Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Building Code Board Of Appeals - 06/04/1992 - Special aoS A City or ,,���' 4 . : toncorpus Ili 1992 Christi ��,� MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE %,,, IfgeVls4i BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS 'b June 4, 1992 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Philip Skrobarczyk, Chairman Miles Graham, Vice Chairman Robert Bennett Jerry Kramer Tommy McDonald Bill Osborne Charles Sebbert STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Lorenzo Gonzalez, Building Official Tom Utter, Director of Development Services Elizabeth K. Butler, Senior Secretary Chairman Skrobarczyk called the meeting to order at 1:35 p.m. , in the Committee Room on the first floor of City Hall. ************************************************************************* APPEAL NO. 92-13 The public bearing was opened on Appeal No. 92-13. The appellant representing the Lady Lex Museum Association was Shiner, Moseley and Associates, Inc. , requesting a variance to Article 3, Sections B & D and Article 5. Sections A, B & F of the Flood Hazard Prevention Code. Property Description: Lady Lex Subdivision, 2914 N. Shoreline. Mr. Lorenzo Gonzalez, Building Official. referenced the federal regulations located in the National Flood Insurance Program Section 60.6 and read a portion for the record regarding variances, flood insurance rates and the serving of written notice to the appellant. Mr. Gonzalez explained that the provisions of Articles 3 and 5 in summary address three items: 1) the elevation of a structure and supporting facilities in a V22 velocity flood zone requiring a 15 foot elevation to the soffit of the lowest horizontal member of the structure, 2) the structural adequacy of the structure such that it will not become buoyant ((floating projectile) and become a nuisance to the public or cause damage to property adjacent or adjoining the development and 3) development seaward of mean high tide which is restricted development in a velocity zone. Mr. Bud Colwell of Shiner. Moseley and Associates, Inc. , stated that they were responsible for designing the approachway for the U.S.S. Lexington. -ie explained that the Lexington would be located just off SCANNED P.O. Box 9277 • Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 • (512) 880-3000 C1ty OI aI'pliS Building Code Board of Appeals Chrlstt June 4, 1992 4.1.0%. 1.0 Page 2 shore of Corpus Christi Beach and that the approachway from its inception had been intended to provide three functionally dependent uses: 1) a means of ingress/egress for patrons, visitors and staff, in compliance with the Corpus Christi Building Code and the Elimination Of Architectural Barriers Program adopted by the State; 2) a means of vehicular access in particular fire fighting equipment but also service vehicles, and the Museum Association in bring on exhibits; and 3) a means to access utilities, i.e. water, wastewater, electricity, gas etc. Mr. Colwell described some of the unique and technical design features of the approachway in particular its structural capability to withstand wind loads of 105 mph, connections that will allow the structural concrete tees to be released but of a weight greater than water so that they will sink in place and not be of concern to adjoining or nearby property. He additionally explained that the placement of the ship with respect to the approachway will provide shelter from direct storm surge. After a brief discussion a motion was made by Mr. Kramer, seconded by Mr. McDonald and passed unanimously to grant the variance to allow development of an approachway seaward of mean high tide in a velocity zone on the grounds that this action is the minimum necessary required to provide relief, to deny would not be economically feasible for the project, the approachway is a functionally dependent use, the engineering design minimizes the potential for damage and adverse affect to adjoining property. The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m. c. 5A-r"Ak Lorenzo on .lez, . LG:ekb 088C-021.DOC