The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet City Council - 03/16/2021City Council City of Corpus Christi Meeting Agenda - Final-revised 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 cctexas.com Council Chambers11:30 AMTuesday, March 16, 2021 Addendums may be added on Friday. Public Notice: Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary’s office (at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su inglés es limitado, habrá un intérprete inglés-español en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. This meeting may be held via videoconference call pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.127. If this meeting is held via videoconference call or other remote method of meeting, then a member of this governmental body presiding over this meeting will be physically present at the location of this meeting unless this meeting is held pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.125 due to an emergency or other public necessity pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.045. A.Mayor Paulette M. Guajardo to call the meeting to order. B.Invocation to be given by Reverend Angel Montana, Our Lady of Pilar Church. C.Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States and to the Texas Flag to be led by Trinity Chase Salazar, Elliott Grant Middle School. D.City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E.Proclamations / Commendations Page 1 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 March 16, 2021City Council Meeting Agenda - Final-revised F.PUBLIC COMMENT - AUDIENCE AND PRESENTER SOCIAL DISTANCING AND PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND PUBLIC HEARING INPUT AT PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. To reduce the chance of COVID-19 transmission, public meetings will be held in a manner intended to separate, to the maximum practical extent, audience and presenters from personal contact with members of Community, City Staff, and City Council. This meeting will be broadcast at cctexas.com/services/council meeting-agendas-minutes-video. Public testimony and public hearing input for Public Comment and all items on the agenda at public meetings of the City Council should be provided in written format and presented to the City Secretary and/or designee no later than five minutes after the start of each meeting of the City Council. Testimony and/or public input shall be in accordance with the City Secretary’s instructions, which shall be posted on the City Secretary’s door and on the City website, and allow for electronic submission. The written public testimony shall be provided to members of City Council prior to voting on measures for that meeting. Written testimony shall be limited in accordance with the City Secretary requirements and shall be placed into the record of each meeting. This testimony shall serve as the required public testimony pursuant to Texas Government Code 551.007 and shall constitute a public hearing for purposes of any public hearing requirement under law. The meeting may be held telephonically or via videoconference. The public may participate remotely by following the instructions of the City Secretary at cctexas.com/departments/city-secretary. G.CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: a.GOVERNMENT ACTIONS RELATED TO CORONA VIRUS H.MINUTES: 1.21-0291 Regular Meeting of March 2, 2021. I.BOARD & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) J.EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: K.CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 2 - 16) Consent - Second Reading Ordinances 2.20-0105 Ordinance rejecting the apparent low bid of Burnside Services, Inc. as non-responsive for lack of related experience and awarding a construction contract to Clark Pipeline Services, Corpus Christi, Texas, for the reconstruction of Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard, located in Council District 1, with new asphalt pavement and utility improvements in an amount of $5,262,457.37 with FY 2021 funding Page 2 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 March 16, 2021City Council Meeting Agenda - Final-revised available from Bond 2018, Bond 2016, Storm Water, Wastewater, Gas, and Water Funds. Sponsors:Engineering Services, Public Works/Street Department and Contracts and Procurement 3.21-0181 Ordinance authorizing a four-month service agreement with Lindamood Inc., for an amount not to exceed $212,378.00 for demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at the Corpus Christi International Airport; appropriating funds from the unreserved fund balance of the Airport Capital Reserves; and amending the budget. Sponsors:Asset Management Department, Aviation Department and Contracts and Procurement 4.21-0197 Ordinance appropriating $202,931.55 from the unreserved fund balance in the Airport Operating Fund for the purchase of parking/revenue control systems, pay-on-foot machines, booths, and canopies for Corpus Christi International Airport and amending the budget. Sponsors:Aviation Department Consent - Contracts and Procurement 5.20-1382 Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. of Oak Brook, Illinois for a total amount not to exceed $379,210.00 for promotional testing services for the Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD) through the Human Resources Department, with FY 2021 funding in an amount of $63,000.00 available through the General Fund. Sponsors:Human Resources, Police Department and Contracts and Procurement 6.20-1383 Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. of Oak Brook, Illinois, for a total amount not to exceed $409,915.00 for promotional testing services for the Corpus Christi Fire Department (CCFD) through the Human Resources Department, with FY 2021 funding in an amount of $68,000.00 available through the General Fund. Sponsors:Human Resources, Fire Department and Contracts and Procurement 7.21-0215 Motion authorizing a two-year service agreement for executive recruitment services in an amount not to exceed $294,000.00 with payment only when services are rendered with Baker Tilly US, LLP of Plano, Texas, for the recruitment of hard to fill executive-level positions to be used by City departments through the Human Resources Department, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed, FY 2021 funding is available in various funds. Sponsors:Human Resources and Contracts and Procurement 8.20-1462 Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Gulf Coast Security Enterprises LLC of New Orleans, Louisiana, in an amount not to exceed Page 3 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 March 16, 2021City Council Meeting Agenda - Final-revised $145,890.00 for Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach, with FY 2021 funding in an estimated amount of $32,420.00 available through the Utilities Department Water Fund. Sponsors:Utilities Department and Contracts and Procurement 9.21-0189 Motion authorizing the lease-purchase of one Roll Off Truck from Lonestar Freightliner Group, LLC of Waco, Texas for a total amount of $214,522.96 to be used by Solid Waste Operations, effective upon issuance of letter of acceptance with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $7,150.76 available through the General Fund. Sponsors:Solid Waste Operations and Contracts and Procurement 10.21-0217 Motion authorizing the lease-purchase of one John Deere 644P wheel loader from Doggett Heavy Machinery Services, LLC, of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total amount of $316,507.18 to be used by Solid Waste Operations, effective upon issuance of letter of acceptance with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $10,550.24 available through the General Fund. Sponsors:Solid Waste Operations and Contracts and Procurement 11.21-0191 Resolution authorizing a three-year supply agreement in an amount not to exceed $612,537.94 with TDW (US), Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the purchase of Stopple equipment parts for Gas Operations, effective upon issuance of notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding in the amount not to exceed $119,105.00 available in the Gas Fund. Sponsors:Gas Department and Contracts and Procurement 12.21-0208 Motion authorizing the purchase of four replacement Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters, and one replacement Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster to be used for the cleanup of parks and beaches from River City Marketing, Inc. (dba Corpus Christi Golf Cars) for a total amount of $78,542.85 with FY 2021 funding available through the Equipment Replacement Fund. Sponsors:Parks and Recreation Department and Contracts and Procurement 13.21-0224 Motion authorizing a five-year service agreement with Freeit Data Solutions, Inc., in an amount of $146,400.00 for uninterruptible power supplies maintenance services for the City’s Data Centers, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding available through the Information Technology fund. Sponsors:Information Technology Services and Contracts and Procurement General Consent Items 14.21-0261 Motion authorizing a one-year service agreement for Digital Marketing Campaign for the Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) with Bell Media LLC of Montgomery, Alabama for a total amount of $89,880.00, with FY 2021 funding available through the Airport Fund. Sponsors:Aviation Department Page 4 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 March 16, 2021City Council Meeting Agenda - Final-revised 15.21-0069 Resolution relating to City of Corpus Christi’s intention to reimburse itself from future issuances of Certificates of Obligation in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for expenses budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and two additional needed projects that may begin before the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation. Sponsors:Finance & Business Analysis 16.21-0188 Resolution authorizing a developer participation agreement with Southside Ventures III, LP to reimburse the developer up to $91,578 for the City’s share of the cost to construct Oso Parkway associated with a planned residential subdivision known as Cayo Del Oso Subdivision, Section 4. (District 5) Sponsors:Development Services L.RECESS FOR LUNCH M.PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEMS 17 - 22) 17.21-0060 Zoning Case No. 1120-02, Ocean Harbor II, LLC (District 4). Ordinance rezoning property at or near 14805, 14809, 14813, and 14817 Windward from the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development (Planning Commission and Staff recommend Approval) Sponsors:Development Services 18.21-0129 Zoning Case No. 1220-02, Mario A. Martinez Holdings, LLC.: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning a property at or near 14725 Running Light Drive from the “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend Approval) Sponsors:Development Services 19.21-0130 Zoning Case No. 1220-03, The Episcopal Church Corporation in West Texas: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 4518 Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District. (Planning Commission recommends Denial and Staff recommends Approval) (3/4 vote required to overturn the Planning Commission’s recommendation) Sponsors:Development Services 20.20-1344 Zoning Case No. 1020-02, Mustang Island, LLC. (District 4). Ordinance rezoning property at or near 7213 State Highway 361 from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend Approval) (3/4 vote required due to opposition by adjacent property owners) Page 5 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 March 16, 2021City Council Meeting Agenda - Final-revised Sponsors:Development Services 21.21-0254 Zoning Case No. 0221-01, Adhub, LLC.: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market Road 2292) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend Denial in lieu thereof Approval of the “IC” Industrial Compatible District with a Special Permit) (3/4 Vote required to overrule Planning Commission’s recommendation) Sponsors:Development Services 22.21-0202 Ordinance adopting the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan as an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. Sponsors:Planning & Environmental Services N.INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION ITEMS: (ITEMS 23 - 25) 23.21-0269 One-reading ordinance amending the FY 2020 - 2021 Capital Budget to include Bond 2020 Propositions A, B, and C; appropriating $75,000,000 to the Capital Budget, and amending the Capital Improvement Program by adding 42 Bond 2020 Program projects. Sponsors:Engineering Services and Office of Management and Budget 24.21-0155 Resolution authorizing the negotiation and execution of 22 professional services contracts for recommendation for Civil Engineering Services in an amount not-to-exceed $16,340,000 with nine engineering consultants for the Bond 2020 Streets projects, located Citywide, with funding available from the Streets Bond 2020 Fund. Sponsors:Engineering Services, Public Works/Street Department and Contracts and Procurement 25.21-0290 Motion awarding Amendment Number 1 to Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Corpus Christi, Texas, to provide additional preliminary design services to develop three drainage solution options for North Beach drainage [navigable canal, open channel, and closed conduit], located in Council District 1, in an amount of $123,745.00 for a total amount not to exceed $632,733.00, with FY 2021 funding available from the Storm Water Capital Fund. Sponsors:Engineering Services, Public Works/Street Department and Contracts and Procurement O.FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEM 26) 26.21-0272 Ordinance approving the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 (Downtown) Project & Financing Plans approved by the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone #3, City of Corpus Christi on January 26, 2021. Sponsors:Finance & Business Analysis P.BRIEFINGS: Page 6 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 March 16, 2021City Council Meeting Agenda - Final-revised Q.LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: R.EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 27 - 29) 27.21-0311 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning litigation including, but not limited to, the case of Martha Martinez and Nora Avila v. City of Corpus Christi, including potential consideration of settlement offers and/or fees for attorneys, engineers, other expert witnesses assisting in this case, deposition fees, and court costs, and updates on litigation in other cases. 28.21-0341 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to (1) rates, charges, claims, and ordinances related to water, wastewater, and/or gas and (2) potential legislation related to the Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County, Texas. 29.21-0345 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the purchase, exchange, and value of property south of Yorktown near Oso Creek and Oso Bay, property along La Volla Creek, property between Safety Steel Drive, Oso Creek, and a line extending south from the intersection of Yorktown and Rodd Field Road, and Texas Government Code § 551.072 to discuss and deliberate the potential purchase, exchange, and/or value of the aforementioned areas of real property . S.ADJOURNMENT Page 7 City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/15/2021 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 cctexas.com City of Corpus Christi Meeting Minutes City Council 11:30 AM Council ChambersTuesday, March 2, 2021 Addendums may be added on Friday. Mayor Paulette M. Guajardo to call the meeting to order.A. Mayor Guajardo called the meeting to order at 11:37 a.m. Invocation to be given by Very Reverend Pedro T. Elizardo, Corpus Christi Cathedral. B. Very Reverend Pedro T. Elizardo, Corpus Christi Cathedral gave the invocation. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States and to the Texas Flag to be led by Manuel Giraldo. C. Manuel Giraldo led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States and the Texas Flag. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers.D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Peter Zanoni, City Attorney Miles K. Risley and City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. Mayor Paulette M. Guajardo,Council Member Roland Barrera,Council Member Gil Hernandez,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Billy A. Lerma,Council Member John Martinez,Council Member Ben Molina,Council Member Mike Pusley, and Council Member Greg Smith Present:9 - Proclamations / CommendationsE. 1.Commendation for Roy Miller High School Football Team The commendation for Roy Miller High School had been presented that morning. PUBLIC COMMENTF. Mayor Guajardo referred to comments from the public. The following citizens called in regarding Rose Hill Cemetery and dead fish Page 1City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes clean-up on the island: John Hendricks, 622 Texas Ave.; and Ted Mandel, 15306 Key Largo Ct. The following citizens submitted written public comments regarding Item 5 which are attached to the Minutes: Julie Rogers, 710 Furman Ave.; Errol Summerlin, 1017 Diomede Dr., Portland, TX; Daniel Pena, 2813 Hulbirt St.; and Shirin Delsooz, 6030 Tapestry Dr. CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS:G. Mayor Guajardo referred to City Manager's Comments. City Manager Peter Zanoni reported on the following topics: 1) Recognition of Chief Financial Officer Constance Sanchez for her 30 years of service with the City. 2) Thanked staff, Council Member Smith, and others for their help with the dead fish clean-up on the Island canals. 3) Spring Break week - beach clean-up; COVID-19 protocols; public works monitoring traffic signals; and Vision Zero. CORPUS CHRISTI CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU ANNUAL REPORT - BRETT OETTING, CEO a. Visit Corpus Christi CEO Brett Oetting presented information on the following topics: the destination management cycle; destination management organization; creating a better community by sharing Corpus Christi with the world; optimism; learning and assessing; overall assessment; explorers; key takeaways; building and developing; to become the Gulf Coast capital for outdoor recreational and coastal experiences; leading and executing; destination marketing accreditation program; 2021 business plan key highlights; travel safety perceptions stabilize as pandemic impact increases; marketing objective; and annual power of travel in Corpus Christi. Council Members and CEO Oetting discussed the following topics: Coastal communities should have a strong summer; business will ramp up in Corpus Christi during Memorial Day weekend; the marketing campaign plan will include advertising through magazines, websites, etc.; marketing strategy will cover the entire state of Texas, with a focus on North Texas (Austin and Dallas/Fort Worth), along with other communities outside of the state e.g. (New Orleans); the focus is bringing people into our city by advertising more on outdoor activities versus indoor activities due to COVID-19; the goal is to keep all sports/venues full year-round; in the SWOT analysis in the business plan, the City's weaknesses are objectives for the community; the importance of having a tourism hotel convention center; the marketing plan is using digital media like Hulu and YouTube; a presentation form the Airport on direct flights will be scheduled within the next 30-45 days; and ensuring the City's gateways/entrances are welcoming to visitors. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS RELATED TO CORONA VIRUS: NONEb. No report was given. MINUTES:H. 2.Regular Meeting of February 23, 2021. Page 2City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Council Member Pusley, seconded by Council Member Molina that the Minutes be approved. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. BOARD & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: NONEI. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION:J. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 19)K. Consent - Second Reading Ordinances Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor Guajardo referred to the Consent Agenda. Council Members requested that Item 5 be pulled for individual consideration. A motion was made by Council Member Molina, seconded by Council Member Hernandez to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item 5. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lerma, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Molina, Council Member Pusley and Council Member Smith 9 - Abstained:0 3.Zoning Case No. 0121-02, Braselton Development Company, Ltd.: (District 5) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 7601 Yorktown Boulevard from the “FR” Farm Rural District to the “RS-4.5” Single Family 4.5 District. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend Approval) This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032367 4.Zoning Case No. 0121-03, Bassam Salman: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 725 Glenoak Drive from the “RM-1” Multifamily 1 District to the “RS-4.5” Single Family 4.5 District. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend Approval) This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032368 5.Zoning Case No. 1020-01, Tex-Isle, LLC.: (District1). Ordinance rezoning property at or near 1401 North Alameda Street from the “RM-1” Multifamily Residential District to the “IL” Light Industrial District. Planning Commission and Staff recommend Denial.(3/4 vote required due to Planning Commission's recommendation of denial) Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 5. Page 3City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes A Council Member pulled this item to restate his stance against the zoning change. Council Member Barrera made a motion to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye:Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Molina, Council Member Pusley and Council Member Smith 7 - Nay:Mayor Guajardo and Council Member Lerma2 - Abstained:0 Enactment No: 032369 6.Zoning Case No. 1220-04 Gulf Realty Trust/ Poseidon Realty/ North End Realty Trust: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 7349 and 7325 State Highway 361 from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval) (3/4 vote will be required due to opposition by surrounding property owners) This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032370 7.Ordinance amending the City’s Consolidated Annual Action Plan (CAAP) of entitlement funding from HUD for FY 2019-2020; accepting and appropriating $2,275,155.00 from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) and $1,864,176.00 for the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG-CV) funding in FY 2019-2020; authorizing the execution of all documents necessary to accept, appropriate, and disburse the funds; to execute all agreements, amendments and all other documents necessary to implement the additional CDBG-CV and ESG-CV funding from HUD with organizations for approved projects. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032371 Consent - Contracts and Procurement 8.Motion authorizing five, two-year service agreements for a combined amount not to exceed $400,000.00 for mowing and servicing properties for Code Enforcement, with an agreement with each of the following Contractors: Apostle Construction Enterprises, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas, Dexter Charles Rhines Jr., dba D.R. Lawn Maintenance of Corpus Christi, Texas, J.M. Perez and Grandsons LLC of Portland, Texas, Page 4City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes TurnKey Lawn Care & Services, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas, and Juan Carlos Valdez, dba Woodwerk Tree Trimming & Landscaping, of Corpus Christi, Texas, each in an amount not to exceed $80,000.00, with FY 2021 funding in the amount of approximately $58,333.00 available through the General Fund and $58,333.00 available through the CDBG Grants Fund for a combined amount of $116,666.00. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-035 9.Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Excel Pump & Machine, Inc. from Corpus Christi, Texas, for an amount not to exceed $840,750.00, for pump repairs at O. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant and the booster and raw water pump stations, with FY 2021 funding in an estimated amount of $163,479.00 available through the Water Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-036 10.Motion authorizing a two-year supply agreement with Neptune Technology Group Inc., of Tallassee, Alabama, for a total amount not to exceed $810,403.79, for water meters and components for the Utilities Department, with FY 2021 funding available in the amount of $405,201.90 in the FY 2021 Water Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-037 11.Motion authorizing a two-year supply agreement with EGSW, LLC, of Wimberly, Texas, for a total amount not to exceed $512,300.00, for Micro-Solve (a preventative grease and odor solution) for Wastewater Treatment Plants, with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $149,421.00 available from the FY 2021 Wastewater Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-038 12.Motion authorizing a four-year service agreement for On-call Electrical Services for City Landfills with Readyflo Systems, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total amount not to exceed $117,120.00; with FY 2021 funding in an amount of $17,080.00 in the General Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-039 13. Motion authorizing the lease-purchase of one self-loading brush truck Page 5City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes from Houston Freightliner, Inc., dba Houston Freightliner & Western Star of Houston, Texas for a total amount of $191,084.49 to be used by Solid Waste Operations, effective upon issuance of letter of acceptance with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $6,369.48 available through the General Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-040 14.Motion authorizing a two-year service agreement in an amount not to exceed $556,827.00 with Austin Traffic Signal Construction Co. Inc. of Round Rock Texas, for the purchase of roadway illumination and traffic signal maintenance services for the Public Works Department, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding in an amount of $162,400.00 available from the Streets and General Funds . This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-041 15.Resolution authorizing a three-year service agreement for mowing and grounds maintenance of Storm Water Group 4 for an estimated amount of $195,510.00 with Dorame General Repair and Lawn, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas for the Public Works Department, with FY 2021 funding in an amount not to exceed $38,015.00 available through the Storm Water Fund. This Resolution was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032372 16.Resolution authorizing a five-year service agreement with Area Electronics Systems, Inc., dba DataON, in an amount not to exceed $74,010.50 for the purchase of data storage, application servers, and warranty for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill and J.C. Elliott Collection Center, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding available through the General Fund. This Resolution was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032373 17.Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Alpha Omega Wireless, Inc. of Austin, Texas in an amount of $110,160.00 for maintenance and support of remote communication towers, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $36,720.00 available in the Information Technology Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-042 Page 6City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes 18.Resolution authorizing a five-year service agreement for a renewal with Sprout Social, Inc., in an amount of $76,500.00, for records retention, analytics/reporting, and multi-channel social media management for the Communications Department, with FY2021 funding in an amount of $15,300.00 available through the General Fund. This Resolution was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 032374 19.Motion authorizing a three-year supply agreement with Advance Stores Company Inc., dba Advance Auto Parts, in amount not to exceed $1,350,000.00, for the purchase of automotive maintenance parts, for Asset Management Department, Fleet Division, with FY2021 funding in the amount of $300,000.00 available through the Fleet Maintenance Service Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2021-043 RECESS FOR LUNCHL. The recess for lunch was held during Executive Session Item 26. PUBLIC HEARINGS:M. INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION ITEMS: (ITEM 20)N. 20.Motion authorizing the purchase of 56 LED internally illuminated street name (ILSN) signs from TRASTAR Inc., of Richardson, Texas in the amount of $73,900.00 for the Public Works Department, with FY 2021 funding available in the Streets Fund. Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 20. Director of Public Works Richard Martinez presented the following information: internally illuminated street name signs. A Council Member thanked Director Martinez and his team for their work on this item. Council Member Molina made a motion to approve the motion, seconded by Council Member Smith. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye:Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lerma, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Molina, Council Member Pusley and Council Member Smith 9 - Page 7City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes Abstained:0 Enactment No: M2021-044 FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 21 - 23)O. 21.Ordinance rejecting the apparent low bid of Burnside Services, Inc. as non-responsive for lack of related experience and awarding a construction contract to Clark Pipeline Services, Corpus Christi, Texas, for the reconstruction of Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard, located in Council District 1, with new asphalt pavement and utility improvements in an amount of $5,262,457.37 with FY 2021 funding available from Bond 2018, Bond 2016, Storm Water, Wastewater, Gas, and Water Funds. Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 21. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds stated that there are three actions being taken with this item: awarding a construction contract for a 2018 proposition A arterial road reconstruction project; rejecting low bidder as non-responsive; and aligning the funding to do the project. Council Members, Director Edmonds, City Manager Peter Zanoni, Director of Finance Heather Hurlbert, Chief Financial Officer Constance Sanchez and Director of Public Works Richard Martinez discussed the following topics: Council Members' concern with the process of hiring bidders; a Council Member's request to create a street program for bids on concrete versus asphalt; a Council Member's opinion that Leopard Street should be made of concrete because it is in a heavy industrial area; there is currently a Council policy in place for asphalt and concrete streets; a Council Member's request to pre-qualify new contractors before they prepare a bid; the three types of bonds that are required on construction projects are bid, performance and payment; the City's policy is to award to the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder; a Council Member's perception that staff decisions are being based on an opinion and not on criteria; the projects presented by the contractor with the bid were not projects that were in similar complexity or size to the project for the contract that was being awarded; the contractors have the option of attending a pre-bid conference to ask questions and provide qualifications before bidding; a Council Member's concern about moving funds from the 2016 residential streets bond for this project; a Council Member's concern that the bid difference was almost $700,000 and the accountability to use taxpayers' money appropriately; a Council Member's request for another discussion on the concrete versus asphalt policy; there are maintenance issues for both asphalt and concrete; the City seems to fall short on materials testing and inspection; and spends about one percent of construction value on materials testing. Council Member Lerma made a motion to approve this ordinance, seconded by Council Member Pusley. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Page 8City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes Aye:Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lerma, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Molina, Council Member Pusley and Council Member Smith 7 - Nay:Council Member Barrera and Council Member Hernandez2 - Abstained:0 22.Ordinance authorizing a four-month service agreement with Lindamood Inc., for an amount not to exceed $212,378.00 for demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at the Corpus Christi International Airport; appropriating funds from the unreserved fund balance of the Airport Capital Reserves; and amending the budget. Mayor Guajardo referred to Items 22-23. There were no comments from the Council. Council Member Pusley made a motion to approve Items 22-23, seconded by Council Member Molina. These Ordinances were passed on first reading with one vote and approved with the following vote: Aye:Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Lerma, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Molina, Council Member Pusley and Council Member Smith 9 - Abstained:0 23.Ordinance appropriating $202,931.55 from the unreserved fund balance in the Airport Operating Fund for the purchase of parking/revenue control systems, pay-on-foot machines, booths, and canopies for Corpus Christi International Airport and amending the budget. See Item 22 for vote. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 24)P. 24.Activities of the Port of Corpus Christi Authority as presented by the City appointees to the Port Commission of the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, Nueces County, Texas Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 24. Port of Corpus Christi Vice Chair and Commissioner Richard Valls, Jr. presented information on the following topics: the Energy Port of the Americas; record numbers in 2020; financial summary; key 2020 highlights; 2021 budget; Texas 87th Legislature-Bills filed; Senate Bill 275 by Hinojosa; Senate Bill 278 by Hinojosa; Senate Bill 782; proposed Bill by PCCA; and Nueces County Bill. Council Members, Vice Chair Valls, Port of Corpus Christi CEO Sean Strawbridge, Port Commissioner David Engel, Port Commissioner Rajan Ahuja, Page 9City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes City Manager Peter Zanoni and Chief External Affairs Officer Omar Garcia discussed the following topics: the Port's goal is to create economic growth and jobs, maintain infrastructure and create new infrastructure; the Port is investing $155 million for Harbor Island; Port Aransas City Council has not ruled for or against the legislation; this bill would allow municipalities to tax improvements on this property; Council Members' concern that there is a lack of communication between the Port and the City; the desalination workshop that was scheduled prior to November was cancelled and could have improved communication; according to the Port's policy, they do not put up property for sale; the Port does not intend to compete with third-party developers; the decisions the Port makes impact the City and the County; budgets are going to be challenged for school districts and municipalities due to COVID-19; the Port Commissioners are strategic regarding properties they purchase; the Port's investments are geared towards industries and Port related projects; City staff and Port staff meet every two weeks regarding desalination; the Port Commission directed staff to work with City staff on developing language acceptable to the City for the Port's desalination permit; there are options and time for filing the legislation bill; a Council Member's suggestion to get the legislation in as soon as possible; the City of Corpus Christi is the regional water supplier to seven counties; the Port is moving forward with the desalination permit; the City and Port of Corpus Christi's goal is to have an uninterruptible water supply; the Port is one of the greatest economic generators in the community; the importance of scheduling a desalination workshop between the City and the Port of Corpus Christi; and scheduling quarterly presentations to Council. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE:Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 25 - 26)R. Mayor Guajardo referred to Executive Session Item 26. The Council went into Executive Session at 1:49 p.m. The Council returned from Executive Session at 3:30 p.m. Mayor Guajardo referred to Executive Session Item 25. The Council went into Executive Session at 6:03 p.m. The Council returned from Executive Session at 7:37 p.m. 25.Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to (1) rates, charges, and ordinances related to water, wastewater, and gas and (2) potential legislation related to the Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County, Texas. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 26.Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the potential annexation of areas at or near the intersection of FM 43 and London Pirate road (formerly County Road 33) and the potential creation of Page 10City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 March 2, 2021City Council Meeting Minutes special districts covering all or part of said areas, including tax increment financing district(s), tax increment reinvestment zone(s), municipal management district(s), public improvement district(s), and municipal utility district(s) and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to business prospect(s) that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City may conduct economic development negotiations and/or deliberate possible economic development issues concerning said business prospect(s), including but not limited to, The London Proper, LLC.(This item will not be considered in open session.) This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. ADJOURNMENTS. This meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. Page 11City of Corpus Christi Printed on 3/8/2021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of February 23, 2021 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of March 2, 2021 DATE: February 4, 2020 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Richard Martinez, Director of Public Works richardm5@cctexas.com (361) 826-3419 Heather Hurlbert, Director of Finance & Business Analysis heatherh3@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 CAPTION: Ordinance rejecting the apparent low bid of Burnside Services, Inc. as non-responsive for lack of related experience and awarding a construction contract to Clark Pipeline Services, Corpus Christi, Texas, for the reconstruction of Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard, located in Council District 1, with new asphalt pavement and utility improvements in an amount of $5,262,457.37 with FY 2021 funding available from Bond 2018, Bond 2016, Storm Water, Wastewater, Gas, and Water Funds. SUMMARY: This motion approves a construction contract with Clark Pipeline Services for the reconstruction for Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard. The construction will include new asphalt pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, ADA compliant curb ramps, signage, pavement markings, traffic signalization improvements, illumination improvements, and major utility improvements including storm water, wastewater, water, and gas. Construction Contract Award Leopard Street – Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard (Bond 2018, Proposition A) (Bond 2018 Proposition 1 & 2) BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard is classified as a Secondary Arterial Street and is 0.42 miles in length. This section of the street was originally constructed in 1908. The latest sealcoat was completed in 1994 and 2016. The current reconstruction project was approved by voters as part of the Bond 2018 program. The project scope includes reconstruction of street with new pavement, concrete curb & gutter, bus stops, sidewalks, curb ramps, concrete driveways, upgrades to traffic signals, new underground storm sewer system, installation of plastic water main and wastewater main. In addition to the new roadway the following scope of work will be completed:  Three RTA bus and three RTA shelter pads will be constructed.  Upgraded traffic signalization and vehicle detection at Nueces Bay Boulevard.  Significant stormwater improvements including installing new storm water lines along South Side of Leopard, new curb inlets, new manholes and new laterals along the entire project length.  Significant wastewater improvements consisting of replacing to thicker walled polyvinyl chloride pipes (SDR 26 PVC) and more resistant fiberglass manholes.  Water improvements include replacing to polyvinyl chloride pipes (PVC C900) and install 18 new fire hydrants.  Gas valve boxes raised to grade, and gas lines adjusted as necessary. PROJECT TIMELINE: J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M 2018 2019 2021-2022 Design Bid Construction Project schedule reflects City Council award of construction contract in March 2021 with anticipated completion in May 2022. COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION PROCESS The Contracts and Procurement Department issued a Request for Bids for the proposed Leopard Street construction project. The solicitation contained two base bids, Base Bid 1 (asphalt) and Base Bid 2 (concrete). On November 18, 2020, the City received bids for each segment as provided below: CONTRACTOR BASE BID 1 (ASPHALT) BASE BID 2 (CONCRETE) Bay Ltd $6,299,999.00 NO BIID Clark Pipeline Services $5,262,457.37 NO BID *Burnside Services Inc. $4,606,359.05 $5,125,544.35 JE Services $5,533,812.90 $5,657,875.00 Reytec NO BID $5,984,898.00 Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost $5,446,075.47 $6,165,160.36 * - Nonresponsive bidder Per City Council Policy 28 - Award Guidelines for Arterial and Collector Streets, an award recommendation for concrete pavement is made if the total cost of the concrete bid does not exceed $128,000/lane mile ($18.18/SY) of the asphalt cost, majority of the subgrade is with a Plasticity Index of greater than 30 and consideration to the adjacent pavement section to provide uniform pavement surface type. The Plasticity index of the street is between 15-30 and the adjacent pavement section to this project limits is asphalt. This project includes approximately 2.57 lane-miles (5 travel lanes) of pavement. The construction cost difference between the concrete and the asphalt pavement is $ 395,417.63 for 2.57 lane-miles, which equates to $153,859.00 per lane-miles ($21.89/SY). Based on the calculation, and the adjacent pavement section, staff recommends the award of Base Bid 1 for asphalt pavement. Staff analyzed the submitted bids in accordance with contract documents and determined Burnside Services Inc were the lowest responsive and responsible bidders. Due to Burnside Services failure to demonstrate the required experience, their bid was declared non-responsive. Clark Pipeline Services is therefore the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Staff is recommending awarding the contract to Clark Pipeline Services. Clark Pipeline Services has successfully completed the following city projects: Alameda from Six Points to Louisiana in 2019, Ayers Street from Ocean Drive to Alameda Street in 2019, Navigation Boulevard from Leopard Street to Up River Road in 2018, Padre Island Water and Gas Project in 2018, and the Water IDIQ in 2017. Additionally, Clark Pipeline has successfully completed several emergency declaration projects. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is not to award construction contracts to Clark Pipeline Services, and this would delay the project and conflict with City Council’s goal to expedite street projects. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact in FY 2021 is an amount of $5,262,457.37 with funding available from the Bond 2018, Bond 2016, Storm Water, Wastewater, Gas, and Water Funds. Funding Detail: Project expenditures presented in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) were preliminary cost estimates. Funding for the project has been aligned by transferring funds from Bond 2016 reserves. Fund: ST2020 BD 18 P1(Fund 3556) Mission Elem: Street Pavement Maintenance (051) Project: Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd ) (Project No. 18027A) Account: Construction Contract (550910) Activity: 18027-A-3556-EXP Amount: $2,075,938.00 Fund: ST2018 GO BD16 (Fund 3554) Mission Elem: Water Distribution System (041) Project: Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd ) (Project No. 18027A) Account: Construction Contract (550910) Activity: 18027-A-3554-EXP Amount: $803,613.82 Fund: Storm Water 2021 CI (Fund 4533) Mission Elem: Storm Water Drainage (043) Project: Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd ) (Project No. 18027A) Account: Construction Contract (550910) Activity: 18027-A-4533-EXP Amount: $1,087,652.55 Fund: Water 2020 (Fund 4099) Mission Elem: Water Distribution System (041) Project: Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd ) (Project No. 18027A) Account: Construction Contract (550910) Activity: 18027-A-4099-EXP Amount: $623,980.31 Fund: WW Capital Resv (Fund 4258) Mission Elem: Wastewater Collection System (042) Project: Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd ) (Project No. 18027A) Account: Construction Contract (550910) Activity: 18027-A-4258-EXP Amount: $544,318.39 Fund: Gas 2015 Bond (Fund 4561) Mission Elem: Gas Distribution system (022) Project: Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd ) (Project No. 18027A) Account: Construction Contract (550910) Activity: 18027-A-4561-EXP Amount: $126,954.30 RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends awarding construction contract to Clark Pipeline Services for reconstruction of Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard in the account of $5,2625457.37 for asphalt pavement with construction duration planned for 15 months from issuance of the Notice to Proceed with construction starting March 2021. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Maps Bid Tabs Project List Contract CIP Page HMAC Policy Page 1 of 2 Ordinance rejecting the apparent low bid of Burnside Services, Inc. as non-responsive and awarding a construction contract to Clark Pipeline Services, Corpus Christi, Texas, for the reconstruction of Leopard Street from Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard, located in Council District 1, with new asphalt pavement and utility improvements in an amount of $5,262,457.37 with FY 2021 funding available from Bond 2018, Bond 2016, Storm Water, Wastewater, Gas, and Water Funds. WHEREAS, five bids were received on November 18, 2020 for the City’s Leopard Street, Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Blvd, Project No. 18027A; WHEREAS, the bid submitted by Burnside Services, Inc. (“Burnside”) was the apparent low bid in the amount of $4,606,359.05, however the bid was deemed non-responsive by the City because Burnside failed to submit documentation which showed that Burnside had the requisite experience for this type of project. WHEREAS, the second low bid submitted by Clark Pipeline Services, LLP in the amount of $5,262,457.37 shows that Clark Pipeline Services satisfies all the experience requirements and other requirements set out in the Project Bid documents; WHEREAS, the bid exceeds the project budget by $803,613.82, and funding is available from Bond 2016 to fund this Bond 2018, Proposition A project; WHEREAS, Bond 2016 was approved by voters in November 2016, and funds to complete all Bond 2016 projects have been identified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Council supports the use and commitment of $803,613.82 in Bond 2016 proceeds to fund the construction of Leopard Street, Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Boulevard . SECTION 2. The Corpus Christi FY2020-2021 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 032203 is amended to appropriate $803,613.82 and increase expenditures by $803,613.82. SECTION 3. The bid of Burnside Services, Inc. for the City’s Leopard Street, Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Blvd, Project No. 18027A is rejected as non-responsive due to failure of Burnside to provide documentation that demonstrates that Burnside has the requisite amount and type of experience for the City’s Project as required by the Bid Documents. SECTION 4 The City Council hereby finds that the bid submitted by Clark Pipeline Services is the lowest responsive bid submitted for the Leopard Street, Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Blvd, Project No. 18027A, and the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute a contract with CPC Interests, LLC dba Clark Pipeline Services in the amount of $5,262,457.37 for the Leopard Street, Palm Drive to Nueces Bay Blvd, Project No. 18027A. Page 2 of 2 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo _____________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera __________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ___________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ___________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ___________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ______________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor PORTLEOPARD PALMUP RIVER HULBIRT NOAKES MINTON L I P A N KOEPKEFLORAL PARRANTELOPE WESTGATEMOORE NUECES BAYBUDDY LAWRENCE LILYBUFFALO MAGNOLIA C O M A N C H EROSE DRISCOLLOLIVERAZALEAI N D U S T R I A LOLD ROBSTOWNEASTGATEBLUNTZERHUISACHE FAIRVIEWGARDENIAS O U T H L A N DLONGVIEWLIGUSTRUMNANDINAMUELLER GRANADA KENWOOD BLUEBONNETTULIP KENNEDYMESTINA PALMKENWOOD NUECES BAYBUDDY LAWRENCELEOPARD STREET-PALM DRIVE TONUECES BAY BOULEVARD Location Map CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXASDEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Proje ct L ocation PROJECT NO. 18027A . BID DATE: Wed., November 18, 2021 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT 2-A1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART A)LS 1 $12,843.00 12,843.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ 2-A2 BONDS AND INSURANCE (AS REQUIRED)AL 1 $75,600.00 75,600.00$ $95,000.00 95,000.00$ $62,000.00 62,000.00$ 2-A3 CLEAR RIGHT-OF-WAY AC 0.81 $10,000.00 8,100.00$ $120,000.00 97,200.00$ $54,000.00 43,740.00$ 2-A4 LOW PROFILE CONCRETE BARRIERS EA 61.5 $1,300.00 79,950.00$ $1,650.00 101,475.00$ $1,300.00 79,950.00$ 2-A5 TCP PLAN AND PREP LS 1 $7,800.00 7,800.00$ $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $12,000.00 12,000.00$ 2-A6 TCP MOBILIZATION/ADJUSTMENTS LS 1 $34,430.00 34,430.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ $7,600.00 7,600.00$ 2-A7 TCP ITEMS (BARRELS, CONES, ETC.)MO 14 $2,534.00 35,476.00$ $2,500.00 35,000.00$ $15,000.00 210,000.00$ 2-A8 TCP - ELECTRIC MESSAGE BOARDS DAY 20 $230.00 4,600.00$ $200.00 4,000.00$ $200.00 4,000.00$ 2-A9 TCP - CROSSING GUARDS DAY 175 $70.00 12,250.00$ $250.00 43,750.00$ $188.00 32,900.00$ 2-A10 TCP - PAVEMENT REPAIRS LS 1 $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $13,000.00 13,000.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ 2-A11 TCP - ADJUSTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEADS AL 1 $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 2-A12 STORM WATER PULLUTION PREVENTION PLAN LS 1 $35,000.00 35,000.00$ $1,900.00 1,900.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ 2-A13 SILT FENCE LF 1,794 $1.10 1,973.40$ $3.50 6,279.00$ $2.00 3,588.00$ 2-A14 BLOCK SODDING SY 153 $5.70 872.10$ $18.00 2,754.00$ $10.00 1,530.00$ 333,894.50$ 457,358.00$ 527,308.00$ NO BID NO BID 2-B1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART B)LS 1 $71,506.00 71,506.00$ $80,000.00 80,000.00$ $100,000.00 100,000.00$ 2-B2 STREET EXCAVATION SY 19,941 $9.00 179,469.00$ $10.00 199,410.00$ $10.00 199,410.00$ 2-B3 JOINTED PLAIN CONCRETE PAVEMENT (9 IN)SY 18,881 $82.00 1,548,242.00$ $72.00 1,359,432.00$ $91.00 1,718,171.00$ 2-B4 PRIME COAT (MC-30)GAL 2,832 $5.50 15,576.00$ $5.00 14,160.00$ $6.00 16,992.00$ 2-B5 6" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE (TY A, GR. 1-2)SY 19,941 $16.00 319,056.00$ $13.00 259,233.00$ $13.00 259,233.00$ 2-B6 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE SY 19,941 $2.75 54,837.75$ $1.80 35,893.80$ $4.00 79,764.00$ 2-B7 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (WORD)EA 4 $250.00 1,000.00$ $300.00 1,200.00$ $252.00 1,008.00$ 2-B8 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (ARROW)EA 15 $250.00 3,750.00$ $240.00 3,600.00$ $187.00 2,805.00$ 2-B9 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (4") (DOT)(090 MIL)LF 33 $1.50 49.50$ $1.00 33.00$ $0.75 24.75$ 2-B10 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (8") (SLD)(090 MIL)LF 550 $2.75 1,512.50$ $1.50 825.00$ $1.50 825.00$ CC, TX 78409 TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS - CONTRACTS AND PROCUREMENT DEPT. RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 PART A - GENERAL SUBTOTAL PART A - GENERAL PART B - STREET IMPROVEMENTS BASE BID 2 - CONCRETE (RIGID) 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 Page 1 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 2-B11 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (12") (SOLID)(090 MIL)LF 147 $4.10 602.70$ $7.00 1,029.00$ $6.00 882.00$ 2-B12 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (4") (BRK)(090 MIL)LF 1,090 $1.50 1,635.00$ $1.00 1,090.00$ $0.75 817.50$ 2-B13 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (24") (SLD) (090 MIL) LF 1,379 $18.00 24,822.00$ $12.00 16,548.00$ $10.00 13,790.00$ 2-B14 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKINGS TY I (Y) 4" (BRK)(090 MIL)LF 660 $1.50 990.00$ $1.00 660.00$ $0.75 495.00$ 2-B15 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE I (Y) (4") (SLD)(090 MIL)LF 4,829 $4.10 19,798.90$ $1.00 4,829.00$ $0.75 3,621.75$ 2-B16 PAVEMENT SEALER 4" LF 6,612 $1.00 6,612.00$ $0.30 1,983.60$ $0.25 1,653.00$ 2-B17 PAVEMENT SEALER 8" LF 550 $1.50 825.00$ $0.65 357.50$ $0.50 275.00$ 2-B18 PAVEMENT SEALER 12" LF 147 $3.00 441.00$ $1.00 147.00$ $0.75 110.25$ 2-B19 PAVEMENT SEALER 24" LF 1,379 $4.00 5,516.00$ $2.00 2,758.00$ $1.55 2,137.45$ 2-B20 TY I-C RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTORIZED)EA 62 $12.00 744.00$ $6.00 372.00$ $5.05 313.10$ 2-B21 TY-II-A-A RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTORIZED)EA 255 $12.00 3,060.00$ $6.00 1,530.00$ $5.05 1,287.75$ 2-B22 REMOVE EXISTING STREET SIGNS AND ASSEMBLIES EA 29 $800.00 23,200.00$ $190.00 5,510.00$ $61.00 1,769.00$ 2-B23 IN SM RD SN SUP & AM TY 10BWG (1)SA(P)EA 25 $1,032.00 25,800.00$ $1,000.00 25,000.00$ $833.00 20,825.00$ 2-B24 IN SM RD SN SUP & AM TY 10BWG (1)SA(P-BM)EA 9 $1,170.00 10,530.00$ $1,200.00 10,800.00$ $985.00 8,865.00$ 2-B25 CONCRETE MEDIAN CAP SF 5,053 $6.50 32,844.50$ $6.00 30,318.00$ $5.00 25,265.00$ 2-B26 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 1,259 $61.00 76,799.00$ $95.00 119,605.00$ $93.00 117,087.00$ 2-B27 UNANTICIPATED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REMOVAL SF 100 $8.00 800.00$ $21.00 2,100.00$ $5.00 500.00$ 2-B28 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED STREET IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ 2,455,018.85$ 2,203,423.90$ 2,602,926.55$ NO BID NO BID 2-C1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART C)LS 1 $16,500.00 16,500.00$ $17,000.00 17,000.00$ $18,000.00 18,000.00$ 2-C2 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (24 IN)LF 24 $215.00 5,160.00$ $160.00 3,840.00$ $126.00 3,024.00$ 2-C3 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (36 IN)LF 47 $279.00 13,113.00$ $400.00 18,800.00$ $313.00 14,711.00$ 2-C4 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (48 IN)LF 23 $500.00 11,500.00$ $650.00 14,950.00$ $505.00 11,615.00$ 2-C5 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (2") LF 425 $10.00 4,250.00$ $20.00 8,500.00$ $28.00 11,900.00$ 2-C6 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (4") LF 441 $21.00 9,261.00$ $25.00 11,025.00$ $32.00 14,112.00$ 2-C7 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (2") (BORE)LF 263 $23.00 6,049.00$ $25.00 6,575.00$ $32.00 8,416.00$ 2-C8 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (4") (BORE)LF 525 $29.00 15,225.00$ $41.00 21,525.00$ $44.00 23,100.00$ SUBTOTAL PART B - STREET IMPROVEMENTS PART C - TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Page 2 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 2-C9 2 CONDR (NO.12) WITH GROUND (LUMINAIRE WIRE)LF 704 $1.00 704.00$ $2.00 1,408.00$ $1.80 1,267.20$ 2-C10 ELEC CONDR (NO. 6) BARE LF 37 $1.00 37.00$ $6.00 222.00$ $5.05 186.85$ 2-C11 ELEC CONDR (NO. 6) INSULATED LF 74 $1.50 111.00$ $6.00 444.00$ $5.05 373.70$ 2-C12 ELEC CONDR (NO. 8) BARE LF 1,512 $1.50 2,268.00$ $2.00 3,024.00$ $1.75 2,646.00$ 2-C13 TRAY CABLE (3 CONDR) (12 AWG)LF 1,317 $2.15 2,831.55$ $2.00 2,634.00$ $1.85 2,436.45$ 2-C14 TRAY CABLE (3 CONDR) (14 AWG)LF 875 $2.50 2,187.50$ $2.00 1,750.00$ $1.95 1,706.25$ 2-C15 GROUND BOX TY D WITH APRON EA 10 $1,240.00 12,400.00$ $1,400.00 14,000.00$ $1,110.00 11,100.00$ 2-C16 INSTALL HWY TRF SIG (ISOLATED)EA 1 $8,760.00 8,760.00$ $4,000.00 4,000.00$ $3,230.00 3,230.00$ 2-C17 ELC SRV TY D 120/240 060 (NS)SS(E)PS(U)EA 1 $8,100.00 8,100.00$ $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $5,850.00 5,850.00$ 2-C18 ILSN (LED) 8S (DURALIGHT) (FIXED MOUNT)EA 4 $3,100.00 12,400.00$ $3,800.00 15,200.00$ $2,980.00 11,920.00$ 2-C19 REMOVING TRAFFIC SIGNALS EA 1 $3,600.00 3,600.00$ $4,600.00 4,600.00$ $2,525.00 2,525.00$ 2-C20 LOUVERED VACUUM FORMED ABS BACK PLATE (12")(3 SEC)EA 8 $120.00 960.00$ $100.00 800.00$ $86.00 688.00$ 2-C21 LOUVERED VACUUM FORMED ABS BACK PLATE (12")(4 SEC)EA 3 $147.00 441.00$ $140.00 420.00$ $111.00 333.00$ 2-C22 DURALIGHT COUNTDOWN PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL MODULE (16 INCH)EA 8 $602.00 4,816.00$ $600.00 4,800.00$ $480.00 3,840.00$ 2-C23 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (12 AWG) (4 CONDR) LF 294 $1.25 367.50$ $2.00 588.00$ $1.75 514.50$ 2-C24 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (5 CONDR) LF 327 $1.65 539.55$ $2.00 654.00$ $1.95 637.65$ 2-C25 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (7 CONDR) LF 237 $1.65 391.05$ $2.50 592.50$ $2.00 474.00$ 2-C26 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (16 CONDR) LF 698 $3.00 2,094.00$ $5.00 3,490.00$ $4.25 2,966.50$ 2-C27 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (24') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $9,000.00 9,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $8,180.00 8,180.00$ 2-C28 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (32') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $9,560.00 9,560.00$ $11,000.00 11,000.00$ $8,940.00 8,940.00$ 2-C29 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (44') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $10,830.00 10,830.00$ $14,000.00 14,000.00$ $11,392.00 11,392.00$ 2-C30 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (60') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $23,410.00 23,410.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $19,876.00 19,876.00$ 2-C31 PED POLE ASSEMBLY EA 4 $1,345.00 5,380.00$ $1,200.00 4,800.00$ $984.00 3,936.00$ 2-C32 POLARA PUSH BUTTON (APS) W/R10-3E SIGN EA 8 $815.00 6,520.00$ $900.00 7,200.00$ $717.00 5,736.00$ 2-C33 PED DETECTOR CONTROLLER UNIT EA 1 $4,100.00 4,100.00$ $4,500.00 4,500.00$ $3,838.00 3,838.00$ 2-C34 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (GRN) EA 8 $247.00 1,976.00$ $300.00 2,400.00$ $247.00 1,976.00$ 2-C35 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (GRN ARW) EA 3 $247.00 741.00$ $300.00 900.00$ $247.00 741.00$ 2-C36 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (YEL) EA 8 $247.00 1,976.00$ $300.00 2,400.00$ $247.00 1,976.00$ Page 3 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 2-C37 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (YEL ARW) EA 6 $247.00 1,482.00$ $300.00 1,800.00$ $247.00 1,482.00$ 2-C38 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (RED) EA 8 $247.00 1,976.00$ $300.00 2,400.00$ $247.00 1,976.00$ 2-C39 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (RED ARW) EA 3 $247.00 741.00$ $300.00 900.00$ $247.00 741.00$ 2-C40 ALPHA FXM 2000 UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY WITH CABINET EA 1 $7,850.00 7,850.00$ $8,000.00 8,000.00$ $6,262.00 6,262.00$ 2-C41 RADAR PRESENCE DETECTOR (WAVETRONIX) EA 4 $5,365.00 21,460.00$ $7,900.00 31,600.00$ $6,161.00 24,644.00$ 2-C42 RADAR PRESENCE DETECTOR COMM & POWER CABLE (SMARTSENSOR 6/C)LF 782 $4.00 3,128.00$ $3.80 2,971.60$ $3.05 2,385.10$ 2-C43 SCHOOL ZONE FLASHER ASSEMBLY (REMOVE AND REPLACE)EA 2 $8,500.00 17,000.00$ $6,500.00 13,000.00$ $5,151.00 10,302.00$ 2-C44 CAMERA PTZ (PELCO SPECTRA ENHANCED SERIES) WITH PELCO PA402 MOUNT EA 1 $4,500.00 4,500.00$ $4,600.00 4,600.00$ $3,626.00 3,626.00$ 2-C45 ETHERNET CABLE CAT5E FOR PTZ LF 184 $3.30 607.20$ $6.00 1,104.00$ $5.05 929.20$ 2-C46 WAVETRONIX CLICK 656 CABINET INTERFACE DEVICE EA 1 $4,900.00 4,900.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $3,939.00 3,939.00$ 2-C47 DATA AGGREGATOR DA-400, POWER/COMM CABLE AND 5-BAND ANTENNA EA 1 $5,400.00 5,400.00$ $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $5,726.00 5,726.00$ 2-C48 MAST ARM DAMPING PLATE EA 1 $269.00 269.00$ $700.00 700.00$ $555.00 555.00$ 2-C49 CONTROLLER CABINET (TS-2) WITH EXTENSION EA 1 $13,800.00 13,800.00$ $13,000.00 13,000.00$ $10,625.00 10,625.00$ 2-C50 NEMA TYPE CONTROLLER FOUNDATION EA 1 $3,500.00 3,500.00$ $2,700.00 2,700.00$ $2,121.00 2,121.00$ 2-C51 CONTROLLER ECONOLITE COBALT EA 1 $3,900.00 3,900.00$ $4,600.00 4,600.00$ $3,560.00 3,560.00$ 2-C52 MMU2-16LEIP WITH ETHERNET PORT EA 1 $1,140.00 1,140.00$ $1,500.00 1,500.00$ $1,247.00 1,247.00$ 2-C53 CISCO ETHERNET 4000 SWITCH (IE-4000-8GT8GP4G- E) AND POWER SUPPLY (PWR-IE170W-PC-AC=)EA 1 $8,500.00 8,500.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $8,383.00 8,383.00$ 2-C54 MIMOSA-B5 BACKHAUL RADIO EA 1 $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $4,000.00 4,000.00$ $3,131.00 3,131.00$ 2-C55 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION (2 INTERSECTIONS)LS 1 $65,000.00 65,000.00$ $8,400.00 8,400.00$ $6,565.00 6,565.00$ 2-C56 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ 394,712.35$ 378,317.10$ 327,363.40$ NO BID NO BID 2-D1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART D)LS 1 $213.00 213.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $500.00 500.00$ 2-D2 CONCRETE BUS SHELTER PAD SF 900 $6.75 6,075.00$ $17.00 15,300.00$ $16.00 14,400.00$ 2-D3 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED RTA IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 7,288.00$ 18,300.00$ 15,900.00$ NO BID NO BID SUBTOTAL PART C - TRAFFIC SIGNALS IMPR PART D - RTA IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART D - RTA IMPROVEMENTS Page 4 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 2-E1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART E)LS 1 $5,015.00 5,015.00$ $12,000.00 12,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 2-E2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 15,308 $6.25 95,675.00$ $8.00 122,464.00$ $8.60 131,648.80$ 2-E3 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 263 $35.00 9,205.00$ $54.00 14,202.00$ $27.00 7,101.00$ 2-E4 CONCRETE CURB RAMPS SF 4,167 $8.70 36,252.90$ $28.00 116,676.00$ $21.00 87,507.00$ 2-E5 SIDEWALK RETAINING CURB LF 50 $25.00 1,250.00$ $65.00 3,250.00$ $32.00 1,600.00$ 2-E6 SIDEWALK DRAIN LF 50 $100.00 5,000.00$ $200.00 10,000.00$ $390.00 19,500.00$ 2-E7 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (24") (SOLID) - CROSSWALK LF 959 $18.00 17,262.00$ $12.00 11,508.00$ $10.00 9,590.00$ 2-E8 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED ADA IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ 172,159.90$ 292,600.00$ 269,446.80$ NO BID NO BID 2-F1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART F)LS 1 $21,326.00 21,326.00$ $40,000.00 40,000.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ 2-F2 REMOVE EXISTING INLET OR MANHOLE EA 1 $800.00 800.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $500.00 500.00$ 2-F3 5' DIAMETER CONCRETE MANHOLE (TYPE-A) (CAST IN PLACE)EA 4 $4,500.00 18,000.00$ $8,000.00 32,000.00$ $5,500.00 22,000.00$ 2-F4 6' DIAMETER CONCRETE MANHOLE (TYPE-A) (CAST IN PLACE)EA 3 $6,000.00 18,000.00$ $9,000.00 27,000.00$ $7,500.00 22,500.00$ 2-F5 REMOVE EXISTING REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (15" - 36")LF 437 $25.00 10,925.00$ $39.00 17,043.00$ $8.00 3,496.00$ 2-F6 CONCRETE CURB LF 5,073 $18.00 91,314.00$ $23.00 116,679.00$ $5.25 26,633.25$ 2-F7 6' CONCRETE CURB INLET (CAST IN PLACE)EA 9 $7,800.00 70,200.00$ $9,000.00 81,000.00$ $5,400.00 48,600.00$ 2-F8 5' CONCRETE CURB INLET THROAT EXTENSION EA 28 $4,500.00 126,000.00$ $2,000.00 56,000.00$ $2,600.00 72,800.00$ 2-F9 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 5' CURB INLET TOP (CAST IN PLACE)EA 9 $4,000.00 36,000.00$ $3,000.00 27,000.00$ $2,400.00 21,600.00$ 2-F10 18" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 292 $79.00 23,068.00$ $160.00 46,720.00$ $148.00 43,216.00$ 2-F11 24" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 70 $86.00 6,020.00$ $180.00 12,600.00$ $161.00 11,270.00$ 2-F12 36" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 1,186 $133.00 157,738.00$ $200.00 237,200.00$ $220.00 260,920.00$ 2-F13 42" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 801 $162.00 129,762.00$ $230.00 184,230.00$ $267.00 213,867.00$ 2-F14 TRENCH SAFETY (STORM WATER INLETS OR MANHOLES)EA 13 $300.00 3,900.00$ $650.00 8,450.00$ $100.00 1,300.00$ 2-F15 TRENCH SAFETY (STORM WATER LINE)LF 2,349 $1.75 4,110.75$ $6.00 14,094.00$ $2.00 4,698.00$ 2-F16 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ PART E - ADA IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART E - ADA IMPROVEMENTS PART F - STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS Page 5 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 732,163.75$ 917,016.00$ 798,400.25$ NO BID NO BID 2-G1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART G)LS 1 $12,697.00 12,697.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ 2-G2 8" PVC C900 WATERLINE LF 2,578 $44.00 113,432.00$ $90.00 232,020.00$ $105.00 270,690.00$ 2-G3 8" DI WATERLINE LF 170 $89.00 15,130.00$ $270.00 45,900.00$ $152.00 25,840.00$ 2-G4 10" PVC C900 WATERLINE LF 64 $55.00 3,520.00$ $175.00 11,200.00$ $130.00 8,320.00$ 2-G5 6" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 1 $1,575.00 1,575.00$ $1,500.00 1,500.00$ $1,430.00 1,430.00$ 2-G6 8" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,920.00 3,840.00$ $1,900.00 3,800.00$ $1,773.00 3,546.00$ 2-G7 10" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 2 $2,500.00 5,000.00$ $3,200.00 6,400.00$ $2,525.00 5,050.00$ 2-G8 16" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 1 $5,500.00 5,500.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $8,200.00 8,200.00$ 2-G9 8" 45° DIMJ BEND EA 55 $165.00 9,075.00$ $350.00 19,250.00$ $440.00 24,200.00$ 2-G10 10" 45° DIMJ BEND EA 2 $305.00 610.00$ $400.00 800.00$ $610.00 1,220.00$ 2-G11 8" WATER VALVE EA 18 $1,920.00 34,560.00$ $1,900.00 34,200.00$ $1,450.00 26,100.00$ 2-G12 10" WATER VALVE EA 1 $2,520.00 2,520.00$ $3,200.00 3,200.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ 2-G13 8" DIMJ ELBOW EA 2 $165.00 330.00$ $600.00 1,200.00$ $660.00 1,320.00$ 2-G14 8" X 8" DIMJ CROSS RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,400.00 2,800.00$ $500.00 1,000.00$ $670.00 1,340.00$ 2-G15 8" X 6" DIMJ TEE EA 18 $210.00 3,780.00$ $250.00 4,500.00$ $300.00 5,400.00$ 2-G16 8" X 6" DIMJ REDUCER EA 3 $450.00 1,350.00$ $200.00 600.00$ $446.00 1,338.00$ 2-G17 8" X 8" DIMJ TEE EA 3 $264.00 792.00$ $500.00 1,500.00$ $600.00 1,800.00$ 2-G18 8" X 10" DIMJ TEE EA 1 $440.00 440.00$ $900.00 900.00$ $1,046.00 1,046.00$ 2-G19 6" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,200.00 2,400.00$ $2,000.00 4,000.00$ $2,328.00 4,656.00$ 2-G20 8" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 6 $1,800.00 10,800.00$ $2,000.00 12,000.00$ $2,360.00 14,160.00$ 2-G21 10" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 1 $2,200.00 2,200.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $3,243.00 3,243.00$ 2-G22 8" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE EA 1 $3,542.00 3,542.00$ $16,000.00 16,000.00$ $9,734.00 9,734.00$ 2-G23 16" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE EA 1 $4,800.00 4,800.00$ $17,000.00 17,000.00$ $11,000.00 11,000.00$ 2-G24 6" PLUG EA 3 $500.00 1,500.00$ $200.00 600.00$ $1,009.00 3,027.00$ 2-G25 8" PLUG EA 5 $650.00 3,250.00$ $200.00 1,000.00$ $1,217.00 6,085.00$ 2-G26 10" PLUG EA 1 $800.00 800.00$ $300.00 300.00$ $1,563.00 1,563.00$ 2-G27 NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (TYPE 1)EA 18 $5,100.00 91,800.00$ $6,000.00 108,000.00$ $11,000.00 198,000.00$ 2-G28 REPLACE EXISTING WATER SERVICE WITH NEW WATER SERVICE LINE W/CONNECTION EA 9 $2,800.00 25,200.00$ $2,500.00 22,500.00$ $1,683.00 15,147.00$ 2-G29 1" WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (INCLUDING METER ASSEMBLY AND METER BOX)EA 9 $2,800.00 25,200.00$ $1,200.00 10,800.00$ $617.00 5,553.00$ 2-G30 CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER LINE EA 12 $2,800.00 33,600.00$ $1,000.00 12,000.00$ $400.00 4,800.00$ PART G - WATER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART F - STORM WATER IMPR Page 6 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 2-G31 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WATER LINES LF 2,578 $1.50 3,867.00$ $3.00 7,734.00$ $2.00 5,156.00$ 2-G32 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED WATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 435,910.00$ 631,904.00$ 711,464.00$ NO BID NO BID 2-H1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART H)LS 1 $13,038.00 13,038.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ 2-H2 4' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (6' DEPTH OR LESS) (FIBERGLASS)EA 9 $8,000.00 72,000.00$ $9,000.00 81,000.00$ $13,000.00 117,000.00$ 2-H3 EXTRA DEPTH FOR 4' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (OVER 6' DEPTH) (FIBERGLASS)VF 35 $250.00 8,750.00$ $1,300.00 45,500.00$ $145.00 5,075.00$ 2-H4 EXTRA DEPTH FOR 5' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (OVER 6' DEPTH) (FIBERGLASS)VF 5 $275.00 1,375.00$ $1,500.00 7,500.00$ $265.00 1,325.00$ 2-H5 5' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (6' DEPTH OR LESS) (FIBERGLASS)EA 1 $12,500.00 12,500.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $14,000.00 14,000.00$ 2-H6 ADJUST EXISTING WASTEWATER MANHOLE RIM TO GRADE EA 1 $800.00 800.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ 2-H7 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (0' - 6' DEPTH)LF 9 $44.00 396.00$ $145.00 1,305.00$ $200.00 1,800.00$ 2-H8 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (6' - 8' DEPTH)LF 288 $46.00 13,248.00$ $155.00 44,640.00$ $132.00 38,016.00$ 2-H9 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (8' - 10' DEPTH)LF 324 $48.00 15,552.00$ $180.00 58,320.00$ $140.00 45,360.00$ 2-H10 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (10' - 12' DEPTH)LF 75 $50.00 3,750.00$ $215.00 16,125.00$ $145.00 10,875.00$ 2-H11 10" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (8' - 10' DEPTH)LF 503 $65.00 32,695.00$ $195.00 98,085.00$ $150.00 75,450.00$ 2-H12 10" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (10' - 12' DEPTH)LF 655 $70.00 45,850.00$ $200.00 131,000.00$ $158.00 103,490.00$ 2-H13 GROUT FILL (8" - 10") VCP WASTEWATER LINE LF 1,468 $68.00 99,824.00$ $15.00 22,020.00$ $15.00 22,020.00$ 2-H14 SHORT WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE (INCLUDES NEW SERVICE LINE, CLEANOUT, AND CONNECTION)EA 6 $12,000.00 72,000.00$ $7,000.00 42,000.00$ $2,600.00 15,600.00$ 2-H15 LONG WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE (INCLUDES NEW SERVICE LINE, CLEANOUT, AND CONNECTION)EA 3 $15,000.00 45,000.00$ $12,000.00 36,000.00$ $3,200.00 9,600.00$ 2-H16 DROP CONNECTION AT MANHOLE EA 1 $4,820.00 4,820.00$ $2,300.00 2,300.00$ $3,800.00 3,800.00$ 2-H17 TRENCH SAFETY (WASTEWATER MANHOLES)EA 9 $250.00 2,250.00$ $650.00 5,850.00$ $320.00 2,880.00$ 2-H18 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WASTEWATER MAIN LF 1,854 $1.50 2,781.00$ $7.00 12,978.00$ $3.00 5,562.00$ 2-H19 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ SUBTOTAL PART G - WATER IMPROVEMENTS PART H - WASTEWTR IMPROVEMENTS Page 7 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services Inc Bay LtdReytec Constr Resources Clark Pipeline ServicesJE Constr Services LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Road 401 Corn Products Rd Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 1901 Hollister Houston, TX 77080 6229 Leopard St7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 456,629.00$ 657,123.00$ 504,353.00$ NO BID NO BID 2-I1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART I)LS 1 $2,741.00 2,741.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ 2-I2 EXCAVATION, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION OF GAS LINES LF 5,423 $15.00 81,345.00$ $5.00 27,115.00$ $30.00 162,690.00$ 2-I3 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE BOX TO FINISHED GRADE EA 2 $4,500.00 9,000.00$ $700.00 1,400.00$ $700.00 1,400.00$ 2-I4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED GAS IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 94,086.00$ 30,515.00$ 170,090.00$ NO BID NO BID 2-J1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART J)LS 1 $1,264.00 1,264.00$ $3,000.00 3,000.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ 2-J2 2" PVC SCHEDULE 40 I.T. CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING AND MULE TAPE LF 2,486 $13.00 32,318.00$ $13.00 32,318.00$ $11.00 27,346.00$ 2-J3 24"X36"X18" I.T. PULL BOX (INSTALLATION ONLY)EA 14 $650.00 9,100.00$ $2,500.00 35,000.00$ $1,950.00 27,300.00$ 2-J4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED I.T. IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 43,682.00$ 71,318.00$ 57,646.00$ 5,125,544.35$ 5,657,875.00$ 5,984,898.00$ NO BID NO BID SUBTOTAL PART J - I.T. IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BID 1 HMAC - (PARTS A THRU J) SUBTOTAL PART H - WASTEWTR IMPR PART I - GAS IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART I - GAS IMPROVEMENTS PART J - I.T. IMPROVEMENTS Page 8 of 8 BID DATE: Wed., November 18, 2021 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT 1-A1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART A)LS 1 $12,661.00 12,661.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ $18,500.00 18,500.00$ 1-A2 BONDS AND INSURANCE (AS REQUIRED)AL 1 $67,900.00 67,900.00$ $52,000.00 52,000.00$ $93,000.00 93,000.00$ $50,000.00 50,000.00$ 1-A3 CLEAR RIGHT-OF-WAY AC 0.81 $10,000.00 8,100.00$ $9,000.00 7,290.00$ $120,000.00 97,200.00$ $313,250.00 253,732.50$ 1-A4 OZONE ACTION DAY EA 5 $500.00 2,500.00$ $420.00 2,100.00$ $600.00 3,000.00$ $1.00 5.00$ 1-A5 LOW PROFILE CONCRETE BARRIERS EA 62 $1,300.00 80,600.00$ $750.00 46,500.00$ $1,650.00 102,300.00$ $1,500.00 93,000.00$ 1-A6 TCP PLAN AND PREP LS 1 $7,800.00 7,800.00$ $18,600.00 18,600.00$ $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $8,120.00 8,120.00$ 1-A7 TCP MOBILIZATION/ADJUSTMENTS LS 1 $34,430.00 34,430.00$ $32,400.00 32,400.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ $35,000.00 35,000.00$ 1-A8 TCP ITEMS (BARRELS, CONES, ETC.)MO 14 $2,534.00 35,476.00$ $3,733.20 52,264.80$ $2,500.00 35,000.00$ $6,100.00 85,400.00$ 1-A9 TCP - ELECTRIC MESSAGE BOARDS DAY 20 $230.00 4,600.00$ $810.00 16,200.00$ $200.00 4,000.00$ $200.00 4,000.00$ 1-A10 TCP - CROSSING GUARDS DAY 175 $70.00 12,250.00$ $210.00 36,750.00$ $250.00 43,750.00$ $265.00 46,375.00$ 1-A11 TCP - PAVEMENT REPAIRS LS 1 $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ $13,000.00 13,000.00$ $38,200.00 38,200.00$ 1-A12 TCP - ADJUSTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEADS AL 1 $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 1-A13 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN LS 1 $35,000.00 35,000.00$ $20,880.00 20,880.00$ $1,900.00 1,900.00$ $1,500.00 1,500.00$ 1-A14 SILT FENCE FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION LF 1,794 $1.10 1,973.40$ $4.80 8,611.20$ $3.50 6,279.00$ $7.50 13,455.00$ 1-A15 BLOCK SODDING SY 153 $5.70 872.10$ $11.70 1,790.10$ $18.00 2,754.00$ $20.00 3,060.00$ 329,162.50$ 350,386.10$ 459,183.00$ 660,347.50$ NO BID 1-B1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART B)LS 1 $56,114.00 56,114.00$ $45,000.00 45,000.00$ $90,000.00 90,000.00$ $18,000.00 18,000.00$ 1-B2 STREET EXCAVATION SY 19,941 $9.00 179,469.00$ $12.00 239,292.00$ $11.00 219,351.00$ $9.00 179,469.00$ 1-B3 TYPE D HOT-MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT (2.5") (INCLUDES TACK COAT)SY 18,064 $20.50 370,312.00$ $21.00 379,344.00$ $20.00 361,280.00$ $19.50 352,248.00$ 1-B4 TYPE B HOT-MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT (5")SY 18,064 $33.50 605,144.00$ $31.50 569,016.00$ $36.00 650,304.00$ $28.00 505,792.00$ 1-B5 PRIME COAT (MC-30)GAL 2,710 $5.50 14,905.00$ $7.68 20,812.80$ $5.00 13,550.00$ $5.25 14,227.50$ 1-B6 7" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE (TY A, GR. 1-2)SY 19,941 $17.50 348,967.50$ $25.20 502,513.20$ $15.00 299,115.00$ $16.00 319,056.00$ 1-B7 TENSAR TX5 GEOGRID OR EQUAL SY 19,941 $2.20 43,870.20$ $5.40 107,681.40$ $3.00 59,823.00$ $1.75 34,896.75$ 1-B8 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE SY 19,941 $2.75 54,837.75$ $5.08 101,300.28$ $1.80 35,893.80$ $2.75 54,837.75$ 1-B9 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) EA 4 $250.00 1,000.00$ $300.00 1,200.00$ $300.00 1,200.00$ $330.00 1,320.00$ LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St SUBTOTAL PART A - GENERAL PART B - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 PART A - GENERAL BASE BID 1 - HMAC (FLEXIBLE) 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS - CONTRACTS AND PROCUREMENT DEPT. RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd Page 1 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 1-B10 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (ARROW)EA 15 $250.00 3,750.00$ $222.00 3,330.00$ $240.00 3,600.00$ $245.00 3,675.00$ 1-B11 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (4") (DOT)(090 MIL)LF 33 $1.50 49.50$ $0.90 29.70$ $1.00 33.00$ $1.00 33.00$ 1-B12 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (8") (SLD)(090 MIL)LF 550 $2.75 1,512.50$ $1.80 990.00$ $1.50 825.00$ $2.00 1,100.00$ 1-B13 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (12") (SOLID)(090 MIL)LF 147 $4.10 602.70$ $7.20 1,058.40$ $7.00 1,029.00$ $8.00 1,176.00$ 1-B14 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (4") (BRK)(090 MIL)LF 1,090 $1.50 1,635.00$ $0.90 981.00$ $1.00 1,090.00$ $1.00 1,090.00$ 1-B15 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (24") (SLD) (090 MIL) LF 1,379 $18.00 24,822.00$ $12.00 16,548.00$ $12.00 16,548.00$ $13.00 17,927.00$ 1-B16 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKINGS TY I (Y) 4" (BRK)(090 MIL)LF 660 $1.50 990.00$ $0.90 594.00$ $1.00 660.00$ $1.00 660.00$ 1-B17 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE I (Y) (4") (SLD)(090 MIL)LF 4,829 $4.10 19,798.90$ $0.90 4,346.10$ $1.00 4,829.00$ $1.00 4,829.00$ 1-B18 TY I-C RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTORIZED)EA 62 $12.00 744.00$ $6.00 372.00$ $6.00 372.00$ $8.00 496.00$ 1-B19 TY-II-A-A RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTORIZED)EA 255 $12.00 3,060.00$ $6.00 1,530.00$ $6.00 1,530.00$ $8.00 2,040.00$ 1-B20 REMOVE EXISTING STREET SIGNS AND ASSEMBLIES EA 29 $800.00 23,200.00$ $102.00 2,958.00$ $190.00 5,510.00$ $135.00 3,915.00$ 1-B21 IN SM RD SN SUP & AM TY 10BWG (1)SA(P)EA 25 $1,032.00 25,800.00$ $990.00 24,750.00$ $1,000.00 25,000.00$ $1,090.00 27,250.00$ 1-B22 IN SM RD SN SUP & AM TY 10BWG (1)SA(P-BM)EA 9 $1,170.00 10,530.00$ $1,170.00 10,530.00$ $1,200.00 10,800.00$ $1,280.00 11,520.00$ 1-B23 CONCRETE MEDIAN CAP SF 5,053 $6.50 32,844.50$ $9.60 48,508.80$ $6.00 30,318.00$ $12.00 60,636.00$ 1-B24 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 1,259 $61.00 76,799.00$ $14.17 17,840.03$ $95.00 119,605.00$ $118.00 148,562.00$ 1-B25 UNANTICIPATED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REMOVAL SF 100 $8.00 800.00$ $15.00 1,500.00$ $21.00 2,100.00$ $15.00 1,500.00$ 1-B26 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED STREET IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ 1,926,557.55$ 2,127,025.71$ 1,979,365.80$ 1,791,256.00$ NO BID 1-C1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART C)LS 1 $16,500.00 16,500.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $17,000.00 17,000.00$ $20,000.00 20,000.00$ 1-C2 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (24 IN)LF 24 $215.00 5,160.00$ $150.00 3,600.00$ $160.00 3,840.00$ $170.00 4,080.00$ 1-C3 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (36 IN)LF 47 $279.00 13,113.00$ $372.00 17,484.00$ $400.00 18,800.00$ $415.00 19,505.00$ 1-C4 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (48 IN)LF 23 $500.00 11,500.00$ $600.00 13,800.00$ $650.00 14,950.00$ $674.00 15,502.00$ 1-C5 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (2") LF 425 $10.00 4,250.00$ $19.20 8,160.00$ $20.00 8,500.00$ $22.00 9,350.00$ SUBTOTAL PART B - STREET IMPROVEMENTS PART C - TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Page 2 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 1-C6 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (4") LF 441 $21.00 9,261.00$ $24.00 10,584.00$ $25.00 11,025.00$ $26.50 11,686.50$ 1-C7 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (2") (BORE)LF 263 $23.00 6,049.00$ $24.00 6,312.00$ $25.00 6,575.00$ $26.50 6,969.50$ 1-C8 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (4") (BORE)LF 525 $29.00 15,225.00$ $38.40 20,160.00$ $41.00 21,525.00$ $44.00 23,100.00$ 1-C9 2 CONDR (NO. 12) WITH GROUND (LUMINAIRE WIRE)LF 704 $1.00 704.00$ $2.16 1,520.64$ $2.00 1,408.00$ $2.50 1,760.00$ 1-C10 ELEC CONDR (NO. 6) BARE LF 37 $1.00 37.00$ $6.00 222.00$ $6.00 222.00$ $6.75 249.75$ 1-C11 ELEC CONDR (NO. 6) INSULATED LF 74 $1.50 111.00$ $6.00 444.00$ $6.00 444.00$ $6.75 499.50$ 1-C12 ELEC CONDR (NO. 8) BARE LF 1512 $1.50 2,268.00$ $2.04 3,084.48$ $2.00 3,024.00$ $2.25 3,402.00$ 1-C13 TRAY CABLE (3 CONDR) (12 AWG)LF 1317 $2.15 2,831.55$ $2.16 2,844.72$ $2.00 2,634.00$ $2.50 3,292.50$ 1-C14 TRAY CABLE (3 CONDR) (14 AWG)LF 875 $2.50 2,187.50$ $2.28 1,995.00$ $2.00 1,750.00$ $2.50 2,187.50$ 1-C15 GROUND BOX TY D WITH APRON EA 10 $1,240.00 12,400.00$ $1,320.00 13,200.00$ $1,400.00 14,000.00$ $1,485.00 14,850.00$ 1-C16 INSTALL HWY TRF SIG (ISOLATED)EA 1 $8,760.00 8,760.00$ $3,840.00 3,840.00$ $4,000.00 4,000.00$ $4,360.00 4,360.00$ 1-C17 ELC SRV TY D 120/240 060 (NS)SS(E)PS(U)EA 1 $8,100.00 8,100.00$ $6,960.00 6,960.00$ $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $7,825.00 7,825.00$ 1-C18 ILSN (LED) 8S (DURALIGHT) (FIXED MOUNT)EA 4 $3,100.00 12,400.00$ $3,540.00 14,160.00$ $3,800.00 15,200.00$ $4,000.00 16,000.00$ 1-C19 REMOVING TRAFFIC SIGNALS EA 1 $3,600.00 3,600.00$ $3,000.00 3,000.00$ $4,600.00 4,600.00$ $3,400.00 3,400.00$ 1-C20 LOUVERED VACUUM FORMED ABS BACK PLATE (12")(3 SEC)EA 8 $120.00 960.00$ $102.00 816.00$ $100.00 800.00$ $120.00 960.00$ 1-C21 LOUVERED VACUUM FORMED ABS BACK PLATE (12")(4 SEC)EA 3 $147.00 441.00$ $132.00 396.00$ $140.00 420.00$ $150.00 450.00$ 1-C22 DURALIGHT COUNTDOWN PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL MODULE (16 INCH)EA 8 $602.00 4,816.00$ $570.00 4,560.00$ $600.00 4,800.00$ $640.00 5,120.00$ 1-C23 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (12 AWG) (4 CONDR) LF 294 $1.25 367.50$ $2.04 599.76$ $2.00 588.00$ $2.25 661.50$ 1-C24 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (5 CONDR) LF 327 $1.65 539.55$ $2.28 745.56$ $2.00 654.00$ $2.50 817.50$ 1-C25 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (7 CONDR) LF 237 $1.65 391.05$ $2.34 554.58$ $2.50 592.50$ $2.75 651.75$ 1-C26 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (16 CONDR) LF 698 $3.00 2,094.00$ $5.04 3,517.92$ $5.00 3,490.00$ $5.50 3,839.00$ 1-C27 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (24') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $9,000.00 9,000.00$ $9,720.00 9,720.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $11,000.00 11,000.00$ 1-C28 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (32') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $9,560.00 9,560.00$ $10,620.00 10,620.00$ $11,000.00 11,000.00$ $12,000.00 12,000.00$ 1-C29 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (44') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $10,830.00 10,830.00$ $13,536.00 13,536.00$ $14,000.00 14,000.00$ $15,350.00 15,350.00$ 1-C30 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (60') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $23,410.00 23,410.00$ $23,616.00 23,616.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $26,800.00 26,800.00$ 1-C31 PED POLE ASSEMBLY EA 4 $1,345.00 5,380.00$ $1,170.00 4,680.00$ $1,200.00 4,800.00$ $1,325.00 5,300.00$ 1-C32 POLARA PUSH BUTTON (APS) W/R10-3E SIGN EA 8 $815.00 6,520.00$ $852.00 6,816.00$ $900.00 7,200.00$ $970.00 7,760.00$ 1-C33 PED DETECTOR CONTROLLER UNIT EA 1 $4,100.00 4,100.00$ $4,560.00 4,560.00$ $4,500.00 4,500.00$ $5,175.00 5,175.00$ Page 3 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 1-C34 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (GRN) EA 8 $247.00 1,976.00$ $294.00 2,352.00$ $300.00 2,400.00$ $335.00 2,680.00$ 1-C35 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (GRN ARW) EA 3 $247.00 741.00$ $294.00 882.00$ $300.00 900.00$ $335.00 1,005.00$ 1-C36 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (YEL) EA 8 $247.00 1,976.00$ $294.00 2,352.00$ $300.00 2,400.00$ $335.00 2,680.00$ 1-C37 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (YEL ARW) EA 6 $247.00 1,482.00$ $294.00 1,764.00$ $300.00 1,800.00$ $335.00 2,010.00$ 1-C38 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (RED) EA 8 $247.00 1,976.00$ $294.00 2,352.00$ $300.00 2,400.00$ $335.00 2,680.00$ 1-C39 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (RED ARW) EA 3 $247.00 741.00$ $294.00 882.00$ $300.00 900.00$ $335.00 1,005.00$ 1-C40 ALPHA FXM 2000 UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY WITH CABINET EA 1 $7,850.00 7,850.00$ $19,440.00 19,440.00$ $8,000.00 8,000.00$ $8,500.00 8,500.00$ 1-C41 RADAR PRESENCE DETECTOR (WAVETRONIX) EA 4 $5,365.00 21,460.00$ $7,320.00 29,280.00$ $7,900.00 31,600.00$ $8,300.00 33,200.00$ 1-C42 RADAR PRESENCE DETECTOR COMM & POWER CABLE (SMARTSENSOR 6/C)LF 782 $4.00 3,128.00$ $3.60 2,815.20$ $3.80 2,971.60$ $4.00 3,128.00$ 1-C43 SCHOOL ZONE FLASHER ASSEMBLY (REMOVE AND REPLACE)EA 2 $8,500.00 17,000.00$ $6,120.00 12,240.00$ $6,500.00 13,000.00$ $6,950.00 13,900.00$ 1-C44 CAMERA PTZ (PELCO SPECTRA ENHANCED SERIES) WITH PELCO PA402 MOUNT EA 1 $4,500.00 4,500.00$ $4,308.00 4,308.00$ $4,600.00 4,600.00$ $4,900.00 4,900.00$ 1-C45 ETHERNET CABLE CAT5E FOR PTZ LF 184 $3.30 607.20$ $15.78 2,903.52$ $6.00 1,104.00$ $7.00 1,288.00$ 1-C46 WAVETRONIX CLICK 656 CABINET INTERFACE DEVICE EA 1 $4,900.00 4,900.00$ $4,680.00 4,680.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $5,300.00 5,300.00$ 1-C47 DATA AGGREGATOR DA-400, POWER/COMM CABLE AND 5-BAND ANTENNA EA 1 $5,400.00 5,400.00$ $6,804.00 6,804.00$ $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $7,700.00 7,700.00$ 1-C48 MAST ARM DAMPING PLATE EA 1 $269.00 269.00$ $660.00 660.00$ $700.00 700.00$ $750.00 750.00$ 1-C49 CONTROLLER CABINET (TS-2) WITH EXTENSION EA 1 $13,800.00 13,800.00$ $15,564.00 15,564.00$ $13,000.00 13,000.00$ $14,320.00 14,320.00$ 1-C50 NEMA TYPE CONTROLLER FOUNDATION EA 1 $3,500.00 3,500.00$ $2,520.00 2,520.00$ $2,700.00 2,700.00$ $2,860.00 2,860.00$ 1-C51 CONTROLLER ECONOLITE COBALT EA 1 $3,900.00 3,900.00$ $4,230.00 4,230.00$ $4,600.00 4,600.00$ $4,800.00 4,800.00$ 1-C52 MMU2-16LEIP WITH ETHERNET PORT EA 1 $1,140.00 1,140.00$ $1,482.00 1,482.00$ $1,500.00 1,500.00$ $1,680.00 1,680.00$ 1-C53 CISCO ETHERNET 4000 SWITCH (IE-4000-8GT8GP4G- E) AND POWER SUPPLY (PWR-IE170W-PC-AC=)EA 1 $8,500.00 8,500.00$ $9,960.00 9,960.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $11,250.00 11,250.00$ 1-C54 MIMOSA-B5 BACKHAUL RADIO EA 1 $7,000.00 7,000.00$ $3,720.00 3,720.00$ $4,000.00 4,000.00$ $4,200.00 4,200.00$ 1-C55 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION (2 INTERSECTIONS)LS 1 $65,000.00 65,000.00$ $7,800.00 7,800.00$ $8,400.00 8,400.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 1-C56 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ $5,000.00 5,000.00$ Page 4 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 394,712.35$ 365,099.38$ 378,317.10$ 408,740.00$ NO BID 1-D1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART D)LS 1 $621.00 621.00$ $2,400.00 2,400.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $3,500.00 3,500.00$ 1-D2 CONCRETE BUS SHELTER PAD SF 900 $6.75 6,075.00$ $15.60 14,040.00$ $17.00 15,300.00$ $40.00 36,000.00$ 1-D3 CONCRETE BUS PAD (IN STREET)SY 200 $68.00 13,600.00$ $170.40 34,080.00$ $170.00 34,000.00$ $350.00 70,000.00$ 1-D4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED RTA IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 21,296.00$ 51,520.00$ 52,300.00$ 110,500.00$ NO BID 1-E1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART E)LS 1 $5,015.00 5,015.00$ $2,815.20 2,815.20$ $12,000.00 12,000.00$ $5,500.00 5,500.00$ 1-E2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 15,308 $6.25 95,675.00$ $9.00 137,772.00$ $8.00 122,464.00$ $12.00 183,696.00$ 1-E3 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 263 $35.00 9,205.00$ $28.80 7,574.40$ $54.00 14,202.00$ $75.00 19,725.00$ 1-E4 CONCRETE CURB RAMPS SF 4,167 $8.70 36,252.90$ $21.00 87,507.00$ $28.00 116,676.00$ $31.00 129,177.00$ 1-E5 SIDEWALK RETAINING CURB LF 50 $25.00 1,250.00$ $46.46 2,323.00$ $65.00 3,250.00$ $94.00 4,700.00$ 1-E6 SIDEWALK DRAIN LF 50 $100.00 5,000.00$ $168.00 8,400.00$ $200.00 10,000.00$ $1,150.00 57,500.00$ 1-E7 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (24") (SOLID) - CROSSWALK LF 959 $18.00 17,262.00$ $12.00 11,508.00$ $12.00 11,508.00$ $13.00 12,467.00$ 1-E8 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED ADA IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ 172,159.90$ 260,399.60$ 292,600.00$ 415,265.00$ NO BID 1-F1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART F)LS 1 $21,326.00 21,326.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $40,000.00 40,000.00$ $40,218.00 40,218.00$ 1-F2 REMOVE EXISTING INLET OR MANHOLE EA 1 $800.00 800.00$ $3,000.00 3,000.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $5,300.00 5,300.00$ 1-F3 5' DIAMETER CONCRETE MANHOLE (TYPE-A) (CAST IN PLACE)EA 4 $4,500.00 18,000.00$ $9,036.00 36,144.00$ $8,000.00 32,000.00$ $14,775.00 59,100.00$ 1-F4 6' DIAMETER CONCRETE MANHOLE (TYPE-A) (CAST IN PLACE)EA 3 $6,000.00 18,000.00$ $12,002.40 36,007.20$ $9,000.00 27,000.00$ $14,850.00 44,550.00$ 1-F5 REMOVE EXISTING REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (15" - 36")LF 437 $25.00 10,925.00$ $56.00 24,472.00$ $39.00 17,043.00$ $69.00 30,153.00$ 1-F6 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 5,073 $18.00 91,314.00$ $25.35 128,600.55$ $23.00 116,679.00$ $33.00 167,409.00$ 1-F7 6' CONCRETE CURB INLET (CAST IN PLACE)EA 9 $7,800.00 70,200.00$ $5,160.00 46,440.00$ $9,000.00 81,000.00$ $10,910.00 98,190.00$ 1-F8 5' CONCRETE CURB INLET THROAT EXTENSION EA 28 $4,500.00 126,000.00$ $2,110.08 59,082.24$ $2,000.00 56,000.00$ $13,010.00 364,280.00$ 1-F9 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 5' CURB INLET TOP (CAST IN PLACE)EA 9 $4,000.00 36,000.00$ $4,920.00 44,280.00$ $3,000.00 27,000.00$ $6,250.00 56,250.00$ 1-F10 18" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 292 $79.00 23,068.00$ $143.84 42,001.28$ $166.00 48,472.00$ $200.00 58,400.00$ PART D - RTA IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART D - RTA IMPROVEMENTS PART E - ADA IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART E - ADA IMPROVEMENTS PART F - STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART C - TRAFFIC SIGNALS IMPR Page 5 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 1-F11 24" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 70 $86.00 6,020.00$ $173.95 12,176.50$ $190.00 13,300.00$ $200.00 14,000.00$ 1-F12 36" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 1,186 $133.00 157,738.00$ $203.99 241,932.14$ $220.00 260,920.00$ $210.00 249,060.00$ 1-F13 42" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III)LF 801 $162.00 129,762.00$ $240.90 192,960.90$ $250.00 200,250.00$ $270.00 216,270.00$ 1-F14 TRENCH SAFETY (STORM WATER INLETS OR MANHOLES)EA 13 $300.00 3,900.00$ $600.00 7,800.00$ $650.00 8,450.00$ $1,525.00 19,825.00$ 1-F15 TRENCH SAFETY (STORM WATER LINE)LF 2,349 $1.75 4,110.75$ $6.00 14,094.00$ $6.00 14,094.00$ $24.50 57,550.50$ 1-F16 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ 732,163.75$ 928,990.81$ 959,208.00$ 1,495,555.50$ NO BID 1-G1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART G)LS 1 $12,697.00 12,697.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ $25,000.00 25,000.00$ 1-G2 8" PVC C900 WATERLINE LF 2,578 $44.00 113,432.00$ $84.25 217,196.50$ $93.00 239,754.00$ $93.50 241,043.00$ 1-G3 8" DI WATERLINE LF 170 $89.00 15,130.00$ $149.54 25,421.80$ $280.00 47,600.00$ $168.00 28,560.00$ 1-G4 10" PVC C900 WATERLINE LF 64 $55.00 3,520.00$ $164.18 10,507.52$ $175.00 11,200.00$ $152.00 9,728.00$ 1-G5 6" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 1 $1,575.00 1,575.00$ $1,002.00 1,002.00$ $1,500.00 1,500.00$ $1,395.00 1,395.00$ 1-G6 8" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,920.00 3,840.00$ $1,393.20 2,786.40$ $1,900.00 3,800.00$ $1,555.00 3,110.00$ 1-G7 10" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 2 $2,500.00 5,000.00$ $2,034.00 4,068.00$ $3,200.00 6,400.00$ $2,320.00 4,640.00$ 1-G8 16" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 1 $5,500.00 5,500.00$ $9,000.00 9,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $13,440.00 13,440.00$ 1-G9 8" 45° DIMJ BEND EA 55 $165.00 9,075.00$ $333.60 18,348.00$ $350.00 19,250.00$ $335.00 18,425.00$ 1-G10 10" 45° DIMJ BEND EA 2 $305.00 610.00$ $405.60 811.20$ $400.00 800.00$ $600.00 1,200.00$ 1-G11 8" WATER VALVE EA 18 $1,920.00 34,560.00$ $1,510.80 27,194.40$ $1,900.00 34,200.00$ $1,555.00 27,990.00$ 1-G12 10" WATER VALVE EA 1 $2,520.00 2,520.00$ $2,700.00 2,700.00$ $3,200.00 3,200.00$ $2,300.00 2,300.00$ 1-G13 8" DIMJ ELBOW EA 2 $165.00 330.00$ $585.60 1,171.20$ $600.00 1,200.00$ $725.00 1,450.00$ 1-G14 8" X 8" DIMJ CROSS RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,400.00 2,800.00$ $482.28 964.56$ $500.00 1,000.00$ $600.00 1,200.00$ 1-G15 8" X 6" DIMJ TEE EA 18 $210.00 3,780.00$ $451.20 8,121.60$ $250.00 4,500.00$ $500.00 9,000.00$ 1-G16 8" X 6 " DIMJ REDUCER EA 3 $450.00 1,350.00$ $412.80 1,238.40$ $200.00 600.00$ $300.00 900.00$ 1-G17 8" X 8" DIMJ TEE EA 3 $264.00 792.00$ $468.00 1,404.00$ $500.00 1,500.00$ $750.00 2,250.00$ 1-G18 8" X 10" DIMJ TEE EA 1 $440.00 440.00$ $720.00 720.00$ $900.00 900.00$ $925.00 925.00$ 1-G19 6" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,200.00 2,400.00$ $1,386.00 2,772.00$ $2,000.00 4,000.00$ $1,550.00 3,100.00$ 1-G20 8" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 6 $1,800.00 10,800.00$ $1,422.00 8,532.00$ $2,000.00 12,000.00$ $1,550.00 9,300.00$ 1-G21 10" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 1 $2,200.00 2,200.00$ $2,346.00 2,346.00$ $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $1,600.00 1,600.00$ SUBTOTAL PART F - STORM WATER IMPR PART G - WATER IMPROVEMENTS Page 6 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 1-G22 8" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE EA 1 $3,542.00 3,542.00$ $4,980.00 4,980.00$ $16,000.00 16,000.00$ $13,900.00 13,900.00$ 1-G23 16" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE EA 1 $4,800.00 4,800.00$ $8,000.00 8,000.00$ $17,000.00 17,000.00$ $15,000.00 15,000.00$ 1-G24 6" PLUG EA 3 $500.00 1,500.00$ $270.00 810.00$ $200.00 600.00$ $500.00 1,500.00$ 1-G25 8" PLUG EA 5 $650.00 3,250.00$ $300.00 1,500.00$ $200.00 1,000.00$ $600.00 3,000.00$ 1-G26 10" PLUG EA 1 $800.00 800.00$ $594.00 594.00$ $300.00 300.00$ $850.00 850.00$ 1-G27 NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (TYPE 1)EA 18 $5,100.00 91,800.00$ $4,405.20 79,293.60$ $6,000.00 108,000.00$ $5,900.00 106,200.00$ 1-G28 REPLACE EXISTING WATER SERVICE WITH NEW WATER SERVICE LINE W/CONNECTION EA 9 $2,800.00 25,200.00$ $2,750.40 24,753.60$ $2,500.00 22,500.00$ $1,300.00 11,700.00$ 1-G29 1" WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (INCLUDING METER ASSEMBLY AND METER BOX)EA 9 $2,800.00 25,200.00$ $2,084.40 18,759.60$ $1,200.00 10,800.00$ $1,500.00 13,500.00$ 1-G30 CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER LINE EA 12 $2,800.00 33,600.00$ $1,431.60 17,179.20$ $1,000.00 12,000.00$ $1,450.00 17,400.00$ 1-G31 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WATER LINES LF 2,578 $1.50 3,867.00$ $2.40 6,187.20$ $3.00 7,734.00$ $4.50 11,601.00$ 1-G32 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED WATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 435,910.00$ 543,362.78$ 641,338.00$ 611,207.00$ NO BID 1-H1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART H)LS 1 $13,038.00 13,038.00$ $22,000.00 22,000.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ $30,000.00 30,000.00$ 1-H2 4' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (6' DEPTH OR LESS) (FIBERGLASS)EA 9 $8,000.00 72,000.00$ $6,884.40 61,959.60$ $9,000.00 81,000.00$ $14,900.00 134,100.00$ 1-H3 EXTRA DEPTH FOR 4' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (OVER 6' DEPTH) (FIBERGLASS)VF 35 $250.00 8,750.00$ $768.00 26,880.00$ $1,300.00 45,500.00$ $1,000.00 35,000.00$ 1-H4 EXTRA DEPTH FOR 5' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (OVER 6' DEPTH) (FIBERGLASS)VF 5 $275.00 1,375.00$ $908.40 4,542.00$ $1,500.00 7,500.00$ $1,200.00 6,000.00$ 1-H5 5' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (6' DEPTH OR LESS) (FIBERGLASS)EA 1 $12,500.00 12,500.00$ $13,990.80 13,990.80$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $19,000.00 19,000.00$ 1-H6 ADJUST EXISTING WASTEWATER MANHOLE RIM TO GRADE EA 1 $800.00 800.00$ $2,022.00 2,022.00$ $2,500.00 2,500.00$ $4,700.00 4,700.00$ 1-H7 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (0' - 6' DEPTH)LF 9 $44.00 396.00$ $74.58 671.22$ $150.00 1,350.00$ $150.00 1,350.00$ 1-H8 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (6' - 8' DEPTH)LF 288 $46.00 13,248.00$ $90.18 25,971.84$ $160.00 46,080.00$ $155.00 44,640.00$ 1-H9 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (8' - 10' DEPTH)LF 324 $48.00 15,552.00$ $116.75 37,827.00$ $185.00 59,940.00$ $158.00 51,192.00$ 1-H10 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (10' - 12' DEPTH)LF 75 $50.00 3,750.00$ $156.18 11,713.50$ $220.00 16,500.00$ $160.00 12,000.00$ 1-H11 10" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (8' - 10' DEPTH)LF 503 $65.00 32,695.00$ $132.21 66,501.63$ $200.00 100,600.00$ $160.00 80,480.00$ PART H - WASTEWTR IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART G - WATER IMPROVEMENTS Page 7 of 8 PROJ. NO. 18027A ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT UNIT PR AMOUNT LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD TO PALM DR 1110 Navasota Ridge Rd 6229 Leopard St 1901 Hollister Navasota, TX 77868 CC, TX 78409 Houston, TX 77080 7505 UpRiver Rd CC, TX 78409 401 Corn Products Rd CC, TX 78409 RFB 3303 Burnside Services, Inc.Clark Pipeline Services Reytec Constr ResourcesJE Construction Services Bay Ltd 1-H12 10" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (10' - 12' DEPTH)LF 655 $70.00 45,850.00$ $165.64 108,494.20$ $210.00 137,550.00$ $162.00 106,110.00$ 1-H13 GROUT FILL (8" - 10") VCP WASTEWATER LINE LF 1468 $68.00 99,824.00$ $15.60 22,900.80$ $15.00 22,020.00$ $35.00 51,380.00$ 1-H14 SHORT WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE (INCLUDES NEW SERVICE LINE, CLEANOUT, AND CONNECTION)EA 6 $12,000.00 72,000.00$ $2,425.20 14,551.20$ $7,000.00 42,000.00$ $5,150.00 30,900.00$ 1-H15 LONG WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE (INCLUDES NEW SERVICE LINE, CLEANOUT, AND CONNECTION)EA 3 $15,000.00 45,000.00$ $4,305.60 12,916.80$ $12,000.00 36,000.00$ $7,250.00 21,750.00$ 1-H16 DROP CONNECTION AT MANHOLE EA 1 $4,820.00 4,820.00$ $2,661.60 2,661.60$ $2,300.00 2,300.00$ $4,900.00 4,900.00$ 1-H17 TRENCH SAFETY (WASTEWATER MANHOLES)EA 9 $250.00 2,250.00$ $960.00 8,640.00$ $650.00 5,850.00$ $700.00 6,300.00$ 1-H18 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WASTEWATER MAIN LF 1,854 $1.50 2,781.00$ $9.60 17,798.40$ $7.00 12,978.00$ $8.00 14,832.00$ 1-H19 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ $10,000.00 10,000.00$ 456,629.00$ 472,042.59$ 669,668.00$ 664,634.00$ NO BID -$ 1-I1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART I)LS 1 $2,741.00 2,741.00$ $4,500.00 4,500.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $3,000.00 3,000.00$ 1-I2 EXCAVATION, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION OF GAS LINES LF 5,423 $15.00 81,345.00$ $16.80 91,106.40$ $5.00 27,115.00$ $12.00 65,076.00$ 1-I3 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE BOX TO FINISHED GRADE EA 2 $4,500.00 9,000.00$ $888.00 1,776.00$ $700.00 1,400.00$ $800.00 1,600.00$ 1-I4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED GAS IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 94,086.00$ 98,382.40$ 30,515.00$ 70,676.00$ NO BID 1-J1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART J)LS 1 $1,264.00 1,264.00$ $3,000.00 3,000.00$ $3,000.00 3,000.00$ $3,500.00 3,500.00$ 1-J2 2" PVC SCHEDULE 40 I.T. CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING AND MULE TAPE LF 2,486 $13.00 32,318.00$ $12.00 29,832.00$ $13.00 32,318.00$ $13.00 32,318.00$ 1-J3 24"X36"X18" I.T. PULL BOX (INSTALLATION ONLY)EA 14 $650.00 9,100.00$ $2,244.00 31,416.00$ $2,500.00 35,000.00$ $2,500.00 35,000.00$ 1-J4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED I.T. IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 43,682.00$ 65,248.00$ 71,318.00$ 71,818.00$ 4,606,359.05$ 5,262,457.37$ 5,533,812.90$ 6,299,999.00$ NO BIDTOTAL BASE BID 1 HMAC - (PARTS A THRU J) SUBTOTAL PART H - WASTEWTR IMPR PART I - GAS IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART I - GAS IMPROVEMENTS PART J - I.T. IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL PART J - I.T. IMPROVEMENTS Page 8 of 8 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACTS AND PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT LEOPARD STREET NUECES BAY BOULEVARD TO PALM DRIVE PROJ. NO. 18027A CONTRACT NO. 3303 Project Specifications and Drawings available at: Y:\00 LEGISTAR CONST PLANS SPECS\Item No 20- 0105 Leopard St Nueces Bay to Palm Agreement 00 52 23 - 1 Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) (Project No. 18027A) Rev 7/2020 00 52 23 AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the City of Corpus Christi (Owner) and CPC Interests LLC DBA Clark Pipeline Services LLC (Contractor). Owner and Contractor agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 – WORK 1.01 Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as: Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) 18027A ARTICLE 2 – DESIGNER AND OWNER’S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 2.01 The Project has been designed by: HDR Engineering, Inc. 555 N Carancahua St, Suite 1600 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Samuel.saldivar@hdrinc.com 2.02 The Owner’s Authorized Representative for this Project is: Brett Van Hazel, PMP – Asst. Director of Construction City of Corpus Christi – Engineering Services 4917 Holly Road, Bldg. #5 Corpus Christi, TX 78411 ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT TIMES 3.01 Contract Times A. The Work is required to be substantially completed within 395 days after the date when the Contract Times commence to run as provided in the Notice to Proceed and is to be completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 17.16 of the General Conditions within 425 days after the date when the Contract Times commence to run. DocuSign Envelope ID: A1E73A24-856A-4E55-B0A5-C094162C2F67 Agreement 00 52 23 - 2 Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) (Project No. 18027A) Rev 7/2020 B. Performance of the Work is required as shown in Paragraph 7.02 of the General Conditions. C. Milestones, and the dates for completion of each, are as defined in Section 01 35 00 SPECIAL PROCEDURES. 3.02 Liquidated Damages A. Owner and Contractor recognize that time limits for specified Milestones, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness for Final Payment as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract. Owner and Contractor recognize that the Owner will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraph 3.01 and as adjusted in accordance with Paragraph 11.05 of the General Conditions. Owner and Contractor also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by Owner if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty): 1. Substantial Completion: Contractor shall pay Owner $1,500.00 for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.01 for Substantial Completion until the Work is substantially complete. 2. Completion of the Remaining Work: Contractor agrees to pay Owner $800.00 for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.01 for completion and readiness for final payment until the Work is completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 17.16 of the General Conditions. 3. Liquidated damages for failing to timely attain Substantial Completion and Final Completion are not additive and will not be imposed concurrently. 4. Milestones: Contractor agrees to pay Owner liquidated damages as stipulated in SECTION 01 35 00 SPECIAL PROCEDURES for failure to meet Milestone completions. 5. The Owner will determine whether the Work has been completed within the Contract Times. B. Owner is not required to only assess liquidated damages, and Owner may elect to pursue its actual damages resulting from the failure of Contractor to complete the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 4 – CONTRACT PRICE 4.01 Owner will pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents at the unit prices shown in the attached BID FORM. Unit prices have been computed in accordance with Paragraph 15.03 of the General Conditions. Contractor acknowledges that estimated quantities are not guaranteed, and were solely for the purpose of comparing Bids, and final payment for all unit price items will be based on actual quantities, determined as provided in the Contract Documents. Total Base Bid Price Base Bid 1 (HMAC) $ 5,262,457.37 DocuSign Envelope ID: A1E73A24-856A-4E55-B0A5-C094162C2F67 Agreement 00 52 23 - 3 Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) (Project No. 18027A) Rev 7/2020 ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENT PROCEDURES 5.01 Submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article 17 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by the OAR as provided in the General Conditions. 5.02 Progress Payments; Retainage: A. The Owner will make progress payments on or about the 25th day of each month during performance of the Work. Payment is based on Work completed in accordance with the Schedule of Values established as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress payments equal to the full amount of the total earned value to date for completed Work minus the retainage listed below and properly stored materials will be made prior to Substantial Completion. 1. The standard retainage is 5 percent. C. Payment will be made for the amount determined per Paragraph 5.02.B, less the total of payments previously made and less set-offs determined in accordance with Paragraph 17.01 of the General Conditions. D. At the Owner’s option, retainage may be increased to a higher percentage rate, not to exceed ten percent, if progress on the Project is considered to be unsatisfactory. If retainage in excess of the amount described above is held prior to Substantial Completion, the Owner will place the additional amount in an interest bearing account. Interest will be paid in accordance with Paragraph 6.01. E. At the Owner’s option, Owner may pay Contractor 100 percent of the Work completed, less amounts withheld in accordance with Paragraph 17.01 of the General Conditions and less 200 percent of OAR’s estimate of the value of Work to be completed or corrected to reach Substantial Completion. Owner may, at its sole discretion, elect to hold retainage in the amounts set forth above for progress payments prior to Substantial Completion if Owner has concerns with the ability of the Contractor to complete the remaining Work in accordance with the Contract Documents or within the time frame established by this Agreement. Release or reduction in retainage is contingent upon and consent of surety to the reduction in retainage. 5.03 Owner will pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by OAR in accordance with Paragraph 17.16 of the General Conditions upon Final Completion and acceptance of the Work. ARTICLE 6 – INTEREST ON OVERDUE PAYMENTS AND RETAINAGE 6.01 The Owner is not obligated to pay interest on overdue payments except as required by Texas Government Code Chapter 2251. Invoices must comply with Article 17 of the General Conditions. 6.02 Except as specified in Article 5, the Owner is not obligated to pay interest on moneys not paid except as provided in Texas Government Code Chapter 2252. DocuSign Envelope ID: A1E73A24-856A-4E55-B0A5-C094162C2F67 Agreement 00 52 23 - 4 Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) (Project No. 18027A) Rev 7/2020 ARTICLE 7 – CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS 7.01 The Contractor makes the following representations: A. The Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and the other related data identified in the Bidding Documents. B. The Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. The Contractor is familiar with Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. The Contractor has carefully studied the following Site-related reports and drawings as identified in the Supplementary Conditions: 1. Geotechnical Data Reports regarding subsurface conditions at or adjacent to the Site; 2. Drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site; 3. Underground Facilities referenced in reports and drawings; 4. Reports and drawings relating to Hazardous Environmental Conditions, if any, at or adjacent to the Site; and 5. Technical Data related to each of these reports and drawings. E. The Contractor has considered the: 1. Information known to Contractor; 2. Information commonly known to contractors doing business in the locality of the Site; 3. Information and observations obtained from visits to the Site; and 4. The Contract Documents. F. The Contractor has considered the items identified in Paragraphs 7.01.D and 7.01.E with respect to the effect of such information, observations, and documents on: 1. The cost, progress, and performance of the Work; 2. The means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor; and 3. Contractor’s safety precautions and programs. G. Based on the information and observations referred to in the preceding paragraphs, Contractor agrees that no further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. H. The Contractor is aware of the general nature of Work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. I. The Contractor has correlated the information known to the Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract DocuSign Envelope ID: A1E73A24-856A-4E55-B0A5-C094162C2F67 Agreement 00 52 23 - 5 Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) (Project No. 18027A) Rev 7/2020 Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. J. The Contractor has given the OAR written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that the Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution provided by the OAR is acceptable to the Contractor. K. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. L. Contractor’s entry into this Contract constitutes an incontrovertible representation by Contractor that without exception all prices in the Agreement are premised upon performing and furnishing the Work required by the Contract Documents. M. CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE OWNER’S INDEMNITEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7.14 OF THE GENERAL CONDITIONS AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS. ARTICLE 8 – ACCOUNTING RECORDS 8.01 Accounting Record Availability: The Contractor shall keep such full and detailed accounts of materials incorporated and labor and equipment utilized for the Work consistent with the requirements of Paragraph 15.01 of the General Conditions and as may be necessary for proper financial management under this Agreement. Subject to prior written notice, the Owner shall be afforded reasonable access during normal business hours to all of the Contractor’s records, books, correspondence, instructions, drawings, receipts, vouchers, memoranda, and similar data relating to the Cost of the Work and the Contractor’s fee. The Contractor shall preserve all such documents for a period of 3 years after the final payment by the Owner. ARTICLE 9 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 9.01 Contents: A. The Contract Documents consist of the following: 1. Exhibits to this Agreement: a. Contractor’s Bid Form. 2. Specifications, forms, and documents listed in SECTION 00 01 00 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 3. Drawings listed in the Sheet Index. 4. Solicitation documents and Contractor’s response, which are incorporated by reference. 5. Addenda, which are incorporated by reference. 6. Documentation required by the Contract Documents and submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award, which is incorporated by reference. B. There are no Contract Documents other than those listed above in this Article. C. The Contract Documents may only be amended, modified, or supplemented as provided in Article 11 of the General Conditions. DocuSign Envelope ID: A1E73A24-856A-4E55-B0A5-C094162C2F67 Agreement 00 52 23 - 6 Leopard St. – Nueces Bay Blvd. to Palm Dr. (Bond 2018) (Project No. 18027A) Rev 7/2020 ARTICLE 10 – CONTRACT DOCUMENT SIGNATURES ATTEST CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Michael Rodriguez Chief of Staff __________________________ AUTHORIZED APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BY COUNCIL ___________________________ Assistant City Attorney ATTEST (IF CORPORATION) CONTRACTOR CPC Interests LLC DBA Clark Pipeline Services LLC (Seal Below) By: Note: Attach copy of authorization to sign if person signing for CONTRACTOR is not President, Vice President, Chief Executive Officer, or Chief Financial Officer Title: 6229 Leopard Street Address Corpus Christi, TX 78409 City State Zip 361/929-5822 Phone Fax npatel@clarkpipeline.com EMail END OF SECTION DocuSign Envelope ID: A1E73A24-856A-4E55-B0A5-C094162C2F67 President 12/11/2020 PROJECT: LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018) BIDDER: Clark Pipeline Services, LLC TOTAL BID: COMPLETION TIME: Not Required BIDDER INFO: 6229 Leopard Street Corpus Christi,TX 78409 P: 3618166007 F: CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-A2 BONDS AND INSURANCE (AS REQUIRED)AL 1 $52,000.00 $52,000.00 1-A3 CLEAR RIGHT-OF-WAY AC 0.81 $9,000.00 $7,290.00 1-A4 OZONE ACTION DAY EA 5 $420.00 $2,100.00 1-A5 LOW PROFILE CONCRETE BARRIERS EA 62 $750.00 $46,500.00 1-A6 TCP PLAN AND PREP LS 1 $18,600.00 $18,600.00 1-A7 TCP MOBILIZATION/ADJUSTMENTS LS 1 $32,400.00 $32,400.00 1-A8 TCP ITEMS (BARRELS, CONES, ETC.)MONTH 14 $3,733.20 $52,264.80 1-A9 TCP - ELECTRIC MESSAGE BOARDS DAY 20 $810.00 $16,200.00 1-A10 TCP - CROSSING GUARDS DAY 175 $210.00 $36,750.00 1-A11 TCP - PAVEMENT REPAIRS LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 1-A12 TCP - ADJUSTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEADS AL 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1-A13 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN LS 1 $20,880.00 $20,880.00 1-A14 SILT FENCE FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION LF 1794 $4.80 $8,611.20 1-A15 BLOCK SODDING SY 153 $11.70 $1,790.10 Subtotal: $350,386.10 PART B - STREET IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-B1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART B)LS 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 1-B2 STREET EXCAVATION SY 19941 $12.00 $239,292.00 1-B3 TYPE D HOT-MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT (2.5") (INCLUDES TACK COAT) SY 18064 $21.00 $379,344.00 1-B4 TYPE B HOT-MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT (5") SY 18064 $31.50 $569,016.00 1-B5 PRIME COAT (MC-30)GAL 2710 $7.68 $20,812.80 1-B6 7" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE (TY A, GR. 1-2) SY 19941 $25.20 $502,513.20 1-B7 TENSAR TX5 GEOGRID OR EQUAL SY 19941 $5.40 $107,681.40 1-B8 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE SY 19941 $5.08 $101,300.28 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-B9 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (WORD) EA 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 1-B10 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (ARROW) EA 15 $222.00 $3,330.00 1-B11 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (4") (DOT)(090 MIL) LF 33 $0.90 $29.70 1-B12 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (8") (SLD)(090 MIL) LF 550 $1.80 $990.00 1-B13 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (12") (SOLID)(090 MIL) LF 147 $7.20 $1,058.40 1-B14 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (4") (BRK)(090 MIL) LF 1090 $0.90 $981.00 1-B15 TY C HEAT APPLIED PREFAB PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (24") (SLD) (090 MIL) LF 1379 $12.00 $16,548.00 1-B16 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKINGS TY I (Y) 4" (BRK)(090 MIL) LF 660 $0.90 $594.00 1-B17 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE I (Y) (4") (SLD)(090 MIL) LF 4829 $0.90 $4,346.10 1-B18 TY I-C RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTORIZED) EA 62 $6.00 $372.00 1-B19 TY-II-A-A RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTORIZED) EA 255 $6.00 $1,530.00 1-B20 REMOVE EXISTING STREET SIGNS AND ASSEMBLIES EA 29 $102.00 $2,958.00 1-B21 IN SM RD SN SUP & AM TY 10BWG (1)SA(P) EA 25 $990.00 $24,750.00 1-B22 IN SM RD SN SUP & AM TY 10BWG (1)SA(P-BM) EA 9 $1,170.00 $10,530.00 1-B23 CONCRETE MEDIAN CAP SF 5053 $9.60 $48,508.80 1-B24 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 1259 $14.17 $17,840.03 1-B25 UNANTICIPATED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REMOVAL SF 100 $15.00 $1,500.00 1-B26 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED STREET IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Subtotal: $2,127,025.71 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM PART C - TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-C1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART C)LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1-C2 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (24 IN)LF 24 $150.00 $3,600.00 1-C3 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (36 IN)LF 47 $372.00 $17,484.00 1-C4 DRILL SHAFT (TRF SIG POLE) (48 IN)LF 23 $600.00 $13,800.00 1-C5 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (2") LF 425 $19.20 $8,160.00 1-C6 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (4") LF 441 $24.00 $10,584.00 1-C7 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (2") (BORE)LF 263 $24.00 $6,312.00 1-C8 CONDT (PVC) (SCHD 40) (4") (BORE)LF 525 $38.40 $20,160.00 1-C9 2 CONDR (NO. 12) WITH GROUND (LUMINAIRE WIRE) LF 704 $2.16 $1,520.64 1-C10 ELEC CONDR (NO. 6) BARE LF 37 $6.00 $222.00 1-C11 ELEC CONDR (NO. 6) INSULATED LF 74 $6.00 $444.00 1-C12 ELEC CONDR (NO. 8) BARE LF 1512 $2.04 $3,084.48 1-C13 TRAY CABLE (3 CONDR) (12 AWG)LF 1317 $2.16 $2,844.72 1-C14 TRAY CABLE (3 CONDR) (14 AWG)LF 875 $2.28 $1,995.00 1-C15 GROUND BOX TY D WITH APRON EA 10 $1,320.00 $13,200.00 1-C16 INSTALL HWY TRF SIG (ISOLATED)EA 1 $3,840.00 $3,840.00 1-C17 ELC SRV TY D 120/240 060 (NS)SS(E)PS(U) EA 1 $6,960.00 $6,960.00 1-C18 ILSN (LED) 8S (DURALIGHT) (FIXED MOUNT) EA 4 $3,540.00 $14,160.00 1-C19 REMOVING TRAFFIC SIGNALS EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1-C20 LOUVERED VACUUM FORMED ABS BACK PLATE (12")(3 SEC) EA 8 $102.00 $816.00 1-C21 LOUVERED VACUUM FORMED ABS BACK PLATE (12")(4 SEC) EA 3 $132.00 $396.00 1-C22 DURALIGHT COUNTDOWN PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL MODULE (16 INCH) EA 8 $570.00 $4,560.00 1-C23 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (12 AWG) (4 CONDR) LF 294 $2.04 $599.76 1-C24 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (5 CONDR) LF 327 $2.28 $745.56 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-C25 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (7 CONDR) LF 237 $2.34 $554.58 1-C26 TRF SIG CBL (TY A) (14 AWG) (16 CONDR)LF 698 $5.04 $3,517.92 1-C27 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (24') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $9,720.00 $9,720.00 1-C28 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (32') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $10,620.00 $10,620.00 1-C29 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (44') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $13,536.00 $13,536.00 1-C30 INS TRF SIG PL AM(S)1 ARM (60') LUM & ILSN EA 1 $23,616.00 $23,616.00 1-C31 PED POLE ASSEMBLY EA 4 $1,170.00 $4,680.00 1-C32 POLARA PUSH BUTTON (APS) W/R10-3E SIGN EA 8 $852.00 $6,816.00 1-C33 PED DETECTOR CONTROLLER UNIT EA 1 $4,560.00 $4,560.00 1-C34 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (GRN) EA 8 $294.00 $2,352.00 1-C35 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (GRN ARW) EA 3 $294.00 $882.00 1-C36 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (YEL) EA 8 $294.00 $2,352.00 1-C37 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (YEL ARW) EA 6 $294.00 $1,764.00 1-C38 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (RED) EA 8 $294.00 $2,352.00 1-C39 LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODULE - VEH SIG SEC (12") LED (RED ARW) EA 3 $294.00 $882.00 1-C40 ALPHA FXM 2000 UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY WITH CABINET EA 1 $19,440.00 $19,440.00 1-C41 RADAR PRESENCE DETECTOR (WAVETRONIX) EA 4 $7,320.00 $29,280.00 1-C42 RADAR PRESENCE DETECTOR COMM & POWER CABLE (SMARTSENSOR 6/C) LF 782 $3.60 $2,815.20 1-C43 SCHOOL ZONE FLASHER ASSEMBLY (REMOVE AND REPLACE) EA 2 $6,120.00 $12,240.00 1-C44 CAMERA PTZ (PELCO SPECTRA ENHANCED SERIES) WITH PELCO PA402 MOUNT EA 1 $4,308.00 $4,308.00 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-C45 ETHERNET CABLE CAT5E FOR PTZ LF 184 $15.78 $2,903.52 1-C46 WAVETRONIX CLICK 656 CABINET INTERFACE DEVICE EA 1 $4,680.00 $4,680.00 1-C47 DATA AGGREGATOR DA-400, POWER/COMM CABLE AND 5-BAND ANTENNA EA 1 $6,804.00 $6,804.00 1-C48 MAST ARM DAMPING PLATE EA 1 $660.00 $660.00 1-C49 CONTROLLER CABINET (TS-2) WITH EXTENSION EA 1 $15,564.00 $15,564.00 1-C50 NEMA TYPE CONTROLLER FOUNDATION EA 1 $2,520.00 $2,520.00 1-C51 CONTROLLER ECONOLITE COBALT EA 1 $4,230.00 $4,230.00 1-C52 MMU2-16LEIP WITH ETHERNET PORT EA 1 $1,482.00 $1,482.00 1-C53 CISCO ETHERNET 4000 SWITCH (IE-4000- 8GT8GP4G-E) AND POWER SUPPLY (PWR-IE170W-PC-AC=) EA 1 $9,960.00 $9,960.00 1-C54 MIMOSA-B5 BACKHAUL RADIO EA 1 $3,720.00 $3,720.00 1-C55 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION (2 INTERSECTIONS) LS 1 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 1-C56 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Subtotal: $365,099.38 PART D - RTA IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-D1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART D)LS 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 1-D2 CONCRETE BUS SHELTER PAD SF 900 $15.60 $14,040.00 1-D3 CONCRETE BUS PAD (IN STREET)SY 200 $170.40 $34,080.00 1-D4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED RTA IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Subtotal: $51,520.00 PART E - ADA IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-E1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART E)LS 1 $2,815.20 $2,815.20 1-E2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 15308 $9.00 $137,772.00 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-E3 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 263 $28.80 $7,574.40 1-E4 CONCRETE CURB RAMPS SF 4167 $21.00 $87,507.00 1-E5 SIDEWALK RETAINING CURB LF 50 $46.46 $2,323.00 1-E6 SIDEWALK DRAIN LF 50 $168.00 $8,400.00 1-E7 REFL. PAVEMENT MARKING TYPE 1 (W) (24") (SOLID) - CROSSWALK LF 959 $12.00 $11,508.00 1-E8 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED ADA IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Subtotal: $260,399.60 PART F - STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-F1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART F)LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1-F2 REMOVE EXISTING INLET OR MANHOLE EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1-F3 5' DIAMETER CONCRETE MANHOLE (TYPE-A) (CAST IN PLACE) EA 4 $9,036.00 $36,144.00 1-F4 6' DIAMETER CONCRETE MANHOLE (TYPE-A) (CAST IN PLACE) EA 3 $12,002.40 $36,007.20 1-F5 REMOVE EXISTING REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (15" - 36") LF 437 $56.00 $24,472.00 1-F6 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 5073 $25.35 $128,600.55 1-F7 6' CONCRETE CURB INLET (CAST IN PLACE) EA 9 $5,160.00 $46,440.00 1-F8 5' CONCRETE CURB INLET THROAT EXTENSION EA 28 $2,110.08 $59,082.24 1-F9 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 5' CURB INLET TOP (CAST IN PLACE) EA 9 $4,920.00 $44,280.00 1-F10 18" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III) LF 292 $143.84 $42,001.28 1-F11 24" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III) LF 70 $173.95 $12,176.50 1-F12 36" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III) LF 1186 $203.99 $241,932.14 1-F13 42" DIAMETER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III) LF 801 $240.90 $192,960.90 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-F14 TRENCH SAFETY (STORM WATER INLETS OR MANHOLES) EA 13 $600.00 $7,800.00 1-F15 TRENCH SAFETY (STORM WATER LINE)LF 2349 $6.00 $14,094.00 1-F16 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Subtotal: $928,990.81 PART G - WATER IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-G1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART G)LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1-G2 8" PVC C900 WATERLINE LF 2578 $84.25 $217,196.50 1-G3 8" DI WATERLINE LF 170 $149.54 $25,421.80 1-G4 10" PVC C900 WATERLINE LF 64 $164.18 $10,507.52 1-G5 6" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 1 $1,002.00 $1,002.00 1-G6 8" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,393.20 $2,786.40 1-G7 10" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 2 $2,034.00 $4,068.00 1-G8 16" GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX, RESTRAINED EA 1 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 1-G9 8" 45° DIMJ BEND EA 55 $333.60 $18,348.00 1-G10 10" 45° DIMJ BEND EA 2 $405.60 $811.20 1-G11 8" WATER VALVE EA 18 $1,510.80 $27,194.40 1-G12 10" WATER VALVE EA 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 1-G13 8" DIMJ ELBOW EA 2 $585.60 $1,171.20 1-G14 8" X 8" DIMJ CROSS RESTRAINED EA 2 $482.28 $964.56 1-G15 8" X 6" DIMJ TEE EA 18 $451.20 $8,121.60 1-G16 8" X 6 " DIMJ REDUCER EA 3 $412.80 $1,238.40 1-G17 8" X 8" DIMJ TEE EA 3 $468.00 $1,404.00 1-G18 8" X 10" DIMJ TEE EA 1 $720.00 $720.00 1-G19 6" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 2 $1,386.00 $2,772.00 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-G20 8" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 6 $1,422.00 $8,532.00 1-G21 10" PVC CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, RESTRAINED EA 1 $2,346.00 $2,346.00 1-G22 8" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE EA 1 $4,980.00 $4,980.00 1-G23 16" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE EA 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1-G24 6" PLUG EA 3 $270.00 $810.00 1-G25 8" PLUG EA 5 $300.00 $1,500.00 1-G26 10" PLUG EA 1 $594.00 $594.00 1-G27 NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (TYPE 1)EA 18 $4,405.20 $79,293.60 1-G28 REPLACE EXISTING WATER SERVICE WITH NEW WATER SERVICE LINE W/CONNECTION EA 9 $2,750.40 $24,753.60 1-G29 1" WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (INCLUDING METER ASSEMBLY AND METER BOX) EA 9 $2,084.40 $18,759.60 1-G30 CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER LINE EA 12 $1,431.60 $17,179.20 1-G31 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WATER LINES LF 2578 $2.40 $6,187.20 1-G32 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED WATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal: $543,362.78 PART H - WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-H1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART H)LS 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 1-H2 4' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (6' DEPTH OR LESS) (FIBERGLASS) EA 9 $6,884.40 $61,959.60 1-H3 EXTRA DEPTH FOR 4' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (OVER 6' DEPTH) (FIBERGLASS) VF 35 $768.00 $26,880.00 1-H4 EXTRA DEPTH FOR 5' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (OVER 6' DEPTH) (FIBERGLASS) VF 5 $908.40 $4,542.00 1-H5 5' DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE (6' DEPTH OR LESS) (FIBERGLASS) EA 1 $13,990.80 $13,990.80 1-H6 ADJUST EXISTING WASTEWATER MANHOLE RIM TO GRADE EA 1 $2,022.00 $2,022.00 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM 1-H7 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (0' - 6' DEPTH) LF 9 $74.58 $671.22 1-H8 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (6' - 8' DEPTH) LF 288 $90.18 $25,971.84 1-H9 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (8' - 10' DEPTH) LF 324 $116.75 $37,827.00 1-H10 8" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (10' - 12' DEPTH) LF 75 $156.18 $11,713.50 1-H11 10" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (8' - 10' DEPTH) LF 503 $132.21 $66,501.63 1-H12 10" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER MAIN (10' - 12' DEPTH) LF 655 $165.64 $108,494.20 1-H13 GROUT FILL (8" - 10") VCP WASTEWATER LINE LF 1468 $15.60 $22,900.80 1-H14 SHORT WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE (INCLUDES NEW SERVICE LINE, CLEANOUT, AND CONNECTION) EA 6 $2,425.20 $14,551.20 1-H15 LONG WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE (INCLUDES NEW SERVICE LINE, CLEANOUT, AND CONNECTION) EA 3 $4,305.60 $12,916.80 1-H16 DROP CONNECTION AT MANHOLE EA 1 $2,661.60 $2,661.60 1-H17 TRENCH SAFETY (WASTEWATER MANHOLES) EA 9 $960.00 $8,640.00 1-H18 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WASTEWATER MAIN LF 1854 $9.60 $17,798.40 1-H19 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal: $472,042.59 PART I - GAS IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-I1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART I)LS 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 1-I2 EXCAVATION, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION OF GAS LINES LF 5423 $16.80 $91,106.40 1-I3 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE BOX TO FINISHED GRADE EA 2 $888.00 $1,776.00 1-I4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED GAS IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM Subtotal: $98,382.40 PART J - I.T. IMPROVEMENTS No.Description Unit Qty Unit Price Ext Price 1-J1 MOBILIZATION (MAX. 5% OF PART J)LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1-J2 2" PVC SCHEDULE 40 I.T. CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING AND MULE TAPE LF 2486 $12.00 $29,832.00 1-J3 24"X36"X18" I.T. PULL BOX (INSTALLATION ONLY) EA 14 $2,244.00 $31,416.00 1-J4 ALLOWANCE FOR UNANTICIPATED I.T. IMPROVEMENTS AL 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Subtotal: $65,248.00 CIVCAST LEOPARD STREET - NUECES BAY BLVD. TO PALM DR. (BOND 2018)Report Created On: 11/18/20 8:12:34 PM Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas 2019 2023 thru Description Reconstruction of existing 4-lane roadway, with new pavement, curb & gutter, sidewalks, ADA compliant curb ramps, signage, pavement markings, traffic signalization improvements, and illumination improvements. Proposed section will match the Bond 2012 program alignment and lane configurations. Project #18027A Justification Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; Policy Statements pp. 25-32; Transportation Master Plan. This project will improve the road and accommodate heavier traffic flows and provide a safer driving experience. Budget Impact/Other There is no projected operational impact with this project at this time. A reassessment will be done upon completion of project to determine on- going or maintenance costs. Useful Life 25 years Project Name Leopard St (Palm Dr to Nueces Bay Blvd) Category Street-Rehabilation Type Reconditioning-Asset Longevit Department Street Department Status Active Total2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Expenditures 2,781,397181,397 2,000,000 600,000Construction/Rehab 1,620,0001,620,000Storm Water-St. 975,000975,000WasteWater-St 910,000910,000Water-St. 181,397 3,620,000 2,485,000 6,286,397Total Total2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Funding Sources 2,781,397181,397 2,000,000 600,000G.O. Bond 2018 3,505,0001,620,000 1,885,000Revenue Bonds 181,397 3,620,000 2,485,000 6,286,397Total Contact Director of Public Works Priority 2 Critical- Asset Condition\longe 547 Roadway Asset Services, LLC 7913 Turnback Ledge Trail Lago Vista, TX 78645 214-789-9941 October 14, 2020 Richard Martinez Director Department of Public Works City of Corpus Christi 2525 Hygia Street Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 Dear Mr. Martinez: Roadway Asset Services, LLC (RAS) is pleased to submit this letter addressing the City of Corpus Christi pavement selection criteria when bidding street projects using both hot mix asphalt concrete (HMAC) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement. The purpose of this letter was to provide additional criteria for consideration in design of street projects to streamline the decision process and to provide consideration of not only traffic loading conditions and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA), but also subgrade support characteristics and surrounding surface pavement types. In preparation of this project, we received the following documents for review:  A memorandum from Freese and Nichols titled, “Pavement Selection Criteria”, dated April 22, 2019  A City of Corpus Christi Memorandum titled, “City Council Action Request (CCAR) – January 31, 2017 Bidding Street Bond Projects with Both Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Hot-Mix- Asphalt-Concrete (HMAC), dated February 2, 2017  A City of Corpus Christi Memorandum titled, “City Council Action Request (CCAR) – April 25, 2017 Bidding Street Bond Projects with Both Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Hot-Mix-Asphalt- Concrete (HMAC), dated June 2, 2017  A City of Corpus Christi Memorandum titled, “City Council Action Request (CCAR) – Hot-Mix- Asphalt-Concrete (HMAC) & Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavements, dated April 22, 2019 Background Based upon review of the provided documents, we understand the City started designing and bidding street projects using both HMAC and PCC as part of the 2008 Bond program. Prior to 2008, the City would typically design arterial road reconstruction projects with HMAC pavement. In 2013 the City Council modified the pavement design standards with a 30-year design for both HMAC and PCC using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. The market at the time allowed for more projects to be constructed with PCC. Then in 2016, the City began designing and bidding all arterial Bond projects with both HMAC and PCC alternatives and choosing the lower life cycle cost alternative. In 2017, Engineering Services provided a response to a City Council Action Request providing information on LCCA guidelines for evaluating both HMAC and PCC pavement designs for street project bids. The response provided information on the cost savings of selecting PCC with lower maintenance cost of approximately $100,000 per lane-mile, or $14,20 per square yard. This difference was used by staff to determine which pavement surface material to use based on project bids. If the PCC bid cost was within $100,000 of the HMAC bid, then PCC was chosen as the surface material. 2 In 2019 Freese and Nichols (FNI) provided a report with further analysis and guidelines into the decision process of using LCCA to determine which pavement surface to use for each project. The Freese and Nichols memo provided guidelines for using the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) “Real Cost” program to perform the LCCA analysis. This memo also provided cost data and maintenance cycle guidelines for both HMAC and PCC alternatives. The Freese and Nichols memo also introduced a weighted decision matrix as a tool to determine which pavement surface to use when the difference between total project bid pricing for HMAC and PCC pavement alternatives falls between a specified range of cost. The matrix included such factors as Average Daily Traffic (ADT), Percentage of Trucks and Buses, Adjacent Development/# of Driveways, and Other Engineering Factors. Each factor was provided a weight factor to determine a total score for each alternative. Recommendations from the memo provided a new set of guidelines based on the LCCA performed as part of the design, with current data, and the following criteria: 1. When the cost difference of PCC is below $96,000 ($13,57/SY), the City should recommend PCC 2. When the cost difference of PCC is within the range of $96,000 ($13.57/SY) to $156,000 ($22.55/SY), the City should review the decision matrix to assist with the pavement recommendation (subject to availability of funds) 3. When the dost difference of PCC is above $156,000 ($22.55/SY), the City should recommend HMAC An April 2019 City Council Action Request Memo states that “Although Engineering Services agrees with using the FNI decision matrix to decide which projects are appropriate to bid with both PCC and HMAC, staff also believe adopting a bid award recommendation policy that is known in advance by bidders is a more fair and transparent process. FNI’s decision criteria are good to use in the Design Phase (not Bid Phase) when deciding whether it is appropriate to design and bid a project with both HMAC and PCC pavements.” The memo recommends Engineering Services raise the amount to $125,000 per lane mile ($17.75/square yard), which is approximately the midpoint of the range of $96,000 and $156,000 where FNI recommends applying the decision matrix. The City Council Action Request Memo, dated April 22, 2019, also states that “Engineering Services believe that most arterials are good candidates to design and bid with both PCC and HMAC pavement. Residential collectors and residential streets are not as good candidates for PCC due to factors listed in the FNI decision matrix as well as other factors.” Decision Criteria Updates In review of the 2019 Freese and Nichols report we believed the LCCA models could be revised to include guidelines for treatment applications based on our experience with pavement evaluations and deterioration curves. We wanted to incorporate some of the decision matrix issues into the LCCA to simplify this process and remove the need for the matrix system. We believe the average daily traffic and percentage truck issues are important issues to consider, but these factors are largely accounted for in the design of the pavement structure, which is the initial capital expense. The option that we thought would be most helpful in keeping this process simple would be to break the LCCA guidelines into two main categories based on arterial level streets and residential streets. With this division, the LCCA can consider 3 the different performance expectations and maintenance needs for each main distinction in traffic volumes. Based on our experience evaluating pavement networks and general performance, we believe residential pavements may have a longer service life due partially to the lower truck volume and most distresses being related to environmental factors and the tolerance of a slightly lower level of service than arterial streets. Residential streets require maintenance to enhance the performance with low traffic and exposure to the environmental elements, but often less structural repair. In contrast, arterial streets require more frequent maintenance and often more structural improvements, due to the heavier loading from traffic. The types of maintenance for arterial streets are different than those needed for residential streets. We developed two different approaches for maintenance for arterial and residential streets. In addition to the traffic impact, we believe the soil types, support characteristics, and expansive potential of clay soils also have a major impact on the performance of pavement structures. In our experience, pavements on clays soils must be designed with an additional stabilized layer, which should be accounted for in the initial design and capital expenses. However, due to deep wetting of the subgrade, expansive soils will also require more frequent maintenance due to the higher percentage of cracking and differential movement anticipated and, in some cases, different maintenance. HMAC pavements will likely require addition mill and overlay activities to correct differential movement and PCC pavements will likely require grinding and additional panel replacements due to the differential movements. A separate set of guidelines were developed for both the arterial and residential classifications of roadway for expansive soils. We characterize expansive soils as those exhibiting plasticity indices (PI) greater than 30. Laboratory tests and swell testing can be conducted to find specific characteristics of soil samples within each roadway, but a PI of 30 is largely considered as the threshold from low to moderate expansion potential among geotechnical engineers. We used typical maintenance treatments that the City of Corpus Christi would use for the various classifications of streets. We visited with the City Engineering Services staff to identify treatments, estimated costs per square yard, and when and how often they would typically apply these treatments for each level of roadway. We did not consider minor activities such as periodic pothole patching in the LCCA models and analysis as these costs are sporadic and negligible to the overall life cycle cost. The following tables present our recommended maintenance activities, year of application, and estimated cost for each treatment. Illustrations of the deterioration models used to develop the maintenance criteria and strategies are included in Appendix A of this report. Table 1 -PCC Arterials PCC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - PCC 0 * Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 7 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) 14 $80 $563,200 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 18 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) 26 $80 $563,200 Reseal Joints and Cracks #3 29 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #3 (25%) 33 $80 $563,200 4 *Use Total Project Bid for PCC including all Utilities Table 2 - HMAC Arterials HMAC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - HMAC 0 * Surface Seal #1 5 $4 $28,160 Crack Seal #1 10 $1 $7,040 Mill and Overlay #1 15 $45 $316,800 Surface Seal #2 20 $4 $28,160 Crack Seal #2 23 $1 $7,040 Mill and Overlay #2 29 $45 $316,800 Surface Seal #3 35 $4 $28,160 *Use Total Project Bid for HMAC including all utilities Table 3 - PCC Arterials on Expansive Soils PCC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - PCC 0 * Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 5 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) 11 $80 $563,200 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 14 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) 20 $80 $563,200 Diamond Grinding with Joint Replacement 25 $20 $140,800 Panel Replacement #3 (25%) 29 $80 $563,200 Reseal Joints and Cracks #3 32 $3 $21,120 *Use Total Project Bid for PCC including all Utilities Table 4 - HMAC Arterials with Expansive Soils HMAC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - HMAC 0 * Surface Seal #1 4 $4 $28,160 Crack Seal #1 8 $1 $7,040 Mill and Overlay #1 13 $45 $316,800 Surface Seal #2 17 $4 $28,160 Crack Seal #2 20 $1 $7,040 Mill and Overlay #2 25 $45 $316,800 Surface Seal #3 29 $4 $28,160 Mill and Overlay #3 33 $45 $316,800 5 *Use Total Project Bid for HMAC including all utilities Table 5 - PCC Residentials PCC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - PCC 0 * Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 9 $3 $21,120 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 15 $3 $21,120 Reseal Joints and Cracks #3 20 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) 26 $80 $563,200 Reseal Joints and Cracks #4 35 $3 $21,120 *Use Total Project Bid for PCC including all Utilities Table 6 - HMAC Residentials HMAC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - HMAC 0 * HA5 seal #1 5 $5 $35,200 Crack Seal #1 15 $1 $7,040 Mill and Overlay #1 20 $45 $316,800 HA5 seal #2 24 $5 $35,200 Crack Seal #2 33 $1 $7,040 *Use Total Project Bid for HMAC including all utilities Table 7 - PCC Residentials on Expansive Soils PCC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - PCC 0 * Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 6 $3 $21,120 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 15 $3 $21,120 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) 20 $80 $563,200 Diamond Grinding with Joint Replacement 27 $20 $140,800 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) 33 $80 $563,200 *Use Total Project Bid for PCC including all Utilities 6 Table 8 - HMAC Residentials with Expansive Soils HMAC Life Cycle Cost Activities Year Cost ($/SY) Cost ($/laneMile) Full Reconstruction - HMAC 0 * HA5 Seal #1 4 $5 $35,200 Crack Seal #1 11 $1 $7,040 Mill and Overlay #1 20 $45 $316,800 HA5 seal #2 24 $5 $35,200 Crack Seal #2 33 $1 $7,040 *Use Total Project Bid for HMAC including all utilities Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) Models We used a simple spreadsheet (modeled similar to the Federal Highway Administration’s “Real Cost” program, but more transparent and simple to follow) to evaluate the LCCA for the four categories (eight scenarios) developed using the split between arterials and residential streets, and non-expansive soils versus expansive soils for both HMAC and PCC pavements. The spreadsheet was used to model the assigned maintenance activities developed from the deterioration curves and assigned costs determined in the previous section for each activity based on the year of application. A 4.0% discount rate and 3.0% inflation rate were used to determine future costs and equate them to present worth value for a 40-year analysis per lane mile. A simple user fee was also accounted for based upon an assumed delay due to the activity and a simple cost per hour of the delay. The total present worth value was used for each scenario to determine the total 40-year maintenance cost anticipated per lane mile for each scenario. The difference between this maintenance cost per lane mile were used to develop new recommendations for when to choose PCC over HMAC based on the maintenance differential costs. Table 9 - LCCA Comparison of Alternatives PWV ($/lane mile) Difference PCC Arterial $472,190 HMAC Arterial $600,698 $128,509 PCC Arterial (Expansive) $605,053 HMAC Arterial (Expansive) $623,099 $18,046 PCC Residential $274,970 HMAC Residential $333,909 $58,938 PCC Residential (Expansive) $367,446 HMAC Residential (Expansive) $334,475 -$32,971 7 The results indicate that for arterial streets on soils with a PI less than 30, if the initial construction bid is within $128,000 ($18.18/SY) between HMAC and PCC, then PCC should be chosen. If the difference in initial construction bid is greater than $128,00, then HMAC should be chosen. A much lower level was found for arterials on expansive soils and in residential streets. For streets with expansive soils, where the PI of the majority of the soil is greater than 30 and defined as a moderate to high swell potential by the design Geotechnical Engineer, the LCCA models indicate a HMAC surface should be used for both arterial streets and residential streets. Further evaluation of the arterial streets shows the comparison of the alternatives based on agency costs and user costs. Figure 1 - Comparison of Agency and User Costs for Arterial Streets Complete results of all the LCCA evaluations for all eight scenarios are presented in Appendix B of this letter. Recommendations Based upon the results of our evaluations, we recommend the City adopt a simple process for making the decision between HMAC and PCC pavements when bidding street projects. We believe the initial division should separate projects between arterial/collector business streets and residential streets. The secondary division should then consider the supporting subgrade within the project, between expansive clay soils and non-expansive soils, based on the geotechnical design report, which will summarize the basic soil types in the project. We recommend defining the project as on expansive soils when most of the subgrade within the alignment contains a PI greater than 30, or as classified by the project Geotechnical Engineer as expansive soil. These two divisions divide potential projects into four categories. The first category is an arterial street on non-expansive soils. We recommend choosing PCC pavement when the bid price is within $128,000 per lane mile ($18.18/SY). This will allow a good portion of PCC pavements for the high traffic volume streets and provide a durable, lowest cost maintenance option for the street. The second category is an arterial street on expansive soils. We recommend choosing HMAC pavement when the subgrade soils contain mostly moderate to highly expansive soils. Design can account for some of the expansion potential of the soils and stabilized layers beneath the pavement structure can certainly reduce the risk and improve structural strength and performance. However, based upon the nature of expansive soils and the depth of potential wetting of the subgrade, expansion and vertical movement can 8 occur as deep as eight (8) feet below the pavement surface, or even deeper in extreme situations. This movement causes differential movement at PCC joints and uplift of all pavement surfaces in isolated heaves oriented perpendicular to traffic travel. The deterioration models were designed to account for this potential movement to model the maintenance that would be required for each pavement type. The LCCA results indicate the bid for a PCC pavement would need to be within $18,000 per lane mile to make sense to pave with PCC. Due to this low differential is maintenance cost, we recommend choosing HMAC for this category regardless of the bid price. The third and forth categories are for residential streets on non-expansive soils and expansive soils. The LCCA model for residential streets on non-expansive soils indicated if the PCC bid is within $59,000/lane mile, PCC should be chosen. The LCCA model for residential streets on expansive soils indicates there is no bid price that would make PCC a cheaper selection based upon the maintenance anticipated. Based upon the financial investments in the initial pavement structure and utilities, likelihood of cuts in the pavement for the numerous residential utility extensions, and the difficulty in reconstruction and maintenance of PCC in residential areas, we do not recommend selecting PCC in either these categories for residential streets. Based upon the results of the LCCA criteria and models established in this evaluation, we recommend the pavement surface material selection should be based on the following: 1. When the cost difference of PCC is below $128,000/lane mile ($18.18/SY), the City should recommend PCC. 2. When the project contains a majority subgrade with a PI greater than 30 or deemed as a moderate to highly expansive soil by the design Geotechnical Engineer, the City should recommend HMAC. 3. When the project is a residential street classification, for non-expansive and expansive subgrade soils, the City should recommend HMAC. 4. Other criteria to consider is if the adjacent pavement section is PCC, consideration should be given to providing a uniform surface type, at the discretion of the City Engineering Services staff. Thank you for the opportunity to provide professional services for the evaluation and development of recommendations for pavement selection criteria when bidding street projects using both hot mix asphalt concrete (HMAC) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement. Please call if you have any questions regarding the recommendations provided in this letter. Respectfully submitted, G. Scot Gordon, PE, IAM President Roadway Asset Services, LLC (TxBPE firm # 22104) 9 Appendix A – Deterioration Models Figure A-1 - PCC Arterials Figure A-2 - HMAC Arterials 10 Figure A-3 - PCC Arterials with Expansive Soils Figure A-4 - HMAC Arterials with Expansive Soils 11 Figure A-5 - PCC Residentials Figure A-6 - HMAC Residentials 12 Figure A-7 - PCC Residentials with Expansive Soils Figure A-8 - HMAC Residentials with Expansive Soils 13 Appendix B – LCCA Results DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% PCC Arterial ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 30,000 UNIT AGENCY USER COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS Cost COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 7 Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 $3.69 7,040 sq yds $25,974.94 7 User Delay Costs $1.23 250 hours $307.47 7 $26,282.40 $19,972.47 14 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) $121.01 1,760 sq yds $212,972.63 14 User Delay Costs $1.51 35,000 hours $52,940.64 14 $265,913.27 $153,558.29 18 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 $5.11 7,040 sq yds $35,955.39 18 User Delay Costs $1.70 250 hours $425.61 18 $36,380.99 $17,958.68 26 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) $172.53 1,760 sq yds $303,648.05 26 User Delay Costs $2.16 35,000 hours $75,480.69 26 $379,128.74 $136,747.66 29 Reseal Joints and Cracks #3 $7.07 7,040 sq yds $49,770.66 29 User Delay Costs $2.36 250 hours $589.14 29 $50,359.80 $16,147.94 33 Panel Replacement #3 (25%) $212.19 1,760 sq yds $373,448.80 33 User Delay Costs $2.65 35,000 hours $92,831.73 33 $466,280.53 $127,804.78 $1,001,770.47 $222,575.29 $1,224,345.76 PRESENT WORTH = $472,189.82 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Reseal Joints and Cracks $3.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Panel Replacement (25%) $80.00 sq yd 5 14 Diamond Grinding with joint replacment $20.00 sq yd 5 2 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-1 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 14 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% HMAC Arterial ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 30,000 UNIT AGENCY USER COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS Cost COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 5 Surface Seal #1 $4.64 7,040 sq yds $32,645.16 5 User Delay Costs $1.16 250 hours $289.82 5 $32,934.98 $27,070.15 10 Crack Seal #1 $1.34 7,040 sq yds $9,461.17 10 User Delay Costs $1.34 250 hours $335.98 10 $9,797.15 $6,618.60 15 Mill and Overlay #1 $70.11 7,040 sq yds $493,564.08 15 User Delay Costs $1.56 2,500 hours $3,894.92 15 $497,459.00 $276,221.32 20 Surface Seal #2 $7.22 7,040 sq yds $50,860.09 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 250 hours $451.53 20 $51,311.62 $23,417.95 23 Crack Seal #2 $1.97 7,040 sq yds $13,894.05 23 User Delay Costs $1.97 250 hours $493.40 23 $14,387.45 $5,837.37 29 Mill and Overlay #2 $106.05 7,040 sq yds $746,559.95 29 User Delay Costs $2.36 2,500 hours $5,891.41 29 $752,451.37 $241,274.60 35 Surface Seal #3 $11.26 7,040 sq yds $79,238.37 35 User Delay Costs $2.81 250 hours $703.47 35 $79,941.83 $20,258.50 $1,426,222.87 $12,060.52 $1,438,283.39 PRESENT WORTH = $600,698.49 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Surface Seal $4.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Crack Seal $1.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Mill and Overlay $45.00 sq yd 5 1 HA5 $5.00 sq yd 0.5 1 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-2 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 15 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% PCC Arterial (Expansive) ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 30,000 UNIT AGENCY USER COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS Cost COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 5 Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 $3.48 7,040 sq yds $24,483.87 5 User Delay Costs $1.16 250 hours $289.82 5 $24,773.69 $20,362.16 11 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) $110.74 1,760 sq yds $194,900.13 11 User Delay Costs $1.38 35,000 hours $48,448.19 11 $243,348.31 $158,074.42 14 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 $4.54 7,040 sq yds $31,945.89 14 User Delay Costs $1.51 250 hours $378.15 14 $32,324.04 $18,666.33 20 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) $144.49 1,760 sq yds $254,300.46 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 35,000 hours $63,213.89 20 $317,514.36 $144,909.41 25 Diamond Grinding with Joint Replacement$41.88 7,040 sq yds $294,803.93 25 User Delay Costs $2.09 5,000 hours $10,468.89 25 $305,272.82 $114,512.96 29 Panel Replacement #3 (25%) $188.53 1,760 sq yds $331,804.42 29 User Delay Costs $2.36 35,000 hours $82,479.79 29 $414,284.22 $132,840.82 32 Reseal Joints and Cracks #3 $7.73 7,040 sq yds $54,385.75 32 User Delay Costs $2.58 250 hours $643.77 32 $55,029.52 $15,686.60 $1,186,624.46 $205,922.50 $1,392,546.96 PRESENT WORTH = $605,052.71 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Reseal Joints and Cracks $3.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Panel Replacement (25%) $80.00 sq yd 5 14 Diamond Grinding with joint replacment $20.00 sq yd 5 2 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-3 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 16 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% HMAC Arterial (Expansive) ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 30,000 UNIT AGENCY USER COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS Cost COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 4 Surface Seal #1 $4.50 7,040 sq yds $31,694.33 4 User Delay Costs $1.13 250 hours $281.38 4 $31,975.71 $27,332.97 8 Crack Seal #1 $1.27 7,040 sq yds $8,918.06 8 User Delay Costs $1.27 250 hours $316.69 8 $9,234.75 $6,747.74 13 Mill and Overlay #1 $66.08 7,040 sq yds $465,231.48 13 User Delay Costs $1.47 2,500 hours $3,671.33 13 $468,902.81 $281,610.88 17 Surface Seal #2 $6.61 7,040 sq yds $46,544.19 17 User Delay Costs $1.65 250 hours $413.21 17 $46,957.40 $24,106.67 20 Crack Seal #2 $1.81 7,040 sq yds $12,715.02 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 250 hours $451.53 20 $13,166.55 $6,009.04 25 Mill and Overlay #2 $94.22 7,040 sq yds $663,308.85 25 User Delay Costs $2.09 2,500 hours $5,234.44 25 $668,543.29 $250,781.82 30 Surface Seal #3 $9.71 7,040 sq yds $68,351.71 30 User Delay Costs $2.43 250 hours $606.82 30 $68,958.53 $21,261.20 34 Crack Seal #3 $2.73 7,040 sq yds $19,232.61 34 User Delay Costs $2.73 250 hours $682.98 34 $19,915.59 $5,248.80 $1,315,996.25 $11,658.38 $1,327,654.64 PRESENT WORTH = $623,099.12 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Surface Seal $4.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Crack Seal $1.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Mill and Overlay $45.00 sq yd 5 1 HA5 $5.00 sq yd 0.5 1 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-4 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 17 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% PCC Residential ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 2,000 UNIT COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 9 Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 $3.91 7,040 sq yds $27,556.81 9 User Delay Costs $1.30 17 hours $21.75 9 $27,578.56 $19,376.33 15 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 $4.67 7,040 sq yds $32,904.27 15 User Delay Costs $1.56 17 hours $25.97 15 $32,930.24 $18,284.99 20 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) $144.49 1,760 sq yds $254,300.46 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 933 hours $1,685.70 20 $255,986.17 $116,828.74 26 Reseal Joints and Cracks #3 $6.47 7,040 sq yds $45,547.21 26 User Delay Costs $2.16 17 hours $35.94 26 $45,583.15 $16,441.35 32 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) $206.01 1,760 sq yds $362,571.65 32 User Delay Costs $2.58 933 hours $2,403.41 32 $364,975.06 $104,039.04 PRESENT WORTH = $274,970.46 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Reseal Joints and Cracks $3.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Panel Replacement (25%) $80.00 sq yd 2 14 Diamond Grinding with joint replacment $20.00 sq yd 2 2 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-5 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 18 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% HMAC Residential ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 2,000 UNIT COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 5 HA5 Seal #1 $5.80 7,040 sq yds $40,806.45 5 User Delay Costs $1.16 33 hours $38.64 5 $40,845.09 $33,571.69 15 Crack Seal #1 $1.56 7,040 sq yds $10,968.09 15 User Delay Costs $1.56 17 hours $25.97 15 $10,994.06 $6,104.61 20 Mill and Overlay #1 $81.28 7,040 sq yds $572,176.04 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 33 hours $60.20 20 $572,236.24 $261,161.15 24 HA5 Seal #2 $10.16 7,040 sq yds $71,554.35 24 User Delay Costs $2.03 33 hours $67.76 24 $71,622.11 $27,941.32 33 Crack Seal #2 $2.65 7,040 sq yds $18,672.44 33 User Delay Costs $2.65 17 hours $44.21 33 $18,716.65 $5,130.12 PRESENT WORTH = $333,908.89 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Surface Seal $4.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Crack Seal $1.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Mill and Overlay $45.00 sq yd 1 1 HA5 $5.00 sq yd 1 1 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-6 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 19 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% PCC Residential (Expansive) ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 2,000 UNIT COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 6 Reseal Joints and Cracks #1 $3.58 7,040 sq yds $25,218.38 6 User Delay Costs $1.19 17 hours $19.90 6 $25,238.29 $19,946.18 15 Reseal Joints and Cracks #2 $4.67 7,040 sq yds $32,904.27 15 User Delay Costs $1.56 17 hours $25.97 15 $32,930.24 $18,284.99 20 Panel Replacement #1 (25%) $144.49 1,760 sq yds $254,300.46 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 1,400 hours $2,528.56 20 $256,829.02 $117,213.41 27 Diamond Grinding with Joint Replacement$44.43 7,040 sq yds $312,757.49 27 User Delay Costs $2.22 200 hours $444.26 27 $313,201.75 $108,623.56 33 Panel Replacement #2 (25%) $212.19 1,760 sq yds $373,448.80 33 User Delay Costs $2.65 1,400 hours $3,713.27 33 $377,162.07 $103,377.93 PRESENT WORTH = $367,446.07 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Reseal Joints and Cracks $3.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Panel Replacement (25%) $80.00 sq yd 3 14 Diamond Grinding with joint replacment $20.00 sq yd 3 2 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-7 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 20 DATE:10/9/2020 INFLATION RATE:3.00% TITLE:Corpus Christi DISCOUNT RATE:4.00% HMAC Residential (Expansive) ANALYSIS PERIOD:40 years PROJECT SIZE:7,040 square yards Assumed ADT: 2,000 UNIT COSTS BY PRESENT YEAR OPTION COST QUANTITY UNITS COST YEAR VALUE 0 0 $0.00 4 HA5 Seal #1 $5.63 7,040 sq yds $39,617.91 4 User Delay Costs $1.13 33 hours $37.52 4 $39,655.43 $33,897.63 11 Crack Seal #1 $1.38 7,040 sq yds $9,745.01 11 User Delay Costs $1.38 17 hours $23.07 11 $9,768.08 $6,345.16 20 Mill and Overlay #1 $81.28 7,040 sq yds $572,176.04 20 User Delay Costs $1.81 33 hours $60.20 20 $572,236.24 $261,161.15 24 HA5 Seal #2 $10.16 7,040 sq yds $71,554.35 24 User Delay Costs $2.03 33 hours $67.76 24 $71,622.11 $27,941.32 33 Crack Seal #2 $2.65 7,040 sq yds $18,672.44 33 User Delay Costs $2.65 17 hours $44.21 33 $18,716.65 $5,130.12 PRESENT WORTH = $334,475.38 UNIT COSTS Cost Units Delay (mins) Duration (days) Surface Seal $4.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Crack Seal $1.00 sq yd 0.5 1 Mill and Overlay $45.00 sq yd 1 1 HA5 $5.00 sq yd 1 1 User Delay Costs $1.00 hour Fig. B-8 Life Cycle Cost Analysis DATE: February 23, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Charles Mendoza, Director of Asset Management Charlesm2@cctexas.com (361) 826-1941 Kevin Smith, Assistant Director of Aviation KevinS4@cctexas.com (361) 289-0171 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing a four-month service agreement with Lindamood Inc., for an amount not to exceed $212,378.00 for demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at the Corpus Christi International Airport; appropriating funds from the unreserved fund balance of the Airport Capital Reserves; and amending the budget. SUMMARY: This item recommends a four-month service agreement to demolish Aircraft Hangar One at Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA). The demolition project will be overseen by Asset Management. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The CCIA is owned, operated, and maintained by the City of Corpus Christi and located in Nueces County, Texas. CCIA is made up of over 2,700 acres; 1,100 acres being inside the Airport Operations Area (AOA) and classified as a non-hub, commercial service airport. Demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at the Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting February 23, 2021 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 The East GA Hangar No. 1 is a single-story hyperbolic paraboloid arch concrete facility constructed in the early 1960’s. The facility served primarily as a hangar with office space to the East Side Fixed Base Operations (FBO) serving the general aviation community. The Facility had been under lease and managed by Signature Flight Support up until their departure in March 2020. The hangar roof and foundation are constructed with reinforced concrete. The end walls are metal panels. The total size is approximately 28,000 SF allocated to open hangar space and 8,000 SF for administrative offices. The concrete roof has a fully adhered membrane covering. Severe structural cracks were discovered in the roof structure during visual field investigations in 2020. Age, and recent damage from Hurricane Harvey have revealed multiple distresses in the building structure including:  Building structure include several concrete spalls and pop-outs which indicate that future spalls or pop-outs could occur which is a potential safety hazard for personnel and aircraft.  No longer being watertight resulting in developments of mold and mildew.  Fiberglass infill panels between the concrete sub-structures are disintegrating.  Wooden framing member is rotting.  Cracked concrete floor inadequately sloped floor allowing water to migrate into the hanger.  Most of the exposed interior steel framing is also corroding. With several deficiencies noted, including the potential for safety hazards from future pop - outs and spalls, the airport has closed the facility from public entry. The Hangar is several decades old and there are several concerns with the overall building, its usability, and serviceability. Considering both the cost and the risk of unknown performance of our 60+ year old facility, the city staff and our A/E consultant recommend demolishing the structure. Contracts and Procurement conducted a competitive Request for Bid process and received eight bids and is recommending award to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder, Lindamood, Inc. ALTERNATIVES: Repairing the hangar would cost more than building a new structure. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for Aviation in FY 2021 is $212,378.00 for a four-month service agreement. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 4610 Airport Organization/Activity: 35030 Airport Parking/Transportation Mission Element: 274 TranAirport 2012A Debt Svs Project # (CIP Only): n/a Account: 530000 Professional Services RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this ordinance authorizing a four-month service agreement with Lindamood, Inc. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Bid Tabulation Service Agreement Ordinance authorizing a four-month service agreement with Lindamood Inc., for an amount not to exceed $212,378.00 for demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at the Corpus Christi International Airport; appropriating funds from the unreserved fund balance of the Airport Capital Reserves; and amending the budget. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. That the service agreement with Lindamood, Inc., of Texas for a total amount not to exceed $212,378.00 for the demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at CCIA is approved. SECTION 2. That funds in the amount of $212,378.00 are appropriated from the unreserved fund balance in the No. 4610 Airport Fund for the service agreement with Lindamood, Inc. for the demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at CCIA. SECTION 3. That the FY2020-21 Operating Budget and Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 032203, is amended to increase proposed expenditures in the No. 4610 Airport Fund by $212,378.00 for the service agreement with Lindamood, Inc. for the demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at CCIA. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor City of Corpus Christi -Bid Tabulation Sr. Buyer: Minerva Alvarado RFB 3375 - Demolition of Aircraft Hangar One at CCIA t Hangar One at CCIA Lindamood, Inc Coastal Bend Demolition Inc. Costa Verde Resources, LLC JR Ramon & Sons, Inc South Plains Contracting Ideal Construction & Design LLC Mahan Construction Consultants American Abatement LLC Irving, TX Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Christi, TX San Antonio, TX Adkins, TX Robstown, TX Houston, TX San Antonio,, TX Item Description Unit Qty Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Demolition of Aircraft Hangar One Lumpsum 1 $204,578.00 $220,200.00 $273,588.14 $281,150.00 $291,879.00 $780,000.00 $1,400,000.00 2 Allowance Permit Fees Allowance $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $212,378.00 $228,000.00 $281,388.14 $288,950.00 $299,679.00 $787,800.00 $1,407,800.00 Withdrew Bid DATE: February 23, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Kevin Smith, Assistant Director of Aviation Kevins4@cctexas.com (361) 289-0171 ext. 1292 CAPTION: Ordinance appropriating $202,931.55 from the unreserved fund balance in the Airport Operating Fund for the purchase of parking/revenue control systems, pay-on-foot machines, booths, and canopies for Corpus Christi International Airport and amending the budget. SUMMARY: Purchase of the equipment will replace/repair equipment, canopies and booths that were installed in 2014. The new equipment and materials will enhance customer service, provide customers more options to pay, and ultimately help to reduce manpower associated with the parking control plaza. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On March 19, 2013, the City Council approved a management service agreement with Republic Parking System (RPS). RPS assumed responsibility for parking operations at the Corpus Christi International Airport on June 03, 2013. The industry trend at that time shifted to outside management agreements that allow for flexibility and financial investment by the contractor. In exchange for the contract and capital investment of $400,000, only $197,068.45 of these funds were used. The remaining funds of $202,931.55 will be utilized to replace/repair equipment, canopies and booths that were installed in 2014. Since that time, many conditions have changed, (i.e., Affordable Health Care Act, COVID, and an aging parking revenue system). Therefore, the city (i.e., airport staff) will assume the responsibility for all parking operations at the airport. This will be done with a hybrid staffing, that will allow flexibility in work assignments throughout the day, and not just related to parking operations. These positions will also assist the Operations Division with inspections, assist customers in the terminal, assist Facilities Division with the Quick Turnaround Facility (QTA) and pick-up litter and debris as they traverse the grounds of the airport. The increase in revenue to the airport will be more than $200,000 after year one. AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of February 23, 2021 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of March 2, 2021 Appropriate $202,931.55 from the Airport Deferred Revenue Fund Balance for the purchase and installation of parking equipment, canopy replacement, and booth replacement at Corpus Christi International Airport as per agreement with Republic Parking System. ALTERNATIVES: Produce a new RFP with another 3rd party parking service and continue to lose revenue. FISCAL IMPACT: Equipment and Repair Cost Estimate Total - $202,931.55 Funding Detail: Fund: 4610 Organization/Activity: 35040 - Facilities Mission Element: 271 Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 530210 RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests approval of Ordinance as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance appropriating $202,931.55 from the unreserved fund balance in the No. 4610 Airport Fund for the purchase of parking/revenue control systems, pay-on-foot machines, booths, and canopies for Corpus Christi International Airport and amending the FY 2020-2021 Operating Budget. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: Funds in the amount of $202,931.55 are appropriated from the unreserved fund balance in the No. 4610 Airport Fund for the purchase of parking/revenue control systems, pay- on-foot machines, booths, and canopies for Corpus Christi International Airport, and the FY2020-2021 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 032203 is amended to increase expenditures by $202,931.55. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ______________________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of ______________________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ _________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Eyvon McHaney, Director of Human Resources EyvonMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3979 Mike Markle, Chief of Police MikeMa@cctexas.com (361) 886-2601 Josh Chronley, Interim Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. of Oak Brook, Illinois for a total amount not to exceed $379,210.00 for promotional testing services for the Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD) through the Human Resources Department, with FY 2021 funding in an amount of $63,000.00 available through the General Fund. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. for promotional testing services for CCPD. This firm will provide, design, validate, administer, score, and present the results of a promotional process that incorporates best practices currently used in the field of testing to assist CCPD identify incumbents who are best qualified for promotion to the ranks of Senior Officer, Police Lieutenant, and Police Captain. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The previous contract was with Dennis A. Joiner & Associates and was $17,232.68 for FY 2020. The selected consultant will develop the test. The selected consultant also will provide the City with experience and knowledge in test development and the Promotional Testing for Police Department AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 administration of promotional examinations as well as legally defensible assessments of candidates, job analysis, and assessment center development and administration. The Consultant also will assist the City in maintaining compliance with Collective Bargaining Agreements, Local Government Code Chapter 143 and City of Corpus Christi Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulation. On September 28, 2020, the Contracts and Procurement Department issued a Request for Proposals to obtain qualified firms for promotional testing services with the RFQ Number 3227 for the Corpus Christi Police Department. The City received a total of four Proposals. The selection committee consisted of representatives from the Police Department and the Human Resources Department. On December 2, 2020, the selection committee conducted interviews with all four of the firms that were recommended by the evaluation committee. Firms were ranked based on five factors: 1) firm’s experience and qualifications of firm; 2) experience and qualifications of the project manager and key staff; 3) project approach and management plan; 4) respondent capacity; and 5) respondent past performance ALTERNATIVES: An alternative to not securing a three-year contract would be for the Human Resources Department to hire a consulting firm each time promotional testing must be conducted. The Human Resources Department would be required to do this in order to comply with the Police Department’s Collective Bargaining agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for CCPD in FY 2021 is $63,000.00 for this three-year service agreement for promotional testing services. The remaining cost will be budgeted in future years through the annual budget process. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 1020 General Fund Organization/Activity: 11700 Police Administration Mission Element: 151 Respond to Law Enforcement Calls Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 530000 Professional Services RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. for promotional testing for the CCPD as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Evaluation Matrix RFP No.3227- Promotional Testing for the Police Dept. Maria Pedraza Proposal Evaluation Minimum Qualifications Industial Organizational Solutions Dennis A. Joiner Assoicates CPS HR Consulting First Idea Inc. Required ten years in Business No outstanding lawsuits during last 5 years or current litigation with the City during last 5 years No outstanding regulatory issues last 5 years References Provided for firm Technical Proposal Technical Proposal (50 points)47 44 40 40 Firms' Experience (18 points) Team Experience (18 points) Understanding of Project Scope (14 points) Interview Interview (30 points)27 26 26 25 Firms' Experience (8 points) Team Experience (10 points) Understanding of Project Scope (12 points) Price Price (20) 14 17 20 17 Total 88 87 86 82 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 1 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 3227 Promotional Testing for the City of Corpus Christi's Police Department THIS Promotional Testing for the City of the Corpus Christi's Police Department Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”) and Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. (“Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee (“City Manager”). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Promotional Testing for the City of Corpus Christi's Police Department in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 3227 (“RFB/RFP”), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor’s bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Promotional Testing for the City of Corpus Christi's Police Department (“Services”) in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for three years, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or the Contracts and Procurement Department, or the performance date listed in the notice to proceed, whichever is later. The parties may mutually extend the term of this Agreement for up to zero additional zero-year periods (“Option Period(s)”), provided, the parties do so by written amendment prior to the expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The City’s extension authorization must be executed by the City Manager or designee. 3.Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $379,210.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. Contractor shall invoice no more frequently than once per month. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Any amount not expended during the initial term or any option period may, at the City’s discretion, be allocated for use in the next option period. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 2 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 Invoices will be mailed to the following address with a copy provided to the Contract Administrator: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 4.Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City’s Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Eyvon McHaney Human Resources Phone: (361) 826-3979 Email: eyvonmc@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A)Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance (“COI”), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City’s Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days’ advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B)In the event that a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond’s terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The Service Agreement Standard Form Page 3 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7.Inspection and Acceptance. City may inspect all Services and products supplied before acceptance. Any Services or products that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item’s bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City’s invoice. 8. Warranty. (A) The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. (B)In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (C)Contractor warrants that all Services will be performed in accordance with the standard of care used by similarly situated contractors performing similar services. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City’s actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City’s product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City’s City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 4 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. In performing the Services, the Contractor will not enter into subcontracts or utilize the services of subcontractors. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other applicable taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Eyvon McHaney Director of Human Resources 1201 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Phone: (361) 826-3979 Fax: (361) 826-3322 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. Attn: Chad C. Legel, M.s. President & CEO 1520 Kensington Road, Suite 110, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Phone: (888) 784-1290 Fax: (708) 410-1558 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (“INDEMNITEES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT OF Service Agreement Standard Form Page 5 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS, OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES, WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR OR RESULTS FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING OR RESULTING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A)The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor’s failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B)Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19.Owner’s Manual and Preventative Maintenance. Contractor agrees to provide a copy of the owner’s manual and/or preventative maintenance guidelines or instructions if available for any equipment purchased by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor must provide such documentation upon delivery of such equipment and prior to receipt of the final payment by the City. 20.Limitation of Liability. The City’s maximum liability under this Agreement is limited to the total amount of compensation listed in Section 3 of this Agreement. In no event shall the City be liable for incidental, consequential or special damages. 21. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written Service Agreement Standard Form Page 6 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 22. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 23.Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A.this Agreement (excluding attachments and exhibits); B.its attachments; C.the bid solicitation document including any addenda (Exhibit 1); then, D.the Contractor’s bid response (Exhibit 2). 24.Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 “Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this Agreement if required by said statute. 25.Governing Law. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, Texas, and City laws in the performance of this Agreement. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 26.Public Information Act Requirements. This paragraph applies only to agreements that have a stated expenditure of at least $1,000,000 or that result in the expenditure of at least $1,000,000 by the City. The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Government Code, may apply to this contract and the Contractor agrees that the contract can be terminated if the Contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. 27.Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 7 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ________________________________________________ Josh Chronley Interim Assistant Director, Contracts and Procurement Date: _________________________ Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance and Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 3227 Exhibit 2: Contractor’s Bid/Proposal Response SCOPE OF WORK 1. General Requirements The Contractor shall perform tasks, under the direction of Human Resources, associated with the development, statistical analysis, and assessment center process for promotional examinations of law enforcement officers. The Contractor will also comply with Texas Government Code 143, City of Corpus Christi Civil Service rules and regulations, and Collective Bargaining Agreements (see exhibit A), concerning Written Examinations and Asset Centers. 2. Scope of Work 1.The Contractor will professionally develop and supply under the direction of Human Resources Department a multiple choice 100 question written examination that will be administered by the Human Resources Department using sources that are provided and approved by the Civil Service Commission. 2.Contractor shall deliver the examination questions in a sealed and secured manner confidentially to the Human Resources Department. The examination will be developed in a way that can be graded immediately following the exam. Ranks include Police Captain and Police Lieutenant and a proficiency exam for Senior Officers. 3.Contractor will provide to the Human Resources Director or designee as the Head of the Civil Service Commission a written response to any appealed test question for Police Lieutenant and Police Captain. The response will be used on the City’s behalf in the Civil Service Commission meeting. The Commission will determine whether a test question will be deleted, changed, or has more than one answer. The decision rendered by the Commission is final and changes to grading will be made by the Human Resources Department. 4.Contractor will professionally develop and administer under the direction of the Human Resources Department an assessment center for the ranks of Police Captain and Police Lieutenant using a minimum of three exercise which adequately assesses measurable dimensions of the job analysis. The assessment will count as 60 percent of the total score and will be graded in a way that will go out at least two decimal point to eliminate any possible ties. 5.Contractor will utilize audio/video equipment to conduct assessment center exercises. 6.Contractor will develop the job analysis using equivalent and/or higher ranks within the Corpus Christi Police Department as subject matter experts. ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 2 Coordination and selection of the SME’s will be the responsibility of the Human Resources Department. 7.Contractor will provide assessors training in the administration and grading process for a minimum eight hours prior to conducting the assessment center. 8.Contractor will provide a classroom style orientation to candidates on general information of the assessment center process. 9.Contractor will comply with providing within 24 hours of the conclusion of the entire Assessment Center process, excluding weekends and City-observed holidays, the grading for the assessment center so that Human Resources can prepare a promotional eligibility list. Only the top 10 Captain candidates and top 15 Lieutenant candidates of the written examination will proceed to the assessment center process. 10.Contractor will supply materials used for assessment centers and provide expert testimony in court should the validity of an exam be legally challenged. 11.Contractor shall supply a detailed COVID-19 response to providing assessment centers while maintaining compliance with current Collective Bargaining Agreements. 12.Contractor will provide assessment center feedback to candidates. The purpose of this session will be to provide each candidate with his/her score, the areas in which he/she excelled and did poorly, and what he/she might do to improve his/her performance in the future. The results of the Assessment Center examination shall be binding for one year and, absent fraud, are not appealable to the Civil Service Commission or any other forum. 13.Contractor will use assessors selected by the Corpus Christi Police Association and approved by the Chief of Police. 14.Contractor will be the proprietary owner of all video and audio tapes utilized in the assessment center. 15.The price must include travel. Separate reimbursement will not be allowed for travel. 16.Contractor will abide by Tx Gov. Code 143, The City of Corpus Christi Civil Service Rules and Regulations, and current Collective Bargaining Agreements in the development and or administration of written examinations and assessment centers. Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C: INSURANCE AND BOND REQUIREMENTS I.CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE A.Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B.Contractor must furnish to the City’s Risk Manager and Contract Administer one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-day advance written notice of cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate ERRORS & OMISSIONS $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $1,000,000 Aggregate C.In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers’ compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers’ compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B.Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Page 1 of 3 Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: •List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; •Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; •Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and •Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E.Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F.In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G.Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property Page 2 of 3 resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this contract. H.It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I.It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. BONDS No bonds are required; therefore, Service Agreement Section 5(B) is hereby void. 2020 Insurance Requirements Ins. Req. Exhibit 3-L Professional Services – Errors & Omissions 04/14/2020 Risk Management – Legal Dept. Page 3 of 3 Page 1of 1 ATTACHMENT D: WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS No product warranty is required; therefore, Service Agreement Section 8(A)and (B) are hereby void. DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Eyvon McHaney, Director of Human Resources eyvonmc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3979 Robert Rocha, Fire Chief Rrocha@cctexas.com (361) 826-3935 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. of Oak Brook, Illinois, for a total amount not to exceed $409,915.00 for promotional testing services for the Corpus Christi Fire Department (CCFD) through the Human Resources Department, with FY 2021 funding in an amount of $68,000.00 available through the General Fund. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions. for promotional testing services for CCFD. This firm will provide design, validate, administer, score, and present the results of a promotional process that incorporates best practices currently used in the field of testing to assist CCFD in identifying incumbents who are best qualified for promotion to the ranks of Firefighter II EMS, Firefighter II Engineer, Captain, Battalion Chief and Assistant Chief. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The previous contract was with Dennis A. Joiner & Associates and was $17,232.68 for FY 2020. The selected consultant will develop the test. The selected consultant also will provide the City with experience and knowledge in test development and the Promotional Testing for Fire Department AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 administration of promotional examinations as well as legally defensible assessments of candidates, job analysis, and assessment center development and administration. The Consultant also will assist the City in maintaining compliance with Collective Bargaining Agreements, Local Government Code Chapter 143 and City of Corpus Christi Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulation. On September 28, 2020, the Contracts and Procurement Department issued a Request for Proposals to obtain qualified firms for promotional testing services with the RFQ Number 3228 for the Corpus Christi Fire Department. The City received a total of four Proposals. The selection committee consisted of representatives from the Police Department and the Human Resources Department. On December 2, 2020, the selection committee conducted interviews with all four of the firms that were recommended by the evaluation committee. Firms were ranked based on five factors: 1) firm’s experience and qualifications of firm; 2) experience and qualifications of the project manager and key staff; 3) project approach and management plan; 4) respondent capacity; and 5) respondent past performance. ALTERNATIVES: An alternative to not securing a three-year contract would be for the Human Resource Department to hire a consulting firm each time promotional testing must be conducted. The Human Resources Department would be required to do this to comply with the Fire Department’s Collective Bargaining agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for CCFD in FY 2021 is $68,000.00 for this three-year service agreement for promotional testing services. The remaining cost will be budgeted in future years through the annual budget process. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 1020 General Fund Organization/Activity: 12000 Fire Administration Mission Element: 093 Respond to Emergency Calls Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 530000 Professional Services RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. for promotional testing for the CCFD as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Evaluation Matrix RFP No.3228- Promotional Testing for the Fire Dept. Maria Pedraza Proposal Evaluation Minimum Qualifications Industrial Organizational Solutions CPS HR Consulting First Idea Inc. Dennis A. Joiner Assoicates Required ten years in Business No outstanding lawsuits during last 5 years or current litigation with the City during last 5 years No outstanding regulatory issues last 5 years References Provided for firm Technical Proposal Technical Proposal (50 points)47 41 43 41 Firms' Experience (18 points) Team Experience (18 points) Understanding of Project Scope (14 points) Interview Interview (30 points)28 27 26 22 Firms' Experience (8 points) Team Experience (10 points) Understanding of Project Scope (12 points) Price Price (20) 13 18 16 20 Total 88 86 85 83 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 1 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 3228 Promotional Testing for the City of Corpus Christi's Fire Department THIS Promotional Testing for the City of the Corpus Christi's Fire Department Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”) and Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. (“Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee (“City Manager”). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Promotional Testing for the City of Corpus Christi's Fire Department in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 3228 (“RFB/RFP”), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor’s bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Promotional Testing for the City of Corpus Christi's Fire Department (“Services”) in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for three years, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or the Contracts and Procurement Department, or the performance date listed in the notice to proceed, whichever is later. The parties may mutually extend the term of this Agreement for up to zero additional zero-year periods (“Option Period(s)”), provided, the parties do so by written amendment prior to the expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The City’s extension authorization must be executed by the City Manager or designee. 3.Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $409,915.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. Contractor shall invoice no more frequently than once per month. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Any amount not expended during the initial term or any option period may, at the City’s discretion, be allocated for use in the next option period. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 2 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 Invoices will be mailed to the following address with a copy provided to the Contract Administrator: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 4.Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City’s Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Eyvon McHaney Human Resources Phone: (361) 826-3979 Email: eyvonmc@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A)Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance (“COI”), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City’s Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days’ advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B)In the event that a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond’s terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The Service Agreement Standard Form Page 3 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. City may inspect all Services and products supplied before acceptance. Any Services or products that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item’s bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City’s invoice. 8. Warranty. (A) The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. (B)In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (C)Contractor warrants that all Services will be performed in accordance with the standard of care used by similarly situated contractors performing similar services. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City’s actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City’s product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City’s City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 4 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. In performing the Services, the Contractor will not enter into subcontracts or utilize the services of subcontractors. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other applicable taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Eyvon McHaney Director of Human Resources 1201 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Phone: (361) 826-3979 Fax: (361) 826-3322 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. Attn: Chad C. Legel, M.s. President & CEO 1520 Kensington Road, Suite 110, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Phone: (888) 784-1290 Fax: (708) 410-1558 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (“INDEMNITEES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT OF Service Agreement Standard Form Page 5 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS, OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES, WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR OR RESULTS FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING OR RESULTING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A)The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor’s failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B)Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19.Owner’s Manual and Preventative Maintenance. Contractor agrees to provide a copy of the owner’s manual and/or preventative maintenance guidelines or instructions if available for any equipment purchased by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor must provide such documentation upon delivery of such equipment and prior to receipt of the final payment by the City. 20.Limitation of Liability. The City’s maximum liability under this Agreement is limited to the total amount of compensation listed in Section 3 of this Agreement. In no event shall the City be liable for incidental, consequential or special damages. 21. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written Service Agreement Standard Form Page 6 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 22. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 23.Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A.this Agreement (excluding attachments and exhibits); B.its attachments; C.the bid solicitation document including any addenda (Exhibit 1); then, D.the Contractor’s bid response (Exhibit 2). 24.Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 “Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this Agreement if required by said statute. 25.Governing Law. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, Texas, and City laws in the performance of this Agreement. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 26.Public Information Act Requirements. This paragraph applies only to agreements that have a stated expenditure of at least $1,000,000 or that result in the expenditure of at least $1,000,000 by the City. The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Government Code, may apply to this contract and the Contractor agrees that the contract can be terminated if the Contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. 27.Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 7 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ________________________________________________ Josh Chronley Interim Assistant Director, Contracts and Procurement Date: _________________________ Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance and Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 3228 Exhibit 2: Contractor’s Bid/Proposal Response SCOPE OF WORK 1. General Requirements Contractor shall perform tasks, under the direction of Human Resources, associated with the development, statistical analysis, and assessment center process for promotional examinations of firefighters. The Contractor will also comply with Texas Government Code 143, City of Corpus Christi Civil Service rules and regulations, and Collective Bargaining Agreements (see Exhibit A), concerning Written Examinations and Asset Centers. 2. Scope of Work 1.The Contractor will professionally develop and supply a multiple choice 100 question written examination that will be administered by the Human Resources Department using sources that are provided and approved by the Civil Service Commission. The examination will be developed in a way that can be graded immediately following the exam. 2.Contractor shall deliver the written examination questions in a sealed and secured manner confidentially to the Human Resources Department. These include Firefighter II EMS, Firefighter II Engineer, Fire Captain, Battalion Chief, and Assistant Chief. 3.Contractor will provide to the Human Resources Director or designee as the Head of the Civil Service Commission a written response to any appealed test question. The response will be used on the City’s behalf in the Civil Service Commission meeting. The Commission will determine whether a test question will be deleted, changed, or has more than one answer. The decision rendered by the Commission is final and changes to grade will be made by the Human Resources Department. 4.Contractor will professionally develop and administer under the direction of the Human Resources Department an assessment center for the ranks of Battalion Chief and Assistant Chief using a minimum of three exercises which adequately assesses measurable dimensions of the job analysis. The assessment center will count 60 percent of the total score and will be graded in a way that will go out at least two decimal points to eliminate any possible ties. 5.Contractor will develop the job analysis using equivalent and/or higher ranks within the Corpus Christi Fire Department as subject matter experts. Coordination and selection of the SME’s will be the responsibility of the Human Resources Department. ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 2 6.Contractor will provide assessors training in the administration and grading process for a minimum eight hours prior to conducting the assessment center. 7.Contractor will provide a classroom style orientation to candidates on general information of the assessment center process. 8.Contractor will comply with providing within 24 hours of the conclusion of the entire Assessment Center process, excluding weekends and City-observed holidays, the grading for the assessment center so that Human Resources can prepare a promotional eligibility list. Only the top 10 of the written examination will proceed to the assessment center process. 9.Contractor will supply materials used for assessment centers and provide expert testimony in court should the validity of an exam be legally challenged. 10.Contractor shall supply a detailed COVID-19 response to providing assessment centers while maintaining compliance with current Collective Bargaining Agreements. 11.Contractor will provide assessment center feedback to candidates. The purpose of this session will be to provide each candidate with his/her score, the areas in which he/she excelled and did poorly, and what he/she might do to improve his/her performance in the future. The results of the Assessment Center examination shall be binding for one year and, absent fraud, are not appealable to the Civil Service Commission or any other forum. 12.The Contractor may provide a list of six possible assessors to Human Resources. The Fire Chief and Fire Association have the right to strike any assessor with good reason and provide a replacement. 13.Contractor will be the proprietary owner of any and all video and audio tapes should they be utilized in the assessment center. 14.The price must include travel. Separate reimbursement will not be allowed for travel. 15.Contractor will abide by Tx Gov. Code 143, The City of Corpus Christi Civil Service Rules and Regulations, and current Collective Bargaining Agreements in the development and or administration of written examinations and assessment centers. Page 2 of 2 Attachment B ATTACHMENT C: INSURANCE AND BOND REQUIREMENTS I.CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE A.Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B.Contractor must furnish to the City’s Risk Manager and Contract Administer one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-day advance written notice of cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate ERRORS & OMISSIONS $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $1,000,000 Aggregate C.In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers’ compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers’ compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B.Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Page 1 of 3 Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: •List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; •Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; •Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and •Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E.Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F.In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G.Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property Page 2 of 3 resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this contract. H.It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I.It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. BONDS No bonds are required; therefore, Service Agreement Section 5(B) is hereby void. 2020 Insurance Requirements Ins. Req. Exhibit 3-L Professional Services – Errors & Omissions 04/14/2020 Risk Management – Legal Dept. Page 3 of 3 Page 1of 1 ATTACHMENT D: WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS No product warranty is required; therefore, Service Agreement Section 8(A)and (B) are hereby void. DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Eyvon McHaney, Director of Human Resources EyvonMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3979 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing a two-year service agreement for executive recruitment services in an amount not to exceed $294,000.00 with payment only when services are rendered with Baker Tilly US, LLP of Plano, Texas, for the recruitment of hard to fill executive-level positions to be used by City departments through the Human Resources Department, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed, FY 2021 funding is available in various funds. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes a two-year service agreement for recruitment services of hard to fill executive-level positions to be used by City departments. The Human Resources Department will oversee and manage the contract, as they work directly with the departments requesting recruitment services. This contract will allow for the development of a large pooling of qualified executive-level candidates to fill vacant executive-level positions across City departments. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The current process for utilizing an Executive search firm requires an adhoc Request for Quote (RFQ) as a specialty one-time recruitment item which is more expensive and adds four to six weeks to the recruitment timeline for each recruitment need. Having a contract in place with one firm will provide immediate availability of recruitment sources with Executive-Level Recruitment Services AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 competitive and discounted pricing. Executive search firms specialize in the recruitment and selection process of key professionals and executive leaders for public sector organizations and develop customized search strategies that focus on locating and recruiting highly qualified candidates to match the organizations’ needs. These search firms employ full-time executive recruiters who have a proactive approach in identifying and recruiting top talent across the country and maintaining a robust database of candidates to meet clients’ needs. They also work to continuously build an extensive network of external resources for leveraging executive-level talent. This service will only be used on an as needed basis for Executive positions that are difficult to fill or are considered a specialized skill set. It is mission critical to the City that leadership positions are filled with the best available talent as quickly and reliably as possible in order to reduce the negative effects of vacant executive-level positions. On November 02, 2020, the Contracts and Procurement Department issued a Request for Proposals for the Human Resources Department with the RFP Number 3334 for Executive Recruitment Services. The City received a total of six Proposals. The selection committee consisted of representatives from the City Manager’s Office, the Human Resources Department, and the Aviation Department. On January 21, 2021, the selection committee conducted interviews for four of the firms that were recommended by the evaluation committee. Firms were ranked based on five factors: 1) firm’s experience and qualifications of firm; 2) experience and qualifications of the project manager and key staff; 3) project approach and management plan; 4) respondent capacity; and 5) respondent past performance. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative would be to conduct the recruitment using City staff. The City recruitment staff has very limited access to national recruitment resources, tools, and the broad professional networks of executive-level candidates. FISCAL IMPACT: The City only will be charged if services are rendered, at which time appropriate funding sources will be identified. FUNDING DETAIL: Recruitment Services will be utilized for executive-level positions for various City departments on an as-needed basis. City departments requesting the recruitment services provide through this agreement will be responsible for the funding associated with the placement of the position(s). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing a two-year service agreement with Baker Tilly US, LLP for recruitment services as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Evaluation Matrix Service Agreement RFP NO. 3334 RECRUITMENT SERVICES MARIA PEDRAZA (KIM BAKER) Proposal Evaluation BAKER TILLY SGR GOVHR PEARSON PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. RAFTELIS ABACUS SERVICE CORPORATION MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS (PASS/FAIL) Required five years in business performing same services No outstanding lawsuits during last 5 years or current litigation with the City during last 5 years No outstanding regulatory issues last 5 years References Provided for firm TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (50 PTS)46 43 43 34 32 27 Firms' Experience Team's Experience Understanding of Project Scope INTERVIEW (30 PTS)30 22 15 0 0 0 Firms' Experience Team identification Understanding of Project Scope PRICING (20 PTS)16 20 15 0 0 0 Total 92 85 73 34 32 27 PassPassPassPassPassPass Service Agreement Standard Form Page 1 of 9 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 3334 RECRUITMENT SERVICES THIS Recruitment Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”) and Baker Tilly US, LLP (“Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee (“City Manager”). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Recruitment Services in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 3334 (“RFB/RFP”), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor’s bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1.Scope. Contractor will provide Recruitment Services (“Services”) in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2.Term. This Agreement is for two years, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or the Contracts and Procurement Department. The parties may mutually extend the term of this Agreement for up to zero additional zero-month periods (“Option Period(s)”), provided, the parties do so by written amendment prior to the expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The City’s extension authorization must be executed by the City Manager or designee. 3.Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $294,000.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. Contractor shall invoice no more frequently than once per month. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Any amount not expended during the initial term or any option period may, at the City’s discretion, be allocated for use in the next option period. Invoices will be mailed to the following address with a copy provided to the Contract Administrator: DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 2 of 9 City of Corpus Christi Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City’s Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Tracey Lawson Human Resources Phone: 361.826.3314 Email: traceyl@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Reserved. (B) Reserved. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. City may inspect all Services and products supplied before acceptance. Any Services or products that are provided but not Accepted by the City due to substantial non-conformance with any specifications must be corrected or re-worked at no charge to the City. The City must provide Contractor prompt written notice of any such non-conformity within thirty (30) days following delivery of such Services, and Contractor shall have a reasonable period of time, based on the severity and complexity of the non- conformance, to correct the non-conformance so that the Services substantially conform to the specifications. 8. Warranty. (A) Reserved. DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 3 of 9 (B) Reserved. (C) Contractor warrants that all Services will be performed in accordance with the standard of care used by similarly situated contractors performing similar services. (D) Except as provided in Attachment A, this section 8 is Contractor’s only warranty concerning the Services, and is made expressly in lieu of all other warranties and representations, express or implied, including any implied warranties of merchantability, accuracy, title, non-infringement, or fitness for a particular purpose, or otherwise. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City’s actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City’s product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City’s City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind the City to any third-party agreement. Though the Services may include Contractor’s advice and recommendations, all final hiring decisions shall be the responsibility of, and made by, the City. 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator unless the subcontractors were named in the bid or proposal or in an Attachment to this Agreement, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 4 of 9 requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. The City may, at the City’s sole discretion, choose not to accept Services performed by a subcontractor that was not approved in accordance with this paragraph. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other applicable taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Tracey Lawson Human Resources Recruitment Manager 1201 Leopard Street, 2nd Floor, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Phone: (361) 826-3314 Fax: (361) 826-3322 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Baker Tilly US, LLP Attn: Chuck Rohre Title: Director Address: 2500 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300, Plano, Texas 75093 Phone: 972.748.0300 Fax: 214.452.1165 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (“INDEMNITEES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 5 of 9 WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION TO THE EXTENT RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR DEATH, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES, WHICH ARISE OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR OR RESULTS FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL REASONABLE CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING OR RESULTING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. (A) Each Party recognizes and agrees that the warranty disclaimers and liability and remedy limitations in this Agreement are material bargained for bases of this Agreement and that they have been taken into account and reflected in determining the consideration to be given by each party under this Agreement and in the decision by each party to enter into this Agreement. (B) The terms of Sections 17 and 20 shall apply regardless of the nature of any claim asserted (including, but not limited to, contract, tort, or any form of negligence, whether of the City, Contractor or others), but these terms shall not apply to the extent finally determined to be contrary to the applicable law or regulation. These terms shall also continue to apply after any termination of this Agreement. (C) Each Party accepts and acknowledges that any legal proceedings arising from or in conjunction with the Services provided under this Agreement must be commenced within the applicable statute of limitations. DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 6 of 9 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor’s failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. (C) In the event that the City fails to comply with any material terms of this Agreement, including failure to pay any amounts required, the Contractor may give the City written notice of the breach and set out a 60-day cure period. If the City has not cured within the cure period, the Contractor may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. 19. Owner’s Manual and Preventative Maintenance. Reserved. 20. Limitation of Liability. Except as provided in Section 17, each Party’s maximum liability under this Agreement (including attorney’s fees and all other costs) is limited to the total amount of compensation listed in Section 3 of this Agreement, provided, however, that Contractor’s liability shall not be limited in any way to the extent finally determined to have resulted from the willful misconduct or fraudulent behavior of Contractor relating to such Services. This limitation of liability is intended to apply to the full extent allowed by law, regardless of the grounds or nature of any claim asserted, including the negligence of either Party. In no event shall either Party be liable for incidental, consequential or special damages even if such Party has been made aware of the possibility of such damages. 21. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 22. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 7 of 9 operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 23. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement (excluding attachments and exhibits); B. its attachments; C. the bid solicitation document including any addenda (Exhibit 1); then, D. the Contractor’s bid response (Exhibit 2). 24. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 “Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this Agreement if required by said statute. 25. Governing Law. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, Texas, and City laws in the performance of this Agreement. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. THE PARTIES EXPRESSLY WAIVE TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY JUDICIAL PROCEEDING INVOLVING, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ANY MATTER (WHETHER SOUNDING IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE) IN ANY WAY ARISING OUT OF, RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE RELATIONSHIP ESTABLISHED HEREUNDER. 26. Public Information Act Requirements. Reserved. 27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. 28. Contractor Entity. Baker Tilly US, LLP is an independent member of Baker Tilly International. Baker Tilly International Limited is an English company. Baker Tilly International provides no professional services to clients. Each member firm is a separate and independent legal entity and each describes itself as such. Baker Tilly US, LLP is not Baker Tilly International’s agent and does not have the authority to bind Baker Tilly International or act on Baker Tilly International’s behalf. None of Baker Tilly International, Baker Tilly US, LLP, nor any of the other member firms of Baker Tilly International has any liability for each other’s acts or omissions. The name Baker Tilly and its associated logo is used under license from Baker Tilly DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 8 of 9 International Limited. 29.Confidential Information. The Parties acknowledge that the City is a Texas governmental entity subject to the Texas Public Information Act (the “Act”). In the event that Contractor provides any information that it considers confidential or proprietary to the City under this Agreement (“Confidential Information”), the Contractor should clearly mark each page provided as “confidential” or “proprietary.” Should City receive a request for disclosure of Confidential Information pursuant to the Act, City will promptly provide Contractor notice of such request so that Contractor may avail itself of any opportunities to establish reasons why the information should be withheld prior to disclosing such Confidential Information. The burden of establishing the applicability of exceptions to the disclosure of Information under the Act resides with Contractor. Should Contractor be unable to establish a valid exception from disclosure or exclusion from the Act, then City may release the information, solely to the extent necessary to comply with the Act. [Signature Page to Follow] DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 9 of 9 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI _______________________________________________ Josh Chronley Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement Date: _________________________ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: _____________________________________________________ Assistant City Attorney Date For City Attorney Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 3334 Exhibit 2: Contractor’s Bid/Proposal Response DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Firm Director 2/26/2021 Chuck Rohre Scope of Work 1. General Requirements A.The Contractor will develop a rich pool of qualified candidates for the selection of Executive level positions across City departments on an as needed basis. The Contractor shall be responsible for the entire process from assessing the City’s needs to ensuring the selected candidate is successfully acclimated in the job. The Contractor shall be responsible for the development of recruitment materials, recruitment of candidates including background investigations, assistance in analyzing applications, and assistance in the interview and selection process. The Contractor shall have a successful track record working with local governments, and more specifically with the placement of Department Directors and Executive leaders in City Manager government structures. B.The objective is to provide open and fair recruitments that will attract a talented pool of qualified candidates with a proven background in City Leadership from diverse backgrounds throughout the United States. The Contractor will provide the City’s search committee with multiple, qualified candidates for consideration for each individual recruitment as needed over the course of the contract. 2. Background A.The City of Corpus Christi is a coastal city located on the Southeastern coast of Texas on the Gulf of Mexico and is a full-service municipality governed by a Council-Manager form of government since 1945. It is the eighth largest city in Texas and the sixtieth largest city in the United States. Corpus Christi also has the fourth largest port in total tonnage in the nation. The City Council is the City's Legislative body and is composed of the Mayor, one Member from each of the five Districts, and three At-Large Members. The citizens elect each to a two-year term. B.The City has 34 departments and employs approximately 3,000 employees. Executive positions included under this contract will include but are not limited to Assistant Director, Deputy Director, Department Director, Executive Director, Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, Chief of Staff, City Manager, Fire Chief/Police Chief. ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 3. Scope of Work A.The Contractor shall provide services including, but not limited to, those outlined below for each position that the City needs filled during the term of the contract: 1.Defining the position profile a.Extensively consult with the Human Resources Department, City Manager’s Office, key staff, stakeholders and community members to determine the City’s vision/mission, goals and objectives, needs and issues, requirements of the job, and to obtain information about the environment in which the position functions. b.Based on the above meetings, identify the preferred management style, personal traits, demonstrated performance criteria, and previous accomplishments of the successful candidate. c.Develop a professional recruitment brochure that will include information on the City, the department, challenges and issues, the position, and selection criteria. 2.Sourcing qualified candidates a.Place advertisements in professional journals, websites, newspapers, and diversity oriented specialty publications. b.Conduct referrals and cold sourcing. 3.Evaluating prospective candidates a.Develop a preliminary screening and progress report based on education, experience, technical knowledge, accomplishments, management style, personal traits, any other criteria included in the position profile. b.Include any issues/complaints/charges/litigation that are pending or are in the candidate’s history. c.Meet with the City at times and locations designated by the City in order to provide progress reports on the numbers of semifinalist candidates and recommend a list of semifinalists. d.Provide the City with electronic copies of all resumes/applications received during this search. 4.Selection of finalists a.Conduct personal interviews of semifinalists (approximately 5-10). b.Conduct in-depth background screenings of the semifinalists including credit checks, criminal and civil histories, driving records, college degrees and other related professional certifications, internet character searches, and detailed and extensive reference checks of job performances, Page 2 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 management styles, personal traits and other any additional factors as they relate to this position. c.Present a report in a format to be specified by the City with recommendations of finalists to be interviewed by City staff and other selected panel members. The report shall include, but not be limited to: i. Education, certifications, and experience information for each finalist ii. Evaluation of each finalist’s experience relative to selection criteria iii. Summary of reference comments iv. Statements demonstrating accomplishments and management styles v. Present salary/compensation and salary expectations for each finalist. 5.Identification of top candidate Facilitate interviews with finalists by the City Manager’s Executive team or their designated group, key stakeholders, panels, town hall meetings and other groups and locations as designated by the City. 6.Selection of top candidate Assist with any employment or compensation negotiations with the City once the top candidate has been identified, as required. 7.Additional requirements a.All recruiting costs associated with its work, including marketing, advertising fees, travel, lodging, meals, and any incidental costs for its employees shall be included in the contract pricing. b.Coordinate and pay directly for all costs related to candidate travel, meals and lodging for interviews and seek reimbursement from the City based on approved City travel policies. c.Provide the City with all materials related to the search in the amounts, at the times, and in the forms requested by the City. B.Guarantee the position for one year. If the selected candidate for which the Contractor is paid to conduct the executive search, leaves for any reason during the first 12 months of employment with the City, the Contractor shall immediately conduct a search for a replacement candidate. Within eight weeks of the request from the City for the replacement search, a slate of qualified candidates shall be submitted to the City. If the firm is unable to provide the candidates as stated above, the firm shall refund the fee paid by the City. C.Complete all the work required herein for each requested recruitment within 120 days of notification from Human Resources unless directed otherwise by the City. Page 3 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 ATTACHMENT B Total Price $294,000.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT C: INSURANCE AND BOND REQUIREMENTS No insurance or bonds are required; therefore, Service Agreement Section 5(A) and (B) is hereby void. DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 Page 1of 1 ATTACHMENT D: WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS No product warranty is required: therefore, Service Agreement Section 8(A)and (B) are hereby void. DocuSign Envelope ID: 67C7E1E7-4665-4E8C-9F8D-C3B9E79BC644 DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Kevin Norton, Director of Water Utilities KevinN@cctexas.com (361) 826-1874 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement Joshc2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION Motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Gulf Coast Security Enterprises LLC of New Orleans, Louisiana, in an amount not to exceed $145,890.00 for Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach, with FY 2021 funding in an estimated amount of $32,420.00 available through the Utilities Department Water Fund. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes a three-year service agreement for armed security guard services and on-site monitoring for Sunrise Beach between the hours of 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Sunrise Beach Park is located approximately four miles southwest of Mathis and at the north end of Wesley E. Seale Dam. The Park is 33.5 acres in size and has approximately one mile of shoreline on Lake Corpus Christi. Sunrise Beach Park was operated by private individuals under contract with the City of Corpus Christi Water Department until January 1, 2009, when the Water Department a ssumed operation of the Park. Currently, Sunrise Beach staff calls the San Patricio County Sheriff Department for law enforcement assistance. The security guard, under this service agreement, will be assigned to monitor the front gate allowing only paid customers entry and will enforce and deliver eviction and non-compliance notices when required. Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach for the Utilities Department AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 The Contracts and Procurement Department conducted a competitive Request for Bids process to obtain bids. The City received four responsive, responsible bids and one non- responsive bid. Staff is recommending award to the lowest, responsible bidder, Gulf Coast Security Enterprises LLC of New Orleans, Louisiana. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative to accepting this bid would be to call the San Patricio County Sheriff Department for law enforcement needs. However, the risk of problems escalating without a security guard on-site would continue to exist. A security guard on-site will assist in resolving problems as quickly as possible and will be familiar with the daily clientele. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for the Utilities Department is an amount not to exceed $32,420.00 for the first year of the three-year service agreement from the FY 2021 Water Fund, with the remaining cost of $113,470.00 to be budgeted in future years through the annual budget process. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 4010 Water Fund Organization/Activity: 31010 O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Mission Element: 062 Treat Water Project # (CIP Only): N/A Accounts: 530215 Maintenance & repairs – Contracted RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing a three-year service agreement with Gulf Coast Security Enterprises, LLC for Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Bid Tabulation ITEM Description Annual Qty Unit Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Estimated hours of security service required for 12 months: 1 Armed Guard – Sun-Sat (3pm-11pm) 2920 HRS 15.00$ 43,800.00$ 21.44$ 62,604.80$ 22.80$ 66,576.00$ 2 Armed Guard: Miscellaneous Hours 100 HRS 15.00$ 15.00$ 21.44$ 2,144.00$ 22.80$ 2,280.00$ 3 Armed Guard: Overtime Hours 100 HRS 22.50$ 2,250.00$ 31.09$ 3,109.00$ 34.20$ 3,420.00$ 4 Armed Guard: Holiday Hours 48 HRS 22.50$ 1,080.00$ 31.09$ 1,492.32$ 34.20$ 1,641.60$ 1 Year Total 46,065.00$ 69,350.12$ 73,917.60$ 3 Year Total 138,195.00$ 208,050.36$ 221,752.80$ Corrected to 145,890.00$ ITEM Description Annual Qty Unit Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Estimated hours of security service required for 12 months: 1 Armed Guard – Sun-Sat (3pm-11pm) 2920 HRS 25.85$ 75,482.00$ -$ -$ 2 Armed Guard: Miscellaneous Hours 100 HRS 38.78$ 3,878.00$ -$ -$ 3 Armed Guard: Overtime Hours 100 HRS 38.78$ 3,878.00$ -$ -$ 4 Armed Guard: Holiday Hours 48 HRS 38.78$ 1,861.44$ -$ -$ 1 Year Total 85,099.44$ -$ 3 Year Total 255,298.32$ Non- Responsive -$ * - Non-Responsive ** - Corrected Math Error Line Item 2: Total Price from $15.00 to $1500.00 1 Year Total $46,065.00 to $48,630.00 3 Year Total $ 138,195.00 to $ 145,890.00 City of Corpus Christi Contracts and Procurement Department Buyer : Marco Lozano Bid Tabulation RFB # 3300 Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach * International Security Agency, Inc. - San Juan, Tx. Base Security & Fire Consultants. Inc. - Rosenberg, Tx ** Gulf Coast Security Enterprises, LLC - New Orleans, LA. Alert Patrol, Inc. - Margate, FL Vets Securing America - San Antonio, Tx. Service Agreement Standard Form Page 1 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 3300 Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach THIS Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”) and Gulf Coast Security Enterprises, LLC (“Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee (“City Manager”). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 3300 (“RFB/RFP”), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor’s bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Armed Security Guard Services for Sunrise Beach (“Services”) in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for three years, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or the Contracts and Procurement Department, or the performance date listed in the notice to proceed, whichever is later. The parties may mutually extend the term of this Agreement for up to zero additional zero-year periods (“Option Period(s)”), provided, the parties do so by written amendment prior to the expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The City’s extension authorization must be executed by the City Manager or designee. 3. Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $145,890.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. Contractor shall invoice no more frequently than once per month. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Any amount not expended during the initial term or any option period may, at the City’s discretion, be allocated for use in the next option period. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 2 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 Invoices will be mailed to the following address with a copy provided to the Contract Administrator: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City’s Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Name: Diana Zertuche-Garza Department: Utilities Phone: 361-886-1827 Email: DianaG@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance (“COI”), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City’s Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days’ advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event that a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond’s terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 3 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. City may inspect all Services and products supplied before acceptance. Any Services or products that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item’s bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City’s invoice. 8. Warranty. (A) The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. (B) In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (C) Contractor warrants that all Services will be performed in accordance with the standard of care used by similarly situated contractors performing similar services. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City’s actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City’s product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City’s City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 4 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. In performing the Services, the Contractor will not enter into subcontracts or utilize the services of subcontractors. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other applicable taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Diana Zertuche-Garza Title: Contracts/Funds Administrator Address: 2726 Holly Rd., Corpus Christi, TX 78415 Phone: 361-886-1827 Fax: N/A IF TO CONTRACTOR: Gulf Coast Security Enterprises, LLC Attn: Tommie Landrum Title: President Address: 141 Robert Lee Blvd #222, New Orleans, Louisiana 70124 Phone: 504-265-8610 Fax: 601-510-9381 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (“INDEMNITEES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT OF DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 5 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS, OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES, WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR OR RESULTS FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING OR RESULTING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor’s failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Owner’s Manual and Preventative Maintenance. Contractor agrees to provide a copy of the owner’s manual and/or preventative maintenance guidelines or instructions if available for any equipment purchased by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor must provide such documentation upon delivery of such equipment and prior to receipt of the final payment by the City. 20. Limitation of Liability. The City’s maximum liability under this Agreement is limited to the total amount of compensation listed in Section 3 of this Agreement. In no event shall the City be liable for incidental, consequential or special damages. 21. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 6 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 22. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 23. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement (excluding attachments and exhibits); B. its attachments; C. the bid solicitation document including any addenda (Exhibit 1); then, D. the Contractor’s bid response (Exhibit 2). 24. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 “Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this Agreement if required by said statute. 25. Governing Law. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, Texas, and City laws in the performance of this Agreement. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 26. Public Information Act Requirements. This paragraph applies only to agreements that have a stated expenditure of at least $1,000,000 or that result in the expenditure of at least $1,000,000 by the City. The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Government Code, may apply to this contract and the Contractor agrees that the contract can be terminated if the Contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. 27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 7 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ________________________________________________ Josh Chronley Interim Assistant Director, Contracts and Procurement Date: _________________________ Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance and Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 3300 Exhibit 2: Contractor’s Bid/Proposal Response DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Tommie Landrum 1/14/2021 President ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE OF WORK 1.1 General Requirements A. The Contractor shall provide armed security guard services, “on-site” monitoring of Sunrise Beach as specifically outlined in Scope of Work. Requirements for patrolling this area shall be as outlined in this Scope of Work. B. Type of Security - The Security Guard shall be armed with a firearm. Any nightstick, baton, billy club, flashlight, or other device which might be construed as a protective weapon which the Contractor may wish the Security Guard to carry, must be specifically approved in advance by the Contract Administrator. C. Identification - Contractor must provide the Security Guard a certified identification card. The Security Guard of the Contractor shall be required to wear a Contractor- provided photo identification card at all times. Contractor shall provide to the Contract Administrator a list containing the name(s) and a passport-size photograph of the Security Guard assigned to duty. Contractor shall keep such list with photographs current at all times. No “trainees” will be allowed in place of Security Guards. D. Experience – The Security Guard assigned to duty at Sunrise Beach must have a minimum of one year’s experience and be a commissioned Level 3 Uniformed Security Guard and must have been employed by Contractor for a minimum of one year. The Contractor must provide Contract Administrator proof of years of experience. The Contract Administrator reserves the right to waive these requirements if Contractor can provide “good reason” concerning experience or time employed. E. Drug Testing – The Contractor must use a drug testing laboratory certified by the Federal Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and must follow United States Department of Transportation Procedures identified in 49 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 40. Moreover, chain-of-custody procedures will be followed to account for the integrity of each specimen by tracking its handling and storage from point of specimen collection to final disposition of the specimen. Each specimen submitted for testing will be assayed for the presence of the following compounds: DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 EMIT SCREEN GC/MS CONFIRMATION DETECTION LEVEL DETECTION LEVEL DRUG GROUP ng/ml* ng/ml* Amphetamines 500 250 Barbiturates 300-1000** 200 Benzodiazepines 300 200 Cocaine Metabolites 150 100 Marijuana Metabolites 50 15 Methadone 300 200 Methaqualone 300 200 Opiate Metabolites 300 300 Phencyclidine 25 25 Propoxyphene 300 200 * nonograms/milliliter ** The limit of detection varies according to the specific drug and/or metabolite(s) present. The Contractor shall conduct drug testing prior to assignment and placement and will conduct random drug tests, in compliance this scope of work, on the Security Guard assigned to duty. Contractor shall review all drug tests. Any employee of the Contractor failing a drug test shall not be assigned to duty. Contractor will provide the written results of any drug test within 24 hours of City’s request for same. F. Background Checks – 1. At Contractor’s expense, and as a prerequisite to placement, Contractor shall perform background and credit investigations on any Security Guard assigned to Sunrise Beach and furnish the results of same to the Contract Administrator, or designee, who will determine each prospective guard’s eligibility for placement with the City, prior to Contractor making placement. Contractor’s failure to provide written proof, acceptable to the Contract Administrator, that the above- described background and credit checks were conducted for each any Security Guard prior to placement and are favorable for placement, shall result in the City deducting $500, for each such unauthorized placement, from the invoice applicable to the month in which such unauthorized placement(s) was/were made. 2. Credit Investigations - All credit investigations shall be conducted on a national basis and shall reflect “Actual” credit history. For the Security Guards who has resided solely in the State of Texas for the ten years immediately preceding their placement with the City, the Contractor need only conduct a State of Texas background check which shall DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 consist of a search for criminal convictions at the state level and in those counties in which said employee has resided. For the Security Guards who has who has resided outside the State of Texas at any time and for any duration of time during the ten years immediately preceding placement with the City, the Contractor shall conduct a national background check which shall consist of a search of the following for criminal convictions: federal records and records of the states and counties/parishes in which said prospective Security Guard has resided in the ten years immediately preceding placement with the City. All background checks shall search for criminal convictions and Also-Known- As (AKA). 3. Any Security Guard assigned to Sunrise Beach must also comply with all Police Department security checks. 4. An employee of the Contractor failing a background or Police Department check or who, in the opinion of the Contractor or the City, has an abnormally high debt-to-earnings ratio, shall not be assigned to duty at any City facility. G. Smoke Free - All City Facilities are “Smoke Free” buildings. Therefore, no smoking is allowed by employees, contractors, vendors, visitors, or anyone within the building, including Contractor’s employees. H. Training/Customer Service - Any Security Guard assigned to duty shall be trained and undergo periodic refresher training in the following areas: 1. Red Cross-Certified First Aid procedures and resuscitation. Procedures including the use of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the Heimlich maneuver. Proof of training for each assigned Security Guard must be submitted to the Contract Administrator. 2. Communication procedures including the use of portable two-way radio equipment and cellular telephones. 3. Police procedures in: public relations, facility security, personal safety, emergency management, personal assaults, disorderly conduct, public intoxication, juvenile delinquency, patrolling and surveillance and reporting techniques. 4. The Contractor will make sure any Security Guard assigned is trained to write and maintain daily reports, including, but not limited to, those detailed in this scope of work. Security Guards will be trained to document activities or problems in City Facilities, as well as, properly DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 complete accident or incident reports covering mishaps, unusual events, unexpected occurrences, and the like. 1.2 Contract Employees Contractor’s Security Guard assigned to Sunrise Beach will conduct themselves in a businesslike and professional manner at all times. The Contractor expressly agrees to remove from duty any Security Guard whose continued employment is deemed by the Contract Administrator to be contrary to the public interest or inconsistent with the best interest of the City. 1.3 Identification of Contract Employees All of the Contractor’s employees regularly employed as a Security Guard assigned to Sunrise Beach or in the direct supervision of said Security Guard under this Contract shall be identified by a distinctive uniform complete with photo badge and name tag identifying each employee individually. 1.4 Pre-Performance Conference Prior to commencing work under the Contract, the Contractor shall meet in conference with the Contract Administrator to develop mutual understandings relative to this contract and to provide for a smooth assumption of duties. 1.5 Damage or Loss of Property The Contractor is responsible for taking action to protect City supplies and equipment and the personal property of its employees from loss, theft, damage, or tampering. 1.6 Invoicing Instructions Contractor's invoices will be submitted to the Contract Administrator within five working days following the end of each calendar month in which services are performed. Upon verification of the work performed and charges, the Contract Administrator will process the invoices for payment. 1.7 Emergency Procedures Contractor shall be thoroughly familiar with Emergency Procedures Manuals for all Facilities. The Contractor and each Security Guard shall observe and enforce all building Fire and Safety regulations including but not limited to those regarding smoking and shall be cognizant of and observe all requirements for handling and storage of combustible waste, trash, etc. Contractor shall promptly report all infractions of these rules and requirements to the Contractor Administrator. 1.8 Contractor Quality Control The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Contract are provided as specified. All new Security Guards duties will be personally supervised by an experienced Security Guard for not less than the initial 16 hours the new Security Guard is on duty, to familiarize the new Security Guard with procedures before assuming independent duty. At least twice annually, the Contractor will conduct a comprehensive inspection of security operations, requirements, and weaknesses or problems. The results of this inspection will be compiled in a formal report, a copy of which will be given to the Contract Administrator, twice annually. The report will highlight current Contract performance and recommended solutions will be provided for any perceived problem areas. 1.9 City Quality Assurance All phases of the services rendered under this Contract are subject to the inspection and approval of the Contract Administrator. If the Contractor's overall performance is unsatisfactory, the Contract Administrator will so notify the Contractor in writing. The Contractor shall reply to such notice in writing within three working days with an outline or plan of corrective action which must be acceptable to the Contract Administrator, or designee. Contractor's continued unsatisfactory performance shall be sufficient cause for termination of this contract. 1.10 Facility Specific Requirements Services will be provided at 22825 Park Rd 25, Mathis, Texas. An Armed Security Guard will be assigned to monitor the front gate allowing only paid customers entry. Patrol of assigned area is required on an hourly basis. The Security Guard must become familiar with Park rules to help enforce and deliver eviction and non-compliance notices when required. Security inspections of restroom facilities must be performed on a daily basis at 10:00pm. 1.11 Work Site and Conditions The work shall be performed at 22825 Park Road 25, Mathis, Texas. The hours services are required are Sunday through Saturday from 3:00pm to 11:00pm which includes national holidays. Patrol of the main gate and RV Park which accommodates up to 75 trailers is required. Work may need to be performed in all types of weather conditions. 1.12 Installed Systems The following systems are to be monitored for location: 1. Security Cameras 2. Pin code activation security gates 1.13 Reports Sunrise Beach will require additional reporting of issues or findings including but not limited to water leaks, septic, and electrical issues. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 1.14 Facilities and Equipment Provided by the City The City will provide a logbook and pens for the guard on duty. No other equipment will be provided by the City. 1.15 Contractor Furnished Supplies and Equipment The Contractor shall furnish handgun and vehicle. 1.16 Security Guard Access to the Building Will only have access to security post and restroom facilities. 1.17 Special Instructions to the Contractor A. The Contract Administrator will provide special instructions pertaining to the smooth and efficient operation of Security Guard Surveillance and monitoring services. Such instructions will be provided in three categories: 1. Written standing instructions which will be directives of a permanent nature that will remain in force until formally changed or canceled. These will be instructions that pertain to the normal operation and preservation of good order and efficiency within the building and environs for all Facilities. 2. Written temporary instructions will be related to the specific event or operation which is expected to be completed during a specific time frame. These instructions will normally be canceled on completion of the event or operation for which they are written. 3. Verbal temporary instructions will be provided to the Contractor by the Contract Administrator, or designee, to address unforeseen incidents or problems which may develop. They will pertain only to the specific situation for which they are provided. B. While it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to carry out such special instructions given by the Contractor Administrator, it is the obligation of the Contractor to offer comment or recommendations regarding any such instructions which may bear improvement or be contrary to established security practices. Such comment or recommendation may be given verbally but must be followed by written notice to the Contract Administrator from the Contractor. C. Special instructions to the Contractor will be given only by the Contract administrator or designee specified in writing. Further, the City agrees that any claims arising from third parties against the Contractor for acts and/or omissions directed by the City and giving rise to such claims are the responsibility of the City unless negligence or malpractice on the part of the Contractor or any Security DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Guard is indicated. Each party waives any and all rights of recovery against the other party for damage to the premises or loss of property as a result of fire or force majeure except in instances involving the negligence or malpractice of either party. 1.18 City Contract Administrator The Contract Administrator shall be the single point of contact for the Contractor for all matters and shall keep all records pertaining to this contract. The Contract Administrator shall approve all phases of performance and operations under this Contract including authorization for payment. The Contract Administrator or his/her designee shall be the single point of contact for the Contractor for all matters. The Contract Administrator may change over time and any such changes will be given to the Contractor in writing. Sunrise Beach Building Contact David Lozano Wesley Seale Dam 299 County Rd. 365. 361-826-1271 DavidLoz@cctexas.com DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 -------------------$1500.00 $ 48,630.00--------------- $ 145,890.00---------------- * Corrected Decimal Dispalcement and math errors. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Rest Room Rest Room Guard Post DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT C: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City’s Risk Manager and Purchasing Director one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-day advance written notice of cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises – Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non-Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS’S COMPENSATION Employers Liability Statutory $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Page 2 of 3 II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers’ compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers’ compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination in coverage and DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Page 3 of 3 not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. Section 5. Bonds. (B) is null to this agreement 2020 Insurance Requirements Ins. Req. Exhibit 4-B Contracts for General Services – Services Performed Onsite 06/08/2020 Risk Management – Legal Dept. DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT D: WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS Section 8. Warranty. (A) & (B) is null to this Service Agreement DocuSign Envelope ID: AC871281-9CFF-4EEA-B671-37669C65C625 DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: David S. Lehfeldt, Director of Solid Waste Services DavidL3@cctexas.com (361) 826-1966 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the lease-purchase of one roll-off truck from Lonestar Freightliner Group, LLC of Waco, Texas, for a total amount of $214,522.96, to be used by Solid Waste Operations, effective upon issuance of letter of acceptance with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $7,150.76 available through the General Fund. SUMMARY: This motion will authorize the lease-purchase of one roll-off truck to be used by Solid Waste Operations through the BuyBoard Cooperative. This equipment will be used to haul sludge containers from wastewater plants to the Cefe Valenzuela landfill. This roll- off truck is a replacement unit. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Solid Waste currently has an operational requirement for the lease-purchase of one roll- off truck. This unit will be utilized to haul sludge containers from wastewater plants to the Cefe Valenzuela landfill. The roll-off truck in current operation has exceeded its expected service of 10 years or 10,000 hours. It is a 2012 Peterbilt with 12,343 hours. This procurement is through the BuyBoard Cooperative. Contracts awarded through the BuyBoard Cooperative have been competitively procured in compliance with Texas Local and State procurement requirements. The percentage of savings on the BuyBoard Cooperative is 32% less than MSRP. In view of these savings through the BuyBoard Cooperative, it is the recommended method of purchase for the City. Lease-Purchase of One Roll-Off Truck for Solid Waste AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 ALTERNATIVES: An alternative is to continue using the older roll-off truck which will require frequent maintenance causing downtime when being repaired. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impart for Solid Waste Operations in FY 2021 is $7,150.76. The remaining cost of $207,372.20 will be budget during the annual budgeting process. Financing for the lease-purchase of the Roll Off Truck is based on a sixty-month term with an estimated interest rate of 2.00% for an annual estimated payment of $42,904.56. The total estimated cost over the five-year period, including principal of $203,984.00 and interest of $10,538.96 is $214,522.96. Total Lease-Purchase Price: $203,984.00 Total estimated allowable interest for Lease: $ 10,538.96 Grand Total: $214,522.96 FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 1020 General Fund Organization/Activity: 12513 Sludge Hauling Mission Element: 033 Landfills Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 530190 Lease-Purchase RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing the lease -purchase of one Roll Off Truck for Solid Waste Operations with Lonestar Freightliner Group, LLC, as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet City of Corpus Christi Contracts & Procurement Buyer: Tracy Garza ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT EXTENDED TOTAL 1 2021 Western Star 4700SF Roll Off 1 $203,984.00 $203,984.00 $203,984.00 TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE Price Sheet Lease Purchase of One Roll-Off Truck Solid Waste Operations BuyBaord Quote Contract No. 601-19 LONESTAR FREIGHTLINER GROUP, LLC WACO, TX Freightliner Roll-Off Truck DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: David S. Lehfeldt, Director of Solid Waste Services DavidL3@cctexas.com (361) 826-1966 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the lease-purchase of one John Deere 644P wheel loader from Doggett Heavy Machinery Services, LLC, of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total amount of $316,507.18 to be used by Solid Waste Services, effective upon issuance of letter of acceptance with FY 2021 funding in the amount of $10,550.24 available through the General Fund. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes the lease-purchase of one John Deere 644P wheel loader through the Sourcewell Cooperative. This wheel loader will be used by Solid Waste to load compost into dump trucks, load brush into the grinder, move mulch and screen compost at the City’s planned composting facility. This will be an addition to existing fleet. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Solid Waste currently has a requirement for the lease-purchase of one John Deere 644P wheel loader, which will be utilized to load compost and materials into dump trucks, and for other operations at the City’s composting facility. This procurement is through the Sourcewell Cooperative. Contracts awarded through the Sourcewell Cooperative have been competitively procured in compliance with Texas Local and State procurement requirements. The percentage of savings on the Sourcewell Cooperative quote is 37% less than list price. In view of these savings through the Sourcewell Cooperative, it is the recommended method of purchase for the City. Lease-Purchase of One John Deere 644P Wheel Loader for Solid Waste Services AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives would be to rent this equipment for a higher cost, borrow one from other city operations without assured availability, or not operate a compost facility. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for FY 2021 is estimated at $10,550.24 available through the General Fund. Financing for the lease-purchase of the John Deere 644P wheel loader is based on a sixty-month term with an estimated interest rate of 2.00% for an annual estimated payment of $63,301.44. The total estimated cost over the five-year period, including principal of $300,958.00 and interest of $15,549.18, is $316,507.18. Total Lease-Purchase Price: $300,958.00 Total estimated interest for Lease: $ 15,549.18 Grand Total: $316,507.18 FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 1020 General Fund Organization/Activity: 12504 JC Elliot Transfer Station Mission Element: 033 Landfills Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 530190 Lease-Purchase RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing the lease -purchase of one John Deere 644P wheel loader for Solid Waste Services from Doggett Heavy Machinery Services, LLC, as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet City of Corpus Christi Contracts & Procurement Buyer: Tracy Garza ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT EXTENDED TOTAL 1 2021 John Deere 644P Wheel Loader 1 $300,958.00 $300,958.00 $300,958.00TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE Price Sheet Lease Purchase of One John Deere 644P Wheel Loader Solid Waste Operations Sourcewell Quote Contract No. 032119-JDC DOGGETT |JOHN DEERE CORPUS CHRISTI, TX John Deere 644 Wheel Loader DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Bill Mahaffey, Director of Gas Operations BillM@cctexas.com (361) 826-6927 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Resolution authorizing a three-year supply agreement in an amount not to exceed $612,537.94 with TDW (US), Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the purchase of Stopple equipment parts for Gas Operations, effective upon issuance of notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding in the amount not to exceed $119,105.00 available in the Gas Fund. SUMMARY: This resolution authorizes a three-year supply agreement for the purchase of Stopple equipment parts for Gas Operations. This agreement is necessary to repair pipeline and isolate a section of a gas line in the absence of a pressure control fitting. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: TDW provides hot tapping services and equipment that enable pipeline owners and operators to safely, efficiently, and cost effectively perform pipeline modification and repair activities without shutdown and with minimal disruption to product flow. Stopple fittings can be used as an alternative to conventional stopple fittings in a variety of hot tapping and plugging operations. The fittings are a crucial part of pipeline integrity, enabling operators to isolate an in-services pipeline for repair, replacement, maintenance, or other work. The plugging system is designed for isolating metal pipelines and polyethylene lines. They are designed for use with TDW plugging machines. TDW shortstop provides a sound alternative to squeezing a PE line when you want to branch, Purchase of Stopple Equipment Parts for Gas Operations AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 reroute, or relocate a system. TDW quality minimizes waste, enhances value, protects Health, Safety, and the environment. Their products deliver the highest quality products and services. The City of Corpus Christi Gas Department ha ve exclusively utilized TDW to keep in uniform with existing equipment, tools, and training. Any other brand stopple equipment will or may not be true to size and very costly to the department since all equipment and fittings are TDW. This is a sole source procurement. TDW is the sole distributor for Stopple fittings and are warrantied and serviced at their facility. ALTERNATIVES: An alternative is to not enter into a supply agreement, which would require separate procurements on an as needed basis. This would reduce the economies of scale pricing secured through a long-term contract and increase the time delay due to the procurement process, resulting in a longer lead time for needed services. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for the Gas Operations in FY 2021 is an amount not to exceed $119,105.00. The remaining cost of $493,433.00 will be budgeted in future years through the annual budget process. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 4130 Gas Fund Organization/Activity: 34130 Gas Construction Mission Element: 022 Gas Distribution System Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 520160 Pipe, fittings, drng Amount: $108,386.00 Fund: 4130 Gas Fund Organization/Activity: 34110 Gas Maintenance and Operations Mission Element: 022 Gas Distribution System Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 520160 Pipe, fittings, drng Amount: $10,719.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this resolution authorizing a three-year supply agreement with TDW (US) Inc., for Stopple equipment parts for the Gas Operations as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet Supply Agreement Resolution City of Corpus Christi Contracts and Procurement Department Senior Buyer: Cynthia Perez Total Qty of Parts: Total Parts Cost:Total Parts YR 1 Qty Yr. 2 Qty Yr. 3 Qty Total Parts:YR 1 Cost Yr. 2 Cost Yr. 3 Cost Total Cost for Parts: Gas Construction 502 $597,491.32 320 111 106 103 320 $149,675.66 $196,756.66 $208,881.00 $555,313.32 Maintenance of Operations 182 64 60 58 182 $17,956.00 $12,856.00 $11,366.00 $42,178.00 Total of Qty Yr. 1 Total of Qty Yr. 2 Total of Qty Yr. 3 Total Qty of Parts: Total Cost YR 1 Total Cost Yr. 2 Total Cost Yr. 3.Total Cost for Parts: 175 166 161 502 $167,631.66 $209,612.66 $220,247.00 $597,491.32 Freight $9,540.42 Total Cost on Parts:$607,031.74 Mark Up 2.5% for Year 3 Mark Up- YR 3 $5,506.20 Grand Total $612,537.94 Stopple Parts for TDW Equipment Price Sheet Page 1 of 2 Resolution authorizing a three-year supply agreement in an amount not to exceed $612,537.94 with TDW (US), Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the purchase of Stopple equipment parts for Gas Operations, effective upon issuance of notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding in the amount not to exceed $119,105.00 available in the Gas Fund. WHEREAS, these supplies will be used by Gas Operations; WHEREAS, TDW (US), Inc., will provide stopple equipment parts for Gas Operations, which are critical in sustaining the Departments operational reliability for service; WHEREAS, State law provides that such procurements, as outlined above, are subject to statutory procurement requirements, including competitive bids, unless an exception applies; WHEREAS, there is a statutory exception for this procurement in Local Government Code, Section 252.022(a) (2), as this purchase is necessary to preserve or protect the public health and safety of the City’s residents; WHEREAS, there is also a statutory exception for this procurement in Local Government Code, Section 252.022(a) (7) (A), as this purchase is available from only one source due to special processes or patents; and WHEREAS, there is also a statutory exception for this procurement in Local Government Code, Section 252.022(a) (7) (D), as this purchase consists of captive replacement parts or components for equipment. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: Section 1. The City Council specifically finds that the foregoing statements included in the preamble of this resolution are true and correct and adopts such findings for all intents and purposes related to the authorization of this procurement. Section 2. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute all documents necessary to secure a purchase from TDW (US), Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma based on a sole source for a total amount not-to-exceed $ 612,538.00. Page 2 of 2 PASSED AND APPROVED on the ______ day of _________, 202 1: Paulette M. Guajardo _______________________ Roland Barrera _______________________ Gil Hernandez _______________________ Michael Hunter _______________________ Billy Lerma _______________________ John Martinez _______________________ Ben Molina _______________________ Mike Pusley _______________________ Greg Smith _______________________ ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 1 of 8 SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 3364 Stopple Equipment Parts THIS Stopple Equipment Parts Supply Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”) and TDW (US), Inc. (“Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee (“City Manager”). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Stopple Equipment Parts in response to Request for Bid No. SS-3364 (“RFB”), which RFB includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB and the Contractor’s bid response are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Stopple Equipment Parts in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. “Goods,” “products,” and “supplies,” as used in this Agreement, refer to and have the same meaning. 2. Term. This Agreement is for three years. The parties may mutually extend the term of this Agreement for up to zero additional zero-year periods (“Option Period(s)”), provided, the parties do so by written amendment prior to the expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The City’s extension authorization must be executed by the City Manager or designee. 3.Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $612,537.94, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. Contractor shall invoice no more frequently than once per month. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Any amount not expended during the initial term or any option period may, at the City’s discretion, be allocated for use in the next option period. Invoices will be mailed to the following address with a copy provided to the Contract Administrator: DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 2 of 8 City of Corpus Christi Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 4.Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City’s Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Name: Maria Morales Department: Gas Operations Phone: (361) 885-6945 Email: MariaM@cctexas.com 5. Insurance. Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance (“COI”), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City’s Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days’ advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. To the extent of risks and liabilities expressly assumed by Contractor in this Agreement, the City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of products to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and products will remain with the Contractor until such time as the products are delivered and accepted by the City. 7.Inspection and Acceptance. City may inspect all products supplied before acceptance, but such inspection and/or acceptance shall occur no later than thirty (30) days after delivery after which all products supplied will be deemed accepted. Any products that are delivered but not accepted by the City must be corrected or replaced within the cure period as set forth in Section 19(A) of this Agreement at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or replacement at no charge within this period cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement product may be bought by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 3 of 8 including additional costs over the item’s bid price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City’s invoice. 8. Delivery. Contractor shall deliver the Goods - F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid and Added (charged back to the City on invoice), and risk of loss of Goods shall pass to the City when Goods are placed at the City’s disposal for unloading at the destination address. Title to Goods shall pass to the City upon receipt by Contractor of full payment for the Goods. 9. Warranty. (A) The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects in material and workmanship, fit for their normal purpose. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. (B) Contractor’s warranties hereunder exclude remedy for damage or defect caused by abuse, casualty, negligence, modifications or repair not performed by Contractor, improper or insufficient maintenance, improper storage, improper operation, including contrary to Contractor’s instructions or warnings, or normal wear and tear. In respect of Goods provided but not manufactured and/or not designed by Contractor, Contractor’s liability shall be limited to passing through to the City the benefit of any warranty provided by the vendor(s) of such products. Contractor shall cooperate with the efforts of the City to enforce such warranties with any such vendors, and Contractor shall assign, without cost to the City, all such warranties from vendors. (C) The products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the warranty period and subject to warranty disclaimers stated therein. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 10. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City’s actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City’s product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 11. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City’s City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 4 of 8 represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 12. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such products in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City). 13. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator unless the subcontractors were named in the bid or in an attachment to this Agreement. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 14. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties. 15. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 16. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other applicable taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. The City must provide Contractor on annual basis with valid tax certificate(s) to enable Contractor to be exempt from paying any sales and/or use taxes on any Goods, otherwise the Contractor shall be entitled to invoice the City and City shall be obligated to compensate Contractor the amount of such taxes. 17. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 5 of 8 IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Maria Morales Title: Construction System Support Work Coordinator Address: 4225 S. Port, Corpus Christi, Texas 78415 Phone: (361) 826-6945 Fax: (361) 853-3200 IF TO CONTRACTOR: TDW (US), Inc. Attn: John Hove General Counsel 6120 S. Yale Avenue #1700, Tulsa, OK 74136 918-447-5298 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (“INDEMNITEES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS, OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL REASONABLE EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, REASONABLE COURT COSTS, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES (“LOSSES”), WHICH ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY CONTRACTOR OR RESULTS FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL SUCH CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING OR RESULTING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. WHEN ANY OF THE LOSSES ARE THE RESULT OF JOINT OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OF ANY MEMBER OF INDEMNITEES OR CONTRACTOR, THE INDEMNITOR’S DUTY OF INDEMNIFICATION SHALL BE IN PROPORTION TO ITS ALLOCABLE SHARE OF NEGLIGENCE. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 6 of 8 19. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor’s failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period (which reasonable period shall be at least ten (10) business days from the date of receipt of written notice of breach), the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement, subject to Contractor having been first given a reasonable opportunity to cure as per section 19(A) of this Agreement. (C) Notwithstanding the foregoing, The City may not terminate this Agreement in respect of any delivered Goods or any engineered-to-order Goods (whether delivered or not), and Contractor shall be compensated for any costs incurred up to the time of termination. 20.Owner’s Manual and Preventative Maintenance. Contractor agrees to provide a copy of the owner’s manual and/or preventative maintenance guidelines or instructions if available for any equipment purchased by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor must provide such documentation upon delivery of such equipment and prior to receipt of the final payment by the City. 21. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 22. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 23.Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 7 of 8 A. this Agreement (excluding attachments and exhibits); B. its attachments; C. the bid solicitation document including any addenda (Exhibit 1); then, D. the Contractor’s bid response (Exhibit 2). 24.Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 “Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this Agreement if required by said statute. 25.Governing Law. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, Texas, and City laws in the performance of this Agreement. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 26.Public Information Act Requirements. This paragraph applies only to agreements that have a stated expenditure of at least $1,000,000 or that result in the expenditure of at least $1,000,000 by the City. The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Government Code, may apply to this contract and the Contractor agrees that the contract can be terminated if the Contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. 27.Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. 28.Limitation on Liability. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY RELATED DOCUMENT TO THE CONTRARY, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE CITY OR CONTRACTOR (OR ANY AFFILIATED ENTITY OF EITHER OF THEM) BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER OR TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR ANY SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PRODUCT OR PRODUCTION, LOSS OF USE, OR DAMAGE TO BUSINESS REPUTATION, HOWEVER CAUSED OR ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY AND WHETHER OR NOT A PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY RELATED DOCUMENT TO THE CONTRARY, IN ADDITION TO THE FOREGOING LIMIT, A PARTY’S MAXIMUM AGGREGATE LIABILITY TO THE OTHER PARTY (INCLUDING CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY TO “INDEMNITEES”) BASED ON ANY ACTIONS OR INACTION OF A PARTY RELATED TO, OR ARISING FROM, THIS AGREEMENT AND/OR THE GOODS, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE NATURE OF THE DAMAGES, NUMBER OF CLAIMANTS, THE NUMBER OF BREACHES, THEORIES OF LIABILITY (WHETHER BASED UPON A THEORY OF NEGLIGENCE, PRODUCTS LIABILITY, INDEMNITY, STRICT LIABILITY, DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Supply Agreement Standard Form Page 8 of 8 STATUTORY DUTY, BREACH OF WARRANTY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR TORT), OR THE NUMBER OF CAUSES OF ACTION (“CLAIMS”), SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL COMPENSATION DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR UNDER THE PURCHASE RELEASE ORDER GIVING RISE TO THE STATED CLAIM(S), PER PURCHASE RELEASE ORDER, INCLUSIVE OF ANY PAYMENTS TO THE CITY BY CONTRACTOR’S INSURANCE CARRIERS. THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH HEREIN SHALL APPLY EVEN IF SUCH LIMITATION RESULTS IN ANY REMEDY SPECIFIED IN THIS AGREEMENT TO FAIL OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE TERMINATION, CANCELLATION OR EXPIRATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI _________________________________________________ Josh Chronley Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement Date: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: _________________________________________________ Assistant City Attorney Date Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB No. 3364 Exhibit 2: Contractor’s Bid Response DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Kevin McNaughton 3/1/2021 Manager, Regional Sales - South US Attachment A - Scope of Work 1.1 General Requirements A. The Contractor shall supply pipeline parts and equipment for the City of Corpus Christi - Gas Department to be used on TDW equipment. B. The parts/equipment will be ordered on an as needed basis. Attachment B – Pricing Schedule contains all the negotiated prices. C. The orders will be placed by telephone or email. The Contractor shall deliver goods no later than two weeks after receipt of a purchase order. If the product is out of stock, the Contractor shall provide an estimated lead time with justification. D. The Contractor shall ship items to: City of Corpus Christi Gas Department 4225 South Port Ave. Corpus Christi, TX 78415 E. The Contractor shall guarantee the equipment/materials with the maximum standard warranty provided. If any items found, defective, unusable, or inoperable the Contractor shall arrange for return shipment at no cost to the City. F. No restocking fee or payment of any kind shall be owed, or orders cancelled due to Contractor’s inability to meet the deadline delivery date. G. All contract prices are F.O.B. destination, inside delivery to the City of Corpus Christi Gas Department Facility. 1.2 Invoicing The Supplier shall mail the original invoice to the address below and email a copy to MariaM@cctexas.com along with Contact name, Org, and Division. City of Corpus Christi Accounts Payable PO Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B City of Corpus Christi Contracts and Procurement Department Senior Buyer: Cynthia Perez Total Qty of Parts: Total Parts Cost:Total Parts YR 1 Qty Yr. 2 Qty Yr. 3 Qty Total Parts:YR 1 Cost Yr. 2 Cost Yr. 3 Cost Total Cost for Parts: Gas Construction 502 $597,491.32 320 111 106 103 320 $149,675.66 $196,756.66 $208,881.00 $555,313.32 Maintenance of Operations 182 64 60 58 182 $17,956.00 $12,856.00 $11,366.00 $42,178.00 Total of Qty Yr. 1 Total of Qty Yr. 2 Total of Qty Yr. 3 Total Qty of Parts: Total Cost YR 1 Total Cost Yr. 2 Total Cost Yr. 3.Total Cost for Parts: 175 166 161 502 $167,631.66 $209,612.66 $220,247.00 $597,491.32 Freight $9,540.42 Total Cost on Parts:$607,031.74 Mark Up 2.5% for Year 3 Mark Up- YR 3 $5,506.20 Grand Total $612,537.94 Stopple Parts for TDW Equipment Price Sheet DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Item Qty Stock No / Bill Code Description Unit Price Total Price CONSTRUCTI ON Total Parts Base Weight YR 1 Qty YR 2 Qty YR 3 Qty Total Qty Parts Qty Cost Yr 1 Qty Cost Yr 2 Qty Cost Yr 3 Construction Total Cost for Parts: Estimated Weight YR 1 Estimated Weight YR 2 Estimated Weight YR 3 1 150 08‐0114‐0002‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING CUP, 2in $30.00 $4,500.00 50 0.75 17 17 16 50 $510.00 $510.00 $480.00 $1,500.00 12.75 12.75 12 2 20 08‐0114‐0004‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING CUP, 4in $73.00 $1,460.00 20 0.75 7 7 6 20 $511.00 $511.00 $438.00 $1,460.00 5.25 5.25 4.5 10 10 08‐0114‐0006‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING CUP, 6in $138.00 $1,380.00 10 1 4 3 3 10 $552.00 $414.00 $414.00 $1,380.00 4 3 3 4 10 08‐3428‐0004‐01 SEALING CUP, 4in $319.00 $3,190.00 10 0.75 4 3 3 10 $1,276.00 $957.00 $957.00 $3,190.00 3 2.25 2.25 5 10 08‐2332‐0006‐01 SHORTSTOPP® II SEALING ELEMENT, 4 X 6in $330.00 $3,300.00 10 1.5 4 3 3 10 $1,320.00 $990.00 $990.00 $3,300.00 6 4.5 4.5 6 10 08‐2332‐0006‐02 SHORTSTOPP® II SEALING ELEMENT, 4 X 6in $330.00 $3,300.00 10 1.5 4 3 3 10 $1,320.00 $990.00 $990.00 $3,300.00 6 4.5 4.5 7 10 08‐2332‐0006‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 4X6in PAIR 2 $330.00 $3,300.00 10 1.5 4 3 3 10 $1,320.00 $990.00 $990.00 $3,300.00 6 4.5 4.5 8 10 08‐2332‐0008‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6in X 8in $423.00 $4,230.00 10 2.5 4 3 3 10 $1,692.00 $1,269.00 $1,269.00 $4,230.00 10 7.5 7.5 9 10 08‐2332‐0008‐01 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6 X 8in $423.00 $4,230.00 10 2.5 4 3 3 10 $1,692.00 $1,269.00 $1,269.00 $4,230.00 10 7.5 7.5 10 10 08‐2332‐0008‐02 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6in X 8in PAIR $423.00 $4,230.00 10 2.5 4 3 3 10 $1,692.00 $1,269.00 $1,269.00 $4,230.00 10 7.5 7.5 11 6 08‐2332‐0010‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 8 X 10in $668.00 $4,008.00 6 4 2 2 2 6 $1,336.00 $1,336.00 $1,336.00 $4,008.00 8 8 8 12 6 08‐2332‐0010‐01 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 8in X 10in $668.00 $4,008.00 6 4 2 2 2 6 $1,336.00 $1,336.00 $1,336.00 $4,008.00 8 8 8 13 6 08‐2332‐0010‐02 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 8in X 10in $668.00 $4,008.00 6 4 2 2 2 6 $1,336.00 $1,336.00 $1,336.00 $4,008.00 8 8 8 14 6 08‐2332‐0008‐03 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6in X 8in PAIR $502.00 $3,012.00 6 2.5 2 2 2 6 $1,004.00 $1,004.00 $1,004.00 $3,012.00 5 5 5 15 20 00‐0025‐0036‐00 WHEEL TYPE BRUSH, 2in OD 28‐30GA TWIST CRI $26.00 $520.00 10 1.5 4 3 3 10 $104.00 $78.00 $78.00 $260.00 6 4.5 4.5 16 10 00‐1289‐0001‐00 SHORTSTOPP® WHEEL‐TYPE BRUSH, 4in $27.00 $270.00 10 1.5 2 2 6 10 $54.00 $54.00 $162.00 $270.00 3 3 9 17 6 00‐1289‐0002‐00 P/N 01675‐ 6"$102.00 $612.00 6 2.5 2 2 2 6 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $612.00 5 5 5 18 50 05‐0179‐0002‐00 2" hole saw $71.00 $3,550.00 25 1 8 8 9 25 $568.00 $568.00 $639.00 $1,775.00 8 8 9 19 16 05‐0179‐0004‐00 SHORTSTOPP® and STOPPLE® TAP HOLE SAW, 4i $246.00 $3,936.00 10 2 3 3 4 10 $738.00 $738.00 $984.00 $2,460.00 6 6 8 20 10 05‐2348‐0006‐00 CUTTER, 6in SHORTSTOPP® 5.875in OD $1,392.00 $13,920.00 10 2 3 3 4 10 $4,176.00 $4,176.00 $5,568.00 $13,920.00 6 6 8 21 2 06‐5724‐0001‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ADAPTER, 4in TYPE II $841.00 $1,682.00 2 12 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $841.00 $841.00 $1,682.00 0 12 12 22 2 06‐5724‐0007‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ADAPTER, 6in X 4in TYPE II $1,719.00 $3,438.00 2 21 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $1,719.00 $1,719.00 $3,438.00 0 21 21 23 2 06‐5724‐0002‐00 ADAPTER, 6in TYPE II SHORTCUTT®$1,551.00 $3,102.00 2 15 1 1 0 2 $1,551.00 $1,551.00 $0.00 $3,102.00 15 15 0 24 2 06‐5724‐0004‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ADAPTER, 6in X 8in TYPE II $1,885.00 $3,770.00 2 33 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $1,885.00 $1,885.00 $3,770.00 0 33 33 25 2 06‐5724‐0003‐00 ADAPTER, 8in TYPE II SHORTCUTT®$1,793.00 $3,586.00 2 27 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $1,793.00 $1,793.00 $3,586.00 0 27 27 26 2 08‐3500‐0400‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 4in $9,078.00 $18,156.00 2 75 1 1 0 2 $9,078.00 $9,078.00 $0.00 $18,156.00 75 75 0 27 2 08‐3500‐0600‐00 PLUGGING MACHINE, 6in JACK $18,300.00 $36,600.00 2 120 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $18,300.00 $18,300.00 $36,600.00 0 120 120 28 2 08‐3501‐0406‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 4in X 6in $20,120.00 $40,240.00 2 110 1 1 0 2 $20,120.00 $20,120.00 $0.00 $40,240.00 110 110 0 29 2 08‐3501‐0608‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 6in X 8in $24,702.00 $49,404.00 2 165 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $24,702.00 $24,702.00 $49,404.00 0 165 165 30 2 08‐3501‐0810‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 8in X 10i $31,199.00 $62,398.00 2 340 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $31,199.00 $31,199.00 $62,398.00 0 340 340 31 2 08‐3501‐0812‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 8in X 12i $33,908.00 $67,816.00 2 375 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $33,908.00 $33,908.00 $67,816.00 0 375 375 32 2 08‐3386‐0019‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR HANDLE $298.00 $596.00 2 4 1 1 0 2 $298.00 $298.00 $0.00 $596.00 4 4 0 33 2 08‐3388‐0019‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR HANDLE, 6X8in $760.00 $1,520.00 2 7 1 1 0 2 $760.00 $760.00 $0.00 $1,520.00 7 7 0 34 4 09‐0040‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ASSEMBLY, 4in $7,645.00 $30,580.00 4 85 1 1 2 4 $7,645.00 $7,645.00 $15,290.00 $30,580.00 85 85 170 35 2 09‐0696‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II VALVE, 4in‐150lb $12,502.00 $25,004.00 2 56 1 1 0 2 $12,502.00 $12,502.00 $0.00 $25,004.00 56 56 0 36 2 09‐0697‐0000‐00 VALVE ASSEMBLY, 6in 150lb $18,152.00 $36,304.00 2 85 1 0 1 2 $18,152.00 $0.00 $18,152.00 $36,304.00 85 0 85 37 2 09‐0042‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE, 8in $18,822.00 $37,644.00 2 265 1 0 1 2 $18,822.00 $0.00 $18,822.00 $37,644.00 265 0 265 38 2 08‐3364‐0023‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR JACK HANDLE AS $317.00 $634.00 2 1.5 1 1 0 2 $317.00 $317.00 $0.00 $634.00 1.5 1.5 0 39 2 08‐3366‐0023‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR JACK HANDLE AS $280.00 $560.00 2 1.5 1 1 0 2 $280.00 $280.00 $0.00 $560.00 1.5 1.5 0 40 9 09‐0635‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® REPAIR KIT, 2in $108.00 $972.00 6 4 2 2 2 6 $216.00 $216.00 $216.00 $648.00 8 8 8 41 2 05‐1028‐0000‐00 T‐101b TAPPING MACHINE $5,647.00 $11,294.00 2 40 1 0 1 2 $5,647.00 $0.00 $5,647.00 $11,294.00 40 0 40 42 5 09‐0758‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 VALVE ASSEMBLY, 2in $1,812.00 $9,060.00 2 15 1 1 2 $1,812.00 $1,812.00 $0.00 $3,624.00 15 15 0 43 4 09‐0759‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 VALVE ASSEMBLY, 3in $4,550.00 $18,200.00 4 29 1 1 2 4 $4,550.00 $4,550.00 $9,100.00 $18,200.00 29 29 58 44 8 09‐0758‐0006‐00 DISC, OPERATING 2in SHORTCUTT®$171.00 $1,368.00 3 2.5 1 1 1 3 $171.00 $171.00 $171.00 $513.00 2.5 2.5 2.5 45 3 09‐0758‐0003‐00 GASKET, 2in SHORTCUTT® 500 VALVE $41.00 $123.00 1.5 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 46 3 09‐0637‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® REPAIR KIT, 4in $249.00 $747.00 9 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 47 4 08‐3309‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP®‐II PLUGGING MACHINE, 2in $2,522.00 $10,088.00 19 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 48 5 08‐0367‐0001‐00 SHORTPLUG™ PLUG HOLDER BODY, 1.250in $843.00 $4,215.00 0.75 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 50 5 05‐0204‐0000‐00 HOLDER PILOT ASSEMBLY, 2in and 3in HOLESAW $547.00 $2,735.00 0.75 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 51 3 09‐0792‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 SEAL MAINTENANCE KIT, 2in $176.00 $528.00 12 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 52 8 08‐3309‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP®‐II PLUGGING MACHINE, 2in $2,522.00 $20,176.00 4 20 1 1 2 4 $2,522.00 $2,522.00 $5,044.00 $10,088.00 20 20 40 53 3 09‐0792‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 SEAL MAINTENANCE KIT, 2in $176.00 $528.00 12 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 54 1 07‐1034‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP® 500 PLUGGING MACHINE $20,353.00 $20,353.00 1 43 1 0 0 1 $20,353.00 $0.00 $0.00 $20,353.00 43 0 0 55 1 06‐7265‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP® 500 ADAPTER PLATE, T‐203 ADAP $1,929.00 $1,929.00 1 13 1 0 0 1 $1,929.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,929.00 13 0 0 56 2 00‐1737‐0015‐00 EYE BOLT, .625in‐11 X 6in LONG $31.00 $62.00 2 0.75 1 1 0 2 $31.00 $31.00 $0.00 $62.00 0.75 0.75 0 57 2 00‐0435‐0008‐00 FLAT WASHER, .656in ID X 1.312in OD X .121in T $0.52 $1.04 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 $0.52 $0.52 $0.00 $1.04 0.5 0.5 0 58 2 00‐0136‐0158‐00 COMPRESSION SPRING, .098in WIDE X .850in $172.00 $344.00 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 $172.00 $172.00 $0.00 $344.00 0.5 0.5 0 59 2 08‐3367‐0019‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II HOOK CLAMP $379.00 $758.00 2 1.5 0 1 1 2 $0.00 $379.00 $379.00 $758.00 0 1.5 1.5 60 2 00‐3641‐0006‐00 WING NUT, TYPE A HVY .625in‐11 $3.74 $7.48 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 $3.74 $3.74 $0.00 $7.48 0.5 0.5 0 61 2 00‐1179‐0015‐00 CLEVIS PIN, .625in OD X 1.50in LONG $2.40 $4.80 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 $2.40 $2.40 $0.00 $4.80 0.5 0.5 0 Total Parts Total Parts Cost: Total Parts YR 1 Qty Yr 2 Qty Yr 3 Qty Total Parts:YR 1 Cost Yr2 Cost Yr 3 Cost Construction Total Cost for Parts: YR 1 Weight Yr2 Weight Yr 3 Weight 502 $597,491.32 320 111 106 103 320 $149,675.66 $196,756.66 $208,881.00 $555,313.32 1014 1648 1893 Item Qty Stock No / Bill Code Description Unit Price Total Price M&O Total Parts Base Weight YR 1 Qty YR 2 Qty YR 3 Qty Total Qty Parts Qty Cost Yr 1 Qty Cost Yr 2 Qty Cost Yr 3 M&O Total Cost for Parts: Estimated Weight YR 1 Estimated Weight YR 2 Estimated Weight YR 3 1 150 08‐0114‐0002‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING CUP, 2in $30.00 $4,500.00 100 0.75 34 33 33 100 $1,020.00 $990.00 $990.00 $3,000.00 25.5 24.75 24.75 2 20 08‐0114‐0004‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING CUP, 4in $73.00 $1,460.00 0.75 10 10 08‐0114‐0006‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING CUP, 6in $138.00 $1,380.00 1 4 10 08‐3428‐0004‐01 SEALING CUP, 4in $319.00 $3,190.00 0.75 5 10 08‐2332‐0006‐01 SHORTSTOPP® II SEALING ELEMENT, 4 X 6in $330.00 $3,300.00 1.5 6 10 08‐2332‐0006‐02 SHORTSTOPP® II SEALING ELEMENT, 4 X 6in $330.00 $3,300.00 1.5 7 10 08‐2332‐0006‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 4X6in PAIR 2 $330.00 $3,300.00 1.5 8 10 08‐2332‐0008‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6in X 8in $423.00 $4,230.00 2.5 9 10 08‐2332‐0008‐01 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6 X 8in $423.00 $4,230.00 2.5 10 10 08‐2332‐0008‐02 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6in X 8in PAIR $423.00 $4,230.00 2.5 11 6 08‐2332‐0010‐00 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 8 X 10in $668.00 $4,008.00 4 12 6 08‐2332‐0010‐01 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 8in X 10in $668.00 $4,008.00 4 13 6 08‐2332‐0010‐02 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 8in X 10in $668.00 $4,008.00 4 14 6 08‐2332‐0008‐03 SHORTSTOPP® SEALING ELEMENT, 6in X 8in PAIR $502.00 $3,012.00 2.5 15 20 00‐0025‐0036‐00 WHEEL TYPE BRUSH, 2in OD 28‐30GA TWIST CRI $26.00 $520.00 10 1.5 4 3 3 10 $104.00 $78.00 $78.00 $260.00 6 4.5 4.5 16 10 00‐1289‐0001‐00 SHORTSTOPP® WHEEL‐TYPE BRUSH, 4in $27.00 $270.00 1.5 17 6 00‐1289‐0002‐00 P/N 01675‐ 6"$102.00 $612.00 2.5 18 50 05‐0179‐0002‐00 2" hole saw $71.00 $3,550.00 25 1 8 8 9 25 $568.00 $568.00 $639.00 $1,775.00 8 8 9 19 16 05‐0179‐0004‐00 SHORTSTOPP® and STOPPLE® TAP HOLE SAW, 4i $246.00 $3,936.00 6 2 2 2 2 6 $492.00 $492.00 $492.00 $1,476.00 4 4 4 20 10 05‐2348‐0006‐00 CUTTER, 6in SHORTSTOPP® 5.875in OD $1,392.00 $13,920.00 2 21 2 06‐5724‐0001‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ADAPTER, 4in TYPE II $841.00 $1,682.00 12 22 2 06‐5724‐0007‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ADAPTER, 6in X 4in TYPE II $1,719.00 $3,438.00 21 23 2 06‐5724‐0002‐00 ADAPTER, 6in TYPE II SHORTCUTT®$1,551.00 $3,102.00 15 24 2 06‐5724‐0004‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ADAPTER, 6in X 8in TYPE II $1,885.00 $3,770.00 33 25 2 06‐5724‐0003‐00 ADAPTER, 8in TYPE II SHORTCUTT®$1,793.00 $3,586.00 27 26 2 08‐3500‐0400‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 4in $9,078.00 $18,156.00 75 27 2 08‐3500‐0600‐00 PLUGGING MACHINE, 6in JACK $18,300.00 $36,600.00 120 28 2 08‐3501‐0406‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 4in X 6in $20,120.00 $40,240.00 110 29 2 08‐3501‐0608‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 6in X 8in $24,702.00 $49,404.00 165 30 2 08‐3501‐0810‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 8in X 10i $31,199.00 $62,398.00 340 31 2 08‐3501‐0812‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II PLUGGING MACHINE, 8in X 12i $33,908.00 $67,816.00 375 32 2 08‐3386‐0019‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR HANDLE $298.00 $596.00 4 33 2 08‐3388‐0019‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR HANDLE, 6X8in $760.00 $1,520.00 7 34 4 09‐0040‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE ASSEMBLY, 4in $7,645.00 $30,580.00 85 35 2 09‐0696‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II VALVE, 4in‐150lb $12,502.00 $25,004.00 56 36 2 09‐0697‐0000‐00 VALVE ASSEMBLY, 6in 150lb $18,152.00 $36,304.00 85 37 2 09‐0042‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® VALVE, 8in $18,822.00 $37,644.00 265 38 2 08‐3364‐0023‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR JACK HANDLE AS $317.00 $634.00 1.5 39 2 08‐3366‐0023‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II CONTROL BAR JACK HANDLE AS $280.00 $560.00 1.5 40 9 09‐0635‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® REPAIR KIT, 2in $108.00 $972.00 3 4 1 1 1 3 $108.00 $108.00 $108.00 $324.00 4 4 4 41 2 05‐1028‐0000‐00 T‐101b TAPPING MACHINE $5,647.00 $11,294.00 40 42 5 09‐0758‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 VALVE ASSEMBLY, 2in $1,812.00 $9,060.00 3 15 1 1 1 3 $1,812.00 $1,812.00 $1,812.00 $5,436.00 15 15 15 43 4 09‐0759‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 VALVE ASSEMBLY, 3in $4,550.00 $18,200.00 29 44 8 09‐0758‐0006‐00 DISC, OPERATING 2in SHORTCUTT®$171.00 $1,368.00 5 2.5 2 2 1 5 $342.00 $342.00 $171.00 $855.00 5 5 2.5 45 3 09‐0758‐0003‐00 GASKET, 2in SHORTCUTT® 500 VALVE $41.00 $123.00 3 1.5 1 1 1 3 $41.00 $41.00 $41.00 $123.00 1.5 1.5 1.5 46 3 09‐0637‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® REPAIR KIT, 4in $249.00 $747.00 3 9 1 1 1 3 $249.00 $249.00 $249.00 $747.00 9 9 9 47 4 08‐3309‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP®‐II PLUGGING MACHINE, 2in $2,522.00 $10,088.00 4 19 2 1 1 4 $5,044.00 $2,522.00 $2,522.00 $10,088.00 38 19 19 48 5 08‐0367‐0001‐00 SHORTPLUG™ PLUG HOLDER BODY, 1.250in $843.00 $4,215.00 5 0.75 2 2 1 5 $1,686.00 $1,686.00 $843.00 $4,215.00 1.5 1.5 0.75 50 5 05‐0204‐0000‐00 HOLDER PILOT ASSEMBLY, 2in and 3in HOLESAW $547.00 $2,735.00 5 0.75 2 2 1 5 $1,094.00 $1,094.00 $547.00 $2,735.00 1.5 1.5 0.75 51 3 09‐0792‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 SEAL MAINTENANCE KIT, 2in $176.00 $528.00 3 12 1 1 1 3 $176.00 $176.00 $176.00 $528.00 12 12 12 52 8 08‐3309‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP®‐II PLUGGING MACHINE, 2in $2,522.00 $20,176.00 4 20 2 1 1 4 $5,044.00 $2,522.00 $2,522.00 $10,088.00 40 20 20 53 3 09‐0792‐0000‐00 SHORTCUTT® 500 SEAL MAINTENANCE KIT, 2in $176.00 $528.00 3 12 1 1 1 3 $176.00 $176.00 $176.00 $528.00 12 12 12 54 1 07‐1034‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP® 500 PLUGGING MACHINE $20,353.00 $20,353.00 43 55 1 06‐7265‐0000‐00 SHORTSTOPP® 500 ADAPTER PLATE, T‐203 ADAP $1,929.00 $1,929.00 13 56 2 00‐1737‐0015‐00 EYE BOLT, .625in‐11 X 6in LONG $31.00 $62.00 0.75 57 2 00‐0435‐0008‐00 FLAT WASHER, .656in ID X 1.312in OD X .121in T $0.52 $1.04 0.5 58 2 00‐0136‐0158‐00 COMPRESSION SPRING, .098in WIDE X .850in $172.00 $344.00 0.5 59 2 08‐3367‐0019‐00 SHORTSTOPP® II HOOK CLAMP $379.00 $758.00 1.5 60 2 00‐3641‐0006‐00 WING NUT, TYPE A HVY .625in‐11 $3.74 $7.48 0.5 61 2 00‐1179‐0015‐00 CLEVIS PIN, .625in OD X 1.50in LONG $2.40 $4.80 0.5 Total Parts Cost: Total Parts YR 1 Qty Yr 2 Qty Yr 3 Qty Total Parts:YR 1 Cost Yr2 Cost Yr 3 Cost M&O Total Cost for Parts: YR 1 Weight Yr2 Weight Yr 3 Weight $597,491.32 182 64 60 58 182 $17,956.00 $12,856.00 $11,366.00 $42,178.00 183 142 139 Tulsa to Corpus Christi Shipment Weight Carrier / Mode Freight Rate 5 UPS Ground 15.25$ 10 UPS Ground 15.83$ 25 UPS Ground 27.36$ 50 UPS Ground 53.90$ 100 UPS Ground 105.62$ 150 LTL 231.94$ 500 LTL 372.59$ 1000 LTL 566.00$ 1500 LTL 849.00$ 2500 LTL 1,165.57$ 5000 LTL 1,727.77$ 5000+ Truckload ‐K+3,300.00$ The unit price, total price, or both, of any individual item(s) listed in Attachment B can be increased by Contractor after the expiration of two (2) years of the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall inform the City of which item(s) will be increased and by how much in writing upon a 30‐days notice. Upon receipt of the notice of change in pricing, the pricing shall be negotiated and determined on per purchase release order basis, unless and until the parties execute an amended Bid/Pricing Schedule. The increase in unit price, total price, or both, for any item(s) listed in this Bid/Pricing Schedule shall not exceed 2.5% from the then current price for the applicable item(s). DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Attachment C - Insurance Requirements I. CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor Agency to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor Agency has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City’s Risk Manager and Contract Administer one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability Including: 1.Commercial Broad Form 2.Premises – Operations 3.Products/ Completed Operations 4.Contractual Liability 5.Independent Contractors 6.Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1.Owned 2.Hired and Non-Owned 3.Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS’ COMPENSATION EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY Statutory $500,000 /$500,000 /$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers’ compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers’ compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers’ compensation obligations incurred by the Contractor will be promptly met. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: •List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; •Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; •Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and •Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non-renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non-renewal of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this agreement. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. 2020 Insurance Requirements Ins. Req. Exhibit 4-B Contracts for General Services – Services Performed Onsite 02/07/2020 Risk Management – Legal Dept. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Attachment D - Warranty Requirements (A) The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects in material and workmanship, fit for their normal purpose. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. (B) Contractor’s warranties hereunder exclude remedy for damage or defect caused by abuse, casualty, negligence, modifications or repair not performed by Contractor, improper or insufficient maintenance, improper storage, improper operation, including contrary to Contractor’s instructions or warnings, or normal wear and tear. In respect of Goods provided but not manufactured and/or not designed by Contractor, Contractor’s liability shall be limited to passing through to the City the benefit of any warranty provided by the vendor(s) of such products. Contractor shall cooperate with the efforts of the City to enforce such warranties with any such vendors, and Contractor shall assign, without cost to the City, all such warranties from vendors. (C) Contractor’s warranties hereunder shall be available for a limited period of twelve (12) months from delivery of the Goods. (D) EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES EXPRESSLY STATED IN THIS ATTACHMENT D TO THE AGGREMENT CONTRACTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. CONTRACTOR DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TO THE EXTENT APPLICABLE. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3F71652D-D198-4E43-806F-4A8079AFC00B Stopple Equipment and how it works. Stopple Equipment is used to isolate a section of gas line in the absence of a permanently installed shutoff valve. This is the step by step process. 1. Hot Tap process a. Hot Tap Fitting- A flanged saddle Tap is welded to the pipe while it is still has gas pressure. This is basically a Tap Tee and at this stage the pressurized pipe has not been penetrated or opened. b. A hot tap valve is bolted to the flange of the hot tap fitting. This is a temporary valve that is used to shut the gas off during the different stages of the process. c. The hot tap machine is bolted to the hot tap valve. The hot tap machine is a sealed housing that includes a cutter which is a hole saw used to cut an opening into the pressurized pipe. d. The hot Tap valve is opened and the cutter is lowered to the pipe and a hole is cut into the pressurized pipe. e. After the hole is cut the cutter is raised above the hot tap valve, and the hot tap valve is shut. 2. Stopple Process a. The hot tap machine is removed from the hot tap valve and replaced with a stopple machine. The Stopple machine includes one or two folding rubber plug “stopple plug” that is small enough to fit through the previously cut hole. b. The hot tap valve is opened and the stopple plug is lowered into the still pressurized pipe. c. Once in the pipe the stopple is positioned to one side of the inside of the pipe away from the hole and unfolds to expand to the inside diameter of the pipe until the flow of gas is stopped. This takes an incredible level of skill by our most experienced technicians because it is a difficult process that is not always exact. d. Depending on the nature of the work this process may be performed at multiple locations, and sometimes includes adding a bypass line between stopples so that the delivery of gas is not interrupted while the repair work is completed. Images of Pic Of Stopple Equipment DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Sarah Munoz, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation SarahM3@cctexas.com (361) 826-3042 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the purchase of four replacement Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters, and one replacement Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster to be used for the cleanup of parks and beaches from River City Marketing, Inc. (dba Corpus Christi Golf Cars) for a total amount of $78,542.85 with FY 2021 funding available through the Equipment Replacement Fund. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes the replacement purchase of four Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters and one Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster through the Omnia Partners Cooperative. These units will be utilized for the cleanup of beaches and beach rescue. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Parks and Recreation currently has a requirement for the purchase of four Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters and one Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster. These units would be used at the Parks’ Beach Operations. The new units will have all-aluminum frames and beds to withstand the harsh environment. The current units in operation consist of two 2018 Kubota RTV900s, and three 2017 Kubota RTV900s. However, these units have not met their expected service lives due to severe rust damage from the harsh saltwater environment. This procurement is through the Omnia Partners Cooperative. Contracts awarded through the Omnia Partners Cooperative has been competitively procured in compliance with Texas Local and State procurement requirements. The percentage of savings on the Omnia Partners Cooperative quote is 15% less than MSRP. In view of these savings, it Purchase of Club Car Carryall Trucksters AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 is the recommended method of purchase for the City. ALTERNATIVES: An alternative is to continue using the older model Kubota RTV900s which would require frequent maintenance. This issue would lead to extensive out-of-service time while the vehicles are being repaired. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for FY21 is a total amount of $78,542.85 for the purchase of four Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters, and one Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster to be funded through the Equipment Replacement Fund FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 5111 Equipment Replacement Fund Organization/Activity: 13835 Beach Cleaning (SHOT) Mission Element: 201 Manage Fleet Inventories Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 550020 Vehicles and Machinery RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing the purchase of four Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters, and one Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster from River City Marketing, Inc., dba Corpus Christi Golf Cars. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet City of Corpus Christi Contracts & Procurement Buyer: Tracy Garza ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT EXTENDED TOTAL 1 Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters 4 $15,049.00 $60,196.00 2 Club Car Carryall 1700 Trucksters 1 $18,346.85 $18,346.85 $78,542.85 TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE Price Sheet Purchase of Four Club Car Carryall 1500 Trucksters and One Club Car Carryall 1700 Truckster Parks and Recreation Omnia Partners Contract No. EV2671-01 CORPUS CHRISTI GOLF CARS CORPUS CHRISTI, TX DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Peter Collins, Chief Information Officer of Information Technology PeterC@cctexas.com (361) 826-3735 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing a five-year service agreement with Freeit Data Solutions, Inc., in an amount of $146,400.00 for uninterruptible power supplies maintenance services for the City’s Data Centers, effective upon issuance of a notice to proceed, with FY 2021 funding available through the Information Technology fund. SUMMARY: This motion authorizes a five-year agreement with Freeit Data Solutions, Inc. through the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) Purchasing Cooperative. The agreement will provide uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) maintenance services, professional services and upgrades to existing hardware for the City of Corpus Christi’s Data Centers which will be managed by Information Technology Department (IT). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The IT Department currently has an existing uninterruptible power supply (UPS) maintenance agreement with Power Quality Sales during normal business hours Monday- Friday 8:00AM to 5:00PM for three locations at a cost of approximately $37,218.00 for two years. This new agreement with Freeit covers five locations and includes professional services and upgrades for end of life batteries and other hardware with 24x7 maintenance and support for five-years at a cost of $146,400.00 Uninterruptible Power Supply Solution – Refresh and Replacement Maintenance Services AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 This solution protects critical city infrastructure from electrical spikes and provides short- term power when main power fails. The UPS solution is a critical system and requires 24- hour support, 7 days a week. The IT Department contacted Contracts and Procurement to issue a contract through the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) Purchasing Cooperative. Contracts awarded through the DIR Purchasing Cooperative have been competitively procured, in compliance with Texas local and state procurement requirements. The DIR purchase continues maintenance on existing UPS hardware, replaces end of life batteries and refreshes end of life UPS system hardware. ALTERNATIVES: The UPS solution is a critical system and requires 24-hour support, 7 days a week; therefore, there is no alternatives to this agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact in FY 2021 is an amount not to exceed $146,400.00. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: 5210 Info Tech Organization/Activity: 40420 IT Tech Infrastructure Service Mission Element: 241 Prvd Supt Technology Infrast. Project # (CIP Only): n/a Account: 520130 Maint. & Repairs RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing a five-year service agreement with Freeit Data Solutions, Inc., as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet Service Agreement City of Corpus Christi Price Sheet Sr. Buyer: Minerva Alvarado Uninterruptible Power Supplies DIR-TSO-4229 Item Description Quantity UOM Unit Price Total 1 Professional services to install, configure and upgrade uninterruptible power supplies 1 EA $146,400.00 $146,400.00 $146,400.00Total Freeit Data Solutions, Inc. Austin, TX Service Agreement Standard Form Page 1 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 98065 Uninterruptible Power Supplies - Refresh/Replacement Maintenance Services THIS Uninterruptible Power Supplies Refresh/Replacement Maintenance Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (“City”) and Freeit Data Solutions, Inc. (“Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee (“City Manager”). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Uninterruptible Power Supplies Refresh/Replacement Maintenance Services in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. DIR-TSO 4229 (“RFB/RFP”), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor’s bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Uninterruptible Power Supplies Refresh/Replacement Maintenance Services (“Services”) in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for five years, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or the Contracts and Procurement Department, or the performance date listed in the notice to proceed, whichever is later. The parties may mutually extend the term of this Agreement for up to zero additional zero-year periods (“Option Period(s)”), provided, the parties do so by written amendment prior to the expiration of the original term or the then-current Option Period. The City’s extension authorization must be executed by the City Manager or designee. 3. Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $146,400.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. Contractor shall invoice no more frequently than once per month. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. Any amount not expended during the initial term or any option period may, at the City’s discretion, be allocated for use in the next option period. DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 2 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 Invoices will be mailed to the following address with a copy provided to the Contract Administrator: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City’s Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Phillip Grant Information Technology Department 361-826-3845 phillipg2@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance (“COI”), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City’s Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days’ advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event that a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond’s terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple-release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 3 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. City may inspect all Services and products supplied before acceptance. Any Services or products that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re-worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re-working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item’s bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City’s invoice. 8. Warranty. (A) The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. (B) In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (C) Contractor warrants that all Services will be performed in accordance with the standard of care used by similarly situated contractors performing similar services. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City’s actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City’s product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non-Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City’s City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 4 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. In performing the Services, the Contractor will not enter into subcontracts or utilize the services of subcontractors. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other applicable taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand-delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Phillip Grant IT Infrastructure Manager 1201 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Phone: 361-826-3845 Fax: n/a IF TO CONTRACTOR: Freeit Data Solutions, Inc. Attn: Joe White Account Executive P.O. Box 1572, Austin, TX 78767 Phone: 800-478-5161 Fax: 888-416-0471 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (“INDEMNITEES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF WHATEVER NATURE, CHARACTER, OR DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT OF DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 5 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS, OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES, WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR OR RESULTS FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT, OMISSION, MISCONDUCT, OR FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING OR RESULTING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor’s failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Owner’s Manual and Preventative Maintenance. Contractor agrees to provide a copy of the owner’s manual and/or preventative maintenance guidelines or instructions if available for any equipment purchased by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor must provide such documentation upon delivery of such equipment and prior to receipt of the final payment by the City. 20. Limitation of Liability. The City’s maximum liability under this Agreement is limited to the total amount of compensation listed in Section 3 of this Agreement. In no event shall the City be liable for incidental, consequential or special damages. 21. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 6 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 22. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 23. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement (excluding attachments and exhibits); B. its attachments; C. the bid solicitation document including any addenda (Exhibit 1); then, D. the Contractor’s bid response (Exhibit 2). 24. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 “Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this Agreement if required by said statute. 25. Governing Law. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, Texas, and City laws in the performance of this Agreement. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 26. Public Information Act Requirements. This paragraph applies only to agreements that have a stated expenditure of at least $1,000,000 or that result in the expenditure of at least $1,000,000 by the City. The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Government Code, may apply to this contract and the Contractor agrees that the contract can be terminated if the Contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. 27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Service Agreement Standard Form Page 7 of 7 Approved as to Legal Form December 15, 2020 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ________________________________________________ Josh Chronley Interim Assistant Director, Contracts and Procurement Date: _________________________ Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance and Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. DIR-TSO 4229 Exhibit 2: Contractor’s Bid/Proposal Response DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 2/4/2021 Director of Operations Dulari von Christierson ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT NAME: Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) Refresh\Replacement and Maintenance Services PROJECT ADDRESS: 1.City of Corpus Christi IT Department, 1201 Leopard Street, IT Basement, Corpus Christi, TX 78401. 2.City of Corpus Christi IT Department, 321 John Sartain Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78401 3.City of Corpus Christi Stevens Plant, 13101 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78410 4.Corpus Christi Airport, 1000 International Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 78406 5.Corpus Christi Fleet Maintenance, 5352 Ayers Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78415 Scope of Work: A. The Contractor shall provide upgrades and extend/reinstate service contracts for existing hardware units for the provided serial numbers listed below and their project locations, which will also include the Advantage Ultra Service Plan. 1.Serial Numbers PD0635160106 (Police) and JK1341001647 (O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant) – Term Date 02/13/2026 2.Serial Number PD1405150017(O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant) – Term Date 02/13/2026 B.The Contractor shall include upgrades that allows yearly preventative maintenance visits (except where otherwise noted) to be scheduled 24x7, instead of only during business hours and features a 4-hour 24x7 response time for on-site remedial services. The service contract covers the below units for the service periods/terms listed below: 1.Serial Numbers PD0635160106 (Police) and JK1341001647 (O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant) – Term Date 02/13/2026 2.Serial Number PD1405150017(O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant) – Term Date 02/13/2026 C.The Contractor shall provide and extend/reinstate service contracts for existing hardware units for the provided serial number below and its project location, which will include the Advantage Ultra Service Plan for the following hardware to term 12/31/2021, since the device is going end of life. Page 1 of 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 1.Serial Number ED0414000043 (City Hall). D.The Contractor will include a Pre-Contract Audit required to re-certify units are in working condition. Additional repairs (with additional cost) may be required before units can be recertified for: 1.Serial Numbers AD1723320355, AD1749120010 (Corpus Christi International Airport) a.No preventative maintenance until the hardware is certified. b.After the units are certified; The Service Contract Reinstatement term will be for one year E.The Contractor shall include installs and replacements of the below hardware at the customer project locations. The hardware purchase will include UPS and battery units that feature five-year, 24/7 monitoring and dispatch service coverage with monitoring via embedded network management card within the UPS units. The hardware purchase and install/replacement will include the following: 1.Qty. 2 - 5.4kVA smart UPS units featuring 208V output voltage and embedded network card – Fleet Maintenance. 2.Qty. 4 - 192V 5kVA and 6kVA RM battery pack units – Fleet Maintenance. 3.Qty. 4 – SYBT4 battery modules (O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant) - Battery replacements. F.The Contractor will provide hardware support for purchased hardware listed above where it includes all power supplies, or any other items that are related to hardware in this replacement/install, including: 1.Support and replacement of any failed parts. 2. NBD (Next Business Day) replacement on hardware. 3.Hardware support via email, WebEx, and phone support with four-hour response time. Support 7 days a week, 24 hours. IT Point of Contact: Phillip Grant 1201 Leopard St. Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Office 361-826-3845, phillipg2@cctexas.com Page 2 of 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Contract No:DIR-TSO-4229 TAX ID#:27-2209002 Term:NET 30 FOB:Destination City of Corpus Christi Freeit Data Solutions, Inc. Sam Bhakta P.O. Box 1572 PO Box 9277, MIS 4th Floor Austin, TX 78767 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 Quote Number:7195888 PH: (800) 478-5161 / FAX: (888) 416-0471 Ph: (361) 826-2489 Quote Date:1/28/2021 samitb@cctexas.com Expiration Date:4/28/2021 Freeit Contact:Joe White (512) 553-8928 Joe@freeitdata.com Qty Part Number List Price Contract % Discount Unit Price Ext Price Services 1 FDS-UPSU-PS-7 $219,100.00 15.00%$146,400.00 $146,400.00 List Total: DIR Discounted Total: Shipping and Tax not applicable:$0.00 Additional Discount: Grand Total: Customer Signature of Acceptance PO# By issuance of a PO, I acknowledge that I have the authority on behalf of my company to make purchasing decisions to order the items in this quote and to begin project initiation. This quote is subject to and will be governed by the terms and conditions and RMA policy located at www.freeitdata.com/policies and will govern our relationship and any PO issued in relation to this quote. Any and all competing or conflicting terms and conditions are hereby unconditionally rejected. Description $186,235.00 $219,100.00 ($39,835.00) $146,400.00 Freeit Data Solutions - UPS Professional Services Professional Services to install, configure and upgrade uninterruptible power supplies - Refer to SOW FDS01202021 1 of 1 Attachment B: Bid/Pricing ScheduleDocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements A.CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE 1.Contractor must not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor Agency to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor Agency has been obtained. 2.Contractor must furnish to the City’s Risk Manager and Contract Administer one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE Commercial General Liability Including: 1.Commercial Broad Form 2.Premises – Operations 3.Products/ Completed Operations 4.Contractual Liability 5.Independent Contractors 6.Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1.Owned 2.Hired and Non-Owned 3.Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS’ COMPENSATION EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY Statutory $500,000 /$500,000 /$500,000 3.In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. B.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1.Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers’ compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on Page 1 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers’ compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers’ compensation obligations incurred by the Contractor will be promptly met. 2.Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. 3.Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 4. Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: •List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; •Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; •Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and •Provide 30 calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than 10 calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 5.Within 5 calendar days of a cancellation, non-renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Page 2 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 6.In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 7.Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 9.It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. 2020 Insurance Requirements Ins. Req. Exhibit 4-B Contracts for General Services – Services Performed Onsite 06/08/2020 Risk Management – Legal Dept. Page 3 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Warranty is not required for this agreement; therefore, Section 8 - Warranty, subsection 8 (A) and 8 (B) is null and void. Page 1 of 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: D472A33A-0851-4327-9396-54F70B757931 DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Kevin Smith KevinS4@cctexas.com (361) 289-0171 Josh Chronley, Interim Assistant Director of Contracts and Procurement JoshC2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 CAPTION: Motion authorizing a one-year service agreement for Digital Marketing Campaign for the Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) with Bell Media LLC of Montgomery, Alabama for a total amount of $89,880.00, with FY 2021 funding available through the Airport Fund. SUMMARY: Motion authorizing a one-year service agreement with Bell Media LLC to provide a comprehensive Digital Marketing Campaign to entice travelers in the Coastal Bend to choose CCIA, therefore reducing leakage to other airports, increasing enplanements, and raising load factors at CCIA. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately 45% of air travelers in this region were choosing to drive to larger airports to get cheaper fares and non -stop flights. This “leakage” makes it more difficult to convince the commercial airlines to increase service at CCIA. CCIA has an opportunity to get in front of people who are planning to travel again soon by implementing a digital campaign that targets people as they search on line for flights and retargets those who do not respond immediately to the marketing messages. The goal is to convince the traveler to book their trip out of CCIA. Digital Marketing Campaign for CCIA AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 A similar 6-month campaign launched in June of 2020 yielded results that contributed to reducing leakage by as much as 14 percentage points some months. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, travelers are more inclined than ever to avoid big crowds and to opt for airports that offer convenience, plenty of space for social distancing, and a clean and comfortable experience. CONTRACTS AND PROCUREMENT: Contracts and Procurement conducted a competitive Request for Proposals process to obtain proposals from qualified firms to provide a Digital Marketing Campaign for CCIA. The evaluation committee included City staff from the Aviation Department and an Advisory Board member. The City received five proposals, two proposals being non - responsive, and evaluated them against the published criteria. Two proposals were deemed non-responsive for not using the correct pricing form as each developer must submit a pricing breakdown as part of their proposal. The final scores were tabulated for each firm to determine the highest-ranking firm offering the best value to the City. Staff is recommending award to Bell Media, LLC as the highest-ranking firm. ALTERNATIVES: CCIA’s marketing dollars can be spent on a variety of media. None allow the kind of market targeting that can be accomplished with search engine engagement. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The financial impact of the service agreement in FY 2021 is not to exceed the one-year contract amount of $89,880. Funding Detail: Fund: 4610 Organization/Activity: 35000 - Airport Mission Element: 274 Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: 530500 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion authorizing a one-year service agreement with Bell Media, LLC as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Evaluation Matrix Service Agreement DocuSign Envelope ID: 06EE0F69-2BEC-4108-BE1 B-B4373869BC6D Attachment A: Scope of Work 1.1 General Requirements Seeking a firm to design a turn-key marketing strategy and campaign designed to reduced originating leakage at Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) by 20% from the 2019 calendar year levels. In 2019, leakage to San Antonio and Houston airports was estimated at 45% of the originating traffic in the market. This campaign will launch in early 2021 as the airport and the airlines work to recover from the traffic downturns brought on by the rnrnnnvin 1, nnnrli=>mir --. --' ........'' --..... --- .............. -' ' .. -. 1.2 Scope of Work A.Contractor must be a Google Premier Partner firm. B.Contractor shall create digital ads and a landing page with marketing messages that are designed to reduce originating market leakage at CCIA. Leakage refers to local travelers who will drive to other larger, regional airports to get less expensive fares and non-stop flights. C.Contractor shall execute the campaign with constant monitoring and adjustments made for any underperforming ads or sudden or cumulative changes in the industry that dictate an altered approach with creative. D.Contractor shall manage the campaign and report results data and performance to airport staff. This data shall include but not limited to clicks, clicks through rates {CTR's), Conversions, number of relevant searches, and impressions. E.Contractor shall collaborate with an aviation/airport consultant during the design, creation, execution and management of this campaign and have that consultant on the management team for the duration of the campaign. F.Contractor shall have proven experience and demonstrated success working on leakage campaigns for airports. G.The technical and management aspects of the campaign will include: l. Google Search Engine Marketing (SEM) -target geographies (Nueces, San Patricio, Kleberg, Aransas, Jim Wells counties), target in-market consumers who are using established key words to search for airfare with emphasis on CCIA's top destinations as determined by the airport Page l of 2 Digital Marketing Campaign for CCIA RFP No. 3400 Sr. Buyer: Minerva Alvarado Proposal Evaluation Bell Media LLC BQR Advertising and Public Relations, Inc. Kiii-TV Sinclair Digital- Compulse Integrated Marketing Sky Synergy MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS (PASS/FAIL) Google Premier Partner Required five year in business No outstanding lawsuits during last 5 years or current litigation with the City during last 5 years No Outstanding regulatory issues last 5 years References Provided for firm TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (80 PTS)74 56 14 25 50 Creative Process for Building Campaign Team's Experience Understanding of Project Scope PRICING (20 PTS)20 14 13 nonresponsive nonresponsive Total 94 70 27 Nonresponsive=Used wrong Price Form Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass DATE: March 8, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Heather Hurlbert, Director of Finance and Business Analysis Heatherh3@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 CAPTION: Resolution relating to City of Corpus Christi’s intention to reimburse itself from future issuances of Certificates of Obligation in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for expenses budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2020 -2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and two additional needed projects that may begin before the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation. SUMMARY: The City of Corpus Christi is planning on awarding contracts for several General Fund capital projects included in the Fiscal Year 2020 -2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and two additional needed projects prior to the issuance of certificates of obligation planned in the spring. This resolution is needed for the City to move forward with incurring capital costs and then reimburse itself for these costs with proceeds from the certificates of obligation once they are issued. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City is planning on issuing Certificates of Obligation to fund ten projects in the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) along with two additional needed projects. The ten projects included in the Fiscal Year 2020 -2021 CIP include the following: City Hall First Floor Renovation $ 125,000 City Hall 6th Floor Conference Room $ 480,000 Various Facility Improvements $1,000,000 Museum of Science and History Cooling and Heating $1,342,440 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Sector 2C Cell Development $ 517,000 Cefe Valenzuela Gas Collection & Control System $ 315,000 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Road Improvements $2,000,000 JC Elliott Landfill Road Improvements $1,100,000 Solid Waste Facility Complex $2,516,500 Police Substation - Flour Bluff $1,200,000 Reimbursement Resolution for Certificates of Obligation Projects AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting March 16, 2021 The two additional projects being recommended for funding were identified subsequent to the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 CIP. They include: City Hall Elevators $1,250,000 Veteran's Pavilion $ 175,000 The three public elevators at City Hall are in need of a complete overhaul in order to pass inspection. The Veteran’s Pavilion project will provide shade structure at Sherrill Park located at 222 South Shoreline Boulevard. The City is able to award contracts for these projects prior to the issuance of the certificates of obligation in order to move forward with the projects early in the fiscal year. The City plans on issuing the certificates of obligation later in the fiscal year and will reimburse itself an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for expenditures with the proceeds from the certificates of obligation. For the City to be eligible for reimbursement of any expenditure incurred prior to the sale of the certificates of obligation, the City must declare its intent to reimburse itself for payments made prior to the certificates being sold. This action must meet specific U.S. Treasury Regulations and requires approval by the City Council. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative would be to reject the reimbursement resolution, but this would prevent contracts from being awarded and delay the start of the projects until the certificates of obligation have been issued. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item will authorize City staff to encumber and spend available cash to begin awarding contracts for projects prior to the bond issuance. Once the certificates of obligation are issued, the cash funds will be replenished with the proceeds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution 2020-2021 Certificate of Obligation CIP Projects 101542636.5 RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING THE CITY’S INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FOR THE PRIOR LAWFUL EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FROM THE PROCEEDS ONE OR MORE SERIES OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $12,000,000 FOR AUTHORIZED PURPOSES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTING VARIOUS CITY IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council (the Governing Body) of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the Issuer) has entered into or will enter into various contracts pertaining to the expenditure of lawfully available funds of the Issuer to finance the costs associated with (i) (a) constructing, acquiring, purchasing, renovating, enlarging, and improving City facilities and signage, including City Hall, the Museum of Science and History, and Cole Park Pier Plaza, (b) constructing, acquiring, purchasing, renovating, enlarging, and improving City facilities and signage, including a Police Substation, and (c) constructing, acquiring, purchasing, renovating, enlarging, and improving City solid waste facilities, including landfill site development, a gas collection and control system, and related road improvements (the Construction Costs), (ii) the payment of various engineering costs, including design testing, design engineering, and construction inspection related to the Construction Costs (the Engineering Costs), (iii) the payment of various architectural costs, including preparation of plans and specifications and various other plans and drawings related to the Construction Costs (the Architectural Costs), and (iv) the payment of various administrative costs, including the fees of bond counsel, financial advisor, project manager, project consultant, other professionals, and bond printer (the Administrative Costs) [the Construction Costs, the Engineering Costs, the Architectural Costs, and the Administrative Costs collectively constitute the costs of the projects that are the subject of this Resolution (the Project)]; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 1201.042, as amended, Texas Government Code provide that the proceeds from the sale of obligations issued to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping, or furnishing of any project or facilities, such as the Project, may be used to reimburse the Issuer for costs attributable to such project or facilities paid or incurred before the date of issuance of such obligations; and WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to reimburse itself for the prior lawful capital expenditure of funds from the proceeds of one or more series of tax-exempt obligations (the Obligations) that the Issuer currently contemplates issuing in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 to finance a portion of the costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, to fund such reimbursement with proceeds of the Obligations, the Issuer must declare its expectation ultimately to make such reimbursement before making the expenditures; and 101542636.5 - 2 - WHEREAS, the Issuer hereby finds and determines that the reimbursement for the prior expenditure of funds of the Issuer is not inconsistent with the Issuer’s budgetary and financial circumstances; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the citizens of the Issuer; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. This Resolution is a declaration of intent to establish the Issuer’s reasonable, official intent to reimburse itself from certain of the proceeds of the Obligations for any capital expenditures previously incurred or to be incurred with respect to the Project from the Issuer’s General Fund or other lawfully available funds of the Issuer. SECTION 2. The reimbursed expenditure will be a type properly chargeable to a capital account (or would be so chargeable with a proper election) under general federal income tax principles. SECTION 3. The Issuer intends to otherwise comply with those matters addressed within this Resolution. SECTION 4. This Resolution may be relied upon by the appropriate officials at the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas and establishes compliance by the Issuer with the requirements of Texas law. SECTION 5. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Governing Body. SECTION 6. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 8. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the Governing Body hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 9. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. 101542636.5 - 3 - SECTION 10. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. * * * * 101542636.5 S-1 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED on this the 16th day of March, 2021. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (CITY SEAL) APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF MARCH, 2021: _____________________________________ Miles Risley, City Attorney 101542636.5 S-2 THE STATE OF TEXAS )( COUNTY OF NUECES )( I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of a Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the 16th day of March, 2021, relating to establishing the City’s intention to reimburse itself in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for the prior lawful expenditure of funds relating to constructing various capital improvements to City property, which Resolution is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City, this the _______ day of March, 2021. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 101542636.5 S-3 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 16th day of March, 2021: Paulette M. Guajardo _______________________ Roland Barrera _______________________ Gil Hernandez _______________________ Michael Hunter _______________________ Billy Lerma _______________________ John Martinez _______________________ Ben Molina _______________________ Mike Pusley _______________________ Greg Smith _______________________ ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FY 2021 CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION PROJECTS NEEDING REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION Included in adopted FY20-21 Capital Budget Book: City Hall First Floor Renovation 125,000$ City Hall 6th Floor Conference Room 480,000$ Various Facility Improvements 1,000,000$ Museum of Science and History Cooling and Heating 1,342,440$ Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Sector 2C Cell Development 517,000$ Cefe Valenzuela Gas Collection & Control System 315,000$ Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Road Improvements 2,000,000$ JC Elliott Landfill Road Improvements 1,100,000$ Solid Waste Facility Complex 2,516,500$ Police Substation - Flour Bluff 1,200,000$ Additional needs for Certificates of Obligation: City Hall Elevators 1,250,000$ Veteran's Pavilion 175,000$ TOTAL FOR REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION 12,020,940$ March 8, 2021 DATE: January 22, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, Director Development Services alraymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3575 21092 CAPTION: Resolution authorizing a developer participation agreement with Southside Ventures III, LP to reimburse the developer up to $91,578.18 for the City’s share of the cost to construct Oso Parkway associated with a planned residential subdivision known as Cayo Del Oso Subdivision, Section 4. (District 5 SUMMARY: Southside Ventures III, LP is developing a new residential subdivision and is required to construct a new section of Oso Parkway. The developer has requested a developer participation agreement to extend Oso Parkway and allow the developer to continue with the planned residential subdivision’s development. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Developer, Southside Ventures III, LP, has requested reimbursement through a developer participation agreement to construct 1080 linear feet of Oso Parkway. The new parkway street is being constructed in conjunction with a residential subdivision named Cayo Del Oso Section 4. The developer is required to construct this section of Oso Parkway in accordance with the Urban Transportation Plan to meet the requirements of a Parkway street cross section. Oso Parkway is designated as a Parkway Collector Street with 80 feet street right-of-way and a thicker pavement section than a minor residential collector. The Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.4.1A allows the City to participate in street construction when the street cross section exceeds a minor residential collector. The estimated one-time cost for the portion of the new street is $91,578.18. Additionally, the portion of the street is eligible for reimbursement of the construction costs per Texas Local Government Code 212.072. Participation Agreement with Southside Ventures III, LP AGENDA MEMORANDUM Resolution for the City Council Meeting 3/16/2021 ALTERNATIVES: This project will extend Oso Parkway as part of the regional transportation network and will provide greater access to Cayo Del Oso Section 4. An alternative to utilizing Developer Participation funds from available Bond monies to construct the required street improvements would be to construct the new street under a City initiated CIP project. This option would most likely delay the new street construction until the required funding for the street improvements could be programmed into the CIP budget, and would most likely impact the developer’s ability to build out his planned residential subdivision in a timely manner. FISCAL IMPACT: The $91,578.18 in funding for this developer participation agreement come from funds that have been earmarked during a City Bond initiative to improve existing or construct new City streets and other related improvements. The total estimated project cost for the Parkway Collector Street is $305,260.60 and the difference between residential collector and parkway collector is $96,555.83 of which the maximum amount allowed by Texas Local government code 212.072 (30%) of which will be reimbursed to the developer up to $91,578.18 as stated above. The 2012 Bond has sufficient funds available to reimburse developers, through participation agreements, for the construction of this section of streets, other related improvements, and improvements to existing deteriorated streets in order to bring them up to current standards. This request is a one-time cost associated with the development of the project. Funding Detail: Fund: 3701 Developer Participation Bond 2012 Organization/Activity: 21092-3701-EXP Mission Element: 052 Expansion of street system Project # (CIP Only): 21092 Cayo Del Oso Subdivision. Please reference project 19001 in FY2020-2021 Capital Budget document. Account: 550910 RECOMMENDATION: The request in in accordance with UDC Section 8.4 City Participation in Streets and Drainage Crossings and Section 212.072 of the Texas Local Government Code. Oso Parkway, and related improvements, will provide greater access to Cayo Del Oso Section 4 and is in compliance with the Urban Transpiration Plan. Staff recommends approval. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution (with exhibits) Presentation Location Map Resolution authorizing a developer participation agreement with Southside Ventures Ill, LP to reimburse the developer up to $91,578.18 for the City's share of the cost to construct Oso Parkway associated with a planned residential subdivision known as Cayo Del Oso Subdivision, Section 4 WHEREAS, the City has determined that the agreement will carry out the purpose of the Unified Development Code; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute a developer participation agreement ("Agreement") with Southside Ventures Ill, LP, ("Developer''), for the City's portion of the cost to construct Oso Parkway including all related appurtenances for development of Cayo Del Oso Subdivision, Section 4, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED on the ___ day of ________ , 2021: Paulette M. Guajardo Roland Barrera Gil Hernandez Michael Hunter Billy Lerma John Martinez Ben Molina Mike Pusley Greg Smith ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary City Secretary CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Paulette M. Guajardo Mayor Page 1 of 1 Southside Ventures, LP Page 1 of 1 Streets Participation Agreement PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT For Streets Per UDC §8.4 STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF NUECES § This PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi (“City”), a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, acting by and through its City Manager, or designee, and Southside Ventures III, LP, (“Developer”), a Texas Limited Partnership. WHEREAS, the Owner owns certain real property located in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, being 37.13 acers of land situated in portion of Lots 9, 10 and 11, Section 26, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts (the "Property"), and the Owner desires to develop and plat the Property designated on Exhibit 1 of this Agreement, which exhibit is attached to and incorporated in this Agreement by reference, to be known as Cayo Del Oso Subdivision Section 4 (“Plat”); WHEREAS, as a condition of the Plat, the Developer/Owner is required to expand, extend, and construct Oso Parkway approximately 1080 lineal feet of roadway and associated construction improvements as depicted on and in accordance with the improvement requirements (the “Roadway Extension”) set forth in Exhibit 2, which exhibit is attached to and incorporated in this Agreement by reference; WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to have the public street infrastructure installed by the Developer in conjunction with the Owner's final Plat; WHEREAS, Section 212.071 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes a municipality to make a contract with a developer of a subdivision or land in the municipality to construct public improvements related to the subdivision or land; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is made pursuant to Section 212.071 & 212.072 of the Texas Local Government Code and Article 8, Section 8.4.1, of the Unified Development Code of the City of Corpus Christi NOW, THEREFORE, in order to provide a coordinated public street construction and improvement project, the City and the Developer agree as follows: Section 1. RECITALS. The parties agree that the language contained in the preamble of this Agreement is substantive in nature, is incorporated into this Agreement by reference, and has been relied on by both parties in entering into and executing this Agreement. Participation Agreement City Council March 16, 2021 with Southside Ventures III, LP. The purpose of this Resolution is to authorize a developer participation agreement with Southside Ventures III, LP to reimburse the developer up to $91,578.18 for the City’s share of the cost to construct Oso Parkway associated with a planned residential subdivision known as Cayo Del Oso Subdivision, Section 4. 2 Aerial Overview OSO PKWYDOVE HOLLOW LN ANCHORAGE DR. CR 7B OSO PARKWAY PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 3 Project Map Section to be completed when adjoining property to the south is developed CASH IN LIEU OF CONTRUCTION Cayo Del Oso Section 4OSO PARKWAY PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 4 The funding for this item will come from available funds from the 3701 - Developer Participation Bond 2012. The available unencumbered balance in this fund is: $201,474.22 Funding 5 Approval Staff recommends approval of the developer participation agreement with Southside Ventures III, LP to reimburse the developer up to $91,578.18 for the City’s share of the cost to constructOso Parkway. The request is in accordance with UDC Section 8.4 City Participation in Streets and DrainageCross Sections. Recommendation DATE: December 30, 2020 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, AIA, Director, Development Services Department AlRaymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3575 CAPTION: Zoning Case No. 1120-02, Ocean Harbor II, LLC (District 4). Ordinance rezoning property at or near 14805, 14809, 14813, and 14817 Windward Drive from the “RM- AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development SUMMARY: The purpose of the rezoning request is to develop a 44-unit townhome development. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The subject property is 2.13 acres in size and is currently zoned “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay and consists of vacant property and has remained undeveloped since annexation in 1981. To the north is a vacant property zoned “CR-2/IO” Resort Commercial with the Island Overlay and Beach Access Road 3A. To the south is a condo development (Nautilus Galleria) zoned “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay. To the east is a condo development (The Gulfstream Condominium) zoned “CR-1/IO” Resort Commercial with the Island Overlay. To the west is a townhome development (Village by the Beach) zoned “RS-TH/IO/PUD” Townhouse with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development. Conformity to City Policy The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang/Padre Island Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay and Planned Unit Development is consistent with the adopted Mustang/Padre Island ADP. The proposed rezoning is also consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Infill development should be encouraged at this site. PUDs allow flexibility for attractive, efficient design and can often reduce infrastructure installation and maintenance costs to the city. PUDs can encourage development on difficult sites. Additionally, PUDs are encouraged in the Mustang/Padre Island ADP. The PUD will allow for Daily, Weekly, and Monthly rentals. Rezoning a property at or near 14805, 14809, 14813, and 14817 Windward Drive AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 3/16/21 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 3/23/21 The current “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay allows this use today. Public Input Process Number of Notices Mailed 52 within 200-foot notification area 6 outside notification area As of December 30, 2020: In Favor 4 inside notification area 0 outside notification area In Opposition 0 inside notification area 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the 200-foot notification area* is in opposition. *Created by calculating the area of land immediately adjoining the subject property and extending 200-foot therefrom. The opposition is totaled by the total area of land that each individual property owner owns converted into a percentage of the total 200-foot notification area. Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the “CR-1/IO” Resort Commercial District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development Overlay on November 11, 2020. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Denial of the change of zoning from the “CR-1/IO” Resort Commercial District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development Overlay FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning request. Vote Count: For: 8 Opposed: 0 Absent: 1 Abstained: 0 LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Zoning Case No. 1120-02, Ocean Harbor II, LLC.: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 14805, 14809, 14813, and 14817 Windward Drive from the “RM- AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this rezoning is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this rezoning will promote the best and most orderly development of the properties affected thereby, and to be affected thereby, in the City of Corpus Christi. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described as Lots 1 thru 4, Padre Island-Corpus Christi Section A as shown in Exhibit “A”: from the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to the “RM- AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development The subject property is located at or near 14805, 14809, 14813, and 14817 Windward Drive. Exhibit A, which is a map of the subject property and Exhibit B, which is a copy of The Smuggler’s Cove (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan attached to and incorporated in this ordinance. SECTION 2. The Planned Unit Development Overlay granted in Section 1 of this ordinance is subject to the Owner following the conditions listed below: 1. Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan: The Owners shall develop the Property in accordance The Smuggler’s Cove (PUD) Guidelines and Page 2 of 5 Master Site Plan. The development of the Property is to consist of 44 single-family lots and 3 common area lots. 2. Dwelling Units per Acre: The density of dwelling units on the Property shall not exceed 21 dwelling units per acre. 3. Parking: The property must have a minimum of 1.75 parking spaces (9 feet wide by 18 feet long) per dwelling unit. 4. Setbacks and Lot Width: Minimum front yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten feet and on a corner ten feet. 5. Open Space: The Property must maintain a minimum of 25% open space. Any surfaces constructed within the required open space must be constructed of pervious material. 6. Private Street Access: On-street parking is prohibited. The 2-way private access drive shall not be less than 24 feet and the 1 foot ribbon curb shall be striped or marked to indicate “Fire Lane/No Parking.” 7. Pedestrian Access: Sidewalks shall be 6 feet wide on one side of the private street and shall be constructed as identified on the master site plan. 8. Other Requirements: The conditions listed herein do not preclude compliance with other applicable UDC, Building, and Fire Code Requirements. 9. Time Limit: An approved development plan shall expire 24 months after the date that the development plan was approved, unless a complete building permit application has been submitted or, if no building permit is required, a certificate of occupancy has been issued. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011 and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect including the penalties for violations as made and provided for in Article 10 of the UDC. SECTION 4. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the subject property that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of Page 3 of 5 the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and/or Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. This ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Page 4 of 5 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Page 5 of 5 Exhibit A SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 2 CONTENTS DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................................... 3 ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING ........................................................................................................................... 3 LOT LAYOUT .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 5 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ..................................................................................................................................... 5 OPEN SPACE LAYOUT .............................................................................................................................................. 7 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ....................................................................................................................... 8 PARKING REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 9 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ......................................................................................................................................... 9 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 3 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION Smuggler’s Cove, P.U.D., consists of a residential development of 2.13 acres, being all of Lots 1 thru 4, Padre Island-Corpus Christi Section A, of Volume 33, Pages 97-thru 99 M.R.N.C.T. The development is a planned community that will consist of 44 single-family lots and 3 common areas lots. The property currently is currently vacant land and is zoned Multifamily Apartment Tourist/Island Overlay (RM-AT/IO). The City of Corpus Christi Future Land Use Plan designates the area as mixed use. The proposed zoning is RM-AT/IO/PUD. The proposed density will be 21 units per acre. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING The following table indicates the Adjacent Land Use and Zoning at the time of the PUD: CURRENT LAND USE ZONING North of Property Vacant CR-2/IO South of Property Medium Density Residential RM-AT/IO East of Property High Density Residential CR-1/IO West of Property Medium Density Residential RS-TH/IO/PUD Development Location Park Rd. 22 N Bing Maps Imagery Year: 2020 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 4 LOT LAYOUT The following is the Lot Layout for the development: · 44 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 5 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS The following table indicates the Development Deviations for the Residential Lots: DESCRIPTION UDC- ZONING/PLATTING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS (RM-AT) PUD REQUIREMENTS Lot Area in Square Feet Minimum = 5,000 Maximum = N/A Minimum = 1,100 Maximum = N/A Lot Width at Front Yard Requirement Line in Feet Minimum = 50 Maximum = N/A Minimum = 17 Maximum = N/A Right-of-way / Access Easement 50 feet Minimum = 24 feet Pavement Width in Feet Minimum = 28 Minimum = 24 Yard Requirements (Minimum in Feet) Street – Non-Corner 20 10 Street – Corner 10 10 Side – Single 5 0 Side – Total 0 0 Rear 5 5 (Center of Alley) Open Space 25% 25% Curb Type Standard 6” Curb and Gutter 1’ Edge Curb Sidewalk 5’ width on both sides 6’ sidewalk on one side of private access drive Parking Spaces 2 per Unit = 88 1.75 per Unit = 77 Parking Guest Spaces 1 per 5 Units = 9 1 per 5 Units = 9 The following table indicates the Development Deviations for the Common Area Lots: DESCRIPTION UDC- OPEN AREA PUD REQUIREMENTS Parking requirement per Parks and Open Area in Square Feet 1 per 10,000 SF outdoor lot area = 3 1 per 10,000 SF* = 3 * – The development is designed to be walkable and the common areas are intended for the residences only. DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The following tables indicate the Development Guidelines for each lot type within the development: DEVELOPMENT LOTS DESCRIPTION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBERS Residential Lot(s) 1 1-44 Common Area and Access Easement Lot(s) 1 45-47 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 6 RESIDENTIAL LOTS DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS Usage Residential Open Space- Percent Minimum 25% Building Height – Maximum in Feet UDC 4.2.8 Building Spacing – Minimum in Feet 0 Parking Requirement Per Unit 1.75 Maintenance Lot Owner and/or Home Owners Association (HOA) Improvements Allowed Residential structure(s) and support structure(s) including decks, porches, pavements, fencing, landscaping, etc. Improvements Placement Shall not protrude into the yard or easement(s), or beyond the property line (whichever is applicable) except for pavements, fencing, and landscaping. Rental Daily, weekly, and monthly rentals are allowed COMMON AREA LOTS DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS Usage Non-Residential Structures and improvements supporting the Community Lot Area in Square Feet Minimum = N/A Maximum = N/A Lot Width at Front in Feet Minimum = N/A Maximum = N/A Yard Requirements (Minimum in Feet) Street – Non-Corner 10’ * Street – Corner N/A Side – Single 0 Side – Total 0 Rear 5’ (Center of Alley) Building Height – Maximum in Feet 1-story Building Spacing – Minimum in Feet As per International Building Code Landscape Requirement Will be determined during building permitting. Maintenance Home Owners Association (HOA) Improvements Allowed Community structures and support structures including decks, pool, porches, pavements, fencing, landscaping, utilities, etc. Improvements Placement Shall not protrude into the yard or easement(s), or beyond the property line (whichever is applicable) except for pavements, fencing, landscaping, utilities. * – Yard requirement is for Block 1, Lot 46 only. SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 7 OPEN SPACE LAYOUT The following is the Open Space Layout for the development: OPEN SPACE CALCULATION QUANTITY (SQUARE FEET) QUANTITY (ACRE) Total Area of PUD 92,783 2.13 Total Non-Open Space (Impervious Area) 1,2,3 59,318 1.36 64% Total Open Space (Pervious Area) 4 33,465 0.77 36% 1 Constructed building area 2 Driveway area 3 Area of all Pavement and Sidewalk 4 Minimum Open Space required is 25% SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 8 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The Vehicular and Pedestrian Access for the development is indicated below. The entrances into the development will provide a 24 foot clear entrance/exit for emergency vehicles. The private drive within the development will be a minimum of 24’ wide from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. The development will provide 6’ sidewalks on one side of the road to promote walkability and access to future amenities as indicated. SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 9 PARKING REQUIREMENTS The following is the Parking Requirements for the development: LOT TYPE REQUIREMENTS QUANTITY OF LOTS QUANTITY OF PARKING PROVIDED (PUD) Residential 1 1.75 per unit 44 77 Residential - Guest Parking 1 1 per 5 units 44 9 Common Area 1 per 10,000 SF 3 3 Total: 89 1 – Parking anywhere within the limits of the development. TYPICAL CROSS SECTION The following are Typical Cross Section(s) for the development: NOTE: The Right of Way is a Private Access Easement and Private Utility Easement. SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 10 Cross Section A Cross Section B LEEWARD DRWINDWARD DRST BARTHOLOMEW AVE BEACH ACCESS 3-A RD VILLAGE BEACH DR VILLAGE BEACH WAY C R -1CR-1IOIO C R -2CR-2IOIO R M -A TRM-A TIOIORS-T HRS-T HIO/P U DIO/P U D R M -A TRM-A TIOIO R S -T HRS-T HIO/P U DIO/P U D Gulf of MexicoSTATE HYW 361PARK RD 22WHITECAP µ Corpus Christi Bay 0 500250Feet LOCATION MAP Date Created: 10/28/2020Prepared By: ReyRDepartment of Development Services SUBJECTPROPERTY SUBJECTPROPERTY C A S E : 1 1 2 0 -0 2 SubjectProperty A e r i a l w i t h S u b j e c t P r o p e r t y Map Scale: 1:1,800 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 1120-02 INFOR No. 20ZN1026 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 11, 2020 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: Ocean Harbor II, LLC. Applicant: Hanson Professional Services, Inc. Location Address: 14805, 14809, 14813, and 14817 Windward Drive Legal Description: Lots 1 thru 4, Padre Island-Corpus Christi Section A, located along the west side of Windward Drive, south of St. Bartholomew Drive, and north of Robla Drive. Zoning Request From: “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay To: “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay with a Planned Unit Development Area: 2.13 total acres Purpose of Request: To develop a 44-unit townhome development. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT with the Island Overlay Vacant Mixed Use North “CR-2/IO” Resort Commercial with the Island Overlay Vacant Planned Development South “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT with the Island Overlay Medium Density Residential Mixed Use East “CR-1/IO” Resort Commercial with the Island Overlay High Density Residential Mixed Use West “RS-TH/IO/PUD” Townhouse with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development Medium Density Residential Mixed Use ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan and is planned for mixed uses. The proposed rezoning to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map which calls for mixed uses. Map No.: 028026 City Council District: 4 Zoning Violations: None Staff Report Page 2 Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 400 feet of street frontage along Windward Drive which is designated as an “C1” Minor Collector Street and 230 feet of street frontage along St. Bartholomew Drive which is designated as a “C1” Minor Collector Street. According to the Urban Transportation Plan, “C1” Minor Collector Streets can convey a capacity up to 500 Average Daily Trips (ADT). Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Windward Drive “C1” Minor Collector 60’ ROW 40’ paved 100’ ROW 60’ paved N/A St. Bartholomew Avenue “C1” Minor Collector 60’ ROW 40’ paved 100’ ROW 30’ paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development to allow for a 44-unit townhome development. Development Plan: The subject property is a total of 2.13 acres in size. Smuggler’s Cove, Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a planned community that will consist of 44 single- family lots and 3 common areas lots. Minimum Dimensions “RM-AT” District Standards “RS-TH” District Standards Proposed PUD Deviation Lot Area 5,000 sf. 1,600 sf. 1,100 sf. Yes Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 16 ft. 17 ft. Yes Front Yard 20 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Yes Front Yard (Corner) 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. No Side Yard 5 ft. 0 ft. 5 ft. No Rear Yard 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. No Open Space 25% 30% 25% No Paved Street Width 28 ft. 28 ft. 24 ft. Yes Curb Type 6-in. curb & gutter 6-in. curb & gutter 1 ft. ribbon curb Yes Parking Requirement 1.5/ unit(1 bedroom) 2/ unit (2 bedroom) 1/5 units (guests) Com: 1:250 sf. 1.5/ unit(1 bedroom) 2/ unit (2 bedroom) 1/5 units (guests) Com: 1:250 sf 1.75 parking spaces per unit (Totaling 77 spaces) Yes Sidewalks 5 ft. on both sides or 6 ft. on both sides of private streets 5 ft. on both sides or 6 ft. on both sides of private streets 6 ft. sidewalk on one side of the private street Yes Staff Report Page 3 Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay and consists of vacant property and has remained undeveloped since annexation in 1981. To the north is a vacant property zoned “CR-2/IO” Resort Commercial with the Island Overlay and Beach Access Road 3A. To the south is a condo development (Nautilus Galleria) zoned “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay. To the east is a condo development (The Gulfstream Condominium) zoned “CR-1/IO” Resort Commercial with the Island Overlay. To the west is a townhome development (Village by the Beach) zoned “RS-TH/IO/PUD” Townhouse with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy’s Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The property is platted. Utilities: Water: 8-inch ACP line located along St. Bartholomew Avenue. Wastewater: 8-inch VCP line located along the rear alleyway Gas: 2-inch line located along the rear alleyway. Storm Water: 18-inch line located along St. Bartholomew Avenue. Plan CC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang/Padre Island Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay and Planned Unit Development is consistent with the adopted Mustang/Padre Island ADP. The proposed rezoning is also consistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan: • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Encourage residential infill development on vacant lots within or adjacent to existing neighborhoods. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 3). • Tourist-oriented business and development will continue to be encouraged and promoted by all agencies of the City as illustrated on the Future Land Use Map. This includes commercial ventures, condominiums and resorts, fishing and outdoor recreation facilities, and recreational vehicle parks (Policy Statement B.2). • The designation of “Mixed Use” in the Future Land Use Plan expresses the City’s desire to mix residential and non-residential uses. (Policy Statement B.10). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is compatible with the Future Land Use Map, Plan CC, and the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning is also compatible with neighboring properties and with the general character of the surrounding area. This rezoning does not have a negative impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Staff Report Page 4 • The property is currently vacant, zoned “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with an Island Overlay, and has never been developed. • Surrounding properties have been rezoned within the past decade indicating a pattern towards high density residential and commercial development. The zoning pattern is in line with a Plan CC policy statement of creating urban villages and accommodating continuous growth. • The PUD will allow Daily, Weekly, and Monthly rentals. The current “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay allows this use today. • Infill development should be encouraged at this site. PUDs allow flexibility for attractive, efficient design and can often reduce infrastructure installation and maintenance costs to the city. PUDs can encourage development on difficult sites. Additionally, PUDs are encouraged in the Mustang/Padre Island ADP. • Staff finds that the proposed deviations are acceptable, and the request has been approved by the Technical Review Committee (TRC). Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (November 11, 2020): Approval of the change of zoning from the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development Overlay with the following conditions: 1. Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan: The Owners shall develop the Property in accordance The Smuggler’s Cove (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan. The development of the Property is to consist of 44 single-family lots and 3 common area lots. 2. Dwelling Units per Acre: The density of dwelling units on the Property shall not exceed 21 dwelling units per acre. 3. Parking: The property must have a minimum of 1.75 parking spaces (9 feet wide by 18 feet long) per dwelling unit. 4. Setbacks and Lot Width: Minimum front yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten feet and on a corner ten feet. 5. Open Space: The Property must maintain a minimum of 25% open space. Any surfaces constructed within the required open space must be constructed of pervious material. 6. Private Street Access: On-street parking is prohibited. The 2-way private access drive shall not be less than 24 feet and the 1 foot ribbon curb shall be striped or marked to indicate “Fire Lane/No Parking.” 7. Pedestrian Access: Sidewalks shall be 6 feet wide on one side of the private street and shall be constructed as identified on the master site plan. 8. Other Requirements: The conditions listed herein do not preclude compliance with other applicable UDC, Building, and Fire Code Requirements. Staff Report Page 5 9. Time Limit: An approved development plan shall expire 24 months after the date that the development plan was approved, unless a complete building permit application has been submitted or, if no building permit is required, a certificate of occupancy has been issued. Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed – 59 within 200-foot notification area 5 outside notification area UAs of December 30, 2020U: In Favor – 4 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area In Opposition – 0 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the 200-foot notification area* is in opposition. *Created by calculating the area of land immediately adjoining the subject property and extending 200-foot therefrom. The opposition is totaled by the total area of land that each individual property owner owns converted into a percentage of the total 200-foot notification area. Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) C. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan Staff Report Page 6 Staff Report Page 7 Staff Report Page 8 Staff Report Page 9 Staff Report Page 10 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 2 CONTENTS DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................................... 3 ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING ........................................................................................................................... 3 LOT LAYOUT .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 5 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ..................................................................................................................................... 5 OPEN SPACE LAYOUT .............................................................................................................................................. 7 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ....................................................................................................................... 8 PARKING REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 9 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ......................................................................................................................................... 9 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 3 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION Smuggler’s Cove, P.U.D., consists of a residential development of 2.13 acres, being all of Lots 1 thru 4, Padre Island-Corpus Christi Section A, of Volume 33, Pages 97-thru 99 M.R.N.C.T. The development is a planned community that will consist of 44 single-family lots and 3 common areas lots. The property currently is currently vacant land and is zoned Multifamily Apartment Tourist/Island Overlay (RM-AT/IO). The City of Corpus Christi Future Land Use Plan designates the area as mixed use. The proposed zoning is RM-AT/IO/PUD. The proposed density will be 21 units per acre. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING The following table indicates the Adjacent Land Use and Zoning at the time of the PUD: CURRENT LAND USE ZONING North of Property Vacant CR-2/IO South of Property Medium Density Residential RM-AT/IO East of Property High Density Residential CR-1/IO West of Property Medium Density Residential RS-TH/IO/PUD Development Location Park Rd. 22 N Bing Maps Imagery Year: 2020 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 4 LOT LAYOUT The following is the Lot Layout for the development: · 44 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 5 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS The following table indicates the Development Deviations for the Residential Lots: DESCRIPTION UDC- ZONING/PLATTING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS (RM-AT) PUD REQUIREMENTS Lot Area in Square Feet Minimum = 5,000 Maximum = N/A Minimum = 1,100 Maximum = N/A Lot Width at Front Yard Requirement Line in Feet Minimum = 50 Maximum = N/A Minimum = 17 Maximum = N/A Right-of-way / Access Easement 50 feet Minimum = 24 feet Pavement Width in Feet Minimum = 28 Minimum = 24 Yard Requirements (Minimum in Feet) Street – Non-Corner 20 10 Street – Corner 10 10 Side – Single 5 0 Side – Total 0 0 Rear 5 5 (Center of Alley) Open Space 25% 25% Curb Type Standard 6” Curb and Gutter 1’ Edge Curb Sidewalk 5’ width on both sides 6’ sidewalk on one side of private access drive Parking Spaces 2 per Unit = 88 1.75 per Unit = 77 Parking Guest Spaces 1 per 5 Units = 9 1 per 5 Units = 9 The following table indicates the Development Deviations for the Common Area Lots: DESCRIPTION UDC- OPEN AREA PUD REQUIREMENTS Parking requirement per Parks and Open Area in Square Feet 1 per 10,000 SF outdoor lot area = 3 1 per 10,000 SF* = 3 * – The development is designed to be walkable and the common areas are intended for the residences only. DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The following tables indicate the Development Guidelines for each lot type within the development: DEVELOPMENT LOTS DESCRIPTION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBERS Residential Lot(s) 1 1-44 Common Area and Access Easement Lot(s) 1 45-47 SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 6 RESIDENTIAL LOTS DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS Usage Residential Open Space- Percent Minimum 25% Building Height – Maximum in Feet UDC 4.2.8 Building Spacing – Minimum in Feet 0 Parking Requirement Per Unit 1.75 Maintenance Lot Owner and/or Home Owners Association (HOA) Improvements Allowed Residential structure(s) and support structure(s) including decks, porches, pavements, fencing, landscaping, etc. Improvements Placement Shall not protrude into the yard or easement(s), or beyond the property line (whichever is applicable) except for pavements, fencing, and landscaping. Rental Daily, weekly, and monthly rentals are allowed COMMON AREA LOTS DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS Usage Non-Residential Structures and improvements supporting the Community Lot Area in Square Feet Minimum = N/A Maximum = N/A Lot Width at Front in Feet Minimum = N/A Maximum = N/A Yard Requirements (Minimum in Feet) Street – Non-Corner 10’ * Street – Corner N/A Side – Single 0 Side – Total 0 Rear 5’ (Center of Alley) Building Height – Maximum in Feet 1-story Building Spacing – Minimum in Feet As per International Building Code Landscape Requirement Will be determined during building permitting. Maintenance Home Owners Association (HOA) Improvements Allowed Community structures and support structures including decks, pool, porches, pavements, fencing, landscaping, utilities, etc. Improvements Placement Shall not protrude into the yard or easement(s), or beyond the property line (whichever is applicable) except for pavements, fencing, landscaping, utilities. * – Yard requirement is for Block 1, Lot 46 only. SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 7 OPEN SPACE LAYOUT The following is the Open Space Layout for the development: OPEN SPACE CALCULATION QUANTITY (SQUARE FEET) QUANTITY (ACRE) Total Area of PUD 92,783 2.13 Total Non-Open Space (Impervious Area) 1,2,3 59,318 1.36 64% Total Open Space (Pervious Area) 4 33,465 0.77 36% 1 Constructed building area 2 Driveway area 3 Area of all Pavement and Sidewalk 4 Minimum Open Space required is 25% SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 8 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The Vehicular and Pedestrian Access for the development is indicated below. The entrances into the development will provide a 24 foot clear entrance/exit for emergency vehicles. The private drive within the development will be a minimum of 24’ wide from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. The development will provide 6’ sidewalks on one side of the road to promote walkability and access to future amenities as indicated. SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 9 PARKING REQUIREMENTS The following is the Parking Requirements for the development: LOT TYPE REQUIREMENTS QUANTITY OF LOTS QUANTITY OF PARKING PROVIDED (PUD) Residential 1 1.75 per unit 44 77 Residential - Guest Parking 1 1 per 5 units 44 9 Common Area 1 per 10,000 SF 3 3 Total: 89 1 – Parking anywhere within the limits of the development. TYPICAL CROSS SECTION The following are Typical Cross Section(s) for the development: NOTE: The Right of Way is a Private Access Easement and Private Utility Easement. SMUGGLER’S COVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Page 10 Cross Section A Cross Section B Ocean Harbor II, LLC. Rezoning for a Property at 14805 Windward Drive From “RM-AT/IO” To “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Zoning Case #1120-02 N City Council March 16, 2021 2 Aerial Overview N 3 Adjacent Development and Zoning Pattern N 4 PUD Deviations Minimum Dimensions “RM-AT” District Standards “RS-TH” District Standards Proposed PUD Deviation Lot Area 5,000 sf.1,600 sf.1,100 sf.Yes Minimum Lot Width 50 ft.16 ft.17 ft.Yes Front Yard 20 ft.10 ft.10 ft.Yes Front Yard (Corner)10 ft.10 ft.10 ft.No Side Yard 5 ft.0 ft.5 ft.No Rear Yard 5 ft.5 ft.5 ft.No Open Space 25%30%25%No Paved Street Width 28 ft.28 ft.24 ft.Yes Curb Type 6-in. curb & gutter 6-in. curb & gutter 1 ft. ribbon curb Yes Parking Requirement 1.5/ unit(1 bedroom) 2/ unit (2 bedroom) 1/5 units (guests) Com: 1:250 sf. 1.5/ unit(1 bedroom) 2/ unit (2 bedroom) 1/5 units (guests) Com: 1:250 sf 1.75 parking spaces per unit (Totaling 77 spaces) Yes Sidewalks 5 ft. on both sides or 6 ft. on both sides of private streets 5 ft. on both sides or 6 ft. on both sides of private streets 6 ft. sidewalk on one side of the private street Yes 5 Master Site Plan 6 Public Notification 59 Notices mailed inside 200’ buffer 5 Notices mailed outside 200’ buffer Notification Area Opposed: 0 (0.00%) In Favor: 4 Separate Opposed Owners: 0 Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition N 7 Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation Approval of the “RM-AT/IO/PUD” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development as per the Smuggler’s Cove Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan. DATE: January 13, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, AIA, Director Development Services Department AlRaymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3575 CAPTION: Zoning Case No. 1220-02, Mario A. Martinez Holdings, LLC.: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning a property at or near 14725 Running Light Drive from the “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay. SUMMARY: The purpose of the zoning request is to allow for the construction of condos and townhomes. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The subject property is 1.15 acres in size. The subject property is currently zoned “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay. The property was annexed in 1989. Conformity to City Policy The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Padre/Mustang Island Area Development Plan and is planned for a Medium Density Residential use s. The proposed rezoning to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay is generally consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) and does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent residential or multifamily properties. Surrounding properties have been rezoned to high density residential multifamily zoning districts indicating a pattern towards multifamily or rental communities in a townhouse or condominium style. If the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay is approved, the condominium/ townhouse development will need to abide all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC). Specifically, Section 6.4 -IO, Island Overlay includes design characteristics for the development in the Island Overlay. Public Input Process Number of Notices Mailed 38 within 200-foot notification area 1 outside notification area Rezoning a property at or near 14725 Running Light Drive AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 3/16/21 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 3/23/21 As of December 3 , 2020: In Favor 0 inside notification area 0 outside notification area In Opposition 3 inside notification area 0 outside notification area Totaling 11.25% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the “RS-6/IO” Single- Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay on December 9, 2020. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning request. Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the “RS-6/IO” Single- Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay with following vote count. Vote Count: For: 9 Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 0 LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Case No. 1220-02, Mario A. Martinez Holdings, LLC.: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning a property at or near 14725 Running Light Drive from the “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this rezoning is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this rezoning will promote the best and most orderly development of the properties affected thereby, and to be affected thereby, in the City of Corpus Christi. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 3, Padre Island Section E, as shown in Exhibit “A”: from the “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay The subject property is located at or near 14725 Running Light Drive. Exhibit A, which is a map of the subject property attached to and incorporated in this ordinance. SECTION 2. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011 and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect including the penalties for violations as made and provided for in Article 10 of the UDC. SECTION 3. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. Page 2 of 4 SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the subject property that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 5. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and/or Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Page 3 of 4 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez _______________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 12020-02 INFOR No. 20ZN1028 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 9, 2020 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: Mario A. Martinez Holdings, LLC Applicant: Mario A. Martinez Holdings, LLC Location Address: 14737, 14733, 14729, and 14725 Running Light Drive Legal Description: Lots 2,3, 4, and 5, Block 3, Padre Island Section E, located along the south side of Running Light Drive and west of Aruba Drive. Zoning Request From: “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay To: “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay Area: 1.15 Acres Purpose of Request: to allow for the development of condos and townhomes that will be rented. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with Island Overlay Vacant Medium Density Single Family Residential North “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District and “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District Vacant Medium Density Single Family Residential South “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District Water Water East “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District Vacant Medium Density Single Family Residential West “RS-TH/IO/PUD” Townhouse District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development Medium Density Residential Medium Density Single Family Residential ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Padre/Mustang Island Area Development Plan and is planned for Medium Density Residential uses. The proposed rezoning to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay is partially consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) and warrants an amendment to the Future Land Use Map. Map No.: 028026 City Council District: 4 Zoning Violations: None Staff Report Page 2 Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 200 feet of street frontage along Running Light Drive which is designated as a Local street. According to the Urban Transportation Plan, Local Streets can convey a capacity of up to 500 Average Daily Trips (ADT). Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Running Light Drive Local Street 50’ ROW 28’ paved 60’ ROW 36’ paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the “RS-6/IO” Single- Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay to allow for the construction of condominiums and townhomes. Development Plan: The subject property is 1.15 acres in size. The applicant has not submitted any specific plans concerning the condominium and townhouse development. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned “RS-6/IO” Single- Family 6 District with the Island Overlay, consists of vacant land, and has remained undeveloped since annexation in 1989. To the north is a vacant land zoned “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay and “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay. To the south is a navigation channel. To the east is vacant land zoned “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay. To the west is townhouse development/ planned unit development zoned “RS-TH/IO/PUD” Townhouse District with the Island Overlay and a Planned Unit Development. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy’s Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The property is platted. Utilities: Water: 8-inch ACP line located along Running Light Drive Wastewater: 8-inch VCP line located along Running Light Drive. Gas: 2-inch Gas Main approximately 500 feet to the east at Leeward Drive. Storm Water: Storm Basin is Laguna Madre with conveyance to the navigation channel in in the southwest (rear). Plan CC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Padre/Mustang Island and is planned for MediumDensity Residential. The proposed rezoning to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Staff Report Page 3 Island Overlay is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC). The following policies should be considered: • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Encourage residential infill development on vacant lots within or adjacent to existing neighborhoods (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 3). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is partially consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC), compatible with the adjoining residential properties, and does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent commercial properties. • The property is currently vacant. The subject property has never been developed. • Surrounding properties have been rezoned to medium density residential multifamily zoning districts indicating a pattern towards multifamily or rental communities in a townhouse or condominium style. • If the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay is approved, the condominium/ townhouse development will need to abide all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC). • Specifically, Section 6.4 -IO, Island Overlay includes design characteristics of for the development in the Island Overlay. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (December 9, 2020): Approval of the change of zoning from “RS-6/IO” Single-Family 6 District with the Island Overlay to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay. Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed – 38 within 200-foot notification area 1 outside notification area As of December 3, 2020: In Favor – 0 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area In Opposition – 3 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area Totaling 11.25% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) Staff Report Page 4 Staff Report Page 5 Staff Report Page 6 Staff Report Page 7 Mario A. Martinez Holdings, LLC. Rezoning for a properties at 14725 Running Light Drive: From “RS-6/IO” to “RM-AT/IO” Zoning Case #1220-02 City Council March 16, 2021 2 Aerial Overview N 3 Adjacent Development and Zoning Pattern N 4 Public Notification 38 Notices mailed inside 200’ buffer 1 Notices mailed outside 200’ buffer Notification Area Opposed: 3 (11.25%) In Favor: 0 X Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition Separate Opposed Owners: 3 X X N 5 Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation Approval of the change of zoning to the “RM-AT/IO” Multifamily AT District with the Island Overlay DATE: January 13, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, AIA, Director Development Services Department AlRaymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3575 CAPTION: Zoning Case No. 1220-03, The Episcopal Church Corporation in West Texas: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 4518 Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District. SUMMARY: The purpose of the zoning request is to allow for the construction of a professional office building. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The subject property is 1.50 acres in size. The subject property is currently zoned “RS-6” Single Family 6 District and is a portion of a larger 2.50 acre property. The property was annexed in 1962. Conformity to City Policy The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan and is planned for a Medium-Density Residential use. The proposed rezoning to the “ON” Neighborhood Office District is generally consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) and does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent residential or multifamily properties. The property is currently occupied by a vacant church with associated parking. Surrounding properties have been established single-family residential neighborhoods and multifamily residential for the last 40 to 50 years. Public Input Process Number of Notices Mailed 26 within 200-foot notification area 8 outside notification area Rezoning a property at or near 4518 Saratoga Boulevard (SH 357) AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 02/16/21 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 02/23/21 As of March 12, 2021: In Favor 9 inside notification area 0 outside notification area In Opposition 20 inside notification area 5 outside notification area Totaling 8.69% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District on December 9, 2020. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approval of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District. (3/4 vote to overturn Planning Commission’s recommendation) FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning request. Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District with following vote count. Vote Count: For: 9 Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 0 LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Case No. 1220-03, The Episcopal Church Corporation in West Texas: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 4518 Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this rezoning is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this rezoning will promote the best and most orderly development of the properties affected thereby, and to be affected thereby, in the City of Corpus Christi. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described as being a 1.50 Acre Zoning Tract, being a portion of Lot 10, Block 49, Country Club Estates Unit 11, as recorded in Volume 34, Page 2, of the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit “A”: from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “ON” Neighborhood Office District The subject property is located at or near 4518 Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357). Exhibit A, which is the Metes and Bounds of the subject property with an associated map attached to and incorporated in this ordinance. SECTION 2. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011 and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect including the penalties for violations as made and provided for in Article 10 of the UDC. SECTION 3. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the Page 2 of 5 City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the subject property that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 5. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and/or Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Page 3 of 5 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez _______________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A Page 5 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 1220-03 INFOR No. 20ZN1029 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 9, 2020 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: The Episcopal Church Corporation in West Texas Applicant: Urban Engineering Location Address: 4518 Saratoga Boulevard Legal Description: Being 1.50 Acre Zoning Tract, being a portion of Lot 10, Block 49, Country Club Estates Unit 11, as recorded in Volume 34, Page 2, of the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, located along the north side of Saratoga Blvd (State Highway 357), the west side of Brisbane Drive, east of Swansea Drive, and south of Clearwater Drive. Zoning Request From: “RS-6” Single Family 6 District To: “ON” Office Neighborhood District Area: 1.50 Acres Purpose of Request: To allow for the development of a two to three-story professional office building to be constructed. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site “RS-6” Single Family Residential District Public Semi-Public Medium Density Single Family Residential North “RS-6” Single Family Residential District Low Density Residential Medium Density Single Family Residential South “RS-6” Single Family Residential District Low Density Residential Medium Density Single Family Residential East “RM-1” Multifamily District Medium Density Residential High Density Single Family Residential West “RS-6” Single Family Residential District Low Density Residential Medium Density Single Family Residential ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan and is planned for Medium Density Single Family Residential. The proposed rezoning to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District is partially consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) and warrants an amendment to the Future Land Use Map. Map No.: 045034 Zoning Violations: None Staff Report Page 2 Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 275 feet of street frontage along Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) which is designated as a “A3” Primary Arterial Street. According to the Urban Transportation Plan, “A3” Primary Arterial Streets can convey a capacity between 30,000 to 48,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT). The property also has approximately 435 feet of street frontage along Brisbane Drive, which is designated as a Local Street. According to the Urban Transportation Plan, Local Streets can convey up to 500 Average Daily Trips (ADT). Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Saratoga Boulevard (SH 357) “A3” Primary Arterial 130’ ROW 79’ paved 120’ ROW 72’ paved 34,786 ADT (2018) Brisbane Drive Local Street 50’ ROW 28’ paved 60’ ROW 36’ paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the “RS-6” Single Family Residential District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District to allow for the construction of a professional office building. Development Plan: The subject property is 1.50 acres in size and is a portion of a larger 2.50 acre property. The remaining portion of the property will remain zoned “RS-6” Single- Family 6 District. The applicant has not submitted any specific plans concerning professional office development. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned “RS-6” Single Family 6 District and consists of a Church built approximately in the early 1980’s. To the north is a single family subdivision established in the late 1960’s and zoned “RS-6” Single- Family 6 District. To the south is Saratoga Boulevard constructed in 1967. To the east is Brisbane Drive and the County Club Townhomes which are zoned “RM-1” and “RM-3” Multifamily Residential. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy’s Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The property is platted. Utilities: Water: 12-inch ACP line located along Saratoga Blvd, and a 6-inch ACP line along Brisbane Drive Wastewater: 8-inch VCP line located along the north and western property line Gas: 6-inch Gas Main runs along Saratoga Blvd, and a 2-inch Gas main runs along the northern and western property line. Staff Report Page 3 Storm Water: Storm Basin is Osos Creek, with conveyance to Saratoga and Brisbane. 30-inch public storm pipe runs from a Brisbane storm inlet location. Plan CC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan and is planned for a Medium- Density Residential use. The proposed rezoning to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District is partially consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC). The following policies should be considered: • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Support having a stakeholder committee to develop design standards and policies for areas of the city where deemed appropriate. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 3). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is partially consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC), is compatible with the adjoining residential properties, and does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent residential or multifamily properties. • The property is currently occupied by a vacant church with associated parking. • Surrounding properties have been established single-family residential neighborhoods and multifamily residential for the last 40 to 50 years. • “The Neighborhood Office zoning district provides a location for office development. The uses allowed have relatively low traffic generation. Areas of the Neighborhood Office zoning district may be appropriate adjacent to most residential uses, and as a transition between residential and nonresidential areas.” (UDC Section 4.5.1) • If the “ON” Office Neighborhood District is approved, the professional office development will need to abide all requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC). • Specifically, Section 7.9.6 Zoning District Buffer Yards, which would impose a Type B buffer yard between the development and adjacent properties. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single Family Residential District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District. Planning Commission Recommendation (December 9, 2020): Denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single Family Residential District to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District. Staff Report Page 4 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed – 26 within 200-foot notification area 8 outside notification area As of March 12, 2021: In Favor – 9 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area In Opposition – 20 inside notification area – 5 outside notification area Totaling 8.69% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. *Created by calculating the area of land immediately adjoining the subject property and extending 200-foot therefrom. The opposition is totaled by the total area of land that each individual property owner owns converted into a percentage of the total 200-foot notification area. Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) Staff Report Page 5 From:Sheri Bihner To:Craig Garrison Subject:Rezoning Case # 1220-03 Date:Sunday, December 6, 2020 4:08:52 PM [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] Dear Mr. Garison: We are writing you to express our concerns about the proposed rezoning of the Episcopal Church property at 4518 Saratoga Blvd. We hope that the City Planning Commission will recommend that the City Council deny the proposed rezoning of the property. Our property is on the corner of Clearwater Dr. and Brisbane. Our backyard is adjacent to the church parking lot. We are concerned about the following issues: 1. If the property's only entrances are on Brisbane, a business there would greatly increase traffic which would pose greater risk for children playing in the park on Brisbane and Congressional. 2. We have lived here since 1996 and since then the church was our neighbor. We only had to contend with extra traffic a few times a week and only for short periods. Our driveway is accessed using Brisbane and the extra traffic from businesses on the former church property could be a nightmare each time we try to leave the house. 3. Several-story office buildings would not only increase traffic but would create privacy issues since people could look directly into our backyard. 4. If multi-family buildings were constructed on the property, they would create a major increase in traffic and noise for our property. Having that kind of commercial property right behind our house could potentially negatively affect our future property values. Thank you for consideration of our concerns over the proposed rezoning. If the proposed changes are allowed, it would have a serious negative affect on our daily lives at all times of each day. Sincerely, Thomas R. Bihner and Sheri Bihner 4529 Clearwater Dr. Property Owner ID 22 From:Deanna Stevens To:Catherine Garza; Craig Garrison Subject:Rezoning Case No. 1220-03 Date:Saturday, December 5, 2020 8:16:11 PM [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] I received the attached Public Hearing Notice (Case No. 1220-03) regarding the petition by the Episcopal Church for the City of Corpus Christi to consider a zoning change from Single Family Residential (RS-6) to Office Neighborhood (ON) for the property at 4518 Saratoga Blvd. I live behind the property at 4517 Clearwater Dr., and I oppose the zoning change. Please recommend that City Council deny the petition and please do not recommend an intermediate zoning classification and/or special permit. Please keep the zoning Single Family Residential in accordance with the Goals and Strategies in Plan CC’s Vision for Housing & Neighborhoods, adopted by City Council, that states that Corpus Christi “sustains and maintains established neighborhoods” to keep them safe and free from crime. The Planning Commission can also recommend that the petitioner seek a buyer interested in building single-family residences such as townhouses to “encourage residential infill development on vacant lots within or adjacent to existing neighborhoods” as stated in Plan CC’s Goals and Strategies for Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design. Quality of life and safe, quiet, residential neighborhoods are a cornerstone to successful communities. There are numerous commercial/retail/office properties currently located across the street along the southwest and southeast corners of Saratoga and Everhart to support business growth. Please consider this matter as if you lived behind the property in question, and again, please recommend to deny the zoning change request. Thank you, Deanna Stevens 4517 Clearwater Dr., Corpus Christi, TX (361) 728-9709 From:Gene Di Russo To:Craig Garrison Subject:Rezoning case 1220-03 Date:Monday, December 7, 2020 12:52:05 PM [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] ________________________________ Achille Di Russo 4525 Clearwater 78413 From:Lanette Joubert To:Craig Garrison; Catherine Garza Subject:Re: Rezoning Case No. 1220-03 - The Episcopal Church Corp. of West Texas Date:Sunday, December 6, 2020 8:37:47 PM [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please ignore the email accidentally sent at 8:12 p,.m. 12/6/2020. My name is Lanette Smith Joubert and I have lived at 4502 Greensboro Dr., Corpus Christi, Texas since 1983. I received a copy of the City Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice on the Episcopal Church Corporation in West Texas petition for the rezoning of the property described in the notice and commonly known as 4518 Saratoga Blvd., Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas. I strongly oppose the rezoning of the property from single family to office neighborhood. This neighborhood is quiet with well-kept homes generally occupied by the owners. The broad categories of possible structures that could be built on the rezoned property mean that we could have a restaurant/bar in that location or a three story office building with retail space. Such a structure would destroy the neighborhood and lower property values in the area. I can't imagine a single structure in that range of possible businesses that would enhance or benefit the neighborhood or area. While my property is not abbutting the subject property, lower property values in the area would adversely affect my property value. I strongly urge the City Planning Commission to deny the petition for rezoning as proposed. Thank you. Lanette Smith Joubert 361-855-3617 On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 8:12 PM Lanette Joubert <lsjfamilylaw@gmail.com> wrote:TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: -- Lanette Smith Joubert ATTORNEY AT LAW 405 N. Tancahua (78401) P.O. Box 23 (78403) Corpus Christi, Texas Office: 361-887-6661 Fax: 361-887-9377 email: lsjfamilylaw@gmail.com -- Lanette Smith Joubert ATTORNEY AT LAW 405 N. Tancahua (78401) P.O. Box 23 (78403) Corpus Christi, Texas Office: 361-887-6661 Fax: 361-887-9377 email: lsjfamilylaw@gmail.com From:Michael W. Gordon To:Craig Garrison; Catherine Garza Cc:Beth Padgett Subject:Rezoning case # 1220-03 (4518 Saratoga Blvd.) Date:Monday, December 7, 2020 3:29:51 PM Attachments:image002.png [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] To whom it my concern – As one of the nearby (6413 Swansea) homeowners to the subject property I am greatly concerned about the proposed rezoning. First and foremost this is a residential area/neighborhood and as a matter of property values, public safety and aesthetics, putting an office building in the middle of it runs counter to the fundamental purpose of having residential zones, and indeed to the purpose of having zoning restrictions at all. If we are going to allow exceptions that completely defeat the purpose of zoning laws any time someone wants to build something that will change the nature of a neighborhood, then why bother with having zoning laws at all? There is plenty of available space in CC in areas that are already zoned for the type of construction being proposed at 4518 Saratoga. The developers should look there to locate their project. Additionally, although the current proposal is for a “2 or 3 story office building”, I see nothing in the rezoning proposal that limits development of a different kind should the zoning change occur. At one time there was an effort to put a funeral home on that lot – who’s to say that if the current zoning restrictions are changed the development plan wouldn’t be changed to a funeral home, or an 8 story office building, or anything else? Even in the event that zoning is changed and indeed this results in a 2-3 story office building for “professional offices” located on that site – what sort of professionals will lease those offices? We could have counselors who treat sex offenders with offices across the street from a park full of kids. Does that seem like a good idea? Finally there is the matter of the purpose behind zoning restrictions. I touched on this earlier but to be more specific, when a potential home buyer looks for the right home – location is one of the primary considerations. People who choose to invest in home ownership have the right to expect that when they buy a home in a single family residential area, that area will remain as such, with all that implies as far as property values, traffic, safety and quality of living. If one doesn’t mind living in a mixed residential/commercial area then there are similar houses there than can be purchased for a lower price – precisely because they are in a less desirable area. Stability is one of the most important factors in choosing a neighborhood, and that is one of the main reasons we have zoning laws in the first place. Even within single family residential areas, the homes near the border to a commercial area will be valued at less than similar homes farther into the same residential area. Why? Because the homes near the commercial areas are less desirable than the homes deeper into the residential zone. And why is that the case? Because of more traffic, more noise, more privacy concerns and more worries about safety. My wife and I bought our home in November of 2003, deliberately choosing a single family residential area so that we could raise our children in safety, without having to worry about them going to play at the nearby park (County Club Park – right across the street from the subject property), and so that we could generally enjoy the benefits of living in this type of neighborhood. We could have bought in a mixed-use area and probably could have gotten more house per dollar there – but we didn’t do that. We invested in a home in a single family and residential only neighborhood because that’s where we wanted to live. We were willing to (and did) pay more for our house because of that. We believed that our home would better hold its value because of that. It is not fair to us – or the other homeowners in the area – to change the rules in the middle of the game because someone wants to build an office building. Please register our strong opposition to the rezoning of the property at 4518 Saratoga Blvd. Michael W. Gordon Assistant District Attorney Chief Felony & Misdemeanor Prosecutor Nueces County District Attorney’s Office 901 Leopard, Room 206 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 (361) 888-0410 (phone) (361) 888-0474 (fax) Michael.gordon@nuecesco.com DA.efile@nuecesco.com Personal and Confidential The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient named above. This message may attorney-client communication and/or may be attorney work product and as such is privileged and confidential. The attorney-client privilege and attorney privilege are expressly retained and intended to be preserved if the reader of this message is not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return to us by mail. From:Bert Richmer To:Craig Garrison; Catherine Garza Subject:Case 1220-03 - Rezoning of Property at Brisbane and Saratoga Date:Monday, December 7, 2020 10:54:02 AM [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] HI - My name is Gary Richmer. I live at 4406 Clearwater Drive, the street right behind the property owned by the Episcopal Church Corporation - the property in question of being rezoned. The reason I'm sending you this e-mail is because I am in strong opposition to having that property rezoned from "RS-6" (Single Family Residential) to "ON" (Office Neighborhood). I have lived in this Country Club Estates neighborhood since 1980 (for the past 40 years), and I strongly object to seeing the dynamics of this neighborhood change by allowing office buildings to be built. My reasons for objecting to this rezoning request includes the following: - TRAFFIC: Office buildings bring people, and people bring traffic. There is a quiet little park where children run with their dogs, fly their kites and practice and play school sports (baseball, softball, soccer, football, etc) on Brisbane (the same street where the rezoning is being requested; in fact, this park is within the 200 ft radius, the same radius as the 28 houses that received the city's Public Hearing Notices). - PRIVACY: This office building, possibly multi-story, with houses bordering the perimeter of the property in question, would totally encroach on the privacy of the homes bordering this property. No amount of "buffer" property, along the fence-line of these homes, would be enough to assure the privacy that these homes presently have and, of course, had when the homeowners bought their houses. - LONG-TERM USE OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION: If rezoning of this property is successful, and the lawyers decide, at any time, that the demographics of this location is not good for law offices, nothing would prevent the owners from "renting" their facility to other establishments such as places that do "body art" (tatoos), chiropractors (places that do massages), or for that matter any other "business" that would not be conducive to the present "quietness" of this neighborhood. - PROPERTY VALUES OF THE 108 HOUSES IN THIS COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD - I've spoken with several realtor friends about this situation and they all said mostly the same thing - that having a "business" in a neighborhood makes the houses within that neighborhood harder to sell, and because of that, the expected selling price of these houses will usually have to be reduced (sometimes several times) in order to be sold. Also, for your information, I would like for you to know that there WAS a prospective buyer for that property who is a minister and who wanted to keep the existing building there and use it for his church. He contacted Ms Caroline Mowen (Cantor/Assistant Treasurer of the Episcopal Diocese of West Texas) to make an offer to buy the church property; I also told Mr Lundquist about this individual, but he didn't seem interested. After several attempts to make something happen there for his church, Pastor Terry eventually gave up. I thank you for your time and for your interest in helping us with this extremely sensitive situation. As a very concerned neighbor in this Country Club Estates neighborhood (one of the nicest older neighborhoods in this city) I ask that you DISAPPROVE rezoning of this property. Sincerely, GARY L RICHMER From:Reynaldo Narvaez To:Craig Garrison Subject:[EXTERNAL]Zoning Change Case 1220-03 Date:Monday, December 07, 2020 4:49:16 PM [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] My name is Reynaldo Narvaez and my wife is Josefa Narvaez. We reside at 4401 Congressional Dr and have lived at this same address since I retired from the Navy in May of 1993. We chose this neighborhood because it was and still is a nice, friendly, clean and quiet neighborhood to raise our family. My wife and I want to voice our objection to the proposed zoning change to the property at 4518 Saratoga case 1220-03. We are very concerned of any type of business even if they are just for offices being erected on this property. There are no business establishments Anywhere near our neighborhood and we prefer to keep it that way. We do not object to a church or single family residential homes. If we allow the zoning change what could come next, a zoning change at the Country Club Park just down the street from 4518 Saratoga on Brisbane Dr? We cannot allow this to happen. Thank you for this opportunity to voice our concerns and opinion. Please let our voices be heard. From:Heather Hallock To:Craig Garrison Cc:Catherine Garza Subject:Rezoning Case No 1220-03 Date:Monday, December 07, 2020 10:03:25 AM Attachments:Country Club Estates Unit 11 Deed.pdf [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] Dear Planning Commission, My husband Royce and I have lived in Country Club Estates for 29 out of our 37 years as Corpus Christi residents and we wanted to write and express our strong to the proposed rezoning case 1220-03 before you on Wednesday, Dec 9, 2020. At the time of its formation on Sep 7th, 1967 the deed for Country Club Estates required all lots to be used only for single family residential purposes with the exception of Lot 12 of Block 27 and Lot 10 of Block 49 which were specifically exempted as allowing church and related ecclesiastical purposes. After 30 years this deed and its restrictions renew every 10 years unless a majority of the owners change the restrictive covenants and file an amendment with the CountyClerk. To our knowledge (and that of City Staff) these restrictions have not been changed and the neighborhood deed is still in effect. We are concerned that the current city process is not respecting the deed or informing all 108 homes to which it applies as the character of a neighborhood such as ours is not measured by a simple 200 foot radius around the subject property. This deed is attached for your reference. The city’s approved Comprehensive Plan in section 3 states that one of its’ primary goals is that “Corpus Christi sustains and maintains established neighborhoods”. Our neighborhood has been established for 53 years and no agreement has ever been reached with a majority its 108 owners to change the intended use for this lot. The proposed rezoning is also not in alignment with the Southside Area Development plan land use map that was approved by our City Council as recently as March 17, 2020. Both of these misalignments are noted by staff on Page 1 and Page 3 of their report but a simple amendment is not appropriate as these documents were approved with intent to provide a consistent roadmap for decision making and planning in our city. Per Staff’s presentation, “ON” zoning would allow townhouse, apartments, offices, overnight accommodation, and accessory uses such as restaurants and retail sales. The rezoning being submitted is not dependent on an approved development plan and so your consideration for any rezoning needs to include all possible uses, not just the stated intended use of the owner/developer at this time. We recognize that their application references a 2-3 story office building but we find any use outside of Single Family residential out of keeping with the character (and legal deed) of the existing neighborhood. This poses real issues concerning privacy and an increase in noise and traffic for the surrounding homes and the adjacent city park. In summary and as you make your deliberations we would ask that you please consider carefully that this rezoning application it not in alignment with our City Comprehensive Plan, not in alignment with the Southside Area Development Plan, not in alignment with the deed and is definitely not in the best wishes of either us personally or our established neighborhood. Thank you for your time considering our opposition and your ongoing service to our community. Sincerely, Heather and Royce Hallock 6417 Swansea Dr. The Episcopal Church Corporation in West Texas Rezoning for a Property at 4518 Saratoga From “RS-6” to “ON” Zoning Case #1220-03 City Council March 16, 2021 2 Aerial Overview N 3 Adjacent Development and Zoning Pattern 4 Public Notification 28 Notices mailed inside 200’ buffer 8 Notices mailed outside 200’ buffer Notification Area Opposed: 20 (8.69%) In Favor: 9 (14.24 %) 0 XX X X XX Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition Separate Opposed Owners: 20 XX X 0000 XX 00 X XXX00 5 Recommendation Staff Recommendation: Approval of the change of zoning to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial of the change of zoning to the “ON” Office Neighborhood District 6 Setbacks DATE: February 15, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, AIA, Director Development Services Department AlRaymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3575 CAPTION: Zoning Case No. 1020-02, Mustang Island, LLC.: (District 4) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 7213 State Highway 361 from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District. SUMMARY: The purpose of the zoning request is to allow for the development a 90 guest room hotel having 4 stories and a total area of 64,160 square feet and allow for the construction of an RV Park north of the road entrance. The rezoning case was heard by City Council on December 8, 2020 and tabled to await artistic renderings of the proposed development. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The subject property is 17.034 acres in size. The subject property is currently zoned “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District and consists of vacant property and has remained undeveloped since annexation in 2001. Approximately, five acres will be for the development of the overnight accommodation (hotel) use. The remining twelve acres will be for the development of the proposed recreational vehicle park. Plans have not yet been submitted for the project. Conformity to City Policy The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang-Padre Island Area Development Plan and is planned for a Planned Development use. The proposed rezoning to the RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC), compatible with the adjoining properties, does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent properties, and is compatible with the Future Land Use map. The City encourages expanded and additional recreation vehicle areas to serve tourists. Rezoning of proposed resort commercial use east of State Highway 361 and in proximity to the gulf beach should be encouraged. This will be the only RV zoning district in the city portion outside of the state park between Park Road 22 and Port Aransas. Encouraging this zoning district will open up commercial, retail and other amenities that would stimulate tourism. The City encourages Rezoning a property at or near 7213 State Highway 361 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 03/16/21 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 03/23/21 expanded and additional hotel areas to serve tourists. Rezoning of proposed resort commercial use east of State Highway 361 and in proximity to the gulf beach should be encouraged. Public Input Process Number of Notices Mailed 41 within 200-foot notification area 5 outside notification area As of October 14, 2020: In Favor 0 inside notification area 0 outside notification area In Opposition 21 inside notification area 0 outside notification area Totaling 22.31% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District on October 14, 2020. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Denial of the change of zoning from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning request. Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District with following vote count. Vote Count: For: 9 Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 0 LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Zoning Case No. 1020-02, Mustang Island, LLC. (District 4). Ordinance rezoning property at or near 7213 State Highway 361 from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District. WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this rezoning is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this rezoning will promote the best and most orderly development of the properties affected thereby, and to be affected thereby, in the City of Corpus Christi. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described as being 4.999 acre tract being a portion of a 30.00 acre tract surveyed August 7, 2019 by Brister Surveying, said 30.00 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in File No. 2014040031, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas, and being out of the J. W. Waterbury Survey No. 596, Abstract 408, Land Script 167, Mustang Island, Nueces County, Texas as shown in Exhibit “A”: from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “CR-2” Resort Commercial District. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described as being and 12.035 acre tract being a portion of a 30.00 acre tract surveyed August 7, 2019 by Brister Surveying, said 30.00 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in File No. 2014040031, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas and being out of the J. W. Waterbury Survey No. 596, Abstract 408, Land Script 167, Mustang Island, Nueces County, Texas as shown in Exhibit “B”: from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District. Page 2 of 7 The subject property is located at or near 7213 State Highway 361. Exhibit A and B, which are the Metes and Bounds of the subject property with an associated map attached to and incorporated in this ordinance. SECTION 2. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011 and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect including the penalties for violations as made and provided for in Article 10 of the UDC. SECTION 3. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the subject property that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 5. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and/or Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Page 3 of 7 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez _______________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Page 4 of 7 Exhibit A Page 5 of 7 Page 6 of 7 Exhibit B Page 7 of 7 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 1020-02 INFOR No. 20ZN1023 Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 14, 2020 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: Mustang Island, LLC. Applicant: John Pietrobon Location Address: 7213 State Highway 361 Legal Description: Being 4.999 acre tract being a portion of a 30.00 acre tract surveyed August 7, 2019 by Brister Surveying, said 30.00 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in File No. 2014040031, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas, and being out of the J. W. Waterbury Survey No. 596, Abstract 408, Land Script 167, Mustang Island, Nueces county, Texas and 12.035 acre tract being a portion of a 30.00 acre tract surveyed August 7, 2019 by Brister Surveying, said 30.00 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in File No. 2014040031, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas and being out of the J. W. Waterbury Survey No. 596, Abstract 408, Land Script 167, Mustang Island, Nueces County, Texas 12.035 acre tract being a portion of a 30.00 acre tract surveyed August 7, 2019 by Brister Surveying, said 30.00 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in File No. 2014040031, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas, and being out of the J.W. Waterbury Survey No. 596, Abstract 408, Land Script 167, Mustang Island, Nueces County, Texas, located along the east side of State Highway 361, south of Beach View Drive, and north of La Concha Boulevard. Zoning Request From: “RM-AT” Multifamily AT To: “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park and “CR-2” Resort Commercial Area: 17.034 total acres Purpose of Request: To develop a 90 guest room hotel having 4 stories and a total area of 64,160 square feet and allow for the construction of an RV Park north of the road entrance. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site “RM-AT” Multifamily AT Vacant Planned Development North “RM-AT” Multifamily AT Vacant Planned Development South “RM-AT” Multifamily AT PUD Vacant and Low Density Residential Planned Development East “RM-AT” Multifamily AT Vacant Planned Development West “FR” Farm Rural Vacant Planned Development Staff Report Page 2 ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang-Padre Island Area Development Plan and is planned for a Planned Development use. The proposed rezoning to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park and “CR-2” Resort Commercial is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) and is consistent with the Future Land Use map. Map No.: 022037 City Council District: 4 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 700 feet of street frontage along State Highway 361 which is designated as a “RA3” Primary Rural Arterial Divided. Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume State Highway 361 “RA3” Primary Rural Arterial Divided 250’ ROW 76’ paved 120’ ROW 45’ paved 25,305 ADT (2015) SSStaff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District to allow for a 90 guest room hotel having 4 stories and a total area of 64,160 square feet and allow for the construction of an RV Park north of the road entrance. Development Plan: The subject property is a total of 17.034 acres in size. The proposed use is a 90 guest room hotel having 4 stories and a total area of 64,160 square feet with approximately 136 parking spaces and an RV Park to the north of the road entrance. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned “RM-AT” Multifamily AT and consists of vacant property and has remained undeveloped since annexation in 2001. To the north is a vacant property zoned “RM-AT” Multifamily AT. To the south are vacant properties zoned “RM-AT” Multifamily AT with one single family home. To the west across State Highway 361 is a vacant property zoned “FR” Farm Rural. To the east is a vacant properties zoned “RM-AT” Multifamily AT. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy’s Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The property is not platted. Utilities: Water: 12-inch ACP line located along State Highway 361 Wastewater: None Staff Report Page 3 Gas: None Storm Water: None Plan CC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang-Padre Island Area Development Plan and is planned for a Planned Development use. The proposed rezoning to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park and “CR-2” Resort Commercial is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) and is consistent with the Future Land Use map. The following policies should be considered: •Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). •Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). Department Comments: •The proposed rezoning is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC), compatible with the adjoining properties, does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent properties, and is compatible with the Future Land Use map. • 38TThe City encourages expanded and additional recreation vehicle areas to serve tourists. Rezoning of proposed resort commercial use east of 38TState Highway 36138T and in proximity to the gulf beach should be encouraged. This will be the only RV zoning district in the city portion outside of the state park between Park Road 22 and Port Aransas. Encouraging this zoning district will open up commercial, retail and other amenities that would stimulate tourism. 38TThe City encourages expanded and additional hotel areas to serve tourists. Rezoning of proposed resort commercial use east of 38TState Highway 36138T and in proximity to the gulf beach should be encouraged. U Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (October 14, 2020): Approval of the change of zoning from the “RM-AT” Multifamily AT District to the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District. Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed – 41 within 200-foot notification area 5 outside notification area UAs of October 14, 2020U: In Favor – 0 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area In Opposition – 21 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area Totaling 22.31% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) Staff Report Page 4 Staff Report Page 5 Staff Report Page 6 Mustang Island, LLC. Rezoning for a Property at 7213 State Highway 361 From “RM-AT” To “RV” and “CR-2” Zoning Case #1020-02 N City Council March 16, 2021 2 Aerial Overview 3 Adjacent Development 4 Zoning Pattern 5 Public Notification 41 Notices mailed inside 200’ buffer 5 Notices mailed outside 200’ buffer Notification Area Opposed: 21 (22.31%) In Favor: 0 X X X X XX X XXX X XXXX XX X X XX Separate Opposed Owners: 3 6 Approval of the “RV” Recreational Vehicle Park District and “CR-2” Resort Commercial District Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation Applicant’s Conceptual Plan: Island Beach Resort Existing Property PlannedResortLayout Retail -2 Floors with Gas Station Clubhouse Golf Cart Rental, Tennis Courts, Basketball Conceptual Renderings for RV Resort Conceptual Renderings for RV Resort Luxury Modern RV with outdoor living space Clubhouse ●Tennis courts ●Basketball courts ● ● ● ● Swimming pool Splashpad Playground Golf cart/ bicycles Rentals Hotel and Beachfront Condominium Luxury RV Resort Condominium Beachfront IPROJECTS AREA BUILDING COST ANNUAL REVENUE PROPERTY TAX RESORT HOTEL 60,000 sqft $14.5 Million $3.4 Million $290,000.00 Restaurant and Connection Hall 5,000 sqft Wet and Dry Sauna included Indoor Poolwith hottub included UPSCALE RV RESORT Approx 10Acres $5.2 Million $1.8 Million $104,000.00 Owner deeds and separate utilities. 1- Office andClub House 2 Employee Accomodations 3 Maintenance & Landscaping Facilty RETAIL 60,000 sqft tota l $15.2 Million 1.28 Million $334,000.00 Convenient store with gas station.1st floor 30,000 sqft 2ndfloor 30,000 sqft jTOTAL OF 3 PROJECTS $34.9 Million $6.48 Million Annual $738,000 Annual 17 UDC Requirements Buffer Yards: RM-AT to RV: N/A RM-AT to CR-2: Type A: 10’ & 5 pts Setbacks: Street: 20 feet Side: 0 feet Rear: 0 feet Parking: 1 per room (Hotel) Landscaping, Screening, and Lighting Standards Uses Allowed: Townhouse, Multifamily, Cottage Housing, Group Living, Medical, Park, and Overnight Accommodations. 18 Buffer Yards: RV to RM-AT: N/A RV to CR-2: Type A: 10’ & 5-points Rental Sites: Day or week only and no longer than 180 days in duration within the park. Accessory Uses: No more than 1/3 of park Barber shops, Beauty parlors, Car wash, Convenience grocery stores of less than 4,000 square feet, Day care centers, Dry cleaning receiving stations, Fuel sales, Restaurants excluding bars, taverns or pubs, and Self-service laundries UDC Requirements 19 Utilities Water: 12-inch ACP Wastewater: None Gas: None Storm Water: None DATE: February 15, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, AIA, Director Development Services Department AlRaymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3575 CAPTION: Zoning Case No. 0221-01, Adhub, LLC.: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market Road 2292) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District. SUMMARY: The proposed use will be a development consisting of a warehouse with office and a multi-acre improved storage-yard to store modular office structures. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The subject property is 30.77 acres in size. The subject property is currently zoned “RS-6” Single Family 6 District, consists of vacant property, and has remined undeveloped since annexation in 1962. The proposed zoning is inconsistent with Plan CC and the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ). The alternate recommendation supported by Planning Commission and staff of "IC" Industrial Compatible District allows the proposed use, a maximum of height of 35 feet and a screening fence/buffer while prohibiting uses that are inconsistent with the AICUZ. Conformity to City Policy The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan and is planned for a Agriculture or Rural Enterprise use. The proposed rezoning to the “IL” Light Industrial District is inconsistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC). However, the proposed use does not have a negative impact upon the adjacent properties. Although, the requested use of warehousing within the “IL” District is compatible in a one-to-one ratio with the FAR requirements in the “IC” District, there are many uses that are incompatible with the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) and Accident Potential Zone (APZ) Overlay. Incompatible uses include: Waste-Related Services, Truck stop with overnight accommodations, Fairgrounds, and a Vocational, trade or business school. By-products of some of these uses that are a priority to be aware of as listed in the Naval Air Station-Corpus Christi (NAS-CC) Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) are vibration, dust, smoke, steam, air quality, etc. The AICUZ Overlay over the subject property Rezoning a property at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 03/16/21 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting 03/23/21 has been established to protect the proposed runways that were included in the Corpus Christi International Airport Masterplan (adopted 2007). The property is designated as per the future land use as Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise. As per Plan CC, this land is intended to be used for single-family homes on very large lots or associated with rural enterprise uses, agricultural uses, vacant land that has not previously been developed, and small business clusters that serve a rural population. The subject property is in the path of the proposed runway. The proposed runway does not have a timeline for construction, and much of the land is still under private ownership. Public Input Process Number of Notices Mailed 12 within 200-foot notification area 6 outside notification area As of March 12, 2021: In Favor 0 inside notification area 0 outside notification area In Opposition 2 inside notification area 0 outside notification area Totaling 2.54% of the land within the 200-foot notification area in opposition. Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single- Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District, in lieu thereof, approval of the “IC/SP” Industrial Compatible District with a Special Permit (SP) with conditions on February 3, 2021. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approval of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District. (Requires ¾ vote to approve due to Planning Commission recommendation of denial) FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial in lieu of a Special Permit of the zoning request. Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single- Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District, in lieu thereof, approval of the “IC/SP” Industrial Compatible District with a Special Permit (SP) with conditions with following vote count. Vote Count: For: 7 Opposed: 1 Absent: 0 Abstained: 1 LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Case No. 0221-01, Adhub, LLC.: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market Road 2292) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this rezoning is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this rezoning will promote the best and most orderly development of the properties affected thereby, and to be affected thereby, in the City of Corpus Christi. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described as being a 30.77 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in Volume 1911, Page 207, Deed Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 30.77 acre tract being out of the Thomas Gallagher (400) Acre Survey, Patent No. 359, Volume 37, Abstract No. 988, and also being out of a portion of S ection 402, Beaty, Seale and Forwood Certificate No. 1739 as shown in Exhibit “A”: from the “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District. The subject property is located at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market Road 2292). Exhibit A, Exhibit A, which is the Metes and Bounds of the subject property with an associated map attached to and incorporated in this ordinance . SECTION 2. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011 and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect including the penalties for violations as made and provided for in Article 10 of the UDC. SECTION 3. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the Page 2 of 5 City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the subject property that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 5. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and/or Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Page 3 of 5 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its secon d reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez _______________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A Page 5 of 5 Case No. 0221-01, Adhub, LLC.: (District 3) Ordinance rezoning property at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market Road 2292) from the “RS-6” Single Family 6 District to the “IC/SP” Industrial Compatible District with a Special Permit WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to be heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this rezoning is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this rezoning will promote the best and most orderly development of the properties affected thereby, and to be affected thereby, in the City of Corpus Christi. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Unified Development Code (“UDC”) and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is amended by changing the zoning on the subject property described as being a 30.77 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in Volume 1911, Page 207, Deed Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 30.77 acre tract being out of the Thomas Gallagher (400) Acre Survey, Patent No. 359, Volume 37, Abstract No. 988, and also being out of a portion of Section 402, Beaty, Seale and Forwood Certificate No. 1739 as shown in Exhibit “A”: from the “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District to the “IC/SP” Industrial Compatible District with a Special Permit. The subject property is located at or near 502 South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market Road 2292). Exhibit A, Exhibit A, which is the Metes and Bounds of the subject property with an associated map attached to and incorporated in this ordinance . SECTION 2. The Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this ordinance is subject to the Owner following the conditions listed below: 1. Height: The maximum height of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. Stacking containers shall not exceed three containers high. Page 2 of 5 2. Buffer Yard: The required buffer yard along the southern property line shall be 30 - feet in width and must include a solid screening fence at least 8-feet in height along the property line. 3. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Prior to obtaining building permits or beginning any construction, a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (Form 7460) shall be submitted and a determination rendered by the FAA of no hazard to air navigation and/or flight operations to/from the Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) regarding any construction at the site or temporary structures such as construction cranes on site. 4. Time Limit: In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and/or the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011 and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect including the penalties for violations as made and provided for in Article 10 of the UDC. SECTION 4. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the subject property that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and/or Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. This ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Page 3 of 5 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez _______________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A Page 5 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0221-01 INFOR No. Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2021 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: Adhub, LLC Applicant: Valls Holdings, Ltd. Location Address: 502 South Clarkwood Road Legal Description: 502 South Clarkwood Road and described as being a 30.77 acre tract as in a deed recorded in Volume 1911, page 207, Deed Records Nueces County, Texas, said 30.77 acre tract being out of the Thomas Gallagher (400) Acre Survey, Patent No. 359, Volume 37, Abstract No. 988, and also being out of a portion of Section 402, Beaty, Seale and Forwood Certificate No. 1739, and located along the east side of South Clarkwood Road (Farm to Market 2292), south of State Highway 44 (SH 44), north of County Road 34, and west of South Blockholt Road. Zoning Request From: “RS-6” Single-Family District 6 District To: “IL” Light Industrial District Area: 30.77 acres Purpose of Request: The owner of the property is requesting a change of zoning from RS-6 to IL. Proposed use will be a development consisting of a warehouse with office and a multi-acre improved storage-yard to store modular office structures. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site “RS-6” Single-Family District 6 District Vacant Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise North “RS-6” Single-Family District 6 District Vacant Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise and Medium Density Residential South “RV” Recreational Vehicle Vacant Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise and Flood Plain Conservation East “RS-6” Single-Family District 6 District Drainage Corridor Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise and Permanent Open Space/ Light Industrial, Commercial West “RS-4.5” Single-Family District 6 District Vacant/ Public/Semi- Public Transportation Staff Report Page 2 Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District to allow for the construction of a warehouse and outdoor storage of modular offices. Development Plan: The subject property is 30.77 acres. The proposed development of a warehouse and outdoor storage yard will have access to South Clarkwood Road. The business will have a limited staff. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned “RS-6” Single Family Residential District consists of vacant property and has remined undeveloped since annexation in 1962 and 1981. To the north are a few single-family residential homes zoned “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District, and two vacant properties zoned “IC” Industrial Compatible District/ “IL/SP” Light Industrial District with a Special Permit. To the south is vacant property zoned “RV” Recreation Vehicle. To the west is South Clarkwood Road and the city limit ends on the west side of the South Clarkwood Road right of way. To the west is vacant land and a drainage corridor zoned “FR” Farm Rural District and “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District. AICUZ: The subject property is located in one of the Navy’s Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Navy Land Use Compatibility in Accident Potential Zones (APZs): As part of the Naval Air Station-Corpus Christi (NAS-CC’s) Joint Land Use Study (JLUS), AICUZs has been identified for proposed CCIA runway, and the subject property is in both the APZ-I and APZ-II. ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan and is planned for Agriculture or Rural Enterprise uses. The proposed rezoning to the “IL” Light Industrial District is inconsistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map. Map No.:058042, 058043, 057043, and 057042 City Council District: 3 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 1,100 feet of street frontage along South Clarkwood Road which is designated as a “A3” Primary Arterial Street. According to the Urban Transportation Plan (Urban Transportation Plan), Primary Arterial can convey a capacity of 30,000 – 48,000 average daily trips. The proposed development of warehousing and an outdoor storage yard will have access to South Clarkwood Road. Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume South Clarkwood Road “A3” Primary Arterial 130’ ROW 79’ paved 112’ ROW 25’ paved 799 (2019) Staff Report Page 3 As part of the NAS-CC’s JLUS, the City created two new zoning districts to increase land use compatibility around the runways. Those districts are the “IC” Industrial Compatible District and the “CC” Commercial Compatible District. These new districts were intended for properties within an AICUZ. An ideal zoning district for this use is the “IC” district. The proposed use of warehousing is allowed a Maximum Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.00. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) - Determinations of Hazards The applicant is required to request a determination of hazards from the FAA for each structure constructed on the subject property. Plat Status: The property is not platted. Utilities: Water: 12-inch ACP line along the property on the west. A 48-inch CSCP line runs through the property. Wastewater: 10-inch VCP line along to the north. Gas: 4-inch gas line located along the property on the west. Storm Water: 43-inch line across South Clarkwood Road to the north. Stormwater drainage ditches are available to the north and east. Plan CC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan (Adopted 2001) and is planned for Agriculture or Rural Enterprise uses. The proposed rezoning to the “IL” Light Industrial District is inconsistent with the adopted Northwest Area Development Plan. The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC) (Adopted 2016). The following policies should be considered: • Protect the Corpus Christi International Airport by discouraging heavy industrial uses from locating under flight approach zones. The primary airport approach flight path is located over the Annaville/Calallan areas in a southeast-northwest direction. The plan recommends residential and light industrial uses in these underlying areas. (Northwest Area Development Plan, Land Use Policy Statement (h)) • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan (Plan CC). The proposed rezoning is also incompatible with the future land use and but does not have seem to have a direct negative impact upon the adjacent properties. • Although the requested use of Warehousing within the “IL” District is compatible in a one to one ratio with the FAR requirements in the “IC” District, there are many uses that are incompatible with the AICUZ Overlay. Incompatible uses include: Waste-Related Services, Truck stop with overnight accommodations, Fairgrounds, and a Vocational, trade or business school. By-products of some of these uses that are a priority to be aware of as listed in the NAS-CC JLUS are vibration, dust, smoke, steam, air quality, etc. Staff Report Page 4 • The AICUZ Overlay over the subject property has been established to protect the proposed runways that were included in the Corpus Christi International Airport Masterplan (adopted 2007). • The subject property is suitable for the uses proposed by this rezoning. • The property is designated as per the future land use as Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise. As per Plan CC, this land is intended to be used for single-family homes on very large lots or associated with rural enterprise uses, agricultural uses, vacant land that has not previously been developed, and small business clusters that serve a rural population. • The subject property is in the path of ta proposed runway. The proposed runway does not have a timeline for construction, and much of the land is still under private ownership. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (February 3, 2021): Denial of the change of zoning from the “RS-6” Single-Family 6 District to the “IL” Light Industrial District, in lieu thereof, approval of the “IC/SP” Industrial Compatible District with a Special Permit (SP) with the following conditions. 1. Height: The maximum height of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. Stacking containers shall not exceed three containers high. 2. Buffer Yard: The required buffer yard along the southern property line shall be 30-feet in width and must include a solid screening fence at least 8-feet in height along the property line. 3. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Prior to obtaining building permits or beginning any construction, a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (Form 7460) shall be submitted, and a determination rendered by the FAA of no hazard to air navigation and/or flight operations to/from the Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) regarding any construction at the site or temporary structures such as construction cranes on site. 4. Time Limit: In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and/or the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. Staff Report Page 5 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed – 12 within 200-foot notification area 6 outside notification area As of January 24, 2020: In Favor – 0 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area In Opposition – 2 inside notification area – 0 outside notification area Totaling 2.54% of the land within the 200-foot notification area* in opposition. *Created by calculating the area of land immediately adjoining the subject property and extending 200-foot therefrom. The opposition is totaled by the total area of land that each individual property owner owns converted into a percentage of the total 200-foot notification area. Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition Attachments: A. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) B. Public Comments Received (if any) Staff Report Page 6 Staff Report Page 7 Staff Report Page 8 Adhub, LLC Rezoning for a Property at 502 South Clarkwood Road From “RS-6” to “IL” Zoning Case #0221-01 City Council March 16, 2021 2 Aerial Overview N 3 Zoning Pattern N 4 Air Installation Compatibility Use Zone N 5 Public Notification 12 Notices mailed inside 200’ buffer 6 Notices mailed outside 200’ buffer Notification Area Opposed: 2 (2.54%) In Favor: 0 (0.00 %) XX Separate Opposed Owners: 2 Notified property owner’s land in square feet / Total square footage of all property in the notification area = Percentage of public opposition 6 Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation Denial of the change of zoning to the “IL” Light Industrial District and lieu thereof Approval of the change of zoning to the “IC” Industrial Compatible District w/ a Special Permit 7 Proposed Special Permit Special Permit Requirements: 1.Height: The maximum height of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. Stacking containers shall not exceed three containers high. 2.Buffer Yard: The required buffer yard along the southern property line shall be 30-feet in width and must include a solid screening fence at least 8-feet in height along the property line. 3.Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Prior to obtaining building permits or beginning any construction, a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (Form 7460) shall be submitted and a determination rendered by the FAA of no hazard to air navigation and/or flight operations to/from the Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) regarding any construction at the site or temporary structures such as construction cranes on site. 4.Time Limit: In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and/or the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. 8 Buffer Yards: “IL” to “RV” Type C: 15-points, 15-feet wide Setbacks: Street: 20 feet Side: 40 feet adjacent to any residential Rear: 40 feet adjacent to any residential use UDC Requirements: 1:2 Slope Building Setback Height Uses Allowed: Warehouse and Freight Movement, Wholesale Trade Uses, Waste-Related Services, Commercial Parking, Restaurant Uses, etc. UDC Requirements N 9 Utilities Water:12-inch ACP line along the property on the west. A 48- inch CSCP line runs through the property. Wastewater:10-inch VCP line along to the north of the property. Gas:4-inch gas line located along the property on the west. Storm Water:43-inch line across South Clarkwood Road to the north. Stormwater drainage ditches are available to the north and east. N 10 Existing Land Use Future Land Use Vacant Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Park Commercial Government Flood Plain ConservationPublic/Semi-Public Commercial Land Use N Agriculture/ Rural Enterprise Light Industrial DATE: February 21, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, AICP, Director of Planning & ESI DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-7011 CAPTION: Ordinance adopting the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan as an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARY: The Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan is an element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, designed to provide guidance and direction for future development and public investments in the study area. The purpose of this planning effort was to identify strategies for improving the safety of the corridor for all users (motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, transit riders, and those with limited mobility), improving the attractiveness of the corridor, and fostering a thriving economic climate. As one of the City Manager’s FY 19/20 Budget Initiatives, this project represents the City’s effort to proactively plan for safe, orderly and attractive growth consistent with the community’s vision. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City of Corpus Christi worked with urban planning consultants from Asakura Robinson to create the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan to identify opportunities to improve Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) in the Calallen Area and guide future development. The plan includes:  A community-based vision statement and goals.  Strategies and actions to achieve the vision and goals including conceptual drawings and examples of suggested improvements.  An Implementation Plan summarizing the strategies and actions including time frames, rough cost estimates, potential funding sources, and responsible parties.  An appendix containing the Assessment of Opportunities Report and summaries of surveys and meetings. Community input was used to create the plan. An Advisory Committee was formed, and the committee met three times. Two online public meetings were held. Two online public surveys were conducted – a Vision Survey and a Concepts Survey. Several individual stakeholders were AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of March 23, 2021 Public Hearing on the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan consulted. Several community priorities emerged from the public process and are summarized as follows:  Reduce traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard.  Preserve and enhance the business and commercial space.  Enhance beauty and landscaping in the area.  Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety. The project team used the results of community input to develop the following vision statement and goals, which were reviewed with the public during the second phase of public engagement and refined for the final draft plan. The Vision: “Northwest Boulevard is Calallen’s “Main Street,” providing the amenities of a prosperous neighborhood center in a small, tight-knit community. The Boulevard is a welcoming, diverse, and family-friendly place where people go to shop, gather, invest in businesses, play and raise a family.” The Goals: “Northwest Boulevard’s future is: 1) Safe, accessible, and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. 2) Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses. 3) Healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. 4) Attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole.” For each goal above, the plan identifies six to nine strategies and actions the City and community partners could complete to achieve the goals. ALTERNATIVES: The planning process, in general, involves the analysis of alternatives that are reviewed with the community. The plan being presented represents the selection of the best alternatives for improving the corridor. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of the plan itself does not have a financial impact. While the plan provides approximations of the cost of potential improvements, City staff and Council would review and approve future actions with financial obligations needed to implement this plan. Funding Detail: Fund: N/A Organization/Activity: N/A Mission Element: N/A Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan. Planning Commission recommends approval with conditions:  Amend the document to address the implementation of additional street lighting.  Amend the document to emphasize the implementation of new/future city utilities; (Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water). Transportation Advisory Commission recommends approval. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan – Final Report (Jan. 2021) Ordinance PowerPoint Ordinance adopting the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan as an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the adoption of the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to give testimony and present written evidence; WHEREAS, City Staff invited the public to workshops and public meetings to give input to help develop a Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan for Corpus Christi, and to receive public feedback; WHEREAS, the City shall use the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan as a guideline for urban growth, implementation of policy initiatives and public investments, and to facilitate other plans that the city considers necessary for systematic growth and development; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that these amendments would best serve public health, safety, necessity, convenience, and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan is adopted as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by reference. SECTION 2. That the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan adopted by City Council ordinance #030978 on September 27, 2016 is hereby amended to include the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan as an element. SECTION 4. To the extent that the amendment made by this ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the amendment made by this ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time and except as changed by this ordinance, remains in full force and effect. SECTION 5. The City Council intends that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof shall be given full force and effect for its purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, that judgment shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance. SECTION 6. This ordinance takes effect after final passage on second reading. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Exhibit A City of Corpus ChristiNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan Draft Report Submitted January 2021 Acknowledgements City Council Mayor Paulette M Guajardo Michael Hunter John Martinez Mike Pusley Billy Lerma Ben Molina Roland Berrera Greg Smith Gil Hernandez Planning Commission Sheldon Schroeder Kamran Zarghouni Michael M Miller Michael York Daniel M Dibble Jeremy Baugh Brian S Mandel Javier O Gonzalez Cynthia S Garza Benjamin Polak, Ex Officio City Staff Steve Viera, Assistant City Manager Peter Zanoni, City Manager Annika Gunning Yankee, Sr. Planner/Project Manager Daniel McGinn, AICP, Director Avery Oltmans, AICP, City Planner Advisory Committee Dr. Arturo Almendarez, Calallen Independent School District Judy Telge, Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living Rose Fernandez, Calallen Apartments Thomas Tiffin, P..E., Wood River Community Association Charles Benavides, P.E., Texas Department of Transportation Craig Casper, AICP, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Gordon Robinson, AICP, Regional Transportation Authority Jack Taylor, Northwest Business Association Mike Pusley, Northwest Business Association Yasmene McDaniel, Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest Angela Rhoden, Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest Juan Pimentel, P.E., Nueces County Public Works Carolyn Vaughn, Nueces County Commissioner Everett Roy, City Councilmember Sarah Munoz, P.E., City of Corpus Christi Public WorksAsakura Robinson Matt Rufo, AICP | Project Manager Zakcq Lockrem, AICP | Principal-in-Charge Brianna Frey, AICP | Deputy Project Manager Hugo ColÓn, Associate AIA | Lead Designer Contents Introduction .....................................................2 Why a Corridor Plan? ....................................................................2 A Public Process .............................................................................3 Vision and Goals ..............................................6 Strategies and Actions .....................................9 Overview ...........................................................................................9 Transportation ..............................................................................14 Land Use, Zoning and Business ................................................22 Streetscape....................................................................................28 Implementation .............................................39 Overview .........................................................................................39 Implementation Matrix ................................................................40 Funding the Plan ...........................................................................45 Appendix .......................................................47 Engagement Summary and Documentation ..........................47 Assessment of Opportunities ....................................................47 2 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 January 2021 January 2021 INTRODUCTION Why a Corridor Plan? Thanks in part to a surge of industrial development in the Corpus Christi metropolitan area in recent years, the Calallen area of far-northwest Corpus Christi has experienced new development. From oil refining and transportation to steel production, the expansion in these export industries is bringing wealth and job opportunities to the region. With this investment comes development pressure and demand grows for new homes, retailers and services. The City of Corpus Christi anticipates additional residential and commercial development, as well as a new elementary school, in the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor. Plans to build a new steel factory in Sinton could drive additional demand for new housing and commerce in Calallen. While new development creates new opportunities for people to live, work and do business in Calallen, it also brings new challenges, such as more auto traffic, and more demands on critical infrastructure. The Northwest Boulevard (FM624) Corridor Plan represents the City of Corpus Christi’s effort to proactively plan for orderly, attractive and sustainable growth and development consistent with the community’s vision. A Public Process Meaningful public engagement has been essential to the development of this Plan’s vision and priorities, and the Plan successfully shifted in person engagement online when COVID-19 presented itself in March 2020. Throughout the three-phase planning process - in which the project consulting team first gathered data, facilitated visioning, and refined strategies for implementation - the City of Corpus Christi provided multiple opportunities for the public to express their ideas, hopes, and concerns through numerous channels. These included: • Two online surveys received a combined 590 responses • One online mapping tool to identify issues and assets • Two virtual public meetings • Three Advisory Committee meetings • Multiple social media announcements of surveys and public meetings • Multiple e-newsletter mailings through City of Corpus Christi listservs • Poster advertisements at bus stops within the study area Throughout the planning process, the City and consultants engaged and interviewed numerous Corridor stakeholders, from TxDOT and Calallen High School leadership to developers and land owners. The City also convened an Advisory Committee composed of public agency partners, local business and neighborhood association representatives, and major employers to advise the City staff and consultants on development of the Plan’s strategies and specific recommendations. The Northwest Boulevard Corridor lies 20 miles upriver from downtown Corpus Christi. The study area comprises a 500-foot buffer to the north and to the south from Interstate 69 to Wright Moravek Road (County Road 73) - nearly three miles. The Nueces River bounds adjacent neighborhoods to the north, while Interstate 69 presents a physical barrier to the east. To the west and south, development quickly transitions from suburban to rural conditions. The Wood River neighborhood is north of the corridor, and major anchors include one preschool, two elementary schools, one high school, River Hills Country Club, Hazel Bazemore Park, Corpus Christi Medical Center, and retail destinations including Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center. 2020 March April May June July August Phase 1: Understand 1 Phase 2: Envision 2 1 Phase 3: Act 3 2 Advisory Committee Meeting Public Input Meeting Through compilation of the ideas, aspirations, and concerns collected, several priorities emerged: Reduce traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard Participants repeatedly stressed the importance that the roads should be more convenient for drivers, particularly by mitigating traffic congestion and improving roadway safety. Preserve and enhance the business and commercial space Participants especially desired more grocery shopping and dining options, especially family-friendly establishments. Many asked for access to businesses to be maintained, and that they want commercial development to continue to front Northwest Boulevard. Enhance beauty and landscaping in the area Respondents desire to improve area aesthetics with proper landscape maintenance. Many desire easy-to- maintain plantings, consistent sign regulations, and to overall improve the attractiveness to visitors. Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety Participants agree the study area’s roads should be safer, more accessible, and convenient for bicyclists and pedestrians. Many observed pedestrians walking along Northwest Boulevard without sidewalks. 2 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 January 2021 January 2021 4 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 5 January 2021 January 2021 0 500 1,000 2,000 ftSource: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019; City of Corpus Christi GIS Services; TXDOT Zoning of Vacant Land Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Farm-Rural Multi-family Single-family Study Area boundary City boundary Existing Land Use High-density residential Low-density residential Estate residential Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Public/Semi-Public Water Planned Developments 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 89 Figure 1: Study Area Existing Land Uses and Planned Developments Northwest BlvdE Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D rRiver Hill DrWood River DrMagee Elementary School Calallen High School Wood River Elementary School Hazel Bazemore Park Northwest Park River Hills Country Club Key Proposed/Planned Use Zoning Future Land Use Designation (PlanCC)Plat Status 1 River Ridge Unit 4 RS-6 Single-Family 6 Medium-density residential (4 to 13 units/ acre)Under review 2 Calallen Elementary School RS-6 Single-Family 6 Medium-density Residential (4-13 units/acre)Recorded 3 Office/Neighborhood retail CN-2 Neighborhood Commercial Commercial Pending 4 Urgent care clinic CG-2 General Commercial Mixed Use Recorded 5 Office building CG-2 General Commercial Mixed Use 6 Grocery, neighborhood retail, residential CG-2 General Commercial Mixed Use Recorded 7 “The Lakes at Northwest” 71 single-family homes RS-6 Single-Family 6 Medium-density Residential (4-13 units/acre)Construction 8 West River Place Unit 2 CG-2 General Commercial Medium-density Residential (4-13 units/acre)Approved 9 Mesquiteville restaurant CG-2 General Commercial Commercial Construction 6 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 January 2021 January 2021 VISION Northwest Boulevard's Future Is: 2) Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses »A variety of neighborhood restaurants and retail outlets offer a diverse array of goods, services, and family-friendly experiences »Businesses can receive support and incentives from public entities to recover from loss of income 3) Healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. »Trees and vegetation provide shade and help drain stormwater »Trails are easily accessible for walking, hiking and biking 4) Attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole »Public infrastructure is expanded to areas planned for development »Public art and neighborhood branding convey a sense of place and beautify the public realm »Wayfinding signage draws attention to neighborhood attractions and guides visitors »Regulation of commercial signage ensures a consistent, physical appearance along the Boulevard 1) Safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. »Congestion is less frequent, making it easier for people to get around and navigate the neighborhood »Traffic is calmed, making it safer for people to drive, walk across, and bike along the boulevard »Streets and sidewalks are accessible, and built to ADA standards “Business growth and a diverse population that reside there have made the areas around Northwest Blvd a true melting pot with its own unique sense of pride and character." "This area is the future of Corpus Christi and is the first impression for tourists and visitors coming here. Make it more attractive and accessible so they want to return.” - Survey Respondants Hazel Bazemore Park. Source: Flickr user birdybirdbits Northwest Boulevard is Calallen’s “Main Street,” providing the amenities of a prosperous neighborhood center in a small, tight-knit community. The Boulevard is a welcoming, diverse, and family-friendly place where people go to shop, gather, invest in businesses, play and raise a family. Calallen Cats. Source: Callalen ISD National Walk and Bike to School Day. Source: pexels.com Trails for walking, hiking, and biking. Source: Corpus Christi CVB Live, work and play. Source: The Char Atnip Team Mike Cotton's BBQ. Source: Gerald McLeod 6 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 January 2021 January 2021 GOALS STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS Overview The Corridor Plan’s four goals and individual strategies and actions aim to fulfill the Vision by: »Identifying major capital and infrastructure projects along with smaller, incremental program or policy changes. »Leveraging public-sector actions to encourage private sector responses. »Encouraging new development in underutilized areas, while avoiding negative impacts on existing neighborhoods and institutions. Goal 1: Safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. Goal 3: Healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. Goal 2: Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses Goal 4: Attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole Land Use, Zoning, a n d B u s i nessTransportationS t r e e t s cape Strategies and Actions Goals Transportation 1 2 3 4 T1. Reduce congestion at I-69  T2. Improve intersections for safety and mobility  T3. Build active infrastructure along roadways  T4. Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand  Land Use, Zoning and Business 1 2 3 4 L1. Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment  L2. Relax zoning and other city restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID-19  L3. Provide small businesses programs that target long-term impacts of COVID-19  Streetscape 1 2 3 4 S1. Reduce lane widths  S2. Enhance planting areas  S3. Expand and plant medians  S4. Design and install signage and banners  S5: Install Public Art  10 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 11 January 202110 11 January 2021 Intersection Enhancements A FM 1889 - Ped. countdown signals, crosswalks, curb extensions, ped. refuge island B CR 69 - Ped. countdown signals, raised crosswalk, curb extensions, ped. refuge island C Wildcat Drive - Ped. countdown signals, raised crosswalk, curb extensions, ped. refuge island D US Hwy 77 - Ped. countdown signals; high-visibility crosswalks; ped. refuge island. Traffic Circulation Partnerships E Grocery and Neighborhood retail F Calallen Elementary and High School Concept Map Many of the strategies and actions focus on specific locations within the Corridor. The map below indicates these locations and organizes them by goal. Many other strategies and actions apply more broadly to the Corridor overall, and do not appear in this map. The strategy descriptions in the following pages and the Implementation Matrix on page 44 offer additional details about these. Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrE A Es 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Calallen Elementary School B F DC s u u R S Figure 2: Overall Concept Map Active Transportation Enhancements Off-road shared use trails are wide, raised, behind-the-curb paths that provide space for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel in both directions along the path. Buffered bike lanes are on-street bike lanes with a physical buffer, which may be marked with pavement paint or incorporated vertical elements such as posted bollards, between automobiles and bicyclists. Bike boulevards are on-street bikeways in which bicyclists share space with automobiles on low speed and low trafficked streets. Study area Parks and open space Water City Boundary Proposed Future Land Use High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Public Art Opportunity Gateway Public Art Art Attraction u Crosswalk Art S Mural Art Opportunity s SuR 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft 12 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 13 January 202112 13 January 2021 Elements of a Safe, Accessible, and Attractive Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard's wide right-of-way provides ample room for building roadway design elements that improve safety and accessibility for people driving, walking and biking on Calallen’s “Main Street.” The diagram below illustrates how many such features, which are described in detail in the following pages, work together to create a comprehensive, “complete street” that meets the needs of businesses, residents, institutions, and commuters. 2 4 8 5 6 7 3 9 1 High Visibility Crosswalks Pedestrian Countdown Signals Pedestrian Refuge Island Sidepath Landscaped Median Reduced lane widths Shade Trees and planting area Pedestrian Lighting and Street Banners Curb extensions on cross streets Figure 3: Proposed, Model Design for Northwest Boulevard 14 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 15 January 202114 15 January 2021 Transportation Strategies T1: Reduce congestion at I-69 Goals: Problem: Reducing congestion along Northwest Boulevard, particularly between Calallen High School and the IH-69 interchange, emerged as the clear top priority among participants in the planning process; 47% of all survey respondents cited traffic flow and congestion as “the one improvement you’d like to see in the Study Area,” and an additional 6% cited traffic light challenges specifically. 80% “strongly agreed” that “roads should be more convenient for auto traffic with less congestion.” People noted that long back-ups accessing the interstate on-ramps form during morning and afternoon peak periods associated with school opening and dismissal times. Solution Several options are available to reduce congestion at the historic “Five Points” intersection of IH-69, Northwest Boulevard, and Leopard Street: reducing traffic demand, expanding interstate throughput capacity, and expanding surface street throughput capacity. The first option has already occurred to the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased working-from-home and virtual learning. However, long-term success for the corridor relies on students returning to classrooms and shoppers returning to businesses. TXDOT is currently studying opportunities to improve traffic flow and entrance and exit movements on IH-69, which could reduce vehicles queuing on surface roads to access the interstate. In the Single-point urban interchange (SPUI), Phoenix, AZ. Source: Google Maps FM624/I-69 Interchange. Source: Google Maps 51st Street Roundabout, Austin. Source: ASCE Texas Roundabout. Source: Mobility CC short term, the City can work with TXDOT to redesign and rebuild the Five Points intersection to more efficiently move traffic. Encouraging greater use of recently improved County Road 52 could reduce demand during peak hours, particularly for traffic heading south. Effective diversion of traffic would eventually increase. A Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) received broad support from survey respondents as a potential innovative solution. A SPUI condenses two signalized intersections into a single intersection with one set of traffic signals, improving efficiency and traffic flow. These are called “urban” because they consume much less right-of-way than other interchange types, such as cloverleafs. Multilane Roundabouts – unsignalized, circular intersections, offer a second alternative to the existing intersection design. Traffic travels in the same direction around a central median in two ore more lanes to accommodate exits from the outer lane. Advantages include the elimination of left-hand turns, which are frequent causes of vehicular crashes ; reduced idling during non-peak hours; and traffic calming. However, the drawbacks make roundabouts less viable than a SPUI – they consume much more right-of-way and can be prohibitive for truck traffic. Numerous public comments also suggested that motorists would not understand how multilane roundabouts work, and that the new design could cause crashes. Regardless of the specific design intervention, the City of Corpus Christi in the short-term should work with TXDOT and the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to study alternatives to the existing intersection design and function, identify a preferred design, and allocate funding for design and construction. 1 2 3 4  16 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 17 January 202116 17 January 2021 T2: Improve intersections for safety and mobility Goals: Problem Between 2018 and 2019, 272 crashes, resulting in 3 deaths, 4 suspected serious injuries, 12 crashes with non- incapacitating injuries, and 60 crashes involving possible injury occurred in the corridor. Three fatal collisions in the corridor between 2018 and 2019 resulted in the death of one cyclist and two pedestrians. Intersections are frequent locations for traffic crashes. Every pedestrian- vehicle collision occurred near an intersection (River Trail Drive, FM 1889, and Interstate 69E). Numerous survey respondents warned of the need to calm high- speed traffic, particularly at intersections where existing shoulders allow motorists to make turns at high speeds. Solution Reducing speed and improving visibility at intersections are proven methods for making roadways safer. Numerous intersection design interventions can effectively calm through-traffic and turning traffic, Raised, high-visibility crosswalk in Appleton, WI. Source: Fox11 News/City of Appleton Raised, high-visibility crosswalk. Source: Appleton Department of Public Works Pedestrian countdown signal. Source: Maricopa Association of Governments Pedestrian refuge island Source: NACTO including high-visibility crosswalks, raised crosswalks, curb extensions (also known as “bump-outs”), pedestrian countdown signals, and roundabout treatments. The concept map on pages 10-11 shows locations for recommended priority intersections for these types of traffic calming measures: IH-69 Numerous crashes have occured at this major intersection in recent years. The costs are measured not just in human injuries and property damage but also increased traffic congestion and use of emergency response resources. • Recommendation: Pedestrian countdown signals; High-visibility crosswalk markings; Pedestrian refuge island. County Road 69 One mile west of IH-69, this signalized intersection is the next north-south road to extend to County Road 52 and points southward, and therefore is an important alternative route for westbound and eastbound traffic. Northward, it serves Hazel Bazemore County Park and the future Calallen Elementary School. • Recommendation: Pedestrian countdown signals; High-visibility crosswalk markings; Raised crosswalks; Curb extensions; Pedestrian refuge island. Farm-to-Market Road 1889 FM1889 is the next road to the west of CR69 to provide a southern connection to CR52. The H-E-B grocery company (landowner) has installed infrastructure at the large, currently undeveloped parcel to the southeast, and neighborhood retail and new housing are also planned for the vicinity. • Recommendation: Pedestrian countdown signals; High-visibility crosswalk markings; Raised crosswalks; Curb extensions; Pedestrian refuge island. River Trail Drive, Riverview Drive, and East Riverview Street These three roads serve the low-density residences outside city limits to the north of Northwest Boulevard between FM 1889 and County Road 73. They are each two lane roads and their intersections with Northwest Boulevard are unsignalized. Public feedback indicated unsafe conditions making left turns from the roads onto Northwest Boulevard eastbound. A fatal pedestrian collision also occurred at this part of the corridor in recent years. • Recommendation: Roundabout or signal timed to prioritize east-west traffic . Curb bump-out. Source: NACTO 1 2 3 4  18 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 19 January 202118 19 January 2021 Figure 4: Summary of Right-of-Way Change Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft ACB 100%80%60%40%20%0%Street Sections% of Right of Way C B A Study area Automobile Median Sidewalk/Shared Use Path Planting Zone Shoulder Buffer Northwest Boulevard at I-69 Northwest Boulevard at Riverside Boulevard Northwest Boulevard at River Hill Drive T3: Build active infrastructure along roadways Goals: Problem 75% of Visioning Survey respondents “Strongly Agree” (53%) or “Somewhat agree” (22%) that “Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be safer and more accessible and convenient for people to walk or bike along (such as by adding sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian signals).” Recent crashes involving people riding bikes could have possibly been avoided if safer facilities were in place to accommodate them. Solution Wide sidewalks and bikeways separated from vehicular traffic are safer and more comfortable than the existing roadway facilities, which consist of wide shoulders west of Calallen High School, and narrow sidewalks immediately adjacent to traffic lanes east of the high school. The City's adopted Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility (an amendment to MobilityCC) provides guidance for these types of facilities. Sidepaths are essentially wide (at least 10’) sidewalks that permit shared use by people walking or bicycling. These are recommended the entire length of the north side of Northwest Boulevard within the study area, and on the south side of Northwest Boulevard from FM1889 to IH-69. On-street bike lanes separated by a two-foot pavement marking – known as buffered bike lanes – are recommended for less travelled north-south collector roadways, including County Road 69, Riverview Drive, River Hill Drive, and Wood River Drive. Shared lane markings (“sharrows”) are appropriate on local, low- volume, low-speed streets that are nonetheless important connectors between destinations, sidepaths and buffered bikeways. The City may pair installation of sharrows with wayfinding and regulatory signage reminding motorists that “Bicycles May Use Full Lane” (MUTCD Section 9B.06). The Concept Map on pages 10-11 illustrates recommended locations for installing each of these facilities. Sidepath. Source: City's Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility Shared lane markings. Source: Corpus Christi Caller Times Buffered bike lane. Source: League of American Bicyclists 1 2 3 4  Existing Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Proposed 20 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 21 January 202120 21 January 2021 Walking School Bus. Source: New Dream blog Consider one-way routing of drop-off and pick-up traffic Westbound right-turn-only lane: Change to through lane OR add more signage/warning that lane ends Potential roundabout to calm traffic at Wildcat Drive Wildcat DriveNorthwest Blvd Walking/bicycling paths on both sides of Northwest Boulevard connect to residential neighborhoods T4: Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand Goals 1 2 3 4  Traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard tends to peak during school opening and dismissal times. Closer coordination between the City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT and Calallen ISD can help manage the flow of this traffic and reduce the number of vehicles travelling to and from campuses. This coordination began during the corridor planning process and resulted in short-term actions: • The City, ISD, and TXDOT will review signal timing at Wildcat Drive and River East Drive for the opportunity to prioritize predominant traffic movements during peak morning and afternoon periods - particularly during the 4pm rush hour. • TXDOT is working with Callen ISD to produce a traffic management plan designed for special events - namely, football games and the exit of hundreds of vehicles from Calallen High School at once. Programs can reduce the number of vehicles needing to access the school site for pick-up and drop-off. For instance, parent volunteers and school officials can organize walking school busses, in which parents and guardians drop elementary school students a short distance from campus, and students walk together to school as a group. This program offers the added benefit of increasing children’s daily physical activity. More information is available at: http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org/ walking_school_bus/ Figure 5: Improved Traffic Circulation 22 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 23 January 202122 23 January 2021 Land Use, Zoning and Business Strategies L1: Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment Goals Problem While the properties fronting Northwest Boulevard between IH-69 and CR 69 are largely developed, large, undeveloped parcels front the roadway west of CR 69. The PlanCC Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2016 includes a Future Land Use Map for the area, but the Northwest Boulevard Corridor planning process has given the public - and the Planning Division - the opportunity to focus more closely on the Calallen study area. Visioning survey respondents offered broad support for various principles of new development. 59% somewhat or strongly agreed that “the area should provide more compact, mixed-use development,” while 79% somewhat or strongly agreed that “the area should offer more opportunity for jobs and for opening and growing businesses. 91% said restaurants, including fast food, ice cream shops, and sit-down restaurants, are appropriate on Northwest Boulevard, and nearly 70% of respondents said they are appropriate for side streets. Attracting a full-service grocery store and more dining options was the second most popular response to the question “If you could do one thing to improve the Northwest Boulevard area, what would you do?” In response to two alternative future land use map scenarios - in which one offers a uniform land use pattern of residential uses set behind commercial uses facing Northwest Boulevard of consistent intensity, and the other proposes a mix of uses fronting the roadway but varying from higher intensity toward the east to low intensity toward the west - survey respondents frequently cited support for commercial uses fronting Northwest Boulevard, but to limit development intensity westward in the corridor in order to mitigate traffic. Figure 6: Existing Future Land Use Map Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 0 2,000 ft 69 Figure 7: Proposed Future Land Use Map 0 2,000 ft 69 Study area City Boundary High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Water Solution The proposed Future Land Use Map to the left responds to each of the concerns and priorities described above to fulfill the project vision and goals. It combines elements of the two alternatives. This recommendation's intent is to provide only for low-to-moderate intensity commercial or residential uses in the corridor west of FM 1889. However, the Future Land Use Map categories adopted in the PlanCC Comprehensive Plan do not distinguish between low- and high-intensity commercial or mixed uses. Therefore, policymakers considering any proposed changes to the zoning of parcels in this corridor should consult beyond FIgure 7 for guidance. The new map proposes the following changes: • Conversion of Commercial land east of CR 69 to Mixed Use, to incentivize and provide flexibility for redevelopment of aging commercial properties. The intent is not to encourage exclusively residential development directly fronting Northwest Boulevard. • Conversion of low-density residential land east of CR 69 and south of Northwest Blvd. to “Medium-density residential,” consistent with surrounding residential land and more intense uses of this segment of the corridor. • Conversion of land south of the 500’ buffer from Northwest Boulevard between CR 69 and FM 1889 designated “Mixed Use” to “Medium-density residential.” This designation is recommended over “Commercial” in order to allow flexibility to proposed, large developments that include residential uses as part of compact, mixed-use development. The intent is not to encourage exclusively residential development directly fronting Northwest Boulevard. • Conversion of land fronting Northwest Boulevard between East Riverview Street and CR 69 currently designated “Commercial,” “High-density residential,” and “Government” and undesignated land to “Mixed Use” These changes result in a land use plan that allows flexibility necessary for the private real estate development to respond to market demand while respecting community priorities for orderly development. In addition to adopting the Future Land Use Map changes described above, the City should phase public investment into new site-serving infrastructure to areas south of the Northwest Boulevard that currently lack them. Property owners cited this absence of infrastructure access as a key impediment to development of this area. This should be done in coordination with planned improvements to the roadway itself to reduce impact on existing businesses and residents. 1 2 3 4  Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRi v e r w o o d D r Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRi v e r w o o d D r 24 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 25 January 202124 25 January 2021 L2: Relax zoning restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID Goal Challenge COVID-19 has created unprecedented challenges for small and local business owners who, due to coronavirus restrictions, have temporarily closed or reduced services offered. Businesses may have been able to capitalize on temporary financial assistance programs to address gaps in revenue, but as COVID-19 continue to threaten any return to normal, businesses are finding it difficult to make minor, temporary adjustments to their regular operations due to City regulations, or to reduce expenses, such as rent or utility bills. Meanwhile, the study’s participants hold the Northwest Boulevard businesses in high regard and value their small-town feel, while also enjoying the diversity of restaurants, retails and goods, and services the corridor offers. The area residents support strategies that would bolster existing and future businesses, especially restaurants and retail, likelihood of surviving the pandemic. Opportunity Allow outdoor operations in parking spaces City Unified Development Code 7.2.2 requires a standard ratio for all commercial zoning districts; restaurants have the lowest ratio at 1 off-street parking spot per 150 square feet of gross floor area. If businesses such as restaurants and retail could extend their services to 50% of its off-street parking spaces, restaurants would be able to accommodate more customers while maintaining social distancing. The City of Houston launched their “More Space”1 program in August 2020, where at no cost to the business owner, the owner can simply fill out an on-line form stating its intention and proposal to meet the program’s requirements. • Corpus Christi City Code 38-232 restricts no more than two food trucks on a private property. The City may consider granting permission to increase the number of food trucks in a parking lot as long as it does not conflict with the 50% rule previously mentioned. 1. https://houstontx.gov/mayor/press/2020/more-space-program-restaurants.html#:~:text=The%20new%20program%20allows%20any,strict%20health%20and%20safety%20guidance. 2. https://library.municode.com/tx/corpus_christi/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIIITHCOOR_CH38PEVEMOFOVEITMESO_ARTIINGE_S38-17VEGERE Parking lots provide ample space for restaurant-goers to dine outdoors while socially distancing. Source: Montgomery County Planning Commission Conceptual illustration showing the conversion of a parking lot and adjacent plaza into dining space. Source: Montgomery County Planning Commission Collaborate with business owners to transform vacant properties/storefronts into entrepreneurship incubator spaces Businesses may be faced with vacating their leases due to reduced revenue over time. Temporary permits for pop-ups and incubator spaces can be tedious and cost prohibitive. To help facilitate temporary activations, the City of Austin created a Pop-up retail Ordinance (Section 25-1-364)3 that allows for issuance of temporary Certificates of Occupancy. Permits can be issued for up to 45 days and renewed once for a maximum of 90 days. This opportunity creates the flexibility needed for entrepreneurs while helping bridge the costs of rent and property taxes. 3. https://library.municode.com/TX/Austin/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH25-1GEREPR_ART9CECOOC_S25-1-364TECEOC EXISTING PROGRAM United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce Grant Program: up to $5,000 to businesses with 3-20 employees in economically disadvantaged, vulnerable neighborhoods 1 2 3 4  26 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 27 January 202126 27 January 2021 L3: When funding becomes available, continue to provide small business programs that target the long-term impacts of COVID-19 Goal Challenge Available public aid for small businesses and economic opportunity has nearly all been distributed to Corpus Christi businesses and organizations. Unfortunately, the end of the pandemic is likely going to extend through 2021, which will continue to strain small businesses throughout the city. Opportunity Create new marketing opportunities for area businesses, such as “shop local” discounts, regular small business “festival” events, etc. A group of organized businesses can help create an ideal condition for a successful commercial area, promoting each other and contributing to events and special discounts. Marketing and promotions can be an easy first step with a direct impact of attracting foot traffic. At minimum, the group can create a social media campaign, place similarly branded flyers on doorways, and create a discount program for frequent visitors. EXISTING PROGRAM United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce Small Business of the Day highlights a different business everyday. Loca for Local's outdoor market is a local example of a successful curbside pickup and online ordering system during the pandemic with several small businesses participating Provide grants or low/no-interest loans to physically adapt brick and mortar stores These can help fulfill safety standards to keep employers, employees, and customers safe, including plexiglass barriers, walk-up service windows, outdoor seating and shade structures, and social distancing interior modifications. EXISTING PROGRAM City of Corpus Christi COVID-19 Recovery and Response Fund: PPE funds for nonprofits and the Small Business (>20 employees) Regional Pandemic Grant Program available from the United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce, Port of Corpus Christi, and City of Corpus Christi. EXISTING POLICY City of Corpus Christi Resolution 032077 adopted on March 31, 2020 creates the Public Improvement District Policy. Other purchases may include social distancing signage. Source: Kevin Rivoli, The Citizen Businesses need to purchase PPE, such as plexiglass dividers, to protect their customers and employees during the pandemic.. Source: zoranm/E+/Getty Images Coordinated marketing flyers can create a cohesive business district. Source: Steve Mellon / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Create a Public Improvement District (PID) that raises tax revenue for local improvements After business has returned to normal post-COVID, a PID can help the study area’s businesses upkeep public infrastructure like medians and landscaping. Maintenance was raised as a major concern, but beautification of the corridor was a major priority as well. Costs of improvements are paid entirely by property owners within the PID who elect to be included- which is why the timing of this strategy needs to wait for the economic conditions to rebound after COVID-19. 1 2 3 4  28 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 29 January 202128 29 January 2021 Streetscape Strategies Goals No pedestrian or bicycling infrastructure Hardscaped medians Wide lanes Limited safe crossings Reduced lane widths Figure 8: Streetscape Elements Diagram Problem Northwest Boulevard’s current design is incomplete. It is characterized by multiple wide lanes in each direction, hardscaped medians that limit left turn access, few sidewalks, and few safe crossing opportunities for pedestrians. The lack of options to walk on the community’s “Main Street” limits opportunities for the types of neighborhood-serving businesses for which project participants voiced support. The lack of ideal walking/biking options also results in residents using a vehicle to get around, further increasing congestion and traffic. Wide lanes in urban areas also encourage higher speeds. Solution Northwest Boulevard enjoys a wide, 150-foot right-of-way, and so building roadway design elements that improve safety and accessibility for all modes of travel does not require sacrificing vehicular mobility by eliminating traffic lanes. The diagram on pages 12-13 illustrates how many such features work together to create a comprehensive, “complete street” that meets the needs of all users. The guidance that follows should be relied upon to inform the design and engineering of future improvements to Northwest Boulevard. S1: Reduce lane widths Reducing lane widths discourages speeding while preserving traffic flow capacity, and creates more room for pedestrians to safely cross the street, such as at a wide median, or a curb extension. 1 2 3 4  FM 624 Eastbound near Riverwood Drive. 30 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 31 January 202130 31 January 2021 Enhance planting areas Figure 9: Streetscape Elements Diagram S2: Enhance planting areas Beyond a comfortable sidewalk, shade is perhaps the next most important street feature to people walking in the Texas sun. Minimum 6’ wide planting areas located between the back-of-curb and the sidewalk or sidepath are recommended to accommodate shade trees approved by the City’s landscape ordinance and TXDOT. Additional trees may be planted on the outside of sidewalks and sidepaths, between them and the property line. Shade trees enhance sidewalk comfort. Source: Duplantis Design Group Figure 10: Northwest Boulevard Native Plant PalletteTREES Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Water Use: Medium Texas Mountain-Laurel Sophora secundiflora Water Use: Low/Medium Bur Oak Mossycup Oak Water Use: Medium Huisache Acacia farnesiana Water Use: Low Anacua Ehretia anacua Water Use: Low Retama Parkinsonia aculeata Water Use: Low/Medium Live Oak Quercus virginiana Water Use: Medium Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Water Use: Medium TREES Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Water Use: Medium Texas Mountain-Laurel Sophora secundiflora Water Use: Low/Medium Bur Oak Mossycup Oak Water Use: Medium Huisache Acacia farnesiana Water Use: Low Anacua Ehretia anacua Water Use: Low Retama Parkinsonia aculeata Water Use: Low/Medium Live Oak Quercus virginiana Water Use: Medium Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Water Use: Medium TREES Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Water Use: Medium Texas Mountain-Laurel Sophora secundiflora Water Use: Low/Medium Bur Oak Mossycup Oak Water Use: Medium Huisache Acacia farnesiana Water Use: Low Anacua Ehretia anacua Water Use: Low Retama Parkinsonia aculeata Water Use: Low/Medium Live Oak Quercus virginiana Water Use: Medium Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Water Use: Medium Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus Water Use: High Silver Beard Grass Bothriochloa laguroides Water Use: Low Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Water Use: Low Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Water Use: Medium White Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris - ‘white cloud’ Water Use: Low Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea Water Use: Low Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Water Use: Low Broomsedge Bluestem Andropogon virginicus Water Use: Medium ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Fire Bush Hamelia patens Water Use: Medium Autumn Sage Salvia greggii Water Use: Low American Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Water Use: Low Mealy Blue Sage Salvia farinacea Water Use: Low Texas Sage Leucophyllum frutescens Water Use: Low Barbados Cherry Malpighia glabra Water Use: Medium Dwarf Palmetto Sabal minor Water Use: Medium SHRUBS/PERENNIALS Dwarf Wax Myrtle Agave americana Water Use: Low Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus Water Use: High Silver Beard Grass Bothriochloa laguroides Water Use: Low Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Water Use: Low Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Water Use: Medium White Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris - ‘white cloud’ Water Use: Low Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea Water Use: Low Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Water Use: Low Broomsedge Bluestem Andropogon virginicus Water Use: Medium ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus Water Use: High Silver Beard Grass Bothriochloa laguroides Water Use: Low Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Water Use: Low Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Water Use: Medium White Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris - ‘white cloud’ Water Use: Low Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea Water Use: Low Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Water Use: Low Broomsedge Bluestem Andropogon virginicus Water Use: Medium ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Fire Bush Hamelia patens Water Use: Medium Autumn Sage Salvia greggii Water Use: Low American Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Water Use: Low Mealy Blue Sage Salvia farinacea Water Use: Low Texas Sage Leucophyllum frutescens Water Use: Low Barbados Cherry Malpighia glabra Water Use: Medium Dwarf Palmetto Sabal minor Water Use: Medium SHRUBS/PERENNIALS Dwarf Wax Myrtle Agave americana Water Use: Low Fire Bush Hamelia patens Water Use: Medium Autumn Sage Salvia greggii Water Use: Low American Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Water Use: Low Mealy Blue Sage Salvia farinacea Water Use: Low Texas Sage Leucophyllum frutescens Water Use: Low Barbados Cherry Malpighia glabra Water Use: Medium Dwarf Palmetto Sabal minor Water Use: Medium SHRUBS/PERENNIALS Dwarf Wax Myrtle Agave americana Water Use: Low 32 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 33 January 202132 33 January 2021 Wildflower plantings on medians. Source: Prairie Restorations, Inc. Structured plantings on medians. Source: King of Prussia District BENEFITS • Less conflict with vehicles along roadway and planting • More control over type of planting within median • Prioritize funding for pedestrian realm • Provide shade for pedestrian and cyclists • Low Maintenance by using native species and reduction of tree generated debris on roadway CONS • Limited shade on roadway Ornamental Grasses and perennials 18” Offset for maintenance safety and reduce plant over roadway Ornamental Grasses and perennials 18” Offset for mainteance safety and reduce plant over roadway S3: Expand and plant medians Current medians serve access management purposes, but could be reconfigured to provide safer crossings and a more attractive streetscape. The U.S. Access Board’s Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) require a minimum six-foot wide median to accommodate people crossing each direction of roadway travel. Eliminating the existing striped buffers provided for turning lanes, or narrowing lane widths, can provide the space needed to widen existing medians and build new ones that meet this width requirement. Such medians should be designed with a curbed end cap to better protect the pedestrian from head-on and U-turn traffic while in the area of refuge. PROWAG standards require detectable warning surfaces on each side of the pedestrian refuge to assist the visually impaired or those with disabilities.. Structured plantings on medians with trees. Source: Jimbo.info Expand and plant medians Figure 11: Streetscape Elements Diagram Public attitudes toward medians are mixed. Many participants in the first public meeting and respondents to the Visioning Survey warned against investing in median landscapes that the City and State are unable to maintain. Others expressed desire to beautify the roadway by adding plantings along the roadway sides and medians. In response to review of three different median treatments - “Shade,” “Ornamental,” and “Limited,” - a near majority (70 of 144, 49%) preferred Shade, followed by 44 (31%) who preferred the Limited treatment. Given funding constraints for maintenance, the City should work with TXDOT to at a minimum plant drought-resistant ornamental grasses, perennials, and wildflowers, which absorb stormwater, beautify their environment. and require minimal maintenance. Figure 12: Limited Median Landscaping 34 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 35 January 202134 35 January 2021 Custom branded street signs, wayfinding signage and banners help create a sense of place and distinguish a district. Respondents to the Concepts Survey overwhelmingly supported (101 of 144, 70%) conceptual designs for unique street signage that’s consistent with the identity of the Callalen Independent School District. Street banners, which typically adorn individual streetlights or may be hung between separate fixtures, even across a street, can supplement branded signage, and be replaced more frequently to mark or advertise seasonal occasions and events, such as festivals or Street Signs Street Overhead Signage Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Option 2 Option 3 Option 3 Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Figure 13: Street Signage Options football games. 90 of 143 Concept Survey respondents (63%) supported this concept. To support the long-term health and cohesion of the Corridor as a distinct place to live, work and learn, the City should work with the ISD, TXDOT, and community to develop and produce a family of street signage and banner typologies. Initial signage and banner installations should occur toward the eastern side of the Corridor, at intersections with IH-69 southbound, Wildcat Drive, and County Road 69. Monument Signage Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Northwest Boulevard Figure 14: Monument Signage Options S4: Design and install signage and banners 36 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 37 January 202136 37 January 2021 Gateway Option 1 Option 2 NORTHWEST NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BOULEVARD Figure 15: Gateway Options Street Banners Option 2 Option 3 Kite Festival Kite Festival JULY 4th Celebration July 4th, 6:30pm - 9pm Calallen Wildcat Stadium JULY 4th Celebration July 4th, 6:30pm - 9pm Calallen Wildcat Stadium 7.25 County Park County Park 7.25 Option 1 Kite Festival 7.25 County Park Kite Festival County Park 7.25 Figure 16: Street Banner Options Gateway Option 1 Option 2 NORTHWEST NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BOULEVARD S5: Install Public Art Public art is a way to bring creativity and interest to the Calallen study area, and solidify its identity as a small, tight-knit and family-friendly community. Public art should be made by local artists that reflects local culture and traditions. Blank walls on commercial structures make excellent opportunities for murals, while prominently located, publicly owned land is appropriate for sculptures. 75 of 142 Concept Survey respondents (53%) supported this idea. Art locations are suggested at a variety of strategic locations in the district in the concept map on pages 10-11. Existing Hobby Lobby Wall, potential site for a mural. Source: Google Maps Historic Walker Lake Mural. Source: Zakcq Lockrem Mural Existing Underpass Conditions, potential site for a gateway art. Source: Google Maps Toronto Underpass Park. Source: Justin + Lauren Underpass Art Crosswalks near Calallen High School, potential site for crosswalk art. Source: Google Maps Crosswalks in Lima. Source: Carlos Cruz-Diez Crosswalk Art Riverwood Drive, potential site for an art attraction. Source: Google Maps Glass totems in Cathedral Square. Source: Danny Mingledorff Flickr Sculpture Installation 38 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan January 2021 IMPLEMENTATION Overview If implemented successfully, the strategies detailed in this report will contribute significantly to achieving the community's vision for Northwest Boulevard. This responsibility rests not just on the City of Corpus Christi, but also its government, nonprofit and business partners who participated in the planning process. The Implementation Matrix that follows organizes all of the Plan’s recommended strategies in one place. Each strategy includes recommended actions and responsible actors, supportive partners, and phasing. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 39 January 2021 40 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 41 January 2021 January 2021 Implementation Matrix Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities Transportation 1. Reduce congestion at I-69 Study alternatives to existing design, identify preferred design 1 year Less than $500,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT Allocate/identify funding for design and construction 2 years None N/A City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT Complete construction 4 years Up to $5 million FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan TXDOT; CCMPO 2. Improve intersections for safety and mobility Incorporate traffic-calming and pedestrian facilities into designs for prominent intersections 5 years Less than $500,000 per intersection FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities 3. Build active infrastructure along roadways Construct sidepaths as recommended along Northwest Boulevard 5 years Up to $5 million FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO, CCRTA Install buffered bike lanes along recommended roadways 3 years Less than $250,000 City Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT Install shared- lane markings and signage along recommended roadways 3 years Less than $100,000 City Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT 4. Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand Review signal timing at Wildcat Drive and River East Drive to prioritize predominant traffic movements during peak morning and afternoon periods - particularly during the 4pm rush hour. 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT, Calallen ISD Produce and execute a traffic management plan designed for special events 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT, Calallen ISD Organize a walking school bus program and other activities to encourage walking and biking to school 2 years None N/A Calallen ISD 42 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 43 January 2021 January 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities Land Use, Zoning and Business 5. Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment Hold necessary Planning Commission and City Council hearings to approve adoption of updated Future Land Use Map (Figure 7, page 22) 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi Phase investment into new water, wastewater, and drainage infrastructure in areas south of Northwest Boulevard 1-10 years Up to $7 million to be determined through engineering assessment and negotiation of shared costs with developers. City Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi; Nueces County Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities 6. Relax zoning and other city restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID-19 Request City staff to explore a temporary program to expand businesses' outdoor operations into off- street parking. Seek City Council approval. 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi Request City staff to create a temporary Certificate of Occupancy program for entrepreneurs in vacant properties. Seek City Council approval. 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi 44 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 45 January 2021 January 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities 7. Provide small businesses programs that target long-term impacts of COVID-19 Encourage Northwest Boulevard businesses to organize and create marketing opportunities for the area. The City will provide ombudsman services. 1 year None N/A Northwest Boulevard businesses; City of Corpus Christi Continue to provide small and local business resources for low/no-cost loans 1 year None Federal and State grants, Philanthropic grants City of Corpus Christi Small Business Recovery Program Request City staff to determine if the Northwest Boulevard area would benefit from a new Public Improvement District. 2 years None N/A City of Corpus Christi and property owners Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities Landscape/Streetscape 8. Reduce lane widths Design and build enhancements to existing and future conditions of Northwest Boulevard to include narrower lane widths 5 years Less than $100,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 9. Enhance planting areas Design and build enhancements to existing and future conditions of Northwest Boulevard to include street trees 5 years Less than $500,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 10. Expand and plant medians Design and build enhancements to existing and future conditions of Northwest Boulevard to include minimally landscaped, expanded medians 5 years Less than $1 million FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 11. Design and install signage and banners Allocate/identify funding for design and construction 5 years Less than $100,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 12. Install public art Allocate/identify funding for design and construction 5 years Less than $100,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 46 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 47 January 2021 January 2021 Funding the Plan MPO/TXDOT Funds A combination of local, state, federal and even philanthropic funding sources will be necessary to fully implement the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan. As of the report's writing, funding has not been allocated to support all of the improvements and programs recommended in the Corridor Plan. TXDOT and the CC Metropolitan Planning Organization have included $18 million in the regional Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) to expand Northwest Boulevard from four to six lanes with a median, from CR 69 to FM 73, citing traffic volumes and the roadway's designation as a Hurricane Evacuation Route. This Plan has documented several reasons to prioritize funding for roadway improvements outside of capacity expansion, including public desire to mitigate new traffic to the corridor, and to fix existing safety and accessibility problems. 48 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan January 202148Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan January 2021 APPENDIX Engagement Summary and Documentation Assessment of Opportunities Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 49 January 2021 50 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 51 January 2021 January 2021 Public Meetings https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88697436750 • https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88697436750 • Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 2 o • o o o • o o • o • o • o • o 52 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 53 January 2021 January 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 3 • o • o • o o • o Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 4 • o • o • o • o • o o o • o 54 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 55 January 2021 January 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 5 • o • o • o • Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 6 The meeting adjourned before panelists had the opportunity to answer all questions. Unanswered questions are below with responses provided through this document. How far out is the jurisdictional boundary of the zoning area going west on FM 624? The City can only control zoning/land use within its City limits. North of Northwest Boulevard (FM 624), East Riverview Drive is the western boundary. South of Northwest Boulevard, the boundary is parallel to and approximately 1,800 feet west of County Road 73. Have any of the developers personally been to our area? Due to travel restrictions related to COVID-19, the planning consultant team has not yet visited the study area in person but will do so in subsequent project phases when determined safe. The planning consultant team does not include private land developers. What is the total timeline for the construction? TxDOT estimates that construction will begin on Northwest Boulevard from Country Road 73 to Wildcat Drive in five to ten years. However, this estimate is subject to change based on future funding availability and prioritization of regional projects. When will Calallen get an H-E-B grocery store? The City does not know the timing related to the opening of any new H-E-B stores. 56 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 57 January 2021 January 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 7 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 8 58 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 59 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Public Meeting #2 Summary (Web) July 30, 2020 | 5:30 PM - 7:00 PM CT Held via Zoom Webinar video conference https://corridorscc.com/6206/widgets/19187/documents/13061 Presenters: Brianna Frey, Asakura Robinson Matt Rufo, Asakura Robinson Zakcq Lockrem, Asakura Robinson Hugo Colon, Asakura Robinson Annika Gunning Yankee, City of Corpus Christi Dan McGinn, City of Corpus Christi Agenda: 1. Welcome & Introductions (5:30-5:40 PM) 4. Project Overview (5:40-5:45 PM) 5. Engagement Findings 1 (5:45-6:00 PM) 6. Draft Vision Statement & Goals (6:00-6:15 PM) 7. Draft Land Use & Transportation Alternatives (6:15-6:55 PM) 5. Review of Next Steps and Adjourn (6:55-7:00 PM) Summary: The purpose of the meeting was to share key proposed elements of the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan with the community for their review and comment. Brianna Frey introduced Dan McGinn, Director of Planning, and Annika Gunning Yankee, Senior City Planner, who welcomed attendees and explained the project purpose and recognized Councilmember Everett Roy in attendanc e. Matt Rufo followed with a presentation of a project overview, findings from the first phase of public engagement, and draft proposed vision statement and supportive goals. Presenters then took a few moments to respond to several questions. Mr. Rufo, Zakcq Lockrem, and Hugo Colon then presented a series of draft transportation, land use, streetscape and landscape concepts, or alternatives. Following this presentation, presenters responded to additional audience questions. Q&A Part 1 • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni had a clarifying question on the goal: “Businesses can receive support to recover from the loss of income” He specifically asked if it was from COVID support funds or in general. o Zakcq responded that that is referring to COVID incentives. He shared the when concept plans are reviewed later in the presentation, it will offer more details on what that means. o Peter followed-up in concern that the language is very general and implies the government is going to have subsidies no matter what or when; there are limited resources. He states that they probably do not have any more funds and that they used about $1-1.5 million already. He’s not sure if the goal is appropriate. Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 2 • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni asked if the trails/vegetation pictures used in the presentation were in Corpus Christi and the project area specifically. o Matt answered that the image was in Corpus Christi but was not in the project area. He said they are examples near the area. o Zanoni responded that he would not depend on pictures provided on the tourism website, and he suggested finding pictures of a particular site in Hazel Bazemore Park. • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni asked for clarification if the goal “Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses” referred to which location specifically. o Zakcq clarified it refers to the entire Northwest Boulevard study area. o Zanoni suggested that the planning team should make sure that the local residents want the area to be anchored by small businesses or would prefer larger businesses anchoring the area. o Matt clarified that residents did say they wanted small businesses as a priority from the community survey. He did mention the desire for an HEB as one large business, but many people shared a desire to preserve small businesses. • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni asked how many people are on the call. o Matt answered that 25 people were on the call, excluding the panelists. • Question: a chat question asked if the planning team was disappointed that only four percent of respondents were identified as small businesses. o Matt answered yes, that the team would of course want to see more participation from small businesses. He shared, however, that members of the Northwest Business Association have been included in an Advisory Committee for the project and that they’ll continue finding ways how to increase engagement for small businesses in the community when they concepts come up for adoption. • Question: is there additional housing included in the plan? What type of housing? o Matt answered that the city does not plan to create its own housing, but will create conditions for the private market to develop housing since the City’s role is to zone land appropriately to permit housing where needed. He said that later in the presentation they would go over the expected housing demand in the next couple of years from population growth. o Dan acknowledged there are some infrastructure challenges in the area. The city is working with a developer just east of the corridor and just east of the NW Boulevard area in response to the Steel Dynamics project because they know it’s going to have a major impact in Calallen. The city anticipates housing will increase and is doing what they can to help developers for only single-family housing now. Q&A Part 2 • Question: there were questions on eliminating turn lanes and how that applies to customers accessing businesses, including people already expressing concern because customers turning left are already getting backed up turning on the boulevard. o Matt answered the medians now are trying to cover several purposes, such as balance flow through the corridor for thru-traffic access, but medians limit access. A lot can be achieved by working with the interaction to make it easier to turn left or right, make a 60 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 61 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 3 U-turn, etc. He suggested roundabouts go a long way in helping with that and that there is potential to reduce the number and length of medians if you’re making intersections easier to navigate. He reminded participants that this is a TxDOT roadway and that the city does not have the authority to do it, but reassured that if the Plan reflects consistent resident support, it can go a long way with making a case for changes. • Question: there were questions about pedestrian crossways, specifically crossing to the Walmart and Hobby Lobby plaza. How do we encourage pedestrians to cross at traffic lights and not jaywalking? o Matt answered that pedestrians are going to follow their most convenient route. He shared that the school inquired about a pedestrian overpass. He said good pedestrian infrastructure is necessary to preserve the safety with their convenience; he emphasized enhancing the signalized interactions, curb extensions, high -profile crosswalks, high visibility crosswalks, pedestrian countdown signals as pieces of infrastructure the team is proposing at the signalized intersections. He said it can be tricky for the long stretches of roadway between signals; there isn’t a commonly approved way to cross six-lane roadways without putting something like a HAWK signal that only turns red when someone needs to cross the street. He said that he wasn’t sure there were many applications for that across a six-lane roadway in an urban area. o Zakcq added that another challenge here is that there many cases of someone trying to cross the street from one destination to another must typically walk another half-mile to get to a signalized crosswalk, so he suggested that by human nature that if someone is just trying to get directly across to reach their destination, they will naturally take that route, even if it’s dangerous. The school and community college were examples of this. Zakcq shared that the school is shuttling people between those two spaces. He said that we need to think of human-understanding solutions for travel from one location to another. • Question: An attendee asked Matt to clarify that there will be turning opportunities in the corridor to turn left. o Matt shared that there will not be extending medians to block left-turn lanes. They haven’t heard public opinion expressing a desire for that, so it is not on the table. There are places where medians exist and they will stay that way. The design concepts showing medians are those cases. o Hugo added that the median will not go along the whole way because left turns are needed for businesses, residential areas, etc. He said another reason why medians are important is that in those areas where there are crossing, it can act as a refuge for those crossing. Given that this is a six-lane road, the refuge is vital, but this needs more study with TxDOT. • Question: Can we add an RTA bus stop next to the Walmart? Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 4 o Matt answered that whether or not that can be done is something the team can relay to the RTA. RTA is currently considering a change to the routing for the area, so instead of going down Leopard Street, circling Five Points, and heading down Route 77 southward toward Robstown, the route would instead move westward and take a left onto 1889, traveling south in that direction; then the reverse direction back up 1889 to the right to Northwest Boulevard. This case presents the need for new bus stop installations and sidewalk infrastructure to serve them. They are still studying this, but the plan would improve pedestrian facilities, ADA-accessible, and provide safe crossings through the roadway. He wasn’t sure where the suggestion was for the new bus stop or what the challenges were with it, but the comments will be relayed. • Question: if you expand the number of traffic lanes throughout the boulevard, what kind of funnel traffic effect will it create at the current mess we already have at the intersection 69/624? o Matt answered when we talk about the expansion of four lanes to six lanes, it’s going to attract more traffic, which naturally happens when you provide more capacity. It simply attracts more cars. If you’re looking to decrease traffic on 624 or slow the increase, expanding does not help. That is a consideration if you’re weighing in on the land scenarios. The uniform land scenario is one where six lanes make more sense because preserving land uses to be less intense; it goes a long way to prevent six-lane expansion. • Question: What will be done to the intersection that County Road 69 and Northwest Boulevard that is already backed up and will get worse when the new school opens? o Matt answered is that the northern part of 69 will be widened to accommodate that traffic. He brought up roundabouts as potential to support this. The intention would be traffic calming and continuation while providing safety for pedestrians. o Zakcq added that the congestion is happening during pick-up and drop-off. Schools across the country and Texas have created plans to smooth that flow, such as airport cell-phone weighting lots, one-way flows, and more. The team is examining this with the schools. • Question: there are concerns about maintenance for trees and landscaping for medians. o Hugo answered there are ways around this considering planting intensity and strategies for special areas to maintain just those areas. This would need further study. He suggested more intensity can be just for prime locations, such as near schools, so it doesn’t have to be along the whole corridor. In terms of watering, they would focus on low-water, native plants. Some plants may not need irrigation or only at the beginning. o Zakcq added there are nongovernmental ways to adopt a highway or median that can be evaluated. • Question: the panelist said alternate routing was asked about, specifically if the team was considering this or if TxDOT was interested in expanding them or find cross -town routes 62 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 63 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 5 (e.g., County Roads 52 or 73). The concerns were rather than expanding the Northwest Boulevard, is TxDOT considering looking at othe r routes? o Matt answered that 52 is a popular route. He asked Dan if there is no plan to extend 52 westwards. Dan said correct, there is no plan for that. The county did expand 69 to 1889 recently to provide relief from the highway; there is no plan to go further west. • Question: since most of the growth is west coming down 624, there is fear that the beautification recommendations will not address growth outside the project boundary. o Matt answered this is true. He said the city cannot control what is outside its jurisdiction but can work with them about ideas they generally support based on changing conditions, such as new industrial plants. The hope is that this is a plan that guides future land use and transportation de cision-making; a tool rather than concrete law. The plan can be amended as conditions evolve. This plan is intending to capture the overall sentiment the team has received. Additional Notes • Matt and Annika invited attendees who did not have a chance to ask or have their questions answered to submit their questions or comments over email. Adjourn Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee Meeting Summary April 9, 2020 | 1:00 PM Held via GoToMeeting video conference Attendees: Arturo Almendarez Calallen ISD Annika Gunning Yankee City of Corpus Christi, Planning Avery Oltmans City of Corpus Christi, Planning Daniel McGinn City of Corpus Christi, Planning Sarah Munoz City of Corpus Christi, Public Works Yasmene McDaniel Corpus Christi Medical Center- Northwest Angela Rhoden Corpus Christi Medical Center- Northwest Mark Porterfield Grace United Methodist Church Craig Casper MPO Jack Taylor Northwest Business Association Mike Pusley Northwest Business Association Paul Thurman Nueces County Commissioner Office- Precinct 1 Juan Pimentel Nueces County Public Works Gordon Robinson Regional Transportation Authority Judy Telge Transportation Advisory Commission Charles Benavides TxDOT Thomas Tiffin Wood River Community Association Brianna Frey Asakura Robinson (consultant) Matt Rufo Asakura Robinson (consultant) Meghan Skornia Asakura Robinson (consultant) Zakcq Lockrem Asakura Robinson (consultant) Absent: Rose Fernandez Calallen Apartments Everett Roy City of Corpus Christi Councilmember District 1 Carolyn Vaughn Nueces County Commissioner- Precinct 1 Agenda: 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Presentation 3. Group Discussion 4. Next Steps 5. Adjourn Questions for Group Discussion: 1. Does your department/organization have any projects or plans in this study area? Advisory Committee Meetings 64 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 65 January 2021 January 2021 2. What do you and your department/organization see as key issues facing the study area? 3. What are the biggest challenges you see for this project? 4. What opportunities for programming and new uses do you see? What community needs could be met? 5. Who are the key stakeholders that should be engaged? 6. What impediments to implementation might we face? Notes: Welcome and Introductions Presentation ● Discussion and clarification for the engagement timeline during the COVID crisis. ● Discussion and clarification about the plan’s goals, such as the land use component and addressing the existing traffic issues. ● Discussion about upcoming projects along the corridor, including the HEB tract and Country Road 52. Group Discussion ● Discussion of ongoing projects in the area, including from TxDOT, the MPO, and developers. ○ TxDOT is planning flyover enhancements to alleviate vehicle stacking. This project has started and will add additional lanes through new striping. ○ The MPO and TxDOT are funding a separate feasibility study to examine construction along the Northwest Boulevard corridor, but the State will be billions short in tax revenues. Current expected timeline is 24 months ○ HEB owns a large parcel at Northwest Boulevard and FM1889 ○ Calallen Retail Partners also owns adjacent land and plans to build apartments ○ A new elementary school is planned adjacent to the high school. This school will let out at 3pm. 80% to 100% of students will qualify as bus riders. ● Discussion of specific traffic problems, such as certain choke points, peak traffic hours, access management, and dangerous intersections. ○ Attendees expressed concern that any new development will exacerbate existing traffic challenges ○ In general, the Boulevard has high traffic counts - carries about 33,000 vehicles per day, comparable to Staple Street. ○ Country Road 52 was to alleviate traffic counts but has not performed as well as intended ○ Right of way between I-69 and the high school is as wide as possible. ○ Access management ○ I-69 and Northwest Boulevard intersection: ■ Long delays at peak hours, and the problem is worsening. Current delays can be up to 10-15 minutes and worse during school opening and closing times. ■ Stacking regularly occurs at the northbound onramp to I-37 in front of Chilis - TxDOT is examining alternatives to mitigate this traffic. ○ School drop off and pick up impacting traffic patterns - TxDOT works with schools on internal traffic control plans to slow flow onto Northwest Boulevard, such as through metering. ○ A couple hundred of the 1,200 high school students drive their own cars. Eight buses drop off in the morning and pick up in the afternoon. ● Discussion of study area’s challenges, including the lack of available infrastructure for future development, and drainage problems. ○ Continued sprawl of Corpus Christi residents moving outward will continue to increase traffic numbers on Northwest Boulevard ○ Limited utility infrastructure continues to curb potential commercial and residential development in the study area ○ The Boulevard has drainage ditches rather than stormwater drainage system, and stormwater lingers in them for days. ○ The areas south and west of the Boulevard are served by two different water districts. ○ The city’s development regulations require new development sites to have detention ponds to prevent frequent and significant flooding ● Study Area Opportunities: Attendees named several amenities and facilities that could improve quality of life for study area residents, including: ○ Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure that connect homes to schools and open space ○ Increased transit service, particularly for residents of the new Wood River apartments at FM 1889 ○ Practice ballfields (baseball) with lighting ○ Neighborhood bicycle/pedestrian connections to Hazel Bazemore Park ● Discussion of stakeholders that need to be involved in the planning process and how to reach existing residents. ○ Attendees offered support to the project team in identifying study area constituents to engage ○ Existing businesses and the Business Association ○ Neighborhoods and the Neighborhood Associations, including Wood River neighborhood Next Steps ● The project team is conducting a Needs Assessment over the next month and will have a draft for presentation at the next Advisory Committee meeting. ● The project team is also working toward a project public launch and redesigning the engagement plan in light of restrictions against travel and public gathering. Adjourn 66 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 67 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee Meeting Summary May 21, 2020 | 10:00 AM CT Held via Zoom video conference Attendees: Annika Yankee, City of Corpus Christi Avery Oltmans, City of Corpus Christi Charles Benavides, Texas Department of Transportation Craig Casper, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Dan McGinn, City of Corpus Christi Gordon Robinson, Regional Transit Authority Jack Taylor, Northwest Business Association Keren Costanzo, City of Corpus Christi Judy Telge, Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living & Transportation Advisory Commission Leane Heldenfels, City of Corpus Christi Mark Porterfield, Grace United Methodist Church Michael Alvarez Mike Pusley, Northwest Business Association Rob MacDonald, Corpus Christi MPO Brianna Frey, Asakura Robinson Meghan Skornia, Asakura Robinson Abygail Mangar, Asakura Robinson Matt Rufo, Asakura Robinson Zakcq Lockrem, Asakura Robinson Agenda: 1. Introductions 4. Project Schedule 5. Phase I: Findings 6. Phase II: Visioning 7. Phase II: Outcomes 5. Adjourn Notes: Introductions Presentation • Discussion on project schedule status • Discussion on latest city goals • Discussion on Phase I findings from the Needs Assessment; Focuses on residents, land use, open space / community assets, congestion and safety. Concluded with discussion on what is missing from Needs Assessment findings. • Discussion on Phase II visioning; focuses on land use changes from 2016 comprehensive plan, recent TxDOT and CC MPO regional Transportation Improvement Plan investment, development opportunities/ideas (e.g., streetscape, public arts/murals, bicycling infrastructure). Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 2 • Discussion on marketing the upcoming engagement • Summary of Phase II outcomes (i.e., vision statement, supportive goals, development ideas) Project Overview • Discussion on upcoming meeting and goals: o 5/28 is first virtual public meeting. Marketing materials (e.g., flyers) have already been created and will be shared o Draft vision statement and goals will be determined following the meeting; draft deliverables will be submitted to committee in July for public comment o Judy: concern from the wording that there will be an emphasis on accessibility (i.e., not ADA requirement, but feeling the word “accessibility” must explicitly be in the goals). Multimodal and accessibility must vitally be reflected.  Matt shared that there will be engagement questions regarding top 3 words important to project, where such comments as these would be highly relevant o Mike P.: public meeting announcements must go out to NW business association so that they have time to participate if interested. NW Chamber of Commerce is suggested. Phase I: Findings • Discussion on Needs Assessment o Poll on who received the reviewed the Needs Assessment. o Attendees were skeptical of the traffic volume information shared:  Mike P. requested clarification on the lack of change in traffic volumes in the last 20 years. Zakcq: traffic volume decreased significantly during the Great Recession. Explained data from Figure 20 of the Needs Assessment that clarified the different types of traffic changes. o Clarification on zoning map changes:  Commercial #3 rezoned to residential? Site #3 is called Martin Plaza. It is zoned commercial. It was recently subdivided into two commercial lots. The subdivision plat application indicates urgent care is proposed at that location. o Attendees expressed concern on accessibility and public transportation for vulnerable populations:  Judy: Pedestrian access will be needed for any added bus stops to the corridor, especially connections to schools and apartments. 68 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 69 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 3  Gordon: Higher priority to increase flex service to grocery stores and other key destinations. Would like to program the capital for ADA compliance because some apartments are not served effectively.  Annika: Laura R. is a nurse, serving residents of low-income. Route 27 public transit would be especially useful for these underserved groups according to Laura.  Mike P.: Impact on county roads have had on current traffic conditions and routes, particularly how it may favorably impact conditions. On the development and right on way maps, County Road 52 goes all the way to FM 1889. Phase II: Visioning • Clarification on existing plans and investments: o Comprehensive plan approved in 2016 provided new land use map o TxDOT and CC MPO already approved $18 million for street infrastructure improvements, but the designs from the proposal not approved yet. o Jack T: Curb cuts as currently configured are essential to his businesses and asked whether those changes would be made by this plan. Matt R. responded that proposed guidelines may suggest improvements to future curb cuts but that existing curb cuts from recently completed development will not be prioritized for changes. • Reviewed examples of streetscape mechanisms (e.g., wayfinding, bike racks, signage, etc.) that could be implemented in the project. Other design enhancements reviewed include public art/murals, pedestrian safety infrastructure, bicycling infrastructure. • Discussion on materials available to advertise upcoming engagement opportunities: o Public meeting will be 5/28 at 6 PM; website, flyer, and city press release/social media are available about the project and meeting o planning@cctexas.com email to respondents on marketing documents. Commission and city council engagement will be in late August / early September. Visioning survey and marketing materials provided in email sent in the past week. o Reviewed sections and capacities of visioning survey Phase II: Outcomes • Summary on phase II outcomes (i.e., vision statement, supportive goals, development ideas) Next Steps • Visioning survey is on the website and looking for as many respondents as possible. Action: Annika send survey • May 28th: public meeting • June: consultant team analysis meeting • July: advisory meeting #3 • Late July: public meeting #2 Adjourn Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee Meeting Summary May 21, 2020 | 10:00 AM CT Held via Zoom video conference Attendees: Annika Yankee, City of Corpus Christi Avery Oltmans, City of Corpus Christi Carolyn Vaughn, Commissioner Charles Benavides, Texas Department of Transportation Craig Casper, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Dan McGinn, City of Corpus Christi Dr. Arturo Almendarez, Callalen ISD Gordon Robinson, Regional Transit Authority Jack Taylor, Northwest Business Association Keren Costanzo, City of Corpus Christi Judy Telge, Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living & Transportation Advisory Commission Leane Heldenfels, City of Corpus Christi Michael Alvarez, City of Corpus Christi Public Works Sarah M, City of Corpus Christi Public Works Thomas Tiffin, P.E, Red River Community Association Brianna Frey, Asakura Robinson Hugo Colon, Asakura Robinson Meghan Skornia, Asakura Robinson Matt Rufo, Asakura Robinson Zakcq Lockrem, Asakura Robinson Agenda: 1. Introductions 4. Project Overview 5. Engagement Findings 6. Draft Vision Statement and Goals 7. Draft Land Use and Transportation Alternatives 5. Review of Next Steps and Adjourn Notes: Introductions Presentation • Discussion on project schedule status • Discussion on survey findings • Discussion on Vision Statement and Goals, including reviewing PlanCC, draft Vision Statement and the four goals. Concluded with a discussion of first reactions to drafted goals. • Discussion on the Concept Plan, which encompasses seven categories of transportation, land use, zoning, small business support, streetscape, landscape, and public art/placemaking. Concluded with a discussion of support or concern. 70 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 71 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 2 • Discussion on project’s remaining steps through September. Project Overview • Discussion on upcoming meeting and goals: o 7/30 is second virtual public meeting. Marketing materials (e.g., flyers) have already been created and will be shared o Draft vision statement and goals will be refined following this meeting and the public meeting; draft concept plan will be finalized as well to support the final vision statement and goals. Engagement Findings • Discussion on survey findings o Judy was happy to hear safety features are of high importance. She gave an overview on the Transportation Advisory Committee’s efforts and concerns, and confirmed the consultant team was looking at Vision Zero and the Active Mobility Plan. o Attendees supported the summary of survey findings. Draft Vision Statement and Goals • Discussion on Vision Statement and Goals o Attendees expressed concern on the alignment of the goals to any upcoming MPO work, and asked for clarification on funding and timing of MPO work.  Commissioner Vaughn expressed concern that this study’s beautification efforts would not be reflected in future MPO work.  Charles asked for clarification on MPO funding because dollars have not been allocated yet.  Craig clarified that yes, although the Northwest Boulevard/FM 624 has been identified as a priority area, the Harbor bridge has consumed a majority of the MPOs funding. 2025-2028 is a likely timeline for this effort’s implementation. Clarified that federal funding is performance based.  Zakcq highlighted this planning effort will hopefully position the corridor well for federal funding opportunities.  Annika shared a story about a North Carolina community who formed a Corridor Commission 10 years in advance of a highway redevelopment project, to better align their community’s vision with future construction. o Judy asked for clarification on what was highlighted in the survey results about housing and affordable housing.  Matt explained the mixed results from the survey respondents. Most agreed with the statement that anyone who works in the study area should find housing options, but in another question a majority opposed diverse new housing types. Housing is not addressed in the goals, but the consultant team hopes to collect more nuance from the public in the next phase of engagement. • Draft Land Use and Transportation Alternatives o Discussion of the transportation strategies  Attendees were supportive of the school improvement recommendations, but asked for a more detailed recommendation regarding traffic patterns after major school events, like football games. Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 3 • Artie described the illegal U-turns when attendees want to redirect back east towards I-69. • Zakcq suggested a more detailed phone call between the project team, TxDOT, and the Schools. o Discussion of the land use strategies  The group asked for clarification on if the plan shows residential south of Northwest Boulevard, are we proposed the City would develop utilities? • Matt provided explanation that no, the land use and zoning recommendations would set the stage for private development to build where the market is feasible. o Due to time limitations, following discussion of zoning, small business support, streetscape designs and landscape elements, the Advisory Committee was asked to provide comments through email or through the upcoming online survey. Next Steps • Concept plan survey will be posted the website during the public meeting and the team is looking for as many respondents as possible. o Action: Annika will share survey once it’s been presented at the public meeting. • July 30: Public meeting #2 • August: Consultant team will refine preferred concepts into a Corridor Plan with implementation tactics. • September: Presentation of final report at public hearings. Adjourn 72 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 73 January 2021 January 2021 Surveys and Results Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 1 Visioning Survey Summary Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan Prepared by Asakura Robinson July 15, 2020 Overview The Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan process has sought public input on priorities for land use, transportation, and streetscape enhancements. To this end, the City of Corpus Christi Planning Division published an online visioning survey on May 20th, 2020 to gather input from area stakeholder. The responses yielded the following top priorities: 1. Reduce traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard. Approximately 80% of respondents strongly agreed that the roads should be more convenient for drivers, particularly by mitigating traffic congestion and improving roadway safety. 2. Introduce more grocery shopping and dining options. Respondents shared a strong desire for a grocery store and family-friendly dining options. 3. Enhance beauty and landscaping in the area. Respondents desire to improve area aesthetics with proper landscape maintenance. 4. Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety. Over 50% of respondents strongly agreed that the study area’s roads should be safer, more accessible, and convenient for bicyclists and pedestrians. Disparities were shown in the representation of survey respondents, particularly regarding household income. The survey showed a 15-percentage points gap in representation of households with incomes under $50,000 in the study area. Further engagement efforts should therefore attempt to better achieve representation from lower-income households. Methodology The survey encompassed 17 questions regarding respondents’ perspectives on the Northwest Boulevard’s current landscape and desired and safety. It was open from May 20th to June 29th, 2020, accumulating 435 responses in the open period. Surveys were made available online through a website dedicated to the Northwest Boulevard project (https://corridorscc.com/). The survey was also advertised at the first public meeting on May 28th, 2020, as well as on several social media platforms (e.g., Facebook. Twitter, Instagram, etc.). Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 2 Findings The following sections illustrate the findings of each question from the survey. Question 1: What is your connection to the Northwest Boulevard area? (n=434) The majority of respondents identified as living in the Northwest Boulevard area. The second most comment connection to Northwest Boulevard was visiting the area for retail, shopping, or dining. 15% own property in the area. Approximately 11% of respondents work in the area, and nearly 10% identified as either going to school, owning a business, or having another unidentified connection to the area. 37% 28% 15% 11% 4%4%1%0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% I live in the area I go out to eat, shop or go to events in the area I own property in the area I work in the area I go to school in the area I own a businessin the area Other I have no connection to the area% of RespondentsConnection to Northwest Boulevard 74 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 75 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 Question 2: What makes the Northwest Boulevard area a unique and special place today? (n=327) A free response format, this question gave respondents the opportunity to share their thoughts on the study area’s greatest assets. While no specific prompts were given, a handful of consistent themes emerged: 1. The study area enjoys a small-town atmosphere, yet has access to the amenities and services of a big city. o “Small town nested inside a city, with great potential for growth.” o “The small town feel makes it special and the high school being physically central create a focus on youth and young kids.” o “Small town community "feel" and culture, with conveniences of being part of a larger city.” o “It has everything you could need while still maintaining that small town feel” o “Small town” feel, but also has many restaurants, shops, etc. It is convenient for those who live in the area so we don’t have to drive into town for everything.” o “Away from the hustle and bustle that exists in other areas of the city. Like living in the country but being in the city limits.” 2. The study serves achieves many purposes, meeting many needs in one space. o “I use it every single day to go to and from my house and everything we shop is in the same area!! It’s our lifeline.” o “It has everything we need and nothing we dont. It's quiet, away from the city, and has a great school.” o “Various businesses, schools, and parks are all in a central area.” o “The ease of getting to the area along with the surprising variety of places to eat and shops to visit.” 3. The study area represents a small, tight knit community. o “It’s a small community where people take care of one another. Going out you frequently run into friends or family.” o “The small town feeling. Everyone knows everyone. The fact a lot of the stores or shopping is super close.” o “We are a close knit community away from the main part of the city but close enough to have all the benefits of a city.” o “It is a tight-knit community, with almost everything we need within a stone's throw.” 4. The study area offers many businesses and shopping options to residents. o “Business growth and a diverse population that reside there have made the areas around Northwest Blvd a true melting pot with its own unique sense of pride and character.” o “It’s a small town with some big and small businesses to keep me and my family happy.” o “Still has small business, family-owned unique places. Friendly people with good customer service.” o “What makes it special is the amount of people who don’t live in the area that come to visit and enjoy the small businesses.” Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 4 Question 3: What are three words you would use to describe your vision for the future of the Northwest Boulevard area? (for instance: healthy, prosperous, safe, fun, family-friendly, welcoming, accessible) (n=379) The chosen words for vision regarded topics of safety, accessibility, economic development, transportation, and culture. Over 20% of respondents identified safety as its main vision for Northwest Boulevard. A desire for a family-friendly environment was clear as the second top word for vision. Accessibility was the third most common word for a vision of Northwest Boulevard; based on the feedback given in other questions, accessibility seemed to regard road accessibility in terms of traffic conditions. It should be noted that several of the top words from respondents were given in the question itself as examples, potentially acting as a leading question. 22% 13%11% 7%5%4%3%2%1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Top Words for Vision 76 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 77 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 5 Question 4: If you could do one thing to improve the Northwest Boulevard area, what would you do? (n=395) Transportation topics collectively represented nearly 70% of responses as the one improvement desired for Northwest Boulevard. Improving traffic flow and congestion was respondents’ top concern for improvement with 47% of responses. Other transportation concerns discussed included traffic light challenges (i.e., potential light synchronization issues in particular and the desire for more lights) and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Regarding the latter, one respondent wrote, “Find a way to accommodate foot traffic safely. There are too many walkers on the shoulders of the road. There should be sidewalks a safe distance from the road and perhaps barriers to prevent road traffic from impeding sidewalks.” The second top choice for improvement was a need for a grocery store and more restaurants in the study area. Other top desired improvements included a desire for more businesses and improving infrastructure (i.e., in general, or specific mentions to burying power lines); government/city services and healthcare regarded the desire for a larger police presence as well as a desire for a hospital in the study area. 3%3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 12% 47% One Improvement to Northwest Boulevard Better Government/City Services and Healthcare Upgrade Infrastructure Increase the Businesses/Shopping Options Improve Bicycling and Pedestrian Safety Address Traffic Lights Challenges Enhance Beautification and Landscaping Develop a Grocery Store and Restaurants Improve Traffic Flow and Congestion Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 6 Question 5: Please tell us how much you agree with the following land use priorities. (n=432) The two most supported land use priorities for Northwest Boulevard were: • The area should offer more opportunity for jobs and for opening and growing businesses (79% “Strongly agree” or “Agree”) • Area signage should be regulated to be more attractive (72% “Strongly agree” or “Agree”) The two most opposed land uses for the study area were: • The area should allow light industrial uses, such as warehousing, commercial food production, commercial printing, commercial laundry, etc. (54% “Strongly disagree” or “Disagree”) • The area should provide a wider variety of housing options for different types of households (45% “Strongly disagree” or “Disagree”) Respondents showed more mixed attitudes toward the remaining two land use priorities presented. Approximately 60% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Northwest Boulevard should provide more compact, mixed-use development to promote walkability in the area; nearly 60% of respondents also agreed or strongly agreed that people who work in Northwest Boulevard should be able to find housing in the area. 47%41%32%27% 13%8% 32%31% 27%28% 17%15% 11%20% 22%25% 24% 22% 6%5% 10%12% 19% 22% 4%3% 9%8% 26%32% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% The area should offer more opportunity for jobs and for opening and growing businesses Area signage should be regulated to be more attractive The area should provide more compact, mixed-use development that makes it easier for people to walk to places if they wish or if walking is their only form of transportation People who work in the area should be able to find housing within their means in the area The area should provide a wider variety of housing options for different types of households The area should allow light industrial uses, such as warehousing, commercial food production, commercial printing, commercial laundry, etc.% of RespondentsLand Use Priorities Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 78 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 79 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 Question 6: What kind of housing needs are currently not being met in the Northwest Boulevard area? What should be done to address them? (n=278) The most common response was that Northwest Boulevard’s current housing market is sufficient (31%). Respondents’ second most common sentiment regarded an unfavorable viewpoint toward low-income or government housing (11%). Many respondents proposed housing options alternative to low-income or government options: multifamily housing (10%), affordable housing in general (10%), single-family housing (10%), and middle-class housing (8%). One respondent shared, “Affordable apartments or townhomes that aren’t income restricted. Either you make too much or not enough, but rent is still high. Not sure what should be done to address them.” *LIH: low-income housing 1% 1% 2% 3% 7% 8% 8% 10% 10% 10% 11% 31% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Mobile Homes Need More Housing Overall Condos High End Housing Not Sure Other Housing Concerns More Middle Class Housing More Affordable Housing More Single Family More Multifamily Housing Too Much LIH* / No More LIH Current Housing Sufficient % of Responses Unmet Housing Needs in Northwest Boulevard Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 8 Question 7: Please add any additional thoughts you have about housing in the area. (n=205) This question was a free response format for respondents to share their thoughts on housing in the study area. The following themes emerged: 1. The study area lacks a variety of housing options. o “There’s not much that meets the needs of the average working class or single income families.” o “Townhome options for senior citizens should be encouraged to build.” o “Would be nice to have single living options outside of low income options.” 2. The study area shows challenges in affordable housing for residents. o “Being someone who makes $50k/year, it was hard to find a house in the area I could afford. If I could, it wasn't in the shape or neighborhood I wished to live. Renting an apartment = house payment.” o “Affordable housing options but with property standards to be kept. Nice architectural features with clean and appealing aesthetic and colors.” o “The city needs more affordable housing options and mixed used residential areas.” 3. The study area requires infrastructure upgrades in order to support new development. o “Need to be able to walk on sidewalks from houses to school and businesses.” o “It needs to be developed with sewer lines not septic.” o “People want acreage and utilities.” *LIH: low-income housing 80 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 81 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 9 Question 8: Please tell us how much you agree with the following roadway and transportation priorities. (n=427) The most supported roadway and transportation priority for Northwest Boulevard was “Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be more convenient for auto traffic, with less congestion,” with 94% agreement, 80% of which was strong agreement. Safety for bicyclists and pedestrians was the second- highest transportation priority, with one in three respondents agreeing that roads must be safe, accessible, and convenient for bicyclists and pedestrians. Addressing landscaping and beautification also showed a considerable agreement, with 69% identifying it as a priority. Improvement of public transportation (i.e., buses) to connect people in the Northwest Boulevard area to other parts of the region was slightly unfavorable (17%) but overall, 48% agreed or strongly agreed that this is a priority. Public transportation connections into the Northwest area similarly showed slight opposition (16%) but general agreement, with 49% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing it is a priority. One in three respondents, expressed neutral perspectives on these statements (i.e., 36% and 34%, respectively). 80% 53%43% 26%24% 14% 22% 26% 22%25% 4% 12%18% 36%34% 1% 5%5%8%7% 1% 8%7%9%9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be more convenient for auto traffic, with less congestion Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be safer and more accessible and convenient for people to walk or bike along (such as by adding sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian signals) Northwest Boulevard and area roads should have more trees and landscaping for beautification and shading Northwest Boulevard should have better transit/bus options that connect the area to other parts of the region. Northwest Boulevard should have better transit/bus options to help people get to places along Northwest Boulevard.% of RespondentsRoadway and Transportation Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 10 Question 9: What types of new public and commercial uses are appropriate in the Northwest Boulevard area? (n=426) The survey asked respondents to indicate whether various types of public and commercial land uses were appropriate on Northwest Boulevard or on side streets. • Restaurants were the most supported land use for the overall study area. 91% said that this category, including fast food, ice cream shops, and sit-down restaurants, is appropriate on Northwest Boulevard, and nearly 70% of respondents said they’re appropriate for side streets. • 84% of respondents said retail goods are appropriate on Northwest Boulevard, and 70% said they’re appropriate on side streets. • 76% of respondents said outdoor commercial recreation is appropriate on side streets, while 60% said they’re appropriate for Northwest Boulevard. • The most opposed use in the study area was vehicle sales and services (e.g., car rentals, repair shops, tire sales, etc.). 24% of respondents said they’re not appropriate anywhere in the study area, while 20% said they’re only appropriate on Northwest Boulevard. Nevertheless, a plurality – 28% - said they’re appropriate everywhere in the study area. • 23% of respondents opposed overnight accommodations (hotels, bed and breakfasts, inns, motels) anywhere in the study area, though 52% said they’re appropriate on Northwest Boulevard. 82 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 83 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 11 Question 10: Please add any additional thoughts you have about public and commercial development in the area. (n=159) 1. Address traffic congestion and roadway challenges in the study area. o “Need better roads to and from the area. Easy access to make it safer.” o “Safer use for pedestrians and cyclists.” o “The commute from FM 666 to IH 37 has become significantly more dangerous & time consuming within the last 5 years. Adding more commercial businesses and neighborhoods will only increase the problem. Please concentrate on alternate routes.” o “This area has been neglected for too long and because of that there is an increase in traffic accidents, traffic congestion, risky driving related to frustration and others driving under the posted speed limit, which further causes congestion.” o “Yes, there are several areas of concern with NW BLVD. The majority of the issues are during commuting times and when Calallen ISD is in session. Again, my suggestion is to expand FM 52 to a four lane with biking and sidewalks, not NW BLVD.” 2. Respondents want additional shopping, restaurants, and businesses in the study area. o “More fun type restaurants for gathering with friends.” o “Mom and Pop Main street type of business/local owners.” o “We are a residential community and wish to remain so. Shopping and recreational activities are welcome. Minimize industrial activities and high-density housing.” o “We need more restaurants in the area that are more diverse.” 3. Respondents want a grocery store in the study area. o “We need an HEB.” o “Just hoping for more variety of food options or grocery options like for instance a meat market.” o “We need a large Grocery store.” 4. Respondents want development in the study area to be based on strategic decisions, such as master planning. o “There needs to be a plan. The plan needs to be enforced. Currently there is too much mixed business/housing/office in the area that makes it less approachable for shopping/eating than other parts of Corpus Christi.” o “Commercial development needs to be spread out all the way down NW boulevard and not just compacted at 5 points.” o “Love the idea of development as long as it looks uniform to the are and traffic flows well.” Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 12 Question 11: In which ZIP code do you live? (n=356) Respondents covered 22 ZIP codes areas and 12 cities/towns. Representation was highest from ZIP code 78410 (238 responses, 67%) and 78380 (77 responses, 22%). 84 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 85 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 13 Question 12: What is your age? (n=427) Question 13: How would you describe yourself? Select all that apply. (n=367) Approximately 88% of respondents identified as White. This roughly matched the Assessment of Opportunities report’s findings of the White population accounting for 90% of the study area’s total resident population. One-percent of study area residents is Black, but the survey only received one respondent that identified as Black; Asian respondents similarly were lacking representation in the survey with only one respondent identifying as so while the study area shows one% of Asian-identifying residents. The survey nevertheless seemed to closely resemble the racial breakdown of the study area. 0% 14% 41% 32% 13% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Under 18 18-34 35-49 50-64 Over 64% of RespondentsAge of Respondents 5%5%0% 0% 2% 0% 88% Race of Respondents Prefer to self describe More than once race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderAsian Native American or Alaska Native Black or African American White Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 14 Question 14: Are you of Hispanic or Latinx origin? (n=350) Approximately 29% of respondents identified as having a Hispanic or Latinx origin. The Assessment of Opportunities report found that approximately 47% of the study area’s residents identified as Hispanic, demonstrating a 18 percentage point discrepancy between residents and survey respondents. Question 15: What is your annual household income (before taxes)? (n=349) The Needs Assessment found that 22% of the study area’s residents have household incomes below $50,000, but the survey represented only 10% of individuals under this threshold. This marked a socioeconomic disparity in survey respondents, most notably seen in the representation of households with income under $15,000. Another socioeconomic disparity was seen with overrepresentation of households with incomes over $75,000. 71% 29% Hispanic/Latinx Origin of Respondents No Yes 1%2% 7% 16%18% 27% 30% 7% 4% 11% 16% 13% 20% 28% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Less than $15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 More than $150,000 Household Income of Residents with Comparison to the Study Area Survey Northwest Boulevard 86 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 87 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 15 Question 16: Please add any other thoughts or ideas you have for improving the Northwest Boulevard area. (n=186) 1. Respondents want the study area to show beautification, landscaping, and improved signage in the study area. o “Beautification!! Goes a long way.” o “This area is the future of Corpus Christi and is the first impression for tourists and visitors coming here. Make it more attractive and accessible so they want to return.” 2. Respondents want improvement in public services and safety in the study area. o “Make it safe.” o “Keep it clean and community friendly. Keep the community involved!” o “Keeping it safe and clean in all ways including types of businesses.” 3. Respondents want the traffic congestion addressed in the study area. o “Better traffic flow. Too much congestion around schools, shopping centers, and entrance and exit off main highway.” o “Traffic congestion needs to be addressed, especially around Calallen High School. It feels like there is no plan for the area so whatever goes.” o “Traffic flow and congestion needs to be addressed.” 4. Respondents want to grocery store in the study area. o “We need an HEB.” Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 16 Other Non-Survey Comments Participants in public meetings and other engagement events were given the project managers’ contact information to share additional comments through email. The following were highlighted quotes from email feedback. “I know we are very interested in seeing the bus stops extended into our area since the route seems to stop near the high school presently. It would be nice to see it continue out to the Wood River area which would give access to our church location and some of the services we offer.” – Grace United Methodist Church Food Distribution (Emailed on 7/3/2020) “While driving down the current road trying to envision the project. We do not want three more miles of unkept medians and overgrown right of ways that the state of Texas only maintains on a semiannual or quarterly basis. Nor do we want the overgrown median on Leopard St near Violet Rd or Callicoatte. Which the City of Corpus Christi neglects. We’ve been forgotten for years don’t start something you don’t intend to maintain.” (Emailed on 6/9/2020) List of Traffic and Land Use Priorities (Emailed on 4/24/2020): • What are the key issues facing the study area? o Lack of east and west traffic carrying corridors. o Please notice that Hwy 77 or I-69 has limited east/west penetrations at Northwest Blvd., County Rd. 52 and County Rd. 48. With minimal right-of-way extensions east of said highway. o Several large areas of residential infill needed to complete traffic circulation particularly in the Annaville area. o Limited land use growth opportunities to the north and south of the following major corridors Leopard, Northwest Boulevard and IH-37. Limitations are due to several factors: 1) Nueces River (Annaville & Calallen areas) 2) and more concerning the encroachment and expansion of the Industrial districts in the Annaville & Tuloso Midway areas. o Air quality or lack there of in and around the Kane meat processing facility and industrial plants. Solar Estates and Arlington Heights neighborhoods adversely impacted with very poor air quality on most days. • Assets and opportunities: What is important to preserve, protect, and enhance? o Several large undisturbed natural areas in and around the Nueces River. o City to continue making enhancements to West Guth Park (large regional park) More tree plantings, water feature improvements, etc. o Encourage Nueces County to make enhancements to Hazel Bazemore Park. o More tree plantings, upgrade to facilities and park features. • Challenges and threats: What problems need to be solved? o Improve the traffic grid. Extremely limited east and west traffic corridors funnel traffic loads onto Northwest Boulevard and Leopard creating a real traffic snarl at five points and other intersections along said corridor and Leopard. o City Engineering needs to improve many rural residential rights-of-way by building proper curb and cutter and ADA compliant sidewalks. Many older residential neighborhoods do not have sidewalks so there is no walkable connectivity. • What changes are planned for the study area? 88 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 89 January 2021 January 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 17 o A new H.E.B. was forecast to be constructed but has yet to be built. This would seriously relieve the over grounding at the both Walmart and current H.E.B. at Violet and Leopard. o County Road 52 or Cooperative Avenue improvements must continue to relieve traffic pressures on Northwest Boulevard. o Development of and east and west corridor in the Annaville area south of Leopard between I-69 Corridor and Callicoatte Road, Violet Road, McKinzie Road and Rand Morgan Road. o Improvements to HWY 44 with new and under construction overpasses between Corpus Christi and Robstown. • What uses would you propose for new private development? o City sale a portion or all of Labonte Park to private water park developeramusement park. o Development of additional grocery store opportunities. Both H.E.B. and Walmart function as regional stores in an expanding food desert in this area of Nueces county and Corpus Christi. • What kind of public amenities and services are desired? Answered above. • Who are the key stakeholders? o Multiple Refinery Companies with terminals and facilities abutting and o encroaching into planned residential areas. o Nueces County o City of Corpus Christi o Engineering Department (traffic engineering) o Parks and Recreation o Code Enforcement Transportation and Land Use Strategies Survey Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan Prepared by Asakura Robinson July 29 – August 23rd, 2020 The Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan process has sought the public’s feedback on support, opposition, or other thoughts on 20 transportation and land use strategies proposed for the Northwest Boulevard study area. The City of Corpus Christi Planning Division published an online transportation and land use concepts survey on July 23rd, 2020 to gather input from area stakeholders. The survey closed on August 23rd. The responses yielded the following key takeaways: 1. Strong support for the Vision Statement. Approximately 78 percent of respondents supported the Vision Statement for this project. 2. Coordinating with Calallen ISD to mitigate school traffic (i.e., including one-way drop-off and pickups, closing U-turns during special events, and organizing walking school buses) is the most supported strategy out of the 20 given. Approximately 82 percent of respondents supported this strategy. 3. Agreement with Goal #2: “Northwest Boulevard is prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses.” This goal received 76-percent of respondents support, showing the most supported out of the four proposed Goals for the Northwest Boulevard study area. Some respondents left additional comments expressing a desire for more information on the business incentives to allow for this goal. 4. Mixed feelings on the small business support strategies. The six small business support strategies received a range of 25-64 percent strong agreement. “Create a Public Improvement District that raises tax revenue for local improvements,” received the strongly opposition (i.e., 28 percent collectively somewhat and strongly opposing). “Create new marketing opportunities for area businesses” received the strongest support (i.e., 87 percent collectively somewhat and strongly supporting). 5. Mixed feelings on currently adopted Future Land Use Map. Many respondents express support for the future land use map, particularly for its flexibility on what could be developed and the mixed-use (i.e., commercial, low and high residential). The “Uniform” future land use scenario overall seemed to show more support, however, compared to the “Transitional” future land use scenario. 6. Concern for roundabouts safety. Several respondents expressed concern that the study area’s visitors are not educated on roundabout usage (i.e., causing more accidents). The opposition was from this concern, but roundabout education was recommended by some. 7. Mixed feelings on public art and other aesthetics. About half of respondents supported public art ideas. Opposing respondents expressed that public art funds be instead used to address critical infrastructure needs before such aesthetics. Respondents shared similar opposing sentiments regarding a gateway entrance and signage. Summary of Question Responses Q1 Do you support the following Vision Statement? "Northwest Boulevard is Calallen’s “Main Street,” providing the amenities of a prosperous neighborhood center in a small, tight- knit community. The Boulevard is a welcoming, diverse, and family-friendly place where people go to shop, gather, invest in businesses, play and raise a family." 90 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 91 January 2021 January 2021 • I support this goal (78%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (12%) • I have no opinion (3%) • I have more thoughts to share (7%) Q2 Do you support Goal #1? Northwest Boulevard is safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. » Congestion is less frequent, making it easier for people to get around and navigate the neighborhood. » Traffic is calmed, making it safer for people to drive, walk across, and bike along the boulevard. » Streets and sidewalks are accessible, built to ADA standards. • I support this goal (65%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (28%) • I have no opinion (2%) • I have more thoughts to share (6%) Q3 Do you support Goal #2? Northwest Boulevard is prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses. » A variety of neighborhood restaurants and retail outlets offer a diverse array of goods, services, and family-friendly experiences » Businesses can receive support and incentives from public entities to recover from loss of income • I support this goal (76%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (14%) • I have no opinion (7%) • I have more thoughts to share (4%) Q4 Do you support Goal #3? Northwest Boulevard is healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. » Trees and vegetation provide shade and help drain stormwater » Trails are easily accessible for walking, hiking and biking • I support this goal (68%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (19%) • I have no opinion (9%) • I have more thoughts to share (5%) Q5 Do you support Goal #4? Northwest Boulevard is attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole. » Public infrastructure is expanded to areas planned for development » Public art and neighborhood branding convey a sense of place and beautify the public realm. » Wayfinding signage draws attention to neighborhood attractions and guides visitors » Regulation of commercial signage ensures a consistent, physical appearance along the Boulevard • I support this goal (69%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (19%) • I have no opinion (10%) • I have more thoughts to share (1%) Q6 Do you support the following idea? Improve Vehicular Flow at I-69/US-77 by replacing the intersections with innovative solutions, such as a single point urban interchange or roundabouts • Support (60%) • Oppose (please explain below) (21%) • No opinion (6%) • I have more thoughts to share (13%) Q7 Do you support the following idea? Address safety hazards by investing in traffic calming infrastructure, like raised crosswalks, curb extensions ("bump-outs"), and roundabouts. • Support (67%) • Oppose (please explain below) (17%) • No opinion (7%) • I have more thoughts to share (8%) Q8 Do you support the following idea? Build active infrastructure, including sidewalks, safe crossings, and walking and biking trails. • Support (78%) • Oppose (please explain below) (10%) • No opinion (5%) • I have more thoughts to share (8%) Q9 Do you support the following idea? Coordinate with Calallen ISD to mitigate school traffic, including one-way drop-off and pickups, closing u-turns during special events, and organizing walking school buses. • Support (82%) • Oppose (please explain below) (5%) • No opinion (9%) • I have more thoughts to share (4%) Q13 Please tell us how much you support or oppose the following small business support strategies Provide grants or low/no-interest loans to physically adapt brick and mortar stores • Strongly oppose (7%) • Somewhat oppose (5%) • Neither support nor oppose (15%) • Somewhat support (27%) • Strongly support (46%) Allow outdoor operations in parking spaces • Strongly oppose (10%) • Somewhat oppose (13%) • Neither support nor oppose (17%) • Somewhat support (31%) • Strongly support (30%) Collaborate with business owners to transform vacant properties/storefronts into entrepreneurship incubators spaces 92 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 93 January 2021 January 2021 • Strongly oppose (3%) • Somewhat oppose (2%) • Neither support nor oppose (10%) • Somewhat support (33%) • Strongly support (52%) Create new marketing opportunities for area businesses ("shop local" discounts, regular small business "festival" events, etc.) • Strongly oppose (2%) • Somewhat oppose (3%) • Neither support nor oppose (8%) • Somewhat support (23%) • Strongly support (64%) Create a Public Improvement District that raises tax revenue for local improvements • Strongly oppose (14%) • Somewhat oppose (14%) • Neither support nor oppose (19%) • Somewhat support (26%) • Strongly support (27%) Consider project-based Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for commercial affordability and infrastructure • Strongly oppose (8%) • Somewhat oppose (15%) • Neither support nor oppose (24%) • Somewhat support (28%) • Strongly support (25%) Q14 Do you support the street redesign option for Northwest Boulevard at I-69? • Support (76%) • Oppose (please specify below) (8%) • No opinion (5%) • I have more thoughts to share (10%) Q15 Do you support the street redesign options for Northwest Boulevard at River Hill Drive? • Support (73%) • Oppose (please specify below) (9%) • No opinion (10%) • I have more thoughts to share (8%) Q16 Which proposed street redesign option for Northwest Boulevard at Riverside Boulevard do you support? • Option 1 - Expand to six lanes and add sidewalk/sidepath (15%) • Option 1B - Expand to six lanes with shoulders, and add sidewalk/sidepath (36%) • Option 1C - Expand to six lanes with shoulders, but reduce lane widths, and add sidewalk/sidepath (16%) • Option 2 - Improve with sidewalks/paths, but keep to four lanes (22%) • Keep as is (3%) • No opinion (6%) • Other (please specify) (1%) Q17 Which roadway median treatments do you support? • I support the Ornamental median treatment to beautify the street (18%) • I support the Shade median treatment to beautify and cool the street (44%) • I support the Limited median treatment to preserve any landscaping budget for trees along the sidewalk/sidepath (28%) • I do not support any median treatments (5%) • I have other ideas (5%) Q18 Do you support the ideas for Public Art? • I support the proposed public art ideas (51%) • The public art ideas need improvement (specify below) (16%) • I have no opinion (22%) • I have other ideas (12%) Q19 Do you support the idea of building gateway entrances to the study area? • I support community gateway entrances (40%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (12%) • I have no opinion (35%) • I have other ideas (14%) Q20 Do you support the ideas for unique street signage? • I support the proposed street signs (67%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (9%) • I have no opinion (17%) • I have other ideas (7%) Q21 Do you support the ideas for Monument Signage? • I support these monument signage ideas (48%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (15%) • I have no opinion (26%) • I have other ideas (11%) Q22 Do you support the ideas for Street Banners? • I support these street banner ideas (63%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (10%) • I have no opinion (22%) • I have other ideas (6%) Calallen High School Contents Introduction .....................................................2 Development History .....................................................................4 Previous Planning ...........................................................................6 Resident Demographics .............................................................10 Land Use and Market Analysis .......................14 Current Zoning ..............................................................................16 Future Land Use Designations ..................................................17 Housing Stock ...............................................................................18 Businesses.....................................................................................18 Retail Market Analysis .................................................................20 Commercial Characteristics ......................................................22 Land Ownership ............................................................................22 Catalytic Development Sites ......................................................23 Transportation Analysis .................................26 Traffic Volumes .............................................................................26 Transit .............................................................................................28 Traffic Safety .................................................................................30 Roadway Geometry .....................................................................33 Pedestrian and Bicycling Infrastructure ..................................35 Assessment of Opportunities June 2020 96 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 1 January 2021 January 2021 This Assessment of Opportunities report summarizes key findings from a review of existing demographic, land use, and economic conditions and recent trends. Among the noteworthy takeaways are: 1. Study area residents enjoy higher incomes and longevity than the average Corpus Christi resident.....................................................................................................................12 The median household income for the study area is between $75,000 to $99,999, much higher than the median household income for Corpus Christi, which is $55,709. The average life expectancy for the census tracts in the study area is 80.5 years, 2.5 years higher than that of Nueces county and 1.7 years higher than that of Texas. 2. The study area is home to approximately 140 businesses and 1,450 employees....18 Businesses serving regional demand include banks, big box retail like Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center, fast food restaurants, restaurant chains, and medical facilities. Restaurants and schools employ the most workers: 2005 and 200, respectively. 3. Residents spend over $120 million annually on groceries, general merchandise, clothing, and health and personal care outside the primary trade area...................20 The current supply of grocery stores could double in number or size to meet just resident demand within the trade area. Residents currently spend over $50 million on groceries outside the trade area. 4. The study area contains 1.5 million square feet of vacant land zoned for commercial uses .................................................................................................................22 Commercial parcels vary largely in size. The majority of commercial properties range between 20,000 and 60,000 square feet.A handful of landowners in the area own 56% of the available vacant land ripe for development, or 29% of the entire study area. KEY TAKEWAYS 5. Traffic volumes along Northwest Boulevard are similar in 2018 to those traffic volumes collected in 1999..................................................................................................24 A steady, incremental increase of traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard is expected based on the 20 year Average Annual Daily Trip (AADT) trends. 6. Three fatal collisions in the corridor between 2018 and 2019 resulted in the death of one cyclist and two pedestrians...................................................................................28 Every pedestrian-vehicle collision occurred near an intersection (River Trail Drive, FM 1889, and Interstate 69E). 7. No sidewalks are present for most of the length of Northwest Boulevard........................35 Sidewalks are present directly along Northwest Boulevard on the northside between Calallen High School campus and Interstate 69E and on the southside between Wildcat Drive and Interstate 69E 8. The 2018 Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility recommends a cycletrack on either side of Northwest Boulevard...................................................................38 Located between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive, this facility would connect the Wood River neighborhood to the intersection with Highway 77. 2 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 January 2021 January 2021 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces River37 69 358 181 Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay Wood River Elementary School Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D rWood River DrStudy area Parks and open space Schools Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 1: Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park 0 1 2 4 mi Buildings Parcels Introduction Thanks in part to a surge of industrial development in the Corpus Christi metropolitan area in recent years, the Calallen area of far-northwest Corpus Christi has experienced new development. From oil refining and transportation to steel production, the expansion in these export industries is bringing wealth and job opportunities to the region. With this investment comes development pressure and demand grows for new homes, retailers and services. The City of Corpus Christi anticipates additional residential and commercial development, as well as a new elementary school, in the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor, shown below. Plans to build a new steel factory in Sinton, if realized, could drive additional demand for new housing and commerce in Calallen. While new development creates new opportunities for people to live, work and do business in Calallen, it also brings new challenges, such as more auto traffic, and more demands on critical infrastructure. This planning study represents the City of Corpus Christi’s effort to proactively plan for orderly, attractive and sustainable growth and development consistent with the community’s vision. The Northwest Boulevard Corridor lies 20 miles upriver from downtown Corpus Christi. The study area comprises a 500-foot buffer to the north and to the south from Interstate 69 to Wright Moravek Road (County Road 73) - nearly three miles. The Nueces River bounds adjacent neighborhoods to the north, while Interstate 69 presents a physical barrier to the east. To the west and south, development quickly transitions from suburban to rural conditions. The Wood River neighborhood is north of the corridor, and major anchors include one preschool, two elementary schools, one high school, River Hills Country Club, Hazel Bazemore Park, Corpus Christi Medical Center, and retail destinations including Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center. 4 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 5 January 2021 January 2021 Development History The Town of Calallen was established in 1910 where the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico railroad crossed the Nueces River, and grew into a center for agricultural trade.1 The initial settlement was located to the northeast of the Northwest Boulevard study area, between what is today Interstate 37 and the Nueces River. 1 Calallen Independent School District, History of Calallen, Accessed 20 April 2020, Available at: https://www. calallen.org/domain/88. Study area Annexation Periods 1960s 1970s Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 2: Annexation and Development History 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft 1950 1979 1995 1985 2017 1980s 1990s 2000s The City of Corpus Christi annexed this area in the 1960s, and annexed the majority of the Northwest Boulevard study area in the 1980s and 1990s. Urban development coincided with annexation; its peak development was in the 1980s and 1990s, though many current structures were built prior to annexation. Satellite image source: Google Earth 6 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 January 2021 January 2021 Previous Planning As a primary artery serving mutliple institutional uses in Corpus Christi's northwest, Northwest Blvd. has been subject to numerous citywide, comprehensive, and long- range planning efforts. They focus on the function of the roadway, and emphasize the safe balance of user modes, particularly east of FM 1889. Plan Major Goals Relation to this effort Implementation Details Bicycle Mobility Plan, CCMPO, 2018 This plan is Phase I of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility under the CCMPO. The major vision goals are 1) develop a cohesive, strategic network of bicycle facilies that accommodates a diversity of riders 2) Increase the percentage of trips of all types that are made by bicycle 3) Promote health and wellness through bicycling and 4) Enhance safety for bicyclists. The plan methods included developing a community hotspot analysis to determine demand that was then used for bicycle route selection via network analyst reflecting community preferences: 1) Off-road trail connections were prioritized over routes that followed the street network 2) neighborhood streets and minor collectors were prioritized over busier roadways and 3) streets that pass through areas adjacent to activity centers were prioritized over streets that run right through the heart of an activity center or through areas with a very low concentration of destinations. Once presented and “tested” with the community for feedback, specific bicycle infrastructure treatments and facilities were then identified. As Phase 1 of the Mobility Plan, the Bicycle Mobility identifies street segments for bikeway infrastructure and details what types of bicycle facilities are recommended for each street segment. Community engagement informed detailed mapping analyses to select routes and suggest corresponding facility recommendations matching stakeholder preferences. This plan recommendations bicycle infrastructure along Northwest Boulevard between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive in the form of protected cycletracks on either side of the boulevard located outside of the vehicular traffic lanes. Transit Plan 20/20, Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, 2016 A Five-Year Service Plan was developed based on the existing conditions report findings and community engagement activities, including surveys, according to the following themes: upgrades to southside services, more frequent service on Leopard and Port, expanded Sunday service, more direct westside service, Downtown/North Beach route improvements, increased direct routing and frequency in Robstown, consolidated Port Aransas service, expanded Express service, and improved speed and reliability, which are organized within the report according to service types and are divided into two implementation phases. Recommended improvements address service design (i.e. direct routing, route alignment, route deviations, schedule simplicity), established performance metrics (i.e. ridership productivity, passenger loads, schedule reliability, schedule efficiency), and bus stops (i.e. accessibility, amenities, real time arrival information, etc). Transit Plan 20/20 includes recommendations to improve current service after comprehensively analyzing the strengths of the system and identifying gaps in service. The plan includes recommendations that directly impact Northwest Boulevard. Transit Plan 20/20 includes recommended improvements to Route 27, a portion of which operates along Northwest Boulevard within the study area corridor. The plan recommends rerouting Route 27 from the I-69 Access Road after looping around the Five Points Shopping Center to Northwest Boulevard before turning south onto FM 1889. The reroute will likely create additional bus stops along Northwest Boulevard and FM 1889, requiring pedestrian infrastructure to connect these potential bus stops to the existing sidewalk network. 8 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 9 January 2021 January 2021 Plan Major Goals Relation to this effort Implementation Details Mobility CC, City of Corpus Christi, 2013 Of the eight policies the plan establishes, the following are relevant to the Northwest Boulevard Study Area: Policy 1: Integrate street infrastructure that provides balanced transportation options and design features into street design and construction to create safe and inviting environments for all users to walk, bicycle, and use public transportation. Policy 3: Plan and develop a comprehensive and convenient bicycle and pedestrian transportation network. Policy 6: Provide children with safe and appealing opportunities for walking and bicycling to school in order to decrease rush-hour traffic, and fossil fuel consumption, encourage exercise and healthy living habits in children, and reduce the risk of injury to children through traffic collisions near school. Policy 7: Create safe routes to parks and open spaces. This document is the transportation element of the city’s Comprehensive plan. It guides decision-making pertaining to the planning, design, operation and mainenance of the city’s transportation networks. It “houses all transportation related plans, including the City’s Thoroughfare Plan, Trails Master Plan, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Master Plan (formerly the ADA transition plan), plans for the installation of roundabouts and road diets at select locations, and plans for specific street corridors.” The Urban Transportation Plan establishes roadway classifications for the city’s streets, broadly categorized into Local Access Streets, Collectors, Arterials, and Freeways. The UTP identifies Northwest Boulevard as an “A3 Primary - Arterial Divided” urban street, indicating a 130’-wide right-of-way, up to 6 lanes of traffic, 17.5’ of distance between curb and property line, and 30,000 to 48,000 maximum average daily trips. HikeBikeCC recommends 10.26 miles of on-street and off-street facilities to comprise the Nueces River Trail, which would connect Northwest Boulvard to the river via Trinity River Drive, River Walk Drive, and a drainage corridor through the Wood River subdivision, and eastward along the river’s south bank to Labonte Park. Northwest Area Development Plan, City of Corpus Christi, 2001 Relevant Policy Statements: A) Environment. (A1): Maintain and/or improve water quality in the Nueces River - The river provides 2/3 of the City’s drinking water supply. B) Land Use. (B1e): The expansion of business uses along Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) or any other arterial street should be planned and zoned so that the traffic carrying capacity of the street is protected. West of County Road 75, commercial uses on Northwest Boulevard should only be allowed at arterial intersections. (B3): Encourage development of recreational vehicle parks in the northwest area to capture “Winter Texans” traveling U.S. 77 (IH- 69). (B5): Development along all arterial and expressways will be required to plant street trees on fifty-foot centers in a tree planting zone located within 10 feet of any property line abutting the street rights-of-way. C) Annexation. (C1): Pursue annexation of property in advance of development, particularly, along major roadways for the purpose of creating compatible land use and development patterns. (C2): Prior to annexation, develop detailed assessments of infrastructure and action plans for improving and or replacing inadequate infrastructure in outlying substandard developments. (C3): The City should aggressively pursue annexation of the developing areas within the Nueces River watershed within Nueces County. D) Transportation. (D1a): Relief of traffic congestion along Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and at the Five Points Intersection is a major focus of the plan recommendations. E) Public Services. (E3): Create a Nueces River Hike and Bike Trail system with connections to the Oso Parkway system, and schools, parks and other public facilities in the Northwest Area. The Northwest Area Development Plan componnent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan illustrates the decades- long attempt to guide transportation and land use development in an orderly manner that enhances quality of life. Specifically, it names mobility improvements around Northwest Boulevard designed to mitigate congestion of its eastern terminus at the “Five Points Intersection.” Several of these improvements remain to be funded and constructed. This plan also indicated the community's desire to improve the appearance of Northwest Boulevard through three plantings. PS D1 Recommendation a1: “Northwest Boulevard is recommended as an arterial street with an ultimate 120’ minimum right-of-way, six traffic lanes, and a median.” PS D1 Recommendation a2: “A two-lane 60-foot right-of-way loop collector street (south of Wal-Mart) is proposed between U.S. 77 and the extension of River East Drive.” PS D1 Recommendation a3: “County Road 52 is recommended as an arterial street with an ultimate 100’ minimum right-of-way, four travel lanes and a landscaped median.” 10 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 11 January 2021 January 2021 Study area Study area block groups Estate residential Low-density residential Medium-density residential Mobile home Parks and open space Water Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 4: Adjacent Residential Areas, by Census Block Group 0 0.75 1.5 3 mi 69 37 37 44 4469 Northwest Blvd FM624 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 58.023 Resident Demographics An estimated 11,000 people reside in the five Census Block Groups adjacent to the study area, as of 2019.2 This is an 8.3% increase since 2010, nearly 1% per year - just under the city's rate of 9.8%. Population growth ranged from 6.3% to 13.8% among the Block Groups to the north, west, and south of the study area, while it declined 3.1% in the neighborhood east of I-69. The median age group of residents is between 35 and 44, but residents ages 55 and over roughly make up almost a third (32.3%) of the study area population. Comparatively, in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, and Texas, residents ages 55+ only make up about a quarter of their population (27.7%, 28.1%, and 24.7%, respectively). The percent of households with children is slightly higher than the county average (43% and 36%, respectively).3 2 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. 3 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. Figure 3: Population change by Censu Block Groups Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 15%3%6%9%12%-3% -3.1% 10.0% 13.8% 6.3% 9.7% The study area contains two nursing homes, each with 120 beds: the Windsor Calallen Nursing Home and River Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation. Almost 8 in 10 residents (78.6%) live in family households compared to non-family households (21.5%) at rates higher to those of the county and state, where 68.1% of the population live in family households in Nueces and 69.6% in Texas.4 4 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. 12 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 13 January 2021 January 2021 The study area is composed of predominantly white residents (90.0%), of whom almost half identify with Hispanic origin (46.6%).5 The median household income for the study area is $87,253, much higher than the median household income for Corpus Christi, which is $53,614. The average life expectancy for the census tracts in the study area is 80.5 years, 2.5 years higher than that of Nueces county and 1.7 years higher than that of Texas6, suggesting that residents have relatively high access to public health resources. The study area is majority homeowners (79%), and has a slightly higher percentage of homeowners compared to the city (70%). Since 2010, homeownership has decreased by about 3% within the study area and citywide, likely due to increases in multi-family development7. 5 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. 6 National Center for Health Statistics. U.S. Small- Area Life Expectancy Estimates Project, 2010-2015]. National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. Available from: https:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/usaleep/usaleep.html. 7 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. 20%40%60%80%100% Renter Owner Five Block Groups Corpus Christi 78.7%21.3% 56.6%43.4% Figure 7: Tenure Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. Source: Calallen ISD Calallen High School, home of the Wildcats, serves 1,256 students in grades 9-12. The school is located on Northwest Boulevard, close to the I-69 intersection. Figure 6: Household income in the past 12 months (in 2018 inflation-adjusted dollars) 20%40%60%80%100% 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 Corpus Christi Less than $15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,00 - $149,999 $150,000 or more Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. Figure 5: Household types 20%40%60%80%100% 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 Corpus Christi Nueces County Texas Family households Non-family households Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. 14 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 15 January 2021 January 2021 Existing Land Use The map in Figure 8 shows existing land uses within the study area as determined for the 2016 Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. The study area contains a wide variety of land uses, including agriculture, low- to medium- density residential, commercial, as well as many currently vacant lands. Several civic uses such as schools, colleges, and parks also reside within the study area. Land Use and Market Analysis The breadth of land uses indicate the importance of the study area across a variety of stakeholders in addition to the challenges of creating an attractive and unified corridor that accomplishes the collective vision of the City. The study area and adjacent neighborhoods have large parcels of land not fully developed; which are currently zoned as Farm Rural, Multifamily, Neighborhood Commercial, or General Commercial.8 8 City of Corpus Christi Zoning Shapefile City limits Agriculture (1 unit/ 5 acres) Drainage corridor Estate residential (1 unit/ 1 acre) Low-density residential (up to 8 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (8-22 units/ 1 acre) Mobile home Professional office Commercial Light industrial Park and open space Public and semi-public Vacant Future development Buildings Water 100-year floodplain 500-year floodplain Figure 8: Existing Land Use Map 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverWood River Elementary School Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D rWood River DrSource: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park Future elementary school Del Mar College Walmart Five Points Shopping Center Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest 16 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 17 January 2021 January 2021 Figure 9: Current Zoning Map Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 10: Future Land Use Map Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 0 2,000 ft02,000 ft Study area Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Farm-Rural Light Industrial Neighborhood Office Multi-family Two-family Single-family Park and open space Water Study area High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Water 69 69 Current Zoning Most of the land fronting Northwest Boulevard is zoned General Commercial, which intends to provide "sufficient space in appropriate locations for all types of commercial and service activity, particularly along arterial streets where a general mixture of such activity now exists."9 Neighborhood Commercial Districts are interspersed among the General Commercial Districts, near the center of the study area. These provide areas for commercial activity such as sale of convenience goods and personal services that primarily benefit nearby residential areas," and are usually have pedestrian access from nearby residential neighborhoods.10 9 City of Corpus Christi Unified Development Code, Section 4.5.1.D. 10 Ibid., Section 4.5.1.A. A significant amount of land within the study area and adjacent to the south and west is zoned Farm- Rural, which is intended for land that is "relatively underdeveloped and agricultural in nature." It is also "the default zoning district for land newly-annexed to the City," and therefore subject to reclassification for appropriate uses.11 Beyond the study area itself, most adjacent neighborhood zoning is for residential uses - largely for single family homes, but also including some multi-family classified parcels. 11 Ibid., Section 4.3.1.A. Future Land Use Designations PlanCC, the City's comprehensive plan, establishes a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to guide development and redevelopment for the next twenty years. It is not a zoning map, but rather a guide for decision-makers charged with making rulings on zoning and land use issues. The vision of future development in the Northwest Boulevard Corridor codified in FLUM is for a mix of uses largely anchored by commercial uses. Government close to the interstate (Calallen High School, Corpus Christi Medical Center Northwest, and Del Mar College) remain in place, while medium density residential comprises a stretch of the southern side of Northwest Boulevard west of FM 1889. A handful of parcels between FM 1889 and County Road 69 do not have FLUM designations. 18 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 19 January 2021 January 2021 Housing Stock The neighborhoods adjacent to the Study Area are primarily single-family residential. These neighborhoods contain mostly single-family detached homes, but also includes multi-family, condos, and the Windsor Calallen Nursing home, which has 120 beds, or 60 rooms. There is one recent multi-family development, the Calallen Apartments, and one planned multi-family development just south of the new Calallen apartments. There is one planned single-family development, called River Ridge Unit 4. South of Northwest Boulevard, this proposed 136 lot development sits north of County Road 52, east of County Road 69, and at the extension of Riverside Boulevard. Businesses The study area is home to approximately 140 businesses and 1,450 employees.12 As a commercial corridor, commercial and retail businesses are located immediately off Northwest Boulevard’s right-of-way, surrounded by residential neighborhoods, and most of the corridor’s businesses are clustered on the east side of the study area, supporting regional demand from Interstate 69. Businesses serving regional demand include banks, big box retail like Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center, fast food restaurants, restaurant chains, and medical facilities. Services and local businesses serving the surrounding neighborhoods include local cafes and restaurants. Restaurants and schools employ the most workers: 2005 and 200, respectively. Despite the high number of jobs in the study area and adjacent neighborhoods (4,934),13 the majority of residents commute elsewhere for employment. Approximately 601 out of 4,558 employed residents live and work within the study area’s adjacent neighborhoods, resulting in 4,333 employees commuting into the study area from other parts of the Corpus Christi area. This daily inflow and outflow has a large impact on traffic, especially during peak travel hours. More traffic analysis will be discussed in the following Transportation Section. 12 Business Analyst. Copyright 2019 Infogroup, Inc. Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2019. 13 OnTheMap, U.S. Census LODES data, 2017 Typology Parcels Land Area Appraised value Single-family 360 83.3%78.4% Mobile homes 6 2.4%0.2% Condominiums 8 1.7%1.2% Multi-family 2 5.7%11.8% Two-family 1 0.2%0.2% Four- or more-family 1 0.4%0.4% Townhouses 9 5.4%7.7% Vacant residential land 6 1.0%0.2% Figure 11: Housing typology within 500’ buffer Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. Figure 13: Business Industry and Employees Map Study area No. of Employees 0-10 11-25 26-50 51+ Source: Business Analyst (ESRI 2019); City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft SIC Code Business Industry Number of Businesses Number of Employees Sales Volume Retail (Eating & Drinking Places, Food Stores, General Merchandise Stores, Gas Stations, Apparel & Accessory Stores) 43 606 $162,029,000 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 16 95 $30,107,000 Services (Health Services, Motion Pictures & Amusements, Educational Institutions & Libraries, Automotive Services) 49 539 $93,334,000 Other (Agriculture, Construction, Transportation)31 210 $54,044,000 Figure 14: SIC type and employee count (2019) within 500’ buffer Source: Business Analyst (ESRI 2019) Business Industry Retail (Eating & Drinking Places, Food Stores, General Merchandise Stores, Gas Stations, Apparel & Accessory Stores) Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Services (Health Services, Motion Pictures & Amusements, Educational Institutions & Libraries, Automotive Services) Other (Agriculture, Construction, Transportation) Regional Opportunity (9) k k kk k k Crop out this box in Indesign ¯0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125 Miles CENTENNIAL PARKWAY U p p e r L a s V e g a s W a s h T r a i l E DEER SPRINGS WAY BRUCE WOODBURY BELTWAY VA Healthcare System Job Creation ZoneHigh School YMCA Elementary Schools Elementary School Elementary School Middle and Elementary School Middle SchoolPark N COMMERCE STWALNUT RD' 601 4,333 3,957 Figure 12: Workers Inflow and Outflow, 2017 Source: OnTheMap U.S Census LODES data, 2017 20 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 21 January 2021 January 2021 Retail Market Analysis Approximately 60,000 people live within a 15-minute driving distance of the center of the Northwest Boulevard study area, which encompasses the towns of Odem and Edroy to the north, Robstown to the south, and neighborhoods adjacent to the Leopard Street corridor eastward to US Highway 358. Households within this "primary trade area" had an estimated median disposable income of $47,543 and total disposable income of $1.28 billion in 2019. The population grew by over 5,000 since 2010 - an annual rate of about 1%. At this rate, the population will grow by about 2,900 by 202414. While the study area offers many shopping opportunities, analysis of sales by retail category within the primary trade area suggest that residents within the area are leaving it to make purchases. These categories and their leakage amounts are: Food & Beverage Stores: $56.7 million15 This category includes grocery stores of all sizes, specialty food stores, and beer, wine and liquor stores. This figure represents about half of the total resident demand for grocery purchases within the primary trade area, meaning that the current supply of grocery stores could double in number or size to meet just resident demand within the trade area. General merchandise Stores: $30.5 million This category includes "big box" discount stores such as Walmart, smaller "dollar" stores such as Dollar General, and chain pharmacies. Each of these are found on the eastern side of the study area. This represents 28% of overall resident demand, indicating that existing general merchandise stores meet a greater share of demand for their products than grocery stores do. 14 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. 15 Source: Esri and Infogroup. Esri 2019 Updated Demographics. Esri 2017 Retail MarketPlace. Primary Trade Area Figure 15: Primary Trade Area Study area 15-minute drive area Source: Business Analyst. Copyright 2019 Infogroup, Inc. 69 37 37 44 Clothing & Accessories Stores: $19.0 million This includes clothes, shoes, and jewelry. This amount represents two thirds of total resident demand for clothing stores. Thus, while the total leakage value is lower than grocery and general mechandise leakage, this category is comparatively less saturated within the primary trade area. Health and Personal Care Stores: $17.5 million Trade area residents spend $36.5 million on health and personal care stores, but study area retailers sell only $19 million in products and services, which means residents are spending nearly that same amount outside the trade area. Some retail categories within the trade area sell more goods and services than its residents consume. This means people are traveling from outside the trade area to make these purchases, indicating that these sectors are already strong attractors, and do not require recruitment to locate within the study area and meet residents needs. These categories and their suplus sales amounts are: Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers: $139.5 million Sales within this category are twice the demand among trade area residents. The cluster of car dealerships along the US Hwy. 77/I-69 corridorr south of the study area contributes to the large supply of this category within the primary trade area. Gasoline Stations: $27.9 million Trade area residents spend $64.3 million per year at gasoline stations, yet area stations sell $92.2 million. Restaurants: $14.9 million It is common among trade areas that experience high levels of commuters to experience higher restaurant sales than area residents demand. This surplus may be the result of commuters to the area's numerous employment centers, such as schools and the medical center, going out for lunch or dinner. Above: Retailers at the Five Points Shopping Center located near I-67 offer a mix of clothing, general merchandise, and home goods and crafts. Source: Google Streetview, August 2015 Below: A neighborhood retail strip shopping center featuring a new Starbucks location recently opened at County Road 69. Source: Google Streetview, April 2019 22 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 23 January 2021 January 2021 Commercial Characteristics The study area has large parcels not fully developed; roughly 1.5 million square feet is vacant parcels zoned commercial (General Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, and Neighborhood Office). Commercial parcels vary largely in size. The majority of commercial properties range between 20,000 and 60,000 square feet. Catalytic Development Sites Catalytic development sites, indicated on the following page, are located where development can fulfill city and corridor goals, including job creation, improved transportation and access, or new housing units. A common issue that complicates development within this corridor is the location of oil and gas pipelines. Some pipelines are abandoned, but others remain active. The unreliability of survey data adds risk and cost to upcoming development. A high level review of the following attributes were considered in the analysis of land for catalytic development viability: • Existing zoning • Proximity to higher traffic volumes • Adjacent to development for cost-effective utilization of existing utilities • Size of site • Adjacency to Northwest Boulevard Figure 16: Vacant commercial parcel zoningPercent of Land within 500’ buffer General Commercial 39.2% Neighborhood Comercial 45.5% Neighborhood Office 13.3% Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. All other land 71% Public/ institutional 10% AI Development Inc. 7% Lontos Katherin 6% Robertson Kevin E ET UX 5% Figure 17: Major ownershipPercent of Land within 500’ buffer Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. Land Ownership Given its large amount of vacant land, the study area is well-positioned to contribute to the city’s economic development through the development of a live-work environment. A handful of landowners in the area own 56% of the available vacant land ripe for development, or 29% of the entire study area. 10% of the study area is owned by the City and the Callalan ISD, and those properties are already developed or have development plans in place. 24 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 25 January 2021 January 2021 Figure 18: Redevelopment Map Map Key Likelihood to Change Zoning Future Land Use Acreage Traffic Volume 1 High CN-2 “Neighborhood Commercial”Commercial 8.907 32,502 2 Very High FR “Farm Rural”Mixed Use 10 32,502 3 Very High FR “Farm Rural”Mixed Use 5 32,502 4 Moderate CN-1 Neighborhood Commercial N/A 3.95 23,361 5 Moderate CN-1 Neighborhood Commercial N/A 4.22 23,361 Figure 19: Catalytic development sites Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. 2 1 3 5 4 2 1 3 5 4 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverWood River Elementary School Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D rWood River Dr0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park Study area Parcels Vacant Commercial Parcels In platting/construction process Catalytic Development Sites Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Ownership Lontos Katherine Al Development Inc Robertson Kevin E ET UX Public/ Institutional Future HEB grocery Future apartments Future elementary school The Lakes at Northwest Restaurants Office Office and Small Retail 26 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 27 January 2021 January 2021 Transportation Analysis Traffic Volumes The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes for vehicles in the Northwest Boulevard study area in 2018 are illustrated in the map on the following page. Moving eastward along Northwest Boulevard from County Road 73 to its eastern terminus at Interstate I-69, the AADT ranges from 23,361 to 33,512 auto vehicles each day utilizing the corridor. Auto traffic volumes are higher in the eastern portion of the study area, as expected, given the proximity to Interstate I-69 and concentration of intense land uses. Two traffic count locations (E and F on Figure 20) located along Interstate 69 have traffic volumes between 45,000 and 62,000 vehicles. Traffic volumes on roads terminating onto Northwest Boulevard are lower; fewer than 10,000 vehicles currently travel on FM 1889 daily. A 20-year trend analysis for the traffic count locations in the study area indicates that the daily traffic volumes along Northwest Boulevard are similar in 2018 to those traffic volumes collected in 1999. FM 1889 has experienced the most stable traffic volumes during this 20-year period, with traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard fluctuating by as much as 10,000 vehicles per day between the highest and lowest traffic volume counts. Beginning in 2007 at the start of the Great Recession, traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard declined before starting to grow again in 2010; in 2018 traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard were similar to 2007 volumes. Traffic volumes have fluctuated widely along Interstate 69 in the study area, with traffic volumes doubling from 30,000 to over 60,000 between 2013 and 2018. Much of this fluctuation is a direct result of construction-related impacts on Interstate 69. Pedestrians and cyclists are not included in this count; the Figure 20: 20-Year AADT Trends for Study Area Count Locations 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 19992018200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017Count Location A Count Location B Count Location C Count Location D Count Location E Count Location F Figure 21: Average Annual Daily Traffic Counts, 2018 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft C D E FA B Source: Texas Department of Transportation GIS Services Study area Count Location A - 6,026 Count Location B- 23,361 Count Location C - 32,502 Count Location D - 33,512 Count Location E - 45,751 Count Location F - 62,090 Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan includes case studies of cities that have conducted bicycle counts and recommends bicycle counts be conducted for performance measures. A steady, incremental increase of traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard was expected based on the 20 year AADT trends. However, taking the evidence of the decline of traffic in the Great Recession, it is unclear how the COVID 19 crisis will impact long term trends on the corridor. Land use changes that are expected to contribute to the increase of traffic volumes include the construction of restaurants and limited retail in the western half of the study area at County Roads 73 and 69, in addition to a residential development west of FM 1889. The possible construction of a new H-E-B store at FM 1889 and Northwest Boulevard would likely increase traffic volumes along both segments. Although there is no bicycle or pedestrian count data available for this segment of Northwest Boulevard, newer residential and retail and restaurant uses will likely increase demand for biking and walking facilities in the study area. Students living in the recently completed Calallen Apartments at FM 1889 and future students living in The Lakes at Northwest subdivision under construction will need safe infrastructure for both traveling along Northwest Boulevard and crossing the five-lane roadway to access area schools on foot or by bike. 28 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 29 January 2021 January 2021 Transit The Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Agency (CCRTA) operates one local fixed bus route, Route 27, serving a portion of Northwest Boulevard. Route 27, the second longest route in the CCRTA system,16 runs from downtown Corpus Christi westward along Leopard Street and then south along the I-69 Access Road/US-77 to Robstown multiple times daily. Route 27 also operates in tandem with two Parks and Recreation services. One Park- and-Ride at the Robstown Transfer Station in Robstown, located at Avenue A and 4th Street, has a maximum 16 Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Transit Plan 20/20, 2016. Figure 22: Bus Stops and Bus Routes 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ftSource: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Source: Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Transit Plan 20/20, 2016. Study area Bus Stop Route 27 (existing) Route 27 (proposed) Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Figure 23: Recommended Route 27 Reroutecapacity of 33 parking spaces. The second Park-and-Ride in Annaville is located between IH-37 and Leopard Street immediately west of the Rehfeld Road intersection with a maximum capacity of 75 parking spaces. Both the southbound or outbound trips and the north bound or inbound trips northbound and southbound routes create a short loop around the Five Points Shopping Center, which experiences high ridership, utilizing Northwest Boulevard, Wildcat Drive, and Teague Lane. Five bus stops serving Route 27 are within the study area boundaries, with one bus stop directly along Northwest Boulevard just east of Wildcat Drive. One of the reasons why ridership is high on this route along this segment is because Route 27 maintains the same schedule and route alignment on the weekends instead of consolidating the route or operating across a shorter window of service. The CCRTA Transit Plan 20/20 recommends changes to the Route 27 alignment to “serve additional commercial development along FM 624."17 The suggested reroute will 17 Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Transit Plan 20/20, 2016. 30 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 31 January 2021 January 2021 continue west along Northwest Boulevard and turn on to FM 1889 to reach Robstown Station, rather than by travelling on US Highway 77. Findings from interviews conducted with bus operators as part of the Transit Plan 20/20 indicated that there may be pent up demand for Route 27, especially on weekend mornings,as evidenced by standing-room only conditions. Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 7337 69 358 181 Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrStudy area Fatal Crash Suspected Serious Injury Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 24: Crash Locations and Injury Severity, 2018 - 2019 0 1 2 4 mi Non-Incapacitating Injury Possible Injury No Injury Unknown Severity 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Traffic Safety Between 2018 and 2019, there were 272 collisions in the study area corridor involving 579 parties. These crashes resulted in 3 deaths, 4 suspected serious injuries, 12 crashes with non-incapacitating injuries, 60 crashes involving possible injury, 188 collisions in which no one was injured, and 5 collisions with unknown severity. Mapping the locations of the collisions shows that the vast majority of crashes in the study corridor occur east of Wildcat Drive along Northwest Boulevard and along I-69. When overlayed the curb cut locations shown in Figure 29, the locations of these crashes correspond 32 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 33 January 2021 January 2021 with the locations of driveways to the commercial and institutional parcels along Northwest Boulevard. A survey of corridor images shows that nearly every curb cut, or driveway, lacks any directional signage in the form of posted stop signs or painted stop bars for motorists, indicating that drivers may not be yielding ample right-of- way time before making turning movements. Of these 272 incidents, 266 or 98% of collisions involved only motor vehicles. There was one bike-related and four pedestrian-related collisions with motor vehicles along Northwest Boulevard, with an additional “no contact” collision listed in the crash report data. While the overall number of collisions involving both motor vehicles and people biking and walking were low, these were among the deadliest collisions. The three fatal collisions in the corridor between 2018 and 2019 resulted in the death of one cyclist and two pedestrians. The remaining two pedestrian-vehicle collisions in the corridor during this time period resulted in non-incapacitating injuries. Every pedestrian-vehicle collision occurred near an intersection (River Trail Drive, FM 1889, and Interstate 69E), with the former two pedestrian-vehicle collisions at unsignalized intersections and the latter two pedestrian- vehicle collisions at signalized intersections with marked crosswalks. The crash report data notes from police reports cited that the contributing factor in every pedestrian-vehicle crash was the “pedestrian [failure] to yield right of way to vehicle,” indicating that safer, formalized pedestrian crossings of Northwest Boulevard are needed for pedestrians since 50% of these collisions resulted in the death of pedestrians. The presence of sidewalks and traffic signals is discussed below under “Pedestrian and Bicycling Infrastructure.” There was no contributing factor listed in the police report for the bicycle-vehicle collision, although the driver was reported as “going straight” along Northwest Boulevard. News reports of the bicyclist fatality describe the incident as a hit-and-run since the driver did not stop; the 30-year- old victim was traveling south on Northwest Boulevard before being struck at approximately 7:00 a.m. on a weekday morning18. With a posted speed limit of 50 miles 18 ABC News, Kiii TV South Texas, CCPD identify Figure 25: Northwest Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ftSource: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Study area Fatal Crash Non-Incapacitating Injury Bicycle Collision Pedestrian Collision Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels per hour and traffic volume exceeding 30,000 vehicles daily, any recommended bikeway for this corridor will be either separated or off-street for maximum user safety. Existing bikeway conditions are discussed below under “Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure.” Roadway Geometry Between CR 73 and River Hill Drive (a 1.5 mile length), Northwest Boulevard is 5 lanes across with two driving lanes in each direction, a center turning lane, and a wide shoulder on either side. Between River Hill Drive and Wildcat Drive (1 mile length), Northwest Boulevard retains two driving lanes in each direction, with the center turning lane punctuated by medians to protect left-turning drivers from oncoming traffic. East of Wildcat Drive (0.3 mile length), Northwest Boulevard expands to three driving lanes in each direction with a median-protected center turn lane. At the intersection with Interstate 69E, there are three westbound driving lanes and the eastbound traffic is divided between one left-turn only lane, a shared left-turn and through lane, a through lane only, and a right-turn only lane. body found along FM 624 in northwest Corpus Christi, July 24,2019. Accessed April 15, 2020. Figure 26: Northwest Boulevard from CR 73 to River Hill Drive 34 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 35 January 2021 January 2021 Figure 27: Northwest Boulevard at Riverside Boulevard Figure 28: Northwest Boulevard at Interstate 69E Access Road Pedestrian and Bicycling Infrastructure No sidewalks are present for most of the length of Northwest Boulevard in the study area. Sidewalks are present directly along Northwest Boulevard on the northside between Calallen High School campus and Interstate 69E and on the southside between Wildcat Drive and Interstate 69E. The sidewalk on Calallen High School campus is approximately six feet wide and separated from auto traffic by a drainage ditch. This segment is the only sidewalk in the study area corridor along Northwest Boulevard that has any shade and this limited shade is provided by the canopy of trees planted on campus. East of Wildcat Drive, the existing sidewalks are immediately adjacent to the roadway with no landscaping or vegetative buffer between pedestrians and vehicles. These sidewalks are approximately six feet wide and cross at least half a dozen driveways on each side of Northwest Boulevard with no crosswalk markings, painted stop bars, or stops signs for any of these driveways with the exception of Chick-fil-A, which has a painted stop bar and stop sign at its driveway. Residential sidewalks are present in the subdivided neighborhood areas immediately adjacent school campuses,The Lakes at Northwest on FM 1889 south Northwest Boulevard, and the neighborhood south of Northwest Boulevard and Calallen High School. There is generally shade provided by trees along these sidewalks except for The Lakes at Northwest since this is a newer subdivision replanted with younger, smaller trees. However, there is no direct pedestrian connection between the neighborhood surrounding Wood River Elementary School and the neighborhood adjacent Calallen High School. Older students residing in the Wood River neighborhood have no formalized pedestrian connection to Calallen High School, which is approximately one mile away for about half of the neighborhood. Eight signalized intersections are within the study area: at Interstate 69E, Wildcat Drive, River East Drive, FM 69, River Hill Drive, FM 1889/Trinity River Drive, Wood River Drive, and CR 73. Marked crosswalks serve pedestrians in all directions at the Northwest Boulevard intersections with Wildcat Drive, River East Drive, and CR 69. At the River Hill Drive, a marked crosswalk serves pedestrians crossing River Hill Drive on the north side of the intersection. At the Trinity River Drive/FM 1889 intersection, crosswalks are marked across Northwest Boulevard on the west side of the intersection and across Trinity River Drive. The intersections of Northwest Boulevard at CR 73 or at Wood River Drive do not provide any marked crosswalks. While people may ride bikes on Northwest Boulevard’s 36 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 37 January 2021 January 2021 Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrStudy area Mobility CC recommended off-street bikeways Mobility CC recommended on-street bikeways Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility recommended off-street facilities Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility recommended off-street facilities Existing sidewalks Figure 29: Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Driveway Signalized Intersection Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park 38 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor PlanNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 39 January 2021 January 2021 shoulders west of River E Drive, no formal bicycling facilities are available throughout the study area. The 2018 Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility recommends a cycletrack on either side of Northwest Boulevard between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive, which would connect the Wood River neighborhood to the Five Points Shopping Center. The 2013 Mobility CC plan from the City’s Comprehensive Figure 30: Recommended Bikeways from the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility Source: CCMPO, Bicycle Mobility Plan. 2018 Figure 31: Proposed Nueces River Hike and Bike Trail Plan also recommends a hike and bike trail along the Nueces River, which has the opportunity to connect to the proposed Phase 1 off-road multi-use trail along the Wood River ditch and/or with the proposed bike boulevard along Northwest Trail in the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility. Although outside the study area corridor, this hike and bike trail could provide a separated bikeway facility as a recreational amenity for study area residents and workers. Source: City of Corpus Christi, Mobility CC Plan, 2013 City of Corpus ChristiNorthwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan Draft Report Submitted February 2021 Acknowledgements City Council Mayor Paulette M Guajardo Michael Hunter John Martinez Mike Pusley Billy Lerma Ben Molina Roland Berrera Greg Smith Gil Hernandez Planning Commission Sheldon Schroeder Kamran Zarghouni Michael M Miller Michael York Daniel M Dibble Jeremy Baugh Brian S Mandel Javier O Gonzalez Cynthia S Garza Benjamin Polak, Ex Officio City Staff Steve Viera, Assistant City Manager Peter Zanoni, City Manager Annika Gunning Yankee, Sr. Planner/Project Manager Daniel McGinn, AICP, Director Avery Oltmans, AICP, City Planner Advisory Committee Dr. Arturo Almendarez, Calallen Independent School District Judy Telge, Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living Rose Fernandez, Calallen Apartments Thomas Tiffin, P..E., Wood River Community Association Charles Benavides, P.E., Texas Department of Transportation Craig Casper, AICP, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Gordon Robinson, AICP, Regional Transportation Authority Jack Taylor, Northwest Business Association Mike Pusley, Northwest Business Association Yasmene McDaniel, Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest Angela Rhoden, Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest Juan Pimentel, P.E., Nueces County Public Works Carolyn Vaughn, Nueces County Commissioner Everett Roy, City Councilmember Sarah Munoz, P.E., City of Corpus Christi Public WorksAsakura Robinson Matt Rufo, AICP | Project Manager Zakcq Lockrem, AICP | Principal-in-Charge Brianna Frey, AICP | Deputy Project Manager Hugo ColÓn, Associate AIA | Lead Designer Contents Introduction .....................................................2 Why a Corridor Plan? ....................................................................2 A Public Process .............................................................................3 Vision and Goals ..............................................6 Strategies and Actions .....................................9 Overview ...........................................................................................9 Transportation ..............................................................................14 Land Use, Zoning and Business ................................................22 Streetscape....................................................................................28 Implementation .............................................39 Overview .........................................................................................39 Implementation Matrix ................................................................40 Funding the Plan ...........................................................................45 Appendix .......................................................47 Engagement Summary and Documentation ..........................47 Assessment of Opportunities ....................................................47 2 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 INTRODUCTION Why a Corridor Plan? Thanks in part to a surge of industrial development in the Corpus Christi metropolitan area in recent years, the Calallen area of far-northwest Corpus Christi has experienced new development. From oil refining and transportation to steel production, the expansion in these export industries is bringing wealth and job opportunities to the region. With this investment comes development pressure and demand grows for new homes, retailers and services. The City of Corpus Christi anticipates additional residential and commercial development, as well as a new elementary school, in the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor. Plans to build a new steel factory in Sinton could drive additional demand for new housing and commerce in Calallen. While new development creates new opportunities for people to live, work and do business in Calallen, it also brings new challenges, such as more auto traffic, and more demands on critical infrastructure. The Northwest Boulevard (FM624) Corridor Plan represents the City of Corpus Christi’s effort to proactively plan for orderly, attractive and sustainable growth and development consistent with the community’s vision. The Northwest Boulevard Corridor lies 20 miles upriver from downtown Corpus Christi. The study area comprises a 500-foot buffer to the north and to the south from Interstate 69 to Wright Moravek Road (County Road 73) - nearly three miles. The Nueces River bounds adjacent neighborhoods to the north, while Interstate 69 presents a physical barrier to the east. To the west and south, development quickly transitions from suburban to rural conditions. The Wood River neighborhood is north of the corridor, and major anchors include one preschool, two elementary schools, one high school, River Hills Country Club, Hazel Bazemore Park, Corpus Christi Medical Center, and retail destinations including Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center. 2020 March April May June July August Phase 1: Understand 1 Phase 2: Envision 2 1 Phase 3: Act 3 2 Advisory Committee Meeting Public Input Meeting 2 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 February 2021 A Public Process Meaningful public engagement has been essential to the development of this Plan’s vision and priorities, and the Plan successfully shifted in person engagement online when COVID-19 presented itself in March 2020. Throughout the three-phase planning process - in which the project consulting team first gathered data, facilitated visioning, and refined strategies for implementation - the City of Corpus Christi provided multiple opportunities for the public to express their ideas, hopes, and concerns through numerous channels. These included: • Two online surveys received a combined 590 responses • One online mapping tool to identify issues and assets • Two virtual public meetings • Three Advisory Committee meetings • Multiple social media announcements of surveys and public meetings • Multiple e-newsletter mailings through City of Corpus Christi listservs • Poster advertisements at bus stops within the study area Throughout the planning process, the City and consultants engaged and interviewed numerous Corridor stakeholders, from TxDOT and Calallen High School leadership to developers and land owners. The City also convened an Advisory Committee composed of public agency partners, local business and neighborhood association representatives, and major employers to advise the City staff and consultants on development of the Plan’s strategies and specific recommendations. Through compilation of the ideas, aspirations, and concerns collected, several priorities emerged: Reduce traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard Participants repeatedly stressed the importance that the roads should be more convenient for drivers, particularly by mitigating traffic congestion and improving roadway safety. Preserve and enhance the business and commercial space Participants especially desired more grocery shopping and dining options, especially family-friendly establishments. Many asked for access to businesses to be maintained, and that they want commercial development to continue to front Northwest Boulevard. Enhance beauty and landscaping in the area Respondents desire to improve area aesthetics with proper landscape maintenance. Many desire easy-to- maintain plantings, consistent sign regulations, and to overall improve the attractiveness to visitors. Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety Participants agree the study area’s roads should be safer, more accessible, and convenient for bicyclists and pedestrians. Many observed pedestrians walking along Northwest Boulevard without sidewalks. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 February 2021 4 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019; City of Corpus Christi GIS Services; TXDOT Zoning of Vacant Land Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Farm-Rural Multi-family Single-family Study Area boundary City boundary Existing Land Use High-density residential Low-density residential Estate residential Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Public/Semi-Public Water 6 7 89 Figure 1: Study Area Existing Land Uses and Planned Developments E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River DrWood River Elementary School Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 5 February 2021 0 500 1,000 2,000 ftPlanned Developments 1 2 3 5 4 Northwest BlvdWildcat DrCounty Rd 69Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D rRiver Hill DrMagee Elementary School Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Northwest Park River Hills Country Club Key Proposed/Planned Use Zoning Future Land Use Designation (PlanCC)Plat Status 1 River Ridge Unit 4 RS-6 Single-Family 6 Medium-density residential (4 to 13 units/ acre)Under review 2 Calallen Elementary School RS-6 Single-Family 6 Medium-density Residential (4-13 units/acre)Recorded 3 Office/Neighborhood retail CN-2 Neighborhood Commercial Commercial Pending 4 Urgent care clinic CG-2 General Commercial Mixed Use Recorded 5 Office building CG-2 General Commercial Mixed Use 6 Grocery, neighborhood retail, residential CG-2 General Commercial Mixed Use Recorded 7 “The Lakes at Northwest” 71 single-family homes RS-6 Single-Family 6 Medium-density Residential (4-13 units/acre)Construction 8 West River Place Unit 2 CG-2 General Commercial Medium-density Residential (4-13 units/acre)Approved 9 Mesquiteville restaurant CG-2 General Commercial Commercial Construction 6 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 VISION Hazel Bazemore Park. Source: Flickr user birdybirdbits Northwest Boulevard is Calallen’s “Main Street,” providing the amenities of a prosperous neighborhood center in a small, tight-knit community. The Boulevard is a welcoming, diverse, and family-friendly place where people go to shop, gather, invest in businesses, play and raise a family. Calallen Cats. Source: Callalen ISD National Walk and Bike to School Day. Source: pexels.com Trails for walking, hiking, and biking. Source: Corpus Christi CVB Live, work and play. Source: The Char Atnip Team Mike Cotton's BBQ. Source: Gerald McLeod 6 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard's Future Is: 2) Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses »A variety of neighborhood restaurants and retail outlets offer a diverse array of goods, services, and family-friendly experiences »Businesses can receive support and incentives from public entities to recover from loss of income 3) Healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. »Trees and vegetation provide shade and help drain stormwater »Trails are easily accessible for walking, hiking and biking 4) Attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole »Wastewater, Water, and Storm Water is expanded to areas planned for development »Public art and neighborhood branding convey a sense of place and beautify the public realm »Wayfinding signage draws attention to neighborhood attractions and guides visitors »Regulation of commercial signage ensures a consistent, physical appearance along the Boulevard 1) Safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. »Congestion is less frequent, making it easier for people to get around and navigate the neighborhood »Traffic is calmed, making it safer for people to drive, walk across, and bike along the boulevard »Streets and sidewalks are accessible, and built to ADA standards “Business growth and a diverse population that reside there have made the areas around Northwest Blvd a true melting pot with its own unique sense of pride and character." "This area is the future of Corpus Christi and is the first impression for tourists and visitors coming here. Make it more attractive and accessible so they want to return.” - Survey Respondants Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 February 2021 GOALS STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS Overview The Corridor Plan’s four goals and individual strategies and actions aim to fulfill the Vision by: »Identifying major capital and infrastructure projects along with smaller, incremental program or policy changes. »Leveraging public-sector actions to encourage private sector responses. »Encouraging new development in underutilized areas, while avoiding negative impacts on existing neighborhoods and institutions. Goal 1: Safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. Goal 3: Healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. Goal 2: Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses Goal 4: Attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole Land Use, Zoning, a n d B u s i nessTransportationS t r e e t s cape Strategies and Actions Goals Transportation 1 2 3 4 T1. Reduce congestion at I-69  T2. Improve intersections for safety and mobility  T3. Build active infrastructure along roadways  T4. Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand  Land Use, Zoning and Business 1 2 3 4 L1. Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment  L2. Relax zoning and other city restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID-19  L3. Provide small businesses programs that target long-term impacts of COVID-19  Streetscape 1 2 3 4 S1. Reduce lane widths  S2. Enhance planting areas  S3. Expand and plant medians  S4. Design and install signage and banners  S5: Install Public Art  10 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan10 February 2021 Concept Map Many of the strategies and actions focus on specific locations within the Corridor. The map below indicates these locations and organizes them by goal. Many other strategies and actions apply more broadly to the Corridor overall, and do not appear in this map. The strategy descriptions in the following pages and the Implementation Matrix on page 44 offer additional details about these. Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrE A s Figure 2: Overall Concept Map Active Transportation Enhancements A one-way cycle track is physically separated from the vehicular travel lanes that provides exclusive use by bicycles in the direction of motor vehicle travel (both sides). Off-road shared use trails are wide, raised, behind-the-curb paths that provide space for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel in both directions along the path. Buffered bike lanes are on-street bike lanes with a physical buffer, marked by pavement paint or incorporated vertical elements such as posted bollards, between automobiles and bicyclists. Bike boulevards are on-street bikeways in which bicyclists share space with automobiles on low speed and low trafficked streets. Public Art Opportunity Gateway Public Art Art Attraction u Crosswalk Art S Mural Art Opportunity s SuR Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 11 February 2021 11 Intersection Enhancements A FM 1889 - Ped. countdown signals, crosswalks, curb extns, ped. refuge island, street lighting B CR 69 - Ped. countdown sigs, raised crosswalk, curb extns, ped. refuge island, street lighting C Wildcat Drive - Ped. countdown sigs, raised crosswalk, curb extns, ped. refuge island, st. light D US Hwy 77 - Ped. countdown sigs; high-visibility crosswalks; ped. refuge island, street lighting Traffic Circulation Partnerships E Grocery and Neighborhood retail F Calallen Elementary and High School 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Calallen Elementary School B F DC s u u R S Study area Parks and open space Water Proposed Future Land Use High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft 12 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan12 February 2021 Elements of a Safe, Accessible, and Attractive Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard's wide right-of-way provides ample room for building roadway design elements that improve safety and accessibility for people driving, walking and biking on Calallen’s “Main Street.” The diagram below illustrates how many such features, which are described in detail in the following pages, work together to create a comprehensive, “complete street” that meets the needs of businesses, residents, institutions, and commuters. 2 4 3 1 High Visibility Crosswalks Pedestrian Countdown Signals Pedestrian Refuge Island Pedestrian Lighting and Street Banners Figure 3: Proposed, Model Design for Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 13 February 2021 13 8 5 6 7 9 Sidepath Landscaped Median Reduced lane widths Shade Trees and planting area Curb extensions on cross streets 14 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan14 February 2021 Transportation Strategies T1: Reduce congestion at I-69 Goals: Problem: Reducing congestion along Northwest Boulevard, particularly between Calallen High School and the IH-69 interchange, emerged as the clear top priority among participants in the planning process; 47% of all survey respondents cited traffic flow and congestion as “the one improvement you’d like to see in the Study Area,” and an additional 6% cited traffic light challenges specifically. 80% “strongly agreed” that “roads should be more convenient for auto traffic with less congestion.” People noted that long back-ups accessing the interstate on-ramps form during morning and afternoon peak periods associated with school opening and dismissal times. Solution Several options are available to reduce congestion at the historic “Five Points” intersection of IH-69, Northwest Boulevard, and Leopard Street: reducing traffic demand, expanding interstate throughput capacity, and expanding surface street throughput capacity. The first option has already occurred to the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased working-from-home and virtual learning. However, long-term success for the corridor relies on students returning to classrooms and shoppers returning to businesses. TXDOT is currently studying opportunities to improve traffic flow and entrance and exit movements on IH-69, which could reduce vehicles queuing on surface roads to access the interstate. In the FM624/I-69 Interchange. Source: Google Maps short term, the City can work with TXDOT to redesign and rebuild the Five Points intersection to more efficiently move traffic. Encouraging greater use of recently improved County Road 52 could reduce demand during peak hours, particularly for traffic heading south. Effective diversion of traffic would eventually increase. A Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) received broad support from survey respondents as a potential innovative solution. A SPUI condenses two signalized intersections into a single intersection with one set of traffic signals, improving efficiency and traffic flow. These are called “urban” because they consume much less right-of-way than other interchange types, such as cloverleafs. Multilane Roundabouts – unsignalized, circular intersections, offer a second alternative to the existing intersection design. Traffic travels in the same direction 1 2 3 4  Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 15 February 2021 15 Single-point urban interchange (SPUI), Phoenix, AZ. Source: Google Maps 51st Street Roundabout, Austin. Source: ASCE Texas Roundabout. Source: Mobility CC around a central median in two ore more lanes to accommodate exits from the outer lane. Advantages include the elimination of left-hand turns, which are frequent causes of vehicular crashes ; reduced idling during non-peak hours; and traffic calming. However, the drawbacks make roundabouts less viable than a SPUI – they consume much more right-of-way and can be prohibitive for truck traffic. Numerous public comments also suggested that motorists would not understand how multilane roundabouts work, and that the new design could cause crashes. Regardless of the specific design intervention, the City of Corpus Christi in the short-term should work with TXDOT and the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to study alternatives to the existing intersection design and function, identify a preferred design, and allocate funding for design and construction. 16 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan16 February 2021 T2: Improve intersections for safety and mobility Goals: Problem Between 2018 and 2019, 272 crashes, resulting in 3 deaths, 4 suspected serious injuries, 12 crashes with non- incapacitating injuries, and 60 crashes involving possible injury occurred in the corridor. Three fatal collisions in the corridor between 2018 and 2019 resulted in the death of one cyclist and two pedestrians. Intersections are frequent locations for traffic crashes. Every pedestrian- vehicle collision occurred near an intersection (River Trail Drive, FM 1889, and Interstate 69E). Numerous survey respondents warned of the need to calm high- speed traffic, particularly at intersections where existing shoulders allow motorists to make turns at high speeds. Solution Reducing speed and improving visibility at intersections are proven methods for making roadways safer. Numerous intersection design interventions can effectively calm through-traffic and turning traffic, including high-visibility crosswalks, raised crosswalks, Raised, high-visibility crosswalk. Source: Appleton Department of Public Works curb extensions (also known as “bump-outs”), pedestrian countdown signals, street lighting, and roundabout treatments. The concept map on pages 10-11 shows locations for recommended priority intersections for these types of traffic calming measures: IH-69 Numerous crashes have occured at this major intersection in recent years. The costs are measured not just in human injuries and property damage but also increased traffic congestion and use of emergency response resources. • Recommendation: Pedestrian countdown signals; High-visibility crosswalk markings; Pedestrian refuge island; street lighting. County Road 69 One mile west of IH-69, this signalized intersection is the next north-south road to extend to County Road 52 and points southward, and therefore is an important alternative route for westbound and eastbound traffic. Northward, it serves Hazel Bazemore County Park and the future Calallen Elementary School. • Recommendation: Pedestrian countdown signals; High-visibility crosswalk markings; Raised crosswalks; Curb extensions; Pedestrian refuge island; street lighting. 1 2 3 4  Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 17 February 2021 17 Raised, high-visibility crosswalk in Appleton, WI. Source: Fox11 News/City of Appleton Pedestrian countdown signal. Source: Maricopa Association of Governments Pedestrian refuge island Source: NACTO Farm-to-Market Road 1889 FM1889 is the next road to the west of CR69 to provide a southern connection to CR52. The H-E-B grocery company (landowner) has installed infrastructure at the large, currently undeveloped parcel to the southeast, and neighborhood retail and new housing are also planned for the vicinity. • Recommendation: Pedestrian countdown signals; High-visibility crosswalk markings; Raised crosswalks; Curb extensions; Pedestrian refuge island; street lighting. River Trail Drive, Riverview Drive, and East Riverview Street These three roads serve the low-density residences outside city limits to the north of Northwest Boulevard between FM 1889 and County Road 73. They are each two lane roads and their intersections with Northwest Boulevard are unsignalized. Public feedback indicated unsafe conditions making left turns from the roads onto Northwest Boulevard eastbound. A fatal pedestrian collision also occurred at this part of the corridor in recent years. • Recommendation: Roundabout or signal timed to prioritize east-west traffic. street lighting. Curb bump-out. Source: NACTO 18 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan18 February 2021 T3: Build active infrastructure along roadways Goals: Problem 75% of Visioning Survey respondents “Strongly Agree” (53%) or “Somewhat agree” (22%) that “Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be safer and more accessible and convenient for people to walk or bike along (such as by adding sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian signals).” Recent crashes involving people riding bikes could have possibly been avoided if safer facilities were in place to accommodate them. Solution Wide sidewalks and bikeways separated from vehicular traffic are safer and more comfortable than the existing roadway facilities, which consist of wide shoulders west of Calallen High School, and narrow sidewalks immediately adjacent to traffic lanes east of the high school. The City's adopted Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility (an amendment to MobilityCC) provides guidance for these types of facilities. Sidepaths are essentially wide (at least 10’) sidewalks that permit shared use by people walking or bicycling. These are recommended the entire length of the north side of Northwest Boulevard Sidepath. Source: City's Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility Shared lane markings. Source: Corpus Christi Caller Times Buffered bike lane. Source: League of American Bicyclists 1 2 3 4  within the study area, and on the south side of Northwest Boulevard from FM1889 to IH-69. On-street bike lanes separated by a two-foot pavement marking – known as buffered bike lanes – are recommended for less travelled north-south collector roadways, including County Road 69, Riverview Drive, River Hill Drive, and Wood River Drive. One-way cycle tracks – physically separated travel lanes for people bicycling – on both sides of these streets may also be appropriate if right-of-way constraints prohibit buffered bike lanes. Shared lane markings (“sharrows”) are appropriate on local, low-volume, low-speed streets that are nonetheless important connectors between destinations, sidepaths and buffered bikeways. The City may pair installation of sharrows with wayfinding and regulatory signage reminding motorists that “Bicycles May Use Full Lane” (MUTCD Section 9B.06). The Concept Map on pages 10-11 illustrates recommended locations for installing each of these facilities, , supplementing recommendations made by the Phase I Bicycle Mobility Plan.. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 19 February 2021 19 Figure 4: Summary of Right-of-Way Change Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft ACB 100%80%60%40%20%0%Street Sections% of Right of Way C B A Study area Automobile Median Sidewalk/Shared Use Path Planting Zone Shoulder Buffer Northwest Boulevard at I-69 Northwest Boulevard at Riverside Boulevard Northwest Boulevard at River Hill Drive Existing Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Proposed 20 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan20 February 2021 Walking School Bus. Source: New Dream blog T4: Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand Goals 1 2 3 4  Traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard tends to peak during school opening and dismissal times. Closer coordination between the City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT and Calallen ISD can help manage the flow of this traffic and reduce the number of vehicles travelling to and from campuses. This coordination began during the corridor planning process and resulted in short-term actions: • The City, ISD, and TXDOT will review signal timing at Wildcat Drive and River East Drive for the opportunity to prioritize predominant traffic movements during peak morning and afternoon periods - particularly during the 4pm rush hour. • TXDOT is working with Callen ISD to produce a traffic management plan designed for special events - namely, football games and the exit of hundreds of vehicles from Calallen High School at once. Programs can reduce the number of vehicles needing to access the school site for pick-up and drop-off. For instance, parent volunteers and school officials can organize walking school busses, in which parents and guardians drop elementary school students a short distance from campus, and students walk together to school as a group. This program offers the added benefit of increasing children’s daily physical activity. More information is available at: http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org/ walking_school_bus/ Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 21 February 2021 21 Consider one-way routing of drop-off and pick-up traffic Westbound right-turn-only lane: Change to through lane OR add more signage/warning that lane ends Potential roundabout to calm traffic at Wildcat Drive Wildcat DriveNorthwest Blvd Walking/bicycling paths on both sides of Northwest Boulevard connect to residential neighborhoods Figure 5: Improved Traffic Circulation 22 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan22 February 2021 Land Use, Zoning and Business Strategies Figure 6: Existing Future Land Use Map Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 0 2,000 ft 69 Figure 7: Proposed Future Land Use Map 0 2,000 ft 69 Study area City Boundary High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Water Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRi v e r w o o d D r Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRi v e r w o o d D r Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 23 February 2021 23 L1: Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment Goals Problem While the properties fronting Northwest Boulevard between IH-69 and CR 69 are largely developed, large, undeveloped parcels front the roadway west of CR 69. The PlanCC Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2016 includes a Future Land Use Map for the area, but the Northwest Boulevard Corridor planning process has given the public - and the Planning Division - the opportunity to focus more closely on the Calallen study area. Visioning survey respondents offered broad support for various principles of new development. 59% somewhat or strongly agreed that “the area should provide more compact, mixed-use development,” while 79% somewhat or strongly agreed that “the area should offer more opportunity for jobs and for opening and growing businesses. 91% said restaurants, including fast food, ice cream shops, and sit-down restaurants, are appropriate on Northwest Boulevard, and nearly 70% of respondents said they are appropriate for side streets. Attracting a full-service grocery store and more dining options was the second most popular response to the question “If you could do one thing to improve the Northwest Boulevard area, what would you do?” In response to two alternative future land use map scenarios - in which one offers a uniform land use pattern of residential uses set behind commercial uses facing Northwest Boulevard of consistent intensity, and the other proposes a mix of uses fronting the roadway but varying from higher intensity toward the east to low intensity toward the west - survey respondents frequently cited support for commercial uses fronting Northwest Boulevard, but to limit development intensity westward in the corridor in order to mitigate traffic. Solution The proposed Future Land Use Map to the left responds to each of the concerns and priorities described above to fulfill the project vision and goals. It combines elements of the two alternatives. This recommendation's intent is to provide only for low-to-moderate intensity commercial or residential uses in the corridor west of FM 1889. However, the Future Land Use Map categories adopted in the PlanCC Comprehensive Plan do not distinguish between low- and high-intensity commercial or mixed uses. Therefore, policymakers considering any proposed changes to the zoning of parcels in this corridor should consult beyond FIgure 7 for guidance. The new map proposes the following changes: • Conversion of Commercial land east of CR 69 to Mixed Use, to incentivize and provide flexibility for redevelopment of aging commercial properties. The intent is not to encourage exclusively residential development directly fronting Northwest Boulevard. • Conversion of low-density residential land east of CR 69 and south of Northwest Blvd. to “Medium-density residential,” consistent with surrounding residential land and more intense uses of this segment of the corridor. • Conversion of land south of the 500’ buffer from Northwest Boulevard between CR 69 and FM 1889 designated “Mixed Use” to “Medium-density residential.” This designation is recommended over “Commercial” in order to allow flexibility to proposed, large developments that include residential uses as part of compact, mixed-use development. The intent is not to encourage exclusively residential development directly fronting Northwest Boulevard. • Conversion of land fronting Northwest Boulevard between East Riverview Street and CR 69 currently designated “Commercial,” “High-density residential,” and “Government” and undesignated land to “Mixed Use” These changes result in a land use plan that allows flexibility necessary for the private real estate development to respond to market demand while respecting community priorities for orderly development. In addition to adopting the Future Land Use Map changes described above, the City should phase public investment into new site-serving infrastructure to areas south of the Northwest Boulevard that currently lack them. Property owners cited this absence of infrastructure access as a key impediment to development of this area. This should be done in coordination with planned improvements to the roadway itself to reduce impact on existing businesses and residents. 1 2 3 4  24 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan24 February 2021 L2: Relax zoning restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID Goal Challenge COVID-19 has created unprecedented challenges for small and local business owners who, due to coronavirus restrictions, have temporarily closed or reduced services offered. Businesses may have been able to capitalize on temporary financial assistance programs to address gaps in revenue, but as COVID-19 continue to threaten any return to normal, businesses are finding it difficult to make minor, temporary adjustments to their regular operations due to City regulations, or to reduce expenses, such as rent or utility bills. Meanwhile, the study’s participants hold the Northwest Boulevard businesses in high regard and value their small-town feel, while also enjoying the diversity of restaurants, retails and goods, and services the corridor offers. The area residents support strategies that would bolster existing and future businesses, especially restaurants and retail, likelihood of surviving the pandemic. Opportunity Allow outdoor operations in parking spaces City Unified Development Code 7.2.2 requires a standard ratio for all commercial zoning districts; restaurants have the lowest ratio at 1 off-street parking spot per 150 square feet of gross floor area. If businesses such as restaurants and retail could extend their services to 50% of its off-street parking spaces, restaurants would be able to accommodate more customers while maintaining social distancing. The City of Houston launched their “More Space”1 program in August 2020, where at no cost to the business owner, the owner can simply fill out an on-line form stating its intention and proposal to meet the program’s requirements. • Corpus Christi City Code 38-232 restricts no more than two food trucks on a private property. The City may consider granting permission to increase the number of food trucks in a parking lot as long as it does not conflict with the 50% rule previously mentioned. 1. https://houstontx.gov/mayor/press/2020/more-space-program-restaurants.html#:~:text=The%20new%20program%20allows%20any,strict%20health%20and%20safety%20guidance. 2. https://library.municode.com/tx/corpus_christi/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIIITHCOOR_CH38PEVEMOFOVEITMESO_ARTIINGE_S38-17VEGERE Parking lots provide ample space for restaurant-goers to dine outdoors while socially distancing. Source: Montgomery County Planning Commission 1 2 3 4  Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 25 February 2021 25 Conceptual illustration showing the conversion of a parking lot and adjacent plaza into dining space. Source: Montgomery County Planning Commission Collaborate with business owners to transform vacant properties/storefronts into entrepreneurship incubator spaces Businesses may be faced with vacating their leases due to reduced revenue over time. Temporary permits for pop-ups and incubator spaces can be tedious and cost prohibitive. To help facilitate temporary activations, the City of Austin created a Pop-up retail Ordinance (Section 25-1-364)3 that allows for issuance of temporary Certificates of Occupancy. Permits can be issued for up to 45 days and renewed once for a maximum of 90 days. This opportunity creates the flexibility needed for entrepreneurs while helping bridge the costs of rent and property taxes. 3. https://library.municode.com/TX/Austin/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH25-1GEREPR_ART9CECOOC_S25-1-364TECEOC EXISTING PROGRAM United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce Grant Program: up to $5,000 to businesses with 3-20 employees in economically disadvantaged, vulnerable neighborhoods 26 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan26 February 2021 L3: When funding becomes available, continue to provide small business programs that target the long-term impacts of COVID-19 Goal Challenge Available public aid for small businesses and economic opportunity has nearly all been distributed to Corpus Christi businesses and organizations. Unfortunately, the end of the pandemic is likely going to extend through 2021, which will continue to strain small businesses throughout the city. Opportunity Create new marketing opportunities for area businesses, such as “shop local” discounts, regular small business “festival” events, etc. A group of organized businesses can help create an ideal condition for a successful commercial area, promoting each other and contributing to events and special discounts. Marketing and promotions can be an easy first step with a direct impact of attracting foot traffic. At minimum, the group can create a social media campaign, place similarly branded flyers on doorways, and create a discount program for frequent visitors. EXISTING PROGRAM United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce Small Business of the Day highlights a different business everyday. Loca for Local's outdoor market is a local example of a successful curbside pickup and online ordering system during the pandemic with several small businesses participating Provide grants or low/no-interest loans to physically adapt brick and mortar stores These can help fulfill safety standards to keep employers, employees, and customers safe, including plexiglass barriers, walk-up service windows, outdoor seating and shade structures, and social distancing interior modifications. EXISTING PROGRAM City of Corpus Christi COVID-19 Recovery and Response Fund: PPE funds for nonprofits and the Small Business (>20 employees) Regional Pandemic Grant Program available from the United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce, Port of Corpus Christi, and City of Corpus Christi. 1 2 3 4  Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 27 February 2021 27 EXISTING POLICY City of Corpus Christi Resolution 032077 adopted on March 31, 2020 creates the Public Improvement District Policy. Other purchases may include social distancing signage. Source: Kevin Rivoli, The Citizen Businesses need to purchase PPE, such as plexiglass dividers, to protect their customers and employees during the pandemic.. Source: zoranm/E+/Getty Images Coordinated marketing flyers can create a cohesive business district. Source: Steve Mellon / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Create a Public Improvement District (PID) that raises tax revenue for local improvements After business has returned to normal post-COVID, a PID can help the study area’s businesses upkeep public infrastructure like medians and landscaping. Maintenance was raised as a major concern, but beautification of the corridor was a major priority as well. Costs of improvements are paid entirely by property owners within the PID who elect to be included- which is why the timing of this strategy needs to wait for the economic conditions to rebound after COVID-19. 28 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan28 February 2021 Streetscape Strategies Goals No pedestrian or bicycling infrastructure Hardscaped medians Wide lanes Limited safe crossings Problem Northwest Boulevard’s current design is incomplete. It is characterized by multiple wide lanes in each direction, hardscaped medians that limit left turn access, few sidewalks, and few safe crossing opportunities for pedestrians. The lack of options to walk on the community’s “Main Street” limits opportunities for the types of neighborhood-serving businesses for which project participants voiced support. The lack of ideal walking/biking options also results in residents using a vehicle to get around, further increasing congestion and traffic. Wide lanes in urban areas also encourage higher speeds. 1 2 3 4  FM 624 Eastbound near Riverwood Drive. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 29 February 2021 29 Reduced lane widths Figure 8: Streetscape Elements Diagram Solution Northwest Boulevard enjoys a wide, 150-foot right-of-way, and so building roadway design elements that improve safety and accessibility for all modes of travel does not require sacrificing vehicular mobility by eliminating traffic lanes. The diagram on pages 12-13 illustrates how many such features work together to create a comprehensive, “complete street” that meets the needs of all users. The guidance that follows should be relied upon to inform the design and engineering of future improvements to Northwest Boulevard. S1: Reduce lane widths Reducing lane widths discourages speeding while preserving traffic flow capacity, and creates more room for pedestrians to safely cross the street, such as at a wide median, or a curb extension. 30 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan30 February 2021 Enhance planting areas Figure 9: Streetscape Elements Diagram S2: Enhance planting areas Beyond a comfortable sidewalk, shade is perhaps the next most important street feature to people walking in the Texas sun. Minimum 6’ wide planting areas located between the back-of-curb and the sidewalk or sidepath are recommended to accommodate shade trees approved by the City’s landscape ordinance and TXDOT. Additional trees may be planted on the outside of sidewalks and sidepaths, between them and the property line. Shade trees enhance sidewalk comfort. Source: Duplantis Design Group Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 31 February 2021 31 Figure 10: Northwest Boulevard Native Plant PalletteTREES Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Water Use: Medium Texas Mountain-Laurel Sophora secundiflora Water Use: Low/Medium Bur Oak Mossycup Oak Water Use: Medium Huisache Acacia farnesiana Water Use: Low Anacua Ehretia anacua Water Use: Low Retama Parkinsonia aculeata Water Use: Low/Medium Live Oak Quercus virginiana Water Use: Medium Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Water Use: Medium TREES Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Water Use: Medium Texas Mountain-Laurel Sophora secundiflora Water Use: Low/Medium Bur Oak Mossycup Oak Water Use: Medium Huisache Acacia farnesiana Water Use: Low Anacua Ehretia anacua Water Use: Low Retama Parkinsonia aculeata Water Use: Low/Medium Live Oak Quercus virginiana Water Use: Medium Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Water Use: Medium TREES Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Water Use: Medium Texas Mountain-Laurel Sophora secundiflora Water Use: Low/Medium Bur Oak Mossycup Oak Water Use: Medium Huisache Acacia farnesiana Water Use: Low Anacua Ehretia anacua Water Use: Low Retama Parkinsonia aculeata Water Use: Low/Medium Live Oak Quercus virginiana Water Use: Medium Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Water Use: Medium Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus Water Use: High Silver Beard Grass Bothriochloa laguroides Water Use: Low Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Water Use: Low Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Water Use: Medium White Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris - ‘white cloud’ Water Use: Low Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea Water Use: Low Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Water Use: Low Broomsedge Bluestem Andropogon virginicus Water Use: Medium ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Fire Bush Hamelia patens Water Use: Medium Autumn Sage Salvia greggii Water Use: Low American Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Water Use: Low Mealy Blue Sage Salvia farinacea Water Use: Low Texas Sage Leucophyllum frutescens Water Use: Low Barbados Cherry Malpighia glabra Water Use: Medium Dwarf Palmetto Sabal minor Water Use: Medium SHRUBS/PERENNIALS Dwarf Wax Myrtle Agave americana Water Use: Low Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus Water Use: High Silver Beard Grass Bothriochloa laguroides Water Use: Low Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Water Use: Low Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Water Use: Medium White Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris - ‘white cloud’ Water Use: Low Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea Water Use: Low Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Water Use: Low Broomsedge Bluestem Andropogon virginicus Water Use: Medium ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus Water Use: High Silver Beard Grass Bothriochloa laguroides Water Use: Low Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Water Use: Low Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Water Use: Medium White Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris - ‘white cloud’ Water Use: Low Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea Water Use: Low Gulf Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Water Use: Low Broomsedge Bluestem Andropogon virginicus Water Use: Medium ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Fire Bush Hamelia patens Water Use: Medium Autumn Sage Salvia greggii Water Use: Low American Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Water Use: Low Mealy Blue Sage Salvia farinacea Water Use: Low Texas Sage Leucophyllum frutescens Water Use: Low Barbados Cherry Malpighia glabra Water Use: Medium Dwarf Palmetto Sabal minor Water Use: Medium SHRUBS/PERENNIALS Dwarf Wax Myrtle Agave americana Water Use: Low Fire Bush Hamelia patens Water Use: Medium Autumn Sage Salvia greggii Water Use: Low American Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Water Use: Low Mealy Blue Sage Salvia farinacea Water Use: Low Texas Sage Leucophyllum frutescens Water Use: Low Barbados Cherry Malpighia glabra Water Use: Medium Dwarf Palmetto Sabal minor Water Use: Medium SHRUBS/PERENNIALS Dwarf Wax Myrtle Agave americana Water Use: Low 32 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan32 February 2021 S3: Expand and plant medians Current medians serve access management purposes, but could be reconfigured to provide safer crossings and a more attractive streetscape. The U.S. Access Board’s Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) require a minimum six-foot wide median to accommodate people crossing each direction of roadway travel. Eliminating the existing striped buffers provided for turning lanes, or narrowing lane widths, can provide the space needed to widen existing medians and build new ones that meet this width requirement. Such medians should be designed with a curbed end cap to better protect the pedestrian from head-on and U-turn traffic while in the area of refuge. PROWAG standards require detectable warning surfaces on each side of the pedestrian refuge to assist the visually impaired or those with disabilities.. Expand and plant medians Figure 11: Streetscape Elements Diagram Public attitudes toward medians are mixed. Many participants in the first public meeting and respondents to the Visioning Survey warned against investing in median landscapes that the City and State are unable to maintain. Others expressed desire to beautify the roadway by adding plantings along the roadway sides and medians. In response to review of three different median treatments - “Shade,” “Ornamental,” and “Limited,” - a near majority (70 of 144, 49%) preferred Shade, followed by 44 (31%) who preferred the Limited treatment. Given funding constraints for maintenance, the City should work with TXDOT to at a minimum plant drought-resistant ornamental grasses, perennials, and wildflowers, which absorb stormwater, beautify their environment. and require minimal maintenance. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 33 February 2021 33 Wildflower plantings on medians. Source: Prairie Restorations, Inc. Structured plantings on medians. Source: King of Prussia District BENEFITS • Less conflict with vehicles along roadway and planting • More control over type of planting within median • Prioritize funding for pedestrian realm • Provide shade for pedestrian and cyclists • Low Maintenance by using native species and reduction of tree generated debris on roadway CONS • Limited shade on roadway Ornamental Grasses and perennials 18” Offset for maintenance safety and reduce plant over roadway Ornamental Grasses and perennials 18” Offset for mainteance safety and reduce plant over roadway Structured plantings on medians with trees. Source: Jimbo.info Figure 12: Limited Median Landscaping 34 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan34 February 2021 Custom branded street signs, wayfinding signage and banners help create a sense of place and distinguish a district. Respondents to the Concepts Survey overwhelmingly supported (101 of 144, 70%) conceptual designs for unique street signage that’s consistent with the identity of the Callalen Independent School District. Street banners, which typically adorn individual streetlights or may be hung between separate fixtures, even across a street, can supplement branded signage, and be replaced more frequently to mark or advertise seasonal occasions and events, such as festivals or Street Signs Street Overhead Signage Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Option 2 Option 3 Option 3 Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Figure 13: Street Signage Options football games. 90 of 143 Concept Survey respondents (63%) supported this concept. To support the long-term health and cohesion of the Corridor as a distinct place to live, work and learn, the City should work with the ISD, TXDOT, and community to develop and produce a family of street signage and banner typologies. Initial signage and banner installations should occur toward the eastern side of the Corridor, at intersections with IH-69 southbound, Wildcat Drive, and County Road 69. S4: Design and install signage and banners Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 35 February 2021 35 Monument Signage Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Northwest Boulevard Figure 14: Monument Signage Options 36 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan36 February 2021 Gateway Option 1 Option 2 NORTHWEST NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BOULEVARD Figure 15: Gateway Options Street Banners Option 2 Option 3 Kite Festival Kite Festival JULY 4th Celebration July 4th, 6:30pm - 9pm Calallen Wildcat Stadium JULY 4th Celebration July 4th, 6:30pm - 9pm Calallen Wildcat Stadium 7.25 County Park County Park 7.25 Option 1 Kite Festival 7.25 County Park Kite Festival County Park 7.25 Figure 16: Street Banner Options Gateway Option 1 Option 2 NORTHWEST NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BOULEVARD Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 37 February 2021 37 S5: Install Public Art Public art is a way to bring creativity and interest to the Calallen study area, and solidify its identity as a small, tight-knit and family-friendly community. Public art should be made by local artists that reflects local culture and traditions. Blank walls on commercial structures make excellent opportunities for murals, while prominently located, publicly owned land is appropriate for sculptures. 75 of 142 Concept Survey respondents (53%) supported this idea. Art locations are suggested at a variety of strategic locations in the district in the concept map on pages 10-11. Existing Hobby Lobby Wall, potential site for a mural. Source: Google Maps Historic Walker Lake Mural. Source: Zakcq Lockrem Mural Existing Underpass Conditions, potential site for a gateway art. Source: Google Maps Toronto Underpass Park. Source: Justin + Lauren Underpass Art Crosswalks near Calallen High School, potential site for crosswalk art. Source: Google Maps Crosswalks in Lima. Source: Carlos Cruz-Diez Crosswalk Art Riverwood Drive, potential site for an art attraction. Source: Google Maps Glass totems in Cathedral Square. Source: Danny Mingledorff Flickr Sculpture Installation 38 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 IMPLEMENTATION Overview If implemented successfully, the strategies detailed in this report will contribute significantly to achieving the community's vision for Northwest Boulevard. This responsibility rests not just on the City of Corpus Christi, but also its government, nonprofit and business partners who participated in the planning process. The Implementation Matrix that follows organizes all of the Plan’s recommended strategies in one place. Each strategy includes recommended actions and responsible actors, supportive partners, and phasing. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 39 February 2021 40 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Implementation Matrix Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities Transportation 1. Reduce congestion at I-69 Study alternatives to existing design, identify preferred design 1 year Less than $500,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT Allocate/identify funding for design and construction 2 years None N/A City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT Complete construction 4 years Up to $5 million FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan TXDOT; CCMPO 2. Improve intersections for safety and mobility Incorporate traffic-calming, street lighting, and pedestrian facilities into designs for prominent intersections 5 years Less than $500,000 per intersection FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 41 February 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities 3. Build active infrastructure along roadways Construct sidepaths as recommended along Northwest Boulevard 5 years Up to $5 million FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO, CCRTA Install buffered bike lanes along recommended roadways 3 years Less than $250,000 City Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT Install shared- lane markings and signage along recommended roadways 3 years Less than $100,000 City Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT 4. Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand Review signal timing at Wildcat Drive and River East Drive to prioritize predominant traffic movements during peak morning and afternoon periods - particularly during the 4pm rush hour. 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT, Calallen ISD Produce and execute a traffic management plan designed for special events 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT, Calallen ISD Organize a walking school bus program and other activities to encourage walking and biking to school 2 years None N/A Calallen ISD 42 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities Land Use, Zoning and Business 5. Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment Hold necessary Planning Commission and City Council hearings to approve adoption of updated Future Land Use Map (Figure 7, page 22) 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi Phase investment into new water, wastewater, and drainage planning and infrastructure in areas south of Northwest Boulevard 1-10 years Up to $7 million to be determined through engineering assessment and negotiation of shared costs with developers. City Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi; Nueces County Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 43 February 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities 6. Relax zoning and other city restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID-19 Request City staff to explore a temporary program to expand businesses' outdoor operations into off- street parking. Seek City Council approval. 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi Request City staff to create a temporary Certificate of Occupancy program for entrepreneurs in vacant properties. Seek City Council approval. 1 year None N/A City of Corpus Christi 44 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities 7. Provide small businesses programs that target long-term impacts of COVID-19 Encourage Northwest Boulevard businesses to organize and create marketing opportunities for the area. The City will provide ombudsman services. 1 year None N/A Northwest Boulevard businesses; City of Corpus Christi Continue to provide small and local business resources for low/no-cost loans 1 year None Federal and State grants, Philanthropic grants City of Corpus Christi Small Business Recovery Program Request City staff to determine if the Northwest Boulevard area would benefit from a new Public Improvement District. 2 years None N/A City of Corpus Christi and property owners Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 45 February 2021 Strategy Actions Timeframe Cost Potential Funding Sources Responsible and Partner Entities Landscape/Streetscape 8. Reduce lane widths Design and build enhancements to existing and future conditions of Northwest Boulevard to include narrower lane widths 5 years Less than $100,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 9. Enhance planting areas Design and build enhancements to existing and future conditions of Northwest Boulevard to include street trees 5 years Less than $500,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 10. Expand and plant medians Design and build enhancements to existing and future conditions of Northwest Boulevard to include minimally landscaped, expanded medians 5 years Less than $1 million FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 11. Design and install signage and banners Allocate/identify funding for design and construction 5 years Less than $100,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 12. Install public art Allocate/identify funding for design and construction 5 years Less than $100,000 FHWA funds allocated through the CCMPO; Local match paid by local tax revenue/capital improvement plan City of Corpus Christi, TXDOT; CCMPO 46 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Funding the Plan MPO/TXDOT Funds A combination of local, state, federal and even philanthropic funding sources will be necessary to fully implement the Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan. As of the report's writing, funding has not been allocated to support all of the improvements and programs recommended in the Corridor Plan. TXDOT and the CC Metropolitan Planning Organization have programmed $18 million in the regional Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) to expand Northwest Boulevard from four to six lanes with a median, from CR 69 to FM 73, citing traffic volumes and the roadway's designation as a Hurricane Evacuation Route. The prospective timeframe for this $18 million programming is 2031. This Plan has documented several reasons to prioritize funding for roadway improvements outside of capacity expansion, including public desire to mitigate new traffic to the corridor, and to fix existing safety and accessibility problems. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 47 February 2021 48 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 202148Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 APPENDIX Engagement Summary and Documentation Assessment of Opportunities Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 49 February 2021 50 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Public Meetings https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88697436750 • https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88697436750 • Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 51 February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 2 o • o o o • o o • o • o • o • o 52 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 3 • o • o • o o • o Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 53 February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 4 • o • o • o • o • o o o • o 54 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 5 • o • o • o • Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 55 February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 6 The meeting adjourned before panelists had the opportunity to answer all questions. Unanswered questions are below with responses provided through this document. How far out is the jurisdictional boundary of the zoning area going west on FM 624? The City can only control zoning/land use within its City limits. North of Northwest Boulevard (FM 624), East Riverview Drive is the western boundary. South of Northwest Boulevard, the boundary is parallel to and approximately 1,800 feet west of County Road 73. Have any of the developers personally been to our area? Due to travel restrictions related to COVID-19, the planning consultant team has not yet visited the study area in person but will do so in subsequent project phases when determined safe. The planning consultant team does not include private land developers. What is the total timeline for the construction? TxDOT estimates that construction will begin on Northwest Boulevard from Country Road 73 to Wildcat Drive in five to ten years. However, this estimate is subject to change based on future funding availability and prioritization of regional projects. When will Calallen get an H-E-B grocery store? The City does not know the timing related to the opening of any new H-E-B stores. 56 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 7 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 57 February 2021 Public Meeting #1 Summary Uploaded June 25, 2020 8 58 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Public Meeting #2 Summary (Web) July 30, 2020 | 5:30 PM - 7:00 PM CT Held via Zoom Webinar video conference https://corridorscc.com/6206/widgets/19187/documents/13061 Presenters: Brianna Frey, Asakura Robinson Matt Rufo, Asakura Robinson Zakcq Lockrem, Asakura Robinson Hugo Colon, Asakura Robinson Annika Gunning Yankee, City of Corpus Christi Dan McGinn, City of Corpus Christi Agenda: 1. Welcome & Introductions (5:30-5:40 PM) 4. Project Overview (5:40-5:45 PM) 5. Engagement Findings 1 (5:45-6:00 PM) 6. Draft Vision Statement & Goals (6:00-6:15 PM) 7. Draft Land Use & Transportation Alternatives (6:15-6:55 PM) 5. Review of Next Steps and Adjourn (6:55-7:00 PM) Summary: The purpose of the meeting was to share key proposed elements of the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan with the community for their review and comment. Brianna Frey introduced Dan McGinn, Director of Planning, and Annika Gunning Yankee, Senior City Planner, who welcomed attendees and explained the project purpose and recognized Councilmember Everett Roy in attendanc e. Matt Rufo followed with a presentation of a project overview, findings from the first phase of public engagement, and draft proposed vision statement and supportive goals. Presenters then took a few moments to respond to several questions. Mr. Rufo, Zakcq Lockrem, and Hugo Colon then presented a series of draft transportation, land use, streetscape and landscape concepts, or alternatives. Following this presentation, presenters responded to additional audience questions. Q&A Part 1 • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni had a clarifying question on the goal: “Businesses can receive support to recover from the loss of income” He specifically asked if it was from COVID support funds or in general. o Zakcq responded that that is referring to COVID incentives. He shared the when concept plans are reviewed later in the presentation, it will offer more details on what that means. o Peter followed-up in concern that the language is very general and implies the government is going to have subsidies no matter what or when; there are limited resources. He states that they probably do not have any more funds and that they used about $1-1.5 million already. He’s not sure if the goal is appropriate. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 59 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 2 • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni asked if the trails/vegetation pictures used in the presentation were in Corpus Christi and the project area specifically. o Matt answered that the image was in Corpus Christi but was not in the project area. He said they are examples near the area. o Zanoni responded that he would not depend on pictures provided on the tourism website, and he suggested finding pictures of a particular site in Hazel Bazemore Park. • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni asked for clarification if the goal “Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses” referred to which location specifically. o Zakcq clarified it refers to the entire Northwest Boulevard study area. o Zanoni suggested that the planning team should make sure that the local residents want the area to be anchored by small businesses or would prefer larger businesses anchoring the area. o Matt clarified that residents did say they wanted small businesses as a priority from the community survey. He did mention the desire for an HEB as one large business, but many people shared a desire to preserve small businesses. • Question: City Manager Peter Zanoni asked how many people are on the call. o Matt answered that 25 people were on the call, excluding the panelists. • Question: a chat question asked if the planning team was disappointed that only four percent of respondents were identified as small businesses. o Matt answered yes, that the team would of course want to see more participation from small businesses. He shared, however, that members of the Northwest Business Association have been included in an Advisory Committee for the project and that they’ll continue finding ways how to increase engagement for small businesses in the community when they concepts come up for adoption. • Question: is there additional housing included in the plan? What type of housing? o Matt answered that the city does not plan to create its own housing, but will create conditions for the private market to develop housing since the City’s role is to zone land appropriately to permit housing where needed. He said that later in the presentation they would go over the expected housing demand in the next couple of years from population growth. o Dan acknowledged there are some infrastructure challenges in the area. The city is working with a developer just east of the corridor and just east of the NW Boulevard area in response to the Steel Dynamics project because they know it’s going to have a major impact in Calallen. The city anticipates housing will increase and is doing what they can to help developers for only single-family housing now. Q&A Part 2 • Question: there were questions on eliminating turn lanes and how that applies to customers accessing businesses, including people already expressing concern because customers turning left are already getting backed up turning on the boulevard. o Matt answered the medians now are trying to cover several purposes, such as balance flow through the corridor for thru-traffic access, but medians limit access. A lot can be achieved by working with the interaction to make it easier to turn left or right, make a 60 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 3 U-turn, etc. He suggested roundabouts go a long way in helping with that and that there is potential to reduce the number and length of medians if you’re making intersections easier to navigate. He reminded participants that this is a TxDOT roadway and that the city does not have the authority to do it, but reassured that if the Plan reflects consistent resident support, it can go a long way with making a case for changes. • Question: there were questions about pedestrian crossways, specifically crossing to the Walmart and Hobby Lobby plaza. How do we encourage pedestrians to cross at traffic lights and not jaywalking? o Matt answered that pedestrians are going to follow their most convenient route. He shared that the school inquired about a pedestrian overpass. He said good pedestrian infrastructure is necessary to preserve the safety with their convenience; he emphasized enhancing the signalized interactions, curb extensions, high -profile crosswalks, high visibility crosswalks, pedestrian countdown signals as pieces of infrastructure the team is proposing at the signalized intersections. He said it can be tricky for the long stretches of roadway between signals; there isn’t a commonly approved way to cross six-lane roadways without putting something like a HAWK signal that only turns red when someone needs to cross the street. He said that he wasn’t sure there were many applications for that across a six-lane roadway in an urban area. o Zakcq added that another challenge here is that there many cases of someone trying to cross the street from one destination to another must typically walk another half-mile to get to a signalized crosswalk, so he suggested that by human nature that if someone is just trying to get directly across to reach their destination, they will naturally take that route, even if it’s dangerous. The school and community college were examples of this. Zakcq shared that the school is shuttling people between those two spaces. He said that we need to think of human-understanding solutions for travel from one location to another. • Question: An attendee asked Matt to clarify that there will be turning opportunities in the corridor to turn left. o Matt shared that there will not be extending medians to block left-turn lanes. They haven’t heard public opinion expressing a desire for that, so it is not on the table. There are places where medians exist and they will stay that way. The design concepts showing medians are those cases. o Hugo added that the median will not go along the whole way because left turns are needed for businesses, residential areas, etc. He said another reason why medians are important is that in those areas where there are crossing, it can act as a refuge for those crossing. Given that this is a six-lane road, the refuge is vital, but this needs more study with TxDOT. • Question: Can we add an RTA bus stop next to the Walmart? Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 61 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 4 o Matt answered that whether or not that can be done is something the team can relay to the RTA. RTA is currently considering a change to the routing for the area, so instead of going down Leopard Street, circling Five Points, and heading down Route 77 southward toward Robstown, the route would instead move westward and take a left onto 1889, traveling south in that direction; then the reverse direction back up 1889 to the right to Northwest Boulevard. This case presents the need for new bus stop installations and sidewalk infrastructure to serve them. They are still studying this, but the plan would improve pedestrian facilities, ADA-accessible, and provide safe crossings through the roadway. He wasn’t sure where the suggestion was for the new bus stop or what the challenges were with it, but the comments will be relayed. • Question: if you expand the number of traffic lanes throughout the boulevard, what kind of funnel traffic effect will it create at the current mess we already have at the intersection 69/624? o Matt answered when we talk about the expansion of four lanes to six lanes, it’s going to attract more traffic, which naturally happens when you provide more capacity. It simply attracts more cars. If you’re looking to decrease traffic on 624 or slow the increase, expanding does not help. That is a consideration if you’re weighing in on the land scenarios. The uniform land scenario is one where six lanes make more sense because preserving land uses to be less intense; it goes a long way to prevent six-lane expansion. • Question: What will be done to the intersection that County Road 69 and Northwest Boulevard that is already backed up and will get worse when the new school opens? o Matt answered is that the northern part of 69 will be widened to accommodate that traffic. He brought up roundabouts as potential to support this. The intention would be traffic calming and continuation while providing safety for pedestrians. o Zakcq added that the congestion is happening during pick-up and drop-off. Schools across the country and Texas have created plans to smooth that flow, such as airport cell-phone weighting lots, one-way flows, and more. The team is examining this with the schools. • Question: there are concerns about maintenance for trees and landscaping for medians. o Hugo answered there are ways around this considering planting intensity and strategies for special areas to maintain just those areas. This would need further study. He suggested more intensity can be just for prime locations, such as near schools, so it doesn’t have to be along the whole corridor. In terms of watering, they would focus on low-water, native plants. Some plants may not need irrigation or only at the beginning. o Zakcq added there are nongovernmental ways to adopt a highway or median that can be evaluated. • Question: the panelist said alternate routing was asked about, specifically if the team was considering this or if TxDOT was interested in expanding them or find cross -town routes 62 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Public Meeting #2 Summary DRAFT 8.18.2020 Page 5 (e.g., County Roads 52 or 73). The concerns were rather than expanding the Northwest Boulevard, is TxDOT considering looking at othe r routes? o Matt answered that 52 is a popular route. He asked Dan if there is no plan to extend 52 westwards. Dan said correct, there is no plan for that. The county did expand 69 to 1889 recently to provide relief from the highway; there is no plan to go further west. • Question: since most of the growth is west coming down 624, there is fear that the beautification recommendations will not address growth outside the project boundary. o Matt answered this is true. He said the city cannot control what is outside its jurisdiction but can work with them about ideas they generally support based on changing conditions, such as new industrial plants. The hope is that this is a plan that guides future land use and transportation de cision-making; a tool rather than concrete law. The plan can be amended as conditions evolve. This plan is intending to capture the overall sentiment the team has received. Additional Notes • Matt and Annika invited attendees who did not have a chance to ask or have their questions answered to submit their questions or comments over email. Adjourn Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 63 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee Meeting Summary April 9, 2020 | 1:00 PM Held via GoToMeeting video conference Attendees: Arturo Almendarez Calallen ISD Annika Gunning Yankee City of Corpus Christi, Planning Avery Oltmans City of Corpus Christi, Planning Daniel McGinn City of Corpus Christi, Planning Sarah Munoz City of Corpus Christi, Public Works Yasmene McDaniel Corpus Christi Medical Center- Northwest Angela Rhoden Corpus Christi Medical Center- Northwest Mark Porterfield Grace United Methodist Church Craig Casper MPO Jack Taylor Northwest Business Association Mike Pusley Northwest Business Association Paul Thurman Nueces County Commissioner Office- Precinct 1 Juan Pimentel Nueces County Public Works Gordon Robinson Regional Transportation Authority Judy Telge Transportation Advisory Commission Charles Benavides TxDOT Thomas Tiffin Wood River Community Association Brianna Frey Asakura Robinson (consultant) Matt Rufo Asakura Robinson (consultant) Meghan Skornia Asakura Robinson (consultant) Zakcq Lockrem Asakura Robinson (consultant) Absent: Rose Fernandez Calallen Apartments Everett Roy City of Corpus Christi Councilmember District 1 Carolyn Vaughn Nueces County Commissioner- Precinct 1 Agenda: 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Presentation 3. Group Discussion 4. Next Steps 5. Adjourn Questions for Group Discussion: 1. Does your department/organization have any projects or plans in this study area? Advisory Committee Meetings 64 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 2. What do you and your department/organization see as key issues facing the study area? 3. What are the biggest challenges you see for this project? 4. What opportunities for programming and new uses do you see? What community needs could be met? 5. Who are the key stakeholders that should be engaged? 6. What impediments to implementation might we face? Notes: Welcome and Introductions Presentation ● Discussion and clarification for the engagement timeline during the COVID crisis. ● Discussion and clarification about the plan’s goals, such as the land use component and addressing the existing traffic issues. ● Discussion about upcoming projects along the corridor, including the HEB tract and Country Road 52. Group Discussion ● Discussion of ongoing projects in the area, including from TxDOT, the MPO, and developers. ○ TxDOT is planning flyover enhancements to alleviate vehicle stacking. This project has started and will add additional lanes through new striping. ○ The MPO and TxDOT are funding a separate feasibility study to examine construction along the Northwest Boulevard corridor, but the State will be billions short in tax revenues. Current expected timeline is 24 months ○ HEB owns a large parcel at Northwest Boulevard and FM1889 ○ Calallen Retail Partners also owns adjacent land and plans to build apartments ○ A new elementary school is planned adjacent to the high school. This school will let out at 3pm. 80% to 100% of students will qualify as bus riders. ● Discussion of specific traffic problems, such as certain choke points, peak traffic hours, access management, and dangerous intersections. ○ Attendees expressed concern that any new development will exacerbate existing traffic challenges ○ In general, the Boulevard has high traffic counts - carries about 33,000 vehicles per day, comparable to Staple Street. ○ Country Road 52 was to alleviate traffic counts but has not performed as well as intended ○ Right of way between I-69 and the high school is as wide as possible. ○ Access management ○ I-69 and Northwest Boulevard intersection: ■ Long delays at peak hours, and the problem is worsening. Current delays can be up to 10-15 minutes and worse during school opening and closing times. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 65 February 2021 ■ Stacking regularly occurs at the northbound onramp to I-37 in front of Chilis - TxDOT is examining alternatives to mitigate this traffic. ○ School drop off and pick up impacting traffic patterns - TxDOT works with schools on internal traffic control plans to slow flow onto Northwest Boulevard, such as through metering. ○ A couple hundred of the 1,200 high school students drive their own cars. Eight buses drop off in the morning and pick up in the afternoon. ● Discussion of study area’s challenges, including the lack of available infrastructure for future development, and drainage problems. ○ Continued sprawl of Corpus Christi residents moving outward will continue to increase traffic numbers on Northwest Boulevard ○ Limited utility infrastructure continues to curb potential commercial and residential development in the study area ○ The Boulevard has drainage ditches rather than stormwater drainage system, and stormwater lingers in them for days. ○ The areas south and west of the Boulevard are served by two different water districts. ○ The city’s development regulations require new development sites to have detention ponds to prevent frequent and significant flooding ● Study Area Opportunities: Attendees named several amenities and facilities that could improve quality of life for study area residents, including: ○ Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure that connect homes to schools and open space ○ Increased transit service, particularly for residents of the new Wood River apartments at FM 1889 ○ Practice ballfields (baseball) with lighting ○ Neighborhood bicycle/pedestrian connections to Hazel Bazemore Park ● Discussion of stakeholders that need to be involved in the planning process and how to reach existing residents. ○ Attendees offered support to the project team in identifying study area constituents to engage ○ Existing businesses and the Business Association ○ Neighborhoods and the Neighborhood Associations, including Wood River neighborhood Next Steps ● The project team is conducting a Needs Assessment over the next month and will have a draft for presentation at the next Advisory Committee meeting. ● The project team is also working toward a project public launch and redesigning the engagement plan in light of restrictions against travel and public gathering. Adjourn 66 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee Meeting Summary May 21, 2020 | 10:00 AM CT Held via Zoom video conference Attendees: Annika Yankee, City of Corpus Christi Avery Oltmans, City of Corpus Christi Charles Benavides, Texas Department of Transportation Craig Casper, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Dan McGinn, City of Corpus Christi Gordon Robinson, Regional Transit Authority Jack Taylor, Northwest Business Association Keren Costanzo, City of Corpus Christi Judy Telge, Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living & Transportation Advisory Commission Leane Heldenfels, City of Corpus Christi Mark Porterfield, Grace United Methodist Church Michael Alvarez Mike Pusley, Northwest Business Association Rob MacDonald, Corpus Christi MPO Brianna Frey, Asakura Robinson Meghan Skornia, Asakura Robinson Abygail Mangar, Asakura Robinson Matt Rufo, Asakura Robinson Zakcq Lockrem, Asakura Robinson Agenda: 1. Introductions 4. Project Schedule 5. Phase I: Findings 6. Phase II: Visioning 7. Phase II: Outcomes 5. Adjourn Notes: Introductions Presentation • Discussion on project schedule status • Discussion on latest city goals • Discussion on Phase I findings from the Needs Assessment; Focuses on residents, land use, open space / community assets, congestion and safety. Concluded with discussion on what is missing from Needs Assessment findings. • Discussion on Phase II visioning; focuses on land use changes from 2016 comprehensive plan, recent TxDOT and CC MPO regional Transportation Improvement Plan investment, development opportunities/ideas (e.g., streetscape, public arts/murals, bicycling infrastructure). Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 67 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 2 • Discussion on marketing the upcoming engagement • Summary of Phase II outcomes (i.e., vision statement, supportive goals, development ideas) Project Overview • Discussion on upcoming meeting and goals: o 5/28 is first virtual public meeting. Marketing materials (e.g., flyers) have already been created and will be shared o Draft vision statement and goals will be determined following the meeting; draft deliverables will be submitted to committee in July for public comment o Judy: concern from the wording that there will be an emphasis on accessibility (i.e., not ADA requirement, but feeling the word “accessibility” must explicitly be in the goals). Multimodal and accessibility must vitally be reflected.  Matt shared that there will be engagement questions regarding top 3 words important to project, where such comments as these would be highly relevant o Mike P.: public meeting announcements must go out to NW business association so that they have time to participate if interested. NW Chamber of Commerce is suggested. Phase I: Findings • Discussion on Needs Assessment o Poll on who received the reviewed the Needs Assessment. o Attendees were skeptical of the traffic volume information shared:  Mike P. requested clarification on the lack of change in traffic volumes in the last 20 years. Zakcq: traffic volume decreased significantly during the Great Recession. Explained data from Figure 20 of the Needs Assessment that clarified the different types of traffic changes. o Clarification on zoning map changes:  Commercial #3 rezoned to residential? Site #3 is called Martin Plaza. It is zoned commercial. It was recently subdivided into two commercial lots. The subdivision plat application indicates urgent care is proposed at that location. o Attendees expressed concern on accessibility and public transportation for vulnerable populations:  Judy: Pedestrian access will be needed for any added bus stops to the corridor, especially connections to schools and apartments. 68 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 3  Gordon: Higher priority to increase flex service to grocery stores and other key destinations. Would like to program the capital for ADA compliance because some apartments are not served effectively.  Annika: Laura R. is a nurse, serving residents of low-income. Route 27 public transit would be especially useful for these underserved groups according to Laura.  Mike P.: Impact on county roads have had on current traffic conditions and routes, particularly how it may favorably impact conditions. On the development and right on way maps, County Road 52 goes all the way to FM 1889. Phase II: Visioning • Clarification on existing plans and investments: o Comprehensive plan approved in 2016 provided new land use map o TxDOT and CC MPO already approved $18 million for street infrastructure improvements, but the designs from the proposal not approved yet. o Jack T: Curb cuts as currently configured are essential to his businesses and asked whether those changes would be made by this plan. Matt R. responded that proposed guidelines may suggest improvements to future curb cuts but that existing curb cuts from recently completed development will not be prioritized for changes. • Reviewed examples of streetscape mechanisms (e.g., wayfinding, bike racks, signage, etc.) that could be implemented in the project. Other design enhancements reviewed include public art/murals, pedestrian safety infrastructure, bicycling infrastructure. • Discussion on materials available to advertise upcoming engagement opportunities: o Public meeting will be 5/28 at 6 PM; website, flyer, and city press release/social media are available about the project and meeting o planning@cctexas.com email to respondents on marketing documents. Commission and city council engagement will be in late August / early September. Visioning survey and marketing materials provided in email sent in the past week. o Reviewed sections and capacities of visioning survey Phase II: Outcomes • Summary on phase II outcomes (i.e., vision statement, supportive goals, development ideas) Next Steps • Visioning survey is on the website and looking for as many respondents as possible. Action: Annika send survey • May 28th: public meeting • June: consultant team analysis meeting • July: advisory meeting #3 • Late July: public meeting #2 Adjourn Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 69 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee Meeting Summary May 21, 2020 | 10:00 AM CT Held via Zoom video conference Attendees: Annika Yankee, City of Corpus Christi Avery Oltmans, City of Corpus Christi Carolyn Vaughn, Commissioner Charles Benavides, Texas Department of Transportation Craig Casper, Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Dan McGinn, City of Corpus Christi Dr. Arturo Almendarez, Callalen ISD Gordon Robinson, Regional Transit Authority Jack Taylor, Northwest Business Association Keren Costanzo, City of Corpus Christi Judy Telge, Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living & Transportation Advisory Commission Leane Heldenfels, City of Corpus Christi Michael Alvarez, City of Corpus Christi Public Works Sarah M, City of Corpus Christi Public Works Thomas Tiffin, P.E, Red River Community Association Brianna Frey, Asakura Robinson Hugo Colon, Asakura Robinson Meghan Skornia, Asakura Robinson Matt Rufo, Asakura Robinson Zakcq Lockrem, Asakura Robinson Agenda: 1. Introductions 4. Project Overview 5. Engagement Findings 6. Draft Vision Statement and Goals 7. Draft Land Use and Transportation Alternatives 5. Review of Next Steps and Adjourn Notes: Introductions Presentation • Discussion on project schedule status • Discussion on survey findings • Discussion on Vision Statement and Goals, including reviewing PlanCC, draft Vision Statement and the four goals. Concluded with a discussion of first reactions to drafted goals. • Discussion on the Concept Plan, which encompasses seven categories of transportation, land use, zoning, small business support, streetscape, landscape, and public art/placemaking. Concluded with a discussion of support or concern. 70 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 2 • Discussion on project’s remaining steps through September. Project Overview • Discussion on upcoming meeting and goals: o 7/30 is second virtual public meeting. Marketing materials (e.g., flyers) have already been created and will be shared o Draft vision statement and goals will be refined following this meeting and the public meeting; draft concept plan will be finalized as well to support the final vision statement and goals. Engagement Findings • Discussion on survey findings o Judy was happy to hear safety features are of high importance. She gave an overview on the Transportation Advisory Committee’s efforts and concerns, and confirmed the consultant team was looking at Vision Zero and the Active Mobility Plan. o Attendees supported the summary of survey findings. Draft Vision Statement and Goals • Discussion on Vision Statement and Goals o Attendees expressed concern on the alignment of the goals to any upcoming MPO work, and asked for clarification on funding and timing of MPO work.  Commissioner Vaughn expressed concern that this study’s beautification efforts would not be reflected in future MPO work.  Charles asked for clarification on MPO funding because dollars have not been allocated yet.  Craig clarified that yes, although the Northwest Boulevard/FM 624 has been identified as a priority area, the Harbor bridge has consumed a majority of the MPOs funding. 2025-2028 is a likely timeline for this effort’s implementation. Clarified that federal funding is performance based.  Zakcq highlighted this planning effort will hopefully position the corridor well for federal funding opportunities.  Annika shared a story about a North Carolina community who formed a Corridor Commission 10 years in advance of a highway redevelopment project, to better align their community’s vision with future construction. o Judy asked for clarification on what was highlighted in the survey results about housing and affordable housing.  Matt explained the mixed results from the survey respondents. Most agreed with the statement that anyone who works in the study area should find housing options, but in another question a majority opposed diverse new housing types. Housing is not addressed in the goals, but the consultant team hopes to collect more nuance from the public in the next phase of engagement. • Draft Land Use and Transportation Alternatives o Discussion of the transportation strategies  Attendees were supportive of the school improvement recommendations, but asked for a more detailed recommendation regarding traffic patterns after major school events, like football games. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 71 February 2021 Northwest Boulevard Corridor Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Summary, DRAFT v1 Page 3 • Artie described the illegal U-turns when attendees want to redirect back east towards I-69. • Zakcq suggested a more detailed phone call between the project team, TxDOT, and the Schools. o Discussion of the land use strategies  The group asked for clarification on if the plan shows residential south of Northwest Boulevard, are we proposed the City would develop utilities? • Matt provided explanation that no, the land use and zoning recommendations would set the stage for private development to build where the market is feasible. o Due to time limitations, following discussion of zoning, small business support, streetscape designs and landscape elements, the Advisory Committee was asked to provide comments through email or through the upcoming online survey. Next Steps • Concept plan survey will be posted the website during the public meeting and the team is looking for as many respondents as possible. o Action: Annika will share survey once it’s been presented at the public meeting. • July 30: Public meeting #2 • August: Consultant team will refine preferred concepts into a Corridor Plan with implementation tactics. • September: Presentation of final report at public hearings. Adjourn 72 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Surveys and Results Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 1 Visioning Survey Summary Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan Prepared by Asakura Robinson July 15, 2020 Overview The Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan process has sought public input on priorities for land use, transportation, and streetscape enhancements. To this end, the City of Corpus Christi Planning Division published an online visioning survey on May 20th, 2020 to gather input from area stakeholder. The responses yielded the following top priorities: 1. Reduce traffic congestion on Northwest Boulevard. Approximately 80% of respondents strongly agreed that the roads should be more convenient for drivers, particularly by mitigating traffic congestion and improving roadway safety. 2. Introduce more grocery shopping and dining options. Respondents shared a strong desire for a grocery store and family-friendly dining options. 3. Enhance beauty and landscaping in the area. Respondents desire to improve area aesthetics with proper landscape maintenance. 4. Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety. Over 50% of respondents strongly agreed that the study area’s roads should be safer, more accessible, and convenient for bicyclists and pedestrians. Disparities were shown in the representation of survey respondents, particularly regarding household income. The survey showed a 15-percentage points gap in representation of households with incomes under $50,000 in the study area. Further engagement efforts should therefore attempt to better achieve representation from lower-income households. Methodology The survey encompassed 17 questions regarding respondents’ perspectives on the Northwest Boulevard’s current landscape and desired and safety. It was open from May 20th to June 29th, 2020, accumulating 435 responses in the open period. Surveys were made available online through a website dedicated to the Northwest Boulevard project (https://corridorscc.com/). The survey was also advertised at the first public meeting on May 28th, 2020, as well as on several social media platforms (e.g., Facebook. Twitter, Instagram, etc.). Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 73 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 2 Findings The following sections illustrate the findings of each question from the survey. Question 1: What is your connection to the Northwest Boulevard area? (n=434) The majority of respondents identified as living in the Northwest Boulevard area. The second most comment connection to Northwest Boulevard was visiting the area for retail, shopping, or dining. 15% own property in the area. Approximately 11% of respondents work in the area, and nearly 10% identified as either going to school, owning a business, or having another unidentified connection to the area. 37% 28% 15% 11% 4%4%1%0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% I live in the area I go out to eat, shop or go to events in the area I own property in the area I work in the area I go to school in the area I own a businessin the area Other I have no connection to the area% of RespondentsConnection to Northwest Boulevard 74 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 Question 2: What makes the Northwest Boulevard area a unique and special place today? (n=327) A free response format, this question gave respondents the opportunity to share their thoughts on the study area’s greatest assets. While no specific prompts were given, a handful of consistent themes emerged: 1. The study area enjoys a small-town atmosphere, yet has access to the amenities and services of a big city. o “Small town nested inside a city, with great potential for growth.” o “The small town feel makes it special and the high school being physically central create a focus on youth and young kids.” o “Small town community "feel" and culture, with conveniences of being part of a larger city.” o “It has everything you could need while still maintaining that small town feel” o “Small town” feel, but also has many restaurants, shops, etc. It is convenient for those who live in the area so we don’t have to drive into town for everything.” o “Away from the hustle and bustle that exists in other areas of the city. Like living in the country but being in the city limits.” 2. The study serves achieves many purposes, meeting many needs in one space. o “I use it every single day to go to and from my house and everything we shop is in the same area!! It’s our lifeline.” o “It has everything we need and nothing we dont. It's quiet, away from the city, and has a great school.” o “Various businesses, schools, and parks are all in a central area.” o “The ease of getting to the area along with the surprising variety of places to eat and shops to visit.” 3. The study area represents a small, tight knit community. o “It’s a small community where people take care of one another. Going out you frequently run into friends or family.” o “The small town feeling. Everyone knows everyone. The fact a lot of the stores or shopping is super close.” o “We are a close knit community away from the main part of the city but close enough to have all the benefits of a city.” o “It is a tight-knit community, with almost everything we need within a stone's throw.” 4. The study area offers many businesses and shopping options to residents. o “Business growth and a diverse population that reside there have made the areas around Northwest Blvd a true melting pot with its own unique sense of pride and character.” o “It’s a small town with some big and small businesses to keep me and my family happy.” o “Still has small business, family-owned unique places. Friendly people with good customer service.” o “What makes it special is the amount of people who don’t live in the area that come to visit and enjoy the small businesses.” Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 75 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 4 Question 3: What are three words you would use to describe your vision for the future of the Northwest Boulevard area? (for instance: healthy, prosperous, safe, fun, family-friendly, welcoming, accessible) (n=379) The chosen words for vision regarded topics of safety, accessibility, economic development, transportation, and culture. Over 20% of respondents identified safety as its main vision for Northwest Boulevard. A desire for a family-friendly environment was clear as the second top word for vision. Accessibility was the third most common word for a vision of Northwest Boulevard; based on the feedback given in other questions, accessibility seemed to regard road accessibility in terms of traffic conditions. It should be noted that several of the top words from respondents were given in the question itself as examples, potentially acting as a leading question. 22% 13%11% 7%5%4%3%2%1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Top Words for Vision 76 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 5 Question 4: If you could do one thing to improve the Northwest Boulevard area, what would you do? (n=395) Transportation topics collectively represented nearly 70% of responses as the one improvement desired for Northwest Boulevard. Improving traffic flow and congestion was respondents’ top concern for improvement with 47% of responses. Other transportation concerns discussed included traffic light challenges (i.e., potential light synchronization issues in particular and the desire for more lights) and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Regarding the latter, one respondent wrote, “Find a way to accommodate foot traffic safely. There are too many walkers on the shoulders of the road. There should be sidewalks a safe distance from the road and perhaps barriers to prevent road traffic from impeding sidewalks.” The second top choice for improvement was a need for a grocery store and more restaurants in the study area. Other top desired improvements included a desire for more businesses and improving infrastructure (i.e., in general, or specific mentions to burying power lines); government/city services and healthcare regarded the desire for a larger police presence as well as a desire for a hospital in the study area. 3%3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 12% 47% One Improvement to Northwest Boulevard Better Government/City Services and Healthcare Upgrade Infrastructure Increase the Businesses/Shopping Options Improve Bicycling and Pedestrian Safety Address Traffic Lights Challenges Enhance Beautification and Landscaping Develop a Grocery Store and Restaurants Improve Traffic Flow and Congestion Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 77 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 6 Question 5: Please tell us how much you agree with the following land use priorities. (n=432) The two most supported land use priorities for Northwest Boulevard were: • The area should offer more opportunity for jobs and for opening and growing businesses (79% “Strongly agree” or “Agree”) • Area signage should be regulated to be more attractive (72% “Strongly agree” or “Agree”) The two most opposed land uses for the study area were: • The area should allow light industrial uses, such as warehousing, commercial food production, commercial printing, commercial laundry, etc. (54% “Strongly disagree” or “Disagree”) • The area should provide a wider variety of housing options for different types of households (45% “Strongly disagree” or “Disagree”) Respondents showed more mixed attitudes toward the remaining two land use priorities presented. Approximately 60% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Northwest Boulevard should provide more compact, mixed-use development to promote walkability in the area; nearly 60% of respondents also agreed or strongly agreed that people who work in Northwest Boulevard should be able to find housing in the area. 47%41%32%27% 13%8% 32%31% 27%28% 17%15% 11%20% 22%25% 24% 22% 6%5% 10%12% 19% 22% 4%3% 9%8% 26%32% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% The area should offer more opportunity for jobs and for opening and growing businesses Area signage should be regulated to be more attractive The area should provide more compact, mixed-use development that makes it easier for people to walk to places if they wish or if walking is their only form of transportation People who work in the area should be able to find housing within their means in the area The area should provide a wider variety of housing options for different types of households The area should allow light industrial uses, such as warehousing, commercial food production, commercial printing, commercial laundry, etc.% of RespondentsLand Use Priorities Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 78 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 Question 6: What kind of housing needs are currently not being met in the Northwest Boulevard area? What should be done to address them? (n=278) The most common response was that Northwest Boulevard’s current housing market is sufficient (31%). Respondents’ second most common sentiment regarded an unfavorable viewpoint toward low-income or government housing (11%). Many respondents proposed housing options alternative to low-income or government options: multifamily housing (10%), affordable housing in general (10%), single-family housing (10%), and middle-class housing (8%). One respondent shared, “Affordable apartments or townhomes that aren’t income restricted. Either you make too much or not enough, but rent is still high. Not sure what should be done to address them.” *LIH: low-income housing 1% 1% 2% 3% 7% 8% 8% 10% 10% 10% 11% 31% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Mobile Homes Need More Housing Overall Condos High End Housing Not Sure Other Housing Concerns More Middle Class Housing More Affordable Housing More Single Family More Multifamily Housing Too Much LIH* / No More LIH Current Housing Sufficient % of Responses Unmet Housing Needs in Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 79 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 8 Question 7: Please add any additional thoughts you have about housing in the area. (n=205) This question was a free response format for respondents to share their thoughts on housing in the study area. The following themes emerged: 1. The study area lacks a variety of housing options. o “There’s not much that meets the needs of the average working class or single income families.” o “Townhome options for senior citizens should be encouraged to build.” o “Would be nice to have single living options outside of low income options.” 2. The study area shows challenges in affordable housing for residents. o “Being someone who makes $50k/year, it was hard to find a house in the area I could afford. If I could, it wasn't in the shape or neighborhood I wished to live. Renting an apartment = house payment.” o “Affordable housing options but with property standards to be kept. Nice architectural features with clean and appealing aesthetic and colors.” o “The city needs more affordable housing options and mixed used residential areas.” 3. The study area requires infrastructure upgrades in order to support new development. o “Need to be able to walk on sidewalks from houses to school and businesses.” o “It needs to be developed with sewer lines not septic.” o “People want acreage and utilities.” *LIH: low-income housing 80 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 9 Question 8: Please tell us how much you agree with the following roadway and transportation priorities. (n=427) The most supported roadway and transportation priority for Northwest Boulevard was “Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be more convenient for auto traffic, with less congestion,” with 94% agreement, 80% of which was strong agreement. Safety for bicyclists and pedestrians was the second- highest transportation priority, with one in three respondents agreeing that roads must be safe, accessible, and convenient for bicyclists and pedestrians. Addressing landscaping and beautification also showed a considerable agreement, with 69% identifying it as a priority. Improvement of public transportation (i.e., buses) to connect people in the Northwest Boulevard area to other parts of the region was slightly unfavorable (17%) but overall, 48% agreed or strongly agreed that this is a priority. Public transportation connections into the Northwest area similarly showed slight opposition (16%) but general agreement, with 49% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing it is a priority. One in three respondents, expressed neutral perspectives on these statements (i.e., 36% and 34%, respectively). 80% 53%43% 26%24% 14% 22% 26% 22%25% 4% 12%18% 36%34% 1% 5%5%8%7% 1% 8%7%9%9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be more convenient for auto traffic, with less congestion Northwest Boulevard and area roads should be safer and more accessible and convenient for people to walk or bike along (such as by adding sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian signals) Northwest Boulevard and area roads should have more trees and landscaping for beautification and shading Northwest Boulevard should have better transit/bus options that connect the area to other parts of the region. Northwest Boulevard should have better transit/bus options to help people get to places along Northwest Boulevard.% of RespondentsRoadway and Transportation Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 81 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 10 Question 9: What types of new public and commercial uses are appropriate in the Northwest Boulevard area? (n=426) The survey asked respondents to indicate whether various types of public and commercial land uses were appropriate on Northwest Boulevard or on side streets. • Restaurants were the most supported land use for the overall study area. 91% said that this category, including fast food, ice cream shops, and sit-down restaurants, is appropriate on Northwest Boulevard, and nearly 70% of respondents said they’re appropriate for side streets. • 84% of respondents said retail goods are appropriate on Northwest Boulevard, and 70% said they’re appropriate on side streets. • 76% of respondents said outdoor commercial recreation is appropriate on side streets, while 60% said they’re appropriate for Northwest Boulevard. • The most opposed use in the study area was vehicle sales and services (e.g., car rentals, repair shops, tire sales, etc.). 24% of respondents said they’re not appropriate anywhere in the study area, while 20% said they’re only appropriate on Northwest Boulevard. Nevertheless, a plurality – 28% - said they’re appropriate everywhere in the study area. • 23% of respondents opposed overnight accommodations (hotels, bed and breakfasts, inns, motels) anywhere in the study area, though 52% said they’re appropriate on Northwest Boulevard. 82 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 11 Question 10: Please add any additional thoughts you have about public and commercial development in the area. (n=159) 1. Address traffic congestion and roadway challenges in the study area. o “Need better roads to and from the area. Easy access to make it safer.” o “Safer use for pedestrians and cyclists.” o “The commute from FM 666 to IH 37 has become significantly more dangerous & time consuming within the last 5 years. Adding more commercial businesses and neighborhoods will only increase the problem. Please concentrate on alternate routes.” o “This area has been neglected for too long and because of that there is an increase in traffic accidents, traffic congestion, risky driving related to frustration and others driving under the posted speed limit, which further causes congestion.” o “Yes, there are several areas of concern with NW BLVD. The majority of the issues are during commuting times and when Calallen ISD is in session. Again, my suggestion is to expand FM 52 to a four lane with biking and sidewalks, not NW BLVD.” 2. Respondents want additional shopping, restaurants, and businesses in the study area. o “More fun type restaurants for gathering with friends.” o “Mom and Pop Main street type of business/local owners.” o “We are a residential community and wish to remain so. Shopping and recreational activities are welcome. Minimize industrial activities and high-density housing.” o “We need more restaurants in the area that are more diverse.” 3. Respondents want a grocery store in the study area. o “We need an HEB.” o “Just hoping for more variety of food options or grocery options like for instance a meat market.” o “We need a large Grocery store.” 4. Respondents want development in the study area to be based on strategic decisions, such as master planning. o “There needs to be a plan. The plan needs to be enforced. Currently there is too much mixed business/housing/office in the area that makes it less approachable for shopping/eating than other parts of Corpus Christi.” o “Commercial development needs to be spread out all the way down NW boulevard and not just compacted at 5 points.” o “Love the idea of development as long as it looks uniform to the are and traffic flows well.” Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 83 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 12 Question 11: In which ZIP code do you live? (n=356) Respondents covered 22 ZIP codes areas and 12 cities/towns. Representation was highest from ZIP code 78410 (238 responses, 67%) and 78380 (77 responses, 22%). 84 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 13 Question 12: What is your age? (n=427) Question 13: How would you describe yourself? Select all that apply. (n=367) Approximately 88% of respondents identified as White. This roughly matched the Assessment of Opportunities report’s findings of the White population accounting for 90% of the study area’s total resident population. One-percent of study area residents is Black, but the survey only received one respondent that identified as Black; Asian respondents similarly were lacking representation in the survey with only one respondent identifying as so while the study area shows one% of Asian-identifying residents. The survey nevertheless seemed to closely resemble the racial breakdown of the study area. 0% 14% 41% 32% 13% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Under 18 18-34 35-49 50-64 Over 64% of RespondentsAge of Respondents 5%5%0% 0% 2% 0% 88% Race of Respondents Prefer to self describe More than once race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderAsian Native American or Alaska Native Black or African American White Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 85 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 14 Question 14: Are you of Hispanic or Latinx origin? (n=350) Approximately 29% of respondents identified as having a Hispanic or Latinx origin. The Assessment of Opportunities report found that approximately 47% of the study area’s residents identified as Hispanic, demonstrating a 18 percentage point discrepancy between residents and survey respondents. Question 15: What is your annual household income (before taxes)? (n=349) The Needs Assessment found that 22% of the study area’s residents have household incomes below $50,000, but the survey represented only 10% of individuals under this threshold. This marked a socioeconomic disparity in survey respondents, most notably seen in the representation of households with income under $15,000. Another socioeconomic disparity was seen with overrepresentation of households with incomes over $75,000. 71% 29% Hispanic/Latinx Origin of Respondents No Yes 1%2% 7% 16%18% 27% 30% 7% 4% 11% 16% 13% 20% 28% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Less than $15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 More than $150,000 Household Income of Residents with Comparison to the Study Area Survey Northwest Boulevard 86 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 15 Question 16: Please add any other thoughts or ideas you have for improving the Northwest Boulevard area. (n=186) 1. Respondents want the study area to show beautification, landscaping, and improved signage in the study area. o “Beautification!! Goes a long way.” o “This area is the future of Corpus Christi and is the first impression for tourists and visitors coming here. Make it more attractive and accessible so they want to return.” 2. Respondents want improvement in public services and safety in the study area. o “Make it safe.” o “Keep it clean and community friendly. Keep the community involved!” o “Keeping it safe and clean in all ways including types of businesses.” 3. Respondents want the traffic congestion addressed in the study area. o “Better traffic flow. Too much congestion around schools, shopping centers, and entrance and exit off main highway.” o “Traffic congestion needs to be addressed, especially around Calallen High School. It feels like there is no plan for the area so whatever goes.” o “Traffic flow and congestion needs to be addressed.” 4. Respondents want to grocery store in the study area. o “We need an HEB.” Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 87 February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 16 Other Non-Survey Comments Participants in public meetings and other engagement events were given the project managers’ contact information to share additional comments through email. The following were highlighted quotes from email feedback. “I know we are very interested in seeing the bus stops extended into our area since the route seems to stop near the high school presently. It would be nice to see it continue out to the Wood River area which would give access to our church location and some of the services we offer.” – Grace United Methodist Church Food Distribution (Emailed on 7/3/2020) “While driving down the current road trying to envision the project. We do not want three more miles of unkept medians and overgrown right of ways that the state of Texas only maintains on a semiannual or quarterly basis. Nor do we want the overgrown median on Leopard St near Violet Rd or Callicoatte. Which the City of Corpus Christi neglects. We’ve been forgotten for years don’t start something you don’t intend to maintain.” (Emailed on 6/9/2020) List of Traffic and Land Use Priorities (Emailed on 4/24/2020): • What are the key issues facing the study area? o Lack of east and west traffic carrying corridors. o Please notice that Hwy 77 or I-69 has limited east/west penetrations at Northwest Blvd., County Rd. 52 and County Rd. 48. With minimal right-of-way extensions east of said highway. o Several large areas of residential infill needed to complete traffic circulation particularly in the Annaville area. o Limited land use growth opportunities to the north and south of the following major corridors Leopard, Northwest Boulevard and IH-37. Limitations are due to several factors: 1) Nueces River (Annaville & Calallen areas) 2) and more concerning the encroachment and expansion of the Industrial districts in the Annaville & Tuloso Midway areas. o Air quality or lack there of in and around the Kane meat processing facility and industrial plants. Solar Estates and Arlington Heights neighborhoods adversely impacted with very poor air quality on most days. • Assets and opportunities: What is important to preserve, protect, and enhance? o Several large undisturbed natural areas in and around the Nueces River. o City to continue making enhancements to West Guth Park (large regional park) More tree plantings, water feature improvements, etc. o Encourage Nueces County to make enhancements to Hazel Bazemore Park. o More tree plantings, upgrade to facilities and park features. • Challenges and threats: What problems need to be solved? o Improve the traffic grid. Extremely limited east and west traffic corridors funnel traffic loads onto Northwest Boulevard and Leopard creating a real traffic snarl at five points and other intersections along said corridor and Leopard. o City Engineering needs to improve many rural residential rights-of-way by building proper curb and cutter and ADA compliant sidewalks. Many older residential neighborhoods do not have sidewalks so there is no walkable connectivity. • What changes are planned for the study area? 88 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Visioning Survey Summary | Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 17 o A new H.E.B. was forecast to be constructed but has yet to be built. This would seriously relieve the over grounding at the both Walmart and current H.E.B. at Violet and Leopard. o County Road 52 or Cooperative Avenue improvements must continue to relieve traffic pressures on Northwest Boulevard. o Development of and east and west corridor in the Annaville area south of Leopard between I-69 Corridor and Callicoatte Road, Violet Road, McKinzie Road and Rand Morgan Road. o Improvements to HWY 44 with new and under construction overpasses between Corpus Christi and Robstown. • What uses would you propose for new private development? o City sale a portion or all of Labonte Park to private water park developeramusement park. o Development of additional grocery store opportunities. Both H.E.B. and Walmart function as regional stores in an expanding food desert in this area of Nueces county and Corpus Christi. • What kind of public amenities and services are desired? Answered above. • Who are the key stakeholders? o Multiple Refinery Companies with terminals and facilities abutting and o encroaching into planned residential areas. o Nueces County o City of Corpus Christi o Engineering Department (traffic engineering) o Parks and Recreation o Code Enforcement Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 89 February 2021 Transportation and Land Use Strategies Survey Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan Prepared by Asakura Robinson July 29 – August 23rd, 2020 The Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan process has sought the public’s feedback on support, opposition, or other thoughts on 20 transportation and land use strategies proposed for the Northwest Boulevard study area. The City of Corpus Christi Planning Division published an online transportation and land use concepts survey on July 23rd, 2020 to gather input from area stakeholders. The survey closed on August 23rd. The responses yielded the following key takeaways: 1. Strong support for the Vision Statement. Approximately 78 percent of respondents supported the Vision Statement for this project. 2. Coordinating with Calallen ISD to mitigate school traffic (i.e., including one-way drop-off and pickups, closing U-turns during special events, and organizing walking school buses) is the most supported strategy out of the 20 given. Approximately 82 percent of respondents supported this strategy. 3. Agreement with Goal #2: “Northwest Boulevard is prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses.” This goal received 76-percent of respondents support, showing the most supported out of the four proposed Goals for the Northwest Boulevard study area. Some respondents left additional comments expressing a desire for more information on the business incentives to allow for this goal. 4. Mixed feelings on the small business support strategies. The six small business support strategies received a range of 25-64 percent strong agreement. “Create a Public Improvement District that raises tax revenue for local improvements,” received the strongly opposition (i.e., 28 percent collectively somewhat and strongly opposing). “Create new marketing opportunities for area businesses” received the strongest support (i.e., 87 percent collectively somewhat and strongly supporting). 5. Mixed feelings on currently adopted Future Land Use Map. Many respondents express support for the future land use map, particularly for its flexibility on what could be developed and the mixed-use (i.e., commercial, low and high residential). The “Uniform” future land use scenario overall seemed to show more support, however, compared to the “Transitional” future land use scenario. 6. Concern for roundabouts safety. Several respondents expressed concern that the study area’s visitors are not educated on roundabout usage (i.e., causing more accidents). The opposition was from this concern, but roundabout education was recommended by some. 7. Mixed feelings on public art and other aesthetics. About half of respondents supported public art ideas. Opposing respondents expressed that public art funds be instead used to address critical infrastructure needs before such aesthetics. Respondents shared similar opposing sentiments regarding a gateway entrance and signage. Summary of Question Responses Q1 Do you support the following Vision Statement? "Northwest Boulevard is Calallen’s “Main Street,” providing the amenities of a prosperous neighborhood center in a small, tight- knit community. The Boulevard is a welcoming, diverse, and family-friendly place where people go to shop, gather, invest in businesses, play and raise a family." 90 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 • I support this goal (78%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (12%) • I have no opinion (3%) • I have more thoughts to share (7%) Q2 Do you support Goal #1? Northwest Boulevard is safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. » Congestion is less frequent, making it easier for people to get around and navigate the neighborhood. » Traffic is calmed, making it safer for people to drive, walk across, and bike along the boulevard. » Streets and sidewalks are accessible, built to ADA standards. • I support this goal (65%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (28%) • I have no opinion (2%) • I have more thoughts to share (6%) Q3 Do you support Goal #2? Northwest Boulevard is prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses. » A variety of neighborhood restaurants and retail outlets offer a diverse array of goods, services, and family-friendly experiences » Businesses can receive support and incentives from public entities to recover from loss of income • I support this goal (76%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (14%) • I have no opinion (7%) • I have more thoughts to share (4%) Q4 Do you support Goal #3? Northwest Boulevard is healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. » Trees and vegetation provide shade and help drain stormwater » Trails are easily accessible for walking, hiking and biking • I support this goal (68%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (19%) • I have no opinion (9%) • I have more thoughts to share (5%) Q5 Do you support Goal #4? Northwest Boulevard is attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole. » Public infrastructure is expanded to areas planned for development » Public art and neighborhood branding convey a sense of place and beautify the public realm. » Wayfinding signage draws attention to neighborhood attractions and guides visitors » Regulation of commercial signage ensures a consistent, physical appearance along the Boulevard • I support this goal (69%) • This goal needs improvement (specify below) (19%) • I have no opinion (10%) • I have more thoughts to share (1%) Q6 Do you support the following idea? Improve Vehicular Flow at I-69/US-77 by replacing the intersections with innovative solutions, such as a single point urban interchange or roundabouts Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 91 February 2021 • Support (60%) • Oppose (please explain below) (21%) • No opinion (6%) • I have more thoughts to share (13%) Q7 Do you support the following idea? Address safety hazards by investing in traffic calming infrastructure, like raised crosswalks, curb extensions ("bump-outs"), and roundabouts. • Support (67%) • Oppose (please explain below) (17%) • No opinion (7%) • I have more thoughts to share (8%) Q8 Do you support the following idea? Build active infrastructure, including sidewalks, safe crossings, and walking and biking trails. • Support (78%) • Oppose (please explain below) (10%) • No opinion (5%) • I have more thoughts to share (8%) Q9 Do you support the following idea? Coordinate with Calallen ISD to mitigate school traffic, including one-way drop-off and pickups, closing u-turns during special events, and organizing walking school buses. • Support (82%) • Oppose (please explain below) (5%) • No opinion (9%) • I have more thoughts to share (4%) Q13 Please tell us how much you support or oppose the following small business support strategies Provide grants or low/no-interest loans to physically adapt brick and mortar stores • Strongly oppose (7%) • Somewhat oppose (5%) • Neither support nor oppose (15%) • Somewhat support (27%) • Strongly support (46%) Allow outdoor operations in parking spaces • Strongly oppose (10%) • Somewhat oppose (13%) • Neither support nor oppose (17%) • Somewhat support (31%) • Strongly support (30%) Collaborate with business owners to transform vacant properties/storefronts into entrepreneurship incubators spaces 92 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 • Strongly oppose (3%) • Somewhat oppose (2%) • Neither support nor oppose (10%) • Somewhat support (33%) • Strongly support (52%) Create new marketing opportunities for area businesses ("shop local" discounts, regular small business "festival" events, etc.) • Strongly oppose (2%) • Somewhat oppose (3%) • Neither support nor oppose (8%) • Somewhat support (23%) • Strongly support (64%) Create a Public Improvement District that raises tax revenue for local improvements • Strongly oppose (14%) • Somewhat oppose (14%) • Neither support nor oppose (19%) • Somewhat support (26%) • Strongly support (27%) Consider project-based Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for commercial affordability and infrastructure • Strongly oppose (8%) • Somewhat oppose (15%) • Neither support nor oppose (24%) • Somewhat support (28%) • Strongly support (25%) Q14 Do you support the street redesign option for Northwest Boulevard at I-69? • Support (76%) • Oppose (please specify below) (8%) • No opinion (5%) • I have more thoughts to share (10%) Q15 Do you support the street redesign options for Northwest Boulevard at River Hill Drive? • Support (73%) • Oppose (please specify below) (9%) • No opinion (10%) • I have more thoughts to share (8%) Q16 Which proposed street redesign option for Northwest Boulevard at Riverside Boulevard do you support? • Option 1 - Expand to six lanes and add sidewalk/sidepath (15%) • Option 1B - Expand to six lanes with shoulders, and add sidewalk/sidepath (36%) Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 93 February 2021 • Option 1C - Expand to six lanes with shoulders, but reduce lane widths, and add sidewalk/sidepath (16%) • Option 2 - Improve with sidewalks/paths, but keep to four lanes (22%) • Keep as is (3%) • No opinion (6%) • Other (please specify) (1%) Q17 Which roadway median treatments do you support? • I support the Ornamental median treatment to beautify the street (18%) • I support the Shade median treatment to beautify and cool the street (44%) • I support the Limited median treatment to preserve any landscaping budget for trees along the sidewalk/sidepath (28%) • I do not support any median treatments (5%) • I have other ideas (5%) Q18 Do you support the ideas for Public Art? • I support the proposed public art ideas (51%) • The public art ideas need improvement (specify below) (16%) • I have no opinion (22%) • I have other ideas (12%) Q19 Do you support the idea of building gateway entrances to the study area? • I support community gateway entrances (40%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (12%) • I have no opinion (35%) • I have other ideas (14%) Q20 Do you support the ideas for unique street signage? • I support the proposed street signs (67%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (9%) • I have no opinion (17%) • I have other ideas (7%) Q21 Do you support the ideas for Monument Signage? • I support these monument signage ideas (48%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (15%) • I have no opinion (26%) • I have other ideas (11%) Q22 Do you support the ideas for Street Banners? • I support these street banner ideas (63%) • This idea needs improvement (please specify below) (10%) • I have no opinion (22%) • I have other ideas (6%) Calallen High School Contents Introduction .....................................................2 Development History .....................................................................4 Previous Planning ...........................................................................6 Resident Demographics .............................................................10 Land Use and Market Analysis .......................14 Current Zoning ..............................................................................16 Future Land Use Designations ..................................................17 Housing Stock ...............................................................................18 Businesses.....................................................................................18 Retail Market Analysis .................................................................20 Commercial Characteristics ......................................................22 Land Ownership ............................................................................22 Catalytic Development Sites ......................................................23 Transportation Analysis .................................26 Traffic Volumes .............................................................................26 Transit .............................................................................................28 Traffic Safety .................................................................................30 Roadway Geometry .....................................................................33 Pedestrian and Bicycling Infrastructure ..................................35 Assessment of Opportunities June 2020 96 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 This Assessment of Opportunities report summarizes key findings from a review of existing demographic, land use, and economic conditions and recent trends. Among the noteworthy takeaways are: 1. Study area residents enjoy higher incomes and longevity than the average Corpus Christi resident.....................................................................................................................12 The median household income for the study area is between $75,000 to $99,999, much higher than the median household income for Corpus Christi, which is $55,709. The average life expectancy for the census tracts in the study area is 80.5 years, 2.5 years higher than that of Nueces county and 1.7 years higher than that of Texas. 2. The study area is home to approximately 140 businesses and 1,450 employees....18 Businesses serving regional demand include banks, big box retail like Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center, fast food restaurants, restaurant chains, and medical facilities. Restaurants and schools employ the most workers: 2005 and 200, respectively. 3. Residents spend over $120 million annually on groceries, general merchandise, clothing, and health and personal care outside the primary trade area...................20 The current supply of grocery stores could double in number or size to meet just resident demand within the trade area. Residents currently spend over $50 million on groceries outside the trade area. 4. The study area contains 1.5 million square feet of vacant land zoned for commercial uses .................................................................................................................22 Commercial parcels vary largely in size. The majority of commercial properties range between 20,000 and 60,000 square feet.A handful of landowners in the area own 56% of the available vacant land ripe for development, or 29% of the entire study area. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 1 February 2021 KEY TAKEWAYS 5. Traffic volumes along Northwest Boulevard are similar in 2018 to those traffic volumes collected in 1999..................................................................................................24 A steady, incremental increase of traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard is expected based on the 20 year Average Annual Daily Trip (AADT) trends. 6. Three fatal collisions in the corridor between 2018 and 2019 resulted in the death of one cyclist and two pedestrians...................................................................................28 Every pedestrian-vehicle collision occurred near an intersection (River Trail Drive, FM 1889, and Interstate 69E). 7. No sidewalks are present for most of the length of Northwest Boulevard........................35 Sidewalks are present directly along Northwest Boulevard on the northside between Calallen High School campus and Interstate 69E and on the southside between Wildcat Drive and Interstate 69E 8. The 2018 Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility recommends a cycletrack on either side of Northwest Boulevard...................................................................38 Located between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive, this facility would connect the Wood River neighborhood to the intersection with Highway 77. 2 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 7337 69 358 181 Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrStudy area Parks and open space Schools Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 1: Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor 0 1 2 4 mi Buildings Parcels Introduction Thanks in part to a surge of industrial development in the Corpus Christi metropolitan area in recent years, the Calallen area of far-northwest Corpus Christi has experienced new development. From oil refining and transportation to steel production, the expansion in these export industries is bringing wealth and job opportunities to the region. With this investment comes development pressure and demand grows for new homes, retailers and services. The City of Corpus Christi anticipates additional residential and commercial development, as well as a new elementary school, in the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor, shown below. Plans to build a new steel factory in Sinton, if realized, could drive additional demand for new housing and commerce in Calallen. While new Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 3 February 2021 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park development creates new opportunities for people to live, work and do business in Calallen, it also brings new challenges, such as more auto traffic, and more demands on critical infrastructure. This planning study represents the City of Corpus Christi’s effort to proactively plan for orderly, attractive and sustainable growth and development consistent with the community’s vision. The Northwest Boulevard Corridor lies 20 miles upriver from downtown Corpus Christi. The study area comprises a 500-foot buffer to the north and to the south from Interstate 69 to Wright Moravek Road (County Road 73) - nearly three miles. The Nueces River bounds adjacent neighborhoods to the north, while Interstate 69 presents a physical barrier to the east. To the west and south, development quickly transitions from suburban to rural conditions. The Wood River neighborhood is north of the corridor, and major anchors include one preschool, two elementary schools, one high school, River Hills Country Club, Hazel Bazemore Park, Corpus Christi Medical Center, and retail destinations including Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center. 4 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Development History The Town of Calallen was established in 1910 where the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico railroad crossed the Nueces River, and grew into a center for agricultural trade.1 The initial settlement was located to the northeast of the Northwest Boulevard study area, between what is today Interstate 37 and the Nueces River. 1 Calallen Independent School District, History of Calallen, Accessed 20 April 2020, Available at: https://www. calallen.org/domain/88. 1950 1979 1985 The City of Corpus Christi annexed this area in the 1960s, and annexed the majority of the Northwest Boulevard study area in the 1980s and 1990s. Urban development coincided with annexation; its peak development was in the 1980s and 1990s, though many current structures were built prior to annexation. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 5 February 2021 Study area Annexation Periods 1960s 1970s Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 2: Annexation and Development History 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft 1995 2017 1980s 1990s 2000s Satellite image source: Google Earth 6 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Previous Planning As a primary artery serving mutliple institutional uses in Corpus Christi's northwest, Northwest Blvd. has been subject to numerous citywide, comprehensive, and long- range planning efforts. They focus on the function of the roadway, and emphasize the safe balance of user modes, particularly east of FM 1889. Plan Major Goals Relation to this effort Implementation Details Bicycle Mobility Plan, CCMPO, 2018 This plan is Phase I of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility under the CCMPO. The major vision goals are 1) develop a cohesive, strategic network of bicycle facilies that accommodates a diversity of riders 2) Increase the percentage of trips of all types that are made by bicycle 3) Promote health and wellness through bicycling and 4) Enhance safety for bicyclists. The plan methods included developing a community hotspot analysis to determine demand that was then used for bicycle route selection via network analyst reflecting community preferences: 1) Off-road trail connections were prioritized over routes that followed the street network 2) neighborhood streets and minor collectors were prioritized over busier roadways and 3) streets that pass through areas adjacent to activity centers were prioritized over streets that run right through the heart of an activity center or through areas with a very low concentration of destinations. Once presented and “tested” with the community for feedback, specific bicycle infrastructure treatments and facilities were then identified. As Phase 1 of the Mobility Plan, the Bicycle Mobility identifies street segments for bikeway infrastructure and details what types of bicycle facilities are recommended for each street segment. Community engagement informed detailed mapping analyses to select routes and suggest corresponding facility recommendations matching stakeholder preferences. This plan recommendations bicycle infrastructure along Northwest Boulevard between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive in the form of protected cycletracks on either side of the boulevard located outside of the vehicular traffic lanes. Transit Plan 20/20, Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, 2016 A Five-Year Service Plan was developed based on the existing conditions report findings and community engagement activities, including surveys, according to the following themes: upgrades to southside services, more frequent service on Leopard and Port, expanded Sunday service, more direct westside service, Downtown/North Beach route improvements, increased direct routing and frequency in Robstown, consolidated Port Aransas service, expanded Express service, and improved speed and reliability, which are organized within the report according to service types and are divided into two implementation phases. Recommended improvements address service design (i.e. direct routing, route alignment, route deviations, schedule simplicity), established performance metrics (i.e. ridership productivity, passenger loads, schedule reliability, schedule efficiency), and bus stops (i.e. accessibility, amenities, real time arrival information, etc). Transit Plan 20/20 includes recommendations to improve current service after comprehensively analyzing the strengths of the system and identifying gaps in service. The plan includes recommendations that directly impact Northwest Boulevard. Transit Plan 20/20 includes recommended improvements to Route 27, a portion of which operates along Northwest Boulevard within the study area corridor. The plan recommends rerouting Route 27 from the I-69 Access Road after looping around the Five Points Shopping Center to Northwest Boulevard before turning south onto FM 1889. The reroute will likely create additional bus stops along Northwest Boulevard and FM 1889, requiring pedestrian infrastructure to connect these potential bus stops to the existing sidewalk network. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 7 February 2021 PlanMajor Goals Relation to this effort Implementation Details Bicycle Mobility Plan, CCMPO, 2018 This plan is Phase I of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility under the CCMPO. The major vision goals are 1) develop a cohesive, strategic network of bicycle facilies that accommodates a diversity of riders 2) Increase the percentage of trips of all types that are made by bicycle 3) Promote health and wellness through bicycling and 4) Enhance safety for bicyclists. The plan methods included developing a community hotspot analysis to determine demand that was then used for bicycle route selection via network analyst reflecting community preferences: 1) Off-road trail connections were prioritized over routes that followed the street network 2) neighborhood streets and minor collectors were prioritized over busier roadways and 3) streets that pass through areas adjacent to activity centers were prioritized over streets that run right through the heart of an activity center or through areas with a very low concentration of destinations. Once presented and “tested” with the community for feedback, specific bicycle infrastructure treatments and facilities were then identified. As Phase 1 of the Mobility Plan, the Bicycle Mobility identifies street segments for bikeway infrastructure and details what types of bicycle facilities are recommended for each street segment. Community engagement informed detailed mapping analyses to select routes and suggest corresponding facility recommendations matching stakeholder preferences. This plan recommendations bicycle infrastructure along Northwest Boulevard between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive in the form of protected cycletracks on either side of the boulevard located outside of the vehicular traffic lanes. Transit Plan 20/20, Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, 2016 A Five-Year Service Plan was developed based on the existing conditions report findings and community engagement activities, including surveys, according to the following themes: upgrades to southside services, more frequent service on Leopard and Port, expanded Sunday service, more direct westside service, Downtown/North Beach route improvements, increased direct routing and frequency in Robstown, consolidated Port Aransas service, expanded Express service, and improved speed and reliability, which are organized within the report according to service types and are divided into two implementation phases. Recommended improvements address service design (i.e. direct routing, route alignment, route deviations, schedule simplicity), established performance metrics (i.e. ridership productivity, passenger loads, schedule reliability, schedule efficiency), and bus stops (i.e. accessibility, amenities, real time arrival information, etc). Transit Plan 20/20 includes recommendations to improve current service after comprehensively analyzing the strengths of the system and identifying gaps in service. The plan includes recommendations that directly impact Northwest Boulevard. Transit Plan 20/20 includes recommended improvements to Route 27, a portion of which operates along Northwest Boulevard within the study area corridor. The plan recommends rerouting Route 27 from the I-69 Access Road after looping around the Five Points Shopping Center to Northwest Boulevard before turning south onto FM 1889. The reroute will likely create additional bus stops along Northwest Boulevard and FM 1889, requiring pedestrian infrastructure to connect these potential bus stops to the existing sidewalk network. 8 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Plan Major Goals Relation to this effort Implementation Details Mobility CC, City of Corpus Christi, 2013 Of the eight policies the plan establishes, the following are relevant to the Northwest Boulevard Study Area: Policy 1: Integrate street infrastructure that provides balanced transportation options and design features into street design and construction to create safe and inviting environments for all users to walk, bicycle, and use public transportation. Policy 3: Plan and develop a comprehensive and convenient bicycle and pedestrian transportation network. Policy 6: Provide children with safe and appealing opportunities for walking and bicycling to school in order to decrease rush-hour traffic, and fossil fuel consumption, encourage exercise and healthy living habits in children, and reduce the risk of injury to children through traffic collisions near school. Policy 7: Create safe routes to parks and open spaces. This document is the transportation element of the city’s Comprehensive plan. It guides decision-making pertaining to the planning, design, operation and mainenance of the city’s transportation networks. It “houses all transportation related plans, including the City’s Thoroughfare Plan, Trails Master Plan, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Master Plan (formerly the ADA transition plan), plans for the installation of roundabouts and road diets at select locations, and plans for specific street corridors.” The Urban Transportation Plan establishes roadway classifications for the city’s streets, broadly categorized into Local Access Streets, Collectors, Arterials, and Freeways. The UTP identifies Northwest Boulevard as an “A3 Primary - Arterial Divided” urban street, indicating a 130’-wide right-of-way, up to 6 lanes of traffic, 17.5’ of distance between curb and property line, and 30,000 to 48,000 maximum average daily trips. HikeBikeCC recommends 10.26 miles of on-street and off-street facilities to comprise the Nueces River Trail, which would connect Northwest Boulvard to the river via Trinity River Drive, River Walk Drive, and a drainage corridor through the Wood River subdivision, and eastward along the river’s south bank to Labonte Park. Northwest Area Development Plan, City of Corpus Christi, 2001 Relevant Policy Statements: A) Environment. (A1): Maintain and/or improve water quality in the Nueces River - The river provides 2/3 of the City’s drinking water supply. B) Land Use. (B1e): The expansion of business uses along Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) or any other arterial street should be planned and zoned so that the traffic carrying capacity of the street is protected. West of County Road 75, commercial uses on Northwest Boulevard should only be allowed at arterial intersections. (B3): Encourage development of recreational vehicle parks in the northwest area to capture “Winter Texans” traveling U.S. 77 (IH- 69). (B5): Development along all arterial and expressways will be required to plant street trees on fifty-foot centers in a tree planting zone located within 10 feet of any property line abutting the street rights-of-way. C) Annexation. (C1): Pursue annexation of property in advance of development, particularly, along major roadways for the purpose of creating compatible land use and development patterns. (C2): Prior to annexation, develop detailed assessments of infrastructure and action plans for improving and or replacing inadequate infrastructure in outlying substandard developments. (C3): The City should aggressively pursue annexation of the developing areas within the Nueces River watershed within Nueces County. D) Transportation. (D1a): Relief of traffic congestion along Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and at the Five Points Intersection is a major focus of the plan recommendations. E) Public Services. (E3): Create a Nueces River Hike and Bike Trail system with connections to the Oso Parkway system, and schools, parks and other public facilities in the Northwest Area. The Northwest Area Development Plan componnent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan illustrates the decades- long attempt to guide transportation and land use development in an orderly manner that enhances quality of life. Specifically, it names mobility improvements around Northwest Boulevard designed to mitigate congestion of its eastern terminus at the “Five Points Intersection.” Several of these improvements remain to be funded and constructed. This plan also indicated the community's desire to improve the appearance of Northwest Boulevard through three plantings. PS D1 Recommendation a1: “Northwest Boulevard is recommended as an arterial street with an ultimate 120’ minimum right-of-way, six traffic lanes, and a median.” PS D1 Recommendation a2: “A two-lane 60-foot right-of-way loop collector street (south of Wal-Mart) is proposed between U.S. 77 and the extension of River East Drive.” PS D1 Recommendation a3: “County Road 52 is recommended as an arterial street with an ultimate 100’ minimum right-of-way, four travel lanes and a landscaped median.” Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 9 February 2021 PlanMajor Goals Relation to this effort Implementation Details Mobility CC, City of Corpus Christi, 2013 Of the eight policies the plan establishes, the following are relevant to the Northwest Boulevard Study Area: Policy 1: Integrate street infrastructure that provides balanced transportation options and design features into street design and construction to create safe and inviting environments for all users to walk, bicycle, and use public transportation. Policy 3: Plan and develop a comprehensive and convenient bicycle and pedestrian transportation network. Policy 6: Provide children with safe and appealing opportunities for walking and bicycling to school in order to decrease rush-hour traffic, and fossil fuel consumption, encourage exercise and healthy living habits in children, and reduce the risk of injury to children through traffic collisions near school. Policy 7: Create safe routes to parks and open spaces. This document is the transportation element of the city’s Comprehensive plan. It guides decision-making pertaining to the planning, design, operation and mainenance of the city’s transportation networks. It “houses all transportation related plans, including the City’s Thoroughfare Plan, Trails Master Plan, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Master Plan (formerly the ADA transition plan), plans for the installation of roundabouts and road diets at select locations, and plans for specific street corridors.” The Urban Transportation Plan establishes roadway classifications for the city’s streets, broadly categorized into Local Access Streets, Collectors, Arterials, and Freeways. The UTP identifies Northwest Boulevard as an “A3 Primary - Arterial Divided” urban street, indicating a 130’-wide right-of-way, up to 6 lanes of traffic, 17.5’ of distance between curb and property line, and 30,000 to 48,000 maximum average daily trips. HikeBikeCC recommends 10.26 miles of on-street and off-street facilities to comprise the Nueces River Trail, which would connect Northwest Boulvard to the river via Trinity River Drive, River Walk Drive, and a drainage corridor through the Wood River subdivision, and eastward along the river’s south bank to Labonte Park. Northwest Area Development Plan, City of Corpus Christi, 2001 Relevant Policy Statements: A) Environment. (A1): Maintain and/or improve water quality in the Nueces River - The river provides 2/3 of the City’s drinking water supply. B) Land Use. (B1e): The expansion of business uses along Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) or any other arterial street should be planned and zoned so that the traffic carrying capacity of the street is protected. West of County Road 75, commercial uses on Northwest Boulevard should only be allowed at arterial intersections. (B3): Encourage development of recreational vehicle parks in the northwest area to capture “Winter Texans” traveling U.S. 77 (IH- 69). (B5): Development along all arterial and expressways will be required to plant street trees on fifty-foot centers in a tree planting zone located within 10 feet of any property line abutting the street rights-of-way. C) Annexation. (C1): Pursue annexation of property in advance of development, particularly, along major roadways for the purpose of creating compatible land use and development patterns. (C2): Prior to annexation, develop detailed assessments of infrastructure and action plans for improving and or replacing inadequate infrastructure in outlying substandard developments. (C3): The City should aggressively pursue annexation of the developing areas within the Nueces River watershed within Nueces County. D) Transportation. (D1a): Relief of traffic congestion along Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and at the Five Points Intersection is a major focus of the plan recommendations. E) Public Services. (E3): Create a Nueces River Hike and Bike Trail system with connections to the Oso Parkway system, and schools, parks and other public facilities in the Northwest Area. The Northwest Area Development Plan componnent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan illustrates the decades- long attempt to guide transportation and land use development in an orderly manner that enhances quality of life. Specifically, it names mobility improvements around Northwest Boulevard designed to mitigate congestion of its eastern terminus at the “Five Points Intersection.” Several of these improvements remain to be funded and constructed. This plan also indicated the community's desire to improve the appearance of Northwest Boulevard through three plantings. PS D1 Recommendation a1: “Northwest Boulevard is recommended as an arterial street with an ultimate 120’ minimum right-of-way, six traffic lanes, and a median.” PS D1 Recommendation a2: “A two-lane 60-foot right-of-way loop collector street (south of Wal-Mart) is proposed between U.S. 77 and the extension of River East Drive.” PS D1 Recommendation a3: “County Road 52 is recommended as an arterial street with an ultimate 100’ minimum right-of-way, four travel lanes and a landscaped median.” 10 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Resident Demographics An estimated 11,000 people reside in the five Census Block Groups adjacent to the study area, as of 2019.2 This is an 8.3% increase since 2010, nearly 1% per year - just under the city's rate of 9.8%. Population growth ranged from 6.3% to 13.8% among the Block Groups to the north, west, and south of the study area, while it declined 3.1% in the neighborhood east of I-69. The median age group of residents is between 35 and 44, but residents ages 55 and over roughly make up almost a third (32.3%) of the study area population. Comparatively, in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, and Texas, residents ages 55+ only make up about a quarter of their population (27.7%, 28.1%, and 24.7%, respectively). The percent of households with children is slightly higher than the county average (43% and 36%, respectively).3 2 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. 3 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. Figure 3: Population change by Censu Block Groups Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 15%3%6%9%12%-3% -3.1% 10.0% 13.8% 6.3% 9.7% The study area contains two nursing homes, each with 120 beds: the Windsor Calallen Nursing Home and River Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation. Almost 8 in 10 residents (78.6%) live in family households compared to non-family households (21.5%) at rates higher to those of the county and state, where 68.1% of the population live in family households in Nueces and 69.6% in Texas.4 4 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 11 February 2021 Study area Study area block groups Estate residential Low-density residential Medium-density residential Mobile home Parks and open space Water Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 4: Adjacent Residential Areas, by Census Block Group 0 0.75 1.5 3 mi 69 37 37 44 4469 Northwest Blvd FM624 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 58.023 12 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 The study area is composed of predominantly white residents (90.0%), of whom almost half identify with Hispanic origin (46.6%).5 The median household income for the study area is $87,253, much higher than the median household income for Corpus Christi, which is $53,614. The average life expectancy for the census tracts in the study area is 80.5 years, 2.5 years higher than that of Nueces county and 1.7 years higher than that of Texas6, suggesting that residents have relatively high access to public health resources. The study area is majority homeowners (79%), and has a slightly higher percentage of homeowners compared to the city (70%). Since 2010, homeownership has decreased by about 3% within the study area and citywide, likely due to increases in multi-family development7. 5 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. 6 National Center for Health Statistics. U.S. Small- Area Life Expectancy Estimates Project, 2010-2015]. National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. Available from: https:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/usaleep/usaleep.html. 7 Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. Source: Calallen ISD Calallen High School, home of the Wildcats, serves 1,256 students in grades 9-12. The school is located on Northwest Boulevard, close to the I-69 intersection. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 13 February 2021 20%40%60%80%100% Renter Owner Five Block Groups Corpus Christi 78.7%21.3% 56.6%43.4% Figure 7: Tenure Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. Figure 6: Household income in the past 12 months (in 2018 inflation-adjusted dollars) 20%40%60%80%100% 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 Corpus Christi Less than $15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,00 - $149,999 $150,000 or more Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. Figure 5: Household types 20%40%60%80%100% 58.023 58.011 58.012 58.013 37.001 Corpus Christi Nueces County Texas Family households Non-family households Source: Business Analyst. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019. 14 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Existing Land Use The map in Figure 8 shows existing land uses within the study area as determined for the 2016 Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. The study area contains a wide variety of land uses, including agriculture, low- to medium- density residential, commercial, as well as many currently vacant lands. Several civic uses such as schools, colleges, and parks also reside within the study area. Land Use and Market Analysis The breadth of land uses indicate the importance of the study area across a variety of stakeholders in addition to the challenges of creating an attractive and unified corridor that accomplishes the collective vision of the City. The study area and adjacent neighborhoods have large parcels of land not fully developed; which are currently zoned as Farm Rural, Multifamily, Neighborhood Commercial, or General Commercial.8 8 City of Corpus Christi Zoning ShapefileFigure 8: Existing Land Use Map Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrSource: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 15 February 2021 City limits Agriculture (1 unit/ 5 acres) Drainage corridor Estate residential (1 unit/ 1 acre) Low-density residential (up to 8 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (8-22 units/ 1 acre) Mobile home Professional office Commercial Light industrial Park and open space Public and semi-public Vacant Future development Buildings Water 100-year floodplain 500-year floodplain 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park Future elementary school Del Mar College Walmart Five Points Shopping Center Corpus Christi Medical Center - Northwest 16 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Figure 9: Current Zoning Map Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 0 2,000 ft Study area Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Farm-Rural Light Industrial Neighborhood Office Multi-family Two-family Single-family Park and open space Water 69 Current Zoning Most of the land fronting Northwest Boulevard is zoned General Commercial, which intends to provide "sufficient space in appropriate locations for all types of commercial and service activity, particularly along arterial streets where a general mixture of such activity now exists."9 Neighborhood Commercial Districts are interspersed among the General Commercial Districts, near the center of the study area. These provide areas for commercial activity such as sale of convenience goods and personal services that primarily benefit nearby residential areas," and are usually have pedestrian access from nearby residential neighborhoods.10 9 City of Corpus Christi Unified Development Code, Section 4.5.1.D. 10 Ibid., Section 4.5.1.A. A significant amount of land within the study area and adjacent to the south and west is zoned Farm- Rural, which is intended for land that is "relatively underdeveloped and agricultural in nature." It is also "the default zoning district for land newly-annexed to the City," and therefore subject to reclassification for appropriate uses.11 Beyond the study area itself, most adjacent neighborhood zoning is for residential uses - largely for single family homes, but also including some multi-family classified parcels. 11 Ibid., Section 4.3.1.A. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 17 February 2021 Figure 10: Future Land Use Map Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 0 2,000 ft Study area High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Water 69 Future Land Use Designations PlanCC, the City's comprehensive plan, establishes a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to guide development and redevelopment for the next twenty years. It is not a zoning map, but rather a guide for decision-makers charged with making rulings on zoning and land use issues. The vision of future development in the Northwest Boulevard Corridor codified in FLUM is for a mix of uses largely anchored by commercial uses. Government close to the interstate (Calallen High School, Corpus Christi Medical Center Northwest, and Del Mar College) remain in place, while medium density residential comprises a stretch of the southern side of Northwest Boulevard west of FM 1889. A handful of parcels between FM 1889 and County Road 69 do not have FLUM designations. 18 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Housing Stock The neighborhoods adjacent to the Study Area are primarily single-family residential. These neighborhoods contain mostly single-family detached homes, but also includes multi-family, condos, and the Windsor Calallen Nursing home, which has 120 beds, or 60 rooms. There is one recent multi-family development, the Calallen Apartments, and one planned multi-family development just south of the new Calallen apartments. There is one planned single-family development, called River Ridge Unit 4. South of Northwest Boulevard, this proposed 136 lot development sits north of County Road 52, east of County Road 69, and at the extension of Riverside Boulevard. Businesses The study area is home to approximately 140 businesses and 1,450 employees.12 As a commercial corridor, commercial and retail businesses are located immediately off Northwest Boulevard’s right-of-way, surrounded by residential neighborhoods, and most of the corridor’s businesses are clustered on the east side of the study area, supporting regional demand from Interstate 69. Businesses serving regional demand include banks, big box retail like Walmart and the Five Points Shopping Center, fast food restaurants, restaurant chains, and medical facilities. Services and local businesses serving the surrounding neighborhoods include local cafes and restaurants. Restaurants and schools employ the most workers: 2005 and 200, respectively. Despite the high number of jobs in the study area and adjacent neighborhoods (4,934),13 the majority of residents commute elsewhere for employment. Approximately 601 out of 4,558 employed residents live and work within the study area’s adjacent neighborhoods, resulting in 4,333 employees commuting into the study area from other parts of the Corpus Christi area. This daily inflow and outflow has a large impact on traffic, especially during peak travel hours. More traffic analysis will be discussed in the following Transportation Section. 12 Business Analyst. Copyright 2019 Infogroup, Inc. Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2019. 13 OnTheMap, U.S. Census LODES data, 2017 Typology Parcels Land Area Appraised value Single-family 360 83.3%78.4% Mobile homes 6 2.4%0.2% Condominiums 8 1.7%1.2% Multi-family 2 5.7%11.8% Two-family 1 0.2%0.2% Four- or more-family 1 0.4%0.4% Townhouses 9 5.4%7.7% Vacant residential land 6 1.0%0.2% Figure 11: Housing typology within 500’ buffer Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019.Regional Opportunity (9) k k kk k k Crop out this box in Indesign ¯0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125 Miles CENTENNIAL PARKWAY U p p e r L a s V e g a s W a s h T r a i l E DEER SPRINGS WAY BRUCE WOODBURY BELTWAY VA Healthcare System Job Creation ZoneHigh School YMCA Elementary Schools Elementary School Elementary School Middle and Elementary School Middle SchoolPark N COMMERCE STWALNUT RD' 601 4,333 3,957 Figure 12: Workers Inflow and Outflow, 2017 Source: OnTheMap U.S Census LODES data, 2017 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 19 February 2021 Figure 13: Business Industry and Employees Map Study area No. of Employees 0-10 11-25 26-50 51+ Source: Business Analyst (ESRI 2019); City of Corpus Christi GIS Services 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft SIC Code Business Industry Number of Businesses Number of Employees Sales Volume Retail (Eating & Drinking Places, Food Stores, General Merchandise Stores, Gas Stations, Apparel & Accessory Stores) 43 606 $162,029,000 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 16 95 $30,107,000 Services (Health Services, Motion Pictures & Amusements, Educational Institutions & Libraries, Automotive Services) 49 539 $93,334,000 Other (Agriculture, Construction, Transportation)31 210 $54,044,000 Figure 14: SIC type and employee count (2019) within 500’ buffer Source: Business Analyst (ESRI 2019) Business Industry Retail (Eating & Drinking Places, Food Stores, General Merchandise Stores, Gas Stations, Apparel & Accessory Stores) Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Services (Health Services, Motion Pictures & Amusements, Educational Institutions & Libraries, Automotive Services) Other (Agriculture, Construction, Transportation) Figure 12: Workers Inflow and Outflow, 2017 20 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Retail Market Analysis Approximately 60,000 people live within a 15-minute driving distance of the center of the Northwest Boulevard study area, which encompasses the towns of Odem and Edroy to the north, Robstown to the south, and neighborhoods adjacent to the Leopard Street corridor eastward to US Highway 358. Households within this "primary trade area" had an estimated median disposable income of $47,543 and total disposable income of $1.28 billion in 2019. The population grew by over 5,000 since 2010 - an annual rate of about 1%. At this rate, the population will grow by about 2,900 by 202414. While the study area offers many shopping opportunities, analysis of sales by retail category within the primary trade area suggest that residents within the area are leaving it to make purchases. These categories and their leakage amounts are: Food & Beverage Stores: $56.7 million15 This category includes grocery stores of all sizes, specialty food stores, and beer, wine and liquor stores. This figure represents about half of the total resident demand for grocery purchases within the primary trade area, meaning that the current supply of grocery stores could double in number or size to meet just resident demand within the trade area. General merchandise Stores: $30.5 million This category includes "big box" discount stores such as Walmart, smaller "dollar" stores such as Dollar General, and chain pharmacies. Each of these are found on the eastern side of the study area. This represents 28% of overall resident demand, indicating that existing general merchandise stores meet a greater share of demand for their products than grocery stores do. 14 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024. 15 Source: Esri and Infogroup. Esri 2019 Updated Demographics. Esri 2017 Retail MarketPlace. Primary Trade Area Figure 15: Primary Trade Area Study area 15-minute drive area Source: Business Analyst. Copyright 2019 Infogroup, Inc. 69 37 37 44 Clothing & Accessories Stores: $19.0 million This includes clothes, shoes, and jewelry. This amount represents two thirds of total resident demand for clothing stores. Thus, while the total leakage value is lower than grocery and general mechandise leakage, this category is comparatively less saturated within the primary trade area. Health and Personal Care Stores: $17.5 million Trade area residents spend $36.5 million on health and personal care stores, but study area retailers sell only $19 million in products and services, which means residents are spending nearly that same amount outside the trade area. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 21 February 2021 Some retail categories within the trade area sell more goods and services than its residents consume. This means people are traveling from outside the trade area to make these purchases, indicating that these sectors are already strong attractors, and do not require recruitment to locate within the study area and meet residents needs. These categories and their suplus sales amounts are: Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers: $139.5 million Sales within this category are twice the demand among trade area residents. The cluster of car dealerships along the US Hwy. 77/I-69 corridorr south of the study area contributes to the large supply of this category within the primary trade area. Gasoline Stations: $27.9 million Trade area residents spend $64.3 million per year at gasoline stations, yet area stations sell $92.2 million. Restaurants: $14.9 million It is common among trade areas that experience high levels of commuters to experience higher restaurant sales than area residents demand. This surplus may be the result of commuters to the area's numerous employment centers, such as schools and the medical center, going out for lunch or dinner. Above: Retailers at the Five Points Shopping Center located near I-67 offer a mix of clothing, general merchandise, and home goods and crafts. Source: Google Streetview, August 2015 Below: A neighborhood retail strip shopping center featuring a new Starbucks location recently opened at County Road 69. Source: Google Streetview, April 2019 22 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Commercial Characteristics The study area has large parcels not fully developed; roughly 1.5 million square feet is vacant parcels zoned commercial (General Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, and Neighborhood Office). Commercial parcels vary largely in size. The majority of commercial properties range between 20,000 and 60,000 square feet. Figure 16: Vacant commercial parcel zoningPercent of Land within 500’ buffer General Commercial 39.2% Neighborhood Comercial 45.5% Neighborhood Office 13.3% Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. All other land 71% Public/ institutional 10% AI Development Inc. 7% Lontos Katherin 6% Robertson Kevin E ET UX 5% Figure 17: Major ownershipPercent of Land within 500’ buffer Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. Land Ownership Given its large amount of vacant land, the study area is well-positioned to contribute to the city’s economic development through the development of a live-work environment. A handful of landowners in the area own 56% of the available vacant land ripe for development, or 29% of the entire study area. 10% of the study area is owned by the City and the Callalan ISD, and those properties are already developed or have development plans in place. Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 23 February 2021 Catalytic Development Sites Catalytic development sites, indicated on the following page, are located where development can fulfill city and corridor goals, including job creation, improved transportation and access, or new housing units. A common issue that complicates development within this corridor is the location of oil and gas pipelines. Some pipelines are abandoned, but others remain active. The unreliability of survey data adds risk and cost to upcoming development. A high level review of the following attributes were considered in the analysis of land for catalytic development viability: • Existing zoning • Proximity to higher traffic volumes • Adjacent to development for cost-effective utilization of existing utilities • Size of site • Adjacency to Northwest Boulevard 24 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Figure 18: Redevelopment Map 2 1 3 5 4 Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrStudy area Parcels Vacant Commercial Parcels In platting/construction process Catalytic Development Sites Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Ownership Lontos Katherine Al Development Inc Robertson Kevin E ET UX Public/ Institutional Future HEB grocery Future apartments The Lakes at Northwest Restaurants Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 25 February 2021 Map Key Likelihood to Change Zoning Future Land Use Acreage Traffic Volume 1 High CN-2 “Neighborhood Commercial”Commercial 8.907 32,502 2 Very High FR “Farm Rural”Mixed Use 10 32,502 3 Very High FR “Farm Rural”Mixed Use 5 32,502 4 Moderate CN-1 Neighborhood Commercial N/A 3.95 23,361 5 Moderate CN-1 Neighborhood Commercial N/A 4.22 23,361 Figure 19: Catalytic development sites Source: Nueces County Appraisal District, 2019. 2 1 3 5 4 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park Future elementary school Office Office and Small Retail 26 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Transportation Analysis Traffic Volumes The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes for vehicles in the Northwest Boulevard study area in 2018 are illustrated in the map on the following page. Moving eastward along Northwest Boulevard from County Road 73 to its eastern terminus at Interstate I-69, the AADT ranges from 23,361 to 33,512 auto vehicles each day utilizing the corridor. Auto traffic volumes are higher in the eastern portion of the study area, as expected, given the proximity to Interstate I-69 and concentration of intense land uses. Two traffic count locations (E and F on Figure 20) located along Interstate 69 have traffic volumes between 45,000 and 62,000 vehicles. Traffic volumes on roads terminating onto Northwest Boulevard are lower; fewer than 10,000 vehicles currently travel on FM 1889 daily. A 20-year trend analysis for the traffic count locations in the study area indicates that the daily traffic volumes along Northwest Boulevard are similar in 2018 to those traffic volumes collected in 1999. FM 1889 has experienced the most stable traffic volumes during this 20-year period, with traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard fluctuating by as much as 10,000 vehicles per day between the highest and lowest traffic volume counts. Beginning in 2007 at the start of the Great Recession, traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard declined before starting to grow again in 2010; in 2018 traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard were similar to 2007 volumes. Traffic volumes have fluctuated widely along Interstate 69 in the study area, with traffic volumes doubling from 30,000 to over 60,000 between 2013 and 2018. Much of this fluctuation is a direct result of construction-related impacts on Interstate 69. Pedestrians and cyclists are not included in this count; the Figure 20: 20-Year AADT Trends for Study Area Count Locations 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 19992018200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017Count Location A Count Location B Count Location C Count Location D Count Location E Count Location F Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 27 February 2021 Figure 21: Average Annual Daily Traffic Counts, 2018 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ft C D E FA B Source: Texas Department of Transportation GIS Services Study area Count Location A - 6,026 Count Location B- 23,361 Count Location C - 32,502 Count Location D - 33,512 Count Location E - 45,751 Count Location F - 62,090 Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan includes case studies of cities that have conducted bicycle counts and recommends bicycle counts be conducted for performance measures. A steady, incremental increase of traffic volumes on Northwest Boulevard was expected based on the 20 year AADT trends. However, taking the evidence of the decline of traffic in the Great Recession, it is unclear how the COVID 19 crisis will impact long term trends on the corridor. Land use changes that are expected to contribute to the increase of traffic volumes include the construction of restaurants and limited retail in the western half of the study area at County Roads 73 and 69, in addition to a residential development west of FM 1889. The possible construction of a new H-E-B store at FM 1889 and Northwest Boulevard would likely increase traffic volumes along both segments. Although there is no bicycle or pedestrian count data available for this segment of Northwest Boulevard, newer residential and retail and restaurant uses will likely increase demand for biking and walking facilities in the study area. Students living in the recently completed Calallen Apartments at FM 1889 and future students living in The Lakes at Northwest subdivision under construction will need safe infrastructure for both traveling along Northwest Boulevard and crossing the five-lane roadway to access area schools on foot or by bike. 28 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Transit The Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Agency (CCRTA) operates one local fixed bus route, Route 27, serving a portion of Northwest Boulevard. Route 27, the second longest route in the CCRTA system,16 runs from downtown Corpus Christi westward along Leopard Street and then south along the I-69 Access Road/US-77 to Robstown multiple times daily. Route 27 also operates in tandem with two Parks and Recreation services. One Park- and-Ride at the Robstown Transfer Station in Robstown, located at Avenue A and 4th Street, has a maximum 16 Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Transit Plan 20/20, 2016. Figure 22: Bus Stops and Bus Routes 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ftSource: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Study area Bus Stop Route 27 (existing) Route 27 (proposed) Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels capacity of 33 parking spaces. The second Park-and-Ride in Annaville is located between IH-37 and Leopard Street immediately west of the Rehfeld Road intersection with a maximum capacity of 75 parking spaces. Both the southbound or outbound trips and the north bound or inbound trips northbound and southbound routes create a short loop around the Five Points Shopping Center, which experiences high ridership, utilizing Northwest Boulevard, Wildcat Drive, and Teague Lane. Five bus stops serving Route 27 are within the Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 29 February 2021 Source: Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Transit Plan 20/20, 2016. Figure 23: Recommended Route 27 Reroutestudy area boundaries, with one bus stop directly along Northwest Boulevard just east of Wildcat Drive. One of the reasons why ridership is high on this route along this segment is because Route 27 maintains the same schedule and route alignment on the weekends instead of consolidating the route or operating across a shorter window of service. The CCRTA Transit Plan 20/20 recommends changes to the Route 27 alignment to “serve additional commercial development along FM 624."17 The suggested reroute will 17 Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Transit Plan 20/20, 2016. 30 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 continue west along Northwest Boulevard and turn on to FM 1889 to reach Robstown Station, rather than by travelling on US Highway 77. Findings from interviews conducted with bus operators as part of the Transit Plan 20/20 indicated that there may be pent up demand for Route 27, especially on weekend mornings,as evidenced by standing-room only conditions. Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 7337 69 358 181 Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrStudy area Fatal Crash Suspected Serious Injury Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Figure 24: Crash Locations and Injury Severity, 2018 - 2019 0 1 2 4 mi Non-Incapacitating Injury Possible Injury No Injury Unknown Severity Traffic Safety Between 2018 and 2019, there were 272 collisions in the study area corridor involving 579 parties. These crashes resulted in 3 deaths, 4 suspected serious injuries, 12 crashes with non-incapacitating injuries, 60 crashes Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 31 February 2021 No Injury Unknown Severity 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels involving possible injury, 188 collisions in which no one was injured, and 5 collisions with unknown severity. Mapping the locations of the collisions shows that the vast majority of crashes in the study corridor occur east of Wildcat Drive along Northwest Boulevard and along I-69. When overlayed the curb cut locations shown in Figure 29, the locations of these crashes correspond 32 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 with the locations of driveways to the commercial and institutional parcels along Northwest Boulevard. A survey of corridor images shows that nearly every curb cut, or driveway, lacks any directional signage in the form of posted stop signs or painted stop bars for motorists, indicating that drivers may not be yielding ample right-of- way time before making turning movements. Of these 272 incidents, 266 or 98% of collisions involved only motor vehicles. There was one bike-related and four pedestrian-related collisions with motor vehicles along Northwest Boulevard, with an additional “no contact” collision listed in the crash report data. While the overall number of collisions involving both motor vehicles and people biking and walking were low, these were among the deadliest collisions. The three fatal collisions in the corridor between 2018 and 2019 resulted in the death of one cyclist and two pedestrians. The remaining two pedestrian-vehicle collisions in the corridor during this time period resulted in non-incapacitating injuries. Every pedestrian-vehicle collision occurred near an intersection (River Trail Drive, FM 1889, and Interstate 69E), with the former two pedestrian-vehicle collisions at unsignalized intersections and the latter two pedestrian- vehicle collisions at signalized intersections with marked crosswalks. The crash report data notes from police reports cited that the contributing factor in every pedestrian-vehicle crash was the “pedestrian [failure] to yield right of way to vehicle,” indicating that safer, formalized pedestrian crossings of Northwest Boulevard are needed for pedestrians since 50% of these collisions resulted in the death of pedestrians. The presence of sidewalks and traffic signals is discussed below under “Pedestrian and Bicycling Infrastructure.” There was no contributing factor listed in the police report for the bicycle-vehicle collision, although the driver was reported as “going straight” along Northwest Boulevard. News reports of the bicyclist fatality describe the incident as a hit-and-run since the driver did not stop; the 30-year- old victim was traveling south on Northwest Boulevard before being struck at approximately 7:00 a.m. on a weekday morning18. With a posted speed limit of 50 miles 18 ABC News, Kiii TV South Texas, CCPD identify Figure 25: Northwest Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes 69Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRiver Hills Country Club Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 2,000 ftSource: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services Study area Fatal Crash Non-Incapacitating Injury Bicycle Collision Pedestrian Collision Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 33 February 2021 Schools Buildings Parcels per hour and traffic volume exceeding 30,000 vehicles daily, any recommended bikeway for this corridor will be either separated or off-street for maximum user safety. Existing bikeway conditions are discussed below under “Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure.” Roadway Geometry Between CR 73 and River Hill Drive (a 1.5 mile length), Northwest Boulevard is 5 lanes across with two driving lanes in each direction, a center turning lane, and a wide shoulder on either side. Between River Hill Drive and Wildcat Drive (1 mile length), Northwest Boulevard retains two driving lanes in each direction, with the center turning lane punctuated by medians to protect left-turning drivers from oncoming traffic. East of Wildcat Drive (0.3 mile length), Northwest Boulevard expands to three driving lanes in each direction with a median-protected center turn lane. At the intersection with Interstate 69E, there are three westbound driving lanes and the eastbound traffic is divided between one left-turn only lane, a shared left-turn and through lane, a through lane only, and a right-turn only lane. body found along FM 624 in northwest Corpus Christi, July 24,2019. Accessed April 15, 2020. Figure 26: Northwest Boulevard from CR 73 to River Hill Drive 34 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Figure 27: Northwest Boulevard at Riverside Boulevard Figure 28: Northwest Boulevard at Interstate 69E Access Road Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 35 February 2021 Pedestrian and Bicycling Infrastructure No sidewalks are present for most of the length of Northwest Boulevard in the study area. Sidewalks are present directly along Northwest Boulevard on the northside between Calallen High School campus and Interstate 69E and on the southside between Wildcat Drive and Interstate 69E. The sidewalk on Calallen High School campus is approximately six feet wide and separated from auto traffic by a drainage ditch. This segment is the only sidewalk in the study area corridor along Northwest Boulevard that has any shade and this limited shade is provided by the canopy of trees planted on campus. East of Wildcat Drive, the existing sidewalks are immediately adjacent to the roadway with no landscaping or vegetative buffer between pedestrians and vehicles. These sidewalks are approximately six feet wide and cross at least half a dozen driveways on each side of Northwest Boulevard with no crosswalk markings, painted stop bars, or stops signs for any of these driveways with the exception of Chick-fil-A, which has a painted stop bar and stop sign at its driveway. Residential sidewalks are present in the subdivided neighborhood areas immediately adjacent school campuses,The Lakes at Northwest on FM 1889 south Northwest Boulevard, and the neighborhood south of Northwest Boulevard and Calallen High School. There is generally shade provided by trees along these sidewalks except for The Lakes at Northwest since this is a newer subdivision replanted with younger, smaller trees. However, there is no direct pedestrian connection between the neighborhood surrounding Wood River Elementary School and the neighborhood adjacent Calallen High School. Older students residing in the Wood River neighborhood have no formalized pedestrian connection to Calallen High School, which is approximately one mile away for about half of the neighborhood. Eight signalized intersections are within the study area: at Interstate 69E, Wildcat Drive, River East Drive, FM 69, River Hill Drive, FM 1889/Trinity River Drive, Wood River Drive, and CR 73. Marked crosswalks serve pedestrians in all directions at the Northwest Boulevard intersections with Wildcat Drive, River East Drive, and CR 69. At the River Hill Drive, a marked crosswalk serves pedestrians crossing River Hill Drive on the north side of the intersection. At the Trinity River Drive/FM 1889 intersection, crosswalks are marked across Northwest Boulevard on the west side of the intersection and across Trinity River Drive. The intersections of Northwest Boulevard at CR 73 or at Wood River Drive do not provide any marked crosswalks. While people may ride bikes on Northwest Boulevard’s 36 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrStudy area Mobility CC Recommendations Off-street bikeways On-street bikeways Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility Recommendations Bike Boulevard Buffered Bike Lane Off-road Multi-use Trail 1-way Cycle Track (both sides) Figure 29: Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Existing sidewalks Driveway Signalized Intersection Parks and open space Schools Buildings Parcels Source: City of Corpus Christi GIS Services, CCMPO, Bicycle Mobility Plan, 2018 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 37 February 2021 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Ri v e r w o o d D r 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Northwest Park 38 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan February 2021 shoulders west of River E Drive, no formal bicycling facilities are available throughout the study area. The 2018 Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility recommends a cycletrack on either side of Northwest Boulevard between Wildcat Drive and River Hill Drive, which would connect the Wood River neighborhood to the Five Points Shopping Center. The 2013 Mobility CC plan from the City’s Comprehensive Figure 30: Recommended Bikeways from the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility Source: CCMPO, Bicycle Mobility Plan. 2018 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan 39 February 2021 Figure 30: Recommended Bikeways from the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility: Phase 1 Bicycle Mobility Figure 31: Proposed Nueces River Hike and Bike Trail Plan also recommends a hike and bike trail along the Nueces River, which has the opportunity to connect to the proposed Phase 1 off-road multi-use trail along the Wood River ditch and/or with the proposed bike boulevard along Northwest Trail in the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility. Although outside the study area corridor, this hike and bike trail could provide a separated bikeway facility as a recreational amenity for study area residents and workers. Source: City of Corpus Christi, Mobility CC Plan, 2013 Northwest Boulevard (FM 624) Corridor Plan City Council Hearing March 16, 2021 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW | Study Area Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 7337 69 358 181 Corpus Christi Bay Nueces Bay Wood River Elementary School Wood River Dr0 1 2 4 mi Nueces RiverHazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Northwest Park Calallen High School Wilma Magee Elementary School 69 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 690 500 1,000 2,000 ft 2020 March April May June July August Phase 1: Understand 1 Phase 2: Envision 2 1 Phase 3: Act 3 2 3 PROJECT OVERVIEW | Timeline Advisory Committee Meeting Public Input Meeting 4 VISION & GOALS VISION Northwest Boulevard is Calallen’s “Main Street,” providing the amenities of a prosperous neighborhood center in a small, tight-knit community. The Boulevard is a welcoming, diverse, and family-friendly place where people go to shop, gather, invest in businesses, play and raise a family. Safe, accessible and easy for people of all ages and abilities to get around. »Congestion is less frequent, making it easier for people to get around and navigate the neighborhood. »Traffic is calmed, making it safer for people to drive, walk across, and bike along the boulevard. »Streets and sidewalks are accessible, built to ADA standards. Prosperous, with a strong local economy anchored by small businesses »A variety of neighborhood restaurants and retail outlets offer a diverse array of goods, services, and family-friendly experiences »Businesses can receive support and incentives from public entities to recover from loss of income Healthy for people and nature, with opportunities to be active outdoors. »Trees and vegetation provide shade and help drain stormwater »Trails are easily accessible for walking, hiking and biking Attractive and orderly, with new development that fits into a cohesive whole »Public infrastructure is expanded to areas planned for development »Public art and neighborhood branding convey a sense of place and beautify the public realm. »Wayfinding signage draws attention to neighborhood attractions and guides visitors »Regulation of commercial signage ensures a consistent, physical appearance along the Boulevard GOALS Northwest Blvd FM624 E Riverview StFM 1889County Rd 73Wood River Elementary School Wood River DrE A Es 5 CONCEPT PLAN | Overview Intersection Enhancements A FM 1889 B CR 69 C Wildcat Drive D US Hwy 77 Traffic Circulation Partnerships E Grocery and Neighborhood retail F Calallen Elementary and High School Active Transportation Enhancements Sidepaths Buffered bike lanes Shared lane markings Proposed Future Land Use Study area Parks and open space Water City Boundary High-density residen-tial (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residen- tial (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned develop- ment Public Art Opportunity Gateway Public Art Art Attraction u Crosswalk Art S Mural Art Opportunity s SuR 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Wilma Magee Elementary School Calallen High School Leopar d St Calallen Elementary School B F DC s u u R S 0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Mixed use Commercial 6 2 4 8 5 6 7 3 9 1 High Visibility Crosswalks Pedestrian Countdown Signals Pedestrian Refuge Island Sidepath Landscaped Median Reduced lane widths Shade Trees and planting area Pedestrian Lighting and Street Banners Curb extensions on cross streets CONCEPT PLAN | Model Design for Northwest Blvd 7 TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES | Overview 1. Reduce Congestion at I-69 2. Improve Intersections for Safety and Mobility 3. Build active infrastructure along roadways 4. Coordinate with ISD to manage traffic demand 8 TRANSPORTATION | Reduce Congestion at I-69 Single Point Urban Interchanges (SPUI): »Condense two signalized intersections into a single intersection with one set of traffic signals »Improve efficiency and traffic flow »Utilize less right-of-way than over interchange typologies, such as clover leaf designs Phoenix, AZ 51st Street Roundabout, Austin. Multilane Roundabouts: »Unsignalized, circular intersection »Traffic travels in the same direction around a central median in two or more lanes to accommodate exits from the outer lane 9 TRANSPORTATION | Improve Intersections for Safety and Mobility Study area Fatal Crash Non-Incapacitating Injury Bicycle Collision Pedestrian Collision Northwest Blvd FM624 County Rd 69FM1889County Rd 73FM624/I-69 InterchangeFM624/CR69FM624/FM1889FM624/River Trail Dr Intersection Enhancements FM 1889 Ped. countdown signals, crosswalks, curb extensions, ped. refuge island CR 69 Ped. countdown signals, raised crosswalk, curb extensions, ped. refuge island Wildcat Drive Ped. countdown signals, raised crosswalk, curb extensions, ped. refuge island US Hwy 77 Ped. countdown signals; high-visibility crosswalks; ped. refuge island. 10 TRANSPORTATION | Build Active Infrastructure Sidewalk Sidepath Northwest Blvd FM624 County Rd 69FM1889County Rd 73Hazel Bazemore Park River Hills Country Club Buffered Bike LaneSidepath Shared Lane Markings Buffered Bike Lane Shared Lane Markings Study area Parks and open space Schools 11 LAND USE STRATEGIES | Overview 1. Adopt Future Land Use Map Amendment 2. Relax zoning restrictions for businesses adapting to COVID 3. When funding becomes available, continue to provide small business programs that target the long-term impacts of COVID-19 0 2,000 ft 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces River Ri v e r w o o d D r Study area City Boundary High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Water 12 LAND USE | Existing Future Land Use Map 0 2,000 ft 69 Northwest Blvd FM624 Northwest Blvd FM624E Riverview StFM 1889Wildcat DrCounty Rd 69County Rd 73Nueces RiverRi v e r w o o d D r Study area City Boundary High-density residential (more than 13 units/ acre) Low-density residential (up to 3 units/ acre) Medium-density residential (4-13 units/ acre, including two-family dwellings) Mixed use Commercial Light industrial Permanent open space Government Vacant Planned development Water Convert “Mixed Use” to “Medium-density residential.” Convert “Commercial,” “High-density residential,” “Government” and undesignated to “Mixed Use” Convert “Low Density Residential” to "Government" Convert "Low-density Residential" to “Medium-density residential” Convert "Commercial" and "Low-density residential" to "Mixed Use" 13 LAND USE | Proposed Future Land Use Map 14 STREETSCAPE | Overview 1. Reduce lane widths 2. Enhance planting areas 3. Expand and plant medians 4. Design and install signage and banners 5. Install Public Art 15 STREETSCAPE | Reduce Lane Widths No pedestrian or bicycling infrastructure Hardscaped medians Wide lanes Limited safe crossings FM 624 Eastbound near Riverwood Drive. Reduced lane widths 16 Planting areas STREETSCAPE | Enhance Planting Areas Duplantis Design Group 17 BENEFITS • Less conflict with vehicles along roadway and planting • More control over type of planting within median • Prioritize funding for pedestrian realm • Provide shade for pedestrian and cyclists • Low Maintenance by using native species and reduction of tree generated debris on roadway CONS • Limited shade on roadway Ornamental Grasses and perennials 18” Offset for maintenance safety and reduce plant over roadway STREETSCAPE | Expand and Plant Medians Ornamental Grasses and perennials 18” Offset for mainteance safety and reduce plant over roadway Wildflower plantings on medians. Structured plantings on medians. Structured plantings on medians with trees. 18 STREETSCAPE | Street Signs Street Signs Street Overhead Signage Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Option 2 Option 3 Option 3 Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Blvd Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Northwest Boulevard Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Five Points Labonte Park Calallen High School Hazel Bazemore Park Existing Underpass ConditionsToronto Underpass Park. Underpass Art Crosswalks near Calallen HSCrosswalks in Lima Crosswalk Art 19 STREETSCAPE | Install Public Art Existing Hobby Lobby WallHistoric Walker Lake Mural Mural Riverwood DriveGlass totems in Cathedral Square Sculpture Installation 20 IMPLEMENTATION »All strategies includes recommended actions and responsible entities »Implementation actors go beyond the City of Corpus Christi »TXDOT »Metropolitan Planning Organization »Regional Transit Authority »Calallen ISD »Nueces County »Northwest Business Association 21 THANK YOU! Matt Rufo, AICPProject Manager, Asakura Robinsonmatt@asakurarobinson.com504-301-5542 DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Jeffrey Edmonds, Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Eddie Houlihan, Director of Management and Budget eddieho@cctexas.com (361) 826-3792 CAPTION: One-reading ordinance amending the FY 2020 – 2021 Capital Budget to include Bond 2020 Propositions A, B, and C; appropriating $75,000,000 to the Capital Budget, and amending the Capital Improvement Program by adding 42 Bond 2020 Program projects. SUMMARY: This ordinance amends the FY2020 – 2021 Capital Budget to appropriate $75,000,000 in revenues and expenditures. Additionally, amending the Capital Improvement Program to include 22 Proposition A Street projects, 18 Proposition B Park and Recreation projects, and 2 Proposition C Public Safety projects that were approved in Bond 2020 Program. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On November 3, 2020, voters approved the Bond 2020 Program for $75 million consisting of 42 projects. The City’s FY2020 – 2021 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) were approved on September 15, 2020, prior to the Bond 2020 approval. Therefore, the City’s Capital Budget and CIP does not include the Bond 2020 Program funds and projects. This Council action item will amend the Capital Budget to include the $75 million and CIP with the approved Bond 2020 projects. The Capital Budget will be amended to include the following propositions, projects, and appropriate their respective budget. Proposition A – Streets  22 Projects – $61 million  This proposition includes the designing, demolishing, constructing, renovating, improving, Ordinance Amending the FY2020 – 2021 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Program Bond 2020 Propositions A, B, and C Projects AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 extending, and making permanent streets, sidewalk, drainage, and any related improvements. Proposition B – Parks  18 Projects - $12 million  This proposition includes the designing, demolishing, constructing, renovating, improve, expanding and equipping park and recreational facilities. Proposition C – Public Safety  2 Projects - $2 million  This proposition includes the designing, demolishing, constructing, renovating, improving and equipping public safety facilities. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is not to amend the Capital Budget and the CIP. This would delay the implementation of the Bond Projects. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for FY2021 is appropriating $75,000,000 and increasing revenues and expenditures by $75,000,000. FUNDING DETAIL: Refer to Exhibit A for specific funding information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to amend the FY 2020-2021 Capital Budget and add the projects to the Capital Improvement Plan. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Exhibit A – List of Bond Projects One-reading ordinance amending the FY2020 – 2021 Capital Budget to include Bond 2020 Propositions A, B, and C; appropriating $75,000,000 to the Capital Budget, and amending the Capital Improvement Program by adding 42 Bond 2020 Program projects. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The Corpus Christi FY2020-2021 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 032203 is amended to appropriate $75,000,000 and increase revenues and expenditures by $75,000,000. SECTION 2. The Corpus Christi FY2020-2021 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 032203 is amended to add 22 Proposition A street projects, 18 Proposition B park and recreation projects and 2 Proposition C public safety projects that were approved in Bond 2020, shown in Exhibit A. SECTION 3. Upon the written request of the Mayor or majority of the members of the Council, copy attached, the City Council: (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs; and (2) suspends the City Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure on this the ______ day of ________________, 2021. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor day of , 2021 Corpus Christi, Texas PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2021. TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Paulette M. Guajardo Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo ________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ Project Number Project Name Fund Activity Proposition Budget 21045 Comanche (Carancahua to Alameda)3558 210453558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,500,000 21046 Frontier (McKinzie to Rockwood)3558 210463558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,500,000 21047 Hearn (Callicoatte to Dead End)3558 210473558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,100,000 21048 Wildcat (FM624 to Teague)3558 210483558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,500,000 21049 Trinity River (FM624 to Wood River)3558 210493558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,400,000 21050 Brownlee (Staples to Morgan)3558 210503558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,700,000 21051 Alameda (Texan Trail to Chamberlain)3558 210513558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $6,300,000 21052 Everhart (Staples to McArdle)3558 210523558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,300,000 21053 Airport (Morgan to Horne)3558 210533558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,800,000 21054 Carroll (Holly to Dead End)3558 210543558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,800,000 21055 Flato (Bates to Bear)3558 210553558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,200,000 21056 Everhart (Alameda to Staples)3558 210563558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,300,000 21057 Waldron (SPID to Purdue)3558 210573558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $3,950,000 21058 Jackfish (End to Aquarius to Park Rd 22)3558 210583558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $900,000 21059 Park Rd 22 (Compass to Park Rd 22)3558 210593558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $300,000 21060 Park Rd 22 - South Access Rd (Commodore to Jackfish)3558 210603558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $1,600,000 21061 Encantada (Encantada to Nueces County Park)3558 210613558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $650,000 21062 Beach Access Rd No. 3 (SH361 to Beach)3558 210623558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $400,000 21063 Lipes (Sunwood to Staples)3558 210633558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $3,100,000 21064 Rodd Field (Yorktown to Adler)3558 210643558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,800,000 21065 Strasbourg (Grenoble to Marseille)3558 210653558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,000,000 21066 Yorktown (Rodd Field to Oso Creek Bridge) Design Only 3558 210663558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $1,900,000 21067 McNorton Park 3296 210673296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21068 Brookhill Park 3296 210683296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21069 Academy Park 3296 210693296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21070 Cupier Park 3296 210703296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21071 Sherwood Park 3296 210713296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21072 Sam Houston Park 3296 210723296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21073 Temple Park 3296 210733296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21074 Windsor Park 3296 210743296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21075 Retta Park 3296 210753296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21076 Douden Park 3296 210763296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21077 Crossgate Park 3296 210773296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21078 Brighton Park 3296 210783296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21079 Brandywine Park 3296 210793296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21080 Capt. Falcon Park 3296 210803296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 21081 Texas State Aquarium-Rescue Center 3296 210813296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $3,000,000 21082 North Beach Restroom & Parking Facilities 3296 210823296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $2,500,000 21083 Bill Witt City Park - Pool & Facilities (Design)3296 210833296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $1,000,000 21084 West Guth Park 3296 210843296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $2,000,000 21085 Fire Station No. 3 (Land Acquisition and Design Only)3193 210853193EXP Bond 2020 - Prop C $750,000 21086 Police Training Academy (Design Only)3344 210863344EXP Bond 2020 - Prop C $1,250,000 $75,000,000 BOND 2020 Project Number Project Name Fund Activity Proposition Budget Estimated Design Start Date Estimated Construction Start Date 21045 Comanche (Carancahua to Alameda)3558 210453558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,500,000 8/15/2021 9/9/2022 21046 Frontier (McKinzie to Rockwood)3558 210463558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,500,000 4/1/2021 1/25/2022 21047 Hearn (Callicoatte to Dead End)3558 210473558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,100,000 8/1/2021 6/27/2022 21048 Wildcat (FM624 to Teague)3558 210483558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,500,000 4/1/2021 4/26/2022 21049 Trinity River (FM624 to Wood River)3558 210493558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,400,000 7/1/2021 5/27/2022 21050 Brownlee (Staples to Morgan)3558 210503558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,700,000 9/15/2021 12/9/2022 21051 Alameda (Texan Trail to Chamberlain)3558 210513558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $6,300,000 4/15/2021 7/9/2022 21052 Everhart (Staples to McArdle)3558 210523558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,300,000 5/1/2021 7/25/2022 21053 Airport (Morgan to Horne)3558 210533558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,800,000 10/1/2021 12/25/2022 21054 Carroll (Holly to Dead End)3558 210543558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,800,000 6/1/2021 8/25/2022 21055 Flato (Bates to Bear)3558 210553558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,200,000 6/15/2021 7/10/2022 21056 Everhart (Alameda to Staples)3558 210563558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,300,000 5/15/2021 8/8/2022 21057 Waldron (SPID to Purdue)3558 210573558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $3,950,000 3/15/2021 4/9/2022 21058 Jackfish (End to Aquarius to Park Rd 22)3558 210583558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $900,000 6/15/2021 3/12/2022 21059 Park Rd 22 (Compass to Park Rd 22)3558 210593558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $300,000 4/1/2021 12/27/2021 21060 Park Rd 22 - South Access Rd (Commodore to Jackfish)3558 210603558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $1,600,000 4/1/2021 2/25/2022 21061 Encantada (Encantada to Nueces County Park)3558 210613558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $650,000 12/1/2021 8/28/2022 21062 Beach Access Rd No. 3 (SH361 to Beach) Design Only 3558 210623558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $400,000 5/1/2021 Design Only 21063 Lipes (Sunwood to Staples)3558 210633558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $3,100,000 7/15/2021 10/8/2022 21064 Rodd Field (Yorktown to Adler)3558 210643558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $4,800,000 7/1/2021 10/24/2022 21065 Strasbourg (Grenoble to Marseille)3558 210653558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $2,000,000 2/1/2022 12/28/2022 21066 Yorktown (Rodd Field to Oso Creek Bridge) Design Only 3558 210663558EXP Bond 2020 - Prop A $1,900,000 4/1/2021 Design Only 21067 McNorton Park 3296 210673296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21068 Brookhill Park 3296 210683296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21069 Academy Park 3296 210693296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21070 Cupier Park 3296 210703296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21071 Sherwood Park 3296 210713296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21072 Sam Houston Park 3296 210723296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21073 Temple Park 3296 210733296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21074 Windsor Park 3296 210743296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21075 Retta Park 3296 210753296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21076 Douden Park 3296 210763296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21077 Crossgate Park 3296 210773296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21078 Brighton Park 3296 210783296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21079 Brandywine Park 3296 210793296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21080 Capt. Falcon Park 3296 210803296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $250,000 4/1/2021 12/1/2021 21081 Texas State Aquarium-Rescue Center 3296 210813296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $3,000,000 21082 North Beach Restroom & Parking Facilities 3296 210823296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $2,500,000 5/1/2021 9/1/2021 21083 Bill Witt City Park - Pool & Facilities (Design Only)3296 210833296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $1,000,000 6/1/2021 Design Only 21084 West Guth Park 3296 210843296EXP Bond 2020 - Prop B $2,000,000 5/1/2021 3/27/2022 21085 Fire Station No. 3 (Land Acquisition and Design Only)3193 210853193EXP Bond 2020 - Prop C $750,000 8/1/2021 Design Only 21086 Police Training Academy (Design Only)3344 210863344EXP Bond 2020 - Prop C $1,250,000 7/1/2021 Design Only $75,000,000 BOND 2020 City provides leverage funding DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Jeffrey Edmonds, Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Richard Martinez, Director of Public Works richardm5@cctexas.com (361) 826-3419 Heather Hurlbert, Director of Finance heatherh3@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 CAPTION: Resolution authorizing the negotiation and execution of 22 professional services contracts for recommendation for Civil Engineering Services in an amount not-to-exceed $16,340,000 with nine engineering consultants for the Bond 2020 Streets projects, located Citywide, with funding available from the Streets Bond 2020 Fund. SUMMARY: This item is for the approval of the mass selection of design consultants for the Bond 2020 Streets projects. A total of 22 projects were approved by voters. Staff is recommending the selection of the top nine scored firms to receive design contracts. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On November 3, 2020, voters approved the City of Corpus Christi’s Bond 2020 Program for a total of $75 million with 42 projects. The propositions passed on election day include projects for streets, parks, and public safety improvements. Proposition A – Streets projects includes a total of 22 projects with an estimated cost $61 million for street improvements. This proposition allows for the designing, demolishing, constructing, renovating, improving, extending and making permanent street, sidewalk, drainage and any related improvements including underground utilities. The streets projects are located Citywide. The Utilities costs have historically averaged approximately the same value as the surface Bond 2020 Program Mass Selection of Design Consultants Proposition A – Streets Projects AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 improvements. General Obligation bonds are used to fund the surface improvements and the underground improvements are funded with utility revenue bonds. The estimated total construction cost for the Bond 2020 streets projects is, therefore, estimated to be $122 million. This item will grant staff the ability to negotiate and execute professional services contracts with nine design consultants for the 22 Bond 2020 streets projects with a total amount not to exceed amount of $16,340,000. The estimate of $16,340,000 is based on the rough estimate of 10 percent of the estimated project cost and also includes the design only projects. Since there are projects with design only, the overall design budget is higher than the 10 percent value of the total Bond 2020 construction budget. Traditionally, Engineering Services has presented Council with individual design contracts for each project. This has created a large volume of agenda activity and delayed program execution on past Bond programs. Staff is seeking this mass approval of the street design contracts to expedite the execution of the Bond 2020 Program. The subsequent construction contracts for the projects that are being designed will be competitively bid and presented to City Council as individual action items. Some Bond 2020 street projects are anticipated to begin design as early as March 2021. All Bond 2020 street projects should enter the design phase by January 2022. COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION PROCESS: On November 30, 2020, the Contracts and Procurement Department issued a Request for Qualifications for the engineering services with the RFQ Number 3343 for Professional Engineering Services Bond 2020 Streets (Proposition A). The City received a total of 23 Statements of Qualifications. The selection committee consisted of representatives from the City Manager’s Office, Engineering Services, and Public Works. On February 5, 2021, the selection committee conducted interviews for 12 of the firms that were recommended by the evaluation committee. Firms were ranked based on five factors: 1) firm’s experience and qualifications of firm; 2) experience and qualifications of the project manager and key staff; 3) project approach and management plan; 4) respondent capacity; and 5) respondent past performance. The selection committee is recommending award to the following nine design consultants:  Ardurra Group, LLC  Freese and Nichols, Inc.  Halff Associates, Inc.  HDR Engineering, Inc.  Hanson Professional Services, Inc.  Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.  LJA Engineering, Inc.  Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc.  Urban Engineering All of the selected firms are located in Corpus Christi. The consultants were matched with appropriate projects based on the evaluation criteria. Attached is the City’s recommendation of award for each street project. The 22 street projects have a first-choice recommendation and a second-choice recommendation in the event that successful contract negotiations cannot be completed with the first-choice recommendation. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is to present these contracts to Council for individual consideration which will delay execution of the Bond 2020 Program. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact in FY2021 is an amount of $16,340,000 with funding available from the Streets Bond 2020 Fund. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: ST2021 Bond 20 Proposition A (Fund 3558) Mission Elem: Street Pavement Maintenance (051) Project: Mass Selection of Design Consultant (Project: 21045 to 21066) Account: Outside Consults (550950) Amount: $16,340,000.00 The design contracts will be initially funded through the General Obligation Bond proceeds. Journal entries will be made after bids are received to allocate the utility design costs based on the utility improvement costs in the successful bid. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council authorize staff to negotiate and execute 22 professional services contracts for Civil Engineering Services in an amount not-to-exceed $ 16,340,000 with nine engineering consultants for the Bond 2020 Streets projects, located Citywide, with funding available from the Streets Bond 2020 Fund. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Map List of Recommended Consultants & Streets Project List of Streets Projects in Council District AE Contract Template Resolution authorizing the negotiation and execution of 22 professional services contracts for recommendation for Civil Engineering Services in an amount not-to-exceed $ 16,340,000 with nine engineering consultants for the Bond 2020 Streets projects, located Citywide, with funding available from the Streets Bond 2020 Fund. WHEREAS, on November 3, 2020, voters approved Bond 2020 Proposition A , for the City to design, demolish, construct, renovate, improve, reconstruct, restructure and extend streets and thoroughfares and related land and right-of-way, sidewalks, streetscapes, collectors, drainage, landscape, signage and acquire land and right-of-way necessary thereto with priority given to the following street projects: Comanche Street, from Carancahua to Alameda; Frontier Drive, from McKinzie to Rockwood; Hearn Road, from Callicoatte to dead end; Wildcat Drive, from FM 624 to Teague; Trinity River Drive, from FM 624 to Wood River; Brownlee Boulevard, from Staples to Morgan; Alameda Street, from Texan to Chamberlain; Everhart Road, from Staples to McArdle; Airport Road, from Morgan to Horne; Carroll Lane, from Holly to dead end; Flato Road, from Bates to Bear; Everhart Road, from Alameda to Staples; Waldron Road, from SPID to Purdue; Jackfish Avenue, from Aquarius to Park Road 22; Park Road 22, from Compass to Jackfish; Park Road 22 South Access Road, from Commodores to Jackfish; Encantada Avenue, from Encantada to Nueces County Park Road; Beach Access Road, from State Hwy 361 to beach; Lipes Boulevard, from Sun Wood to Staples; Rodd Field Road, from Yorktown to Adler; Strasbourg Drive, from Grenoble to Marseille; Yorktown Boulevard, from Rodd Field to Oso Creek bridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute professional services agreements for the 22 Bond 2020 Proposition A Street Projects for a total not to exceed amount of $16,340,000 with the following firms: Ardurra Group, LLC Freese and Nichols, Inc. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Halff Associates, Inc. Hanson Professional Services, Inc. HDR Engineering, Inc. LJA Engineering, Inc. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. Urban Engineering Section 2. In the event a firm fails to execute the contract for the respective Bond 2020 Proposition A project or fails to perform under an executed contract for the project, the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute a contract for the project(s) with a different firm authorized under Section 1 of this Resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED on the ______ day of _________, 2021: Paulette M. Guajardo _______________________ Roland Barrera _______________________ Gil Hernandez _______________________ Michael Hunter _______________________ Billy Lerma _______________________ John Martinez _______________________ Ben Molina _______________________ Mike Pusley _______________________ Greg Smith _______________________ ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor CORPUS CHRISTI BAYCHANNEL CREEK OSODELCAYO DEL OSO LAGUNA MADREGULF OF MEXICONUECES BAY HOLLY LEOPARD YORKTOWN STAP L E S McARDLE ALA M E D A AYERSAGNESEVERHARTLIPES WALDRONSAN T A F E KOSTORYZWOOLDRIDGE CIMARRONWILLIAMS BALDWIN GOLLIHAR FLOUR BLUFFOCEAN CAIN N A V I G A T I O N BEARGRAHAMAIR L I N E TIGER HEARN C LARKW O D F L A T O PORTLAGUNA SHORESNILESEDWICK UP RIVER TIMONWHITE APWATERMA I N GREENWOODCR 34WEBERVILLAHO CARROLLSACKY T A N A R H EW LUMRIVER HOPKINSB R O W N L E E CR 52 B U S HMORGAN ROSCHERTE N T H FLYNNO S O S C H A P A R R A L JESTER P A LM I R A BROOKE G Y P S YROBERTAQUARIUSHMC B R I D E HARRY TRIPOLILIPANBROADWAY B R O N C O TROJAN M O L I N A COLEPURDUELOU ZAHN M A N N I N G COLUMBIABLEVINS H E I N S O H N AARONP O S T ALPINEMARIEVESTALCEDAR PASS B A Y A I R P O R T SARITAB O C K H O L T NAPLESMARY RAMFIELD CAOMPTON BISON BRATTON SHEAN I N E T E E N T H WINDWARDHUNKENTNER SLOUGHENNIS JOSLINPINSO N ELKCENTE RAOTHLIAONTICDONAMC KINZIE CALALLFLORALR O B B Y DON PATRICIO MATLOCKPHARAOH NORTH OSOETIENNESHELY C L I F F M A U S AINES SHAR P S B U R G SEA PI TH I R D ALLEYS U N T I D E RED RIVER BEAL E L V I R A LOIRECR 73 RHINEBROCK LEXINGTONEIDER SANDRA NEMEC GIANTSPATTONEMORYPATTIM C G L O I N PAUL JONESVEGA P O DAY STARRYD E N V E R KASPERHARTDEBRANELSONGRAFORDMEGALANN MAXIMUS KAY SPOHNOLD ROBSTMC C A I N SAVAGE REALESDANTEMARTIN HELDR H UM B A SIMON BARNARDC A T H E A D ORIOLESALSASTON E W A L L T A L B E R TSKYLINE MARS HILLIRISIBISPERSIMMON RANGERSEGREST SUNTAN S P A N I S H BARKDALYSYDNEY MALLARD MT VERNON J U N I O R B E C K CORSICA GEMINI DODYANTELOPE CLINESWEET BAYRI AY HERRINGCANTERKALERHELENLI L Y LANSDOWNBEACH ROSSISARAHEKINGCHIPPEWA RA P I D S VINEYARDPERRYODEMNIMITZ LEE LEONARDA L M A T I O N CAYOPOTHPRESCOTTREIDPARKUP RIVER BEARBISONYORKTOWN SO UP RIVER OCEANOHIOOCEAN UP RIVER LIPANOCEAN ¬« ¬« ¬« ¬« ¬« ¬«¬«¬« ¬« Bond 2020 Legend Facility Project Street Project 0 2 4 6 81Miles . 19 ¬« ¬«10 ¬«6 ¬«4 ¬«5 ¬«8 ¬«9 ¬«3 ¬«7 ¬« P¬«R ¬«S¬«O ¬«G¬«N ¬«I ¬«K ¬«Q ¬«M ¬«J¬«C ¬«B ¬«H ¬«F ¬«D ¬«S¬«E ¬«A ¬«12 ¬«13 ¬«16 ¬«11STARLITE ¬«14 ¬«17 ¬«15 ¬«21 15¬«20 ¬«18 DRAFT BOND 2020 STREET LIST DISTRICT ID STREET FROM TO DISTRICT MPC LENGTH W PCI Comments STREET G Comanche Carancahua Alameda 1 C-1 0.41 40 Reconstuction, upgrade/add lighting, updgrade ADA ramps, sidewalk and curb repair. $ 2,500,000 H Frontier Mckinzie Rockwood 1 C-2 0.41 40 Reconstuction, updgrade ADA ramps, sidewalk and curb repair $ 2,500,000 I Hearn Callicoatte Dead End 1 C-1 0.50 49 Reconstruction, Upgrade add lighting, repair sidewalks, curbs, and ramps. Include the culdesacs. $ 2,100,000 J Wildcat FM 624 Teague 1 C-1 0.31 78 Rehabilitation, update two ADA ramps and some minor spot sidewalk repair $ 2,500,000 DISTRICT 1 TOTAL K Trinity River FM 624 Wood River 1 C-1 0.19 38 Reconstruction, Upgrade add lighting, repair sidewalks, curbs, and ramps. $ 2,400,000 $ 12,000,000.00 F Brownlee Staples Morgan 2 C-1 0.73 20 Reconstruction, Upgrade add lighting, repair sidewalks, curbs and ramps. $ 2,700,000 G Alameda Texan Trail Chamberlain 2 A-2 0.70 51 Rehabilitation, minor concrete work, upgrade add lighting, updgrade ADA ramps, sidewalk and curb repair. $ 6,300,000 DISTRICT 2 TOTAL H Everhart Staples Mc Ardle 2 A-1 0.53 31.18165 Reconstruction continue with previous sections. Estimate includes an added 600,000 for Traffic Signal Improvement. $ 4,300,000 $ 13,300,000.00 A Airport Morgan Horne 3 C-1 0.94 19 Rehabilitation, replace guardrails, upgrade lighting, add sidewalk in front of State Living Center $ 4,800,000 B Carroll Holly Dead End 3 C-1 0.33 22 Reconstruction, upgrade/add lighting, repair sidewalks, curbs, and ramps (Include side streets) $ 2,800,000 DISTRICT 3 TOTAL C Flato Bates Bear 3 C-1 0.49 82 Continuation of the Phase I project with Concrete Pavement $ 4,200,000 $ 11,800,000.00 D Everhart Alameda Staples 4 A-1 0.57 35 Reconstruction, upgrade/add lighting, repair sidewalks, curbs and ramps $ 4,300,000 E Waldron SPID Purdue 4 A-2 0.50 78 Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Phase I $ 3,950,000 F Jackfish End of Aquarius Park Road 22 4 C-1 0.35 72 Rehabilitation, upgarde/add lighting, repair some curb, sidewalks, and ramps $ 900,000 G Park Road 22 Compass Park Road 22 4 Park Road 22 median improvements (Create left turn from Compass to Park Road 22) $ 300,000 H Park Road 22 South Access Road Commodore Jackfish 4 Pavement rehabilitation/re-construction, Add/repair sidewalks, and ramps, lighting improvements contigent upon TXDOT approval $ 1,600,000 I Encantada Encantanda Nueces County Park 4 Improve the oprational safety through the reduction of conflict points by eliminating the luft turn movements out of Encantada Avenue and Nueces County Park Road $ 650,000 J Beach Access Road SH 361 Beach 4 0.32 Design and environmental permitting for proposed new access road proposed between Access Road 1 and Access Road 2 $ 400,000 $ 12,100,000.00 F Lipes Sunwood Staples 5 C-1 0.50 12 Reconstruction, upgarde/ add lighting, repair some curb, sidewalks, and ramps. $ 3,100,000 G Rodd Field Yorktown Adler Drive 5 0.63 N/A Extend Rodd Field from Yorktown Blvd. to Adler Drive with two travel lanes (one in each direction) with ditches $ 4,800,000 H Strasbourg Grenoble Marseille 5 C-1 0.28 34 Reconstruction, Upgrade add lighting, repair sidewalks, curbs and ramps. Tie it to Grenoble Dr project. $ 2,000,000 DISTRICT 5 TOTAL I Yorktown Rodd Field Oso Creek Bridge 5 1.70 Complete Road design and construction Plan for Yorktown Boulevard from Rodd Field Road to Oso Creek Bridge $ 1,900,000 $ 11,800,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 61,000,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 3/9/2021 1 of 1 Bond 2020 Street Projects Implementation Schedule 0 No.Council District Project Start End Start End Start End Start End N O V D E C J A N F E B M A R A P R M A Y J U N J U L A U G S E P O C T N O V D E C J A N F E B M A R A P R M A Y J U N J U L A U G S E P O C T N O V D E C J A N F E B M A R A P R M A Y J U N J U L A U G S E P O C T N O V D E C J A N F E B M A R A P R M A Y J U N J U L A U G S E P O C T N O V D E C 1 -Infrastructure Design Manual 11/30/20 02/23/21 03/01/21 03/01/22 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D D D D 2 -Harbor Bridge Park Mitigation 11/30/20 02/23/21 05/01/21 04/01/22 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D D d 3 1 Frontier-McKinzie to Rockwood 11/30/20 02/23/21 03/01/21 10/27/21 10/27/21 01/25/22 01/25/22 09/22/22 P P P P D d D D D D D D b b B c c C c c C C C 4 4 Waldron-SPID to Purdue 11/30/20 02/23/21 03/15/21 01/09/22 01/09/22 04/09/22 04/09/22 02/03/23 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D B B B C C C C C C C C C C C 5 1 Wildcat-FM 624 to Teague 11/30/20 02/23/21 04/01/21 01/26/22 01/26/22 04/26/22 04/26/22 02/20/23 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D b B B c c C C C C C C C C 6 2 Alameda-Texan Trail to Chamberlain 11/30/20 02/23/21 04/15/21 04/10/22 04/10/22 07/09/22 07/09/22 06/28/24 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D D D B b b C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c c c 7 2 Everhart - Staples to McArdle 11/30/20 02/23/21 05/01/21 04/26/22 04/26/22 07/25/22 07/25/22 07/14/24 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D D D B B B C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 8 4 Everhart-Alameda to Staples 11/30/20 02/23/21 05/15/21 05/10/22 05/10/22 08/08/22 08/08/22 07/28/24 p P P P D D D D D D D D D D D D B B B C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 9 3 Carroll - Holly to Dead End 11/30/20 02/23/21 06/01/21 05/27/22 05/27/22 08/25/22 08/25/22 08/20/23 p P P P D D D D D D D D d d d d b b b C C C C c c c c c c c c 10 3 Flato - Bates to Bear 11/30/20 02/23/21 06/15/21 04/11/22 04/11/22 07/10/22 07/10/22 07/05/23 P P P P D D D D D D D D D D B B B C C C C C C C C C C C C C 11 5 Rodd Field - Yorktown to Alder 11/30/20 02/23/21 07/01/21 07/26/22 07/26/22 10/24/22 10/24/22 01/17/24 P P P P D D D D D D D D D d d d D B b B C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 12 5 Lipes - Sunwood to Staples 11/30/20 02/23/21 07/15/21 07/10/22 07/10/22 10/08/22 10/08/22 10/03/23 P P P P D D D D D D D D D d d d B B B C C C C C C C C C C C C C 13 1 Hearn-Callicoatte to Dead End 11/30/20 02/23/21 08/01/21 03/29/22 03/29/22 06/27/22 06/27/22 04/23/23 p p p p d d d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c c c c c 14 1 Comanche-Carancahua to Alameda 11/30/20 02/23/21 08/15/21 06/11/22 06/11/22 09/09/22 09/09/22 07/06/23 P P P P D d d d d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c c c c c c 15 1 Trinity River-FM 624 to Wood River 11/30/20 02/23/21 07/01/21 02/26/22 02/26/22 05/27/22 05/27/22 01/22/23 P P P P d d d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c c c 16 2 Brownlee-Staples to Morgan 11/30/20 02/23/21 09/15/21 09/10/22 09/10/22 12/09/22 12/09/22 03/03/24 P P P P d d d d d d d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c c c c c c c C C C C 17 3 Airport-Morgan to Horne 11/30/20 02/23/21 10/01/21 09/26/22 09/26/22 12/25/22 12/25/22 12/14/24 P P P P d d d d d d d d d d d d b B B c c c c c c c c c c c C C C C C C C C C C C C C 18 4 Jackfish-End of Aquarius to PR22 11/30/20 02/23/21 06/15/21 12/12/21 12/12/21 03/12/22 03/12/22 11/07/22 P P P P d d d d d d d b b b c c c c C C C C 19 4 PR22-Compass to PR22 11/30/20 02/23/21 04/01/21 09/28/21 09/28/21 12/27/21 12/27/21 06/25/22 P P P P d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c 20 4 PR22 Sth Access Rd- Commodore to Jackfish11/30/20 02/23/21 04/01/21 11/27/21 11/27/21 02/25/22 02/25/22 09/13/22 P P P P d d d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c c 21 4 Encantada to Nueces County Park 11/30/20 02/23/21 12/01/21 05/30/22 05/30/22 08/28/22 08/28/22 04/25/23 P P P P d d d D D D b b b c c c c C C C C 22 4 Beach Access Road-SH 361 to Beach 11/30/20 02/23/21 05/01/21 04/26/22 P P P P d d d d d d d d d d d d 23 5 Strasourg-Grenoble to Marseille 11/30/20 02/23/21 02/01/22 09/29/22 09/29/22 12/28/22 12/28/22 08/25/23 P P P P D d d d d d d d b b b c c c c c c c c c 24 5 Yorktown-Rodd Field to Oso Creek Bridge11/30/20 02/23/21 03/01/21 02/24/22 P P P P d d d d d d d d d d d d 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 DESIGN BID/AWARD CONSTRUCTION Design PROCUREMENT Construction RFQ NO. 3343 Bond 2020 Streets Total Scores Rank Firm Names TECHNICAL SCORE INTERVIEW SCORE TOTAL SCORE 1 Freese and Nichols 47.00 48.00 95 2 LJA Engineering 45.00 46.00 91 3 Hanson Professional Services 46.00 44.00 90 4 HDR Engineering Inc.45.00 43.00 88 5 Halff Associates 44.00 40.00 84 6 LNV, LLC. (Ardurra Group, Inc.)44.00 40.00 84 7 Urban Engineering 42.00 42.00 84 8 Jacobs Engineering Group 41.00 38.00 79 9 Lockwood Andrews and Newnam 41.00 38.00 79 10 Dannenbaum Engineering 39.00 35.00 74 11 Mott MacDonald 40.00 30.00 70 12 Civil Corp 39.00 30.00 69 Program Project Name District Bond Funds Utilities Funds 1st Choice Recommendation 2nd Choice Recommendation Bond 2020 Frontier (McKinzie to Rockwood) 1 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Hanson HDR Bond 2020 Yorktown (Rodd Field to Oso Creek Bridge) (Design Only)5 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 LJA FNI Bond 2020 Wildcat (FM624 to Teague)1 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Halff Adurra Bond 2020 Alameda (Texan Trail to Chamberlain) 2 $ 6,300,000 $ 6,300,000 HDR Hanson Bond 2020 Park Rd 22 - South Access Rd (Commodore to Jackfish)4 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 FNI LJA Bond 2020 Everhart (Staples to McArdle) 2 $ 4,300,000 $ 4,300,000 FNI LJA Bond 2020 Everhart (Alameda to Staples) 4 $ 4,300,000 $ 4,300,000 FNI LJA Bond 2020 Carroll (Holly to Dead End) 3 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,800,000 Ardurra Halff Bond 2020 Flato (Bates to Bear) 3 $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 FNI LJA Bond 2020 Jackfish (End to Aquarius to Park Rd 22) 4 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 LAN Urban Bond 2020 Rodd Field (Yorktown to Adler) 5 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,800,000 Hanson HDR Bond 2020 Lipes (Sunwood to Staples) 5 $ 3,100,000 $ 3,100,000 Hanson HDR Bond 2020 Trinity River (FM624 to Wood River) 1 $ 2,400,000 $ 2,400,000 Ardurra Urban Bond 2020 Hearn (Callicoatte to Dead End) 1 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 Urban Jacobs Bond 2020 Comanche (Carancahua to Alameda) 1 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Hanson HDR Bond 2020 Brownlee (Staples to Morgan) 2 $ 2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 Urban Halff Bond 2020 Airport (Morgan to Horne) 3 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,800,000 HDR Hanson Bond 2020 Waldron-SPID to Purdue 4 $ 3,950,000 $ 3,950,000 Halff Adurra Bond 2020 PR22-Compass to PR22 4 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Jacobs Urban Bond 2020 Encantada-Encantada to Nueces County Park 4 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 Jacobs Urban Bond 2020 Beach Access Road-SH 361 to Beach (Design Only)4 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 FNI LJA Bond 2020 Strasbourg-Grenoble to Marseille 5 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Urban LAN Total Funds $ 61,000,000 $ 61,000,000 1 Freese and Nichols 5 1 47.00 48.00 95.00 14,800,000$ 14,800,000$ 29,600,000$ 3,680,000$ 2 LJA Engineering 1 5 45.00 46.00 91.00 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 3,800,000$ 3,800,000$ 3 Hanson Professional Services 4 2 46.00 44.00 90.00 12,900,000$ 12,900,000$ 25,800,000$ 2,580,000$ 4 HDR Engineering Inc.2 4 45.00 43.00 88.00 11,100,000$ 11,100,000$ 22,200,000$ 2,220,000$ 5 Halff Associates 2 2 44.00 40.00 84.00 6,450,000$ 6,450,000$ 12,900,000$ 1,290,000$ 6 Ardurra Group, Inc.(LNV, LLC.)2 2 44.00 40.00 84.00 5,200,000$ 5,200,000$ 10,400,000$ 1,040,000$ 7 Urban Engineering 3 4 42.00 42.00 84.00 6,800,000$ 6,800,000$ 13,600,000$ 1,360,000$ 8 Jacobs Engineering Group 2 1 41.00 38.00 79.00 950,000$ 950,000$ 1,900,000$ 190,000$ 9 Lockwood Andrews and Newnam (LAN)1 1 41.00 38.00 79.00 900,000$ 900,000$ 1,800,000$ 180,000$ Totals 22 22 61,000,000$ 61,000,000$ 122,000,000$ 16,340,000$ 1st Choice Bond Project $ Rank Firm Names Technical Scores Interview Scores Total Scores Bond Project $Utilities Project $1st Choice Projects 2nd Choice Projects Total Project $Approximate Design $ Contract for Professional Services Page 1 of 11 Revised February 2020 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. ______ CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PROJECT (No./Name) ____________________________________ The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director) and COMPANY NAME, ADRESS, CITY, COUNTY, STATE, ZIP, (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE NO. TITLE PAGE ARTICLE I – SCOPE OF SERVICES ..............................................................................2 ARTICLE II – QUALITY CONTROL .................................................................................3 ARTICLE III – COMPENSATION .....................................................................................3 ARTICLE IV – TIME AND PERIOD OF SERVICE ...........................................................4 ARTICLE V – OPINIONS OF COST ................................................................................5 ARTICLE VI – INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................5 ARTICLE VII – INDEMNIFICATION .................................................................................5 ARTICLE VIII – TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT .........................................................6 ARTICLE IX – RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT .............................................................7 ARTICLE X – OWNER REMEDIES .................................................................................7 ARTICLE XI – CONSULTANT REMEDIES......................................................................8 ARTICLE XII – CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION ..................................................8 ARTICLE XIII – MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ........................................................ 10 Contract for Professional Services Page 2 of 11 Revised February 2020 ARTICLE I – SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 City and Consultant agree that the services provided are properly described in the Scope of Services, which is incorporated herein and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A. The Scope of Services shall include all associated services required for Consultant to provide such Services, pursuant to this Agreement, and any and all Services that would normally be required by law or common due diligence in accordance with the standard of care defined in Article XIII of this Agreement. The approved Scope of Services defines the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant will perform the Services in accordance with Exhibit A and with Consultant’s response to the Request for Qualifications related to this project, which response is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if set out here in its entirety. 1.2 Consultant shall follow City Codes and Standards effective at the time of the execution of the contract. At review milestones, the Consultant and City will review the progress of the plans to ensure that City Codes and Standards are followed unless specifically and explicitly excluded from doing so in the approved Scope of Services attached as Exhibit A. A request made by either party to deviate from City standards after the contract is executed must be in writing. 1.3 Consultant shall provide labor, equipment and transportation necessary to complete all services agreed to hereunder in a timely manner throughout the term of the Agreement. Persons retained by Consultant to perform work pursuant to this Agreement shall be employees or subconsultants of Consultant. Upon request, Consultant must provide City with a list of all subconsultants that includes the services performed by subconsultant and the % of work performed by subconsultant (in dollars). Changes in Consultant’s proposed team as specified in the SOQ or Scope of Services must be agreed to by the City in writing. 1.4 Consultant shall not begin work on any phase/task authorized under this Agreement until they are briefed on the scope of the Project and are notified in writing to proceed. If the scope of the Project changes, either Consultant or City may request a review of the changes with an appropriate adjustment in compensation. 1.5 Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays) in the format requested by the City with each monthly invoice. 1.6 For design services, Consultant agrees to render the professional services necessary for the advancement of the Project through Final Completion of the Construction Contract. Consultant acknowledges and accepts its responsibilities, as defined and described in City’s General Conditions for Construction Contracts, excerpt attached as Exhibit D. 1.6.1 The Consultant agrees to serve as the City’s Designer as defined in the General Conditions and will consult and advise the City on matters related to the Consultant’s Scope of Services during the performance of the Consultant’s services. 1.6.2 The Consultant agrees to prepare plans, specification, bid and contract documents and to analyze bids and evaluate the documents submitted by bidders. 1.6.3 The Consultant agrees to assist the City in evaluating the qualifications of the prospective contractors, subcontractors and suppliers. 1.7 For projects that require subsurface utility investigation: 1.7.1 The Consultant agrees to prepare and submit to the City prior to the 60% submittal a signed and sealed report identifying all utilities within the project area at the Quality Level specified in Exhibits A and A-1. It is assumed that all utilities will be identified using Quality Level A exploratory excavation unless stated otherwise. Contract for Professional Services Page 3 of 11 Revised February 2020 1.7.2 Utilities that should be identified include but are not limited to utilities owned by the City, local franchises, electric companies, communication companies, private pipeline companies and 3rd party owners/operators. 1.8 For project with potential utility conflicts: 1.8.1 The Consultant agrees to coordinate the verification and resolution of all potential utility conflicts. 1.8.2 The Consultant agrees to prepare and submit a monthly Utility Coordination Matrix to the City. 1.9 The Consultant agrees to complete the Scope of Services in accordance with the approved project schedule and budget as defined in Exhibit A, including completing the work in phases defined therein. ARTICLE II – QUALITY CONTROL 2.1 The Consultant agrees to perform quality assurance-quality control/constructability reviews (QCP Review). The City reserves the right to retain a separate consultant to perform additional QCP services for the City. 2.2 The Consultant will perform QCP Reviews at intervals during the Project to ensure deliverables satisfy applicable industry quality standards and meet the requirements of the Project scope. Based on the findings of the QCP Review, the Consultant must reconcile the Project Scope and the Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC), as needed. 2.3 Final construction documents that do not meet City standards in effect at the time of the execution of this Agreement may be rejected. If final construction documents are found not to be in compliance with this Agreement, Consultant will not be compensated for having to resubmit documents. ARTICLE III – COMPENSATION 3.1 The Compensation for all services (Basic and Additional) included in this Agreement and in the Scope of Services for this Agreement shall not exceed $________. 3.2 The Consultant’s fee will be on a lump sum or time and materials (T&M) basis as detailed in Exhibit A and will be full and total compensation for all services and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. Consultant shall submit a Rate Schedule with their proposal. 3.3 The Consultant agrees to complete the Scope of Services in accordance with the approved project schedule and budget as defined in Exhibit A, including completing the work in phases defined therein. 3.4 The Director of Engineering Services may request the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to this contract. Consultant shall notify the City within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 3.5 Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with the Payment Request as shown in Exhibit B. Each invoice will include the Consultant’s estimate of the proportion of the contracted services completed at the time of billing. For work performed on a T&M Basis, the invoice shall include documentation that shows who worked on the Project, the number of hours that each individual worked, the applicable rates from the Rate Schedule and any reimbursable expenses associated with the work. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to Consultant’s monthly invoices in compliance with the Texas Prompt Payment Act. Contract for Professional Services Page 4 of 11 Revised February 2020 3.6 Principals may only bill at the agreed hourly rate for Principals (as defined in the Rate Schedule) when acting in that capacity. Principals acting in the capacity of staff must bill at applicable staff rates. 3.7 Consultant certifies that title to all services covered by a Payment Request shall pass to City no later than the time of payment. Consultant further certifies that, upon submittal of a Payment Request, all services for which Payment Requests have been previously issued and payments received from City shall, to the best of Consultant’s knowledge, information and belief, be free and clear of liens, claims, security interests or encumbrances in favor of Consultant or other persons or entities making a claim by reason of having provided labor or services relating to this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any liens, claims, security interests or encumbrances filed by anyone claiming by, through or under the items covered by payments made by City to Consultant. 3.8 The final payment due hereunder shall not be paid until all reports, data and documents have been submitted, received, accepted and approved by City. Final billing shall indicate “Final Bill – no additional compensation is due to Consultant.” 3.9 City may withhold compensation to such extent as may be necessary, in City’s opinion, to protect City from damage or loss for which Consultant is responsible, because of: 3.9.1 delays in the performance of Consultant’s work; 3.9.2 failure of Consultant to make payments to subconsultants or vendors for labor, materials or equipment; 3.9.3 damage to City; or 3.9.4 persistent failure by Consultant to carry out the performance of its services in accordance with this Agreement. 3.10 When the above reasons for withholding are removed or remedied by Consultant, compensation of the amount withheld shall be made within 30 days. City shall not be deemed in default by reason of withholding compensation as provided under this Agreement. 3.11 In the event of any dispute(s) between the Parties regarding the amount properly compensable for any phase or as final compensation or regarding any amount that may be withheld by City, Consultant shall be required to make a claim pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and follow the procedures provided herein for the resolution of such dispute. In the event Consultant does not initiate and follow the claims procedures as required by the terms of this Agreement, any such claim shall be waived. 3.12 Request of final compensation by Consultant shall constitute a waiver of claims except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant as unsettled at the time of final Payment Request. 3.13 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. The City may direct the Consultant to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. The right to suspend work under this provision does not relieve the City of its obligation to make payments in accordance with section 3.5 above for services provided up to the date of suspension. ARTICLE IV – TIME AND PERIOD OF SERVICE 4.1 This Agreement shall be effective upon the signature of the City Manager or designee (Effective Date). Contract for Professional Services Page 5 of 11 Revised February 2020 4.2 The term of this Agreement will be for a period of six years beginning on the effective date, unless extended by authority of the City Manager or designee. 4.3 The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Contracts and Procurement Department. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 4.4 Time is of the essence for this Agreement. Consultant shall perform and complete its obligations under this Agreement in a prompt and continuous manner so as to not delay the Work for the Project, in accordance with the schedules approved by City. The Consultant and City are aware that many factors may affect the Consultant’s ability to complete the services to be provided under this agreement. The Consultant must notify the City within ten business days of becoming aware of a factor that may affect the Consultant’s ability to complete the services hereunder. 4.5 City shall perform its obligations of review and approval in a prompt and continuous manner so as to not delay the project. 4.6 This Agreement shall remain in force for a period which may reasonably be required for completion of the Project, including any extra work and any required extensions thereto, unless terminated as provided for in this Agreement. For construction design services, “completion of the Project” refers to acceptance by the City of the construction phase of the Project, i.e., Final Completion. ARTICLE V – OPINIONS OF COST 5.1 The Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) is computed by the Consultant and includes the total cost for construction of the Project. 5.2 The OPC does not include the cost of the land, rights-of-way or other costs which are the responsibility of the City. 5.3 Since Consultant has no control over a construction contractor’s cost of labor, materials or equipment, or over the contractor’s methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Consultant’s opinions of probable Project Cost or Construction Cost provided herein are to be made on the basis of Consultant’s experience and qualifications and represent Consultant’s best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry, but Consultant cannot and does not guarantee proposals, bids or the construction cost shall not vary from the OPC prepared by Consultant. ARTICLE VI – INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 Consultant must not commence work under this Agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 6.2 Insurance Requirements are shown in EXHIBIT C. ARTICLE VII – INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, excluding the engineer or architect or that person’s agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control (“Indemnitee”) from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the Contract for Professional Services Page 6 of 11 Revised February 2020 extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City’s reasonable attorney’s fees in proportion to the Consultant’s liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant’s activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII – TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 8.1 By Consultant: 8.1.1 The City reserves the right to suspend this Agreement at the end of any phase for the convenience of the City by issuing a written and signed Notice of Suspension. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement for convenience in the event such suspension extends for a period beyond 120 calendar days by delivering a Notice of Termination to the City. 8.1.2 The Consultant must follow the Termination Procedure outlined in this Agreement. 8.2 By City: 8.2.1 The City may terminate this agreement for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. 8.2.2 The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. If the Consultant again fails to perform under this agreement, the City may terminate the agreement for cause upon seven days written notice to the Consultant with no additional cure period. If the City terminates for cause, the City may reject any and all proposals submitted by Consultant for up to two years. 8.3 Termination Procedure 8.3.1 Upon receipt of a Notice of Termination and prior to the effective date of termination, unless the notice otherwise directs or Consultant takes action to cure a failure to perform under the cure period, Consultant shall immediately begin the phase-out and discontinuance of all services in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Within 30 calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Termination, unless Consultant has successfully cured a failure to perform, Consultant shall submit a statement showing in detail the services performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. City retains the option to grant an extension to the time period for submittal of such statement. Contract for Professional Services Page 7 of 11 Revised February 2020 8.3.2 Consultant shall submit all completed and/or partially completed work under this Agreement, including but not limited to specifications, designs, plans and exhibits. 8.3.3 Upon receipt of documents described in the Termination Procedure and absent any reason why City may be compelled to withhold fees, Consultant will be compensated for its services based upon a Time & Materials calculation or Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. There will be no compensation for anticipated profits on services not completed. 8.3.4 Consultant acknowledges that City is a public entity and has a duty to document the expenditure of public funds. The failure of Consultant to comply with the submittal of the statement and documents, as required above, shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any and all rights or claims to payment for services performed under this Agreement. ARTICLE IX – RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT 9.1 Consultant grants City, or its designees, the right to audit, examine or inspect, at City’s election, all of Consultant’s records relating to the performance of the Work under this Agreement, during the term of this Agreement and retention period herein. The audit, examination or inspection may be performed by a City designee, which may include its internal auditors or an outside representative engaged by City. Consultant agrees to retain its records for a minimum of four years following termination of the Agreement, unless there is an ongoing dispute under this Agreement, then such retention period shall extend until final resolution of the dispute. 9.2 Consultant’s records include any and all information, materials and data of every kind and character generated as a result of and relevant to the Work under this Agreement (Consultant’s Records). Examples include billings, books, general ledger, cost ledgers, invoices, production sheets, documents, correspondence, meeting notes, subscriptions, agreements, purchase orders, leases, contracts, commitments, arrangements, notes, daily diaries, reports, drawings, receipts, vouchers, memoranda, time sheets, payroll records, policies, procedures, and any and all other agreements, sources of information and matters that may, in City’s and Consultant’s reasonable judgment, have any bearing on or pertain to any matters, rights, duties or obligations under or covered by any Agreement Documents. 9.3 City agrees that it shall exercise the right to audit, examine or inspect Consultant’s Records only during Consultant’s regular business hours. Consultant agrees to allow City’s designee access to all of Consultant’s Records, Consultant’s facilities and Consultant’s current employees, deemed necessary by City or its designee(s), to perform such audit, inspection or examination. Consultant also agrees to provide adequate and appropriate work space necessary to City or its designees to conduct such audits, inspections or examinations. 9.4 Consultant shall include this audit clause in any subcontractor, supplier or vendor contract. ARTICLE X – OWNER REMEDIES 10.1 The City and Consultant agree that in the event the City suffers actual damages, the City may elect to pursue its actual damages and any other remedy allowed by law. This includes but is not limited to: 10.1.1 Failure of the Consultant to make adequate progress and endanger timely and successful completion of the Project, which includes failure of subconsultants to meet contractual obligations; 10.1.2 Failure of the Consultant to design in compliance with the laws of the City, State and/or federal governments, such that subsequent compliance costs exceed expenditures that would have been involved had services been properly executed by the Consultant. Contract for Professional Services Page 8 of 11 Revised February 2020 10.1.3 Losses are incurred because of errors and/or omissions in the design, working drawings, specifications or other documents prepared by the Consultant to the extent that the financial losses are greater than the City would have originally paid had there not been errors and/or omissions in the documents. 10.2 When the City incurs non-value added work costs for change orders due to design errors and/or omissions, the City will send the Consultant a letter that includes: (1) Summary of facts with supporting documentation; (2) Instructions for Consultant to revise design documents, if appropriate, at Consultant’s expense; (3) Calculation of non-value added work costs incurred by the City; and (4) Deadline for Consultant’s response. 10.3 The Consultant may be required to revise bid documents and re-advertise the Project at the Consultant’s sole cost if, in the City’s judgment, the Consultant generates excessive addenda, either in terms of the nature of the revision or the actual number of changes due to the Consultant’s errors or omissions. 10.4 The City may withhold or nullify the whole or part of any payment as detailed in Article III. ARTICLE XI – CONSULTANT REMEDIES 11.1 If Consultant is delayed due to uncontrollable circumstances, such as strikes, riots, acts of God, national emergency, acts of the public enemy, governmental restrictions, laws or regulations or any other causes beyond Consultant’s and City’s reasonable control, an extension of the Project schedule in an amount equal to the time lost due to such delay shall be Consultant’s sole and exclusive remedy. The revised schedule should be approved in writing with a documented reason for granting the extension. 11.2 The City agrees that the Consultant is not responsible for damages arising from any cause beyond Consultant’s reasonable control. 11.3 If Consultant requests a remedy for a condition not specified above, Consultant must file a Claim as provided in this Agreement. ARTICLE XII – CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 12.1 Filing of Claims 12.1.1 Claims arising from the circumstances identified in this Agreement or other occurrences or events, shall be made by Written Notice delivered by the party making the Claim to the other party within 21 calendar days after the start of the occurrence or event giving rise to the Claim and stating the general nature of the Claim. 12.1.2 Every Claim of Consultant, whether for additional compensation, additional time or other relief, shall be signed and sworn to by a person authorized to bind the Consultant by his/her signature, verifying the truth and accuracy of the Claim. 12.1.3 The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the Claim. 12.1.4 Within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice and supporting documentation, City will meet to discuss the request, after which an offer of settlement or a notification of no settlement offer will be sent to Consultant. If Consultant is not satisfied with the proposal presented, Consultant will have 30 calendar days in which to (i) submit additional supporting data requested by the City, (ii) modify the initial request for Contract for Professional Services Page 9 of 11 Revised February 2020 remedy or (iii) request Mediation. 12.1.5 Pending final resolution of a claim, except as otherwise agreed in writing, Consultant shall proceed diligently with performance of the Agreement, and City shall continue to make payments in accordance with this Agreement. 12.2 Mediation 12.2.1 All negotiations pursuant to this clause are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. 12.2.2 Before invoking mediation, the Parties agree that they shall first try to resolve any dispute arising out of or related to this Agreement through discussions directly between those senior management representatives within their respective organizations who have overall managerial responsibility for similar projects. This step shall be a condition precedent to the use of mediation. If the parties’ senior management representatives cannot resolve the dispute within 30 calendar days after a Party delivers a written notice of such dispute, then the Parties shall proceed with the mediation process contained herein. 12.2.2.1 In the event that City or Consultant shall contend that the other has committed a material breach of this Agreement, the Party alleging such breach shall, as a condition precedent to filing any lawsuit, request mediation of the dispute. 12.2.2.2 Request for mediation shall be in writing, and shall request that the mediation commence no less than 30 or more than 90 calendar days following the date of the request, except upon agreement of both parties. 12.2.2.3 In the event City and Consultant are unable to agree to a date for the mediation or to the identity of the mediator or mediators within 30 calendar days of the request for mediation, all conditions precedent in this Article shall be deemed to have occurred. 12.2.2.4 The parties shall share the mediator’s fee. Venue for mediation shall be Nueces County, Texas. Any agreement reached in mediation shall be enforceable as a settlement agreement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall waive any immunity or defense. No provision of this Agreement is a consent to suit. 12.3 In calculating the amount of any Claim or any measure of damages for breach of contract, the following standards shall apply both to claims by Consultant and to claims by City: 12.3.1 In no event shall either Party be liable, whether in contract or tort or otherwise, to the other Party for loss of profits, delay damages or for any special incidental or consequential loss or damage of any nature arising at any time or from any cause whatsoever; 12.3.2 Damages are limited to extra costs specifically shown to have been directly caused by a proven wrong for which the other Party is claimed to be responsible. 12.4 In case of litigation between the parties, Consultant and City agree that neither party shall be responsible for payment of attorney’s fees pursuant to any law or other provision for payment of attorneys’ fees. Both Parties expressly waive any claim to attorney’s fees should litigation result from any dispute between the parties to this Agreement. 12.5 In case of litigation between the parties, Consultant and City agree that they have knowingly waived and do hereby waive the right to trial by jury and have instead agreed, in the event of any litigation arising out of or Contract for Professional Services Page 10 of 11 Revised February 2020 connected to this Agreement, to proceed with a trial before the court, unless both parties subsequently agree otherwise in writing. 12.6 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity. This Agreement is to perform a governmental function solely for the public benefit. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to waive City’s governmental immunity from lawsuit, which immunity is expressly retained to the extent it is not clearly and unambiguously waived by state law. ARTICLE XIII – MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 13.1 Assignability. Neither party will assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties under this Agreement contract to any other person and/or party without the prior written consent of the other party, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. This includes subcontracts entered into for services under this Agreement. If the Consultant is a partnership or joint venture, then in the event of the termination of the partnership or joint venture, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 13.2 Provisions Required by Law. Each applicable provision and clause required by law to be inserted into the Agreement shall be deemed to be enacted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though each were physically included herein. 13.3 Standard of Care. Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent licensed professionals practicing under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 13.4 Licensing. Consultant shall be represented by personnel with appropriate licensure, registration and/or certification(s) at meetings of any official nature concerning the Project, including scope meetings, review meetings, pre-bid meetings and preconstruction meetings. 13.5 Independent Contractor. The relationship between the City and Consultant under this Agreement shall be that of independent contractor. City may explain to Consultant the City’s goals and objectives in regard to the services to be performed by Consultant, but the City shall not direct Consultant on how or in what manner these goals and objectives are to be met. 13.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. 13.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement can be construed to create rights in any entity other than the City and Consultant. Neither the City nor Consultant intends to create third party beneficiaries by entering into this Agreement. 13.8 Disclosure of Interest. Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form. Contract for Professional Services Page 11 of 11 Revised February 2020 13.9 Certificate of Interested Parties. For contracts greater than $50,000, Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement. Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf_info_form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html. 13.10 Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees, in compliance with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code, to complete and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary’s Office. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary’s website at http://www.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. 13.11 Title VI Assurance. The Consultant shall prohibit discrimination in employment based upon race, color, religion, national origin, gender, disability or age. 13.12 Controlling Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. Cases must be filed and tried in Nueces County and cannot be removed from Nueces County. 13.13 Severability. If, for any reason, any one or more Articles and/or paragraphs of this Agreement are held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining Articles and/or paragraphs of this Agreement but shall be confined in its effect to the specific Article, sentences, clauses or parts of this Agreement held invalid or unenforceable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any Article, sentence, clause or parts of this Agreement, in any one or more instance, shall not affect or prejudice in any way the validity of this Agreement in any other instance. 13.14 Conflict Resolution Between Documents. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant-prepared Exhibit A, Consultant’s Scope of Services, the Consultant’s response to the Request for Qualifications related to this project, or in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with Articles I-XIII of this Agreement (Articles), the Articles shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. ____________________________________ _____________________________________ Michael Rodriguez Date Consultant Date Chief of Staff Title 1234 Main Street Corpus Christi, TX 78414 (361) 123-4567 Office Email APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ____________________________________ Assistant City Attorney Date ATTEST ____________________________________ City Secretary Date Exhibit A & A-1 Page 1 of 1 Consultant Proposal EXHIBIT A Scope of Services AND EXHIBIT A-1 Task List Sample form for: Payment Request AE Contract Revised 02/01/17 COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. XXXX Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date 01/01/2017 Total Current Previous Total Remaining Percent Basic Services:Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoice Invoice Invoice Balance Complete Preliminary Phase $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 100.0% Design Phase $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 50.0% Bid Phase $500.00 $0.00 $250.00 $750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $750.00 0.0% Construction Phase $2,500.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 0.0% Subtotal Basic Services $6,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $8,250.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,750.00 30.3% Additional Services: Permitting $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 25.0% Warranty Phase $0.00 $1,120.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 0.0% Inspection $0.00 $0.00 $1,627.00 $1,627.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,627.00 0.0% Platting Survey TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD O & M Manuals TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD SCADA TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Subtotal Additional Services $2,000.00 $1,120.00 $1,627.00 $4,747.00 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00 $4,247.00 10.5% Summary of Fees: Basic Services Fees $6,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $8,250.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,750.00 30.3% Additional Services Fees $2,000.00 $1,120.00 $1,627.00 $4,747.00 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00 $4,247.00 10.5% Total of Fees $8,000.00 $2,120.00 $2,877.00 $12,997.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $9,997.00 23.1% Notes: A PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER MUST BE INCLUDED ON ALL INVOICES AND INVOICE CORRESPONDENCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DELAYED PAYMENT OF INVOICES. If needed, update this sample form based on the contract requirements. If applicable, refer to the contract for information on what to include with time and materials (T&M).Exhibit BPage 1 of 1 1 Rev 01/20 EXHIBIT C Insurance Requirements Pre-Design, Design and General Consulting Contracts 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. A waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30-written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have 3-year reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, with the exception of professional liability, which may be on a per claims made basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 2 Rev 01/20 1.5 Consultant is required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation or non-renewal of coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non-renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services Table of Contents Page Article 1 – Definitions and Terminology ....................................................................................................... 2 Article 2 – Preliminary Matters ..................................................................................................................... 8 Article 3 – Contract Documents: Intent, Requirements, Reuse ................................................................... 8 Article 4 – Commencement and Progress of the Work ................................................................................ 9 Article 5 – Availability of Lands; Subsurface, Physical and Hazardous Environmental Conditions .............. 9 Article 6 – Bonds and Insurance ................................................................................................................. 10 Article 7 – Contractor’s Responsibilities ..................................................................................................... 10 Article 8 – Other Work at the Site ............................................................................................................... 10 Article 9 – Owner’s and OPT’s Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 10 Article 10 – OAR’s and Designer’s Status During Construction .................................................................. 11 Article 11 – Amending the Contract Documents; Changes in the Work .................................................... 13 Article 12 – Change Management .............................................................................................................. 13 Article 13 – Claims ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Article 14 – Prevailing Wage Rate Requirements ....................................................................................... 16 Article 15 – Cost of the Work; Allowances; Unit Price Work ...................................................................... 16 Article 16 – Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal, or Acceptance of Defective Work .................... 16 Article 17 – Payments to Contractor; Set-Offs; Completion; Correction Period ........................................ 16 Article 18 – Suspension of Work and Termination ..................................................................................... 16 Article 19 – Project Management ............................................................................................................... 16 Article 20 – Project Coordination ................................................................................................................ 16 Article 21 – Quality Management ............................................................................................................... 17 Article 22 – Final Resolution of Disputes .................................................................................................... 17 Article 23 – Minority/MBE/DBE Participation Policy .................................................................................. 17 Article 24 – Document Management .......................................................................................................... 17 Article 25 – Shop Drawings ......................................................................................................................... 17 Article 26 – Record Data ............................................................................................................................. 20 Article 27 – Construction Progress Schedule .............................................................................................. 21 Article 28 – Video and Photographic documentation ................................................................................ 21 Article 29 – Execution and Closeout ........................................................................................................... 21 Article 30 – Miscellaneous .......................................................................................................................... 22 Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 1 of 22 ARTICLE 1 – DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 1.01 Defined Terms A.Terms with initial capital letters, including the term’s singular and plural forms, have the meanings indicated in this paragraph wherever used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents. In addition to the terms specifically defined, terms with initial capital letters in the Contract Documents may include references to identified articles and paragraphs, and the titles of other documents or forms. 1.Addenda - Documents issued prior to the receipt of Bids which clarify or modify the Bidding Requirements or the proposed Contract Documents. 2.Agreement - The document executed between Owner and Contractor covering the Work. 3.Alternative Dispute Resolution - The process by which a disputed Claim may be settled as an alternative to litigation, if Owner and Contractor cannot reach an agreement between themselves. 4.Application for Payment - The forms used by Contractor to request payments from Owner and the supporting documentation required by the Contract Documents. 5.Award Date – The date the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi (City) authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the Contract on behalf of the City. 6.Bid - The documents submitted by a Bidder to establish the proposed Contract Price and Contract Times and provide other information and certifications as required by the Bidding Requirements. 7.Bidding Documents - The Bidding Requirements, the proposed Contract Documents, and Addenda. 8.Bidder - An individual or entity that submits a Bid to Owner. 9.Bidding Requirements - The Invitation for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Security, Bid Form and attachments, and required certifications. 10.Bid Security - The financial security in the form of a bid bond provided by Bidder at the time the Bid is submitted and held by Owner until the Agreement is executed and the evidence of insurance and Bonds required by the Contract Documents are provided. A cashier’s check, certified check, money order or bank draft from any State or National Bank will also be acceptable. 11.Bonds - Performance Bond, Payment Bond, Maintenance Bond, and other Surety instruments executed by Surety. When in singular form, refers to individual instrument. 12.Change Order - A document issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract and signed by Owner and Contractor which modifies the Work, Contract Price, Contract Times, or terms and conditions of the Contract. 13.Change Proposal - A document submitted by Contractor in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents: a.Requesting an adjustment in Contract Price or Contract Times; Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 2 of 22 b. Contesting an initial decision concerning the requirements of the Contract Documents or the acceptability of Work under the Contract Documents; c. Challenging a set-off against payment due; or d. Seeking a Modification with respect to the terms of the Contract. 14. City Engineer - The Corpus Christi City Engineer and/or his designated representative as identified at the preconstruction conference or in the Notice to Proceed. 15. Claim - A demand or assertion by Owner or Contractor submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. A demand for money or services by an entity other than the Owner or Contractor is not a Claim. 16. Constituent of Concern - Asbestos, petroleum, radioactive materials, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hazardous wastes, and substances, products, wastes, or other materials that are or become listed, regulated, or addressed pursuant to: a. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§9601 et seq. (“CERCLA”); b. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. §§5101 et seq.; c. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§6901 et seq. (“RCRA”); d. The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§2601 et seq.; e. The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251 et seq.; f. The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.; or g. Any other Laws or Regulations regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning hazardous, toxic, or dangerous waste, substance, or material. 17. Contract - The entire integrated set of documents concerning the Work and describing the relationship between the Owner and Contractor. 18. Contract Amendment - A document issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract and signed by Owner and Contractor which: a. Authorizes new phases of the Work and establishes the Contract Price, Contract Times, or terms and conditions of the Contract for the new phase of Work; or b. Modifies the terms and conditions of the Contract, but does not make changes in the Work. 19. Contract Documents - Those items designated as Contract Documents in the Agreement. 20. Contract Price - The monetary amount stated in the Agreement and as adjusted by Modifications, and increases or decreases in unit price quantities, if any, that Owner has agreed to pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 21. Contract Times - The number of days or the dates by which Contractor must: a. Achieve specified Milestones; Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 3 of 22 b. Achieve Substantial Completion; and c. Complete the Work. 22. Contractor - The individual or entity with which Owner has contracted for performance of the Work. 23. Contractor’s Team - Contractor and Subcontractors, Suppliers, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to perform part of the Work or anyone for whose acts they may be liable. 24. Cost of the Work - The sum of costs incurred for the proper performance of the Work as allowed by Article 15. 25. Defective - When applied to Work, refers to Work that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it: a. Does not conform to the Contract Documents; b. Does not meet the requirements of applicable inspections, reference standards, tests, or approvals referred to in the Contract Documents; or c. Has been damaged or stolen prior to OAR’s recommendation of final payment unless responsibility for the protection of the Work has been assumed by Owner at Substantial Completion in accordance with Paragraphs 17.12 or 17.13. 26. Designer - The individuals or entity named as Designer in the Agreement and the subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by Designer to provide design or other technical services to the Owner. Designer has responsibility for engineering or architectural design and technical issues related to the Contract Documents. Designers are Licensed Professional Engineers, Registered Architects or Registered Landscape Architects qualified to practice their profession in the State of Texas. 27. Drawings - The part of the Contract that graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work. Shop Drawings and other Contractor documents are not Drawings. 28. Effective Date of the Contract - The date indicated in the Agreement on which the City Manager or designee has signed the Contract. 29. Field Order - A document issued by OAR or Designer requiring changes in the Work that do not change the Contract Price or the Contract Times. 30. Hazardous Environmental Condition - The presence of Constituents of Concern at the Site in quantities or circumstances that may present a danger to persons or property exposed to Constituents of Concern. The presence of Constituents of Concern at the Site necessary for the execution of the Work or to be incorporated in the Work is not a Hazardous Environmental Condition provided these Constituents of Concern are controlled and contained pursuant to industry practices, Laws and Regulations, and the requirements of the Contract. 31. Indemnified Costs - All costs, losses, damages, and legal or other dispute resolution costs resulting from claims or demands against Owner’s Indemnitees. These costs include fees for engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 4 of 22 32. Laws and Regulations; Laws or Regulations - Applicable laws, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, and orders of governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having jurisdiction over the Project. 33. Liens - Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Contract related funds, real property, or personal property. 34. Milestone - A principal event in the performance of the Work that Contractor is required by Contract to complete by a specified date or within a specified period of time. 35. Modification - Change made to the Contract Documents by one of the following methods: a. Contract Amendment; b. Change Order; c. Field Order; or d. Work Change Directive. 36. Notice of Award - The notice of Owner’s intent to enter into a contract with the Selected Bidder. 37. Notice to Proceed - A notice to Contractor of the Contract Times and the date Work is to begin. 38. Owner - The City of Corpus Christi (City), a Texas home-rule municipal corporation and political subdivision organized under the laws of the State of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized City Manager and his designee, the City Engineer (the Director of Engineering Services), and the City’s officers, employees, agents, or representatives, authorized to administer design and construction of the Project. 39. Owner’s Authorized Representative or OAR - The individual or entity named as OAR in the Agreement and the consultants, subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to provide construction management services to the Owner. The OAR may be an employee of the Owner. 40. Owner’s Indemnitees - Each member of the OPT and their officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors. 41. Owner’s Project Team or OPT - The Owner, Owner’s Authorized Representative, Resident Project Representative, Designer, and the consultants, subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to provide services to the Owner. 42. Partial Occupancy or Use - Use by Owner of a substantially completed part of the Work for the purpose for which it is intended (or a related purpose) prior to Substantial Completion of all the Work. 43. Progress Schedule - A schedule prepared and maintained by Contractor, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising the Contractor’s plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Times. The Progress Schedule must be a Critical Path Method (CPM) Schedule. 44. Project - The total undertaking to be accomplished for Owner under the Contract Documents. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 5 of 22 45. Resident Project Representative or RPR - The authorized representative of OPT assigned to assist OAR at the Site. As used herein, the term Resident Project Representative includes assistants and field staff of the OAR. 46. Samples - Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship representing some portion of the Work that are used to establish the standards for that portion of the Work. 47. Schedule of Documents - A schedule of required documents, prepared, and maintained by Contractor. 48. Schedule of Values - A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, allocating portions of the Contract Price to various portions of the Work and used as the basis for Contractor’s Applications for Payment. 49. Selected Bidder - The Bidder to which Owner intends to award the Contract. 50. Shop Drawings - All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information that are specifically prepared or assembled and submitted by Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. Shop Drawings, whether approved or not, are not Drawings and are not Contract Documents. 51. Site - Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by Owner upon which the Work is to be performed. The Site includes rights-of-way, easements, and other lands furnished by Owner which are designated for use by the Contractor. 52. Specifications - The part of the Contract that describes the requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards, and workmanship as applied to the Work, and certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable to the Work. 53. Subcontractor - An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with other Subcontractors or Suppliers for the performance of a part of the Work. 54. Substantial Completion - The point where the Work or a specified part of the Work is sufficiently complete to be used for its intended purpose in accordance with the Contract Documents. 55. Supplementary Conditions - The part of the Contract that amends or supplements the General Conditions. 56. Supplier - A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having a direct contract with Contractor or with Subcontractors or other Suppliers to furnish materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work. 57. Technical Data - Those items expressly identified as Technical Data in the Supplementary Conditions with respect to either: a. Subsurface conditions at the Site; b. Physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site, except Underground Facilities; or c. Hazardous Environmental Conditions at the Site. 58. Underground Facilities - All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires, manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, other similar facilities or appurtenances, and encasements containing these facilities which are used to convey electricity, gases, Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 6 of 22 steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications, fiber optic transmissions, cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or other control systems. 59. Unit Price Work - Work to be paid for on the basis of unit prices. 60. Work - The construction of the Project or its component parts as required by the Contract Documents. 61. Work Change Directive - A directive issued to Contractor on or after the Effective Date of the Contract ordering an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work. The Work Change Directive serves as a memorandum of understanding regarding the directive until a Change Order can be issued. 1.02 Terminology A. The words and terms discussed in this Paragraph 1.02 are not defined, but when used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning. B. It is understood that the cost for performing Work is included in the Contract Price and no additional compensation is to be paid by Owner unless specifically stated otherwise in the Contract Documents. Expressions including or similar to “at no additional cost to Owner,” “at Contractor’s expense,” or similar words mean that the Contractor is to perform or provide specified operation of Work without an increase in the Contract Price. C. The terms “day” or “calendar day” mean a calendar day of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight. D. The meaning and intent of certain terms or adjectives are described as follows: 1. The terms “as allowed,” “as approved,” “as ordered,” “as directed,” or similar terms in the Contract Documents indicate an exercise of professional judgment by the OPT. 2. Adjectives including or similar to “reasonable,” “suitable,” “acceptable,” “proper,” “satisfactory,” or similar adjectives are used to describe a determination of OPT regarding the Work. 3. Any exercise of professional judgment by the OPT will be made solely to evaluate the Work for general compliance with the Contract Documents unless there is a specific statement in the Contract Documents indicating otherwise. 4. The use of these or similar terms or adjectives does not assign a duty or give OPT authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work, or assign a duty or give authority to the OPT to undertake responsibilities contrary to the provisions of Articles 9 or 10 or other provisions of the Contract Documents. E. The use of the words “furnish,” “install,” “perform,” and “provide” have the following meanings when used in connection with services, materials, or equipment: 1. Furnish means to supply and deliver the specified services, materials, or equipment to the Site or other specified location ready for use or installation. 2. Install means to complete construction or assembly of the specified services, materials, or equipment so they are ready for their intended use. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 7 of 22 3. Perform or provide means to furnish and install specified services, materials, or equipment, complete and ready for their intended use. 4. Perform or provide the specified services, materials, or equipment complete and ready for intended use if the Contract Documents require specific services, materials, or equipment, but do not expressly use the words “furnish,” “install,” “perform,” or “provide.” F. Contract Documents are written in modified brief style: 1. Requirements apply to all Work of the same kind, class, and type even though the word “all” is not stated. 2. Simple imperative sentence structure is used which places a verb as the first word in the sentence. It is understood that the words “furnish,” “install,” “perform,” “provide,” or similar words include the meaning of the phrase “The Contractor shall...” before these words. 3. Unless specifically stated that action is to be taken by the OPT or others, it is understood that the action described is a requirement of the Contractor. G. Words or phrases that have a well-known technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in accordance with this recognized meaning unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents. H. Written documents are required where reference is made to notices, reports, approvals, consents, documents, statements, instructions, opinions or other types of communications required by the Contract Documents. Approval and consent documents must be received by Contractor prior to the action or decision for which approval or consent is given. These may be made in printed or electronic format through the OPT’s project management information system or other electronic media as required by the Contract Documents or approved by the OAR. I. Giving notice as required by the Contract Documents may be by printed or electronic media using a method that requires acknowledgment of the receipt of that notice. ARTICLE 2 – PRELIMINARY MATTERS ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: INTENT, REQUIREMENTS, REUSE 3.01 Intent B. Provide equipment that is functionally complete as described in the Contract Documents. The Drawings and Specifications do not indicate or describe all of the Work required to complete the installation of products purchased by the Owner or Contractor. Additional details required for the correct installation of selected products are to be provided by the Contractor and coordinated with the Designer through the OAR. 3.02 Reference Standards Comply with applicable construction industry standards, whether referenced or not. 1. Standards referenced in the Contract Documents govern over standards not referenced but recognized as applicable in the construction industry. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 8 of 22 2. Comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents if they produce a higher quality of Work than the applicable construction industry standards. 3. Designer determines whether a code or standard is applicable, which of several are applicable, or if the Contract Documents produce a higher quality of Work. 3.03 Reporting and Resolving Discrepancies 3.04 Interpretation of the Contract Documents Submit questions regarding the design of the Project described in the Contract Documents to the OAR immediately after those questions arise. OAR is to request an interpretation of the Contract Documents from the Designer. Designer is to respond to these questions by providing an interpretation of the Contract Documents. OAR will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. C. OPT may initiate a Modification to the Contract Documents through the OAR if a response to the question indicates that a change in the Contract Documents is required. Contractor may appeal Designer’s or OAR’s interpretation by submitting a Change Proposal. ARTICLE 4 – COMMENCEMENT AND PROGRESS OF THE WORK ARTICLE 5 – AVAILABILITY OF LANDS; SUBSURFACE AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONS; HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 5.01 Availability of Lands 5.02 Use of Site and Other Areas 5.03 Subsurface and Physical Conditions 5.04 Differing Subsurface or Physical Conditions OAR is to notify the OPT after receiving notice of a differing subsurface or physical condition from the Contractor. Designer is to: 1. Promptly review the subsurface or physical condition; 2. Determine the necessity of OPT’s obtaining additional exploration or tests with respect the subsurface or physical condition; 3. Determine if the subsurface or physical condition falls within one or more of the differing Site condition categories in Paragraph 5.04.A; 4. Prepare recommendations to OPT regarding the Contractor’s resumption of Work in connection with the subsurface or physical condition in question; 5. Determine the need for changes in the Drawings or Specifications; and 6. Advise OPT of Designer’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. C. OAR is to issue a statement to Contractor regarding the subsurface or physical condition in question and recommend action as appropriate after review of Designer’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 9 of 22 5.05 Underground Facilities The Designer is to take the following action after receiving notice from the OAR: 1. Promptly review the Underground Facility and conclude whether the Underground Facility was not shown or indicated in the Contract Documents, or was not shown or indicated with reasonable accuracy; 2. Prepare recommendations to OPT regarding the Contractor’s resumption of Work in connection with this Underground Facility; 3. Determine the extent to which a change is required in the Drawings or Specifications to document the consequences of the existence or location of the Underground Facility; and 4. Advise OAR of Designer’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations and provide revised Drawings and Specifications if required. D. OAR is to issue a statement to Contractor regarding the Underground Facility in question and recommend action as appropriate after review of Designer’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. ARTICLE 6 – BONDS AND INSURANCE ARTICLE 7 – CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES ARTICLE 8 – OTHER WORK AT THE SITE ARTICLE 9 – OWNER’S AND OPT’S RESPONSIBILITIES 9.01 Communications to Contractor A. OPT issues communications to Contractor through OAR except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. 9.02 Replacement of Owner’s Project Team Members A. Owner may replace members of the OPT at its discretion. 9.03 Furnish Data A. OPT is to furnish the data required of OPT under the Contract Documents. 9.04 Pay When Due 9.05 Lands and Easements; Reports and Tests A. Owner’s duties with respect to providing lands and easements are described in Paragraph 5.01. OPT will make copies of reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions and drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site available to Contractor in accordance with Paragraph 5.03. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 10 of 22 9.06 Insurance 9.07 Modifications 9.08 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals A. OPT’s responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals are described in Paragraph 16.02. 9.09 Limitations on OPT’s Responsibilities A. The OPT does not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, and is not responsible for Contractor’s means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or related safety precautions and programs, or for failure of Contractor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. OPT is not responsible for Contractor’s failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 9.10 Undisclosed Hazardous Environmental Condition A. OPT’s responsibility for undisclosed Hazardous Environmental Conditions is described in Paragraph 5.06. 9.11 Compliance with Safety Program A. Contractor is to inform the OPT of its safety programs and OPT is to comply with the specific applicable requirements of this program. ARTICLE 10 – OAR’S AND DESIGNER’S STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION 10.01 Owner’s Representative A. OAR is Owner’s representative. The duties and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of OAR as Owner’s representative are described in the Contract Documents. 10.02 Visits to Site A. Designer is to make periodic visits to the Site to observe the progress and quality of the Work. Designer is to determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents based on observations made during these visits. Designer is not required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. Designer is to inform the OPT of issues or concerns and OAR is to work with Contractor to address these issues or concerns. Designer’s visits and observations are subject to the limitations on Designer’s authority and responsibility described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. B. OAR is to observe the Work to check the quality and quantity of Work, implement Owner’s quality assurance program, and administer the Contract as Owner’s representative as described in the Contract Documents. OAR’s visits and observations are subject to the limitations on OAR’s authority and responsibility described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 11 of 22 10.03 Resident Project Representatives A. Resident Project Representatives assist OAR in observing the progress and quality of the Work at the Site. The limitations on Resident Project Representatives’ authority and responsibility are described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. 10.04 Rejecting Defective Work A. OPT has the authority to reject Work in accordance with Article 16. OAR is to issue a Defective Work Notice to Contractor and document when Defective Work has been corrected or accepted in accordance with Article 16. 10.05 Shop Drawings, Modifications and Payments A. Designer’s authority related to Shop Drawings and Samples are described in the Contract Documents. B. Designer’s authority related to design calculations and design drawings submitted in response to a delegation of professional design services are described in Paragraph 7.15. C. OAR and Designer’s authority related to Modifications is described in Article 11. D. OAR’s authority related to Applications for Payment is described in Articles 15 and 17. 10.06 Decisions on Requirements of Contract Documents and Acceptability of Work A. OAR is to render decisions regarding non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents and will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. B. Designer is to render decisions regarding the conformance of the Work to the requirements of the Contract Documents. Designer will render a decision to either correct the Defective Work, or accept the Work under the provisions of Paragraph 16.04, if Work does not conform to the Contract Documents. OAR will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. C. OAR will issue a Request for a Change Proposal if a Modification is required. OAR will provide documentation for changes related to the non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents. Designer will provide documentation if design related changes are required. D. Contractor may appeal Designer’s decision by submitting a Change Proposal if Contractor does not agree with the Designer’s decision. 10.07 Limitations on OAR’s and Designer’s Authority and Responsibilities A. OPT is not responsible for the acts or omissions of Contractor’s Team. No actions or failure to act, or decisions made in good faith to exercise or not exercise the authority or responsibility available under the Contract Documents creates a duty in contract, tort, or otherwise of the OPT to the Contractor or members of the Contractor’s Team. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 12 of 22 ARTICLE 11 – AMENDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; CHANGES IN THE WORK ARTICLE 12 – CHANGE MANAGEMENT 12.01 Requests for Change Proposal A. Designer will initiate Modifications by issuing a Request for a Change Proposal (RCP). 1. Designer will prepare a description of proposed Modifications. 2. Designer will issue the Request for a Change Proposal form to Contractor. A number will be assigned to the Request for a Change Proposal when issued. 3. Return a Change Proposal in accordance with Paragraph 12.02 to the Designer for evaluation by the OPT. 12.02 Change Proposals A. Submit a Change Proposal (CP) to the Designer for Contractor initiated changes in the Contract Documents or in response to a Request for Change Proposal. 1. Use the Change Proposal form provided. 2. Assign a number to the Change Proposal when issued. 3. Include with the Change Proposal: a. A complete description of the proposed Modification if Contractor initiated or proposed changes to the OPT’s description of the proposed Modification. b. The reason the Modification is requested, if not in response to a Request for a Change Proposal. c. A detailed breakdown of the cost of the change if the Modification requires a change in Contract Price. The itemized breakdown is to include: 1) List of materials and equipment to be installed; 2) Man hours for labor by classification; 3) Equipment used in construction; 4) Consumable supplies, fuels, and materials; 5) Royalties and patent fees; 6) Bonds and insurance; 7) Overhead and profit; 8) Field office costs; 9) Home office cost; and 10) Other items of cost. d. Provide the level of detail outlined in the paragraph above for each Subcontractor or Supplier actually performing the Work if Work is to be provided by a Subcontractor or Supplier. Indicate appropriate Contractor mark-ups for Work Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 13 of 22 provided through Subcontractors and Suppliers. Provide the level of detail outline in the paragraph above for self-performed Work. e. Submit Change Proposals that comply with Article 15 for Cost of Work. f. Provide a revised schedule. Show the effect of the change on the Project Schedule and the Contract Times. B. Submit a Change Proposal to the Designer to request a Field Order. C. A Change Proposal is required for all substitutions or deviations from the Contract Documents. D. Request changes to products in accordance with Article 25. 12.03 Designer Will Evaluate Request for Modification A. Designer will issue a Modification per Article 11 if the Change Proposal is acceptable to the Owner. Designer will issue a Change Order or Contract Amendment for any changes in Contract Price or Contract Times. 1. Change Orders and Contract Amendments will be sent to the Contractor for execution with a copy to the Owner recommending approval. A Work Change Directive may be issued if Work needs to progress before the Change Order or Contract Amendment can be authorized by the Owner. 2. Work Change Directives, Change Orders, and Contract Amendments can only be approved by the Owner. a. Work performed on the Change Proposal prior to receiving a Work Change Directive or approval of the Change Order or Contract Amendment is performed at the Contractor’s risk. b. No payment will be made for Work on Change Orders or Contract Amendments until approved by the Owner. B. The Contractor may be informed that the Request for a Change Proposal is not approved and construction is to proceed in accordance with the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 13 – CLAIMS 13.01 Claims 13.02 Claims Process A. Claims must be initiated by written notice. Notice must conspicuously state that it is a notice of a Claim in the subject line or first sentence. Notice must also list the date of first occurrence of the claimed event. B. Claims by Contractor must be in writing and delivered to the Owner, Designer and the OAR within 7 days: 1. After the start of the event giving rise to the Claim; or 2. After a final decision on a Change Proposal has been made. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 14 of 22 C. Claims by Contractor that are not received within the time period provided by section 13.02(B) are waived. Owner may choose to deny such Claims without a formal review. Any Claims by Contractor that are not brought within 90 days following the termination of the Contract are waived and shall be automatically deemed denied. D. Claims by Owner must be submitted by written notice to Contractor. E. The responsibility to substantiate a Claim rests with the entity making the Claim. Claims must contain sufficient detail to allow the other party to fully review the Claim. 1. Claims seeking an adjustment of Contract Price must include the Contractor’s job cost report. Provide additional documentation as requested by OAR. 2. Claims seeking an adjustment of Contract Time must include native schedule files in Primavera or MS Project digital format. Provide additional documentation as requested by OAR. F. Contractor must certify that the Claim is made in good faith, that the supporting data is accurate and complete, and that to the best of Contractor’s knowledge and belief, the relief requested accurately reflects the full compensation to which Contractor is entitled. G. Claims by Contractor against Owner and Claims by Owner against Contractor, including those alleging an error or omission by Designer but excluding those arising under Section 7.12, shall be referred initially to Designer for consideration and recommendation to Owner. H. Designer may review a Claim by Contractor within 30 days of receipt of the Claim and take one or more of the following actions: 1. Request additional supporting data from the party who made the Claim; 2. Issue a recommendation; 3. Suggest a compromise; or 4. Advise the parties that Designer is not able to make a recommendation due to insufficient information or a conflict of interest. I. If the Designer does not take any action, the claim shall be deemed denied. J. The Contractor and the Owner shall seek to resolve the Claim through the exchange of information and direct negotiations. If no agreement is reached within 90 days, the Claim shall be deemed denied. The Owner and Contractor may extend the time for resolving the Claim by mutual agreement. Notify OAR of any actions taken on a Claim. K. Owner and Contractor may mutually agree to mediate the underlying dispute at any time after a recommendation is issued by the Designer. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 15 of 22 ARTICLE 14 – PREVAILING WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE 15 – COST OF THE WORK; ALLOWANCES; UNIT PRICE WORK ARTICLE 16 – TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL, OR ACCEPTANCE OF DEFECTIVE WORK ARTICLE 17 – PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTOR; SET-OFFS; COMPLETION; CORRECTION PERIOD ARTICLE 18 – SUSPENSION OF WORK AND TERMINATION ARTICLE 19 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT ARTICLE 20 – PROJECT COORDINATION 20.01 Work Included 20.02 Document Submittal 20.03 Communication During Project A. The OAR is to be the first point of contact for all parties on matters concerning this Project. B. The Designer will coordinate correspondence concerning: 1. Documents, including Applications for Payment. 2. Clarification and interpretation of the Contract Documents. 3. Contract Modifications. 4. Observation of Work and testing. 5. Claims. 20.04 Requests for Information A. Submit Request for Information (RFI) to the Designer to obtain additional information or clarification of the Contract Documents. 1. Submit a separate RFI for each item on the form provided. 2. Attach adequate information to permit a written response without further clarification. Designer will return requests that do not have adequate information to the Contractor for additional information. Contractor is responsible for all delays resulting from multiple document submittals due to inadequate information. 3. A response will be made when adequate information is provided. Response will be made on the RFI form or in attached information. B. Response to an RFI is given to provide additional information, interpretation, or clarification of the requirements of the Contract Documents, and does not modify the Contract Documents. C. Designer will initiate a Request for a Change Proposal (RCP) per Article 12 if the RFI indicates that a Contract Modification is required. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 16 of 22 ARTICLE 21 – QUALITY MANAGEMENT ARTICLE 22 – FINAL RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ARTICLE 23 – MINORITY/MBE/DBE PARTICIPATION POLICY ARTICLE 24 – DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT ARTICLE 25 – SHOP DRAWINGS 25.01 Work Included A. Shop Drawings are required for those products that cannot adequately be described in the Contract Documents to allow fabrication, erection, or installation of the product without additional detailed information from the Supplier. B. Submit Shop Drawings as required by the Contract Documents and as reasonably requested by the OPT to: 1. Record the products incorporated into the Project for the Owner; 2. Provide detailed information for the products proposed for the Project regarding their fabrication, installation, commissioning, and testing; and 3. Allow the Designer to advise the Owner if products proposed for the Project by the Contractor conform, in general, to the design concepts of the Contract Documents. 25.02 Quality Assurance 25.03 Contractor’s Responsibilities 25.04 Shop Drawing Requirements A. Provide adequate information in Shop Drawings and Samples so Designer can: 1. Assist the Owner in selecting colors, textures, or other aesthetic features. 2. Compare the proposed features of the product with the specified features and advise Owner that the product does, in general, conform to the Contract Documents. 3. Compare the performance features of the proposed product with those specified and advise the Owner that the product does, in general, conform to the performance criteria specified in the Contract Documents. 4. Review required certifications, guarantees, warranties, and service agreements for compliance with the Contract Documents. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 17 of 22 25.05 Special Certifications and Reports 25.06 Warranties and Guarantees 25.07 Shop Drawing Submittal Procedures 25.08 Sample and Mockup Submittal Procedures 25.09 Requests for Deviation 25.10 Designer Responsibilities A. Shop Drawings will be received by the Designer. Designer will log the documents and review per this Article for general conformance with the Contract Documents. 1. Designer’s review and approval will be only to determine if the products described in the Shop Drawing or Sample will, after installation or incorporation into the Work, conform to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. 2. Designer’s review and approval will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. 3. Designer’s review and approval of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the item functions. B. Comments will be made on items called to the attention of the Designer for review and comment. Any marks made by the Designer do not constitute a blanket review of the document submittal or relieve the Contractor from responsibility for errors or deviations from the Contract requirements. 1. Designer will respond to Contractor’s markups by either making markups directly in the Shop Drawings file using the color green or by attaching a Document Review Comments form with review comments. 2. Shop Drawings that are reviewed will be returned with one or more of the following status designations: a. Approved: Shop Drawing is found to be acceptable as submitted. b. Approved as Noted: Shop Drawing is Approved so long as corrections or notations made by Designer are incorporated into the Show Drawing. c. Not Approved: Shop Drawing or products described are not acceptable. 3. Shop Drawing will also be designated for one of the following actions: a. Final distribution: Shop Drawing is acceptable without further action and has been filed as a record document. b. Shop Drawing not required: A Shop Drawing was not required by the Contract Documents. Resubmit the document per Article 26. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 18 of 22 c. Cancelled: This action indicates that for some reason, the Shop Drawing is to be removed from consideration and all efforts regarding the processing of that document are to cease. d. Revise and resubmit: Shop Drawing has deviations from the Contract Documents, significant errors, or is inadequate and must be revised and resubmitted for subsequent review. e. Resubmit with corrections made: Shop Drawing is “Approved as Noted,” but has significant markups. Make correction and notations to provide a revised document with markup incorporated into the original document so that no markups are required. f. Returned without review due to excessive deficiencies: Document does not meet the requirement of the Specifications for presentation or content to the point where continuing to review the document would be counterproductive to the review process or clearly does not meet the requirements of the Contract Documents. Revise the Shop Drawing to comply with the requirements of this Section and resubmit. g. Actions a through c will close out the Shop Drawing review process and no further action is required as a Shop Drawing. Actions d through f require follow up action to close out the review process. 4. Drawings with a significant or substantial number of markings by the Contractor may be marked “Approved as Noted” and “Resubmit with corrections made.” These drawings are to be revised to provide a clean record of the Shop Drawing. Proceed with ordering products as the documents are revised. 5. Dimensions or other data that does not appear to conform to the Contract Documents will be marked as “At Variance With” (AVW) the Contract Documents or other information provided. The Contractor is to make revisions as appropriate to comply with the Contract Documents. C. Bring deviations to the Shop Drawings to the attention of the Designer for approval by using the Shop Drawing Deviation Request form. Use a single line for each requested deviation so the Status and Action for each deviation can be determined for that requested deviation. If approval or rejection of a requested deviation will impact other requested deviations, then all related deviations should be included in that requested deviation line so the status and action can be determined on the requested deviation as a whole. D. Requested deviations will be reviewed as possible Modification to the Contract Documents. 1. A Requested deviation will be rejected as “Not Approved” if the requested deviation is unacceptable. Contractor is to revise and resubmit the Shop Drawing with corrections for approval. 2. A Field Order will be issued by the Designer for deviations approved by the Designer if the requested deviation is acceptable and if the requested deviation will not result in a change in Contract Price or Contract Times. Requested deviations from the Contract Documents may only be approved by Field Order. 3. A requested deviation will be rejected if the requested deviation is acceptable but the requested deviation will or should result in a change in Contract Price or Contract Times. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 19 of 22 Submit any requested deviation that requires a change in Contract Price or Contract Times as a Change Proposal for approval prior to resubmitting the Shop Drawing. E. Contractor is to resubmit the Shop Drawing until it is acceptable and marked Approved or Approved as Noted and is assigned an action per Paragraph 25.10.B that indicates that the Shop Drawing process is closed. F. Information that is submitted as a Shop Drawings that should be submitted as Record Data or other type of document, or is not required may be returned without review, or may be deleted. No further action is required and the Shop Drawing process for this document will be closed. ARTICLE 26 – RECORD DATA 26.01 Work Included 26.02 Quality Assurance 26.03 Contractor’s Responsibilities 26.04 Record Data Requirements 26.05 Special Certifications and Reports 26.06 Warranties and Guarantees 26.07 Record Data Submittal Procedures 26.08 Designer’s Responsibilities A. Record Data will be received by the Designer, logged, and provided to Owner as the Project record. 1. Record Data may be reviewed to see that the information provided is adequate for the purpose intended. Record Data not meeting the requirements of Paragraph 26.02 may be rejected as unacceptable. 2. Record Data is not reviewed for compliance with the Contract Documents. Comments may be returned if deviations from the Contract Documents are noted during the cursory review performed to see that the information is adequate. 3. Contractor’s responsibility for full compliance with the Contract Documents is not relieved by the review of Record Data. Contract modifications can only be approved by a Modification. B. Designer may take the following action in processing Record Data: 1. File Record Data as received if the cursory review indicates that the document meets the requirements of Paragraph 26.02. Document will be given the status of “Filed as Received” and no further action is required on that Record Data. 2. Reject the Record Data for one of the following reasons: a. The document submittal requirements of the Contract Documents indicate that the document submitted as Record Data should have been submitted as a Shop Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 20 of 22 Drawing. The Record Data will be marked “Rejected” and “Submit Shop Drawing.” No further action is required on this document as Record Data and the Record Data process will be closed. Resubmit the document as a Shop Drawing per Article 25. b. The cursory review indicates that the document does not meet the requirements of Paragraph 26.02. The Record Data will be marked “Rejected” and “Revise and Resubmit.” Contractor is to resubmit the Record Data until it is acceptable and marked “Filed as Received.” When Record Data is filed, no further action is required and the Record Data process will be closed. c. The Record Data is not required by the Contract Documents nor is the Record Data applicable to the Project. The Record Data will be marked “Rejected” and “Cancel - Not Required.” No further action is required and the Record Data process will be closed. C. Contractor is to resubmit the Record Data until it is acceptable and marked “Filed as Received.” ARTICLE 27 – CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS SCHEDULE ARTICLE 28 – VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION ARTICLE 29 – EXECUTION AND CLOSEOUT 29.01 Substantial Completion A. Notify the Designer that the Work or a designated portion of the Work is substantially complete per the General Conditions. Include a list of the items remaining to be completed or corrected before the Project will be considered to be complete. B. OPT will visit the Site to observe the Work within a reasonable time after notification is received to determine the status of the Project. C. Designer will notify the Contractor that the Work is either substantially complete or that additional Work must be performed before the Project will be considered substantially complete. 1. Designer will notify the Contractor of items that must be completed before the Project will be considered substantially complete. 2. Correct the noted deficiencies in the Work. 3. Notify the Designer when the items of Work in the Designer’s notice have been completed. 4. OPT will revisit the Site and repeat the process. 5. Designer will issue a Certificate of Substantial Completion to the Contractor when the OPT considers the Project to be substantially complete. The Certificate will include a tentative list of items to be corrected before Final Payment will be recommended. 6. Review the list and notify the Designer of any objections to items on the list within 10 days after receiving the Certificate of Substantial Completion. Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 21 of 22 29.02 Final Inspections A. Notify the Designer when: 1. Work has been completed in compliance with the Contract Documents; 2. Equipment and systems have been tested per Contract Documents and are fully operational; 3. Final Operations and Maintenance Manuals have been provided to the Owner and all operator training has been completed; 4. Specified spare parts and special tools have been provided; and 5. Work is complete and ready for final inspection. B. OPT will visit the Site to determine if the Project is complete and ready for Final Payment within a reasonable time after the notice is received. C. Designer will notify the Contractor that the Project is complete or will notify the Contractor that Work is Defective. D. Take immediate steps to correct Defective Work. Notify the Designer when Defective Work has corrected. OPT will visit the Site to determine if the Project is complete and the Work is acceptable. Designer will notify the Contractor that the Project is complete or will notify the Contractor that Work is Defective. E. Submit the Request for Final Payment with the closeout documents described in Paragraph 29.06 if notified that the Project is complete and the Work is acceptable. ARTICLE 30 – MISCELLANEOUS END OF SECTION Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services EXHIBIT D Page 22 of 22 EXHIBIT “E” Page 1 of 2 SUPPLIER NUMBER __________ TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with “NA”. See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 2.Partnership 3.Sole Owner4.Association 5.Other____________________________________ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1.State the names of each “employee” of the City of Corpus Christi having an “ownership interest”constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named “firm.” Name Job Title and City Department (if known)N/A 2.State the names of each “official” of the City of Corpus Christi having an “ownership interest”constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named “firm.” Name TitleN/A 3.State the names of each “board member” of the City of Corpus Christi having an “ownership interest”constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named “firm.” Name Board, Commission or CommitteeN/A 4.State the names of each employee or officer of a “consultant” for the City of Corpus Christi whoworked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an “ownership interest”constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named “firm.” Name ConsultantN/A EXHIBIT “E” Page 2 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: DEFINITIONS a.“Board member.” A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. “Economic benefit”. An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. “Employee.” Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part- time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d.“Firm.” Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e.“Official.” The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f.“Ownership Interest.” Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. “Constructively held” refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements.” g. “Consultant.” Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. Form provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Revised 12/22/2017 FORM 1295CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES OFFICE USE ONLOFFICE USE ONLOFFICE USE ONLOFFICE USE ONLOFFICE USE ONLYYYYY 6 UNSWORN DECLARATION My name is _______________________________________________________, and my date of birth is _______________________________. My address is ________________________________________________, ___________________, _______, __________, ______________. (street) (city) (state) (zip code) (country) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in ___________________ County, State of ______________ , on the _______ day of _______________, 20______. (month) (year) Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity (Declarant) ADD ADDITIONAL PAGES AS NECESSARY Name of Interested Party Nature of Interest (check applicable)City, State, Country (place of business)Controlling Intermediary 4 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. 2 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party.Must file online at www.ethics.state.tx.us/File City Council Presentation March 16, 2021 1 BOND 2020 STREETS PROJECTS BOND 2020 PROGRAM SUMMARY 2 Proposition Number of Projects Total Allocation Streets 22 $61M (81%) Parks 18 $12M (16%) Public Safety 2 $2M (3%) Total 42 $75M PROPOSITION A - STREETS •$61M Allocation –22 Streets in the 5 Council Districts •Focus on Arterials and Collectors –Reconstruction and Rehabilitation –Update lighting, sidewalk & curb repairs, Bike Lanes and ADA ramps •Continuation of previous Bond and Street Preventative Maintenance Program projects 3 CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS •Mass selection and negotiation of 22 contracts. •Benefits include: –Less staff time spent on council items and negotiating •Faster execution •5-6 months time savings –Cost savings in staff time and negotiating –Timely completion of schedule 4 RFQ SCHEDULE 5 Bond 2020 Streets RFQ Schedule Date Activity 11/30/2020 Request for Qualifications Issued 12/7/2020 Pre-Qualifications Conference 12/16/2020 Requests for Clarifications Due 12/23/2020 Responses to Requests for Clarifications Due 12/30/2020 Statement of Qualifications Due 1/22/2021 Review Statement of Qualifications 2/5/2021 Interviews SELECTION COMMITTEE 6 CMO = City Manager’s Office ES = Engineering Services PW = Public Works Technical Review Committee Interview Committee Ratna Pottumuthu, Asst. Director Project Management (ES)Peter Zanoni, City Manager (CMO) Larry Wegner, Engineering Project Manager (ES)Michael Rodriguez, Chief of Staff (CMO) Mai Bernal, Engineering Project Manager (ES) Jeff Edmonds, Director of Engineering Services (ES) Richard Martinez, Director of Public Works (PW) Ratna Pottumuthu, Asst. Director Project Management (ES) Sarah Munoz, Asst. Director Traffic Engineering (PW) Sarah Munoz, Asst. Director Traffic Engineering (PW) REVIEW & EVALUTION CRITERIA •Received 23 Statements of Qualifications •12 Firms Recommended for Interviews •9 Firms Recommended for Award •Evaluation Criteria: 1)Firms’ Experience (15 points) 2)Team Experience (15 points) 3)Understanding of Project Scope (20 points) Total for Technical Proposal = 50 points Total for Interview = 50 points Total = 100 points 7 PROJECT SUMMARY 8 1st Choice Bond Project $ Rank Firm Names Number of Projects 1st Choice Technical Scores Interview Scores Total Scores Bond Project $ Utilities Project $Total Project $Approximate Design $ 1 Freese and Nichols 5 47.00 48.00 95.00 $ 14,800,000 $ 14,800,000 $ 29,600,000 $ 3,680,000 2 LJA Engineering 1 45.00 46.00 91.00 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 3,800,000 3 Hanson Professional Services 4 46.00 44.00 90.00 $ 12,900,000 $ 12,900,000 $ 25,800,000 $ 2,580,000 4 HDR Engineering Inc.2 45.00 43.00 88.00 $ 11,100,000 $ 11,100,000 $ 22,200,000 $ 2,220,000 5 Halff Associates 2 44.00 40.00 84.00 $ 6,450,000 $ 6,450,000 $ 12,900,000 $ 1,290,000 5 Ardurra Group, Inc.(LNV, LLC.)2 44.00 40.00 84.00 $ 5,200,000 $ 5,200,000 $ 10,400,000 $ 1,040,000 5 Urban Engineering 3 42.00 42.00 84.00 $ 6,800,000 $ 6,800,000 $ 13,600,000 $ 1,360,000 8 Jacobs Engineering Group 2 41.00 38.00 79.00 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 190,000 8 Lockwood Andrews and Newnam (LAN)1 41.00 38.00 79.00 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 180,000 Totals 22 $ 61,000,000 $ 61,000,000 $ 122,000,000 $ 16,340,000 STREET AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS 9 Project Name District Bond Funds Utilities Funds Total Funds 1st Choice Recommendation 2nd Choice Recommendation Frontier (McKinzie to Rockwood)1 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 5,000,000 Hanson HDR Wildcat (FM624 to Teague)1 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 5,000,000 Halff Adurra Trinity River (FM624 to Wood River) 1 $ 2,400,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 4,800,000 Ardurra Urban Hearn (Callicoatteto Dead End) 1 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 4,200,000 Urban Jacobs Comanche (Carancahuato Alameda)1 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 5,000,000 Hanson HDR Alameda (Texan Trail to Chamberlain) 2 $ 6,300,000 $ 6,300,000 $ 12,600,000 HDR Hanson Everhart (Staples to McArdle)2 $ 4,300,000 $ 4,300,000 $ 8,600,000 FNI LJA Brownlee (Staples to Morgan) 2 $ 2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 5,400,000 Urban Halff Carroll (Holly to Dead End)3 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 5,600,000 Ardurra Halff Flato (Bates to Bear)3 $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 8,400,000 FNI LJA Airport (Morgan to Horne)3 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 9,600,000 HDR Hanson STREET AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Project Name District Bond Funds Utilities Funds Total Funds 1st Choice Recommendation 2nd Choice Recommendation Park Rd 22 - South Access Rd (Commodore to Jackfish)4 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 3,200,000 FNI LJA Everhart (Alameda to Staples) 4 $ 4,300,000 $ 4,300,000 $ 8,600,000 FNI LJA Jackfish (End to Aquarius to Park Rd 22)4 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 1,800,000 LAN Urban Waldron-SPID to Purdue 4 $ 3,950,000 $ 3,950,000 $ 7,900,000 Halff Adurra PR22-Compass to PR22 4 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 600,000 Jacobs Urban Encantada-Encantada to Nueces County Park 4 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 1,300,000 Jacobs Urban Beach Access Road-SH 361 to Beach (Design Only)4 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 800,000 FNI LJA Yorktown (Rodd Field to Oso Creek Bridge) (Design Only)5 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 3,800,000 LJA FNI Rodd Field (Yorktown to Adler)5 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 9,600,000 Hanson HDR Lipes (Sunwood to Staples) 5 $ 3,100,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 6,200,000 Hanson HDR Strasbourg-Grenoble to Marseille 5 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 Urban LAN 11 Project Name Approx. Street Design Approx. Utilities Design Approx. Total Design 1st Choice Recommendation 2nd Choice Recommendation Frontier (McKinzie to Rockwood)$ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 Hanson HDR Yorktown (Rodd Field to Oso Creek Bridge) (Design Only)$ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 3,800,000 LJA FNI Wildcat (FM624 to Teague)$ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 Halff Adurra Alameda (Texan Trail to Chamberlain) $ 630,000 $ 630,000 $ 1,260,000 HDR Hanson Park Rd 22 - South Access Rd (Commodore to Jackfish)$ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 320,000 FNI LJA Everhart (Staples to McArdle)$ 430,000 $ 430,000 $ 860,000 FNI LJA Everhart (Alameda to Staples) $ 430,000 $ 430,000 $ 860,000 FNI LJA Carroll (Holly to Dead End)$ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 560,000 Ardurra Halff Flato (Bates to Bear)$ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ 840,000 FNI LJA Jackfish (End to Aquarius to Park Rd 22)$ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 180,000 LAN Urban Rodd Field (Yorktown to Adler)$ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 960,000 Hanson HDR Lipes (Sunwood to Staples) $ 310,000 $ 310,000 $ 620,000 Hanson HDR Trinity River (FM624 to Wood River) $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 480,000 Ardurra Urban Hearn (Callicoatte to Dead End) $ 210,000 $ 210,000 $ 420,000 Urban Jacobs Comanche (Carancahua to Alameda)$ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 Hanson HDR Brownlee (Staples to Morgan) $ 270,000 $ 270,000 $ 540,000 Urban Halff Airport (Morgan to Horne)$ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 960,000 HDR Hanson Waldron-SPID to Purdue $ 395,000 $ 395,000 $ 790,000 Halff Adurra PR22-Compass to PR22 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 60,000 Jacobs Urban Encantada-Encantada to Nueces County Park $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 130,000 Jacobs Urban Beach Access Road-SH 361 to Beach (Design Only)$ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 800,000 FNI LJA Strasbourg-Grenoble to Marseille $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 400,000 Urban LAN Total Funds $ 8,170,000 $ 8,170,000 $ 16,340,000 13% AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 DATE: March 16, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Richard Martinez, Director of Public Works richardm5@cctexas.com (361) 826-3419 Heather Hurlbert, Director of Finance heatherh3@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 CAPTION: Motion awarding Amendment Number 1 to Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Corpus Christi, Texas, to provide additional preliminary design services to develop three drainage solution options for North Beach drainage [navigable canal, open channel, and closed conduit], located in Council District 1, in an amount of $123,745.00 for a total amount not to exceed $632,733.00, with FY 2021 funding available from the Storm Water Capital Fund. SUMMARY: This motion awards Amendment No. 1 to Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., (LAN) to provide additional preliminary design services to furnish cost estimates to develop three drainage solution options for North Beach to include a navigable canal, open channel, and closed conduit system. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: North Beach has been a tourist destination for over 100 years. Located on the far north end of Corpus Christi, North Beach provides access to beaches, boat launches, shopping, restaurants, and popular tourist attractions such as the Texas State Aquarium and USS Lexington. North Beach experiences frequent flooding during high tide events. The high tide flooding causes ponding in low-lying areas and impedes drainage from modest rainfall events. The ponding and poor drainage has a negative impact on the area’s economic development. The North Beach Drainage Assessment Report prepared by Urban Engineering has indicated that the construction of a navigable canal could help mitigate the flooding issue. On June 23, 2020, Council authorized Professional Services Amendment 1 North Beach Navigable Canal a Professional Services Agreement with LAN for Phase I of the project. The phase I scope of services was to define the navigable canal’s layout and project limits, determining if the navigable canal would be functional for its intended uses of being navigable and providing drainage relief in North Beach. Additional tasks included traffic impact analysis, water quality analysis, regulatory permit considerations, real estate requirements review and the preparation of a final report. On January 26, 2021, LAN briefed City Council on the results investigating the navigable canal’s scope and project limits. There were several major findings presented. One of the major findings presented by LAN stated that after 85% of the peninsula is raised a minimum of six and a half feet in certain areas, and on average up to two to three feet, the canal could improve drainage for up to a 50-year rainfall event. The canal would not improve drainage from a tidal surge of three and a half feet or greater. The report stated that the canal could make tidal flooding surge worse by having a body of water in the middle of a peninsula. A storm surge from a strong tropical storm or Category 1 hurricane would put 95% of the peninsula under water without having the peninsula elevated with fill. A second significant finding is that the storm sewer system on the eastern part of the peninsula would have to be replaced and re-directed toward the canal rather than the current north and south conveyance in place. Numerical modeling was conducted to evaluate water quality conditions that may occur in the canal under various design layouts. Traffic pattern assessments done as part of the Phase I study reveal that the proposed canal would cut off traffic from east to west across the project entire area. Side streets that typically carried traffic from US181 to key destinations would be cut-off, and traffic would have to be routed to bridged access point(s) depending on the final design of the canal. At the meeting, staff received policy direction from City Council to have LAN develop cost estimates for three drainage solution options for North Beach to include a navigable canal, open channel, and closed conduit system. This item will authorize the contract amendment and budget for those services to be provided by LAN. PROJECT TIMELINE: The preliminary probable cost estimate work is expected to begin in March 2021 with estimated completion in May 2021. COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION PROCESS The Contracts and Procurement Department issued a Request for Qualifications for the engineering services for North Beach Navigable Canal. LAN was the only firm that submitted their qualifications. A technical evaluation was performed by the selection committee. The technical evaluation team consisted of seven team members including staff from the City Manager’s Office, Engineering Department, Nueces County, Texas State Aquarium, and an external Engineer. LAN was recommended as technically qualified to perform the work. This contract amendment is for Phase II services that were contemplated under the original solicitation but not included in the Phase I scope of work. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is not to authorize the amendment which will cause the project to be on hold. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact in FY2021 is an amount of $123,745.00 with funding available from the Storm Water Capital Fund. Specifically, available funding is in the North Beach Navigable Canal Project budget. Currently, the FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) does not have funds budgeted for the additional design work. The CIP will be revised to show the additional design expenditures in an amount of $123,745.00 for FY 2021. FUNDING DETAIL: Fund: Storm Water 2015 (Fund 4530) Mission Elem: Storm Water Drainage (043) Project: North Beach Navigable Canal (Project No. 20277) Account: Outside Consultants (550950) Activity: 20277-4530-EXP Amount: $123,745.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 for the North Beach Navigable Canal project in an amount not to exceed of $123,745.00. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location Maps Contract 37 181 37 181 N CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES NORTH BEACH NAVIGABLE CANAL VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NUMBER: 20277 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION 181 NCITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES NORTH BEACH NAVIGABLE CANAL AERIAL MAP NOT TO SCALEBREAKWATER AVE.BURLESON ST.CORPUS CHRISTI BAY TIMON BLVD.GULDEN ST.PROJECT NUMBER: 20277 PROJECT LOCATION 500 N. Shoreline Blvd. Ste. 500 • Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 • 361.882.2257 • www.lan-inc.com February 12, 2021 Mr. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi PO BOX 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Re: Proposal for North Beach Navigable Canal Project (Phase II) Dear Mr. Edmonds , Based on our conversation on February 4th, attached is our proposal for completing Phase II of the North Beach Navigable Canal project. Phase II will be an 8-week process consisting of LAN providing opinions of probable project costs for three options for North Beach. As discussed, Option 1 are improvements to the existing closed conduit /underground system, Option 2 is a new open channel, linear park and greenway, Option 3 (A&B) are the two alternatives for a navigable canal presented in the LAN ’s Phase I report. Since LAN has not investigated two of the three options in enough detail, some level of effor t would be required to review pas t studies and develop refined layouts for each. Additionally, for LAN to determine in sufficient detail the costs for utility relocations, we have included a small level of effort to investigate existing utilities and catalog and map t hem for future consideration. Additional details and project assumptions can be found in Attachment A. We propose to complete these services on a lump sum basis for total contract amount of $123,745.00. Please feel free to contact me at 361-792-7225 or by email at SMHarris @lan-inc.com, if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Scott M Harris , PE Associate, Regional Manager Attachments: A – Scope of Services and Summary of Fees Sincerely, Scott M. Harris , PE Associate, Regional Manager Sincerely, Scott M. Harris , PE Associate, Regional Manager 1 Attachment A Scope of Services and Summary of Fees Overview In December 2019, the City of Corpus Christi City Council passed an ordinance (# 031970) authorizing a $41 Million dollar project on North Beach in Corpus Christi, Texas to design and construct a navigable canal. LAN recently completed Phase I of this project which advanced the concepts previously developed by the City and finalized the navigable canal’s scope and project limits. Phase I’s ultimate objective was to investigate the project for its intended use of being navigable and a improve drainage for the North Beach area. On January 26th, 2021, LAN briefed City Council on the results of the Phase I analysis and it was concluded that three options would be further investigated for cost. On February 4th, LAN met with the City Manager to discuss three options that LAN would provide cost estimates for and receive direction from staff on how to proceed. The following options were approved: Option 1 – Closed Conduit / Underground System Option 2 – Open Channel / Linear Park Option 3 – Navigable Canal (2 Alternatives) Alternative A – Canal Exit to North Alternative B – Canal Exit through Beach Project Descriptions: Option 1 – Closed Conduit / Underground System This project does not provide for a new open ditch or navigable canal at North Beach. It provides for short term improvements to the existing drainage systems . The improvements align with those recommendations made by HDR in their 2018 Feasibility Study. Specifically, they call for a new reinforced box culvert system in Surfside Boulevard, a new Outfall into Corpus Christi Bay at Breakwater Avenue, installation of cross drainage culverts at intersections and driveways where necessary, and grading and cons truction of roadside ditches including a new open ditch near Dolphin Park. Private properties would not be raised to achieve positive drainage. See Exhibit 1 and additional assumptions below. Option 2 – Open Channel / Linear Park This project would provide for a new open drainage channel at North Beach that would include a greenway or linear park along each side of the channel. The channel would not be navigable to boats but would provide for improved drainage against rainfalls and higher than normal tides. This project generally aligns with recommendations made by Urban Engineering in 2019 but adds several features that would 2 make it a destination for tourists / visitors. The channel will be a concrete lined trapezoidal channel, approximately 20-feet wide at the bottom and 60 to 80-feet wide at the top (bank to bank). Pedestrian facilities , shared use paths, and park amenities would line the channel. The channel would outfall to Corpus Christi Bay near Dolphin Park and the Jetties , would integrate the existing wetlands , and include a culvert on the south end of the project for circulation to the Bay. Streets would be raised along the channel and in areas appropriate for construction of the system and to achieve positive drainage. In addition to rights-of-way, this project would require raising of private properties to achieve positive drainage into the proposed open channel. See Exhibit 2 and additional assumptions below. Option 3 – Navigable Canals This project would provide for a new navigable canal at North Beach, as evaluated for technical feasibility in LAN’s Phase I Project Report. Two alternatives will be estimated: Alternative A – Outfall at North Jetties - This Alternative provides for a rectangular channel with a structural bulkhead approximately 8,000 linear feet long. The canal would be 65 to 100 -feet wide (max) and 10-feet deep. Alternative A would outfall adjacent to the north jetties and include a box culvert at Breakwater Avenue for circulation. See Exhibit 3A and additional assumptions below. Alternative B – Outfall thru Beach – This alternative provides for a rectangular canal with a structural bulkhead approximately 5,600 linear feet long. The canal would be 65 to 90-feet wide (max) and 10-feet deep. Alternative B would outfall through the beach adjacent to Burleson, include a box culvert outfall to the wetlands and a box culvert outfall at Breakwater Avenue for circulation. See Exhibit 3B and additional assumptions below. Project Assumptions: In addition to the project descriptions above, for the purposes of providing opinions of probable cost for each of the project s , LAN will make the following assumptions: 1. Recommendations for all options will be based on the same design criteria, storms, and provide the same benefit, using City of Corpus Christi Drainage Criteria Manual (DCM). 2. Options 2 and 3 will require to be constructed in two phases: Phase I – North of Burleson, Phase II - South of Burleson, due to the Harbor Bridge construction; However, LAN will deliver Total Project Costs for each and will not split the proposed costs by Phase. 3. Opinions of Costs will be based on 2021 dollars. 4. Phase II excludes maintenance costs associated with drainage structures, streets, and utilities. 5. Phase II excludes costs for jetties , groins, or breakwater structures that may be required for beach erosion or to prevent siltation/sedimentation at canal exits ; further study is needed to determine the costs of these structures; LAN assumes that this analys is would be performed once one of the options were chosen to move to preliminary design. Sitework / Earthwork / Dredging 6. To achieve the greatest benefit from any new stormwater system, properties need to be raised; therefore, LAN will assume a maximum elevation of 6.5 -feet at the most upstream end of the drainage basin and assume the site will slope downward towards the proposed stormwater conveya nce improvements. 3 7. Dredging frequency and maintenance costs will be determined based on comparisons with projects of similar nature; detailed modeling to qua ntify the amounts of siltation or sedimentation occurring at the entrance/exits of the c hannels or within the channels will not be performed during this phase of the project. 8. For Options 2 and 3 only, earthwork / fill will be costed based on a phased approach; LAN will provide three separate opinions of costs for: • Phase I - Public ROW and areas immediate adjacent to the drainage improvements • Phase II - Privately owned lots at elevations lower than 3.5-feet • Phase III - Privately owned lots at elevations higher than 3.5 -feet 9. Option 3 (A&B) will require dredging into Bay to a depth of 10 -feet for navigability Structural 10. LAN will assume 30-foot bulkhead depth for Options 3A and 3B 11. Two costs for bulkhead material options will be pr ovided: structural steel and concrete Mobility 12. Raising and widening of streets will be estimated based on a phased approach for each option: • Phase I - Streets immediately adjacent to or required to be improved to support proposed drainage improvements • Phase II - Streets located in those areas that are prone to tidal flooding affects 13. Traffic Improvements (Capacity, Striping, Routing of Traffic) at Beach Avenue and US181 will be included in costs for all options . 14. Option 2 - at-grade crossings / culverts will be assumed at all roadway crossings 15. Only Options 2 and 3(A&B) will include new pedestrian facilities within the drainage easement / ROW 16. Option 3A - two traffic crossings (bridge) will be assumed over the proposed navigabl e canal at Beach Avenue and Bridgeport; the crossings will have accommodations for pedestrian traffic as well as vehicle traffic 17. Option 3B - one traffic crossing (bridge) will be assumed over the proposed navigable canal at Surfside / Burleson outlet to Ba y; Beach Avenue will include a new at -grade/culvert crossing 18. One pedestrian bridge will estimated for Option 3B, at a location to be determined 19. Proposed bridge crossings will be assumed to have a low chord of 20 -feet above water surface. Utilities 20. Options 2 and 3 will include relocations of three existing wastewater lift stations 21. Wastewater collection lines and force main within the drainage easements / ROW that conflict with the proposed improvements (all options) will be relocated 22. Water - 12-inch PVC water main along east side of Surfside will remain in place but will require to be lowered under canal for Option 3 23. Water distribution and laterals within the drainage easements / ROW that conflict with the proposed improvements will be relocated for all options 24. Three underground city gas lines crossing the Timon Surfside corridor must be lowered below the proposed drainage structures - all options 4 Real Estate and ROW 25. Options 2 and 3 assume that approximately 25 acres of private property will be required to be acquired prior to construction of the drainage improvements south of Burleson. 26. Real Estate costs are not based on appraisals but typical local costs/acre for similar tracts of land. Environmental 27. Assume that coordination with USACE will be necessary for wetlands mitigation / avoidance for all Options. 28. Assume an Individual Permit will be necessary 29. Assume no conflicts with cultural resources or threatened and endangered species 30. Assume Option 3 will require a lease from the GLO for submerged lands in the path of the dredged navigable canal 5 Basic Services (Phase II – Proj ect Costs) Phase II will consist of all efforts required to estimate the costs of each of the three options above: Task 100 – Data Collection & Project Management Task 101 – Conceptual Layouts & Existing Utilities Task 102 – Opinions of Probable Project Costs Task 103 – Technical Memorandum Task 100 – Data Collection & Project Management 1. Data Collection LAN will g ather and review readily-available reports and City-provided planning documents including long and short -range plans, area development plans, capital improvement plans , GIS data bases including streets and utility master plans. This will include a detailed review of HDR’s 2018 North Beach Report and Urban Engineering’s 2019 Report. 2. Meetings a. Kickoff Meeting – LAN will conduct one (1) kick off meeting with the client to discuss the clients ’ vision for the project, scope of work, schedule, budget, change management plan, and deliverables. b. Client Review Meeting – LAN will conduct one (1) client review meeting with the City to present results from the various analyses and modeling , conceptual designs /layouts and discuss opportunities and/or scope of project going forward. c. Phase II Presentation - LAN will conduct one (1) presentation to City Council to present results from the various analyses and modeling, conceptual designs/layouts and discus s opportunities and/or scope of project going forward. Task 101 – Conceptual Layouts & Existing Utilities 1. Conceptual Layouts LAN will utilize the information gathered in Task 100 to develop conceptual level layouts for each of the three options including improving those layouts presented for Options 3A and 3B in LAN’s Phase I report according to discussion with the City staff. Because two of the three options were not part of LAN’s Phase I Report, these options will require exhibits to be made that align with the previous consultants recommendations and the vision / direction of the City of Corpus Christi. Conceptual site layouts will show proposed stormwater / drainage improvements (open channels, ditches, underground conveyance systems), areas that will require to be raised to achieve positive drainage and prevent routine tidal influence and ponding , street improvements, structures, pedestrian facilities and park amenities . Layouts will delivered on 11x17 plan sheets with one (1) typical cross section for each option. Options 3A and 3B cross sections presented in Phase I will not change. 6 2. Existing Utilities Maps a. Third-Party Utility Research – LAN will complete an 811 ticket to identify third-party utilities that may be in conflict with pr oposed project improvements and include the locations of those utilities on the existing utilities maps. This work will not include subsurface utility engineering (SUE) or identifying the depth of existing utilities using pot - holing or other SUE methodologies. LAN will complete one (1) phone call or virtual meeting with each of the third-party utility owners to ask or answer questions about the locations of their utilities. b. LAN will utilize the GIS data collected from the City of Corpus Chris ti (Task 100) and develop existing utility base maps for water, wastewater, stormwater, and gas utilities using ARC -GIS software. c. LAN will tabulate all existing utilities in a matrix spreadsheet. This tool could be used to track conflicts and relocations as the project develops further. Task 102 – Opinions of Probable Project Costs 1. Cost Determination LAN will utilize the information gathered and research available databases such as the RSMeans, TXDOT Statewide Monthly Construction Cost Averages, and CIVCAST, to develop conceptual level opinions of probable costs for each of the options listed above. Project c osts for each option will be separated into the following major categories: • Permitting / Regulatory • Land / Right-of-Way • Design / Surveying / Testing (10% of Construction) • Construction • Project / Program Management (4% of Construction) • Project Continency (25% or total) Construction Costs will include the following sub-categories: • General • Sitework / Earthwork / Dredging • Stormwater Conveyance • Structural / Bridge • Mobility / Transportation • Utilities 2. Cost Validation / Quality Control LAN will perform an internal quality control review of the opinions of probable projects costs in accordance wit h LAN Quality Control / Assurance Best Management Practices. 7 Task 103 – Technical Memorandum 1. Draft Memorandum LAN will complete a Draft Technical Memorandum that includes the results and determinations made in the tasks above. The report will include descriptions of the features and improvements recommended for each option, summarize the data used and resources to determine unit costs, and summarize project costs for each option. The report Appendices will include project exhibits , existing utility data, and the detailed opinions of probable costs for each option. 2. Final Report - LAN will receive review comments from the client and incorporate those into a final, signed, and sealed technical memorandum. 8 Summary of Fees / Schedule LAN proposes to complete Phase II of this project on a lump sum basis for a total contract amount $123,745.00. The following table summarizes the fees associated with each task under this proposal: Task Proposed Fee Task 100 – Data Collection & PM $ 9,319.00 Task 101 – Conceptual Layouts & Existing Utilities $ 52,636.00 Task 102 – Opinions of Probable Project Costs $ 41,210.00 Task 103 – Technical Memorandum $ 20,580.00 Phase II Total $ 123,745.00 The work detailed above will be substantially complete in 8-weeks from Notice to Proceed. Labor Rates: The following are LAN’s labor rates for the personnel assigned to this project: Personnel Rate / Hr Principal-in-Charge / Regulatory Support $ 267.00 Senior Project Manager $ 240.00 Quality Control Manager $ 234.00 Project Manager $ 205.00 Right-of-way Manager $ 256.00 Senior Bridge Engineer $ 240.00 Utility Coordinator $ 212.00 Structural Engineer $ 190.00 Engineer VI $ 186.00 Right-of-way Agent $ 163.00 Senior Designer $ 160.00 Engineer II $ 108.00 Engineer I $ 102.00 CAD /GIS $ 119.00 9 Level of Effort: 897 7 12 16 66 48 40 156 64 152 Total PIC Sr PM QCM PM ROW Mgr Sr Bridge Util Coord Structural Engr VI ROW Agent Engr II Engr I Designer CADD Phase and/or Hours 267.00$ 240.00$ 234.00$ 205.00$ 256.00$ 240.00$ 212.00$ 190.00$ 186.00$ 163.00$ 108.00$ 102.00$ 160.00$ 119.00$ Task Code Task Description 100.1 Data Collection 44 8 4 16 16 100.2 Meetings 15 3 6 6 101.1 Conceptual Layouts 205 1 12 64 128 101.2 Third-Party Utility Research 96 16 40 40 101.2 Develop Utility Maps 64 4 4 16 16 24 101.2 Utility Matrix 38 2 4 16 16 102.1 Cost Determination 266 1 1 8 12 8 12 8 24 12 20 160 102.2 Cost Validation / Quality Control 23 1 2 8 8 4 103.1 Draft Technical Memorandum 116 1 1 4 16 2 12 40 40 103.2 Final Technical Memorandum 30 1 1 4 2 2 4 8 8 Total 897 7 12 16 66 12 8 48 8 40 12 156 296 64 152 Labor Category Option 1 - Closed Conduit / Underground System Improvements Proposed New Box Culvert System Proposed Outfall to Bay Re-Grading of Existing Ditch Proposed New Ditch Project also includes installation of cross drainage culverts and re-grading of east-west roadside ditches Project Boundary Project Boundary Project Boundary Exhibit 1 Two Drainage Areas North = 65 acres South = 75 acres Total Project Area = 140 acres Option 2 -Open Channel / Linear Park Proposed Open Channel / Linear Park Project Boundary Existing Two Drainage Areas will be rerouted to one center channel Total Project Area = 200 acres Proposed Open Channel / Linear Park Project Boundary Proposed Box Culvert for Circulation Proposed Outfall to Bay Project also includes raising of streets along channel and raising of properties and rights-of-way to achieve positive drainage towards proposed channel. EXHIBIT 2 Option 3A -Navigable Canal (Outfall at North Jetties) Proposed Navigable Canal Proposed Navigable Canal Project Boundary Proposed Outfall to Bay Project also includes raising of streets along channel and raising of properties and rights-of-way to achieve positive drainage towards proposed channel. Project Boundary Proposed Canal Outfall to Bay Existing Two Drainage Areas will be rerouted to one center channel Total Project Area = 200 acres EXHIBIT 3A Option 3B -Navigable Canal (Outfall thru Beach) Proposed Navigable Canal Proposed Navigable Canal Project Boundary Proposed Outfall to Bay Project also includes raising of streets along channel and raising of properties and rights-of-way to achieve positive drainage towards proposed channel. Project Boundary Proposed Outfall to Wetlands for Circulation Existing Two Drainage Areas will be rerouted to one center channel Total Project Area = 190 acres EXHIBIT 3B Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas 2019 2023 thru Description On December 17, 2019, the City of Corpus Christi City Council passed an ordinance (# 031970) authorizing the design and construction of a navigable canal on North Beach in Corpus Christi, Texas. This budget is for the pre-design of the navigable canal’s scope and project limits as well as determining if the navigable canal will be functional for its intended use of being navigable and of being a major drainage facility. Based on the findings of Phase I, a design contract will be presented to City Council in January 2021. Project #20277 Priority 2 Critical- Asset Condition\longe Justification To meet both drainage and flood mitigation, as referenced in FEMA, Floodplains documentation. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: Policy Statements pg. 48: 1,3 & 6; pp. 55, 56 & 58-60; 2009 Storm Water Master Plan (draft); Sustainability Initiative Budget Impact/Other This project is in pre-design phase. As soon as project is designed, additional information will be available to estimate on-going expenses. Useful Life 25 years Project Name North Beach Navigable Canal Category Site Improvements Type Improvement/Additions Contact Executive Director of Public Wo Department Storm Water Status Active Total2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Expenditures 500,000500,000Design 8,9888,988Engineering Svc 508,988 508,988Total Total2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Funding Sources 508,988508,988Revenue Bonds 508,988 508,988Total 618 DATE: February 24, 2021 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Heather Hurlbert, Director of Finance & Business Analysis heatherh3@cctexas.com 361-826-3227 CAPTION: Ordinance approving the amended Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Project & Financing Plan approved by the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone Number Three, City of Corpus Christi, Texas on January 26, 2021. SUMMARY: This Ordinance approves the Sixth Amendment to the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Amended Project and Financing Plan, which will incorporate changes to both the Chaparral Street Grant Program to include Mesquite Street in the Marina Arts District and the New Tenant Commercial Finish-Out Grant Program to help expedite micro-grants to small businesses. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: City staff and staff from the Downtown Management District (DMD) continuously evaluate and seek opportunities to improve the TIRZ #3 Project and Financing Plan to stimulate growth within the TIRZ #3. Since 2016 when five incentive programs were developed, the TIRZ #3 has utilized all five programs to leverage approximately $10 million in incentives with over $168 million in project development. In that time, property values for these developments have increased nearly $35 million and are expected to significantly increase over the next few years as valuations catch up to the larger and more recent developments, in addition to projects currently under construction. The last amendment to the Project and Financing Plan occurred on September 30, 2020 and included changes in the programs to provide more aggressive incentives based upon the remaining rehabilitation hurdles and economics across all five incentive programs. To improve facilitation of downtown development projects, on January 26, 2021, the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Board made a motion to amend the Project and Financing Plan to incorporate the following changes to two of the programs. Ordinance approving Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) #3 Amended Project and Financing Plan AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of March 16, 2021 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of March 23, 2021 1) Chaparral Street Property Improvement Grant Program a. Will be renamed the Vacant Building Rehab Program b. The existing program was created to encourage specific types of development and activate vacant buildings along Chaparral Street which is identified as a Main Street for Downtown. While Chaparral Street is still a strong focus, the DMD has identified property owners along Mesquite Street that are interested in activating their vacant buildings where this program would facilitate that redevelopment. The proposed new boundary for both streets would include North Chaparral Street from Coopers Alley to I-37 and North Mesquite Street from Coopers Alley to I-37. 2) New Tenant Commercial Finish-Out Grant Program a. The amendment will establish an administrative approval process for the New Commercial Tenant Finish-Out Program for micro-retail applicants for a grant up to $10,000. A “typical” micro-tenant occupies less than 1,500 square feet and has a project cost of less than $50,000. Due to the success of the administrative approval process for the Streetscape Program and the now quarterly meetings of the TIRZ #3 Board, this would be an effective tool to move small projects forward without the need to call a special TIRZ #3 meeting for approval. This program will also be approved by the City Manager, or his designee, and administered by the DMD and City Staff. Approved agreements will be reported to the TIRZ #3 Board at the next Regular Meeting following the award. ALTERNATIVES: City Council could choose not to incorporate the sixth amendment to the Project and Financing Plan or make recommended changes. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Funding Detail: Fund: N/A Organization/Activity: N/A Mission Element: N/A Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the amended Project and Financing Plan. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Amended Project & Financing Plan Ordinance approving the amended Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Project & Financing Plan approved by the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone Number Three, City of Corpus Christi, Texas on January 26, 2021. WHEREAS, in 2008, through Ordinance 027996, the City of Corpus Christi created a tax increment financing district, to be known as “Reinvestment Zone Number Three, Corpus Christi, Texas,” over a portion of the city that includes the City’s downtown area; WHEREAS, Ordinance 027996 included a preliminary reinvestment zone financing plan; WHEREAS, on August 25, 2015, the City Council passed Ordinance 030592, which approved the “Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Amended Project & Financing Plan”; WHEREAS, the “Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Amended Project & Financing Plan” was last amended by City Council on December 8, 2020; WHEREAS, on January 26, 2021, the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone Number Three passed a motion recommending an amendment to the “Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Amended Project & Financing Plan” that expands the Chaparral Street Property Improvement Program to allow incentives for properties on N. Mesquite St and amends the New Commercial Tenant Finish Out Program to allow administrative approval of grants under $10,000; WHEREAS, Texas Tax Code Section 311.011(d) provides that the governing body of the municipality that designated the zone must approve a project plan or reinvestment zone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Council approves the Project Plan and Reinvestment Zone Financing Plan for Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3, Corpus Christi, Texas for the Reinvestment Zone Number Three, City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as approved by the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone Number Three on January 26, 2021. A copy of the Plan is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the _____ day of ___________, 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the _____ day of __________ 2021, by the following vote: Paulette M. Guajardo________________ John Martinez ________________ Roland Barrera ________________ Ben Molina ________________ Gil Hernandez ________________ Mike Pusley ________________ Michael Hunter ________________ Greg Smith ________________ Billy Lerma ________________ PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ______ day of _________________, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________ ________________________ Rebecca Huerta Paulette M. Guajardo City Secretary Mayor City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 1 | P a g e Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Amended Project & Financing Plan Introduction Tax Increment Financing is an economic development tool authorized by Chapter 311 of the Texas Tax Code, through which governments can designate a portion of tax increment to finance improvements to promote development of a defined area, called a “Reinvestment Zone.” The defined area must meet one of the five criteria outlined in Chapter 311. In 2008, through Ordinance 027996, the City of Corpus Christi created Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 (“TIRZ #3” or “the Zone”), over a portion of the city that includes the city’s Downtown area. There have been three amendments to the ordinance; expansion of boundaries (April 2009), correction of termination date (March 2012) and correction of board composition (August 2014). A change in the economic climate immediately after the creation of TIRZ #3 hindered the performance of the fund and prevented any investment from occurring. Throughout this time, there has not been an update to the Preliminary Project & Financing Plan in the 2008 Ordinance. This document, the 2015 Amended Project & Financing Plan, is intended to replace the previous Project & Financing Plan and any future amendments will modify this version. This 2015 Amended Project & Financing Plan is based on research conducted for the Downtown Area Development Plan (DADP), completed. Upon completion of the DADP, there will be an amendment to refine aspects of the 2015 Amended Project & Financing Plan. TIRZ #3 consists of a Board of Directors and is supported by the City Manager’s designee, currently the City’s Business Liaison, and the Executive Director of the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District (DMD). Second Amendment (FY 2017) – To continue and enhance the Zone’s efforts, this Amendment provides for programming and services from the DMD; refines some of the Incentive Programs; and provides the ability for TIRZ funds to be expended for public, cultural and/or historic properties within the Zone. Updates also include the commitment from Del Mar College’s extended participation to the end of the Zone. Note: Schedule of Project Expenditures (Page 7) updated as Exhibit C – FY 2017 Project Plan Budget. Third Amendment (FY 2018) – this Amendment renames the (5) Site Assembly & Development category to (5) Site Management & Development and discusses a pilot vacant building program in the Reinvestment Zone. Additionally, both (6) Parking Management and (7) Traffic Pattern and Streetscapes expand to authorize funding for implementation. (8) Other Programs and Initiatives expands to include Cultural District Plan, upon Board’s approval of the DMD’s FY 2018 Scope of Services. Note: Schedule of Project Expenditures updated as Exhibit C – FY 2018 Project Plan Budget. Fourth Amendment (FY 2019) – this Amendment extends the four Incentive Programs for an additional 3-year period and includes the new FY 2019 Budget as Exhibit C. It also provides an updated Sources of Revenue table showing the projected revenue of the TIRZ over time. City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 2 | P a g e Fifth Amendment (FY 2021) – this Amendment incorporates implementation that occurred in FY 2020 and refines parameters for more aggressive incentives for FY 21 based upon the remaining rehabilitation hurdles and economics. Sixth Amendment (FY 2021) – this Amendment modifies two incentive programs to expand their impact – New Commercial Tenant Finish Out and Chaparral Street Property Improvement Grant. Criteria for Zone Creation The 2008 Project Plan stated that the defined area of TIRZ #3 qualified for designation as a “Reinvestment Zone” because it suffered from “economic stagnation, inadequate infrastructure, and deteriorating properties. Without intervention by the public sector, private market forces will not be sufficient to generate significant development and redevelopment.” Conditions listed that met the Criteria of Chapter 311, Section 005 included:  A substantial number of substandard, slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;  The predominance of defective or inadequate sidewalk or street layout;  Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;  The deterioration of site or other improvements; and  Conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other cause. According to Chapter 311, these conditions must “substantially arrest or impair the sound growth of the municipality or county creating the zone, retard the provision of housing accommodations, or constitute an economic or social liability and be a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use.” Conditions in 2008 met these requirements, as indicated by the Market and Economic Study undertaken at that time. While our community has benefitted from a boost in economic activity since 2008, the Downtown did not see the same level of development. This solidifies the 2008 position that conditions would not be overcome or corrected without significant intervention and assistance from the public sector. A Consistent Vision for Downtown For decades, efforts had been made to improve and revitalize Downtown Corpus Christi, with various levels of success. The 2006 Downtown Redevelopment Vision resulted in the creation of TIRZ #3, but a change in environment prevented immediate implementation. Other efforts have included: 2004 – Bayfront Master Plan 2006 – Downtown Redevelopment Report 2013 – Central Business Development Plan 2014 – RUDAT 2015 – Downtown Area Development Plan The 2006 Redevelopment Report vision statement is consistent with the vision illustrated in the 2015 Downtown Area Development Plan, which is currently in draft form. “Downtown Corpus Christi is a safe, clean, pedestrian friendly community comprised of a central business district, arts and culture, sports and entertainment areas. This unique vibrant waterfront community will provide local residents, tourists and families’ opportunities to enjoy fine restaurants, shops and residential facilities.” City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 3 | P a g e Anticipated Zone Role in Downtown Improvements The 2008 Market and Economic Study indicated the nature of the intervention and assistance needed to spur economic growth in different areas of the Zone. It stated that the “current structure of Corpus Christi’s economy, the aging of existing development, and inadequate public infrastructure and facilities together depress the viability of new development and redevelopment in Downtown.” The 2014 Analysis of Residential Market Potential repeated those themes, with extra emphasis on residential development and introduction of the concept of gap financing. Additionally, the 2015 environment has the new dynamic of regional investment valued at tens of billions of dollars. The primary functions of TIRZ #3 will be • To Support Private Sector Development & Investment • To Plan & Construct Public Improvements • To Provide Revitalization Focused Programs & Services The Zone is expected to be one of a variety of planned funding sources and programs that will be acting in concert to accomplish a changed public environment in Downtown. By improving and enhancing streets, sidewalks, and public spaces, plus upgrading utilities, the zone and the other programs will encourage the development of new land uses and the redevelopment or rehabilitation of existing uses. The intended result is that Downtown will become a vibrant and economically vital urban waterfront district with a variety of residential, retail, and lodging uses, a strong office base, and popular public facilities. Project Plan Existing Uses and Conditions/Boundaries §311.01 (b) (1) The Zone includes approximately 856 acres wholly within the City of Corpus Christi. Its boundaries encompass nearly all of the Downtown area. A very wide variety of land uses are present within the TIRZ. The boundaries and land uses within the Zone are shown in Exhibit A. The existing conditions within the Zone are described generally below. A legal description of the Zone with a specific accounting for the proposed boundaries is given in Exhibit B. In the 2015 DADP, the identities of neighborhoods in the Downtown were emphasized as way to build unifying identities and create distinct experiences. Each of those regions is described generally below. SEA District - A large area of publicly owned cultural and entertainment facilities comprises the north end of the zone. These facilities include:  Port of Corpus Christi’s Ortiz Center  Corpus Christi Museum of Science & History  Art Museum of South Texas  Whataburger Field  American Bank Convention Center & Arena  Harbor Playhouse  Brewster Street Icehouse  Heritage Park – Restored Historic Homes, now used as Non-Profit Offices or Cultural Museums. Moving south, the next few blocks vary between vacant, undeveloped land and low density residential, bordered to the west by Port facilities and storage space, southeast by the Port of Corpus Christi Offices and the Federal Courthouse. The southern portion of the SEA District also includes two restaurants, a City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 4 | P a g e vacant hotel, U-Haul, Fire Station #1 and the historic Nueces County Courthouse. IH 37 is the physical southern border of this area, with the transition from a highway to on and off ramps coming to surface grade. Uptown – South of IH 37, a natural bluff distinguishes the high-rise, office building core of the Uptown. Broadway marks a topo-graphical change as the edge of a bluff, and the higher elevation area to the west of the street north of Lipan Street is characterized mainly by professional office uses, some in high-rise towers. TIRZ #3 picks up two blocks of Uptown, with Tancahua as the west border. Of Downtown’s office properties, only the Frost Bank building is one of two Class “A” properties. Overall occupancy for the Downtown office market is around 80 percent. Outside of the Zone, Uptown continues to include major government anchors, including Corpus Christi Independent School District Offices, Nueces County Courthouse, a Regional Transportation Authority Service Center and Corpus Christi City Hall. Marina Arts District (Downtown Management District) – The area east of Broadway is lower in elevation and features a walkable pedestrian grid with a mix of land uses, including hotels, office, residential and retail. The boundary of this neighborhood is based on the petition of property owners that created the Downtown Management District in 1993. This area is the historic center of Corpus Christi, but many of the original buildings have been demolished, due to neglect or natural disasters. The last large wave of construction occurred in the 1980’s. The most recent large scale private investment is currently under construction, a $27 million residential property with ground floor retail, the Cosmopolitan. The area is interspersed with surface parking lots and vacant, blighted property. In several places, public spaces and sidewalks are in deteriorated condition. Another unique feature of this neighborhood is the Corpus Christi Municipal Marina, spanning three man- made T-heads along the Bayfront. The Marina is comprised of over 600 slips, several restaurants and the Corpus Christi Yacht Club, the third oldest yacht club in the Gulf Coast. Bayshore Park Neighborhood – At Kinney Street, the Zone gets divided by a redundancy of roadways and a few vacant parcels. This portion of the Zone includes the YMCA, a Greek Orthodox Church, Episcopal Church, Methodist Church and several parks. Additionally, there is a mix of early 20th century single family homes and multi-family residential developments. The multi-family developments are truly a diverse mix, including high rise and mid-rise, market rate and affordable, ownership and rental, constructed at all different times with various architectural styles. Many of the original homes, especially at the south end of the neighborhood, have been converted to professional office use. This neighborhood would lend itself to the revitalization seen in older neighborhoods across the country, however an absence of neighborhood support services prevents the unification necessary to create this self identity. A potentially defining feature of this neighborhood is the 34 acres of park land for which the City is currently undergoing a Design-Build process to complete a Bond 2008 project that relocated traffic lanes to unite a patchwork of public space. The southeastern corner of the zone includes the Emerald Beach hotel and Marina del Sol condominiums. This neighborhood abuts the Christus Spohn Shoreline hospital complex. Christus Spohn Shoreline is just outside TIRZ #3 Boundaries, but the system is planning a $325 million investment in the community in the coming years. City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 5 | P a g e Municipal Ordinances §311.011 (b) (2) The City may modify existing ordinances in order to make the area in and around TIRZ #3 more friendly to the types of residential and recreational activity desired. Some other policies that will be updated include building design, setbacks and streetscape requirements, in order to establish a built environment that supports the downtown character. City Planned Improvements (Non Project Costs) §311.011 (b) (3) The City of Corpus Christi has over $ million in improvement projects currently funded and in some stage of planning or construction, independent from this TIRZ #3 Project Plan. The City will continue to use Bonds packages a major source of public improvement funding. Relocation §311.011 (b) (4) No relocation of existing residents is anticipated to be required as part of the Project Plan. Financing Plan Estimated Project Cost Description (§311.011 (c) (1) & Kind, Number and Location of TIRZ Improvements §311.001 (c) (2) TIRZ #3 is anticipated to participate in projects that support the development and economic activity projected in the DADP, especially when cost of development creates a gap due to utility or infrastructure conditions. The initial focus is on residential and mixed-use development. Exceptions may be made to the guidelines below for catalytic projects with Board approval. Such changes will be incorporated at the next Project Plan Amendment. 1. Chaparral Street Targeted Vacant Property Improvement Grant Program – This three-year matching grant program will support and encourage private investment in the built environment along Chaparral Street and Mesquite Street for active businesses. Due to its “Main Street” characteristics and its function of connecting the Marina Arts District (Downtown Management District Boundary) and SEA District, Chaparral Street is a first phase priority for successful revitalization of the Zone. During FY 2016-2021, TIRZ #3 will make $200,000 available per year to match approved property improvements funded by the property owners. The Zone will consider from a 50/50, on renovation costs, depending on how the scope of the project meets the priorities of the Zone. A 20% incentive cap had been adopted for FY 16 – FY 20 but this will be waived for FY 21. A max of $100,000 is available Project Source Timeframe Cost Status as of 09/2020 Shoreline Realignment Bond 2008 Ongoing $13,000,000 Done SEA District Improvements Bond 2012 2015-2016 $500,000 Under Construction Chaparral St. Phase II Bond 2014 2015-2016 $9,000,000 Done Water Street Improvements Bond 2014 2015-2016 $5,000,000 Done Streetscape Improvements Bond 2014 2015-2015 $1,500,000 Done Wayfinding Program HOT Funds 2015 $200,000 On Hold Shoreline Crosswalks Bond 2018 2021 Pending Design Downtown Lighting Bond 2018 2021 Pending Design Total $29,200,000 City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 6 | P a g e for a single project in a single fiscal year. Applications will be accepted until the allocation is exhausted for each fiscal year. In FY 2021, the program will be extended to Mesquite Street in the Marina Arts District to facilitate development of targeted vacant buildings. 2. New Tenant Commercial Finish-Out Grant Program– In order to activate vacant spaces, support mixed-use developments and the demand for more dining and entertainment venues in the Downtown, the Zone will reimburse approved leasable new tenant finish-outs at a maximum rate of $10 per square foot. Additionally, since it has become clear that existing inventory is not white box ready, 50% of Mechanical, Electrical or Plumbing Costs (Up to $20,000) will be available to the landlord with a new tenant if that landlord provides a 6-month rent waived lease. First-floor, active street use projects will be a priority consideration. During FY 2016- 2021, $100,000 will be allocated annually. Qualified finish out expenses include: floor and wall upgrades, HVAC, kitchen equipment, awnings and other permanent, semi-permanent fixtures. Grant is reimbursable to the Tenant, but written approval must come from Landlord in application. Applications will be accepted until the allocation is exhausted for each fiscal year. This program will also be available for expedited $10,000 micro -grants to be approved by the City Manager, or his designee, and administered by DMD and City Staff. Approved agreements will be reported to TIRZ #3 Board at the next Regular Meeting following award. 3. Downtown Living Initiative – The Residential Demand Study conducted for the DADP stated that over the next 5 years, 1,850 new units could be absorbed in the greater downtown if the threshold made investment attractive. Apartment occupancy was 94.2% in the first Quarter of 2015 (industry considers 96% to be full occupancy). In order to stimulate development, for FY 2016-2021, the Zone will provide a $10,000 per unit reimbursement grant for multi-family developments of over 3units that meet the required design criteria. Applications will be accepted until the allocation is exhausted for each fiscal year, and allocations may be split between years and committed in advance. 4. Project Specific Development Agreement – In situations where higher development costs create a financing gap, TIRZ #3 can provide assistance to property owners or developers through a Development Agreement for reimbursement of net new tax increment. A pro-forma is required to qualify for up to 75% reimbursement of the new taxes for 10 years if a development is 5,000 sq. ft or creating 25 or more new residential units. If further gap exists, staff will undertake additional third party review to justify any additional reimbursement, based on the “but, for” principle. The qualifying cost elements for this Program include:  Environmental Remediation/Code Compliance  Historic Preservation  Structured Parking  Urban Design/Landscaping  Public Improvements/Utilities Further, Residential Developments over 10 Units may be considered as an individual cost element For catalytic projects with per unit development cost above $100,000, a 10% threshold will be considered based on available funding, up to $20,000 per unit. City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 7 | P a g e 5. Site Management & Development – Beginning in FY 2017, TIRZ #3 will develop a program to facilitate activation of vacant properties within the Zone and propose to City Council adoption of a downtown vacant building ordinance. The program will establish minimum requirements for vacant properties and designate registered properties as eligible for incentives or emergency funding. Funding will be allocated to establish and administer the program. In order to activate strategically located properties, TIRZ #3 may place properties under option and work towards developing proposals for development, then assist in acquisition and development of the properties. Additionally, the Zone may purchase properties outright for redevelopment and dispose of properties, if approved by the Board. Under this initiative, funding may also be expended for stabilization or redevelopment of public, cultural and/or historic properties. 6. Parking Study & Development– In key locations where parking is undersupplied or inadequately distributed, the Zone can assist in providing public parking facilities such as on-street spaces or off- street lots and structures. TIRZ #3 will conduct a study in FY 2016 in order to develop a strategic approach for parking in the Downtown and fund implementation steps. Additionally, the Zone may support any efforts City may undertake for appropriate parking management infrastructure such as meters, lot improvements, structured garages and occupancy monitoring systems. 7. Traffic Pattern Study & Streetscapes – TIRZ #3 may contribute to studies for traffic movement and improvements in roadway infrastructure (repaving, repair, widening, redesign), traffic management infrastructure (signals, signs), and beautification (landscaping in medians, special lighting, etc.) The Zone will contribute up to $150,000 for a traffic pattern study as the first phase of this initiative. Additionally, pedestrian accommodations and streetscapes will be a priority. Funds may also be expended on implementation of infrastructure improvements, as budgeted and listed below:  Streetscape Program – Funding $200,000 for Right of Way and Façade improvements to increase lighting and security beginning FY 18, funded annually after. Micro-grants are able to be administered by DMD and City Staff.  Artesian Park - $150,000 Initial Funding in FY 20, then $50,000 Annual for La Retama & Artesian.  Two Way Conversion Shoreline to Water Street – Up to $400,000 (Funded FY 20, Rolled to FY 21)  General Right of Way Maintenance - $50,000 Annually.  Broadway Bluff Maintenance and Repair Assessment - $150,000 (Funded FY 20, Rolled to FY 21) 8. Other Programs & Initiatives – TIRZ #3 will develop other programs and initiatives that will be presented to the Board for approval, during the life of the Zone. Each year, the following initiatives are being added:  FY 2017 - Downtown Management District Bike Share Initiative  FY 2017 - Downtown Management District Expanded Scope of Services City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 8 | P a g e  FY 2018 – Downtown Management District – Cultural District Plan, TIRZ #3 Incentive Programs, registration process for downtown vacant building program, Streetscape Safety & Right of Way Improvement Program and Off-Street Parking Improvement Program.  FY 2019- Unified brand implementation and expanding organizational and operational capacity.  FY 2020- Implementation of approved projects from TIRZ #3 Traffic & Planning Analysis, specifically Artesian Park Upgrades.  FY 2021- Capital Maintenance for public spaces and right of ways throughout the zone and continued capital maintenance. 9. Management & Professional Services- Zone funds will compensate for the costs of ongoing administration of the Zone, including but not limited to accounting, legal services, consulting services, document production and maintenance, and other administrative costs. These costs were originally estimated at $50,000 per year for the 20-year life of the Zone, but to date the only dollars expended have been for state reporting requirements. Staff plans to strategically engage outside resources to evaluate revenue projections and continue to develop innovative, effective programs. Economic Feasibility Study §311.011 (c) (3) The 2008 Market and Economic Feasibility Study for TIRZ #3 was completed by CDS Market Research l Spillette. In 2014 and 2015, Goody Clancy completed additional studies that reflect the more recent environment, and emphasize the importance of residential development in any revitalization. Those studies include:  Residential Market Potential (Zimmerman/Volk) – final  Retail Market Analysis & Strategy (Mike Berne) – draft  Hotel, Office, Retail (W-ZHA, Sarah Woodworth) – draft  Incentives & Development Economics (W-ZHA, Sarah Woodworth) – draft Estimate of Bonded Indebtedness §311.011 (c) (4) It was not anticipated that TIRZ would issue bonded debt, but would be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. If the annual revenue and available non-bonded debt financing are insufficient to address the needs of TIRZ #3, we may issue bonded debt commensurate with the specific project costs under consideration and anticipated annual Zone revenues to support debt service payments. Timing of Incurring Costs or Monetary Obligation §311.011(c) (5) Costs will be incurred over the life of the Zone based on its Board of Directors’ identification of priority activities and projects, opportunities for implementation, and available revenues to sustain a pay-as-you- go project expenditure approach. The following table summarizes proposed planned expenditures for TIRZ #3 until FY 2019. Another set of programs will be proposed in FY 2018, based on an assessment of needs at that time. Schedule of Project Expenditures FY FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beg. Bal $1,563,751 $2,333,342 $1,730,387 $1,540,935 $1,631,307 City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 9 | P a g e + New Increment1 794,591 997,045 1,160,548 1,440,372 1,615,149 1 Chaparral Street Grant Program2 200,000 200,000 200,000 2 New Tenant Commercial Finish Out Grant Program2 100,000 100,000 100,000 3 Downtown Living Initiative2 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4 Project Specific Development Agreement3 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 5 Site Assembly & Development 6 Parking Study & Development 100,000 7 Traffic Pattern Analysis & Streetscapes 150,000 8 Other Programs & Initiative 9 Management & Professional Services 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Expenditure Totals 25,000 1,600,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 50,000 TIRZ Ending Balance 2,333,342 1,730,387 1,540,935 1,631,307 3,196,456 Notes: 1 Increment Projection developed by CCREDC, will be monitored closely to ensure program allocations 2 Program allocations will be authorized each Fiscal Year. 3 Incentive available will be based on the amount of investment and increment generated by private sector. Method of Financing and Sources of Revenue §311.011(c) (6) Methods of Financing. TIRZ #3 will initially take a primarily pay-as-you-go approach to financing projects that could utilize the following methods:  Cash funds generated from existing property value increment,  Developer cash reimbursement agreements where the revenues from the Zone’s property tax increment compensate a developer for fronting eligible expenditures in a specific taxable project.  If future Zone revenues to support debt service payments are anticipated, the Zone may also issue bonded debt, the term of which will not extend past the expected life of the Zone. Sources of Revenue. The primary source of revenue for TIRZ #3 will be funds from the contributed property tax collections of the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, and Del Mar College on the taxable property value increment within TIRZ #3. The City, County, and Del Mar College have agreed to participate in funding TIRZ #3 with 100% of the incremental property taxes collected over the life of the Zone.. The assessed value base year for the City of Corpus Christi is 2009; the base year or Nueces County and Del Mar College is 2010. The 2018 adjusted projection of incremental property tax revenue contributed to the Zone is as follows: Sources of Revenue Year Increment Value Tax Revenue City County Del Mar City County Del Mar TOTAL FY 10 $ 8,655,793 $ 50,400 $ - $ - $ 50,400 FY 11 21,931,954 4,698,427 4,674,139 127,703 16,488 12,059 156,251 FY 12 22,782,697 15,449,665 15,290,811 129,988 54,227 39,451 223,666 FY 13 43,910,295 38,988,148 38,041,488 250,533 136,845 98,148 485,526 FY 14 57,920,528 52,767,539 51,604,697 338,988 179,932 129,355 648,275 See Exhibit C for FY 2017 Update of Project Budget City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 10 | P a g e FY 15 71,728,002 65,346,609 63,906,562 419,798 216,258 158,535 794,591 FY 16 90,003,549 81,996,244 80,189,287 526,758 271,358 198,928 997,045 FY 17 104,763,037 95,442,631 93,339,356 613,140 315,858 231,550 1,160,548 FY 18 130,022,872 118,455,186 115,844,781 760,977 392,016 287,380 1,440,372 FY 19 145,800,015 132,828,691 129,901,537 853,315 439,583 322,251 1,615,149 FY 20 173,112,004 157,710,826 154,235,343 1,013,162 521,928 382,616 1,917,707 FY 21 189,976,968 173,075,373 169,261,300 1,111,867 572,776 419,892 2,104,534 FY 22 207,413,655 188,960,778 184,796,638 1,213,917 625,347 458,431 2,297,695 FY 23 225,441,446 205,384,699 200,858,623 1,319,428 679,700 498,276 2,497,404 FY 24 244,080,379 222,365,390 217,465,110 1,428,515 735,896 539,472 2,703,883 FY 25 263,351,172 239,921,727 234,634,557 1,541,300 793,997 582,065 2,917,362 FY 26 283,275,244 258,073,223 252,386,047 1,657,908 854,068 626,102 3,138,077 FY 27 303,874,743 276,840,056 270,739,314 1,778,469 916,174 671,631 3,366,275 FY 28 325,172,564 296,243,083 289,714,756 1,903,118 980,387 718,704 3,602,209 FY 29 347,192,382 316,303,874 309,333,466 2,031,992 1,046,776 767,373 3,846,141 $ 35,963,109 These estimates will continue to be monitored and adjusted annually. Current Appraised Value & Estimated Captured Appraised Value §311.011(c)(7), (8) According to the Nueces County Appraisal District, the 2009 certified taxable appraised value for the Zone is $310,019,372. The table above projects taxable value increment captured by the Zone over the remainder of its duration, if all taxing entities continue participation. Due to differences in policies regarding exemptions and tax abatements, the captured increment differs among the three jurisdictions. Captured value projections See Below for FY 2019 Update of Sources of Revenue Fiscal Year City County Del Mar Total City County Del Mar TOTAL FY 10 8,938,611 - - 8,938,611 50,400 - - 50,400 FY 11 21,931,959 4,698,427 4,674,139 31,304,526 127,703 16,488 12,059 156,251 FY 12 22,782,697 15,449,269 15,290,811 53,522,776 129,988 54,227 39,451 223,666 FY 13 43,910,295 38,987,148 38,041,488 120,938,931 250,533 136,845 98,148 485,526 FY 14 56,814,718 51,751,996 50,602,120 159,168,834 332,516 176,474 126,842 635,832 FY 15 61,641,842 57,170,457 55,257,674 174,069,974 359,150 189,203 137,079 685,432 FY 16 73,819,407 81,480,890 80,084,765 235,385,063 447,540 254,977 198,669 901,186 FY 17 82,672,144 96,768,777 95,440,711 274,881,633 501,211 294,266 234,936 1,030,413 FY 18 90,723,843 94,622,680 98,178,819 283,525,342 550,026 287,740 241,676 1,079,442 FY 19 96,280,721 110,962,179 117,040,051 324,282,951 583,715 337,427 288,105 1,209,247 FY 20 105,165,951 111,267,007 123,927,631 340,360,589 637,583 338,354 305,059 1,280,996 FY 21 112,055,614 127,652,230 144,304,130 384,011,974 679,353 388,180 355,218 1,422,751 FY 22 121,974,293 130,414,841 155,674,539 408,063,674 739,486 396,581 383,207 1,519,274 FY 23 130,351,758 147,214,456 178,552,529 456,118,743 790,276 447,667 439,523 1,677,466 FY 24 141,527,057 152,497,010 194,956,096 488,980,162 858,028 463,731 479,902 1,801,661 FY 25 151,580,816 170,089,008 221,442,870 543,112,694 918,980 517,227 545,102 1,981,309 FY 26 164,264,179 178,010,361 243,673,527 585,948,067 995,875 541,315 599,824 2,137,014 FY 27 176,220,443 196,790,562 275,051,046 648,062,051 1,068,361 598,424 677,063 2,343,848 FY 28 190,697,246 207,528,945 304,184,757 702,410,948 1,156,129 631,079 748,778 2,535,986 FY 29 204,825,030 227,919,904 341,971,692 774,716,626 1,241,780 693,086 841,794 2,776,661 Bold=Actuals 12,418,634$ 6,763,292$ 6,752,435$ 25,934,361$ Sources of Revenue Year Tax RevenueIncrement Value City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 11 | P a g e assume a 2.5% annual value appreciation rate for existing development, based on actual property value growth and do not take into account future investments. Duration of the Zone §311.011(c)(9) TIRZ #3 will exist until 2028, however, the Board, City and other taxing entities may agree to extend the Zone. City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 12 | P a g e List of Exhibits Exhibit A TIRZ #3 Boundaries and Land Uses Exhibit B Legal Description Exhibit C FY 2017 Project Plan Budget FY 2018 Project Plan Budget FY 2019 Project Plan Budget FY 2021 Project Plan Budget City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 13 | P a g e Exhibit A – Boundaries & Land Use City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 14 | P a g e Exhibit B - Legal Description of the Zone BEGINNING AT A POINT on the center line of the Corpus Christi Ship Channel and commonly known as the Corpus Christi – Port Aransas Waterway at its intersection with the northerly extension of the West right-of-way line of Sam Rankin Street; Thence Easterly along the centerline of the Corpus Christi – Port Aransas Waterway to its intersection with the northerly extension of a line parallel with the breakwater 50’ feet on the east side for a point in the Corpus Christi Bay and the Northeast corner; Thence Southerly along said line, being 50 feet on the East side and parallel with the breakwater, following the meanders of the breakwater in the Corpus Christi Bay to its intersection with an “A-2” zoning line approximately 1,000 feet from the shoreline and parallel with the East right-of-way line of Shoreline Boulevard for a point in the Corpus Christi Bay; Thence Southwesterly along said “A-2” zoning line extending parallel and approximately 1,040 feet from the East right-of-way line of South Shoreline Boulevard to its intersection with a second “A-2” zoning line extending parallel and approximately 1,000 feet from an existing 18 foot seawall easement, inside the Marina Del Sol Boat Harbor, for a point in the Corpus Christi Bay; Thence Southeasterly along said line 200 feet more or less past its intersection with the easterly extension of the south most boundary of Lot 3, Block 1 of Marina Del Sol Subdivision for a point in the Corpus Christi Bay and the Southeast corner; Thence Southwest along a line 200 feet more or less to the South and parallel with the extension of the south boundary of Lot 3, Block 1 of Marina Del Sol Subdivision to the Corpus Christi Bay Shoreline; Thence Northwest along the Corpus Christi Bay Shoreline to its intersection with the extension of the South most boundary of Lot 3, Block 1 of Marina Del Sol Subdivision; Thence Southwest along the South boundary of Lot 3, Block 1 of Marina Del Sol Subdivision, 540 feet more or less to the centerline of Ocean Drive for a point; Thence Northwest along the centerline of Ocean Drive to its intersection with the centerline of Morgan Avenue; Thence Southwest along the centerline of Morgan Avenue, to a point in the center line of Santa Fe Street for the Southwest corner; Thence Northwest along the centerline of Santa Fe Street to its intersection with the centerline of Hancock Street; Thence Southeast along the centerline of Hancock Street to its intersection with the centerline of South Tancahua Street:; Thence Northerly along the centerline of South Tancahua Street, passing Furman, Coleman, Park, Agnes, and Laredo Street, to a point in the centerline where South Tancahua becomes North Tancahua, and continuing along North Tancahua, passing Kinney, Blucher, Comanche, Lipan, Leopard, Antelope and Buffalo Street and continuing past IH 37 to its intersection with the centerline of the existing northwest frontage road of I.H. 37, for a point; Thence Northeast along the centerline of said existing northwest frontage road of I.H. 37 to its intersection with the South right-of-way line of West Broadway Street for a point; Thence along the South right-of-way line of West Broadway Street to its intersection with the westerly extension of the South right-of-way line of Concrete Street for a point; Thence Northeasterly along the South right-of-way line of Concrete Street extended, to its intersection with the north right-of- way line of West Broadway Street, for a point; Thence Northwesterly along the North right-of-way line of West Broadway Street to the Southeast property line of the City of Corpus Christi’s Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant; Thence Northeasterly along the City of Corpus Christi’s Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Southeast property line to its intersection with the common South boundary line of Lots 1, Block 58 of the Beach Addition; Thence West along the South boundary line of Lot 1, Block 58 out of the Beach Addition, to its Southwest corner for a point; City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 15 | P a g e Thence Northwest along the common, West boundary line of Lots 1 thru 6, Block 58, of the Beach Addition, to its intersection with the South right-of-way line of Resaca Street; Thence Northeast along the South right-of-way line of Resaca Street to its intersection with the centerline of Tancahua Street, for a point; Thence Northwest along the centerline of Tancahua Street to its intersection with the centerline of Port Avenue, for a point; Thence Southwest along the centerline of Port Avenue, to its intersection with the West right-of-way line of Sam Rankin Street for an outside corner; Thence Northerly along the West right-of-way line of Sam Rankin Street and its extension to its intersection with the centerline of the Corpus Christi – Port Aransas Waterway center line in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Excluded properties to meet state statute prohibiting Tax Increment Financing Districts from containing 10% or more of the area used for residential purposes: Beach Addition Block 55 Lots 10 thru 12 City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 16 | P a g e Exhibit C Proposed Budget FY 2018: Year FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2018 FY 2019 Budget Actual Budget Estimated Proposed Future Beg. Bal 2,297,833$ 2,253,569$ 2,953,576$ 2,992,483$ 3,388,432$ 2,459,705$ + Increment Revenue 994,117$ 914,191$ 1,127,852$ 1,070,317$ 1,291,273$ 1,614,091$ 1 Chaparral St. Grant Program 200,000$ 71,942$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 200,000$ -$ 2 New Tenant Commercial Finish Out Grant Program 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ 15,000$ 100,000$ -$ 3 Downtown Living Initiative 1,000,000$ -$ 905,000$ -$ 725,000$ 1,300,000$ 4 Project Specific Development Agreement -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5 Site Management & Development -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 6 Parking Study & Development 100,000$ 98,534$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 150,000$ -$ 7 Traffic Pattern Analysis & Streetscapes 150,000$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 8 Other Programs & Initiatives -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 395,000$ 420,000$ 9 Management & Professional Services 50,000$ 4,801$ 50,000$ 9,368$ 50,000$ 50,000$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,600,000$ 175,277$ 1,805,000$ 674,368$ 2,220,000$ 2,770,000$ End Bal 1,691,950$ 2,992,483$ 2,276,428$ 3,388,432$ 2,459,705$ 1,303,796$ FY 2017 See Below for FY 2018 Update of Project Budget See Below for FY 2019 Update of Project Budget City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 17 | P a g e Proposed Budget FY 2019: Proposed Budget FY 2021: Account Description Actuals Original Amended Estimated Adopted 2018 - 2019 Budget Budget 2019 - 2020 2020 -2021 2019 - 2020 2019 - 2020 TIRZ#3 Project Plan $18,964.00 $ - $68,145.00 $ - $ - Chaparral St Grant Program $101,469.00 $200,000.00 $400,000.00 $279,585.00 $200,000.00 New Tenant Commercial Finish Out $61,700.00 $100,000.00 $106,490.00 $14,378.00 $100,000.00 Downtown Living Initiative $ - $ - $1,665,000.00 $1,665,000.00 $ - Development Tax Reimbursement $ - $ - $15,000.00 $ - $370,000.00 Site Management and Development $152,151.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Downtown Vacant Bldg. Code Enforcement $1,989.50 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $5,884.00 $25,000.00 Parking Meter Replacement $ - $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $ - $100,000.00 Off-street Parking Improvement $ - $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $ - $ - Traffic Pattern Analysis $ - $400,000.00 $550,000.00 $550,000.00 $350,000.00 Streetscape & Safety Improvements $18,246.00 $200,000.00 $345,735.00 $348,259.00 $200,000.00 DMD Agreement $376,317.00 $510,000.00 $532,016.00 $532,016.00 $510,000.00 Management & Professional Services $111.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $ - $4,000.00 Transfer to General Fund $55,102.00 $127,082.00 $127,082.00 $127,081.51 $126,924.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $786,049.50 $1,791,082.00 $4,063,468.00 $3,522,203.51 $1,985,924.00 See Below for FY 2021 Update of Project Budget City of Corpus Christi / Corpus Christi Downtown Management District 18 | P a g e