, P. E., Director of Planning
Daniel Biles, P.E. Director of Engineering
Faryce Goode - Macon, Assistant Director
Mic Raasch, AICP, Senior Planner
Wesley Vardemen, City Planner
Andrew Dimas, City Planner
Deborah Brown, Assistant City Attorney
Linda Williams, Recording Secretary
Si usted quiere dirigirse a la comision y su ingles es limitado, habra un interprete de
espanol a ingles en la junta para ayudarle.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Garza at 5:30 p.m, and a quorum
was declared.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion to approve the January 4, 2012 minutes was made by Commissioner Taylor and
seconded by Commissioner Nadkarni. Motion passed.
III. PRESENTATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE FY 2012 -13 ANNUAL
CAPITAL BUDGET & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Pete Anaya, Director of Planning, addressed the commission. Mr. Anaya stated
that the handout provided in the packet provide an overall view of the long -range plans
for the utility CIP over a 10 -year period. Mr. Anaya continued that Staff was at tonight's
meeting to give a presentation on the 2012 -13 Annual Capital Budget and Capital
Improvements Program. Mr. Anaya stated he would briefly highlight the first three years
of the program instead of discussing each year. Mr. Anaya continued the summary sheet
recapped the overall budget and capital improvements program and the projected
funding needed for the ten -year Utility CIP and Street Utility requirements. All of the
projects are long -range plans that provided an overall perspective of what funding was
needed in order to replace, maintain and make needed repairs. Mr. Anaya explained that
under the category of Street Utility Requirements — projected funding was for the first
five years and totaled $50,703.6 million — total included all three utilities, CIP Utility
Requests: Year 1 to Year 10 projects costs totaled $587,725.5 million and the Total
Program project costs for Year 1 to Year 10 totaled $638,429.1 million. Mr. Anaya
continued that the Life Cycle Annual Requirement was a breakdown of the cost of
funding to cover true needs and replacement on a year -by -year basis — Water: $31
million, Storm Water - $19 million and Wastewater - $1.6 million. Mr. Anaya continued
that in order to fund some of the projects, a rate increase was being considered, but at
this point, nothing has been finalized. Mr. Anaya concluded that the summary presented
at tonight's meeting provided a perspective as to what it would cost to fund the projects
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 2
included. Some of the projects included at this time may be not included at the final listing
that has to be approved by City Council.
Vice Chairman Huerta asked if the projects included were based just on needs
and had not been compared with any items that were included on lists provided by
department heads and other groups and Mr. Anaya answered yes. Vice Chairman
Huerta asked for clarification in reading the costs needed for Year 1 if the $77 million
would be added to the $31 million would total $108 million for Year 1 to fund projects and
Mr. Anaya explained that it was not just one utility, but all of the utilities were included.
Chairman Garza asked if the projections were based on a year -to year basis and
it was answered that the costs were based on a 3 -year program. Mr. Anaya stated that
Staff tried to project how the rates associated with projects adopted as part of last year's
CIP program would impact this year's CIP program.
Commissioner Castillo stated this was his first term on the Planning Commission
and he asked for clarification as to what the Planning Commission's role was in the
process since the projects were already provided, Commissioner Castillo stated if the
projects were already prioritized, would more projects be added based on input from the
commission and other departments. At this point, Mr. Daniel Biles, Acting Director of
Engineering Services, addressed the commission. Mr. Biles answered that in preparing
the ranked list of projects provided, several things were taken into consideration in
compiling the list. Mr. Biles stated, using wastewater as an example, that in calculating
funding, several components were taken into consideration; compliance, failures,
licensing, Staff reviewed the projects that were previously ranked on last year's listing,
but this year the ranking could be different based on at what stage some of the projects
were. The project might have been ranked No. 20 on last year's listing, but in this year's
process, and for this year's ranking, the project was moved because it was already under
construction. Mr. Biles continued that different scenarios were used in formulating the
cost and the impact on what might happen.
Castillo asked if this CIP program would address flooding issues and how recent
flooding affects health and safety issues. Commissioner Castillo continued that he felt
when Staff evaluated the ranked projects to fund; those types of issues would have been
factored into the calculations. Commissioner Castillo went on to say that after reading
the article in the newspaper regarding the overall condition of the city streets, it seems
there are not enough available funds to maintain or repair the existing ones. Mr. Biles
stated there was a. lack of money to maintain the infrastructure.
Commissioner Castillo commented that based on the CIP requests, how are we
to know what funding was available in the bond program, based on what rates and where
the cut -off line would be. Mr. Biles explained that the rate increases were projected on
the utility rate and what rate that would be ultimately lies with Staff. After that
determination has been made, Staff submits that recommendation to City Council; who
ultimately has the choice to approve or not. Commissioner Castillo stated that at this
point, he was not sure what the Planning Commission could recommend based on the
fact that the priority list has already been compiled.
Mr. Anaya stated that once the subcommittee meets, along with Planning and
Finance staff, the committee would discuss and possibly come up with other funding
options. Commissioner Castillo asked at what point in the 2012 Bond Program have
policies been adopted that will not get the City into the situation we are currently in now.
Commissioner Castillo continued that if new policies stated we were going to reconstruct
the roads and also fund utilities, how does that all come about.
KAOEVELOPMENTSVGMSHAREW. PLANNING COMMISSIONX2012 PC12012 MINUTES1O1.18.12,PCMINS.000
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 3
Vice Chairman Huerta stated that if this matrix increases the rates by 8 percent,
the models are not sustainable and there may be a need to be realistic in projecting
correctly. Vice Chairman Huerta continued that if we were not able to get an 8 percent
increase, the numbers should be more realistic and staff should figure out how to get
what is needed,
After all comments and discussion concluded, no formal action was taken.
Chairman Garza expressed thanks to Mr. Anaya and Mr. Biles for their attendance at
tonight's meeting and for the summary of the annual budget and CIP program.
Mr. Saldana stated that selecting the subcommittee members from the
commission could be made at the end of the meeting. Once the members have been
selected, Staff will inform Mr. Anaya. Mr. Saldana continued that the final
recommendations for the 2012 Calendar should be completed by mid -May.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS
A. PLATS
Wesley Vardeman, Development Services, read Continued Plat Items "a" and "c"
into record as shown below. Mr, Vardeman continued that the plats satisfied all
requirements of the Unified Development Codes and Staff recommended approval.
1. Continued Plats
a. 1011070 -NP051 (14- 21000022)
River Ridae Unit 3 (Final — 11.420 Acres)
Located west of County Road 69 between County Road 52 and
Northwest Boulevard (FM 624).
0112004 -P001 (12- 22000001)
Bakers Acres, Block 2, Lots 24B & 24C (Final Replat — 0.72
Acre)
Located south of Division Road between Sentinel Drive and
Woodcrest Drive.
The public hearing was opened with no one coming forward in favor or in
opposition and the public hearing was closed. Motion to approve Continued Plats Items
"a" and "c" was made by Commissioner Nadkarni and seconded by Commissioner
Taylor. Motion passed.
Wesley Vardeman read Continued Plats Item "b" into record as shown below.
Mr. Vardeman continued that the applicant for Item "b" submitted a letter of request to
table action on the plat until the February 15, 2012 meeting and Staff recommended
approval of the request.
b. 1211082 -NP068 (11- 21000026)
River Square Unit 2, Block 8, Lots 5A & 5B (Final Replat -- 2.28
Acres)
Located north of Interstate Highway 37 and east of McKinzle
Road.
The public hearing was opened with no one coming forward in favor or in
opposition and the public hearing was closed. Motion to approve tabling action on
KADEVELOPMENTSVMSHARE011. PLANNING COMMISSIONQ012 PCW12 MINUTESV.18.12.PCMINS.D0C
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2412
Page 4
Continued Plats Item "b" to the February 15, 2012 meeting was made by Commissioner
Tamez and seconded by Vice Chairman Huerta. Motion passed.
2. New Plats
Wesley Vardeman read New Plats Items "a" and "b" into record as shown below,
Mr. Vardeman continued that the plats satisfied all requirements of the Unified
Development Code and Staff recommended approval.
0112005 -P002 (12- 22000002)
Bay Area at Southlake, Block 1, Lot 1LFinal —10.00 Acres)
Located east of Rodd Field Road between Brooke Road and
Slough Road.
b. 0112010 -NP006 (12- 20000002)
Airline Crossing. Units 2 & 3 (Preliminary— 33.35 Acres)
Located west of Airline Road and south of Lipes
Boulevard.
The public hearing was opened with no coming forward in favor or in opposition
and the public hearing was closed. Motion to approve New Plat Items "a" and "b" was
made by Commission Tamez and seconded by Commission Nadkarni. Motion passed.
3. Time Extensions
Wesley Vardeman read Time Extensions Items "a," "b" and "c" into record as
shown below. Mr, Vardeman continued that a twelve -month time extension was
requested for Item "a" and a six -month time extension was requested for Items "b" and
"c. This was the fifth request for Item "a," second request for Item "b" and the first
request for Item "c" and Staff recommended approval of the requests.
a. 0106023 -NP010
River Bend Ranch (Preliminary — 215.32 Acres)
Located south of Yorktown Boulevard and east of Rodd Field
Road.
b. 0310013 -NP011 (10- 21000004)
Oso River Estates, Block 4, Lot 1 (Final - 18.951 Acres)
Located south of South Padre Island Drive (SH 358) between
Lexington Road and Paul .tones Avenue.
C. 0711063 -PO13 (11- 22000013)
Manhattan Estates Unit 4 (Final — 8.799 Acres)
Located south of Lipes Boulevard and west of Airline Road.
The public hearing was opened and no came forward in favor or in opposition,
Commissioner Tamez asked if six months was enough time and Staff answered that six
months was the maximum amount of time allowed for a final plat. The public hearing was
closed. Motion to approve a twelvemonth time extension for Item "a," and a six -month
time extension for Items "b" and "c" was made by Commissioner Nadkarni and seconded
by Commissioner Kelly. Motion passed.
K:%DEVELOPMENTSVO8kSHAREM1. PLANNING COMMISSIONUO12 PC12012 MINUTE&01.18.12.PCMINS.DOC
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 5
IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS (cont.)
B. NEW ZONING
New Zoning
Mr, Miguel Saldaha, Development Services, read New Zoning Item "a" into
record as shown below.
a. Case No. 0112 -02 (12- 10000002) — Asset Development
Corporation: A change of zoning from "RS -6" Single - Family 6
District and "RM -AT" Multi- Family AT District to a "CR -2" Resort
Commercial District resulting in a change of future land use from
park and single - family residential to tourist. _
Property is described as being an 111.69 acre tract of land; said
111.69 acre tract being comprised of the following tracts: Block
27A, Padre Island- Corpus Christi Fairway Estates, (Volume 46,
Pages 208 -210), Lot 1, Block 27B, Padre Island- Corpus Christi
Island Fairway Estates, (Volume 47, Pages 163 -165), Lot 14,
Block 43, Lots 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7, Block 44 and Lots 6 and 8, Block
43, portions of Maracaibo Drive and Zaraza Drive, Padre Island -
Corpus Christi Island Fairway Estates, (Volume 42, Pages 10
and 11), Lot 20, Block 34, Padre Island- Corpus Christi Island
Fairway Estates, (Volume 40, Pages 183 and 184), Lots 7 -14,
Block 41, Padre Island- Carpus Christi Island Fairway Estates,
(Volume 42, Pages 16 and 17), located west of South Padre
Island Drive (PR 22) and south of Commodores Drive.
Mr. Saldaha began his presentation with a power point presentation showing
aerials of the subject property and adjacent properties. Mr. Saldaha continued that this
zoning change was requested to allow development that will include a water park and
associated resorts. Mr. Saldaha continued that the property was formerly used as part of
the golf course, Mr. Saldai a continued that the water park will use the majority of the
property and the remaining portion of the golf course will be redesigned. Mr. Saldaha
stated the Transportation Plan showed Park Road 22 as a major thoroughfare and
Commodores Drive as a local collector street.
The proposed site plan buffer shows the park west of the residential area and
surrounded by landscaping to buffer the residential properties. The Area Development
Plan future land use recommended the land to be developed with residential uses. The
proposed development will have no structures higher than 60 feet and the closest
residential property was located 200 feet to the west of the site with minimum impact. Mr.
Saldaha went on to say that one of the issues that was discussed. extensively was the
peak time hours for traffic. According to the MPO study, the peak hours were 8 a.m. and
5:30 p.m. The park hours of operation will be from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.; two hours after the
morning and evening peak times. A traffic impact study was not required.
Mr. Saldaha stated that two hundred (200) public notices were mailed and seven
(7) were returned in favor and one (1) was returned in opposition and Staff recommended
approval of the zoning change.
Vice Chairman Huerta asked if there were any pictures of the aerial views and
Mr. Saldaha showed the aerial view of the project with the 200 -foot buffer and notification
area. Vice Chairman Huerta asked how old was the aerial view and Mr. Saldaha
responded that the aerial was taken in 2010.
KMEVELOPMENTSVMSHAREM1. PLANNING OOMMISSIONUO12 P02012 MINUTEW1.18.12PCMINS,DOC
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 6
IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS (cont.)
B. NEW ZONING (cant.)
Commissioner Castillo asked if the roadway was adequate to handle the level of
service that would be associated with the water park and the resort development. Mr.
Charlie Cardenas, City Traffic Engineer, addressed the commission, Mr. Cardenas
stated a formal traffic impact study was not done; but based on the existing level of
service which is rated "A" — the free flow of traffic should continue even during the park
hours. Mr. Cardenas continued that a MPO Study was done on Park Road 22 and
Commodores Drive; Park Road 22 and Whitecap Boulevard and the traffic ran at Level
«
Commissioner Taylor asked what kind of population numbers, in relation to the
number of cars, would be generated at the peak time. Mr. Cardenas answered that the
engineering firm has compared a traffic impact study and their calculation was that the
population would be about 3,000 people and about 500 cars during the peak time. The
Commodores Drive /Park Road 22 would be able to accommodate the traffic.
Commissioner Taylor asked if there would be any provisions for any turnarounds
for people coming back into Corpus Christi and Mr. Cardenas answered that has to be
further discussed,
Commissioner Tamez asked what would be the impact of the zoning change for
the property if the park does not happen. Mr. Saldana responded that the Resort
Commercial District would allow the golf course to continue or some other resort activity
like hotel /motel uses would be allowed.
After commissioners' comments were concluded and before the public hearing
was opened, Chairman Garza asked the audience who were speaking to state their
name and addresses for the record, and limit their comments to three minutes. Chairman
Garza stated the comments were to be clear and concise and speakers were requested
to be courteous. Chairman Garza reminded everyone that the Planning Commission
does not approve the zoning, but it makes a recommendation to City Council for final
action, The public hearing was opened.
Ms. Maybeth Christensen, 15521 Cuttysark Street, addressed the commission.
Ms. Christensen stated she was speaking on behalf of the Padre Island Owners'
Association, and herself. Ms. Christensen continued she attended a community meeting
on the Island and she went to the meeting with a lot of questions regarding the project;
but the questions were addressed by the developers. Ms. Christensen continued she felt
the project would be a great use of the property. They have taken in account of the
design and created something "downtown" for the area. Ms. Christensen went on to say
that they have a charter school on the Island - Kinder through fourth grade, 250 students,
fifth through eighth grades — 150 students and the Flour Bluff School District buses
additional kids to the high school. The Island is a mixed community with retirees,
vacationers, and the weekenders. Ms. Christensen stated she looked at the project as a
positive event for the Island.
Mr. Robert Cushing, Jr., 14017 Cabana North, addressed the commission. Mr.
Cushing stated he wanted to address the commission and he would also like to submit
his written comments to the commission. Mr. Cushing stated he was opposed to the
zoning change from a procedural and statutory standpoint and, in his opinion, the project
has no merit. Mr. Cushing continued that there was no firm commitment from
Schlitterbahn and for the City to even consider approving the proposed "upzoning" of the
property was not good business. Mr. Cushing continued that the proposed zoning
KADEVELOPMENTSVCSISHAREM1. PLANNING COMMISSIONUO12 M2012 MINUTESM.IB.12.PCMINS.DOC
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 7
IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS (cont.)
B. NEW ZONING (cont.)
request was a direct contradiction #o the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Cushing referenced
the City Charter, Article V, Section 1 — Purpose and Intent. Mr, Cushing went on to say
that if the commission approved the requested zoning change, they would not be doing
their job as appointed board members.
Chairman Garza stated the Comprehensive Plan was more dated when we
looked at the zoning across the City. Chairman Garza continued that since the adoption
of the plan, there have been numerous zoning changes across the entire city, For the
Island, the City developed an "Island Overlay" to ensure that any development or growth
.on the Island would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Deborah Brown, Assistant City Attorney, addressed Mr. Cushing's reference
to Article V, Section 1 Purpose and Intent of the City Charter. Ms. Brown read the
Article and clarified that any action the Planning Commission decided upon at tonight's
meeting regarding the zoning request would not be in violation of the City Charter. Ms.
Brown continued that the Charter granted the Planning Commission the authority to make
such decision.
Mr. Martin Howard, 13737 Primavera, addressed the commission. Mr. Howard
stated that the Padre Island Owner's Association did not represent him. Mr. Howard
continued he had several major concerns with the water park proposal that have not
been addressed:
The proposed water park has not addressed the source of the fresh water that will
be necessary for the park. Mr. Howard continued that because of drought
conditions, property owners have been trying to maintain their yards and property
in watering even on a limited basis.
The hours of operation — It was stated the hours of operation will be from 10 a.m. to
8 p.m. Mr. Howard stated he did not see the park maintaining those hours when
other water parks were opened until 12 midnight. Mr. Howard continued that
anyone that has tried to cross the bridge to Padre Island during spring break can
identify with the heavy traffic problems encountered.
Safety and vandalism — Mr. Howard stated those items should also be taken into
consideration as to which entity would provide the necessary security - the City or
the water park. Mr. Howard continued there was no commitment from the park
officials. Mr. Howard went on to say that twelve (12) years ago, he moved from
New York to Padre Island because of the peaceful area and now that was going to
be jeopardized because of a water park.
Mr. Bobby Byrd, 13758 Tajamar, addressed the commission. Mr. Byrd stated he
should have received a public notice of the zoning change and his neighborhood was not
included in the notification area. Mr. Byrd stated that the 200 feet was not a sufficient
distance to serve as a buffer from a 60 -foot tall building. Mr. Byrd continued that with this
water park proposal, the integrity of the neighborhood has been compromised. Mr. Byrd
continued he felt the notification area should have included more residents. Mr. Byrd
added that it seems the city's intent was to sweeten the deal for the developer to the
detriment of the citizens and neighborhoods.
MDEVELOPMENTSVMSHARED11. PLANNING COMMISSIONUO12 PCQ012 MINUTES101- 18.12_PCMINS.DOC
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 8
IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS (cont.)
B. NEW ZONING (cont.)
Mr. Curtis Ford, resident of Pharoah Valley, addressed the commission. Mr.
Food stated he was 95 years old and was a former state official in 1957. Mr. Ford
continued he attended the meeting on Padre Island and he was very impressed with the
developers' presentation. Mr. Ford stated he was in favor of the proposal and he thought
it would be good for the entire city and not just the residents that live on the Island,
Ms, Elza Cushing, 14017 Cabana, North, addressed the commission. Ms.
Cushing stated she was an environmental engineer and a civil engineer and she wanted
to let the commission know that she opposed the water park proposal and felt the
Commission should not approve the zoning change. Ms. Cushing wanted to know how
this happened without any public hearings. Ms. Cushing continued that this process was
almost like "imminent domain." Ms. Cushing stated that almost 500 acres would be
impacted and that impact would be in a huge way that the action the commission took
tonight in approving this request would be in direct conflict with the comprehensive plan
for the Island.
Mr. Rhodes "Chip" Urban, Project Engineer, 2725 Swantner, addressed the
commission. Mr. Urban stated he wanted to address several concerns that have been
voiced.
The traffic — There seems to be a lot of concern regarding the increased
traffic to the Island during the hours of operation for the park. Mr. Urban
continued that the increase should not be any more than what was
experienced during spring break. During spring break, there was no
official kick -off time for the breakers to begin traveling to and from the
Island. Mr. Urban continued that it was determined that about 50 to 60
trips would be coming out of the park after the evening peak time. The
rush would occur between 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. and the traffic would go out
through Commodores Drive.
Schlitterbahn hours of operation — all parks closed at 8 p.m. The lighting
problem will be eliminated because it's closed before dark.
Fresh water will be used to fill the areas needed. The first time will take
a significant amount of water. The only water use after the initial time
would be for the evaporation.
A question was asked regarding how much the proposed water park would cost
and Mr. Paul Schexnailder, property owner, stated the estimated cost for the total project
totaled about $350 million. Commissioner Taylor asked if Staff had any idea of the tax
revenue associated with this project and would there be any tax incentives or tax
abatements provided for the project. Mr. Rudy Garza, Assistant City Manager,
responded that at this time, staff did not have the information regarding the tax revenue.
Mr. Garza continued there would be some tax incentives given, but at this time, he could
not state what they would be.
Commissioner Castillo asked if this area would be a TIF and Mr. Garza
responded that the taxes would remain on the Island.
After all comments and discussion concluded, the public hearing was closed,
Chairman Garza called for a motion. Motion to approve New Zoning Item "a" was made
by Commissioner Guerra and seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Motion passed.
KADEVELOPMENTSVCSISHAREM1. PLANNING COMMISSIOM52012 P012012 MINUTES401.18.12.PCMIN8.DOC
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 9
IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS (cont.)
B. NEW ZONING
1. New Zoning
Ms. Jennifer Ramirez, Development Services, read New Zoning Item "b" into
record as shown below. Ms. Ramirez provided a power point presentation showing
aerials of the subject property and adjacent properties. Ms. Ramirez continued that this
site was the location of Furr's Restaurant; which has been demolished. The property is
bounded by Ethan Allen Furniture Gallery, Embassy Suite Hotel, Seven property owners
were notified and no notices were returned in favor or in opposition. Ms. Ramirez
continued that the proposed zoning request was consistent with the UDC requirements
and Staff recommended approval of the change of zoning.
b. Case No. 0112 -03 (12- 10000003) = Vashal Hotel, LP: A
change of zoning from "IL" Light Industrial District to a "CG -2"
General Commercial District not resulting in a change of future
land use.
Property is described as Byron Willis Subdivision, Block 2A, Lot
J, located south of South Padre Island Drive (SH 358) and west
of Flynn Parkway.
Chairman Garza opened the public hearing.
Ms. Linda Clark, 336 Kingston Drive, addressed the commission. Ms. Clark
stated she has been a hotelier for about thirty -five years and she was excited about the
opportunity to have a another hotel in the city. After Ms. Clark's comment, the public
hearing closed.
Chairman Garza called for a motion. Motion to approve New Zoning Item "b"
was made by Commissioner Nadkarni and seconded by Vice. Chairman Huerta. Motion
passed.
V. PRESENTATION AND ACTION ON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT
AMENDMENTS
Andrew Dimas, Development Services, presented an overview of the proposed
text amendments for the Unified Development Code. Mr. Dimas sent an email to all
members of the focus groups outlining the proposed changes. The proposed changes
are as follows:
Article 1.11.2
Correcting the abbreviation of "ON" Neighborhood Office district to "ON" Office District.
Article 1.11.2
Correcting the abbreviation of "ON" Neighborhood Office district to "ON" Office District.
Article 1.11.3
Creating definitions for "Gross Floor Area ", "Water Surcharges ", "Wastewater
Surcharges ".
Article 3.1.3
Correcting the requirement that Special Use Exceptions, Certificate of Appropriateness,
and Variances do not require a posted public notice on the subject property.
K' IDEVELOPMENTSVCSISHARE011. PLANNING COMMISSIONX2012 PC12012 WNUTZS101.1B.12,PCMINS.000
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 10
V. PRESENTATION AND ACTION ON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT
AMENDMENTS (coat.)
Article 3.1.7.0 (4)
Correcting the content of notices to only reflect what is required on mailed notices. Under
current code requirements a graphic would be required to be published in the newspaper
Article 4.2.8.0
Clarifying the requirement of the 2:1 ratio on non - single - family residential building
setbacks adjacent to single- family residences as to the measurement being from the
existing ground level to the plate below the roof,
Article 4.2.8.13
Further clarifying that the 2:1 ratio does not apply to the first 12 feet in height of the non -
single- family residential building.
Article 4.2.10
Reducing the side yard setback to ten (10) on residential lots when the properties are
platted back to back (parallel). Properties that have an adjacent platted property to the
rear that faces the side street (perpendicular) will have two front yard setbacks rather
than one front yard setback and one side yard setback.
Article 4.2.11
Water Oriented Subdivisions: In a water oriented subdivision, the front yard setback can
be reduced to 10 feet, private garages must maintain a front yard setback to 20 feet, and
side yards may be modified for multifamily structures and accessory structures.
Article 4.3.3
Correcting the front yard setback of the "RS -6" Single- family 6 district to 25 feet and
reducing the rear yard setback requirement for ail single - family zoning districts (RS -15,
RS -10, RS -6, RS -4.5) from 15 feet to 5 feet.
Article 4.4.3.13
Under the "RM -AT Multifamily AT District for Mustang Island and Padre Island, adding
Corpus Christi Beach to the group and therefore reducing the minimum lot size
requirements from 10,000 sq. ft. to 5,000 sq. ft. and the minimum lot with from 85 feet to
50 feet for properties on Corpus Christi Beach.
Article 4.4.4
Correction of the town house graphic to eliminate units below one another, townhouses
may only be constructed side -by -side,
Article 4.6.2
Allowing retail sales and services and government facilities in the industrial zoning
districts (IL, IH).
Article 5.3.2.13
Urban Chickens: This article excludes chickens from the animal pen or fenced. pasture
restriction to the "FR" Farm Rural District.
Article 5.3.2.0
Elimination of the minimum 100 foot setback from property lines requirement. The fire
department will determine the placement of fuel storage tanks.
Article 5.3.2.D
K:IDEVEL0PMENTSVMSHARED51. PLANNING COMMISSION12012 PCU012 MINUTES101.18.12.PCMINS.D0C
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 11
V. PRESENTATION AND ACTION ON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT
AMENDMENTS (cont.)
The width of a private garage that faces a public right -of -way shall be limited to 40% the
width of the dwelling rather than 40% vs. 20 feet whichever less.
Article 7.2.4.1
Tandem parking shall be available to all substandard lots, not only those sponsored by
an affordable housing program.
Article 7.5.13.0
Modifying the sign allocation of institutional uses in non - commercial districts. If the use
fronts upon an arterial or expressway the sign may be up to 64 sq. ft. in area and 20 feet
in height. If the sign fronts upon a collector or local street the allocation is 40 sq, ft, and
also 20 ft. in height.
Article 8.2.1.G (7)
Front yard setback for cul -de -sacs or those on the knuckle of a circular portion may be
reduced to 15 feet.
Article 8.2.9
A. Definition of dead end main.
B. The creation of dead end mains is prohibited.
C. No dead end mains are permitted and all water lines must conform to TCEQ
requirements.
D. For existing Dead end mains are servicing an areas, progress must be made
to eliminate the dead end main by system looping.
Article 8.5.1.13
Water surcharges do not have to be paid prior to plat recordation.
Article 8.5.2.8.
Wastewater surcharges do not have to be paid prior to plat recordation.
After Mr. Dimas' presentation, the floor was opened for discussion and
comments. Chairman Garza opened the public hearing.
Ms. Carrie Robertson, 4401 Gulf Breeze Avenue, addressed the commission.
Mr. Robertson stated she was excited about the new text amendments and they would
greatly assist the interested property owners on North Beach in trying to get development
moving in the area. Ms. Robertson stated that she owns two lots that are side -by -side
and she has been working with Bob Payne and Annika Gunning in trying to rezone
property that was historically zoned. Ms. Robertson continued that the new text
amendments will certainly help their endeavor. Ms. Robertson stated that JoAnn
Gilbertson was the developer for the North Beach area and she has worked very hard in
getting things to happen in that area.
The public hearing. was closed. Motion to approve the UDC text amendments as
presented by Staff, was made by Commissioner Nadkarni and seconded by Commission
Tamez. Motion passed.
K:10EVELOPMENTSVCMHAREW, PLANNING COMMISSION42012 PCU012 MINUTES101.18.12.PCMINS.000
Planning Commission Meeting
January 18, 2012
Page 12
VI, DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. Saldana informed commissioners that a presentation on the South Central
Area Development Plan will be scheduled as a future agenda item and Lisa Wargo,
Senior Planner will be the presenter.
Mr. Saldana reminded commissioners that three volunteers were needed to
serve on the CIP Subcommittee. After a brief discussion, Commissioners Castillo,
Nadkarni and Tamez volunteered. Commissioner Nadkarni will chair the committee. The
committee's responsibility is to keep the commission abreast of any issues /concerns that
need to be addressed.
Vice Chairman Huerta asked the status of the adopted building codes and Mr.
Saldana responded that the codes had been adopted and passed by City Council.
There being no further business, motion to adjourn was made. by Commissioner
Castillo and seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Motion passed and the meeting
adjourned at 7:A0 p.m.
r
Date:
mig6efs. Sal ana, AICP
Secretary to Planning Commission
Date: Ir�
'Linda illiams Se
Recor 'ng cretary
KADEVELOPMENTSVMSHAREDI1. PLANNING COMMISSIM2012 P02012 MINUTES101.16,12.PCMINS.00C