Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Landmark Commission - 03/24/1994 N V MINUTES LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MARCH 24, 1994 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Edwin Goodman, Chairman Mr. Joe Dove Ms. Cynthia Hill-McKinney Mr. Adam Klager Ms. Pam Lakhani Ms. Alclair Pleasant Mr. Charles Speed Ms. Bunny Tinker Mr. John Wright MEMBERS ABSENT: Ms. Patricia Atkins Mr. James Catron Mr. Leslie Mabrey Mr. Govind Nadkarni Mr. Michael Shelly Mr. Donald Victory Mr. Joe Williams, Advisory STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Michael Gunning, Senior Planner Ms. Faryce Goode-Macon, City Planner Ms. Linda Williams, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order at 4:37 p.m. by Mr. Edwin Goodman, Chairman. The roll was called and a quorum was declared. ACTION ITEMS): Approval of February 24. 1994 Minutes: Ms. Tinker requested that a statement be added to the minutes to clarify that the proposed owners did not pursue purchasing the Lichenstein House because of the parking SCANNED Landmark Commission Alining `s March 24, 1994 Page 2 requirements only, but in addition, the purchase price of the house was too expensive. After a brief discussion, the following statement was amended and reworded: Page 3 - Discussion Itemfsh Update On the Lichenstein House Plan. Ms. Macon continued that after the proposed owner found out about the parking requirements. . . ether factors involved, they decided to pursue another avenue. "In addition to the above factors, the purchase price of the house was too expensive." IT WAS MOVED BY MS. TINKER AND SECONDED BY MS. PLEASANT THAT THE MINUTES BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED. DISCUSSION ITEMS): Update On Review of National Register Nominations for Corpus Christi Naval Air Station Properties: Mr. Wright stated that the committee had not met to review the nominations. Mr. Wright also stated that Adam Klager was appointed to chair the committee. Mr. Wright continued he was unsure if he could serve on the review committee since he had been asked by the Chaplain to perform some architectural work on the chapel at the Naval Air Station; and the chapel was one of the properties under review. Ms. Macon responded to Mr. Wright's concern in that he could still serve on the review committee; and if action is taken on the report, he could abstain and not vote. Ms. Macon continued that his serving on the review committee would not be a factor if he performed work on the chapel. Mr. Klager stated the review committee needed to meet as group to tour the facility in order to make submit a recommendation. Mr. Klager continued that the committee is requesting a 30-day extension in order to tour the facility and compile their recommendation. Mr. Goodman stated that the committee would be given the time extension and can submit their Landmark Commission Biting March 24, 1994 Page 3 report at the April meeting. Mr. Klager stated he would contact NAS officials to arrange a date to tour the facility. Ms. Macon stated that she contacted the Texas Historical Commission (THC) and spoke with Amy Dase and was told that THC would like to have something submitted by April or May. A specific deadline was not given, but they would like a recommendation as soon as possible. If the committee can tour the facility, compile their findings and submit their recommendation at the April or May meeting, THC stated that would be acceptable. Report On Historical Review of Railroad Track Proiect Near Holly Road: Ms. Tinker stated she and Ms. Macon drove to the area to review the railroad track project starting at Highway 44, on the far side of South Padre Island Drive, by the Wuensche Grain Company; which is where the tracks connect with the Tex•Mex Railroad. The tracks were followed all the way to this side of the Oso and across the Oso over to the Naval Air Station fence. Ms. Tinker continued that nothing was found of historical significance, but four (4) old switching signals were found in an area along Holly Road east of Old Brownsville Road to Everhart Road. Ms. Tinker stated she was recommending that the four switches be saved and used in conjunction with the bike path as mile markers for bikersljoggers or anyone that uses the path as well as it would be some vestige of what had been. Mr. Dove asked if the bike path started just the other side of Greenwood Drive to Old Brownsville Road and if there were still some commercial activity in that area and Ms. Tinker answered that she understood that there has been no Vain on this spur since 1969. Ms. Tinker continued that as was stated by Mr. Utter at the February meeting, there are large sections, particularly where the tracks cross Kostoryz, where the tracks are completely torn up. Mr. Dove stated he thought Mr. Utter stated that the track was still in use for several companies located near Old Brownsville Road •• Ms. Tinker clarified that the track may be in use near the old grain company. Ms. Tinker went on to say that portion of the railroad track, between Highway 44 and several miles towards Old Landmark Commission Sting Ned March 24, 1994 Page 4 Brownsville Road, has been sold to Berry Contractors and the markers in question are beyond that point. Ms. Macon added that the markers are located close to the County Commissioners' offices where the road runs into Holly Road near Ayers Street. Ms. Macon continued that even though there are only four switches, they could be placed strategically along the bike path. After further discussion, the Commission voted to approve Ms. Tinker's recommendation to salvage and use the four (4) switching signals found in the area between Holly Road and Everhart Road sometime in the future. The Commission agreed to write a letter to Mr. Utter stating there were no historical elements found in the subject area and to proceed with the submittal of the grant proposal and include the recommendation of using the four (4) switching signals. The Old Tower Theater Located In the Six Points Area: Ms. Macon informed the Commission that the YMCA purchased the old Tower Theater; which is to be used as the Teen Community Center. Mr. Johnny Cotten, Architect, has been retained to prepare renovation plans for the building. The theater is listed on the site survey and is considered to be of historical significance to the area because it is one of the few old theaters left in the city. Ms. Macon continued that she wanted to know if the Commission wanted to send a letter to the architect and the YMCA requesting that the renovation plans be sensitive to the historical nature of the building. Ms. Tinker asked if Staff had a copy of the renovation plans and Ms. Macon responded no. Ms. Macon continued the reason she was aware of the project is because a zoning case was submitted to the Planning Department. Ms. Tinker asked why is a zoning change needed and Mr. Gunning answered that the rear of the property is currently zoned "A-2," for multifamily and the owner is requesting a zoning change to "B•5," General Business; which will make the zoning consistent with the front of the property; which is the Old Tower Theater. Ms. Tinker stated a letter should be sent to Mr. Cotten and to the YMCA. Landmark Commission biting V March 24, 1994 Page 5 Ms. Lakhani suggested that the Landmark Commission pursue "HC" designation for the building. Mr. Goodman agreed with Ms. Lakhani's suggestion and asked if the theater would be a good example to pursue for "HC" zoning, especially since it is also a City project. Ms. Hill asked who owned the property and Ms. Macon answered the property is owned by the YMCA. Ms. Hill asked why wouldn't the YMCA want the building zoned "HC?" Ms. Tinker stated the Commission should pursue the "HC" zoning. Ms. Hill asked if the new "HC" ordinance would allow the Commission to pursue such designation and Mr. Gunning stated that depending on the ownership status. Ms. Hill continued that the zoning could be pursued through the category of "private opened to the public" and the facade would he involved only. Ms. Hill continued that the Commission should not start out trying to force the YMCA to designate the building, but the Commission should request them to consider the "HC" designation •• they might agree to it. Ms. Tinker asked about the condition of the interior of the building and Mr. Wright answered that the interior has been mutilated. The theater is not like the Ayers Theater. A question was asked about the use of the building and Ms. Macon stated the building would be used as a teen center with a day care center available; which will be used by teen parents. Ms. Hill stated that the Commission should send a letter to the property owner explaining the theater has historical significance and the Commission would like for them to consider "HC" designation for the structure and maintain the original facade of the building as possible. Mr. Dove asked if the property owner does volunteer to pursue "HC" designation, would it he the front facade of the building involved and Ms. Tinker interjected that the Commission would request that they consider total "HC" zoning for the building. If the property owner does not agree to total "HC" zoning, then the Commission could pursue zoning for the front facade only. Landmark Commission 'Heating 'Is March 24, 1994 Page 6 Mr. Wright stated that the purpose for having "HC" zoning is to seek pure restoration. It is valuable for the YMCA to realize if they pursue the "HC" zoning, a strong image will be projected in the community; and at the same time, some economic benefits will be gained. Mr. Wright continued that when the Commission communicates with them, we should be explicit regarding what we think is important for them to do to the facade of the building. Ms. Hill concurred with Mr. Wright's suggestion. Ms. Macon asked Mr. Wright if he would be available to help write the letter to the YMCA and Mr. Cotten and he answered yes. Ms. Hill was also appointed to help compose the letter. Mr. Wright stated there are some obvious elements to the building that need to be cared for. Ms. Tinker asked if there was a way that the Commission could tour the inside. Ms. Tinker continued she knows that the Commission cannot designate the interior, but it might be helpful to tour inside the building to see if it is really significant. Ms. Hill stated that Wayne Tatman is President of the YMCA and she felt certain that he would be willing to let the Commission tour the building. Ms. Tinker added that it would be good to make verbal contact with Mr. Tatman, if possible and Mr. Goodman asked Ms. Hill to contact Mr. Tatman about the Commission touring the building. Ms. Hill stated she would contact Mr. Tatman, but she wanted to know what approach should be taken. After some discussion, it was decided that Ms. Hill would inform Mr. Tatman that the Landmark Commission would like to tour the interior of the old Tower Theater and the building is listed on the site survey. The Commission will be sending a letter to the YMCA regarding the historical significance of the building and encouraging them to pursue "HC" zoning designation for the building. Ms. Macon recommended that contact be made with Mr. Tatman within the next two weeks to schedule a tour and the letter should also be written since it is possible that Mr. Cotten has already begun drawing the renovation plans. Landmark Commission gating V March 24, 1994 Page 7 Budget For Landmark Commission Fall Awards Ceremony: Ms. Macon stated that the Commission needs to vote on a budget for the fall awards ceremony. The awards ceremony was held last summer in July. Ms. Macon stated 8300 would cover the expenses for the ceremony. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: IT WAS MOVED BY MS. TINKER AND SECONDED BY MS. HILL THAT THE LANDMARK COMMISSION REQUEST $300 FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO COVER EXPENSES FOR THE FALL AWARDS CEREMONY. MOTION PASSED. Mr. Goodman stated that a new Awards Committee was needed. Ms. Patricia Atkins served as chair for the 1993 awards ceremony. Since Ms. Atkins is on a six-month leave of absence, a new chairman should be appointed. After further discussion, a new committee was appointed with Mr. Joe Dove serving as Chairman, and Mr. Charles Speed, Ms. Bunny Tinker, and Mr. John Wright appointed as members. Ms. Macon will provide any help and support to the committee. Ms. Tinker commented that if any commission member has an opportunity to tour the Kress Building, one of the 1993 awards recipient owned by Tim and Dottie Clower, they should do so. The building is really fascinating. Ms. Lakhani asked if a club had located near the Kress Building and Ms. Macon responded that a country-western club called the Blue Whale Tail was located across the street on the corner from the Kress Building, on the same side of the street. Ms. Tinker stated that she wanted to inform the Commission that in reviewing the slides at the February meeting, the site at 1108 South Alameda is being demolished. The structure was partially destroyed by fire and should be removed from the site survey. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: Landmark Commission Ibllreting March 24, 1994 Page 8 IT WAS MOVED BY MS. TINKER AND SECONDED BY MR. DOVE THAT THE SITE AT 1108 SOUTH ALAMEDA STREET BE REMOVED FROM THE PRESERVATION SITE SURVEY. MOTION PASSED. Continued Review and Prioritize Slide of Phase II-A of Preservation Site Sunray: The following slides were reviewed of the North Morgan Area: CRAIG STREET: 807: Structure is a 2-story stuccoed building with alterations to the windows and doors; 4-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, low•pitched hipped composition shingled roof with extended box eaves. Construction date not available; Stylistic Influence • CraftsmanlPrairie Style. Consultant Medium 810: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with detached garage; 2- south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, composition shingle roof, box eaves; and exposed rafter ends. Structure was built in the 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Medium 811: Structure is a 1-story stucco residence with alterations to the doors; 3-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system„ flat built up tar and gravel roof, tile parapet, interior brick chimney on slope. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • MissionlSpanish. Consultant Medium Landmark Commission Pitting March 24, 1994 Page 9 812: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, front gabled composition shingle roof, extended box eaves, exposed rafter ends, and triangular knee braces. Structure was built between 1900.1915; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Medium 827: Structure is a 1-1/2 story framed residence with alterations; 3-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof, box eaves, triangular knee braces; exterior brick chimney on ridge. Structure was built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Craftsman Bungalow. Consultant Medium 901: Structure is a 1-story brick residence with alterations to the windows and doors; 3-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof, box eaves; and exterior brick chimney on slope. Structure was built between 1910-1920s. Stylistic Influence - Tudor Revival. Consultant Medium 907: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with alterations to the doors; 2-story detached garagelapartment with 3-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof with extended box eaves, and exposed rafter ends. Structure was built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence - Bungalow. Consultant Medium 1018: Structure is a 2-story framed residence with alterations to the porch and doors with 4-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, low-pitched hipped composition roof with extended box eaves; stairway to 2nd floor bisects porch. Stylistic Influence - American Four-Square. Consultant Low Landmark Commission Acting March 24, 1994 Page 10 ELEVENTH STREET: 911: Structure is a 1.1/2 story framed residence with alterations to the windows, has a detached garage with 2-east facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof, extended box eaves, exposed rafter ends. Structure was built between 1910.1920s. Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant High 1025: Structure is a 1.1/2 story framed residence with alterations to the porch with 2-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, steeply pitched hipped composition shingle roof with extended box eaves. Structure was built between 1890- 1910; Stylistic Influence • Queen Anne Victorian. Consultant Low 1113: Structure is a 1.1/2 story framed residence with 3-east facing hays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, steeply pitched hipped composition shingle roof, box columns, wooden board, hipped dormers, and pilasters at corners. Structure was built between 1890-1910; Stylistic Influence • Classical Revival Cottage. Consultant High 1116: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with alterations to the porch and windows with 2-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof with exposed rafter ends. Structure was built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Low Landmark Commission Sting March 24, 1994 Page 11 FIFTEENTH STREET: 913: Structure is a 1-story stucco duplex residence with alterations to the porch with 4-east facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete block, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, flat built-up tar and gravel roof. Structure built between 1930.1940s; Stylistic Influence • MissionlSpanish Influence. Consultant Malin FOURTEENTH STREET: 414: Structure is a 2-story stucco building with alterations to the windows, doors, and 1•story addition on the north side with 4-west facing bays, slab foundation, load-bearing masonry structural system, flat built-up tar and gravel roof. Structure built between 1930.1940s; Stylistic Influence • Commercial. Consultant Low 608: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with additions; 2-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation, wood frame structural system, front gabled composition roof with exposed rafter ends. Structure built between 1900.1930s; Stylistic Influence • Shotgun. Consultant Low 610: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with additions; 2-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation, wood frame structural system, front gabled composition roof with exposed rafter ends. Structure built between 1900.1930s; Stylistic Influence • Shotgun. Consultant Low 914: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with additions; 2-west facing bays, skirt wall, pyramidal composition shingle roof with exposed rafter Landmark Commission Sting .400 March 24, 1994 Page 12 ends. 1•bay integral partial width porch with metal brackets, concrete floor. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Medium 1104: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with alterations to windows; 3-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, front gabled composition shingle roof with exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence - Bungalow with Craftsman influence. Consultant Medium Commission: Low 1110: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with alterations to the windows with a detached garage. Structure has 3-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, side gabled composition roof with exposed rafter ends and triangular knee braces. Structure built between 1900.1930s; Stylistic Influence - Classical Revival Cottage. Consultant Medium 1212: Structure is a 1•story framed residence with alterations to the porch; with 2-west facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, front gabled composition shingle roof with exposed rafter ends. Structure built between 1910.1930s, Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Medium HANCOCK STREET: 522: Structure is a 2-story stucco apartment building with 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, Landmark Commission Sting S March 24, 1994 Page 13 shed built-up tar and gravel roof, cast concrete parapet with shell and scroll motifs. Structure was built hetween 1920-1930s; Stylistic Influence • Mediterranean. Consultant High 524: Structure is a 2-story stucco residence with alterations to the porch; 2-story garagelapartment with 3-south facing hays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, steeply pitched hipped composition shingle roof, extended box eaves. Structure was built between 1930-1940s; Stylistic Influence • American Four Square. Consultant Medium Commission: High 615: Structure is a 1-story brick building with alterations to windows and door with 2-north facing hays, slab foundation, load-bearing masonry structural system, flat built-up tar and gravel roof, extended box eaves. Structure built in 1930s; Stylistic Influence • Commercial. Consultant Medium 811.813: Structure is a 2-story brick triplex with alterations to porch and 2-story garagelapartment. Structure has 3-north facing hays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, gambrel composition shingle roof with extended box eaves. Structure built between 1920-1930s; Stylistic Influence - Colonial Revival. Consultant Medium Commission: High 904: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with alterations to porch with 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof, Landmark Commission Sting 'S March 24, 1994 Page 14 exposed rafter ends, triangular knee braces, king and queen bracing in gable. Structure built between 1910.1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Medium 1006: Structure is a 1-1/2 story framed residence with alterations to porch, windows, additions, and garage. Has 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof with exposed rafter ends, triangular knee braces, exterior brick chimney on ridge. Structure built between 1920- 1930s; Stylistic Influence - Bungalow. Consultant Medium 1400-1412: 1-story court of 7 stucco residences with alterations to the porch and windows; 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, side gabled composition and wood shingle roof, box eaves. Structures built between 1920.1930s; Stylistic Influence - Bungalow. Consultant Medium LAREDO STREET: 1222: Structure is a 2-story stucco warehouse with alterations to the windows and doors with 3-south facing bays with slab foundation, load- Landmark Commission Sting March 24, 1994 Page 15 bearing masonry structural system, flat roof with built up tar and gravel, stepped brick parapet. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • none. Consultant Medium 1320: Structure is a 1•story framed residence with alterations to the porch and windows; has 2-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, cross gabled composition shingle roof, exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Low 1331: Structure is a 1-story framed board and batten residence with alterations to the porch and windows; has 2-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, front gable composition shingle roof, exposed rafters. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Folk Cottage. Consultant Lew 1419: Structure is a 1.1/2 story framed residence with alterations to the porch, windows, and doors; 4-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, skirt wall, wood frame structural system, steeply pitched hipped composition shingle roof, box eaves, exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Low MARGUERITE STREET: 1425: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with alterations to the porch and windows; 3-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, pyramidal composition Landmark Commission 11Misting V March 24, 1994 Page 16 shingle roof, exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Low 1622: Site of Mission Iglesia de Dios, Inc. Structure is a 1.1/2 story stucco building with alterations to the windows and additions; has 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, front gabled composition shingle roof, stuccoed false front stepped parapet, box eaves. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Mission Revival. Consultant Medium MARY STREET: MaryfElevontk Corner. Site of the old F. V. Arnim Cotton Gin. Structure is a 1 to 2 story poured in place concrete cotton gin with alterations to windows and door; other buildings on site include metal office and shop building. Has 3-north facing bays, slab foundation, load bearing masonry structural system, side gable corrugated metal roof. Structure built between 1920-1930s; Stylistic Influence • Industrial. Consultant High 1116.1122: Site of five (5) 1-story framed complex worker houses with alterations to the porches, windows, and doors; which are substantially alike. Each structure has 4-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, front gabled composition shingle roof, exposed rafter ends. Structures built between 1920-1930s; Stylistic Influence • Bungalow. Consultant Medium 1207: Structure is a 1-story framed board and batten residence with alterations to the porch and windows with 2-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, front Landmark Commission Orating S March 24, 1994 Page 17 gabled composition shingle roof, exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence • Shotgun. Consultant Medium 1209: Structure is a 1-story framed residence with synthetic siding and alterations to windows; has 2-north facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, front gable composition shingle roof, exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence - Shotgun. Consultant Medium 1420: Structure is a 1-story framed board and batten residence with alterations to the porch and additions; 3-south facing bays, pier and beam foundation on concrete blocks, wood frame structural system, hipped with gable composition shingle roof, exposed rafter ends. Structure built in 1920s; Stylistic Influence - Bungalow. Consultant Medium. This concluded the slide presentation of the North Morgan Area. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6 p.m. Faryce oode yl acon, City Planner Staff Liaison • uw+ra