Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 06/16/1993 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL JUNE 16, 1993 - 6:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Shirley Mims, Chairman Lamont Taylor, Vice Chairman * Michael Bertuzzi Robert Canales Laurie Cook Ralph Hall Lupe Longoria Sylvia Perez MEMBERS ABSENT: Alma Meinrath STAFF PRESENT: Brandol M. Harvey, AIA, AICP, Director, Planning and Development Marcia Cooper, Recording Secretary Michael Gunning, Senior Planner Norbert Hart, Assistant City Attorney Robert Payne, AICP, Sr. Planner Mic Raasch, AICP, City Planner David Seiler, City Traffic Engineer CALL TO ORDER Chairman Mims called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. , and described the procedure to be followed PUBLIC HEARING NEW ZONING Winter Maintenance & Landscaping: 693-3 REQUEST; From "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District on Lot 1, F.H. Haler Partition, located on the west side of Cantwell Drive, approximately 235 feet south of Rackley Drive. Mr. Gunning described the land use and zoning in the surrounding area, and stated that the applicant is requesting a zoning change from "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District, to operate a landscape and maintenance business with no outside storage. * Vice Chairman Taylor arrived at 7:20 P.M. SCANNED Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 2 Mr. Gunning summarized the Staff report, informing the Commission of applicable Policy Statements, and quoted from the Port/Airport/Violet Area Development Plan. The applicant proposes to convert the existing single-family residence into the business office, use the garage apartment to house two to four employees, and store equipment and tools within the existing storage buildings. Outside storage is prohibited in the "B-4" District. The subject property is located along Cantwell Drive, a collector street, and along Baler Drive, designed as a local residential street. Cantwell Drive is used by large transport trucks traversing the area to get to Champlin refinery, located to the north. Baler Drive predominantly serves the residences which front on it, and is also one of two (2) access roads to the boat repair and storage area for Gunderland Marine. The Engineering Department has indicated that access would be prohibited to Resler Drive. By limiting access to Cantwell Drive, traffic generated from the proposed business would minimize impact on the surrounding area. The proposed non-residential use is to be located between multiple detached residences on the north, and a vacant single- family residence to the south. The adopted plan calls for this area to transition to business and industrial. uses. The impact of the proposed use on the adjacent residences remaining would be reduced by the installation of required screening fences. The proposed business faces vacant land and Champlin's bulk storage tanks across Cantwell Drive. The rear of the subject property is vacant and faces vacant property across Baler Drive which is bordered by more of Champlin' s bulk storage tanks. With no access permitted to Rater Drive and the existing structures and traffic oriented toward Cantwell Drive, the properties along Baler Drive will receive little or no adverse impact from the subject property. Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report (copy on file) . Thirteen notices were mailed, none were returned in favor and five in opposition. Staff recommends approval. Mr. John Winter, the applicant, appeared and stated that he has started similar businesses in San Antonio and Austin, and both have been successful. Commissioner Canales asked if the developments in Austin and San Antonio were surrounded by tank farms. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 3 Mr. Winter replied in the negative, stating that the developments were located in residential areas. He added that the developments enhanced the neighborhoods, rather than detracted from them. Commissioner Hall questioned if "B-1" zoning would allow the proposed use. Mr. Harvey responded that the applicant needs "B-4" zoning because he will store equipment that would not be typically seen in a neighborhood. "B-1" allows uses that serve the local neighborhood. No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Cook asked if the people who responded in opposition were aware that traffic would not be allowed on Raler Drive. Mr. Harvey responded in the negative. Commissioner asked if there would be noise from the use. Mr. Winter responded that there will be absolutely no noise. Motion by Hall, seconded by Cook, and passed with Taylor and Meinrath being absent that this application be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that it be approved. NEW PLATS Consideration of plats as described on attached addendum. LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE Mr. Harvey reminded the Commission that there was general discussion at the Planning Commission meeting of May 19, 1993 regarding the update to the Landscape Ordinance, which is mandated to be done at this time. He stated that Mr. Mic Raasch, City Planner, was present to make a presentation to the Commission. Mr. Raasch stated that when the Landscape Ordinance was updated in mid-1990, a required update was incorporated in the ordinance, which requires that it be updated by August 1993 . Mr. Raasch noted that the Corpus Christi Area Tree Awareness Council has written a letter in support of the proposed changes, and there has been quite a bit of support in the community over the last five years. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 4 Mr. Raasch reviewed proposed amendments to the ordinance as follows: Sections 278.3 .06 and 27B-1l. Clarify the landscape requirement so that the requirements are implemented consistent with the City' s floodplain management program. Sections 27B.3, 5, 9 and 10. Replace triggering mechanisms for landscaped areas from parking areas to vehicular use areas. This revision will clarify that areas used for any vehicular usage including storage within the street yard is required to provide appropriate landscaping. Section 278-4. Alternative Compliance. Clarify that the alternative compliance review procedure is only for use to resolve practical difficulties of site development. Section 278.7 .02 . Multiple street frontage. The sliding scale for required landscape area and points for sites with multiple street frontages should specify that the respective requirements are based on the highest to the lowest traffic volumes. Section 27B-9.A.3. Landscape requirements for schools, colleges, churches, etc. The requirements should permit required landscape area and points to be provided within 20 feet, not the current five feet, of the edge of vehicular use areas in the street yard. Section 27B-10.A. Point Schedule. A maximum point credit should be specified for any new or existing trees, palms, and shrubs, vines and herbaceous perennials. This will prevent the required points from being disproportionately achieved by a very small number of new or existing plants. Section 278-10.A. Point Schedule - Groundcover. Language should specify that turfgrass is not provided any point credit. Section 27B-10.G. (5) . Written authorization required for achieving landscape points within street rights-of-way. Language should be revised to require written authorization in the form of an indemnification agreement through the Engineering Services Department for achieving points within street rights-of-way. Section 27B-13 . Required Update. Delete and reserve section for possible future amendments. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 5 Mr. Ren Rrenek, 37 Camden, and a registered Landscape Architect, appeared representing the Corpus Christi Area Tree Awareness Council, stating that they support the ordinance, which gives the City an opportunity to beautify areas, but also provides for preservation of the natural areas as well. He was of the opinion that the ordinance is fair. No one appeared in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Bertuzzi, seconded by Perez, and passed with Meinrath and Taylor being absent, that the proposed amendments to the Landscape Ordinance be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that they be approved. Vice Chairman Taylor arrived at this time. The meeting recessed at 7 :20 p.m. , and reconvened at 7 :30 p.m. DISCUSSION ITEM FLOUR BLUFF AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mr. Bob Payne, Sr. Planner, informed the Commission that there are three major items to be addressed. Mr. Payne addressed future land use and zoning for the Whiteley Road area. He reviewed the zoning history of Lot 49 on Whiteley Drive, and Staff and public input on the subject property during public hearings on the Flour Bluff Area Development Plan. Mr. Payne addressed traffic, stating that Whiteley Drive has pavement sections varying from 18' to 22' wide, and which could be widened with full curb and gutter. Traffic generation from any commercial uses are well within the street capacity, and pointed out that if all of Whiteley Drive was developed , including a restaurant at the end of the street, there would be 125-150 vehicle trips per day, which would be well within the traffic capacity of the street. Mr. Payne stated that Staff has identified three alternatives for Lot 49, as follows: Restaurant/Marina use in the existing structure (includes leasing of 12 boat slips) ; - New construction for multi-family uses; - New construction for single-family uses. Staff is recommending a possible compromise of allowing a small restaurant/marina within the existing building. These uses Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 6 should have limited hours of operation to reduce any negative impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and would require rezoning to "B-1° Neighborhood, with a special permit to allow a marina. He noted that "B-1" zoning does not allow bars or taverns, but allows restaurants. Chairman Mims noted that discussion at this meeting addresses land use, and not rezoning of property. Commissioner Canales asked if Staff is making an exception to the Comprehensive Plan with regard to traffic. Mr. Payne replied that Staff' s concern is to protect the neighborhood. The Comprehensive Policies stated that where there is traffic going through a residential area, and it impacts the neighborhood, it should be a concern to the city. Mr. Harvey stated that if this were undeveloped property, it would not be good planning to develop the subject property as it exists, which would be a contradiction to the Policy Statements. He noted that Lot 49 was previously zoned commercial, with residential development on the only street leading up to it. Staff is trying to cure the problem. In answer to a question from Commissioner Canales, Mr. Harvey indicated that when Lot 49 was zoned "H-2", it was the intent of the City Council to allow commercial use. Staff's recommendation recognizes that there is commercial zoning, but there is also a public problem that affects the neighborhood. Commissioners discussed what a possible special permit could regulate, to help protect the neighborhood, but which would allow usage of the property. Commissioner Hall commented that Lot 49 is developed with something unique, and was of the opinion that to have zoned the subject property "H-2" was a mistake, because it is not a commercial location. He felt that Staff' s recommendation was excellent, and hoped that the Commission would support it. Commissioner Canales commented that in the future, traffic generated by the business will affect the neighborhood, and he would like to correct the mistake done in the past. Mr. Harvey reminded the Commissioners that the subject being discussed is land use, and not zoning. Commissioner Canales stated that the appropriate land use is single-family residential. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 7 Motion by Cook, seconded by Longoria, and passed with Bertuzzi, Hall and Mims voting nay, that the public hearing be opened, but limiting the time for each speaker. Chairman Mims opened the public hearing, and stated that each speaker will be allowed 3 minutes. Mr. Tony Peters, Whiteley Drive, appeared stating that he was concerned about traffic on Whiteley Drive. He pointed out an area on Whiteley Drive which is an unprotected culvert with no barricade or barrier. He requested a copy of the replat of Lot 49, because he was of the opinion that Lot 49 was not replatted. His desire was for Staff to recommend that Lot 49 be rezoned to residential rather than "B-2" or "B-1" . Mr. Charles Butler, attorney representing Mr. Jim Ferris, appeared, stating that Lot 49 is presently zoned "B-2"; the present use is a marina with boat slips for rent; the property is under lease to Southwest Research. The property is and has been a marina since its inception, and Lot 49 was a part of the subdivision. Forty six of the 49 lots were deed restricted for residential, and Lot 49 was not deed restricted residential, because it was intended to be a boat club and marina for that subdivision. It was a boat club and a marina for many years. Mr. Butler pointed out that other properties along the water are zoned business, and that there are numerous marinas along the water. He noted that the road is sufficient for traffic per the Planning Department's report, and that the CP&L property is zoned "I-3", which could accommodate an iron smelter or slaughter house. Mr. Butler stated that a tavern is not located on the property; there are no plans for a tavern; that the property is accessible by water; and downzoning to "B-1" or a special permit is inappropriate; but would be preferential to "R-1B" . Mr. Don Stancell, 134 Whiteley appeared and stated that he purchased his property one year ago last February. He noted that the road pavement in front of his property is 17' , and that 6" water lines are needed for fire protection. He pointed out that there is a restaurant and marina within two hundred yards, and questioned why another is needed. He also questioned where Lot 49A is located. Mr. Payne replied that there is no Lot 49A, but rather Lot 49. The original dedicated street that was in front of Lot 49 was closed, and there is a dead-end access and cul-de-sac platted in front of Lot 49 . Mr. Stancell continued that Whiteley Drive is not wide enough for a school bus to turn around. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 8 Commissioner Hall stated that the Commission does not make decisions based on economy, and Mr. Stancell replied that he expected the Commission to make a decision based on what the majority of people want. Ms. Kathryn Zimmerman, 130 Whiteley Drive, appeared and stated that she has lived on that street for 30 years, and she would be happy to have a restaurant on the street. She informed the Commission that the property was zoned for the Laguna Shores Boating Club. Mr. Jack Mortimer, 4334 Ocean Drive, appeared, stating that he previously lived on Lot 46 on Whiteley Drive. He stated that a restaurant would create an awful smell, and the houses would be downwind from it. He also noted that if patrons of the restaurant took their own liquor, there would be drunks on the street. Whiteley Drive is one of the most remote streets in Corpus Christi, with some of the nicest homes in Flour Bluff, and he urged the Commission not to destroy the residential aspect of it. Mr. Roy Love, 150 Whiteley, appeared and stated that to widen Whiteley Drive would cost a lot of money, and to prevent that from happening, the solution would be to zone Lot 49 back to Ms. Sherry Nash, 106 Whiteley, appeared and stated that she is involved in purchasing Lot 49 on Whiteley Drive, where she wants to have a Cajun restaurant and a marina. The business would create a little more traffic, but Whiteley Drive will be able to handle it. She addressed several concerns voiced by neighbors, stating that there is a leash law which would protect pets; that she would operate a full service restaurant, serving alcohol with meals, and cater to families; that she would keep a clean facility so that everyone can enjoy some of the things the City is famous for; that the establishment would be family run and family owned, and which would create jobs. Mr. Cliff Schlabach, 122 Whiteley, appeared and stated that business on Lot 49 is not compatible with their neighborhood, as liquor will be sold, and traffic will be increased. He requested that the property be rezoned to "R-1B", as that is the only thing that will satisfy their neighborhood. He was of the opinion that the business being planned for Lot 49 cannot co-exist in their neighborhood. He requested that the Commission recommend to the City Council that the subject property be zoned "R-1B" . The public hearing was declared closed. Commissioner Hall was of the opinion that to rezone the subject property to "R-1B" would create more problems than it would solve. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 9 Motion by Hall, seconded by Taylor that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the Staff' s recommendation to rezone the property to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District, with a special permit for the marina operation. Vice Chairman Taylor stated that there is already existing land use which neighbors had agreed with, therefore "R-1B" and "B- 2" have co-existed. Now the neighbors want Lot 49 rezoned "R-1B", and they are offering no compromise. Commissioner Bertuzzi noted that Lot 49 is under contract for sale. He suggested that the neighbors purchase the property and rezone it as they see fit. He stated that if the property is rezoned "R-1B" the owner will suffer financial detriment. Mr. Harvey described the process that will be followed once the plan is adopted. In answer to a question from Chairman Mims, Mr. David Seiler, City Traffic Engineer, stated that their department are concerned about traffic generated on any street with residential development. He indicated that the average residential street can accommodate 500 vehicles trips per day, and newly developed streets can accommodate more than 1, 000 vehicle trips per day. Mr. Hall stated that the following alternatives are available: - do nothing, and leave plan as it is; - accept plan as is and concur with Staff's recommendation; rezoned to "R-1B" with a special permit to permit the marina; - rezoned to "R-1B" , which would be counterproductive. Commissioner Hall informed everyone that the possible rezoning on Lot 49 was not initiated by Staff, but rather by the people of Flour Bluff. Commissioner Canales commented that economic growth helps a lot of people, but the Commission's job is not to do nothing, but to make recommendations on facts, listen to input from people who are going to be affected by decisions and recommendations the Planning Commission makes to the City Council. If the people are looking for a recommendation for a rezoning, then the Commission should try to see what can be done to change the zoning. This is a unique situation, and it is not easy. He hoped that the majority of the residents are satisfied. Commissioner Cook was of the opinion that the integrity of the neighborhood is important, and future land use for Lot 49 should be Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 10 residential, but most of the residents purchased their property while the current zoning is in place. Motion resulted in a tie vote with Cook, Hall, Taylor and Mims voting aye, Bertuzzi, Canales, Longoria and Perez voting nay, with Meinrath being absent. Mr. Harvey pointed out that the tie vote means that a decision has not been reached. Chairman Mims instructed Staff to bring back this issue to the Commission in two weeks. The meeting recessed at 8:45 p.m. , and reconvened at 8 :55 p.m. Mr. Payne addressed extension of Debra and Division Road, and reviewed previous discussions on this subject. He stated that the purpose of the plan is to have a plan in place to get a fair amount of right-of-way for ultimate growth. Staff is recommending that Debra and Division Road (including connection with Lola Johnson) be extended, and redesignate Laguna Shores Road as a parkway. The connection of Division with Lola Johnson would be made contingent upon placing a cul-de-sac and fire-lane at the east end of Lola Johnson. This would prevent general public access at the intersection of Laguna Shores Road with Lola Johnson Road, but would permit emergency access. Mr. Payne answered clarifying questions from the Commission. Mr. Seiler indicated that Division is expected to carry more traffic. Commissioner Perez was of the opinion that Don Patricio would be a better feeder street. In answer to a question from Commissioner Cook, Mr. Seiler indicated that a physically sturdy barrier, which would prevent traffic from entering Lola Johnson Drive from Division Road extension would be installed. Mr. Bob Byrd, 273 Lola Johnson, appeared and suggested that Don Patricio be made the east/west feeder road. If Division Road is extended to the east, the residents are afraid that the next step would be to continue it through their neighborhood. He reminded the Commission that their position against Division Road extension is consistent with Dr. McNichols, and with the Flour Bluff/Padre Island Civic League. Mr. Byrd strongly recommended that a proposal be adopted to stop Division Road at Waldron Road. He felt that that would meet the City' s obligation for long term Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 11 transportation, and Don Patricio is already built and would give more road space. Commissioner Hall addressed Mr. Byrd, stating that he seemed concerned that the physical barrier would not be sufficient to keep people from penetrating their neighborhood. Mr. Byrd responded that their objection is that in the future that might change, to allow traffic in their neighborhood. Commissioner Cook commented that if Laguna Shores becomes a parkway, and Debra/Jamaica becomes a thoroughfare, there would be no reason to extend Division Street. Commissioner Hall commented that this plan provides the arterials that are needed in Flour Bluff and protects the integrity of Lola Johnson extending east to Laguna Shores. Ms. Tracy McGill, 254 Lola Johnson, appeared and stated that by having Don Patricio as a thoroughfare, it would control the traffic problem. Mr. Seiler indicated that there is more right-of-way on Don Patricia, but that should not be a deciding factor for traffic pattern. In response to an inquiry by Chairman Mims, Mr. Harvey stated that if the plan does not show Division Road, and it is needed in the future, property that is platted and developed between now and then could make the acquisition of right-of-way so costly, it may even preclude it as an option. Ms. Marie Spear, 909 Red Starr appeared and stated that there are not many people who want to get from Waldron Road to Laguna Shores Road, and the traffic pattern is coming from the west, not going east. She was of the opinion that people will be opposed to Debra/Jamaica extension, because they want their privacy, and it is not needed. She felt that Debra should be connected as far as Purdue, but not needed down to Laguna Shores Drive. Mr. Fred Field, 221 Lola Johnson, appeared and stated that Staff admits to having right-of-way of Don Patricia, which will cost less to extend. He added that Holly Road is on the other side of the railroad tracks, and a trestle is needed to get across the tracks. Me. Judith Reader, 213 Graham Road, appeared and stated that there are about 114 species in the lake, and some are threatened. She felt that there will be a great deal of problems extending Debra/Jamaica to Graham Road because of the wetlands. She made an Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 12 appeal for the wildlife, which will be damaged if a road is installed through the wetlands. Commissioner Cook commented that a road will not be built if the area is not developed, and permits are not granted. Mr. Payne stated that Staff is concerned about the environment, and have met with the Corps of Engineers, Texas Parks and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife representatives, and concluded the road was no infeasible. The public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Cook, seconded by Bertuzzi, and passed with Meinrath being absent, that Debra/Jamaica be extended to Laguna Shores Road, and designate Don Patricio Road as the east/west collector from Waldron Road to Laguna Shores Road. Motion by Bertuzzi, seconded by Perez and passed with Hall voting nay, and Meinrath being absent, that Division Road not be extended from Waldron Road east. Commissioners concurred Staff's recommendation on the following: Delete the Cayo Del Oso Parkway and use the existing street plan and extend Compton Road and Division Road (west of Flour Bluff Drive) ; - Birdwatcher outlooks and parking along Laguna Shores Road; Protection of the Cayo Del Oso Wildlife Habitat; Sidewalks in Flour Bluff; - Water line improvement/fire hydrants; - Overpass improvements at Park Road 22 and Laguna Shores Road; - Deletion of the Neighborhood Park at the end of Glenoak and Roscher Road; - Wastewater Service - elimination of septic systems; - Most critical capital improvements projects for Flour Bluff. Commissioner Hall commented on Policy Statement 5 which has to do with density of residential construction under the Accident Potential Zone. He stated that he would like to see the Flour Bluff Plan, as strongly as it can, restrict the density of residential development along with other uses that may cause concentrations of people in the area between the Naval Air Station, Padre Island Drive, Flour Bluff Drive to Waldron Road. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 13 Mr. Harvey responded that the Policy Statement is worded to try to achieve (long term) no residential in APZ-1 while allowing low density residential in APZ-2 . The Plan allows (short term) for 7 units per acre in APZ-1 and 2, and Commissioner Hall is suggesting reducing to 2-3 units per acre rather than 7. In APZ-1 the Plan seeks to have no new residential in compliance with the Navy' s suggestions. Mr. Hart stated that there was a consensus by the Commission to allow 7 units per acre in APZ-2 . Ms. Katherine Conally addressed the Commission and expressed gratitude and appreciation for their thoughtfulness, patience and attentiveness during the hearings on the Flour Bluff Area Development Plan. She stated that the City should commend the Commission on their responsible posture with the citizenry of Flour Bluff. OTHER MATTERS Mr. Harvey reported on the following City Council action 593-1 Cameron Custom Homes, Inc. Approved. Plat Appeal - Port Aransas Cliffs, Block 15, Lots 21A and 41A. Approved. MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED Mr. Harvey reminded the Commissioners of the Planning Commission Retreat which will be held on Saturday, June 19, 1993, in the Staff Room at City Hall. Chairman Mims stated that Commissioners Canales and Longoria will be absent. EXCUSED ABSENCES None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Hall, seconded by Taylor, and passed with Meinrath being absent, that the minutes of the regular meeting of June 2, 1993 be approved. Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 14 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10 :15 p.m. 7 / B�dol M. Ha ey�D � � Marcia Cooper / Director of Planning Recording Secretary Executive Secretary to Planning Commission Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 15 NEW PLATS Addendum to minutes of consideration of plats. 1) 059342-NP24 WYNWOOD TWO, BLOCK 7, LOT lA (FINAL REPLAT - 2. 09 ACRES) Located southwest of Norton Street and west of Melbourne Drive. Owner - Alex Garcia & Bertha Garcia Engineer - Urban Mr. Gunning stated that there were no conditions remaining on this plat, and Staff recommends approval as submitted. No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Cook, seconded by Bertuzzi, and passed with Meinrath and Taylor being absent, that this plat be approved. 2) 069356-NP34 BEACH PORTION, WATER BLOCK 10, LOT 1-A (FINAL REPLAT - 2 .409 ACRES) Bounded by Interstate Highway 37 on the north, Mann Street on the south, Shoreline Boulevard on the east, and Water Street on the west. Owner - Pemberton Investment Corporation, Inc. Engineer - Naismith Mr. Gunning stated that there were no conditions remaining on this plat, and Staff recommends approval as submitted. No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Cook, seconded by Perez, and passed with Meinrath and Taylor being absent, that this plat be approved. 3) 069358-NP35 LANTANA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BLOCK 6, LOTS 4A, 4B & 4C (FINAL REPLAT - ACRES) Located west of North Padre Island Drive (State Highway 358) south of Leopard Street. Owner - Lathe Jones & David Jones Engineer - Naismith Planning Commission Meeting June 2, 1993 Page 16 Mr. Gunning stated that the owner' s engineer is requesting that this plat be tabled for two weeks. Staff recommends that the plat be tabled for two weeks. Motion by Hall, seconded by Canales, and passed with Meinrath and Taylor being absent, that this plat be tabled for two weeks. 4) 069359-NP36 WOOLDRIDGE CREEK UNIT 9, BLOCK 2, LOT 2 (FINAL - 4.325 ACRES) Bounded by Misty Meadow Road on the north, Wooldridge Road on the south, and Cimmaron Boulevard. Owner - The Bank of Corpus Christi, Tim Clower & R.C. Allen Engineer - Maverick Mr. Gunning stated that there were no conditions remaining on this plat, and Staff recommends approval as submitted. No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed. Motion by Perez, seconded by Bertuzzi, and passed with Meinrath and Taylor being absent, that this plat be approved. TABLED PLAT A. 049332-P14 Calallen Townsite, Block 14, Lot 7A & Block 19, Lot lA (Final replat - 2 .85 acres) Located between Middle Lane and West Buckhorn Street, west of Leopard Street (Interstate Highway 37) Owner - Calallen Baptist Church Engineer - Shearer, Plog & Associates, Inc. Mr. Harvey informed the Commission that City Council has not taken action on approving adjustments to a recent street closure within this plat. This plat needs to be re-tabled. Staff recommends re-tabling. Motion by Cook, seconded by Perez, and passed with Meinrath and Taylor being absent, that this plat be tabled until City Council takes action. (E358MC)