HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Committee For Persons With Disabilities - 11/12/2002 - Special MINUTES - SPECIAL MEETING
COMMITTEE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
November 12, 2002
Committee Members - Present Committee Members - Absent
Chairperson: Ms. Crystal Lyons Vice Chair: Mr. Roberto M. Flores
Ms. Linda Fallwell-Stover Ms. Sandra Cabazos
Ms. Toni Padilla Ms. Mary J. Saenz
Billy R. Sayles Mr. Glen Ray Torno
Mr. Eloy Soza
CITY STAFF: (ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORTI
Building Official: Park & Recreation Director:
Mr. Kendall for Mr. Art Sosa Dan Whitworth - A (Council)
Human Relations Administrator: Legal Advisor:
Mr. L. David Ramos, Director Mr. Joseph Harney
Human Relations Analyst: Other City Staff Present:
Wanese Taylor Butler Andrew Quittner
Human Relations Management Assistant:
Ms. June Shultz
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Lyons
ATTENDANCE —
Roll Call:
Crystal Lyons — P; Robert Flores — A; Sandra Cabazos — A (Childcare);
Linda Fallwell-Stover—P; Toni Padilla — P; Mary Saenz —A (Out of town);
Billy Sayles —P; Eloy Soza— P; Ray Torno — A (Business).
City Staff: Mr. Kendall for Mr. Sosa; Mr. Whitworth - A (City Council
Meeting); Joseph Harney - P; David Ramos - P; Wanese Butler - P; June
Shultz - P. We had a quorum.
Public - Abel Alonzo
INTRODUCTIONS: N/A
SCANNED
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Special Meeting Minutes - 9/18/02
Distributed by e-mail and/or at the meeting. Ms. Lyons requested a
correction to the last page, third line, requesting clarification on the section
"...Austin has $1 million a year...", and clarified that the City of Austin
passed a Bond Election providing $1 million of funding for ADA, yet
uncertain if it is for a year.
MOTION: To accept the minutes as amended was made by Eloy Soza, and
seconded by Ms. Lyons. A vote was taken and the motion passed.
Special Meeting Minutes - 9/26/02
Distributed by e-mail and/or at the meeting.
1. Ms. Lyons requested a correction to Page 5, third paragraph, requesting
clarification on the section "... the forms...", and clarified that these
forms were "ADA Title II Action Guide" forms.
2. Ms. Lyons made a second correction in that section pertaining
to..."ADA Title II Action Guide" questions..., this allows reader to
know what forms or guide was used.
3. Ms. Fallwell-Stover requested a correction on the second to last page -
the name shown as "Coontz" should be "Counts", referring to Ms. Cindy
Counts of Governor's Committee for Persons with Disabilities in Austin,
Texas.
4. Ms. Lyons also requested a correction on the last page, referencing a
grant, to be modified to reflect "federal grant".
Additionally, Ms. Lyons indicated that during one or both of the prior
special meetings on the ADA Transition Plan, she had expressed her
disappointment in not being allowed to participate in any of the City's Core
Group meetings. Ms. Lyons asked Ms. Shultz to verify which meeting(s)
these comments were made. Ms. Shultz agreed.
MOTION: To accept the minutes as amended was made by Eloy Soza, and
seconded by Toni Padilla. A vote was taken and the motion passed.
OLD BUSINESS: (Discussion and possible action)
This Special Meeting was called to continue to address and update on the
draft Transition Plan.
2
Mr. Ramos began the update with a matrix itemizing the Committee's
requests and recommendations on the ADA Transition Plan. Ms. Butler
distributed the matrix - copy attached.
(The committee began a line-item review of the matrix, with discussion.)
Ms. Lyons asked about the list of individual public comments, previously
requested by Mr. Soza. Mr. Ramos indicated that these public comments
were incorporated into the Transition Plan, and that the matrix in hand was
provided to show those items changed and those completed.
Both Ms. Lyons and Mr. Soza further indicated that we were interested in
reviewing the public comments. Mr. Ramos indicated he believed the
Committee initially wanted those public comments included in the ADA
Transition Plan document, which has already been done as an appendix. Mr.
Soza elaborated by concurring he did request these public comments to be
included in the document. Mr. Ramos indicated that Ms. Butler had
prepared the appendix and that she has left the meeting to retrieve this
information. Ms. Lyons indicated it was the Committee's job to represent
the public and to do so, their review of those public comments is necessary.
Ms. Lyons asked for clarification on the "Complete" status to the item -
Internet accessibility standards. An emailed response from Ms. Susan
Cable, Director of the City's E-Government Department, was read to the
Committee. Ms. Lyons asked that Mr. Ramos speak further with Ms. Cable.
Mr. Ramos indicated E-Government had the new on-line system already.
Ms. Lyons provided Mr. Ramos further information by hardcopy.
Regarding the next item of funding for Senior and Middle Age activities,
Mr. Ramos asked the Committee for clarification of additional funding
and/or increased efforts in compliance. Ms. Fallwell-Stover indicated she
took issue on this matter to include senior citizens, during the previous
concerns and discussion on lack of availability to kids with disabilities. Ms.
Fallwell-Stover added that staff has done "a pretty good job" of going-on
with programs to take care of senior centers, and that this is what she was
hoping. Mr. Ramos indicated staff is in the process obtaining additional
information, which will later be shared with the Committee, including
concerns about transportation. Ms. Fallwell-Stover reiterated her concerns
of accessible programs for all ages and that the accommodation goes beyond
the facility and beyond the youth. Mr. Ramos mentioned the work in
3
process with Park and Recreation for accessibility of programs and policies.
Ms. Fallwell-Stover reminded that there was a lot of commentary (from the
community to C-Bay) about there not being programs or opportunity for kids
with disabilities, and we want to see that change. General discussion ensued
about previous adaptive programs being discontinued and the concern that
replacement programming be inclusive. Ms. Lyons continued with the
matrix, moving on to Item 5, which this also addresses that.
Ms. Lyons questioned Item 7, and also if the Island miles had been excluded
for curb ramps. Ms. Butler indicated that further on the matrix (matrix being
in chronological order) Engineering Director, Mr. Angel Escobar, had
clarified this item at the 10/2/02 Regular Meeting, during his presentation,
with understanding from the Committee that the Island miles would be noted
and given the lowest priority. Ms. Lyons asked if that was done at the CIP
Presentation? Is that in the CIP Guidebook? Ms. Shultz clarified location of
question in minutes:
• First reference pertained to the designation of which category the miles
would fall within. They were in both categories - identification number
of miles each.
• Then there was a request if they could legally withdraw that number of
miles.
• Then there was discussion about classifying them as a lower status, as a
lower priority.
So there were three different references that are combined in this. Ms.
Lyons indicated that in that meeting somehow he agreed that they could be
pulled out. The next item says working - which means checking to see if
they can really do that. So it's not reflected in the CIP guide. Mr. Ramos
indicated that he doesn't know if it is in the CIP document. Ms. Lyons
indicated she just wanted to be clear on this. Because complete to her means
that it's complete, but what Mr. Ramos was going by, was that portion was
completed.
This included Item 8.
Item 9 - Ms. Butler indicated that this pertained to items in Appendix A - as
the bid process has not yet started for these items. There was a concern
previously expressed by Mr. Tomo, suggesting that bidding out with larger
packages could bring the cost down.
(Line item review continued 10-13 with no further questions or comments.)
4
Item 14 - After Mr. Ramos indicated as part of the same information of
Items 4, 5 and 6, Ms. Lyons indicated having to accept yet make sure that it
is brought into line.
Item 15 - Ms. Butler confirmed the City departments were notified.
Item 16 -No discussion - moved on to next item.
Item 17 - Mr. Ramos indicated that this was where at the last meeting there
was discussion about some of the Action Guide not being completed on
programs. Mr. Ramos shared approach to cover all department, beginning
with large departments - Park and Recreation. Ms. Lyons asked if the next
step is to eventually get to the Airport. Mr. Ramos briefly discussed how
services are accessed, after speaking with the Airport Director, Mr. Dave
Hamrick.
Item 19 - Ms. Lyons asked for staff follow-up on:
• Contract with CCISD regarding the Natatorium floor, and
• About any ideas on addressing the facility issues?
At Mr. Ramos request, Mr. Harney agreed to check into the contract matter.
Mr. Quittner indicated that CCISD was responsible for this issue. There
was general discussion. Ms. Lyons indicated however, that the issue has
been raised publicly that two absent Committee members have personally
experienced slippery floors with children with disabilities.
Item 20 - Mr. Ramos indicated they were moved up.
Item 21 - Mr. Ramos indicated that the date of 10/30/02 was changed and so
that moved the dates. We should have everything ready for the Council by
the time they go before the Council and have the CIP approved. Then we'll
just add our (from your recommendations) information. Looking at first
week in January to go back before the Council. It will go back as an
Agenda item.
Item 22 - Ms. Butler indicated Engineering Services is incorporating that
information, but we haven't seen the final document yet. Ms. Lyons
mentioned glancing at some information from Ms. Rose, but didn't recall
seeing it. Mr. Ramos indicated he would get her a book.
5
Item 23 - Ms. Lyons asked if this has been taken into consideration. Mr.
Ramos indicated yes, that Ms. Teniente of Engineering Services agreed to do
so. Ms. Butler indicated Engineering was working with the GIS team. Ms.
Lyons asked if there was something better than GIS? Mr. Kendall indicated
he hadn't heard of anything. Ms. Lyons indicated she would look into it.
Item 24 - Mr. Ramos indicated that was from the original $205 million to the
$125 million. Ms. Butler indicated so that the numbers have, but any other
changes that come out of the CIP, along any that come out of the Planning
Commission or Council regarding the CIP.
Item 25 - Ms. Butler indicated this item is from the October meeting, where
the new format of the CIP had been initially presented before this
Committee. In the itemized listing of various types of dollars - paving,
utilities, street, etc., Engineering is going to have to new category for ADA.
Further, the breaking out the ADA costs for tracking the Transition Plan
projects would just be on reconstruction and retrofitting. The breakout
would not be on the new projects (as recommended by the Committee). Ms.
Lyons inquired about the City's staff upper management response to this
recommendation. Ms. Lyons asked if this means that they agreed to it? Mr.
Ramos indicated he did not know, but he would ask. (Matter being handled
through Engineering Director.) Ms. Lyons indicated that the Committee did
the best they could do by the recommendation that was made and passed
along.
Item 26 - General discussion ensued clarifying status. Mr. Ramos indicated
he would get clarification regarding the priority of the downtown area within
the CIP. Ms. Butler mentioned that the ultimate decision would be after the
Planning Commission, when the item goes to the City Council. More
discussion about status language:
• What completion means - concerns being addressed or completed in
order;
• working on means you don't need to keep pushing on or need to educate
someone about it.
• Don't take your finger off that issue.
Ms. Butler agreed to change the status to "working", to monitor throughout
the CIP process.
Ms. Lyons began by asking Ms. Padilla if these recommendations were
representative of her e-mail?
6
Item 1 - Ms. Butler indicated that this is the item under the Financial
Services Department, utilizing various forms and standard items. This
includes utility billing, payables, receivables, vendors, and that staff have
already received requests for accommodation for large print or Braille. Ms.
Padilla asked about audio aids? Ms. Butler added to have their general
information on tape. Mr. Ramos indicated that it would be in our best
interest to make it in the form of a policy or operating procedure addressed
to all department heads. Mr. Ramos mentioned plans to have staff training
with Ron Sparks, Texas Commission for the Blind. Ms. Padilla mentioned a
better term to use, would be "alternative format". In her profession, when
talking about an audio visual, it refers to items such as flashing smoke
detector, flashing fire alarms. Mr. Ramos agreed that term "alternate
format" was the key.
Then Ms. Padilla raised an issue that was not specifically listed on the
matrix, pertaining to equipment itemized for the Gas Department (TDD
equipment) referring back to Appendix A of the Transition Plan. She
expressed that many people still call through Relay Texas. Also TDD calls
for having to monitor training and how to use the equipment. Mr. Ramos
appreciated this important feedback. Ms. Padilla suggested placing Relay
Texas verbiage on City publications for more awareness. General discussion
ensued. Ms. Padilla appreciated the staffs awareness of the need, but Relay
Texas vs. TDD may be a more cost-effective manner. Mr. Ramos indicated
that he would follow that lead.
Item 2 - General discussion clarifying this item.
Item 3 - Ms. Padilla questioned the types of uses for these monies by the
Recreation Centers. Staff is concerned about requests for accommodations
coming in, where there are no dollars budgeted. This is a place to turn -
funding is available. This is labeled citywide because the requests could
come from any department. General discussion ensued.
Mr. Ramos mentioned contract with Area Council for the Deaf and asked
Ms. Padilla to contact Purchasing about completing the Vendor Packet
information. He will revisit that issue. Ms. Lyons also mentioned that the
other half of that is do we have a contract with the Texas Commission for
the Blind. Mr. Ramos indicated that Mr. Ron Sparks had mentioned it.
7
Item 4 - Continue to schedule another special meeting for next week.
Ms. Lyons asked the Committee members if there were any other items to
discuss before next week. Ms. Fallwell-Stover might have something. Ms.
Lyons indicated that there was one other item she had noted but not yet
discussed on the Library "Assessable Resource Center". Mr. Ramos
indicated already meeting with the Library staff. He suggested that the
Committee have its next regular meeting at the Library and to also tour the
facility. Ms. Lyons asked Mr. Ramos to just let the Committee know when
the meeting was set.
Ms. Lyons indicated that today's discussion items were all the things that
were reflective in the last two meetings. Ms. Lyons asked if there were
anymore concerns?
Ms. Lyons had one concern - not reflected in the minutes - that this
committee set up our purpose on what we agree to. The City Council
believes and trusts that we are informing them or at least expressing our
opinion, and our opinion is being taken into consideration. Ms. Lyons stated
that this committee through special meeting or any other meetings hasn't
said, "Yes, this facility" or "this $600,000 on facilities", we're in agreement
of, or we passed a resolution on, or anything. Ms. Lyons expressed concern
on timing for changes on facilities and possibly being to late in still having
some questions. Also, Ms. Lyons stated that according to Ms. Rose, she was
under the impression that when we agreed to the streets and curb cuts that it
was a blanket endorsement at the regular meeting. Not only the power to
limit what would be done, but also the years when it would be done and it is
reflected in the CIP. Ms. Lyons was concerned about this misrepresentation
to her and others. Ms. Lyons also had concerns about the $600,000 for the
facilities (Appendix A) as too costly and is concerned about the support of
this amount from CDBG. Ms. Lyons further indicated that the Committee
did not have an opportunity to question the buildings (Appendix A),
assuming that these figures never can be changed.
Mr. Ramos indicated those figures were rounded off at a suggestion of
Engineering Services, but agreed to come back with whatever concern the
Committee has and revisit them at the next meeting. Mr. Ramos asked Ms.
Lyons if her main concern was the actual cost associated with things. Ms.
Lyons indicated she believes the facility costs to be inflated at least 20%.
Since CDBG is the funding source, others could use savings from the
8
facilities list if it were reduced. Ms. Lyons also noted the reduced curb ramp
estimate from $205 million to $125 million per the Committee's insight. Mr.
Ramos indicated that we can include that in the next meeting. He indicated
that he could have Mr. Escobar and Mr. Boggs at the meeting. Further
general discussion. Mr. Ramos asked if the Committee had any notes or
highlighted areas on the facilities list, if they could let him know. Ms. Lyons
indicated that the Committee could just do this before the next meeting. Mr.
Ramos indicated he would also include Mr. Art Sosa, as he is an Architect.
Mr. Kendall briefly discussed the handout he distributed pertaining to the
Building Code Ordinance change. Ms. Lyons asked if there were any other
questions or concerns or requests for the Transition Plan? Mr. Ramos
indicated that he believes the CIP goes to the Council the first week in
December, so we would need to meet next week. Ms. Lyons asked if the
information could still be changed. There was discussion about the ability to
change items. Mr. Ramos will ask Mr. Escobar. There was further general
discussion about the last public meeting on the CIP by the Planning
Commission, as it continues from the Public Hearing of last week. Mr.
Ramos will call Ms. Lyons after speaking to Mr. Escobar. Ms. Lyons asked
Mr. Ramos to have the Transition Plan on the Agenda for discussion and
possible action.
Meeting adjourned at 4:55 p.m.
Min tes Approved:
g/6442
rys ls, Cone Chairperson Date
9