HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Building Code Board Of Appeals - 11/16/1992n
" 3
City of N�� A1tZ3,
W� Corpus N CFO
Christi
N
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PPEA2
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ALS 2�Zp� Z-G81C
November 16, 1992
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Philip Skrobarczyk, Chairman
Miles Graham, Vice Chairman
Robert Bennett
Jerry Kramer
Tommy McDonald
Bill Osborne
Charles Sebbert
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: John Kendall, Senior Inspector
Erik Johnson, Senior Inspector
E. Kay Butler, Senior Secretary
Chairman Skrobarczyk called the meeting to order at 1:38 p.m., in
the Conference Room on the sixth floor of City Hall.
APPEAL NO. 92-20
Chairman Skrobarczyk stated that this appeal would remain tabled.
ttk;*kt;**%ktt*%rtkk**%%%t**k*%kttt*%%tt*tk;*%kk;t*k%kktt*%kt;**k;t;*tRt;
APPEAL NO. 92-22
The public hearing was opened on Appeal No. 92-22. The appellant
was Marco Mattolini dba Marco's Place requesting a variance to Section
402.2.3.2 of the Corpus Christi Building Code.
Property Description: Lot 11, Block 28 and Lot 7, Block 24, 1002
North Chaparral.
Mr. John Kendall, Senior Inspector, stated that the appellant was
U
requesting a variance to the requirement that the mezzanine not exceed 1/3
of the floor area with respect to the room below. He explained that the
J
proposal exceeded code criteria by approximately 200 square feet.
Mr. Marco Mattolini explained his proposed project and stated that
z
he was prepared to install smoke detectors or whatever type alarm system
that the Board required. He added that the proposed addition would only
m
be used for private meetings, parties and not as additional dining area.
P.O. Box 9277 * Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 • (512) 880-3000
%00%w/Mr
C iry Oi
COtpUS
Chnsti
4R^ 0
Building Code Board Of Appeal
November 16, 1992
Page 2
After a brief discussion motion was made by Mr. McDonald, seconded
by Mr. Graham and passed unanimously to grant the variance contingent on
having additional smoke detectors in the dining area.
APPEAL NO. 92-23
A motion was made by Mr. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Kramer and passed
unanimously to table this appeal because the appellant was not present.
A motion was made by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Sebbert and passed
unanimously to approve the minutes of October 22, 1992 as submitted.
The next item was the discussion of recommendations contained in the
Final Report submitted by the Ad Hoc Foundation Standards Committee.
The following action was taken:
A motion was made by Mr. Sebbert, seconded by Mr. Graham and passed
unanimously to remove the second sentence in item 1(F).
A motion was made by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Sebbert and passed
unanimously to omit item three.
A discussion followed concerning changing item one to read "All
residential slabs shall be designed by a licensed Professional Engineer
having sufficient experience in structural and foundation engineering.
The post -tensioned foundation shall be designed in accordance...". The
Board also discussed adding a new item three which would state that 500
square foot conventionally reinforced slabs could be in accordance with
city standards without the requirement of item two which is inspections.
After the discussions a motion was made by Mr. Sebbert, seconded by
Mr. Graham and passed unanimously that staff prepare a draft of the
changes for review at the next regular meeting.
The Board agreed to hold a special meeting on December 17, 1992
The meeting was adjourned at 3:29 p.m.
Anz4G,�A,6ZDeet-Doe