HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Landmark Commission - 07/23/1992 02(29—a-
4110
MINUTES
LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JULY 23, 1992
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Edwin Goodman, Chairman
Ms. Nancy Bowen
Mr. James Catron
Ms. Pam Lakhani
Ms. Alclair Pleasant
Mr. Michael Shelly
Ms. Bunny Tinker
Mr. Joe Williams
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ms. Patricia Atkins
Ms. Mary Ellen Collins
Ms. Cynthia Hill-McKinney
Mr. Leslie Mabrey
Mr. Govind Nadkarni
Mr. Donald Victory
STAFF PRESENT: Ms. Faryce Goode-Macon, Staff Liaison
Ms. Lorraine Del Alto, Recording Secretary
Mr. Michael Gunning, Senior Planner
The meeting was called to order at 4:37 p.m. by Mr. Edwin Goodman, Chairman.
The roll was called and quorum was not present. Upon arrival of Ms. Alclair Pleasant and
Mr. Michael Shelly at 4:40 p.m.,a quorum was declared.
ACTION ITEM(S):
Approval of May 28. 1992 and June 25. 1992 Minutes: The May 28, 1992 and
June 25, 1992 were approved as distributed.
DISCUSSION ITEM(S):
Committee 's Recommendation On Adopting State and National Guidelines
For Naming Historical Designated Structures: Ms. Tinker stated she received
a packet of information on guidelines from Lee Govatos after their meeting
and forwarded the information to Michael Shelly. Ms. Tinker continued she
thought Mr. Shelly would make the presentation, but she had not heard from
Mr. Shelly. After a brief discussion, Ms. Tinker was requested to follow-up
on the information and report at the regularly scheduled meeting in August.
SCANNED
Landmark Commissieeting
July 23, 1992
Page 2
Task Force Report On 1914 County Courthouse: Mr. Goodman commented
that the news media has kept the community abreast of what is happening
with the County Courthouse. At this point, Mr. Catron was asked if he had
additional information regarding the Task Force's activity on the Courthouse
and Mr. Catron responded that the last meeting he attended was in February
1992. Mr. Catron added that at this point the priority is to obtain a clear title
to the property. At the first meeting, the Task Force learned from City Legal
Staff how complicated the legalities are in trying to find out what can and
cannot be done. The second meeting was more or less discussing the same
topic -- various legalities to overcome and clearing the title and, at the same
time, find a person or group who would be willing to undertake the project;
and that person seems to be Mr. Dusty Durrill.
Ms. Tinker asked who would be making the report to City Council in August
as was mandated in the Comprehensive Plan, and Mr. Catron answered he
was not sure, but it was turned over to the Planning Department and he
assumed it would be Brandol Harvey or Kelly Elizondo. Mr. Williams stated
that at some future point, Mr. Durrill would be presenting more detailed
information as to what is happening on the project. At this particular time,
their priority is to get the title transferred and to clear the tax situation.
At this point in the meeting, Mr. Goodman asked Mr. Shelly if he had any
information regarding the State/National Guidelines and Mr. Shelly answered
that he received the packet of information from Ms. Tinker, but he had not
reviewed the information. Mr. Goodman requested that Ms. Tinker, Mr.
Shelly, and Ms. Whitmire meet and review the packet of information with
representatives from the Nueces County Historical Commission so that a
recommendation can made at the next regularly scheduled meeting in August.
Special Meeting - Wednesday. August 19. 1992: Mr. Goodman stated Staff
was requested to select a meeting date for Landmark Commissioners to meet
and review the remaining slides of the historical site survey. Mr. Goodman
continued that the Commission needs to complete the slide review in order
to move forward. This special meeting will be in addition to the regularly
scheduled meeting on August 27, 1992. Mr. Goodman stated that it would be
helpful if Mr. Williams, Mr. Govind, or Mr. Mabrey could attend the meeting,
since their expertise is needed.
CLG Preservation Conference: Mr. Goodman referenced the conference
brochure distributed by Ms. Macon, Staff Liaison. The conference is
sponsored by the Texas Historical Commission and Los Caminos del Rio
Heritage Park and co-sponsored by several other entities. The conference is
scheduled for October 28-30, 1992 at the Fort Brown Hotel in Brownsville,
Landmark CommissioTMeeting 111110
July 23, 1992
Page 3
Texas. Mr. Goodman continued that several commissioners attended the 1991
conference in San Antonio, Texas. The conference provided valuable
information regarding historic preservation and, at the same time,
representatives shared what their cities were doing. The title of the 1992
conference is: "People, Parks, and Partnerships: Our Heritage As
Community Assets." Mr. Goodman stated he would like for three (3)
members to attend the conference. Funding has been provided for
registration, hotel accommodations, and per diem. Mr. Goodman stated if
commission members are interested in attending, they should let Ms. Macon
know by the August meeting so that arrangements can be made.
Mr. Goodman stated Mr. Catron informed him that because of schedule
conflicts, he will not be able to serve as liaison to the Nueces County
Historical Commission. The County Historical Commission meetings are on
the second Tuesday of each month at 5:30 p.m. in the Commissioners ' Court
at the County Courthouse. Ms. Mary Whitmire volunteered to serve as
interim liaison until November.
Ms. Tinker stated she received notification from the Heart of Corpus Christi
that she is officially the liaison for the Landmark Commission and will attend
her first meeting in August. The Heart meets quarterly.
Ms. Macon stated that City Council approved acceptance of the CLG grant
from the Texas Historical Commission (THC) and CDBG. The grant was
returned to THC with appropriate signatures; and the City has received its
copy of the official grant. At this point, Staff is ready to send out bid
proposals to preservation consultants to initiate Phase Il-A of the site survey.
The RFP will be the same as in the past, except the five (5) areas are
different. There will be a forty-five day time limit requesting a detailed
survey be performed on approximately 320 properties, which include two sets
of slides and two sets of prints. A new mailout listing of consultants was
provided by THC. Before the RFPs are mailed out, as done in the past, a
subcommittee should review the RFP before it is sent to the consultants.
Also, THC requested that a copy of the RFP be faxed to their office for
review. After all reviews are completed and changes, if any,incorporated, the
RFPs will be mailed with a requested forty-five day response date. Mr.
Williams served on this committee in the past. After a brief discussion, Ms.
Bowen, Mr. Williams, Ms. Tinker, and Ms. Lakhani volunteered to serve on
the subcommittee. Ms. Macon will arrange the meeting date and time.
Mr. Goodman stated he and Ms. Tinker met with Kelly Elizondo, Director of
Community Development, attempting to establish a new preservation program
between Community Development and the Landmark Commission. Mr.
Landmark Commissioll•Meeting 1111110
July 23, 1992
Page 4
Goodman stated that at the 1991 preservation conference in San Antonio,
Mayor Riley of Charleston, South Carolina was the keynote speaker and he
shared what the City of Charleston was doing in the area of preservation. Mr.
Riley was a strong force in the city's preservation efforts; whereby he
established a system where the city could quickly move and buy properties
that they wanted to renovate. The properties were restored and sold. The
city worked with some of the local lending institutions through the Community
Reinvestment Act where dollars were placed back in the lower income areas.
Property owners were able to buy the property because of the low interest
rates, etc.
At the meeting with Mr. Elizondo, he was asked if the City of Corpus Christi
had an entity with the power and authority to move forward in purchasing
potential properties that are in danger of demolition to restore them and, at
a later date, sell them. Mr. Elizondo answered that the City does not have
an entity in place, but the City is currently trying to set one up. Mr.
Goodman continued that according to Mr. Elizondo, an advertisement was
placed in the newspaper seeking a non-profit organization to be that vehicle.
Mr. Goodman asked Staff for clarification as to why the City has never had
a program set up and Ms. Macon stated that at this time, the primary focus
of the City has been rehabilitation services and neighborhood improvements,
but that focus could include other areas as time goes on.
Mr. Goodman stated that basically through the current program of
Neighborhood Improvement, the primary focus has been on home
improvement loans and rehabilitation of existing properties instead of buying
properties to have them restored.
Ms. Tinker stated in the meeting, Mr. Elizondo kept emphasizing that the
entity had to be ongoing. The Board membership majority has to be of low
income citizens and the program currently in place does not meet some of
those qualifications. Ms. Tinker continued that during their discussion, she
referenced the Furman Avenue Block Association and the fact there is a
spinoff type of application that can be submitted. Ms. Tinker went on to say
that it takes approximately eighteen months to two (2) years to get a non-
profit qualified through the Internal Revenue Service; which could be a
stumbling block. Ms. Tinker added that an existing non-profit could submit
an abbreviated application and become qualified through the IRS as a
different entity; and if this route was to be pursued, the time limit would not
be as lengthy.
Mr. Goodman stated that as a result of the meeting, it was learned that the
City does not have an established entity, but they are working in that direction
Landmark CommissioWleeting
July 23, 1992
Page 5
whereby the City will be able to move forward and act quickly to buy
properties as they become available and restore them.
Ms. Tinker stated that the Commission should follow-up to see if any groups
responded to the advertisements and then maybe the group can be contacted.
Staff was asked if they were aware if any groups had responded and it was
answered no, but Staff would follow-up and report at the August meeting.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:07 p.m.