Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Watershore And Beach Advisory Committee - 03/01/2001 Minutes Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Thursday, March 1, 2001 Members Present: Frank Beck, Alan Dinn (Chairman) (1), Dr. Oscar Garcia, Dr. Joseph Horvat, Steven Moody (Vice Chairman), Dr. JoAnna Mott, Terri Nicolau (1), Roy Pell and Richard Poremba Staff Present: Marco A. Cisneros, Director of Park & Recreation; David Ondrias, Assistant Director for Operations; Peter M. Davidson, Marina Superintendent; Rene Garza, Marina Maintenance Technician; Benita Brunner, Management Aide; Bill Murch, Carl Miniex and Mark Smith, Senior Marina Specialists; and Frank Guerra, Marina Maintenance Foreman Call to Order: Following the Pledge of Allegiance, Chairman Dinn called the regular meeting of the Water/Shore Advisory Committee to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Bay Yacht Club, Lawrence Street T-Head. Action on Minutes: The motion was made by Mr. Beck, seconded by Dr. Horvat, to amend the one-line section on the first page of the February 21, 2001 Minutes to reflect the lengthy discussion involving the public and Committee members over the fact that the Committee was given the budget with a due date two days later and no one from the Park & Recreation Department was present that could discuss the budget. The motion passed unanimously. [Mr. Poremba entered the meeting.] The motion was made by Mr. Beck, seconded by Dr. Horvat, to approve the January 4, 2001 and February 2, 2001 Minutes as amended. The motion passed unanimously. Presentations and/or Public Comment: Dick Frenzel representing Barney's Place commented that they responded to the Request for Proposals for the fuel lease. He indicated their plans, in addition to operating a safe, quality fuel station may include a casual restaurant, Seatow-type operation, sewage boat and opportunities for boater education. He reported Danny Duzich is negotiating with City Staff regarding the building design (two-story, stilted, 2,000 square foot building possibly with a deck surround) and lease and that, once the lease is signed, they can be operational within three weeks. In response to concerns regarding whether the building design fit into the overall planning and if the lease would come back before the Committee, Mr. Davidson reported that at the February 2001 meeting the Committee had appointed Chairman Dinn to serve on the RFP selection committee due to short timelines regarding the lease; that Mr. Duzich submitted the only response to the RFP that was sent to/received by 134 businesses. Chairman Dinn reported that the concept was to keep things as broad as possible in order to attract a knowledgeable operator that would do fuel along with another operation and that Mr. Duzich's response included a small restaurant along with the required fueling operation. Dr. Horvat commented that he was not against the concept but felt the Committee should have received that information prior to rather than at a public meeting. Mr. Frenzel responded to Dr. Horvat that they were aware of and SCANNED Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Ivlinutes -1- March 1, 2001 A • would be willing to making soy-based fuel sales available if there was a market. Mr. Davidson reported that the intent was that the old fuel station was to be removed and the new facility to be operational by the end of April 2001 and that there should not be any interruption in fuel services. He responded to questioning that City Staff is discussing plans for the relocation of the sanitary pump out facility to the new fuel location. He added that the fuel station would be located toward the northeast corner of the L-Head. Mr. Cisneros reported that the rental requirement will include payment of a monthly flat rent or a percentage, whichever is greater. Public Comment and/or Presentations: Chairman Dinn thanked the Bay Yacht Club for hosting the meeting and encouraged those in present to attend the regularly scheduled meetings held at City Hall. Andy Ficken commented that slip rates should not be increased but if they are, it should be equal regardless of pier or pleasure/commercial vessel; that if rates increase, Parks will find a way to take money from the Marina; that the Marina should be allowed to run as a marina with Marina Staff/funds going toward Marina duties (lights out); that the Parks Department should perform park responsibilities (Seawall, Miradores, etc.); and that dredging will have to be addressed as a bond issue. Dick Leonard commented that the personnel salaries and benefits ($476,000) was a lot of overhead for the boat owners/slip renters to carry given the fact that boats leave faster and debts continue to increase; that eventually the debts would have to be carried by a few boats; that Marina should not continue encumbering big debts given the diminishing number of tenants; that maintenance costs, for non-Marina related projects, put the costs well over $500,000; and that tenants, as the Marina's income source, should be treated more politely instead of as has been complained about on numerous occasions, as if they are doing wrong and are being policed/watched so Staff can catch them doing wrong. Ralph Bowen commented that it is not fair that tenants subsidize the public's use of the Marina i.e. putting boats in the water (boat ramps), fisherman and those who use the facilities and thrown trash around; that the burden is placed on the tenants when rates are increased for which they get nothing in return; and that the City owes tenants respect because they are paying for their use of the facility. Nela Wilems commented that Mr. Cisneros'/Mr.. Ondrias' absence at the last meeting was acutely noted; that she had asked several City Councilpersons to attend the meeting; that it is important that the Committee and other City representatives listen to those who actually utilize the Marina and those who have used facilities at other marinas; that she had serious problems with the budget i.e. the huge increase in computer costs that should not be borne solely by tenants; that tenants should not have to pay for maintaining the Miradores/benches; that she appreciated the Marina Staff and the kindness and consideration they have extended to her; that the City got ripped off regarding costs associated with the bait stand and that something needs to be renegotiated so that tenants do not have to pay for the facility; that boater facilities in other marinas have a library, Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -2- March 1, 2001 computer access/hookup and a television; that tenants pay their share of what the Marina charges them but they never see the City giving back monies for the work the Marina Staff is doing for the City (Marina is not compensated for costs associated with Marina Staff picking up trash following community events); that slip increases cause desertion so there is less money taken in; that vacant slips needs to be advertised to attract boaters; that the five-day stay aboard needs to be negotiable in order to attract visiting boaters; and that cruisers do not consider Corpus Christi a boater friendly community. Cindy Johnson commented that because they were aware and were very careful about dates, they stayed with local relatives in order to comply with staying aboard limitations; that due to be hounded by security, they felt they were not supposed to be on their boat; that security would not answer who/when someone had been onboard their boat when they left the State; that they were accused of being onboard when they were out of the State; that Port Aransas is a real Marina where live aboard provide security because they question those with whom they are unfamiliar; that ordinances can easily be revised to address environmental issues (i.e. USCG Auxiliary annual inspection, locking off y- valves, meeting IRS standards for residence); and that in their travel, they had never run across a marina that required onboard permits or treated visitors as does Corpus Christi. Martha Respondek commented that the boating community is generous and helpful with directing the volumes of tourists who visit the Marina; that the Marina/City Council should consider that the Marina is the front door to the City and that the City should be putting money into and not taking money away from the Marina so that it can be properly maintained so that it looks nice and pristine for the tourists. Jerry Vaughn commented that adequate parking should be considered for the L-Head restaurant; regarding his opposition to tenants paying for repairs to the barge dock/boat ramps and for cleaning the waterfront/Seawall which should be a General Fund responsibility; that history proves that rate increases result in loss of tenants; that he questioned why tenants should decorate/participate in community events as they are encouraged to do when the City turns around and dumps on them; that City Staff from Mr. Davidson down are helpful but he is convinced that those over Mr. Davidson do not care whether or not there are Marina tenants; that the City does not seem to appreciate the beauty of the Marina; that he resents tenants having to subsidize the bait stand which has not paid rent for over a year; and inquired about the water quality since the live aboards have departed. Bob Dawson commented that his boat would not have been stolen from just in front of the Marina Office if there were live aboards looking at what's going on and if thieves were not aware that Marina personnel go home for the night. Jane Stubbs commented that she has paid rent to the Marina for 17 years; that she owns commercial shrimp boats and works with shrimpers but is not herself a shrimper; that her contract stated that she would start paying rent when the new facility was completed; that she was forced to move into the new facility before it was completed; that when she tried Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -3- March 1, 2001 to have the electricity work done so the live wells would be operational, City Staff contacted the electricians from whom she had received bids, advising they could not do the work because it was the City's responsibility; that 10,000 bait stand customers signed a petition in one week because they knew what the City was doing (forcing the fuel on her) was unfair; that she would be happy to answer further questions regarding the matter; that when there is a problem in the Marina, someone should be responsible just like it's her responsibility for what occurs at the bait stand regardless of whether or not she is there; that she feels things are made hard and it is ridiculous that she is required to put requests for information/service in writing; and that it is not pleasant to deal with the Marina anymore. Ms. Stubbs responded to Mr. Beck that as of January 26, 2001, when the electricity was completed she is satisfied that the City has completed their contract; and that she will be submitting a check for her first month's business by March 10, 2001. Judge Robert Blackmon commented that Ms. Stubbs owns the only local fleet that slows/stops for small boats; regarding the Sea Scout programs/boats/participation within the Marina; and that a slip increase will result in removal of Sea Scouts boats. Paul Earls commented that the Marina has the sorriest reputation of any along the Texas coast; that the overall attitude of the Marina is what detracts from everything; that he witnessed one late afternoon, an individual being threatened with arrest for lack of an overnight permit; that he would like to see a change in the requirement, found only in this Marina, to pay $200 per year for the right to be in business freely in the Marina with no relief on the insurance (naming the City additional insured) or property taxes; that the City should be satisfied with the sales tax he pays; and that he feels the $200 fee is in the same category as the unnecessary rules put upon those who want to live aboard. Discussion Items: Increasing Slip Occupancy - Mr. Davidson commented that marketing strategies include discussions with Susan Cable of City Communications, using a marketer ($75/hour), utilizing the website (corpuschristimarina.com, which is linked to marinas.com and the Marina Association of Texas website), advertising in the Texas Cruising Guides and investigating attending boat shows in the upcoming year. Mr. Davidson reported that there is only a small Staff responsible for dealing with numerous areas of responsibility i.e. live aboards that does not leave adequate time for marketing. He reported the Marina Staff works 24/7/365 and is comprised of eighteen positions (Administration: one Marina Superintendent, one Maintenance Mechanic (acting supervisor), one Management Aide, and two, part-time Office Aides; Operations/Maintenance: one Maintenance Foreman, two Marina Specialist Is (night guard), three Marina Specialist IIs (maintenance), three Marina Specialist Ills (boater assistance/maintenance) and three Senior Marina Specialists (day-time security/SARs). Installation of Additional Electrical Meters - Mr. Davidson reported the Marina is currently spending $55,000 per year on electricity and that with the CP&L take over the upcoming 20% fuel surcharge will increase the cost to $66,277 per year. An investigation Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -4- March 1, 2001 revealed two ways to accomplish meter installation in the 294 wet slips that are not currently metered (102 are currently metered). The first remedy would be for Marina Staff to build the support stanchions (if the pier will support that) and then to hire an electrician to install the meters. Materials, labor, fasteners, wiring and an electrician would cost approximately$104,000 or $354.37 per meter. The second remedy would be to purchase fiberglass stanchion digital meters (access for two boats including a dock light and hose bib and are telephone and cable television ready) and hire an electrician to install the meters. Materials, labor, fasteners and an electrician would cost approximately $141,804 or $482 per meter. He reported the Texas Senate is currently considering a Bill that will affect all Texas marinas and require that Marinas not charge more than that for which the utility company bills them. The Marina does not currently profit on electricity but the Bill does not consider nor allow for collection for wear and tear or maintenance of the electrical equipment and the Marina replaces approximately thirty electrical meters each year. Mr. Davidson indicated that he did not believe it would benefit the Marina to install meters at this time and most especially until the outcome and the impact of the Bill is known. Mr. Davidson responded to questioning: that the Marina charges a monthly utility recovery fee (covering garbage, water, power) to tenant vessels according to the vessel length ($3.75, $6.87, $13.12 and $23.75) and requests the City Electrician to install meters in non-metered slips when electrical use is determined to be excessive (air conditioning, etc.); that charges from CP&L and the Public Utilities divided by occupied slips indicate expenditures equate to what is collected from the monthly utility recovery charge; that 280KWH is credited toward the monthly utility recovery base charge for non- commercial, metered use of electricity and usage above 280KWH is charged at $0.12 per KWH; that he could not answer (hypothetically) whether or not the current billing practice goes against the proposed Bill; that the utility recovery rate currently balances out with utility expenditures (garbage, water, power) but that will not be the case with the projected $11,000 increase in electrical charges for next year; that there is a CP&L meter indicating electrical use on each pier; Mr. Garza responded to questioning that a 30amp, in-line meter costs approximately$375 and the 50amp, in-line meter costs approximately $500 without installation and that the meters go bad and do not last very long which is still a high cost per slip. Mr. Beck commented that the Marina is somewhat ahead given electric bills run between $2,800 and $3,000 per month and the amount collected, based on boat length, is approximately $3,700 per month from which garbage and water are required to be paid from the amount collected. Mr. Davidson commented that he would like to install more meters but given the upcoming boating events (Optimists World Championships, J-22 Championships, etc.) restrooms and other issues need to be addressed before meter installation. Mr. Beck commented he felt the Marina is suffering a monthly loss for lack of metering. Mr. Davidson reported that the problem is not just installing meters but how to do it and make it viable. He reported problems with the wooden stanchions on Piers A, B, C and D (floating) that due to their weight are causing the piers to be lopsided and commented that fiberglass meters which are lighter will allow the piers to float as intended. Mr. Davidson Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -5- March 1,2001 commented that he would prefer to spend time advertising the vacant boat slips that could bring in an estimated $140,000 per year and then reconsider the meter situation. Dredging - Mr. Davidson indicated that he has been discussing options with the Port Authority and City Engineers; that Staff is waiting for the underwater map being prepared by the Corps of Engineers; that the top soil is good and possibly could be used to replenish area beaches but that soil sample tests would be required for what is beneath the top soil; that mobilization fees for a dredge could be as much as $60,000 so he is looking into piggybacking the gap dredging onto a Port Authority project; that Island Moorings owns their own dredge and were willing to lease it to the Marina based on a per hour charge (pending); that the USCG installed an extra buoy and performed readings at the gap; that City Engineering indicated he could revisit the issue when funds were available to perform the work; that the issue should be resolved within the next few months. Mr. Beck encouraged Mr. Davidson to get a yardage guarantee related to the hourly charge suggested by Island Moorings. Mr. Cisneros responded to questioning that the short-term concern is dredging only the gap and the long-term is dredging overall; that anything over $50,000 would have to come from the General Fund or be addressed through a bond fund program because the large scale projects can not be supported by the Marina Fund; that dredging was included in the $44,000,000 Bond 2000 Program for the Park & Recreation Department and City Council reduced that to $4,500,000 for all projects; that the Port is a separate entity from City of Corpus Christi and frequently provides cursory assistance but has no obligation to fund Marina projects. Mr. Moody commented that a Marina Office, dredging, bulk heading and wiring are needed in the Marina, the City's front door, and that the City offered little assistance, unless something major went wrong, to maintain the infrastructure and facilities. Mr. Cisneros commented that some bulk heading would be addressed in the Seawall project and that Staff is attempting to increase other changes for the Marina related to bulkhead-type detailing if that will result in a cost savings. Mr. Moody wondered if the City was aware of the Marina's needs with regarding to upcoming City events. Mr. Cisneros responded that moving forward with the Seawall and Bond 2000 Projects and educating the City Council on the importance to address dredging and structure needs in the next bond program. Mr. Cisneros responded to Mr. Beck that the Seawall project address filling the voids in the under structure; that the concrete cover does not change; there is a possibility that ADA access to t-heads/l-head would have to be addressed in some manner; that the bearing capability of spoil materials proposed to be dredged from the Marina. Mr. Davidson responded to questioning that he is waiting for the dredging study performed five years ago by Shiner Moseley. Mr. Cisneros reported that the Marina has not been fully dredged since it was built; that Stormwater carries some responsibility with regard to their outfalls carrying sediment into the Marina. Mr. Davidson commented that the water surge resulting from tankers accessing the Port also affects the Marina and eroding the Seawall. Mr. Beck commented there should be a way to work out a user fee to the Port since each ship/barge goes through the Marina. Discussion followed regarding the concept of a user fee to the Port. Director's Report - Mr. Davidson and/or Mr. Cisneros responded to questioning that sanitary pollution incidents indicated in the report had occurred approximately one year Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -6- March 1,2001 before and that Staff reported the incidents to the USCG and sent a letter informing the offender of the problem which has not been reported; that the Health Department does not currently take samples within the Marina; that the Health Department did not provide a report prior to the meeting; that the R-Pier gate was replaced entirely and a marine-related scene will be painted on the entrance; that the Seafood Market (Draft #9 and #10) issue is going back before the Health Advisory Committee at that Committee Chairman's request; that the Water/Shore Committee Chairman will make the Seafood Market presentation to the City Council; that a debt service is set up to pay for expenses (coasted out since 1985) related to bulkhead and major repairs and-of the approximately $600,000 debt service, the Marina Fund pays around $50,000 and the balance is paid out of the General Fund; that new bulkhead work within the Marina will be covered in the Seawall Project; that the City Council directed City Staff to desist regarding working on live aboards; that City Manager and Assistant City Manager are in New York City seeking funding for Bond 2000; that the information indicating there is no significant crime in the Marina was presented to the Committee by Commander Smith at a previous meeting; that Marina Staff encourages those who have had problems report it to the Police Department; and that the effluent report was provided in answer to questions presented to Staff previous to the meeting. Chairman Dinn commented that citizens could contact their City Councilperson regarding their support for whatever are the citizens' issues. Chairman Dinn requested that information regarding incidents that are reported to the Committee include a reference date. Dr. Mott requested that when answers to questions are included in the director's report that they be indicated as a response to provided questions and from what source. The Committee recessed at 7:52 p.m. and the meeting was resumed at 8:01 p.m. Budget - The motion was made by Dr. Horvat, seconded by Mr. Pell, to leave the slip rentals alone. . Dr. Horvat stated the Enterprise Fund is what needs to be discussed and he requested that it be a topic for discussion at the next meeting. He added that the current system can not function and that raising rates does nothing for the good of the City; it just makes poor leadership possible. Mr. Cisneros responded that a report regarding the Enterprise Fund history, with respect to the length of "this" meeting, is scheduled to be presented-for discussion at the April 2001 meeting; that solely revenues were reviewed at the last, special-called meeting and that historically, the budget process requires review of revenues, expenditures, debt service and capitol improvements yet the City budget process does not provide the complete picture either for an Enterprise or a General Fund and you can not look at revenues without know what you are trying to cover. Mr. Pell commented that was exactly the point the Committee was trying to make. Mr. Cisneros stated Staff projected the known increases i.e. increases in fuel prices, electricity, utilities, etc. but indicated last years' numbers where the allocations have yet to be determined i.e. MIS, fleet, etc.; that the debt service and construction.has taken a toll on the Marina funds which need to be replenished in case of a bond review for which a good balance (approximately $500,000) would be needed to show solvency with regard to borrowing money to do a particular job in the Marina. Dr. Horvat agreed with Mr. Cisneros' points adding that just because there is bad management in the City is no reason Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -7- March 1,2001 to increase fees without returning something; that he was tired of trying to keep the Marina afloat when the rest of the City seems bent on sinking it. Mr. Cisneros responded to questioning that the increase would result in an additional $28,000. Mr. Davidson responded to questioning that filling slips that are currently vacant would result in an additional $130-140,000. Dr. Horvat commented that in the past three years, the City has shot down each suggestion (live aboards, five-day limit on visiting vessels, etc.) the Committee made regarding increasing revenues; that private enterprise could succeed because they are not hamstrung as is the Marina. Discussion followed regarding the 2001-2001 revenues estimates; a rate increase reflected in the revenue estimates; no control over allocations; debt service (for piers built, bulkhead work, Marina improvements since 1985); debt service (approximately $51,000 per year) not being reflected in the expenditures; correcting $51,000 to $66,000 for heat, light and power; expenditures that are not reflected in the draft budget document; fund transfers (ancillary costs i.e. Human Resources, Legal) assessed to all City departments; and office rental (beginning 7/1/01) not reflected in expenditures. Mr. Beck inquired why some expenditures did not appear on the printed information and how the Committee could get the information. Mr. Davidson responded that the budget was in the draft stages and was presented for the Committee's comments. Mr. Cisneros responded that some items are not identified in the operating budget because they are taken out at the end of the year. Mr. Dinn asked if there was a way to include the information. Mr. Cisneros responded that he would check with the Finance Department. Mr. Davidson responded to Mr. Beck that the bait stand and boater facility were the facilities on which the $590,000 expenditure for buildings was spent. Mr. Cisneros added that $70,000 was the tenant's contribution and the net ($519,000) is the two buildings; that the $70,000 was reflected in the balance sheet for this years budget and probably would be done as a line item transfer at year end. Someone called for the question and the motion passed (six for; one against). Mr. Cisneros responded to questioning that the recommendation would be noted but it was too late to change revenues indicated. Mr. Davidson responded to questioning that the proposed rate increase went to the Budget Office; that the issue had been tabled and the Committee was informed that the deadline was the following Friday. Mr. Beck stated the motion was made to table the slip rate increase until and for discussion at the 3/1/01 meeting and that if it could be raised at the 3/1/01 meeting, it would; if not, it was to remain the same. Several Committee members agreed. Mr. Cisneros reported that Staff worked through the Committee recommendation. Mr. Beck asked where the recommendation came from. Mr. Vaughn asked why the Committee even exists. Mr. Beck stated the slip fee increase, as noted in the Minutes, resulted from a Committee member's inquiry and that City Staff opposed a rate increase. He asked why, when the Committee voted not to increase rates, the City proceeded with the idea. Mr. Cisneros stated that the Committee had received an overview of all revenues; that Mr. Poremba's proposal was to consider different pricing relative to slip rental; Staff considered that option as another to increase the fund balance; consideration is still the Committee's recommendation; that the budget process continues and is a work in progress until the budget is adopted at the end of June 2001. Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -8- March 1,2001 Mr. Pell commented it was deceptive for Staff to move forward a rate increase against the Committee's recommendation. Mr. Cisneros responded that Staff would work with Budget to amend and reduce the budget taking slip rates to the current rate; that the $28,000 revenue is reflected and has been put into the system. Mr. Davidson responded to questioning that a fee for use of the boat ramp has been added into the recommendations. Discussion followed regarding self-insurance expenditures relative to staffing and facilities. Mr. Davidson responded that the Marina fund balance fluctuates month-to- month depending on expenses and revenues and that interest goes into Marina funds. Mr. Beck indicated it was his understanding that the fund balance is whatever is left over at the end of the year and that it is not touched through the fiscal year of the budget process; that the Marina operates from revenue and income separate and apart from reserves. Mr. Pell, referring to allocations, expressed a business can not successfully operate without control over hands in the piggybank; that either the Enterprise Fund is allowed to operate as a business or it should be turned back over to the City to run it. Mr. Cisneros reported that Staff is required to work with the provided allocations; that allocation numbers are not available because departments benefiting from allocations are currently working on their expenditures (they have no revenue stream); Fleet expenditures are allocated across the entire City. Mr. Pell asked why an Enterprise Fund could not opt out of allocated services. Mr. Cisneros responded that the Enterprise Fund is a part of the City, first and foremost. Mr. Pell stated it was not right that the Enterprise Fund is required to generate its own revenue yet has not control over who has their hand in our piggybank. Mr. Cisneros stated allocations are assigned by department, and there is no opportunity to opt out. Discussion followed regarding how allocations have changed over the years and whether or not other City departments are paying allocations at percentages equivalent to what is paid by the Marina. Mr. Beck stated he would like to hear from a Fleet representative regarding the allocations. Mr. Davidson reported the Sailing School would not be available this year for lack of trained Staff but plans are to continue in the future. The motion was made by Mr. Beck, seconded by Mr. Garcia, to include $6,000 for Sailing School expenses. The motion passed unanimously. Discussion followed regarding expenditures i.e. minor tools (hand tools, etc.); printing (brochures-to advertising); minor computer equipment; special services (consultant); the $10,000 from Landry's to remove the fuel station will be put into the Marina fund; will not borrow money from Landry's; Marina Staff being required to purchase equipment and operate fuel station if there is an operator is not found; employee salary increase not included in budget; and forwarding allocations information to the Committee when it is received. Mr. Davidson indicated he would contact the Committee if information is received in time to call a special meeting to address the allocations; that there was a subcommittee appointed to review the allocations and there has been no report to date. Restrooms - Mr. Pell reported that there would have been no problem qualifying for CDBG funds to renovate an existing facility, but the project was determined ineligible to receive funds to build a new facility. Mr. Beck stated that Landry's has total lease assignment from the Lighthouse, and they are required to provide those facilities. Mr. Davidson responded that the Legal Depai tnient is reviewing the matter but has not answered to his satisfaction. Mr. Beck commented that Mr. Bray needs to be encouraged Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -9- March 1,2001 to strengthen the lease assignment; that if they do not perform per the lease, they should pay more since the City is compelled to provide those services. Mr. Dinn requested that whomever is in charge respond to the Committee regarding lease negotiations. Marina Office - Mr. Davidson reported G E Capital's offer to sell both trailers to the City for $54,000 and their agreement to apply rent paid toward the purchase price. Discussion followed regarding making G E Capital another offer; seeking other facilities; removal responsibly; purchase must be through bid process; moving into and buying one trailer; purchasing/relocating/refurbishing a barge ($430,000 for 8,000SF) which could be removed for hurricanes and resold; option to build an office ($425,000 for 3,750SF); private citizen offering to purchase a barge to lease back to the City (not pursued); putting out a request for available barges; option is to opt out of one trailer, lease/purchase second trailer and relocating some Staff to Haulout Facility (safety concerns related to boat traffic in/out); and locating an office outside the Marina Complex. Committee Reports: None offered. Current Concerns: None offered. Request for Information/Agenda Items: Discussion of Enterprise Fund; five-day stay aboard permit; what is required to put flags on CP&L light poles and preliminary ideas on special event reimbursement. Confirmation: Next Meeting Date - April 5, 2001 Adjournment: As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Peter M. Davidson Marina Superintendent SCANNED Water/Shore Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -10- March 1,2001