Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 08/29/2001 it Planning Commission Meeting August 29,2001 Commissioners Present: David Berlanga,Chairman Shirley Mims,Vice Chairman Neill F.Amsler Michael Pusley Eloy H.Salazar Richard Smith Robert Zamora Commissioners Absent: Elizabeth Chu Richter Brooke Sween-McGloin Staff Present: Michael N.Gunning,AICP, Director of Planning Lucinda P.Beal,Recording Secretary Miguel S.Saldana,AICP,City Planner Harry J.Power,City Planner Doyle Curtis,Assistant City Attorney Leo Farias,P.E.,Special Services Engineer CALL TO ORDER Chairman Berlanga declared a quorum and called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. NON PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS PRESENTATION—Discussion Regarding Revising the Sign Ordinance Minis arrived at 5:34 p.m. Mr. Gunning informed the Commission that Staff is attempting to address issues facing Staff and the Commission regarding change of zoning to request additional signage. The proposed amendment to the "AB" Professional Office District would allow a 20 square foot monument sign not exceeding six(6)feet in height. Commissioner Minis referenced the sign ordinance for Lubbock, Texas. She said that Lubbock sets a height limitation on all signs regardless of where they are located. In response to Commissioner Pusley,Mr. Saldafia said that the conditional sign permit would be eliminated with the inclusion of the sign regulations into the "AB" District. Mr. Saldafia provided the Enclave business complex as an example of a tastefully constructed monumental sign for a business complex. Commissioner Pusley expressed concern with a monument sign that could be six (6) feet high and 20 square feet and be unsightly. He suggested separating the zoning and signage. Mr. Salda0a responded by saying that language could be included in the"AB"District to require a setback and landscaping for the signs that would be aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Gunning stated that separating zoning and signage would require a complete rewrite of the ordinance and that funding would require City Council approval. Commissioner Zamora expressed concern with a height limitation of six(6)feet not being high enough and suggested that the conditional sign permit be available to applicants and reviewed by the Commission on a case by case basis. He also suggested that language be included regarding materials that could be used to build the sign. Mr.Gunning stated that most construction material for signs is compatible with adjoining residential neighborhoods. He read the provision of the criteria for building products to be used to build the signs. Mr. Saldafia said that language could be included to require a six(6)foot tall sign beginning at the property line with the height increasing as the sign is set back further into the lot. Mr. Gunning said that staff would continue to review the "AB" District with suggestions provided by the Commission and schedule an additional hearing on September 26,2001. SCANNED 4/0 v0) ' Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 Page 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Previously Continued Minutes-July 18,2001 and August 1,2001 Motion by Pusley, seconded by Salazar, to approve July 18 and August 1, 2001 minutes. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. Current Minutes-August 15,2001 Motion by Amsler, seconded by Mims, to approve August 15,2001 minutes. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. EXCUSED ABSENCES Chairman Berlanga requested an excused absence for the August 15, 2001 meeting. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Salazar, to approve an excused absence for Chairman Berlanga. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. FUTURE SCHEDULED MEETINGS Mr. Gunning informed the Commission that zoning changes for proposed annexation areas would be held on October 10, 2001. He continued that the Commission could not make recommendations regarding annexation only zoning. Mr. Gunning said that he was attempting to schedule an appointment with Mr. Gary Mater for a follow-up retreat some time in September. OTHER MATTERS Chairman Berlanga informed the Commission that he met with Mayor Lloyd Neal to discuss scheduling of a meeting between the Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission would have an opportunity to inform the Council about issues facing the Commission and to request direction from the Council. He continued that the meeting would not be scheduled until after the Commission has met with Mr. Mater at the follow-up retreat. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS PLATS New Plats a. 080175-P31 Calallen Subdivisio Block 10 Lots 11A& I2A Final Re.lat—0.344 Acre Located south of Mountain Trail and west of Avenue C. Mr.Power said that Staff recommends approval of the plat as submitted. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Ron Voss, Jr., 3002 Cedar Springs, said that his client would be building a residential home on the property. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Minis, seconded by Salazar, to approve the plat as submitted. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. 1100 • Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 Page 3 b. 080178-P33 King's Crossing Unit 13 (Final— 10.77 Acres) Located south of Yorktown Boulevard and east of South Staples Street(F.M.2444). Commissioner Amsler abstained from participation of the plat and left the room. Mr.Power said that Staff recommends approval of the plat as submitted. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Zamora, to approve the plat as submitted. Motion passed with Amsler abstaining and Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. c. 080179-P34 Nueces Gardens No.2,Lot 63B (Final Replat—0.447 Acre) Located southeast of Starlight Lane,southwest of the intersection of Sunny Drive. Mr.Power said that Staff recommends approval of the plat as submitted. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Zamora,seconded by Amsler,to approve the plat as submitted. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. * * * * * * * * Plats d and e(Bluntzer Acres)were considered as a group. d. 080183-NP48 Bluntzer Acres,Block 1,Lots 1 &2,O.C.L. (Preliminary—50.53 Acres) Located east of County Road 57 and approximately one-half mile south of State Highway 44. e. 80184-NP49 Bluntzer Acres Block 1,Lot 1,O.C.L. (Final—1.00 Acre) Located east of County Road 57 and approximately one-half mile south of State Highway 44. Mr. Power said that the applicant's engineer was requesting a two-week continuance to complete requirements of the plat and the Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Mims, to approve a two-week continuance to the September 12, 2001 meeting. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. * * r* * ** * f. 080185-NP50 Corpus Christi Industrial District Section 2,Block 9,Lot X-3 (Final Reolat—6.29 Acres) Located between Baldwin Boulevard on the west and Airport Road on the east, south of Agnes Street (S.H.44). it rl ' Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 Page 4 Mr.Power said that Staff recommends approval of the plat as submitted. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Mr. Chuck Urban said that his client, Horton Automatic, to clean up the existing little lots which have closed utility easements and create one large lot. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Mims, seconded by Pusley, to approve the plat as submitted. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. Time Extension a. 099794-NP33 Sunbelt Industrial Park,Block 4,Lot 2 (Final—2.252 Acres) Located west of Navigation Boulevard between Leopard Street and Agnes Street. Mr. Power said that the applicant's engineer was requesting a six-month time extension. He said that since the request would be the eighth request,staff recommends denial of a six-month time extension. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Commissioner Salazar requested that the Commission approve the time extension with the condition that there would not be another extension approved. He continued that this has been the practice of the Commission in the past. Motion by Amsler, seconded by Pusley, to deny the time extension request. Motion passed with Salazar voting"Nay"and Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. ZONING CASES Continued Zoning Case Murray Bass,Jr.: 0801-05 REQUEST: "AB" Professional Office District to"B-4" General Business District on Bent Tree Unit 2, Block 7, Lot 5, located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Cimarron Boulevard. Mr. Saldana informed the Commission that the applicant requested an additional two(2)weeks to discuss alternatives to a"B-4"General Business District for the subject property. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Frank Delaney, 2809 Chapel View, asked that the case not be continued. He said that the Bent Tree Subdivision homeowners were in opposition to the rezoning request for "B-4" District. Mr. Delaney presented a petition and asked to have a representative present to provide input during future discussions between Mr. Bass and City staff regarding the subject property. Mr. Gunning agreed to provide information regarding all future meetings and asked for the name of a contact person to represent the neighborhood. He continued that due to the nature of the meetings being preliminary to development he did not believe input from the neighborhood at this time would be necessary. Ms.Donnan, 2805 Chapel View,should be notified earlier if it is going to be requested to continue for two (2)weeks and asked that Mr.Bass be given a deadline to complete his plans. f✓ - Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 Page 5 Jerry Van Beveren,5938 Harvest Hill,asked that the Commission respect the zoning ordinance in place. Mr. Gunning explained that Staff does not notify residents of cases being requested for continuance until the Commission has taken action on the request. Public hearing was closed. Commission discussed a requirement to a time limit for Mr.Bass to complete his plans for presentation to the Planning Commission for September 26,2001. Commissioner Salazar said that he was in favor of providing a deadline,but could not support the requested "B-4"District rezoning. Chairman Berlanga said that he could not support the requirement of a time limit for the zoning case, but could not support the"B-4"District. He explained that circumstances could arise which would prevent the applicant from meeting the deadline imposed by the Commission. Commissioner Amsler said the deadline would require the applicant to work toward a goal; however, the deadline could be moved. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Amsler, to continue the case to the September 26, 2001 meeting and additional continuances would not be approved. Motion passed with Berlanga and Mims voting "Nay" and Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. New Zoning Cases Dionicio Garza,Jr. 0801-10 REQUEST: "AB" Professional Office District and "14-1B" One-family Dwelling District to 'B-I" Neighborhood Business District on Sunnyside Strip, Lots 14-B and 15 and Claremont Place, Block I, Lot 1, located on the north side of Jacquelyn Drive, between Everhart Road and Sam Street. Mr. Saldafia presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area.He said that the subject property is part of a 7.27-acre tract of land zoned an "AB" District that is developed with a mixture of offices and beauty shops from Jacquelyn Drive to Harry Street along Everhart Road. To the east, there are 2,496 acres of land zoned an"14-1B"District and developed with single-family residences. West of the subject property,there is a 3.08-acre tract of land that is zoned an"R-IB"District and developed with a private school and community center. Also to the west, are two (2) tracts of land that are zoned a"B-I" District of which one tract contains 0.39 acre and developed with lift station and another tract contains a 0.48 acre that is part of a retail establishment. South of the subject property, there are 89 acres of land zoned a "B-4"District that are developed with mixture of restaurants,offices,retail stores,and a manufacturing facility with a Special Permit Mr. Salda0a said that there was a request for a change of zoning from "AB" District to "B-1" District pending for Imte's Skin Care Salon, Case - 0801-02, located north of the subject property at 745 Everhart Road, Suite B. The applicant plans to include the sale of skin care products and jewelry and to allow for a larger sign.The Planning Commission Public Hearing was held on August I, 2001, whereby staff recommended denial and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the zoning change. Final action is pending before the City Council on September 11,2001. He added that in January 1998,Lot B-4,South Staples Center,located on the east side of Everhart Road,on the north side of South Staples Street and south of the subject property, was denied a change of zoning to an "1-2" District,and in lieu thereof,was granted a Special Permit for a resistor plant. In September 1998, Lot 1, Block 32, Pope Place 5, located on the northwest corner of Harry Street and Everhart Road,northwest from the subject property,the Planning Commission denied a change of zoning from an "R-1B"District to an"R-2"District. In November 1998,the applicant withdrew the request. ' Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 Page 6 Mr. Saldafia said that the applicant has requested a change of zoning from an "AB" Professional Office District to a"B-1"Neighborhood Business District to comply with the zoning ordinance to allow for retail sale of beauty products,existing signage and for the expanded parking lot.The"AB"District does not permit the storage of merchandise in the building or on the premise. Therefore, retail sales in an "AB" District is not permitted. The subject property is in an area that is zoned an "AB" District and developed with uses permitted in this zoning district, such as dental clinics, hair salons, realtor's office and medical clinics. The property has direct access to an arterial,Everhart Road, without traversing a residential area. However,it does back-up to an established residential area. North of the subject property, approximately 450 feet north of Harry Street, in August 1995, one lot was granted a change of zoning from an"R-1B"One-family Dwelling District to a"B-I"District and in August 2000,a "B-IA" District on the adjacent lot to the north was approved. However, approximately 200 feet north of Harry Street, in November 1999, three (3) lots were denied a change of zoning to a "B-I" District, but were granted an "AB"District with a Special Permit for a consignment store. The area north of Harry Street has been going through a transition from residential to non-residential uses. The area south of Harry Street has remained constant for the past fifteen(15) years. Approval of a "B-I"District would disrupt the quiet, non-obtrusive nature of the existing businesses in this area. A "B-I" District permitted uses would increase the traffic that could impact the existing school and community center across Everhart Road to the west The applicant has considered the option of a Special Permit for retail sales and the parking lot. The drawback on the Special Permit is that the applicant will continue to be restricted by the "AB" District sign regulations. In the "AB" District, the property may contain only one wall sign with an area not to exceed twenty(20) square feet and each business may have a one square foot identification wall sign. Mr. Saldafia informed the Commission that the Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "B-1" District due to its direct access to an arterial without traversing a residential area. However, the Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with professional office uses. The requested "B-I" District not consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. Therefore, Staff recommends denial of the rezoning request. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Dionicio Garza,Jr.,owner of Anthony's Salon,said that he sells one product which is the Aveeda Concept retail line. Mr.Garza added that he has signs on his building advertising the product and his business would suffer financially if he were not able to advertise the product. He addressed the additional parking lot behind his salon. Mr. Garza said that he did not have adequate parking and opted to lease property from nearby businesses for his employees. Due to his employees expressing danger of crossing Everhart Road,he opted to purchase the residential property abutting his salon to develop a parking area. He admitted that he did not have knowledge of being required to permit the construction and asked that the Commission allow him to have the parking lot which is developed at the rear of the residence fronting Sam Street. In response to Chairman Berlanga, Mr. Saldafia said that Mr. Garza requested a change of zoning after he received a notice of violation for signage and expanding his parking lot Mr. Garza responded to Commission's questions by saying that the residential property is currently being rented to his son and has been developed with a parking lot for approximately one(1)month. He added that he has owned the business for seven(7)years. Public hearing was closed. Responding to Vice Chairman Mims,Mr.Saldafia explained that if the rezoning request were approved,the applicant would be required to erect a standard screening fence along the north boundary line of Lot I. He added that depending on the parking spaces,Mr.Garza would be required to comply with the landscaping ordinance. The current signage would comply with the current zoning code which allows a "B-I" District to have unlimited wall signage. Mr.Saldafia said that staff believes that Sam Street should be maintained as a residential area. He outlined language that would be required if the Commission approved a special permit for parking lot located on the residential lot: "R-1B"with a Special Permit for parking and the number of spaces, screening fence along the north side and landscaping along the frontage. ' Planning Commission Minutes • August 29,2001 Page 7 Mr. Gunning said that allowing the parking on the residential property would be an encroachment into the neighborhood. He added that if the Special Permit were approved for a limited number of parking spaces and Mr. Garza's business continues to grow,he would not be allowed to exceed the number of parking spaces and would be required to move to another location. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Zamora, to forward a recommendation to City Council for approval of a "B-1" Neighborhood Business District on Lots 14B and 15 and denial on Lot 1. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. Robin Leary,Trustee: 0801-11 REQUEST: "F-R"Farm-Rural District and"R-1B"One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District on Northwest Estates, being 3.31 acres out of Lot 1,Block 9, all of Lot 1, Block 10, and all of Lot I, Block 11, located on the north side of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624), between Trinity River and Riverwood Drives. Mr. Saldafia presented a computerized slide presentation of the subject property and the surrounding area. He said that a portion of the subject property is in the "F-R" District area that contains 683.64 acres and is predominantly used as farmland. The north portion of the subject property is part of the "R-1B" District that contains 1,049.81 acres and predominantly developed with single-family residences. There are several tracts of land zoned a"B-4"District with a 1.06-acre vacant tract to the west; an 8.30-acre tract south of the subject property that contains a hair salon, a restaurant and a palm tree farm;a 1.22-acre tract east of the subject property that contains an animal clinic; and a 19.01-acre tract southeast of the subject property that contains a landscape nursery and an athletic club. There is an"AB"District east of the subject that contains 2.46 acres and developed with a church. Mr. Saidaiia said that the applicant has requested a change of zoning from an "F-R" Farm-Rural District and an"R-IB" One-family Dwelling District to a"B-4" General Business District in order to sell the properties as commercial land. The subject property comprises of three (3) blocks: Block 9 contains 3.31 acres, Block 10 contains 3.95 acres, and Block I1 contains 4.34 acres. Block 9 is located along the north side of Northwest Boulevard,an arterial,and along the west side of Pinnacle Drive,a local street. Block 10 is located on the north side of Northwest Boulevard and extends from Pinnacle Drive east to River Hill Drive,both local streets. Block 11 is a triangular-shape property with frontage along Northwest Boulevard and River Hill Drive. Block 9 is bordered by Northwest Boulevard to the south,Pinnacle Drive to the east,an undeveloped"F-R" District to the west and an "R-IB" District developed with single-family residences to the north. Development of Block 9 with "B-4" District uses would be consistent with the adopted Northwest Area Development Plan. However, some protection should be provided for the existing single-family residences. A "B-IA"Neighborhood Business District would allow a developer the flexibility for commercial development while providing the residences some protection by requiring a 6-foot tall masonry wall along the common lot line and a 15-foot wide landscape strip with trees. The "B-IA" District would serve as a buffer between the "B-4" District fronting Northwest Boulevard and the single-family residences to the north. Since Block 9 has a 30-foot platted setback from the residential properties,this setback area would be the"B-IA"District. Block 10 is bordered by Northwest Boulevard on the south,Pinnacle Drive on the west,River Hill Drive on the east and an"R-IB"District developed with single-family residences to the north. Development of Block 9 with "B-4" District uses would be consistent with the adopted Northwest Area Development Plan. However, some protection should be provided for the existing single-family residences. A'B-IA"Neighborhood Business District would allow a developer the flexibility for commercial development while providing the residences some protection by requiring a 6-foot tall masonry wall along the common lot line and a 15-foot wide landscape strip with trees. The "B-IA"District would serve as a buffer between the "B-4" District fronting Northwest Boulevard and the single- family residences to the north. Since Block 10 has a 30-foot platted setback from the residential properties, this setback area would be the"B-1A"District. Block I1 is a triangular shaped property that is bound by Northwest Highway on the south, River Hill Drive on the northwest, and private property on the east. The private property is zoned a'B-4"District,developed with a veterinary clinic,and an"R-1B"District,vacant land. Allowing the requested"B-4"District to extend deep into the residential area would introduce commercial traffic into the residential area. Staff is of the opinion that the frontage along Northwest Boulevard would be appropriate for "B-4" District uses, but not to extend into the W Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 Page 8 residential area. An "AB" Professional Office District would provide an adequate transition between the general commercial uses to the south and the residential uses to the north. The"AB"District is the non-residential district more compatible with residential uses. Staff recommends that no more than the south 230 feet of Block I1 be allowed for a"B-4"District with the remainder zoned an"AB"District. The Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested"B-4"District due to its direct access to an arterial. The Northwest Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with general commercial uses. The requested "B-4" District is consistent with the Plan's recommended land use map. However, some protection to the existing residential area should be provided. Therefore Staff recommends approval of the"B-4"District except denial of the"B-4"District on the north thirty(30) feet abutting the residential district, and in lieu thereof, approval of a"B-IA"Neighborhood Business District on Blocks 9 and 10; and approval of the "B-4"District on the south 230 feet and denial of the"B-4"District on the remaining area, and in lieu thereof,approval of an"AB"Professional Office District on Block 11. In response to Chairman Berlanga, Mr. Saldafia said that the applicant did not have an objection to the 30 feet of Blocks 9 and 10,which abut the residential neighborhood being zoned"B-1A"District;however, she had an objection to the"AB"District for the remainder of Block 11. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Clark Flato,representing the owner,provided a brief history of the property. He said that the property was platted in 1986 and that the lots fronting FM 624 (Northwest Boulevard) were designated as commercial lots. Mr.Flato continued that FM 624 is a major arterial and that uses appropriate for the area are general commercial uses. He said that the property would provide convenience and shopping for the neighborhood. Since the area is not rural anymore,FM 624 carries more traffic than US Highway 77. Extensive growth and development of residential neighborhoods have caused the increase in traffic. Mr. Flato said that the requested zoning was identified in the Northwest Area Master Plan. Commissioner Amsler said that he was not in favor of rezoning a piece of property prior to having information regarding what type of business would be developed. Vice Chairman Mims said that access to the portion of the property being rezoned to"AB"District would be limited to River Hill Drive. She suggested that the residents discuss their FM 624 traffic concerns with TXDOT. In response to Commissioner Pusley's question, Mr. Saldaua said that a "B-4" General Business District requires that the property have a screening fence when abutting a residential neighborhood. Commissioner Pusley said that he was concerned with a"BA"District abutting residential property. In response to Chairman Berlanga's questions, Mr. Saldafia said that an "B-1" Neighborhood Business District would require a standard six-foot screening fence, but is not required to have a 15 foot landscaped buffer. He added that a restaurant could be developed and parking would be allowed to the building line. Adeline Phillips, 14502 Spaulding,submitted five(5)letters and a petition with 86 signatures in opposition to the rezoning request. Ms.Phillips said that the neighborhood had a meeting regarding the rezoning and that there was a consensus that the property should be rezoned to either an office district or left as a residential district. She outlined concerns: 1)Traffic will be increased on FM 624 and River Hills Drive; 2)Noise; 3)Lighting either from businesses and business that have deliveries; 4) Inferior clientele; 5) Uses associated with the "B-4" General Business District such as used car lots,dumpsters,litter and other uses;and 6)Hours of operation. In response to Commissioner Pusley, Ms. Phillips said that the neighborhood discussed a 'B-1A" Neighborhood Business District shopping center and office uses. The triangle portion of the subject property is a concern of the residents. Kyle Marosich, 14530 Spaulding,expressed concerns similar to Ms.Phillips'regarding traffic on FM 624. He asked that the rezoning request not be granted. Marvin Leary, applicant, said that it was critical to the estate to be able to sell the property for the highest and best price. Mr. Leary said that when the Northwest Business plan was established, the subject property was b+ -Planning Commission Minutes • August 29,2001 Page 9 intended for business development. He added that FM 624 will continue to grow and traffic will not change based on the development of the property. He said that he was not opposed to the 30-foot buffer zone and added that stoma drains are in the area. Mr. Leary said that he would accept an"AB" District on the triangle-shaped property on Block 11 . He said that he believes that the neighbors will see a valuable asset in the area. In response to Commissioner Zamora, Mr. Flato said that the applicant proposes to sell the property in tracts and not divide the property into smaller lots to attract purchasers who want to develop quality projects. He continued that the Master Transportation Plan approved in 1987 names FM 624 as a primary arterial and added that FM 624 will be expanded to FM 666. Mr. Flato reiterated his previous statement regarding the Northwest Master Plan identifying the subject property appropriate for general commercial uses. Shear said that the property will be developing into commercial. Better uses would be "B-I" District or "AB"District. He said that drainage is a concern in the area and added that asphalt will create more of a drainage problem. John Martin Moorehead, said that an"AB" District would meet the needs of the area and provide better uses and be less detrimental. Public hearing was closed. Commissioner Amsler said that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the plan and agreed that traffic was a problem. He said that eventually residential districts would be on both sides of FM 64. Motion by Mims, seconded by Salazar, to forward a recommendation to City Council for recommends approval of the"B-4"District except denial of the"B-4"District on the north thirty(30)feet abutting the residential district, and in lieu thereof,approval of a"B-IA"Neighborhood Business District on Blocks 9 and 10; and approval of the"B-4"District on the south 230 feet and denial of the"B-4"District on the remaining area,and in lieu thereof, approval of an"AB" Professional Office District on Block 11. Motion passed with Pusley voting "Nay"; Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. George S.Hawn and Alan F.Lucke,Trustees: 0801-12 REQUEST: "R-1B"One-family Dwelling District to"F-R"Farm-Rural District on property described as Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 52, Lots 31, 32, and 33, located on the east side of Waldron Road,approximately 1,250 feet south of Yorktown Boulevard. Mr. Saldana presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of the "R-1B" District area that contains over 9,400 acres with the immediate area remaining undeveloped and the majority of the area to the north developed with single-family residential. Adjacent to the south are 2,145 acres of land zoned an"I-3"District and developed with a power plant. Adjacent to the north, east and west, there area 362 acres of land zoned an"F-R" District the contains some residential uses,but mostly remains as open pasture. The applicant has requested a change of zoning from an"R-1B"One-family Dwelling District to an"F-R" Farm-Rural District in order to have horses graze on the subject property. The existing"R-1B"District permits the keeping of horses provided a single-family residence exists on the property. The applicant does not intend to live on the property at the present time. Therefore,under the current"R-1B"District, the horses could not be kept on the subject property. The requested "F-R" District is consistent with the surrounding area that is zoned an "F-R" District and animals are being kept. The requested "F-R" District would be an expansion of the "F-R" District adjacent to the north,east and west. Approval of the "F-R"District would reduce the potential traffic that would be traversing Waldron Road,a collector road built to rural standards. Mr. Salda0a said that the subject property is within the Flour Bluff Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map that recommends the area to develop with low-density residential uses. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. it - Planning Commission Minutes • August 29,2001 Page 10 Motion by Mims, seconded Pusley, to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Pusley, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn. Motion passed with Richter and Sween-McGloin being absent. Meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Michael N.Gunning,AICP Lucinda P.Beal Director of Planning Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes August 29,2001 1. Commission tabled Case No.0801-05,Murray Bass,Jr.,request for"B-4"General Business District to the September 12,2001 meeting. This property is described as Bent Tree Unit 2,Block 7,Lot 5,located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard,approximately 600 feet west of Cimarron Boulevard. 2. Commission forwarded a recommendation to City Council that Case No. 0801-10, Dionicio Garza, Jr. request for "B-I" District be approved on Lots 14B and 15 and denied on Lot 1. The property is described as Sunnyside Strip, Lots 14-B and 15 and Claremont Place,Block 1, Lot 1, located on the north side of Jacquelyn Drive,between Everhart Road and Sam Street. 3. Commission forwarded a recommendation to City Council that Case No.0801-11,Robin Leary,Trustee, request for"B-4"General Commercial District be approved on Lots 9 and 10 except the north 30 feet be approved for "B-1A" District, approval "B-4" District on the south 230 feet of block 10 and "AB" District on the remainder of the block. The property is described as on Northwest Estates, being 3.31 acres out of Lot 1, Block 9, all of Lot 1,Block 10,and all of Lot 1,Block II, located on the north side of Northwest Boulevard(F.M.624),between Trinity River and Riverwood Drives. 4. Commission forwarded a recommendation to City Council that Case No.0801-12, George S. Hawn and Alan Lucke,request for"F-R"Farm-Rural District be approved. This property is described as Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 52, Lots 31, 32, and 33, located on the east side of Waldron Road,approximately 1,250 feet south of Yorktown Boulevard.