Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 04/19/1995 Q MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL APRIL 19, 1995 - 6:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lamont Taylor, Chairman * Robert Canales,Vice Chairman Michael Bertuzzi Laurie Cook Ralph Hall Alma Meinrath Danny Noyola Sylvia Perez Richard Sema STAFF PRESENT: W. Thomas Utter, Group Manager, Development Services Brandol M. Harvey,AIA,AICP, Director,Planning and Development Marcia Cooper, Recording Secretary Michael Gunning, Sr. Planner Norbert Hart,Assistant City Attorney John Mulvenna,Administrator for Community Development Jo Ann Dominguez, Admin. Asst. Sandee Galvan, Recording Secretary CAI I. TO ORDER Chairman Taylor called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and described the procedure to be followed. PUBLIC HRARINQ * Vice Chairman Canales arrived at 8:20 p.m. SCANNED Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 2 NEW ZONINGS Victoria Bank& Trust. Trustee: 495-3 REQUEST: From "RIB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District on Tract 1, and "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District on Tract 2, being part of Lots 3 and 4, Section 18, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts,located between South Padre Island Drive and McArdle Road and between Daly and Aswan Drives. Mr. Gunning stated that the applicant is requesting a change of zoning from"R-1B"One- family Dwelling District and "B-1" Neighborhood Business District to "B-4" General Business District on Tract 1, and from `R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District on Tract 2. The subject property extends from South Padre Island Drive to McArdle Road and remains undeveloped. Tract 1, approximately 24.3 acres, is located along the South Padre Island Drive frontage,and extends approximately 800 feet into the property. Tract 2,approximately 10 acres, is located along the McArdle Road frontage, and extends approximately 330 feet into the property. To the east,the area is developed with single-family residences. The area adjacent to the west remains undeveloped. Tract 1 has direct access to South Padre Island Drive,a major thoroughfare. This tract would most likely be developed with a retail center which is consistent with development along South Padre Island Drive. Due to the depth of the proposed"B-4",there could be some adverse impact on the adjoining residences to the east because of the 13-4" permitted uses such as auto dealerships, auto repair garages,dance halls and bars, lounges,or taverns. However, commercial development along South Padre Island Drive is typical and consistent with adopted City policies. Tract 2 has direct access to McArdle Road,a collector,with convenient access to arterials, Airline Road to the west and Nile Road to the east. Both arterials have direct access to South Padre Island Drive. The allowable residential density in the requested "R-2" is 14.52 units per acre as compared to 7.26 units per acre allowed in the current and surrounding"R-1B"districts. Although the applicant does not have a specific development plan, they are considering a series of duplexes and triplexes,and possibly a senior citizens complex of triplexes and fourplexes for either owner or rental occupied. . The primary concern with the proposed zoning is the adjacency of the"B-4"to the developed single-family subdivision,Meadow Lane,to the east. The applicant has indicated a desire to modify the "R-2" zoning portion of their request based on neighborhood opposition to multi-family uses. Basically,they intend to withdraw the request for"R-2" on Tract 2 and retain the current"R-1B" District for future single-family uses. Furthermore,in order to provide a buffer to the requested it V Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 3 "B-4", they propose to retain a strip of"R-1B" zoning along the east property line beginning at a point 100 feet south of Southhaven Drive and extending north to McArdle Road. The strip would be approximately 520 feet by 150 feet,which is sufficient width to accommodate a future extension of Southhaven Drive to connect with McArdle Road and provide for residential lots fronting the street extension on the east side and only where "B-4" is requested across the street. Commercial access on Southhaven would not be permitted. Where the proposed"B-4" abuts the street extension, the applicant has agreed to install a screening fence and three (3)foot landscaped area. Under this development scenario, the street in combination with the screening fence and landscaping would create a buffer for the single-family homes from the`B-4" The applicant's discussions with local residents has generated the new concept of retaining single-family along McArdle. It should be noted that land use policies support the concept of transitioning from commercial zoning to multi-family, and then to single-family, as originally requested. Although this alternative may be more acceptable to the neighborhood, it should be noted that other than establishing the zoning boundaries,and requiring compliance with the screening and landscaping ordinances, the City does not have the authority to hold the applicant to this development plan once the zoning is approved. Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report(copy on file). Thirty seven notices were mailed,none were returned in favor and seven in opposition. Staff recommends denial of`R-2"Multiple Dwelling District on Tract 2, and approval of`B-4" General Business District on Tract 1, excluding a 150 foot by 520 foot portion out of the northeast corner. Commissioners Cook and Hall abstaining from discussion and voting on this zoning application. Mr. Tim Clower,415 Starr Street,appeared representing the applicant. He stated that they met with Staff and have been monitoring the concerns of the abutting neighborhoods, and have decided to let Tract 2 remain"R-1B"and let it develop into residential. He stated that they would add a strip of residential which will add another buffer, and create a street between the business zoned property and the Meadowlane subdivision,with landscaping,and no access to that street from the business property. Access to the business property will be from South Padre Island Drive only. They do not plan to have any streets entering from Tract 1 into Tract 2. Mr. Ralph Bennett, 6262 Weber, appeared in opposition, stating that he was in opposition to the request,but with the proposed modification,he will withdraw his opposition. *ow vel Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 4 Mr. Gary Pillinger, 6606 Carlon Drive, appeared and asked if a go-cart tract would be allowed if the requested zoning is granted. Mr. Gunning replied in the negative. In answer to another question,Mr. Gunning stated that`B-4" zoning permits bars,taverns, clubs, etc. but they cannot be located within 300 feet of a school. He added that landscaping and screening along the proposed extension of South Haven Drive are requirements of the zoning and landscaping regulations. The recommendation is based on zoning and the applicant's proposed plan. Mr. Harvey stated that the intent of the property owner regarding access between the residential and the commercial properties will be a function of planing. He felt that there are not many opportunities to vary from the proposed plan for the buffer street and additional single-family lots on the east side of the tract. Ms.Elaine Turner,6806 Aswan,appeared stating that she was opposed to the zoning request, but no longer opposes the application as modified. The public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Perez, seconded by Meinrath, that this application for"B-4" General Business District on Tract 1 and"R-2"Multiple Dwelling District on Tract 2 be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that"R-2" Multiple Dwelling District on Tract 2 be denied,and that"B-4" General Business District be approved on Tract 1,with the exception of a 50 foot by 520 foot portion out of the northeast corner. Motion passed with Bertuzzi,Meinrath,Noyola,Perez,Sema and Taylor voting aye, Cook and Hall abstaining, and Canales being absent. Charles V. Miller: 495-4 REQUEST: From "B-4" General Business District to "I-2" Light Industrial District on Westwood Shopping Center, south portion of Lot D, located on the north side of Leopard Street, approximately 640 feet west of War Path. Mr. Gunning stated that the applicant represents the Westwood Shopping Center and is requesting a change of zoning from"B-4"General Business District to"1-2"Light Industrial District in order to continue leasing the 1.3 acre site to the existing tree service business. The tree service stores large trucks and equipment outside, which requires industrial zoning. They also maintain a business office on site where employees report to work and then leave in the company trucks to different locations. No tree service activities are performed in the yard. V Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 5 The subject property fronts on Leopard Street on the west end of Westwood Shopping Center, adjacent to a 50 foot drainage easement. Dense vegetation along the easement effectively screens the subject property from the large lot single-family Rolling Acres Subdivision located 170 feet to the west. There is an existing large lot residence across Leopard Street to the south that sides up to Leopard Street and fronts Princess Drive. My adverse visual impact on these residences can be mitigated with landscaping screening. Approval of the requested"I-2" District on this property would be detrimental to the residences and the continued development of the area. The requested district permits uses such as the blending of insecticides, fungicides, and disinfectants; manufacturing of concrete products,etc.,which are not compatible with the surrounding properties. The tree service business could be accommodated in this area provided the storage is screened from view from the public right-of-way and adjacent properties. Since the storage is adjacent to the shopping center's parking lot, the storage area is visible to Leopard Street traffic. Screening along the east boundary of the subject property would provide screening from public view. There is an existing screening fence along the rear of the property and along a portion of the west boundary line which should remain. However, the screening fence along the west boundary line should be extended to and along the front of the property. The screening fence in the front yard should be set back five (5) feet from the property line to allow for a landscaped strip. The combination of screening and landscaping would permit the use to blend with the surrounding area. Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report(copy on file). Six notices were mailed, none were returned in favor and one in opposition. Staff recommends denial of"1-2" Light Industrial District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for the outside storage of vehicles and equipment related to a tree service business subject to the following conditions: I. Jag: The only use authorized by this Special Permit other than the basic "B-4" General Business District uses is the outside storage of vehicles and equipment related to a tree service business. The outside storage can not include the storage of insecticides or other similar chemicals. 2. SCREENING: A standard screening fence with a height of at least six(6) feet must be installed and maintained along the north, east and west boundary lines and along a line parallel to and set back five(5)feet from the front property line. The screening fence must be installed within one(1)year of the date of this ordinance. 3. J.ANDSCAPINCL: A landscaping strip with a width of at least five(5)feet must be located between the south screening fence line and the front property line,excluding the driveway area The landscape strip must contain Indian Hawthorn shrubs of at N Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 6 least five (5) gallons in size and spaced no more than five (5) feet on center, and Asiatic Jasmine ground cover. The landscaping must be maintained in a healthy, growing condition at all times. All landscaping must be installed within one(1)year of the date of this ordinance. 4. TIME LIMIT: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one(1) year of the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in condition#1 and in compliance with all other conditions. Neither the applicant nor a representative was present. Commissioner Noyola questioned the specific plants required for landscaping, and Mr. Harvey responded that it is difficult to up with performance standards that will guarantee the desired results. A specific plan is suggested which meets the intent. He added that the applicant is in agreement with the plant requirement. No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Sema,seconded by Noyola,that this application for"I-2"Light Industrial District be denied, and in lieu thereof that a Special Permit be granted in accordance with Staff's recommendation. Motion passed with Bertuzzi, Cook, Hall, Meinrath,Noyola, Perez, Sema and Taylor voting aye, with Canales being absent. T.P McCord& Sons: 495-5 REQUEST: From "A-2" Apartment House District to "B-4" General Business District on Dahlia Terrace Annex, Block 9, Lots 1 through 4, and Block 10, Lots 2 through 6, located on the south side of Baldwin Boulevard, approximately 120 feet west of Ayers Street. Mr.Gunning stated that the applicant is requesting a change of zoning from"A-2"Apartment House District to"B-4"General Business District in order to develop Block 9 with a parking lot,and Block 10 with possibly a mini-storage warehouse. The subject property, currently undeveloped, fronts an arterial, Baldwin Boulevard, and backs up to existing single-family residences. Other than Fig Street,there is no direct access to the residential area to the south. The property is also located between existing"B-4" zoned properties to the east and west. A"B-4" District on the subject property would be an expansion of the adjacent "B-4" Districts. The requested zoning is consistent with adopted City policies in that the property has direct access to an arterial and the traffic would not have to traverse low-density residential areas. The subject lots have a depth of 75 feet which limits the amount and type of commercial it r► Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 7 development that could occur. The property could be developed residentially under the existing"A- 2" zoning, however, residential uses fronting a busy arterial would not be desirable. It should be noted that any commercial development on the subject property would require a 10 foot setback from the residential area and a screening fence with a minimum height of six(6)feet. The setback and screening requirements reduces the potential adverse impact on the residences. Any development, except for single-family and duplex uses, would be required to comply with the City's landscape regulations, thereby improving the visual aesthetics along Baldwin Boulevard. Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report(copy on file). Forty five notices were mailed, none were returned in favor or in opposition. Staff recommends approval. Mr. David Water, 5413 Parliament, appeared representing the applicant. He stated that he would answer any questions. No one appeared in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Cook,seconded by Sema,that this application for`B-4"General Business District be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that it be approved. Motion passed with Bertuzzi, Cook, Hall, Meinrath,Noyola, Perez, Sema and Taylor voting aye, with Canales being absent. William Paul Sissamis: 495-6 REQUEST: From "R-I B" One-family Dwelling District to "AB" Professional Office District on Central Park Unit 1,Block 7,Lots 1 through 3 and Coggin Subdivision, Lots I through 5, located on the west side of Kirkwood Drive,between Gollihar Road and Mahan Drive. Mr. Gunning stated that the applicant is requesting a change of zoning from"R-1 B"One- family Dwelling District to"AB"Professional Office District in order to operate a day care center out of the existing facilities. The subject property, previously used as a school, was converted to a church use which now operates only on week-ends. Church and school uses are permitted by right in the"R-1 B" District. The subject property is bound by streets on three(3) sides and single-family residences on the fourth side. The adjacent street to the north is an arterial, Gollihar Road,with the remaining two (2)streets-Mahan and Kirkwood Drives-being local residential sheets. The property currently has no driveway access to these residential streets. If the property is rezoned to a non-residential district, .. .i Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 8 the Driveway Ordinance would prohibit access to the residential streets provided all lots had access to Gollihar Road. The subject property currently contains eight (8) platted lots, four(4) of which do not have direct access to Gollihar Road. If these lots were to be developed independently,then access to these local streets would be permitted. Therefore, as long as the subject property remains as a single non-residential premise,access to Mahan and Kirkwood Drives would be prohibited. The requested"AB" District is one of the least intrusive non-residential districts permitted and is designed to be generally compatible with residential uses within or adjacent to this district. It permits low-intensity uses such as offices,barber/beauty shops,child care centers,clinics,multiple family and single-family residences. The proposed day care center greatest impact occurs during the morning and afternoon rush hour,when the parents are dropping-off or picking-up their children. Beyond that, the day care center operates typically like an elementary school which would be permitted without any rezoning. A Special Permit for the day care center was not considered appropriate or a viable alternative to outright"AB"zoning since the underlying"R-IB"only permits a one(1) square foot sign. The sign area cannot be increased under a Special Permit. Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report(copy on file). Fifty notices were mailed,none were returned in favor,and 20 in opposition. A petition with 32 signatures was submitted in opposition. Staff recommends approval. Mr. Ralph Bennett,architect, appeared for the applicant and stated that the applicant intends to operate a day-care center. He pointed out that the property has been vacant for approximately 8 years; it has been vandalized, and is an eye sore. He felt that "AB" zoning is the least intrusive zoning, and the most logical for this location. The current access is from Gollihar Road, and it is their intent not to have access to Mahan Drive. He felt that the proposed use is a good neighbor use, which is not detrimental to the neighborhood Mr. Bennett read a letter from Andrew Leone,Pastor of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, into the record, giving the history of the Coggin Memorial School, and supporting the zoning request. Mr. Bennett concluded that the proposed use is a logical use of the property, it would take away an eye sore,and encouraged the Commission to vote in favor of the request. Mr. Robert Rice, 4429 Laura Place, appeared in opposition. He stated that the neighbors don't agree that the building is an eyesore,but agreed that there have been problems with vandalism. He informed the Commission that Little League practices on the property,and that while he was not in opposition to the proposed use,he did not want the zoning changed to"AB". V V Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 9 Mr. Edward Bohnenberger,4518 Kirkwood,appeared in opposition. He concurred with the comments made by the previous speaker. In answer to a question from Commissioner Cook, Mr. Bohnenberger felt that his neighbors are in favor of the day-care center, but not in favor of office buildings. Mr. Rice told the Commission that he did not want apartment buildings on the subject property either. Mr.William Sissamus,the applicant,appeared and stated that the proposed development will be an asset to the area. He felt that he can improve the building and operate a day care system there. Commissioner Serna asked the applicant that in the event the zoning is granted,are there any immediate plans to renovate the building. Mr. Sissamus responded that he will make minor repairs, including a face lift, new playground equipment and a new fence. He added that he intends to run a day-care center only,and the building has enough square footage to suit his needs for the next 10 years. They intend to have a license for less than 100 children. He felt that the facility would be an asset to the neighborhood, and would be convenient for parents. He projected the opening date for the beginning of the school year. Commissioner Perez was of the opinion that the location is ideal for a child care center. Chairman Taylor stated that the neighbors object to"AB"zoning,not a child care center. Commissioner Sema commented that "AB" zoning is the least intrusive of the business zonings. He noted that"AB"would also allow for clinics,hospital,studios,etc. It would not allow multi-family dwellings or apartments. In answer to a question from Mr. Bohnenberger,Mr. Sissamus indicated that he would have to secure the operation and cannot open the playground to the public. He would not have a problem with people using the field. The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Hall suggested reducing the size of the "AB" tract and limiting access to Mahan and Kirkwood Drives. Mr. Harvey informed the Commission and the public that Lots 1 and 4 of Coggin Subdivision were included in this application in error,and are not under consideration for rezoning. New Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 10 He clarified that the "AB"District allows professional office,clinics,hospitals,as well as single- family residences, duplexes and multi-family units. Motion by Hall, seconded by Bertuzzi that this application for "AB" Professional Office District be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that it be denied, and in lieu thereof that"AB"Professional Office District be granted on Lot 3, Coggin Subdivision. In answer to a question from Commissioner Cook,Mr. Gunning indicated that the 20%rule most likely would be in effect when it goes to City Council. Motion passed with Bertuzzi, Cook,Hall,Meinrath,Noyola,Perez, Sema and Taylor voting aye,with Canales being absent. In answer to a question from Commissioner Cook. Mr. Harvey responded that if Lot 3 is zoned"AB",then the applicant cannot use the single-family lots for a playground,which would be considered an"AB"use. He added that a fence would be required between Lot 3 and Lots 2 and 5, Coggin Subdivision. Motion by Cook,seconded by Perez,and passed with Canales being absent that the previous motion be rescinded. Motion by Cook,that this request for"AB"Professional Office District be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that it be denied, and in lieu thereof that Lot 3 Coggin Subdivision be granted"AB"Professional Office District, and a Special Permit for a playground be granted on Lots 2 and 5, Coggin Subdivision. Mr. Berney Seal,216 Oleander,appeared representing the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and the applicant. He stated that the applicant does not have a problem with retaining "R-1B"on Lots 1,2 and 3,Block 7, Central Park Unit 1 (the east side of the subject tract),but requests"AB" zoning on Lots 2, 3 and 5, Coggin Subdivision, where the building and the playground equipment are located. Commissioner Hall commented that would be too large a tract in that area zone"AB". Discussion followed to clarify information. Commissioner Cook revised her motion as follows: Motion by Cook, seconded by Perez, that this application for "AB" Professional Office District be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that it be denied, and in lieu thereof that"AB"Professional Office District be granted on Lots 2, 3 and 5, Coggin Subdivision. it Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 11 Motion passed with Cook,Meinrath,Noyola,Perez,and Sema voting aye,Bertuzzi,Hall and Taylor voting nay, and Canales being absent. NEW Pi ATS Consideration of plats as described on attached addendum. The meeting recessed at 8:12 p.m., and reconvened at 8:20 p.m. FY95 CONSOLIDATED PLAN Commissioner Canales arrived at this time. Chairman Taylor stated that after Mr. Utter made the program presentation he would allow City staff to speak on behalf of their projects then close that portion of the hearing and make the Commission's recommendations. Mr. Thomas Utter, Group Manager, elaborated on the new change in federal regulations which is the Consolidated Plan Program that not only included the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), but also the Emergency Shelter Grants Program (ESG) and the HOME Program. He stated that the Fiscal Year 1995 CDBG allocation from HUD is$4.7 million, $28,286 of previous years funding to be reprogrammed, plus program income in the amount of$700,000. Mr. Utter explained that since 1975 rehabilitation funds have been processed through a City nonprofit corporation,the Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation. This corporation has $14 million in assets and generates over $700,000 per year in program income that is then reverted back to the CDBG program. Mr.Utter informed the Commission that the Department of Housing and Urban Development could possibly rescind approximately eight to ten percent of the program allocation. He explained that a rescission was a decision made by the federal administration to not expend the funds appropriated for a program. A portion of the allocation is rescinded by Executive Order. Mr. Utter explained the way staff would handle the rescission: Two projects in the amount of$527,000 would be contingency(10%of the program). If all the funds are allocated staff would recommend funding those projects,if the funds are cut then the staff recommendation would be to not fund the projects. The City Council's adopted guidelines were discussed. Mr.Utter went through the list of recommended projects for CDBG, HOME and ESG and explained staffs recommendation. Discussion followed on various projects. Ms. Sylvia Perez stated her opinion on providing additional funds for the Homebuyer Assistance. .41110 410 Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 12 Mr.John Mulvenna,CD Administrator, ,.. . ice on behalf of the programs for the Community Development Department. Mr. Carl Cmll, Group Manager, spoke on behalf of Engineering's public street project, Bonita Street. Mr.Carlos Mendez,Superintendent of Park Planning,spoke in favor of the ADA Playground Access Phase I project. Considerable discussion followed on several projects. The members voiced their support for funding on the Gulf Coast Council of La Raza,Inc. and Brooks Chapel Early Childhood Development Center. Chairman Taylor instructed staff when the Consolidated Plan is submitted to inform HUD of the Planning Commission's concerns regarding closing costs and prepaid costs on the Homebuyer Assistance issue. The Commission made motions on the following projects: Motion made by Canales, seconded by Perez and passed unanimously to accept staff recommendation for General Administration. Motion Made by Canales, seconded by Sema and passed unanimously to accept staff recommendation for Single Family/Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program. There was a consensus of the Commission to skip Emergency Repair Program. Commissioner Cook requested that half of the requested funding be recommended for ADA Playground Access Phase I, contingency funds for Fair Housing Training, Headstart Facility and Parent Training Center versus regular funding. Motion made by Bertuzzi to accept all of staff's recommendation. Motion died. Extensive discussion occurred on moving contingency funds from one project to another to be able to come up with$527,000 to fund Gulf Coast Council of La Raza, Inc. and Brooks Chapel Early Childhood Development Center projects. It was the consensus of the Commission to fund Gulf Coast Council of La Raza, Inc. and Brooks Chapel. Mr.Norbert Hart,City Attorney,asked the Commission if they were in consensus agreement with cutting $100,000 of funding for Emergency Repair Program (#3), funding $40,000 for Ole Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 13 Demolition/Replacement and Relocation (#5), $50,000 for Demolition of Vacant Structures (#6). The Commission was in consensus. Chairman Taylor requested a roll call vote not to eliminate Operation Weed and Seed(#10). Sema, Canales, Taylor voting yes; Perez,Meinrath, Bertuzzi, Hall, Cook and Noyola voting no. Motion failed 6 to 3,project not eliminated. Chairman Taylor called for votes by a show of hands on the following projects: $22,400 for Health Clinic Building Handicapped Accessibility (#21) all voting yes not to eliminate project; elimination of $50,000 for Fair Housing Training(#23),it was moved and seconded that the project be eliminated, motion passed 5 to 4; not eliminating Coles Elementary School Gymnasium Rehabilitation(#43), motion passed 5 to 4 for project to be left in. Motion made by Canales, seconded by Meinrath that Brooks Chapel Early Childhood Development Center be contingency funds and exchanged for NCCAA Headstart and Parent Training Center. Motion passed 7 to 2. Motion made by Cook,seconded by Canales to substitute Gulf Coast Council of La Rats, Inc. and remove ADA Playground Access Phase I. Motion passed unanimously. Motion made by Cook, seconded by Serna that $50,000 from Fair Housing Training be recommended for Gulf Coast Council of La Raza,Inc. Motion passed unanimously. There was further discussion on contingency funds. Chairman Taylor called for a motion to accept the FY95 Consolidated Plan Program. Mr.Hart recapped the items previously voted upon by the Commission: Operation Weed and Seed$60,000;Health Clinic Building Accessibility$22,400; Fair Housing and Training zero funds; ADA Playground Access Phase I zero funds; Coles Elementary $70,000; Brooks Chapel Early Childhood full funding in contingency for$262,750;Gulf Coast Council of La Raza,Inc. $264,950 contingency and$32,310 from Demolition of Vacant Structures;NCCAA Headstart voted to zero funds. Leaving a$50,000 balance unallocated funds. Motion by Cook, seconded by Noyola that the $50,000 for Fair Housing Training be contingency funds and that the$50,000 be recommended to Gulf Coast Council of La Raza,Inc. as hard dollars. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Hart read the projects into record. %re 'S Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 14 Motion made by Canales,seconded by Hall to recommend the following projects for funding through the FY95 Consolidated Plan Program to the City Council: CDBG Program General Administration $ 365,000 Single Family/Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program 1,000,000 Emergency Repair Program 800,000 Rehabilitation Services 622,000 Demolition/Replacement& Relocation 140,000 Demolition of Vacant Structures 167,690 Code Enforcement 86,952 Minority Business Opportunity Committee(MBOC) 50,000 Operation Weed and Seed Program 60,000 Comprehensive Planning Assistance 50,000 Mortgage Services System 40,000 Bonita Addition Street Improvements 875,000 Health Clinic Building Handicapped Accessibility 22,400 Coles Elementary School Gymnasium Rehabilitation 75,000 Northside Plaza Pedestrian Improvements 100,000 Wastewater Main Rehabilitation Project(Bonita Area only) 69,234 Ethel Eyerly Senior Center(AARP) 15,000 Boys and Girls of Corpus Christi 22,000 CCISD/Casa Linda Elementary School 20,000 CCISD/Zavala Special Emphasis School 20,000 Corpus Christi Metro Ministries, Inc. 125,000 Gulf Coast Council of La Raza, Inc. (Plus $214,950 contingency) 82,310 Village on the Green Neighbor Care Center 500,000 Nueces County Community Action Agency(NCCAA) Weatherization Program 80,000 YMCA of Corpus Christi Tower Teen Center(ADA Compliance only) 90,000 Contingency funds subject to 100% funding of CDBG allocation in the amount of $214,950 for Gulf Coast Council of La Raza, Inc. ; $50,000 for Fair Housing Training; $262,750 for Brooks Chapel Early Childhood Development Center. ESG Program Corpus Christi Metro Ministries 100,000 Dos Mundos Day School 68,300 Women's Shelter 31,700 V V Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 15 HOME Program Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation Activities New Construction 491,750 Substantial Rehabilitation Including Reconstruction (greater than$25,000) 240,000 Moderate Rehabilitation(less than$25,000) 160,000 Homebuyer Assistance Program 200,000 Administration/Technical Assistance 158,900 Community Housing Development Organization(CHDO)Activities New Construction 100,000 Acquisition and Rehabilitation 238,350 OTHER MATTERS City Council Action 295-3 - Mary Ellen Ruiz Denial per Planning Commission. 295-4 - Mr. & Mrs. H.L. Martin Denied "I-2" and approved "B-3" with a Special Permit for outside storage per Planning Commission recommendations. 395-2 - Don Hall Approved'B-4". 395-3E- Roy Smith Approved screening fence exception. MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED None. Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 16 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Meinrath, seconded by Cook, and passed unanimously that the minutes of the regular meeting of April 5, 1995 be approved. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12 midnight. 4��7/9r 1 /1l 6ix Brandol M. Harvey,AIA,AICP Marcia Cooper f Director of Planning& Development Recording Secretary Executive Secretary to Planning Commission l /Sandee Galvan TUU% Recording Secretary fir' V Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 17 NEW PLATS Addendum to minutes of consideration of plats. Chairman Taylor opened the public hearing for plats. Mr. Gunning stated that the owner of Plat 049536-P 15 requests that the plat be tabled. 1. 049536-P15 Creekway Subdivision Block 2 Lots 54R 55R. 56R& 57R(Final reolat- 1.563 acres). Bounded by Elwood Court on the west, Delwood Street on the north and Kress Circle on the east Owner-Peter H. Brown Engineer-Voss& Voss Motion by Cook, seconded by Perez that this plat be tabled. Motion passed with Canales being absent. Mr. Gunning read the following plats into the record, stating that there are no conditions remaining. Staff recommends approval. 2. 049538-P16 The Lakes Unit 8B (Final- 7.89 acres) Located east of Yorktown Boulevard in a northwesterly direction from its intersection with Oso Parkway Owner- Henry L. Tucker& John Tucker Engineer- Shearer, Plog&Associates 3. 049539-NP24 Prineville Addition Block A. Lots 6B &7B (Amending) (Final replat- 1.850 acres) Located south of Leopard Street and east of Violet Road Owner-Bank of American N.T.& S.A. Engineer- Gunter .. ..f Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 18 4. 049540-NP25 : ••' 1i : • , . _ 14B • ofFi - • - • - Located south of Leopard Street and west of Leonard Drive Owner-E.W. Kocurek Engineer- Gunter 5. 049545-NP26 Moore Plaza. Block 1. Lots 18 & 19 (Final replat- 19.007 acres) Located south of South Padre Island Drive(S.H. 358)and west of Blanch D. Moore Drive Owner-The Estate of Blanche D. Moore, deceased, dba M.E.P. Joint Venture, Inc. Engineer-Urban 6. 049546-NP27 Wvnwood Two Block 7. Lot lA (Final reolat- 2.09 acres) Located southwest of Norton Street and northwest of Melbourne Drive Owner-Alex Garcia& Bertha Garcia Engineer-Urban 7. 1194148-NP93 Saratoga Center. Block I Lot I (Final replat- 1.758 acres) Located southeast of the intersection of Saratoga Boulevard(S.H. 357) and South Staples Street(FM 2444) Owner-Peacock Properties, Inc. Engineer-Urban Motion by Perez, seconded by Bertuzzi, that the above plats be approved. Motion passed with Cook being out of the Council Chambers, and Canales being absent. TABLED PLATS Motion by Hall, seconded by Meinrath, and passed with Canales being absent that the following two plats be removed from table. 4► Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 19 A. 039530-P13 Westaate Heights. Block 1.Lots IA & 1B (Final Renlat- acres) Located south of Up River Road and west of Westgate Drive Owner- Mike McBain Engineer- Sample Mr.Gunning stated that the Planning Commission,at their regular scheduled meeting of March 5, 1995, tabled the above described plat at the request of the owner's engineer, however,the Planning Commission did open the public hearing and entertained comments from the audience regarding their concerns about recorded deed restrictions for Westgate Heights being violated. The residents were concerned about setbacks being reduced, driveways being prohibited on Up River Road, and heavy traffic in the area. The public hearing was closed. The City Legal Department reviewed the deed restrictions and is of the opinion they are still in force. Planning and Traffic Engineering staff visited the site. The Traffic Engineer reviewed the site for compliance with the Driveway Ordinance and concluded that two driveways could be permitted to Up River Road,but they would prefer one driveway to Westgate Drive. The plat,as submitted,meets City Ordinances for approval. The 20%rule is in effect based on written opposition. A three-fourths(3/4)majority of Commissioners present is required to approve this plat. Mr. Hart informed the Commission that if less then 6 Commissioners vote in favor of the plat,the plat is denied. Mr.Mike McBain,owner of the plat appeared and stated that they have been building one-family homes in the$40,000 price range for several years. They intend to build houses on the two lots which meet the "R-1B"minimum requirements, and sell them to first time buyers. In answer to a question from Commissioner Perez, Mr. McBain stated that each lot would contain 6,500 square feet. Commissioner Perez stated that she did not understand the neighbors concern. She added that there are not enough houses in the City at that price range. Commissioner Serna complimented Mr. McBain on his effort to provide affordable housing. ti. 'S Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 1995 Page 20 Mr Gunning stated that the average lot • within the 200' radius is 9,000 - 10,000 square feet, and the average lot size in the imme...ate area is in the 9,000 - 17,000 square feet range. Motion by Perez, seconded by Bertuzzi, and passed with Canales being absent, that this plat be approved. B. 049537-NP23 Island Business Center. Block C.Lots IA & 1B (Final reolat-23.418 acres) Located east of Waldron Road and south of Knickerbocker Street Owner-Shell Land Management Company, Inc. Engineer-Urban Mr. Gunning stated that the applicant's engineer is requesting that this plat be tabled for two weeks. Motion by Cook, seconded by Bertuzzi and passed with Canales being absent that this plat be tabled for two weeks. (H580MC.MIN)