Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 03/23/2005 OA Minutes 31 A ° G ` Regular Planning Commission Meeting �1q� Wednesday—March 23,2005 ry .T4 cP 5:30 P.M. ry MAY 2005 A RECEIVED ti g CRY SECRETARY'S Commissioners: $ OFFICE gri David Berlanga,Chairman , � 220Z61111.O2 Bryan Stone,Vice Chairman Rudy Garza Shirley Mims Michael Pusley Fred Braselton Eloy H. Salazar Richard Smith Robert Zamora Commissioners Absent: Robert Zamora Staff: Michael N. Gunning,AICP, Assistant Director of Development Services Mary Frances Teniente, PE,Assistant Director of Development Services Priscilla San Miguel,Recording Secretary Sylvia Carrillo-Arispe, City Planner Miguel Saldafia,AICP, City Planner Joseph Hamey,Assistant City Planner CALL TO ORDER A quorum was declared and the meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Braselton and seconded by Commissioner Smith to accept the March 10, 2005 minutes with the correction reflecting Commissioner Salazar as present. PLATS 1. Continued Plats Mr. Saldana read the following plats A thru E into the record and stated the applicants' representatives were requesting a continuance of two weeks. Staff recommended a continuance of two weeks. a. 0205012-P05 Brighton Park Baptist Church(Final—6.67 Acres) SCANNED Located south of Brook Road and east of Airline Road. b. 0205028-NP16 Boat Hole Marina,Block 1, Lot 1 (Final—6.664 Acres) Located between Skipper Lane and Jester Street,west of the Laguna Madre. Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 2 c. 0305036-NP20 Lexington Industrial Center,Lot 26R(Final Replat—2.84 Acres) Located south of South Padre Island Drive(SH 358) and west of Flour Bluff Drive. The public hearing was opened. No one appeared to be in favor or in opposition. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Smith and seconded by Stone to recommend a continuance to the April 6th hearing. The motion was passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. 2. New Plats Mr. Salda0a read the following plat into the record and stated the applicants' representative is requesting a continuance of two weeks. Staff recommended continuance of two weeks. a. 0305038-P17 Cayo Place,Block 10, Lot 3 (Final— 1.034 Acres) Located north of Graham Road,west of Flour Bluff Drive. The public hearing was opened. No one appeared to be in favor or in opposition. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Braselton and seconded by Pusley to recommend a continuance to the April 6 hearing. The motion was passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. Mr. Saldana read the following Plats "B" through "G" into the record and stated staff recommended approval. b. 0305039-P18 Padre Island-Corpus Christi, Ports 0' Call, Block 15. Lot 5R (Final Replat—0.364 Acre) Located north side Fortuna Bay Drive, west of Spyglass Drive. c. 0305040-P19 Wood River Unit 15, Block 2, Lot 5R (Final Replat—0.193 Acre) Located south of Bedrock Drive, west of Big Cyprus Bayou Drive, both north of Northwest Boulevard (FM 624). d. 0305042-NP23 Nottarb Place Unit 3,Block 11, Lots 12 & 13 (Final Replat—0.511 Acre) Located west of Kram Road,north of Way-Out Weber Road,west of Weber Road. e. 305043-NP24 Padre Island-Corpus Christi Section B,Block 46, Lot 14A (Final Replat—0.517 Acre) Located east of Leeward Drive, north of Whitecap Boulevard and west of South Padre Island Drive(Park Road 22). f 0305044-NP25 Preston Park Addition. Block t, Lot I (Final—4.970 Acres) Located south of Leopard Street,west of Southern Minerals Road. g. 1204204-NP108R Industrial Technology Park Unit 2,Block 4,Lots I &2 & Block 5,Lot I (Final-8.326 Acres) Located north of Old Brownsville Road and west of South Padre Island Drive(SH 358). 41.0 11110 Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 3 The public hearing was opened. No one appeared to be in favor or in opposition. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Pusley and seconded by Stone to recommend an approval. The motion was passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. 3. Fee Exemption a. Request has been submitted for an exemption from wastewater acreage fees for S & J Estates Subdivision, Block I, Lot 1. Mrs. Teniente provided graphics of the subject property and the surrounding area. Mrs. Teniente stated that the depth of the manhole is such that it cannot be extended per the Allison WasteWater Master Plan that was adopted for that area and that this tract is in turn supposed to be a part of the property or the service area that is fed by this gravity line. Mrs. Teniente also indicated that The City of Corpus Christi Waste Water Department is taking the position that these acreage fees are due and need to be paid. The usage of the said property is a residential structure that is proposed and they would agree to allowing it to go septic. The acreage fees would still be required. Staff is recommending that the acreage fees be paid. In response to Chairman Berlanga's questions, Mrs. Teniente indicated that service would be provided to the area in fifteen (15) years based on the discussion with the WasteWater Department. A reasonable timeframe would be five to ten years, that time frame will vary. It is a function of the Waste Water Department in funding with the CIP program or another larger development coming in and extending a line using reimbursement procedures through our platting ordinance. Chairman Berlanga asked if the situation was not beyond a gravity line and how long would it normally take for a subdivision or homeowner to get services in question?Can the owner receive a refund if services are not provided within that timeframe and can that payment be delayed until services rendered? Mrs. Teniente indicated that in other locations you may have a gravity line that is further away or even closer to it. Within a fifteen (15) year time period they would have an option to request a refund if in fact it does not get extended during that time period. A refund cannot be delayed because it is not a provision of the platting ordinance. In response to Commissioner Braselton question, the sewer fee is $1,209 per acre. It would be approximately$5,000 in this particular situation. Mr. Gunning indicated that trust fees are monies that go into trust funds used by private sector for extensions on various infrastructures. Commissioner Braselton stated that the primary beneficiary of the developer trust fund are large scale developers, not someone building one house on one lot. In response to Chairman Berlanga's questions Mr. Joseph Harney stated that he can recommend the exemption to Council and in turn Council can make a determination based on all the information provided. Chairman Berlanga asks if Mr. James Bickham is in the audience. Mr. Gunning recommends this issue be continued in two weeks,per Mrs. Teniente. A motion was made by Pusley and seconded by Garza for the postponement of the waste water exemption fees of two weeks. The motion was passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. Q Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 4 4. ZONING 1. New Zoning a. Case No. 0305-03: Bob Bair d/b/a Bair's Den: "B-1" Neighborhood Business District to a "B-4" General Business District, resulting in a land use change from a neighborhood business use to a general business use. Koolside Addition, Block 8, Lot 15, Less R.O.W., located along Gollihar Road between Lum Avenue and Airline Road. Request: Change of zoning from"B-1"neighborhood Business District to"B-4"General Business District resulting in a change of an existing restaurant with alcoholic beverages to a bar. Excerpts from Zoning Report Legal Description/Location:Koolside Addition, Block 8, Lot 15, less R.O.W., located along Gollihar Road between Lum Avenue and Airline Road Purpose of Request: To convert the existing restaurant with alcoholic beverages to a bar. Area Development Plan: Southeast-the Southeast Area Development Plan's future land use map supports the continuation of neighborhood business uses for the subject properly and properties along the west side of Airline Road from McArdle road to Lum Avenue. Department Comments: TABC records indicate that Bair's Den was issued a TABC license for alcoholic beverages October 1996. A food and beverage permit for the establishment was expired in 1997 and was not renewed by the owner. The owner/operator was fully aware that a bar was not permitted on subject lot. Staff Recommendation: Denial of the "B-4"General Business District Mrs. Carillo-Arispe provided graphics of the subject property and the surrounding area. The zoning report and tape recording are on file. She stated that there were thirty-seven (37) notices mailed. Two (2) were received in favor and none in opposition. Mrs. Carillo-Arispe stated that the property provides primary access to Meadowbrook Elementary and King High School. The property is also located on Airline Road, which is an arterial roadway. Looking toward the Southeast direction the plan supports the continuation of a "B-1" Neighborhood Business with the subject property and along the eastside of Airline Road from McArdle to Lum Street. In response to Commissioner Pusley's question of an explanation of a special permit use as a bar, Mr. Gunning stated that the applicant requested in lieu of a "B-4" General District Business, which allows the bar, tavern use, a special permit with conditions provided by the Planning Commission as seen appropriate, which would include future change of ownership,etc. Commissioner Pusley indicated that with special permits someone is charged with making sure special permits are not violated. Michael Gunning indicated that it is a land based decision. In 1984 the'B-1"district was amended to eliminate the bar uses. In 1991, the City further modified the "B-1" District to eliminate auto related usage such as auto sales, parts and full service gas stations. This was all in an attempt to respond to community concerns about what type of businesses are most ii `I Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 5 appropriately located when adjacently located to residential or in proximity to residential properties. In response to Chairman Berlanga's question regarding the use of the property prior to 1997, Mrs. Carrillo-Arispe stated that the said property was primarily operating as a restaurant. When the Texas Alcohol and Beverage Commission (TABC) food and beverage permit expired, the owner was aware that he should not continue operating as a bar. In response to Chairman Berlanga's question Mr. Gunning stated that the owner was granted a TABC license to operate as a bar for on premise consumption (beer and wine). The food and beverage permit was apparently replaced with a different type of beverage permit, although it was not clear at this point. Commissioner Pusley reiterated that the staff is not recommending a "B-4" General Business District or Special Permit. The public hearing was opened. James Skrobarczyk, 3410 Floyd, attorney for applicant, distributed copies of an affidavit of a lawsuit filed in federal court. Mr. Skrobarczyk states that the affidavit includes an outline of the facts presented on Mr. Bair's behalf. 1996 Black Diamond Oyster Bar had been closed for four years; Mr. Bair proceeded to open the location as a restaurant. Mr. Bair was unaware of the changes of zoning for taverns, lounges and bars in 1996. Mr. Bair was not in compliance on the day of opening his business. In the nine years of business conducted, no one has ever bothered him nor has he bothered the neighbors. Mr. Bair has stood up for his rights and filed a lawsuit which has now been amended in retaliation to the City for damages. Mr. Bair is requesting a Special Use Permit. If Mr. Bair is put out of business,the city will pay substantial damages. In response to Chairman Berlanga's question regarding zoning, Mr. Skrobarczyk indicated that the City changed the allowances under`B-1"unbeknownst to Mr. Bair. Mr. Harney confirmed that if 51% of gross sales in an establishment are from alcoholic beverages,TABC requires it to be licensed or permitted. Chairman Berlanga stated Mr. Bair knew he was not in compliance with the law. Mr. Harney stated that in 1996 Mr. Bair opened as a restaurant as explained with a concurrent beer and wine license and a food and wine permit. Subsequently in 1997 based on the fact that the operator was not meeting the requirements, the food and beverage permit was revoked by TABC but the owner continued to operate his establishment with the beer and wine license. Mr. Gunning states that since Mr. Bair was not selling enough food, he was not allowed to renew his food and beverage permit. Mr. Skrobarczyk indicates that Mr. Bair filed a bond with TABC in lieu of the food and beverage permit,which is still in place. In response to Chairman Berlanga's question Mr. Skrobarczyk stated that the city was complacent and the city was aware that Mr. Bair was not in compliance. One other claim in the lawsuit against the city is fraud because the city fraudulently induced him to open an establishment. 160 Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 6 Barbara Cline, 921 Dorthy Street, original homeowner, also owns residential property at 906, 910, 917, 934, 938 Dorthy, indicates that she lives and does business in the immediate area. Ms. Cline states that it is totally without conscience to close a man's business on a technicality and is in support of grandfathering in Bair's Den. As long as it is Bair's Den, owned by Bob Bair, it can operate without any problems. Mr. Hamey indicated that the rules have not changed; it is the fact that Mr. Bair does not meet the 25%requirement. Mr. Gunning indicated that this zoning request was a result of the smoking ordinance. Mr. Bair was quoted in saying that 80% of his customers smoke and as a restaurant smoking would not be allowed. His intent is to protect the neighborhood. Approving a'B-4" or a special permit for the use of a "B-4" business will further solidify a general business use in that neighborhood,which is not compatible to residential uses. Gollihar Road is a residential collector between Airline and Staples street. Commissioner Salazar questioned staff about letters of opposition regarding the neighborhood. Mr. Skrobarczyk referenced the City Manager's comparison of his client to someone with pink hair. Mr. Bair is not trying to defy the City Council. It was never his intent Bob Bair, 906 Dorthy Street, owner of Bair's Den, stated that he attempted to open a bar and was told he could not open as a bar but as a restaurant. Nine years later, his establishment looks the same as day one. TABC made him get a bond because he was not selling enough food. In response to Chairman Berlanga, Mr. Gunning suggested that if the Commissioners consider a Special Permit,they should also consider tying the Special Permit to the owner and not the property itself. There are legal issues to be considered when tying a Special Permit to a person and not the land. Commissioner Stone stated that Mr. Bair is not in compliance as a restaurant. If a special permit is not issued, Mr. Bair would need to change his operation to make it more of a restaurant or shutdown. Mr. Gunning indicated that conditions placed on special permits are usually land based conditions and have nothing to do with the conduct of the owner or customers. There are three options; A recommendation could be made to deny the"B-4"outright; deny the"B-4"and in lieu thereof approve a Special Permit for a bar; or approve the "B-4". If the Commissioners consider a Special Permit tied to the owner, or bar, then he recommended the case to be tabled for two weeks to allow the City Attorney's office to provide a written opinion of such a recommendation. Commissioners Salazar and Mims indicated that if an opinion was brought forward,they would like to see case law supporting the opinion. Legal counsel should note standing court cases for comparison. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Pusley and seconded by Garza to table for two weeks. The motion passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 7 b. Case No. 0305-04: Sizemore Real Estate, LLC: "B-4" General Business District to an"1-2"Light Industrial District,resulting in a land use change from a general business use to a light industrial use. River Square Unit I, Block 1, Lots I through 4, located north of 11137 Frontage Road, south of McKenzie Lane and east of Twin River Boulevard. Excerpts from Zoning Report Legal Description/Location:River Square Unit 1, Lots 1 through 4, located north of JH 37 Frontage Road, South of McKenzie Lane and east of Twin River Boulevard Purpose of Request: Development of an office warehouse complex. Area Development Plan:Northwest-The requested "1-2"District is not consistent with the future land use map. The plan recommends commercial development Department Comments: A Special Permit was granted for the subject property in 2001 for warehousing and outdoor storage. Development of the property for the approved use did not occur and the Special Permit has since expired. The proposed Special permit is similar to the one approved in 2001 with the exception of a site plan and structure square footage being added. Staff Recommendation: Denial of the "I-2"Light Industrial District and in lieu thereof approval of a Special Permit subject to a site plan and five(5) conditions. 1. USES: the only uses authorized by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "B-4"General Business District are office warehouse uses, with an office area up to 1,500 square feet and warehouse area up to 3,500 square feet with a maximum eave height of 24 feet. 2. OUTSIDE STORAGE: The outside storage allowed as an accessory use to the primary use located on the same premise and is limited to no more than 30 percent of the premise. All outside storage must be setback a minimum of 20 feet from any public right-of-way. 3. SCREENING: A solid wooden screening fence with a height of not less than six feet must be used to screen the outside storage from view from surrounding public right-of-way and properties. The outside storage shall not extend above the height of the screening fence, except that this limitation does not include machinery equipment. A chain-link fence with slats shall not be considered to be a solid screening fence. 4. LANSCAPING: In addition to compliance with Article 27B, Landscape regulations, the subject property shall include S-gallon oleanders every five feet on center between the outside storage screening fence and the public rights-of-way. All landscaping must be kept in a healthy and growing condition at all times. 5. TIME LIMIT: THIS Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within two(2)years from the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions and City rules and regulations. Request: Change of zoning from"B-4"General Business District to"I-2"Light Industrial District resulting in a development of an office warehouse space. Mrs. Carrillo-Arispe provided graphics of the subject property and the surrounding area. The zoning report and tape recording are on file. She stated that there were 12 notices mailed. One was received in favor and none in opposition. 4r+ 111110 Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 8 Mrs.Carrillo-Arispe stated the that existing land use map shows the subject parcel surrounded by multi-family residential,general business and some of the outer city limits along the industrial corridor. The applicant proposes to build between 8 to 10 separate offices encompassing a space of 5,000 square feet.Each structure will consist of 1,500 square feet of office space and 3,500 square feet of warehouse area with eaves not to exceed height of 24 feet but varying between 18 and 24 feet. Staff recommends a denial of the"1-2"but approval of a Special Permit subject to five(5)conditions for use,outside storage usage,screening, landscaping,and a time limit to the Permit. Specifically, the special permit would allow uses by right in the"B-4"with the exception of the warehouse office use,applicant is requesting outside storage to be permitted as an accessory use but limited to 30%of the premise size. All outside storage must have a setback of a minimum of 20 feet from any public right-of-way with a solid wooden fence screening and landscaping. In addition to that screening,this would provide screening from the multi family and other property around the surrounding area. Time limit with a Special Permit to expire within two years of the date of the ordinance is recommended unless the property is being used as allowed in the conditions. Commissioner Pusley stated that staff submitted site plans with 17 to 25 lots. Staff and applicant stated they have not agreed on one particular site plan. In response to Commissioner Pusley's questions,Mrs. Carrillo-Arispe indicated that the issue with this particular piece of property would be the outside storage. Limiting the use to specific height requirements, setback requirements,and specific uses that are consistent with"B-4"and not"1-2"such as flammables would be allowed in other districts. Commissioner Pusley stated that this is an area that was part of the city's corridor entrance study that was done a few years ago which basically stated that the City was going to try and not bring industrial development into this area because it is the entrance to our City. This is not an area where we want to see commercial development being done. This is immediately across the street from a new elementary school and TMISD has passed two resolutions against this type of development. One of them was done last year on this same piece of property. This is something Staff should not have brought before us. The public hearing was opened. Wayne Lunquist,6700 Everhart, stated that he requested a similar permit three years ago and is agreeable with all the conditions that is included with a special permit except the 30%requirement. The developers are willing to screen an outdoor storage with a wooden fence.They are requesting to approve the"1-2"permit. The developers are 90%agreeable with what staff is recommending. In response to Chairman Berlanga's question regarding types of storage,Mr. Lunquist indicated that many different things can be stored in the warehouse with no item exceeding the 6 foot height requirement. Chairman Berlanga indicated that the TMISD is in opposition of the permit. TMISD was assured that the General Business District would not have a negative impact on the area. Jeff Sizemore, 11810 Warfield, San Antonio,Texas, anticipates service type contractors needing outside storage use. No dangerous chemicals will be stored. There will be no residential property built to the north due to the fact that the property is owned by the City. There will be access from the front of the building through McKenzie Road and Interstate Highway 37 from the back. Commissioner Pusley indicated that there is a new elementary school diagonally across this new proposed site. TMISD forgave back taxes that were owed to the school district to allow the developer to Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 9 come in and develop this piece of property with the understanding that it would not be a detrimental development or a detriment to the school district,or the surrounding neighborhoods as it is one of the most upscale subdivisions in Northwest Corpus Christi other than Wood River. Under the screening guidelines,the screening height is limited and does not include machinery or equipment. This Commission has no control as to who this property can be sold to or future development(what is built there). Mr. Gunning indicated that the"B-4"does not allow warehousing. It allows mini-storage usage and minimum warehousing associated with the retail of a furniture company or other types of establishments. Commissioner Stone stated that if this property is not allowed a Special Permit,the property will just sit there. Office warehouse seems like the best use. Wayne Lunquist indicated that the developers are willing to have uniform setbacks,no storage in front,and it will not be an industrial warehouse. There will not be any metal fronts. Masonry fronts will be on all fronts of the buildings. It will be a nice office warehouse with outside storage,and we are asking for outside storage. In response to Chairman Berlanga's questions, Mr.Lunquist stated that there were some conditions that the applicant was not acceptable with. He would like no more than 30%of the premises for outdoor storage. As an example, 5,000 square foot building is built with only 1500 square foot of outdoor storage on a one acre tract. Mr. Gunning indicated that the 30%would apply to each lot,which could be sold individually. The intent is to develop the market for office warehouse over time,not all at once. The 30%would apply to the property as a whole. In response to Mr.Gunning, Mr. Lunquist indicated that they have no problem with any of the five conditions. Mr. Sizemore indicated that he does not plan to sell to anyone. He would like to build and lease them to tenants. Ms. Sizemore states that he did not understand the two year limitation. The developers are willing to add some of the restrictions spoken of. No storage in the front yard,uniform setbacks,and no metal fronts on buildings(masonry or stucco). Mr. Gunning stated that the two year limitation will benefit the developer. A typical Special Permit is approved and granted for one year. This particular case allows the developer two years to begin construction. Commissioner Pusley stated that this has been a very difficult situation in this area for the TMISD because we live here, and our kids go to school in an industrial area. What is not owned by a refinery is a plowed field or has so many pipelines underground,no one can build there for the next hundred years. Pusley stated that he was part of the committee that searched for sites to build two new schools in the Tuloso Midway residence. Without any assistance from the City, it taxed itself to the tune of 40 million dollars to build those two school buildings. No one assisted in that plan of action. Tremendous sacrifices have been made for the community. The committee went to TXDOT to work with them regarding the flyover to get large vehicles in and out quickly. There are many options for this proposed site such as doctors' offices or professional offices instead of a warehouse complex. In response to Commissioner Salazar's question regarding building codes,Mr.Gunning indicated that there would be no restrictions on the building codes. Under the existing zoning,the developer could not build anything more than 800 square feet under"B-4". The Developer can build a 3500 square foot office and an 800 square foot warehouse. This is allowing him additional footage for the warehouse. Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page 10 In response to Commissioner Salazar, Mr. Sizemore stated that TMISD was given a presentation and passed a resolution to be against what is now Fleet Pride(an international truck dealerships). It was under contract to be built,due to the resolution from TMISD. The owners or Fleet Pride did not want to be involved with that opposition. The contract and zoning application was cancelled. The current owners pulled their request for a zoning change and were not made to pay for closing on the contract. In response to Commissioner Pusley's question,Mr. Lunquist stated that the developer would like to build one street and build as needed or in demand. The developer would like not to put in the street that staff recommended where it would parallel to River Run all the way down since the demand is not known at this time. The Developer would like to put in one cul de sac at a time. The buildings would front Interstate Highway 37,and the storage yards would be screened from Interstate Highway 37. Mr. Gunning stated that he would like to make a recommitment on the Cotton Testing Facility. Interstate Highway 37 is the entry way to our City which we would like to protect. Staff would not like to encourage any"1-2"or Light Industrial zoning further west than what is already indicated. Staff would also like to ask the developer to look at additional landscaping. The property's level is at a higher elevation than Interstate Highway 37 and the screening fences will not screen the parking or warehousing usage. The planting of Oak Trees every 50 feet would cover the area over time. Staff can address the developer's concerns if they file a preliminary plat on the entire piece of property and do a final plat on the lots they want to build.The developer can build a street associated with those lots,without a cul de sac,but with a temporary turn around extended with lots sold and developed in the future. Chairman Berlanga added conditions pursuant to Mr. Lunquist to allow TMISD to agree. These conditions should be: I. Uniform Setback 2. Masonry Fronts 3. No storage in front of buildings 4. Storage screened with taller landscaping such as oak trees every 50 feet(not palms) Mr. Sizemore indicated that he would like to commit to Site Plan C. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made and seconded to deny the"I-2" Light Industrial District and in lieu thereof; approval of a Special Permit subject to site plan C or as determined in the platting process and five(5) conditions. The motion passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. V. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. FUTURE SCHEDULED MEETINGS B. EXCUSED ABSENCES Commissioner Salazar stated that the minutes from March 10, 2005 show him as absent when he was in attendance. Mr. Salazar would like a correction made. Motion was called and seconded,to correct the absence. Motion passed unanimously with Zamora being absent. Planning Commission Meeting March 23,2005 Page II C. OTHER MATTERS VI. PUBLIC HEARING F'Y2005 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The March 16,2005 public hearing for citizens' comments was closed. The Commission recessed the regular meeting at 8:36 p.m. until 8:45 p.m. The Commission reconvened the public meeting on formulating their recommendations for the FY 2005 Consolidated Annual Action Plan that includes the CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds. VII. ADJOURNMENT POSTING STATEMENT: This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board in the Leopard Street entry foyer, 1201 Leopard Street at AM/PM on ,2005. ��1� tor-o- -mots Michael Gunning Priscilla San Miguel j Assistant Director of Recording Secre olfr Development Services Development Services