Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Water Resources Advisory Committee - 03/29/2007 APPROVED MINUTES .2�25���,.� Water Resources Advisory Committee 11:30 a.m. — March 29,2007 4-7.) �` Water Department Conference Room Jl:C ' ' - \ . t�r,^4211 d W C tl�Ecr CE :l ll/S 2,4477 Members present: Jerry Garcia, City Council Liaison, Carola Se: T10-Cp§i0 Ruth Blake, Frank Brogan, Lena Coleman, Michael Cox, Mary--Fant, Leland Johnson and Mark Stroop Member absent: Kimberly Stockseth Staff Present: Ron Massey, Assistant City Manager Eduardo Garana, P.E. Water Director Danny Ybarra, P.E. Assistant Water Director Gary Smith, Assistant City Attorney Max Castaneda, Water Resources Management Advisor Mucio Garza, P.E. Water System Optimizer Ivan Luna, Business Practices Manager Yolanda R. Marruffo, Public Relations and Marketing Coordinator Visitors: Tony Bagwell, HDR Engineering, Inc. Carl Crull, P. E. HDR Engineering, Inc. Mrs. Carola Serrato called the meeting to order at 11:35 a.m. I. Welcome Mrs. Serrato asked that everyone introduce themselves and welcomed new committee members. II. Approval of Minutes The minutes of January 18, 2007 and February 9, 2007 were reviewed. Mrs. Coleman motioned that the minutes be approved; seconded by Mr. Brogan and approved unanimously by Committee members. III. Presentation on the Utility Rate Study Mr. Garana introduced Tony Bagwell of HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide an update to the Committee on the progress made on the water rate study. Mr. Bagwell stated that the City Council was briefed on January 23, 2007 on HDR's concepts. The City Council provided them with direction and asked that they meet with stakeholder groups and report discussions back to them. Stakeholder meetings including the concept discussion that occurred on February 9, 2007 and today's cost of service allocations meeting are in response to the City Council's directive. A third meeting would be scheduled to discuss rate revenue requirements SCANNED 1 r+ f and rate design. The City Council plans to develop a new rate structure as part of the annual budget process. Mr. Bagwell stated that the major steps in the rate study included: • Assessment of existing customer user patterns; • Evaluation of"base year" utility cost and revenues; • Forecasting service demand; • Forecasting utility capital and O&M expenses to "test year" and beyond; • Allocation of cost of service to customer classes; and • Development of rate revenue requirements, proposed rate designs and pricing levels for each customer class. A table of water demand forecast was shown identifying raw and treated water customers based on fiscal year 2005, 2006 and estimated fiscal year 2007 and projected water use for fiscal year 2008 at 23,958.7 billion gallons. Mr. Bagwell reported that the underlying cost factor forecasts identified no new staffing or program changes and inflation rates associated to salaries (3.0%), energy and fuels (5.0%) and other (3.7%). Additional forecast costs included recent and future bond issues, financing of new debt at current rates/terms and interim financing costs at TexPool average rate. By 2008, a total 5.1 percent increase is expected on the cost of service. Mr. Bagwell explained the general concept on the cost of service allocations relative to the use of the City's raw water system, the City's treatment system and the City's network. He identified the numerous composite, contract, raw water and ratepayers that utilize the various segments of the City's facilities. He stated that this methodology is an acceptable rate making concept that assesses the infrastructure utilized by inside and outside limit customers. A table with two columns was shown to identify eight customer/rate classes and functional cost center/rate components. For example, the rate class identified the cities of Beeville, Mathis and Alice to equate to a functional cost center of raw water without a return on equity. Mr. Bagwell stated that the City should consider cost of service allocations for the Assistant City Manager for Public Works, Utility Billing Office, Utility Field Operations, Public Education and Communications, Utility Support Services and Economic Development— Utilities. A second cost of service allocation included storm water cost reallocations to allow the cost recovery of managing the storm water operations. He stated that the system is currently not included in the raw water rates, but is included in the treated water rate. It would be ideal to have the storm water funded by its own revenue; however, if it continues to be funded by water rates, it should be assigned only to inside city limit retail customers. Mrs. Serrato expressed concern that the storm water charges provided no benefit to wholesale customers and that this problem had been expressed to the City in the past. 2 Mr. Bagwell also reported that OCL raw water customers such as Beeville, Alice and Mathis should be allocated their appropriate share of water losses, which are being incurred by the City, interim capital financing costs and fiscal agent fees. He stated that the City must have sufficient revenue to pay its debt. Further discussion included an overview of methodology leading to volume cost of service allocations including raw water systems, raw water diversion and conveyance systems and treatment and network systems and retail distribution system and other factors. The volume cost of service by rate class identified each of the raw and treated wholesale water customers. The rate cost of service was shown for Fiscal Year 2006, Fiscal Year 2007 and the projected Volume Cost of Service for Fiscal Year 2008. The volume cost of service is the pending volume rate being recommended by HDR. The rate design concept as recommended by HDR featuredthefollowing: • Discouraged use of a declining block rate which is often discouraged by TCEQ and TWDB. • Consider a inclining block rate for homogeneous customer classes with highly seasonal use patterns • Consider a series of uniform rates for customer classes with relatively flat use patterns or where the customers are not homogeneous. This offers wholesale and large volume users and commercial users a revenue neutral concept. A graph identifying residential water use patterns identified the summertime peak factor of approximately 2X due largely to lawn irrigation. A graph on commercial water use patterns showed a peak factor of 1.5X due to a mixed class of users. Mr. Bagwell suggested utilizing a uniform rate structure rather than the existing declining block rate structure. Mr. Bagwell stated that the stakeholders groups will be reviewing the preliminary rate structure design and the suggested water pricing. They hoped to brief the City Council in early May and thereafter, identify an implementation plan and schedule. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Fant and seconded by Mr. Brogan. With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:00 pm. 3