Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 09/09/2015 MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI City Hall Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street September 9, 2015 5:30 P.M. COMMISSIONERS: STAFF: Philip Ramirez, Chairman* Daniel M. Grimsbo, P.E., Director Jeremy Baugh Development Services Fred Braselton Julio Dimas, Assistant Director, Jonas Chupe Development Services Carl Crull* Annika Gunning Yankee, Senior Heidi Hovda Project Planner Mike Lippincott Julian Grant, Senior Assistant City Eric Villarreal, Vice Chairman Attorney Marsha Williams Dolores Wood, Project Manager Planner Linda Williams, Recording Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Vice Chairman Villarreal and a quorum was declared. 11. ABSENCE Philip Ramirez, Chairman Carl Crull Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. August 26, 2015 Meeting Motion to approve Item 1," the August 26, 2015 minutes was made by Commissioner Lippincott and seconded by Commissioner Braselton. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Crull absent. IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS—Discussion and Possible Action A. PLATS New Plats Julio Dimas, Development Services, read New Plats Items "2" through "4" into record as shown below. Mr. Dimas stated the plats satisfied all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and State Law and the Technical Review Committee recommends approval. 2. 0716103-NP082 (15-21000030) WILDCAT INDUSTRIAL PARK, BLOCK 2, LOT 8 (FINAL—3.669 ACRES) Located west of Southern Minerals Road and south of Leopard Street. 3. 0715104-NP083 (15-21000031) WEST END ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 4A(FINAL REPLAT—0.473 ACRE) Located north of Leopard Street and east of State Highway 288. Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 0. 2O15 Page |l/. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS—Discussion and Possible Action A. PLATS New Plats (nont) 4. 0815118-NP090 (15-21000033) FIRST DEFENSE SELF-STORAGE TRACT, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 (FINAL—3.89 ACRES) Located north of Brooke Road and west of Rodd Field Road. After Staff's pneeentaUon, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. There being none, the public hearing was opened with no one coming forward and the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for amotion. Motion toapprove New Plats Items ^2^through ~4^ was made byCommissioner Villarreal and seconded by Commissioner Lippincott. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner CruUabsent. Vice Chairman Villarreal requested that the record reflect Commissioner Bnase|tonabstained from the discussion and action taken on New Plats ^G." Mr. Dimas read New Plats [hem ^S^ into record as shown below. Mr. Dimas ebabad the plat satisfied all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and the Technical Review Committee recommends approval. 5. 0815122-NP094(15-20000009) RIVERBEND SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY— 195.3 ACRES) Located south of Yorktown Boulevard and east of Rodd Field Road. After Staff's preeantabon, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. There being none, the public hearing was opened with noone coming forward and the public hearing was dosed. Vice ChaimanW|l arrealcalled for a motion. Motion to approve New Plats Item '5^was made hy Commissioner Chupaand seconded byCommissioner Baugh. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent and Commissioner Braoe|tunabstained. Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption Mr. Dimas read Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption Item ^6^ into record as shown below. Mr. Dimas stated the plat satisfied all requirements of the Unified Development Code(UDC)and the Technical Review Committee recommends approval. 6. 0815116-PO29<15-22000034\ CAH-DHL COMMERCIAL TRACTS, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 (FINAL—5.89 ACRES) Located east of Interstate Highway 69 at County Road 50. After Staff's presentation, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. There being none, the public hearing was opened with noone coming forward. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for motion. Motion to approve Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption Item ^6^ was made by Commissioner Chupeand seconded byCommissioner Baugh. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. � Planning Commission Regular Meeting September Q.2815 Page |V. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEK8S— Discussion and Possible Action A. PLATS Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption (cont.) Mr. Dimas read Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption Item ^7^ into record as shown below. Mr. Dimas stated the applicant is requesting m waiver of the public infrastructure improvements as required by the Technical Review Committee and an exemption of the wastewater |ot/acraeQeheee. Mr. Dimas read Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption Item"7"into record as shown below.Mr. Dimas stated the applicant is requesting a waiver of the public infrastructure improvements as required by the Technical Review Committee and enexemption ofthe wastewater lot/acreage fees, 7. Request for aWaiver ofSanitary Sewer Infrastructure Construction per Section 8.2.7.B.1.dii of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and an exemption from the Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fees in accordance with Section 8.5.2.G of the UDC Mr. Dimas stated the request for the waiver was based on the fact that the location of the existing infrastructure is not in close proximity to the property site where a can be made. The applicant is proposing (oconstruct anon-site wastewater septic tank facility. Mr. Dimas stated Staff recommends approval nfthe waiver and exemption request and the request has to receive final approval by City Council. After Staff's presmntaUon, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. After a comments and discussion ended by commissioners, the public hearing was opened. Murray Hudoon, Urban Engineering, 2725 Svvontner Drive, addressed the commission. Mr. Hudson stated herepresented the applicant and stated that asanitary sewer agreement would besubmitted that City Council has to also approve, Mr. Hudson continued the agreement would stipulate that if wastewater services become available within the next fifteen (15) yearo, the applicant has to connect to those services and the waived fees would be applicable atthe time ofconnection. There being nofurther comments, the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for a motion. Motion to approve Wastewater Lot/Acreage Fee Exemption Item ^Y~ao presented by Staff was made by Commissioner Lippincott and seconded by Commissioner Baugh. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. B. ZONING New Zoning � � Dolores Wood, Development Servioee, addressed the commission. Ms. Wood read New Zoning Item ^8^ into record as shown below. W1o. Wood stated the subject property was located within the boundaries ofthe Westside Area Development Han and is planned for low density residential and mobile home uses. Ms. Wood continued the proposed change of zoning to "RV^ Recreational Vehicle District consistent with adopted Future Land Use Plan and the area plan. 8. Case No. O815~84~ Cheryl McLaughlin and Hatch, LLC: Achange nfzoning from the "RMH^ Manufactured Home District and the"RS-6" Single-Family 8 District tothe "RV" Planning Commission Regular Meeting September D. 2015 Page IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS— Discussion and Possible Action B. ZONING � New Zoning—Item ''8" (oont.) � 3O14OOOg41. Official Public Records, NueceaCounty, Texas and being aportion ofa � called 1.13acre tract conveyed toJohn A. McLaughlin amrecorded inVolume 1828. Page 244, Deed ReoonJo, NuemamCounty. Texas, located at 3101 Up River Road between Westgate Drive and Pm|nn Drive. Mm. Wood presented several aerial views of the property and stated the purpose of the change of zoning is to allow expansion and upgrades to an existing RV park. K4o. Wood stated the applicant is proposing to rezone three adjoining land tracts totaling 9.16 acres in area. The existing land use on the three tracts consists of RV park uses. limited mobile home park use and vacant property. The number of existing RVspaces imcurrently 135. The rezoning will eliminate the mobile home park use and expand the RV park use. The total number ofRV parking spaces is planned for 200. K4a. Wood continued that the applicant intends to improve the overall site with respect to site access, available utilities and other support systems to comply with City codes and ordinances as well as applicable industry guidelines. Ms. Wood stated thirty-seven (37) notices were mailed to owners within the notification area, mix (0) notices were mailed to owners outside the notification area and no notices were returned in favor or opposition. Ms.Wood continued that Staff recommends approval of the change of zoning from the"RMH" Manufactured Home District and "RS-6" Single-Family U District to the ^RV^ Recreational Vehicle Park District. After Staff's presentation, Vice Chairman Villarreal opened the floor for comments and discussion by commissioners. After a brief discussion, the public hearing was opened with no one coming forward and the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for amotion. Motion boapprove the change of zoning from the"RK4H'^ Manufactured Home District and the ~IRS-G" Single-Family 6 District to the ~RV" Recreational Vehicle Park District was made byCommissioner Chupeand seconded by Commissioner Hnvdo. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and CommiasionerCru|| absent. AnnikmGunning Yankee, Development Services, addressed the commission. Ms. Yankee read New Zoning Item "Q^ into record as shown below. W1m. Yankee atehad the subject property was \Vogtmd � within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan and is planned for low density residential � uses. Ms.Yankee continued the proposed change ofzoning ho"RK4-1~Multifamily 1 District isnot consistent � with adopted Future Land Use Plan or the Northwest Area Development Plan. � 9. Case No. 0915-07 —Al Development, Inc.: Achan8e ofzoning from the"RS-6" Single- Family 0 District to the°F<K4-1" Multifamily 1 District, resulting in m change tothe Futuna Land Use Plan from low to medium density residential uses. Property is described as being a 14.25 acre tract of land out of a 91.594 acre tract of land as recorded in Document No. 2012060691, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas, |Vuabad approximately 26Ofeet south of Northwest Boulevard (F&1 624) between CR 73 and FM188&. K4m. Yankee presented several aerial views of the property and stated the purpose of the change of zoning is to allow construction of an apartment complex. The applicant is proposing a 160-unit gated apartment complex consisting of twenty (20) buildings with eight (8) units each. Aonosm to the site will be from an abutting property zoned "CG-2" fronting on Northwest Boulevard. Ms. Yankee stated the subject property and all adjacent properties are vacant. K4o. Yankee stated five(5) nnUoea were mailed to Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 8.2O15 Page |V. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS— Discussion and Possible Action B. ZONING New Zoning— Item "g° (conL) � owners within the notification area and five (G) noti��� ��nym�i|edhmovvn�rsoutsidethenot�oahonanaa` ' and nonotices were returned. Ms. Yankee stated Staff recommends approval ofthe requested change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 0 District tothe^RK4-1^ Multifamily 1 District. Ms. Yankee continued that multifamily development on the subject property would provide a transitional land use against future single-family development and would provide a higher density of residential units closer to commercial uses onNorthwest Boulevard (FM S24). Vice Chairman Villarreal opened the OuVr for comments and discussion by commissioners, Commissioner Baugh asked Jthe applicant owned the property that would allow access onto FM824and � Ms. Yankee stated yes, and also, the property will have tobeplatted. � Commissioner Williams asked if there was sewer available to the property and Ms. Yankee stated there was o sewer main on FM 1889 and Mr. Dimas added that there was no service off of FM 024. Commissioner Williams asked who will pay for installing the sewer line and Mr. Dimas stated that otsome point. the City may be able to participate in an off-site project, but the applicant can possibly request m waiver if providing sewer service is not feasible. Mr. Dimas continued the availability ufsewer service will befully reviewed during the platting process. After all comments and discussion concluded by commissioners, Vice Chairman Villarreal opened the public hearing with no one coming forward and the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for amotion. Motion to approve the change of zoning from the"RS-6"Single-Family 6 District to the "RIM-1" Multifamily 1 District was made by Commissioner Lippincott and seconded by Commissioner Brome|ton. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. Ms. Wood read New Zoning Item ^1O^ into record amshown below. Ms. Wood stated the subject property was located within the boundaries of the PorUAirporUVio|etArea Development Plan and is the proposed change of zoning is consistent with both the adopted Future Land Use Plan and the area development plan, 10. Case No. O915~$2—D. LJohnson: Achange ofzoning from the"|L^ Light Industrial District to the "IL/SP" Light Industrial District with a Special Permit for a heavy industrial use (concrete batch plant), not resulting in a change to Future Land Use Plan. Property is described as being Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Rhew Industrial Tracts Unit 1, located on the east side of Rhew Road approximately 1,000 feet south of Leopard Street. Ms.Wood presented several aerial views of the property and stated the purpose of the change of zoning is toallow for aconcrete batch plant; which is considered a heavy industrial use. Ms. Wood continued that heavy industrial uses are permitted in the "IL" Light Industrial District with a Special Permit. Ms.Wood stated the applicant is proposing to operate a temporary concrete batch plant on site; which will baapproximately fifty-four (G4)feet inheight. Ms. Wood explained that the word ''temporary^ referenced � with a concrete batch plant refers to the portability of the plant itself. K8m. Wood stated in the revised conditions that were read into record associated with the change of zoning, the amount of concrete that could be produced per day was increased from 500h» 600 cubic yards and the hours of operation was changed from to Planning Commission . Regular Meeting September 9. 2O15 Page |V. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEKOS—Disoussion and Possible Action B. ZONING New Zoning— Item "1¢° (cont.) Ms.Wood stated eight(8) notices were mailed to owners within the notification area, one(1) notice was mailed outside the area and three(3)were returned infavor. Ms.Wood stated recommended approval � of the change of zoning from the ^|L^ Light Industrial District to the "IL/SP" Light Industrial District with o � Special Permit subject tVnine(Q)conditions. After Staff's presentation, the floor was opened for comments and discussion bycommissioners. � Commissioner Baugh asked if there were any requirements for maintaining the streets because of � the heavy equipment and trucks that would be traveling onand off the property and Ms. Wood stated no. � CommieoionerChupe asked about the speed limit on this road and the applicant responded it was 40 miles � per hour, After further comments and discussion by commissioners oonduded, the public hearing was opened. Ramiro K4uhoz. 381OAndrea Lane, addressed the commission. Mr. K8uhozstated there will betwo to three 18-wheelers that would be entering and departing the plant transporting aggregate sand. Commissioner Chupe stated the reason he was asking about the road was because his company is working � with the Texas Department of Transportation on installing some type of striping on the road entrance to the � plant that the larger 18-vvhee|ermwill betraveling. After all comments and discussion concluded, the public | hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for amotion. Motion boapprove the change ofzoning from the^|L^ � Light Industrial District to the ^|L/SP^ Light Industrial District with a Special Permit subject to the nine (Q) conditions as revised, was made by Commissioner Braselton and seconded by Commissioner Lippincott. Ms.Yankee read New Zoning Item ^1\^ into record aoshown below. Ms.Yankee stated the subject � property lmplanned for medium density residential uses. Ma. Yankee continued the proposed change mf � zoning to the"ON" Office District is not consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Plan. 11. Case No. 0915-03—TKVFPartners, LLC: Achange ofzoning from the'`RyW-1" � K4ukihami|y1 District to the "ON" Office District, resulting in a change hothe Futuna Land Use Plan from medium density residential to professional office uses. Property is described as being Lot 1 1-D, Block 4, Parkdale Village, located on the southwest corner nfMildred Drive and VVhataburgerWay. Ms. Yankee presented several aerial views of the property and stated the purpose of the change of zoning is to allow development of professional office use. Ms. Yankee continued the applicant is proposing to either sell or lease the property that can be used for an office for an inmurance, medical or legal use. Ms. Yankee stated the applicant isthe owner ofall ofthe property fronting onto VVhatehurger Way and has constructed a parking lot on adjacent properties with access onto the private street. Ms. Yankee stated the proposed rezoning would not negatively impact the adjacent residential properties, even though it is not consistent with the Future Land Use Plan's designation of a medium density residential use. Ms. Yankee continued that a commercial driveway onto Mildred Drive will most likely happen which would oracde additional non-residential traffic into the neighborhood, but traffic of office uses is often minimal. Ms. Yankee stated twenty-two (22) notices were mailed to owners within the notification area, five (5) tnowners outside the notification area and no notices were received. K4a. Yankee continued Staff recommends approval of the change of zoning from the ^RK4-1^ Multifamily 1 District to the "ON" Office District. After Staff's presentation concluded, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. f I Planning Commission Regular Meeting r; September 9,2015 r Page 7 f IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS—Discussion and Passible Action B. ZONING t r New Zoning— Item `°11" (cont.) Commissioner Williams asked what was the existing zoning and Ms. Yankee stated the property was currently zoned for a multifamily use. Vice Chairman Villarreal asked about the proposed driveway on Mildred Drive and whether the applicant could use the existing driveway. Ms. Yankee stated the existing driveway could be used, but the driveway would have to be in compliance with commercial driveway standards. Commissioner Braselton stated he lived in that neighborhood at one time and he understood t the concerns of the home owners in the subdivision. After all comments and discussion by commissioners x concluded, the public hearing was opened. r r Myron Grossman,446 Robert Drive: Mr.Grossman stated he was the representative for the owner. Mr. Grossman continued that 95 percent of the property surrounding this site is commercial and this property would add to what currently exists. Mr. Grossman stated a dental, insurance or a doctor's office t would be a great use for this property. Mr. Grossman continued the Whataburger building is now a medical facility and the requested change of zoning would complete this small portion of property. James Bures, 4510 Mildred Drive: Mr. Bures stated the rezoned property would be directly in front of his home. Mr. Bures stated he has been in his home for forty(40)years and he is very concerned about what the addition of another commercial use would do to their neighborhood. Mr. Bures stated expressed concern regarding the ability to enter and leave the subdivision. Mr. Bures continued that Whataburger Way was closed and the eastern end of the street was turned to a right-turn only. The subject property is already located at a dead-end street. Mr. Bures stated there is also a problem with the trash dumpsters G that are located at the end of Whataburger Way and the only entrance would be the one that fronts his property. Mr. Bures continued that several lots along his street were previously rezoned to a commercial use to allow for a parking lot. Mr. Bures stated he was opposed to the requested change of zoning. r Juan Menchaca, 4506 Mildred Drive: Mr. Menchaca voiced his concerns regarding the change of zoning and felt if the zoning was approved, property valuations would be lowered and the overall impact to the neighborhood would not be good. Mr. Menchaca stated concerns with utility line breaks as a result of the new Walgreens and that he was also opposed to the requested change of zoning. After all comments and discussion concluded, the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for a motion. Motion to approve the change of zoning from the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "ON" Office District was made by Commissioner Chupe and seconded by Commissioner Baugh. After the motion was on the floor, further comments and discussion ensued. r Commissioner Williams asked if there was a height restriction and Ms. Yankee stated the height of the structure could be up to 45 feet. Commissioner Williams asked what the maximum was that could be t constructed with a parking lot and Ms.Yankee stated that none-story or atwo-story building could possibly y be constructed. r Commissioner Braselton stated he once lived in this neighborhood and he did not think the change n of zoning would be good for the neighborhood. Commissioner Braselton continued that with the existing zoning being multifamily, there are still a lot of things that can be done with the current zoning like a duplex y use. After further discussion and comments concluded, Vice Chairman Villarreal called for a roll call vote. I f r f I Planning Commission Regular Meeting September B. 2O15 Page N/. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA |TEKOS— Discussion and Possible Action B. ZONING New Zoning—Item °11" (oont.) Motion passed with Commissioners BauAh, Chupe. Hovdaand Vice Chairman Villarreal voting yes, Commissioners Bnasm|tun. Lippincott and Williams voting no and Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner CruUabsent. Planned Unit Development Ms. Yankee read Planned Unit Development Item ^12^ into record aashown below. Ms. Yankee stated the subject property is planned for medium density residential uses. Ms. Yankee continued the proposed change ofzoning tothe "F{S'TN/PU[)/|O^Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay and Island Overlay isconsistent with the adopted Future Land Use Plan. 12. Case No. 0915~04—Padre Island Coastal Homes, LLC: Achange ofzoning from the ~FlS-6/|OSingle Family 6District with mnOverlay tmthe~F<S-TH/PUb/|(]^Townhouse District with o Planned Unit Development Overlay and an Island {}vmr|ay, not resulting in a change to the Future Land Use Plan. Property is described as being Lots 6 and 7, Block 3, Padre Island-Corpus Christi Section E' located on the south side ofRunning Light Drive. Ms. Yankee presented several aerial views of the property and stated the purpose of the change ofzoning ietVallow construction ofotownhouse development ofsix (6) units. Ms. Yankee continued the applicant's intent is to use the units for individually ownership and as daily rental tovvnhomes. Ms. Yankee stated the layout of the townhouse development slightly deviates from the standard subdivision requirements,- therefore, the developer is using a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which will � commit them to a site plan that cannot be significantly changed without a public hearing. K4a. Yankee stated twenty-five (25) notices were mailed in owners within the notification area and five (5) tuowners outside the notification area and two (2) notices were received totaling Q.3G percent opposed with noreason stated. Ms.Yankee continued Staff recommends approval ofthe change ofzoning from the ''RS-S/|(]^ Single-Family 0 District with an Island Overlay tothe ''RS-TH/PUD/|0'' Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay and Island Overlay subject to ten (10) conditions which were read into record. After Staff's presentation concluded, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. Commissioner BnaaeKonasked how the proposed PUD would meet the required number ofparking spaces and also meet the 44percent open space. Ms. Yankee stated the parking will beunder the units and the water will bepart ofthe open space. Vice Chairman Villarreal asked who will enforce no parking on the private streets and will the City be able to enforce the parking associated with the short-term rentals. K4m. Yankee stated City Code Enforcement staff will enforce the parking. After all comments and discussion by commissioners concluded, the public hearing was opened with noone coming forward and the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman called for amotion. Motion to approve the change ofzoning from the ^RS-0/|[)^ Single Family 6 District with an Island Overlay to the "RS-TH/PUD/10" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay and an |a|ond Overlay was made byCommissioner Chupeand seconded by CommieaionerHovdo. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner CruUabsent. Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 9,2015 Page 9 IV. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS— Discussion and Possible Action B. ZONING Planned Unit Development—Item "12" (cont.) Mr. Dimas read Planned Unit Development Item 13"into record as shown below. Mr. Dimas stated the plat satisfied all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and the Technical Review Committee recommends approval. 13. 0615087-P019(15-22000023) RUNNING LIGHT PUD (FINAL REPLAT—0.58 ACRE) Located north of Whitecap Boulevard and west of Leeward Drive. After Staff's presentation, the floor was opened for comments and discussion by commissioners. There being none, the public hearing was opened with no one coming forward and the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Villarreal called for a motion. Motion to approve Planned Unit Development Item "13" was made by Commissioner Chupe and seconded by Commissioner Braselton. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Crull absent. Vice Chairman Villarreal recessed the meeting at 6:40 p.m. for a short break due to the expected length of the meeting. The meeting resumed at 7:05 p.m. V. DISCUSSION ACTION ON PLAN CC COMPREHENISIVE PLAN 2035 (PRESENTED AT THE AUGUST 12 AUGUST 26, 2015 MEETINGS) Ms.Yankee stated at the August 26, 2015 meeting,the commission requested Staff to review again Comments 6 and 11 for rewording and to be presented at the September 9, 2015 meeting. Ms. Yankee continued that at the last meeting, review of the commissioners' comments ended at Comment 28. For commission approval, Staff will be presenting commissioners' Comments 6 and 11 and Comments 29 through 65 for approval. Comment 6: Element 3— Resource Efficiency: Goal 4: "Add "clean-energy" First Policy - Edited the goal to read: "Make renewable and clean-energy options available to homes and businesses." Second Policy edited by adding: "Ensure residents and businesses are aware of the energy options available to them." Motion to approve Staff's recommendations for Comment 6 as revised was made by Commissioner Braselton and seconded by Commissioner Hovda. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Crull absent. Comment 11: Goal 8: Goal was edited to read: "The design of new developments promotes a broader sense of neighborhood and community rather creating isolated developments with a lack of interconnection. bd' xes-de4ge4-. Planning Commission � Regular Meeting � September Q.2O15 � Page 10 V. DISCUSSION ACTION gNPLAN CC CC3|NPREHEN|S[VEPLAN 2835 (PRESENTED AT THE AUGUST 12 AUGUST 26. 2015MEETINGS) (cmnt.) Motion to approve Staff's recommendations for Comment 11 as revised was made by Commissioner Huvdoand seconded byCommissioner Chupa. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner CruUabsent. Comment 2Q- Element 8— Futuna Land Use, Zoning and Urban Design — First phrase was revised to read: "Corpus Christi's grown has revitalized older parts of the oih/ and established new neighborhoods in the south side and northwest areas—" Motion to approve Staff's recommendation for Comment 29 as revised was made by Commissioner Lippincott and seconded by Commissioner Baugh. W1cdiVn passed with Chairman Ramirez and CVmmiasionerCruU absent. Comment 30 - Page 37' Future Lend Use DeOnitionm — Tranoihon District: Chairman Ramirez was concerned with the term "Transition District," and requested Staff to change the phrase"leave this area" to "relocate bmanother anma.,' Staff recommended the change as suggested. Motion to approve the recommendation for Comment 30 as revised was made by Commissioner Lippincott and seconded by Commissioner Baugh. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. Regarding Comment 31, Commissioner Bnaoe|ton stated concern with "promoting" infill in that the City would push for it and stated that it is hard to find enough land available for redevelopment to build houses. Regarding Commissioner's Cru|| comment on the "Transition Districts," Staff did not recommend m change, but noted that the Transition District implies more planning work would be needed for these areas. Regarding Commissioner's Brame|ton comment on lofty goals and ooet. Staff did not recommend a chmnge, but stated comprehensive plans do not have costs associated with their ideas. Commissioner Brao*|ton stated that businesses make a plan and it starts with a budget. Commissioner Lippincott added that the plan's goals are something to aim for. Further discussion Vonurred, but no change isrecommended. Comment 45 - Bement 2— Natural Systems, Parks & Recreation: Goal 8—Staff recommended recommended adding "And beaches" in the goal and policy bullet No. 1. Goal: Perkn, Policy was revised: "Provide adequate resources for basic maintenance and operation of all parkm, spaces, as discussed in the Parks and Recreation Master P|an, and enforcement of City regulations that protect the quality of these public spaces." Motion to approve the recommendation for Comment 45 as revised was made byCommissioner Chupe and seconded by Commissioner Braee|ton. K4ohnn passed with Chairman Ramirez and CommimmionerCru|| absent. Comment 4G— Element 4: Housing &Neighborhoods: Page 2O. Add toGoal 6. 3rd bullet point—"To keep them safe and free from crime. Motion to approve Comment 46 as revised was made by Commissioner Hovda and seconded by CummiemionerChupe. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner CruUabsent. Planning Commission Regular Meeng September Q.2O15 Page 11 V. DISCUSSION ACTION K3N PLAN CC COK8PREHEN|S|VE PLAN 2Q35 (PRESENTED AT THE AUGUST 12AUGUST 26^ 2o15MEETINGS) (oont) Comment 47 - Bement 5—Diversifying the Eonnomy& Strengthening the Workforce: Page 24, Add toGoal 5 — Develop partnership between industry and |ome| education systems hmdevelop programs that provide training necessary h) meet the demands. Staff recommended no change because Goal 5 was covered inGoal 6' 4th bullet. Comment 49 — Bement 7 —Community Infrastructure, Facilities & Services: Staff recommended rewording amfollows: ^Bui|dinga, facilities and open mpacea, both public and privoha, company with all laws and regulations re-garding accessibility for persons with disabilities as required"was added and ADAstandards" �.vasg deleted. Motion to approve Staff's recommendation for Comment 49 as revised by was mad* by Commissioner Hovda and seconded byCommissioner Braaekon. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. Comment 50 regarding underground electrical service: Page 30. Goal 9 was withdrawn by CommiamionerBrone|ton. Regarding Comment 51 by Commissioner Bramekon, Staff orthe Planning Commission did not recommend a change to the idea of having"high quality design standards for private development." Staff explained that standards are developed through public processes in adopting zoning regulations and that design standards are more about creating ahigh quality public realm through commercial development standards. Comment 52: Page 33, Lend Use Principles: Staff recommended adding the phase "Promote the location of multifamily development where there is nearby aocaem to retail services and public tranaportation...~ Motion to approve Staffs recommendation for Comment 52 as remised was made by � CommimeionerBraoe|ton and seconded byCommissioner Baugh. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez � and Commissioner{}ru|| absent. � � Comment 53, Page 33: Land Use Principles under Mixed Use Centera— Staff recommended to change '^provide" to "pmommote" rather than ho ^accept.^ � K8Vhon to approve Staffs recommendation for Comment 53 as revised was made by Commissioner Brase|ton and seconded by Commissioner Lippincott. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner CruUabsent, Comment 54 — Page 33: Land Use Principles under Efficient Development Patterns: Planning Commission discussedand deleting "leapfrog." Staff did not agree with this recommendation. Motion tVapprove the recommendation for Comment 54am revised was made by Commissioner Braea|tVn and seconded by Commissioners Lippincott. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and CommismionarCru|| absent. Comment 55—Page 33, Land Use Principles under Efficient Development Patterns—fourth bullet point — "Use annexation powerslot &0 to promote orderly and efficient development |nthe ETJ. Planning Commission Regular Meeting September Q. 2O15 Page 12 V. DISCUSSION ACTION gNPLAN CC CO0|PFtEHEN|S|VE PLAN 2035 (PRESENTED AT THE AUGUST 12AUGUST 26. 2015MEETINGS) (cont.) Staff recommended no change based on Comment 55 and to leave the deleted phrase in place. Staff recommended no change based on Comment 55 and to leave the deleted phrase in place. After a brief discussion by commissioners regarding Stuff's recommendation to leave the original wording in p|aoy. Vice Chairman called for a roll call vote Motion to approve deleting the phrase "combined with minimum lot size in zoning and infrastructure policy" from Comment 55 was made by Commissioner Brase|ton and seconded by Commissioner Lippincott. Motion passed with Commissioners Baugh, Brome|ton. Lippincott and Williams voting yes, Vice Chairman Villarreal, Commissioners Chupaand Hovdovoting noand Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. Comment 56—Page 33, Land Use Principles under"Environment and Resilience"—second bullet point: "Preserve public land around creeks and drainage . . . |and.^ Staff recommended nochange. After ebrief discussion, Vice Chairman called for amotion. Motion | | toapprove the recommendation for Comment 56 by revising the sentence by inserting "public" after Preserve was made byCommissioner Bnaee|hon. Motion died due tolack ofasecond. Comment S7 — Page 36^ Futuna Land Use Definitions: Single Family is one (1) house per lot. All others are variations of Multi-Family i.e. low density(2-4 units) medium density(8-20 units)etc, Motion to approve Staff's recommendation for Comment 57 as presented was made by Commissioner Bnaae|tmn and seconded by Commissioner Lippincott. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. Comment 58 — Page 50 — Add some specific language with regard to the periodic review by city leaders. Estab ish a ea. to r view and-update-the plan on annual k­;� i ; ,;__ 'k-+ + Fm (annual),-m4d­terni44-yearo-�and 1-S sp-4i-objeQUves- Staff recommended to a"" " r~'^x to `^o~' 2: '^~`'e`` and update the r'a'' on an a'^'u~ basis, 'd~''~'y^'g short- term, medium-term and long-term goals with specific objectives." ''—^tenn, mned|umm-tennand |ong-tenngoa|smithspsc|hcmbdect|ves." � Motion to approve Staffs recommendation for Comment 58 as presented was made by � Commissioner Hovdaand seconded byCommissioner Chupe. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and � Commissioner Cru|| absent. Comments 59 through O@ were presented by Staff — no changes were made. Commissioners concurred with Staff's recommendations and novote was taken. Ms.Yankee stated that Pages 20 through 23 on the Planning Comm issioners'comment sheet were Staff's recommendations based Vnthe public comments. Ms.Yankee read Comments 1. 4. 13 and 18into record. Comments 25 through 38were presented by power point presentation. After Staff's presentation oonduded, the floor was opened for comments and discussion bycommissioners. After further discussion concluded, Vice Chairman Villarreal called for o motion. Motion toapprove Staff's recommendations for Public Comments 1 through 38 was made by Commissioner Brase|tonand seconded byCommissioner Hovda. Motion passed with Chairman Ramirez and Commissioner Cru|| absent. 1 Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 9, 2015 Page 13 VL DIRECTOR'S REPORT f I � J No report J 1 VII. ITEMS TO BE SCHEDULED � None { VII. ADJOURNMENT i There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. i aniel M. GriVvices o, q .E., Director Date)Dev a Williams Date. I Development Department lopment Services e, rtment Secretary to Planning Commission rding Secretary 'j l `s l I I I1 l f. j i i 1 1 I I f (K:DEVSVCS\SMARED\1.PLANNING COMMISSION\2015 PC'\2015 MINLI ES\090915PCMINS) f 0 1