HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Planning Commission - 03/10/1993 MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS- CITY HALL
March 10, 1993 - 6:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Shirley Mims, Chairman
Lamont Taylor, Vice Chairman
Robert Canales
Ralph Hall
Lupe Longoria
Alma Meinrath
lake Sanchez *
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Karm
STAFF PRESENT: Michael Gunning, Senior Planner
Robert E. Payne, AICP, Senior Planner
Lorraine Del Alto, Recording Secretary
Norbert Hart, Assistant City Attorney
Carl Crull, Director of Engineering Services
Grace McNett, CIP Officer
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Mims called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., and described the procedure to be followed.
PUBLIC HEARING
NEW ZONING
Humana of Texas. Inc.: 393-ICS
REQUEST: For a Conditional Sign Permit on Fisher School Tract, located on the east corner of Fort
Worth and Texan Trail.
Mr. Michael Gunning described the land use and zoning in the surrounding area, and stated that the
applicant is requesting a conditional sign permit to install two(2) freestanding signs within a "B-1" Neighborhood
Business District.
Mr. Gunning summarized the Staff Report, informing the Commission of applicable Policy Statements.
The applicant is requesting a conditional sign permit to install two (2) freestanding signs. The property
is presently undeveloped and zoned a"B-I" Neighborhood Business District which permits one(I)freestanding sign
per premise with a sign area not to exceed 40 square feet and a height not to exceed 20 feet. The applicant is
requesting a permit to install two (2) freestanding signs with sign areas of 12.4 square feet and 6.6 square feet.
The proposed signs are 12 feet in height. The signs will advertise Humana Hospital's proposed medical office
complex to front Fort Worth Street and Texan Trail.
Jake Sanchez arrived at 6:45 pin.
SCANNED
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 2
Under the Conditional Sign Permit for Business District regulations,the Planning Commission is authorized
to approve limited sign increases if certain findings are made. The sign increases are limited to a maximum of 50
percent of the matter-of-right sign area and height and maximum of 100 percent on the number of freestanding
signs. The applicant is requesting one(1)additional freestanding sign. This increase is the maximum 100 percent.
The applicant is not requesting additional height or sign area permitted in the "B-1" District.
One of the findings that the Planning Commission must make is "the location or relocation of entrance
ways(s) to the business in relation to the public right-of-way, provided that such sign increase furthers traffic
movement objectives such as reducing the number of entry ways." The subject property has four (4) existing
driveways off Fort Worth Street and one (I)driveway off Texan Trail. The proposed driveway closest to the Fort
Worth/Texan intersection is located on Fort Worth Street approximately 255 feet away. The proposed medical
office layout reduces the number of driveways on Fort Worth to three (3), and keeping the closest driveway to
Texan Trail at 255 feet. No driveways are proposed on Texan Trail. The signs would improve directions to the
Fort Worth Street entrances, thereby, facilitating traffic flow off Texan Trail. The location and reduction of
driveways is consistent with the traffic movement objectives stipulated under the Conditional Sign Permit for
Business Districts. Approval of the conditional sign permit must not permit the placement of any freestanding sign
within the visibility triangle.
Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report(copy on
file).
Twenty-seven notices were mailed, three were returned in favor, and one was returned in opposition from
within the 200' notification area. Staff recommends approval of a Conditional Sign Permit for two(2)freestanding
signs located outside the visibility triangle as per the applicant's specifications and site plan.
Mr. Smith, representative for Humana of Texas, Inc., appeared before the Commission and presented a
layout of the hospital displaying where requested signs would be located.
No one else appeared in favor or in opposition,and the public hearing was declared closed.
Motion by Hall and seconded by Taylor, that the finding that "the location or relocation of entrance ways
to the business in relation to the public right-of-way, provided that such sign increase furthers traffic movement
objectives such as reducing the number of entrance ways" as enumerated in Section 33-1.04, Conditional Sign
Permits for Business Districts,has been met. Motion passed with Canales, Hall, Longoria, Meinrath, Taylor and
Mims voting aye, and Karm being absent.
Motion by Hall and seconded by Taylor, that the Conditional Sign Permit be approved in accordance to
the applicant's site plan and specifications. Motion passed with Canales, Hall, Longoria, Meinrath, Taylor and
Mims voting aye, and Karm being absent.
Xclusively Yours Boutique and Salon: 393-2
REQUEST: From"AB" Professional Office District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District,on Lot
2, Block B, Airline Subdivision,located on the east side of Airline Road, approximately
62 feet north of Lyons Street.
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 3
Mr. Gunning described the land use and zoning in the surrounding area, and slated that the applicant is
requesting a zoning change from "AB" Professional Office District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District to
operate a boutique and hair salon.
Mr. Gunning summarized the Staff Report, informing the Commission of applicable Policy Statements,and
quoted from the Southside Area Development Plan.
The applicant is requesting a change of zoning to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District in order to operate
a boutique and hair salon. The hair salon is a permitted use in the existing "AB" District,but the boutique requires
a business district for retail sales.
The subject property is in the middle of the block with its sole access to Airline Road, an arterial. It is
bordered by a single-family residence on the north, and a car sales lot on the south. The property to the rear is
developed with a single-family residence fronting on Lyons Street,a residential street. The area across Airline Road
from the subject property remains undeveloped and is currently zoned a "B-1" District. Therefore, a "B-t" District
on the subject property would be a logical extension of the adjacent "B-l" District; consistent with the Southside
Area Development Plan's recommended land use of neighborhood commercial, and consistent with the City's Policy
Statements which recommend that commercial districts locate along arterials.
A "B-1" District on the subject property would have minimal impact on the surrounding properties. The
residences to the side and to the rear are physically separated from the subject property by a solid wooden fence.
The property to the south has a Special Permit for auto sales typically found in a "B-4" General Business District.
Traffic generated by the proposed use should have no measurable impact on the area since its only access is to an
arterial.
Mr. Gunning read to the Commission the pros and cons of this application from the Staff Report (copy on
file).
Eleven notices were mailed, three were returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. Staff
recommends approval.
Ms. Theresa Ramirez, applicant, appeared before the Commission and stated that this business would be
an asset for the southside area. She asked the Commission to consider approving the zoning change request.
No one appeared in favor or in opposition,and the public hearing was declared closed.
Chairman Mims asked Staff if any landscape requirements had to be met for this zoning request.
Mr. Gunning replied that the applicant intends to use the existing structure. Therefore, the landscape
ordinance would not apply.
Motion by Canales, seconded by Meinrath, that this application for "B-1" Neighborhood Business District
be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that it be approved. Motion passed with Canales, Hall,
Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor and Mims, and Karm being absent.
NEW PLATS
Consideration of plats as described on attached addendum.
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 4
FLOUR BLUFF AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Mr.Robert Payne announced that Staff will be meeting with Mr. Bob Byrd and citizens of the Lola Johnson
neighborhood to discuss some recommendations to the street plans in the area. He stated that David Seiler has
received the written comments presented by Mr. Byrd at the last Planning Commission meeting, and will be
attending the neighborhood meeting. He added that Staff is continuing to work on the Flour Bluff Plan and is still
receiving information and comments regarding the Flour Bluff Plan.
Mr. Bob Byrd, 273 Lola Johnson, appeared before the Commission and stated that staff and the
neighborhood will be meeting during the next two weeks.
Mr. Roy Love, 150 Whiteley Drive, appeared before the Commission requesting that the zoning within
the Whiteley Drive area be changed to residential instead of it remaining commercial once the Flour Bluff Plan is
in effect.
Commissioner Mims asked what the current zoning was within this area.
Mr. Payne replied that when Flour Bluff was annexed the property located within this area was zoned
"RI-B". It was later zoned "B-4" and in 1983 this property was zoned "B-2".
Commissioner Canales asked if there were any traffic problems within the area the club was located at.
Mr. Love replied that a dead end street was located within the area and there was no problems with traffic.
Mr. Anthony Peters, 170 Whiteley Drive, appeared before the Commission and stated that the one reason
the zoning was changed to commercial was for the Club's operation. He added that there is limited room for
vehicles driven within this location. He asked the Commission to consider recommending that the zoning within
the area be changed to residential.
No one else appeared before the Commission, and the public hearing was declared closed.
Mr. Payne added that a letter was received by the Oso Bay Association stating that they are in the process
of conducting a survey within the Roscher and Glenoak Road neighborhood. The Oso Bay Association is expecting
results of the survey by April 5, 1993.
Commissioner Sanchez asked if a zoning change may be included within the Flour Bluff Plan.
Mr. Payne replied that zoning recommendations may be included within an area development plan. Once
an area development plan is approved by City Council, then Staff may initiate a rezoning process.
Commissioner Taylor asked if a down zoning was acted on in the Westside Area Development Plan.
Mr. Gunning replied that the goal for rezoning within the Westside Area Development Plan was to isolate
the light industrial area and also eliminate any heavy industrial zoning that existed. Some properties were rezoned
from "1-3" to "1-2", and some from "R-1B" to "1-2".
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 5
Commissioner Canales asked if the current zoning was consistent with the Flour Bluff Area Development
Plan and added if traffic was taken into consideration of any zoning changes.
Mr. Payne replied that traffic is taken into consideration for any change of zoning.
FY 92-93 STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Mr. Carl Crull, Director of Engineering Services presented an outline to the Planning Commission
regarding the FY 92-93 Street Capital Improvements. Mr. Crull stated that the Annual development of the Capital
Improvement Program provides for the identification of projects and a financing plan. While a great many projects
were evaluated, we are essentially unable to allocate funds because property tax revenues have been insufficient to
support new debt. No bonds will be issued this year, and the affordability of a bond sale in FY 92-93 has yet to
be determined as the City's operating budget is still being prepared. Furthermore, the inventory of new projects
proposed for a future bond program has remained largely unchanged. Consequently, our recommendations
submitted for the Planning Commission's approval are limited to improvements which can be implemented with
available resources. The Staffs recommended program has been approved by the Transportation Advisory
Committee.
A letter from David Seiler, Director of Traffic Engineering was presented to the Planning Commission
stating that the Transportation Advisory Committee had no objections to the Staff recommended projects, and
unanimously approved the recommended program. The Committee expressed concern for one other specific project
not included in the recommended FY 92-93 program(Corpus Christi State University Access Improvements, Phase
I)and general concern for the City's readiness to move forward other possible projects which could be funded under
the Clinton Administration's Economic Stimulus Program. With regard to the Corpus Christi State University
Access Improvements, the Committee was informed that the Texas Department of Transportation has completed the
Feasibility Study for development of Ennis Joslin Road, Alameda Street and Ocean Drive to a State Highway.
Based on the study, the consensus is that development along the existing route will cause insignificant effects to
environmental and cultural resources of the area. With planning, proposed improvements can incorporate hike and
bike trails, improvement to a channel opening known as the Blind Oso, and reconfiguration of the Alameda Street
and Ocean Drive intersections to improve safety and serviceability. The Texas Department of Transportation is
proceeding with the design of this project.
With regard to the Economic Stimulus Program, Staff has developed a list of projects which fit tentative
criteria for the Economic Stimulus Program. The list of projects does not necessarily represent high priority capital
improvement projects but those which can reasonably be expected to be underway in July, 1993 if funds were
available.
The City's Street Improvement Program continues to be financed primarily by 1986 bonds. A majority
of the projects are either complete or in some phase of construction or design. Of the $49.9 million authorized,
$11.7 million remains to be issued. In considering needs for FY 92-93, it became apparent that, while the
remaining 1986 projects can be deferred until a future bond sale, we must address funding concerns on several
projects during the current fiscal year.
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 6
Recommendations for street improvements in FY 92-93 assumes no bond sale. With the exception of two
1986 projects, there are no critical street improvements for which a bond sale is required this year. The projects
are not urgent. In recommending them for funding in FY 92-93, it is our purpose to meet prior commitments made
by the City. While it would have been preferable to issue authorized bonds,we believe the funds required for these
projects can be advanced from reserves. (A copy of the Street Program report is on file.)
Ms. Grace McNett, Capital Budget Officer, stated that an examination was performed on the need for
projects for the street, public safety, storm sewers, parks, and other programs. She stated that there are several
projects remaining from the 1986 Program, which is the primary source of funding for projects. She added that
the financing capacity at the time is such that new bonds cannot be issued without a tax increase. She commented
that they are uncertain of any plans for a 1993-94 Bond Sale. The priority is to continue to complete the 1986 Bond
Program.
Commissioner Taylor asked if the Wynn Seale School Area Streets, Phase 2 project listed on the Street
Program report have previously been authorized through a Community Development Block Program.
Ms. McNett replied that the Wynn Seale School Area Streets, Phase 2 will be recommended to the
Community Development Block Program (19th Year) currently being prepared for August 1993.
There was some discussion on the amount of monies being recommended on the Community Development
Block Program (19th Year) for August 1993 and the relation to the Street Program Projects.
Chairman Mims asked about the process on Holly Road extensions.
Mr. Crull replied that the Texas Department of Transportation held a public meeting to receive comments
from area residents along Holly Road. The Texas Department of Transportation have obtained environmental
assessments and clearances, and are proceeding to prepare the actual design of Holly Road. The City's participation
is providing right-of-way, performing utility relocation, providing signalization, etc.
There was some discussion on when the railway was built and for what it was used for by the Navy.
Commissioner Mims asked about the Oso Parkway Bridge and the developer's monetary contribution for
the projects.
Mr. Crull replied that there is a$60,000 payment to be received from a Southside developer that will be
dedicated to the Oso Parkway bridge (Southfork&Greenfield Subdivision Connection).
There was some discussion on Everhart Street Overlay/Widening, one of the projects listed on the Street
Program report requiring supplemental funding.
Motion by Taylor, seconded by Canales that the FY 92-93 Street Capital Improvements be approved.
Motion passed with Canales, Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor, and Mims voting aye, Hall abstaining on one
project, the Oso Parkway Bridge, but voting yes on all other projects. Karms being absent.
•
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10. 1993
Page 7
TIME EXTENSION
1. 089261-NP40
ISLAND BUSINESS CENTER UNIT 1 (FINAL REPLAT - 41.401 ACRES)
Located east of Waldron Road between South Padre Island Drive and Graham Road.
Owner - AmeriTrust Texas, N.A.
Engineer - David A. Pyle
Mr. Carl Crull stated that this replat is a result of a City initiated capital improvements project to extend
the construction of Knickerbocker Street when it was approved by the Planning Commission at their regularly
scheduled meeting of Wednesday, September 9, 1992. The City Engineer is requesting a six-month time extension
to allow time for the public improvements to be completed.
Motion by Taylor, seconded by Sanchez that a time extension of six months be approved in order to
complete the require public improvements. Motion passed with Canales, Hall,Longoria,Meinrath, Sanchez,Taylor
and Mims voting aye, and Karm being absent.
EXCUSED ABSENCES
Commissioner Mims stated that she has asked Marcia Cooper to tabulate the amount of absences by
Commissioner Mike Karm. She added that as of the March 10, 1993 meeting, he has been absent 7 times. She
commented that Marcia Cooper has written a note to Commissioner Mike Kann regarding his absences. She also
added that in conversation with Armando Chapa, City Secretary, they would not be appointing Ro Wickham's
replacement until after the April 3, 1993 elections.
February 24, 1993
Mike Karm - Unexcused
Ralph Hall - Excused
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Canales, seconded by Sanchez that the minutes of January 27 and February 24, 1993 be
approved. Motion passed with Canales, Hall, Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor and Mims voting aye, and
Karm being absent.
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 8
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
rear;L ug* q/ Krint ' " 'M ati L% (air)
Brandol M. Harvey, AIA, AICP L aine Del Alto
Director of Planning and Development Re ording Secretary
Executive Secretary to Planning Commission
LDA(MINUTES.16)
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10. 1993
Page 9
NEW PLATS
Addendum to minutes of consideration of plats.
1. 029312-P3
CREEKWAY SUBDIVISION, BLOCK I, LOT 6RR (FINAL REPLAT - 0.532 ACRE)
Located southwest of Cedar Pass Drive east of Everhart Road.
Owner - Jim Maixner Homes
Engineer - Voss & Voss
Mr. Gunning stated that there were no conditions remaining on this plat, and staff recommends approval
as submitted.
No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed.
Motion by Canales, seconded by Sanchez, that this plat be approved. Motion passed with Canales, Hall,
Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor voting aye, Mims being momentarily absent, and Karm being absent from
the meeting.
2. 029315-P4
INVERNESS UNIT A, BLOCK 1. LOT I IR (FINAL REPLAT - 0.144 ACRES)
Located west of the merging point of Glasgow Drive and Snowgoose Road immediately west of the
intersection of Timbergate Drive.
Owner - Benjamin Bmlloths
Engineer - Shearer, Plog& Associates, Inc.
Mr. Gunning stated that there were no conditions remaining on this plat, and staff recommends approval
as submitted.
No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed.
Motion by Canales, seconded by Sanchez, that this plat be approved. Motion passed with Canales, Hall,
Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor voting aye, Mims being momentarily absent, and Karm being absent from
the meeting.
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1993
Page 10
3. 029316-P5
THE LAKES UNIT 5C (FINAL - 1.44 ACRES)
Located west of the future Lake Travis Drive and south of future lake Homava Drive.
Owner - Diamond L. Investments, Inc.
Engineer - Urban
Mr. Gunning stated that there were no conditions remaining on this plat, and staff recommends approval
as submitted.
No one appeared in favor or in opposition, and the public hearing was declared closed.
Motion by Canales, seconded by Sanchez, that this plat be approved. Motion passed with Canales, Hall,
Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor voting aye, Mims being momentarily absent, and Karm being absent from
the meeting.
4. 029317-P6
TARA SUBDIVISION, BLOCK I, LOT 2IR (FINAL REPLAT - 1.110 ACRES)
Located between Armitage Drive and the Cayo Del Oso south of Richland Drive.
Owner - D. Gillman Construction
Engineer - Voss & Voss
Mr. Gunning stated that this plat has one requirement to be met regarding a front yard setback. The
Zoning Board of Adjustment has an application pending before them on March 24, [993 to consider granting or
denying a variance. The Planning Commission cannot take action on this plat until the Zoning Board of Adjustment
has made a decision. The applicant is requesting that this plat be tabled until such action is taken. Staff supports
this request.
Motion by Canales, seconded by Sanchez, that this plat be tabled. Motion passed with Canales, Hall,
Longoria, Meinrath, Sanchez, Taylor voting aye, Mims being momentarily absent, and Karm being absent from
the meeting.