HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Landmark Commission - 10/25/2007 MINUTES
LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
OCTOBER 25, 2007
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ms. Bunny Tinker, Chairman
Mr. David Brown
Ms.Anita Eisenhauer
Mr. Myron Grossman
Dr. Richard Moore
Mr. Herb Morrison
Mr. Craig Thompson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ms. Susan Abarca (Excused)
Dr. Clifton Baldwin (Excused)
Mr. Stephen Bowling (Excused)
Dr. James Carter (Excused)
Mr.Art Zeiler (Excused)
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Wesley Vardeman, City Planner
Ms. Linda Williams, Recording Secretary
The meeting was called to order at 4:40 p.m. by Mr. Craig Thompson, Vice Chairman. The roll
was called and a quorum was not present.
ACTION ITEMS:
Approval of September 27, 2007 Minutes: The September 27, 2007 minutes will be approved at
the November meeting.
Advertise to Relocate the Lichenstein House: Mr. Wes Vardeman, Staff Liaison, addressed the
commission. Mr. Vardeman stated that in a meeting with several city staff members and Mr. William
Bell, it was disclosed that potential buyer had been found for the A. A. Lichenstein House. A question
was asked regarding the price of the house and Mr. Vardeman stated that the asking price for the
house was $10,000.00. Mr. Vardeman continued that the city was given the opportunity to purchase
the house, but the City does not have the funding to purchase it. Also, because of the size of the
structure, there really was not an available site large enough to accommodate it on city-owned
property. The house will have to be cut in half to move it. Mr. Thompson asked if there was a time line in
which the housed were to be moved and Mr. Vardeman answered that in talking with Mr. Charnquist, he
had indicated that he wanted the houses to be removed from their current sites by January 1, 2008. If
the houses were not moved, they would be demolished. Mr. Vardeman stated that staff would like for
the Park Department to be able to retrieve some of the old brick from the sites that could be possibly
used as replacements.
Ms. Eisenhauer asked why the site next to the Mary Carroll House would not be a good location
to site the Lichenstein House and Mr. Vardeman responded that the site was too small, especially since
the Mary Carroll House was sited so far back from the street and closer to the building housing the ballet.
The fit would be too tight.
After all comments had concluded, no action was taken.
SCANNED
i
Landmark Commission Meeting --'
October 25,2007
Page 2
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT:
"HC" Designations for the Old Fire Station, Downtown Pump Station and the Kinney Street Bridge:
Ms. Tinker stated that at the September meeting, the commission authorized her to meet with city
department heads responsible for the three proposed sites that the commission was interested in pursing
for"HC" designation. Ms. Tinker continued that she spoke with Fire Chief Richard Hooks, Ms. Valerie Gray
and Mr. 'Angel Escobar regarding the commission's proposal for the three sites. According to Chief
Hooks, the old fire station was going to be costly in making the necessary physical changes. One of the
most costly items would be removal of the lead-based paint. According to Chief Hooks, a feasibility
study would have to be done to get an idea of just what the cost would entail. Ms. Tinker continued that
Chief Hooks did not commit to the idea. Ms. Tinker continued that she did receive approval and
support from Ms. Gray and Mr. Escobar, respectively, to pursue "HC" designation for the downtown
pump station and the Kinney Street Bridge. Since the commission has received the green light for both
projects, the process can be initiated after the holidays.
Status Report on Oak Park Methodist Church and South Bluff Methodist Church: Ms. Tinker stated
that both the Oak Park Methodist Church and the South Bluff Methodist Church were "HC" designated
and she wanted to give a status report on both structures. For the Oak Park Church, members want to
do some work to the interior of the church. The work would entail removing several walls and painting.
Ms. Tinker clarified that the commission has no review authority over the structures' interior so they can
make any changes that want to the inside of the churches.
South Bluff United Methodist Church: Ms. Tinker stated that at one of the previous commission
meetings, the potential buyer for the church attended the meeting and gave a brief overview of his
proposal for the church. At that time, it was suggested to him that once he finalized his plans, he could
come before the commission to do an in-depth presentation. Ms. Tinker continued that during this time,
the church has not been purchased and the "For Sale"sign was still in place.
Memberships: Ms. Tinker stated that Commissioners David Brown, Michelle Braselton and Dr.
Clifton Baldwin's terms expire in November and they were up for reappointment. Commissioner Susan
Abarca had served the maximum term limit and was not eligible for reappointment. Those
commissioners seeking reappointment should complete the necessary paperwork so that the
information could be forwarded to the City Secretary's office for scheduling on the City Council agenda.
Commissioners were encouraged to actively recruit potential members since several vacancies need to
be filled. Commissioners were also reminded that because of the CLG status, different competencies
had to be met. The name of Susan Rucker was submitted as a potential member. A letter will be sent
to Ms. Rucker to see if she is interested in serving on the commission.
Other Reports:
Corpus Christi Caller Times Home Section: Mr. Thompson stated he initiated this project and
because of time restraints and work schedules, the project was phased out. Mr. Thompson stated that
initially when he proposed the concept, he was working with Stephanie Jordan, who was temporarily
working with the Home Section of Caller Times, since Diana Mireles, was on leave. Mr. Thompson
continued that one of the things discussed with Ms. Jordan was that may be the commission could
provide historical information on various structures and other points of interest around the city that would
accommodate a one-fourth (1/4) page in the Sunday Home Section. Ms. Jordan requested the
commission to provide information and pictures for ten to twelve structures that could be featured in the
column. Mr. Thompson continued that he did refer Ms. Jordan to the commission's website of "HC"
designated structures, but he did not follow up with her regarding the information she requested.
Mr. Vardeman added it would be great to have the newspaper coverage on relocation and siting of
the Ropes' House. The coverage could include before and after articles. After a brief discussion, it was
Landmark Commission Meeting -
October 25,2007
Page 3
disclosed that were several houses that could also be featured in the newspaper, especially the "HC"
designated houses along Clifford Street.
Landmark Commission Awards: Ms. Tinker stated that the awards committee had met and
formulated guidelines and a process for the commission's awards program. Ms. Tinker stated since Mr.
Zeitler could not attend today's meeting, she would present the committee's recommendations for the
commission's consideration and approval. The recommendations are as follows:
A. Follow up Implementing Awards Procedure Proposal:
1. A committee will be appointed each year by the Landmark Commission from among
its members (Awards Nomination Committee).
2. Between January 1 and February 28 of each year, members of the Landmark
Commission shall recommend potential recipients for the Architectural Heritage
Recognition Awards.
3. In March, the Awards Nomination Committee shall select one to five nominees for
consideration of the Landmark Commission.
4. The Landmark Commission shall consider the nominees for the awards at its March
and/or April meetings, including those recommended by the Awards Nomination
Committee and select one to five recipients for the awards. The recipients may be
individuals, organizations or other entities.
5. The Awards in the form of an attractive certificate shall be presented at an appropriate
public event to the recipients in May.
*6. The awards should be expanded to include more than just architecture. Recommend
"Historical/Cultural."
*Item 6 was added by Ms. Bunny Tinker, Landmark Commission Chairman.
Designation of City Limits through City Parks & Recreation: Mr. Grossman stated he and Ms.
Tinker went to the Central Library local history room and researched old documents dating back to the
1850s that showed zones of the city that were not included when the city was first incorporated. Mr.
Grossman continued that he and Ms. Tinker would be meeting with Parks and Recreation staff in a joint
effort trying to identify four potential sites for placement of a historical sign/marker. The markers would be
placed where the city limit was before the city was incorporated, city limit at the time of the 1852
incorporation as a city, a site 10 years after incorporation, and a site 20 years after the incorporation.
Mr. Grossman went on to say that they had discussed installing painted signs/markers or curbs for each
site stating the city limits at that particular time. The signs would be placed about 20 feet away from the
curb and the color selected for the sign would be color- coordinated so there would be no conflict with
colors of existing city signs. Mr. Grossman stated there were three (3) definite areas that go back to
1928.
Dr. Moore stated he has located maps dating back to 1832 and in looking at the maps, a lot of
information was provided. Dr. Moore provided brief chronological information regarding streets and
subdivision developments. The map included the 1852 recordation of the city's incorporation, and
showed the boundary of Morgan Avenue to Water Street to the Port, 1852 - 1925 - approximately twenty-
five or thirty new subdivisions were established from Morgan Avenue to Louisiana Parkway. Dr. Moore
continued the maps were very informative.
Landmark Commission Meeting -
October 25,2007
Page 4
•
After all comments concluded, no action was taken.
Discussion Items:
Item A - Proposed Projects for 2007/2008 will be discussed at the November meeting as
outlined. For this agenda item, a rating sheet was Included in the packets for commissioners to rank
each item and return to staff,
Proposed Abandonment of Two Parking Lots located at the Southwest/Northwest Corners of
Heritage Park That Were Originally Planned as Home Sites: Mr. Vardeman stated he had spoken with Park
and Recreation staff about the possibility of turning the two parking lots in the Heritage Park complex
back to sites for placement of historical structures. Mr. Vardeman continued that they were very
protective of the two parking lots and, at this time, they are not willing to relinquish them. It was their
contention that the lots were needed for parking and event serviceability, since the houses generate
money through various rentals and activities. Mr. Vardeman went on to say that at some point, they
maybe agreeable to releasing a portion of the lots. Mr. Vardeman stated he believed the two parking
lots were included in the original Master Plan for Heritage Park. As an update to other matters regarding
Heritage Park, Mr. Vardeman stated in speaking with Chris Semnter, Mr. Semnter shared with him the
department's concern of the increased cost of maintaining the houses in Heritage Park. The increased
cost of repairs has led them to using alternative materials for repairs to siding and wood. They are
proposing to use a material that has a fiberglass base that would provide the same look as the siding
but with longer durability. It also seems that the low bearing columns are causing excessive wear on the
window ledges in some of the houses.
Update on the Relocation and Placement of the Steamboat House: Mr. Brown provided a brief
update on the status of the project for the relocation and siting of the house. Mr. Brown continued he
met with staff and they visited the proposed site for the relocation between the Seamen Center and the
Buddy Lawrence. They walked the site and staked out the footprint of where the house would be
placed. As more information becomes available, the commission will be kept abreast of what's going
on with the project. Mr. Vardeman added that it was first thought that the house could be placed
further back on the lot, but because the site to the back of the lot had been committed for the
Veteran's Band gazebo/band shell; the house would be placed closer to the front of the property. Mr.
Vardeman continued that it was disclosed by staff that $25,000 had been allocated for construction of
the band shell. The Buddy Lawrence House was set further back onto its lot so that when you came out
of the house, one would be able to see the band shell and any activity that was happening in that
area.
Mr. Vardeman stated that a meeting was scheduled for Friday, October 26, 2007, 10 a.m, for
the group to meet at the proposed site to stake the placement of the house. The placement would not
be any different from what was proposed at the September meeting. Mr. Vardeman continued that the
city is running out of land to place any additional structures. Under the leadership of former Assistant City
Manager Tom Utter, an overall master plan for the park was created. Mr, Vardeman continued he
would like to visit with staff that was involved in the original creation of the plan to get a better
understanding of what the original concept was and report back at the next meeting.
Ms. Tinker stated that the Junior League organization, Bob Kip, member of the Landmark
Commission, worked together along with City staff (Malcolm Matthews, Bob Shattuck and Mic Raasch) in
putting together the original master plan. Ms. Tinker emphasized again the importance of the
commission having an overall development plan for the new two-block area where the structures were
being placed.
As an added update on Heritage Park, Ms. Tinker stated she was told that work was done on the
Merriman Boby's House with regard to ADA requirements for the bathrooms and ramps and with regard
Landmark Commission Meeting
October 25,2007
Page 5
•
to the Master Plan, it should not only address and identify potential sites for placement of structures, but
it should also include tree placement. There will be a proposed landing to be placed at the Arts and
Science Park and having a plan in place would be most useful. It should also be noted that the Master
Review Committee needs to be involved at the onset of this project.
As an added note, Mr. Vardeman stated the vacant site near the old Moore's Auction House
and between the Mary Carroll House would be an excellent site for an "old shotgun" house. Mr.
Vardeman continued that were approximately four(4) additional sites in the two-block area.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
odj- A(---.7dtAat' t(14;4 4/44
Linda Villiams Wesley Vardeman, City Planner
Recor ing Secretary Staff Liaison to Landmark Commission
(H:PLN-DIR\LINDA\WORD\LANDMARK\MINUTES\OCT2507.MINS)
SUMMARY SHEET
LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 2007
1. Ms. Bunny Tinker gave a status report on her contact with City Staff on possible "HC" designation
for the downtown pump station, the Kinney Street Bridge and the Carancahua Fire Station.
Approval and support were given on the downtown pump station and the Kinney Street Bridge.