HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Corpus Christi Convention & Visitor Bureau - 04/20/1993 sM
aopeasigt
CCACVB BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
MINUTES
TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 1993
3:00 PM
CCACVB BOARD ROOM, 2ND FLOOR
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 3:03PM.
II. Roll Call
Chairman Jones ca/led the roll (ATTACHMENT A).
Directors attending.: Al Jones (Chairman), presiding
Stern Feinberg, Cathy Harrison, Lillian Murray, Shirley Pagan, Bill Pruet, E.J.
Schanfarber, Berney Seal, Barbara Sheppard, and Eugene Urban.
Absent: Roy Mayo, Ricardo Sanchez, and Erich Wendel.
Attending Staff: Keith E. Arnold, Rob Earley, Pat Rousseau, Dana Stephens, and
Dottie Sylvester.
Guests: John Bell (Wood, Boykin & Wolter), Scott McGehee (ITS), Elaine Motl (E.M.
Marketing), Holly Osborn (MDL), Jim Steinberg (Caller Times), and Jerry Van Beveren
(Flusche, Van Beveren, Kilgore).
Ill. Motion to Approve Minutes of March 76, 1993 Board of Directors Meeting
Q The above minutes were moved by Lillian Murray, and seconded by Cathy Harrison
W for approval. Chairman Jones submitted letters for inclusion in the above minutes
related to efforts in bringing Los Barcos to Corpus Christi last year(ATTACHMENT 8).
The minutes were then approved by the Board.
VIV. CCACVB Financial Report
Pat Rousseau, Vice President of Finance & Administration, explained the graphs and
variance reports submitted by her department(ATTACHMENT C). She noted that the
Corpus Christi Area Convention & Visitors Bureau
1201 N. Shoreline. P. 0. Box 2664.Corpus Christi.Texas 78403-2664 USA N�PYD
(512)882-5603. 1-800-678-0CEAN, FAX: (512) 882-4256
2
variance report shows expenditures that are plus or minus 10% over or under the
budget. When asked by Chairman Jones whether there were any concerns the Board
needs to know of, the response was "no". Mrs. Rousseau noted that she and Mr.
Arnold had met with the City yesterday regarding the CVB's budget. It was pointed
out that the City would be paying the Bureau the balance of the payment due them
by the end of May rather than over a three month period. The City has penalized the
Bureau $28,000 for receiving overpayment last year. This overpayment occurred in
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year and arose out of an estimated figure being used
rather than an actual. Shirley Pagan asked when the Bureau would be receiving
$73,000 from the USS Lexington. Chairman Jones responded that that should occur
within 30-60 days although that was not definite. This would help the Bureau's cash
flow. It was also reiterated that the CVB is guaranteed 57.62 million by the City of
Corpus Christi from City occupancy taxes. A question arose regarding the usage of
the Bureau van -- if it was fulfilling the purpose for which it had been obtained. The
response was "yes"because it was an effective tool to utilize for negotiation with the
three transportation services currently being used by the Bureau.
V. Departmental Reports
Keith Arnold gave a brief overview (ATTACHMENT D) noting that there had been a
significant increase in visitors from Mexico for Holy Week. Two Bureau employees,
Ann Neese and Elena Ramirez, will be going to Mexico for Encuentro Amigos del
Turismo to build on that. He noted that he was pleased with the convention activity
reports as the conversion from leads to bookings is running over 50%. Also, visitor
inquires are up over 58% from last year.
At this time, Mr. Arnold introduced Scott McGehee of Intelligent Technological
Solutions, Inc. (ITS) to explain on the fulfillment services his company is providing for
the CCACVB. Mr. McGehee began by stating that he has a background in tourism
which covers over 20+ years, i.e. Aquarena Springs. Three years ago he started a
fulfillment service in San Antonio. On a daily basis for San Antonio, he downloads
three computer systems of visitor information requests. Additionally, he receives
coupons from magazines for San Antonio as well as labels from publications. ITS
handles 100% of San Antonio's envelope stuffing.
ITS also handles fulfillment services for all of Mexico and Texas Monthly Magazine.
They have the capability to design computer software to help individual firms, i.e. the
software that the CCACVB uses in their lobby was written by them. They also have
the capacity to maintain every request that the CCA CVB receives on a database and
can perform surveys for the Bureau, i.e. how many requests converted to a trip, what
income areas responded to advertising. He pointed out that the reason they can offer
these services is because they have "the equipment and the people". Mr. Arnold
interjected that ITS has offered the Bureau efficiencies in 800 costs, etc. and that
they can download the input from our front desk. "They have capabilities for however
big we grow. " He pointed out that, hopefully, the CCACVB will be able to buy space
as a coop partner in San Antonio's mail-out packets. This would cut the cost
,M
appeaeithet
3
drastically for the CVB as it would pay no postage at all and instead would pay per
outgoing piece. The CVB would be looking at being able to send 25,000 pieces over
a certain time for less than 15 cents per piece. When asked if the CVB would be a
billing for ITS the response was that San Antonio wouldn't want to get involved in
that. Instead, the CVB would send a check with any pieces it wanted sent out which
would get them "out of the bookkeeping business". It was confirmed that a mailing
list was currently being processed. The option of a label system would a/so exist.
The question arose as to what method the CVB would pursue in getting coop
partners. The response was that a mailing would be done to the hospitality industry,
the Area Council and the Regional Tourism Council.
Mr. Arnold stated that he had had a computer consultant come in recently to the
Bureau to assess its overall automation capabilities principally focusing on software
and to a lesser degree hardware. An emphasis was stressed on motorcoach tracking
and upgrading the housing system. The consultant's report will be presented to the
Board in June.
He noted that last week he had visited with the State Division of Tourism in Austin
to "put down rumors" that have been circulating lately regarding the CCACVB, i.e. it
is doing away with tourism. He felt his reception had been "positive" and that we
have the basis for a "good relationship with them". Also noted was that the State
has a lot of data the Bureau can use, i.e. research and statistics. Mr. Arnold has been
elected to the TACVB Board of Directors.
VI. John Bell: Los Barcos Bylaws, CVB Bylaws, CVB Articles of Incorporation, USS
Lexington Resolution
Mr. Bell began by addressing the Bureau's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
/ATTACHMENT El. As the Bureau's articles were originally set up to expire after 50
years rather than being perpetual, Mr. Bell felt that would need to be changed. Also,
he thought it would be important to amend the articles to indemnify the Bureau's
directors(corporate indemnification is state-of-the-art). Additionally,he recommended
the purpose clause be updated to correspond with the IRS, that the registered agent
be updated and that voting member status for non dues paying Chamber members be
eliminated. In order to amend the articles of incorporation, he suggested having a
vote taken by the Chamber members at one of their breakfast gatherings. It was
asked if this matter had been brought to the Chamber's attention. The response was
"no". Mr. Bell had informed the Chamber he was performing "clean-up work for the
CVB". It was reiterated that "non-voting members would be best rather than ones
who question Board actions". Mr. Arnold suggested spelling out limitations for
members so that they would know what services they are entitled to.
On a motion made by Berney Seal and seconded by Chairman Jones, the above
changes to the CVB's Articles of Incorporation were approved by the Board.
.M
Gay>
4
Although the CVB Bylaws were addressed next, it was suggested that the Board defer
on them until the Articles of Incorporation were completely taken care of. One of the
proposed changes to the bylaws would consist of deleting members and establishing
an associate category. Mr. Bell also pointed out that under the new bylaws, four
members of the Chamber of Commerce could be added to the Board and two
members from affiliated organizations, i.e. Lexington, could be included. He felt this
would give the Board flexibility to have up to six additional members. He also pointed
out that in the new bylaws an Executive Committee would be added which would
comprise three officers of the Board and three directors at-large.
A discussion arose regarding absences and forfeitures of Board membership. One of
the concerns was that in raising the number of directors on the Board, a higher
quorum would be needed. The response was that the Board had the option to reduce
the quorum requirement, i.e. one-third, one-half. It was also pointed out that any
additional directors appointed would be for one year of service only. A decision was
made that the bylaws would state any director missing more than three meetings per
fiscal year would forfeit membership on the Board. They would be notified after
missing their second meeting -- by the fourth missed meeting they would already be
gone. Bill Pruet made a move to table the above discussion on the CVB Bylaws which
was accepted by the Board.
Regarding the resolution for the USS Lexington (ATTACHMENT F/, Mr. Bell explained
the reason why the it was being handled was to "isolate liabilities" the Bureau might
have for the Museum. It was pointed out that the pier improvement contracts were
created in the name of the Bureau and the Lexington Association. A question arose
if the Bureau was transferring ownership back to the Lexington. The response was
that the Lexington is the lessee under the lease with the City. As the Bureau
guaranteed the debt service for the Lexington, the only liability it has for the City is
$3 million. With the resolution and quitclaim deed, the CVB would not be named as
a party in any liability cases. At this point in time, the Navy has not been cooperative
with Mr. Bell in preparing a new agreement which would eliminate the Bureau's
responsibility, from the Navy's perspective, for the Lexington. It was stressed that
with the resolution and quitclaim deed the Bureau would be "giving up assets to avoid
liabilities associated with the assets". It was clarified that the resolution would cover
the approachway and the vessel itself and that the Bureau was obligated to the Navy
for the vessel and not the public. When asked if he had spoken with the City
Attorney regarding this matter, Mr. Bell responded that the "Lexington is the lessee.
The Bureau's only obligation is the $3 million debt service". The quitclaim deed would
eliminate any premises liability element. On a motion made by Mr. Pruet and
seconded by Berney Seal, the Board approved the resolution and quitclaim deed.
The last topic addressed by Mr. Bell was the Bylaws for Los Barcos (ATTACHMENT
G). He pointed out that the Bureau would have no financial liability whatsoever for
the ships and that the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws for Los Barcos were
subject to appointment and approval by the CCA CVB Board of Directors. There would
be 20 people on the Board for Los Barcos. It was also stressed that the name the
I
GoGYv
5
association would prefer to use now for the ships is Las Carabelas rather than Los
Barcos. On a motion made by Mr. Seal and seconded by Barbara Sheppard, the above
articles of incorporation and bylaws were approved by the Board.
VII. Flusche, Van Beveren & Kilgore (FVBK): CVB Audit
Jerry Van Beveren made a presentation on the 1992 audit his firm had done for the
CCACVB (ATTACHMENT H).
He gave the Board a "short course in auditing"and elaborated on the following charts:
Generally
Accepted
Accounting
Principles
GAAP
Who determines GAAP?
AICPA
FASB
- Industry.
Generally
Accepted
Auditing
Standards
GAAS
Who determines GAAS?
A/CPA
CPAs
- Judgement.
What Auditors Must Do
o Issue an opinion re: GAAP
o Report conditions to the Board or owners
o Provide recommendations
o Be your advocate.
41
.M
God
6
What Auditors Don't Do
o Find all errors
o Find out if anyone is stealing
o Tell clients what they must do.
Mr. Van Beveren stated that in their audit they found no materials weaknesses in the
CCACVB (material weakness being the "worst case" scenario) nor did they find
anything out of the ordinary in financial statements. He addressed the management
letter which had gone out with the audit and the following four points:
1) There was a delay in the completion of the CVB audit as FVBK had to
finish the Lexington audit first. The Lexington audit took longer than
anticipated due to lack of records and internal control problems. He
suggested that the CVB select an auditor this year before the end of
their fiscal year. He stressed that the auditor chosen for the Lexington
should be the same auditor for the CVB because of their subsidiary
arrangement.
2) Financial reporting to the Board should include a balance sheet (assets,
liabilities, receivables, payables), a projection for the next 30 - 60 days
and the cash needs of the CVB. He felt more information was needed
by the Board.
3) More information should be readily available on third party contractors.
He suggested requiring quarterly reports as part of any contracts.
4) Accounting Controls for special events, i.e. Los Barcos, are needed
which would show what the actual operations are. In the case of Los
Barcos, there were no records to show where problems occurred.
Internal controls need to be in place for auditors to examine, i.e. to see
if the handling of cash is being done well.
A question arose if the Bureau has contracts with third parties. The response was
that it has letters of agreement. It was suggested by Mr. Van Beveren that rather
than requiring audits of third parties, the CVB has them conform to staff reports.
Chairman Jones noted that "standard operating forms and procedures will be
developed by the CVB". He also felt that the Board should expect to see
"management's response to the management letter". He elaborated that he wanted
a financial report package devised that would meet the needs of the Board. He
expressed the desire that the President "work with financial people to determine what
the Board needs". On a motion made by Stern Feinberg and seconded by Mrs.
Sheppard, the Board approved having the President provide them with balance and
financial sheets and other related documents.
SM
aValatigt
7
VIII. New Marketing Committee
Mr. Arnold noted that the first meeting of the newly formed Marketing Committee
would held on Friday, April 23rd. There will be three additional meetings held after
that before the next Board meeting so that their findings can be presented to the
Board in May. He listed the makeup of the committee: Lillian Murray (Chairman),
Stern Feinberg, E.J. Schanfarber, Bill Morgan (Holiday Inn-Emerald Beach), Susan Taft
(Tejas Management Systems, Inc.), Pat Townsend(Pacific Southwest Bank) and Ariel
Garcia (Geico/Garcia Insurance Agency).
IX. Elaine Mork Miss Texas Pageant/APBA
Elaine Mod began by distributing a report on the 1993 Miss Texas USA Pageant
ATTACHMENT I). She noted that the Bayfront Convention Center requirements have
been met and that a press release had been done on the pageant February 1st. It was
pointed out that a few more hotels are still needed to commit to the event. The
opening number for the pageant will take place on the deck of the Lexington with the
contestants doing a dance routine on the flight deck. The Lexington will also be part
of the City documentary. To-date, Crystal Productions has not obtained network
sponsors. When questioned about that, Ms. Motl remarked that she was surprised
at that also but was told by Crystal Productions they are "holding out to find the
largest sponsor". Mr. Arnold interjected that that would not impact the Bureau as the
pageant will be on network television.
Regarding the American Power Boat Association (APBA) race, Ms. Mot/ began by
stating that she has been "unsuccessful all three years getting sponsorship for it".
She gave a brief history of the race's beginning in Corpus Christi and how she became
the promoter for the event.
She noted that in February she had sent a letter to the people in the community
regarding the APBA race. There was not a large response. At this point, she
informed the APBA the race would be canceled. They told Ms. Mot/ they would bring
in another marketing company to help sponsor the event. When they went to
PEPSICO, they were turned down. Ms. Motl stated that she would be willing to share
revenues with the Bureau or pay back money, but she was not willing to pay for the
event. She also added that Texans should be focused on as an audience.
Chairman Jones reminded the Board that they've committed S10,000 to the APBA
races for promotional use. He asked if the Board could reallocate the $ 10,000
they've already committed, preserving $5,000 of that amount for marketing. Ms.
Motl felt that radio advertising outside the community would be advisable and
specified San Antonio, Austin and Houston. Mr. Feinberg, Mrs. Sheppard and Ms.
Harrison expressed an interest in having the race run again this year. Ms. Harrison
urged the other Board members to "get personally involved"and noted that 58 boats
have committed to coming to this year's race. She felt it would be a "black-eye"if
the race did not occur this year. Chairman Jones proposed "pushing it across the
M
8
finish line for this year" and noted that the Board should not be in this position next
year. Ms. Motl interjected that she would need to know by September if the Board
was going to again support the race. A motion was made by Mr. Pruet to free up
$5,000 of the $ 10,000 already committed by the Board to the race and to add to that
$5,000 another $ 10,000 for marketing purposes. The total commitment by the Board
for the APBA race would be $20,000. This motion was seconded by Ms. Harrison.
It was elaborated that the marketing would consist of paid radio advertising,
promotional giveaways and communications in newspapers and magazines. Mr. Pruet
then made an amendment to his motion regarding splitting of net proceeds -- that the
Board's portion be held in escrow until it was determined whether or not the Board
was supporting the APBA race for next year. If it was determined not to proceed with
the race next year, the money would go into the general fund. This amended motion
was seconded by Shirley Pagan. The above motion and amendment was opposed by
E.J. Schenfarber and approved by the remainder of the Board members present.
X. Old Business
No one brought forth any of the above.
Xl. New Business
Mrs. Pagan brought it to the Board's attention that Lou Gitlin, the new head of
American Airlines in Corpus Christi, would like to be on the CVB Board of Directors.
Mrs. Sheppard informed the Board that the Area Council had a nomination for Area
Council membership to replace Tim McAuliffe's vacated seat. Mr. McAuliffe resigned
because of job relocation to Houston. She noted that she had spoken with Bart Wells,
Mayor of Refugio and an active member of the Coastal Bend Regional Tourism
Council, regarding an appropriate replacement for Mr. McAuliffe. He suggested
Maxine Reilly, an employee of the Museum in Refugio and head of the Refugio County
Historical Society. Ms. Reilly expressed an interest to Mrs. Sheppard in becoming a
member of the Area Council. Mrs. Sheppard reminded the Board that the Town of
Refugio and Refugio County are both paid members of the CCACVB. Prior to the
Board meeting she had polled the other Area Council members regarding Ms. Reilly's
nomination and they were in agreement of it. On a motion made by Gene Urban and
seconded by Ms. Murray, the Board approved Maxine Reilly's election to the Area
Council.
Mr. Arnold noted that approved Lexington Board minutes would be sent out in the
future with CVB Board minutes.
XII. Adjournment to Closed Session
Pursuant to the provisions of the Open Meetings Act, the Board elected at 5:10PM
to go into closed session to discuss matters properly brought before them under
provisions of said act.
Dottie Sylvester
Recording Secretary SM
Gum