HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Water Resources Advisory Committee - 03/20/1996 w
MINUTES
WATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MARCH 20, 1996
The first meeting of the Water Conservation Advisory Committee was called to order at 1:08 p.m. by Dr.
David McNichols, City Council Member. Members present included Jerry Kane, Don King, John McHugh,
Herman Johnson, Allen Schoen, Billy Dick, Dr. Russell Miget, Carola Serrato, Gene Dressen, James
Naismith, Capt. Anthony C. Alejandro, Mark Smith, Dan Davis, Eugene Urban, Charles Bird, Terry Boone,
James Gill, Jim Parker, Caralee Dibble, Dale Nelson, Robert Johanson, Douglas Matthews and Ray
Allen. City staff members present included Bill Hennings, Carl Crull, Victor S. Medina, Eduardo Garana,
Hubert Hall, James Dodson, Malcolm Matthews, Yolanda R. Marruffo and Maria Bazan. Visitors included
Paul Werner and George D. Rangel.
Dr. McNichols discussed the benefits of the diversified group and the responsibility of the Committee to
advise the City Council on short-term water conservation issues.
• James Dodson requested that the Committee members review the Orientation Manual which discussed
the responsibilities of City boards, committees and commissions. The Committee appointed James
Dodson as interim facilitator. Mr. Dodson recommended that a member of the group be appointed
interim chairman at the next meeting, and that a date for election of a chairman and vice-chairman be
set for a future meeting. - --
AMENDMENT TO DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN - CONDITION I
James Dodson presented information on the City's Drought Contingency Plan. He stated that the City
has worked on the acquisition of water for the next fifty years. He stated that the task of the Committee
would be to focus on the extension of our water supplies for the next one to two year period. He reported
that it has been since July 1993 that both reservoirs were at full capacity. He presented statistical data
which demonstrates that we are experiencing drought conditions; however, he felt it would be a
challenge to convince the community which is already water efficient to save additional water. He
reflected on the 33 percent savings which was achieved during the 1984 drought. He stated that the
Committee should consider short-run strategies such as reviewing the trigger levels of the Drought
Contingency Plan.
Don King asked for clarification of the drought contingency provisions in the freshwater inflow plan.
James Dodson stated that if the City enters Condition II of the Drought Contingency Plan, the City would
be able to reduce the 23,500 acre feet freshwater release requirement for May 1996 to 1,200 acre feet.
However, the City would petition TNRCC to suspend the fresh water releases for May and June without
going into Condition II.
Jerry Kane inquired about the regional water demand in 1984 verses 1996. James Dodson reported that
the average annual water use during 1984 was approximately 120,000 acre feet. During 1995, water
demand had increased to 130,000 acre feet per year. Mr. Kane stated that the City needed to fix the
problem and consider developing the pipeline from Lake Texana.
Discussion followed on the City's reservoir system dependable yield. Mr. Dodson reported that it was
probably 30 percent less than originally estimated and would continue to diminish due to sedimentation.
Carola Serrato inquired about the 33 percent water savings that could be achieved and how much of that
would be for industrial verses residential water savings. Mr. Dodson reported that in a study conducted
by the Texas Water Development Board, the co-efficient of potential water savings for local industrial
users was measured at zero. Our local industrial water users utilize about 50 percent as much water to
produce one barrel of oil as compared to other cities in Texas. Mr. Dodson stated that 33 percent of the
savings could be achieved if we went into Condition III and IV of the Drought Contingency Plan.
SCANNED
Jerry Kane asked how long it would take the City to build a pipeline from Lake Texana: Carl Crull
responded that an estimated four year period would be needed. In regards to existing pipelines, he
stated that most pipelines between Lake Texana and Corpus Christi are being used to transport natural
gas to the mideast. The City would consider issuing a request for proposal to solicit the use of a pipeline,
or other means of conveying Lake Texana water to Corpus Christi.
Ford Patton inquired about the operational efficiency of the reservoir system. Mr. Dodson reported that
TNRCC favored lowering Lake Corpus Christi to 76 feet, however, that would place the lake's elevation
below the cities of Beeville and Alice intake pump stations. Don King moved that the Committee
recommended to the City Council amending the Drought Contingency Plan Condition I trigger level from
28 percent to 40 percent of rese`rvoir's capacity. Jerry Kane seconded the motion.
Discussion followed on whether neighboring cities would be required to limit their lawn watering from 10
a.m. to 6 p.m. James Naismith stated that he and James Dodson had previously discussed the issue
and felt it was only fair that neighboring cities adopt the sameregulations and ordinances as adopted
by Corpus Christi.
Richard Hessee asked if there were any quantifiable savings in imposing the odd/even water use
schedule. Mr. Dodson stated that the odd/even water schedule created community awareness and that
quantifiable data was not available. _
James Naismith inquired if there would be any negative issues regarding the amendment to the Drought
Contingency Plan, Condition I to include a 40 percent trigger level. Concern was expressed that the
public could see the Council's action as a late reaction toward amending the Drought Contingency Plan
to change the trigger point to 40 percent since the reservoir capacity was already at 38.6 percent.
Mr. Kane stated that regardless of the trigger point set to initiate Condition I of the Drought Contingency
Plan,we should strongly recommend to the City Council to move with haste on the transmission of water
from Lake Texana. Mr. Kane felt that the public would be confused if the Council set the trigger point
at 35 or 37.5 percent of capacity. Thepossibility existed that inflows would occur during April, May and
June. He cautioned that the City should avoid moving in and out of Condition I.
The Committee voted 12 in favor of and 10 against amending the trigger point of Condition I of the
Drought Contingency Plan to 40 percent.
Paul Werner inquired if. Conditions II, Ill and IV would be amended. Mr. Dodson stated that the
Committee would be asked to review the trigger levels at a later meeting.
LAWN WATERING ORDINANCE
Mr. Dodson presented information on the lawn watering ordinance and opened it for discussion. Allen
Schoen stated that the Mayor's Task Force on Water Conservation Subcommittee had developed the
ordinance in 1994 when the City's reservoir system was at above 60 percent of capacity. He stated that
the ordinance mirrored those developed for San Antonio, Phoenix and El Paso. He encouraged that the
City Council provide a funding mechanism for education. An inquiry was made regarding the
enforcement of the ordinance. Mr. Dodson stated that Water Division employees would be responsible
for issuing citations. Mr. Werner stated that in 1984, neighbors reported each other.
Ray Allen proposed that the ordinance be in effect year around rather than during daylight savings time.
Jim Naismith seconded the motion.
James Gill stated that the ordinance was too simplistic and did not address water saving techniques.
He felt that water savings could be achieved by the public through the use of water efficient showerheads
and toilets. He felt that it was not a good ordinance and that the public would over water lawns during
nonrestricted hours, and proposed that the City implement an education program instead.
Allen Schoen stated that the ordinance discouraged people from watering their lawns during periods
when evaporation and wind were in peak conditions. Mr. Dodson stated that there were alternatives to
provide behavior modification in outdoor water use such as a program known as feebates, which
penalizes customers who consume high quantities of water and rewards those who maintain minimum
water use.
Mr. Kane stated that failure to enforce the ordinance would sound more loudly than the adoption of it.
Billy Dick favored the lawn ordinance as the Portland water treatment plant would have a shift in the
hours of peak water demand, thus making their system more capable of meeting the area's needs.
Mr. Kane motioned to adopt a year around ordinance restricting the use of lawn watering during the hours
of 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. with exceptions as allowed by the ordinance. The Committee voted 17 in favor of
and four against providing a recommendation to City Council to adopt a year around lawn watering
ordinance.
Mr. Kane also made a motion, seconded by Mr. Richard Hessee, to recommend to the City Council that
they proceed as soon as possible with all measures necessary to convey water from Lake Texana to
Corpus Christi. After a brief discussion, the Committee voted to approve Mr. Kane's motion.
Other Business _ _
Discussion followed on the capacity of the City's water wells. Victor Medina stated that the existing wells
could produce approximately 27 million gallons a day(MGD) of water. He further stated that the City
was in the processing of hiring a consultant to review the efficiency of the wells to bring them to
maximum operating capacity.
Mr. Schoen stated that he would like to discuss at the next meeting the possibility of transferring
wastewater effluent back to the reservoirs.
The Committee agreed to meet on Wednesday, April 3, 1996. With no further discussion, the meeting
was adjourned at 4:00 p.m.
(11 ofTO: Water Conservation Advisory Committee Members
COus FROM: James Dodson, Regional Water Director
DATE: March 27, 1996
Christi RE: City Council Action on Committee Recommendations
on Watering of Vegetation and Drought Contingency
• Trigger Levels
Proposed Ordinance Prohibiting the Watering of Vegetation During Certain Hour
The Water Conservation Advisory Committee had voted to recommend that the City Council
enact an ordinance that would prohibit the watering of vegetation between the hours of 10:00 am
and 6:00 pm on a year-round basis. The attached ordinance was placed on the Council's agenda
for March 26, 1996. However, prior to the Council considering the item, the City Manager asked
the Mayor to pull that item from the agenda.
Several Council members had expressed to the City Manager their concern over that portion of
the proposed ordianance that makes it an offense to allow"excess water to run off vegetation into
gutters or streets, regardless of the time the person is watering." Their concern seems to be the
potential compliance problems this could create for various customers, including commercial
operations and municipal operations.
The Council would like to have the Advisory Committee take another look at the proposed
ordinance.
Proposed Ordinance Raising the Condition I Trigger Level to 40%
The Council did approve this proposed ordinance on first reading. However, there was some
discussion of one of the provisions contained in Condition I. Measure#6 of Condition I provides:
6. City Council declares drought condition exists and implements water conservation
and rationing plan.
Council member Martin was concerned that the wording,particularly the term"rationing"is too
severe to describe the generally voluntary compliance measures contained in Condition I.
The City Manager responded that the ordinance could be amended prior to second reading to
address these concerns, and that the Advisory Committee might want to look at all the measures
in Condition I at the next meeting since it would be going into effect immediately if approved at
the second reading on April 9, 1996.
Water Conservation Advisory Committee
March 27, 1996
Page two
I believe the Council will move forward on these two items with the Advisory Committee's input.
These two issues will be back on the committee agenda for the meeting on April 3, 1996.
I look forward to seeing you then.
z / 4%24- c>42—e/o-Pi"--
ames A. Dodson
attachments
1 of TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: James Dodson, Regional Water Director
C OCorpus
DATE: March 22, 1996
Chi'isti RE: An Ordinance Prohibiting Watering of Vegetation at
Certain Times
BACKGROUND
The wise and effective use of the limited freshwater resources available to this region is of utmost
importance to the public health, safety, and welfare. At any time,whether the reservoirs are full
or not,water should be used in the most efficient maser possible. Water conservation
techniques are designed to increase water use efficiency,prevent the waste of water and generally
decrease the overall demand for water.
One of the water conservation techniques that has been considered for many areas of the country
that have high evaporation rates is prohibiting the watering of vegetation during the peak
evaporative hours. Decreasing evaporative losses means that less water can be used to achieve
the same benefits. Studies have shown that as much as a 60%increase inefficiency can result.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
The attached ordinance is largely the result of the work of the Mayor's Water Advisory
Committee, Subcommittee on Water Conservation, and has been recommended in its final form
by the newly established Water Conservation Advisory Commitee. The ordinance would amend
Chapter 55,Article VI of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances to add a new Section 55-96 that
would prohibit the watering of vegetation,by any means, during the period from 10:00 a.m. and
6:00 p.m., year-round. It would also make it a violation to allow excess water to run off
vegetation into gutters or streets at any time. The ordinance provides for several exceptions, so
that it would not be a violation if
•
(1) the water did not come from the City's potable water distribution system;
(2) the water was used in the operation of a commercial nursery;
(3) the water was used on newly planted or transplanted vegetation, for a period up to
15 days after the vegetation was planted or transplanted, providing that it was
applied by hand held hose, drip irrigation system or an attended or automatic
sprinkler system; and
(4) the water was used in testing an underground irrigation system during installation,
maintenance or repair.
127
Penalties for violation are a Class C misdemeanor. However,the first and second violation would
be handled by issuing a warning and providing the offender with informational material to educate
them on proper watering techniques. Only on the third and subsequent offenses would a citation
be issued.
ffpRM s TION AND EDUCATIQL
depend efficacy of the ordinance will primarily
d end on the concurrent enactment of an intensive
information and education program designed to provide the public with a clear understanding of
efficient watering techniques. Much of the problem that currently exists can be attributed to a
lack of understanding of the water needs of turf and garden vegetation. Information needs to be
provided that is specific to the soiland climate conditions of this region. In addition to watering
during periods of high evaporation, many water users tend to water too frequently, and without
proper consideration of the antecedent soil moisture levels.
The primary goal of the proposed ordinance is to increase public efficient use of our ss of proper
wawatering
techniques, and,in turn,to gradually change behavior to more
er
resources. It is not a short-term measure designed to drastically reduce water demand during
periods of water shortage,but rather,when combined with a targeted information program,is a
long-term measure designed to encourage overall water conservation and permanent reductions in
per capita water use.
One of the additonal benefits of the proposed ordinance is shifting the main component of
outdoor water use to off-peak hours for the
ter distribution
implemented similar ordinances have reported significantreductions in peak-hour demands,thus
reducing system operating expenses and,potentially, deferring the need for capital intensive
system capacity expansions to meet peak-hour demands.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Water Conservation Advisory
Committee.
J A. Dodson
attachment
128
•
AN ORDINANCE •
•
PROHIBITING WATERING OF VEGETATION AT CERTAIN
TIMES; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE.
WHEREAS, Corpus Christi is located in a semi-arid region where water sources must be
prudently conserved to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 55,Article VI of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances is amended
by adding a new Section 55-96 to read as follows:
Sec. 55-96. Watering of vegetation prohibited at certain times.
(a) Definitions. As used in this section the following terms have the following
meanings:
(1) "Vegetation" means plant material, including but not limited to, lawns,
grasses, weeds, green spaces, trees, shrubbery, gardens, vegetables, fruits,
flowers,and vines.
(2) "Drip irrigation system"means a water saving irrigation system designed and
actually functioning to release water only on a very slow basis. (Among
others, it excludes any spraying of water into the air.)
(3) "Hand held hose" means only a hose being physically held by a person in
hand and equipped with a positive shutoff nozzle;
(4) "Attended or automatic sprinkler system" means a sprinkler system which is
physically attended outside by a person throughout the entire time it is being
used or which is equipped with an automatic shutoff.
(5) "Excess water" means water which is moving in a recognizable stream from
the area being watered into the street or gutter.
•
(b) Offenses. A person commits an offense if:
ag5000.548vr March 22, 1996(11:36am)
129
(1) the person waters vegetation outdoors between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
6:00 p.m.;
(2) the person allows excess water to run off vegetation into gutters or streets,
regardless of the time the person is watering.
(c) Defense to prosecution. It shall be a defense to prosecution under section(b)(1)that:
(1) theperson used water which did not come directly from the city's potable
waterworks distribution system;
(2) the person used water in the operation of a commercial nursery;
(3) the person used water on newly planted or transplanted vegetation, and used
either a hand held hose,a drip irrigation system, or an attended or automatic
sprinkler system, for up to 15 days after the vegetation was planted or
transplanted;
(4) the person was testing an underground irrigation system during installation,
maintenance, or repair of the underground irrigation system.
SECTION 2. A violation of Section 55-96 is subject to the penalty in Section 1-6 of the
City Code.
SECTION 3. The City Secretary shall cause publication of this ordinance in compliance
with the City Charter.
subdivision, clause,phrase, or
SECTION 4. If for any reason any section,paragraph, ud ent of a court word of
provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment
dgm clause,tofaphrase,
competent jurisdiction,it shall not affect any other section,paragraph,
word or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose.
March 22. 1996(11:36am)
ag5000.548vr
130
1ity of
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: James Dodson, Regional Water Director
Corpus
DATE: March 22, 1996
ChflStiRE: Ordinance to Amend the 1987 Water Conservation and
•
Drought Contingency Plan to Raise the Condition I
Trigger Level
JACKGROUND
The last severe drought experienced in this area, which resulted in the rationing of water for
residential use in the summer of 1984, gave rise to a planning effort that culminated in a
comprehensive`Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan" dated September, 1986,
that was adopted by City Council(Ord. No. 19637) on February 17, 1987. The preface of the
plan states that it is anticipated that the plan would be "regularly updated as water supply
technology changes."
The drought contingency portion of the plan describes the four different stages of action that
would be implemented as a water shortage in the Choke Canyon/Lake Corpus Christi Reservoir
System becomes more severe. Drought, in this plan, is defined by the criteria of reservoir storage
conditions, with each stage, or"Condition"of the plan being tied to a certain"trigger level"of
system storage. The first trigger level,where Condition I would be enacted, was set to be
approximately 28% of the total reservoir system capacity, or about 260,000 acre-feet of water in
storage. This was thought to be a two-year supply for the region at the annual demand levels for
that time.
Condition I measures are primarily designed to promote voluntary reductions in water use. The
strategy is to provide information, education and assistance for system customers so that everyone
is aware of the possibility of a water shortage, and to begin making preparations for later
conditions should the situation continue to worsen. The first water use restriction that would be
implemented under Condition I is that the mimcipal operations of the City are placed on
mandatory water conseration. The City may also implement "odd-even"lawn watering, where a
customer with an odd number street address may only water vegetation on odd number days and
customers with even number street addresses may water only on even number days, as designated
by the City Manager.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO DROUGUT CONTINGENCY PLAN
The existing trigger level of 28%for enacting Condition I was originally designed to provide that
this area would have sufficient water supplies in storage to meet the region's demands through an
extended period of drought. The 28%level corresponds to approximately 260,000 acre-feet of _
131
•
water in storage. Under the reservoir system operating policies in effect at that time, and the
ter demands of that period,this may have been adequate. However,recent experience shows
waterg the 10-month
that the reservoir system storage decreased over 200,000 260,000 act acr�feet do snot appear to be period
from May, 1995 Through February, 1996. Thus, endable water supply through a
sufficient to provide a reasonable level of assurance for a dep
severe drought.
and attempts to prevent the water supply from
In order to provide that the region acts early, level for Condition I be
increased to a higher
reaching more critical levels,it has been proposed that the triggercreated Water
percentage of sytem storage capacity. The newly
Conservatione
Advisory Committee met on March 20, 1996 and voted to recommend 373,000h
capacity. This would be approximately
Condition I trigger level be set at 40% of system � or 38.1%
acre-feet of water in storage. As of this date,the reservoir storage is 355,661 acre-feet,
of system capacity.
The attached ordinance would amend Section 55-156 of the City Code of Ordinances to
utthat
e a new language for the existing language under Section 2.1
of Condition I be Conservation
ervatienacten
andsubD
and Drought Contingency Plan. This new language would provide
•
when
"combined water stored in the reservoirs is estimated to be 40% of total storage capacity."
RECOMAIMATIMI
Approval of the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Water Conservation Advisory
Committee.
-
L.
J. ,a• Dodson
attachment
•
132
ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 55, UTILITIES,
ARTICLE XII, WATER CONSERVATION, SECTION 55-156, WATER
CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 19637 on February 17, 1987,
adopting,the Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan for Corpus Christi; and,
WHEREAS, analysis of actuAl water use since the Plan was adopted indicates that the Plan
should be amended to establish the trigger point for condition I - Drought Possibility at a water
storage level of 40% of the capacity of Choke Canyon Reservoir and Lake Corpus Christi;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 55, Utilities, Article XII, Water
Conservation, Section 55-156, Water conservation and-drought contingency plan, is hereby
amended by amending section 2.1, Drought Situation Water Conservation and Rationing Plan
Summary through Condition I - Drought Possibility, on pages 55 and 56, to read as follows:
2.1 DROUGHT SITUATION WATER CONSERVATION AND RATIONING PLAN
SUMMARY •
The following steps will be taken starting when the combined water supply in Lake Corpus Christi
and Choke Canyon reservoirs reach a level where water in storage is 40% or less of total storage
capacity. The plan proposes to meet a drought situation through a series of water conservation
and rationing steps supplemented by increasing supply through alternative water sources.
CONDITION I - DROUGHT POSSIBILITY
Combined water stored in the reservoirs is estimated to be 40% of total storage capacity.
1. Daily monitoring of lake levels - Water Division.
2. Check operation of city-owned or leased wells for mechanical or electrical problems.
Determine that wells are operable. Put wells in service when needed, to maintain supply -
Water Division.
3. Discuss water conservation and rationing possibility with City's wholesale customers
including San Patricio Municipal Water District. Alice Water Authority. City of Mathis.
and Beeville Water Authority - Water Division.
H:vRB5000.887.vr
- 133
•
•
Discuss water conservation and rationing possibility with other holders of Nueces River
-- �,
water rights not controlled by the City such as Nueces River Water Control and
Improvement District No. 3 (Robstown). Notify Nueces River Authority of all actions
being taken - Water Division.
possibility Discuss of a water conservation and rationing program with large water volume
industrial users - Water Division.
6. •.City Council declares drought condition exists and implements water conservation and
rationing plan.
conservation of water by all.users. Mandatory conservation by
7. Request voluntary
municipal operations. Odd/even address yard watering -Water Division.
8. Investigate alternative water sources -Water Division:
a. Inventory existing and shut-in wells.
b. Use of wastewater plant effluent.
c. Cloud seeding.
d. Importation.
e. Desalination.
f. Other.
9. Water leak reduction program, leak repairs have highest priority - Water Division."
•
H:URB5000.887.vr
•
134
Members of the Water Conservation Advisory Committee
1. Richard Gonzalez(Residential)
Res: 3 802 Stirman
Corpus Christi, TX 78411
512/855-2525
512/8557170 Fax
2. John McHugh(Residential)
Res: 6101 Choctaw Drive
Corpus Christi, TX 784.15
512/855-5598
3. Jerry Kane (Commercial)
Res: 35 Hewitt Drive, 78404
512/888-4990
Bus: President, Sam Kane Meat Processing, Inc.
P. O. Box 9254, 78469
241-5000 _
4. Allen Schoen(Industrial Customer)
Res: 387-3372
Bus: Environmental Engineer
Valero Refinery
P O. Box 9370 78469-9370
512/289-3285
5. Richard Garza (Municipal Raw Water)
Bus: Director of Public Utilities
City of Alice
P. O. Box 3229
Alice, TX 78333-3229
512/668-7270
6. Dr. Russ Miget(Treated Water)
Bus: Texas A&M University
Department of Wildlife &Fisheries Sciences
TAMU-CC Campus Box 32
6300 Ocean Drive, 78412
994-8426
7. Billy Dick(Treated Water)
Bus: Director of Public Works
City of Rockport
P. O. Box 1059
Rockport, TX 78381
512/790-1160
•
8. Carola Serrato (South Texas Water Authority)
Bus: Executive Director
South Texas Water Authority
P. O. Box 1701
Kingsville, TX 78363
512/881-8651
9. James Naismith(San Patricio Municipal Water District)
Res: 1345 Bayview
Portland, TX 78374
Bus: General Manager
San Patricio Municipal Water District
P. O. Drawer S
Ingleside, TX 78362
512/643-6521
10. Gene Dressen(San Patricio Municipal District)
Res: 221 Blanco _
Portland, TX 78374
512/643-2104
11. Capt. Tony Alejandro (Port of Corpus Christi Authority)
Res: 7509 Thundersee, 78413
850-9415 (H)
Bus: 882-5633 (W)
12. Mark Smith(Corpus Christi Board of Trade)
Bus: Citgo Petroleum Corporation
P. O. Box 9176, 78469
844-5726
13. Dan Davis(Corpus Christi Independent School District)
Bus: Administrative Officer of Site Maintenance
66630 Range
Corpus Christi, TX 78415
878-1464
14. Eugene C. Urban(Greater Corpus Christi Alliance)
Bus: Urban Engineering
P. O. Box 6355
Corpus Christi, TX 78466-6355
854-3101
15. Terry Boone(Military)
Res: 13814 Jolly Roger, 78419
949-0205
Bus: Director of Environmental Compliance
Naval Air Station •
11001 D Street, Suite 143
Corpus Christi, TX 78419-5021
512/939-3776
512/939-3798
16. Chuck Bird(Military)
Res: 7713 Caribou Drive, 78414
993-0356
Bus: Industrial Hygenist
Corpus Christi Army Depot
Attn: S1OCCIR Se MS23, 308 Crecy Street
Corpus Christi, TX 78419-5260
939-3200
17. Jim Parker(Landscaping/Nursery)
Bus/Res: Parker Landscaping
7118 Pharoah
Corpus Christi, TX 78412
512/991-8399
18. Richard Hessee, Sr. (Home Builders Association)
Bus: Impression Homes
14225 S. Padre Island Drive, Sutie 251
Corpus Christi, TX 78418
949-9989
19. James Gill(Landscaping/Nursery)
Bus: Gills Nursery
2810 Airline Road
Corpus Christi, TX 78414
992-9674
20. Herman Johnson(Landscape/Nursery)
Bus: Turf&Irrgation
933 Airline
Corpus Christi, TX 78412
992-4914
21. Caralee Dibble(Apartment Association)
Bus: Corpus Christi Apartment Association
1010 Cairo
Corpus Christi 78412
993-7500
22. Dale Nelson(Local Media)
Res: 5302 Hunt Circle,
Corpus Christi, TX 78413
994-8118
Bus: KRIS-TV Channel 6
Meteriologist
P. 0 Box 840
Corpus Christi, TX 78403
23.' Dr. David McNichols(Council Representative)
Bus: City Council Member
P. O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, TX 78469
880-3105
24. Mickey Garza(At Large)
Bus: Water Program Manager
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
4410 Dillon Lane _
Corpus Christi, TX 78415
851-8484
25. Bob Johnannson(At Large)
Bus: President-Nueces River Authority
City of Three Rivers
P.O. Box 398
Three Rivers, TX 78071
512/786-2528
26. Darlene Locke(Landscaping/Nursery)
Bus: Nueces County Extension Service
Horticulturalist
710 E. Main Street
Robstown, TX 78380
767-5217
27. Douglas Matthews(At Large)
Res: 201 Ocean View Place
Corpus Christi, TX 78411
512/852-3044
28. Don King(Industrial)
Res: 4418 Hickey
Corpus Christi, TX 78413
851-0157
29. Ray Allen(At Large)
Bus: Central Power and Light
P. O. Box 2121
Corpus Christi, TX 78403
30. Bill Antonette (Commercial)
Bus: Nolans Plumbing
Sales Manager
5422 Ayers
Corpus Christi, TX 78415
855-5449
31. Ford Patton(Munipal Raw Water)
Bus: City of Beeville
City Manager
100 W. Corpus Christi Street
Beeville, TX 78102
512/358-4641
512/358-7355 Fax
32. W. T. Young(Commercial)
Bus: W. T. Young Co.
8347 Up River Road
Corpus Christi, TX 78409
241-2882