Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 08/16/2000 t o • • • Planning Commission Minutes August 16,2000 Commissioners Present: David Berlanga,Chairman Shirley Mims,Vice Chairman Neill F.Amsler William J. Kelly Elizabeth Chu Richter Eloy H. Salazar Brooke Sween-McGloin Robert Zamora Commissioners Absent: W.David Cheek Staff Present: Miguel S. Saldaiia,AICP,City Planner Lucinda P.Beal,Recording Secretary Harry J.Power,City Planner Robert E.Payne,AICP,Senior Planner Mic Raasch,AICP,City Planner Doyle Curtis,Assistant City Attorney Leo Farias,P.E.,Special Services Engineer CALL TO ORDER Chairman Berlanga declared a quorum and called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. NON PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS Presentation-Award For Service-David Underbrink Chairman Berlanga read the resolution presented to Mr.David Underbrink into the record: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENDING David Underbrink for diligent and dedicated service to the City of Corpus Christi Planning Commission. WHEREAS, David Underbrink has completed three (3) consecutive years (1997 - 2000) of exemplary service on the Planning Commission: WHEREAS,during these three years, Mr. Underbrink • served one terms as Chairman, • served as a member and Vice Chairman of the Plat Ordinance Review Committee, • was instrumental in the adoption of the Telecommunications Tower Ordinance, • provided valuable input in the formulation of the proposed "B-IA" Neighborhood Business District, • played a vital role in the review and adoption of three(3)Capital Improvement Programs, SCANNED • Planning Commission Agenda August 16.2000 Page 2 • and three(3)Community Development Block Grant Awards. • voted on 244 re-zoning cases and • 383 platting cases. WHEREAS. during Mr. Underbrink's service, the City adopted various Area Development Plans and planned amendments covering all areas of the City and its extra territorial jurisdiction; WHEREAS, In service to the public, Mr. Underbrink gave unsparingly of his time and knowledge in the City's efforts to establish a comprehensive,consistent, fair and progressive planning capability; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Corpus Christi Planning Commission that Mr. David Underbrink has earned the appreciation and respect of the general public and his fellow Commission members. Commissioner Sween-McGloin thanked Mr.Underbrink for his willingness to serve the community and his time on the Commission which is very valuable. She thanked him for sharing his unique skills and talents and bringing his individual background and experiences forward to craft each case decision that ultimately impacts the overall fabric of our community. She and the Commission acknowledged that his time and service has brought positive changes to both the Planning Commission process and to the Commission's product that will serve our community and our children for years to come. Commissioner Sween-McGloin thanked Mr. Underbrink for his vision and for his even handed ability to look at all sides of the issues to facilitate decisions that benefit both the City and the applicants. Mr.Underbrink was presented with a token of the Commission's appreciation.He thanked the Commission and Staff for their valued efforts. Discussion Of Northwest Area Development Plan Draft Mr. Robert Payne, Senior Planner of Comprehensive Planning, introduced Mr. Mic Raasch, City Planner, and presented information to the Commission for discussion regarding an Update of Northwest Area Development and Planning Process. The Northwest Area Development Plan was adopted in 1988. Planning Staff is recommending that the plan be expanded to include the area within the Bluntzer Area Development Plan and the portion of Port/Airport Violate Area Development west of Rand Morgan Road and north of State Highway 44. This consolidation of ADP areas will provide a more efficient and unified plan for the Northwest area. Mr. Payne stated that the update focuses on transportation and future land use issues. The growing traffic congestion in the Northwest area is well known and the primary purpose is to provide a guide for capital improvements that will relieve the congestion problem. Future land use must also be addressed since the transportation network is a function of the land uses that it will serve. However, the planning process will provide an opportunity for other issues of concern to be brought up by service departments,city boards and commission,and the public. For this reason, the plan format includes some policy recommendations on all of the topical areas customarily covered by an Area Development Plan. Mr. Payne outlined the proposed planning process. 1) Discuss the draft plan with the Planning Commission and set a public hearing date; 2) Public hearing on August 28, 2000 with the Transportation Advisory Committee; 3) Planning Commission conducts at least one public hearing, revises the draft, and recommends the plan for City Council adoption; 4) Planning Commission and Staff submit the plan to the City Manager for consideration, including at least one public hearing as required by City Charter, and adoption on second reading by City Council. Mr.Payne highlighted the environment section of the report by stating that the policy statement encourages preservation of the expansive open space within the Nueces River floodplain. With regard to the land use portion of the plan,the plan statement states that areas designated Conservation/Preservation are to be conserved and protected. This designation applies only to existing floodways along the Nueces River. This land use designation includes a .t es;, n %' . • Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 3 continuation of existing agricultural uses, natural preserves, and several large sand and gravel excavation operations within the Nueces River floodplain. Areas designated for Agricultural and Rural uses are intended to encourage continuation of farming, ranching, and residential activities in a rural setting. These activities should be consistent with the City's desire to protect water quality in the region's water supply watershed and create minimal demand for urban public services. New development is recommended at a density of one(1) residential unit per five(5)acres in the water supply watershed. Areas outside the water supply watershed area are recommended for one (1) unit per five acres to one (1) unit per acre until public services levels can support higher density residential development. Mr.Payne stated that the future land use and transportation are the main focus of the plan for ultimate development. The future land use map illustrates large areas to the west with residential development. In outlying rural areas, commercial development of a small scale for convenience shopping needs is necessary and desirable to serve the outlying portions of the Plan area. Mr. Payne stated that currently there is strip commercial along Northwest Boulevard which creates many conflicts with traffic issues. The expansion of commercial uses along Northwest Boulevard(F.M. 624)should be controlled and/or minimized to protect the traffic carrying capacity of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624). He continued that the Industrial District#2 is not subject to zoning or building codes. With regard to Transportation, Mr. Payne stated that the plan recommends Northwest Boulevard (F.M.624) as an arterial with an ultimate 120-foot minimum right-of-way, six lanes, and a median. Median cuts should maintain a spacing of not less than 600 feet or the State's standards, whichever is greater. This type of roadway will increase the carrying capacity of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) at its approach to 5 Points by 35 percent. The City will encourage TxDot and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to make these improvements one of their highest transportation improvement priorities. County Road 52 is recommended as an arterial with an ultimate 100 feet minimum right-of-way, 4 lanes and a landscaped median. County Road 52 is recommended to be improved between County Road 75 and the South Loop Expressway. Portions of County Road 52 east from the South Loop Expressway and west from County Road 75 are recommended as a collector with an ultimate 70 feet minimum right-of-way with four (4) lanes. County Road 52 will serve as a relief route for through traffic to avoid Northwest Boulevard(F.M. 624)congestion west of 5 Points. County Road 75 extension will serve as the connection between Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and County Road 52 and provide east bound traffic an easy connection to County Road 52. Commissioner Kelly expressed concerns with a plat with a 70-foot right-of-way that was approved by the Commission. Mr. Payne stated that after speaking with David Seiler it was decided that the 70-foot roadway would be sufficient for the area. Commissioner Mims questioned whether TxDot or Nueces County would participate in road construction for County 52. Mr. Payne replied that Nueces County stated that they would build a portion of the road. However, there are right-of-way issues. The State has planned to build an overpass on County Road 52, but have not committed to building County Road 52. Mr. Payne requested a direction regarding the public hearing process. He stated that the Planning Commission could hold a public hearing or Staff could schedule meetings with the Northwest Planning Group and other concerns citizens who could provide input. Staff could request information from TxDot regarding plans for County Road 52. The Commission stated that they preferred to receive information from TxDot and Nueces County and to have Staff meet with the residents in the Northwest area. Future Scheduled Meetings Chairman Berlanga asked the Commission to review the schedule provided in the Commission packet. Mr.Saldana stated that if the December 20, 2000 or the January 3, 2001 meetings were going to be cancelled, Staff needed to be notified as soon as possible to be able to prepare for the rescheduling process. r Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 4 Other Matters Chairman Berlanga requested Staff to place a discussion item on the agenda for the next meeting regarding implementation of a 3-minute rule. Mr.Saldana stated that he would place the item on the agenda for discussion. Chairman Berlanga stated that he preferred to initiate a 3-minute limit on people wishing to speak on behalf of a case presented to the Commission. He continued that a 3-minute rule would eliminate repetitiveness and keep the meetings on track. The Commission concurred. After a discussion with Legal,the Commission decided to place a discussion item on the agenda for August 30,2000 to address the 3-minute request. Planning Project and Priorities Mr. Saldana informed the Commission that Mr. Gunning is scheduled to meeting with the Skip Noe, • Deputy City Manager, to discuss project priorities. After Mr. Gunning meetings with the Deputy City Manager,he will provide a list of project priorities to the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS PLATS Continued Plats a. 070093-NP50 Wade Tract Block 5,Lots B1 &B2(O.C.L.)(Final 2.18 Acres) Located west of County Road 73A between F.M.624 and County Road 50 Mr.Power stated that Staff recommends approval as submitted. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Mims, to approve Staff's recommendation. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. b. 080097-NP54 Lantana Industrial Area,Block 2, Lot IA(Final Replat—6.613 Acres) Located along the west side of Hereford Road,approximately 100 feet north of Agnes Street Mr. Power stated that the applicant's engineer requested a two-week continuance. Staff recommends a continuance. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Mims, seconded by Zamora, to contine the plat for two weeks. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. S • Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 5 New Plats a. 080099-P45 Smeller Tract, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2(Preliminary—8.728 Acres) Located along the south side of Purdue Road,approximately 90 feet west of Windmere Drive b. 080098-P44 Smeller Tract.Block 1,Lot 1 (Final—0.99 Acre) Located along the south side of Purdue Road,approximately 90 feet west of Windmere Drive Mr.Power stated that plats a and b are from the same development and that Staff recommends approval. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Kelly, to approve Staffs recommendation. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. c. 0800101-NP55 Paul Court Addition,Block 6, Lot 3A(Final Replat—0.283 Acre) Located south of Comanche Street and west of Coke Street Mr.Power stated that Staff recommends approval as submitted. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Mr. Power provided the Commission with background information regarding the plat. He said that the subject property is a portion of two separate subdivisions. Paul Court subdivision was platted in 1908 and the Leigh Tract is an unrecorded subdivision developed in 1966. The owner plans to combine the two lots into one for the residence that is currently on the property. Mr. Power stated that there was a requirement for a street dedication that was never required of the property previously. Motion by Mims, seconded by Sween-McGloin, to approve Staffs recommendation. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. Time Extensions Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Kelly, to group Time Extensions a though d. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. a. 089975-P33 The Lakes Unit 9B(Final—3.97 Acres) Located west of Lake Micala Drive at the west extension of Lake Superior Drive b. 020016-P8 King's Crossing Unit 13 (Final— 10.056 Acres) Located south of Yorktown Boulevard east of South Staples Street(F.M.2444) Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 6 c. 020022-NP 11 Cormar Industrial Tract,Lot 7(Final—6.59 Acres) Located west of Bush Avenue(C.R.35)south of South Padre Island Drive(S.H.358) d. 020026-NP 12 Kinnett Addition.Block 1,Lots 1 &2(Final—2.499 Acres) Located between Laguna Shores Road and the Laguna Madre south of Hustlin' Hornet Mr. Power stated that Staff recommends approval of a six-month time extension for each plat. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Kelly, seconded by Sween-McGloin, to approve a six-month time extension for plats a through d. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. ZONING CASES New Zoning Cases Slim's Auto Sales&Slim's Pickens: 0800-04 REQUEST: "I-2" Light Industrial District to "I-3" Heavy Industrial District on RA-Rose Industrial Site, Block 3, Lot I and located on the southwest corner of Agnes Street and South Navigation Boulevard Mr. Saldana presented a slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of 904.18 acres of land that is zoned an"I-2" District and is partially developed with various types of industrial uses and retail establishments. To the north, there are 503.63 acres of land zoned an"I-3"District that are developed with various types of warehouses,distribution centers and metal salvage yards. Mr. Saldana continued that in June 2000,a notice of violation was sent to the property owner and applicant advising them that a change in use required a Certificate of Occupancy and that an auto salvage yard was not permitted in the existing "I-2" District. In July 2000, another notice was sent stating that the aforementioned violations had not been corrected. The applicant requested a change of zoning to an "I-3" Heavy Industrial District in order to continue operating an auto salvage yard. A used auto parts sales building and an auto sales lot currently are being operated by the applicant. The "I-3" District requires that an auto salvage yard be screened for view through the use of a screening fence,shrubbery,or other similar substitute. A screening fence currently exists between the salvage yard and Agnes Street. Screening along South Navigation Boulevard will be required if the zoning is approved. Mr.Saldana stated that the applicant would need to provide 16 parking spaces for auto sales and two (2) parking spaces for the employees. The subject property is within the Westside Area Development Plan that recommends the area to develop with light industrial uses. The requested"I-3"District would be an extension of the "I-3"District to the north and would not adversely impact the adjacent properties. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. There were ten (10) notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property of which none were returned in favor or opposition. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. • • Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 7 Raymond Dalt, New Braunfels, stated that he is co-owner of the subject property. 2.5 acres of the subject property is currently fenced. He continued that he was in agreement with the fencing requirement and the parking space requirement. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Kelly, to approve an"I-3" District. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. Al Landry,Jr.: 0800-05 REQUEST: "AB" Professional Office District to "B-4" General Business District on Ocean View Addition, Park Block, Lots 17 and 18 and located on the northwest corner of Elizabeth Street and Santa Fe Street Mr. Saldana presented a slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of 82.19 acres of land zoned an "AB" District and developed with a mixture of single-family and multiple-family residences and offices. There are other pockets of property zoned an "AB" District. North of the subject property, there is a tract of land, 0.34 acre, developed with apartments. To the south, there are 1.31 acres developed with medical offices. Adjacent to the south and east of the subject property, there are 27.87 acres of land zoned a "B-4" District and predominantly developed with hospital and medical related uses. There are three (3) tracts of land zoned a "B-1" District, 2.15 acres to the north that is developed with a parking lot, 0.21 acre to the southwest containing an office,and 1.86 acres to the south containing a parking lot,an office and a restaurant. Mr. Saldana said that the applicant requested change of zoning to convert the existing medical office into a pharmacy. The proposed pharmacy is not intended to be the typical pharmacy in that they will conduct business directly with the surrounding medical facilities. There will be no walk-in traffic. A pharmacy is classified as a retail establishment and therefore, requires a business district. The requested "B-4" District is an expansion of the adjacent "B-4" District to the south and east. However, the proposed pharmacy does not require that intense of a zoning district. A`B-1"Neighborhood Business District would allow the pharmacy. The"B-1"District would also act as a transition between the high intense"B-4"District and the low-intense"AB"District. The subject property is within the Southeast Area Development Plan which recommends the area to develop with professional office uses. The requested"B-4" District is not consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. However, a`B-1"District that acts as a transition between the"B-4"District and"AB"District would be consistent with the Plan's policy statement. Therefore,denial of the"B-4"District, and in lieu thereof,approval of a "B-1" Neighborhood Business District. There were ten (10) notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property of which four (4) were returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. A letter in favor was received from the subject property owner. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Jim Bowler, 5922 Parkland, distributed a map depicting surrounding properties zoned"B-4"District. Mr. Bowler said that the applicant's, Mr. Landry, business is proposed to delivery pharmaceuticals to their clients and will not have walk-in customers. Their clients are hospitals and doctors' offices. Mr. Bowler requested the `B-4" District to conform to the neighborhood. He continued that Mr. Landry is leasing the property and if Mr. Landry decides to move his business to another location, a"B-4"District zoning would benefit the property owner when he attempts to sell the property. In response to Commissioner Salazar's question regarding advantages to "B-4" District zoning, Mr. Bowler reiterated the advantages for selling the property and added that the increase in signage allowance was another factor. Public hearing was closed. In response to Commission's question regarding the "B-1" District, Mr. Saldana stated that the applicant could develop the pharmacy in a'B-1"District. • ,,%/1 a , Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 8 Motion by Mims, seconded by Sween-McGloin, to approve Staffs recommendation for "B-1" District zoning. Motion passed unanimously with Cheek being absent. Taft Investment Trust: 0800-06 REQUEST: "A-1"Apartment House District to "B-3" Business District on South Park Subdivision, Block 2, Lot 44 and located on the northwest corner of South Padre Island Drive and Kasper Street Mr. Saldana presented a slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of an area containing of approximately 5.26 acres of land zoned an "A-1" District and developed with single family residences. To the east, there is a 0.71-acre tract of land zoned a "B-1" District with a Special Permit and developed with an auto sales use. Further east, there is a 0.69 acre tract of land zoned an"AB"District with a Special Permit and developed with a hair salon with retail sales. Adjacent to the north of the"A-1"District, there is a large area extending north of McArdle Road and containing 2,126.98 acres of land zoned an "R-1B" District that has been developed with single-family residences. The "B-4" District located to the south and west, extends along South Padre Island Drive,contains 88.33 acres and is developed with auto sales lots,offices and retail stores. Mr. Saldana stated that the applicant requested a change of zoning to convert the residential lot into a used car sales lot. There is an 832 square foot residential structure and a 200 square foot garage building that the applicant proposes to remodel into an office and storage area. The subject property is located at the intersection of a local street, Kasper Street, nonresidential traffic may traverse the residential neighborhood, which is contrary to adopted City policies. A "B-3" District is not appropriate at this time due to its adjacency to existing residential uses. Although the Southeast Area Development Plan recommends the area to develop with general commercial uses,its policies state that the transition should be a gradual transition. The"B-3"District permits uses that are not appropriate when adjacent to residential uses. However,with direct access to an expressway frontage road, an auto sales use may be appropriate, especially since an auto sales lot is currently operating across Kasper Street from the subject property. The auto sale use may be permitted under a Special Permit to ensure no access to Kasper Street and to limit the number of vehicles sold on the subject property. Staff has realized that a typical single-family lot may not be adequate to accommodate an unrestricted auto sales lot. The auto sales lot to the east packs the vehicles in without providing off-street customer parking and has received a notice of violation for the lack of off-street parking. Therefore,Staff is of the opinion that the subject property could accommodate twelve(12)vehicles for sale and the required off-street parking of three(3)parking spaces. The subject property is within the Southeast Area Development Plan which recommends the area to develop with general commercial uses. However, other policies state that the transition from residential to nonresidential should be a gradual transition. Therefore, Staff recommends denial of the "B-3" District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a`B-1"Neighborhood Business District with a Special Permit for an auto sales use subject to the following conditions: 1) Use. The only use authorized by this Special Permit other than the basic `B-1" Neighborhood Business District permitted uses is an auto sales lot. No on-site repair work of any type may be performed. 2) Auto Sales. The auto sales use is limited to no more than twelve(12)vehicles for sale at one time. 3) Lighting~ All exterior lighting must be directional and shielded. Lighting must be directed away from the surrounding residences and public rights-of-way. 4) Speakers. Outside paging,speakers,telephone bells,or similar devices are prohibited. 5) Access. Vehicle access or drive approach to Kasper Street are prohibited. The existing drive approach on Kasper Street must be removed and replaced with full curb and gutter before a certificate of occupancy is issued. 6) Screening. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet must be located along the north and west property lines. However,within ten(10) feet of the Kasper Street right- of-way line, the screening fence must have a height of three (3) feet. A length not to exceed five (5) feet and ten (10) feet from the Kasper Street right-of-way line may be used to transition the • 410 Planning Commission Agenda August 16,2000 Page 9 fence from a height of six(6) feet to three(3)feet. The fence must be installed before a certificate of occupancy is issued. 7) Time Limit. Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one(1)year of the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. There were 24 notices were mailed to subject property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property of which one(1)was returned in favor and two(2)were returned in opposition. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Mike Kasper, representing Taft Investment Trust, stated that he agreed with the information provided with respect to the lot across the street from the subject property. However, Mr. Kasper requested that the applicant not be penalized for the action of another business in the area. He plans to lease the property and will require the lessee to abide by the Special Permit as recommended by Staff. Mr. Kasper submitted a site plan illustrating 13 parking spaces for vehicles to be sold and three (3) additional parking spaces for employees and customers. Access to the business will be via South Padre Island Drive and access to the residential,Kasper Street,will be eliminated. Edmund Garza,5037 Kasper,expressed concern with the traffic volume that will result from another car lot on the corner of Kasper Street and South Padre Island Drive. Mr. Garza said that there are children in the area due to the adjacency of an elementary school and believes the danger level will increase. He said that people view the vehicles for sale as they drive along Kasper Street. He explained that patrons of the existing car lot park their vehicles in front of his home while they negotiate the price of a vehicle due to the fact that the owner of the car lot has not provided adequate space for customers to park on the property. Mr. Garza stated that vehicles accessing Kasper Street via South Padre Island Drive cannot view vehicles going north on Kasper Street which is another dangerous issue. He requested that a no parking sign be erected to eliminate on-street parking. With regard to the subject property, Mr. Garza stated that he does not believe the subject property is large enough to accommodate 13 vehicles for sale and three (3) additional spaces. Mr. Garza added that the owner of the property across from the subject property hired a towing company to remove vehicles at night,which is disruptive to the neighborhood. Elsa Garza, 5037 Kasper,stated that patrons park along South Padre Island Drive to patronize the business. She stated that the view is block of oncoming traffic on South Padre Island Drive which makes it dangerous to exit from Kasper Street. Mr.Kaspar agreed with the neighbors and stated that he and his client would abide with any conditions that will be implemented in the Special Permit. Cynthia Franco, 5038 Kasper, stated that she has received notices of zoning violations due to the car lot across from the subject property parking vehicles on the grass front of her home and requested information to remedy the situation. Public hearing was closed. Notation was made to include condition#8 as Landscaping requirement. Commission expressed concerns regarding patrons of the existing car lot parking in front of the residents homes and offered suggestions to remedy the situation. The Police Department could issue citations for vehicles parked on the public right-of-way or placement of no parking signs could be placed in front of the residents homes. There was also concern with adequate parking for the proposed car lot on the subject property and the impact it will have on the residents of the adjacent neighborhood. In response to Vice Chairman Mims' question regarding "B-1" District uses, Mr. Saldaiia listed some allowable uses as being a convenience store, fueling station, video rental business, or a restaurant with or without alcoholic beverages. Mr. Saldaiia continued that a `B-1" District allows a larger sign as compared to an "A-1" 110 woo 'lanning Commission Agenda august 16,2000 . age 10 .)istrict which allows a 40-square foot sign. The"AB"District is more restrictive. A "B-1A" District would allow 0 square foot sign and/or a wall sign on the building. Motion by Amsler, seconded by Mims, to approve a"B-1"Neighborhood Business District with a Special ?ermit subject to eight(8)conditions and amending condition#2 to allow 13 cars. Motion passed unanimously with Amsler, Berlanga, Kelly, Mims, and Richter voting "Aye"; Salazar, Sween-McGloin, and Zamora voting "Nay"; and Cheek being absent. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Mims,seconded by Salazar,to adjourn the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 7:58 p.m. /,_ (7%( :4Ad/) ` \licha N.Gunning, d91P/Pri a:-P ei a i .., AICP Lucinda P. Beal Director of Planning Recording Secretary