The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet City Council - 01/23/2024 o',A.,5r.,f,�r s City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi,TX 78401 _ x w cctexas.com \ Meeting Agenda - Final-revised City Council Tuesday,January 23,2024 11:30 AM Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, 602 N. Staples St., 2nd Floor Board Room(Rm. 210) Addendums may be added on Friday. Public Notice: Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingles es limitado, habra un interprete ingles-espanol en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. This meeting may be held via videoconference call pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.127. If this meeting is held via videoconference call or other remote method of meeting, then a member of this governmental body presiding over this meeting will be physically present at the location of this meeting unless this meeting is held pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.125 due to an emergency or other public necessity pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.045. A. Mayor Paulette Guajardo to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Reverend Claude Axel, Mount Pilgrim Baptist Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States and to the Texas Flag to be led by Aubrey Guerra, Junior at Moody High School. D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. SECURITY BRIEFING F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: (ITEMS 1-2) 1. 24-0123 Staff Announcement: Drew Molly, P.E., Chief Operating Officer of Corpus Christi Water 2. 24-0124 January 15 - January 17, 2024 Extreme Weather Event Debrief City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 1/22/2024 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final-revised January 23, 2024 G. PUBLIC COMMENT-APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. To speak during this public comment period, you must sign up before the meeting begins. Each speaker is limited to a total of no more than 3 minutes per speaker. You will not be allowed to speak again on an item when the Council is considering the item. Time limits may be restricted further by the Mayor at any meeting. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Written comments may be submitted at cctexas.com/departments/city-secretary. Electronic media that you would like to use may only be introduced into the City system IF approved by the City's Information Technology (IT) Department at least 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact IT at 826-3211 to coordinate. This is a public hearing for all items on this agenda. H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed;may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance;or may modify the action specified. J. RECESS FOR LUNCH The City Council will take a lunch break at approximately 1:30 p.m. K. INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION ITEMS: (ITEMS 3-10) The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will be considered and voted on individually. 3. 24-0095 Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas authorizing the private placement issuance of its Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds with the Texas Water Development Board in one or more series (as designated by purpose and series) for water, wastewater, and stormwater utility improvements in an amount not to exceed $211,050,000, within set parameters; making provisions for the payment and security thereof by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the City's Utility System on a parity with certain currently outstanding Utility System Revenue Obligations; stipulating the terms and conditions for the issuance of additional revenue bonds on a parity therewith; prescribing the form, terms, conditions, and resolving other matters incident and related to the issuance, sale, and delivery of one or more paying agent/registrar agreements and one or more escrow agreements; complying with the requirements imposed by the letter of representations previously executed with the Depository Trust Company; complying with the regulations promulgated by the Texas Water Development Board; delegating authority to the City Manager, the Chief City of Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 1/22/2024 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final-revised January 23, 2024 Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement to execute certain documents relating to the sale of each series of bonds; authorizing the execution and approval of a financing agreement between the City and the Texas Water Development Board related to the bonds; enacting other provisions incident and related to the subject and purpose of this ordinance; and providing an effective date. sponsors: Finance &Procurement 4. 24-0096 Resolution relating to the City's intention to reimburse itself for the prior lawful expenditure of funds relating to any capital expenditures from the proceeds of one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations to be issued by the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $211,050,000 for authorized purposes; authorizing other matters incident and related thereto; and providing an effective date. sponsors: Finance &Procurement 5. 24-0099 Resolution authorizing execution of all documents necessary to make an abridged and full application to the Texas Water Development Board for an amount up to $535,110,000 for the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant from the State Water Implementation Fund to complete the Project. sponsors: Corpus Christi Water 6. 24-0111 Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas authorizing the private placement issuance of its Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds with the Texas Water Development Board in one or more series (as designated by purpose and series) for water, wastewater, and stormwater utility improvements in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000, within set parameters; making provisions for the payment and security thereof by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the City's Utility System on a parity with certain currently outstanding Utility System Revenue Obligations; stipulating the terms and conditions for the issuance of additional revenue bonds on a parity therewith; prescribing the form, terms, conditions, and resolving other matters incident and related to the issuance, sale, and delivery of one or more series of bonds; appropriating the proceeds from the sale of the bonds; authorizing the execution of one or more paying agent/registrar agreements and one or more escrow agreements; complying with the requirements imposed by the letter of representations previously executed with the Depository Trust Company; complying with the regulations promulgated by the Texas Water Development Board; delegating authority to the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement to execute certain documents relating to the sale of each series of bonds; authorizing the execution and approval of a financing agreement between the City and the Texas Water Development Board related to the bonds; enacting other provisions incident and related to the subject and purpose of this ordinance; and providing an effective City of Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 1/22/2024 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final-revised January 23, 2024 date. Sponsors: Finance &Procurement 7. 24-0098 Ordinance authorizing the execution of all documents necessary to apply for and accept the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Grants for the construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant; and appropriating funds. Sponsors: Corpus Christi Water 8. 24-0072 Ordinance authorizing the execution of all documents with American Electric Power, Texas, associated with construction of the interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the Electric Council of Texas electric transmission grid in the amount of$3,062,880, and for the conveyance of property rights and/or modifications of existing contracts for the purchase of real property to transfer interest(s) in property as required by American Electric Power, Texas or its authorized related entities for the construction of said project, located in Council District 1 with FY 2024 funding available from the City's State Water Implementation Revenue Fund Texas Loan-2020. Sponsors: Utilities Department 9. 24-0073 Ordinance authorizing amendment number three to the Master Services Agreement with Freese and Nichols in an amount up to $3,779,994 for to the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project for Procurement Support Services for a total amount not to exceed $9,033,994; appropriating $3,779,994 from the Raw Water and Drought Surcharge funds reserve balances; and amending the FY 2024 Capital and Operating Budgets. Sponsors: Contracts and Procurement, Engineering Services and Utilities Department 10. 23-1882 Resolution determining the costs of improvements to be financed within Improvement Area #1 of the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 and approving a preliminary service and assessment plan (PSAP), including a proposed improvement area #1 assessment roll. Sponsors: Economic Development L. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEM 11) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. 11. 24-0087 Approval of the November 16, 2023 Joint Workshop Minutes, December 6, 2023 Joint Workshop Minutes, and January 9, 2024 Regular Meeting City of Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 1/22/2024 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final-revised January 23, 2024 Minutes. Consent-Second Reading Ordinances Consent- Contracts and Procurement Consent- Capital Projects General Consent Items Consent-First Reading Ordinances K. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 12-13) The following items are public hearings and public hearings with first reading ordinances. Each item will be considered individually. 12. 24-0092 Ordinance adopting Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans relating to the possible future adoption of water, wastewater, stormwater, and roadway impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction; and amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by adopting related Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, Stormwater Master Plan, and Roadway Master Plan. sponsors: Development Services 13. 23-2047 Ordinance abandoning, vacating, and closing 8.0118 acres of improved and unimproved public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle, between Yorktown Blvd and Oso Creek, conditioned on the Petitioner, MPM Development, LP, construction of Osito Way, Mapache Pass, and a portion of Oso Parkway and meeting other conditions. sponsors: Public Works/Street Department M. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 14-15) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. If the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer. The City Council may deliberate and take action in open session on any issue that may be discussed in executive session. The description of an item in "Executive Sessions" constitutes the written interpretation by the City Attorney of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code and his determination that said item may be legally discussed in Closed Meeting in compliance with Chapter 551 the Texas Government Code. 14. 23-2045 Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the potential exchange of City of Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 1/22/2024 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final-revised January 23, 2024 properties owned by the City and Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation at 1208 Peabody Avenue & 1622 Van Loan Avenue with properties owned by the Port of Corpus Christi at 2011 Palm Drive & 2101 Van Loan Avenue and Texas Government Code § 551.072 to discuss and deliberate the potential exchange of said properties with the Port of Corpus Christi. 15. 24-0078 Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning industries, infrastructure, utilities, and property in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, services thereto, industrial district agreements, and Chapters 42, 43 and 212 of the Texas Local Government Code and Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss and deliberate regarding potential financial or other incentive(s) to business prospects(s) that the governmental body seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City will be conducting economic development negotiations N. ADJOURNMENT City of Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 1/22/2024 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OFFICE OF THE CITY' MANAGER TO: Mayor and Cite Council FROM: Peter Zanonw-e-A COPY: Executive'I'can1 SUBJECT: Staff Announcement DATE: January 9, 2024 1 have appointed Drew Moll`. P.E..as Chiel'( lperatin Officer effective Monday,Januar}' 8. Drew has served a-• Interim C:hief'Operatin`,Officer effective %Vednesday, September 13. In this position. lie ,,\-]]] he r,.�ponsible for overseeing the Corpus Christi «Vater Department (CCW). f tv\� j,,mi:J tiic (' tv in September 2022 as Director of'W"ater Systerns and Support lirr CC`k'. I le hors over 16 years of e.r'perience in municip i1 ,overnnient, leading na1111CFOLIS 111,0"ranls and services as they relate to water and wastewater crperations. Prior to joining the City of Corpus Christi, Drew served as the Director of Drinking Water 0l7ert1t1011s Inr the City_ of I Inuston- In this position. lie oversaw the City of Houston's water system and \%cis resp(}nsible 10r over 600 cmplo ec,, in Operations and Maintenance Budget of 5180 illillion. cuad -a ('apitnl ]mprcareilients Plein liml�lct (A' S200 million. He worked for the City of I Imist(m since 2000 and prion- to his role ,is Director. lie served as Assistant Director of Water Operations and ,'Managing Engineer of\1'aicr ()perutions. In 2021. Drc\v sen eel as the Chair of the Temis Section of American Water'Vorks Association. Drew holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering degree from `texas A&M Llniversity — College Station. He maintains a TCE.Q Class A %Vater Operator License. Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new position. I have appointed Nick Winkelmann, 1'.Ii., as Interim Director of Water Systems and Suf)pOrt Service,, fir CCW effective Monday, January 8. l le has served as Assistant Director of Plannim, and lilt"restructure for CCW since Septeinber 2023. Nick joitied CCW in Juty 2021 as the Plannlnt-, and Fn-ineering Manager for CCW. Prior tojoining the: City. he worked for over 24 years in the private water sector. Nick holds both a 1caclielor of` Scicnce in [icolouical Engineerino and a Master of' Business Administration tram \1issouri Science :wd 1 vc1molw-w. 1. Attached: Updated Or2ani7ational Chart effective January 9. 2024 lanuary8,2024 City of Corpus Christi Qrganizational C?-.ar; Ei= Ei= Lommunicationst LibrariesAssistant to City Manager [iry Attorney Laura Garcia &Intergovernmental!Affairs' Sany Perone) es lks Logan Cobbs' Ryan Skcobarayk' Deputy City Manager Michael Rodriguez Assistant Chy Manager Assistant City Manager Chief Financial Officer Assistant City Manager Corpus Christi Water - Steve Viera Neiman Young Police Constance Sanchez Heather Hvribert Chief Operating Officer Orew Mo4ly Chief Mike Markle Health District" L Engineering Services I Finance It Procurement _ Parks&Recreation Director of Water Systems Fauzia Khan Jeffrey Edmonds Alma Ca—(Inter!mi Robert Dodd Nick Winkelmann(interim) Fire Chief Brandon Wade _ Devebpment Services Public Works Management&Budget _ Airport Director of Water Utilities .A!Raymond Ernesto De La Garza Eddie Houlihan Kevin Smfch Wes Nebgen Human Resources Planning& Rebecca Castillo(Interim) Comm unity Devefepment -- Solid Waste [Girt Administration eathEconMictlevetoperi Daniel McGurn David Lehfeld: Strategic Planning& Gilbert Hernandez Heather Hudherc(IntenmJ innovation �,. /mean Aaenrw,)cisco Asset Mana ement Gas Scott Greene Animal Care Services I.eeaeoe:reeatk C-1—My g L Information Technology a.C�.i h,Kti ,,k,:1ut R,q,t tdte BrettVan Hazel Bill Mahaffey Constance Sanchez 3,Corpm chnsH Hoak::[Ihy R.rahcdela (Interim) PeterCotlins s,C.vendonwhit.,aureau: calre,w,16" 'Includes txai wealth Authnrey 5.Type qra eaard:rieath,,IIUHd+rt Dr.R-ha rdry ni 6.D.wnlwwn.Management Mruict: n rather Iluehcri S 00 Oki U NCOHP00.Pt�'� 1852 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 30, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Alma I. Casas, Interim Director of Finance and Procurement almac@cctexas.com (361) 826-3610 Delegating the Authorization for the Issuance of Utility System Revenue Improvement Bonds (SWIFT II Tranche 2) CAPTION: Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas authorizing the private placement issuance of its Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds with the Texas Water Development Board in one or more series (as designated by purpose and series) for water, wastewater, and stormwater utility improvements in an amount not to exceed $211,050,000, within set parameters; making provisions for the payment and security thereof by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the City's Utility System on a parity with certain currently outstanding Utility System Revenue Obligations; stipulating the terms and conditions for the issuance of additional revenue bonds on a parity therewith; prescribing the form, terms, conditions, and resolving other matters incident and related to the issuance, sale, and delivery of one or more paying agent/registrar agreements and one or more escrow agreements; complying with the requirements imposed by the letter of representations previously executed with the Depository Trust Company; complying with the regulations promulgated by the Texas Water Development Board; delegating authority to the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement to execute certain documents relating to the sale of each series of bonds; authorizing the execution and approval of a financing agreement between the City and the Texas Water Development Board related to the bonds; enacting other provisions incident and related to the subject and purpose of this ordinance; and providing an effective date. SUMMARY: The City intends to issue $211,050,000 of Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds funded by the Texas Water Development Board State Water Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT) Loan Program to build the Inner Harbor Desalination Water Treatment Plant. The amount of bond issuance included in the ordinance includes estimated costs of issuance and accounts for any fluctuations in the bond market at the time of pricing. The ordinance delegates the authority to issue the bonds to the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, or the Director of Finance and Procurement within the parameters set forth in the ordinance. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The SWIFT loan program was created by the Texas Legislature to provide affordable, ongoing state financial assistance for projects in the state water plan. The program helps communities develop cost-effective water supplies by providing low-interest loans, extended repayment terms, deferral of loan repayments, and incremental repurchase terms. Through fiscal year 2019, SWIFT committed over $8.3 billion for projects across Texas. To apply for funding, entities must first submit an abridged loan application for their projects to be evaluated. The projects are ranked and the top projects that are within the limits of available funding are invited to submit a full application. Once the full application is evaluated and approved, TWDB offers financing through the loan program. The interest rate charged by the TWDB is based on the TWDB's cost of funds sold with the State of Texas' General Obligation AAA rating. The lending rate balances reasonable rates for TWDB customers that cover TWDB's cost of funds and risk exposure. Utilization of the TWDB funding option is being recommended especially since the interest rate that will be charged for these obligations is based on a AAA rating -- which is a higher rating than the City's AA-/Aa3 rating for its utility priority lien bonds and junior lien utility bonds therefore resulting in a lower interest rate. In addition, the SWIFT loan program provides a percentage subsidy reducing the interest rate. The City entered into a multi-year annual commitment loan through the SWIFT Loan Program with the Texas Water Development Board in Fiscal Year 2020 for a total amount of$222,475,000 for the purpose of building a desalination water treatment plant. On October 13, 2020, the City Council passed a resolution to issue the first tranche of this multi-year annual commitment loan for an amount of$11,425,000. The City is now ready to issue the second tranche of the bonds for the remaining amount of$211,050,000. Because of the fluctuating conditions in the municipal bond market and to ensure that all legal documents are executed on a timely basis, our Financial Advisor and our Bond Counsel (Norton, Rose, Fullbright) has recommended that the City Council delegate to the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement - including any person serving in any of the foregoing capacities on an interim or non-permanent basis (the "Authorized Officials") the authority to approve the sale of the bonds subject to the following parameters: 1) The principal amount in total of all bonds sold may not exceed $211,050,000. 2) The interest rate will be set by the terms of the Texas Water Development Board SWIFT Loan guidelines. 3) Maximum maturity of 30 years. The City's bond counsel has confirmed that the City can delegate the sale of the bonds to the Delegated Officials in the manner outlined above pursuant to the authority contained in Chapter 1371, as amended, Texas Government Code. ALTERNATIVES: n/a FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this ordinance is that it will generate $211,050,000 in bond proceeds for use on the Inner Harbor Desalination Water Treatment Plant. COMMENTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT ISSUANCE OF ITS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS WITH THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN ONE OR MORE SERIES(AS DESIGNATED BY PURPOSE AND SERIES) FOR WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $211,050,000, WITHIN SET PARAMETERS; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE PAYMENT AND SECURITY THEREOF BY A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN ON AND PLEDGE OF THE NET REVENUES OF THE CITY'S UTILITY SYSTEM ON A PARITY WITH CERTAIN CURRENTLY OUTSTANDING UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE OBLIGATIONS; STIPULATING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL REVENUE BONDS ON A PARITY THEREWITH; PRESCRIBING THE FORM, TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF BONDS;APPROPRIATING THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ONE OR MORE PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENTS AND ONE OR MORE ESCROW AGREEMENTS; COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE LETTER OF REPRESENTATIONS PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED WITH THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY; COMPLYING WITH THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD; DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT TO EXECUTE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF EACH SERIES OF BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND APPROVAL OF A FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD RELATED TO THE BONDS; ENACTING OTHER PROVISIONS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE SUBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THIS ORDINANCE;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS,the City Council(the City Council)of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas(the City)has heretofore issued, and there are currently Outstanding, revenue bonds (the Previously Issued Parity Obligations) secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues (hereinafter defined) of the City's combined utility systems(as further described and defined herein,the System); and WHEREAS, in the City ordinances authorizing the issuance of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations,the City reserved the right to issue revenue bonds on a parity with the Previously Issued Parity Obligations(hereinafter defined) from time to time outstanding; and WHEREAS,the City Council has heretofore issued,and there are currently outstanding,obligations supported by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System that are inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Previously Issued Parity Obligations (the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations); and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined for the purpose of improving the credit quality of its Previously Issued Parity Obligations,which has become its primary lien for issuing System debt,that it will no longer issue "Priority Bonds"which were previously secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System; and 138398800.4 WHEREAS, on the date hereof, no Priority Bonds remain outstanding and all System revenue obligations previously subordinate and inferior to the Priority Bonds in priority of lien on and pledge of Net Revenues have been elevated in kind and priority as hereinbefore stated, and all Previously Issued Parity Obligations hereinbefore issued with a"Junior Lien" designation are secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues and the Bonds(defined herein)and any Additional Senior Lien Obligations (defined herein)shall be secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues on parity with the Previously Issued Parity Obligations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the Bonds and any additional bonds issued on parity with the Previously Issued Parity Obligations bear the designation"Senior Lien"to evidence the first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues is the primary lien for issuing System debt; and WHEREAS, the City Council does not intend to issue System debt bearing the "Junior Lien" designation while any Previously Issued Parity Obligations bearing the "Junior Lien" designation remain Outstanding; and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that a new series of Senior Lien Obligations payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a first and prior lien and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System on parity with the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues securing the Previously Issued Parity Obligations should be issued for the purpose of designing, planning, building, improving, extending, enlarging, and repairing the System; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1371, as amended, Texas Government Code (Chapter 1371) and Chapter 1502, as amended, Texas Government Code (Chapter 1502), and the City's Home Rule Charter,the City Council is authorized to issue revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, the Texas Water Development Board (the Purchaser) has agreed to purchase the revenue bonds herein authorized thereby making a loan to the City at an interest rate that is substantially below the current market rate for similar forms of indebtedness which will enable the City to undertake the proposed improvements to the System; and WHEREAS, [ �, �, Texas, which is not a depository bank of the City, is appointed and will serve as the Paying Agent/Registrar(hereinafter defined); and WHEREAS, [ �, �, Texas, which is not a depository bank of the City, is appointed and will serve as the Escrow Agent(hereinafter defined)for the revenue bonds; and WHEREAS,the City Council hereby finds and determines that,pursuant to applicable Texas law, the delegation to a Pricing Officer with the authority to execute an Approval Certificate (a form of which is attached hereto as Schedule I)to approve the final terms of each series of Bonds as set forth in respective Approval Certificate is in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the revenue bonds hereinafter authorized are to be issued and delivered pursuant to the laws of the State of Texas, including the Act (defined herein), and the terms of this Ordinance (hereinafter defined), for the purposes set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, as a condition precedent to securing the financing assistance with the Purchaser, the Purchaser may require that the City enter into a financing agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G; and 138398800.4 -2- WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the issuance of the revenue bonds authorized herein and the adoption of this Ordinance is in the best interests of the citizens of the City;now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Authorization-Designation-Principal Amount-Purpose. Revenue improvement bonds of the City shall be and are hereby authorized to be issued in the aggregate principal amount of [ 1 AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($[ ),to be designated and bear the title of CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2024 (the Bonds),pursuant to this ordinance adopted by the City Council(the Ordinance)for the purpose of(i)designing,planning,building,improving,extending, enlarging, and repairing the System, and(ii)paying the costs of issuance relating thereto. The Bonds shall be payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is on parity with the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations and is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations. The Bonds are authorized to be issued pursuant to the authority conferred by and in conformity with the laws of the State of Texas,including,particularly,Chapter 1371 and Chapter 1502 (collectively,the Act). As authorized by the Act, the Pricing Officer is hereby authorized, appointed, and designated as the officer of the City authorized to individually act on behalf of the City in selling and delivering one or more series of revenue improvement bonds authorized herein and carrying out the procedures specified in this Ordinance, including approval of the following terms and provisions for each series of revenue improvement bonds: A. the style of each series of bonds,which style indicates(with respect to each series of bonds) the use of proceeds thereof, calendar year of issuance, and (if necessary or desired) a letter or other sequential identification indicating that multiple series of bonds of the same or similar type have been or will be issued hereunder during a particular calendar year; B. the aggregate principal amount of each series of bonds, as well as the principal amount of each stated maturity within a series of bonds; C. the rate of interest to be borne on the principal amount of each stated maturity within a series of bonds and the interest payment dates for such series of bonds; D. the Dated Date for each series of bonds; E. the optional,extraordinary optional,and mandatory redemption provisions applicable,if at all,to each series of bonds; F. whether or not to issue such series of bonds on a taxable or tax-exempt basis and, if on a tax-exempt basis, subject to market conditions at the time of pricing and sale of such series of bonds; G. the pricing of each series of bonds, including use of premium, discount, underwriters' compensation, and costs of issuance; and H. the selection of the bond insurer and/or debt service reserve fund surety provider, if any, with respect to the Bonds. If the Pricing Officer chooses to purchase a debt service reserve surety policy or 138398800.4 -3- similar credit facility relating to the Bonds, then the Pricing Officer shall be permitted to execute an insurance or similar reimbursement agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit H(which form is hereby approved)in connection with such purchase. The Bonds shall be issued within the following parameters: A. the principal amount of the Bonds issued hereunder shall not exceed$211,050,000; B. the maximum maturity of any series of Bonds shall not occur later than July 15,2064; C. the true interest cost on each series of Bonds shall not exceed the maximum rate permitted by law; and D. the final series of Bonds hereunder issued shall be sold on or before January 30, 2025 (though the initial delivery of a particular series of Bonds may occur within a reasonable period of time occurring thereafter, as determined by the Pricing Officer). The Pricing Officer, acting for and on behalf of the City, is authorized,with respect to a series of bonds, to complete and execute an Approval Certificate, in substantially the form attached hereto as Schedule I. The execution of the Approval Certificate shall evidence the sale date of each series of Bonds by the City to the initial purchasers thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Act and as set forth in Schedule I. Upon execution of an Approval Certificate,Bond Counsel is authorized to complete a copy of this Ordinance as evidence of the issuance of a series of Bonds pursuant to the delegated authority granted hereunder and to reflect such final terms for such series of Bonds, which includes (A) completion of the preamble to this Ordinance,included deletion of those recitals that are not applicable to the particular series of Bonds then being issued, (B) selection of the appropriate terms to reflect the final transaction structure and terms of sale evidenced in an applicable Approval Certificate, and (C) such other necessary technical modifications to this Ordinance (including the renumbering of sections hereof) to accommodate all other terms and provisions of this Section 1. In addition to the foregoing, the Pricing Officer is authorized to execute,as the act and deed of the City and on behalf of the City Council,any and all contracts,agreements, letters, and certificates, relative to any series of Bonds that may be required by this Ordinance, as supplemented in the manner described above, or determined to be necessary or advisable in connection with an issuance of Bonds hereunder. It is further provided, however,that notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Bonds shall not be delivered unless prior to delivery, the Bonds have been rated by a nationally recognized rating agency for municipal securities in one (1) of the four (4) highest rating categories for long term obligations, as required by Chapter 1371. SECTION 2. Fully Registered Obligations - Authorized Denominations - Stated Maturities - Interest Rates- Dated Date. The Bonds are issuable in fully registered form only; shall be dated [� [_],2024(the Dated Date); shall be in denominations of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, shall be lettered "R-" and numbered consecutively from One (1) upward; and principal shall become due and payable on July 15 in each of the years and in principal amounts (the Stated Maturities) and bear interest on the unpaid principal amounts from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on [ [_], 2024), or the most recent Interest Payment Date(hereinafter defined)to which interest has been paid or duly provided for,to the earlier of redemption or Stated Maturity,at the rates per annum in accordance with the following schedule: Stated Maturities Jul 15 Principal Amounts ($) Interest Rates(%) 138398800.4 -4- Stated Maturities Jul 15 Principal Amounts (S) Interest Rates (%) The Bonds shall bear interest on the unpaid principal amount thereof at the per annum rates shown above, computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, and interest thereon shall be payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each year(each,an Interest Payment Date),commencing 2025,while the Bonds are Outstanding. SECTION 3. Payment of Bonds-Interest Payments-Paving Agent/Registrar. The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, due and payable by reason of Stated Maturity,redemption, or otherwise, shall be payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts, and such payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be without exchange or collection charges to the Holder(hereinafter defined)of the Bonds. Interest on each Bond issued and delivered to a Holder shall accrue from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on or about [ U,2024)or from the latest Interest Payment Date that interest on such Bond(or its Predecessor Bond)has been paid that precedes the registration date appearing on such Bond in the "Registration Certificate of Paying Agent/Registrar" (Section 8D hereof), unless the registration date appearing thereon is an Interest Payment Date for which interest is being paid, in which case interest on such Bond shall accrue from the registration date appearing thereon and provided further that with respect to the initial payment of interest on a Bond. The selection and appointment of [ 11 1�, Texas, to serve as the initial Paying Agent/Registrar(the Paying Agent/Registrar)for the Bonds is hereby approved and confirmed,and the City agrees and covenants to cause to be kept and maintained at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar books and records(the Security Register)for the registration,payment,and transfer of the Bonds, all as provided herein, in accordance with the terms and provisions of a Paying Agent/Registrar 138398800.4 -5- Agreement, attached, in substantially final form, as Exhibit A hereto, and such reasonable rules and regulations as the Paying Agent/Registrar and the City may prescribe. The City covenants to maintain and provide a Paying Agent/Registrar at all times while the Bonds are Outstanding, and any successor Paying Agent/Registrar shall be (i) a national or state banking institution or (ii) an association or a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the United States of America or of any state, authorized under such laws to exercise trust powers. Such Paying Agent/Registrar shall be subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authority and authorized by law to serve as a Paying Agent/Registrar. The City reserves the right to appoint a successor Paying Agent/Registrar upon providing the previous Paying Agent/Registrar with a certified copy of a resolution or ordinance terminating such agency. Additionally,the City agrees to promptly cause a written notice of this substitution to be sent to each Holder of the Bonds by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid,which notice shall also give the address of the new Paying Agent/Registrar. Both principal of,premium,if any, and interest on the Bonds,due and payable by reason of Stated Maturity, redemption or otherwise, shall be payable only to the registered owner of the Bonds appearing on the Security Register (the Holder or Holders) maintained on behalf of the City by the Paying Agent/Registrar as hereinafter provided(i)on the Record Date (defined herein)for purposes of payment of interest thereon and(ii)on the date of surrender of the Bonds for purposes of receiving payment of principal thereof at the Bonds' Stated Maturity or upon prior redemption of the Bonds. The City and the Paying Agent/Registrar, and any agent of either, shall treat the Holder as the owner of a Bond for purposes of receiving payment and all other purposes whatsoever, and neither the City nor the Paying Agent/Registrar, or any agent of either, shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Principal of, and premium, if any, on the Bonds shall be payable only upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds to the Paying Agent/Registrar at its corporate trust office. Interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the Holder whose name appears in the Security Register at the close of business on the last business day of the month next preceding an Interest Payment Date for the Bonds (the Record Date) and shall be paid (i)by check sent by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, by the Paying Agent/Registrar,to the address of the Holder appearing in the Security Register or(ii)by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar, requested in writing by the Holder at the Holder's risk and expense. While the Bonds are held by the Purchaser,payment of principal of,premium,if any,and interest on the Bonds shall be made by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser, to an account at a financial institution located in the United States designated by the Purchaser. If the date for the payment of the principal of,premium, if any,or interest on the Bonds shall be a Saturday, Sunday, a legal holiday, or a day on which banking institutions in the city where the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar is located are authorized by law or executive order to close,then the date for such payment shall be the next succeeding day which is not such a day. The payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made on the original date any such payment on the Bonds was due. In the event of a non-payment of interest on a scheduled payment date, and for thirty (30) days thereafter, a new record date for such interest payment(a Special Record Date)will be established by the Paying Agent/Registrar, if and when funds for the payment of such interest have been received from the City. Notice of the Special Record Date and of the scheduled payment date of the past due interest (the Special Payment Date-which shall be fifteen(15)days after the Special Record Date)shall be sent at least five (5) business days prior to the Special Record Date by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the address of each Holder appearing on the Security Register at the close of business on the last business day next preceding the date of mailing of such notice. 138398800.4 -6- SECTION 4. Redemption. A. Special Mandatory Redemption. In the event that the Purchaser at such time remains the sole holder of the Bonds and the final accounting delivered by the City to the Purchaser in the form and manner specified in Section 29 of this Ordinance evidences that the total cost of the project or projects to be financed with Bond proceeds is less than the amount of Bond proceeds available for paying such costs or if the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser disapproves construction of any portion of such project or projects as not being in accordance with the plans and specifications, then the City shall, unless an alternative is permitted under Section 29 hereof, immediately, with the filing of the final accounting, redeem Bonds in the amount of such excess and/or cost determined by the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser relating to the parts of such project or projects not built in accordance with the plans and specifications, to the nearest multiple of the authorized denomination for the Bonds. Bonds redeemed pursuant to this provision shall be redeemable on any date, as a whole or in part, in principal amounts of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity, selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar), at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. B. Optional Redemption. The Bonds having Stated Maturities on and after July 15, 20U shall be subject to redemption prior to Stated Maturity, at the option of the City,on July 15,20U,or any date thereafter,as a whole or in part,in principal amounts of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar), at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. C. Exercise of Redemption Option. At least forty-five (45) days prior to a date set for the redemption of Bonds (unless a shorter notification period shall be satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar),the City shall notify the Paying Agent/Registrar of its decision to exercise the right,or of the requirement, as applicable, to redeem Bonds, the principal amount of each Stated Maturity to be redeemed, and the date set for the redemption thereof. The decision of the City to exercise the right to redeem Bonds shall be entered in the minutes of the City Council. D. Selection of Bonds for Redemption. If less than all Outstanding Bonds of the same Stated Maturity are to be redeemed on a redemption date, the Paying Agent/Registrar shall select at random and by lot the Bonds to be redeemed, provided that if less than the entire principal amount of a Bond is to be redeemed,the Paying Agent/Registrar shall treat such Bond then subject to redemption as representing the number of Bonds Outstanding which is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Bond by$5,000. E. Notice of Redemption. Not less than thirty (30) days prior to a redemption date for the Bonds, a notice of redemption shall be sent by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid,in the name of the City and at the City's expense, by the Paying Agent/Registrar to each Holder of a Bond to be redeemed, in whole or in part, at the address of the Holder appearing on the Security Register at the close of business on the business day next preceding the date of mailing such notice,and any notice of redemption so mailed shall be conclusively presumed to have been duly given irrespective of whether received by the Holder. This notice may also be published once in a financial publication,journal, or reporter of general circulation among securities dealers in the City of New York,New York(including,but not limited to, The Bond Buyer and The Wall Street Journal),or in the State of Texas(including,but not limited to, The Texas Bond Reporter). All notices of redemption shall (i)specify the date of redemption for the Bonds, (ii)identify the Bonds to be redeemed and, in the case of a portion of the principal amount to be redeemed, the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, (iii) state the redemption price, (iv) state that the Bonds, or the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, shall become due and payable on the redemption date specified, and the interest thereon, or on the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, shall 138398800.4 -7- cease to accrue from and after the redemption date, and (v) specify that payment of the redemption price for the Bonds,or the principal amount thereof to be redeemed,shall be made at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar only upon presentation and surrender thereof by the Holder. If a Bond is subject by its terms to redemption and has been called for redemption and notice of redemption thereof has been duly given or waived as herein provided, such Bond (or the principal amount thereof to be redeemed) so called for redemption shall become due and payable,and if money sufficient for the payment of such Bonds (or of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed) at the then applicable redemption price is held for the purpose of such payment by the Paying Agent/Registrar, then on the redemption date designated in such notice,interest on said Bonds(or the principal amount thereof to be redeemed)called for redemption shall cease to accrue, and such Bonds shall not be deemed to be Outstanding in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. F. Transfer/Exchange. Neither the City nor the Paying Agent/Registrar shall be required(i)to transfer or exchange any Bond during a period beginning forty-five (45) days prior to the date fixed for redemption of the Bonds or (ii)to transfer or exchange any Bond selected for redemption, provided; however,such limitation of transfer shall not be applicable to an exchange by the Holder of the unredeemed balance of a Bond which is subject to redemption in part. SECTION 5. Execution-Registration. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by its Mayor, its seal reproduced or impressed thereon, and attested by the City Secretary, or designee. The signature of either officer on the Bonds may be manual or facsimile. Bonds bearing the manual or facsimile signatures of individuals who were, at the time of the Dated Date,the proper officers of the City shall bind the City,notwithstanding that such individuals or either of them shall cease to hold such offices prior to the delivery of the Bonds to the Purchasers (defined herein), all as authorized and provided in Chapter 1201, as amended,Texas Government Code. No Holder of a Bond shall be entitled to any right or benefit under this Ordinance, or be valid or obligatory for any purpose, unless there appears on such Bond either a certificate of registration substantially in the form provided in Section 8C, executed by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas or his duly authorized agent by manual signature for the Initial Bond only,or a certificate of registration substantially in the form provided in Section 8D for Bonds other than the Initial Bond,executed by the Paying Agent/Registrar by manual signature, and either such certificate upon any Bond shall be conclusive evidence, and the only evidence, that such Bond has been duly certified or registered and delivered. SECTION 6. Registration - Transfer - Exchange of Bonds - Predecessor Bonds. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall obtain,record, and maintain in the Security Register the name and address of every owner of the Bonds, or, if appropriate, the nominee thereof. Any Bond may, in accordance with its terms and the terms hereof, be transferred or exchanged for Bonds of other authorized denominations upon the Security Register by the Holder,in person or by his duly authorized agent,upon surrender of such Bond to the Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation,accompanied by a written instrument of transfer or request for exchange duly executed by the Holder or by his duly authorized agent, in form satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar, the City shall execute and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall register and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of authorized denomination and having the same Stated Maturity and of a like interest rate and aggregate principal amount as the Bond or Bonds surrendered for transfer. 138398800.4 -g- At the option of the Holder, Bonds may be exchanged for other Bonds and of authorized denominations and having the same Stated Maturity,bearing the same rate of interest and of like aggregate principal amount as the Bonds surrendered for exchange upon surrender of the Bonds to be exchanged at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar. Whenever any Bonds are so surrendered for exchange, the City shall execute, and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall register and deliver, the Bonds, to the Holder requesting the exchange. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be delivered at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar, or be sent by registered mail to the Holder at his request, risk, and expense, and upon the delivery thereof, the same shall be the valid and binding obligations of the City, evidencing the same obligation to pay,and entitled to the same benefits under this Ordinance,as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. All transfers or exchanges of Bonds pursuant to this Section shall be made without expense or service charge to the Holder, except as otherwise herein provided, and except that the Paying Agent/Registrar shall require payment by the Holder requesting such transfer or exchange of any fee, tax or other governmental charges required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. Bonds canceled by reason of an exchange or transfer pursuant to the provisions hereof are hereby defined to be Predecessor Bonds,evidencing all or a portion,as the case may be,of the same debt evidenced by the new Bond or Bonds registered and delivered in the exchange or transfer therefor. Additionally,the term Predecessor Bonds shall include any Bond registered and delivered pursuant to Section 27 in lieu of a mutilated, lost, destroyed, or stolen Bond which shall be deemed to evidence the same obligation as the mutilated,lost,destroyed,or stolen Bond. SECTION 7. Initial Bond. The Bonds herein authorized shall be issued initially either (i) as a single fully-registered Bond in the total principal amount of with principal installments to become due and payable as provided in Section 2 and numbered T-1,or(ii) as one(1)fully-registered Bond for each year of Stated Maturity in the applicable principal amount and denomination and to be numbered consecutively from T-I and upward(the Initial Bond)and,in either case,the Initial Bond shall be registered in the name of the initial purchasers or the designee thereof. The Initial Bond shall be the Bond submitted to the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas for approval, certified and registered by the Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas and delivered to the initial purchasers. Any time after the delivery of the Initial Bond, the Paying Agent/Registrar shall cancel the Initial Bond delivered hereunder and exchange therefor definitive Bonds of authorized denominations, Stated Maturities,principal amounts and bearing applicable interest rates for transfer and delivery to the Holders named at the addresses identified therefor; all pursuant to and in accordance with such written instructions from the initial purchasers, or the designee thereof, and such other information and documentation as the Paying Agent/Registrar may reasonably require. SECTION 8. Forms. A. Forms Generally. The Bonds, the Registration Certificate of the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas,the Certificate of Paying Agent/Registrar, and the form of Assignment to be printed on each of the Bonds shall be substantially in the forms set forth in this Section with such appropriate insertions, omissions, substitutions, and other variations as are permitted or required by this Ordinance and may have such letters, numbers, or other marks of identification (including insurance legends in the event the Bonds, or any Stated Maturities thereof, are insured and identifying numbers and letters of the Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures of the American Bankers Association) and such legends and endorsements (including any reproduction of an opinion of Bond Counsel (hereinafter referenced)) thereon as may, consistent herewith, be established by the City or 138398800.4 -9- determined by the officers executing the Bonds as evidenced by their execution thereof Any portion of the text of any Bond may be set forth on the reverse thereof,with an appropriate reference thereto on the face of the Bond. The definitive Bonds shall be printed,lithographed,or engraved,produced by any combination of these methods, or produced in any other similar manner, all as determined by the officers executing the Bonds as evidenced by their execution thereof, but the Initial Bond submitted to the Attorney General of Texas may be typewritten or photocopied or otherwise reproduced. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138398800.4 -10- B. Form of Definitive Bond. REGISTERED REGISTERED PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NO. $ United States of America State of Texas Counties of Nueces,Aransas,Kleberg, and San Patricio CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2024 Dated Date: Interest Rate: Stated Maturity: CUSIP NO: [ ] [_], 2024 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS The City of Corpus Christi,Texas(the City),a body corporate and a municipal corporation located in the Counties of Nueces, Aransas, Kleberg, and San Patricio, State of Texas, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of the Registered Owner specified above, or the registered assigns thereof,on the Stated Maturity date specified above,the Principal Amount specified above (or so much thereof as shall not have been paid upon prior redemption),and to pay interest on the unpaid Principal Amount hereof from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on [] [_], 2024)or from the most recent Interest Payment Date (hereinafter defined)to which interest has been paid or duly provided for,to the earlier of redemption or Stated Maturity, at the per annum rate of interest specified above computed on the basis of a 360-day year of 30-day months;such interest being payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year(each,an Interest Payment Date),commencing [] U,20[_]. Principal and premium, if any, of the Bond shall be payable to the Registered Owner hereof(the Holder) upon presentation and surrender, at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar executing the registration certificate appearing hereon or a successor thereof. Interest shall be payable to the Holder of this Bond (or one or more Predecessor Bonds, as defined in the Ordinance hereinafter referenced)whose name appears on the Security Register maintained by the Paying Agent/Registrar at the close of business on the Record Date, which is the last business day of the month next preceding each Interest Payment Date. All payments of principal of,premium,if any,and interest on this Bond shall be in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts. Interest shall be paid by the Paying Agent/Registrar by check sent on the appropriate date of payment by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid,to the Holder hereof at the address appearing in the Security Register or by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar, requested by the Holder hereof at the Holder's risk and expense. While the Bonds are held by the Purchaser, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser,to an account at a financial institution located in the United States designated by the Purchaser. This Bond is one of the series specified in its title issued in the aggregate principal amount of $[ ] (the Bonds) pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the governing body of the City (the Ordinance), for the purpose of (i) designing, planning, building, improving, extending, enlarging, and repairing the System, and (ii)paying the costs of issuance related thereto, all in conformity with the laws 138398800.4 _11- of the State of Texas,particularly the City's Home Rule Charter and the Act,and the Ordinance. The Bonds shall be payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is on parity with the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations and that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations. The Bonds stated to mature on and after July 15, 20" may be redeemed prior to their Stated Maturities, at the option of the City, on July 15, 20U or on any date, in whole or in part in principal amounts of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar) at the redemption price of par, together with accrued interest to the date of redemption. In the event that the Purchaser at such time remains the sole holder of the Bonds and the final accounting delivered by the City to the Purchaser in the form and manner specified in the Ordinance evidences that the total cost of the project to be financed with Bond proceeds is less than the amount of Bond proceeds available for paying such costs or if the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser disapproves construction of any portion of such project or projects as not being in accordance with the plans and specifications, then the City shall, unless the Ordinance permits another use of such excess funds, immediately,with the filing of the final accounting,redeem Bonds in the amount of such excess and/or cost determined by the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser relating to the parts of such project or projects not built in accordance with the plans and specifications to the nearest multiple of the authorized denomination for the Bonds. Bonds redeemed pursuant to this provision shall be redeemable on any date, as a whole or in part,in principal amounts of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity, selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar),at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. If this Bond(or any portion of the principal sum hereof)shall have been duly called for redemption and notice of such redemption duly given,then upon such redemption date this Bond(or the portion of the principal sum hereof to be redeemed) shall become due and payable, and, if money for the payment of the redemption price and the interest accrued on the principal amount to be redeemed to the date of redemption is held for the purpose of such payment by the Paying Agent/Registrar,interest shall cease to accrue and be payable hereon from and after the redemption date on the principal amount hereof to be redeemed. In the event of a partial redemption of the principal amount of this Bond,payment of the redemption price of such principal amount shall be made to the registered owner only upon presentation and surrender of this Bond to the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar and,there shall be issued to the registered owner hereof, without charge, a new Bond or Bonds of like maturity and interest rate in any authorized denominations provided in the Ordinance for the then unredeemed balance of the principal sum hereof. If this Bond is called for redemption, in whole or in part,the City or the Paying Agent/Registrar shall not be required to issue, transfer, or exchange this Bond within forty-five (45) days of the date fixed for redemption; provided, however, such limitation of transfer shall not be applicable to an exchange by the Holder of the unredeemed balance hereof in the event of its redemption in part. The Bonds of this series are special obligations of the City, issued as Senior Lien Obligations, payable from and equally and ratably secured by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, being (primarily)a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues derived from the operation of the City's combined utility systems (as further described in the Ordinance, the System), that is on parity with the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations and that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations. In the Ordinance,the City reserves and retains the right to issue Additional Senior Lien Obligations, Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations without limitation as to principal amount but subject to any terms, conditions, or restrictions 138398800.4 -12- set forth in the Ordinance or as may be applicable thereto under law or otherwise. The Bonds do not constitute a legal or equitable pledge,charge,lien,or encumbrance upon any property of the City or System, except with respect to the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. The Holder hereof shall never have the right to demand payment of this obligation out of any funds raised or to be raised by taxation. Reference is hereby made to the Ordinance, a copy of which is on file in the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar, and to all of the provisions of which the Holder by his acceptance hereof hereby assents, for definitions of terms; the description and nature of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues pledged for the payment of the Bonds;the terms and conditions under which the City may issue Additional Senior Lien Obligations,Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations,and Inferior Lien Obligations;the terms and conditions relating to the transfer or exchange of the Bonds; the conditions upon which the Ordinance may be amended or supplemented with or without the consent of the Holders; the rights, duties, and obligations of the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar;the terms and provisions upon which this Bond may be redeemed or discharged at or prior to the Stated Maturity thereof, and deemed to be no longer Outstanding thereunder; and for the other terms and provisions specified in the Ordinance. Capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings assigned in the Ordinance. This Bond, subject to certain limitations contained in the Ordinance, may be transferred on the Security Register upon presentation and surrender at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar,duly endorsed by,or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar duly executed by the Holder hereof, or his duly authorized agent, and thereupon one or more new fully registered Bonds of the same Stated Maturity, of authorized denominations,bearing the same rate of interest,and of the same aggregate principal amount will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees. The City and the Paying Agent/Registrar, and any agent of either, shall treat the Holder hereof whose name appears on the Security Register(i)on the Record Date as the owner hereof for purposes of receiving payment of interest hereon, (ii)on the date of surrender of this Bond as the owner hereof for purposes of receiving payment of principal hereof at its Stated Maturity, or its redemption, in whole or in part, and (iii)on any other date as the owner hereof for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Paying Agent/Registrar,or any such agent of either,shall be affected by notice to the contrary. In the event of a non-payment of interest on a scheduled payment date, and for thirty (30)days thereafter, a new record date for such interest payment(a Special Record Date)will be established by the Paying Agent/Registrar, if and when funds for the payment of such interest have been received from the City. Notice of the Special Record Date and of the scheduled payment date of the past due interest(the Special Payment Date-which shall be fifteen(15)days after the Special Record Date)shall be sent at least five (5)business days prior to the Special Record Date by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the address of each Holder appearing on the Security Register at the close of business on the last business day next preceding the date of mailing of such notice. It is hereby certified, covenanted, and represented that all acts, conditions, and things required to be performed,exist, and be done precedent to the issuance of this Bond in order to render the same a legal, valid,and binding special obligation of the City have been performed,exist,and have been done,in regular and due time, form, and manner, as required by law, and that issuance of the Bonds does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation; and that due provision has been made for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds by a pledge of and lien on the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. In case any provision in this Bond or any application thereof shall be deemed invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions and applications shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. The terms and provisions of this Bond and the Ordinance shall be construed in accordance with and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. 138398800.4 -13- [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank] 138398800.4 -14- IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Bond has been signed with the imprinted or lithographed facsimile signature of the Mayor of the City,attested by the imprinted or lithographed facsimile signature of the City Secretary, and the official seal of the City has been duly affixed to, printed, lithographed or impressed on this Bond. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (SEAL) [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138398800.4 -15- C. Form of Registration Certificate of Comptroller of Public Accounts to Appear on Initial Bond Only. REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF H PUBLIC ACCOUNTS H REGISTER NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Bond has been examined, certified as to validity and approved by the Attorney General of the State of Texas, and duly registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas. WITNESS my signature and seal of office this Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas (SEAL) *Note to Printer:Not to appear on printed Bonds D. Form of Certificate of Paying Agent/Registrar to Appear on Definitive Bonds Only. CERTIFICATE OF PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR This Bond has been duly issued under the provisions of the within-mentioned Ordinance;the Bond or Bonds of the above-entitled and designated series originally delivered having been approved by the Attorney General of the State of Texas and registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts, as shown by the records of the Paying Agent/Registrar. Registered this date: 1J 11 TEXAS, as Paying Agent/Registrar By: Authorized Signature * Note to Printer: to appear on printed Bonds E. Form of Assignment. ASSIGNMENT 138398800.4 -16- FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns, and transfers unto (Print or typewrite name, address, and zip code of transferee): (Social Security or other identifying number): the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof,with full power of substitution in the premises. DATED: NOTICE: The signature on this assignment must correspond with the name of the registered owner as it appears on the face of the within Bond in every particular. Signature guaranteed: [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138398800.4 -17- F. Form of Initial Bond. The Initial Bond shall be in the form set forth in paragraph B of this Section,except that the form of a single fully registered Initial Bond shall be modified as follows: (1) immediately under the name of the Bond(s) the headings "Interest Rate" and "Stated Maturity" shall both be completed"as shown below"; (2) the first two paragraphs shall read as follows: The City of Corpus Christi,Texas(the City),a body corporate and a municipal corporation located in the Counties of Nueces, Aransas, Kleberg, and San Patricio, State of Texas, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of the Registered Owner named above, or the registered assigns thereof, the Principal Amount specified above on the fifteenth day of July in each of the years and in principal amounts and bearing interest at per annum rates in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Principal Interest Stated Maturity Amounts M Rates (Information to be inserted from schedule in Section 2 hereof). (or so much thereof as shall not have been paid upon prior redemption) and to pay interest on the unpaid Principal Amount hereof from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on [] [_],20[x), or from the most recent Interest Payment Date(hereinafter defined)to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, to the earlier of redemption or Stated Maturity, at the per annum rate of interest specified above computed on the basis of a 360-day year of 30-day months; such interest being payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year(each, an Interest Payment Date),commencing [] [_],20[_]. Principal of this Bond shall be payable to the Registered Owner hereof (the Holder), upon its presentation and surrender, at the corporate trust office of [ ], [], Texas (the Paying Agent/Registrar). Interest shall be payable to the Holder of this Bond whose name appears on the Security Register maintained by the Paying Agent/Registrar at the close of business on the Record Date, which is the last business day of the month next preceding each interest payment date. All payments of principal of and interest on this Bond shall be in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts. Interest shall be paid by the Paying Agent/Registrar by check sent on or prior to the appropriate date of payment by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the Holder hereof at the address appearing in the Security Register or by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar,requested by, and at the risk and expense of, the Holder hereof. While the Bonds are held by the Purchaser, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser, to an account at a financial institution located in the United States designated by the Purchaser. [END OF FORMS] G. Insurance Legend. If bond insurance is obtained by the Purchasers or the City for the Bonds,the definitive Bonds and the Initial Bond shall bear an appropriate legend as provided by the bond insurer,to appear under the following header: [BOND INSURANCE] SECTION 9. Definitions. For all purposes of this Ordinance, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires: (i)the terms defined in this Section have the meanings assigned to them in this Section, and certain terms used in Sections 32 and 46 of this Ordinance have the 138398800.4 _18- meanings assigned to them in such Sections, and all such terms include the plural as well as the singular; (ii) all references in this Ordinance to designated "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Sections and other subdivisions of this Ordinance as originally adopted; and (iii)the words "herein", "hereof', and"hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Ordinance as a whole and not to any particular Section or other subdivision. A. The term Accountant shall mean a nationally recognized independent certified public accountant,or an independent firm of certified public accountants. B. The term Additional Senior Lien Obligations shall mean(i) any bonds,notes,warrants,or any similar obligations hereafter issued by the City that are payable wholly or in part from and equally and ratably secured by a lien and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, such pledge to include a pledge of Net Revenues that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof that is or will be pledged to the payment of any Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Inferior Lien Obligations now Outstanding or hereafter issued by the City, and (ii)obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues (including the Previously Issued Parity Obligations), as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. C. The term Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations shall mean (i) any bonds, notes, warrants,or any similar obligations hereafter issued by the City that are payable wholly or in part from and equally and ratably secured by a lien and pledge of the Net Revenues, such pledge being subordinate and inferior to the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is included in Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, but senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof that is or will be pledged to the payment of the Inferior Lien Obligations now Outstanding or hereafter issued by the City, and on parity with the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues securing the payment of the then-Outstanding Subordinate Lien Obligations and (ii)obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured by such subordinate and inferior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. D. The term Approval Certificate shall mean a written instrument from time to time executed by the Pricing Officer in accordance with Section I of this Ordinance. E. The term Authorized Oficial shall mean the City Manager, each Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, Director of Finance and Procurement, City Secretary, and City Attorney of the City. F. The term Average Annual Debt Service Requirements shall mean that average amount which, at the time of computation, will be required to pay the Debt Service Requirements of obligations when due and derived by dividing the total of such Debt Service Requirements by the number of years then remaining before final Stated Maturity. The calculation of Average Annual Debt Service Requirements shall be net of(1) capitalized interest from bond proceeds and (2) the receipt or anticipated receipt of a refundable tax credit or similar payment relating to a series of Senior Lien Obligations irrevocably 138398800.4 -19- designated as refundable tax credit bonds, which payment shall be treated as one offset to regularly scheduled debt service of the series of Senior Lien Obligations to which it relates. G. The term Bonds shall mean the $[ j "CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2024", dated 20[1, authorized by this Ordinance. H. The term Bond Fund shall mean the special Fund or account created and established by the provisions of Section 13 of this Ordinance. I. The term Capital Additions shall mean a reservoir or other water storage facilities, a water or wastewater treatment plant or an interest therein,an electric generation facility and/or distribution system or an interest therein, a gas distribution system or an interest therein and associated transmission facilities with respect to each and any combination thereof,which shall become a part of the System. J. The term Capital Improvements shall mean any capital extensions, improvements and betterments to the System other than Capital Additions. K. The term City shall mean the City of Corpus Christi, Texas and, where appropriate, the City Council of the City. L. The term Closing Date shall mean the date of physical delivery of the Initial Bond in exchange for the payment in full by the Purchasers. M. The term Credit Agreement shall mean a loan agreement, revolving credit agreement, agreement establishing a line of credit, letter of credit, reimbursement agreement, insurance contract, commitments to purchase Debt, purchase or sale agreements, interest rate swap agreements, or commitments or other contracts or agreements authorized,recognized,and approved by the City as a Credit Agreement in connection with the authorization,issuance,security,or payment of any obligation authorized by Chapter 1371,as amended,Texas Government Code, and which includes any Credit Facility. N. The term Credit Facility shall mean (i)a policy of insurance or a surety bond,issued by an issuer of policies of insurance insuring the timely payment of debt service on governmental obligations,or (ii) a letter or line of credit issued by any financial institution. O. The term Credit Provider shall mean any bank, financial institution, insurance company, surety bond provider, or other institution which provides, executes, issues, or otherwise is a party to or provider of a Credit Agreement or Credit Facility. P. The term Debt shall mean (1) all indebtedness payable from Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues incurred or assumed by the City for borrowed money (including indebtedness payable from Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues arising under Credit Agreements) and all other financing obligations of the System payable from Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are shown on the liability side of a balance sheet; and (2) all other indebtedness payable from Senior Lien Pledged Revenues and/or Net Revenues (except indebtedness not treated as Debt hereunder) for borrowed money or for the acquisition,construction,or improvement of property or capitalized lease obligations pertaining to 138398800.4 -20- the System that is guaranteed, directly or indirectly, in any manner by the City, or that is in effect guaranteed, directly or indirectly, by the City through an agreement, contingent or otherwise, to purchase any such indebtedness or to advance or supply funds for the payment or purchase of any such indebtedness or to purchase property or services primarily for the purpose of enabling the debtor or seller to make payment of such indebtedness,or to assure the owner of the indebtedness against loss, or to supply funds to or in any other manner invest in the debtor (including any agreement to pay for property or services irrespective of whether or not such property is delivered or such services are rendered),or otherwise. For the purpose of determining Debt,there shall be excluded any particular Debt if,upon or prior to the maturity thereof,there shall have been deposited with the proper depository(i)in trust the necessary funds(or investments that will provide sufficient funds,if permitted by the instrument creating such Debt) for the payment, redemption, or satisfaction of such Debt or (ii) evidence of such Debt deposited for cancellation; and thereafter it shall not be considered Debt. No item shall be considered Debt unless such item constitutes indebtedness under generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with the financial statements of the System in prior Fiscal Years. Q. The term Debt Service Requirements shall mean, as of any particular date of computation, with respect to any obligations and with respect to any period,the aggregate of the amounts to be paid or set aside by the City as of such date or in such period for the payment of the principal of,premium, if any, and interest(to the extent not capitalized)on such obligations; assuming,in the case of obligations without a fixed numerical rate, that such obligations bear interest calculated by assuming (i) that the interest rate for every 12-month period on such bonds is equal to the rate of interest reported in the most recently published edition of The Bond Buyer (or its successor) at the time of calculation as the "Revenue Bond Index"or,if such Revenue Bond Index is no longer being maintained by The Bond Buyer(or its successor) at the time of calculation, such interest rate shall be assumed to be 80% of the rate of interest then being paid on United States Treasury obligations of like maturity and (ii)that,in the case of bonds not subject to fixed scheduled mandatory sinking fund redemptions, that the principal of such bonds is amortized such that annual debt service is substantially level over the remaining stated life of such bonds or in the manner permitted under Section 1371.057(c), as amended, Texas Government Code as the same relates to interim or non—permanent indebtedness, and in the case of obligations required to be redeemed or prepaid as to principal prior to Stated Maturity according to a fixed schedule, the principal amounts thereof will be redeemed prior to Stated Maturity in accordance with the mandatory redemption provisions applicable thereto (in each case notwithstanding any contingent obligation to redeem bonds more rapidly). For the term of any Credit Agreement in the form of an interest rate hedge agreement entered into in connection with any such obligations, Debt Service Requirements shall be computed by netting the amounts payable to the City under such hedge agreement from the amounts payable by the City under such hedge agreement and such obligations. R. The term Depository shall mean an official depository bank of the City. S. The term Engineer shall mean an individual, firm, or corporation engaged in the engineering profession,being a registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Texas,having specific experience with respect to a combined municipal utility system similar to the System and such individual, firm,or corporation may be employed by,or may be an employee of,the City. T. The term Fiscal Year shall mean the twelve month accounting period used by the City in connection with the operation of the System which may be any twelve consecutive month period established 138398800.4 -21- by the City,presently being that period commencing on October I of each year and ending on the following September 30. U. The term Government Securities shall mean: (i)direct noncallable obligations of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America, or (ii) noncallable obligations of an agency or instrumentality of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the agency or instrumentality and that,on the date the governing body of the issuer adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds,are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than AAA or its equivalent. When the Previously Issued Parity Obligations issued on or before August 25, 2016, are no longer Outstanding, the term Government Securities, as used herein, shall mean (i) direct noncallable obligations of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America; (ii) noncallable obligations of an agency or instrumentality of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the agency or instrumentality and that, on the date the governing body of the issuer adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds,are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than AAA or its equivalent; (iii)noncallable obligations of a state or an agency or a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of a state that have been refunded and that, on the date the governing body of the issuer adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds, are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than AAA or its equivalent; or(iv) any additional securities and obligations hereafter authorized by the laws of the State of Texas as eligible for use to accomplish the discharge of obligations such as the Bonds. V. The term Gross Revenues shall mean all revenues,income,and receipts derived or received by the City from the operation and ownership of the System, including the interest income from the investment or deposit of money in any Fund created or confirmed by this Ordinance or maintained by the City in connection with the System, other than those amounts subject to payment to the United States of America as rebate pursuant to section 148 of the Code. W. The term Holder or Holders shall mean the registered owner, whose name appears in the Security Register, for any Bond. X. The term Inferior Lien Obligations shall mean(i) any bonds,notes,warrants,or any similar obligations hereafter issued by the City that are payable wholly or in part from and equally and ratably secured by a lien and pledge of the Net Revenues,which pledge is subordinate and inferior to the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is included in Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,that is or will be pledged to the payment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations,and that is on parity with the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues securing the payment of the then-Outstanding Inferior Lien Obligations and (ii)obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured by such subordinate and inferior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. Y. The term Interest Payment Date shall mean the date semiannual interest is payable on the Bonds, being January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing 20U, while any of the Bonds remain Outstanding. Z. The term Net Revenues shall mean all Gross Revenues less Operating Expenses. AA. The term Operating Expenses shall mean the expenses of operation and maintenance of the System,including all salaries,labor,materials,repairs,and extensions necessary to render efficient service; provided, however, that only such repairs and extensions, as in the judgment of the City, reasonably and 138398800.4 -22- fairly exercised by the passage of appropriate ordinances, are necessary to render adequate service,or such as might be necessary to meet some physical accident or condition which would otherwise impair any Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, Inferior Lien Obligations, or other Debt of the System. Operating Expenses shall include the purchase of water, sewer and gas services as received from other entities and the expenses related thereto and,to the extent permitted by a change in law (and receipt of an opinion as to legality from a firm of nationally recognized bond counsel), Operating Expenses may include payments made on or in respect of obtaining and maintaining any Credit Facility. Operating Expenses shall never include any allowance for depreciation,property retirement,depletion,obsolescence, and other items not requiring an outlay of cash and any interest on the Bonds or any Debt. BB. The term Ordinance shall mean this Ordinance adopted by the City Council on January 30, 2024 authorizing the issuance of the Bonds. CC. The term Outstanding shall mean when used in this Ordinance with respect to all Debt means, as of the date of determination, all Debt except: (1) those Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations canceled by the Paying Agent/Registrar or delivered to the Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation; (2) those Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations for which payment has been duly provided by the City in accordance with the provisions of Section 34 of this Ordinance; and (3) those Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations that have been mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen and replacement Bonds have been registered and delivered in lieu thereof as provided in Section 27 of this Ordinance. DD. The term Paying Agent/Registrar shall mean the financial institution specified in Section 3 of this Ordinance,or its herein-permitted successors and assigns. EE. The term Previously Issued Parity Obligations shall mean, as of the Closing Date the Outstanding and unpaid obligations of the City that are payable solely from and equally and ratably secured by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues of the System that is superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Subordinate Lien Obligations and Inferior Lien Obligations,identified as follows: (1) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2012",dated November 15,2012,in the original principal amount of$69,085,000; (2) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2012",dated November 15,2012,in the original principal amount of$155,660,000; (3) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015",dated July 1,2015,in the original principal amount of$46,990,000; (4) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A",dated March 1,2015,in the original principal amount of$93,600,000; (5) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2015C",dated July 1,2015,in the original principal amount of$101,385,000; 138398800.4 -23- (6) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016",dated August 1,2016,in the original principal amount of$80,415,000; (7) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017',dated March 15,2017,in the original principal amount of$51,215,000; (8) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2017',dated October 1,2017,in the original principal amount of$2,750,000; (9) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue and Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2019",dated September 15, 2019,in the original principal amount of$93,425,000; (10) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2020A", dated July 15, 2020, in the original principal amount of $133,765,000; (11) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Taxable Series 202013", dated July 15, 2020, in the original principal amount of $183,635,000; (12) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, New Series 2020C", dated November 1, 2020, in the original principal amount of $11,425,000; (13) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Notes,Taxable New Series 2021A",dated April 1,2021,in the original principal amount of$35,000,000; (14) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2022A",dated June 15,2022,in the original principal amount of$3,561,000; (15) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 202213",dated July 15,2022,in the original principal amount of$92,465,000; (16) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2023", dated July 20, 2023, in the original principal amount of $138,320,000; and (17) Upon issuance,the Bonds. FF. The term Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations shall mean the "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Subordinate Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2018", dated February 15,2018,in the original principal amount of$34,835,000. GG. The term Pricing Officer shall mean either of the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer,or Director of Finance and Procurement,respectively, of the City (which shall include any person serving in the foregoing capacity on an interim or non-permanent basis). HH. The term Prudent Utility Practice shall mean any of the practices,methods and acts,in the exercise of reasonable judgment,in the light of the facts,including but not limited to the practices,methods and acts engaged in or approved by a significant portion of the public utility industry prior thereto,known 138398800.4 -24- at the time the decision was made,would have been expected to accomplish the desired result at the lowest reasonable cost consistent with reliability, safety and expedition. It is recognized that Prudent Utility Practice is not intended to be limited to the optimum practice,method or act at the exclusion of all others, but rather is a spectrum of possible practices, methods or acts which could have been expected to accomplish the desired result at the lowest reasonable cost consistent with reliability,safety and expedition. In the case of any facility included in the System which is owned in common with one or more other entities, the term "Prudent Utility Practice", as applied to such facility, shall have the meaning set forth in the agreement governing the operation of such facility. II. The term Purchasers shall mean the initial purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds named in Section 28 of this Ordinance. JJ. The term Required Reserve Amount shall have the meaning given such term in Section 14 of this Ordinance. KK. The term Reserve Fund shall have the meaning given such term in Section 14 of this Ordinance. LL. The term Reserve Fund Deposits shall have the meaning given such term in Section 14 of this Ordinance. MM. The term Senior Lien Obligations shall mean(i)the Previously Issued Parity Obligations, (ii) any Additional Senior Lien Obligations, and (iii) obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations, as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. NN. The term Senior Lien Pledged Revenues shall mean (i) the Net Revenues plus (ii) any additional revenues, income, receipts, or other resources including, without limitation, any grants, donations,or income received or to be received from the United States Government,or any other public or private source,whether pursuant to an agreement or otherwise,which hereafter are pledged by the City to the payment of the Bonds, and at the City's discretion, any Additional Senior Lien Obligations, and excluding those revenues excluded from Gross Revenues. 00. The term Special Project shall mean, to the extent permitted by law, any water, sewer, wastewater reuse, or municipal drainage system property, improvement, or facility declared by the City, upon the recommendation of the City Council, not to be part of the System, for which the costs of acquisition, construction, and installation are paid from proceeds of Special Project Bonds (hereinafter defined)being a financing transaction other than the issuance of bonds payable from ad valorem taxes,Net Revenues, or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, and for which all maintenance and operation expenses are payable from sources other than ad valorem taxes, Net Revenues, or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, but only to the extent that and for so long as all or any part of the revenues or proceeds of which are or will be 138398800.4 -25- pledged to secure the payment or repayment of such costs of acquisition, construction, and installation under such Special Project Bonds. PP. The term Stated Maturity shall mean the annual principal payments of the Bonds payable on July 15 of each year, as set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. QQ. The term Subordinate Lien Obligations shall mean (i) the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations, (ii) any Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, and (iii)any obligations issued to refund the foregoing payable and equally and ratably secured from a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof that is included in Senior Lien Pledged Revenues but superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the payment of the Inferior Lien Obligations, as determined by the City Council in accordance with any applicable law. RR. The term System shall mean and include, whether now existing or hereinafter added, the City's existing combined waterworks system,wastewater disposal system and gas system,together with all future extensions,improvements,enlargements, and additions thereto including,to the extent permitted by law (and to be added at the sole discretion of the City), storm sewer and drainage within the waterworks system, solid waste disposal system, additional utility (including electricity), telecommunications, technology,and any other similar enterprise services,and all replacements,additions,and improvements to any of the foregoing, within or without the City limits; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, and to the extent now or hereafter authorized or permitted by law, the term System shall not include any waterworks, wastewater or gas facilities which are declared by the City to be a Special Project and not a part of the System and which are hereafter acquired or constructed by the City with the proceeds from the issuance of Special Project Bonds, which are hereby defined as being special revenue obligations of the City which are not secured by or payable from all or part of the Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, but which are secured by and payable solely from special contract revenues, or payments received from the City or any other legal entity, or any combination thereof, in connection with such facilities; and such revenues or payments shall not be considered as or constitute Gross Revenues of the System,unless and to the extent otherwise provided in the ordinance or ordinances authorizing the issuance of such Special Project Bonds. SS. The term System Fund shall have the meaning given such term in Section 12 of this Ordinance. SECTION 10. Pledge of Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. A. The City hereby covenants and agrees that the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues of the System are hereby irrevocably pledged to the payment and security of the Senior Lien Obligations, including the establishment and maintenance of the special funds or accounts created for the payment and security thereof, all as hereinafter provided; and it is hereby ordained that the Senior Lien Obligations, and the interest thereon,shall constitute a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues and be valid and binding without any physical delivery thereof or further act by the City, and the lien created hereby on the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for the payment and security of the Senior Lien Obligations, shall be,prior in right and claim as to any other indebtedness,liability,or obligation of the City or the System. The Senior Lien Obligations are and will be secured by and payable only from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, and are not secured by or payable from a mortgage or deed of trust on any properties whether real,personal,or mixed,constituting the System. B. Chapter 1208, as amended,Texas Government Code, applies to the issuance of the Bonds and the pledge of Senior Lien Pledged Revenues granted by the City under subsection A of this Section, and such pledge is therefore valid,effective, and perfected. If Texas law is amended at any time while the 138398800.4 -26- Senior Lien Obligations are Outstanding and unpaid such that the pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues granted by the City is to be subject to the filing requirements of Chapter 9, Texas Business & Commerce Code, then in order to preserve to the registered owners of the Senior Lien Obligations the perfection of the security interest in this pledge, the City Council agrees to take such measures as it determines are reasonable and necessary under Texas law to comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 9, as amended, Texas Business & Commerce Code and enable a filing to perfect the security interest in this pledge to occur. SECTION 11. Rates and Charges. For the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds and in addition to all provisions and covenants in the laws of the State of Texas and in this Ordinance, the City hereby expressly stipulates and agrees,while any of the Senior Lien Obligations are Outstanding,to establish and maintain rates and charges for facilities and services afforded by the System that are reasonably expected, on the basis of available information and experience and with due allowance for contingencies,to produce Gross Revenues in each Fiscal Year sufficient: A. To pay all Operating Expenses, or any expenses required by statute to be a first claim on and charge against the Gross Revenues of the System. B. To produce Net Revenues, together with any other lawfully available funds, equal to at least 1.15 times Average Annual Debt Service Requirements on the then-Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations and to deposit the amounts required to be deposited in any reserve or contingency fund or account created for the payment and security of the Senior Lien Obligations, and any other obligations or evidences of indebtedness issued or incurred that are payable from and secured solely by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues, including the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations; C. To produce Net Revenues, together with any other lawfully available funds, sufficient to pay the amounts that may be deposited in the special funds established for the payment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations; D. To produce Net Revenues, together with any other lawfully available funds, sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Inferior Lien Obligations as the same become due and payable and to deposit the amounts required to be deposited in any reserve or contingency fund or account created for the payment and security of the Inferior Lien Obligations, and any other obligations or evidences of indebtedness issued or incurred that are payable from and secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Senior Lien Obligations, and the Subordinate Lien Obligations; and E. To pay, together with any other lawfully available funds, any other legally incurred Debt payable from the Net Revenues of the System and/or secured by a lien on any part of the System. The determination of the amount of principal of and interest on any obligations identified in this Section for the purpose of confirming the sufficiency of System rates and charges shall be made after giving consideration as an offset to debt service the receipt or anticipated receipt of a refundable tax credit or similar payment relating to any series of obligations irrevocably designated as refundable tax credit bonds pursuant to the City ordinance authorizing their issuance or otherwise relating thereto. SECTION 12. System Fund. The City hereby covenants, agrees, and ratifies its prior covenants and agreements that the Gross Revenues of the System shall be deposited, as collected and received,into a separate Fund or account (previously created and established and to be maintained with the Depository) 138398800.4 -27- known as the "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Revenue Fund"(the System Fund)and that the Gross Revenues of the System shall be kept separate and apart from all other funds of the City. All Gross Revenues deposited into the System Fund shall be pledged and appropriated to the extent required for the following uses and in the order of priority shown: A. First: To the payment of all necessary and reasonable Operating Expenses or other expenses required by statute to be a first charge on and claim against the revenues of the System. B. Second: To the payment of the amounts required to be deposited into the special funds and accounts created and established for the payment, security and benefit of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations,the Bonds, and any Additional Senior Lien Obligations hereafter issued by the City. C. Third: To the payment of the amounts required to be deposited into the special funds and accounts created and established for the payment,security and benefit of the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations hereafter issued by the City. D. Fourth: To the payment of the amounts that must be deposited in any special funds and accounts created and established for the payment, security, and benefit of any Inferior Lien Obligations hereafter issued by the City. Any Net Revenues remaining in the System Fund following such transfers may be used by the City for payment of other obligations of the System, and for any other lawful purpose. SECTION 13. Bond Fund - Excess Funds. For purposes of providing funds to pay the principal of and interest on the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations as the same become due and payable, the City agrees to maintain, at the Depository, a separate and special Fund or account to be created and known as the "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds Interest and Sinking Fund" (the Bond Fund). The City covenants that there shall be deposited by an Authorized Official into the Bond Fund prior to each principal and interest payment date from the available Net Revenues an amount equal to one hundred per cent (100%) of the amount required to fully pay the interest on and the principal of the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations then falling due and payable, such deposits to pay maturing principal and accrued interest on the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations to be made in substantially equal monthly installments on or before the IW' day of each month, beginning on or before the 10t1 day of the month next following the delivery of the Bonds to the Purchasers. As described further in Section 15 hereof, if the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues in any month are insufficient to make the required payments into the Bond Fund, then the amount of any deficiency in such payment shall be added to the amount otherwise required to be paid into the Bond Fund in the next month. The required monthly deposits to the Bond Fund for the payment of principal of and interest on the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations shall continue to be made as hereinabove provided until such time as (i)the total amount on deposit in the Bond Fund and Reserve Fund is equal to the amount required to fully pay and discharge all Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations(principal and interest)or(ii)the Senior Lien Obligations are no longer Outstanding. Any proceeds of the Bonds,and investment income thereon,not expended for authorized purposes shall be deposited into the Bond Fund and shall be taken into consideration and reduce the amount of monthly deposits required to be deposited into the Bond Fund from the Net Revenues of the System. 138398800.4 -28- Any surplus proceeds from the sale of the Bonds, including investment income thereon, not expended for authorized purposes shall be deposited in the Bond Fund,and such amounts so deposited shall reduce the sums otherwise required to be deposited in such Fund from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. SECTION 14. Reserve Fund. To accumulate and maintain a reserve for the payment of the Bonds equal to 100% of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements or such lesser amount as restricted by the Code (calculated by the City Council at the beginning of each Fiscal Year and as of the date of issuance of the Bonds and each series of Additional Senior Lien Obligations) for the Bonds (the Required Reserve Amount),the City hereby creates and establishes, and shall maintain at a Depository a separate and special fund known as the "Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds Reserve Fund"(the Reserve Fund). Earnings and income derived from the investment of amounts held for the credit of the Reserve Fund shall be retained in the Reserve Fund until the Reserve Fund contains the Required Reserve Amount; thereafter, such earnings and income shall be deposited to the credit of the System Fund. All funds deposited into the Reserve Fund shall be used solely for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds,when and to the extent other funds available for such purposes are insufficient and,in addition,may be used to retire the last Stated Maturity or Stated Maturities of or interest on the Bonds. The City may acquire a Credit Facility or Facilities issued by a Credit Provider in amounts equal to all or part of the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds in lieu of depositing cash into the Reserve Fund; provided,however, that no such Credit Facility may be so substituted unless the substitution of the Credit Facility will not, in and of itself, cause any ratings then assigned to the Bonds by any nationally recognized rating agency to be lowered and the resolution authorizing the substitution of the Credit Facility for all or part of the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds contains(i)a finding that such substitution is cost effective and(ii)a provision that the interest due on any repayment obligation of the City by reason of payments made under such Credit Facility does not exceed the highest lawful rate of interest which may be paid by the City at the time of the delivery of the Credit Facility. The City reserves the right to use Senior Lien Pledged Revenues to fund the payment of(1)periodic premiums on the Credit Facility as a part of the payment of the City's Operating Expenses,and(2)any repayment obligation incurred by the City(including interest)to the Credit Provider,the payment of which will result in the reinstatement of such Credit Facility, prior to making payments required to be made to the Reserve Fund pursuant to the provisions of this Section to restore the balance in such fund the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds. Until the issuance of any Additional Senior Lien Obligations(or as from time to time recalculated by the City as provided in the first paragraph of this Section),the Required Reserve Amount is$[ 1 (inclusive of the Bonds). Of this amount, $[ representing the increase in the Required Reserve Amount attributable to the issuance of the Bonds, shall be deposited to the Reserve Fund at such time as may be required pursuant to the provisions of this Section from Revenues, paid from the System Fund at such level of priority as specified in Section 12,by the deposit of monthly installments,made on or before the 10t1 day of each month following the month in which such obligation to fund the Reserve Fund arises, of not less than 1/60th of the amount to be maintained in the Reserve Fund. As and when Additional Senior Lien Obligations are delivered or incurred, the Required Reserve Amount shall be increased,if required,to an amount calculated in the manner provided in the first paragraph of this Section. Any additional amount required to be maintained in the Reserve Fund shall be so accumulated by the deposit of all or a portion of the necessary amount from the proceeds of the issue or other lawfully available funds in the Reserve Fund immediately after the delivery of the then proposed Additional Senior Lien Obligations or, at the option of the City, by the deposit of monthly installments, made on or before the business day before the 10th day of each month following the month of delivery of the then proposed Additional Senior Lien Obligations, of not less than 1/60th of the additional amount to be maintained in the Reserve Fund by reason of the issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then 138398800.4 -29- being issued (or 1/60th of the balance of the additional amount not deposited immediately in cash) (such deposits,the Required Reserve Fund Deposits),thereby ensuring the accumulation in the Reserve Fund of the appropriate Required Reserve Amount. When and for so long as the cash and investments in the Reserve Fund equal the Required Reserve Amount,no deposits need be made to the credit of the Reserve Fund;but,if and when the Reserve Fund at any time contains less than the Required Reserve Amount (other than as the result of the issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations as provided in the preceding paragraph),the City covenants and agrees to cure the deficiency in the Required Reserve Amount by resuming the Required Reserve Fund Deposits to the Reserve Fund from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues in monthly deposit amounts equal to not less than 1/60th of the Required Reserve Amount covenanted by the City to be maintained in the Reserve Fund. Any such deficiency payments shall be made on or before the 10t1 day of each month until the Required Reserve Amount has been fully restored. The City further covenants and agrees that, subject only to the prior payments to be made to the Bond Fund, the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues shall be applied and appropriated and used to establish and maintain the Required Reserve Amount and to cure any deficiency in such amounts as required by the terms of this Ordinance and any other ordinance pertaining to the issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations. During such time as the Reserve Fund contains the Required Reserve Amount, the City Council may, at its option, withdraw all surplus funds in the Reserve Fund in excess of the Required Reserve Amount. Any such withdrawn surplus shall be deposited to the Bond Fund or used by the City for any other lawful purpose;provided,however,to the extent that such excess amount represents Bond proceeds, then such amount must be transferred to the Bond Fund or be otherwise used in accordance with then- applicable State law. In the event a Credit Facility issued to satisfy all or a part of the City's obligation with respect to the Reserve Fund causes the amount then on deposit in the Reserve Fund to exceed the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds, the City may transfer such excess amount to any fund or funds established for the payment of or security for the Bonds (including any escrow established for the final payment of any such obligations pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1207,as amended, Texas Government Code),or be used for any lawful purposes; provided, however, to the extent that such excess amount represents Bond proceeds,then such amount must be transferred to the Bond Fund or be otherwise used in accordance with then-applicable State law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section and except for any reserve fund requirements imposed on the City by the TWDB in Section 29 hereof,the requirements set forth above to fund the Reserve Fund in the amount of the Required Reserve Amount shall be suspended for such time as the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for each Fiscal Year are equal to at least 110% of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements. In the event that the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for any two consecutive Fiscal Years are less than 110% (unless such percentage is below 100% in any Fiscal Year, in which case the hereinafter—specified requirements will commence after such Fiscal Year)of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements,the City will be required to commence making the deposits to the Reserve Fund, as provided above, and to continue making such deposits until the earlier of(i)such time as the Reserve Fund contains the Required Reserve Amount or (ii) the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for a Fiscal Year have been equal to not less than 110% of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements. SECTION 15. Deficiencies - Excess Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. A. If on any occasion there shall not be sufficient Senior Lien Pledged Revenues to make the required deposits into the Bond Fund,then such deficiency shall be cured as soon as possible from the next available unallocated Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,or from any other sources available for such purpose, 138398800.4 -30- and such payments shall be in addition to the amounts required to be paid into these Funds or accounts during such month or months. B. Subject to making the required deposits to the Bond Fund when and as required by any ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of the Senior Lien Obligations, the Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Inferior Lien Obligations,the excess Net Revenues of the System may be used by the City for any lawful purpose (as further provided in Section 12 hereof). SECTION 16. Payment of Bonds. While any of the Bonds are Outstanding, an Authorized Official shall cause to be transferred to the Paying Agent/Registrar therefor, from funds on deposit in the Bond Fund, amounts sufficient to fully pay and discharge promptly each installment of interest on and principal of the Bonds as such installment accrues or matures; such transfer of funds must be made in such manner as will cause immediately available funds to be deposited with the Paying Agent/Registrar for the Bonds at the close of the business day next preceding the date a debt service payment is due on the Bonds. SECTION 17. Investments. Funds held in any Fund or account created, established, or maintained pursuant to this Ordinance shall,at the option of the City,be placed in time deposits,certificates of deposit,guaranteed investment contracts or similar contractual agreements as permitted by the provisions of the Public Funds Investment Act, as amended, Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code (collateralized pursuant to the Public Funds Collateral Act, as amended, Chapter 2257, Texas Government Code),or any other law, and secured (to the extent not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) by obligations of the type hereinafter described, including investments held in book-entry form, in securities including,but not limited to, direct obligations of the United States of America, obligations guaranteed or insured by the United States of America,which,in the opinion of the Attorney General of the United States, are backed by its full faith and credit or represent its general obligations,or invested in indirect obligations of the United States of America including,but not limited to,evidences of indebtedness issued,insured,or guaranteed by such governmental agencies as the Federal Land Banks,Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Banks for Cooperatives,Federal Home Loan Banks,Government National Mortgage Association,Farmers Home Administration, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, or Federal Housing Association; provided that all such deposits and investments shall be made in such a manner that the money required to be expended from any Fund or account will be available at the proper time or times. Such investments (except State and Local Government Series investments held in book entry form, which shall at all times be valued at cost)shall be valued in terms of current market value within 45 days of the close of each Fiscal Year. All interest and income derived from deposits and investments in the Bond Fund immediately shall be credited to,and any losses debited to,the Bond Fund. All such investments shall be sold promptly when necessary to prevent any default in connection with the Bonds. SECTION 18. Covenants. It is expressly recognized that prior to the issuance of any Additional Senior Lien Obligations, Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, or Inferior Lien Obligations, that the City must comply with each of the conditions precedent contained in this Ordinance and the City ordinances. A. Performance. It will faithfully perform at all times any and all covenants, undertakings, stipulations, and provisions contained in this Ordinance, and each ordinance authorizing the issuance of Senior Lien Obligations; it will promptly pay or cause to be paid the principal amount of and interest on all Debt, on the dates and in the places and manner prescribed in such ordinances and such Debt; and it will, at the time and in the manner prescribed, deposit or cause to be deposited the amounts required to be deposited into the System Fund and the Funds herein created; and any registered owner of any Debt may require the City, its officials and employees to carry out,respect or enforce the covenants and obligations of this Ordinance, or any ordinance authorizing the issuance of Debt, by all legal and equitable means, 138398800.4 -31- including specifically,but without limitation,the use and filing of mandamus proceedings,in any court of competent jurisdiction, against the City,its officials and employees. B. City's Legal Authority. It is a duly created and existing home rule city of the State of Texas, and is duly authorized under the laws of the State of Texas to issue the Bonds; that all action on its part for the issuance of the Bonds has been duly and effectively taken,and that the Bonds in the hands of the owners thereof are and will be valid and enforceable special obligations of the City in accordance with their terms. C. Acquisition and Construction; Operation and Maintenance. (1)It shall use its best efforts in accordance with Prudent Utility Practice to acquire and construct, or cause to be acquired and constructed, any Capital Additions or Capital Improvements, in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor, as modified from time to time, with due diligence and in a sound and economical manner;and(2)it shall at all times use its best efforts to operate or cause to be operated the System properly and in an efficient manner,consistent with Prudent Utility Practice,and shall use its best efforts to maintain, preserve, reconstruct and keep the same or cause the same to be so maintained, preserved, reconstructed and kept, with the appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof, in good repair, working order and condition, and shall from time to time make, or use its best efforts to cause to be made, all necessary and proper repairs,replacement and renewals so that at all times the operation of the System may be properly and advantageously conducted. D. Title. It has or will obtain lawful title,whether such title is in fee or lesser interest, to the lands,buildings,structures and facilities constituting the System,that it warrants that it will defend the title to all the aforesaid lands, buildings, structures and facilities, and every part thereof, for the benefit of the owners of the Senior Lien Obligations, against the claims and demands of all persons whomsoever, that it is lawfully qualified to pledge the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues to the payment of the Senior Lien Obligations in the manner prescribed herein,and has lawfully exercised such rights. E. Liens. It will from time to time and before the same become delinquent pay and discharge all taxes, assessments and governmental charges, if any, which shall be lawfully imposed upon it, or the System;it will pay all lawful claims for rents,royalties,labor,materials and supplies which if unpaid might by law become a lien or charge thereon,the lien of which would be prior to or interfere with the liens hereof, so that the priority of the liens granted hereunder shall be fully preserved in the manner provided herein, and it will not create or suffer to be created any mechanic's,laborer's,materialman's or other lien or charge which might or could be prior to the liens hereof, or do or suffer any matter or thing whereby the liens hereof might or could be impaired; provided however, that no such tax, assessment or charge, and that no such claims which might be used as the basis of a mechanic's, laborer's, materialman's or other lien or charge, shall be required to be paid so long as the validity of the same shall be contested in good faith by the City. F. No Free Service. No free service or service otherwise than in accordance with the established rate schedule shall be furnished, directly or indirectly, by the System to any person, firm, corporation or other entity,other than the City. No part of the salary of any official or employee of the City or his replacement shall be paid from Senior Lien Pledged Revenues unless and only to the extent the duties and performances of such official or employee or his replacement appertain directly to the System. To the extent the City receives the services of the System, such services shall be accounted for according to the established rate schedule. G. Further Encumbrance. It will not additionally encumber the Net Revenues of the System in any manner, except as permitted in this Ordinance (which provisions are also included in other City ordinances authorizing other series of Senior Lien Obligations). 138398800.4 -32- H. Sale, Lease or Disposal of Property. No part of the System shall be sold, leased, mortgaged,demolished,removed or otherwise disposed of,except as follows: (1) To the extent permitted by law,the City may sell or exchange at any time and from time to time any property or facilities constituting part of the System only if(A)it shall determine such property or facilities are not useful in the operation of the System,or(B)the proceeds of such sale are $250,000 or less, or it shall have received a certificate executed by an Engineer and the City Manager stating, in their opinion, that the fair market value of the property or facilities exchanged is $250,000 or less, or (C) if such proceeds or fair market value exceeds $250,000 it shall have received a certificate executed by an Engineer and the City Manager stating (i) that system within the System of which the property or facilities comprises a part thereof and (ii) in their opinion, that the sale or exchange of such property or facilities will not impair the ability of the City to comply during the current or any future Fiscal Year with the provisions of Subsection K of this Section. The proceeds of any such sale or exchange not used to acquire other property necessary or desirable for the safe or efficient operation of the System shall forthwith,at the option of the City (i) be used to redeem or purchase Debt, or (ii) otherwise be used to provide for the payment of Debt. The foregoing notwithstanding, if such property or facilities sold or exchanged constituted property or facilities comprising all or a part of a system within the System, the acquisition,improvement or extension of such system having not been financed by the City in any manner with the proceeds of Debt, or with the proceeds of obligations which were refunded in whole or in part with the proceeds of Debt, then the City may utilize the proceeds of such sale or exchange for any lawful purpose; and (2) To the extent permitted by law, the City may lease or make contracts or grant licenses for the operation of,or make arrangements for the use of,or grant easements or other rights with respect to,any part of the System,provided that any such lease,contract,license,arrangement, easement or right(A)does not impede the operation by the City of the System and(B)does not in any manner impair or adversely affect the rights or security of the owners of the Debt under this Ordinance; and provided, further,that if the depreciated cost of the property to be covered by any such lease,contract,license,arrangement,easement or other right is in excess of$500,000,the City shall have received a certificate executed by an Engineer and the City Manager that the action of the City with respect thereto does not result in a breach of the conditions under this clause (2).Any payments received by the City under or in connection with any such lease, contract, license, arrangement, easement or right in respect of the System or any part thereof shall constitute Gross Revenues. I. Books, Records and Accounts. It shall keep proper books, records and accounts separate and apart from all other records and accounts, in which complete and correct entries shall be made of all transactions relating to the System and the City shall cause said books and accounts to be audited annually as of the close of each Fiscal Year by the Accountant. J. Insurance. (1) Except as otherwise permitted in clause (2)below,it shall cause to be insured such parts of the System as would usually be insured by corporations operating like properties, with a responsible insurance company or companies, against risks, accidents or casualties against which and to the extent insurance is usually carried by corporations operating like properties including,to the extent reasonably obtainable, fire and extended coverage insurance, insurance against damage by floods, and use and occupancy insurance. Public liability and property damage insurance shall also be carried unless the City Attorney gives a written opinion to the effect that the City is not liable for claims which would be protected by such insurance. At any time while any contractor 138398800.4 -33- engaged in construction work shall be fully responsible therefor, the City shall not be required to carry insurance on the work being constructed if the contractor is required to carry appropriate insurance. All such policies shall be open to the inspection of the bondholders and their representatives at all reasonable times. In no event shall the amount of insurance maintained on the projects financed with the proceeds of the Bonds be less than the amount necessary to protect the Purchaser's interest. (2) In lieu of obtaining policies for insurance as provided above, the City may self- insure against risks, accidents,claims or casualties described in clause (1)above. (3) The annual audit hereinafter required shall contain a section commenting on whether or not the City has complied with the requirements of this Section with respect to the maintenance of insurance, and listing the areas of insurance for which the City is self-insuring, all policies carried, and whether or not all insurance premiums upon the insurance policies to which reference is hereinbefore made have been paid. K. Audits. After the close of each Fiscal Year while any Debt is Outstanding,an audit will be made of the books and accounts relating to the System and the Net Revenues by the Accountant. Such annual audit reports shall be open to the inspection of the registered owners of Debt and their agents and representatives at all reasonable times. L. Governmental Agencies. It will comply with all of the terms and conditions of any and all franchises, permits and authorizations applicable to or necessary with respect to the System, and which have been obtained from any governmental agency; and the City has or will obtain and keep in full force and effect all franchises, permits, authorization and other requirements applicable to or necessary with respect to the acquisition,construction, equipment,operation and maintenance of the System. M. No Competition. To the extent it legally may, it will not grant any franchise or permit for the acquisition, construction or operation of any competing facilities which might be used as a substitute for the System's facilities, and,to the extent that it legally may,the City will prohibit any such competing facilities. N. Rights of Inspection. The Engineer or any registered owner of $100,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Debt then Outstanding shall have the right at all reasonable times to inspect the System and all records,accounts and data of the City relating thereto,and upon request the City shall furnish to an Engineer or such registered owner, as the case may be, such financial statements, reports and other information relating to the City and the System as an Engineer or such registered owner may from time to time reasonably request. SECTION 19. Issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations, Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations. The City hereby expressly reserves the right to hereafter issue bonds, notes, warrants, certificates of obligation, or similar obligations, payable, wholly or in part, as appropriate,from and secured by a pledge of and lien on the Net Revenues of the System with the following priorities, without limitation as to principal amount, but subject to any terms, conditions, or restrictions applicable thereto under existing ordinances,laws,or otherwise: A. Additional Senior Lien Obligations, secured by and payable from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,which includes(primarily)a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is senior and 138398800.4 -34- superior to the lien there on and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Inferior Lien Obligations,upon satisfying each of the following conditions precedent: (1) The City Manager (or other officer of the City then having the responsibility for the financial affairs of the City) shall have executed a certificate stating (i)that the City is not then in default as to any covenant, obligation or agreement contained in any ordinance or other proceeding relating to any obligations of the City payable from and secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues and (ii)that the amounts on deposit in all Funds or Accounts created and established for the payment and security of all Outstanding obligations payable from and secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues are the amounts then required to be deposited therein. Such certificate shall be dated on or before the date of delivery of such Additional Senior Lien Obligations, but such certificate shall not be dated prior to the date an ordinance is passed authorizing the issuance of such Additional Senior Lien Obligations. (2) Conditions Precedent for Issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations- Capital Improvements and for any other Lawful Purpose except for Capital Additions or for Refunding. The City covenants and agrees that Additional Senior Lien Obligations will not be issued for the purpose of financing Capital Improvements, or for any other lawful purpose (except for Capital Additions or for refunding,which are to be issued in accordance with the provisions of Subsection (3)of this Section and Section 20 hereof,respectively)unless and until the conditions precedent in Subsection (1) above have been satisfied and, in addition thereto, the City has secured a certification of the City Manager to the effect that, according to the books and records of the City, the Net Earnings (hereinafter defined) for the preceding Fiscal Year or for 12 consecutive months out of the 15 months immediately preceding the month the ordinance authorizing the Additional Senior Lien Obligations is adopted are at least equal to 1.15 times the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements for all then-Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations after giving effect to the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then proposed. The foregoing notwithstanding, the City covenants and agrees that Additional Senior Lien Obligations may not be issued for the purpose of financing Capital Improvements when other Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations which have been issued for the purpose of financing Capital Additions and for which capitalized interest for such other Senior Lien Obligations has been provided for at least the twelve months subsequent to the date of issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then proposed to be issued, unless the conditions precedent in Subsection(1) above have been satisfied and, in addition thereto,the City has either (1)complied with the relevant conditions in this Subsection as set forth above,or(2)if the relevant conditions of this Subsection (2) as set forth above cannot be satisfied, the City has satisfied the conditions precedent in Subsection(3)(1)and(ii)of this Section(but,for purposes of such clauses, the term Capital Improvements shall be substituted for the term Capital Additions where the term Capital Additions appears therein to the extent necessary to give recognition to the fact that Capital Improvements, rather than Capital Additions, are then to be financed) and has secured a certification of the City Manager to the effect that, according to the books and records of the City, the Net Earnings for the preceding Fiscal Year or for 12 consecutive months out of the 15 months immediately preceding the month the ordinance authorizing the Additional Senior Lien Obligations is adopted are at least equal to 1.15 times the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements for all then-Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations (other than Senior Lien Obligations issued for Capital Additions for which capitalized interest has been provided for at least the twelve months subsequent to the date of issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations proposed to be issued)after giving effect to the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then proposed to be issued. (3) Conditions Precedent for Issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations- Capital Additions: Initial Issue. The City covenants and agrees that Additional Senior Lien Obligations will not be issued for the purpose of financing Capital Additions, unless the same conditions 138398800.4 -35- precedent specified in Subsection (1) above have been satisfied and, in addition thereto,either the relevant conditions precedent specified in Subsection (1) above are satisfied or, in the alternative, the City shall have obtained: (i) from an Engineer a comprehensive engineering report for each Capital Addition to be financed,which report shall(A)contain(1)detailed estimates of the cost of acquiring and constructing the Capital Addition, (2) the estimated date the acquisition and construction of the Capital Addition will be completed and commercially operative, and (3) a detailed analysis of the impact of the Capital Addition on the financial operations of the system for which the Capital Addition is to be integrated and to the System as a whole during the construction thereof and for at least five Fiscal Years after the date the Capital Addition becomes commercially operative,and(B)conclude that(1)the Capital Addition is necessary and will substantially increase the capacity, or is needed to replace existing facilities, to meet current and projected demands for the service or product to be provided thereby,and(2)the estimated cost of providing the service or product from the Capital Addition will be reasonable in comparison with projected costs for furnishing such service or product from other reasonably available sources; and(ii)a certificate of an Engineer to the effect that, based on an engineering report prepared thereby for each Capital Addition, the projected Net Earnings for each of the five Fiscal Years subsequent to the date the Capital Addition becomes commercially operative (as estimated in the engineering report)will be equal to at least 1.15 times the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements for the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations or incurred and all Additional Senior Lien Obligations estimated to be issued, if any, for all Capital Improvements and for all Capital Additions then in progress or then being initiated, during the period from the date the first series of obligations for the Capital Additions is to be delivered through the fifth Fiscal Year subsequent to the date the Capital Addition is estimated to become commercially operative. (4) Completion Issues. Once a Capital Addition has been initiated by meeting the conditions precedent specified in Subsection (3)(1) and (ii) above and the initial Senior Lien Obligations issued therefor are delivered,the City reserves the right to issue Additional Senior Lien Obligations to finance the remaining costs of such Capital Addition in such amounts as may be necessary to complete the acquisition and construction thereof and make the same commercially operative without satisfaction of any condition precedent under Subsection (3)(1) and (ii) or Subsection (1) of this Section but subject to satisfaction of the following conditions precedent: (i)the City makes a forecast (the Forecast) of the operations of the System demonstrating the System's ability to pay all obligations, payable from the Net Revenues of the System to be Outstanding after the issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then being issued for the period (the Forecast Period) of each ensuing Fiscal Year through the fifth Fiscal Year subsequent to the latest estimated date such Capital Addition is expected to be commercially operative; and (ii)an Engineer reviews such Forecast and executes a certificate to the effect that(A) such Forecast is reasonable, and based thereon(and such other factors deemed to be relevant),the Net Revenues of the System will be adequate to pay all the obligations, payable from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues of the System to be Outstanding after the issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then being issued for the Forecast Period and (B)the proceeds from the sale of such Additional Senior Lien Obligations are estimated to be sufficient to complete such acquisition and construction. (5) Computations,Reports. With reference to Senior Lien Obligations anticipated and estimated to be issued or incurred,the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements therefor shall be those reasonably estimated and computed by the City's Director of Finance and Procurement (or other officer of the City then having the primary responsibility for the financial affairs of the City) after giving effect to the receipt or anticipated receipt of a refundable tax credit or similar payment relating to any series of Senior Lien Obligations irrevocably designated as refundable tax credit bonds,which payment shall be treated as an offset to regularly scheduled debt service of the 138398800.4 -36- series of Senior Lien Obligations to which it relates. In the preparation of the engineering report required in Subsection(3)(1) above, an Engineer may rely on other experts or professionals, including those in the employment of the City, provided such engineering report discloses the extent of such reliance and concludes it is reasonable so to rely.In connection with the issuance of Senior Lien Obligations for Capital Additions, the certification of the City Manager and an Engineer,together with the engineering report for the initial issue and the Forecast for a subsequent issue, shall be conclusive evidence and the only evidence required to show compliance with the provisions and requirements and this clause of this Section. (6) Combination Issues. Senior Lien Obligations for Capital Additions may be combined in a single issue with Senior Lien Obligations for Capital Improvements or for any lawful purpose provided the conditions precedent set forth in Subsection(2)through(4)are complied with as the same relate to the appropriate purpose. (7) Definition of Net Earnings. As used in this Section, the term Net Earnings shall mean the Gross Revenues of the System after deducting the Operating Expenses of the System and those items identified in the SECOND level of priority in Section 12 hereof,but not expenditures which,under standard accounting practice, should be charged to capital expenditures. (8) Determination of Net Earnings. In making a determination of Net Earnings for any of the purposes described in this Section, the City Manager may take into consideration a change in the rates and charges for services and facilities afforded by the System that became effective at least 60 days prior to the last day of the period for which Net Earnings are determined and, for purposes of satisfying any of the Net Earnings test described above, make a pro forma determination of the Net Earnings of the System for the period of time covered by the City Manager's certification or opinion based on such change in rates and charges being in effect for the entire period covered by the City Manager's certificate or opinion. B. The City may issue Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Senior Lien Obligations and that is included in the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,respectively, and senior and superior to the lien there on and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Inferior Lien Obligations, on the terms and conditions desired by the City, subject only to the limitations imposed by applicable law and upon satisfying each of the conditions precedent contained in this Ordinance, and the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations. C. The City may issue Inferior Lien Obligations secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Senior Lien Obligations and Subordinate Lien Obligations and that is included in the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, respectively, on the terms and conditions desired by the City, subject only to the limitations imposed by applicable law and upon satisfying each of the conditions precedent contained in the ordinances authorizing the issuance of this Ordinance. SECTION 20. Refunding Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue refunding bonds to refund all or any part of the currently Outstanding Debt,pursuant to any applicable law then available,upon such terms and conditions as the City Council may deem to be in the best interest of the City, and if less than all such currently Outstanding Debt are refunded, the conditions precedent prescribed for the issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations set forth in Section 19 of this Ordinance shall be satisfied and the City Managers' certification required in Section 19 shall give effect to the Debt Service Requirements of the proposed refunding bonds (but shall not give effect to the Debt Service Requirements of the obligations being refunded following their cancellation or provision being made for their payment). 138398800.4 -37- SECTION 21. Issuance of Special Project Bonds. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to deny the City the right and it shall retain the right to issue Special Project Bonds,provided,however,the City will not issue Special Project Bonds unless the City concludes, upon recommendation of the City Council, that (i)the plan for developing the Special Project is consistent with sound planning, (ii)the Special Project would not materially and adversely interfere with the operation of the System, (iii) the Special Project can be economically and efficiently operated and maintained, and (iv)the Special Project can be economically and efficiently utilized by the City to meet combined utility system requirements and the cost of such will be reasonable. SECTION 22. Security of Funds. All money on deposit in the funds or accounts for which this Ordinance makes provision(except any portion thereof as may be at any time properly invested as provided herein)shall be secured in the manner and to the fullest extent required by the laws of Texas for the security of public funds, and money on deposit in such Funds or accounts shall be used only for the purposes permitted by this Ordinance. SECTION 23. Remedies in Event of Default. The Purchasers may exercise all rights and remedies available to it in law or equity, and any provision of the Bonds that restricts or limits the Purchasers' full exercise of these remedies shall be of no force and effect. In addition to all the rights and remedies provided by the laws of the State of Texas, the City covenants and agrees particularly that in the event the City (a)defaults in the payments to be made to the Bond Fund, or(b)defaults in the observance or performance of any other of the covenants, conditions, or obligations set forth in this Ordinance, the Holders of any of the Bonds shall be entitled to seek a writ of mandamus issued by a court of proper jurisdiction compelling and requiring the governing body of the City and other officers of the City to observe and perform any covenant, condition, or obligation prescribed in this Ordinance. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such default or acquiescence therein, and every such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. The specific remedy herein provided shall be cumulative of all other existing remedies and the specification of such remedy shall not be deemed to be exclusive. SECTION 24. Notices to Holders Waiver. Wherever this Ordinance provides for notice to Holders of any event, such notice shall be sufficiently given (unless otherwise herein expressly provided) if in writing and sent by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the address of each Holder as it appears in the Security Register. In any case where notice to Holders is given by mail,neither the failure to mail such notice to any particular Holders,nor any defect in any notice so mailed, shall affect the sufficiency of such notice with respect to all other Holders. Where this Ordinance provides for notice in any manner, such notice may be waived in writing by the Holder entitled to receive such notice,either before or after the event with respect to which such notice is given, and such waiver shall be the equivalent of such notice. Waivers of notice by Holders shall be filed with the Paying Agent/Registrar,but such filing shall not be a condition precedent to the validity of any action taken in reliance upon such waiver. SECTION 25. Bonds Are Negotiable Instruments. Each of the Bonds authorized herein shall be deemed and construed to be a "security" and as such a negotiable instrument with the meaning of the Chapter 8 of the Texas Uniform Commercial Code. SECTION 26. Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered for payment,transfer,redemption,exchange, or replacement, if surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar, shall be promptly canceled by it and, if 138398800.4 -38- surrendered to the City, shall be delivered to the Paying Agent/Registrar and,if not already canceled, shall be promptly canceled by the Paying Agent/Registrar. The City may at any time deliver to the Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation any Bonds previously certified or registered and delivered which the City may have acquired in any manner whatsoever, and all Bonds so delivered shall be promptly canceled by the Paying Agent/Registrar. All canceled Bonds held by the Paying Agent/Registrar shall be destroyed as directed by the City. SECTION 27. Mutilated, Destroyed. Lost, and Stolen Bonds. If (i) any mutilated Bond is surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar,or the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar receive evidence to their satisfaction of the destruction,loss,or theft of any Bond, and(ii)there is delivered to the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar such security or indemnity as may be required to save each of them harmless,then, in the absence of notice to the City or the Paying Agent/Registrar that such Bond has been acquired by a bona fide purchaser, the City shall execute and,upon its request,the Paying Agent/Registrar shall register and deliver, in exchange for or in lieu of any such mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond, a new Bond of the same Stated Maturity and interest rate and of like tenor and principal amount,bearing a number not contemporaneously Outstanding. In case any such mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond has become or is about to become due and payable,the City in its discretion may,instead of issuing a new Bond,pay such Bond. Upon the issuance of any new Bond or payment in lieu thereof, under this Section, the City may require payment by the Holder of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge imposed in relation thereto and any other expenses(including attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of the Paying Agent/Registrar)connected therewith. Every new Bond issued pursuant to this Section in lieu of any mutilated,destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond shall constitute a replacement of the prior obligation of the City, whether or not the mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond shall be at any time enforceable by anyone, and shall be entitled to all the benefits of this Ordinance equally and ratably with all other Outstanding Bonds. The provisions of this Section are exclusive and shall preclude (to the extent lawful)all other rights and remedies with respect to the replacement and payment of mutilated,destroyed,lost,or stolen Bonds. SECTION 28. Confirmation of Sale, Approval of Private Placement Memorandum. The sale of the Bonds to the Texas Water Development Board(the Purchaser)for the purchase price of$[ , which represents a purchase price of par, less the Purchaser's origination fee of$ and no accrued interest,pursuant to a loan commitment received from the Purchaser,is hereby confirmed. The pricing and terms of the Bonds are hereby found and determined to be the most advantageous reasonably obtained from the City. Delivery of the Bonds shall be made to the Purchaser as soon as practicable after the adoption of this Ordinance, upon payment therefor by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser, in accordance with the terms of sale. Furthermore, the City hereby approves in all respects the City's Private Placement Memorandum prepared in conjunction with the sale of the Bonds and to be delivered to the Purchaser on the Closing Date. The Mayor and/or City Secretary are further authorized and directed to manually execute and deliver for and on behalf of the City copies of the Private Placement Memorandum in final form as may be required by the Purchaser, and such final Private Placement Memorandum in the form and content manually executed by said officials shall be deemed to be approved by the City Council and constitute the Private Placement Memorandum authorized for deliver to the Purchaser. SECTION 29. Compliance with Purchaser's Rules and Regulations. The City will comply with all of the requirements contained in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Purchaser with respect to 138398800.4 -39- the issuance of the Bonds. In addition, in compliance with the Purchaser's State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Program Rules, the City agrees and covenants so long as the Purchaser is the sole Holder of the Bonds: A. to keep and maintain full and complete records and accounts pertaining to the construction of the project refinanced with the proceeds of sale of the Bonds,including the Escrow Fund(defined herein), in accordance with the standards set forth by the Government Accounting Standard Board; B. to create and establish at the Depository a "City of Corpus Christi, Texas State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund for the receipt and disbursement of all proceeds from the sale of the Bonds and all other funds acquired by the City in connection with the planning and construction of the projects financed,in whole or in part,by the Purchaser pursuant to the loan evidenced by the Bonds and all funds deposited to the credit of the Construction Fund shall be disbursed only for the payment of costs and expenses incurred in connection with the planning and building of such projects as approved by the Purchaser and as otherwise allowed by the rules; C. to provide the Purchaser with copies of"as built plans"pertaining to the projects financed, in whole or in part,with any funds of the Purchaser; D. upon completion of the construction of the projects financed, in whole or in part, by the loan evidenced by the Bonds,to provide a final accounting to the Purchaser of the total costs of the projects. In determining the amount of available funds for building the project, the City agrees to account for all amounts deposited to the credit of the Construction Fund, including all loan funds extended by the Purchaser, all other funds available from the projects as described in the project engineer's or fiscal representative's sufficiency of funds statement and all interest earned by the City on money in the Construction Fund. Amounts determined to represent excess or unneeded Bond proceeds shall,at the City's option and upon receipt of prior approval of the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser, be (i) used to redeem Bonds in accordance with Section 4.13 hereof, (ii) deposited to the Bond Fund for the purpose of paying scheduled debt service on the Bonds, or(iii)used to pay eligible costs of the project for which the Bonds were issued, as first approved by the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser; E. in addition to the requirements contained in Section 18.I hereof, to maintain current, accurate,and complete records and accounts necessary to demonstrate compliance with financial assistance related legal and contractual provisions; F. to comply with any special conditions specified by the Purchaser's water conservation plan as specified in 31 TAC 363.42(a)(2)(F)until all financial obligations to the Purchaser have been discharged; G. to abide by the Purchaser's rules and relevant state statutes now or hereafter existing, including,but not limited to,the Purchasers' pre-design funding procedures; H. to not use Bond proceeds to pay for the cost of sampling,testing,removing or disposing of contaminated soils and/or media at the project site; I. to report to the Purchasers the amounts of project funds, if any, that were used to compensate historically underutilized businesses that worked on the project,in accordance with 31 TAC § 363.1312; J. to notify the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser prior to taking any actions to alter the legal status of the City Council in any manner(such as a sale-transfer-merger with another retail public 138398800.4 -40- utility that results in a change in governance of the System) and to receive approval from the Purchaser of any action to convey the City's obligations to the Purchaser, as the Holder of the Bonds,to another entity; K. to the extent permitted by law,to indemnify,hold harmless,and protect the Purchaser from any and all claims, causes of action, or damages to the person or property of third parties arising from the sampling, analysis, transport, storage, treatment and disposition of any contaminated sewage sludge, contaminated sediments and/or contaminated media that may be generated by the City, its contractors, consultants, agents,officials, and employees as a result of activities relating to the project refinanced with proceeds of the Bonds to the extent permitted by law; L. to comply, and take steps to assure that its contractors and sub-contractors shall comply with the Davis Bacon Act(being Subchapter IV of Chapter 31 of Title 40 of the United States Code), and the United Stated Department of Labor's implementing regulations therefor, with respect to projects financed with proceeds of the Bonds; M. to submit outlay reports with sufficient documentation on costs on a quarterly or monthly basis in accordance with the Purchaser's outlay report guidelines; N. to provide the Purchaser with all information required to be reported in accordance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109-282, and the City shall obtain a Data Universal Numbering System Number, register with the System for Award Management (SAM), and maintain current registration at all times while the Bonds remain Outstanding; O. to timely and expeditiously use all loan proceeds as required by federal statutes and EPA regulations,and in adherence to the project schedule approved by the Purchaser's Executive Administrator (which shall not be altered except for good cause shown and only with the written approval of the Purchaser's Executive Administrator); P. to not use any portion of the Bond proceeds,directly or indirectly,to acquire or to replace funds which were used,directly or indirectly,to acquire Nonpurpose Investments(as defined in Section 32 hereof) which produce a yield materially higher than the yield on the Purchaser's bonds that are used to provide the Purchaser with proceeds that it will use to purchase the Bonds(the Source Series Bonds),other than Nonpurpose Investments acquired with: (1) Proceeds of the Source Series Bonds invested for a reasonable temporary period of up to three (3)years(reduced by the period of investment by the Purchaser)until such proceeds are needed for the facilities to be financed; (2) Amounts invested in a bona fide debt service fund,within the meaning of§1.148- I(b)of the Regulations(as defined in Section 32 hereof); and (3) Amounts deposited in any reasonably required reserve or replacement fund to the extent such amounts do not exceed the least of maximum annual debt service on the Bonds, 125% of average annual debt service on the Bonds,or 10%of the stated principal amount(or,in the case of a discount,the issue price)of the Bonds; 138398800.4 -41- Q. to not acquire any of the Source Series Bonds in an amount related to the amount of the Bonds; R. to provide documentation that the all applicable State procurement requirements, as well as all federal procurement requirements,under the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises program are met; S. to provide a schedule prepared by an Engineer,specifying the useful life of the components of the project refinanced with Bond proceeds; T. the City will comply with the conditions included in the Purchaser's environmental finding, when issued; U. any proceeds from the Bonds that are determined to be surplus proceeds remaining after completion of the project financed with the Bond proceeds and completion of a final accounting in a manner approved by the Executive Administrator; V. that the City shall abide by all applicable construction contract requirements related to the use of iron and steel products produced in the United States, as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 2252, Subchapter G and Texas Water Code § 17.183; W. the City will provide for the accumulation of a reserve fund of no less than average annual debt service requirements, to be accumulated in equal monthly installments over the initial sixty (60) months following the issuance of the Bonds.The average annual debt service requirements on the Bonds is $[ 1 and such amount shall be so accumulated into the Reserve Fund by the deposit of monthly installments,made on or before the 20th day of each month following the month of delivery of the Bonds, of not less than 1/60th of the average annual debt service requirements on the Bonds; X. the City will refrain from using the proceeds of the Bonds to pay debt service on another issue of obligations of the borrower in contravention of section 149(d)of the Code; and Y. the Bonds shall be governed by the additional debt test and reserve requirement as provided in the currently outstanding "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2017"held by the Purchaser. SECTION 30. Application of Bond Proceeds. All proceeds from the sale of the Bonds shall be appropriated and,promptly upon receipt by the City,be applied as follows: A. An amount identified in instructions from any Authorized Official shall be deposited in the Construction Fund for the payment of certain costs of issuance relating to the Bonds and certain other costs relating to the improvement of the System and such amount may be deposited in the Escrow Agreement authorized by the provisions of Section 31 hereof. B. The amount identified in Section 14, if any, shall be deposited to the Reserve Fund to satisfy the increase in the Required Reserve Amount attributable to the issuance of the Bonds. Any proceeds of the Bonds remaining after making all such deposits and payments shall be deposited into the Bond Fund. SECTION 31. Authorization of Escrow Agreement. To the extent the hereinafter-described Escrow Agreement is required to comply with the Purchaser's requirements, the City Council of the City hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the execution of an Escrow 138398800.4 -42- Agreement to comply with the Purchaser's pre-design funding option rules and regulations. A copy of the Escrow Agreement is attached hereto, in substantially final form, as Exhibit B, and is incorporated by reference to the provisions of this Ordinance. Any Authorized Official,or his or her designee is authorized to execute the Escrow Agreement as the act and deed of the City Council. SECTION 32. Covenants to Maintain Tax—Exempt Status. A. Definitions. When used in this Section,the following terms have the following meanings: Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by all legislation, if any, effective on or before the Closing Date. Computation Date has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-1(b)of the Regulations. Gross Proceeds means any proceeds as defined in Section 1.148-1(b) of the Regulations, and any replacement proceeds as defined in Section 1.148-1(c)of the Regulations,of the Bonds. Investment has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-1(b)of the Regulations. Nonpurpose Investment means any investment property,as defined in section 148(b)of the Code, in which Gross Proceeds of the Bonds are invested and which is not acquired to carry out the governmental purposes of the Bonds. Rebate Amount has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-1(b)of the Regulations. Regulations means any proposed, temporary, or final Income Tax Regulations issued pursuant to sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code, and 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, which are applicable to the Bonds. Any reference to any specific Regulation shall also mean, as appropriate, any proposed, temporary or final Income Tax Regulation designed to supplement, amend or replace the specific Regulation referenced. Yield of (1) any Investment has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations; and (2) the Bonds means the yield on the Bonds,calculated in the manner set forth in Section 1.148-4 of the Regulations. B. Not to Cause Interest to Become Taxable. The City shall not use,permit the use of,or omit to use Gross Proceeds or any other amounts (or any property the acquisition, construction or improvement of which is to be financed directly or indirectly with Gross Proceeds)in a manner which if made or omitted, respectively,would cause the interest on any Bond to become includable in the gross income, as defined in section 61 of the Code, of the owner thereof for federal income tax purposes. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, unless and until the City receives a written opinion of counsel nationally recognized in the field of municipal bond law to the effect that failure to comply with such covenant will 138398800.4 -43- not adversely affect the exemption from federal income tax of the interest on any Bond, the City shall comply with each of the specific covenants in this Section. C. No Private Use or Private Payments. Except to the extent it will not cause the Bonds to become "private activity bonds" within the meaning of section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall at all times prior to the last Stated Maturity of Bonds: (1) exclusively own, operate and possess all property the acquisition, construction or improvement of which is to be financed or refinanced directly or indirectly with Gross Proceeds of the Bonds, and not use or permit the use of such Gross Proceeds (including all contractual arrangements with terms different than those applicable to the general public) or any property acquired, constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds in any activity carried on by any person or entity(including the United States or any agency,department and instrumentality thereof) other than a state or local government,unless such use is solely as a member of the general public; and (2) not directly or indirectly impose or accept any charge or other payment by any person or entity who is treated as using Gross Proceeds of the Bonds or any property the acquisition, construction or improvement of which is to be financed or refinanced directly or indirectly with such Gross Proceeds, other than taxes of general application within the City or interest earned on investments acquired with such Gross Proceeds pending application for their intended purposes. D. No Private Loan. Except to the extent it will not cause the Bonds to become "private activity bonds"within the meaning of section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder, the City shall not use Gross Proceeds of the Bonds, to make or finance loans to any person or entity other than a state or local government. For purposes of the foregoing covenant, such Gross Proceeds are considered to be"loaned"to a person or entity if. (1)property acquired,constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds is sold or leased to such person or entity in a transaction which creates a debt for federal income tax purposes; (2) capacity in or service from such property is committed to such person or entity under a take-or-pay, output or similar contract or arrangement; or (3) indirect benefits, or burdens and benefits of ownership,of such Gross Proceeds or any property acquired,constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds are otherwise transferred in a transaction which is the economic equivalent of a loan. E. Not to Invest at Higher Yield. Except to the extent it will not cause the Bonds to become "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall not at any time prior to the final Stated Maturity of the Bonds directly or indirectly invest Gross Proceeds in any Investment, if as a result of such investment the Yield of any Investment acquired with Gross Proceeds, whether then held or previously disposed of, materially exceeds the Yield of the Bonds. F. Not Federally Guaranteed. Except to the extent permitted by section 149(b) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall not take or omit to take any action which would 138398800.4 -44- cause the Bonds to be federally guaranteed within the meaning of section 149(b) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. G. Information Report. The City shall timely file the information required by section 149(e) of the Code with the Secretary of the Treasury on Form 8038-G or such other form and in such place as the Secretary may prescribe. H. Rebate of Arbitrage Profits. Except to the extent otherwise provided in section 148(f) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder: (1) The City shall account for all Gross Proceeds(including all receipts,expenditures and investments thereof) on its books of account separately and apart from all other funds (and receipts,expenditures and investments thereof)and shall retain all records of accounting for at least six years after the day on which the last Outstanding Bond is discharged. However, to the extent permitted by law, the City may commingle Gross Proceeds of the Bonds with other money of the City,provided that the City separately accounts for each receipt and expenditure of Gross Proceeds and the obligations acquired therewith. (2) Not less frequently than each Computation Date,the City shall calculate the Rebate Amount in accordance with rules set forth in section 148(f) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. The City shall maintain such calculations with its official transcript of proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds until six years after the final Computation Date. (3) As additional consideration for the purchase of the Bonds by the Purchasers and the loan of the money represented thereby and in order to induce such purchase by measures designed to insure the excludability of the interest thereon from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes, the City shall pay to the United States out of the Bond Fund or its general fund, as permitted by applicable Texas statute, regulation or opinion of the Attorney General of the State of Texas,the amount that when added to the future value of previous rebate payments made for the Bonds equals (i)in the case of a Final Computation Date as defined in Section 1.148-3(e)(2)of the Regulations,one hundred percent(100%)of the Rebate Amount on such date; and (ii) in the case of any other Computation Date,ninety percent(90%) of the Rebate Amount on such date. In all cases, the rebate payments shall be made at the times, in the installments,to the place and in the manner as is or may be required by section 148(f)of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder, and shall be accompanied by Form 8038-T or such other forms and information as is or may be required by section 148(f) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. (4) The City shall exercise reasonable diligence to assure that no errors are made in the calculations and payments required by paragraphs (2) and (3), and if an error is made, to discover and promptly correct such error within a reasonable amount of time thereafter(and in all events within one hundred eighty(180)days after discovery of the error),including payment to the United States of any additional Rebate Amount owed to it, interest thereon, and any penalty imposed under Section 1.148-3(h)of the Regulations. I. Not to Divert Arbitrage Profits. Except to the extent permitted by section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall not, at any time prior to the earlier of the Stated Maturity or final payment of the Bonds, enter into any transaction that reduces the amount required to be paid to the United States pursuant to Subsection H of this Section because such transaction results in a 138398800.4 -45- smaller profit or a larger loss than would have resulted if the transaction had been at arm's length and had the Yield of the Bonds not been relevant to either parry. J. Bonds Not Hedge Bonds. (1) The City reasonably expects to spend at least 85% of the spendable proceeds of such bonds within three years after the bonds are issued. (2) Not more than 50% of the proceeds of the Bonds will be invested in Nonpurpose Investments having a substantially guaranteed Yield for a period of four(4)years or more. K. Elections. The City hereby directs and authorizes the Authorized Official to make elections permitted or required pursuant to the provisions of the Code or the Regulations, as they deem necessary or appropriate in connection with the Bonds,in the Certificate as to Tax Exemption or similar or other appropriate certificate,form or document. Such elections shall be deemed to be made on the Closing Date. SECTION 33. Control and Custody of Bonds. The Mayor shall be and is hereby authorized to take and have charge of all necessary orders and records pending investigation by the Attorney General of the State of Texas and shall take and have charge and control of the Bonds pending their approval by the Attorney General of the State of Texas, the registration thereof by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas and the delivery of the Bonds to the Purchasers. Furthermore, each Authorized Official is hereby authorized and directed to furnish and execute such documents relating to the City and its financial affairs as may be necessary for the issuance of the Bonds,the approval of the Attorney General and their registration by the Comptroller of Public Accounts and, together with the City's Bond Counsel and the Paying Agent/Registrar, make the necessary arrangements for the delivery of the Initial Bond to the Purchasers. SECTION 34. Satisfaction of Obligation of Citv_.If the City shall pay or cause to be paid,or there shall otherwise be paid to the Holders, the principal of,premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, at the times and in the manner stipulated in this Ordinance, then the lien on and pledge of Senior Lien Pledged Revenues made under this Ordinance and all covenants, agreements, and other obligations of the City to the Holders shall thereupon cease,terminate, and be discharged and satisfied. The Bonds, or any principal amount(s) thereof, shall be deemed to have been paid within the meaning and with the effect expressed above in this Section when: (i)money sufficient to pay in full such Bonds or the principal amount(s) thereof at Stated Maturity or to the redemption date therefor, together with all interest due thereon, shall have been irrevocably deposited with and held in trust by the Paying Agent/Registrar, or an authorized escrow agent; and/or (ii) Government Securities shall have been irrevocably deposited in trust with the Paying Agent/Registrar, or an authorized escrow agent, which Government Securities mature as to principal and interest in such amounts and at such times as will insure the availability,without reinvestment, of sufficient money, together with any money deposited therewith, if any,to pay when due the principal of and interest on such Bonds, or the principal amount(s)thereof,on and prior to the Stated Maturity thereof or (if notice of redemption has been duly given or waived or if irrevocable arrangements therefor acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar have been made) the redemption date thereof. In the event of a defeasance of the Bonds,the City shall deliver a certificate from its financial advisor,the Paying Agent/Registrar,an independent accounting firm,or another qualified third party concerning the deposit of cash and/or Government Securities to pay, when due, the principal of, redemption premium (if any), and interest due on any defeased Bonds. To the extent applicable, if at all, the City covenants that no deposit of money or Government Securities will be made under this Section and 138398800.4 -46- no use made of any such deposit which would cause the Bonds to be treated as arbitrage bonds within the meaning of section 148 of the Code (as defined in Section 32 hereof). Any money so deposited with the Paying Agent/Registrar, and all income from Government Securities held in trust by the Paying Agent/Registrar, or an authorized escrow agent, pursuant to this Section which is not required for the payment of the Bonds,or any principal amount(s)thereof,or interest thereon with respect to which such money has been so deposited shall be remitted to the City or deposited as directed by the City. Furthermore, any money held by the Paying Agent/Registrar for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and remaining unclaimed for a period of three (3)years after the Stated Maturity,or applicable redemption date,of the Bonds such money was deposited and is held in trust to pay shall upon the request of the City be remitted to the City against a written receipt therefor,subject to the unclaimed property laws of the State of Texas. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, it is hereby provided that any determination not to redeem defeased Bonds that is made in conjunction with the payment arrangements specified in subsection (i) or (ii) above shall not be irrevocable, provided that: (1) in the proceedings providing for such defeasance, the City expressly reserves the right to call the defeased Bonds for redemption;(2)gives notice of the reservation of that right to the owners of the defeased Bonds immediately following the defeasance; (3) directs that notice of the reservation be included in any redemption notices that it authorizes; and (4) at the time of the redemption, satisfies the conditions of(i) or (ii) above with respect to such defeased debt as though it was being defeased at the time of the exercise of the option to redeem the defeased Bonds, after taking the redemption into account in determining the sufficiency of the provisions made for the payment of the defeased Bonds. SECTION 35. Ordinance a Contract, Amendments- Outstanding Bonds.The City acknowledges that the covenants and obligations of the City herein contained are a material inducement to the purchase of the Bonds. This Ordinance shall constitute a contract with the Holders from time to time,binding on the City and its successors and assigns,and it shall not be amended or repealed by the City so long as any Bond remains Outstanding except as permitted in this Section. The City may,without the consent of or notice to any Holders,from time to time and at any time,amend this Ordinance in any manner not detrimental to the interests of the Holders,including the curing of any ambiguity,inconsistency,or formal defect or omission herein. In addition, the City may, with the written consent of Holders holding a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding affected thereby, amend, add to, or rescind any of the provisions of this Ordinance; provided that, without the consent of all Holders of Outstanding Bonds, no such amendment, addition, or rescission shall (1)extend the time or times of payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds,reduce the principal amount thereof,the redemption price therefor,or the rate of interest thereon, or in any other way modify the terms of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, (2)give any preference to any Bond over any other Bond, or (3)reduce the aggregate principal amount of Bonds required for consent to any such amendment, addition,or rescission. SECTION 36. Printed Opinion. The Purchasers' obligation to accept delivery of the Bonds is subject to their being furnished a final opinion of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, as Bond Counsel, approving certain legal matters as to the Bonds, said opinion to be dated and delivered as of the date of initial delivery and payment for such Bonds. Printing of a true and correct copy of said opinion on the reverse side of each of said Bonds, with appropriate certificate pertaining thereto executed by facsimile signature of the City's Secretary is hereby approved and authorized. SECTION 37. CUSIP Numbers. CUSIP numbers may be printed or typed on the definitive Bonds. It is expressly provided,however,that the presence or absence of CUSIP numbers on the definitive Bonds shall be of no significance or effect as regards the legality thereof,and neither the City nor attorneys 138398800.4 -47- approving said Bonds as to legality are to be held responsible for CUSIP numbers incorrectly printed or typed on the definitive Bonds. SECTION 38. Effect of Headings. The Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof. SECTION 39. Benefits of Ordinance. Nothing in this Ordinance, expressed or implied, is intended or shall be construed to confer upon any person other than the City, Bond Counsel, Paying Agent/Registrar,and the Holders,any right,remedy,or claim,legal or equitable,under or by reason of this Ordinance or any provision hereof,this Ordinance and all its provisions being intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City, Bond Counsel, Financial Advisors,the Paying Agent/Registrar, and the Holders. SECTION 40. Inconsistent Provisions. All resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 41. Governing Law. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 42. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 43. Incorporation of Preamble Recitals. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. SECTION 44. Authorization of Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement. The City Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the execution of a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement concerning the payment, exchange, and transferability of the Bonds. A copy of the Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement is attached hereto, in substantially final form, as Exhibit A and is incorporated by reference to the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 45. Public Meeting. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time,place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting,including this Ordinance,was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended,Texas Government Code. SECTION 46. Continuing Disclosure of Information. A. Definitions. As used in this Section, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to such terms below: EMMA means the MSRB's Electronic Municipal Market Access system, accessible by the general public, without charge, on the internet through the uniform resource locator (URL) http://www.emma.msrb.org. 138398800.4 -48- Financial Obligation means a (a) debt obligation; (b) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or(c)guarantee of a debt obligation or any such derivative instrument;provided that"financial obligation" shall not include municipal securities (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as to which a final official statement(as defined in the Rule)has been provided to the MSRB consistent with the Rule. MSRB means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Rule means SEC Rule 15c2-12, as amended from time to time. SEC means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Undertaking means the City's continuing disclosure undertaking, described in subsections B through F below,hereunder accepted and entered into by the City for the purpose of compliance with the Rule. B. Annual Reports. The City shall file annually with the MSRB, (1)within six months after the end of each Fiscal Year of the City ending in or after 20[23], financial information and operating data with respect to the System of the general type described in Exhibit C hereto, and(2)if not provided as part such financial information and operating data, audited financial statements of the City, when and if available. Any financial statements so to be provided shall be (i) prepared in accordance with the accounting principles described in Exhibit C hereto,or such other accounting principles as the City may be required to employ from time to time pursuant to state law or regulation, and (ii) audited, if the City commissions an audit of such financial statements and the audit is completed within the period during which they must be provided. If the audit of such financial statements is not complete within such period, then the City shall file unaudited financial statements within such period and audited financial statements for the applicable Fiscal Year to the MSRB,when and if the audit report on such statements becomes available. If the City changes its Fiscal Year, it will file notice thereof with the MSRB of the change (and of the date of the new Fiscal Year end)prior to the next date by which the City otherwise would be required to provide financial information and operating data pursuant to this Section. C. Notice of Certain Events. The City shall file notice of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds to the MSRB in a timely manner and not more than 10 business days after occurrence of the event: (1) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) Non-payment related defaults,if material; (3) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (4) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (5) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers,or their failure to perform; (6) Adverse tax opinions,the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB), or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; 138398800.4 -49- (7) Modifications to rights of Holders of the Bonds,if material; (8) Bond calls,if material, and tender offers; (9) Defeasances; (10) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; (11) Rating changes; (12) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, or similar event of the City, which shall occur as described below; (13) The consummation of a merger,consolidation,or acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into of a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions,other than pursuant to its terms,if material; (14) Appointment of a successor or additional Paying Agent/Registrar or the change of name of a Paying Agent/Registrar,if material; (15) Incurrence of a Financial Obligation of the City, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which affect security holders,if material; and (16) Default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which reflect financial difficulties. For these purposes, (a) any event described in the immediately preceding paragraph (12) is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver,fiscal agent,or similar officer for the City in a proceeding under the United States Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement, or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City, and (b) the City intends the words used in the immediately preceding paragraphs (15) and (16) and the definition of Financial Obligation in this Section to have the same meanings as when they are used in the Rule,as evidenced by SEC Release No. 34-83885, dated August 20,2018. The City shall file notice with the MSRB,in a timely manner,of any failure by the City to provide financial information or operating data in accordance with this Section by the time required by this Section. D. Limitations, Disclaimers, and Amendments. The City shall be obligated to observe and perform the covenants specified in this Section for so long as,but only for so long as,the City remains an 138398800.4 -50- "obligated person" with respect to the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule, except that the City in any event will give notice of any deposit that causes the Bonds to be no longer Outstanding. The provisions of this Section are for the sole benefit of the Holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds,and nothing in this Section,express or implied,shall give any benefit or any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim hereunder to any other person. The City undertakes to provide only the financial information, operating data, financial statements, and notices which it has expressly agreed to provide pursuant to this Section and does not hereby undertake to provide any other information that may be relevant or material to a complete presentation of the City's financial results, condition, or prospects or hereby undertake to update any information provided in accordance with this Section or otherwise, except as expressly provided herein. The City does not make any representation or warranty concerning such information or its usefulness to a decision to invest in or sell Bonds at any future date. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE CITY BE LIABLE TO THE HOLDER OR BENEFICIAL OWNER OF ANY BOND OR ANY OTHER PERSON,IN CONTRACT OR TORT,FOR DAMAGES RESULTING IN WHOLE OR IN PART FROM ANY BREACH BY THE CITY,WHETHER NEGLIGENT OR WITH OR WITHOUT FAULT ON ITS PART,OF ANY COVENANT SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION,BUT EVERY RIGHT AND REMEDY OF ANY SUCH PERSON,IN CONTRACT OR TORT, FOR OR ON ACCOUNT OF ANY SUCH BREACH SHALL BE LIMITED TO AN ACTION FOR MANDAMUS OR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. No default by the City in observing or performing its obligations under this Section shall constitute a breach of or default under this Ordinance for purposes of any other provision of this Ordinance. Nothing in this Section is intended or shall act to disclaim,waive, or otherwise limit the duties of the City under federal and state securities laws. The provisions of this Section may be amended by the City from time to time to adapt to changed circumstances that arise from a change in legal requirements, a change in law, or a change in the identity, nature,status,or type of operations of the City,but only if(1)the provisions of this Section,as so amended, would have permitted an underwriter to purchase or sell Bonds in the primary offering of the Bonds in compliance with the Rule,taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule to the date of such amendment, as well as such changed circumstances, and (2)either (a)the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount (or any greater amount required by any other provision of this Ordinance that authorizes such an amendment) of the Outstanding Bonds consent to such amendment or(b) a person that is unaffiliated with the City(such as nationally recognized bond counsel)determines that such amendment will not materially impair the interests of the Holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds. The City may also repeal or amend the provisions of this Section if the SEC amends or repeals the applicable provisions of the Rule or any court of final jurisdiction enters judgment that such provisions of the Rule are invalid, and the City also may amend the provisions of this Section in its discretion in any other manner or circumstance,but in either case only if and to the extent that the provisions of this sentence would not have prevented an underwriter from lawfully purchasing or selling Bonds in the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to (a) such provisions as so amended and (b) any amendments or interpretations of the Rule. If the City so amends the provisions of this Section, the City shall include with any amended financial information or operating data next provided in accordance with this Section an explanation, in narrative form,of the reasons for the amendment and of the impact of any change in the type of financial information or operating data so provided. E. Information Format —Incorporation by Reference. The City information required under this Section shall be filed with the MSRB through EMMA in such format and accompanied by such identifying information as may be specified from time to time thereby. Under the current rules of the MSRB, continuing disclosure documents submitted to EMMA must be in word-searchable portable 138398800.4 -51- document format (PDF) files that permit the document to be saved, viewed,printed, and retransmitted by electronic means and the series of obligations to which such continuing disclosure documents relate must be identified by CUSIP number or numbers. Financial information and operating data to be provided pursuant to this Section may be set forth in full in one or more documents or may be included by specific reference to any document(including an official statement or other offering document) available to the public through EMMA or filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. F. General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance with the Rule. Because the issuance of the Bonds is subject to the provisions of the Rule and because the potential "underwriters"in a negotiated sale of the Bonds or the initial purchasers in a competitive sale of the Bonds may be subject to MSRB rules and regulations with respect to such sale (including certain due diligence and suitability requirements, among others), the City hereby adopts the General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance with the Rule (the Policies and Procedures), attached hereto as Exhibit E, with which the City shall follow to assure compliance with the Undertaking. The City has developed these Policies and Procedures for the purpose of meeting its requirements of the Undertaking and,in connection therewith, has sought the guidance from its internal staff charged with administering the City's financial affairs, its municipal or financial advisors, its legal counsel (including its Bond Counsel), and its independent accountants (to the extent determined to be necessary or advisable). The Policies and Procedures can be amended at the sole discretion of the City and any such amendment will not be deemed to be an amendment to the Undertaking. Each Authorized Official is hereby authorized to amend the Policies and Procedures as a result of a change in law,a future issuance of indebtedness subject to the Rule, or another purpose determined by the Authorized Official to be necessary or desirable for or with respect to future compliance with the Undertaking. SECTION 47. Book-Entry Onl S sem. The Bonds initially shall be registered so as to participate in a securities depository system (the DTC System) with the Depository Trust Company,New York,New York, or any successor entity thereto (DTC), as set forth herein. Each Stated Maturity of the Bonds shall be issued (following cancellation of the Initial Bond described in Section 7) in the form of a separate single definitive Bond. Upon issuance,the ownership of each such Bond shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC, and all of the Outstanding Bonds shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC. The City and the Paying Agent/Registrar are authorized to execute, deliver, and take the actions set forth in such letters to or agreements with DTC as shall be necessary to effectuate the DTC System, including the Letter of Representations attached hereto as Exhibit D(the Representation Letter). With respect to the Bonds registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC,the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any broker-dealer, bank, or other financial institution for which DTC holds the Bonds from time to time as securities depository(a Depository Participant) or to any person on behalf of whom such a Depository Participant holds an interest in the Bonds (an Indirect Participant). Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to (i)the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co., or any Depository Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii)the delivery to any Depository Participant or any other person,other than a registered owner of the Bonds,as shown on the Security Register,of any notice with respect to the Bonds,including any notice of redemption, or (iii)the delivery to any Depository Participant or any Indirect Participant or any other Person, other than a Holder of a Bond, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. While in the DTC System, no person other than Cede & Co., or any successor thereto, as nominee for DTC, shall receive a bond certificate evidencing the obligation of the City to make 138398800.4 -52- payments of principal,premium,if any, and interest pursuant to this Ordinance. Upon delivery by DTC to the Paying Agent/Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., and subject to the provisions in this Ordinance with respect to interest checks or drafts being mailed to the Holder, the word "Cede & Co." in this Ordinance shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. In the event that (a) the City determines that DTC is incapable of discharging its responsibilities described herein and in the Representation Letter, (b)the Representation Letter shall be terminated for any reason,or(c)DTC or the City determines that it is in the best interest of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they be able to obtain certificated Bonds,the City shall notify the Paying Agent/Registrar, DTC, and the Depository Participants of the availability within a reasonable period of time through DTC of bond certificates, and the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. However,the City will not discontinue the use of DTC without prior notice and consent of the Purchaser for so long as the Purchaser is the Holder of any of the Bonds. At that time,the City may determine that the Bonds shall be registered in the name of and deposited with a successor depository operating a securities depository system, as may be acceptable to the City, or such depository's agent or designee, and if the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar do not select such alternate securities depository system then the Bonds may be registered in whatever name or names the Holders of Bonds transferring or exchanging the Bonds shall designate,in accordance with the provisions hereof. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given,respectively,in the manner provided in the Representation Letter. SECTION 48. Further Procedures. The officers and employees of the City are hereby authorized, empowered and directed from time to time and at any time to do and perform all such acts and things and to execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name and under the corporate seal and on behalf of the City all such instruments,whether or not herein mentioned, as may be necessary or desirable in order to carry out the terms and provisions of this Ordinance, the initial sale and delivery of the Bonds, the Agreement, the Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement, and the application to the Purchaser. In addition, prior to the initial delivery of the Bonds, each Authorized Official and Bond Counsel are hereby authorized and directed to approve any technical changes or corrections to this Ordinance or to any of the instruments authorized and approved by this Ordinance necessary in order to (i)correct any ambiguity or mistake or properly or more completely document the transactions contemplated and approved by this Ordinance, (ii) obtain a rating from any of the national bond rating agencies, or (iii) obtain the approval of the Bonds by the Texas Attorney General's office. In case any officer of the City whose signature shall appear on any certificate shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of such certificate, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if such officer had remained in office until such delivery. SECTION 49. Unavailability of Authorized Publication. If, because of the temporary or permanent suspension of any newspaper,journal, or other publication, or for any reason, publication of notice cannot be made meeting any requirements herein established,any notice required to be published by the provisions of this Ordinance shall be given in such other manner and at such time or times as in the judgment of the City or of the Paying Agent/Registrar shall most effectively approximate such required publication and the giving of such notice in such manner shall for all purposes of this Ordinance be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements for publication thereof. SECTION 50. No Recourse Against City Officials. No recourse shall be had for the payment of principal of,premium,if any,or interest on any Bond or for any claim based thereon or on this Ordinance against any official of the City or any person executing any Bond. 138398800.4 -53- SECTION 51. Automatic Budget Amendments to Reflect Final Debt Service Pam. To the extent that the City Council has adopted an annual budget that includes payment of debt service on any Bonds issued (or to be issued)pursuant to this Ordinance based on the City's reasonable expectations and projections relative to those Bonds,such budget entries shall,upon the issuance of Bonds,be automatically adjusted to reflect actual debt service payments on those Bonds coming due during the period of time covered by such budget. The Authorized Official, or the designee thereof, is authorized to make such necessary budget entries and/or adjustments to reflect these final debt service amounts. SECTION 52. Covenants of Compliance. The City shall faithfully and punctually perform all duties with reference to the System required by the Act, all other applicable laws of the State of Texas,and the provisions of this Ordinance and that the City shall render no free service to any customers or other persons. SECTION 53. Application to Texas Water Development Board. The City Council ratifies and confirms its prior approval of the form and content of the Application to the Texas Water Development Board (the Application) prepared in connection with the sale of the Bonds to the Purchaser and hereby approves the form and content of any addenda, supplement,or amendment thereto. SECTION 54. Authorization of a Financing Agreement with the Texas Water Development Board. The City Council authorizes the execution of a Financing Agreement between the City and the Purchaser in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G. Each Authorized Official is hereby authorized to finalize the Financing Agreement with the Purchaser and to approve any amendments or revisions to the Financing Agreement. Additionally,each Authorized Official is authorized to execute and submit the Financing Agreement to the Purchaser and appear before the Purchaser, along with Bond Counsel,Financial Advisor, and consulting engineers. SECTION 55. Construction of Terms. If appropriate in the context of this Ordinance, words of the singular number shall be considered to include the plural,words of the plural number shall be considered to include the singular, and words of the masculine, feminine, or neuter gender shall be considered to include the other genders. SECTION 56. Ancillary Bond Contracts. Though such parties may be identified, and the entry into a particular form of contract may be authorized herein, the City Council hereby delegates to each Authorized Official the authority to independently select the counterparty to any agreement with any paying agent/registrar,rating agency, securities depository,escrow agent, or any other contract that is determined by an Authorized Official, the City's Financial Advisor, or the City's Bond Counsel to be necessary or incidental to the issuance of the Bonds as long as each of such contracts has a value of less than the amount referenced in Section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code (collectively, the Ancillary Bond Contracts); and,as necessary,to execute the Ancillary Bond Contracts on behalf and as the act and deed of the City. The City Council has not participated in the selection of any of the business entities which are counterparties to the Ancillary Bond Contracts. SECTION 57. City's Consent to Provide Information and Documentation to the Texas MAC. The Municipal Advisory Council of Texas (the Texas AMC), a non-profit membership corporation organized exclusively for non-profit purposes described in section 501(c)(6)of the Internal Revenue Code and which serves as a comprehensive financial information repository regarding municipal debt issuers in Texas, requires provision of written documentation regarding the issuance of municipal debt by the issuers thereof. In support of the purpose of the Texas MAC and in compliance with applicable law, the City hereby consents to and authorizes the Authorized Official, the City's Bond Counsel, and/or the City's Financial Advisor to provide to the Texas MAC information and documentation requested by the Texas MAC relating to the Bonds; provided, however, that no such information and documentation shall be provided prior to 138398800.4 -54- the Closing Date. This consent and authorization relates only to information and documentation that is a part of the public record concerning the issuance of the Bonds. SECTION 58. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138398800.4 -55- SIGNED AND SEALED THIS DAY OF ,2024. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (SEAL) APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2024: Miles Risley, City Attorney Signature page to the Ordinance S-1 THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTIES OF NUECES, § ARANSAS,KLEBERG,AND § SAN PATRICIO § CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI § I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the day of , 2024, authorizing the issuance of one or more series of the City's Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, which ordinance is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public,and public notice of the time,place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City,this the DAY OF ,2024. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) Signature page to the Ordinance S-2 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of ,2024,by the following vote: Paulette Guajardo Jim Klein Roland Barrera Mike Pusley Sylvia Campos Everett Roy Gil Hernandez Dan Suckley Michael Hunter That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of 2024,by the following vote: Paulette Guajardo Jim Klein Roland Barrera Mike Pusley Sylvia Campos Everett Roy Gil Hernandez Dan Suckley Michael Hunter PASSED AND APPROVED,this the day of ,2024. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Paulette Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Signature page to the Ordinance S-3 INDEX TO SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS Schedule I .....................Approval Certificate Exhibit A.......................Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement Exhibit B.......................Escrow Agreement Exhibit C.......................Description of Annual Financial Infonnation Exhibit D....................... DTC Letter of Representations Exhibit E.......................General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance With the Rule Exhibit F................Form of Reimbursement Agreement Exhibit G................Financing Agreement Index-I SCHEDULEI Approval Certificate See Tab No. 138398800.4 Schedule 11-1 EXHIBIT A Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement See Tab No. 138398800.4 A-1 EXHIBIT B Escrow Agreement See Tab No. 138398800.4 B-1 EXHIBIT C Description of Annual Financial Information The following information is referred to in Section 46 of this Ordinance. Annual Financial Statements and Operating Data The financial information and operating data with respect to the City to be provided annually in accordance with such Section are as specified (and included in the Appendix or under the headings of the Application referred to)below: The City's audited financial statements for the most recently concluded Fiscal Year or to the extent these audited financial statements are not available, the portion of the unaudited financial statements of the City referenced in the Application, but for the most recently concluded Fiscal Year. Accounting Principles The accounting principles referred to in such Section are the accounting principles described in the notes to the financial statements referred to above. 138398800.4 C-I EXHIBIT D DTC Letter of Representations See Tab No. 138398800.4 D-1 EXHIBIT E General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance with the Rule I. Capitalized terms used in this Exhibit have the meanings ascribed thereto in Section 46 of the Ordinance. Bonds refer to the Bonds that are the subject of the Ordinance to which this Exhibit is attached. II. As a capital markets participant, the City is aware of its continuing disclosure requirements and obligations existing under the Rule prior to February 27, 2019, the effective date of the most recent amendment to the Rule (the Effective Date), and has implemented and maintained internal policies, processes,and procedures to ensure compliance therewith. Adherence to these internal policies,processes, and procedures has enabled underwriters in non-exempt negotiated sales and initial purchasers in non- exempt competitive sales to comply with their obligations arising under various MSRB rules and regulations concerning due diligence and findings of suitability, among other matters,regarding the City's compliance with the Rule. III. The City is aware that the Rule was amended as of the Effective Date (the Rule Amendment) and has accommodated this amendment by adding subparagraphs(15)and(16)to Section 46C of the Ordinance, which provisions are a part of the Undertaking. IV. The City is aware that "participating underwriters" (as such term is defined in the Rule) of the Bonds must make inquiry and reasonably believe that the City is likely to comply with the Undertaking and that the standards for determining compliance have increased over time as a result of, among others, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative and regulatory commentary relating to the effectiveness of the Rule Amendment. V. The City now establishes the following general policies and procedures (the Policies and Procedures) for satisfying its obligations pursuant to the Undertaking,which policies and procedures have been developed based on the City's informal policies, procedures, and processes utilized prior to the Effective Date for compliance with the City's obligations under the Rule,the advice from and discussions with the City's internal senior staff(including staff charged with administering the City's financial affairs), its co-municipal or financial advisors, its legal counsel (including Bond Counsel), and its independent accountants,to the extent determined to be necessary or advisable (collectively,the Compliance Team): I. The Director of Finance and Procurement (the Compliance Officer) shall be responsible for satisfying the City's obligations pursuant to the Undertaking through adherence to these Policies and Procedures; 2. the Compliance Officer shall establish reminder or"tickler"systems to identify and timely report to the MSRB, in the format thereby prescribed from time to time, the City's information of the type described in Section 46B of the Ordinance; 3. the Compliance Officer shall promptly determine the occurrence of any of the events described in Section 46C of the Ordinance; 4. the Compliance Officer shall work with external consultants of the City, as and to the extent necessary,to timely prepare and file with the MSRB the annual information of the City and notice of the occurrence of any of the events referenced in Clauses 2 and 3 above, respectively, the foregoing being required to satisfy the terms of the Undertaking; 138398800.4 E-I 5. the Compliance Officer shall establish a system for identifying and monitoring any Financial Obligations,whether now existing or hereafter entered into by the City,and(upon identification) determining if such Financial Obligation has the potential to materially impact the security or source of repayment of the Bonds; 6. upon identification of any Financial Obligation meeting the materiality standard identified in Clause 5 above,the Compliance Officer shall establish a process for identifying and monitoring any City agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms under such Financial Obligation; 7. the Compliance Officer shall establish a process for identifying the occurrence of any default, event of acceleration,termination event,modification of terms,or other similar events under the terms of any Financial Obligation,the occurrence of any of which reflect financial difficulties of the City; and 8. the Compliance Officer shall annually review these Policies and Procedures with the remainder of the Compliance Team, make any modifications on an internal document retained by the Compliance Officer and available to any "participating underwriter" (as defined in the Rule), if requested, and on the basis of this annual review (to the extent determined to be necessary or desirable), seek additional training for herself or himself, as well as other members of the City's internal staff identified by the Compliance Officer to assist with the City's satisfaction of the terms and provisions of the Undertaking. 138398800.4 E-2 EXHIBIT F Form of Reimbursement Agreement Not applicable 138398800.4 F-I EXHIBIT G Financing Agreement 138398800.4 G-1 Preliminary City of Corpus Christi, Texas Comparison of TWDB (SWIFT)vs. Market Financing As of 1/11/24 for Purposes of Illustration Only Cash Flow Comparison @ 4.5155679% DATE Est. TWDB Deal Est. Mkt Deal Savings PV Factor PV Savings 09/30/2025 4,966,092.00 6,624,500.00 1,658,408.00 0.9706698x 1,609,766.49 09/30/2026 12,059,138.00 13,126,750.00 1,067,612.00 0.9282795x 1,017,110.66 09/30/2027 12,059,136.00 13,127,250.00 1,068,114.00 0.8877404x 972,842.27 09/30/2028 12,060,208.00 13,124,750.00 1,064,542.00 0.8489717x 926,954.91 09/30/2029 12,063,588.00 13,124,000.00 1,060,412.00 0.8118962x 882,670.27 09/30/2030 12,062,088.00 13,124,500.00 1,062,412.00 0.7764397x 845,167.53 09/30/2031 12,061,913.00 13,125,750.00 1,063,837.00 0.7425317x 808,783.26 09/30/2032 12,062,385.00 13,127,250.00 1,064,865.00 0.7101044x 773,639.84 09/30/2033 12,063,323.00 13,123,500.00 1,060,177.00 0.6790933x 736,097.91 09/30/2034 12,060,096.00 13,124,250.00 1,064,154.00 0.6494365x 705,940.45 09/30/2035 12,063,810.00 13,123,750.00 1,059,940.00 0.6210749x 671,868.48 09/30/2036 12,062,596.00 13,126,500.00 1,063,904.00 0.5939518x 644,304.75 09/30/2037 12,059,990.00 13,126,750.00 1,066,760.00 0.5680132x 617,262.72 09/30/2038 12,063,569.50 13,124,000.00 1,060,430.50 0.5432074x 586,369.17 09/30/2039 12,062,749.50 13,122,750.00 1,060,000.50 0.5194849x 560,096.01 09/30/2040 12,064,053.50 13,127,250.00 1,063,196.50 0.4967984x 536,792.98 09/30/2041 12,060,900.00 13,126,500.00 1,065,600.00 0.4751026x 514,076.33 09/30/2042 12,062,478.00 13,125,000.00 1,062,522.00 0.4543543x 489,827.04 09/30/2043 12,059,030.50 13,127,000.00 1,067,969.50 0.4345122x 470,412.50 09/30/2044 12,062,034.50 13,126,500.00 1,064,465.50 0.4155365x 448,021.28 09/30/2045 12,060,467.00 13,122,750.00 1,062,283.00 0.3973895x 427,197.25 09/30/2046 12,061,479.00 13,125,000.00 1,063,521.00 0.380035lx 408,673.63 09/30/2047 12,059,523.50 13,127,000.00 1,067,476.50 0.3634385x 391,910.93 09/30/2048 12,059,201.50 13,127,750.00 1,068,548.50 0.3475667x 374,799.76 09/30/2049 12,059,914.50 13,126,250.00 1,066,335.50 0.332388lx 357,312.71 09/30/2050 12,061,064.00 13,126,500.00 1,065,436.00 0.3178723x 341,024.56 09/30/2051 12,063,164.00 13,127,250.00 1,064,086.00 0.3039904x 325,339.11 09/30/2052 12,063,740.00 13,127,250.00 1,063,510.00 0.2907148x 310,568.00 09/30/2053 12,062,180.00 13,125,250.00 1,063,070.00 0.2780190x 296,473.42 09/30/2054 12,062,872.00 13,125,000.00 1,062,128.00 0.2658775x 282,852.59 Total $354,752,784.00 $387,268,500.00 $32,515,716.00 - $18,334,156.81 Issues in New Cash Flow: 2024 211 mm SWI Issues in Old Cash Flow 2024 Desal Util 2024 Desal LIN Revs(1/1 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 1/16/2024 1 2:57 PM so �o p A v WoRPORPg4 AGENDA MEMORANDUM 1852 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Alma I. Casas, Interim Director of Finance and Procurement almacCa)-cctexas.com (361) 826-3610 Reimbursement Resolution for Capital Expenditures Related to the Inner Harbor Desalination Water Treatment Plant (SWIFT II Tranche 2) CAPTION: Resolution relating to the City's intention to reimburse itself for the prior lawful expenditure of funds relating to any capital expenditures from the proceeds of one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations to be issued by the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $211,050,000 for authorized purposes; authorizing other matters incident and related thereto; and providing an effective date. SUMMARY: The City of Corpus Christi is planning on awarding contracts for utility system capital projects related to the Inner Harbor Desalination Plant Project prior to the issuance of Utility System Revenue Bonds planned for the spring. This resolution is needed for the City to move forward with incurring capital costs and then reimburse itself for these costs with bond proceeds once issued. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City is planning on issuing Utility System Revenue Bonds to fund the Inner Harbor Desalination Plant Project, which is being funded through the Texas Water Development Board State Water Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT) Loan Program. The City is able to award contracts for these projects prior to the issuance of bonds in order to move forward with the projects early in the fiscal year. The City plans on issuing bonds as funds are needed beginning in spring 2024 and will reimburse itself an amount not to exceed $211,050,000 for expenditures with the bond proceeds. For the City to be eligible for reimbursement of any expenditure incurred prior to the bond sale, the City must declare its intent to reimburse itself for payments made prior to the bonds being sold. This action must meet specific U.S. Treasury Regulations and requires approval by the City Council. It is not anticipated that the full amount will be committed prior to the bond issuance, but it is best practice to approve reimbursement for the full amount. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative would be to reject the reimbursement resolution, but this would prevent contracts from being awarded and delay the start of the project until the bonds have been issued. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item will authorize City staff to encumber and spend available Utility System cash to begin awarding projects. Once the Utility System Revenue Bonds are issued, the cash funds will be replenished with bond proceeds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend approval of the resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FOR THE PRIOR LAWFUL EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS RELATING TO ANY CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF TAX-EXEMPT OR TAXABLE OBLIGATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $211,050,000 FOR AUTHORIZED PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council (the Governing Body) of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the Issuer) has entered into or will enter into various contracts pertaining to the expenditure of lawfully available funds of the Issuer to finance costs associated with: (1)constructing,improving, enlarging, repairing, and extending the City's combined utility system and the purchase of equipment, supplies, machinery, and other personal property relating to the System (the Construction Costs),(2)the payment of various engineering costs,including design testing, design engineering,and construction inspection related to the Construction Costs(the Engineering Costs), (3) the payment of various architectural costs, including preparation of plans and specifications and various other plans and drawings related to the Construction Costs (the Architectural Costs), and (4) the payment of various administrative costs, including the fees of bond counsel, financial advisor, project manager, project consultant, other professionals, and bond printer (the Administrative Costs)the Construction Costs, the Engineering Costs,the Architectural Costs, and the Administrative Costs collectively constitute the costs of the projects that are the subject of this Resolution (the Project); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 1201.042, as amended, Texas Government Code (Section 1201.042) provide that the proceeds from the sale of obligations issued to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping, or furnishing of any project or facilities, such as the Project, may be used to reimburse the Issuer for costs attributable to such project or facilities paid or incurred before the date of issuance of such obligations; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Treasury (the Department) released Regulation Section 1.150-2 (the Regulations) which establishes when the proceeds of obligations are spent and therefore are no longer subject to various federal income tax restrictions contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended(the Code); and WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to reimburse itself, within eighteen months from the later of the date of expenditure or the date the property financed is placed in service (but in no event more than three years after the original expenditures are paid), for the prior lawful capital expenditure of funds from the proceeds of one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations (the Obligations) that the Issuer currently contemplates issuing obligations in the principal amount of not to exceed $211,050,000 to finance a portion of the costs of the Project; and 138616714.3 WHEREAS, under the Regulations, to fund such reimbursement with proceeds of the Obligations,the Issuer must declare its expectation ultimately to make such reimbursement before making the expenditures; and WHEREAS, the Issuer hereby finds and determines that the reimbursement for the prior expenditure of funds of the Issuer is not inconsistent with the Issuer's budgetary and financial circumstances; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the residents of the Issuer; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION I. This Resolution is a declaration of intent to establish the Issuer's reasonable, official intent under section 1.150-2 of the Regulations and Section 1201.042 to reimburse itself from certain of the proceeds of the Obligations for any capital expenditures previously incurred (not more than 60 days prior to the date hereof) or to be incurred with respect to the Project from the Issuer's General Fund or other lawfully available funds of the Issuer. SECTION 2. The Issuer intends to issue the Obligations and allocate within 30 days after the date of issuance of the Obligations the proceeds therefrom to reimburse the Issuer for prior lawful expenditures with respect to the Project in a manner to comply with the Regulations. SECTION 3. The reimbursed expenditure will be a type properly chargeable to a capital account (or would be so chargeable with a proper election) under general federal income tax principles. SECTION 4. The Issuer intends to otherwise comply, in addition to those matters addressed within this Resolution, with all the requirements contained in the Regulations. SECTION 5. This Resolution maybe relied upon by the appropriate officials at the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas and establishes compliance by the Issuer with the requirements of Texas law and the Regulations. SECTION 6. With respect to the proceeds of the Obligations allocated to reimburse the Issuer for prior expenditures, the Issuer shall not employ an abusive device under Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-10,including using within one year of the reimbursement allocation,the funds corresponding to the proceeds of the Obligations in a manner that results in the creation of replacement proceeds, as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1, of the Obligations or another issue of tax-exempt obligations. SECTION 7. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Governing Body. SECTION 8. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, 138616714.3 and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 9. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 10. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid,the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the Governing Body hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 11. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time,place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. SECTION 12. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank] 138616714.3 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED on this the 23rd day of January, 2024. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (CITY SEAL) APPROVED THIS 23rd day of January, 2024: Miles Risley, City Attorney Signature page to the Resolution S-1 THE STATE OF TEXAS )( COUNTY OF NUECES )( I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of a Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the 23rd day of January, 2024, relating to establishing the City's intention to reimburse itself in an amount not to exceed $211,050,000 for the prior lawful expenditure of funds relating to constructing various capital improvements to City property, which Resolution is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City, this the 23rd day of January, 2024. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) Signature page to the Resolution S-2 That the foregoing resolution was read and passed on this the 23rd day of January, 2024, by the following vote: Paulette Guajardo Sylvia Campos Michael Hunter Roland Barrera Jim Klein Dan Suckley Mike Pusley Gil Hernandez Everett Roy PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 23rd day of January, 2024. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Paulette Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Signature page to the Resolution S-3 so �o o� A PH v AGENDA MEMORANDUM WoRPORPg4 1852 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Drew Molly, Interim Chief Operations Officer for Corpus Christi Water DrewM(a)cctexas.com (361) 826-3556 Alma Iris Casas, Interim Director of Finance and Procurement almac(a)cctexas.com (361) 826-3610 Resolution authorizing execution of all documents necessary to make an abridged and full application to the Texas Water Development Board CAPTION: Resolution authorizing execution of all documents necessary to make an abridged and full application to the Texas Water Development Board for an amount up to $535,110,000 for the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant from the State Water Implementation Fund to complete the Project. SUMMARY: This resolution authorizes the documents necessary to make the abridged and full application to the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) for the additional funding necessary from State Water Implementation Fund (SWIFT) to complete the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant (Project) for an amount up to $535,110,000. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The SWIFT loan program was created by the Texas Legislature to provide affordable, ongoing state financial assistance for projects in the state water plan. The program helps communities develop cost-effective water supplies by providing low-interest loans, extended repayment terms, deferral of loan repayments, and incremental repurchase terms. Through fiscal year 2019, SWIFT committed over $8.3 billion for projects across Texas. To apply for funding, entities must first submit an abridged and full loan application for their projects to be evaluated. The projects are ranked and the top projects that are within the limits of available funding are invited to submit a full application. Once the full application is evaluated and approved, TWDB offers financing through the loan program. The interest rate charged by the TWDB is based on the TWDB's cost of funds sold with the State of Texas' General Obligation AAA rating. The lending rate balances reasonable rates for TWDB customers that cover TWDB's cost of funds and risk exposure. Utilization of the TWDB funding option is being recommended especially since the interest rate that will be charged for these obligations is based on a AAA rating -- which is a higher rating than the City's AA-/Aa3 rating for its utility priority lien bonds and junior lien utility bonds therefore resulting in a lower interest rate. In addition, the SWIFT loan program provides a percentage subsidy reducing the interest rate. The City of Corpus Christi has been evaluating alternative water sources for decades. After the 2011-2013 drought, the City of Corpus Christi worked with regional partners to investigate potential water sources for a new uninterruptible water supply. Following extensive evaluations of the quality, quantity, and reliability of alternative water supplies, seawater desalination was determined to be the most safe, reliable, and cost-effective alternative. Freese and Nichols was selected as the City's Owner's Representative consultant for the seawater desalination project in 2014. They have been working alongside City staff since 2014 to plan for a new water supply and to obtain the best value for the region. On February 6, 2020, the City submitted an abridged loan application to the TWDB for the design and construction of a Seawater Desalination Water Treatment Plant within the Inner Harbor of the Corpus Christi Ship channel to provide a new water supply. The abridged loan application in the amount of$222,475,000 was the first step in the process of applying for the SWIFT loan program. On April 9, 2020, the Texas Water Development Board approved the City's abridged loan application and invited the City to submit their full loan application due by May 11 , 2020, which was the second step in the process. On April 21 , 2020, the City Council approved a resolution for the City to submit the full SWIFT loan application to the TWBD. This application was approved by the TWDB board on July 23, 2020. The City was awarded the full $222,475,000 (SWIFT 2020) that was disbursed in two parts: $11 ,425,000 in 2020 to finalize requirements and develop the Design-Build acquisition package, and $211 ,050,000 for Design-Build construction. On July 23, 2020, the City of Corpus Christi was approved to receive a low interest loan through the TWDB SWIFT program in an amount not to exceed $222,475,000 (also referred to as the SWIFT 2020 loan) to fund the design and construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant. The amount requested for the SWIFT 2020 loan was based on a cost model created by City and City's Owners Representatives between the years 2018 and 2019. The cost was for a desalination plant with an average daily production of 20 million gallons a day (MGD) and expandable to 30 MGD in the Inner Harbor. The cost model was representative of 2019 costs and the results of the model were used as the basis for the SWIFT 2020 loan. The Project timeline identified a construction between 2021-2025. Starting in 2021 through 2023, significant delays to the permitting efforts by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality occurred, causing a delay in project construction. In January of 2024, the City's Owners Representative submitted an updated cost model with a plant construction cost of $541 .5 million. The updated cost model also includes integration of the new water supply into the City's distribution system, an enhanced high service pump station, and a pilot system. As a result of inflation, cost escalations, and the previously mentioned scope, the total project cost increased. The cost for the high service pump station is $66.5 million, the integration infrastructure is $43.6 million, power transmission infrastructure is $3 million, and the non-construction amount is $102.9 million for the 30 MGD plant. The last step in the process is for the City to execute all documents necessary to make applications to the TWDB for the additional funding necessary from the SWIFT fund. The amount requested for the SWIFT 2020 loan was based on a cost model created by City and City's Owners Representatives between the years 2018 and 2019. The cost was for a desalination plant with an average daily production of 20 MGD and expandable to 30 MGD in the Inner Harbor. The cost model was representative of 2019 costs and the results of the model were used as the basis for the SWIFT 2020 loan. Similar to the SWIFT 2020, an abridged application will need to be submitted in February 2024 for an additional balance up to $535,110,000. If approved, the City will then be invited to submit a full application by the April/May timeframe for the total amount being requested. The TWDB will announce the successful applicants in July, and in August/September, the City will issue debt to collateralize the loan. The City will enter a multi-year agreement, with a first tranche of $10,000,000. The TWDB requires that applicants close on a de minimis amount in year one. It is common to close on the fiscal and legal costs in year one that are associated with the bonding transaction which include the fees of the applicant's financial advisor and bond counsel and other fees associated with the transaction. At this time, City staff estimate these fees to be approximately 2% of the SWIFT 3 funding application to TWDB, or $10,000,000. The debt sale for the first tranche will be a private placement with TWDB and the debt will be issued at a lower interest rate than the City could receive if the debt was sold on the open market. The City will issue the debt in the October 2024 timeframe. This resolution would authorize the documents necessary to make an application to the TWDB for the additional funding necessary from SWIFT. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative to applying for the SWIFT loan would be to secure alternative funding that is not offered through the SWIFT loan program. If we do not apply for the SWIFT loan program, the City would not realize the low rates offered by the TWDB through the SWIFT loan program. As a result, the City would pay a higher rate of interest to fund the design and construction of the seawater desalination facility which could negatively affect utility rates. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact would be the approval and award of the application for potential funding of$535,110,000. The fiscal impact for the first tranche of$10,000,000 will be in ordinance 24-0111 . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution authorizing execution of all documents necessary to make applications to the Texas Water Development Board for the additional funding necessary from the State Water Implementation Fund. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S UTILITY SYSTEM; AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF AND CONSULTANTS TO COORDINATE THE SUBMISSION OF THE APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR FUNDING FROM ITS STATE WATER IMPLEMENTATION FUND FOR TEXAS; AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS,the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the City) deems it necessary to apply to the Texas Water Development Board(the Board for financial assistance; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Board, which govern the procedures in making such an application, the governing body of the City is required to pass a resolution to accompany such application; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI THAT: 1. The City hereby requests that the Board, from its State Water Implementation Fund for Texas, grant financial assistance to the City in the amount not to exceed $535,110,000.00 (as a loan or by the purchase of obligations of the City and by the receipt of the largest amount of grant funds lawfully available from the Board) for constructing improvements to the City's combined utility system, as designed the by the City's consulting engineer. These obligations will be issued by the City in one or more series. 2. The City Manager,Chief Financial Officer,or Director of Finance and Procurement of the City is hereby authorized to execute and submit to the Board the application for such financial assistance, and the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, or Director of Finance and Procurement of the City, together with bond counsel, financial advisors and consulting engineers named in such application,are authorized to appear before the Board in support of such application and to make the required assurances and representations to the Board in accordance with the rules, regulations, and policies of the Board. 3. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the application for financial assistance herein authorized to be prepared and submitted to the Board, and the City Secretary of the City is authorized and directed to prepare and certify such number of copies of this Resolution as may be required for purposes of supporting the submission of such application to the Board. 4. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City. 5. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. 6. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. 7. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. 8. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. 9. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED on the 23rd day of January, 2024. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Attest: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) APPROVED THIS 23rd day of January, 2024: Miles Risley, City Attorney THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI § I,the undersigned,City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas,do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas(and of the minutes pertaining thereto)on the 23rd day of January,2024,authorizing the City to request financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board,which resolution is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public,and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID CITY,THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2024. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) That the foregoing resolution was read for the first time and passed on this the 23rd day of January, 2024, by the following vote: Paulette Guaj ardo Jim Klein Ronald Barrera Mike Pusley Sylvia Campos Everett Roy Gil Hernandez Dan Suckley Michael Hunter PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 23rd day of January, 2024. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Paulette Guajardo City Secretary Mayor 138639381.3 S 00 Oki U NCOHP00.Pt�'� 1852 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 30, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Alma I. Casas, Interim Director of Finance and Procurement almacCa)cctexas.com (361) 826-3610 Delegating the Authorization for the Issuance of Utility System Revenue Improvement Bonds (SWIFT III Tranche 1) CAPTION: Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas authorizing the private placement issuance of its Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds with the Texas Water Development Board in one or more series (as designated by purpose and series)for water, wastewater, and stormwater utility improvements in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000, within set parameters; making provisions for the payment and security thereof by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the City's Utility System on a parity with certain currently outstanding Utility System Revenue Obligations; stipulating the terms and conditions for the issuance of additional revenue bonds on a parity therewith; prescribing the form, terms, conditions, and resolving other matters incident and related to the issuance, sale, and delivery of one or more series of bonds; appropriating the proceeds from the sale of the bonds; authorizing the execution of one or more paying agent/registrar agreements and one or more escrow agreements; complying with the requirements imposed by the letter of representations previously executed with the Depository Trust Company; complying with the regulations promulgated by the Texas Water Development Board; delegating authority to the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement to execute certain documents relating to the sale of each series of bonds; authorizing the execution and approval of a financing agreement between the City and the Texas Water Development Board related to the bonds; enacting other provisions incident and related to the subject and purpose of this ordinance; and providing an effective date. SUMMARY: The City intends to issue $10,000,000 of Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds funded by the Texas Water Development Board State Water Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT) Loan Program to build the Inner Harbor Desalination Water Treatment Plant. The amount of bond issuance included in the ordinance includes estimated costs of issuance and accounts for any fluctuations in the bond market at the time of pricing. The ordinance delegates the authority to issue the bonds to the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement within the parameters set forth in the ordinance. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The SWIFT loan program was created by the Texas Legislature to provide affordable, ongoing state financial assistance for projects in the state water plan. The program helps communities develop cost-effective water supplies by providing low-interest loans, extended repayment terms, deferral of loan repayments, and incremental repurchase terms. Through fiscal year 2019, SWIFT committed over $8.3 billion for projects across Texas. To apply for funding, entities must first submit an abridged and full loan application for their projects to be evaluated. The projects are ranked and the top projects that are within the limits of available funding are invited to submit a full application. Once the full application is evaluated and approved, TWDB offers financing through the loan program. The interest rate charged by the TWDB is based on the TWDB's cost of funds sold with the State of Texas' General Obligation AAA rating. The lending rate balances reasonable rates for TWDB customers that cover TWDB's cost of funds and risk exposure. Utilization of the TWDB funding option is being recommended especially since the interest rate that will be charged for these obligations is based on a AAA rating -- which is a higher rating than the City's AA-/Aa3 rating for its utility priority lien bonds and junior lien utility bonds therefore resulting in a lower interest rate. In addition, the SWIFT loan program provides a percentage subsidy reducing the interest rate. On July 23, 2020, the City of Corpus Christi was approved to receive a low interest loan through the TWDB SWIFT program in an amount not to exceed $222,475,000 (also referred to as the SWIFT 2020 loan)to fund the design and construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant. The amount requested for the SWIFT 2020 loan was based on a cost model created by City and City's Owners Representatives between the years 2018 and 2019. The cost was for a desalination plant with an average daily production of 20 million gallons a day (MGD) and expandable to 30 MGD in the Inner Harbor. The cost model was representative of 2019 costs and the results of the model were used as the basis for the SWIFT 2020 loan. In January of 2024, the City's Owners Representative submitted an updated cost model with a plant construction cost of$541.5 million. The updated cost model also includes integration of the new water supply into the City's distribution system, an enhanced high service pump station, and a pilot system. As a result of inflation, cost escalations, and the previously mentioned scope, the total project cost increased. The cost for the high service pump station is $66.5 million, the integration infrastructure is $43.6 million, power transmission infrastructure is $3.1 million, and the non-construction amount is $102.9 million for the 30 MGD plant. The City plans to enter into a multi-year annual commitment loan through the SWIFT Loan Program with the Texas Water Development Board in the Spring of 2024 for a total amount of $535,110,000 for the purpose of building the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Plant. The TWDB requires that applicants close on a de minimis amount in year one. It is common to close on the fiscal and legal costs in year one that are associated with the bonding transaction which include the fees of the applicant's financial advisor and bond counsel and other fees associated with the transaction. At this time, City staff estimate these fees to be approximately 2% of the SWIFT 3 funding application to TWDB, or $10,000,000. The City will apply for the State Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT) Loan Program on or before the TWDB deadline of February 1, 2024. This loan will be used in conjunction with the previous Texas Water Development Board State Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT) Loan to fund the Inner Harbor Desalination Water Treatment Plant. The first tranche of funding will be used for the City's Financial Advisors, Bond Counsel, and to purchase long-lead items for the construction of the project. Because of the fluctuating conditions in the municipal bond market and to ensure that all legal documents are executed on a timely basis, our financial advisor has recommended that the City Council delegate to the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, and the Director of Finance and Procurement - including any person serving in any of the foregoing capacities on an interim or non-permanent basis (the "Authorized Officials") the authority to approve the sale of the bonds subject to the following parameters: 1) The principal amount in total of all bonds sold may not exceed $10,000,000. 2) The interest rate will be set by the terms of the Texas Water Development Board SWIFT Loan guidelines. 3) Maximum maturity of 30 years. The City's bond counsel has confirmed that the City can delegate the sale of the bonds to the Delegated Officials in the manner outlined above pursuant to the authority contained in Chapter 1371, as amended, Texas Government Code. ALTERNATIVES: n/a FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this ordinance is that it will generate $10,000,000 in bond proceeds for use on the Inner Harbor Desalination Water Treatment Plant. COMMENTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT ISSUANCE OF ITS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS WITH THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN ONE OR MORE SERIES(AS DESIGNATED BY PURPOSE AND SERIES) FOR WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $10,000,000, WITHIN SET PARAMETERS; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE PAYMENT AND SECURITY THEREOF BY A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN ON AND PLEDGE OF THE NET REVENUES OF THE CITY'S UTILITY SYSTEM ON A PARITY WITH CERTAIN CURRENTLY OUTSTANDING UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE OBLIGATIONS; STIPULATING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL REVENUE BONDS ON A PARITY THEREWITH; PRESCRIBING THE FORM, TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF BONDS;APPROPRIATING THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ONE OR MORE PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENTS AND ONE OR MORE ESCROW AGREEMENTS; COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE LETTER OF REPRESENTATIONS PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED WITH THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY; COMPLYING WITH THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD; DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT TO EXECUTE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF EACH SERIES OF BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND APPROVAL OF A FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD RELATED TO THE BONDS; ENACTING OTHER PROVISIONS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE SUBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THIS ORDINANCE;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS,the City Council(the City Council)of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas(the City)has heretofore issued, and there are currently Outstanding, revenue bonds (the Previously Issued Parity Obligations) secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues (hereinafter defined) of the City's combined utility systems(as further described and defined herein,the System); and WHEREAS, in the City ordinances authorizing the issuance of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations,the City reserved the right to issue revenue bonds on a parity with the Previously Issued Parity Obligations(hereinafter defined) from time to time outstanding; and WHEREAS,the City Council has heretofore issued,and there are currently outstanding,obligations supported by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System that are inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Previously Issued Parity Obligations (the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations); and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined for the purpose of improving the credit quality of its Previously Issued Parity Obligations,which has become its primary lien for issuing System debt,that it will no longer issue "Priority Bonds"which were previously secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System; and 138634808.3 WHEREAS, on the date hereof, no Priority Bonds remain outstanding and all System revenue obligations previously subordinate and inferior to the Priority Bonds in priority of lien on and pledge of Net Revenues have been elevated in kind and priority as hereinbefore stated, and all Previously Issued Parity Obligations hereinbefore issued with a"Junior Lien" designation are secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues and the Bonds(defined herein)and any Additional Senior Lien Obligations (defined herein)shall be secured by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues on parity with the Previously Issued Parity Obligations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the Bonds and any additional bonds issued on parity with the Previously Issued Parity Obligations bear the designation"Senior Lien"to evidence the first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues is the primary lien for issuing System debt; and WHEREAS, the City Council does not intend to issue System debt bearing the "Junior Lien" designation while any Previously Issued Parity Obligations bearing the "Junior Lien" designation remain Outstanding; and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that a new series of Senior Lien Obligations payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a first and prior lien and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System on parity with the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues securing the Previously Issued Parity Obligations should be issued for the purpose of designing, planning, building, improving, extending, enlarging, and repairing the System; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1371, as amended, Texas Government Code (Chapter 1371) and Chapter 1502, as amended, Texas Government Code (Chapter 1502), and the City's Home Rule Charter,the City Council is authorized to issue revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, the Texas Water Development Board (the Purchaser) has agreed to purchase the revenue bonds herein authorized thereby making a loan to the City at an interest rate that is substantially below the current market rate for similar forms of indebtedness which will enable the City to undertake the proposed improvements to the System; and WHEREAS, [ �, �, Texas, which is not a depository bank of the City, is appointed and will serve as the Paying Agent/Registrar(hereinafter defined); and WHEREAS, [ �, �, Texas, which is not a depository bank of the City, is appointed and will serve as the Escrow Agent(hereinafter defined)for the revenue bonds; and WHEREAS,the City Council hereby finds and determines that,pursuant to applicable Texas law, the delegation to a Pricing Officer with the authority to execute an Approval Certificate (a form of which is attached hereto as Schedule I)to approve the final terms of each series of Bonds as set forth in respective Approval Certificate is in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the revenue bonds hereinafter authorized are to be issued and delivered pursuant to the laws of the State of Texas, including the Act (defined herein), and the terms of this Ordinance (hereinafter defined), for the purposes set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, as a condition precedent to securing the financing assistance with the Purchaser, the Purchaser may require that the City enter into a financing agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G; and 138634808.3 -2- WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the issuance of the revenue bonds authorized herein and the adoption of this Ordinance is in the best interests of the citizens of the City;now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Authorization-Designation-Principal Amount-Purpose. Revenue improvement bonds of the City shall be and are hereby authorized to be issued in the aggregate principal amount of [ ] AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($[ ]),to be designated and bear the title of CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2024[C] (the Bonds),pursuant to this ordinance adopted by the City Council (the Ordinance) for the purpose of (i) designing, planning, building, improving, extending, enlarging, and repairing the System, and (ii)paying the costs of issuance relating thereto. The Bonds shall be payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is on parity with the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations and is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations. The Bonds are authorized to be issued pursuant to the authority conferred by and in conformity with the laws of the State of Texas,including,particularly,Chapter 1371 and Chapter 1502 (collectively,the Act). As authorized by the Act, the Pricing Officer is hereby authorized, appointed, and designated as the officer of the City authorized to individually act on behalf of the City in selling and delivering one or more series of revenue improvement bonds authorized herein and carrying out the procedures specified in this Ordinance, including approval of the following terms and provisions for each series of revenue improvement bonds: A. the style of each series of bonds,which style indicates(with respect to each series of bonds) the use of proceeds thereof, calendar year of issuance, and (if necessary or desired) a letter or other sequential identification indicating that multiple series of bonds of the same or similar type have been or will be issued hereunder during a particular calendar year; B. the aggregate principal amount of each series of bonds, as well as the principal amount of each stated maturity within a series of bonds; C. the rate of interest to be borne on the principal amount of each stated maturity within a series of bonds and the interest payment dates for such series of bonds; D. the Dated Date for each series of bonds; E. the optional,extraordinary optional,and mandatory redemption provisions applicable,if at all,to each series of bonds; F. whether or not to issue such series of bonds on a taxable or tax-exempt basis and, if on a tax-exempt basis, subject to market conditions at the time of pricing and sale of such series of bonds; G. the pricing of each series of bonds, including use of premium, discount, underwriters' compensation, and costs of issuance; and H. the selection of the bond insurer and/or debt service reserve fund surety provider, if any, with respect to the Bonds. If the Pricing Officer chooses to purchase a debt service reserve surety policy or 138634808.3 -3- similar credit facility relating to the Bonds, then the Pricing Officer shall be permitted to execute an insurance or similar reimbursement agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit H(which form is hereby approved)in connection with such purchase. The Bonds shall be issued within the following parameters: A. the principal amount of the Bonds issued hereunder shall not exceed$10,000,000; B. the maximum maturity of any series of Bonds shall not occur later than July 15,2064; C. the true interest cost on each series of Bonds shall not exceed the maximum rate permitted by law; and D. the final series of Bonds hereunder issued shall be sold on or before January 30, 2025 (though the initial delivery of a particular series of Bonds may occur within a reasonable period of time occurring thereafter, as determined by the Pricing Officer). The Pricing Officer, acting for and on behalf of the City, is authorized,with respect to a series of bonds, to complete and execute an Approval Certificate, in substantially the form attached hereto as Schedule I. The execution of the Approval Certificate shall evidence the sale date of each series of Bonds by the City to the initial purchasers thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Act and as set forth in Schedule I. Upon execution of an Approval Certificate,Bond Counsel is authorized to complete a copy of this Ordinance as evidence of the issuance of a series of Bonds pursuant to the delegated authority granted hereunder and to reflect such final terms for such series of Bonds, which includes (A) completion of the preamble to this Ordinance,included deletion of those recitals that are not applicable to the particular series of Bonds then being issued, (B) selection of the appropriate terms to reflect the final transaction structure and terms of sale evidenced in an applicable Approval Certificate, and (C) such other necessary technical modifications to this Ordinance (including the renumbering of sections hereof) to accommodate all other terms and provisions of this Section 1. In addition to the foregoing, the Pricing Officer is authorized to execute,as the act and deed of the City and on behalf of the City Council,any and all contracts,agreements, letters, and certificates, relative to any series of Bonds that may be required by this Ordinance, as supplemented in the manner described above, or determined to be necessary or advisable in connection with an issuance of Bonds hereunder. It is further provided, however,that notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Bonds shall not be delivered unless prior to delivery, the Bonds have been rated by a nationally recognized rating agency for municipal securities in one (1) of the four (4) highest rating categories for long term obligations, as required by Chapter 1371. SECTION 2. Fully Registered Obligations - Authorized Denominations - Stated Maturities - Interest Rates- Dated Date. The Bonds are issuable in fully registered form only; shall be dated [� [_],2024(the Dated Date); shall be in denominations of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, shall be lettered "R-" and numbered consecutively from One (1) upward; and principal shall become due and payable on July 15 in each of the years and in principal amounts (the Stated Maturities) and bear interest on the unpaid principal amounts from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on [ [_], 2024), or the most recent Interest Payment Date(hereinafter defined)to which interest has been paid or duly provided for,to the earlier of redemption or Stated Maturity,at the rates per annum in accordance with the following schedule: Stated Maturities Jul 15 Principal Amounts ($) Interest Rates(%) 138634808.3 -4- Stated Maturities Jul 15 Principal Amounts (S) Interest Rates (%) The Bonds shall bear interest on the unpaid principal amount thereof at the per annum rates shown above, computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, and interest thereon shall be payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each year(each,an Interest Payment Date),commencing 2025,while the Bonds are Outstanding. SECTION 3. Payment of Bonds-Interest Payments-Paving Agent/Registrar. The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, due and payable by reason of Stated Maturity,redemption, or otherwise, shall be payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts, and such payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be without exchange or collection charges to the Holder(hereinafter defined)of the Bonds. Interest on each Bond issued and delivered to a Holder shall accrue from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on or about [ U,2024)or from the latest Interest Payment Date that interest on such Bond(or its Predecessor Bond)has been paid that precedes the registration date appearing on such Bond in the "Registration Certificate of Paying Agent/Registrar" (Section 8D hereof), unless the registration date appearing thereon is an Interest Payment Date for which interest is being paid, in which case interest on such Bond shall accrue from the registration date appearing thereon and provided further that with respect to the initial payment of interest on a Bond. The selection and appointment of [ 11 1�, Texas, to serve as the initial Paying Agent/Registrar(the Paying Agent/Registrar)for the Bonds is hereby approved and confirmed,and the City agrees and covenants to cause to be kept and maintained at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar books and records(the Security Register)for the registration,payment,and transfer of the Bonds, all as provided herein, in accordance with the terms and provisions of a Paying Agent/Registrar 138634808.3 -5- Agreement, attached, in substantially final form, as Exhibit A hereto, and such reasonable rules and regulations as the Paying Agent/Registrar and the City may prescribe. The City covenants to maintain and provide a Paying Agent/Registrar at all times while the Bonds are Outstanding, and any successor Paying Agent/Registrar shall be (i) a national or state banking institution or (ii) an association or a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the United States of America or of any state, authorized under such laws to exercise trust powers. Such Paying Agent/Registrar shall be subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authority and authorized by law to serve as a Paying Agent/Registrar. The City reserves the right to appoint a successor Paying Agent/Registrar upon providing the previous Paying Agent/Registrar with a certified copy of a resolution or ordinance terminating such agency. Additionally,the City agrees to promptly cause a written notice of this substitution to be sent to each Holder of the Bonds by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid,which notice shall also give the address of the new Paying Agent/Registrar. Both principal of,premium,if any, and interest on the Bonds,due and payable by reason of Stated Maturity, redemption or otherwise, shall be payable only to the registered owner of the Bonds appearing on the Security Register (the Holder or Holders) maintained on behalf of the City by the Paying Agent/Registrar as hereinafter provided(i)on the Record Date (defined herein)for purposes of payment of interest thereon and(ii)on the date of surrender of the Bonds for purposes of receiving payment of principal thereof at the Bonds' Stated Maturity or upon prior redemption of the Bonds. The City and the Paying Agent/Registrar, and any agent of either, shall treat the Holder as the owner of a Bond for purposes of receiving payment and all other purposes whatsoever, and neither the City nor the Paying Agent/Registrar, or any agent of either, shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Principal of, and premium, if any, on the Bonds shall be payable only upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds to the Paying Agent/Registrar at its corporate trust office. Interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the Holder whose name appears in the Security Register at the close of business on the last business day of the month next preceding an Interest Payment Date for the Bonds (the Record Date) and shall be paid (i)by check sent by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, by the Paying Agent/Registrar,to the address of the Holder appearing in the Security Register or(ii)by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar, requested in writing by the Holder at the Holder's risk and expense. While the Bonds are held by the Purchaser,payment of principal of,premium,if any,and interest on the Bonds shall be made by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser, to an account at a financial institution located in the United States designated by the Purchaser. If the date for the payment of the principal of,premium, if any,or interest on the Bonds shall be a Saturday, Sunday, a legal holiday, or a day on which banking institutions in the city where the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar is located are authorized by law or executive order to close,then the date for such payment shall be the next succeeding day which is not such a day. The payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made on the original date any such payment on the Bonds was due. In the event of a non-payment of interest on a scheduled payment date, and for thirty (30) days thereafter, a new record date for such interest payment(a Special Record Date)will be established by the Paying Agent/Registrar, if and when funds for the payment of such interest have been received from the City. Notice of the Special Record Date and of the scheduled payment date of the past due interest (the Special Payment Date-which shall be fifteen(15)days after the Special Record Date)shall be sent at least five (5) business days prior to the Special Record Date by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the address of each Holder appearing on the Security Register at the close of business on the last business day next preceding the date of mailing of such notice. 138634808.3 -6- SECTION 4. Redemption. A. Special Mandatory Redemption. In the event that the Purchaser at such time remains the sole holder of the Bonds and the final accounting delivered by the City to the Purchaser in the form and manner specified in Section 29 of this Ordinance evidences that the total cost of the project or projects to be financed with Bond proceeds is less than the amount of Bond proceeds available for paying such costs or if the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser disapproves construction of any portion of such project or projects as not being in accordance with the plans and specifications, then the City shall, unless an alternative is permitted under Section 29 hereof, immediately, with the filing of the final accounting, redeem Bonds in the amount of such excess and/or cost determined by the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser relating to the parts of such project or projects not built in accordance with the plans and specifications, to the nearest multiple of the authorized denomination for the Bonds. Bonds redeemed pursuant to this provision shall be redeemable on any date, as a whole or in part, in principal amounts of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity, selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar), at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. B. Optional Redemption. The Bonds having Stated Maturities on and after July 15, 20U shall be subject to redemption prior to Stated Maturity, at the option of the City,on July 15,20U,or any date thereafter,as a whole or in part,in principal amounts of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar), at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. C. Exercise of Redemption Option. At least forty-five (45) days prior to a date set for the redemption of Bonds (unless a shorter notification period shall be satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar),the City shall notify the Paying Agent/Registrar of its decision to exercise the right,or of the requirement, as applicable, to redeem Bonds, the principal amount of each Stated Maturity to be redeemed, and the date set for the redemption thereof. The decision of the City to exercise the right to redeem Bonds shall be entered in the minutes of the City Council. D. Selection of Bonds for Redemption. If less than all Outstanding Bonds of the same Stated Maturity are to be redeemed on a redemption date, the Paying Agent/Registrar shall select at random and by lot the Bonds to be redeemed, provided that if less than the entire principal amount of a Bond is to be redeemed,the Paying Agent/Registrar shall treat such Bond then subject to redemption as representing the number of Bonds Outstanding which is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Bond by$5,000. E. Notice of Redemption. Not less than thirty (30) days prior to a redemption date for the Bonds, a notice of redemption shall be sent by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid,in the name of the City and at the City's expense, by the Paying Agent/Registrar to each Holder of a Bond to be redeemed, in whole or in part, at the address of the Holder appearing on the Security Register at the close of business on the business day next preceding the date of mailing such notice,and any notice of redemption so mailed shall be conclusively presumed to have been duly given irrespective of whether received by the Holder. This notice may also be published once in a financial publication,journal, or reporter of general circulation among securities dealers in the City of New York,New York(including,but not limited to, The Bond Buyer and The Wall Street Journal),or in the State of Texas(including,but not limited to, The Texas Bond Reporter). All notices of redemption shall (i)specify the date of redemption for the Bonds, (ii)identify the Bonds to be redeemed and, in the case of a portion of the principal amount to be redeemed, the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, (iii) state the redemption price, (iv) state that the Bonds, or the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, shall become due and payable on the redemption date specified, and the interest thereon, or on the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, shall 138634808.3 -7- cease to accrue from and after the redemption date, and (v) specify that payment of the redemption price for the Bonds,or the principal amount thereof to be redeemed,shall be made at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar only upon presentation and surrender thereof by the Holder. If a Bond is subject by its terms to redemption and has been called for redemption and notice of redemption thereof has been duly given or waived as herein provided, such Bond (or the principal amount thereof to be redeemed) so called for redemption shall become due and payable,and if money sufficient for the payment of such Bonds (or of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed) at the then applicable redemption price is held for the purpose of such payment by the Paying Agent/Registrar, then on the redemption date designated in such notice,interest on said Bonds(or the principal amount thereof to be redeemed)called for redemption shall cease to accrue, and such Bonds shall not be deemed to be Outstanding in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. F. Transfer/Exchange. Neither the City nor the Paying Agent/Registrar shall be required(i)to transfer or exchange any Bond during a period beginning forty-five (45) days prior to the date fixed for redemption of the Bonds or (ii)to transfer or exchange any Bond selected for redemption, provided; however,such limitation of transfer shall not be applicable to an exchange by the Holder of the unredeemed balance of a Bond which is subject to redemption in part. SECTION 5. Execution-Registration. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by its Mayor, its seal reproduced or impressed thereon, and attested by the City Secretary, or designee. The signature of either officer on the Bonds may be manual or facsimile. Bonds bearing the manual or facsimile signatures of individuals who were, at the time of the Dated Date,the proper officers of the City shall bind the City,notwithstanding that such individuals or either of them shall cease to hold such offices prior to the delivery of the Bonds to the Purchasers (defined herein), all as authorized and provided in Chapter 1201, as amended,Texas Government Code. No Holder of a Bond shall be entitled to any right or benefit under this Ordinance, or be valid or obligatory for any purpose, unless there appears on such Bond either a certificate of registration substantially in the form provided in Section 8C, executed by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas or his duly authorized agent by manual signature for the Initial Bond only,or a certificate of registration substantially in the form provided in Section 8D for Bonds other than the Initial Bond,executed by the Paying Agent/Registrar by manual signature, and either such certificate upon any Bond shall be conclusive evidence, and the only evidence, that such Bond has been duly certified or registered and delivered. SECTION 6. Registration - Transfer - Exchange of Bonds - Predecessor Bonds. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall obtain,record, and maintain in the Security Register the name and address of every owner of the Bonds, or, if appropriate, the nominee thereof. Any Bond may, in accordance with its terms and the terms hereof, be transferred or exchanged for Bonds of other authorized denominations upon the Security Register by the Holder,in person or by his duly authorized agent,upon surrender of such Bond to the Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation,accompanied by a written instrument of transfer or request for exchange duly executed by the Holder or by his duly authorized agent, in form satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar, the City shall execute and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall register and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of authorized denomination and having the same Stated Maturity and of a like interest rate and aggregate principal amount as the Bond or Bonds surrendered for transfer. 138634808.3 -g- At the option of the Holder, Bonds may be exchanged for other Bonds and of authorized denominations and having the same Stated Maturity,bearing the same rate of interest and of like aggregate principal amount as the Bonds surrendered for exchange upon surrender of the Bonds to be exchanged at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar. Whenever any Bonds are so surrendered for exchange, the City shall execute, and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall register and deliver, the Bonds, to the Holder requesting the exchange. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be delivered at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar, or be sent by registered mail to the Holder at his request, risk, and expense, and upon the delivery thereof, the same shall be the valid and binding obligations of the City, evidencing the same obligation to pay,and entitled to the same benefits under this Ordinance,as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. All transfers or exchanges of Bonds pursuant to this Section shall be made without expense or service charge to the Holder, except as otherwise herein provided, and except that the Paying Agent/Registrar shall require payment by the Holder requesting such transfer or exchange of any fee, tax or other governmental charges required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. Bonds canceled by reason of an exchange or transfer pursuant to the provisions hereof are hereby defined to be Predecessor Bonds,evidencing all or a portion,as the case may be,of the same debt evidenced by the new Bond or Bonds registered and delivered in the exchange or transfer therefor. Additionally,the term Predecessor Bonds shall include any Bond registered and delivered pursuant to Section 27 in lieu of a mutilated, lost, destroyed, or stolen Bond which shall be deemed to evidence the same obligation as the mutilated,lost,destroyed,or stolen Bond. SECTION 7. Initial Bond. The Bonds herein authorized shall be issued initially either (i) as a single fully-registered Bond in the total principal amount of with principal installments to become due and payable as provided in Section 2 and numbered T-1,or(ii) as one(1)fully-registered Bond for each year of Stated Maturity in the applicable principal amount and denomination and to be numbered consecutively from T-I and upward(the Initial Bond)and,in either case,the Initial Bond shall be registered in the name of the initial purchasers or the designee thereof. The Initial Bond shall be the Bond submitted to the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas for approval, certified and registered by the Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas and delivered to the initial purchasers. Any time after the delivery of the Initial Bond, the Paying Agent/Registrar shall cancel the Initial Bond delivered hereunder and exchange therefor definitive Bonds of authorized denominations, Stated Maturities,principal amounts and bearing applicable interest rates for transfer and delivery to the Holders named at the addresses identified therefor; all pursuant to and in accordance with such written instructions from the initial purchasers, or the designee thereof, and such other information and documentation as the Paying Agent/Registrar may reasonably require. SECTION 8. Forms. A. Forms Generally. The Bonds, the Registration Certificate of the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas,the Certificate of Paying Agent/Registrar, and the form of Assignment to be printed on each of the Bonds shall be substantially in the forms set forth in this Section with such appropriate insertions, omissions, substitutions, and other variations as are permitted or required by this Ordinance and may have such letters, numbers, or other marks of identification (including insurance legends in the event the Bonds, or any Stated Maturities thereof, are insured and identifying numbers and letters of the Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures of the American Bankers Association) and such legends and endorsements (including any reproduction of an opinion of Bond Counsel (hereinafter referenced)) thereon as may, consistent herewith, be established by the City or 138634808.3 -9- determined by the officers executing the Bonds as evidenced by their execution thereof Any portion of the text of any Bond may be set forth on the reverse thereof,with an appropriate reference thereto on the face of the Bond. The definitive Bonds shall be printed,lithographed,or engraved,produced by any combination of these methods, or produced in any other similar manner, all as determined by the officers executing the Bonds as evidenced by their execution thereof, but the Initial Bond submitted to the Attorney General of Texas may be typewritten or photocopied or otherwise reproduced. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138634808.3 -10- B. Form of Definitive Bond. REGISTERED REGISTERED PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NO. $ United States of America State of Texas Counties of Nueces,Aransas,Kleberg, and San Patricio CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2024[C] Dated Date: Interest Rate: Stated Maturity: CUSIP NO: [ ] [_], 2024 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS The City of Corpus Christi,Texas(the City),a body corporate and a municipal corporation located in the Counties of Nueces, Aransas, Kleberg, and San Patricio, State of Texas, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of the Registered Owner specified above, or the registered assigns thereof,on the Stated Maturity date specified above,the Principal Amount specified above (or so much thereof as shall not have been paid upon prior redemption),and to pay interest on the unpaid Principal Amount hereof from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on [] U, 2024)or from the most recent Interest Payment Date (hereinafter defined)to which interest has been paid or duly provided for,to the earlier of redemption or Stated Maturity, at the per annum rate of interest specified above computed on the basis of a 360-day year of 30-day months;such interest being payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year(each,an Interest Payment Date),commencing [] ",20[_]. Principal and premium, if any, of the Bond shall be payable to the Registered Owner hereof(the Holder) upon presentation and surrender, at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar executing the registration certificate appearing hereon or a successor thereof. Interest shall be payable to the Holder of this Bond (or one or more Predecessor Bonds, as defined in the Ordinance hereinafter referenced)whose name appears on the Security Register maintained by the Paying Agent/Registrar at the close of business on the Record Date, which is the last business day of the month next preceding each Interest Payment Date. All payments of principal of,premium,if any,and interest on this Bond shall be in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts. Interest shall be paid by the Paying Agent/Registrar by check sent on the appropriate date of payment by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid,to the Holder hereof at the address appearing in the Security Register or by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar, requested by the Holder hereof at the Holder's risk and expense. While the Bonds are held by the Purchaser, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser,to an account at a financial institution located in the United States designated by the Purchaser. This Bond is one of the series specified in its title issued in the aggregate principal amount of $[ ] (the Bonds) pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the governing body of the City (the Ordinance), for the purpose of (i) designing, planning, building, improving, extending, enlarging, and repairing the System, and (ii)paying the costs of issuance related thereto, all in conformity with the laws 138634808.3 _11- of the State of Texas,particularly the City's Home Rule Charter and the Act,and the Ordinance. The Bonds shall be payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is on parity with the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations and that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations. The Bonds stated to mature on and after July 15, 20" may be redeemed prior to their Stated Maturities, at the option of the City, on July 15, 20U or on any date, in whole or in part in principal amounts of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar) at the redemption price of par, together with accrued interest to the date of redemption. In the event that the Purchaser at such time remains the sole holder of the Bonds and the final accounting delivered by the City to the Purchaser in the form and manner specified in the Ordinance evidences that the total cost of the project to be financed with Bond proceeds is less than the amount of Bond proceeds available for paying such costs or if the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser disapproves construction of any portion of such project or projects as not being in accordance with the plans and specifications, then the City shall, unless the Ordinance permits another use of such excess funds, immediately,with the filing of the final accounting,redeem Bonds in the amount of such excess and/or cost determined by the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser relating to the parts of such project or projects not built in accordance with the plans and specifications to the nearest multiple of the authorized denomination for the Bonds. Bonds redeemed pursuant to this provision shall be redeemable on any date, as a whole or in part,in principal amounts of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof(and if within a Stated Maturity, selected at random and by lot by the Paying Agent/Registrar),at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. If this Bond(or any portion of the principal sum hereof)shall have been duly called for redemption and notice of such redemption duly given,then upon such redemption date this Bond(or the portion of the principal sum hereof to be redeemed) shall become due and payable, and, if money for the payment of the redemption price and the interest accrued on the principal amount to be redeemed to the date of redemption is held for the purpose of such payment by the Paying Agent/Registrar,interest shall cease to accrue and be payable hereon from and after the redemption date on the principal amount hereof to be redeemed. In the event of a partial redemption of the principal amount of this Bond,payment of the redemption price of such principal amount shall be made to the registered owner only upon presentation and surrender of this Bond to the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar and,there shall be issued to the registered owner hereof, without charge, a new Bond or Bonds of like maturity and interest rate in any authorized denominations provided in the Ordinance for the then unredeemed balance of the principal sum hereof. If this Bond is called for redemption, in whole or in part,the City or the Paying Agent/Registrar shall not be required to issue, transfer, or exchange this Bond within forty-five (45) days of the date fixed for redemption; provided, however, such limitation of transfer shall not be applicable to an exchange by the Holder of the unredeemed balance hereof in the event of its redemption in part. The Bonds of this series are special obligations of the City, issued as Senior Lien Obligations, payable from and equally and ratably secured by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, being (primarily)a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues derived from the operation of the City's combined utility systems (as further described in the Ordinance, the System), that is on parity with the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations and that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations. In the Ordinance,the City reserves and retains the right to issue Additional Senior Lien Obligations, Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations without limitation as to principal amount but subject to any terms, conditions, or restrictions 138634808.3 -12- set forth in the Ordinance or as may be applicable thereto under law or otherwise. The Bonds do not constitute a legal or equitable pledge,charge,lien,or encumbrance upon any property of the City or System, except with respect to the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. The Holder hereof shall never have the right to demand payment of this obligation out of any funds raised or to be raised by taxation. Reference is hereby made to the Ordinance, a copy of which is on file in the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar, and to all of the provisions of which the Holder by his acceptance hereof hereby assents, for definitions of terms; the description and nature of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues pledged for the payment of the Bonds;the terms and conditions under which the City may issue Additional Senior Lien Obligations,Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations,and Inferior Lien Obligations;the terms and conditions relating to the transfer or exchange of the Bonds; the conditions upon which the Ordinance may be amended or supplemented with or without the consent of the Holders; the rights, duties, and obligations of the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar;the terms and provisions upon which this Bond may be redeemed or discharged at or prior to the Stated Maturity thereof, and deemed to be no longer Outstanding thereunder; and for the other terms and provisions specified in the Ordinance. Capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings assigned in the Ordinance. This Bond, subject to certain limitations contained in the Ordinance, may be transferred on the Security Register upon presentation and surrender at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent/Registrar,duly endorsed by,or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar duly executed by the Holder hereof, or his duly authorized agent, and thereupon one or more new fully registered Bonds of the same Stated Maturity, of authorized denominations,bearing the same rate of interest,and of the same aggregate principal amount will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees. The City and the Paying Agent/Registrar, and any agent of either, shall treat the Holder hereof whose name appears on the Security Register(i)on the Record Date as the owner hereof for purposes of receiving payment of interest hereon, (ii)on the date of surrender of this Bond as the owner hereof for purposes of receiving payment of principal hereof at its Stated Maturity, or its redemption, in whole or in part, and (iii)on any other date as the owner hereof for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Paying Agent/Registrar,or any such agent of either,shall be affected by notice to the contrary. In the event of a non-payment of interest on a scheduled payment date, and for thirty (30)days thereafter, a new record date for such interest payment(a Special Record Date)will be established by the Paying Agent/Registrar, if and when funds for the payment of such interest have been received from the City. Notice of the Special Record Date and of the scheduled payment date of the past due interest(the Special Payment Date-which shall be fifteen(15)days after the Special Record Date)shall be sent at least five (5)business days prior to the Special Record Date by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the address of each Holder appearing on the Security Register at the close of business on the last business day next preceding the date of mailing of such notice. It is hereby certified, covenanted, and represented that all acts, conditions, and things required to be performed,exist, and be done precedent to the issuance of this Bond in order to render the same a legal, valid,and binding special obligation of the City have been performed,exist,and have been done,in regular and due time, form, and manner, as required by law, and that issuance of the Bonds does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation; and that due provision has been made for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds by a pledge of and lien on the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. In case any provision in this Bond or any application thereof shall be deemed invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions and applications shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. The terms and provisions of this Bond and the Ordinance shall be construed in accordance with and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. 138634808.3 -13- [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank] 138634808.3 -14- IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Bond has been signed with the imprinted or lithographed facsimile signature of the Mayor of the City,attested by the imprinted or lithographed facsimile signature of the City Secretary, and the official seal of the City has been duly affixed to, printed, lithographed or impressed on this Bond. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (SEAL) [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138634808.3 -15- C. Form of Registration Certificate of Comptroller of Public Accounts to Appear on Initial Bond Only. REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF H PUBLIC ACCOUNTS H REGISTER NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Bond has been examined, certified as to validity and approved by the Attorney General of the State of Texas, and duly registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas. WITNESS my signature and seal of office this Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas (SEAL) *Note to Printer:Not to appear on printed Bonds D. Form of Certificate of Paying Agent/Registrar to Appear on Definitive Bonds Only. CERTIFICATE OF PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR This Bond has been duly issued under the provisions of the within-mentioned Ordinance;the Bond or Bonds of the above-entitled and designated series originally delivered having been approved by the Attorney General of the State of Texas and registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts, as shown by the records of the Paying Agent/Registrar. Registered this date: 1J 11 TEXAS, as Paying Agent/Registrar By: Authorized Signature * Note to Printer: to appear on printed Bonds E. Form of Assignment. ASSIGNMENT 138634808.3 -16- FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns, and transfers unto (Print or typewrite name, address, and zip code of transferee): (Social Security or other identifying number): the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof,with full power of substitution in the premises. DATED: NOTICE: The signature on this assignment must correspond with the name of the registered owner as it appears on the face of the within Bond in every particular. Signature guaranteed: [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138634808.3 -17- F. Form of Initial Bond. The Initial Bond shall be in the form set forth in paragraph B of this Section,except that the form of a single fully registered Initial Bond shall be modified as follows: (1) immediately under the name of the Bond(s) the headings "Interest Rate" and "Stated Maturity" shall both be completed"as shown below"; (2) the first two paragraphs shall read as follows: The City of Corpus Christi,Texas(the City),a body corporate and a municipal corporation located in the Counties of Nueces, Aransas, Kleberg, and San Patricio, State of Texas, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of the Registered Owner named above, or the registered assigns thereof, the Principal Amount specified above on the fifteenth day of July in each of the years and in principal amounts and bearing interest at per annum rates in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Principal Interest Stated Maturity Amounts M Rates (Information to be inserted from schedule in Section 2 hereof). (or so much thereof as shall not have been paid upon prior redemption) and to pay interest on the unpaid Principal Amount hereof from the Closing Date (anticipated to occur on [] [_],20[x), or from the most recent Interest Payment Date(hereinafter defined)to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, to the earlier of redemption or Stated Maturity, at the per annum rate of interest specified above computed on the basis of a 360-day year of 30-day months; such interest being payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year(each, an Interest Payment Date),commencing [] [_],20[_]. Principal of this Bond shall be payable to the Registered Owner hereof (the Holder), upon its presentation and surrender, at the corporate trust office of [ ], [], Texas (the Paying Agent/Registrar). Interest shall be payable to the Holder of this Bond whose name appears on the Security Register maintained by the Paying Agent/Registrar at the close of business on the Record Date, which is the last business day of the month next preceding each interest payment date. All payments of principal of and interest on this Bond shall be in any coin or currency of the United States of America which at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts. Interest shall be paid by the Paying Agent/Registrar by check sent on or prior to the appropriate date of payment by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the Holder hereof at the address appearing in the Security Register or by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar,requested by, and at the risk and expense of, the Holder hereof. While the Bonds are held by the Purchaser, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser, to an account at a financial institution located in the United States designated by the Purchaser. [END OF FORMS] G. Insurance Legend. If bond insurance is obtained by the Purchasers or the City for the Bonds,the definitive Bonds and the Initial Bond shall bear an appropriate legend as provided by the bond insurer,to appear under the following header: [BOND INSURANCE] SECTION 9. Definitions. For all purposes of this Ordinance, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires: (i)the terms defined in this Section have the meanings assigned to them in this Section, and certain terms used in Sections 32 and 46 of this Ordinance have the 138634808.3 _18- meanings assigned to them in such Sections, and all such terms include the plural as well as the singular; (ii) all references in this Ordinance to designated "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Sections and other subdivisions of this Ordinance as originally adopted; and (iii)the words "herein", "hereof', and"hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Ordinance as a whole and not to any particular Section or other subdivision. A. The term Accountant shall mean a nationally recognized independent certified public accountant,or an independent firm of certified public accountants. B. The term Additional Senior Lien Obligations shall mean(i) any bonds,notes,warrants,or any similar obligations hereafter issued by the City that are payable wholly or in part from and equally and ratably secured by a lien and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, such pledge to include a pledge of Net Revenues that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof that is or will be pledged to the payment of any Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Inferior Lien Obligations now Outstanding or hereafter issued by the City, and (ii)obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues (including the Previously Issued Parity Obligations), as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. C. The term Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations shall mean (i) any bonds, notes, warrants,or any similar obligations hereafter issued by the City that are payable wholly or in part from and equally and ratably secured by a lien and pledge of the Net Revenues, such pledge being subordinate and inferior to the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is included in Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, but senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof that is or will be pledged to the payment of the Inferior Lien Obligations now Outstanding or hereafter issued by the City, and on parity with the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues securing the payment of the then-Outstanding Subordinate Lien Obligations and (ii)obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured by such subordinate and inferior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. D. The term Approval Certificate shall mean a written instrument from time to time executed by the Pricing Officer in accordance with Section I of this Ordinance. E. The term Authorized Oficial shall mean the City Manager, each Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, Director of Finance and Procurement, City Secretary, and City Attorney of the City. F. The term Average Annual Debt Service Requirements shall mean that average amount which, at the time of computation, will be required to pay the Debt Service Requirements of obligations when due and derived by dividing the total of such Debt Service Requirements by the number of years then remaining before final Stated Maturity. The calculation of Average Annual Debt Service Requirements shall be net of(1) capitalized interest from bond proceeds and (2) the receipt or anticipated receipt of a refundable tax credit or similar payment relating to a series of Senior Lien Obligations irrevocably 138634808.3 -19- designated as refundable tax credit bonds, which payment shall be treated as one offset to regularly scheduled debt service of the series of Senior Lien Obligations to which it relates. G. The term Bonds shall mean the $[ ] "CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM SENIOR LIEN REVENUE IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2024[C]", dated ] [�,20[1, authorized by this Ordinance. H. The term Bond Fund shall mean the special Fund or account created and established by the provisions of Section 13 of this Ordinance. I. The term Capital Additions shall mean a reservoir or other water storage facilities, a water or wastewater treatment plant or an interest therein,an electric generation facility and/or distribution system or an interest therein, a gas distribution system or an interest therein and associated transmission facilities with respect to each and any combination thereof,which shall become a part of the System. J. The term Capital Improvements shall mean any capital extensions, improvements and betterments to the System other than Capital Additions. K. The term City shall mean the City of Corpus Christi, Texas and, where appropriate, the City Council of the City. L. The term Closing Date shall mean the date of physical delivery of the Initial Bond in exchange for the payment in full by the Purchasers. M. The term Credit Agreement shall mean a loan agreement, revolving credit agreement, agreement establishing a line of credit, letter of credit, reimbursement agreement, insurance contract, commitments to purchase Debt, purchase or sale agreements, interest rate swap agreements, or commitments or other contracts or agreements authorized,recognized,and approved by the City as a Credit Agreement in connection with the authorization,issuance,security,or payment of any obligation authorized by Chapter 1371,as amended,Texas Government Code, and which includes any Credit Facility. N. The term Credit Facility shall mean (i)a policy of insurance or a surety bond,issued by an issuer of policies of insurance insuring the timely payment of debt service on governmental obligations,or (ii) a letter or line of credit issued by any financial institution. O. The term Credit Provider shall mean any bank, financial institution, insurance company, surety bond provider, or other institution which provides, executes, issues, or otherwise is a party to or provider of a Credit Agreement or Credit Facility. P. The term Debt shall mean (1) all indebtedness payable from Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues incurred or assumed by the City for borrowed money (including indebtedness payable from Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues arising under Credit Agreements) and all other financing obligations of the System payable from Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are shown on the liability side of a balance sheet; and (2) all other indebtedness payable from Senior Lien Pledged Revenues and/or Net Revenues (except indebtedness not treated as Debt hereunder) for borrowed money or for the acquisition,construction,or improvement of property or capitalized lease obligations pertaining to 138634808.3 -20- the System that is guaranteed, directly or indirectly, in any manner by the City, or that is in effect guaranteed, directly or indirectly, by the City through an agreement, contingent or otherwise, to purchase any such indebtedness or to advance or supply funds for the payment or purchase of any such indebtedness or to purchase property or services primarily for the purpose of enabling the debtor or seller to make payment of such indebtedness,or to assure the owner of the indebtedness against loss, or to supply funds to or in any other manner invest in the debtor (including any agreement to pay for property or services irrespective of whether or not such property is delivered or such services are rendered),or otherwise. For the purpose of determining Debt,there shall be excluded any particular Debt if,upon or prior to the maturity thereof,there shall have been deposited with the proper depository(i)in trust the necessary funds(or investments that will provide sufficient funds,if permitted by the instrument creating such Debt) for the payment, redemption, or satisfaction of such Debt or (ii) evidence of such Debt deposited for cancellation; and thereafter it shall not be considered Debt. No item shall be considered Debt unless such item constitutes indebtedness under generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with the financial statements of the System in prior Fiscal Years. Q. The term Debt Service Requirements shall mean, as of any particular date of computation, with respect to any obligations and with respect to any period,the aggregate of the amounts to be paid or set aside by the City as of such date or in such period for the payment of the principal of,premium, if any, and interest(to the extent not capitalized)on such obligations; assuming,in the case of obligations without a fixed numerical rate, that such obligations bear interest calculated by assuming (i) that the interest rate for every 12-month period on such bonds is equal to the rate of interest reported in the most recently published edition of The Bond Buyer (or its successor) at the time of calculation as the "Revenue Bond Index"or,if such Revenue Bond Index is no longer being maintained by The Bond Buyer(or its successor) at the time of calculation, such interest rate shall be assumed to be 80% of the rate of interest then being paid on United States Treasury obligations of like maturity and (ii)that,in the case of bonds not subject to fixed scheduled mandatory sinking fund redemptions, that the principal of such bonds is amortized such that annual debt service is substantially level over the remaining stated life of such bonds or in the manner permitted under Section 1371.057(c), as amended, Texas Government Code as the same relates to interim or non—permanent indebtedness, and in the case of obligations required to be redeemed or prepaid as to principal prior to Stated Maturity according to a fixed schedule, the principal amounts thereof will be redeemed prior to Stated Maturity in accordance with the mandatory redemption provisions applicable thereto (in each case notwithstanding any contingent obligation to redeem bonds more rapidly). For the term of any Credit Agreement in the form of an interest rate hedge agreement entered into in connection with any such obligations, Debt Service Requirements shall be computed by netting the amounts payable to the City under such hedge agreement from the amounts payable by the City under such hedge agreement and such obligations. R. The term Depository shall mean an official depository bank of the City. S. The term Engineer shall mean an individual, firm, or corporation engaged in the engineering profession,being a registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Texas,having specific experience with respect to a combined municipal utility system similar to the System and such individual, firm,or corporation may be employed by,or may be an employee of,the City. T. The term Fiscal Year shall mean the twelve month accounting period used by the City in connection with the operation of the System which may be any twelve consecutive month period established 138634808.3 -21- by the City,presently being that period commencing on October I of each year and ending on the following September 30. U. The term Government Securities shall mean: (i)direct noncallable obligations of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America, or (ii) noncallable obligations of an agency or instrumentality of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the agency or instrumentality and that,on the date the governing body of the issuer adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds,are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than AAA or its equivalent. When the Previously Issued Parity Obligations issued on or before August 25, 2016, are no longer Outstanding, the term Government Securities, as used herein, shall mean (i) direct noncallable obligations of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America; (ii) noncallable obligations of an agency or instrumentality of the United States, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the agency or instrumentality and that, on the date the governing body of the issuer adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds,are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than AAA or its equivalent; (iii)noncallable obligations of a state or an agency or a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of a state that have been refunded and that, on the date the governing body of the issuer adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds, are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than AAA or its equivalent; or(iv) any additional securities and obligations hereafter authorized by the laws of the State of Texas as eligible for use to accomplish the discharge of obligations such as the Bonds. V. The term Gross Revenues shall mean all revenues,income,and receipts derived or received by the City from the operation and ownership of the System, including the interest income from the investment or deposit of money in any Fund created or confirmed by this Ordinance or maintained by the City in connection with the System, other than those amounts subject to payment to the United States of America as rebate pursuant to section 148 of the Code. W. The term Holder or Holders shall mean the registered owner, whose name appears in the Security Register, for any Bond. X. The term Inferior Lien Obligations shall mean(i) any bonds,notes,warrants,or any similar obligations hereafter issued by the City that are payable wholly or in part from and equally and ratably secured by a lien and pledge of the Net Revenues,which pledge is subordinate and inferior to the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is included in Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,that is or will be pledged to the payment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations,and that is on parity with the lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues securing the payment of the then-Outstanding Inferior Lien Obligations and (ii)obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured by such subordinate and inferior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. Y. The term Interest Payment Date shall mean the date semiannual interest is payable on the Bonds, being January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing 20U, while any of the Bonds remain Outstanding. Z. The term Net Revenues shall mean all Gross Revenues less Operating Expenses. AA. The term Operating Expenses shall mean the expenses of operation and maintenance of the System,including all salaries,labor,materials,repairs,and extensions necessary to render efficient service; provided, however, that only such repairs and extensions, as in the judgment of the City, reasonably and 138634808.3 -22- fairly exercised by the passage of appropriate ordinances, are necessary to render adequate service,or such as might be necessary to meet some physical accident or condition which would otherwise impair any Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, Inferior Lien Obligations, or other Debt of the System. Operating Expenses shall include the purchase of water, sewer and gas services as received from other entities and the expenses related thereto and,to the extent permitted by a change in law (and receipt of an opinion as to legality from a firm of nationally recognized bond counsel), Operating Expenses may include payments made on or in respect of obtaining and maintaining any Credit Facility. Operating Expenses shall never include any allowance for depreciation,property retirement,depletion,obsolescence, and other items not requiring an outlay of cash and any interest on the Bonds or any Debt. BB. The term Ordinance shall mean this Ordinance adopted by the City Council on January 30, 2024 authorizing the issuance of the Bonds. CC. The term Outstanding shall mean when used in this Ordinance with respect to all Debt means, as of the date of determination, all Debt except: (1) those Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations canceled by the Paying Agent/Registrar or delivered to the Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation; (2) those Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations for which payment has been duly provided by the City in accordance with the provisions of Section 34 of this Ordinance; and (3) those Senior Lien Obligations, Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations that have been mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen and replacement Bonds have been registered and delivered in lieu thereof as provided in Section 27 of this Ordinance. DD. The term Paying Agent/Registrar shall mean the financial institution specified in Section 3 of this Ordinance,or its herein-permitted successors and assigns. EE. The term Previously Issued Parity Obligations shall mean, as of the Closing Date the Outstanding and unpaid obligations of the City that are payable solely from and equally and ratably secured by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues of the System that is superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Subordinate Lien Obligations and Inferior Lien Obligations,identified as follows: (1) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2012",dated November 15,2012,in the original principal amount of$69,085,000; (2) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2012",dated November 15,2012,in the original principal amount of$155,660,000; (3) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015",dated July 1,2015,in the original principal amount of$46,990,000; (4) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A",dated March 1,2015,in the original principal amount of$93,600,000; (5) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2015C",dated July 1,2015,in the original principal amount of$101,385,000; 138634808.3 -23- (6) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016",dated August 1,2016,in the original principal amount of$80,415,000; (7) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017',dated March 15,2017,in the original principal amount of$51,215,000; (8) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2017',dated October 1,2017,in the original principal amount of$2,750,000; (9) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue and Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2019",dated September 15, 2019,in the original principal amount of$93,425,000; (10) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2020A", dated July 15, 2020, in the original principal amount of $133,765,000; (11) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Taxable Series 202013", dated July 15, 2020, in the original principal amount of $183,635,000; (12) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, New Series 2020C", dated November 1, 2020, in the original principal amount of $11,425,000; (13) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Notes,Taxable New Series 2021A",dated April 1,2021,in the original principal amount of$35,000,000; (14) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2022A",dated June 15,2022,in the original principal amount of$3,561,000; (15) "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 202213",dated July 15,2022,in the original principal amount of$92,465,000; (16) "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2023", dated July 20, 2023, in the original principal amount of $138,320,000; and (17) Upon issuance,the Bonds. FF. The term Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations shall mean the "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Subordinate Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2018", dated February 15,2018,in the original principal amount of$34,835,000. GG. The term Pricing Officer shall mean either of the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer,or Director of Finance and Procurement,respectively, of the City (which shall include any person serving in the foregoing capacity on an interim or non-permanent basis). HH. The term Prudent Utility Practice shall mean any of the practices,methods and acts,in the exercise of reasonable judgment,in the light of the facts,including but not limited to the practices,methods and acts engaged in or approved by a significant portion of the public utility industry prior thereto,known 138634808.3 -24- at the time the decision was made,would have been expected to accomplish the desired result at the lowest reasonable cost consistent with reliability, safety and expedition. It is recognized that Prudent Utility Practice is not intended to be limited to the optimum practice,method or act at the exclusion of all others, but rather is a spectrum of possible practices, methods or acts which could have been expected to accomplish the desired result at the lowest reasonable cost consistent with reliability,safety and expedition. In the case of any facility included in the System which is owned in common with one or more other entities, the term "Prudent Utility Practice", as applied to such facility, shall have the meaning set forth in the agreement governing the operation of such facility. II. The term Purchasers shall mean the initial purchaser or purchasers of the Bonds named in Section 28 of this Ordinance. JJ. The term Required Reserve Amount shall have the meaning given such term in Section 14 of this Ordinance. KK. The term Reserve Fund shall have the meaning given such term in Section 14 of this Ordinance. LL. The term Reserve Fund Deposits shall have the meaning given such term in Section 14 of this Ordinance. MM. The term Senior Lien Obligations shall mean(i)the Previously Issued Parity Obligations, (ii) any Additional Senior Lien Obligations, and (iii) obligations hereafter issued to refund any of the foregoing that are payable from and equally and ratably secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,which includes a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations, as determined by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. NN. The term Senior Lien Pledged Revenues shall mean (i) the Net Revenues plus (ii) any additional revenues, income, receipts, or other resources including, without limitation, any grants, donations,or income received or to be received from the United States Government,or any other public or private source,whether pursuant to an agreement or otherwise,which hereafter are pledged by the City to the payment of the Bonds, and at the City's discretion, any Additional Senior Lien Obligations, and excluding those revenues excluded from Gross Revenues. 00. The term Special Project shall mean, to the extent permitted by law, any water, sewer, wastewater reuse, or municipal drainage system property, improvement, or facility declared by the City, upon the recommendation of the City Council, not to be part of the System, for which the costs of acquisition, construction, and installation are paid from proceeds of Special Project Bonds (hereinafter defined)being a financing transaction other than the issuance of bonds payable from ad valorem taxes,Net Revenues, or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, and for which all maintenance and operation expenses are payable from sources other than ad valorem taxes, Net Revenues, or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, but only to the extent that and for so long as all or any part of the revenues or proceeds of which are or will be 138634808.3 -25- pledged to secure the payment or repayment of such costs of acquisition, construction, and installation under such Special Project Bonds. PP. The term Stated Maturity shall mean the annual principal payments of the Bonds payable on July 15 of each year, as set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. QQ. The term Subordinate Lien Obligations shall mean (i) the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations, (ii) any Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, and (iii)any obligations issued to refund the foregoing payable and equally and ratably secured from a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof that is included in Senior Lien Pledged Revenues but superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the payment of the Inferior Lien Obligations, as determined by the City Council in accordance with any applicable law. RR. The term System shall mean and include, whether now existing or hereinafter added, the City's existing combined waterworks system,wastewater disposal system and gas system,together with all future extensions,improvements,enlargements, and additions thereto including,to the extent permitted by law (and to be added at the sole discretion of the City), storm sewer and drainage within the waterworks system, solid waste disposal system, additional utility (including electricity), telecommunications, technology,and any other similar enterprise services,and all replacements,additions,and improvements to any of the foregoing, within or without the City limits; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, and to the extent now or hereafter authorized or permitted by law, the term System shall not include any waterworks, wastewater or gas facilities which are declared by the City to be a Special Project and not a part of the System and which are hereafter acquired or constructed by the City with the proceeds from the issuance of Special Project Bonds, which are hereby defined as being special revenue obligations of the City which are not secured by or payable from all or part of the Net Revenues and/or Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, but which are secured by and payable solely from special contract revenues, or payments received from the City or any other legal entity, or any combination thereof, in connection with such facilities; and such revenues or payments shall not be considered as or constitute Gross Revenues of the System,unless and to the extent otherwise provided in the ordinance or ordinances authorizing the issuance of such Special Project Bonds. SS. The term System Fund shall have the meaning given such term in Section 12 of this Ordinance. SECTION 10. Pledge of Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. A. The City hereby covenants and agrees that the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues of the System are hereby irrevocably pledged to the payment and security of the Senior Lien Obligations, including the establishment and maintenance of the special funds or accounts created for the payment and security thereof, all as hereinafter provided; and it is hereby ordained that the Senior Lien Obligations, and the interest thereon,shall constitute a lien on and pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues and be valid and binding without any physical delivery thereof or further act by the City, and the lien created hereby on the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for the payment and security of the Senior Lien Obligations, shall be,prior in right and claim as to any other indebtedness,liability,or obligation of the City or the System. The Senior Lien Obligations are and will be secured by and payable only from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, and are not secured by or payable from a mortgage or deed of trust on any properties whether real,personal,or mixed,constituting the System. B. Chapter 1208, as amended,Texas Government Code, applies to the issuance of the Bonds and the pledge of Senior Lien Pledged Revenues granted by the City under subsection A of this Section, and such pledge is therefore valid,effective, and perfected. If Texas law is amended at any time while the 138634808.3 -26- Senior Lien Obligations are Outstanding and unpaid such that the pledge of the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues granted by the City is to be subject to the filing requirements of Chapter 9, Texas Business & Commerce Code, then in order to preserve to the registered owners of the Senior Lien Obligations the perfection of the security interest in this pledge, the City Council agrees to take such measures as it determines are reasonable and necessary under Texas law to comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 9, as amended, Texas Business & Commerce Code and enable a filing to perfect the security interest in this pledge to occur. SECTION 11. Rates and Charges. For the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds and in addition to all provisions and covenants in the laws of the State of Texas and in this Ordinance, the City hereby expressly stipulates and agrees,while any of the Senior Lien Obligations are Outstanding,to establish and maintain rates and charges for facilities and services afforded by the System that are reasonably expected, on the basis of available information and experience and with due allowance for contingencies,to produce Gross Revenues in each Fiscal Year sufficient: A. To pay all Operating Expenses, or any expenses required by statute to be a first claim on and charge against the Gross Revenues of the System. B. To produce Net Revenues, together with any other lawfully available funds, equal to at least 1.15 times Average Annual Debt Service Requirements on the then-Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations and to deposit the amounts required to be deposited in any reserve or contingency fund or account created for the payment and security of the Senior Lien Obligations, and any other obligations or evidences of indebtedness issued or incurred that are payable from and secured solely by a first and prior lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues, including the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, that is senior and superior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and the Inferior Lien Obligations; C. To produce Net Revenues, together with any other lawfully available funds, sufficient to pay the amounts that may be deposited in the special funds established for the payment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations; D. To produce Net Revenues, together with any other lawfully available funds, sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Inferior Lien Obligations as the same become due and payable and to deposit the amounts required to be deposited in any reserve or contingency fund or account created for the payment and security of the Inferior Lien Obligations, and any other obligations or evidences of indebtedness issued or incurred that are payable from and secured solely by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues that is subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Senior Lien Obligations, and the Subordinate Lien Obligations; and E. To pay, together with any other lawfully available funds, any other legally incurred Debt payable from the Net Revenues of the System and/or secured by a lien on any part of the System. The determination of the amount of principal of and interest on any obligations identified in this Section for the purpose of confirming the sufficiency of System rates and charges shall be made after giving consideration as an offset to debt service the receipt or anticipated receipt of a refundable tax credit or similar payment relating to any series of obligations irrevocably designated as refundable tax credit bonds pursuant to the City ordinance authorizing their issuance or otherwise relating thereto. SECTION 12. System Fund. The City hereby covenants, agrees, and ratifies its prior covenants and agreements that the Gross Revenues of the System shall be deposited, as collected and received,into a separate Fund or account (previously created and established and to be maintained with the Depository) 138634808.3 -27- known as the "City of Corpus Christi,Texas Utility System Revenue Fund"(the System Fund)and that the Gross Revenues of the System shall be kept separate and apart from all other funds of the City. All Gross Revenues deposited into the System Fund shall be pledged and appropriated to the extent required for the following uses and in the order of priority shown: A. First: To the payment of all necessary and reasonable Operating Expenses or other expenses required by statute to be a first charge on and claim against the revenues of the System. B. Second: To the payment of the amounts required to be deposited into the special funds and accounts created and established for the payment, security and benefit of the Previously Issued Parity Obligations,the Bonds, and any Additional Senior Lien Obligations hereafter issued by the City. C. Third: To the payment of the amounts required to be deposited into the special funds and accounts created and established for the payment,security and benefit of the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations hereafter issued by the City. D. Fourth: To the payment of the amounts that must be deposited in any special funds and accounts created and established for the payment, security, and benefit of any Inferior Lien Obligations hereafter issued by the City. Any Net Revenues remaining in the System Fund following such transfers may be used by the City for payment of other obligations of the System, and for any other lawful purpose. SECTION 13. Bond Fund - Excess Funds. For purposes of providing funds to pay the principal of and interest on the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations as the same become due and payable, the City agrees to maintain, at the Depository, a separate and special Fund or account to be created and known as the "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds Interest and Sinking Fund" (the Bond Fund). The City covenants that there shall be deposited by an Authorized Official into the Bond Fund prior to each principal and interest payment date from the available Net Revenues an amount equal to one hundred per cent (100%) of the amount required to fully pay the interest on and the principal of the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations then falling due and payable, such deposits to pay maturing principal and accrued interest on the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations to be made in substantially equal monthly installments on or before the IW' day of each month, beginning on or before the 10t1 day of the month next following the delivery of the Bonds to the Purchasers. As described further in Section 15 hereof, if the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues in any month are insufficient to make the required payments into the Bond Fund, then the amount of any deficiency in such payment shall be added to the amount otherwise required to be paid into the Bond Fund in the next month. The required monthly deposits to the Bond Fund for the payment of principal of and interest on the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations shall continue to be made as hereinabove provided until such time as (i)the total amount on deposit in the Bond Fund and Reserve Fund is equal to the amount required to fully pay and discharge all Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations(principal and interest)or(ii)the Senior Lien Obligations are no longer Outstanding. Any proceeds of the Bonds,and investment income thereon,not expended for authorized purposes shall be deposited into the Bond Fund and shall be taken into consideration and reduce the amount of monthly deposits required to be deposited into the Bond Fund from the Net Revenues of the System. 138634808.3 -28- Any surplus proceeds from the sale of the Bonds, including investment income thereon, not expended for authorized purposes shall be deposited in the Bond Fund,and such amounts so deposited shall reduce the sums otherwise required to be deposited in such Fund from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. SECTION 14. Reserve Fund. To accumulate and maintain a reserve for the payment of the Bonds equal to 100% of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements or such lesser amount as restricted by the Code (calculated by the City Council at the beginning of each Fiscal Year and as of the date of issuance of the Bonds and each series of Additional Senior Lien Obligations) for the Bonds (the Required Reserve Amount),the City hereby creates and establishes, and shall maintain at a Depository a separate and special fund known as the "Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds Reserve Fund"(the Reserve Fund). Earnings and income derived from the investment of amounts held for the credit of the Reserve Fund shall be retained in the Reserve Fund until the Reserve Fund contains the Required Reserve Amount; thereafter, such earnings and income shall be deposited to the credit of the System Fund. All funds deposited into the Reserve Fund shall be used solely for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds,when and to the extent other funds available for such purposes are insufficient and,in addition,may be used to retire the last Stated Maturity or Stated Maturities of or interest on the Bonds. The City may acquire a Credit Facility or Facilities issued by a Credit Provider in amounts equal to all or part of the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds in lieu of depositing cash into the Reserve Fund; provided,however, that no such Credit Facility may be so substituted unless the substitution of the Credit Facility will not, in and of itself, cause any ratings then assigned to the Bonds by any nationally recognized rating agency to be lowered and the resolution authorizing the substitution of the Credit Facility for all or part of the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds contains(i)a finding that such substitution is cost effective and(ii)a provision that the interest due on any repayment obligation of the City by reason of payments made under such Credit Facility does not exceed the highest lawful rate of interest which may be paid by the City at the time of the delivery of the Credit Facility. The City reserves the right to use Senior Lien Pledged Revenues to fund the payment of(1)periodic premiums on the Credit Facility as a part of the payment of the City's Operating Expenses,and(2)any repayment obligation incurred by the City(including interest)to the Credit Provider,the payment of which will result in the reinstatement of such Credit Facility, prior to making payments required to be made to the Reserve Fund pursuant to the provisions of this Section to restore the balance in such fund the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds. Until the issuance of any Additional Senior Lien Obligations(or as from time to time recalculated by the City as provided in the first paragraph of this Section),the Required Reserve Amount is$[ 1 (inclusive of the Bonds). Of this amount, $[ representing the increase in the Required Reserve Amount attributable to the issuance of the Bonds, shall be deposited to the Reserve Fund at such time as may be required pursuant to the provisions of this Section from Revenues, paid from the System Fund at such level of priority as specified in Section 12,by the deposit of monthly installments,made on or before the 10t1 day of each month following the month in which such obligation to fund the Reserve Fund arises, of not less than 1/60th of the amount to be maintained in the Reserve Fund. As and when Additional Senior Lien Obligations are delivered or incurred, the Required Reserve Amount shall be increased,if required,to an amount calculated in the manner provided in the first paragraph of this Section. Any additional amount required to be maintained in the Reserve Fund shall be so accumulated by the deposit of all or a portion of the necessary amount from the proceeds of the issue or other lawfully available funds in the Reserve Fund immediately after the delivery of the then proposed Additional Senior Lien Obligations or, at the option of the City, by the deposit of monthly installments, made on or before the business day before the 10th day of each month following the month of delivery of the then proposed Additional Senior Lien Obligations, of not less than 1/60th of the additional amount to be maintained in the Reserve Fund by reason of the issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then 138634808.3 -29- being issued (or 1/60th of the balance of the additional amount not deposited immediately in cash) (such deposits,the Required Reserve Fund Deposits),thereby ensuring the accumulation in the Reserve Fund of the appropriate Required Reserve Amount. When and for so long as the cash and investments in the Reserve Fund equal the Required Reserve Amount,no deposits need be made to the credit of the Reserve Fund;but,if and when the Reserve Fund at any time contains less than the Required Reserve Amount (other than as the result of the issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations as provided in the preceding paragraph),the City covenants and agrees to cure the deficiency in the Required Reserve Amount by resuming the Required Reserve Fund Deposits to the Reserve Fund from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues in monthly deposit amounts equal to not less than 1/60th of the Required Reserve Amount covenanted by the City to be maintained in the Reserve Fund. Any such deficiency payments shall be made on or before the 10t1 day of each month until the Required Reserve Amount has been fully restored. The City further covenants and agrees that, subject only to the prior payments to be made to the Bond Fund, the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues shall be applied and appropriated and used to establish and maintain the Required Reserve Amount and to cure any deficiency in such amounts as required by the terms of this Ordinance and any other ordinance pertaining to the issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations. During such time as the Reserve Fund contains the Required Reserve Amount, the City Council may, at its option, withdraw all surplus funds in the Reserve Fund in excess of the Required Reserve Amount. Any such withdrawn surplus shall be deposited to the Bond Fund or used by the City for any other lawful purpose;provided,however,to the extent that such excess amount represents Bond proceeds, then such amount must be transferred to the Bond Fund or be otherwise used in accordance with then- applicable State law. In the event a Credit Facility issued to satisfy all or a part of the City's obligation with respect to the Reserve Fund causes the amount then on deposit in the Reserve Fund to exceed the Required Reserve Amount for the Bonds, the City may transfer such excess amount to any fund or funds established for the payment of or security for the Bonds (including any escrow established for the final payment of any such obligations pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1207,as amended, Texas Government Code),or be used for any lawful purposes; provided, however, to the extent that such excess amount represents Bond proceeds,then such amount must be transferred to the Bond Fund or be otherwise used in accordance with then-applicable State law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section and except for any reserve fund requirements imposed on the City by the TWDB in Section 29 hereof,the requirements set forth above to fund the Reserve Fund in the amount of the Required Reserve Amount shall be suspended for such time as the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for each Fiscal Year are equal to at least 110% of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements. In the event that the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for any two consecutive Fiscal Years are less than 110% (unless such percentage is below 100% in any Fiscal Year, in which case the hereinafter—specified requirements will commence after such Fiscal Year)of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements,the City will be required to commence making the deposits to the Reserve Fund, as provided above, and to continue making such deposits until the earlier of(i)such time as the Reserve Fund contains the Required Reserve Amount or (ii) the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues for a Fiscal Year have been equal to not less than 110% of the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements. SECTION 15. Deficiencies - Excess Senior Lien Pledged Revenues. A. If on any occasion there shall not be sufficient Senior Lien Pledged Revenues to make the required deposits into the Bond Fund,then such deficiency shall be cured as soon as possible from the next available unallocated Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,or from any other sources available for such purpose, 138634808.3 -30- and such payments shall be in addition to the amounts required to be paid into these Funds or accounts during such month or months. B. Subject to making the required deposits to the Bond Fund when and as required by any ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of the Senior Lien Obligations, the Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Inferior Lien Obligations,the excess Net Revenues of the System may be used by the City for any lawful purpose (as further provided in Section 12 hereof). SECTION 16. Payment of Bonds. While any of the Bonds are Outstanding, an Authorized Official shall cause to be transferred to the Paying Agent/Registrar therefor, from funds on deposit in the Bond Fund, amounts sufficient to fully pay and discharge promptly each installment of interest on and principal of the Bonds as such installment accrues or matures; such transfer of funds must be made in such manner as will cause immediately available funds to be deposited with the Paying Agent/Registrar for the Bonds at the close of the business day next preceding the date a debt service payment is due on the Bonds. SECTION 17. Investments. Funds held in any Fund or account created, established, or maintained pursuant to this Ordinance shall,at the option of the City,be placed in time deposits,certificates of deposit,guaranteed investment contracts or similar contractual agreements as permitted by the provisions of the Public Funds Investment Act, as amended, Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code (collateralized pursuant to the Public Funds Collateral Act, as amended, Chapter 2257, Texas Government Code),or any other law, and secured (to the extent not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) by obligations of the type hereinafter described, including investments held in book-entry form, in securities including,but not limited to, direct obligations of the United States of America, obligations guaranteed or insured by the United States of America,which,in the opinion of the Attorney General of the United States, are backed by its full faith and credit or represent its general obligations,or invested in indirect obligations of the United States of America including,but not limited to,evidences of indebtedness issued,insured,or guaranteed by such governmental agencies as the Federal Land Banks,Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Banks for Cooperatives,Federal Home Loan Banks,Government National Mortgage Association,Farmers Home Administration, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, or Federal Housing Association; provided that all such deposits and investments shall be made in such a manner that the money required to be expended from any Fund or account will be available at the proper time or times. Such investments (except State and Local Government Series investments held in book entry form, which shall at all times be valued at cost)shall be valued in terms of current market value within 45 days of the close of each Fiscal Year. All interest and income derived from deposits and investments in the Bond Fund immediately shall be credited to,and any losses debited to,the Bond Fund. All such investments shall be sold promptly when necessary to prevent any default in connection with the Bonds. SECTION 18. Covenants. It is expressly recognized that prior to the issuance of any Additional Senior Lien Obligations, Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, or Inferior Lien Obligations, that the City must comply with each of the conditions precedent contained in this Ordinance and the City ordinances. A. Performance. It will faithfully perform at all times any and all covenants, undertakings, stipulations, and provisions contained in this Ordinance, and each ordinance authorizing the issuance of Senior Lien Obligations; it will promptly pay or cause to be paid the principal amount of and interest on all Debt, on the dates and in the places and manner prescribed in such ordinances and such Debt; and it will, at the time and in the manner prescribed, deposit or cause to be deposited the amounts required to be deposited into the System Fund and the Funds herein created; and any registered owner of any Debt may require the City, its officials and employees to carry out,respect or enforce the covenants and obligations of this Ordinance, or any ordinance authorizing the issuance of Debt, by all legal and equitable means, 138634808.3 -31- including specifically,but without limitation,the use and filing of mandamus proceedings,in any court of competent jurisdiction, against the City,its officials and employees. B. City's Legal Authority. It is a duly created and existing home rule city of the State of Texas, and is duly authorized under the laws of the State of Texas to issue the Bonds; that all action on its part for the issuance of the Bonds has been duly and effectively taken,and that the Bonds in the hands of the owners thereof are and will be valid and enforceable special obligations of the City in accordance with their terms. C. Acquisition and Construction; Operation and Maintenance. (1)It shall use its best efforts in accordance with Prudent Utility Practice to acquire and construct, or cause to be acquired and constructed, any Capital Additions or Capital Improvements, in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor, as modified from time to time, with due diligence and in a sound and economical manner;and(2)it shall at all times use its best efforts to operate or cause to be operated the System properly and in an efficient manner,consistent with Prudent Utility Practice,and shall use its best efforts to maintain, preserve, reconstruct and keep the same or cause the same to be so maintained, preserved, reconstructed and kept, with the appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof, in good repair, working order and condition, and shall from time to time make, or use its best efforts to cause to be made, all necessary and proper repairs,replacement and renewals so that at all times the operation of the System may be properly and advantageously conducted. D. Title. It has or will obtain lawful title,whether such title is in fee or lesser interest, to the lands,buildings,structures and facilities constituting the System,that it warrants that it will defend the title to all the aforesaid lands, buildings, structures and facilities, and every part thereof, for the benefit of the owners of the Senior Lien Obligations, against the claims and demands of all persons whomsoever, that it is lawfully qualified to pledge the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues to the payment of the Senior Lien Obligations in the manner prescribed herein,and has lawfully exercised such rights. E. Liens. It will from time to time and before the same become delinquent pay and discharge all taxes, assessments and governmental charges, if any, which shall be lawfully imposed upon it, or the System;it will pay all lawful claims for rents,royalties,labor,materials and supplies which if unpaid might by law become a lien or charge thereon,the lien of which would be prior to or interfere with the liens hereof, so that the priority of the liens granted hereunder shall be fully preserved in the manner provided herein, and it will not create or suffer to be created any mechanic's,laborer's,materialman's or other lien or charge which might or could be prior to the liens hereof, or do or suffer any matter or thing whereby the liens hereof might or could be impaired; provided however, that no such tax, assessment or charge, and that no such claims which might be used as the basis of a mechanic's, laborer's, materialman's or other lien or charge, shall be required to be paid so long as the validity of the same shall be contested in good faith by the City. F. No Free Service. No free service or service otherwise than in accordance with the established rate schedule shall be furnished, directly or indirectly, by the System to any person, firm, corporation or other entity,other than the City. No part of the salary of any official or employee of the City or his replacement shall be paid from Senior Lien Pledged Revenues unless and only to the extent the duties and performances of such official or employee or his replacement appertain directly to the System. To the extent the City receives the services of the System, such services shall be accounted for according to the established rate schedule. G. Further Encumbrance. It will not additionally encumber the Net Revenues of the System in any manner, except as permitted in this Ordinance (which provisions are also included in other City ordinances authorizing other series of Senior Lien Obligations). 138634808.3 -32- H. Sale, Lease or Disposal of Property. No part of the System shall be sold, leased, mortgaged,demolished,removed or otherwise disposed of,except as follows: (1) To the extent permitted by law,the City may sell or exchange at any time and from time to time any property or facilities constituting part of the System only if(A)it shall determine such property or facilities are not useful in the operation of the System,or(B)the proceeds of such sale are $250,000 or less, or it shall have received a certificate executed by an Engineer and the City Manager stating, in their opinion, that the fair market value of the property or facilities exchanged is $250,000 or less, or (C) if such proceeds or fair market value exceeds $250,000 it shall have received a certificate executed by an Engineer and the City Manager stating (i) that system within the System of which the property or facilities comprises a part thereof and (ii) in their opinion, that the sale or exchange of such property or facilities will not impair the ability of the City to comply during the current or any future Fiscal Year with the provisions of Subsection K of this Section. The proceeds of any such sale or exchange not used to acquire other property necessary or desirable for the safe or efficient operation of the System shall forthwith,at the option of the City (i) be used to redeem or purchase Debt, or (ii) otherwise be used to provide for the payment of Debt. The foregoing notwithstanding, if such property or facilities sold or exchanged constituted property or facilities comprising all or a part of a system within the System, the acquisition,improvement or extension of such system having not been financed by the City in any manner with the proceeds of Debt, or with the proceeds of obligations which were refunded in whole or in part with the proceeds of Debt, then the City may utilize the proceeds of such sale or exchange for any lawful purpose; and (2) To the extent permitted by law, the City may lease or make contracts or grant licenses for the operation of,or make arrangements for the use of,or grant easements or other rights with respect to,any part of the System,provided that any such lease,contract,license,arrangement, easement or right(A)does not impede the operation by the City of the System and(B)does not in any manner impair or adversely affect the rights or security of the owners of the Debt under this Ordinance; and provided, further,that if the depreciated cost of the property to be covered by any such lease,contract,license,arrangement,easement or other right is in excess of$500,000,the City shall have received a certificate executed by an Engineer and the City Manager that the action of the City with respect thereto does not result in a breach of the conditions under this clause (2).Any payments received by the City under or in connection with any such lease, contract, license, arrangement, easement or right in respect of the System or any part thereof shall constitute Gross Revenues. I. Books, Records and Accounts. It shall keep proper books, records and accounts separate and apart from all other records and accounts, in which complete and correct entries shall be made of all transactions relating to the System and the City shall cause said books and accounts to be audited annually as of the close of each Fiscal Year by the Accountant. J. Insurance. (1) Except as otherwise permitted in clause (2)below,it shall cause to be insured such parts of the System as would usually be insured by corporations operating like properties, with a responsible insurance company or companies, against risks, accidents or casualties against which and to the extent insurance is usually carried by corporations operating like properties including,to the extent reasonably obtainable, fire and extended coverage insurance, insurance against damage by floods, and use and occupancy insurance. Public liability and property damage insurance shall also be carried unless the City Attorney gives a written opinion to the effect that the City is not liable for claims which would be protected by such insurance. At any time while any contractor 138634808.3 -33- engaged in construction work shall be fully responsible therefor, the City shall not be required to carry insurance on the work being constructed if the contractor is required to carry appropriate insurance. All such policies shall be open to the inspection of the bondholders and their representatives at all reasonable times. In no event shall the amount of insurance maintained on the projects financed with the proceeds of the Bonds be less than the amount necessary to protect the Purchaser's interest. (2) In lieu of obtaining policies for insurance as provided above, the City may self- insure against risks, accidents,claims or casualties described in clause (1)above. (3) The annual audit hereinafter required shall contain a section commenting on whether or not the City has complied with the requirements of this Section with respect to the maintenance of insurance, and listing the areas of insurance for which the City is self-insuring, all policies carried, and whether or not all insurance premiums upon the insurance policies to which reference is hereinbefore made have been paid. K. Audits. After the close of each Fiscal Year while any Debt is Outstanding,an audit will be made of the books and accounts relating to the System and the Net Revenues by the Accountant. Such annual audit reports shall be open to the inspection of the registered owners of Debt and their agents and representatives at all reasonable times. L. Governmental Agencies. It will comply with all of the terms and conditions of any and all franchises, permits and authorizations applicable to or necessary with respect to the System, and which have been obtained from any governmental agency; and the City has or will obtain and keep in full force and effect all franchises, permits, authorization and other requirements applicable to or necessary with respect to the acquisition,construction, equipment,operation and maintenance of the System. M. No Competition. To the extent it legally may, it will not grant any franchise or permit for the acquisition, construction or operation of any competing facilities which might be used as a substitute for the System's facilities, and,to the extent that it legally may,the City will prohibit any such competing facilities. N. Rights of Inspection. The Engineer or any registered owner of $100,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Debt then Outstanding shall have the right at all reasonable times to inspect the System and all records,accounts and data of the City relating thereto,and upon request the City shall furnish to an Engineer or such registered owner, as the case may be, such financial statements, reports and other information relating to the City and the System as an Engineer or such registered owner may from time to time reasonably request. SECTION 19. Issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations, Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations, and Inferior Lien Obligations. The City hereby expressly reserves the right to hereafter issue bonds, notes, warrants, certificates of obligation, or similar obligations, payable, wholly or in part, as appropriate,from and secured by a pledge of and lien on the Net Revenues of the System with the following priorities, without limitation as to principal amount, but subject to any terms, conditions, or restrictions applicable thereto under existing ordinances,laws,or otherwise: A. Additional Senior Lien Obligations, secured by and payable from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,which includes(primarily)a first and prior lien on and pledge of Net Revenues that is senior and 138634808.3 -34- superior to the lien there on and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Subordinate Lien Obligations and any Inferior Lien Obligations,upon satisfying each of the following conditions precedent: (1) The City Manager (or other officer of the City then having the responsibility for the financial affairs of the City) shall have executed a certificate stating (i)that the City is not then in default as to any covenant, obligation or agreement contained in any ordinance or other proceeding relating to any obligations of the City payable from and secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues and (ii)that the amounts on deposit in all Funds or Accounts created and established for the payment and security of all Outstanding obligations payable from and secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues are the amounts then required to be deposited therein. Such certificate shall be dated on or before the date of delivery of such Additional Senior Lien Obligations, but such certificate shall not be dated prior to the date an ordinance is passed authorizing the issuance of such Additional Senior Lien Obligations. (2) Conditions Precedent for Issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations- Capital Improvements and for any other Lawful Purpose except for Capital Additions or for Refunding. The City covenants and agrees that Additional Senior Lien Obligations will not be issued for the purpose of financing Capital Improvements, or for any other lawful purpose (except for Capital Additions or for refunding,which are to be issued in accordance with the provisions of Subsection (3)of this Section and Section 20 hereof,respectively)unless and until the conditions precedent in Subsection (1) above have been satisfied and, in addition thereto, the City has secured a certification of the City Manager to the effect that, according to the books and records of the City, the Net Earnings (hereinafter defined) for the preceding Fiscal Year or for 12 consecutive months out of the 15 months immediately preceding the month the ordinance authorizing the Additional Senior Lien Obligations is adopted are at least equal to 1.15 times the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements for all then-Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations after giving effect to the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then proposed. The foregoing notwithstanding, the City covenants and agrees that Additional Senior Lien Obligations may not be issued for the purpose of financing Capital Improvements when other Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations which have been issued for the purpose of financing Capital Additions and for which capitalized interest for such other Senior Lien Obligations has been provided for at least the twelve months subsequent to the date of issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then proposed to be issued, unless the conditions precedent in Subsection(1) above have been satisfied and, in addition thereto,the City has either (1)complied with the relevant conditions in this Subsection as set forth above,or(2)if the relevant conditions of this Subsection (2) as set forth above cannot be satisfied, the City has satisfied the conditions precedent in Subsection(3)(1)and(ii)of this Section(but,for purposes of such clauses, the term Capital Improvements shall be substituted for the term Capital Additions where the term Capital Additions appears therein to the extent necessary to give recognition to the fact that Capital Improvements, rather than Capital Additions, are then to be financed) and has secured a certification of the City Manager to the effect that, according to the books and records of the City, the Net Earnings for the preceding Fiscal Year or for 12 consecutive months out of the 15 months immediately preceding the month the ordinance authorizing the Additional Senior Lien Obligations is adopted are at least equal to 1.15 times the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements for all then-Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations (other than Senior Lien Obligations issued for Capital Additions for which capitalized interest has been provided for at least the twelve months subsequent to the date of issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations proposed to be issued)after giving effect to the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then proposed to be issued. (3) Conditions Precedent for Issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations- Capital Additions: Initial Issue. The City covenants and agrees that Additional Senior Lien Obligations will not be issued for the purpose of financing Capital Additions, unless the same conditions 138634808.3 -35- precedent specified in Subsection (1) above have been satisfied and, in addition thereto,either the relevant conditions precedent specified in Subsection (1) above are satisfied or, in the alternative, the City shall have obtained: (i) from an Engineer a comprehensive engineering report for each Capital Addition to be financed,which report shall(A)contain(1)detailed estimates of the cost of acquiring and constructing the Capital Addition, (2) the estimated date the acquisition and construction of the Capital Addition will be completed and commercially operative, and (3) a detailed analysis of the impact of the Capital Addition on the financial operations of the system for which the Capital Addition is to be integrated and to the System as a whole during the construction thereof and for at least five Fiscal Years after the date the Capital Addition becomes commercially operative,and(B)conclude that(1)the Capital Addition is necessary and will substantially increase the capacity, or is needed to replace existing facilities, to meet current and projected demands for the service or product to be provided thereby,and(2)the estimated cost of providing the service or product from the Capital Addition will be reasonable in comparison with projected costs for furnishing such service or product from other reasonably available sources; and(ii)a certificate of an Engineer to the effect that, based on an engineering report prepared thereby for each Capital Addition, the projected Net Earnings for each of the five Fiscal Years subsequent to the date the Capital Addition becomes commercially operative (as estimated in the engineering report)will be equal to at least 1.15 times the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements for the currently Outstanding Senior Lien Obligations or incurred and all Additional Senior Lien Obligations estimated to be issued, if any, for all Capital Improvements and for all Capital Additions then in progress or then being initiated, during the period from the date the first series of obligations for the Capital Additions is to be delivered through the fifth Fiscal Year subsequent to the date the Capital Addition is estimated to become commercially operative. (4) Completion Issues. Once a Capital Addition has been initiated by meeting the conditions precedent specified in Subsection (3)(1) and (ii) above and the initial Senior Lien Obligations issued therefor are delivered,the City reserves the right to issue Additional Senior Lien Obligations to finance the remaining costs of such Capital Addition in such amounts as may be necessary to complete the acquisition and construction thereof and make the same commercially operative without satisfaction of any condition precedent under Subsection (3)(1) and (ii) or Subsection (1) of this Section but subject to satisfaction of the following conditions precedent: (i)the City makes a forecast (the Forecast) of the operations of the System demonstrating the System's ability to pay all obligations, payable from the Net Revenues of the System to be Outstanding after the issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then being issued for the period (the Forecast Period) of each ensuing Fiscal Year through the fifth Fiscal Year subsequent to the latest estimated date such Capital Addition is expected to be commercially operative; and (ii)an Engineer reviews such Forecast and executes a certificate to the effect that(A) such Forecast is reasonable, and based thereon(and such other factors deemed to be relevant),the Net Revenues of the System will be adequate to pay all the obligations, payable from the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues of the System to be Outstanding after the issuance of the Additional Senior Lien Obligations then being issued for the Forecast Period and (B)the proceeds from the sale of such Additional Senior Lien Obligations are estimated to be sufficient to complete such acquisition and construction. (5) Computations,Reports. With reference to Senior Lien Obligations anticipated and estimated to be issued or incurred,the Average Annual Debt Service Requirements therefor shall be those reasonably estimated and computed by the City's Director of Finance and Procurement (or other officer of the City then having the primary responsibility for the financial affairs of the City) after giving effect to the receipt or anticipated receipt of a refundable tax credit or similar payment relating to any series of Senior Lien Obligations irrevocably designated as refundable tax credit bonds,which payment shall be treated as an offset to regularly scheduled debt service of the 138634808.3 -36- series of Senior Lien Obligations to which it relates. In the preparation of the engineering report required in Subsection(3)(1) above, an Engineer may rely on other experts or professionals, including those in the employment of the City, provided such engineering report discloses the extent of such reliance and concludes it is reasonable so to rely.In connection with the issuance of Senior Lien Obligations for Capital Additions, the certification of the City Manager and an Engineer,together with the engineering report for the initial issue and the Forecast for a subsequent issue, shall be conclusive evidence and the only evidence required to show compliance with the provisions and requirements and this clause of this Section. (6) Combination Issues. Senior Lien Obligations for Capital Additions may be combined in a single issue with Senior Lien Obligations for Capital Improvements or for any lawful purpose provided the conditions precedent set forth in Subsection(2)through(4)are complied with as the same relate to the appropriate purpose. (7) Definition of Net Earnings. As used in this Section, the term Net Earnings shall mean the Gross Revenues of the System after deducting the Operating Expenses of the System and those items identified in the SECOND level of priority in Section 12 hereof,but not expenditures which,under standard accounting practice, should be charged to capital expenditures. (8) Determination of Net Earnings. In making a determination of Net Earnings for any of the purposes described in this Section, the City Manager may take into consideration a change in the rates and charges for services and facilities afforded by the System that became effective at least 60 days prior to the last day of the period for which Net Earnings are determined and, for purposes of satisfying any of the Net Earnings test described above, make a pro forma determination of the Net Earnings of the System for the period of time covered by the City Manager's certification or opinion based on such change in rates and charges being in effect for the entire period covered by the City Manager's certificate or opinion. B. The City may issue Additional Subordinate Lien Obligations secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Senior Lien Obligations and that is included in the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues,respectively, and senior and superior to the lien there on and pledge thereof securing the repayment of the Inferior Lien Obligations, on the terms and conditions desired by the City, subject only to the limitations imposed by applicable law and upon satisfying each of the conditions precedent contained in this Ordinance, and the Previously Issued Subordinate Lien Obligations. C. The City may issue Inferior Lien Obligations secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the System subordinate and inferior to the lien thereon and pledge thereof securing the Senior Lien Obligations and Subordinate Lien Obligations and that is included in the Senior Lien Pledged Revenues, respectively, on the terms and conditions desired by the City, subject only to the limitations imposed by applicable law and upon satisfying each of the conditions precedent contained in the ordinances authorizing the issuance of this Ordinance. SECTION 20. Refunding Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue refunding bonds to refund all or any part of the currently Outstanding Debt,pursuant to any applicable law then available,upon such terms and conditions as the City Council may deem to be in the best interest of the City, and if less than all such currently Outstanding Debt are refunded, the conditions precedent prescribed for the issuance of Additional Senior Lien Obligations set forth in Section 19 of this Ordinance shall be satisfied and the City Managers' certification required in Section 19 shall give effect to the Debt Service Requirements of the proposed refunding bonds (but shall not give effect to the Debt Service Requirements of the obligations being refunded following their cancellation or provision being made for their payment). 138634808.3 -37- SECTION 21. Issuance of Special Project Bonds. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to deny the City the right and it shall retain the right to issue Special Project Bonds,provided,however,the City will not issue Special Project Bonds unless the City concludes, upon recommendation of the City Council, that (i)the plan for developing the Special Project is consistent with sound planning, (ii)the Special Project would not materially and adversely interfere with the operation of the System, (iii) the Special Project can be economically and efficiently operated and maintained, and (iv)the Special Project can be economically and efficiently utilized by the City to meet combined utility system requirements and the cost of such will be reasonable. SECTION 22. Security of Funds. All money on deposit in the funds or accounts for which this Ordinance makes provision(except any portion thereof as may be at any time properly invested as provided herein)shall be secured in the manner and to the fullest extent required by the laws of Texas for the security of public funds, and money on deposit in such Funds or accounts shall be used only for the purposes permitted by this Ordinance. SECTION 23. Remedies in Event of Default. The Purchasers may exercise all rights and remedies available to it in law or equity, and any provision of the Bonds that restricts or limits the Purchasers' full exercise of these remedies shall be of no force and effect. In addition to all the rights and remedies provided by the laws of the State of Texas, the City covenants and agrees particularly that in the event the City (a)defaults in the payments to be made to the Bond Fund, or(b)defaults in the observance or performance of any other of the covenants, conditions, or obligations set forth in this Ordinance, the Holders of any of the Bonds shall be entitled to seek a writ of mandamus issued by a court of proper jurisdiction compelling and requiring the governing body of the City and other officers of the City to observe and perform any covenant, condition, or obligation prescribed in this Ordinance. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such default or acquiescence therein, and every such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. The specific remedy herein provided shall be cumulative of all other existing remedies and the specification of such remedy shall not be deemed to be exclusive. SECTION 24. Notices to Holders Waiver. Wherever this Ordinance provides for notice to Holders of any event, such notice shall be sufficiently given (unless otherwise herein expressly provided) if in writing and sent by United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the address of each Holder as it appears in the Security Register. In any case where notice to Holders is given by mail,neither the failure to mail such notice to any particular Holders,nor any defect in any notice so mailed, shall affect the sufficiency of such notice with respect to all other Holders. Where this Ordinance provides for notice in any manner, such notice may be waived in writing by the Holder entitled to receive such notice,either before or after the event with respect to which such notice is given, and such waiver shall be the equivalent of such notice. Waivers of notice by Holders shall be filed with the Paying Agent/Registrar,but such filing shall not be a condition precedent to the validity of any action taken in reliance upon such waiver. SECTION 25. Bonds Are Negotiable Instruments. Each of the Bonds authorized herein shall be deemed and construed to be a "security" and as such a negotiable instrument with the meaning of the Chapter 8 of the Texas Uniform Commercial Code. SECTION 26. Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered for payment,transfer,redemption,exchange, or replacement, if surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar, shall be promptly canceled by it and, if 138634808.3 -38- surrendered to the City, shall be delivered to the Paying Agent/Registrar and,if not already canceled, shall be promptly canceled by the Paying Agent/Registrar. The City may at any time deliver to the Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation any Bonds previously certified or registered and delivered which the City may have acquired in any manner whatsoever, and all Bonds so delivered shall be promptly canceled by the Paying Agent/Registrar. All canceled Bonds held by the Paying Agent/Registrar shall be destroyed as directed by the City. SECTION 27. Mutilated, Destroyed. Lost, and Stolen Bonds. If (i) any mutilated Bond is surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar,or the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar receive evidence to their satisfaction of the destruction,loss,or theft of any Bond, and(ii)there is delivered to the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar such security or indemnity as may be required to save each of them harmless,then, in the absence of notice to the City or the Paying Agent/Registrar that such Bond has been acquired by a bona fide purchaser, the City shall execute and,upon its request,the Paying Agent/Registrar shall register and deliver, in exchange for or in lieu of any such mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond, a new Bond of the same Stated Maturity and interest rate and of like tenor and principal amount,bearing a number not contemporaneously Outstanding. In case any such mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond has become or is about to become due and payable,the City in its discretion may,instead of issuing a new Bond,pay such Bond. Upon the issuance of any new Bond or payment in lieu thereof, under this Section, the City may require payment by the Holder of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge imposed in relation thereto and any other expenses(including attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of the Paying Agent/Registrar)connected therewith. Every new Bond issued pursuant to this Section in lieu of any mutilated,destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond shall constitute a replacement of the prior obligation of the City, whether or not the mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Bond shall be at any time enforceable by anyone, and shall be entitled to all the benefits of this Ordinance equally and ratably with all other Outstanding Bonds. The provisions of this Section are exclusive and shall preclude (to the extent lawful)all other rights and remedies with respect to the replacement and payment of mutilated,destroyed,lost,or stolen Bonds. SECTION 28. Confirmation of Sale, Approval of Private Placement Memorandum. The sale of the Bonds to the Texas Water Development Board(the Purchaser)for the purchase price of$[ , which represents a purchase price of par, less the Purchaser's origination fee of$ and no accrued interest,pursuant to a loan commitment received from the Purchaser,is hereby confirmed. The pricing and terms of the Bonds are hereby found and determined to be the most advantageous reasonably obtained from the City. Delivery of the Bonds shall be made to the Purchaser as soon as practicable after the adoption of this Ordinance, upon payment therefor by federal funds wire transfer, at no cost to the Purchaser, in accordance with the terms of sale. Furthermore, the City hereby approves in all respects the City's Private Placement Memorandum prepared in conjunction with the sale of the Bonds and to be delivered to the Purchaser on the Closing Date. The Mayor and/or City Secretary are further authorized and directed to manually execute and deliver for and on behalf of the City copies of the Private Placement Memorandum in final form as may be required by the Purchaser, and such final Private Placement Memorandum in the form and content manually executed by said officials shall be deemed to be approved by the City Council and constitute the Private Placement Memorandum authorized for deliver to the Purchaser. SECTION 29. Compliance with Purchaser's Rules and Regulations. The City will comply with all of the requirements contained in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Purchaser with respect to 138634808.3 -39- the issuance of the Bonds. In addition, in compliance with the Purchaser's State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Program Rules, the City agrees and covenants so long as the Purchaser is the sole Holder of the Bonds: A. to keep and maintain full and complete records and accounts pertaining to the construction of the project refinanced with the proceeds of sale of the Bonds,including the Escrow Fund(defined herein), in accordance with the standards set forth by the Government Accounting Standard Board; B. to create and establish at the Depository a "City of Corpus Christi, Texas State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund for the receipt and disbursement of all proceeds from the sale of the Bonds and all other funds acquired by the City in connection with the planning and construction of the projects financed,in whole or in part,by the Purchaser pursuant to the loan evidenced by the Bonds and all funds deposited to the credit of the Construction Fund shall be disbursed only for the payment of costs and expenses incurred in connection with the planning and building of such projects as approved by the Purchaser and as otherwise allowed by the rules; C. to provide the Purchaser with copies of"as built plans"pertaining to the projects financed, in whole or in part,with any funds of the Purchaser; D. upon completion of the construction of the projects financed, in whole or in part, by the loan evidenced by the Bonds,to provide a final accounting to the Purchaser of the total costs of the projects. In determining the amount of available funds for building the project, the City agrees to account for all amounts deposited to the credit of the Construction Fund, including all loan funds extended by the Purchaser, all other funds available from the projects as described in the project engineer's or fiscal representative's sufficiency of funds statement and all interest earned by the City on money in the Construction Fund. Amounts determined to represent excess or unneeded Bond proceeds shall,at the City's option and upon receipt of prior approval of the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser, be (i) used to redeem Bonds in accordance with Section 4.13 hereof, (ii) deposited to the Bond Fund for the purpose of paying scheduled debt service on the Bonds, or(iii)used to pay eligible costs of the project for which the Bonds were issued, as first approved by the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser; E. in addition to the requirements contained in Section 18.I hereof, to maintain current, accurate,and complete records and accounts necessary to demonstrate compliance with financial assistance related legal and contractual provisions; F. to comply with any special conditions specified by the Purchaser's water conservation plan as specified in 31 TAC 363.42(a)(2)(F)until all financial obligations to the Purchaser have been discharged; G. to abide by the Purchaser's rules and relevant state statutes now or hereafter existing, including,but not limited to,the Purchasers' pre-design funding procedures; H. to not use Bond proceeds to pay for the cost of sampling,testing,removing or disposing of contaminated soils and/or media at the project site; I. to report to the Purchasers the amounts of project funds, if any, that were used to compensate historically underutilized businesses that worked on the project,in accordance with 31 TAC § 363.1312; J. to notify the Executive Administrator of the Purchaser prior to taking any actions to alter the legal status of the City Council in any manner(such as a sale-transfer-merger with another retail public 138634808.3 -40- utility that results in a change in governance of the System) and to receive approval from the Purchaser of any action to convey the City's obligations to the Purchaser, as the Holder of the Bonds,to another entity; K. to the extent permitted by law,to indemnify,hold harmless,and protect the Purchaser from any and all claims, causes of action, or damages to the person or property of third parties arising from the sampling, analysis, transport, storage, treatment and disposition of any contaminated sewage sludge, contaminated sediments and/or contaminated media that may be generated by the City, its contractors, consultants, agents,officials, and employees as a result of activities relating to the project refinanced with proceeds of the Bonds to the extent permitted by law; L. to comply, and take steps to assure that its contractors and sub-contractors shall comply with the Davis Bacon Act(being Subchapter IV of Chapter 31 of Title 40 of the United States Code), and the United Stated Department of Labor's implementing regulations therefor, with respect to projects financed with proceeds of the Bonds; M. to submit outlay reports with sufficient documentation on costs on a quarterly or monthly basis in accordance with the Purchaser's outlay report guidelines; N. to provide the Purchaser with all information required to be reported in accordance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109-282, and the City shall obtain a Data Universal Numbering System Number, register with the System for Award Management (SAM), and maintain current registration at all times while the Bonds remain Outstanding; O. to timely and expeditiously use all loan proceeds as required by federal statutes and EPA regulations,and in adherence to the project schedule approved by the Purchaser's Executive Administrator (which shall not be altered except for good cause shown and only with the written approval of the Purchaser's Executive Administrator); P. to not use any portion of the Bond proceeds,directly or indirectly,to acquire or to replace funds which were used,directly or indirectly,to acquire Nonpurpose Investments(as defined in Section 32 hereof) which produce a yield materially higher than the yield on the Purchaser's bonds that are used to provide the Purchaser with proceeds that it will use to purchase the Bonds(the Source Series Bonds),other than Nonpurpose Investments acquired with: (1) Proceeds of the Source Series Bonds invested for a reasonable temporary period of up to three (3)years(reduced by the period of investment by the Purchaser)until such proceeds are needed for the facilities to be financed; (2) Amounts invested in a bona fide debt service fund,within the meaning of§1.148- I(b)of the Regulations(as defined in Section 32 hereof); and (3) Amounts deposited in any reasonably required reserve or replacement fund to the extent such amounts do not exceed the least of maximum annual debt service on the Bonds, 125% of average annual debt service on the Bonds,or 10%of the stated principal amount(or,in the case of a discount,the issue price)of the Bonds; 138634808.3 -41- Q. to not acquire any of the Source Series Bonds in an amount related to the amount of the Bonds; R. to provide documentation that the all applicable State procurement requirements, as well as all federal procurement requirements,under the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises program are met; S. to provide a schedule prepared by an Engineer,specifying the useful life of the components of the project refinanced with Bond proceeds; T. the City will comply with the conditions included in the Purchaser's environmental finding, when issued; U. any proceeds from the Bonds that are determined to be surplus proceeds remaining after completion of the project financed with the Bond proceeds and completion of a final accounting in a manner approved by the Executive Administrator; V. that the City shall abide by all applicable construction contract requirements related to the use of iron and steel products produced in the United States, as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 2252, Subchapter G and Texas Water Code § 17.183; W. the City will provide for the accumulation of a reserve fund of no less than average annual debt service requirements, to be accumulated in equal monthly installments over the initial sixty (60) months following the issuance of the Bonds.The average annual debt service requirements on the Bonds is $[ 1 and such amount shall be so accumulated into the Reserve Fund by the deposit of monthly installments,made on or before the 20th day of each month following the month of delivery of the Bonds, of not less than 1/60th of the average annual debt service requirements on the Bonds; X. the City will refrain from using the proceeds of the Bonds to pay debt service on another issue of obligations of the borrower in contravention of section 149(d)of the Code; and Y. the Bonds shall be governed by the additional debt test and reserve requirement as provided in the currently outstanding "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2017"held by the Purchaser. SECTION 30. Application of Bond Proceeds. All proceeds from the sale of the Bonds shall be appropriated and,promptly upon receipt by the City,be applied as follows: A. An amount identified in instructions from any Authorized Official shall be deposited in the Construction Fund for the payment of certain costs of issuance relating to the Bonds and certain other costs relating to the improvement of the System and such amount may be deposited in the Escrow Agreement authorized by the provisions of Section 31 hereof. B. The amount identified in Section 14, if any, shall be deposited to the Reserve Fund to satisfy the increase in the Required Reserve Amount attributable to the issuance of the Bonds. Any proceeds of the Bonds remaining after making all such deposits and payments shall be deposited into the Bond Fund. SECTION 31. Authorization of Escrow Agreement. To the extent the hereinafter-described Escrow Agreement is required to comply with the Purchaser's requirements, the City Council of the City hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the execution of an Escrow 138634808.3 -42- Agreement to comply with the Purchaser's pre-design funding option rules and regulations. A copy of the Escrow Agreement is attached hereto, in substantially final form, as Exhibit B, and is incorporated by reference to the provisions of this Ordinance. Any Authorized Official,or his or her designee is authorized to execute the Escrow Agreement as the act and deed of the City Council. SECTION 32. Covenants to Maintain Tax—Exempt Status. A. Definitions. When used in this Section,the following terms have the following meanings: Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by all legislation, if any, effective on or before the Closing Date. Computation Date has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-I(b)of the Regulations. Gross Proceeds means any proceeds as defined in Section 1.148-1(b) of the Regulations, and any replacement proceeds as defined in Section 1.148-1(c)of the Regulations,of the Bonds. Investment has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-1(b)of the Regulations. Nonpurpose Investment means any investment property,as defined in section 148(b)of the Code, in which Gross Proceeds of the Bonds are invested and which is not acquired to carry out the governmental purposes of the Bonds. Rebate Amount has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-1(b)of the Regulations. Regulations means any proposed, temporary, or final Income Tax Regulations issued pursuant to sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code, and 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, which are applicable to the Bonds. Any reference to any specific Regulation shall also mean, as appropriate, any proposed, temporary or final Income Tax Regulation designed to supplement, amend or replace the specific Regulation referenced. Yield of (1) any Investment has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations; and (2) the Bonds means the yield on the Bonds,calculated in the manner set forth in Section 1.148-4 of the Regulations. B. Not to Cause Interest to Become Taxable. The City shall not use,permit the use of,or omit to use Gross Proceeds or any other amounts (or any property the acquisition, construction or improvement of which is to be financed directly or indirectly with Gross Proceeds)in a manner which if made or omitted, respectively,would cause the interest on any Bond to become includable in the gross income, as defined in section 61 of the Code, of the owner thereof for federal income tax purposes. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, unless and until the City receives a written opinion of counsel nationally recognized in the field of municipal bond law to the effect that failure to comply with such covenant will 138634808.3 -43- not adversely affect the exemption from federal income tax of the interest on any Bond, the City shall comply with each of the specific covenants in this Section. C. No Private Use or Private Payments. Except to the extent it will not cause the Bonds to become "private activity bonds" within the meaning of section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall at all times prior to the last Stated Maturity of Bonds: (1) exclusively own, operate and possess all property the acquisition, construction or improvement of which is to be financed or refinanced directly or indirectly with Gross Proceeds of the Bonds, and not use or permit the use of such Gross Proceeds (including all contractual arrangements with terms different than those applicable to the general public) or any property acquired, constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds in any activity carried on by any person or entity(including the United States or any agency,department and instrumentality thereof) other than a state or local government,unless such use is solely as a member of the general public; and (2) not directly or indirectly impose or accept any charge or other payment by any person or entity who is treated as using Gross Proceeds of the Bonds or any property the acquisition, construction or improvement of which is to be financed or refinanced directly or indirectly with such Gross Proceeds, other than taxes of general application within the City or interest earned on investments acquired with such Gross Proceeds pending application for their intended purposes. D. No Private Loan. Except to the extent it will not cause the Bonds to become "private activity bonds"within the meaning of section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder, the City shall not use Gross Proceeds of the Bonds, to make or finance loans to any person or entity other than a state or local government. For purposes of the foregoing covenant, such Gross Proceeds are considered to be"loaned"to a person or entity if. (1)property acquired,constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds is sold or leased to such person or entity in a transaction which creates a debt for federal income tax purposes; (2) capacity in or service from such property is committed to such person or entity under a take-or-pay, output or similar contract or arrangement; or (3) indirect benefits, or burdens and benefits of ownership,of such Gross Proceeds or any property acquired,constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds are otherwise transferred in a transaction which is the economic equivalent of a loan. E. Not to Invest at Higher Yield. Except to the extent it will not cause the Bonds to become "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall not at any time prior to the final Stated Maturity of the Bonds directly or indirectly invest Gross Proceeds in any Investment, if as a result of such investment the Yield of any Investment acquired with Gross Proceeds, whether then held or previously disposed of, materially exceeds the Yield of the Bonds. F. Not Federally Guaranteed. Except to the extent permitted by section 149(b) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall not take or omit to take any action which would 138634808.3 -44- cause the Bonds to be federally guaranteed within the meaning of section 149(b) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. G. Information Report. The City shall timely file the information required by section 149(e) of the Code with the Secretary of the Treasury on Form 8038-G or such other form and in such place as the Secretary may prescribe. H. Rebate of Arbitrage Profits. Except to the extent otherwise provided in section 148(f) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder: (1) The City shall account for all Gross Proceeds(including all receipts,expenditures and investments thereof) on its books of account separately and apart from all other funds (and receipts,expenditures and investments thereof)and shall retain all records of accounting for at least six years after the day on which the last Outstanding Bond is discharged. However, to the extent permitted by law, the City may commingle Gross Proceeds of the Bonds with other money of the City,provided that the City separately accounts for each receipt and expenditure of Gross Proceeds and the obligations acquired therewith. (2) Not less frequently than each Computation Date,the City shall calculate the Rebate Amount in accordance with rules set forth in section 148(f) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. The City shall maintain such calculations with its official transcript of proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds until six years after the final Computation Date. (3) As additional consideration for the purchase of the Bonds by the Purchasers and the loan of the money represented thereby and in order to induce such purchase by measures designed to insure the excludability of the interest thereon from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes, the City shall pay to the United States out of the Bond Fund or its general fund, as permitted by applicable Texas statute, regulation or opinion of the Attorney General of the State of Texas,the amount that when added to the future value of previous rebate payments made for the Bonds equals (i)in the case of a Final Computation Date as defined in Section 1.148-3(e)(2)of the Regulations,one hundred percent(100%)of the Rebate Amount on such date; and (ii) in the case of any other Computation Date,ninety percent(90%) of the Rebate Amount on such date. In all cases, the rebate payments shall be made at the times, in the installments,to the place and in the manner as is or may be required by section 148(f)of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder, and shall be accompanied by Form 8038-T or such other forms and information as is or may be required by section 148(f) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. (4) The City shall exercise reasonable diligence to assure that no errors are made in the calculations and payments required by paragraphs (2) and (3), and if an error is made, to discover and promptly correct such error within a reasonable amount of time thereafter(and in all events within one hundred eighty(180)days after discovery of the error),including payment to the United States of any additional Rebate Amount owed to it, interest thereon, and any penalty imposed under Section 1.148-3(h)of the Regulations. I. Not to Divert Arbitrage Profits. Except to the extent permitted by section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,the City shall not, at any time prior to the earlier of the Stated Maturity or final payment of the Bonds, enter into any transaction that reduces the amount required to be paid to the United States pursuant to Subsection H of this Section because such transaction results in a 138634808.3 -45- smaller profit or a larger loss than would have resulted if the transaction had been at arm's length and had the Yield of the Bonds not been relevant to either parry. J. Bonds Not Hedge Bonds. (1) The City reasonably expects to spend at least 85% of the spendable proceeds of such bonds within three years after the bonds are issued. (2) Not more than 50% of the proceeds of the Bonds will be invested in Nonpurpose Investments having a substantially guaranteed Yield for a period of four(4)years or more. K. Elections. The City hereby directs and authorizes the Authorized Official to make elections permitted or required pursuant to the provisions of the Code or the Regulations, as they deem necessary or appropriate in connection with the Bonds,in the Certificate as to Tax Exemption or similar or other appropriate certificate,form or document. Such elections shall be deemed to be made on the Closing Date. SECTION 33. Control and Custody of Bonds. The Mayor shall be and is hereby authorized to take and have charge of all necessary orders and records pending investigation by the Attorney General of the State of Texas and shall take and have charge and control of the Bonds pending their approval by the Attorney General of the State of Texas, the registration thereof by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas and the delivery of the Bonds to the Purchasers. Furthermore, each Authorized Official is hereby authorized and directed to furnish and execute such documents relating to the City and its financial affairs as may be necessary for the issuance of the Bonds,the approval of the Attorney General and their registration by the Comptroller of Public Accounts and, together with the City's Bond Counsel and the Paying Agent/Registrar, make the necessary arrangements for the delivery of the Initial Bond to the Purchasers. SECTION 34. Satisfaction of Obligation of Citv_.If the City shall pay or cause to be paid,or there shall otherwise be paid to the Holders, the principal of,premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, at the times and in the manner stipulated in this Ordinance, then the lien on and pledge of Senior Lien Pledged Revenues made under this Ordinance and all covenants, agreements, and other obligations of the City to the Holders shall thereupon cease,terminate, and be discharged and satisfied. The Bonds, or any principal amount(s) thereof, shall be deemed to have been paid within the meaning and with the effect expressed above in this Section when: (i)money sufficient to pay in full such Bonds or the principal amount(s) thereof at Stated Maturity or to the redemption date therefor, together with all interest due thereon, shall have been irrevocably deposited with and held in trust by the Paying Agent/Registrar, or an authorized escrow agent; and/or (ii) Government Securities shall have been irrevocably deposited in trust with the Paying Agent/Registrar, or an authorized escrow agent, which Government Securities mature as to principal and interest in such amounts and at such times as will insure the availability,without reinvestment, of sufficient money, together with any money deposited therewith, if any,to pay when due the principal of and interest on such Bonds, or the principal amount(s)thereof,on and prior to the Stated Maturity thereof or (if notice of redemption has been duly given or waived or if irrevocable arrangements therefor acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar have been made) the redemption date thereof. In the event of a defeasance of the Bonds,the City shall deliver a certificate from its financial advisor,the Paying Agent/Registrar,an independent accounting firm,or another qualified third party concerning the deposit of cash and/or Government Securities to pay, when due, the principal of, redemption premium (if any), and interest due on any defeased Bonds. To the extent applicable, if at all, the City covenants that no deposit of money or Government Securities will be made under this Section and 138634808.3 -46- no use made of any such deposit which would cause the Bonds to be treated as arbitrage bonds within the meaning of section 148 of the Code (as defined in Section 32 hereof). Any money so deposited with the Paying Agent/Registrar, and all income from Government Securities held in trust by the Paying Agent/Registrar, or an authorized escrow agent, pursuant to this Section which is not required for the payment of the Bonds,or any principal amount(s)thereof,or interest thereon with respect to which such money has been so deposited shall be remitted to the City or deposited as directed by the City. Furthermore, any money held by the Paying Agent/Registrar for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and remaining unclaimed for a period of three (3)years after the Stated Maturity,or applicable redemption date,of the Bonds such money was deposited and is held in trust to pay shall upon the request of the City be remitted to the City against a written receipt therefor,subject to the unclaimed property laws of the State of Texas. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, it is hereby provided that any determination not to redeem defeased Bonds that is made in conjunction with the payment arrangements specified in subsection (i) or (ii) above shall not be irrevocable, provided that: (1) in the proceedings providing for such defeasance, the City expressly reserves the right to call the defeased Bonds for redemption;(2)gives notice of the reservation of that right to the owners of the defeased Bonds immediately following the defeasance; (3) directs that notice of the reservation be included in any redemption notices that it authorizes; and (4) at the time of the redemption, satisfies the conditions of(i) or (ii) above with respect to such defeased debt as though it was being defeased at the time of the exercise of the option to redeem the defeased Bonds, after taking the redemption into account in determining the sufficiency of the provisions made for the payment of the defeased Bonds. SECTION 35. Ordinance a Contract, Amendments- Outstanding Bonds.The City acknowledges that the covenants and obligations of the City herein contained are a material inducement to the purchase of the Bonds. This Ordinance shall constitute a contract with the Holders from time to time,binding on the City and its successors and assigns,and it shall not be amended or repealed by the City so long as any Bond remains Outstanding except as permitted in this Section. The City may,without the consent of or notice to any Holders,from time to time and at any time,amend this Ordinance in any manner not detrimental to the interests of the Holders,including the curing of any ambiguity,inconsistency,or formal defect or omission herein. In addition, the City may, with the written consent of Holders holding a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding affected thereby, amend, add to, or rescind any of the provisions of this Ordinance; provided that, without the consent of all Holders of Outstanding Bonds, no such amendment, addition, or rescission shall (1)extend the time or times of payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds,reduce the principal amount thereof,the redemption price therefor,or the rate of interest thereon, or in any other way modify the terms of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, (2)give any preference to any Bond over any other Bond, or (3)reduce the aggregate principal amount of Bonds required for consent to any such amendment, addition,or rescission. SECTION 36. Printed Opinion. The Purchasers' obligation to accept delivery of the Bonds is subject to their being furnished a final opinion of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, as Bond Counsel, approving certain legal matters as to the Bonds, said opinion to be dated and delivered as of the date of initial delivery and payment for such Bonds. Printing of a true and correct copy of said opinion on the reverse side of each of said Bonds, with appropriate certificate pertaining thereto executed by facsimile signature of the City's Secretary is hereby approved and authorized. SECTION 37. CUSIP Numbers. CUSIP numbers may be printed or typed on the definitive Bonds. It is expressly provided,however,that the presence or absence of CUSIP numbers on the definitive Bonds shall be of no significance or effect as regards the legality thereof,and neither the City nor attorneys 138634808.3 -47- approving said Bonds as to legality are to be held responsible for CUSIP numbers incorrectly printed or typed on the definitive Bonds. SECTION 38. Effect of Headings. The Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof. SECTION 39. Benefits of Ordinance. Nothing in this Ordinance, expressed or implied, is intended or shall be construed to confer upon any person other than the City, Bond Counsel, Paying Agent/Registrar,and the Holders,any right,remedy,or claim,legal or equitable,under or by reason of this Ordinance or any provision hereof,this Ordinance and all its provisions being intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City, Bond Counsel, Financial Advisors,the Paying Agent/Registrar, and the Holders. SECTION 40. Inconsistent Provisions. All resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 41. Governing Law. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 42. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 43. Incorporation of Preamble Recitals. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. SECTION 44. Authorization of Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement. The City Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the execution of a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement concerning the payment, exchange, and transferability of the Bonds. A copy of the Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement is attached hereto, in substantially final form, as Exhibit A and is incorporated by reference to the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 45. Public Meeting. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time,place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting,including this Ordinance,was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended,Texas Government Code. SECTION 46. Continuing Disclosure of Information. A. Definitions. As used in this Section, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to such terms below: EMMA means the MSRB's Electronic Municipal Market Access system, accessible by the general public, without charge, on the internet through the uniform resource locator (URL) http://www.emma.msrb.org. 138634808.3 -48- Financial Obligation means a (a) debt obligation; (b) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or(c)guarantee of a debt obligation or any such derivative instrument;provided that"financial obligation" shall not include municipal securities (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as to which a final official statement(as defined in the Rule)has been provided to the MSRB consistent with the Rule. MSRB means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Rule means SEC Rule 15c2-12, as amended from time to time. SEC means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Undertaking means the City's continuing disclosure undertaking, described in subsections B through F below,hereunder accepted and entered into by the City for the purpose of compliance with the Rule. B. Annual Reports. The City shall file annually with the MSRB, (1)within six months after the end of each Fiscal Year of the City ending in or after 20[23], financial information and operating data with respect to the System of the general type described in Exhibit C hereto, and(2)if not provided as part such financial information and operating data, audited financial statements of the City, when and if available. Any financial statements so to be provided shall be (i) prepared in accordance with the accounting principles described in Exhibit C hereto,or such other accounting principles as the City may be required to employ from time to time pursuant to state law or regulation, and (ii) audited, if the City commissions an audit of such financial statements and the audit is completed within the period during which they must be provided. If the audit of such financial statements is not complete within such period, then the City shall file unaudited financial statements within such period and audited financial statements for the applicable Fiscal Year to the MSRB,when and if the audit report on such statements becomes available. If the City changes its Fiscal Year, it will file notice thereof with the MSRB of the change (and of the date of the new Fiscal Year end)prior to the next date by which the City otherwise would be required to provide financial information and operating data pursuant to this Section. C. Notice of Certain Events. The City shall file notice of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds to the MSRB in a timely manner and not more than 10 business days after occurrence of the event: (1) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) Non-payment related defaults,if material; (3) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (4) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (5) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers,or their failure to perform; (6) Adverse tax opinions,the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB), or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; 138634808.3 -49- (7) Modifications to rights of Holders of the Bonds,if material; (8) Bond calls,if material, and tender offers; (9) Defeasances; (10) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; (11) Rating changes; (12) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, or similar event of the City, which shall occur as described below; (13) The consummation of a merger,consolidation,or acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into of a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions,other than pursuant to its terms,if material; (14) Appointment of a successor or additional Paying Agent/Registrar or the change of name of a Paying Agent/Registrar,if material; (15) Incurrence of a Financial Obligation of the City, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which affect security holders,if material; and (16) Default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of the City, any of which reflect financial difficulties. For these purposes, (a) any event described in the immediately preceding paragraph (12) is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver,fiscal agent,or similar officer for the City in a proceeding under the United States Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement, or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City, and (b) the City intends the words used in the immediately preceding paragraphs (15) and (16) and the definition of Financial Obligation in this Section to have the same meanings as when they are used in the Rule,as evidenced by SEC Release No. 34-83885, dated August 20,2018. The City shall file notice with the MSRB,in a timely manner,of any failure by the City to provide financial information or operating data in accordance with this Section by the time required by this Section. D. Limitations, Disclaimers, and Amendments. The City shall be obligated to observe and perform the covenants specified in this Section for so long as,but only for so long as,the City remains an 138634808.3 -50- "obligated person" with respect to the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule, except that the City in any event will give notice of any deposit that causes the Bonds to be no longer Outstanding. The provisions of this Section are for the sole benefit of the Holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds,and nothing in this Section,express or implied,shall give any benefit or any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim hereunder to any other person. The City undertakes to provide only the financial information, operating data, financial statements, and notices which it has expressly agreed to provide pursuant to this Section and does not hereby undertake to provide any other information that may be relevant or material to a complete presentation of the City's financial results, condition, or prospects or hereby undertake to update any information provided in accordance with this Section or otherwise, except as expressly provided herein. The City does not make any representation or warranty concerning such information or its usefulness to a decision to invest in or sell Bonds at any future date. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE CITY BE LIABLE TO THE HOLDER OR BENEFICIAL OWNER OF ANY BOND OR ANY OTHER PERSON,IN CONTRACT OR TORT,FOR DAMAGES RESULTING IN WHOLE OR IN PART FROM ANY BREACH BY THE CITY,WHETHER NEGLIGENT OR WITH OR WITHOUT FAULT ON ITS PART,OF ANY COVENANT SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION,BUT EVERY RIGHT AND REMEDY OF ANY SUCH PERSON,IN CONTRACT OR TORT, FOR OR ON ACCOUNT OF ANY SUCH BREACH SHALL BE LIMITED TO AN ACTION FOR MANDAMUS OR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. No default by the City in observing or performing its obligations under this Section shall constitute a breach of or default under this Ordinance for purposes of any other provision of this Ordinance. Nothing in this Section is intended or shall act to disclaim,waive, or otherwise limit the duties of the City under federal and state securities laws. The provisions of this Section may be amended by the City from time to time to adapt to changed circumstances that arise from a change in legal requirements, a change in law, or a change in the identity, nature,status,or type of operations of the City,but only if(1)the provisions of this Section,as so amended, would have permitted an underwriter to purchase or sell Bonds in the primary offering of the Bonds in compliance with the Rule,taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule to the date of such amendment, as well as such changed circumstances, and (2)either (a)the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount (or any greater amount required by any other provision of this Ordinance that authorizes such an amendment) of the Outstanding Bonds consent to such amendment or(b) a person that is unaffiliated with the City(such as nationally recognized bond counsel)determines that such amendment will not materially impair the interests of the Holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds. The City may also repeal or amend the provisions of this Section if the SEC amends or repeals the applicable provisions of the Rule or any court of final jurisdiction enters judgment that such provisions of the Rule are invalid, and the City also may amend the provisions of this Section in its discretion in any other manner or circumstance,but in either case only if and to the extent that the provisions of this sentence would not have prevented an underwriter from lawfully purchasing or selling Bonds in the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to (a) such provisions as so amended and (b) any amendments or interpretations of the Rule. If the City so amends the provisions of this Section, the City shall include with any amended financial information or operating data next provided in accordance with this Section an explanation, in narrative form,of the reasons for the amendment and of the impact of any change in the type of financial information or operating data so provided. E. Information Format —Incorporation by Reference. The City information required under this Section shall be filed with the MSRB through EMMA in such format and accompanied by such identifying information as may be specified from time to time thereby. Under the current rules of the MSRB, continuing disclosure documents submitted to EMMA must be in word-searchable portable 138634808.3 -51- document format (PDF) files that permit the document to be saved, viewed,printed, and retransmitted by electronic means and the series of obligations to which such continuing disclosure documents relate must be identified by CUSIP number or numbers. Financial information and operating data to be provided pursuant to this Section may be set forth in full in one or more documents or may be included by specific reference to any document(including an official statement or other offering document) available to the public through EMMA or filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. F. General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance with the Rule. Because the issuance of the Bonds is subject to the provisions of the Rule and because the potential "underwriters"in a negotiated sale of the Bonds or the initial purchasers in a competitive sale of the Bonds may be subject to MSRB rules and regulations with respect to such sale (including certain due diligence and suitability requirements, among others), the City hereby adopts the General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance with the Rule (the Policies and Procedures), attached hereto as Exhibit E, with which the City shall follow to assure compliance with the Undertaking. The City has developed these Policies and Procedures for the purpose of meeting its requirements of the Undertaking and,in connection therewith, has sought the guidance from its internal staff charged with administering the City's financial affairs, its municipal or financial advisors, its legal counsel (including its Bond Counsel), and its independent accountants (to the extent determined to be necessary or advisable). The Policies and Procedures can be amended at the sole discretion of the City and any such amendment will not be deemed to be an amendment to the Undertaking. Each Authorized Official is hereby authorized to amend the Policies and Procedures as a result of a change in law,a future issuance of indebtedness subject to the Rule, or another purpose determined by the Authorized Official to be necessary or desirable for or with respect to future compliance with the Undertaking. SECTION 47. Book-Entry Onl S sem. The Bonds initially shall be registered so as to participate in a securities depository system (the DTC System) with the Depository Trust Company,New York,New York, or any successor entity thereto (DTC), as set forth herein. Each Stated Maturity of the Bonds shall be issued (following cancellation of the Initial Bond described in Section 7) in the form of a separate single definitive Bond. Upon issuance,the ownership of each such Bond shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC, and all of the Outstanding Bonds shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC. The City and the Paying Agent/Registrar are authorized to execute, deliver, and take the actions set forth in such letters to or agreements with DTC as shall be necessary to effectuate the DTC System, including the Letter of Representations attached hereto as Exhibit D(the Representation Letter). With respect to the Bonds registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC,the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any broker-dealer, bank, or other financial institution for which DTC holds the Bonds from time to time as securities depository(a Depository Participant) or to any person on behalf of whom such a Depository Participant holds an interest in the Bonds (an Indirect Participant). Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to (i)the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co., or any Depository Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii)the delivery to any Depository Participant or any other person,other than a registered owner of the Bonds,as shown on the Security Register,of any notice with respect to the Bonds,including any notice of redemption, or (iii)the delivery to any Depository Participant or any Indirect Participant or any other Person, other than a Holder of a Bond, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. While in the DTC System, no person other than Cede & Co., or any successor thereto, as nominee for DTC, shall receive a bond certificate evidencing the obligation of the City to make 138634808.3 -52- payments of principal,premium,if any, and interest pursuant to this Ordinance. Upon delivery by DTC to the Paying Agent/Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., and subject to the provisions in this Ordinance with respect to interest checks or drafts being mailed to the Holder, the word "Cede & Co." in this Ordinance shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. In the event that (a) the City determines that DTC is incapable of discharging its responsibilities described herein and in the Representation Letter, (b)the Representation Letter shall be terminated for any reason,or(c)DTC or the City determines that it is in the best interest of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they be able to obtain certificated Bonds,the City shall notify the Paying Agent/Registrar, DTC, and the Depository Participants of the availability within a reasonable period of time through DTC of bond certificates, and the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. However,the City will not discontinue the use of DTC without prior notice and consent of the Purchaser for so long as the Purchaser is the Holder of any of the Bonds. At that time,the City may determine that the Bonds shall be registered in the name of and deposited with a successor depository operating a securities depository system, as may be acceptable to the City, or such depository's agent or designee, and if the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar do not select such alternate securities depository system then the Bonds may be registered in whatever name or names the Holders of Bonds transferring or exchanging the Bonds shall designate,in accordance with the provisions hereof. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given,respectively,in the manner provided in the Representation Letter. SECTION 48. Further Procedures. The officers and employees of the City are hereby authorized, empowered and directed from time to time and at any time to do and perform all such acts and things and to execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name and under the corporate seal and on behalf of the City all such instruments,whether or not herein mentioned, as may be necessary or desirable in order to carry out the terms and provisions of this Ordinance, the initial sale and delivery of the Bonds, the Agreement, the Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement, and the application to the Purchaser. In addition, prior to the initial delivery of the Bonds, each Authorized Official and Bond Counsel are hereby authorized and directed to approve any technical changes or corrections to this Ordinance or to any of the instruments authorized and approved by this Ordinance necessary in order to (i)correct any ambiguity or mistake or properly or more completely document the transactions contemplated and approved by this Ordinance, (ii) obtain a rating from any of the national bond rating agencies, or (iii) obtain the approval of the Bonds by the Texas Attorney General's office. In case any officer of the City whose signature shall appear on any certificate shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of such certificate, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if such officer had remained in office until such delivery. SECTION 49. Unavailability of Authorized Publication. If, because of the temporary or permanent suspension of any newspaper,journal, or other publication, or for any reason, publication of notice cannot be made meeting any requirements herein established,any notice required to be published by the provisions of this Ordinance shall be given in such other manner and at such time or times as in the judgment of the City or of the Paying Agent/Registrar shall most effectively approximate such required publication and the giving of such notice in such manner shall for all purposes of this Ordinance be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements for publication thereof. SECTION 50. No Recourse Against City Officials. No recourse shall be had for the payment of principal of,premium,if any,or interest on any Bond or for any claim based thereon or on this Ordinance against any official of the City or any person executing any Bond. 138634808.3 -53- SECTION 51. Automatic Budget Amendments to Reflect Final Debt Service Pam. To the extent that the City Council has adopted an annual budget that includes payment of debt service on any Bonds issued (or to be issued)pursuant to this Ordinance based on the City's reasonable expectations and projections relative to those Bonds,such budget entries shall,upon the issuance of Bonds,be automatically adjusted to reflect actual debt service payments on those Bonds coming due during the period of time covered by such budget. The Authorized Official, or the designee thereof, is authorized to make such necessary budget entries and/or adjustments to reflect these final debt service amounts. SECTION 52. Covenants of Compliance. The City shall faithfully and punctually perform all duties with reference to the System required by the Act, all other applicable laws of the State of Texas,and the provisions of this Ordinance and that the City shall render no free service to any customers or other persons. SECTION 53. Application to Texas Water Development Board. The City Council ratifies and confirms its prior approval of the form and content of the Application to the Texas Water Development Board (the Application) prepared in connection with the sale of the Bonds to the Purchaser and hereby approves the form and content of any addenda, supplement,or amendment thereto. SECTION 54. Authorization of a Financing Agreement with the Texas Water Development Board. The City Council authorizes the execution of a Financing Agreement between the City and the Purchaser in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G. Each Authorized Official is hereby authorized to finalize the Financing Agreement with the Purchaser and to approve any amendments or revisions to the Financing Agreement. Additionally,each Authorized Official is authorized to execute and submit the Financing Agreement to the Purchaser and appear before the Purchaser, along with Bond Counsel,Financial Advisor, and consulting engineers. SECTION 55. Construction of Terms. If appropriate in the context of this Ordinance, words of the singular number shall be considered to include the plural,words of the plural number shall be considered to include the singular, and words of the masculine, feminine, or neuter gender shall be considered to include the other genders. SECTION 56. Ancillary Bond Contracts. Though such parties may be identified, and the entry into a particular form of contract may be authorized herein, the City Council hereby delegates to each Authorized Official the authority to independently select the counterparty to any agreement with any paying agent/registrar,rating agency, securities depository,escrow agent, or any other contract that is determined by an Authorized Official, the City's Financial Advisor, or the City's Bond Counsel to be necessary or incidental to the issuance of the Bonds as long as each of such contracts has a value of less than the amount referenced in Section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code (collectively, the Ancillary Bond Contracts); and,as necessary,to execute the Ancillary Bond Contracts on behalf and as the act and deed of the City. The City Council has not participated in the selection of any of the business entities which are counterparties to the Ancillary Bond Contracts. SECTION 57. City's Consent to Provide Information and Documentation to the Texas MAC. The Municipal Advisory Council of Texas (the Texas AMC), a non-profit membership corporation organized exclusively for non-profit purposes described in section 501(c)(6)of the Internal Revenue Code and which serves as a comprehensive financial information repository regarding municipal debt issuers in Texas, requires provision of written documentation regarding the issuance of municipal debt by the issuers thereof. In support of the purpose of the Texas MAC and in compliance with applicable law, the City hereby consents to and authorizes the Authorized Official, the City's Bond Counsel, and/or the City's Financial Advisor to provide to the Texas MAC information and documentation requested by the Texas MAC relating to the Bonds; provided, however, that no such information and documentation shall be provided prior to 138634808.3 -54- the Closing Date. This consent and authorization relates only to information and documentation that is a part of the public record concerning the issuance of the Bonds. SECTION 58. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 138634808.3 -55- SIGNED AND SEALED THIS DAY OF ,2024. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (SEAL) APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2024: Miles Risley, City Attorney Signature page to the Ordinance S-1 THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTIES OF NUECES, § ARANSAS,KLEBERG,AND § SAN PATRICIO § CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI § I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the day of , 2024, authorizing the issuance of one or more series of the City's Utility System Senior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, which ordinance is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public,and public notice of the time,place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City,this the DAY OF ,2024. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) Signature page to the Ordinance S-2 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of ,2024,by the following vote: Paulette Guajardo Jim Klein Roland Barrera Mike Pusley Sylvia Campos Everett Roy Gil Hernandez Dan Suckley Michael Hunter That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of 2024,by the following vote: Paulette Guajardo Jim Klein Roland Barrera Mike Pusley Sylvia Campos Everett Roy Gil Hernandez Dan Suckley Michael Hunter PASSED AND APPROVED,this the day of ,2024. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Paulette Guajardo City Secretary Mayor Signature page to the Ordinance S-3 INDEX TO SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS Schedule I .....................Approval Certificate Exhibit A.......................Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement Exhibit B.......................Escrow Agreement Exhibit C.......................Description of Annual Financial Infonnation Exhibit D....................... DTC Letter of Representations Exhibit E.......................General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance With the Rule Exhibit F................Form of Reimbursement Agreement Exhibit G................Financing Agreement Index-I SCHEDULEI Approval Certificate See Tab No. 138634808.3 Schedule 11-1 EXHIBIT A Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement See Tab No. 138634808.3 A-1 EXHIBIT B Escrow Agreement See Tab No. 138634808.3 B-1 EXHIBIT C Description of Annual Financial Information The following information is referred to in Section 46 of this Ordinance. Annual Financial Statements and Operating Data The financial information and operating data with respect to the City to be provided annually in accordance with such Section are as specified (and included in the Appendix or under the headings of the Application referred to)below: The City's audited financial statements for the most recently concluded Fiscal Year or to the extent these audited financial statements are not available, the portion of the unaudited financial statements of the City referenced in the Application, but for the most recently concluded Fiscal Year. Accounting Principles The accounting principles referred to in such Section are the accounting principles described in the notes to the financial statements referred to above. 138634808.3 C-I EXHIBIT D DTC Letter of Representations See Tab No. 138634808.3 D-1 EXHIBIT E General Policies and Procedures Concerning Compliance with the Rule I. Capitalized terms used in this Exhibit have the meanings ascribed thereto in Section 46 of the Ordinance. Bonds refer to the Bonds that are the subject of the Ordinance to which this Exhibit is attached. II. As a capital markets participant, the City is aware of its continuing disclosure requirements and obligations existing under the Rule prior to February 27, 2019, the effective date of the most recent amendment to the Rule (the Effective Date), and has implemented and maintained internal policies, processes,and procedures to ensure compliance therewith. Adherence to these internal policies,processes, and procedures has enabled underwriters in non-exempt negotiated sales and initial purchasers in non- exempt competitive sales to comply with their obligations arising under various MSRB rules and regulations concerning due diligence and findings of suitability, among other matters,regarding the City's compliance with the Rule. III. The City is aware that the Rule was amended as of the Effective Date (the Rule Amendment) and has accommodated this amendment by adding subparagraphs(15)and(16)to Section 46C of the Ordinance, which provisions are a part of the Undertaking. IV. The City is aware that "participating underwriters" (as such term is defined in the Rule) of the Bonds must make inquiry and reasonably believe that the City is likely to comply with the Undertaking and that the standards for determining compliance have increased over time as a result of, among others, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative and regulatory commentary relating to the effectiveness of the Rule Amendment. V. The City now establishes the following general policies and procedures (the Policies and Procedures) for satisfying its obligations pursuant to the Undertaking,which policies and procedures have been developed based on the City's informal policies, procedures, and processes utilized prior to the Effective Date for compliance with the City's obligations under the Rule,the advice from and discussions with the City's internal senior staff(including staff charged with administering the City's financial affairs), its co-municipal or financial advisors, its legal counsel (including Bond Counsel), and its independent accountants,to the extent determined to be necessary or advisable (collectively,the Compliance Team): I. The Director of Finance and Procurement (the Compliance Officer) shall be responsible for satisfying the City's obligations pursuant to the Undertaking through adherence to these Policies and Procedures; 2. the Compliance Officer shall establish reminder or"tickler"systems to identify and timely report to the MSRB, in the format thereby prescribed from time to time, the City's information of the type described in Section 46B of the Ordinance; 3. the Compliance Officer shall promptly determine the occurrence of any of the events described in Section 46C of the Ordinance; 4. the Compliance Officer shall work with external consultants of the City, as and to the extent necessary,to timely prepare and file with the MSRB the annual information of the City and notice of the occurrence of any of the events referenced in Clauses 2 and 3 above, respectively, the foregoing being required to satisfy the terms of the Undertaking; 138634808.3 E-I 5. the Compliance Officer shall establish a system for identifying and monitoring any Financial Obligations,whether now existing or hereafter entered into by the City,and(upon identification) determining if such Financial Obligation has the potential to materially impact the security or source of repayment of the Bonds; 6. upon identification of any Financial Obligation meeting the materiality standard identified in Clause 5 above,the Compliance Officer shall establish a process for identifying and monitoring any City agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms under such Financial Obligation; 7. the Compliance Officer shall establish a process for identifying the occurrence of any default, event of acceleration,termination event,modification of terms,or other similar events under the terms of any Financial Obligation,the occurrence of any of which reflect financial difficulties of the City; and 8. the Compliance Officer shall annually review these Policies and Procedures with the remainder of the Compliance Team, make any modifications on an internal document retained by the Compliance Officer and available to any "participating underwriter" (as defined in the Rule), if requested, and on the basis of this annual review (to the extent determined to be necessary or desirable), seek additional training for herself or himself, as well as other members of the City's internal staff identified by the Compliance Officer to assist with the City's satisfaction of the terms and provisions of the Undertaking. 138634808.3 E-2 EXHIBIT F Form of Reimbursement Agreement Not applicable 138634808.3 F-I EXHIBIT G Financing Agreement 138634808.3 G-1 SC O , F NoAPORpY�° AGENDA MEMORANDUM xss2 First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 30, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Drew Molly P.E, Chief Operations Officer for Corpus Christi Water d rew m(a)cctexas.co rrr (361) 826-1853 Alma Iris Casas, Assistant Director of Financial Services almac(a)-cctexas.com (361) 826-3610 Ordinance authorizing the execution of all documents necessary to apply and accept the U.S Bureau of Reclamation's Grants CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the execution of all documents necessary to apply for and accept the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Grants for the construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant; and appropriating funds. SUMMARY: Ordinance will authorize the execution of all documents necessary to apply to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) Grant Programs and to submit the application. The application process consists of submitting a Feasibility Study Report no later than 60 days from an application's submittal period deadline. Reclamation grant programs range from $30 Million to $180 Million for eligible projects. Ordinance also authorizes acceptance of the grant, if awarded, and appropriating the funds. Before funding may be awarded, Reclamation must review the Feasibility Study Report and determine that it meets the requirements in Reclamation's Directives and Standards. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: In 1992, The Federal Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act authorized Reclamation to provide grant financial assistance for desalination construction projects. Eligibility for this grant program requires the completion of a feasibility study report. Ultimate approval of a feasibility study and its compliance is given by Reclamation. On October 31 , 2023, the City Council approved an Ordinance authorizing a professional services contract with Freese and Nichols, Corpus Christi, to perform engineering services for the United States Bureau of Reclamation Grant Program in an amount not to exceed $220,517.00 for the preparation of the feasibility study report. The report will comply with all of Reclamations' Directives and Standards. Through the grant programs, Reclamation can provide up to 25% of an eligible project for planning and construction and can range from $30 Million to $180 Million for eligible projects. Reclamations' objectives are to provide funding for water projects because they play an important role in helping communities develop local, drought-resistant sources of water supply by turning currently unusable water sources into a new source of water supply that is less vulnerable to drought and climate change. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative to not submitting an application is that the City will need to pay 100% of the total project cost or find alternative funding sources. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact could range from $30 million to $180 million of grant funding for the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance authorizing execution of all documents necessary to apply for and accept the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Grants for the construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant; appropriating funds. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. The City Council authorizes execution of all documents necessary for submission of the grant applications to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project. SECTION 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept grants from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. SECTION 3. An amount up to $180,000,000.00 is appropriated in the Water CIP Fund 4080. SECTION 4. The City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Chief Operating Officer and the City Manager's designee are authorized to execute contractual documents between the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and City. SECTION 5. The Director of Finance & Business Analysis, Controller, and the City Manager's designee are authorized to execute financial documents between the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the City. Introduced and voted on the day of , 2024. PASSED and APPROVED on the day of , 2024. ATTEST: Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary �o o& AGENDA MEMORANDUM NCORPOR 1�'0 First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 1852 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 30, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P.E., Director of Engineering Services 6effreye(a-)-cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Drew Molly P.E, Director of Water Systems and Support Services drewmCa)-cctexas.com (361) 826-1853 Ordinance authorizing the Execution of all Documents with American Electric Power Associated with the Construction of the Interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the Electric Transmission Grid CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the execution of all documents with American Electric Power, Texas, associated with construction of the interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the Electric Council of Texas electric transmission grid in the amount of $3,062,880, and for the conveyance of property rights and/or modifications of existing contracts for the purchase of real property to transfer interest(s) in property as required by American Electric Power, Texas or its authorized related entities for the construction of said project, located in Council District 1 with FY 2024 funding available from the City's State Water Implementation Revenue Fund Texas Loan-2020. SUMMARY: This Ordinance authorizes the execution of all documents with AEP Texas associated with construction of the interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the electric transmission grid in the amount of $3,062,880 and conveyance of property rights and/or modifications of existing contracts for the purchase of real property to transfer interest(s) in property as required by AEP located in Council District 1 with FY 2024 funding available from the City's State Water Implementation Revenue Fund Texas Loan-2020. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: AEP Texas delivers electricity to over one million electric meters, serving homes, businesses, and industries in south and west Texas. AEP Texas provides regulated energy delivery service to consumers, regardless of which Retail Electric Provider (REP) they choose. The region headquarters is in Corpus Christi. AEP Texas also builds new powerlines, restores service following outages and uses advanced meters to record electric use for REPs throughout its service territory. On May 24, 2024, Council authorized a professional services agreement with AEP Texas to provide preliminary engineering and regulatory work associated with interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the ERCOT electric transmission grid. The Study set forth the terms and conditions under which AEP Texas will connect the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the ERCOT electric transmission grid as well as preliminary engineering and design of 138 kilovolt (kV) infrastructure necessary to provide electric service. The exact conveyance and/or modifications of real property will be negotiated with AEP and to be determined. The interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the ERCOT grid will require the construction of a new 138 kV transmission line(s) and a newly constructed 138 kV substation. The study included preliminary engineering and design of 138 kV infrastructure necessary to provide electric service to the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant. The findings of the Study showed favorable conditions for the City, as the 138 kV power infrastructure would be utilized by neighboring AEP customers and would allow the City to only pay approximately one fifth of the total cost of construction. Total construction cost is$16,719,288 to which the City will contribute $3,062,880. PROJECT TIMELINE: Construction of the 138 kV power infrastructure will commence once the contract is executed. ALTERNATIVES: An alternative is to not proceed with the authorization which will delay the construction of the 138 kV power infrastructure and ultimately delay the Project. EP Texas is the owner and operator of electric delivery infrastructure in our area, staff finds no equal measures available and is unable to recommend alternatives that are not in the best interest of public safety. FISCAL IMPACT: This fiscal impact for FY 2024 is an amount of $3,062,880 for preliminary design, with funding available from the City's State Water Implementation Fund Texas Loan-2020. FUNDING DETAIL: This project is listed in the FY 2024 Capital Improvement Program. Fund: 2020C SWIRFT Bd (Fund 4483) Dept: Water (045) Project: Seawater Desalination (Project No. E15117) Account: Design / Outside Consultants (550950) Activity: E15117-01-4483-EXP Amount: $3,062,880.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the authorization to execute all documents with American Electric Power, Texas, associated with construction of the interconnection of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant to the Electric Council of Texas electric transmission grid in the amount of $3,062,880 and the conveyance of property rights and/or modifications of existing contracts for the purchase of real property to transfer interest(s) in property as required by AEP or its authorized related entities. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: AEP Study Ordinance Project Map Ordinance authorizing execution of all documents with American Electric Power, Texas (AEP), associated with the construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Interconnection Project in the amount of $3,062,880.00 and conveyance of property rights and/or modifications of existing contracts for the purchase of real property to transfer interest(s) in property as required by AEP or its authorized related entities for the construction of said project, located in Council District 1. WHEREAS, there is a statutory exception for this procurement in Local Government Code, Section 252.022 (2) (7) (C), items that are available from only one source, including gas, water and other utility services. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. The City Council specifically finds that the foregoing statements included in the preamble of this ordinance are true and correct and adopts such findings for all intents and purposes related to the authorization of this procurement. SECTION 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents with American Electric Power, Texas (AEP), associated with the construction of the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Interconnection Project in the amount of $3,062,880.00. SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to convey property rights and/or modify existing contracts for the purchase of real property to transfer interest(s) in property as required by AEP or its authorized related entities for the construction of said project. Introduced and voted on the day of , 2024. PASSED and APPROVED on the day of , 2024. ATTEST: Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary SC O , F NoAPORpY° AGENDA MEMORANDUM xss2 First Read Ordinance for the City Council Meeting January 23, 2024 Second Read Ordinance for the City Council Meeting January 30, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services 6effreye(a)cctexas.corr. (361) 826-3851 Drew Molly P.E, Chief Operations Officer for Corpus Christi Water drewm(a-)-cctexas.com (361) 826-1853 Josh Chronley, CTCD, Assistant Director of Finance & Procurement 0oshc2(o-)-cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Master Services Agreement Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing amendment number three to the Master Services Agreement with Freese and Nichols in an amount up to $3,779,994 for to the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project for Procurement Support Services for a total amount not to exceed $9,033,994; appropriating $3,779,994 from the Raw Water and Drought Surcharge funds reserve balances; and amending the FY 2024 Capital and Operating Budgets. SUMMARY: Ordinance approving amendment number three to the Master Services Agreement (MSA) with Freese and Nichols in an amount up to $3,779,994 for to the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project for Procurement Support Services for a total amount of$9,033,994; and appropriating $3,779,994 into the Raw Water and Drought Surcharge CIP fund reserve and amending the FY 2024 Capital and Operating Budgets; and determining all costs attributable to Raw Water. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: In 2014, the City issued a request for qualifications for an Owner's Representative and technical subject expert team to assist in the development of seawater desalination program from conceptual development through the selection of a desalination project contractor and final commissioning and delivery of seawater desalination facilities. The City selected and contracted FNI as the Owner Representative for its Seawater Desalination Program. In November 2017, an MSA was executed with FNI encompassing all phases of the Project, including selecting a project procurement and delivery method and preparing and assisting in the development and implementation of a qualifications-based procurement of a design-build contractor. The City Council approved the initial MSA budget on its second reading on September 19, 2017, by Ordinance No.031249. Previous task authorizations associated with the MSA included the seawater desalination plant siting, permit applications, infrastructure integration planning, survey, and other required effort to progress the project toward an ultimate objective of collaborative delivery which is the procurement phase of the Project. Below is the summary list of items in progress and completed. Number On-going or Completed Tasks 1 Project Procurement Methodology 2 Concentrate Management Strategies 3 Seawater Desalination Project Siting 4 Site Surveys and Studies 5 Source Water Characterization 6 Confirmation of Plant Size, Water Users,Water Demand, and Points of Product Water Delivery 7 Infrastructure Integration Plan 8 Conceptual Design of Intake and Outfall Facilities 9 Power Supply Agreement 10 Project Delivery Technical Strategy 11 Filing of Owner's Permit Applications 12 Supplemental Project Definition Summary Report and Project Procurement Plan 13 TWDB Financial Assistance (SWIFT #1) 14 Project Management, Meetings, and Coordination A Additional Service - Communications and Public Outreach In 2023 and 2024, Corpus Christi Engineering Services, Corpus Christi Water, and the FNI Team engaged in a selection process for the collaborative delivery method for the Project. Consistent with the Texas Statutes, the delivery method has been documented through a determination of best value. The City has accepted the recommendation of a progressive design build approach for the procurement method of the project. This proposed MSA amendment will authorize effort for the procurement phase including the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Request for Proposals (RFP). Progressive Design Build is the selected procurement method for the project. State Statutes require a two-step procurement process based on the qualifications of proposers. This amendment to the MSA will help the City fulfill these requirements and select a progressive design-build partner for the implementation of the project. This ordinance will approve amendment number three to the MSA with Freese and Nichols in an amount up to $3,779,994 for to the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project for Procurement Support Services for a total amount of$9,033,994; and appropriating $3,779,994 into the Raw Water and Drought Surcharge CIP fund reserve and amending the FY 2024 Capital and Operating Budgets; and determining all costs attributable to Raw Water. The scope of work for amendment number three is summarized in the following tasks: TASK 1: Project Administration, Meetings, Management Description: Anticipated project coordination activities may include but are not limited to the following: 1. Project Kick-off Meeting to include clarification of the desired outcomes and provide the City input into the development of the project work plan, list of input and data required from FNI and the City, the project contacts and the list of deliverables which will allow for the timely completion of the P-DB Procurement. 2. Preparation and ongoing coordination of Project Work Plan. 3. Preparation and ongoing coordination of Project Schedule. 4. Up to weekly project status "Look Ahead" meetings with the City. These will typically be by teleconference and include discussion of project status and upcoming project items/issues. 5. Preparation, facilitation, and documentation for weekly Procurement Team meetings for the Project Lead Team, Procurement Team, Engineering & Operations Team, and Legal Team. 6. Timely identification, discussion, and resolution of change issues. 7. Monthly preparation invoices and progress reports. 8. Participation in additional meetings with City Senior Management or City Council. 9. Presentations or reports to the City Council, City Senior Management, and other stakeholders. 10. Early initiation consultation with regulatory agencies on time-critical permit applications, if requested. 11. Additional architectural concept renderings, drone operations, coordination, and imagery, and visualization software adaptation of the existing 3D architectural concept. TASK 2: Develop Progressive Design Build Project (P-DB) Strategy Description: A key element of our approach is to conduct a strategy session to set the overall project risk philosophy, begin to finalize the Project's definition, and direction. We propose to provide personnel experienced in P-DB procurements and contract development, desalination design procedures and practices, and facilitation to conduct a strategy session. 2.1 Project Strategy Session The FNI Team will facilitate an up to two (2) day Strategy Session with the City management and staff and project personnel for the purpose of developing a strategy to finalize the project development definition and to establish the fundamental elements of the procurement process. The FNI Team will provide personnel with P-DB procurement, seawater desalination project development and commercial terms development expertise for the Strategy Session. The FNI Team will prepare a Strategy Session Technical Memorandum of relevant findings, decisions, and outcomes focused on the following elements: 1. Procurement and Legal 2. Site Documentation 3. Desalination Facility's Project Definition a) Capacity (Initial and Full Build-out) b) Raw water quality c) Concentrate disposal d) Product Water quality 4. Seawater Intake a) Capacity b) Existing Hydrogeologic Modeling c) Existing Water Quality Analysis/ Modeling 5. Concentrate Discharge 6. Offsite Utilities; Power and Wastewater 7. Product Water Point of Connection (POC) to Distribution System 8. Pipeline Design Considerations 9. Project Component (e.g., offsite pipelines) Procurement Options 10. Preliminary Estimate of Probable Project Cost 11. Project Cost Validation 12. Project Funding 13. Project Milestones/The City Approvals 14. Defining Additional Site Data needs 15. Existing Raw Water Characterization 16. Defining Additional Water Quality Data Needs 17. Product Water Quality Requirements 18. Pilot Testing Approach 19. Project Schedule a) Design Criteria Package b) Request for Qualifications (RFQ)/Request for Proposals (RFP) c) Off-site Pipeline design d) Land -ROW Acquisition e) AEP Electric Company interfaces and upgrades 20. Permit List/Permitting Strategy 21. Procurement Process a) Pre-Solicitation Notice b) Request For Expressions of Interest (RFEI) c) Vendor Industry Day d) RFQ e) Contractor Input f) Evaluation Criteria g) Term Sheet h) Evaluation Committee i) RFP j) Draft P-DB Agreement k) One-on-One Confidential Meetings 1) Evaluation Criteria m) Negotiation 22. Design Criteria Approach — Prescriptive Specifications vs. Performance Specifications and mandatory City standards 23. P-DB Agreement Development 24. Public Involvement Program 25. Project's Critical Path 26. Issue Resolution 27. Schedule Follow-up Project Workgroup meetings 2.2 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation 1. Prepare for and facilitate up to three Risk Workshops 2. Develop and maintain a risk register and risk matrix to serve as the template for risk allocation in the contract documents. This will include, but is not limited to, consideration for the following: a. Permitting b. Schedule c. Supply Chain d. Treatment Technologies e. Raw Water Quality f. Finished Water Quality g. Right-of-Way h. Infrastructure Integration i. Environmental Compliance and Mitigation j. Public Perception k. Legal and Administrative Requirements 1. Special Materials m. Cost Escalation n. Utility Coordination o. Plant Operations p. Project Funding 2.3 Prepare Draft and Final Project Definition for Use in the RFQ and RFP The FNI Team will develop a draft and final Project Definition. 1. Plan and facilitate up to four meetings with the City and stakeholders (TCEQ, TWDB, etc.) to develop, deliver, and receive City approval of the Project Definition 2. Provide a draft and final Technical Memorandum (TM) including: a. Project Strategy and Work Plan b. Establishing key design requirements c. Identifying necessary performance and technical standards d. An outline of the Design Criteria Package (DCP) and a determination of which DCP elements will be included in the RFQ. i. Elements of the DCP may include, as applicable, budget or cost estimates, information on the site, performance criteria, special materials requirements, initial design calculations, known utilities, capacity requirements, quality assurance and quality control requirements, the type, size, and location of structures, and notice of any ordinances, rules, or goals adopted by the governmental entity relating to awarding contracts to historically underutilized businesses (HUB). e. Schedule f. Definition of project roles and responsibilities g. Critical project features h. Approach to risk management i. Performance Standards required for the RFP j. Geotechnical Baseline Report Task 2 Deliverables Strategy Session Workbook Strategy Session Technical Memorandum Geotechnical Baseline Report Draft and Final Risk Matrix Draft and Final Preliminary Project Definition Technical Memorandum TASK 3: Procurement Framework Development Description: Another key element of our approach is to develop a Framework document and a Statement of Principles to define the scope and content of procurement documents. 3.1 Develop Procurement Framework The FNI Team will develop a P-DB procurement framework based on the strategy document that serves as a detailed "road map" to define the scope and content of the RFQ/RFP documents. Elements of the framework document will include: 1. Draft Statement of Principles 2. Draft Outline of the RFQ and RFP and its attachments. 3. Outline of Performance or Technical Specifications in Design Criteria Package as outlined in 2.3 (2) (d). 4. Permit Schedule. Regulatory agencies and permits required will be confirmed, and a schedule of agency coordination meetings will be developed for non-P-DB permit activities consistent with the permit strategy. 5. Risk Matrix. The risk matrix developed in Task 2.2 will identify the elements and allocation of risk with respect to: a) Risk Type b) Description c) Potential Impact d) Allocation (The City, P-DB contractor, shared) 6. Draft Term Sheet. In conjunction with the City's legal counsel a Summary of the Project's Key Risk Management Terms for P-DB Agreement will be developed. 7. Draft Procurement Schedule for the P-DB Procurement and P-DB Agreement and Project will be developed. It will consider the following activities: ACTIVITY Initial strategy in preparation for procurement Third-party meetings and third-party agreement preparation Prepare Pre-Procurement Notice Issue Pre-Procurement Notice to Industry Pre-Procurement Notice Responses Due Risk Workshop Industry forum and pre-procurement meeting Prepare RFQ Issue RFQ Pre-Submittal meeting SOQs Due SOQ Evaluation Shortlist announced Prepare RFP Documents Pre-Submittal one-on-one meetings with each shortlisted firm Issue draft RFP to shortlist Proposals due Proposal evaluation Best Qualified Respondent announced Negotiations with best qualified Respondent P-DB Agreement Execution NTP 1 issued for Design P-DB Phase 1 Validation Period Completed P-DB Phase 2A -LNTP Construction NTP 2B issued for construction Mechanical or Substantial Completion Acceptance and Turnover 8. Draft Procurement Schedule for the P-DB Procurement and P-DB Agreement and Project will be developed. It will consider the following activities: Release RFQ March/April 2024 Shortlist Respondents and Issue RFP July/August 2024 Receive Proposals August/September 2024 Develop Ranking and Begin Negotiations September/October 2024 Task 3 Deliverables Draft and Final Statement of Principles City Council Briefing Documents Task 4.0: Request for Qualification Process Description: During this stage of the Project the RFQ and the RFP will be under development simultaneously. The FNI Team will develop the draft and final RFQ and Draft RFP, the Design Criteria Package, the P-DB Term Sheet, and draft P-DB Agreement. The P-DB approach will allow P-DB Contractor to innovate within the provisions of the Design Criteria Package. 4.1 Develop RFQ Package The FNI Team will develop pre-qualification selection criteria and prepare a draft RFQ and draft DCP for review by the City. This process will be consistent with the requirements of Texas Government Code Section 2269. 1. The RFQ will be developed and based on the Statement of Principles and draft DCP. The final RFQ may contain the following sections: a) Introduction and General Information b) Description of the Project c) Procurement Process and Schedule d) Vendor Shortlisting Evaluation Criteria to be developed as part of the procurement process in collaboration with the Evaluation Committee. A detailed grading matrix will be provided for review during the RFQ draft process. e) Respondent Team Organization, Qualifications and Experience Submittal Requirements f) Reference Submittal Requirements g) Business and Financial Submittal Requirements h) Request for Comments i) P-DB Agreement— Preliminary Term Sheet 2. The draft RFQ will be submitted to the City for review. The City's review comments will be incorporated and a final RFQ Package will be prepared for issuance. 3. Develop and provide a Pre-Solicitation Notice to the City for posting pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 2269.052. 4. Prepare for and facilitate a pre-RFQ issuance meeting to solicit market feedback. 5. Advertise and Issue RFQ in conjunction with the City's procurement team. 4.2 RFQ Responses and Selection The FNI team will support the RFQ process and will: 1. Schedule a pre-submittal meeting with potential responders to provide a briefing on the project, the procurement schedule, record and address questions from attendees, and conduct a site tour. 2. Solicit submittals of Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from Potential Contractors. 3. Review SOQs from Potential contractors; prepare a Fact-Finding review summary for each response compliant with RFQ requirements; provide a listing of deficiencies or omissions for each submission; prepare a memorandum of the deficiencies and omissions and request for additional information, if needed, to be sent by City to each proposer. The memorandum will identify any pass or failure of mandatory requirements and any recommendations as to declaring proposers non-responsive. 4. Conduct independent diligence (technical and financial) on proposer teams, references, their key personnel, their referenced projects, past project performance. 5. Prepare a vendor evaluation guidance document for the CITY's Procurement Workgroup's use to assist with their review of the vendor qualifications. 6. Assist the City's Procurement Workgroup in evaluating and scoring the SOQ and determining the short list. The Consultant will meet with City's Procurement Workgroup to review SOQs, address comments and answer questions. The City's Evaluation Committee will make final scoring adjustments and compile composite scores to determine the recommended short-list for City's Engineering Department's approval. The FNI Team will not score the submissions. 7. Prepare a memorandum summarizing the results of the City's Procurement Workgroup's vendor evaluations and ranking. Task 4 Deliverables Pre-Solicitation Notice Draft and Final RFQ Vendor Evaluation Guidance Document Vendor Evaluations and Ranking Memorandum Draft and Final P-DB Agreement— Preliminary Term Sheet City Council Briefing documents Task 5.0: Request for Proposals Process and Progressive Design Build Agreement Description: During this stage of the Project the P-DB Agreement, the final Design Criteria Package and the RFP will be under development simultaneously. The FNI Team will develop the Draft Final RFP and assist the City's Legal Team with the development of the Draft P-DB Agreement. The FNI Team will also assist in the review of respondent proposals, the negotiation of the final P-DB Agreement with the highest ranked Respondent vendor team and assist the City to award the P-DB Agreement. 5.1: Develop Progressive Design-Build Agreement (P-DB Agreement): The P-DB Agreement is the contractual embodiment of the agreement between City and the progressive design-builder to deliver the project. Typically, a draft P-DB Agreement is included with the RFP so that potential proposers can understand the risk allocation and select their team members accordingly. In conjunction with the City, the FNI Team will: 1. Prepare a draft P-DB Agreement that allocates risk in a manner consistent with the City's risk tolerances while accounting for the unique facets of progressive design-build and leveraging the potential benefits of this delivery method. 2. Collaborate with the City to establish the draft P-DB Agreement's processes for the project's validation period, design reviews, project administration system, including claims evaluation and change order approval, dispute resolution, warranties, payment methods, oversight, and addressing nonconformance with the Design Criteria Package, acceptance or turnover conditions. 3. Confirm that all required federal cross-cutting provisions are included in the contract documents so that federal funding is not jeopardized due to non-compliance, as applicable if federal funding is secured. 5.2: Development of a draft P-DB Agreement Exhibit Documents The FNI Team will: 1. Assist the City's legal team to develop the draft P-DB Agreement and its technical Appendices addressing the Project's Validation Period Process, Design Development, Governmental Approvals, Pre-Construction Work, Pre-purchased Equipment, Limited NTP, Construction, Mechanical Completion, Start-up, Testing, Acceptance Testing and Turnover to the City operations for inclusion in the Draft P-DB Agreement to be included with the RFP, and will circulate them for other team members and the City for review and comment. 2. Provide one revision upon receipt of all comments to each of the draft Appendices and redistribute the revised draft for final approval. 5.3: Develop Preliminary Draft RFP The FNI Team will: 1. Prepare a draft RFP for review by the City. The draft RFP will be based on the Statement of Principles and the Design Criteria Package. It is intended that the RFP will include the following sections: a) Evaluation Criteria; b) Submission Requirements; c) Draft P-DB Agreement; d) P-DB Agreement Schedules; e) Performance and/or technical specifications; f) Statement of Validation of Prior Qualifications; g) Existing Site Information; h) Governmental Approval Requirements; i) Project Security; j) Mechanical Completion and Acceptance Test procedures; k) Turnover Requirements; and, I) Available project informational reports and data. 2. Finalize the DCP suitable for use in the RFP to establish the project definition and the design requirements upon which the proponents will base their team's qualifications and experience for the design, permitting and construction of the Project pursuant to the P-DB Agreement. The final DCP may include: a) Specifications required to establish the design, construction, and operational performance standards for the Project. Such standards will include: Product Water Quality, quantity, pressure, and delivery regime standards; facility efficiency, reliability, and spare equipment requirements; specifications as required to reflect the City standards for transmission main pipelines and interconnections to the City's distribution system and to establish the interconnection location; standards for the contract meter; specifications for SCADA interfaces with the City's distribution system for monitoring/control purposes; and the City's specific design and construction standards for facility and site architectural features, facility management, operation and maintenance requirements. b) A review of regulatory agency pilot test requirements, a pilot protocol framework, and the proposed treatment approach and provide a memorandum on the need or requirement for a pilot study. c) A conceptual treatment process design; anticipated RO treatment process performance and Product Water stability and corrosivity; raw seawater supply intake permitting requirements; and preliminary site general arrangement configuration. d) The preliminary basis of design or design concepts for treatment, intake structure, concentrate disposal facility concepts based upon the existing permit, interconnecting piping and product water storage, including pipeline routings, site storm drainage control features, site access, communications requirements, and site security standards. e) A preliminary site general arrangement drawing, preliminary pipeline alignments for product water and raw seawater pipelines, defined infrastructure and building space requirements for up to 30 mgd product water capacity. f) A preliminary treatment process flow diagram with sizing criteria, membrane performance standards, membrane flux limitations, and post treatment approach. 5.4: RFP Process for P-DB Contractor Solicitation 1. Incorporate Stakeholders' review comments on the draft RFP Package. 2. Upon notice to proceed, issue draft RFP to Shortlisted Vendors. 3. Assist with scheduling, preparation, and facilitation of confidential meetings with each shortlisted vendor to discuss technical concepts, alternatives and other technical or financial matters, explain requirements and to solicit written comments on desired changes to the Draft RFP documents. 4. Prepare a summary of comments following the review of the first draft and schedule a meeting with the City's Procurement Workgroup to present recommended modifications to Draft RFP documents. 5. Make necessary changes to the RFP and prepare final RFP documents for issuance. 6. Provide assistance to issue the RFP in accordance with applicable legal requirements. 7. Coordinate site access availability for vendors, if required, for the plant site diligence and testing. 8. Schedule a Pre-Proposal meeting for potential proposers to address questions from short listed attendees, discuss key instructions, RFP requirements and procurement schedule; questions regarding the RFP will be transmitted in writing (and/or email) and responded to all short-listed vendors in writing; develop responses in coordination with the City's Procurement Workgroup. 9. Assist in preparing up to three RFP addenda, if needed, to incorporate suggested comments or exceptions resulting from discussions or comments received from RFP proposers. Task 5 Deliverables Design Criteria Package P-DB Agreement Draft RFP and Final RFP Responses to Vendor Questions Up to three RFP addenda Briefing and presentation materials on RFP release Memorandum of Procurement Recommendation Task 6.0: Review P-DB Vendor Proposals, Contract Negotiation and Recommendation Description:The FNI Team will assist the City's legal counsel, staff, and procurement workgroup in evaluating the Respondent's submittals, negotiating with the highest-ranked vendor, and providing a recommendation. 6.1: Review Vendor Submittals The FNI Team will: 1. Plan and facilitate one training session for the City's Team on how best to understand the responses, key information to look for, how to differentiate qualifications, how to distinguish between a proposal that is merely well-written versus one that contains the appropriate qualifications, and an understanding of how to score responses within the parameters of the evaluation criteria. 2. Review the submittals from short-listed Respondents for conformance to the RFP submittal requirements and for completion of all forms. 3. Draft communications to seek clarifications from the vendor teams, if necessary. 4. Assess submittals based on responsiveness, material changes in vendor qualifications, responses to draft P-DB Agreement Documents, material discrepancies between Vendor proposals and the RFP, and the technical approach fact finding report. 5. Prepare a Business Terms Evaluation Report for the Vendor submittals received for the consideration of the City including assessment criteria listed above. 6. Prepare a Financial Evaluation Report in conjunction with the City's Finance Team. 7. Prepare a Review of Proposals fact finding memorandum for the consideration of the City. The Technical Review of Proposals memorandum will summarize the key features of the proposals, identify distinguishing characteristics of the Project approach and innovation measures presented on a comparative basis. It will not contain a ranking or recommendation. 8. Prepare a presentation and conduct a briefing on the Final Ranking of Respondent submittals as established by the Evaluation Committee. 6.2: Negotiations with Top Ranked Vendor Once The City's Evaluation Committee reviews and ranks the proposals submitted in response to the RFP based on the established evaluation criteria to determine the best value proposer, and the recommendation goes through the proper approval steps, the process of finalizing the design- builder's engagement begins. The FNI Team will: 1. Assist The City in addressing comments and exceptions to the P-DB Agreement with the selected proposer. 2. Assist the City with preparation and issuance of notices to proceed so that the project elements can timely commence. 3. Participate with the City and its Project Manager in negotiations with the top ranked P-DB contractor. Activities under this task will include: a. Participation at all negotiation sessions, developing business strategy for negotiations, and making revisions to the contract documents based upon negotiations. b. During negotiations various analyses will be performed to assess risks and economic impacts of those risks. 6.3: Recommendation and Presentation of Negotiated Service Agreement The FNI Team will: 1. Provide a letter summary regarding the final negotiated P-DB Agreement with the top ranked P-DB Vendor suitable for submission for the City approval of issuance. 2. Prepare a presentation for the City's use and attend a City Council meeting to support a briefing on the final negotiated P-DB Agreement with the top ranked P-DB respondent. 3. If requested by the City, provide a Recommendation of Award letter of the firm selected by the Evaluation Committee through adherence to the evaluation criteria. Task 6 Deliverables Vendor Response Clarifications Business Terms Evaluation Report Proposal Financial Evaluation Report City Council Briefing and presentation materials on Ranking of Vendor Responses City Council Briefing and presentation materials on Status of Vendor Negotiations City Council Briefing and presentation materials on Final Negotiated P-DB Agreement/Recommendation of Award PROJECT TIMELINE (Calendar Year) • Q1 2024— Develop and Release Request for Qualifications • Q2 2024— Shortlist Qualified Progressive Design-Build Teams • Q3 2024— Develop and Release Request for Proposals • Q4 2024— Select Top-Ranked Team, Negotiate Contract, and Issue NTP for Design COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION PROCESS: To provide the City and Region with a diverse, reliable, secure, sustainable future water supply the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-06- Owner's Representative Services for the Seawater Desalination Project on September 15, 2014. Based on selection criteria published in the RFQ, Freese and Nichols, Inc., (FNI) team was selected as the most highly qualified consultant firm by the selection committee consisting of technical representatives from the City and area Stakeholders. The evaluation committee ranked Freese and Nichols as the highest ranked firm based on 1) Experience and Qualifications, 2) Project Approach/Management Plan, 3) Presentation and Interview. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement. (Not Recommended) FISCAL IMPACT: This fiscal impact for FY 2024 is an amount of$3,779,994.00 for professional services with funding available from the Raw Water and Drought Surcharge funds reserve balances. FUNDING DETAIL: This project is listed in the FY 2024 Capital Improvement Program. Fund: Raw Water CIP (Fund 4481) Dept: Water (045) Project: Seawater Desalination (Project No. E15117) Account: Design / Outside Consultants (550950) Activity: E15117-01-4481-EXP Amount: $1,889,997.00 Fund: Drought Surcharge CIP (Fund 4490) Dept: Water (045) Project: Seawater Desalination (Project No. E15117) Account: Design / Outside Consultants (550950) Activity: E15117-01-4490-EXP Amount: $1,889,997.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this agreement with Freese and Nichols, as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Freese and Nichols Proposal Ordinance authorizing an amendment to the master professional services contract with Freese and Nichols, Corpus Christi, to provide professional services for the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project in an amount not to exceed $3,779,994.00; appropriating $3,779,994.00 from the unreserved fund balance; and amending the FY 2024 Capital and Operating Budgets; and determining all costs attributable to Raw Water. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The FY 2023-2024 Operating Budget, adopted by Ordinance No. 033151 , is amended to appropriate $1 ,889,997.00 from the unreserved fund balance in the Drought Surcharge Exemption Fund (4023) and transfer into the Drought Surcharge CIP (Fund 4490) and $1 ,889,997.00 from the unreserved fund balance in the Raw Water Development Fund (4041) and transfer into the Raw Water CIP (Fund 4481)and increase expenditures by $3,779,994.00. SECTION 2. The FY 2023-2024 Capital Budget, adopted by Ordinance No. 033152, is amended to increase revenues and expenditures by $3,779,994.00. SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute an amendment to the master professional services contract with Freese and Nichols in an amount not to exceed $3,779,994.00 for the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant Project. SECTION 4. The Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant will provide a new water source for the City of Corpus Christi and all of its customers, including both treated water customers and raw water customers. Accordingly, all costs for the Inner Harbor Seawater Desalination Treatment Plant are chargeable and attributable to raw water. Introduced and voted on the day of , 2024. PASSED and APPROVED on the day of , 2024. ATTEST: Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary so �o p A v WoRPORPg4 AGENDA MEMORANDUM 1852 Action Item for the City Council Meeting January 23, 2024 DATE: January 11, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Heather Hurlbert, CPA, CGFO, Assistant City Manager HeatherH3 Ldcctexasxom 361-826-3506 Resolution determining the costs of improvements to be financed within Improvement Area #1 of the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 and approving a preliminary service and assessment plan (PSAP), including a proposed improvement area #1 assessment roll. CAPTION: Resolution determining the costs of improvements to be financed within Improvement Area #1 of the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 and approving a preliminary service and assessment plan (PSAP), including a proposed improvement area #1 assessment roll. SUMMARY: This item will approve the Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (PSAP) for the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 (PID) which includes the costs of authorized improvements to be financed within the improvement area #1 and the improvement area assessment roll. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: In September 2021 Diamond Beach Holdings submitted an application for a Public Improvement District (PID) on North Padre Island for a master planned community that would come to be known as Whitecap. In February 2022 the City received a PID petition from Diamond Beach for the proposed PID that was followed by a revised petition received on April 8, 2022. A PID allows for an additional amount to be assessed on properties within the district which can be used to pay for the cost of public infrastructure or amenities that benefit the properties within the district. These costs can be reimbursed on a pay-as-you-go basis, or the City can issue bonds secured by the revenues generated by the assessments. On May 17, 2022 City Council held a public hearing and then approved a resolution authorizing the creation of Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 . Since the creation of the PID, the PID working group has been working together to negotiate and finalize the required PID documents which include the Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) and resulting levy of assessments along with a master development agreement. The working group includes: • City Staff • Norton, Rose Fulbright US LLP-City's bond counsel • Specialized Public Finance, Inc-City's financial advisor • FMSbonds, Inc-Bond underwriter • P3 Works-City's PID consultant and administrator • Ashlar Development-Developer • Shupe Ventrua, PLLC-Developer's counsel • Diamond Beach Holdings, LLC-Property owner The Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) defines the authorized improvements within the PID that can receive funding from the assessed revenues generated within the PID and provides the total dollar amount of the reimbursement. The Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (PSAP) is approved by resolution and includes the proposed assessment roll for the PID Improvement Area #1 within the PID. The City will then call a public hearing concerning the assessments for the Whitecap PID. At the completion of the public hearing, City Council will approve an ordinance accepting the proposed assessment roll, imposing the assessment and approving the final SAP. Improvement Area #1 includes approximately 55.9 acres out of the total 242.0 acres development area and will have 199 lots developed with single-family houses. The authorized improvements include improvements to the Preserve park area, streets, drainage, water, wastewater, soft costs related to design, construction and installing these projects, bond issuance costs, and other costs including administrative costs. Total costs estimated to be incurred for the allowed infrastructure in Improvement Area #1 is $45,112,621 . Of that $23,856,000 will be reimbursed through a future issuance of PID bonds, $2,417,714 will be reimbursed in a future improvement area, and the remainder of $18,838,907 will be funded by the developer. This item will approve the Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (PSAP) for the Whitecap Public Improvement District (PID) No. 1 which includes the costs of certain authorized improvements to be financed within Improvement Area #1 and the Improvement Area #1 assessment roll and calls a public hearing for February 13, 2024 to consider an ordinance levying assessments on the property located within the improvement area #1 of the Whitecap PID. In addition to the notice of public hearing, written notices will be sent to the owners of the property within the Whitecap PID. ALTERNATIVES: The City Council could not approve the Preliminary service and assessment plan or call a public hearing for February 13, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no immediate fiscal impact from this action. Bonds may be issued at a later date to reimburse for the improvement costs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan and call a public hearing for February 13, 2024. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan Presentation RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DETERMINING THE COSTS OF CERTAIN AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FINANCED WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA# 1 OF THE WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1; APPROVING A PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, INCLUDING A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA # 1 ASSESSMENT ROLL; DIRECTING THE FILING OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA# 1 ASSESSMENT ROLL WITH THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION; NOTICING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA # 1 OF THE WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PUBLISH AND MAIL NOTICE OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING; AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO WHEREAS, the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 372, as amended (the "PID Act") authorizes the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the "City") to create a public improvement district within the corporate boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 032761 (the "Authorization Resolution"), adopted by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City on May 17, 2022, the City has created the "Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1" (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the property within the District, consisting of approximately 242.011 acres, is being developed in phases, of which approximately 55.9022 acres, as more particularly described and depicted in the Preliminary SAP (as defined herein), are included in the first improvement area ("Improvement Area #1"); and WHEREAS, the City Council and City staff have been presented with the "Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan", including the proposed assessment roll for Improvement Area #1 attached as Exhibit F thereto (the "Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll," and jointly the "Preliminary SAP"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary SAP sets forth the estimated total costs of certain Authorized Improvements to be financed by the District at this time to benefit property within Improvement Area #1 (the "Improvement Area #1 Improvements") and the Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll states the assessments proposed to be levied against each benefitted parcel of land in Improvement Area #1 of the District, as determined by the method of assessment chosen by the City and set forth in the Preliminary SAP; and 137914991.5 - 1- WHEREAS, the PID Act requires that the Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll be filed with the City Secretary of the City (the "City Secretary") and be subject to public inspection; and WHEREAS, the PID Act requires that a public hearing (the "Assessment Hearing") be called to consider proposed assessments against the benefitted property within Improvement Area #1 of the District and requires City Council to hear and pass on any objections to the proposed assessments at, or on the adjournment of, the Assessment Hearing; and WHEREAS, the PID Act requires that notice of the Assessment Hearing be mailed to property owners liable for assessment and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City before the tenth (10th) day before the date of the Assessment Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that these actions are in the best interests of the residents of the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above in this Resolution are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of the City Council and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby accept the Preliminary SAP for the District, including the Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, in a form substantially similar to the attached Exhibit A, and which is incorporated herein for all purposes. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Preliminary SAP. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby determines that the total costs of the Improvement Area #1 Improvements to be financed by the District are as set forth in Exhibit B to the Preliminary SAP. SECTION 4. The City Council's final determination and approval of the costs of the Improvement Area #1 Improvements, or any portion thereof, shall be subject to and contingent upon City Council's approval of a final, updated Service and Assessment Plan which will include a final Improvement Area#1 Assessment Roll, after the properly noticed and held Assessment Hearing. SECTION 5. The Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll states the assessments and the projected annual installments proposed to be levied against each parcel of land in Improvement Area #1 of the District that benefits from the Improvement Area #1 Improvements, as determined by the method of assessment chosen by the City in the Authorization Resolution and as more fully described in the Preliminary SAP. 137914991.5 -2- SECTION 6. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the filing of the Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll with the City Secretary and directs the City Secretary to make the same available for public inspection. SECTION 7. The City Council expressly defers the levy of assessments against property within future improvement areas for Authorized Improvements that will benefit such property until such time as the costs of such Authorized Improvements can be determined with certainty as more fully described in the Preliminary SAP. SECTION 8. The City Council hereby authorizes, and calls, a public hearing (the Assessment Hearing, as defined above) to be held on January 23, 2024, at or after 11:30 a.m. in the Corpus Christi City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78401, at which, the City Council shall, among other actions, hear and pass on any objections to the proposed assessments, and, upon the adjournment of the Assessment Hearing, the City Council will consider an ordinance levying the assessments as special assessments on property located within the District that benefits from the Improvement Area #1 Improvements and which ordinance shall specify the method of payment of the assessments. SECTION 9. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Secretary to publish notice of the Assessment Hearing to be held on January 23, 2024, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein for all purposes, in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on or before January 28, 2024, as required by Section 372.016(b) of the PID Act. SECTION 10. When the Proposed Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is filed with the City Secretary, the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Secretary, on or before January 26, 2024 to mail to owners of property liable for the proposed assessments notice of the Assessment Hearing to be held on February 13, 2024, as required by Section 372.016(c) of the PID Act. SECTION 11. City staff is authorized and directed to take such other actions as are required (including, but not limited to, notice of the public hearing as required by the Texas Open Meetings Act) to place the public hearing on the agenda for the February 13, 2024 meeting of the City Council. SECTION 12. This Resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passage in accordance with law. 137914991.5 -3 - ADOPTED, PASSED, AND APPROVED on the 23rd day of January, 2024. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED THIS 23rd day of January, 2024: Miles Risley, City Attorney (CITY SEAL) S-1 THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of a Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the 23rd day of January, 2024, authorizing a resolution of the City determining the costs of certain authorized improvements to be financed within Improvement Area #1 of the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1, which resolution is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City, this the 23rd day of January, 2024. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) S-2 PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 23rd day of January, 2024. Paulette Guaj ardo Jim Klein Roland Barrera Mike Pusley Sylvia Campos Everett Roy Gil Hernandez Dan Suckley Michael Hunter ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Paulette Guajardo City Secretary Mayor S-3 EXHIBIT A Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (see attached) EXHIBIT B CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a public hearing will be conducted by the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas (the"City") on February 13, 2024 at or after 11:30 a.m. at the Corpus Christi City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78401. The public hearing will be held to consider proposed assessments to be levied against the assessable property within Improvement Area #1 of the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 (the "District") pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended. The proposed Authorized Improvements to be undertaken at this time (the Improvement Area #1 Improvements) include: (1) design, construction and other allowed costs related to street and roadway improvements, including related earthwork, sidewalks, drainage, utility relocation, signalization, landscaping, lighting, signage, and rights-of-way; (2) design, construction and other allowed costs related to storm drainage improvements; (3) design, construction and other allowed costs related to water, wastewater and drainage (including detention) improvements and facilities; (4) design, construction and other allowed costs related to parks, open space, and recreational improvements, including trails, landscaping, and irrigation related thereto; (5) design, construction and other allowed costs related to off-street parking facilities, including related sidewalks, drainage, utility relocation, signalization, landscaping, lighting, signage and rights-of-way; (6) design, construction and other allowed costs related to projects similar to those listed in subsections (1) - (5) above authorized by the Act, including similar off-site projects that provide a benefit to the Property within the District; (7) design, construction and other allowed costs related to special supplemental services for improvement and promotion of the District, including services related to advertising, promotion, health and sanitation, water and wastewater, public safety, security, business recruitment, development, recreation, and cultural enhancement; (8) payment of expenses incurred in the establishment, administration and operation of the District; and (9) payment of expenses associated with financing such public improvement projects, which may include but are not limited to, costs associated with issuance and sale of any revenue bonds secured by or on behalf of the District, if necessary. The total costs of the Improvement Area#1 Improvements, including administrative costs and the costs of issuing bonds, is $31,943,908. The boundaries of the District include approximately 242.011 acres of land within the corporate limits of the City, and the boundaries of Improvement Area#1 of the District include approximately 55.9022 acres of land within the District, all as more particularly described by a metes and bounds description available at Corpus Christi City Hall for public inspection. All written or oral objections on the proposed assessment within Improvement Area #1 of the District will be considered at the public hearing. A copy of the proposed Improvement Area#1 Assessment Roll, which includes the assessments proposed to be levied against each parcel of land within Improvement Area #1 of the District that 137914991.5 - B-1- benefits from the Improvement Area #1 Improvements, is available for public inspection at the office of the City Secretary, 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78401. 137914991.5 - B-2- WhitecapImprovementPublic District No . 1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN VERSION 6.0 1/4/2024 P KS► NORTH • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Tableof Contents.......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................3 Section1: Definitions .....................................................................................................................4 Section11: The District................................................................................................................. 11 Section III: Authorized Improvements......................................................................................... 11 SectionIV: Service Plan............................................................................................................... 13 Section V: Assessment Plan......................................................................................................... 14 Section VI: Terms of the Assessments......................................................................................... 17 Section VII: Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................23 Section VIII: Additional Provisions...............................................................................................23 Scheduleand Exhibits .................................................................................................................26 Schedule1....................................................................................................................................27 Appendices .................................................................................................................................28 Exhibit A-1— Map of the District.................................................................................................29 Exhibit A-2 — Plats of Improvement Area #1 ...............................................................................30 Exhibit A-3 — Map of the Preserve...............................................................................................40 Exhibit A-4— Map of Remainder Area.........................................................................................41 Exhibit A-5 — Lot Type Classification Map....................................................................................42 ExhibitB— Project Costs..............................................................................................................43 ExhibitC—Service Plan ...............................................................................................................44 Exhibit D—Sources and Uses of Funds........................................................................................45 Exhibit E— Maximum Assessment and Tax Rate Equivalent........................................................46 Exhibit F-1— Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll..................................................................47 Exhibit F-2 — Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments............................................................53 Exhibit G-1— Maps of Initial Common to All Improvements .......................................................54 Exhibit G-2— Maps of Improvement Area #1 Improvements......................................................55 Exhibit H — Form of Notice of Assessment Termination..............................................................59 Exhibit I —Annual Installment Schedule for the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation ...................................................................................................................................62 Exhibit J-1— District Legal Description ........................................................................................63 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Exhibit J-2—Improvement Area #1 Legal Description..................................................................77 Exhibit J-3—The Preserve Legal Description ...............................................................................80 Appendix A— Engineer's Report..................................................................................................82 Appendix B— Buyer Disclosures..................................................................................................83 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel Buyer Disclosure....................................................................................................................................84 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 1 Buyer Disclosure ....................................................................................................................................................90 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 2 Buyer Disclosure ....................................................................................................................................................96 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 3 Buyer Disclosure ..................................................................................................................................................102 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 4 Buyer Disclosure ..................................................................................................................................................108 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 5 Buyer Disclosure ..................................................................................................................................................114 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 6 Buyer Disclosure ..................................................................................................................................................120 Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 - Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 7 Buyer Disclosure ..................................................................................................................................................126 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 2 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Capitalized terms used in this Service and Assessment Plan shall have the meanings given to them in Section I unless otherwise defined in this Service and Assessment Plan or unless the context in which a term is used clearly requires a different meaning. Unless otherwise defined, a reference to a "Section," an "Exhibit," or an "Appendix" shall be a reference to a Section of this Service and Assessment Plan or an Exhibit or Appendix attached to and made a part of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes. The City Council passed and approved Resolution No. 032761 authorizing the establishment of the District on May 17, 2022 in accordance with the PID Act, and recorded such Resolution in the real property records of Nueces County, Texas, as Instrument No. 2022024701 on May 20 2022, and such authorization was effective upon approval of the Resolution in accordance with the PID Act. The purpose of the District is to finance the Actual Costs of Authorized Improvements that confer a special benefit on approximately 242.011 acres located within the corporate limits of the City, as described by the legal description on Exhibit J-1 and depicted on Exhibit A-1. The PID Act requires a service plan must (i) cover a period of at least five years; (ii) define the annual indebtedness and projected cost of the Authorized Improvements; and (iii) include a copy of the notice form required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended. The Service Plan is contained in Section IV and the notice form is attached as Appendix B. The PID Act requires that the Service Plan include an Assessment Plan that assesses the Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements against the Assessed Property within the District based on the special benefits conferred on such property by the Authorized Improvements. The Assessment Plan is contained in Section V. The PID Act requires an Assessment Roll that states the Assessment against each Parcel determined by the method chosen by the City Council. The Assessment against each Parcel of Assessed Property must be sufficient to pay the share of the Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements apportioned to such Parcel and cannot exceed the special benefit conferred on the Parcel by such Authorized Improvements. The Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is included as Exhibit F-1. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 3 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SECTION I: DEFINITIONS "Actual Costs" mean, with respect to Authorized Improvements,the actual costs paid or incurred by or on behalf of the Developer, (either directly or through affiliates), including: (1)the costs for the design, planning, financing, administration/management, acquisition, installation, construction and/or implementation of such Authorized Improvements; (2) the fees paid for obtaining permits, licenses, or other governmental approvals for such Authorized Improvements; (3)the costs for external professional services, such as engineering, geotechnical, surveying, land planning, architectural landscapers, appraisals, legal, accounting, and similar professional services; (4)the costs for all labor, bonds, and materials, including equipment and fixtures, owing to contractors, builders, and materialmen engaged in connection with the acquisition, construction, or implementation of the Authorized Improvements; (5) all related permitting and public approval expenses, and architectural, engineering, consulting, and other governmental fees and charges; and (6) costs to implement, administer, and manage the above-described activities including, but not limited to, a construction management fee equal to four percent (4%) of construction costs if managed by or on behalf of the Developer. "Additional Interest" means the amount collected by the application of the Additional Interest Rate. "Additional Interest Rate" means the 0.50% additional interest rate that may be charged on Assessments securing PID Bonds pursuant to Section 372.018 of the PID Act. The Additional Interest Rate is not charged on Assessments securing any reimbursement obligation for which no PID Bonds are issued. "Administrator" means the City or independent firm designated by the City who shall have the responsibilities provided in this Service and Assessment Plan, any Indenture, or any other agreement or document approved by the City related to the duties and responsibilities of the administration of the District. The initial Administrator is P3Works, LLC. "Annual Collection Costs" mean the actual or budgeted costs and expenses related to the operation of the District, including, but not limited to, costs and expenses for: (1) the Administrator; (2) City staff; (3) legal counsel, engineers, accountants, financial advisors, and other consultants engaged by the City; (4) calculating, collecting, and maintaining records with respect to Assessments and Annual Installments, including the costs of foreclosure; (5) preparing and maintaining records with respect to Assessment Rolls and Annual Service Plan Updates; (6) paying and redeeming PID Bonds; (7) investing or depositing Assessments and Annual Installments; (8) complying with this Service and Assessment Plan, the PID Act, and any Indenture,with respect to the PID Bonds, including the City's continuing disclosure requirements; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 4 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN and (9) the paying agent/registrar and Trustee in connection with PID Bonds, including their respective legal counsel. Annual Collection Costs collected but not expended in any year shall be carried forward and applied to reduce Annual Collection Costs for subsequent years. "Annual Installment" means the annual installment payment of an Assessment as calculated by the Administrator and approved by the City Council, that includes: (1) principal; (2) interest; (3) Annual Collection Costs; and (4) Additional Interest related to the PID Bonds, if applicable. "Annual Service Plan Update" means an update to this Service and Assessment Plan prepared no less frequently than annually by the Administrator and approved by the City Council. "Assessed Property" means any Parcel within the District against which an Assessment is levied. "Assessment" means an assessment levied against Assessed Property and imposed pursuant to an Assessment Ordinance and the provisions herein, as shown on an Assessment Roll, subject to reallocation upon the subdivision of such Assessed Property or reduction according to the provisions herein and in the PID Act. "Assessment Ordinance" means one or more ordinances adopted by the City Council in accordance with the PID Act that levies an Assessment on the Assessed Property, as shown on any Assessment Roll. "Assessment Plan" means the methodology employed to assess the Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements against the Assessed Property based on the special benefits conferred on such property by the Authorized Improvements, more specifically set forth and described in Section V. "Assessment Roll" means any assessment roll for the Assessed Property, including the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, as updated, modified or amended from time to time in accordance with the procedures set forth herein and in the PID Act, including updates prepared in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds or in any Annual Service Plan Updates. "Authorized Improvements" means the improvements authorized by Section 372.003 of the PID Act, including the Common to All Improvements,the Improvement Area #1 Improvements, Bond Issuance Costs, and deposit to administrative fund, and described in Sections III.A, Section 111.6, Section III.C, and Section III.D as further depicted on Exhibits G-1 and G-2. "Bond Issuance Costs" means the costs associated with issuing PID Bonds, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, financial advisory fees, consultant fees, appraisal fees, printing costs, publication costs, capitalized interest, reserve fund requirements, underwriter's discount, fees charged by the Texas Attorney General, and any other cost or expense incurred by the City directly associated with the issuance of any series of PID Bonds. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 5 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "City" means the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. "City Council" means the governing body of the City. "Common to All Improvements" means those certain Authorized Improvements that confer a special benefit to all of the property within the District, excluding Non-Benefited Property. The Common to All Improvements includes the Initial Common to All Improvements as well as future improvements that are to be determined and identified in future updates to this Service and Assessment Plan. "County" means Nueces County, Texas. "Delinquent Collection Costs" mean costs directly or indirectly related to the foreclosure on Assessed Property and the costs of collection of delinquent Assessments, delinquent Annual Installments, or any other delinquent amounts due under this Service and Assessment Plan, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees actually paid, but excluding amounts representing interest and penalty interest. "Developer" means Ashlar Interests, LLC and any successors or assigns thereof, engaged by the Owner to develop the property in the District for the ultimate purpose of transferring title to end users. "Development Agreement" means the Development Agreement— Whitecap North Padre Island by and between the Developer and the City related to the development of property within the PID, as the same may be amended from time to time. "District" means the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 containing approximately 242.011 acres located within the corporate limits of the City, and more specifically described in Exhibit J-1 and depicted on Exhibit A-1. "District Formation Costs" means the costs associated with forming the District, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, and any other cost or expense incurred by the Owner, Developer, or the City that are directly associated with the establishment of the District. "Engineer's Report" means the report provided by a licensed professional engineer that describes the Authorized Improvements, including their costs, location, and benefit, and is attached hereto as Appendix A. "Estimated Buildout Value" means the estimated value of an Assessed Property with fully constructed buildings, as provided by the Developer and confirmed by the City Council, by considering such factors as density, lot size, proximity to amenities, view premiums, location, market conditions, historical sales, builder contracts, discussions with homebuilders, reports WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 6 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN from third party consultants, or any other factors that, in the judgment of the City, may impact value. The Estimated Buildout Value for each Lot Type is shown on Exhibit E. "Improvement Area #1" means approximately 55.9022 acres located within the District, more specifically described in Exhibit J-2 and depicted on Exhibit A-2. "Improvement Area #1 Annual Installment" means the Annual Installment of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment as calculated by the Administrator and approved by the City Council, that includes: (1) principal; (2) interest; (3) Annual Collection Costs related to Improvement Area #1; and (4) Additional Interest related to any series of PID Bonds secured by all or a portion of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment, if applicable. "Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property" means any Parcel within Improvement Area #1 against which an Improvement Area #1 Assessment is levied. "Improvement Area#1 Assessment" means an Assessment levied against Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property, related to the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements, and imposed pursuant to an Assessment Ordinance and the provisions herein, as shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, subject to reallocation or reduction in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section VI herein and in the PID Act. "Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll" means the Assessment Roll for the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property, as updated, modified, or amended from time to time in accordance with the procedures set forth herein and in the PID Act, including any updates prepared in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds or any Annual Service Plan Updates. The Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is included in this Service and Assessment Plan as Exhibit F-1. "Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements" means collectively, (1) the Improvement Area #1 Improvements; (2) Improvement Area #1's share of the Initial Common to All Improvements; (3) the first year's Annual Collection Costs related Improvement Area #1; and (4) Bond Issuance Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of any series of PID Bonds secured by all or a portion of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment, if applicable. "Improvement Area#1 Improvements" means the Authorized Improvements which only benefit the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property, as further described in Section III.A and depicted on Exhibit G-2. "Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel" means all of the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property against which the entire Improvement Area #1 Assessment is levied, as shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation" means the amount shown on Schedule secured by Improvement Area #1 Assessments to be paid to the Developer under the Reimbursement Agreement. The Annual Installments for the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation are shown on Exhibit I. If the City issues one or more series of PID Bonds secured by Improvement Area #1 Assessments, then the net proceeds of such PID Bonds shall be used to refinance all or a portion of the outstanding Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation. "Indenture" means an indenture of trust entered into between the City and the Trustee in connection with the issuance of each series of PID Bonds, as amended from time to time, setting forth the terms and conditions related to a series of PID Bonds. "Initial Common to All Improvements" means the Common to All Improvements installed with Improvement Area #1, as further described in Section III.B. and depicted on Exhibit G-1. "Lot" means (1)for any portion of the District for which a final subdivision plat has been recorded in the plat or official public records of the County, a tract of land described by "lot" in such subdivision plat; and (2) for any portion of the District for which a subdivision plat has not been recorded in the plat or official public records of the County, a tract of land anticipated to be described as a "lot" in a final recorded subdivision plat as shown on a concept plan or a preliminary plat. A "Lot" shall not include real property owned by a government entity, even if such property is designated as a separate described tract or lot on a recorded subdivision plat. "Lot Type" means a classification of final building Lots with similar characteristics (e.g. lot size, home product, Estimated Buildout Value, etc.), as determined by the Administrator and confirmed by the City Council. In the case of single-family residential Lots, the Lot Type shall be further defined by classifying the residential Lots by the Estimated Buildout Value of the Lot as provided by the Developer, and confirmed by the City Council, as shown on Exhibit H. "Lot Type 1" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Villa Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 1 is attached as Appendix B-2. "Lot Type 2" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Villa + Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 2 is attached as Appendix B-3. "Lot Type 3" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Standard Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 3 is attached as Appendix B-4. "Lot Type 4" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Standard + Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 4 is attached as Appendix B-5. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 8 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "Lot Type 5" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Medium Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 5 is attached as Appendix B-6. "Lot Type 6" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Medium + Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 6 is attached as Appendix B-7. "Lot Type 7" means a Lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a Large + Lot. The buyer disclosure for Lot Type 7 is attached as Appendix B-8. "Maximum Assessment" means, for each Lot, an Assessment equal to the lesser of (1) the amount calculated pursuant to Section VLA, or (2) for each Lot Type, the amount shown on Exhibit E. "Non-Benefited Property" means Parcels within the boundaries of the District that accrue no special benefit from the Authorized Improvements as determined by the City Council, and are not assessed. "Notice of Assessment Termination" means a document that shall be recorded in the official public records of the County evidencing the termination of an Assessment, a form of which is attached as Exhibit H. "Owner" or "Owners" means Diamond Beach Holdings, LLC and any successors or assigns thereof. "Parcel"or"Parcels" means a specific property within the District identified by either a tax parcel identification number assigned by the Nueces Central Appraisal District for real property tax purposes, by legal description, or by lot and block number in a final subdivision plat recorded in the official public records of the County, or by any other means determined by the City. "PID Act" means Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended. "PID Bonds" means any bonds issued by the City in one or more series and secured in whole or in part by Assessments. "Prepayment" means the payment of all or a portion of an Assessment before the due date of the final Annual Installment thereof. Amounts received at the time of a Prepayment which represent a payment of principal, interest, or penalties on a delinquent installment of an Assessment are not to be considered a Prepayment, but rather are to be treated as the payment of the regularly scheduled Annual Installment. "Prepayment Costs" means interest, including Additional Interest and Annual Collection Costs, to the date of Prepayment. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 9 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "Preserve" means approximately 4.64 acres located within the District more specifically described in Exhibit J-3 and depicted on Exhibit A-3. The Preserve is the location of all Common to All Improvements, and is considered Non-Benefited Property. "Private Improvements" means improvements required to be constructed by the Developerthat are not Authorized Improvements but are required to reach final Lot completion. "Reimbursement Agreement" means that certain "PID Reimbursement Agreement Whitecap Public Improvement District," effective entered into by and between the City and Developer in which: (1)the Developer on behalf of the Owner agrees to construct the Authorized Improvements, including the Common to All Improvements and Improvement Area #1 Improvements, and to fund certain Actual Costs of Authorized Improvements; (2) the City agrees to reimburse the Developer for Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements solely from the revenue collected by the City from Assessments, including Annual Installments thereof, and/or from the net proceeds of PID Bonds, if issued; and (3) provides for the terms of payment of principal plus interest on each Reimbursement Obligation shown on Schedule I. "Reimbursement Obligation" means a reimbursement obligation, including but not limited to the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation, related to Actual Costs of Authorized Improvements to be paid to the Developer under the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement. Each Reimbursement Obligation shall be set forth on Schedule I attached to this Service and Assessment Plan, and will be updated at the adoption of each Assessment Ordinance. Schedule will be updated as part of the update to this Service and Assessment Plan (1) each time the City levies an Assessment, (2) when PID Bonds are issued, or (3) with each Annual Service Plan Update to reflect annual principal paid with Annual Installments collected. "Remainder Area" means approximately 181.4688 acres located within the District and entirely outside of Improvement Area#1 and the Preserve, and depicted on Exhibit A-4, to be developed as one or more future improvement areas. "Service and Assessment Plan" means this Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 Service and Assessment Plan as updated, amended, or supplemented from time to time. "Service Plan" means the plan described in Section IV which covers a period of at least five years and defines the annual indebtedness and projected costs of the Authorized Improvements. "Trustee" means the trustee or successor trustee under an Indenture. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SECTION II: THE DISTRICT The District includes approximately 242.011 contiguous acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are more particularly described on Exhibit J-1 and depicted on Exhibit A-1. Development of the District is anticipated to include approximately 620 Lots developed with single-family homes, and 50.3 acres of commercial space. Improvement Area #1 includes approximately 55.9022 acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are more particularly described on Exhibit J-2 and depicted on Exhibit A-2. Improvement Area #1 is preliminarily platted and includes 199 Lots developed with single-family homes (19 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 1, 47 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 2, 9 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 3, 93 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 4, 15 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 5, 9 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 6, and 7 single-family homes that are on Lots classified as Lot Type 7.) Final platting will be completed when infrastructure is dedicated to the City. The Remainder Area includes approximately 181.4688 contiguous acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are depicted on Exhibit A-4. Development of the Remainder Area is anticipated to include approximately 421 Lots developed with single- family homes and 50.3 acres of commercial space. SECTION III: AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Based on information provided by the Developer and its engineer and reviewed by the City staff and by third-party consultants retained by the City, the City has determined that the Authorized Improvements confer a special benefit on the Assessed Property. Authorized Improvements will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's standards and specifications and will be owned and operated by the City or maintained by the owner's association. The budget for the Authorized Improvements is shown on Exhibit B.As the Remainder Area is subdivided into future improvement areas, the costs of the Authorized Improvements, including additional Common to All Improvements that specially benefit such future improvement areas, will be determined and identified in updates to this Service and Assessment Plan when Assessments relating to Authorized Improvements benefitting such future improvement areas are levied. A. Initial Common to All Improvements ■ Preserve Preserve Improvements— Improvements within or relating to the approximate 4.64 acre WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 11 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN public park and open space to be known as the "Preserve" including installation of entryway monuments, signage, lighting, hardscape, screening walls, trails, sidewalks, pathways, playgrounds, furnishings, and irrigation systems. The Preserve Improvements will benefit all property within the District and will be owned by the City and maintained by one or more owner's associations as set forth in the Development Agreement. ■ Soft Costs Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Initial Common to All Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, legal fees, and consultant fees. B. Improvement Area #1 Improvements ■ Streets Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for roadways, testing, handicapped ramps, and streetlights. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, intersections, signage, lighting and re- vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #1. ■ Drainage Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #1. ■ Water Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #1. ■ Wastewater Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #1. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 12 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ■ Soft Costs Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #1 Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, legal fees, District Formation Costs, and consultant fees. C. Bond Issuance Costs ■ Debt Service Reserve Fund Equals the amount to be deposited in a debt service reserve fund under an applicable Indenture in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds. ■ Capitalized Interest Equals the amount required to be deposited for the purpose of paying capitalized interest on a series of PID Bonds under an applicable Indenture in connection with the issuance of such PID Bonds. ■ Underwriter's Discount Equals a percentage of the par amount of a particular series of PID Bonds related to the costs of underwriting such PID Bonds. ■ Costs of Issuance Includes costs of issuing a particular series of PID Bonds, including but not limited to issuer fees, attorney's fees, financial advisory fees, consultant fees, appraisal fees, printing costs, publication costs, City's costs, fees charged by the Texas Attorney General, and any other cost or expense directly associated with the issuance of PID Bonds. D. Other Costs ■ Deposit to Administrative Fund Equals the amount necessary to fund the first year's Annual Collection Costs for a particular series of PID Bonds. SECTION IV: SERVICE PLAN The PID Act requires the Service Plan to cover a period of at least five years. The Service Plan is required to define the annual projected costs and indebtedness for the Authorized Improvements undertaken within the District during the five-year period. The Service Plan is also WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 13 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN required to include a copy of the buyer disclosure notice form required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended. The Service Plan must be reviewed and updated in each Annual Service Plan Update. Exhibit C summarizes the initial Service Plan for Improvement Area #1. Per the PID Act and Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended, this Service and Assessment Plan, and any future Annual Service Plan Updates, shall include a form of the buyer disclosure for the District. The buyer disclosures are attached hereto as Appendix B. Exhibit D summarizes the sources and uses of funds required to construct the Authorized Improvements and Private Improvements. The sources and uses of funds shown on Exhibit D shall be updated in an Annual Service Plan Update to show the amount required to fund the required reserves and to reflect any budget revisions at the time the PID Bonds are issued. SECTION V: ASSESSMENT PLAN The PID Act allows the City Council to apportion the costs of the Authorized Improvements to the Assessed Property based on the special benefit received from the Authorized Improvements.The PID Act provides that such costs may be apportioned: (1) equally per front foot or square foot; (2) according to the value of property as determined by the City Council, with or without regard to improvements constructed on the property; or (3) in any other manner approved by the City Council that results in imposing equal shares of such costs on property similarly benefited. The PID Act further provides that the City Council may establish by ordinance or order reasonable classifications and formulas for the apportionment of the cost between the City and the area to be assessed and the methods of assessing the special benefits for various classes of improvements. This section of this Service and Assessment Plan describes the special benefit received by each Parcel within the District as a result of the Authorized Improvements and provides the basis and justification for the determination that this special benefit equals or exceeds the amount of the Assessments to be levied on the Assessed Property for such Authorized Improvements. The determination by the City Council of the assessment methodologies set forth below is the result of the discretionary exercise by the City Council of its legislative authority and governmental powers and is conclusive and binding on the Owner, developers, and all future owners and developers of the Assessed Property. A. Assessment Methodology Acting in its legislative capacity and based on information provided by the Developer and its engineer and reviewed by the City staff and by third-party consultants retained by the City, the WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 14 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN City Council has determined that the costs related to the Authorized Improvements shall be allocated as follows: ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements shall be allocated to each Parcel within Improvement Area #1 based on the ratio of the Estimated Buildout Value of each Parcel designated as Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property to the Estimated Buildout Value of all Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property. Currently, the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel is the only Parcel within Improvement Area #1, and as such, the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel is allocated 100% of the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements. ■ The costs of the Initial Common to All Improvements shall be allocated to Improvement Area #1 and the Remainder Area based upon the acreage of each Parcel or Assessed Property within Improvement Area #1 and the Remainder Area, as applicable, to the total acreage of Improvement Area #1 and the Remainder Area. The Remainder Area is allocated 76.45% of the Initial Common to All Improvements costs, and Improvement Area #1 is allocated 23.55% of the Initial Common to All Improvements costs. The Remainder Area and Improvement Area #1's shares of the Initial Common to All Improvement costs are illustrated in Exhibit B. B. Assessments The Improvement Area #1 Assessment will be levied on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel in the amount shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, attached hereto as Exhibit F-1. The projected Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments are shown on Exhibit F-2. Upon division or subdivision of the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel, the Improvement Area #1 Assessment will be reallocated pursuant to Section VI. The Maximum Assessment for each Lot Type is shown on Exhibit E. In no case will the Assessment for Lots classified as Lot Type 1, Lot Type 2, Lot Type 3, Lot Type 4, Lot Type 5, Lot Type 6 or Lot Type 7, respectively, exceed the corresponding Maximum Assessment for each Lot classification. C. Findings of Special Benefit Acting in its legislative capacity and based on information provided by the Developer and its engineer and reviewed by the City staff and by third-party consultants retained by the City, the City Council has found and determined the following: ■ Improvement Area#1 ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements equal $31,943,908 as shown on Exhibit B; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 15 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ■ The Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property receives special benefit from the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements equal to or greater than the Actual Cost of the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements; ■ The Improvement Area#1 Initial Parcel will be allocated 100%of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment levied for the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements, which equals $23,856,000 as shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll attached hereto as Exhibit F-1; ■ The special benefit ($31,943,908) received by the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel from the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements is equal to or greater than the amount of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment ($23,856,000) levied on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel for the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements; and ■ At the time the City Council approved the Service and Assessment Plan,the Owner owned 100% of the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel. In a landowner consent certificate executed by the Owner and filed with the County Clerk of the County, the Owner acknowledged that the Improvement Area #1 Authorized Improvements confer a special benefit on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel and consented to the imposition of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment to pay for the Actual Costs associated therewith. The Owner ratified, confirmed, accepted, agreed to, and approved: (1)the determinations and findings by the City Council as to the special benefits described herein and the applicable Assessment Ordinance; (2) the Service and Assessment Plan and the applicable Assessment Ordinance; and (3) the levying of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel. D. Annual Collection Costs The Annual Collection Costs shall be paid for annually by the owner of each Assessed Property pro rata based on the ratio of the amount of outstanding Assessment remaining on the Assessed Property to the total outstanding Assessment. The Annual Collection Costs shall be collected as part of and in the same manner as Annual Installments in the amounts shown on the Assessment Roll, which may be revised based on Actual Costs incurred in Annual Service Plan Updates. E. Interest The interest on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment securing the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation shall be collected at the rates in the Assessment Ordinance and as depicted on Schedule I attached hereto as part of the Improvement Area #1 Annual Installment, WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 16 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN and will not include Additional Interest unless and until PID Bonds secured by the Improvement Area #1 Assessments are issued. If and when such PID Bonds are issued, the rate calculated will match the rate on the PID Bonds, plus Additional Interest, but in no instance will the Assessment on any Assessed Property be increased. SECTION VI: TERMS OF THE ASSESSMENTS Any reallocation of Assessments as described in this Section VI shall be considered an administrative action of the City and will not be subject to the notice or public hearing requirements under the PID Act. A. Reallocation of Assessments 1. Upon Division Prior to Recording of Subdivision Plat Upon the division of any Assessed Property (without the recording of a subdivision plat), the Administrator shall reallocate the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to the division among the newly divided Assessed Properties according to the following formula: A = Bx (C= D) Where the terms have the following meanings: A = the Assessment for the newly divided Assessed Property B = the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to division C = the Estimated Buildout Value of the newly divided Assessed Property D = the sum of the Estimated Buildout Value for all of the newly divided Assessed Properties The calculation of the Assessment of an Assessed Property shall be performed by the Administrator and shall be based on the Estimated Buildout Value of that Assessed Property, as provided by the Developer, relying on information from homebuilders, market studies, appraisals, official public records of the County, and any other relevant information regarding the Assessed Property. The Estimated Buildout Values for Lot Type 1, Lot Type 2, Lot Type 3, Lot Type 4, Lot Type 5, Lot Type 6, and Lot Type 7 are shown on Exhibit E and will not change in future Annual Service Plan Updates but Exhibit E may be updated in future Annual Service Plan Updates to account for additional Lot Types. The calculation as confirmed by the City Council shall be conclusive and binding. The sum of the Assessments for all newly divided Assessed Properties shall equal the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to subdivision. The calculation shall be made IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 17 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN separately for each newly divided Assessed Property. The reallocation of an Assessment for an Assessed Property that is a homestead under Texas law may not exceed the Assessment prior to the reallocation. Any reallocation pursuant to this section shall be reflected in the Annual Service Plan Update immediately following such reallocation. 2. Upon Subdivision by a Recorded Subdivision Plat Upon the subdivision of any Assessed Property based on a recorded subdivision plat, the Administrator shall reallocate the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to the subdivision among the new subdivided Lots based on Estimated Buildout Value according to the following formula: A = [B x (C_ D)]/E Where the terms have the following meanings: A = the Assessment for the newly subdivided Lot B = the Assessment for the Parcel prior to subdivision C = the sum of the Estimated Buildout Value of all newly subdivided Lots with the same Lot Type D = the sum of the Estimated Buildout Value for all of the newly subdivided Lots excluding Non-Benefited Property E= the number of newly subdivided Lots with the same Lot Type Prior to the recording of a subdivision plat, the Developer shall provide the City an Estimated Buildout Value as of the date of the recorded subdivision plat for each Lot created by the recorded subdivision plat. The calculation of the Assessment for a Lot shall be performed by the Administrator and confirmed by the City Council based on Estimated Buildout Value information provided by the Developer, homebuilders, third party consultants, and/or the Official Public Records of the County regarding the Lot. The Estimated Buildout Values for Lot Type 1, Lot Type 2, Lot Type 3, Lot Type 4, Lot Type 5, Lot Type 6 and Lot Type 7 are shown on Exhibit E and will not change in future Annual Service Plan Updates. The calculation as confirmed by the City Council shall be conclusive and binding. The sum of the Assessments for all newly subdivided Lots shall not exceed the Assessment for the portion of the Assessed Property subdivided prior to subdivision. The calculation shall be made separately for each newly subdivided Assessed Property. The reallocation of an Assessment for an Assessed Property that is a homestead under Texas law may not exceed the Assessment prior to the reallocation.Any reallocation pursuant to this section IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 18 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN shall be reflected in the Annual Service Plan Update immediately following such reallocation. 3. Upon Consolidation If two or more Lots or Parcels are consolidated into a single Lot or Parcel, the Administrator shall allocate the Assessments against the Lots or Parcels before the consolidation to the consolidated Lot or Parcel, which allocation shall be approved by the City Council in the next Annual Service Plan Update immediately following such consolidation. The Assessment for any resulting Lot may not exceed the Maximum Assessment for the applicable Lot Type and compliance may require a mandatory Prepayment of Assessments pursuant to Section VI.C. B. Mandatory Prepayment of Assessments If an Assessed Property or a portion thereof is conveyed to a party that is exempt from payment of the Assessment under applicable law, or the owner causes a Lot, Parcel or portion thereof to become Non-Benefited Property, the owner of such Lot, Parcel or portion thereof shall pay to the City, or cause to be paid to the City, the full amount of the Assessment, plus all Prepayment Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs for such Assessed Property, prior to any such conveyance or act, and no such conveyance shall be effective until the City receives such payment. Following payment of the foregoing costs in full, the City shall provide the owner with a recordable "Notice of Assessment Termination," a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit H. C. True-Up of Assessments if Maximum Assessment Exceeded at Plat Prior to the City approving a final subdivision plat, the Administrator will certify that such plat will not result in the Assessment per Lot for any Lot Type to exceed the Maximum Assessment. If the Administrator determines that the resulting Assessment per Lot for any Lot Type will exceed the Maximum Assessment for that Lot Type,then (1)the Assessment applicable to each Lot Type shall each be reduced to the Maximum Assessment, and (2) the person or entity filing the plat shall pay to the City, or cause to be paid to the City, the amount the Assessment was reduced, plus Prepayment Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs, if any, prior to the City approving the final plat. The City's approval of a plat without payment of such amounts does not eliminate the obligation of the person or entity filing the plat to pay such amounts. At no time shall the aggregate Assessments for any Lot exceed the Maximum Assessment. D. Reduction of Assessments If as a result of cost savings or the failure to construct all or a portion of an Authorized Improvement the Actual Costs of any Authorized Improvements are less than the Assessments, WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 19 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN then (i) in the event PID Bonds have not been issued for the purpose of financing Authorized Improvements affected by such reduction in Actual Costs, the City Council shall reduce each Assessment on a pro rata basis such that the sum of the resulting reduced Assessments for all Assessed Property equals the reduced Actual Costs that were expended, or (ii) in the event that PID Bonds have been issued for the purpose of financing Authorized Improvements affected by such reduction in Actual Costs, the Trustee shall apply amounts on deposit in the applicable account of the project fund created under the Indenture relating to such series of PID Bonds that are not expected to be used for the purposes of the project fund as directed by the City pursuant to the terms of such Indenture. Such excess PID Bond proceeds may be used for any purpose authorized by such Indenture. The Assessments shall never be reduced to an amount less than the amount required to pay all outstanding debt service requirements on all outstanding PID Bonds. The Administrator shall update (and submit to the City Council for review and approval as part of the next Annual Service Plan Update)the Assessment Roll and corresponding Annual Installments to reflect the reduced Assessments. E. Prepayment of Assessments The owner of any Assessed Property may, at any time, pay all or any part of an Assessment in accordance with the PID Act. Prepayment Costs, if any, may be paid from a reserve established under the applicable Indenture. If an Annual Installment has been billed, or the Annual Service Plan Update has been approved by the City Council prior to the Prepayment, the Annual Installment shall be due and payable and shall be credited against the Prepayment. If an Assessment on an Assessed Property is prepaid in full, with Prepayment Costs, (1) the Administrator shall cause the Assessment to be reduced to zero on said Assessed Property and the Assessment Roll to be revised accordingly; (2) the Administrator shall prepare the revised Assessment Roll and submit such revised Assessment Roll to the City Council for review and approval as part of the next Annual Service Plan Update; (3)the obligation to pay the Assessment and corresponding Annual Installments shall terminate with respect to said Assessed Property; and (4) the City shall provide the owner with a recordable "Notice of Assessment Termination." If an Assessment on an Assessed Property is prepaid in part with Prepayment Costs: (1) the Administrator shall cause the Assessment to be reduced on said Assessed Property and the Assessment Roll revised accordingly; (2) the Administrator shall prepare the revised Assessment Roll and submit such revised Assessment Roll to the City Council for review and approval as part of the next Annual Service Plan Update; and (3) the obligation to pay the Assessment will be reduced to the extent of the Prepayment made. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 20 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN For purposes or Prepayments, the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation is and will remain subordinated to any PID Bonds secured by the Improvement Area #1 Assessments issued to refinance all or a portion of the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation. F. Payment of Assessment in Annual Installments Assessments that are not paid in full shall be due and payable in Annual Installments. Exhibit F-2 shows the estimated Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments. Annual Installments are subject to adjustment in each Annual Service Plan Update. Prior to the recording of a final subdivision plat, if any Parcel shown on the Assessment Roll is assigned multiple tax parcel identification numbers for billing and collection purposes,the Annual Installment shall be allocated pro rata based on the acreage of the Parcel not including any Non- Benefited Property, as shown by the Nueces Central Appraisal District for each tax parcel identification number. The Administrator shall prepare and submit to the City Council for its review and approval an Annual Service Plan Update to allow for the billing and collection of Annual Installments. Each Annual Service Plan Update shall include updated Assessment Rolls and updated calculations of Annual Installments. The Annual Collection Costs for a given Assessment shall be paid by the owner of each Parcel pro rata based on the ratio of the amount of outstanding Assessment remaining on the Parcel to the total outstanding Assessment. Annual Installments shall be reduced by any credits applied under an applicable Indenture, such as capitalized interest, interest earnings on account balances, and any other funds available to the Trustee for such purposes. Annual Installments shall be collected by the City in the same manner and at the same time as ad valorem taxes. Annual Installments shall be subject to the penalties, procedures, and foreclosure sale in case of delinquencies as set forth in the PID Act and in the same manner as ad valorem taxes due and owing to the City. To the extent permitted by the PID Act or other applicable law, the City Council may provide for other means of collecting Annual Installments, but in no case shall the City take any action, or fail to take any action, that would cause it to be in default under any Indenture. Assessments shall have the lien priority specified in the PID Act. Sales of the Assessed Property for nonpayment of Annual Installments shall be subject to the lien for the remaining unpaid Annual Installments against the Assessed Property, and the Assessed Property may again be sold at a judicial foreclosure sale if the purchaser fails to timely pay any of the remaining unpaid Annual Installments as they become due and payable. The City reserves the right to refund PID Bonds in accordance with applicable law, including the PID Act. In the event of a refunding, the Administrator shall recalculate the Annual Installments WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 21 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN so that total Annual Installments will be sufficient to pay the refunding bonds, and the refunding bonds shall constitute "PID Bonds." Each Annual Installment of an Assessment, including interest on the unpaid principal of the Assessment, shall be updated annually. Each Annual Installment shall be due when billed and shall be delinquent if not paid prior to February 1 of the following year. The initial Annual Installments of the Improvement Area #1 Assessments shall be due when billed and shall be delinquent if not paid prior to February 1, 2025. Failure of an owner of an Assessed Property to receive an invoice for an Annual Installment shall not relieve said owner of the responsibility for payment of the Assessment. Assessments, or Annual Installments thereof, that are delinquent shall incur Delinquent Collection Costs. G. Prepayment as a Result of an Eminent Domain Proceeding or Taking Subject to applicable law, if any portion of any Parcel of Assessed Property is taken from an owner as a result of eminent domain proceedings or if a transfer of any portion of any Parcel of Assessed Property is made to an entity with the authority to condemn all or a portion of the Assessed Property in lieu of or as a part of an eminent domain proceeding (a "Taking"), the portion of the Assessed Property that was taken or transferred (the "Taken Property") shall be reclassified as Non-Benefited Property. For the Assessed Property that is subject to the Taking as described in the preceding paragraph, the Assessment that was levied against the Assessed Property (when it was included in the Taken Property) prior to the Taking shall remain in force against the remaining Assessed Property (the Assessed Property less the Taken Property) (the "Remaining Property"), following the reclassification of the Taken Property as Non-Benefited Property, subject to an adjustment of the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property after any required Prepayment as set forth below. The owner of the Remaining Property will remain liable to pay, pursuant to the terms of this Service and Assessment Plan, as updated, and the PID Act, the Assessment that remains due on the Remaining Property, subject to an adjustment in the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property after any required Prepayment as set forth below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Assessment that remains due on the Remaining Property exceeds the applicable Maximum Assessment, the owner of the Remaining Property will be required to make a Prepayment in an amount necessary to ensure that the Assessment against the Remaining Property does not exceed such Maximum Assessment, in which case the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property will be reduced by the amount of the partial Prepayment. If the City receives all or a portion of the eminent domain proceeds (or payment made in an agreed sale in lieu of condemnation), such amount shall be credited against the amount of Prepayment, with any remainder credited against the Assessment on the Remaining Property. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN In all instances the Assessment remaining on the Remaining Property shall not exceed the applicable Maximum Assessment. By way of illustration, if an owner owns 100 acres of Assessed Property subject to a $100 Assessment and 10 acres is taken through a Taking, the 10 acres of Taken Property shall be reclassified as Non-Benefited Property and the remaining 90 acres constituting the Remaining Property shall be subject to the $100 Assessment (provided that this $100 Assessment does not exceed the Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property). If the Administrator determines that the $100 Assessment reallocated to the Remaining Property would exceed the Maximum Assessment, as applicable, on the Remaining Property by $10, then the owner shall be required to pay $10 as a Prepayment of the Assessment against the Remaining Property and the Assessment on the Remaining Property shall be adjusted to $90. Notwithstanding the previous paragraphs in this subsection, if the owner of the Remaining Property notifies the City and the Administrator that the Taking prevents the Remaining Property from being developed for any use which could support the Estimated Buildout Value requirement, the owner shall, upon receipt of the compensation for the Taken Property, be required to prepay the amount of the Assessment required to buy down the outstanding Assessment to the applicable Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property to support the Estimated Buildout Value requirement. The owner will remain liable to pay the Assessment on both the Taken Property and the Remaining Property until such time that such Assessment has been prepaid in full. Notwithstanding the previous paragraphs in this subsection, the Assessments shall never be reduced to an amount less than the amount required to pay all outstanding debt service requirements on all outstanding PID Bonds. SECTION VII: ASSESSMENT ROLL The Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is attached as Exhibit F-1. The Administrator shall prepare and submit to the City Council for review and approval proposed revisions to the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll and Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments for each Parcel as part of each Annual Service Plan Update. SECTION VIII: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS A. Calculation Errors If the owner of a Parcel claims that an error has been made in any calculation required by this Service and Assessment Plan, including, but not limited to, any calculation made as part of any WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 23 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Annual Service Plan Update, the owner's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to submit a written notice of error to the Administrator by December 1s' of each year following City Council's approval of the calculation. Otherwise, the owner shall be deemed to have unconditionally approved and accepted the calculation. The Administrator shall provide a written response to the City Council and the owner not later than 30 days after receipt of such written notice of error by the Administrator. The City Council shall consider the owner's notice of error and the Administrator's response at a public meeting, and, not later than 30 days after closing such meeting,the City Council shall make a final determination as to whether an error has been made. If the City Council determines that an error has been made, the City Council shall take such corrective action as is authorized by the PID Act,this Service and Assessment Plan, the applicable Assessment Ordinance,the applicable Indenture,or as otherwise authorized by the discretionary power of the City Council. The determination by the City Council as to whether an error has been made, and any corrective action taken by the City Council, shall be final and binding on the owner and the Administrator. B. Amendments Amendments to this Service and Assessment Plan must be made by the City Council in accordance with the PID Act. To the extent permitted by the PID Act,this Service and Assessment Plan may be amended without notice to owners of the Assessed Property: (1) to correct mistakes and clerical errors; (2) to clarify ambiguities; and (3) to provide procedures to collect Assessments, Annual Installments, and other charges imposed by this Service and Assessment Plan. C. Administration and Interpretation The Administrator shall: (1) perform the obligations of the Administrator as set forth in this Service and Assessment Plan; (2) administer the District for and on behalf of and at the direction of the City Council; and (3) interpret the provisions of this Service and Assessment Plan. Interpretations of this Service and Assessment Plan by the Administrator shall be in writing and shall be appealable to the City Council by owners of Assessed Property adversely affected by the interpretation. Appeals shall be decided by the City Council after holding a public meeting at which all interested parties have an opportunity to be heard. Decisions by the City Council shall be final and binding on the owners of Assessed Property and developers and their successors and assigns. D. Form of Buyer Disclosure/Filing Requirements Per Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended,this Service and Assessment Plan, and any future Annual Service Plan Updates, shall include a form of the buyer disclosures for the WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 24 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN District. The buyer disclosures are attached hereto as Appendix B. Within seven days of approval by the City Council, the City shall file and record in the real property records of the County the executed ordinance of this Service and Assessment Plan, or any future Annual Service Plan Updates. The executed ordinance, including any attachments, approving this Service an Assessment Plan or any future Annual Service Plan Updates shall be filed and recorded in their entirety. E. Severability If any provision of this Service and Assessment Plan is determined by a governmental agency or court to be unenforceable, the unenforceable provision shall be deleted and, to the maximum extent possible, shall be rewritten to be enforceable. Every effort shall be made to enforce the remaining provisions. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 25 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SCHEDULE AND EXHIBITS The following Schedule and Exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes: Schedule I Reimbursement Obligations Exhibit A-1 Map of the District Exhibit A-2 Plats of Improvement Area #1 Exhibit A-3 Map of the Preserve Exhibit A-4 Map of Remainder Area Exhibit A-5 Lot Type Classification Map Exhibit B Project Costs Exhibit C Service Plan Exhibit D Sources and Uses of Funds Exhibit E Maximum Assessment and Tax Rate Equivalent Exhibit F-1 Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll Exhibit F-2 Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments Exhibit G-1 Maps of Initial Common to All Improvements Exhibit G-2 Maps of Improvement Area #1 Improvements Exhibit H Form of Notice of Assessment Termination Exhibit I Annual Installments for Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation Exhibit J-1 District Boundary Description Exhibit J-2 Improvement Area #1 Boundary Description Exhibit J-3 Remainder Area Boundary Description IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 26 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SCHEDULEI The following Schedule is attached to and made apart of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes: 1. Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation Original Principal Amount: $ • Interest Rate: Interest on any unpaid portion of the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation shall be % provided; however,the Interest Rate at all times shall remain lower than or equal to the lesser of: (1) the interest rates on the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2024 (Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 Improvement Area #1 Project), or (2) _% based on the Bond Index Rate of_% as the highest average index rate reported for the[NAME OF INDEX], a weekly bond index approved by the City Council of the City, in the month before the date the City approved the Assessment Ordinance levying the Improvement Area #1 Assessments which is the same date the obligation to pay the Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation was incurred. :pproved Date of Improvement Area#1 Assessment Ordinance Approval: Ordinance No. on [ , 20_] and recorded in the real property records of Nueces County,Texas on [ ], 20_, as Document No. [ ]. • Payment Source: Solely from: (1) revenue derived from Improvement Area #1 Assessments collected by the City and deposited in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement if no PID Bonds secured by Improvement Area#1 Assessments are levied, (2) net bond proceeds of PID Bonds secured by the Improvement Area #1 Assessments levied against the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll attached as Exhibit F-1 to this Service and Assessment Plan, or (3) a combination of(1) and (2). WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 27 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN APPENDICES The following Appendices are attached to and made a part of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes: Appendix A Engineer's Report Appendix B Buyer Disclosures WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 28 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-1 - MAP OF THE DISTRICT HI -LE X' I I y a ! } _CCC I I♦ I � ''� 5 ♦ �� 4 I 1 A r ; r .1 •tel 3. �� - .'.r co 'j I j I � ! III � f 0� +� F P 0� DIAMOND BEACH HOLDINGS 7..; WHITFCAP TILL NORTH PADRE IS LAN 'L [' PID DIRECT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PHASIN _ -- EXHIBIT C WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-2—PLATS OF IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 Plat of WHITECAP NORTH PADRE ISLAND Unit IA Page 1 of 2 t om m 1� u] _ a 1 "tea n 1 UA ENGINEERING a o nt smwee P r _ ne.n[farce�...x.r.�s.p.ri WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 30 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN / T m �` I"`% Gq RFU nr • _FOti 'em �'Y� �n�wns oc..c .. ere r r 'a[x u [� ,Y —EAFF*M,LOIS TTP.BOOM UNES f h `C\ LIGHTHOUSE OR - 3 )} � as h I l� Tt• x py"W Plat of 9 .- t Cat _s____ � L_._.�-- S5�•50 IT— Msr: = o WHITECAP LJ� �t, r NORTH PADRE ISLAND ESA ewGlneeawe OR _ UnitlA a�,c 2 0�ru' Fof 2 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 31 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Plat Of ro TM WHITECAP NORTH PADRE ISLAND Unit 1B Page loft u EI >%'1E.n,.T nF+c"1-1,'F nF 1HE—E lI s:.HHIt'x I�IAwn IE 3 n'J r rxE u E rrc ru n [n F 1141 H E-'i'.EI L :: x'E E.E T'TE'. E.. .J m r rr[r J[ Tr[r.E -F L r -TE E'. LT t- - ,. ...... - E e,r F I'H :r.eL •T:E£T E—-E,.. E E I'. _ .% -,. r FFI-L+E r E.E, it=P lExc ZE AIT 19 mim ml ow r E f 0 ®OH®® ISI ITk II ,� N cryaY o � ,wowzsaaowoo i sT.rE of TEr.+s ma mol plat Me Mnln Geeotlbetl CaV*b'•o.opprwetl br[M .......... x- 4 -hhF I'd'111 rle dwbpmenY45ervk..Er�pxr..F LL UA ENGINEERING E.rrcrco Jr..R-S,04.1r Y WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 32 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN U 14 LT.-E P Plat of WHITECAP \ NORTH PADRE ISLAND Limit 1D \ ,Page 2 of 2 -A� as q LJAENGINEERING a n °a1 1 7 1 R INSET c SOUTH _ I ww a ;k ,p r Inr uerr 3� y ' 57-21"E 17.77' SOUTH 52251a� INSET Q Al 3, �I�,v INSET B•.4 NSET A o so icu ai .5uo auu WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 33 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN NOTES 'T r F E e Plat of mi ,u.: e, 1 1 . HIIE 1H E b W H I T E C A P �..E.n. ..o NORTH PADRE ISLAND e,eq> nit I neeteee n�,en� L� aenNf..xdr.n1.e Awra.M Page f Df 2 - f .... ....,mw..n� 2' .� r m[ :u.ems.nE•.i.0 na rou.M'u e H"' EIi F +'11 F rowed pwn unser rrc/rMnd e°Mppwrp°eeI eINe bee°fflc°�lFle MrsF E T,lE i' T F E V H T 1'L.. ' - TVf xEF4 1 1IFL i x 1 F ACRE TR4Ci i?..T J..6..�E T T T'..i.-..F I �.E i'=.:. :T .l: :6.59 ACRE M4 wd1F r .E n IAI OF TEYAS I :II:�• _ � I In 1 �i a 0� Mb Iv mw,a oa tw nrm a awe:a.d wpwm�.pa«..a,e awn IN w a a e re.°>, nn a m,w.CO'.. .",a rn.ale"neq ce...,t>s�m n. rn ofl 1� IN i1."' �adoy er e<eam ae�z� me rm-, - E TIIP' UNIT IC ... _ b T clwlrm,n semmry uuea — zoamror.[-aaromrv� a '�. Ill E IIS �i°n i I STnTE oIEYAt d — { o xa ,000 x000' awowoo. Iwt e� x ° a °gym,«a nmeele"el�e spr.e9�,b mwme me orwtlna-rr:, rwr ria.°n m.earwra la.r m STAIE CF TEYAS ai:.eue" ea . ao °"a wr:a m b �merr.acan nm Abe-ea I kwe bra..:meet uneer�e neral aidr. Thle incl p"._a Ille 4—aeecnbea pmperty -,-I by tM °ry 9eck. xw." V•pemment 0.+N°pew"t Svr.icn a� rap=Cn.i=a,Te.w, ew ens neeeneue eniq.nee enee[eM.an me p n>,e p [ee. rnie[ke eq d — �� in..tn• v o9 e,e-141 p.E.,cF.kl. 4 LJA ENGINEERING c Oercbpmeel 5—..E EnQir:eer �' roo-°tic�.'w GTS WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 34 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN r F 0Is qR �2 N O t. Cq HSG H Nq0/4N (q NO �'ST M/sr x.1 x....T. �R ti LJA ENGINEERING ' 't- i` — " z3am 3proZ•xa�.- / ...I.\�___ .L ��_____� , e 55Z 93 / YT / ¢yam c , 7 9 i / plat of W H ITECAP � <<, NORTH PADRE ISLAND 7 yI/ 5 a INI D LOTS WILDING IJNE'• Yagc-,of_ Y ' WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 35 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN NOTES bT.TC'.F cN N,r x nNEra Plat Of �,.xR. W H I T E C A P owe . et n ..., w..werrte w alwwn ow e.a am b 1 ,II NORTH PADRE ISLAND p,rpewe el tlewnPle eM aatlwTen is J,nN _.— u,sr.,,u+i u r v,c,..o „E,...E•rm r a. Unit I� NE a.. Nrnps. me nnx�-xnr ur.w,�Tw to u•ir rmc-m-r .<..,n�in o'nmeM eweN He LIL � - . 1. ae.Nrer xdv,,.me Ae>aeM Page 1 Df l , couerr cr NuccEs -..,.-..•,�Il 11 1E U rep�,a o nerrtr, r v,wa,ene ovo.o•atl -r.m,�,�.F.,,��,,.,,_ E<,,,_. a...,er Hmr pw.ee m me m be,ne wwe..1•oae eroeeww ane r,�aa �, ' o.a.,�.yo�p e.rrym.M er..N.e a.J,m o�e�e.ap.a m m.�..: ..L rn h. T h u,[ .• re.eoaW pwn antler mH Mntl oM M olflce�e,nlea�lane rinr"' NHI H 1• E, E 1 •. •E 'u�.E•EE T TE< WI' t.31S , .na[i r. Tru e.rt. u..n+ rrt+n.n - IwC. nnr rw TE.[.ure+¢r, T•.._TE iatii r7lY.. a ,I, E TI•..�T i1 i WDA N v9 P,blic _II � ®eel ee_ - 71 1 1,11 1 11. c snrr or�rss ❑ L drr m x�. F r. m®®®.... ..'ri 1"{ rero xr,a..cwm,cNrR . h+ crbnrwN s«..emn ' .�, •... ., w.r„ce,nH T..p, B[: L E nr ai iErs cowrtv cv zuy § m1,me1 Plot a me r.w.a.,�ntl.a PwP*h evvre,.a tlr tn, a,.,rJ r.�..r e�_2,-,.,..r_�.,_rr..rr._J P .... P rn.. J�rN,e rna a%� _ Lr, , N.°wnamo- vE_cru cv L,AENGINEERING C M.ebpmeme 5erveee Enpimer 4 re°n F.FnKe�._zP_L it �' wwc�eu Tia F WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 36 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN T[ Oq >e bQ RI i r / h /'•� �9S�R I ,fr j: -Ig # LJA ENGINEERING ` i " '>•-1 J - $ 0 C In - wa —T T-- 7- ig .i,•��i H.e. T.r.._. _ ,..E LPlat of 9 `; i_ WHITECAP NORTH PADRE ISLAND c waTERfRON7 LOTS iHUNo LOTSUnit 1D 7 ;Q BVILDIWG.IJNES ttP.BUILDING LINES J 50 X00' w 2ouE '.loo' Pale 2 oft WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 37 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN NLTiES Srnre c Plat o x [[ RE REL E WHITECAP NORTH PADRE ISLAND Unit IE aenm,r eon.. waaeern Pag�1 of 2 m[.m +EY+ >:112 ::_R:'F a ll:e::F ic.::R _ :F 1F£ -er..E I EHE+FFFIE+.EFE.:..E.T >.-I:::I FE LT-. ..F - I I E FV enignea a Mnry, Jennar P M1e Xatt ro ,e ,Fe p .I:, J-r:nde •r.,f,F ,- none- r - n F L:-V -TES.- E-t�F EI' E L L III . 17- .. arae r J l v:Je. 4erery ,F e m T, r,w,n .Flc.-: Ll - r_— --Erl Lso -rE -: ,rlp r uI . � n H � . m.ma P Y x r F EE IEYM ❑..L i � � _ �m e P .a dam CE WpN[M Mne devcr bb p.awM eea op and m Mhux W I ue:e Pog le) a p eee Te.er, .cer a ra,p��ennrt re.e:M!ne plee:.y eemm aen m[re_[n o -. L '' Me the nY ne dev o��m�ae,30�n efs mim�®� Kn o eY } o xa',000 1000 wao woo. eenr.w�a e X ee6 a Fare®..el ro e ser.ero-.n F srnlE of rEws me i,wrlbd�� male�m.eemJw na�r m en and".qel FeM,e he en doPedL Il.,eo nenll eln>. Ihla Tol Plur�a Me Mrcln tle[enbed pm opp,s br tM N 9xI:w eVw.e Mnue ee � pewmmee,W Pe+elepewrrt Sa:,eon T�.GIIY mw Cn.ie+I,T..w, aue ene nenneNe eiliq.eee ronex,em.an eee p nue p [ee. le:e 1M a%M — lnrs 1M v m 5 a"i —en,e Servivee F.k.e P JA ENGINEERING ryERING nr,en E FmKo d..,zp Ls.dee! Y �I'�m, T WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 38 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Pn taR \�� uw:�n.u. T WHITECAP s` T NORTH PADRE ISLAND .,U1IlIa 1E t �' � \ Pogo 2 a2V' _1 L L T:. / 'ff - F ttP.BUILAINC LINES aF._.IL.I LI E. -. Cal PU aw. Al ,E ;r, �� yv, m•' v " & s•E s sa.sF sa u g LJA ENGINEERING 4, OU NE RpA� 1 y t WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 39 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-3 - MAP OF THE PRESERVE HI -LE Zr I � • II r � 5 • I I Nk fI J DIAMOND BEACH; __ HOLDINGS = ..�.. _ WHITECAP ORTH PADRE ISLAND I ( INIT[AL IMPROVEMENTS COMMON MALL UREAS :7. r f P EXHIBIT H WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 40 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-4 - MAP OF REMAINDER AREA H® �• I W h `f LJA ENGINEERING" TEXAS ENGNEERNG FIRM F-13M r, 1" III I I um. b.9 a,"As Capt W I I .w a ' fI E I I DIAMOND BEACH' 1 ry i - -��-� HOLDINGS WHITECAP NORTH PAdRE ISLAND— REMAINING 5 L A N d._. REMAINING IMPROVEMENT AREA -- r EXHIBIT 2— ]h__r WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 41 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-5-LOT TYPE CLASSIFICATION MAP q . G WHITECAP ._„_ npRrH PADRE ISInNQ 'j�"(Vpp V{,ky Site Visualization I phase 7 Lot Numbering H*) t,Y. SMAHflvgs pR-..___. \ 4 o� Lot Type 4 u �� o,•,w p�E ,.�-.. Lot Type t 13 Lot Type 5 p Lot Type 2 u v Lot Type 6 _ _ Lot Type 3 v `i, �� _ Lot Type 7 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT B - PROJECT COSTS IImprovement Area#1 Remainder AreaInitial Common to All Improvements i`i Preserve $ 2,310,000 $ 23.55% $ 544,018 76.45% $ 1,765,982 Soft Costs[d] 852,500 23.55% 200,769 76.45% 651,731 T3,162,500 $ $ 744,786 $ 2,417,714 Improvement Area#1 Improvements Street $17,087,424 $ 100.00% $ 17,087,424 0.00% $ - Drainage 1,655,010 100.00% 1,655,010 0.00% Water 1,742,790 100.00% 1,742,790 0.00% Wastewater 3,196,725 100.00% 3,196,725 0.00% Soft Costs[-] 3,436,250 100.00% 3,436,250 0.00% $27,118,199 $ $ 27,118,199 $ Improvement Area#1 Private Improvements Community Amenities and Parks $ 8,460,000 $ 8,460,000 0.00% $ - 0.00% $ Private Landscape Development Costs 2,291,000 2,291,000 0.00% 0.00% $ 10,751,000 $10,751,000 $ $ Bond Issuance Costs If7 Debt Service Reserve $ 1,774,602 $ 1,774,602 $ Capitalized Interest - - Underwriter's Discount 715,680 715,680 Costs of Issuance 1,550,640 1,550,640 $ 4,040,922 $ 4,040,922 $ Other Costs Deposit to Administrative Fund $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ - Total $45,112,621 $10,751,000 $ 31,943,908 $ 2,417,714 Footnotes: [a]Total Costs per Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Whitecap-North Padre Island,PID Direct Public Improvements dated 11/17/2023. [b]Not reimbursable through Assessments. [c]Initial Common to All Improvements are allocated to Improvement Area#1 and the Remainder Area pro rata based on acreage.Improvement Area#1 is 55.9022 acres and the Remainder Area 181.4688 acres.Therefore,Improvement Area#1 is allocated 23.55%(=55.9022/(55.9022+ 181.4688))of the Initial Common to all Improvements,and the Remainder Area is allocated the remaining 76.45%(=181.4688/(55.9022+ 181.4688))of the Initial Common to All Improvements. [d]Initial Common to All Improvement Soft Costs include contingency,and consultant fees. [e]Improvement Area#1 Soft Costs includes$150,000 in District Formation Costs. [f]Bond Issuance Costs and Other Costs associated with Improvement Area#1 are estimates only,to be determined at time of issuance of PID Bonds to reimburse all or a portion of the Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRCT NO.1 43 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C—SERVICE PLAN Improvement Area#1 Annual Installment Due 1/31/2025 1/31/2026 1/31/2027 1/31/2028 1/31/2029 Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation Principal $ 290,000.00 $ 308,000.00 $ 327,000.00 $ 348,000.00 $ 369,000.00 Interest $ 1,483,843.20 $ 1,465,805.20 $ 1,446,647.60 $ 1,426,308.20 $ 1,404,662.60 (1) $ 1,773,843.20 $ 1,773,805.20 $ 1,773,647.60 $ 1,774,308.20 $ 1,773,662.60 Additional Interest[a] (2) $ - $ - $ - $ $ Annual Collection Costs (3) $ 40,000.00 $ 40,800.00 $ 41,616.00 $ 42,448.32 $ 43,297.29 Total Annual Installment (4)=(1)+(2)+(3) $ 1,813,843.20 $ 1,814,605.20 $ 1,815,263.60 $ 1,816,756.52 $ 1,816,959.89 Footnotes: [a]Additional Interest will not be charged on the Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation.In the event PID Bonds secured by the Improvement Area#1 Assessment are issued,the Service Plan and Improvement Area#1 Assessment Roll shall be updated to reflect the Additional Interest collected for such PID Bonds. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 44 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT D-SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources of Funds Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation $ - $ 23,856,000 $ - $ 23,856,000 Developer Contributionlal - 7,343,121 - 9,760,835 Developer Contribution-Initial Common to All Improvements-IA#IIcl - 744,786 - 744,786 Developer Contribution-Initial Common to All Improvements-Remainder Areal" - - 2,417,714 2,417,714 Developer Contribution-Private Improvements lal 10,751,000 - - 10,751,000 Total Sources $ 10,751,000 $ 31,943,908 $ 2,417,714 $ 45,112,621 Uses of Funds �01 Initial Common to All Improvements $ - $ 744,786 $ 2,417,714 $ 3,162,500 Improvement Area#1 Improvements - 27,118,199 - 27,118,199 Private Improvements 10,751,000 - - 10,751,000 $ 10,751,000 $ 27,862,985 $ 2,417,714 $ 41,031,699 Bond Issuance Costs'b' Debt Service Reserve $ - $ 1,774,602 $ - $ 1,774,602 Capitalized Interest - - - - Underwriter's Discount - 715,680 - 715,680 Costs of Issuance - 1,550,640 - 1,550,640 $ - $ 4,040,922 $ - $ 4,040,922 Other Costs Ibl Deposit to Administrative Fund $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Total Uses $ 10,751,000 $ 31,943,908 $ 2,417,714 $ 45,112,621 Footnotes: [a]Not reimbursable through Assessments. [b]Bond Issuance Costs and Other Costs associated with Improvement Area#1 are estimates only,to be determined at time of issuance of PID Bonds to reimburse all or a portion ofthe Improvement Area#1 Reimbursement Obligation. [c]Initial Common to All Improvements allocable to Improvement Area#1 are financed bythe Owner Contribution-Initial Common to All Improvements-IA#1,and are not to be reimbursed from Assessments. [d]Initial Common to All Improvements allocable to the Remainder Area are eligible to be reimbursed from future Assessments. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 45 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT E-MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT AND TAX RATE EQUIVALENT Estimated Total Estimated Assessme Average Annual Installment Lot Type Units[al Buildout Value PID TRE VTL per U nit[-] Buildout Value Total Per Unit Total Per Unit Improvement Area#1 Lot Type 1 19 $ 850,000 $ 16,150,000 $ 1,491,693 $ 78,510 $ 114,312 $ 6,016 $ 0.7078 2.8086 Lot Type 2 47 1,020,000 47,940,000 4,427,972 94,212 339,325 7,220 0.7078 2.8086 Lot Type 3 9 1,150,000 10,350,000 955,976 106,220 73,259 8,140 0.7078 2.4995 Lot Type 4 93 1,380,000 128,340,000 11,854,108 127,464 908,407 9,768 0.7078 2.4995 Lot Type 5 15 1,500,000 22,500,000 2,078,210 138,547 159,258 10,617 0.7078 2.2411 Lot Type 6 9 1,800,000 16,200,000 1,496,311 166,257 114,666 12,741 0.7078 2.2411 Lot Type 7 7 2,400,000 16,800,000 1,551,730 221,676 118,913 16,988 0.7078 1.9244 Subtotal 199 $ 258,280,000 $ 23,856,000 $ 1,828,139 2.5001 Footnotes: [a]Per information provided by Developer on 9/15/2023. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 46 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT F-1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ASSESSMENT ROLL Property I. I-I Lot Type Acreage Allocation Outstanding Annual installment due Assessment 1/31/202S"] 571270 Improvement Area#1 Initial Parcel 30.6800 30.47% $ 7,269,565.94 $ 552,726.89 571269 Improvement Area#1 Initial Parcel 70.0003 69.53% $ 16,586,434.06 $ 1,261,116.31 Totall`i 100.6803 100.00% $ 23,856,000.00 $ 1,813,843.20 Footnotes: [a]The Assessment and Annual Installment have initially been allocated between all Property IDs within the Improvement Area#1 Initial Parcel pro rata based on acreage as reported by Nueces Central Appraisal District.Future allocation of the Assessment will be done in accordance with Section VI of this Service and Assessment Plan. [b]Annual Installment covers the period September 30,2024 to October 1,2025,and is due January 31,2025. [c]For a version of the Improvement Area#1 Assessment Roll broken out on a per Lot basis by legal description per plats submitted by the Owner,see below.Note,Property ID numbers will be added when assigned by Nueces County. Legal Description Property Unit Block Lot Lot Type Outstanding Total Annual Installment 60MM Assessment 11/31/2025 TBD 1A 1 3 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 4 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 5 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 6 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 7 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 8 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 9 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 10 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 11 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 12 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 13 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 14 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 15 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 16 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 17 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 18 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 19 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 20 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 21 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 22 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1A 1 23 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 1A 1 24 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 1A 1 25 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 113 6 2 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 3 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 47 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Property Outstanding Total Annual Installment Unit Block Lot Lot Type 1 Assessment 11/31/2025 TBD 113 6 4 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 5 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 6 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 7 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 8 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 9 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 10 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 11 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 12 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 13 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 14 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 15 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 16 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 17 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 18 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 19 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 20 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 22 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 23 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 24 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 25 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 26 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 27 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 28 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 29 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 30 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 31 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 6 32 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 2 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 3 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 4 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 5 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 6 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 7 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 8 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 9 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 10 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 11 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 12 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 13 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 48 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Property Outstanding Total Annual Installment Unit Block Lot Lot Type 1 Assessment 11/31/2025 TBD 113 7 14 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 7 15 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 1E 7 16 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 1E 7 17 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 8 2 Lot Type 2 $ 94,212.17 $ 7,163.23 TBD 113 8 3 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 4 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 5 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 7 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 8 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 9 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 10 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 13 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 14 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 15 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 16 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 18 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 19 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 20 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 8 21 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 9 3 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 9 4 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 9 5 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 113 9 6 Lot Type 1 $ 78,510.14 $ 5,969.36 TBD 1E 2 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 3 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 4 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 5 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 6 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 7 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 8 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 9 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 10 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 11 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 13 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 14 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 15 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 16 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 17 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 18 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 49 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Property Outstanding Total Annual Installment Unit Block Lot Lot Type 1 Assessment 11/31/2025 TBD 1E 2 19 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 2 20 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 3 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 4 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 5 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 6 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1E 3 7 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1E 3 8 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 9 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 11 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 12 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 13 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 14 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 15 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 16 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 17 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 18 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 19 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 3 20 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 10 1 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 10 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 10 3 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 1 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 3 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 4 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 5 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 6 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 7 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 8 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 9 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 10 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 11 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1E 11 12 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 1E 11 13 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 1E 11 14 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 1E 11 15 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1E 11 16 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 17 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 50 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Property Outstanding Total Annual Installment Unit Block Lot Lot Type 1 Assessment 11/31/2025 TBD 1E 11 18 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 19 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 20 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 21 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 22 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 11 23 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 12 1 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 12 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 14 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 14 3 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 14 4 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 14 5 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 14 6 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 14 7 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1E 15 1 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 2 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 4 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 5 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 6 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1D 15 7 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 1D 15 8 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 9 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 10 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 11 Lot Type 4 $ 127,463.53 $ 9,691.43 TBD 11) 15 12 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1D 15 13 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1D 15 14 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 1D 15 15 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 11) 15 16 Lot Type 6 $ 166,256.78 $ 12,641.00 TBD 11) 15 17 Lot Type 7 $ 221,675.70 $ 16,854.67 TBD 11) 15 18 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 19 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 20 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 21 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 22 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 23 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 24 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 11) 15 25 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 2 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 3 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 51 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Property Outstanding Total Annual Installment Unit Block Lot ID Assessment Due 1/31/2025 TBD 1C 16 4 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 5 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 6 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 7 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 8 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 9 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 10 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 11 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 12 Lot Type 5 $ 138,547.31 $ 10,534.17 TBD 1C 16 13 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 14 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 15 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 16 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 8,076.20 TBD 1C 16 17 Lot Type 3 $ 106,219.61 $ 81076.20 Total $ 23,856,000.00 $ 1,813,842.68 i WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 52 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT F-2 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 290,000 $ 1,483,843 $ 40,000 $ 1,813,843 2026 $ 308,000 $ 1,465,805 $ 40,800 $ 1,814,605 2027 $ 327,000 $ 1,446,648 $ 41,616 $ 1,815,264 2028 $ 348,000 $ 1,426,308 $ 42,448 $ 1,816,757 2029 $ 369,000 $ 1,404,663 $ 43,297 $ 1,816,960 2030 $ 392,000 $ 1,381,711 $ 44,163 $ 1,817,874 2031 $ 417,000 $ 1,357,328 $ 45,046 $ 1,819,375 2032 $ 443,000 $ 1,331,391 $ 45,947 $ 1,820,338 2033 $ 470,000 $ 1,303,836 $ 46,866 $ 1,820,703 2034 $ 500,000 $ 1,274,602 $ 47,804 $ 1,822,406 2035 $ 531,000 $ 1,243,502 $ 48,760 $ 1,823,262 2036 $ 564,000 $ 1,210,474 $ 49,735 $ 1,824,209 2037 $ 599,000 $ 1,175,393 $ 50,730 $ 1,825,123 2038 $ 636,000 $ 1,138,136 $ 51,744 $ 1,825,880 2039 $ 676,000 $ 1,098,576 $ 52,779 $ 1,827,356 2040 $ 718,000 $ 1,056,529 $ 53,835 $ 1,828,364 2041 $ 762,000 $ 1,011,870 $ 54,911 $ 1,828,781 2042 $ 810,000 $ 964,473 $ 56,010 $ 1,830,483 2043 $ 860,000 $ 914,091 $ 57,130 $ 1,831,221 2044 $ 914,000 $ 860,599 $ 58,272 $ 1,832,872 2045 $ 970,000 $ 803,748 $ 59,438 $ 1,833,186 2046 $ 1,031,000 $ 743,414 $ 60,627 $ 1,835,041 2047 $ 1,095,000 $ 679,286 $ 61,839 $ 1,836,125 2048 $ 1,163,000 $ 611,177 $ 63,076 $ 1,837,253 2049 $ 1,235,000 $ 538,839 $ 64,337 $ 1,838,176 2050 $ 1,312,000 $ 462,022 $ 65,624 $ 1,839,646 2051 $ 1,394,000 $ 380,415 $ 66,937 $ 1,841,352 2052 $ 1,480,000 $ 293,708 $ 68,275 $ 1,841,984 2053 $ 1,572,000 $ 201,652 $ 69,641 $ 1,843,293 2054 $ 1,670,000 $ 103,874 $ 71,034 $ 1,844,908 Total $ 23,856,000 $ 29,367,917 $ 1,622,723 $ 54,846,640 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 53 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT G-1 - MAPS OF INITIAL COMMON TO ALL IMPROVEMENTS HI 1E IA ® . a } f R x I l LJA ENGINEERING" } TEXAS ENGINEERING FIRM F-UME a, f f ti I f 4 1 • r If JJ DIAMOND BEACH; WHITECHOLDINGAP NORTH PADRE ISLAND INMAL IMPROVEMENTS - • I COMMON TO ALL UREAS . . 71 EXHIBIT H WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 54 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT G-2 - MAPS OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 IMPROVEMENTS HI -LE W `I-M P SR 0 VkE M EIV-T i _..... f .•�+ it 1 r I - � ti 1 L + if 41 fes'!v`Jrrfr } `1k 1 .➢ i. - ,' `4 x i�`• _ AuroCADSHXText r 4VW t V =Y, L � F [J, � srDIAMOND BEACH �r ti8 HOLDINGS ` ' I ' +' f W" ITECAP �.hJEERIhIG FIRM F-1366 f _ -NEENEERING �� f NORTH PADRE ISLAND - -. �. ..� IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 SITF,STREET,&STORM PID DIRECT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT D i WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 55 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN HI 1E `J I �x l _ kx f � SII _ M1t i IMPR._gV'EME` T I - ►' I w • w r }"� — `. ' F 11 L x� .r a f � f} 7 41 F DIAMOND BEACH HOLDINGS L YA ENGINEERING f W H I T E C A P tv TEXAS ENGINEERING FIRM F-138 NORTH PADRE 1 5 L A N C s sa s supft 506K sit axs J IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 WATER PID DIRECT PUBLIC IMPROYEMENI �exr.%1.9Fr.5r{C r xrrwL'kxm EXHIBIT E WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 56 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN .s.Al. ILE x t I W I..M...R'R.O V�µE ME'n,_T k QKPMF W y .e412 rr W I 116—Flu # .. -- x. 4 r)e r ' F I DIAMOND REACH f HOLDINGS a 1 W f LJA SENENGINEERING WHITECAP �� f ' ' lEU@iCaHEHiliG FIRM F-1366 i 53M8&qj-emw awry IhA{NORTH PADRE ISLAND PROVEMENT AREA#1 WASTEWATER iseapr Chhl,T—�@-011 •� PID DIRECT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS r w«.�. i • EXHIBIT F WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 57 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN L 1HS)O—VE IS AFIE'vO FCR PIFCI INM"PVAP(IM.'OL,Vs AFFREw�C.Cow.P.E-98,CH mD SWUl-a BE VSEL FOA OCNSftcW.L10OMC.OR PD�ff PVAKSES r• Ew iHM';iM 5.'P.T E+k'M"Ckk (nPe o.qT C) t�At o.m B] g = y TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET&UTILITIES [CPC a Plr [�u�T Cl Inc oMT Bl "i smwx smwx I` wvurnr s1r�r TYPICAL CR-2 LOCAL STREET&UTILITIES E�H tlAk f0°G aenr 61 I�P'm s] R] cnMoxLTE I - uiwEyE"T sTAEEr L�-�. r+aw.wr s w`TEwn1E LME ., :..::. ., ,... ....., Z a OW, LTTE �,-'[�- kT� TYPICAL BOULEVARD&UTILITIES uoPr,Pr�T E) 5 j zr Raw ri x_00 m aurt9l �P mow« 9r = Y '�— w RD> mzv r ry 2� = TYPICAL ALLEYWAY Q WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 58 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT H — FORM OF NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT TERMINATION P3Works, LLC F?KS 9284 Huntington Square, Suite 100 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 [Date] Nueces County Clerk's Office Honorable [County Clerk] 901 Leopard St 9201 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Re: City of Corpus Christi Lien Release documents for filing Dear Ms./Mr. [County Clerk] Enclosed is a lien release that the City of Corpus Christi is requesting to be filed in your office. Lien release for [insert legal description]. Recording Numbers: [Plat]. Please forward copies of the filed documents to my attention: City of Corpus Christi Attn: City Secretary 1201 Leopard St Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, [Signature] P3Works, LLC (817) 393-0353 Admin@P3-Works.com www.P3-Works.com WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 59 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: [City Secretary Name] 1201 Leopard St Corpus Christi, TX 78401 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. FULL RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LIEN STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF NUECES § THIS FULL RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LIEN (this "Full Release") is executed and delivered as of the Effective Date by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home rule municipality (the"City"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the governing body (hereinafter referred to as the "City Council") of the City is authorized by Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended(hereinafter referred to as the "Act"),to create public improvement districts within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022,the City Council of the City approved Resolution No. 032761 creating the Whitecap Public Improvement District No. 1 (the"District"); and WHEREAS, the District consists of approximately 242.011 contiguous acres within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, on , the City Council, approved Ordinance No. , (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment Ordinance") approving a service and assessment plan and assessment roll for the real property located with the District,the Assessment Ordinance being recorded on , as Instrument No. in the official public records of Nueces County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the Assessment Ordinance imposed an assessment in the amount of [amount] (hereinafter referred to as the "Lien Amount") and further imposed a lien to secure the payment of the Lien Amount(the"Lien") against the following property located within the District,to wit: WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 60 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN [legal description], an addition to the City of[City], [County], Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded as Instrument No. in the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas (the "Property"); and WHEREAS,the Lien Amount has been paid in full. RELEASE NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the full payment of the Lien Amount, the City hereby releases and discharges, and by these presents does hereby release and discharge, the Lien to the extent that is affects and encumbers the Property. EXECUTED to be EFFECTIVE this the day of , 20 . CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, A Texas home rule municipality, By: [Manager Name], City Manager ATTEST: [Secretary Name], City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of ,20 ,by the City Manager for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home rule municipality, on behalf of said municipality. Notary Public, State of Texas WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 61 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT I -ANNUAL INSTALLMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 REIMBURSEMENT OBLIGATION Installment Due Principal Interest[a] Total Installment 1/31 2025 $ 290,000 $ 1,483,843 $ 1,773,843 2026 $ 308,000 $ 1,465,805 $ 1,773,805 2027 $ 327,000 $ 1,446,648 $ 1,773,648 2028 $ 348,000 $ 1,426,308 $ 1,774,308 2029 $ 369,000 $ 1,404,663 $ 1,773,663 2030 $ 392,000 $ 1,381,711 $ 1,773,711 2031 $ 417,000 $ 1,357,328 $ 1,774,328 2032 $ 443,000 $ 1,331,391 $ 1,774,391 2033 $ 470,000 $ 1,303,836 $ 1,773,836 2034 $ 500,000 $ 1,274,602 $ 1,774,602 2035 $ 531,000 $ 1,243,502 $ 1,774,502 2036 $ 564,000 $ 1,210,474 $ 1,774,474 2037 $ 599,000 $ 1,175,393 $ 1,774,393 2038 $ 636,000 $ 1,138,136 $ 1,774,136 2039 $ 676,000 $ 1,098,576 $ 1,774,576 2040 $ 718,000 $ 1,056,529 $ 1,774,529 2041 $ 762,000 $ 1,011,870 $ 1,773,870 2042 $ 810,000 $ 964,473 $ 1,774,473 2043 $ 860,000 $ 914,091 $ 1,774,091 2044 $ 914,000 $ 860,599 $ 1,774,599 2045 $ 970,000 $ 803,748 $ 1,773,748 2046 $ 1,031,000 $ 743,414 $ 1,774,414 2047 $ 1,095,000 $ 679,286 $ 1,774,286 2048 $ 1,163,000 $ 611,177 $ 1,774,177 2049 $ 1,235,000 $ 538,839 $ 1,773,839 2050 $ 1,312,000 $ 462,022 $ 1,774,022 2051 $ 1,394,000 $ 380,415 $ 1,774,415 2052 $ 1,480,000 $ 293,708 $ 1,773,708 2053 $ 1,572,000 $ 201,652 $ 1,773,652 2054 $ 1,670,000 $ 103,874 $ 1,773,874 Total $ 23,856,000 $ 29,367,917 $ 53,223,917 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22%rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs,reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 62 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT J-1 - DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION `NV Solutions Today with a engineers i architects I contractors Vision for Tamarmw 30.68 ACRE TRACT Field Notcs Deseriptioln SI10l4 INC"I IIIA.BOUNDARY OF A 30.I;§-ACRE TRACT OF LANI)III.Ri IN DESCRIBED AS"TRACT 4", COMI'R1SFI)OF A PORTION W I O 13'C OF 1-HI;PADREISL.ANn-CORFUS CHRISTI ISLAND FArRWAY ESTATES,HEREAFTER REFERRED TO A.5 P.1.C.C.I.F.E,A NIAF OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VC]LEi1•lE PAGE ??9. MAP RECORDS, NL-ECES COUNTY, TEXAS, A F'C)RTION OF BLOCK 2n t:i I E I F BLOCKS 24.33, A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDED 1N V[)1.CN11- ]iAP P:1'(-OR1),, Ni.F:CI-:S COUNTY,TEXAS A PORTION OF T1 11-1 11.LC.f'.Lt.1•.. .51)'( 44,A hull'OF ILCD 15 RF-CORU11)TN VOLUME 42,PAGC Ili, hLNi' [tE-:('[)It171,, Nt;I- ti (CI `;FF 'IEXAS,AND 1',1I(110Nti OF E3I.00 K.ti,:?4.35,ANI)36 OF 1-11 F.I'.LC.C.1.1-I;,i i 1 0(.KS 14,",A I)1+, b1:AP OF NVNICH IS I'.I((A l,1)IN NWF'.i83,MA1'Rt'.0 ORDS,StIf.( ::X C:11 N I'Y. !'I?: ... .1%1il I,L.i.:•(:I;1,26, ..,i.5.47,44,A,D%I'URIIC)\OF131OCK14NO'AVAC1AIH)Ati1'F:RI'1 iXEVO:)R.)1.1l \VOLUN'IE67, 11,it.L:6-0z,N1 AP RI UQRiDS,N';;FCi'1,C01.'VI Y, I"F:.v..AS,SAID � l;I-."I RACI k INki S40REPULLY 11ti(H[ISI•I)B Y ME I;SAN1)110C J'N 1A AS Fia I E 0'A" EECINNINC: Al'A 5 x IX(II IRC IN R01)(Y 17.115,_595.54,X=1,19 6,4 Y 9.8 6)F0`1)ON'I'IIF SOUTH RIGIIT-OF-11•-.AY IAN 1'!'I- ESIRA.D,•A 1)R11,'F (SV' R.0J,'.I- SAME RFING ON :'ll:-5I1;"Flt I.I\E OF A CALLlif73,'P5-ACRE II<.'.CI KNCIWN;AS:1'Rl(rI]'I-1i1:-\VAYEASENE,141TFUR IIIi.:Nyi;AItI'I: STREET RE-AL IGNNT1;N1" DI.-.t RI13ED IN A I)J!FD J 1TI1. CI I V OF CORPUS CHRISTI AS RE:Ci:,RDED IN DOCUMENT NO, 2•.:I.,39226, OFFICIAL RF:CORDY, N1.:FVFS COIJN'I'Y, ['EXAS, FOR THE UPPER NORTHWEST CORN R.OF LOT 21,SAID 3LOCK 34,FOR AN EX"I7;:RIOR CORNER OF SAID LOT 27C, AND FORA COILNLR 1:LRE OF; THENCE: S 02'1621"E,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21,BLOCK 34,A DISTANCE OF 47.77 FLET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROI}FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; 'I IIENCR; S 44'49'11,' 1, .A DISTANCE OF 280,79 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND FOR A CO.,,i MON('C1R:NF..R OF I rI'11,21 ANI)22,SAID BLOCK 34,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N37'25W' 1',ALONG THE CO?k'1N10\1I IKLOf.SAID 1.0115:I;.4ND22..A1)1STANCE OF293.16 FEET TO A 7:5 INCH IRONROD FOUND ON 111; S.O(J1H RIG111-01-14'.A.Y 1.3NE:OF COMMODORE'S DRIVE(120:R.O l )I.00P.1TD CN A NON_T:'kNC&N I(I;itvl I()llif:1.1`.1-1',1§'i 111,1 RADIOS 01`X62.31 FEET,A CHORD BEARING,OF S 5"0Ih,Q"F:ANI)?.(:I IORD L.F:NG I I I OF 1E14..1.6 1+F 1.5101R A.CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAIDCURVI:I"OJ[I]-I.H 1,AN ARC 1.1`\{_5 171 OF 109.4.3HiLl IC]A5•itINCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A COM N1UN CO R N F:R OF 1011;12 AVI)2.3.1,A 11)H LOCK 34,FOR ,, :OR 1•:R IIt?R1-:OP; THENCE: S 29'44'12'W,ALONG TI1L C:ONIIN10N i Z:k_(lt 1,;ttD LOTS 22 AND 23,A DISTANCE-.OF 200.97 FEET TO A 518 LNCH IRON ROD FOUND,FORA CORN l.R I:R 1•.OF; THENCE: S 09"54'41:"W,A DISTANCE OF 275,84 FF.I'i-10 A POINT,FORA C'ORNE'R HEREOF; THENCE: S 13°36'58"E,A DISTANCE OF S-,.0b FLET TO A PORN-I',FDR A CORNER IREREOF; THENCE: S 05'18'06"E,A DISTANCE OI: F1.Ii8 I;F1,1"'1'0 A POINT I.O('AI F.1)DN A CURVE TT)TH-F. RIGHT,WITH ARADIUS OF 91.11 FEET,A Cff()It17 I3F.aR NG[)F ti;:s`':"21:"R'AN1).-A CHORD LENG:FLI OF 33.76 FEET,FOR A CORNER FIEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 33.95 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A. CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 19°49'40"NV,A DES I ANC;I•:OF 125.03 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH RADIUS OI;133.47 ITL f,ACHORD REARING OF S 1019'44"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 98,40 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TOTHE HE LEFI',AN ARC LENGTH OF 100.78 FEET,TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER IILRE'.OF; THENC'F:; 5 I O"I�':'`r"1 A 1)11,I ANCE OF 115.67 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT,'S';I H A 1t:A1)11:S OP 142.7.7171-.FT,A CHORD BEARING OF S 24°43'36"EAND A CHORD LENGTH OF 66-')1:1 F 1.F(Lt.h CORNER li??RLOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 56.80 FEET,TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 06°1608"E,A DISTANCE OF 4,08 FEF"T TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; IIS _ WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 63 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: S 38'10'10"E,A DISTANCE OF 46.88 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER ITf REOF; THENCE: S 6758'17"E,A DISTANCE OF 421 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORV FR HFRFOF; THENCE: S41°14`16"E,A DISTANCF OF 78-54 FF.FFTOAPOINTLOCAIEDONACURVE 10IHELEI-I, WITHARADIUS OF348.6IFEET-,ACHOR]]13F:ARINC;[3FS52' ti']z�"L•ANDACFIORDLENGTIIOF112.41 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALON(i SAID CURVE TO TIIE LEFT, AN ARC LENGTH OF 112.91 FF:FA 'i'O A POINT LOCATED ON A RFVF:RSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT,WITH A R.ADlUS OF 35.56 FF.F i'-A CHORD BEARING OF S 27°53'4 7"F AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 48.08 FFF.T,FOR A CORNER HF-RLOI; THENCE. CONTINUING ALONG SAID REVERSE:C11RVF.'10 ME RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 52.79 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER H FRFOKI THENCE: S 05155'22"W.A 171STANCY.OF 96-67 FLET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF f,3S-8?I I 1,.A CIIORD BEARING OF 5 031[}7'54"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 76.16 FEET,FOR A CORN F R H[REOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO TIIE LEFT,AN ARC:Ll-NGTH OF 76.21 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S OO']T08"E,A UIS'1'ANCP OF 77.05 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S DO'18'00"E,A DISTANCE OF 84.81 FEETTO APO]N I LOCA I'ED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS OF 1632,93 FEET,A CHORD SEARING OF S 07°3345"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 112,26 FEET,FORA CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, AN ARC LENGTH OF 112.28 FEET TO A POJN I LOCATED ON A RFV FRSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT WFFH A RADIUS OF 388-61 FEET.A CHORD BEAR INC; OF S 02'34'53'E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 93.96 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE! ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 94,20 FEET TO A POI N 1.FORA CDRNER HEREOF; Tl1 k:NCE: S 04°21'45"W,A DISTANCE OF 63.40 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 07'00W W,A DISTANCE OF 83.£1 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THF'•NCE: S 08°21'00"W,A DISTANCE OF 169,70 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LFF 1,WlTH A RADIUS OF 86.27 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 08'46'50"E AND A CHORD LENGTII OF 58.39 TLET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 59.57 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; TH LNCE: S 28°3342"E,A DISTANCE OF 53.03 FEET TO A POINT,FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER HEREOF; TIIENCE: N 88°39'54"W,A DISTANCE OF 56.61 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 0704'31"W,A DISTANCE OF 1221 FEET TO A POINT,FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 12'03'35"W,ADISTANCE OF 797.57 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOTS 27C AND 27D,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 75155'16"W,ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 27C AND 27D,A DISTANCE OF 532.65 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 04°16'50"E,CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 27C AND 27D,A DISTANCE OF 200.23 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 23'2635"W,CONTINUING ALONG TEE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 27C AND 27D,A DISTANC'F:OF 1-276.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID R.O.W.EASEMENT',FOR THE NORTH W I.S I'CORNER IIEREOF; THENCE:: N 68'44'S9"E.AVON(i l-H I•:NOR H4 LINE OF SAID R.O.W.EASILMF-NT,A DISTANCE OF 697.30 FEET TO A POINT LOCA CF 17 ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,WITH A RADIUS OF 410.00 FEET,A CHORD SEARING OF N 78'00'59"F.AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 132.04 FEET,FOR A CORNER HER F.OF; THENCE: ALONG;SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 132-62 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; 21 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 64 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE.: N 87°16'57"E,A DISTANCE OF 152,58 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 139.50 FEET,A CHORD BF.ARIN(,OF N 71-21-24"I;AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 76.56 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE`PO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 77.55 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 20.52 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 12'59'47"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 27.39 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONI INUING ALONG SAID COMPOLND CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.99 FEF["I 0 A 5"S INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE:OF SAID COMMODORE'S DRIVh LOCATED ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 492.33 FEET.A CHORD BEARING Ol'S 36°01'52"E AND A CH(]KD LENGTII OF 109.12 FEET,FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO TETE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 109.34 FEET I'O A 5'8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND AT THE INTERSECTION OF COMMODORE'S DRIVE AND ESTRADA DRIVE LOCATED ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 84°32'48"W ANT)A CHORD LENGTH OF 13.58 FEET,FORA CORNER IIEREOF-, THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 14.93 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND LOCATED ON A REVERSE.CURVE TO THE RIGHT,WITH A RADIUS OF 219.50 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 69°55'45"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 131.43 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 133-48 FFE T TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND.FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 872127"W,CONTINUING ALONG•I H E SOUTH LINE OF SAID R.O.W.EASEMENT,SAME BEING TEE SOUTH LINE OF SAID ESIRADA DRIVE R.O.W.,A DISTANCE OF 153.91 FEETTO THF:POINT OF BEGINNING,CONTAINING WITHIN THESE METES AND BOUNDS A 30.68-ACRE T'RAC I,SA'4T AND EXCEPT 0.38-ACRES WITHIN TILE PLATTED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,WITH A NET ACREAGE OF 30.30 ACRES,MORE OR LESS; NOTE: AN EXHIBIT REPRESENTING A GRAPHIC IMAGE OF THIS DESCRIPTION STYLED AS "SHEET 4 OF 5-30.68-ACRE TRACT"ACCOMPANIES THIS DOCC til EN F.THE BASIS OF BEARING IS TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINXI-E SYSTEM NAD 83,SOUTH ZONE. September 2.8,2018 4 .0 FSE M1 t: tis Job,No. 170146 5 h•E° TFqF�ti4 I.Rodarte Fel .c-...�. ••VI..RA s:: '❑ L...-F-a_.161`................. 8-.--... suR•f� 31r, WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 65 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Lmv engineers architects contractors elutions Tornoday with a 9 � � Vision for Tomorrow 74.39 ACRE TRACT Field Notes Description SHOWING THE BOUNDARY OF A 74,39-ACRE TRACT OF LAND HEREFV DESCRIBED AS TRACT I", COMPRISED OF APORTION OF THE PADRE ISLAND-C01U'LS CIIIUS'l I ISLAND FAIRWAY L:S'IA IT'S, HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS P.I.C.C.LF.E.,LC1'1 Sl-( .4NI r 7.^I),;�r 1:Ar(3f ti 111C1i 15 R1;CC}RULD IN VOLUME 67,PAGL 779,M P RECORDS,NUECES C:OtiNTY.TEXAS.A PORTION OF TI IE I'.LC.C.1.I.L.,, BLOCKS 2_4- 3.A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOL.1 TIF 40,PAGF I54.MAP RFCORDS,h"IIF.CFS COGNI Y, I ERAS, AND A PORTION OF THE P.LC.C..LF.L'., BLOCKS ',344. A MAP OF WHICH IS RLC01P1i_D IN VOLUME42,PAGE 10,MAP RECORDS,NUI:CIS COUNTY,CL.XAS,SAID BLOCKS 26,43, ANI'44'�()'A ':',f-4TFD SAS PF.R PLAI'RECORDLD 1N VOLCRiL h'•,P GL(is S,41A1'i[LCORBS.NLILCL'S COI;':IY.'I LX. S,S2UD 71.39-ACRE TRACT BEING MORE FULLY DESCRTRFII RY AIFTFS;AND ROUNDS AS fi]iLOWS, BE:{;INNl NG, AT A 5 F ]ETCH IRON ROD(Y= 17,1.11,051.66,X=1,3 95,11)9.05)FOUND ON THE EAST" RIC,II I-i];•-',",A1 AN (iI DA,SMARINAS DRIVE(60'R.O.W),FOR A CORN f.,R 01=SAID LOT 27D,FOR THE SOLTTHWEST COR i.R OF SAID BLOCK 33,AND FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORN ER HEREOF; THENCE: N 00'45'30"E^,ALONG THE.EAST RIGHT-CIF-WAY OF DASMARINAS DRIVE AT 322.94 FEET PASS A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 33,IN ALL A DISTANCE OF 362.60 FEET TO A 5i8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID P.I.C.C,LF,E.,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 81'1928"E,ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 32,A DISTANCE OF 101.69 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF: THENCE: S 89°05'55"E,CONTLNUING ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 32,A DISTANCE OF 7431 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER I=—Or; THENCE: S 74°13'03"E,A DISTANCE OF 74.31 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 169.95 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 00°46'04"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 328.39 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 622.59 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE.: S 75°49'07"W,ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 32,A DISTANCE OF 74.25 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 89'1l'I0"W.A DISTANCE OF 73.86 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORN-FR HEREOF; THENCE,: N 79'52'11"W.CONTTNLIING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 32,A DISTANCE OF 101.66 FEE.1 10 A S;K INCH IRON ROD POUND ONTHEE.AST R1CzHT-OR' A1(LTNF OF DAS)ItARINAS DRIVE,FOR TT IF NORTHWEST CORNER O1 5:41 U BLOCK 32,,AND FORA CORNER HUCEOF; THENCE: N 00°43'06"F,ALONG THE EAST RIGH i-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 32,A DISTANCE OF 55.99 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 31 OF SAID P.I.C.C.I.F.E.,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; TAF–NCE: N 8I'30'I4"F,ALONG THE,SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 31,A DISTANCE OF 12150 FEET TO A 5.18 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 31,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THFINCE: N 00'5605"E.ALONG TAF FAST LFN E OF SAID BLOCK 31,A DISTANCE OF 159.98 FEET TO A 5/9 INCH IRON ROD IOU N I)I.O(,A"I LD Div A Cl R4 L:'1 O THE RIGHT RTTH A RADIUS OF 1698.20 FEET,. *CHORD BEARLNG OF :3.06,15"E,ANDA CHORD 1.FNGTH OF 738.26 FLL1',L ORACORNERHEREOF; THENCE: AI.ON6 SAID CURVE TO TTIE RIGHT,AN ARC I.FNG I H 01 1.14.20 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOI1hTT LOCATFD ON A Ct NT IN f I ND CURVE.TO LHL RICII I WITII A RADIUS OF 1430.48 FEET,A CHORD BEARING Ol N 33`06 5g"E,AND A CHORD LLNG I'll OF:378.0 r I-FET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINLTNG ALUNG SAID OOMPOTTND CURVE TO"IHE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 379.17 FEET TOA 5-;R INCH IRC 7N ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNLR I1171iLEOF; THENCE; N 410'34'27"F.,CONIINE ZING A1.0N6 1111 FP SI LINE OF SAID BLOCK 11,A L7i5TANCF OF 57.24119..1"1-0 A 5 8 INCH IRON ROD 1,011ND ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-'NAY 1.1N1•.OFCROWN ROYAL DRIVE(R.O.W,VA P.i.GC.1.I'.L.,BLOCK 30,A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME ilc:,t WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 66 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 40,PAC;F lli1,MAP RECORDS,NLLCES COLNTY,TEXAS,FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID E31,OC L 3 i..4ND FOR A CORNER I-IE.REOF; THENCE: S 52°52'51" F.,ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROWN ROYAL.DRIVE,A 17TSTANCF OF 293.20 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THF•NOR'I-1 W I--'S I'CORNER OF LOT 1,13LOCK 30,OF SAID P.I-C.C-ISLAND FAIRWAY ESTATES,AND FORA CORNER IIEREOF;. THENCE: S 37'05'42'W,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 30,A DISTANCE OF 73.43 FEET TO A 518 INCII IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S E5°3424"W,CONTINUING ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 30,A DISTANCE OF 649.08 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 30°05'45" E,A DISTANCE OF 400.73 FEET TO A 518 INCH [RON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 84°4644"E,A DISTANCE OF 135.17 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 53°1948" F,A DISTANCE OF 190.19 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 03`59'08"F,Alf)NG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 30,A DISTANCE OF 220.23 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: 3!"'n4'I F.,CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 30,A DISTANCE.OF 474,93 1:111-1. 10 n i.i!NCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR.A CORNER HEREOF, '1'Ht'NCE: N 40°01'58"W,A DISTANCE OF 115.07 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE NORTIIWF'T CORNER OF LOT 23,BLOCK 30,LOCATED ON A NDN-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 104.62 FEET,A CHORD SEARING OF N 31130'06'E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 61.36 FEET,FOR A CORNER HFRFOF; '1-HENC'E;:. ALON[7 C OX1.'1'TO TI-1F I.FFT,AN ARC LENGTII OF 62.27 FEET TO A5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHWES I CORNL•R OF LOT 24,BLOCK 30,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; 11IFNCE: S 74°03'33"E,ALONG TH 1-SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 24,A DISTANCE OF 112.87 FEET TO A 5.`R INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FORA C:ORNLR HEREOF; THENCE;: N 30°50'47"i:..CONTTNUING A[.ONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 30,A DISTANCE OF 235.115 FEET TO A Sib CNCII IRON ROI]FOUND,I OR A CORNER HEREOF; 'I l i ENCF.: N 23°48'25"W,A DISTANCE OF 259.46 FEl»'T TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A 01, _'11,IIEREOF; N 39'34'30" E,.A DISTANCE OF 224.73 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROIL FOUND,FOR A CORN1'HERL01; THP,Ni.'E.: .`J 16154125"W,A DISTANCE OF 2.2.0.32 FEET TO A 5(8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND, FOR A CORNL Ii 11; N 39102115"W,A DISTANCE OF 180.41 FEET'TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A III, P.HEREOF; 7'111L:NCF: N 87°28'42"W,A DISTANCE OF 120.19 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CTIRNLR HEREOF: THENCE:.. S 5112750"W,ALONI-:THE WEST LINE OF SAID R LOCK 30,A DISTANCE.OF 135.13 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUNT).�,.DR A CORNER HEREOF; TITEN'CF: ti 3n>31'04"4u.CM,I IN[IING.4i ONG I HE wTST LIv'T OF SAID BLOCK 30,A DISTANCE OF 2%1!.15 1 LL-1 TU A 518 1NC:1I IRON ROD FO[.ND,FOR A CORNER HI:zRE01•; 111 FNCE: S 24°0241"W,A DISTANCE OF 249.57 FEET TO A 518 RICH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A C;c.`tt F:R HEREOF; TRENCF: S 36'5"46"W,A DISTANCE OF 16.0.17 1-FET TO A 5.`8 INC"IT IRON ROD FOUND ON THE NOR 1 H RIG I I I-OF-WAY LINE OF CROWN ROYAL DRIVE,FOR TI I F.SOI;-T H W ES 1'CORNER OF LOT 45, BLOCK 30,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE:: N:551'1 I"W_ALONG THF:NORNI RIGIET-CIF-W.AY LINF OI,C ROriVN ROYAL DRIVE,A DISTANCE OF 229,48 FFF 1 10 A 518 INCII IRON ROD SL I',1:0R'FFIIi SCICITIIC.AST CORNER OF LOT 8, BLOCK 29,OF SMD P.I.C.C.LP.F., I.DCA'IL-'D ON A NONr]ANGENT CURVE TO-1 HE LEFT WITH A RAIAI:S OF 1718.111-EFT.A(-HORD 13L:1R)N(3 01 N30°32'33"F,AND A CHOW-)LENGTH OF 300.88 FEET, IOk A CORNTR HEREOF: xl.. WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 67 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO TPI[.:LIJ;1,-A-N ARC LENGTH OF'01,26 FFF.T TO A 5 F INCH IRON ROD FOUND LOCATED ON A COMPOUND CURVE-10'1'HE LLF1W111-1.A R,%DIL.S OT 10156.`-10 FLET.A CHORT)RFARING OFN 144646"E,AND ACHORD LlNGTH OF 385,35 FFFI',FOR A CORN. 1.R H1:RH(1F; THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE TOTHE LLFI,AN ARC.i.i.NGTH OF 81-7 2 FFFCTOA518INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THENORTHEASTCORNER Ul LO 1'L1.41..(7Ci�29.Atii?FOR A CORNER HEREOF; TTIF.NC'T:: 1,BLOCK 29,ADISTANCE Or,119.90 FELT TO A 5;8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON TILL LAST RJGHI-OF-WAY LINE OF DASMARINAS DRIVE LOCATFD ON A CURVE TO TIIE LEFT WIT11 A RADIUS OF 940.79 FEE]',A CHORD BEARLNG OF N 10°33'02"W,AND ACHORD LENGTH OF 457.23 FEET,FOR A CORNERH RCEOF; THENCE: A[.ONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 461.85 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON R''':) 1;4;ND:.f�C 1,Ill)01 ,\CO'OPOLINM CURVE TO THE LEFT WITII A RADIUS OF 617.98 FEET,A C:IT+RD':sFARTNO[)FR44`45'?5"1L,ANDACHORDLENGTHOF417.23FEET,FORACORNERHEREOF; TI I LNCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 425.59 FI-F:'I TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD SET,FORACORNERHEREOF; THENCE: N 64129159"W,ALONG THE NOR I[] R(GHT-OF-WAY LINF OF T)ASMARINAS DRIVE, A DIST.ANCF OF 53024 FEET TO A518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND 1.QCA FED ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A R.'1DiUS OF 10.13 FEET,A CHORD BEARING()F N I c)"'2']S"W,ART1 A CIIORD LENGTH OF 1.4.26 FLET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; -CHF•:NCE: ALONG C'URvI:1 o T]IL•RIGHT.AN ARC.'LENGTH Or 15.82 FEEL TO A 518 TECH IRON ROD FOUND ON ]-:14F ['.ASI RIGIIT-OF-WAY L1NL:OF AQUARIUS SI'RF.F:'1 (Si,' RO.W),FOR A CORNER HEREOF: THENCE: N 6429'20"W,ACROSS SAID RIGHT.OF-WAY A'1 RIGIiT;ANGL.1-:S,A['60.00 FEET PASS A 5108 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THF WFS-1'RIGHT-Of-WA.LIN].OF SA 11)AQUARIUS STRFFT,1N A1.1- •-A 1)IS OF 70.00 FEE 11'O APOLNT O�THF WEST UNiL(:)E•A C'A1.1_FD.3.-lig-ACRL LICACT KNOI&'N AS-A"RI(iH I-OF-WAY EASEMENT FOR IHE AQUARIL:S S[RVl: 1101-.ALIGN IF NT"T)FS(.RIRFI)IN A 1)1:1;:1)TO THE CITY OF CORP US CHRISTI:AS R_ECORMT)TN DOCU7%IENT NO. 21}11(]3922(1,OFFICL,\L RECORDS,N[ F.(:HS COUNTY,TEXAS,SAID POIN I .ALSO 1.0C:ti I ED Wl IHIN L0 F&BLOCK 9 OF'III r. PADRE ISLAND - CORPUS CHRISTI COMNIC)DORE'S (X)Vb UNIT TWO, A MAP OF WHICH IS RJ:C,ORDFD T\VOLUNIF"311,PAGE 361 \L/0 RECORDS,VLTCFS COUNTY,TF)CAS,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF, THLNCE: N F,ACROSS SLID BLOCK 9 AND ALONG THE WEST I-INE OF SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY FASYME:N1,A DISTANCE 01=291.57 FEET TO A POINT LOC:A•17_•1.7 ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 11'[]1i A!'LADIUS OF 410.00 FFF-]',A C'71OitD BEARING OF N 47°06'27"E,ANDA CHORD I.ENGT'H OF 362.42 FFE.1,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: .ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 309.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH Ll NE OF SAID R.O.W.EASEMENT,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 68°44'59"E,ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID R.O-W.EASEMENT,ADISTANCE OF 374.14 FHFJ`1'O A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 2912635'E,ACROSS SAID R-O.W.EASEMENT AND ALONG THE UPPER WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 27C,A DISTANCE OF 1,206.29 FF.F7 1'0 A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 04116'50"W,ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 27C AND 270,A DISTANCE OF 200.23 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 75'55'16"E,CONTINUING ALONG SAID COMMON LINE,A DISTANCE OF 532.65 FEET TO A POINT.FORA(:ORNER.ELEREOF; 'I'IIENCE: S 12"03'35"E,A DIS 1 ANCE OF 797.57 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; TFU,NCE: SO,114'31"W.A DISI ANCF OF 134.93 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WFTH A RADIUS OF 120.00 FLET,A CHORD HEARING OF S 12°10101"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 79.06 FEET,FOR A CORNER UERLOF; T'HE'NCE: AT ONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 80.56 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HERE-01; 'HI E"NCE: S 67'1-6'22'W.A DISTANCE OF 55.80 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF: 'T'HENC'E: S 11°19"46"W.A DISTANCE OF 504.43 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CI.-RAF'1'O I Hf LEFT WI I H A RADIUS OF 53.05 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 07°34'15"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 43,11 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE- ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC'LENGTH OF 44,39 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORIN'ER HEREOF; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 68 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: S 31'32'32"E,A DISTANCE OF 197.16 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HFREOF; THENCE: S 49'18'42'W,A DISTANCE OF 193.33 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TIC)TETE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 41°09'30"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 85.09 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 85.38 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 3310919"W,A DISTANCE OF 188.80 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET,A CHORD HEARING OF S 401723"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 50.71 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 50.85 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 34°4814" W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 88.38 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID REVERSE,CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 89.12 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 1715532"E,A DISTANCE OF 128.44 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 15°08'15"W,A DISTANCE OF 311.97 FELT TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 55°4944"W,A DISTANCE OF 167,15 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 50°23`30"W,A DISTANCE OF 253.12 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S.03°05'34"E,A DISTANCE OF 97.65 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF, THENCE: S 70°33'08"W,A DISTANCE OF 284.94 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 15103144"W,A DISTANCE OF 70.95 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 72°4331"W,A DISTANCE OF 158.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID P.I.C.C. ISLAND FAIRWAY ESTATES, LOCATED ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 65°47'32"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 218.18 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 236.89 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 74°17'18"W,ALONG THE SOUTH LIVE OF SAID BLOCK 33,A DISTANCE OF 74.35 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; TBIKNCE: N 89°1619"W,A DISTANCE OF 159.22 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE-. S 81°21'49"W,CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 33,A DISTANCE OF 101.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.CONTAINING WITHIN THESE METES AND BOUNDS A 74.39-ACRE TRACT, SAVE AND EXCEPT 1.35-ACRES WITHIN THE PLATTED, UNOPENED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS,WITH A NET ACREAGE OF 73.04 ACRES,MORE OR LESS; NOTE: AN EXHIBIT REPRESENTING A GRAPHIC IMAGE OF THIS DESCRnMON STYLED AS "SHEET 3 OF 5-74.39 ACRE TRACT"ACCOMPANIES THIS DOCUMENT.THE BASIS OF REARING IS TEXAS STATE PLANE COORIIiNAT'L SYSTEM NAD 83,SOUTH ZONE. September 28,20180 F P Joh No. 170146 ,�©�SiFp Qf1 I.Radarte ..y esrar ra.VIERA N! 6178 URA q a 41 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 69 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Lmv Solutions Today with a engineers i architects I contractors Vision for Tomorrow 72.31 ACRE TRACT Field Nates Description SHOWING THE BOUNDARY OF A 72.31-ACRE TRACT OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED AS'TRACT 2" COMPRISED OF A PORTION OF THE PADRE ISLAND-CORPUS CHRISTI ISLAND FAIRWAY ESTATES, HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE P.I.C.C.I.F.E.,LOTS 27C AND 2.7D,A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 67,PAGE 779,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS,A PORTION OF THE P.I"C.C.I,P.E., BLOCKS 45&46,A MAP OF W I I]CH IS RECORDED IN VOLIJML 42,PAGE 153,%LU'RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS, A PORI]€7N of 'fHE P.I.C.C.I.F,F,BLOCK 3..A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUNIL40,PAGE 14�.MAP RLCORDS,NUECES COUNTY:I LXAS,AND P.I.C.C'..i.F.F.,ALL OF BLOCKS 37,38,39,AND 44 A MAP 01:WHICH 1S RECORDED IN VOI.UM L•11,PAGE 128,MAP RECORDS,NUEC17S COUNTY,TEXAS,SATO 723]-ACRE TRACT BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BY MF.TF.S AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS; IiEGINN1NG: AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD(Y-17,109,842.53,X-1,396,658.56)FOUND ON THE NORTH RIG[IT-OF-WAY LINE OF WHITECAP BOULEVARD (100' R.O.W.), FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 89°14'35'W,ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WHITECAP ROTTLIWARD.AT964.99 FEET PASS A 5.:S INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID'LO I'Z1D,TI IF. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SALD BLOCK 37.TN ALL A DISTANCE OF 1,516.00 FEE')I()A 5 8 INCH IRON ROD,FOUND FOR TH1:I. i'R SOUTHW hS'1CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 40,LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RICHT,WI-If1 A.L\>1!'i OF 9.98 FEL I,A CHORD BEARING OF N 4344'56"W;SND.A CHORD LENGT];:7F i4.]"I i;C .l oR A CORNLR ilLREOF; TIIENCF: ALONI;ti^.Ill CURVETO]iii.RIGHT.ANARC'LENGTHOF15.76FEET,TOA581NCHIRON Rol)i OUND,FOR.�1'4)r TON THF,EAST RIGZI-OF-WAY LINE OF DASMARTNAS DRIVE.(60'R.O.W,), 1"0I[.A CORNFR 1-11 P-L ! TIJI,NC]F.: t C;,:x'1_' :^.L�.�'�Ci THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DASMARINAS DRIVE, A DIS7;1NCF.01 •5 ti 1 :I, CO A 5.8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,WITH A RADIUS Of'=b=2. 41 1:.-I,A CHORD BEARING OF N 04"481031"E AND A C14ORD LENGTH OF 370.55 FEET, FORA CORNIER H E:R EOE; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 370.85 FEET,TO A 5113 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 2559.67 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 04°48'55"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 341.30 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 341.56 FEET,TO A 5,1 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 37,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 00°12'31"F„A DISTANCE OF 9.87 FEET.TO.A 5iS INCA IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF THE P.i.['.C:.].F.L.,zA IS RFC OR DL D IN V OT l._M_; 40,PAGE 154,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS,FOR THE MOST IVES I"LRLY Nf3RT1111'CST CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 81'21'13"E,ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 33,A DISTANCE OF 101.32 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 99'16'19"E,A DISTANCE OF 159.22 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 74'17'18"E,A DISTANCE OF 74.35 FEET TO APOINTLOCATED ON AC7MVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS OF 169.97 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 6514732"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 218.18 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 236.90 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 72°43"31"E,A DISTANCE OF 158.15 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 15°03'44"E,A DISTANCE OF 70.95 FEET TO A POTN,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE,: N 74°33'48"E,A DISTANCE OF 284.94 FEET TO A POIN f,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 03°05'34"W,A DISTANCE OF 97.65 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 50°23'30"E,A DISTANCE OF 253.12 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 70 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: S 55°4944"E,A DISTANCE OF 167.15 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNi R H LRL01'; THENCE: N 15°08'15"E,A DISTANCE OF 311,97 FEET TO A POINT LOCATE[)ON A CURVl, I0 I HE RIGHT,WITH A RADIUS OF 145-00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 5T 6'16"E.AND A CHORD 1,HNG FH OF 188.52 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 205.23 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 81*30'53"E,A DISTANCE OF 207.33 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 27'00'39'E,A DISTANCE OF 55.67 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: 5 64°59'16"E,A DISTANCE OF 92.26 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO TTIE RIGHT,WITH A RADIUS OF 390,00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF V 25'53'11"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 53-01 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 53.05 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A ('C 3R?,TER HEREOF; THENCE: N 29'47'00"E,A DISTANCE OF 362.I5 FEE;T TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; 'I'H ENCE: S 60°07'11"E,A DISTANCE OF 225.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THENORTHWEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 46,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 29152'06"W,ALONG THF.NORTHWE5T LINT 0I tiAJI)BT.00K 4fi,.A DIS I ANCE OF 87.94 FEET,TO A 518 INCH IRON ROU SLI,fOR TILE SOU I HIVI:S'1CORNER OF LO 11'=,SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13,SAID BLOCK 46,AND FOR A C ORNFR HLRLOF; THENCE: S 60'15'30"E,ALONG TIIE COMMON i.INF:OF LOTS 12 AND 13,:11)fSTANCT OF 7811.10 FEET, TO A 5i8 INCH IRON ROD SET ON THE NOR 1 HWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY I-TNT OF MEMO COUR 1 (R.O.W. VARIES),FOR A CORNERIIERFOF; THENCE: S 29°45'01" W, ALONG THE NOP,111WEST IU( ITT-(.)I:-WAr LINE OF NF.MO COURT, A DISTANCE OF 695.89 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,[:()k THE SOU THEAS I CORNER OF LOT 26,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE-. S 76°11'24" W, A DISTANCE OF 27.65 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 29°41'04'"W,A DISTANCE OF 100.29 FEET TO A 518 INCII IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTH FAS 1 CORNER OF LOT 28,BLOCK 46,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; 'THENCE: S 59°5916"E,CONTINUING ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NEMO COURT',A DISTANCE OF 109.90 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR AN INTERIOR CORNER OF SAID LOT 15,BLOCK 45,FOR A CORNER IIEREOF; THENCE: N '9'39'51" E. ALONG THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NEMO COURT, A DISTANCE OF 45.99 F'F.1=I"I O A';.,8 NCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE UPPER NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAIDLOT 15, FHL SOUTHWEST[ORNER OF 1.071 16,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 60°12'57"E,ALONG THE.COMMON LINE OF LOTS I5 AND 16,ADISTAN(:F()F.12020 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A COMNER I I rRFOF: THENCE: S 32°44'41"E,CONTINUING ALONG THE C OkIN1ON LINT OF LOTS 15 AND 16,A DISTANCE OF 165.63 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 00141'247W,A DISTANCE OF 70.34 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A NAVIGATION CHANNEL(R.O.W.VARIES),FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE.: N 89117'24" W, ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID NAVIGATION CHANNEL,A DISTANCE OF 437.46 FFFT TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 02°0148"W,A DISTANCE OF 44.63 FEET TO A DRILL HOLE IN CONCRETE FOUND,FOR A CORNER OF SAID LOT 4,BLOCK 3,LOCATED ON A NON-TANGENT CURll L'1 O TIIE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 179.52 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF 5 59°3620"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 159.13 FEET, FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; OF SAID NAVIGATION CHANNEL, AN ARC LENGTH OF 164.86 FEET TO A POINT. BEING THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4,BLOCK 3,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 71 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE, N 66°26'56"W, LOM1C; 1 HL MOST SOUT14ERLY SOUTH LINE OF SAID IDT 4,RLOCK 3,A DISTANCE OF 333.35 FEE 1,TO A 5 8 TN CII IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4,BLOCK 3,ON THE FAST 1 JNF_OF `i.AID LOT 27D,LOCATED ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS Of 601.6+1 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 15°04'01"W AND A CHORD LENG•I'H OF 291,34 FEET,FOR A CORNFR HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 294.26 FEET,TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 00°45'I4"W,A DISTAVCF OF 590.13 FEET,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,CONTAINING WITHIN THESE METES AND BOUNDS A 72.31 ACRE TRACT,SAVE AND EXCEPT 2.87-ACRES WITHIN THE PLATTED,UNOPENED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS,WITH ANET ACREAGE OF 69.44 ACRES,MORE. OR LESS; NOTE: AN EXHIBIT REPRESENTING A GRAPHIC IMAGE OF'PHIS DESCRIPTION STYLED AS "SHEET 2 OF 5--72.31 ACM,''I RACT"ACCOMPANIES THIS DOCUMENT.THE BASIS OF BEARING IS TEXAS STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83,SOUTH ZONE. September 28,201 S p •f,�s, R.F� Job No. 170146 I.R©darts '. =.ia 6178 via �C..:^roe �BUl�yftNl WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 72 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LNV Solutions Today with a engineers I architects I contractors Vision for Tomorrow 28.63 ACRE TRACT Field Notes Description SHOWING THE BOUNDARY OF A 28.63-ACRE TRACT OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED AS"TRACT 1" OUT OF A PORTION OF LOT 27C OF THE PADRE ISLAND - CORPUS CHRISTI ISLAND FAIRWAY ESTATES, HEREAFTER REFFRRFD TO AS THE P.I.C.C.I.F.E„A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDFD IN VOLUME 67,PAGE 779,MAP RECORDS,NUE-CES COUNTY,TEXAS,SAID 28.63-ACRE TRACT BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BY'..METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING. AT A 5./8 INCH IRON ROD(Y=17,115,342.99,X=1,397,090.68)FOUND ON AN INTERIOR LINE OF SAID LOT 27C,FOR A-N 1NTFRTOR CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 00°49'34"E,A T]TS-FANCF OF 141.97 FLEI l TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ONTHE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 01-CONEMODOKE'S DRIVE(120'R.O.W.),SAID IRON ROLL LOCATED ON ANON- TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT.NVUH.A RADIUS OF 493.90 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 86°16100"E AND A CHORD 1.FNGTH OF 56.52 DEET,FOR AN EXTERIOR CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LYNGTH OF 56.55 FEET TO A 5,'8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER ITER POP, THENCE: 5 89°15'39" E, CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COMMODORE'S DRIVE,A DISTANCE OF 310.86 FEET TO A 51$INCH IRON ROI]SET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 89°15'33"E,A DISTANCE OF 196.76 FEET TO A POINT,SAID POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,WITH A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 44'16'50"E AND A CIIORD LENGTH OF 14,14 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE TO 1'IIE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 15.71 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD SET ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COMPASS STREET(W'R.O.W),FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 00°4249"W,ALONG'i'H E WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COMPASS STREET,A DTSTANCF OF 99.93 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD SET,SAID IRON ROD L.00ATFD ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT,WITH A RADIUS OF 553.81 FEET,A CHORD BF.ARI'G OF S 04°55'45"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 104.90 FEET, FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE:: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 105.05 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD SET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 10'W06" E,A DISTANCE OF 110.22 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD SET, FOR THE NOR'LHEAST COFJT ER OF LOT 11,BLOCK 4l OF THE P.I.C.C.1.F.E..A MAP OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 42,PAGE 17,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 79`38'09°W,ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF LOTS 11 AND 12,A DISTANCE OF 155.16 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 80°04'16"W,A DISTANCE OF 54.93 FEET TO A POINT,FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DOT 11.FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE. S 09°55'44"E,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT i 1,A DISTANCE OF 119.53 FEE;r,TO A POINT FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 11,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 79'3T29"E,ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF LOTS 10 AND 11,A DISTANCE OF 210.45 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COMPASS STREET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 09"59'42"E,ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COMPASS STREET',A DISTANCE OF 133.72 FEET TO A 5.8 INCH IRON ROD SFT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT„WITH A RADIUS OF 463.32 FEET.A CHORD SEARING OF S 04°41'22"E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 93.23 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF: THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LEND 114 OF 93.38 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 00'54'41"W,CONTINUING ALONG THE WES,JUGHT-OF-WAY OF COMPASS STREET,A DISTANCE OF 135.04 FEET TO A 5 8 INCII IRON ROD FOUND,I(-M 1'1IF.SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT $,BLOCK 41,FOR A CORNER HLI?r f]r 1.10 € . WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 73 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: N 89'09'11"W,ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF LOTS 7 AND S,A DISTANCE OF 136.86 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR THE SOU-I'HW1-:S 1CORNER OF SAIL)LO1 8,i3OR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 10'25'28"W,ACROSS LOTS 8 AND 9,A PIIS"1 AVCT.OF I6f OI FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE.: S 79°53`54"W,CONTINUING ACROSS LOT 9,A DISTANCE OF 133.13 FEET,TO A POINT LOCATED ON A Cl IR%FF TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 78.00 FEET,A CHORD REARING OF N 87°22'58"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 34.36 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.64 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 74139137'W,A DISTANCE OF 17.85 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 15°20'23"W,A DISTANCE OF 56.53 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER H LRT UF; THENCE: S 09109'05"H,A DISTANCE OF 319.29 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER H FRI.OF; THENCE: S 32'38'10"W,A DISTANCE OF 161.42 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON=1'ANGE-NT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADICES OF 199.85 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 23111'33"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 177.73 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THF. RI(iHT, AN ARC LENGTH OF 184.18 FEET TO A POINT LOCATFI)ON A REVF,RSF CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 354.88 FEET,A CHORD BF:.ARING OF S 06'16'17"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 141.95 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID RFVLRSE CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 142.91 FEET TO A POINT LOCATFF)ON A RL VERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 75.93 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 01-2410'W,AND.A CHORD LENGTH OF 39.88 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE; CONTINUING ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.35 FF.H I'1.O A POINT LOCATED ON A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 252.95 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 12°38'17"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 35.18 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINUNG AION(:SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT',AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.21 FELT TOAPf)W1.1ORA CORNiR-I R--.0F; THENCE: SO] 1054"E,A Dl',TA CE OF 91.61 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RPG ET WITH A RADIUS OF If,.I I FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 2011609"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH 01 4771 FEET,FOR.A COR NF:�k EREOF; THENCE: ALO\�U N.�JD Cl,R'.F TO T11E RIC411, AN A]RC LL'61-1 OF 48.00 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A I I V I.RSE CUR t F.TO TH L LL:_'I 1',_I1_:]IZL'_!l: r rl 5.1.40 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OFS 17°10'3['6, AND},(HOFS:LLNGTII r):::,,) a -:; .1,I c1!L;1[.'[;1th-R HEREOF; THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID 1,1 V1,RSI C P;-R.VL D-)TIIf I I-PT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.36 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 05117'34"W,A DISTANCE OF 75.84 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 09°00'03"W,A DISTANCE OF 160.18 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 224.76 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF S 02.55'53"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 64.38 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVF'1'0 I IIE 1,F.FT.AN ARCIJNG'I H OF 64.60 FEE'TTO A 1101N F LOCATED ON A RFVF.RSF CURVE IO THE RICillI WI III A RADIUS OF 16049 FEL I,A CHORD BLAIUNU OF S 03`59'21"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 93.18 F E:I-J,FOR A CORNER HER-EOP: THENCE: CONTINUING ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 94.54 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 26°5249"W,A DISTANCE OF 43.58 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 36.52 I=LLT,A CHORD BEARING OF S 17°51'57"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 37.27 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO TEE LEFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.11 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 41°09'40"E,A DISTANCE OF 96.97 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORN F R H 1-RE;OF; THENCE., S 01120106"W,A DISTANCE OF 50.38 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNS K f I LREOF; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 74 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: N 88'46'57'W,A DISTANCE OF 291.63 FEETTO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 51"36'31"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 84.60 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 90.84 FF.FI-TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HhRLOF! THE NC'L;: N 88'39'54"W,A DISTANCE OF 31.58 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNTR IIEREOF; THIN;[:F.: N 28"3342"W,A DISTANCE OP 53-03 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE R 1GI Il WITH A RADIUS OF 86.27 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 0814650"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH 01.58.39 FEET,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO TIIE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 59.57 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HF- -Of: THENCE: N 08=21'00"E,A DISTANCE.OF 169,70 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE; N 07`06'04"E,A DISTAK T-1 OF 83.11 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; IIIENCE: N04°21'45"E,ADiSTAN(:1-.OF63.40FEE'I'•IOAPOP.N'TLOC.4TEDON AC'LJRVE.IOTHELEFT W11H A RADIUS OF 3K861 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 02°34'53"W.ANIS A CHORD LENGTH OF 93.97 FIT 1,FOR A CURNE.[R HHR1:0F: THE'NCR: ALONG SAID CFR I: 10 110 1 ,AN ARC LLNGTII OF 94.20 FF(ETTO APOINT LOCATED ON A REVERSE CURVE TO THF RE[FIl WITH A RADTI: (W 163K.83 FEE"1',A CHORD BEARING OF N 07=;;3.44;"W,AND A CHORD LENG I11 OF 112.26 FI=:1:1.T URA(.VRNFR 14ERLOF; 1 HENCE: CONTINUING ALO_"�(*ti4,1 f;RFl F:RtiF CURVE TO THE BIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 112.28 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A COR V F HEHLOF; THENCE: N 00°18'00"W,A DISTANCE OF 84.81 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; I JIL'NC'E: N 00'17'08"W,A T]IS"1 ANCF OF 77.[}5 FF.I_"1'TOA PONT T OC.ATFD C7N A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 1VEl-H A RAL)IUS OF 638.5'7 I LL 1,A C'IIORT)RFARIN(i OF V U3"iJ7'54"f:,AN'D A CHORD LENGTH OF 76.16 FEET,FOR A CORNER IIEREOF; THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 76.21 FEET TO A FO1N f,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE. N05°5522"E,A DISTANCE OF 96.67 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ONA CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A FL1DIVS OF 35.56 FEET,A CHORD HEARING OF N 27°53'47"W,AND A CHORD LENG'T'H OF 48.08 FLLT,FOR A CORNFR H11Rf"OF: THENCE- ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE I FFT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 52.79 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A.RF'VERSE CURT TO THE RI(iHi WI'11[ A RADIUS OF 348.61 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 52°2615"W,ANDA('HOF_D LInNGTH OF 112.41 FEET,FORA CORNER HEREOF; THFNCF_ CON 11-NU1NG ALONG SAID R1 VERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 112.91 FFL"1 TOA POD,`F,FOR A CORNER HERE-OF; THENCE: N 41°14'16"W,A DISTANCE OF 79.4;4 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 67°58'17"W,A DISTANC:F OF 4.21 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; TRENC"E: N 3k 1U'10"W,AD:�I'ANCEOF46.88FEET TO A POINT,FOR ACORNER HEREOF, 'IH F:NC'E: N 0:` i'`" R••.; :)rti I:','tiCE OF 4.08 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RI(i1I-I 1VETH A 12.:1.1)11..�01 4"2-77 113 F,1,ACHORD BEARING OFN24°43'36"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH o"(4 1:4 11'1•L.i OF '.C(WN1-:K HLILLOF; 'I FIENCE: ALONG�AJ D(L,MZ 1:10 111K RIGH 1.AN ARC LENGTH OF 66.80 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 1015'25"1V,A DISTANCE OF 115.67 FEET TO A POINTLOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE RICH f WITH A RADIUS OF 133.47 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 10'19'44"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 98.40 FEET,FOR A CORNER HFREOF; TTIFNCF: A]-SNG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 100.78 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNLN HEREOF; THENCE: N 1.9°4940"E,A DISTANCE OC 126.03 FEET TO A POINT LOCATED ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT\Ml 1 A RADIUS OF 91.11 FEET,A CHORD BEARING OF N 05°22`28"E,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 33.76 FFFT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; 1I WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 75 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THS LL.FT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 33.95 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE* N 05°18'06"W,A DISTANCE OF 181.88 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 13136'58"W,A DISTANCE OF 55.06 FEET TO A POINT,FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: N 0915441"E,A DISTANCE OF 275.84 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD FOUND,FOR AN INTERIOR CORNER OF SAID LOT 27C,AND FOR A CORNER HEREOF; THENCE: S 89°10'01" E, CONTDCANG ALONG THE LOWER NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27C, A DISTANCE OF 229.01 FEET-1.0 THE POINT OF BEGINNING,COIN IAINING WITHIN THESE METES AND SOUNDS A 28.63-ACRE TRACT,MORE OR LESS; NOTE: AN EXHIBIT REPRESENTING A GRAPHIC INTACE OF THIS DESCRIPTION STYLED AS "SHEET I OF 5-28.63-ACRE TRACT"ACCOMPANIES THIS DOC U MINT.THE BASIS OF BEARING IS TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83,SOLI'1It ZONE 4205. F Se t=ber 28,2018 ¢T Ea P P.:tiiaREa q� ]ab Na. 170146 I.ROdarte R08GRr;WVIERF .......... Q.'Q- WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 76 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT J-2 -IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 36 L941.8550 IBPILS 1-1962 SURVEYING ?4'=LS 1;71'1)43 3"5 S:k,I ta[alcr;Yr,+Su 1,-1?-"f.nrpun f.'risli.Tc-?,n 72AI s November 21,2023 5001-0986-21143.101 Field Notes Description for a 51.03-Acre Tract Improvement Area#1,Tract 1 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § Field notes_to describe a 51.03-acre tract Improvement Area being out a portion of Tracts 27C and 27D of the Padre Island—Corpus Christi Island Fairway Estates,hereafter referred to as P.I.C.C-I.F.E.,Lots 27C and 271D;a map recorded in Volume 67, Pages 779-785,Map Records, Nueces County,Texas,a portion of P_I.C_C_I.F_E_. Blocks 24-33, a map recorded in Volume 40, pages 154-159, (Map Records, Nueces County,Texas,a portion of out of P.I.C.C.I.F.E., 'Blocks 43 & 44.a map recorded in Volume 42, Pages 10-11, Map Records_ Nueces County,Texas,and Portions of P.I_C_C.I_F.E_,(Blocks 34, 35, and 36, a map recorded in Volume 40, Pages 183-184, Map Records, Nueces County. Texas, said Blocks 26, 35, 36,437 44, and a portion of Block 34, now vacated as per plat recorded in Volume 67, Page 688,Map Records,Nueces County,Texas,said 51.03-acre tract being out of a porton of a 28.63- acre tract (Tract 1), a 72.31-acre tract (Tract 2), a 74.39-acre tract (Tract 3), and a 30.68-acre tract (Tract 4), as referenced in a correction warranty deed, Document Number 2018045542, Official Records, Nueces County,Texas,save and except 3.766 acres of a 80-foot wide street,also known as `Aquarius Street Re-Alignment', and recorded in Document Number 2011039226, Official Records, Nueces County, Texas, and said 51.03 acres more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; BEGINNING at a 5!8"iron rod found on said Lot 27C of the Padre Island-Corpus Christi Island Fairway Estates_and being on the south right of way of said Aquarius Street,and said iron rod being on a curve to the right, having a radius of 330.00', a length of curve of 106.74', a delta angle of 18°3158 and a chord bearing and distance of S 78`00'59' W. 106.28'for a corner of said 30.68-acre tract (Tract 4) for the POINT-OF-BEGINNING and northeast comer of this 51.1)3-acre tract; THENCE S 02°16'21"E,a distance of 47.77'to a 518"iron rod found, for an angle corner of this 51.03- acre tract; THENCE S 44°49'36"E,a distance of 217.18'to a point,for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract; THENCE S 45'10'24"W,a distance of 141.72'to a paint.for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract-, THENCE S 1)0`00'00"W.a distance of 685.33'to a point and a corner of this 51.03-acre tract.and said point being at the beginning of a curve to the left,having a radius of 393.00',a length of curve of 500.19, a delta angle of 72°55'227,and a chard bearing and distance of S 57'10'11' E,467-10" THENCE along said curve to the left,a curve length of 509.19'to a point of tangency of said curve.for a corner of this 51-03-acre tract; THENCE S 00°53'05"E,a distance 809.16'to a point,for an angle comer of this 51-03-acre tract, WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 77 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 51.03 Acre Tract Wvenber 21,2023 Page 2 of 3 THENCE S 89006'59" W, a distance of 62.78' to a point, for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract; THENCE N 80'07'55'W, a distance of 169.11' to a point.for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE S 47°34'11"W, a distance of 80.44'to a point_for an angle comer of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE N 39`02'15"W, a distance of 180.41'to a point, for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE N 87`28'42"W, a distance of 120.19'to a point, for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE S 51 027'50" W, a distance of 135.13' to a point_for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE S 30031'04" W, a distance of 270.15' to a point_for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE S 24°02'41 W, a distance of 249.57' to a point_for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE S 36'57'46- W. a distance of 160.17' to a paint on the north right of v:ay of Crown Royal,for an angle corner of this 51.03-acre tract= THENCE N 52053'11" W, along the north right of v:ay of Crown Royal, a distance of 229.48' to a point on the north right of way of Cro- n Royal, for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract and said paint being at the beginning of a curve to the Left_ having a radius of 1.718.10', a length of curve of 301.2T, a delta angle of '10°024B", and a chord bearing and distance of N 30°32'33" E, 300.88': THENCE along said curve to the left, a curve length of 301.27' to a point of tangency of said curve, for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract, and said point being at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 1.056.90', a length of curve of 387.02', a delta angle of 21'00'2B",and a chord bearing and distance of N 14'46'46- E. 385.35'; THENCE along said curve to the left, a curve length of 387.52' to a point of tangency of said curve; for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract; THENCE N 86`00'41" W, a distance of 119.90' to a point at the east right of way of Dasmarinas Drive, for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract; and said point being at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 940.79", a length of curve of 46'1.85', a delta angle of 28'07'40", and a chord bearing and distance of N 10'33'02'W;457.23': THENCE along said curve to the left, a curve length of 461.85' to a point of tangency of said curve; for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract and said point being at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 617.98', a length of curve of 425.59', a delta angle of 39'27'31"-, and a chord bearing and distance of N 44'45'25-W;417.23'; THENCE along said curve to the left, a curve length of 425.59' to a point of tangency of said curve; for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract; THENCE N 64`29'59" W, a distance of 5151.37' to a point, for a comer of this 51.03-acre tract and said point being at the beginning of curve to the right_ having a radius of 15.00'; a length of curve of 23.55', a delta angle of 89`57'56_, and a chord bearing and distance of N 19'31'01" W, 2121'; THENCE along said curve to the right, a curve length of 23.551'to a paint of tangency of said curve_ for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 78 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 51.03-Acre Tract November21,2023 Page 3 pl 3 THENCE N 25027'57"E. a distance of 288.75' to a point, for a oorner of this 51.03-acre tract and said point being at the beginning of curve to the right,having a radius of 330.110',a length of curve of 249.30', a delta angle of 43°17'02", and a chord bearing and distance of N 47°06'27"E,243,41';. THENCE along said curve to the right, a curve length of 249.30' to a point of tangency of said curve, for a corner of this 51,03-acre tract; THENCE N 68044'50" E, a distance of 1,071.44' to a point,for a corner of this 51.03-acre tract, and said point being at the beginnng of curve to the right, having a radius of 330.00', a length of curve of 106.74', a delta angle rif 1 B031'58",and a Chord bearing and distance of N 78000'59"E, 106.28% THENCE along Baia curve to the right,a curve length of 106.74'to the point of tangency and the POINT-OF-BEGINNING, and containing 51.03 acres, more or less. The bearings for this field notes description are based on GPS, NAC783,State Mane Coo rdinate System, Texas South Zone 4205. I, Albert E. Franco, Jr., Registered Professional Land Surveyor of Texas, do hereby cerlify that this description represents the actual perimeter of this 51,03-acre tract,this the 21'day of November 2023, !' AU -� Registered Professional LeAd Surveyor Texas Registration No. 4471 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 79 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT J-3 -THE PRESERVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 361-941.9SS0 TBP ELS F-19613 c T'BpELS 10194382 '"V&LJ 4:r�r 7c•rri 5350 Snaith Staples Str"t,Suikc•J7,.f.orp �f.Frisli.-A•,,72.1 1 November 21,2023 S001-0988-21143.101 Field Notes Description for a 4.64-Acre Tract Improvement Area#1.Tract 2 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § Field nates,to describe a 4.64-acre tract being out a portion of Tracts 27D of the Padre Island—Corpus Christi Island Fairway Estates, hereafter referred to as P-I.C-C.I.F-E., Lots 27C and 27D, a map recorded in Volume 67, Pages 779-785, Map Records. Nueces County. Texas, said 4-64-acre tract being out of a portion of a 74.39-acre tract (Tract 3), as referenced in a correction v.arranhr deed. Document Number 2018045542, Official Records, Nueces County, Texas, and said 4.64 acres more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 518" iron rod found at the southeast corner of Lot 24, Block 30 of the Padre Island- Corpus Christi Island Fairway Estates, recorded in Volume 40. Pages 181-182, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas,.for the POINT-OF-BEGINNING and interior corner of this 4-64-acre tract, THENCE N 30°50'45"E, a distance of 235.05'to a point,for an angle corner of this 4.64-acre tract: THENCE N 23`48'25"W,a distance of 259.46'to a point_for an angle corner of this 4.64-acre tract, THENCE N 39`34'30"E, a distance of 224.73'to a paint,for an angle corner of this 4.64-acre tract; THENCE S 57`43'56"E, a distance of 100.42'to a point and a corner of this 4-64-acre tract, and said point being at the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 170.00, a length of curve of 157.54',a delta angle of 63`05'43-.and a chord bearing and distance of S 33'35'14" E, 15'1-96'. THENCE along said curve to the right, a curve length of 157,54'to a point of tangency of said curve, for a corner of this 4-64-acre tract, THENCE S C7°02'23"E,a distance 182.93'to a point, for an angle corner of this 4.64-acre tract-, THENCE 5 '11'4T41"W, a distance of 257.61'to a point,for a corner of this 4.64-acre tract and said point being at the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 260.00,a length of curve of 352.28',a delta angle of 77`37'36-,and a chord bearing and distance of S 50°36'29`W.32593',- THENCE 2593';THENCE along said curve to the right, a curve length of 352.25'to a point of tangency of said curve, for a comer of this 4-64-acre tract; THENCE N 00`34'43" W, a distance of 105.00'to a point,for a corner of this 4-64-acre tract and said paint being at the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 155.00', a length of curve of 84.98',a delta angle of 31'24'50",and a chord bearing and distance of N 74'52'18"W. 83.92; WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 80 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 4,64-Acre Trnt November 21, 2023 Page 2 012 THENCE along said curve to the right,a cLfve length at 84.98'to a point of tangency of said curve, for a c;o�ner of INS 4,64-acre tract; THENCE N 59'09'53"W,a distance of 112-06'to a point, for an exterior comer of this 4-64-acre fraCt, THENCE 5 83007'14"W.a distance of 9AW to a point,for a corner of this 4.64-acre tract and said point be,nq rat the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 104.82', a length of curve of 62.2$', a de`a angle of 34106'20";and a chord bearing and distance of N 31°30'06" E. 61.36': THENCE along said curve to the left, a curve length of 62.28'to a point of tangency of said curve,for a corner of this 4.84-acre tract; THENCE S 76'03'33"E, a distance of 112.87'to a paint,for an angle corner and the POINT-OF-BEGINNING,and containing 4.64 acres, more or less. The bearings for this yield notes description are based on GPS,NAG43,State Plane Coordinate System, Texas South Zone 4205- 1. Albert E. Franco, Jr., Registered Professional Land Surveyor of Texas, do hereby certify that this description represents the actual perimeter of this 4.84-acre tract,this the 2111 day of November 2023, �aA�' F— �'4cT�:� ti��cJo ��f Ftegistered Professeyor Texas Registration No. 4471 WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 81 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN APPENDIX A — ENGINEER'S REPORT [Remainder of page left intentionally blank.] WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 82 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN APPENDIX B — BUYER DISCLOSURES Forms of the buyer disclosures for the following Lot Types are found in this appendix: Improvement Area #1 ■ Initial Parcel ■ Lot Type 1 ■ Lot Type 2 ■ Lot Type 3 ■ Lot Type 4 ■ Lot Type 5 ■ Lot Type 6 ■ Lot Type 7 [Remainder of page left intentionally blank.] WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 83 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 INITIAL PARCEL BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: I) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 INITIAL PARCEL PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $23,856,000 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 INITIAL PARCEL PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 290,000 $ 1,483,843 $ 40,000 $ 1,813,843 2026 $ 308,000 $ 1,465,805 $ 40,800 $ 1,814,605 2027 $ 327,000 $ 1,446,648 $ 41,616 $ 1,815,264 2028 $ 348,000 $ 1,426,308 $ 42,448 $ 1,816,757 2029 $ 369,000 $ 1,404,663 $ 43,297 $ 1,816,960 2030 $ 392,000 $ 1,381,711 $ 44,163 $ 1,817,874 2031 $ 417,000 $ 1,357,328 $ 45,046 $ 1,819,375 2032 $ 443,000 $ 1,331,391 $ 45,947 $ 1,820,338 2033 $ 470,000 $ 1,303,836 $ 46,866 $ 1,820,703 2034 $ 500,000 $ 1,274,602 $ 47,804 $ 1,822,406 2035 $ 531,000 $ 1,243,502 $ 48,760 $ 1,823,262 2036 $ 564,000 $ 1,210,474 $ 49,735 $ 1,824,209 2037 $ 599,000 $ 1,175,393 $ 50,730 $ 1,825,123 2038 $ 636,000 $ 1,138,136 $ 51,744 $ 1,825,880 2039 $ 676,000 $ 1,098,576 $ 52,779 $ 1,827,356 2040 $ 718,000 $ 1,056,529 $ 53,835 $ 1,828,364 2041 $ 762,000 $ 1,011,870 $ 54,911 $ 1,828,781 2042 $ 810,000 $ 964,473 $ 56,010 $ 1,830,483 2043 $ 860,000 $ 914,091 $ 57,130 $ 1,831,221 2044 $ 914,000 $ 860,599 $ 58,272 $ 1,832,872 2045 $ 970,000 $ 803,748 $ 59,438 $ 1,833,186 2046 $ 1,031,000 $ 743,414 $ 60,627 $ 1,835,041 2047 $ 1,095,000 $ 679,286 $ 61,839 $ 1,836,125 2048 $ 1,163,000 $ 611,177 $ 63,076 $ 1,837,253 2049 $ 1,235,000 $ 538,839 $ 64,337 $ 1,838,176 2050 $ 1,312,000 $ 462,022 $ 65,624 $ 1,839,646 2051 $ 1,394,000 $ 380,415 $ 66,937 $ 1,841,352 2052 $ 1,480,000 $ 293,708 $ 68,275 $ 1,841,984 2053 $ 1,572,000 $ 201,652 $ 69,641 $ 1,843,293 2054 $ 1,670,000 $ 103,874 $ 71,034 $ 1,844,908 Total $ 23,856,000 $ 29,367,917 $ 1,622,723 $ 54,846,640 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 1 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: I) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 1 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $78,510.14 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 1 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 954.39 $ 4,883.33 $ 131.64 $ 5,969.36 2026 $ 1,013.63 $ 4,823.97 $ 134.27 $ 5,971.87 2027 $ 1,076.16 $ 4,760.92 $ 136.96 $ 5,974.04 2028 $ 1,145.27 $ 4,693.98 $ 139.70 $ 5,978.95 2029 $ 1,214.38 $ 4,622.75 $ 142.49 $ 5,979.62 2030 $ 1,290.07 $ 4,547.21 $ 145.34 $ 5,982.63 2031 $ 1,372.35 $ 4,466.97 $ 148.25 $ 5,987.57 2032 $ 1,457.91 $ 4,381.61 $ 151.21 $ 5,990.74 2033 $ 1,546.77 $ 4,290.93 $ 154.24 $ 5,991.94 2034 $ 1,645.50 $ 4,194.72 $ 157.32 $ 5,997.54 2035 $ 1,747.52 $ 4,092.37 $ 160.47 $ 6,000.36 2036 $ 1,856.13 $ 3,983.67 $ 163.68 $ 6,003.48 2037 $ 1,971.31 $ 3,868.22 $ 166.95 $ 6,006.48 2038 $ 2,093.08 $ 3,745.61 $ 170.29 $ 6,008.97 2039 $ 2,224.72 $ 3,615.42 $ 173.70 $ 6,013.83 2040 $ 2,362.94 $ 3,477.04 $ 177.17 $ 6,017.15 2041 $ 2,507.74 $ 3,330.06 $ 180.71 $ 6,018.52 2042 $ 2,665.71 $ 3,174.08 $ 184.33 $ 6,024.12 2043 $ 2,830.26 $ 3,008.28 $ 188.01 $ 6,026.55 2044 $ 3,007.98 $ 2,832.23 $ 191.77 $ 6,031.98 2045 $ 3,192.27 $ 2,645.14 $ 195.61 $ 6,033.02 2046 $ 3,393.02 $ 2,446.58 $ 199.52 $ 6,039.12 2047 $ 3,603.65 $ 2,235.53 $ 203.51 $ 6,042.69 2048 $ 3,827.44 $ 2,011.39 $ 207.58 $ 6,046.40 2049 $ 4,064.39 $ 1,773.32 $ 211.73 $ 6,049.44 2050 $ 4,317.79 $ 1,520.51 $ 215.97 $ 6,054.28 2051 $ 4,587.66 $ 1,251.95 $ 220.29 $ 6,059.89 2052 $ 4,870.68 $ 966.59 $ 224.69 $ 6,061.97 2053 $ 5,173.46 $ 663.64 $ 229.19 $ 6,066.28 2054 $ 5,495.97 $ 341.85 $ 233.77 $ 6,071.60 Total $ 78,510.14 $ 96,649.87 $ 5,340.39 $ 180,500.40 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 2 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller;.to or from a governmental entity; or 8) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 2 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $94,212.17 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 2 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 1,145.27 $ 5,860.00 $ 157.97 $ 7,163.23 2026 $ 1,216.35 $ 5,788.76 $ 161.13 $ 7,166.24 2027 $ 1,291.39 $ 5,713.10 $ 164.35 $ 7,168.84 2028 $ 1,374.32 $ 5,632.78 $ 167.64 $ 7,174.74 2029 $ 1,457.26 $ 5,547.30 $ 170.99 $ 7,175.54 2030 $ 1,548.09 $ 5,456.66 $ 174.41 $ 7,179.15 2031 $ 1,646.82 $ 5,360.36 $ 177.90 $ 7,185.08 2032 $ 1,749.50 $ 5,257.93 $ 181.46 $ 7,188.88 2033 $ 1,856.13 $ 5,149.11 $ 185.08 $ 7,190.32 2034 $ 1,974.60 $ 5,033.66 $ 188.79 $ 7,197.05 2035 $ 2,097.03 $ 4,910.84 $ 192.56 $ 7,200.43 2036 $ 2,227.35 $ 4,780.41 $ 196.41 $ 7,204.17 2037 $ 2,365.57 $ 4,641.87 $ 200.34 $ 7,207.78 2038 $ 2,511.69 $ 4,494.73 $ 204.35 $ 7,210.77 2039 $ 2,669.66 $ 4,338.50 $ 208.44 $ 7,216.60 2040 $ 2,835.53 $ 4,172.45 $ 212.60 $ 7,220.58 2041 $ 3,009.29 $ 3,996.08 $ 216.86 $ 7,222.23 2042 $ 3,198.85 $ 3,808.90 $ 221.19 $ 7,228.95 2043 $ 3,396.31 $ 3,609.93 $ 225.62 $ 7,231.86 2044 $ 3,609.57 $ 3,398.68 $ 230.13 $ 7,238.38 2045 $ 3,830.73 $ 3,174.17 $ 234.73 $ 7,239.62 2046 $ 4,071.63 $ 2,935.89 $ 239.43 $ 7,246.95 2047 $ 4,324.38 $ 2,682.64 $ 244.22 $ 7,251.23 2048 $ 4,592.92 $ 2,413.66 $ 249.10 $ 7,255.68 2049 $ 4,877.26 $ 2,127.98 $ 254.08 $ 7,259.33 2050 $ 5,181.35 $ 1,824.62 $ 259.16 $ 7,265.13 2051 $ 5,505.19 $ 1,502.34 $ 264.35 $ 7,271.87 2052 $ 5,844.82 $ 1,159.91 $ 269.63 $ 7,274.37 2053 $ 6,208.15 $ 796.37 $ 275.03 $ 7,279.54 2054 $ 6,595.17 $ 410.22 $ 280.53 $ 7,285.91 Total $ 94,212.17 $ 115,979.85 $ 6,408.46 $ 216,600.48 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 3 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court- ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 3 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $106,219.61 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 3 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 1,291.23 $ 6,606.86 $ 178.10 $ 8,076.20 2026 $ 1,371.38 $ 6,526.54 $ 181.66 $ 8,079.59 2027 $ 1,455.98 $ 6,441.24 $ 185.30 $ 8,082.52 2028 $ 1,549.48 $ 6,350.68 $ 189.00 $ 8,089.17 2029 $ 1,642.98 $ 6,254.31 $ 192.78 $ 8,090.07 2030 $ 1,745.39 $ 6,152.11 $ 196.64 $ 8,094.14 2031 $ 1,856.71 $ 6,043.55 $ 200.57 $ 8,100.83 2032 $ 1,972.47 $ 5,928.06 $ 204.58 $ 8,105.12 2033 $ 2,092.69 $ 5,805.37 $ 208.67 $ 8,106.74 2034 $ 2,226.27 $ 5,675.21 $ 212.85 $ 8,114.32 2035 $ 2,364.29 $ 5,536.73 $ 217.10 $ 8,118.13 2036 $ 2,511.23 $ 5,389.68 $ 221.45 $ 8,122.35 2037 $ 2,667.07 $ 5,233.48 $ 225.88 $ 8,126.42 2038 $ 2,831.81 $ 5,067.59 $ 230.39 $ 8,129.79 2039 $ 3,009.91 $ 4,891.45 $ 235.00 $ 8,136.36 2040 $ 3,196.92 $ 4,704.23 $ 239.70 $ 8,140.85 2041 $ 3,392.83 $ 4,505.38 $ 244.49 $ 8,142.71 2042 $ 3,606.55 $ 4,294.35 $ 249.38 $ 8,150.28 2043 $ 3,829.18 $ 4,070.02 $ 254.37 $ 8,153.57 2044 $ 4,069.61 $ 3,831.85 $ 259.46 $ 8,160.92 2045 $ 4,318.96 $ 3,578.72 $ 264.65 $ 8,162.32 2046 $ 4,590.56 $ 3,310.08 $ 269.94 $ 8,170.58 2047 $ 4,875.52 $ 3,024.54 $ 275.34 $ 8,175.41 2048 $ 5,178.29 $ 2,721.29 $ 280.85 $ 8,180.43 2049 $ 5,498.88 $ 2,399.20 $ 286.46 $ 8,184.54 2050 $ 5,841.72 $ 2,057.17 $ 292.19 $ 8,191.08 2051 $ 6,206.83 $ 1,693.81 $ 298.04 $ 8,198.68 2052 $ 6,589.75 $ 1,307.75 $ 304.00 $ 8,201.49 2053 $ 6,999.38 $ 897.86 $ 310.08 $ 8,207.32 2054 $ 7,435.73 $ 462.50 $ 316.28 $ 8,214.51 Total $ 106,219.61 $ 130,761.59 $ 7,225.23 $ 244,206.43 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 4 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 4 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $127,463.53 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 LOT TYPE 4 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 1,549.48 $ 7,928.23 $ 213.72 $ 9,691.43 2026 $ 1,645.66 $ 7,831.85 $ 218.00 $ 9,695.51 2027 $ 1,747.17 $ 7,729.49 $ 222.36 $ 9,699.02 2028 $ 1,859.38 $ 7,620.82 $ 226.80 $ 9,707.00 2029 $ 1,971.58 $ 7,505.17 $ 231.34 $ 9,708.09 2030 $ 2,094.47 $ 7,382.53 $ 235.97 $ 9,712.97 2031 $ 2,228.05 $ 7,252.26 $ 240.69 $ 9,720.99 2032 $ 2,366.97 $ 7,113.67 $ 245.50 $ 9,726.14 2033 $ 2,511.23 $ 6,966.45 $ 250.41 $ 9,728.09 2034 $ 2,671.52 $ 6,810.25 $ 255.42 $ 9,737.19 2035 $ 2,837.15 $ 6,644.08 $ 260.53 $ 9,741.76 2036 $ 3,013.47 $ 6,467.61 $ 265.74 $ 9,746.82 2037 $ 3,200.48 $ 6,280.17 $ 271.05 $ 9,751.70 2038 $ 3,398.17 $ 6,081.10 $ 276.47 $ 9,755.75 2039 $ 3,611.89 $ 5,869.74 $ 282.00 $ 9,763.63 2040 $ 3,836.30 $ 5,645.08 $ 287.64 $ 9,769.02 2041 $ 4,071.40 $ 5,406.46 $ 293.39 $ 9,771.25 2042 $ 4,327.86 $ 5,153.22 $ 299.26 $ 9,780.34 2043 $ 4,595.01 $ 4,884.02 $ 305.25 $ 9,784.28 2044 $ 4,883.54 $ 4,598.21 $ 311.35 $ 9,793.10 2045 $ 5,182.75 $ 4,294.46 $ 317.58 $ 9,794.79 2046 $ 5,508.67 $ 3,972.09 $ 323.93 $ 9,804.70 2047 $ 5,850.63 $ 3,629.45 $ 330.41 $ 9,810.49 2048 $ 6,213.95 $ 3,265.54 $ 337.02 $ 9,816.51 2049 $ 6,598.65 $ 2,879.04 $ 343.76 $ 9,821.45 2050 $ 7,010.07 $ 2,468.60 $ 350.63 $ 9,829.30 2051 $ 7,448.20 $ 2,032.57 $ 357.65 $ 9,838.41 2052 $ 7,907.70 $ 1,569.30 $ 364.80 $ 9,841.79 2053 $ 8,399.26 $ 1,077.44 $ 372.09 $ 9,848.79 2054 $ 8,922.87 $ 555.00 $ 379.54 $ 9,857.41 Total $ 127,463.53 $ 156,913.91 $ 8,670.27 $ 293,047.71 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 5 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: I) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 5 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $138,547.31 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 5 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 1,684.22 $ 8,617.64 $ 232.31 $ 10,534.17 2026 $ 1,788.76 $ 8,512.88 $ 236.95 $ 10,538.59 2027 $ 1,899.10 $ 8,401.62 $ 241.69 $ 10,542.42 2028 $ 2,021.06 $ 8,283.50 $ 246.53 $ 10,551.09 2029 $ 2,143.02 $ 8,157.79 $ 251.46 $ 10,552.27 2030 $ 2,276.60 $ 8,024.49 $ 256.48 $ 10,557.58 2031 $ 2,421.79 $ 7,882.89 $ 261.61 $ 10,566.29 2032 $ 2,572.79 $ 7,732.25 $ 266.85 $ 10,571.89 2033 $ 2,729.60 $ 7,572.23 $ 272.18 $ 10,574.01 2034 $ 2,903.83 $ 7,402.45 $ 277.63 $ 10,583.90 2035 $ 3,083.86 $ 7,221.83 $ 283.18 $ 10,588.87 2036 $ 3,275.51 $ 7,030.01 $ 288.84 $ 10,594.37 2037 $ 3,478.78 $ 6,826.27 $ 294.62 $ 10,599.68 2038 $ 3,693.67 $ 6,609.89 $ 300.51 $ 10,604.07 2039 $ 3,925.97 $ 6,380.15 $ 306.52 $ 10,612.64 2040 $ 4,169.89 $ 6,135.95 $ 312.65 $ 10,618.50 2041 $ 4,425.43 $ 5,876.59 $ 318.91 $ 10,620.92 2042 $ 4,704.20 $ 5,601.32 $ 325.28 $ 10,630.80 2043 $ 4,994.58 $ 5,308.72 $ 331.79 $ 10,635.09 2044 $ 5,308.19 $ 4,998.06 $ 338.43 $ 10,644.68 2045 $ 5,633.42 $ 4,667.89 $ 345.19 $ 10,646.51 2046 $ 5,987.69 $ 4,317.49 $ 352.10 $ 10,657.28 2047 $ 6,359.38 $ 3,945.06 $ 359.14 $ 10,663.57 2048 $ 6,754.30 $ 3,549.50 $ 366.32 $ 10,670.12 2049 $ 7,172.45 $ 3,129.39 $ 373.65 $ 10,675.48 2050 $ 7,619.64 $ 2,683.26 $ 381.12 $ 10,684.02 2051 $ 8,095.86 $ 2,209.32 $ 388.75 $ 10,693.93 2052 $ 8,595.32 $ 1,705.76 $ 396.52 $ 10,697.60 2053 $ 9,129.63 $ 1,171.13 $ 404.45 $ 10,705.20 2054 $ 9,698.78 $ 603.26 $ 412.54 $ 10,714.58 Total $ 138,547.31 $ 170,558.60 $ 9,424.21 $ 318,530.12 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 6 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1)under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2)by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3)to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4)by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5)by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6)from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7)to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8)to or from a governmental entity; or 9)of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 6 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $166,256.78 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 6 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 2,021.06 $ 10,341.17 $ 278.77 $ 12,641.00 2026 $ 2,146.51 $ 10,215.46 $ 284.34 $ 12,646.31 2027 $ 2,278.92 $ 10,081.95 $ 290.03 $ 12,650.90 2028 $ 2,425.27 $ 9,940.20 $ 295.83 $ 12,661.30 2029 $ 2,571.63 $ 9,789.35 $ 301.75 $ 12,662.72 2030 $ 2,731.92 $ 9,629.39 $ 307.78 $ 12,669.09 2031 $ 2,906.15 $ 9,459.47 $ 313.94 $ 12,679.55 2032 $ 3,087.35 $ 9,278.70 $ 320.22 $ 12,686.27 2033 $ 3,275.51 $ 9,086.67 $ 326.62 $ 12,688.81 2034 $ 3,484.59 $ 8,882.93 $ 333.15 $ 12,700.68 2035 $ 3,700.63 $ 8,666.19 $ 339.82 $ 12,706.64 2036 $ 3,930.62 $ 8,436.01 $ 346.61 $ 12,713.24 2037 $ 4,174.54 $ 8,191.53 $ 353.54 $ 12,719.61 2038 $ 4,432.40 $ 7,931.87 $ 360.62 $ 12,724.89 2039 $ 4,711.17 $ 7,656.18 $ 367.83 $ 12,735.17 2040 $ 5,003.87 $ 7,363.14 $ 375.18 $ 12,742.20 2041 $ 5,310.52 $ 7,051.90 $ 382.69 $ 12,745.11 2042 $ 5,645.04 $ 6,721.59 $ 390.34 $ 12,756.97 2043 $ 5,993.50 $ 6,370.47 $ 398.15 $ 12,762.11 2044 $ 6,369.83 $ 5,997.67 $ 406.11 $ 12,773.61 2045 $ 6,760.11 $ 5,601.47 $ 414.23 $ 12,775.81 2046 $ 7,185.23 $ 5,180.99 $ 422.52 $ 12,788.73 2047 $ 7,631.25 $ 4,734.07 $ 430.97 $ 12,796.29 2048 $ 8,105.16 $ 4,259.40 $ 439.59 $ 12,804.15 2049 $ 8,606.94 $ 3,755.26 $ 448.38 $ 12,810.58 2050 $ 9,143.57 $ 3,219.91 $ 457.35 $ 12,820.82 2051 $ 9,715.04 $ 2,651.18 $ 466.49 $ 12,832.71 2052 $ 10,314.39 $ 2,046.91 $ 475.82 $ 12,837.12 2053 $ 10,955.55 $ 1,405.35 $ 485.34 $ 12,846.24 2054 $ 11,638.53 $ 723.92 $ 495.05 $ 12,857.50 Total $ 166,256.78 $ 204,670.32 $ 11,309.05 $ 382,236.15 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment WHITECAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 7 BUYER DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9)of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice,the purchaser,subject to certain exceptions,is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 7 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $221,675.70 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to City of Corpus Christi, Texas,for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Whitecap Public Improvement District No. I (the "District")created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Corpus Christi. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Corpus Christi City Council in the annual service plan update for the District. More information about the assessments,including the amounts and due dates,may be obtained from City of Corpus Christi. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1),Tex. Prop.Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20 . Notary Public, State of Texas]' 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143,Tex. Prop.Code,to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Nueces County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - IMPROVEMENT AREA#1 LOT TYPE 7 PrincipalInstallment [a] Annual Collection • Due 1/31 2025 $ 2,694.75 $ 13,788.23 $ 371.69 $ 16,854.67 2026 $ 2,862.01 $ 13,620.62 $ 379.12 $ 16,861.75 2027 $ 3,038.56 $ 13,442.60 $ 386.71 $ 16,867.87 2028 $ 3,233.70 $ 13,253.60 $ 394.44 $ 16,881.74 2029 $ 3,428.84 $ 13,052.46 $ 402.33 $ 16,883.63 2030 $ 3,642.56 $ 12,839.19 $ 410.38 $ 16,892.12 2031 $ 3,874.86 $ 12,612.62 $ 418.58 $ 16,906.07 2032 $ 4,116.46 $ 12,371.61 $ 426.95 $ 16,915.02 2033 $ 4,367.35 $ 12,115.56 $ 435.49 $ 16,918.41 2034 $ 4,646.12 $ 11,843.91 $ 444.20 $ 16,934.24 2035 $ 4,934.18 $ 11,554.92 $ 453.09 $ 16,942.19 2036 $ 5,240.82 $ 11,248.02 $ 462.15 $ 16,950.99 2037 $ 5,566.05 $ 10,922.04 $ 471.39 $ 16,959.48 2038 $ 5,909.87 $ 10,575.83 $ 480.82 $ 16,966.52 2039 $ 6,281.55 $ 10,208.24 $ 490.44 $ 16,980.23 2040 $ 6,671.83 $ 9,817.52 $ 500.25 $ 16,989.60 2041 $ 7,080.69 $ 9,402.54 $ 510.25 $ 16,993.47 2042 $ 7,526.72 $ 8,962.12 $ 520.46 $ 17,009.29 2043 $ 7,991.33 $ 8,493.96 $ 530.86 $ 17,016.15 2044 $ 8,493.11 $ 7,996.90 $ 541.48 $ 17,031.49 2045 $ 9,013.47 $ 7,468.62 $ 552.31 $ 17,034.41 2046 $ 9,580.30 $ 6,907.99 $ 563.36 $ 17,051.64 2047 $ 10,175.00 $ 6,312.09 $ 574.62 $ 17,061.72 2048 $ 10,806.88 $ 5,679.21 $ 586.12 $ 17,072.20 2049 $ 11,475.92 $ 5,007.02 $ 597.84 $ 17,080.78 2050 $ 12,191.42 $ 4,293.22 $ 609.80 $ 17,094.43 2051 $ 12,953.38 $ 3,534.91 $ 621.99 $ 17,110.29 2052 $ 13,752.52 $ 2,729.21 $ 634.43 $ 17,116.16 2053 $ 14,607.40 $ 1,873.80 $ 647.12 $ 17,128.33 2054 $ 15,518.04 $ 965.22 $ 660.06 $ 17,143.33 Total $ 221,675.70 $ 272,893.76 $ 15,078.73 $ 509,648.19 Footnotes: [a] Interest is calculated at a 6.22% rate for illustrative purposes. [b]The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings,or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment w � r I ,I Whitecap Public A , w Improvement District #1 n Development Master Plan I _ MIN MASTER PLAN z � �i a4`2+' ♦ ��" >�Ay ? '�,fd .f _ ..,�„``� �p� w ,vQ'> ;, a '/ '�•. ...,:�,l�i°. I� ��+'�. .'+d �;i ,1+4' ,'� �'_i.\,",I�.�n �Yl`'oA�°"Y`.. �� :. 3�'�� '� a,�`,�l�s�l'�.o'►e� ��C�� `P� �4Q`.. w 7 ■ Authority: Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code ■ Purpose: Improvements which benefit a defined area are paid with special assessments. New development pays for itself ■ Improvements: Improvements are paid from PID Overviewassessment revenues. Costs can be shared with TIRZ ■ Financing Options: "Pay-as-you-go" or bond financed. Under either financing option, funding comes exclusively from special assessments.. Special Assessment Bonds are non-recourse and are neither secured by nor payable from the City's general faith and credit Public Infrastructure and Improvements including: ■ Pedestrian sidewalks, streets, any other roadways, or their rights-of-way ■ Parks ■ Water, Wastewater or Drainage Infrastructure ID Authorized • ■ Easements for publicly owned utilities Improvements ■ Projects "similar"to this list ■ Expenses Incurred in Establishing,Administrating, and Operating the PID Owners of taxable real property within the proposed PID boundaries submit application for creation of PID to the City City Council adopts a resolution accepting the PID application and authorizes publication of notice of public hearing -• City publishes Notice of Public Hearing in newspaper PIDCreation -• City Council conducts Public Hearing concerning creation of PID Assessments -• City Council adopts a resolution creating the PID and City Council files a copy of the creation resolution with the County Clerk. Note that Administration a PID is not a separate governmental entity;it is governed by the City Council _ City Council adopts a resolution approving the preliminary service and assessment plan City Council adopts an ordinance levying assessments and approving a Service and Assessment Plan("SAP") A third-party"PID Administrator"can assist with billing of assessments to property owners,collection of assessments,&administrative oversight of the PID Approve a resolution determining the costs of improvements and approving ' a Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan(PSAP)for Improvement Area#i • City publishes Notice of Public Hearing in newspaperto call a public hearing ' ' ry • for February 1-3,2024 In M 0 February Hold a public hearing,approve the Service and Assessment plan(SAP),the developer reimbursement agreement,and levy an assessment for 13 Improvement Area#i M M AugUSt Approve issuance of PID bonds for reimbursement of costs perthe SAP for • Improvement Area#i City Staff Developer Underwriter (Ashlar Development) (FMS Bonds, Inc) Financial Advisor (Specialized Public Developer's Counsel Underwriter's WorkGroup Finance, Inc.) (Shupe Ventura, PLLC) Counsel Bond Counsel Property Owner (Norton Rose Fulbright (Diamond Beach US LLP) Holdings, LLC) PID Consultant and Administrator (P3 Works, LLC) V **All costs,including professional services,are paid by the Developer or assessment revenues. September 2021-Whitecap PID application was submitted on with the petition submitted February 2022 March 2022-City Council was briefed on the concepts of PIDs,Texas Local Government Code Chapter 372 and comparisons of economic development ............. groun • on tools and the Whitecap Preserve Project was introduced April 2022 Whitecap Ashlar Development introduced the Whitecap Public Improvement Public District #1 Improvement Public Hearing set to accept the Petition May 2022-Approved the creation of the Whitecap Public Improvement District District #1 Since May 2022 the City Team has worked with the WhitecapTeam to produce improvement plans with a list of anticipated improvements, a master development agreement, reimbursement agreement, finance plan, assessment plans and rolls, and service and assessment plan u� October 2022-TIRZ #2 approved funding for $11.5 million in reimbursement for public infrastructure including: Two public pedestrian mobility bridges Commodores Drive mobility bridge ac groun on Preserve community walking trail WhitecapAquarius Street box culvert water exchange and channel Encantada Avenue mobility bridge P • September 2023-TIRZ #2 approved funding for an additional $14.0 million • rovemeInn in reimbursements for public infrastructure including: Additional funding for Commodores Bridge District :77= Aquarius Street water quality circulation aqueduct Kayak launches at public parks Aquarius Street canal walk Public mobility bridge at Park Road 22 Effluent water line to ponds in the Preserve and pond interconnectivity �u IV Irl provement Area N y Common to All Improvements Preserve-signage, lighting, hardscape, screening walls,trails, sidewalks, pathways, playgrounds,furnishings, irrigation systems and soft costs ImprovementArea #1 Improvements Improvement Streets-roadways, lighting, signage and soft costs Area Drainage-storm drainage improvements and soft costs Water-improvements to provide water service to all lots in improvement A ut h • ri ze area #i including soft costs Improvements Wastewater-improvements to provide wastewater service to all lots in improvement area #i including soft costs Bond Issuance Costs-debt service fund, capitalized interest, underwriters discount, and costs of issuance Other Costs-deposit to the administrative fund amount necessary to fund the first year's annual collection costs PSAP contains a listing of all allowed improvements, costs of the improvements, and the maximum assessment for each lot type Authorized Improvements Cost Preserve $3.2 M Streets $17.1 nary Drainage $1.6M Water $1.7M Wastewater $3.2M Soft Costs $3.4M 7vice Community Amenities, Parks, & Landscaping $10.7M Debt Service Reserve $1.8M Cost of Issuance, Underwriter's Discount,Admin Fund $2.4M Total $45-IM Funding PID Bonds-Improvement Area#1 $23.9M Future Improvement Area $2.4M �u Developer Contribution s18.8M Total $45-IM February 1-3-Public Hearing and first reading of ordinance to approve the SAP, developer reimbursement agreement, and levy the assessment February zo-Second reading of the ordinance August 2024-Approve issuance of$23.91M in PID bonds for Improvement Area #i City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street � Corpus Christi,TX 78401 !+ cctexas.com 4 , Meeting Minutes City Council Thursday, November 16, 2023 12:00 PMnerican Bank Center, 1901 N Shoreline Blvd, 2nd Floor Watergarden Room A Joint Workshop of the City Council and Planning Commission A. Mayor Paulette Guajardo to call the meeting to order. Mayor Guajardo called the meeting to order at 12:12 p.m. B. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the City Council, Planning Commission, and required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Peter Zanoni, City Attorney Miles Risley and City Secretary Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the Planning Commission was present to conduct the meeting. Present-Michael Budd, Michael M. Miller, Billy A. Lerma, Jahvid R. Motaghi, Mike A. Munoz, Michael C. York, Brian S. Mandel, Cynthia S. Garza, and Justin Hedrick; Absent-Benjamin Polak Present: 8- Mayor Paulette Guajardo,Council Member Roland Barrera,Council Member Gil Hernandez,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Mike Pusley,Council Member Dan Suckley,Council Member Jim Klein, and Council Member Sylvia Campos Absent: 1 - Council Member Everett Roy C. Introductions and Discussion Guidelines Director of Development Services Al Raymond stated that Development Services has been working on the Master Plans and Impact Fee Study for over two years. Director Raymond introduced Managing Principal of Pape Dawson Engineers Cara Tackett and Managing Vice President of Pape Dawson Engineers Kim Keefer. D. BRIEFINGS: 1. 23-1863 Land Use, Master Plans, and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects Managing Vice President with Pape Dawson Engineers Kim Keefer presented information on the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and impact fee process as follows: Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC); and timeline of CIAC City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes November 16,2023 meetings. There were no questions from the Council or the Planning Commission. Kim Keefer presented information on the Land Use Assumptions as follows: area development plans (ADPs); traffic analysis; land use; process; alternative data; CIAC input; growth-near term (households); and growth-near term (employees). Council Members, Planning Commission and Ms. Keefer discussed the following topics: the Six Points area is considered Midtown/Bayside; a request to include the population growth number instead of just a percentage; whether an analysis exists from the past ten years of new rooftops versus the actual population growth, as well as new home permits versus actual population growth; and within the last 20 years, what three years had the highest population growth. Kim Keefer presented information on Water as follows: project scope; water master plan CIP sources; projected water supply, treatment and demand; water sources and supply lines; water and treatment; distribution system; near term improvements; and 10-year improvements. Council Members, Planning Commission, City Manager Peter Zanoni, Ms. Keefer, Ms. Tackett, Director Raymond, and Assistant Director of Corpus Christi Water Nick Winklemann discussed the following topics: the typical life of a pipe is about 50 years; pipe studies in coastal cities versus inland cities; large volume water users were not included in this study; the Inner Harbor desalination site would be blended with current ground storage tanks; the Master Plan did not include the cost of the duel pipe system; many industries currently use reclaimed water; Pape Dawson was engaged in the Master Planning for potable water; the $10 million for water sources and supply lines is for planning, design and phase 1; and the current goal is to present the Master Plan, not show how the impact fees are allocated. Kim Keefer presented information on Wastewater as follows: wastewater six areas; existing sewer basins; Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) future flows and expansions; lift stations; wastewater master plan format; near term improvements; ultimate projects; and wastewater master plan summary. Council Members, Planning Commission, City Manager Zanoni, and Ms. Keefer discussed the following topics: the consent agreement is for a total of fifteen years; a concern about the lack of lift stations in District 2; the wastewater facility needs to be expanded when the average daily flow exceeds 75 percent of the wastewater treatment plant capacity; and a suggestion to include properties with a septic tank in the Master Plan. E. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Pro Tem Suckley adjourned this meeting at 2:34 p.m. City of Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 111912024 1201 Leopard Street {fi City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi,TX 78401 cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Wednesday, December 6,2023 12:00 PM American Bank Center, 1901 N Shoreline Blvd, 2nd Floor Water Garden Room Joint Workshop of the City Council and Planning Commission A. Mayor Paulette Guajardo to call the meeting to order. Mayor Guajardo called the meeting to order at 12:15 p.m. B. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Peter Zanoni, City Attorney Miles Risley and City Secretary Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the Planning Commission was present to conduct the meeting. Present-Michael Budd, Michael M. Miller, Billy A. Lerma, Michael C. York, Brian S. Mandel, Cynthia S. Garza, and Justin Hedrick; Absent-Benjamin Polak, Jahvid R. Motaghi, and Mike A. Munoz Present: 7- Mayor Paulette Guajardo,Council Member Roland Barrera,Council Member Gil Hernandez,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Dan Suckley,Council Member Everett Roy, and Council Member Sylvia Campos Absent: 2- Council Member Mike Pusley, and Council Member Jim Klein C. Introductions and Discussion Guidelines Director of Development Services Al Raymond stated that this workshop will cover the Drainage and Roadway Master Plans, along with the Capital Improvement Plans. D. BRIEFINGS: 1. 23-1969 Land Use, Master Plans, and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for Roadways and Storm Water. Associate Vice President of Pape Dawson Engineers Jake Powell presented information on the following topics: the capital improvement and impact fee process; capital improvement advisory committee (CIAC); land use assumptions; area development plans (ADPs); traffic analysis; land use; ultimate land use-Oso Creek Watershed; drainage overview; drainage funding sources; varied models for varied City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes December 6,2023 conditions; stormwater overview; identifying PMAs; Oso Creek 10 year; Oso Creek 100 year; storm surge; project types; comprehensive master plan; developed areas; project costs-developed area; recommendations for growth (Oso Creek); project Oso 1 (growth); project Oso 2 (growth); project Oso 3 (growth); project Oso 4 (growth); project Oso 5 (growth); and project costs (growth). Council Members, Planning Commission, City Manager Zanoni, and Mr. Powell discussed the following topics: the City is looking into using the 2024 bond program to fund storm water; the projects in the Oso Creek watershed have been coordinated with the county; how is Oso Creek being addressed for storm placement; Pape Dawson is considering ten-year storms with one-foot of flooding when looking at non-impact fee developments; the cost model is based on infrastructure for a ten-year storm; project costs do not include ongoing maintenance; the costs include removal of failed infrastructure, adding culverts, excavating channels, and adding storm drain systems; Pape Dawson did not take into consideration any dredging or improvements to Oso Bay; Oso Creek projects have been discussed with Capital Improvements Advisory Committee; Project Oso 1 needs to be fully developed so everything else can move forward; and retention ponds near the airport and in residential areas. Associate Vice President Justin Clark of Pape Dawson Engineers presented information on the following topics: roadway master plan capital improvement plan; service areas; existing roadway inventory; existing roadway inventory; roadway water plan; capital improvement plan; projected new development (10 years); projected vehicle miles (10-year growth); supply and demand from masterplan; roadway master plan; road master project types; roadway master plan revisions; roadway costs; roadway costs comparisons; example roadway project cost sheet; and next steps. Council Members, Planning Commission, City Manager Zanoni, Assistant City Manager Neiman Young, Mr. Clark, and Transportation Planning Director Ron MacDonald of Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) discussed the following topics: City crews are unable to perform construction work at night due to traffic control, noise disturbance, and logistics of equipment; traffic count data is based on an hourly capacity for each street; the roadway master plan includes City owned and TxDOT operated streets; the scope of work for this plan only includes streets within the City limits; a concern that the MPO model is inaccurate; TxDOT roadways are included in the Master Plan; the City is coordinating these road projects with the MPO through TxDOT; the City's growth rate is less than one percent per year; the total Master Plan cost is only for widening and improving traffic counts; the regional parkway can alter the traffic patterns in the City; and this plan and information is required to be updated every five years. E. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Guajardo adjourned this meeting at 2:46 p.m. City of Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 111912024 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street � Corpus Christi,TX 78401 cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday,January 9, 2024 11:30 Nkrpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, 602 N. Staples St., 2nd Floor Board Room (Rm.210) Addendums may be added on Friday. A. Mayor Paulette Guajardo to call the meeting to order. Mayor Guajardo called the meeting to order at 11:33 a.m. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Chip Blackshear, First Presbyterian Church of Corpus Christi. Pastor Chip Blackshear, First Presbyterian Church of Corpus Christi, gave the invocation. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States and to the Texas Flag to be led by Tara Montelongo, Senior at Veterans Memorial High School. Tara Montelongo, Senior at Veterans Memorial High School, led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Texas Flag. D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Peter Zanoni, City Attorney Miles Risley and City Secretary Rebecca Huerta Note: Council Member Pusley arrived at 12:36 p.m. Present: 9- Mayor Paulette Guajardo,Council Member Roland Barrera,Council Member Gil Hernandez,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Mike Pusley,Council Member Dan Suckley,Council Member Everett Roy,Council Member Jim Klein, and Council Member Sylvia Campos E. SECURITY BRIEFING City Secretary Rebecca Huerta provided a security briefing. F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: (ITEMS 1-2) 1. 23-2037 2023 United Way of the Coastal Bend Charitable Campaign Results and City of Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Introduction of incoming CEO/President Stephanie Jordan City Manager Peter Zanoni provided an update on the 2023 United Way of the Coastal Bend Charitable Campaign Results as follows: United Way of the Coastal Bend; 2023 campaign impact; and five-year campaign impact. City Manager Zanoni introduced the incoming United Way CEO/President Stephanie Jordan. Stephanie has been with United Way for five years. 2. 24-0007 38th Annual MLK 2024 Events Calendar Overview, presented by Nikela Pradier, President of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Corpus Christi Alumnae Chapter City Manager Peter Zanoni recognized the 38th Annual MLK Commemorative March on Monday, January 15 at 12:00 p.m. President of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Corpus Christi Alumnae Chapter Nikela Pradier presented information on the 38th Annual 2024 MLK Day of Service Events. G. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Guajardo opened public comment. Shawn Flanagan, 4218 Herndon St., spoke about inappropriate materials for children at public libraries, and Council to be commended for recent library board appointments. Carrie Meyer, 4401 Gulfbreeze Blvd., spoke against the renovation at 4513 Gulfbreeze Blvd. Pat Craig, 5925 Tapestry Dr., thanked Council for appointing her to the Library Board, and spoke about her vision for library use. John Weber, 609 Naples St., expressed concern about new carwashes being built during drought restrictions. Arturo Lima, 317 Peoples St. and Maggie Peacock, 1773 Ennis Joslin Rd., spoke in opposition to desalination. Adam Rios, 7301 Tangled Ridge Court, stated that clear and coherent thoughts will lead to clear and coherent solutions; and advocated for skate parks. Flo East, 1605 Yorktown Blvd., spoke about the 2024 Nueces County Livestock Show on January 20. Day Manley, 6705 Pharaoh Dr., spoke in support of Item 22, the creation of Tax Increment Financing District TIRZ for Barisi Village. Nick Colosi, 13561 Camino De Plata Court, spoke in support of Item 16, the Riley P. City of Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Dog Park. Jonathan Martinez, 5745 Skylark, encourages banning smoking of all kinds in all City parks. Rachel Caballero, 522 Hancock Ave., expressed concern about the regional effects of the chemical spill in the Port of Victoria, and spoke in opposition to desalination. Shirin Delsooz, 6030 Tapestry St., spoke about implementing protected bike paths similar to Austin, Texas. Julie Rogers, 710 Furman Ave., expressed concern about shelter for unhoused neighbors in the community, and freedom of speech for library patrons. Lydia Ponce, 837 1-2 Milwood Ave., spoke in opposition to desalination. The following citizen submitted a written public comment which is attached to the minutes: Troy Owens, 543 South Bayberry Place. H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: J. CITY COUNCIL RETURN ITEMS: (ITEMS 3-4) 3. 23-1962 23-1962 Appeal of the Building Standards Board's order to demolish dilapidated/substandard structure located at 1214'/2-20 N. Staples Street owned by Priscilla Tryon Cambric (Appellant presentation limited to 3 minutes) Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 3. Assistant Director of Development Services and Code Enforcement Tracey Cantu presented information on the following topics: Building Standards Board's timeline for 1214 1/2 - 1220 N. Staples St.; drone footage; 1214 1/2 - 1220 N. Staples St. appeal; case history; and 1214 1/2 - 1220 N. Staples St. pictures. Assistant Director Cantu stated that this building is not secure and is a danger to the public. The Appellant has had sufficient time to repair the structure. Matt Manning, counsel for Priscilla Tryon Cambric, asked Council to provide Ms. Tryon Cambric additional time to restore and preserve this building as a historical landmark. Council Members, Assistant Director Cantu, and Mr. Manning discussed the following topics: an engineering report was provided in August 2023 and a partial fence was built; a concern about what is salvageable; the Council's goal is to encourage Code Enforcement to cleanup the City; and public safety issues need to be addressed. City of Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Council Member Roy moved to direct the Appellant to secure the site within 14 days with a six-foot perimeter fence, secure the staircase, and secure all openings, as well as provide a structural engineering report within 60 days, seconded by Mayor Guajardo. The City Council's motion effectively amended the resolution for the BSB appeal. This Resolution was passed as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 033252 4. 23-1919 Ordinance amending the Corpus Christi Code to amend Chapter 49 Streets and Sidewalks and Chapter 53 Traffic regarding requirements for performing work in the public right of way and placement of utilities; providing for properly restoring street surfaces that have been cut for utilities or other tie-ins and providing for penalty; providing for publication. Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 4. Assistant Director of Public Works Renee Couture presented information on the following topics: purpose; history; findings-cuts/patches on new streets; goals; recommendations; and staff recommends to approve ordinance amendments as presented. Council Members, City Manager Peter Zanoni, and Director of Public Works Ernest De La Garza discussed the following topics: a desire to allow appellants to appeal a decision to City Council; utility owners will be primarily impacted with these new regulations; Home Builders Association concerns with sidewalks and driveway permits; this ordinance pertains to existing established subdivisions only; and the purpose of this ordinance is to protect streets. Mayor Guajardo opened public comment. David Loeb, 4771 Ocean Dr., offered context about the existing ordinance and expressed concern with the new ordinance. Alycia Kasperitis, 5325 Yorktown Blvd., expressed concern about out of cost expenses for developers and Home Builders Association. Mayor Guajardo closed public comment. Council Member Hernandez made a motion to amend the Ordinance to add a paragraph in Section 49-40-6 as follows: "if a further denial is given, the appellant may thereafter file a written notice of appeal with the City Council within 5 business days of receipt of the Assistant City Manager's written decision. The appeal will be held at the City Council meeting within 20 business days of receipt of the written appeal", seconded by Council City of Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Member Suckley and passed with the following vote: Council Members Hernandez, Hunter, Klein, Pusley, Roy and Suckley voting "Yes", and Council Members Barrera, Campos, and Mayor Guajardo, voting "No." Council Member Hernandez moved to approve the ordinance as amended, seconded by Council Member Suckley. This Ordinance was passed on first reading as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 5- Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy and Council Member Klein Nay: 4- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hunter and Council Member Campos Abstained: 0 K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 5-17) Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor Guajardo referred to the Consent Agenda. Items 5, 8 and 11 were pulled for individual consideration. Council Member Klein moved to approve the consent agenda with the exception of Items 5, 8 and 11, seconded by Council Member Suckley. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Absent: 1 - Council Member Hunter Abstained: 0 5. 23-2043 Approval of the December 12, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 5. A Council Member suggested that Council Members should limit debate on an action item from ten minutes to three minutes. Council Member Klein moved to approve the minutes, seconded by Council Member Hunter. The Minutes were approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Abstained: 0 Consent-Second Reading Ordinances City of Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 6. 23-1901 Zoning Case No. 1023-03, Steve and Lacey Avalos (District 1). Ordinance rezoning property at or near 10329 Kingsbury Drive from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "RS-TF" Two-Family District; Providing for a penalty not to exceed $2,000 and publication. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval). This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033249 7. 23-1695 Ordinance authorizing execution of Amendment#1 to the co-operative agreement with Vertosoft, LLC, for the renewal of OpenGov pavement management software and the purchase of OpenGov permitting and licensing management software for the Public Works Department through September 30, 2024, with three one-year options and a future auto-renewable term possible, in an amount not to exceed $204,579.60, with a potential amount up to $1,012,844.13 if options are exercised, with FY 2024 funding from the Streets Fund. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033250 8. 23-1898 Ordinance authorizing the creation of a Corpus Christi B Corporation project, which includes the expenditure up to $1,000,000.00 for an agreement with South Texas Military Housing, LP for the construction of a Chief of Naval Air Training Flag Officer quarters at Naval Air Station - Corpus Christi; appropriating $1,000,000 from the unreserved fund balance of the Corpus Christi B Corporation Economic Development fund; and amending the budget. Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 8. A Council Member and Assistant City Manager Heather Hurlbert discussed the following topics: a Council Member's concern that other entities should be utilized to financially support these type of projects; and the South Texas Military Task Force provided the initial work on this project. Council Member Pusley moved to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Hernandez. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy and Council Member Klein Nay: 1 - Council Member Campos Absent: 1 - Council Member Hunter Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 033251 City of Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Consent- Contracts and Procurement 9. 23-1769 Motion authorizing the execution of a five-year service agreement with Alliance Health Resources Mobile Division, of Corpus Christi, Texas, for drug and alcohol testing and occupational medical services for City of Corpus Christi Employees in an amount up to $2,064,816.50, with FY 2024 funding of$327,158.00 from the Other Employee Benefits Fund. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2024-001 Consent- Capital Projects 10. 23-1857 Motion authorizing a construction services contract with Nueces Electric Cooperative (NEC), Texas, to extend and provide electric delivery infrastructure (pole and wires) to the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Sector 2A Cell in an amount not to exceed $104,744.98, located outside city limits, with FY 2024 funding available from Solid Waste capital funds. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2024-002 11. 23-2052 Motion awarding a facilities multiple award construction contract to Barcom Construction, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas, in a not to exceed amount of $1,921,176.00 for the Gas Department Building Upgrades (Phase 2) project, located in Council District 1, with FY 2023 funding available from Gas Capital Fund. Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 11. Council Members, City Manager Peter Zanoni, and Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds discussed the following topic: a request that staff provide procedures to Council for contracts that do not go through a procurement process for unforeseen circumstances. Council Member Pusley moved to approve the motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Absent: 1 - Council Member Hunter Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2024-003 City of Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 General Consent Items Consent-First Reading Ordinances 12. 23-1927 Ordinance authorizing the purchase of one additional response boat in the amount of$81,228.78 from Boat Right Marine for the Corpus Christi Fire Department to be funded by the FY 2023 Texas Ambulance Supplemental Payment Program revenue; and appropriating $200,054.01 from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; and amending the FY 2024 Operating Budget by increasing expenditures in the Fire Department General Fund by $200,054.01. This Ordinance was passed on first reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033253 13. 23-2005 Ordinance appropriating $20,000.00 from the unreserved fund balance of the Municipal Court Security Fund for courtroom security upgrades; and amending the FY 2024 operating budget. This Ordinance was passed on first reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033254 14. 23-1904 Ordinance authorizing acceptance and future amendments of Medical Reserve Corps Grant for$47,242.00 from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS); and appropriating $47,242.00 in the Health Grant Fund to provide support to Medical Reserve Corps units until May 30, 2025. This Ordinance was passed on first reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033257 15. 23-1943 Ordinance approving the amended Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 Project & Financing Plans as approved by the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone Number Three, City of Corpus Christi, Texas on November 28, 2023, which expands eligibility under the Commercial Finish-Out Program. This Ordinance was passed on first reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033262 16. 23-2022 Ordinance authorizing an amendment to the existing lease agreement with Riley P. Dog Park, Inc. for the use of the property located adjacent to the Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant for an additional three-year term with two additional one-year terms. This Ordinance was passed on first reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033255 17. 23-2030 Ordinance authorizing a 30-foot-wide revocable pipeline easement to Houston City of Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Pipe Line Company, LP, to install a natural gas pipeline through the Cefe Valenzuela landfill in support of Solid Waste Department's new renewable energy program, located outside City limits. This Ordinance was passed on first reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 033256 L. RECESS FOR LUNCH Mayor Guajardo recessed the Council meeting for lunch at 1:37 p.m. Executive Session Item 24 was held during the lunch recess. Mayor Guajardo reconvened the meeting at 2:29 p.m. M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEMS 18-19) 18. 23-2010 Zoning Case No. 1123-01, Birdie Waldron LLC (District 4). Ordinance rezoning a property at or near 3409 Waldron Road from the "RS-6" Single-Family District to the "RS-6/SP" Single-Family District with a Special Permit; providing for a penalty not to exceed $2,000 and publication. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval). Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 18. Mayor Guajardo opened the public hearing. There were no questions from the Council or the public. Mayor Guajardo closed the public hearing. Council Member Barrera moved to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 033258 19. 23-2011 Zoning Case No. 1123-02, Gulf-Hudson Holdings and Patsy A Brooks (District 1). Ordinance rezoning a property at or near 8159 Stillwell Lane from the "FR" Farm Rural District and the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "R-MH" Manufactured Home District; providing for a penalty not to exceed $2,000 and publication. (Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval). Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 19. Mayor Guajardo opened the public hearing. City of Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Jorge Fernandez, 8233 Leopard St., spoke in support of this rezoning for affordable housing. Mayor Guajardo closed the public hearing. Council Members and Planning Manager of Development Services Andrew Dimas discussed the following topics: the protection boundaries for this subdivision include buffer yards and maximum densities; and a Council Member's concern about the location of this property being in close proximity to industry. Council Member Roy moved to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley and Council Member Roy Nay: 2- Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 033259 N. INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION ITEMS: (ITEMS 20-22) 20. 23-1913 Ordinance authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with MPM Development, L.P. to reimburse the developer an amount not to exceed $1,118,463.05 for the construction of a section of Oso Parkway related to the Oso Creek Corner subdivision located off Yorktown Boulevard and southeast of Starry Road; and amending the operating budget by transferring $896,527.00 from the Public Works - Streets Fund (No. 1041) and $221,936.05 from the Public Works - Storm Water Fund (No. 4300) to the Development Services Fund (No. 4670). (District 5). Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 20. Mayor Guajardo opened public comment. There were no questions from the Council or the public. Mayor Guajardo closed public comment. Council Member Barrera moved to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Suckley. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos City of Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 033260 21. 23-2058 Ordinance authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with Braselton Development Company, Ltd. to reimburse the developer an amount not to exceed $209,485.00 for the construction of stormwater infrastructure improvements related to the Saratoga Downs, Unit 4B subdivision located at the intersection of Lands Drive and Martin Street; and amending the operating budget by transferring and appropriating $209,485.00 from the Public Works - Storm Water Fund (No. 4300) to the Development Services Fund (No. 4670). (District 3). Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 21. Mayor Guajardo opened public comment. There were no questions from the Council or the public. Mayor Guajardo closed public comment. Council Member Barrera moved to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Hernandez. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy and Council Member Campos Nay: 1 - Council Member Klein Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 033261 22. 23-2062 Ordinance designating 127.72 acres within the jurisdiction of the City of Corpus Christi as a Tax Increment Financing District to be known as "Reinvestment Zone Number Six, City of Corpus Christi, Texas" pursuant to petition by owners of Barisi Village properties; setting a maximum City financial participation of and a maximum City contribution of$32,000,000; and establishing a Board of Directors for the Reinvestment Zone. Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 22. Council Members and Assistant City Manager Heather Hurlbert discussed the following topics: the City is waiting on commitment from Del Mar College or Nueces County in order to move forward with the second reading of this Ordinance; and this first reading does not expire. Council Member Suckley moved to amend the ordinance to state that the first reading City of Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 ordinance will expire after 90 days if no action is taken by another taxing entity, seconded by Council Member Pusley and passed unanimously. Mayor Guajardo opened public comment. Steve Moody, 6717 Pharaoh Dr., stated that the developer ensured him that finances are not an issue. Jeff Rollins, McKinney, TX, asked for clarity about what is being voted on. Mayor Guajardo closed public comment. Council Member Suckley moved to approve the ordinance as amended, seconded by Council Member Pusley. This Ordinance was passed on first reading as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Guajardo, Council Member Barrera, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Pusley, Council Member Suckley, Council Member Roy, Council Member Klein and Council Member Campos Abstained: 0 O. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 23) 23. 24-0008 Briefing on Changes to the Nueces County Appraisal District Mayor Guajardo referred to Item 23. Director of Intergovernmental Relations Ryan Skrobarczyk presented information on the following topics: Texas Legislature requires changes; current appointed Nueces County Appraisal District (NCAD) board of directors; 3 new publicly elected directors; 5 new appointed directors; 2024 deadlines for process with new appointed directors; estimate 2024 City of Corpus Christi vote entitlement; ranked list of eligible entities; Tax Assessor-Collector to become voting member; alter the total number of directors; and changes to the Nueces County Appraisal District under SB 2. A Council Member and Director Skrobarczyk discussed the following topic: a Council Member agrees that adding three new publicly elected directors is a good idea. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEM 24) Mayor Guajardo referred to Executive Session Item 24. The Council went into Executive Session at 1:37 p.m. The Council returned from Executive Session at 2:29 p.m. 24. 23-2019 Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning industries, infrastructure, utilities, and property in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, services thereto, industrial district agreements, and City of Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 111912024 City Council Meeting Minutes January 9,2024 Chapters 42, 43 and 212 of the Texas Local Government Code and Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss and deliberate regarding potential financial or other incentive(s) to business prospects(s) that the governmental body seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City will be conducting economic development negotiations This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. Q. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Guajardo adjourned this meeting at 4:15 p.m. City of Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 111912024 From: Norma Duran To: Stephanie Box;Sarah Brunkenhoefer Subject: FW: Public Input:01-09-2024-Troy Owens Date: Tuesday,January 9,2024 7:59:15 AM Attached is the written public comment. From:Jotform<noreply@jotform.com> Sent: Monday,January 8, 2024 10:03 PM To: CitySecretary<CitySecretary@cctexas.com>; Norma Duran <NormaD2@cctexas.com> Subject: Public Input: 01-09-2024 -Troy Owens [ [ WARNING: External e-mail. Avoid clicking on links or attachments. We will NEVER ask for a password, username, payment or to take action from an email. When in doubt, please forward to SecurityAlert@cctexas.com. ] ] U Public Comment& Input Form Date of Meeting 01-09-2024 Name Troy Owens Address Street Address: 543 South Bayberry Place City: Corpus Christi State/Province: TX Postal/Zip Code: 78418 Topic rezoning case 1123-01 INFOR case no. ZN8033 Agenda Item Number 1123-01 Describe Feedback: Our home, 543 South Bayberry Place, backs up to the Property up for rezoning. We have been in our house for 18 years and loved our neighborhood because it is a quiet neighborhood. Our street is mainly traveled by our residents. Bringing in a business will mean several negative changes. As far as I can see, only one positive change. *The Positive-our community needs a local gym (Freedom Fitness going in) *Negative 1. No Privacy-There is no fence around the current property. We have a chain-link fence around our property and some or our neighbors also have chain-link.The increase in people in the area exposes our properties to stranger danger for our kids, Theft, peeping toms. 2. Safety- increase in crime due to exposure 24hours a day 3. Traffic-Waldron Rd is only 2 lanes. No shoulder. No turning lane. That will mean more traffic accidents. 4. Noise-increased traffic noise, music, and car doors slamming. Our bedrooms are close by. Provide an email to receive howens49.ho@gmail.com a copy of your submission. Resolution suspending the Building Standards Board's orders to demolish the dilapidated/substandard structure located at 1214%-20 N. Staples St, owned by Priscilla Tryon Cambric. Whereas, the Building Standards Board (the "Board") held a public hearing on September 28, 2023, at 1:30 pm regarding substandard structures located at 1214 '/2-20 N. Staples St and after making certain findings ordered the structure or premises be removed or demolished by the owner, lien holder or mortgagee, within thirty (30) days pursuant to the attached Final Order of the Building Standards Board Case No. V184239-071222; Whereas, Priscilla Tryon Cambric, the owner of the structure at 1214 '/2-20 N. Staples St, (the "Appellant"), filed a written notice of appeal of the Board's order with the City Secretary's Office on October 24, 2023, in accordance with Section 13-24 (a) City of Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances (the "Code") and Article VI, Section 2 of the City Charter (the "Charter"); Whereas, the filing of the appeals stayed the Board's orders; Whereas, Section 13-24(a) of the Code and Article VI, Section 2 of the Charter authorize the City Council to hear Appeals of the Board's decision; therefore, this Council properly has jurisdiction over these appeals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The Council declares the recitals in the above paragraphs are true and correct. SECTION 2. The Final Order of the Building Standards Board of Appeals, Case No. No. V184239-071222, for 1214 '/2-20 N. Staples St, is suspended conditioned on property owner compliance with the following conditions: (1)securing the building within 14 calendar days, starting January 10, 2024 and ending January 24, 2024. Securing the building includes erecting a 6-foot foot-high perimeter fence that completely encloses the building, with such an enclosed fenced area including the sidewalk directly adjacent to the building. Proper City permits must be obtained for a perimeter fence, including right-of-way permits. Securing the building includes boarding doors and windows on the first floor, including the stairwell to the second floor; and (2) provide the City with a structural engineering report within 60 calendar days, starting January 10, 2024, and ending March 10, 2024. The Final Order will become effective at such time as the Owner fails to comply with either of the aforementioned conditions. SECTION 3. This decision of the City may be personally delivered to the owner, mailed to the owner by first class mail with certified return receipt requested, or delivered to the owner by the United States Postal Service using signature confirmation service. SECTION 4. The City may vacate, secure, remove, or demolish the buildings and/or relocate the building occupants following 30 days after notifying the property owner of the failure to comply with the condition of the suspension in Section 2. PASSED and APPROVED on the day of , 2024. ATTEST: Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary SC G� O1k F AGENDA MEMORANDUM NggpqRpY�' Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2024 xss2 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 30, 2024 DATE: January 10, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Al Raymond, Development Services Department Alraymond@cctexas.com (361) 826-3275 Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and Roadway Masterplans, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvement Plans CAPTION: Ordinance adopting Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans relating to the possible future adoption of water, wastewater, stormwater, and roadway impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction; and amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by adopting related Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, Stormwater Master Plan, and Roadway Master Plan. SUMMARY: This item is adopting Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and Roadway Master Plans, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvement Plans relating to the possible future adoption of water, wastewater, stormwater, and roadway impact fees. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On August 13, 2019, the City Council directed Development Services to investigate alternatives to funding the City's infrastructure needs, re-examine the Trust Funds, and provide recommendations on industry best practices. Development Services utilized the next 18 months to meet with the Trust Fund creators and development stakeholders. We then engaged a third-party consultant previously contracted by the City in 2006 to study alternatives to utilizing the Trust Fund method to extend infrastructure. We asked for an update of their 2006 report. The consultant recommended transitioning to Impact Fees, like other cities our size, in 2006, and their recommendation remained the same in 2020. After a thorough Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process, on March 4, 2021 , the City of Corpus Christi executed a contract with Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. to prepare comprehensive Master Plans for our Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and Roadways infrastructure and to develop Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) needed to accommodate growth over the next ten (10) years. Additionally, Pape-Dawson was asked to conduct an Impact Fee Study based on the Master Plans and the CIP projects. In keeping with the requirements dictated by Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395, on August 10, 2021 , the City Council established the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC), which the City Council and the City Manager appointed 15 members to serve on this committee. Chapter 395 requires 40% of the committee members to be from the development sector, such as Builders, Architects, Contractors, Engineers, Developers, etc. Since the creation of this group, there has been in-depth communication and engagement, including Introduction to CIAC briefings, Impact Fee 101 discussions, Land Use and Area Development Plan reviews, Master Plan reviews, and Committee Workshop sessions. The CIAC team met for 23 meetings; an additional three (3) meetings are scheduled in 2024. In addition to the CIAC meetings, Pape- Dawson and the Operating Departments have met 12 times over the last 18 months to assess the current master plans, review the current Infrastructure Design Manual, review the existing Operation and Maintenance Program for the City's infrastructure and review and evaluate the existing Capital Improvement Projects identified for the City's aging infrastructure. Public Works Traffic Engineering and Stormwater and Corpus Christi Water (CCW) worked diligently with Pape-Dawson to thoroughly vet all the existing data and information to develop the comprehensive Master Plans and the supporting documentation presented before you today. Development Services, along with Public Works and CCW, have collectively conducted Community Meetings within each district; engaged CBHBA and AGC; presented at the Corpus Christi Infrastructure Committee; and made presentations at the monthly Development Taskforce Meetings, all in an effort to inform our citizenry. Additionally, Development Services created a website specifically for this project, "Developing our Future Corpus Christi" Corpus Christi: Developing Our Future (developing-our-future- cc.com), and have placed our messaging on billboards, in local magazines, at sporting events, and on a few TV spots. Corpus Christi is growing, be it slowly, yet growth still needs to be accounted for now and over the next 10 years. The Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and Roadway Master Plans, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvement Plans provide a methodology and process for the City to grow responsibly, which benefits everyone. ALTERNATIVES: None. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Capital Improvement Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and Staff recommend approval of the Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and Roadway Master Plans, which include Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvement Plans LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Water Master Plan Master Plan Wastewater Master Plan Master Plan, Stormwater Master Plan Master Plan Roadway Master Plan Master Plan Presentation Ordinance adopting Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans relating to the possible future adoption of water, wastewater, stormwater, and roadway impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction; and amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by adopting related Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, Stormwater Master Plan, and Roadway Master Plan. WHEREAS, the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans were developed in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council in compliance with all legal requisites, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard regarding the proposed Land Use Assumptions and the Capital Improvements Plans; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard regarding the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan ("Plan CC")-, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan ("Plan CC")-, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that amending the Transportation Plan, Water Master Plan, and Wastewater Master Plan and adopting the Stormwater Master Plan would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience, and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The findings and recitations set out in the preambles to this Ordinance are found to be true and correct, and they are hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. It is officially found, determined, and declared that Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans were developed, approved, and adopted in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. SECTION 2. The Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) relating to the possible future adoption of water impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction is hereby approved and adopted as shown in Exhibit A. A copy of the Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) is on file with the Office of the City Secretary, incorporated hereto as Exhibit A, and publicly accessible via https://corpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12588591&GUID=865198E7- BAE2-44B8-893B-7C92DD0909BA . SECTION 3. The Corpus Christi Water Master Plan, an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan, is amended as shown in Exhibit A. To the extent the amendments made by this section represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to this section. SECTION 4. The Wastewater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) relating to the possible future adoption of wastewater impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction is hereby approved and adopted as shown in Exhibit B. A copy of the Wastewater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) is on file with the Office of the City Secretary, incorporated hereto as Exhibit B, and publicly accessible via https://corpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12588593&GUID=7E31 B266- 388E-41301-B220-60FC1 FDF2167 . SECTION 5. The Corpus Christi Wastewater Master Plan, an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan, is amended as shown in Exhibit B. To the extent the amendments made by this section represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to this section. SECTION 6. The Stormwater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (October 2023) relating to the possible future adoption of stormwater impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction is hereby approved and adopted as shown in Exhibit C. A copy of the Stormwater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (October 2023) is on file with the Office of the City Secretary, incorporated hereto as Exhibit C, and publicly accessible via https://corpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12588594&GUID=1 F917EE8- E7A3-43AA-89AA-7FE9EE38A09A . SECTION 7. The Corpus Christi Stormwater Master Plan, an element of Plan CC Comprehensive Plan, is amended as shown in Exhibit C. To the extent the amendments made by this section represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to this section. SECTION 8. The Roadway Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) relating to the possible future adoption of roadway impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi is hereby approved and adopted as shown in Exhibit D. A copy of the Roadway Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) is on file with the Office of the City Secretary, incorporated hereto as Exhibit D, and publicly accessible via https://corpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12588592&GUID=334EECF6- 11 A3-422F-973F-8COD242A9340 . SECTION 9. The Corpus Christi Transportation Master Plan ("MobilityCC"), an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan, is amended as shown in Exhibit D. Exhibit D does not include streets, roads, or other public improvements in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Streets, roads, and other public improvements in the ETJ remain as previously adopted by the prior Transportation Master Plan. To the extent the amendments made by this section within the City limits represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to this section. This section does not amend the ADA Master Plan or HikeBikeCC. SECTION 10. If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 11. This ordinance shall become effective upon passage hereof. Introduced and voted on the day of , 2024. PASSED and APPROVED on the day of , 2024. ATTEST: Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary Exhibit A — Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) httpsWcorpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&I D=12588591&GU I D=865198E7- BAE2-44B8-893B-7C92DD0909BA Exhibit B - Wastewater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) httPsWcorpuschristi.leg istar.com/View.ashx?M=F&1D=12588593&GU I D=7E316266- 388E-4B01-B220-60FC1 FDF2167 Exhibit C - Stormwater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (October 2023) https://corpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12588594&GUID=1 F917EE8- E 7A3-43AA-89AA-7FE9E E 38A09A Exhibit D - Roadway Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan (September 2023) https://corpuschristi.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12588592&GUID=3341 ECF6- 11 A3-422F-973F-8COD242A9340 Capital ImprovementCommittee Ordinance adopting Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans relating to the possible future adoption of water, wastewater, stormwater, and roadway impact fees for the City of Corpus Christi and its extraterritorial jurisdiction; and amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by adopting related Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, Stormwater Master Plan, and Roadway Master Plan. January 23, 2024 How We Got Here... ❑ On August 13, 2019, City Council directed Development Services Department (DSD) to investigate alternatives to funding the City's infrastructure needs; re-examine the benefits of Trust Funds; and provide recommendations on industry best practices. ❑ DSD utilized the next 18 months meeting with the Trust Fund creators; meeting with builder/developer stakeholders; and engaged a third-party consultant (Duncan Associates), contracted by the City in 2006 to study alternatives to utilizing the Trust Funds, and DSD asked for an update of their 2006 report. The report recommended transitioning from Trust Funds to Impact Fees, like other cities our size, in 2006, and in 2020, their recommendation remained the same. ❑After a thorough Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process, on March 04, 2021, the City of Corpus Christi executed a contract with Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395Financing Capital Improvements required by new development in municipalities, counties and certain other local governments 1. Moses Mostaghasi - Chairman 2. Coretta Graham -Vice Chairman Real estate, 3. Tricia Aitken Development,Building 4. Bart Braselton Required By not less than All Others State Law 40% 5. Rudy Garza Jr. 60% 6. Hailey Gonzalez 7. Jonathan Gonzalez 8. Alex Harris 9. JJ Hart 10. Eli McKay 11. Ramiro Munoz All Others Actual 12. Melody Nixon-Bice 47% Committee 13. Chad Skrobarczyk Make-Up 14. Trey Summers 15. Velda Tamez Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) Tally Land Use Assumptions Land Use Assumptions The Vote: All Aye. Water Master Plan Water Master Plan & Capital Improvement Plan CIP Costs — —1 / The Vote: All Aye. Roadway Master Plan The Roll Call vote: Aye: (9) Nay: (3) Roadway Master Plan & Roadway Capital Improvement Plan Stormwater Master Plan The Roll Call Vote: Aye: (10) Nay: (2) CIP Costs Stormwater Master Plan & Capital Improvement Plan The Vote: All Aye. (12) Wastewater Master Plan Waste Water Master Plan &Capital Improvement Plan CIP Costs The vote: All Aye. Water Master Plan & Associated - Capital Improvements Improvement Category Sum of All Water Service Areas Roadway Master Plan & Associate�] Near Term(0-5 years) $1,083,414,268 CIL Capital Improvements Plan 10-Year $755,558,279 Q Improvement Category Sum of All Roadway SprvicP,A,Fea, s Ultimate $0 Near-Term Improvements Funded by bonds Total $1,838,972,547 10-Year $630,460,491 1. Projects on City's current CIP includes desalination facility and city-wide pipe repair and replacement 2. Projects include second desalination facility,expansion of ON Stevens and distribution system improvements Ultimate $935,645,010 Total $1,566,105,500 Wastewater Master Plan & Associated Capital Improvements Plan Stormwater Master Plan & Associated The estimated cost of implementing all proposed projects areas follows: Near Term Improvements-93 Projects@$267M,10 Year Improvements-23 Projects@$227M Capital • • and Ultimate Improvements-144 Projects @$438M. Sum of All Wastewater Service Areas Sum of All Stormwater Service Areas Near Term(0-5 Years) $266,828,800 Developed Areas $553,421,937 10-Year $226,692,000 Q Oso Creek $143,573,415 Ultimate $437,786,200 Q Total $696,995,352 Total $931,307,000 1. Projects include com pliance with EPA Consent Decree 2. Projects include EPA Consent Decree and growth-related collection and plant improvements 3. Projects include providing collection and treatmentfor complete buildout. Capital • • Advisory Committee (CIAC) Recommends Approval of the Land Use Assumptions; Capital Improvement Plans; and the Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and Roadway Master Plans City of Corpus Christi Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan September 2023 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................1-1 1.1. General Overview ......................................................................................................................1-1 1.2. Outline of Scope.........................................................................................................................1-2 1.2.1. Land Use Assumptions Update..........................................................................................1-2 1.2.2. Collect and Review of Existing Data...................................................................................1-2 1.2.3. Flow and Usage Development...........................................................................................1-3 1.2.4. Water Supply Strategies and Evaluation............................................................................1-3 1.2.5. Existing System Review......................................................................................................1-3 1.2.6. Future Flows and Project Prioritization .............................................................................1-4 1.2.7. Water Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation...........................................................................1-4 1.2.8. Water Pump Station and Storage Tank Evaluation............................................................1-5 1.2.9. Capital Improvement and Master Plan development. ......................................................1-5 1.3. Capital Improvement Advisory Council......................................................................................1-6 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.................................................................. 2.1. Water Assets..............................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1. Water Sources....................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1.1. Choke Canyon Reservoir............................................................................................2-1 2.1.1.2. Lake Corpus Christi.....................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1.3. Lake Texana................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1.4. Colorado River............................................................................................................2-2 2.1.2. Water treatment plant.......................................................................................................2-2 2.1.3. Storage Tanks.....................................................................................................................2-2 2.1.4. Distribution System............................................................................................................2-2 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ..........................................................................3-1 3.1. Area Development Plans............................................................................................................3-1 3.2. Projected Growth Rate ..............................................................................................................3-2 i CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 3.3. Land Use.....................................................................................................................................3-6 4. WATER FLOWS...........................................................................................4-1 4.1. Master Plan methodology..........................................................................................................4-1 4.2. Existing Water Flows..................................................................................................................4-1 4.3. Future Flows...............................................................................................................................4-1 5. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION....................................................................5-1 6. COST FACTORS...........................................................................................6-1 7. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS......................................................................... 7-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Projected Annual Growth by households..................................................................................3-2 Table 3-2 Projected Annual Growth by Employees...................................................................................3-3 Table 3-3 MPO Annual Growth Rate vs. Annual Growth Rate by Lot Additioins.......................................3-3 Table 3-4 Historic Growth Rate by ADP.....................................................................................................3-4 Table 3-5 Growth Rates Reviewed and Selected.......................................................................................3-5 Table 3-6 Projected 10-Year Commercial and Residental Growth by ADP...............................................3-6 Table4-1. Water Demands........................................................................................................................4-1 Table 7-1 Near Term Improvements..........................................................................................................7-1 Table 7-2 10-Year Improvements ..............................................................................................................7-2 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. ii CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 1. INTRODUCTION Corpus Christi Water (CCW) is responsible for the maintenance, operation, management, and expansion of water treatment and distribution for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (City) and surrounding areas and it the water provider for a large surrounding region. Water distribution within the City and surrounding region must meet local, state, and federal regulatory requirements and the reasonable expectations of the public for a healthy, safe, and thriving community. This Water System Master Plan is an overarching planning document intended to guide policy on maintenance, improvement, and expansion of water services through a foreseeable planning horizon (ten years), and for the long term beyond the initial horizon. This plan sets forth identified areas where repair, replacement or upgrades of existing infrastructure are recommended to maintain service at acceptable levels and where upgraded and new infrastructure may be required to support ongoing growth and development. Proposed capital improvement, repair, and upgrade projects are recommended and general cost data is provided. The water system was evaluated by Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. (LAN) as a sub-consultant to Pape Dawson Engineers. Information provide herein is based on LAN's review, analysis, and recommendations. 1.1. General Overview On February 9, 2021,the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, by Resolution 032350, approved Pape- Dawson Engineers to develop Master Planning and Impact Fee Studies for water,wastewater,stormwater and transportation. This Water System Master Plan has been developed in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Title 12, Planning and Development, Subtitle C, Planning and Development Provisions Applying to More Than One Type of Local Government, Chapter 395 — Financing Capital Improvements Required by New Development in Municipalities,Counties,and Certain other Local Governments(Chapter 395). In addition, existing local codes and regulations including the City's Infrastructure Design Manual (IDM), Unified Development Code (UDC); minimum standards set forth by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and other relevant state and federal codes and regulations were considered in providing development, upgrade, and maintenance recommendations. Existing system conditions, The City's Comprehensive Plan,Area Development Plans, current and past Master Plans, Master Plan amendments, 1-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan existing studies, billing information, usage and flow data, and land use information have been collected, reviewed, and assessed to develop planning and development guidance through a ten-year planning period and an ultimate buildout condition. This Master Plan meets the requirements of Chapter 395 for use in evaluating impacts related to development and identified projects and related costs are apportioned for maintenance and improvement of existing service separately from projects and costs related to new development. Where projects address both current needs and development costs are apportioned accordingly. 1.2. Outline of Scope Development of this comprehensive master plan for the City Corpus Christi Water System was accomplished through a series of tasks as outlined below: 1.2.1. Land Use Assumptions Update Updated Land Use Assumptions (LUAs) are necessary to accurately assess current and future water system demand and infrastructure needs. Comprehensive master plans, Area Development Plans, platting and building permit history, along with adopted current and future Land Uses from the City were reviewed to provide updated LUAs. Land use assumptions are based on past and present development patterns, current and projected land use, current and projected zoning, projected population growth and patterns, and input from city Staff and the community. 1.2.2. Collect and Review of Existing Data Data and documents reviewed in conjunction with the development of this Master Plan include, but are not limited to: • City of Corpus Christi water network GIS files. • Existing Water Master Plan • Information on Elevated Storage Tanks. • Water flow records (Monitoring, Water Treatment Plant (WTP)volumes. • Water system plans (as-built drawings, record drawings, construction plans), including plans for currently proposed projects. • Water Certificate of Convenience and Necessity(CNN) boundaries. • City bid tabulations for water projects for the last 5 years. 1-2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan • Existing design standards and operation procedures. • Hydraulic modeling provided by the City's Consultant CP&Y. 1.2.3. Flow and Usage Development The City recently completed a review of its elevated storage tanks. According to CP&Y (the City's elevated storage review consultant), the average daily flow within the model increases from 62 MGD (year 2011) to 82.5 MGD in Year 2025. Using the land uses determined in II, Consultant will compare water data within the City's existing 2011-2025 model for consistency with the land use plan. Consultant shall also review the preliminary raw water mater plan information being completed by others for consistency in projections through the planning period In addition, Consultant will develop flows for the planning period (beyond year 2025) for incorporation back into the water model, further described in Section Prioritization of this task. The objective of this task is to conform the 10-year flow assumptions for use across all water system components (raw water, treatment, and distribution). a reasonable assessment of the inflow and infiltration component. 1.2.4. Water Supply Strategies and Evaluation Raw water supply strategies being developed by others were reviewed to identify key information required for incorporation into the impact fee analysis. Implementations of any recommendations from previous evaluations, remaining recommendations for the previous evaluations and ability for the existing water system to supply current, 5-year and 10-year planned flows and recommended improvements will be evaluated in terms of growth versus retrofit and maintenance-related improvements. As this plan is focused near-term (0-3 years), mid-term (3-7 years) and long-term (7-10 years)flows, excluded from this scope are evaluations long-term (>10 year) alternative water supply strategies. 1.2.5. Existing System Review CP&Y has completed an existing system review as part of their elevated storage report. This report included recommendations for a renewed Pipe Reinvestment Program. This program would replace pipes at the end of their useful life or adversely affected by the new elevated storage tanks. It is Consultant's understanding that the existing distribution system has been adequately evaluated for piping needs as part of CP&Y's efforts. 1-3 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan There are current projects identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan that will need to be evaluated to determine the portion associated with maintenance-related versus growth-related costs. These include: • Citywide Water Distribution System Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program • San Patricio Municipal Water District Transmission Main Connection • Yorktown Boulevard Water Line Extension • Water Line Replacement Program • Elevated Water Storage Tanks- Citywide 1.2.6. Future Flows and Project Prioritization The existing model developed as part of CP&Y's efforts included a planning period through 2025. Modifications necessary to conform the distribution system projected flows past year 2025 for were developed as part of this planning effort to provide ten-year and ultimate buildout projections. CP&Y completed the post-2025 modelling efforts under direction from the City. Regular communication and meetings with CP&Y were completed to coordinate the model imputes and results. 1.2.7. Water Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Conditions and capacity of the Stevens Water Treatment Plant were completed and included: • Review of previous evaluations prepared within the last five years. Using information provided by the city and determine which, if any, of the recommendations from the previous evaluations have been implemented and which recommendations are remaining. Using this existing information, evaluate if existing facilities have the capacity to meet projected 5-year and 10- year flow demands. Provide a list of recommended improvements to meet flow demands. The focus of this evaluation will be only on high-level unit processes. \ • Visiting the WTP site to observe major unit processes and meeting with WTP staff to review data collected and discuss history of plant operations, confirm/clarify observations, and obtain information on current operations and identified needs. • Evaluate current projects identified in the City's and the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) Region N capital improvement plans to determine the portion associated with maintenance-related versus growth-related costs These include and are limited to: 1-4 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan o ONSWTP High Service Building No. 3. o ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and Chemical Facilities Improvements. o ONSWTP On-Site Hypochlorite Generation. o ONSWTP Solids Handling and Disposal Facilities. o ONSWTP Site Infrastructure Improvements. o ONSWTP Sedimentation Basin Improvements. o ONSWTP Clearwell No. 3. o ONSWTP Filtration System Hydraulic Improvements 1.2.8. Water Pump Station and Storage Tank Evaluation Condition and capacity of existing pump station and storage tank facilities was completed and included: • Review of previous evaluations prepared within the last five years using information provided by the city. Recommendations from the previous evaluations that have been implemented and those remaining were reviewed to evaluate current capacity and ability to meet projected 10- year flow demands. • A list of recommended improvements to meet flow demands were developed. • Meetings were conducted Operations and Maintenance staff to review data collected and discuss history of pump station operations and maintenance concerns. 1.2.9. Capital Improvement and Master Plan development. The current Capital Improvement Plan was reviewed with the information developed under the previous tasks. Projects that were included in this review are: • Future Transmission Mains (12-inch and up). • Existing and Future Elevated Storage Tanks. • Existing and Future Ground Storage Tanks. • Existing and Future Pump Stations. • Existing and Future Water Treatment Plant Facilities. Citywide Lift Station Repair. These projects and associated projected costs were reviewed to assess the overall impact to the water system and to provide an apportionment of maintenance and service improvement related costs separately from development related costs. 1-5 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan New projects were identified and developed to meet projected water maintenance and service needs for the 10-year horizon and ultimate buildout conditions. Probable costs for identified projects were developed using historic costs data from recent projects in the city, information provided by local construction contractors, and accepted costs estimating methods. This Master Plan was then developed by compiling the information, data, analysis, and results from the various tasks as described. 1.3. Capital Improvement Advisory Council In accordance with Chapter 395,the City established a Capital Improvement Advisory Council (CIAC)that was tasked with overseeing and guiding the development of the Master Plan and the associated Capital Improvement Program. Composition of the CIAC is fifteen members appointed by the City council of which at least six members represent the real estate, development, or building industry. AS noted by the City's description of the CIAC: "The committee shall serve in an advisory capacity; advise and assist the City Council in adopting land use assumptions; review the capital improvements plan, land use assumptions and impact fees, and file written comments in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; monitor and evaluate the implementation of the capital improvements plan; file semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee; and advise the City Council of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee." Members of CIAC were regularly briefed on the development of the Master Plan, provided information as it was developed, and provided input and recommendations. 1-6 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 2. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM A general description of the water treatment, storage and distribution assets is provided as a baseline for planning and proposed development. As maintenance, modification, upgrades, and new development are ongoing activities, conditions as described in this section are general in nature and will change with time. 2.1. Water Assets CCW provided water to the City Corpus Christi and a surrounding seven-county region covering 140 square miles. Serving over 500,000 residents the Corpus Christi Water System comprises four surface water sources,the ON Stevens Water Treatment Plant, 9 water storage tanks, and over 1,700 miles of distribution pipe. 2.1.1. Water Sources Raw water is currently obtained from four surface resources and is then routed to the ON Stevens plant for treatment to potable standards, or distributed, untreated, to bulk use customers. 2.1.1.1. Choke Canyon Reservoir Choke Canyon Reservoir is located on the Frio River approximately 62 miles northwest of Corpus Christi. Covering 25,670 acres the reservoir has a storage capacity of 695,271 acre-feet and water discharges into the Nueces River basin and flows downstream to the ON Stevens Treatment plant. 2.1.1.2. Lake Corpus Christi Lake Corpus Christi is located on the Nueces River approximately 25 miles northwest of Corpus Christi. Covering 19,336 acres this reservoir provides storage of 242,241 acre-feet of water. Water from Lake Corpus Christi flows into the Nueces River and downstream to the ON Stevens Wastewater treatment Plant. 2.1.1.3. Lake Texa na Lake Texana is located on the Navidad River approximately 92 miles northeast of Corpus Christi. Lake Texana and covers 8,611 acres and has a storage capacity of 158,975 acre-feet and approximately 45 percent of the current raw water supply the City comes from this reservoir. Water is pumped to the ON Stevens WTP through the 101 mile long, 64-inch diameter Mary Rhodes pipeline. 2-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 2.1.1.4. Colorado River Water rights on the Colorado River were purchased and an additional 42 miles of pipeline constructed (Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase II)to provide an additional water source. Currently approximately five percent of the water demand is provided from the Colorado River. 2.1.2. Water treatment plant. Potable water for the region is treated at the ON Stevens WTP. Raw water is drawn from the Nueces river and the Mary Rhodes pipeline for treatment to potable standards and distribution throughout the region. 2.1.3. Storage Tanks There is was a separate study completed by CP&Y (now STV)that was not available for independent review but included as projects identified by CCW. 2.1.4. Distribution System The existing system was analyzed for improvements needed to address present-day system issues. For this analysis, the study used the peak hour demand scenario of the City's existing hydraulic model to represent the worst-case scenario. Analysis of the existing system results indicated that except for locations in the vicinity of ESTs or upstream of pump stations,the minimum pressure at all other locations was above 35 psi, satisfying Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements. 2-2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 3. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Demand on public infrastructure is a function of the population, where that population lives and works, and how the land within the service area of the public system is used. Evaluation of the future demands on the Water System related to development requires a reasonable assessment of the increase in population, where and how new development occurs, and changes in land use and population density. Taken together these parameters are referred to as Land Use Assumptions (LUAs). Projections for growth in employees and households are regularly conducted by the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Current projections were used as an initial point in the development of Land Use Assumptions and evaluating future demands on the water system. 3.1. Area Development Plans To improve City-wide planning, zoning, and land use assumptions the City Planning Department has divided the city into nine planning areas (Bayside, Corpus Christi Airport, Downtown, Flour Bluff, London, Northwest, Padre/Mustang Island, Southside, and Westside) and has developed planning documents for each area. These Area Development Plans (ADPs) are based on current and projected land usage and on projected needs based on the character, land use, population, and anticipated development of the individual areas. Projections for each area can be combined to provide overall City- wide Land Use Assumptions. In addition to the ADPs currently in place, a tenth planning area located between the Northwest ADP, the City of Robstown, Texas, and west of Interstate 69 has been identified and used in the master plan development. This tenth planning area is referred to as the Calallen Planning Development Area. Exhibit 9 shows the PDAs used in developing the land use assumptions. Both the London and Calallen planning areas extend into the City's ETJ outside of the City Limits. Development in these areas is occurring and is expected to continue to occur with related annexation of the land and extension of City services. Master planning for extension of water services in these areas is provided like planning within the city limits. Additional development of land in the ETJ is expected to follow the growth patterns of the adjacent ADP and is assumed to follow the established land use patterns. Significant portions of the ETJ are located north of Corpus Christi Bay and Nueces Bay(See Exhibit 10). 3-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan There are no City owned services in these areas and development is not expected to be significant within the planning horizons of this Master Plan. Planning efforts have not been included for areas of the ETJ where costs to extend water services are high and significant development is not expected to occur for an extended period. 3.2. Projected Growth Rate Growth projections are developed and updated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Data from the MPO projections was initially used to calculate a predicted annual growth rate based on increase in households and the projected increase in employees from 2021 to 2031. Project growth rates were calculated using the following equation. i 02031 households/employeeslnumber of years Percent Annual Growth = J — 1 100 2021 households/emplyees As an example, in the Downtown ADP, the number of current households is 3,794. In 2031, it is projected that the number of households in this ADP may be 4,919.This is a difference of 1,124 and correlates to a 2.6 percent growth per year in households. Similar methodology was used for projected increases in employees. Projected annual growth based on households and employees are shown in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2. Table 3-1 Projected Annual Growth by households ADP 2021 2031 2031 Less 2021 Annual Growth Households Households in households Bayside 31,508 32,478 970 0.3% Calallen 1,310 2,201 891 5.3% CC Airport 1,582 2,228 646 3.5% Downtown 3,794 4,919 1,125 2.6% Flour Bluff 8,006 8,573 567 0.7% London 1,100 1,720 620 4.6% Northwest 12,152 15,194 3,042 2.3% Padre/Mustang Island 5,987 7,295 1,308 2.0% Southside 41,601 47,130 5,529 1.3% Westside 18,533 19,978 1,445 0.8% Total 125,573 141,716 16,143 1.2% 3-2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan Table 3-2 Projected Annual Growth by Employees 021 2031 Annual ADP Employees ees Emlo ees 2031 Less 2021 Growth in P y pP y Employees Bayside 25,887 26,342 455 0.2% Calallen 3,502 4,093 591 1.6% CC Airport 8,927 10,755 1,828 1.9% Downtown 17,328 17,450 122 0.1% Flour Bluff 11,725 12,077 352 0.3% London 423 732 309 5.6% Northwest 11,536 13,307 1,771 1.4% Padre/Mustang Island 2,666 3,431 765 2.6% Southside 26,898 30,226 3,328 1.2% Westside 31,253 33,767 2,514 0.8% Total 140,145 152,180 12,035 0.8% According to the US Census Bureau, the City of Corpus Christi had an annual growth rate of 0.4 percent from 2010 to 2020. The data from the MPO projections shows a more robust growth rate is anticipated over the next ten-year period. City records of lots added in each ADP from January 1, 2020, to January 25, 2022, were then used to generate an annual growth rate for the last two years. The MPO baseline number for 2021 households was used in conjunction with the lots added data from the city using the same formula to generate an annual growth rate based on the lot added information. The growth rate from lots added is compared to the MPO Households growth rate in Table 3-3. Table 3-3 MPO Annual Growth Rate vs.Annual Growth Rate by Lot Additioins MPO Annual MPO Annual Average Annual Lot ADP Residential Units Annual Lot Addition Added Growth Rate Addition Growth Rate Bayside 97 0.3% 60 0.2% CaIaIIen 80 5.3% 24 1.8% CC Airport 65 4.1% 0 0.0% Downtown 112 3.0% 5 0.5% Flour Bluff 57 0.7% 112 1.4% London 288 4.6% 225 4.5% Northwest 304 2.5% 71 0.6% Padre/Mustang Island 131 2.2% 36 0.6% Southside 553 1.3% 421 1.0% Westside 145 0.8% 70 0.4% Total 1,832 1.3% 1024 0.8% 3-3 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan In addition, the City provided growth rate information from previous time periods for six of the ADPs, which was included in the overall evaluation of growth rates. Historic growth rate and the associated period are provided in Table 3-4. Table 3-4 Historic Growth Rate by ADP ADP Time Period Growth Trend Bayside 2010-2021 0.15% Calallen No Data CC Airport No Data Downtown No Data Flour Bluff 2010-2019 0.67% London 2000-2018 7.2% Northwest No Data Padre/Mustang Island 2000-2019 2.48% Southside 2000-2018 2.04% Westside 2000-2019 0.36% This information was considered along with the other data discussed to develop a baseline and a reasonable prediction of projected growth. Growth trends were discussed with City Staff and the CIAC, who provided input from the builder, developer, engineering, business, and general citizen communities. Growth rates were adjusted based on the input from the CIC and based on the reviews and the discussions noted, a growth rate for each ADP was selected with the following rational: • Bayside is judged to have minimal growth and there is no current indication this growth rate may increase in the ten-year planning periods. A growth rate of 0.2 percent is used. • Conditions and growth in Calallen are like those in the Northwest ADP and the same growth rate of 1.5 percent is used. • Based on discussions with the CIAC, residential development in the CC Airport ADP may not occur at an appreciable rate during the planning horizon of this Master Plan and no growth (0.0 percent) is used. • The Downtown rates have a broad range; however, there is an ongoing effort to encourage "redevelopment" in the downtown areas, necessitating consideration of a higher growth rate. A rate of 2.0 percent is used. • In the Flour Bluff area,the MPO and City growth rate are similar, but there is an increase in growth occurring recently based on the lot added information. This observation is consistent with recent development activity in the area. A rate of 1.0 percent is used for this area. 3-4 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan • For the London area there is currently strong interest in development, the past observed growth rate as identified by the City is 7.2 percent. After discussions and review with the CIAC, an annual growth rate of 10.6 percent has been applied in this area. • The Northwest area has a significant range in the available data. An average growth rate between the MPO household data and the lot addition data of 1.5 percent is used. • In the Padre/Mustang Island ADP,the MPO growth rate and the City's growth trend are consistent. The growth rate in lot count may be minimal due to the type of growth (i.e., planned use developments). A growth rate of 2.4 percent is used. • The Southside area has experienced a higher rate identified by City data than either the MPO or the added lot count data. Interest in development in this area is strong and a conservative 2.0 percent growth rate has been selected. • The Westside lot count rate and growth trend identified by the City are consistent. A growth rate of 0.4 percent was selected for the Westside. The growth rates developed and considered and the selected growth rates for use as the basis of this Master Plan are shown in Table 3-5. Table 3-5 Growth Rates Reviewed and Selected Annual Annual Annual Lot Historic Selected ADP Growth in Growth in Addition Growth Employees households Growth Rate Rate Growth Rate Bayside 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.15% 0.2% Calallen 1.6% 5.3% 1.8% 1.5% CC Airport 1.9% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% Downtown 0.1% 2.6% 0.5% 2.0% Flour Bluff 0.3% 0.7% 1.4% 0.67% 1.0% London 5.6% 4.6% 4.6% ° 7.2 10.6% Northwest 1.4% 2.3% 0.6% 1.5% Padre/Mustang Island 2.6% 2.0% 0.6% 2.48% 2.4% Southside 1.2% 1.3% 1.0% 2.04% 2.0% Westside 0.8% 0.8% 0.4% 0.36% 0.4% Total 0.9% 1.3% 1.8% 1.5% For commercial development, the growth rates taken from the MPO data are used.Table 3-6 provides the 2021 and 2031 data for residential and commercial growth used for evaluating future water demands and proposed Projects to meet current and future needs. 3-5 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan Table 3-6 Projected 10-Year Commercial and Residental Growth by ADP ADP 2021 2031 2021 2031 Households Households Employees Employees Bayside 31,508 32,144 25,887 26,342 Calallen 13,310 1,520 3,502 4,093 CC Airport 1,585 1,582 8,927 10,755 Downtown 3,794 4,625 17,328 17,450 Flour Bluff 8,006 8,844 11,725 12,077 London 11100 3,000 423 732 Northwest 12,152 14,103 11,536 13,307 Padre/Mustang Island 5,987 7,589 2,666 3,431 Southside 41,601 50,711 26,898 30,226 Westside 18,533 19,288 31,253 33,767 Total 129,485 147,886 142,214 155,164 3.3. Land Use With the annual growth rate for the ADPs selected, the next step is to identify where the anticipated growth may occur to facilitate planning for future water system expansion. Vacant land that could develop withing the planning horizon of the master plan is assessed by comparing the anticipated growth with current land use density and use. For example, residential growth can be assessed in ADPs by determining the overall density and then using the number of projected new households to calculate how much undeveloped land may be impacted by the predicted development. As an example,for residential development, there are 8,006 residences in the Flower Bluff ADP in 2021, the current density across residential land use types is three units per gross acre. The predicted growth by 2031 in households is 567, which equates to 189 acres of currently undeveloped or agricultural land being developed into some type of residential use. Similar evaluations have been conducted in each ADP. Current land use maps and information from ADPs were used to identify currently vacant and agricultural areas within the ADPs and future land use mapping based on current land use zoning and previous master planning efforts have been developed by the City to facilitate practical and efficient 3-6 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan development. The existing and future land use maps were overlayed to identify currently vacant and agricultural land that could be developed, and what the anticipated land use for the area would be. Maps have been prepared for the ADPs identifying currently undeveloped land.The base color of the vacant lands correlate to the zoned land use (see map legends) and the outline color for parcels indicates whether the current land use is vacant (orange outline) or agricultural (green outline). Due to their size,this information is maintained in a shapefile provided to the City. New lot information provided by the City was then reviewed to assess where potential growth would occur and to identify overall growth patterns. For a new development outside of the City limits to have water services, the land must be annexed, and the water collection system extended, so growth outside of the City is assumed to occur adjacent to existing development within the City Limit or to follow patterns like current development and then to move outward into the ETJ. Other development factors, such as properties within the Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) around military air installation and Accident Potential Zones (APZ) around the Corpus Christin international Airport. Such zoning and use restrictions were assumed to delay development and limit the land use density in the associated areas. For developing ten-year projections, development in within areas with land use restrictions was assumed to remain stagnate and no contributions were included for the ten-year flows. It should also be noted that areas within defined 100-year flood zones is anticipated to develop eventually. Based on conversations with the CIAC, development in these areas would be larger lots and water system needs will be minimal. 3-7 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 4. WATER FLOWS 4.1. Master Plan methodology Land use assumptions are used to develop a general prediction of where growth will occur, both in residential and commercial /industrial areas, how fast that growth will occur, and the impact predicted growth patterns will have on the water collection and treatment system. General guidelines have been developed and presented for use in planning and guiding future expansion of the water system.These guidelines are not intended to be prescriptive as to exact location and specific route of future improvements while providing guidance on flows that can be anticipated and how to manage increased flows due to development. To complete the master plan, three source documents were used: • FY 2022-2023 City of Corpus Christi Amended CIP • Texas Water Development Board Coastal Bend (Region N) Regional Water Planning Group 2021 Regional Water Plan • 10-Year Water System Master Plan Recommendations The City had completed a hydraulic model of their distribution system as part of another project. That model was used to identify future needs within the City. 4.2. Existing Water Flows Water demands within the existing City model were not changed. 4.3. Future Flows Future flows were developed and evaluated for a ten-year planning horizon and an ultimate build-out condition.These flows are provided in Table 4-1. Table 4-1.Water Demands Year Projected Maximum Treated Water Demand *(MGD) 2021 107 2031 122 2036+ 137 *Does not include future large volume users or new industries. 4-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan S. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION The Water System Evaluation was completed by LAN.Their evaluation is included as Appendix A. Key summary factors for this report are: • The City hydraulic model for existing conditions did not identify any capacity issues. Therefore, there are no near term distribution system projects required. • Short-range (2022-2023) and long range (2026-2027) projects already planned by the City were included in the model. • There are two 10-year projects recommended to relieve pressure issues. 5-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 6. COST FACTORS Proposed projects have been developed to address the identified capacity constraints that currently exist and that are anticipated based on potential development. To provide a reasonable estimate of cost for the proposed projects cost factors have been developed that can be applied to proposed work to develop a budgetary level estimate of project costs. Estimates of cost are high level and are based on generally accepted construction practices, overall capacity needs, materials, sizes, and depth of various system components and are not based on a specific design. The cost factors for water system improvements are included in Appendix A. 6-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 7. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The capital improvements have been divided into near term, 10-year and ultimate projects. "Near term" are projects that should be completed or and in the process of being completed prior to 2025. 10-Year are projects that aren't immediately needed but should be completed for growth in the next ten years. Ultimate projects are projects defined for the ultimate buildout of the City. Appendix A includes individual costing sheets for each recommended project. Although the amount of development that will occur in the next ten years can be predicted, it is difficult to determine with reasonable accuracy where that growth will occur. Generally, costs were developed for the current project needs and for the ultimate flow conditions project needs. Ten-year costs were then developed by taking a percentage of the ultimate project costs based on predicted growth rates. Based on the breakdown generated using this approach a list of probable ten-year projects has been developed. The City currently has significant capital investment planned to preserve and expand accessibility to raw water. Table 7-1 provides information on projects that have been identified and are currently in progress or are being developed for Near Term Projects. Table 7-1 Near Term Improvements Project Project Year Estimated Cost No. 1 Choke Canyon Dam Infrastructure Improvements 2022 $1,219,533 2 Wesley Seale Dam(Lake Corpus Christi)Instrumentation Rehabilitation 2022 $5,060,000 3 Wesley Seale Dam Dewatering System and Spillway Gate Rehabilitation 2022 $13,440,000 4 Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase I Condition Assessment 2024 $3,381,000 5 Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase I System Improvements 2022 $19,300,000 6 Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 11 System Improvements(Bank Erosion) 2022 $14,895,000 8 Nueces River Raw Water Pump Station Transmission Main 2022 $9,350,000 9 Baffle Wall Improvements 2024 $832,000 10 Electrical Distribution Improvements 2023 $1,250,000 11 Electrical Substation 2023 $8,085,000 12 Flocculation Upgrades and Baffling In Basins 1 and 2 2023 $14,500,000 13 Security Upgrade 2023 $2,750,000 14 Sedimentation Basin Improvements 2023 $18,515,730 15 Site Infrastructure Improvements 2023 $4,567,500 16 Chlorine System Improvements 2023' $54,357,811 2031 7-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan Project Project Year Estimated Cost No. 17 Recycle Pond Improvements 2023, $4,750,000 2025 10-year improvements are provided in Table 7-2. Table 7-2 10-Year Improvements Project Number Project Name Cost Growth% WATER SOURCES' LR 2 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure Study $10,000,000 50% E15117 Seawater Desalination $220,736,326 50% LR 3 Seawater Desalination(City's Second $275,000,000 50% Desalination Facility) WATER TREATMENT2 18131 ONSWTP Clearwell No.3 $17,369,000 24% 19032 ONSWTP Filtration System Hydraulic $20,000,000 24% Improvements E17047 ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and $69,300,000 24% Chemical Facilities Improvements LR 8 ONSWTP Clearwell No.4 $20,000,000 24% 23059 LR 10 ONSWTP Solids Handling&Disposal $43,700,000 24% Facility 26003 LR 11 1 ONSWTP Third Treatment Train $96,000,000 24% 23025 LR 12 ONSWTP Weir Improvements Basins 3 $8,847,000 24% &4 WATER DISTRIBUTION 22144 Flour Bluff 18"Line Extension $8,085,000 100% 21039 Nueces Bay Blvd-Poth Lane Water Line $17,750,000 27% Replacement4 LR 17 Rand Morgan 16"Water Main $5,775,000 100% Extension3 23033 LR 22 Water Line Extension to Padre Islands $44,310,000 50% LR 24 Water System Integration Piping for $25,000,000 50% New Water Plants 'Water Source IFCIP projects include a 50%factor for resilience or redundancy of the existing water supply and a 50%growth factor. 'Water Treatment IFCIP projects have a 24%growth factor representing the capacity increase from 161.5 MGD to 200 MGD. s Flour Bluff Water Line and Rand Morgan Water Main Extensions are 100%growth, extending service to new developments. 4The Nueces Bay Boulevard/ Poth Water line is a 27% upsize over existing capacity for service to new development, and the growth percentage is 27%. 7-2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 'The Padre Island Extension and New Water Plant Piping represent a 50%growth percentage and a 50% resilience factor for existing water service. Beyond the recommended improvements for Year 2031, no additional system deficiencies are identified requiring water system improvements for the ultimate planning year. 7-3 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Water Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan Appendix A.Water Master Plan Technical Report .. �. Texas Registered Engineering Firm No. 2614 Water Master Plan Technical Report City of Corpus Christi I Pape-Dawson Master Planning and Impact Fee Study INTERIM REVIEW ONLY Document incomplete: not intended for permit, bidding, or construction. Engineers: Lisa K. Lattu, Behnaz Khakbaz PE License Numbers: 90205, 143075 Firm: Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. I'M uN.Firm Number: F-2614pDate: 12 Se tember 2023 ° °, YYYYY a YY ai i S d I 9/12/2023 Table of Contents 1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................2 1.1 Scope Assumptions.......................................................................................................................2 2 Flow Usage/ Development...................................................................................................................2 2.1 Land Use and Growth Projections Existing Land Use ...................................................................2 2.2 Raw Water Master Plan................................................................................................................3 2.3 Future Treated Water Flows.........................................................................................................3 3 Water Supply Strategies and Evaluations.............................................................................................3 3.1 Water Supply Master Plan............................................................................................................3 4 Existing System Review.........................................................................................................................4 4.1 Model Setup and Assumptions.....................................................................................................4 4.2 Existing System Demands.............................................................................................................4 4.3 Existing System Currently Planned Projects .................................................................................4 4.4 Existing System Evaluation............................................................................................................5 4.5 Existing System Recommended Improvements ...........................................................................5 5 Future System Review...........................................................................................................................6 5.1 Future System Demands...............................................................................................................6 5.2 Modeled O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Production.........................................................6 5.3 Future System Evaluations............................................................................................................6 5.4 TCEQ Capacity Analysis.................................................................................................................8 5.5 Future System Draft Recommended Improvements....................................................................9 6 Water Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation............................................................................................ 10 6.1 Previous Evaluations................................................................................................................... 10 6.2 Evaluation of Current Processes and Projects............................................................................ 10 7 Water Pump Station and Storage Tanks Evaluation...........................................................................12 8 Water Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan .................................................................................... 12 8.1 Recommended Near-Term Improvements................................................................................. 12 8.2 Recommended 2031 Improvements.......................................................................................... 12 8.3 Recommended Ultimate Improvements.................................................................................... 13 Appendix A 1 Purpose The City of Corpus Christi (City) contracted Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. (Pape-Dawson) for a Master Planning and Impact Fee Study. Pape-Dawson contracted with Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. (LAN) for Water and Wastewater Master Plan Support. This technical memorandum summarizes the Water Master Plan Support including system modeling and Water Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan (IFCIP) development for the water system for the 2031 and ultimate planning years. 1.1 Scope Assumptions • Development of capital improvements associated with new water source(s) is not included in this technical memorandum. • Review of water treatment plant and other facilities is based solely on condition and capacity. • Treatability, bench scale or modeling of water quality performance and water chemistry effects on the distribution system water quality or impacts were excluded. • Costs were developed utilizing the City of Corpus Christi Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Proposed Capital Budget (FY 2023 CIP) and the Texas Water Development Board Coastal Bend Regional Water Planning Area Region N 2021 Regional Water Plan (2021 Region N Water Plan). 2 Flow Usage / Development 2.1 Land Use and Growth Projections Existing Land Use Pape-Dawson provided a technical memorandum dated November 2, 2022, titled City of Corpus Christi Master Plans—Land Use and Population Projections which provides a detailed analysis of future land use in determining growth.Table 2-1: is the final growth rate by area development plan (ADP). Table 2-1.Assumed 10-Year Growth by ADP ADP 2021 2031 Households Households CC Airport 1,582 1,582 Downtown 3,794 4,625 Flour Bluff 8,006 8,844 Bayside 31,508 32,144 Northwest 12,152 14,103 Southside 41,601 50,711 Westside 18,533 19,288 London 1,100 2,205 Calallen 1,310 1,520 Main System Subtotal 119,586 135,022 Padre/Mustang Island 5,987 7,589 TOTAL 125,573 142,611 City of Corpus Christi Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 2 2.2 Raw Water Master Plan For this technical memorandum, the City instructed LAN to use the 2021 Region N Water Plan as the preliminary raw water master plan.The information from that plan is reviewed in the next section,Water Supply Strategies and Evaluations. 2.3 Future Treated Water Flows The City completed a review of its elevated storage tanks within the past two years. As part of that effort, CP&Y, Inc. (CP&Y)1 reported the average daily flow increases from 62 million gallons per day (MGD) in Year 2011 to 82.5 MGD in year 2025 based on the City's water model. Due to the influence of water flows on wastewater loads, Pape-Dawson received the City's current and historical water data to prepare uniform 10-year and ultimate water demands for use with the water and wastewater plans. LAN received these demands as a shapefile with the demands allocated to parcels with planned growth. 3 Water Supply Strategies and Evaluations 3.1 Water Supply Master Plan Upon the City's direction, LAN reviewed the 2021 Region N Water Plan to prepare the preliminary raw water master plan. While the 2026 Region N Water Plan is in preparation by the Regional Water Planning Group,there were no demand or water management strategy updates available for use during the Water Master Plan Development. 3.1.7 dater Supply Strategies The 2021 Region N Water Plan includes potential water supply or water management strategies over a 50-year horizon. The IFCIP considers only those improvements through the Year 2031, so the water management strategies from the 2021 Region N Water Plan beyond 2031 are excluded. The City is included as a potential sponsor for the six projects listed below. • O.N.Stevens Water Treatment Plant Improvements:The City is completing an O.N.Stevens Water Treatment Plant (ONSWTP) master plan with a current list of improvements. LAN reviewed the improvements listed in the 2021 Region N Water Plan,but the City's master plan updates provided the projects utilized in this technical memorandum. • Municipal Conservation: Municipal Conservation is considered as a water demand strategy but is not included as water supply in the IFCIP. • Aquifer Storage and Recovery: The Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) project is included in Appendix A for reference, but not included in the IFCIP.The Regional Planning Group and the City are evaluating this project as part of the 2027 update to the Region N Water Plan. • Inner Harbor and La Quinta Desalination: The City has two desalination projects under consideration for future water supply. These projects update and replace the 2021 Region N Water Plan desalination projects. 1 CP&Y, Inc. is now doing business as STV Group, Inc.(STV) Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 3 • Evangeline/Laguna Treated Groundwater Project:The Evangeline/Laguna Treated Groundwater project is included in Appendix A for reference.The project is included in the 2021 Region N Water Plan as a joint project between the City and the San Patricio Municipal Water District, though it has not been fully vetted or adopted by the City and is under review as part of the 2027 update to the Region N Water Plan. 4 Existing System Review 4.1 Model Setup and Assumptions The City's existing InfoWater Pro hydraulic model (October 2022) was used as the basis for this analysis and provided by CP&Y2. Corpus Christi Water(CCW)requested a model update to include projects already in planning, design,or construction and additional water system improvement projects identified to serve future known developments. Proposed water system improvements were reviewed or developed to meet existing and projected demands with a minimum system pressure of 35 psi. 4.2 Existing System Demands The existing hydraulic model included three steady-state scenarios representing existing Average Day Demand (ADD), Maximum Day Demand (MDD), and Peak Hour Demand (PHD) conditions. Table 4-1 lists the existing system demands. Table 4-1: Existing System Demands Demand Condition GPM MGD Peaking Factor* ADD 59,046 85 1 M D D 74,398 107 1.26 PHD 1 83,325 120 1.41 *Peaking Factor=Demand/ADD 4.3 Existing System Currently Planned Projects The existing water system model update by STV included projects completed within the last five(5)years. Additional project information was provided by the City for analysis of projects currently planned or in early design stages. The City has a Pipe Reinvestment Program to replace pipes at the end of their useful life or adversely affected by the new elevated storage tanks. There were no recent reports or project information for the Pipe Reinvestment Program available for review;those projects are included as budgetary estimates from the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Proposed Capital Budget. z CP&Y, Inc. is now doing business as STV Group, Inc.(STV) Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 14 Specifically Referenced Projects The following were identified in the scope as currently planned projects subject for review and possible inclusion in the water model.The status of the review is addressed for each project. • Citywide Water Distribution System Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program: This was a separate study not available for independent review but included as projects identified by CCW. • San Patricio Municipal Water District Transmission Main Connection: This project is in service. • Yorktown Boulevard Water Line Extension: This project is in service. • Water Line Replacement Program: This was a separate study not available for independent review but included as projects identified by CCW. • Elevated Water Storage Tanks—Citywide: This was a separate study not available for independent review but included as projects identified by CCW. V4 7 Existing Syste Vater Treatment Capacit ONSWTP staff confirmed the plant's current capability to treat 161.5 MGD and projects identified in the ongoing plant master plan expands the treatment capacity to 200 MGD. 4.4 Existing System Evaluation The existing system was analyzed for improvements needed to address present-day system issues. For this analysis, LAN used the PHD scenario in the existing hydraulic model to represent the worst-case scenario. LAN conducted a steady-state PHD analysis to identify possible capacity issues within the existing system. Analysis of the existing system results indicated that except for locations in the vicinity of ESTs or upstream of pump stations,the minimum pressure at all other locations was above 35 psi,satisfying Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ) requirements. 4.4. 1 Model Limitations and Recommendation: The limitations encountered by LAN during this project were: • Lack of demand diurnal patterns in the received model, as all scenarios were steady-state. • The existing system hydraulic model was not calibrated. Due to a lack of demand diurnal patterns, LAN did not evaluate the system storage variation for operational efficiency. A criterion for maximum pipe velocity was not available and should be evaluated with the City's model when available. Fire flow analysis was not addressed since it was not within the IFCIP scope of work. To address these limitations, LAN recommends re-evaluating future projects once the existing system model is calibrated, and the elevated storage tank study is complete. 4.5 Existing System Recommended Improvements Since the existing system evaluation did not identify any hydraulic capacity issues, no near-term capital improvement projects are recommended for the City's existing system. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 5 S Future System Review 5.1 Future System Demands For uniformity between the water and wastewater plans, Pape-Dawson distributed the demands to future parcels with planned growth for the 2031 and Ultimate planning years.That information was shared with LAN as a GIS shapefile which was imported into the City's model maintained by STV. An estimate of unaccounted-for water (UFW) of 6% was assumed to estimate leakage within the City's water system. InfoWater Pro's Allocation Manager was used to allocate future demands to model nodes following the closest pipe/closest junction rule.The Year 2031 and Ultimate System Average Day Demands (ADD), Maximum Day Demands (MDD), and Peak Hour Demands (PHD) are included in Table 5-1 below. Table 5-1: Existing and Future System Demands Existing Demand 2031 UFW Z Ultimate Demand Demand Peaking Growth Demand Demand Condition Factor' GPM MGD GPM MGD GPM MGD GPM MGD GPM MGD ADD 59,046 85 1 4,518 6.5 63,564 92 3,814 5.5 67,378 97 MDD 74,398 107 1.26 5,692 8.2 80,090 115 4,805 6.9 84,896 122 PHD 83,325 120 1.41 6,370 9.2 89,695 129 5,382 7.7 95,077 137 'Peaking Factor=Demand/ADD ZUFW assumed as 6% 5.2 Modeled O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Production As part of the modeling effort, the water supply needed from the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant (ONSWTP)was evaluated. Based on information from CCW staff,ONSWTP currently treats up to 110 MGD. This confirms the existing demand in the 2022 model of 107 MGD. An additional 19 MGD regular pump capacity will be needed for a new maximum day demand of 129 MGD for projected 2031 system demands.An additional 27 MGD regular pumping capacity is needed meet the ultimate maximum day demand of 137 MGD. The increased production amounts are possible with the existing ONSWTP capacity of 161.5 MGD. 5.3 Future System Evaluations PHD scenarios were developed as the worst-case scenario to identify future IFCIPs. Projects that are currently in various stages of design and construction were provided by the City and implemented into the model. Table 5-2 lists the City's short-range (2022 to 2025) and long-range (2026 to 2027) projects that were incorporated into the future system models for the 2031 and ultimate planning years. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 6 Table 5-2: Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Projects Incorporated in Future Hydraulic Models Timeline CIP# Name Description Short- Flour Bluff 18" Line Existing 18" main extended approximately 14,500 LF Range 22144 Extension and connected to a larger transmission main that FY 2022- runs along Flour Bluff Drive 2025 Leopard St& Up Removal of 32,000 LF of 30" CIP pipe and 21038 River Water Line replacement with new 24" FPVC pipe Replacement Nueces Bay Blvd & Replacement of 9,000 LF of existing 16" CIP water line along W Broadway St and Nueces Bay Blvd, and line 21039 Lane-Water 5,000 LF of existing 16" CIP water line along Poth line Lane with 18" PVC pipe Packery Channel Building a new water transmission line along State 20100 Hwy 361 to provide redundant and reliable water Water Line supply to NCWID#4 Port Avenue Water Replacement of 7,540 LF of existing 16" CIP pipe 19038 Line Replacement along Port Ave from Horne Rd to Guadalupe St with 16" PVC pipe 18156 Ship Channel Water Replacing the existing two 16" water lines that cross Line Relocation the Ship Channel at Avery Point with a 24" steel pipe Water Line Connecting a 42" water line on Whitley across 23033 Extension to Padre Laguna Madre to Coral Vines EST with a 24" pipe Island FY 22: Modifications to Holly and Rand Morgan ESTs. Installation of pressure relief valves (PRVs) Elevated Water FY 24: Completion of new EST in Flour Bluff on E16290 Storage Tanks- Division Road. Citywide FY 25: Completion of new EST on Nueces Bay Boulevard. Demolish old EST at Flour Bluff on Division Road, and old EST on Morgan Long- Rand Morgan 16" Adding an interconnection of 16" transmission main Range LR-13 Water Main along Rand Morgan Rd from Agnes St to McNorton FY 2025- Extension Rd. 2026 Based on the received hydraulic model, the location and capacity of the two new ESTs were assumed as listed in Table 5-3. Table 5-3: New ESTs Properties Name Capacity(MG) Location New Flour Bluff EST 3.0 Division Rd,west of Flour Bluff Dr. New Nueces Bay Blvd EST 1.25 Near the intersection of Nueces Bay Blvd and Hulbirt St. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 7 5.4 TCEQ Capacity Analysis An evaluation of the City's system was performed to determine if the system met the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's(TCEQs) minimum pumpage and storage requirements as outlined in Chapter §290.45 of the Texas Administrative Code. A summary of the applicable TCEQ minimum requirements is included below. TCEQ's requirements are based on the raw number of connections, which have been approximated as the number of households in each of the city's pressure planes. u CEQ Minimum Requirements • Elevated Storage Capacity: Elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection. • Elevated Storage Credit: If an elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is provided, reduced service pumping requirements can be applied as discussed below. • Pressure Tank Capacity: For future systems, if elevated storage is not provided, a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection is required. • Total Storage Capacity(elevated and ground storage):Total storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, inclusive of the 100-gallon minimum requirement listed above. • Service Pump Capacity:A minimum of two(2) pumps with a combined capacity of 2.0 GPM per connection or a total capacity of at least 1,000 gpm and the ability to meet peak hourly demands with the largest pump out of service, whichever is less. For systems that meet the elevated storage credit requirement listed above, a minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection are required for each pump station or pressure plane. The City's existing system is divided into two(2)pressure planes—Main and Padre Island.The 2031 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements except for the elevated storage capacity in the Main Pressure Plane. Results are summarized in Tables 5-4 and 5-5. Table 5-4: 2031 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Main Pressure Plane Main Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Elevated Storage 100 gal/conn 13,502,200 10,000,000 DOESN'T MEET TCEQ Capacity [gal] REQUIREMENTS' Elevated Storage Credit 200 gal/conn 27,004,400 10,000,000 DOESN'T QUALIFY [gal] FOR PUMPING CREDIT Total Storage Capacity 200 gal/conn 27,004,400 37,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS [gal] Service Pump Capacity 2 gpm/conn 101,088 159,924 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS [gpm] 'Options for bringing additional elevated storage on-line or pursuing an Alternative Capacity Requirement(ACR)are part of the separate elevated storage project and report. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 8 Table 5-5: 2031 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Padre Island Pressure Plane Padre Island Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Elevated Storage 100 gal/conn 758,900 1,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Capacity [gal] Elevated Storage Credit 200 gal/conn 1,517 800 1,500,000 DOESN'T QUALIFY [gal] FOR PUMPING CREDIT Total Storage Capacity 200 gal/conn 1,517,800 2,650,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS [gal] tt mpCapacity 2 gpm/conn 5,565 8,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTSPM] 5.5 Future System Draft Recommended Improvements Draft projects for Year 2031 are listed in Table 5-6. No additional projects were required to meet system demands or pressures for the Ultimate scenario in the Main System. Table 5-6: LAN's Recommended Projects for Year 2031 Description Note Replace 8,600 LF of 16" ACP pipe with 16" Prevents low pressures along State Hwy 361 near PVC pipe along State Hwy 361 Frontside Dr Upsize 1,670 LF of 2" to 6" pipe south of Improve minimum pressure along this pipeline Saratoga Blvd and west of Chapman Ranch Rd Model Limitations and Recommendations The limitations encountered by LAN for future model scenarios are detailed in Section 4.4. To address these limitations, LAN recommends re-evaluating future projects once the existing system model is calibrated, and the elevated storage tank study is complete. I ondon nind Cnlnllen Recommended Yenr 2031 Imoroverneints Additional 2031 demands were developed by Pape-Dawson for the high-growth London and Calallen ADPs. LAN incorporated those demands into the Year 2031 model scenario and recommended additional projects to create a framework for development. _3.3.3 �_QJJILQuuuriµJuawC1iiClILJAUVVyoUly �_a;u,iinittee After review by the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) on June 22, 2023, projects ineligible for impact fees were eliminated from the recommendations. Projects outside the City's Certificate of Convenience and Necessity(CCN) boundary and water lines smaller than 12-inches were removed, leaving only the CCW planned CIP. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 19 6 Water Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation This technical memorandum does not include or address water quality performance, or water chemistry, or impacts and/or effects to the distribution or transmission system. Per Pape-Dawson's scope with the City, the O.N. Stevens Surface Water Treatment Plant (ONSWTP) conditions/capacity assessment included the following objectives: • Review of previous evaluations prepared within the last five years. Using information provided by the City, to determine which recommendations from the previous evaluations have been implemented and which remain. Using this existing information,evaluate if existing facilities have the capacity to meet projected 5-year and 10-year flow demands and provide a list of recommended improvements to meet flow demands,focusing only on high-level unit processes. • Visit water treatment plant site and observe major unit processes. Meet with water treatment plant staff to confirm/clarify observations and discuss history of plant operations and maintenance concerns. • Evaluate the current projects identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan to determine the portion associated with maintenance-related versus growth-related costs. LAN's scope for the ONSWTP Asset Evaluation is in line with the Pape-Dawson scope with the City in that: • Review of the water treatment plant is based solely on condition and capacity. • This assessment does not include any water quality evaluations in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Act (US EPA) or (TCEQ) Safe Drinking Water Act compliance. • Any treatability, bench scale or modeling of water quality performance or any water chemistry effects on the distribution system water quality or impacts is excluded from this evaluation. 6.1 Previous Evaluations LAN received no previous reports or evaluations for ONSWTP. Beyond the information provided in the City's Capital Improvement Plans, a site plan map of the ONSWTP master plan and brief phone or email communications, LAN was only able to address facility conditions and operational concerns raised by staff during the site visit. 6.2 Evaluation of Current Processes and Projects LAN performed a site visit October 11, 2021. The site visit involved a guided tour of the facility focused only on high-level unit processes and did not include an in-depth inspection of specific equipment to evaluate treatment performance or condition. LAN had a follow-up staff tele/video meeting with ONSWTP Staff April 20, 2023. The follow-up staff meeting involved a review and discussion of ongoing and future projects. After reviewing observations, plant maintenance history and any operational concerns LAN confirmed that the ongoing ONSWTP master plan had incorporated staff concerns with the facility or operations. Capacity Discussions with Staff confirmed that the existing facility could treat 161.5 MGD and that ONSWTP master plan would increase that capacity to 200 MGD. While individual projects may increase individual process capacities, the facility total capacity will not increase beyond 161.5 MGD until all process improvements are in place. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 10 Specifically Referenced Projects The following were identified in the scope as currently planned projects subject for review in the water master plan.The status or project details are addressed for each project below. • ONSWTP High Service Building No. 3: Project is complete. • ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and Chemical Facilities Improvements: Project E17047 will address existing hydraulic constraints and upgrade chemical feed systems.The scope involves eliminating hydraulic constrictions in the front-end piping, modernizing chemical storage and chemical feed systems to optimize dosage, reliability, monitoring, and control of water treatment chemicals. This is a continuation of projects 180415 and 180156 .The project was scheduled to advertise in 2023 with construction to begin in late 2026 or early 2027. • ONSWTP On-Site Hypochlorite Generation: Projects 21104 and LR 7 consist of replacing the existing, aging chlorine gas system with a safer, more reliable on-site hypochlorite generation system. This will eliminate the health and life risk of exposure to chlorine gas for ONSWTP staff and the surrounding community. Modifications to the existing chlorine dioxide system are also included in this project's scope. Design should be complete and out for bids in the fall.The chlorine system will treat 200 MGD. • ONSWTP Solids Handling and Disposal Facilities: Projects 23059 and LR10 address the design and construction of a new solids handling facility at ONSWTP. ONSWTP uses conventional water treatment processes (coagulation,flocculation, sedimentation, filtration)for removal of turbidity and naturally occurring organic matter. The combination of these processes generates a solids waste stream that is stored using three (3) on-site and four (4) off-site lagoons. Once filled, the on-site lagoons require the City to hire a 3rd party contractor to remove accumulated solids, dewater and haul to the landfill. Further, the initial solids storage permit allowed for permit renewals of off-site lagoon storage only until 2026. It is essential that a new solids handling facility be built at ONSWTP as a long-term solution to manage solids. • ONSWTP Site Infrastructure Improvements: Project E13051 incorporates ongoing operational improvements and/or emergency repair. Improvements include but are not limited to: filter-to- drain sluice gate replacement, filter-to-drain butterfly valves replacement, filter-to-waste butterfly valves replacement, facilitates structural repairs, cable tray foundation repairs and storm water drainage repairs and improvements. There is no projected operational impact with this project, but a reassessment will be done upon completion of the project design to determine ongoing or maintenance costs. • ONSWTP Sedimentation Basin Improvements: Project 18130 addresses the existing Trac-Vac solids collector system at ONSWTP Plant 1 primary sedimentation basin. The existing system is obsolete and has exceeded its useful design life. The current system requires substantial corrective maintenance and has failed often, resulting in inefficient/ineffective solids removal from the basins which impacts the ability to reliably treat water.The scope of this project includes conducting a preliminary design to determine alternatives and best option for replacing the existing system, developing detailed design and construction documents, and providing construction phase services.A one-time removal and disposal of accumulated sludge and existing vegetation in the ONSWTP presedimentation basin is also included. The rebid for the presedimentation dredging is ongoing. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 11 • ONSWTP Clearwell No. 3: Project 18131 will be built to meet the requirements of treatment capacity and operations. Clearwell 1, originally constructed in 1954, has exceeded its design lifespan and sustained severe deterioration. With a capacity of 4 MG, Clearwell 1 can no longer meet TCEQ requirements of providing a minimum clearwell storage capacity. The other existing clearwell,Clearwell No.2 has a capacity of 10 MG and remains in good condition and is functioning as intended. There is no projected operational impact with this project, but a reassessment will be done upon completion of the project design to determine ongoing or maintenance costs.This project has been awarded and is expected to be completed in 2025. • ONSWTP Filtration System Hydraulic Improvements: Project 19032 will upgrade the filtration system components and equipment that has reached its end of service life. The project will also address post-filtration hydraulic bottlenecks which will assist ONSWTP in meeting future capacity requirements of 200 MGD, an increase over the current capacity of 161.5 MGD. Planned improvements will include but are not limited to upgrades to filtration system piping, the replacement of filter gates, valves, and actuators, and filtration system effluent piping and channel hydraulic improvements.There is no projected operational impact with this project, but a reassessment will be done upon completion of the project design to determine ongoing or maintenance costs.This project is currently under design. 7 Water Pump Station and Storage Tanks Evaluation No previous evaluations were received or reviewed including the ongoing elevated storage report which was not complete at the time of the Master Plan. Operations staff indicated that other than the ongoing elevated storage update no deficiencies were noted or observed in regular or critical operations. 8 Water Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan 8.1 Recommended Near-Term Improvements There is a separate ongoing elevated storage report and associated ACR that may have Near Term Improvements identified for TCEQ compliance. No other near-term or existing system deficiencies are identified in this technical memorandum. 8.2 Recommended 2031 Improvements The Recommended 2031 Improvements with a growth component, eligible for impact fee analysis are included in Table 8-1. The complete Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Project Sheets, Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Exhibits, and 2021 Regional Plan Project Information Sheets are included as Appendix A. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 12 Table 8-1: Recommended Growth Projects through Year 2031 Project Number Project Name Planning Cost Growth% WATER SOURCES' LR 2 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure Study $10,000,000 50% E15117 Seawater Desalination $220,736,326 50% LR 3 Seawater Desalination (City's Second $275,000,000 50% Desalination Facility) WATER TREATMENT 18131 ONSWTP Clearwell No. 3 $17,369,000 24% 19032 ONSWTP Filtration System Hydraulic $20,000,000 24% Improvements E17047 ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and $69,300,000 24% Chemical Facilities Improvements LR 8 ONSWTP Clearwell No. 4 $20,000,000 24% ONSWTP Solids Handling& Disposal o 23059 LR 10 $43,700,000 24/ Facility 26003 LR 11 ONSWTP Third Treatment Train $96,000,000 24% 23025 LR 12 ONSWTP Weir Improvements Basins 3 $8,847,000 24% WATER DISTRIBUTION 22144 Flour Bluff 18" Line Extension $8,085,000 100% 21039 Nueces Bay Blvd - Poth Lane Water Line $17,750,000 27% Replacement' LR 17 Rand Morgan 16" Water Main $5,775,000 100% Extension 23033 LR 22 Water Line Extension to Padre Islands $44,310,000 50% LR 24 Water System Integration Piping for $25,000,000 50% New Water Plants ' Water Source IFCIP projects include a 50% factor for resilience or redundancy of the existing water supply and a 50%growth factor. 2 Water Treatment IFCIP projects have a 24% growth factor representing the capacity increase from 161.5 MGD to 200 MGD. 3 Flour Bluff Water Line and Rand Morgan Water Main Extensions are 100% growth, extending service to new developments. 'The Nueces Bay Boulevard / Poth Water line is a 27% upsize over existing capacity for service to new development, and the growth percentage is 27%. 'The Padre Island Extension and New Water Plant Piping represent a 50% growth percentage and a 50% resilience factor for existing water service. 8.3 Recommended Ultimate Improvements Beyond the recommended improvements for Year 2031, no additional system deficiencies are identified requiring water system improvements for the ultimate planning year. Lockwood,Andrews& Newnam, Inc. Page 1 13 Appendix A A-1 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Project Sheets A-2 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Exhibits A-3 2021 Regional Plan Project Information A-1 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Project Sheets City of Corpus ... L:t Number act Name 10-Year Planning Percen c Cost Grovvth WATER SOURCES E13050 LR 1 Choke Canyon Dam Infrastructure Improvements $5,500,000 0% LR 2 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure Study $10,000,000 50 E15117 Seawater Desalination $220,736,326 50% LR 3 Seawater Desalination(City's Second Desalination Facility) $275,000,000 50 20258 Wesley Seale Dam Instrumentation Rehabilitation $3,675,000 0% 22023 LR 4 Wesley Seale Dam Dewatering System and Spillway Gate Rehabilitation $42,900,000 0 LR 5 Wesley Seale Dam Infrastructure Improvements $20,000,000 0 WATER SOURCES PROJECT TOTAL: $577,811,326 -- WATER SUPPLY LINES 23027 Mary Rhodes I Condition Assessment $1,231,000 0 E13037 Mary Rhodes I System Improvements $12,750,000 0% 19025 Mary Rhodes II System Improvements(Bank Erosion) $14,271,000 0 E16417 Nueces River Raw Water Pump Station Transmission Main $330,000 0 LR 6 Mary Rhodes I Pump Station Upgrades $27,300,000 0 WATER SUPPLY LINES PROJECT TOTAL: $55,882,000 -- WATERTREATMENT 21104 LR 7 ONSWTP Chlorine System Improvements $82,700,000 0% 18131 ONSWTP Clearwell No.3 $17,369,000 24% 21030 ONSWTP Electrical Generation&Distribution Improvements $15,975,000 0% 23024 ONSWTP Electrical Reliability Upgrades $8,085,000 0% 19032 ONSWTP Filtration System Hydraulic Improvements $20,000,000 24% 22407 ONSWTP Flocculation Upgrades and Baffling in Basins 1,2 $17,000,000 0% 22406 ONSWTP Fluoride System Improvements $2,420,000 0% 22405 ONSWTP Navigation Pump Station Improvements $10,500,000 0% E17047 ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and Chemical Facilities Improvements $69,300,000 24 22406 ONSWTP Recycle Pond Improvements $4,200,000 0% LR 8 ONSWTP Clearwell No.4 $20,000,000 24% 22408 LR9 ONSWTP Security Upgrade $8,150,000 0% 18130 ONSWTP Sedimentation Basin Improvements $14,145,000 0% E13051 ONSWTP Site Infrastructure Improvements $4,050,000 0% 23059 1 LR 10 JONSWTP Solids Handling&Disposal Facility $43,700,000 24 26003 1 LR 11 JONSWTP Third Treatment Train $96,000,000 24 23025 1 LR 12 JONSWTP Weir Improvements Basins 3&4 $8,847,000 24 WATER TREATMENT PROJECT TOTAL: $442,441,000 -- WATER DISTRIBUTION LINES 23061 16"Water Main Extension-Hwy 286 to Alameda $6,960,000 0% 18154/23064 LR 13 Citywide Large-Size Water Line Cathodic Protection System $9,163,000 0 19037 123065 123107 LR 14 Citywide Water Line Repair/Replacement(Large Diameter) $115,955,655 0% 19010 123073 123108 LR 15 Citywide Water Line Repair/Replacement(Small Diameter) $100,600,000 0% E16290/20267 LR 16 Elevated Water Storage Tanks-Citywide $53,870,000 0 24020 E.Navigation Blvd Water Line Replacement $12,100,000 0% 22144 Flour Bluff 18"Line Extension $8,085,000 100% 21038 Leopard Street&Up River Road Water Line Replacement $17,840,000 0 21039 Nueces Bay Blvd-Poth Lane Water Line Replacement $17,750,000 27 23021 Sand Dollar Connection Line 16"(Coral Vine) $13,260,000 0% 20101 SH286 Water Line Replacement $11,569,000 0 24027 SH358 Water Line Relocation $1,375,000 0% 18156 Ship Channel Water Line Relocation $5,959,787 0 21041 South Side Water Transmission Main Cathodic Protection Improvements $3,300,000 0% LR 17 Rand Morgan 16"Water Main Extension $5,775,000 100% LR 18 Relocation of Water Transmission Line at Corpus Christi Airport $20,000,000 0 LR 19 South Side Transmission Main Line Constraint $7,000,000 0 23060 LR 20 South Side Transmission Grid Completion $51,980,000 0 24021 Up River Rd Water Line Replacement $8,840,000 0% LR 21 Water Line Crossing Replacement-SPID,Hwy 286,US-37 $12,000,000 0% 23033 LR 22 Water Line Extension to Padre Island $44,310,000 50 23068 Water Street Line Improvements $6,385,500 0% LR 23 Water Line Replacement-N.Chaparral&Mesquite Street $15,000,000 0 LR 24 Water System Integration Piping for New Water Plant $25,000,000 50 LR 25 Weber Rd.Water Line Replacement $17,000,000 0 LR 26 West Broadway Street Water Line Replacement $12,000,000 0 WATER DISTRIBUTION LINES PROJECT TOTAL: $603,077,942 -- WATER FACILITIES AND OTHER 23026 Corpus Christi Water Parking Lot Improvements $250,000 0 23080 Corpus Christi Water Warehouse $12,000,000 0% 24001 Open Storage Yard(CC Water) $3,925,000 0 23029 Sunrise Beach Facility Improvements $1,760,000 0% 23051 Warehouse Facility from Ground Storage Tank $3,093,000 0% 24110 Wash Rack Water Utilities $1,396,000 0 21116 Westley Seale Boat and Ramp Pier-(Sunrise Beach) $1,100,000 0% LR 27 lWater Meter Capital Replacement Program $30,000,000 0% LR 28 lWater Utility Support-Streets projects $106,236,279 0% WATER FACILITIES AND OTHER PROJECT TOTAL: $159,760,279 -- WATER PROJECT TOTAL: $1,838,972,547 -- Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E13050 Project Name Choke Canyon Dam Infrastructure Improvements Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District Outside City Limits Status Active Description Choke Canyon Dam is located in South Texas on the Frio River,four miles west of Three Rivers,Texas,and approximately 90 miles northwest of Corpus Christi. The reservoir supplies water for municipal and industrial needs and provides recreational and environmental benefits. This project provides for various repairs and improvements identified by City and Bureau of Reclamation including,but not limited to crane repairs, soil erosion control,electrical system repairs,spillway operator motor brake repair,emergency spillway and low flow outlet controls, instrumentation repairs life safety improvements and other miscellaneous improvements required to maintain the 40-year-old structure and to comply with federal statutes. Justification This project will ensure the normal operation and increase service life of structure. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab Design Eng Admin Reimbursements - Long-Range Costs 5,500,000 Total 5,500,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Grant-American Rescue Act Revenue Bonds - TBD 5,500,000 Total 5,500,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. This project is anticipated to save maintenance and operations costs by avoiding repeated spot repairs and emergency repairs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 2 SEQ LR 2 Project Name Reclaimed Water Infrastucture Study Type Study Department Water Department Useful Life 15 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District All Status Long-Range Description The objective of this project is to develop a reclaimed water infrastructure plan. The plan will include the outline of the distribution network needed within the City for both commercial and institutional customers. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 10,000,000 Total 10,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 10,000,000 Total 10,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E15117 Project Name Seawater Desalination Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Needed-Deficient Services ti Council District 1 r Status Active Description The City's Inner Harbor seawater desalination project consists of the technical feasibility,plant site selection,conceptual life-cycle delivery cost, regulatory and permitting criteria,procurement methodology,and design and construction of a 20 million gallon a day(MGD)and expandable to 30 MGD municipal seawater desalination facility in Nueces County. On April 2020,the City Council approved the submission of an application for a low interest loan from the State for the design and construction for the Inner Harbor seawater desalination facility.Funding was approved in July 2020 and in August 2020 City Council approved the draw of funds for design,RFQ,RFP,land,permits,environmental,legal,power,contingency,and extension of owner's representative agreement for the Inner Harbor facility.In October 2022,the City was granted the Water Rights permit for the Inner Harbor facility by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ).Land Acquisition,TPDES permit,and U.S.Army Corps permitting are underway. Justification Following the 2011-2013 drought of record,the City of Corpus Christi decided to pursue seawater desalination as a new drought-proof water supply for the region. The City is the regional water supplier for commercial,residential,and industrial water needs,serving directly or indirectly approximately 500,000 people across the Coastal Bend.In 2018 the City Council approved a"trigger point"which states that when the region's water supply demands exceed 75%of the firm yield,(the amount of water the City can guarantee during the worst drought of record)the City will need to add a new water supply.Following City Council approval in 2020,the City submitted permit applications for the seawater desalination project. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Planning 2,521,326 Land Acquisition 5,525,000 Construction/Rehab 188,570,000 Design 21,000,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 3,120,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 220,736,326 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 State Water Implementation Fund Texas Loan-2020 9,686,326 State Water Implementation Fund Texas Loan-Future 211,050,000 TBD - Total 220,736,326 Budget Impact/Other Maintenance and operational costs will increase,but corresponding revenues will increase with additional water consumption. The City is also seeking additional grant funding from State and Federal agencies to supplement this project. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 3 SEQ LR 3 Project Name Seawater Desalination(City's Second Desalination Facility) Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Needed-Deficient Services Council District All Status Long-Range Description This project is to design and construct the City's second desalination facility. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 275,000,000 Total 275,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 275,000,000 Total 275,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 20258 - Project Name Wesley Seale Dam Instrumentation Rehabilitation Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District Outside City Limits Status Active' ' Description This project provides for improvements to original instrumentation system including integration with O.N. Stevens WTP process controls in response to previous inspection and priority investment recommendations into the system. This project will protect integrity of Wesley Seale Dam system(1957),to provide for proper inspection and updated regulatory reports per TCEQ and preserve a steady flow of dam stability data over time to better inform future maintenance and repair decisions. Justification This project will improve reliability,comply with state requirements for high hazard dam owners,and reduce costs. This project is required by TCEQ. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 3,000,000 Inspection 250,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 425,000 Long-Range Costs 10,000,000 Total 13,675,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 3,675,000 TBD 10,000,000 Total 13,675,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. This project is required by TCEQ. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 22023 Project Name Wesley Seale Dam Dewatering/Spillway Gate Rehab Type Reconditioning-Asset Longevity Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities - Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District Outside City Limits Status Active Description This project provides a new dewatering system at Wesley Seale Dam,it will protect the integrity of Wesley Seale Dam system(1957),to provide for proper inspection and maintenance of crest gates and seals pursuant to regulatory reports per TCEQ.Project will also provide for necessary improvements to the gates including seal replacement,miscellaneous structural repairs,full gate reconstruction and application of a protective coating system for new gates. The gate reconstruction will be completed in 6 phases. Justification Wesley Seale Dam has 60 crest gates located in two separate spillways: south spillway includes 27 gates and north spillway includes 33 gates. The crest gates are critical infrastructure holding the top 6 feet of water supply in Lake Corpus Christi.Over the years,leakage from side seals has increased and become significant at several gates.Water flow from excessive leakage damages concrete and encourages algae and other vegetative growth. This leads to corrosion issues on gates,metal appurtenances and reinforcing steel. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 14,400,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 1,000,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 15,400,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 15,400,000 TBD - Total 15,400,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 5 SEQ LR 5 Project Name Wesley Seale Dam Infrastructure Improvements Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District Outside City Limits Status Long-Range Description This project will consist of infrastructure improvements to the Wesley Seale Dam. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TSD 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23027 Project Name Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 1 Assessment Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District Outside City Limits Status Active Description The City of Corpus Christi owns and operates the Mary Rhodes Phase I(MRPI)pipeline for the delivery of raw water to the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant from both Lake Texana and the Colorado River.MRPI consists of 101 miles of pipeline to Lake Texana in Edna,TX. The City has a contract with Lavaca-Navidad River Authority to purchase water from Lake Texana. This project consists of an assessment review to determine the condition and capacity of the pipeline.Once assessment is completed rehabilitation and improvements will be carried out in order of priorities determined by the assessment. Justification This project will provided detail and analysis regarding the pipeline efficiency,reliability,and capacity.Required repairs and upgrades will also be identified and designed. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Inspection - Design 1,100,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 131,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 1,231,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds - Raw Water Fund 1,231,000 TBD - Total 1,231,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E13037 �+ Project Name Mary Rhodes Pipeline System Improvements - Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities 1•. Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Health&Safety 4W1 ..!•W l�ifY Council District Outside City Limits �wu Status Active 9'°! Description The City of Corpus Christi owns and operates the Mary Rhodes Phase I(MRPI)pipeline for the delivery of raw water to the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant from both Lake Texana and the Colorado River.MRPI consists of 101 miles of pipeline to Lake Texana in Edna,TX. The City has a contract with Lavaca-Navidad River Authority to purchase water from Lake Texana.Improvements to Mary Rhodes Pipeline Pump Stations are required to ensure continuous water supply from the Phase 1 Pipeline. This project addresses replacement and upgrade of various outdated system components,including,but not limited to electrical,instrumentation,mechanical,structural,incoming power supply upgrades,and HVAC at Woodsboro and Bloomington Pump Stations.A new pumping assembly will be added to the Bloomington pump station. Two new Variable Frequency Drives(VFD)will be installed at Bloomington and one at the Woodsboro pump station. Justification This project improves the operational efficiency and reliability of Mary Rhodes Pipeline pump stations. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 12,000,000 Inspection 250,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 500,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 12,750,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds - Raw Water Fund 12,750,000 TBD - Total 12,750,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 19025 Project Name Mary Rhodes Pipeline II System Improvements(Bank Erosion) Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District Outside City Limits Status Active Description The City of Corpus Christi owns and operates the Mary Rhodes Phase II pipeline(MRPII)for the delivery of raw water to the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant from the Colorado River.MRPII consists of 42 miles of pipeline to the Colorado River in Bay City,TX where the City has a run of the river water rights. This project includes various required improvements to Mary Rhodes Phase 2 pumping system.Improvements include,but are not limited to river bank stabilization due to natural erosion and other improvements as identified. The City applied and was selected for a cost share agreement with the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers under Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946(Public Law 79-526)for a cost share agreement for the riverbank stabilization. The federal cost share portion will be up to S10 million for design and construction. Justification This project improves the operational efficiency and reliability of Mary Rhodes Pipeline pump stations. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Planning - Construction/Rehab 12,250,000 Design 1,226,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 795,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 14,271,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Grant-U.S.Army Corps of Engineers 8,569,900 Revenue Bonds 5,701,100 Raw Water Fund - TBD - Total 14,271,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E16417 Project Name Nueces River Raw Water Pump Station Transmission Main Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description The O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant(ONSWTP)is being upgraded to meet additional demands and treatment capacity requirements. The Nueces River Pump Station supplies water from the Nueces river to the ONSWTP through two—54"pipelines. The project will install a third 54" transmission main from the Nueces River Pump Station to ONSWTP. The project is critical for the ONSWTP to achieve a treatment capacity of 160 MGD. Justification The project improves the transmission capability of the Nueces River Pump Station to provide water to the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab - Contingency 300,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 30,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 330,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 330,000 TBD - Total 330,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 6 SEQ LR 6 Project Name Mary Rhodes I Pump Station Upgrades Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District Outside City Limits Status Long-Range Description This project will address the findings from the Mary Rhodes Pipeline assessment 23027,and can include but is not limited to: replacement of necessary portions of the pipeline with a higher pressure rated pipe(between Edna and Bloomington),adding clean-out stations,cleaning pipeline, installing pumps in all remaining slots for final phase pump buildout,and upsizing the 2 MG tank to a 6 MG tank at both Woodsboro and Bloomington Pump Stations.Each pump station currently houses 4 pumps and a 2 million gallon on-site storage tank.In addition,pipeline is currently rated to run pump schedule 4 for a max of 79 MGD for brief periods of time. These upgrades will allow for the pipeline system to run at design capacity. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 27,300,000 Total 27,300,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 27,300,000 Total 27,300,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 21104 Project Name ONSWTP Chlorine System Improvements Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will replace existing,aging chlorine gas system with safer and more reliable on-site hypochlorite generation system. This will eliminate the health and life risk of exposure to chlorine gas to ONSWTP staff and surrounding communities.Will also include modifications to the existing chlorine dioxide system. Justification Proposed improvements will completely eliminate ONSWTP's dependence on hazardous liquid chlorine for water disinfection thereby reducing health and life risk of ONSWTP staff and surrounding communities. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 65,000,000 Contingency - Eng Admin Reimbursements 2,200,000 Long-Range Costs 15,500,000 Total 82,700,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 67,200,000 TBD 15,500,000 Total 82,700,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 18131 Project Name ONSWTP Clearwell No.3 Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description Clearwell 1 at ONSWTP has a 4 MG capacity and was originally constructed in 1954.It has exceeded its design lifespan with severe deterioration. In addition,with increased treatment capacity of ONSWTP,Clearwell 1 cannot meet TCEQ requirements of providing a minimum clear well storage capacity. This project will build a new Clearwell 3 at ONSWTP to meet the requirements of treatment capacity and operations. The 10 MG Clearwell 2 at ONSWTP remains in good condition and is able to function as intended. Justification This project ensures compliance with TCEQ requirements. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 15,954,000 Design - Contingency 500,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 915,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 17,369,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 17,369,000 TBD - Total 17,369,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 21030 Project Name ONSWTP Electrical Generation&Distribution Improvements Y Type Reconditioning-Asset Longevity Department Water Department w Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Active Description This project consists of technical assistance with troubleshooting electrical and instrumentation issues,configuration,modeling,condition assessments,and electrical system documentation management.Improvements include design and implementation of improved power generation, power feed improvements for the pumping complex,replacement of protection equipment that has reached its service life,and integration of power protection equipment into a real-time monitoring and diagnostic network. Justification This project will prevent plant shutdowns due to aged electrical equipment.Managed electrical system performance with early detection of potential causes of failure will be achieved.Power consumption monitoring for optimization will reduce operational cost. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 15,000,000 Inspection 75,000 Design 900,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 15,975,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 15,975,000 TBD - Total 15,975,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23024 Project Name ONSWTP Electrical Reliability Upgrades Type Reconditioning-Asset Longevity Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will increase electrical reliability and resiliency of the ON Stevens Water Treatment Plant(ONSWTP)based on recommendations from Jacobs Engineering and AEP Texas.Project outcomes include reduced power outages and addition of redundant power capabilities to maintain water treatment and water distribution requirements. Justification Electrical reliability and resiliency is needed at ONSWTP because Power Control Room I(PCR I)is a single point of failure for the plant wide electrical system. The plant has also experienced numerous unplanned AEP outages in the recent past causing pressure drops in the distribution system. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 7,000,000 Design 700,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 385,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 8,085,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 8,085,000 TBD - Total 8,085,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs.Operational budget impact should be improved through more efficient equipment. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 19032 Project Name ONSWTP Filtration System Hydraulic Improvements Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will upgrade filtration system components and equipment that has reached its end of service life.Additionally,the project will addres post-filtration hydraulic issues. The project is required to obtain a reliable treatment capacity of 160 MGD from the ON Stevens Water Treatment Plant.Improvements include but will not be limited to: upgrades to filtration piping;replacement of filter gates,valve,and actuators;and filtration system effiuent piping and channel hydraulic improvements. Justification Proposed improvements will fix the hydraulics on the back end of the plant to facilitate the production of 160 MGD. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 18,750,000 Inspection 250,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 1,000,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 20,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 20,000,000 TBD - Total 20,000,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 22407 Project Name ONSWTP Flocculation Upgrades&Baffling Type Reconditioning-Asset Longevity Department Water Department y r. Useful Life 40 ears Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity - - Council District 1 Status Active Description The purpose of this project is to upgrade the existing walking beam flocculators in basins 1 and 2 at O.N.Stevens Water Treatment Plant. The existing equipment is obsolete,causes operational issues and are high-maintenance. This has necessitated need of replacing these aging equipment with more reliable,low-maintenance equipment like paddle wheel flocculator.Preliminary design will be carried out to evaluate the best suited alternative followed by detailed design and construction. This equipment will provide adequate mixing and prevent floc carryover into other areas of the treatment process and ensure the water treatment plant can continue to meet state and federal drinking water standards. This project will also add baffle walls to Plant 1 Secondary Basins 1 and 2. These baffle walls are intended to provide adequate chemical mixing and even out flow distribution. Justification This project improves water treatment efficiency by upgrading Basin 1 and 2 walking beam flocculators.Baffle walls to be added to Plant 1 and Secondary Basins 1 and 2 which are required for adequate chemical mixing and even flow distribution. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 16,000,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 1,000,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 17,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 17,000,000 TBD - Total 17,000,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24026 Project Name ONSWTP Fluoride System Improvements Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District I -- Status Active Description This project will upgrade the existing Fluoride injection system.Operational issues of the current system will be addressed and upgrades will be implemented to ensure a consistent and effective Fluoride feed.Hydrofluorosilicic acid is added in the treatment of potable water through a controlled liquid feed system at the ONSWTP.As Fluoride is a very corrosive chemical,the design will focus on the safe operation and maintenance of the system. Justification The current system requires upgrades including but not limited to bulk storage,piping replacement,building exhaust,corrosion points,scales, injection points,and pumps. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 1,900,000 Inspection 100,000 Design 300,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 120,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 2,420,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 2,420,000 TBD - Total 2,420,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 22405 Project Name ONSWTP Navigation Pump Station Improvements Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 k Status Active � Description The City of Corpus Christi owns the Navigation Pump Station(PS),located at 302 North Navigation Blvd,Corpus Christi,Texas,which consists o 2- 10 MG tanks.Under the current distribution system set up,the pump station does not contribute to maintenance of system pressure and was taken out of service in 2018 . This project includes changes to Navigation Pump Station and surrounding distribution piping to help the City improve water delivery and water quality in the distribution system.A feasibility study followed by design will be carried out for these improvements. The major anticipated improvements for this project include upgrades to existing three pumps,one new pump and four new VFDs, and potential transmission main upgrades. Justification This project improves the operational efficiency and reliability of the Navigation pump station. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 10,000,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 500,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 10,500,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 10,500,000 TBD - Total 10,500,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E17047 "� `+� I Project Name ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and Chemical Facilities Improvements Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will address existing hydraulic constraints and upgrade the chemical feed systems for optimized dosing,monitoring,and control of water treatment chemicals at ON Stevens Water Treatment Plant. These improvements are necessary to meet TCEQ requirements and support an increase in water treatment capacity. The project is required to achieve a treatment capacity of 135 MGD with a future treatment capacity of 160 MGD. Justification This project will allow the Plant to meet upcoming demand as projected by the Texas Water Development Board,increase treatment capacity and improve treatment efficiency. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 65,000,000 Design - Contingency 1,300,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 3,000,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 69,300,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 PAYGO - Revenue Bonds 10,500,000 TBD - Total 10,500,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. The cost to treat water should be reduced due to increased plant efficiencies. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 22406 J Project Name ONSWTP Recycle Pond Improvements r Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department w —,_w Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities _. 71W Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 !M, -ry-• Status Active Description The O.N.Stevens Water Treatment Plant utilizes Lagoon-7 also known as wash-water recycle pond for decanting solids from backwash water sent by the filters. The decanted water is pumped back to the head of the plant with the help of existing wash-water return pump station located adjacent to the berms. The berm around the ponds is currently experiencing leakage and deterioration that has occurred as a result of this leakage along with weather,runoff,and destructive pests.Leakage has also been observed at the wash-water return pump station. This has necessitated condition assessment to identify extent of damage followed by repairs to prevent failure and reduce leakage.After performing a detailed condition assessment and developing recommendations,necessary repairs shall be carried out to establish the integrity of the earthen berm and associated facilities to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations,and protect the safety of people,property,and the environment as well as aid in optimizing recycled water return. Justification Proposed improvements will repair earthen berms,stop leakage at the pond and at pump station in order to maintain compliance with state and federal regulations,as well as reduce water loss and ensure safe working conditions at the plant. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 2,930,000 Inspection 470,000 Design 350,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 450,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 4,200,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 4,200,000 TBD - Total 4,200,000 Budget Impact/Other There is no projected operational impact with this project at this time.A reassessment will be done upon completion of project to determine on- going or maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 8 SEQ LR 8 Project Name ONSWTP Clearwell No.4 Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Long-Range Description Clearwell#4 will be additional underground storage to replace the Clearwell No.2 constructed in 1981.Project will continue into Year 11 and 12. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TSD 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 22408 +°" Project Name ONSWTP Security Upgrade Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 15 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Needed-Deficient Services y,A Council District I Status Active L Description O.N. Stevens WTP is the only water treatment plant in the city of Corpus Christi and is considered critical infrastructure for residents,schools, hospitals and surrounding industry.Currently the plant is surrounded by chain link fence and minimal security camera presence. This project would upgrade 10 more structurally sound fencing and install additional security cameras around the plant perimeter. This project will be designed and constructed in multiple phases. Justification Project will provide needed security enhancements to protect the O.N. Stevens WTP which is the only water treatment plant in the city of Corpus Christi and is considered critical infrastructure for residents,schools,hospitals and surrounding industry. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 2,000,000 Design 400,000 Capital Equipment 110,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 240,000 Long-Range Costs 5,400,000 Total 8,150,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 2,750,000 TBD 5,400,000 Total 8,150,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 18130 +;� F Project Name ONSWTP Sedimentation Basin Improvements Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will dredge,dewater,haul,and dispose 28,000-44,000 dry tons(DT)of water treatment plant residuals from the pre-sedimentation basin located at ON Stevens Water Treatment Plant(ONSWTP).Project scope also includes remove existing vegetation and cattails from the basin. Justification The pre-sedimentation basin is greater than 40%full and must be dredged to increase storage capacity and assist in construction of E17047 ONSWTP Raw Water Influent and Chemical Feed Improvements project. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 13,000,000 Testing 585,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 560,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 14,145,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 14,145,000 TBD - Total 14,145,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E13051 Project Name ONSWTP Site Infrastructure Improvements t Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District I Status Active Description This project will serve as a mechanism to execute major facility and site improvements,end-of-life equipment replacement,and unanticipated capital upgrades for ONSWTP.Improvements will include,but not limited to,pump station valving;filter-to-drain butterfly valves replacement, filter-to-waste butterfly valves replacement;facilitates structural repairs;cable tray foundation repairs,FBI building relocation,and storm water drainage repair and improvements. Justification Project will reduce risk of unexpected equipment or facilities failure.Responsible,proactive replacement and upgrade instead of reactive emergency repair can reduce cost of operation and better predictable system performance. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 3,500,000 Testing - Design 250,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 300,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 4,050,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 4,050,000 TBD - Total 4,050,000 Budget Impact/Other There is no projected operational impact with this project at this time.A reassessment will be done upon completion of project to determine on- going or maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23059 Project Name ONSWTP Solids Handling&Disposal Facility t Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description The purpose of this project is to design and construct a new solids handling facility at O.N. Stevens WTP.ONSWTP uses conventional water treatment processes(coagulation,flocculation,sedimentation,filtration)for removal of turbidity and naturally occurring organic matter. The combination of these processes generates a solids waste stream that is stored using three(3)on-site and four(4)off-site lagoons.Once filled,the on- site lagoons require the City to hire a 3rd party contractor to remove accumulated solids,dewater and haul to the landfill.Further,the initial solids storage permit allowed for permit renewals of off-site lagoon storage only until 2026.It is essential that a new solids handling facility be built at ONSWTP as a long term solution to manage solids. Justification ONSWTP has limited capacity in on-site lagoons and off-site lagoons for solids storage. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 24,000,000 Design 3,000,000 Contingency 500,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 1,200,000 Long-Range Costs 15,000,000 Total 43,700,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 28,700,000 TBD 15,000,000 Total 43,700,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. The cost to treat the water should be reduced due to plant efficiencies. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 26003 Project Name ONSWTP Third Treatment Train a Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Treatment Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Active Description The ON Stevens Water Treatment Plant was originally constructed in 1954. The master plan for this facility includes the addition of a third treatment train. This expansion is required to obtain a treatment capacity of 160 MGD with a peak capacity of 200 MGD. The additional train will also allow for the ability to complete maintenance and upgrades on the other treatment trains. Justification This expansion is required to obtain a treatment capacity of 160 MGD with a peak capacity of 200 MGD. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Design 5,500,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 500,000 Long-Range Costs 90,000,000 Total 96,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 6,000,000 TBD 90,000,000 Total 96,000,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23025 Project Name ONSWTP Weir Improvements-Basins 3&4 t Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description Basins 3 and 4 located in O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Train 2 are a finger weir style that protrudes from the end of the basins into the secondaries. The general layout of the finger weirs causes an uneven distribution of water flowing over the weirs.Upgrading the weirs to straight weirs along the end of the basin will optimize settling time by allowing the water more time to travel before flowing over the weirs and allow for even distribution of water flow. Justification Upgrading Basins 3 and 4 finger weirs to straight weirs,or an engineer approved style,at the end of the secondaries to improve flows and optimize use of the space for settling. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Design 700,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 77,000 Long-Range Costs 8,070,000 Total 8,847,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 777,000 TBD 8,070,000 Total 8,847,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. The cost to treat the water should be reduced due to plant efficiencies. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23061 ` Project Name 16"Water Main Extension HWY 286-Alameda Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities A .� Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District I — Status Active , Description This project will consist of installing approximately 3,1001f of new 16"PVC main beginning at Crosstown Expressway,running along Caldwell and connecting to a 16"main at Alameda and Laredo.It will make use of the new 16"crossing at Crosstown and provide redudancy to the downtown area. Justification This project will assist in the need for reliable services and will offer redundancy to downtown. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 6,000,000 Design 325,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 635,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 6,960,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 6,960,000 TBD - Total 6,960,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs.Operational budget impact should be improved through more efficient equipment. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 18154/23064 ' Project Name City-Wide Large-Size Water Line Cathodic Protection Type Rehabilitation Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity �� r Council District City-Wide ��— "- Status Active Description A majority of the City's large diameter transmission lines have been in service many years and are made of non-plastic corrosive materials such as Cast Iron Pipe(CIP),Ductile Iron Pipe(DIP),Concrete Steel Cylinder Pressure(CSCP)and steel.In some cases,these lines were installed with cathodic protection systems to help minimize corrosion and in some cases,they were not. This project will ensure reliable delivery of drinking water for years to come by assessing the physical condition,both external and internal,of transmission mains and associated cathodic protection systems and determining the remaining useful life of each asset.In addition,the project will also repair the most critical lines that have significant maintenance/repair history or where failure may be reasonably expected in the near future. Justification This project will improve the service life and water quality of City's large water lines. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 6,000,000 Design 300,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 363,000 Long-Range Costs 2,500,000 Total 9,163,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 6,663,000 TBD 2,500,000 Total 9,163,000 Budget Impact/Other This project itself does not increase revenue or decrease expenses,but it prevents cost of maintenance from rising. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 19037/23065/23107 Project Name City-Wide Water Line Repair/Replace-Large Diameter Type Reconditioning-Asset Longevity Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity �� r Council District City-Wide — "-V Status Active , Description This project provides a strategic lifecycle program for replacement and extension of the City's water distribution system(1,800 miles). The program is flexible and provides a systematic approach to extend service life of the system while enhancing monitoring capability and water quality. The program also provides a mechanism to quickly address emergency and priority projects as they arise reducing service outages,and operational Justification Extension of service life of water mains is critical to ensuring integrity of the system. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 30,000,000 Design 600,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 1,355,655 Long-Range Costs 84,000,000 Total 115,955,655 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Grant-American Rescue Act - Revenue Bonds 31,955,655 TBD 84,000,000 Total 115,955,655 Budget Impact/Other This project itself does not increase revenue or decrease expenses,but it prevents cost of maintenance from rising. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 19010/23073/23108 Project Name City-Wide Water Line Repair/Replace-Small Diameter Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity �� r Council District City-Wide ��— "- Status Active Description This project provides the replacement of small diameter water lines within the City's water distribution system. The strategic life cycle management and replacement of these assets is predicated on an a likelihood-of-failure(LOF)risk analysis that utilizes historical failure data,condition assessments and asset specifications. The program is flexible and provides a systematic approach to replacing aging water lines while enhancing water quality.Additional benefits will include increased distribution reliability with reduced service outages and reduced operational costs. Justification The extension of service life for water mains is critical to ensuring integrity of the system. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 30,000,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 600,000 Long-Range Costs 70,000,000 Total 100,600,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 30,600,000 TBD 70,000,000 Total 100,600,000 Budget Impact/Other This project itself does not increase revenue or decrease expenses,but it prevents cost of maintenance from rising. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# E16290/20267 Project Name Elevated Water Storage Tanks-City-Wide Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities s Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District City-Wide "' .��'w �ti"s'"'• '� Status Active Description The existing Elevated Storage Tanks(EST)have inadequate volume and elevation to meet minimum storage and pressure requirements as defined by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ). The plan to meet these requirements is outlined below: FY 23:Begin construction of new EST in Flour Bluff on Division Road. FY24: Complete Construction of the Flour Bluff EST.Begin design and construction of new Calallen EST,corresponding Calallen pump station located at ON Stevens WTP,and necessary water line improvements.Demolish Morgan EST. FY 25: Complete Construction of new Cal alien EST,pump station,and water line improvements.Demolish old EST at Flour Bluff on Division Road. FY 26:Begin design of new EST at a yet to be determined site pending review and hydraulic modeling. FY 27:Begin construction of new EST at a yet to be determined site. FY 28: Complete construction of new EST at a yet to be determined site. FY 29:Demolish existing Alameda and Gollihar ESTs. Justification This project will allow the city to meet its commitment to TCEQ.Higher tanks will additionally provide higher pressure and better pressure stabilization in the distribution system as required. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 15,000,000 Capital Equipment 700,000 Design 1,470,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 1,200,000 Long-Range Costs 35,500,000 Total 53,870,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 18,370,000 TBD 35,500,000 Total 53,870,000 Budget Impact/Other A reassessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24020 �r Project Name E.Navigation Blvd Water Line Replacement Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will consist of replacement of existing 12"Cast Iron Pipe(CIP)water line along E.Navigation Blvd.from approximately 340 feet west of Burleson St.to approximately 30 feet east of Texaco Street due to condition and age resulting in leaks and failures. The alignment of this existing water line will be reviewed to ensure that a new route meets hydraulic expectations and also provides the appropriate back feed options to ensure that service is reliable. Justification The existing water line is currently aging and in poor condition resulting in leaks and failures. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 11,000,000 Design 500,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 600,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 12,100,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 12,100,000 TBD - Total 12,100,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 22144 Project Name Flour Bluff 18"Line Extension Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 4 Status Active Description The proposed construction would have the existing 18"main extended approximately 12,000 linear feet and connected to a larger transmission main that runs along Flour Bluff Drive. This would provide the redundancy and flows needed to operate the 18"line at its full capacity.Cost estimates and alignment are preliminary and may change during the design phase of the project. Justification This project will connect the 18"water transmission main to a source capable of providing flows that maximizes the delivery of water to Coral Vines EST.Continued growth on Padre Island requires all systems operate to the fullest extent of their design capacity.In addition,due to the Islands isolation from the main land,it is necessary to provide adequate redundancy capable of providing continued service in the event of any parallel system failure. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 7,600,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 485,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 8,085,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Grant-American Rescue Act 6,510,000 Revenue Bonds 1,575,000 TBD - Total 8,085,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 21038 Project Name Leopard St&Up River Rd Water Line Replacement . Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Active Description Project consist of removal of 32000 LF cast iron pipe and replace with new PVC Pipe. This project will serve both residential and commercial services on the north side of IH 37 from Sessions Road to Sharpsburg Road. The diameter of the new line will be reviewed to ensure that it is appropriate for the current hydraulic conditions. Justification The new line will serve the community without outages and other issues.High priority distribution water line. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 17,000,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 840,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 17,840,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Grant-American Rescue Act 9,490,000 Revenue Bonds 8,350,000 TBD - Total 17,840,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 21039 Project Name Nueces Bay Blvd&Poth Lane-Water Line Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Active Description This is a new project to replace the approximately 9,000 LF of existing 16-in CIP water line along West Broadway Street and Nueces Bay Blvd. from the intersection of Nueces Bay Blvd and I-37 Frontage Rd.to the intersection of West Broadway Street and Port Ave;and 5,000 LF of existing 16-in CIP water line along Poth Lane from the intersection of Buddy Lawrence and Upriver Road. The existing 16-in CIP water line was built in 1971-1978, 1954 respectively. Justification The replacement of the existing water line will increase the reliability of service to this area as the current infrastructure is aging. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 17,000,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 750,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 17,750,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 17,750,000 TBD - Total 17,750,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23021 Project Name Sand Dollar Connection Line 16"(Coral Vine) Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 4 Status Active Description This project is designed to extend an existing 16"water line from White Cap to the Coral Vine elevated storage tank and implement water interconnections as needed. This infrastructure will allow the Sand Dollar pump station to more easily control operation of the elevated storage tank on Padre Island and provide adequate supply for the anticipated growth. Justification The Sand Dollar Pump Station has caused distribution difficulties in the past due to its pumping capacity. Strengthening of the distribution system is crucial to ensure normal operations and a reliable water supply to Padre Island. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 12,000,000 Design 600,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 660,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 13,260,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 13,260,000 TBD - Total 13,260,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 20101 Project Name SH286 Water Line Replacement Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity – r Council District Outside City Limits — "-V Status Active , Description This project is required to relocate the existing water line between FM43(Weber Rd)and FM2444(Staples St.)to meet the construction needs of TxDOT's SH286 extension.The new line will adhere to the adopted Master Plan for this area.Due to lack of spacing within TxDOT's right-of way this project will require land acquisition. Justification This project is required to relocate the existing water line between FM43(Weber Rd)and FM2444(Staples St.)to meet the construction needs of TxDOT's SH286 extension.If this project is not completed the TxDOT's SH286 extension project will be delayed. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 11,000,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 569,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 11,569,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 11,569,000 TBD - Total 11,569,000 Budget Impact/Other This project itself does not increase revenue or decrease expenses,but it prevents cost of maintenance from rising. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24027 Project Name SH358 Water Line Relocation Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3/4 Status Active Description The project will relocate waterlines that would be in conflict with the Texas Department of Transportation Ramp Reversal Program between Staples Street and Nile Drive.Eight inch ACP and PVC water line will be relocated along with associated fire hydrants and water meters. The work will be completed prior to ramp reversal work. Justification The Texas Department of Transportation has issued a Notice of Required Accommodation to relocate the water lines in conflict with the SH 358 Phase 11 Ramp Reversal Project. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 1,250,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 125,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 1,375,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 1,375,000 TBD - Total 1,375,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 18156 Project Name Ship Channel Water Line Relocation Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity - r Council District 1 Status Active Description This project is to relocate the existing two 16-in water line crossing the Ship Channel at the Avery Point. The U.S Army Engineering District, Galveston(USAED)will soon commence the deepening and widening of the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. This project is to relocate the existing two 16-in water line crossing the Ship Channel at the Avery Point as required by the USAED to facilitate the construction of Ship Channel deepening. The demolition of the existing two 16-in water lines was planned by the Utilities in-house engineering.City has requested a Consultant Engineer to evaluate the relocation options. This is a 50/50 cost sharing project between the City and the Port of Corpus Christi. Justification The Ship Channel deepening project will be delayed. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 5,659,787 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 300,000 Long-Range Costs 84,000,000 Total 89,959,787 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Port of Corpus Christi 2,979,893 Revenue Bonds 2,979,894 TBD 86,979,893 Total 89,959,787 Budget Impact/Other This project itself does not increase revenue or decrease expenses,but it prevents cost of maintenance from rising. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 21041 Project Name South Side Water Transmission Main Cathodic Protection - Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District City-Wide Status Active Description This project provides for design and construction of Water Distribution Transmission Infrastructure cathodic protection to protect and extend useful service life of the South Side Water Transmission from ON Stevens to Padre Island. This project is part of the citywide water transmission main cathodic protection improvements.Cost estimates and alignment are preliminary and may change during the design phase of the project.Additional work will be performed on the South Side distribution water network to increase efficiency and improve the overall network in this area,which is seeing large growth in housing. Justification Cathodic protection design of water transmission infrastructure will extend useful service life of infrastructure asset. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 2,750,000 Inspection 50,000 Design 250,000 Contingency 25,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 225,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 3,300,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 3,300,000 TBD - Total 3,300,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 17 SEQ LR 17 Project Name Rand Morgan 16"Water Main Extension Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Long-Range Description This project will create an interconnection of a 16"transmission main along Rand Morgan Rd from Agnes st to McNorton Rd. The interconnection will be beneficial as growth and development increases in this area. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 5,775,000 Total 5,775,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 5,775,000 Total 5,775,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 18 SEQ LR 18 Project Name Relocation of Water Transmission Line at Corpus Christi Airport Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 Status Long-Range Description The alignment of the existing 48"transmission line is underneath airport infrastructure. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TSD 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 19 SEQ LR 19 Project Name South Side Transmission Main Line Constraint Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 Status Long-Range Description Re-design of the fault mitigation design on the southside transmission main to eliminate the diameter restriction. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 7,000,000 Total 7,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TSD 7,000,000 Total 7,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23060 Project Name South Side Water Transmission Grid Completion - Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Supply Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 �� - Status Active 7 Description This project is intended to prioritize and complete interconnections between multiple water transmission mains improving the systems redundancy, improve chlorine residuals,and move water more effectively around the City. This project will also allow staff the ability to abandon the 30" transmission main under South Padre Island Drive due to its age and the continued expansion of the roadway. This project may progress into the long range,and will be reviewed for phasing once planning and design has been completed. This project continues on the long range. Justification This project will also allow Utilities staff the ability to abandon the 30"transmission main under South Padre Island Drive due to its age and the continued expansion of the roadway. The new line will improve the functionality of these high priority distribution lines and increase service reliability. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 16,500,000 Design 1,800,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 680,000 Long-Range Costs 33,000,000 Total 51,980,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 18,980,000 TBD 33,000,000 Total 51,980,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24021 Project Name Up River Rd Water Line Replacement Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Health&Safety Council District I Status Active Description This project will consist of removal and replacement of the existing 20"Cast Iron Pipe(CIP)water transmission line. The new line will be reduced in diameter as the current line is oversized. The work will also include a crossing under I-37.All work would be conducted in the same project as Up River Wastewater Force Main project 23038. Justification The existing water line installed in 1930 is in poor condition resulting in leaks and failures. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 8,000,000 Design 400,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 440,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 8,840,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 8,840,000 TBD - Total 8,840,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# SEQ LR 21 Project Name Water Line Crossing Replacement-SPID,Hwy 286,US-37 Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Long-Range Description Current waterline crossings of this major roadways require replacement due to age and condition. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 12,000,000 Total 12,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TSD 12,000,000 Total 12,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23033 Project Name Water Line Extension to Padre Island Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities �`. Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 4 4,v Status Active o y Description The City currently does not have a true redundant water supply source to Padre Island. The line is required to provide a reliable supply for our customers and is critical as development and growth increases.A previous engineering report was conducted in November 2011 to investigate options for provide a redundant supply to Padre Island. The first phase of this project will consist of design only.Construction will take place as a planned long term CIP project. Justification The current water lines provides sufficient capacity but do not provide a true redundant supply.Redundancy is essential to this supply line,if a failure occurs with the current line then the supply to the Island would be insufficient and severely diminished. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Design 3,905,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 405,000 Long-Range Costs 40,000,000 Total 44,310,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 4,310,000 TBD 40,000,000 Total 44,310,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23068 Project Name Water Street Water Line Improvements aF Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 35 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Active Description This project will replace over 4,000 linear feet of a circa 1954,10"cast iron pipe that runs under Water Street from IH 37 to Kinney Ave. The replacement of this water line would lead to fewer water main failures resulting in improved services,less disruption of daily activities and enhanced revitalization of the downtown area. This project would be done in conjunction with the wastewater line to provide all new Utility infrastructure along Water Street. Justification This water main serves much of the downtown district and due to its advanced age is prone to failure. These water main failures can be disruptive to everyday downtown activities,traffic flows and business needs. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 5,500,000 Design 550,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 335,500 Long-Range Costs - Total 6,385,500 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 6,385,500 TBD - Total 6,385,500 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 23 SEQ LR 23 Project Name Water Line Replacement-N.Chaparral&Mesquite Street Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Long-Range Description Project will consist of the replacement of the water line between Chaparral and Mesquite. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 15,000,000 Total 15,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 15,000,000 Total 15,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 24 SEQ LR 24 Project Name Water System Integration Piping for New Water Plant Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District All Status Long-Range Description New water lines required to integrate a new water plant in the system. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 25,000,000 Total 25,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 25,000,000 Total 25,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 25 SEQ LR 25 Project Name Weber Rd.Water Line Replacement Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 Status Long-Range Description Replace existing 16"CIP Water Line from Staples to under SPID. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 17,000,000 Total 17,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TSD 17,000,000 Total 17,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 26 SEQ LR 26 Project Name West Broadway Street Water Line Replacement Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1 Status Long-Range Description Replacement of existing 16"CIP Water Line. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 12,000,000 Total 12,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 12,000,000 Total 12,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas L Project# 23026 Project Name CC Water Parking Lot Improvements Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Site Improvement Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 1/3 Status Active Description This project consists of the rehabilitation and improvements of two large water facility parking lots.First phase will be improvements to the O.N. Stevens WTP parking area near the filter building. Second phase improvements will be to the utilities building parking lot located on Holly Rd. Justification Improve the parking situation and add needed capacity. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 210,000 Design 20,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 20,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 250,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 250,000 TBD - Total 250,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23080 R Project Name CC Water Warehouse Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity NOAA Council District 3 kN m AN Status Active 4 ` Description The purpose of this project is to improve Water Utilities handling,inventory and security of various materials used in daily operations.Utilities is seeking to construct a 30,000 SF warehouse facility that is outfitted with warehouse space,offices,equipment check-out counter,equipment cages, and maintenance area.Materials such as pipe,fittings,meters,and electronics are currently stored in small portable buildings located at the Utilities yard or in open air conditions subjecting inventory to harsh environmental conditions and making proper inventory management difficult. The construction of a new warehouse would allow for the proper stocking levels of all inventory needed to maintain the water distribution system, minimize the exposure of materials to environmental factors,and increase the controls on management of these materials. Additional funds will be used for improvements to the current CCW building,electrical,HVAC and back-up generator. Justification The proposed expansion will improve the operational capacity of the Utilities Department. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 11,200,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 800,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 12,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 12,000,000 TBD - Total 12,000,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24001 Project Name Open Storage Yard(CC Water) Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 Status Active Description The project will consist of renovation and improvement of the land and space located on Civitan Drive,to enable and open storage yard,where there will be storage of products,goods or equipment for the water department. Justification This project will allow and assist the water department to stage needed equipment and supplies to be proactively preparing and strategizing of scheduled future projects. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 3,400,000 Contingency 80,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 445,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 3,925,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 3,925,000 TBD - Total 3,925,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24001 , Project Name Open Storage Yard(CC Water)` Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District Outside City Limits Status Active Description With this project,the existing restroom/shower facilities will be demolished and replaced with new restroom/shower facilities. The existing basketball court will also be renovated to like-new condition with new appurtenances,as well as the addition of a new pavilion to accommodate a designated outdoor activity facility. The new and improved facilities would provide a better experience to sunrise beach visitors and also provide additional actives to diversify the visiting population. Justification These facilities will be updated to meet Texas Accessibility Standards and to provide a higher quality experience to the visitors. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 1,500,000 Design 100,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 160,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 1,760,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 1,760,000 TBD - Total 1,760,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 23051 Project Name Warehouse Facility from Ground Storage Tank Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 Status Active Description The project will consist of the modification of the existing Holly Ground Storage Tank so that it can be utilized for an additional warehouse for the Utility Department.Construction will consist of design modifications and improvements. The construction will consist of modifying the existing ground storage tank located at 2901 Holly Road. This tank is not in service and not planned to be utilized as part of the water distribution system going forward.An engineering feasibility study was conducted by Chuck Anastos and Associates,LLC. The study was submitted March 31,2022. Justification The Utilities Department requires additional warehouse space for materials associated with water line and wastewater line repairs. The primary stored items will consist of piping,valves,and fittings. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 2,400,000 Design 192,000 Contingency 240,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 261,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 3,093,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 3,093,000 TBD - Total 3,093,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 24110 Project Name Wash Rack Water Utilities Type hnprovement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities r Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District 3 i Status Active Description The project will consist of the construction of a wash-rack for standard size vehicles and large equipment assigned to Water Utilities. Construct a(2)bay wash-rack for standard size vehicles and large equipment assigned to Water Utilities complete with a reinforced concrete driveway,security fence,and vacuum stations. Justification The Water department must maintain fleet vehicles which includes periodic washing to prevent premature corrosion and deterioration. The department currently pays outside privately owned car washes,this alternative will be cost effective and offer convenience to the department. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 1,165,000 Design 121,000 Eng Admin Reimbursements 110,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 1,396,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Revenue Bonds 3,093,000 TBD - Total 3,093,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# 21116 Project Name Wesley Seale Boat Ramp and Pier(Sunrise Beach) ■ Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department ° Useful Life 25 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Important-Community Investment A Council District Outside City Limits Status Active Description Sunrise Beach Park is located approximately four miles southwest of Mathis,at the north end of Wesley E. Seale Dam,and includes approximately one mile of shoreline on Lake Corpus Christi. The park is approximately 27 acres in size and accommodates RV and tent camping as well as day use activities such as boating,fishing,and swimming.For decades Sunrise Beach Park was operated by private individuals under contract with the City of Corpus Christi's formerly named Water Department,now Corpus Christi Water.Corpus Christi Water assumed operation of the Park on January 1,2009,with the intent of upgrading facilities,operations and revenues. The Boat Launch and Dock Buildout project includes the planning and design for the construction of a new boat ramp and pier at Sunrise Beach. The addition of a boat ramp will allow for a safer boating experience as well as promote the park and increase revenues. Justification This amenity will increase public and visitors to this recreational park. Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Construction/Rehab 1,000,000 Design - Eng Admin Reimbursements 100,000 Long-Range Costs - Total 1,100,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 PAYGO - Revenue Bonds 1,100,000 TBD - Total 1,100,000 Budget Impact/Other An assessment will be done upon completion of project to determine maintenance costs. Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 27 SEQ LR 27 Project Name Water Meter Capital Replacement Program Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District City-Wide Status Long-Range Description This project will consist of replacement of water meters that have reached the end of their life cycle. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Long-Range Cost 30,000,000 Total 30,000,000 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 30,000,000 Total 30,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Capital Improvement Plan 2024 thru 2033 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project# LR 28 SEQ LR 28 Project Name Water Utility Support-Streets projects Type Improvement/Additions Department Water Department Useful Life 40 years Contact Director of Water Utilities Category Water Distribution Priority Critical-Asset Condition/longevity Council District City-Wide Status Active Description This project will consist of water utility support for street reconstruction as planned and needed for the future term. Justification Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Short-Range Cost 29,236,279 Long-Range Costs 77,000,000 Total 106,236,279 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 106,236,279 Total 106,236,279 Budget Impact/Other A-2 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Exhibits _ v 4,; ` 12 Mary Rhodes'II System E, e r -- oImprovements(Bank Erosion) 474R 239 OChoke Carryon Dam MaryRhotles I Infrastructure Improvements _ System Improvements 11i , J93 / eeeville -' Mary Rhodes I i 'zor �Condion Assessment 10� L� Ez11 0 F Idiil Clayton Oil L \• Pc n'c ve Oak Field c»orge bleat..- - Q U 14 Mary Rhodes l Pump o __.. /emglo Station Upgrades na • Ina 534 /Wr0dsbOro - Aransas i J96 ' • erh ole ills15-51 ---__ _ 3tez - J s3a ..his Aquifer Storage S vlym oath _ Recovery(ASR)Phase I 0:!An d ... Gas Field Fuson Wesley Seale Dam EvangelinelLaguna hea[etl -s Instrumentation Rehabilitation ,V Ground er Project R / �_ 131 �'' i Wesley Seale Dam Dewatering System� n«kpon &Spillway Gate Rehabilitation O Wesley Seale Dam sa/Iarrl rlo Amargosa Iniructure Improvements / Oil F,01 It raft JsR � � s� • �i 359 �1 /dem 15R 631. -� /,Seawater Desalination; • C-Second Faciility Firtsimm0l15 `� PONand�rr�� nglesrde Oil Field Nueces River Raw Water Pump- Station Transmission Main 13• ____ P-Aransas 2040 ❑ Jc q� � ,..-. Reclaimed Water Qorpus Christi IMrastucture Study Seawater Desalination Inner Harbor Al- Legend Water Source&Supply Line CIPS Water Master Plan 2021-2031 Impact Fee e6s N„zCes L3. ®�Master Plan CIPFY2024-2033 Capital Improvement Plan Potential Region N Projects 6� # Water Source and Supply Line Projects September 12,2023 -', -665 36 —•Mary Rhodes Pipeline Lan PAPE -----i a PAPE-DAWSON _ w�E &Newnam,Inc. ��ENGINEERS Jo 0 z a a 12 Miles Site-Wide Improvement Projects: 15 ONSUyrP Chlorine System Improvements • �" (1D7 ONSWrP Electrical Generation&Distribution Improvements t •'a d"M I �r 1 18 ONSUyrP Electrical Reliability Upgrades A{ • ` ��- •^^'� { 21 ONSIMP Fluoride System Improvements tip „�. 22 ONSWrP Navigation Pump Station Improvements �'• wrk 4 26 ONSUyrP Security Upgrade e�. —ire 18.Filtration System Hydraulic Improvements Flocculation Up ratles SWrP Site Infrastructure Improvements — n in 9_ --,.,,dews” 28 ON provemen aA r C t e h Raw Water Influent lig - and Baffling in'Basins l,2 dr. _ ,c t e 28 ONSWrP Solids Handl &Disposal Facilit and Chemical Facihhes gy y. Improvements' 23 18 Filtration System Hydraulic Improvements 7� .� WeirLmpYovements--31 Ba—sms3&4 I 25, Clearwell No.•3 r Clea_ resell No.4 � - � d�� 30 Third Treatment Train . is 7 • � \ 27 Betlimentation Basin w Improvements I '- R 24 Recycle on Improvements <,M. i� J ✓ s�%.� �, .lad., •'' �� P ./ 10:� •W. Water Master Plan 2021-2031 Impact Fee " Capital Improvement Plan Legend Water Treatment:O.N.Stevens 0 ONSUyrP Boundary r1( v September 12,2023 , Q Master Plan CIP FY 20242033 Lockwootl Andrews PAPE-DAWSON .��q do L� &Newnam o t25 250 00 ��ENGINEERS 'w/a,' '+'ye., ", ,y sFeerw+s Spoil Banks Legend w Water Treatment Plant 111T N,a By Pump Station L Calallen ETJ LI 391 Viola ng t Water CCN Boundary L A n"c": RCLimits l T /44� No ch ity Morgan ESPipe 37 EASting _'4 Master Plan CIP FY 2024-2033 40 40 System Storage San Existing GST 480 �Nuepes X32 53 Navigation A Existing EST (22 ONSVVTP Navigation Pump Station Improvements Corpus Ch,�b Masts Plan CIP FY 2024-2033 GST I k at #16"Water Main Extension-Hwy 286 to Alameda 47 22 Navigation PS Y Master Plan CIP FY 2024-2033 EST 37 E.Navigation Blvd Water Line Replacement 'T's Atl 38 Flour Bluff 18"Line Evil 39 Leopard Street&Up River Road Water Line Replacement 40 Nueces Bay Blvd-Poth Lane Water Line Replacement cGolliharEST 41 Sand Dollar Connection Line 16"(Coral Vine) #SH286 Water Line Replacement !da EST #SH358 Water Line Relocation 49 56 V9 44 Ship Channel Water Line Relocation Y 48 Rand Morgan 16"Water Main Evil &M 47 Relocation of Water Transmission Line at Corpus Christi Airportiv...itJ Holy EST Ch,y Ati 49 43 49 South Side Transmission Grid Completion _A,Field 50 Up River Rd Water Line Replacement 49 Corpus Christi 49 N-Al,, # l M Water Line Extension to Padre and dei Oso scoop 'stmg Islm #Water Street Line Improvements 56 Weber Rd.Water Line Replacement 1 at Improvement Pro ects: 49 Fit ur 38 33 Citywide a Water Line Cathodic Protection System 42 Staples GST Bluff EST (34�Cil Water Line Repair/Replacement(Large Diameter) 21 (35�Citywide Water Line Repair/Replacement(Small Diameter) (36�Elevated Water Storage Tanks-Citywide dd—Fie Sand 45 South Side Water Transmission Main Cathodic Protection ImprovementsDollar GST 48 South Side Transmission Main Line Constraint Tailings Pond 51 Water Line Crossing Replacement-SPID,Hwy 286,US-37 Ffl Water Master Plan 2021-2031 Impact Fee 52 Capital Improvement Plan 41 Water Distribution Line Projects Additional Pro ects(Not shoryl September 12,2023 54 Water Line Replacement-N.Chaparral&Mesquite Street core Lockwood -DAWSON 55 Water System Integration Piping for N—Water Plant 8,N am I PAPE Lan ',nc' r.J ENGINEERS 57/VVeSt Broadway street Line Replacement M '�Vin..EST 4, �L 1.�.�L I 1, - , / F7 J A-3 2021 Regional Plan Project Information 2021 Region N Water Plan NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME Project# 5D.7.1 Project Name City of Corpus Christi-ASR Phase I Type hnprovement/Additions Useful Life 40 years Category Water Supply Description The Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery(ASR)Project upcycles treated effluent from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)for beneficial non-potable water supply for industries during droughts and/or high seasonal demands. This project includes two phases (Phase I and II)based on current WWTP treatment capacity and phased according to industrial growth needs up to 18 MGD. Phase I includes the construction of 10 wells at the Corpus Christi International Airport site and transmission pipelines needed for recharge, recovery,and conveyance.Phase I also includes treatment improvements(5 MGD)so that Greenwood WWTP effluent reaches the necessary water quality for aquifer recharge.Costs are included for secondary treatment improvements(Modified Ludzack-Ettinger(MLE)process)and additional tertiary processes(Ozone and Biologically Active Filters(BAF)with Microfiltration polishing). Justification Potential Project for Future Water Supply Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Direct Construction Cost 77,763,772 Studies,Soft Costs,Design,and Contingency 31,165,981 Mobilization(10%) 7,776,377 Bond(5%) 3,888,189 OH&P(10%) 7,776,377 Total 128,370,696 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 128,370,696 Total 128,370,696 Budget Impact/Other Treatment processes for Greenwood WWTP will be selected based on pilot system results and costs will be adjusted accordingly. Cost Estimate from:2021 RWP-Table 5D.7.1 (page 403) Estimated Costs with Ozone+BAF+Microfiltration(High) Sept 2018 costs adjusted for inflation,$1 in Sept 2018=$1.2143 in 2023 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.oasts Bend Re.,o,w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Wirer GI.mor-p G o.Ip Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.7 D.7 Aquifer Storage and Recovery (N-7) 5D.7. 1 Description of Strategy Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) is a process whereby treated water is placed into an aquifer for storage to be recovered during a later time when needed. Treated water is normally recharged into the aquifer through well(s). During the recharge and recovery cycles, well screens placed in productive zones for storage allow water to flow through porous areas of the aquifer. The stored water is then recovered and used when water supplies are constrained, such as during drought, periods of high seasonal demands, or water service interruptions. Monitoring wells are used to help maintain a buffer zone within the aquifer between stored and native groundwater and manage storage for supply system operations. ASR can be readily adapted to current infrastructure, delay costly system improvements, and provide supply system redundancy for reliability. The City of Corpus Christi, in conjunction with the Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Conservation District (District), completed a Corpus Christi ASR Feasibility Project in August 2019. The project was partially funded by a grant from the TWDB to study innovative water solutions to promote long term, cost-effective, reliable water supplies for future growth. The work included (1) developing a field testing approach (2) conducting an exploratory test drilling and sampling program (3) performing a geochemical analysis for source and groundwater compatibility (4) developing a groundwater model and simulating potential ASR operations for long-term drought and supply augmentation during peaking and (5) evaluating ASR operating policies for project implementation. The final report is available on the TWDB website'. During the study, both O.N. Stevens WTP and Greenwood WWTP effluent were evaluated as potential supplies. Based on City staff directives, it was determined that Greenwood WWTP effluent was the preferred recharge source due to less competing needs for its use, native groundwater quality considerations, and more frequent availability for recharge than O.N. Stevens WTP water. A conceptual ASR schematic is shown in Figure 5D.7.1. The Corpus Christi ASR project upcycles treated effluent from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) for beneficial non-potable water supply for industries during droughts and/or high seasonal demands. Greenwood WWTP effluent is treated and conditioned prior to recharge for storage in the brackish Gulf Coast Aquifer System. After multiple cycles, water quality improves and stored water takes on the characteristics of the recharge water separated by a buffer zone from native groundwater. Based on exploratory testing results, the most favorable ASR storage zones are located between 350 and 800 feet below ground surface. The recovered water quality is anticipated to have total dissolved solids (TDS) and chloride levels around 2,000 mg/L and 750 mg/L, respectively. Based on water quality needs, reverse osmosis treatment can be added to reduce TDS and chloride levels. lhttps://www.twdb.texas.gov/p-Liblications/reports/contracted reports/doc/1600011956_Corpus_Christi_ASR.pdf?d= 1581391239865 5D.7-1 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.oast Bend Regional i,,,.,,A, HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 lryWer Planning Group Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] HIGHLY TREATED ff�l EFFLUENT MONITORING WELL MONITORING 1WE11, n i I yPC,7i;4[,k �IJMF}Il N+iPIVE FECOVERY CYvLL 4,-INI Z,)NE ZONE (ALXADWATEF Figure 5D.7.1. Conceptual ASR Process For ASR projects, it is important to evaluate source water compatibility with native groundwater and aquifer minerology to avoid adverse mechanical and chemical processes with project implementation. The geochemical analysis did not identify any fatal flaws, however pilot testing of tertiary treatment of WWTP effluent is needed prior to aquifer recharge and monitoring during pilot testing will be critical in proving up geochemical desk-top analyses prior to full scale project implementation and remove suspended materials to avoid clogging the fine sand in aquifer formation for storage. Prior to implementation, a piloting program is needed to verify field tests and confirm water treatment processes necessary to obtain a TCEQ permit for ASR production, which requires that the source water for recharge to be treated to a sufficient quality so as to not impact or impair the aquifer formation or groundwater. The Greenwood WWTP effluent will need to be improved with additional treatment upgrades to reduce the following constituents in the existing effluent that could affect operations: • Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 5D.7-2 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Iry.Wer Pcinnhp G o.Ip Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] • Nitrate (NO3) • Total Organic Carbon (TOC) • Manganese (Mn) • Bacteria A field-scale groundwater model was constructed using site-specific data collected during the exploratory testing program. The model was then used to simulate most likely ASR operational scenarios2 based on source water availability and future water demands in the vicinity of the project site to determine yield. During scenario development, it was determined that industrial water users in the vicinity of the ASR wellfield would be the most likely customers for recovered water. This determination is based on projected future growth and non-potable needs that could be met with ASR supplies with minimal to no treatment anticipated after recovery. 5D.7.2 Available Yield The Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project is a phased project, with the initial size based on current Greenwood WWTP capacity and capable of expansion to address industrial growth by providing up to 18 MGD of new water supply. Phase I is focused on 10 wells at the Corpus Christi International Airport site and Phase II adds 5 wells to the east of Phase I. A schematic showing transmission pipelines, Phase I and II wells and associated well field pipeline, and delivery location is shown in Figure 5D.7.2. Phase I and II operated conjunctively would be capable of providing about 10 MGD from ASR well operation, and up to 18 MGD with Greenwood WWTP expansion3. The Phase I and II findings from the Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Feasibility Project are as follows: Phase I ➢ Phase I limits recharge to 5 MGD, which is based on current available Greenwood WWTP capacity after considering existing contracts to provide treated effluent to golf courses and would be capable of providing up to 8 MGD through recovery at ASR wells. ➢ If tertiary treated Greenwood WWTP effluent by-passes ASR and is delivered concurrent with ASR recovery, then the combined water supply would be 13 MGD for Phase I. Phase II ➢ Based on City Staff input, Greenwood WWTP will likely be expanded to 10 MGD by 2030 to 2035. With tertiary treatment expansion to 10 MGD, it is assumed that up to 8 MGD would be available for ASR project and/or delivery to industrial customers. Based on conversations with City Staff and stakeholders s Based on City staff feedback, Greenwood WWTP expansion to 12 MGD by Year 2025-2030 would result in about 8 MGD treated effluent available for potential ASR use. 5D.7-3 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 pasta Bend Reg oral HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 AWer Pcirninn G oup Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] ➢ Phase I and II operated conjunctively would provide about 10 MGD from ASR well operation, and up to 18 MGD total by-passed water from Greenwood WWTP expansion4. ,nnIPMime 01 1 A. _ �z Industries] t, w `"c' ^+r.'_ �',, i �•. ASR07 ASR03 ASR04 19 ASR05 ASR A5R17 ASR.4 I-3 I-7 d5R1 I-6 SR 07 ASR08 ASR09 1� ASR•10 1-2 A5R14 1-1 cK ASR•75 m I-4 + VMT Greenwood SP Figure 5D.7.2. Project Layout of the Corpus Christi ASR Feasibility Project(Phase I and ll) 5D.7.3 Environmental Issues The 2001 Agreed Order includes provisions for 151,000 ac-ft/yr of freshwater inflows to the Nueces Bay and Estuary System, made up with a combination of 54,000 ac-ft return flow credit and remaining 97,000 ac-ft from pass-throughs and controlled releases from the CCR/LCC system according to inflow and stored water levels. The actual wastewater discharges in 2017 and 2018 amounted to 84,663 and 92,327 ac-ft, respectively. It is unlikely that use of Greenwood WWTP effluent as a source water for ASR will have a meaningful impact on achieving freshwater inflow requirements associated with the 2001 Agreed Order. a Based on City staff feedback, Greenwood WWTP expansion to 12 MGD by Year 2025-2030 would result in about 8 MGD treated effluent available for potential ASR use. 5D.7-4 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.oasts Bend Re.,o,w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Wirer GI.jrsp p G o-lp Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] The most significant environmental issue associated with this project is repurposing Greenwood WWTP effluent that would otherwise be discharged to Oso Creek. Oso Creek receives treated domestic wastewater from a number of facilities, one industrial facility, three municipal storm sewer systems, four concrete production facilities, and three pesticide plants authorized to discharge. As presented in Table 5D.5.1 (Chapter 5D.5- Reuse), Greenwood WWTP discharged 13,694 ac-ft/yr in 2018. Based on a three year average from January 2015- December 2017, the discharge from Greenwood WWTP was about 5.5 MGD. This represents about 1.7% of the recent discharge to Oso Creek from 2015-20175. Oso Creek (Segment 2485A), is listed6 to have bacteria impairment and water quality concerns of Chlorophyll-a, nitrates, and total P, as shown in Chapter 1- Planning Area Description Table 1.2. Within the Oso Creek watershed, the most probable sources of bacteria is regulated stormwater, industrial sources, and nonpoint sources.' The Texas A&M University at Corpus Christi Center for Coastal Studies and local stakeholders have formed a group to study Oso Creek and in response, the TCEQ adopted a total maximum daily load$ (TMDL) for Oso Creek on July 31, 2019 to monitor and reduce bacterial loads in Oso Creek. The EPA approved the TMDL on October 25, 2019, and is now part of the state's Water Quality Management Plan. The Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board is working to decrease bacterial loads from agriculture by assisting landowners in developing and implementing water quality management plans. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the environmental impact of reducing Greenwood WWTP discharge to use as a supply for ASR. 5D.7.4 Engineering and Costing The ASR project includes two phases (Phase I and II) based on current WWTP treatment capacity and phased according to industrial growth needs. If tertiary treated Greenwood WWTP effluent by-passes ASR and is delivered concurrent with ASR recovery, then the combined water supply would be 13 MGD for Phase I. Phase I and II operated conjunctively would be capable of providing about 10 MGD from ASR well operation, and up to 18 MGD with Greenwood WWTP expansion. The current secondary treatment process at the Greenwood WWTP consists of a conventional, activated sludge treatment system. The system effectively reduces the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and nitrifies the influent ammonia. However, augmentations to the secondary treatment system are required to reduce the effluent nitrate (NO3). This process will reduce NO3 to less than 10 mg/L, the maximum contaminant level (MCL). A Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process is proposed to complete this treatment. To fully treat the wastewater effluent after the MLE process to sufficient quality to be able to inject it into the aquifer, additional unit processes will likely be required. The main parameters to be reduced or removed in the tertiary system are Manganese (Mn), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), and e Table 5. TCEQ, One Total Maximum Daily Load for Indicator Bacteria in Oso Creek,Adopted July 2019. Nueces River Authority 2019 Basin Highlights Report: San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin, Nueces River Basin, Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin. https://www.nueces-ra.orci/CP/CRP/Pdfs/2019 BHR.pdf TCEQ, One Total Maximum Daily Load for Indicator Bacteria in Oso Creek,Adopted July 2019. s https://www.tceq.texas.�4ov/assets/public/waterduality/tmdl167osocreekbacteria/67-osocreekbacteria.pdf 9 Based on City staff feedback, Greenwood WWTP expansion to 12 MGD by Year 2025-2030 would result in about 8 MGD treated effluent available for potential ASR use. 5D.7-5 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Wirer PIriror-h p c=oup Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] bacteria. Three treatment trains are recommended to be compared during the pilot system which will inform and direct the Phase I and II project construction and later expansion of the treatment plant. The proposed pilot plant arrangement is shown in Figure 5D.7.3. In the absence of pilot system results, the cost analysis considers secondary treatment improvements and the additional tertiary system considers the following processes: • Tertiary Membrane Filtration, (TMF or Microfiltration) • Ozone and Biologically Active Filter (BAF) • Ozone and BAF with Microfiltration polishing Microfiltration (TMF) The standard method for removing suspended particles is typically through a membrane filter. Microfiltration, or Tertiary Membrane Filtration (TMF), through hollow fiber membranes is an efficient system to effectively remove particles larger than 1 pm, which includes most bacteria. The system will use a submerged membrane configuration and be maintained with an air scouring system with periodic cleaning using acid based cleaners. The physical filtration mechanism should efficiently remove TSS and bacteria once the MLE system removes NO3. Microfiltration treatment will likely not sufficiently remove TOC or dissolved Mn. Ozone and BAF Biologically active filters (BAF) operate in a similar way as a traditional slow sand filter. However, a biologically active layer is allowed to develop at the surface of the filter to further treat organic constituents. Ozone is used as an oxidizer before the filter to breakdown recalcitrant TOC that was not available to be processed in the secondary treatment. The biological layer for the BAF will then consume the now biodegradable TOC. An additional benefit of the configuration is that any remaining Mn is expected to be oxidized and removed. Potential inefficiencies of the treatment systems is that the bacteria from the biologically active area may be carried into the effluent and TSS will likely not be sufficiently reduced. Ozone and BAF with Microfiltration polishing The combination of the two treatment systems should effectively treat the effluent to a level that will not significantly impact the aquifer environment. All constituents of concern should be removed to meet water quality requirements for ASR injection as detailed previously. This option effectively eliminates individual limitations for the TMF and Ozone/BAF systems. 5D.7-6 OR�� Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I March 2020 Coastal Bend Regional J HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Water Planning Group i x Aquifer Storage and Recovery(31 TAC§357.34&§357.351 Screen Aerated Grlt PCL AtR 9CL LfV La Volla Creek Fine Screen RAS Pilot WAS Reuse Stream �G°riittt Cll�as ifier i TNIF IR ..... PCL—Primary Clarifiers AER—Aerobic Basin ANX A=R scI SCL—Secondary Clarifierscl, UV—Ultraviolet Disinfection RAS—Return Activated Sludge a 8 WAS—Waste Activated Sludge RAs ozone ccr Bioflter, ASR Injection IR—Internal Recycle - ANX—Anoxic Basin wns MLE—Modified Ludzacl-Ettinger MILE ss(NivoeNft) } TMF—Tertiary Membrane Filtration CCT—Contact Chamber Tank Ozone Pilot Svstems Figure 5D.7.3. Proposed Pilot System Configuration Process Flow Diagram 5D.7-7 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 AWer G!unrhp c=oup Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.7.4.1 Phase I Cost Estimate The Phase I planning-level cost estimate includes: • 10 wells constructed and equipped to: o Recharge up to 415 gpm each (total 5.976 MGD, or about 20% extra to account for well downtime and/or maintenance) o Recover up to 685 gpm each (total 9.8 MGD, or about 23% to account for well downtime and/or maintenance) • 5 MGD pump station at Greenwood WWTP (for recharge) • 10.9 MGD booster pump station near Phase I wellfield (for recovery) • 24-inch transmission pipeline from tertiary treatment facilities at Greenwood WWTP to Phase I well field and 8-inch to 30-inch well field piping • 30-inch diameter pipe to deliver total Phase I supply produced by 10 wells to a delivery point located to the north west of the Corpus Christi International Airport on Agnes Road, south of the intersection of Bronco Road and Interstate Hwy 44 • 2 MG terminal storage tank • SCADA estimated at 3% of construction costs • Easement acquisition of 96 acres at cost of$10,000 per acre • Survey and geotech costs estimated at $55,000 per mile • Tertiary treatment (5 MGD) o MLE treatment o Additional tertiary treatment (low to high) ■ Alternative 2: Ozone + BAF (low) ■ Alternative 3: Ozone + BAF + Microfiltration (high) • Yields up to 13 MGD during recovery 0 8 MGD through ASR wellfield operation plus 0 5 MGD through bypass from tertiary treatment facilities at Greenwood WWTP. A cost estimate for Phase I wells and transmission pipelines needed for recharge, recovery, and conveyance is shown in Table 5D.7.1. The costs shown represent a range of treatment processes that will be identified during piloting for subsequent refinement of Phase I costs, accordingly. The total project cost is expected to range from $68,632,000 to $90,199,000 depending on treatment process. The annual cost ranges from $6,979,000 to $8,836,000. The unit cost of water is estimated to be $479 to $606 per ac-ft during recovery, which is the firm yield expected during drought conditions. After adding recharge operations to replenish storage for later recovery, the energy costs increase to $1,633,000. The unit cost increases to $537 to $664 per ac-ft. 5D.7-7-8 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Water Planning Group Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.7.1. Cost Estimate Summary, City of Corpus Christi-ASR Phase I(Low to High Range Based on Treatment) Estimated Costs Estimated Costs Item with Ozone + with Ozone + BAF + BAF(Low) Microfiltration (High) Capital Cost Greenwood WWTP Pump Station (5 MGD Phase 1) $3,914,000 $3,914,000 Booster Pump Station(s)&Storage Tank(s) (10.9 MGD Phase 1) $3,402,000 $3,402,000 Wellfield Piping (13.4 mi (P1), 8 IN -30 IN dia.) $13,855,000 $13,855,000 ASR Wells (10 wells, 685 gpm, 700 ft depth) $11,653,000 $11,653,000 Terminal Storage Tank (2 MG) $1,516,000 $1,516,000 Tertiary Treatment and MLE Upgrade, 5 MGD $12,018,000 $27,112,000 SCADA $1,171,000 $1,624,000 Total Cost of Facilities $47,529,000 $63,076,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond $16,547,000 $21,989,000 Counsel, and Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Environmental&Archaeology Studies and Mitigation $548,000 $548,000 Land Acquisition (96 acres (P1)) $964,000 $964,000 Surveying and Geotechnical (22 miles (P1)) $1,207,000 $1,207,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 1 years with a 0.5% ROI) $1,837,000 $2,415,000 Total Cost of Project $68,632,000 $90,199,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $4,829,000 $6,347,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $297,000 $301,000 Intakes and Pump Stations (2.5%of Cost of Facilities) $147,000 $147,000 Tertiary Treatment(Ozone+ BAF) $913,000 $1,248,000 Pumping Energy Costs (@ 0.08$/kW-hr) $793,000 $793,000 Total Annual Cost $6,979,000 $8,836,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 14,573 14,573 Capacity Cost($/gpd) $5.28 $6.94 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft), during recovery $479 $606 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft), during recovery $148 $171 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons), during recovery 1 $1.471 $1.86 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons), 1 $0.451 $0.52 5D.7-7-9 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Iry.Wer P!unrhp G o-lp Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.7.4.2 Phase II Cost Estimate The Phase II planning-level cost estimate includes: • 15 wells constructed and equipped to: o Recharge up to 415 gpm each for Phase I wells and 500 gpm for Phase II wells (total 9.6 MGD, or about 30% for well downtime and/or maintenance) o Recover up to 685 gpm each for Phase I wells and 750 gpm for Phase 11 wells (total 15.3 MGD to account for well downtime and/or maintenance) • 10 MGD pump station at Greenwood WWTP (for recharge) • 17 MGD booster pump station(s) total • Phase I pipelines + 12-inch transmission pipeline from tertiary treatment facilities at Greenwood WWTP to Phase 11 well field and well field piping • 30-inch diameter pipe to deliver total Phase 11 supply to a delivery point located to the north west of the Corpus Christi International Airport on Agnes Road, south of the intersection of Bronco Road and Interstate Hwy 44 • Two- 2 MG terminal storage tanks (4 MG total) • SCADA estimated at 3% of construction costs • Land acquisition of 155 acres at cost of$10,000 per acre • Survey and geotech costs estimated at $55,000 per mile • Tertiary treatment (10 MGD, total) o MLE treatment o Additional tertiary treatment (low to high) ■ Alternative 2: Ozone + BAF (low) ■ Alternative 3: Ozone + BAF + Microfiltration (high) • Yields up to 18 MGD during recovery 0 10 MGD through ASR wellfield operation plus 0 8 MGD through bypass from tertiary treatment facilities at Greenwood WWTP after expansion. A cost estimate for Phase 11 wells and transmission pipelines needed for recharge, recovery, and conveyance of water to the delivery point for industrial customer use is shown in Table 5D.7.2. Similar to Phase 1, the costs shown represent a range of treatment processes that will be identified during piloting for subsequent refinement of Phase I costs, accordingly. The total project cost is expected to range from $123,253,000 to $174,668,000 depending on treatment process. The annual cost ranges from $12,189,000 to $16,383,000. The unit cost of water is estimated to be $604 to $812 per ac-ft during recovery, which is the firm yield expected during drought conditions. After adding recharge operations to replenish storage for later recovery, the energy costs increase to $1,824,000. The unit cost increases to $646 to $854 per ac-ft. 5D.7-7-10 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Water Planning Group Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.7.2. Cost Estimate Summary, City of Corpus Christi-ASR Phase H(Low to High Range Based on Treatment) Estimated Costs Estimated Costs Item with Ozone + with Ozone + BAF + BAF(Low) Microfiltration (High) Capital Cost Greenwood WWTP Pump Station (10 MGD Phase II) $5,689,000 $5,689,000 Booster Pump Station(s)&Storage Tank(16.9 MGD, 500 HP Phase II) $4,778,000 $4,778,000 Wellfield Piping (24.5 mi (P1+2), 8 IN-30 IN dia.) $23,517,000 $23,517,000 ASR Wells (15 wells, 685-750 gpm, 700-800 ft depth) $18,190,000 $18,190,000 Terminal Storage Tank (4 MG) $3,033,000 $3,033,000 Tertiary Treatment and MLE Upgrade, 10 MGD $28,654,000 $64,641,000 SCADA $2,202,000 $3,281,000 Total Cost of Facilities $86,063,000 $123,129,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond $29,806,000 $42,779,000 Counsel, and Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Environmental&Archaeology Studies and Mitigation $791,000 $791,000 Land Acquisition (155 acres (P1+P2)) $1,553,000 $1,553,000 Surveying and Geotechnical (32 miles (P1+P2)) $1,741,000 $1,741,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 1 years with a 0.5% ROI) $3,299,000 $4,675,000 Total Cost of Project $123,253,000 $174,668,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $8,672,000 $12,290,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $485,000 $496,000 Intakes and Pump Stations (2.5%of Cost of Facilities) $222,000 $222,000 Tertiary Treatment $1,825,000 $2,390,000 Pumping Energy Costs (@ 0.08$/kW-hr) $985,000 $985,000 Total Annual Cost $12,189,000 $16,383,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 20,178 20,178 Capacity Cost($/gpd) $6.84 $9.70 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft), during recovery $604 $812 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft), during recovery $174 $203 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons), during recovery $1.85 $2.49 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gal), recovery $0.53 $0.62 5D.7-7-11 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg oral HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 Wirer PIriror-h p G o-Ap Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.7.5 Implementation Issues The state rules governing most facets of ASR project implementation in Texas are administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and are contained in Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code (30 TAC), Chapter 331, Underground Injection Control (UIC). The TCEQ has primacy from the US EPA to regulate most injection wells through the Texas UIC Program. Since the proposed ASR project does not currently contemplate recovery of water directly to a public water system, rules related to public supply wells and groundwater sources and development, as contained in 30 TAC §290.41 (c), do not apply. Of particular relevance to the proposed ASR project are the requirements in 30 TAC§331.186 (a), which outlines the criteria to be consider by TCEQ in authorizing ASR operations. The effluent from the Greenwood WWTP does not currently meet drinking water standards for chloride, TDS, manganese, and nitrate concentration, or pathogen removal. While it is anticipated that nitrate and manganese will likely be below the drinking water maximum contaminant limit after tertiary treatment, the other parameters will not be significantly altered prior to recharge. As such, the City will need to demonstrate to the TCEQ that proposed ASR well operations will not: 1) render the groundwater produced from the receiving formation harmful or detrimental to people, animals, vegetation, or property, or 2) require an unreasonably higher level of treatment of the groundwater produced from the receiving geologic formation than is necessary for the native groundwater in order to render the groundwater suitable for beneficial use. For most previous ASR applications, TCEQ has required treatment to drinking water standards prior to recharge but newer rules passed in 2015 and described in Section 5 of Exhibit G may give some flexibility since both the quality of the effluent relative to drinking water is considered along with the potential to degrade the native groundwater. This project would improve the native groundwater for constituents more relevant to Safe Drinking Water Act as a result of the tertiary treatment prior to injection that address the constituents above MCL. Although the storage aquifer is considered brackish it would still be classified as an underground source of drinking water (USDW) per Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR) Section 144.3. It is likely that additional treatment at the WWTP may be required by TCEQ to meet MCLs, and could be necessary to maintain ASR operations and water compatibility. Treatment may include modifications to the WWTP's treatment process to promote de-nitrification, reduce turbidity, and improve the disinfection system to further inactivate bacteria. There are several existing wells identified within the ASR study area that will likely be impacted by ASR implementation. Additional efforts to survey unregistered wells in the vicinity of the proposed ASR well field area would be helpful to identify wells to monitor and/or mitigate in advance of commencing ASR operations. Supply protection is within the jurisdictional authority of the District as detailed in the District's 2019 Groundwater Management Plano http://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/docs/GCD/ccasrcd/CCASRCDMe�mtPlan2Ol9.pdpd=1581392749650 5D.7-7-12 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-011 water Planning Group Aquifer Storage and Recovery[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.7.6 Evaluation Summary An evaluation summary of this water management option is provided in Table 5D.7.3. Table 5D.7.3. Evaluation Summary of City of Corpus Christi ASR Project Impact Category Comment(s) a. Water Supply 1 Quantity 1. Firm Yield: 14,573 ac-ft/yr(Phase 1)and 20,178 ac-ft/yr (Phase 11) 2. Reliability 2. Reliable, based on system operations 3. Cost of Treated Water 3. Non-Potable cost: $479-$606 per ac-ft (Phase 1)and $604-$812 per ac-ft(Phase 11) b. Environmental factors 1. Instream flows 1. Low impact. Reduced flow in Oso Creek. 2. Bay and Estuary Inflows and arms of the 2. None or low impact. Gulf of Mexico 3. Wildlife Habitat 3. None or low impact. 4. Wetlands 4. None or low impact. 5. Threatened and Endangered Species 5. None. 6. Cultural Resources 6. No cultural resources affected. 7. Water Quality 7. a. dissolved solids a. Dissolved solids are estimated to be around 2,000 b. salinity mg/L for non-potable use. If water use needed is c. bacteria potable, additional treatment will be required. d. chlorides b. Salinity are addressed for non-potable use. If e. bromide water use needed is potable, additional treatment f. sulfate will be required. g. uranium C. Bacteria is addressed with treatment process. h. arsenic d. Chlorides are estimated to be around 750 mg/L for i. other water quality constituents non-potable use. If water use needed is potable, additional treatment will be required. e-h. None or low impact i. Nitrate, TSS, TOC, and Mn addressed with treatment processes. c. Impacts to agricultural resources and State 0 Reduce discharge to Oso Creek. water resources d. Threats to agriculture and natural resources in None region e. Recreational impacts 0 None f. Equitable Comparison of Strategies 0 Standard analyses and methods used g. Interbasin transfers 0 None h. Third party social and economic impacts from Reduce discharge to Oso Creek. voluntary redistribution of water i. Efficient use of existing water supplies and Reuses water supply and compatible with regional regional opportunities development. j. Effect on navigation None k. Impacts on water pipelines and other facilities None used for water conveyance 5D.7-7-13 2021 Region N Water Plan NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME Project# 5D.8.2 Project Name Evangeline/Laguna Treated Groundwater Project Type Improvement/Additions Useful Life 40 years Category Water Supply Description The Evangeline/Laguna LP Groundwater Project includes groundwater production of up to 25.4 MGD(28,486 acft/yr)from 23,000+acres located in San Patricio County for conveyance and delivery to the City of Corpus Christi and/or future industries in San Patricio County. This project will be phased based on current modeled available groundwater(MAG)limitations,with full well field build-out after 2050. The first phase is a well field with 13 wells,but at full project production,the wellfield consists of 18 wells including contingency. Three raw water delivery options are being considered for the project.Costs are included for the most expensive option(Delivery Option 1). Justification Potential Project for Future Water Supply Expenditures FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 Direct Construction Cost 77,763,772 Studies,Soft Costs,Design,and Contingency 42,510,214 Mobilization(10%) 7,776,377 Bond(5%) 3,888,189 OH&P(10%) 7,776,377 Total 139,714,929 Funding Sources FY 2023-2024 to FY 2032-2033 TBD 139,714,929 Total 139,714,929 Budget Impact/Other Project cost is subject to change depending on the selected raw .�a�.. water delivery option. Cost Estimate from:2021 RWP-Table 5D.8.29(page 456) .. Estimated Costs for Facilities (Delivery Option 1) Sept 2018 costs adjusted for inflation; S1 in Sept 2018=S1.2143 in 2023 ti FN Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.oasts Bend Reg o,w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.8.2 Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Project 5D.8.2.1 Description of Strategy The Evangeline/Laguna LP Groundwater Project includes groundwater production of up to 25.4 MGD (28,486 acft/yr) from 23,000+ acres located in San Patricio County for conveyance and delivery to the City of Corpus Christi and/or future industries in San Patricio County. Figure 5D.8.1 shows the approximate location of the project site. Since the 2016 Plan, project developers have moved this project towards implementation by securing permits from the San Patricio County Groundwater Conservation District (SPCGCD), drilling and collecting data from a test well, and performing a corrosion analysis, but no blending analysis has been conducted yet. The test well water quality results were all within TCEQ drinking water standards. TDS and chloride levels measured at the test well were 792 mg/L and 269 mg/L, respectively. The SPCGCD production permit granted to Evangeline/Laguna LP is for up to 25.4 MGD (28,486 acft/yr), the current modeled available groundwater (MAG) for regional planning purposes limits groundwater production in San Patricio County to 24,873 acft/yr in Year 2020. However, in Year 2050, the full groundwater production equal to the 25.4 MGD permit issued by the SPCGCD is available under regional planning guidelines. This project has been evaluated in two ways for the 2021 Region N Plan: (a) as a raw, groundwater supply with minimal treatment and (b) with groundwater desalination to reduce TDS and chlorides to around 200 mg/L for high water quality use (Chapter 5D.9). The strategy presented here is for the raw, groundwater supply with minimal treatment options based on the water quality results provided by Evangeline/Laguna LP that shows water quality results within TCEQ drinking water standards. This project will be phased based on MAG limitations, with full well field build-out after 2050 as described above. The first phase is a well field with 13 wells (production constrained by MAG), but at full project production, the wellfield consists of 18 wells including contingency. The wells will be around 1,000 ft and have an estimated pumping rate of 1,200 gpm. The current raw groundwater quality is around 800 mg/L TDS, and wells would be screened and operated in such a manner to target groundwater with lower levels of TDS and chlorides. Based on test well data water quality meets drinking water standards and could be delivered to a customer untreated or with minimal chlorine treatment. Three delivery options were evaluated as part of this water management strategy and the costs are provided in the Engineering and Costing Section. 5D.8-34 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional _A,�,,�6„• HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 8 E E 2 Mary Rhodes ~ ... 18 t C Pipeline �j Evangeline-Laguna LP 3 Groundwater Project C C 4 REFUG10 77 EWangeJiue C 5 rim ARti ra-"• „J ti C Laguna - s� 16 Projed'Ama 6 C 1 4 \ G g�� G Legend 5t 75 C' Proposed WSC W Well C 10 Bayside' 74 72 � Desalination Plant C 11C _ C Epsting Wells City Of 73 C Concentrate Disposal: �� t C Proposed Wells Sinton YIePI � Chiltipin Creek , �;. �, Delivery Proposed �,r. � _ Options K Desalination \ Options City of Sinton f ARANSAS —Option2 " WWFP = Option3 Sinton ' -�' _Pipeline Connections i{ SAH PAT2ICItJ 1 Evangeline- _ -� Laguna Pro-ject Future SPMYVD Pump Station Site Mary Rhodes 7F m � e.Taft— •� P ip el in e H z,. 9 Od he N E Gr- my Near San Patrieio Municipal a ' 2 Ylbter District Complex Aransas 11M2019 rr _ Pass/ Portland y Ingleside` r , Corpu -_Ingleside Christi Dn the Bay q _ Figure 5D.8.1. Location of Conceptual Layout of Evangeline/Laguna LP Groundwater Project 5D.8.2.2 Available Yield In the Coastal Bend region, the Gulf Coast Aquifer System is the primary source of substantial groundwater supplies. The most productive water-bearing zone is the Goliad Sand, which is also known as the Evangeline Aquifer. The outcrop of the Goliad Sand is about 50 to 75 miles inland. The formation dips toward the coast at about 20 feet per mile. Near the coast, the shallower Chicot Aquifer provides some groundwater supplies. West of the outcrop of the Goliad Sands, the deeper Jasper Aquifer can supply a moderate amount of groundwater in some areas. The SPCGCD production permit granted to Evangeline/Laguna LP is for up to 25.4 MGD (28,486 acft/yr), the current modeled available groundwater (MAG) for regional planning purposes limits groundwater production in San Patricio County to 24,873 acft/yr in Year 2020. However, in Year 2050, the full groundwater production equal to the 25.4 MGD permit issued by the SPCGCD is available under regional planning guidelines. 5D.8-35 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 AWer Pcirninra G oup Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.8.2.3 Environmental Issues The primary environmental issues related to the development of raw groundwater from the Evangeline Aquifer in San Patricio County are the development of the well fields and associated pipelines, and integration into the pipeline system for conveyance and delivery. The project is located in the Gulf Coastal Plains of Texas Physiographic Province, specifically in the subprovince of the Coastal Prairies. This area is locally characterized as a nearly flat prairie composed of deltaic sands and muds which terminates at the Gulf of Mexico and includes topography changes of less than one foot per mile. Elevation levels in the Coastal Prairies range from 0 to 300 feet above mean sea level. Environmental Considerations Associated with Evangeline-Laguna LP Groundwater Project The Evangeline-Laguna LP Groundwater project includes a well field of 18 water wells located in San Patricio County near its border with Bee County. For this strategy, water would be minimally treated and delivered to the City of Corpus Christi and/or to San Patricio Municipal Water District for future industries in San Patricio County. Three delivery pipeline options are proposed. The proposed transmission pipelines cross areas which are primarily used for pasture and crops. Vegetation types found along the pipeline route also include areas of Mesquite-Live Oak-Bluewood Parks. Planning of the pipeline route should include avoidance of impacts to wetland areas where possible. Although the construction of portions of the treated water pipeline may include the clearing and removal of woody vegetation, destruction of potential habitat can generally be avoided by diverting the corridor through previously disturbed areas. The well field area is primarily located within an area used for crops; however, it also contains smaller portions of Mesquite-Live Oak-Bluewood Parks vegetation areas. Mesquite-Live Oak- Bluewood Parks areas commonly contain plants such as huisache, grajeno, lotebush, pricklypear, agarita, purple threeawn, and Mexican persimmon. Distribution of this vegetation type is found primarily within the South Texas Plains. Site selection for the wells should include the avoidance of impacts to wetland areas. Appropriate pipeline route selection, construction methods and right-of-way selection should avoid or minimize anticipated impacts to potential wetland areas or other waters of the U.S. along the three treated water pipeline options. Area Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat The groundwater project area is located within the Gulf Prairies and Marshes Vegetational Area. Gulf Prairies have slow surface drainage and elevations that range from sea level to 250 feet. These areas include nearly level and virtually undissected plains. Originally the Gulf Prairies were composed of tallgrass prairie and post oak savannah. However tree species such as honey mesquite, and acacia, along with other trees and shrubs have increased in this area forming dense thickets in many places. Typical oak species found in this area include live oak 5D.8-36 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 =. t Bend Regwnai VA r.. HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 a'.cr Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] (Quercus virginiana) and post oak (Q. stellata), in addition to huisache (Acacia smallii), black- brush (A. rigidula), and a dwarf shrub; bushy sea-ox-eye (Borrichia frutescens). Principal climax grasses of the Gulf Prairies include gulf cordgrass (Spartina spartinae), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), and big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii). Prickleypear (Opunita sp.) are common within this area along with forbs including asters (Aster sp.), poppy mallows (Callirhoe sp.), bluebonnets (Lupinus sp.), and evening primroses (Oenothera sp.). Gulf Marshes range from sea level to a few feet in elevation, and include low, wet marshy coast areas commonly covered with saline water. These salty areas support numerous species of sedges (Carex and Cyperus sp.), bulrushes (Scirpus sp.), rushes (Juncus sp.), and grasses. Aquatic forbs found in these areas generally include pepperweeds (Lepidium sp.), smartweeds (Polygonum sp.), cattails (Typha domingensis) and spiderworts (Tradescantia sp.) among others. Game and waterfowl find these low marshy areas to be excellent natural wildlife habitat. Threatened and Endangered Species (ES) The Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, prohibits the "take" of any threatened or endangered species. The term "take" under the ESA means "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to engage in any such conduct." The term "harm" was further defined to include "significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering." Designation of critical habitat areas has been established for the public knowledge where the publishing of such information would not cause harm to the species. Additional federal protection is extended to migratory birds, and bald and golden eagles under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) as amended, and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Protection is also afforded to Texas state-listed species. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) enforces the state regulations. The MBTA protects most bird species, including, but not limited to, cranes, ducks, geese, shore- birds, hawks, and songbirds. Migratory bird pathways, stopover habitats, wintering areas, and breeding areas may occur within and adjacent to the pipeline area, and may be associated with wetlands, ponds, shorelines, riparian corridors, fallow fields and grasslands, and woodland and forested areas. Pipeline construction activities could disturb migratory bird habitats and/or species' activities. Reasonable and prudent measures should be taken to avoid and minimize the potential effects of the proposed project's activities on threatened and endangered species, as well as bald eagles. Species' locations, activities, and habitat requirements should be considered based on U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and TPWD recommendations. In San Patricio County there may occur 40 state-listed endangered or threatened species and 19 federally-listed endangered or threatened wildlife species, according to the county lists of rare species published by the TPWD. A list of these species, their preferred habitat and potential occurrence in the four county areas is provided in Table 5D.8.28. 5D.8-37 FN Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional > I" HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.8.28. Federal- and State-Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Species of Concern Listed for San Patricio County Potential Federal State Common Name Scientific Name Summary of Habitat Preference Occurrence in Status Status Project Area Black-spotted Notophthalmus May be found in resacas and newt meridionalis bodies of water with firm bottoms Resident -- T and little or no vegetation. Sheep frog Hypopachus Predominantly grassland and Resident -- T variolosus savanna. Mainly found in bodies of quiet South Texas siren Siren sp. 1 water, permanent or temporary, Resident -- T (large form) with or without submerged vegetation. Strecker's chorus Wooded floodplains and flats, frog Pseudacris strecked prairies, cultivated fields and Resident -- -- marshes. Haliaeetus Found primarily near rivers and Bald eagle leucocephalus large lakes, nests in tall trees or Resident -- T on cliffs near water. Salt, brackish, and freshwater Black rail Laterallus jamaicensis marshes, pond borders, wet Nesting PT -- meadows and grassy swamps. Botteri's sparrow Peucaea botterii Habitat description is not available Resident -- T at this time. Eskimo Curlew Numenius borealis Nonbreeding in grasslands, Historic LE E pastures and plowed fields Franklin's gull Leucophaeus pipixcan Habitat description is not available Migrant — — at this time. Mountain plover Charadrius montanus Breeding, nesting on shortgrass Resident — — prairie Open country, especially savanna and open woodland, and Northern Falco femoralis sometimes in very barren areas; Migrant LE E Aplomado Falcon septentrionalis grassy plains and valleys with scattered mesquite, yucca, and cactus Piping plover Charadrius melodus Beaches and flats of coastal Migrant LT T Texas Primarily sea coast on tidal flats Red knot Calidris canutus rufa and beaches, herbaceous Resident LT -- wetland, and tidal flat/shore. Lowland forested regions, Swallow-tailed kite Elanoides forficatus especially swampy areas, ranging Resident — T into open woodland. Grassland and short-grass plains Texas Botteri's Aimophila botterii with scattered bushes or shrubs, Sparrow texana sagebrush, mesquite, or yucca; Resident — T nests on ground of low clump of grasses Tropical kingbird Tyrannus Habitat description is not available Resident -- -- melancholicus at this time Tropical parula Setophaga pitiayumi Semi-tropical evergreen woodland Resident -- T along rivers and resacas Western Athene cunicularia Open grasslands, especially Resident burrowing owl hypugaea prairie — — 5D.8-38 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Potential Federal State Common Name Scientific Name Summary of Habitat Preference Occurrence in Status Status Project Area White-faced ibis Plegadis chihi Prefers freshwater marshes Resident _ T White-tailed hawk Buteo albicaudatus Coastal prairies, savannahs and Nesting/Migrant T marshes in Gulf Coastal Plain — Whooping crane Grus Americana Winters in coastal marshes Migrant LE E Forages in prairie ponds, ditches Wood stork Mycteria Americana and shallow standing water; Migrant — T formerly nested in Texas Brooding adults found in fresh or Opossum pipefish Microphis brachyurus low salinity waters and young Aquatic T move or are carried into more Resident saline waters after birth. Snook Centropomus Habitat description is not available Aquatic undecimalis at this time Resident Southern flounder Paralichthys Habitat description is not available Aquatic lethostigma at this time Resident American Bombus Habitat description is not available Resident -- -- bumblebee pensylvanicus at this time Manfreda giant- Most skippers are small and stout- skipper Stallingsia maculosus bodied; name derives from fast, Resident — — erratic flight No accepted Disonycha Habitat description is not available Resident common name stenosticha at this time —No accepted Dacoderus steined Habitat description is not available Resident common name at this time No accepted Cryptocephalus Habitat description is not available Resident common name downiei at this time —No accepted Ormiscus Habitat description is not available Resident common name albofasciatus at this time —No accepted Ceophengus pallidus Habitat description is not available Resident common name at this time — — American badger Taxidea taxus Habitat description is not available Resident — — at this time Roosts in crevices and cracks in Big free-tailed bat Nyctinomops macrotis high canyon walls, but will use Resident -- -- buildings as well. Colonial and cave dwelling, also Cave myotis bat Myotis velifer roosts in rock crevices, old Resident -- -- buildings, carports, and under bridges Found in a variety of habitats in Eastern red bat Lasiurus borealis Texas. Usually associated with Resident -- -- wooded areas. Eastern spotted Catholic, open fields, prairies, skunk Spilogale putorius croplands, fence rows, farmyards, Resident -- -- forest edges, and woodlands Known from montane and riparian Hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus woodland in Trans-Pecos, forest Resident --and woods in east central Texas. Megaptera Open ocean and coastal waters, Humpback whale novaeangliae sometimes including inshore areas Ocean Resident LE E such as bays. 5D.8-39 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Potential Federal State Common Name Scientific Name Summary of Habitat Preference Occurrence in Status Status Project Area Brushlands, fence rows, upland Long-tailed Mustela frenata woods and bottomland Resident -- -- weasel hardwoods, forest edges, and rocky desert scrub Maritime pocket Geomys personatus Fossorial in deep sandy soils. Resident -- -- gopher maritimus Mexican free- Tadarida brasiliensis Found in all habitats, forest to Resident -- -- tailed bat desert. Mountain lion Puma concolor Rugged mountains and riparian Resident -- -- zones Dense chaparral thickets; Ocelot Leopardus pardalis mesquite-thorn shrub and live oak Resident LE E stands Plains spotted Spilogale putorius Open fields, and prairies Resident skunk interrupta — — Southern yellow Lasiurus ega Associated with trees, such as Resident T bat palm trees — Swamp rabbit Sylvilagus aquaticus Habitat description is not available Resident --at this time. Forest, woodland, and riparian Tricolored bat Perimyotis subflavus areas are important. Caves are Resident -- -- very important Western hog- Conepatus leuconotus Woodlands, grasslands, and Resident -- -- nosed skunk deserts to 7,200 feet. White-nosed coati Nasua narica Woodlands, riparian corridors and Transient T canyons — Golden Orb Quadrula aurea Sand/gravel areas in river basins Resident C T No accepted Praticolella candida Habitat description is not available Resident -- -- common name at this time g Alligator Coastal marshes, inland natural American alligator mississippiensis rivers and marshes, manmade Resident -- -- impoundments Atlantic hawksbill Eretmochelys Gulf and bay system,warm Aquatic sea turtle imbricata shallow waters especially in rocky Resident LE E marine environments Irrigation canals and riparian- corridor farmlands in west. Common garter Thamnophis sirtalis Marshy, flooded pastureland, Resident -- -- snake grassy or brushy borders of permanent bodies of water, coastal salt marshes. Eastern box turtle Terrapene carolina Forests, fields, forest-brush and Resident -- -- forest-field ecotones. Green sea turtle Chelonia mydas Gulf and bay systems; shallow Aquatic LT T water seagrass beds Resident Coastal dunes, barrier islands, Keeled earless Holbrookia propinqua and other sandy areas; eats Resident lizard insects and likely other small — — invertebrates Gulf and bay systems for Loggerhead sea Caretta caretta juveniles, adults prefer open Aquatic LT T turtle waters Resident 5D.8-40 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Potential Federal State Common Name Scientific Name Summary of Habitat Preference Occurrence in Status Status Project Area Quite common in gently rolling Massasauga Sistrurus tergeminus prairie occasionally broken by Resident -- -- creek valley or rocky hillside. Northern scarlet Cemophora coccinea Along Gulf Coast, known from snake coped mixed hardwood scrub on sandy Resident -- T soils. Open grassland, prairie, woodland Slender glass Ophisaurus edge, open woodland, oak lizard attenuatus savannas, longleaf pine flatwoods, Resident -- -- scrubby areas, fallow fields, and areas near streams and ponds. Southern spot- Holbrookia lacerata Habitat description is not available tailed earless subcaudalis at this time. Resident -- -- lizard Spot-tailed earless Holbrookia lacerate Open prairie-brushland Resident lizard — — Texas Malaclemys terrapin diamondback littoralis Coastal marshes and tidal flats Resident — — terrapin Texas horned Phrynosoma Varied; sparsely vegetated Resident T lizard cornutum uplands, grass, cactus, brush — Thornbrush-chapparal woodland Texas Indigo Drymarchon of south Texas, in particular dense Resident -- T snake melanurus erebennus riparian corridors. Can do well in suburban and irrigated croplands. Texas scarlet Cemophora coccinea Mixed hardwood scrub on sandy Resident T snake linen soils — Open bush with grass understory; Texas tortoise Gopherus berlandied open grass and bare ground Resident — T avoided Timber/Canebrake Crotalus horridus Floodplains, riparian zones with Resident T rattlesnake dense ground cover — Western box turtle Terrapene ornate Prairie grassland, pasture, fields, Resident -- -- sandhills, and open woodland. Arrowleaf milkvine Matelea sagittifolia Most consistently encountered in Resident -- -- thronscrub in south Texas. Billie's bitterweed Tetraneuris turned Grasslands on shallow sandy soils Resident --and caliche outcrops. Coastal gay- Liatris bracteata Endemic to black clay soils of Resident feather prairie — — Occurs on poorly drained sites on Crestless onion Allium canadense var. sandy substrates within coastal Resident -- -- ecristatum prairies of the Coastal Bend area (Carr 2015) Occurs in sparsely vegetated Croft's bluet Houstonia croftiae areas in grasslands or among Resident -- -- shrubs (Carr 2015) Drummond's Caesalpinia Open areas on sandy clay. Resident -- -- rushpea drummondii Elmendorf's onion Allium elmendorfii Endemic to grassland openings in Resident woodlands — — Greenman's bluet Houstonia parviflora Habitat description is not available Resident --at this time. 5D.8-41 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Potential Federal State Common Name Scientific Name Summary of Habitat Preference Occurrence in Status Status Project Area Indianola Rhynchospora Locally abundant in cattle pastures beakrush indianolensis in some areas (at least during wet Resident -- -- years). Jone's rainlilly Cooperia jonesii Habitat description is not available Resident --at this time. Large selenia Selenia grandis Occurs in seasonally wet clayey Resident -- -- soils in open areas. Shrubs or in grassy openings in Lila de los Llanos Echeandia chandlers subtropical thorn shrublands along Resident Gulf Coast Occurs in a variety of vernally- Low spurge Euphorbia peplidion moist situations in a number of Resident -- -- natural regions. Net-leaf Desmanthus Mostly on clay prairies of the bundleflower reticulatus coastal plain of central and south Resident -- -- Texas. Plains gumweed Grindelia oolepis Coastal prairies on heavy clay Resident soils Occurs on deep heavy black clay soils or sandy loams in swales or Refugio rainlily Zephyranthes drainages on herbaceous Resident -- -- refugiensis grasslands or shrublands on level to rolling landscapes underlain by the Lissie Formation. Sand Brazos mint Brazoria arenaria Sandy areas in South Texas. Resident -- -- Seaside beebalm Monarda maritima Occurs in grasslands and pastures Resident --on sandy soil near the coast. South Texas false Pseudognaphalium Habitat description is not available Resident -- -- cudweed austrotexanum at this time. South Texas Eleocharis Occurring in miscellaneous spikesedge austrotexana wetlands at scattered locations on Resident --the coastal plain. South Texas Polanisia erosa ssp. Habitat description is not available yellow Breviglandulosa at this time. Resident -- -- clammyweed Occurs at scattered sites in Texsa peachbush Prunus texana various well drained sandy Resident -- -- situations. Found in shrublands on clay dunes(lomas)at the mouth of the Texas stonecrop Lenophyllum texanum Rio Grande and on calcareous Resident -- -- rock outcrops at scattered inland sites. Mostly in sparsely vegetated Texas wilkommia Wilkommia texana patches within taller prairies on Resident -- -- var. texana alkaline or saline soils on the Coastal Plain (Carr 2015) Texas windmill- Texas endemic; sandy to sandy Chloris texensis loam soils in bare areas in coastal Resident grass prairie grassland remnants Occurs on barrier islands, shores Tharp's dropseed Sporobolus tharpii of lagoons and bays protected by Resident --the barrier islands, and on shores of a few near-coastal ponds. 5D.8-42 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Potential Federal State Common Name Scientific Name Summary of Habitat Preference Occurrence in Status Status Project Area Three-flower Thurovia triflora Endemic, remnant grasslands and Resident broomweed tidal flats — — Parasitic on various Quercus, Juglans, Rhus, Vitis, Ulmus, and Tree dodder Cuscuta exaltata Diospyros species as well as Resident -- -- Acacia berlandieri and other woody plants. Open or brushy areas on coastal Velvet spurge Euphorbia innocua sands and the south Texas Sand Resident -- -- Sheet. Grasslands, varying from Welder Psilactia heterocarpa midgrass coastal prairies, and Resident -- -- machaeranthera open mesquite-huisache woodlands. Wright's Trichocoronis wrightii Most records from Texas are Historic trichocoronis var. wrightii historical. Resident Source: TPWD, Annotated County List of Rare Species, San Patricio County, July 17, 2019. PT Proposed Threatened LE Federally listed endangered LT Federally listed threatened -- Not Listed (Species of Concern) E State Endangered T State Threatened 5D.8-43 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.oasts Bend Reg o,w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 AWer Pcirninra G o.q, Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Inclusion in Table 5D.8.28 does not imply that a species will occur within the project area, but only acknowledges the potential for occurrence in the project area county. A more intensive field reconnaissance is necessary to confirm and identify specific species habitat that may be present in the project area. The proposed project occurs primarily in areas which have been previously developed and used for farming and pasture for a long period of time. Disturbance within these areas due to construction of the pipeline routes and well field is anticipated to have minimal effect on the existing environment. Although suitable habitat for some listed species may exist within the project areas, no impact is anticipated due to the abundance of similar habitat near the project area and the ability of most species to relocate to those areas if necessary. The presence or absence of potential habitat within an area does not confirm the presence or absence of a listed species. No species specific surveys were conducted in the project area for this report. Wetland Areas Potential wetland impacts could occur along the pipeline and well field areas located near rivers, streams, or marshy areas. The wells, collection system within the well field, and transmission systems should be sited in such a way as to avoid or minimize impacts to these sensitive resources. Potential impacts can be minimized by right-of-way selection and appropriate construction methods, including erosion controls and revegetation procedures. Compensation for net losses of wetland would be required where impacts are unavoidable and a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would be required for impacts to waters of the U.S. Cultural Resources Impacts to National Register-listed properties or districts, state historic sites, cemeteries or other cultural resources that are mapped by the Texas Historical Commission should be easily avoided through planning associated with the development of the well fields and pipeline routes. A cultural resource survey of the well field and pipeline routes for each of the proposed project areas will need to be performed consistent with requirements of the Texas Antiquities Code. Summary of Overall Possible Environmental Impacts Because of the relatively small areas involved, construction and maintenance of surface facilities are not expected to result in substantial environmental impacts. Where environmental resources (e.g., endangered species habitat and cultural resource sites) could be impacted by infrastructure, minor adjustments in facility siting and pipeline alignment would generally be sufficient to avoid or minimize adverse effects. The pumping of groundwater from the Evangeline Aquifer could cause a slight reduction on baseflow in downstream reaches. However, no measurable impact on wildlife along the streams is anticipated from this project. Minor land surface subsidence could potentially occur as a result of lowering of groundwater levels. As a result, drainage patterns and other habitats might change to a small extent. 5D.8-44 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.8.2.4 Engineering and Costing Based on data collected and provided by Evangeline/Laguna LP, the key features identified and evaluated for planning and costing purposes for 2021 Region N Plan water management strategy are as follows: • Wells: The well field consists of 13 wells (production constrained by MAG). At full project production, the wellfield consists of 18 wells including contingency. Well depth = 1,000 ft Pumping rate = 1,200 gallons per minute (gpm) each. Wells are phased based on MAG limitations, with full well field build-out after Year 2050 as described above. • Raw groundwater quality of 800 mg/L TDS is expected, and wells would be screened and operated in such a manner to target groundwater with lower levels of TDS and chlorides. • A purchase cost of raw water of $480.60 per ac-ft. • Facilities are sized to deliver full project amount: 28,486 acft/yr (25 MGD). Yield is limited based on MAG. • Raw water delivery options: o Option 1 - Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Region N Plan With MAG Limits (Delivery Option 1, Figure 5D.8.1) o Option 2 - Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Region N Plan With MAG Limits (Delivery Option 2, Figure 5D.8.1) o Option 3 - Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Region N Plan With MAG Limits (Delivery Option 3, Figure 5D.8.1) Overall, the project cost ranges from $74,596,000 to $115,585,000 depending on delivery option. Annual costs range from $18,492,000 to $22,210,000. At a yield of 24,873 ac-ft/yr, the unit cost of water ranges from $743 to $893 per ac-ft. Cost tables are presented in Table 5D.8.29 through Table 5D.8.32. A cost estimate summarizing updated unit cost with full utilization of Delivery Option 1 after 2050 when sufficient MAG is available is shown in Table 5D.8.30. 5D.8-45 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.8.29. Cost Estimate Summary Water Supply Project Option, September 2018 Prices, Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Region N Plan with MAG Limits (Delivery Option 1) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Primary Pump Station $14,127,000 Transmission Pipeline(36 in dia., 20.5 miles) $28,911,000 Well Fields (18 Wells, only 12 Operating, Pumps, and Piping) $35,051,000 Storage Tanks(Other Than at Booster Pump Stations) $1,956,000 Water Treatment Plant(0 MGD) $0 Total Cost of Facilities $80,045,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, and $26,570,000 Contingencies(30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Environmental &Archaeology Studies and Mitigation $1,002,000 Land Acquisition and Surveying (-80 acres) $532,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 2.5 years with a 0.5% ROI) $7,436,000 Total Cost of Project $115,585,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $8,133,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $659,000 Intakes and Pump Stations(2.5%of Cost of Facilities) $353,000 Pumping Energy Costs(13890348 kW-hr @ 0.08$/kW-hr) $1,111,000 Purchase of Water(24873 acft/yr @ 480.6$/acft) $11,954,000 Total Annual Cost $22,210,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 24,873 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $893 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $566 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $2.74 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons) $1.74 Note: One or more cost element has been calculated externally 5D.8-46 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.8.30. Cost Estimate Summary Water Supply Project Option, September 2018 Prices, Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Up to Permitted Amount after 2050 when MAG is Available (Delivery Option 1) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Primary Pump Station $14,127,000 Transmission Pipeline (36 in dia., 20.5 miles) $28,911,000 Well Fields (18 Wells, Pumps, and Piping) $35,051,000 Storage Tanks(Other Than at Booster Pump Stations) $1,956,000 Water Treatment Plant(0 MGD) $0 Total Cost of Facilities $80,045,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, $26,570,000 and Contingencies (30%for pipes &35%for all other facilities) Environmental&Archaeology Studies and Mitigation $1,002,000 Land Acquisition and Surveying (-80 acres) $532,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 2.5 years with a 0.5% ROI) $7,436,000 Total Cost of Project $115,585,000 Annual Cost Debt Service(3.5 percent, 20 years) $8,133,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $659,000 Intakes and Pump Stations (2.5%of Cost of Facilities) $353,000 Water Treatment Plant $0 Pumping Energy Costs(20142359 kW-hr @ 0.08$/kW-hr) $1,611,000 Purchase of Water(28485 acft/yr @ 480.6$/acft) $13,690,000 Total Annual Cost $24,446,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 28,486 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $858 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $573 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $2.63 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service($ per 1,000 gallons) $1.76 Note: One or more cost element has been calculated externally 5D.8-47 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.8.31. Cost Estimate Summary Water Supply Project Option, September 2018 Prices, Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Region N Plan With MAG Limits (Option 2) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Primary Pump Station $5,769,000 Transmission Pipeline (36 in dia., 5 miles) $8,542,000 Well Fields(18 Wells only 12 Operating, Pumps, and Piping) $35,051,000 Storage Tanks (Other Than at Booster Pump Stations) $1,956,000 Water Treatment Plant(0 MGD) $0 Total Cost of Facilities $51,318,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, and $17,534,000 Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Environmental &Archaeology Studies and Mitigation $622,000 Land Acquisition and Surveying (19 acres) $323,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 2.5 years with a 0.5% ROI) $4,799,000 Total Cost of Project $74,596,000 Annual Cost Debt Service(3.5 percent, 20 years) $5,249,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $455,000 Intakes and Pump Stations(2.5%of Cost of Facilities) $144,000 Pumping Energy Costs(8621955 kW-hr @ 0.08$/kW-hr) $690,000 Purchase of Water(24873 acft/yr @ 480.6$/acft) $11,954,000 Total Annual Cost $18,492,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 24,873 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $743 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $532 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $2.28 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons) $1.63 Note: One or more cost element has been calculated externally 5D.8-48 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Wirer PIriror-h p G o.q, Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.8.32. Cost Estimate Summary Water Supply Project Option, September 2018 Prices, Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Strategy- Region N Plan With MAG Limits (Option 3) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Primary Pump Station $7,672,000 Transmission Pipeline (36 in dia., 5.6 miles) $9,053,000 Well Fields(18 Wells only 12 Operating, Pumps, and Piping) $35,051,000 Storage Tanks(Other Than at Booster Pump Stations) $1,956,000 Water Treatment Plant(0 MGD) $0 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond $18,353,000 Counsel, and Contingencies(30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Environmental&Archaeology Studies and Mitigation $629,000 Land Acquisition and Surveying (20 acres) $327,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 2.5 years with a 0.5% ROI) $5,022,000 Annual Cost Debt Service(3.5 percent, 20 years) $5,493,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $461,000 Intakes and Pump Stations(2.5%of Cost of Facilities) $192,000 Pumping Energy Costs(10149031 kW-hr @ 0.08$/kW-hr) $812,000 MRP Energy and Power Capacity Compensation $207,000 Purchase of Water(24873 acft/yr @ 480.6$/acft) $11,954,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 24,873 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $769 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $548 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $2.36 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons) $1.68 Note: One or more cost element has been calculated externally 5D.8-49 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.pasta Bend Reg ora HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.8.2.5 Implementation Issues The groundwater supply analyses considered for this water management strategy were based on MAGs adopted by local GCD and GMAs according to TWDB guidance for regional water planning. For future planning efforts, new MAGs provided by GCDs and GMAs located in the Coastal Bend Region need to be considered when determining available groundwater supplies. Implementation of the Raw Groundwater Supply Project includes the following issues: • Verification of the Gulf Coast Aquifer water quality for concentrations of the dissolved constituents such as TDS, chloride, sulfate, iron, manganese, radium, uranium, and arsenic; • Purchase of water or lease of property for well field, and coordination with landowners; • Impact of water levels in the aquifer, potential intrusion of saline groundwater, land surface subsidence, and streamflow; • USACE Section 10 and 404 dredge and fill permits for pipelines; • General Land Office Sand and Gravel Removal permit for pipeline and crossings of streams and roads; • General Land Office Easement for use of State-owned lands, if any; • Cultural resources investigations in accordance with the Texas Historical Commission and the Texas Antiquities Code; • Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Sand, Gravel, and Marl permit; and • Mitigation requirements would vary depending on impacts, but could include vegetation restoration, wetland creation or enhancement, or additional land acquisition. 5D.8.2.6 Evaluation Summary An evaluation summary of this regional water management strategy is provided in Table 5D.8.33. 5D.8-50 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 ,.oasts Bend Reg o,w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Wirer PIriror-h p G o.q, Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.8.33. Evaluation Summary of the Evangeline/Laguna LP Raw Groundwater Project Option Impact Category Comment(s) a. Water supply: 1. Quantity 1. Yield limited to 24,873 acft/yr through 2050 based on MAG. 2. Reliability 2. High reliability. 3. Cost of treated water 3. Generally moderate cost; between$743 to$893 per ac-ft for three different delivery options. b. Environmental factors: 1. Instream flows 1. Moderate impact. 2. Bay and estuary inflows and arms of 2. None or low impact. the Gulf of Mexico 3. Wildlife habitat 3. None or low impact 4. Wetlands 4. None or low impact 5. Threatened and endangered species 5. None identified. Project can be adjusted to bypass sensitive areas. Endangered species survey will be needed to identify impacts. 6. Cultural resources 6. Cultural resources survey will be needed to identify any significant sites. 7. Water quality 7. a. dissolved solids a-b,d. Total dissolved solids, chloride, and salinity of water is b. salinity expected to be within TCEQ drinking water standards. c. bacteria C. None or low impact. d. chlorides a-i. Sulfate, uranium and arsenic concentrations in e. bromide groundwater will need to be considered prior to f. sulfate implementation of project. g. uranium h. arsenic i. other water quality constituents c. Impacts to Agricultural Resources or Negligible impacts to agricultural resources. State water resources None or low negative impacts on surface water resources d. Threats to agriculture and natural None or low impacts. Temporary damage due to construction of resources in region pipeline e. Recreational impacts None f. Equitable comparison of strategies Standard analyses and methods used for portions g. Interbasin transfers Not applicable h. Third party social and economic impacts Not applicable from voluntary redistribution of water i. Efficient use of existing water supplies Provides regional opportunities for water that would otherwise and regional opportunities be unused j. Effect on navigation None k. Impacts on water pipelines and other Construction and maintenance of transmission pipeline corridor. facilities used for water conveyance Possible impact to wildlife habitat along pipeline route and right- of-way. 5D.8-51 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional i;,,.,,. ;,.; HDR-007003-10028677-275994-015 Water Planning Group Gulf Coast Aquifer Supplies[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] (This page intentionally left blank.) 5D.8-52 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.10.5 City of Corpus Christi Seawater Desalination- Inner Harbor and La Quinta Channel Projects 5D.10.5.1 Description of Strategy Desalting seawater from the Gulf of Mexico is a potential source of freshwater supplies for municipal and industrial uses. In August 2004, the City of Corpus Christi (City) conducted a feasibility study" funded by the TWDB of a large-scale seawater desalination facility in the Region N area. For the 2006 and 2011 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plans, a large-scale 25 to 100 mgd seawater desalination facility co-sited with the Barney M. Davis Power Station in Corpus Christi near Laguna Madre, Oso Bay, and Corpus Christi Bay was considered. Favorable factors for the Barney Davis power station location include: use of cooling plant effluent for diluting concentrate, ability to use the existing seawater intake infrastructure at the power plant, and close proximity to the water distribution system. The desalination concentrate was considered to be piped out to the open Gulf of Mexico to be discharged in waters over 30 feet deep. The 2011 Coastal Bend Plan estimated the cost of a 25 mgd seawater desalination facility at Barney M. Davis Power Station with 5-mile pipeline delivery to proposed distribution center on the south side of town at $1,696 per ac-ft (or $5.21 per 1,000 gallons) based on September 2008 dollars. Blending with brackish groundwater, previously evaluated in the 2006 Plan, was eliminated from further consideration based on the lack of availability of groundwater at suitable quality (summarized in Chapter 11). The seawater desalination facility co-sited with Barney M. Davis Power Station was included as an alternate strategy in the 2011 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan at the 25 mgd size, which was subsequently updated through amendment in August 2014 to be listed as a recommended strategy in the 2011 Coastal Bend Plan to meet needs beginning in 2020. The City, as a wholesale water provider, continues to evaluate seawater desalination options, including variable desalination programs and combinations with brackish groundwater resources to address future industrial development and anticipated population growth associated with new industry and Eagle Ford Shale production. In April 2014, the Corpus Christi City Council voted to accept a federal, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation grant and transfer funds from the City's Raw Water Supply Development Fund for a City of Corpus Christi Desalination Program Pilot Study. In July 2014, Corpus Christi City Council considered and subsequently adopted a resolution to the 84th Texas Legislature to appropriate funding for FY 16-17 biennium and partnering with local sponsors to implement desalination projects. The City conducted a $3 million demonstration program with support from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to design, construct, and operate a demonstration desalination plant for industrial and drinking water purposes. The objectives of the program are to evaluate the feasibility of seawater desalination and develop cost estimates, to test emerging technologies, and to identify and assess site options and requirements for a full-scale facility.12 With the results of the study, 11 City of Corpus Christi,Draft Report"Large Scale Demonstration Desalination Feasibility Study,"August 2004. 12 City of Corpus Christi website,"Corpus Christi Desalination Demonstration Project",June 2014. http://www.cctexas.coliAssets/Departments/Water/Files/DesalFactSliegLPdf 5D.10-12 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r '-21'A HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 cr Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] the City will consider moving forward with a full-scale desalination project. During preliminary studies, the Barney M. Davis Power Station option was removed from further consideration due to a lack of interest by the power station to participate, as well as the location not being favorable with respect to anticipated industrial and municipal growth areas.13 As of November 2019, two potential sites are being considered by the City of Corpus Christi to provide additional supplies of 10 mgd for Nueces County industries and municipal customers and 20 mgd for San Patricio County: Inner Harbor and La Quinta Channel. These locations are shown in Figure 5D.10.3, with the aerial photograph showing the most current location. o c� F:-;TLAhU y , L N"btft.45 sin -- y—2 T I _ 1- +'Flu alrL i$prey Y. J r� r y4t x Source: Corpus Christi Desalination Demonstration Project Fact Sheet,June 2014(http://www.cctexas.com/Assets/ Departments/water/Files/DesalFactSheet.pdf)and City of Corpus Christi,email October 2019 Figure 5D.10.3. Proposed Location for Seawater Desalination Program The Inner Harbor Desalination site in Nueces County could scale up from 10 to 30 MGD and La Quinta Channel Desalination site in San Patricio County could scale up from 20 to 40 MGD. The plants will likely expand to ultimate capacity in 30 years or more (2070+), but flexibility will be left for significant demand growth in the region. The treatment efficiency of the desalination plant is estimated to be 45- 50 percent. The finished water quality is targeted to be approximately 500 mg/L. The Inner Harbor Plant will treat all of its product water to potable standards and send it through the City of Corpus Christi distribution system. The La Quinta Channel Plant will treat the product water to potable water standards and deliver it to SPMWD. The SPMWD will deliver this water to industrial customers, but they may adjust water quality to meet the needs of different customers. is City of Corpus Christi staff,February 2015. 5D.10-13 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.10.5.2 Available Yield- Inner Harbor Seawater from the Gulf of Mexico is assumed to be available in an unlimited quantity within the context of a supply for the Coastal Bend Region. Also, it is assumed that the cost of Gulf water is zero prior to extraction from the source. The City of Corpus Christi and port industries are currently considering finished desalination supplies of 10 mgd (11,201 ac-ft/yr) to 30 MGD (33,604 ac-ft/yr) at the Inner Harbor facility. 5D.10.5.3 Engineering and Costing- Inner Harbor Based on information provided by City staff and its consultant, the following costs were identified for the Inner Harbor seawater desalination project as shown in Table 5D.10.3 and Table 5D.10.4: • Total estimated construction costs for a 10 mgd Inner Harbor facility $237 million. • Total estimated construction costs for a 30 mgd Inner Harbor facility $563 million. • Lifecycle water production costs, at the fence, are estimate to be $9.87 per 1,000 gallons with debt service for a plant located at the 10 MGD Inner Harbor facility. • Lifecycle water production costs, at the fence, are estimate to be $7.84 per 1,000 gallons with debt service for a plant located at the 30 MGD Inner Harbor facility. Details regarding intake, desalination process, concentrate disposal outfall, and site-specific environmental impacts for transmission and delivery is unavailable at this time. A 3,500 ft raw water pipeline, 2,300 ft concentrate discharge pipeline, and 500 ft product water delivery line are included in the cost estimate, based on information provided by Freese and Nichols. Energy is the largest operational cost of a desalination facility, and energy use is directly proportional to salinity of the source water. Using the Unified Costing Model tool for regional water planning according to TWDB guidelines, which includes a higher cost for operations and maintenance is expected to result in an annual cost around $36,042,000 to $85,875,000 for the 10 MGD and 30 MGD plants. This results in a unit cost of water of$3,218 to $2,555 per ac-ft after debt service for Inner Harbor sites with plant size ranging from 10-30 MGD. Private industry partnerships and funding structures may be considered to help reduce costs and minimize treatment plant operation and maintenance risks assumed by City operators, which may account for costing differences as compared to information shown in Table 5D.10.3 and Table 5D.10.4. The information was developed based on capital costs, project costs, and annual water productions costs provided by Freese and Nichols, updated using the UCM and is relevant for desalination distribution near the facility. Delivery costs to specific industries or municipal distribution system are not included. 5D.10-14 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional i;,,.,,. ;,.; HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 water Planning Group Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.10.3. Cost Estimate Summary, City of Corpus Christi-Inner Harbor 10 mgd Desalination Project(Sept 2018 Prices) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Transmission Pipeline (raw water piping) $25,000,000 Storage Tanks (and Delivery) $11,000,000 Water Treatment Plant(10 MGD) $126,855,000 Total Cost of Facilities $162,855,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, and $55,749,000 Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Land Acquisition and Surveying (12 acres) $50,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 3 years with a 0.5% ROI) $18,039,000 Total Cost of Project $236,693,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $16,654,000 Water Treatment Plant $19,028,000 Total Annual Cost $36,042,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 11,201 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $3,218 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $1,731 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $9.87 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons) $5.31 Note: Costs based on information provided by the City of Corpus Christi. The water treatment plant annual costs from the TWDB uniform costing model includes energy costs associated with use of reverse osmosis membrane treatment to desalinate seawater and produce finished water with TDS levels below the TCEQ regulatory limit. 5D.10-15 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 water Planning Group Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.10.4. Cost Estimate Summary, City of Corpus Christi-Inner Harbor 30 mgd Desalination Project(Sept 2018 Prices) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Transmission Pipeline (raw water piping; brine concentrate disposal x 3) $51,000,000 Storage Tanks (and Delivery)x 3 $33,000,000 Water Treatment Plant(30 MGD) $302,911,000 Total Cost of Facilities $386,911,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, and $132,869,000 Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Land Acquisition and Surveying (26 acres) $108,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 3 years with a 0.5% ROI) $42,891,000 Total Cost of Project $562,779,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $39,598,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $840,000 Water Treatment Plant $45,437,000 Total Annual Cost $85,875,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 33,604 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $2,555 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $1,377 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $7.84 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons) $4.23 Note: Costs based on information provided by the City of Corpus Christi. The water treatment plant annual costs from the TWDB uniform costing model includes energy costs associated with use of reverse osmosis membrane treatment to desalinate seawater and produce finished water with TDS levels below the TCEQ regulatory limit. 5D.10-16 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] 5D.10.5.4 Available Yield- La Quinta Seawater from the Gulf of Mexico is assumed to be available in an unlimited quantity within the context of a supply for the Coastal Bend Region. Also, it is assumed that the cost of Gulf water is zero prior to extraction from the source. The City of Corpus Christi and port industries are currently considering finished desalination supplies of 20 mgd (22,403 ac-ft/yr) to 40 mgd (44,806 ac-ft/yr). 5D.10.5.5 Engineering and Costing- La Quinta Based on information provided by City staff and its consultant, the following costs were identified for the La Quinta Channel seawater desalination project as shown in Table 5D.10.5 and Table 5D.10.6: • Total estimated construction costs for a 20 mgd La Quinta facility $420 million. • Total estimated construction costs for a 40 mgd La Quinta facility $768 million. • Lifecycle water production costs, at the fence, are estimate to be $8.59 per 1,000 gallons with debt service at the 20 MGD La Quinta facility. • Lifecycle water production costs, at the fence, are estimate to be $7.81 per 1,000 gallons with debt service for a plant located at the 40 MGD La Quinta facility. Details regarding intake, desalination process, concentrate disposal outfall, and site-specific environmental impacts for transmission and delivery is unavailable at this time. A 11,800 ft raw water pipeline, 14,500 ft concentrate discharge pipeline, and 2,000 ft product water delivery line are included in the cost estimate, based on information provided by Freese and Nichols. Energy is the largest operational cost of a desalination facility, and energy use is directly proportional to salinity of the source water. Using the Unified Costing Model tool for regional water planning according to TWDB guidelines, which includes a higher cost for operations and maintenance is expected to result in an annual cost around $62,720,000 to $114,102,000. This results in a unit cost of water of$2,800 to $2,547 per ac-ft after debt service for La Quinta sites with plant size ranging from 20-40 MGD. Private industry partnerships and funding structures may be considered to help reduce costs and minimize treatment plant operation and maintenance risks assumed by City operators, which may account for costing differences as compared to information shown in Table 5D.10.5 and Table 5D.10.6. The information presented in the tables was developed based on capital costs, project costs, and annual water productions costs provided by Freese and Nichols, updated using the UCM and is relevant for desalination distribution near the facility. Delivery costs to specific industries or municipal distribution system are not included. 5D.10-17 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 water Planning Group Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.10.5. Cost Estimate Summary, City of Corpus Christi- La Quinta 20 mgd Desalination Project(Sept 2018 Prices) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Transmission Pipeline $78,000,000 Storage Tanks (Other Than at Booster Pump Stations) $13,000,000 Water Treatment Plant(20 MGD) $214,883,000 Total Cost of Facilities $305,883,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, and $103,159,000 Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Land Acquisition and Surveying (19 acres) $79,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 1 years with a 0.5% ROI) $11,251,000 Total Cost of Project $420,372,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $29,578,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $910,000 Water Treatment Plant $32,232,000 Total Annual Cost $62,720,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 22,402 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft), $2,800 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft), $1,479 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons), $8.59 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons), $4.54 Note: Costs based on information provided by the City of Corpus Christi. The water treatment plant annual costs from the TWDB uniform costing model includes energy costs associated with use of reverse osmosis membrane treatment to desalinate seawater and produce finished water with TDS levels below the TCEQ regulatory limit. 5D.10-18 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 water Planning Group Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.10.6. Cost Estimate Summary, City of Corpus Christi- La Quinta 40 mgd Desalination Project(Sept 2018 Prices) Item Estimated Costs for Facilities Transmission Pipeline (raw water piping/intake; brine concentrate disposal x 2) $113,000,000 Storage Tanks (and Delivery)x 2 $26,000,000 Water Treatment Plant(40 MGD) $390,940,000 Engineering and Feasibility Studies, Legal Assistance, Financing, Bond Counsel, and $179,829,000 Contingencies (30%for pipes&35%for all other facilities) Land Acquisition and Surveying (33 acres) $138,000 Interest During Construction (3%for 3 years with a 0.5% ROI) $58,568,000 Annual Cost Debt Service (3.5 percent, 20 years) $54,071,000 Operation and Maintenance Pipeline,Wells, and Storage Tanks (1%of Cost of Facilities) $1,390,000 Water Treatment Plant $58,641,000 Available Project Yield (acft/yr) 44,804 Annual Cost of Water($ per acft) $2,547 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per acft) $1,340 Annual Cost of Water($ per 1,000 gallons) $7.81 Annual Cost of Water After Debt Service ($ per 1,000 gallons) $4.11 Note: Costs based on information provided by the City of Corpus Christi. The water treatment plant annual costs from the TWDB uniform costing model includes energy costs associated with use of reverse osmosis membrane treatment to desalinate seawater and produce finished water with TDS levels below the TCEQ regulatory limit. 5D.10.5.6 Environmental Issues The two project areas being considered by the City of Corpus Christi for the proposed desalination plant are the Inner Harbor and La Quinta sites. The La Quinta option is located on Corpus Christi Bay, east of the inlet to Nueces Bay; the Inner Ship Channel option is located along the Main Turning Basin, near the outlet to Corpus Christi Bay. The specific siting information is still to be determined, but each proposed desalination plant site would be approximately 10 acres in size. Key factors considered in the selection of these two locations are the availability of power, proximity to the water transmission system, the character of the source water, location of a suitable concentrate discharge location, among other environmental considerations.14 Specific siting information for the discharge of desalination concentrate will be determined during project design. Since the desalination concentrate will be saltier than the receiving waters, the 14 City of Corpus Christi Desalination Project Frequently Asked Questions (https://www.cctexas.com/sites/default/files/water-desal-faq-022819.pdf) 5D.10-19 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r w -- HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] City of Corpus Christi has stated that a diffusing system would be desirable to remix the concentrate with the source water. Additional chemicals, which may be used during the filtering/treating process, may be present in the concentrate. The outfall for brine concentrate will need to consider impacts to the estuary and bay system. Prior to construction, site specific environmental studies will need to be conducted to evaluate all potential impacts to the environment, and identify best management practices to eliminate or reduce adverse impacts. 16 The City plans to submit water rights and discharge permit applications to TCEQ in 2020. Inner Harbor Desalination Site The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department maintains the Texas Natural Diversity Database (TXNDD) which documents the occurrence of endangered, threatened and rare species, natural communities, and animal aggregations. The TXNDD data was reviewed for recorded occurrences of listed or rare species or natural communities, near the proposed project. The plains spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius interrupts), a rare species has been documented at the project site. The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), a federally-listed threatened species, and a marine mammal with protections under the Marine Mammal Protection Act has been documented within two miles of the proposed project site. Three rare species, the Texas diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin littoralis), Texas stonecrop (Lenophyllum texanum), and Texas windmill grass (Chloris texensis) have also been documented within two miles of the proposed project. The TXNDD data identified a colonial wading bird colony (rookery) on the northeast side of the causeway (US 181) across Nueces Bay. National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps were reviewed and the proposed Inner Harbor Desalination site may be in close proximity to estuarine and marine deepwater habitat, freshwater ponds, and freshwater emergent wetlands. A jurisdictional determination of waters should be completed for the proposed project site, during project planning. Coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would be required for impacts to waters of the U.S. The proposed desalination plant would be located on the Inner Harbor. The Corpus Christi Inner Harbor (TCEQ Segment 2484) is listed as impaired on TCEQ's 2020 Draft 303(d) List 16 for copper in the water. Within approximately 5 miles, several Corpus Christi Bay Recreational Beaches (TCEQ Segments 2481 CB_03, _04 and _06) are listed as impaired for bacteria in water. Additionally, the inlet to Nueces Bay (Oyster Water) (TCEQ Segment 24820W) is likely within 5 miles of the proposed desalination plant and is listed as impaired for copper in water. Cultural resources protection on public lands in Texas is afforded by the Antiquities Code of Texas (Title 9, Chapter 191, Texas Natural Resource Code of 1977), the National Historic Preservation Act (PI96-515), and the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act (PL93-291). Based on the review of publicly available Geographic Information System (GIS) records obtained from the Texas Historical Commission, there are no State Historic Sites, National City of Corpus Christi Desalination Project Frequently Asked Questions (https://www.cctexas.com/sites/default/files/water-desal-faq-022819.pdf) 16 TCEQ,2020. Draft 2020 Texas Integrated Repot—Texas 303(d)List(Category 5). Accessed online https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/waterqualiiy/swgm assess/2Otxir/2020_303d.pdf January 13,2020. 5D.10-20 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Register Properties or Districts, cemeteries or Historical Markers within the project area. Two cemeteries, New Bayview and Old Bayview, as well as five sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the Nueces County Courthouse, Simon Gugenheim House, Charlotte Sidbury House, S. Julius Lichtenstein House, and the U.S.S. Lexington were located within approximately one mile from the project area. A review of archaeological resources in the proposed project area should be conducted during the project planning phase. Because the owner or controller of the proposed project, the City of Corpus Christi, is a political subdivision of the State of Texas they will be required to coordinate with the Texas Historical Commission prior to project construction. La Quinta Desalination Site The TXNDD data was reviewed for documented occurrences of listed or rare species or natural communities near the project area. The federally-listed endangered jaguarundi (Felis yagouaroundi cacomitli), as well as several rare species or SGCN, the keeled earless lizard (Holbrookia propinqua), coastal gay-feather (Liatris bracteata), threeflower broomweed (Thurovia triflora), Indianola beakrush (Rynchospora indianolensis), and Wright's trichocoronis (Trichocoronis wrightii var wrightii) have been documented within two miles of the proposed La Quinta site. Additionally, a rookery was documented on the spoil banks in Corpus Christi Bay, located southeast of the project area. National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps were reviewed and the proposed La Quinta Desalination site may be in close proximity to estuarine and marine deepwater habitat, estuarine and marine wetlands, freshwater ponds, and lakes. A jurisdictional determination of waters should be completed for the proposed project site, during project planning. Coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would be required for impacts to waters of the U.S. The proposed desalination plant would be located on the Corpus Christi Bay (TCEQ Segment 2481 OW)." This Segment is not listed as impaired on the 2020 Draft 303(d) List. No impaired water quality segments are likely located within 5 miles of the proposed project site. Based on the review of publicly available GIS records obtained from the Texas Historical Commission, there are no State Historic Sites, National Register Properties or Districts, cemeteries or Historical Markers within the project area, or within one mile of the proposed project area. A review of archaeological resources in the proposed project area should be conducted during the project planning phase. Because the owner or controller of the proposed project, the City of Corpus Christi, is a political subdivision of the State of Texas (i.e., river authority, municipality, county, etc.), they will be required to coordinate with the Texas Historical Commission prior to project construction. 5D.10.5.7 Implementation Issues The installation and operation of a seawater desalination water treatment plant may have to address the following issues. TCEQ,2020. Surface Water Quality Viewer. Accessed online tceq.maps.arcgis.com January 13,2020. 5D.10-21 Coastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 r w HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] • Disposal of concentrated brine from desalination water treatment plant; • Permitting and constructing concentrate pipeline through seagrass beds and barrier island, including conforming with applicable laws and regulations including: o USACE permitting (including Section 404 Clean Waters Act and Section 10 Rivers & Harbors Act) o Endangered Species Act compliance and TPWD coordination, if required o Compliance with the Antiquities Code of Texas, the National Historic Preservation Act, and the Archeological and Historic Preservation. o TCEQ Water Right, TPDES, stormwater, and associated construction permits o Associated TCEQ registrations o Local land use and construction permits o GLO permitting requirements • Impact on the bays from removing water for consumptive use and altering existing power plant water rights permits; • Confirming that blending desalted seawater with other water sources in the municipal demand distribution system can be successfully accomplished; • High power requirements for desalination process dependent on large, reliable power source; • Skilled operators of desalination water treatment plants; • Permitting of a pipeline across rivers, highways, and private rural and urban property; and • Possibility of using design, build, operate contract for a desalination water treatment plant. 5D.10.5.8 Evaluation Summary An evaluation summary of this regional water management strategy is provided in Table 5D.10.7. 5D.10-22 FNCoastal Bend Regional Water Plan I October 2020 Coastal Bend Regional HDR-007003-10028677-275994-012 water Planning Group Seawater Desalination[31 TAC§357.34&§357.35] Table 5D.10.7. Evaluation Summary of the City of Corpus Christi's Inner Harbor and La Quinta Seawater Desalination Projects Impact Category Comment(s) a. Water supply: 1. Quantity 1. Project size: Inner Harbor: 11,201 ac-ft/yr)to 33,604 ac- ft/yr and La Quinta: 22,402 ac-ft/yr)to 44,804 ac-ft/yr 2. Reliability 2. Highly reliable quantity. 3. Cost of treated water 3. Cost for Inner Harbor: $2,555 to $3,218 and La Quinta $2,547 to$2,800 perac-ft. b. Environmental factors: 1. Instream flows 1. None or low impact. 2. Bay and estuary inflows and arms of the 2. Some environmental impact to estuary. Gulf of Mexico 3. Wildlife habitat 3. Some. Disposal of concentrated brine created from process may impact fish and wildlife habitats or wetlands. 4. Wetlands 4. Some. Disposal of concentrated brine created from process may impact fish and wildlife habitats or wetlands. 5. Threatened and endangered species 5. None identified. Endangered species survey will be needed to identify impacts. 6. Cultural resources 6. Cultural resources survey will be needed to identify any significant sites. 7. Water quality 7. a. dissolved solids 7a-b. Total dissolved solids and salinity of water is b. salinity removed with reverse osmosis treatment. Brine c. bacteria concentrate disposal issues will need to be d. chlorides evaluated. e. bromide 7c-i. Bacteria, chlorides, nitrate, alkalinity, ammonia, f. sulfate and copper were all identified as constituents of g. uranium concern for the Nueces Bay in the TCEQ and h. arsenic NRA Basin Highlights Report. Additional studies i. other water quality constituents regarding impacts on or as a result of project are needed. c. Impacts to agricultural resources and State None or low impacts on other water resources water resources Negligible impacts to agricultural resources d. Threats to agriculture and natural resources in Some.Temporary damage due to construction of pipeline region e. Recreational impacts None f. Equitable comparison of strategies Standard analyses and methods used for portions • Seawater desalination cost modeled after bid and manufacturers' budgets, but not constructed, comparable project g. Interbasin transfers Not applicable h. Third party social and economic impacts Not applicable i. Efficient use of existing water supplies and Provides regional opportunities regional opportunities j. Effect on navigation None k. Impacts to water pipelines and other facilities Construction and maintenance of transmission pipeline used for water conveyance corridor(in future). Possible impact to wildlife habitat along pipeline route and right-of-way. 5D.10-23 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Roadway Master Plan,, Land Use Assumption,, and Capital Improvements Plan 111111 ,1111 I I September 2023 1111 III ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas A61ILL Ur LUN i tiv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................3 Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan Elements...........................................................3 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................................................4 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS.................................................................................................................................5 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................7 ExistingVolumes.........................................................................................................................................8 Vehicle-Miles of Existing Capacity(Supply)...............................................................................................8 Vehicles-Miles of Existing Demand............................................................................................................8 Vehicles-Miles of Existing Excess Capacity and Deficiencies....................................................................9 GROWTH PROJECTIONS....................................................................................................................................11 Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand................................................................................................14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................................................15 EligibleProjects.........................................................................................................................................15 EligibleCosts..............................................................................................................................................15 ImpactFee CIP ..........................................................................................................................................17 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................................29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan Service Area Map......................................6 Figure 2.Typical Roadway Cross-Sections.......................................................................................................10 Figure 3. Overall Roadway Master Plan and CIP Projects...............................................................................20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Roadway Facility Vehicle-Mile Lane Capacities...................................................................................7 Table 2. Peak-Hour Vehicle-Miles of Capacity, Demand and Deficiencies.......................................................9 Table 3. 10 Year Growth Projections-Households.........................................................................................12 Table 4. 10 Year Growth Projections-Employees..........................................................................................12 Table 5. Residential and Non-Residential 10 Year Growth Projections(2021-2031)....................................13 Ilpape-dawson.com Isat pol 1231831001 TraKicl TraKicl WordlRoadway CIP Report1230919a 1.docxT 0C-I PAPE-DA WS O N rai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Table 6. Projection 10-Year Growth Projections by Service Area...................................................................14 Table 7.Vehicle-Miles of Demand and Capacity Added.................................................................................18 Table 8. Net Capacity Added and Projected 10-Year Growth.........................................................................19 Table 9. Capital Improvements Plan Project Listing by Service Area..............................................................21 'FNDICES Appendix A—Existing Roadway Inventory Appendix B—10 Year Projected Growth Appendix C—CIP Project List by Service Area Appendix D—Service Area Exhibits Appendix E—Opinion of Probable Costs by Project Ilpape-dawsonxom Isat pol 1231831001 TraKicl TraKicl WordlRoadway CIP Report1230919a 1.docxT OC-2 PAPE-DA WS O N ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas L,%L%.v v L a,w,v v�i�i'\i Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. was retained to prepare a Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) in support of the roadway impact fee program. Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Since 1987 Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for water, wastewater, roadway and drainage facilities. This study is the first study the City of Corpus Christi has developed for the roadway impact fee program to support new infrastructure for new growth. Impact Fees are meant to receive the costs of the impact of each new development which creates infrastructure needs. For Roadway impact fees,the infrastructure needs are additional capacity of arterial and collector roadways and intersections that serve the overall transportation system.The purpose of the Roadway Master Plan and CIP is to identify projects which are needed to serve the projected future development and establish a cost of the improvements. These projects are identified for the projected 10-year growth by service areas no larger than 6 miles is size. Then a separate Impact Fee Study could be performed to determine the cost for each development unit to fund these improvements in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report details how the service areas, land use assumptions, projected growth,and projects to support the 10 years of growth were developed.The service areas for Roadway Master Plan were developed using the city's ten (10)Area Development Plans (ADP) boundaries,which are existing adopted plans which are focused on community-sized areas of common characteristics and needs.The ADP areas were then broken down into 21 service areas within the City of Corpus City Boundaries in no more than 6mile areas per the Chapter 395 requirements. It should be noted that the service areas for the roadway master plan are different from the water, wastewater and stormwater master plans since the roadway master plan can only apply impact fees for roadways within the City of Corpus boundaries. The land uses and projected growth in each ADP area and subsequent roadway master plan service area were determined based on the city land use plan, census data, Corpus MPO projected growth and historical platting information provided by the City. From this data projected growth rates were determined for each ADP area and then applied to each associated service area based on the geographic Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 1 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas location. The total projected vehicle miles of demand from new vehicle trips are 135,966 vehicle miles over the next ten years. The capacity, demand, and existing deficiencies for each major arterial and collector roadway identified were determined by service area.The total amount of existing deficiencies for all service areas combined was 26,137 vehicle miles. Then a Capital Improvements program was developed to build out the overall roadway network which would add an additional 278,496 vehicle miles of capacity to the network. Then a calculation was performed to determine that approximately 49%of the projects are needed to support the projected 10-year growth. An estimated planning level opinion of probably costs was then projected for each project recommended in the CIP. The total project cost in the CIP is estimated at $1.5 Billion Dollars. The following sections provide a summary of the detail process in the development of the roadway master plan and associated capital improvements plan. Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 2 pq pE-DAWSON ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas I 1L I i)~v W .I I W I'v Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. was retained to prepare a Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan for the City of Corpus Christi.Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. The Legislative mandate requires that a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) be prepared that addresses long-term growth and that such plan be approved by the governing body prior to a public hearing for the consideration of imposing an impact fee. This report details the development of the impact fee CIP. As a funding mechanism for roadway improvements, impact fees allow cities to recover the costs associated with new facilities or expansions in order to serve future development. Legislatively, roadway impact fees may consider arterial and collector status roads on the City's official Transportation Plan. Requirements mandate that impact fees be based on a specific list of improvements identified in the Capital Improvement Plan program and only the cost attributed (and necessitated) by new growth over a ten-year period may be considered. As projects identified in the CIP are completed, planned costs are updated with actual costs to more accurately reflect the capital expenditure of the program.Additionally, new capital improvement projects may be added to the program. Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan Elements This report contains the follow components: • Methodology — Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the capital improvements plan. • Service Area Structure - Explanation and division of the city into impact fee service areas for roadway facilities. • Existing Conditions Analysis - Analysis of the existing roadway system; its carrying capacity, current utilization, and deficiencies. • Growth Projections - Development of growth projections to occur over the ten-year planning period by service area. • Capital Improvements Plans- Description and list of the capital improvements plan and costing. Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 3 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas The Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is predicated on community growth forecasted over a ten-year planning period. The Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Report, prepared as part of this study process,serves as the basis for the determination of"growth attributable to new development". The LUA examines growth in terms of population and employment and are based on recent trends the city has experienced since the early 2000s and reflect the changing dynamics of residential and non- residential growth in the city along with the information assessed from the Corpus Christi MPO study which had a projected population and employment. Information contained in the report is based upon analysis of data from the U.S. Census, regional and local growth trends, housing permits and known/anticipated development from recent city approvals, and City MPO data. These land use assumptions serve as a key component from which impact fees are calculated. For the formulation of the capital improvements plan, a series of work tasks were undertaken and are described below. 1. Meetings were held with City Staff to discuss impact fee methodology, project criteria and eligibility, and cost eligibility for consideration in the study. 2. Roadway service areas were developed to ensure conformity with legislative mandate, as well as amended to allow for city annexations. 3. Vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) in the PM peak hour was identified as the service unit of measure for analyses and impact fee calculations. 4. A roadway inventory was conducted to document lane geometrics, roadway functional classification, and system capacity. Traffic volume count data were obtained from the city of Corpus Christi Urban Counts data 2016, and the TxDOT Traffic Count Database System in 2019 to determine roadway utilization, and if any capacity deficiencies exist within each service area. 5. Projected 10-year growth was calculated for service areas based on land use assumptions(projections of population and employment growth) and translated into residential, office, commercial and industrial VMT using service unit equivalencies. Trip rate data was obtained from Trip Generation, Tenth Edition by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and trip length statistics for Corpus Christi were obtained from the National Household Travel Survey data. 6. A capital improvements plan to address projected growth was developed and separated by service area. Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReport1230919a1.docx 4 pq pE-DAWSON ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas KUHUVVA* JtKVILL AKLAb To develop the service areas the City of Corpus Area Development (ADP) plan boundaries were utilized which includes a community sized area of common characteristics and needs. The City current has 10 adopted service area plans both within the City Boundaries and Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Service areas are required by State Law to define an area to be served by capital improvements plan and potential roadway impact fee. Legislative requirements stipulate that roadway service areas be limited to a six-mile maximum and must be located within the current city limits. Therefore, the ADP areas were broken up into smaller service areas to meet this requirement. The result is that, for roadways, new development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital improvements within that service area and within city limits. Since the City Boundaries were continuous being updated throughout the master plan development due to voluntary annexations within the London area the City boundaries as of January 2023 were utilized in the study and service area boundaries. It is anticipated in the future when the study is updated per State Law that the service area boundaries could be updated to reflect the new city limits at that time. The service area structure consisting of twenty-one(21)zones was developed for the City of Corpus Christi and correlates with the current corporate boundaries (as of January 2023), as shown in Figure 1. Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx rJ pq pE-DAWSON raj ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Figure 1. Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan Service Area Map .M, i 1! Q 1� PAP 3 _ II ' p s �a s• . I 'e kI �99 8ei E- SON SERVICE AREAS ENGINEERS CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS p J I¢ Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 6 PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas V/\IJIIILV 4VILVIIIV ILJ /'11 L/'1V�JIJ An inventory of major roadways that are designated as arterial and/or collector facilities on the City of Corpus Urban Transportation Plan was conducted to determine: 1) capacity provided by the existing roadway system, 2) the demand currently placed on the system, and 3) the potential existence of deficiencies on the system. Any deficiencies found to occur will be carried over in the impact fee calculations (netting out capacity made available by the CIP). Data for the inventory was obtained from the Master Thoroughfare Plan, traffic volume count data. The roadways were divided into segments based on changes on the transportation plan roadway intersections, city limits or roadway service areas that may influence roadway characteristics. For the assessment of individual segments, lane capacities were assigned to each segment based on roadway functional class defined by the Urban Transportation Plan and Infrastructure Design Manual and type of existing cross-section, as listed in Table 1. It should be noted that the City's Infrastructure Design Manual (IDM) was updated and finalized in December 2022. As part the updated the street classifications and allowable average daily traffic (ADT) volumes were revised to allow additional vehicles on each roadway type. This change was made based on a review of other similar cities in Texas. The roadway capacities utilized in this study reflect the updated ADT presented in the IDM. Roadway hourly volume capacities are based on general carrying capacity values and reflect level-of-service (LOS) "D" operation based upon generally accepted capacities as defined in Highway Capacity Manual references, which has been identified as the minimum acceptable traffic operational condition by the city. Table 1. Roadway Facility Vehicle-Mile Lane Capacities Roadway Facility Designation Daily Roadway Hourly Vehicle-mile Capacity per Volumes(ADT) Lane Mile of Roadway Facility Minor Residential Collector C1 4,000-8,000 360 Secondary Collector C2 8,000-10,000 300 Primary Collector C3 10,000-14,000 315 Parkway Collector P1 4,000-8,000 360 Minor Arterial Undivided Al 15,000-24,000 540 Secondary Arterial Divided A2 20,000-32,000 720 Primary Arterial - Divided A3 30,000-48,000 720 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 7 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Roadway Facility Designation Daily Roadway Hourly Vehicle-mile Capacity per Volumes(ADT) Lane Mile of Roadway Facility Minor Rural Arterial (RAI) RAI 10,000-15,000 675 Secondary Rural (RA2) RA2 15,000-25,000 563 Primary Rural Arterial (RA3) RA3 25,000-35,000 788 Existing Volumes Existing directional peak hour volumes were obtained from the Corpus Christi Urban Counts (2016) and the TxDOT TCDS data (2019 & 2020), which were then grown using the growth rate for the year 2021 For segments not counted, existing volumes were used or estimates were developed based on data from adjoining roadway counts. This data was compiled for roadway each segment throughout the city and entered into the database for use in calculations. A summary of volumes by roadway segment is included in Appendix A as part of the existing inventory data. Vehicle-Miles of Existing Capacity (Supply) An analysis of the total capacity for each service area was performed. The capacities were determined based on the updated IDM capacities and peak hour capacity shown in Table 1. For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle-miles of capacity supplied were calculated using the following: Vehicle-Miles of Capacity=Link capacity per hour per lane x No. of Lanes x Length of segment(miles)x Percentage of the segment in service area A summary of the current capacity available on the roadway system by service area is detailed below. Vehicles-Miles of Existing Demand The level of current usage in terms of vehicle-miles was calculated for each arterial and collector roadway segment. The vehicle- miles of existing demand were calculated by the following equation: Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 8 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Vehicle-Miles of Demand = PM peak hour volume x Length of segment (miles) x Percentage of the segment in service area The total vehicle-miles of demand by service area are included in Table 2 and the detailed calculations by street segment are included in Appendix A. Vehicles-Miles of Existing Excess Capacity and Deficiencies For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle-miles of excess capacity and/or deficiencies were calculated and are listed in Table 2. Each segment was evaluated to determine if vehicle demands exceeded the available roadway capacity. If demand exceeded capacity in segments, the deficiency is deducted from the supply associated with the capital improvement plan.A summary of peak hour excess capacity and deficiencies is also shown in the table. Any deficiencies identified under current operations will be carried over to the impact fee calculation. A detailed listing of existing excess capacity and deficiencies by roadway segment is also located in Appendix A. Table 2. Peak-Hour Vehicle-Miles of Capacity, Demand and Deficiencies Service Area Capacity Demand Excess Existing Capacity Deficiencies 1 Northwest 1 11,376 12,759 (1,384) 4,277 2 Northwest 2 18,586 8,511 8,382 100 3 Northwest 3 17,014 6,238 9,905 228 4 CC Airport 1 25,214 3,726 21,488 - 5 CC Airport 2 3,679 912 2,768 35 6 Westside 1 62,026 24,057 35,948 25 7 Westside 2 12,080 3,212 7,034 - 8 Downtown 33,818 8,692 25,126 84 9 Bayside 1 74,696 52,443 22,253 2,690 10 Bayside 2 33,732 22,723 11,009 1,924 11 Southside 1 31,631 18,021 9,309 376 12 Southside 2 55,036 38,010 17,026 4,829 13 Southside 4 23,555 11,382 12,173 849 14 Southside 3 16,469 17,263 (794) 5,211 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 9 pq pE-DAWSON raj ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Service Area Capacity Demand Excess Existing Capacity Deficiencies 15 London Area 4,354 1,353 792 - 16 Flour Bluff 1 8,299 9,720 (2,247) 3,265 17 Flour Bluff 2 8,691 7,329 394 2,046 18 Padre Island 1 5,359 3,314 2,045 - 19 Padre Island 2 6,765 4,373 2,392 - 20 Padre Island 3 5,253 4,076 1,178 83 21 Padre Island 4 17,520 6,808 10,712 115 Total 475,153 264,922 195,509 26,137 The roadway typical sections which match each roadway designation included in the infrastructure design manual and referenced in the master plan tables are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2.Typical Roadway Cross-Sections (Cl) COLLECTOR CZ SECONDARY COLLECTOR T., I■■ mIU aloft C3 PRIMARY COLLECTOR P1 PARKWAY COLLECTOR miw c" Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 10 PAPE-DAWSON raj ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Al MINOR ARTERIAL UNDIVIDED I [A2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL DIVIDED Ap♦r n d f ^i A3 PRIMARY ARTERIAL DIVIDED Al MINOR ARTERIAL UNDIVIDED A2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL DIVIDED aon A3 PRIMARY ARTERIAL DIVIDED 130 -+.- stmatmiz Note:Cross section figures are representative for each street classification.There may be other allowable options within the required pavement for each street.Please refer to the latest Infrastructure Design Manual(IDM)for the requirements of each street. GROWTH PROJECTIONS The projected growth for the roadway service area is represented by the increase in the number of new vehicle-miles of demand generated over the 10-year planning period.The basis for the calculation of new demand is the population and employment projections that were prepared as part of the City of Corpus Christi Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Memo dated July 13, 2023, by Pape Dawson Engineers with a growth rates approved by the Corpus Christi CIAC Committee on July 20, 2023. Estimates of population by households and employment were prepared for the years 2021 and 2031 utilizing Corpus MPO model, Historical Growth, and building permit and platting information from the City. Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReport1230919a1.docx 11 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Population data was provided in terms of the number of dwelling units. Employment data was broken into three classes that include basic, retail, and service, comprising a variety of employment groupings and are presented in thousand square foot area of building space using estimates of square footage per employee. Basic employment generally encompasses the industrial and manufacturing uses; retail employment includes commercial and retail uses; and service employment generally encompasses government and office uses. A summary of the projected growth is summarized below in Table 3 and 4. Table 3.10 Year Growth Projections-Households ADP 2021 Households 2031 Households 2031 Less 2021 Annual Growth in households CC Airport 1,582 2,228 646 3.5% Downtown 3,794 4,919 1,124 2.6% Flour Bluff 8,006 8,573 567 0.7% Bayside 31,508 32,478 970 0.3% Northwest 12,152 15,194 3,042 2.3% Padre/Mustang Island 5,987 7,295 1,307 2.0% Southside 41,601 47,130 5,529 1.3% Westside 18,533 19,978 1,445 0.8% London 1,100 6,913 2,073 6.5% Calallen 1,310 2,201 891 5.3% Tota 1 125,573 146,909 17,594 1.3% Table 4. 10 Year Growth Projections-Employees ADP 2021 Households 2031 Households 2031 Less 2021 Annual Growth in households CC Airport 8,927 10,755 1,828 1.9% Downtown 17,328 17,450 122 0.1% Flour Bluff 11,725 12,077 352 0.3% Bayside 25,887 26,342 455 0.2% Northwest 11,536 13,307 1,771 1.4% Padre/Mustang Island 2,666 3,431 765 2.6% Southside 26,898 30,226 3,328 1.2% Westside 31,253 33,767 2,514 0.8% London 423 732 309 5.6% Calallen 3,502 4,093 591 1.6% Tota 1 142,214 155,164 12,950 0.9% Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 12 PAPE-DAWSON Pi ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas The land use data was further broken down by service areas based on single family and other residential categories and the non-residential land uses including basic, service, and retail type land use to estimate the peak hour trips.Table 5 shows the projected 10-years of development by service area for each of the five land use categories. For Service areas 4 and 5, CC Airport 1 and CC Airport 2,the single family homes projected was reduced to zero over the next ten years based on feedback from the Capital improvements Advisory Committee and City Staff due to the Corpus Christi Airport Overlay District which limits the amount of new homes that could be constructed near the airport hazard areas. Table 5.Residential and Non-Residential 10 Year Growth Projections(2021-2031) Residential Non-Residential Single-Family Multi- Basic Service Retail Service Area (DU) Family (sqft) (sqft) (sqft) (DU) 1 Northwest 1 844 82 105,000 80,000 73,000 2 Northwest 2 1,111 107 14,000 120,000 81,500 3 Northwest 3 1,291 125 158,000 163,000 81,000 4 CC Airport 1 0 42 554,000 174,000 25,000 5 CC Airport 2 0 29 257,000 102,500 10,000 6 Westside 1 481 86 450,000 213,000 110,000 7 Westside 2 1969 353 125,000 175,000 213,000 8 Downtown 850 1,149 11,000 333,000 57,000 9 Bayside 1 51 10 19,000 89,000 80,000 10 Bayside 2 1,750 326 - - 162,000 11 Southside 1 461 129 90,000 190,000 153,000 12 Southside 2 473 129 21,000 310,000 358,000 13 Southside 4 1855 517 44,500 79,500 98,800 14 Southside 3 2398 669 21,000 222,000 136,000 15 London Area 1250 1450 - 12,000 15,000 16 Flour Bluff 1 256 47 34,000 29,000 256,000 17 Flour Bluff 2 226 41 4,000 - 3,400 18 Padre Island 1 189 47 2,000 16,000 1,000 19 Padre Island 2 - - 2,000 16,000 1,000 20 Padre Island 3 62 15 2,000 16,000 27,000 21 Padre Island 4 939 232 10,500 108,000 96,000 Total 16,456 5,585 1,924,000 2,448,000 2,037,700 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 13 1 PAPE-DAWSO Pi ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand Projected vehicle-miles of demand were calculated based on the net growth expected to occur over the 10-year planning period, and on the associated service unit generation for each of the population and employment data components (basic, service and retail). Separate calculations were performed for each land use and were then aggregated for each service area. Vehicle-miles of demand for population growth were based on dwelling units (residential). Vehicle-miles of demand for employment were based on the square footage of building space using estimates of square footage per employee for industrial, office, and retail uses. Trip estimates were made used Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 101h edition which is considered and industry standard for estimating trips. The 10-year projected vehicle-miles of demand by service area are summarized in Table 6. Appendix B details the projected demand calculations for each service area. Table 6.Projection 10-Year Growth Projections by Service Area Service Area Service Area Name Projected 10-Year Growth (Vehicle-Miles) 1 Northwest 1 5,388 2 Northwest 2 6,628 3 Northwest 3 8,230 4 CC Airport 1 2,850 5 CC Airport 2 1,414 6 Westside 1 5,519 7 Westside 2 12,685 8 Downtown 8,270 9 Bayside 1 1,070 10 Bayside 2 10,197 11 Southside 1 4,352 12 Southside 2 21,798 13 Southside 4 11,268 14 Southside 3 14,899 15 London Area 9,487 16 Flour Bluff 1 2,886 17 Flour Bluff 2 1,238 18 Padre Island 1 1,107 19 Padre Island 2 71 20 Padre Island 3 540 21 Padre Island 4 6,069 Tota 1 135,966 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 14 PAPE-DAWSON Pi ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas c.Hri iAL uv II r*UVLMOM i rLAu`m The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is aimed at facilitating long-term growth in Corpus Christi. The City has identified the City- funded transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City.The CIP for the Roadway Master Plan is made up of: • Recently completed projects with excess capacity available to serve new growth; • Projects currently under construction; and • Remaining projects needed to complete the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. All arterial and collector facilities in the currently adopted City's Urban Transportation Plan to the ultimate build-out were included in the CIP to provide flexibility in the development of the community due to current rates of development. A separate report on the development of the Roadway impact fee CIP, the final report will detail project cost per service unit, the cost attributable to new development, and service area cost per service unit. Eligible Projects Legislative mandate stipulates that the impact fee CIP contain only those roadways which are included on the City's official Master Thoroughfare Plan that are classified as arterial or collector status facilities. Impact fee legislation also allows for the recoupment of costs for previously constructed facilities and projects currently under construction; however, after consideration, none of the projects were included for recoupment. All these projects conform to the Master Thoroughfare Plan requirements and will consider only the costs incurred by the City for facility implementation. Eligible Costs In general,those costs associated with the design, right-of-way acquisition,and construction and financing of all items necessary to implement the roadway projects identified in the capital improvements plan are eligible. These estimates are based on the ultimate roadway section identified by functional classification in the Urban Transportation Plan with an excerpt of these assumed sections in the Appendix D. It is important to note that upon completion of the capital improvements identified in the CIP, the city must recalculate the impact fee using the actual costs and make refunds if the actual cost is less than the impact Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 15 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas fee paid by greater than 10 percent.To prevent this situation,conservative(low)estimates of project cost are considered. Chapter 395.012 identifies roadway costs eligible for impact fee recovery.The law states that: "An impact fee may be imposed only to pay the cost of constructing capital improvements for facility expansions, including and limited to the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees; and fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." "Projected interest charges and other finance costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the political subdivision to finance the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan and are not used to reimburse bond funds expended for facilities that are not identified in the capital improvements plan." The following details the individual cost components of the impact fee CIP. • Construction: Construction costs include those costs which are normally associated with construction, including: paving, dirt work (including sub-grade preparation, embankment fill and excavation), clearing and grubbing, retaining walls or other slope protection measures, and general drainage items which are necessary in order to build the roadway and allow the roadway to fulfill its vehicle carrying capability. Individual items may include; bridges, culverts, inlets and storm sewers, junction boxes, manholes, curbs and/or gutters, and channel linings and other erosion protection appurtenances.Other items included in cost estimates may include:sidewalks, traffic control devices at select locations (initial cost only), ancillary adjustments to existing utilities, and minimal sodding/landscaping. • Engineering:These are the costs associated with the design and surveying necessary to construct the roadway. Because the law specifically references fees, it has generally been understood that in-house City design and surveying cannot be included. Only those services that are contracted out can be included and it may be necessary to use outside design and surveying firms to perform the work. For planned projects, a percentage based on typical engineering contracts was used to estimate these fees. Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 16 pq pE-DAWSON ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas • Right-of-Way:Any land acquisition cost estimated to be necessary to construct a roadway can be included in the cost estimate. For planning purposes, only the additional amount of land needed to bring a roadway right-of-way to thoroughfare standard was considered. For example, if a 120' right-of-way for an arterial road was needed and 80' of right-of-way currently existed, only 40' would be considered in the acquisition cost.The cost for right-of-way may vary based on location of project and will be based on data from the most current County Appraisal District data. • Debt Service: Predicted interest charges and finance costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principle and interest on bonds, notes,or other obligations issued by the city to finance capital improvements identified in the impact fee capital improvements plans. They cannot be used to reimburse bond funds for other facilities.This cost will be determined through a Finance Study and incorporated in the final impact fee cost per service unit calculation. • Previous Assessments: The cost for any previous assessments collected by the City on projects identified on the impact fee CIP must be removed from program consideration. As this is a new impact fee program, there are no previous assessments to consider in the initial calculation. • Study Updates: The fees paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision can be included in the impact fees. Only the cost necessitated by new development will be included for impact fee consideration. For example, if only 20%of the capacity provided by the impact fee CIP is needed over the ten-year window, then only 20% of the cost associated with those facilities will be considered. This can be seen in Service Area 1 as another example,where net capacity supplied by the CIP is 11,695 vehicle-miles(Table 7)while the projected demand is 5,338 vehicle-miles (Table 6). Therefore, only the portion of cost attributed to the projected demand,46%, would be considered in the impact fee cost per service unit calculation in the next phase of the study's Impact Fee Report.This calculation is shown for each service area in Table 8. Impact Fee CIP The proposed CIP consists of 483 project segments over the twenty-one service areas and entail the buildout of the full transportation plan network, as seen in Figure 2. By including the full network, there is flexibility in the impact fee program funds to adapt to development needs and ensure credit is given to Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 17 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas developers building thoroughfare roadways. The capacity and net capacity provided by the proposed CIP is summarized below in Table 7. Net capacity provided by the proposed CIP takes into consideration current traffic on CIP roads and any deficiencies from the existing conditions analysis described in Existing Condition Analysis Section of this report. A detailed listing by project of capacity supplied can be found in the Appendix C. Table 7.Vehicle-Miles of Demand and Capacity Added A B C D=A-B-C Total VEH-MI of Total VEH-MI Total VEH-MI of Net Amount of Service Area Capacity added by the of Existing Existing VEH-MI of Roadway Impact Fee Demand Deficiencies Capacity Added 1 22,970 6,998 4,277 11,695 2 21,252 1,894 100 19,258 3 45,429 2,908 228 42,293 4 32,481 1,563 - 30,918 5 15,941 846 35 15,060 6 18,248 4,254 25 13,969 7 33,169 1,945 - 31,224 8 4,113 272 84 3,757 9 13,022 5,959 2,690 4,373 10 7,884 1,713 1,924 4,247 11 14,080 4,110 376 9,594 12 21,798 10,279 4,829 6,690 13 30,257 7,549 849 21,859 14 27,053 7,016 5,211 14,826 15 7,464 - - 7,464 16 9,504 3,746 3,265 2,493 17 19,924 4,943 2,046 12,935 18 12,367 2,311 - 10,056 19 14,676 4,369 - 10,307 20 6,168 1,463 83 4,622 21 971 - 115 856 Total 378,771 74,138 26,137 278,496 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPReportl230919al.docx 18 PAPE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas A comparison of net capacity provided by the proposed CIP relative to 10-year needs (developed in the Growth Projections section) is listed below in Table 8.An analysis reveals an adequately matched overall impact fee CIP program to address growth attributable to new development. Table 8. Net Capacity Added and Projected 10-Year Growth B/A A B (Max 100%) Service Net Amount of VEH-MI Projected 10-Year Growth Area of Capacity Added (Vehicle-Miles) 1 11,695 5,388 46% 2 19,258 6,628 34% 3 42,293 8,230 19% 4 30,918 2,850 9% 5 15,060 1,414 9% 6 13,969 5,519 40% 7 31,224 12,685 41% 8 3,757 8,270 100% 9 4,373 1,070 24% 10 4,247 10,197 100% 11 9,594 4,352 45% 12 6,690 21,798 100% 13 21,859 11,268 52% 14 14,826 14,899 100% 15 7,464 9,487 100% 16 2,493 2,886 100% 17 12,935 1,238 10% 18 10,056 1,107 11% 19 10,307 71 1% 20 4,622 540 12% 21 856 6,069 100% Total 278,496 135,966 49% Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 19 pq pE-DAWSON Fai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Figure 3.Overall Roadway Master Plan and CIP Projects i z . .. z z z i i i . i z a 1 - 3 !F w • , fJ J / r 4 SERME AREA PROJECTS PAWNER SON I CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS ENGINEERS 0 • - IMPACT FEE STUDY Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReportl230919a1.docx 20 PAPE-DAWSON rai ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project costs were developed based on unit cost estimates compiled by Pape Dawson Engineers. Individual project costs were developed for engineering, right-of-way, and construction. Each roadway segment uses the Master Thoroughfare Plan's defined functional classification to determine the ultimate roadway standard for each link.Additionally, impact fee study update costs were attributed to the project costs. For recently completed projects, actual costs must be input to meet legislative mandates, but no completed projects were included in this initial impact fee program. The cost for the preliminary CIP program totals approximately$1.5 billon, excluding debt service. Debt service costs will be determined in the Finance Study as part of the cost per service unit calculation analysis. Figure 2 and Table 9 illustrate and list the capital improvement projects and their associated total cost for the impact fee program. Detailed project lists, exhibits, and opinion of probable costs are shown in Appendix C-E for each service area. Table 9.Capital Improvements Plan Project Listing by Service Area NORTHWEST 1(SERVICE AREA 1)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length From To Designation Lanes Service in Service Area 1-A FM 1889 Northwest Blvd 765'N of Lake Grande Ave 0.40 A2 4 100% $ 4,032,000.00 1-B FM 1889 765'N of Lake Grande Ave Lake Grande Ave 0.13 A2 4 100% $ 1,288,000.00 1-C FM 1889 Lake Grande Ave 294'S of Valley View Dr 0.10 A2 4 100% $ 1,002,000.00 1-D CR 69 Northwest Blvd 1690'S of Northwest Blvd 0.32 Al 4 100% $ 2820,000.00 1-E CR 69 1690'S of Northwest Blvd CR 52 0.28 Al 4 100% $ 2,118,000.00 1-F Northwest Blvd 1644'W of Wright Moravek Rd Wright Moravek Rd 0.31 A3 6 100% $ 3,988,000.00 1-G Northwest Blvd Wright Moravek Rd River Trail St 0.40 A3 6 100% $ 5,105,000.00 1-H Northwest Blvd River Trail St ERiverview Dr 0.41 A3 6 100% $ 5,206,000.00 1-1 Northwest Blvd E Riverview Dr Wood River Rd 0.17 A3 6 100% $ 2,232,000.00 1-J Northwest Blvd Wood River Rd Trinity River Dr/FM 1889 0.12 A3 6 100% $ 1,570,000.00 1-K Northwest Blvd Trinity River Dr/FM 1889 River Hill Dr 0.43 A3 6 100% $ 5,507,000.00 1-L Northwest Blvd River Hill Dr CR 69 0.42 A3 6 100% $ 5,378,000.00 1-M Northwest Blvd CR 69 Riverside Blvd 0.27 A3 6 100% $ 3p58,000.00 1-N Northwest Blvd Riverside Blvd River E Dr 0.16 A3 6 100% $ 2,049,000.00 1-0 CR 52 570'E of Emory Dr Emory Dr 0.10 Al 4 100% $ 757,000.00 1-P CR 52 Emory Dr IH 69E 0.78 Al 4 100% $ 6,595,000.00 1-Q CR 52 IH 69E 1145'W of IH 69E 0.22 Al 4 50% $ 832,500.00 1-R Loma Alta Rd Leopard St 2057'S of Leopard St 0.39 Cl 2 100% $ 1,933,000.00 a 1-S Loma Alta Rd 2057'S of Leopard St Hearn Rd 0.26 Cl 2 100% $ 1,291,000.00 'Z 1-U Callicoatte Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.11 A3 6 50% $ 675,500.00 _ 1-V Callicoatte Rd Leopard St HearnRd 0.48 A3 6 50% $ 3,067,000.00 1-W Callicoatte Rd HearnRd 2350'S of Hearn rd 0.44 A3 6 50% $ 2,832,000.00 3 1-X Callicoatte Rd 2350'S of Hearn rd 4060'S of Hearn Rd 0.33 A3 6 50% $ 2,113,500.00 Y 1-Y Wright Moravek Rd Northwest Blvd 1675'S of Northwest Blvd 0.32 A2 4 100% $ 3,222,000.00 Z 1-Z Wright Moravek Rd 1675'S of Northwest Blvd 2245'S of Northwest Blvd 0.10 A2 4 100% $ 1,008,000.00 1-AA Lake Athens Ave W River Dr 2190'W of W River Dr 0.41 Cl 2 100% $ 2,034,000.00 1-AB Lake Athens Ave 2190'W of W River Dr Wright Moravek Rd 0.40 Cl 2 100% $ 1,985,000.00 1-AC Lake Athens Ave 1975'W of Wright Movarek Rd Wright Moravek Rd 0.36 Cl 2 100% $ 1,786,000.00 1-AD Riverside Blvd 347'S of River Rock Dr City Limits 0.26 Cl 2 100% $ 1,291,000.00 1-AE River Trail Dr Northwest Blvd 2052'S of Northwest Blvd 0.39 Cl 2 100% $ 1,929,000.00 1-AF River Trail Dr 2052'S of Northwest Blvd 3650'S of Northwest Blvd 0.30 Cl 2 100% $ 1p89,000.00 1-AG River Trail Dr 3650'S of Northwest Blvd City Limits 0.13 Cl 2 100% $ 645,000.00 1-AH Amanda Lane Wright Moravek Rd 2115'E of Wnght Movarek Rd 0.40 A2 4 100% $ 4,027,000.00 1-AI Amanda Lane 2115'E of Wnght Movarek Rd 2975'E of Wnght Movarek Rd 0.14 A2 4 100% $ 1p51,000.00 1-Al East Riverview St Northwest Blvd Lake Athens Ave 0.40 Cl 2 100% $ 1,985,000.00 1-AK East Riverview St Lake Athens Ave 221'S of Lake Athens Ave 0.04 Cl $ 199,000.00 1-AL River Hill Dr Northwest Blvd City Limits 0.62 Cl $ 3,783,000.00 1-AM 1-AM CR 69 1400'E of CR 69 0.27 Cl $ 1,340,000.00 1-AN 1-AN 1400'E of CR 69 3105'E of CR 69 0.32 Cl E21100% $ 1,588,000.00 1-AQ Wildcat Dr 1750'S of Northwest Blvd City Limits 0.27 Cl $ 1,343,000.00 1-AR Emory Dr IH 69E 4230'E of IH 69E 0.82 Cl $ 4,763,000.00 $ 101,317,500.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPRepoftl230919al.docx 21 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas NORTHWEST 2(SERVICE AREA 2)PROJECT LIST LimitsMTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway From To Length Desi Lanes Service in Service Area 2-A Haven Dr New PR Roadway Warrior Dr 0.39 A2 4 100% $ 3,886,000.00 2-B Haven Dr Warrior Dr Mc Kinzie Rd 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,729,000.00 2-D Callicoatte Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.11 A3 6 50% $ 675,500.00 2-E Callicoatte Rd Leopard St Hearn Rd 0.48 A3 6 50% $ 3,067,000.00 2-F Callicoatte Rd Hearn Rd 2350'S of Hearn rd 0.44 A3 6 50% $ 2,832,000.00 2-G Callicoatte Rd 2350'S of Hearn rd 4060'S of Hearn Rd 0.33 A3 6 50% $ 2,113,500.00 2-H Mckinzie Rd IH-37 Up River Rd 0.07 A2 4 100% $ 705,000.00 2-I Mckinzie Rd Up River Rd Creek View Dr 0.18 A2 4 100% $ 1,813,000.00 2-1 Mckinzie Rd Creek View Dr Leopard St 0.30 A2 4 50% $ 1,510,000.00 2-K Mckinzie Rd Leopard St Frontier Dr 0.34 A2 4 50% $ 1,711,500.00 2-L Mckinzie Rd Frontier Dr Haven Dr 0.42 A2 4 50% $ 2,114,000.00 2-M Mckinzie Rd Haven Dr PR E-W Segment 1 0.50 A3 6 50% $ 3,549,500.00 2-N Mckinzie Rd PR E-W Segment 1 PR E-W Segment 2 0.50 A3 6 50% $ 3,549,500.00 2-0 Mckinzie Rd PR E-W Segment 2 City Limits 0.55 A3 6 50% $ 3,869,500.00 2-P PR Segment Violet Rd Widgeon Dr(N-S PR Segment) 0.43 Cl 2 100% $ 2,184,000.00 2-Q PR E-W Segment 1 Widgeon Dr(N-S PR Segment) New PR Segment 0.44 Cl 2 100% $ 1,688,000.00 v 2-R PRE-W Segment New PR Segment Warrior(PR N-S Segment) 0.34 Cl 2 100% $ 3,673,000.00 'Z 2-S PRE-W Segment Warrior(PR N-S Segment) Mc Kinzie Rd 0.60 Cl 2 100% $ 3,625,000.00 _ 2-T PR E-W Segment 2 City Limits New PR Segment 0.36 A2 4 100% $ 3,423,000.00 2-U PRE-W Segment New PR Segment Warrior(PR N-S Segment) 0.34 A2 4 100% $ 7,743,000.00 3 2-V PRE-W Segment Warrior(PR N-S Segment) Mc Kinzie Rd 0.70 A2 4 100% $ 149,000.00 C 2-W Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) Yellow Oak Ave(Constructed Section) Stadite Ln(PR E-W Segment) 0.03 Cl 2 100% $ 1,538,000.00 Z 2-X Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) Stadite Ln(PR E-W Segment) City Limits 0.31 Cl 2 100% $ 1,538,000.00 2-Y PR N-S Segment 1 Stadite Ln(PR E-W Segment) PR E-W Segment 3 0.31 Cl 2 100% $ 249,000.00 2-Z PR N-S Segment 1 PR E-W Segment 3 City Limits 0.05 Cl 2 100% $ 249,000.00 2-AA Widgeon Dr(PR Segment) Widgeon Dr(Constructed Segment) PR E-W Segment 1 0.05 C12 100% $ 1,340,000.00 2-AB Widgeon Dr(PR Segment) PRE-W Segment City Limits 0.27 Cl 2 100% $ 3,177,000.00 2-AE Sunny Dr(PR Segment) PR E-W Segment 1 PR E-W Segment 2 0.33 Cl 2 100% $ 1,637,000.00 2-AF Hearn Rd(PR Segment) 100'E Dunstain St Woodland Creek Dr 0.32 Cl 2 100% $ 1,588,000.00 2-AG Stadite Ln(PR Segment) Callicoatte Rd Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) 0.41 Cl 2 100% $ 2,034,000.00 2-AH Stadite Ln(PR Segment) Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) Proposed N-S Segment 0.47 Cl 2 100% $ 2,332,000.00 2-AI StaditeLn(PRSegment) Proposed N-S Segment Violet Rd 0.24 Cl 2 100% $ 1,190,000.00 2-AJ Warrior(P R Segment) Haven Dr PRE-W Segment1 0.25 Cl 2 100% $ 1,241,000.00 2-AK Warrior(PR Segment) PRE-W Segment PRE-W Segment2 0.36 Cl 2 100% $ 1,786,000.00 2-AL Yellow Oak Ave(PR Segment) Dunstain Rd Sandy Hollow Creek Dr 0.62 Cl 2 100% $ 3,783,000.00 2-AM PR E-W Segment 3 CRy Limits Proposed N-S Segment 0.20 A2 4 100% $ 2,014,000.00 2-AN PRE-W Segment Proposed N-S Segment Violet Rd 0.35 A2 4 100% $ 3,524,000.00 $ 90,963,000.00 NORTHWEST 3(SERVICE AREA 3)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway Limits Length MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost From To Designati Lanes Service in Service Area 3-A Up River Rd,N of IH 37 Rand Morgan Rd 1425'W of N Clarkwood Rd 0.48 C3 4 100% $ 3,084,000.00 3-B Rand Morgan Rd Up River Rd,140'N of IH 37 IH 37 0.03 C3 4 100% $ 173,000.00 3-C Rand Morgan Rd IH 37 Up River Rd,180'Sof IH 37 0.03 A2 4 100% $ 344,000.00 3-D Rand Morgan Rd Up River Rd,180'Sof IH 37 Leopard St 0.56 A2 4 100% $ 6,350,000.00 3-E Rand Morgan Rd Leopard St Oregon Td 0.44 A2 4 100% $ 4,478,000.00 3-F lRand Morgan Rd Oregon Td 1540'Sof McNorton Rd 0.69 A2 4 100% $ 7,642,000.00 3-G Rand Morgan Rd 1540'SofMcNorton Rd 3565'Sof McNorton Rd 0.38 A2 4 100% $ 3,825,000.00 3-H Rand Morgan Rd 3565'Sof Mc No rton Rd 4785'Sof McNorton Rd 0.23 A2 4 100% $ 2,316,000.00 3-I Rand Morgan Rd 4785'Sof McNorton Rd 2650'N of Agnes St 0.60 A2 4 100% $ 6,737,000.00 3-J Rand Morgan Rd 2650'N of Agnes St Agnes St 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,729,000.00 3-K N Clarkwood Rd Leopard St 3260'N of Sedwick Rd 0.80 A3 6 50% $ 5,470,000.00 3-L N Clarkwood Rd 3260'N of Sedwick Rd Sedwick Rd 0.62 A3 6 50% $ 4,317,500.00 3-M N Clarkwood Rd Sedwick Rd Alpine St 0.51 A3 6 50% $ 3,613,500.00 3-N N Clarkwood Rd Alpine St 1070'Sof Alpine St 0.20 A3 6 50% $ 1,281,000.00 3-0 SClarkwood Rd Agnes St TX 44 0.25 A3 6 100% $ 3,260,000.00 3-P SClarkwood Rd TX 44 CR 36 0.76 A3 6 1 100% 1$ 10,455,000.00 3-Q S Clarkwood Rd CR 36 McGloin Rd 0.43 A3 6 100% $ 5,552,000.00 3-R CR 36 Gaviota St S Clarkwood Rd 0.33 Cl 2 100% $ 1,656,000.00 3-S Mckinzie Rd Creek View Dr Leopard St 0.30 A2 4 50% $ 1,510,000.00 3-T Mckinzie Rd Leopard St Frontier Dr 0.34 A2 4 50% $ 1,711,500.00 a 3-U Mckinzie Rd Frontier Dr Haven Dr 0.42 A2 4 50% $ 2,114,000.00 .Z 3-V Mckinzie Rd Haven Dr PR E-W Segment 1 0.50 A3 6 50% $ 3,549,500.00 3-W Mckinzie Rd PR E-W Segment 1 PR E-W Segment 2 0.50 A3 6 50% $ 3,549,500.00 3-X Mckinzie Rd PR E-W Segment 2 City Limits 0.55 A3 6 50% $ 3,869,500.00 3 3-Y Haven Dr(PR Segment) McKinzie Rd N-S PR Roadway 1 1.15 Cl 2 100% $ 7,096,000.00 3-Z N-S PR Roadway 1 Leopard St Haven Dr(PR Segment) 0.29 C3 4 100% $ 1,882,000.00 z 3-AA N-S PR Roadwayl Haven Dr(PR Segment) Oregon Trail(PR Segment) 0.32 C3 4 100% $ 2,076,000.00 3-AB N-S PR Roadway Oregon Trail(PR Segment) E-W PR Roadway 0.43 C3 4 100% $ 2,790,000.00 3-AC N-S PR Roadway 1 E-W PR Roadway 1 E-W PR Roadway 2 0.66 C3 4 100% $ 4,978,000.00 3-AD N-S PR Roadway 1 E-W PR Roadway 2 Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) 0.23 C3 4 100% $ 1,492,000.00 3-AE N-S PR Roadway 1 Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) Alpine St(PR Segment) 0.65 C3 4 100% $ 4,913,000.00 3-AF Oregon Trail(PR Segment) McKinzie Rd N-S PR Roadway 1.05 Cl 2 100% $ 6,600,000.00 3-AG Oregon Trail(PR Segment) N-S PR Roadway Oregon Trail(Constructed Segment) 0.15 Cl 2 100% $ 745,000.00 3-AH E-W PR Roadway 1 McKinzie Rd N-S PR Roadway 1 1.00 A2 4 100% $ 11,458,000.00 3-AI E-W PR Roadway 2 Rand Morgan Rd N-S PR Roadway 1 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,729,000.00 3-AI E-W PR Roadway 2 FM 2292 N Clarkwood Rd 0.72 A2 4 100% $ 7,945,000.00 3-AK E-W PR Roadway 3 Roadway Limits N-S PR Roadway 1 0.42 Cl 2 100% $ 2,084,000.00 3-AL E-W PR Roadway 3 N-S PR Roadway 1 FM 2292 0.48 Cl 2 100% $ 2,381,000.00 3-AM Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) City Limits N-S PR Roadway 1 0.62 Al 4 100% $ 5,385,000.00 3-AN Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) N-S PR Roadway 1 FM 2292 0.45 Al 4 100% $ 3,403,000.00 3-AO Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) FM 2292 N Clarkwood Rd 0.72 Al 4 100% $ 6,141,000.00 3-AP Alpine St(PR Segment) City Limits N-S PR Roadway 1 0.16 C2 3 100% $ 928,000.00 3-AQ Alpine St(PR Segment) N-S PR Roadway 1 FM 2292 0.22 C2 3 100% $ 1,288,000.00 3-AR Alpine St(PR Segment) FM 2292 N Clarkwood Rd 0.75 C2 3 100% $ 5,043,000.00 3-AS 1070'Sof Alpine St CR 44 0.47 A3 6 100% $ 6,042,000.00 $ 182,986,000.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPRepoftl230919a1.docx 22 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas CC AIRPORT 1(SERVICE AREA 4)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(in mi.) From To Designati Lanes Service in Servie Area 4-A Leopard St Corn Products Rd Benys Rd/N Lexington Blvd 0.51 A2 4 50% $ 2,903,000.00 4-B Leopard St Benys Rd/N Lexington Blvd Lantana St 0.51 A2 4 50% $ 2,927,500.00 4-C Leopard St Lantana St N Padre Island Dr 0.15 A2 4 50% $ 746,000.00 4-D Sedwick Rd N Clarkwood Rd Manning Rd 0.79 Al 4 50% $ 3,330,500.00 4-E Sedwick Rd Manning Rd Rhew Rd 0.39 Al 4 100% $ 2,929,000.00 4-F Sedwick Rd Rhew Rd Southern Minerals Rd 0.86 Al 4 100% $ 7,209,000.00 4-G Alpine St N Clarkwood Rd Manning Rd 0.79 Cl 2 100% $ 4,605,000.00 4-H Hopkins Rd Railroad Corn Products Rd 0.51 C3 4 100% $ 4,012,000.00 4-1 Hopkins Rd Corn Products Rd N Lexington Blvd 1.01 C3 4 100% $ 7,926,000.00 4-J N Clarkwood Rd Alpine St Sedwick Rd 0.51 Cl 2 50% $ 1,606,000.00 4-K N Clarkwood Rd Sedwick Rd 870'S of Caroline Rd 0.62 Cl 2 50% $ 1,884,500.00 4-L NClarkwood Rd 870'Sof Caroline Rd Leopard St 0.80 Cl 2 50% $ 2,344,500.00 4-M N Clarkwood Rd Leopard St IH 37 0.45 Cl 2 50% $ 1,129,000.00 4-N N Clarkwood Rd IH 37 Up River Rd 0.21 Cl 2 50% $ 526,500.00 4-0 Up River Rd 970'West of N Clarkwood Rd N Clarkwood Rd 0.18 C3 4 100% $ 1,192,000.00 4-P Up River Rd N Clarkwood Rd 1110'East of N Clarkwood Rd 0.21 C3 4 100% $ 1,364,000.00 a � 4-0. Tuloso Rd Up River Rd IH 37 0.24 A2 4 100% $ 2,372,000.00 G 4-R Tuloso Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.46 A2 4 100% $ 4,660,000.00 4-S Southern Minerals Rd Up River Rd IH 37 0.49 A2 4 100% $ 4,959,000.00 a 4-T Southern Minerals Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.25 A2 4 100% $ 2,494,000.00 4-U Southern Minerals Rd Leopard St Sedwick Rd 0.48 A2 4 100% $ 4,824,000.00 c 4-V N Lexington Blvd Leopard St Lantana St 0.63 A2 4 100% $ 6,992,000.00 4-W N Lexington Blvd Lantana St Hopkins Rd 0.28 A2 4 100% $ 2,803,000.00 4-X Corn Products Rd Leopard St Hopkins Rd 0.92 A2 4 100% $ 9,998,000.00 4-Y Manning Rd Sedwick Rd Alpine Rd 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,775,000.00 4-Z Manning Rd Alpine Rd Railroad 0.55 A2 4 100% $ 6,267,000.00 4-AA Manning Rd Railroad TX-44 0.04 A2 4 100% $ 402,000.00 4-AB Rhew Rd Leopard St Sedwick Rd 0.88 C3 4 100% $ 6,418,000.00 4 A Bronco Rd Bronco Rd(End) Alpine St 0.31 C3 4 100% $ 2,011,000.00 4-AD Bronco Rd Alpine St Railroad 0.55 C3 4 100% $ 4,264,000.00 4-AE Heinsohn Rd Agnes St TS-44 0.26 A2 4 100% $ 1,970,000.00 4 A Hopkins Rd TX-44 Agnes St 0.04 A2 4 100% $ 441,000.00 4-AG Alpine St Manning Rd Bronco Rd 0.50 C2 3 100% $ 3,615,000.00 4-AH Alpine St Bronco Rd Southern Minerals Rd 0.75 C2 3 100% $ 5,058,000.00 4 A Southern Minerals Sedwick Rd Alpine St 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,780,000.00 4-AI Southern Minerals Alpine St TX 44 0.54 A2 4 100% $ 6,181,000.00 4 A Tuloso Dr Leopard St 2568'S of Leopard St 0.70 Cl 2 50% $ 2,084,500.00 4-AL Tuloso Dr/Manning Dr 2568'S of Leopard St Sedwick Rd 0.61 Cl 2 50% $ 1,867,500.00 4-AN Rhew Rd Sedwick Rd Bronco Rd 0.23 C3 4 100% $ 1,524,000.00 4-AO IN Clarkwood Rd lAlpine St 1,080'South of Alpine St 0.20 Cl 2 50% $ 496,500.00 $ 139,891,000.00 CC AIRPORT 2(SERVICE AREA 5)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(in mi.) From To Designati Lanes Service in Service Area 5-A FM 665 N Padre Island Dr Jr Beck Dr 0.59 A3 6 50% $ 4,150,000.00 5-B FM 665 Jr Beck Dr Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) 0.13 A3 6 50% $ 800,500.00 5-C FM 665 Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) Heinsohn Rd(New Segment) 0.40 A3 6 50% $ 2,558,500.00 5-D FM 665 Heinsohn Rd(New Segment) Westside New Segment 0.54 A3 6 50% $ 3,798,500.00 5-E FM 665 Westside New Segment Saratoga Blvd 0.55 A3 6 50% $ 3,840,500.00 5-F Talbert Rd(N_S) Joe Mireur Rd TX-44 0.78 C3 4 100% $ 5,738,000.00 5-G Talbert Ln(E-W) Joe Mireur Rd Talbert Ln(N-S) 0.33 C3 4 100% $ 2,114,000.00 Q 5-H Talbert Ln(E-W) Talbert Ln(N-S) Heinsohn Rd 0.59 C3 4 100% $ 4,518,000.00 5-1 Bear Ln Hensohn Rd Junior Beck Dr 0.47 Al 4 100% $ 3,529,000.00 a 5-K Bear Ln Junior Beck Dr N Padre Island Dr 0.12 Al 4 100% $ 874,000.00 5-M Heinsohn RD TX-44 Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segme 0.24 A2 4 100% $ 2,432,000.00 c 5-N Heinsohn RD Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segment Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) 0.49 A2 4 100% $ 4,920,000.00 l? 5-0 Heinsohn RD Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) Bear Ln 0.49 A2 4 100% $ 4,966,000.00 5-P Heinsohn RD Bear Ln Proposed roadway segment 0.49 Al 4 100% $ 3,718,000.00 5-Q Heinsohn RD Proposed roadway segment Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) 0.22 Al 4 100% $ 1,676,000.00 5-W Joe Mireur Rd Heinsohn Rd(Proposed Segment) FM 665 0.59 A2 4 100% $ 6,598,000.00 5-X Bates Rd Padre Island Dr Heinsohn Rd 0.53 Cl 2 100% $ 3,328,000.00 5-Y Bates Rd Heinsohn Rd Joe Mireur Rd 0.92 Cl 2 100% $ 5,243,000.00 5-Z New Roadway Segment Heinsohn Rd(Proposed Segment) Jr Beck Dr 0.51 Cl 2 100% $ 3,215,000.00 5-AA New Roadway Segment Jr Beck Dr Padre Island Dr 0.41 Cl 2 100% $ 2,045,000.00 $ 70,062,000.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPReportl230919al.docx 23 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas WESTSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 6)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP %in Service Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(mi) MTP Lanes From To Designation Area in Service Area 6-A Leopard Street Benys Rd Lantana Rd 0.51 A2 4 50% $ 2,915,000.00 6-B Leopard Street Lantana Rd SH 358 0.14 A2 4 50% $ 704,500.00 6-C Up River Rd Dunn Meany rd Lantana Rd 0.23 C3 4 50% $ 746,000.00 6-D Up River Rd Lantana Rd McBride Ln 0.64 C3 4 50% $ 2,424,500.00 6-E Up River Rd McBride Ln Kansas City Southern Railway Trz 0.21 C3 4 50% $ 681,500.00 6-F Up River Rd Kansas City Southern Railway Track N Navigation Blvd 0.15 C3 4 50% $ 487,000.00 6-G Up River Rd 1-37 Leopard St 0.7 C3 4 100% $ 5,237,000.00 6-H Up River Rd Leopard St Old Robstown Rd 0.24 C3 4 100% $ 1,557,000.00 6-1 Up River Rd Old Robstown Rd Palm Dr 0.58 C3 4 100% $ 4,459,000.00 6-J Lipan St Palm Dr NPort Ave 0.25 C3 4 100% $ 1,623,000.00 6-K Lipan St NPort Ave N19th St 0.27 C3 4 100% $ 1,752,000.00 6-L Lipan St N19th St TX 286 0.21 C3 4 100% $ 1,363,000.00 6-M Horne Rd TX 286 Greenwood Dr 0.71 Al 4 100% $ 6,065,000.00 6-N Horne Rd Airport Rd Angela Dr 0.53 Al 4 100% $ 4,705,000.00 Q 6-0 Horne Rd Angela Dr Old Brownsville Rd 0.3 Al 4 100% $ 2,269,000.00 6-P S Navigation Blvd Old Brownsvillw Rd Bear Ln 0.2 Al 4 100% $ 1,514,000.00 a 6-0, S Navigation Blvd Bear Ln N Green Tree Dr 0.29 Al 4 100% $ 2,194,000.00 6-11 S Navigation Blvd N Green Tree Dr 2917'N of Bear Ln 0.2 Al 4 100% $ 1,514,000.00 6-S S Navigation Blvd 2917'N of Bear Ln Santa Elena St 0.49 Al 4 100% $ 3,706,000.00 6-T S Navigation Blvd Santa Elena St Agnes St 0.5 Al 4 100% $ 4,478,000.00 3 6-U S Navigation Blvd Agnes St Leopard St 0.79 Al 4 100% $ 6,671,000.00 6-V Bear Ln TX 358 Flato Rd 0.44 Al 4 100% $ 3,328,000.00 6-W Bear Ln Flato Rd Cliff Maus Dr 0.39 Al 4 100% $ 2,949,000.00 6-X Bear Ln Cliff Maus Dr Navigation Blvd 0.12 Al 4 100% $ 908,000.00 6-Y Bear Ln Navigation Blvd Old Brownsville Rd 0.26 Al 4 100% $ 1,966,000.00 6-Z Santa Elena St Flato Rd Navigation Blvd 0.52 Cl 2 100% $ 3,276,000.00 6-AA Santa Elena St 345'E of Centaurus St Omaha Dr Ext 0.06 Cl 2 100% $ 299,000.00 6-AB ISanta Elena St Omaha Dr Ext 233'E of 45th St 0.22 Cl 2 100% $ 1,092,000.00 6-AC Omaha Dr Ext Agnes St Santa Elena St 0.5 Cl 2 100% $ 3,177,000.00 6-AD Omaha Dr Ext Santa Elena St Bates Rd Ext 0.49 Cl 2 100% $ 2,432,000.00 6-AE Bates Rd Ext Flato Rd Navigation Blvd 0.51 Cl 1 2 1 100% $ 3,226,000.00 6-AF Bates Rd Ext Navigation Blvd Omaha Dr Ext 0.31 Cl 2 100% $ 1,538,000.00 6-AG Bates Rd Ext Omaha Dr Ext Old Brownsville Rd 0.42 Cl 2 100% $ 2,084,000.00 6-AH Omaha Dr Ext Navigation Blvd EX Omaha Dr End 0.34 Cl 2 100% $ 1,688,000.00 $ 85,028,500.00 WESTSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 7)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP %in Service Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(mi) MTP Lanes From To Designation Area in Service Area 7-A Saratoga Blvd Old Brownsville Rd CR 37 0.61 Al 4 50% $ 2,655,000.00 7-13 Saratoga Blvd CR 37 CR 35 0.7 A3 6 50% $ 4,830,000.00 7-C Saratoga Blvd CR 35 Calle Las Colonias 0.45 A3 6 50% $ 2,881,000.00 7-D Saratoga Blvd Calle Las Colonias 275'West of Cll Cuernavaca 0.22 A3 6 50% $ 1,408,500.00 7-E Saratoga Blvd 275'West of C11 Cuernavaca Greenwood Dr 0.33 A3 6 100% $ 4,227,000.00 7-F Saratoga Blvd Greenwood Dr New Road(North of Saratoga) 0.35 A3 6 100% $ 4,482,000.00 7-G Saratoga Blvd New Road(North of Saratoga) TX286 0.42 A3 6 100% $ 5,378,000.00 7-H Holly Rd Los Robles St Greenwood Dr 0.21 A2 4 100% $ 2,114,000.00 7-1 Holly Rd Greenwood Dr Martin St 0.5 A2 4 100% $ 5,729,000.00 7-J Holly Rd Martin St TX286 0.28 A2 4 100% $ 2,819,000.00 7-K Old Brownsville Rd SH 358 158'N of J r Beck Dr 0.6 A3 6 50% $ 4,190,000.00 7-L Old Brownsville Rd 158'N of J r Beck Dr Holly Rd Extension 0.12 A3 6 50% $ 768,500.00 7-M Old Brownsville Rd Holly Rd Extension New Road EW 2 0.4 A3 6 50% $ 2,561,500.00 7-N Old Brownsville Rd New Road EW 2 New Road EWl 0.54 A3 6 50% $ 3,805,500.00 7-0 Old Brownsville Rd New Road EW 1 Saratoga Blvd 0.55 A3 6 1 50% $ 3,869,500.00 7-P Greenwood Dr Saratoga Blvd New Road(S of Saratoga) 0.5 A2 4 100% $ 5,729,000.00 7-Q Greenwood Dr New Road(S of Saratoga) 2250'S of New Road(S of Saratoga) 0.43 C3 4 100% $ 2,790,000.00 7-R Sliverberry Dr Extension Sliverberry Dr Greenwood Dr 0.54 Cl 2 100% $ 3,376,000.00 7-S Martin St Extension Holly Rd Crosstown Expy 0.57 Cl 2 100% $ 3,524,000.00 G 7-T Martin St Extension 136 S of Secretariat St New Road EW 3 0.03 Cl 2 100% $ 149,000.00 7-U Lands Rd Extension 600'East of Harwick Dr New Road(North of Saratoga) 0.15 Cl 2 100% $ 745,000.00 o 7-V Lands Rd Extension New Road(North of Saratoga) Martin St Extension 0.15 Cl 2 100% $ 745,000.00 7-W Lands Rd Extension Martin Rd Extension Crosstown Expy 0.28 Cl 2 100% $ 1,389,000.00 7-X New Road EW 3 Martin Rd Extension Crosstown Expy 0.28 Cl 2 100% $ 1,389,000.00 7-Y Martin St Lands Rd Extension New Road EW 3 0.49 Cl 2 100% $ 2,432,000.00 3 7-Z New Road(North of Saratoga) Lands Rd Extension Saratoga Blvd 0.25 Cl 2 100% $ 1,241,000.00 7-AA New Road(South of Saratoga) Saratoga Blvd Greenwood Dr 0.83 Cl 2 100% $ 4,814,000.00 7-AB Greenwood Dr Extension Greenw000d Dr TX286 0.49 Pi 2 100% $ 2,803,000.00 7-AC Holly Rd Extension Old Brownsville Rd W Point NS 1 0.08 A2 4 100% $ 806,000.00 7-AD Holly Rd Extension W Point Rd NS 1 Extension CR 37 0.31 A2 4 100% $ 3,122,000.00 7-AE Holly Rd Extension Extension CR 37 Extension CR 35 0.55 A2 4 100% $ 6,234,000.00 7-AF Holly Rd Extension Extension CR 35 Bush St 0.6 A2 4 100% $ 6,737,000.00 7-AG W Point NS 1 W Point Rd Holly Rd Extension 0.1 Cl 2 100% $ 497,000.00 7-AH Extension CR 37 Saratoga Blvd New Road EW 1 0.43 Cl 2 100% $ 2,133,000.00 7-AI Extension CR 37 New Road EW 1 New Road EW 2 0.54 Cl 2 100% $ 3,376,000.00 7-AI Extension CR 37 New Road EW 2 Holly Rd Extension 0.38 Cl 2 100% $ 1,885,000.00 7-AK Extension CR 37 Holly Rd Extension W Point Rd 0.27 Cl 2 100% $ 1,340,000.00 7-AL New Road EW 2 Old Brownsville Rd Extension CR 37 0.38 Cl 2 100% $ 1,885,000.00 7-AM New Road EW 1 Old Brownsville Rd Extension CR 37 0.34 Cl 2 100% $ 1,688,000.00 7-AN New Road EW 1 Extension CR 37 Extension CR 35 0.68 Cl 2 100% $ 4,070,000.00 7-AO Extension CR 35 Saratoga Blvd New Road EW 1 0.44 A2 4 100% $ 4,430,000.00 7-AP Extension CR 35 New Road EW 1 Holly Rd Extension 0.71 AZ 4 100% $ 7,843,000.00 7-AQ Extension CR 35 Holly Rd Extension W Point Rd 0.64 AZ 4 100% $ 7,138,000.00 7-AR Calle las Colonias Ext Calle las Colonias JExtension CR 37 0.6 Cl 2 100% $ 3,673,000.00 $ 139,701,500.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPRepoftl230919al.docx 24 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas DOWNTOWN(SERVICE AREA 8)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length From To Designati Lanes Service in Service Area 8-A N Port Ave Antelope St IH 37 0.04 Al 4 50% $ 151,500.00 8-13 N Port Ave IH 37 W Broadway St 0.60 A2 4 50% $ 3,368,500.00 8-C E Port Ave W Broadway St Union Pacific/W Broadway St 0.13 A2 4 100% $ 1,354,000.00 v 8-D E Port Ave Union Pacific/W Broadway St N Tancahua St 0.58 A2 4 100% $ 6,548,000.00 .Z 8-E E Port Ave N Tancahua St US 181 0.12 A2 4 100% $ 1,173,000.00 8-F E Port Ave US 181 N Mesquite St 0.03 A2 4 100% $ 348,000.00 3 8-G Hirsch St N Mesquite St N Chaparral St 0.05 A2 4 100% $ 502,000.00 ° 8-H Seagull Blvd Burleson St EWalnut St 0.41 Cl 2 100% $ 2,023,000.00 0 8-I Seagull Blvd EWalnut St Elm St 0.07 Cl 2 100% $ 342,000.00 8-J N Staples St W Broadway St N Tancahua St 0.25 Cl 2 100% $ 1,241,000.00 8-K N Staples St N Tancahua St US 181 0.06 Cl 2 100% $ 299,000.00 $ 17,350,000.00 BAYSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 9)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway Limits Length(mi) MTP Designation MTP Lanes %in Service Area Total Project Cost From To in Service Area 9-A McArdle Rd Ayers St Kostoryz Rd 1 C2 3 100% $ 7,188,000.00 9-13 McArdle Rd Kostoryz Rd Carroll Ln 0.5 C2 3 100% $ 3,595,000.00 9-C Ayers St Ocean Dr Santa Fe St 0.20 A2 4 100% $ 2,014,000.00 9-D Ayers St Santa Fe ST S Staples St 0.35 A2 4 100% $ 3,524,000.00 9-E Ayers St SStaples St S Brownlee Blvd 0.12 Al 4 100% $ 908,000.00 9-F Ayers St SBrownlee Blvd Baldwin Blvd 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 4,478,000.00 9-G Kostoryz Rd SStaples St Norton St 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 4,478,000.00 a 9-H Kostoryz Rd Norton St Brawner Pkwy 0.35 Al 4 100% $ 2,648,000.00 a 9-I Doddridge St SAlmeda St SStaples St 0.55 Al 4 100% $ 4,856,000.00 9-1 SStaples St Morgan Ave Elizabeth St 0.10 A! 4 100% $ 757,000.00 _ 9-K SStaples St Elizabeth St Booty St 0.12 Al 4 100% $ 908,000.00 9-L SStaples St Booty St Ayers St 0.15 Al 4 100% $ 1,135,000.00 9-M SStaples St I Ayers St Louisiana Ave 0.65 Al 4 100% $ 5,612,000.00 9-13 SAlameda St Doddridge St Carmel Pkwy 0.84 A2 4 100% $ 9,131,000.00 9-S SAlameda St Carmel Pkwy Everhart Rd 0.13 AZ 4 100% $ 1,306,000.00 9-T SAlameda St Everhart Rd Robert Dr 0.15 AZ 4 50% $ 755,500.00 9-W Everhart Extension ICenter Dr I Santa Fe St 0.14 Al 4 100% $ 1,060,000.00 $ 54,353,500.00 BAYSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 10) Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(MI) Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost From To Designation Lanes Service in Service Area 10-A McArdle Rd Everhart Rd 125 ft east of Holmes Or 0.47 C3 4 100% $ 3,031,000.00 10-B Ocean Or Ennis Joslin Rd 4132 ft east of Sand Dollar Blvd 1.77 A2 4 100% $ 19,900,000.00 2 10-C McArdle Rd Nile Dr. Rodd Field Rd 0.38 C3 4 100% $ 2p65,000.00 10-D McArdle Rd Rodd Field Rd Ennis Joslin Rd 0.48 C3 4 100% $ 3,115,000.00 10-G Airline Rd Ocean Or Gaines St 0.32 Al 4 100% $ 2p20,000.00 10-J Gaines St Robert Or Airline Rd 0.59 Cl 2 100% $ 3,624,000.00 $ 34,555,000.00 SOUTHSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 11)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP %in Service Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(mi) MTP Designation From To Lanes Area in Service Area 11-A Ayers St SH 358 Civitan Or 0.38 Al 4 100% $ 2,874,000.00 11-B Ayers St Civitan Or Holly Rd 0.37 Al 4 100% $ 2,799,000.00 11-C Tiger Ln Carroll Ln Weber Rd 0.5 C2 3 100% $ 3,595,000.00 11-D Weber Rd SH 358 Tiger Ln 0.24 A2 4 50% $ 1,208,500.00 11-E Weber Rd Tiger Ln Capri Or 0.3 A2 4 50% $ 1,510,000.00 11-F Weber Rd Capri Or Holly Rd 0.19 A2 4 50% $ 956,500.00 11-G Weber Rd Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 0.21 A2 4 50% $ 1,057,000.00 11-H Weber Rd Schanen Blvd Wickersham St 0.44 A2 4 50% $ 2,215,000.00 11-I Weber Rd Wickersham St Capitol Or 0.16 A2 4 50% $ 805,500.00 w 11-J Weber Rd Capitol Or Saratoga Blvd 0.2 A2 4 50% $ 1,007,000.00 •2 11-K Weber Rd Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Or 0.15 A3 6 50% $ 960,500.00 _ 11-L Weber Rd Acushnet Or Bratton Rd 0.35 A3 6 50% $ 2,241,000.00 11-M Weber Rd Bratton Rd Aaron Or 0.25 A3 6 50% $ 1,601,000.00 _ 11-N Weber Rd Aaron Or Yorktown Blvd 0.27 A3 6 50% $ 1,729,000.00 11-0 Weber Rd Yorktown Blvd Oso Creek 0.38 A3 6 50% $ 2833,000.00 v'or 11-Q Carrel LnW Wickersham St(PR Segment) Masterson Or 0.3 Cl 2 100% $ 1p89,000.00 11-T Allencrest Or(PR Segment) Carmago Or Saratoga Blvd 0.25 C12 100% $ 1,241,000.00 11-U Norchester Or Glenway St Saratoga Blvd 0.26 Cl 2 100% $ 1,291,000.00 11-V Wickersham St Carroll Ln W Carroll Ln E 0.04 Cl 2 100% $ 199,000.00 11-W Wickersham St ICarroll LnE I Norchester Or 0.12 Cl 2 100% 1$ 596,000.00 11-X Kram St IBratton Rd Weber Rd 0.35 Cl 2 100% $ 1,737,000.00 11-Y Kostoryz Rd(PR Segment) Saratoga Blvd Brezina Rd 1.06 A3 6 100% $ 14,965,000.00 11-Z Kostoryz Rd(PR Segment) Brezina Rd Webber Rd 0.22 A3 6 100% $ 2,817,000.00 $ 51,327,000.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPReportl230919al.docx 25 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas SOUTHSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 12)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway From To Length(mi) MTP Designation MTP Lanes%In Service Area Total Project Cost in Service Area 12-A Weber Rd SH 358 Tiger Ln 0.25 A2 4 50% $ 1,258,500.00 12-C Weber Rd Tiger Ln Capri or 0.30 A2 4 50% $ 1,510,000.00 12-D Weber Rd Capri or Holly Rd 0.19 A2 4 50% $ 968,000.00 12-E Weber Rd Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 0.21 A2 4 50% $ 1,059,000.00 12-F Weber Rd Schanen Blvd Wickersham St 0.44 A2 4 50% $ 2,237,500.00 12-G Weber Rd Wickersham St Capitol or 0.16 A2 4 50% $ 803,500.00 12-H Weber Rd Capitol or Saratoga Blvd 0.20 A2 4 50% $ 984,000.00 12-1 Weber Rd Saratoga Blvd Acushnet or 0.15 A3 6 50% $ 975,000.00 12-J Weber Rd Acushnet or Bratton Rd 0.35 A3 6 50% $ 2,231,500.00 12-K Weber Rd Bratton Rd Aaron or 0.25 A3 6 50% $ 1,592,000.00 12-L Weber Rd Aaron or Yorktown Blvd 0.27 A3 6 50% $ 1,759,500.00 12-N Yorktown Blvd Weber Rd Sun Valley or 0.33 A3 6 50% $ 2,143,000.00 G 12-0 Yorktown Blvd Sun Valley or Oso Pkwy 0.74 A3 6 50% $ 5,088,000.00 •2 12-P Yorktown Blvd Oso Pkwy Everhart Rd 0.45 A3 6 50% $ 2,898,500.00 12-Q Yorktown Blvd Everhart Rd Lipes Blvd 0.41 A3 6 50% $ 2,655,500.00 12-R Yorktown Blvd Lipes Blvd SStaples St 0.59 A3 6 50% $ 4,125,500.00 12-S Yorktown Blvd SStaples St Loire Blvd 0.45 A3 6 50% $ 2,906,500.00 12-T Yorktown Blvd Loire Blvd Cimarron Blvd 0.55 A3 6 50% $ 3,869,500.00 N 12-U Everhart Rd Woolridge Rd Congressional or 0.29 Al 4 100% $ 2,171,000.00 12-V Everhart Rd Congressional or Saratoga Blvd 0.35 Al 4 100% $ 2,669,000.00 12-AC S Staples St Saratoga Blvd Timbergate or 0.50 A3 6 100% $ 7,153,000.00 12-AD SStaples St Timbergate or Lipes Blvd 0.50 A3 6 100% $ 7,108,000.00 12-AE SStaples St Lipes Blvd Yorktown Blvd 0.50 A3 6 100% $ 7,108,000.00 12-AF Lipes Blvd SStaples St Gingerberry or 0.27 C3 4 100% $ 1,766,000.00 12-AG Lipes Blvd Gingerberry or Spanish Wood or 0.12 C3 4 100% $ 771,000.00 12-AH Lipes Blvd Spanish Wood or Brockhampton St 0.36 C3 4 100% $ 2,358,000.00 12-AI Lipes Blvd Brockhampton St Cimarron Blvd 0.26 C3 4 100% $ 1,670,000.00 12-A1 Patti or Commonwealth or Timbergate or 0.17 Cl 2 100% $ 867,000.00 12-AK Simpson Dr(PR Segment) I Saratoga Blvd I Dunbarton Oak or 0.19 Cl 2 100% $ 945,000.00 $ 73,651,000.00 SOUTHSIDE 4(SERVICE AREA 13)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway Limits Length(mi) MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost From To Designation Lanes Service in Service Area 13-A Yorktown Blvd Weber Rd Sun Valley or 0.33 A3 6 50% $ 2,113,500.00 13-B Yorktown Blvd Sun Valley or Oso Pkwy 0.74 A3 6 50% $ 5,086,000.00 13-C Yorktown Blvd Oso Pkwy Everhart Rd 0.45 A3 6 50% $ 2,881,000.00 13-D Yorktown Blvd Everhart Rd Lipes Blvd 0.41 A3 6 50% $ 2,625,000.00 13-E Yorktown Blvd Lipes Blvd S Staples St 0.59 A3 6 50% $ 4,125,500.00 13-G Yorktown Blvd S Staples St Loire Blvd 0.45 A3 6 100•/. $ 5,762,000.00 G 13-H Yorktown Blvd Loire Blvd Cimarron Blvd 0.55 A3 6 100•. $ 7,739,000.00 13-1 Yorktown Blvd Cimarron Blvd 309'W of W Logan or 0.6 A3 6 100•. $ 8,380,000.00 w 13-J Yorktown Blvd 309'W of Logan or Rodd Field Rd 0.39 A3 6 100•. $ 4,994,000.00 v 13-K Yorktown Blvd Rodd Field Rd Freds Folly or 0.47 A3 6 100•. $ 6,019,000.00 13-L Yorktown Blvd Freds Folly or 1274'E of Starry Rd 0.77 A3 6 100• $ 10,556,000.00 13-M Yorktown Blvd 1274'E of Starry Rd Cayo del Oso(Water Feature) 0.36 A3 6 100•. $ 4,610,000.00 13-Q S Staples St Oso Pkwy 185'E of S Oso Pkwy 0.71 A3 6 100•/. $ 9,730,000.00 13-W Road H/Dalmation or Safety Steel or lRodd Field Road 0.20 Cl 2 100• $ 993,000.00 13-AB Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) PR E-W Segment Oso Pkwy 0.42 A3 6 100.1 $ 5,378,000.00 13-AC Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) Oso Pkwy City Limits 0.47 A3 6 100•. $ 6,019,000.00 13-AF Oso Pkwy lYorktown Blvd lRodd Field Rd(PR Segment) 2.00 PI 2 100• $ 14,222,000.00 13-AG Oso Pkwy Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) I Cimarron Blvd 1.15 Pl 2 100• $ 7,969,000.00 $ 109,202,000.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPReportl230919al.docx 26 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas SOUTHSIDE 3(SERVICE AREA 14)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Service Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length From To Designation Lanes Area in Service Area 14-D Paul Jones Ave SH 358 1540'S of SH 358 0.29 C3 4 100% $ 1,895,000.00 14-E Paul Jones Ave 1540'S of SH 358 Holly Rd 0.50 C3 4 100% $ 3,231,000.00 14-F Holly Rd Rodd Field Rd Lexington Rd 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 4p85,000.00 14-G Holly Rd Lexington Rd Ennis Joslin Rd 0.28 A3 6 100% $ 3,641,000.00 14-H Holly Rd Ennis Joslin Rd Paul Jones Ave 0.47 A2 4 100% $ 4,759,000.00 14-J Woolridge Rd Rodd Field Rd Victoria Park Dr 0.63 A2 4 100% $ 7,047,000.00 14-K Woolridge Rd Victoria Park Dr Ennis Joslin Rd 0.15 A2 4 100% $ 1,531,000.00 14-L Lipes Blvd Cimarron Blvd Bronx Dr 0.39 C3 4 100% $ 2,561,000.00 14-M Lipes Blvd Bronx Dr Airline Rd 0.31 C3 4 100% $ 2,020,000.00 14-N Yorktown Blvd Rodd Field Rd Freds Folly Dr 0.47 A3 6 100% $ 6,054,000.00 14-0 Yorktown Blvd Freds Folly Dr 1274'E of Starry Rd 0.77 A3 6 100% $ 10,566,000.00 14-P Yorktown Blvd 1274'E of Starry Rd Cayo del Oso(Water Feature) 0.36 A3 6 100% $ 4,598,000.00 14-Q Airline Rd SH 358 Williams Dr 0.28 A3 6 50% $ 1,764,500.00 14-R Airline Rd Williams Dr Holly Rd 0.55 A3 6 50% $ 3,898,500.00 14-S Airline Rd Holly Rd Cimarron Blvd 0.39 A3 6 50% $ 2,522,500.00 14-T Airline Rd Cimarron Blvd Woolridge Rd 0.17 A3 6 100% $ 2,229,000.00 14-Z Saratoga Blvd Cimarron Blvd Airline Rd 0.38 A3 6 100% $ 4,866,000.00 14-AA Saratoga Blvd Airline Rd Rodd Field Rd 0.63 A3 6 100% $ 8,764,000.00 14-AB Yorktown Blvd Cimarron Blvd 309'W of Bichon Dr 0.6 A3 6 50% $ 4,190,000.00 14-AC Yorktown Blvd 309'W of W Logan Dr Rodd Field Rd 0.39 A3 6 50% $ 2897,000.00 14-AD Williams Dr Rodd Field Dr Lexington Rd 0.51 C3 4 100% $ 4,005,000.00 14-AE Williams DrLexington Rd Ennis Joslin Rd 0.28 C3 4 100% $ 1,817,000.00 14-AG Oso Parkway Country Road 26A Country Road 26 0.52 Pl 2 100% $ 3,670,000.00 14-AH Oso Parkway Country Road 26 Yorktown Blvd 0.66 Pl 2 100% $ 4p70,000.00 14-AI Freds Folly Dr Las Bahias Dr Yorktown Blvd 0.28 Cl 2 100% $ 1,389,000.00 14-AJ Country Rd 26 330'E of Pennine Way Oso Pakway(Proposed Section) 0.18 Cl 2 100% $ 893,000.00 14-AL Country Rd 26A Country Rd 71b Cir Oso Paknvay(Proposed Section) 0.34 Cl 2 100% $ 1,688,000.00 $ 101,051,500.00 LONDON(SERVICE AREA 15)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway Limits Length(mi) MTP MTP %in Total Project From To Designation Lanes Service Cost 15-A S Oso Pkwy(PR Segme Deer Park Rd 20A(PR Segment) 0.6 Pl 2 100% $ 4,128,000.00 15-B S Oso Pkwy(PR Segme 20A(PR Segment) City Limits 0.3 Pl 2 100% $ 1,717,000.00 15-C 20A(PR Segment) City Limits S Oso Pkwy(PR Segment) 0.25 C3 4 100% $ 1,623,000.00 15-D CR 41 CR 20A 315'S of Mars Hill Or 0.5 C3 4 50% $ 1,970,000.00 15-E CR 41 315'S of Mars Hill Or S Staples St 0.5 C3 4 50% $ 1,970,000.00 F 15-F CR 41 S Staples St Kitty Hawk Or(PR Segment) 0.5 A2 4 50% $ 2,864,500.00 m 15-G CR 41 Kitty Hawk Or(PR Segment) City Limits 0.5 A2 4 100% $ 5,729,000.00 15-H N-S Segment 1 Kitty Hawk Or(PR Segment) City Limits 0.63 C3 4 100% $ 4,784,000.00 v .� 15-I E-W PR Segment 1 CR 41 N-S Segment 1 0.48 Cl 2 100% $ 2,381,000.00 N 15-J E-W PR Segment 1 N-S Segment 1 S Oso Pkwy 0.45 Cl 2 100% $ 2,233,000.00 15-K Kitty Hawk Or(PR Segr CR 41 N-S Segment 1 0.23 C3 4 100% $ 1,492,000.00 ,30 15-L Kitty Hawk Or(PR Seg N-S Segment 1 Kitty Hawk Or 0.12 Cl 2 100% $ 596,000.00 15-M S Oso Pkwy(PR Segme City Limits City Limits 0.7 Pl 2 100% $ 4,699,000.00 15-S E-W PR Segment 2 Lady Alexa Or City Limits 0.52 C3 4 100% $ 4,070,000.00 15-U CR 33 CR 43 Lady Claudia St 0.38 C3 4 50% $ 2,781,000.00 15-V CR 33 Lady Claudia St City Limits 0.75 C3 4 50% $ 2,035,000.00 15-W Lady Claudia St Lady Alexa Or N-S Segment 0.52 C3 4 100% $ 1,298,000.00 15-X Lady Claudia St N-S Segment 2 CR 33 0.2 C3 4 100% $ 2,465,000.00 $48,835,500.00 FLOUR BLUFF 1(SERVICE AREA 16)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length From To Designation Lanes Service in Service Area 16-C NAS Dr Roadway Limits Webb St 0.70 A3 6 100% $ 9,660,000.00 16-E Waldron Rd Webb St Clarice St 0.07 A2 4 100% $ 705,000.00 16-F Waldron Rd Clarice St John F Kennedy Memorial Causeway 0.30 A2 4 100% $ 3,020,000.00 16-G Waldron Rd John F Kennedy Memorial Causeway Compton Rd 0.23 A2 4 100% $ 2,316,000.00 16-H Waldron Rd Compton Rd Graham Rd 0.26 A2 4 100% $ 2,617,000.00 16-1 Waldron Rd Graham Rd Don Patricio Rd 1 0.50 A2 1 4 1 100% 1$ 5,729,000.00 16-J Waldron Rd IDon Patricio Rd IStardust Ln(PR Segment) 0.25 A2 1 4 100% $ 2,517,000.00 16-K Waldron RdStardust Ln(PR Segment) Purdue Rd 0.25 A2 4 100% $ 2,517,000.00 16-L Waldron Rd Purdue Rd Hustlin Hornet Dr 0.06 A2 4 50% $ 302,500.00 16-M Division Rd ICoastline IFlour Bluff Dr 0.72 A2 4 50% $ 3,972,500.00 $ 33,356,000.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpoll231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayClPReportl230919al.docx 27 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas FLOUR BLUFF 2(SERVICE AREA 17)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Service Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length From To Designati Lanes Area in Service Area 17-A Yorktown Blvd Laguna Shores Rd Waldron Rd 0.88 C2 3 100% $ 5,784,000.00 17-B Yorktown Blvd Waldron Rd Flour Bluff Dr 1.00 A2 4 100% $ 11,497,000.00 17-C Yorktown Blvd Flour Bluff Or Scarlet Oak Or 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,771,000.00 17-D Yorktown Blvd Scarlet Oak Or Berlet Ln 0.25 A2 4 100% $ 2,553,000.00 17-E Yorktown Blvd Berlet Ln Roscher Rd 0.25 A2 4 100% $ 2,507,000.00 17-F Yorktown Blvd Roscher Rd 1894ft west of Roscher Rd 0.36 A2 4 100% $ 3,612,000.00 17-G Waldron Rd Hustlin Hornet Or Glenoak Or 0.44 A2 4 100% $ 4,389,000.00 17-H Waldron Rd Glenoak Or Caribbean Dr 0.50 A2 4 100% $ 5,735,000.00 G 17-1 Waldron Rd Caribbean Or Mediterranean Or 0.33 Al 4 100% $ 2,493,000.00 17-J Waldron Rd Mediterranean Or Yorktown Blvd 0.68 Al 4 100% $ 5,809,000.00 a 17-L Flour Bluff Or Division Rd Purdue Rd 0.25 Al 4 100% $ 1,889,000.00 17-M Flour Bluff Or Purdue Rd Glenoak Or 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 3,757,000.00 17-N Flour Bluff Or Glenoak Or Caribbean Or 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 4,511,000.00 Ri 17-0 Flour Bluff Or Caribbean Or Ramfield Rd 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 4,492,000.00 17-P Flour Bluff Or Ramfield Rd Yorktown Blvd 0.50 Al 4 100% $ 3,771,000.00 .2 17-Q Roscher Rd(PR Segment) Roscher Rd(Constructed Segment) Glenoak Or 0.05 C12 100% $ 249,000.00 17-R Purdue Rd(PR Segment) Flour Bluff Or Glenoak Or 0.85 Cl 2 100% $ 4,913,000.00 17-S Purdue Rd(PR Segment) Glenoak Or Caribbean Or 0.50 Cl 2 100% $ 3,177,000.00 17-T Golden Oak Dr(PR Segment) Caribbean Or Ramfield Rd 0.53 Cl 2 100% $ 3,325,000.00 17-V Scarlet Oak Dr(PR Segment) Yorktown Blvd Flour Bluff Or 0.70 Cl 2 100% $ 4,169,000.00 17-W Scarlet Oak Or(PR Segment) Flour Bluff Or Yorktown Blvd 0.70 Cl 2 100% $ 4,169,000.00 17-X Glenoak Or(PR Segment) Glenoak Or(Constructed Segment) Roscher Rd 0.25 Cl 2 100% $ 1,241,000.00 $ 89,813,000.00 PADRE ISLAND 1(SERVICE AREA 18)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(in mi.) From To Designati Lanes Service in Service Area 18-A TX 361 Beach Access Rd 2 Sea Way Or 0.78 RA3 4 50% $ 3,642,500.00 18-B TX 361 Sea Way Or 1043'N of La Concha Blvd 0.43 RA3 4 50% $ 1,824,000.00 18-C TX 361 1043'N of La Concha Blvd 1053'S of Beach View Or 0.54 RA3 4 50% $ 2,622,500.00 18-D TX 361 1053'S of Beach View Or 1350'N of Beach View Or 0.45 RA3 4 50% $ 1,922'500.00 18-E TX 361 1350'N of Beach View Or Seacomber Or 0.23 RA3 4 50% $ 984,500.00 18-F TX 361 Seacomber Or 462'N of Porto Villageo Or 0.28 RA3 4 100% $ 2,366,000.00 18-G TX 361 462'N of Porto Vi llageo Or 1283'N of Mustang Island Estate 0.46 RA3 4 100% $ 3,890,000.00 18-H TX 361 1283'N of Mustang Island Estates D 211'N of Mariner's Or 0.51 RA3 4 100% $ 5,047,000.00 18-1 460'S of Bikini Or Access Road 2 0.58 Cl 2 100% $ 3,580,000.00 18-J Access Rd No 2 Sea Way Or(Proposed Segment) 0.79 Cl 2 100% $ 4,595,000.00 18-K Sea Way Or(Proposed Segment) 1-C 0.44 Cl 2 100% $ 2,162,000.00 18-L 1-C 1-E 0.54 C1 2 100% $ 3,393,000.00 •2 18-M 1-E Seacomber Or 0.67 Cl 2 100% $ 4,031,000.00 18-N Seacomber Or 1-G 0.29 Cl 2 100% $ 1p28,000.00 18-0 1-G 1-1 0.46 Cl 2 100% $ 2,284,000.00 18-P 1-J City Limits 0.51 Cl 2 100% $ 3,234,000.00 18-Q TX 361 1-A 0.24 Cl 2 100% $ 1,175,000.00 18-R Coastline TX 361 0.33 Cl 2 100% $ 1,649,000.00 o. 18-S TX 361 1-B 0.23 Cl 2 100% $ 1,147,000.00 18-T Coastline TX 361 0.33 Cl 2 100% $ 1,644,000.00 18-U TX 361 1-D 0.16 Cl 2 100% $ 809,000.00 18-V TX 361 Coastline 0.34 Cl 2 100% $ 1,705,000.00 18-W La Concha Blvd Coastline 0.17 Cl 2 100% $ 840,000.00 18-X 1-F TX 361 0.16 Cl 2 100% $ 780,000.00 18-Y 1-H TX 361 0.15 Cl 2 100% $ 761,000.00 18-Z 1-1 TX 361 0.15 Cl 2 100% $ 742,000.00 18-AA TX 361 Coastline 0.35 Cl 2 100% $ 1,760,000.00 18-AB TX 361 Coastline 0.36 Cl 2 100% $ 1,795,000.00 $ 61,813,000.00 PADRE ISLAND 2(SERVICE AREA 19)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(in mi.) From E; Designation Lanes Service in Service Area Padre Island 2(Service Area 19) 19-A TX 361 1 Gulf Beach Access Road 3 BeachAccess;Rd2l 4.66 1 RA3 4 1 100% 15 45,791,000.00 $ 45,791,000.00 PADRE ISLAND 3(SERVICE AREA 20)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP %in Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(in mi.) From To Designati Lanes Service in Service Area '2 20-A TX 361 S Padre Island Or 572'East of S Padre Island Or 0.11 RA3 4 50% $ 459,500.00 20-B TX 361 572'East of S Padre Island Or Zahn Rd 0.75 RA3 4 50% $ 3,525,500.00 20-C TX 361 Zahn Rd Newport Pass Rd 1.04 RA3 4 50% $ 5,107,000.00 20-D TX 361 Newport Pass Rd Gulf Beach Access Road 3 1.19 RA3 4 50% $ 5,735,500.00 20-E Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Section) Parc Rd 22 Packery Channel Parc Rd 1.60 Cl 2 100% $ 10,025,000.00 20-1 Parc Rd 22 Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Sectio 0.11 Cl 2 100% $ 541,000.00 20-1 Parc Rd 22 Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Sectio 0.11 Cl 2 100% $ 541,000.00 $ 25,934,500.00 Ilpape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReport1230919a1.docx 28 PAPE-DAWSON ��ENGINEERS ROADWAY MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN City of Corpus Christi, Texas PADRE ISLAND 4(SERVICE AREA 21)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP Total Project Cost Service Area Project Number Roadway From To Length(in mi.) Designati Lanes %in Service Area in Service Area 'Z 21-A Sea Pines Dr(Proposed Segment( Sea Pines Dr 2,326 ft North of Sea Pines Dr 0.44 C2 3 100% $ 2,551,000.00 _ 21-B P,1Av (Proposed Segment( White Cap Blvd 1,079 ft South of White Cap Blvd 0.20 C1 2 100% $ 1,016,000.00 21-C Coral Vines St(Proposed Segment( Sea Pines Dr Allamanda Dr 0.30 C2 3 100% $ 1,740,000.00 21-E Palmic Ave 1,079 ft South of White Cap Blvd Access Rd 0.20 C1 2 100% $ 1,009,000.00 21-F Access Rd 6 504'N of Access Rd 6 0.10 C1 2 100% $ 474,000.00 21-G Palmlra Ave P.,k Rd 22 0.10 C1 2 100% $ 497,000.00 21-H Palmlra Ave(Proposed Segment( Sea Pines Dr P.,k Rd 22 0.37 C1 2 100% $ 1,536,000.00 $ 9,123,DDD.DD CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. was retained to prepare a Roadway Master Plan and associated Capital Improvement Plans in support of and Impact Fee Study.The total Capital Improvements Plan is estimated at$1.513 to support the projected 10 year growth with the City of Corpus Christi. Based on the net supply of capacity added by the proposed projects, approximately 49% of the projects would be needed to support the new vehicle trips growth. It is anticipated that this Roadway Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan and future Impact Fee Study would be updated every five(5)years based on the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 requirements. A separate report would be developed if detailing the Impact Fee Calculations and Maximum Assessable Fee is the City decides to move forward with Impact Fees for Roadways. I1pape-dawson.comisatpd11231831001TraKiclTraKiclWordlRoadwayCIPReport1230919a1.d0cx 29 pq pE-DAWSON ENGINEERS APPENDICES APPENDIX A Existing Roadway Inventory NORTHWEST I(SERVICE AREA 1)EXISTING ROADWAYS Peak y o Eais[Lanes Designation Hour - Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies 13 N " Roadway From To Length(mi) Servicei NB SB EB WB (Aerials Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr To[alt Pk-Hr To[alt Pk-Hr Veh-Mi3 Pk-Hr Veh-Mi �}W j Ripple Rd Northwert TN IH 37 SB Access Rd 0.14 1 1 Cl 74 100% 360 50 10 40 0 O� z Ripple Rd IH 37 SB Access Rd Sharpsburg Rd 0.09 1 1 Cl 74 100% 360 31 6 24 0 W_ - NorthwestTrl Ripple Rd Burning Tree Ln 0.31 1 1 Cl 73 100% 360 110 22 88 0 - Burning Tree Ln Northwert Trl Calallen Dr 0.031 1 Cl 73 100% 360 11 2 9 0 Mountain MCalallen Dr IH 37 0.22 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 78 0 78 0 `LU Calallen Dr Burning Tree Ln Mou nta in Trl,140'Sof B urning Tree Ln 0.03 1 1 Cl 73 100% 360 10 2 8 0 Calallen Dr Mountain Trl,140'Sof Burning-,Ln WRetlbirtl Ln 0.29 1 1 Cl 73 100% 360 103 21 82 0 3� Calallen Dr WRetlbirtl Ln Teague Ln 0.43 1 1 Cl 290 100% 360 154 124 30 0 8 Calallen Dr Teague Ln IH 69E 0.03 1 1 Cl 290 100% 360 11 9 2 0 W Retlbirtl Ln Calallen Dr IH 37 0.31 1 1 Cl 253 100% 360 111 78 33 0 E Retlbirtl Ln IH 37 Railmatl Ave 0.17 1 1 Cl 24 100% 360 62 4 58 0 Sharpsburg Rd Ripple Rd Up River Rd 1.18 1 1 Cl 48 100% 360 423 57 366 0 Up River Rd Sharpsburg Rd CAH--Rtl1 1 Cl 63 100% 360 325 57 268 0 Up River Rd CAH--Rd Hart Rd 0.60.90 3 1 1 i6 100% 360 225 40 186o Up River Rd Hart Rd Violet Rd 0.69 1 1 Cl 490 100% 360 248 338 -90 90 Up River Rd,5 of IH 37 Violet Rd Mckinzie Rd 0.67 1 1 Cl 99 100% 360 242 66 175 0 Up River Rd,5 of IH 37 Mcginzie Rd Deer Run Dr 0.38 1 1 Cl 146 100% 360 136 55 81 0 Up River Rd,5 of IH 37 Deer Run Dr Rantl Morgan Rd 1.35 1 1 Cl 192 100% 360 488 259 228 0 Up River Rd,N of IH 37 Rantl Morgan Rd 1425'W of N Clark-d Rd OAS 1 1 Cl 198 100% 360 171 90 JJ 0 Teague Ln Wild-Dr Calallen Dr 0.27 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 98 0 98 0 Wilticat Dr Northwert Blvtl Teague Ln 0.31 1 1 Cl 244 100% 360 113 76 36 0 W } Trinity River Dr Northwert Blvtl Wootl River Dr 0.20 1 1 Cl 230 100% 360 72 46 26 0 Wootl River Dr Northwert Blvd Trinity River Dr 0.10 1 1 Cl 447 100% 360 36 45 -9 9 � F 0 Wootl River Dr Trinity River Dr Beal Dr 0.75 1 1 Cl 407 100% 360 268 333 -65 65 Z River Hill Dr Northwert BHtl 135'N of Fairway Dr 0.38 1 1 Cl 286 100% 360 138 110 28 0 W W CR 69 Northwert Blvd 1097'N of Northwert Blvtl 0.21 1 1 Cl 200 100% 360 75 42 33 0 CR 69 Northwert Blvd 1690'S of Northwert Blvtl 0.32 1 1 Cl 200 100% 360 115 60 51 0 \ U Z CR 69 1690'S of Northwert Blvtl CR 52 0.28 1 1 Cl 200 100% 360 101 56 45 0 Northwest Blvtl 1644'W of Wright Moravek Rd Wright Moravek Rd 0.31 2 2 A2 2,243 100% 720 448 698 -250 250 LL Northwest Blvtl Wright Moravek Rd River Trail St 0.40 2 2 A2 2,243 100% 720 574 894 -320 320 AL,U^ d Northwest Blvtl River Trail St ERiverview Dr 0.41 2 2 A2 2,243 100% 720 585 912 -326 326 V/ w 0 Northwest Blvtl ERiverview Dr Wootl River Rd 0.17 2 2 A2 2,243 100% 720 251 391 -140 140 O a Northwest Blvtl Wootl River Rd Trinity River D, FM 1889 0.12 2 2 A2 2,243 100% 720 176 275 -98 98 r V Northwest Blvtl Trinity River Dr/FM 1889 River Hill Dr 0.43 2 2 Al 1,962 100% 540 464 843 -379 379 ` LL w Northwest Blvtl River Hill Dr CR 69 0.42 2 2 A2 3,426 100% 720 601 1,431 -829 829 r Northwest Blvtl CR 69 Riversitle Blvtl 0.27 2 2 A2 3,219 100% 720 389d69 Ldo 480 LU 0 z Northwest Blvtl Riversitle Blvtl Wild-Dr 0.32 2 2 A2 3,219 100% 720 455 1,017 -562 562 7- NorthwestBlvtl Wilticat Dr IH 69E 0.26 3 3 A2 3,533 100% 720 563 921 -358 358 V Hearn Rd Leopartl St 1273'W of Callicoatte Rd 1.38 1 1 Cl 100 100% 360 498 138 360 0 _ Heam Rd 1273'W of Callicoatte Rd Callicoatte Rd 0.24 1 1 Cl 100 100% 360 87 24 63 0 X Leopartl St IH 69E Hearn Rd 0.08 2 2 A2 1,727 50% 720 60 72 -12 12 N W Leopartl St Hearn Rd Union Padfic RR 0.82 2 2 A2 1,397 50% 720 588 571 17 0 O Leopartl St Union Padfic RR Loma Alta Rd 0.37 2 1 A2 1,151 50% 720 197 210 -13 13 Leopartl St Loma Alta Rd Callicoatte Rd 0.56 2 1 A21,278 50% 720 304 360 s56 56 Z FM 1889 Northwert Blvd 765'N of Lake 6rantle Ave 0.40 1 1 Cl 648 100% 360 144 260 -115 115 FM 1889 765'N of Lake 6rantle Ave Lake 6rantle Ave 0.13 1 1 Cl 648 50% 360 23 41 -18 18 FM 1889 765'N of Lake 6rantle Ave 294'S of Valley View Dr 0.10 1 1 Cl 648 50% 360 18 32 -14 14 CR 52 IH 69E 1145'W of IH 69E 0.22 1 1 C2 420 100% 360 79 92 -13 13 Loma Alta Rd Leopartl St 2057'S of Leopartl St 0.39 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 140 0 140 0 Callicoatte Rtl Up I-Rd IH 37 0.24 1 1 Cl 504 100% 360 86 121 -35 35 Callicoatte Rd IH 37 Leopartl St 0.11 1 1 Cl 520 100% 360 38 55 -17 17 Callicoatte Rd Leopartl St Hearn Rd 0.48 1 1 Cl 520 100% 360 172 249 -77 JJ g Callicoatte Rd Heam Rd 2350'5 of Heam rtl 0.40 1 1 Cl 311 100% 360 159 137 22 0 4 Callicoatte Rd 2350'S of H earn rtl 4060'5 of Hearn Rd 0.33 1 1 Cl 311 100% 360 119 103 16 0 Wright Moravek Rd Northwert Blvd1675'5 of Northwert Blvtl 0.32 1 1 Cl 63 100% 360 115 20 95 0HS Wright Moravek Rd 1675'5 of Northwert Blvtl 2245'5 of Northwert Blvtl 0.10 1 1 Cl 63 100% 360 36 6 30HS 0 11,376 12,)59 -1,380 4,277 jc 1.0 A3 O � NORTHWEST 2(SERVICE AREA 2)EXISTING ROADWAYS Peak Hour %In Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Existing S Exist Lanes Designation Veh-Mi Capacity Excess Capacity w Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) Volume Service Supply Demand Deficiencies Q W (Aerial) Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' 14 NB SB EB WB 2021 Area Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi McKinzie Ln McKinzie Rd 315'W of Twin River Blvd 2164 0.41 1 1 1 Cl 82 100% 360 295 34 261 0 lwig McKinzie Ln 315'W of Twin River Blvd 550'E of Twin River Blvd 865 0.16 1 1 Cl 82 50% 360 59 7 52 0 `w - Up River Rd Callicoatte Rd Hart Rd 3303 0.63 1 1 Cl 44 100% 360 450 27 423 0 Up River Rd Hart Rd Violet Rd 3641 0.69 1 1 Cl 90 100% 360 497 62 434 0 `U o Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 Violet Rd Mckinzie Rd 3545 0.67 1 1 Cl 99 100% 360 483 66 417 0 3 z Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 Mckinzie Rd Wood Creek Dr 850 0.16 1 1 Cl 212 100% 360 116 34 82 0 8 Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 Wood Creek Dr Stonewall Dr1155 0.22 1 1 Cl 212 50% 360 79 23 56 0 Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 Stonewall Dr Carbon Plant Rd 1860 0.35 1 1 Cl 212 50% 360 127 37 90 0 Leopard St Callicoatte Rd Woodland Creek Dr 2704 0.51 2 2 A2 1948 100% 720 1,475 997 478 0 Leopard St Woodland Creek Dr Violet Rd 3700 0.70 2 2 A2 1879 100% 720 2,018 1,317 702 0 Leopard St Violet Rd Starlite Ln 2575 0.49 2 2 A2 1916 100% 720 1,405 935 470 0 Leopard St Starlite Ln McKinzie Rd 2301 0.44 2 2 A2 1553 100% 720 1,255 677 578 0 H-.Rd Callicoatte Rd Dunstain St 2640 0.50 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 360 0 Frontier Dr Rockwood St McKinzie Rd 2171 0.41 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 296 0 Will owood Creek Dr Violet Rd Sandy Hollow Creek Dr 2450 0.46 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 334 0 - Haven Dr Violet Rd Widgeon Dr 2040 0.39 1 1 Cl 288 100% 360 278 111 167 0 N Haven Dr Widgeon Dr New PR Roadway 2355 0.45 1 1 C1 288 100% 360 321 129 193 0 Q _ Haven Dr New PR Roadway Warrior 1790 0.34 1 1 Cl 288100% 360 244 98 146 0 Lu } Haven Dr Warrior Mckinzie Rd 3203 0.61 1 1 Cl 288 100% 360 437 175 262 0 Callicoatte Rd Up River Rd IH 37 1270 0.24 11 Cl 72 50% 360 87 9 78 0 Q F 0 Callicoatte Rd IH 37 Leopard St 580 0.11 1 1 Cl 504 50% 360 40 28 12 0 W (� Z Callicoatte Rd Leopard St Hearn Rd 2580 0.49 1 1 Cl 520 50% 360 176 127 49 0 W Callicoatte Rd Hearn Rd New PR E-W Roadway 2360 0.45 1 1 Cl 311 50% 360 161 69 91 0 V = Z Callicoatte Rd New PR E-W Roadway City Limits 1740 0.33 1 1 Cl 311 50% 360 119 51 67 0 N>N U Hart Road Up River Road IH 37 423 1 0.08 1 1 Cl 46 100% 360 58 4 54 0Ll. (n } Woodland Creek Dr Leopard St 580'S of Caliche Creek Dr 2905 0.55 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 396 - - 0 Lu a Violet Rd Up River Rd IH 37 260 0.05 1 1 Cl 1381 100% 360 35 68 -33 33 (n (Lw L Violet Rd IH 37 Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 200 0.04 1 1 Cl 1381 100% 360 27 52 -25 25 Violet Rd Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 Leopard St 1863 0.35 2 2 C3 1381 100% 315 445 487 -43 43 N 0 U 0 0 Violet Rd Leopard St Willowood Creek Dr 3808 0.72 2 2 Al1309 100% 540 1,558 944 614 0 � LL Violet Rd Willowood Creek Dr Starlite Ln 1577 0.30 2 2 Al 456 100% 540 645 136 509 0 (n 0 Ur Violet Rd Starlite Ln New PR E-W Roadway 1807 0.34 1 1 Cl 382 100% 360 246 131 116 0 W } Z Violet Rd New PR E-W Roadway Haven Dr 1085 0.21 1 1 Cl 382 100% 360 148 79 69 0 F Violet Rd Haven Dr City Limits 1270 0.24 1 1 Cl 382 100% 360 173 92 81 0 = U (n Session Rd McKinzie Rd IH 37 1922 0.36 1 1 Cl 57 100% 360 262 21 241 0 X Starlite Ln Leopard St Sunny Dr 3655 0.69 1 1 Cl 294 100% 360 498 203 295 0 N W Starlite Ln Sunny Dr Viol et Rd 2047 0.39 1 1 Cl 41 100% 360 279 16 263 0 LOL Rockwood St/Warrior Frontier Dr Haven Dr 2250 0.43 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 307 - - 0 z McKinzie Rd Sessions Rd Mckinzie Ln 2632 0.50 1 1 Cl 341 100% 360 359 170 189 0 McKinzie Rd Mckinzie Ln IH 37 1043 0.20 1 1 Cl 341 100% 360 142 67 75 0 McKinzie Rd IH 37 Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 390 0.07 2 2 Al 1307 100% 540 160 97 63 0 McKinzie Rd Up River Rd,Sof IH 37 Creek View Dr 950 0.18 2 2 Al 1307 100% 540 389 235 153 0 McKinzie Rd Creek View Dr Leopard St 1595 0.30 2 2 Al 1300 50% 540 326 196 130 0 McKinzie Rd Leopard St Frontier Dr 1780 0.34 2 2 Al 944 50% 540 364 159 205 0 McKinzie Rd Frontier Dr Haven Dr 2235 0.42 2 2 Al 522 50% 540 457 111 347 0 McKinzie Rd Haven Dr New PR E-W Roadway 1 2615 0.50 1 1 Cl 351 50% 360 178 87 91 0 a McKinzie Rd New PR E-W Roadway 1 New PR E-W Roadway 2 2685 0.51 1 1 Cl 351 50% 360 183 89 94 0 McKinzie Rd New PR E-W Roadway2 City Limits 2835 0.54 1 1 Cl 351 50% 360 193 94 99 .23 0 T 18,586 8,511 HS 8,382 100 HS Jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ NORTHWEST 3(SERVICE AREA 3(EXISTING ROADWAYS 1S Lut Peak Hour In ` ¢ Roatlwa From To Length i[ Length Exis[Lanes Designation Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Exress Capacity Existing Deficiencies 3 z y g (( g (mi( Volume Service (Aerial( Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr To[al� Pk-Hr Veh-Mi3 Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 8 w NB SB EB WR 2021 Area Up River Rd S of IH 37 Wood Creek Dr Deer Run 1160 0.22 1 1 Cl 212 50% 360 79 23 56 0 Up River Rd S of IH 37 Deer Run Rand Morgan Rd 7150 1.35 1 1 Cl 223 100% 360 975 302 673 0 Stonewall Dr Charles Dr Deer Run Dr 471 0.09 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 64 0 Leopard St MCKinzie Rd Charles Dr 1600 0.30 2 2 A2 1,466 100% 720 873 444 429 0 Leopard St Charles Dr Buckingham St 6301 1.19 2 2 A2 1,263 100% 720 3,437 1,507 1,930 0 Leopard St Buckingham St Rand Morgan Rd 1701 0.32 2 2 A2 1,118 100% 720 928 360 568 0 Leopard St Rand Morgan Rd N Clarkwood Rd 4188 0.79 2 2 A2 657 100% 720 2,284 521 1,763 0 Oregon Trl Rhumba TH -d Morgan Rd 1954 0.37 1 1 1 Cl NOCounts 1 100% 360 266 0 TX 44 Rand Morgan Rd FM 2292 2465 0.47 22 Al 297 100% 540 1,009 134 974 0 M TX 44 FM 2292 NClarkwood Rd 1345 0.25 2 2 Al 297 100% 540 550 73 477 0 CR 36 Gaviota St SClarkwood Rd 1762 0.33 1 1 Cl No Counts 50% 360 120 0 Q _ MCKinzie Rd Creek View Dr Leopard St 1595 0.30 2 2 Al 1,300 50% 540 326 196 130 0 W } MCKinzie Rd Leopard St Frontier Dr 1790 0.34 2 2 Al 944 50% 540 364 159 205 0 MCKinzie Rd Frontier Dr Haven Dr 2235 0.42 2 2 Al 522 50% 540 457 111 347 0 Q F 0 MCKinzie Rd Haven Dr NewPR E-W Roadway 1 2615 0.50 1 1 Cl 351 50% 360 179 97 91 0 W D Z MCKinzie Rd New PR E Roadway 1 New PR E-W Roadway 2 2695 0.51 1 1 Cl 351 50% 360 193 99 94 0 W MCKinzie Rd New PR E Roadway2 City Limits 2935 0.54 1 1 Cl 351 50% 360 1 193 94 1 99 0 U Charles Dr Stonewall Dr Leopard St 1645 0.31 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 224 - - 0 > (� Z Deer Run Up River Rd Stonewall Dr 1430 0.27 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 195 - - 0 N } Rand Morgan Rd Up River Rd,140'N of IH 37 IH 37 140 0.03 1 1 Cl 981 100% 360 19 26 -7 7 Rand Morgan Rd IH 37 Up River Rd,180'S of IH 37 180 0.03 1 1 Cl 981 100% 360 25 33 -9 9 ,W,^ d Rand Morgan Rd Up River Rd,180'S of IH 37 Leopard St 2965 0.56 1 1 Cl 981 100% 360 404 551 -146 146 v/ w Q Rand Morgan Rd Leopard St OregonTH 2348 0.44 1 1 Cl 868 100% 360 320 386 -66 66 M 0 Q Rand Morgan Rd Oregon TH 1540'S of MCNorton Rd 0.69 1 1 Cl 328 100% 360 497 226 270 0 V 0 Rand Morgan Rtl 1540'Sof MCNorton Rtl 3565'Sof MCNorton Rd 0.38 1 1 Cl 328 100% 360 274 125 149 0 ��,n^ LL Rand Morgan Rd 3565'Sof MCNorton Rd 4785'Sof MCNorton Rd 0.23 1 1 Cl 328 100% 360 166 75 90 0 v/ 0 (' Rand Morgan Rtl 4785'Sof MCNorton Rd 2650'N of Agnes St 0.60 1 1 Cl 328 100% 360 432 197 235 0 W F Z Rand Morgan Rtl 2650'N of Agnes St Agnes St 0.50 1 1 Cl 321 100% 360 360 161 199 0 F N Clarkwood Rd Leopard St 3260'N of Setlwick Rd 0.80 1 1 Cl 70 50% 360 288 28 260 0 N Clarkwood Rd 3260'N of Setlwick Rd Setlwick Rd 0.62 1 1 Cl 36 50% 360 223 11 212 0 X N Clarkwood Rd Setlwick Rd Alpine St 0.51 1 1 Cl 36 50% 360 184 9 174 0 N W NClarkwood Rd Alpine St 1070'Sof Alpine St 0.20 1 1 Cl 36 50% 360 72 4 68 0 LOL S Clarkwood Rd Agnes St 1X44 0.25 1 1 Cl 291 100% 360 183 74 109 0 S Clarkwood Rd TX 44 CR 36 0.76 1 1 Cl 194 100% 360 549 147 401 0 z ISClarkwood Rtl CR 36 McGloin Rd 0.43 1 1 Cl 194 100% 360 312 84 228 0 17,D14 6,238 9,9D5 228 'z H. HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ a c� CC AIRPORT I(SERVICE AREA 4)EXISTING ROADWAYS Q 1Z, a 1z Peak Hour E,``r E.i.Lanes Desgnation %In Service Veh-Mi C.p.sity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand E.sess Capacity E-ing Deficiencies w Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) Volume 3 �Aerial� 2021 Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Totalr Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 8 w NB SB EB WB 2 Leopard St Ndarkwood Rd Tulom Rd 4288 0.81 2 2 A2 602 10 6 720 2,339 489 1,850 Leopard St Tuloso Rd Suntlde Rd 1266 0.24 2 2 A2 602 100% 720 691 144 546 Leopard St Suntlde Rd Rhew Rd 1228 0.23 2 2 A2 585 106 720 670 136 534 Leopard St Rhew Rd Southern Minerals Rd 5074 0.96 2 2 A2 585 106 720 2,768 562 2,205 Leopard St Southern Minerals Rd Corn Product,Rd 5824 1.10 2 2 A2 577 106 720 3,177 637 2,540 Leopard St Corn Product,Rd Berrys Rd/N Lexington Blvd 2680 0.51 2 2 A2 577 5M 720 731 146 584 Leopard St Berrys Rd/N Lerington Blvd Lantana St 2706 0.51 2 2 Al 684 5M 540 554 175 378 88 Leopard St Lantana St NPadre Island Dr 782 0.15 2 3 Al 684 5M 540 200 51 149 Sedwlck Rd N darkwood Rd Manning Rd 4165 0.79 1 1 Cl 11 10 6 360 568 9 559 Sedwlck Rd Manning Rd Rhew Rd 2045 0.39 1 1 Cl 11 106 360 279 4 275 Sedwlck Rd Rhew Rd Southern Minerals Rd 4547 0.86 1 1 Cl 11 106 360 620 10 610 Alpine St Ndarkwood Rd Manning Rd 4161 0.79 1 1 C2 0 10 6 300 473 0 473 Q _ Hopkins Rd Railroad Corn Product,Rd 2699 0.51 1 1 Cl 128 10 6 360 368 65 - W } Hopkins Rd Corn Product,Rd NLerington Blvd 5318 1.01 1 1 Cl I 10 6 360 725 47 678 Agnes St Talbert Rd Helnmhn Rd 3022 0.57 2 2 A2 68 106 720 1,648 39 1,609 F 0 Ag-St Helnsohn Rd NPadre Island Dr 2796 0.53 2 2 A2 52 10 6 720 1,525 28 1,498 V N darkwood Rd Alpine St Sed-k Rd 2678 0.51 1 1 Cl 45 5M 360 183 11 171W Lu Ndarkwood Rd Sedwlck Rd 870'5 of Caroline Rd 3270 0.62 1 1 Cl 36 5M 360 223 11 212 U Ndarkwood Rd 870'5 of Caroline Rd Leopard St 4250 0.80 1 1 Cl 70 5M 360 290 28 262 V Z N darkwood Rd Leopard St IH 37 2402 0.45 1 1 Cl 45 5M 360 164 10 154 Ndarkwood Rd IH 37 Up River Rd 1120 0.21 1 1 Cl 71 5M 360 76 8 69 j a Up River Rd 970'--f N darkwood Rd N 0--d Rd 970 0.18 1 1 Cl 196 10 6 360 132 36 96 W d Up River Rd Ndarkwood Rd 1110'Eastof N darkwood Rd 1110 0.21 1 1 Cl 179 10 6 360 151 38 114 ,,/^� Tul oso Rd Up River Rd IH 37 1244 0.24 1 1 Cl 132 106 360 170 31 139 V/ w 0 Tul oso Rd IH 37 Leopard St 2444 0.46I 1 Cl 116 106 360 333 54 280 O Q Suntlde Rd Up River Rd IH 37 1211 0.23 1 1 Cl 283 106 360 165 65 100 LL Suntlde Rd IH 37 Leopard St 2462 0.47 1 1 Cl 248 106 360 336 115 220 r Southern Minerals Rd Up River Rd IH 37 2601 0.49 1 1 Cl 198 106 360 355 97 257 O Southern Minerals Rd IH 37 Leopard St 1308 1 0.25 1 1 Cl 232 106 360 178 57 121 O Z Southern Minerals Rd Leopard St Sedwlck Rd 2530 0.48 1 1 Cl 75 106 360 345 36 309 F F N Lering-Blvd Leopard St Lantana St 3302 0.63 1 1 Cl 139 10 6 360 450 87 363 Ln Lering-Blvd Lantana St Hopkins Rd 1470 0.28 1 1 Cl 139 10 6 360 200 39 162 LL X Lantana St Leopard St NLerington Rd 2558 0.48 1 1 Cl 255 106 360 349 123 225 Q W Corn Produce Rd IH 37 Leopard St 1637 0.31 2 2 A2 450 106 720 893 140 753 Corn Produce Rd Leopard St Hopkins Rd 4879 0.92 1 1 Cl 125 106 360 665 116 549 Manning Rd Sedwlck Rd Alpine Rd 2664 0.50 1 1 Cl 21 106 360 363 11 353 U Manning Rd Alpine Rd Railroad 2922 0.55 1 1 Cl 21 106 360 398 12 387 Manning Rd Railroad T%A4 210 0.04 1 1 Cl 21 106 360 29 1 28 Rhew Rd Leopard St 5=dwlck Rd 4657 0.88 1 1 Cl 0 106 360 635 0 635 Bronm Rd Sedwlck Rd Railroad5564 1.05 1 1 Cl 53 106 360 759 56 703 B,.,,.Rd Railroad T%A4 269 0.05 1 1 Cl 53 106 360 37 3 34 25,219 3,726 21,988 o IRS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW CC AIRPORT 2(SERVICE AREA 5)EXISTING ROADWAYS Peak EA.L.— Designation Hour bIn Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Ezcess CzpacRy EA.ing Deficiencies Roadway From To Length(k) Length(mi) Service (Aerial) Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi NB SB EB WB 2021 FM 665 N Padre Island Dr Jr Beck Dr 3135 0.59 1 1 Cl 688 50% 360 214 204 9 0 FM 665 Jr Beck Dr Joe Mire.,Rd(New Segment) 660 0.13 1 1 Cl 683 50% 360 45 43 2 0 FM 665 Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) Heinsohn Rd(New Segment) 2110 0.40 1 1 Cl 683 50% 360 144 137 7 0 FM 665 Heinsohn Rd(New Segment) Westside New Segment 2845 0.54 1 1 Cl 683 50% 360 194 184 10 0 �W�y/ FM 665 Westside New Segment Saratoga Blvd 2880 0.55 1 1 Cl 683 50% 360 196 186 10 0 LL O Talbert Rd(NS) IJ.e Mi,eur Rd TX 44 4103 0.78 1 1 Cl 100% 360 560 0 560 0 Q F F Bear Ln Joe Mireur Rd Hensohn Rd 4843 0.92 11 Cl 1 41 100% 360 660 37 623 0 Z Bear Ln Hensohn Rd Junior Beck Dr 2464 0.47 1 1 C1 41 100% 360 336 19 317 0 W = j Bear Ln Junior Beck Dr N Padre Island Dr 610 0.12 1 1 Cl 391 100% 360 83 45 38 0 V Z Heinsohn RD Agnes St TX 44 1390 0.26 C1 23 100% 360 0 6 -6 6 > V Heinsohn RD TX-44 Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segment 1275 0.24 1 1 C1 23 100% 360 174 5 168 0 j }Q Heinsohn RD Talbert Ln(EW)Proposed Segment Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) 2580 0.49 Cl 23 100% 360 0 11 -11 11 W,^ Heinsohn RD Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) Bear In 2605 0.49 Cl 23 100% 360 0 11 -11 11 V/ w 0 Joe Mireur Rd TX 44 Talbert Ln 2522 0.48 1 1 C1 16 100% 360 344 8 336 0 a Joe Mi—,Rd Talbert Ln Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) 2490 0.47 Cl 16 100% 360 0 7 -7 7 (V V O Joe Mireur Rd Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) Bear In 2650 0.50 1 1 Cl 16 100% 360 361 8 353 0 LL Junior Beck Dr Bear Ln New Roadway Segment 2700 0.51 1 1 Cl 100% 360 368 0 368 0 O Junior Beck Dr New Roadway Segment FM 665 2315 0.44 Cl 100% 360 0 0 0 0O F Z 3,679 912 2,768 35 a U X a W U U 1-410 HS HS jc 1.0 `a3 ho,ww � WESTSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 6)EXISTING ROADWAYS Exist Lanes Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-MiT.tal Er cess Capacity Existing Deficiencies 13N o Roadway From To Length(R) Length(..) Designation(Aeri.1) Peak Hour Volume Yin Service Area NB SB EB WB Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr PIH,Veh-Mi Pk-Hr Veh-Mi m w GreenLu wo otl Dc SH 358 Tmla.Dr 1320 0.25 2 2 Al 1658 100% 540 540 414 126 0 % 6reenwootl Dr -p.Dr WPoint Rd 1690 0.32 2 2 Al 1658 100% 540 691 531 161 0 9L z 6reenwootl Dr WPoint Rtl 6ollihar Rd 1003 0.19 2 2 Al 1199 100% 540 410 228 183 0 - 6ree.-dDr 6ollihar Rd Home Rd 2640 0.50 2 2 Al 923 100% 540 1,080 462 618 0 W w - Greenwo otl Dr Home Rd Tarlto.St 3960 0.75 2 2 0 927 100% 315 945 695 250 0 `�Z - 6ree.-d Dr Tarlton St Ba ltlwi.Blvtl 2640 0.50 2 2 C3 569 100% 315 630 284 346 0 Lu G ree.wo otl Dr Baltlwin Blvtl SPort Ave 1109 0.21 2 2 C3 316 100% 315 265 66 198 0 W Point Rd SH 358 Angela Dr 2218 0.42 1 1 Cl 369 100% 360 302 155 148 0 3 W Point Rd Angela Dr Columbia St 1901 0.36 1 1 Cl 369 100% 360 259 133 127 0 2 W Point Rd Columbia St 6reenwootl Dr 1426 0.27 1 1 Cl 459 100% 360 190 124 J0 0 Trolan Dr 6reenwootl Dr Caste...St 1359 0.26 1 1 Cl 427 100% 360 185 110 75 0 Trolan Dr Castenon St T%286 2712 0.51 1 1 Cl 427 100% 360 370 219 151 0 Castenon St Trolan Dr Castenon St N 2056 0.39 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 280 0 6ollihar Rd 6reenwootl Dr T%286 4130 0.78 2 2 Al 562 100% 540 1,690 439 1,250 0 Columbia St SH 358 W Point Rd 2231 0.42 1 1 Cl 304 100% 360 300 128 176 0 Columbia St W Point Rd Horne Rd 4291 0.81 1 1 Cl 366 100% 360 585 297 288 0 Airport Rd Home Rd Old Brownsville Rd 5016 0.95 2 2 C3 496 100% 315 1,197 471 726 0 Airport Rd Old Brownsville Rd Santa Elena St 1620 0.31 2 2 C3 804 100% 315 387 247 140 0 _ Airport Rd Santa Elena St Baltlwin Blvtl 1396 0.26 2 2 C3 326 100% 315 333 86 247 0 Airport Rd Baltlwin Blvd Agnes St 1326 0.25 2 2 C3 591 100% 315 316 148 168 0 Old Robstone Rd Agnes St Up River Rd 4119 0.78 1 1 C2 610 100% 300 468 476 -8 8 - Old Robstone Rd Up River Rd Leopartl St 842 0.16 1 1 C2 476 100% 300 96 76 20 0 N.eces Bay Blvtl Leopartl St Butltly Lawrence Blvtl 862 0.16 2 2 C3 334 100% 315 206 54 151 0 Lu O N.eces Bay Blvtl Butltly Lawrence Blvtl 1-37 942 0.18 2 2 C3 334 100% 315 225 60 165 0 yI Leopartl Street Corn Pmtl.Rs Rd Benys Rd 2691 0.512 2 A2 684 50% 720 730 174 559 0 Q (n Z Leopartl Street 13-y,Rd Lantana Rd 2692 0.51 2 2 Al 684 50% 540 551 174 376 0W W W Leopartl Street Lantana Rd SH 358 746 0.14 2 2 Al 684 50% 540 153 48 1000 Leopartl Street SH 358 MCBritle Ln 1731 0.33 2 2 Al 1056 100% 540 708 346 362 0 U (� Z Leopartl Street MCBritle In Nansas City S..them Railway Tack 2212 0.42 2 2 Al 1012 100% 540 905 424 481 0 opaj a Lertl Street K--City S..them Railway Tack N Navigation Blvtl 900 O.1J 2 2 A2 1225 100% 720 491 209 282 0 Leopartl Street N Navigation Blvtl Batllwin Blvtl 462 0.09 2 2 Al 1314 100% 540 189 115 74 0W I 0 Leopartl Street -16i.Blvtl Up River Rd 5764 1.09 2 2 Al 722 100% 540 2,358 788 1,570 0 ,^ Leopartl Street Up River Rd Old Robstown Rtl 1840 0.35 2 2 Al 476 100% 540 753 166 587 0 V, Q Q Leopartl Street Old Robstown Rd Nueces Bay Blvtl 191 0.04 2 2 Al 349 100% 540 78 13 66 0 L) O Leopartl Street Nueces Bay Blvtl Butltly Lawrence Blvtl 1778 0.34 2 2 A2 349 100% 720 970 118 852 0 LL x Leopartl Street Butltly Lawrence Blvtl NPort Ave 2477 0.47 22 Al 450 100% 540 1,013 211 802 0 W 0 Leopartl Street N Port Ave 65'East of Antelope St 1362 0.26 2 2 Al 450 100% 540 557 116 441 0 o F z Up River Rd Dunn Mea.y rd Lantana Rd 1198 0.23 1 1 C3 234 50% 315 71 27 45 0 ,^ Up River Rd Lantana Rd MCBritle Ln 3004 0.64 1 1 C3 280 50% 315 203 90 113 0 V`/ V Up River Rd MCBritle In K--City S..them Railway Tack 1113 0.21 1 1 C3 272 50% 315 66 29 38 0 r,^ X Up River Rd K--City Southem Railway Tack N Navigation Blvtl 798 0.15 1 1 C3 272 50% 315 48 21 27 0 V/ W Up River Rd N Navigation Blvtl 1-37 4398 0.83 1 1 Cl 260 50% 360 300 108 191 0 W Up River Rd 1-37 Leopartl St 3676 0.70 2 2 C3 416 100% 315 877 289 588 0 Up River Rd Leopartl St Old Robstown Rd 1253 0.24 ii C3 398 100% 315 299 95 200 0 Up River Rd Old Robstown Rtl Palm Dr 3051 0.58 2 2 C3 440 100% 315 728 254 474 0 Lipa.St Palm Dr N Port Ave 1324 0.25 2 2 C3 287 100% 315 316 72 240 0 Lipa.St N Port Ave N 19th St 1450 0.27 ii C3 298 100% 315 346 82 260 0 Lipa.St N 19th St T%286 1084 0.21 2 2 C3 298 100% 315 259 61 197 0 Comanche St T%286 N19th St 1455 0.28 1 1 Cl 465 100% 360 198 128 70 0 Comanche St N17 St NPort Ave 1449 0.27 1 1 Cl 465 100% 360 198 128 70 0 Comanche St NPort Ave Lipa.St 1462 0.28 1 1 Cl 65100% 360 1 199 129 71 0 N 19th St Lipa.St Comanche St 677 0.13 1 1 Cl 225 100% 360 92 29 63 0 N 19th St Comanche St 275'N of Laretlo St 1543 0.29 1 1 Cl 225 100% 360 210 66 145 0 Ap,121 S 19th St 275'N of Laretlo St Laretlo St 275 0.05 1 1 Cl 225 100% 360 38 12 26 0 S 19th St Laretlo St Agnes St 332 0.06 1 1 Cl 225100% 360 45 14 31 0 S 19th St Agnes St Ruth St 1459 0.28 1 1 Cl 467 100% 360199 129 70 0HS HS Jc 1.0 `a3 O � S19[h St Ruth St Morgan Ave 1724 0.33 1 1 Cl 467 100% 360 235 153 83 0 Morgan Ave T%286 S19th St 698 0.13 2 2 A2 889 100% 720 381 118 263 0 Morgan Ave S19th St SP.rt Ave 2287 0.43 2 2 Al 889 100% 540 936 385 550 0 Morgan Ave SPort Ave Baltlwin Blvtl 2600 0.49 2 2 C3 793 100% 315 620 390 230 0 Morgan Ave Mc-BWCheyenne St 506 0.10 2 2 C3 746 100% 315 121 71 49 0 �' a� Morgan Ave Cheyenne St Airport Rd 2828 0.54 2 2 C3 JOJ 100% 315 675 379 296 0 Old 13-.will,Rd Airport Rd 1351'Wof Airport Rd 1351 0.26 2 2 Al 883 100% 540 553 226 327 0 Old Brownsville Rd 1529'W Airport Rd Omaha Dr 2782 0.53 2 2 Al 883 100% 540 1,138 465 673 0 0 Old Brownsville Rd Omaha Dr Bear L. 766 0.15 2 2 Al 834 100% 540 313 121 192 0 o z Old Brownsville Rd Bear L. Home Rd 1373 0.26 2 2 Al 834 100% 540 562 217 345 0 w Old Brownsville Rd Home Rd Cliff Mans Dr 1265 0.24 2 2 Al 1264 100% 540 518 303 215 0 3" Old Brownsville Rd Cliff Mans Dr SH 358 2240 0.42 2 2 Al 1264 100% 540 916 536 380 0 8� Lantana Rd Up River Rd 1-37 3909 0.74 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 533 0 Lantana Rd 1-37 Skyline Dr 516 0.10 1 1 Cl 255 100% 360 70 25 45 0 Lantana Rd Skyline Dr Leopartl St 1840 0.35 1 1 Cl 255 100% 360 251 89 162 0 H.me Rd T%286 Greenwootl Dr 3753 0.71 2 2 Al 1395 100% 540 1,535 991 544 0 H ome Rd Greenwootl Dr Airport Rd 2261 0.43 2 2 Al 1037 100% 540 925 444 481 0 H ome Rd Airport Rd Angela Dr 2800 0.53 2 2 Al 501 100% 540 1,145 266 880 0 Home Rd Angela Dr Old Brownsville Rd 1603 0.30 2 2 Al 501 100% 540 656 152 504 0 S Navigation Blvtl Old 13-..vi116 Rd Bear L. 1054 0.20 1 1 Al 496 100% 540 216 99 117 0 S Navigation Blvtl Bear L. NGreen Tree Dr 1524 0.29 1 1 Al 499 100% 540 312 144 168 0 S Navigation Blvtl N Green Tree Dr 2917'N of Bear L. 1075 0.20 1 1 Al 242 100% 540 220 49 171 0 S Navigation 131W2917'N of Bear L. Santa Elena St 2570 0.49 1 1 Al 242 100% 540 526 118 408 0 S Navigation Blvtl Santa Elena St Agnes St 2664 0.50 1 1 Al 484 100% 540 545 244 301 0 } S Navigation Blvtl Agnes St Leopartl St 4175 0.79 1 1 Al 367 100% 540 854 290 563 0 W 0 S Navigation 131WLeopartl St 1-37 2367 0.45 2 2 Al 593 100% 540 968 266 703 0 _ S Navigation Blvtl 1-37 Up River Rd 2090 0.40 2 2 Al 140 100% 540 855 55 800 0 F F MCBritle L. Up River Rd 1-37 2400 0.45 1 1 Cl 79 100% 360 327 36 291 0 Q Ln Z MCBritle L. 1-37 Leopartl St 2536 0.48 1 1 Cl 208 100% 360 346 100 246 0 W W W MCBritle L. Leopartl St Agnes St 4278 0.81 1 1 Cl JJ 100% 360 583 63 521 0 Flat.Rd Agnes St 2601'Sof Flat.Rd 2601 0.49 1 1 Cl 153 100% 360 355 75 279 0 V Z Flat.Rd 2601'Sof Flat.Rd Ningpin Dr 332 0.06 1 1 Cl 153 100% 360 45 10 36 0 } Flat.Rd Kingpin Dr Bates St 2259 0.431 1 Cl 153 100% 360 308 65 243 0 I Q Flat.Rd Bates St Bear L. 2606 0.49 1 1 Cl 153 100% 360 355 76 280 0 W d -ha Dr Baltlwin Blvtl Agnes St 2650 0.50 1 1 Cl 62 100% 360 361 31 330 0 ,^ Q Mc-131WLeopartl St Omaha Dr 1982 0.38 2 2 Al 500 100% 540 811 188 623 0 V/ 0 Q Mc-131W Om aha Dr Agnes St 3815 0.72 2 2 Al 608 100% 540 1,561 440 1,121 0 V 0 Baltlwin Blvtl Agnes St Airport Rd 1510 0.29 2 2 Al 729 100% 540 618 209 409 0 LL Baltlwin Blvtl Airport Rd Morgan Ave 3650 0.69 2 2 Al 1033 100% 540 1,493 714 779 0 W 0 0 Baltlwin Blvtl Morgan Ave Greenwootl Dr 2323 0.44 2 2 Al 1368 100% 540 950 602 348 0 Q } Z Baltlwin Blvtl Greenwootl Dr SPort Ave 628 0.12 2 2 Al 1368 100% 540 257 163 94 0 F F Mc-131WSP.rt Ave T%286 1832 0.35 2 2 Al 1190 100% 540 749 413 337 0 `, LnHighl--!Ave Morgan Ave SP.rt Ave 3207 0.61 1 1 Cl 101 100% 360 437 61 376 0 r,^ X Ruth St S Port Ave S 19th St 2303 0.44 1 1 Cl N.C...ts 100% 360 314 - - 0 VW, W Cheyenne St. Morgan Ave Ta It..St 2602 0.49 1 1 Cl 95 100% 360 355 47 308 0 LU Ta It..St Cheyenne St. Greenwootl Dr 1425 0.27 1 1 Cl 458 100% 360 194 124 71 0 Ta It..St Greenwootl Dr SP.rt Ave 2094 0.40 ii Cl 458 100% 360 286 181 104 0 Ta It..St SP.rt Ave T%286 361 0.07 1 1 Cl 652 100% 360 49 45 5 0 Bear Ln T%358 Flat.Rd 2334 0.44 2 2 Al 448 100% 540 955 198 757 0 Bear L. Flat.Rtl Cliff Maus Dr 2059 0.39 2 2 Al 448 100% 540 842 175 668 0 Bear L. Cliff Maus Dr Navigation Blvtl 624 0.12 2 2 Al 448 100% 540 255 53 202 0 Bear Ln Navigation Blvtl Old Brownsville Rd 1396 0.26 22 Al 448 100% 540 571 118 453 0 Kingpin Dr T%358 Flat.Rtl 2590 0.49 1 1 Cl N.C...ts 100% 360 353 0 Bates Rd T%358 Flat.Rd 2571 0.49 1 1 Cl 70 100% 360 351 34 317 0 Cliff Maus Dr Bear L. Old Brownsville Rd 1683 0.32 2 2 Cl 217 100% 360 459 69 390 0 s Cliff Maus Dr OItl BQ wnry ille Rd T%358 3466 0.66 2 2 C 217 100% 360 945 143 803 0 Angela Dr H...e Rd W Point Rd 3968 0.75 1 1 Cl N.C...ts 100% 360 541 N Port Ave W 13-c ay St IH 37 3048 0.58 1 1 Cl 264 50% 360 208 76 132 0 AS N Port Ave IH 37 Leopartl St 630 0.12 2 2 C3 474 100% 315 150 57 94 0 AS Jc 1.0 `a3 NPort Ave L-p-St Lipa.St 1036 0.20 2 2 0 608 100% 315 247 119 128 0 O,w NP.rt Ave Lip-St Comanche St 667 0.13 2 2 1 C3 627 100% 315 159 79 80 0 NPort Ave Comanche St Agnes St 2000 0.38 2 2 1 C3 736 100% 315 477 279 199 0 5 Port Ave Agnes St Ruth St 1562 0.30 2 2 C3 832 100% 315 373 246 127 0 SP.rt Ave Ruth St Morgan Ave 1726 0.33 2 2 C3 1167 100% 315 412 382 30 0 Lu ' SP.rt Ave Morgan Ave Green—d Dr 310 0.06 2 2 C3 1296 100% 315 74 76 -2 2 O W o 5 Port Ave Green—d Dr Raltlwi.Md 1280 0.24 2 2 C3 1068 100% 315 306 260 47 0 2 _ S P.rt Ave Raltlwi.Md Tarpon St 3007 0.57 2 2 C3 1210 100% 315 718 689 29 0 S Port Ave Tarpon St T%286 769 0.15 2 2 C3 1364 100% 315 184 199 -15 15 VI _ 62,026 24,057 35,948 25 1 Z LU cc a r W aLnz LU w U = z U _ � 7 Q W w 0 U Q LL W O C7 oF Z U y ~ LU XW W k HS HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ WESTSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA])EXISTING ROADWAYS Peak Hour %In Q�V Length Length EA.Lanes Designation Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Exirting Deficiencies Roadway From To Volume Service _ (ft) (mi) NB SB EB Wg based on Aerial 2021 Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi W Greenwood Dr Saratoga Blvd Lands Rd 1320 0.25 ii Al 376 100% 540 540 94 446 0 3" Greenwood Dr Lands Rd Gavilan St 1650 0.31 2 2 Al 3]6 100% 540 6]0 11] 553 0 8 Greenwood Dr Gavilan St Frio st 186 0.04 2 2 Al 376 100% 540 86 15 71 0 Greenwood Dr Frio St Holly Rd 2157 0.41 2 2 Al 743 100% 540 886 305 581 0 Greenwood Dr HollyRd 1500'N of Holly Rd 1500 0.28 2 2 Al 1076 100% 540 605 301 304 0 Greenwood Dr 1500'N of Holly Rd SH 358 2402 0.46 2 2 Al 1076 100% 540 994 495 499 0 Greenwood Dr ISaratoga Blvd New Road(S of Saratoga) 2637 0.5 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 360 0 Greenwood Dr New Road(S of Saratoga) 2250'S of New Road(Sof Saratoga) 2250 0.43 1 1 Cl IN.Counts 100% 360 310 0 Greenwood Dr 2250'Sof New Road(Sof Saratoga) Greenwood Dr Eat Rd 35]] 0.68 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 490 0 Saratoga Blvd Old Brownsville Rd CR 37 3223 0.61 1 1 Cl 421 50% 360 220 128 91 0 _ Saratoga Blvd Jurica Rd CR 35 3702 0.] 1 1 Cl 421 50% 360 252 147 105 0 Saratoga Blvd CR 35 Calle Las Colonial 2390 0.45 1 1 Cl 421 50% 360 162 95 67 0 r Saratoga Blvd Calle Las Colonial 2]5'West of CII Cuernavaca 1175 0.22 1 1 Cl 421 50% 360 79 46 33 0 Saratoga Blvd 2]5'West of CII Cuernavaca CII Cuernavaca 275 0.05 2 1 Cl 421 100% 360 54 21 33 0 W 0 Saratoga Blvd Cil Cuernavaca Greenwood Dr 1465 0.28 2 2 Al 421 100% 540 605 118 487 0 Saratoga Blvd Greenwood Dr 1866'East of Greenwood Dr 1866 0.35 2 2 Al 421 100% 540 756 147 609 0 Z Saratoga Blvd 1866'East of Greenwood Dr TX 286 2238 0.42 2 2 Al 421 100% 540 90] 1]] ]30 0 Calle Las Colonial Saratoga Blvd CII San carios 1321 0.25 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 180 - 0 _ LUZ lands Rd Greenwood Dr 600'East of Harwick Dr 1300 0.25 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 180 - - 0 - Gavilan St Greenwood Dr Los Robles St 1197 0.23 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 166 - - 0 U V Los Robles St Gavilan St Holly Rd 2391 0.45 1 1 Cl 41 100% 360 324 19 305 0 j a Frio St Greenwood Dr Hacala St 2033 0.39 1 1 Cl 51 100% 360 281 20 261 0 LL Hacala St Frio St Dorado St 311 0.06 1 1 Cl 51 100% 360 43 3 40 0 Wn w Q Dorado St Hacala St Martin St 671 0.13 1 1 Cl 51 100% 360 94 ] 87 0 �) 0 a Martin St Dorado St Holly Rd 1422 0.27 1 1 Cl 161 100% 360 194 43 151 0 NV Martin St Dorado St 136'S of Seretariat St 1534 0.29 1 1 Cl 161 100% 360 209 47 162 0 LL W Holly Rd Los Robles St Greenwood Dr 1131 0.21 1 1 Cl 169 100% 360 151 36 116 0 W 0 0 Holly Rd Greenwood Dr Martin St 2630 0.5 1 1 Cl 349 100% 360 360 175 185 0 0 >- Z Holly Rd Marin St TX 286 16]] 0.28 1 1 Cl 349 1 100% 360 202 98 104 0 Fn F Bush St Los Robles St SH 358 46190.8] 1 1 Cl 150 100% 360 626 131 496 0 U U)Silverberry Dr SH 358 End of Silverberry Dr 1312 0.25 1 1 C2 No Counts 100% 300 150 - - 0 X Old Brownsville Rd SH 358 158'N of Jr Beck Dr 3142 0.6 1 1 Cl 688 50% 360 216 207 9 0 W W Old Brownsville Rd 158'N of Jr Beck Dr Holly Rd Extension 655 0.12 1 1 Cl 344 50% 360 43 21 23 0 LU Old Brownsville Rd Holly Rd Extension New Road EW 2 2108 0.4 1 1 Cl 342 50% 360 144 68 76 0 Old Brownsville Rd New Road EW 2 New Road EW 1 2859 0.54 11 Cl 342 50% 360 194 92 102 0 Old Brownsville Rd New Road EW 1 Saratoga Blvd 2880 0.55 1 1 Cl 342 50% 360 198 94 104 0 W Point Rd SH 358 Eatenstion CR 35 1528 0.29 1 1 Cl 43 100% 360 209 12 196 0 W Point Rd Eatenstion CR 35 Eatenstion CR 37 2264 0.43 1 1 Cl 43 100% 360 310 18 291 0 W Point Rd Eatenstion CR 3] Holly Rd Extension 1261 0.24 1 1 Cl 43 100% 360 173 10 163 0 p 12,080 3,212 7,034 0 HS HS ic 1.0 A3 o � DOWNTOWN(SERVICE AREA 9)EXISTING ROADWAYS V�rNy o� Peak %In Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Existing i Exist Lanes Designation Veh-Mi Capacity Excess Capacity w Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) Hour Service Supply Demand Deficiencies Q W (Aerial) Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' NB SB EB WB Volume Area Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi �' Gulden St Surfside Blvd Coast 633 0.12 1 1 Cl 23 100% 360 86 3 84 0 W`� _ Beach Ave US 181 Timon Blvd 604 0.111 1 Cl 112 100% 360 82 13 70 0 a _ Beach Ave Timon Blvd Surfside Blvd 151 0.03 1 1 Cl 112 100% 360 21 3 17 0 aZ Beach Ave Surfside Blvd 300'SE of Gulfbreeze Ave 644 0.12 1 1 Cl 23 100% 360 88 3 85 0 a W Gulfspray Ave E Causeway Blvd Seagull Blvd 326 0.06 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 44 7 38 0 Gulfspray Ave Seagull Blvd Timon Blvd 281 0.05 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 38 6 32 0 8 Gulfspray Ave Timon Blvd Surfside Blvd 109 0.02 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 15 2 13 0 Gulfspray Ave Surfside Blvd 383'SE of Gulfbreeze Ave 716 0.14 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 98 15 82 0 Burleson St 152'NW of W Causeway Blvd W Causeway Blvd 152 0.03 1 1 Cl 88 100% 360 21 3 18 0 Burleson St W Causeway Blvd US 181 262 0.05 2 2 Cl 88 100% 360 71 4 67 0 Burleson St US 181 E Causeway Blvd/Seagull Blvd 148 0.03 2 2 Cl 244 100% 360 40 7 34 0 Burleson St E Causeway Blvd/Seagull Blvd Timon Blvd 512 0.10 1 1 Cl 244 100% 360 70 24 46 0 Burleson St Timon Blvd Surfside Blvd 111 0.02 1 1 Cl 244 100% 360 15 5 10 0 Burleson St Surfside Blvd 538'SE of Surfside Blvd 538 0.10 1 1 Cl 244 100% 360 73 25 48 0 E Walnut St W Causeway Blvd E Causeway Blvd(N) 82 0.02 1 1 Cl 27 100% 360 11 0 11 0 Paul PI Seagull Blvd Surfside Blvd 130 0.02 1 1 Cl 27 100% 360 18 1 17 0 Golf PI Timon Blvd E Surfside Blvd 52 0.01 1 1 Cl 68 100% 360 7 1 6 0 } Golf PI E Surfside Blvd 318'SE of E Surfside Blvd 499 0.09 1 1 Cl 68 100% 360 68 6 62 0 Lyf Elm St Plum St Seagull Blvd 321 0.06 1 1 Cl 68 100% 360 44 4 40 0 O Elm St Seagull Blvd W Surfside Blvd 321 0.06 1 1 Cl 68 100% 360 44 4 40 0 Q (� Z Coastal Ave Plum St Seagull Blvd 311 0.06 1 1 Cl 225 100% 360 42 13 29 0 W W Coastal Ave 05181 ESurfside Blvd 134 0.03 1 1 Cl 225 100% 360 18 6 13 0 Coastal Ave ES. ideBlvd N Shoreline Blvd 321 0.06 2 0 Cl 225 100% 360 44 14 30 0 Bridgeport Ave Plum St Seagull Blvd 320 0.06 1 1 Cl 180 100% 360 44 11 33 0 N�N } Bridgeport Ave Seagull Blvd W Surfside Blvd 358 0.07 1 1 Cl 180 100% 360 49 12 37 0 Ll. Q Bridgeport Ave W Surfside Blvd US 181 108 0.02 1 1 Cl 180 100% 360 15 4 11 0 W 0 Bridgeport Ave 05181 ESurfside Blvd 257 0.05 1 1 Cl 180 100% 360 35 9 26 0 O a Bridgeport Ave E Surfside Blvd N Shoreline Blvd 342 0.06 1 1 Cl 180 50% 360 1 23 6 17 0 UBreakwater Ave 321'NE of Seagull Blvd Seagull Blvd 321 0.06 1 1 Cl 104 50% 360 22 3 19 0 z 0 w Breakwater Ave Seagull Blvd W Surfside Blvd 360 0.07 1 1 Cl 104 50% 360 25 4 21 0 Breakwater Ave W Surfside Blvd US 181 122 0.02 1 1 Cl 104 50% 360 8 1 7 0 } Z Breakwater Ave U5 18 1 ESurfside Blvd 241 0.05 1 1 Cl 80 100% 360 33 4 29 0 O F F Breakwater Ave E Surfside Blvd N Shoreline Blvd 363 0.07 1 1 Cl 80 100% 360 50 6 44 0 z U (n P_H St E Surfside Blvd N Shoreline Blvd 389 0.07 0 2 Cl 135 100% 360 53 10 43 0 X N Port Ave Antelope St IH 37 217 0.04 2 2 Al 483 100% 540 89 20 69 0 W NPort Ave IH 37 WBroadway St 3154 0.60 2 2 Al 264 100% 540 1,290 158 1,133 0 O EPort Ave WBroadway St Union Pa cifi c/W Broadway St 710 0.13 2 2 C3 236 100% 315 169 32 138 0 E Port Ave Union Pacific/W Broadway St N 1-h-St 3069 0.58 22 Al 147 100% 540 1,256 85 1,170 0 E Port Ave N Tancahua St US 181 615 0.12 2 2 C3 147 100% 315 147 17 130 0 E Port Ave US 181 N Mesquite St 182 0.03 2 2 C3 123 100% 315 43 4 39 0 Hirsch St N Mesquite St N Chaparral St 263 0.05 2 2 C3 123 100% 315 63 6 57 0 Hirsch St N Chaparral St Hirsch St 323 0.06 1 1 Cl 123 100% 360 44 7 37 0 Fitzgerald St N Broadway St N Mesquite St 367 0.07 1 1 Cl10 100% 360 50 1 49 0 Fitzgerald St N Mesquite St N Chaparral St 354 0.07 1 1 Cl 10 100% 360 48 1 48 0 Fitzgerald St N Chaparral St N Shoreline Blvd 762 0.14 1 1 Cl 10 100% 360 104 1 102 0 Belden St N Tancahua St US 181 254 0.05 1 1 Cl 315 100% 360 35 15 19 0 23 Belden St US 181 N Broadway St 101 0.02 1 1 Cl 315 100% 360 14 6 8 0 HS HS Jc 1.0 A3 o � Belden St N Broadway St N Mesquite St 354 0.07 1 1 Cl 315 100% 360 48 21 27 0 y(/� Belden St N Mesquite St N Chaparral St 357 0.07 1 1 Cl 315 100% 360 49 21 27 0 Twigg St IH 37 NMesquite St 581 0.112 0 A2 370 100% 720 79 41 39 0 QW m Twigg St NMesquite St N Chaparral St 366 0.07 2 0 A2 370 100% 720 50 26 24 0 O W a Twigg St N Chaparral St N Water St 369 0.07 2 0 A2 370 100% 720 50 26 24 0 Twigg St N Water St N Shoreline Blvd 404 0.08 2 0 A2 370 100% 720 55 28 27 0 u= Buffalo St IH 37 N Tancahua St 654 0.12 2 1 Cl 35 100% 360 134 4 129 0 a Buffalo St N Tancahua St N Carancahua St 369 0.07 1 1 Cl 35 100% 360 50 2 48 0 Q Z Buffalo St N C--h-St N Upper Broadway St 350 0.07 1 1 Cl 35 100% 360 48 2 45 0 a W Taylor St N Upper Broadway St NMesquite St 585 0.11 1 1 Cl 105 100% 360 80 12 68 0 3� Taylor St N Mesquite St N Chaparml St 358 0.07 1 1 Cl 105 100% 360 49 7 42 0 �� 8 Taylor St N Chaparml St N Water St 374 0.07 1 1 C1 105 100% 360 51 7 44 0 Taylor St NWater St NShoreline Blvd 498 0.09 1 1 Cl 105 100% 360 68 10 58 0 Antelope St N Brownlee Blvd N Staples St 1795 0.34 2 0 Cl 31 100% 360 245 10 234 0 Antelope St N Staples St N Tancahua St 1445 0.27 1 1 Cl 164 100% 360 197 45 152 0 Antelope St N Tancahua St N Carancahua St 355 0.07 1 1 Cl 164 100% 360 48 11 37 0 Antelope St N Carancahua St N Upper Broadway St 351 0.07 1 1 Cl 164 100% 360 48 11 37 0 Peoples St N Upper Broadway St N Mesquite St 514 0.10 2 0 Cl 63 100% 360 70 6 64 0 Peoples St N Mesquite St N Chap rml St 368 0.07 2 0 Cl 63 100% 360 50 4 46 0 - Peoples St N Chaparml St N Water St 363 0.07 2 0 C1 63 1 100% 360 50 4 45 0 Peoples St NWater St NShoreline Blvd 510 0.10 2 0 Cl 63 100% 360 70 6 63 0 Peoples St NShoreline Blvd Peoples Street T-Head 782 0.15 2 0 Cl 63 100% 360 107 9 97 0 Q Leopard St 333'W of TX-286 TX 286 333 0.06 2 2 C3 640 100% 315 79 40 39 0 NWN Leopard St TX 286 N Staples St 1998 0.38 2 2 C3 176 100% 315 477 66 410 0 Ll. 0 Leopard St N Staples St N Tancahua St 1447 0.27 2 2 C3 313 100% 315 345 86 259 0 Q Z Leopard St N Tancahua St N Carancahua St 356 0.07 2 2 C3 221 100% 315 85 15 70 0 W = LU j Leopard St N C--h-St N Upper Broadway St 356 0.07 2 2 C3 221 100% 315 85 15 70 0 St ate Spur 407 N Upper Broadway St NMesquite St 522 0.10 0 2 Cl 96 100% 360 71 9 62 0 V (� Z State Spur 407 NMesquite St NChapuml St 380 0.07 0 2 Cl 96 100% 360 52 7 45 0 State Spur 407 N Chaparml St N Water St 373 0.07 0 2 C1 96 100% 360 51 7 44 0 Ll. Q SchatMl St N Water St N Shoreline Blvd 516 0.10 0 2 Cl 163 100% 360 70 16 54 0 W d Lawrence St N Upper Broadway St N Mesquite St 525 0.10 2 0 Cl 106 100% 360 72 11 61 0 O a Lawrence St N Mesquite St N Chaparml St 352 0.07 2 0 Cl 106 100% 360 48 7 41 0 V Lawrence St N Chaparml St N Water St 374 0.07 2 0 Cl 100 100% 360 51 7 44 0 z 0 w Lawrence St NWater St NShoreline Blvd 389 0.07 2 0 Cl 100 100% 360 53 7 46 0 Li an St TX-286 N Alameda St 1626 0.31 1 1 Cl 95 100% 360 222 29 192 0 0 Lipa.St N Alameda St N Staples St 371 0.07 1 1 Cl 95 100% 360 51 7 44 0 O F F Lipa.St N Staples St N Tancahua St 1428 0.27 2 2 C3 228 100% 315 341 62 279 0 z U (� Lipa.St N Tancahua St N.Carancahua St 361 0.07 1 1 Cl 228 100% 360 49 16 34 0 X Lipa.St N.Carancahua St N Upper Broadway St 359 0.07 1 1 Cl 163 100% 360 49 11 38 0 W Lomax St N Upper Broadway St N Mesquite St 349 0.07 0 2 Cl 13 100% 360M194226 47 0 O Lomax St N Mesquite St N Chaparml St 358 0.07 0 2 Cl 13 100% 36048 0 Lomax St N Chaparml St N Water St 374 0.07 0 2 C1 13 100% 36050 0 Lomax St N Water St N Shoreline Blvd 389 0.07 0 2 Cl 13 100% 36052 0 John Sartain St N Upper Broadway St N Mesquite St 278 0.05 2 0 Cl 108 100% 360 32 0 John Sartain St N Mesquite St N Chaparml St 360 0.07 2 0 Cl 108 100% 360 42 0 John Sartain St N Chaparml St N Water St 380 0.07 2 0 C1 108 100% 360 44 0 John Sartain St N Water St N Shoreline Blvd 394 0.07 2 0 Cl 108 100% 360 46 0 Comanche St TX-286 N Alameda St 1614 0.31 1 1 Cl 838 100% 3606 -36 36 Comanche St N Alameda St N Staples St 369 0.07 1 1 Cl 838 100% 360 -8 8 1-7 z Comanche St N Staples St N Tancahua St 1425 0.27 1 1 Cl 838 100% 3606 -32 32 Comanche St N Tancahua St N.C--h-St 352 0.07 1 1 Cl 838 100% 360 1 48 1 56 1 -8 8 T HS HS ic 1.0 A3 o � Laredo St TX-286 S Brownlee Blvd 495 0.09 0 2 A2 468 100% 720 135 44 91Mo N - Laredo St S Brownlee Blvd S Alameda St 1385 0.26 0 2 A2 468 100% 720 378 123 255 Laredo St S Alameda St S Staples St 467 0.09 0 2 A2 468 100% 720 64 41 22Q W Laredo St SStaples St NTancahua St 1268 0.24 0 2 A2 420 100% 720 173 101 72Q W a Laredo St N Tancahua St N Carancahua St 392 0.07 0 2 A2 420 100% 720 53 31 22 2 Laredo St N Carancahua St N Mesquite St 686 0.13 0 2 A2 287 100% 720 94 37 56a - Aggnes s St TX-286 S Brownlee Blvd 646 0.12 2 0 A2 525 100% 720 88 64 24a Z ASt S Brownlee Blvd S Alameda St 1381 0.26 2 0 A2 372 100% 720 188 97 91 W Agnes St S Alameda St S Staples St 444 0.08 2 0 A2 349 100% 720 61 29 31 3 z Agnes St SStaples St STancahua St 1231 0.23 2 0 A2 283 100% 720 168 66 102 0 8 Agnes St STancahua St SCamncahua St 385 0.07 2 0 A2 283 100% 720 53 21 32 0 Agnes St/TX 544 S Carancahua St S Chapparal St 713 0.14 2 0 A2 420 100% 720 97 57 41 0 Park Ave SStaples St STancahua St 1188 0.23 1 1 Cl 136 100% 360 162 31 131 0 Park Ave STancahua St SCamncahua St 365 0.07 1 1 Cl 136 100% 360 50 9 40 0 Park Ave S Carancahua St SChapparal St 366 0.07 1 1 C1 136 100% 360 50 9 40 0 Park Ave S Chapparal St SWater St 261 0.05 1 1 C1 136 100% 360 36 7 29 0 Park Ave SWater St S Shoreline Blvd(W) 299 0.06 1 1 Cl 136 100% 360 41 8 33 0 Park Ave S Shoreline Blvd(W) S Shoreline Blvd(E) 403 0.08 1 1 Cl 136 100% 360 55 10 45 0 Buford St S Staples St Santa Fe St 983 0.19 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 134 14 120 0 Buford St Santa Fe St 3rd St 352 0.07 1 1 Cl 77100% 360 48 5 43 0 Buford St 3rd St S Water St 608 0.12 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 83 9 74 0 - Buford St S Water St S Shoreline Blvd 363 0.07 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 50 5 44 0 W Surfside Blvd Gulden St Beach Ave 715 0.14 1 1 Cl 82 100% 360 98 11 86 0 �y O Surfside Blvd Beach Ave Gulf Spray Ave 1080 0.20 2 0 Cl 82 100% 360 147 17 131 0 LL F Surfside Blvd Gulf Spray Ave Burleson St 2148 0.412 0 Cl 82 100% 360 293 33 260 0 Q (1) Z Surfside Blvd Burleson St Paul PI 659 0.12 2 0 Cl 82 100% 360 90 10 80 0 W W w Surfside Blvd Paul PI Golf PI 448 0.08 2 0 Cl 82 100% 360 61 7 54 0 V U Z ESurfside Blvd Golf PI EIm St 353 0.07 2 0 Cl 82 100% 360 48 5 43 0 ESurfside Blvd Elm St Coastal Ave 458 0.09 2 0 Cl 82 100% 360 62 7 55 0 aI a E Surfside Blvd Coastal Ave Bridgeport Ave 357 0.07 0 2 Cl 82 100% 360 49 6 43 0 LU IL ESurfside Blvd Bridgeport Ave Breakwater Ave 354 1 0.07 0 2 Cl 82 100% 360 48 5 43 0 W 0 E Surfside Blvd Breakwater Ave 822'Sof Pearl St 1188 0.23 0 2 Cl 82 100% 360 162 18 144 0 0 a E Surfside Blvd 822'Sof Pearl St PeaH St 904 0.17 2 0 Cl 82 100% 360 123 14 109 0 z U 0 Tmon Blvd Beach Ave Gulf Spray Ave 1096 0.21 0 2 Cl 77 100% 360 149 16 134 0 , w Tmon Blvd Gulf Spray Ave Burleson St. 2156 0.41 0 2 Cl 77 100% 360 294 31 263 0 0 (!)Tmon Blvd Burleson St. Paul PI 2812 0.53 0 2 Cl 77 100% 360 383 41 343 0 O } Z N Shoreline Blvd Coastal Ave Bridgeport Ave 361 0.07 2 0 Cl 77 100% 360 49 5 44 0 ~ NShoreline Blvd Brid geport Ave Breakwater Ave 360 0.07 2 0 Cl 77 100% 360 49 5 1 44 0 z U N Shoreline Blvd Breakwater Ave PeaH St 343 0.06 2 0 Cl 77 100% 360 47 5 420 3 X Seagull Blvd Gulf Spray Ave Burleson St 2152 0.41 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 293 31 262 0 O W Seagull Blvd EWalnut St Elm St 363 0.07 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 50 5 44 0 Q Seagull Blvd Elm St Coastal Ave 356 0.07 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 49 5 43 0 Seagull Blvd Coastal Ave Brid gepmt Ave 360 0.07 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 49 5 44 0 Seagull Blvd Bridgeport Ave Breakwater Ave 362 0.07 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 49 5 44 0 N Shoreline Blvd 811'N of Resaca St Fitzgerald St 1180 0 22. 2 2 A2 155 100% 720 644 35 609 0 N Shoreline Blvd Fitzgerald St IH 37 Access 1365 0.26 2 2 A2 104 100% 720 745 27 718 0 N Shoreline Blvd IH 37 Access Twigg St 898 0.17 3 3 A3 356 100% 720 735 60 674 0 N Shoreline Blvd Twigg St Taylor St 360 0.07 3 3 A3 1,202 100% 720 295 82 213 0 N Shoreline Blvd Taylor St Peoples St 726 0.14 3 3 A3 1,334 100% 720 594 183 411 0 N Shoreline Blvd Peoples St Schatzell St(N) 366 0.07 3 3 A3 1,334 100% 720 299 92 207 012- N Shoreline Blvd Schatzell St(N) Schatzell St(S) 139 0.03 3 3 A3 1,334 100% 720 114 35 79 0 N Shoreline Blvd Schatzell St(S) Lawrence St 403 0.08 3 1 3 1 1 A3 1,695 100% 720 330 129 200 0 HS ic 1.0 A3 o � N Shoreline Blvd Lawrence St Lomax St 332 0.06 3 3 A3 1,523 100% 720272 96 176 0 N Shoreline Blvd Lomax St Coopers Aly 791 0.15 2 2 A3 1,523 100% 720 431 228 203 0 SSh-line Blvd Coopers Aly Kinney Ave 489 0.09 2 2 A2 1,437 100% 720 267 133 134 0 Q W m SSh-line Blvd Kinney Ave Park Ave 1268 0.24 2 2 A2 1,437 100% 720 692 345 346 0 O W E S Shoreline Blvd Park Ave Buford St 1773 0.34 2 2 A2 1,385 100% 720 967 465 502 0 S Shoreline Blvd Buford St Morgan Ave 1020 0.19 2 2 A2 1,744 100% 720 556 337 220 0 W= N Chaparral St Harbor Dr Hirsch St 420 0.08 2 2 C3 221 100% 315 100 18 83 0 a N Chaparral St Hirsch St Fitzgerald St 1445 0.27 2 1 Cl 221 100% 360 296 61 235 0 Q Z N Chaparral St Fitzgerald St Belden St 1080 0.20 2 2 C3 221 100% 315 258 45 212 0 a W N Chaparral St Belden St IH 37 Access 273 0.05 2 2 C3 221 100% 315 65 11 54 0 3 3 NChaparral St IH 37 Access Twigg St 700 0.13 11 Cl 180 100% 360 95 24 72 0 8� N Chaparral St Twigg St Taylor St 360 0.07 1 1 Cl 180 100% 360 49 12 37 0 N Chaparral St Taylor St Peoples St 729 0.14 1 1 Cl 245 100% 360 99 34 66 0 N Chaparral St Peoples St Schatzell St 258 0.05 1 1 C1 245 100% 360 35 12 23 0 N Chaparral St Schatzell St Lawrence St 363 0.07 1 1 C1 245 100% 360 50 17 33 0 N Chaparral St Lawrence St Lomax St 361 0.07 1 1 C1 255 100% 360 49 17 32 0 N Chaparral St Lomax St John Sartain St 357 0.07 1 1 Cl 255 100% 360 49 17 31 0 N Chaparral St John Sartain St Coopers Aly 515 0.10 1 11 Cl 220 100% 360 70 21 49 0 S Chaparral St Coopers Aly Kinney Ave 401 0.08 1 1 Cl 220 100% 360 55 17 38 0 - SChapuml St I Kinney Ave Park Ave 1574 0.30 1 1 C2 220 100% 300 179 66 113 0 NWater St IH 37 Access Twigg St 802 0.15 2 2 C3 450 100% 315 191 68 123 0 NWater St Twigg St Taylor St 371 0.07 2 2 C3 400 100% 315 89 28 60 0 Q N Water St Taylor St Peoples St 722 0.14 2 2 C3 435 100% 315 172 59 113 0 LU N Water St Peoples St Schatzell St 371 0.07 2 2 C3 329 100% 315 89 23 65 0 Ll. O N Water St Schatzell St Lawrence St 361 0.07 2 2 C3 392 100% 315 86 27 59 0 Q p Z NWater St Lawrence St Lomax St 366 0.07 2 2 C3 275 100% 315 87 19 68 0 W = LU j max N Water St LoSt John Sa67 rtain St 3 0 07. 2 2 C3 280 100% 315 88 19 68 0 N Water St John Sartain St Coopers Aly 491 0.09 2 2 C3 196 100% 315 117 18 99 0 V (� Z S Water St Coopers Aly Kinney Ave 425 0.08 2 2 C3 196 100% 315 101 16 86 0 N�N U) } S Water St Kinney Ave Park Ave 1415 0.27 2 2 C3 113 100% 315 338 30 307 mo Ll. D Q S Water St Park Ave Buford St 1809 0.34 1 1 C3 113 100% 315 216 39 177 W d Harbor Dr N Chaparral St E Port Ave 473 0.09 1 1 Cl 135 100% 360 65 12 52 T O a NMesquite St EPort Ave Fitzgerald St 1464 0.28 1 1 Cl 67 100% 360 200 19 181 V N Mesquite St Fitzgerald St Belden St 1085 0.21 1 1 Cl 67 100% 360 148 14 134 z 0 w N Mesquite St Belden St IH 37 Access 429 0.08 0 2 Cl 67 100% 360 59 5 53 N Mesquite St IH 37 Access Twigg St 514 0.10 0 2 Cl 154 100% 360 70 15 55 } z NMesquite St Twigg St Taylor St 373 0.07 0 2 Cl 154 100% 360 51 11 40 O F F N Mesquite St Taylor St Peoples St 723 0.14 0 2 Cl 169 100% 360 99 23 75 z U (� NMesquite St Peopl es St Schatzell St 159 0.03 0 2 Cl 169 100% 360 22 5 17 X NMesquite St Schatzell St Lawrence St 366 0.07 0 2 Cl 169 100% 360 50 12 38 0 W N Mesquite St Lawrence St Lomax St 362 0.07 0 2 Cl 154 100% 360 49 11 39 0 O NMesquite St Lomax St John Sartain St 363 0.07 0 2 Cl 154 100% 360 50 11 39 0 N Mesquite St John Sartain St Coopers Aly 546 0.10 0 2 Cl 154 100% 360 74 16 59 0 N Mesquite St Coopers Aly S Upper Broadway St 536 0.10 0 2 Cl 154 100% 360 73 16 58 0 N Tancahua St E Port Ave 96'N of Hughes St 306 0.06 2 1 Cl 161 100% 360 63 9 53 0 N Tancahua St 96'N of Hughes St Fitzgerald St(Ext) 804 0.15 2 1 Cl 159 100% 360 164 24 140 0 N Tancahua St Fitzgerald St(EM) Belden St 1039 0.20 1 1 Cl 170 100% 360 142 34 108 0 N Tancahua St Belden St Padre St 456 0.09 1 1 Cl 170 100% 360 62 15 47 0 N Tancahua St Padre St IH 37 362 0.07 0 2 Cl 136 100% 360 49 9 40 0 N Tancahua St IH 37 Buffalo St 391 0.07 0 2 Cl 136 100% 360 53 10 43 0 12- NTancahua St Buffalo St Antelope St 370 0.07 0 2 Cl 136 100% 360 50 10 41 0 N Tancahua St Antelope St Leopard St 370 0.07 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 Cl 1 220 1 100% 360 1 50 1 15 35 0 HS HS ic 1.0 A3 O � f/1 3 -- N Tancahua St Leopard St Lipan St 778 0.15 0 2 Cl 477 100% 360 106 70 36 0 W m N Tancahua St Lipan St Comanche St 364 0.07 0 2 Cl 255 100% 360 50 18 32 0 O W N Tancahua St Comanche St Coopers Aly 536 0.10 0 2 Cl 344 100% 360 73 35 38 0 STancahua St Coopers Aly Laredo St 760 0.14 0 2 Cl 344 100% 360 104 50 54 0 aZ STancahua St Laredo St Agnes St 72 0.01 0 3 C2 344 100% 300 12 5 8 0 STancahua St Agnes St Park Ave 836 0.16 0 3 C2 315 100% 300 143 50 93 0 Q Z STancahua St/Santa Fe Park Ave Buford St 1752 0.33 0 3 C2 156 100% 300 299 52 247 0 a W Santa Fe St Buford St Morgan Ave 1034 0.20 0 2 Cl 357 100% 360 141 70 71 0 3 N Camncahua St Padre St IH 37 315 0.06 2 0 Cl 73 100% 360 43 4 39 0 8 N Camncahua St IH37 Buffalo St 556 0.11 2 0 Cl 73 100% 360 76 8 68 0 N Camncahua St Buffalo St Antelope St 365 0.07 2 0 Cl 280 100% 360 50 19 30 0 N Camncahua St Antelope St Leopard St 370 0.07 2 0 Cl 280 100% 360 50 20 31 0 N Camncahua St Leopard St Lipan St 770 0.15 2 0 Cl 335 100% 360 105 49 56 0 N C--h-St Lipan St Comanche St 365 0.07 2 0 Cl 291 100% 360 50 20 30 0 N Camncahua St Comanche St Coopers Aly 517 0.10 2 0 Cl 272 100% 360 71 27 44 0 N Camncahua St Coopers Aly Laredo St 589 0.11 2 0 Cl 322 100% 360 80 36 44 0 N Camncahua St Laredo St Agnes St 493 0.09 2 0 Cl 352 100% 360 67 33 34 0 SCamncahua St Agnes St Park Ave 844 0.16 2 0 C1 352 100% 360 115 56 59 0 co S Camncahua St/3rd St Park Ave Buford St 1780 0.34 2 0 Cl 274 100% 360 243 92 150 0 _ 3rd St Buford St Morgan Ave 1038 0.20 2 0 Cl 257 100% 360 142 50 91 0 N Staples St WBmadway St IH 37 2148 0.41 1 1 Cl 77 100% 360 293 31 262 0 LU N Staples St IH 37 Antelope St 200 0.04 2 2 C3 340 100% 315 48 13 35 0 Ll. 0 N Staples St Antelope St Leopard St 362 0.07 2 2 C3 340 100% 315 86 23 63 0 Q D Z N Staples St Leopard St Lipan St 770 0.15 2 2 C3 462 100% 315 184 67 116 0 LU W LU N Staples St Lipan St Comanche St 360 0.07 2 2 C3 462 100% 315 86 32 54 0 V = N Staples St/S Staples Sl Comanche St Laredo St 1607 0.30 2 2 C3 607 100% 315 383 185 199 0 V Z S Staples St Laredo St Agnes St 328 0.06 2 2 C3626 100% 315 78 39 39 0 j }Q SStaples St Agnes St Park Ave 782 0.15 2 2 C3 712 100% 315 187 106 81 0 W D S Staples St Park Ave Buford St 1589 0.30 2 2 C3 753 100% 315 379 227 153 0 0 S Staples St Buford St Morgan Ave 1008 1 0.19 1 2 2 C3 796 100% 315 241 152 89 0 N Alameda St Lipan St Comanche St 365 0.07 1 1 Cl 38 100% 360 50 3 47 0 U a NAlameda St Comanche St Kinney St 1325 0.25 1 1 Cl 38 100% 360 181 10 171 0 z O ame SAlda St Kinney St Laredo St 357 0.07 1 1 Cl 38 100% 360 49 3 46 0 S 0 SAlameda St Laredo St Agnes St 330 0.06 1 1 Cl 38 100% 360 45 2 43 0 Q Z SAlameda St Agnes St Morgan Ave 3350 0.63 1 1 Cl38 100% 360 457 24 433 0 ~ F Crosstown Access 2 Caldwell St 442'N of Laredo St 806 0.15 1 1 Cl 86 100% 360 110 13 97 0 z V Ln Crosstown Access Rd 442'N of Laredo St Laredo St 442 0.08 2 2 Cl 258 100% 360 121 22 99 0 W S Brownlee Blvd Laredo St Agnes St 340 0.06 2 2 C3 258 100% 315 81 17 64 0 O SBrownlee Blvd Agnes St Morgan Ave 3210 0.61 2 2 C3 258 100% 315 766 157 609 0 Q W Bmadway St NPort Ave NStaples St 2801 0.53 1 1 Cl 14 100% 360 382 7 375 0 W Bmadway St NStaples St Padre St 1569 0.30 1 1 Cl 15 100% 360 214 4 209 0 Morgan Ave TX 286 SBrownlee Blvd 1367 0.26 2 2 Al 1,434 50% 540 280 186 94 0 Morgan Ave S Brownlee Blvd S Almeda St 1376 0.26 2 2 Al 1,005 50% 540 281 131 151 0 Morgan Ave SAlmeda St SStaples St 350 0.07 2 2 Al 854 50% 540 72 28 43 0 Morgan Ave S Staples St Santa Fe St 1248 0.24 2 2 Al 591 50% 540 255 70 185 0 Morgan Ave Santa Fe St 3rd St 346 0.07 2 2 Al 310 50% 540 71 10 61 0 Gulden St Surfside Blvd Coast 727 0.14 2 2 Al 310 100% 540 297 43 255 0 gs 33,818 1 8,692 1 25,126 84 11,121 HS HS ic 1.0 `a3 BAYSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 9)EXISITNG ROADWAY INVENTORY Q Exist Lanes Roadway From To Length Designatio Peak Hour%IRService Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Toal Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies ,w _+ (mi) NB SB EB WB n(Aerial) Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi Pk-Hr Veh-Mi `N – cnrtlleRtl Ayd11 St TTmryR tl Artlle Rd roliRtl roll L, QW ArtlleRtl bOW m Mve ArtlleRd weber Rd rhartRtl ollfhar Rd E.py W? LollharRtl =Rtl a c� oll har Rd ,or,Rd ar°ol'I Ln 1 Z olllharRtl rrolltn WeberRtl W ollihand weber Rd Staples St Rd py Rd 8 Hor,d Rd t yRtl R—dly S1 e Rd g Pkwy Pkw Rd Tar1lo,S1 xpy Naples St MEL aple,Stn slaplS Rd— t es St BartlwnBlvd Expy Baldwin Blvd tas ISes St Morgan Ave wn Expy rownlee Blvd Morgan Ave lee Blvd SAlametla St Mora,Id metla St a Morgan Ave SStaples St Morgan Ave SStapl2sSL W O Morgan Ave St etnFBrSt (/� Z Elizabeth St roawnlee Blvd SOAlametla St j izabeth St SAlametla St Staples St izabeth St Staples St Salla W V Z izabeth St Btl St fe U Ell-beth St 3adtstFeSt nDr a own eBlvtl amedaSt ssa;leaSt sslaplesSt W 0 D a Aydr,S1 I'd S1 0e n Stor V O 1et„a5Lo--a Id1es5 SAlametla St r LL S Al metla St Ala—da W O S, o F_d S1 72B 64B 71 569 1 Z m�2�!22 Salla F Idatst B Ave V/,^ Staples St ou l ]9 k sth of Indiana V er ou I9 k sth of In tliana Ave Stapl es StX eRtlrPkw w Rraw,drPkwy W erSPkwy z Rd Rraw,dr Pkwy K—orgRtl CLro1 n er Pkw Carroll In to les St Rraw,dr Pkw, to les St SAlametla St er Pkwyo eka St Car-1 Pkwyto les St SAlametlatSt Car-1 Pkwy SAlametla St Robert Dr SAlametla St Robert Dr Robert Dr Salla 01da,Dr MorganeAve iabeth StI A2 2111 1— 72B gTIT,Dr izabeth St HIS HIS ic 1.0 A3 ondndge s, D, ooddade= RdddII D, Al--dQy s, Morgan Ave Elizabeth st — medas, Elizabeth st — S Al medas, saple,s, QLU m meds s, 3BB 3BB 385 85 85 Al--s, r;l O W Al--st ay Trl Av caner Pk,y 8.67 2 2 B B Al 1937 188% 548 1438 1289 149 B 2 Al--s, y llrPkw oddridg e W S, ametla lst lloddridge stmel Pkwy 8.84 2 2 B B Al 154 188% 548 1818 129 1688 B — lamedas, mel Pkw verhart Rd 8.13 2 2 e e Al 2— 188% 548 288 2]5 5 e Z amedas, erhartRd" anber,er B.LS 2 e e AL 1859 58% 540 8 6 22 e a W Morgan Ave izabeth st izabeth s, 3 8 ,Pkwy658 2B3 B TrlPkw lloaddrid e lldddridge s, Robert llr 5t E e Rd Rdn metla st Al--S, wnlee Blvd Blvd Baldwin Blvd _ Ayd,SI Baldwin Blvd Tarlton st 67 43 24 B nRtl AydII SI rnRtl o°rt Ae ParR -IR,Rd Ayd,SI lha tl ,ArdleRd a LU p o A,dle Rd SH 358 ,nr`z Rd ,a le,s, rtnn s, 8.58 2 2 e e C3 L265 LBB% 3L5 638 632 3 3 5p z yzRtl s, owner Pkwy a w Rd erPkwy me Rd LV x z zRd ane Rtl �IR,Rd U U _ HRtl GO IR,Rd M,ArgleRd dd M,ArdleRd 35 ss,aple,er P, owner Pkwy d Q kwy -IR,Rd Lu O 0 rrol Ln -IR,Rd McArdle Rd ,^ a Uo °agearcArdle Rd V es, eaasALL loda re s, m Dddddges SNamedas, ss,aple,s, W O z weber Ra _p ,a less, -IR,Ra Q F Z Weber Rd -lmar Ra ,Arnie Ra F Weber Ra M,A,dldRd (n U vi verhart Rd mer D, SAlam—st } x verhart Rd SAlameaa ,a less, a W erh-Rd s,aple,s, ArdleRd erh-Rd ,ArdleRd m staple,s, Morgan Ave Hzabe,h st staple,st izabeth st R2�1 S" Staples st n Blvd staple,st Blvd ealdw nBlvd staple,s, Raltlwin Blvd rapids st Staples s, z Rd staples st zRd Trl B*+� _% �2�214 54B 25 25 „.z staple,st wnne'r Pkwy z staples st Tr Pkwy Weber Rtl r IRS IRS jc 1.0 `a3 staples st weber Rd mel Pkwy Q,w staples st el Pkwy Gollihar Rd,716 ft n a'th of Everhart _i olli Mar Rd,]16 ft north I Everhart Rd verhart Rd — 3rtl st es Morgan Ave Elizabeth st sora morgan nye eaabem st Q W m Rl�d Elizabeth st Rl�tl O W Rl�d s;a;lsesest W? — 74696 INQ 22253 2690 a c� aa z -- - W rn a LU p o a Z � W LV U Z U a W a D (� UQ O O L F Z U y a W m IRS IRS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ BAYSIDE2 SERVICEAREA 10 EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY `1i _ oad—y m Length(.I) Uill L-1 esignation(Aerial) eak Hour ---city Veh MiSupply Pk Veh MiTotal cess CapaMry ting Deficiencies 3z EB B Volume Pk Hr Per Lane oral —d!Pk Hr EPk Hr V h xPk Hr Veh MiA cArdle Rd —h-Rd 125 ft east of Holmes Dr 8 cArdle Rd 125 R east of Holmes Dr s Staples St cArdle Rd s Staples St Airline Rd cArdle Rd Airline Rd Nile Dr cArdle Rd Nile Dr Rodd Field Rd McArdle Rd Rodd Field Rd loslin Rd P.49 P P C2 479 3PP 292 234 59 P ollihar Rd s Staples St tang Trl ollihar Rdtang TH ArlSne Rd Pharaoh Dr Niles D, 51loslin Rd Robert Dr Aitrline Rd Robert Dr Airline Rd eRd loslin Rd 0 0—Dr dnn n Rd 32 ft east of Sand Dollar BlvdA2 591 72P 2,548 121 2,025 P Staple,St ve�rh-Rd -hhar Rd,—ft south of Everhart Rd } Staples St ollih,Rd,eDe ft south of Everhart Rd tang Trl Q Staples St -,tang Trl McArdle Rd W O Staples St McArdle Rd 58 Stang Trl -hhar Ra Staples St a (/� Z ne Rd nes St j eRd -'d,S, SAlameda St W eRd SDAlameda St -hhar Ral'INU U Z eRd -hhar Rd cArdle Rd _ ne Rd McArdle Rd e Pharaoh Dr M,ASd Ie Rd �leecArdle Rd a oReldRd cArdle Rd SAW a In Rd AcDr lm—St O ln Rd SS l--St = Q�DQ Pharaoh Dr U O n Pharaoh rn Rd Dr McArdle Rd (V LL w h,Rd McArdle Rd e O EE-1-1 Rd e M,Asme Ra W Q F Z ve Everhart Rd M,A,dld Ra Staple,St Everhart Ra Staple,St SAla —S, ,/� U y Robert Dr SAlameda St n Robert dr } X Robert Dr0,— a W meda5t -h-Rd be°torr m meda5t RnbertDr ArhneRd 1.76 2 meda5t ArineRd to,InRd L69 540 1,619 T476 33,732 22,723 n'.V 1,924 HIS HIS ic 1.0 A3 - Z � SOUTHSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 11)EXISITNG ROADWAY INVENTORY Q Peak Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Veh-MiExcess Existing (� o Exist Lanes Designation Hour %In Capacity Supply Demand Capacity Deficienci 3 ^} Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) based on Volume Service es W m Pk-Hr Per Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh LU Aerial Area Pk-Hr Veh N TBSB TEBWBa NB SB EB WB Lane Total' Total' Mi' Mi Ayers St SH 358 Civitan Dr 1995 0.38 2 2 C3 703 100% 315 476 266 210 a(' Ayers St Civitan Dr Holly Rd 1942 0.37 2 2 C3 703 100% 315 463 259 205 Q Z a Ayers St Holly Rd Allencrest Dr 3331 0.63 2 2 Al 909 100% 540 1,363 573 789 aW Ayers St Allencrest Dr Saratoga Blvd 1980 0.38 2 2 Al 422 100% 540 810 158 652 �� a Ayers St Saratoga Blvd SH 286 3886 0.74 1 1 Cl 98 100% 360 530 72 458 Civitan Dr Ayers St Holly Rd 3595 0.68 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 490 77 414 Richter St SH 385 Sokol Dr 1962 0.37 1 1 C1 212 100% 360 268 79 189 Richter St Sokol Dr Holly Rd 1160 0.22 1 1 Cl 212 100% 360 158 47 112 White Bird Dr Kostoryz Rd Masterson Dr 3145 0.60 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 429 Kostoryz Rd SH 358 Sokol Dr/Tiger Ln 1977 0.37 2 2 Al 2592 100% 540 809 970 -162 162 Kostoryz Rd Sokol Dr/Tiger Ln Holly Rd 1919 0.36 2 2 Al 1582 100% 540 785 575 210 Kostoryz Rd Holly Rd White Bird Dr 1996 0.38 2 2 Al 2134 100% 540 817 807 10 Kostoryz Rd White Bird Dr Masterson Dr 1390 0.26 2 2 Al 2134 100% 540 569 562 7 r Kostoryz Rd Masterson Dr Saratoga Blvd 1960 0.37 2 2 Al 1049 100% 540 802 389 412 Q } Tiger Ln Kostoryz Rd Carroll Ln 2802 0.53 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 382 - - LU Tiger Ln Carroll Ln Weber Rd 2645 0.50 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 361 - - F 0 Carroll Ln SH 358 Tiger Ln 1265 0.24 1 1 Cl 701 100% 360 173 168 5 Q y Z Carroll Ln Tiger Ln Holly Rd 2625 0.50 1 1 Cl 654 100% 360 358 325 33 LU Carroll Ln E Holly Rd 246'South of Cresthill Dr 1830 0.35 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 250 - - U V Z Carroll Ln W Holly Rd 194'Cresthill Dr 2009 0.38 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 274 - - 7 }- Evans Rd Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr 1547 0.29 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 211 - - Evans Rd Acush net Dr Bratton Rd 1285 0.24 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360175 - - LL.) Weber Rd SH 358 Tiger Ln 1310 0.25 3 2 Al 2414 50% 540 335 299 35 0Q Weber Rd Tiger Ln Capri Dr 1584 0.30 2 2 Al 2467 50% 540 324 370 -46 46 r U0 LL Weber Rd Capri Dr Holly Rd 1015 0.19 2 2 Al 2467 50% 540 208 237 -30 30 LU 0 0 Weber Rd Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 1111 0.21 2 2 Al 2501 50% 540 227 263 -36 36 0 } Z Weber Rd Schanen Blvd Wickersham St 2347 0.44 2 2 Al 2501 50% 540 480 556 -76 76 Fn U y Weber Rd Wickersham St Capitol Dr 842 0.16 2 2 Al 2501 50% 540 172 199 -27 27 = X Weber Rd Capitol Dr Saratoga Blvd 1032 0.20 2 2 Al 2106 50% 540 211 206 5 W Weber Rd Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr 804 0.15 2 2 Al 2136 50% 540 164 163 2 O Weber Rd Acush net Dr Bratton Rd 1840 0.35 2 2 Al 2136 50% 540 376 372 4 0 Weber Rd Bratton Rd Aaron Dr 1313 0.25 2 2 Al 1410 50% 540 269 175 93 Weber Rd jAaron Dr Yorktown Blvd 1451 0.27 2 2 Al 1410 50% 540 297 194 103 Weber Rd Yorktown Blvd Oso Creek 1990 0.38 2 2 Al 1626 50% 540 407 306 101 Sokol Dr Richter St Kostoryz Rd 2646 0.50 1 1 Cl 421 100% 360 361 211 150 Holly Rd SH 286 Ayers St 1091 0.21 2 2 Al 1540 100% 540 446 318 128 Holly Rd Ayers St Civitan Dr 1987 0.38 2 2 Al 1540 100% 540 813 579 233 Holly Rd Civitan Dr Richter St 661 0.13 2 2 Al 1540 100% 540 270 193 78 z Holly Rd Richter St Kostoryz Rd 2621 0.50 2 2 Al 1590 100% 540 1,072 789 283 Holly Rd Kostoryz Rd Carroll Ln 2649 0.50 2 2 Al 1590 100% 540__H,084 798 286HS Holly Rd Carroll Ln Weber Rd 2641 0.50 2 2 Al 1864 100% 540 932 148HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW Masterson Dr White Bird Dr Kostoryz Rd 938 0.18 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 128 - - Masterson Dr Kostoryz Rd Angelic-Ct 522 0.10 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 71 - - Allencrest Dr Ayers St Carmago Dr 3133 0.59 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 427 Norchester Dr Wickersham St Glenway St 932 0.18 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 127 -Wickersham St Norchester Dr Weber Rd 2714 0.51 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 370 - - - Saratoga Blvd SH 286 Ayers St 1005 0.19 3 3 A3 2237 100% 720 822 426 396 Saratoga Blvd Ayers St 1286'W of Ranger Ave 2262 0.43 3 3 A3 2288 100% 720 1,851 980 870 - Saratoga Blvd 1286'W of Ranger Ave Ranger Ave 1286 0.24 3 3 A3 2288 100% 720 1,052 557 495 W Saratoga Blvd IRangerAve Cabaniss Pkwy 1552 0.29 1 1 3 1 3 1 A3 2192 1 100% 1 720 1,270 1 644 626 1 1 0 Saratoga Blvd Cabaniss Pkwy Kostoryz Rd 253 0.05 3 3 A3 2192 100% 720 207 105 M Q Z Saratoga Blvd Kostoryz Rd Norchester Dr(PR Segment) 2658 0.50 3 3 A3 2706 100% 720 2,175 1,362 LU W Saratoga Blvd Norchester Dr(PR Segment) Evans Rd 678 0.13 3 3 A3 3044 100% 720 555 391 V 2 Z Saratoga Blvd Evans Rd Weber Rd 2000 0.38 3 3 A3 2767 100% 720 1,636 1,048 U Ranger Ave Saratoga Blvd Cabaniss Pkwy 1425 0.27 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 194 -Cabaniss Pkwy Cac[us DrSaratoga Blvd 2474 0.47 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 337 - W OL Brezina Rd Bratton Rd 1064'N of Weber Rd 2293 0.43 1 1 C1 NC 100% 360 313 - U)Bratton Rd Evans Rd Kram St 1003 0.19 1 1 C1 43 100% 360 137 8 0 Bratton Rd Kram St Weber Rd 1166 0.22 1 1 Cl 43 100% 360 159 9 LL Kram St Acush net Dr Bratton Rd 1845 0.35 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 252 0Acush net Dr Evans Rd Kram St 810 0.15 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 110Acush net Dr Kram St Weber Rd 1170 0.22 1 1 Cl NC 100% 360 160 - � U 3 = X ~ W U) HS HS jc 1.0 A3 - Z � C $m SOUTH SIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 12)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY ,w Design Ei Peak %In Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Existing 3 N Exist E.- Hour E. ss Capacity i m Roadway From To Le ngth(R( Length(mi( on based Service Capacity Supply Demand Deficiencies Volume Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' on Aeri al Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr To[a I' Pk-Hr To[al� Pk-Hr Veh-Mi O NB SB EB WR 2D2D e Weber Rd SH 359 Tiger Ln 1310 0.25 3 2 Al 2414 50% 540 335 299 35 0 e Weber Rd Tiger Ln Capri Dr 1594 0.30 2 2 Al 2467 50% 540 324 370 -46 46 W��Ixwww Weber Rd Capri Dr Holly Rd 1015 0.19 2 2 Al 2467 50% 540 209 237 -30 30 �� a s Weber Rd Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 1111 0.21 2 2 Al 2501 50% 540 227 263 -36 36 w Weber Rtl Schad en Blvd Wickersham St 2347 0.44 2 2 Al 2501 50% 540 490 556 -76 76 i W Weber Rtl Wickersham St Capitol Dr 942 0.16 2 2 Al 2106 50% 540 172 169 4 0 3 Weber Rd ICapit.l Dr Saratoga Blvd 10320.20 2 2 Al 2106 50% 540 211 206 5 0 �� 8 Weber Rd Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr 904 0.15 2 2 Al 2136 50% 540 164 163 2 0 Weber Rd Acushnet Dr Bratton Rd 1940 0.35 2 2 Al 2136 50% 540 376 372 4 0 Weber Rd Bratton Rd Aaron Dr 1313 0.25 2 2 Al 1410 50% 540 269 175 93 0 Weber Rd Aaron Dr Yorktown Blvd 1451 0.27 2 2 Al 1410 50% 540 297 194 103 0 Tiger Ln Weber Rd Flynn Pkwy 2715 0.51 2 2 C3 700 100% 315 649 360 299 0 Capri Dr Weber Rd Tripoli Dr 1199 0.23 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 162 0 162 0 Tripoli Dr Capri Dr Philippine Dr 1126 0.21 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 154 0 154 0 Philippine Dr Tripoli Dr Flynn Pkwy 6195 1.17 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 943 0 943 0 Corona Dr Flynn Pkwy Everhart Rd 2673 0.51 1 1 C1 615 100% 360 365 311 53 0 Bonner Dr Flynn Pkwy Everhart Rd 2701 0.51 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 369 0 369 0 N Flynn Pkwy ISH 359 Tiger Ln/Corona Dr 1152 0.22 1 1 Cl 652 100% 360 157 142 15 0 Flynn Pkwy Tiger Ln Philippine Dr/Bonner Dr 1472 0.29 1 1 Pl 652 100% 360 201 192 19 0 a } Flynn Pkwy Philippine Dr/Bonner Dr Holly Rd 1359 0.26 1 1 Pi 652 100% 360 195 169 17 0 W S Flynn Pkwy Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 939 0.16 1 1 Pi 652 100% 360 114 103 11 0 0 S Flynn Pkwy Schanen Blvd N Shea Pkwy 350 0.07 1 1 Pi 100% 360 49 0 49 0 Q Ln F Holly Rd Weber Rd Flynn Pkwy 2991 0.57 2 2 Al 1997 100% 540 1,224 1,069 155 0 Z Holly Rd Flynn Pkwy Everhart Rd 2304 0.44 2 2 Al 1641 100% 540 943 716 227 0 W W W Holly Rd Everhart Rd Betty Jean Dr 2649 0.50 2 2 Al 1973 100% 540 1,094 940 144 0 V Z Holly Rd Betty Jean Dr S Staples St 2647 0.50 2 2 Al 1972 100% 540 1,093 939 144 0 j a 1o11y Rd SStaples St Patton St 2352 0.45 2 2 Al 1962 100% 540 962 974 99 0 LL Holly Rd Patton St Trey Way Ln 237 0.04 2 2 Al 1962 100% 540 97 99 9 0 W a 0 Ho11y Rd Trey Way Ln Airline Rd 2029 0.39 22 Al 1962 100% 540 930 754 76 0 ,^ Schanen Blvd Weber Rd E Flynn Pkwy 3065 0.59 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 419 0 419 0 v2 Q Q Schanen Blvd E Flynn Pkwy Everhart Rd 2405 0.46 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 329 0 329 0 V N Shea Pkwy E Flynn Pkwy Everhart Rd 2299 0.43 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 312 0 312 0 N LL SShea Pwky Everhart Rd O'Hara Dr 2470 0.47 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 337 0 337 0 W 0 0 EShea Pkwy SShea Pkwy Congressional Dr 2945 0.56 1 1 P1 0 100% 360 402 0 402 0 0 } Z EShea Pkwy Congressional Dr Saratoga Blvd 945 0.16 1 1 P1 0 100% 360 115 0 115 0 F F Shea Pkwy Kill-dt Dr Congressional Dr 1110 0.21 1 1 P1 0 100% 360 151 0 151 0 T, LnW Shea Pkwy Congressional Dr Saratoga Blvd 945 0.16 1 1 P1 0 200% 360 230 0 230 0 i Congressional Dr Weber Rd W Shea Pkwy 2690 0.51 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 367 0 367 0 ? W Congress ional Dr W Shea Pkwy EShea Pkwy 163 0.03 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 22 0 22 0 O Congressional Dr EShea Pkwy Everhart Rd 2976 0.54 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 392 0 392 0 ,^ Aaron Dr Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr 1094 0.21 1 1 C1 469 100% 360 149 96 51 0 V/ Aaron Dr Acushnet Dr Wapentate Dr 2950 0.54 1 1 C1 469 100% 360 399 253 135 0 Aaron Dr Wapentate Dr Sun Ve11ey Dr 1969 0.35 1 1 Cl 469 100% 360 255 166 99 0 Aaron Dr Sun Ve11ey Dr IWdbd,Rd 1059 0.20 1 1 Cl 469 100% 360 144 94 50 0 Sun Ve11ey Dr Aaron Dr Cedar Pass Dr 1342 0.25 1 1 C1 332 100% 360 193 94 99 0 Sun Ve11ey Dr Cedar Pass Dr Yorktown Blvd 1600 0.30 1 1 C1 332 100% 360 219 101 119 0 Sanders Dr Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr 1237 0.23 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 169 0 169 0 Sanders Dr Acushnet Dr Gra dd Ju dctiod Dr 1613 0.31 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 220 0 220 0 ee Acushnet Dr Weber 12- Rd Aaron Dr 1724 0.33 1 1 C1 249 100% 360 235 91 154 0 ez Acushnet Dr Aaron Dr Sanders Dr 2259 0.43 1 1 C1 249 100% 360 309 106 202 0 r Acushnet Dr IS8ddd,,Dr Middlecoff Dr 525 1 0.10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cl 1 249 1 100% 1 360 1 72 25 47HS 0 HS jc 1.0 `a3 Acushnet Dr Mitltllecoff Dr Saratoga Blvd 947 0.16 1 1 Cl 249 100% 360 116 40 76 0 ,Q Grand J u notion Dr Cedar Pass Dr Wapentate Dr 1927 0.36 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 263 0 263 0 _+ _ Grand Junction Dr Wapentate Dr Sanders Dr 1992 0.36 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 259 0 259 0 N - GrandJunction Dr Sanders Dr Everhart Rd 1327 0.25 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 191 0 191 0 LU Wapentate Dr Aaron Dr Grand Junction Dr 219 0.04 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 30 0 30 0 Q e Lu Middlecoff Dr Acushnet Dr Everhart Rd 994 0.19 1 1 C1 225 100% 360 136 42 93 0 O z Mitltllecoff Dr Everhart Rd Player St 1147 0.22 1 1 C1 225 100% 360 156 49 109 0 PlayerSt Mitltllecoff Dr Saratoga Blvd1 1 C1 1179 0.22 134 100% 360 161 30 131 0 `V e Yorktown Blvd Weber Rd Sun Valley Dr 1767 0.33 2 2 A2 1546 50% 720 492 259 223 0 Q x v Yorktown Blvd Sun Valley Dr Oso Pkwy 3909 0.74 2 2 A2 1546 50% 720 1,066 572 494 0 `1„ Yorktown Blvd Oso Pkwy Everhart Rtl 2390 0.45 2 2 A2 1355 50% 720 652 307 345 0 �I w Yorktown Blvd Everhart Rd Lipes Blvd 2190 0.41 2 2 A2 1591 50% 720 1 597 330 267 0 3" Yorktown Blvd Lipes Blvd SStaples St 3115 0.59 2 2 A2 1514 50% 720 950 447 403 0 8� Yorktown Blvd S Staples St Loire Blvd 2397 0.45 2 2 A2 1599 50% 720 654 361 293 0 Yorktown Blvd Loire Blvd Cimarron Blvd 2904 0.55 2 2 A2 2032 50% 720 792 559 233 0 Everhart Rd SH 359 Corona Dr/Williams Dr 1079 0.20 2 2 Al 3721 100% 540 441 760 -319 319 Everhart Rd Corona Dr/Williams Dr Bonner Dr 1512 0.29 2 2 Al 3597 100% 540 619 1,027 -409 409 Everhart Rd Bonner Dr Holly Rd 1290 0.24 2 2 Al 2199 100% 540 529 535 -7 7 Everhart Rd Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 449 0.09 2 2 Al 2179 100% 540 194 195 -1 1 Everhart Rd Schanen Blvd N Shea Pkwy 764 0.14 2 2 Al 2179 100% 540 313 315 -3 3 Everhart Rd N Shea Pkwy SShea Pkwy 190 0.04 2 2 Al 2179 100% 540 79 79 -1 1 Everhart Rd SShea Pkwy Woolridge Rd 545 0.10 2 2 Al 2179 100% 540 223 225 -2 2 Everhart Rd Woolritlge Rd Con re onal Dr 1515 0.29 2 2 C3 1996 100% 315 362 541 -190 190 N Everhart R Congressional Dr Saratogalelvd 1963 0.35 2 2 C3 1996 100% 315 445 666 -221 221 r p Everhart Rd Saratoga Blvd Mitltllecoff Rd 1191 0.22 2 2 Al 3154 100% 540 493 705 -222 222 Everhart Rd Mitltllecoff Rd Grand Jct Dr/Snowgoose Rd 1449 0.27 2 2 Al 1952 100% 540 593 536 57 0 W Everhart Rd Grand Jct Dr/Snowgoose Rd Cedar Pass Dr 2641 0.50 2 2 Al 153J 100% 540 1,090 769 312 0 N _ O Everhart Rd Cedar Pass Dr Yorktown Blvd 2629 0.50 2 2 C3 769 100% 315 627 392 245 0 I.�f� F F Williams Dr Everhart Rd Blanche Moore Dr 2692 0.51 2 2 C3 796 100% 315 640 404 236 0 Q Z Williams Dr Blanch Moore Dr SStaples St 2659 0.50 2 2 C3 796 100% 315 634 401 234 0 W W Williams Dr SStaples St Treyway Ln 2642 0.50 2 2 C3 979 100% 315 630 440 191 0 U V Z Williams Dr Treyway Ln Airline Rd 652 0.12 2 2 C3 979 100% 315 156 109 47 0 Blanche Moore Dr SH 359 Williams Dr 1290 0.24 1 1 Cl 100% 360 175 0 175 0 j a Betty Jean Dr Williams Dr Holly Rd 2616 0.50 1 1 1 Cl 1 0 1 100% 360 357 0 357 0 LL St Andrews Dr Holly Rd Woolritlge Rd 2916 0.55 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 399 0 399 0 AL,U^ Q St Andrews Dr Woolritlge Rd Long Meadow Dr 1451 0.27 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 199 0 199 0 V/ O a Long Meadow Dr St Andrews Dr Saratoga Blvd 1267 0.24 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 173 0 173 0 Long Meadow Dr Saratoga Blvd Hunt Dr 1797 0.34 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 244 0 2440 N (�U0 Hunt Dr Saratoga Blvd Long Meadow Dr 909 0.17 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 124 0 124 0 W O o Hunt Dr Long Meadow Dr Timbergate Dr 1970 0.37 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 269 0 269 0 0 } z Timbergate Drive Snowgoose Rtl/Glassgow Dr Hunt Dr 735 0.14 1 1 C1 407 100% 360 100 57 44 0 ,^ F Timbergate Drive Hunt Dr SStaples St 1707 0.32 1 1 Cl 407 100% 360 233 132 101 0 V/ U Timbergate Drive S Staples St Patti Dr 0.00 1 1 C1 407 100% 360 0 0 0 0 = X Timbergate Drive Patti Dr 911'E at Patti Dr 0.00 1 1 Cl 407 100% 360 0 0 0 0 W Woolritlge Rd Everhart Rd St Andrews St 2602 0.49 1 1 Cl340 100% 360 355 169 197 0 Woolritlge Rd St Andrews St SStaples St 3126 0.59 1 1 Cl 340 100% 360 426 202 225 0 O,^ Woolritlge Rd SStaples St Patton St 2150 0.41 2 2 C3 1444100% 315 513 599 -75 75 V/ Woolritlge Rd Patton St Parkway Dr 157 0.03 2 2 C3 1444 100% 315 37 43 -5 5 Woolritlge Rd Parkway Dr Cimarron Blvd 2969 0.56 2 2 C3 1444 100% 315 709 912 -103 103 Trey Way Ln jWiILi2T,Dr Holly Rd 2619 0.50 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 357 0 357 0 S Staples St SH 359 Williams Dr 1291 0.24 2 2 Al 3922 100% 540 524 951 1 127 427 S Staples St jWillia,,s Dr Holly Rd 2615 0.50 2 2 Al 3922 100% 540 1,070 1,942 -973 973 S Staples St Holly Rtl Woolritlge Rd 2679 0.51 2 2 Al 4195 100% 540 1,096 2,123 -1,027 1,027 S Staples St Woolritlge Rtl Spohn Dr 1699 0.32 2 2 Al 2927 100% 540 695 942 -247 247 S Staples St Spohn Dr Saratoga Blvd 972 0.19 2 2 Al 2903 100% 540 399 516 -119 119 S Staples St Saratoga Blvd Timbergate Dr 2662 0.50 2 2 A2 2765 100% 720 1,452 1,394 59 0 S Staples St Tmbergate Dr Lipes Blvd 2644 0.50 2 2 A2 2199 100% 720 1,442 1,096 346 0 HS AS ic 1.0 `a3 o,w � S Staples St Lipes Blvd Yorktown Blvd 2644 0.50 2 2 A2 1744 100% 720 1,442 974 569 0 Spohn Dr S Spohn Dr Saratoga Blvd 905 0.17 2 2 C3 0 100% 315 216 0 216 0 N �, S11.9111e Rd Everhart Rd Timbergate Dr 3034 0.57 1 1 C1 393 100% 360 414 220 194 0 idj Glasgow Dr Timbergate Dr Sunwood Dr 2714 0.51 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 370 0 370 0 LU Cedar Pass Dr Sun Valley Dr Grand Jtion Dr 960 0.19 1 1 Cl 396 100% 360 131 70 61 0 O , W unc Cedar Pass Dr Grand Junction Dr Everhart Rd 3304 0.63 1 1 C1 434 100% 360 451 272 179 0 2LU z_ �'. cedar Pass Dr Everhart Rd Sunwood Dr 2627 0.50 1 1 C1 290 100% 360 358 144 214 0 Sunwood Dr cedar Pass Dr Lipes Blvd 156 0.03 1 1 Cl 290 100% 360 21 9 13 0 a_ Lipes Blvd Yorktown Blvd Sunwood Dr 2912 0.55 1 1 Cl 101 100% 360 397 55 342 0 IqZw Lipes Blvd Sunwood Dr SStaples St 2695 0.51 1 1 Cl 101 100% 360 366 51 315 0 `W Lipes Blvd S Staples St Gingerberry Dr 1437 0.27 1 1 Cl 499 100% 360 196 136 60 0 3 Lipes Blvd Gingerberry Dr Spanish Wootl Dr 627 0.12 1 1 Cl 499 100% 360 96 59 26 0 8 Lipes Blvd Spanish Wood Dr erockhampton St 1919 0.36 1 1 Cl 499 100% 360 262 191 90 0 Lipes Blvd erockhampton St Cimarron Blvd 1359 0.26 1 1 C1 499 100% 360 195 129 57 0 Patton St Holly Rd Woolridge Rd 2701 0.51 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 369 0 369 0 Parkway Dr Woolridge Rd Spohn Dr 1199 0.23 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 164 0 164 0 Spohn Dr S Staples St Spohn S 1336 0.25 2 2 C3 0 100% 315 319 0 319 0 Spohn Dr Spohn S Parkway Dr 1215 0.23 2 2 C3 0 100% 315 290 0 290 0 Patti Dr Saratoga Blvd Du nbarton Oaks Dr 991 0.19 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 135 0 135 0 Patti Dr -b-.d Oaks Dr Commonwealth Dr 920 0.16 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 112 0 112 0 Simpson Dr Saratoga Blvd 486'N of-ba-d Oaks Dr 475 0.09 1 1 Pi 0 100% 360 65 0 65 0 D unb-d Oaks Dr Patti Dr 125'W of Durham Dr 939 0.16 1 1 Cl 93 100% 360 114 13 101 0 N Dunbarton Oaks Dr 125'W of Durham Dr Cimarron Blvd 2761 0.52 1 1 Cl 93 100% 360 377 43 333 0 _ Spanish Wood Dr Lipes Blvd Stonehenge Dr 1207 0.23 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 165 0 165 0 Q } Stonehenge Spanish Wood Dr erockhampton St 0.00 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 0 0 0 0 W Gingerberry Dr Lipes Blvd Loire Blvd 2014 0.39 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 275 0 275 0 F 0 Loire Blvd Gingerberry Dr Yorktown Blvd 1334 0.25 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 192 0 192 0 Q Ln Z erockhampton St Stonehenge St Cimarron Blvd 1490 0.29 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 202 0 202 0 WLn W erockhampton St Stonehenge St Lipes Blvd 0.00 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 0 0 0 0 Airline Rd SH 359 Williams Dr 1455 0.29 2 2 Al 3263 50% 540 299 450 -152 152 U V Z Airline Rd Williams Dr Holly Rd 2929 0.55 2 2 Al 1605 50% 540 599 445 154 0 \ } Airline Rd Holly Rd Cimarron Blvd 2090 0.39 2 2 Al 2991 50% 540 425 599 -164 164 Cimarron Blvd Airline Rd Woolridge Rd 990 0.17 2 2 Al 2000 50% 540 190 167 13 0 W d Cimarron Blvd Woolridge Rd Saratoga Blvd 2649 0.50 2 2 Al 2000 50% 540 542 502 40 0 ,,n^ 0 Cimarron Blvd Saratoga Blvd Du nbarton Oaks Dr 1290 0.24 2 2 Al 2539 50% 540 264 310 16 46 V/ 0 a Cimarron Blvd -b-.d Oaks Dr erockhampton St 1107 0.21 2 2 Al 2539 50% 540 226 266 10 40 N V 0 Cimarron Blvd erockhampton St Lipes Blvd 2992 0.55 2 2 Al 0 50% 540 590 0 590 0 LL W Cimarron Blvd Lipes Blvd Yorktown Blvd 2631 0.50 2 2 Al 1333 50% 540 539 332 206 0 W 0 (, Saratoga Blvd Weber Rd Aaron Dr 1699 0.32 3 3 A3 3059 100% 720 1,391 979 403 0 Z Saratoga Blvd Aaron Dr Shea Pkwy 970 0.16 3 3 A3 3059 100% 720 712 504 209 0 ~ F Saratoga Blvd Shea Pkwy EShea Pkwy 165 0.03 3 3 A3 3059 100% 720 135 96 39 0 = V Saratoga Blvd EShea Pkwy Sanders Dr 665 0.13 3 3 A3 3059 100% 720 544 395 159 0 X Saratoga Blvd Sanders Dr Acushnet Dr 1000 0.19 3 3 A3 3059 100% 720 919 1 579 239 0 ? W Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr Everhart Rd 995 0.17 3 3 A3 3059 100% 720 724 513 211 0 O Saratoga Blvd Everhart Rd Player St 1150 0.22 3 3 A3 3215 100% 720 941 700 241 0 ,^ Saratoga Blvd Player St Long Meadow Dr 930 0.19 3 3 A3 3215 100% 720 761 566 195 0 V/ Saratoga Blvd Long Meadow Dr Hunt Dr 735 0.14 3 3 A3 3215 100% 720 601 447 154 0 Saratoga Blvd Hunt Dr SStaples St 2490 0.47 3 3 A3 3526 100% 720 2,029 1,656 373 0 Saratoga Blvd S Staples St Spohn Dr S 1274 0.24 3 3 A3 3923 100% 720 1,042 922 120 0 Saratoga Blvd Spohn DrS Patti Dr 442 0.09 3 3 A3 3923 100% 720 362 320 42 0 Saratoga Blvd Patti Dr Simpsons Dr 942 0.16 2 2 A2 3923 100% 720 459 610 -150 150 Saratoga Blvd Simpsons Dr Cimarron Blvd 2719 0.51 1 2 2 A2 3923 100% 720 1,493 1,969 -496 496 pp 55,036 38,010 17,026 4,829 HS ic 1.0 `a3 SOUTHSIDE4(SERVICE AREA 13)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY O Peak Exist Lanes Designation Hour %In N - e Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) based on Volume Servici z Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi ^'w NB SB EB WB Aerial Area Q W OW' Yorktown Blvd Weber Rd Sun Valley Dr 1767 0.33 2 2 A2 1546 100% 720 964 518 446 0 W= Yorktown Blvd Sun Valley Dr Oso Pkwy 3909 0.74 2 2 A2 1355 100% 720 2,132 1,003 1,129 0 a Yorktown Blvd Oso Pkwy Everhart Rd 2390 0.45 2 2 A2 1355 100% 720 1,304 613 690 0 Q -- V.rkt.wn Blvd Everhart Rd Lipes Blvd 2190 0.41 2 2 A2 1591 100% 720 1,195 660 534 0 a W Yorktown Blvd Lipes Blvd S Staples St 3115 0.59 2 2 A2 1591 100% 720 1,699 939 760 0 3 z Oso Pkwy SStaple,St Everhart Rd 5868 1.11 1 1 P1 128 100% 360 800 143 657 0 g w Oso Pkwy Everhart Rd Yorktown Blvd 3678 0.70 1 1 P1 128 100% 360 502 89 412 0 Everhart Rd Yorktown Blvd Oso Pkwy 1248 0.24 2 2 C3 768 100% 315 298 182 116 0 Boston Dr Yorktown Blvd SStaples St 4168 0.79 1 1 Cl 101 100% 360 568 79 489 0 S Oso Pkwy Deer Park Dr 463'E of Fox Glove Ln 5064 0.96 1 1 Al 0 100% 540 1,036 0 1,036 0 Weber Road Yorktown Blvd City Limits 1984 0.38 2 2 Al 1626 100% 540 812 611 201 0 S Staples St Yorktown Blvd Strasbourg Dr 875 0.17 2 2 A2 1744 50% 720 239 145 94 0 S Staples St iSt,v,bourg Dr Boston Dr 450 0.09 2 2 A2 1744 50% 720 123 74 48 0 S Staples St Boston Dr Oso Pkwy 1585 0.30 2 2 A2 1248 50% 720 432 187 245 0 Yorktown Blvd S Staples St Loire Blvd 2397 0.45 2 2 A2 1588 50% 720 654 361 293 0 M Yorktown Blvd Loire Blvd Cimarron Blvd 2904 0.55 2 2 A2 1588 50% 720 792 437 355 0 r Yorktown Blvd Cimarron Blvd 309'W of W Logan Dr 3169 0.60 2 2 A2 1445 50% 720 864 434 431 0 Yorktown Blvd 309'W of W Logan Dr Rodd Field Rd 2075 0.39 2 2 A2 1360 50% 720 566 267 299 0 W Yorktown Blvd Rodd Field Rd Freds Folly Dr 2496 0.47 1 1 Cl 1276 50% 360 170 302 -131 131 Yorktown Blvd Fred,Folly Dr 1274'E of Starry Rd 4070 0.77 1 1 Cl 1276 50% 360 278 492 -214 214 0 Yorktown Blvd 1274'E of Starry Rd Cay.d el Oso(Water Feature) 18960.36 1 1 Cl 678 50% 360 129 122 8 0 Ln Z S LU Staples St Yorktown Blvd Strasburg Dr 874 0.17 2 2 A3 1248 50% 720 238 103 135 0 W SStaples St Strasburg Dr Boston Dr 450 0.09 2 2 A3 1248 50% 720 123 53 70 0 U V Z SStaples St Boston Dr Oso Pkwy 1730 0.33 2 2 A3 1248 1 50% 720 472 204 1 2670 ; } S Staples St Oso Pkwy 185'E of S Oso Pkwy 3725 0.71 2 2 A3 1248 1 50% 720 1,016 440 576 0 so S Staples St 185'E of S Oso Pkwy S Oso Pkwy 185 0.04 2 2 1 1 A3 1248 50% 720 50 22 29 0 W a- s S Staples St S Oso Pkwy Kitty Hawk Dr 1744 0.332 2 Al 1248 50% 540 357 206 151 0 U) = Q S Staples St Kitty Hawk Dr Co Rd 41 2637 0.50 2 2 Al 1248 50% 540 539 312 228 0 V O Strasbourg Dr SStaples St Loire Blvd 2374 0.45 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 324 0 324 0 LL W Strasbourg Dr Loire Blvd Grenoble Dr 2439 0.46 1 1 Cl 0 100% W 0 360 333 0 333 0 al Strasbourg Dr Grenoble Dr Marseille Dr 1478 0.28 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 202 0 202 0 F Z Loire Blvd Yorktown Blvd Strasbourg Dr 984 0.19 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 134 0 134 0 F F Cimarron Blvd Yorktown Blvd Grenoble Dr 2146 0.41 2 2 C3 1436 100% 315 512 584 -72 72 = (� Cimarron Blvd Grenoble Dr Kodiak Dr 1998 0.38 2 2 Cl 1436 100% 360 545 544 1 0 Cimarron Blvd Kodiak Dr Lens Dr 1722 0.33 1 1 Cl 1436 1 100% 360 235 468 -234 234 ? W Cimarron Blvd Lens Dr Legacy Pt 1461 0.28 1 1 Pl 1436 100% 360 199 397 -198 198 Road H/Dalmation Dr Safety Steel Dr 552'S of Yorktown Blvd 2425 0.46 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 331 0 331 0 Grenoble Dr Strasbourg Dr Cimarron Blvd 1046 0.20 1 1 Cl 82 100% 360 143 16 126 0 Bison Dr Cimarron BlvdN.rthwind Dr 2483 0.47 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 339 0 339 0 Marseille Dr Strasbourg Dr Oso Pkwy 2081 0.39 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 284 0 284 0 Safety Steel Dr 1003'W of Road H Road H/Dalmation Dr 976 0.18 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 133 0 133 0 Oso Pkwy Cimarron Blvd Marselle Dr 695 0.13 1 1 Pi 210 100% 360 95 28 67 0 Oso Pkwy Marselle Dr S Staples St 5620 1.06 1 1 Pi 327 100% 360 766 348 419 0 Kodiak Dr Cimarron Blvd Wolverine Dr 1762 0.33 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 240 0 240 0 Wolverine Dr Kodiak Dr La Salle Dr 248 0.05 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 34 0 34 0 La Salle Dr Wolverine Dr Rock Crest Dr 900 0.17 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 123 0 123 0 Fred's Folly Dr Yorktown Blvd Stampede Rd 1720 0.33 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 235 0 235 0 23,555 11,382 12,173 849 HS HS Jc 1.0 `a3 SOUTHSIDE 3(SERVICE AREA 14)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY Z Designation Peak %In Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Existing Q Exist Lanes Hour Excess Capacity ,w Roadway From To Length(mi( based on Service Capacity Supply Demand Deficiencies VolumePk-Hr Veh-Mi' o¢ Aerial Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Pk-Hr Total Pk-Hr Veh-Mi -" NB SB EB WR 2D2Ddj Williams Dr Airline Rd Nile Dr 1.00 2 2 C3 466 100% 315 629 465 164 0 LU ' Williams Dr Nae DrRotltl Field Rd 0.39 2 2 c3 991 l00% 315 239 339 -99 99 Q W a Nile Dr SH 358 Williams Dr 0.24 1 1 cl 602 l00% 360 96 145 -59 59 Z z Rotltl Fieltl Rd SH 358 Williams Dr 0.24 2 2 Al 2,242 l00% 540 259 539 -279 279 ILL _ Rotltl Fidid Rd Williams Dr HOIIy Rd 0.49 z z Al 2,739 l00% 540 529 1,342 Alz 912 Rotltl Fieltl Rd Holly Rd 1313'N of Woolritlge Rtl 0.26 2 2 Al 2,496 100% 540 291 646 -365 365 Q Z a Rotltl Fieltl Rd 1313'N of Woolritlge Rd Woolritlge Rd 0.25 2 2 Al 2,496 100% 540 270 621 -351 351 `W Rotltl Fieltl Rd Woolritlge Rd Saratoga Blvd 0.5 2 2 Al 2,166 100% 540 540 1,093 -543 543 3 Rotltl Fieltl Rd Saratoga Blvd Brooke Rd 0.5 2 2 A2 1,392 100% 720 720 691 29 0 8 Rotltl Fieltl Rd Brooke Rd Slough Rd 0.5 2 2 A2 1,296 100% 720 720 649 72 0 Rotltl Fieltl Rd Slough Rd Yorktown Blvd 0.5 2 2 A2 1,103 100% 720 720 552 169 0 Lexington Rd SH 358 1365'S.f SH 359 0.26 1 1 Cl 126 100% 360 94 33 61 0 Lexington Rd 1365'S.f SH 359 Holly Rd 0.51 1 1 Cl 126 100% 360 194 64 119 0 Eddis J.slid Rd SH 358 512'S.f SH 359 0.1 2 2 Cl 692 100% 360 72 69 4 0 Ennisloslin Rd Williams Dr Holly Rd 0.5 2 2 Al 692 100% 540 540 341 199 0 Edd is J.slid Rd Holly Rd Woodridge Rd 0.51 2 2 C2 100% 300 306 0 306 0 Pa.I Jones Ave SH 358 1540'S of SH 359 0.29 1 1 Cl 237 100% 360 104 69 36 0 -IJones Ave 1540'S.f SH359 Holly Rd 0.5 1 1 Cl 172 100% 360 190 96 94 0 Holly Rd Airline Rd Rotltl Fieltl Rd 1.13 2 2 Al 0 100% 540 1,220 0 1,220 0 Holly Rd Rotltl Fieltl Rd Lexington Rd 0.5 1 1 C2 450 100% 300 150 225 -75 75 Holly Rd Lexington Rd Ennis loslin Rd 0.29 1 1 C2 450 100% 300 94 126 -42 42 Q } Holly Rd Ennis J.slid Rd Pa.IJ.d's Ave 0.47 1 1 Cl 246 100% 360 169 115 54 0 W Holly Rd Pa ulJones Ave 2571'E of Halc.d St 0.76 1 1 Cl 752 100% 360 274 572 -299 299 0 Woolritlge Rd Airline Rd Wootlway Dr 0.67 2 2 C3 0 100% 315 422 0 422 0 Z Woolritlge Rd Wootlway Dr Rotltl Fieltl Rd 0.21 2 2 C3 0 100% 315 132 0 132 0 W Woolritlge Rtl Rotltl Fieltl Rd Victoria Park Dr 0.63 1 1 Cl 503 100% 360 227 317 -90 90 LU U = Z Woolritlge Rd Victoria Park Dr Ennis Joslin Rd 0.15 1 1 C1 503 100% 360 54 75 -21 21 V - W..Iridg'Rd Ennis Joslin Rd Oso Pkwy 0.57 1 1 Cl 503 100% 360 205 297 -92 92 j a Saratoga Blvd Cimarron Blvd Airline Rd 0.39 2 2 A2 0 100% 720 547 0 547 0 LL Saratoga Blvd Airline Rd Rotltl Fieltl Rd 0.63 2 2 A2 1,601 100% 720 907 1,009 -102 102 W a Victoria Pa r0 k Dr Woolritlge Rd Oso Pkwy 0.45 1 1 Cl 135 100% 360 162 61 101 0 ,^ B...khampt.d St Cimarron Blvd Stone H'dg'St 0.4 1 1 Cl 135 100% 360 14454 90 0 v, Q Q B...khampt.d St Stone Hedge St Lipes Blvd 0.33 1 1 Cl 135 100% 360 119 45 74 0 U er.ckhampt.d St La Rochelle Way Lipes Blvd 0.61 1 1 Cl 135 100% 360 220 92 137 0 M LL W Lipes Blvd Cimarron Blvd Bronx Dr 0.39 1 1 Cl 495 100% 360 140 193 -53 53 W 0 0 Lipes Blvd 1724'W of Airline Crossing Dr Airline Rd 0.31 1 1 Cl 495 100% 360 112 153 12 42 Q } Z Yorktown Blvd Cimarron Blvd 3091W of W Logan Dr 0.6 2 2 A2 1,445 100% 720 964 967 -3 3 F F Yorktown Blvd 309'W of W Logan Dr Rotltl Fieltl Rd 0.39 2 2 A2 1,360 100% 720 562 530 31 0 2 U (� Yorktown Blvd Rotltl Fieltl Rd Fretls Folly Dr 0.47 1 1 Cl 1,276 50% 360 95 300 -215 215 Yorktown Blvd Fretls Folly Dr 1274'E of Starry Rd 0.77 1 1 Cl 679 50% 360 139 261 -122 122 ? of Yorktown Blvd 1274'E of Starry Rd Cay.del Oso(-td,Feature) 0.36 1 1 Cl 679 50% 360 65 122 -57 57 Airline Rd SH 358 Williams Dr 0.29 2 2 Al 3,263 50% 540 151 457 -306 306 O 0,^ Airline Rd Williams Dr Holly Rd 0.55 2 2 Al 3,701 50% 540 297 1,019 -721 721 V/ Airline Rd Holly Rd Cimarron Blvd 0.39 2 2 Al 2,991 50% 540 211 593 -373 373 Airline Rd Cimarron Blvd Woolritlge Rd 0.17 2 2 Al 1,196 50% 540 92 102 -10 10 Airline Rd W..Iri dg'Rd Saratoga Blvtl I 0.56 2 2 Al 1,165 100% 540 605 652 17 47 Airline Rd Saratoga Blvd Brooke Rd 0.56 2 2 Al 1,147 100% 540 605 643 -39 39 Airline Rd Brooke Rd Lipes Blvd 0.52 2 2 Al 664 100% 540 562 345 216 0 Fretls Folly Dr Slough Rd 1320'Sof Sl..gh Rd 0.24 1 1 Cl 100% 360 96 0 96 0 Slough Rd Airline Rd Rotltl Fieltl Rd 0.15 2 2 Cl 3269 100% 360 109 55 53 0 e Slough Rd Rotltl Fieltl Rd 292'W of Fretls Folly Dr 0.5 1 1 Cl 369 100% 360 190 195 -5 5 ez Slough Rd 292'W of Fretls Folly Dr Fretls Folly Dr 0.05 1 1 Cl 369 100% 360 19 19 0 0 Slough Rd Fretls Folly Dr 560'E of Amethyst Dr 0.22 1 1 Cl 369 100% 360 79 91 -2 2 16,469 11),2631 -794 5,211 HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW LONDON(SERVICE AREA 15)EXISTING ROADWAYS Designation %In Length Exist Lanes Peak Hour Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies - Roadway From To based on Service } (mi) Volume Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi Lr) Area NB F 0 S—BFE B WB S Staples St Oso Pkwy Oso Creek 0.22 2 2 C3 1248 100% 315 277 274 3 0 a y Z SStaples St SOso kwy Kitty Hawk Dr 0.37 2 2 Al 1248 100% 540 789 456 333 0 W = W S Staples St Kitty Hawk Dr Co Rd 41 0.50 2 2 Al 1248 100% 540 1,079 623 456 0 Z Co Rd 41 Co Rd 20A PR E-W Roadway 0.50 1 1 Cl No Counts 50% 360 179 0 a to } Co Rd 41 PR E-W Roadway S Staples St 0.50 1 1 Cl No Counts 50% 360 180 - - 0 U d Kitty Hawk Dr S Staples St Marauder Dr 0.45 1 1 Cl No Counts 100% 360 324 - - 0 0 S Oso Pkwy Deer Park Rd S Staples St 1.05 1 1MC Pl No Counts 100% 360 756 - - 0 0 0 S Oso Pkwy SStaples St City Limits 1.07 1 1Pl No Counts 100% 360 770 - - 0 W LL CR 33 CR 43 Lady Claudia St 0.4 1 1Cl No Counts 100% 360 288 - - 0 0 CR 33 Lady Claudia St City Limits 0.65 1 1l No Counts 100% 360 468 - - 0 } Z 4,354 1,353 792 0 1 z O Uco X Z W O J H. HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ - FLOUR BLUFF 1(S-A-I6)EXISTINGROAD-INVENTORY Eairt Lanes Peak Hour Volume Veh-Mi Capacity -Mi Supply -Mi Demand Ex cess Capacity Eairting Deficiencies Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) NB SB EB WB Designation Aerial) 2021 %In SerNce Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi° W Hustl In Hornet Dr ldron Rd Deba Ln 730 0.14 1 1 Cl 462 10 6 360 50 64 -14 14 Wa Hustlln Homet Dr D,-Ln Laguna Shores Rd 449 o.o9 1 1 C1 237 lom 360 31 20 11 o Don Patrldo Rd Flour Bluff Dr Emmaus Dr 1620 o.31 1 1 C1 93 lom 360 110 29 82 o 2 Don Patrldo Rd Emmaus Dr Waldron Rd 159 o.o3 1 1 C1 126 lom 360 11 4 7 o 6aham Rd Cantea Bay Dr Flour Bluff Dr 1511 0.29 1 1 C1 109 lom 360 - 31 72 o 6aham Rd Flour Bluff Dr Meeks Rd 2257 0.43 1 1 C1 109 lom 360 154 46 lob o 6aham Rd Meeks Rd Waldron Rd 166 o.o3 1 1 C1 121 lom 360 11 4 7 o 6aham Rd Waldron Rd Laguna Shores Rd 1635 o.31 1 1 C1 68 lom 360 111 21 90 o Compton Rd Flour Bluff Dr 1st-1-1 Dr 906 0.17 1 1 Cl 164 106 360 62 28 34 0 Compton Rd 1st Natlonal Dr Waldron Rd 6206 1.18 1 1 C1 261 lom 1 360 423 1 306 117 o Knld:erbocker St Waldron Rd Laguna Shores Rd 33KY3 0.63 2 2 C1 464 lom 360 450 290 160 o Purdue Rd Retia Dr Waldron Rd 3641 1 0.691 1 C1 378 lom 360 248 261 -13 13 (p 1,Natlonal Dr Compton Rd SPadre Island Dr 531 0.10 1 1 Cl No mune available 10 6 360 36 o r Matlod<St Flour Bluff Dr MIIIt,Dr 3935 0.75 1 1 C1 127 lo�6 360 268 95 174 o aarldeSt MI I.,Dr Nas Dr 2019 0.38 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 138 - - 0 darlde3t Nas Dr Waldron Rd 1100 0.21 1 1 Cl No mune available 106 360 JS - - 0 W darlde St Waldron Rd Mount Dr 1290 0.24 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 88 - - o Mount Dr darlde St Lakeside Dr 400 0.08 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 27 - - o Q F 0 Lakeside Dr Mount Dr John F Kennedy Memorial Ca useway 2460 0.47 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 168 - - o D Z LagunaShores Rd JFK Memorial Causeway Knld<erbod<er St 1145 0.22 1 1 Pl 360 lom 360 78 78 o o W W Laguna Shores Rd Knld<erbod<er St 6aham Rd 470 o.o9 1 1 Pl 360 lom 360 1 32 32 o o U Laguna Shores Rd 6aham Rd Don Patrldo Rd Extension 1669 0.32 1 1 Pl 564 lom 360 114 178 fig 65 V Z Laguna Shores Rd Don Patrldo Rd Extension Hustlln Hornet Dr 1376 0.26 1 1 Pl 564 lom 360 94 147 -53 53 Laguna Shores Rd Hustlln Hornet Dr Beasley Rd 345 0.07 1 1 1 1 1 Pl 564 5M 360 12 18 -7 7 NAS Dr 975 ft north of Navy Dr Waldron Rd 7300 1.38 ZZ Al 1,838 l00% 540 1,493 2,541 -1,048 1,048 W d Waldron Rd NASDr John F Kennedy Memorial Ca useway 1273 0.24 1 1 Pl 611 lom 360 87 147 61 61 Waldron Rd John F Kennedy Memorial Ca usewey Compton Rd 2640 0.50 2 2 Al 1,538 lom 540 540 819 -279 279 v, 0 -IdronRd ComptonRd -h-Rd 2865 0.54 2 2 Al 1,870 lom 540 586 1,015 429 429 0 Q -IdronRd -h-Rd Don Patrldo Rd 441 0.08 2 2 Al 1,756 5M 540 45 73 -28 28 r V 0 -IdronRd DonPao-ldoRd StardustLn(PR 5nt) 4312 0.82 2 2 Al 1,370 5M 540 441 559 -Ila Ila LL LL Waldron Rd Stardust Ln(PR S-ent) Purdue Rd 1929 0.37 2 2 Al 1,370 5M 540 197 250 -53 53 LL 0 0 Waldron Rd Purdue Rd Hustlln Hornet Dr 2975 0.56 2 2 Al 1,497 5M 540 304 422 1 117 117 Z Retta Dr Purdue Rd DIVISIon Rd 1320 0.25 1 1 C1 57 lom 360 90 14 76 o J F Flour Bluff Dr 425 ft north of 9r nblyd St -fl.,k St 1325 0.25 1 1 C1 37 lom 360 90 9 81 o (� Flour Bluff Dr -1-k St John F Kennedy Memorial Ca useway 1530 0.29 1 1 Cl 397 lom 360 104 115 -11 11 X Flour Bluff Dr John F Kennedy Memorial Ca usewey Compton Rd 1405 o 2 2 Al 1,814 lom 540 287 483 -195 19g W Flour Bluff Dr Compton Rd G--Rd 1040 0.20 2 2 Al 1,976 lom 540 213 389 -176 176 Flour Bluff Dr 6aham Rd Don Patrldo Rd 2650 0.50 2 2 Al 1,536 lom 540 542 821 -279 279 FlO Flour Bluff Dr Don Patrldo Rd DIVISIon Rd 1320 0.25 1 1 C1 1,536 lom 360 90 409 -319 319 SunnycresrSt DM,,n Rd Don Patrldo Rd 1311 0.25 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 89 o J Emmaus Dr Don Patrldo Rd Cornerstone Dr l000 o.19 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 68 o LL Meeks Rd Cornerstone Dr 6aham Rd 1650 0.31 1 1 Cl No mune available lom 360 113 o Cornersrone Dr Meeks Rd Emmaus Dr 350 0.07 1 1 C1 No mune available lom 360 24 o 8,299 9,720 -2,297 3,265 zz r HIS jc 1.0 `a3 O � FLOUR BLUFF 2(SERVICEAREA 17)-TING ROADWAY INVENTORY Eais[Lanes Designation Peak Hour Volume %In Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Eairting Deficiencies r z Roadway From To Length(ft) Length(mi) 1 NB SB EB WB (Aerial) 2021 Service Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Tota lr Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi - Vorktown Blvtl Laguna Shores Rd -Id-Rd 4635 0.88 1 1 Cl 392 100% 360 316 345 -29 29 Yorktown Blvtl Waltlron Rd Flour Bluff Dr 5300 1.00 1 1 Pl 555 100% 360 361 557 -196 196 v Yorktown Blvtl Flour Bluff Dr Scarlet Oak Dr 2662 0.50 1 1 Pl 555 100% 360 182 280 -98 98 W Yorktown Blvtl Scarlet Oak Dr Berlet Ln 1339 0.25 1 1 Pl 803 100% 360 91 204 -112 112 Yorktown Blvtl Berlet Ln Roscher Rd 1315 0.25 1 1 Pi 803 100% 360 90 200 -110 110 3 Yorktown Blvtl Roscher Rd 1894 ft Wert&Roscher Rd 1890 0.36 1 1 Cl 803 100% 360 129 288 -159 159 gw Roscher Rd Yorktown Blvtl Ramfieltl Rd 2600 0.50 1 1 Cl 53 100% 360 180 26 154 0 Roscher Rd Ramfieltl Rtl Caribbean Dr 2601 0.50 1 1 Cl 53 100% 360 180 26 154 0 Roscher Rd Caribbean Dr Glenoak Dr.(2340 ft north of Caribbean D 2634 0.50 1 1 Cl 53 100% 360 180 26 153 0 Ramfieltl Rd Roscher Rd Scarlet Oak Dr 1598 0.30 1 1 Cl No available counts 100% 360 109o 0 0 Ramfieltl Rtl Scarlet Oak Dr Flour Bluff Dr 3684 0.70 1 1 Cl No available counts 100% 360 251 0 0 0 Caribbean Dr Roscher Rd 6oltlen Oak Dr EM 2541 0.48 1 1 Cl 45 100% 360 173 22 151 0 Caribbean Dr Goltlen Oak Dr EM Purtlue Rd EM 350 0.07 1 1 Cl 45 100% 360 24 3 21 0 Caribbean Dr Purtlue Rd EM Flour Bluff Dr 1851 0.351 1 Cl 45 100% 360 126 16 110 0 Caribbean Dr Flour Bluff Dr Waltlron Rtl 5822 1.10 1 1 Cl 45 100% 360 397 50 347 0 Caribbean Dr Waltlron Rd Jamaica Dr 2681 0.51 1 1 Cl 305 100% 360 183 175 8 0 r Caribbean Dr Jamaica Dr Laguna Shores Rd 1606 0.30 1 1 Cl 208 100% 360 110 63 46 0 r Caribbean Dr Laguna Shores Rd Entl of Rd l7 ft Bart of Laguna Village Dr) 777 0.15 1 1 Cl 208 100% 360 53 31 22 0 Glenoak Dr 4050 ft Overt of Flour Bluff Dr Flour Bluff Dr 4050 0.55 1 1 Cl 579 100% 360 276 404 -168 168 } - Glenoak Dr Flour Bluff Dr Retta Dr 1807 0.34 1 1 Cl 579 100% 360 123 198 -55 55 Lu Glenoak Dr R-Dr St Peter St 704 0.13 1 1 Cl 526 100% 360 48 50 -22 22 Glenoak Dr St Peter St Waltlron Rd 2770 0.521 1 Cl 526 100% 360 189 276 -85 85 Q p 0 ak GlenoDr Waltlron Rd Debra Ln 2673 0.51 1 1 Cl 249 100% 360 182 126 56 0W Z Glenoak Dr Debra Ln Laguna Shores Rd 1497 0.28 1 1 Cl 13 100% 360 102 4 98 0 Metliterranean Dr Waltlron Rd Otranto Dr 860 0.16 1 1 Cl 138 100% 360 59 22 36 0 U a w Metliteranean Dr Otanto Dr Jamaica Dr 2977 0.56 1 1 Cl 138 100% 360 203 78 125 0 \ u Z Metliterranean Dr Jamaica Dr Laguna Shores Rd 1719 0.33 1 1 Cl 15 100% 360 117 5 112 0 Metliterranean Dr Laguna Shores Rtl 350 ft eart of Laguna Shores Rtl 350 0.07 1 1 Cl 15 100% 360 24 1 23 0 D Scarlet Oak Dr Ramfieltl Rd Yorktown Blvtl 3135 0.59 1 1 Cl No available counts 100% 360 214 0 0 0 W,^ Laguna Shores Rd Hurtlin Hornet Dr Glenoak Dr 2899 0.55 1 1 Pi 523 100% 360 198 287 -89 89 V/ x 0 LagunaShores Rd Glenoak Dr Caribbean Dr 2131 0.40 1 1 Pi 279 100% 360 145 112 33 0 O a Laguna Shores Rd Caribbean Dr Metliterranean Dr 2606 0.50 1 1 Pi 279 100% 360 180 140 41 0 (V V Laguna Shores Rd Metliterranean Dr Yorktown Blvtl 2682 0.51 1 1 Pi 152 100% 360 183d7 96 0 LL LL W Laguna Shores Rd Yorktown Blvtl TO Entl of Rtl(Wyntlale St) 27260.52 1 1 Pi 152 100% 360 186 89 95 0 Waltlron Rtl Hurtlin Hornet Dr Glenoak Dr 2302 0.44 2 2 Al 1,255 100% 500 451 505 -56 56 LL 0 Waltlron Rd Glenoak Dr Caribbean Dr 2603 0.50 2 2 Al 1,057 100% 500 501 529 12 0 F Z Waltlron Rd Caribbean Dr Metliterranean Dr 1740 0.33 1 1 Pi 481 100% 360 119 158 to 40 J F Waltlron Rd Metliterranean Dr Yorktown Blvtl 3569 0.68 1 1 Cl 367 100% 360 243 248 -5 5 V Waltlron Rd Yorktown Blvtl 155 ft south of S-c---!Patrol Rd 2610 0.49 1 1 Cl 35 100% 360 178 18 160 0 X R-D, Glenoak Dr Purtlue Rd 2640 0.50 1 1 Cl 55 100% 360 180 28 152 0 W Flour Bluff Dr Division Rtl Pl-Rtl 1319 0.25 1 1 Cl 1,403 100% 360 90 351 -261 261 Flour Bluff Dr Purtlue Rd Glenoak Dr 2623 0.50 ii Cl 1,078 100% 360 159 536 -357 355 O Flour Bluff Dr Glenoak Dr Caribbean Dr 2663 0.50 1 1 Cl 589 50% 360 91 149 -58 58 J Flour Bluff Dr Caribbean Dr Ramfieltl Rd 2650 0.50 1 1 Cl 589 50% 360 90 148 -55 55 LL Flour Bluff Dr Ramfieltl Rd Yorktown Blvtl 2633 0.50 1 1 Cl 460 50% 360 90 115 -25 25 St Peter St Glenoak Dr St Fangs St 1938 0.37 1 1 Cl No available counts 50% 360 66 0 0 0 St Fangs St St Peter St 122 ft south of St Phillip Court 1290 0.24 1 1 Cl No available counts 100% 360 88 0 0 0 J-ia Dr Metliterranean Dr Caribbean Dr 2605 0.50 1 1 Cl No available counts 100% 360 180 0 0 0 Jamaia Dr Carribbean Dr Glenoak Dr 2514 0.48 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 171 54 118 0 Debra Ln Glenoak Dr Hustlin Hornet Dr 2457 0.47 1 1 Cl 113 100% 360 168 52 115 0 Purtlue Rd Flour Bluff Dr Retta Dr 1807 0.34 1 1 Cl 425 100% 360 123 145 -22 22 Berlet Ln Yorktown Blvtl 878 ft south of Yorktown BHtl 878 0.15 1 1 Pl No available counts 100% 360 60 0 0 012- S,fi91 5,929 394 1 2,046 AS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW PADRE ISLAND 1(SERVICE AREA 19)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY OO Peak Hour Roadw From To Le th Exist Lanes Designation Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies a (m�) (Aerial) Volume Service ay Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi° NB SB EB WB 2D21 Area LU Sea Way Dr TX 361 La Concha Blvd CAR 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 108 0 108 La Concha Blvd Sea Way Dr 460'Sof Bikini Dr 0.22 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 156 0 156 0 Access Road 2 TX 361 834'E of TX 361 0.16 1 1 Cl 6 50% 360 57 0 56 a Z Access R,ad2 834'E,f TX 361 Coastline 0.20 1 1 Cl 6 50% 360 73 1 73 V = LU j TX 361 Beach Access Rd 2 Sea Way Dr 0.78 1 1 RAl 901 100% 675 1,048 699 349 V Z TX 361 Sea Way Dr 1043'N of La Concha Blvd 0.43 1 1 RA1 901 100% 675 580 387 193 N>N TX 361 1043'N of La Concha Blvd 1053'Sof Beach View Dr 0.54 1 1 RA1 901 100% 675 724 483 1 241 Ll. j TX 361 1053'S of each View Dr 1350'N of Beach View Dr 0.45 1 1 RAl 901 100% 675 612 408 204 LU IL TX 361 1350'N of Beach View Dr Seacomber Dr 0.23 1 1 RAl 901 100% 675 313 209 104 U) 0 TX 361 Seacomber Dr 462'N of Porto Village.Dr 0.28 1 1 RAl 901 100% 675 376 251 125 0 TX 361 462'N of Porto Village,Dr 1283'N of Mustang Island Estates Dr 0.46 1 1 RAl 901 100% 675 619 413 206 r V 0 O TX 361 1283'N of Mustang Island Estates Dr 211'N of Manner's Dr 0.51 1 1 RAl 901 100% 675 692 462 230 Q LL 5,359 3,314 2,045 D z 0 Ur a F Z Uy X W W a aHS HS jC 1.0 A3 LU Lu LLI rn PADRE ISI.AND 2(SERVICE AREA 19)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY LU Pea Hour w R..d..y F,.. T. L-gth(,I) Exist L,,,, Designation Volume bin Service V,h-Mi C,p,ckv V,h-Mi Supply V,h-Mi D,,,,d E,c...Capacity Existing Deficiencies p 0 NB I SBI EB I WB (Aerial) .1u,e A,e, Pk-H,Per Lane Pk-H,Total' Pk-H,Total' Pk-H,Veh-Mi' Pk-H,Veh-Me D21 LU En Access R..,l 2 TX 361 834'E f TX 361 D016 1 1 Cl 6 1 i00% 36D 114 1 113 w w Access R..cl 2 834'E of TX 361 c—lim, D.20 1 1 Cl 6 i00% 36D 146 1 145 x > Access R..cl 3 TX 361 Coastline D.6D 1 1 Cl 6 5o% 36D 215 2 214 o TX 361 Gulf Beach Access R..cl 3 Beach Access Rd 2 4.66 1 1 .1 IE U) 938 l00% 675 6,29D 4,369 1,921 Lu >- 6,765 4,373 2,392 o D U) IL w 04 0 U 0 LL W Z 0 (!) Z U) U U) LU w x 12— HS HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW PADRE ISLAND 3(SERVICE AREA 20)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY Peak Exist Lanes Designation Hour %In Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies Roadway From To Length(mi) Service (Aerial) Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi NB SB FEB FWB 2021 5 Padre Island Dr Whitecap Blvd 1160'N of Whitecap Blvd 0.22 2 2 A2 2,604 50% 720 316 286 30 5 Padre Island Dr 1160'N of Whitecap Blvd Commodores Dr 1.02 2 2 A2 2,604 50% 720 1,462 1,322 140 0 5 Padre Island Dr Commodores Dr Headsail Ave 0.11 2 2 A2 2,604 50% 720 159 144 15 N 5 Padre Island Dr Headsail Ave Elbow Cay 0.23 2 2 A2 2,604 50% 720 326 295 31 a S Padre Island Dr Elbow Cay Jackfish Ave 0.12 2 2 A2 2,604 50% 720 166 150 16 LU 5 Padre Island Dr Jackfish Ave Aquarius St 0.53 22 A2 2,604 50% 720 764 691 73 S Padre Island Dr Aquarius St 3608'W of Aquarius St 0.68 2 2 A2 3,123 50% 720 984 1,067 -83 83 F 0 Whitecap Blvd End of Whitecap Blvd Windward Dr 0.27 1 1 C2 87 50% 300 81 12 70 a (/� Z Whitecap Blvd Windward Dr 580'E of 5 Padre Island Dr 0.40 2 2 C2 416 50% 300 241 84 158 V = LU j Whitecap Blvd 580'E of 5 Padre Island Dr 5 Padre Island Dr 0.12 2 2 C2 416 50% 300 75 26 49 _ V Z Access Road 3 TX 361 Coastline 0.60 1 1 C1 0 50% 360 215 0 215 N>N New Port Pass Rd TX 361 Coastline 0.64 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 463 0 463 Zahn Rd TX 361 Coastline 0.74 1 1 C1 0 100% 360 530 0 530 LU ?'Q TX 361 5 Padre Island Dr 572'East of 5 Padre Island Dr 0.11 1 2 RA1 949 100% 675 219 103 117 U) 0 TX 361 572'East of 5 Padre Island Dr Zahn Rd 0.75 1 2 RA1 949 100% 675 1,517 711 806 0 a TX 361 Zahn Rd Newport Pass Rd 1.04 1 1 RA1 949 100% 675 1,404 986 417 M U 0 TX 361 Newport Pass Rd Gulf Beach Access Road 3 1.19 1 1 RA1 949 100% 675 1,604 1,127 477 Q LL X Windward Dr St Barthotomew Ave Robla Dr 0.50 1 1 C1 174 100% 360 361 87 274 z 0 o Windward Dr Robla Dr Leeward Dr 0.14 2 2 Cl 174 100% 360 202 24 177 a Z Windward Dr Leeward Dr White Cap Blvd 0.19 1 1 C1 174 100% 360 140 34 106 J V Leeward Dr St Barthotomew Ave Windward Dr 0.62 1 1 C1 106 100% 360 445 65 379 Sand Dollar Ave Packery Channel Park Rd Verdemar Dr 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 0 0 0 W 5,253 4,076 1,178 g3 LU Ll. a a HS Jc 1.0 A3 O � PADRE ISLAND 4(SERVICE AREA 21)EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY Peak W m Exist Lanes Designation Hour %In Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Existing Deficiencies Q W Roadway From To Length(mi) Service L (Aerial) Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Total' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi W NB SB EB WB 2D21 ww Ir�Iw� 5 Padre Island Dr Nueces County Line Sea Pines Dr 0.28 2 2 A2 75 100% 720 796 21 776 `V 5 Padre Island Dr Sea Pines Dr Padre Balli Park Rd 0.49 2 2 A2 584 100% 720 1,407 285 1,122 Q 2 5 Padre Island Dr Padre Balli Park Rd EncantadaAve 0.02 2 2 A2 584 100% 720 57 12 45 4 W 5 Padre Island Dr Encantada Ave Padre Balli Park Rd 0.02 2 2 A2 584 100% 720 51 10 41 �� 3 5 Padre Island Dr Padre Balli Park Rd Access Rd 5 0.31 2 2 A2 584 100% 720 896 182 714 18 5 Padre Island Dr Access Rd 5 Merida Dr 0.09 2 2 A2 764 100% 720 259 69 190 5 Padre Island Dr Merida Dr Access Rd 0.23 2 2 A2 764 100% 720 648 172 476 5 Padre Island Dr Access Rd 4 1247'N of Access Rd 4 0.24 2 2 A2 764 10% 720 68 18 50 5 Padre Island Dr 1247'N of Access Rd 4 Whitecap Blvd 0.23 2 2 A2 764 100% 720 665 176 489 5 Padre Island Dr Whitecap Blvd 1160'N of Whitecap Blvd 0.22 2 2 A2 764 50% 720 316 84 232 5 Padre Island Dr 1160'N of Whitecap Blvd Commodores Dr 1.02 2 2 A2 1,813 50% 720 1,462 920 542 5 Padre Island Dr Commodores Dr Headsail Ave 0.11 2 2 A2 2,598 50% 720 159 144 16 5 Padre Island Dr Headsail Ave Elbow Cay 0.23 2 2 A2 2,685 50% 720 326 304 22 - 5 Padre Island Dr Elbow Cay Jackfish Ave 0.12 2 2 A2 2,685 50% 720 166 155 11 (V 5 Padre Island Dr Jackfish Ave Aquarius St 0.53 2 2 A2 2,685 50% 720 764 712 52 S Padre Island Dr Aquarius St 3608'W of Aquarius St 0.68 2 2 A2 3,141 50% 720 984 1,073 -89 89 W Coral Vine St Sea Pines Ave All-.&Dr 0.34 1 1 C2 0 100% 300 201 0 201 Access Road 6 2510'E of 5 Padre Island Dr 1250'E of 5 Padre island Dr 0.24 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 172 0 172 F Q Access Road 6 1250'E of 5 Padre island Dr 5 Padre Island Dr 0.24 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 170 0 170 Z Sea Pines Ave 5 Padre Island Dr Palmi.Ave 0.12 2 2 C3 212 100% 315 155 26 129 W W Sea Pines Ave Palmira Ave Coral Vine st 0.27 2 2 C3 212 100% 315 337 57 280 V = Sea Pines Ave Co.l Vine st EI Soccorro Loop 0.45 2 2 C2 212 100% 300 545 96 449 Z Palmi.Ave Sea Pines Ave EncantadaAve 0.52 1 1 Cl 24 100% 360 371 12 359 Palmi.AveEncantadaAve Pescadores Dr 0.15 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 105 0 105 W D Palmi.Ave Pescadores Dr Merida Dr 0.22 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 160 0 160 d Palmi.Ave Merida Dr Access Road 4 0.23 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 163 0 163 O a Palmi.Ave Access Road4 Las Tunas Dr 0.24 1 1 C10 100% 360 170 0 170 V O Merida Dr 5 Padre Island Dr Palmi.Ave 0.12 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 89 0 89 Q LL EncantadaAve 5 Padre Island Dr Palmi.Ave 0.12 1 1 Cl 215 100% 360 89 26 62 LL EncantadaAvePalmira Ave Gypsy St 0.38 1 1 C1 189 100% 360 277 73 204 Gypsy St EncantadaAve Whitecap Blvd 0.81 1 1 Cl 367 100% 360 586 298 288 J F F Whitecap Blvd End of Whitecap Blvd Windward Dr 0.27 1 1 C2 95 50% 300 81 13 68 U (� Whitecap Blvd Windward Dr 580'E of 5 Padre Island Dr 0.40 2 2 C2 563 50% 300 241 113 128 T X Whitecap Blvd 580'E of 5 Padre Island Dr 5 Padre Island Dr 0.12 2 2 C2 563 50% 300 75 35 40 W W Whitecap Blvd 5 Padre Island Dr 660'W of 5 Padre Island Dr 0.13 2 2 C2 1,048 50% 300 75 65 10 aI Whitecap Blvd 660'W of 5 Padre Island Dr Gypsy St 0.37 2 2 C2 1,048 50% 300 224 195 28 Q Whitecap Blvd Gypsy St Aquarius St 0.58 2 2 C2 452 100% 300 697 263 434 Whitecap Blvd Aquarius St West end of Whitecap Blvd 0.78 2 2 C2 293 100% 300 938 229 709 a Aquarius St John F Kennedy Memorial Pkwy Jackfish Ave 0.30 1 1 Cl 195 100% 360 220 59 160 Jackfish Ave Aquarius St 5 Padre Island Dr 0.42 1 1 Cl 82 100% 360 301 34 267 Commodores Dr Aquarius St W Aquarius St E 0.38 1 1 Cl 604 100% 360 273 229 44 Commodores Dr Aquarius St E 5 Padre Island Dr 0.35 1 1 Cl 792 100% 360 255 281 -26 26 Aquarius St Commodores Dr Whitecap Blvd 1.60 1 1 Cl 126 100% 360 1,153 202 951 Commodores Dr Aquarius St E 5 Padre Island Dr 0.27 1 1 Cl 604 100% 360 194 163 31 Eliff Road Padre Balli Park Road 1283'S of Padre Balli Park Road 0.24 1 1 Cl 0 100% 360 175 0 175 17,52D 6,BOB 10,712 115 HS Jc 1.0 A3 APPENDIX B 10-Year Projected Growth Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Northwest l(Service Area 1) 844 4.95 82 2.20 i 4,351 105,000 1 80,000 1 73,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 378 292 367 1 1,038 1 5,388 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Nmthwest2(Service Areal) 1111 4.95 107 2.20 5,729 1 14000 1 120000 1 81500 3.60 3.65 1 5.03 50 1 438 1 410 898 6,628 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0. 2. 99 0.44 Nmthwest3(ServiceArea 3( 1291 4.95 125 20 1 6,658 1 158000 163000 81000 3.60 3.65 5.03 569 595 407 1 1,572 8,230 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq FeetTransportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 CC Airport 1(Service Area 4( 0 4.95 42 2.20 92 1 554,000 1 174,000 1 25,000 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 1996 1 635 1 126 1 2,757 2,850 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 CC Airport 2(Service Area 5( 0 4.95 29 2.20 1 257000 1 102500 1 10000 1 3.60 1 3.65 5.03 926 374 50 1 1,351 1 1,414 1R sidential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Westside l(Service Area 6( 481 4.95 86 1 2.20 1 2,568 450,000 1 213,000 1 110,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 1 1620 1 777 1 553 2,951 5,519 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units I Trip Rate I MultiFamily Units Tdp Rate Vehicle Miles Basic I Service I Retail Basic Service Retail Basic 1 Service I Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Westside 2(Service Area 7( 1969 4.95 353 1 2.20 1 10,525 1 125,000 1 175,000 1 213,000 1 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 450 1 639 1 1,071 1 2,160 12,685 Residential Vehicle-Miles I Non Residential Sq Feet I Transportation Demand Factorl Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 1 1 0.44 Downtown 850 4.95 1 1149 1 2.20 1 6,728 1 11,000 1 333,000 1 57,000 1 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 40 1 1,216 1 287 1 1,542 1 8,270 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units I Trip Rate I MultiFamily Units 1 Trip Rate I Vehicle Miles Basic Sery Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 1 1 0.44 11 1 Baysidel(Service Area9( 51 1 4.95 1 10 1 2.20 1 274 19,000 1 89,000 1 80,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 68 1 325 1 402 1 796 1,070 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MuhiFamily Units Tdp Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Bayside 2(Service Area 10) 1750 4.95 326 2.20 9,382 162,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 0 1 0 1 815 815 10,197 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Southside 1(Service Area 11) 461 4.95 129 2.20 2,565 90,000 190,000 153,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 324 1 694 1 770 1,787 4,352 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Southside 2(Service Area 12) 473 4.95 129 2.20 2,625 21,000 310,000 358,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 76 1,132 1,801 3,008 5,633 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MuhiFamily Units Trip Rate IVehicle Miles Basic I Service I Retail Basic I Service I Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Southside 3(Service Area 14) 2398 4.95 669 2.20 1 13,329 1 21,000 1 222,000 1 136,000 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 1 76 1 811 1 684 1 1,570 14,899 Residential Vehicle-Miles I Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MuhiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total Southside 4(Service Area 13) 1855 4.95 517 2.20 10,320 44,500 79,500 98,800 3.60 3.65 5.03 160 290 497 947 11,268 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total N9 0.44 London(Service Area 15) 1250 5 1450 2.20 1 9,368 1 0 1 12,000 1 15,000 3.60 3.65 5.03 0 44 75 1 119 9,487 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MuhiFamily Unksl Trip Rate IVehicle Miles Basic I Service 1 Retail Basic I Service I Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Flour Bluff 1(Service Area 16) 256 4.95 47 2.20 1,370 34,000 1 29,000 1 256,000 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 1 123 1 106 1 1,287 1 1,516 2,886 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factori Non Residential Vehicle-MilesTotal Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MuhiFamily Unksl Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 Flour Bluff 2(Service Area 17) 226 4.95 41 2.20 1,206 4,000 1 0 3,400 3.60 3.65 5.03 14 1 0 17 1 32 1,238 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basi Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 padre Island 1(ServiceArea IS) 189 4.95 47 2.20 1 1,036 2000 16000 1000 3.60 3.65 5.03 7 1 58 1 5 1 71 1,107 Residential Vehicle-Miles i Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basi Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 padre Island 2(Service Area 11 0 4.95 0 2.20 1 0 1 2000 1 16000 1 1000 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 1 7 58 5 1 71 71 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MultiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basi Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service RetailI Total 0.99 0.44 Padre Island 3(Service Area 20) 62 4.95 IS 2.20 1 338 2000 1 16000 1 27000 1 3.60 1 3.65 1 5.03 1 7 1 58 1 136 201 540 Residential Vehicle-Miles Non Residential Sq Feet Transportation Demand Factor Non Residential Vehicle-Miles Total Vehicle Miles Service Area Single Family Units Trip Rate MohiFamily Units Trip Rate Vehicle Miles Basi Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Total 0.99 0.44 padre Island 4(Service Area 21) 939 4.95 232 2.20 5,154 10500 108000 96000 3.60 3.65 5.03 38 394 483 915 6,069 APPENDIX C CIP Project List by Service Area o � W " NORTHWEST(SERVICE AREA I)PR0lE[T LIST O W o limits MTP wp Peak Hour %in Veh-Mi Capactly Pk- Veha iSupply Pk- Veh-Mi Total E-,L.pacily Pk- 2 Servlce Area Pro(eRNumber Roadway length - Frum To rl-ignati Lanes Volume Service Hr Per Lane Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Hr Veh-Mi 1WL� 1-A FM 1889 Northwest Blvd 765'Nof Lake Grande Ave 0.40 A2 4 648 100% 720 1,154 260 894 `V 1-B FM 1889 765'N Lake Grande Ave lake Grande Ave 0.13 A2 4 648 100% 720 368 83 285 1QwZ 1-C FM 1889 lake Grande Ave 294'Saf Valley View Dr 0.10 A2 4 648 100% 720 286 64 222 iW 1-D CR 69 Northwest Blvd 1690'Sof Northwest Blvd 0.32 Al 4 200 100% 540 691 64 627 1-E CR 69 1690'S of Northwest Blvd CR 52 0.28 Al 4 200 100% 540 605 56 549 8 1-F Northwest Blvd 1644'Wof Wright Moravek Rd Wright Mor-k Rd 0.31 A3 6 2,243 100% 540 11009 698 310 1-G Northwest Blvd Wright Moravek Rd River Trail St 0.40 A3 6 2,243 100% 540 1,292 894 398 1-11 Northwest Blvd River Trail St ERiverview Or 0.41 A3 6 2,243 100% 540 1,317 912 405 1-1 Northwest Blvd ERiverview Dr Wood RNer Rd 0.17 A3 6 2,243 100% 540 565 391 174 1-i Northwest Blvd Wood River Rd Trinity River Dr/FM 1889 0.12 A3 6 2,243 100% 540 397 275 122 1-K Northwest Blvd Trinity River Dr FM 1889 River Hill Or 0.43 A3 6 1,962 100% 541 1,396 844 552 1-L Northwest Blvd River Hill Dr CR 69 0.42 A3 6 1,962 10096 542 1,366 824 542 1-M Northwest Blvd CR 69 Riverside Blvd 0.27 A3 6 3,219 100% 543 880 869 11 - 1-N Northwest Blvd Riverside Blvd River E Or 0.16 A3 6 2,628 10096 544 522 420 102 r 1-0 CR 52 570'E of Emory Dr Emory Dr 0.10 Al 4 New 100% 540 216 0 216 1-P CR 52 Emory Or IH 69E 0.78 Al 4 New 10096 540 11685 0 1,685 W n 1-Q CR 52 IH 59E 1145'W of IH 69E 0.22 Al 4 420 50% 540 238 46 191 N a 1-11 Loma Alta Rd Leopard St 2057'Sof Leopard St 0.39 Cl 2 0 10096 360 281 0 281 Q F 1-S Loma Alta Rd 2057'Sof leopard St Hearn Rd 0.26 Cl 2 New 100% 360 187 0 0 1-U Callicoatte Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.11 A3 6 520 5G% 720 228 27 200 �W 1-V Callimatte Rd Leopard St Hearn Rd 0.48 A3 6 520 50% 720 1,035 125 910 U = 1-W Callicoatte Rd Hearn Rd 2350'Sof Hearn rd 0.44 A3 6 311 5G% 720 955 69 887 ; V 1-% Callmoatte Rd 2350'Sof Hearn rd 4060'Sof Hearn Rd 0.33 A3 6 311 50% 720 713 51 662 J L 1-Y Wright Moavek R Northwest Blvd 1675'S of Northwest Blvd 0.32 A2 4 63 100% 720 922 20 901 W F Z 1-2 Wright Moravek R 1675'S of Northwest Blvd 2245'S of Northwest Blvd 0.10 A2 4 63 10096 720 288 6 282 d (� 1-AA Lake Athens Ave W River Or 2190'W of W River Dr 0.41 CI 2 New 100% 360 295 0 295 0LLJ 1-AB Lake Athens Ave 2190'W of W River Dr Wright Moravek Rd 0.40 Cl 2 New 100% 360 288 0 288 r U 0 1-AC La ke Ath ens Ave 1975'W of Wright Movarek Rd Wright M.-I,Rd 0.36 CI 2 New 100% 360 259 0 259 LL w 1-AD Riverside Blvd 347'Sof River Rock Dr City Limits 0.26 Cl 2 New 100% 360 187 0 187 O d 1A River Trail Or Northwest Blvd 2052'S of Northwest Blvd 0.39 CI 2 New 100% 360 280 0 280 W >- I-AF 1-AF River Trail Dr 2052'S of Northwest Blvd 3650'S of Northwest Blvd D.30 CI 2 New 100% 360 216 0 216 F 1A River Trail Or 3650'S of Northwest Blvd City Limits 0.13 CI 2 New 100% 360 94 0 94 = V 1-AH Amanda Lane Wright Moravek Rd 2115'E of Wright Movarek Rd D.40 A2 4 New 100% 360 576 0 576 1-AI Amanda Lane 2115'E of Wright M-arek Rd 2975'E of Wright Movarek Rd 0.14 A2 4 New 100% 360 208 0 208 N 1-AI East Riverview St Northwest Blvd Lake Athens Ave D.40 CI 2 New 100% 360 288 0 288 LL 1-AK East Riverview St Lake Athens Ave 221'Sof Lake Athens Ave 0.04 Cl 2 New 100% 360 29 0 29 O 1-AL River Hill Dr Northwest Blvd City Limits 0.62 CI 2 New 100% 360 448 0 448 z 1-AM 1-AM CR 69 1400'E of CR 69 0.27 Cl 2 New 100% 360 194 0 194 1-AN 1-AN 1400'E of CR 69 3105'E of CR 69 0.32 CI 2 New 100% 360 230 0 230 1-AQ Wildcat Or 1750'Sof Northwest Blvd City Limits 0.27 Cl 2 New 100% 360 195 0 195 1-AR Emory Dr IH 69E 4230'E of IH 69E 0.82 CI 2 New 100% 360 590 0 590 pp 22,970 6,998 15,785 HS Jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ a� 4Z ORTHWEST - N2(5ERVICE AREA 2)-ECT LIST W - U.. MTP IMP Peak Hour %In Veh-Ml Capacity Pk- Ve MISupply Pk- Veh-Ml Total E.-.Capacity Pk- w s.-Area -1-Numher Roadway Length 3 From To Dealgnatl lane Volume SeMx Hr Per line Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Hr Veh-MI 8 E 2-A Haven Dr New PR Roadway Warrior Dr 0.39 A2 4 648 100% 720 1,112 250 862 2-B Haven Dr Warrior Dr McKm-Rd 0.50 A2 4 648 100% 720 1,440 324 1,116 2-D Calliwatte Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.11 A3 6 520 50% 720 228 27 200 2-E Calliwatte Rd Leopard St Hearn Rd 0.48 A3 6 520 50% ]ZO 1,035 125 910 2-F Calliwatte Rd Hearn Rd 2350'S of Hearn rd 0.44 A3 6 311 50% ]ZO 955 69 88J 2-G Calliwatte Rd 2350'S 0' Hearn rd 4060'S of Hearn Rd 0.33 M 6 311 50% )20 )13 51 662 2-H Mckimie Rd IH-37 Up River Rd 0.0) A2 4 1,300 100% 720 2w 91 111 2-1 Mcki-Rd Up River Rd Creek View Dr 0.18 A2 4 1,300 100% 720 518 234 284 2-1 Mdw,l,Rd Creek View Dr Leopard St 0.30 A2 4 1,205 50% )20 432 181 251 2-K Mdw,le Rd Leopard St Frontier Dr 0.34 A2 4 944 50% J20 490 161 329 N 2-L Mdinaie Rd Frontier Dr Haven Dr 0.42 A2 4 522 50% 720 605 110 495 2-M Mdinaie Rd Haven Dr PRE-W Segmentl 0.50 A3 6 351 50% 720 1,080 88 992 Q _ 2-N Mdm: ie Rd PR E-W Segment l PR E Segmentl 0.50 A3 6 351 50% 720 1,080 88 992 W 2-0 Mcki.i,,Rd PRE-W Segmentl City Limits 0.55 A3 6 351 50% 720 11188 96 1,092 aI ^' 2-P PRE-W Segmentl Violet Rd Widgeon Dr(N-S PR Segment) 0.43 Cl Z New 1W% 360 310 0 310 C 2-q PRE-W Segmentl Widgeam Dr(N-S PR Segment) New PR Segment 0.44 Cl Z New 1W% 360 31J 0 31J 2-R PRE-W Segmentl New PR Segment W.1-1(PR N-SSe-d.t) 0.34 Cl Z New 1W% 360 245 0 245 W 2-5 PRE-W Segmentl Warrior SPR N-S Segment) Mcl(m-Rd 0.60 Cl 2 New 100% 360 432 0 432 2-T PR E-W Segmentl City Limits New PR Segment 0.36 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,037 0 1,037 V 2-U PRE-W Segmentl Ni-PR Segment Warrior(PR N Segment) 0.34 A2 4 New 100% )20 9)9 0 9)9 yy 2-V PR Segmentl Warrior SPR N Segment) MCKlnaie Rd 0.)0 A2 4 New 100% )20 2,016 0 2,016 LL J t 2-W Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) Yellow Oak Ave(Constructed Section) Starlit,,Ln SPR E Segment) O.D3 CI 2 New 100% 360 22 0 22 W,^ = F z 2-X YeIIOw Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) Starlit,,W(PR E-W Segment) City Limits 0.31 CI 2 New 100% 360 223 0 223 v/ W W 2-Y PR N-S Segment 1 5[arlite W(PR E-W Segment) PR E Segment3 0.31 CI 2 New 100% 360 223 0 223 O 2-Z PRN-S Segmentl PRE-W Segment3 City Limits O.D5 CI 2 New 100% 360 36 0 0 N V O 2-AA Widgeon D,CPR Widgeon D,(Const-dSegment) PRE-W Segmentl O.D5 CI 2 New 100% 360 36 0 36 LL w 2-AB Widgeon D,(PR Segment) PRE-W Segmentl Liity Limits 0.2] Cl Z New 1W% 360 194 0 194 ,^ 0 d 2-AE Sunny Dr(PR Segment) PR E-W Segment 1 PR E Segment 2 D.33 CI 2 New 100% 36D 238 0 238 W } 2-AF Hearn Rd(PR Segment) 100'E Dunstain St Woodland Creek Dr D.32 CI 2 New 100% 36D 230 0 230 L F 2-AG Starlit,,L.(PR Segment) Calliwatte Rd Yellow Oak A-(PRN-S Segment D.41 CI 2 New 100% 36D 295 0 295 V 2-AH Starlit,,L.(PR Segment) Yellow OakA (PRN-5Segm,,nt) Proposed N-SS,,gment D.41 cl 2 New 1110% 360 338 0 338 2-AI 5tarlite Ln(PR Segment) Proposed N-S.-dnt -let Rd 0.24 Cl 2 New 1110% 360 1J3 0 173 2-AI Warrior(PR Segment) Haven Dr PRE-W Segmentl 0.25 Cl 2 New 1110% 360 180 0 180 rN 2-AK Warrior(PR Segment) PRE-W Segmentl PRE-W Segmentl 0.36 Cl 2 New 100% 360 259 0 259 O 2-AL Yellow Oak Ave(PR Segment) Dunstain Rd 5a oily Hollow Creek Dr 0.62 Cl 2 New 100% 360 448 0 448 3-AM PR E Segment 3 City Limits Proposed N-S Segment 0.20 A2 4 New 100% )2D 5)6 0 5)6 Z 2-AN PIR E-W Segmenta Proposed N Segment Yalet Rd 0.35 Al 4 New 100% )2D 1,008 0 1,008 21,252 Ll- L%322 H. AS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ NORTHWEST 3(SERVICE AREA 3)PROJECT LIST L - Limite MTP MTP %in Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-MISupply Pk- Veh-MITotal Excess Capacity Pk- R' - s Service Area ProjeR Number Roadway Leng[h Peak Hour Volume From To -ignati Lanes Service Per Lane Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Hr Veh-Mi W 3-A Up River Rd,N of IH 37 Rantl Morgan Rd 1425'W of N Clarkwood Rd 0.49 C3 4 207 100% 315 599 99 501 3-9 Rand Morgan Rtl Up River Rtl,140'Nof IH 37 IH 37 0.03 C3 4 991 100% 315 33 26 7 3-C Rand Morgan Rd IH 37 Up River Rd,180'S of IH 37 0.03 A2 4 991 100% 720 99 33 65 8 3-U Rand Morgan Rd Up River Rd,190'Sof IH 37 Leopard St 0.56 A2 4 991 100% 720 1,617 500 1,117 3-E Rand Morgan Rd Leopard St Oregon Td 0.44 A2 4 969 100% 720 1,291 396 995 3-F Rand Morgan Rd Oregon TH 1540'S f MCNorton Rd 0.69 A2 4 329 100% 720 1,997 226 1,761 3-G Rand Morgan Rd 1540'S f MCNorton Rd 3565'S f MCNorton Rd 0.39 A2 4 329 100% 720 1,094 125 970 3-H Rantl Morgan Rd 3565'S of MCNorton Rd 4795'S of MCNorton Rd 0.23 A2 4 329 100% 720 662 JS 597 3-I Rand Morgan Rd 4795'Sof MCNorton Rd 2650'Nof Agnes St 0.60 A2 4 329 100% 720 1,J29 19J 1,531 3-J Rand Morgan Rd 2650'Nof Agnes St Agnes St 0.50 A2 4 321 100% 720 1,440 161 1,279 3-K N Clarkwood Rd Leopard St 3260'N Sedwick Rd 0.90 A3 6 70 50% 720 1,729 29 1,700 3-L N Clarkwood Rd 3260'N Sedwick Rd Sedwick Rd 0.62 A3 6 36 50% 720 1,339 11 1,329 M 3-M NClarkwood Rd Sedwick Rd Alpine St 0.51 A3 6 36 50% 720 1,102 9 1,093 3-N NClarkwood Rd Alpine St 1070'Sof Alpine St 0.20 A3 6 36 50% 720 432 4 429 Q _ 3-O SClarkwood Rd Agnes St TX 44 0.25 A3 6 291 100% 720 1,100 74 1,026 W 3-P SClarkwood Rd T- CR36 0.76 A3 6 194 100% 720 3,292 147 3,145 aI 3-Q SClarkwood Rd CR 36 McGloin Rd 0.43 A3 6 194 100% 720 1,973 94 1,799 Q 3-R CR 36 Gaviota St S Clarkwood Rd 0.33 Cl 2 0 100% 360 240 0 240 3-S Mckinzie Rtl Creek View or Leopard St 0.30 A2 4 1,205 50% 720 432 191 251 �Lu 4 3-T Mckinzie Rtl Leopard St Frontier Dr 0.34 A2 4 944 50% 720 490 161 329 U = a 3-U Mckinzie Rd Frontier or Haven or 0.42 A2 4 522 50% 720 605 110 495 \ Ln U Z 3-V Mckinzie Rd Haven or PR E-W Segment 1 0.50 A3 6 351 50% 720 1,090 99 992 3-W Mckinzie Rd PR E Segment 1 PR E Segment 2 0.50 A3 6 351 50% 720 1,090 99 992 W d V m 3-X Mckinzie Rd PRE-W Segment2 City Limits 0.55 A3 6 351 50% 720 1,199 96 1,092 ,^ 3-V Haven or(PR Segment) MCKinzie Rd N PR Roadwayl 1.15 Cl 2 New 100% 360 929 0 929 V/ W C 3-Z N PR Roadwayl Leopard St Haven D,(PR Segment) 0.29 C3 4 New 100% 315 365 0 365 0 7 Z 3-AA N PR Roadwayl Haven D,(PR Segment) Oregon Trail(PR Segment) 0.32 C3 4 New 100% 315 403 0 403 `M V 0 3-A9 N PR Roadwayl Oregon Trall(PR Segment) E PR Roadwayl 0.43 c3 4 New l00% 315 542 0 542 ��,^ LL d 3A N PR Roadwayl E PR Roadwayl E PR Roadway2 0.66 C3 4 New 100% 315 932 0 932 V/ 0 3-AD N PR Roadwayl E PR Roadway2 Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) 0.23 C3 4 New 100% 315 290 0 290 W >- 3-AE N PR Roadwayl Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) Alpine St(PR Segment) 0.65 C3 4 New 100% 315 919 0 919 F 3A Oregon Trail(PR Segment) MCKinzie Rd N PR Roadwayl 1.05 Cl 2 New 100% 360 756 0 J56 3A Oregon Trail(PR Segment) N PR Roadwayl Oregon Trail(Conrtmcted Segment) 0.15 Cl 2 New 100% 360 109 0 109 r 3A E PR Roadway 1 MCKinzie Rd N PR Roadway 1 1.00 A2 4 New 100% 720 2,990 0 21990 3I E PR Roadway2 Rand Morgan Rd N PR Roadway 1 0.50 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,440 0 1,440 3 E PR Roadway2 FM 2292 N Clarkwood Rd 0.72 A2 4 New 100% 720 2,074 0 2,074 Q 3A E PR Roadway3 Roadway Limits N PR Roadway 1 0.42 Cl 2 New 100% 360 302 0 302 Z 3A E PR Roadway3 N PR Roadway 1 FM 2292 0.49 Cl 2 New 100% 360 346 0 346 3A Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) City Limits N PR Roadwayl 0.62 Al 4 New 100% 540 1,339 0 1,339 3-AN Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) IN-S PR Roadway 1 IFM 2292 0.45 Al 4 New 100% 540 972 0 972 3-AO Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) IF 2292 N Clarkwood Rd 0.72 Al 4 New 100% 540 1,555 0 1,555 3A Alpine St(PR Segment) City Limits N PR Roadwayl 0.16 C2 3 New 100% 300 144 0 144 3-AQ Alpine St(PR Segment) N-S PR Roadwayl FM 2292 0.22 C2 3 New 100% 300 200 0 200 3A Alpine St(PR Segment) I FM 2292 INClarkwood Rd 0.75 1 C2 3 New 100% 300 675 0 675 3A 1070'Sof Alpine St ICR44 1 0.47 1 A3 1 6 1 New I 100% 1 720 2,039 0 2,039 45,429 2,908 42,521 HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ - CC AIRPORT 1(SERVICE AREA 4(PROJECT LIST R' limits MTP MTP Peak Hour %in Veh-Mi Capacity Pk- Veh-Mi Supply Pk- Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity Pk- SeMceArea Pro]-Number Roadway Length(1,mI.( �W Fmm To Designed Lanes Volume Service Hr Per lane Hr Tate1 Demand Pk-Hr Hr Veh-Mi 4-A Leopard St Co.Products Rd Benys Rd/N Lexington Blvd 0.51 A2 4 651 50% 720 731 165 5% 3 4-13 Leopard St Benys Rd/N Lexington BWd Lantana St 0.51 A2 4 651 50% 720 738 167 4-C Leopard St Lantana St N Padre Island Dr 0.15 A2 4 651 50% 720 213 48 165 4-D Sed-1,Rd NClarkwood Rd Manning Rd 0.79 Al 4 11 100% 540 1,704 9 1,695 4-E Sedwick Rd Manning Rd Rhew Rd 0.39 Al 4 Il 100% 540 837 4 832 4-F Sed-1,Rd Rh-Rd Southern Minerals Rd 0.86 Al 4 11 100% 540 1,860 10 11850 4-G Alpine St NClarkwood Rd Manning Rd 0.79 Cl 2 0 100% 360 567 0 567 4-H Hopkins Rd Railroad Corn Products Rd 0.51 C3 4 81 100% 315 644 41 603 4-I Hopkins Rd Corn Produ Rz Rd N Lexington BWd 1.01 C3 4 63 100% 315 1,269 64 1,205 4-1 NClarkwood Rd Alpine St Sedwick Rd 0.51 C3 2 96 50% 360 183 24 158 4-K NClarkwood Rd Sedwick Rd 810'S of Caroline Rd 0.6Z Cl Z 96 50% 360 ZZ3 3D 193 4-L NClarkwood Rd 870'S of Caroline Rd Leopard St 0.80 Cl 2 96 50% 350 290 39 251 4-M NClarkwood Rd Leopard St IH 37 0.45 CI 2 79 50% 360 164 38 146 Q 4-N N Clarkwood Rd IH 3] Up River Rd 0.21 CI 2 152 50% 350 76 16 60 W 4-0 Up River Rd 970'West of N Clarkwood Rd N Clarkwood Rd 0.18 C3 4 410 SOD% 315 231 75 156 v 4-P Up River Rd N Clarkwood Rd 111W East of N Clarkwood Rd DZl C3 4 410 lOD% 315 265 H6 179 F 4 4-Q Tulose Rd Up River Rd IH 37 0.24 A2 4 412 IOD% 720 679 97 581 D4-R Tuloso Rd IH 3] Leopard St 0.46 A2 4 115 100% 720 1,333 53 1,2m �W 2 4-S Southern Minerals Rd Up River Rd IH 37 0.49 A2 4 198 100% 720 1,419 97 4-T Southern Minerals Rd IH 37 Leopard St 0.25 A2 4 232 100% 720 713 57 656 \ 0 (� = 4-U Southern Minerals Rd Leopard St Sedwick Rd 0.48 A2 4 55 100% ]20 11380 26 1,354 / (1 J 4-V N Lexington Blvd Leopard St Lantana St 0.63 A2 4 260 100% 720 11801 163 11639 W F Q 4-W N Lexington Blvd Lantana St Hopkins Rd 0.28 A2 4 260 100% 720 802 72 729 4-X Corn Products Rd Leopard St Hopkins Rd 0.92 A2 4 125 100% 720 2,661 116 2,545 v/ 0LLJ 4-y Manning Rd Sedwick Rd Alpine Rd 0.50 A2 4 21 100% 720 1,453 11 1,442 0 4-2 Manning Rd Alpine Rd Railroad 0.55 A2 4 21 100% 720 115M 12 1,582 U` U 0 4-AA Manning Rd Railroad T%-41 0.04 A2 4 Zl 100% ]20 115 1 114 LL 0 d 4-A34 -A3 Rh-Rd Leopard St Sedwirk Rd 0.88 C3 4 D 100% 3150 1,111 } 4-AC Bronco Rd Bronco Rd(End) Alpine St 0.31 C3 4 53 100% 391 391 16 3]4 Q F 4-AD Bronco Rd Alpine St Railroad 0.55 0 4 53 100% 315 693 29 664 a U 4-AE Hau Sohn Rd Agnes St TS-44 0.26 A2 4 23 100% 720 749 6 743 4-AF Hopkins Rd TX-44 Agnes St 0.04 A2 4 Ni- 100% 720 126 0 126 4-AG Alpine St Manning Rd Bronco Rd 0.50 C2 3 New 100% 300 453 0 453 ZE 4A Alpine 51 Bronco Rd Southern Minerals Rd 0.75 C2 3 New 100% 300 677 0 677 U 4-AI Southern Minerals Sedwick Rd Alpine St 0.50 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,454 0 1,454 U 4-Al Southern Minerals Alpine St TX44 0.54 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,569 0 1,569 4-AK Tuloso Dr Leopard St 2568'S of Leopard St 0.70 CI 2 New 100% 360 5D4 0 504 4AL Tulmo Dr/Manning Dr 2568'5 of Leopard St Sedwirk Rd 0.61 Cl 2 New 100% 360 441 0 441 4-AN Rhew Rd Sedwick Rd Bronco Rd 0.23 C3 4 New 100% 315 296 0 296 4-AO N Clarkwood Rd Alpine St 1,080'South of Alpine St 0.20 Cl 2 96 50% 360 72 30 62 pp 32,81 1,563 301918 'zApr 121 HS HS Jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW CC AIRPORT 2(SERVICE AREAS)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP Peak %in Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Pk Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(in mi.) From To Designati Lanes Hour Service Pk-Hr Per Lane Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 5-A FM 665 N Padre Island Dr Jr Beck Dr 0.59 A3 6 688 1 50% 720 1,283 204 1,078 5-B FM 665 Jr Beck Dr Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) 0.13 A3 6 683 50% 720 270 43 227 5-C FM 665 Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) Heinsohn Rd(New Segment) 0.40 A3 6 683 50% 720 863 137 727 5-D FM 665 Hei nsohn Rd(New Segment) Westside New Segment 0.54 A3 6 683 50% 720 1,164 184 980 5-E FM 665 Westside New Segment Saratoga Blvd 0.55 A3 6 683 50% 720 1,178 186 992 5-F Talbert Rd(N-S) Joe Mireur Rd TX-44 0.78 C3 4 0 100% 315 979 0 979 NWN m 5-G Talbert Ln(E-W) Joe Mireur Rd Talbert Ln(N-S) 0.33 C3 4 New 100% 315 410 0 410 Ll. 5-H Talbert Ln(E-W) Talbert Ln(N-S) Heinsohn Rd 0.59 C3 4 New 100% 315 742 0 742 Q P 5-J Bear Ln Hensohn Rd Junior Beck Dr 0.47 Al 4 41 100% 540 1,008 19 989 W w 5-K Bear Ln Junior Beck Dr N Padre Island Dr 0.12 Al 4 391 100% 540 250 45 204 U = 5-M Heinsohn RD TX-44 Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segme 0.24 A2 4 23 100% 720 695 5 690 U T 5-N Heinsohn RD Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segment Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) 0.49 A2 4 23 100% 720 1,407 11 1,396 J 5-0 Heinsohn RD Bates Rd(Proposed Segment) Bear Ln 0.49 A2 4 23 100% 720 1,421 11 1,410 LL F G 5-P Heinsohn RD Bear Ln Proposed roadwaysegment 0.49 Al 4 New 100% 540 1,062 0 1,062 W d U '-' S-Q Heinsohn RD Proposed roadway segment Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) 0.22 Al 4 New 100% 540 479 0 479 U) 0LLJ 5-W Joe Mireur Rd Heinsohn Rd(Proposed Segment) FM 665 0.59 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,688 0 1,688 N U 0 5-X Bates Rd Padre Island Dr Heinsohn Rd 0.53 Cl 2 New 100% 360 382 0 382 U 0 5-y Bates Rd Heinsohn Rd Joe Mireur Rd 0.92 Cl 2 New LL 100% 360 660 0 660 N O a 5-Z New Roadway Segment Heinsohn Rd(Proposed Segment) Jr Beck Dr 0.51 Cl 2 New 100% 360 365 0 365 LL } 5-AA New Roadway Segment Jr Beck Dr Padre Island Dr 0.41 Cl 2 New 100% 360 297 0 297 O F 15,941 846 15,095 NaN V Ll. a U U11,121 HS HS Jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ - WESTSIDE I(SERVICE AREA 6)PROJECT LIST a Z - Limits MTP %in W o Peak Hour Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity w Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(mi) Designation MTP Lanes Service 3 From To Volume Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi (Existing) Area �� 8 E 6-A Leopard Street Berrys Rd Lantana Rd 0.51 A2 4 684 50% 720 734 175 560 6-B Leopard Street Lantana Rd SH 358 0.14 A2 4 684 50% 720 202 48 154 6-C Up River Rd Dunn Meanyrd Lantana Rd 0.23 C3 4 234 50% 315 145 27 118 6-D Up River Rd Lantana Rd McBride Ln 0.64 C3 4 269 50% 315 403 86 317 6-E Up River Rd McBride Ln Kansas City Southern R,il,,yT,2 0.21 C3 4 281 50% 315 132 30 103 6-F Up River Rd Kansas City Southern Railway Track N Navigation Blvd 0.15 C3 4 1 281 50% 315 95 1 1 73 6-G Up River Rd 1-37 Leopard St 0.7 C3 4 505 100% 315 882 353 529 6-H Up River Rd Leopard St Old Robstown Rd 0.24 C3 4 306 1 100% 315 302 74 229 - 6-1 Up River Rd Old Robstown Rd Palm Dr 0.58 C3 4 388 100% 315 731 225 506 6-1 Lipan St Palm Dr N Port Ave 0.25 C3 4 287 100% 315 315 72 243 6-K Lip-St N Port Ave N 19th St 0.27 C3 4 298 100% 315 340 80 260 Q 6-L Lipan St N 19th St TX 286 0.21 C3 4 298 100% 315 265 63 202 W 6-M Horne Rd TX 286 Greenwood Dr 0.71 Al 4 1084 100% 540 1,534 770 764 F 6-N Horne Rd Airport Rd Angela Dr 0.53 Al 4 1037 100% 540 1,145 549 595 Q Ln Q 6-0 Horne Rd Angela Dr Old Brownsville Rd 0.3 Al 4 501 100% 540 648 150 498 W Ln 6-P IS Navigation Blvd Old Br.wnsvillw Rd Bear Ln 0.2 Al 4 1 532 100% 540 432 1 106 326 = F w V 6-0. S Navigation Blvd Bear Ln N Green Tree Dr 0.29 Al 4 536 100% 540 626 155 471 V (n 6-R S Navigation Blvd N Green Tree Dr 2917'N of Bear Ln 0.2 Al 4 386 100% 540 432 77 355 6-S S Navigation Blvd 2917'N of Bear Ln Santa Elena St 0.49 Al 4 386 100% 540 1,058 189 869 6-T S Navigation Blvd Santa Elena St Agnes St 0.5 Al 4 484 100% 540 1,080 242 838 W W 3 6-U S Navigation Blvd Agnes St Leopard St 0.79 Al 4 394 100% 540 1,706 311 1,395 0 6-V Bear Ln TX 358 Flat.Rd 0.44 Al 4 436 100% 540 950 192 759 (.) 0 6-W Bear Ln Flat.Rd Cliff Maus Dr 0.39 Al 4 436 100% 540 842 170 673 LLX 6-X Bear Ln Cliff Maus Dr Navigation Blvd 0.12 Al 4 390 100% 540 259 47 212 W 0 d 6-y Bear LnNavigation Blvd Old Brownsville Rd 0.26 Al 4 162 100% 540 562 42 520 a F 6-Z Santa Elena St Flat.Rd Navigation Blvd 0.52 Cl 2 New 100% 360 374 F U 6-AA Santa Elena St 345'E Centaurus St Omaha Dr Ext 0.06 Cl 2 New 100% 360 43 6-AB Santa Elena St Omaha Dr Ext 233'E.f 45th St 0.22 Cl 2 New 100% 360 158 U) 6-AC Omaha Dr Ext Agnes St Santa Elena St 0.5 Cl 2 New 100% 360 360 LU 6-AD Omaha Dr Ext Santa Elena St Bates Rd Ext 0.49 Cl 2 New 100% 360 353 6-AE Bates Rd Ext Flat.Rd Navigation Blvd 0.51 Cl 2 New 100% 360 367 6-AF Bates Rd lNavigation Blvd Omaha Dr Ext 0.31 Cl 2 New 100% 360 223 6-AG Bates Rd Ext Omaha Dr Ext Old Brownsville Rd 0.42 Cl 2 New 100% 360 302 6-AH Omaha Dr Ext Navigation Blvd 1EX Omaha Dr End 1 0.34 Cl 2 New 100% 360 245 18,248 4,254 11,567 HS HS Jc 1.0 A3 o � QW WESTSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 7)PROJECT LIST O LU z Limits NJTp ineryI^�r Iw Servire Area Projee[Number Roadway Length(mi) Designation MTPLanes Peak Hour % Siee Veh-Mi Capaeity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Total -111 Capaeity Pk `V From To Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Hr Veh-Mi (Existing) - 7 Saratoga Blvd Old Brownsville Rd CR 37 0.61 Al 4 421 50% 540 659 129 530 11, J-8 Saratoga Blvd CR37 CR 35 0.7 A3 6 421 50% 720 1,512 147 1,365 �I �z 7-C Saratoga Blvd CR35 Calle Las Colonias 0.45 A3 6 421 50% 720 972 95 977 " 7-D Saratoga Blvd Calle Las Colonias 275'West of CII Cuernavaca 0.22 A3 6 421 50% 720 475 46 429 �� 8 7-E Saratoga Blvd 275'West of Cil Cuernavaca CII Cuernavaca 0.05 A3 6 421 100% 720 216 21 195 7-F Saratoga Blvd CII Cuernavaca Greenwood Dr 0.29 A3 6 421 100% 720 1,210 119 1,092 7-G Saratoga Blvd Greenwood Dr New Road(North of Saratoga) 0.35 A3 6 421 100% 720 1,512 147 1,365 7-H Saratoga Blvd New Road(North of Saratoga) TX 296 0.42 A3 6 421 100% 720 1,914 177 1,639 7-1 Holly Rd Los Robles St Greenwood Dr 0.21 A2 4 169 100% 720 605 36 569 7-J Holly Rd Greenwood Dr Martin St 0.5 A2 4 349 100% 720 1,440 175 1,265 7-K Holly Rd Martin St TX 296 0.29 A2 4 349 100% 720 906 99 709 7-L Old Brownsville Rd SH 359 159'N of Jr Beck Dr 0.6 A3 6 699 50% 720 1,296 207 1,099 7-M Old Brownsville Rd 159'N of Jr Beck Dr HOII,Rd Extension 0.12 A3 6 699 50% 720 259 41 219 7-N Old Brownsville Rd HOII,Rd Extension New Road EW 2 0.4 A3 6 693 50% 720 964 137 727 r 7-0 Old Brownsville Rd New Road EW 2 New Road EWl 0.54 A3 6 693 50% 720 1,166 195 992 _ 7-P Old Brownsville Rd New Road EW 1 Saratoga Blvd 0.55 A3 6 693 50% 720 1,199 199 1,000 7-Q Greenwood Dr Saratoga Blvd New-d(S of Saratoga) 0.5 A2 4 NO Counts 100% 720 1,440 WN 7-R Greenwood Dr New-d(S of Saratoga) 2250'Sof New Road(Sof Saratoga) 0.43 C3 4 N.C.-t, 100% 315 542 - - X F 7-S Sliverberry Dr Extension Sliverberry Dr Greenwood Dr 0.54 Cl 2 New 100% 360 399 - - Q Ln a7-T Martin St Extension Holly Rtl Crosstown Exp, D.SJ Cl 2 New 100% 360 410 - - 7-D Martin St Extension 136'S of Secretariat St New Road EW 3 0.03 Cl 2 New 100% 360 22 - - ALU _ - 7-V Lands Rd Extension 600'East of Harwick Dr New Road(North of Saratoga) 0.15 Cl 2 New 100% 360 109 �/- - V 7-W Lands Rd Extension New Road(North of Saratoga) Martin St Extension 0.15 Cl 2 New 100% 360 109 7-X Lands Rd Extension Martin Rd Extension Crosstown Exp, 0.29 Cl 2 New 100% 360 202 /yy a U _ 7-V New Road EW 3 Martin Rd Extension Crotow ssn Exp, 0.29 Cl 2 New 100% 360 202 - - LL 7-2 Martin St Lands Rtl Extension New Road EW 3 0.49 Cl 2 New 100% 360 353 - - ,W,n^ X W 3 7-AA New Road(North of Saratoga) Lands Rd Extension Saratoga Blvd 0.25 Cl 2 New 100% 360 190 V/ Q 7 7-A8 New Road(S-1,of Saratoga) Saratoga Blvd Greenwood Dr 0.93 Cl 2 New 100% 360 599 - - V O 7 A Greenwood Dr Extension Greenw000d Dr TX 296 0.49 P1 2 New 100% 360 353 - - NLL W 7 A HOII,Rd Extension Old Brownsville Rd W Point NS 1 0.09 A2 4 New 100% 720 230 W O d 7 A HOII,Rd Extension W Point Rd NS 1 Extension CR 37 0.31 A2 4 New 100% 720 993 7 A HOII,Rd Extension Extension CR 37 Extension CR 35 0.55 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,594 - - ,^ F 7 A HOII,Rd Extension Extension CR 35 8u 1,St 0.6 A2 4 New 100% 720 1,729 - - (� 7 A W Point NS 1 W Point Rd H,1I,Rtl Extension 0.1 C1 2 New 100% 360 72 - - Pi 7A Extension CR 37 Saratoga Blvd New Road EW 1 0.43 Cl 2 New 100% 360 310 - - 7 7-AI Extension CR 37 New Road EW 1 New Road EW 2 0.54 Cl 2 New 100% 360 399 W 7 A Extension CR 37 New Road EW 2 HOII,Rd Extension 0.39 Cl 2 New 100% 360 274 - - 7-AL Extension CR 37 HOII,Rd Extension IW Point Rd 1 .27 Cl 2 New 100% 360 194 7 A New Roatl EW 2 Old Brownsville Rd lExtdd,i.d CR 37 1 0.39 Cl 2 New 100% 360 274 AWE7-AN New Roatl EW 1 Old Brownsville Rd Extension CR 37 0.34 Cl 2 New 100% 360 245 J-AO New Road EW1 Extension CR 37 Extension CR 35 0.69 Cl 2 New 100% 360 490 J-AP Extension CR 35 Saratoga Blvd New Roatl EW 1 0.44 A2 4 New 100% J20 1,267 J-AQ Extension CR 35 New Roatl EW 1 Holly Rtl Extension O.Jl A2 4 New 100% J20 2,045 CR 35 Holly Rd Extension W Point Rtl 0.64 Al 4 New 100% J20 1,943 7-AS calld las Colonias Ext Calle las Colonias Extension CR 3J 0.6 Cl 2 New 100% 360 432 - - p 33,169 1,945 14,D51) HS HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW - DOWNTOWN(SERVICE AREA 8)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP MTP Peak Hour %in Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi Supply Pk- Veh-Mi Total ExcessCapacityPk- ServiceArea Project Number Roadway From Tu Length Designati Lanes Volume Service Per Lane Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Hr Veh-Mi Q 8-A N Port Ave Antelope St IH 37 0.04 Al 4 608 50% 540 43 12 31 LU 8-B N Port Ave IH 37 W Broadway St 0.60 A2 4 264 50% 720 864 79 785 1° 8-C E PortAve W Broadway St Union Pacific/W Broadway St 0.13 A2 4 236 100% 720 387 32 356 Q a 8-D E PortAve Union Pacific/W Broadway St N Tancahua St 0.58 A2 4 147 100% 720 1,674 85 1,589 .2 8-E E PortAve N Tancahua St US 181 0.12 A2 4 147 100% 720 335 17 318 V = F 8-F E PortAve US 181 N Mesquite St 0.03 A2 4 123 100% 720 99 4 95 _ U 3 8-6 Hirsch St N Mesquite St N Chaparral St 0.05 A2 4 123 100% 720 143 6 137 N>N J 8-H Seagull Blvd Burleson St E Walnut St 0.41 Cl 2 77 100% 360 293 31 262 Ll. D F 8-I Seagull Blvd E Walnut St Elm St 0.07 Cl 2 77 100% 360 50 5 44 W d (� 0 8-1 N Staples St W Broadway St N Tancahua St 0.25 Cl 2 New 1LLJ 00% 360 180 0 180 (n 0 8-K N Staples St N Tancahua St US 181 0.06 Cl 2 New 100% 360 43 0 43 U 0 4,113 272 1 3,617 Z LL 0 a O F Z U O 11,121 HS HS jC 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW _ BAYSIDE](SERVICE AREA 9)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway Llmlts Length(mi) MTP Designation MTP Lanes Peak Hour Volume %in Service Area Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Total Ezcess Capacity From To Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Tatal Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi Q) - 9-A McArdle Rd Ayers St Kostoryz Rd 1 C2 3 456 l00% 3D0 900 456 444 a 9-6 McArdle Rd Kostoryz Rd Ca11011 Ln 0.5 C2 3 629 100% 3D0 450 314 136 N F_ 9-C Ayers St Ocean Dr Santa Fe St 0.20 A2 4 456 100% 720 576 91 485 9-D Ayers St Santa Fe ST S Staples St 0.35 A2 4 599 100% 720 1008 209 799 w () 9-E Ayers St 5Staple,5t 5Br0wnlee Blvd 0.12 Al 4 0 100% 540 259 0 259 a 9-F Ayers St S Brownlee Blvd Baldwin BWd 0.50 Al 4 503 10D% 540 1080 251 829 W V G 9-G Kostoryz Rd SStaples St Norton St 0.50 Al 4 1288 10D% 540 1080 644 436 U Z9-H Kostoryz Rd N.—St Brawner Pkwy 0.35 Al 4 935 10D% 540 756 327 429 \ j J 9-1 Doddridge St SAlmeda St SStaples St 0.55 Al 4 1625 10D% 540 1188 894 294 d V 9-1 SStaples St Morgan Ave Elizabeth St 0.10 Al 4 752 10D% 540 216 75 141 W _ 9-K SStaples St Elizabeth St Booty St 0.12 Al 4 948 100% 540 259 114 145 0 7 9-L SStaples St Booty St Ayers St o.15 Al 4 948 l00% 540 324 142 182 V 0 AN 9-M SStaples St Ayers St Louisiana Ave 0.65 Al 4 752 100% 540 1404 489 915 LL d 9-R SAlameda St Doddridge St Carmel Pkwy 0.84 A2 4 1911 100% 72D 2413 1601 812 0 9-S SAlameda St Carmel Pkwy Everhart Rd 0.13 A2 4 2159 10D% 720 374 280 94 W >- 9-T 9-T SAlameda St Everhart Rd Robert Dr 0.15 A2 4 946 50% 720 432 71 361 a F 9-w Everhart Extension Center Dr Sa nta Fe St 0.14 Al 4 New 30D% 540 3112 - - Fn V 13022 5959 6760 } a mor 202a HS HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW 0 BAYSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 1D) r - Limits MTP MTP Peak %in Veh-Mi Capacity Pk Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity a Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(MI) From To Designation Lanes Hour Service Hr Per Lane PkH,Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi LU10-A McArdle Rd Everhart Rd 125ft east of Holmes Dr 0.47 C3 4 1106 100% 315 588 516 72 ~ 10-B Ocean Dr Ennis Joslin Rd 4132fteast of Sand Dollar Blvd 1.77 A2 4 182 100% 720 5,096 321 4,775 10-C McArdle Rd Nile Dr. Rodd Field Rd 0.38 C3 4 479 100% 315 479 182 297 = W F 10-D McArdle Rd Rodd Field Rd Ennis loslin Rd 0.48 C3 4 473 100% 315 6D5 227 378 V V Vl 10-G Airline Rd Ocean Dr Gaines St 0.32 Al 4 1025 100% 540 691 328 363 10-1 Gaines St Rabcrt Or Airline Rd 0.59 Cl 2 235 100% 360 425 138 286 ry a U 7,884 1,713 6,171 W W U O N 0 a W } � F Fn U a mHS HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW SOUTHSIDE 1(SERVICE AREA 11)PROJECT LIST Limits MTP Peak Hour %in Servire Vah-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Ml Total Excess Capacity Service Area Project Number Roadway From To Length(mi)MTP Designation Lanes Volume Area Pk-Hr Par Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-MI 11-A Ayers St SH 358 Civitan Dr 0.38 Al 4 703 100% 540 821 267 554 11-B Ayers St CiAtan Dr Holly Rd 0.37 Al 4 703 100% 540 799 260 539 11-C Tiger Ln Carroll Ln Weber Rd O5 C2 3 510 100% 300 450 255 195 r 11-D Weber Rd SH 358 Tiger Ln 0.24 A2 4 2414 50% 720 346 290 56 11-E Weber Rd Tiger Ln Capri Dr 0.3 A2 4 2467 50% 720 432 370 62 W 11-F Weber Rd Capri Dr Holly Rd 0.19 A2 4 2467 50% 720 274 234 39 X F 11-G Weber Rd Holly Rd Schanen Blvd 0.21 A2 4 2501 50% 720 302 263 40 Q (n H 11-H Weber Rd SrhanenBlvd Wickersham St 0.44 A2 4 2501 50% 720 634 550 83 W 11-1 Weber Rd Wickersham St Capitol Dr 0.16 A2 4 2501 50% 720 230 2D0 30 = F u 11-J Weber Rd Capitol Dr Saratoga Blvd 0.2 A2 4 2106 50% 720 288 211 77 V V (� 11-K Weber Rd Saratoga Blvd Acushnet Dr 0.15 A3 6 2136 50% 720 324 160 164 11-L Weber Rd Aaishret Dr Bratton Rd 0.35 A3 6 2136 50% 720 756 374 382L— ^' 11-M Weber Rd Bratton Rd Aaron Dr 0.25 A3 6 1410 50% 720 540 176 364 WW 11-N Weber Rd Aaron Dr Yorktown Blvd 0.27 A3 6 1410 50% 720 583 190 393 (n 0 11-0 Weber Rd Yorktown Blvd Oso Creek 0.38 A3 6 1626 50% 720 821 3D9 512 V 0 N 11-Q Carrel Ln W Wickersham St(PH Segment) Masterson Dr 0.3 Cl 2 New 100% 360 216 0 216 LL 11-T Allencrest Dr(PR Segment) Carmago Dr Saratoga Blvd 0.25 C1 2 New 100% 360 180 D 180 W 0 d 11-U Norchester Or Glenway St Saratoga Blvd 0.26 Cl 2 Ni— 100% 360 187 D 187 Q >- 11-V Wickersham St Carroll Ln W Carroll Ln E 0.04 Cl 2 New 100% 360 29 D 29 Fn 11-W Wickersham St Carroll LnE Norchester Dr 0.12 Cl 2 New 100% 360 85 D 86 = V 11-X Kram St Bratton Rd Weber Rd 0.35 Cl 2 New 100% 360 252 D 252 11-Y Kostoryz Rd(PR Segment) Saratoga Blvd Br—na Rd 1.06 A3 6 New 100% 720 4,579 D 4,579 11-2 Kostoryz Rd(PR Segment) B—ira Rd Webber Rd 0.22 A3 6 Ni,. 100% 720 950 D 950 O 14,080 4,110 91969 or 202a AS AS Jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW SOUTHSIDE 2(SERVICE AREA 12)PROJECT LIST j y g[ (mi) gna[ion Peak Hour Volume Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Demand Excess Capacity Service Area-j-Number Roadwa From To Len h MTPDesi MTPLaees Yln Service Area Hr T..Ir Pk-HrTotal' Pk-Hr Veh-Mi' 2021 Pk-Hr Per La ee Pk- 12-A Weber Rd SH 358 Tiger Ln 0.25 A2 4 2414 50% 720 360 302 58 12-C Weber Rd Tiger Ln Capri Dr 0.30 A2 4 2467 50% 720 432 370 62 12-D Weber Rd Capri Dr Holly Rd 0.19 A2 4 2467 50% 720 277 237 40 12-E Weber Rd Holly Rd Schaeee Rlvtl 0.21 A2 4 2501 50% 720 303 263 40 12F Weber Rd Schanen Rlvtl Wickersham St OA4 A2 4 2501 50% 720 640 556 80 N 12-6 Weber Rd Wickersham St Capitol Dr 0.16 A2 4 2106 50% 720 230 168 62 12-H Weber Rd Capitol Dr Saratoga Rlvtl 0.20 A2 4 2106 50% 720 281 206 76 12-I Weber Rd Saratoga Rlvtl Acushnet Dr 0.15 A3 6 2136 50% 720 329 163 166 121 Weber Rd Acushnet Dr Bratton Rd 0.35 A3 6 2136 50% 720 753 372 380 W 12-N Weber Rtl Bratton Rtl Aaron Dr 0.25 A3 6 1410 50% 720 537 175 362 F 12-L Weber Rtl Aaron Dr Yorktown Rlvtl 0.27 A3 6 1410 50% 720 594 194 400 Ln12-N Yorktown Rlvtl Weber Rd Sun Valley Dr 0.33 A3 6 0 50% 720 723 0 723 < 12-0 Yorktown Rlvtl Sun Valley Dr Oso Pkwy 0.74 A3 6 1546 50% 720 1,599 572 1,027 W = F .2 12-P YorktownBlvtl Oso Pkwy Everhart Rtl 0.45 A3 6 1355 50% 720 978 307 671 U U 12-Q Yorktown Rlvtl Everhart Rd Lipes Rlvtl 0.41 A3 6 1591 50% 720 896 330 566 \ J 12-R Yorktown Rlvtl Lipes Rlvtl S Staples St 0.59 A3 6 1514 50% 720 1,274 447 828 = F _ —12 S Yorktown Rlvtl SStaples St Loire Rlvtl 0.45 A3 6 1588 50% 720 981 361 620 121 Yorktown Rlvtl Loire Rlvtl Cimarron Rlvtl 0.55 A3 6 2032 50% 720 1,188 559 629 W W EDU r, 12-U Everhart Rd Woolridge Rd Congressional Dr 0.29 Al 4 1886 100% 540 620 541 79 0 121 Everhart Rtl Congressional Dr Saratoga Rlvtl 0.35 Al 4 1886 100% 540 762 666 97 N U 0 121C SStaples St Saratoga Rlvtl Timbergate Dr 0.50 A3 6 2765 100% 720 2,178 1,394 784 121D SStaples St Timbergate Dr Lipes Rlvtl 0.50 A3 6 2188 100% 720 2,163 1,096 1,067 W 0 d 121E S Staples St Lipes Rlvtl Yorktown Rlvtl 0.50 A3 6 1744 100% 720 2,163 874 1,290 121F Lipes Rlvtl SStaples St 6iegerberry Dr 0.27 C3 40 100% 315 343 0 343 F 12-A6 Lipes Rlvtl 6iegerberry Dr Spanish Wootl Dr 0.12 C3 4 0 100% 315 150 0 150 U,^) 121H Lipes Rlvtl Spanish Wootl Dr Rrockhampton St 0.36 C3 4 0 100% 315 458 0 458 V/ U 12-AI Lipes Rlvtl Rrockhampton St Cimarron Rlvtl 0.26 C3 4 499 100% 315 324 128 196 12-AJ Patti Dr Commonwealth Dr Timbergate Dr 0.17 Cl 2 New 100% 360 126 0 126 r 12 Ag Simpson D,(PR Segment) Saratoga Rlvtl Denb—.Oak Dr 0.19 Cl 2 New 100% 360 137 0 137 21,798 10,279 11,519 O ,,^ V/ HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW SOUTH SIDE 4(SERVICE AREA 13)PROJECT LIST - Service Area Project Number Roadway Limits Length(mi) MTP MTP Peak Hour %in Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity From To Designation Lanes Volume Service Pk Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 13-A Yorktown Blvd Weber Rd Sun Valley Dr 0.33 A3 6 1546 50% 720 713 255 458 13-B Yorktown Blvd Sun Valley Dr Oso Pkwy 0.74 A3 6 1355 50% 720 1,598 501 1,097 W 13-C Yorktown Blvd Oso Pkwy Everhart Rd 0.45 A3 6 1355 50% 720 972 305 667 �y 13-D Yorktown Blvd Everhart Rd Lipes Blvd 0.41 A3 6 1591 50% 720 886 326 559 Q 13-E Yorktown Blvd Lipes Blvd S Staples St 0.59 A3 6 1591 50% 720 1,274 469 805 LnLn 13-6 Yorktown Blvd S Staples St Loire Blvd 0.45 A3 6 1588 100% 720 1,944 715 1,229 W = F Q 13-H Yorktown Blvd Loire Blvd Cimarron Blvd 0.55 A3 6 1588 100% 720 2,376 874 1,502 U (.)u 13-1 Yorktown Blvd Cimarron Blvd 309'W of W Logan Dr 0.6 A3 6 1445 100% 720 2,592 867 1,725 J 2 13-1 Yorktown Blvd 309'W of Logan Dr Rodd Field Rd 0.39 A3 6 1360 100% 720 1,685 530 1,154 F 13-K Yorktown Blvd Rodd Field Rd Fred,Folly Dr 0.47 A3 6 1276 100% 720 2,030 600 1,431 LU— X LLJ V 13-L Yorktown Blvd Fred,Folly Dr 1274'E of Starry Rd 0.77 A3 6 1276 100% 720 3,326 982 2,344 U) 0 v 13-M Yorktown Blvd 1274'E of Starry Rd Cay.del Oso(Water Feature) 0.36 A3 6 678 100% 720 1,555 244 1,311 V 0 13-Q S Staples St Os.Pkwy 185'E S Os.Pkwy 0.71 A3 6 1248 100% 720 3,048 880 2,168 UL '^ 13-W Road H/Dalmati.n Dr Safety Steel Dr Rodd Field Road 0.20 Cl 2 New 100% 360 144 (J,f 0 d 13-AB Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) PER E-W Segment Os.Pkwy 0.42 A3 6 New 100% 720 1,814 Q F 13-AC Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) Os.Pkwy City Limits 0.47 A3 6 New 100% 720 2,030 13-AF Os.Pkwy V.rkt.wn Blvd Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) 2.00 Pi 2 New 100/ 360 1,440 = V 13-A6 Os.Pkwy Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) Cimarron Blvd 1.15 Pi 2 New 100/ 360 828 3D,257 7,549 16,45D 0 Y) HS jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ SOUTHSIDE 3(SERVICE AREA 14)PROJECT LIST a W Limits MTP MTP Peak Hour %in Service Veh-Mi Ca Veh-Mi Su I Veh-Mi Total Excess Ca Service Area Project Number Roadway Length paciTy pp y pacify �� 8 From To Designation Lanes Volume Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total DemandrJ Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 14-D Pau l Jones Ave SH 358 1540-S of SH 358 0.29 C3 4 100% 315 368 0 368 14-E Pau lJones Ave 154D'S of SH 358 Holly Rd 0.50 C3 4 100% 315 627 0 627 14-F Holly Rd Rodd Field Rd Lexington Rd 0.50 Al 4 287 100% 540 1,082 144 938 14-G Holly Rd Lexington Rd Ennis Joslin Rd 0.28 A3 6 287 100% 720 1,228 82 1,147 14-H Holly Rd Ennis Joslin Rd PaulJones Ave 0.47 A2 4 287 100% 720 11361 136 1,226 14-J Woolridge Rd Rodd Field Rd Victoria Park Dr 0.63 A2 4 638 100% 720 1,817 403 1,414 - 14-K Woolridge Rd Victoria Park Dr Ennis Joslin Rd 0.15 A2 4 638 100% 720 438 97 341 14-L Lipes Blvd Cimarron Blvd Bronx Or 0.39 C3 4 275 100% 315 497 108 389 r _ 14-M Lipes Blvd Bronx Dr Airline Rd 0.31 C3 4 275 10D% 315 392 86 307 a 14-N Yorktown Blvd Rodd Field Rd Frees Folly Dr 0.47 A3 6 971 100% 720 2,042 459 1,583 rWN 14-0 Yorktown Blvd Freds Folly Or 1274'E of Starry Rd 0.77 A3 5 971 100% 720 3,330 749 2,581 14-P Yorktown Blvd 1274'E of Starry Rd Cayo del Oso(Water Feature] 0.36 A3 5 971 100% 720 1,551 349 1,203 Q Ln 14-Q Airline Rd SH 358 Williams Dr 0.28 A3 5 2658 50% 720 595 366 229 W OC 14-R Airline Rd Williams Dr Holly Rd 0.55 A3 5 2658 50% 720 11198 737 461 V V 14-5 Airline Rd Holly Rd Cimarron Blvd 0.39 A3 6 2658 50% 720 851 523 327 J 14-T Airline Rd Cimarron Blvd Woolridge Rd 0.17 A3 6 2658 100% 720 752 463 289 14-Z Saratoga Blvd Cimarron Blvd Airline Rd 0.38 A3 5 1601 100% 720 1,642 608 1,033 W d V 14-AA Saratoga Blvd Airline Rd Rodd Field Rd 0.63 A3 5 1601 100% 720 2,722 11009 1,713 0Lu 14-AB Yorktown Blvd Cimarron Blvd 309'W of Bichon Or 0.6 A3 5 1445 50% 720 1,296 433 863 V O 14 AC Yorktown Blvd 309'W of W Logan Dr Rodd Field Rd 0.39 A3 6 1360 50% 720 842 265 577 M LL 14-AD Williams Dr Rodd Field Or Lexington Rd 0.51 C3 4 New 100% 315 643 0 643 W O d 14-AE Williams Dr Lexington Rd Ennis Joslin Rd 0.28 C3 4 New 100% 315 353 0 353 Q >- 14-AG 14-AG Oso Parkway Country Road 26A Country Road 26 0.52 Pi 2 New 100% 360 374 0 374 14-AH Oso Parkway Country Road 26 Yorktown Blvd 0.66 Pi 2 New 100% 360 475 0 475 = V 14-AI Freds Folly Or Las Bahias Dr Yorktown Blvd 0.28 Cl 2 New 100% 360 202 0 202 14 AJ Country Rd 26 330'E of Pennine Way Oso Pakway(Proposed Section) 0.18 Cl 2 New 10D% 360 130 0 130 14-AL Country Rd 26A Country Rd 71,Cir Oso Pakrway(Proposed Section) 0.34 CI 2 New 100% 360 245 0 245 O 27,053 7,016 20,037 U) His His Jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW LONDON(SERVICE AREA 15)PROJECT LIST LimitsMTP MTP Peak %in Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Veh-MiTotal Excess Capacity Service Area Project Number Roadway Length(mi) From To Designation Lanes Hour Service Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-HTota I Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 15-A S Oso Pkwy(PR SegmE Deer Park Rd 20A(PR Segment) 0.6 Pi 2 New 100% 360 432 15-B S Oso Pkwy(PR SegME 20A(PR Segment) City Limits 0.3 PS 2 New 100% 360 216 ff 15-C 20A(PR Segment) City Limits S Oso Pkwy(PR Segment) 0.25 C3 4 New 100% 315 315 _ 15-D CR 41 CR 20A 315'S of Mars Hill Dr 0.5 C3 4 No Counts 50% 315 315 15-E CR 41 315'S of Mars Hill Dr SStaples St 0.5 C3 4 No Counts 50% 315 315 L() 15-F CR 41 SStaples St Kitty Hawk Dr Segment) 0.5 A2 4 No Counts 50% 720 720 r F 15-G CR 41 Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Segment)City Limits 0.5 A2 4 No Counts 100% 720 1,440 Q 15-H N-S Segment 1 Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Segment)City Limits 0.63 C3 4 New 100% 315 794 - - LU _ .2 15-1 E PR Segment 1 CR 41 N Segment 1 0.48 Cl 2 New 100% 360 346 - - U 15-J E PR Segment 1 N Segment 1 S Oso Pkwy 0.45 Cl 2 New 100% 360 324 - - Q y J 15-K Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Segi CR 41 N Segment 1 0.23 C3 4 New 100% 315 290 W 7 F 15-L Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Seg N-S Segment 1 Kitty Hawk Dr 0.12 Cl 2 New 100% 360 86 V W 15-M S Oso Pkwy(PR Segm City Limits City Limits 0.7 Pl 2 New 100% 360 504 > Q 15-S E PR Segment Lady Alexa Dr City Limits 0.52 C3 4 New 100% 315 655 V 0 15-U CR 33 CR 43 Lady Claudia St 0.38 C3 4 No Counts 50% 315 239 - - W LL d 15-V CR 33 Lady Claudia St City Limits 0.75 C3 4 No Counts 50% 315 473 - - 15-W Lady Claudia St Lady Alexa Dr N Segment 0.52 C3 4 No Counts 100% 315 655 - - z F 15-X Lady Claudia St N Segment CR 33 0.2 C3 4 No Counts 100% 315 252 - - O 7,464 0 0 Q Z O J AS AS Jc 1.0 `a3 o � W ? OZ aW FLOUR BLUFF 1(SERVICE AREA 16)PROJECT LIST Q Service Area Project Number Roadway Limits Length MTP MTP Peak in Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Supply Pk Veh-Mi Total Excess W From To Designation Lanes Hour Service Pk-Hr Per Lane Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Capacity Pk 16-C NAS Dr Roadway Limits Webb St 0.70 A3 6 1,507 100% 720 3,024 1,055 1,969 16-E Waldron Rd Webb St Claride St 0.07 A2 4 588 100/ 720 202 41 160 W y 16-F Waldron Rd Claride St John F Kennedy Memorial Causeway 0.30 A2 4 611 100% 720 864 183 681 w 16-G Waldron Rd John F Kennedy Memorial Causeway Compton Rd 0.23 A2 4 1,638 100% 720 662 377 286 V = F 16-H Waldron Rd Compton Rd Graham Rd 0.26 A2 4 1,870 100% 720 749 486 263 > V (n 16-1 Waldron Rd Gmham Rd Don Patricio Rd 0.50 A2 4 1,756 100% 720 1,440 878 562 (n J 16-J Waldron Rd Don Patricio Rd Stardust Ln(PR Segment) 0.25 A2 4 1,370 100% 720 720 343 377 LU d V 16-K Waldron Rd Stardust Ln(PR Segment) Purdue Rd 0.25 A2 4 1,370 100% 720 720 343 377 I,'n W 16-L Waldron Rd Purdue Rd Hustlin Hornet Dr 0.06 A2 4 1,370 50% 720 86 41 45 O 16-M Division Rd Coastline Flour Bluff Dr 0.72 A2 4 0 50% 1 720 1,037 0 1,037 r V O 9,5D4 3,746 4,721 LL LL d LL O � F J m U 01J LL HS jc 1.o A3 o � W ? OZ aW FLOUR BLUFF 2(SERVICE AREA 1])PROJECT LIST Limps MTP MTP Peak %in Service Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-MiSupply Pk Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity Service Area Project Number Roadway From To Length Designati Lanes Hour Area Pk-Hr Per Lane Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 1]-A Yorktown Blvd Laguna Shores Rd Waldron Rd 0.88 C2 3 392 100% 300 790 345 446 1]-B Yorktown Blvd Waldron Rd Flour Bluff Dr 1.00 A2 4 555 100% 720 2,891 557 2,334 Q 1]-C Yorktown Blvd Flour Bluff Dr Scarlet Oak Dr 0.50 A2 4 555 100% 720 1,452 280 1,172 W 1]-D Yorktown Blvd Scarlet Oak Dr Berlet Ln 0.25 A2 4 555 100% 720 730 141 590 1]-E Yorktown Blvd Berlet Ln Roscher Rd 0.25 A2 4 803 100% 720 ]1] 200 517 F 1]-F Yorktown Blvd Roscher Rd 1894 ftwest of Roscher Rd 0.36 A2 4 803 100% 720 1,033 288 745 W In 1]-G Waldron Rd Hustlin Hornet Dr Glenoak Dr 0.44 A2 4 1,255 100% 720 1,256 547 709 1]-H Waldron Rd Glenoak Dr Caribbean Dr 0.50 A2 4 1,057 100% 720 1,442 529 913 F 4 1]-I Waldron Rd Caribbean Dr Mediterranean Dr 0.33 Al 1 4 500 100% 540 712 165 547 > V U) 1]-J Waldron Rd Mediterranean Dr Yorktown Blvd 0.68 Al 4 367 100% 540 1,460 248 1,212 (� J 1]-L Flour Bluff Dr Division Rd Purdue Rd 0.25 Al 4 1,403 100% 540 540 351 189 W F '= 1]-M Flour Bluff Dr Purdue Rd GI.—I,D, 0.50 Al 4 1,078 100% 540 1,073 536 537 in w (� 1]-N Flour Bluff Dr GI.—I,D, Caribbean Dr 0.50 Al 4 589 100% 540 1,089 297 792 v� O 1]-O Flour Bluff Dr Caribbean Dr Ramfield Rd 0.50 Al 4 460 100% 540 1,084 231 853 N V O 1]-P Flour Bluff Dr Ramfield Rd Yorktown Blvd 0.50 Al 4 460 100% 540 1,0]] 229 848 u 1]-Q Roscher Rd(PR Segment) Roscher Rd(Constructed Segment) GI.—I,D, 0.05 Cl 2 New 100% 360 36 0 36 LL 0 Il 1]-R Purdue Rd(PR Segment) Flour Bluff Dr Glenoak Dr 0.85 Cl 2 New 100% 360 612 0 612 = - 1]-S Purdue Rd(PR Segment) Glenoak Dr Caribbean Dr 0.50 Cl 2 New 1002 360 360 0 360 J 1]-T Golden Oak Dr(PR Segment) Caribbean Dr Ramfield Rd 0.53 Cl 2 New 100% 360 382 0 382 V 1]-V Scarl et Oak Dr(PRSegment) Yorktown Blvd I Flour Bluff Dr 0.70 Cl 1 2 New 100% 1 360 504 0 504 1]-W Scarlet Oak D,(PRSegment) J Flour Bluff Dr Yorktown Blvd 0.70 1 Cl 1 2 1 New I % 360 504 0 504 1]-X Glenoak Dr(PR Segment) Glenoak Dr(Constructed Segment)J Roscher Rd 0.25 Cl 2 New 100% 1 360 180 0 180 19,924 4,903 14,981 O J LL H. HS Jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW PADRE ISLAND 1(SERVICE AREA 18)PROJECT LIST Service Area Project Number Roadway Limhs Length MTP MTP peak Hour Volume bin Veh-Mi Capachy Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi Total Excess Capachy From Ta Designati Lanes Service Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-Hr Total Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 18-A TX 361 Beach Access Rd 2 Sea Way Dr 0.78 RA3 4 938 50% 788 1,223 364 859 18-B TX 361 Sea Way Dr 1043'N of La Concha Blvd 0.43 RA3 4 938 50% 788 6]] 202 476 18-C TX 361 1043'N of La Concha Blvd 1053'S of Beach View Dr 0.54 RA3 4 938 50% 788 844 251 593 18-D TX 361 1053'S of Beach View Dr 1350'N of Beach View Dr 0.45 RA3 4 938 50% 788 714 212 501 18-E TX 361 1350'N of Beach View Dr Seacomber Dr 0.23 RA3 4 938 50% 788 365 109 257 18-F TX 361 Seacomber Dr 462'N of Porto Village,Dr 0.28 RA3 4 938 100% 788 878 261 617 LU 18-G TX 361 462'N of Porto Village.Dr 1283'N of Mustang Island Estate 0.46 RA3 4 938 100% 788 1,444 430 1,014 18-H TX 361 1283'N of Mustang Island Estates Di 211'N of Mariner's Dr 0.51 RA3 4 938 100% 788 1,616 481 1,135 Q 18-1 460'S of Bikini Dr Access Road 2 0.58 Cl 2 New 100% 360 419 0 419 F 18-1 Access Rd No 2 Sea Way Dr(Proposed Segment) 0.79 Cl 2 New 100% 360 566 0 566 W In m 18-K Sea Way Dr(Proposed Segment) 1-C 0.44 Cl 2 New 100% 360 314 0 314 18-L 1-C 1-E 0.54 Cl 2 New 100% 360 391 0 391 V = 18-M 1-E Seacomber Dr 0.67 C1 2 New 100% 360 484 0 484 U In 18-N Seacomber Dr 1-G 0.29 Cl 2 New 100% 360 207 0 207 18-0 1-G 1-1 0.46 C1 2 New 100% 360 331 0 331 W,^ D F 18-P 1-1 City Limits 0.51 Cl 2 Nv/ ew 100% 360 368 0 368 d V 18-Q TX 361 1-A 0.24 C1 2 New 100% 360 170 0 170 0LLJ 18-R Coastline TX 361 0.33 Cl 2 New 100% 360 239 0 239 r U 0 n 18-5 TX 361 1-B 0.23 Cl 2 New 100% 360 166 0 166 Q LL 18-T Coastline TX 361 0.33 Cl 2 New 100% 360 239 0 239 z O d 18-0 TX 361 1-D 0.16 Cl 2 New 100% 360 117 0 117 } 18-V TX 361 Coastline 0.34 Cl 2 New 100% 360 248 0 248 F 18-W l Concha Blvd Coastline 0.17 Cl 2 NJew 100% 360 122 0 122 —1 U 18-X 1-F TX 361 0.16 Cl 2 New 100% 360 113 0 113 v, 18-y 1-H TX 361 0.15 Cl 2 New 100% 360 110 0 110 W 18-2 1-1 TX 361 0.15 Cl 2 New 100% 360 108 0 108 �y 18-AA TX 361 Coastline 0.35 Cl 2 New 100% 360 255 0 255 Q 18-AB JTX 361 17oastim. 0.36 Cl 2 New 100% 360 260 0 260 12,367 2,311 10,056 a HS HS ic 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW rn a W ap PADRE ISLAND 2(SERVICE AREA 19(PROTECT LIST WD Li mils MFP MTP 1.in Veh-Mi Capacity Pk Veh-Mi Supply Veh-Mi T 1 Exress Capacity Pk Service Area Pl.i-Numhec Roatlway Length(inmi.( Peak Houc Volume 2 From To Designa[i Lanes Service H,Pec Lane Pk-HC To[al Demantl Pk-Hc HC Veh-Mi V Patice Islantl 2(Service Area 19( 119A 1TX 361 1 Gulf Beach Access Roatl 3 Beach Access Rd 2 4.66 RA3 4 938 100% 788 14,676 4,369 10,307 J 14,676 4,369 10,30) W D F W W N U O LLW Z O a J � (n U W a aHS HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW 0 N a W PADRE ISLAND 3(SERVICE AREA 20)PROJECT LIST k H %i U.. Length n Veh-Mi Capacity Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Total E...apacity Servke Area PrpjM Number Roadway Length(in mi.) MTP MTP PCa F From To —g—, Lanes Volume Service Pk-Hr Per Lane Pk-HrTotal Demand Pk-Hr Pk-HV.h-. W '2 2D-A TX 361 SPadre Is land D, 57V East of S Padre Island Dr 0.11 RA3 4 949 5D% 788 171 51 119 U —LL, 2D-B TX 361 572'East of S Padre Island Dr Zahn Rd D.75 RA3 4 949 51)% 788 1,18. 355 824 20-C iX 361 Zahn Rd Newport Pass Rd 1.D4 RA3 4 949 5D% 788 1,638 493 1,144 > U 2D-D TX 361 Newport Pass Rd Gulf Beach Access Road 3 1.19 RA3 4 949 51)% 788 1,871 Sfi3 1,3.7 2D-E Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Section) Park Rd 22 P-1,Channel Park Rd 1.60 Cl 2 New —% 360 1,152 D 1,152 W n 20-I Park Rd 22 Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Sectio 0.11 Cl 2 New 100% 360 78 D 78 ,V/ IL 20-J Park Rd 22 Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Sectio 0.11 Cl 2 New 100% 3607S D 78 ^ X W 6,168 1,463 4,704 M O 7 U O LL W Z O a J � (n U W a aHS HS jc 1.0 A3 o � W ? OZ aW N a W PADRE ISLAND 4(SERVICE AREA 21)PROJECT LIST a F Service Area ProjeR Number Roadway Limits Length(in mi.) MTP Peak Hour Volume %in Veh-Mi Capacity Pk Veh-Mi Supply Pk Veh-Mi Total Excess Capacity W In From To Designati Service Hr Per Lane HrTotal Demand Pk-Hr Pk-Hr Veh-Mi 'z 21-A Sea Pines Dr(Proposed Segment) Sea Pines Dr 2,326 ft North of Sea Pines Dr D.44 C2 New 100% 300 396 0 396 = 21-B Palmira Ave(Proposed Segment) White Cap Blvd 1,D79 ft South of White Cap Blvd D.2D Cl New 100% 36D 147 D 147 > 0 21-C Coral Vines St(Proposed Segment) Sea Pines Dr All amanda Dr D.3D C2 100% 300 27D D 27D 21-E Palmira Ave 1,D79 ft South of White Cap Blvd Access Rd D.2D Cl 100% 36D 146 D 146 W,^ D F 21-F Access Rd 6 5D4'N of Access Rd 6 DAD Cl New 100% 36D 69 D 69 v/ d (� 21-G Palmira Ave Park Rd 22 DAD Cl New 100% 36D 72 D 72 0LU 21-H Palmira Ave(Proposed Segment) Sea Pines Dr Park Rd 22 D.37 Cl New 100% 36D 266 D 266 V O 971 ll 971 oLL a Z O a J � (n U W a aHS HS jc 1.0 A3 APPENDIX D Service Area Exhibits Service Area Location Map s 1 � 2 3 4 6 6 5 7 9 18 11 10 U5 12 14 16 19 � 1 13 17 20 i 21 6 z 1 i s C 1 ax, x� � 1 1 y 3 �a r m 9 g Pt 1-F 1-G A 1 1 1 I 1 J ' 1-K- 1 1-M -N1-T _ 1-Y 1_AB L_1-AE e 1-A --- 1 U / — - — �, 1 R t 1-AJ 1 B 1-D 1-AM 1-ACI - -"-- y �� 1 � �1-AL <fk�rc 1-AN — -- AO 1_S 1-Z 1_AF _ ---, — �1 V Iz(off 1 E 11-AA ---- "1-AK .1-AD — 1-AH - -� / 1-AG t1-AI 1 Q � e 1_W_r M \ � 1-0 % --------------- — Legend samba AUaa 1 -Widaning Projaats Samica AUaa2 ---•Na 111J.'s comas Ch,sa any omits Non lmpac[Fee 6Yudy r �' Eligible TM,spoTaoon Plan a - B,,dP,jaQ 0 1,500 3,000 I't.'sa(.i"lmp"vamants FEET NORTHWEST 1 (SERVICE AREA 1) � PAPE-DAWSONA2023 �ENGINEERS oaAw CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY R,NNPP eRo� TEGAzEN�INEERIN�FIRM,a,o-R RT,ESRR Service Area Location Map s 1 2 1 3 4 8 6 5 0 18 7 11 10 U5 12 16 19 � 14 1 13 Q /.1 17 20 21 E�o x \ r g � o s o E 2D 2-E s O o i 2-AF c ✓� H/ w 2-AG 2 AL �� P 3=-- � � .oma 2_G �� 2_W II �� 3 2-1x� e 2-X �a 2.1 s 2-AH/ 2 Y 2_A1 0 2-AM �\ 2_K. � - a , � 2-AN� 2-L a _l s bow 0 a 2-A 2-B .2-AA 2-Q 2-R 1_2-AJ , - - -- -----`--------r-------�- S 2- M I 2-AE— 2- `2-AB 2-AK_ -'--- - 2_T , - 1 - _ , V 2-N 2 2-O Legend N Service Areal ———— New Projects Service Area 2 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 3 —Bond Project Corpus Christi City Limits o 1,000 2,000 Intersection Improvements Widening Projects EET NORTHWEST 2 (SERVICE AREA 2) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 ENGINEERS JU CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Ts o�w 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY S07NUPPER u—S rE�EN 1NEER1N�FIRM CHRIST,T RRR31210375900 Service Area Location Map — � 4 8 v ` 6 \ _ - : A _ 11 10 16 19 i I U5 ,2 rte. 1 14 vE A wr13 17 26/ 3-B 21 M\ � 1 L; 3-C p w o n No,�" � 3—U 3—A 9 ---------------------- 3—Y ------- ------- ----3—Y 3—V -„�3—Z \ 3—AF 3—AA 3—E \\ --- -------- ------- w o ep m < w Fm � m 3—W3—ABF 3—K 3—AH �A 3—F "o�o" m , \ 3—AJ 34 ----------- — -- — 3—AC 3—G 3—AK 3—AL 3—L ----------}-- - � 3—H 3—AD—..j' 3—AN 3—AMI f 3—AE 3—I 3—AO I 3—M p 3—AR ` 3—A P — l ------ 3—N 3—AQ 1 3—AS 3-J \ �\ ' � 3—O — 3—P 3—R N Legend S.rn.Area2 -wide1119 PTOJeets .� Service Area3 ----New PTOJeets Service Area4 Nonimpact Fee Study sro�cx � 3—Q Eligible Transportation Plan Service Areas � I 0 1,200 2,000 InterseetI"Improvements O Corpus Christi City Limits FEET NORTHWEST 3 (SERVICE AREA 3) PAPE-DAWSON J.1 2023ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY R,N°° eRop TE�ENGINEERINGFIRMRa,R RTI TRT,ESRR Service Area Location Map s 1 � 2 /�........_ 3 6 6 5 9 18 7 11 10 U5 12 19 14 16 .......-ti....�. 1 13 2 17 0 21 g 4-O � 4-P � 4-N F � 3 $ 4-Q 4-M 0 °>,Ao 4-R ° 4_L � _ � �. L 4-S i — — 4-AK �\v � 4-T__ 4-AL 4-AB 4-K j --- 4-D 4-E 4-F 3 7 4 A 1 , x � � m xpmasxireE 4-AN _ 4-B 4-J 4-Y :4-AI 4-V 4-G 4-AG 4-AH 4-C I 4-X 4-AO 4-AC 4-W 4-Z 4-AJ 4-H 4-I , AOE,� M 4-AA 4-AD — — 4-AF� 4-AE Legend SF,UFAIa3 -wme.mg SF,UFAIa5 N;Illlt1ee swov I= o� seNmeAreae eigmie T_sporcam"via, SF,UFAI 7 / o 1,200 2,400 come cnosn cmiu Itl FEET CC AIRPORT 1 (SERVICE AREA 4) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY R,NNPP eRo� TE ENGINEERING 0 �R RT,ESRR ... ...... o Service Area Location Map 2 3 8 4 6 5 7 9 18 10 0 12 16 19 14 13 17 20 o 21 21 'U, — 5-F 5-H 5-M -----------L- 5-N 5-Y 5-X -——————————————— —————— ——— — ---------1-- 8 -------- 5-0 5-K 5-J 5-P 5-AA 5-Z 5-Q --------- --- 5-A 5-W 5-13 5-C 5-D Legend Service Area 3 Widening Projects Service Area 4 ---- New Projects Service Area 5 Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 6 Bond Project Service Area 7 Intersection Improvements o a,zoo 2,400 lu Corpus Christi City Limits FEET 1238-3 A 0 CC AIRPORT 2 (SERVICE AREA 5) PAPE-DA WSON A-2023 ENGINEERS CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY JU Ts S07 N UPPER GRICADWAY STE 103 1 CDRPJG CHRIST TX-01 1 2 lo 375 9000 TEGAS ENGINEER Service Area Location Map s 1 2 3 4 6 6 5 7 9 18 _ 11 10 ....,. U5 12 14 16 19 � 1 13 17 20 21 6 w 6—E 6—C a , r B ^ e \ 4 6 6-13 K`aa a 6U < — 16I 6 J �6L L fh, f _ mW `1 A g a x om s = 6—S L-6—AD � e � � x 6—AE 6—AF a AA= o 6- 6—R 6—R 6AG 6—V R_x 6—Y � F 6 6-6 41 ,a,A 6—M : qN �> E) All / Eves t > . Legend � ��." 1 � � / % o " Service Area 4 �Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 5 Widening Projects Service Area 6 ———— New Projects AonN Service Area 7 Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan q Service Area 6 z ^w —Bond Project Service Area 9 � Intersection Improvements -11 Service Area 11 \ mo 1 o i soo a,000 Service Area 12 < FEET WESTSIDE 1 (SERVICE AREA 6) � PAPE-DAWSONA2023 �ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JC Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY R,NNPP eRo� rEGAzEN�NEERN�FRM� 0-R 037E900 Service Area Location Map 2 3 4 8 6 5 7 9 18 11 10 1 12 19 14 16 13 20 17 o 21 7-K 7-L 7-AG 7- C Ra L7-AK i 7-M __4 --7-AM 7-AQ 7-AI o 7- 7-N 7-AE 7-AF N, 7-AL/111 "I, 7-AP 7-AN 7 7-A 7-AH 7-H -R 7-1 7-S 7-AR PP. 7-13 7-AO 7 "y 7-C 7-D -7-T 7_U 7-V 7-X 7-Z 7-E 7-P 7-W 7-F if RII/ -AA 7 7-G 7-Q 7-AB PUE Legend Service Area 5 Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 6 Widening Projects Service Area 7 ———— New Projects Service Area 9 Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 11 0 Intersection Improvements Service Area 13 „.oE,��a o 1,000 2,000 Service Area 15 -------------- J FEET 1238-3 A 0 WESTSIDE 2 (SERVICE AREA 7) PAPE-DAWSON J.1 2023 ENGINEERS CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU Ts „mow„ 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY S07 N UPPER BRICADWAY T STE 103 1 CDRPJE CHRIST TX—1 210 375 9000 Service Area Location Map s 1 2 3 4 8 5 6 9 18 7 11 10 12 19 � 14 16 13 77 20 C 21 The proposed Harbor Bridge project is shown and is under construction now and anticipated to be completeded i h next few years. _ 8 8—H R 8—F 8—G 1 -- �— — . r , �s s � � v�R l- w � 2m Legend V VIE, N Service Area ———— New Projects Service Area 0 _Non Impact Fee Study VAR. Eligible Transportation Plan IS, �� z Service Area 9 —Bond Project 7-v� Corpus Christi City Limitsla,000 2,000 Intersection Improvements Widening Projects \ oa"v� . FEET DOWNTOWN (SERVICE AREA 8) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 ENGINEERS JU CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Ts new 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY S07NUPPER u—S rE�EN 1NEER1N�FIRM CHRIST,T RRR31210375900 ... ...... L I IL Service Area Location Map 2 3 4 8 6 5 7 9 Li 18 5 11 lu 15 12 16 19 9- 13 — 17 20 21 9-K 9-D _-1 IS 9-V 9 f -L vM Uw 9-F 9-E RE, 9-G . ....... J/1 S, -H %P� E�k o 9-R 10 Ue i'� Ce 94V -A 9 9-oT s� 9-S, -B Ak, KD 9N m Legend o R' Service Area 6 Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 7Widening Projects N Service Area 8 ———— New Projects Service Area 9 Non Impact lee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 10 Bond Project Service Area 11 1'000 2,000 Intersection Improvements Service Area 12 FEET -12383AO BAYSIDE 1 (SERVICE AREA 9) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 JENGINEERS CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS r JU Ts L. IMPACT FEE STUDY S07 N UPPER u—SWAY TEGASTE 103 1 CDEERINGCHRIST T RPUG X 01 1 210 375 9000 _— I S ENGINFIRM-0 Service Area Location Map z 3 4 4 g E 6 6 9 7 18 11 10 �� U5 12 16 19 14 1 13 77 20/ \P � 21 6 f a 3 10-1 �� 70-G V r o , q w ` 10-B u � 5 a o- n " g 3' Y vn � J 10-D 'E `NEF M`-, a L 7 �"��w e � p � j PN" J Yb " Y Legend Service Area 9 Corpus Christi City Limits j Service Area 10 Widening Projects N Service Area 12 -Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 13 -Bond Project Service Area 14 Intersection Improvements P' Service Area 16 l � a,zoo z,aoo Service Area 17 7 ,� FEET BAYSIDE 2 (SERVICE AREA 10) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 rd ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE�ENGNEERNGFRMR 0-0' 1037E900 o i Service Area Location Map s A y— ti w w ° 2 \ g 6 3 a 5 11 10 72 14 16 19 13 h17 20 21 e POE sHgN /r 11=A . �q s a ° e �, �11-B r' P z M \ ° 8� s a , o ° 11-D°Nsq ' l ,. � _ S? 11-E r 11-T E, e �� „r 11-V 11G � P / 11_Q 11-W \ ° H1H 11-U e , r � \:N r r A 11-Y r s m 11 X / ea 11-L <� x• 11-Z m 11-0 11 M i v � 11-N z , f, yCk Legend Service Area 6 Corpus Christi City Limits ��°°° v� R Service Area 7Widening Projects �-V��P" re,� '" "� ==s �N�� Service Area - - New Projects` ` Service Area 11 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 12 $) � —Bond Project ,` , ° Service Area 13 �- IntersectionImprovements ,.y—gsf � �,� 1,000 �2,000 Service Area 15 / ® SOUTHSIDE 1 (SERVICE AREA 11) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 rd o�w ENGINEERS JC CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY S07NUPPER BR°AD /EDEN NEERNECHRIST T—1 2103,ESRR z Service Area Location Map F / � HH ° e r � _ lu 12 19 `r s 14 16 13 17 20 J $ = a € x JC/ F z 21 _ w a s i d a� - / g t° 12-C r� a � o 3 ° « 12- r 12-E N' 2 q oa10 � 12-F s r 0 o e , a _ 12 12-1 12-H VV as r a 12-K 12-Jw„t 12L „ a� s„ h °E 12-N o, / 12-AK � RC <s° 12-0 12-AD 1 2-AJ - , Y 3, 12 Q 12-A p a� 12-P 12 AE 0 mss/ -12-R 12-AH / 12-AG > / °„ter �i Legend Service Area 6 Corpus Christi City Limits �a/ ° 12-S Service Area 9 Widening Projects N ew Service Area 10 ---- NProjects Service Area 11 Non Impact Fee Study x, Eligible Transportation Plan / 8 Service Area 12 a °^ c Intersection Improvements o� Service Area 13 Service Area 14 Service Area 15 v \ / i FEET SOUTHSIDE 2 (SERVICE AREA 12) PAPE-DAWSON J.1 2023 rd ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN” eR°° rE�ENGNEERNGFRMRa,R-0' 1037E900 Service Area Location Map zz w q 8 ° r 5 °ro 9 9 18 7 ' 10 19 14 17 20 1 �l a \ y 21 71 n ' ; 7 _ a o - 1.3C� 1 D> 7%\ y � Ma P \ ° IS 13—G 14 r — 13—Q 13-1 13K � a roti° e/s R �. v / �> —L 13 W _ _ t °R 13—M 'J `A Al 13—ABS (/ 13—AG — . 13—AF x.13—AC Legend Service Area Service Area 15 Service Area Service Area 17 N Service Area 10 Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 11 Widening Projects Service Area 12 ———— New Projects Service Area 13 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan o a,soo a,000 Service Area 14 Intersection Improvements FEET SOUTHSIDE 4 (SERVICE AREA 13) PAPE-DAWSON A..2023 ��ENGINEERS ojc CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE EN�NEERN�FRMR 0 ��' 1037E900 Service Area Location Map a w 3 &, 4 s / 6 �i 6 � L � 7 � 18 - _414 �� _ 11 lu q „ S ' � 12 96 19 „ 14 13 20 17 d 14-Q 21 SEE �2 \ , 14-R o C� A�T 4 s 1 - D- 14-S 7- 14-AE a H,k a E / 14-T"1 i 14-F� 14-D a „ 0 0 14-G rN"N � o � , � _ 7 - 4H 14-Z � 1 14 J 14-E � , i 4 ' 14-K 14-AA „ z � e? 14-L r T� o 14-M 14-AL, 14-AB 14-AJ 14 AG °'14-AI 14-N =ti �14-AC 14-AH " ns E 4 <PC ,9 a v � z r Legend Service Area 9 Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 10 Widening Projects N Service Area 12 ———— New Projects Service Area 13 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 14 0 Intersection Improvements Service Area 16 o a,000 2,000 Service Area 17 FEET SOUTHSIDE 3 (SERVICE AREA 14) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 rd ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JC Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE�ENGNEERNGFRMR 0-0' 1037E900 f� Service Area Location Map a a � t a � e z i 3 6 6 E o 5 9 ar�E� tir 7 18 11 10 S 11T5 12 � 14 96 19 � s 1 13 17 20 z1 6 .,s. g � , g � F 15—V " p r w — 9 , 15—U � x.oEPAa. ��. P.a. US, PC , e o � s 15—B 15—A,/ `v `✓� 15—C S /i 15—D zoo, 15—F 15—K-I 15—L 15—G µ ,15-1 P. 15—I Legend Service Area 5 'Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 6 Widening Projects Service Area ———— New Projects N Service Area 9 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 11 � Intersection Improvements Service Area 12 Service Area 13 0 1,500 3,000 Service Area 15 FEET LONDON (SERVICE AREA 15) PAPE-DAWSON A-2023 rd o�w ENGINEERS JU CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" 5R°° TE�ENGINEERING FIRM R 0 ��' 1037E900 Service Area Location Map s 1 2 3 4 6 6 5 7 9 18 11 10 U5 12 14 16 19 � 1 13 17 20 € e g , 21 1 s j � ASE o 0 1p"t \' y g SIR e a o: a' 16—E °°F d z 16—G— 16—F 16 H 16—M � � o �A90 16-1 ` 16—J' 4/ 16—K j y�5 io 16—L i Legend N Service Area 10 Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 14 -Widening Projects Service Area 16 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 17 � Intersection Improvements � o ,zoo 2,400 Service Area 21 FEET FLOUR BLUFF 1 (SERVICE AREA 16) PAPE-DAWSON J.1 2023 rd ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE�EN�NEERN�FRMR 0 RE 037E900 p � GO Service Area Location Map i W �3 ,f T / r,�y� s E �:. 6 s e� ,s;�1 o 12� 14 X16�, 13' 77 20 s � r € ,P a \g � r 21 �w ?� z h� = 17—Q 17—X ff 17—L 17—R g i 9 17—SIN," 17—M _ d 17— � — :� s N a 1 7G 17—T � a IF e 17—F 17-0 17-H o > \ 17—D17-1 r 17—E 17—C 17—P � � a 17—B 17—J e 17—V / 17—Wi g 17—A Z _ 3= Legend N Service Area 13 Widening Projects Service Area 14 ———— New Projects Service Area 16 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan _Service Area 17 � Intersection Improvements o a,zoo 2,400 Corpus Christi City Limits FEET FLOUR BLUFF 2 (SERVICE AREA 17) PAPE-DAWSON J.1 2023 ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS 1.0 1 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE ENGINEERING FIRM R 0 Service Area Location Map s 1 2 3 4 8 6 5 7 9 18 11 10 12 16 19 14 1 13 17 20 z 21 6 i s E C 18-P A.9 18-Z 18-H 18-0 18-AB 18-Y 18-G a 18-N 18-AA 18-X 18-F 18-M 18-E 18-V 18-U 18-D 18-L\ , 18-T ii 8-S 18-C 18-K f 18-R 18-Q 18-B 18-J",/1 8-A 18-W N 18-1 N Legend Service Area 18 Widening Projects Service Area 19 ———— New Projects Corpus Christi City Limits _Non Impact Fee Study o a,000 2,000 Eligible Transportation Plan FEET PADRE ISLAND 1 (SERVICE AREA 18) PAPE-DAWSON 2023ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE�ENGINEERING FIRM A70 ��1121�T'ESRR Service Area Location Map a �a� 2 d �3 4 -- 6 s 9 18�7 04, j 12 c16� ig 14 /� 18113\ € 17 �� 20/ 21 6 Moll z 1 i s E C z a 4 d e a 1 x 19-A a e N Legend Service Area 18 Corpus Christi City Limits Service Area 19 Widening Projects Service Area 20 _Non Impact Fee Study o a,zoo z,aoo Eligible Transportation Plan FEET PADRE ISLAND 2 (SERVICE AREA 19) PAPE-DAWSON -2023 rd ENGINEERS o�w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS JU 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° TE ENGINEERING FIRM R 0 ��' '�T'ESRR _::1 Service Area Location Map a �a� d �3 4 --� 6 5 7 / 10 .l s 15 a T 7 1112 '16 19 1 Li 19- 4 7 �� -20/ �f % 21 ' 6 i s E s C 1 z 20-D 4 d 7 8 tea`°qo a e y 20-E 20-C x � - 20-Ja I20-1 20-A 20-B 3 � x = Legend N Service Area 19 ———— New Projects Service Area 20 _Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 21 —Bond Project I�Corpus Christi City Limits o o z,000 Intersection Improvements Widening Projects I FEET PADRE ISLAND 3 (SERVICE AREA 20) PAPE-DAWSON rd ENGINEERS o'w CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS Ts 1.0 IMPACT FEE STUDY °'NN" eR°° rE�ENGNEERNGFRMR 0-0' 1037E900 ) Service Area Location Map } 11 10 ) ~ ! ) - ® 12 14 16 } � ~ �• ) Z � f : ) 21 — . . x J : - ` 0 Z � ° ! . »\,, . » ! .2� � \\ �;\ ( ] : ~ ` ® 2182 } < ] 21 E{� • \\ ��°~ � - � _ ! _ 21-13 21- —=---- ��» � ^% t% REP 21- ! 21 F 21-t- Legend N Sewice Area 20 Non Impact Fee Study Eligible Transportation Plan Service Area 21 Bond D��a_m_s . Intersection p _m Projects , _ _ --.rte m FeET PADRE ISLAND 4 (SERVICE AREA 21) P PE DAWSONA2023 ` JU CORPUS ami CHRISTI, ENGINEERS / �,2� q�c�Esry �__W ;C2_, = Appendix E Project Cost Estimates 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Northwest Blvd to 765'N of Lake Grande Ave roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,115 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,815 cy $ 16.91 $ 115,242 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,925 sy $ 11.70 $ 151,223 B8 Underseal 12,925 sy $ 6.46 $ 83,496 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,925 sy $ 18.99 $ 245,446 B13 lConcrete Median 8,460 sf $ 53.96 $ 456,502 D4 ISidewalk 7,050 sy $ 50.00 $ 352,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,404,407 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 56,176 V Prep ROW 4% $ 56,176 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 42,132 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 70,220 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 491,542 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,220 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,220 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,088 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 84,264 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 912,865 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,317,272 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 463,454 Construction Cost TOT $ 2,781,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,781,000 Bonds: 5% $ 139,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 417,150 Mobilization 10% $ 278,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 417,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,032,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 765'N of Lake Grande Ave to Lake Grande Ave roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 675 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,175 cy $ 16.91 $ 36,779 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,125 sy $ 11.70 $ 48,263 B8 JUnderseal 4,125 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 26,648 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,125 sy $ 18.99 $ 78,334 B13 lConcrete Median 2,700 sf $ 53.96 $ 145,692 D4 ISidewalk 2,250 sy $ 50.00 $ 112,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 448,215 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,979- V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,929 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,446 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,411 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 156,875 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,411 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,411 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,964 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 26,893 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 291,340 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 739,555 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 147,911 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 888,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 888,000 Bonds: 5% $ 44,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 133,200 Mobilization 10% $ 88,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 133,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,288,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lake Grande Ave to 294'S of Valley View Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 525 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,692 cy $ 16.91 $ 28,606 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,208 sy $ 11.70 $ 37,538 B8 JUnderseal 3,208 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 20,726 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,208 sy $ 18.99 $ 60,926 B13 lConcrete Median 2,100 sf $ 53.96 $ 113,316 D4 ISidewalk 1,750 sy $ 50.00 $ 87,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 348,612 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 13,944 V Prep ROW 4% $ 13,944 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,458 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 17,431 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 122,014 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,431 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,431 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,972 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 20,917 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 226,598 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 575,209 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 115,042 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 691,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 691,000 Bonds: 5% $ 34,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 103,650 Mobilization 10% $ 69,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 103,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,002,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Northwest Blvd to 1690'S of Northwest Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,690 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,383 cy $ 16.91 $ 107,935 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,203 sy $ 11.70 $ 142,771 B8 JUnderseal 12,203 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 78,829 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,203 sy $ 18.99 $ 231,729 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,632 sy $ 50.00 $ 281,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 842,864 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,715 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,715 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,286 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,143 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 295,003 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,143 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,143 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,857 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,572 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 547,862 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,390,726 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 278,145 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,669,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,669,000 Bonds: 5% $ 83,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 250,350 Mobilization 10% $ 166,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 250,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,420,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1690'S of Northwest Blvd to CR 52 roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,478 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,585 cy $ 16.91 $ 94,443 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,677 sy $ 11.70 $ 124,925 B8 JUnderseal 10,677 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 68,976 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,677 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 202,763 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,928 sy $ 50.00 $ 246,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 737,506 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,500 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,500 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,125 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,875 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 258,127 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,875 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,875 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,750 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,250 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 479,379 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,216,886 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 243,377 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,461,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,461,000 Bonds: 5% $ 73,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 219,150 Mobilization 10% $ 146,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 219,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,118,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1644'W of Wright Moravek Rd to Wright Moravek Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,644 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,581 cy $ 16.91 $ 128,189 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,613 sy $ 11.70 $ 170,976 B8 JUnderseal 14,613 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 94,402 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,613 sy $ 18.99 $ 277,507 B13 lConcrete Median 8,220 sf $ 53.96 $ 443,551 D4 ISidewalk 5,480 sy $ 50.00 $ 274,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,388,626 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 55,545 V Prep ROW 4% $ 55,545 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 41,659 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 69,431 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 486,019 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,431 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,431 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,773 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 83,318 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 902,607 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,291,232 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 458,246 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,750,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,750,000 Bonds: 5% $ 137,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 412,500 Mobilization 10% $ 275,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 412,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,988,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Wright Moravek Rd to River Trail St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,105 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,706 cy $ 16.91 $ 164,135 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,711 sy $ 11.70 $ 218,920 B8 JUnderseal 18,711 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 120,874 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,711 sy $ 18.99 $ 355,324 B13 lConcrete Median 10,525 sf $ 53.96 $ 567,929 D4 ISidewalk 7,017 sy $ 50.00 $ 350,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,778,015 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,340 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 88,901 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 622,305 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,901 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,901 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,560 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,681 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,155,710 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,933,725 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 586,745 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,521,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,521,000 Bonds: 5% $ 176,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 528,150 Mobilization 10% $ 352,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 528,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,105,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: River Trail St to E Riverview Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,146 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,895 cy $ 16.91 $ 167,332 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,076 sy $ 11.70 $ 223,184 B8 JUnderseal 19,076 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 123,228 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,076 sy $ 18.99 $ 362,245 B13 lConcrete Median 10,730 sf $ 53.96 $ 578,991 D4 ISidewalk 7,153 sy $ 50.00 $ 357,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,812,646 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 72,506 V Prep ROW 4% $ 72,506 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 54,379 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 90,632 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 634,426 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,632 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,632 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 36,253 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 108,759 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,178,220 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,990,866 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 598,173 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,590,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,590,000 Bonds: 5% $ 179,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 538,500 Mobilization 10% $ 359,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 538,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,206,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: E Riverview Dr to Wood River Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 920 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,242 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,736 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,178 sy $ 11.70 $ 95,680 B8 JUnderseal 8,178 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 52,828 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,178 sy $ 18.99 $ 155,296 B13 lConcrete Median 4,600 sf $ 53.96 $ 248,216 D4 ISidewalk 3,067 sy $ 50.00 $ 153,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 777,090 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 31,084 V Prep ROW 4% $ 31,084 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 23,313 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 38,854 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 271,981 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,854 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,854 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,542 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 46,625 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 505,108 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,282,198 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 256,440 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,539,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,539,000 Bonds: 5% $ 76,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 230,850 Mobilization 10% $ 153,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 230,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,232,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Wood River Rd to Trinity River Dr/EM 1889 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 647 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,983 cy $ 16.91 $ 50,449 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,751 sy $ 11.70 $ 67,288 B8 JUnderseal 5,751 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 37,152 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,751 sy $ 18.99 $ 109,214 B13 lConcrete Median 3,235 sf $ 53.96 $ 174,561 D4 ISidewalk 2,157 sy $ 50.00 $ 107,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 546,497 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,860 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,860 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,395 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 27,325 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 191,274 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,325 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,325 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,930 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 32,790 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 355,223 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 901,720 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 180,344 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 54,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 162,450 Mobilization 10% $ 108,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 162,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,570,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Trinity River Dr/FM 1889 to River Hill Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,270 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,469 cy $ 16.91 $ 177,032 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,181 sy $ 11.70 $ 236,122 B8 JUnderseal 20,181 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 130,371 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,181 sy $ 18.99 $ 383,244 B13 lConcrete Median 11,352 sf $ 53.96 $ 612,554 D4 ISidewalk 7,568 sy $ 50.00 $ 378,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,917,722 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 76,709 V Prep ROW 4% $ 76,709 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 57,532 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 95,886 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 671,203 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 95,886 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 95,886 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 38,354 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 115,063 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,246,520 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,164,242 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 632,848 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,798,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,798,000 Bonds: 5% $ 189,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 569,700 Mobilization 10% $ 379,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 569,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,507,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: River Hill Drto CR 69 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,226 cy $ 16.91 $ 172,915 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,712 sy $ 11.70 $ 230,630 B8 JUnderseal 19,712 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 127,340 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,712 sy $ 18.99 $ 374,331 B13 lConcrete Median 11,088 sf $ 53.96 $ 598,308 D4 ISidewalk 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,873,124 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 74,925 V Prep ROW 4% $ 74,925 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 56,194 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 93,656 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 655,593 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,656 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,656 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 37,462 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 112,387 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,217,531 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,090,655 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 618,131 Construction Cost TOT $ 3,709,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,709,000 Bonds: 5% $ 185,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 556,350 Mobilization 10% $ 370,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 556,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,378,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: CR 69 to Riverside Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,426 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,574 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,160 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,672 sy $ 11.70 $ 148,262 B8 JUnderseal 12,672 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 81,861 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,672 sy $ 18.99 $ 240,641 B13 lConcrete Median 7,128 sf $ 53.96 $ 384,627 D4 ISidewalk 4,752 sy $ 50.00 $ 237,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,204,151 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 48,166 V Prep ROW 4% $ 48,166 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,125 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 60,208 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 421,453 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,208 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,208 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,083 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 72,249 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 782,698 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,986,850 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 397,370 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,385,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,385,000 Bonds: 5% $ 119,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 357,750 Mobilization 10% $ 238,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 357,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,458,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Riverside Blvd to River E Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 845 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,895 cy $ 16.91 $ 65,872 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,509 sy $ 11.70 $ 87,859 B8 JUnderseal 7,509 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 48,510 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,509 sy $ 18.99 $ 142,602 B13 lConcrete Median 4,224 sf $ 53.96 $ 227,927 D4 ISidewalk 2,816 sy $ 50.00 $ 140,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 713,571 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,543 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,543 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,407 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,679 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 249,750 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,679 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,679 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,271 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,814 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 463,821 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,177,392 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 235,478 Construction Cost TOT $ 1,413,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,413,000 Bonds: 5% $ 70,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 211,950 Mobilization 10% $ 141,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 211,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,049,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 1-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 69E to 1145'W of IH 69E roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,162 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,388 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,206 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,389 sy $ 11.70 $ 98,155 B8 JUnderseal 8,389 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 54,195 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,389 sy $ 18.99 $ 159,313 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,872 sy $ 50.00 $ 193,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 579,469 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,179 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,179 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,384 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,973 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 202,814 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,973 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,973 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,589 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 34,768 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 376,655 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 956,124 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 191,225 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,148,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,148,000 Bonds: 5% $ 57,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 172,200 Mobilization 10% $ 114,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 172,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,665,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-11 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to 2057'S of Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,057 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,028 cy $ 16.91 $ 85,027 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,371 sy $ 13.78 $ 129,129 B8 JUnderseal 9,371 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 60,535 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 9,828 sy $ 5.65 $ 55,528 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,857 sy $ 50.00 $ 342,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 673,053 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,922 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,922 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,192 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 33,653 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 235,568 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,653 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,653 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,461 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,383 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 437,484 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,110,537 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 222,107 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,333,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,333,000 Bonds: 5% $ 66,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 199,950 Mobilization 10% $ 133,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 199,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,933,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-U This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 37 to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 557 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,568 cy $ 16.91 $ 43,431 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,951 sy $ 11.70 $ 57,928 B8 JUnderseal 4,951 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,984 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,951 sy $ 18.99 $ 94,022 B13 lConcrete Median 2,785 sf $ 53.96 $ 150,279 D4 ISidewalk 1,857 sy $ 50.00 $ 92,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 470,477 Major Construction Component Allowances: W Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,819 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,819 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,114 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,524 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 164,667 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,524 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,524 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,410 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,229 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 305,810 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 776,287 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 155,257 Construction Cost TOT $ 932,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 932,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 139,800 Mobilization 10% $ 93,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 139,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,351,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-V This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Hearn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,529 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,662 cy $ 16.91 $ 197,196 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,480 sy $ 11.70 $ 263,016 B8 Underseal 22,480 sy $ 6.46 $ 145,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,480 sy $ 18.99 $ 426,895 B13 lConcrete Median 12,645 sf $ 53.96 $ 682,324 D4 ISidewalk 8,430 sy $ 50.00 $ 421,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,136,152 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 85,446 V Prep ROW 4% $ 85,446 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 64,085 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 106,808 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 747,653 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,808 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,808 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,723 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 128,169 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,388,499 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,524,651 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 704,930 Construction Cost TOT $ 4,230,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,230,000 Bonds: 5% $ 211,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 634,500 Mobilization 10% $ 423,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 634,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,134,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-W This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Hearn Rd to 2350'S of Hearn rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,335 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,767 cy $ 16.91 $ 182,069 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,756 sy $ 11.70 $ 242,840 B8 JUnderseal 20,756 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 134,081 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,756 sy $ 18.99 $ 394,148 B13 lConcrete Median 11,675 sf $ 53.96 $ 629,983 D4 ISidewalk 7,783 sy $ 50.00 $ 389,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,972,288 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 78,892 V Prep ROW 4% $ 78,892 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 59,169 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 98,614 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 690,301 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 98,614 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 98,614 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 39,446 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 118,337 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,281,987 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,254,275 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 650,855 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,906,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,906,000 Bonds: 5% $ 195,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 585,900 Mobilization 10% $ 390,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 585,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,664,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-X This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 2350'S of Hearn rd to 4060'S of Hearn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,742 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,034 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,862 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,488 sy $ 11.70 $ 181,210 B8 JUnderseal 15,488 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 100,052 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,488 sy $ 18.99 $ 294,117 B13 lConcrete Median 8,712 sf $ 53.96 $ 470,100 D4 ISidewalk 5,808 sy $ 50.00 $ 290,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,471,740 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,870 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,870 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,152 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,587 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 515,109 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,435 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,304 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 956,631 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,428,372 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 485,674 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,915,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,915,000 Bonds: 5% $ 145,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 437,250 Mobilization 10% $ 291,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 437,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,227,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-Y This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Northwest Blvd to 1675'S of Northwest Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,690 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,444 cy $ 16.91 $ 92,063 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,325 sy $ 11.70 $ 120,806 B8 JUnderseal 10,325 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 66,702 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,325 sy $ 18.99 $ 196,078 B13 lConcrete Median 6,758 sf $ 53.96 $ 364,683 D4 ISidewalk 5,632 sy $ 50.00 $ 281,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,121,932 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 44,877 V Prep ROW 4% $ 44,877 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 33,658 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 56,097 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 392,676 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,097 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,097 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,439 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 67,316 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 729,256 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,851,188 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 370,238 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,222,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,222,000 Bonds: 5% $ 111,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 333,300 Mobilization 10% $ 222,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 333,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,222,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 1-Z This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1675'S of Northwest Blvd to 2245'S of Northwest Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 528 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,701 cy $ 16.91 $ 28,770 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,227 sy $ 11.70 $ 37,752 B8 JUnderseal 3,227 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 20,844 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,227 sy $ 18.99 $ 61,274 B13 lConcrete Median 2,112 sf $ 53.96 $ 113,964 D4 ISidewalk 1,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 88,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 350,604 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 14,024 V Prep ROW 4% $ 14,024 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,518 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 17,530 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 122,711 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,530 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,530 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,012 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,036 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 227,892 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 578,496 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 115,699 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 695,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 695,000 Bonds: 5% $ 34,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 104,250 Mobilization 10% $ 69,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 104,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,008,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • • • »„ ■- • Project Number: 1-0 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 570'E of Emory Dr to Emory Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 528 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,995 cy $ 16.91 $ 33,730 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 44,616 B8 IUnderseal I 3,813 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 24,634 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 72,415 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 88,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 263,395 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,536 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,536 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,902 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 13,170 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 92,188 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,170 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,170 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,268 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,804 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 171,207 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 434,602 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 86,920 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 522,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 522,000 Bonds: 5% $ 26,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 78,300 Mobilization 10% $ 52,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 78,300 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 757,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project In17 Description: Project No. 1 Project - Project Number: 1-13 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Emory Dr to IH 69E roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 4,118 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 15,558 cy $ 16.91 $ 263,093 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 29,744 sy $ 11.70 $ 348,005 B8 IUnderseal I 29,744 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 192,146 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 29,744 sy $ 18.99 $ 564,839 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 13,728 sy $ 50.00 $ 686,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,054,482 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 82,179 V Prep ROW 4% $ 82,179 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 61,634 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 102,724 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 719,069 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 102,724 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 102,724 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 41,090 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 123,269 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,413 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,789,896 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 757,979 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,548,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,548,000 Bonds: 5% $ 227,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 682,200 Mobilization 10% $ 454,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 682,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,595,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- ""-k� Description: Project No. 11-S Project Number: 1-S This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 2057'S of Leopard St to Hearn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,373 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,356 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,745 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,254 sy $ 13.78 $ 86,178 B8 IUnderseal I 6,254 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 40,400 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,559 sy $ 5.65 $ 37,058 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,576 sy $ 50.00 $ 228,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 449,182 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,967 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,967 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,475 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,459 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 157,214 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,459 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,459 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,984 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 26,951 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 291,968 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 741,150 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 148,230 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 890,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 890,000 Bonds: 5% $ 44,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 133,500 Mobilization 10% $ 89,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 133,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,291,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 1-AA Project Number: 1-AA This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: W River Dr to 2190'W of W River Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,165 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,292 cy $ 16.91 $ 89,483 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,862 sy $ 13.78 $ 135,897 B8 IUnderseal I 9,862 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 63,708 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,343 sy $ 5.65 $ 58,438 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,216 sy $ 50.00 $ 360,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 708,325 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,333 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,333 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,250 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,416 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 247,914 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,416 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,416 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,166 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,499 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 460,411 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,168,736 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 233,747 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,403,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,403,000 Bonds: 5% $ 70,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 210,450 Mobilization 10% $ 140,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 210,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,034,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 1-AB Project Number: 1-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 2190'W of W River Drto Wright Moravek Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,112 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,163 cy $ 16.91 $ 87,301 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,621 sy $ 13.78 $ 132,582 B8 IUnderseal I 9,621 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 62,154 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,091 sy $ 5.65 $ 57,012 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,040 sy $ 50.00 $ 352,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 691,049 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 27,642 V Prep ROW 4% $ 27,642 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,731 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 34,552 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 241,867 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,552 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,552 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,821 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 41,463 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 449,182 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,140,230 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 228,046 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,369,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,369,000 Bonds: 5% $ 68,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 205,350 Mobilization 10% $ 136,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 205,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,985,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 1-AC Project Number: 1-AC This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1975'W of Wright Movarek Rd to Wright Moravek Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,901 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,646 cy $ 16.91 $ 78,571 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,659 sy $ 13.78 $ 119,324 B8 IUnderseal I 8,659 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 55,938 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,082 sy $ 5.65 $ 51,311 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,336 sy $ 50.00 $ 316,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 621,944 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,878 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,878 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,658 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 31,097 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 217,680 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,097 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,097 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,439 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,317 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 404,264 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,026,207 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 205,241 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,232,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,232,000 Bonds: 5% $ 61,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 184,800 Mobilization 10% $ 123,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 184,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,786,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 1-AD Project Number: 1-AD This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 347'S of River Rock Dr to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,373 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,356 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,745 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,254 sy $ 13.78 $ 86,178 B8 IUnderseal I 6,254 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 40,400 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,559 sy $ 5.65 $ 37,058 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,576 sy $ 50.00 $ 228,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 449,182 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,967 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,967 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,475 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,459 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 157,214 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,459 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,459 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,984 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 26,951 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 291,968 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 741,150 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 148,230 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 890,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 890,000 Bonds: 5% $ 44,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 133,500 Mobilization 10% $ 89,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 133,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,291,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-rV , Description: Project No. 1-AE Project Number: 1-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Northwest Blvd to 2052'S of Northwest Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,052 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,016 cy $ 16.91 $ 84,821 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,348 sy $ 13.78 $ 128,815 B8 IUnderseal I 9,348 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 60,388 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,804 sy $ 5.65 $ 55,393 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,840 sy $ 50.00 $ 342,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 671,417 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,857 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,857 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,143 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 33,571 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 234,996 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,571 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,571 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,428 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,285 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 436,421 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,107,838 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 221,568 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,330,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,330,000 Bonds: 5% $ 66,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 199,500 Mobilization 10% $ 133,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 199,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,929,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 1-AF Project Number: 1-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 2052'S of Northwest Blvd to 3650'S of Northwest Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,872 cy $ 16.91 $ 65,476 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,216 sy $ 13.78 $ 99,436 B8 IUnderseal I 7,216 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 46,615 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,568 sy $ 5.65 $ 42,759 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 518,287 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,731 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,731 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,549 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,914 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 181,400 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,914 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,914 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,366 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,097 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 336,886 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 855,173 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 171,035 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,027,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,027,000 Bonds: 5% $ 51,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 154,050 Mobilization 10% $ 102,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 154,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,489,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 1-AG Project Number: 1-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 3650'S of Northwest Blvd to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 686 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,678 cy $ 16.91 $ 28,373 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,127 sy $ 13.78 $ 43,089 B8 IUnderseal I 3,127 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 20,200 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,279 sy $ 5.65 $ 18,529 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,288 sy $ 50.00 $ 114,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 224,591 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 8,984 V Prep ROW 4% $ 8,984 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 6,738 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 11,230 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 78,607 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 11,230 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 11,230 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,492 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 13,475 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 145,984 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 370,575 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 74,115 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 445,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 445,000 Bonds: 5% $ 22,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 66,750 Mobilization 10% $ 44,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 66,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 645,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • »,, Description: Project No. 1-AH Project Number: 1-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Wright Moravek Rd to 2115'E of Wright Movarek Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,112 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,805 cy $ 16.91 $ 115,078 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,907 sy $ 11.70 $ 151,008 B8 IUnderseal I 12,907 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 83,377 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,907 sy $ 18.99 $ 245,098 B13 lConcrete Median 8,448 sf $ 53.96 $ 455,854 D4 ISidewalk I 7,040 sy $ 50.00 $ 352,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,402,415 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 56,097 V Prep ROW 4% $ 56,097 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 42,072 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 70,121 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 490,845 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,121 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,121 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,048 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 84,145 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 911,570 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,313,985 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 462,797 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,777,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,777,000 Bonds: 5% $ 138,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 416,550 Mobilization 10% $ 277,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 416,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,027,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 1-Al Project Number: 1-AI This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 2115'E of Wright Movarek Rd to 2975'E of Wright Moi roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 761 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,452 cy $ 16.91 $ 41,465 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,651 sy $ 11.70 $ 54,412 B8 IUnderseal I 4,651 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 30,043 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,651 sy $ 18.99 $ 88,314 B13 lConcrete Median 3,044 sf $ 53.96 $ 164,254 D4 ISidewalk I 2,537 sy $ 50.00 $ 126,833 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 505,321 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,213 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,213 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,160 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,266 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 176,862 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,266 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,266 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,106 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 30,319 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 328,459 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 833,780 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 166,756 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,001,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,001,000 Bonds: 5% $ 50,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 150,150 Mobilization 10% $ 100,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 150,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,451,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 1-AJ Project Number: 1-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Northwest Blvd to Lake Athens Ave roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,112 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,163 cy $ 16.91 $ 87,301 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,621 sy $ 13.78 $ 132,582 B8 IUnderseal I 9,621 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 62,154 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,091 sy $ 5.65 $ 57,012 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,040 sy $ 50.00 $ 352,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 691,049 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 27,642 V Prep ROW 4% $ 27,642 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,731 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 34,552 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 241,867 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,552 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,552 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,821 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 41,463 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 449,182 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,140,230 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 228,046 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,369,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,369,000 Bonds: 5% $ 68,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 205,350 Mobilization 10% $ 136,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 205,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,985,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 1-AK Project Number: 1-AK This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Lake Athens Ave to 221'S of Lake Athens Ave roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 211 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 516 cy $ 16.91 $ 8,730 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 962 sy $ 13.78 $ 13,258 B8 IUnderseal I 962 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 6,215 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,009 sy $ 5.65 $ 5,701 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 704 sy $ 50.00 $ 35,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 69,105 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 2,764 V Prep ROW 4% $ 2,764 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 2,073 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 3,455 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 24,187 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 3,455 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 3,455 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,382 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 4,146 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 44,918 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 114,023 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 22,805 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 137,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 137,000 Bonds: 5% $ 6,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 20,550 Mobilization 10% $ 13,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 20,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 199,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 1-AL Project Number: 1-AL This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Northwest Blvd to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,286 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,032 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,829 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,970 sy $ 13.78 $ 206,280 B8 IUnderseal I 14,970 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 96,703 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 15,700 sy $ 5.65 $ 88,704 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,953 sy $ 50.00 $ 547,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,075,183 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 43,007 V Prep ROW 4% $ 43,007 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 32,255 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 53,759 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 376,314 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,759 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,759 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,504 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 64,511 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,098,869 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,174,052 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 434,810 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,609,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,609,000 Bonds: 5% $ 130,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 391,350 Mobilization 10% $ 260,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 391,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,783,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 1-AM Project Number: 1-AM This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: CR 69 to 1400'E of CR 69 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,426 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,485 cy $ 16.91 $ 58,928 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,494 sy $ 13.78 $ 89,493 B8 IUnderseal I 6,494 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 41,954 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,811 sy $ 5.65 $ 38,483 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,752 sy $ 50.00 $ 237,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 466,458 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,658 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,658 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,994 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,323 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 163,260 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,323 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,323 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,329 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 27,987 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 303,198 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 769,656 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 153,931 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 924,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 924,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 138,600 Mobilization 10% $ 92,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 138,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,340,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 1-AN Project Number: 1-AN This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1400'E of CR 69 to 3105'E of CR 69 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,690 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,130 cy $ 16.91 $ 69,841 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,697 sy $ 13.78 $ 106,066 B8 IUnderseal I 7,697 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 49,723 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,073 sy $ 5.65 $ 45,610 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,632 sy $ 50.00 $ 281,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 552,839 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,114 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,114 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,585 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 27,642 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 193,494 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,642 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,642 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,057 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,170 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 359,345 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 912,184 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 182,437 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,095,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,095,000 Bonds: 5% $ 54,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 164,250 Mobilization 10% $ 109,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 164,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,588,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 1-AQ Project Number: 1-AQ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1750'S of Northwest Blvd to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,428 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,491 cy $ 16.91 $ 59,027 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,505 sy $ 13.78 $ 89,643 B8 IUnderseal I 6,505 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 42,024 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,823 sy $ 5.65 $ 38,548 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 238,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 467,243 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,690 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,690 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,017 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,362 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 163,535 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,362 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,362 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,345 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,035 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 303,708 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 770,951 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 154,190 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 926,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 926,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 138,900 Mobilization 10% $ 92,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 138,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,343,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 1-AR Project Number: 1-AR This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: IH 69E to 4230'E of IH 69E roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,330 Service Area(s): Northwest 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,583 cy $ 16.91 $ 178,966 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 19,724 sy $ 13.78 $ 271,793 B8 IUnderseal I 19,724 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 127,415 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 20,686 sy $ 5.65 $ 116,875 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 14,432 sy $ 50.00 $ 721,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,416,650 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 56,666 V Prep ROW 4% $ 56,666 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 42,499 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 70,832 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 495,827 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,832 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,832 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,333 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 84,999 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,320,822 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,737,472 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 547,494 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,285,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,285,000 Bonds: 5% $ 164,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 492,750 Mobilization 10% $ 328,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 492,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,763,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: New PR Roadway to Warrior Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,038 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,567 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,046 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,454 sy $ 11.70 $ 145,717 B8 JUnderseal 12,454 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 80,456 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,454 sy $ 18.99 $ 236,510 B13 lConcrete Median 8,152 sf $ 53.96 $ 439,882 D4 ISidewalk 6,793 sy $ 50.00 $ 339,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,353,277 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 54,131 V Prep ROW 4% $ 54,131 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 40,598 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 67,664 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 473,647 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,664 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,664 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,066 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,197 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 879,630 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,232,908 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 446,582 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,680,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,680,000 Bonds: 5% $ 134,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 402,000 Mobilization 10% $ 268,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 402,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,886,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Warrior Dr to McKinzie Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy 1 $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy 1 $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 37 to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 557 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,568 cy $ 16.91 $ 43,431 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,951 sy $ 11.70 $ 57,928 B8 JUnderseal 4,951 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,984 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,951 sy $ 18.99 $ 94,022 B13 lConcrete Median 2,785 sf $ 53.96 $ 150,279 D4 ISidewalk 1,857 sy $ 50.00 $ 92,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 470,477 Major Construction Component Allowances: W Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,819 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,819 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,114 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,524 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 164,667 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,524 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,524 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,410 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,229 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 305,810 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 776,287 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 155,257 Construction Cost TOT $ 932,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 932,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 139,800 Mobilization 10% $ 93,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 139,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,351,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Hearn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,529 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,662 cy $ 16.91 $ 197,196 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,480 sy $ 11.70 $ 263,016 B8 Underseal 22,480 sy $ 6.46 $ 145,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,480 sy $ 18.99 $ 426,895 B13 lConcrete Median 12,645 sf $ 53.96 $ 682,324 D4 ISidewalk 8,430 sy $ 50.00 $ 421,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,136,152 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 85,446 V Prep ROW 4% $ 85,446 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 64,085 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 106,808 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 747,653 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,808 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,808 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,723 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 128,169 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,388,499 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,524,651 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 704,930 Construction Cost TOT $ 4,230,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,230,000 Bonds: 5% $ 211,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 634,500 Mobilization 10% $ 423,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 634,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,134,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Hearn Rd to 2350'S of Hearn rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,335 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,767 cy $ 16.91 $ 182,069 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,756 sy $ 11.70 $ 242,840 B8 JUnderseal 20,756 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 134,081 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,756 sy $ 18.99 $ 394,148 B13 lConcrete Median 11,675 sf $ 53.96 $ 629,983 D4 ISidewalk 7,783 sy $ 50.00 $ 389,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,972,288 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 78,892 V Prep ROW 4% $ 78,892 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 59,169 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 98,614 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 690,301 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 98,614 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 98,614 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 39,446 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 118,337 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,281,987 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,254,275 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 650,855 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,906,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,906,000 Bonds: 5% $ 195,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 585,900 Mobilization 10% $ 390,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 585,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,664,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 2350'S of Hearn rd to 4060'S of Hearn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,742 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,034 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,862 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,488 sy $ 11.70 $ 181,210 B8 JUnderseal 15,488 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 100,052 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,488 sy $ 18.99 $ 294,117 B13 lConcrete Median 8,712 sf $ 53.96 $ 470,100 D4 ISidewalk 5,808 sy $ 50.00 $ 290,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,471,740 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,870 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,870 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,152 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,587 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 515,109 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,435 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,304 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 956,631 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,428,372 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 485,674 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,915,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,915,000 Bonds: 5% $ 145,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 437,250 Mobilization 10% $ 291,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 437,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,227,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH-37 to Up River Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 370 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,191 cy $ 16.91 $ 20,139 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 2,259 sy $ 11.70 $ 26,426 B8 JUnderseal 2,259 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 14,591 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 2,259 sy $ 18.99 $ 42,892 B13 lConcrete Median 1,478 sf $ 53.96 $ 79,774 D4 ISidewalk 1,232 sy $ 50.00 $ 61,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 245,423 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 9,817 V Prep ROW 4% $ 9,817 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,363 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 12,271 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 85,898 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,271 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,271 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,908 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 14,725 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 159,525 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 404,947 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 80,989 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 486,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 486,000 Bonds: 5% $ 24,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 72,900 Mobilization 10% $ 48,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 72,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 705,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Up River Rd to Creek View Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 950 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,062 cy $ 16.91 $ 51,785 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,808 sy $ 11.70 $ 67,954 B8 JUnderseal 5,808 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 37,520 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,808 sy $ 18.99 $ 110,294 B13 lConcrete Median 3,802 sf $ 53.96 $ 205,134 D4 ISidewalk 3,168 sy $ 50.00 $ 158,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 631,087 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 25,243 V Prep ROW 4% $ 25,243 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,933 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 31,554 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 220,880 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,554 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,554 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,622 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,865 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 410,206 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,041,293 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 208,259 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,250,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,250,000 Bonds: 5% $ 62,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 187,500 Mobilization 10% $ 125,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 187,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,813,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Creek View Dr to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,104 cy $ 16.91 $ 86,309 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,680 sy $ 11.70 $ 113,256 B8 Underseal 9,680 sy $ 6.46 $ 62,533 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,680 sy $ 18.99 $ 183,823 B13 lConcrete Median 6,336 sf $ 53.96 $ 341,891 D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,051,811 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,554 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 368,134 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,036 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,109 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 683,677 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,488 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,098 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 104,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 312,450 Mobilization 10% $ 208,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 312,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,020,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Frontier Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,785 cy $ 16.91 $ 97,816 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,971 sy $ 11.70 $ 128,357 B8 JUnderseal 10,971 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 70,871 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,971 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 208,333 B13 lConcrete Median 7,181 sf $ 53.96 $ 387,476 D4 ISidewalk 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,192,053 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 47,682 V Prep ROW 4% $ 47,682 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,762 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 59,603 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 417,218 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,603 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,603 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,841 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 71,523 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 774,834 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,966,887 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 393,377 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,361,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,361,000 Bonds: 5% $ 118,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 354,150 Mobilization 10% $ 236,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 354,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,423,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Frontier Dr to Haven Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,146 cy $ 16.91 $ 120,832 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 13,552 sy $ 11.70 $ 158,558 B8 JUnderseal 13,552 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 87,546 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 13,552 sy $ 18.99 $ 257,352 B13 lConcrete Median 8,870 sf $ 53.96 $ 478,647 D4 ISidewalk 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,472,536 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,901 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,901 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,176 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,627 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 515,387 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,627 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,627 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,451 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,352 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 957,148 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,429,684 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 485,937 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,916,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,916,000 Bonds: 5% $ 145,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 437,400 Mobilization 10% $ 291,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 437,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,228,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Haven Dr to PR E-W Segment 1 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,173 cy $ 16.91 $ 205,851 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,467 sy $ 11.70 $ 274,560 B8 Underseal 23,467 sy $ 6.46 $ 151,595 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,467 sy $ 18.99 $ 445,632 B13 lConcrete Median 13,200 sf $ 53.96 $ 712,272 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,229,910 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,196 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,196 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,897 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 111,495 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 780,468 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,598 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 133,795 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,849,441 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,079,351 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 815,870 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,896,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,896,000 Bonds: 5% $ 244,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 734,400 Mobilization 10% $ 489,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 734,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,099,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 2-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: PR E-W Segment 1 to PR E-W Segment 2 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,173 cy $ 16.91 $ 205,851 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,467 sy $ 11.70 $ 274,560 B8 Underseal 23,467 sy $ 6.46 $ 151,595 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,467 sy $ 18.99 $ 445,632 B13 lConcrete Median 13,200 sf $ 53.96 $ 712,272 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,229,910 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,196 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,196 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,897 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 111,495 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 780,468 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,598 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 133,795 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,849,441 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,079,351 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 815,870 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,896,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,896,000 Bonds: 5% $ 244,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 734,400 Mobilization 10% $ 489,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 734,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,099,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 2-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: PR E-W Segment 2 to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,391 cy $ 16.91 $ 226,436 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 302,016 B8 JUnderseal 25,813 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 166,754 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 490,195 B13 lConcrete Median 14,520 sf $ 53.96 $ 783,499 D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,452,901 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,116 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,116 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 73,587 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 122,645 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 858,515 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,058 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 147,174 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,994,385 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,447,286 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 889,457 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,337,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,337,000 Bonds: 5% $ 266,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 800,550 Mobilization 10% $ 533,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 800,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,739,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 2-P Project Number: 2-P This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Violet Rd to Widgeon Dr(N-S PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,270 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,550 cy $ 16.91 $ 93,848 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,343 sy $ 13.78 $ 142,526 B8 IUnderseal I 10,343 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 66,815 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,847 sy $ 5.65 $ 61,288 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,568 sy $ 50.00 $ 378,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 742,877 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,715 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,715 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,286 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 37,144 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 260,007 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,144 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,144 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,858 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,573 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 482,870 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,225,748 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 245,150 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,471,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,471,000 Bonds: 5% $ 73,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 220,650 Mobilization 10% $ 147,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 220,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,133,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info-rmatio'n""' Description: Project No. 2-Q Project Number: 2-Q This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Widgeon Dr(N-S PR Segment)to New PR Segment roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,323 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,679 cy $ 16.91 $ 96,031 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,583 sy $ 13.78 $ 145,840 B8 IUnderseal I 10,583 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 68,369 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 11,100 sy $ 5.65 $ 62,713 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,744 sy $ 50.00 $ 387,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 760,154 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 30,406 V Prep ROW 4% $ 30,406 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,805 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 38,008 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 266,054 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,008 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,008 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,203 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 45,609 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 494,100 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,254,253 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 250,851 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,506,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,506,000 Bonds: 5% $ 75,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 225,900 Mobilization 10% $ 150,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 225,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,184,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-rV , Description: Project No. 2-R Project Number: 2-11 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: New PR Segment to Warrior(PR N-S Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,388 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,206 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,178 sy $ 13.78 $ 112,695 B8 IUnderseal I 8,178 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 52,831 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,577 sy $ 5.65 $ 48,460 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 587,391 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,496 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,496 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,622 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,370 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 205,587 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,748 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,243 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 381,804 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 969,196 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 193,839 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,164,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,164,000 Bonds: 5% $ 58,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 174,600 Mobilization 10% $ 116,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 174,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,688,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 2-S Project Number: 2-S This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Warrior(PR N-S Segment)to McKinzie Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,744 cy $ 16.91 $ 130,951 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,432 sy $ 13.78 $ 198,873 B8 IUnderseal I 14,432 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 93,231 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 15,136 sy $ 5.65 $ 85,518 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,036,573 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 41,463 V Prep ROW 4% $ 41,463 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,097 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 51,829 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 362,801 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,829 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,829 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,731 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 62,194 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,073,773 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,110,346 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 422,069 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,533,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,533,000 Bonds: 5% $ 126,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 379,950 Mobilization 10% $ 253,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 379,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,673,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV ..... Description: Project No. 2-T Project Number: 2-T This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: City Limits to New PR Segment roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,901 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,125 cy $ 16.91 $ 103,570 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,616 sy $ 11.70 $ 135,907 B8 IUnderseal I 11,616 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 75,039 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,616 sy $ 18.99 $ 220,588 B13 lConcrete Median 7,603 sf $ 53.96 $ 410,269 D4 ISidewalk I 6,336 sy $ 50.00 $ 316,800 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,262,173 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 50,487 V Prep ROW 4% $ 50,487 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 37,865 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 63,109 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 441,761 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 63,109 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 63,109 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,243 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 75,730 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 820,413 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,082,586 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 416,517 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,500,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,500,000 Bonds: 5% $ 125,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 375,000 Mobilization 10% $ 250,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 375,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,625,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project Number: 2-U This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: New PR Segment to Warrior(PR N-S Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,785 cy $ 16.91 $ 97,816 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,971 sy $ 11.70 $ 128,357 B8 IUnderseal I 10,971 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 70,871 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,971 sy $ 18.99 $ 208,333 B13 lConcrete Median 7,181 sf $ 53.96 $ 387,476 D4 ISidewalk I 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,192,053 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 47,682 V Prep ROW 4% $ 47,682 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,762 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 59,603 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 417,218 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,603 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,603 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,841 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 71,523 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 774,834 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,966,887 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 393,377 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,361,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,361,000 Bonds: 5% $ 118,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 354,150 Mobilization 10% $ 236,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 354,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,423,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 2-V Project Number: 2-V This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Warrior(PR N-S Segment)to McKinzie Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 11,909 cy $ 16.91 $ 201,387 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,587 sy $ 11.70 $ 264,264 B8 IUnderseal I 22,587 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 145,910 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,587 sy $ 18.99 $ 428,921 B13 lConcrete Median 14,784 sf $ 53.96 $ 797,745 D4 ISidewalk I 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,454,226 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,169 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,169 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 73,627 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 122,711 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 858,979 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,711 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,711 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,085 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 147,254 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,995,247 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,449,473 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 889,895 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,340,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,340,000 Bonds: 5% $ 267,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 801,000 Mobilization 10% $ 534,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 801,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,743,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 2-W Project Number: 2-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Yellow Oak Ave(Constructed Section)to Starlite Ln(PR roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 158 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 387 cy $ 16.91 $ 6,548 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 722 sy $ 13.78 $ 9,944 B8 IUnderseal I 722 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 4,662 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 757 sy $ 5.65 $ 4,276 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 528 sy $ 50.00 $ 26,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 51,829 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 2,073 V Prep ROW 4% $ 2,073 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 1,555 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 2,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 18,140 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 2,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 2,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,037 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 3,110 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 33,689 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 85,517 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 17,103 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 103,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 103,000 Bonds: 5% $ 5,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 15,450 Mobilization 10% $ 10,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 15,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 149,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 2-X Project Number: 2-X This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Starlite Ln(PR E-W Segment)to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,637 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,001 cy $ 16.91 $ 67,658 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,457 sy $ 13.78 $ 102,751 B8 IUnderseal I 7,457 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 48,169 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,820 sy $ 5.65 $ 44,185 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,456 sy $ 50.00 $ 272,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 535,563 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,423 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,423 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,067 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,778 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 187,447 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,778 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,778 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,711 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 32,134 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 348,116 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 883,679 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 176,736 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,061,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,061,000 Bonds: 5% $ 53,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 159,150 Mobilization 10% $ 106,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 159,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,538,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 2-Y Project Number: 2-Y This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Starlite Ln(PR E-W Segment)to PR E-W Segment 3 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,637 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,001 cy $ 16.91 $ 67,658 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,457 sy $ 13.78 $ 102,751 B8 IUnderseal I 7,457 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 48,169 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,820 sy $ 5.65 $ 44,185 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,456 sy $ 50.00 $ 272,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 535,563 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,423 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,423 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,067 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,778 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 187,447 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,778 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,778 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,711 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 32,134 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 348,116 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 883,679 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 176,736 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,061,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,061,000 Bonds: 5% $ 53,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 159,150 Mobilization 10% $ 106,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 159,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,538,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 2-Z Project Number: 2-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: PR E-W Segment 3 to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 264 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 645 cy $ 16.91 $ 10,913 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 1,203 sy $ 13.78 $ 16,573 B8 IUnderseal I 1,203 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 7,769 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,261 sy $ 5.65 $ 7,127 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 880 sy $ 50.00 $ 44,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 86,381 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 3,455 V Prep ROW 4% $ 3,455 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 2,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 4,319 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 30,233 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 4,319 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 4,319 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,728 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 5,183 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 56,148 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 142,529 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 28,506 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 172,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 172,000 Bonds: 5% $ 8,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 25,800 Mobilization 10% $ 17,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 25,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 249,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 2-AA Project Number: 2-AA This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Widgeon Dr(Constructed Segment)to PR E-W Segmen roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 264 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 645 cy $ 16.91 $ 10,913 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 1,203 sy $ 13.78 $ 16,573 B8 IUnderseal I 1,203 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 7,769 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,261 sy $ 5.65 $ 7,127 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 880 sy $ 50.00 $ 44,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 86,381 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 3,455 V Prep ROW 4% $ 3,455 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 2,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 4,319 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 30,233 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 4,319 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 4,319 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,728 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 5,183 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 56,148 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 142,529 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 28,506 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 172,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 172,000 Bonds: 5% $ 8,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 25,800 Mobilization 10% $ 17,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 25,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 249,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 2-AB Project Number: 2-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: PR E-W Segment 1 to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,426 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,485 cy $ 16.91 $ 58,928 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,494 sy $ 13.78 $ 89,493 B8 IUnderseal I 6,494 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 41,954 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,811 sy $ 5.65 $ 38,483 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,752 sy $ 50.00 $ 237,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 466,458 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,658 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,658 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,994 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,323 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 163,260 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,323 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,323 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,329 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 27,987 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 303,198 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 769,656 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 153,931 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 924,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 924,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 138,600 Mobilization 10% $ 92,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 138,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,340,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 2-AC Project Number: 2-AC This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sunny Dr(Constructed Segment)to Haven Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,453 cy $ 16.91 $ 109,126 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,027 sy $ 13.78 $ 165,727 B8 IUnderseal I 12,027 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 77,692 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,613 sy $ 5.65 $ 71,265 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 863,811 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,552 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,552 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,914 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,191 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 302,334 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,191 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,191 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,276 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,829 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 961,477 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,825,288 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 365,058 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,191,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,191,000 Bonds: 5% $ 109,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 328,650 Mobilization 10% $ 219,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 328,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,177,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 2-AE Project Number: 2-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: PR E-W Segment 1 to PR E-W Segment 2 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,742 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,259 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,023 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,938 sy $ 13.78 $ 109,380 B8 IUnderseal I 7,938 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 51,277 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,325 sy $ 5.65 $ 47,035 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,808 sy $ 50.00 $ 290,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 570,115 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,805 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,805 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,103 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,506 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 199,540 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,506 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,506 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,402 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 34,207 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 370,575 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 940,690 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 188,138 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,129,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,129,000 Bonds: 5% $ 56,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 169,350 Mobilization 10% $ 112,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 169,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,637,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info_rmatfo_n "�,� Description: Project No. 2-AF Project Number: 2-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 100'E Dunstain St to Woodland Creek Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,690 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,130 cy $ 16.91 $ 69,841 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,697 sy $ 13.78 $ 106,066 B8 IUnderseal I 7,697 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 49,723 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,073 sy $ 5.65 $ 45,610 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,632 sy $ 50.00 $ 281,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 552,839 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,114 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,114 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,585 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 27,642 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 193,494 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,642 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,642 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,057 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,170 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 359,345 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 912,184 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 182,437 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,095,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,095,000 Bonds: 5% $ 54,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 164,250 Mobilization 10% $ 109,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 164,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,588,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,j, Description: Project No. 2-AG Project Number: 2-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Callicoatte Rd to Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,165 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,292 cy $ 16.91 $ 89,483 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,862 sy $ 13.78 $ 135,897 B8 IUnderseal I 9,862 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 63,708 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,343 sy $ 5.65 $ 58,438 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,216 sy $ 50.00 $ 360,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 708,325 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,333 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,333 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,250 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,416 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 247,914 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,416 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,416 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,166 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,499 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 460,411 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,168,736 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 233,747 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,403,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,403,000 Bonds: 5% $ 70,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 210,450 Mobilization 10% $ 140,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 210,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,034,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 2-AH Project Number: 2-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Yellow Oak Ave(PR N-S Segment)to Proposed N-S Segi roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,482 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,066 cy $ 16.91 $ 102,578 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 11,305 sy $ 13.78 $ 155,784 B8 IUnderseal I 11,305 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 73,031 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 11,857 sy $ 5.65 $ 66,989 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,272 sy $ 50.00 $ 413,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 811,982 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 32,479 V Prep ROW 4% $ 32,479 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,359 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 40,599 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 284,194 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,599 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,599 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,240 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 48,719 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 527,788 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,339,771 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 267,954 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,608,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,608,000 Bonds: 5% $ 80,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 241,200 Mobilization 10% $ 160,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 241,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,332,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 2-Al Project Number: 2-AI This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Proposed N-S Segment to Violet Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,267 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,098 cy $ 16.91 $ 52,380 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 5,773 sy $ 13.78 $ 79,549 B8 IUnderseal I 5,773 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 37,292 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,054 sy $ 5.65 $ 34,207 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,224 sy $ 50.00 $ 211,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 414,629 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 16,585 V Prep ROW 4% $ 16,585 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,439 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 20,731 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 145,120 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,731 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,731 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,293 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,878 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 269,509 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 684,138 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 136,828 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 821,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 821,000 Bonds: 5% $ 41,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 123,150 Mobilization 10% $ 82,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 123,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,190,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 2-AJ Project Number: 2-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Haven Dr to PR E-W Segment 1 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,227 cy $ 16.91 $ 54,563 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,013 sy $ 13.78 $ 82,864 B8 IUnderseal I 6,013 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 38,846 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,307 sy $ 5.65 $ 35,633 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 431,905 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,276 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,276 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,957 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 21,595 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 151,167 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,638 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,914 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 712,644 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 142,529 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 856,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 856,000 Bonds: 5% $ 42,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 128,400 Mobilization 10% $ 85,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 128,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,241,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 2-AK Project Number: 2-AK This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: PR E-W Segment 1 to PR E-W Segment 2 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,901 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,646 cy $ 16.91 $ 78,571 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,659 sy $ 13.78 $ 119,324 B8 IUnderseal I 8,659 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 55,938 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,082 sy $ 5.65 $ 51,311 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,336 sy $ 50.00 $ 316,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 621,944 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,878 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,878 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,658 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 31,097 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 217,680 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,097 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,097 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,439 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,317 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 404,264 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,026,207 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 205,241 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,232,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,232,000 Bonds: 5% $ 61,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 184,800 Mobilization 10% $ 123,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 184,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,786,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro-rmat Description: Project No. 2-AL Project Number: 2-AL This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Dunstain Rd to Sandy Hollow Creek Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,286 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,032 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,829 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,970 sy $ 13.78 $ 206,280 B8 IUnderseal I 14,970 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 96,703 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 15,700 sy $ 5.65 $ 88,704 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,953 sy $ 50.00 $ 547,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,075,183 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 43,007 V Prep ROW 4% $ 43,007 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 32,255 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 53,759 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 376,314 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,759 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,759 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,504 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 64,511 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,098,869 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,174,052 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 434,810 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,609,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,609,000 Bonds: 5% $ 130,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 391,350 Mobilization 10% $ 260,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 391,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,783,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project No. 2-AM Project Number: 2-AM This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: City Limits to Proposed N-S Segment roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,403 cy $ 16.91 $ 57,539 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,453 sy $ 11.70 $ 75,504 B8 IUnderseal I 6,453 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 41,689 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,453 sy $ 18.99 $ 122,549 B13 lConcrete Median 4,224 sf $ 53.96 $ 227,927 D4 ISidewalk I 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 701,207 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,048 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,048 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,036 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,060 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 245,423 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,060 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,060 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,024 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,072 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 455,785 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,156,992 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 231,398 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,389,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,389,000 Bonds: 5% $ 69,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 208,350 Mobilization 10% $ 138,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 208,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,014,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informafl•n. Description: Project Number: 2-AN This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Proposed N-S Segment to Violet Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,848 Service Area(s): Northwest 2 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,955 cy $ 16.91 $ 100,693 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,293 sy $ 11.70 $ 132,132 B8 IUnderseal I 11,293 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 72,955 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,293 sy $ 18.99 $ 214,460 B13 lConcrete Median 7,392 sf $ 53.96 $ 398,872 D4 ISidewalk I 6,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 308,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,227,113 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 49,085 V Prep ROW 4% $ 49,085 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,813 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 61,356 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 429,490 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,356 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,356 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,542 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 73,627 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 797,623 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,024,737 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 404,947 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,430,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,430,000 Bonds: 5% $ 121,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 364,500 Mobilization 10% $ 243,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 364,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,524,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rand Morgan Rd to 1425'W of N Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,510 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,530 cy $ 16.91 $ 127,332 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,223 sy $ 11.70 $ 166,413 B8 JUnderseal 14,223 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 91,883 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,223 sy $ 18.99 $ 270,101 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,367 sy $ 50.00 $ 418,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,074,062 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,962 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,962 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 32,222 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 53,703 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 375,922 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,703 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,703 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,481 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 64,444 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 698,141 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,772,203 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 354,441 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,127,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,127,000 Bonds: 5% $ 106,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 319,050 Mobilization 10% $ 212,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 319,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,084,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Up River Rd,140'N of IH 37 to IH 37 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 140 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 420 cy $ 16.91 $ 7,102 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 793 sy $ 11.70 $ 9,282 B8 JUnderseal 793 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 5,125 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 793 sy $ 18.99 $ 15,065 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 467 sy $ 50.00 $ 23,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 59,908 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 2,396 V Prep ROW 4% $ 2,396 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 1,797 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 2,995 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 20,968 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 2,995 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 2,995 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,198 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 3,594 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 38,940 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 98,848 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 19,770 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 119,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 119,000 Bonds: 5% $ 5,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 17,850 Mobilization 10% $ 11,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 17,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 173,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 37 to Up River Rd,180'S of IH 37 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 180 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 580 cy $ 16.91 $ 9,808 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,100 sy $ 11.70 $ 12,870 B8 JUnderseal 1,100 1 sy I $ 6.46 $ 7,106 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,100 1 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 20,889 B13 lConcrete Median 720 1 sf $ 53.96 $ 38,851 D4 ISidewalk 600 sy $ 50.00 $ 30,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 119,524 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 4,781 V Prep ROW 4% $ 4,781 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 3,586 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 5,976 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 41,833 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,976 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,976 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,390 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 7,171 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 77,691 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 197,215 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 39,443 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 237,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 237,000 Bonds: 5% $ 11,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 35,550 Mobilization 10% $ 23,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 35,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 344,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Up River Rd,180'S of IH 37 to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,965 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,554 cy $ 16.91 $ 161,556 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,119 sy $ 11.70 $ 211,998 B8 Underseal 18,119 sy $ 6.46 $ 117,052 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,119 sy $ 18.99 $ 344,088 B13 lConcrete Median 11,860 sf $ 53.96 $ 639,966 D4 ISidewalk 9,883 sy $ 50.00 $ 494,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,968,826 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 78,753 V Prep ROW 4% $ 78,753 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 59,065 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 98,441 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 689,089 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 98,441 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 98,441 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 39,377 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 118,130 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,679,737 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,648,563 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 729,713 Construction Cost TOT $ 4,379,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,379,000 Bonds: 5% $ 218,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 656,850 Mobilization 10% $ 437,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 656,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,350,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Oregon Trl roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,348 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,566 cy $ 16.91 $ 127,937 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,349 sy $ 11.70 $ 167,882 B8 JUnderseal 14,349 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 92,694 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,349 sy $ 18.99 $ 272,485 B13 lConcrete Median 9,392 sf $ 53.96 $ 506,792 D4 ISidewalk 7,827 sy $ 50.00 $ 391,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,559,124 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 62,365 V Prep ROW 4% $ 62,365 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,774 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 77,956 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 545,693 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,956 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,956 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,182 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 93,547 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,013,431 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,572,555 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 514,511 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,088,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,088,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,200 Mobilization 10% $ 308,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,478,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Oregon Trl to 1540'S of McNorton Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,643 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,739 cy $ 16.91 $ 198,510 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,264 sy $ 11.70 $ 260,489 B8 JUnderseal 22,264 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 143,825 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,264 sy $ 18.99 $ 422,793 B13 lConcrete Median 14,573 sf $ 53.96 $ 786,348 D4 ISidewalk 12,144 sy $ 50.00 $ 607,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,419,166 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 96,767 V Prep ROW 4% $ 96,767 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 72,575 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 120,958 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 846,708 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 120,958 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 120,958 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 48,383 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 145,150 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,972,458 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,391,624 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 878,325 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,270,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,270,000 Bonds: 5% $ 263,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 790,500 Mobilization 10% $ 527,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 790,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,642,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1540'S of McNorton Rd to 3565'S of McNorton Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,465 cy $ 16.91 $ 109,324 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,261 sy $ 11.70 $ 143,458 B8 JUnderseal 12,261 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 79,208 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,261 sy $ 18.99 $ 232,843 B13 lConcrete Median 8,026 sf $ 53.96 $ 433,061 D4 ISidewalk 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,332,294 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 53,292 V Prep ROW 4% $ 53,292 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,969 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 66,615 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 466,303 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,615 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,615 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,646 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,938 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 865,991 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,198,285 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 439,657 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,638,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,638,000 Bonds: 5% $ 131,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 395,700 Mobilization 10% $ 263,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 395,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,825,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 3565'S of McNorton Rd to 4785'S of McNorton Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,214 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,913 cy $ 16.91 $ 66,170 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,421 sy $ 11.70 $ 86,830 B8 JUnderseal 7,421 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 47,942 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,421 sy $ 18.99 $ 140,931 B13 lConcrete Median 4,858 sf $ 53.96 $ 262,116 D4 ISidewalk 4,048 sy $ 50.00 $ 202,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 806,389 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 32,256 V Prep ROW 4% $ 32,256 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,192 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 40,319 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 282,236 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,319 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,319 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,128 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 48,383 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 524,153 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,330,541 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 266,108 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,597,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,597,000 Bonds: 5% $ 79,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 239,550 Mobilization 10% $ 159,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 239,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,316,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 4785'S of McNorton Rd to 2650'N of Agnes St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,208 cy $ 16.91 $ 172,617 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,360 sy $ 11.70 $ 226,512 B8 JUnderseal 19,360 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 125,066 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,360 sy $ 18.99 $ 367,646 B13 lConcrete Median 12,672 sf $ 53.96 $ 683,781 D4 ISidewalk 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,103,622 Major Construction Component Allowances: III% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 84,145 V Prep ROW 4% $ 84,145 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 63,109 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 105,181 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 736,268 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,181 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,181 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,072 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 126,217 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,767,355 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,870,977 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 774,195 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,646,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,646,000 Bonds: 5% $ 232,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 696,900 Mobilization 10% $ 464,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 696,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,737,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 2650'N of Agnes St to Agnes St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy 1 $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy 1 $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to 3260'N of Sedwick Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 4,224 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 19,477 cy $ 16.91 $ 329,362 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 37,547 sy $ 11.70 $ 439,296 B8 Underseal 37,547 sy $ 6.46 $ 242,551 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 37,547 sy $ 18.99 $ 713,011 B13 lConcrete Median 21,120 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,139,635 D4 ISidewalk 14,080 sy $ 50.00 $ 704,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,567,856 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 142,714 V Prep ROW 4% $ 142,714 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 107,036 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 178,393 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,248,749 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 178,393 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 178,393 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 71,357 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 214,071 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,719,106 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,286,962 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,257,392 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,545,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,545,000 Bonds: 5% $ 377,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,131,750 Mobilization 10% $ 754,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,131,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,940,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 3260'N of Sedwick Rd to Sedwick Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,274 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 15,095 cy $ 16.91 $ 255,255 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 29,099 sy $ 11.70 $ 340,454 B8 JUnderseal 29,099 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 187,977 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 29,099 sy $ 18.99 $ 552,584 B13 lConcrete Median 16,368 sf $ 53.96 $ 883,217 D4 ISidewalk 10,912 sy $ 50.00 $ 545,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,765,088 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 110,604 V Prep ROW 4% $ 110,604 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 82,953 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 138,254 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 967,781 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 138,254 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 138,254 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 55,302 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 165,905 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,197,307 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,962,395 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 992,479 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,955,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,955,000 Bonds: 5% $ 297,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 893,250 Mobilization 10% $ 595,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 893,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,635,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sedwick Rd to Alpine St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,693 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,418 cy $ 16.91 $ 209,984 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,938 sy $ 11.70 $ 280,072 B8 JUnderseal 23,938 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 154,638 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,938 sy $ 18.99 $ 454,578 B13 lConcrete Median 13,465 sf $ 53.96 $ 726,571 D4 ISidewalk 8,977 sy $ 50.00 $ 448,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,274,677 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 90,987 V Prep ROW 4% $ 90,987 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 68,240 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 113,734 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 796,137 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,734 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,734 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 45,494 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 136,481 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,878,540 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,153,217 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 830,643 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,984,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,984,000 Bonds: 5% $ 249,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 747,600 Mobilization 10% $ 498,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 747,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,227,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Alpine St to 1070'S of Alpine St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,869 cy $ 16.91 $ 82,340 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,387 sy $ 11.70 $ 109,824 B8 JUnderseal 9,387 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 60,638 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,387 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 178,253 B13 lConcrete Median 5,280 sf $ 53.96 $ 284,909 D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 891,964 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,679 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,679 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,759 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,598 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 312,187 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,598 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,598 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,839 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,518 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 579,777 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,471,740 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 294,348 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,767,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,767,000 Bonds: 5% $ 88,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 265,050 Mobilization 10% $ 176,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 265,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,562,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 3-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Agnes St to TX 44 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,344 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,197 cy $ 16.91 $ 104,797 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,947 sy $ 11.70 $ 139,776 B8 JUnderseal 11,947 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 77,175 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,947 sy $ 18.99 $ 226,867 B13 lConcrete Median 6,720 sf $ 53.96 $ 362,611 D4 ISidewalk 4,480 sy $ 50.00 $ 224,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,135,227 Major Construction Component Allowances: _.::::ii W Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 45,409 V Prep ROW 4% $ 45,409 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 34,057 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 56,761 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 397,329 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,761 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,761 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,705 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 68,114 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 737,897 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,873,124 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 374,625 Construction Cost TOT $ 2,248,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,248,000 Bonds: 5% $ 112,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 337,200 Mobilization 10% $ 224,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 337,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,260,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: TX 44 to CR 36 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 4,024 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 18,555 cy $ 16.91 $ 313,767 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 35,769 sy $ 11.70 $ 418,496 B8 JUnderseal 35,769 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 231,067 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 35,769 sy $ 18.99 $ 679,251 B13 lConcrete Median 20,120 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,085,675 D4 ISidewalk 13,413 sy $ 50.00 $ 670,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,398,923 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 135,957 V Prep ROW 4% $ 135,957 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 101,968 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 169,946 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,189,623 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 169,946 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 169,946 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 67,978 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 203,935 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,609,300 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,008,223 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,201,645 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,210,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,210,000 Bonds: 5% $ 360,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,081,500 Mobilization 10% $ 721,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,081,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,455,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 3-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: CR 36 to McGloin Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,289 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,555 cy $ 16.91 $ 178,482 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,347 sy $ 11.70 $ 238,056 B8 JUnderseal 20,347 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 131,439 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,347 sy $ 18.99 $ 386,383 B13 lConcrete Median 11,445 sf $ 53.96 $ 617,572 D4 ISidewalk 7,630 sy $ 50.00 $ 381,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,933,433 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 77,337 V Prep ROW 4% $ 77,337 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 58,003 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 96,672 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 676,702 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 96,672 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 96,672 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 38,669 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 116,006 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,256,732 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,190,165 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 638,033 Construction Cost TOT $ 3,829,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,829,000 Bonds: 5% $ 191,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 574,350 Mobilization 10% $ 382,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 574,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,552,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-11 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Gaviota St to S Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,762 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,307 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,833 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,027 sy $ 13.78 $ 110,611 B8 JUnderseal 8,027 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 51,854 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 8,418 sy $ 5.65 $ 47,564 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,873 sy $ 50.00 $ 293,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 576,528 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,061 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,061 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,296 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,826 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 201,785 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,826 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,826 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,531 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 34,592 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 374,743 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 951,272 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 190,254 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,142,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,142,000 Bonds: 5% $ 57,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 171,300 Mobilization 10% $ 114,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 171,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,656,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-S This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Creek View Dr to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,104 cy $ 16.91 $ 86,309 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,680 sy $ 11.70 $ 113,256 B8 Underseal 9,680 sy $ 6.46 $ 62,533 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,680 sy $ 18.99 $ 183,823 B13 lConcrete Median 6,336 sf $ 53.96 $ 341,891 D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,051,811 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,554 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 368,134 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,036 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,109 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 683,677 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,488 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,098 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 104,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 312,450 Mobilization 10% $ 208,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 312,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,020,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-T This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Frontier Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,785 cy $ 16.91 $ 97,816 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,971 sy $ 11.70 $ 128,357 B8 JUnderseal 10,971 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 70,871 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,971 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 208,333 B13 lConcrete Median 7,181 sf $ 53.96 $ 387,476 D4 ISidewalk 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,192,053 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 47,682 V Prep ROW 4% $ 47,682 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,762 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 59,603 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 417,218 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,603 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,603 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,841 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 71,523 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 774,834 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,966,887 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 393,377 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,361,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,361,000 Bonds: 5% $ 118,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 354,150 Mobilization 10% $ 236,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 354,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,423,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-U This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Frontier Dr to Haven Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,146 cy $ 16.91 $ 120,832 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 13,552 sy $ 11.70 $ 158,558 B8 JUnderseal 13,552 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 87,546 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 13,552 sy $ 18.99 $ 257,352 B13 lConcrete Median 8,870 sf $ 53.96 $ 478,647 D4 ISidewalk 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,472,536 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,901 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,901 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,176 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,627 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 515,387 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,627 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,627 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,451 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,352 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 957,148 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,429,684 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 485,937 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,916,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,916,000 Bonds: 5% $ 145,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 437,400 Mobilization 10% $ 291,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 437,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,228,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-V This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Haven Dr to PR E-W Segment 1 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,173 cy $ 16.91 $ 205,851 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,467 sy $ 11.70 $ 274,560 B8 Underseal 23,467 sy $ 6.46 $ 151,595 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,467 sy $ 18.99 $ 445,632 B13 lConcrete Median 13,200 sf $ 53.96 $ 712,272 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,229,910 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,196 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,196 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,897 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 111,495 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 780,468 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,598 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 133,795 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,849,441 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,079,351 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 815,870 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,896,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,896,000 Bonds: 5% $ 244,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 734,400 Mobilization 10% $ 489,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 734,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,099,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-W This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: PR E-W Segment 1 to PR E-W Segment 2 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,173 cy $ 16.91 $ 205,851 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,467 sy $ 11.70 $ 274,560 B8 Underseal 23,467 sy $ 6.46 $ 151,595 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,467 sy $ 18.99 $ 445,632 B13 lConcrete Median 13,200 sf $ 53.96 $ 712,272 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,229,910 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,196 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,196 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,897 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 111,495 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 780,468 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,495 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,598 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 133,795 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,849,441 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,079,351 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 815,870 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,896,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,896,000 Bonds: 5% $ 244,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 734,400 Mobilization 10% $ 489,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 734,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,099,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-X This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: PR E-W Segment 2 to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,391 cy $ 16.91 $ 226,436 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 302,016 B8 JUnderseal 25,813 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 166,754 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 490,195 B13 lConcrete Median 14,520 sf $ 53.96 $ 783,499 D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,452,901 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,116 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,116 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 73,587 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 122,645 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 858,515 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,058 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 147,174 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,994,385 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,447,286 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 889,457 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,337,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,337,000 Bonds: 5% $ 266,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 800,550 Mobilization 10% $ 533,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 800,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,739,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 3-Y Project Number: 3-Y This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: McKinzie Rd to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 6,072 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 14,843 cy $ 16.91 $ 250,989 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 27,661 sy $ 13.78 $ 381,173 B8 IUnderseal I 27,661 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 178,692 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 29,011 sy $ 5.65 $ 163,910 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 20,240 sy $ 50.00 $ 1,012,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,986,765 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 79,471 V Prep ROW 4% $ 79,471 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 59,603 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 99,338 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 695,368 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,338 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,338 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 39,735 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 119,206 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,091,397 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,078,162 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 815,632 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,894,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,894,000 Bonds: 5% $ 244,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 734,100 Mobilization 10% $ 489,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 734,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,096,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Leopard St to Haven Dr(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,531 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,594 cy $ 16.91 $ 77,678 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,677 sy $ 11.70 $ 101,519 B8 IUnderseal I 8,677 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 56,052 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,677 sy $ 18.99 $ 164,772 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,104 sy $ 50.00 $ 255,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 655,221 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,209 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,209 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,657 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 32,761 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 229,327 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,761 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,761 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,104 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,313 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 425,894 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,081,114 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 216,223 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,298,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,298,000 Bonds: 5% $ 64,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 194,700 Mobilization 10% $ 129,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 194,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,882,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-AA This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Haven Dr(PR Segment)to Oregon Trail(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,690 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,069 cy $ 16.91 $ 85,713 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,574 sy $ 11.70 $ 112,020 B8 IUnderseal I 9,574 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 61,851 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,574 sy $ 18.99 $ 181,818 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,632 sy $ 50.00 $ 281,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 723,002 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,920 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,920 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,690 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,150 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 253,051 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,150 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,150 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,460 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 43,380 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 469,952 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,192,954 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 238,591 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,432,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,432,000 Bonds: 5% $ 71,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 214,800 Mobilization 10% $ 143,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 214,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,076,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'ki, �fi' Description: Project No. 3-AB Project Number: 3-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Oregon Trail(PR Segment)to E-W PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,270 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,811 cy $ 16.91 $ 115,177 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,866 sy $ 11.70 $ 150,528 B8 IUnderseal I 12,866 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 83,112 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,866 sy $ 18.99 $ 244,318 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,568 sy $ 50.00 $ 378,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 971,534 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 38,861 V Prep ROW 4% $ 38,861 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,146 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 48,577 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 340,037 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,577 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,577 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,431 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,292 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 631,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,603,032 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 320,606 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,924,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,924,000 Bonds: 5% $ 96,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 288,600 Mobilization 10% $ 192,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 288,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,790,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 3-AC Project Number: 3-AC This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: E-W PR Roadway 1 to E-W PR Roadway 2 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,485 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,454 cy $ 16.91 $ 176,784 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,747 sy $ 11.70 $ 231,042 B8 IUnderseal I 19,747 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 127,567 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,747 sy $ 18.99 $ 374,999 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 11,616 sy $ 50.00 $ 580,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,491,192 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 59,648 V Prep ROW 4% $ 59,648 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,736 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 74,560 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 521,917 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 74,560 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 74,560 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,824 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 89,472 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,369,275 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,860,467 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 572,093 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,433,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,433,000 Bonds: 5% $ 171,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 514,950 Mobilization 10% $ 343,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 514,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,978,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 3-AD This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: E-W PR Roadway 2 to Sedwick Rd(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,214 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,643 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,607 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,882 sy $ 11.70 $ 80,515 B8 IUnderseal I 6,882 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 44,455 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,882 sy $ 18.99 $ 130,682 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,048 sy $ 50.00 $ 202,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 519,658 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,786 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,786 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,590 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,983 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 181,880 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,983 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,983 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,393 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,179 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 337,778 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 857,436 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 171,487 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,029,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,029,000 Bonds: 5% $ 51,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 154,350 Mobilization 10% $ 102,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 154,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,492,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 3-AE Project Number: 3-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sedwick Rd(PR Segment)to Alpine St(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,432 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,296 cy $ 16.91 $ 174,105 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,448 sy $ 11.70 $ 227,542 B8 IUnderseal I 19,448 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 125,634 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,448 sy $ 18.99 $ 369,318 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 11,440 sy $ 50.00 $ 572,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,468,599 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,744 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,744 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,058 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,430 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 514,009 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,430 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,430 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,372 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,116 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,354,589 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,823,188 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 564,638 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,388,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,388,000 Bonds: 5% $ 169,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 508,200 Mobilization 10% $ 338,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 508,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,913,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 3-AF Project Number: 3-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: McKinzie Rd to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 5,544 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 13,552 cy $ 16.91 $ 229,164 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 25,256 sy $ 13.78 $ 348,028 B8 IUnderseal I 25,256 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 163,154 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 26,488 sy $ 5.65 $ 149,657 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 18,480 sy $ 50.00 $ 924,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,814,003 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 72,560 V Prep ROW 4% $ 72,560 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 54,420 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 90,700 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 634,901 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,700 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,700 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 36,280 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 108,840 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,979,102 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,793,105 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 758,621 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,552,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,552,000 Bonds: 5% $ 227,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 682,800 Mobilization 10% $ 455,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 682,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,600,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info-rmatfo-n- Description: Project No. 3-AG Project Number: 3-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N-S PR Roadway 1 to Oregon Trail(Constructed Segme roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,936 cy $ 16.91 $ 32,738 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,608 sy $ 13.78 $ 49,718 B8 IUnderseal I 3,608 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 23,308 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,784 sy $ 5.65 $ 21,380 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 259,143 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,366 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,366 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,774 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 12,957 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 90,700 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,957 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,957 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,183 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,549 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 168,443 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 427,586 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 85,517 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 514,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 514,000 Bonds: 5% $ 25,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 77,100 Mobilization 10% $ 51,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 77,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 745,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 3-AH Project Number: 3-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: McKinzie Rd to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 5,280 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 17,013 cy $ 16.91 $ 287,695 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 32,267 sy $ 11.70 $ 377,520 B8 IUnderseal I 32,267 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 208,443 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 32,267 sy $ 18.99 $ 612,744 B13 lConcrete Median 21,120 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,139,635 D4 ISidewalk I 17,600 sy $ 50.00 $ 880,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,506,037 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 140,241 V Prep ROW 4% $ 140,241 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 105,181 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 175,302 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,227,113 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 175,302 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 175,302 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 70,121 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 210,362 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,078,924 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,584,962 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,316,992 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,902,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,902,000 Bonds: 5% $ 395,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,185,300 Mobilization 10% $ 790,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 1,185,300 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,458,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information-'k* Description: Project No. 3-Al Project Number: 3-AI This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Rand Morgan Rd to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 IUnderseal I 16,133 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk I 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,121 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'ki, A?W1 Description: Project No. 3-AJ Project Number: 3-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: FM 2292 to N Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,802 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 12,250 cy $ 16.91 $ 207,141 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,232 sy $ 11.70 $ 271,814 B8 IUnderseal I 23,232 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 150,079 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,232 sy $ 18.99 $ 441,176 B13 lConcrete Median 15,206 sf $ 53.96 $ 820,537 D4 ISidewalk I 12,672 sy $ 50.00 $ 633,600 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,524,347 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 100,974 V Prep ROW 4% $ 100,974 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 75,730 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 126,217 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 883,521 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 126,217 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 126,217 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 50,487 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 151,461 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,040,825 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,565,172 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 913,034 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,479,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,479,000 Bonds: 5% $ 273,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 821,850 Mobilization 10% $ 547,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 821,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,945,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 3-AK Project Number: 3-AK This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Roadway Limits to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,421 cy $ 16.91 $ 91,666 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,102 sy $ 13.78 $ 139,211 B8 IUnderseal I 10,102 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 65,262 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,595 sy $ 5.65 $ 59,863 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 725,601 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,024 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,024 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,768 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,280 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 253,960 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,280 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,280 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,512 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 43,536 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 471,641 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,197,242 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 239,448 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,437,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,437,000 Bonds: 5% $ 71,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 215,550 Mobilization 10% $ 143,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 215,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,084,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info_rmatfo_n 'k� Description: Project No. 3-AL Project Number: 3-AL This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N-S PR Roadway 1 to FM 2292 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,534 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,195 cy $ 16.91 $ 104,761 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 11,546 sy $ 13.78 $ 159,098 B8 IUnderseal I 11,546 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 74,585 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,109 sy $ 5.65 $ 68,415 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,448 sy $ 50.00 $ 422,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 829,258 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,170 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,170 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,878 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 41,463 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 290,240 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,463 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,463 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,585 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 49,756 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 539,018 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,368,277 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 273,655 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,642,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,642,000 Bonds: 5% $ 82,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 246,300 Mobilization 10% $ 164,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 246,300 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,381,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV ....... Description: Project No. 3-AM Project Number: 3-AM This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: City Limits to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 3,274 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 12,367 cy $ 16.91 $ 209,125 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,643 sy $ 11.70 $ 276,619 B8 IUnderseal I 23,643 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 152,732 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,643 sy $ 18.99 $ 448,974 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,912 sy $ 50.00 $ 545,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,633,050 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 65,322 V Prep ROW 4% $ 65,322 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 48,991 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 81,652 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 571,567 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,652 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,652 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 32,661 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 97,983 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,461,482 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,094,532 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 618,906 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,714,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,714,000 Bonds: 5% $ 185,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 557,100 Mobilization 10% $ 371,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 557,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,385,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV Description: Project No. 3-AN Project Number: 3-AN This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N-S PR Roadway 1 to FM 2292 roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,376 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,976 cy $ 16.91 $ 151,784 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,160 sy $ 11.70 $ 200,772 B8 IUnderseal I 17,160 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 110,854 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,160 sy $ 18.99 $ 325,868 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,920 sy $ 50.00 $ 396,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,185,278 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 47,411 V Prep ROW 4% $ 47,411 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,558 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 59,264 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 414,847 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,264 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,264 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,706 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 71,117 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 770,431 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,955,709 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 391,142 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,347,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,347,000 Bonds: 5% $ 117,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 352,050 Mobilization 10% $ 234,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 352,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,403,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatro_n, "--�,, A?W1 Description: Project No. 3-AO Project Number: 3-AO This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: FM 2292 to N Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 3,802 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 14,362 cy $ 16.91 $ 242,855 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,456 sy $ 11.70 $ 321,235 B8 IUnderseal I 27,456 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 177,366 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,456 sy $ 18.99 $ 521,389 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 12,672 sy $ 50.00 $ 633,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,896,445 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 75,858 V Prep ROW 4% $ 75,858 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 56,893 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 94,822 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 663,756 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 94,822 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 94,822 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 37,929 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 113,787 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,632,689 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,529,134 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 705,827 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,235,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,235,000 Bonds: 5% $ 211,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 635,250 Mobilization 10% $ 423,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 635,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,141,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- A' Project Number: 3-AP This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: City Limits to N-S PR Roadway 1 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 845 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,112 cy $ 16.91 $ 35,714 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,942 sy $ 11.70 $ 46,126 B8 IUnderseal I 3,942 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 25,468 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,942 sy $ 18.99 $ 74,866 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,816 sy $ 50.00 $ 140,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 322,974 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,919 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,919 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,689 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 16,149 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 113,041 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,149 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,149 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,459 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 19,378 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 209,933 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 532,907 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 106,581 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 640,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 640,000 Bonds: 5% $ 32,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 96,000 Mobilization 10% $ 64,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 96,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 928,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project ,o • ■ 0 Project Number: 3-AQ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N-S PR Roadway 1 to FM 2292 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 1,172 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,930 cy $ 16.91 $ 49,546 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,469 sy $ 11.70 $ 63,991 B8 IUnderseal I 5,469 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 35,332 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,469 sy $ 18.99 $ 103,863 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,907 sy $ 50.00 $ 195,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 448,065 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,923 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,923 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,442 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,403 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 156,823 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,403 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,403 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,961 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 26,884 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 291,242 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 739,308 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 147,862 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 888,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 888,000 Bonds: 5% $ 44,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 133,200 Mobilization 10% $ 88,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 133,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,288,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information-'k* Description: Project No. 3-AR Project Number: 3-AR This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: FM 2292 to N Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 3,960 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,900 cy $ 16.91 $ 167,409 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,480 sy $ 11.70 $ 216,216 B8 IUnderseal I 18,480 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 119,381 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,480 sy $ 18.99 $ 350,935 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 13,200 sy $ 50.00 $ 660,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,513,941 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 60,558 V Prep ROW 4% $ 60,558 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 45,418 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 75,697 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 529,879 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 75,697 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 75,697 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 30,279 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 90,836 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,384,062 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,898,003 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 579,601 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,478,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,478,000 Bonds: 5% $ 173,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 521,700 Mobilization 10% $ 347,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 521,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,043,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • • • Description: Project Number: 3-AS This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1070'S of Alpine St to CR 44 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,491 Service Area(s): Northwest 3 Description New Project Roadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 11,486 cy $ 16.91 $ 194,233 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,142 sy $ 11.70 $ 259,064 B8 IUnderseal I 22,142 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 143,039 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,142 sy $ 18.99 $ 420,481 B13 lConcrete Median 12,455 sf $ 53.96 $ 672,072 D4 ISidewalk I 8,303 sy $ 50.00 $ 415,167 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,104,055 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 84,162 V Prep ROW 4% $ 84,162 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 63,122 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 105,203 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 736,419 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,203 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,203 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,081 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 126,243 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,367,636 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,471,691 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 694,338 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,167,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,167,000 Bonds: 5% $ 208,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 625,050 Mobilization 10% $ 416,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 625,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,042,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Corn Products Rd to Benys Rd/N Lexington Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,680 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,636 cy $ 16.91 $ 146,027 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,378 sy $ 11.70 $ 191,620 B8 JUnderseal 16,378 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 105,800 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,378 sy $ 18.99 $ 311,014 B13 lConcrete Median 10,720 sf $ 53.96 $ 578,451 D4 ISidewalk 8,933 sy $ 50.00 $ 446,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,779,580 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,183 V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,183 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,387 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 88,979 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 622,853 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,979 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,979 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,592 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,775 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,556,727 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,336,306 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 667,261 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,0041 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,004,000 Bonds: 5% $ 200,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 600,600 Mobilization 10% $ 400,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 600,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,806,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Benys Rd/N Lexington Blvd to Lantana St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,706 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,719 cy $ 16.91 $ 147,444 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,537 sy $ 11.70 $ 193,479 B8 JUnderseal 16,537 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 106,827 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,537 sy $ 18.99 $ 314,031 B13 lConcrete Median 10,824 sf $ 53.96 $ 584,063 D4 ISidewalk 9,020 sy $ 50.00 $ 451,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,796,844 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,874 V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,874 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,905 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 89,842 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 628,895 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,842 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,842 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,937 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 107,811 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,567,949 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,364,793 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 672,959 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,038,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,038,000 Bonds: 5% $ 201,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 605,700 Mobilization 10% $ 403,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 605,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,855,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lantana St to N Padre Island Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 782 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,520 cy $ 16.91 $ 42,609 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,779 sy $ 11.70 $ 55,913 B8 Underseal 4,779 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 30,872 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,779 sy $ 18.99 $ 90,751 B13 lConcrete Median 3,128 sf $ 53.96 $ 168,787 D4 ISidewalk 2,607 sy $ 50.00 $ 130,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 519,265 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,771 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,771 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,578 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,963 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 181,743 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,963 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,963 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,385 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,156 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 337,522 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 856,788 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 171,358 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,029,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,029,000 Bonds: 5% $ 51,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 154,350 Mobilization 10% $ 102,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 154,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,492,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Clarkwood Rd to Manning Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 4,165 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 15,734 cy $ 16.91 $ 266,069 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 30,081 sy $ 11.70 $ 351,943 B8 JUnderseal 30,081 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 194,320 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 30,081 sy $ 18.99 $ 571,230 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,883 sy $ 50.00 $ 694,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,077,729 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 83,109 V Prep ROW 4% $ 83,109 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 62,332 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 103,886 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 727,205 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 103,886 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 103,886 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 41,555 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 124,664 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,750,524 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,828,252 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 765,650 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,594,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,594,000 Bonds: 5% $ 229,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 689,100 Mobilization 10% $ 459,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 689,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,661,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • • • Description: Project Number: 4-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Manning Rd to Rhew Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,045 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project ... No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,726 cy $ 16.91 $ 130,639 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,769 sy $ 11.70 $ 172,803 B8 Underseal 14,769 sy $ 6.46 $ 95,411 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,769 sy $ 18.99 $ 280,472 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,817 sy $ 50.00 $ 340,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,020,157 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,806 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,806 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,605 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 51,008 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 357,055 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,008 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,008 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,403 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 61,209 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 663,102 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,683,260 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 336,652 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,020,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,020,000 Bonds: 5% $ 101,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 303,000 Mobilization 10% $ 202,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 303,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,929,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rhew Rd to Southern Minerals Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 4,547 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 17,178 cy $ 16.91 $ 290,472 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 32,839 sy $ 11.70 $ 384,222 B8 JUnderseal 32,839 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 212,143 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 32,839 sy $ 18.99 $ 623,621 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 15,157 sy $ 50.00 $ 757,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,268,291 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 90,732 V Prep ROW 4% $ 90,732 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 68,049 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 113,415 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 793,902 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,415 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,415 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 45,366 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 136,097 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,874,389 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,142,680 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 828,536 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,972,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,972,000 Bonds: 5% $ 248,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 745,800 Mobilization 10% $ 497,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 745,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,209,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Clarkwood Rd to Manning Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,161 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,171 cy $ 16.91 $ 171,997 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 18,956 sy $ 13.78 $ 261,209 B8 JUnderseal 18,956 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 122,454 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 19,880 sy $ 5.65 $ 112,324 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,870 sy $ 50.00 $ 693,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,361,484 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 54,459 V Prep ROW 4% $ 54,459 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 40,845 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 68,074 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 476,519 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,074 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,074 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,230 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,689 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,284,964 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,646,448 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 529,290 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,176,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,176,000 Bonds: 5% $ 158,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 476,400 Mobilization 10% $ 317,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 476,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,605,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Railroad to Corn Products Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,699 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,097 cy $ 16.91 $ 136,920 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,294 sy $ 11.70 $ 178,944 B8 Underseal 15,294 sy $ 6.46 $ 98,801 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,294 sy $ 18.99 $ 290,439 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,997 sy $ 50.00 $ 449,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,154,938 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,198 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,198 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 34,648 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 57,747 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 404,228 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,747 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,747 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,099 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 69,296 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,150,710 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,305,648 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 461,130 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,767,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,767,000 Bonds: 5% $ 138,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 415,050 Mobilization 10% $ 276,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 415,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,012,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Corn Products Rd to N Lexington Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 5,318 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 15,954 cy $ 16.91 $ 269,782 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 30,135 sy $ 11.70 $ 352,583 B8 JUnderseal 30,135 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 194,674 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 30,135 sy $ 18.99 $ 572,270 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 17,727 sy $ 50.00 $ 886,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,275,643 Major Construction Component Allowances: I%: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 91,026 V Prep ROW 4% $ 91,026 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 68,269 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 113,782 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 796,475 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,782 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,782 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 45,513 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 136,539 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,279,168 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,554,811 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 910,962 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,466,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,466,000 Bonds: 5% $ 273,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 819,900 Mobilization 10% $ 546,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 819,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,926,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Alpine St to Sedwick Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,678 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,546 cy $ 16.91 $ 110,697 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,200 sy $ 13.78 $ 168,113 B8 JUnderseal 12,200 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 78,811 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 12,795 sy $ 5.65 $ 72,291 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,927 sy $ 50.00 $ 446,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 876,245 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,050 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,050 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,287 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,812 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 306,686 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,812 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,812 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,525 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,575 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 969,559 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,845,804 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 369,161 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,215,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,215,000 Bonds: 5% $ 110,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 332,250 Mobilization 10% $ 221,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 332,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,212,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sedwick Rd to 870'S of Caroline Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,270 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,993 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,167 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,897 sy $ 13.78 $ 205,276 B8 JUnderseal 14,897 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 96,232 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 15,623 sy $ 5.65 $ 88,272 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 10,900 sy $ 50.00 $ 545,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,069,948 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,798 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,798 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 32,098 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 53,497 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 374,482 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,497 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 53,497 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,399 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 64,197 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,095,466 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,165,414 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 433,083 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,599,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,599,000 Bonds: 5% $ 129,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 389,850 Mobilization 10% $ 259,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 389,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,769,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 870'S of Caroline Rd to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,250 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,389 cy $ 16.91 $ 175,676 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 19,361 sy $ 13.78 $ 266,796 B8 JUnderseal 19,361 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 125,073 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 20,306 sy $ 5.65 $ 114,726 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 14,167 sy $ 50.00 $ 708,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,390,605 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 55,624 V Prep ROW 4% $ 55,624 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 41,718 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 69,530 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 486,712 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,530 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,530 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,812 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 83,436 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,303,893 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,694,498 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 538,900 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,2341 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,234,000 Bonds: 5% $ 161,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 485,100 Mobilization 10% $ 323,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 485,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,689,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to IH 37 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,402 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,872 cy $ 16.91 $ 99,288 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,942 sy $ 13.78 $ 150,787 B8 JUnderseal 10,942 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 70,688 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 11,476 sy $ 5.65 $ 64,841 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,007 sy $ 50.00 $ 400,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 785,937 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 31,437 V Prep ROW 4% $ 31,437 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 23,578 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 39,297 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 275,078 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,297 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,297 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,719 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 47,156 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 510,859 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,296,796 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 259,359 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,557,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,557,000 Bonds: 5% $ 77,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 233,550 Mobilization 10% $ 155,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 233,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,258,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 37 to Up River Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,120 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,738 cy $ 16.91 $ 46,296 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 5,102 sy $ 13.78 $ 70,309 B8 JUnderseal 5,102 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 32,960 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 5,351 sy $ 5.65 $ 30,234 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,733 sy $ 50.00 $ 186,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 366,465 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 14,659 V Prep ROW 4% $ 14,659 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,994 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 18,323 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 128,263 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,323 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,323 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,329 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,988 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 238,202 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 604,668 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 120,934 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 726,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 726,000 Bonds: 5% $ 36,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 108,900 Mobilization 10% $ 72,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 108,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,053,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 4-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 970'West of N Clarkwood Rd to N Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 970 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,910 cy $ 16.91 $ 49,208 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,497 sy $ 11.70 $ 64,311 B8 JUnderseal 5,497 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 35,508 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,497 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 104,382 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,233 sy $ 50.00 $ 161,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 415,076 Major Construction Component Allowances: a Item Description Notes Allowance f Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 16,603 V Prep ROW 4% $ 16,603 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,452 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 20,754 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 145,277 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,754 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,754 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,302 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,905 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 269,799 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 684,875 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 136,975 Construction Cost TOT $ 822,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 822,000 Bonds: 5% $ 41,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 123,300 Mobilization 10% $ 82,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 123,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,192,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Clarkwood Rd to 1110'East of N Clarkwood Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,110 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,330 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,310 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,290 sy $ 11.70 $ 73,593 B8 JUnderseal 6,290 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 40,633 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,290 sy $ 18.99 $ 119,447 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,700 sy $ 50.00 $ 185,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 474,984 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,999 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,999 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,250 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,749 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 166,244 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,749 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,749 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,500 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,499 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 308,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 783,723 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 156,745 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 941,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 941,000 Bonds: 5% $ 47,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 141,150 Mobilization 10% $ 94,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 141,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,364,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 4-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Up River Rd to IH 37 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,244 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,008 cy $ 16.91 $ 67,783 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,602 sy $ 11.70 $ 88,946 B8 JUnderseal 7,602 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 49,110 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,602 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 144,366 B13 lConcrete Median 4,976 sf $ 53.96 $ 268,505 D4 ISidewalk 4,147 sy $ 50.00 $ 207,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 826,044 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,042 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,042 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,781 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 41,302 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 289,115 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,302 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,302 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,521 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 49,563 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 536,928 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,362,972 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 272,594 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,636,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,636,000 Bonds: 5% $ 81,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 245,400 Mobilization 10% $ 163,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 245,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,372,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-11 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 37 to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,444 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,875 cy $ 16.91 $ 133,168 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,936 sy $ 11.70 $ 174,746 B8 JUnderseal 14,936 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 96,484 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,936 sy $ 18.99 $ 283,626 B13 lConcrete Median 9,776 sf $ 53.96 $ 527,513 D4 ISidewalk 8,147 sy $ 50.00 $ 407,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,622,870 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 64,915 V Prep ROW 4% $ 64,915 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 48,686 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 81,144 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 568,005 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,144 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,144 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 32,457 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 97,372 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,054,866 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,677,736 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 535,547 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,2141 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,214,000 Bonds: 5% $ 160,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 482,100 Mobilization 10% $ 321,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 482,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,660,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-S This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Up River Rd to IH 37 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,601 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,381 cy $ 16.91 $ 141,723 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,895 sy $ 11.70 $ 185,972 B8 JUnderseal 15,895 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 102,682 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,895 sy $ 18.99 $ 301,846 B13 lConcrete Median 10,404 sf $ 53.96 $ 561,400 D4 ISidewalk 8,670 sy $ 50.00 $ 433,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,727,122 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 69,085 V Prep ROW 4% $ 69,085 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 51,814 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 86,356 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 604,493 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,356 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,356 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 34,542 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 103,627 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,122,629 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,849,751 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 569,950 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,420,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,420,000 Bonds: 5% $ 171,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 513,000 Mobilization 10% $ 342,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 513,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,959,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-T This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: IH 37 to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,308 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,215 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,270 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,993 sy $ 11.70 $ 93,522 B8 JUnderseal 7,993 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 51,637 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,993 sy $ 18.99 $ 151,793 B13 lConcrete Median 5,232 sf $ 53.96 $ 282,319 D4 ISidewalk 4,360 sy $ 50.00 $ 218,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 868,541 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,742 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,742 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,056 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,427 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 303,989 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,427 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,427 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,371 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,112 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 564,552 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,433,093 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 286,619 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,720,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,720,000 Bonds: 5% $ 86,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 258,000 Mobilization 10% $ 172,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 258,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,494,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-U This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Sedwick Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,530 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,152 cy $ 16.91 $ 137,854 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,461 sy $ 11.70 $ 180,895 B8 JUnderseal 15,461 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 99,879 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,461 sy $ 18.99 $ 293,607 B13 lConcrete Median 10,120 sf $ 53.96 $ 546,075 D4 ISidewalk 8,433 sy $ 50.00 $ 421,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,679,976 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 67,199 V Prep ROW 4% $ 67,199 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 50,399 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 83,999 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 587,992 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 83,999 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 83,999 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 33,600 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 100,799 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,091,985 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,771,961 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 554,392 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,327,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,327,000 Bonds: 5% $ 166,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 499,050 Mobilization 10% $ 332,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 499,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,824,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-V This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Lantana St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,302 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,640 cy $ 16.91 $ 179,919 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,179 sy $ 11.70 $ 236,093 B8 JUnderseal 20,179 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 130,356 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,179 sy $ 18.99 $ 383,197 B13 lConcrete Median 13,208 sf $ 53.96 $ 712,704 D4 ISidewalk 11,007 sy $ 50.00 $ 550,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,192,601 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 87,704 V Prep ROW 4% $ 87,704 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 65,778 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 109,630 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 767,410 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 109,630 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 109,630 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 43,852 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 131,556 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,825,191 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,017,792 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 803,558 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,822,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,822,000 Bonds: 5% $ 241,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 723,300 Mobilization 10% $ 482,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 723,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,992,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-W This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lantana St to Hopkins Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,470 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,737 cy $ 16.91 $ 80,097 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,983 sy $ 11.70 $ 105,105 B8 JUnderseal 8,983 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 58,032 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,983 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 170,594 B13 lConcrete Median 5,880 sf $ 53.96 $ 317,285 D4 ISidewalk 4,900 sy $ 50.00 $ 245,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 976,113 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 39,045 V Prep ROW 4% $ 39,045 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,283 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 48,806 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 341,639 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,806 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,806 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,522 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,567 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 634,473 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,610,586 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 322,117 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,933,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,933,000 Bonds: 5% $ 96,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 289,950 Mobilization 10% $ 193,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 289,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,803,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-X This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Hopkins Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 4,879 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 15,721 cy $ 16.91 $ 265,846 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 29,816 sy $ 11.70 $ 348,849 B8 Underseal 29,816 sy $ 6.46 $ 192,612 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 29,816 sy $ 18.99 $ 566,208 B13 lConcrete Median 19,516 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,053,083 D4 ISidewalk 16,263 sy $ 50.00 $ 813,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,239,764 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 129,591 V Prep ROW 4% $ 129,591 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 97,193 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 161,988 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,133,918 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 161,988 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 161,988 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 64,795 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 194,386 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,505,847 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,745,611 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,149,122 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,895,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,895,000 Bonds: 5% $ 344,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,034,250 Mobilization 10% $ 689,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,034,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 9,998,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-Y This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sedwick Rd to Alpine Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,664 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,584 cy $ 16.91 $ 145,155 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,280 sy $ 11.70 $ 190,476 B8 JUnderseal 16,280 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 105,169 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,280 sy $ 18.99 $ 309,157 B13 lConcrete Median 10,656 sf $ 53.96 $ 574,998 D4 ISidewalk 8,880 sy $ 50.00 $ 444,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,768,955 Major Construction Component Allowances: III% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,758 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,758 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,069 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 88,448 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 619,134 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,448 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,448 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,379 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,137 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,549,821 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,318,776 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 663,755 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,983,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,983,000 Bonds: 5% $ 199,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 597,450 Mobilization 10% $ 398,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 597,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,775,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-Z This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Alpine Rd to Railroad roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,922 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,415 cy $ 16.91 $ 159,213 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,857 sy $ 11.70 $ 208,923 B8 JUnderseal 17,857 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 115,354 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,857 sy $ 18.99 $ 339,098 B13 lConcrete Median 11,688 sf $ 53.96 $ 630,684 D4 ISidewalk 9,740 sy $ 50.00 $ 487,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,940,273 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 77,671- V Prep ROW 4% $ 77,611 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 58,208 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 97,014 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 679,096 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 97,014 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 97,014 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 38,805 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 116,416 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,661,177 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,601,450 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 720,290 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,322,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,322,000 Bonds: 5% $ 216,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 648,300 Mobilization 10% $ 432,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 648,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,267,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-AA This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Railroad to TX-44 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 210 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 677 cy $ 16.91 $ 11,442 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,283 sy $ 11.70 $ 15,015 B8 JUnderseal 1,283 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 8,290 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,283 1 sy $ 18.99 $ 24,371 B13 lConcrete Median 840 1 sf $ 53.96 $ 45,326 D4 ISidewalk 700 sy $ 50.00 $ 35,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 139,445 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 5,578 V Prep ROW 4% $ 5,578 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 4,183 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 6,972 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 48,806 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,972 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,972 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,789 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 8,367 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 90,639 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 230,084 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 46,017 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 277,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 277,000 Bonds: 5% $ 13,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 41,550 Mobilization 10% $ 27,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 41,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 402,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- C Project Number: 4-AB This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Sedwick Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 4,657 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,971 cy $ 16.91 $ 236,250 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 26,390 sy $ 11.70 $ 308,759 B8 JUnderseal 26,390 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 170,477 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 26,390 sy $ 18.99 $ 501,140 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 15,523 sy $ 50.00 $ 776,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,992,792 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 79,712 V Prep ROW 4% $ 79,712 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 59,784 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 99,640 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 697,477 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,640 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,640 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 39,856 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 119,568 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,695,315 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,688,107 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 737,621 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,426,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,426,000 Bonds: 5% $ 221,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 663,900 Mobilization 10% $ 442,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 663,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,418,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-AC This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Bronco Rd(End)to Alpine St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,637 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,910 cy $ 16.91 $ 83,035 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,275 sy $ 11.70 $ 108,520 B8 Underseal 9,275 sy $ 6.46 $ 59,918 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,275 sy $ 18.99 $ 176,136 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,456 sy $ 50.00 $ 272,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 700,409 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,016 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,016 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,012 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,020 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 245,143 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,020 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,020 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,008 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,025 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 455,266 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,155,674 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 231,135 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,387,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,387,000 Bonds: 5% $ 69,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 208,050 Mobilization 10% $ 138,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 208,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,011,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 4-AD This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Alpine St to Railroad roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,712 cy $ 16.91 $ 147,320 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,456 sy $ 11.70 $ 192,535 B8 JUnderseal 16,456 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 106,306 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,456 sy $ 18.99 $ 312,499 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,242,660 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 49,706 V Prep ROW 4% $ 49,706 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 37,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 62,133 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 434,931 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 62,133 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 62,133 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,853 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 74,560 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,207,729 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,450,390 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 490,078 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,941,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,941,000 Bonds: 5% $ 147,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 441,150 Mobilization 10% $ 294,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 441,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,264,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 4-AO This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Alpine St to 1,080'South of Alpine St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,581 cy $ 16.91 $ 43,650 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,811 sy $ 13.78 $ 66,291 B8 JUnderseal 4,811 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,077 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 5,045 sy $ 5.65 $ 28,506 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 345,524 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 13,871- V Prep ROW 4% $ 13,821 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,366 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 17,276 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 120,934 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,276 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,276 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,910 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 20,731 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 224,591 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 570,115 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 114,023 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 685,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 685,000 Bonds: 5% $ 34,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 102,750 Mobilization 10% $ 68,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 102,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 993,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project No. 4-AE Project Number: 4-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Agnes St to TS-44 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,373 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,423 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,801 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,389 sy $ 11.70 $ 98,155 B8 IUnderseal I 8,389 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 54,195 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,389 sy $ 18.99 $ 159,313 B13 lConcrete Median 5,491 sf $ 53.96 $ 296,305 D4 ISidewalk I 4,576 sy $ 50.00 $ 228,800 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 911,570 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 36,463 V Prep ROW 4% $ 36,463 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,347 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 45,578 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 319,049 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,578 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,578 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,231 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 54,694 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 592,520 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,504,090 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 300,818 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,805,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,805,000 Bonds: 5% $ 90,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 270,750 Mobilization 10% $ 180,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 270,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,617,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- Description: Project No. 4-AF Project Number: 4-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX-44 to Agnes St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 231 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 744 cy $ 16.91 $ 12,587 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,412 sy $ 11.70 $ 16,517 B8 IUnderseal I 1,412 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 9,119 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,412 sy $ 18.99 $ 26,808 B13 lConcrete Median 924 sf $ 53.96 $ 49,859 D4 ISidewalk I 770 sy $ 50.00 $ 38,500 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 153,389 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 6,136 V Prep ROW 4% $ 6,136 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 4,602 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 7,669 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 53,686 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 7,669 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 7,669 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,068 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 9,203 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 99,703 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 253,092 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 50,618 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 304,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 304,000 Bonds: 5% $ 15,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 45,600 Mobilization 10% $ 30,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 45,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 441,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 4-AG Project Number: 4-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Manning Rd to Bronco Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 2,658 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,645 cy $ 16.91 $ 112,367 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,404 sy $ 11.70 $ 145,127 B8 IUnderseal I 12,404 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 80,130 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,404 sy $ 18.99 $ 235,552 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,860 sy $ 50.00 $ 443,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,016,176 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,647 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,647 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,485 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 50,809 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 355,661 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,809 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,809 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,324 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 60,971 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,060,514 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,076,690 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 415,338 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,493,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,493,000 Bonds: 5% $ 124,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 373,950 Mobilization 10% $ 249,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 373,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,615,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n """__'k�, Description: Project No. 4-AH Project Number: 4-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Bronco Rd to Southern Minerals Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 3,973 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,933 cy $ 16.91 $ 167,959 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,541 sy $ 11.70 $ 216,926 B8 IUnderseal I 18,541 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 119,773 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,541 sy $ 18.99 $ 352,087 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 13,243 sy $ 50.00 $ 662,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,518,911 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 60,756 V Prep ROW 4% $ 60,756 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 45,567 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 75,946 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 531,619 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 75,946 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 75,946 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 30,378 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 91,135 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,387,292 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,906,203 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 581,241 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,488,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,488,000 Bonds: 5% $ 174,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 523,200 Mobilization 10% $ 348,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 523,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,058,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 4-Al Project Number: 4-AI This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sedwick Rd to Alpine St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,666 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,590 cy $ 16.91 $ 145,264 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,292 sy $ 11.70 $ 190,619 B8 IUnderseal I 16,292 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 105,248 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,292 sy $ 18.99 $ 309,389 B13 lConcrete Median 10,664 sf $ 53.96 $ 575,429 D4 ISidewalk I 8,887 sy $ 50.00 $ 444,333 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,770,283 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,811 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,811 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,108 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 88,514 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 619,599 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,514 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,514 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,406 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,217 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,550,684 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,320,967 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 664,193 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,986,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,986,000 Bonds: 5% $ 199,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 597,900 Mobilization 10% $ 398,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 597,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,780,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 4-AJ Project Number: 4-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Alpine St to TX 44 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,877 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,270 cy $ 16.91 $ 156,761 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,582 sy $ 11.70 $ 205,706 B8 IUnderseal I 17,582 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 113,578 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,582 sy $ 18.99 $ 333,876 B13 lConcrete Median 11,508 sf $ 53.96 $ 620,972 D4 ISidewalk I 9,590 sy $ 50.00 $ 479,500 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,910,392 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 76,416 V Prep ROW 4% $ 76,416 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 57,312 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 95,520 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 668,637 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 95,520 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 95,520 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 38,208 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 114,624 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,641,755 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,552,147 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 710,429 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,263,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,263,000 Bonds: 5% $ 213,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 639,450 Mobilization 10% $ 426,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 639,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,181,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Into—rmatfo—n-"k, Description: Project No. 4-AK Project Number: 4-AK This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Leopard St to 2568'S of Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,035 cy $ 16.91 $ 152,776 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 16,837 sy $ 13.78 $ 232,018 B8 IUnderseal I 16,837 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 108,769 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 17,659 sy $ 5.65 $ 99,771 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,209,335 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 48,373 V Prep ROW 4% $ 48,373 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 60,467 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 423,267 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,467 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,467 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,187 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 72,560 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,186,068 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,395,403 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 479,081 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,875,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,875,000 Bonds: 5% $ 143,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 431,250 Mobilization 10% $ 287,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 431,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,169,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- ""—k� Description: Project No. 4-AL Project Number: 4-AL This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 2568'S of Leopard St to Sedwick Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,234 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,905 cy $ 16.91 $ 133,679 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,733 sy $ 13.78 $ 203,016 B8 IUnderseal I 14,733 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 95,173 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 15,451 sy $ 5.65 $ 87,300 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,780 sy $ 50.00 $ 539,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,058,168 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,327 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,327 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,745 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,908 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 370,359 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,908 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,908 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,163 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,490 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,087,809 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,145,978 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 429,196 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,576,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,576,000 Bonds: 5% $ 128,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 386,400 Mobilization 10% $ 257,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 386,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,735,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 4-AN Project Number: 4-AN This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sedwick Rd to Bronco Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,240 Service Area(s): CC Airport 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,720 cy $ 16.91 $ 62,905 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,027 sy $ 11.70 $ 82,212 B8 IUnderseal I 7,027 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 45,392 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,027 sy $ 18.99 $ 133,436 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,133 sy $ 50.00 $ 206,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 530,613 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,225 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,225 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,918 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,531 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 185,714 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,531 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,531 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,612 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,837 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 344,898 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 875,511 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 175,102 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,051,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,051,000 Bonds: 5% $ 52,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 157,650 Mobilization 10% $ 105,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 157,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,524,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Padre Island Dr to Jr Beck Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,135 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,456 cy $ 16.91 $ 244,448 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,867 sy $ 11.70 $ 326,040 B8 Underseal 27,867 sy $ 6.46 $ 180,019 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,867 sy $ 18.99 $ 529,188 B13 lConcrete Median 15,675 sf $ 53.96 $ 845,823 D4 ISidewalk 10,450 sy $ 50.00 $ 522,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,648,018 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 105,971— V Prep ROW 4% $ 105,921 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 79,441 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 132,401 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 926,806 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 132,401 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 132,401 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 52,960 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 158,881 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,121,212 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,769,229 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 953,846 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,7241 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,724,000 Bonds: 5% $ 286,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 858,600 Mobilization 10% $ 572,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 858,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,300,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Jr Beck Dr to Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 660 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,043 cy $ 16.91 $ 51,463 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,867 sy $ 11.70 $ 68,640 B8 Underseal 5,867 sy $ 6.46 $ 37,899 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,867 sy $ 18.99 $ 111,408 B13 lConcrete Median 3,300 sf $ 53.96 $ 178,068 D4 ISidewalk 2,200 sy $ 50.00 $ 110,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 557,477 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,299 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,299 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,724 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 27,874 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 195,117 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,874 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,874 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,150 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,449 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 362,360 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 919,838 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 183,968 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,1041 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,104,000 Bonds: 5% $ 55,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 165,600 Mobilization 10% $ 110,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 165,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,601,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Joe Mireur Rd(New Segment)to Heinsohn Rd(New Segr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,110 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,729 cy $ 16.91 $ 164,525 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,756 sy $ 11.70 $ 219,440 B8 JUnderseal 18,756 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 121,161 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,756 sy $ 18.99 $ 356,168 B13 lConcrete Median 10,550 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,278 D4 ISidewalk 7,033 sy $ 50.00 $ 351,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,782,238 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,290 V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,290 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,467 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 89,112 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 623,783 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,112 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,112 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,645 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,934 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,158,455 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,940,693 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 588,139 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,529,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,529,000 Bonds: 5% $ 176,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 529,350 Mobilization 10% $ 352,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 529,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,117,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • - • • i iii Description: Project Number: 5-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Heinsohn Rd(New Segment)to Westside New Segment roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,845 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,119 cy $ 16.91 $ 221,836 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,289 sy $ 11.70 $ 295,880 B8 Underseal 25,289 sy $ 6.46 $ 163,366 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,289 sy $ 18.99 $ 480,236 B13 lConcrete Median 14,225 sf $ 53.96 $ 767,581 D4 ISidewalk 9,483 sy $ 50.00 $ 474,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,403,066 Major Construction Component Allowances: a Item Description Notes Allowance f Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 96,123 V Prep ROW 4% $ 96,123 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 72,092 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 120,153 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 841,073 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 120,153 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 120,153 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 48,061 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 144,184 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,961,993 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,365,058 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 873,012 Construction Cost TOT $ 5,239,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,239,000 Bonds: 5% $ 261,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 785,850 Mobilization 10% $ 523,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 785,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,597,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Westside New Segment to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,880 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,280 cy $ 16.91 $ 224,565 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,600 sy $ 11.70 $ 299,520 B8 Underseal 25,600 sy $ 6.46 $ 165,376 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,600 sy $ 18.99 $ 486,144 B13 lConcrete Median 14,400 sf $ 53.96 $ 777,024 D4 ISidewalk 9,600 sy $ 50.00 $ 480,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,432,629 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 97,305 V Prep ROW 4% $ 97,305 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 72,979 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 121,631 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 851,420 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 121,631 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 121,631 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 48,653 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 145,958 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,981,209 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,413,838 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 882,768 Construction Cost TOT $ 5,297,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,297,000 Bonds: 5% $ 264,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 794,550 Mobilization 10% $ 529,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 794,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,681,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Joe Mireur Rd to TX-44 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 4,103 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,309 cy $ 16.91 $ 208,145 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,250 sy $ 11.70 $ 272,029 B8 JUnderseal 23,250 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 150,197 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,250 sy $ 18.99 $ 441,524 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,677 sy $ 50.00 $ 683,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,755,728 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,229 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,229 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,672 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,786 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 614,505 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,786 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,786 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,115 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,344 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,541,223 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,296,952 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 659,390 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,957,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,957,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 593,550 Mobilization 10% $ 395,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 593,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,738,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Hensohn Rd to Junior Beck Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,464 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,308 cy $ 16.91 $ 157,406 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,796 sy $ 11.70 $ 208,208 B8 JUnderseal 17,796 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 114,959 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,796 sy $ 18.99 $ 337,938 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,213 sy $ 50.00 $ 410,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,229,177 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 49,167 V Prep ROW 4% $ 49,167 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,875 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 61,459 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 430,212 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,459 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,459 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,584 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 73,751 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,965 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,028,143 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 405,629 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,4341 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,434,000 Bonds: 5% $ 121,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 365,100 Mobilization 10% $ 243,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 365,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,529,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Junior Beck Drto N Padre Island Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 610 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,304 cy $ 16.91 $ 38,968 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,406 sy $ 11.70 $ 51,545 B8 Underseal 4,406 sy $ 6.46 $ 28,460 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,406 sy $ 18.99 $ 83,662 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,033 sy $ 50.00 $ 101,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 304,301 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,172 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,172 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,129 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 15,215 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 106,505 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,215 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,215 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,086 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 18,258 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 197,796 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 502,097 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 100,419 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 603,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 603,000 Bonds: 5% $ 30,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 90,450 Mobilization 10% $ 60,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 90,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 874,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: TX-44 to Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segment roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,275 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,108 cy $ 16.91 $ 69,472 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,792 sy $ 11.70 $ 91,163 B8 JUnderseal 7,792 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 50,334 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,792 sy $ 18.99 $ 147,964 B13 lConcrete Median 5,100 sf $ 53.96 $ 275,196 D4 ISidewalk 4,250 sy $ 50.00 $ 212,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 846,628 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,865 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,865 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,399 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,331 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 296,320 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,331 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,331 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,933 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,798 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 550,308 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,396,937 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 279,387 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,677,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,677,000 Bonds: 5% $ 83,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 251,550 Mobilization 10% $ 167,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 251,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,432,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Talbert Ln(E-W)Proposed Segment to Bates Rd(ProposE roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,580 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,313 cy $ 16.91 $ 140,578 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,767 sy $ 11.70 $ 184,470 B8 JUnderseal 15,767 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 101,853 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,767 sy $ 18.99 $ 299,409 B13 lConcrete Median 10,320 sf $ 53.96 $ 556,867 D4 ISidewalk 8,600 sy $ 50.00 $ 430,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,713,177 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 68,527 V Prep ROW 4% $ 68,527 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 51,395 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 85,659 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 599,612 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,659 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,659 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 34,264 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 102,791 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,113,565 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,826,743 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 565,349 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,393,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,393,000 Bonds: 5% $ 169,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 508,950 Mobilization 10% $ 339,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 508,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,920,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 5-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Bates Rd(Proposed Segment)to Bear Ln roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,605 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,394 cy $ 16.91 $ 141,941 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,919 sy $ 11.70 $ 186,258 B8 JUnderseal 15,919 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 102,840 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,919 sy $ 18.99 $ 302,310 B13 lConcrete Median 10,420 sf $ 53.96 $ 562,263 D4 ISidewalk 8,683 sy $ 50.00 $ 434,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,729,778 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 69,191 V Prep ROW 4% $ 69,191 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 51,893 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 86,489 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 605,422 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,489 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,489 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 34,596 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 103,787 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,124,356 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,854,134 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 570,827 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,425,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,425,000 Bonds: 5% $ 171,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 513,750 Mobilization 10% $ 342,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 513,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,966,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'ki, �fi. Description: Project No. 5-G Project Number: 5-G This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Joe Mireur Rd to Talbert Ln(N-S) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,720 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,160 cy $ 16.91 $ 87,256 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,747 sy $ 11.70 $ 114,036 B8 IUnderseal I 9,747 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 62,963 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,747 sy $ 18.99 $ 185,089 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,733 sy $ 50.00 $ 286,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 736,011 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,440 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,440 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,080 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,801 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 257,604 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,801 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,801 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,720 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,161 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 478,407 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,214,418 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 242,884 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,458,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,458,000 Bonds: 5% $ 72,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 218,700 Mobilization 10% $ 145,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 218,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,114,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 5-H This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Talbert Ln(N-S)to Heinsohn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,110 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,330 cy $ 16.91 $ 157,770 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,623 sy $ 11.70 $ 206,193 B8 IUnderseal I 17,623 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 113,847 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,623 sy $ 18.99 $ 334,667 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,367 sy $ 50.00 $ 518,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,330,810 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 53,232 V Prep ROW 4% $ 53,232 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,924 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 66,541 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 465,784 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,541 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,541 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,616 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,849 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,265,027 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,595,837 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 519,167 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,116,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,116,000 Bonds: 5% $ 155,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 467,400 Mobilization 10% $ 311,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 467,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,518,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 5-13 Project Number: 5-P This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Bear Ln to Proposed roadway segment roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,595 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,803 cy $ 16.91 $ 165,774 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,742 sy $ 11.70 $ 219,278 B8 IUnderseal I 18,742 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 121,071 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,742 sy $ 18.99 $ 355,904 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,650 sy $ 50.00 $ 432,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,294,527 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 51,781 V Prep ROW 4% $ 51,781 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 38,836 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 64,726 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 453,085 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 64,726 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 64,726 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,891 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 77,672 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 841,443 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,135,970 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 427,194 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,564,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,564,000 Bonds: 5% $ 128,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 384,600 Mobilization 10% $ 256,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 384,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,718,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n, ""-�,, Description: Project No. 5-Q Project Number: 5-Q This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Proposed roadway segment to Joe Mireur Rd(New Se€roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,170 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,420 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,742 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,450 sy $ 11.70 $ 98,865 B8 IUnderseal I 8,450 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 54,587 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,450 sy $ 18.99 $ 160,466 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,900 sy $ 50.00 $ 195,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 583,660 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,346 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,346 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,510 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,183 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 204,281 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,183 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,183 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,673 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,020 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 379,379 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 963,039 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 192,608 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,156,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,156,000 Bonds: 5% $ 57,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 173,400 Mobilization 10% $ 115,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 173,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,676,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV Description: Project No. 5-W Project Number: 5-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Heinsohn Rd(Proposed Segment)to FM 665 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,095 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,973 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,640 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,914 sy $ 11.70 $ 221,293 B8 IUnderseal I 18,914 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 122,184 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,914 sy $ 18.99 $ 359,175 B13 lConcrete Median 12,380 sf $ 53.96 $ 668,025 D4 ISidewalk I 10,317 sy $ 50.00 $ 515,833 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,055,149 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 82,206 V Prep ROW 4% $ 82,206 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 61,654 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 102,757 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 719,302 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 102,757 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 102,757 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 41,103 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 123,309 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,847 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,790,995 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 758,199 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,550,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,550,000 Bonds: 5% $ 227,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 682,500 Mobilization 10% $ 455,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 682,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,598,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 5-X Project Number: 5-X This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Padre Island Dr to Heinsohn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,800 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,844 cy $ 16.91 $ 115,740 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,756 sy $ 13.78 $ 175,772 B8 IUnderseal I 12,756 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 82,401 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 13,378 sy $ 5.65 $ 75,584 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,333 sy $ 50.00 $ 466,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 916,163 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 36,647 V Prep ROW 4% $ 36,647 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,485 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 45,808 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 320,657 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,808 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,808 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,323 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 54,970 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 995,506 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,911,669 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 382,334 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,295,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,295,000 Bonds: 5% $ 114,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 344,250 Mobilization 10% $ 229,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 344,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,328,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 5-Y Project Number: 5-Y This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Heinsohn Rd to Joe Mireur Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,840 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 11,831 cy $ 16.91 $ 200,064 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 22,049 sy $ 13.78 $ 303,834 B8 IUnderseal I 22,049 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 142,436 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 23,124 sy $ 5.65 $ 130,653 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 16,133 sy $ 50.00 $ 806,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,583,653 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 63,346 V Prep ROW 4% $ 63,346 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 47,510 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 79,183 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 554,279 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,183 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,183 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,673 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 95,019 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,429,375 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,013,028 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 602,606 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,616,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,616,000 Bonds: 5% $ 180,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 542,400 Mobilization 10% $ 361,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 542,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,243,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 5-Z Project Number: 5-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Heinsohn Rd(Proposed Segment)to Jr Beck Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,680 Service Area(s): CC Airport 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,551 cy $ 16.91 $ 110,779 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,209 sy $ 13.78 $ 168,238 B8 IUnderseal I 12,209 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 78,869 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,804 sy $ 5.65 $ 72,345 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,933 sy $ 50.00 $ 446,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 876,899 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,076 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,076 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,307 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,845 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 306,915 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,845 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,845 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,538 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,614 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 969,984 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,846,883 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 369,377 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,217,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,217,000 Bonds: 5% $ 110,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 332,550 Mobilization 10% $ 221,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 332,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,215,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Benys Rd to Lantana Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,693 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,677 cy $ 16.91 $ 146,725 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,456 sy $ 11.70 $ 192,535 B8 JUnderseal 16,456 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 106,306 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,456 sy $ 18.99 $ 312,499 B13 lConcrete Median 10,771 sf $ 53.96 $ 581,214 D4 ISidewalk 8,976 sy $ 50.00 $ 448,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,788,079 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,523 V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,523 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,642 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 89,404 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 625,828 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,404 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,404 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,762 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 107,285 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,562,251 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,350,330 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 670,066 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,021,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,021,000 Bonds: 5% $ 201,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 603,150 Mobilization 10% $ 402,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 603,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,830,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lantana Rd to SH 358 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 739 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,382 cy $ 16.91 $ 40,277 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,517 sy $ 11.70 $ 52,853 B8 JUnderseal 4,517 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 29,182 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,517 sy $ 18.99 $ 85,784 B13 lConcrete Median 2,957 sf $ 53.96 $ 159,549 D4 ISidewalk 2,464 sy $ 50.00 $ 123,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 490,845 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 19,634 V Prep ROW 4% $ 19,634 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,725 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 24,542 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 171,796 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,542 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,542 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,817 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,451 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 319,049 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 809,895 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 161,979 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 972,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 972,000 Bonds: 5% $ 48,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 145,800 Mobilization 10% $ 97,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 145,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,409,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Dunn Meany rd to Lantana Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,214 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,643 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,607 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,882 sy $ 11.70 $ 80,515 B8 JUnderseal 6,882 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 44,455 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,882 sy $ 18.99 $ 130,682 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,048 sy $ 50.00 $ 202,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 519,658 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,786 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,786 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,590 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,983 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 181,880 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,983 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,983 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,393 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,179 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 337,778 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 857,436 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 171,487 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,029,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,029,000 Bonds: 5% $ 51,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 154,350 Mobilization 10% $ 102,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 154,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,492,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lantana Rd to McBride Ln roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,379 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,138 cy $ 16.91 $ 171,427 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,149 sy $ 11.70 $ 224,041 B8 JUnderseal 19,149 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 123,701 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,149 sy $ 18.99 $ 363,636 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 11,264 sy $ 50.00 $ 563,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,446,005 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 57,840 V Prep ROW 4% $ 57,840 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 43,380 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 72,300 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 506,102 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,300 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,300 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,920 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,760 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,339,903 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,785,908 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 557,182 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,3441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,344,000 Bonds: 5% $ 167,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 501,600 Mobilization 10% $ 334,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 501,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,849,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: McBride Ln to Kansas City Southern Railway Track roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,109 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,326 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,249 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,283 sy $ 11.70 $ 73,513 B8 JUnderseal 6,283 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 40,589 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,283 sy $ 18.99 $ 119,318 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,696 sy $ 50.00 $ 184,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 474,470 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,979 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,979 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,234 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,724 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 166,065 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,724 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,724 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,489 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,468 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 308,406 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 782,876 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 156,575 Construction Cost TOT $ 940,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 940,000 Bonds: 5% $ 47,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 141,000 Mobilization 10% $ 94,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 141,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,363,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Kansas City Southern Railway Track to N Navigation Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,376 cy $ 16.91 $ 40,178 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,488 sy $ 11.70 $ 52,510 B8 JUnderseal 4,488 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 28,992 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,488 sy $ 18.99 $ 85,227 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 338,907 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 13,556 V Prep ROW 4% $ 13,556 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,167 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 16,945 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 118,618 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,945 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,945 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,778 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 20,334 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 220,290 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 559,197 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 111,839 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 672,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 672,000 Bonds: 5% $ 33,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 100,800 Mobilization 10% $ 67,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 100,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 974,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1-37 to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,088 cy $ 16.91 $ 187,498 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,944 sy $ 11.70 $ 245,045 B8 JUnderseal 20,944 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 135,298 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,944 sy $ 18.99 $ 397,727 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,581,568 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 63,263 V Prep ROW 4% $ 63,263 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 47,447 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 79,078 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 553,549 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,078 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,078 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,631 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 94,894 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,428,019 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,009,587 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 601,917 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,612,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,612,000 Bonds: 5% $ 180,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 541,800 Mobilization 10% $ 361,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 541,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,237,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Leopard St to Old Robstown Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,267 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,802 cy $ 16.91 $ 64,285 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,181 sy $ 11.70 $ 84,015 B8 JUnderseal 7,181 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 46,388 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,181 sy $ 18.99 $ 136,363 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,224 sy $ 50.00 $ 211,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 542,252 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,690 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,690 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,268 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 27,113 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 189,788 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,113 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,113 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,845 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 32,535 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 352,464 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 894,715 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 178,943 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,0741 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,074,000 Bonds: 5% $ 53,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 161,100 Mobilization 10% $ 107,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 161,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,557,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Old Robstown Rd to Palm Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,062 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,187 cy $ 16.91 $ 155,356 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,354 sy $ 11.70 $ 203,037 B8 JUnderseal 17,354 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 112,104 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,354 sy $ 18.99 $ 329,545 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 10,208 sy $ 50.00 $ 510,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,310,442 Major Construction Component Allowances: 11116, Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,418 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,418 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,313 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,522 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 458,655 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,522 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,522 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,209 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 78,627 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,251,787 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,562,229 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 512,446 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,075,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,075,000 Bonds: 5% $ 153,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 461,250 Mobilization 10% $ 307,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 461,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,459,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Palm Dr to N Port Ave roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,960 cy $ 16.91 $ 66,964 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,480 sy $ 11.70 $ 87,516 B8 JUnderseal 7,480 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 48,321 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,480 sy $ 18.99 $ 142,045 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 564,846 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,594 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,594 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,945 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,242 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 197,696 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,242 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,242 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,297 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,891 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 367,150 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 931,995 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 186,399 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,119,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,119,000 Bonds: 5% $ 55,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 167,850 Mobilization 10% $ 111,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 167,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,623,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Port Ave to N 19th St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,426 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,277 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,321 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,078 sy $ 11.70 $ 94,517 B8 Underseal 8,078 sy $ 6.46 $ 52,186 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,078 sy $ 18.99 $ 153,409 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,752 sy $ 50.00 $ 237,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 610,033 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,401 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,401 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,301 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 30,502 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 213,512 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,502 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,502 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,201 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 36,602 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 396,522 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,006,555 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 201,311 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,208,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,208,000 Bonds: 5% $ 60,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 181,200 Mobilization 10% $ 120,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 181,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,752,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N 19th St to TX 286 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,109 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,326 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,249 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,283 sy $ 11.70 $ 73,513 B8 JUnderseal 6,283 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 40,589 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,283 sy $ 18.99 $ 119,318 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,696 sy $ 50.00 $ 184,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 474,470 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,979 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,979 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,234 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,724 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 166,065 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,724 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,724 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,489 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,468 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 308,406 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 782,876 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 156,575 Construction Cost TOT $ 940,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 940,000 Bonds: 5% $ 47,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 141,000 Mobilization 10% $ 94,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 141,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,363,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: TX 286 to Greenwood Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 3,749 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,162 cy $ 16.91 $ 239,482 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,075 sy $ 11.70 $ 316,774 B8 JUnderseal 27,075 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 174,902 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,075 sy $ 18.99 $ 514,148 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 12,496 sy $ 50.00 $ 624,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,870,106 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 74,804 V Prep ROW 4% $ 74,804 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 56,103 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 93,505 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 654,537 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,505 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,505 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 37,402 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 112,206 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,615,569 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,485,674 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 697,135 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,183,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,183,000 Bonds: 5% $ 209,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 627,450 Mobilization 10% $ 418,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 627,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,065,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • • • Description: Project Number: 6-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Airport Rd to Angela Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,798 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,572 cy $ 16.91 $ 178,768 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,211 sy $ 11.70 $ 236,465 B8 Underseal 20,211 sy $ 6.46 $ 130,561 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,211 sy $ 18.99 $ 383,801 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 9,328 sy $ 50.00 $ 466,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,395,994 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 55,840 V Prep ROW 4% $ 55,840 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 41,880 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 69,800 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 488,598 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,800 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,800 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,920 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 83,760 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,307,396 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,703,391 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 540,678 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,245,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,245,000 Bonds: 5% $ 162,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 486,750 Mobilization 10% $ 324,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 486,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,705,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 6-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Angela Dr to Old Brownsville Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,984 cy $ 16.91 $ 101,189 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,440 sy $ 11.70 $ 133,848 B8 JUnderseal 11,440 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 73,902 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,440 sy $ 18.99 $ 217,246 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 790,185 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 31,607 V Prep ROW 4% $ 31,607 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 23,706 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 39,509 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 276,565 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,509 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,509 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,804 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 47,411 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 513,621 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,303,806 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 260,761 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,565,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,565,000 Bonds: 5% $ 78,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 234,750 Mobilization 10% $ 156,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 234,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,269,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Old Brownsvillw Rd to Bear Ln roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,989 cy $ 16.91 $ 67,460 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,627 sy $ 11.70 $ 89,232 B8 JUnderseal 7,627 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 49,268 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,627 sy $ 18.99 $ 144,830 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 526,790 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,804 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,340 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 184,377 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,340 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,340 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,536 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,607 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 342,414 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 869,204 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 173,841 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,0441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,044,000 Bonds: 5% $ 52,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 156,600 Mobilization 10% $ 104,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 156,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,514,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 6-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Bear Ln to N Green Tree Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,531 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,785 cy $ 16.91 $ 97,816 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,059 sy $ 11.70 $ 129,386 B8 Underseal 11,059 sy $ 6.46 $ 71,439 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,059 sy $ 18.99 $ 210,004 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,104 sy $ 50.00 $ 255,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 763,846 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 30,554 V Prep ROW 4% $ 30,554 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,915 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 38,192 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 267,346 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,192 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,192 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,277 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 45,831 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 496,500 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,260,346 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 252,069 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,513,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,513,000 Bonds: 5% $ 75,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 226,950 Mobilization 10% $ 151,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 226,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,194,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-11 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Green Tree Dr to 2917'N of Bear Ln roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,989 cy $ 16.91 $ 67,460 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,627 sy $ 11.70 $ 89,232 B8 JUnderseal 7,627 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 49,268 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,627 sy $ 18.99 $ 144,830 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 526,790 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,804 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,340 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 184,377 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,340 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,340 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,536 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,607 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 342,414 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 869,204 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 173,841 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,0441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,044,000 Bonds: 5% $ 52,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 156,600 Mobilization 10% $ 104,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 156,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,514,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-S This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 2917'N of Bear Ln to Santa Elena St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,587 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,774 cy $ 16.91 $ 165,276 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,685 sy $ 11.70 $ 218,618 B8 JUnderseal 18,685 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 120,707 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,685 sy $ 18.99 $ 354,834 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,624 sy $ 50.00 $ 431,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,290,636 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 51,625 V Prep ROW 4% $ 51,625 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 38,719 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 64,532 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 451,723 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 64,532 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 64,532 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,813 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 77,438 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 838,914 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,129,550 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 425,910 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,556,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,556,000 Bonds: 5% $ 127,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 383,400 Mobilization 10% $ 255,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 383,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,706,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-T This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Santa Elena St to Agnes St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,973 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,649 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,067 sy $ 11.70 $ 223,080 B8 Underseal 19,067 sy $ 6.46 $ 123,171 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,067 sy $ 18.99 $ 362,076 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,316,976 Major Construction Component Allowances: W Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,679 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,679 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,509 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,849 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 460,942 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,849 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,849 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,340 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,019 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,256,034 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,573,010 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 514,602 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,088,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,088,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,200 Mobilization 10% $ 308,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,478,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-U This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Agnes St to Leopard St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 4,171 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 15,758 cy $ 16.91 $ 266,466 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 30,125 sy $ 11.70 $ 352,466 B8 JUnderseal 30,125 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 194,610 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 30,125 sy $ 18.99 $ 572,080 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,904 sy $ 50.00 $ 695,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,080,822 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 83,233 V Prep ROW 4% $ 83,233 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 62,425 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 104,041 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 728,288 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 104,041 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 104,041 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 41,616 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 124,849 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,752,534 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,833,356 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 766,671 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,601,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,601,000 Bonds: 5% $ 230,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 690,150 Mobilization 10% $ 460,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 690,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,671,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 • • • Description: Project Number: 6-V This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: TX 358 to Flato Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,323 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,777 cy $ 16.91 $ 148,411 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,779 sy $ 11.70 $ 196,310 B8 Underseal 16,779 sy $ 6.46 $ 108,390 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,779 sy $ 18.99 $ 318,627 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 7,744 sy $ 50.00 $ 387,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,158,939 Major Construction Component Allowances: _..:=111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,358 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,358 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 34,768 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 57,947 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 405,629 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,947 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,947 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,179 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 69,536 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 753,310 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,912,249 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 382,450 Construction Cost TOT $ 2,295,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,295,000 Bonds: 5% $ 114,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 344,250 Mobilization 10% $ 229,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 344,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,328,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-W This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Flato Rd to Cliff Maus Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,059 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,779 cy $ 16.91 $ 131,546 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,872 sy $ 11.70 $ 174,002 B8 Underseal 14,872 sy $ 6.46 $ 96,073 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,872 sy $ 18.99 $ 282,419 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,864 sy $ 50.00 $ 343,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,027,241 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 41,090 V Prep ROW 4% $ 41,090 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,817 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 51,362 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 359,534 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,362 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,362 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,545 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 61,634 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 667,707 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,694,948 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 338,990 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,0341 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,034,000 Bonds: 5% $ 101,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 305,100 Mobilization 10% $ 203,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 305,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,949,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-X This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Cliff Maus Dr to Navigation Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 634 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,394 cy $ 16.91 $ 40,476 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,576 sy $ 11.70 $ 53,539 B8 JUnderseal 4,576 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 29,561 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,576 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 86,898 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,112 sy $ 50.00 $ 105,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 316,074 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,643 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,643 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,482 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 15,804 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 110,626 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,804 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,804 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,321 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 18,964 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 205,448 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 521,522 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 104,304 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 626,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 626,000 Bonds: 5% $ 31,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 93,900 Mobilization 10% $ 62,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 93,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 908,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 6-Y This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Navigation Blvd to Old Brownsville Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,373 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,186 cy $ 16.91 $ 87,698 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,915 sy $ 11.70 $ 116,002 B8 JUnderseal 9,915 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 64,049 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,915 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 188,280 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,576 sy $ 50.00 $ 228,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 684,827 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 27,393 V Prep ROW 4% $ 27,393 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,545 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 34,241 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 239,690 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,241 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,241 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,697 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 41,090 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 445,138 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,129,965 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 225,993 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,356,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,356,000 Bonds: 5% $ 67,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 203,400 Mobilization 10% $ 135,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 203,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,966,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-rV """6 Description: Project No. 6-Z Project Number: 6-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Flato Rd to Navigation Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,746 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,711 cy $ 16.91 $ 113,491 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,508 sy $ 13.78 $ 172,357 B8 IUnderseal I 12,508 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 80,800 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 13,118 sy $ 5.65 $ 74,116 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,152 sy $ 50.00 $ 457,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 898,363 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,935 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,935 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,951 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,918 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 314,427 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,918 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,918 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,967 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,902 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 983,936 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,882,300 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 376,460 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,259,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,259,000 Bonds: 5% $ 112,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 338,850 Mobilization 10% $ 225,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 338,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,276,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 6-AA Project Number: 6-AA This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 345'E of Centaurus St to Omaha Dr Ext roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 317 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 774 cy $ 16.91 $ 13,095 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 1,443 sy $ 13.78 $ 19,887 B8 IUnderseal I 1,443 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 9,323 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,514 sy $ 5.65 $ 8,552 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,056 sy $ 50.00 $ 52,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 103,657 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 4,146 V Prep ROW 4% $ 4,146 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 3,110 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 5,183 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 36,280 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,183 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,183 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,073 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 6,219 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 67,377 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 171,035 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 34,207 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 206,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 206,000 Bonds: 5% $ 10,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 30,900 Mobilization 10% $ 20,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 30,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 299,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informat Description: Project No. 6-AB Project Number: 6-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Omaha Dr Ext to 233'E of 45th St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,162 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,839 cy $ 16.91 $ 48,015 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 5,292 sy $ 13.78 $ 72,920 B8 IUnderseal I 5,292 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 34,185 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 5,550 sy $ 5.65 $ 31,357 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,872 sy $ 50.00 $ 193,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 380,077 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 15,203 V Prep ROW 4% $ 15,203 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 11,402 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 19,004 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 133,027 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,004 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,004 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,602 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 22,805 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 247,050 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 627,127 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 125,425 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 753,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 753,000 Bonds: 5% $ 37,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 112,950 Mobilization 10% $ 75,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 112,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,092,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 6-AC 9„ Project Number: 6-AC This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Agnes St to Santa Elena St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,453 cy $ 16.91 $ 109,126 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,027 sy $ 13.78 $ 165,727 B8 IUnderseal I 12,027 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 77,692 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,613 sy $ 5.65 $ 71,265 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 863,811 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,552 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,552 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,914 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,191 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 302,334 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,191 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,191 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,276 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,829 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 961,477 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,825,288 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 365,058 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,191,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,191,000 Bonds: 5% $ 109,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 328,650 Mobilization 10% $ 219,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 328,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,177,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 6-AD Project Number: 6-AD This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Santa Elena St to Bates Rd Ext roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,587 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,324 cy $ 16.91 $ 106,943 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 11,786 sy $ 13.78 $ 162,413 B8 IUnderseal I 11,786 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 76,138 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,361 sy $ 5.65 $ 69,840 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,624 sy $ 50.00 $ 431,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 846,535 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,861 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,861 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,396 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,327 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 296,287 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,327 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,327 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,931 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,792 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 550,248 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,396,782 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 279,356 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,677,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,677,000 Bonds: 5% $ 83,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 251,550 Mobilization 10% $ 167,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 251,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,432,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV ..... Description: Project No. 6-AE Project Number: 6-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Flato Rd to Navigation Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,693 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,582 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,308 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,267 sy $ 13.78 $ 169,042 B8 IUnderseal I 12,267 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 79,246 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,866 sy $ 5.65 $ 72,691 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,976 sy $ 50.00 $ 448,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 881,087 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,243 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,243 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,433 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,054 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 308,381 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,054 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,054 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,622 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,865 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 972,707 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,853,794 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 370,759 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,225,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,225,000 Bonds: 5% $ 111,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 333,750 Mobilization 10% $ 222,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 333,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,226,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inr0_rm9,tT0_rV ""6 Description: Project No. 6-AF Project Number: 6-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Navigation Blvd to Omaha Dr Ext roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,637 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,001 cy $ 16.91 $ 67,658 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,457 sy $ 13.78 $ 102,751 B8 IUnderseal I 7,457 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 48,169 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,820 sy $ 5.65 $ 44,185 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,456 sy $ 50.00 $ 272,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 535,563 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,423 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,423 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,067 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,778 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 187,447 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,778 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,778 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,711 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 32,134 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 348,116 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 883,679 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 176,736 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,061,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,061,000 Bonds: 5% $ 53,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 159,150 Mobilization 10% $ 106,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 159,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,538,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- '"—k� Description: Project No. 6-AG Project Number: 6-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Omaha Dr Ext to Old Brownsville Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,421 cy $ 16.91 $ 91,666 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,102 sy $ 13.78 $ 139,211 B8 IUnderseal I 10,102 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 65,262 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,595 sy $ 5.65 $ 59,863 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 725,601 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,024 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,024 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,768 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,280 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 253,960 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,280 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,280 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,512 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 43,536 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 471,641 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,197,242 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 239,448 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,437,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,437,000 Bonds: 5% $ 71,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 215,550 Mobilization 10% $ 143,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 215,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,084,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inr0_rm9,tT0_rV ""6 Description: Project No. 6-AH Project Number: 6-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Navigation Blvd to EX Omaha Dr End roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Westside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,388 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,206 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,178 sy $ 13.78 $ 112,695 B8 IUnderseal I 8,178 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 52,831 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,577 sy $ 5.65 $ 48,460 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 587,391 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,496 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,496 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,622 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,370 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 205,587 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,748 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,243 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 381,804 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 969,196 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 193,839 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,164,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,164,000 Bonds: 5% $ 58,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 174,600 Mobilization 10% $ 116,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 174,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,688,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Old Brownsville Rd to CR 37 roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 3,221 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,167 cy $ 16.91 $ 205,752 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,261 sy $ 11.70 $ 272,158 B8 JUnderseal 23,261 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 150,268 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,261 sy $ 18.99 $ 441,733 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 10,736 sy $ 50.00 $ 536,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,606,710 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 64,268 V Prep ROW 4% $ 64,268 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 48,201 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 80,336 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 562,349 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,336 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,336 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 32,134 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,403 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,444,362 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,051,072 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 610,214 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,662,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,662,000 Bonds: 5% $ 183,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 549,300 Mobilization 10% $ 366,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 549,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,310,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: CR 37 to CR 35 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 17,043 cy $ 16.91 $ 288,191 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 32,853 sy $ 11.70 $ 384,384 B8 Underseal 32,853 sy $ 6.46 $ 212,233 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 32,853 sy $ 18.99 $ 623,885 B13 lConcrete Median 18,480 sf $ 53.96 $ 997,181 D4 ISidewalk 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,121,874 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 124,875 V Prep ROW 4% $ 124,875 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 93,656 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 156,094 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,092,656 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,094 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,094 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 62,437 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 187,312 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,429,218 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,551,091 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 1,110,218 Construction Cost TOT $ 6,662,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,662,000 Bonds: 5% $ 333,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 999,300 Mobilization 10% $ 666,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 999,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 9,660,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: CR 35 to Calle Las Colonias roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,376 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,956 cy $ 16.91 $ 185,266 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 21,120 sy $ 11.70 $ 247,104 B8 JUnderseal 21,120 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 136,435 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 21,120 sy $ 18.99 $ 401,069 B13 lConcrete Median 11,880 sf $ 53.96 $ 641,045 D4 ISidewalk 7,920 sy $ 50.00 $ 396,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,006,919 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 80,277 V Prep ROW 4% $ 80,277 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 60,208 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 100,346 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 702,422 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,346 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,346 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,138 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 120,415 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,304,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,311,416 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 662,283 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,974,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,974,000 Bonds: 5% $ 198,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 596,100 Mobilization 10% $ 397,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 596,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,762,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Calle Las Colonias to 275'West of CII Cuernavaca roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,162 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,356 cy $ 16.91 $ 90,574 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,325 sy $ 11.70 $ 120,806 B8 JUnderseal 10,325 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 66,702 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,325 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 196,078 B13 lConcrete Median 5,808 sf $ 53.96 $ 313,400 D4 ISidewalk 3,872 sy $ 50.00 $ 193,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 981,160 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 39,246 V Prep ROW 4% $ 39,246 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,435 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 49,058 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 343,406 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,058 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,058 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,623 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,870 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 637,754 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,618,914 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 323,783 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,943,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,943,000 Bonds: 5% $ 97,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 291,450 Mobilization 10% $ 194,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 291,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,817,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 275'West of CII Cuernavaca to Greenwood Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,742 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,034 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,862 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,488 sy $ 11.70 $ 181,210 B8 JUnderseal 15,488 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 100,052 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,488 sy $ 18.99 $ 294,117 B13 lConcrete Median 8,712 sf $ 53.96 $ 470,100 D4 ISidewalk 5,808 sy $ 50.00 $ 290,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,471,740 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,870 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,870 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,152 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,587 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 515,109 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,435 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,304 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 956,631 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,428,372 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 485,674 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,915,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,915,000 Bonds: 5% $ 145,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 437,250 Mobilization 10% $ 291,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 437,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,227,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Greenwood Drto New Road(North of Saratoga) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,848 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,521 cy $ 16.91 $ 144,096 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,427 sy $ 11.70 $ 192,192 B8 JUnderseal 16,427 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 106,116 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,427 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 311,942 B13 lConcrete Median 9,240 sf $ 53.96 $ 498,590 D4 ISidewalk 6,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 308,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,560,937 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 62,437 V Prep ROW 4% $ 62,437 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,828 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 78,047 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 546,328 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 78,047 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 78,047 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,219 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 93,656 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,014,609 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,575,546 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 515,109 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,091,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,091,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,650 Mobilization 10% $ 309,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,482,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: New Road(North of Saratoga)to TX 286 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,226 cy $ 16.91 $ 172,915 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,712 sy $ 11.70 $ 230,630 B8 JUnderseal 19,712 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 127,340 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,712 sy $ 18.99 $ 374,331 B13 lConcrete Median 11,088 sf $ 53.96 $ 598,308 D4 ISidewalk 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,873,124 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 74,925 V Prep ROW 4% $ 74,925 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 56,194 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 93,656 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 655,593 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,656 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,656 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 37,462 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 112,387 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,217,531 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,090,655 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 618,131 Construction Cost TOT $ 3,709,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,709,000 Bonds: 5% $ 185,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 556,350 Mobilization 10% $ 370,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 556,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,378,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Los Robles St to Greenwood Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,109 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,573 cy $ 16.91 $ 60,416 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,776 sy $ 11.70 $ 79,279 B8 JUnderseal 6,776 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 43,773 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,776 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 128,676 B13 lConcrete Median 4,435 sf $ 53.96 $ 239,323 D4 ISidewalk 3,696 sy $ 50.00 $ 184,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 736,268 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,451 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,451 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,088 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,813 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 257,694 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,813 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,813 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,725 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,176 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 478,574 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,214,842 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 242,968 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,458,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,458,000 Bonds: 5% $ 72,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 218,700 Mobilization 10% $ 145,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 218,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,114,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Greenwood Drto Martin St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy 1 $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy 1 $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Martin St to TX 286 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,478 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,764 cy $ 16.91 $ 80,555 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,035 sy $ 11.70 $ 105,706 B8 JUnderseal 9,035 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 58,364 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,035 sy $ 18.99 $ 171,568 B13 lConcrete Median 5,914 sf $ 53.96 $ 319,098 D4 ISidewalk 4,928 sy $ 50.00 $ 246,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 981,690 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 39,268 V Prep ROW 4% $ 39,268 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,451 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 49,085 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 343,592 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,085 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,085 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,634 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,901 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 638,099 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,619,789 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 323,958 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,944,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,944,000 Bonds: 5% $ 97,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 291,600 Mobilization 10% $ 194,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 291,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,819,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: SH 358 to 158'N of Jr Beck Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,608 cy $ 16.91 $ 247,021 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 28,160 sy $ 11.70 $ 329,472 B8 Underseal 28,160 sy $ 6.46 $ 181,914 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 28,160 sy $ 18.99 $ 534,758 B13 lConcrete Median 15,840 sf $ 53.96 $ 854,726 D4 ISidewalk 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,675,892 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 107,036 V Prep ROW 4% $ 107,036 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 80,277 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 133,795 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 936,562 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,795 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,795 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 53,518 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 160,554 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,139,330 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,815,221 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 963,044 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,779,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,779,000 Bonds: 5% $ 288,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 866,850 Mobilization 10% $ 577,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 866,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,380,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 158'N of Jr Beck Drto Holly Rd Extension roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 634 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,922 cy $ 16.91 $ 49,404 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,632 sy $ 11.70 $ 65,894 B8 JUnderseal 5,632 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 36,383 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,632 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 106,952 B13 lConcrete Median 3,168 sf $ 53.96 $ 170,945 D4 ISidewalk 2,112 sy $ 50.00 $ 105,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 535,178 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,407 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,407 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,055 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,759 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 187,312 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,759 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,759 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,704 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 32,111 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 347,866 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 883,044 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 176,609 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,060,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,060,000 Bonds: 5% $ 53,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 159,000 Mobilization 10% $ 106,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 159,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,537,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Holly Rd Extension to New Road EW 2 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,112 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,739 cy $ 16.91 $ 164,681 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,773 sy $ 11.70 $ 219,648 B8 Underseal 18,773 sy $ 6.46 $ 121,276 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,773 sy $ 18.99 $ 356,506 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 7,040 sy $ 50.00 $ 352,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,783,928 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,357 V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,357 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,518 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 89,196 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 624,375 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,196 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,196 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,679 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 107,036 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,159,553 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,943,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 588,696 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,533,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,533,000 Bonds: 5% $ 176,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 529,950 Mobilization 10% $ 353,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 529,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,123,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: New Road EW 2 to New Road EW1 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,851 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,147 cy $ 16.91 $ 222,319 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,344 sy $ 11.70 $ 296,525 B8 JUnderseal 25,344 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 163,722 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,344 sy $ 18.99 $ 481,283 B13 lConcrete Median 14,256 sf $ 53.96 $ 769,254 D4 ISidewalk 9,504 sy $ 50.00 $ 475,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,408,303 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 96,332 V Prep ROW 4% $ 96,332 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 72,249 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 120,415 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 842,906 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 120,415 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 120,415 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 48,166 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 144,498 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,965,397 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,373,699 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 874,740 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,249,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,249,000 Bonds: 5% $ 262,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 787,350 Mobilization 10% $ 524,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 787,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,611,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 7-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: New Road EW 1 to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,391 cy $ 16.91 $ 226,436 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 302,016 B8 JUnderseal 25,813 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 166,754 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 490,195 B13 lConcrete Median 14,520 sf $ 53.96 $ 783,499 D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,452,901 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,116 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,116 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 73,587 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 122,645 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 858,515 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,058 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 147,174 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,994,385 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,447,286 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 889,457 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,337,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,337,000 Bonds: 5% $ 266,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 800,550 Mobilization 10% $ 533,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 800,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,739,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 7-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Saratoga Blvd to New Road(S of Saratoga) roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 7-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: New Road(S of Saratoga)to 2250'S of New Road(S of&roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,270 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,811 cy $ 16.91 $ 115,177 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,866 sy $ 11.70 $ 150,528 B8 JUnderseal 12,866 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 83,112 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,866 sy $ 18.99 $ 244,318 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 7,568 sy $ 50.00 $ 378,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 971,534 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 38,861 V Prep ROW 4% $ 38,861 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,146 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 48,577 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 340,037 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,577 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,577 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,431 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,292 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 631,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,603,032 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 320,606 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,924,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,924,000 Bonds: 5% $ 96,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 288,600 Mobilization 10% $ 192,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 288,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,790,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV ..... Description: Project No. 7-R Project Number: 7-11 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sliverberry Dr to Greenwood Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,851 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,970 cy $ 16.91 $ 117,856 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,989 sy $ 13.78 $ 178,986 B8 IUnderseal I 12,989 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 83,908 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 13,622 sy $ 5.65 $ 76,967 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,504 sy $ 50.00 $ 475,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 932,916 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 37,317 V Prep ROW 4% $ 37,317 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,987 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 46,646 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 326,521 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,646 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,646 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,658 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 55,975 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,006,395 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,939,311 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 387,862 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,328,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,328,000 Bonds: 5% $ 116,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 349,200 Mobilization 10% $ 232,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 349,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,376,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-S Project Number: 7-S This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Holly Rd to Crosstown Expy roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,010 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,357 cy $ 16.91 $ 124,403 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 13,710 sy $ 13.78 $ 188,929 B8 IUnderseal I 13,710 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 88,569 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 14,379 sy $ 5.65 $ 81,242 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,032 sy $ 50.00 $ 501,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 984,744 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 39,390 V Prep ROW 4% $ 39,390 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,542 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 49,237 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 344,661 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,237 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,237 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,695 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 59,085 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,040,084 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,024,828 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 404,966 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,430,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,430,000 Bonds: 5% $ 121,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 364,500 Mobilization 10% $ 243,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 364,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,524,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-T Project Number: 7-T This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 136'S of Secretariat St to New Road EW 3 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 158 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 387 cy $ 16.91 $ 6,548 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 722 sy $ 13.78 $ 9,944 B8 IUnderseal I 722 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 4,662 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 757 sy $ 5.65 $ 4,276 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 528 sy $ 50.00 $ 26,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 51,829 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 2,073 V Prep ROW 4% $ 2,073 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 1,555 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 2,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 18,140 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 2,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 2,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,037 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 3,110 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 33,689 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 85,517 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 17,103 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 103,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 103,000 Bonds: 5% $ 5,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 15,450 Mobilization 10% $ 10,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 15,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 149,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info_rmatfo_n ""'O� W Description: Project No. 7-U Project Number: 7-U This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 600'East of Harwick Dr to New Road(North of Saratog roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,936 cy $ 16.91 $ 32,738 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,608 sy $ 13.78 $ 49,718 B8 IUnderseal I 3,608 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 23,308 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,784 sy $ 5.65 $ 21,380 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 259,143 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,366 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,366 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,774 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 12,957 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 90,700 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,957 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,957 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,183 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,549 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 168,443 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 427,586 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 85,517 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 514,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 514,000 Bonds: 5% $ 25,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 77,100 Mobilization 10% $ 51,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 77,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 745,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 7-V Project Number: 7-V This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: New Road(North of Saratoga)to Martin St Extension roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,936 cy $ 16.91 $ 32,738 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,608 sy $ 13.78 $ 49,718 B8 IUnderseal I 3,608 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 23,308 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,784 sy $ 5.65 $ 21,380 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 259,143 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,366 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,366 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,774 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 12,957 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 90,700 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,957 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,957 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,183 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,549 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 168,443 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 427,586 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 85,517 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 514,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 514,000 Bonds: 5% $ 25,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 77,100 Mobilization 10% $ 51,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 77,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 745,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-W Project Number: 7-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Martin Rd Extension to Crosstown Expy roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,478 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,614 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,110 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,735 sy $ 13.78 $ 92,807 B8 IUnderseal I 6,735 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 43,508 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,063 sy $ 5.65 $ 39,909 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,928 sy $ 50.00 $ 246,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 483,734 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 19,349 V Prep ROW 4% $ 19,349 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,512 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 24,187 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 169,307 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,187 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,187 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,675 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,024 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 314,427 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,161 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 159,632 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 958,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 958,000 Bonds: 5% $ 47,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 143,700 Mobilization 10% $ 95,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 143,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,389,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-X Project Number: 7-X This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Martin Rd Extension to Crosstown Expy roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,478 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,614 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,110 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,735 sy $ 13.78 $ 92,807 B8 IUnderseal I 6,735 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 43,508 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,063 sy $ 5.65 $ 39,909 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,928 sy $ 50.00 $ 246,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 483,734 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 19,349 V Prep ROW 4% $ 19,349 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,512 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 24,187 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 169,307 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,187 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,187 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,675 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,024 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 314,427 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,161 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 159,632 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 958,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 958,000 Bonds: 5% $ 47,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 143,700 Mobilization 10% $ 95,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 143,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,389,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-Y Project Number: 7-Y This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Lands Rd Extension to New Road EW 3 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,587 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,324 cy $ 16.91 $ 106,943 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 11,786 sy $ 13.78 $ 162,413 B8 IUnderseal I 11,786 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 76,138 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,361 sy $ 5.65 $ 69,840 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,624 sy $ 50.00 $ 431,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 846,535 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,861 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,861 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,396 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,327 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 296,287 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,327 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,327 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,931 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,792 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 550,248 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,396,782 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 279,356 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,677,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,677,000 Bonds: 5% $ 83,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 251,550 Mobilization 10% $ 167,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 251,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,432,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-Z Project Number: 7-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Lands Rd Extension to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,227 cy $ 16.91 $ 54,563 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,013 sy $ 13.78 $ 82,864 B8 IUnderseal I 6,013 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 38,846 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,307 sy $ 5.65 $ 35,633 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 431,905 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,276 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,276 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,957 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 21,595 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 151,167 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,638 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,914 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 712,644 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 142,529 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 856,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 856,000 Bonds: 5% $ 42,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 128,400 Mobilization 10% $ 85,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 128,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,241,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AA Project Number: 7-AA This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Saratoga Blvd to Greenwood Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,382 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,713 cy $ 16.91 $ 181,149 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 19,964 sy $ 13.78 $ 275,108 B8 IUnderseal I 19,964 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 128,969 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 20,938 sy $ 5.65 $ 118,300 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 14,608 sy $ 50.00 $ 730,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,433,926 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 57,357 V Prep ROW 4% $ 57,357 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 43,018 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 71,696 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 501,874 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,696 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,696 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,679 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,036 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,332,052 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,765,978 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 553,196 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,320,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,320,000 Bonds: 5% $ 166,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 498,000 Mobilization 10% $ 332,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 498,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,814,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- C Project Number: 7-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Greenw000d Dr to TX 286 roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(P1) Length(If): 2,587 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,324 cy $ 16.91 $ 106,943 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,786 sy $ 11.70 $ 137,898 B8 IUnderseal I 11,786 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 76,138 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,786 sy $ 18.99 $ 223,819 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,624 sy $ 50.00 $ 431,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 975,998 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 39,040 V Prep ROW 4% $ 39,040 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 48,800 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 341,599 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,800 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,800 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,520 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,560 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 634,399 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,610,397 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 322,079 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,933,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,933,000 Bonds: 5% $ 96,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 289,950 Mobilization 10% $ 193,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 289,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,803,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 i11 Description: Project Number: 7-AC This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Old Brownsville Rd to W Point NS 1 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 422 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,361 cy $ 16.91 $ 23,016 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 2,581 sy $ 11.70 $ 30,202 B8 IUnderseal I 2,581 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 16,675 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 2,581 sy $ 18.99 $ 49,020 B13 lConcrete Median 1,690 sf $ 53.96 $ 91,171 D4 ISidewalk I 1,408 sy $ 50.00 $ 70,400 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 280,483 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 11,219 V Prep ROW 4% $ 11,219 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 8,414 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 14,024 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 98,169 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 14,024 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 14,024 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,610 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 16,829 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 182,314 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 462,797 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 92,559 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 556,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 556,000 Bonds: 5% $ 27,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 83,400 Mobilization 10% $ 55,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 83,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 806,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project Number: 7-AD This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: W Point Rd NS 1 to Extension CR 37 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,637 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,274 cy $ 16.91 $ 89,186 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,003 sy $ 11.70 $ 117,031 B8 IUnderseal I 10,003 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 64,617 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,003 sy $ 18.99 $ 189,951 B13 lConcrete Median 6,547 sf $ 53.96 $ 353,287 D4 ISidewalk I 5,456 sy $ 50.00 $ 272,800 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,086,872 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 43,475 V Prep ROW 4% $ 43,475 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 32,606 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 54,344 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 380,405 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 54,344 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 54,344 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,737 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 65,212 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 706,467 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,793,338 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 358,668 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,153,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,153,000 Bonds: 5% $ 107,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 322,950 Mobilization 10% $ 215,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 322,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,122,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project Number: 7-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Extension CR 37 to Extension CR 35 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,357 cy $ 16.91 $ 158,233 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,747 sy $ 11.70 $ 207,636 B8 IUnderseal I 17,747 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 114,643 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,747 sy $ 18.99 $ 337,009 B13 lConcrete Median 11,616 sf $ 53.96 $ 626,799 D4 ISidewalk I 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,928,321 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 77,133 V Prep ROW 4% $ 77,133 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 57,850 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 96,416 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 674,912 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 96,416 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 96,416 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 38,566 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 115,699 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,653,408 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,581,729 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 716,346 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,299,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,299,000 Bonds: 5% $ 214,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 644,850 Mobilization 10% $ 429,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 644,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,234,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project No. 7-AF Project Number: 7-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Extension CR 35 to Bush St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,208 cy $ 16.91 $ 172,617 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,360 sy $ 11.70 $ 226,512 B8 IUnderseal I 19,360 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 125,066 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,360 sy $ 18.99 $ 367,646 B13 lConcrete Median 12,672 sf $ 53.96 $ 683,781 D4 ISidewalk I 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,103,622 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 84,145 V Prep ROW 4% $ 84,145 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 63,109 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 105,181 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 736,268 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,181 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,181 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,072 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 126,217 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,767,355 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,870,977 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 774,195 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,646,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,646,000 Bonds: 5% $ 232,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 696,900 Mobilization 10% $ 464,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 696,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,737,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AG Project Number: 7-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: W Point Rd to Holly Rd Extension roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 528 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,291 cy $ 16.91 $ 21,825 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,405 sy $ 13.78 $ 33,145 B8 IUnderseal I 2,405 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 15,538 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 2,523 sy $ 5.65 $ 14,253 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 88,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 172,762 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 6,910 V Prep ROW 4% $ 6,910 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 5,183 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 8,638 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 60,467 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,638 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,638 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,455 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 10,366 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 112,295 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 285,058 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 57,012 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 343,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 343,000 Bonds: 5% $ 17,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 51,450 Mobilization 10% $ 34,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 51,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 497,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AH Project Number: 7-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Saratoga Blvd to New Road EW 1 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,270 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,550 cy $ 16.91 $ 93,848 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,343 sy $ 13.78 $ 142,526 B8 IUnderseal I 10,343 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 66,815 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,847 sy $ 5.65 $ 61,288 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,568 sy $ 50.00 $ 378,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 742,877 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,715 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,715 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,286 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 37,144 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 260,007 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,144 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,144 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,858 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,573 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 482,870 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,225,748 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 245,150 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,471,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,471,000 Bonds: 5% $ 73,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 220,650 Mobilization 10% $ 147,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 220,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,133,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-Al Project Number: 7-AI This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: New Road EW 1 to New Road EW 2 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,851 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,970 cy $ 16.91 $ 117,856 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,989 sy $ 13.78 $ 178,986 B8 IUnderseal I 12,989 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 83,908 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 13,622 sy $ 5.65 $ 76,967 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,504 sy $ 50.00 $ 475,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 932,916 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 37,317 V Prep ROW 4% $ 37,317 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,987 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 46,646 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 326,521 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,646 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,646 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,658 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 55,975 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,006,395 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,939,311 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 387,862 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,328,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,328,000 Bonds: 5% $ 116,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 349,200 Mobilization 10% $ 232,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 349,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,376,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AJ Project Number: 7-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: New Road EW 2 to Holly Rd Extension roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,905 cy $ 16.91 $ 82,936 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,140 sy $ 13.78 $ 125,953 B8 IUnderseal I 9,140 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 59,046 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,586 sy $ 5.65 $ 54,162 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 656,496 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,260 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,260 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,695 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 32,825 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 229,774 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,825 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,825 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,130 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,390 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 426,723 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,083,219 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 216,644 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,300,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,300,000 Bonds: 5% $ 65,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 195,000 Mobilization 10% $ 130,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 195,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,885,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AK Project Number: 7-AK This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Holly Rd Extension to W Point Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,426 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,485 cy $ 16.91 $ 58,928 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,494 sy $ 13.78 $ 89,493 B8 IUnderseal I 6,494 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 41,954 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,811 sy $ 5.65 $ 38,483 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,752 sy $ 50.00 $ 237,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 466,458 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,658 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,658 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,994 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,323 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 163,260 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,323 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,323 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,329 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 27,987 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 303,198 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 769,656 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 153,931 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 924,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 924,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 138,600 Mobilization 10% $ 92,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 138,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,340,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 7-AL Project Number: 7-AL This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Old Brownsville Rd to Extension CR 37 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,905 cy $ 16.91 $ 82,936 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,140 sy $ 13.78 $ 125,953 B8 IUnderseal I 9,140 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 59,046 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,586 sy $ 5.65 $ 54,162 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 656,496 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,260 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,260 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,695 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 32,825 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 229,774 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,825 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,825 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,130 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,390 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 426,723 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,083,219 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 216,644 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,300,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,300,000 Bonds: 5% $ 65,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 195,000 Mobilization 10% $ 130,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 195,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,885,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 7-AM Project Number: 7-AM This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Old Brownsville Rd to Extension CR 37 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,388 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,206 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,178 sy $ 13.78 $ 112,695 B8 IUnderseal I 8,178 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 52,831 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,577 sy $ 5.65 $ 48,460 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 587,391 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,496 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,496 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,622 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,370 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 205,587 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,748 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,243 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 381,804 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 969,196 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 193,839 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,164,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,164,000 Bonds: 5% $ 58,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 174,600 Mobilization 10% $ 116,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 174,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,688,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AN Project Number: 7-AN This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Extension CR 37 to Extension CR 35 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,590 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,777 cy $ 16.91 $ 148,411 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 16,356 sy $ 13.78 $ 225,389 B8 IUnderseal I 16,356 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 105,661 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 17,154 sy $ 5.65 $ 96,921 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 11,968 sy $ 50.00 $ 598,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,174,783 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,991 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,991 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,243 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 58,739 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 411,174 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,739 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,739 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,496 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 70,487 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,163,609 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,338,392 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 467,678 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,807,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,807,000 Bonds: 5% $ 140,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 421,050 Mobilization 10% $ 280,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 421,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,070,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project No. 7-AO Project Number: 7-AO This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Saratoga Blvd to New Road EW 1 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,323 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,486 cy $ 16.91 $ 126,586 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,197 sy $ 11.70 $ 166,109 B8 IUnderseal I 14,197 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 91,715 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,197 sy $ 18.99 $ 269,607 B13 lConcrete Median 9,293 sf $ 53.96 $ 501,439 D4 ISidewalk I 7,744 sy $ 50.00 $ 387,200 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,542,656 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 61,706 V Prep ROW 4% $ 61,706 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 77,133 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 539,930 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,133 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,133 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 30,853 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 92,559 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,002,727 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,545,383 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 509,077 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,055,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,055,000 Bonds: 5% $ 152,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 458,250 Mobilization 10% $ 305,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 458,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,430,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information. Description: Project No. 7-AP Project Number: 7-AP This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: New Road EW 1 to Holly Rd Extension roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,749 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 12,079 cy $ 16.91 $ 204,264 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,909 sy $ 11.70 $ 268,039 B8 IUnderseal I 22,909 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 147,994 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,909 sy $ 18.99 $ 435,048 B13 lConcrete Median 14,995 sf $ 53.96 $ 809,141 D4 ISidewalk I 12,496 sy $ 50.00 $ 624,800 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,489,287 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 99,571 V Prep ROW 4% $ 99,571 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 74,679 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 124,464 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 871,250 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 124,464 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 124,464 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,786 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 149,357 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,018,036 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,507,323 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 901,465 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,409,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,409,000 Bonds: 5% $ 270,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 811,350 Mobilization 10% $ 540,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 811,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,843,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- Description: Project No. 7-AQ Project Number: 7-AQ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Holly Rd Extension to W Point Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,379 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,889 cy $ 16.91 $ 184,125 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,651 sy $ 11.70 $ 241,613 B8 IUnderseal I 20,651 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 133,403 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,651 sy $ 18.99 $ 392,156 B13 lConcrete Median 13,517 sf $ 53.96 $ 729,367 D4 ISidewalk I 11,264 sy $ 50.00 $ 563,200 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,243,864 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,755 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,755 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 67,316 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 112,193 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 785,352 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 112,193 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 112,193 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,877 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 134,632 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,858,512 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,102,375 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 820,475 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,923,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,923,000 Bonds: 5% $ 246,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 738,450 Mobilization 10% $ 492,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 738,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,138,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 7-AR Project Number: 7-AR This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Calle las Colonias to Extension CR 37 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Westside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,744 cy $ 16.91 $ 130,951 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,432 sy $ 13.78 $ 198,873 B8 IUnderseal I 14,432 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 93,231 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 15,136 sy $ 5.65 $ 85,518 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,036,573 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 41,463 V Prep ROW 4% $ 41,463 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,097 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 51,829 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 362,801 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,829 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,829 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,731 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 62,194 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,073,773 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,110,346 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 422,069 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,533,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,533,000 Bonds: 5% $ 126,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 379,950 Mobilization 10% $ 253,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 379,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,673,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Antelope St to IH 37 roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 211 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 798 cy $ 16.91 $ 13,492 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,525 sy $ 11.70 $ 17,846 B8 Underseal 1,525 sy $ 6.46 $ 9,854 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,525 sy $ 18.99 $ 28,966 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 704 sy $ 50.00 $ 35,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 105,358 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 4,214 V Prep ROW 4% $ 4,214 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 3,161 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 5,268 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 36,875 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,268 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,268 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,107 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 6,321 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 68,483 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 173,841 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 34,768 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 209,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 209,000 Bonds: 5% $ 10,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 31,350 Mobilization 10% $ 20,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 31,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 303,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: I H 37 to W Broadway St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,208 cy $ 16.91 $ 172,617 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,360 sy $ 11.70 $ 226,512 B8 JUnderseal 19,360 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 125,066 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,360 sy $ 18.99 $ 367,646 B13 lConcrete Median 12,672 sf $ 53.96 $ 683,781 D4 ISidewalk 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,103,622 Major Construction Component Allowances: III% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 84,145 V Prep ROW 4% $ 84,145 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 63,109 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 105,181 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 736,268 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,181 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,181 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,072 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 126,217 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,767,355 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,870,977 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 774,195 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,646,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,646,000 Bonds: 5% $ 232,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 696,900 Mobilization 10% $ 464,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 696,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,737,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: W Broadway St to Union Pacific/W Broadway St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 710 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,288 cy $ 16.91 $ 38,686 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,339 sy $ 11.70 $ 50,765 B8 Underseal 4,339 sy $ 6.46 $ 28,029 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,339 sy $ 18.99 $ 82,396 B13 lConcrete Median 2,840 sf $ 53.96 $ 153,246 D4 ISidewalk 2,367 sy $ 50.00 $ 118,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 471,456 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,858 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,858 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,144 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 23,573 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 165,010 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,573 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,573 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,429 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,287 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 306,446 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 777,902 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 155,580 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 934,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 934,000 Bonds: 5% $ 46,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 140,100 Mobilization 10% $ 93,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 140,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,354,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Union Pacific/W Broadway St to N Tancahua St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,069 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,889 cy $ 16.91 $ 167,223 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,755 sy $ 11.70 $ 219,434 B8 JUnderseal 18,755 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 121,157 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,755 sy $ 18.99 $ 356,157 B13 lConcrete Median 12,276 sf $ 53.96 $ 662,413 D4 ISidewalk 10,230 sy $ 50.00 $ 511,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,037,884 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 81,515 V Prep ROW 4% $ 81,515 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 61,137 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 101,894 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 713,259 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 101,894 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 101,894 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,758 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 122,273 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,724,625 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,762,509 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 752,502 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,516,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,516,000 Bonds: 5% $ 225,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 677,400 Mobilization 10% $ 451,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 677,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,548,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Tancahua St to US 181 roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 615 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,982 cy $ 16.91 $ 33,510 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,758 sy $ 11.70 $ 43,973 B8 JUnderseal 3,758 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 24,279 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,758 sy $ 18.99 $ 71,371 B13 lConcrete Median 2,460 sf $ 53.96 $ 132,742 D4 ISidewalk 2,050 sy $ 50.00 $ 102,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 408,374 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 16,335 V Prep ROW 4% $ 16,335 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,251 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 20,419 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 142,931 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,419 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,419 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,167 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,502 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 265,443 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 673,817 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 134,763 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 809,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 809,000 Bonds: 5% $ 40,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 121,350 Mobilization 10% $ 80,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 121,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,173,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: US 181 to N Mesquite St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 182 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 586 cy $ 16.91 $ 9,917 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,112 sy $ 11.70 $ 13,013 B8 JUnderseal 1,112 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 7,185 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,112 1 sy $ 18.99 $ 21,121 B13 lConcrete Median 728 1 sf $ 53.96 $ 39,283 D4 ISidewalk 607 sy $ 50.00 $ 30,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 120,852 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 4,834 V Prep ROW 4% $ 4,834 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 3,626 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 6,043 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 42,298 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,043 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,043 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,417 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 7,251 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 78,554 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 199,406 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 39,881 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 240,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 240,000 Bonds: 5% $ 12,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 36,000 Mobilization 10% $ 24,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 36,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 348,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N Mesquite St to N Chaparral St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 263 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 847 cy $ 16.91 $ 14,330 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,607 sy $ 11.70 $ 18,805 B8 Underseal 1,607 sy $ 6.46 $ 10,383 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,607 sy $ 18.99 $ 30,521 B13 lConcrete Median 1,052 sf $ 53.96 $ 56,766 D4 ISidewalk 877 sy $ 50.00 $ 43,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 174,638 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 6,986 V Prep ROW 4% $ 6,986 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 5,239 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 8,732 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 61,123 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,732 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,732 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,493 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 10,478 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 113,515 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 288,152 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 57,630 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 346,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 346,000 Bonds: 5% $ 17,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 51,900 Mobilization 10% $ 34,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 51,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 502,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Burleson St to E Walnut St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,152 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,260 cy $ 16.91 $ 88,954 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 9,804 sy $ 13.78 $ 135,093 B8 JUnderseal 9,804 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 63,331 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 10,282 sy $ 5.65 $ 58,092 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 7,173 sy $ 50.00 $ 358,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 704,137 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,165 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,165 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,124 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,207 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 246,448 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,207 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,207 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,083 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,248 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 457,689 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,161,826 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 232,365 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,395,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,395,000 Bonds: 5% $ 69,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 209,250 Mobilization 10% $ 139,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 209,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,023,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 8-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: E Walnut St to Elm St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 363 Service Area(s): Downtown Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 887 cy $ 16.91 $ 15,005 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 1,654 sy $ 13.78 $ 22,788 B8 JUnderseal 1,654 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 10,683 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 1,734 sy $ 5.65 $ 9,799 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 1,210 sy $ 50.00 $ 60,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 118,774 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 4,751 V Prep ROW 4% $ 4,751 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 3,563 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 5,939 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 41,571 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,939 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,939 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,375 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 7,126 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 77,203 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 195,977 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 39,195 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 236,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 236,000 Bonds: 5% $ 11,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 35,400 Mobilization 10% $ 23,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 35,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 342,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info_rmatfo_n 'k� Description: Project No. 8-J Project Number: 8-J This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: W Broadway St to N Tancahua St roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Downtown Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,227 cy $ 16.91 $ 54,563 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,013 sy $ 13.78 $ 82,864 B8 IUnderseal I 6,013 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 38,846 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,307 sy $ 5.65 $ 35,633 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 431,905 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,276 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,276 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,957 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 21,595 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 151,167 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,638 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,914 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 712,644 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 142,529 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 856,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 856,000 Bonds: 5% $ 42,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 128,400 Mobilization 10% $ 85,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 128,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,241,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- ""—k� Description: Project No. 8-K Project Number: 8-K This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N Tancahua St to US 181 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 317 Service Area(s): Downtown Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 774 cy $ 16.91 $ 13,095 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 1,443 sy $ 13.78 $ 19,887 B8 IUnderseal I 1,443 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 9,323 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,514 sy $ 5.65 $ 8,552 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,056 sy $ 50.00 $ 52,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 103,657 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 4,146 V Prep ROW 4% $ 4,146 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 3,110 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 5,183 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 36,280 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,183 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,183 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,073 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 6,219 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 67,377 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 171,035 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 34,207 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 206,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 206,000 Bonds: 5% $ 10,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 30,900 Mobilization 10% $ 20,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 30,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 299,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ayers St to Kostoryz Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 5,280 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,200 cy $ 16.91 $ 223,212 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 24,640 sy $ 11.70 $ 288,288 B8 JUnderseal 24,640 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 159,174 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 24,640 sy $ 18.99 $ 467,914 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 17,600 sy $ 50.00 $ 880,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,018,588 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 80,744 V Prep ROW 4% $ 80,744 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 60,558 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 100,929 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 706,506 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,929 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,929 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,372 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 121,115 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,112,082 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,130,670 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 826,134 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,957,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,957,000 Bonds: 5% $ 247,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 743,550 Mobilization 10% $ 495,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 743,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,188,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-13 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Kostoryz Rd to Carroll Ln roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,600 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,606 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,320 sy $ 11.70 $ 144,144 B8 JUnderseal 12,320 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 79,587 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,320 sy $ 18.99 $ 233,957 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,009,294 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,372 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,372 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,279 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 50,465 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 353,253 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,465 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,465 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,186 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 60,558 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,056,041 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,065,335 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 413,067 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,479,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,479,000 Bonds: 5% $ 123,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 371,850 Mobilization 10% $ 247,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 371,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,595,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ocean Dr to Santa Fe St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,403 cy $ 16.91 $ 57,539 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,453 sy $ 11.70 $ 75,504 B8 JUnderseal 6,453 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 41,689 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,453 sy $ 18.99 $ 122,549 B13 lConcrete Median 4,224 sf $ 53.96 $ 227,927 D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 701,207 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,048 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,048 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,036 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,060 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 245,423 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,060 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,060 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,024 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,072 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 455,785 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,156,992 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 231,398 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,389,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,389,000 Bonds: 5% $ 69,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 208,350 Mobilization 10% $ 138,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 208,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,014,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Santa Fe ST to S Staples St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,848 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,955 cy $ 16.91 $ 100,693 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,293 sy $ 11.70 $ 132,132 B8 JUnderseal 11,293 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 72,955 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,293 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 214,460 B13 lConcrete Median 7,392 sf $ 53.96 $ 398,872 D4 ISidewalk 6,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 308,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,227,113 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 49,085 V Prep ROW 4% $ 49,085 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,813 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 61,356 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 429,490 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,356 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,356 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,542 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 73,627 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 797,623 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,024,737 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 404,947 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,430,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,430,000 Bonds: 5% $ 121,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 364,500 Mobilization 10% $ 243,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 364,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,524,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Staples St to S Brownlee Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 634 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,394 cy $ 16.91 $ 40,476 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,576 sy $ 11.70 $ 53,539 B8 JUnderseal 4,576 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 29,561 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,576 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 86,898 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,112 sy $ 50.00 $ 105,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 316,074 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,643 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,643 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,482 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 15,804 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 110,626 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,804 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,804 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,321 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 18,964 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 205,448 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 521,522 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 104,304 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 626,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 626,000 Bonds: 5% $ 31,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 93,900 Mobilization 10% $ 62,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 93,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 908,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Brownlee Blvd to Baldwin Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,973 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,649 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,067 sy $ 11.70 $ 223,080 B8 Underseal 19,067 sy $ 6.46 $ 123,171 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,067 sy $ 18.99 $ 362,076 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,316,976 Major Construction Component Allowances: W Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,679 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,679 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,509 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,849 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 460,942 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,849 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,849 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,340 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,019 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,256,034 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,573,010 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 514,602 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,088,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,088,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,200 Mobilization 10% $ 308,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,478,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Staples St to Norton St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,973 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,649 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,067 sy $ 11.70 $ 223,080 B8 Underseal 19,067 sy $ 6.46 $ 123,171 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,067 sy $ 18.99 $ 362,076 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,316,976 Major Construction Component Allowances: W Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,679 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,679 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,509 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,849 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 460,942 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,849 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,849 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,340 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,019 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,256,034 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,573,010 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 514,602 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,088,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,088,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,200 Mobilization 10% $ 308,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,478,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Norton St to Brawner Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,848 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,981 cy $ 16.91 $ 118,054 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 13,347 sy $ 11.70 $ 156,156 B8 JUnderseal 13,347 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 86,219 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 13,347 sy $ 18.99 $ 253,453 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 308,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 921,883 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 36,875 V Prep ROW 4% $ 36,875 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,656 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 46,094 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 322,659 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,094 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,094 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,438 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 55,313 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 599,224 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,521,107 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 304,221 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,826,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,826,000 Bonds: 5% $ 91,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 273,900 Mobilization 10% $ 182,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 273,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,648,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Almeda St to S Staples St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,971 cy $ 16.91 $ 185,514 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,973 sy $ 11.70 $ 245,388 B8 JUnderseal 20,973 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 135,488 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,973 sy $ 18.99 $ 398,284 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,448,673 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 57,947 V Prep ROW 4% $ 57,947 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 43,460 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 72,434 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 507,036 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,434 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,434 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,973 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,920 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,341,638 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,790,311 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 558,062 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,349,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,349,000 Bonds: 5% $ 167,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 502,350 Mobilization 10% $ 334,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 502,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,856,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Morgan Ave to Elizabeth St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 528 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,995 cy $ 16.91 $ 33,730 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 44,616 B8 JUnderseal 3,813 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 24,634 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 72,415 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 1,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 88,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 263,395 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,536 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,536 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,902 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 13,170 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 92,188 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,170 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,170 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,268 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,804 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 171,207 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 434,602 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 86,920 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 522,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 522,000 Bonds: 5% $ 26,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 78,300 Mobilization 10% $ 52,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 78,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 757,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Elizabeth St to Booty St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 634 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,394 cy $ 16.91 $ 40,476 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,576 sy $ 11.70 $ 53,539 B8 JUnderseal 4,576 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 29,561 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,576 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 86,898 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,112 sy $ 50.00 $ 105,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 316,074 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,643 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,643 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,482 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 15,804 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 110,626 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,804 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,804 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,321 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 18,964 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 205,448 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 521,522 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 104,304 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 626,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 626,000 Bonds: 5% $ 31,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 93,900 Mobilization 10% $ 62,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 93,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 908,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Booty St to Ayers St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,992 cy $ 16.91 $ 50,595 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,720 sy $ 11.70 $ 66,924 B8 JUnderseal 5,720 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 36,951 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,720 sy $ 18.99 $ 108,623 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 395,093 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 15,804 V Prep ROW 4% $ 15,804 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 11,853 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 19,755 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 138,282 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,755 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,755 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,902 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 23,706 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 256,810 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 651,903 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 130,381 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 783,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 783,000 Bonds: 5% $ 39,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 117,450 Mobilization 10% $ 78,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 117,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,135,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ayers St to Louisiana Ave roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 3,432 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,965 cy $ 16.91 $ 219,244 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 24,787 sy $ 11.70 $ 290,004 B8 JUnderseal 24,787 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 160,122 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 24,787 sy $ 18.99 $ 470,699 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 11,440 sy $ 50.00 $ 572,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,712,068 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 68,483 V Prep ROW 4% $ 68,483 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 51,362 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 85,603 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 599,224 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,603 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,603 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 34,241 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 102,724 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,512,844 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,224,913 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 644,983 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,870,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,870,000 Bonds: 5% $ 193,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 580,500 Mobilization 10% $ 387,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 580,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,612,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-11 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Doddridge St to Carmel Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 4,424 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,255 cy $ 16.91 $ 241,054 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,036 sy $ 11.70 $ 316,316 B8 JUnderseal 27,036 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 174,650 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,036 sy $ 18.99 $ 513,405 B13 lConcrete Median 17,696 sf $ 53.96 $ 954,876 D4 ISidewalk 14,747 sy $ 50.00 $ 737,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,937,634 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 117,505 V Prep ROW 4% $ 117,505 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 88,129 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 146,882 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,028,172 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 146,882 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 146,882 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 58,753 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 176,258 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,309,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,247,097 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,049,419 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,297,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,297,000 Bonds: 5% $ 314,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 944,550 Mobilization 10% $ 629,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 944,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 9,131,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-S This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Carmel Pkwy to Everhart Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 685 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,207 cy $ 16.91 $ 37,324 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,186 sy $ 11.70 $ 48,978 B8 JUnderseal 4,186 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 27,042 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,186 sy $ 18.99 $ 79,494 B13 lConcrete Median 2,740 sf $ 53.96 $ 147,850 D4 ISidewalk 2,283 sy $ 50.00 $ 114,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 454,855 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,194 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,194 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,646 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,743 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 159,199 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,743 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,743 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,097 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 27,291 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 295,656 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 750,511 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 150,102 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 901,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 901,000 Bonds: 5% $ 45,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 135,150 Mobilization 10% $ 90,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 135,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,306,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 9-T This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Everhart Rd to Robert Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,552 cy $ 16.91 $ 43,154 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,840 sy $ 11.70 $ 56,628 B8 JUnderseal 4,840 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,266 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,840 sy $ 18.99 $ 91,912 B13 lConcrete Median 3,168 sf $ 53.96 $ 170,945 D4 ISidewalk 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 525,906 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,036 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,036 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,777 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,295 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 184,067 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,295 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,295 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,518 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,554 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 341,839 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 867,744 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 173,549 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,042,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,042,000 Bonds: 5% $ 52,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 156,300 Mobilization 10% $ 104,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 156,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,511,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inr0_rm9,tT0_rV ""_ J? Description: Project No. 9-W Project Number: 9-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Center Dr to Santa Fe St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 739 Service Area(s): Bayside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,793 cy $ 16.91 $ 47,222 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,339 sy $ 11.70 $ 62,462 B8 IUnderseal I 5,339 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 34,488 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,339 sy $ 18.99 $ 101,381 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,464 sy $ 50.00 $ 123,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 368,753 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 14,750 V Prep ROW 4% $ 14,750 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 11,063 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 18,438 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 129,064 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,438 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,438 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,375 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 22,125 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 239,690 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 608,443 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 121,689 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 731,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 731,000 Bonds: 5% $ 36,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 109,650 Mobilization 10% $ 73,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 109,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,060,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study FJENGINEERS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 10-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Everhart Rd to 125 ft east of Holmes Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,466 Service Area(s): Bayside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,398 cy $ 16.91 $ 125,100 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 13,974 sy $ 11.70 $ 163,496 B8 JUnderseal 13,974 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 90,272 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 13,974 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 265,366 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,220 sy $ 50.00 $ 411,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,055,234 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,209 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,209 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,657 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,762 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 369,332 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,762 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,762 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,105 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,314 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 685,902 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,741,137 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 348,227 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,090,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,090,000 Bonds: 5% $ 104,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 313,500 Mobilization 10% $ 209,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 313,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,031,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study ��PAPE-EERS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 10-B This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ennis Joslin Rd to 4132 ft east of Sand Dollar Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 9,343 Service Area(s): Bayside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 30,105 cy $ 16.91 $ 509,079 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 57,096 sy $ 11.70 $ 668,025 B8 JUnderseal 57,096 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 368,841 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 57,096 sy $ 18.99 $ 1,084,255 B13 lConcrete Median 37,372 sf $ 53.96 $ 2,016,593 D4 ISidewalk 31,143 sy $ 50.00 $ 1,557,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,203,960 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 248,158 V Prep ROW 4% $ 248,158 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 186,119 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 310,198 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 2,171,386 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 310,198 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 310,198 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 124,079 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 372,238 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 1,200,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,232,574 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 11,436,533 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,287,307 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 13,7241 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 13,724,000 Bonds: 5% $ 686,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 2,058,600 Mobilization 10% $ 1,372,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 2,058,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 19,900,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study ��PAPE-DEWS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 10-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Nile Dr.to Rodd Field Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Bayside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,019 cy $ 16.91 $ 101,785 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,370 sy $ 11.70 $ 133,024 B8 JUnderseal 11,370 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 73,448 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,370 sy $ 18.99 $ 215,909 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 858,565 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,343 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,343 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,757 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,928 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 300,498 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,928 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,928 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,171 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,514 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 558,067 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,416,633 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 283,327 Construction Cost TOT $ 1,700,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,700,000 Bonds: 5% $ 85,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 255,000 Mobilization 10% $ 170,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 255,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,465,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study ��PAPE-DABS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 10-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rodd Field Rd to Ennis Joslin Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,534 Service Area(s): Bayside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,603 cy $ 16.91 $ 128,570 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,362 sy $ 11.70 $ 168,031 B8 JUnderseal 14,362 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 92,776 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,362 sy $ 18.99 $ 272,727 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,448 sy $ 50.00 $ 422,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,084,504 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 43,380 V Prep ROW 4% $ 43,380 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 32,535 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 54,225 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 379,576 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 54,225 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 54,225 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,690 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 65,070 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 704,927 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,789,431 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 357,886 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,148,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,148,000 Bonds: 5% $ 107,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 322,200 Mobilization 10% $ 214,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 322,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,115,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study ��PAPE-DEWS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 10-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ocean Dr to Gaines St roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,690 Service Area(s): Bayside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,383 cy $ 16.91 $ 107,935 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,203 sy $ 11.70 $ 142,771 B8 JUnderseal 12,203 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 78,829 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,203 sy $ 18.99 $ 231,729 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,632 sy $ 50.00 $ 281,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 842,864 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,715 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,715 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,286 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,143 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 295,003 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,143 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,143 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,857 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,572 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 547,862 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,390,726 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 278,145 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,669,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,669,000 Bonds: 5% $ 83,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 250,350 Mobilization 10% $ 166,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 250,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,420,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study FJENGINEERS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 10-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Robert Dr to Airline Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,115 Service Area(s): Bayside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,615 cy $ 16.91 $ 128,769 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 14,191 sy $ 13.78 $ 195,558 B8 JUnderseal 14,191 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 91,677 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 14,884 sy $ 5.65 $ 84,093 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 10,384 sy $ 50.00 $ 519,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,019,297 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,772 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,772 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,579 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 50,965 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 356,754 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,965 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,965 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,386 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 61,158 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,062,543 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,081,840 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 416,368 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,499,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,499,000 Bonds: 5% $ 124,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 374,850 Mobilization 10% $ 249,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 374,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,624,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: SH 358 to Civitan Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,580 cy $ 16.91 $ 128,173 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,491 sy $ 11.70 $ 169,541 B8 JUnderseal 14,491 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 93,610 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,491 sy $ 18.99 $ 275,178 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,000,902 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,036 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,036 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,027 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 50,045 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 350,316 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,045 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,045 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,018 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 60,054 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 650,586 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,651,488 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 330,298 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,982,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,982,000 Bonds: 5% $ 99,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 297,300 Mobilization 10% $ 198,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 297,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,874,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-B This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Civitan Dr to Holly Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,954 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,380 cy $ 16.91 $ 124,800 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,109 sy $ 11.70 $ 165,079 B8 JUnderseal 14,109 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 91,146 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,109 sy $ 18.99 $ 267,936 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,512 sy $ 50.00 $ 325,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 974,562 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 38,982 V Prep ROW 4% $ 38,982 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,237 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 48,728 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 341,097 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,728 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 48,728 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,491 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,474 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 633,465 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,608,027 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 321,605 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,930,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,930,000 Bonds: 5% $ 96,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 289,500 Mobilization 10% $ 193,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 289,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,799,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Carroll Ln to Weber Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,600 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,606 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,320 sy $ 11.70 $ 144,144 B8 JUnderseal 12,320 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 79,587 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,320 sy $ 18.99 $ 233,957 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,009,294 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,372 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,372 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,279 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 50,465 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 353,253 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,465 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,465 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,186 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 60,558 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,056,041 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,065,335 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 413,067 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,479,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,479,000 Bonds: 5% $ 123,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 371,850 Mobilization 10% $ 247,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 371,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,595,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: SH 358 to Tiger Ln roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,267 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,083 cy $ 16.91 $ 69,047 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,744 sy $ 11.70 $ 90,605 B8 JUnderseal 7,744 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 50,026 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,744 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 147,059 B13 lConcrete Median 5,069 sf $ 53.96 $ 273,512 D4 ISidewalk 4,224 sy $ 50.00 $ 211,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 841,449 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,658 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,658 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,243 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,072 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 294,507 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,072 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,072 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,829 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,487 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 546,942 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,388,391 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 277,678 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,667,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,667,000 Bonds: 5% $ 83,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 250,050 Mobilization 10% $ 166,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 250,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,417,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Tiger Ln to Capri Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,104 cy $ 16.91 $ 86,309 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,680 sy $ 11.70 $ 113,256 B8 Underseal 9,680 sy $ 6.46 $ 62,533 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,680 sy $ 18.99 $ 183,823 B13 lConcrete Median 6,336 sf $ 53.96 $ 341,891 D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,051,811 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,554 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 368,134 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,036 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,109 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 683,677 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,488 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,098 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 104,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 312,450 Mobilization 10% $ 208,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 312,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,020,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Capri Dr to Holly Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,003 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,233 cy $ 16.91 $ 54,662 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,131 sy $ 11.70 $ 71,729 B8 JUnderseal 6,131 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 39,604 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,131 sy $ 18.99 $ 116,421 B13 lConcrete Median 4,013 sf $ 53.96 $ 216,531 D4 ISidewalk 3,344 sy $ 50.00 $ 167,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 666,147 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,646 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,646 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,984 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 33,307 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 233,151 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,307 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,307 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,323 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,969 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 432,996 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,099,143 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 219,829 Construction Cost TOT $ 1,319,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,319,000 Bonds: 5% $ 65,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 197,850 Mobilization 10% $ 131,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 197,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,913,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Holly Rd to Schanen Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,109 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,573 cy $ 16.91 $ 60,416 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,776 sy $ 11.70 $ 79,279 B8 JUnderseal 6,776 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 43,773 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,776 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 128,676 B13 lConcrete Median 4,435 sf $ 53.96 $ 239,323 D4 ISidewalk 3,696 sy $ 50.00 $ 184,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 736,268 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,451 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,451 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,088 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,813 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 257,694 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,813 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,813 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,725 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,176 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 478,574 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,214,842 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 242,968 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,458,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,458,000 Bonds: 5% $ 72,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 218,700 Mobilization 10% $ 145,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 218,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,114,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Schanen Blvd to Wickersham St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,323 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,486 cy $ 16.91 $ 126,586 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,197 sy $ 11.70 $ 166,109 B8 JUnderseal 14,197 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 91,715 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,197 sy $ 18.99 $ 269,607 B13 lConcrete Median 9,293 sf $ 53.96 $ 501,439 D4 ISidewalk 7,744 sy $ 50.00 $ 387,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,542,656 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 61,706 V Prep ROW 4% $ 61,706 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 77,133 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 539,930 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,133 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,133 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 30,853 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 92,559 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,002,727 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,545,383 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 509,077 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,055,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,055,000 Bonds: 5% $ 152,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 458,250 Mobilization 10% $ 305,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 458,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,430,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Wickersham St to Capitol Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 845 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,722 cy $ 16.91 $ 46,031 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,163 sy $ 11.70 $ 60,403 B8 Underseal 5,163 sy $ 6.46 $ 33,351 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,163 sy $ 18.99 $ 98,039 B13 lConcrete Median 3,379 sf $ 53.96 $ 182,342 D4 ISidewalk 2,816 sy $ 50.00 $ 140,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 560,966 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,439 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,439 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,829 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,048 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 196,338 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,048 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,048 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,219 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,658 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 364,628 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 925,594 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 185,119 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,111,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,111,000 Bonds: 5% $ 55,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 166,650 Mobilization 10% $ 111,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 166,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,611,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Capitol Dr to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,403 cy $ 16.91 $ 57,539 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,453 sy $ 11.70 $ 75,504 B8 JUnderseal 6,453 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 41,689 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,453 sy $ 18.99 $ 122,549 B13 lConcrete Median 4,224 sf $ 53.96 $ 227,927 D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 701,207 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,048 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,048 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,036 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,060 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 245,423 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,060 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,060 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,024 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,072 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 455,785 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,156,992 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 231,398 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,389,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,389,000 Bonds: 5% $ 69,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 208,350 Mobilization 10% $ 138,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 208,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,014,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Saratoga Blvd to Acushnet Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 792 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,652 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,755 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,040 sy $ 11.70 $ 82,368 B8 JUnderseal 7,040 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 45,478 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,040 sy $ 18.99 $ 133,690 B13 lConcrete Median 3,960 sf $ 53.96 $ 213,682 D4 ISidewalk 2,640 sy $ 50.00 $ 132,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 668,973 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,759 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,759 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,069 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 33,449 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 234,141 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,449 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,449 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,379 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,138 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 434,832 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,103,805 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 220,761 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,325,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,325,000 Bonds: 5% $ 66,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 198,750 Mobilization 10% $ 132,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 198,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,921,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Acushnet Drto Bratton Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,848 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,521 cy $ 16.91 $ 144,096 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,427 sy $ 11.70 $ 192,192 B8 JUnderseal 16,427 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 106,116 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,427 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 311,942 B13 lConcrete Median 9,240 sf $ 53.96 $ 498,590 D4 ISidewalk 6,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 308,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,560,937 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 62,437 V Prep ROW 4% $ 62,437 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,828 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 78,047 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 546,328 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 78,047 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 78,047 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,219 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 93,656 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,014,609 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,575,546 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 515,109 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,091,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,091,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,650 Mobilization 10% $ 309,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,482,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Bratton Rd to Aaron Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,087 cy $ 16.91 $ 102,926 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,733 sy $ 11.70 $ 137,280 B8 Underseal 11,733 sy $ 6.46 $ 75,797 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,733 sy $ 18.99 $ 222,816 B13 lConcrete Median 6,600 sf $ 53.96 $ 356,136 D4 ISidewalk 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,114,955 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 44,598 V Prep ROW 4% $ 44,598 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 33,449 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 55,748 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 390,234 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 55,748 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 55,748 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,299 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 66,897 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 724,721 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,839,676 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 367,935 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,208,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,208,000 Bonds: 5% $ 110,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 331,200 Mobilization 10% $ 220,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 331,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,202,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 11-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Aaron Dr to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,426 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,574 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,160 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,672 sy $ 11.70 $ 148,262 B8 JUnderseal 12,672 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 81,861 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,672 sy $ 18.99 $ 240,641 B13 lConcrete Median 7,128 sf $ 53.96 $ 384,627 D4 ISidewalk 4,752 sy $ 50.00 $ 237,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,204,151 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 48,166 V Prep ROW 4% $ 48,166 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,125 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 60,208 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 421,453 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,208 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,208 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,083 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 72,249 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 782,698 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,986,850 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 397,370 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,385,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,385,000 Bonds: 5% $ 119,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 357,750 Mobilization 10% $ 238,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 357,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,458,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 11-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Yorktown Blvd to Oso Creek roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,252 cy $ 16.91 $ 156,447 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,835 sy $ 11.70 $ 208,666 B8 JUnderseal 17,835 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 115,212 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,835 sy $ 18.99 $ 338,680 B13 lConcrete Median 10,032 sf $ 53.96 $ 541,327 D4 ISidewalk 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,694,731 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 67,789 V Prep ROW 4% $ 67,789 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 50,842 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 84,737 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 593,156 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 84,737 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 84,737 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 33,895 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 101,684 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,101,575 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,796,307 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 559,261 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,356,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,356,000 Bonds: 5% $ 167,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 503,400 Mobilization 10% $ 335,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 503,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,866,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inr0_rm9,tT0_rV "_ Description: Project No. 11_Q Project Number: 11-Q This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Wickersham St(PR Segment)to Masterson Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,872 cy $ 16.91 $ 65,476 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,216 sy $ 13.78 $ 99,436 B8 IUnderseal I 7,216 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 46,615 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,568 sy $ 5.65 $ 42,759 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 518,287 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,731 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,731 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,549 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,914 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 181,400 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,914 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,914 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,366 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,097 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 336,886 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 855,173 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 171,035 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,027,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,027,000 Bonds: 5% $ 51,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 154,050 Mobilization 10% $ 102,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 154,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,489,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 11-T Project Number: 11-T This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Carmago Dr to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,227 cy $ 16.91 $ 54,563 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,013 sy $ 13.78 $ 82,864 B8 IUnderseal I 6,013 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 38,846 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,307 sy $ 5.65 $ 35,633 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 431,905 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,276 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,276 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,957 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 21,595 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 151,167 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,638 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,914 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 712,644 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 142,529 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 856,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 856,000 Bonds: 5% $ 42,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 128,400 Mobilization 10% $ 85,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 128,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,241,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 11_U Project Number: 11-U This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Glenway St to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,373 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,356 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,745 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,254 sy $ 13.78 $ 86,178 B8 IUnderseal I 6,254 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 40,400 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,559 sy $ 5.65 $ 37,058 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,576 sy $ 50.00 $ 228,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 449,182 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,967 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,967 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,475 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,459 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 157,214 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,459 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,459 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,984 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 26,951 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 291,968 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 741,150 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 148,230 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 890,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 890,000 Bonds: 5% $ 44,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 133,500 Mobilization 10% $ 89,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 133,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,291,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 11_V Project Number: 11-V This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Carroll Ln W to Carroll Ln E roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 211 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 516 cy $ 16.91 $ 8,730 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 962 sy $ 13.78 $ 13,258 B8 IUnderseal I 962 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 6,215 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,009 sy $ 5.65 $ 5,701 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 704 sy $ 50.00 $ 35,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 69,105 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 2,764 V Prep ROW 4% $ 2,764 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 2,073 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 3,455 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 24,187 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 3,455 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 3,455 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,382 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 4,146 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 44,918 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 114,023 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 22,805 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 137,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 137,000 Bonds: 5% $ 6,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 20,550 Mobilization 10% $ 13,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 20,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 199,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 11_W Project Number: 11-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Carroll Ln E to Norchester Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 634 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,549 cy $ 16.91 $ 26,190 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,886 sy $ 13.78 $ 39,775 B8 IUnderseal I 2,886 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 18,646 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,027 sy $ 5.65 $ 17,104 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,112 sy $ 50.00 $ 105,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 207,315 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 8,293 V Prep ROW 4% $ 8,293 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 6,219 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 10,366 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 72,560 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,366 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,366 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,146 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 12,439 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 134,755 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 342,069 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 68,414 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 411,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 411,000 Bonds: 5% $ 20,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 61,650 Mobilization 10% $ 41,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 61,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 596,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 11_X Project Number: 11-X This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Bratton Rd to Weber Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,848 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,517 cy $ 16.91 $ 76,388 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,419 sy $ 13.78 $ 116,009 B8 IUnderseal I 8,419 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 54,385 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,829 sy $ 5.65 $ 49,886 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 308,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 604,668 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,187 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,187 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,140 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 30,233 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 211,634 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,233 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,233 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,093 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 36,280 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 393,034 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 997,702 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 199,540 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,198,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,198,000 Bonds: 5% $ 59,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 179,700 Mobilization 10% $ 119,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 179,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,737,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 11-Y Project Number: 11-Y This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Saratoga Blvd to Brezina Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 5,597 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 25,807 cy $ 16.91 $ 436,404 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 49,749 sy $ 11.70 $ 582,067 B8 IUnderseal I 49,749 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 321,381 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 49,749 sy $ 18.99 $ 944,740 B13 lConcrete Median 27,984 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,510,017 D4 ISidewalk I 18,656 sy $ 50.00 $ 932,800 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,727,409 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 189,096 V Prep ROW 4% $ 189,096 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 141,822 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 236,370 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,654,593 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 236,370 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 236,370 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 94,548 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 283,645 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,872,816 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,600,224 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,720,045 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 10,321,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 10,321,000 Bonds: 5% $ 516,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,548,150 Mobilization 10% $ 1,032,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 1,548,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 14,965,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 11_Z Project Number: 11-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Brezina Rd to Webber Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,162 Service Area(s): Southside 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,356 cy $ 16.91 $ 90,574 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,325 sy $ 11.70 $ 120,806 B8 IUnderseal I 10,325 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 66,702 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,325 sy $ 18.99 $ 196,078 B13 lConcrete Median 5,808 sf $ 53.96 $ 313,400 D4 ISidewalk I 3,872 sy $ 50.00 $ 193,600 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 981,160 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 39,246 V Prep ROW 4% $ 39,246 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 29,435 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 49,058 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 343,406 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,058 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,058 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,623 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 58,870 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 637,754 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,618,914 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 323,783 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,943,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,943,000 Bonds: 5% $ 97,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 291,450 Mobilization 10% $ 194,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 291,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,817,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: SH 358 to Tiger Ln roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,253 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,924 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,067 sy $ 11.70 $ 94,380 B8 JUnderseal 8,067 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 52,111 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,067 sy $ 18.99 $ 153,186 B13 lConcrete Median 5,280 sf $ 53.96 $ 284,909 D4 ISidewalk 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 876,509 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,060 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,060 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,295 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,825 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 306,778 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,825 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,825 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,530 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,591 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 569,731 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,446,240 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 289,248 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,736,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,736,000 Bonds: 5% $ 86,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 260,400 Mobilization 10% $ 173,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 260,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,517,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Tiger Ln to Capri Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,104 cy $ 16.91 $ 86,309 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,680 sy $ 11.70 $ 113,256 B8 Underseal 9,680 sy $ 6.46 $ 62,533 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,680 sy $ 18.99 $ 183,823 B13 lConcrete Median 6,336 sf $ 53.96 $ 341,891 D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,051,811 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,554 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 368,134 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,036 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,109 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 683,677 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,488 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,098 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 104,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 312,450 Mobilization 10% $ 208,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 312,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,020,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Capri Dr to Holly Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,015 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,271 cy $ 16.91 $ 55,305 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,203 sy $ 11.70 $ 72,573 B8 JUnderseal 6,203 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 40,070 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,203 sy $ 18.99 $ 117,791 B13 lConcrete Median 4,060 sf $ 53.96 $ 219,078 D4 ISidewalk 3,383 sy $ 50.00 $ 169,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 673,983 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,959 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,959 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,219 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 33,699 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 235,894 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,699 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,699 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,480 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,439 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 438,089 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,112,071 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 222,414 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,335,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,335,000 Bonds: 5% $ 66,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 200,250 Mobilization 10% $ 133,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 200,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,936,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Holly Rd to Schanen Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,111 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,580 cy $ 16.91 $ 60,536 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,789 sy $ 11.70 $ 79,437 B8 JUnderseal 6,789 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 43,860 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,789 sy $ 18.99 $ 128,932 B13 lConcrete Median 4,444 sf $ 53.96 $ 239,798 D4 ISidewalk 3,703 sy $ 50.00 $ 185,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 737,729 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 29,509 V Prep ROW 4% $ 29,509 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,132 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 36,886 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 258,205 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,886 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 36,886 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,755 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 44,264 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 479,524 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,217,252 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 243,450 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,461,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,461,000 Bonds: 5% $ 73,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 219,150 Mobilization 10% $ 146,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 219,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,118,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Schanen Blvd to Wickersham St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,347 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,563 cy $ 16.91 $ 127,883 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,343 sy $ 11.70 $ 167,811 B8 Underseal 14,343 sy $ 6.46 $ 92,654 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,343 sy $ 18.99 $ 272,369 B13 lConcrete Median 9,388 sf $ 53.96 $ 506,576 D4 ISidewalk 7,823 sy $ 50.00 $ 391,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,558,460 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 62,338 V Prep ROW 4% $ 62,338 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,754 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 77,923 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 545,461 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,923 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,923 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,169 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 93,508 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,012,999 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,571,459 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 514,292 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,086,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,086,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 462,900 Mobilization 10% $ 308,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 462,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,475,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Wickersham St to Capitol Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 842 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,713 cy $ 16.91 $ 45,879 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,146 sy $ 11.70 $ 60,203 B8 JUnderseal 5,146 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 33,240 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,146 sy $ 18.99 $ 97,714 B13 lConcrete Median 3,368 sf $ 53.96 $ 181,737 D4 ISidewalk 2,807 sy $ 50.00 $ 140,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 559,107 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,364 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,364 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,773 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 27,955 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 195,687 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,955 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 27,955 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,182 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,546 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 363,419 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 922,526 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 184,505 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,108,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,108,000 Bonds: 5% $ 55,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 166,200 Mobilization 10% $ 110,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 166,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,607,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Capitol Dr to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,032 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,325 cy $ 16.91 $ 56,231 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,307 sy $ 11.70 $ 73,788 B8 Underseal 6,307 sy $ 6.46 $ 40,741 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,307 sy $ 18.99 $ 119,764 B13 lConcrete Median 4,128 sf $ 53.96 $ 222,747 D4 ISidewalk 3,440 sy $ 50.00 $ 172,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 685,271 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 27,471- V Prep ROW 4% $ 27,411 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,558 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 34,264 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 239,845 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,264 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,264 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,705 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 41,116 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 445,426 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,130,697 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 226,139 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,357,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,357,000 Bonds: 5% $ 67,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 203,550 Mobilization 10% $ 135,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 203,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,968,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Saratoga Blvd to Acushnet Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 804 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,707 cy $ 16.91 $ 62,691 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,147 sy $ 11.70 $ 83,616 B8 Underseal 7,147 sy $ 6.46 $ 46,167 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,147 sy $ 18.99 $ 135,715 B13 lConcrete Median 4,020 sf $ 53.96 $ 216,919 D4 ISidewalk 2,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 134,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 679,109 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 27,164 V Prep ROW 4% $ 27,164 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,373 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 33,955 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 237,688 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,955 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,955 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,582 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,747 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 441,421 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,120,530 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 224,106 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,345,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,345,000 Bonds: 5% $ 67,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 201,750 Mobilization 10% $ 134,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 201,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,950,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Acushnet Drto Bratton Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,840 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,484 cy $ 16.91 $ 143,472 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,356 sy $ 11.70 $ 191,360 B8 Underseal 16,356 sy $ 6.46 $ 105,657 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,356 sy $ 18.99 $ 310,592 B13 lConcrete Median 9,200 sf $ 53.96 $ 496,432 D4 ISidewalk 6,133 sy $ 50.00 $ 306,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,554,180 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 62,167 V Prep ROW 4% $ 62,167 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 46,625 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 77,709 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 543,963 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,709 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 77,709 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,084 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 93,251 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,010,217 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,564,396 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 512,879 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,078,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,078,000 Bonds: 5% $ 153,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 461,700 Mobilization 10% $ 307,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 461,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,463,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Bratton Rd to Aaron Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,313 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,054 cy $ 16.91 $ 102,380 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,671 sy $ 11.70 $ 136,552 B8 JUnderseal 11,671 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 75,395 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,671 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 221,634 B13 lConcrete Median 6,565 sf $ 53.96 $ 354,247 D4 ISidewalk 4,377 sy $ 50.00 $ 218,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,109,042 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 44,362 V Prep ROW 4% $ 44,362 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 33,271 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 55,452 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 388,165 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 55,452 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 55,452 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,181 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 66,543 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 720,877 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,829,920 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 365,984 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,196,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,196,000 Bonds: 5% $ 109,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 329,400 Mobilization 10% $ 219,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 329,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,184,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Aaron Dr to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,451 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,691 cy $ 16.91 $ 113,140 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,898 sy $ 11.70 $ 150,904 B8 Underseal 12,898 sy $ 6.46 $ 83,320 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,898 sy $ 18.99 $ 244,929 B13 lConcrete Median 7,255 sf $ 53.96 $ 391,480 D4 ISidewalk 4,837 sy $ 50.00 $ 241,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,225,606 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 49,024 V Prep ROW 4% $ 49,024 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,768 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 61,280 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 428,962 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,280 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,280 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,512 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 73,536 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 796,644 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,022,249 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 404,450 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,427,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,427,000 Bonds: 5% $ 121,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 364,050 Mobilization 10% $ 242,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 364,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,519,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Weber Rd to Sun Valley Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,767 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,148 cy $ 16.91 $ 137,780 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,707 sy $ 11.70 $ 183,768 B8 JUnderseal 15,707 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 101,465 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,707 sy $ 18.99 $ 298,270 B13 lConcrete Median 8,835 sf $ 53.96 $ 476,737 D4 ISidewalk 5,890 sy $ 50.00 $ 294,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,492,519 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 59,701 V Prep ROW 4% $ 59,701 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,776 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 74,626 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 522,382 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 74,626 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 74,626 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,850 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 89,551 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 970,137 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,462,657 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 492,531 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,956,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,956,000 Bonds: 5% $ 147,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 443,400 Mobilization 10% $ 295,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 443,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,286,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 12-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sun Valley Dr to Oso Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,909 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 18,025 cy $ 16.91 $ 304,800 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 34,747 sy $ 11.70 $ 406,536 B8 JUnderseal 34,747 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 224,463 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 34,747 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 659,839 B13 lConcrete Median 19,545 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,054,648 D4 ISidewalk 13,030 sy $ 50.00 $ 651,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,301,787 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 132,071 V Prep ROW 4% $ 132,071 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 99,054 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 165,089 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,155,625 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 165,089 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 165,089 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 66,036 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 198,107 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,546,161 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,847,948 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,169,590 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,018,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,018,000 Bonds: 5% $ 350,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,052,700 Mobilization 10% $ 701,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,052,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,176,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Oso Pkwy to Everhart Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,390 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,021 cy $ 16.91 $ 186,358 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 21,244 sy $ 11.70 $ 248,560 B8 JUnderseal 21,244 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 137,239 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 21,244 sy $ 18.99 $ 403,432 B13 lConcrete Median 11,950 sf $ 53.96 $ 644,822 D4 ISidewalk 7,967 sy $ 50.00 $ 398,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,018,744 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 80,750 V Prep ROW 4% $ 80,750 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 60,562 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 100,937 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 706,560 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,937 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,937 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,375 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 121,125 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,312,184 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,330,928 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 666,186 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,998,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,998,000 Bonds: 5% $ 199,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 599,700 Mobilization 10% $ 399,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 599,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,797,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 12-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Everhart Rd to Lipes Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,190 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,098 cy $ 16.91 $ 170,763 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,467 sy $ 11.70 $ 227,760 B8 JUnderseal 19,467 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 125,755 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,467 sy $ 18.99 $ 369,672 B13 lConcrete Median 10,950 sf $ 53.96 $ 590,862 D4 ISidewalk 7,300 sy $ 50.00 $ 365,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,849,811 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 73,992 V Prep ROW 4% $ 73,992 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 55,494 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 92,491 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 647,434 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 92,491 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 92,491 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 36,996 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 110,989 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,202,377 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,052,189 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 610,438 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,663,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,663,000 Bonds: 5% $ 183,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 549,450 Mobilization 10% $ 366,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 549,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,311,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-R This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lipes Blvd to S Staples St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,115 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,364 cy $ 16.91 $ 242,889 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,689 sy $ 11.70 $ 323,960 B8 Underseal 27,689 sy $ 6.46 $ 178,870 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,689 sy $ 18.99 $ 525,812 B13 lConcrete Median 15,575 sf $ 53.96 $ 840,427 D4 ISidewalk 10,383 sy $ 50.00 $ 519,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,631,125 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 105,245 V Prep ROW 4% $ 105,245 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 78,934 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 131,556 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 920,894 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 131,556 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 131,556 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 52,622 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 157,867 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,110,231 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,741,356 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 948,271 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,690,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,690,000 Bonds: 5% $ 284,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 853,500 Mobilization 10% $ 569,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 853,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,251,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-S This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Staples St to Loire Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,397 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,053 cy $ 16.91 $ 186,903 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 21,307 sy $ 11.70 $ 249,288 B8 Underseal 21,307 sy $ 6.46 $ 137,641 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 21,307 sy $ 18.99 $ 404,614 B13 lConcrete Median 11,985 sf $ 53.96 $ 646,711 D4 ISidewalk 7,990 sy $ 50.00 $ 399,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,024,657 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 80,986 V Prep ROW 4% $ 80,986 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 60,740 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 101,233 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 708,630 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 101,233 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 101,233 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,493 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 121,479 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,316,027 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,340,684 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 668,137 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,009,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,009,000 Bonds: 5% $ 200,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 601,350 Mobilization 10% $ 400,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 601,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,813,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-T This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Loire Blvd to Cimarron Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,391 cy $ 16.91 $ 226,436 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 302,016 B8 JUnderseal 25,813 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 166,754 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 490,195 B13 lConcrete Median 14,520 sf $ 53.96 $ 783,499 D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,452,901 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,116 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,116 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 73,587 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 122,645 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 858,515 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,058 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 147,174 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,994,385 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,447,286 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 889,457 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,337,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,337,000 Bonds: 5% $ 266,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 800,550 Mobilization 10% $ 533,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 800,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,739,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-U This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Woolridge Rd to Congressional Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,515 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,723 cy $ 16.91 $ 96,782 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,942 sy $ 11.70 $ 128,018 B8 JUnderseal 10,942 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 70,683 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,942 sy $ 18.99 $ 207,782 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,050 sy $ 50.00 $ 252,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 755,764 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 30,231 V Prep ROW 4% $ 30,231 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,673 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 37,788 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 264,518 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,788 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,788 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,115 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 45,346 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 491,247 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,247,011 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 249,402 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,497,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,497,000 Bonds: 5% $ 74,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 224,550 Mobilization 10% $ 149,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 224,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,171,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-V This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Congressional Dr to Saratoga Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,863 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,038 cy $ 16.91 $ 119,013 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 13,455 sy $ 11.70 $ 157,424 B8 JUnderseal 13,455 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 86,919 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 13,455 sy $ 18.99 $ 255,510 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,210 sy $ 50.00 $ 310,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 929,366 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 37,175 V Prep ROW 4% $ 37,175 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,881 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 46,468 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 325,278 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,468 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,468 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,587 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 55,762 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 604,088 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,533,454 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 306,691 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,841,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,841,000 Bonds: 5% $ 92,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 276,150 Mobilization 10% $ 184,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 276,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,669,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AC This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Saratoga Blvd to Timbergate Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,662 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,275 cy $ 16.91 $ 207,566 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,662 sy $ 11.70 $ 276,848 B8 Underseal 23,662 sy $ 6.46 $ 152,858 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,662 sy $ 18.99 $ 449,346 B13 lConcrete Median 13,310 sf $ 53.96 $ 718,208 D4 ISidewalk 8,873 sy $ 50.00 $ 443,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,248,492 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,940 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,940 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 67,455 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 112,425 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 786,972 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 112,425 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 112,425 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,970 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 134,910 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,861,520 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,110,012 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 822,002 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,933,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,933,000 Bonds: 5% $ 246,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 739,950 Mobilization 10% $ 493,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 739,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,153,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AD This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Timbergate Dr to Lipes Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,644 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,192 cy $ 16.91 $ 206,163 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,502 sy $ 11.70 $ 274,976 B8 JUnderseal 23,502 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 151,824 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,502 sy $ 18.99 $ 446,307 B13 lConcrete Median 13,220 sf $ 53.96 $ 713,351 D4 ISidewalk 8,813 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,233,288 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,332 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,332 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,999 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 111,664 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 781,651 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,664 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,664 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,666 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 133,997 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,851,637 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,084,926 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 816,985 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,902,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,902,000 Bonds: 5% $ 245,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 735,300 Mobilization 10% $ 490,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 735,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,108,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AE This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lipes Blvd to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,644 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,192 cy $ 16.91 $ 206,163 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,502 sy $ 11.70 $ 274,976 B8 JUnderseal 23,502 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 151,824 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,502 sy $ 18.99 $ 446,307 B13 lConcrete Median 13,220 sf $ 53.96 $ 713,351 D4 ISidewalk 8,813 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,233,288 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 89,332 V Prep ROW 4% $ 89,332 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,999 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 111,664 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 781,651 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,664 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 111,664 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,666 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 133,997 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,851,637 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,084,926 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 816,985 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,902,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,902,000 Bonds: 5% $ 245,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 735,300 Mobilization 10% $ 490,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 735,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,108,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AF This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Staples St to Gingerberry Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,437 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,311 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,899 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,143 sy $ 11.70 $ 95,273 B8 JUnderseal 8,143 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 52,604 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,143 sy $ 18.99 $ 154,636 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,790 sy $ 50.00 $ 239,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 614,911 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,596 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,596 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,447 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 30,746 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 215,219 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,746 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,746 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,298 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 36,895 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 399,692 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,014,604 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 202,921 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,218,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,218,000 Bonds: 5% $ 60,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 182,700 Mobilization 10% $ 121,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 182,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,766,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AG This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Gingerberry Dr to Spanish Wood Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 627 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,881 cy $ 16.91 $ 31,808 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 3,553 sy $ 11.70 $ 41,570 B8 JUnderseal 3,553 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 22,952 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 3,553 sy $ 18.99 $ 67,471 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 2,090 sy $ 50.00 $ 104,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 268,302 Major Construction Component Allowances: 1A Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,732 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,732 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 8,049 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 13,415 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 93,906 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,415 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,415 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,366 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 16,098 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 174,396 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 442,698 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 88,540 Construction Cost TOT $ 532,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 532,000 Bonds: 5% $ 26,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 79,800 Mobilization 10% $ 53,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 79,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 771,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AH This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Spanish Wood Dr to Brockhampton St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,918 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,754 cy $ 16.91 $ 97,300 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,869 sy $ 11.70 $ 127,163 B8 JUnderseal 10,869 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 70,212 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,869 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 206,396 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,393 sy $ 50.00 $ 319,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 820,738 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 32,830 V Prep ROW 4% $ 32,830 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,622 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 41,037 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 287,258 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,037 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,037 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,415 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 49,244 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 533,480 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,354,217 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 270,843 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,626,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,626,000 Bonds: 5% $ 81,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 243,900 Mobilization 10% $ 162,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 243,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,358,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 12-AI This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Brockhampton St to Cimarron Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,359 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,077 cy $ 16.91 $ 68,942 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,701 sy $ 11.70 $ 90,102 B8 JUnderseal 7,701 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 49,748 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,701 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 146,242 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,530 sy $ 50.00 $ 226,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 581,534 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,261 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,261 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,446 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,077 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 203,537 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,077 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,077 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,631 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 34,892 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 377,997 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 959,531 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 191,906 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,152,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,152,000 Bonds: 5% $ 57,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 172,800 Mobilization 10% $ 115,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 172,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,670,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 12-AJ Project Number: 12-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Commonwealth Dr toTimbergate Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 922 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,254 cy $ 16.91 $ 38,111 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,200 sy $ 13.78 $ 57,879 B8 IUnderseal I 4,200 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 27,133 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 4,405 sy $ 5.65 $ 24,889 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,073 sy $ 50.00 $ 153,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 301,679 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,067 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,067 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,050 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 15,084 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 105,588 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,084 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,084 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,034 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 18,101 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 196,092 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 497,771 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 99,554 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 598,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 598,000 Bonds: 5% $ 29,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 89,700 Mobilization 10% $ 59,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 89,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 867,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 12-AK Project Number: 12-AK This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Saratoga Blvd to Dunbarton Oak Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,005 Service Area(s): Southside 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,457 cy $ 16.91 $ 41,542 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,578 sy $ 13.78 $ 63,089 B8 IUnderseal I 4,578 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 29,576 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 4,802 sy $ 5.65 $ 27,129 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,350 sy $ 50.00 $ 167,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 328,837 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 13,153 V Prep ROW 4% $ 13,153 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,865 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 16,442 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 115,093 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,442 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,442 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,577 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 19,730 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 213,744 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 542,581 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 108,516 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 652,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 652,000 Bonds: 5% $ 32,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 97,800 Mobilization 10% $ 65,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 97,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 945,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Weber Rd to Sun Valley Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,742 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,034 cy $ 16.91 $ 135,862 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,488 sy $ 11.70 $ 181,210 B8 JUnderseal 15,488 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 100,052 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,488 sy $ 18.99 $ 294,117 B13 lConcrete Median 8,712 sf $ 53.96 $ 470,100 D4 ISidewalk 5,808 sy $ 50.00 $ 290,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,471,740 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,870 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,870 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,152 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,587 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 515,109 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,587 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,435 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,304 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 956,631 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,428,372 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 485,674 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,915,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,915,000 Bonds: 5% $ 145,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 437,250 Mobilization 10% $ 291,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 437,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,227,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-B This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sun Valley Dr to Oso Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,907 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 18,017 cy $ 16.91 $ 304,660 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 34,731 sy $ 11.70 $ 406,349 B8 JUnderseal 34,731 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 224,360 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 34,731 sy $ 18.99 $ 659,535 B13 lConcrete Median 19,536 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,054,163 D4 ISidewalk 13,024 sy $ 50.00 $ 651,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,300,266 Major Construction Component Allowances: - Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 132,011 V Prep ROW 4% $ 132,011 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 99,008 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 165,013 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,155,093 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 165,013 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 165,013 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 66,005 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 198,016 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,545,173 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,845,440 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,169,088 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,015,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,015,000 Bonds: 5% $ 350,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,052,250 Mobilization 10% $ 701,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,052,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,172,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Oso Pkwy to Everhart Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,376 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,956 cy $ 16.91 $ 185,266 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 21,120 sy $ 11.70 $ 247,104 B8 JUnderseal 21,120 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 136,435 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 21,120 sy $ 18.99 $ 401,069 B13 lConcrete Median 11,880 sf $ 53.96 $ 641,045 D4 ISidewalk 7,920 sy $ 50.00 $ 396,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,006,919 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 80,277 V Prep ROW 4% $ 80,277 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 60,208 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 100,346 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 702,422 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,346 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,346 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,138 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 120,415 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,304,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,311,416 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 662,283 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,974,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,974,000 Bonds: 5% $ 198,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 596,100 Mobilization 10% $ 397,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 596,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,762,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Everhart Rd to Lipes Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,165 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,982 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,798 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,243 sy $ 11.70 $ 225,139 B8 JUnderseal 19,243 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 124,308 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,243 sy $ 18.99 $ 365,418 B13 lConcrete Median 10,824 sf $ 53.96 $ 584,063 D4 ISidewalk 7,216 sy $ 50.00 $ 360,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,828,526 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 73,141 V Prep ROW 4% $ 73,141 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 54,856 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 91,426 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 639,984 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 91,426 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 91,426 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 36,571 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 109,712 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,188,542 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,017,068 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 603,414 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,621,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,621,000 Bonds: 5% $ 181,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 543,150 Mobilization 10% $ 362,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 543,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,250,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lipes Blvd to S Staples St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,115 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,365 cy $ 16.91 $ 242,904 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,691 sy $ 11.70 $ 323,981 B8 Underseal 27,691 sy $ 6.46 $ 178,882 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,691 sy $ 18.99 $ 525,846 B13 lConcrete Median 15,576 sf $ 53.96 $ 840,481 D4 ISidewalk 10,384 sy $ 50.00 $ 519,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,631,293 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 105,252 V Prep ROW 4% $ 105,252 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 78,939 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 131,565 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 920,953 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 131,565 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 131,565 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 52,626 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 157,878 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,110,341 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,741,634 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 948,327 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,690,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,690,000 Bonds: 5% $ 284,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 853,500 Mobilization 10% $ 569,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 853,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,251,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Staples St to Loire Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,376 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,956 cy $ 16.91 $ 185,266 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 21,120 sy $ 11.70 $ 247,104 B8 JUnderseal 21,120 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 136,435 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 21,120 sy $ 18.99 $ 401,069 B13 lConcrete Median 11,880 sf $ 53.96 $ 641,045 D4 ISidewalk 7,920 sy $ 50.00 $ 396,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,006,919 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 80,277 V Prep ROW 4% $ 80,277 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 60,208 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 100,346 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 702,422 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,346 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 100,346 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 40,138 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 120,415 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,304,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,311,416 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 662,283 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,974,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,974,000 Bonds: 5% $ 198,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 596,100 Mobilization 10% $ 397,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 596,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,762,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Loire Blvd to Cimarron Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,904 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,391 cy $ 16.91 $ 226,436 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,813 sy $ 11.70 $ 302,016 B8 JUnderseal 25,813 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 166,754 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,813 sy $ 18.99 $ 490,195 B13 lConcrete Median 14,520 sf $ 53.96 $ 783,499 D4 ISidewalk 9,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 484,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,452,901 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,116 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,116 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 73,587 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 122,645 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 858,515 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 122,645 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,058 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 147,174 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,994,385 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,447,286 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 889,457 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,337,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,337,000 Bonds: 5% $ 266,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 800,550 Mobilization 10% $ 533,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 800,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,739,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Cimarron Blvd to 309'W of W Logan Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,608 cy $ 16.91 $ 247,021 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 28,160 sy $ 11.70 $ 329,472 B8 Underseal 28,160 sy $ 6.46 $ 181,914 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 28,160 sy $ 18.99 $ 534,758 B13 lConcrete Median 15,840 sf $ 53.96 $ 854,726 D4 ISidewalk 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,675,892 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 107,036 V Prep ROW 4% $ 107,036 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 80,277 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 133,795 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 936,562 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,795 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,795 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 53,518 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 160,554 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,139,330 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,815,221 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 963,044 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,779,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,779,000 Bonds: 5% $ 288,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 866,850 Mobilization 10% $ 577,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 866,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,380,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 309'W of Logan Dr to Rodd Field Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,059 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,495 cy $ 16.91 $ 160,564 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,304 sy $ 11.70 $ 214,157 B8 JUnderseal 18,304 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 118,244 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,304 sy $ 18.99 $ 347,593 B13 lConcrete Median 10,296 sf $ 53.96 $ 555,572 D4 ISidewalk 6,864 sy $ 50.00 $ 343,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,739,330 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 69,573 V Prep ROW 4% $ 69,573 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,180 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 86,966 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 608,765 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,966 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,966 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 34,787 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 104,360 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,130,564 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,869,894 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 573,979 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,4441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,444,000 Bonds: 5% $ 172,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 516,600 Mobilization 10% $ 344,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 516,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,994,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rodd Field Rd to Freds Folly Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,482 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,443 cy $ 16.91 $ 193,500 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,059 sy $ 11.70 $ 258,086 B8 JUnderseal 22,059 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 142,499 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,059 sy $ 18.99 $ 418,894 B13 lConcrete Median 12,408 sf $ 53.96 $ 669,536 D4 ISidewalk 8,272 sy $ 50.00 $ 413,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,096,115 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 83,845 V Prep ROW 4% $ 83,845 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 62,883 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 104,806 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 733,640 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 104,806 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 104,806 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 41,922 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 125,767 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,362,475 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,458,590 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 691,718 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,151,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,151,000 Bonds: 5% $ 207,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 622,650 Mobilization 10% $ 415,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 622,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,019,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Freds Folly Dr to 1274'E of Starry Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 4,066 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 18,747 cy $ 16.91 $ 317,011 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 36,139 sy $ 11.70 $ 422,822 B8 JUnderseal 36,139 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 233,456 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 36,139 sy $ 18.99 $ 686,273 B13 lConcrete Median 20,328 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,096,899 D4 ISidewalk 13,552 sy $ 50.00 $ 677,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,434,061 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 137,362 V Prep ROW 4% $ 137,362 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 103,022 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 171,703 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,201,921 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 171,703 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 171,703 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 68,681 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 206,044 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,632,140 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,066,201 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,213,240 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,280,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,280,000 Bonds: 5% $ 364,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,092,000 Mobilization 10% $ 728,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,092,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,556,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 13-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1274'E of Starry Rd to Cayo del Oso(Water Feature) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,901 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,765 cy $ 16.91 $ 148,213 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,896 sy $ 11.70 $ 197,683 B8 JUnderseal 16,896 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 109,148 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,896 sy $ 18.99 $ 320,855 B13 lConcrete Median 9,504 sf $ 53.96 $ 512,836 D4 ISidewalk 6,336 sy $ 50.00 $ 316,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,605,535 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 64,271— V Prep ROW 4% $ 64,221 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 48,166 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 80,277 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 561,937 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,277 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,277 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 32,111 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,332 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,043,598 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,649,133 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 529,827 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,179,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,179,000 Bonds: 5% $ 158,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 476,850 Mobilization 10% $ 317,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 476,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,610,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 13-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Oso Pkwy to 185'E of S Oso Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,725 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 17,176 cy $ 16.91 $ 290,453 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 33,111 sy $ 11.70 $ 387,400 B8 JUnderseal 33,111 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 213,898 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 33,111 sy $ 18.99 $ 628,780 B13 lConcrete Median 18,625 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,005,005 D4 ISidewalk 12,417 sy $ 50.00 $ 620,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,146,369 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 125,855 V Prep ROW 4% $ 125,855 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 94,391 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 157,318 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,101,229 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 157,318 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 157,318 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 62,927 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 188,782 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,445,140 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,591,509 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,118,302 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,710,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,710,000 Bonds: 5% $ 335,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,006,500 Mobilization 10% $ 671,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,006,500 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 9,730,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 13-W Project Number: 13-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Safety Steel Dr to Rodd Field Road roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,581 cy $ 16.91 $ 43,650 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,811 sy $ 13.78 $ 66,291 B8 IUnderseal I 4,811 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 31,077 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 5,045 sy $ 5.65 $ 28,506 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 345,524 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 13,821 V Prep ROW 4% $ 13,821 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,366 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 17,276 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 120,934 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,276 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,276 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,910 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 20,731 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 224,591 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 570,115 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 114,023 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 685,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 685,000 Bonds: 5% $ 34,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 102,750 Mobilization 10% $ 68,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 102,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 993,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- '"—k� Description: Project No. 13-AB Project Number: 13-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: PR E-W Segment to Oso Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,218 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,226 cy $ 16.91 $ 172,915 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,712 sy $ 11.70 $ 230,630 B8 IUnderseal I 19,712 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 127,340 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,712 sy $ 18.99 $ 374,331 B13 lConcrete Median 11,088 sf $ 53.96 $ 598,308 D4 ISidewalk I 7,392 sy $ 50.00 $ 369,600 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,873,124 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 74,925 V Prep ROW 4% $ 74,925 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 56,194 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 93,656 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 655,593 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,656 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 93,656 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 37,462 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 112,387 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,217,531 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,090,655 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 618,131 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,709,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,709,000 Bonds: 5% $ 185,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 556,350 Mobilization 10% $ 370,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 556,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,378,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project No. 13-AC Project Number: 13-AC This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Oso Pkwy to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,482 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 11,443 cy $ 16.91 $ 193,500 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,059 sy $ 11.70 $ 258,086 B8 IUnderseal I 22,059 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 142,499 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,059 sy $ 18.99 $ 418,894 B13 lConcrete Median 12,408 sf $ 53.96 $ 669,536 D4 ISidewalk I 8,272 sy $ 50.00 $ 413,600 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,096,115 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 83,845 V Prep ROW 4% $ 83,845 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 62,883 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 104,806 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 733,640 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 104,806 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 104,806 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 41,922 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 125,767 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,362,475 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,458,590 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 691,718 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,151,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,151,000 Bonds: 5% $ 207,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 622,650 Mobilization 10% $ 415,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 622,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,019,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Info-rmatio'n"""""" Description: Project No. 13-AF Project Number: 13-AF This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Yorktown Blvd to Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 10,560 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 25,813 cy $ 16.91 $ 436,503 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 48,107 sy $ 11.70 $ 562,848 B8 IUnderseal I 48,107 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 310,769 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 48,107 sy $ 18.99 $ 913,546 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 35,200 sy $ 50.00 $ 1,760,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,983,666 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 159,347 V Prep ROW 4% $ 159,347 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 119,510 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 199,183 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,394,283 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 199,183 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 199,183 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 79,673 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 239,020 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 1,600,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,189,383 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,173,049 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,634,610 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 9,808,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 9,808,000 Bonds: 5% $ 490,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,471,200 Mobilization 10% $ 980,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 1,471,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 14,222,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • », Description: Project Number: 13-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Rodd Field Rd(PR Segment)to Cimarron Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 6,072 Service Area(s): Southside 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 14,843 cy $ 16.91 $ 250,989 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 27,661 sy $ 11.70 $ 323,638 B8 IUnderseal I 27,661 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 178,692 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 27,661 sy $ 18.99 $ 525,289 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 20,240 sy $ 50.00 $ 1,012,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,290,608 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 91,624 V Prep ROW 4% $ 91,624 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 68,718 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 114,530 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 801,713 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 114,530 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 114,530 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 45,812 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 137,436 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,288,895 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,579,503 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 915,901 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,496,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,496,000 Bonds: 5% $ 274,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 824,400 Mobilization 10% $ 549,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 824,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,969,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: SH 358 to 1540'S of SH 358 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,542 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,626 cy $ 16.91 $ 78,226 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,738 sy $ 11.70 $ 102,235 B8 JUnderseal 8,738 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 56,447 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,738 sy $ 18.99 $ 165,935 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,140 sy $ 50.00 $ 257,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 659,842 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,394 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,394 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,795 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 32,992 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 230,945 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,992 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,992 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,197 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,591 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 428,898 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,088,740 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 217,748 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,307,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,307,000 Bonds: 5% $ 65,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 196,050 Mobilization 10% $ 130,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 196,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,895,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1540'S of SH 358 to Holly Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,629 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,887 cy $ 16.91 $ 133,369 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,898 sy $ 11.70 $ 174,303 B8 Underseal 14,898 sy $ 6.46 $ 96,239 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,898 sy $ 18.99 $ 282,907 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,763 sy $ 50.00 $ 438,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,124,984 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 44,999 V Prep ROW 4% $ 44,999 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 33,750 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 56,249 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 393,744 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,249 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,249 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,500 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 67,499 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 731,240 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,856,224 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 371,245 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,228,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,228,000 Bonds: 5% $ 111,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 334,200 Mobilization 10% $ 222,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 334,200 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,231,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rodd Field Rd to Lexington Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,645 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,992 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,968 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,103 sy $ 11.70 $ 223,503 B8 JUnderseal 19,103 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 123,404 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,103 sy $ 18.99 $ 362,762 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,817 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,319,470 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,779 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,779 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,584 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,974 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 461,815 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,974 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,974 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,389 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,168 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,257,656 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,577,126 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 515,425 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,093,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,093,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 463,950 Mobilization 10% $ 309,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 463,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,485,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lexington Rd to Ennis Joslin Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,501 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,921 cy $ 16.91 $ 117,039 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 13,342 sy $ 11.70 $ 156,104 B8 JUnderseal 13,342 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 86,191 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 13,342 sy $ 18.99 $ 253,369 B13 lConcrete Median 7,505 sf $ 53.96 $ 404,970 D4 ISidewalk 5,003 sy $ 50.00 $ 250,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,267,839 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 50,714 V Prep ROW 4% $ 50,714 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 38,035 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 63,392 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 443,744 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 63,392 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 63,392 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,357 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 76,070 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 824,095 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,091,934 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 418,387 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,511,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,511,000 Bonds: 5% $ 125,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 376,650 Mobilization 10% $ 251,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 376,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,641,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ennis Joslin Rd to Paul Jones Ave roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,496 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,043 cy $ 16.91 $ 136,001 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,253 sy $ 11.70 $ 178,464 B8 JUnderseal 15,253 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 98,537 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,253 sy $ 18.99 $ 289,661 B13 lConcrete Median 9,984 sf $ 53.96 $ 538,737 D4 ISidewalk 8,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 416,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,657,399 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 66,296 V Prep ROW 4% $ 66,296 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 49,722 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 82,870 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 580,090 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 82,870 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 82,870 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 33,148 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 99,444 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,077,310 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,734,709 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 546,942 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,282,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,282,000 Bonds: 5% $ 164,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 492,300 Mobilization 10% $ 328,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 492,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,759,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rodd Field Rd to Victoria Park Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,331 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,733 cy $ 16.91 $ 181,499 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,356 sy $ 11.70 $ 238,167 B8 JUnderseal 20,356 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 131,500 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,356 sy $ 18.99 $ 386,563 B13 lConcrete Median 13,324 sf $ 53.96 $ 718,963 D4 ISidewalk 11,103 sy $ 50.00 $ 555,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,211,858 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 88,474 V Prep ROW 4% $ 88,474 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,356 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 110,593 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 774,150 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 110,593 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 110,593 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,237 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 132,711 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,837,708 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,049,566 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 809,913 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,860,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,860,000 Bonds: 5% $ 243,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 729,000 Mobilization 10% $ 486,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 729,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,047,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Victoria Park Drto Ennis Joslin Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 803 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,587 cy $ 16.91 $ 43,754 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,907 sy $ 11.70 $ 57,415 B8 JUnderseal 4,907 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,701 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,907 sy $ 18.99 $ 93,188 B13 lConcrete Median 3,212 sf $ 53.96 $ 173,320 D4 ISidewalk 2,677 sy $ 50.00 $ 133,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 533,210 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 21,328 V Prep ROW 4% $ 21,328 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,996 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 26,660 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 186,623 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,660 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 26,660 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,664 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,993 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 346,586 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 879,796 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 175,959 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,056,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,056,000 Bonds: 5% $ 52,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 158,400 Mobilization 10% $ 105,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 158,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,531,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Cimarron Blvd to Bronx Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,084 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,252 cy $ 16.91 $ 105,721 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,809 sy $ 11.70 $ 138,169 B8 Underseal 11,809 sy $ 6.46 $ 76,288 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,809 sy $ 18.99 $ 224,259 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,947 sy $ 50.00 $ 347,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 891,771 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,671 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,671 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,753 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,589 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 312,120 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,589 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,589 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,835 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,506 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 579,651 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,471,423 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 294,285 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,766,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,766,000 Bonds: 5% $ 88,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 264,900 Mobilization 10% $ 176,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 264,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,561,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Bronx Dr to Airline Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,644 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,932 cy $ 16.91 $ 83,400 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,316 sy $ 11.70 $ 108,997 B8 Underseal 9,316 sy $ 6.46 $ 60,181 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,316 sy $ 18.99 $ 176,911 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,480 sy $ 50.00 $ 274,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 703,490 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 28,140 V Prep ROW 4% $ 28,140 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 21,105 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 35,174 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 246,221 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,174 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 35,174 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 14,070 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 42,209 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 457,268 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,160,758 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 232,152 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,393,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,393,000 Bonds: 5% $ 69,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 208,950 Mobilization 10% $ 139,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 208,950 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,020,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Rodd Field Rd to Freds Folly Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,496 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,509 cy $ 16.91 $ 194,623 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,187 sy $ 11.70 $ 259,584 B8 JUnderseal 22,187 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 143,326 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,187 sy $ 18.99 $ 421,325 B13 lConcrete Median 12,480 sf $ 53.96 $ 673,421 D4 ISidewalk 8,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 416,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,108,278 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 84,331 V Prep ROW 4% $ 84,331 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 63,248 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 105,414 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 737,897 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,414 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 105,414 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,166 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 126,497 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,370,381 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,478,659 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 695,732 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,175,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,175,000 Bonds: 5% $ 208,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 626,250 Mobilization 10% $ 417,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 626,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 6,054,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 14-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Freds Folly Dr to 1274'E of Starry Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 4,070 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 18,767 cy $ 16.91 $ 317,354 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 36,178 sy $ 11.70 $ 423,280 B8 Underseal 36,178 sy $ 6.46 $ 233,708 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 36,178 sy $ 18.99 $ 687,016 B13 lConcrete Median 20,350 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,098,086 D4 ISidewalk 13,567 sy $ 50.00 $ 678,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,437,778 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 137,511 V Prep ROW 4% $ 137,511 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 103,133 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 171,889 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,203,222 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 171,889 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 171,889 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 68,756 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 206,267 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,634,555 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,072,333 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,214,467 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,287,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,287,000 Bonds: 5% $ 364,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,093,050 Mobilization 10% $ 728,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,093,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,566,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1274'E of Starry Rd to Cayo del Oso(Water Feature) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,896 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,743 cy $ 16.91 $ 147,838 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,853 sy $ 11.70 $ 197,184 B8 JUnderseal 16,853 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 108,873 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,853 sy $ 18.99 $ 320,045 B13 lConcrete Median 9,480 sf $ 53.96 $ 511,541 D4 ISidewalk 6,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 316,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,601,481 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 64,059 V Prep ROW 4% $ 64,059 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 48,044 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 80,074 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 560,518 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,074 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,074 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 32,030 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,089 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,040,962 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,642,443 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 528,489 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,171,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,171,000 Bonds: 5% $ 158,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 475,650 Mobilization 10% $ 317,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 475,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,598,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: 11 Project Number: 14-Q This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: SH 358 to Williams Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 1,455 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,709 cy $ 16.91 $ 113,452 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,933 sy $ 11.70 $ 151,320 B8 JUnderseal 12,933 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 83,549 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,933 sy $ 18.99 $ 245,604 B13 lConcrete Median 7,275 sf $ 53.96 $ 392,559 D4 ISidewalk 4,850 sy $ 50.00 $ 242,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,228,984 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 49,159 V Prep ROW 4% $ 49,159 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,870 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 61,449 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 430,145 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,449 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 61,449 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,580 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 73,739 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,840 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,027,824 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 405,565 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,4341 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,434,000 Bonds: 5% $ 121,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 365,100 Mobilization 10% $ 243,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 365,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,529,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-R This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Williams Dr to Holly Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,928 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,501 cy $ 16.91 $ 228,308 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 26,027 sy $ 11.70 $ 304,512 B8 JUnderseal 26,027 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 168,132 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 26,027 sy $ 18.99 $ 494,246 B13 lConcrete Median 14,640 sf $ 53.96 $ 789,974 D4 ISidewalk 9,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 488,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,473,173 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 98,927 V Prep ROW 4% $ 98,927 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 74,195 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 123,659 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 865,610 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 123,659 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 123,659 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 49,463 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 148,390 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,007,562 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,480,735 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 896,147 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,377,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,377,000 Bonds: 5% $ 268,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 806,550 Mobilization 10% $ 537,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 806,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,797,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-S This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Holly Rd to Cimarron Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,080 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,591 cy $ 16.91 $ 162,186 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,489 sy $ 11.70 $ 216,320 B8 JUnderseal 18,489 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 119,438 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,489 sy $ 18.99 $ 351,104 B13 lConcrete Median 10,400 sf $ 53.96 $ 561,184 D4 ISidewalk 6,933 sy $ 50.00 $ 346,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,756,899 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,276 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,276 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,707 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,845 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 614,915 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,845 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,845 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,138 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,414 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,141,984 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,898,883 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 579,777 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,479,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,479,000 Bonds: 5% $ 173,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 521,850 Mobilization 10% $ 347,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 521,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,045,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-T This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Cimarron Blvd to Woolridge Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 919 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,238 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,658 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,169 sy $ 11.70 $ 95,576 B8 JUnderseal 8,169 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 52,771 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,169 sy $ 18.99 $ 155,127 B13 lConcrete Median 4,595 sf $ 53.96 $ 247,946 D4 ISidewalk 3,063 sy $ 50.00 $ 153,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 776,245 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 31,050 V Prep ROW 4% $ 31,050 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 23,287 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 38,812 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 271,686 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,812 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,812 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,525 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 46,575 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 504,559 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,280,804 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 256,161 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,537,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,537,000 Bonds: 5% $ 76,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 230,550 Mobilization 10% $ 153,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 230,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,229,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-Z This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Cimarron Blvd to Airline Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,252 cy $ 16.91 $ 156,447 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 17,835 sy $ 11.70 $ 208,666 B8 JUnderseal 17,835 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 115,212 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 17,835 sy $ 18.99 $ 338,680 B13 lConcrete Median 10,032 sf $ 53.96 $ 541,327 D4 ISidewalk 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,694,731 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 67,789 V Prep ROW 4% $ 67,789 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 50,842 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 84,737 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 593,156 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 84,737 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 84,737 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 33,895 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 101,684 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,101,575 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,796,307 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 559,261 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,356,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,356,000 Bonds: 5% $ 167,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 503,400 Mobilization 10% $ 335,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 503,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,866,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-AA This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Airline Rd to Rodd Field Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,326 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 15,338 cy $ 16.91 $ 259,372 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 29,568 sy $ 11.70 $ 345,946 B8 JUnderseal 29,568 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 191,009 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 29,568 sy $ 18.99 $ 561,496 B13 lConcrete Median 16,632 sf $ 53.96 $ 897,463 D4 ISidewalk 11,088 sy $ 50.00 $ 554,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,809,686 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 112,387 V Prep ROW 4% $ 112,387 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 84,291 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 140,484 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 983,390 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 140,484 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 140,484 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 56,194 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 168,581 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,226,296 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,035,982 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,007,196 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,0441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,044,000 Bonds: 5% $ 302,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 906,600 Mobilization 10% $ 604,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 906,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,764,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- C Project Number: 14-AB This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Cimarron Blvd to 309'W of Bichon Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 14,608 cy $ 16.91 $ 247,021 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 28,160 sy $ 11.70 $ 329,472 B8 Underseal 28,160 sy $ 6.46 $ 181,914 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 28,160 sy $ 18.99 $ 534,758 B13 lConcrete Median 15,840 sf $ 53.96 $ 854,726 D4 ISidewalk 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,675,892 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 107,036 V Prep ROW 4% $ 107,036 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 80,277 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 133,795 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 936,562 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,795 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,795 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 53,518 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 160,554 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,139,330 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,815,221 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 963,044 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,779,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,779,000 Bonds: 5% $ 288,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 866,850 Mobilization 10% $ 577,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 866,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 8,380,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-AC This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 309'W of W Logan Drto Rodd Field Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 2,059 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,495 cy $ 16.91 $ 160,564 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,304 sy $ 11.70 $ 214,157 B8 JUnderseal 18,304 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 118,244 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,304 sy $ 18.99 $ 347,593 B13 lConcrete Median 10,296 sf $ 53.96 $ 555,572 D4 ISidewalk 6,864 sy $ 50.00 $ 343,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,739,330 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 69,573 V Prep ROW 4% $ 69,573 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,180 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 86,966 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 608,765 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,966 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 86,966 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 34,787 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 104,360 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,130,564 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,869,894 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 573,979 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,4441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,444,000 Bonds: 5% $ 172,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 516,600 Mobilization 10% $ 344,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 516,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,994,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 14-AD This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Rodd Field Dr to Lexington Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,693 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,078 cy $ 16.91 $ 136,606 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,259 sy $ 11.70 $ 178,533 B8 IUnderseal I 15,259 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 98,574 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,259 sy $ 18.99 $ 289,772 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,976 sy $ 50.00 $ 448,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,152,285 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,091 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,091 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 34,569 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 57,614 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 403,300 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,614 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,614 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,046 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 69,137 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,148,985 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,301,270 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 460,254 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,762,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,762,000 Bonds: 5% $ 138,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 414,300 Mobilization 10% $ 276,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 414,300 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,005,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 1 Project Number: 14-AE This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Lexington Rd to Ennis Joslin Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,478 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,435 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,999 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,378 sy $ 11.70 $ 98,018 B8 IUnderseal I 8,378 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 54,119 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,378 sy $ 18.99 $ 159,091 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,928 sy $ 50.00 $ 246,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 632,627 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 25,305 V Prep ROW 4% $ 25,305 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,979 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 31,631 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 221,419 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,631 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,631 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,653 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,958 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 411,208 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,043,835 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 208,767 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,253,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,253,000 Bonds: 5% $ 62,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 187,950 Mobilization 10% $ 125,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 187,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,817,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 14-AG Project Number: 14-AG This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Country Road 26A to Country Road 26 roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 2,746 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,711 cy $ 16.91 $ 113,491 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,508 sy $ 11.70 $ 146,340 B8 IUnderseal I 12,508 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 80,800 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,508 sy $ 18.99 $ 237,522 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,152 sy $ 50.00 $ 457,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,035,753 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 41,430 V Prep ROW 4% $ 41,430 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,073 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 51,788 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 362,514 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,788 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,788 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,715 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 62,145 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,073,240 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,108,993 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 421,799 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,531,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,531,000 Bonds: 5% $ 126,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 379,650 Mobilization 10% $ 253,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 379,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,670,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 14-AH Project Number: 14-AH This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Country Road 26 to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 3,485 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,518 cy $ 16.91 $ 144,046 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,875 sy $ 11.70 $ 185,740 B8 IUnderseal I 15,875 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 102,554 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,875 sy $ 18.99 $ 301,470 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 11,616 sy $ 50.00 $ 580,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,314,610 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,584 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,584 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,438 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,730 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 460,113 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,730 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,730 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,292 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 78,877 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,254,496 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,569,106 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 513,821 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 462,450 Mobilization 10% $ 308,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 462,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,470,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 14-Al Project Number: 14-AI This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Las Bahias Dr to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,478 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,614 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,110 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,735 sy $ 13.78 $ 92,807 B8 IUnderseal I 6,735 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 43,508 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,063 sy $ 5.65 $ 39,909 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,928 sy $ 50.00 $ 246,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 483,734 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 19,349 V Prep ROW 4% $ 19,349 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,512 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 24,187 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 169,307 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,187 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,187 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,675 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,024 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 314,427 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,161 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 159,632 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 958,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 958,000 Bonds: 5% $ 47,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 143,700 Mobilization 10% $ 95,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 143,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,389,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 14-AJ Project Number: 14-AJ This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 330'E of Pennine Way to Oso Pakway(Proposed Sectii roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 950 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,323 cy $ 16.91 $ 39,285 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,330 sy $ 13.78 $ 59,662 B8 IUnderseal I 4,330 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 27,969 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 4,541 sy $ 5.65 $ 25,656 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,168 sy $ 50.00 $ 158,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 310,972 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,439 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,439 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,329 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 15,549 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 108,840 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,549 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 15,549 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,219 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 18,658 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 202,132 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 513,104 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 102,621 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 616,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 616,000 Bonds: 5% $ 30,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 92,400 Mobilization 10% $ 61,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 92,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 893,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 14-AL Project Number: 14-AL This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Country Rd 7b Cirto Oso Pakrway(Proposed Section) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,795 Service Area(s): Southside 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,388 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,206 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,178 sy $ 13.78 $ 112,695 B8 IUnderseal I 8,178 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 52,831 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,577 sy $ 5.65 $ 48,460 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,984 sy $ 50.00 $ 299,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 587,391 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,496 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,496 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,622 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,370 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 205,587 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,370 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,748 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,243 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 381,804 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 969,196 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 193,839 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,164,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,164,000 Bonds: 5% $ 58,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 174,600 Mobilization 10% $ 116,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 174,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,688,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: CR 20Ato 315'S of Mars Hill Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,920 cy $ 16.91 $ 133,927 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,960 sy $ 11.70 $ 175,032 B8 JUnderseal 14,960 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 96,642 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,960 sy $ 18.99 $ 284,090 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,129,691 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 45,188 V Prep ROW 4% $ 45,188 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 33,891 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 56,485 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 395,392 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,485 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,485 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,594 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 67,781 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,134,299 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,263,990 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 452,798 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,717,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,717,000 Bonds: 5% $ 135,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 407,550 Mobilization 10% $ 271,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 407,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,940,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 315'S of Mars Hill Dr to S Staples St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,920 cy $ 16.91 $ 133,927 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,960 sy $ 11.70 $ 175,032 B8 JUnderseal 14,960 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 96,642 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,960 sy $ 18.99 $ 284,090 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,129,691 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 45,188 V Prep ROW 4% $ 45,188 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 33,891 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 56,485 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 395,392 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,485 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,485 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 22,594 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 67,781 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,134,299 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,263,990 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 452,798 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,717,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,717,000 Bonds: 5% $ 135,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 407,550 Mobilization 10% $ 271,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 407,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,940,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Staples St to Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Segment)to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy 1 $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy 1 $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-U This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: CR 43 to Lady Claudia St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,006 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,019 cy $ 16.91 $ 101,785 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,370 sy $ 11.70 $ 133,024 B8 JUnderseal 11,370 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 73,448 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,370 sy $ 18.99 $ 215,909 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 6,688 sy $ 50.00 $ 334,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 858,565 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,343 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,343 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,757 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 42,928 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 300,498 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,928 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,928 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,171 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,514 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 558,067 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,416,633 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 283,327 Construction Cost TOT $ 1,700,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,700,000 Bonds: 5% $ 85,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 255,000 Mobilization 10% $ 170,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 255,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,465,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-V This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lady Claudia St to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,960 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,880 cy $ 16.91 $ 200,891 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 22,440 sy $ 11.70 $ 262,548 B8 JUnderseal 22,440 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 144,962 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 22,440 sy $ 18.99 $ 426,136 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,200 sy $ 50.00 $ 660,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,694,537 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 67,781 V Prep ROW 4% $ 67,781 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 50,836 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 84,727 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 593,088 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 84,727 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 84,727 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 33,891 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 101,672 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,501,449 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,195,986 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 639,197 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,836,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,836,000 Bonds: 5% $ 191,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 575,400 Mobilization 10% $ 383,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 575,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,562,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-W This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Lady Alexa Dr to N-S Segment 2 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,746 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,237 cy $ 16.91 $ 139,284 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,558 sy $ 11.70 $ 182,033 B8 JUnderseal 15,558 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 100,507 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,558 sy $ 18.99 $ 295,454 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 9,152 sy $ 50.00 $ 457,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,174,879 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,995 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,995 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,246 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 58,744 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 411,208 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,744 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,744 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,498 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 70,493 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,163,671 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,338,550 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 467,710 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,807,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,807,000 Bonds: 5% $ 140,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 421,050 Mobilization 10% $ 280,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 421,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,070,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-X This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: N-S Segment 2 to CR 33 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,056 Service Area(s): London Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,168 cy $ 16.91 $ 53,571 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 5,984 sy $ 11.70 $ 70,013 B8 Underseal 5,984 sy $ 6.46 $ 38,657 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 5,984 sy $ 18.99 $ 113,636 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,520 sy $ 50.00 $ 176,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 451,876 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 18,075 V Prep ROW 4% $ 18,075 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 13,556 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 22,594 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 158,157 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,594 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 22,594 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,038 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 27,113 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 293,720 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 745,596 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 149,119 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 895,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 895,000 Bonds: 5% $ 44,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 134,250 Mobilization 10% $ 89,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 134,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,298,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 15-A Project Number: 15-A This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Deer Park Rd to 20A(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 3,168 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,744 cy $ 16.91 $ 130,951 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,432 sy $ 11.70 $ 168,854 B8 IUnderseal I 14,432 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 93,231 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,432 sy $ 18.99 $ 274,064 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,560 sy $ 50.00 $ 528,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,195,100 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 47,804 V Prep ROW 4% $ 47,804 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,853 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 59,755 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 418,285 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,755 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,755 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,902 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 71,706 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,176,815 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,371,915 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 474,383 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,847,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,847,000 Bonds: 5% $ 142,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 427,050 Mobilization 10% $ 284,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 427,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,128,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-B This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 20A(PR Segment)to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,872 cy $ 16.91 $ 65,476 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,216 sy $ 11.70 $ 84,427 B8 IUnderseal I 7,216 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 46,615 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,216 sy $ 18.99 $ 137,032 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 597,550 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,902 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,902 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,926 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,877 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 209,142 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,877 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,877 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,951 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,853 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 388,407 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 985,957 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 197,191 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,184,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,184,000 Bonds: 5% $ 59,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 177,600 Mobilization 10% $ 118,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 177,600 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,717,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-C This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: City Limits to S Oso Pkwy(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,960 cy $ 16.91 $ 66,964 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,480 sy $ 11.70 $ 87,516 B8 IUnderseal I 7,480 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 48,321 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,480 sy $ 18.99 $ 142,045 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 564,846 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,594 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,594 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 16,945 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,242 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 197,696 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,242 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,242 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,297 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 33,891 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 367,150 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 931,995 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 186,399 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,119,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,119,000 Bonds: 5% $ 55,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 167,850 Mobilization 10% $ 111,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 167,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,623,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 15-H Project Number: 15-H This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Kitty Hawk Dr(PR Segment)to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 3,326 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,979 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,748 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,850 sy $ 11.70 $ 220,540 B8 IUnderseal I 18,850 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 121,768 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,850 sy $ 18.99 $ 357,954 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 11,088 sy $ 50.00 $ 554,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,423,411 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 56,936 V Prep ROW 4% $ 56,936 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 42,702 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 71,171 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 498,194 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,171 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,171 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,468 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 85,405 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,325,217 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,748,628 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 549,726 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,299,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,299,000 Bonds: 5% $ 164,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 494,850 Mobilization 10% $ 329,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 494,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,784,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 15-1 Project Number: 15-1 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: CR 41 to N-S Segment 1 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,534 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,195 cy $ 16.91 $ 104,761 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 11,546 sy $ 13.78 $ 159,098 B8 IUnderseal I 11,546 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 74,585 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,109 sy $ 5.65 $ 68,415 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,448 sy $ 50.00 $ 422,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 829,258 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 33,170 V Prep ROW 4% $ 33,170 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,878 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 41,463 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 290,240 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,463 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,463 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,585 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 49,756 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 539,018 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,368,277 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 273,655 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,642,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,642,000 Bonds: 5% $ 82,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 246,300 Mobilization 10% $ 164,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 246,300 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,381,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 15-J Project Number: 15-J This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N-S Segment 1 to S Oso Pkwy roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,376 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,808 cy $ 16.91 $ 98,213 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,824 sy $ 13.78 $ 149,155 B8 IUnderseal I 10,824 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 69,923 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 11,352 sy $ 5.65 $ 64,139 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,920 sy $ 50.00 $ 396,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 777,430 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 31,097 V Prep ROW 4% $ 31,097 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 23,323 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 38,871 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 272,100 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,871 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 38,871 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,549 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 46,646 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 505,329 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,282,759 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 256,552 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,540,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,540,000 Bonds: 5% $ 77,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 231,000 Mobilization 10% $ 154,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 231,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,233,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-K This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: CR 41 to N-S Segment 1 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 1,214 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,643 cy $ 16.91 $ 61,607 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 6,882 sy $ 11.70 $ 80,515 B8 IUnderseal I 6,882 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 44,455 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 6,882 sy $ 18.99 $ 130,682 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,048 sy $ 50.00 $ 202,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 519,658 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 20,786 V Prep ROW 4% $ 20,786 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 15,590 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 25,983 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 181,880 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,983 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 25,983 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 10,393 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 31,179 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 337,778 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 857,436 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 171,487 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,029,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,029,000 Bonds: 5% $ 51,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 154,350 Mobilization 10% $ 102,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 154,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,492,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 15-L Project Number: 15-L This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: N-S Segment 1 to Kitty Hawk Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 634 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,549 cy $ 16.91 $ 26,190 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,886 sy $ 13.78 $ 39,775 B8 IUnderseal I 2,886 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 18,646 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,027 sy $ 5.65 $ 17,104 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,112 sy $ 50.00 $ 105,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 207,315 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 8,293 V Prep ROW 4% $ 8,293 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 6,219 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 10,366 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 72,560 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,366 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,366 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,146 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 12,439 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 134,755 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 342,069 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 68,414 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 411,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 411,000 Bonds: 5% $ 20,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 61,650 Mobilization 10% $ 41,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 61,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 596,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 15-M This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: City Limits to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Parkway Collector(131) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,035 cy $ 16.91 $ 152,776 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,837 sy $ 11.70 $ 196,997 B8 IUnderseal I 16,837 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 108,769 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,837 sy $ 18.99 $ 319,741 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,394,283 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 55,771 V Prep ROW 4% $ 55,771 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 41,828 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 69,714 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 487,999 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,714 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 69,714 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,886 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 83,657 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,306,284 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,700,567 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 540,113 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,241,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,241,000 Bonds: 5% $ 162,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 486,150 Mobilization 10% $ 324,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 486,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,699,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'ki, �fi. Description: Project No. 15-S Project Number: 15-S This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Lady Alexa Dr to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Primary Collector(0) Length(If): 2,746 Service Area(s): London Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,237 cy $ 16.91 $ 139,284 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 15,558 sy $ 11.70 $ 182,033 B8 IUnderseal I 15,558 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 100,507 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 15,558 sy $ 18.99 $ 295,454 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,152 sy $ 50.00 $ 457,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,174,879 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,995 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,995 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 35,246 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 58,744 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 411,208 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,744 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,744 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,498 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 70,493 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,163,671 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,338,550 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 467,710 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,807,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,807,000 Bonds: 5% $ 140,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 421,050 Mobilization 10% $ 280,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 421,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,070,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Roadway Limits to Webb St roadway. Costing Class: Primary Arterial(A3) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 17,043 cy $ 16.91 $ 288,191 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 32,853 sy $ 11.70 $ 384,384 B8 Underseal 32,853 sy $ 6.46 $ 212,233 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 32,853 sy $ 18.99 $ 623,885 B13 lConcrete Median 18,480 sf $ 53.96 $ 997,181 D4 ISidewalk 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,121,874 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 124,875 V Prep ROW 4% $ 124,875 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 93,656 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 156,094 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,092,656 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,094 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,094 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 62,437 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 187,312 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,429,218 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,551,091 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 1,110,218 Construction Cost TOT $ 6,662,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,662,000 Bonds: 5% $ 333,100 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 999,300 Mobilization 10% $ 666,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 999,300 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 9,660,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Webb St to Claride St roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 370 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,191 cy $ 16.91 $ 20,139 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 2,259 sy $ 11.70 $ 26,426 B8 JUnderseal 2,259 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 14,591 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 2,259 sy $ 18.99 $ 42,892 B13 lConcrete Median 1,478 sf $ 53.96 $ 79,774 D4 ISidewalk 1,232 sy $ 50.00 $ 61,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 245,423 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 9,817 V Prep ROW 4% $ 9,817 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,363 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 12,271 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 85,898 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,271 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,271 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,908 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 14,725 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 159,525 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 404,947 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 80,989 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 486,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 486,000 Bonds: 5% $ 24,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 72,900 Mobilization 10% $ 48,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 72,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 705,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Claride St to John F Kennedy Memorial Causeway roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,104 cy $ 16.91 $ 86,309 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,680 sy $ 11.70 $ 113,256 B8 Underseal 9,680 sy $ 6.46 $ 62,533 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,680 sy $ 18.99 $ 183,823 B13 lConcrete Median 6,336 sf $ 53.96 $ 341,891 D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,051,811 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 42,072 V Prep ROW 4% $ 42,072 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 31,554 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 52,591 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 368,134 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,591 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 21,036 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,109 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 683,677 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,735,488 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,098 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,083,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,083,000 Bonds: 5% $ 104,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 312,450 Mobilization 10% $ 208,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 312,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,020,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: John F Kennedy Memorial Causeway to Compton Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,214 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,913 cy $ 16.91 $ 66,170 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,421 sy $ 11.70 $ 86,830 B8 JUnderseal 7,421 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 47,942 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,421 sy $ 18.99 $ 140,931 B13 lConcrete Median 4,858 sf $ 53.96 $ 262,116 D4 ISidewalk 4,048 sy $ 50.00 $ 202,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 806,389 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 32,256 V Prep ROW 4% $ 32,256 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,192 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 40,319 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 282,236 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,319 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,319 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,128 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 48,383 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 524,153 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,330,541 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 266,108 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,597,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,597,000 Bonds: 5% $ 79,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 239,550 Mobilization 10% $ 159,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 239,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,316,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Compton Rd to Graham Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,373 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,423 cy $ 16.91 $ 74,801 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,389 sy $ 11.70 $ 98,155 B8 JUnderseal 8,389 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 54,195 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,389 sy $ 18.99 $ 159,313 B13 lConcrete Median 5,491 sf $ 53.96 $ 296,305 D4 ISidewalk 4,576 sy $ 50.00 $ 228,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 911,570 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 36,463 V Prep ROW 4% $ 36,463 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,347 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 45,578 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 319,049 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,578 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,578 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,231 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 54,694 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 592,520 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,504,090 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 300,818 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,805,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,805,000 Bonds: 5% $ 90,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 270,750 Mobilization 10% $ 180,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 270,750 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,617,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Graham Rd to Don Patricio Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,507 cy 1 $ 16.91 $ 143,848 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,133 sy 1 $ 11.70 $ 188,760 B8 JUnderseal 16,133 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,221 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,133 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,372 B13 lConcrete Median 10,560 sf $ 53.96 $ 569,818 D4 ISidewalk 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,753,019 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,171— V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,121 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,651 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 613,557 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,651 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,060 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,181 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,539,462 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,292,481 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 658,496 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,951,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,951,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 592,650 Mobilization 10% $ 395,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 592,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,729,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Don Patricio Rd to Stardust Ln(PR Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,253 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,924 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,067 sy $ 11.70 $ 94,380 B8 JUnderseal 8,067 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 52,111 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,067 sy $ 18.99 $ 153,186 B13 lConcrete Median 5,280 sf $ 53.96 $ 284,909 D4 ISidewalk 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 876,509 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,060 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,060 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,295 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,825 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 306,778 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,825 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,825 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,530 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,591 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 569,731 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,446,240 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 289,248 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,736,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,736,000 Bonds: 5% $ 86,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 260,400 Mobilization 10% $ 173,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 260,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,517,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-K This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Stardust Ln(PR Segment)to Purdue Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,253 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,924 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,067 sy $ 11.70 $ 94,380 B8 JUnderseal 8,067 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 52,111 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,067 sy $ 18.99 $ 153,186 B13 lConcrete Median 5,280 sf $ 53.96 $ 284,909 D4 ISidewalk 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 876,509 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,060 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,060 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,295 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,825 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 306,778 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,825 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,825 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,530 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,591 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 569,731 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,446,240 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 289,248 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,736,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,736,000 Bonds: 5% $ 86,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 260,400 Mobilization 10% $ 173,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 260,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,517,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 16-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Purdue Rd to Hustlin Hornet Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 317 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 1,021 cy $ 16.91 $ 17,262 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 1,936 sy $ 11.70 $ 22,651 B8 JUnderseal 1,936 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 12,507 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 1,936 sy $ 18.99 $ 36,765 B13 lConcrete Median 1,267 sf $ 53.96 $ 68,378 D4 ISidewalk 1,056 sy $ 50.00 $ 52,800 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 210,362 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 8,414 V Prep ROW 4% $ 8,414 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 6,311 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 10,518 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 73,627 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,518 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,518 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,207 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 12,622 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 136,735 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 347,098 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 69,420 Construction Cost TOT $ 417,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 417,000 Bonds: 5% $ 20,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 62,550 Mobilization 10% $ 41,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 62,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 605,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Information: Description: Project Number: 16-M This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Coastline to Flour Bluff Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 3,802 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 1 Description New Project Roadway Constru ion Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 12,250 cy $ 16.91 $ 207,141 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,232 sy $ 11.70 $ 271,814 B8 IUnderseal I 23,232 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 150,079 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,232 sy $ 18.99 $ 441,176 B13 lConcrete Median 15,206 sf $ 53.96 $ 820,537 D4 ISidewalk I 12,672 sy $ 50.00 $ 633,600 I I I I Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,524,347 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 100,974 V Prep ROW 4% $ 100,974 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 75,730 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 126,217 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 883,521 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 126,217 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 126,217 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 50,487 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 151,461 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,040,825 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,565,172 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 913,034 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,479,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,479,000 Bonds: 5% $ 273,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 821,850 Mobilization 10% $ 547,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 821,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,945,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Laguna Shores Rd to Waldron Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 4,635 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 11,587 cy $ 16.91 $ 195,945 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 21,630 sy $ 11.70 $ 253,071 B8 JUnderseal 21,630 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 139,730 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 21,630 sy $ 18.99 $ 410,754 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 15,450 sy $ 50.00 $ 772,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,771,999 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,880 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,880 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,160 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 88,600 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 620,200 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,600 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,600 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,440 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,320 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,551,799 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,323,799 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 664,760 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,989,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,989,000 Bonds: 5% $ 199,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 598,350 Mobilization 10% $ 398,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 598,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,784,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-B This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Waldron Rd to Flour Bluff Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 5,300 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 17,078 cy $ 16.91 $ 288,785 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 32,389 sy $ 11.70 $ 378,950 B8 JUnderseal 32,389 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 209,232 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 32,389 sy $ 18.99 $ 615,065 B13 lConcrete Median 21,200 sf $ 53.96 $ 1,143,952 D4 ISidewalk 17,667 sy $ 50.00 $ 883,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,519,318 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 140,773 V Prep ROW 4% $ 140,773 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 105,580 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 175,966 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,231,761 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 175,966 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 175,966 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 70,386 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 211,159 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,087,557 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,606,874 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,321,375 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,929,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,929,000 Bonds: 5% $ 396,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,189,350 Mobilization 10% $ 792,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,189,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 11,497,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Flour Bluff Dr to Scarlet Oak Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,662 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,578 cy $ 16.91 $ 145,046 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,268 sy $ 11.70 $ 190,333 B8 JUnderseal 16,268 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 105,090 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,268 sy $ 18.99 $ 308,925 B13 lConcrete Median 10,648 sf $ 53.96 $ 574,566 D4 ISidewalk 8,873 sy $ 50.00 $ 443,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,767,627 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,705 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,705 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,029 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 88,381 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 618,670 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,381 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 88,381 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,353 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,058 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,548,958 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,316,585 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 663,317 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,980,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,980,000 Bonds: 5% $ 199,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 597,000 Mobilization 10% $ 398,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 597,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,771,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Scarlet Oak Dr to Berlet Ln roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,339 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,315 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,959 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,183 sy $ 11.70 $ 95,739 B8 Underseal 8,183 sy $ 6.46 $ 52,861 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,183 sy $ 18.99 $ 155,391 B13 lConcrete Median 5,356 sf $ 53.96 $ 289,010 D4 ISidewalk 4,463 sy $ 50.00 $ 223,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 889,126 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,565 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,565 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,674 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,456 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 311,194 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,456 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,456 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,783 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,348 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 577,932 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,467,057 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 293,411 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,761,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,761,000 Bonds: 5% $ 88,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 264,150 Mobilization 10% $ 176,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 264,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,553,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Berlet Ln to Roscher Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,315 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,237 cy $ 16.91 $ 71,651 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 8,036 sy $ 11.70 $ 94,022 B8 JUnderseal 8,036 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 51,913 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 8,036 sy $ 18.99 $ 152,606 B13 lConcrete Median 5,260 sf $ 53.96 $ 283,830 D4 ISidewalk 4,383 sy $ 50.00 $ 219,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 873,189 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,928 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,928 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,196 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,659 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 305,616 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,659 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,659 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,464 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,391 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 567,573 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,440,762 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 288,152 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,729,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,729,000 Bonds: 5% $ 86,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 259,350 Mobilization 10% $ 172,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 259,350 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,507,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Roscher Rd to 1894 ft west of Roscher Rd roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 1,894 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,103 cy $ 16.91 $ 103,200 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 11,574 sy $ 11.70 $ 135,421 B8 Underseal 11,574 sy $ 6.46 $ 74,771 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 11,574 sy $ 18.99 $ 219,799 B13 lConcrete Median 7,576 sf $ 53.96 $ 408,801 D4 ISidewalk 6,313 sy $ 50.00 $ 315,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,257,658 711 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 50,306 V Prep ROW 4% $ 50,306 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 37,730 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 62,883 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 440,180 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 62,883 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 62,883 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,153 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 75,459 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 817,478 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,075,136 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 415,027 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,491,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,491,000 Bonds: 5% $ 124,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 373,650 Mobilization 10% $ 249,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 373,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,612,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Hustlin Hornet Dr to Glenoak Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,302 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,418 cy $ 16.91 $ 125,431 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 14,068 sy $ 11.70 $ 164,593 B8 Underseal 14,068 sy $ 6.46 $ 90,878 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 14,068 sy $ 18.99 $ 267,147 B13 lConcrete Median 9,208 sf $ 53.96 $ 496,864 D4 ISidewalk 7,673 sy $ 50.00 $ 383,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,528,579 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 61,143 V Prep ROW 4% $ 61,143 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 45,857 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 76,429 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 535,003 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 76,429 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 76,429 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 30,572 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 91,715 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 993,576 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,522,156 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 504,431 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,027,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,027,000 Bonds: 5% $ 151,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 454,050 Mobilization 10% $ 302,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 454,050 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,389,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Glenoak Dr to Caribbean Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Arterial(A2) Length(If): 2,643 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 8,516 cy $ 16.91 $ 144,011 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 16,152 sy $ 11.70 $ 188,975 B8 JUnderseal 16,152 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 104,340 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 16,152 sy $ 18.99 $ 306,720 B13 lConcrete Median 10,572 sf $ 53.96 $ 570,465 D4 ISidewalk 8,810 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,755,011 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 70,200 V Prep ROW 4% $ 70,200 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 52,650 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 87,751 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 614,254 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,751 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,751 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,100 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,301 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,540,757 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,295,768 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 659,154 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,955,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,955,000 Bonds: 5% $ 197,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 593,250 Mobilization 10% $ 395,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 593,250 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,735,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-1 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Caribbean Dr to Mediterranean Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,740 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,573 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,155 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,567 sy $ 11.70 $ 147,030 B8 JUnderseal 12,567 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 81,181 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,567 sy $ 18.99 $ 238,641 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 290,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 868,007 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,773— V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,720 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,040 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,400 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 303,802 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,400 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,400 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,360 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,080 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 564,204 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,432,211 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 286,442 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,719,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,719,000 Bonds: 5% $ 85,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 257,850 Mobilization 10% $ 171,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 257,850 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,493,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-J This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Mediterranean Dr to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 3,569 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 13,483 cy $ 16.91 $ 227,996 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 25,776 sy $ 11.70 $ 301,581 B8 Underseal 25,776 sy $ 6.46 $ 166,514 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 25,776 sy $ 18.99 $ 489,488 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 11,897 sy $ 50.00 $ 594,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,780,412 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 71,216 V Prep ROW 4% $ 71,216 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 53,412 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 89,021 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 623,144 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,021 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,021 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 35,608 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 106,825 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,557,267 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,337,679 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 667,536 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,006,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,006,000 Bonds: 5% $ 200,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 600,900 Mobilization 10% $ 400,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 600,900 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,809,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-L This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Division Rd to Purdue Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 1,319 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 4,983 cy $ 16.91 $ 84,261 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 9,526 sy $ 11.70 $ 111,455 B8 Underseal 9,526 sy $ 6.46 $ 61,539 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 9,526 sy $ 18.99 $ 180,901 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,397 sy $ 50.00 $ 219,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 657,989 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance f Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 26,320 V Prep ROW 4% $ 26,320 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,740 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 32,899 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 230,296 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,899 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 32,899 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,160 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,479 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 427,693 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,085,682 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 217,136 Construction Cost TOT $ 1,303,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,303,000 Bonds: 5% $ 65,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 195,450 Mobilization 10% $ 130,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 195,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,889,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-M This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Purdue Rd to Glenoak Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,623 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,909 cy $ 16.91 $ 167,563 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 18,944 sy $ 11.70 $ 221,643 B8 JUnderseal 18,944 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 122,378 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 18,944 sy $ 18.99 $ 359,744 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,743 sy $ 50.00 $ 437,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,308,495 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,340 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,340 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,255 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,425 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 457,973 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,425 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,425 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,170 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 78,510 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 850,522 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,159,017 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 431,803 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,591,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,591,000 Bonds: 5% $ 129,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 388,650 Mobilization 10% $ 259,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 388,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,757,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-N This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Glenoak Dr to Caribbean Dr roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,663 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,060 cy $ 16.91 $ 170,118 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,233 sy $ 11.70 $ 225,024 B8 JUnderseal 19,233 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 124,244 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,233 sy $ 18.99 $ 365,230 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,877 sy $ 50.00 $ 443,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,328,449 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 53,138 V Prep ROW 4% $ 53,138 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,853 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 66,422 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 464,957 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,422 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,422 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,569 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,707 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,263,492 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,591,941 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 518,388 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,111,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,111,000 Bonds: 5% $ 155,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 466,650 Mobilization 10% $ 311,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 466,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,511,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- • Project Number: 17-0 This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Caribbean Dr to Ramfield Rd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,650 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,011 cy $ 16.91 $ 169,288 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,139 sy $ 11.70 $ 223,925 B8 JUnderseal 19,139 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 123,637 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,139 sy $ 18.99 $ 363,447 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,833 sy $ 50.00 $ 441,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,321,964 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,879 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,879 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,659 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 66,098 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 462,687 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,098 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,098 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,439 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 79,318 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,259,277 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,581,241 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 516,248 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,098,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,098,000 Bonds: 5% $ 154,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 464,700 Mobilization 10% $ 309,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 464,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 4,492,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 17-P This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Ramfield Rd to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Minor Arterial(Al) Length(If): 2,633 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 9,947 cy $ 16.91 $ 168,202 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,016 sy $ 11.70 $ 222,488 B8 JUnderseal 19,016 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 122,844 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,016 sy $ 18.99 $ 361,116 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,777 sy $ 50.00 $ 438,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,313,484 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 52,539 V Prep ROW 4% $ 52,539 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 39,405 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 65,674 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 459,719 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,674 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 65,674 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,270 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 78,809 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 853,764 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,167,248 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 433,450 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,601,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,601,000 Bonds: 5% $ 130,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 390,150 Mobilization 10% $ 260,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 390,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,771,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 17-Q Project Number: 17-Q This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Roscher Rd(Constructed Segment)to Glenoak Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 264 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 645 cy $ 16.91 $ 10,913 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 1,203 sy $ 13.78 $ 16,573 B8 IUnderseal I 1,203 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 7,769 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 1,261 sy $ 5.65 $ 7,127 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 880 sy $ 50.00 $ 44,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 86,381 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 3,455 V Prep ROW 4% $ 3,455 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 2,591 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 4,319 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 30,233 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 4,319 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 4,319 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 1,728 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 5,183 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 56,148 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 142,529 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 28,506 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 172,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 172,000 Bonds: 5% $ 8,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 25,800 Mobilization 10% $ 17,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 25,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 249,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 17-R Project Number: 17-R This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Flour Bluff Dr to Glenoak Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,488 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,971 cy $ 16.91 $ 185,514 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 20,445 sy $ 13.78 $ 281,737 B8 IUnderseal I 20,445 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 132,077 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 21,443 sy $ 5.65 $ 121,151 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 14,960 sy $ 50.00 $ 748,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,468,479 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 58,739 V Prep ROW 4% $ 58,739 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 44,054 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 73,424 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 513,968 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,424 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 73,424 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 29,370 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 88,109 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,354,511 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,822,990 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 564,598 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,388,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,388,000 Bonds: 5% $ 169,400 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 508,200 Mobilization 10% $ 338,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 508,200 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,913,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informat Description: Project No. 17-S Project Number: 17-S This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Glenoak Dr to Caribbean Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,640 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,453 cy $ 16.91 $ 109,126 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,027 sy $ 13.78 $ 165,727 B8 IUnderseal I 12,027 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 77,692 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,613 sy $ 5.65 $ 71,265 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,800 sy $ 50.00 $ 440,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 863,811 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 34,552 V Prep ROW 4% $ 34,552 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 25,914 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 43,191 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 302,334 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,191 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,191 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,276 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,829 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 961,477 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,825,288 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 365,058 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,191,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,191,000 Bonds: 5% $ 109,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 328,650 Mobilization 10% $ 219,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 328,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,177,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 17-T Project Number: 17-T This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Caribbean Dr to Ramfield Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,798 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,841 cy $ 16.91 $ 115,673 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,748 sy $ 13.78 $ 175,671 B8 IUnderseal I 12,748 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 82,354 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 13,370 sy $ 5.65 $ 75,541 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,328 sy $ 50.00 $ 466,400 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 915,640 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 36,626 V Prep ROW 4% $ 36,626 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 27,469 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 45,782 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 320,474 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,782 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 45,782 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,313 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 54,938 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 995,166 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,910,805 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 382,161 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,293,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,293,000 Bonds: 5% $ 114,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 343,950 Mobilization 10% $ 229,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 343,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,325,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Inro—rmatfo—rV ..... Description: Project No. 17-V Project Number: 17-V This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Yorktown Blvd to Flour Bluff Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,035 cy $ 16.91 $ 152,776 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 16,837 sy $ 13.78 $ 232,018 B8 IUnderseal I 16,837 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 108,769 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 17,659 sy $ 5.65 $ 99,771 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,209,335 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 48,373 V Prep ROW 4% $ 48,373 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 60,467 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 423,267 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,467 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,467 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,187 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 72,560 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,186,068 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,395,403 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 479,081 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,875,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,875,000 Bonds: 5% $ 143,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 431,250 Mobilization 10% $ 287,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 431,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,169,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 17-W Project Number: 17-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Flour Bluff Dr to Yorktown Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,696 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 9,035 cy $ 16.91 $ 152,776 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 16,837 sy $ 13.78 $ 232,018 B8 IUnderseal I 16,837 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 108,769 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 17,659 sy $ 5.65 $ 99,771 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 12,320 sy $ 50.00 $ 616,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,209,335 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 48,373 V Prep ROW 4% $ 48,373 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 36,280 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 60,467 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 423,267 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,467 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 60,467 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 24,187 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 72,560 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,186,068 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,395,403 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 479,081 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,875,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,875,000 Bonds: 5% $ 143,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 431,250 Mobilization 10% $ 287,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 431,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,169,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 17-X Project Number: 17-X This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Glenoak Dr(Constructed Segment)to Roscher Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,320 Service Area(s): Flour Bluff 2 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,227 cy $ 16.91 $ 54,563 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,013 sy $ 13.78 $ 82,864 B8 IUnderseal I 6,013 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 38,846 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 6,307 sy $ 5.65 $ 35,633 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,400 sy $ 50.00 $ 220,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 431,905 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 17,276 V Prep ROW 4% $ 17,276 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,957 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 21,595 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 151,167 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,595 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,638 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,914 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 712,644 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 142,529 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 856,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 856,000 Bonds: 5% $ 42,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 128,400 Mobilization 10% $ 85,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 128,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,241,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Beach Access Rd 2 to Sea Way Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 4,100 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 18,222 cy $ 16.91 $ 308,138 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 35,078 sy $ 11.70 $ 410,410 B8 Underseal 35,078 sy $ 6.46 $ 226,602 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 35,078 sy $ 18.99 $ 666,127 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,667 sy $ 50.00 $ 683,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,294,611 Major Construction Component Allowances: .7�:J Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 91,784 V Prep ROW 4% $ 91,784 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 68,838 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 114,731 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 803,114 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 114,731 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 114,731 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 45,892 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 137,677 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,891,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,186,107 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 837,221 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,0241 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,024,000 Bonds: 5% $ 251,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 753,600 Mobilization 10% $ 502,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 753,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,285,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-B This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sea Way Dr to 1043'N of La Concha Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 2,270 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,089 cy $ 16.91 $ 170,603 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 19,421 sy $ 11.70 $ 227,227 B8 Underseal 19,421 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 125,460 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 19,421 sy $ 18.99 $ 368,807 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 7,567 sy $ 50.00 $ 378,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,270,431 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 50,817 V Prep ROW 4% $ 50,817 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 38,113 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 63,522 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 444,651 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 63,522 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 63,522 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,409 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 76,226 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 825,780 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,096,211 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 419,242 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,516,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,516,000 Bonds: 5% $ 125,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 377,400 Mobilization 10% $ 251,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 377,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,648,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1043'N of La Concha Blvd to 1053'S of Beach View Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 2,830 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,578 cy $ 16.91 $ 212,690 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 24,212 sy $ 11.70 $ 283,283 B8 Underseal 24,212 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 156,411 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 24,212 sy $ 18.99 $ 459,790 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 9,433 sy $ 50.00 $ 471,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,583,841 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 63,354 V Prep ROW 4% $ 63,354 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 47,515 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 79,192 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 554,344 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,192 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,192 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 31,677 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 95,030 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,429,497 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,013,338 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 602,668 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,617,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,617,000 Bonds: 5% $ 180,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 542,550 Mobilization 10% $ 361,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 542,550 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,245,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1053'S of Beach View Dr to 1350'N of Beach View Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 2,393 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,636 cy $ 16.91 $ 179,847 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,473 sy $ 11.70 $ 239,539 B8 Underseal 20,473 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 132,258 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,473 sy $ 18.99 $ 388,791 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 7,977 sy $ 50.00 $ 398,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,339,269 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 53,571 V Prep ROW 4% $ 53,571 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 40,178 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 66,963 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 468,744 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,963 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 66,963 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 26,785 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 80,356 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 870,525 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,209,794 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 441,959 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,652,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,652,000 Bonds: 5% $ 132,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 397,800 Mobilization 10% $ 265,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 397,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,845,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1350'N of Beach View Dr to Seacomber Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 1,225 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 5,444 cy $ 16.91 $ 92,066 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,481 sy $ 11.70 $ 122,623 B8 Underseal 10,481 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 67,704 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,481 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 199,026 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,083 sy $ 50.00 $ 204,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 685,585 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 27,423 V Prep ROW 4% $ 27,423 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 20,568 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 34,279 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 239,955 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,279 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,279 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 13,712 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 41,135 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 445,630 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,131,215 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 226,243 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,358,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,358,000 Bonds: 5% $ 67,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 203,700 Mobilization 10% $ 135,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 203,700 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,969,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-F This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Seacomber Dr to 462'N of Porto Villageo Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 1,472 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 6,542 cy $ 16.91 $ 110,629 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 12,594 sy $ 11.70 $ 147,347 B8 Underseal 12,594 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 81,356 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 12,594 sy $ 18.99 $ 239,156 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 4,907 sy $ 50.00 $ 245,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 823,821 Major Construction Component Allowances: %1 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 32,953 V Prep ROW 4% $ 32,953 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 24,715 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 41,191 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 288,337 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,191 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,191 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,476 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 49,429 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 535,484 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,359,305 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 271,861 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,632,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,632,000 Bonds: 5% $ 81,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 244,800 Mobilization 10% $ 163,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 244,800 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 2,366,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1 ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-G This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 462'N of Porto Villageo Drto 1283'N of Mustang Island roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 2,421 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 10,760 cy $ 16.91 $ 181,952 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 20,713 sy $ 11.70 $ 242,342 B8 Underseal 20,713 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 133,806 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 20,713 sy $ 18.99 $ 393,340 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 8,070 sy $ 50.00 $ 403,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,354,940 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 54,198 V Prep ROW 4% $ 54,198 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 40,648 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 67,747 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 474,229 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,747 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,747 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,099 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,296 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 880,711 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,235,650 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 447,130 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,683,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,683,000 Bonds: 5% $ 134,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 402,450 Mobilization 10% $ 268,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 402,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 3,890,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 18-H This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1283'N of Mustang Island Estates Drto 211'N of Marineroadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 2,708 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 12,036 cy $ 16.91 $ 203,521 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 23,168 sy $ 11.70 $ 271,071 B8 Underseal 23,168 sy $ 6.46 $ 149,668 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 23,168 sy $ 18.99 $ 439,969 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 9,027 sy $ 50.00 $ 451,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,515,562 Major Construction Component Allowances: _..:=111 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 60,622 V Prep ROW 4% $ 60,622 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 45,467 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 75,778 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 530,447 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 75,778 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 75,778 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 30,311 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 90,934 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,385,115 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,900,678 Construction Contingency: Q070 $ 580,136 Construction Cost TOT $ 3,481,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,481,000 Bonds: 5% $ 174,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 522,150 Mobilization 10% $ 348,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 522,150 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 5,047,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 18-1 Project Number: 18-1 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 460'S of Bikini Dr to Access Road 2 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,069 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,502 cy $ 16.91 $ 126,859 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 13,981 sy $ 13.78 $ 192,658 B8 IUnderseal I 13,981 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 90,317 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 14,663 sy $ 5.65 $ 82,846 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 10,230 sy $ 50.00 $ 511,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,004,180 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 40,167 V Prep ROW 4% $ 40,167 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 30,125 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 50,209 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 351,463 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,209 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 50,209 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 20,084 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 60,251 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,052,717 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,056,897 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 411,379 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,469,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,469,000 Bonds: 5% $ 123,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 370,350 Mobilization 10% $ 246,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 370,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,580,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 18-J Project Number: 18-J This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Access Rd No 2 to Sea Way Dr(Proposed Segment) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 4,150 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 10,144 cy $ 16.91 $ 171,543 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 18,906 sy $ 13.78 $ 260,519 B8 IUnderseal I 18,906 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 122,130 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 19,828 sy $ 5.65 $ 112,027 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 13,833 sy $ 50.00 $ 691,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,357,885 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 54,315 V Prep ROW 4% $ 54,315 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 40,737 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 67,894 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 475,260 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,894 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,894 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,158 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,473 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,282,625 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,640,510 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 528,102 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,169,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,169,000 Bonds: 5% $ 158,450 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 475,350 Mobilization 10% $ 316,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 475,350 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,595,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-K Project Number: 18-K This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sea Way Dr(Proposed Segment)to 1-C roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,300 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,622 cy $ 16.91 $ 95,072 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 10,478 sy $ 13.78 $ 144,384 B8 IUnderseal I 10,478 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 67,686 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 10,989 sy $ 5.65 $ 62,087 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,667 sy $ 50.00 $ 383,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 752,563 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 30,103 V Prep ROW 4% $ 30,103 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 22,577 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 37,628 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 263,397 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,628 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,628 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,051 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 45,154 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 489,166 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,241,728 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 248,346 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,491,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,491,000 Bonds: 5% $ 74,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 223,650 Mobilization 10% $ 149,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 223,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,162,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 18-L Project Number: 18-L This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-C to 1-E roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,870 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 7,016 cy $ 16.91 $ 118,633 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 13,074 sy $ 13.78 $ 180,166 B8 IUnderseal I 13,074 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 84,461 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 13,712 sy $ 5.65 $ 77,474 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,567 sy $ 50.00 $ 478,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 939,067 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 37,563 V Prep ROW 4% $ 37,563 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 28,172 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 46,953 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 328,674 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,953 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,953 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,781 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 56,344 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,010,394 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,949,461 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 389,892 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,340,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,340,000 Bonds: 5% $ 117,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 351,000 Mobilization 10% $ 234,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 351,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,393,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 18-M Project Number: 18-M This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-E to Seacomber Dr roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 3,550 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 8,678 cy $ 16.91 $ 146,741 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 16,172 sy $ 13.78 $ 222,853 B8 IUnderseal I 16,172 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 104,473 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 16,961 sy $ 5.65 $ 95,830 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 11,833 sy $ 50.00 $ 591,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,161,564 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 46,463 V Prep ROW 4% $ 46,463 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 34,847 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 58,078 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 406,547 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,078 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,078 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 23,231 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 69,694 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,155,017 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,316,581 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 463,316 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,780,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,780,000 Bonds: 5% $ 139,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 417,000 Mobilization 10% $ 278,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 417,000 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,031,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-N Project Number: 18-N This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Seacomber Dr to 1-G roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,520 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,716 cy $ 16.91 $ 62,830 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 6,924 sy $ 13.78 $ 95,419 B8 IUnderseal I 6,924 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 44,732 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 7,262 sy $ 5.65 $ 41,032 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,067 sy $ 50.00 $ 253,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 497,346 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 19,894 V Prep ROW 4% $ 19,894 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 14,920 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 24,867 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 174,071 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,867 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,867 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,947 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,841 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 323,275 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 820,620 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 164,124 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 985,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 985,000 Bonds: 5% $ 49,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 147,750 Mobilization 10% $ 98,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 147,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,428,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 18-0 Project Number: 18-0 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-G to 1-J roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,430 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,940 cy $ 16.91 $ 100,445 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 11,070 sy $ 13.78 $ 152,545 B8 IUnderseal I 11,070 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 71,512 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 11,610 sy $ 5.65 $ 65,597 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 8,100 sy $ 50.00 $ 405,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 795,099 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 31,804 V Prep ROW 4% $ 31,804 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 23,853 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 39,755 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 278,285 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,755 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,755 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,902 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 47,706 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 516,814 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,311,913 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 262,383 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,575,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,575,000 Bonds: 5% $ 78,750 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 236,250 Mobilization 10% $ 157,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 236,250 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,284,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 18-P Project Number: 18-P This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-J to City Limits roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 2,700 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 6,600 cy $ 16.91 $ 111,606 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 12,300 sy $ 13.78 $ 169,494 B8 IUnderseal I 12,300 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 79,458 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 12,900 sy $ 5.65 $ 72,885 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 9,000 sy $ 50.00 $ 450,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 883,443 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,338 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,338 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,503 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,172 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 309,205 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,172 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,172 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,669 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,007 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 974,238 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,857,681 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 371,536 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,230,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,230,000 Bonds: 5% $ 111,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 334,500 Mobilization 10% $ 223,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 334,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,234,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 18-Q Project Number: 18-Q This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX 361 to 1-A roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,250 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 3,056 cy $ 16.91 $ 51,669 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 5,694 sy $ 13.78 $ 78,469 B8 IUnderseal I 5,694 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 36,786 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 5,972 sy $ 5.65 $ 33,743 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,167 sy $ 50.00 $ 208,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 409,001 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 16,360 V Prep ROW 4% $ 16,360 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 12,270 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 20,450 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 143,150 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,450 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,450 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,180 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,540 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 265,851 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 674,852 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 134,970 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 810,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 810,000 Bonds: 5% $ 40,500 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 121,500 Mobilization 10% $ 81,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 121,500 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,175,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-R Project Number: 18-R This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Coastline to TX 361 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,755 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,290 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,544 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,995 sy $ 13.78 $ 110,171 B8 IUnderseal I 7,995 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 51,648 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,385 sy $ 5.65 $ 47,375 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,850 sy $ 50.00 $ 292,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 574,238 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,970 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,970 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,227 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,712 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 200,983 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,712 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,712 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,485 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 34,454 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 373,255 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 947,493 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 189,499 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,137,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,137,000 Bonds: 5% $ 56,850 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 170,550 Mobilization 10% $ 113,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 170,550 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,649,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-S Project Number: 18-S This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX 361 to 1-13 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,220 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,982 cy $ 16.91 $ 50,429 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 5,558 sy $ 13.78 $ 76,586 B8 IUnderseal I 5,558 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 35,903 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 5,829 sy $ 5.65 $ 32,933 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 4,067 sy $ 50.00 $ 203,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 399,185 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 15,967 V Prep ROW 4% $ 15,967 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 11,976 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 19,959 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 139,715 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,959 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,959 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,984 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 23,951 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 259,470 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 658,656 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 131,731 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 791,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 791,000 Bonds: 5% $ 39,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 118,650 Mobilization 10% $ 79,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 118,650 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,147,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-T Project Number: 18-T This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Coastline to TX 361 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,750 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,278 cy $ 16.91 $ 72,337 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 7,972 sy $ 13.78 $ 109,857 B8 IUnderseal I 7,972 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 51,501 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,361 sy $ 5.65 $ 47,240 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 5,833 sy $ 50.00 $ 291,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 572,602 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 22,904 V Prep ROW 4% $ 22,904 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,178 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 28,630 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 200,411 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,630 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 28,630 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,452 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 34,356 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 372,191 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 944,793 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 188,959 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,134,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,134,000 Bonds: 5% $ 56,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 170,100 Mobilization 10% $ 113,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 170,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,644,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-U Project Number: 18-U This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX 361 to 1-D roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 860 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,102 cy $ 16.91 $ 35,549 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,918 sy $ 13.78 $ 53,987 B8 IUnderseal I 3,918 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 25,309 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 4,109 sy $ 5.65 $ 23,215 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,867 sy $ 50.00 $ 143,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 281,393 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 11,256 V Prep ROW 4% $ 11,256 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 8,442 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 14,070 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 98,488 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 14,070 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 14,070 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,628 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 16,884 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 182,905 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 464,298 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 92,860 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 558,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 558,000 Bonds: 5% $ 27,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 83,700 Mobilization 10% $ 55,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 83,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 809,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-rV "" Description: Project No. 18-V Project Number: 18-V This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX 361 to Coastline roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,815 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,437 cy $ 16.91 $ 75,024 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,268 sy $ 13.78 $ 113,938 B8 IUnderseal I 8,268 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 53,413 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,672 sy $ 5.65 $ 48,995 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,050 sy $ 50.00 $ 302,500 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 593,870 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 23,755 V Prep ROW 4% $ 23,755 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 17,816 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 29,694 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 207,855 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,694 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,694 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,877 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,632 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 386,016 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 979,886 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 195,977 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,176,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,176,000 Bonds: 5% $ 58,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 176,400 Mobilization 10% $ 117,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 176,400 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,705,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- 'k�, Description: Project No. 18-W Project Number: 18-W This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: La Concha Blvd to Coastline roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 893 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,183 cy $ 16.91 $ 36,913 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,068 sy $ 13.78 $ 56,059 B8 IUnderseal I 4,068 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 26,280 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 4,267 sy $ 5.65 $ 24,106 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,977 sy $ 50.00 $ 148,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 292,191 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 11,688 V Prep ROW 4% $ 11,688 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 8,766 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 14,610 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 102,267 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 14,610 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 14,610 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,844 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 17,531 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 189,924 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 482,114 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 96,423 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 579,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 579,000 Bonds: 5% $ 28,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 86,850 Mobilization 10% $ 57,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 86,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 840,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 18-X Project Number: 18-X This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-F to TX 361 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 830 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,029 cy $ 16.91 $ 34,309 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,781 sy $ 13.78 $ 52,104 B8 IUnderseal I 3,781 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 24,426 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,966 sy $ 5.65 $ 22,405 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,767 sy $ 50.00 $ 138,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 271,577 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,863 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,863 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 8,147 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 13,579 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 95,052 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,579 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,579 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,432 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 16,295 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 176,525 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 448,102 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 89,620 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 538,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 538,000 Bonds: 5% $ 26,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 80,700 Mobilization 10% $ 53,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 80,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 780,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 18-Y Project Number: 18-Y This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-H to TX 361 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 810 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,980 cy $ 16.91 $ 33,482 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,690 sy $ 13.78 $ 50,848 B8 IUnderseal I 3,690 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 23,837 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,870 sy $ 5.65 $ 21,866 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,700 sy $ 50.00 $ 135,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 265,033 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,601 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,601 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,951 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 13,252 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 92,762 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,252 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,252 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,301 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,902 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 172,271 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 437,304 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 87,461 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 525,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 525,000 Bonds: 5% $ 26,250 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 78,750 Mobilization 10% $ 52,500 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 78,750 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 761,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n`k�, Description: Project No. 18-Z Project Number: 18-Z This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: 1-1 to TX 361 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 790 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,931 cy $ 16.91 $ 32,655 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 3,599 sy $ 13.78 $ 49,593 B8 IUnderseal I 3,599 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 23,249 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 3,774 sy $ 5.65 $ 21,326 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 2,633 sy $ 50.00 $ 131,667 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 258,489 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 10,340 V Prep ROW 4% $ 10,340 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 7,755 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 12,924 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 90,471 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,924 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,924 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 5,170 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,509 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 168,018 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 426,507 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 85,301 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 512,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 512,000 Bonds: 5% $ 25,600 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 76,800 Mobilization 10% $ 51,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 76,800 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 742,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-rV "" Description: Project No. 18-AA Project Number: 18-AA This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX 361 to Coastline roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,873 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,578 cy $ 16.91 $ 77,421 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,533 sy $ 13.78 $ 117,579 B8 IUnderseal I 8,533 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 55,120 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 8,949 sy $ 5.65 $ 50,561 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,243 sy $ 50.00 $ 312,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 612,848 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,514 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,514 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,385 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 30,642 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 214,497 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,642 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,642 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,257 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 36,771 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 398,351 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,011,199 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 202,240 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,214,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,214,000 Bonds: 5% $ 60,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 182,100 Mobilization 10% $ 121,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 182,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,760,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-rV "" Description: Project No. 18-AB Project Number: 18-AB This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: TX 361 to Coastline roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,910 Service Area(s): Padre Island 1 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,669 cy $ 16.91 $ 78,951 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,701 sy $ 13.78 $ 119,901 B8 IUnderseal I 8,701 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 56,209 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,126 sy $ 5.65 $ 51,559 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,367 sy $ 50.00 $ 318,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 624,954 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,998 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,998 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,749 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 31,248 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 218,734 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,248 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,248 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,499 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,497 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 406,220 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,031,174 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 206,235 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,238,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,238,000 Bonds: 5% $ 61,900 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 185,700 Mobilization 10% $ 123,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 185,700 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,795,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Study ��PAPE-DEWS ON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 19-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Gulf Beach Access Road 3 to Beach Access Rd 2 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 24,600 Service Area(s): Padre Island 2 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 109,333 cy $ 16.91 $ 1,848,827 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 210,467 sy $ 11.70 $ 2,462,460 B8 Underseal 210,467 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 1,359,615 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 210,467 sy $ 18.99 $ 3,996,762 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 82,000 sy $ 50.00 $ 4,100,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 13,767,663 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 550,707 V Prep ROW 4% $ 550,707 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 413,030 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 688,383 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 4,818,682 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 688,383 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 688,383 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 275,353 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 826,060 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 3,600,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 12,548,981 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 26,316,645 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 5,263,329 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 31,580,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 31,580,000 Bonds: 5% $ 1,579,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 4,737,000 Mobilization 10% $ 3,158,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 4,737,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 45,791,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 20-A This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: S Padre Island Drto 572'East of S Padre Island Dr roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 572 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit 7Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,542 cy $ 16.91 $ 42,989 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 4,894 sy $ 11.70 $ 57,257 B8 Underseal 4,894 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,614 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 4,894 sy 1 $ 18.99 $ 92,933 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 1,907 sy $ 50.00 $ 95,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 320,126 Major Construction Component Allowances: 71 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 12,805 V Prep ROW 4% $ 12,805 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 9,604 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 16,006 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 112,044 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,006 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 16,006 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 6,403 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 19,208 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 208,082 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 528,208 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 105,642 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 634,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 634,000 Bonds: 5% $ 31,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 95,100 Mobilization 10% $ 63,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 95,100 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 919,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection I ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 20-B This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 572'East of S Padre Island Dr to Zahn Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 3,955 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 17,578 cy $ 16.91 $ 297,240 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 33,837 sy $ 11.70 $ 395,896 B8 Underseal 33,837 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 218,588 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 33,837 sy $ 18.99 $ 642,569 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 13,183 sy $ 50.00 $ 659,167 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,213,460 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 88,538 V Prep ROW 4% $ 88,538 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 66,404 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 110,673 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 774,711 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 110,673 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 110,673 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 44,269 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 132,808 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 400,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,838,749 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,052,208 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 810,442 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,863,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,863,000 Bonds: 5% $ 243,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 729,450 Mobilization 10% $ 486,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 729,450 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 7,051,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 20-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Zahn Rd to Newport Pass Rd roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 5,490 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description Expansion Project No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 24,400 cy $ 16.91 $ 412,604 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 46,970 sy $ 11.70 $ 549,549 B8 Underseal 46,970 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 303,426 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 46,970 sy $ 18.99 $ 891,960 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 18,300 sy $ 50.00 $ 915,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,072,540 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 122,902 V Prep ROW 4% $ 122,902 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 92,176 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 153,627 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,075,389 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 153,627 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 153,627 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 61,451 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 184,352 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,797,151 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,869,690 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,173,938 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,0441 000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,044,000 Bonds: 5% $ 352,200 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,056,600 Mobilization 10% $ 704,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,056,600 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 10,214,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • ■- 1 Project Number: 20-D This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Newport Pass Rd to Gulf Beach Access Road 3 roadway. Costing Class: Primary Rural Arterial(RA3) Length(If): 6,272 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description Expansion Project oadway Construction Cost Projection No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 27,876 cy $ 16.91 $ 471,376 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 53,660 sy $ 11.70 $ 627,827 B8 Underseal 53,660 sy $ 6.46 $ 346,646 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 53,660 sy $ 18.99 $ 1,019,012 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 20,907 sy $ 50.00 $ 1,045,333 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,510,194 Major Construction Component Allowances: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 140,408 V Prep ROW 4% $ 140,408 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 105,306 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 175,510 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 1,228,568 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 175,510 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 175,510 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 70,204 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 210,612 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 800,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,081,626 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,591,821 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,318,364 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,911,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,911,000 Bonds: 5% $ 395,550 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,186,650 Mobilization 10% $ 791,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 1,186,650 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 11,471,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo_n- "�,�, Description: Project No. 20-E Project Number: 20-E This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Park Rd 22 to Packery Channel Park Rd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 8,448 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 20,651 cy $ 16.91 $ 349,203 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 38,485 sy $ 13.78 $ 530,328 B8 IUnderseal I 38,485 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 248,615 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 40,363 sy $ 5.65 $ 228,049 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 28,160 sy $ 50.00 $ 1,408,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,764,195 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 110,568 V Prep ROW 4% $ 110,568 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 82,926 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 138,210 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 967,468 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 138,210 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 138,210 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 55,284 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 165,852 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ 1,200,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,996,727 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,760,922 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,152,184 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,914,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,914,000 Bonds: 5% $ 345,700 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 1,037,100 Mobilization 10% $ 691,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 1,037,100 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 10,025,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 20-1 Project Number: 20-1 This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Park Rd 22 to Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Section) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 575 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,406 cy $ 16.91 $ 23,768 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,619 sy $ 13.78 $ 36,096 B8 IUnderseal I 2,619 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 16,922 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 2,747 sy $ 5.65 $ 15,522 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,917 sy $ 50.00 $ 95,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 188,141 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 7,526 V Prep ROW 4% $ 7,526 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 5,644 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 9,407 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 65,849 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,407 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,407 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,763 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 11,288 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 122,291 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 310,432 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 62,086 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 373,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 373,000 Bonds: 5% $ 18,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 55,950 Mobilization 10% $ 37,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 55,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 541,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 20-J Project Number: 20-J This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Park Rd 22 to Sand Dollar Ave(Proposed Section) roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 575 Service Area(s): Padre Island 3 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,406 cy $ 16.91 $ 23,768 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,619 sy $ 13.78 $ 36,096 B8 IUnderseal I 2,619 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 16,922 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 2,747 sy $ 5.65 $ 15,522 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,917 sy $ 50.00 $ 95,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 188,141 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 7,526 V Prep ROW 4% $ 7,526 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 5,644 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 9,407 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 65,849 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,407 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,407 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,763 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 11,288 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 122,291 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 310,432 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 62,086 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 373,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 373,000 Bonds: 5% $ 18,650 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 55,950 Mobilization 10% $ 37,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 55,950 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 541,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 21-C This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: Sea Pines Dr to Allamanda Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 1,584 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 7 Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 3,960 cy $ 16.91 $ 66,964 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 7,392 sy $ 11.70 $ 86,486 B8 Underseal 7,392 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 47,752 B11 8"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 7,392 sy $ 18.99 $ 140,374 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 5,280 sy $ 50.00 $ 264,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 605,576 Major Construction Component Allowances: 111111% Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 24,223 V Prep ROW 4% $ 24,223 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 18,167 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 30,279 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 211,952 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,279 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 30,279 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,112 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 36,335 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 393,625 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 999,201 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 199,840 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,200,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,200,000 Bonds: 5% $ 60,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 180,000 Mobilization 10% $ 120,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 180,000 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,740,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. 16� City of Corpus Christi Rough Proportionality Studyp PAPE-DAWSON Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection / ENGINEERS Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project • • Description: Project Number: 21-E This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing Limits: 1,079 ft South of White Cap Blvd to Access Rd 4 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,073 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description Expansion Project r, No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 72 Excavation(Roadway) 2,623 cy $ 16.91 $ 44,353 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,888 sy $ 13.78 $ 67,358 B8 Underseal 4,888 1 sy 1 $ 6.46 $ 31,577 B12 12"Compacted Subgrade 5,127 sy $ 5.65 $ 28,965 B13.X I No Median 0 sf $ - $ - D4 ISidewalk 3,577 sy $ 50.00 $ 178,833 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 351,087 Major Construction Component Allowances: I Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 14,043 V Prep ROW 4% $ 14,043 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,533 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 17,554 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 122,880 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,554 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,554 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,022 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,065 v Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 228,206 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 579,293 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 115,859 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 696,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 696,000 Bonds: 5% $ 34,800 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 104,400 Mobilization 10% $ 69,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15%1 $ 104,400 Project Cost TOTAL:1 $ 1,009,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 21-A Project Number: 21-A This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sea Pines Dr to 2,326 ft North of Sea Pines Dr roadway. Costing Class: Secondary Collector(C2) Length(If): 2,323 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 5,808 cy $ 16.91 $ 98,213 B7 1"Type'B'HMAC 10,842 sy $ 11.70 $ 126,847 B8 IUnderseal I 10,842 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 70,037 B118"Lime stabilized(8%),12"Compacted Subgrade 10,842 sy $ 18.99 $ 205,882 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 7,744 sy $ 50.00 $ 387,200 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 888,179 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 35,527 V Prep ROW 4% $ 35,527 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 26,645 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 44,409 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 310,863 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,409 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,409 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 17,764 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,291 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 577,316 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,465,495 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 293,099 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,759,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,759,000 Bonds: 5% $ 87,950 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 263,850 Mobilization 10% $ 175,900 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 263,850 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,551,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informatfo-n- ' Description: Project No. 21-13 Project Number: 21-B This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: White Cap Blvd to 1,079 ft South of White Cap Blvd roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,081 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 2,643 cy $ 16.91 $ 44,698 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 4,926 sy $ 13.78 $ 67,882 B8 IUnderseal I 4,926 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 31,823 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 5,166 sy $ 5.65 $ 29,190 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 3,604 sy $ 50.00 $ 180,223 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 353,816 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 14,153 V Prep ROW 4% $ 14,153 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 10,614 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 17,691 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 123,835 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,691 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,691 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,076 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,229 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 229,980 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 583,796 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 116,759 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 701,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 701,000 Bonds: 5% $ 35,050 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 105,150 Mobilization 10% $ 70,100 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 105,150 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,016,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 21-F Project Number: 21-F This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Access Rd 6 to 504'N of Access Rd 6 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 504 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,232 cy $ 16.91 $ 20,833 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,296 sy $ 13.78 $ 31,639 B8 IUnderseal I 2,296 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 14,832 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 2,408 sy $ 5.65 $ 13,605 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,680 sy $ 50.00 $ 84,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 164,909 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 6,596 V Prep ROW 4% $ 6,596 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 4,947 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 8,245 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 57,718 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,245 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,245 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,298 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 9,895 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 107,191 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 272,100 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 54,420 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 327,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 327,000 Bonds: 5% $ 16,350 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 49,050 Mobilization 10% $ 32,700 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 49,050 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 474,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Description: Project No. 21-G Project Number: 21-G This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Palmira Ave to Park Rd 22 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 528 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 1,291 cy $ 16.91 $ 21,825 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 2,405 sy $ 13.78 $ 33,145 B8 IUnderseal I 2,405 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 15,538 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 2,523 sy $ 5.65 $ 14,253 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 1,760 sy $ 50.00 $ 88,000 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 172,762 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 6,910 V Prep ROW 4% $ 6,910 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 5,183 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 8,638 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 60,467 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,638 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,638 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 3,455 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 10,366 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 112,295 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 285,058 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 57,012 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 343,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 343,000 Bonds: 5% $ 17,150 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 51,450 Mobilization 10% $ 34,300 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 51,450 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 497,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi PAPE-DAWSON Rough Proportionality Study rd ENGINEERS Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Worksheet Last Updated:04/10/2022 Project Informat Description: Project No. 21-H Project Number: 21-H This project consists of the construction of a completely new Limits: Sea Pines Dr to Park Rd 22 roadway. Costing Class: Collector(Cl) Length(If): 1,954 Service Area(s): Padre Island 4 Description New Project Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost B2 Excavation(Roadway) 4,775 cy $ 16.91 $ 80,753 B6 1"Type'D'HMAC 8,900 sy $ 13.78 $ 122,638 B8 IUnderseal I 8,900 I sy I $ 6.46 I $ 57,492 B1212"Compacted Subgrade 9,334 sy $ 5.65 $ 52,736 B13.X No Median 0 sf $ $ D4 (Sidewalk I 6,512 sy $ 50.00 $ 325,600 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 639,220 ComponentMajor Construction Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost V Sidewalk Components Pedestrian Island 4% $ 25,569 V Prep ROW 4% $ 25,569 V Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 3% $ 19,177 V Pavement Markings/Markers 5% $ 31,961 V Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 223,727 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - V Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,961 V Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,961 V Landscaping(Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,784 V Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 38,353 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $400,000 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 415,493 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,054,713 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 210,943 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,266,000 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,266,000 Bonds: 5% $ 63,300 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 15% $ 189,900 Mobilization 10% $ 126,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: IFALSE 1 15% $ 189,900 Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,836,000 NOTE:These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi. City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvements Plan 111111 ,1111 I I September 2023 1111 III TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................1-1 1.1. General Overview......................................................................................................................1-1 1.2. Outline of Scope.........................................................................................................................1-2 1.2. 1, Land Use Assumptions Update..........................................................................................1-2 1,2.2, Collect and Review of Existing Data...................................................................................1-2 1,2.3. Wastewater Mapping System Update...............................................................................1-3 11.4. Flow and Usage Development...........................................................................................1-3 1.2.5, Wastewater System Modeling...........................................................................................1-3 1,2.6, Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation.................................................................1-3 1.2.7, Review and Assess Wastewater Design Criteria................................................................1-4 1.1& Capital Improvement and Master Plan development. ......................................................1-4 1.3. Capital Improvement Advisory Council......................................................................................1-5 44f1STEV''vA i tip L"JLLEC `i0im AivU ikEATMENI SYSTEM..............................2-1 2.1. Wastewater Assets ....................................................................................................................2-1 2.1,1. Wastewater treatment plants. ..........................................................................................2-2 2,11.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains.............................................................................................2-2 11.3. Gravity collection system...................................................................................................2-3 2.2. Consent Decree..........................................................................................................................2-3 3. LAND USE ASSUivIPTIONS ..........................................................................3-1 3.1. Area Development Plans............................................................................................................3-1 3.2. Projected Growth Rate ..............................................................................................................3-2 3.3. Land Use.....................................................................................................................................3-6 4. WASTEWATER FLOWS................................................................................4-1 4.1. Master Plan methodology..........................................................................................................4-1 411, Wastewater Flows..............................................................................................................4-1 4.1.2. Domestic Wastewater........................................................................................................4-1 i 4,13. Industrial Wastewater........................................................................................................4-1 4,7..4, Inflow and Infiltration........................................................................................................4-2 4.2. Hydraulic Model.........................................................................................................................4-3 4.3. Current Flows.............................................................................................................................4-3 4.3.1. Infiltration and Inflow........................................................................................................4-4 4.4. Future Flows...............................................................................................................................4-5 4.4.1, Ultimate Flows...................................................................................................................4-7 5. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION.........................................................5-1 5.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants...................................................................................................5-1 5.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains.....................................................................................................5-3 5.2.1. Allison Wastewater Basin ..................................................................................................5-3 5.2.2, Broadway...........................................................................................................................5-7 5.2.3, Greenwood ........................................................................................................................5-8 5.2.4., London ...............................................................................................................................5-9 5.2.5, Laguna Madre..................................................................................................................5-10 5<2.6, Oso...................................................................................................................................5-11 5.2.7, White Cap.........................................................................................................................5-12 5.3. Gravity Collection System........................................................................................................5-13 5.3.1.. Allison...............................................................................................................................5-13 5.3,2., Broadway.........................................................................................................................5-14 5.3.1 Greenwood ......................................................................................................................5-14 5.3.4. Oso...................................................................................................................................5-14 6. COST FACTORS...........................................................................................6-1 6.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants...................................................................................................6-1 6.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains.....................................................................................................6-2 6.3. Gravity Collection System..........................................................................................................6-3 i. CAr�iiALIM"' Oi VEi` EI"'Y6..........................................................................7- ii UST OF TABLET Table 2-1 Water Treatment Plants.............................................................................................................2-2 Table 3-1 Projected Annual Growth by households..................................................................................3-2 Table 3-2 Projected Annual Growth by Employees...................................................................................3-3 Table 3-3 MPO Annual Growth Rate vs. Annual Growth Rate by Lot Additioins.......................................3-3 Table 3-4 Historic Growth Rate by ADP.....................................................................................................3-4 Table 3-5 Growth Rates Reviewed and Selected.......................................................................................3-5 Table 3-6 Projected 10-Year Commercial and Residental Growth by ADP...............................................3-6 Table 4-1 Water Recovery Rates................................................................................................................4-3 Table4-2. 1/1 Evalauation...........................................................................................................................4-4 Table 4-3 Projected 10-Year Flows for Broadway WWTP..........................................................................4-6 Table 4-4 Current and 10-Year Flows.........................................................................................................4-6 Table 4-5 Predicted Flows by Service Area................................................................................................4-7 Table 5-1 WWTP Current and Projected Flows .........................................................................................5-1 Table 5-2 Expansion Planning Timing........................................................................................................5-2 Table 5-3. Allison System Summary...........................................................................................................5-6 Table 5-4 Broadway System Summary......................................................................................................5-7 Table 5-5 Greenwood System Summary....................................................................................................5-9 Table 5-6 Laguna Madre System Summary.............................................................................................5-10 Table5-7 Oso System Summary..............................................................................................................5-11 Table 5-8 White Cap System Summary....................................................................................................5-12 Table6-1 Project Costs ..............................................................................................................................6-1 Table 7-1. Near Term Improvements.........................................................................................................7-1 Table7-2. 10-Year Projects......................................................................................................................7-11 Table7-3. Ultimate Projects ....................................................................................................................7-13 AST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1. Wastewater Service Area iii Exhibit 2. Wastewater Treatment Plant Service Areas Exhibit 3. Allison Sewershed Exhibit 4. Broadway Sewershed Exhibit 5. Greenwood Sewershed Exhibit 6. Laguna Madre Sewershed Exhibit 7. Oso Sewershed Exhibit 8. Whitecap Sewershed Exhibit 9. Area Development Plans Exhibit 10. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Exhibit 11. Allison System Upgrades for Current Conditions. Exhibit 12. Broadway System Upgrades for Current Conditions Exhibit 13. Broadway System Upgrades for Ultimate Condition Exhibit 14. Greenwood System Upgrades for Current Conditions Exhibit 15. Greenwood System Upgrades for Ultimate Conditions Exhibit 16. London Area Wastewater Planning Exhibit 17. Laguna Madre Upgrades for Current Conditions Exhibit 18. Laguna Madre System Upgrades for Ultimate Flow Conditions Exhibit 19. Oso System Upgrades for Existing Conditions Exhibit 20. White Cap Upgrades LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Appendix B. Lift Station and Force Main Data Appendix C. Project Cost Sheets Appendix D. Individual Project Maps iv INTRODUCTION Corpus Christi Water (CCW) is responsible for the maintenance, operation, management, and expansion of wastewater collection systems that transport flows generated within the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (City).Wastewater collection withing the City must meet local,state,and federal regulatory requirements and the reasonable expectations of the public for a healthy, safe, and thriving community. This Wastewater System Master Plan is an overarching planning document intended to guide policy on maintenance, improvement, and expansion of wastewater services through a foreseeable planning horizon (ten years), and for the long term beyond the initial horizon. This plan sets forth identified areas where repair, replacement or upgrades of existing infrastructure are recommended to maintain service at acceptable levels and where upgraded and new infrastructure may be required to support ongoing growth and development. Proposed capital improvement,repair,and upgrade projects are recommended and general cost data is provided. 1.1. General Overview On February 9, 2021,the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, by Resolution 032350, approved Pape- Dawson Engineers to develop Master Planning and Impact Fee Studies for water,wastewater,stormwater and transportation. This Wastewater System Master Plan has been developed in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Title 12, Planning and Development, Subtitle C, Planning and Development Provisions Applying to More Than One Type of Local Government, Chapter 395 — Financing Capital Improvements Required by New Development in Municipalities, Counties, and Certain other Local Governments (Chapter 395). In addition, existing local codes and regulations including the City's Infrastructure Design Manual (IDM), Unified Development Code (UDC); minimum standards set forth by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and other relevant state and federal codes and regulations were considered in providing development, upgrade, and maintenance recommendations. Existing system conditions, The City's Comprehensive Plan, Area Development Plans, current and past Master Plans, Master Plan amendments, existing studies, billing information, usage and flow data, and land use information have been collected, reviewed, and assessed to develop planning and development guidance through a ten-year planning period and an ultimate buildout condition. This Master Plan meets the requirements of Chapter 395 for use in evaluating impacts related to development and identified projects 1-1 and related costs are apportioned for maintenance and improvement of existing service separately from projects and costs related to new development. Where projects address both current needs and development costs are apportioned accordingly. 1.2. Outline of Scope Development of this comprehensive master plan for the City Corpus Christi Wastewater System was accomplished through a series of tasks as outlined below: 1.2.1, Land Use Assumptions Update Updated Land Use Assumptions (LUAs) are necessary to accurately assess current and future wastewater system demand and infrastructure needs. Comprehensive master plans, Area Development Plans, platting and building permit history, along with adopted current and future Land Uses from the City were reviewed to provide updated LUAs. Land use assumptions are based on past and present development patterns, current and projected land use, current and projected zoning, projected population growth and patterns, and input from city Staff and the community. 1.2.2. Collect and Review of Existing Data Data and documents reviewed in conjunction with the development of this Master Plan include, but are not limited to: • City of Corpus Christi wastewater network GIS files. • City of Corpus Christi SewerGEMS models provided for evaluation of current and future wastewater flows. • Wastewater flow monitoring and rainfall data. • Infiltration/ Inflow (1/1) study results. • Topographic mapping for the City and Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). • Wastewater flow records (Monitoring,Wastewater Treatment Plant(WWTP)flows,TCEQ special Use Permit flows). • Wastewater collection system plans (as-built drawings, record drawings, construction plans), including plans for currently proposed projects. • Lift station record drawings. • Collection system operation and maintenance (O&M) records. 1-2 • Available Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection data. • Existing design standards and operation procedures. • Sanitary Sewer Overflow(SSO) records. 1.2.3. Wastewater Mapping System Update Existing information was used to update wastewater system maps, GIS data, and the SewerGEMS Model to at least 2019 conditions.This process included: • Using available wastewater system design plans to update mapping and the associated database. • Comparison of manhole (MH) and line elevations with updated topography. • Update of MH elevations and inverts,where information was available from previous studies, record documentation, and maintenance and repair records. 1.2.4, Flow and Usage Development Data from this City provided SewerGEMS model and water usage data, and existing wastewater system data were used to develop initial wastewater flow factors.The flow factors were then compared with recorded wastewater treatment plant flows and adjusted to provide consistent assumptions across the components of the wastewater system. Lift station sewershed areas Flow factors were also assumed to include a reasonable assessment of the inflow and infiltration component. 1.2.5. Wastewater System Modeling Existing wastewater flow data from the Wastewater Treatment Plants, available information and records, and recent study and investigation results were used in conjunction with the hydraulic model to evaluate current, ten-year, and ultimate predicted flow rates. Ultimate flows are defined for this plan as the predicted flows that would result from every lot identified on the Future Land Use map being developed. 1.2.6. Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation There are currently six wastewater treatment plants in the City wastewater system including Allison, Broadway, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, Oso, and Whitecap. Current condition and capacity of each WWTP was assessed.The City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan, conducted by Stantec 1-3 and LNV in 2016,which projected flows through 2045 was used as the initial basis for this assessment. Other reports, master plans, permits and third-party evaluations were also reviewed. Previous recommendations that have been implemented and remining recommendations from the previous evaluations were identified. Projected flows from the 2016 report were compared to the those developed from the collection system modeling, and the information used to assess the capacity of the existing WWTPs to treat current, 5-year, and ten-year projected flows. Recommendations for improvements were identified and included in the proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 1,2.7. Review and Assess Wastewater Design Criteria Existing design standards and requirements were reviewed and compared to accepted standards used in similar areas and to applicable state and federal requirements including TCEQ standard as stated in Texas Administrative Code Section 30, Part 1, Chapters 217 and 317. Existing policies and standards were also compared to the current best management practices including Capacity, Management, Operations, and Maintenance (CMOM) and common asset management programs. Recommendations from this review are included herein. 1.2.8. Capital Improvement and Master Plan development. The current Capital Improvement Plan was reviewed with the information developed under the previous tasks. Projects that were included in this review are: • Citywide Collection System Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity Program • Citywide Lift Station Repair • Citywide Wastewater Lift Station Alternate Power Supply • Wastewater Treatment Plants and Lift Station supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) Improvements • Allison WWTP Lift Station Upgrade and Process Improvements • Greenwood WWTP Flood Mitigation • Greenwood WWTP Electrical Improvements to Ultraviolet(UV) System • Greenwood WWTP Process Upgrades • Greenwood Flow Diversion to New Broadway WWTP • McBride Force Main and Lift Station • Broadway WWTP Rehabilitation • Oso Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) Headworks and Lift Station • Oso WRP Process Upgrade and BPC Facility Decommission 1-4 • Williams Lift Station Force Main (Line A) • Laguna Madre Plant Rehabilitation • Laguna Shores Road Force Main Replacement • Whitecap Odor Control, Process and Bulkhead Improvements • Whitecap WWTP Improvements These projects and associated projected costs were reviewed to assess the overall impact to the wastewater system and to provide an apportionment of maintenance and service improvement related costs separately from development related costs. New projects were identified and developed to meet projected wastewater maintenance and service needs for the 10-year horizon and ultimate buildout conditions. Probable costs for identified projects were developed using historic costs data from recent projects in the city, information provided by local construction contractors, and accepted costs estimating methods. This Master Plan was then developed by compiling the information, data, analysis, and results from the various tasks as described. 1.3. Capital Improvement Advisory Council In accordance with Chapter 395,the City established a Capital Improvement Advisory Council (CIAC) that was tasked with overseeing and guiding the development of the Master Plan and the associated Capital Improvement Program. Composition of the CIAC is fifteen members appointed by the City council of which at least six members represent the real estate, development, or building industry. AS noted by the City's description of the CIAC: "The committee shall serve in an advisory capacity; advise and assist the City Council in adopting land use assumptions; review the capital improvements plan, land use assumptions and impact fees, and file written comments in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; monitor and evaluate the implementation of the capital improvements plan; file semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee; and advise the City Council of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee." 1-5 Members of CIAC were regularly briefed on the development of the Master Plan, provided information as it was developed, and provided input and recommendations. 1-6 2. WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM A general description of the wastewater collection and treatment assets is provided as a baseline for planning and proposed development. As maintenance, modification, upgrades, and new development are ongoing activities, conditions as described in this section are general in nature and will change with time. 2.1. Wastewater Assets Wastewater services are provided within the City Limits of Corpus Christi and cover approximately 160 square miles (103,000 acres) as shown in Exhibit 1. The wastewater service area is bounded on the north by Corpus Christi Bay, Nueces Bay, and the Nueces River to the east the city extends across the Flour Bluff peninsula and onto Padre and Mustang islands. Padre and Mustang Islands, generally the eastern extent of the service area, are part of the coastal island system on the Texas coast and the wastewater system on one of these islands is generally bonded to the north by the City of Port Aransas and on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the west by Corpus Christi Bay and the Laguna Madre, and to the south by the Padre Island National Seashore. Wastewater on the islands is routed to and treated at the Whitecap WWTP.The Flour Bluff Area (Serviced by the Laguna Madre WWTP is a peninsula that lies between the Laguna Madre and Oso Bay. Oso creek is a major stream drainage the runs along the southwest side of the current City limits. Development is occurring south and west of Oso Creek and wastewater systems are being extended into these areas.To the west and northwest, the wastewater system is limited only by the current state of development and the limits of the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Topographic relief in the area is limited with elevations ranging from sea level at the Gulf of Mexico, Oso Bay, Corpus Christi Bay, and Laguna Madre to approximately 130 feet above sea level in the northwest (Allison) area. With a few exceptions such as the bluff in the downtown area, elevation changes are gradual and there are large areas where the topography is level. Elevation and limited topographic relief present significant constraints on wastewater system development limiting the length of gravity collection pipes that can effectively be implemented. 2-1 2.1.1. Wastewater treatment plants. Wastewater is collected and treated at six Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) located throughout the city. Locations and areas served by each treatment plant are shown on Exhibit 2 and current capacity information is provided in the Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Water Treatment Plants Treatment Plant Construction Last Modified Average Flow Peak Flow Capacity(MGD) Capacity(MGD) Allison 1966 1984 5 15 Broadway 1938 2016 8 20 Greenwood 1957 1980 8 24 Laguna Madre 1971 2022 3 9 Oso 1941 2018 16.2 98 Whitecap 1974 2018 2.5 7.5 Repair and upgrade work is currently planned or underway at each WWTP. An evaluation of current capacity and condition, future treatment flows, along with maintenance and capacity needs has been completed by Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. (LAN) in support of this Master Plan. Information on the WWTPs is taken from that study and the document titled "Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation" is included as Appendix A. Each WWTP receives flow from a network of Lift Stations, force mains, and gravity flow pipe within a basin defined by topography, existing development, and the extent of the wastewater system associated with an individual lift station.The area feeding a WWTP is denoted as a sewershed. Each of the six seweresheds in the City are designated as service areas for the purpose of developing maintenance, upgrade, repair and expansion projects and associated costs for the wastewater system. 2.1.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains The low overall elevation of the City and the flat topography requires a significant number of lift stations and associated force mains to move wastewater flows to the WWTPs. The City currently has 106 lift stations, including those located at each WWTP, and over 100 miles of force mains. Each service area is subdivided into sub-basins to identify the gravity lines that flow to each Lifts station. Information on the current size and capacity of the lift stations are provided in Appendix B. Lift stations and the associated 2-2 sub-basins for each Service Area are shown on Exhibit 3 through Exhibit 8. Lift stations at each WWTP are part of the WWTP evaluations. 2.1.3. Gravity collection system Gravity collection of wastewaters is limited by the level topography and the practical depth of installation for gravity flow pipe.The City operates and maintains approximately 1,195 miles of gravity sewer lines with over 62,630 manholes in the system. Pipe diameters in the current system range from 2-inches to 60-inches. Around 78 percent of the gravity lines are 8-inches or less in diameter with 17 percent in the 10-to 18-inch range and the remaining 5 percent are 24-inches in diameter or larger. 2.2. Consent Decree Aging infrastructure and increasing demands on the wastewater system resulted in a substantial number of Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) during rain events. In 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) informed that City of Corpus Christi that the SSOs violated the Clean Water Act and the significant repairs and upgrades to the Wastewater system were required. After a decade of negotiations, a 15-Year Consent Decree was agreed to by the City of Corpus Christi, the EPA, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ).The agreement was executed in January of 2021. Under the terms of this agreement,the City will, over the 15-year term of the agreement, inspect, clean and repair wastewater pipes, manholes, and force mains, and upgrade lift stations and wastewater treatment plants to improve capacity and overall system performance to limit the potential for SSOs and to improve overall operations of the wastewater system. Requirements of the consent decree were reviewed and incorporated in this master plan so that repairs, upgrades, modification, and expansion of wastewater assets under the master plan are consistent with, and supportive of, compliance with the Consent Decree. Requirements of the Consent Decree will prevail in the event of any discrepancy. Modeling of the wastewater system was also a requirement of the consent decree.The SewerGEMS Hydraulic model used in the development of this master plan was developed, calibrated, and approved by the EPA for use in addressing the requirement of the Consent Decree. 2-3 3. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Demand on public infrastructure is a function of the population,where that population lives and works, and how the land within the service area of the public system is used. Evaluation of the future demands on the Wastewater System related to development requires a reasonable assessment of the increase in population,where and how new development occurs, and changes in land use and population density. Taken together these parameters are referred to as Land Use Assumptions (LUAs). Projections for growth in employees and households are regularly conducted by the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Current projections were used as an initial point in the development of Land Use Assumptions and evaluating future demands on the wastewater system. 3.1. Area Development Plans To improve City-wide planning, zoning, and land use assumptions the City Planning Department has divided the city into nine planning areas (Bayside, Corpus Christi Airport, Downtown, Flour Bluff, London, Northwest, Padre/Mustang Island, Southside, and Westside) and has developed planning documents for each area.These Area Development Plans (ADPs) are based on current and projected land usage and on projected needs based on the character, land use, population, and anticipated development of the individual areas. Projections for each area can be combined to provide overall City- wide Land Use Assumptions. In addition to the ADPs currently in place, a tenth planning area located between the Northwest ADP, the City of Robstown,Texas, and west of Interstate 69 has been identified and used in the master plan development.This tenth planning area is referred to as the Calallen Planning Development Area. Exhibit 9 shows the PDAs used in developing the land use assumptions. Both the London and Calallen planning areas extend into the City's ETJ outside of the City Limits. Development in these areas is occurring and is expected to continue to occur with related annexation of the land and extension of City services. Master planning for extension of wastewater services in these areas is provided like planning within the city limits. Additional development of land in the ETJ is expected to follow the growth patterns of the adjacent ADP and is assumed to follow the established land use patterns. Significant portions of the ETJ are located north of Corpus Christi Bay and Nueces Bay (See Exhibit 10). 3-1 There are no City owned services in these areas and development is not expected to be significant within the planning horizons of this Master Plan. Planning efforts have not been included for areas of the ETJ where costs to extend wastewater services are high and significant development is not expected to occur for an extended period. 3.2. Projected Growth Rate Growth projections are developed and updated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Data from the MPO projections was initially used to calculate a predicted annual growth rate based on increase in households and the projected increase in employees from 2021 to 2031. Project growth rates were calculated using the following equation. 1 /2031 households/employees\number of years Percent Annual Growth = l /I — 1 100 2021 households/emplyees As an example, in the Downtown ADP, the number of current households is 3,794. In 2031, it is projected that the number of households in this ADP may be 4,919.This is a difference of 1,124 and correlates to a 2.6 percent growth per year in households. A similar methodology was used for projected increases in employees. Projected annual growth based on households and employees are shown in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2. Table 3-1 Projected Annual Growth by households ADP 2021 2031 2031 Less 2021 Annual Growth Households Households in households Bayside 31,508 32,478 970 0.3% Calallen 1,310 2,201 891 5.3% CC Airport 1,582 2,228 646 3.5% Downtown 3,794 4,919 1,125 2.6% Flour Bluff 8,006 8,573 567 0.7% London 1,100 1,720 620 4.6% Northwest 12,152 15,194 3,042 2.3% Padre/Mustang Island 5,987 7,295 1,308 2.0% Southside 41,601 47,130 5,529 1.3% Westside 18,533 19,978 1,445 0.8% Total 125,573 141,716 16,143 1.2% 3-2 Table 3-2 Projected Annual Growth by Employees 2021 031 Annual ees ADP Employees Employees yees lo 2031 Less 2021 Growth in p y Employees Bayside 25,887 26,342 455 0.2% Calallen 3,502 4,093 591 1.6% CC Airport 8,927 10,755 1,828 1.9% Downtown 17,328 17,450 122 0.1% Flour Bluff 11,725 12,077 352 0.3% London 423 732 309 5.6% Northwest 11,536 13,307 1,771 1.4% Padre/Mustang Island 2,666 3,431 765 2.6% Southside 26,898 30,226 3,328 1.2% Westside 31,253 33,767 2,514 0.8% Total 140,145 152,180 12,035 0.8% According to the US Census Bureau, the City of Corpus Christi had an annual growth rate of 0.4 percent from 2010 to 2020.The data from the MPO projections shows a more robust growth rate is anticipated over the next ten-year period. City records of lots added in each ADP from January 1, 2020, to January 25, 2022,were then used to generate an annual growth rate for the last two years.The MPO baseline number for 2021 households was used in conjunction with the lots added data from the city using the same formula to generate an annual growth rate based on the lot added information.The growth rate from lots added is compared to the MPO Households growth rate in Table 3-3. Table 3-3 MPO Annual Growth Rate vs.Annual Growth Rate by Lot Additioins MPO Annual MPO Annual Average Annual Lot ADP Residential Units Annual Lot Addition Added Growth Rate Addition Growth Rate Bayside 97 0.3% 60 0.2% Calallen 80 5.3% 24 1.8% CC Airport 65 4.1% 0 0.0% Downtown 112 3.0% 5 0.5% Flour Bluff 57 0.7% 112 1.4% London 288 4.6% 225 4.5% Northwest 304 2.5% 71 0.6% Padre/Mustang Island 131 2.2% 36 0.6% Southside 553 1.3% 421 1.0% Westside 145 0.8% 70 0.4% Total 1,832 1.3% 1024 0.8% 3-3 In addition, the City provided growth rate information from previous time periods for six of the ADPs, which was included in the overall evaluation of growth rates. Historic growth rate and the associated period are provided in Table 3-4. Table 3-4 Historic Growth Rate by ADP ADP Time Period Growth Trend Bayside 2010-2021 0.15% Calallen No Data CC Airport No Data Downtown No Data Flour Bluff 2010-2019 0.67% London 2000-2018 7.2% Northwest No Data Padre/Mustang Island 2000-2019 2.48% Southside 2000-2018 2.04% Westside 2000-2019 0.36% This information was considered along with the other data discussed to develop a baseline and a reasonable prediction of projected growth. Growth trends were discussed with City Staff and the CIAC, who provided input from the builder, developer, engineering, business, and general citizen communities. Growth rates were adjusted based on the input from the CIC and based on the reviews and the discussions noted, a growth rate for each ADP was selected with the following rational: • Bayside is judged to have minimal growth and there is no current indication this growth rate may increase in the ten-year planning period. A growth rate of 0.2 percent is used. • Conditions and growth in Calallen are like those in the Northwest ADP and the same growth rate of 1.5 percent is used. • Based on discussions with the CIAC, residential development in the CC Airport ADP may not occur at an appreciable rate during the planning horizon of this Master Plan and no growth (0.0 percent) is used. • The Downtown rates have a broad range; however, there is an ongoing effort to encourage "redevelopment" in the downtown areas, necessitating consideration of a higher growth rate. A rate of 2.0 percent is used. • In the Flour Bluff area, the MPO and City growth rate are similar, but there is an increase in growth occurring recently based on the lot added information.This observation is consistent with recent development activity in the area. A rate of 1.0 percent is used for this area. 3-4 • For the London area there is currently strong interest in development,the past observed growth rate as identified by the City is 7.2 percent. After discussions and review with the CIAC, an annual growth rate of 10.6 percent has been applied in this area. • The Northwest area has a significant range of available data. An average growth rate between the MPO household data and the lot addition data of 1.5 percent is used. • In the Padre/Mustang Island ADP, the MPO growth rate and the City's growth trend are consistent.The growth rate in lot count may be minimal due to the type of growth (i.e., planned use developments). A growth rate of 2.4 percent is used. • The Southside area has experienced a higher rate identified by City data than either the MPO or the added lot count data. Interest in development in this area is strong and a conservative 2.0 percent growth rate has been selected. • The Westside lot count rate and growth trend identified by the City are consistent. A growth rate of 0.4 percent was selected for the Westside. The growth rates developed and considered and the selected growth rates for use as the basis of this Master Plan are shown in Table 3-5. Table 3-5 Growth Rates Reviewed and Selected Annual Annual Annual Lot Historic Selected ADP Growth in Growth in Addition Growth Growth Rate Employees households Growth Rate Rate Bayside 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.15% 0.2% Calallen 1.6% 5.3% 1.8% 1.5% CC Airport 1.9% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% Downtown 0.1% 2.6% 0.5% 2.0% Flour Bluff 0.3% 0.7% 1.4% 0.67% 1.0% London 5.6% 4.6% 4.6% 7.2%° 10.6% Northwest 1.4% 2.3% 0.6% 1.5% Padre/Mustang Island 2.6% 2.0% 0.6% 2.48% 2.4% Southside 1.2% 1.3% 1.0% 2.04% 2.0% Westside 0.8% 0.8% 0.4% 0.36% 0.4% Total 0.9% 1.3% 1.8% 1.5% For commercial development, the growth rates taken from the MPO data are used.Table 3-6 provides the 2021 and 2031 data for residential and commercial growth used for evaluating future wastewater demands and proposed Projects to meet current and future needs. 3-5 Table 3-6 Projected 10-Year Commercial and Residental Growth by ADP ADP 2021 2031 2021 2031 Households Households Employees Employees Bayside 31,508 32,144 25,887 26,342 Calallen 13,310 1,520 3,502 4,093 CC Airport 1,585 1,582 8,927 10,755 Downtown 3,794 4,625 17,328 17,450 Flour Bluff 8,006 8,844 11,725 12,077 London 11100 3,000 423 732 Northwest 12,152 14,103 11,536 13,307 Padre/Mustang Island 5,987 7,589 2,666 3,431 Southside 41,601 50,711 26,898 30,226 Westside 18,533 19,288 31,253 33,767 Total 129,485 147,886 142,214 155,164 3.3. Land Use With the annual growth rate for the ADPs selected, the next step is to identify where the anticipated growth may occur to facilitate planning for future wastewater system expansion. Vacant land that could develop withing the planning horizon of the master plan is assessed by comparing the anticipated growth with current land use density and use. For example, residential growth can be assessed in ADPs by determining the overall density and then using the number of projected new households to calculate how much undeveloped land may be impacted by the predicted development. As an example,for residential development,there are 8,006 residences in the Flower Bluff ADP in 2021, the current density across residential land use types is three units per gross acre.The predicted growth by 2031 in households is 567, which equates to 189 acres of currently undeveloped or agricultural land being developed into some type of residential use. Similar evaluations have been conducted in each ADP. Current land use maps and information from ADPs were used to identify currently vacant and agricultural areas within the ADPs and future land use mapping based on current land use zoning and previous master planning efforts have been developed by the City to facilitate practical and efficient 3-6 development.The existing and future land use maps were overlayed to identify currently vacant and agricultural land that could be developed, and what the anticipated land use for the area would be. Maps have been prepared for the ADPs identifying currently undeveloped land.The base color of the vacant lands correlate to the zoned land use (see map legends) and the outline color for parcels indicates whether the current land use is vacant (orange outline) or agricultural (green outline). Due to their size,this information is maintained in a shapefile provided to the City. New lot information provided by the City was then reviewed to assess where potential growth would occur and to identify overall growth patterns. For a new development outside of the City limits to have wastewater services, the land must be annexed, and the wastewater collection system extended, so growth outside of the City is assumed to occur adjacent to existing development within the City Limit or to follow patterns like current development and then to move outward into the ETJ. Other development factors, such as properties within the Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) around military air installation and Accident Potential Zones (APZ) around the Corpus Christin international Airport. Such zoning and use restrictions were assumed to delay development and limit the land use density in the associated areas. For developing ten-year projections, development in areas with land use restrictions was assumed to remain stagnate and no contributions were included for the ten-year flows. It should also be noted that areas within defined 100-year flood zones is anticipated to develop eventually. Based on conversations with the CIAC, development in these areas would be larger lots and wastewater system needs will be minimal. 3-7 4. WASTEWATER FLOWS 4.1. Master Plan methodology Land use assumptions are used to develop a general prediction of where growth will occur, both in residential and commercial/ industrial areas, how fast that growth will occur, and the impact predicted growth patterns will have on the wastewater collection and treatment system. General guidelines have been developed and presented for use in planning and guiding future expansion of the wastewater system.These guidelines are not intended to be prescriptive as to exact location and specific route of future improvements while providing guidance on flows that can be anticipated and how to manage increased flows due to development. 4,1,1. Wastewater Flows Wastewater in the Corpus Christi Wastewater System is derived from residential, commercial, and industrial use of water.Water entering the Wastewater system from outside sources must also be considered. Inflow and infiltration (1/1) is water that enters the system through aged and damaged infrastructure and flows to, and through WWTPs and can significantly impact the capacity of WWTPs and collection systems. Evaluation of 1/1 consist of dry weather infiltration and rainfall derived inflow and infiltration (RDI I). Methodology for addressing flow sources for this master plan are discussed below. 4.1.2, Domestic Wastewater Residential and commercial wastewater contributions are considered as domestic wastewater in the evaluation of current and anticipated flows. Flows from residential and commercial sources are similar in composition. In evaluating future flows and infrastructure needs, growth in the commercial and residential sectors is considered separately in evaluating volume increases. 4.1.3, Industrial Wastewater Industrial sources can produce large volumes of wastewater with more complex composition that may require additional treatment processes or that may tax existing treatment processes reducing the available capacity of the treatment system. Industrial sources of wastewater are currently accepted and treated within the wastewater treatment system; however,these flows are part of the current baseflow and have been included with the domestic wastewater in evaluating current conditions. At the time this plan was prepared, there were potential large volume user developments; however,the probability of these developments being realized was considered low. Should industrial development occur that has 4-1 the potential to significantly impact the flow and/or treatment capacity of the associated WWTP, those impacts will need to be assessed and the timeline of upgrades, process improvements, or capacity expansion adjusted as necessary to address the demand. 4.1.4, Inflow and Infiltration Low ground elevations, level topography, proximity to the ocean, bays, rivers and streams, and the depth of the wastewater collection lines places a significant amount of collection piping below groundwater levels. Groundwater can infiltrate wastewater systems through open pipe joints, damaged pipe and manholes, leaky lateral connections, and other causes related to aging or misuse of the system. Older infrastructure also lacks the advantages of modern materials and updated construction methods intended to reduce infiltration. Dry weather infiltration is a function of ground water elevation and will fluctuate seasonally and annually depending on rainfall amounts and weather patterns in general. Lack of topographic relief, aging and inefficient storm water drainage systems, and the nature of rainstorms in the area also make the wastewater system vulnerable to additional infiltration during rain events and to direct inflow of stormwater into the system through damaged cleanouts and manholes, manhole covers, and undocumented storm drain connections to the wastewater system. Discharge of stormwater into the wastewater system is prohibited by city codes and ordnances; however, such connections often exist and may be a significant source of inflow. Evaluation and understanding of the 1/1 are important for future planning. A reasonable estimate of the amount of 1/1 that will enter a system over time impacts the sizing of pipes, the capacity of lifts stations and the capacity and treatment requirements at WWTPs. Infiltration and inflow have been a significant factor in past SSOs, and a significant effort has been initiated, and is ongoing, to address 1/1 through replacing aged pipes and manholes, maintaining, and upgrading lift stations, and reducing the potential for inflow from areas prone to highwater during storm events.The current efforts to respond to the Consent Order include reducing 1/1 in the overall wastewater system by 35 percent. New infrastructure installed to support development or to replace existing infrastructure will be less susceptible to 1/1; however, as systems age,the potential for 1/1 will increase. Sizing of improvements recommended herein assume that the 35 percent reduction goal will be achieved, and an allowance has been included for some 1/1 as systems age. 4-2 4.2. Hydraulic Model As part of the Consent Order response, the City developed and calibrated a hydraulic model using the SewerGEMS platform to evaluate capacity restraints in the system that could be contributory to SSOs. The model is capable of estimating flows with or without 1/1 and separating dry weather infiltration from RDI1. Modeling for this Master Plan was completed using the SewerGEMS hydraulic model as provided by the City. Development of baseline current flows and predicted future flows started with an assessment of the SewerGEMS model. Available information from recent inspections, repairs, upgrades, and expansions were used to update the model; however, flows in the model are representative of 2019 conditions. Meter data, billing records,water use records and other data were used to compare and adjust model results with observed and documented flows.There were areas of the model where the baseline data provided inconsistent results and the available information was not sufficient to address the inconsistencies. Interpretation and interpolation were necessary in some areas to provide consistent planning across the wastewater system. 4.3. Current Flows Wastewater flows can be derived from potable water demands as a consistent amount of provided water returns to the WWTPs along with 1/1 flows. Water billing and use records were evaluated and compared to treatment records from the WWTPs to establish a water recovery rate, i.e., amount of water used that enters the system as wastewater.The results are presented in Table 4-1, Water Recovery Rates. Table 4-1 Water Recovery Rates ADP Water Use Treatment Flow Percent (MGD) (MGD) Recovery CC Airport 1,133,839 660,000 58.2% Downtown 2,343,531 1,450,000 61.9% Flour Bluff 2,658,608 2,350,000 88.4% Bayside 8,598,299 5,520,000 64.2% Northwest 3,459,051 2,860,000 82.7% Padre/Mustang Island 1,426,415 920,000 64.5% Southside 10,682,315 8,450,000 79.1% Westside 6,532,813 3,960,000 60.6% Total 36,834,871 26,170,000 71.0% 4-3 A wide range of variation in recovery between ADPs is evident. With ten ADPs and six WWTPs some variation in the locations of recorded water demand and wastewater treatment may exist, and variations in the amount of the 1/1 in each ADP may also contribute to the variation. Some discrepancies within the billing, flow monitoring, or other data may also contribute to the variations. In addition, aging systems, both water and wastewater, may contribute to losses or gains in volume. However,when the recovery rate over the full system is considered,there is a 71 percent water recovery, which is consistent with an industry accepted average rate of 70 percent. Using the available information,water demand for the city is estimated as 240 gallons per day (GPD) for each residential unit and 170 Gallons per day per employee. A standard recover rate of 70 percent is used in developing future wastewater flows. 4.3.1. Infiltration and Inflow An understanding of the impact of 1/1 in the system was estimated by comparing several years of meter data to measured flow data from each of the WWTPs.The infiltration estimate was then used to model current system flows and to provide dry weather infiltration modeling in the SewerGEMS model. The impact of 1/1 was evaluated by comparing modeled base flows at the WWTPs with the dry weather domestic wastewater loads from the SewerGEMS model.Table 4-2 provides a comparison of flows at the WWTPs and the modeled flow without 1/1. Table 4-2. 1/1 Evalauation Modeled Modeled Flow 1/1 Contribution Percent of Base WWTP WWTP Flow Without 1/I (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) Flow Allison 2,275 2,197 78 3.4% Broadway 2,264 2,182 82 3.6% Greenwood 4,058 2,985 1,073 26.4% Laguna Madre 1,556 1,320 236 15.2% Oso 9,204 7,997 1,207 13.1% Whitecap 983 662 321 32.7% Total 20,340 17,343 2,997 14.3% 4-4 Significant impacts from 1/1 are notable in the Greenwood and Whitecap basins.Also of note is that the flows in the Model at the WWTPs do not fully correlate with the 2021 observed flow data. As noted,the hydraulic mode was not fully updated to current conditions as part of this study and annual variations around a general mean flow is common for WWTP flows. For the purposes of this planning effort, the model data is used to evaluate flow contribution from 1/1 and overall impacts to the system. System capacities and future flows are developed using the observed 2021 flows as base line and the model used to predict future flow requirements. 4.4. Future Flows Future flows were developed and evaluated for a ten-year planning horizon and an ultimate build-out condition. By looking at each parcel on the land use map and assigning a flow to the parcel based on the anticipated land use, flows can be assigned to individual lift station basins and then to the associated WWTP and routed through hydraulic model for the collection system pipe network. For the ultimate flow condition, the exercise is academic as each parcel can be assigned a flow based on the anticipated land use, the flow can then be allocated to the appropriate lift station sub-basin and the WWTP basin. For undeveloped areas without an existing collection system,the topography of the area was used as a general guide as to the probable direction of flow from each parcel and the efficient locations for trunk lines and new lift stations. Flows were then allocated to the appropriate WWTP by the defined service areas. Smaller collection lines are not shown to minimize undue influence or restriction on designs.The general principles of efficient design and development should be followed for new development to provide adequate pipe sizes for proposed development and for future development that could occur upstream. Changes in the locations of the future trunk lines and lift stations are acceptable to accommodate development requirements. For ten-year flows, the process is similar; however, since not all the land is developed, there is some variability in flows based on where development actually occurs.The Area Development Plans provide some guidance as to anticipated growth patterns, and these general patterns were used in developing the ten-year flows. Properties with existing large lot development using on-site sanitary sewer systems, within an AICUZ, APZ or with other restrictions on development were assumed to not develop during the ten year horizon. Information provided by the CIAC on areas with low potential for development in the near term was also taken into consideration in developing ten-year flow demands. 4-5 With ten ADPS used to evaluate potential growth and development and six wastewater service areas there is not a direct correlation in the boundaries. While growth is evaluated for each ADP, future wastewater flows are associated with each WWTP. Predicted growth rates vary between ADPS, and wastewater service areas overlap ADPS. Future flows were developed by evaluating flows based on the ADP growth at each lot within the Service Areas to arrive at predicted 10-year, and ultimate buildout flows for the service areas. By applying the growth rate determined for each ADP and land use category to lots and current flows within a service area, flows can be predicted for each parcel. Summing these flows provides a corresponding flow for the service area. As an example, the Broadway WWTP serves parcels in the Bayside, Downtown, and Westside ADPS. Table 4-3 shows how growth rates are applied to arrive at a predicted 10-year flow at WWTP. Table 4-3 Projected 10-Year Flows for Broadway WWTP ADP Flow at Current Flow per ADP Growth Predicted 10- ADP Land Use the Broadway Land use Category Rate(%) Year Flow WWTP(%) (GPM) (GPM) Commercial 14.3 229 0.2 234 Bayside Residential 25.3 310 0.2 316 Commercial 56.5 908 0.1 917 Downtown Residential 24.5 300 2.0 366 Westside Commercial 29.3 470 0.8 509 Residential 50.2 614 0.4 639 Broadway WWTP Commercial 1608 1660 Subtotals Residential 1224 1321 Total 2832 2982 Applying this procedure to each service area provides the projected ten-year flow for each service are shown in Table 4-4. Table 4-4 Current and 10-Year Flows Current WWTP Predicted 10-year Flow Difference WWTP Flows(gpm) (gpm) (gpm) Percent Change Allison 2,275 2,753 478 21.0 Broadway 2,832 2,982 150 5.3 Greenwood 4,058 4,814 330 18.6 Laguna Madre 1,556 1,886 1,1 21.2 Oso 9,204 10,498 1,294 14.1 4-6 Current WWTP Predicted 10-year Flow Difference WWTP Flows(gpm) (gpm) (gpm) Percent Change Whitecap 983 1,177 194 19.7 Total 20,908 24,110 3,202 15.3 4.4,1. Ultimate Flows Ultimate buildout for the purpose of this plan is defined as that point where each parcel of land identified on the City's Future Land Use Map is developed and is being used for the planned. By looking at each parcel on the land use map and assigning a flow to the parcel based on the anticipated land use, flows can be assigned to individual lift station basins and then to the associated WWTP for the Ultimate conditions.Table 4-5 provides the current flow used as a basis for developing future flows, the predicted 10-year flow and the ultimate flow condition. Table 4-5 Predicted Flows by Service Area Current WWTP 10-Year Predicted Ultimate Predicted WWTP Flows(GPM) Additional 10-year Additional Ultimate Flows(GPM) Flow(GPM) Flows(GPM) Flows(GPM) Allison 2,275 478 2,753 1,584 4,337 Broadway 2,832 150 2,982 568 3,550 Greenwood 4,058 330 4,814 2,398 7,212 Laguna Madre 11556 1,1 1,886 662 2,548 Oso 9,204 1,294 10,498 627 11,125 Whitecap 983 194 1,177 1545 2,722 Total 20,908 3,202 24,110 7,384 31,494 The predicted flows included 1/1 contributions based on the City achieving the 35 percent reduction in accordance with the Consent Order goals, new infrastructure being well constructed and maintained and the overall maintenance of the system keeping pace with aging of the system to keep the 1/1 levels constant or decreasing. 4-7 5. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION Each service area was further divided into sub-sewer basins according to the areas contributing to each left station. Existing wastewater assets were first evaluated for current conditions and capacity to identify projects that are currently needed to provide and maintain adequate service under existing conditions. Future flow conditions were then applied to the system to evaluate infrastructure needs for the ten-year and ultimate flow conditions. Planning for the ultimate buildout provides an understanding of the overall system needs against which shorter term planning can be evaluated to provide overall efficiency and economy. For example, if a new collection pipe or new lift station is required to meet ten-year development needs, the ultimate condition should be taken into account to determine if a larger pipe should be installed to address long term demand, or the lift station should be designed to allow for expansion to accommodate long term needs. An extensive inspection and condition assessment program has been initiated by the City and is congoing. Available data from the City assessments were made available for use in evaluation and recommendations of upgrades, additions, and new construction of wastewater assets. Additional condition assessments were not within the scope of this Master Plan study. 5.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants A detailed analysis of the six existing WWTPs is provided in Appendix A, a summary of that information is presented here. Several capital improvement projects are currently planned or underway and many of the WWTPs and the capacity data presented is based on the assumption that those projects have or will be completed.Table 2-1Table 5-1provides the current and anticipated Average Daily flows as compared to the current average daily capacity. Table 5-1 WWTP Current and Projected Flows Current Current Projected 2031 Projected Treatment Plant Average Flow Average Daily Average Daily Ultimate Capacity(MGD) Flow(MGD) Flow(MGD) Average Daily Flow(MGD) Allison 5.0 3.28 3.96 6.25 Broadway 8.0 4.08 4.29 5.11 Greenwood 12.0 5.84 6.93 10.39 Laguna Madre 3.0 2.24 2.72 3.67 5-1 Current Current Projected 2031 Projected Treatment Plant Average Flow Average Daily Average Daily Ultimate Capacity(MGD) Flow(MGD) Flow(MGD) Average Daily Flow(MGD) OSO 18.0 13.25 15.12 16.02 Whitecap 2.5 1.42 1.69 3.92 With completion of projects currently planned or underway at the six WWTPs, all six plants currently have sufficient capacity for current and the projected ten-year growth.Three plants,Allison, Laguna Madre, and Whitecap will require expansion to add additional capacity to address the ultimate build-out condition. Under regulations of the TCEQ(Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Section 305.126(a), expansion planning must be initiated by a municipality when the average daily flow reaches 75 percent of the existing plant capacity. Evaluation of the WWTPs includes capacity need and planning needs based on the TCEQ rule. Table 5-2 provide a comparison of 75 percent capacity flow and the approximate time frame when expansion planning would need to be initiated and the approximate time frame when expansion would need to be completed (WWTP flow reaches 100 percent of current capacity), based on the projected growth used herein. Table 5-2 Expansion Planning Timing Current 75%of Current Year 75% Year 100 Treatment Average Flow Years to 75% Years to 100 Average Flow Capacity Capacity o Capacity Capacity Plant Capacity Capacity Reached Reached (MGD) (MGD) Allison 5.0 3.75 7.8 2029 20.9 2042 Broadway 8.0 6.00 26.6 2048 46.0 2067 Greenwood 12.0 9.00 29.2 2050 56.9 2078 Laguna Madre 3.0 2.25 4.4 2025 13.3 2034 OSO 18.0 13.5 5.7 2027 17.7 2039 Whitecap 2.5 1.88 17.6 2039 42.4 2063 Completion of current and planned projects to increase capacity at the Greenwood and Oso WWTPS is assumed in the timelines presented. 5-2 Three of the WWTPs would require expansion planning to start within the ten-year planning horizon, Allison, Laguna Madre, and Oso. Land is available for expansion of the WWTPs except for the Oso plant. Land around the Oso WWTP is developed, and expansion potential is limited. Based on the current and future land use projections used for this Master Plan, the capacity improvements currently underway or planned at the OSO plant will be sufficient to manage the predicted ultimate flows. Broadway and Greenwood WWTP will also have sufficient capacity for the ultimate buildout condition with the currently planned improvements. The Oso plant will exceed 75 percent of the current capacity within the ten-year planning period and should expansion of capacity be necessary to meet TCEQ requirements,this planning effort may require plans to divert flows from the Oso Service Area to the Greenwood WWTP or to consider process improvements to provide the required capacity. Infrastructure is currently in place to allow for flow diversion from the Oso Service Area to the Greenwood WWTP. Projected future flows from the London Area ADP are included in the projected Greenwood WWTP data. As development beyond the current land use plan could occur in the London area, the capacity and future flows for the Greenwood plant should be re-evaluated in the 5 to 10 year time frame. 5.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains Lift station pump capacity,wet well volume, and force main capacity were evaluated for current, ten- year, and ultimate flow conditions to determine current adequacy and upgrades necessary to address future flows.Where force main flow velocities exceeded six feet per second (FPS), replacement with a larger pipe size is recommended to achieve velocities within the regulatory acceptable range. Operational parameters for lift station pumps, as provided within the hydraulic model result in indicated surcharging of gravity collection lines in some areas. Operational parameters of the lift stations were evaluated, and recommendations for adjustment, where needed, are indicated. Information on the operational parameters that were provided in the hydraulic model, and the related recommendations are provided in Appendix B. 5.2.1.. Allison Wastewater Basin The Alison Service area includes fifteen lift stations. Anticipated future flows from the Calallen Planning Area are included in the Allison Service area for the evaluation of ten-year and ultimate flows. 5-3 Hydraulic modeling of peak wet-weather flows indicates that the lift stations currently have sufficient capacity.Wet wells at the Clarkwood North, Cynthia, Ramos, River Canyon, and Sharpsburg lift stations are undersized for the current modeled flows and expansion is recommended. Force main velocities, as modeled, at the Clarkwood South and Cynthia lift stations exceed acceptable limits and upgrading these force mains with larger pipes is recommended. Lift station control adjustments are indicated at the River Canyon and Highway 77 lift stations. Proposed improvements and flow data for the current conditions are shown on Exhibit 9. Area Development Plans 5-4 Exhibit 10. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction 5-5 Exhibit 11 For ultimate build out conditions, upsized wet wells are recommended for Clarkwood North, Highway 77, and Lakes Northwest. Force main upgrades are recommended at Highway 77 and Lakes Northwest along with increased pump capacity at Highway 77.Three new Lift Stations are recommended to accommodate future Development. Figure 5.2 provides information on the proposed upgrades for future flows and proposed locations for new lift stations.Table 5-3 Provides a summary of the proposed upgrades for the existing lift stations. Table 5-3.Allison System Summary Existing Recommended Ultimate Lift Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Clarkwood North 8 12 10 Yes 14 Clarkwood South 8 4 Yes Cynthia 4 2 8 4 Yes Highway 77 8 2 4 16 12 Yes Lakes Northwest 8 8 16 14 Northwest Crossing 12 12 Nueces Acres 8 6 Yes Ramos 4 6 River Canyon 6 8 Yes Sharpsburg 15 24 24 Yes 24 Solar Estates 6 6 Stillwell 10 10 Upriver Road 19 8 Wood River 12 16 De Dietrich 6 8 Specific capacities, sizes,timing, and other information are provided on the individual project sheets in Appendix C. The Highway 77 lift station is being replaced with a new, larger station which will be called the CR 52 Lift station. An existing 6-inch force main will be utilized and the new pump station is designed with an initial capacity to match the capacity of the existing force main.The design also allows for expansion to meet future needs. 5-6 5,2,2, Broadway The Broadway Service area includes 17 Lift Stations. Model results indicate that one lift station,Arcadia, where current flows exceed capacity and pump,wet well, and force main upgrades are recommended. Arcadia is included in the Broadway Service Areas as flows are currently directed to the Broadway WWTP. Currently flows from Arcadia can be directed to Broadway, Greenwood, or Oso WWTPs. Plans are in place to abandon the Arcadia—Oso force main, and flows are currently directed to Broadway WWTP. Modeling for this station showed flows going to greenwood. As the City intends to direct flows to Broadway WWTP,the information for this station has been moved to the Broadway Service Area. Future modeling updates should direct flows to Broadway WWTP. For the remaining system, lifts stations,force mains, wet wells, and gravity piping have adequate capacity under current flow conditions. Adjusting the lift station operational controls would improve service in seven sub-basins; Coopers Alley L-Head, Lawrence Stret T-Head, Magee Beach, Morgan, Peoples Street T-Head, Studebaker, and North Beach C. See Exhibit 12 for location and flow data. Under Ultimate flow conditions the model results indicate lift stations, force mains and wet wells have adequate capacity and no additional lift stations are required. See Exhibit 13.Table 5-4 provides a summary of proposed actions. Table 5-4 Broadway System Summary Existing Recommended Ultimate Lift Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Arcadia 22.75 16 22.75* 24 Yes Coopers Alley L-Head g 6 Yes Lawrence St.T-Head 7 6 Yes Magee Beach 6 4 Yes Morgan 17 12 Yes Peoples Street T-Head 7 6 Yes Studebaker 12 g Yes North Beach C 12 g Yes North Beach D 12 12 North Beach B 12 8 North Beach E 6 4 Nueces Bay 7 6 5-7 Existing Recommended Ultimate Lift Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Rincon South 6 4 Rincon North 6 4 Cole Park NA NA Brownlee NA NA Resaca NA NA *Rebuild Wet Well with other upgrades See Appendix B for details. 5.2.3, Greenwood The greenwood Service area includes thirteen lift stations. Current flow model results indicated that peak flows at three lift stations exceed current capacity and pump,wet well, and force main upgrades are recommended at Kostoryz, McBride, and Port/Pearse stations. Upgrades were recently completed by the city at the McBride Lift station. However, these upgrades may not fully meet the requirements as provided in the model. Recommended improvements have been left in place; however, current costs have been adjusted to reflect current work completed. An additional force main upgrade is recommended for the Sacky lift station. System performance in the sub-basins for the Highway 9 and Sacky lift stations would also benefit from revising the lift station controls. See Exhibit 14. Under ultimate buildout conditions the Coastal Meadows lift station will require an upsize to the force main and the Highway Nine and Sacky lift stations will require upsized wet wells.The highway nine lift station will also need to increase pump capacity. In addition, up to six new lift stations will be required to provide future service as the area develops as shown on Exhibit 15.Table 5-5presents a summary of the Greenwood lift station conditions and recommendations. 5-8 Table 5-5 Greenwood System Summary Existing Recommended Ultimate Lift Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Airport 9 10 Coastal Meadows 6.5 6 8 Highway Nine g g Yes 14 Yes Kostoryz 2185 2@16; 24 30 Yes 1@12 Levi County Jail 11.1 6 McBride* 16.6 20 24 24 Yes Yes Sacky 12 16 20 20 Trojan 9.85 6 Lexington 14.15 6 Port/Pearse 15.6 24 24 30 Yes Charlies Place NA NA Rose Acres NA NA Westpoint Crossing NA NA NA= Data not available *McBride Lift Station—Recent improvements have been completed at this pump station and a recommendation based on the model results for current conditions may not be necessary. See Appendix C for details. 5.2.4. London Development in the London area is recent and is anticipated to continue at a rate higher than other areas of the city and a separate planning area has been developed to address the anticipated development.There are currently two new Lift Stations, the Oso Creek Lift, and the London East Lift Stations in the London area. Development in the areas of these lift stations is limited at the present time, and no meaningful current flow data is available.The London East lift station currently sends flows through a temporary force main under Oso Creek to the Oso WWTP.The current capacity of this lift station is limited by the capacity of the receiving system in the Oso Service area. A capital improvement project has been identified and is currently under design to upsize London East lift station and a force main to take flows to the Greenwood WWTP.The Oso Creek lift station currently directs flows to the Greenwood WWTP. 5-9 Ten-year flows are anticipated to be within the current capacity of the existing Lift Stations and the upgrade to the London East Lift station will be required to manage ultimate buildout flows. See Exhibit 16 for additional information. 5.2.5, Laguna Madre Laguna Madre is services by twelve existing lift stations. Model results for current flow conditions indicate that improvements to two lift stations are necessary to provide adequate service for current conditions.The Laguna Shores lifts station needs increased pumping and wet well capacity, and the Military and Jester Lift station requires a larger force main and an upsized wet well. Adjusting the operational controls on six lift stations is recommended to reduce surcharging and the potential for SSOs. Adjustments to controls are recommended for laguna Shores, Military and Jester, Rex, Riviera, Turtle Cove, and the Waldron lift stations as shown on Exhibit 17. At the ultimate buildout conditions, the existing Lift Station will not require any additional upgrades. Three new lift stations and associated force mains are recommended to support future flows beyond the ten-year horizon as shown on Exhibit 18.Table 5-6 provides a summary of proposed upgrades and details are available on the individual project sheets in Appendix C. Table 5-6 Laguna Madre System Summary Existing Recommended Ultimate Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Flour Bluff 10 14 Gateway Park 10 4 Jamaica 12 8 Laguna Shores 14 18 22 Yes Yes Military and Jester 10 10 20 12 Yes Purdue g 6 Rhetta Place 6 6 Rex g g Yes Riviera 20 12 Yes Turtle Cove 10 g Yes Waldron 15 12 Yes Walmart 6 g 5-10 526, Oso Wastewater in the Oso Service Area is transported at twenty-three lift stations. Upgrades are recommended at one lift station to provide adequate service for current conditions, as modeled. Wet well and force main upgrades are recommended at the Perry Place Lift Station. Performance at four lift stations, Country Club, Everhart/Staples, Perry Place, and Station 5, may benefit from adjustments to the controls. Upgrades at one lift station are recommended to meet future demands. Increased pump and wet well capacity are recommended at the Everhart/Staples lift station. Ultimate buildout conditions are presented on Exhibit 19 and Table 5-7provides a summary of recommended improvements. Details for the upgrades are provided on individual project sheets in Appendix C. Table 5-7 Oso System Summary Existing Recommended Ultimate Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Airline 22 12 Anchor Harbor 6 g Bay Drive 12 10 Buckingham 15.6 10 Cimarron 7.67 14 Country Club 12 24 Yes Everhart/Staples 13.12 24 Yes 14 Yes Greenfield by the Bay 12 12 Kings Crossing 6 12 Lakes 6 10 Oleander 4 4 Pelican Bay 6 4 Perry Place 6 10 12 16 Yes Schanen 9 g Slough 12 10 Starry 12 12 Station 5 12.36 24 Yes Sugar Tree 6 12 TAMUCC 6 g 5-11 Existing Recommended Ultimate Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Webers Glen 11.5 12 Williams 32 36 Wooldridge II 12 16 Wooldridge 26 30 5.2.7. White Cap White Cap is served by 19 lift stations. Modeling for the current conditions recommends upgrades to the wet well and force main for the Seahorse Lift Station and the Jackfish and PI Section 4 lift stations both have wet well upgrades proposed. Exhibit 18 provides additional information. Under ultimate flow conditions upgrades to the force main for Seahorse and PI Section 4 are recommended along with an additional upgrade to the Pi Section 4 wet well. Up to ten additional lifts stations may be required to meet future growth conditions in the White Cap Service area as shown on Exhibit 20.Table 5-8 provides a summary of the proposed upgrades. Table 5-8 White Cap System Summary Existing Recommended Ultimate Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps Controls (FT) (In) Pumps Aquarius 10 12 Coquino Bay 11.5 6 Cumana 6 6 Gypsy 7.92 8 Jackfish 7.67 10 10 Kennedy Causeway 6 4 Lake Padre South 7.67 8 Leeward 11.5 10 Park Road 22 15.5 16 Park Road 53 6 6 PI Section 4 4.2 14 20 24 18 Sea Pines 8 6 10 6 Seahorse 6 4 6 Swordfish 6 6 10 Tesoro 6 6 5-12 Existing Recommended Ultimate Station Wet Force Wet Force Wet Force Well Main Well Main Upsize Pump Well Main Upsize (FT) (In) (FT) (In) Pumps controls (FT) (In) Pumps Verdemar 10 8 Kennedy Causeway II NA NA Zahn 6 8 Packery Pointe NA NA NA—data not available 5.3. Gravity Collection System Gravity flow wastewater pipes and manholes, as provided in the SewerGEMs model, were evaluated under current and future flow conditions, and compared to existing capacity of each segment of pipe based on provided size and slope of the pipe. Assets included in the current Capital Improvement plan were included in the overall analysis to the extent that information was available. Assets that indicated a surcharge or overflow conditions were compared to City data and the currently established or proposed Capital Improvement Project lists, additional projects have been developed to address current inefficiencies and future needs that are complementary to current plans. Evaluation criteria for recommending up-sizing of pipes was based on providing sufficient capacity to prevent SSOs and to limit surcharging to three feet below the ground surface. Further reductions in surcharging would require upgrades to significant portions of the system. Recommended gravity pipe upgrades are generally shown on Exhibits 9 through 19 and details are provided on the individual project maps and project sheets provided in Appendices 2 and 3. Areas of specific concern or additional consideration are discussed below. .5.3..1., Allison In the 10-year and ultimate time frames, growth in the areas of the Stillwell, Northwest Crossing, and Solar Estates lift station drainage areas will overwhelm the capacity of the deep 27-inch gravity sewer carrying the flow to the Allison WWTP on the eastern side. Rather than upsizing this large and deep pipe, paralleling it with an 18" gravity sewer would relieve the capacity constraints and would be more economical. Additionally, a parallel pipe is suggested over pipe upsizing near the Sharpsburg/highway 77 area due to slope considerations. 5-13 5.3.2, Broadway The 2022 Capacity Constraint Maps show capacity constraints not relieved by a 35% RDII reduction along Antelope Drive and back up onto Mueller Street and Old Robstown Road.The SewerGEMS models of the Broadway Basin, as provided, showed multiple configurations for pipes in the Harbor Bridge area. Harbor bridge construction includes significant changes to utilities and the model contains past, current, and proposed pipes. Information from the City GIS system was used to select pipes and locations to include in the model, although the accuracy of the information has not been field verified. Modeling with the date from the GIS system indicated that the capacity constraints along Antelope, Mueller and Old Robstown roads are relieved until the ultimate time frame. 5.3.3. Greenwood Several pipes near the Kostoryz lift station had negative slopes in the SewerGems model. The resulting model output indicates significant surcharging in the area. Replacement of gravity lines in this area is recommended; however,verification of pipe slopes and inverts should be completed first and the actual extent of upgrades determined. 5,3.4. Oso Gravity piping from the Perry Place Lift Station drainage area to the Oso WWTP are noted to have capacity problems and associated capacity related SSOs are noted in the model. A significant number of properties could connect to the existing system as this area develops. Instead of upsizing major pipes to the WWTP, a proposed solution would be to enlarge the Perry Place lift station and install a force main to Nile Drive.This would relieve the gravity system upstream of Nile Drive and allow for growth in the Perry Place area. Replacement of selected pipe near the Oso WWTP on Nile Drive would release the bottleneck for the rest of the upstream system. 5-14 6. COST FACTORS Proposed projects have been developed to address the identified capacity constraints that currently exist and that are anticipated based on potential development. To provide a reasonable estimate of cost for the proposed projects cost factors have been developed that can be applied proposed work to develop a budgetary level estimate of project costs. Estimates of cost are high level and are based on generally accepted construction practices, overall capacity needs, materials, sizes, and depth of various system components and are not based on a specific design. Unless otherwise noted, costs were developed based on an estimate of the direct construction costs. Program costs were then added as a percentage of the construction cost as noted in Table 6-1. Table 6-1 Project Costs Expenditure Cost (As a Percent of Direct Cost) Direct Construction Cost 0(base cost) Mobilization 10% Bonds and Insurance 5% Overhead and Profit 10% Design and Inspection 15% Contingency 30% Implementation schedules for individual projects will be a function of funding availability, growth, and other factors that are not predictable. Costs are provided in 2023 dollar values and an appropriate time based escalation factor should be included depending on the actual implementation schedule determined by the City. Factors developed and applied to elements of the Wastewater collection and treatment system are discussed in the following sections. 6.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants Projects are currently underway and planned at each of the WWTPs that will address current capacity concerns and provide adequate capacity for the anticipated growth over the next ten years. Projects to address efficiency and capacity for the long term have been proposed as well. In general, expanding an existing WWTP or constructing a new WWTP will have a typical cost on the order of$12.00 per gallon of treatment capacity. This is a general factor and can be used to provide a 6-1 high-level budgetary estimate for capacity expansion. Upgrades to processes and technology are generally significantly lower. For example, process improvements currently underway at the White Cap WWTP are estimated to cost$4.90 per gallon of treatment capacity. Costs for process improvements can vary widely depending on the type of process involved and the extent of the improvements. Costing for the current and planned CIP projects are listed as currently estimated by the city. Proposed CIP projects were costed using cost data from recently completed, current, and planned near term projects. Cost details for the WWTP CIP projects are provided in Appendix C. 6.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains Lift station capacity can be increased by replacing existing pumps with larger pumps or by adding additional pumps. Pump costs were developed based on flow capacity and horsepower, where the horsepower required is a function of the elevation difference between the pump and force main outlet, the size and length of the force main and predicted flow velocity within the force main. A cost matrix was developed to allow selection of pump prices based on current or predicted development needs. Cost matrices were also developed for wet wells based on diameter and depth and for force mains based on diameter of the pipe and assuming a standard depth of burial. Additional costs were included to cover site work, electrical, and other ancillary items. Where a new lift station or replacement of a lift station are recommended a generalized cost of$1,800 per gallon per minute of capacity can be used. Costing was based on recently completed and planned projects of similar nature. In additional local contractors were contacted and requested to provide unit pricing for current market conditions. Costs for force mains and wet wells have been developed based on current operational volume and volume required to accommodate growth. Generally, costs have been developed base increasing the size of the existing force main or the existing wet well. Other options such as installing a parallel force main or a second wet well to accommodate the volume needs are acceptable and may be more economical in some cases. It is beyond the scope of this planning effort to develop and evaluate design alternatives for individual projects. Costs presented are conservative and are intended to be budgetary in nature. As such, costs should be sufficient to cover alternatives selected during design for individual projects. 6-2 6.3. Gravity Collection System Pricing for gravity collection portion of the system is a function of pipe size, length and depth of burial with consideration of the surface conditions at the location (pavement or unpaved areas). Unit prices included costs for removal of existing pipe (where applicable), materials, excavation, trench safety, backfill, traffic control, and bypass pumping. Pricing information was taken from recent projects and from information requested from local contractors. Project pricing was developed by taking the mid-point of the segment to be upsized or installed and determining the depth range for the pipe. Unit costs for the selected depth were then applied to the length. Manhole costs were developed similarly, and a costs matrix was developed based on the diameter of the manhole and depth. Manhole spacing is based on the requirements in the current City of Corpus Christi Infrastructure Design Manual. 6-3 7. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The capital improvements have been divided into near term, 10-year and ultimate projects. "Near term" are projects that should be completed or and in the process of being completed prior to 2025. 10-Year are projects that aren't immediately needed but should be completed for growth in the next ten years. Ultimate projects are projects defined for the ultimate buildout of the City.Appendix C includes individual costing sheets for each recommended project. Appendix D provides a map for each project. Although the amount of development that will occur in the next ten years can be predicted, it is difficult to determine with reasonable accuracy where that growth will occur. Generally, costs were developed for the current project needs and for the ultimate flow conditions project needs. Ten-year costs were then developed by taking a percentage of the ultimate project costs based on predicted growth rates. Based on the breakdown generated using this approach a list of probable ten-year projects has been developed. For convenience,Table 7-1 provides a summation of improvements that should occur between 2022 and 2024. Some of the improvements include costs that are attributable to growth.Those dual projects are shown in a separate column for convenience. Table 7-1. Near Term Improvements Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Allison Increase wet well diameter from 8'to 10'for an additional 600 gallons between 2022-2024,the wet 1 of 238 Clarkwood North well will need to be upsized again to 14'for an $133,800 additional 850 gallons to meet ultimate flow conditions.Controls will also need to be adjusted. Increase wet well diameter from 4'to 8'for an additional 132 gallons between 2022-2024,controls 2 of 238 Cynthia will also need to be adjusted.Force Main needs to $113,400 be upsized from 2"to 4" between 2022-2024. Rehabilitate/repair wet well and force main to meet current flow conditions. Force Main to be upsized from 2"to 4" between 2022-2024.For ultimate conditions,pumps must be 3 of 238 Highway 77 upsized,wet well will need to be upsized from 8'to $240,700 16'for an additional 3,500 gallons and the Force Main will need to be further upsized from 4"to 12". Rehabilitate/repair force main to meet current flow 7-1 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) conditions between 2022-2024.Upgrade pumps, wet well diameter,and force main to meet ultimate conditions. Lift station will need to be upgraded between 2022- 2024 to hold an additional 6,000 gallons and 6 of 238 Sharpsburg >5 MGD upgraded in ultimate conditions for an additional 9, p g LS( 400 gallons:Wet well,force main,and pumps to be $907,800 upsized and replaced.Upgrade lift station to meet ultimate flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1290 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Chispa Creek in Allison WWTP Service Area. 21 of 238 Chispa Creek $787,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 510 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Nolford in Allison WWTP Service Area. 23 of 238 Nolford $317,900 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 700 LF of 10 inch pipe, 130 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Palisade in Allison 24 of 238 Palisade WWTP Service Area. $417,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 280 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Raintree in Allison WWTP Service Area. 25 of 238 Raintree $180,900 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1000 LF of 15 inch pipe, along Cynthia in Allison WWTP Service Area. 31 of 238 Cynthia $568,500 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1200 LF of 15 inch pipe, along Sharpsburg Section 2 in Allison WWTP Service 32 of 238 Sharpsburg Section 2 Area. $761,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. WWTP City CIP project E10043 21,808,066 Total 26,237,166 Broadway Replace existing pipe with 4820 LF of 30 inch pipe, 46 of 238 Antelope along Antelope in Broadway WWTP Service Area. $4,445,000 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 500 LF of 10 inch pipe, 47 of 238 Leigh along Leigh in Broadway WWTP Service Area. $303,800 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions 7-2 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Replace existing pipe with 710 LF of 10 inch pipe, 450 LF of 20 inch pipe,520 LF of 24 inch pipe,along 48 of 238 Leopard Section 3 Leopard Section 3 in Broadway WWTP Service Area. $1,077,300 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 460 LF of 18 inch pipe, 420 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Nueces Bay in 49 of 238 Nueces Bay Broadway WWTP Service Area. $625,600 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 1380 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Old Robstown in Broadway WWTP Service 50 of 238 Old Robstown Area. $889,700 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 190 LF of 15 inch pipe, 2220 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Up River Section 1 in 51 of 238 Up River Section 1 Broadway WWTP Service Area. $110,600 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current capacity issues. Replace existing pipe with 1240 LF of 15 inch pipe, 52 of 238 Villa along Villa in Broadway WWTP Service Area. $669,100 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 320 LF of 10 inch pipe, along Westchester in Broadway WWTP Service 53 of 238 Westchester Area. $133,800 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions WWTP City CIP Project 18084 7,475,138 WWTP City CIP Project 21001 9,345,000 Total 25,075,038 Greenwood Lift station renovation,force main diameter must be increased to 24",and pumps upsized between 7 of 238 Arcadia(>SMGD) 2022-2024. $28,115,600 Rehabilitate and repair lift station to meet current flow conditions. Wet well to be upsized from 21.85'to 34'diameter for an additional 17,610 gallons,force main to be 10 of 238 Kostor z >5MGD upsized to 30",and the pumps are to be upsized y ( ) between 2022-2024. $41,181,800 Lift station rehabilitation needed in order to meet current flow conditions. 11 of 238 McBride >5MGD Lift Station wet well diameter to be increased to 24' ( ) for an additional 11,400 gallons,force main $26,725,700 7-3 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) diameter to be upsized to 24",and pumps need to be upsized. Lift station rehabilitation needed in order to meet current flow conditions. Lift Station wet well diameter to be increased to 24' for an additional 22,000 gallons,force main diameter to be upsized to 30",and pumps need to 12 of 238 Port/Pearse(>5MGD) be upsized between 2022-2024. $57,081,500 Lift station rehabilitation needed in order to meet current flow conditions. Force Main to be upsized from 16"to 20"for between 2022-2024.In ultimate flow conditions, the lift station wet well will require a diameter. 13 of 238 Sacky(>5MGD) of 20'for an additional 7,400 gallons and pumps will $3,039,000 need to be upsized. Lift station improvements needed in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 320 LF of 10 inch pipe, along Westchester in Broadway WWTP Service 54 of 238 Edwards Area. $640,000 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 300 LF of 18 inch pipe,70 LF of 20 inch pipe,170 LF of 24 inch pipe,along 55 of 238 Kosar Kosar in Greenwood WWTP Service $436,200 Area. Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 3140 LF of 18 inch pipe, 56 of 238 Naples along Naples in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $2,294,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 860 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Shely in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. 57 of 238 Shely $379,600 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 1340 LF of 20 inch pipe, 58 of 238 Staples Section 1 along Staples Section 1 in Greenwood WWTP $964,400 Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 1040 LF of 24 inch pipe, 59 of 238 York along York in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $713,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 970 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Ayers Section 1 in Greenwood WWTP Service 60 of 238 Ayers Section 1 Area. $256,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions 7-4 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Replace existing pipe with 130 LF of 12 inch pipe, 940 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Leopard Section 4 in 62 of 238 Leopard Section 4 Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $620,500 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 1260 LF of 16 inch pipe, 66 of 238 Benys along Benys in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $793,200 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 750 LF of 16 inch pipe, 67 of 238 Clifton along Clifton in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $412,600 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 990 LF of 20 inch pipe, 68 of 238 Concho along Concho in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $916,400 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 410 LF of 16 inch pipe, 69 of 238 Derry along Derry in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $227,200 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 2290 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Lantana in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. 70 of 238 Lantana $2,206,000 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 340 LF of 30 inch pipe, along McBride Section 1 in Greenwood WWTP 72 of 238 McBride Section 1 Service Area. $377,100 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 730 LF of 16 inch pipe, 470 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Padre Island in 73 of 238 Padre Island Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $757,900 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 310 LF of 16 inch pipe, 74 of 238 Skyline along Skyline in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $220,400 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 440 LF of 16 inch pipe, 2240 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Ayers Section 2 in 79 of 238 Ayers Section 2 Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $1,874,600 $1,877,400 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 360 LF of 16 inch pipe, 380 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Hwy 286 in 81 of 238 Hwy 286 Greenwood WWTP Service Area. $527,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions 7-5 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) WWTP City CIP Project E10180 7,310,251 WWTP City CIP Project 18087 6,953,323 WWTP City CIP Project 18089 46,262,007 Tota 1 231,287,081 1,877,400 Laguna Madre Wet well to be upsized to have a diameter of 22'for 14 of 238 Shores Laguna >5MGD an additional 6,000 gallons between 2022-2024. g ( Lift station rehabilitation and repairs needed in $15,300,000 order to meet current flow conditions. Force Main to be upsized from 10"to 12"and wet well to be upsized from 10'to 20'for an additional 15 of 238 Military and Jester 3,700 gallons between 2022-2024. $2,369,600 Lift station and force main rehabilitation and repairs needed to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 410 LF of 24 inch pipe, along Belmont in Laguna Madre WWTP Service 88 of 238 Belmont Area. $283,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1790 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Glenoak in Laguna Madre WWTP Service 89 of 238 Glenoak Area. $832,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 500 LF of 12 inch pipe, along St Bernadine in Laguna Madre WWTP Service 90 of 238 St Bernadine Area. $220,900 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. WWTP City CIP Project 18086 6,373,323 Total 25,379,823 Oso Upsize wet well from 6'to 12'for an additional 1,200 gallons and upsize force main from 10"to 16" 17 of 238 Perry Place WW between 2022-2024.Lift station rehabilitation and $14,793,400 repairs needed in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 3160 LF of 21 inch pipe, 75 of 238 Williams along Williams in Oso WWTP Service Area. $2,323,700 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 1130 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Cherry Hills in Oso WWTP Service Area. 95 of 238 Cherry Hills $1,137,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. 7-6 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Replace existing pipe with 830 LF of 24 inch pipe, along Everhart Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 96 of 238 Everhart Section 1 $860,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1060 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Greenbriar in Oso WWTP Service Area. 97 of 238 Greenbriar $1,064,000 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 340 LF of 12 inch pipe, 950 LF of 16 inch pipe,along St Andrews in Oso 99 of 238 St Andrews WWTP Service Area. $1,009,800 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 260 LF of 24 inch pipe, 2000 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Country Club in Oso 104 of 238 Country Club WWTP Service Area. $2,934,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 4430 LF of 24 inch pipe, along Gaines in Oso WWTP Service Area. 105 of 238 Gaines $3,186,400 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1300 LF of 24 inch pipe, along Jarvis in Oso WWTP Service Area. 106 of 238 Jarvis $895,900 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 10 LF of 21 inch pipe,730 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Robert in Oso WWTP 108 of 238 Robert Service Area. $515,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 4160 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Wardle Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 110 of 238 Wardle Section 1 $2,831,200 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1080 LF of 12 inch pipe, 112 of 238 Easter along Easter in Oso WWTP Service Area. $555,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 100 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Wardle Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 113 of 238 Wardle Section 2 $49,400 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 20 LF of 16 inch pipe, 2340 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Christie in Oso WWTP 114 of 238 Christie Service Area. $2,016,000 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. 7-7 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Replace existing pipe with 150 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Cuiper in Oso WWTP Service Area. 115 of 238 Cuiper $132,600 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 660 LF of 30 inch pipe, along Gollihar Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 116 of 238 Gollihar Section 2 $948,500 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1110 LF of 16 inch pipe, 1220 LF of 18 inch pipe,9160 LF of 24 inch pipe,640 117 of 238 Santa Fe Section 1 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Santa Fe $9,587,300 Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 4960 LF of 36 inch pipe, along Everhart Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 118 of 238 Everhart Section 2 $5,201,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 170 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Santa Fe Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 119 of 238 Santa Fe Section 2 $10,800 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 2380 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Acushnet in Oso WWTP Service Area. 120 of 238 Acushnet $1,936,200 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 970 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Braesvalley in Oso WWTP Service Area. 122 of 238 Braesvalley $540,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 2890 LF of 20 inch pipe, 440 LF of 21 inch pipe,130 LF of 24 inch pipe,along 123 of 238 Everhart Section 3 Everhart Section 3 in Oso WWTP $2,702,000 Service Area. Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1020 LF of 20 inch pipe, 124 of 238 Middlecoff along Middlecoff in Oso WWTP Service Area. $858,000 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 180 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Sanders in Oso WWTP Service Area. 125 of 238 Sanders $149,100 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 870 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Shadowbend in Oso WWTP Service Area. 126 of 238 Shadowbend $544,800 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. 7-8 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Replace existing pipe with 1000 LF of 16 inch pipe, 640 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Timbergate in Oso 128 of 238 Timbergate WWTP Service Area. $1,002,400 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1260 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Willowick in Oso WWTP Service Area. 129 of 238 Willowick $791,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 610 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Del Starr in Oso WWTP Service Area. 130 of 238 Del Starr $386,000 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1100 LF of 20 inch pipe, 131 of 238 Everhart Section 4 along Everhart Section 4 in Oso WWTP Service Area. $1,535,800 Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1590 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Kerry in Oso WWTP Service Area. 132 of 238 Kerry $1,084,000 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 550 LF of 20 inch pipe, 134 of 238 Limerick along Limerick in Oso WWTP Service Area. $601,000 Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 860 LF of 18 inch pipe, along O'Brian in Oso WWTP Service Area. 135 of 238 O'Brian $566,200 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 350 LF of 20 inch pipe, 136 of 238 Schanen along Schanen in Oso WWTP Service Area. $443,000 Upgrade gravity to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 2280 LF of 20 inch pipe, 137 of 238 Shea along Shea in Oso WWTP Service Area. $443,000 Upgrade gravity pipes to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with 260 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Audn in Oso WWTP Service Area. 138 of 238 Audn $164,700 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 900 LF of 16 inch pipe, 139 of 238 Boardwalk along Boardwalk in Oso WWTP Service Area. $496,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 420 LF of 16 inch pipe, 140 of 238 Bollinger along Bollinger in Oso WWTP Service Area. $234,400 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. 7-9 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Replace existing pipe with 50 LF of 12 inch pipe,610 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Brockhampton in Oso 141 of 238 Brockhampton WWTP Service Area. $397,300 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 280 LF of 12 inch pipe, 2370 LF of 24 inch pipe,4640 LF of 30 inch pipe, along Cimarron in Oso WWTP Service 142 of 238 Cimarron $5,957,600 Area. Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 140 LF of 16 inch pipe, along New Bedford in Oso WWTP Service Area. 143 of 238 New Bedford $77,600 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1130 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Queen Bess in Oso WWTP Service Area. 144 of 238 Queen Bess $779,400 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 730 LF of 12 inch pipe, 820 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Stonehenge in Oso 145 of 238 Stonehenge WWTP Service Area. $788,200 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 660 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Strateford in Oso WWTP Service Area. 146 of 238 Strateford $380,500 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1050 LF of 12 inch pipe, along Washam in Oso WWTP Service Area. 147 of 238 Washam $529,200 Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions. WWTP City CIP Project 20084B 4,942,700 WWTP City CIP Project 20084A 69,777,500 Total 146,024,500 2,136,800 Whitecap Increase wet well diameter from 7.67'to 10'for an 18 of 238 Jackfish additional 500 gallons.Lift station rehabilitation and $133,800 repairs needed in order to meet current flow conditions. Upsize wet well from 4.2'to 20'for an additional 3,700 gallons before 2024.Wet well will need to be increased to 24'for an additional 2,800 gallons for 19 of 238 PI Section 4 ultimate conditions and force main diameter $975,600 increased from 4"to 18".Lift station rehabilitation/repair needed in order to meet current flow conditions. 7-10 Total 2022 Total 2022 Cost-Non- Cost- Project# Project Name Description Growth Partial Related ($) Growth Related ($) Upsize wet well diameter from 6'to 10'for an additional 400 gallons and force main diameter 4" 20 of 238 Seahorse to 6" between 2023-2024. Lift station to be $218,000 rehabilitated in order to meet current flow conditions. WWTP City CIP Project 23037 15,442,401 Tota 1 16,769,801 Similarly, projects have been identified that will be required for the next 10 years of growth in each service area.These are included in Table 7-2. Some of these projects include near term improvements as well. Table 7-2. 10-Year Projects Project# Project Name Description Total 2022 Total 2031Cost($) Cost($) Allison Wet well to be upsized from 8'to 16'for an 4 of 238 Lakes Northwest additional 2,800 gallons and force main from $0 $4,778,700 8"to 14"in ultimate time frame Increase wet well diameter from 8'to 10'for an additional 600 gallons between 2022-2024, 1 of 238 Clarkwood North the wet well will need to be upsized again to $133,800 $2,747,200 14'for an additional 850 gallons to meet ultimate flow conditions.Controls will also need to be adjusted. Force Main to be upsized from 2"to 4" between 2022-2024.For ultimate conditions, 3 of 238 Highway 77 pumps must be upsized,wet well will need to $240,700 $4,921,300 be upsized from 8'to 16'for an additional 3,500 gallons and the Force Main will need to be further upsized from 4"to 12". Lift station will need to be upgraded between Sharpsburg LS(>5 2022-2024 to hold an additional 6,000 gallons 6 of 238 MGD) and upgraded in ultimate conditions for an $907,800 $4,774,700 additional 9,400 gallons:Wet well,force main, and pumps to be upsized and replaced. 5 of 238 River Canyon Pumps need to be upsized for ten year and $0 $411,400 ultimate flow conditions. WWTP Allison UV Disinfection Improvements $3,280,000 $1,720,000 Total 4,562,300 19,353,300 Broadway 7-11 Project# Project Name Description Total 2022 Total 2031Cost($) Cost($) WWTP Broadway Filtration Improvements $2,550,000 $2,450,000 Total 2,550,000 2,450,000 Greenwood Replace force main with gravity pipe.Install 8 of 238 Coastal Meadows 10,400 LF of 24"gravity pipe. $0 $6,188,000 Lift Station wet well upsized from 8'to 14'for 9 of 238 Highway Nine an additional 775 gallons,controls to be $0 $1,554,400 adjusted between 2022-2024. Wet well to be upsized from 21.85'to 34'for 10 of 238 Kostor z >5MGD an additional 17,610 gallons diameter,force y ( ) main to be upsized to 30",and the pumps are $41,181,800 $3,780,300 to be upsized between 2022-2024. Lift Station wet well diameter to be increased 11 of 238 McBride >5MGD to 24'for an additional 11,400 gallons,force ( ) main diameter to be upsized to 24",and $26,725,700 $8,179,700 pumps need to be upsized. Force Main to be upsized from 16"to 20"for between 2022-2024.In ultimate flow 13 of 238 Sacky(>5MGD) conditions,the lift station wet well will require $3,039,000 $3,003,700 a diameter of 20'for an additional 7,400 gallons and pumps will need to be upsized. Install 1000 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 192 of 238 New_London2 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin $0 $18,978,200 WWTP Service Area. Install 2000 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 193 of 238 New_London3 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin $0 $2,908,200 WWTP Service Area. Install 2000 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 196 of 238 New_London6 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin $0 $9,558,900 WWTP Service Area. Install 3400 LF of new 42 inch gravity pipe in 198 of 238 New_London8 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin $0 $12,176,100 WWTP Service Area. Install 4150 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe in 200 of 238 New_London10 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin $0 $8,786,800 WWTP Service Area. WWTP Greenwood WWTP Expansion $63,500,000 Total 70,946,500 138,614,300 Laguna Madre WWTP Laguna Madre UV Disinfection Improvements $3,733,333 $1,266,667 Total 3,733,333 1,266,667 Oso Wet well upsizing from 13.12'to 24'for an 16 of 238 Everhart/Staples additional 14,800 gallons in ultimate $0 $41,843,100 conditions.Force Main to be upsized to an equivalent diameter of 36". WWTP Oso Operations Center $3,580,000 $0 7-12 Project# Project Name Description Total 2022 Total 2031Cost($) Cost($) WWTP Oso UV Disinfection and Filtration Improvements $21,347,222 $7,652,758 Total 24,927,222 49,495,858 Whitecap Upsize wet well from 4.2'to 20'for an additional 3,700 gallons before 2024.Wet well 19 of 238 PI Section 4 will need to be increased to 24'for an $975,600 $3,226,300 additional 2,800 gallons for ultimate conditions and force main diameter increased from 4"to 18". Finally, there are improvements that will be needed for ultimate build-out of the system These are shown in Table 7-3. Some of these projects are also included in near-term and 10-year projects.These costs are included in this table for convenience. Table 7-3. Ultimate Projects Total Tota12031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Allison Wet well to be upsized from 8'to 16'for an 4 of 238 Lakes Northwest additional 2,800 gallons and force main from 8" $0 $4,778,700 $10,388,200 to 14"in ultimate time frame 5 of 238 River Canyon Pumps need to be upsized for ten year and $0 $411,400 $979,200 ultimate flow conditions. Increase wet well diameter from 8'to 10'for an additional 600 gallons between 2022-2024,the 1 of 238 Clarkwood North wet well will need to be upsized again to 14'for $133,800 $2,747,200 $9,302,400 an additional 850 gallons to meet ultimate flow conditions.Controls will also need to be adjusted. Force Main to be upsized from 2"to 4"between 2022-2024.For ultimate conditions,pumps must 3 of 238 Highway 77 be upsized,wet well will need to be upsized from $240,700 $4,921,300 $10,252,300 8'to 16'for an additional 3,500 gallons and the Force Main will need to be further upsized from 4"to 12". Lift station will need to be upgraded between Sharpsburg LS(>5 2022-2024 to hold an additional 6,000 gallons 6 of 238 MGD) and upgraded in ultimate conditions to hold $907,800 $4,774,700 $15,536,300 9,400 gallons:Wet well,force main,and pumps to be upsized and replaced. Replace existing pipe with 10 LF of 27 inch pipe, 22 of 238 La Branch along La Branch in Allison WWTP Service Area. $0 $0 $5,600 Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions. 7-13 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Replace existing pipe with 950 LF of 12 inch pipe, 26 of 238 Sessions along Sessions in Allison WWTP Service Area. $0 $0 $1,032,400 Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 830 LF of 18 inch pipe, 27 of 238 Wandering Creek along Wandering Creek in Allison WWTP Service $0 $0 $550,700 Area.Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions. Replace existing pipe with 1500 LF of 12 inch 28 of 238 Clarkwood pipe,4080 LF of 15 inch pipe,along Clarkwood in $0 $0 $3,317,300 Allison WWTP Service Area. 29 of 238 1-37 Replace existing pipe with 430 LF of 42 inch pipe, $0 $0 $614,700 along 1-37 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Sharpsburg Replace existing pipe with 140 LF of 42 inch pipe, 30 of 238 Section 1 along Sharpsburg Section 1 in Allison WWTP $0 $0 $201,600 Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 540 LF of 12 inch pipe, 33 of 238 Zamora 460 LF of 15 inch pipe,along Zamora in Allison $0 $0 $613,100 WWTP Service Area. 34 of 238 Hearn Replace existing pipe with 1850 LF of 24 inch $0 $0 $1,633,600 pipe,along Hearn in Allison WWTP Service Area. Loma Alta Replace existing pipe with 940 LF of 24 inch pipe, 35 of 238 Section 1 along Loma Alta Section 1 in Allison WWTP $0 $0 $828,500 Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 360 LF of 10 inch pipe, 36 of 238 Country Estates along Country Estates in Allison WWTP Service $0 $0 $154,100 Area. Leopard Section Replace existing pipe with 1010 LF of 30 inch 37 of 238 1 pipe,along Leopard Section 1 in Allison WWTP $0 $0 $914,000 Service Area. Loma Alta Replace existing pipe with 740 LF of 30 inch pipe, 38 of 238 along Loma Alta Section 2 in Allison WWTP $0 $0 $669,100 Section 2 Service Area. 39 of 238 Northwest Replace existing pipe with 940 LF of 15 inch pipe, $0 $0 $497,100 along Northwest in Allison WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 1360 LF of 15 inch 40 of 238 Perry pipe,780 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Perry in $0 $0 $1,221,300 Allison WWTP Service Area. Leopard Section Replace existing pipe with 220 LF of 16 inch pipe, 41 of 238 2 along Leopard Section 2 in Allison WWTP Service $0 $0 $141,100 Area. 42 of 238 Main Replace existing pipe with 2600 LF of 16 inch $0 $0 $1,577,000 pipe,along Main in Allison WWTP Service Area. 43 of 238 Stillwell Replace existing pipe with 760 LF of 16 inch pipe, $0 $0 $487,200 along Stillwell in Allison WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 110 LF of 10 inch pipe, 44 of 238 Santa Gertrudis along Santa Gertrudis in Allison WWTP Service $0 $0 $68,700 Area. Replace existing pipe with 1130 LF of 12 inch 45 of 238 Beacon pipe,1430 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Beacon in $0 $0 $1,340,600 Allison WWTP Service Area. 7-14 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Grav to Install 7300 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 149 of 238 Clarkwood South Clarkwood South Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $3,721,800 1 Basin WWTP Service Area. Agnes Install 2500 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 150 of 238 St/Clarkwood Clarkwood South Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $1,063,900 Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 6750 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 151 of 238 Manning Rd Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP $0 $0 $3,249,300 Service Area. Install 1880 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 152 of 238 Grav to Stillwell Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP $0 $0 $1,779,900 Service Area. Grav to HWY 77 Install 5290 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 153 of 238 LS Highway 77 Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $2,158,400 WWTP Service Area. Grav to Lakes NW Install 1830 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 154 of 238 1 Lakes Northwest Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $1,195,200 WWTP Service Area. Grav to Lakes NW Install 2510 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in Lakes 155 of 238 2 Northwest Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $1,154,400 WWTP Service Area. Yellow Oak Ave Install 2120 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 156 of 238 Grav Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $1,331,000 WWTP Service Area. Install 1820 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 157 of 238 Warrior Dr Grav Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $754,200 WWTP Service Area. Install 3810 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 158 of 238 NW Crossing Grav 1 Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $2,754,700 Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 3950 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 159 of 238 NW Crossing Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $5,279,900 Grav 2 Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 3620 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 160 of 238 NW Crossing Grav 3 Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $2,613,600 Basin WWTP Service Area. Nueces Acres Install 3820 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 161 of 238 Grav Nueces Acres Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $5,636,900 WWTP Service Area. Install 3540 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 162 of 238 NW Crossing Grav 4 Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $3,751,400 Basin WWTP Service Area. NW Crossing Install 1140 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 163 of 238 Grav 5 Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $601,800 Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 1580 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 164 of 238 Bronco Rd Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP $0 $0 $671,600 Service Area. Install 8960 LF of new 16 inch gravity pipe in 165 of 238 Grav to Allison Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $6,245,200 WWTP Service Area. 7-15 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Calallen Center Install 11900 LF of new 20 inch gravity pipe in 166 of 238 Grav Calallen Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP $0 $0 $9,305,300 Service Area. Install 8860 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 167 of 238 Calallen East Grav Calallen Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP $0 $0 $3,915,617 Service Area. Grav to Lakes NW Install 2190 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 168 of 238 3 Lakes Northwest Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $1,155,000 WWTP Service Area. Install 1140 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 169 of 238 NW Crossing Grav 5 Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison $0 $0 $5,279,900 Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 1790 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 170 of 238 Erne Street Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP $0 $0 $821,600 Service Area. Install 90 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe in 171 of 238 New Grav Northwest/Hearn Sharpsburg S Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $3,121,200 WWTP Service Area. Future Grav To Install 9020 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe in 172 of 238 Allison Grav Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin $0 $0 $6,022,600 WWTP Service Area. 235 of 238 Lakes NW LS Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Allison $0 $0 $156,300 WWTP Service Area Total 1,282,300 17,633,300 136,066,817 Greenwood 8 of 238 Coastal Meadows Force Main diameter to be upsized to 8". $0 $133,800 $1,906,800 Lift Station wet well upsized from 8'to 14'to 9 of 238 Highway Nine hold an additional 775 gallons controls to be $0 $1,554,400 $1,860,800 adjusted between 2022-2024. Force Main to be upsized from 16"to 20"for between 2022-2024.In ultimate flow conditions, 13 of 238 Sacky(>5MGD) the lift station wet well will require a diameter of $3,039,000 $3,003,700 $9,180,000 20'for an additional 7,400 gallons and pumps will need to be upsized. Replace existing pipe with 440 LF of 10 inch pipe, 61 of 238 IH-37 Access 350 LF of 12 inch pipe,430 LF of 16 inch pipe, $0 $0 $690,900 Road along IH-37 Access Road in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 320 LF of 16 inch pipe, 63 of 238 Carroll 1370 LF of 20 inch pipe,1260 LF of 24 inch pipe, $0 $0 $2,211,000 along Carroll in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 200 LF of 12 inch pipe, 64 of 238 Cresthill 520 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Cresthill in $0 $0 $494,100 Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 4310 LF of 16 inch 65 of 238 Kostoryz pipe,3630 LF of 20 inch pipe,1130 LF of 24 inch $0 $0 $6,987,800 pipe,40 LF of 42 inch pipe,120 LF of 48 7-16 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) inch pipe,along Kostoryz in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Leopard Section Replace existing pipe with 2150 LF of 16 inch 71 of 238 5 pipe,along Leopard Section 5 in Greenwood $0 $0 $1,260,800 WWTP Service Area. Up River Section Replace existing pipe with 3970 LF of 20 inch 76 of 238 2 pipe,along Up River Section 2 in Greenwood $0 $0 $4,845,800 WWTP Service Area. 77 of 238 Alaniz Replace existing pipe with 700 LF of 12 inch pipe, $0 $0 $360,400 along Alaniz in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 390 LF of 18 inch pipe, 78 of 238 Sacky 290 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Sacky in Greenwood $0 $0 $470,400 WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 440 LF of 16 inch pipe, 80 of 238 Camargo 2240 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Ayers Section 2 in $0 $0 $26,700 Greenwood WWTP Service Area. McBride Section Replace existing pipe with 1490 LF of 30 inch 82 of 238 2 pipe,along McBride Section 2 in Greenwood $0 $0 $1,239,400 WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 640 LF of 10 inch pipe, 83 of 238 Neptune along Neptune in Greenwood WWTP Service $0 $0 $267,600 Area. Replace existing pipe with 2200 LF of 36 inch 84 of 238 Old Brownsville pipe,along Old Brownsville in Greenwood WWTP $0 $0 $3,064,000 Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 620 LF of 10 inch pipe, 85 of 238 Omaha 1500 LF of 12 inch pipe,5720 LF of 30 inch pipe, $0 $0 $7,015,400 along Omaha in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 310 LF of 10 inch pipe, 86 of 238 Santa Elena along Santa Elena in Greenwood WWTP Service $0 $0 $137,800 Area. Replace existing pipe with 2570 LF of 36 inch 87 of 238 Saratoga pipe,110 LF of 60 inch pipe,along Saratoga in $0 $0 $3,066,300 Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Grav to LS1003 Install 2830 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 173 of 238 WWTP 2 WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $1,755,200 Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to LS1003 Install 2830 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 174 of 238 WWTP 2 WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $1,444,700 Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to LS1003 Install 3930 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 175 of 238 WWTP 4 1 WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $2,004,800 — Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to LS1003 Install 2720 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in WW- 176 of 238 WWTP 42 LS 1003 WWTP-4 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood $0 $0 $1,154,300 Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to Coastal Install 16830 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe in 177 of 238 Meadows 1 Coastal Meadows Lift Station Shed in Greenwood $0 $0 $2,343,400 Basin WWTP Service Area. 7-17 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Grav to Coastal Install 5300 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 178 of 238 Meadows 2 WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $10,869,600 Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 5030 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in WW- 179 of 238 Future Bates Rd LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood $0 $0 $2,053,600 Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to LS1003 Install 2130 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 180 of 238 WWTP 4 3 WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $978,500 — Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to Highway Install 9370 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 181 of 238 Highway Nine New LS 2 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $3,823,400 Nine 1 Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to Highway Install 3300 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 182 of 238 Highway Nine New LS 2 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $1,401,900 Nine 3 Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to Highway Install 4560 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 183 of 238 Highway Nine New LS 1 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $2,015,200 Nine 2 Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to LS 1003 Install 4160 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in WW- 184 of 238 WWTP 2 South LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood $0 $0 $1,839,100 Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 5300 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 191 of 238 New_Londonl London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $5,638,700 Service Area. Install 3000 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe in 194 of 238 New_London4 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $2,090,900 Service Area. Install 7900 LF of new 54 inch gravity pipe in 195 of 238 New_London5 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $13,301,500 Service Area. Install 2500 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 197 of 238 New_London7 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $8,218,900 Service Area. Install 2650 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 199 of 238 New_London9 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $2,207,600 Service Area. Install 1500 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 201 of 238 New_Londonll London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $2,749,000 Service Area. Install 2370 LF of new 60 inch gravity pipe in 202 of 238 New_London12 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $4,398,900 Service Area. Install 4840 LF of new 54 inch gravity pipe in 203 of 238 New_London13 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $7,812,900 Service Area. Install 6450 LF of new 36 inch gravity pipe in 204 of 238 New_London14 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $6,575,000 Service Area. Install 2450 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe in 205 of 238 New_London15 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $3,829,600 Service Area. 7-18 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Install 6810 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in 206 of 238 New_London16 London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP $0 $0 $4,253,300 Service Area. 221 of 238 New LS to GI—1 Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $659,400 Greenwood WWTP Service Area 222 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $728,700 LS1003WWTP2 Greenwood WWTP Service Area New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in 223 of 238 LS1003WWTP2- Greenwood WWTP Service Area $0 $0 $156,300 South 224 of 238 New LS to WW- Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $721,600 LS1003 WWTP-4 Greenwood WWTP Service Area 232 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $303,400 Highway Nine 1 Greenwood WWTP Service Area 233 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $670,900 Highway Nine 2 Greenwood WWTP Service Area Total 3,039,000 4,691,900 141,086,300 Laguna Madre Grav to Waldron Install 4890 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in New 185 of 238 1A LS to Waldron 1A Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $2,493,300 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 2380 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 186 of 238 Lola Johnson Rd Jamaica Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin $0 $0 $1,050,400 WWTP Service Area. Install 3280 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in New 187 of 238 Yorktown Blvd LS to Waldron 1B Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $1,890,200 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 5720 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in New 188 of 238 Glenoak Dr LS to Waldron 1B Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $2,917,000 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 6510 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe in New 189 of 238 Roscher Rd LS to Waldron 1B Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $3,173,400 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to Waldron Install 2220 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in New 190 of 238 LS to Waldron 1A Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $1,132,200 1A 2 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. 218 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Laguna $0 $0 $2,984,900 Waldron 1A Madre WWTP Service Area 219 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Laguna $0 $0 $455,100 Waldron 1B Madre WWTP Service Area 220 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Laguna $0 $0 $309,200 Waldron 2 Madre WWTP Service Area Install 5250 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 236 of 238 Flour Bluff Rd Flour Bluff Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre $0 $0 $2,410,500 Basin WWTP Service Area. Grav to Waldron Install 2160 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in New 237 of 238 2 LS to Waldron 2 Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $927,100 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. 7-19 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Install 8660 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe in 238 of 238 Grav to Waldron Grav to Waldron Lift Station Shed in Laguna $0 $0 $4,286,000 Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Total 0 0 24,029,300 Oso Wet well upsizing from 13.12'to 24'for an 16 of 238 Everhart/Staples additional 14,800 gallons in ultimate conditions. $0 $41,843,100 $79,560,000 Force Main to be upsized to an equivalent diameter of 36". Parallel a 24" pipe next to the existing 42".A 24" 111 of 238 Nile at this slope could take all flow from the Perry $0 $0 $276,100 Place LS branch. Replace existing pipe with 620 LF of 20 inch pipe, 91 of 238 Airline 1400 LF of 30 inch pipe,3490 LF of 36 inch pipe, $0 $0 $6,014,100 along Airline in Oso WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 790 LF of 24 inch pipe, 92 of 238 Rodd Field 690 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Rodd Field in Oso $0 $0 $1,217,000 WWTP Service Area. 93 of 238 Slough Replace existing pipe with 2300 LF of 20 inch $0 $0 $1,708,000 pipe,along Slough in Oso WWTP Service Area. 98 of 238 River Oaks Replace existing pipe with 320 LF of 12 inch pipe, $0 $0 $198,800 along River Oaks in Oso WWTP Service Area. 100 of 238 Alameda Replace existing pipe with 790 LF of 20 inch pipe, $0 $0 $566,600 along Alameda in Oso WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 1840 LF of 12 inch 101 of 238 Casa Linda pipe,along Casa Linda in Oso WWTP Service $0 $0 $939,200 Area. 102 of 238 Sinclair Replace existing pipe with 1620 LF of 20 inch $0 $0 $1,192,200 pipe,along Sinclair in Oso WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 1170 LF of 30 inch 103 of 238 Staples Section 2 pipe,along Staples Section 2 in Oso WWTP $0 $0 $1,428,800 Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 5430 LF of 24 inch 107 of 238 Kentner pipe,50 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Kentner in Oso $0 $0 $3,915,100 WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 1290 LF of 20 inch 109 of 238 Gollihar Section 1 pipe,along Gollihar Section 1 in Oso WWTP $0 $0 $687,900 Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 350 LF of 20 inch pipe, 121 of 238 Alley(Pvy) 660 LF of 24 inch pipe,700 LF of 30 inch pipe, $0 $0 $1,369,500 along Alley(Pvy)in Oso WWTP Service Area. Replace existing pipe with 1170 LF of 24 inch 127 of 238 Staples Section 3 pipe,5140 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Staples $0 $0 $5,553,300 Section 3 in Oso WWTP Service Area. 133 of 238 Kingston Replace existing pipe with 2790 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Kingston in Oso WWTP Service Area. $0 $0 $3,313,000 7-20 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) Replace existing pipe with 1300 LF of 18 inch 148 of 238 Woolridge pipe,600 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Woolridge in $0 $0 $2,239,900 Oso WWTP Service Area. Install 50 LF of new 6 inch gravity pipe in Everhardt and Staples Lift Station Shed in Oso 207 of 238 New_Oso1 Basin WWTP Service Area. $0 $0 $27,800 Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth. Total 0 41,843,100 110,207,300 Whitecap Upsize wet well from 4.2'to 20'for an additional 3,700 gallons before 2024.Wet well will need to 19 of 238 PI Section 4 be increased to 24'for an additional 2,800 $975,600 $3,226,300 $17,922,700 gallons for ultimate conditions and force main diameter increased from 4"to 18". Install 2830 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 208 of 238 New_Whitecapl Coquino Bay Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin $0 $0 $1,203,000 WWTP Service Area. Install 1600 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in 209 of 238 New_Whitecap2 Coquino Bay Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin $0 $0 $678,800 WWTP Service Area. Install 1310 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in Lake 210 of 238 New_Whitecap3 Padre South Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin $0 $0 $535,400 WWTP Service Area. Install 1710 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 211 of 238 New_Whitecap4 Swordfish Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin $0 $0 $725,300 WWTP Service Area. Install 1410 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in 212 of 238 New_Whitecap5 Verdemar Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin $0 $0 $599,900 WWTP Service Area. Install 890 LF of new 6 inch gravity pipe in To 213 of 238 New_Whitecap6 ModeIMH 124020240 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $395,400 Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 560 LF of new 6 inch gravity pipe in To 214 of 238 New_Whitecap7 ModeIMH 124020240 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $249,900 Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 1180 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe in To 215 of 238 New_Whitecap8 ModeIMH 124020240 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $481,600 Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 1500 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe in To 216 of 238 New_Whitecap9 ModeIMH 124040580 Lift Station Shed in $0 $0 $661,300 Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Install 800 LF of new 4 inch gravity pipe in Zahn 217 of 238 New_Whitecapl0 Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP $0 $0 $1,600 Service Area. 225 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $353,000 Coquina Bay 2 Whitecap WWTP Service Area 226 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $464,600 Coquina Bay 1 I Whitecap WWTP Service Area 7-21 Total Total 2031 Total Project# Project Name Description 2022 Cost Cost($) Ultimate ($) Cost($) 227 of 238 New LS to Zahn 1 Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $512,800 Whitecap WWTP Service Area 228 of 238 New LS to Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $220,300 Verdemar Whitecap WWTP Service Area 229 of 238 New LS to MH Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $308,400 2401 Whitecap WWTP Service Area 230 of 238 New LS to MH Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $245,600 2402 Whitecap WWTP Service Area 231 of 238 New LS to MH Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $354,800 2403 Whitecap WWTP Service Area 234 of 238 New LS to MH Install new Lift Station and Force Main in $0 $0 $482,100 580 Whitecap WWTP Service Area Total 975,600 3,226,300 26,396,500 7-22 Exhibit 1.Wastewater Service Area All lisonWWTP Q o LL� i i. ago Cafaffen Allison / — "� N h ,5 1889 V 44 z 3 z San - groadwayWWTP k Broadway; Ro6stown Corpus Christi Boy clpI P 4L ,ice s Grp eenwood T�51 In ort�s6 169aLondonMLift-`�?a�G, q r Station N 1 4- F Greenwood WWTP� ^, U 4 3 OsoWWTP� U) y a O50 yy^ ,Yr C N-I A rst }�i 0 i Tierra Grande n e ii= 13 -. N Petronda p R London _ Laguna j 'C �, ♦ MadreWWTP � y2 Laguna Madre ah S eeau°° S-1-A,°a �� ath rni�in9 agM 1-6—,i,°a,m°mwam aond y a 0000ao whil;l Au92028 ° AA Whitecap W W TP �g AA 27`� a L3 rh E AA ao 3636 Texas r.opxal Trl TeezaSTraplcal Trl Re<hn E 1.0 ka Exhibit 2.Wastewater Treatment Plant Service Areas Ronk,R IS Z MODRIIV Nueces '£e AllisonWWTP Viola Ingleside on O W 6 the Bay a NSD Q2 ,aa9 uu W o 5 w m 3 ,NORM a� JON .0 ne r 4 BioadwayWWTP NINCAM Robstown. L ?`- Corpus ® c IH _ IIiK Christi wvv � e _ Rn y N Mvi-, MORE. CIn IAirp J j 2 _ 1 - No L -vi w a 1694 V[NVb Y IVIIHII �' VVW�Vv 61 404 tiG� IkO9Lry , 7t� "LIIU a ¢ c a RM'2626 -_ a" f+ 0 892 30 c bdh 665' V VII gGreenwood r r,I v uw„s �t U Xi. Oso W W TP "WWTP Cabo 9� d 7 "e�^v11 IN Gvv Corpus Christi E a �Coyo Naval Air f+ IY Tierra Grande ❑ a iso -ti.n (Q Q �' FM'63 Webev Ra' VVW U Petronlla �, � Gv"GHRVIHv L LONDON � YLaguna MadreWWTP NNIH 20 tl RIHLIN Y N 3 vv rv, Z1 y = V � vv�vHN1IVL�v � �J Wal d Q 5laeon awersM1aas 43ff a VNUVLu Lin S uO Hmtw r L e saeo� ss 'tR TaEiir,gNn ��MMn S d1111 8 vuasevva,er lrea,men,vlam u24 {J�44U—w a 000040 n ba Vrm Main t � / rV'V . Hu92023 _ WhitecapWWTP a. AA y e4 R�,rviSNP w AA —21 36 11Texas Tr.,i Trl Chapman E AA s TexasTropica'�Trl Ranch - - 1.0 za Exhibit 3.Allison Sewershed C nen \' eov`o W Z - e �3 7 �1 H1 >, A OS fffi SHARPS WOODR ER u 6/r CAN ROADLS -- _- LAKES +^* - AIIisonIWWTP 1 NORTHWEST 5 PSBG� �r HIGHWAY 77, S � -�lraaeco-anon-. ALLISON > GRAVITY a. is W arx�ttc ?x as W Z Allison �= - �< O � c 0 L ISOLA a W F 0 Na en D STAT M Z rc m ACRES Lu 0 Ub _ M ,,n^ U R2er V/ ryRPdd.t2 = F YLARKWOOL� L /., O d Vl NORTH, �_ L/), s• GROSSING J V W J STILLWELL /// f erRa � a North San a J`' z4 '• ❑4 Pedro WDAre 2 z Robstown E^Hain ave A� O tr p ins Ra Daunrs sr TH r.9nes st Violet Nr.,.4 w Legentl a 000040 D UVw/fP StlonHceerArea -24 t _ _ Corpus<i,r[ A.92023 =IRSra - © Int'I Aire iii W Watzrheatrn p AA z stlng Force Maln en[ '7AIC rd Rd 0 a qq 9 C=Lft tlon S- hem n ov" Existlng Gravity Pipes Rd ® E AA —12 - Miles t4 � E 1.0 Exhibit 4. Broadway Sewershed 56ft L4 7T� w 9r WW-LS oa 8 vvw .8, BroadwayWWTP LU Had x Z rBroadway` Lu w 0 r—,I —� `5TLI ER LU U) Z rk44W U) 0 U R V YW), , > U 0 Z p .j,pg,t MORGAN a, X< a- Ln X 0 Lu 0 U London Lift NO Stat— amw Alm" N P-Lm" 00004o c= S, 1192021 —ceAr® =215 24 Waltz 7 -pMalo --36 11 gGmviZAICUZ o 1 AA Exisbnt Pipes C3LI—t-S- h- "I.SI AA —12 vI Miles 1.0 Exhibit 5.Greenwood Sewershed +il°' -q LLI d � La �o Lzu MCBRID S HIGH 3 6 � k ry m � NI 0 Hopkl es Rd a i/ir- 9nes Tk4j Et TX-44E W �Xyyy �y) I /j ) z� ° IRP.RT ffW ki3^ cc LU - �I t nt'I A r0or y A °C�i . (� N a )` Greenwood < a Xxz W W Q Rd VIM-1-S-90 F Q C IA M Z COA T lN -LS y Q =LUV W County Road 34 zz9z MEA D 1 0 u o Lond J 0 (� Z Station 7 F OJ J� aa�e �� W V W d s A o u LU m N zzsz W -LS,.37 , V bt 3p - cta Brow^ SACKVMIMI z YtlW �, 665 cowmy ed Greenwood N _- WWTP ,,. KOSTORYZ Legentl `- t' Zi "' � V� a OOOOLO OWWfP S--Area '//Y gyp, \ ` Jar -LRSbtlon 12 (/�/ 1'J Sep 2023 `�`rr AA Was@Wa@rheaMerR Pla —36 'ss Pa nt®AIIXfZ AA w w a OLRSbtlon sewem,e� Existing Gravity Pipes � > AA <- 6 .. tz o c Miles a° Exhibit 6. Laguna Madre Sewershed oW oma po c c L an ss Figld N.sh a st 14ft 4� G,IfWi,d,C,lf C-- -jamb@ A LU T 'IT La U) .na MadreWWTP WALDR LU x z Ra 20A AL F W 5) UFF LU UHAIC LU 0 S TTA q u U Lagunazp. Mad 0 U) LAGk9NA Madre a SHORES skim z 0 Lu U —F,,lhl NEWLST WF LDRON iA ft �A Rfy P,,d A N LL01mg 4 000040 C= S,,—Area =215 24 A.92023 A 36 AA lZAICUZ 0 1 AA C=Lft—,,S- h- Exisbng Gravity Pipes AA Mi1.0 "' Exhibit 7. Oso Sewershed c OL R y o �°enGdf Q W o Landon Lift > y <a Station 0 � r'a,K '�A OsoWWTP za � . i ! Lu X Z �. CH AN �;�^11L6f/alAS *}� W O � WW WW pI�Y/ o st W O R Oso 2 U 5 T -lam °OlfwntlsGulf W U U' W 4,r R41 Weber Rtl _ `d� - Course LT ,^ Z PER RY 0 d (n STATION SWW L i E PLA<:C ww -_ �./ X LAKES 318 /-.^ / / 0 V W WW unry ka zz A LDRIDGE RE FIE1 II + m s arairV Cpunty ad BYT AY 2gq UCKINGHA '° WW Al LINE LFII RO rum � N p 55Iep'es 4" G W W 77 I`'I^xI�I vzz NG j Legentl I WW B OOOOLO GvvvvrP = / a Aug2o2a ALRSbtlonNceA® _ x ..'"77""'7 By Z AA W Pla d si axle Watz�Tr®trnerR >3E' wmrLp wrce Maln ne®Arcuz 0 1 w AA A pLft—,Lsew�,s,e� waid.or,c,eid R. Exis0ng Gravity Pipes ® E AA —12 Miles E 1.0 Exhibit 8.Whitecap Sewershed Gulf W,—Golf Mustang 1,1,,d n V m P,ff Lu e Q2 Qac 4.0 rim `sw At sR Islan Waldron Field ZAHN a 2a f, LU 5 1 D1, A U) x z Tailings �,,/P-1 LU P LU 0 Ln z (J) W Whitecap X U ; PA E CL u 0 Whi ecap Vm9fts < U) WWTP (.) D LU a. X�— Ln X COQUIN 0 w BAY ?IN N -.9-d ^II 9=17SrA P =2175 24 AuJ202s f— song force Maln errt A A 'ZAICUZ 0 1 AA Exisbng GravityPipe� C=Lft—,,S- h- TNiRT&@ "El— AA —12 Miles 1.0 Exhibit 9.Area Development Plans .L - _ 1•."°� .� ,�� ,� yam, _ W ��§� �� ` k �� ' t�~'� � F 'Y�, ..' � - u ' y _ t i. L f ` I I �i p y a f L �Pe L � t � r 4 3J .r _ e y »c 34 y a I w Exhibit 10. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Taft Estes V S If t Pat".. /Ode. 11 WN i LZ Bluntzer ft Aransas Pass Riverside r Ingleside P 0,1 Field 1j i0 lrg!1jide n Pe It Are n... Bey -E R rcho A 3znq.ete L R.b—.n A Cl S, --d Nueces Ln 1XI r. ChristiC,rp,, ,ti L ,so N,v,1 Air 11 Sr V.-gBI.nd X r Drisc.11 Pet,ord, L-do,�' M2� LU u L4— Madre 0 z a. 0 w 0 Bishop rj,,79 JO Texas TroP C— 70 chn Lu -------------------------------------------------- LU fle N Sep 2023 Legend AA CapusChristi ET31-irnits M Lift Statim Sewershed' 0 4 AA Copus Christi City Limits El Waste Water Treat—t Plant AA VAVTP Service Area A LiftStaticin Miles .0 Exhibit 11.Allison System Upgrades for Current Conditions. CD untY Road 1 ' 12G o 0 893 Portland In U K � 37 Dunn/RDad 1126 J' as Calallen Allison 2.96 ft h rous Christi Robstown Broadway Greenwood 37 �8 county Road 1° R e R Oso zsc Laguna Madre n Whitecap \ Wrtcon .,Bayou C allen I � w I - D I I g = I \ �Cynth'ia aRamos < Wood River RlverCanyon z � Up River Road m o ` - Sh`arpsliurg m `t Lakes' �, � AllisonWWTP g Northwest r � -- Highway 77 a as 1889 z _ a pR AI',' Calallen 1I P m V, / A J Allison � Solar Estates tNuecesAcres Hz en D v � /3 Northwest m dao Clarkwood Stillwell 6A a Crossing North c RE, rte.C. n Mai Rtl a Orth San m Jy 24 Pedro N a 1694 69 3 6 D Ave Z z - s Robstown E Main Ave trick Greenwood g Y C� Kansas St & -a w Clarkwood Violet "'Legendo Peak Flow Summary(gpm) South Lift Station Current 16-Year Ultimate Waste water Treatment Plant Clarkwood North 991 1,111 1,514 2 92 Lift Station Clarkwood South 217 261 460 AL No Improvements Needed Cynthia 78 47 47 n A, Requires Improvements Highway 77 1 960 1,999 n Rd Upsize Gravity Pipes Lakes Northwest 14 758 1,632 a Existing Force Main Northwest Crossing 485 818 1.634 _ Q Lift Station Sewersheds Nueces Acres 114 220 436 Q WWTP Service Area Ramos 43 39 39 ad 34 2292 N ®AICUz River Canyon 211 185 185 50n a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Adjust Pump Controls Sharpsburg LS 4,747 5,609 8,850 Solar Estates 143 168 227 Existing Gravity Pipes =lz" Stillwell 241 257 782 Is"-za" Up River Road LS 702 615 615 a -" —27-36" Wood River 314 351 456 0 5,500 11,000 —>36^ De Dietrich - Feet JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Allison System Upgrades for pPAPE-DAWSON DESIGNER RW Current Conditions / ENGINEERS Ecrc o RW u - VRA 1.0 City of Corpus Christi 0'NOPEReR�A� rE—ENGNEERNGFRM� 0 ��'"'�359�� Exhibit 12. Broadway System Upgrades for Current Conditions 11-1 L�" nNLa"x Legend L893 Portland In Waste Water Treatment Plant 4n County Road 2250 - Lift Station �� . No Improvements Needed Calallen Allison . Requires Improvements �r >a Existing Force Main rouS ChriSti RotE(ov n Broadway Upsize Gravity Pipes a 0 WWTP Area Greenwood Q Lift Station Sewersheds ®AICUZ Adjust Pump Controls Nueces Existing Gravity Pipes <_12" Oso 15"-24" A,decc5 27 36 Boy 286 Laguna Madre A —>36" g Peak Flow Summary(gpm) +� Whitecap Lift Station -- 3 Current 10-Year Ultimate Coopers Alley L-Head 4 4 4 Lawrence St-T-Head 11 11 11 ------ Magee Beach 2 2 2 Morgan 659 954 1,068 Peoples St-T-Head 13 13 13 Studebaker 35 47 1 67 North Reach"C" 130 153 221 North Beach"D" 240 256 470 Rincon North im s to g P,rk North Beach"B" 142 151 358 North Beach"E" North Beach E" 45 53 75 Nueces Bay 120 121 121 Rincon South Rincon South 1 1 1 earl °. St North Beach"D" m Rincon North 2 2 2 ;North Beach"C" Cole Park No Data Available No m Brownlee No Data Available g Resaca WW fP No Data Available di gaticn e Fulton Int'I Trade Corrltlor ,,North Beach"B" @(n' jo Port of f_or P., I R�' F , Nueces Bay 4 ort 'orpu Resaeatn<l�� 0 -� - BroadwayWWTP g wgS"r_37-AccesRtl-__ _ i` ti3v m \ Brownlee J m Peoples Street"T"Head Leopard St I _ 1 r.n S ..hr'etr , �Fa 1 Broadway �;;� Lawrence Street"T"Head 5,. y,an Studebaker ;Coopers Alley"L"Head z p` / Hill Z emorinal Par Magee Beach O 'c _ Agnes St - th A Morg�n 34 Cole Park z Del Ma College- st Camp. y6 5` 411,Par t ..St .n?hittieatc, RE � F n e Greenwood ana o �rak•.:av N Lozano Golf 3`1 T. She el Mar Center �° /rOn yr ✓Si Ilege-East (� is 6e/toy Campus as Camp., Horne Ru y h sh zy Oso s �J Lollta St 0 3,000 6,000 m o Greenwood Feet Park JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Broadway System Upgrades for pPAPE-DAWSON DESIGNER RW Current Conditions 1 ENGINEERS Ecrc D RW u vm VRA 1.0 City of Corpus Christi D,N PPERDRDaD TE—EN�NEERN�FRM� 0—D 037E900 Exhibit 13. Broadway System Upgrades for Ultimate Condition 11-1 L�HIL Legend Waste Water Treatment Plant 54 ft 873 Portl�i�d In Lift Station 0 No Improvements Needed . Requires Improvements Calallen Allison • New Lift Station `+ C- rUUS Christi °a a Future Farce Main fohstown Broadway A >a Existing Farce Main Future Gravity Main Greenwood Upsize Gravity Pipes Q Lift Station Sewersheds Q WWTP Area g ®AICUZ Existing Gravity Pipes Oso = I Nueces Bgv 15"-24" g —27-36" Laguna Madre >36-- Future 36"Future Land Use Whitecap Employment 70 Residential z _____________ Peak Flow Summa m Lift Station �9p Current 10-Year Ultimate Coopers Adley L-Head 4 4 4 Lawrence St.T-Head 11 11 11 m Magee Beach 2 2 2 Morgan 659 954 1,068 ^rth 2 Peoples St.T-Head 13 13 13 h Beach"E" Studebaker 35 47 67 Ort / North Beach"C" 130 153 221 Rincon South North Beach"D" 240 256 470 North Beach"B" 142 151 358 North Beach"D" North Beach"E" 45 53 75 Nueces Bay 128 121 121 No g,. !North Beach"C" m Rincon South 1 1 1 g Rincon North 2 2 2 Cole Park No Data Available Brownlee No Data Available .;North Beach"B" i Resaca P No Data Available z Nueces Bay \ uy^y Resaca_ E9 ft - /� BroadwayWWTP r m Brownlee Peoples Street"T"Head r rnus ,_hjI I 1 Lawrence Street"T"Head Broadway;; 1 StudebakerGoopefsAlley"L"Head o e R Magee Beach ., 1 S' Morgan Cole Park C Par F..Phi eater ana N Greenwood (en er Oso 0 3,000 1 6,000 Feet JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Broadway System Upgrades for pPAPE-DAWSON DESIGNER RW Ultimate Conditions I ENGINEERS tCrc o RW u — VRA �.0 City of Corpus Christi o,N PPEReRaan TE—EN�NEERN�FRM� 0 mot 10375900 Exhibit 14.Greenwood System Upgrades for Current Conditions o1GylMNmodelslGlsaiCOCC awi Foci Layouts vruapx 54 ft Legend Manhole elevations need to be inspected by 893 Ponland in Waste Water Treatment Plant City to ensure slopes and inverts are correct Lift Station 37 . No Improvements Required 6R Calallen Allison . Improvements Required �� Upsize Gravity Pipes _ rous Christi 2 RohscoL,n Broadway A a Existing Force Main ®Alcuz Greenwood Lift Station Sewersheds Q WWTP Service Area —__ / Nueces -Adjust Pump Controls / Existing Gravity Pipes Oso <=t2" 0 N 15"-24" 286 Laguna Madre g �27'-36" '�� "r >36" Whitecap 0 � o m 1_ m VP R/Up � 181 Allison Ra A McNorton g y McBnde 4 ��/ `Hi Highway Nine Charlie's `'•;. i�e�oaduva Placei J. z s Rd t — 8 Rd F -pard St 407 20 Corpus Christi A g z sm Broadway m u g Laredo 51EHopkins Rd St ® Mary St `^ Alr ort Tx_e Agne-.t Levi ti gees� Ruth St count ° _ ounty c. P Ec fall z a/°y'�> Morgan Ave h r Cole Amphithea 2 2 PEI Airpor c Louisiana u n ozano Golf Arcadia ay Greenwood c° Rd —� vM EWesatp;int Port/Peary-se' 9 d 2292 Crossing I 4 IS Trojan" Coastal _ Meadows B`awne`Park Rose Acres Lexington 2292 �D 0 81° 5 it 8 �1d Wry oaf/, CA Ca x Al Sacky Osc, mo°FS z t M Greenwood L8J si a ° WWTP � h Peak Flow Summary(gpm) Lift Station Current 10-Year Ultimate Airport 586 475 475 y Kostoryz Arcadia al(>5MGD) 6,1()1 6,1()1 4,1()() s'a, schahe 2a Meadows 197 236 745 � sc° 'e/vd D Highway Nine 1,031 1,178 1,331 - Kostoryz(>5MGD) 11,532 10,530 10,53() r ca nils Pi vT Levi County Jail - 20 20 ° Nas 'gaa/Ld McBride(>SMGD) 7,787 6,900 6,900 m N corpus c Sacky(>5MGD) 4,755 4,797 4,895 v court y Trojan 72 fi0 60 d Weber Rd Lexington 541 54 54 Port/Pearse(>5 MGD) 10,235 1 7,950 1 7,950 �D Charlie's Place Nc Data Available m Rose Acres Nc Data Available 0 500 5,0001%1 10,000 h West oint Crossing Nc Data Available 22 Fe JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Greenwood System Upgrades for PAPE-DAWSON DESIGNER RW Current Conditions r ENGINEERS Ecrc o RW u — VRA 1.0 City of Corpus Christi 0'NOPEReRnADrEXMENGNEERNGFRMA70 ��' L°3'E9oo Exhibit 15.Greenwood System Upgrades for Ultimate Conditions Legend aft Waste Wa erTreatment Plant ultimate Peak 18-9i, P,,r l v,d In New Lift Station Lift Station Flow(gpm) 37 0 No Improvements Required New LS to G1_1 906 - . Improvements Required New LS to LS1003WWTP2 1 325 Calallen Allison . New Lift Station �� =Future Fir a Mal" New LS to LS1003WWTP2-South 275 rPUS Christi Robscooan Broadway —E istin,ForceMain New LS to WW-LS 1003 WWTPA 2.259 Future Gravity Mai" New LS to Highway Nine 1 400 Greenwood Upeas,Gravity Pipes Q Lift Station Sewersheds New LS to Highway Nine 2 1,219 QWWTP Service Area --- ---_ ®AICUZ Adjust Pump Controls O50 Existing Gravity Pipes ° -12" fo A is"-za° Laguna Madre g 286 27"-36' �� fnr/ >36" 1 Tao, y Whitecap Future Land Use e m Employment co''zdo, 70 m z Residential 77 _________-- r � s Allison New LS toQ McNorton Highway ay`// J k' Nine-1�V 4 Highway Nine New 1, a Highway Nine 2� � or;,us Christi m ' Broadway g New L D " to G3 r, � 9 .Levi r nes s: ♦u- e � r m s; County [s a Airport 's a Jail _ �� MogaAve s Greenwood 1 c°le Amphithea 2 2 nt'I Airpor 1- I New LS to I n0 liana n `LS1003WWTP2 ozanoGoli Arcadiaai Ne 41 r WW-LS1003-& j Port/Pearse ( zzsz WWTP-2 South *4 v,.d11 ^ Westpoint Crossing FY New LS to �` �.`' Trojan Coastal WW-L51003 Meadows WWTP-4 NrawnerPark Rose Acres Lexington ^\ zzsz /1 v ptd 8Y4'N OS R wi Ca x Sacky Osoa "'0" z /\ st /Greenwoo� d Greenwood ao r a j WWTWWTP P 71Q, o,_ t„ Peak Flow Summary(gpm( Lift Station Current 10-Year Ultimate Airport 585 475 475htorv` Arcadia(>5MGD) 6,1()1 6,101 4,100 _- �'� =�5 8p"s �n Coastal Meadows 197 236 745 23 � Highway Nine 1,031 1,178 1,331 Kostoryz(>5MGD) 11,532 10,530 10,530 M r Ce nils R a _...... �z Levi County Jail - 20 20 �� Ne, McBride('SMGD) 7,787 6,900 6,900Q N Corpus C Sacky(7 5MGD) 4,755 4,797 4,895 e Courtry Trojan 72 60 60 d We'aer Rd Lexington 54 54 54 Prt/Pearse(>5 MGD) 10,235 7,950 7,950 ,tea Charlie's Place Nc Data Available r' Rose Acres Nc Data Available 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Westpoint Crossing Nc Data Available 22 Feet JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Greenwood System Upgrades for pPAPE-DAWSON IG RW Ultimate Conditions / ENGINEERS ECrc o RW u — VRA 1.0 City of Corpus Christi 0'NOPEReR°A° TEX.EN�NEERNXFRM a,o �'"'�359�� Exhibit 16. London Area Wastewater Planning nous Christi Alli LU rj < ffb in Greenwood Broad,way LU 76 'a, 6- Md Greenwo LU N—Ceswe C.b.,,i.RON Lo 0 Oso Qq L:41 London aF N.s 56-5 Lond n ILa a London_Maydrne- G Zt. ------------------- LONDON Peak Flow Summary(gpm) 8Ig Lift Station Curren[ 10-Year Ultimate West Point Crossing - 900 8905 15 in AcLondon East 108 1315 LS to Oso(estimated) 500 650 7 00 N 10 in TOTAL 500 1 L58 21920 /* London cR-zz U London 24 in 36 in cc a. � a. 37ft London is to be apart of Greenwood and Oso Sewersheds.New Stationwill3 f3 u pump to the Greenwood WWTP along with the West Point Crossing lift stationU) U- 15 in 0 Legend Existing Gravity Pipes(Including London 2021 Model)London Area Future Land Use < u —12" COM 54 in —15"-24" FPC0 —27 -36" Government —>36" Institutional X15 in 01 A London Lift Stations Residential Future Force Main Mixed Use N, CoOC Pipes Under Construction Permanent Open Space Future Gravity Main Transportation ®AICUZ WATER .20 12340 London preliminary water lines E Waste Water Treatment Plant 11,283 021 E=3 WWTP Service Area 15 in--21,in— AA Rodd 18 County 0 1,500 3,000 6,00040ft AA Feet AA 1.0 Exhibit 17. Laguna Madre Upgrades for Current Conditions Legend �1allenAA1111i;s-n ❑ Waste Water Treatment PlantC Lift Station Broadway No Improvements Required Greenwood Improvements Required 1365 a Existing Force Main Upsize Gravity Pipes O50 Q Lift Station Sewersheds Laguna Q WWTP Service Area Madre'Whi'ecap ®AICUZ Adjust Pump Controls et b Existing Gravity Pipes Sd" ,^ f h Oso Ccve 16ft 15"-24" —27"-36" 'Turtle Cove m —>36" ilitary/Jester Rp Walmart ,,Laguna/ - �� MailIre WWTP mo G1, ahs g ngeR R, ^ d o " Waldron Road Gateway Park m A A � Atwood Par m Flour g our Bluff � s " [ Rhetta Place ea kDr urclue Jamaica Laguna Madre yor 0 �'� Spanlant Be a a { a m a Laguna Shores 3 ldron Field z ` 24 ft '�ivieria � Tailings Pond o Rex. e , n Lift Station Peak Flow Summary(gpm) Current 10-Year Ultimate Flour Bluff 647 668 734 Gateway Park 51 48 39 Jamaica 52 61 177 Laguna Shores(>5MGD) 3,946 3,347 3,347 Pita Military and Jester 1,999 1,410 1,410 Island N Purdue 211 197 197 Rhetta Place 169 120 125 Rex 509 422 422 Riviera 1,618 1,383 1,383 Turtle Cove 709 1 540 540 J Waldron 1,6151 1,732 1 1,820 Walmart 101 11 1 28 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Laguna Madre WWTP No Data Available Feet JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Laguna Madre System Upgrades pPAPE-DAWSON IG RW for Current Conditions / ENGINEERS Ecrc o RW u — VRA 1.0 City of Corpus Christi 0'NOPEReRDAGTE—EN�NEERN�FRM� 0 0' 1037E900 Exhibit 18. Laguna Madre System Upgrades for Ultimate Flow Conditions 11-1 L-II VSF aPx Legend Waste Water Treatment Plant �IallenAlllliison Lift Station C ��C'A�s Christi No Improvements Brdwa}! Required Greenwood A p Improvements Required 365 New Lift Station Oso a Existing Force Main Laguna Madre'Whiteca 91.. a Future Force Main � P n Future Gravity Main Upsize Gravity Pipes g Lift Station Sewersheds Oso c e 16ft Q WWTP Service Area ®AICUZ �jTurtle Cove Adjust Pump Controls Military/Jester Existing Gravity Pipes /Walmart <=12.. i / j /� e , '.Lague a / �MadreWWTP — 27-36" g Ls to >36" R7 '-Idron 2 a Future Land Use Waldron Road Gateway Park 3 Employment Residential wo / Atod Par \ 3 g Flour Bluff�� ithetta Place � I Purdue Jamaica +� Laguna Madre row o , o , •• ant T a m na Shores o� "= Idron Field � D New o Waldron • r h Rivieria Tailings _ yy 7/4 Pond c�^`t� %Rex, Lift Station Peak Flow Summary(gpm) Expand wet well at Rex Lift Station Current 10-Year Ultimate Flour Bluff 647 668 734 Gateway Park 51 48 39 Jamaica 52 61 177 Laguna Shores(>5MGD) 3,946 3,347 3,347 Military and Jester 1,999 1,410 1,410 New LiftStation Ultimate Peak N Purdue 211 197 197 Flow(gpm) Rhetta Place 109 120 125 New LS to Waldron 1A 1,541 Rex 509 422 422 New LS to Waldron 1 B 700 Riviera 1,618 1,383 1,383 New LS to Waldren 2 290 Turtle Cove 709 540 540 Waldron 1,615 1,732 1,820 Walmart 10 11 28 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Laguna Madre WWTP No Data Available Feet JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Laguna Madre System Upgrades pPAPE-DAWSON IG RW Ultimate System / ENGINEERS Ecrc o RW u — VRA 1.0 City of Corpus Christi 0'NOPEReR�A� rE—ENGNEERNGFRM� 0 �' 1037E900 Exhibit 19. Oso System Upgrades for Existing Conditions 11-1 L�HIL Peak Flow Summary(gpm) 7 K3 Pornand in Lift Station 'i ai Current 10-Year Ultimate 37 Airline WW 553 997 1,375 -- Anchor Harbor WW 75 248 350 Calallen Allison Bay Drive WW 189 514 550 `r Buckingham WW 328 1,409 1,750 c Cimarron WW 397 464 690 Rohsovvn rous Christi Broadway Country Club WW 924 5,500 5,50D EverhadlStaples 1,802 5,263 8,725 Greenwood Greenfields by the Bay 1,125 1,191 1,325 Kings Crossing WW 350 371 40D Lakes WW 1 460 847 91D Sti Nueces Oleandi 2 1 D 11 Pelican Bay WW 125 121 117 Oso Perry Place WW 1,DOD 1,073 1,125 Schanen WW 795 797 BOD Slough WW D 223 223 286 Laguna Madre g Starry WW - 782 782 2 Station 5WW 3,30D 3,185 3,125 - +� Whiteca z Sugar Tree WW SSD 593 825 �f2 TAMUCCWW 160 168 168 -- 7u Webers Glen WW 875 785 785 Cole u WilliamsWW 15,DOD 14,52D 14,520 Amphithea r _______ Wooldridge 11 WW 31D 471 525 ,'!eander Wooldridge WW 14,280 14848 15 DBD v qui Lozano Golt id oto arkway—, Center S t e9z %- os g h ne Fo. se H m m � o �F �a `o �rsia Greenwood �aor A a g 41 z 286 r`9ti,z TAMUCC Oso aeac _ i oal Golf �x.= COL,_- Ci OsoWWTP 6a ai C�`�n. �9asiyd Schanen �s'aa7e m ` Pelican Bay Cabaniss Field `� Club Country .�.ti a m Na, Williams r y Estates 11 _ � WekiersGlen `'�� SugarTree Oso. ber Rd Perry,Place,,Anchor Habor Station�#5 Dx, Wooldridge a r� ` N' The Lakes %-' Greenfields New force main from Wooldrid a II '\ Airline ByThe Bay+>� g Perry z"Place line.intersection with 4z"line.Rebuild Buckingham Perry Place LS to give County Rd 20A additional head. Legend ti°0y Rd ■ = Cimmaron Waste Water Treatment Plant Lift Stations a " Slough ,Q A Q No Improvements Needed g m vraUN S Staples Sti a o �' . Requires Improvements KR 5g ¢ g Bay.Drive a Existing Force Main � Gro$$In � Pio Upsize Gravity Pipes 91 A . N d�Or ®AICUz y �Starry 7 Lift Station SewershedsLaguna Madre Oso Cr eek Park i rd Q WWTP Service Area Adjust Pump Controls Waldron Fiel' Existing Gravity Pipes -12" _ —15"-24" 0 5,000 10,000 27"-36" >36" Feet 7ailin a Via JOB NO. 12383-00 DATE Mar 2023 Oso System Upgrades for pPAPE-DAWSON IG RW Current Conditions / ENGINEERS ECrc o RW u — VRA �.0 City of Corpus Christi 0'NOPEReRDAGTE—ENaNEERNa11-7o ��'"'�359�� DRAFT 9/18/2022 Exhibit 20.White Cap Upgrades Gulf W,—Golf Mustang 1,1,,d n V m P,ff Lu e Q2 Qac 4.0 rim `sw At sR Islan Waldron Field ZAHN a 2a f, LU 5 1 D1, A U) x z Tailings �,,/P-1 LU P LU 0 Ln z (J) W Whitecap X U ; PA E CL u 0 Whi ecap Vm9fts < U) WWTP (.) D LU a. X�— Ln X COQUIN 0 w BAY ?IN N -.9-d ^II 9=17SrA P =2175 24 AuJ202s f— song force Maln errt A A 'ZAICUZ 0 1 AA Exisbng GravityPipe� C=Lft—,,S- h- TNiRT&@ "El— AA —12 Miles 1.0 Appendix A.Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation LanLockwood,Andrews &Newnam,Inc. Wastewater Treatment Plant. P F() A 17 TIY COV PANY Asset SUBJECT: City of Corpus Christi Master Planning and Impact Fee Study PD Project# 12383-00 Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation (LAN Project 130-10987-000) DATE: August 2023 r�,L C) F.{�� TO: Kim Keefer, P.E. Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. , aGaY(� fA�� p 2000 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78213 �� FROM: Scott Harris, P.E., ENV SP Iti5'S,� 10AUG23 Scope of Services In support of the City of Corpus Christi's Impact Fee Study, Pape-Dawson Engineers are updating / developing master plans for the City's water,wastewater, stormwater, and roadway infrastructure. LAN supported Pape-Dawson by completing this asset evaluation of the existing wastewater treatment plant facilities. This asset evaluation included a condition/capacity assessment of six(6)wastewater treatment plants: Allison, Broadway, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, Oso, and Whitecap. Specific tasks included: • Reviewed previous reports, master plans, permits and other third-party evaluations, implementations of any recommendations from the previous evaluations, remaining recommendations for the previous evaluations, and the ability for the existing facilities to treat current, 5-year and 10-year planned flows and recommended improvements. • Coordinated with City staff to review the Treatment Plant Process & Capacity Assessments. This effort included review of the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan, November 2016. This plan provided estimated flows through 2045. The flows within this report were compared to those being used for the collection system model to determine discrepancies or adjustments to either set of flows. • LAN completed site visits to each plant to meet one-on-one with plant operators to review capacity and condition issues in the existing plants. Overview of Evaluations All the plants have adequate capacity for the 10-year period of this study,although projected flows exceed the 75% threshold at Allison, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, and Oso during the study period. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regulation TAC 305.126(a) requires expansion planning when average daily flow exceeds 75%of the plant capacity. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 1 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Investment in Infrastructure Since the completion of the Wastewater Management Plan in 2016 and the decision by City Council to continue improving the six existing plants, rather than consolidating and constructing a regional plant,the city has invested a considerable amount of capital into each of the six plants. Operations and Maintenance(O&M)costs associated with operating the six plants is roughly$23.3 million (City of Corpus Christi Fiscal Year 2023 Budget),an increase of 28.6%since 2016. These O&M costs include staffing salaries, power cost, hauling and disposal cost, consumable products like chemicals, plant repairs and other miscellaneous daily expenses. Note that O&M costs are not eligible for coverage by impact fees. Increasing O&M costs need to be considered as part of the overall funding plan but would have little influence on impact fee structure. In addition to the O&M budget, the FY 23 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes $39 million in capital projects for the six wastewater treatment plants, including major expansions at Greenwood and Oso. O&M costs are currently funded through utility rate payers while 91% of the capital improvements are funded through revenue bonds. Specific improvements are detailed in later sections of this memorandum. Long Range Requirements The scope of this evaluation includes looking at the ability for the existing facilities to treat current, 5-year and 10-year planned flows, however based on future land use and development projections LAN includes several long-range considerations for the city as part of this memorandum. Longer range projections(more than 10 years from now)are more speculative in nature and tied to future growth and regulatory changes. Potential changes in technology may allow for cost savings utilizing optimization coupled with strategic facility expansion (addition of new concrete tanks, etc..). Optimization provides the greatest opportunity to meet future demands at lower cost. Projecting future flow involved evaluation of land-use and future residential and commercial development in the area. Regulatory changes tend to move towards more restrictive measures such as controlling the discharge of nutrients specifically, nitrogen and phosphorous,that can cause excessive growth of aquatic vegetation and other harmful effects on the environment. Additional regulatory restrictions that could become more prominent in the future include perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and microplastics, although PFAS and microplastics are discussed more prevalently in drinking water forums. Existing Capacity / Conditions Assessments In 2016, the City of Corpus Christi conducted an extensive long-range evaluation (City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan, November 2016) of future CIP and O&M of their existing six wastewater treatment plants (Allison, Broadway, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, Oso, and Whitecap). The alternatives included several combinations of decommissioning existing plants and constructing a large central treatment facility as well as an alternative of addressing existing plant deficiencies and continuing to LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 2 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation operate the six existing treatment plants. Ultimately the decision to addressing existing plant deficiencies was determined to be the most cost effective and practical decision. All the plants are approaching 50 to 70 years of operation and in that time have undergone evolutionary repairs and expansions starting in the 1970s to the early 2000s. Since 2016, capital improvements have been or are in the construction stages at all six plants. Most of the CIP scope included repairs and replacement to aging equipment and structures that has exceeded the useful life expectancy or failed in disrepair as result of the harsh costal corrosive environment. Most of the construction has occurred in the last four-or-five years except for the Broadway plant which involved the decommissioning of the Old Broadway plant and the construction of a new Broadway plant between 2015 and 2018. All six plants are currently in compliance with the TCEQ permits. Wastewater loadings (biochemical oxygen demand [BODS] and total suspended solids [TSS]) were assumed to remain at current concentrations throughout the planning period. Tabulated summaries for each of the plants' major facilities are located in Attachment 1. The figure below shows the locations of the six existing Corpus Christi WWTPs and the appurtenant collection sanitary sewer system boundaries. Two areas are noted for future expansion. The area in red around the London area is planned to be added to the Greenwood WWTP. The area in green south the of the Calallen area is being planned to be added to the Allison WWTP. 'a W 1' n Figure 1: City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Service Areas and Treatment Plant Locations LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 3 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Allison Wastewater Treatment Plant The Allison WWTP facility currently has a capacity of 5 MGD with a 15 MGD 2-hour peak flow. The plant is able to discharge to two locations:the Nueces River or Nueces Bay. The plant was originally constructed in 1966 with a major expansion in 1984 to the current capacity. It operates as a conventional activated sludge process with lift station, screening,grit removal, aeration basins,final clarifiers,tertiary cloth filter, chlorine disinfection, solids pump station, aerobic digester, and belt filter press. The Allison plant has an ammonia-nitrogen permit average daily limit of 4 or 12 mg/L depending on discharge point bay or river, respectively. The Allison WWTP also receives high strength discharges from a meat packing industry in its service area. The high BOD and ammonia-nitrogen loadings from this industry have caused influent loadings to the facility to exceed its original design parameters. The figure below shows the locations of the major facilities/ process components at the Allison WWTP: CHLORINE CONTACT EFFLUEWTFIL7L- - i& I wESTCLAIRrF... �-- .. _..• F':- DEWATERING d SOLIDS HANDLING s T. w h X a PRE�THICNENER L fir"" � r :.STCLAIRIFIER T POST-THICKENER EAST AERATION BASINS IFAS BASIN(PLANNED Y FOR CONSTRUCTION) '4 � ara r� 1 JF ST AE FAT')\E3Ai.:V HEADWORKS e DIGESTERS 'l ■i I I NEW BLOWER BUILDING (IN CONSTRUCTION) Figure 2:Allison Wastewater Treatment Plant LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 4 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Based on the Wastewater Management Plan, November 2016, the facility was rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, had taken its toll on the facility. Capital improvements tied to improving condition and capacity at the plant started in 2017 and are currently continuing into 2023. These improvements involve modifications and improvements to all existing facilities including lift station pumps and piping replacement, anoxic chamber prior to aeration, new electrical control room, new emergency generator, disinfection equipment replacement,tertiary cloth filter,chlorine contact chamber,disinfection system,effluent reuse transfer pump station, and aerobic digester. The most current plant upgrades include replacing clarifier equipment, new aeration basin to increase of aeration capacity with new blowers and fine bubble diffusers and automatic controls on air supply along with a new blower building,addition of an integrated fixed film activated sludge(IFAS) process,and a new volute press for continuous sludge dewatering service. The IFAS process is intended to increase both BOD and nitrification removal capacity. Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant The Broadway WWTP currently has a capacity of 8 MGD with a 20 MGD 2-hour peak flow. It discharges to the Corpus Christi inner harbor. The plant constructed from 2013 to 2016 replaced the original plant built in 1938. The plant operates as a conventional activated sludge process and includes influent pumping, screening, grit removal, four aeration basins, two secondary clarifiers, and UV disinfection. The figure below shows the locations of the major facilities/process components at the Broadway WWTP: W A' C A':IFI=R'.% AF�anr nr.!�nslN� +y M F 4 Y� -1Y a .IF tii1f 1'7h ,W GLAIM17IFIER� lav C-5�lfl Nk HEADWOFWS u_ f Figure 3: Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 5 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation In 2016, the facility was rated as "Very Good" except for the old original effluent filter which has since been decommissioned and no longer in use. Most of the capital improvements at Broadway since 2016 were to correct construction deficiencies that have plagued the plant since construction was completed. Some of the problems reported included leaking joints in the aeration basins and inefficiencies with the new UV system. To address future demands in the service area and possible diversions from other services areas, there are plans to add a third secondary clarifier adjacent to existing clarifiers beginning in FY 2023. Broadway is also the only plant with centrifuge solids dewatering. Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant The Greenwood WWTP currently has a capacity of 8 MGD with a 24 MGD 2-hour peak flow. The plant discharges to La Volla Creek just upstream of Oso Creek. The plant was originally constructed in 1957 as a trickling filter plant with anaerobic digestion. Two major expansions in the 1980s increased to today's capacity and converted to a conventional activated sludge process with lift station, screening, grit removal, aeration basins, final clarifiers, solids pump station, tertiary filter, UV disinfection, anaerobic digester, dissolved air floatation (DAF) thickener and belt filter press. Similar to the Allison plant, the facility was rated as "Poor" in 2016. The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, had taken its toll on the facility. Since 2018 the headworks of the plant has been rehabilitated with new screens and grit removal system. Additionally, a new tertiary cloth filter and UV disinfection facility were recently completed. Greenwood plant has an ammonia-nitrogen permit average daily limit of 3 mg/L. To address future development in the service area, significant capital improvements at Greenwood are planned over the next several years including expanding the plant capacity from 8 to 12 MGD. Currently this project is in planning. These projects would include additional aeration basins, an additional final clarifier, new turbo blowers with fine bubble diffusers and automatic controls on air supply and new RAS and WAS pump stations. In addition, plans are to decommission the existing DAF and two of the existing anaerobic digesters will be converted to aerated sludge holding tanks and a dewatering feed pump facility will be constructed to pump dewatered solids to the existing belt filter presses. In addition to the capital projects to address growth, the Greenwood WWTP should consider addressing flooding from La Volla and Oso Creeks by implementing CIP Project 18070. Recent flooding caused significant damage to the plant. Future improvements should include raising containment walls or berms around key components and on-site drainage improvements. The figure below shows the locations of the major facilities / process components at the Greenwood WWTP: LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 6 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation LIFT S7 CTp[1nI HEADWORKS w. PRIMARY CLARIFIER NO.t rrt.Jx PRIMARY DIGESTER N0.1 Li . ,V PRIMARY, -.-11FIER N07.2 SECONDARY DIGESTER PRIMARY CLAIRIFIER NO.3 PRIMARY CLAIRIFIER NOA SLUDGE ,—,WATERING PRIMARY DIGESTER NCF.2 r UW DISINFECTION PRIMARY DIGESTER NO.3 LFFLUL% IFiLI tl;Sv7'Lr. DIGESTED AIR FLOATATION FINIAL CLAIRIFIER NO.I AERTION BASINS BLOWER BUILDING FINAL CLAIRIFIER NO.2 Figure 4: Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 7 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Laguna Madre Wastewater Treatment Plant The Laguna Madre WWTP currently has a capacity of 3 MGD with a 9 MGD 2-hour peak flow. The plant discharges to the Laguna Madre (Bay). The plant was originally constructed in 1971 with major expansion in 1986 to its current capacity. It operates as a conventional activated sludge process with lift station, screening, grit removal, aeration basins,final clarifiers, solids pump station, chlorine disinfection, aerobic digester, and belt filter press. The figure below shows the locations of the major facilities / process components at the Laguna Madre WWTP: r w CLAI RIF ILHNO, t � � 4 w" CI_AIRIFIER NO.2 �r SLUDGE DEWATERING BUILDING J' , CLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER HEADWORKS y AERATION BASINS 'r LIFT STATION AEROBIC DIGESTER&PRE-THCKNER Figure 5: Laguna Madre Wastewater Treatment Plant The facility was rated as "Fair" in 2016. In 2017 improvements included upgrades to the influent pumps station pumps, piping, and controls. In addition, headworks upgrades included grit removal and bar screen and upgrades to the aerobic digester. Additionally, construction started in 2022 to add a new volute press for continuous sludge dewatering service, replacement of coarse bubble aeration system with fine bubble diffusers and automatic controls on air supply, replacement of clarifier equipment, upgrades to the aerobic digester basins and other miscellaneous plant improvements. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 8 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Oso Water Reclamation Plant The Oso Water Reclamation Plant(WRP)currently has a capacity of 16.2 MGD with a 98 MGD 2-hour peak flow. The plant was originally constructed in 1941 with major expansion in 1982,to the current capacity. It operates using a conventional activated sludge process with lift station,screening,grit removal,aeration basins, final clarifiers, solids pump station, chlorine disinfection, aerobic digester, and belt filter press. Breakpoint chlorination is used to meet the ammonia nitrogen permit limit. According to Corpus Christi Water(CCW),the city is in discussions with TCEQto expand Oso Wastewater Treatment Plant rating from 16.2 to 18 MGD and to implement CIP project 20084A. The figure below shows the locations of the major facilities/ process components at the Oso WRP: I II-T`ITA'.::IN M I -I EA �^.:1K5-ACILI'v ri il ATFL 3LUv r0. TANK TANK NO.I yMWI, SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITY AERATED SLUDGE HOLDING NO.38] AERATED SLUDGE HOLDING NO,4 AERATION BASINS NOHOA- REAREATIN 8A$INS N0.4-6 nl.HA I'.UV k3,ASYNS NO.163 LIFT STATION NQ3 tAI•,IiA'pN BASINS NO.t-3 4i a CH�I•`�;FS-H N;1 1�; in,� Cli3RINE CONTACT CHAMBER N0.394 " CLARIFIER NO 5.8 CLARIFIER NO.1-NOA FUTURE BNR BASIN r� Figure 6: Oso Water Reclamation Plant The facility was rated as "Poor" in 2016. Since 2018 the headworks were rehabilitated with a new lift station, screening, and grit removal system. In addition, odor control and new electrical control room were constructed. To address future development in the service area, significant capital improvements at Oso are planned over the next several years including expanding the plant capacity from 16.2 to 18 MGD and replacement LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 9 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation of the breakpoint chlorination with new biological nitrifying/denitrifying process including additional aeration basins with fine bubble diffusers and automatic controls, air supply with step feed and new centrifugal blowers, improvements to the traveling bridge scum system, improvements to the RAS/WAS pumping system, and modifications to the chemical disinfection to comply with Enterococci regulations. Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant The Whitecap WWTP currently has a capacity of 2.5 MGD with a 7.5 MGD 2-hour peak flow. The plant was originally constructed in 1974 with major expansion in 1991,to the current capacity, It operates using a conventional activated sludge process with a lift station, screening, aeration basins,final clarifiers,solids pump station, UV disinfection, aerobic digester, and belt filter press. The figure below shows the locations of the major facilities/process components at the Whitecap WWTP: 1 `.)I IP? NANDONO FACIII I1Y Y a r RAR c;i:.RFFN rzIJILOiRIG 'I A. y� I I '6U'D;NG NO FUTURE GRIT REMOVAL FACILITY I,. CLkRIFIER NO`. '`"" Figure 7: Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant _.. . LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 10 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation The facility was rated as "Poor" in 2016. From 2016 to 2018 improvements included adding new tertiary cloth filter and replacement of the chlorine disinfection with UV disinfection facility. Recently (2022) construction began on process improvements including upgrades to the bar screens, lift station, new grit removal system, aeration blowers and fine bubble diffusers and automatic controls on air supply, replacement of clarifier equipment, RAS/WAS pumps, modifications to aerobic digester, and addition of new volute screw press for continuous sludge dewatering service. Regulatory Requirements The table below includes the current Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit Daily Average Discharge Limitations for the six treatment plants as required by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ). The TCEQ and TPDES permits are renewed on a five-year cycle. TPDES Permit Daily Average Discharge Limitations Existing BODS TSS* Nitrogen** Enterococci Total Coper Plant Plant Capacity mg/L mg/L mg/L CFU or mg/L (MGD) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) MPN/100 (lbs/day) Allison 5 20 (834) 20 (834) 12 (500) 35 Broadway 8 20 (1,334) 20 (1,334) N/A 35 Greenwood 8 10 (667) 15 (1,001) 3 (200) 33 3 (200) Laguna Madre 3 20 (500) 20 (500) Report*** 35 Oso 16.2 20 (2,702) 20 (2,702) 4 (540) 35 Whitecap 2.5 20 (417) 20 (417) N/A 35 * Suspended Solids **Ammonia Nitrogen *** Discharge levels are reported but not regulated at this time Table 1: TPDES Permit Limitations Plant-Specific Considerations • Biological nutrient removal is currently being added to the Allison, Greenwood, and Oso plants but is not a TCEQ requirement at the other plants. In discussions with Corpus Christi Water(CCW) staff, this requirement may change in the future to where TCEQ may require BNR for more facilities. • Tertiary cloth filters and UV disinfection have been installed at Whitecap and Greenwood. Broadway has UV disinfection and Allison has a tertiary cloth filter but uses chlorine for disinfection. The other plants are using chlorine for disinfection and do not have tertiary filters. • Biosolids management at the five of the six city wastewater facilities consist of aerobic digestion, biosolids dewatering with belt filter press or volute press, and trucking to landfill LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 11 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation disposal. Greenwood is the only plant that presently has anaerobic digesters with DAF thickeners and belt filter press dewatering before hauling to the landfill for disposal. • Nutrient limits for ammonia nitrogen are presently in place at Allison, Greenwood, and Oso. Future Capacity Assessment As part of the wastewater master plan, Pape Dawson Engineers (PD) provided existing, and future (10- year) modeled flows to LAN for consideration for each wastewater treatment plant. Background and Flow Development Efforts to comply with the Consent Decree regarding its wastewater collection system and sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's) are ongoing and have not been completed. This initial work included a hydraulic model with appropriate wastewater generators applied to the collection system. This modeling data, coupled with the water usage data was used to confirm wastewater flow factors. These flow factors were then compared to treatment plant flows and adjusted as required for existing land use to confirm consistent assumptions across all components of the wastewater system. For the purposes of this master plan, it will be assumed that the flow factors include an infiltration and inflow component. The table below includes 2021 modeled flows with projected 2031 flows: 2021 Modeled Flow 2031 Projected Flow Increase in Flows % Increase GPM MGD GPM MGD GPM MGD Allison 2,275 3.28 2,753 3.96 478 0.32 21% Broadway 2,832 4.08 2,982 4.29 150 0.21 5.3% Greenwood* 4,058 5.84 4,814 6.93 756 1.09 19% Laguna 1,556 2.24 1,886 2.72 330 0.48 21% Madre Oso 9,204 13.25 10,498 15.12 1,294 1.87 14% Whitecap 983 1.42 1,177 1.69 194 0.27 20% Table 2: Modeled and Projected (2031) wastewater flows *Includes London Area existing/projected flows TCEQ regulation TAC 305.126(a) requires expansion planning when average daily flow exceeds 75%of the plant capacity. The table below considers 2031 flows to determine if plants need to be expanded to meet TCEQ requirements in the next ten years. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 12 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Expansion 75% Capacity Existing Plant 2031 Projected planning Capacity(MGD) Flow(MGD) Needed? Allison 5.0 3.75 3.96 Yes Broadway 8.0 6.0 4.29 No Greenwood 8.0 (12.0)* 6.0 (9.0)* 6.93 Yes (No)* Laguna Madre 3.0 2.25 2.72 Yes Oso 16.2 (18.0)* 12.15 (13.5)* 15.12 Yes (Yes)* Whitecap 2.5 1.88 1.69 No Table 3: Expansion Planning Needed for 2031 Flows *Future Expansions Considered By comparing 2021 and 2031 plant flows the table below shows the year when plant flows reach 75%and 100%current capacity. Plant/Capacity(MGD) Years to 75% (Year) Years to 100% (Year) Allison /5.0 7.8 (2029) 20.9 (2042) Broadway/8.0 26.6(2048) 46.0(2067) Greenwood/8.0 1.4 (2023) 19.9 (2041) Greenwood/ 12.0 29.2 (2050) 56.9 (2078) Laguna Madre/3.0 4.4 (2025) 13.3 (2034) Oso/ 16.2 2.1 (2023) 12.9 (2034) Oso/ 18.0 5.7 (2027) 17.7 (2039) Whitecap/2.5 17.6 (2039) 42.4(2063) Table 4: Timeframe for WWTP's to reach 75% and 100% Capacity *Greenwood and Oso WWTP's are shown twice in the Table above to illustrate timeframe for necessary expansion if existing capacities were increase from 8 to 12 MGD or 16.2 to 18 MGD, respectively. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 13 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Key takeaways: • The projected 2031 flows exceed the 75% threshold at Allison, Laguna Madre, Oso, and Greenwood (if the rated capacity is not expanded to 12.0 MGD). • Oso, Greenwood, and Laguna Madre will require planning activities within the next few years. Note that Greenwood is currently being planned for expansion. • Flows to Greenwood, Laguna Madre, and Oso are projected to increase the most over the next ten years. • Except for the Oso WRP,all the plants have adequate space for future expansion to accommodate projected future flows. • The Oso WRP is surrounded by development and therefore capacity expansion is limited even though growth in the Oso watershed has potential to be significant. Considerations to Address Growth / Expansion As previously mentioned,the City has made significant investments over the past 6-8 years to address the historic issues of aging and underfunded infrastructure at each of the six wastewater treatment facilities. They have kept up with regulatory driven changes requiring capital investments to meet new discharge requirements as well. Development driven growth has not been an issue over the last thirty years, but projected flows are now starting to impact these facilities. There are two primary ways to address expansion of wastewater treatment plants due to development- driven growth: 1. Build new process trains within the plants or 2.Optimize the plant processes to improve efficiency and capacity. New Construction Adding new structures and unit processes is the more traditional way to increase capacity. Typically, this involves adding process trains. For example, if have two bar screens add a third, if have two aeration basins add a third or fourth and so on. Construction costs for building a new WWTP, excluding property acquisition, is approximately $12/gallon. So, to construct a new 1 MGD WWTP, it would cost around $12,000,000. The cost associated with completing process improvements at WWTP's can vary widely depending on the extent and nature of the improvements. Cost to replace old equipment is usually less than constructing new structures. Whitecap WWTP Example— Improvements at the Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant (2.5 MGD) are currently under construction. They included replacing process equipment, piping, pumps, electrical and miscellaneous structural improvements. The only new construction (structure and equipment) was a new grit removal structure with a stacked tray hydraulically induced vortex grit removal unit,grit pumps, piping, and a grit classifier. Every existing plant process was touched in this construction project at a LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 14 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation cost of around $12,250,000. Therefore, the cost$12,250,000 for a 2.5 MGD plant improvement project is roughly$4.9/gallon, significantly less than$12/gallon for new construction. Below is a table representing potential costs of new construction based on projected FY 2031 flow increases (from Table 2, above) using$12/gallon for cost projecting: Plant/Capacity(MGD) Increase in Flow over Potential Cost for New next 10-years Facility Construction Allison /5.0 0.32 $3,840,000 Broadway/8.0 0.21 $2,520,000 Greenwood/8.0 1.09 $13,080,000 Laguna Madre/3.0 0.48 $5,760,000 Oso/ 16.2 1.87 $22,440,000 Whitecap/2.5 0.27 $3,2401000 Table 5: Potential Costs of New Construction to Address FY 2031 Flows *Note that these potential costs are ONLY to address the increase inflows over the next ten years. Optimization of Wastewater Treatment Plants Increases in efficiency and modifications to existing facilities are ways to increase capacity of the treatment plants without adding new facilities. Optimization is potentially less expensive compared to adding additional structures and treatment processes. Several optimization strategies are listed below but are certainly not limited to: Headworks The headworks of the plant includes the lift station, screening,odor control, and grit removal and typically brings the highest amount of"wear-and-tear" of all treatment equipment because of the constituents of the raw sewage entering the plant. Optimization can include: • Install submersible pumps with VFD and no-clog impellers at lift stations • Update screening technology to minimize maintenance and control odor • Install or improve grit removal systems at each plant. For example —the city is already moving toward HeaclCell multi-tray grit removal at Allison, Greenwood, Oso, Laguna Madre, and Whitecap. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 15 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Aeration There are methods and new technologies to optimize aeration process with the potential of significantly reduced energy costs including: • Provide step aeration or deliver the maximum oxygen where maximum organic source is available (usually upstream area of aeration basin) • Step feed the return activated sludge (RAS) by changing the RAS flow to the tail-end of aeration basins during times of increased flow because inflow/ infiltration helps prevent the wash-out of the biological process. • Configure existing plug flow aeration basins for biological nutrient removal by adding baffle walls and internal recirculation • Add moving-bed bioreactor treatment (IFAS/MBBR) and increase contact surface for biological reaction Clarifiers The city can improve solids capture in the clarifiers by: • Installing spiral rakes to help the capture of settled solids • Install Stafford baffles to prevent short circuiting Solids Handling The city can improve solids handling by: • Implementing anaerobic digestion and renewable energy recovery • Improving dewatering technology through the installation of volute presses, centrifuge, and other continuous automatic operation equipment • Use biosolids for fertilizer or soil amendment Impacts of Future Regulatory Changes Although not necessarily tied to growth, future TCEQ regulatory changes would most likely involve removing nutrients, specifically nitrogen and phosphorous. From the City's Wastewater Management Plan (2016): "The most significant aspect of the treatment requirements evaluation is that all or most of the WWTPs will likely be subject to nutrient limits in the foreseeable future. We are anticipating that moderate nutrient limits would be implemented initially with limits becoming increasingly stringent with time. We would anticipate initial total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) limits of 8 mg/Land 1 mg/L respectively with limits eventually being lowered to limit of technology levels (TN < 3 mg/L and TP <0.3 mg/L). We are anticipating the most sensitive receivers, and the associated treatment facilities, will receive nutrient limits first including Oso Creek, Nueces Bay and estuary, and Oso Bay.This is expected to be followed by the Laguna Madre and Ship Channel over time. The overarching direction of the wastewater industry is towards increased levels of treatment and resource recovery. Newer plants are typically designed to maximize resource recovery LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 16 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation through biogas production and installation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system. We are anticipating the pressure to maximize effluent reuse will continue and anticipate industrial reuse will eventually be implemented. Current EPA regulatory initiatives such as the implementation of effluent viral limits will require increased disinfection limits. The land area requirements for all new plant sites should therefore be sufficient to accommodate these future anticipated initiatives." Nearly a decade after this report was written regulating nutrient discharge limits in Texas has still been slow to gain traction especially in costal environments like Corpus Christi. Opportunities for Effluent Reuse The City of Corpus Christi (City) has used wastewater effluent for non-potable reuse since the 1960's. The Greenwood WWTP and Oso WWTP have pump stations and piping used to convey wastewater effluent to holding ponds at the near-by golf courses but that is really the extent of current use. The city presently reuses approximately 3%of the total wastewater effluent and would like to increase not only the quantity of effluent reused but also find better uses for the effluent through increased potable and non-potable distributions. A study completed in 2019 by LAN, "Wastewater Effluent Feasibility Assessment" intended to further evaluate the feasibility to increase wastewater reuse from the Broadway, Greenwood, and Oso Wastewater Treatment Plants. The feasibility assessment intent was to building upon previous reports and recommend a staged approach to increase the use of effluent wastewater. In looking at the feasibility of reusing effluent, emphasis was placed on using existing facilities as much as possible. Including the existing piping and pumping facilities at the Greenwood and Oso WWTP's as well as using existing City-owned property. Each plant has unique advantages and disadvantages regarding effluent reuse. Alternatives for improving the reuse program from the Broadway, Oso, and Greenwood WWTP's were developed considering the following: • Potential reuse market—industrial, irrigation, commercial, domestic • Storage alternatives - existing or new • Distance from the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project • Distance from the Water Treatment Plant • Effluent flow available for reuse • Effluent characteristics: BOD,TSS, TDS, nitrogen, pathogens Eight primary alternatives (below) for reusing effluent were presented in this report. Benefits and disadvantages for each alternative were also presented to aid in determining their viability. Seven additional alternatives were analyzed; however, LAN found that these alternatives were non-viable and not considered any further. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 17 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation • Alternative B1—Further Treat Effluent at Broadway and Pump it to a Central Tank • Alternative B2—Further Treat Effluent at Broadway and Pump it to a Future Desalinization Plant • Alternative G1—Store Existing Effluent at Greenwood and Pump it to a Future ASR Project • Alternative G2—Pump Existing Effluent from Greenwood to a Central Tank • Alternative G3—Store Existing Effluent at the Greenwood WWTP for Distribution • Alternative 01—Store Existing Effluent adjacent to Oso for distribution to TAMUCC • Alternative 02—Store Existing Effluent adjacent to Oso and pump to Nearby Development(s) • Alternative 03— Expand the existing system for use at Bill Witt Park and Del Mar South Campus Recommendations LAN recommended the City of Corpus Christi implement the alternatives above in a phased, programmatic approach. Near term improvements could include: • Completing a revised, comprehensive Wastewater Effluent Master Plan and Improving Effluent Reuse Planning & Policies • Improving Inflow& Infiltration (I&I)issues in each basin but most importantly the Broadway Basin • Implement Project 02 with the intent of expanding the system in the long-term to implement projects 01 and 03 • Implement Project G3 with the anticipation of expanding the system (Project G1) in the long-term to provide effluent to the Aquifer Storage and Recovery(ASR) project Conceptual Level Opinions of Cost (2019) for Near Term projects were: • Project 02 - $3,719,040 • Project G3 -$1,850,000 Long-term recommendations include: • Following implementation of Project 02, the system can be expanded easily to provide effluent to TAMUCC (01) and to the southside, Bill Witt Park and Del Mar College South Campus (03). • After implementing Project G3, expanding the system to provide effluent to the Aquifer Storage and Recovery(ASR) project, the part of the long-term development of that project. • After investigating and addressing I&I issues in the Broadway basin, consider Project B1 or B2, depending on how much progress is made with other City alternative water delivery methods, such as desalinization. Summary of Conclusions from 2019 Effluent Reuse Assessment It is evident through this feasibility study that the City of Corpus Christi has policies in place ensuring they have a fresh and safe water supply, well into the future. Water costs may not be excessive for commercial or industrial users at this time, but future demand will only increase as industry develops, and costs must flex to more demand. The Regional Water Plan includes diverse strategies to meet future demands, including additional effluent reuse. Along with policy revisions and implementations, several near-term and long-term investments are feasible to increase not only the quantity of effluent reused but also find better uses for the effluent through increase potable and non-potable distributions. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 18 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Proposed Capital Improvements Based on the existing conditions and existing/future capacity assessments presented in this memorandum, the following are active and proposed capital improvements for the six wastewater treatment plants. A detailed summary of all projects, opinions of probable costs, and expenditure schedules are included in Attachment 2. A summary table of CIP projects, active and proposed for the ten-year CIP which shows which projects are maintenance related,capacity related,combined, proposed time frame,total cost, and cost related specifically to capacity expansion is included in Attachment 3. Active Projects The following are active projects currently underway but not yet completed.These projects address long- term maintenance issues and improve capacity either through the process optimization techniques or new construction: • Allison WWTP Process Improvements & Lift Station Upgrades • Broadway WWTP Plant Rehabilitation • Broadway WWTP Third Clarifier • Greenwood WWTP Electrical Improvements to UV System • Greenwood WWTP Flood Mitigation • Greenwood WWTP Process Upgrade (DAF and Odor Control) • Laguna Madre WWTP Rehabilitation • Oso WRP Aeration Coarse Bubble Process Improvements • Oso WRP Process Upgrades & BPC Facility Decommissioning • Whitecap WWTP Improvements The total cost of active projects in the WWTP CIP (prior+ planned) _ $269,996,184 The total cost of active projects over the next ten years (through FY31) _$217,355,657 The portion of these projects that address long-term maintenance improvements= $98,105,211, or 45% The portion that addresses plant capacity improvements or expansions=$119,250,446, or 55% Proposed Projects The following are proposed projects to be implemented over the next ten years. These projects are not included in the city's current CIP but based on our review of the existing facilities and interviews with CCW staff. Similar to the active projects, each project addresses long-term maintenance issues and improves capacity either through process optimization techniques or new construction: that would improve capacity for each plant and better facilitate growth in the service areas: • Allison WWTP UV Disinfection Improvements • Broadway WWTP Filtration Improvements LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 19 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation • Greenwood WWTP Plant Expansion • Laguna Madre WWTP UV Disinfection Improvements • Oso WRP UV and Filtration Improvements The total cost of proposed projects over the next ten years,to be included in the WWTP CIP= $87,330,000 The portion of these projects that address long-term maintenance improvements= $12,955,000, or 15% The portion that addresses plant capacity improvements or expansions= $74,375,000, or 85% A summary table of CIP projects, active and proposed for the ten-year CIP which shows which projects are maintenance related,capacity related,combined, proposed time frame,total cost, and cost related specifically to capacity expansion is included in Attachment 3. Diversions to Address Capacity Constraints The above projects will improve capacity at each of the plants however it must be noted that the Oso Water Reclamation Plant is constrained from growth. Presently the Oso WRP is the largest plant on the system and projects focused on process improvements could improve capacity, but the plant is surrounded by development and any future expansion to the property is limited. Greenwood is the second largest plant and has significant land for expansion. In discussions with Corpus Christi Water, the long-range plan is to expand Oso up to the site limitations and divert extraneous flow to Greenwood. Greenwood could be expanded to meet any future WWTP demands. The city has the flexibility and infrastructure in place using the Arcadia Lift Station to divert flows from Broadway or Oso to the Greenwood WWTP. Long-Range Projects to Address Ultimate Growth The above active and proposed projects address growth over the next ten years, however, below are three expansion projects that the City could begin planning for to address ultimate growth within the service areas. Begin Planning for Expand Plant for Plant Expansion (Year) Ultimate Growth in Service Area (Year) Laguna Madre 2025 2034 Whitecap 2039 2063 Allison 2029 2042 Table 6: Long-Range Expansions LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 20 of 21 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Summary and Conclusions • All the plants have adequate capacity for the 10-year period of this study, although projected flows exceed the 75%threshold at Allison, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, and Oso during the study period. • TCEQ regulation TAC 305.126(a) requires expansion planning when average daily flow exceeds 75% of the plant capacity. • Since the completion of the Wastewater Management Plan in 2016 and the decision by City Council to continue improving the six existing plants, rather than consolidating and constructing a regional plant, the city has invested a considerable amount of capital into each of the six plants. • Development driven growth has not been an issue over the last thirty years, but projected flows are now starting to impact these facilities. • Adding new structures and unit processes is the more traditional way to increase capacity however optimization of the plant processes is less expensive compared to adding additional structures and treatment processes. • The Regional Water Plan includes strategies to meet future demands, including additional effluent reuse. The city has opportunities to increase not only the quantity of effluent reused but also find better uses for the effluent through increase potable and non-potable distributions. • The city has $119,250,446 worth of active projects (already started) and $74,375,000 in proposed projects to be completed in the next ten years to address plant capacity improvements or expansions. Technical Memorandum Attachments: 1. Wastewater Treatment Plant Summaries 2. Wastewater Treatment Plant Proposed Capital Improvements LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 21 of 21 LanLockwood,Andrews .&Newnam,Inc. Attachment P F() A 17 TIY ('0V PA NV WWTP Summaries Allison WWTP Summary Item Value Preliminary Treatment Bar Screens Number of Units 3 Width, ft 3' Manufacturer Vulcan Industries Grit Removal Grit Pumps 2 Hydro International HeaclCell 1 Hydro International Teacups 1 Hydro International Classifiers 1 Lift Station Number of Pumps 3 Types Submersible Pumps Secondary Treatment Existing Blower Building Number of Pumps 4 Pump Use Two (2)to Digesters Two (2)to Aeration Basins New Blower Building(In Construction) Number of Pumps 7 Pump Use Two (2)to Digesters Five (5)to Aeration Basins Aeration Basins Number of Units 9 Dimensions ft West Basins: 77' L x 33' W East Basins: 72' L x 15'W Sidewall Depth,ft West Basins: 15' East Basins: 13 Secondary Clarifiers Number of Units 2 Diameter, ft 92'to Wall 40'-10"to Scum Baffle LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 1 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Side Water Depth, ft 10'-6" Secondary Sludge and Scum Pumps Numbers of Units 4 Two (2) Per Clarifier Pre-Thickener Number of Units 1 Diameter, ft 55'to Wall Side Water Depth, ft 9'-6" Post-Thickener Number of Units 1 Diameter, ft 55'to Wall Side Water Depth, ft 9.5' Digesters Numbers of Units 5 Dimensions, ft (each) 70' L x 30'W Side Water Depth, ft 13.25' Tertiary Treatment Effluent Filters Number of Units 2 Type Cloth Filter System Dewatering&Solids Handling Dewatering Number of Units 2 Existing Type Ashbrook Belt Filters Future Type Volute Screw Press Disinfection Type Chlorination Chemicals Used Sodium Hypochlorite Sodium Bisulfite LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 2 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Broadway WWTP Summary Preliminary Treatment Bar Screens Number of Units 3 Width, ft 3' Grit Removal Grit Pumps 2 Hydro International HeaclCell 2 Hydro International Teacups 2 Hydro International Classifiers 1 Lift Station Number of Pumps 3 Types Submersible Pumps Secondary Treatment Blower Building Number of Pumps 2 Aeration Basins Number of Units 4 Dimensions, ft 190' L x 25' W Secondary Clarifiers Number of Units 2 Diameter, ft 100' Secondary Sludge and Scum Pumps Numbers of Units 4 Two (2) Per Clarifier Digesters Numbers of Units 2 Dimensions, ft (each) 135' L x 21' W Dewatering&Solids Handling Number of Units 3 Existing Type Centrifuge Dewatering Disinfection Type UV Disinfection LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 3 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Greenwood WWTP Summary Item Value Preliminary Treatment Bar Screens Number of Units 3 Width, ft 3' Manufacturer Vulcan Industries Grit Removal Grit Pumps 4 Hydro International HeaclCell 2 Hydro International Teacups 2 Hydro International Classifiers 2 Lift Station Number of Pumps 10 Types Submersible Pumps Secondary Treatment Primary Clarifiers Number of Units 4 Diameter, ft 36' Primary Digesters Number of Units 3 Diameter, ft 41' Existing Blower Building Number of Pumps 4 Aeration Basins Number of Units 5 Dimensions, ft 70' L x 17'W Secondary Clarifiers Number of Units 2 Diameter, ft 55' Digested Air Flotation Thickener Numbers of Units 1 LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 4 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Dimensions, ft (each) 52' L x 12'W Tertiary Treatment Effluent Filters Number of Units 1 Type Cloth Filter System Dewatering&Solids Handling Number of Units 2 Existing Type Ashbrook Belt Filter Press Future Type Volute Screw Press Disinfection Type UV Disinfection LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 5 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Laguna Madre WWTP Summary Item Value Preliminary Treatment Bar Screens Number of Units 1 Width, ft 3' Manufacturer Lakeside Equipment Grit Removal Grit Pumps 1 Hydro International HeaclCell 1 Hydro International Teacups 1 Hydro International Classifiers 1 Lift Station Types Submersible Pump Secondary Treatment Aeration Basins Number of Units 3 Dimensions, ft 100' L x 25' W Sidewall Depth,ft 14.5' Secondary Clarifiers Number of Units 2 Diameter, ft 85'To Wall Side Water Depth, ft 13.5' Secondary Sludge and Scum Pumps Numbers of Units 4 Two (2) Per Clarifier Pre-Thickener Number of Units 1 Diameter, ft 33.5' Side Water Depth, ft 12.5' Aerobic Digesters Numbers of Units 5 Dimensions, ft (each) Digester 1: 99' L x 14'W LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 6 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Digester 2&5: 22' L x 19' W Digester 3&4: 42' L x 19' W Side Water Depth, ft 14.5' Dewatering&Solids Handling Number of Units 1 Future Type Volute Screw Press Disinfection Type Chlorination Chemicals Used Sodium Hypochlorite Sodium Bisulfite LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 7 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries • • WWTP Summary Item Value Preliminary Treatment Bar Screens Number of Units 4 Width, ft 3' Manufacturer Vulcan Industries Grit Removal Grit Pumps 4 Hydro International HeaclCell 4 Hydro International Teacups 4 Hydro International Classifiers 2 Lift Station Number of Pumps 6 Types Submersible Pumps Secondary Treatment Blower Building Number of Pumps 12 Aeration Basins Number of Units 4 Dimensions, ft 177' L x 30'W Side Water Depth, ft 14' Reaeration Basins Number of Units 6 Dimensions, ft 177' L x 30'W Side Water Depth, ft 14' Secondary Clarifiers Number of Units 8 Diameter, ft 2001 x 52'W Side Water Depth, ft 14' Secondary Sludge and Scum Pumps Numbers of Units 16 Two (2) per Clarifier LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 8 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Aerated Sludge Holding Tanks Numbers of Units 3 Diameter, ft (each) Two (2) 76' Dimensions, ft One (1) 155' L x 46' W Dewatering&Solids Handling Number of Units 4 Existing Type Ashbrook Belt Filter Press Disinfection Type Breakpoint Chlorination Chemicals Used Sodium Hypochlorite Sodium Bisulfite LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 9 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Whitecap WWTP Summary Item Value Preliminary Treatment Bar Screens Number of Units 2 Width, ft 3' Manufacturer Lakeside Equipment Grit Removal Grit Pumps 2 Hydro International HeaclCell 1 Hydro International Teacups 1 Hydro International Classifiers 1 Lift Station Number of Pumps 3 Types Submersible Pumps Secondary Treatment Existing Blower Building Existing Number of Pumps 3 Future Addition 1 Aeration Basins Number of Units 2 Dimensions, ft 76' L x 19'W Sidewall Depth,ft 17'-6" Secondary Clarifiers Number of Units 2 Diameter, ft 70' Side Water Depth, ft 11' RAS WAS Sludge Pumps Numbers of Units 4 Aerobic Digesters Numbers of Units 2 Dimensions, ft (each) 97' L x 35'W LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 10 of 11 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 1—WWTP Summaries Side Water Depth, ft 14' Dewatering&Solids Handling Dewatering Number of Units 2 Existing Type Andritz Belt Filter Future Addition Type Volute Screw Press Disinfection Type UV Disinfection LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 11 of 11 ockwood,Andrews Newnam,Inc. Attachment 2Law LEO A QALY COMPANY WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Project Name: Allison WWTP Process Improvements Lift Station upgrade City Project; E10043(Short-Term) Treatment Plant: Allison W1VTP Status. Active Note: This larOject is cur'rent7y act'Ve a'i:J i3 p mir, ig t:J be camplGted by 2:123, Dcs.crifp6on anri C t rolnw arr,based on Corpus Christi's Capital Impievernent Luilpets for rhea last four(4)Years, The scope Includes replacing p 8nt ir`t stal,on, msta�im, IIAS sti�stem In the west ae"r;Ion basin,ane rep c in,east and west aeration basins,two final olarlfiHrti, :3`JtorT1 ri{I[;bZiG{Y.';JSh fi I[ t,hforine �,r;nlarl r,mr .6j!r, riiSiJJPp rti QTJ 3ytiiE+n, of IiJe;71 rJ.U.';r. transfer pump station,aerobic dip:ester, belt cress buildin t, blower building and pother r^scellar;eous items. 1 he in-plementaticr of this project wlll significantly irnlirov� 11 ,:1rf-:;":tn,ent eftFc!lv�3�7-.:{Lind r d.�c,F pf-!rliri Vr�i<iti[rn5. MM This project provides upgrades and replacement of worn-out equipment and replaces breakpoint chlorination for nitrification with a biological proews. Current Year Expenditures Priar Years 2021 202 ♦ 1 Total CanstructionlRehab $aoprDOO U.100,000 $7,158,056 $4,OOO.aOC} $18,058,06+6 -resting $50,004 MOM Inspertion $80,000 $120.000 31150,t O $350,000 De s=g n $1,450.000 S50A00 $1,500,000 oMingency $A81,000 S-5l'0.`locl $319MC $100.000 $1,510,000 Engineering Svc& Admin. 5; 6 Citi;i: S143000 ;11:1:1:iDu Reimbursement 5350.000 Total $2,731000 $6,8M.OQ0 67,641,OB6 34.350,OD0 $21,808,066 The implementation elf this project will ensure normal operations of Allison WWTP and potenWIly reduce,operational casts, LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 1 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital M • Project blame: Broadway WWTP Plant Rehabilitabon f City Project: 18084 tShort-Term} Treatment Plant: Broadway WWTP Status: Active Note: This project is currently active and is planning to be completed by 2024 Description and Cos: below are based on Corpus Christi's Capital lunprovement Budgets for the last four(4)years, v r r The project addresses construction deficiencies that have plagued the plant since construction was completed in 2016 including abnormal displacement of aeration basin wall, aeration blowers,clarifier equipment corrosion.SCADA system, and others. FXeCl-tion of this protect wi;i extend the life of the treatment plant and improve operation efficiency to meet operational and regulatory requirements. Current Year PriorExpenditures FConstructionlRel}abd,$Qp,O $750,000 $g55Q(}pp sting $50.00f) $50,000 pection $100,000 $50,000 $150,000 sign $934,316 $65.hR 1 $50000 $1.050,000 Contingency 550.+700 S-16D.0091 $-K,000 $560,GN Engineering Svc& Admir7 555138 $:10.000 $$1000 $115,136 ResrnotirsemeM Total I Sol "-',t ri`.t:s 1 1 C 1.,00 1 $860,0001 $7.475,138 Impact/Other Upon completion of this project additional maintenance uv,: Lf:tlnrw,,i t,., ti theSA,In[Provements LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 2 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements Project Name: Broadway WWTP Third Ctarrfier City Project: 21001 (Short-Term) Treatment Plant: Broadway WWTP Status: Active Note" This projects currently active and is planning to he completed by 2025 Description and Cost below are paged on Corpus Christi's Capita improvewent Budgets for the last four(4)years. nee more clarifier is needed to provide operational flexibility and redundancy for routine inspection and maintenance. `Che ant presently has two existing clarifiers. In addition the old blower building will be demolished. r addition of a third clarifier increasers plants capacity and process flexibif il. Current Year Expenditures Prior 121 2022 2023ti 1Total ConstructionfRehab 54,800,000 $2,400.000 $7.240,000 Testing $30,004 $34,000 Inspection $120.000 580,000 $200.000 Design $150.000 $4-0,000 $750,000 $940.000 Contingency $20.000 $75.000 $480 000 $240,000 $815,000 Engineering Svc& Admin. $50.000 $50,000 $30,000 $34,000 $150,000 Reimbursement otal $01 $0 $2%0001 $875.006 S5.470-0001 S2,75OX01 $9.345.000 Upon completion of this project additional maintenance costs will be budget to maintain these improvements. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 3 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital r ■ Projed Name: Greenwood WWTP Electrical Improvement_ to UV system City Project, E10150 Treatment Plant; Greenwood WWTP Status: Active Note: Tnis prDlecl is currently active and is planning to be cornp1w.ed by 2023 De-scrintion qnd Cos; Lelow are based on Corpus Cllr"r>°:i'%Caplt:�I Iipro..o m::rtI P-!ir}gets for the Fasi. four(-I) ucnr:, This project provides neww UILra,.io et rUVi a 3intectien s}stens at the Ureerkvood 'Aa s-ewater TreaVrP i 7t PIa!7TP}t.0 r37eet or exceed the existing eftluofil.lirrli°L;sc:,r Prtt;ro(,o(,c i o ic-.tc,ria Fvtiic,tr 1;;writ at 3: CFUi100 ml,Add iliti,r II'i. tht! F:rc,jc-t:t IF-clIJCJ new tertiary filter basin ups€ream 3`the propoEed UV.system. This project is needed to rn4,(1--t r,pf,,ratic)n.11 .i rid r(,--tul;,[ore' '[:oi.iirc;rnc'.rts, wid r.F:lsu s,s ,,err-yr1%-rua1 r.tq;iiprnvrll Current Year PriorExpenditures Construction/Rehab $450,040 $5,540,040 $5,990,000 Testing $20,000 $20,004 Inspection $80,000 $80,000 Design $596,675 $596,675 roliti:7uen(.,a $528,277 $528,277 L-r ire,P-nn7 Svc Ar.tmin. $95298 fie-r urscnic•rt $95,298 T�aul1 $4u0 01)0 �5 --V-,,X!0 S-I 320,251 $0 $01 ti� $7,310,251 • Operational impact on the electr cal usage will increase with additional higher intensity hulbs but the effect should be nominal. Fallure to complete pro}aot wuld r(,:sult in TCr-Q ad[T1 1 °:+'OtiVe sanctions, LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 4 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation AtachmentI—VVVVTPProposedCapita| |mprovements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements Projert Name: Greenwood WWTP Flood Mitigation City Project- 18070 Treatment Plant, Greenwood WWTP Status. Active �uireir.ly active aaa is planning to be Ivy '1`02a are based a ty tri disirrect and meter '.he I ovefrows lo La 'valla Creek. The objecLive-; Lr), lhi� The Gre at leas bili pco,fecl are to construct co:st-effi,.i-1-1r.1,I IoDd proot -i.,,,.- irrij�,,ovements and i9stal p�ant backup qeneratoF ta keep the normal his project s to Dratec�process and elac[Tia, 13f�Lliptroiir "'will flooding hazard. 11�Projc_clt "to Dmrot(Dc Current Year Expenditures Prior Years 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Testirg $0 7spection $0 Engineering Svc& Admin. 34:1,000 $1009000 Reimbtirsernent $470.000 Tatial $01 6441,13D71 _-_.Z 111.0001 S4,RO,0001 51.200,M01 $G,563.3n Work will reduce potential flooding in lh(�plaril and minimize efiforcement actlions by Texas Commi,;sion on Environmental LAN Project No. 130'10987'000 Page 5of16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements Project Name; Greenwood WWTP Process upgrade (OAF and Odor Control) City Project: 16069 Treatment Plant- Greenwood W'Vl tP Status: Active Notu: This praiecr. .s curreir_Iv active and is p13nning to be Wrnpi€iwii t?/ ')C)23 r f)(,m:riptlnn ji id Cf)r;t bfilow Ve based ren 47nrp„=, f',I7r Sri'R{''agnitnl Imprnvgmpnr RiAgpt5 fnrtha Ia�t four(4)ycar�. This project is to provide process upgrades, replacement and reh�Lbil°tatian of.he exishnq Grep-iwo3cl Wastewater Tre , r11r; t Plant treatment units The City staff has been working ofi overall ;auric PpiuA(Rr: iyr- of Irr:,:lrrrent pw:'e->r., upgrades.The whole project scope may include elr r Iolivr,inG the existing primary clarifiers a;ic nl aeration t)a51n+dr:itin,r_. replacing the existing coarsr:bubbte aeratinn ,vilh inn bubUlr; ae-if".it:)r'•, in-aAling oile i'evv iii o! ck1 i fief, a-i I ik; r.:,w T-,%, distriihution channel to the threr. final cars=irr=.converling Primary D,gc� for Nos. 2 and 3 frim enarmb c, ligeMors tr sludge holding tanks,replacing the C'i�is:fIvF!i. Air Floiauori fhickei'ier iDAF r,'J ir, t'lrt'e fgtryr%,dl'Lr') th'1ickene`s. :and the belt filter preases wit-i srrr,,a r' 'voli.,tc pres7,e5 Comsidering t]1.cgc' availob, ty, rhr~ whr,;� pra;ic-r:t vvi i be div dc.c. into phases and completed•rditi'iin aoproxir-.ately 8 :r S. r This prvjecl is deeded ha r 14?r l: .:t_t�Y ilir:il:.i1 a1 J r��ul,i tf� } 1 r1.,lrtr 1an1.4. Current Year Experiditures Prior Years 2021 2022 2023 "224 2025 Total ConstructionlRehab 53,145,930 $18,210.000 $17,350,000 $34.705,93fJ Tasting $0 Inspection $500,00C $500,000 $1.00{I.00:n Design $667,675 Cr 0,0.000 ylr1 010rL $1 Irll`ll �I 1 �{i Ji T,17 Eng ineeriricg Svc llrlrili, ul"U'U"J l $:14Y.600 $20u.U00 =Lit 000 v1LD.r r ii Reimbursement .31 11�' 1 Total $i7 Ct124.22 $3,571,W I �,26.9;c -19._1 is i:0;. 51721(,.rl *_ • This prolecl will extend the Ille of treatment plant, impr;:•vt;c4fi:,:r�nry of operation and lower overall costs, LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 6 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements Project Name: Laguna Madre WWTP Rehabilitation City Project: 18086 1'reatment Plant: Laguna Madre WWTP Status: Active Note. This project 7s curren''ly active and is planning to be completed by 2023- Description and Cost belaw are ;used an Corpus Chr st,'s Capita+ Improvement Budgets for the last four (4)years- This project included renovation of the existing main office building rep:aring the existing portable office building by a neva office building, improvements on the existing electrical and mechanical equipment at various structures including upgrades from diffused air system to fine bubbles at aeration basins, rehabilitation of thickener equipment,clarifiers,chlorine contact chamber,sludge holding tank and polymer system, etc. . This project is required to meet operational and regulatory requirements,and replaces the temporary trailor office with a permanent facOty. Current Year Expendilures Prior Years 2021 2022 2023 2024 ■ . Construction/Rehab $2.3&4,00© $2,200,000 $8W'000 $5.464,000 Testing $0 Inspection $0 Design $124,902 $412,421 $537,323 Contingency $0 Engineering Svc& Ad,nin $29,576 $317,424 525.000 Reimbursement $372.000 Total $0 $2,538,478 $2.929.845 $805,000 $8.373,323 Impact/Other Upon completion of this project additional maintenance costs will be budget to maintain these improvements. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 7 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements NOWf}rojrsnl tame: CSO vtrRP Aeration Coarse Bubble Process City Project: 200.348 Tr.,.,;lnc'11 PIar71.: C)SO VVVVTP j± N tli Status: Active prolan. is E lonninq !c, I)e ry ,.rr-..:.1q.. t.,. ��I.'2.', 4 f}.' ',?I.`f)-.h, ::7:. ',;:-:ed r, L uti uk f 711L I ?`.C'-Ir 0 Description The proposed Irnprovemants arc to replace the 40 yaar old diffusers in the li RAISIWAS,and Clarifier 1-8 Effluent channels which are worn out, broken and no longer capable of delivering air as originally designed. 'these improvements have been expeditad as a separate stand-alone construcharl packaUe to address the mass urgert upfront issues and ease the construction of Oso WRF Phase 11. r��W o meet operational and regulatory requirements. Current Year Expenditures Prior Years 2021 2022 2023r2025 Total ConstructionlRehab $2,874,KQ $1232,10f) $4.107.005 Testing $20,000 $20,000 Inspection W.000 S35.00r) S85,OOtl Fe'sign $ 50,000 $250.0013 Contingency $287,490 $123,210 $414,700 Engineering Svc& Admin, SU,UUt7 520.000 Reimbursement Total $3.632,3m $1',410.310 CIL ;t..'.0 ThiS projeca will enable,thrt Qfir3 WRP In °I,.1 - a, r{,(",0:If11"'(,,l! ,H; 'l :off;:.kf I I,'.. n rr C;;7: r}I:•: I .z; ;}:ir:l ir;.:a°: -r--:: affected when alant Is not working at v;.?Irnal LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 8 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements Project Name: OSO WRP Pr000as Upgrlade &BPC Facilikv Decommissioning City Project: 20084A Treatrverir ;'rant' OSO 4 VITP slillutt Ar.iivc* Note: This project iv lurremiy active ard 13 piannirig la be compll-.ed rev 2023. C:c�s? bel{,n �-ls:�se!1 r n l Zl„Jus Christl'-� Cs In;uro.,ripen, Buc.ge;s'o. th'a ast four{4) ye%Ar;i. F CDn5truction of new heE;(N orks,,inf1 lift station at Osa W r r�o�:lrlrrat,ori F'iFin; f',VRP) st;irkr.d ir-� FY �i Tt-.e n4:xl h]rlsJ":l c:'or work involves seeondari treatment alprove'nen'"s and a pfccess ccriveraion to B oba�cal NukriGnit r5crr, w' (BNR) Th s will allow the Clk}P LO d a:orxlr i ,ir,ll rllrr('nl )�e s€r1;Jin1 r,n!f:r l 11 lti'.I' (S�{f�'} }'St':11'1 1d17S(:h'u 14{'lirrG'rltl'f' i.I C:hll{.?}Jlrl{j arllfTlr)rll;7 r('I7)f]V;71 11 chr=mical a ditiarl and will all : raiant to main--sir. oar°. r,in11::; ,�7r.? bp' unlo�il ct ammania mcry efilcienlly and sa"el_4 tnrcul h t ir;It}clir.sl processes. hi JLIL�il ort. with secondary treatmem 111111= Pave exceeded 1,'t 1.1 1 desl'3n life aric have �e^'vc-re-main!ensince in-.en2ivc and _1 hindrance to lhl°'Irl{? }IJh:°i,I 1 �1l?r i3tl"�f'I {,ti1Lll�.}I1 M'1'1 "sirSIrl{ aeratic1n basil wa Is for Increasea Cemri co lstruc:t: Y1 : {I"Y= :<'il'I:""111:111''.1. I'CI`I'aCen"lent 01' rellablllt3t'i011 Df eXISW1q SCLlrn Ind >IaJitC�E; rt}rTIL]l49 [:r:,lrll]{3f iL'llt.`s f}rl tie=.1,:C P'1doI L,:I�JrI('I L'rti, imp[overnent3 -o chlorine contact ch ambers to a-lC'ess short cirClllJri.q, de11"icllilCl' Cev'7111mis31C'r11n��t breakpointcl"I'7rlr'atlCn Syslel17:il id ',Yth err1114;ti;{:IaI,{aw} 'l it-!:3f'ce"Ieil.4;As,, -.x:i:il {i vJl 1 artrl llf7o!'>Ir:i t:'v L' boildirlfg, Lligi,.siers ell is aect;, rfmkis.TI improvements will 1ncrease.tre olOnts caoaeitr,from 16MG1.) to 16 ts'GD ronsistency willlh!r Corrlpre[lesrisive Blain:P011c:y+ ..'I!i: :{:'il- I:•{1 -.'a: '1 ' 'S' li, ,l. �,; '+''t J '.{ ;![:° "'.E:Jt°.li?r p'I al"r, Current Year 2021 2022 ConstructiorfRehab 510,000'.000 $$24.000,000 $24,000,OU0 $58,000,000 Testiing $50,0017 $50.000 Inspection $150,000 $280,010 $280.000 $710.000 Design S I.s00°000 $150,00L' $100,000 $100,000 $5,850,0110 ConC+ngency BO�,Q d 1,920,0 [} $1,9ZU'VOU $4,640.000 Engineenrlr &j;: , Admin. . ci70 v1000ilrl 51(1;1.;);>0 $50.000 Rerrnbur'semer%t S,527.5QO Total $5,777.500 $11,250['Cl': 520, I:O7.7Cn $26.350.000 569.777,500 a This project will enable the Oscj'% Rr- to 1,611 ill a Inure e-c?JrlLamical @111 tri iealt 0)311• r. Jr r a°.icxlal I03pact Is adversely affected when pl,,;nt is not working LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 9 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital I Project Name: VVhrEeGap N1WTP Improvements t City Project_ 23037 Treal"ment Plant; OSO VVVffP Status; Active Note: This vroject is currently active-3,)d is planil rlq 16 ;se coinpieted L=_v 202r ,C1.f �f,,,Iow ore bw7c'd an Cnrpus; Cllr1a`I S C al.-Ifa71 1'I �]rC'dC'T'ie;nt Buagets for 7111;laS':four (4) yQ--e S. Construction includes upgrades to the *3er screens. lift stat on.new grit errova! 3yStem.aeradD:-I bloc;ers aild fine 'jubble diffusers and automalic cortilrels wi air Lm[,ply. re.)I Ci-.Me'il of Oari'IF-r e�]L,prTIF.-nl, RAS.-VVAS [1�Irrlps, iviobi{Ir:ajtious IQ aerablc digester, and addition of new volute press for co ntinL,0us e Ii..c1:ie de),vatering servive. This proj�rnieededr+eet operational and requlato- reg4,orEments. Current Year Expenditures PriOr Yea FS 202112024 2025 Total Cons,ructioniRehab $1,500,000 $5,000,000 S5 000-400 1,116,77 $12,816,727 Testirg $0 Inspection $163,600 x1$3.600 Design S1.000,0134 $1,050,000 $2.050.004 Contingency �U Engineering Svc Aamin. Paimbx,uneiir X82+791 $144,710 X163,500 3 (-'16K 578,073 5012.074 bti�l St] $1,062,091 $2,694,710 $5,163,600 $5,163,600 $1,358,440 $15,442,401 There is no projectedops -s'-N1 I'1 : I;r::jr:r.. .it °I a ivie. Upoi r;c1mpletio-f of this project additional maintenance v;!I 1)e.. I?llr4gc-to _'salm nir' ncc':c. +'l'r j:ri"'f,:�"-.ryl,. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 10 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Project mama:ANlrsan Wv's+fF" UV C]isinfection + ` Improvements Treatment Ranh_ Allison WWTP 4 Status: Proposed Note: This project is a friture recommendation for the City of N 1 G 1 it r Corpus Christi by Lockwood. Andrews S Newnam. 41r '.... he stupe Includes adding a UV diw riffic:lion I in i I:,ihf, phini p ric,r::sw t- rc,ph(i ( uic car jl;Brig .tiler•i:3kinn chi:>ir is ,ki Irl �y4k�m A life Cycle aost compariso-1 i7C'wcien [;I'erii?,al ,imi u1V r; ski c-dijr' sho.ild be Pnic-nii;il Firci c:r.9 ..oSt estimate is presented bellow. Expenditures 2026 2027 2025203D 2031 Totil ConstructlonJRehab $1350,000 $1.350.000 S2,704.()00 Clesign (10-15%) $650.000 $950,0011) Contingency(15%) $-300,000 $300.000 S600,00D Engineering Svc& Admire. Reimbursement $350,000 $MG.00O $350.000 $1,05C.GOO Total 10 $Ti 1 $o $1,000.0001 "$2,MO,000 1 $2.0C'0.0101 $5.000,000 - Project would be apart of the continuation of short range projects E'0043 LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 11 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements ImprovementsWastewater Treatment Plant Capital Project Name. Broadway WWTP Filtration improvements � r Treatment Plat, Broadway WWTP Status: Proposed Note- This project is a facture recommendation for the C ty of Corpus Christi by Lockwood,Andrews&Newrrana. The scope includes adding a tertiary cloth filter unit to reduce the total susepended solids dicharging from the plants process Justification The implementation of this prrjp , _ _e toatal suspended solids in plant effluent and reduce cast for disinfection. ■ 2030 20:31 Tolcil Construction/Rehab $1 356.000 51.350,000 52,70ra nn�a Design(10-15%) $650,000 rtingenCy(15%) , 9()[?,qt!% $: 010 3600.000 1--gineering Svc& •rain. Reirrib.irsemerit $350,000 S'�SO, 00 $350,0+00 an taps a continuation of short range proicct 18084 &21001 LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 12 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital w - Project.Name: Greenwood WWTP Plant Expansion Treatment Plants Greenwood WWTP Status- Proposed Nate: This project is currently underway and is expected to last for 8 years. For more information refer to short range project 18069 t� This project is to provide process upgrades, replacement and rehabilitation of the existing Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant treatment units.This project is the continuation of the short range project 180619 which is currently rn a design phase. MOMM Expenditures 2026 2027i ConstructionlRehab $6.550,000 52,300 0,00 516.375.000 $16,750.000 $16,750,ODO $52.725,000 Design so Contingency(15°la) $1.200,000 $450,DOO $1,875.oDO $3,000,000 $3.000.000 $9,525,000 Engineering Svc& Admin. Reimbursement $250.000 $250,000 $250.000 $250.000 $250,000 $1,250,000 Total $8,000A00 $3,000.000 512,500.000 $20.000,000 $20,000,000 $63.500,000 LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 13 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital ! 1 Project Name: Laguna Madre WWTP UV Improvements Treatment Plant: Laguna Madre WWTP Status Proposed Note This project is a future recommendation for the City of Corpus Christi by Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam. Description The scope includes adding a UV disinfection unit to the plant process to replace the existing chlorination disinfection system. Justification A life cycle cast comparison between chemical disinfection and UV disinfection should be evaluated. Potential project cost estimate is presented below. ExpendOures 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 ConstructioniRehab $1,350.000 $1,350.000 $2.700,FO—O Design(10-15%) $650,000 $650,000 Contingency(15%) $300.000 $300.000 $600,000 Engineering Svc& dmin. Reimbursement $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1.D50,DDO Total $0 $o s0 $1.000,000 $2,000,000 i $2,000,000 $5.000,DD0 Project would be apart of the continuation of short range projecls 20086 LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 14 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements Project Narrre; { C3sn WRP l_iV andl^iltr&tion Improvements Treatment Plant: OSO 1NWTP Status. Proposed Nott!: This s a future recommendation for the Cite of C(c,- uk,C,mn-,o by Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam. a'- The scope includes adding a LJV disinfection unit to t1ir=p1tini pro},oss io re trl:.a;:e,: 11-c;ex°;rinR rhlorin[aiion (Iis411'e:lion systern.and adding a tertiary cloth filter unit to reduce the-otal SeIsepenced solids di;harging from the -,lints nrocess_ Continuation of short range projects 20084A� 20r-64B. In farldit on to thc: plonnod, Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR)and decommissioning of the current breakpoint chlorination BPC)s:wst@rn. the imple,rvntitk n of a tertiary cloth filter and UV disinfection will further reduce total suspender; k,,li.s <ard .iota ntir h sat+g, cost it thc:plsan;w process for disinfection. Expenditures 2026 2G27 2028 2029 2030 2031 To ka$17.550,000 $3,650.000 $3,650,000 $24,650,000 Design(10-15%) 5100,400 $1.100,000 $1,200,000 Contingency (15%) $270,000 $700,000 $700,1}00 $1.670,040 Engineering Svc& Admin. Reimbursement $80,000 $400,400 $400.400 $4(10,000 $1,280,000 Total I 618,000.000 S0 $01 S1.500,M01 $4,750,0001 $4,750,OW $29,000.400 Project woubd be apart of the continuation of short range projects 20084A. LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 15 of 16 Master Planning & Impact Fee Study Wastewater Treatment Plant Asset Evaluation Attachment 2—WWTP Proposed Capital Improvements CapitalWastewater Treatment Plant r Protect Narne WV1+TP SCANA Improvements Treatment Plant. All Six Plants Status. Proposed Note: This project is a future recommendation for the City of Corpus Christi by Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam. The scope includes upgrading all six wastewater treatment plants SCALA systems. Ctuatoy SCADA system provides real time monitoring and remote process control. Expenditures 126 2021 20281 ConstructioniRehab $300.000 SWUM $300.000 $900.000 Design(10%) SI) Captial Equipment $1,100.000 $1,100.000 $1.100,000 S3 300i COO Engineering Svc& Admin.Reimbursement $100,000 S100.000 $100.000 Total 1 S1.500,00ol $1.9m000 $1.500.oOO $0 $0 $p S-1,900.(7;)0 • Project would be apart of the continuation of short range projects 18062 LAN Project No. 130-10987-000 Page 16 of 16 Attachment 3 Lan Lockwood,Andrews &Newnam,Inc. Summary of WWTP CIP A LEO A QALY COMPANY Summary ofWastewater Treatment Plant Capital • Project WWTP CIP Project Costs 10-yr WWTP Cl P Costs CIPTotal Yr Complete 10-yr Cost 10-yr Cost Project# Plant Project Name Prior Yr Spent Current FY25-FY31 %Maint %Capacity (Maint) (Capacity) E10043 Allison Lift Station Upgrades&Process Imps $ 16,608,066 $ 4,956,818 $ - $ 21,564,884 FY24 50% 50% $ 2,478,409 $ 2,478,409 21001 Broadway Plant Rehabilitation $ 1,059,200 $ 8,330,000 $ 7,630,000 $ 17,019,200 FY25 959/ 5% $ 15,162,000 $ 798,000 25016 Broadway Third Clarifier $ 550,000 $ 6,330,000 $ 9,190,000 $ 16,070,000 FY25 0% 100% $ - $ 15,520,000 18087 Greenwood Flood Mitigation and Back-up Gen $ 517,166 $ 904,410 $ 14,208,329 $ 15,629,905 FY27 95% 5% $ 14,357,102 $ 755,637 18089 Greenwood WWTP Process Upgrade $ 4,177,882 $ 15,000,000 $ 57,000,000 $ 76,177,882 FY26 50% 50% $ 36,000,000 $ 36,000,000 18086 Laguna Madre WWTP Rehabilitation $ 5,468,323 $ 150,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,618,323 FY31 75% 25% $ 3,862,500 $ 1,287,500 20084A Oso Process Upgrade&BPC Facility Decom $ 5,777,500 $ 15,450,000 $ 66,960,000 $ 88,187,500 FY27 25% 75% $ 20,602,500 $ 61,807,500 20084B Oso Aeration Coarse Bubble Upgrade $ 4,732,390 $ 212,100 $ - $ 4,944,490 FY24 100% 0% $ 212,100 $ - 18087 Whitecap WWTP Improvements $ 13,750,000 $ 1,034,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 19,784,000 FY31 90% 10% $ 5,430,600 $ 603,400 $ 52,640,527 $ 52,367,328 $ 164,988,329 $269,996,184 $ 98,105,211 $ 119,250,446 Summary of Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Improvements (Proposed Projects) Project WWTP CIP Project Costs 10-yr WWTP Cl P Costs CIPTota l Yr Complete 10-yr Cost 10-yr Cost Project# Plant Project Name Prior Yr Spent Current FY25-FY31 %Maint %Capacity (Maint) (Capacity) 25016 Greenwood WWTP Expansion $ - $ - $ 65,000,000 $ 65,000,000 FY31 0% 100% $ - $ 65,000,000 23037 Oso Operations Center $ - $ 500,000 $ 3,080,000 $ 3,580,000 FY25 100% 0% $ 3,580,000 $ - New Allison UV Disinfection Improvements $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 FY31 50% 50% $ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 New Broadway Filtration Improvements $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 FY31 50% 50% $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 New Laguna Madre UV Disinfection Improvements $ - $ - $ 6,250,000 $ 6,250,000 FY31 509/ 509/ $ 3,125,000 $ 3,125,000 New Oso UV Disinfection&Filtrations Imps $ - $ - $ 29,000,000 1$ 29,000,000 FY31 509/ 509/ $ 14,500,000 $ 14,500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 86,830,000 $ 87,330,000 $ 12,955,000 $ 74,375,000 Total Active and Proposed WWTP 10-yr CIP Total 10-yr WWTP CIP(Maintenance Projects) $ 111,060,211 Total 10-yr CIP(Capacity/Expansion Projects) $ 193,625,446 Total 10-yr WWTP CIP(Current to FY31) $ 304,685,657 LAN Project No.130-10987-000 Page 1 of 1 Appendix B. Lift Station and Force Main Data Recommendations for Pump Operations Operating Range Per Pump(ft) WW base elevation vs. Basin Lift Station Setting elevations(ft) 1 2 3 pump offsetting(ft) Allison Clarkwood N WW base level 29.05 5 Current Given settings OFF 34.05 34.05 2 5 0 3 Proposed ON 36.05 39.05 Changed settings OFF 32.05 32.05 3 5 0 ON 35.05 37.05 Allison Clarkwood S WW base level 13.99 3.5 Current Given settings OFF 17.49 17.49 6 9 0 2.51 Proposed ON 23.49 26.49 Changed settings OFF 16.5 16.5 6 9 0 ON 22.5 25.5 Allison Cynthia WW base level -1.43 2.33 Current Given settings OFF 1 0.9 0.9 0.33 0.67 0 2.5 Proposed ON 1.23 1.57 Changed settings OFF 1.07 1.07 0.67 1 0 ON 1.74 2.07 Allison Highway 77 WW base level 59.28 2 Current Given settings OFF 61.28 61.28 2 4 0 2 Proposed ON 63.28 65.28 Changed settings OFF 61.28 61.28 3 5 0 ON 64.28 66.28 Allison Nueces Acres WW base level 43.63 5 Current Given settings OFF 48.63 48.63 1 3 0 2.52 Proposed ON 49.63 51.63 Changed settings OFF 46.15 46.15 1 3 0 ON 47.15 49.15 Broadway Coopers Alley L-Head WW base level -5.09 1.5 Current Given settings OFF -3.59 -3.59 2.5 1 0 2.5 Proposed ON -1.09 -2.59 Changed settings OFF -2.59 -2.59 2.5 1 0 ON -0.09 -1.59 Broadway Lawrence St.T-Head WW base level -5.12 2.33 Current Given settings OFF -2.79 -2.79 1.17 2.17 0 2.5 Proposed ON -1.62 -0.62 Changed settings OFF -2.62 -2.62 1.17 2.17 0 ON -1.45 -0.45 Broadway Magee Beach WW base level 0.68 2.42 Current Given settings OFF 3.1 3.1 0.58 0.25 0 2 Proposed ON 3.68 3.35 Changed settings OFF 2.68 2.68 1 0.67 0 ON 3.68 3.35 Broadway Morgan WW base level 9.81 3.5 Current Given settings OFF 13.31 13.31 13.31 2 4 5 2.5 Proposed ON 15.31 17.31 18.31 Changed settings OFF 12.31 12.31 12.31 2 4 5 ON 14.31 16.31 17.31 Broadway Studebaker WW base level -7.79 4.5 Current Given settings OFF -3.29 -3.29 3 2 0 2.5 Proposed ON -0.29 -1.29 Changed settingsOFF I -5.29 -5.291 3 2 0 ]ON 1 -2.29 -3.29 Operating Range Per Pump(ft) WW base elevation vs. Basin Lift Station Setting elevations(ft) 1 2 3 pump offsetting(ft) Laguna Madre Laguna Shores WW base level -8.25 3 Current Given settings OFF -5.25 -5.25 -5.25 2.5 3 3.5 2.5 Proposed ON -2.75 -2.25 -1.75 Changed settings OFF -5.75 -5.75 -5.75 3 3.5 4 ON -2.75 -2.25 -1.75 Laguna Madre Military and Jester WW base level -4.7 3.5 Current Given settings OFF -1.2 -1.2 2.5 2.5 0 2.5 Proposed ON 1.3 1.3 Changed settings OFF -2.2 -2.2 3.5 3.5 0 ON 1.3 1.3 Laguna Madre Rex WW base level -8.5 1.2 Current Given settings OFF -7.3 -7.3 2 4 0 2.5 Proposed ON -5.3 -3.3 Changed settings OFF -6 -6 2 4 0 ON -4 -2 Laguna Madre Riviera WW base level -12.25 3.5 Current Given settings OFF -8.75 -8.75 -8.75 1 2 3 2.5 Proposed ON -7.75 -6.75 -5.75 Changed settings OFF -9.75 -9.75 -9.75 2 3 4 ON -7.75 -6.75 -5.75 Laguna Madre Turtle Cove WW base level -5 3 Current Given settings OFF -2 -2 3 5 0 2.5 Proposed ON 1 3 Changed settings OFF -2.5 -2.5 3.5 5.5 0 ON 1 3 Laguna Madre Waldron WW base level -23 4.5 Current Given settings OFF -18.5 -18.5 -18.5 3 6 9 2.5 Proposed ON -15.5 -12.5 -9.5 Changed settings OFF -20.5 -20.5 -20.5 5 8 11 ON 1 -15.5 -12.5 -9.5 Oso Country Club WW base level -11.45 6 Current Given settings OFF -5.45 -5.45 -5.45 3 4 5 4 Proposed ON -2.45 -1.45 -0.45 Changed settings OFF -7.45 -7.45 -7.45 4 5 6 ON -3.45 -2.45 -1.45 Oso Perry Place WW base level -9.75 3.5 Current Given settings OFF -6.25 -6.25 1 11.12 8.12 0 2.5 Proposed ON 4.87 1.87 Changed settings OFF -7.25 -7.25 12.12 9.12 0 ON 4.87 1.87 Oso Everhardt and Staples WW base level -7.14 5 Current Given settings OFF -2.14 -2.14 -2.14 7.01 4.01 2 3 Proposed ON 4.87 1.87 -0.14 Changed settings OFF -4.14 -4.14 -4.14 6.28 5.28 4.28 ON 2.14 1.14 0.14 Oso Station 5 WW base level -10.33 4 Current Given settings OFF -6.33 -6.33 -6.33 3 4 5 3 Proposed ON -3.33 -2.33 -1.33 Changed settings OFF -7.33 -7.33 -7.33 4 5 6 ON 1 -3.33 -2.33 -1.33 Allison Service Area Lift Stations C—M H.— —li, AV-1.11- P, OF REM IT, 2 25 15.2. 11.2. 2.11 l.il -2 2-- 0 1000 01 1 2 125 125 125l 1-5 12.15 ..11 l- ill 1,2.1 =5.l 5 Il. — 125l i 12 2l25 5 21.5 il'i l.25 2 2 l Q==11 1- 112. 5 2l25 2- ll, -2 2 2 211 11 12 2 Ell 1 tp . =I it 2 2 '6�=� �2�� !J— l ,l Ej E �,597m% 2,1 M"m Ultimate How 11,11, AV-1.11.1 P""' Up— P�' ,',"PP F. U.Pls�,.' "..'2— =1 =2 I'- 1-d 2l25 M, F— p (it) IFF(i) ��I) P-f- 1,880 M".=h —.7 152l l5 �E�25 515.95 15l� 295162 22" 2.66 —.5 �5f 2-9 7 f 52 1 52 5 52 2 5F 1 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 5 7,1 —1'46t 15- 7.9 �7 �7 1.57 5l g%77 _9 67 ll 21 21 1.1 61.2. 2 2 1 1,5 1- l l, 66.- 6-�5 Im 176 1,9 1,6,2 2 625 12. 9 1,K6 Ilmll '16 — Il.61 1 wo "I m 5,1-9 9 9 57� 121 11 -1 1 -1 1,95 1 1 1,121 1 Ell!Ell Ejl 2h== � 7, 1 6ll - 25l 1. 159 17� AT T, 1 2l 79. 9� 6 7� 57 21 795 5,9 9 25�� 1' 175' 175' 175' l 7�7 1 1.7 1 1 2l25 1 227 El 5 E2 25 25 .5l 76, 6 .5 6,5 7 2 6'9 9 E2 i 92.15 1 1 7 f 2 4� —1 5, 2,6" E75 75 75 792 2 5 d LI 9�6 6 5 1�7 2 'l "l 5 2 21� 2 7l" 1 9 56 565 2 i —----------- �l' l JP�Elf 6 5 6, 7 5� 5 6 5 [j l� 9 —1) 2— 2l,725_.L6 2,1 E�]E]IE E . 5 Broadway Service Area Lift Stations Current Flow I—P I—P I—P P' AVO��I Av�aI .0 t a�a 0 ,'I' 1-1, 11— 1-11— Hill 11— (g,) p F "A b P'0 ... V' 't" d,, ,F,, F F F F 11— (0) (ft) ° (h) f k f ft.0) 'g, sail P-f— (ft-O) I lg� 1 (0-0) F.IF F.F, IF 1- 11-1 111.FF 1- 11F 11F —F I-I 1-1 17 1101 —F 1— F.- I I I I -7 IOF.FF F.- I 11.11 1 FM 1� 171 IFOI .1 —1 11 Ll 7 2 F.I. 'FF 1�2�2 �2�21 Z 2 �.2 -2fl i2 222i 'F 122 122 LI MIN222 2 7 �12 1 �2 1 09 F9 �2 z 22 1 –�o m 1 2�o 1 1 Z21 b F� OF ,2 F. 1 7 92 271 IF E2 �2 Fill—Fl— Ultimate Flow I—P I—P I—P P'00 Avl��b 0 ' —d t. lift 11— Fl— F oro F'—pt l "—Ptm O�',_p amereF�— "d "d "d "d " a�a ams ,g,) ty F—r F— F— F F Fl— "-p Ift) (ft) OFF(ft) W (pl) Vo (ft-3) .1 —d d,ft) lt, pek f ft� F.FF 13F 13F 3.1. k3- I F.. 1 11 I.FF F.17 11.73 —3 13- ,F'. -. 3 99F 99F —F 1-1 13.31 1 3.F3 17 1,131 09, 117F.FF 311.93 777.9. leo Ol It.I — 1.3 13 F.F3 1.13 1.13 1 1- 7 111 — 3-F .31 111.11 E �q 112 �2 Itud-7 17.1 17 F." IF IF —9 —9 3 9 339 �,13. 11-F 9 Z371 311.9F FIIFF. 11.7 .1 9 3 — — 1.91 11.91 1 F.- 1� 179 1,F71 I-IF 7-1 1-73 H 2�2 2�2 'F 3 2!221 5zM22 27 22 zg '13 IF N2 W 3 �2 P�02 L� 1 72 1 2 E 1 2 1 1 1 1 �12 1 N2 1 09 7 F9 3 F.- 131 187.11 1 22.27 1 117 1 22.76 1 �22 1 �2 1.12 2 F.F, 1 11 �2 Q21 ,�Fqq 2 FF 2 FF IZ Greenwood Service Area Lift Stations Current H.- 1 A11- OF =0 0128 W vp w 12 37 �8 2357R4 F� Ty 11 lose- 8 -41-41 t Es! 8� -- 11. .61 2- � 3- - 1.3 21.85 1- 11, 21821.82 1854- 11- 2,354.13 - 35- 1 .... 1652 38 7�2 52819.216 1111 3.7 :L78 1 2 2 1 .6 L 2 2 1,�9� _ 6 5 1,245 166,41 7_ 8 `8 '92 12H _Ll,2 93 "I go 1 Hill IMM M 65 4 9 6 1 T22 M 16 IN T2 65 t65 R,888 19 5!R 4=5 121 21E2 I 1ZI-92 1150 me°psm .9.4 1� 6 :4 �E 158.16 42 3�574 29 14171 2 Ultimate How P AV 3 (s 9��Il PZpk�l� �,P",k PP�'. 'P.-P I ) �l. "'t" ty P_ __ft) -fl =1 =2 Zu Z=4 P.-p- P.: "= ,' ""t p P_ P _5 t.3, k 2472 475 1,16 2 65 65 1- 26 6 3 ` 1 62 2 9 9 9 J6 72 9 1515M 5 6� 9 =M 13 7 823 E�j 5 8 79 61 1 9 9 18 69 18 6 18 6 18 6 9 8 1 19 9 422 7 479�1� 7� 1 2 3 3 3 AT�d_s 5111) 9 13 5 5 7T 7T 166 2 85 1 5 2�69 1 9 1 9 1 1869 2 _4 =Q==47 2 3PI 6. 11.8 14.75 3 8 5.66 8 151 294,3 374 2 J�t 8_ 569- .46 3 2- 3- 3- - 11 .1 4 1 21.85 1, 11, 21325- 1519.15 15 2 .2 33.47 y 1� 2 1511 K. 6 111 ae 6 1597 1 1 74 - 5 W 2 24m23 �1 F 1,425 6 3 '8 91_2 8 9 929 9 929 9 9 9 9 9292� 9292�� 29 92 1 ll =i 54 12 3- 3- 21- .. 16.2 1 1 m a 1 1 I!M 1155222 2,6HER M_�1 Laguna Madre Area Lift Stations Current Flow I-P I-P I-P P'off A- A-Waw _O t P'P',� EI, 0 III, A-r-11t, I-11t, ", , f PI, , 0 (g,) F F F F It, (ft) (ft) OFF(ft) (ft) ft, sail f (ft-O) (g� (ft-O) F� 111- I "22.21 7.71 H i 2 Cw. 2Z2 1 1 Z22 1 �2 1 2 772.66 23 2 1,161 111.73 1.., 11 1,657 12,622 '37.11 13 OF 1,-.6F I F.,I F.F2 2 16F -1 F.F6 6 67.17 1 11-t.Flt, Ultimate Flo. 1—2 1—3 1— Off a�a F 00't--ft- 1;- pl..dfj�t, (ft-3) Flt, I-Flt, P'P',� E"Zp 0 E'Zpt' O�',_p 1 .1 1 Al�,��l Al�,��l lift-i- I'ZI,2F23 F f I-, 't Pd =t df 2F2, -tr (g,) (11) F t, F F Flt, (ft) (ft) OFF(ft) 1.1-ty -.1 -d d,ft) F-11- 231.17 1.6 3 HF 13F "'F, 6 F, Ot 1.13 IF 1., -6 ".3-F 2-3F Z171 3-71 7 --y-k 2F22 6.71 31 F.F, 2 121 121 21F I I I FFF IF 73 "t, 17.1F 13.F3 127- 177 F.31 2 1- 1- 2,FFF 22 23 F 1.13 12 113 - It-F 13- 1 F�9-Ihtr.,(11-1) 2- 1F3F.26 3,- -6 3 - - 1,7. 1.71 1.21 16 1- Ot 123 3,116 136-F 11-7 2F 1.2 3 IF 1 1-- 2- F., 117 F.It 2 2FF - 1.7 2.. 2 1�! �2 226 1,612 -.1F 61- 1,2FF 16F.36 �2 1 It-1- -67 121 F.2. 2 121 121 21F - 3 6 1�2 �2 317 312.1F -7. 1 F.- 6 7 FF 13 1.3 1 2.61 12 ��3 -71 IF 221 2� L22222 2F21 3- 1.3.3 37 1 3 1 lk 1 "222 1.71 -1 3 12 3.12 2F 161 7 2F 3,73,t i -.22 i �2 Ot 1 1 �2 L21 ��2221 "222221 �2� 1 2- ON 2,IFF 1.16 11 1 1 .21 IF72 1 1,F71.F1 1 .-1 2-3 2.1 F.F6 1 2 16F F.I. 6 71 1 121 1 7F.FF 1 1.36 1 61.33 1 Oso Service Area Lift Stations Current Flow p I—I p P'l -I air. Ircl W, ,'g' Av�'r,� vdodW W ap lift I I I I I I_, pb I t, I.l, �Pgh,I I zpk�l _p, (ft)ion ee°a ion vu m IIII p (ft-3 lt) (ft/,) (ft-I) (0) pek f A,rhhe.. 1.11 303.31 113 1.11 1 .1 .1 1 1� 3 3 1 1 1.11 NO 1 111.13 Il 11 ..1 11 11 1.11 1 111 111 1�2 12 3 1 1— NO 11 "1 IMI Il I 1 1.l 111— 6 0 1 I— .I, I I— I 1 211 11 13.11 12.11 2 1— NO 11 "t, 3 1.31 13. IMI I, l leh.h Iq 2.11 31M 121 1.2. 2 211 211 '1 1, 1.11 1.21 3 3.11 NO 1 11 121 111 21 301 1, 1.31 2K 14 ; '23 1_3II �2 311 212 1,1.3 111"1 1, 1I.M IM I I.M 2 1 1 111 1, 1 11 2 !1 NO 12 2:1 _9 1.12 1,112 221.1.Il I It— 1I.M I.M I I.M 2 111 111 2 NO 12 L12 I 1,— .31 Il b0h I I.M 1122 11 3.�O 1.:35 3 1.11� 1.11� =a TH IN 1 2,t 2.30 NO 12 111 111 111.12 "1 1, .,1 11 '1 1.31 2 111 111 1.12 NO 1 11 121 24. 32.13 111 I I.M 111.12 .11 1.11 2 1 1 O�12 1 0 2 2.1. NO 12 2,111 1,313 111 111 2123 I.M 1131.11 32 �.MI 3XII 1,211 1211 11 1.13 NO 32 6,31 1,131 31 11 1.111.10 11,631 1,121.1' 31 1.61 2 111 1 111 11 11 11�22 �2 2261 1 46 161M Il ii '6� 0.19 El �22 4,241 1 31,113 1 131i�� 472!4g _"'��Zj .96"1 III _2 'RE 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1.311 11 .1 IF 6 -2123 34E 31 111 1 1, 1 331 21 _6 , 3_3 Ultimate Flow Well 1p-,hg Ilerm,-t,oh k f lump I lump 2 lump 3 lump 4 1pbe 'P' W17e WlUe A`lwme�.bge Avo�r�be heebeto be a�a W (�f') th d, 0 lift 2123 g I_b0h 2121 110, p (ft) p I,_, (ft-3 lt) (ft-3) (0) pek f 'f_) A,hhe.. 113 3.1 2 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 2.9 3 3 2 12 3.91 NO 27 161 1.611 2.� 211.12 3,621 4.4.11 Il I, 576 ON,2 N9 21�� 1 2 211 211 3 1.49 NO 6�. 1 13.19 Il I Ahthor E 5 46 1.21 2.12 1 6 111 Iq Ir,ve 211.9. '1 1.23 2 411 411 4M 1.21 11.21 3 1 1 NO 12 339 '2 111.29 1,113 229M Il I 222.12 ",'1 3.91 2 6.29 9 3 1 1.96 NO 16 71. 2 62� 391 949 126.93 Il I, 416.19 691 1.14 2:±ff H 111 1.44 2.94 3. '4 1.6. NO 1 116 .64 IX31 136 "1 22 I� "111 12.21 3 1, 1.41 4 24 ..1 W, 12 412 66 '1 z iLl� 12 ..121 19.44 :Tm:Ta 6 111 26,111 Il 4 2.14 1 36 ..21 W1 13 -=a 2� 922!E - 1921 111 Ireehfield,by the I�y 219.2. 1,3211 2.911 611 11 "1 11 111 1 1,611 1 11 3.3. 1... 1 12 3.16 1 NO 1 121 111 3,111 Iiii 1,4 Il blg,Cro.,,WW 199 11 3... 1... 4 12 1.13 N 3 46212 32.15 11 1 I I I 22, 122 1�2 i12 '��2 O�2 3.9. 1.12 1 1 2 1 '1 gH 12' 22 Lle,WW 1 211.91 q'I �13 '1 I�I '1 2" 3.11 N2 Hg 36' 1E 47 29.1.Il li Ile-der WW 1.2. 11 1.12 111 111 Il 13.66 12.16 2 4 1.19 NO 4 19 141 11 2.21 121 16.64 Il l leh.h Iq WW 34.21 "1 1.26 211 211 '1 1, 1.11 1.21 3 4 I.M NO 6 11 129 116 23.46 313 41.2q Il I I I ler,llWW 3 611 611 111 4.11 1.21 2 1 3 NO 6 42 3 221.19 1,311 1.3.1."1 14 Ith-eh WW 272 82�� 2�8 2 411 411 111 1, 4.4 2.9 2 1 3.41 NO 9 91 1-4 2 161.42 4.6 64.9-"1 Ilough WW 111.62 1 I.M 2 411 411 111 1, 9.94 11.94 2 1 NO 12 26 1 1,692 226.21 Il It—WW 264.M 1.2 1.14 2 611 611 111 12 2.22 NO 12 4 1 113 116M 2,211 291.1b I, I II I O�12 M 12 111 b0h I WW 1223�62 3.�2ii 5.25 3 1.411 1.411 IN 31 1 24 4.43 NO 6�� 4.41� 4.&H 626.63 26.11"1 1, Iuprtree WW 2,1 2 2 1.11 NO 6 3 1 121.33 443 19.16.111 II 1.1CCWW 94.19 16. 1.31 2 111 111 O�12 4.13 1 1.11 NO 6 212 2 31 4 9 Weber,Ileh WW 21..11 1., 1.11 2 411 411 111 1, 4.26 2.23 NO 12 364 1 2.�22 '' 42 216 11 W11bm,WW 1199.12 14,121 32.31 3 4XII 3XII 6,211 6,211 19,111 1, 3.41 4.1. NO 32 6,434 4.,131 36 111 .3 1 .3.1, 1211 111 226 1,692 1 111 Wooldr,dge 11 WW 233.111 11.33 1: 2 1�2 1 1�2 11�1�2 O�12 1.311 11 .1 31M1241 1 31,113 1 31111 1 1,139.11 1 1,921 19232 771 Wooldr,dge WW 4696.6.1 IIIH 1 33.611 3 1!�I 1 1!�I 111I i White Cap Service Area Lift Stations Current Flow Pe oro ZZI TM2 if' Q' '1,� P' P",", 2— 2 T M 112 .2 3 13 NO �7i im ��q NO -- ' .� w 2 11�1�21 212 Ig Gyp� 2 3—14—0 2-326 '3 I'll 3.11 1 2 .64 17 137 1--h 1. NO 2 4 -2 NO 6",43, .6 11.44 NO 2"6,22, N.ids 1 NO —11 2 42 1236 165 2' - 3 0 4 2 3 2 4 37 181 '8 0 366 733 0 312 .0 11 .0 6 4 12 8 1 NO -3 2.11 36 6 52, 55 .0 1 2 5224 1.1 61 sp 7 2gi 2� 226 1' 62 22'2—1521-- 4 0 1 6 1 1 4�1 4 23 2 635 1556 2533 A g85 85 70m685835 52 4'6 162 22 4 2 3�.27 "M —M14662 133 P le' 326 42 —.154 118 h� 3 Ultimate How 2— PZPk�l).- )k Pd3 =4 11 P, Pllp)tlll e�aP PPio �P_ _d aeor P _P, _5 ; ��I) pekf,, -ted 65: No 2,7 =2=a No 35 0 1-734 2 172 — NO 8.83 246,326 1843 814 1172 —9 NO 14 1 75 1.— N 4.8 7.67 115.5-8 864 1— 17— 1 NO - ik 4 1 2 2 11101 111 2=125 1=2 5 NO 2 6 —71439 1— 7 97.17 483 65 NO N Lee,- 518.62 �8 1.31 2 — 9. NO 1942 1467 196- 64 NO 55.93 163 -6 715 NO 3 5 6 7 6 5 35 52 6� 7235 6� 3 1� P 2 285M 52 165223 8 47 8 47 8 47 277 47 7'6 5 35 529 27 7-847 2- 7 67 1 9 1 9 1 = 9 9 9 1 9 1 9 1 = 9 1 = 9 1 = 9 32922�95�32 2 Q2� 6. 6=2 66 N 8 946 692 1 198- �O I., 27`8 7 P =8 1 226=447=297 0 19467= 1 28 7 9 5 93 278 NO 572 72 2.37 NO 6 41846.4 313 69 182 -W, it ? ;i2 413 NO —01 765 NO 1.5 51� 6 3 8 1 9 —7 — E 3t UO .5 UQ 111 Appendix C. Project Cost Sheets 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 1 of 238 Project:Clarkwood North Current Average Flow(gpm):609 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):991 Lift Station Sewershed:Clarkwood North 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,111 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,514 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater &Upgrade Contact:Director of Water Utilities Useful Life:20 years Priority:Critical Category:Lift Station Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair wet well between 2022-2024 to meet current flow conditions,and upgrade wet well to meet ultimate flow conditions. Increase wet well diameter from 8'to 10'between 2022-2024,an additional volume of 600 gallons.The wet well will need to be upsized again to 14'to meet ultimate flow conditions,an additional volume of 850 gallons.Pump controls will also need to be adjusted. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 78,600 $ 1,616,000 $ 5,472,000 $ 7,166,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 23,600 $ 484,800 $ 1,641,600 $ 2,150,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 7,900 $ 161,600 $ 547,200 $ 716,700 Bond(5%) $ 4,000 $ 80,800 $ 273,600 $ 358,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 7,900 $ 161,600 $ 547,200 $ 716,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 11,800 $ 242,400 $ 820,800 $ 1,075,000 Total S 133,800 S 2,747,200 S 9,302,400 S 12,183,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 2 of 238 Project:Cynthia Current Average Flow(gpm): 8 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):78 Lift Station Sewershed:Cynthia 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):47 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):47 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station and Priority:Critical Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair wet well and force main to meet current flow conditions.Increase wet well diameter from 4'to 8'between 2022-2024,an additional volume of 132 gallons.Controls will also need to be adjusted.Force Main needs to be upsized from 2"to 4"between 2022-2024. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 66,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 20,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 6,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,700 Bond(5%) $ 3,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 6,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 10,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,100 Total S 113,400 S 0 S 0 S 113,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thtw Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 3 of 238 Project:Highway 77 Current Average Flow(gpm):0 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway 77 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):960 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,999 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater &Upgrade Contact:Director of Water Utilities Useful Life:10 years Priority:Critical Category:Lift Station, Status:Near Term Pumps,and Force Main Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair force main to meet current flow conditions between 2022-2024.Upgrade pumps,wet well diameter,and force main to meet ultimate conditions.Force Main to be upsized from 2"to 4"between 2022-2024.For ultimate conditions pumps must be upsized,wet well will need to be upsized from 8'to 16'for an additional volume of 3,500 gallons and the Force Main will need to be further upsized from 4"to 12". Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 141,400 $ 2,894,700 $ 6,030,600 $ 9,066,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 42,500 $ 868,500 $ 1,809,200 $ 2,720,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 14,200 $ 289,500 $ 603,100 $ 906,800 Bond(5%) $ 7,100 $ 144,800 $ 301,600 $ 453,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 14,200 $ 289,500 $ 603,100 $ 906,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 21,300 $ 434,300 $ 904,700 $ 1,360,300 Total S 240,700 S 4,921,300 S 10,252,300 S 15,414,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 4 of 238 Project:Lakes Northwest Current Average Flow(gpm):2 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14 Lift Station Sewershed:Lakes Northwest 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):758 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,632 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station and Priority:Critical Force Main Status: 10-year Justification&Description Upgrade wet well and force main diameter to meet ultimate flow conditions.Wet well to be upsized from 8'to 16'for an additional 2,800 gallons and force main to be upsized from 8"to 14"in ultimate time frame Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 2,810,900 $ 6,110,600 $ 8,921,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 843,300 $ 1,833,200 $ 2,676,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 281,100 $ 611,100 $ 892,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 140,600 $ 305,600 $ 446,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 281,100 $ 611,100 $ 892,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 421,700 $ 916,600 $ 1,338,300 Total S 0 S 4,778,700 S 10,388,200 S 15,166,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 5 of 238 Project:River Canyon Current Average Flow(gpm):22 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):211 Lift Station Sewershed:River Canyon 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 185 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:10 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Pumps Priority:Critical Status: 10-year Justification&Description Upgrade pumps to meet ultimate flow conditions.Pumps need to be upsized for ten year and ultimate flow conditions. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 242,000 $ 576,000 $ 818,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 72,600 $ 172,800 $ 245,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 24,200 $ 57,600 $ 81,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 12,100 $ 28,800 $ 40,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 24,200 $ 57,600 $ 81,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 36,300 $ 86,400 $ 122,700 Total S 0 S 411,400 S 979,200 S 1,390,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 6 of 238 Project:Sharpsburg LS(>5 MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater &Upgrade Contact:Director of Water Utilities Useful Life:10 years Priority:Critical Category:Lift Station, Status:Near Term Pumps,and Force Main Justification&Description Upgrade lift station to meet ultimate flow conditions.Lift station will need to be upgraded between 2022-2024 to hold an additional 6,000 gallons and upgraded in ultimate conditions for an additional 9,400 gallons.Wet well,force main,and pumps to be upsized and replaced. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 534,000 $ 2,808,500 $ 9,138,900 $12,481,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 160,200 $ 842,600 $ 2,741,700 $ 3,744,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 53,400 $ 280,900 $ 913,900 $ 1,248,200 Bond(5%) $ 26,700 $ 140,500 $ 457,000 $ 624,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 53,400 $ 280,900 $ 913,900 $ 1,248,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 80,100 $ 421,300 $ 1,370,900 $ 1,872,300 Total S 907,800 S 4,774,700 S 15,536,300 S 21,218,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 7 of 238 Project:Arcadia(>5MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:10 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station, Priority:Critical Pumps,and Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate and repair lift station to meet current flow conditions.Lift station renovation,force main diameter must be increased to 24",and pumps upsized between 2022-2024 for an additional 4,200 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $16,538,400 $ 0 $ 0 $16,538,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 4,961,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,961,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 1,653,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,653,900 Bond(5%) $ 827,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 827,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 1,653,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,653,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 2,480,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,480,800 Total S 28,115,600 S 0 S 0 S 28,115,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 8 of 238 Project:Coastal Meadows Current Average Flow(gpm): 15 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 197 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):236 Lift Station Sewershed:Coastal Meadows Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):745 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Future Status: 10-year Justification&Description Replace force main with gravity pipe.Install 10,400 LF of 24"gravity pipe. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 3,640,000 $ 0 $ 3,640,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 1,092,000 $ 0 $ 1,092,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 364,000 $ 0 $ 364,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 182,000 $ 0 $ 182,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 364,000 $ 0 $ 364,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 546,000 $ 0 $ 546,000 Total S 0 S 6,188,000 S 0 S 6,188,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 9 of 238 Project:Highway Nine Current Average Flow(gpm): 19 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,331 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station Priority:Critical Status: 10-year Justification&Description Upgrade lift station to meet ultimate flow conditions.Lift Station wet well upsized from 8'to 14'for an additional 775 gallons and controls to be adjusted between 2022-2024. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 914,100 $ 1,094,400 $ 2,008,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 274,300 $ 328,400 $ 602,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 91,500 $ 109,500 $ 201,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 45,800 $ 54,800 $ 100,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 91,500 $ 109,500 $ 201,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 137,200 $ 164,200 $ 301,400 Total S 0 S 1,554,400 S 1,860,800 S 3,415,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 10 of 238 Project:Kostoryz(>5MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm):407 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 11,532 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Lift Station Sewershed:Kostoryz Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:10 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station, Priority:Critical Pumps,and Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Wet well to be upsized from 21.85'to 34'diameter for an additional 17,610 gallons,force main to be upsized to 30",and the pumps are to be upsized between 2022-2024. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $24,224,400 $ 2,223,600 $ 0 $26,448,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 7,267,400 $ 667,100 $ 0 $ 7,934,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 2,422,500 $ 222,400 $ 0 $ 2,644,900 Bond(5%) $ 1,211,300 $ 111,200 $ 0 $ 1,322,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 2,422,500 $ 222,400 $ 0 $ 2,644,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 3,633,700 $ 333,600 $ 0 $ 3,967,300 Total S 41,181,800 S 3,780,300 S 0 S 44,962,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 1 1 of 238 Project:McBride(>5MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:10 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station, Priority:Critical Pumps,and Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Lift Station wet well diameter to be increased to 24'for an additional 11,400 gallons,force main diameter to be upsized to 24",and pumps need to be upsized. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $15,720,900 $ 4,811,400 $ 0 $20,532,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 4,716,300 $ 1,443,500 $ 0 $ 6,159,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 1,572,100 $ 481,200 $ 0 $ 2,053,300 Bond(5%) $ 786,100 $ 240,600 $ 0 $ 1,026,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 1,572,100 $ 481,200 $ 0 $ 2,053,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 2,358,200 $ 721,800 $ 0 $ 3,080,000 Total S 26,725,700 S 8,179,700 S 0 S 34,905,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project tl 12 of 238 Project:Port/Pearse(>5MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm):749 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 10,235 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):7,950 Lift Station Sewershed:Port/Pearse Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):7,950 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:10 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station, Priority:Critical Pumps,and Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Lift Station wet well diameter to be increased to 24'for an additional 22,000 gallons,force main diameter to be upsized to 30",and pumps need to be upsized between 2022-2024. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $33,577,200 $ 0 $ 0 $33,577,200 Contingency(30°x) $10,073,200 $ 0 $ 0 $10,073,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 3,357,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,357,800 Bond(5%) $ 1,678,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,678,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 3,357,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,357,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 5,036,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,036,600 Total S 57,081,500 S 0 S 0 S 57,081,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 13 of 238 Project:Sacky(>5MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm): 140 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,755 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):4,797 Lift Station Sewershed:Sacky Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,895 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater &Upgrade Contact:Director of Water Utilities Useful Life:10 years Priority:Critical Category:Lift Station, Status:Near Term Pumps,and Force Main Justification&Description Lift station improvements needed in order to meet current and ultimate flow conditions.Force Main to be upsized from 16"to 20"between 2022-2024.In ultimate flow conditions,the lift station wet well will require a diameter of 20'and pumps will need to be upsized for an additional 7,400 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,787,500 $ 1,766,700 $ 5,400,000 $ 8,954,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 536,300 $ 530,100 $ 1,620,000 $ 2,686,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 178,800 $ 176,700 $ 540,000 $ 895,500 Bond(5%) $ 89,400 $ 88,400 $ 270,000 $ 447,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 178,800 $ 176,700 $ 540,000 $ 895,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 268,200 $ 265,100 $ 810,000 $ 1,343,300 Total S 3,039,000 S 3,003,700 S 9,180,000 S 15,222,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 14 of 238 Project:Laguna Shores(>5MGD) Current Average Flow(gpm): 887 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,946 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Lift Station Sewershed:Laguna Shores Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation and repairs needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Wet well to be upsized to have a diameter of 22'between 2022-2024 for an additional 6,000 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 9,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,000,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 2,700,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,700,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 900,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 900,000 Bond(5%) $ 450,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 450,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 900,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 900,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 1,350,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,350,000 Total S 15,300,000 S 0 S 0 S 15,300,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 15 of 238 Project:Military and Jester Current Average Flow(gpm): 151 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,999 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,410 Lift Station Sewershed:Military and Jester Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,410 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Force Main Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station and force main rehabilitation and repairs needed to meet current flow conditions.Force Main to be upsized from 10"to 12"and wet well to be upsized from 10'to 20'between 2022-2024 for an additional 3,700 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,393,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,393,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 418,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 418,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 139,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 139,400 Bond(5%) $ 69,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 139,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 139,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 209,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 209,200 Total S 2,369,600 S 0 S 0 S 2,369,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 16 of 238 Project:Everhart/Staples Current Average Flow(gpm): 524 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,802 Lift Station Sewershed:Everhart/Staptes 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,263 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,725 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station and Priority:Critical Force Main Status: 10-year Justification&Description Lift station upgrades needed in order to meet ulitmate flow conditions.Wet well upsizing from 13.12'to 24'in ultimate conditions for an additional 14,800 gallons.Force Main to be upsized to an equivalent diameter of 36". Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $24,613,400 $46,800,000 $71,413,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 7,384,100 $14,040,000 $21,424,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 2,461,400 $ 4,680,000 $ 7,141,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 1,230,700 $ 2,340,000 $ 3,570,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 2,461,400 $ 4,680,000 $ 7,141,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 3,692,100 $ 7,020,000 $10,712,100 Total S 0 S 41,843,100 S 79,560,000 $121,403,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 17 of 238 Project:Perry Place WW Current Average Flow(gpm): 162 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Perry Place 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,073 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station and Priority:Critical Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation and repairs needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Upsize wet well from 6'to 12'and upsize force main from 10"to 16"between 2022-2024 for an additional 1,200 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 8,702,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,702,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 2,610,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,610,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 870,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 870,200 Bond(5%) $ 435,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 435,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 870,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 870,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 1,305,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,305,300 Total S 14,793,400 S 0 S 0 S 14,793,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 18 of 238 Project:Jackfish Current Average Flow(gpm): 144 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 518 Lift Station Sewershed:Jacklish 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):535 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 535 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation and repairs needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Increase wet well diameter from 7.67'to 10'for an additional 500 gallons between 2022-2023. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 78,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 23,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 7,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,900 Bond(5%) $ 4,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 7,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 11,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,800 Total S 133,800 S 0 S 0 S 133,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 19 of 238 Project:PI Section 4 Current Average Flow(gpm): 867 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,563 Lift Station Sewershed:PI Section 4 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,888 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):2,977 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater &Upgrade Contact:Director of Water Utilities Useful Life:20 years Priority:Critical Category:Lift Station and Status:Near Term Force Main Justification&Description Lift station rehabilitation/repair needed in order to meet current flow conditions.Upsize wet well from 4.2'to 20'before 2024 for an additional 3,700 gallons.Wet well will need to be increased to 24'for ultimate conditions and force main diameter increased from 4"to 18"for an additional 2,800 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 573,800 $ 1,897,700 $10,542,600 $13,014,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 172,200 $ 569,400 $ 3,162,800 $ 3,904,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 57,400 $ 189,800 $ 1,054,300 $ 1,301,500 Bond(5%) $ 28,700 $ 94,900 $ 527,200 $ 650,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 57,400 $ 189,800 $ 1,054,300 $ 1,301,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 86,100 $ 284,700 $ 1,581,500 $ 1,952,300 Total S 975,600 S 3,226,300 S 17,922,700 S 22,124,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 20 of 238 Project:Seahorse Current Average Flow(gpm):73 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 85 Lift Station Sewershed:Seahorse 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 116 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):278 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:20 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Lift Station and Priority:Critical Force Main Status:Near Term Justification&Description Lift station to be rehabilitated in order to meet current flow conditions.Upsize wet well diameter from 6'to 10'and force main diameter 4"to 6" between 2023-2024 for an additional 400 gallons. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 127,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 127,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 38,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 12,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,900 Bond(5%) $ 6,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 12,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 19,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,300 Total S 218,000 S 0 S 0 S 218,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 21 of 238 Project:Chispa Creek Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1290 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Chispa Creek in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 463,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 463,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 139,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 139,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 46,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,400 Bond(5%) $ 23,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 46,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 69,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,500 Total S 787,700 S 0 S 0 S 787,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 22 of 238 Project:La Branch Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 10 LF of 27 inch pipe,along La Branch in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,100 $ 3,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 400 $ 400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 200 $ 200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 400 $ 400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 500 $ 500 Total S 0 S 0 S 5,600 S 5,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 23 of 238 Project:Nolford Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 510 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Nolford in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 186,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 186,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 56,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 18,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,700 Bond(5%) $ 9,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 18,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 28,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,100 Total S 317,900 S 0 S 0 S 317,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 24 of 238 Project:Palisade Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 700 LF of 10 inch pipe,130 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Palisade in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 245,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 245,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 73,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 73,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 24,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,600 Bond(5%) $ 12,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 24,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 36,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,800 Total S 417,100 S 0 S 0 S 417,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 25 of 238 Project:Raintree Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:280 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Raintree in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 106,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 106,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 31,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 10,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,700 Bond(5%) $ 5,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 10,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 16,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,000 Total S 180,900 S 0 S 0 S 180,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 26 of 238 Project:Sessions Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 950 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Sessions in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 607,100 $ 607,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 182,200 $ 182,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 60,800 $ 60,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,400 $ 30,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 60,800 $ 60,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,100 $ 91,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,032,400 S 1,032,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 27 of 238 Project:Wandering Creek Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 830 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Wandering Creek in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 323,900 $ 323,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 97,200 $ 97,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,400 $ 32,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,400 $ 32,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,600 $ 48,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 550,700 S 550,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 28 of 238 Project:Clarkwood Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):217 Lift Station Sewershed:Clarkwood South 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):261 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):460 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1500 LF of 12 inch pipe,4080 LF of 15 inch pipe, along Clarkwood in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,951,200 $ 1,951,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 585,400 $ 585,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 195,200 $ 195,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 97,600 $ 97,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 195,200 $ 195,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 292,700 $ 292,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,317,300 S 3,317,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 29 of 238 Project:I-37 Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:430 LF of 42 inch pipe,along I-37 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 361,400 $ 361,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 108,500 $ 108,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,200 $ 36,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,100 $ 18,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,200 $ 36,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,300 $ 54,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 614,700 S 614,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 30 of 238 Project:Sharpsburg Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 140 LF of 42 inch pipe,along Sharpsburg Section 1 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,400 $ 118,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,600 $ 35,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,900 $ 11,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,900 $ 11,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,800 $ 17,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 201,600 S 201,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 3 1 of 238 Project:Cynthia Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1000 LF of 15 inch pipe,along Cynthia in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 334,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 334,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 100,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 33,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,500 Bond(5%) $ 16,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 33,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 50,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,200 Total S 568,500 S 0 S 0 S 568,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 32 of 238 Project:Sharpsburg Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1200 LF of 15 inch pipe,along Sharpsburg Section 2 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 454,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 454,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 136,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 136,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 45,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,500 Bond(5%) $ 22,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 33,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 68,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 68,300 Total S 761,300 S 0 S 0 S 761,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 33 of 238 Project:Zamora Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 540 LF of 12 inch pipe,460 LF of 15 inch pipe, along Zamora in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 360,500 $ 360,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 108,200 $ 108,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,100 $ 36,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,100 $ 18,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,100 $ 36,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,100 $ 54,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 613,100 S 613,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 34 of 238 Project:Hearn Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1850 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Hearn in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 960,800 $ 960,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 288,300 $ 288,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 96,100 $ 96,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,100 $ 48,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 96,100 $ 96,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 144,200 $ 144,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,633,600 S 1,633,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 35 of 238 Project:Lorna Alta Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 940 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Loma Alta Section 1 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 487,200 $ 487,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 146,200 $ 146,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,800 $ 48,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,400 $ 24,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,800 $ 48,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 73,100 $ 73,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 828,500 S 828,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 36 of 238 Project:Country Estates Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 360 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Country Estates in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 90,500 $ 90,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,200 $ 27,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,100 $ 9,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,600 $ 4,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,100 $ 9,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,600 $ 13,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 154,100 S 154,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 37 of 238 Project:Leopard Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1010 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Leopard Section 1 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 537,500 $ 537,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 161,300 $ 161,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,800 $ 53,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 26,900 $ 26,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,800 $ 53,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 80,700 $ 80,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 914,000 S 914,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 38 of 238 Project:Lorna Alta Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 740 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Loma Alta Section 2 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 393,400 $ 393,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,100 $ 118,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,400 $ 39,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,700 $ 19,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,400 $ 39,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,100 $ 59,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 669,100 S 669,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 39 of 238 Project:Northwest Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 940 LF of 15 inch pipe,along Northwest in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 292,200 $ 292,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 87,700 $ 87,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,300 $ 29,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,700 $ 14,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,300 $ 29,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,900 $ 43,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 497,100 S 497,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 40 of 238 Project:Perry Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1360 LF of 15 inch pipe,780 LF of 18 inch pipe, along Perry in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 718,200 $ 718,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 215,500 $ 215,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,900 $ 71,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,900 $ 71,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 107,800 $ 107,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,221,300 S 1,221,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 41 of 238 Project:Leopard Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:220 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Leopard Section 2 in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 82,900 $ 82,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,900 $ 24,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,300 $ 8,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,200 $ 4,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,300 $ 8,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 141,100 S 141,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 42 of 238 Project:Main Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2600 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Main in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 927,500 $ 927,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 278,300 $ 278,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 92,800 $ 92,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,400 $ 46,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 92,800 $ 92,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 139,200 $ 139,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,577,000 S 1,577,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 43 of 238 Project:Stillwell Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 760 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Stillwell in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 286,400 $ 286,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 86,000 $ 86,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,700 $ 28,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,400 $ 14,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,700 $ 28,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,000 $ 43,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 487,200 S 487,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 44 of 238 Project:Santa Gertrudis Current Average Flow(gpm):61 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):314 Lift Station Sewershed:WoodRiver 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):351 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 110 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Santa Gertrudis in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,200 $ 40,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,100 $ 12,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,100 $ 4,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,100 $ 2,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,100 $ 4,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,100 $ 6,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 68,700 S 68,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 45 of 238 Project:Beacon Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison Gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1130 LF of 12 inch pipe,1430 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Beacon in Allison WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 788,400 $ 788,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 236,600 $ 236,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,900 $ 78,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,500 $ 39,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,900 $ 78,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,300 $ 118,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,340,600 S 1,340,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 46 of 238 Project:Antelope Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:4820 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Antelope in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 2,614,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,614,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 784,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 784,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 261,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 261,500 Bond(5%) $ 130,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 130,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 261,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 261,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 392,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 392,200 Total S 4,445,000 S 0 S 0 S 4,445,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 47 of 238 Project:Leigh Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 500 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Leigh in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 178,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 178,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 53,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 17,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,900 Bond(5%) $ 9,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 17,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 26,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 26,800 Total S 303,800 S 0 S 0 S 303,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 48 of 238 Project:Leopard Section 3 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 710 LF of 10 inch pipe,450 LF of 20 inch pipe,520 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Leopard Section 3 in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 633,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 633,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 190,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 190,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 63,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,400 Bond(5%) $ 31,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 63,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 95,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 95,100 Total S 1,077,300 S 0 S 0 S 1,077,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 49 of 238 Project:Nueces Bay Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:460 LF of 18 inch pipe,420 LF of 24 inch pipe, along Nueces Bay in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 368,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 368,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 110,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 110,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 36,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,800 Bond(5%) $ 18,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 36,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 55,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,200 Total S 625,600 S 0 S 0 S 625,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 50 of 238 Project:Old Robstown Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1380 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Old Robstown in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 523,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 523,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 157,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 157,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 52,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 52,400 Bond(5%) $ 26,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 26,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 52,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 52,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 78,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,500 Total S 889,700 S 0 S 0 S 889,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 51 of 238 Project:Up River Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 190 LF of 15 inch pipe,2220 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Up River Section 1 in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 19,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 6,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,500 Bond(5%) $ 3,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 6,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 9,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,800 Total S 110,600 S 0 S 0 S 110,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project 1f 52 of 238 Project:Villa Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1240 LF of 15 inch pipe,along Villa in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 393,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 393,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 118,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 39,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,400 Bond(5%) $ 19,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 39,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 59,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,100 Total S 669,100 S 0 S 0 S 669,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 53 of 238 Project:Westchester Current Average Flow(gpm):2,830 WWTP Service Area:Broadway Current Peak Flow(gpm): 5,016 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,175 Lift Station Sewershed:Resaca Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,513 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 320 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Westchester in Broadway WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 78,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 23,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 7,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,900 Bond(5%) $ 4,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 7,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 11,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,800 Total S 133,800 S 0 S 0 S 133,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 54 of 238 Project:Edwards Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1370 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Edwards in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 376,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 376,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 112,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 112,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 37,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 37,700 Bond(5%) $ 18,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 37,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 37,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 56,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,500 Total S 640,000 S 0 S 0 S 640,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 55 of 238 Project:Kosar Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 300 LF of 18 inch pipe,70 LF of 20 inch pipe, 170 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Kosar in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 256,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 256,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 77,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 77,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 25,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,700 Bond(5%) $ 12,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 25,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 38,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,500 Total S 436,200 S 0 S 0 S 436,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 56 of 238 Project:Naples Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 3140 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Naples in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,349,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,349,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 404,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 404,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 135,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 135,000 Bond(5%) $ 67,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 135,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 135,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 202,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 202,500 Total S 2,294,300 S 0 S 0 S 2,294,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 57 of 238 Project:Shely Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 860 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Shely in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 223,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 223,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 67,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 22,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,400 Bond(5%) $ 11,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 22,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 33,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,500 Total S 379,600 S 0 S 0 S 379,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 58 of 238 Project:Staples Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1340 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Staples Section 1 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 567,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 567,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 170,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 170,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 56,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,800 Bond(5%) $ 28,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 56,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 85,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,100 Total S 964,400 S 0 S 0 S 964,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 59 of 238 Project:York Current Average Flow(gpm):418 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,101 Lift Station Sewershed:Arcadia Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,100 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1040 LF of 24 inch pipe,along York in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 419,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 419,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 126,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 126,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 42,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,000 Bond(5%) $ 21,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 42,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 63,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,000 Total S 713,700 S 0 S 0 S 713,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 60 of 238 Project:Ayers Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 970 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Ayers Section 1 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 150,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 150,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 45,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 15,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,100 Bond(5%) $ 7,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 15,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 22,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,600 Total S 256,100 S 0 S 0 S 256,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 61 of 238 Project:IH-37 Access Road Current Average Flow(gpm): 19 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,331 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:440 LF of 10 inch pipe,350 LF of 12 inch pipe, 430 LF of 16 inch pipe,along IH-37 Access Road in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 406,200 $ 406,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 121,900 $ 121,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,700 $ 40,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,400 $ 20,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,700 $ 40,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 61,000 $ 61,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 690,900 S 690,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project 1f 62 of 238 Project:Leopard Section 4 Current Average Flow(gpm): 19 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,331 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with: 130 LF of 12 inch pipe,940 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Leopard Section 4 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 364,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 364,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 109,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 109,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 36,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,500 Bond(5%) $ 18,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 36,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 54,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,800 Total S 620,500 S 0 S 0 S 620,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 63 of 238 Project:Carroll Current Average Flow(gpm):407 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 11,532 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Lift Station Sewershed:Kostoryz Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 320 LF of 16 inch pipe,1370 LF of 20 inch pipe, 1260 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Carroll in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,300,400 $ 1,300,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 390,200 $ 390,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 130,100 $ 130,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,100 $ 65,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 130,100 $ 130,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 195,100 $ 195,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,211,000 S 2,211,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 64 of 238 Project:Cresthill Current Average Flow(gpm):407 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 11,532 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Lift Station Sewershed:Kostoryz Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:200 LF of 12 inch pipe,520 LF of 16 inch pipe, along Cresthill in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 290,500 $ 290,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 87,200 $ 87,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,100 $ 29,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,600 $ 14,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,100 $ 29,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,600 $ 43,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 494,100 S 494,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 65 of 238 Project:Kostoryz Current Average Flow(gpm):407 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 11,532 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Lift Station Sewershed:Kostoryz Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 10,530 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:4310 LF of 16 inch pipe,3630 LF of 20 inch pipe, 1130 LF of 24 inch pipe,40 LF of 42 inch pipe, 120 LF of 48 inch pipe,along Kostoryz in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,110,300 $ 4,110,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,233,100 $ 1,233,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 411,100 $ 411,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 205,600 $ 205,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 411,100 $ 411,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 616,600 $ 616,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 6,987,800 S 6,987,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 66 of 238 Project:Benys Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with: 1260 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Benys in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 466,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 466,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 140,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 140,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 46,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,700 Bond(5%) $ 23,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 46,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 70,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,000 Total S 793,200 S 0 S 0 S 793,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 67 of 238 Project:Clifton Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:750 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Clifton in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 242,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 242,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 72,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 72,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 24,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,300 Bond(5%) $ 12,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 24,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 36,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,400 Total S 412,600 S 0 S 0 S 412,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 68 of 238 Project:Concho Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:990 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Concho in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 539,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 539,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 161,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 161,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 53,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,900 Bond(5%) $ 27,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 53,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 80,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 80,900 Total S 916,400 S 0 S 0 S 916,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 69 of 238 Project:Derry Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:410 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Derry in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 133,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 133,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 40,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 13,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,400 Bond(5%) $ 6,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 13,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 20,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,100 Total S 227,200 S 0 S 0 S 227,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 70 of 238 Project:Lantana Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:2290 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Lantana in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,297,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,297,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 389,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 389,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 129,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,800 Bond(5%) $ 64,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 129,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 194,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 194,700 Total S 2,206,000 S 0 S 0 S 2,206,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 71 of 238 Project:Leopard Section 5 Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2150 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Leopard Section 5 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 741,500 $ 741,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 222,500 $ 222,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 74,200 $ 74,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 37,100 $ 37,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 74,200 $ 74,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 111,300 $ 111,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,260,800 S 1,260,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project 1f 72 of 238 Project:McBride Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:340 LF of 30 inch pipe,along McBride Section 1 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 221,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 221,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 66,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 22,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,200 Bond(5%) $ 11,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 22,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 33,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,300 Total S 377,100 S 0 S 0 S 377,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 73 of 238 Project:Padre Island Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:730 LF of 16 inch pipe,470 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Padre Island in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 445,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 445,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 133,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 133,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 44,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 44,600 Bond(5%) $ 22,300 $ 0 $ 1 $ 22,301 OH&P(10°x) $ 44,600 $ 0 $ 1 $ 44,601 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 66,900 $ 0 $ 1 $ 66,901 Total S 757,900 S 0 S 3 S 757,903 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 74 of 238 Project:Skyline Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions Replace existing pipe with:310 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Skyline in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 129,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 38,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 13,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,000 Bond(5%) $ 6,500 $ 0 $ 2 $ 6,502 OH&P(10°x) $ 13,000 $ 0 $ 2 $ 13,002 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 19,500 $ 0 $ 2 $ 19,502 Total S 220,400 S 0 S 6 S 220,406 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 75 of 238 Project:Williams Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 3160 LF of 21 inch pipe,along Williams in Oso W W TP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,366,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,366,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 410,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 410,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 136,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 136,700 Bond(5%) $ 68,400 $ 0 $ 3 $ 68,403 OH&P(10°x) $ 136,700 $ 0 $ 3 $ 136,703 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 205,100 $ 0 $ 3 $ 205,103 Total S 2,323,700 S 0 S 9 S 2,323,709 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 76 of 238 Project:Up River Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):736 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):7,787 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Lift Station Sewershed:McBride Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,900 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 3970 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Up River Section 2 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,850,300 $ 2,850,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 855,100 $ 855,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 285,100 $ 285,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 142,600 $ 142,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 285,100 $ 285,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 427,600 $ 427,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 4,845,800 S 4,845,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 77 of 238 Project:Alaniz Current Average Flow(gpm): 140 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,755 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):4,794 Lift Station Sewershed:Sacky WW Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,895 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 700 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Alaniz in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 212,000 $ 212,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,600 $ 63,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,200 $ 21,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,200 $ 21,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,800 $ 31,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 360,400 S 360,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 78 of 238 Project:Sacky Current Average Flow(gpm): 140 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,755 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):4,794 Lift Station Sewershed:Sacky WW Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):4,895 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 390 LF of 18 inch pipe,290 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Sacky in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 276,600 $ 276,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 83,000 $ 83,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,700 $ 27,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,900 $ 13,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,700 $ 27,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 41,500 $ 41,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 470,400 S 470,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 79 of 238 Project:Ayers Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current and ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:440 LF of 16 inch pipe,2240 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Ayers Section 2 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,102,600 $ 0 $ 1,104,100 $ 2,206,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 330,800 $ 0 $ 331,300 $ 662,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 110,300 $ 0 $ 110,500 $ 220,800 Bond(5%) $ 55,200 $ 0 $ 55,300 $ 110,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 110,300 $ 0 $ 110,500 $ 220,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 165,400 $ 0 $ 165,700 $ 331,100 Total S 1,874,600 S 0 S 1,877,400 S 3,752,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 80 of 238 Project:Camargo Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 30 LF of 36 inch pipe,along Camargo in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,600 $ 15,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,700 $ 4,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 800 $ 800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,400 $ 2,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 26,700 S 26,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 81 of 238 Project:Hwy 286 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 360 LF of 16 inch pipe,380 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Hwy 286 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 310,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 310,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 93,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 31,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,100 Bond(5%) $ 15,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 31,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 46,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,600 Total S 527,700 S 0 S 0 S 527,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project 1f 82 of 238 Project:McBride Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1490 LF of 30 inch pipe,along McBride Section 2 in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 729,000 $ 729,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 218,700 $ 218,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 72,900 $ 72,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,500 $ 36,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 72,900 $ 72,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 109,400 $ 109,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,239,400 S 1,239,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 83 of 238 Project:Neptune Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 640 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Neptune in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 157,300 $ 157,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 47,200 $ 47,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,800 $ 15,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,900 $ 7,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,800 $ 15,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,600 $ 23,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 267,600 S 267,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 84 of 238 Project:Old Brownsvi Ile Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2200 LF of 36 inch pipe,along Old Brownsville in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,802,100 $ 1,802,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 540,700 $ 540,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 180,300 $ 180,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 90,200 $ 90,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 180,300 $ 180,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 270,400 $ 270,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,064,000 S 3,064,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 85 of 238 Project:Omaha Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 620 LF of 10 inch pipe,1500 LF of 12 inch pipe, 5720 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Omaha in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,126,600 $ 4,126,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,238,000 $ 1,238,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 412,700 $ 412,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 206,400 $ 206,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 412,700 $ 412,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 619,000 $ 619,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 7,015,400 S 7,015,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 86 of 238 Project:Santa Elena Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 310 LF of 10 inch pipe,along Santa Elena in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 81,000 $ 81,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,300 $ 24,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,100 $ 8,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,100 $ 4,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,100 $ 8,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,200 $ 12,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 137,800 S 137,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 87 of 238 Project:Saratoga Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:Greenwood WWTP Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2570 LF of 36 inch pipe,110 LF of 60 inch pipe, along Saratoga in Greenwood WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,803,600 $ 1,803,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 541,100 $ 541,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 180,400 $ 180,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 90,200 $ 90,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 180,400 $ 180,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 270,600 $ 270,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,066,300 S 3,066,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 88 of 238 Project:Belmont Current Average Flow(gpm): 887 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,946 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Lift Station Sewershed:Laguna Shores Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:410 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Belmont in Laguna Madre WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 166,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 166,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 50,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 16,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,700 Bond(5%) $ 8,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 16,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 25,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,000 Total S 283,300 S 0 S 0 S 283,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 89 of 238 Project:Glenoak Current Average Flow(gpm): 887 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,946 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Lift Station Sewershed:Laguna Shores Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1790 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Glenoak in Laguna Madre WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 489,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 489,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 147,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 147,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 49,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 49,000 Bond(5%) $ 24,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 49,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 49,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 73,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 73,500 Total S 832,700 S 0 S 0 S 832,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 90 of 238 Project:St Bernadine Current Average Flow(gpm): 887 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,946 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Lift Station Sewershed:Laguna Shores Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,347 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 500 LF of 12 inch pipe,along St Bernadine in Laguna Madre WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 129,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 39,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 13,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,000 Bond(5%) $ 6,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 13,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 19,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,500 Total S 220,900 S 0 S 0 S 220,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 91 of 238 Project:Airline Current Average Flow(gpm):343 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 553 Lift Station Sewershed:Airline 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):997 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,375 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 620 LF of 20 inch pipe,1400 LF of 30 inch pipe, 3490 LF of 36 inch pipe,along Airline in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,537,600 $ 3,537,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,061,300 $ 1,061,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 353,800 $ 353,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 176,900 $ 176,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 353,800 $ 353,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 530,700 $ 530,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 6,014,100 S 6,014,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 92 of 238 Project:Rodd Field Current Average Flow(gpm):343 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 553 Lift Station Sewershed:Airtine 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):997 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,375 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 790 LF of 24 inch pipe,690 LF of 30 inch pipe, along Rodd Field in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 715,800 $ 715,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 214,800 $ 214,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,600 $ 71,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,800 $ 35,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,600 $ 71,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 107,400 $ 107,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,217,000 S 1,217,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 93 of 238 Project:Slough Current Average Flow(gpm):343 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 553 Lift Station Sewershed:Airline 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):997 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,375 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2300 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Slough in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,004,600 $ 1,004,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 301,400 $ 301,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,500 $ 100,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,300 $ 50,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,500 $ 100,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 150,700 $ 150,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,708,000 S 1,708,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 94 of 238 Project:Future Rodd Field Current Average Flow(gpm):42 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 189 Lift Station Sewershed:Bay Drive WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):514 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 550 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 140 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Future Rodd Field in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total S 0 S 0 S 0 S 0 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 95 of 238 Project:Chevy Hills Current Average Flow(gpm):348 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):924 Lift Station Sewershed:Country Club WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,500 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,500 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1130 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Cherry Hills in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 668,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 668,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 200,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 200,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 66,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,900 Bond(5%) $ 33,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 66,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 100,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,400 Total S 1,137,100 S 0 S 0 S 1,137,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 96 of 238 Project:Everhart Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):348 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):924 Lift Station Sewershed:Country Club WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,500 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,500 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 830 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Everhart Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 505,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 505,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 151,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 151,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 50,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,600 Bond(5%) $ 25,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 50,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 75,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,900 Total S 860,100 S 0 S 0 S 860,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 97 of 238 Project:Greenbriar Current Average Flow(gpm):348 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):924 Lift Station Sewershed:Country Club WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,500 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,500 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1060 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Greenbria in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 625,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 625,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 187,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 187,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 62,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,600 Bond(5%) $ 31,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 62,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 93,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,900 Total S 1,064,000 S 0 S 0 S 1,064,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 98 of 238 Project:River Oaks Current Average Flow(gpm):348 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):924 Lift Station Sewershed:Country Club WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,500 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,500 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 320 LF of 12 inch pipe,along River Oaks in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 116,800 $ 116,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,100 $ 35,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 $ 11,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,900 $ 5,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 $ 11,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,600 $ 17,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 198,800 S 198,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 99 of 238 Project:St Andrews Current Average Flow(gpm):348 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):924 Lift Station Sewershed:Country Club WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,500 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,500 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 340 LF of 12 inch pipe,950 LF of 16 inch pipe,along St Andrews in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 594,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 594,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 178,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 178,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 59,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,400 Bond(5%) $ 29,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 59,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 89,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 89,100 Total S 1,009,800 S 0 S 0 S 1,009,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 100 of 238 Project:Alameda Current Average Flow(gpm): 524 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,802 Lift Station Sewershed:Everhardt and Staples 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,263 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,725 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 790 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Alameda in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 333,100 $ 333,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,400 $ 33,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,700 $ 16,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,400 $ 33,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 566,600 S 566,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 101 of 238 Project:Casa Linda Current Average Flow(gpm): 524 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,802 Lift Station Sewershed:Everhardt and Staples 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,263 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,725 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1840 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Casa Linda in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 552,300 $ 552,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 165,700 $ 165,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,300 $ 55,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,700 $ 27,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,300 $ 55,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 82,900 $ 82,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 939,200 S 939,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 102 of 238 Project:Sinclair Current Average Flow(gpm): 524 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,802 Lift Station Sewershed:Everhardt and Staptes 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,263 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,725 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1620 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Sinclair in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 701,100 $ 701,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 210,400 $ 210,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,200 $ 70,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,100 $ 35,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,200 $ 70,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 105,200 $ 105,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,192,200 S 1,192,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 103 of 238 Project:Staples Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 524 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,802 Lift Station Sewershed:Everhardt and Staptes 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,263 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,725 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1170 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Staples Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 840,300 $ 840,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 252,100 $ 252,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 84,100 $ 84,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,100 $ 42,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 84,100 $ 84,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 126,100 $ 126,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,428,800 S 1,428,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 104 of 238 Project:Country Club Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:260 LF of 24 inch pipe,2000 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Country Club in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,725,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,725,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 517,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 517,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 172,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 172,600 Bond(5%) $ 86,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 86,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 172,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 172,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 258,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 258,900 Total S 2,934,100 S 0 S 0 S 2,934,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 105 of 238 Project:Gaines Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:4430 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Gaines in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,874,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,874,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 562,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 562,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 187,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 187,500 Bond(5%) $ 93,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 187,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 187,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 281,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 281,200 Total S 3,186,400 S 0 S 0 S 3,186,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 106 of 238 Project:Jarvis Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1300 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Jarvis in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 526,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 526,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 158,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 158,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 52,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 52,700 Bond(5%) $ 26,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 26,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 52,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 52,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 79,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 79,100 Total S 895,900 S 0 S 0 S 895,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 107 of 238 Project:Kentner Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 5430 LF of 24 inch pipe,50 LF of 30 inch pipe, along Kentner in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,302,900 $ 2,302,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 690,900 $ 690,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 230,300 $ 230,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 115,200 $ 115,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 230,300 $ 230,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 345,500 $ 345,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,915,100 S 3,915,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 108 of 238 Project:Robert Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 10 LF of 21 inch pipe,730 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Robert in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 303,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 303,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 91,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 30,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,400 Bond(5%) $ 15,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 30,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 45,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,500 Total S 515,700 S 0 S 0 S 515,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 109 of 238 Project:Gollihar Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1290 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Gollihar Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 404,500 $ 404,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 121,400 $ 121,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,500 $ 40,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,300 $ 20,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,500 $ 40,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 60,700 $ 60,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 687,900 S 687,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 1 10 of 238 Project:Mcardle Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:4160 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Mcardle Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,665,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,665,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 499,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 499,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 166,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 166,600 Bond(5%) $ 83,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 83,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 166,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 166,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 249,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 249,800 Total S 2,831,200 S 0 S 0 S 2,831,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 1 11 of 238 Project:Nile Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status: 10-yr Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Parallel a 24"pipe next to the existing 42".A 24"at this slope could take all flow from the Perry Place LS branch. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 162,200 $ 162,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,700 $ 48,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,300 $ 16,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,200 $ 8,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,300 $ 16,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,400 $ 24,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 276,100 S 276,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 112 of 238 Project:Easter Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1080 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Easter in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 326,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 326,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 98,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 98,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 32,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,700 Bond(5%) $ 16,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 32,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 49,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 49,000 Total S 555,300 S 0 S 0 S 555,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 113 of 238 Project:Mcardle Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 100 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Mcardle Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 29,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 8,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 2,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,900 Bond(5%) $ 1,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 2,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 4,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,400 Total S 49,400 S 0 S 0 S 49,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 114 of 238 Project:Christie Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:20 LF of 16 inch pipe,2340 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Christie in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,185,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,185,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 355,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 355,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 118,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,600 Bond(5%) $ 59,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 118,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 177,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 177,900 Total S 2,016,000 S 0 S 0 S 2,016,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 115 of 238 Project:Cuiper Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 150 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Cuiper in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 78,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 23,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 7,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,800 Bond(5%) $ 3,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 7,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 11,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 Total S 132,600 S 0 S 0 S 132,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 116 of 238 Project:Gollihar Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 660 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Gollihar Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 557,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 557,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 167,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 167,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 55,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,800 Bond(5%) $ 27,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 55,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 83,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 83,700 Total S 948,500 S 0 S 0 S 948,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 117 of 238 Project:Santa Fe Section 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1110 LF of 16 inch pipe,1220 LF of 18 inch pipe,9160 LF of 24 inch pipe,640 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Santa Fe Section 1 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 5,639,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,639,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 1,691,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,691,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 564,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 564,000 Bond(5%) $ 282,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 282,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 564,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 564,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 846,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 846,000 Total S 9,587,300 S 0 S 0 S 9,587,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 1 18 of 238 Project:Everhart Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:4960 LF of 36 inch pipe,along Everhart Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 3,059,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,059,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 917,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 917,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 306,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 306,000 Bond(5%) $ 153,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 153,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 306,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 306,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 459,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 459,000 Total S 5,201,300 S 0 S 0 S 5,201,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 119 of 238 Project:Santa Fe Section 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 8,915 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):49,420 Lift Station Sewershed:Oso WWTP 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):50,807 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 53,623 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 170 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Santa Fe Section 2 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 6,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 1,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 700 Bond(5%) $ 400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 400 OH&P(10°x) $ 700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 1,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,000 Total S 10,800 S 0 S 0 S 10,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 120 of 238 Project:Acushnet Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2380 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Acushnet in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,138,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,138,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 341,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 341,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 113,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 113,900 Bond(5%) $ 57,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 57,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 113,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 113,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 170,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 170,900 Total S 1,936,200 S 0 S 0 S 1,936,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 121 of 238 Project:Alley(Pvy) Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 350 LF of 20 inch pipe,660 LF of 24 inch pipe, 700 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Alley(Pvy)in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 805,400 $ 805,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 241,700 $ 241,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 80,600 $ 80,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,300 $ 40,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 80,600 $ 80,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 120,900 $ 120,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,369,500 S 1,369,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 122 of 238 Project:Braesvalley Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 970 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Braesvalley in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 317,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 317,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 95,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 95,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 31,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,800 Bond(5%) $ 15,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 31,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 47,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 47,700 Total S 540,100 S 0 S 0 S 540,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 123 of 238 Project:Everhart Section 3 Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2890 LF of 20 inch pipe,440 LF of 21 inch pipe,130 LF of 24 inch pipe,along Everhart Section 3 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 1,589,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,589,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 476,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 476,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 159,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 159,000 Bond(5%) $ 79,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 79,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 159,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 159,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 238,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 238,400 Total S 2,702,000 S 0 S 0 S 2,702,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 124 of 238 Project:Middlecoff Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1020 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Middlecoff in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 504,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 504,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 151,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 151,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 50,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,500 Bond(5%) $ 25,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 50,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 75,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,700 Total S 858,000 S 0 S 0 S 858,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project fi 125 of 238 Project:Sanders Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 180 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Sanders in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 87,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 87,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 26,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 26,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 8,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,800 Bond(5%) $ 4,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 8,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 13,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,200 Total S 149,100 S 0 S 0 S 149,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thtw Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 126 of 238 Project:Shadowbend Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 870 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Shadowbend in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 320,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 320,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 96,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 96,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 32,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,100 Bond(5%) $ 16,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 32,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 48,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,100 Total S 544,800 S 0 S 0 S 544,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project fi 127 of 238 Project:Staples Section 3 Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1170 LF of 24 inch pipe,5140 LF of 30 inch pipe, along Staples Section 3 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,266,500 $ 3,266,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 980,000 $ 980,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 326,700 $ 326,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 163,400 $ 163,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 326,700 $ 326,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 490,000 $ 490,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 5,553,300 S 5,553,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 128 of 238 Project:Timbergate Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1000 LF of 16 inch pipe,640 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Timbergate in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 589,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 589,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 176,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 176,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 59,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,000 Bond(5%) $ 29,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 59,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 88,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 88,500 Total S 1,002,400 S 0 S 0 S 1,002,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thtw Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project f 129 of 238 Project:Willowick Current Average Flow(gpm): 1,421 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm):3,300 Lift Station Sewershed:Station 5 WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):3,185 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):3,125 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1260 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Willowick in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 465,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 465,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 139,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 139,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 46,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,600 Bond(5%) $ 23,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 46,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 69,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,900 Total S 791,700 S 0 S 0 S 791,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 130 of 238 Project:Del Starr Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 610 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Del Starr in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 227,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 227,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 68,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 68,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 22,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,700 Bond(5%) $ 11,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 22,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 34,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 34,100 Total S 386,000 S 0 S 0 S 386,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 131 of 238 Project:Everhart Section 4 Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1100 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Everhart Section 4 in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 639,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 639,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 639,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 639,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 64,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,000 Bond(5%) $ 32,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 32,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 64,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 96,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 96,000 Total S 1,535,800 S 0 S 0 S 1,535,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 132 of 238 Project:Kerry Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1590 LF of 18 inch pipe,along Kerry in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 637,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 637,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 191,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 191,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 63,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,800 Bond(5%) $ 31,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 63,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 95,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 95,700 Total S 1,084,000 S 0 S 0 S 1,084,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 133 of 238 Project:Kingston Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2790 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Kingston in Oso W W TP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,380,300 $ 1,380,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,380,300 $ 1,380,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 138,100 $ 138,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,100 $ 69,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 138,100 $ 138,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 207,100 $ 207,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,313,000 S 3,313,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 134 of 238 Project:Limerick Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 550 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Limerick in Oso W W TP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 250,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 250,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 25,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,100 Bond(5%) $ 12,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 25,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 37,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 37,600 Total S 601,000 S 0 S 0 S 601,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 135 of 238 Project:O'Brian Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 860 LF of 18 inch pipe,along O'Brian in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 333,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 333,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 99,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 99,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 33,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,300 Bond(5%) $ 16,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 33,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 50,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,000 Total S 566,200 S 0 S 0 S 566,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 136 of 238 Project:Schanen Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 350 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Schanen in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 184,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 184,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 184,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 184,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 18,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,500 Bond(5%) $ 9,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 18,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 27,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,700 Total S 443,000 S 0 S 0 S 443,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 137 of 238 Project:Shea Current Average Flow(gpm): 5,637 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 15,000 Lift Station Sewershed:Williams WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,520 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:2280 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Shea in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 184,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 184,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 184,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 184,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 18,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,500 Bond(5%) $ 9,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 18,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 27,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,700 Total S 443,000 S 0 S 0 S 443,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 138 of 238 Project:Audra Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:260 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Audn in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 96,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 96,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 29,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 9,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,700 Bond(5%) $ 4,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 9,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 14,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,600 Total S 164,700 S 0 S 0 S 164,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 139 of 238 Project:Boardwalk Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 900 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Boardwalk in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 291,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 291,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 87,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 87,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 29,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,200 Bond(5%) $ 14,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 29,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 43,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,800 Total S 496,300 S 0 S 0 S 496,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 140 of 238 Project:Bollinger Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:420 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Bollinger in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 137,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 137,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 41,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 41,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 13,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,800 Bond(5%) $ 6,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 13,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 20,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,700 Total S 234,400 S 0 S 0 S 234,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 141 of 238 Project:Brockhampton Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 50 LF of 12 inch pipe,610 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Brockhampton in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 233,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 233,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 70,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 23,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,400 Bond(5%) $ 11,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 23,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 35,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,100 Total S 397,300 S 0 S 0 S 397,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 142 of 238 Project:Cimarron Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with:280 LF of 12 inch pipe,2370 LF of 24 inch pipe,4640 LF of 30 inch pipe,along Cimarron in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 3,504,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,504,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 1,051,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,051,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 350,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 350,500 Bond(5%) $ 175,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 175,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 350,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 350,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 525,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 525,700 Total S 5,957,600 S 0 S 0 S 5,957,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 143 of 238 Project:New Bedford Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 140 LF of 16 inch pipe,along New Bedford in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 45,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 13,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 4,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,600 Bond(5%) $ 2,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 4,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 6,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,900 Total S 77,600 S 0 S 0 S 77,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 144 of 238 Project:Queen Bess Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1130 LF of 20 inch pipe,along Queen Bess in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 458,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 458,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 137,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 137,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 45,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,900 Bond(5%) $ 23,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 45,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 68,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 68,800 Total S 779,400 S 0 S 0 S 779,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 145 of 238 Project:Stonehenge Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 730 LF of 12 inch pipe,820 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Stonehenge in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 463,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 463,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 139,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 139,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 46,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,400 Bond(5%) $ 23,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 46,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 69,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,600 Total S 788,200 S 0 S 0 S 788,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 146 of 238 Project:Strateford Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 660 LF of 16 inch pipe,along Strateford in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 223,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 223,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 67,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 22,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,400 Bond(5%) $ 11,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 22,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 33,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,600 Total S 380,500 S 0 S 0 S 380,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 147 of 238 Project:Washam Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Rehabilitate/Repair Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Near Term Justification&Description Rehabilitate/repair gravity pipes in order to meet current flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1050 LF of 12 inch pipe,along Washam in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 311,100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 311,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 93,400 $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 31,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,200 Bond(5%) $ 15,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 31,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 46,700 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,700 Total S 529,200 S 0 S 0 S 529,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: 'the cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 148 of 238 Project:Woolridge Current Average Flow(gpm):3,406 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14,280 Lift Station Sewershed:Wooldridge WW 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 14,848 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 15,080 Type:Upgrade Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Gravity Pipe Priority:Critical Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Upgrade gravity pipes in order to meet ultimate flow conditions.Replace existing pipe with: 1300 LF of 18 inch pipe,600 LF of 20 inch pipe, along Woolridge in Oso WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 933,200 $ 933,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 933,200 $ 933,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,400 $ 93,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,700 $ 46,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,400 $ 93,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,239,900 S 2,239,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 149 of 238 Project:Grav to Clarkwood South 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):217 Lift Station Sewershed:Clarkwood South 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):261 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):460 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 7300 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in Clarkwood South Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,189,100 $ 2,189,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 656,800 $ 656,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 328,400 $ 328,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,721,800 S 3,721,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 150 of 238 Project:Agnes St/Clarkwood Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):217 Lift Station Sewershed:Clarkwood South 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):261 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):460 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2500 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Clarkwood South Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 625,700 $ 625,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 187,800 $ 187,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,600 $ 62,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,300 $ 31,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,600 $ 62,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,900 $ 93,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,063,900 S 1,063,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 151 of 238 Project:Mann i ng Rd Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 6750 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,911,200 $ 1,911,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 573,400 $ 573,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 191,200 $ 191,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 95,600 $ 95,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 191,200 $ 191,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 286,700 $ 286,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,249,300 S 3,249,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thtw Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 152 of 238 Project:Grav to Stillwell Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1880 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,046,900 $ 1,046,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 314,100 $ 314,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 104,700 $ 104,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 52,400 $ 52,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 104,700 $ 104,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 157,100 $ 157,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,779,900 S 1,779,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 153 of 238 Project:Grav to HWY 77 LS Current Average Flow(gpm): 1 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway 77 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):960 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,999 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5290 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Highway 77 Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,269,500 $ 1,269,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 380,900 $ 380,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 127,000 $ 127,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,500 $ 63,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 127,000 $ 127,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 190,500 $ 190,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,158,400 S 2,158,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 154 of 238 Project:Grav to Lakes NW 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 14 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14 Lift Station Sewershed:Lakes Northwest 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):758 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,632 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1830 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Lakes Northwest Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 703,000 $ 703,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 210,900 $ 210,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,300 $ 70,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,200 $ 35,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,300 $ 70,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 105,500 $ 105,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,195,200 S 1,195,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 155 of 238 Project:Grav to Lakes NW 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 14 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14 Lift Station Sewershed:Lakes Northwest 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):758 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,632 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2510 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Lakes Northwest Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 679,000 $ 679,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 203,700 $ 203,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,900 $ 67,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,900 $ 67,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 101,900 $ 101,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,154,400 S 1,154,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thtw Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 156 of 238 Project:Yellow Oak Ave Grav Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2120 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 782,800 $ 782,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 234,900 $ 234,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,300 $ 78,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,200 $ 39,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,300 $ 78,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 117,500 $ 117,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,331,000 S 1,331,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 157 of 238 Project:Warrior Dr Grav Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1820 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 443,500 $ 443,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 133,100 $ 133,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 44,400 $ 44,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,200 $ 22,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 44,400 $ 44,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,600 $ 66,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 754,200 S 754,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 158 of 238 Project:NW Crossing Grav 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 88 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):485 Lift Station Sewershed:Northwest Crossing 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):818 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,634 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3810 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,620,200 $ 1,620,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 486,100 $ 486,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 162,100 $ 162,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 81,100 $ 81,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 162,100 $ 162,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 243,100 $ 243,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,754,700 S 2,754,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 159 of 238 Project:NW Crossing Grav 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 88 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):485 Lift Station Sewershed:Northwest Crossing 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):818 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,634 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3950 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,105,700 $ 3,105,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 931,800 $ 931,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 310,600 $ 310,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 155,300 $ 155,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 310,600 $ 310,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 465,900 $ 465,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 5,279,900 S 5,279,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 160 of 238 Project:NW Crossing Grav 3 Current Average Flow(gpm): 88 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):485 Lift Station Sewershed:Northwest Crossing 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):818 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,634 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3620 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,537,300 $ 1,537,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 461,200 $ 461,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 153,800 $ 153,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 76,900 $ 76,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 153,800 $ 153,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 230,600 $ 230,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,613,600 S 2,613,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 161 of 238 Project:Nueces Acres Grav Current Average Flow(gpm):28 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 114 Lift Station Sewershed:Nueces Acres 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):220 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):436 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5030 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,3820 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in Nueces Acres Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,315,700 $ 3,315,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 994,800 $ 994,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 331,600 $ 331,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 165,800 $ 165,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 331,600 $ 331,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 497,400 $ 497,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 5,636,900 S 5,636,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 162 of 238 Project:NW Crossing Grav 4 Current Average Flow(gpm): 88 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):485 Lift Station Sewershed:Northwest Crossing 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):818 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,634 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3540 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,206,600 $ 2,206,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 662,000 $ 662,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 220,700 $ 220,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 110,400 $ 110,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 220,700 $ 220,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 331,000 $ 331,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,751,400 S 3,751,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 163 of 238 Project:NW Crossing Grav 5 Current Average Flow(gpm): 88 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):485 Lift Station Sewershed:Northwest Crossing 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):818 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,634 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3360 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,1140 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 354,000 $ 354,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 106,200 $ 106,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,400 $ 35,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,700 $ 17,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,400 $ 35,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,100 $ 53,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 601,800 S 601,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 164 of 238 Project:Bronco Rd Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1580 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 395,000 $ 395,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,500 $ 118,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,500 $ 39,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,800 $ 19,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,500 $ 39,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,300 $ 59,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 671,600 S 671,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 165 of 238 Project:Grav to Allison Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 8960 LF of new 16 inch gravity pipe,in Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,673,500 $ 3,673,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,102,100 $ 1,102,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 367,400 $ 367,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 183,700 $ 183,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 367,400 $ 367,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 551,100 $ 551,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 6,245,200 S 6,245,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 166 of 238 Project:Calallen Center Grav Current Average Flow(gpm):0 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):0 Lift Station Sewershed:Calallen 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):564 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,504 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 11900 LF of new 20 inch gravity pipe,in Calallen Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,473,600 $ 5,473,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,642,100 $ 1,642,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 547,400 $ 547,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 273,700 $ 273,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 547,400 $ 547,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 821,100 $ 821,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 9,305,300 S 9,305,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 167 of 238 Project:Calallen East Grav Current Average Flow(gpm):0 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):0 Lift Station Sewershed:Calallen 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):564 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 5,504 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 8860 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Calallen Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,303,117 $ 2,303,117 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 691,000 $ 691,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 230,400 $ 230,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 115,200 $ 115,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 230,400 $ 230,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 345,500 $ 345,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,915,617 S 3,915,617 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 168 of 238 Project:Grav to Lakes NW 3 Current Average Flow(gpm):2 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14 Lift Station Sewershed:Lakes Northwest 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):758 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,632 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2190 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Lakes Northwest Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 679,300 $ 679,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 203,800 $ 203,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 68,000 $ 68,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 68,000 $ 68,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 101,900 $ 101,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,155,000 S 1,155,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 169 of 238 Project:NW Crossing Grav 5 Current Average Flow(gpm): 88 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):485 Lift Station Sewershed:Northwest Crossing 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):818 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,634 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3360 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,1140 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in Northwest Crossing Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,105,700 $ 3,105,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 931,800 $ 931,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 310,600 $ 310,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 155,300 $ 155,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 310,600 $ 310,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 465,900 $ 465,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 5,279,900 S 5,279,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 170 of 238 Project:Erne Street Current Average Flow(gpm):92 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):241 Lift Station Sewershed:Stillwell 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):257 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):782 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1790 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Stillwell Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 483,100 $ 483,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 145,000 $ 145,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,400 $ 48,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,200 $ 24,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,400 $ 48,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 72,500 $ 72,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 821,600 S 821,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 171 of 238 Project:New Grav Northwest/Hearn Current Average Flow(gpm):669 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm):4,747 Lift Station Sewershed:Sharpsburg S 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,609 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,850 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:4470 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe,in Sharpsburg S Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,836,000 $ 1,836,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 550,800 $ 550,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 183,600 $ 183,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,800 $ 91,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 183,600 $ 183,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 275,400 $ 275,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,121,200 S 3,121,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 172 of 238 Project:Future Grav To Allison Grav Current Average Flow(gpm):3,423 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 13,758 Lift Station Sewershed:Allison gravity 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 13,908 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,227 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 9080 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe,in Allison gravity Lift Station Shed in Allison Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,542,600 $ 3,542,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,062,800 $ 1,062,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 354,300 $ 354,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 177,200 $ 177,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 354,300 $ 354,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 531,400 $ 531,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 6,022,600 S 6,022,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 173 of 238 Project:Grav to LS1003 WWTP 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2830 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,032,300 $ 1,032,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 309,700 $ 309,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 103,300 $ 103,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 51,700 $ 51,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 103,300 $ 103,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 154,900 $ 154,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,755,200 S 1,755,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 174 of 238 Project:Grav to LS1003 WWTP 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2830 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 849,700 $ 849,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,500 $ 42,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 127,500 $ 127,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,444,700 S 1,444,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 175 of 238 Project:Grav to LS1003 WWTP 4_1 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3930 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,179,100 $ 1,179,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 353,800 $ 353,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,000 $ 118,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,000 $ 59,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,000 $ 118,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 176,900 $ 176,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,004,800 S 2,004,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 176 of 238 Project:Grav to LS1003 WWTP 4_2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2720 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 678,900 $ 678,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 203,700 $ 203,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,900 $ 67,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 67,900 $ 67,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 101,900 $ 101,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,154,300 S 1,154,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 177 of 238 Project:Grav to Coastal Meadows 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):41 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 197 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):236 Lift Station Sewershed:Coastal Meadows Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):745 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 16830 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe,in Coastal Meadows Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,378,300 $ 1,378,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 413,500 $ 413,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 137,900 $ 137,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,000 $ 69,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 137,900 $ 137,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 206,800 $ 206,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,343,400 S 2,343,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 178 of 238 Project:Grav to Coastal Meadows 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5300 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,393,800 $ 6,393,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,918,200 $ 1,918,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 639,400 $ 639,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 319,700 $ 319,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 639,400 $ 639,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 959,100 $ 959,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 10,869,600 S 10,869,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 179 of 238 Project:Future Bates Rd Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5030 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,208,000 $ 1,208,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 362,400 $ 362,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 120,800 $ 120,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 60,400 $ 60,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 120,800 $ 120,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 181,200 $ 181,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,053,600 S 2,053,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 180 of 238 Project:Grav to LS1003 WWTP 4_3 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2130 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-4 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 575,400 $ 575,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 172,700 $ 172,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 57,600 $ 57,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,800 $ 28,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 57,600 $ 57,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 86,400 $ 86,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 978,500 S 978,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 181 of 238 Project:Grav to Highway Nine 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine New LS 2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,219 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 9370 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Highway Nine New LS 2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,249,000 $ 2,249,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 674,700 $ 674,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 224,900 $ 224,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 112,500 $ 112,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 224,900 $ 224,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 337,400 $ 337,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,823,400 S 3,823,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 182 of 238 Project:Grav to Highway Nine 3 Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine New LS 2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,219 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3300 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Highway Nine New LS 2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 824,500 $ 824,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 247,400 $ 247,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 82,500 $ 82,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 41,300 $ 41,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 82,500 $ 82,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 123,700 $ 123,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,401,900 S 1,401,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 183 of 238 Project:Grav to Highway Nine 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine New LS 1 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):400 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:4560 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Highway Nine New LS 1 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,185,300 $ 1,185,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 355,600 $ 355,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,600 $ 118,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,300 $ 59,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,600 $ 118,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 177,800 $ 177,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,015,200 S 2,015,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 184 of 238 Project:Grav to LS 1003 WWTP 2 South Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:4160 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in WW-LS 1003 WWTP-2 Lift Station Shed in Greenwood Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,081,700 $ 1,081,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 324,600 $ 324,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 108,200 $ 108,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,100 $ 54,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 108,200 $ 108,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 162,300 $ 162,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,839,100 S 1,839,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 185 of 238 Project:Grav to Waldron 1 A Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 A Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,541 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:4890 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in New LS to Waldron IA Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,466,500 $ 1,466,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 440,000 $ 440,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 146,700 $ 146,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 73,400 $ 73,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 146,700 $ 146,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,493,300 S 2,493,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 186 of 238 Project:Lola Johnson Rd Current Average Flow(gpm):25 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 52 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):61 Lift Station Sewershed:Jamaica Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 177 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2380 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Jamaica Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 617,800 $ 617,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 185,400 $ 185,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 61,800 $ 61,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,900 $ 30,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 61,800 $ 61,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 92,700 $ 92,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,050,400 S 1,050,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 187 of 238 Project:Yorktown Blvd Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 B Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):700 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3280 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in New LS to Waldron 1B Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,111,800 $ 1,111,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 333,600 $ 333,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 111,200 $ 111,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,600 $ 55,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 111,200 $ 111,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 166,800 $ 166,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,890,200 S 1,890,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 188 of 238 Project:Glenoak Dr Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 B Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):700 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5720 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in New LS to Waldron 1B Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,715,800 $ 1,715,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 514,800 $ 514,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 171,600 $ 171,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,800 $ 85,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 171,600 $ 171,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 257,400 $ 257,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,917,000 S 2,917,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 189 of 238 Project:Roscher Rd Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 B Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):700 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 6510 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in New LS to Waldron 1B Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,866,600 $ 1,866,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 560,000 $ 560,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 186,700 $ 186,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 93,400 $ 93,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 186,700 $ 186,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,173,400 S 3,173,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fl 190 of 238 Project:Grav to Waldron 1 A-2 Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 A Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,541 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2220 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in New LS to Waldron IA Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 666,000 $ 666,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 199,800 $ 199,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,600 $ 66,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 33,300 $ 33,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,600 $ 66,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 99,900 $ 99,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,132,200 S 1,132,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 191 of 238 Project:New_Londonl Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5300 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,3800 LF of new 21 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,316,700 $ 3,316,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 995,100 $ 995,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 331,700 $ 331,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 165,900 $ 165,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 331,700 $ 331,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 497,600 $ 497,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 5,638,700 S 5,638,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 192 of 238 Project:New_London2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,905 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status: 10-year Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2000 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,2500 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe,2200 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,4700 LF of new 36 inch gravity pipe,5100 LF of new 48 inch gravity pipe, in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $11,163,500 $ 0 $11,163,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 3,349,100 $ 0 $ 3,349,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 1,116,400 $ 0 $ 1,116,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 558,200 $ 0 $ 558,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 1,116,400 $ 0 $ 1,116,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 1,674,600 $ 0 $ 1,674,600 Total S 0 S 18,978,200 S 0 S 18,978,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 193 of 238 Project:New_London3 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,905 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status: 10-year Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2000 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,1200 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe, 1500 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,1400 LF of new 30 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 1,710,600 $ 0 $ 1,710,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 513,200 $ 0 $ 513,200 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 171,100 $ 0 $ 171,100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 85,600 $ 0 $ 85,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 171,100 $ 0 $ 171,100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 256,600 $ 0 $ 256,600 Total S 0 S 2,908,200 S 0 S 2,908,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 194 of 238 Project:New_London4 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3000 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,1950 LF of new 36 inch gravity pipe,2360 LF of new 48 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,229,900 $ 1,229,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 369,000 $ 369,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 61,500 $ 61,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 184,500 $ 184,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,090,900 S 2,090,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 195 of 238 Project:New_London5 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 7900 LF of new 54 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,824,200 $ 7,824,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,347,300 $ 2,347,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 782,500 $ 782,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 391,300 $ 391,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 782,500 $ 782,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,173,700 $ 1,173,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 13,301,500 S 13,301,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 196 of 238 Project:New_London6 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status: 10-year Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2000 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,5300 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe,3100 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,2940 LF of new 36 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 5,622,700 $ 0 $ 5,622,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 1,686,900 $ 0 $ 1,686,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 562,300 $ 0 $ 562,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 281,200 $ 0 $ 281,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 562,300 $ 0 $ 562,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 843,500 $ 0 $ 843,500 Total S 0 S 9,558,900 S 0 S 9,558,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 197 of 238 Project:New_London7 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1500 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,9140 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,3500 LF of new 18 inch gravity pipe,1010 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,834,500 $ 4,834,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,450,400 $ 1,450,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 483,500 $ 483,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 241,800 $ 241,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 483,500 $ 483,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 725,200 $ 725,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 8,218,900 S 8,218,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 198 of 238 Project:New_London8 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,905 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status: 10-year Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3400 LF of new 42 inch gravity pipe,4760 LF of new 54 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 7,162,200 $ 0 $ 7,162,200 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 2,148,700 $ 0 $ 2,148,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 716,300 $ 0 $ 716,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 358,200 $ 0 $ 358,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 716,300 $ 0 $ 716,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 1,074,400 $ 0 $ 1,074,400 Total S 0 S 12,176,100 S 0 S 12,176,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project f 199 of 238 Project:New_London9 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,905 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2650 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,298,400 $ 1,298,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 389,600 $ 389,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,900 $ 129,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,900 $ 129,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 194,800 $ 194,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,207,600 S 2,207,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 200 of 238 Project:New_London10 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,905 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status: 10-year Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:4150 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,3900 LF of new 36 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 5,168,600 $ 0 $ 5,168,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 1,550,600 $ 0 $ 1,550,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 516,900 $ 0 $ 516,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 258,500 $ 0 $ 258,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 516,900 $ 0 $ 516,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 775,300 $ 0 $ 775,300 Total S 0 S 8,786,800 S 0 S 8,786,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 201 of 238 Project:New_Londonl 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):6,905 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 3300 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,617,000 $ 1,617,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 485,100 $ 485,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 161,700 $ 161,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 80,900 $ 80,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 161,700 $ 161,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 242,600 $ 242,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,749,000 S 2,749,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 202 of 238 Project:New_London12 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2370 LF of new 60 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,587,400 $ 2,587,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 776,300 $ 776,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 258,800 $ 258,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,400 $ 129,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 258,800 $ 258,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 388,200 $ 388,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 4,398,900 S 4,398,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 203 of 238 Project:New_London13 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:4840 LF of new 54 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,595,700 $ 4,595,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,378,800 $ 1,378,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 459,600 $ 459,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 229,800 $ 229,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 459,600 $ 459,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 689,400 $ 689,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 7,812,900 S 7,812,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 204 of 238 Project:New_London14 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 6450 LF of new 36 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,867,500 $ 3,867,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,160,300 $ 1,160,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 386,800 $ 386,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 193,400 $ 193,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 386,800 $ 386,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 580,200 $ 580,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 6,575,000 S 6,575,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 20.5 of 238 Project:New_London15 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1900 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,1500 LF of new 21 inch gravity pipe,2450 LF of new 24 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,252,600 $ 2,252,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 675,800 $ 675,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 225,300 $ 225,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 112,700 $ 112,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 225,300 $ 225,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 337,900 $ 337,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 3,829,600 S 3,829,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 206 of 238 Project:New_London16 Current Average Flow(gpm): 150 WWTP Service Area:London Current Peak Flow(gpm):21,920 Lift Station Sewershed:London 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,658 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 14,315 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1500 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,6810 LF of new 15 inch gravity pipe,in London Lift Station Shed in London Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,501,900 $ 2,501,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 750,600 $ 750,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,200 $ 250,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 125,100 $ 125,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,200 $ 250,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 375,300 $ 375,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 4,253,300 S 4,253,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 207 of 238 Project:New_Osol Current Average Flow(gpm): 524 WWTP Service Area:Oso Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,802 Lift Station Sewershed:Everhardt and Staples 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):5,263 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 8,725 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 50 LF of new 6 inch gravity pipe,in Everhardt and Staples Lift Station Shed in Oso Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,100 $ 16,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,900 $ 4,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,700 $ 1,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 900 $ 900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,700 $ 1,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 27,800 S 27,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 208 of 238 Project:New_Whitecapl Current Average Flow(gpm): 16 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 19 Lift Station Sewershed:Coquino Bay 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):232 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):323 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2830 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Coquino Bay Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 707,500 $ 707,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 212,300 $ 212,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,800 $ 70,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,400 $ 35,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,800 $ 70,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 106,200 $ 106,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,203,000 S 1,203,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 209 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 16 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 19 Lift Station Sewershed:Coquino Bay 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):232 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):323 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1600 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in Coquino Bay Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 399,100 $ 399,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 119,800 $ 119,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,900 $ 59,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 678,800 S 678,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 210 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap3 Current Average Flow(gpm):21 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):34 Lift Station Sewershed:Lake Padre South 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):60 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):291 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1310 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Lake Padre South Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 314,800 $ 314,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 94,500 $ 94,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,500 $ 31,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,800 $ 15,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,500 $ 31,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 47,300 $ 47,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 535,400 S 535,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 211 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap4 Current Average Flow(gpm):40 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):47 Lift Station Sewershed:Swordfish 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):89 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 89 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1710 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Swordfish Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 426,500 $ 426,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,700 $ 42,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,400 $ 21,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,700 $ 42,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,000 $ 64,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 725,300 S 725,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 212 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap5 Current Average Flow(gpm):38 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 188 Lift Station Sewershed:Verdeniar 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 188 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):278 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1410 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in Verdemar Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 352,700 $ 352,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 105,900 $ 105,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,300 $ 35,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,700 $ 17,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,300 $ 35,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,000 $ 53,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 599,900 S 599,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 213 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap6 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:To ModelMH 124020240 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 890 LF of new 6 inch gravity pipe,in To Mode1MH 124020240 Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 232,400 $ 232,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,800 $ 69,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,300 $ 23,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 $ 11,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 23,300 $ 23,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 34,900 $ 34,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 395,400 S 395,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 214 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap7 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:To ModelMH 124020240 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 560 LF of new 6 inch gravity pipe,in To Mode1MH 124020240 Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 146,900 $ 146,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 44,100 $ 44,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,700 $ 14,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,400 $ 7,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,700 $ 14,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,100 $ 22,100 Total S 0 S 0 S 249,900 S 249,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 21.5 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap8 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:To ModelMH 124020240 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1180 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in To Mode1MH 124020240 Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 283,100 $ 283,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,400 $ 28,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,200 $ 14,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,400 $ 28,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,500 $ 42,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 481,600 S 481,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 216 of 238 Project:New_Whitecap9 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:To ModelMH 124040580 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):496 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 1500 LF of new 10 inch gravity pipe,in To Mode1MH 124040580 Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 388,900 $ 388,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 116,700 $ 116,700 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,900 $ 38,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,500 $ 19,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,900 $ 38,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 58,400 $ 58,400 Total S 0 S 0 S 661,300 S 661,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 217 of 238 Project:New Whitecapl0 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:Zahn 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):749 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 800 LF of new 4 inch gravity pipe,in Zahn Lift Station Shed in Whitecap Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 800 $ 800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 300 $ 300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 200 $ 200 Total S 0 S 0 S 1,600 S 1,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 218 of 238 Project:New LS to Waldron 1 A Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 A Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,541 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Laguna Madre W W TP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 192,700 $ 192,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 57,900 $ 57,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,300 $ 19,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,700 $ 9,700 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,300 $ 19,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,000 $ 29,000 Total S 0 S 0 S 327,900 S 327,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 219 of 238 Project:New LS to Waldron 1 B Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 1 B Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):700 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Laguna Madre W W TP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 36,900 $ 36,900 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,300 $ 12,300 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,200 $ 6,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,300 $ 12,300 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 Total S 0 S 0 S 209,200 S 209,200 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 220 of 238 Project:New LS to Waldron 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):290 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Laguna Madre W W TP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,900 $ 91,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,600 $ 27,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,200 $ 9,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,600 $ 4,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,200 $ 9,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,800 $ 13,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 156,300 S 156,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 221 of 238 Project:New LS to G _1 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:GI Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):906 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Greenwood WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 387,800 $ 387,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 116,400 $ 116,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,800 $ 38,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,400 $ 19,400 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,800 $ 38,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 58,200 $ 58,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 659,400 S 659,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 222 of 238 Project:New LS to LS1003WWTP2 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Greenwood WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 428,500 $ 428,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 128,600 $ 128,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,900 $ 42,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,500 $ 21,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,900 $ 42,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 64,300 $ 64,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 728,700 S 728,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 223 of 238 Project:New LS to LS1003WWTP2-South Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS1003 WWTP-2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Greenwood WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 116,700 $ 116,700 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,100 $ 35,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 $ 11,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,900 $ 5,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,700 $ 11,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,600 $ 17,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 198,700 S 198,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 224 of 238 Project:New LS to WW-LS]003 WWTP-4 Current Average Flow(gpm):2,664 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm):31,041 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):31,717 Lift Station Sewershed:WW-LS1003 WWTP-4 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):34,599 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Greenwood WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 479,100 $ 479,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 143,800 $ 143,800 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,000 $ 24,000 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,900 $ 71,900 Total S 0 S 0 S 814,800 S 814,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 22.5 of 238 Project:New LS to Coquina Bay 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 16 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 19 Lift Station Sewershed:Coquino Bay 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):232 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):323 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 208,500 $ 208,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,600 $ 62,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,900 $ 20,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,900 $ 20,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,300 $ 31,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 354,700 S 354,700 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainalle Area Flows: Project 1f 226 of 238 Project:New LS to Coquina Bay 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 16 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 19 Lift Station Sewershed:Coquino Bay 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):232 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):323 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 285,100 $ 285,100 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,600 $ 85,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,600 $ 28,600 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,300 $ 14,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,600 $ 28,600 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,800 $ 42,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 485,000 S 485,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project fi 227 of 238 Project:New LS to Zahn 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:Zahn 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):749 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 301,500 $ 301,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 90,500 $ 90,500 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,200 $ 30,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,100 $ 15,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,200 $ 30,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,300 $ 45,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 512,800 S 512,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 228 of 238 Project:New LS to Verdemar Current Average Flow(gpm):38 WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm): 188 Lift Station Sewershed:Verdemar 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 188 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):278 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 144,400 $ 144,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,400 $ 43,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,300 $ 7,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,700 $ 21,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 245,800 S 245,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 229 of 238 Project:New LS to MH 240 1 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:MH 240 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 181,300 $ 181,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,400 $ 54,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,200 $ 18,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,100 $ 9,100 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,200 $ 18,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,200 $ 27,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 308,400 S 308,400 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 230 of 238 Project:New LS to MH 240 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:MH 240 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 144,300 $ 144,300 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,300 $ 43,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,300 $ 7,300 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,700 $ 21,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 245,600 S 245,600 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 231 of 238 Project:New LS to MH 240 3 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:MH 240 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):456 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 208,600 $ 208,600 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,600 $ 62,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,900 $ 20,900 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,900 $ 20,900 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,300 $ 31,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 354,800 S 354,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 232 of 238 Project:New LS to Highway Nine 1 Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):400 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Greenwood WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 196,800 $ 196,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,100 $ 59,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,700 $ 19,700 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,900 $ 9,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,700 $ 19,700 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 29,600 $ 29,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 334,800 S 334,800 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 233 of 238 Project:New LS to Highway Nine 2 Current Average Flow(gpm): 52 WWTP Service Area:Greenwood Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,031 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,178 Lift Station Sewershed:Highway Nine Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,219 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Greenwood WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 394,500 $ 394,500 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 118,400 $ 118,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,500 $ 39,500 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,800 $ 19,800 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,500 $ 39,500 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 59,200 $ 59,200 Total S 0 S 0 S 670,900 S 670,900 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 234 of 238 Project:New LS to MH 580 Current Average Flow(gpm):No Data Available WWTP Service Area:Whitecap Current Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Lift Station Sewershed:MH 580 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):No Data Available Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):496 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Whitecap WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 283,400 $ 283,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 85,100 $ 85,100 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,400 $ 28,400 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 14,200 $ 14,200 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,400 $ 28,400 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,600 $ 42,600 Total S 0 S 0 S 482,100 S 482,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project 1f 23.5 of 238 Project:Lakes NW LS Current Average Flow(gpm):2 WWTP Service Area:Allison Current Peak Flow(gpm): 14 Lift Station Sewershed:Lakes Northwest 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):758 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):404 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Lift Priority:Future Station and Force Main Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Lift Station and Force Main in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install new Lift Station and Force Main in Allison WWTP Service Area Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,900 $ 91,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,600 $ 27,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,200 $ 9,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,600 $ 4,600 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,200 $ 9,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,800 $ 13,800 Total S 0 S 0 S 156,300 S 156,300 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 236 of 238 Project:Flour Bluff Rd Current Average Flow(gpm): 162 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm):647 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm):668 Lift Station Sewershed:Flour Bluff Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm):734 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 5250 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Flour Bluff Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,417,900 $ 1,417,900 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 425,400 $ 425,400 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 141,800 $ 141,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 70,900 $ 70,900 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 141,800 $ 141,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 212,700 $ 212,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 2,410,500 S 2,410,500 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 237 of 238 Project:Grav to Waldron 2 Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:New LS to Waldron 2 Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,541 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install:2160 LF of new 8 inch gravity pipe,in New LS to Waldron 2 Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 561,800 $ 561,800 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 168,600 $ 168,600 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,200 $ 56,200 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,200 $ 56,200 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 84,300 $ 84,300 Total S 0 S 0 S 927,100 S 927,100 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. 2022 thru Ultimate Growth Capital Improvement Plan City of Corpus Christi, Texas Overall Lift Station Drainage Area Flows: Project tl 238 of 238 Project:Grav to Waldron Current Average Flow(gpm):202 WWTP Service Area:Laguna Madre Current Peak Flow(gpm): 1,615 10-Year Peak Flow(gpm): 1,732 Lift Station Sewershed:Grav to Waldron Ultimate Peak Flow(gpm): 1,541 Type:Future Project Department:Wastewater Useful Life:50 years Contact:Director of Water Utilities Category:Future Gravity Priority:Future Pipe Status:Ultimate Justification&Description Install new Gravity Pipes in order to meet demands generated from anticipated growth.Install: 8660 LF of new 12 inch gravity pipe,in Grav to Waldron Lift Station Shed in Laguna Madre Basin WWTP Service Area. Expenditures 2022-2024 2025-2031 Ultimate Total Direct Construction Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,597,400 $ 2,597,400 Contingency(30°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 779,300 $ 779,300 Mobilization(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 259,800 $ 259,800 Bond(5%) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 OH&P(10°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 259,800 $ 259,800 Design&Inspection(15°x) $ 0 $ 0 $ 389,700 $ 389,700 Total S 0 S 0 S 4,286,000 S 4,286,000 Funding Sources 2022-2024 2025-2026 Ultimate Total Total NOTE: The cost projections listed have been developed for rough proportionality calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Corpus Christi.The cost projections use costs for 2023 and do not account for inflation. Appendix D. Individual Project Maps _ Legend g n Ups¢e Gravity Ppes O N o Rincon r♦NearT m = a Bayou Ultimate all-in Lift Station 3 No Improvements Remmmended Q W l J A Improvements Remmmmded C W o wwreGraviyAeinLU Z _ —. New Lit Station — • acs F. n,Force Men Q I Cynthia \ =acting FM a W - e wwm Service Ac. 3 ow Ex'sfln9 12wity Pipes RaWoo m River Clr S 9� Up River Road an Y n \ D"-36" xistin FM - LLr 'arp�burg6-rpt \ ,--_ Allison ___ Sh WWTP —>36" 166 Upsae ,A,;�F ,lam „� 3 -t,�;y'"u Allison ■waste warerreannenrornt m 7 v ®AtGUz .r 188 i3 7 W W TP t FUWre Laid Use for.rens me mcrense m flow a .Lakes 163v �� ?8 43- s oev Employment Northwest Highway 77 �i� on iraaer r Residential 11 Solar Estates _ U) M 161 4 N Off. O cOjpty Roatl 4a 'Dr m Clarkwood �St II II�� U _— 169 North 43 0 4Northwe t,,�,..;:N n p 183 U a ® N N crossing U)�// by1\ ,^ V/ M1 k North San m � ,L° 2s� High an y i Pedro taco 3 - N N / Nines +�+ at P a � �' N S ' < z ' / U) Ro bSLOWn EMa'rn Ave m De Dietrich 15 22„9. Dakota St - violet Tx-a4w N_- �. �N ZB� NueA'fPort nH m Clarkwood N/ �~ a OOOOLO F _ South n o.o Aug2023 a � © o�siox Ea RW 3� Y1 ox J E Po'iard Rd � _ 0 1,000 ow,wx AA s� Feet E AA 178 1 a° Rincon North North Beach"E„ Legend g " �^ Solar Estates Ul Gra ity Ppes m iQ Rincon South � ear gm s y.161 "j North Beach"D" ulflmate N sees Acr YJ� /7 c Orth LiftSbhon fa p f0 rBeach C A NO Imp—emente Recemmended Q LUIN z 0 +St ove -Improvements Remminni W 0 a Clk tl North North Beach B --QN rthw—C—C—,mg 43 ® 9 wwrecravty roan Z 169 ��•�o 983 �� Nueces NewufeStamn a _ N N IN a v�✓6� McBride 7B Resaca a Be Peoples =Enwre E4rce Man 190 '� y y Street =Exsun FM Q W W e Highway tJiri .R -nc 9 a 162 / )y Charlie'? ry e® Q L re e T Head Mwww Servce Nea o I� � Place= Sheet T„Head+ Exkflng Gravity Pipes a� De Dietrich H N h Studebaker tp, ' o IN a s. Coopers —Ls za _ q 6¶ �Levll = r Alley —D 36” y ® wood CIn PIArA�P t I85 m P ® ,County 6 Mlr "i ea —w36 _ -5411 ! gan _ Coe Parkrite Water TreaMent Plant Clark ®AICUZ w South P ^ 179 I m' Oleander wwre laid use for ar.s the nu�sen flow nt 222 i Employme --, a A dig Residential V A London London „o V Lift Lift "*,,1,2 0 - N Station Station ' ✓� 9ceEo:❑k P`ort/Pear �00 '�,, 0 1771 y�o aI o v c� A O -`u>\TrojanQ „0ry w U) 7"p a Rose Acres 175 Lexington wf p`h L w sk t1 ro R U CoastaleF L N 30 Meadows rri6 .� Everhart/Staples 0 fies 014 Sa ky ¢", - 0j� O Gr ee/w'od WWTF{ 1 p� �� TAMUCC U 0 YO O WWTP#z Oso N r y �3- K toryz 4 WWTP# s U 8 'w R4 obi 9 C" rr=ck1 W0 Scha en ✓��;�. 'w P Bay London Lift �o 9� ✓ `N lliams ) �/ +�+ j Tierra Grande Stat on 1®� �� ? w ',`� ' 8 do ry�o'ed ` Webers Gl / W Idr Z� �? 7q fi65 �� 201 I �4g Place London or East � aenfields By �T' All, The Le. )? y The Ba 96,P0yQWooldridge II Ns M Buck ingh m IN �. �0S N Cimma,. .4 ® 93 Z'' a 000040 a 20 1955ry o Au92023 <$ n2D6 }lough b ryi y8B sRW 71— AA IN AA ao Feet a a 81/ I E Lege 11- 179 F - - 1�r/`ls� UpsaeGravtyPpee Z 8 cot Ill Oleander Near Tm a� 222, LLi t z p Ultimate _ c��I w Stetim, _ r c A is Arc �No Improvement Recommended Q W 7( Improvemmte Remmmmded C LU FUWre Gravty Man >28s London Lift 12 W i NeWLmsation .Station t Port/Pearse' 3' � 'j a A / 1 FUWre Force Man ¢ -IlLond Lift p� ^ asting FM a 2 5 / Station N _tl w w� �WWTP ServceArea �Y o 177 ? 0] \ E%'sting Grav ty P pee S z ll Q A� 124 � w w � Coastal � + 6 w e Meadows Q p —Ls 3 S �� ✓ n —D 36' l� i i —136 Waste Water TreaMent Plant RM ✓ A� / ®AIGUz �8 ve hart/Stapl 17 Fnwre Laid use for ar.s the ncn—ntlow �ae Sacky re''> Employment ,,^^ Residential V G're'e'nwoodWWTP 8. pY "T .� X331�y Gsoe/ TAMUCC Cir". vp 9 y Dso wwrr# Asx O • ` Oso WWTP#i d Kost y Schan 't t ' caba�ssFem �- en Pelican Bay oe U Country Club Wllliams� 7 an o� tr j L don Lift Estates �' \: / r� y St tion 7�8 j,,,.� ,,.,.4 Sug o 56 Q ° ! 797 / Webc A y Perry P ase chor Habor Co E O Gulf Winds Goff U Weber Rd Weber Rtl r jay r n� 6 N #+� „? c4c4 728 1 48 ...: Turtle C e�I f/1 y m �aThe Lakes a L1'J' '"u ✓��M try/1B (n ste - / London East "��48 rfields 76+ &'ay�Wool dr'idge Travel Tra ��r E'.:.ff Lagun Madre . W WT� S s"'le ad L71:J 7�1 1,19B wry ? 88 G�yP k Waldron Road N g INIlk® �, ✓ ! d s 93 &Iuffa a 195 Pa wry' h rb R''�Rh tta PlaceN ( 206 pies 4'- 0 Pu'due X88 A-lar"anca(Online 8 - �N at Ut te) a 000000_`•0 IRI�III Hu92023 r K g Cro 3 rry o,s s aw 0 1,000 w AA 78 wa�droo Fief° Laguna Shor 1 ® E 3 B Feet Legend g Ups¢e Gravity Ppes F Near T a Ultimate Rincon North N tLiftFi Beach"E" station 3 € ✓I NO lmprovemen�Remmmended Q W Imp rovemm�Remmmmded C W o FUWre Gravty Man 11,� Rincon South + New Ldt station �1 s'arieson sr North Beach"D" =FUWre Force Main 2 ° Ba 1„ E Nay.9atlo,B,vu ': =Ex'sflng FM a - ffM WWW Service Area o me Fortin,me l traae coma" North Beach"C" Existing Gravity Pipes a —42" o gh I5"-24" e�tNse`m� W,F-on,tI Traae rorrlrNorth Beach"B'„;�� —v^_36^ >36” Port of Corpus Waste Water Treatment Plant chnsti-Nonhsld, ®AICUZ $7 FUWre Laid Use for areas the increase in flow 9 Employment ,^ kcsdential V M£Bride Nueces Bay P a � eF a` T z a irUl ms ' s_ Charles ° - Place r pOl An L,spa 48 f ��Peoples Street'T'Head I` fJJI; � W� � o C �La ence Street'T'Head ML' Studebaker V r I E O nlemora clay �+ Fin M Coopers Alley L Head +�+ r ti g 221 n3Lr� 63` �� s Morgan rh m g t C Ie Park 4 0 c u gcwcst ° oar r- N Campus hdieaee We 179 Oleander * Au92023 U L.—,E6olr �a 0 u 1,000 AA R� 222 ®� AA Feet E 4 a° ege d g 4 A Perry Place Ul Gravry Ppm 2 16X Near T m 0 a )y ..•' --- Ultimate y LL Lift Sbhon F i No Improvement Recommended a ♦ QW /j / ♦Imp F.Wn,emm�Recommended 0 W o N—LicStab Man W Z New, Station CL tz FUWre Force Man Q Exshng FM 4 W o rl,Il r B c F� WWW Sery o,Area o a` Laguna Madre W WTP Ex'sdng G—ifty P Pg <12 G W ?38 —IS-24" o 27 36" 136 Gateway Park ® ® �Waste Water Treahnent Plant Atwood Par ® AICUZ FUWre Laid L.d o „ Use for areas the in flow Employment 0 V B3 c] ry Flour Bluff 7 V RhettaFPlace �� Purdue �8s ✓✓✓ d i ' ti a�oa y y e'en„ (O line at ultimate) J ?aB �� f s 9la"sa R H Q ro R U p" o a6 U P y waldroo Field Laguna5hores 1'4 (n 3 L 3 24ft enaN 1✓� /� s / a 0000ao Rex r � � Aug 2023 u js` s RW 0 1,000 AA ® AA ao Feet 5 ka Legend 2 8 R n Ups¢e Gravity Ppes 9 m Kennedy Causeway r_Near Tm p Q r_utionlflmate W y Lik Sta Kennedy Causeway 11 Z a^acl, NO lmprovementsRemmmended Q W g Improvements Remmmmded 0 W o R ( � Packery Pointe Future Gravity Main Z _ ka'ti� e ark i New Lift Station CL� o Sea horsdij raj ry =Fuwre F.—Main Q ry =asung as 4 W ffWWW Service Area o �8-�r1 Verd emGravity ear E.isUng Pipes IS z J tkfish� R A <=1r' a 23" h 2,� ss —n"-36" N —>36" Waste Water Tr- mt Plant N ®AICUZ �,Zg_ �--y-��4 Fnwre Lund Use for arms me mase in flow Employment ,^ jos >✓`� N Residential ++ �Z V Park Road as N O eward a fn M WhitecapWWTP Upsize Lake Padre L j Existini FM 19 South O- Padre Island O Sectionq V 8 n € o O U) U ro nana Z,, �YPsY j � R N r+ u na Ba aaCoa—_ a y park Sea Pines N �8 e1 H1,2023 0 1,000 AA 8Jt ® E AA a o Feet k46 2 am mm q LU 0 UA o. CL(z LZU owH 59ft 2 Clarkwood North orth 0 U Legend II Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Ci Near Term —12" Ultimate NN Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant CL FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 —Future Force Main Employment —Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 1 Cynthia4 LU 0 UA Mi Uj CL. LU 16 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment 000—o-o si Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA ao Feet 2 DI—1 I LU LL Murphy USA LU Wamat L41 8 .�2 Prof. r0j 153 2 U) LO Cc U 0 U E X U) > U � CIO Legend Upie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes I _ , U) �e Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA as –––––– C isR Feet 3 N6w LU 0 LU wild— Z t )-gh,— LU 0 , L4, G Prof,4 UP, Z. ———————— Xisti" a . __j FM POL V 153 Pro 5 3 L I cc U 0 vabey vie,v D, La e Northwest 1-11ey view c, aee CID Lege.d Upie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near e Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow nue 2023 Future Force Main Employment ------------ zt, Existing FM Residential --0 1,000- AA AA o Feet 4 QW OZ LU LLI 8 River Canyon* N H Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimateayy Lift Station 27"-36" L, A No Improvements Recommended >36" Pio c A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential N AA 1,000 AA Feet 5 q LU 0 UA tu CL LU G Up River Road 0 Existing 2 upsi, o- pal. ayi Ln up River Rtl 0 U fn Legend Upsie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near e Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 2 AA o Feet 6 bl�tl Legend 8 Ups¢e G—ty Pq— Near To,'m O m �q so �ulflmate y y € °e lua i, oma S G/enact Lift Station j e0� No Impr —.e Remmmmded QW H-E-6 t is�, - - Imp rovemm�Remmmmded 0 W o -s FnmreG—tyre. Z New MStahon CL,wV rce N F. m FoMain 5c'stln � � Zto Y g FM 4 1„ 9 nSt eyS` � � Ex'sflmg Gravity Pipes �1 oly GaJ � aeS SIS"-24" o C Sal»s 581t �ln�ods' Hey Dark 1-4D"-36 Del Mar —>36" soe acts k' T��'qb/ass C�o vele East Sy Arca is ' \ ✓ng Waste Water TreaMmtPlant ®AICUZ eia 9 SR m W FUWre Laid Use for arms the incrmse in flow a Wry�t Employment eo/kka a/ O` 9p� 4 Residentral � Jmoor 'a 35R R" V Park L O q`k�� la'',sco Meat d Rob'a Or ,r4o a� Cr,Pus Christi harket& y N Wholesale a Gi ocery Mart c po V 2T Mt—Des'a q`ilnq,o'tC 5 L Soo Tai\ 6a ., th an Q .32ft R O o� o y X C.ea•; N d e L H a Home Depot kid co 3 € a aBela, Park ', c i8 V R 4 r .o' ^oo �8 'Z B a� i�tl a OOOOLO a Port/Ped Ce a5[re, * Aug 2023 0 1,000� A AA AA ao F Feet �a 2 E a a m b.. tf � %� /f✓ / ` / � O W o " WLu Z n r� P 11 %,% �. L i N �y U Q U a %ffjj�rv/ 1/ .,V / t upsb*C-4 Pipet B-U4 a-anty Ptpes G,n it lM6naM —IS"-Zd' ��//// ` ''�F�r•-.� (�J' Lift SYd- —2r-3e 38 A.JYo LnpruueinmxsY rammed —r36' ` i W a 000040 lmp.-omivne R.mm�rend d f W.V,Water 7 trnaK Plan[ r,/ 1 ` FUWreG—ityMain yJ AICUZ I RW 3 Hew lift Station RA—L d Use'mr areas die intreax in fbr. './ / F '� ♦ . a AA ure ov wx ? �+FutForce Main E�play-+rent a%! ►� E nn o ..Existing RM ftesdenvel .l �© ax�xEo �Z. = s a am �m n u mm � ao m� W ¢ OZFRE CELL, o a� o� N¢ j L Q / N U 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes a �Near Term <=12" —Ultimate —15"-24" Lift Station —27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ,oa.o. 0000ao a � New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow oai[ nue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment s RVy e3 of o..a & >a Ein FM Residential nn ®G cxEcrcEo AA a o Feet E 9 za m e " " 3 •C � �f�" �� 44-' ,..A ✓!✓,,:�-('_✓-".A "'cn �^'vl'r� �/ ✓`i h f fig`A.�7 t�'�✓'i_ � /�' /"i f '`._ "Z✓\�t �� > RR W 3 WZLU o ra b t Q 2 Ozz e r A 0 ea B V 4ir M a _ N H S. re q' 7 I�' 36•` �+say i w " s �n 9' `o U 'ea E a a ado soV o r@f Plr 7 r - ,n h P u111 � V, 9 p v c CCB ball•`. Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes N ` Near Term m Ultimate SIS'-24" Kostor'�jz D• ^' Lift Station —27"-36" Sara A No Improvements Recommended —>36" �O9a ejLa N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II C g Futu a Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0 000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J , All 2023 Future Farce Main Employment � s RW a Ex sten FM Residential - „ HH 0 1,000 AA Feet E 10 - 8 McBr_dem O 0 =" JF41 H 41 OW o 12 h WL? QW LULU LU a2 - LU s7ft 2 0- = U) rt Pea4e� U > V) .16ft I 1 - -. S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 611 V) Near Term —12" Ultimate 15"-24" Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" t A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant nP Ra Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000-o New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow nue 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA vAA Feet 12 ,D S&Ckyacky N OLU UA Ck.tz LU 2 we Fury Q O 90�hP G AV t > U V) 5,,,,y Park 28# Legend 28ft Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA Feet 3 vt\ A\�Av�v3 �� dw \\� LU 01\0-\, \\ \ \ <a \ \ a \ X\\ \i O Proj.14 U y t Laguna (� .v Shores 7 Q O E U N U V) 4R L 3 � 9 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term <=12" N m �Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment si RW x >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 AA ao \ Feet E 14 za — a Z s 41, O m U) W Q LU 4W o= a� / � U L y j '14)y ? IlzU S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term m �Ultimate „Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ,IIy1I1�j g FUWfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Laguna11'^JII .ogue 2023 z Future Farce Main Employment ' ,/ si RW >Q Existing FM Residential MadreWWTP A qq 0 1,000 ® qq o Feet a° 15 Everhart/Staples Z a W o0 y �Ws e q, w U N O a aay` N N U L y Q 0 U r 0 U Cn 3 nd L 9 "4 S Legend I' Ups ze Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12 / ~"` N Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" ' No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry Q a 0000-0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employmentsi RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA °` Feet E 16 QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU U size Existing FM y Legend U,,ie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes NearTerm —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA o Feet 17 RW 0 UA CL(z LU Aye V Jac Pr0j, �VA Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" No Improvements Recommended >36" Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA Feet 18 QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU OG PAX 19,1" whit,c.p Blvd --p B,d Whltv— Pa, Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AAD 1,000 AA o Feet 19 8 a � R LU a W o� e Seahorse o Q\ \ �� a s a W w � V L s a LV! L y 7 Q , 0 � o _r a N N S Legend w` a "R Ups ze Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term m Ultimate NLift Station 27'-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant �Iy�I^^I1II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ �NQ a o000a0 M New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 'u^^J ogue 2023 a Future Farce Main Employment s 00 >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet E 20 za W Ly rlU r a W 3 ^� o P w..'j1 ami 6 B o r' 3 L 3 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes > Near Term m Ultimate IS-24" Lift Station 27'-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" i O Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant I1� o g • Future Gravity Man ®AICUZ Qo 0000ao a I* New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow� i`°' o oai[ nue 2011 z —Future Farce Main Employment e,x si RW —Existing FM Residential 1,000 nn AA ao Feet 21 a° QW ¢ OZ o :LL, - N V N O Q U U Cn 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq o Feet 22 za PA, LU GW Pr Oil. Ck. LU on G up.iz. Prof-6 zi-a-ri------ Existing FM Sharpsburg c3l U opo 4 o U Ile E U) > U V) 0 0', Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" V) Ultimate Lift Station X27'-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" ro N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential1,000 AA AA Feet 23 LU OZ :LL, S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet o �sC QW OZLU o a2 W - Cn�r Pa Ce et0 p a 30 l �fiispa`ee D L Q U U \ Cn 3 \ L O � S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" �\ Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ o er a 000010 •r New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow gu�2023 z —Future Farce Main Employment a 0� si ROy —Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq ao Feet 25 Cat* LU 0 UA Ck.tz LZU O Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA ao 'feelRe " 26 73it Q LU 0 UA LU CL(z LZU t O EINS RIN Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM "0 Residential AA v. 0 00 ® -11Eo AA a_ wFeet 27 Clarkwood N North W still-11 LU CL 0 LLI Northwest Pr0j. Proj.169 crossing G Proj.43 ♦ N 163 6 :LL, St' e Oj-43 N 0 Proj. 170 CL 8 N pros-232 N X CL L V) a cc Legend Upsiz Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term P10j.15 Ultimate —15-24" Lift Station —27"-36" N A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Z6 Future Gravity Main AICUZ 0000-o New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in fic A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 Ea AA ood ex erc.o AA Feet 28 6' Cat* LU Up R-I Rd Uj Z Ary ss Ry CL tz LU G 37 I.3jq cess Ry 8 CV 11 IX cc �37� 0 U E 16 V) > U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Aug 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA o Feet 29 LU Ly LU :LL, ow IX 94 N Cc U 0 U E V) Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet Proj. 33 F LU UA LU Ck.tz LU cv /I 2 Ramos 0- = U) P'.j. q 0 U 16 sad Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet LU ED LLI H t 8 CL . - U) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 1, AA oo o AA o Feet 32 q LU 0 UA Ck.tz LU O Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet 13__ QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU O Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet 34 - eCog1 y H a LU ....Tlft� CL,w a 4W 1 a� .a ,d (7 U O � � t � U Q L y GD � 0 o e = U a 0 6 II � r o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 •r New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zss Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq o Feet 35 za q LU 0 UA Ck.tz LZU O Pro/ 36 to.-- Cc U fit 0 U E V) V) cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" (2, A No Improvements Recommended >36" N. Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant A Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA o Feet 6 y LU LU \_ aCL z o� N U N O N H N � U L y Q 0 3 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g FUWfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq ao ®rn Feet 37 Al a° mrn QW ¢ 0 U o CLtz s m W =� �- �� T �� a //lTt lUt tit i� y { 11 \\\�� rllr tiro � � ��s i tett U a� O N H N U L y Q U X o N U Cn le +�+ Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" 17,t `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 0000.0 w New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zss Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA Oao Feet< y. sxE� 38 e rQ. Prof: 1?1 0 N-hwBald LU 0 UA Uj CL tz LU O 0 U 16 X Pro]. 39 fn R Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes U) Near Term —12" iiii Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvement Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet 39 Prof:34 Diu. 4 LU o UA Ck.tz Proi. 36 LU to.—— fir 8 Lo U u) 0 U X Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 40 Q LU 0 UA Ck.tz Pads 4 LU M.43 O i6iry G. Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N Waste Water Treatment Plant A Improvements Recommended N Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow pug 2023 Future Force Main Employment CL si — A o A Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA o Feet 41 Proj Din.=16in 43 4 QW CL LU Aro v 8 .2 �49 A N CL 0 E V) > cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1111 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 Proj. 170 AA Feet 42 W 0U o CL.tz 4W N 7 N Stillwell 0 a •- M pool.q ) t Din.=16in t4 U Q U N o N U 3 L 3 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ^J .o A.g 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si Rw >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA o Feet 43 r,a W OZ o a2 W - N V N O fro y H 1, as U Q U N o y U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq o Feet E 44 ka _ W 0 U o Ck.tz LU 4Z a N 43h V U O a H._ N 45 U - Din.=16in s=a o�s, Din.=022 kr i y p P a J s _a N U 9 L t Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" -- -- N m L7 Ultimate £ pLift S ztation 27"-36" �J ' N A No Improvements Recommended —>36" E 1 A Improvements Recommended M Waste Water Treatment Plant _-- g Future Gravity Man ®AICUZ _ a o000a0 New Lift Stat m Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Future Farce Main Employment .o qug 2023 z >a si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® qq a o Feet �a E 45 a c � e W WCL� o 1`5 '3>4 esRtl ,,rt o e �1i G% a, a a , coou�•,o:ai (� r' ear,•:rtea � s ,c 1-37n«e.saa � s Pcb .45h e 0 0 Q� P „40 N H N Dia. 3Uln O'•C FJ o L N o n a a U — a — fn 3 L Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate ZarskyCLoumber Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ L 11 S: Q a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow - ''^f .o Ads 2023 z >Q Future Force Main Employment si RW >Q Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 H,ly Cross ® E AA ae Ce te�y Feet E 46 q LU PC*416 0 UA LU CL. fn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate 4e Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000-0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment 9h si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet LU 02 2 CL(z LU Parti 1 Oak8 Graham Park E 1, C Prof.48 Q U L11p,11 St 48 ,-,0 D10in 10 AnI ia. 2 1 4) > U V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term NoNN Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvement Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 NN New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A..1— Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 A A AA ao cion Feet 48 2 s� QW 0 U o 4Z o� \ 1 o`° N l / U / •0 P!' N / N Prof.46 U _---_--- L N 0 U o N U 3 3 9 Legend a Ups ze Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" m Ultimate Lift Station 27 -36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" - N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant 3 Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 New Lft Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .ogug 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment si RW a Existing FM r�� Residential „ qq Naa 0 1 000 Leooartl St t qq w6 E ao I.eopare se Feet 49 ka a 46 Leap Z s a � a Dia. 24in _ O\d pobscown Rd �e�o _ �N z W — OW o� ARLP Rd R� % s 4W o= PJ V ' a 4,/ N y f4 L y Q N U V) 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow +� ''^J .ogue 2023 Future Farce Main Employment SJI si RW >a Existing FM Residentia I - „ AA 0 000 qq ao E Feet 50 za LU UA o P onio.,,a,.i W n� ro r� X11 QZ o ryOp Prod' G PrOJ, )g 0in.=20in N d.c McBri e c o h y rLady a w O 'chn:t, eat co, Q h d r MOO L N 7 �� Q w 1 N` Hccess kn = O Q1 x 69)1 �rx131 (n e Charlie's Place jz Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ a�Near Term —12" - Ultimate Is"-za" A�of Lift Station 27"-36" a A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant �ry Iy^II(y/C g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ott-o New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow '^J , �Proj.4® Q` O� Au92023 Future Force Main Employment StArExisting FM Residential aIn.=10in O�0 1,000 rcrcAwx AA Rk .; Q� ® E AA aH e _.... cx crcEo 4 Feet E 51 a- N LU 0 LLI LU LLI 40 U E V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA Feet 52 OZLU 0 LLI LU O U 0 U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" LeopartlN op Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant A Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ If ry a 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow C; Employment Aug 2023 Future Force Main si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA Proj:48 AA o Feet 53 q LU 0 UA Ck. LZU PAO V 0 U E V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" N A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Future Force Main Employment A.92023 si RW Existing FM ResidentialAA 0 1,000 AA o Feet q LU 0 UA Ck.tz LZU 10.= in o X K—St KOS11 St U) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes U) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ------- H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ - . ...... New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main EmploymentROy Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet D se-Ear z 8 E"t Arca ia C In LU OW LU acs CD VC) L41 G P 8 -Al J, IV— M.,kel& Grocery Copus Chri,fi Wh.—le Mar[ X > U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" iiii Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A,,1011 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA ao Feet LLLM, 2 LU iii O U 0 U > U V) Legend u,,ie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main EmploymentRW Existing FM Residential AA 1,oo o AA o Feet 57 in Proj, 'A S, LU o G Cc 0 0 U > U cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term V) Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" SUBWAY A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Future Force Main E mployment si RW Existing FM ResidentialAA Jail—IV!— 0 1,000 Market& Grocery AA Feet 58 to CWLU 0 LLI LU LU A 10 ILI' lio U u) 0 U X > V) Ij Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station X27"-36' A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ A.92023 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA Feet E 59 QW 0 UA LU Ck.tz LZU O 60 Fall Paredes ...des c.,P.s Legend Christi Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" Waste Water Treatment Plant A Improvements Recommended Z6 FutureGravity Main AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flowA.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment Buffer K!" Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 60 g j 3W o0 CL t9 4Z s W =� N N O N H N � U L y 7 Q 0 o; + ¢ N U 3 L 3 � Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term ——12" N R m —Ultimate —I5"-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o Future Farce Main Employment gue 2023/ si RW >a Existin FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet E 61 za OZLUW o 42 g a N N O a r N y U L y 7 Q 0 N r U 3 L 3 � Upie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes //Highway Ni N Near Term ——12 m Ultimate —15"-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water TreatmPlant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ „ o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o A9002,0203 Future Farce Main Employment >a Ein FM Residential „ AA 0 000 ® AA o Feet 62 a Z s� QW ¢ 0 U o Z LU v;v o w �` � >4 ter' ��✓ =. r�,v °� �. ,, � <v ti.✓ / r / JCT, / .,,,.✓ �7,,,r. i N ,..moi^�•,. �I�J �^'� ��.. ` i `•v� f/� v � J n� S Legend Ups ze Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" �1 Ultimate IS-24" /,,,�.�/`• /� �/ -'�,� " Lift Station 27 -36" No Improvements Recommended —>36" w. "" ✓ A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant �r~`M 5 Future Gravity �aFuturery ® re Grav Main nlcuz "^� � �'Q^JI 0000ao • New Lift Station a Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow '`/� iJ/// C�;� " o Hug 2023 a Future Farce Main Employment m3 `x a Existing FM restmont vT Residential „ AA 0 1,000 m i. rx HH ao Feet 63 o LU UA LU CL tz LU O fn Legend nt P- Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main EmploymentRW Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA ao Feet 64 pal. 6o LU �28fJ UA CL(z o LZRipU T M, G ....... .... ... V. 70 6, OL 161, k T —,S,pply co stj,h,Paul 11 70 U Kostory, > Legend U'lile Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near e Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA1,000 2) AA o jt Feet 65 I—_--—---—---—---—---—---—---—---—---—---—---—--- Proj. O 67 LLLM, LU 8 U w K Ha l Sr 0 U .2 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Employment Future Force Mainm3 of 0000.0 si RW Residential I Existing FM AA 1,000mm' ao Ll.p—St Feet 6 " �m m m n O a N f i i G QW ¢ OZ o :LL, - N U I � aifm- OL Proj.67 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ t L U L 7 Q U E o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA o Feet E 67 za Academy D, Lu LU :LL, G S"Saba Or 2 0- = U) Ln U 0 U fn a t3 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flowA.g 2023 zas Future Force Main EmploymentRW aQ Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet 68 H—z—D, LU OZ LU LU 8 2 o' 13- 17) Legend UpsiZe Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term 12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvement Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • 0000.0 I* New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 —Future Force Main Employment si — A A —Existing FM Residential D 1'000 V Proj.67 AA o Feet 69 Pr0j. F LU OW Pr LU 0j. Cc U 0 U E V) V) cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1— Future Force main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA Lady Feet A—en,D, corpus C h-,i,,i ...LO a m n �m mm QW OZ o LU � a o� ow �pa.a a 48n o I EL 0 U N q4t a - cc ccU U L � `epPa�dSt = 0 deo � 0 pard Sr � � 6 � 7n N U E....tive In, 7n fn 3 L 3 Legend Ups ze Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" N / bsc m �Ult mate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry a 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® qq o Feet 71 za a Uf H a n•= m SSC WLU o a2� :LL, - N U N O c N M N H U d L y O 7 Q U y k, L 3 9 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o A.g 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW . ..yG.. .... ovwwx AA `3 >a Existing FM Residential -.. 0 1,000 E AA Feet �a E 72 LUL, LU G H 8 CL U) U Prof. 73 Dia. ---—--- 0 U E V) V) cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" Skyline Dr V) Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA o Feet 73 OZLU 0 LLI :LL, a . Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • 0000.0 I* New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 —Future Force Main Employment si RW —Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet Cat* LU 0 UA LU Ck.tz LZU > U Cn Legend U,,ie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate 15"-24" Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ Pe, ce-L., a 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Re"ient a 1,000 AA AA o Feet 75 W GZ o �tz W A nY 4 l POJ 76 y n yi t •a L N 1�1rRri rlo� � L 0 ♦ � 0 f 17) U 3 � L G S Legend a ♦ W Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term Ultimate IS"-24" -L2't �l Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant - IIy1I1� g c Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ = - ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow gue 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment s RW >a Existing FM FResidential A qq 0 1,000 6 ® qq ao Feet q LU 0 UA LU Ck.tz 0 LU Legend U,,ie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA AA Feet 77 RW QUA tu CL s 4Z LU ow "Z Restaurant 2 0- = U) LO U 0 U E V) Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate -I.. Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Futurei Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lft Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow pug 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA AA Feet 78 7 J / c,!) !"� /n./ ,y� wn� Walgreens o a v _/ W N�ol G 2 0 J J `y5 s 7®9 W Zu J& �� o D,—,Cyd, w. ¢yam e' � ;.✓` � �� ,� ��rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr� _ ��✓ (7 !) 3 V f�_ •O L ✓"�:,, d ✓ Q: � N U ,, Fruic King Q io O ark Q U j One S[Or � O .../ �:./ > U V) L 1 t Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" r~' N s Ultimate IS"-24" c /tee f m Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q o a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment c o si 00 r3 >Q Existing FM Residential A qq a Melrose Christi 2�� JJJ 0 1,000 qq ao F t King E 79 a n �m m m_ g RW e GZ o� o e CL(z we 4Z " m 7 s* M'0 N a M + prof +3 N y + O M N r a M C U S Legend M + Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Ilk +�+ Near Term —12" N Ultimate �. Lift Station 27'-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" M; N E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant + IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 'Ikryy. a 000040 M New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow + gue 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment [C si RW >a Existing FM Residential A qq 0 1,000 r. ® qq o M Feet �a � E 80 q LU 0 LLI :LZLI > U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main EmploymentRW Existing FM Residential AA 0 000 V AA o Feet 81 q LU 0 UA CL tz LZU O ci N E 16 CL -I All V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA —jp.rd s 0 1,000 AA Feet 82 0, QW LIL., LU LU Nait—St Neptune Sc 5 Neptune Sco t 8 A) 2 (L = Proj.83 U) Din.= In U 0 U E V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet 13__ 10/ F QW o 0 UA Ck.tz LU oW 8 B...Ln Bear O 4fl Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 84 LPyroi.83 dJ Dia.= n LU UA LU 42ft CL tz P P I roj.8 6 W loin 8 Proj.85 Din.=12in Dia.=join CA— "t Campus .ten a U) X Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvement Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA > 0; AA Feet 85 QW OZ LU O Proj.86 Dia.=10in U N 0 U E 16 S Legend co Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" CIL V) Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA AA o Feet 86 saa LU UA Ck.tz LU 35! HOm=port Sign Lighting V, of j N > U V) /Legend /Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term ——12 / /" //j ago. / �j m I Ultimate —15"-24" 11-ift Station —27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force main Employment si RW ExistExistin FM Residential )00 AA AA Feet 87 q LU 0 UA CL. LU 8 00 > U Legend Upsie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Proj.14 Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000-0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA AA o Feet q LU 0 UA ti CL tz 4, LU 41e t 0l B9 t U 0 U > Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term NV Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA o Feet 89 Z s� 0 W Npol J W Z o Ck. ae � (99W l ap Or N / O U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term <=12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g FUWre Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .ogug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 qq Feet 90 �a LWU o Ck.tz Wch—, o .91 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended ■ Waste Water Treatment Plant 91? Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment si RW 0 1,000 AA Existing FM Residential AA Cb Feet 91 QW 0Z CL tz A 4ZW 8 .15ft Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes i7 Near Term —12" Ultimate -I.. Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA Feet sxEEr 92 LWU Ck.tz LZU 91? 46 > U V) Legend U,,ie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 46, V) Ne Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main E mployment si RW Existing FM ResidentialAA 0 1,00 0 AA o Feet 93 SIr—er sr LU UZA 0/ Uj CL(z LU ow t fs O ,,Bay D- 0 U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —121, Ultimate 1'24" Lift Station 27'-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AU2 2— Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet U4 CL.Iz G DAG' .24ft fn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate 1'24" Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Employment A1,2021 —Future Force MainRoy —Existing FM Residential1,000 AA AA Feel ZJ Country Club Z a Estates %i r W / CW o Prof, a, e U N O N H c � t U Q U O �a ) _A N U V) 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" /� N Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J x A Improvements Was Improvements Recommended — t E A Lnprovements Recommended � Waste Water Treatment Plant ~" Zg Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ / a o000a0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ""�,, / .o Aug 2011 z Future Force Main Employment �`�.., si RW x >a Existing FM Residential / AA 0 1,000 AA Feet 96 LU UA LU Ck.tz LZU i G 24Jf Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000,0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 V AA o Feet 97 osQ WZ CL tz LZU 8 2 U) Ln Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow qua 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 98 VV*96 LU qeo 4Z LU O 4Pz Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 99 - \ yy a� W 4Z LU G O Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flowAll 1011 Future Force Main EmploymentRW Existing FM Residential AA Ph.r—y 0 1,000 AA Feet 00 W LLI aW � saUroTocwe O o a a� � U R L 0 _ w 0 01 U 6 Q` 0 corPUs a � U 3 a L S Legend - Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o A.g 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment si RW r >a Existing FM Residential A AA 1,000`. / E AA �o o Feet 101 a° LU LULLI LU LLI O a . Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" V) Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 — New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet __102 a Z s W \ WZ o� n \ aW Brasl se ine / G H d z Fu h ng % G ,fl/ Guitar Center � � ad op• O N R U L y 7 7 Q U N o CVS/pharmacy }' N U Everhart/Staples tl L 3 � j a j S Legend � Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" Ultimate IS"-24" —Pe,6alatl Lift Station 27"-36' e A No Improvements Recommended —>36" � N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZa 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow o Aug 2023 Future Farce Main Employment Walgrens s P RW r a Existing FM Residential A AA 0 000 1I ® AA ao L \ Feet a° 103 A�c !dYlwoo�' �aI ii W OW o CLZ o J 3 4W FJ Fj\- sqa �......J h � a St A;ameca St 5 tnft LJ y in N � U l /tt ++ r � �c Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term <=12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" M N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant + Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J .ogue 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment si 00 x >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 0 1,000 V0 _ ® AA ao + Feet #4 — 104 a- � W Pa o CL tz wa=de t9 M,—,i.1 Park LZU i G 269 20# U) E Legend sUipsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" >36" 10, A No Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant A Improvements Recommended Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ H 7. 0000.0 N i ew Lft Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AuO 2— Future Force Main Employment s RW Existing FM Residential 1, 0 1,000 AA V AA Feet --LO-5— RW 0 UAa CL(9 y W a (7 a� 'o APol N H 10@ U � y r S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" �\ m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" �\ E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ��APo g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ '�• a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 10 .o A.92023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA o Feet E 106 za `111"Itt,Pak 760- q LU 0 UA CL(z LZU o "PO O'> cc cc cc Legend Upsile Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 'Jes,Term —12" tiiiiiiig Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant rya s� FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential )o AA AA Feet 'W 107 QW CL(z LU O Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flowA.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment — A Existing FM Residential A 2,ft 1,000 AA Feet 108 a � 8 JJIJJIJJIJJIJJI� / LU 0 ZLU CL o 0 LU 4 Z N O a� y `\ 7 Q U '\ fn S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" �\ m �Ultimate Lift Station 27"2T'-36" `J x A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ " �,O b�0 a 0000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 1 .o Aug 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet a° 109 LU 0 LLI L�z 'tie a LU 0 U) 77o a) 'a U 0 U > S Legend Existing Gravity Pipes Upsize Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 16ft -A.g2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,13 3 AA Feet 0LU LLI LLI LU Tro.1-1 1— o SP � / Q Pella y Legend Ol Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 110 Near Term —12" Ultimate k, Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvement Recommended >36" 4fl A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant it, Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.92023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM1,000 Residential AA AA MG Rui din, Feet E 111 13 ft Corpus Chr W, g LU QUA CL tz LU Oq ,ti L y k - , °r N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ^ +�+ Near Term <=12" Ultimate �O �J Lift Station 27"-36" Q `" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g FULUfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ Mgr,y a 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow pad IRI^III *ogue 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® qq ao ° Feet E 112 za QW OW LU :LL, a . ..................... Ila X Cn S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" 1V N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 13 W Red wi^g LI CL -� _.� r ,�-.:� ✓ k� `"'`��Ci, Z r snow stage _ q ,� ��/ ., ,._ .� �?�. s o W o= Metro by .,VAe st tlke ,� S Men. y '^ a h o� _ 4ieNa 2D h` V�r^e'Dr V cuiper Park •O U) � U L y Q 6 Oft rci c Qj0 e U y� L CID 2 %Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" 5 N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant p g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ p Q a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow�� ''^J .o AU22023 >a Future Force Main Employment Q¢o si RW >a Existing FM Residential 0 1'o0o AA n 6 AA Feet E 114 LU OZ :LL, H O S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA o Feet 115 LU 0 UA CL tz LU O a f3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate 0 Qi Lift Station 27"-36" QF A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA o Feet 116 GLU 0 UA "e, CL(z LZU /Al C� Ilyae Pig P,,k 'Ropas Park .O M Rei'I ` .y., y N Is, NOW- TPWD e Rp—f,gi, .20ft LegendpT Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate —15"-24" Lift Station —27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant p. Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Aug 2023 —Future Force main Employmentda 0000.0 —Existing FM Res ident ia I AA 0 1,000 T!SiRT&@1-11. AA k Feet 117 8 Lamar P�,k'� y OW o c 2 5ouch Pope �? W Park .. G LZU tIr � a o e " k �Nt�� "o lTrn': zt ew \�` R N i Seaside V Memorial Park \S.1herl-ds Cannel Pnrk0L6ro0kdale Park H_E_g Ealba ngersNstage9f1 amu S FLeg d Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" Ultimate —15"-24" Lift Station —27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant D� sq�a Iy^II Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ J r Q a 0 000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW 3 Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA 9 �n'llhar Rd ® AA �Slphar 5 n[Pa d_ y E �o Eve h t/Stapl " _,ammo Feet E 118 a° - Windsor Park LU OZ LU O U 0 U 7tl (Q Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA O AA 119 Feet sq LU ��` ✓ / �7 I Ji r� G W o 7 �J2 Wtz Ck. o O L tz LZU L Acus PaM1 Legend N Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes o*; +�+ Near Term —12" Q A R Ultimateprof !a�\O. Lift Station 27"-36" 120 A No Improvements Recommended —>36" �.p A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� \\ g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .og 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment si RW x >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 AA aoFeet120 #4 y<n QW CL(z LZU Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A112021 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Resdental AA 1'000 AA F�' izu ea V ee Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 z ea ' Future Force Main Employment 11196 4 , Existing FM Residential 1,000AA % AA ao / Feet 122 A m [ushnetPark °y "n _ CVS/Rha,—, Q W ` 1 ,9 C 2 0 °4a°O �M Family Dollar Q w c � ^ V aW o= g O GOODYEAR ^ o w 4k, �z z aqueri S o Li o 247! m �D o o` C °frge e s a z4n a e U dO s es O� °ear c° Ma 9a� :4R o L N SPc�� Huntington � Park Q 0 E 0 N U S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term <=12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" N phe �J A No Improvements Recommended ->36" C A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant shay g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow �• ''^J , p Aug 2023 >a Future Farce Main Employment >a Existing FM Residential Q A AA a 0 1,000 t E AA ao F t 123 E a 5 8 m a a_ Will � C W �c Gvslanarma,v = a2 W y q W Famiry Douar U O N H Golden crown U Chinese L N Restaurant 'o Q' U �6 N O U) _A ,,N U GOODYEAR Domino's V/ L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" / Taqueria A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant <,,Mercico Lind. Iy^II ZgFuture Gravity Main ® oAICUZ Q a 000-o •� New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow . gue 2011 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW �Ax >a Existing FM Residentialdv� „ qq 0 000 "6 oFFRtl ® E qq o Feet E 124 q LU 0 LLI LU :LL, O >Cn U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA Feet —V 125 Cat* 20* -E LU 0 UA Ck.tz LZU Cn 0) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA 41� Feet 126 r8 e Ul"cF Statior�#5 KFc H,,p,t,l C",�" Ch,,,ti S,0 or 0�'Rl[I ly�Au— LU 61 UA CL(z zLZU —h— If Crossgate Park o IT > U 219 Cn 10/ Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant B.&N—PO. NN Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ Park 000040— New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW 03 Existing FM Residential .19R 10 1,000 AA AA Feet 27 ri Q W wLU_ s / CL:LL, � H / L y 3 \ S Legend \� Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A >36" \ �J No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZo Q a .000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow . A.g 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment {M^'000si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 , ® AA ao d c,.a Feet E 128 a4 �'3ut F ; o Ca QW OW o CL W oW 7 y ,.. % % 7 e v O / ~ N d / \�\X.9 H O 3 L S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1�� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry a gue 2023 0000,0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow zFuture Farce Main Employment >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000v ® qq o F Feet 129 a° � e /// / '� y y �e LL, :LZLI Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main mployment si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA V AA Feet ---L-0 g % GW W. Ck. tz ' I 4 W o F (7 L � U / N O 111 y c � S Legend �� a iUpsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW r >a Existing FM Residential 1,000 A AA ,, ® AA o M Feet E 131 za QW ¢ 0 U o �tz LU 4Z o� a � � � 7 �.^ /�✓�'��/ _...� -� J 'Oro d ._ I 14 N 3 � o / L Oo � 9 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA o Feet E 132 o° 25 ft a,0 0O _/ LL QW IN 0 2 0 / t� 0 r° aahama. 4 W a Kingston Park ,l Aro N f �, !_7�',> ✓ io 133 ++ r ra N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" �or CU N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant zj�. Iy^II` Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ^J .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 �o Feet 133 az U1, ¢ A"ol. O W o Z -- '� aC9 �a 1, aW s J ' o w i i � a U cc U a -1 U N O NV) U 3 L 3 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate 1 '-24" �l Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Qa a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o All 2023 Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ 1,000 AA M ® AA ao Feet 134 ka a Pf'y Dl Z 8 A q LU P0l CW o LY Z i a' (7 / a U S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq a 0 000 AA o Feet E 135 za QW OZ LU U 0 U >Cn U 0; Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 AA 0 1,00 AA o Feet --L-6 a 3j 8� JLU O2 0 sR W o a� W a Or ) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" +N A No Improvements Recommended —>36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ a o000a0 New Lift Statim o Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow oi NS7N *o Aug 2023 z >a Future Force Main Employment ,�� d3e Fa �P'h"r si 00 >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet 137 QW OZ LU Pao N U U Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • 0000.0 I* New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 —Future Force Main Employment si RW —Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA Feet 138 No, a QW C2LU 0 W N H Quo v � U / U aLegend %' l upsie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term < 12 ./� Mme' �' „''' `• � Ultimate Lift Station 27 -36" No Improvements Recommended —>36" ti s ♦ Improvements Recommended ■ waste water Treatment Plant gFuture Gravity Main ®AI6UZ ✓ �; / / ro„ a 000-0`2 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow / ; �' �w,, ��' ✓^„ '°+..✓ o Aug 2023 Future Force Main Employment o �" +,,, ; „"m, 4�/ \ �� "„✓ ~ °"^M,,,� ~� s ROy x >a Existing FM Res dent al ~ti'`.1/ i „"" ~"~`.,,"'`✓' l A ✓ !~ 0 1,000 AA AA ao r �/� �,`,,ti, �� „•„�.,,,. /' �,� ✓ Feet 139 jW < WZ s aW i Cc U i h / A m\ lf`o Ato �t 0 o C O U e, cc S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" �� -- R m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" / �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" /(J N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ I ry a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII "~` .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 AA o Feet # VD E 140 LU 0 UA CL tzo B,Ikn,—PIII st LU ell 8 d,lly L, ti Ij aZca o q�", E X,/ U > U A'0J. Legend 'Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A,O A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment si RW 1,000 Existing FM Residential N AA AA Feet 41 VA/ WLUZ s �ane,.r CL(z s a 2`0 AP®l ° e 4 W o io ip Q� 6 Q w p�Oy r O BrockhamP[on '` I� AP@'I•''' s (� U Park ��pr Brighton Pa rk _ ese r 2�n I' _ O a A'i rlln �'✓' L N wry p � 3 � L 3 �o Legend 6h 3 Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" r O N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ok4�a d g FUWre Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Olt o ^J Hug 2023 >a Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential a - A HH 0 1'000 E HH Feet 142 s Ion Tenex W QW OZ LU O U 0 U > Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • 0000.0 I* New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 —Future Force Main Employment si RW —Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 143 ( � 8 QW GW o WCL Z /( 4 W a `l ( �'(' ',✓ <'„� / / � X01. � d 3 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" i m �Ultimate Lift Station 27"27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant / g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ v a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow w .o pug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment 3 >a Existing FM Residential 4tp 0 1,000 AA V� ® AA a o Feet E 144 za qLu QUA CL(z LZU O ayi Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZA.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 0000,0 Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA o Feet __145 QW 0U o CLtz 4Z g � a i i N � L ' a Q \ Cn 3 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" �Ultimate Lift Station 27"27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ a 0 000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow n I .o pug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment Spat si RW >a Existing FM Residential 000 „ qq vfd0. 0 1, ® AA o Feet E 146 za ' QW G o� 4W N +, 7 ,v v ashy i w a N U \ fn 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A >36" �J No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZa 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow qug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment Mb, si RW x >a Existing FM Residential 'a „ AA 0 000 ® AA ao Feet . �a 147 o Lim, o :LL, - � o� APof 1q sit L ° N H N � U ss" L N oN o Q O E U N U � Wo- L y' a) a 9 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" a � Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" v N E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1�` g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow gue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment s RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet E 148 a Z s a a �m y 3� g en Q W ¢ 48Rz e OZ o� e Q2 4 Ly ow a �w N U N O N H N U L y Q U of N N U F as R 3 L 3 � Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term m Ultimate —1 '-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� 4 g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow gue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Ein FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet E 149 za QW OZ 42 Prof.P roj; G 149 �ash 2 0- = U) U D 0 U PM&too E 0 KIIIII City—t—I K-Mclty,LOumtM U) KansasCity Southern > V) Ag—St Agnes st Legend Ups 2e Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes U) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Ate 2023 Future Force Main Employment o�io.Ea RW Existing FMAA Residential 1,000 AA o Feet 150 Piroj.182 0 en r LLI CL LU 451t 8 1�45ft 45,t 0 U .,5ff Eo V) N > V) CL cc /Legend /Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 45A Near Term V) T 'iiiiiiig Ultimate /Lift Station 27"-36" A � A No Improvements Recommended >36" 45 A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 2021 Future Force Main Employment si RW ExistExistin FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA Feet 151 W ¢ O 2 a• o 459 a� a2 W - N V N O U � L N a � a U � N U Alpine St 3 /Legend a Sp—Neaa Te Tty erm Existing lr2avity Pipes a R m iiiiiiig Ultimate —15"-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" �J No Improvements Recommended —>36" N £3 A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FFuture Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si 00 >a Ein FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet 44 152 Corpus Ch'i'd Med Ct,N Reg'l LU G Pro).4 LL J ze Exigtin r. 78 g P 3 O U) U 0 U � E V) > Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" I-d-52------- N A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity MaZ6in AICUZ 21 Highway 77 a . ...... New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow CD A.9 2023 E ------ si RW Future Force Main mployment fO Existing FM Residential �O 1,000 AA V o_ AA o ® Feet 153 Pr�' X69 p LU 2 0 Ck.tz o 4Z g � a N 7 V N O a _ � N H - t � o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" N �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" 000040 A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ a w New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Hug 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment ri RW >a Existing FM Residential „ aaR 0 1,000 HH ® HH o Feet E 154 za q LU 0 UA CL tz LZU Proj. 155 Ur O Cc U 0 U E V) Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Prof V) Near Term —12" Ultimate 168 Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant H Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZA.9 2023 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Future Force Main EmploymentRW Existing FM Residential O AA 1,000 AA o Feet 155 Z s� QW ¢ 0 U o Ck.tz 4Z e s e a W <� o= a� P r s N N O a � U Q Q�0 = U � O N U 3 L 3 � Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term <=12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 AA o Feet E 156 za QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU Mo. sof E �vR Ur 8 A) 2 Cn Legend Upsie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA Proj.161 Feet ___157 0 Pr0j.169 QW OZ LLI :LL, 8 O Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet 158 '&N PRoj.763 Proj._1.69 CL SSC LU OZ LL, 8 �64ft 1 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main EmploymentRW 'Oh Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA Feet 159 QW ¢ GZ o CL� 4Z g � a N U N O N N N •o a` � w a` Q- U � o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0000.0 • New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J o All 2011 orwe� <� >a Future Farce Main Employment NCrtohssin, >a Existing FM Residential „ AA n -Proj.169 0 1,000 Proj_163 - ----- - --------- ® E AA #o p Feet E 160 CL` Proj.161 .L a y cesAcres W } I) G � o Uj CLLU �a 4Z g � a N U N O m N y N � � U 'o R a � w a U � o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term Ultimate IS"-24" F6t �l Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g FUWfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment si RW 3 >a Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA V� .6 ® AA o Feet E 161 za QW ¢ CZ o :LL, - N U N O N N H oy o a R U CL w a U N o NV) U V) 3 L cc 3 c Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 000040 • New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 z >a Future Force Main Employment si RW x >a ExistingFM Residential „ R csR Proi.163 Proj.169 o t,000 ^^ AA OcpFeet E a 162 a° ` QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU N t O 8 2 Proj.163 Proj- U) 169 U 0 U E V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA o Feet 163 lot C s QW OZLU o a2 W - � <sR o� N (7 U N O ayi U L y Q U � o N U Cn 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a •� New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J .o A..2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment o000a0 si 00 >a Ein FM Residential 4qR „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet a 164 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Rt xxxrr� ,x��. Lake`s Z 8 Northwest vanes view pr yy g wsarne,cn Q W ¢ LU 0 Z o o a2 q 7 a N h � O N H N � U L y Q U X o NV) U p ,/9 3 L Memorial Park ++ 9 Cemetery S ]6j( Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" nn N �w+ m Ultimate 1 BPad as Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0000.0 •I* New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow a9 gue 2023 z —Future Force Main Employment a ft si RW x —Existing FM Residential „ qq Rz� 0 1,000 � ISR ® e qq ao 81R Feet k4 165 "°'WighwaY 77 Q g z W R e m � \V9� F9 N U N ^ ,O N H N R L y UA LU Q sd U co�nvy Road 4 3 L 3 i°UniJ Roatl 43 9 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes County R ++ Near Term —12" Ultimate IS"-24" �l Lift Station 27"-36" / `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" / N Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ / a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ISJf / MeatlOW Lt Aug 2023 Future Farce Main Employment 4 si Rw x a Existing FM Residential c r „ qq 0 1,000 6 ' ® AA Yo Feet 166 a7 ,6a qLU 0 U :list#!flUst ttiU ?t r JII({!!s at Fs3 u U F n t )3 {} nr CL tz �4��fS ;�:t�,< Q Z 4W 69 � 1 'sRn oaor G .. J ft 6Jf IL V County Road 48 County Roatl 48 .O se _ a Qa County Road 4g M L �, f � V 7v L N 7 � = U '3n 16N U Z3ft fn 3 L � � Meatln'H Ln S Legend o Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term —12" Mueller R Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" x\ N 00" 3 R E A Improvements Recommended � Waste Water Treatment Plant � g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ c e 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o pug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA CoFeet 167 3¢ unty Roatl qo e sa q LU 0 UA CL(z LZU O 'Or0j, 16 U) LO a U 0 U E V) Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow nue 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA Feet 168 QW OZ LU 0 CL 8 O Proj.169 PITA U u) 163 0 U V) V) Legend T Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes CL V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow �60g A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet 169 g RW G2 0 �tz LU 4Z II 0 'c N a � a8n a U v a� O a r 171 L 7 Q y U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term R m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 * New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow gue 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet 170 za tau, CL PaPaj.h , -NOBBY LOBBYj' SUBWAY80ft " '9]' LU 75ft G wi-e—hri—1 Northwest Brod Prof, 171 AT&T Hearn o, D—Y, Murphy USA LZ 0 U W.1-t XMa o fn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate -I.. Lift Station 27"-36" A A No Improvements Recommended >36" -A, A Improvement Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ergo Iy^II 8 Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ . o 0 0 0 .0 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA V Proi 171 Feel jLAllisonWWTP 2 8' \\ 0 2C ft LU 5 ft 0 UA Uj CL y tTca7e C°.ritl \\ Q o� WZ iota r \ V $0, { N L .41 . Q _ � O � O N U 3 _ L �3>q rrp 3j Arce,. v � �, ss ROsN Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +tea Near Term —12" Ultimate R �J Lift Station 27"-36" No Improvements Recommended —>36" N Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A1,1011 zFuture Farce Main Employment N si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA a o Feet 172 za Cat* LU 0 UA CL tz LU H Proj.179 2 CL .- U) U U) 0 U > V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AuO 2023 Future Force main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential , 0 AA 10 proj.222 0 0 AA Feet 173 a .o Proj.222 Z a a n sm mm m y W 0U o CL� 4Z U N O L a •- n N H N CL L N a e U O N U a 35h S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term ——12" m —Ultimate —15"-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" �J No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0 000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow, Aug 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment m3 of o..a >a Ein FM Residential ---- p 1,000 oaAw. qq a �g ® wEcrcEo AA o Feet E 174 za 0 v 0 Nq LU CL Proj.175 0 UA Ck.tz LZU 8 f 0 U E V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment si RW ExistExistin FM Residential 1,000 AA AA o Feet 175 QW ¢ OZ o :LL, - H O � N A � V 0 L y Q U � o � r a � N U S LegeUpie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ti y Near Term J[ m Ultimate —15"-24" �O• �l Lift Station —27"-36" `J x A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZa 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow, ' .o A.92023 Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Ein FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® AA o Feet 176 za a �m � ao m m� oz a QW OZ o 42 W =� ow N 7 e ash N I ,O I a •— � N H � t a � w a / o E U a � O � r N U 3 L f+ Legend "R Ups ze Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term < 12 N R m �Ultimate —I5"-24" Lift Station —27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N aA Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZa 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o All 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment si RW >a Existing FMResidential „ qq 0 1,000 �o Feet E 177 za nitt W LU 02 acs o� Lzu G 45ft O 5jt X > U V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" V) Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvement Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ a 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 45ft Au92023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential Ea AA 1,000- Rose Acre AA .... Feet 178 �40,v LU UA CL(z 401, LZU G 40ft 8 O Proj.179 'vft > U V) 5,t Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Ot Near Term —12" V) Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 40,t apR 0000-0— New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow pug 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA ao Feet 179 ria I—j QW 0 UA Ck.tz LZU 8 O CL > U V) cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 V Proj.175 AA o Feet 18 4'1 —T 1D a Proj. Proj.182 m yy o� 151 Q W OZIm o 42 s W =� N a N G o O CL I N qsa •� x V w •O o N y a y •— R U Q � � U a,h 4h O j N a) A U V) 3 L l f+ 9 S Legend � Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term —12" na¢ N Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant gFuture Gravity Main ®AICUZa 000040 ♦ New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o A.92023 z >a Future Force Main Employment >a Ein FM Residential „00 qq 0 1,0 ® qq o Feet 181 za RW 0 UA LU asn G CL. N t 46ft G. Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A00g002,0203 Future Force Main Employment 45ft si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet S,d,, Rd 182 srP i Z a n I O as s I �� RW CZ 4W 3 � o is Ry m k n ® 45R �eppardSc .7 V m I II .. •0 — 53 ft a y its ayi i h cepa d � v Q O U N o _a F N U a V) 3 L d Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term m Ultimate �. Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" .,N, a A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant 3 Future Gravity Man ®AICUZ Q a 000040 M New Lft Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 45h QSR ^J , Aug 2023 < a Future Farce Main Employment si RW ox E 3 >Q Existing FM Residential _ 0 T 1,000 o�w. AA �^ N — wEcrcEo AA CIL Feet a 183 g W San Q 0ZLU o L4, W - N e � s /o, y %A •O N 'y N 8p L y O � Q U � o r � U I 177 a R Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term —12" m Ultimate —15"-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZa 000040 M New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o A.92023 za Future Farce Main Employment >a Existing FM Residential A qq 0 1,000 ao Feet E 184 za q LU 0 UA CL tz LZU okra 8 lb N N o U 0 U E Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow1'1'u^JIIA.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA ao Feet 185 q LU 0 UA Ck.tz LU O 1,9,9 0 E V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 186 W N a 40 LU OZ LU LLI 8 wee o� Legend upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main EmploymentRW Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA Feet 187 QW ¢ 0 U o Ck.tz LU 4Z o� N Niol -a X89 (7 V N O � N H Quo � U L y zch � Q � N U Cn 3 L Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZry e 000040 • New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment / si RW a >a Existing FM a S Residential A AA 0 000 V6 ® AA o Feet E 188 za ° 4 QW 5ft O Z o e a,. se 0 W <_ c v � 7 V 0 � N H o 4 U sr � i H Q U sea, ma E p N U R„fi f Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term <=12” Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 0000.0 M New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow �i 11'^JII .ogue 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment x >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 oa w. ref ® gg Feet p E 189 a° h LU 'Ila LU Ck.tz W ON O APOl 190 U) Ln U 0 U E Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 190 25fir QW �23fl CL LU G .24it .2517 U) 239 0 U E Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term -12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" Waste Water Treatment Plant A Improvements Recommended .23ft Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA AA o 191 24ft —Feet q Lu LIM. LU 410 'Ib 5 z LLI London Lift 8 25ff E FN q3 London Rd FM 43 �4/t 43 Weber Rtl y Hyde Park D, Legend I Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 2 Near Term 4it V) Ultimate 1'24" Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential A AA 0 1,000 AA Feet 192 L4 LLI LU .22fl , 26ft aL4 G lb 0 O 229 London Lift station 20ft E 16 �7- V) > 3S)t V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 32ft Aug 1011 Future Force main Employment l Existinq FM Residentia AA 0 1,000 AA Feet 193 pla. QW 0 UA ;6R Ck.tz W 5 S, Fz--] 5 st'o"St npi,St G 20 ft 8 ff 25 ft •25ft U E > U Cn 20it Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Mjt Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si RW Existing FM ResidentialAA " 0 1,000 o AA V PM&I Feet 194 24ft LU 0 UA LU Ck.tz LU N CL o Creek Dr pr V pm.in = to cc U 0 U E o 06 U) > U V 0 Legend N Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes 2 V) cc Near Term —12" CL Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0— New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA o Feet 195 ✓j� /� -.. H -- 28ft 27,It q LU OZ LU 29ft LU t .26ft 26P, IL..d..East 26ft 27ft 3 .25ft 12 5 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes County Rd 20A CII my Rd ion Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" N A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ,8 Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ CL 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA Prj. AA ao 24 ft Feet 196 a - Webers Glen 3 m a =� e e o W L I�w o W G 28it 0 y in R U I L y IJ Q N U Cn 3 L 3 Legend _ Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes kondon East Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27'-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N aP EA Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant �ypq g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ "46,pi a 000040 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow (p .ogue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW x >a Existing FM Residential A qq �x O 5J( 0 1,000 6 ® AA o Feet 197 za LU OW LZLI G lot 22ft 'Ib O R 0 U t U Cn Legend Upsie Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ;Ifl Near V) Term —12" London Lift Ultimate 6tation Lift Stat on 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Aug 2023 Future Force main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 100 o Feet 198 pr*21" QW CZ LU G O .33h -a .32ft CL CF, a 0 U E a) V) V) cc S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant 32 Jt Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 AA county Rd 22 Feet 199 O LU UA CL(z LZU ow G 31,t 8 0 O —bel Rd -bel Rd —bd,Rd �Oft Eo Hyde Park 01 V) > V) .32ft Legend –. 0it Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes .31 ft V) Near Term Ultimate —15"-24" Lift Station —27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 28G a 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 —Future Force Main Employment si RW —Existing FM Residential AA0 1,000 Proj-201 AA Feet 200 QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU 3k V 13# 2 Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet QW OZ :LL, 110 CF, 0 U E U) > U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant '15fl Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA o AA V Pf* Feet _2 _LO pr4 log QW OZ C,—ty RA 20A C111ty R.]20A LU G 8 2 o U) Jc'jCI.Pd c--P, 'a O CL Zo 0 U E V) cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" z N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant 16R IIy1I1� Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 Proj.195 AA o Feet 203 KaHA 16 lay . ft —————— pr*IN q LU CZ LU Lu 5 StaplesSt 5 Staples S, G 201t kL 0 mg-1 U) .�2 !4 19j[ N I U cc 0 U E 16 X a) 15jt k .AOR Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" N A Improvement Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 169 A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment — A sit A Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 AA o Feet 204 OWLU 0 LLI 24fir LU :LL, 25 ft 25,t 24ft 25ft U) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" f ,A No Improvements Recommended >36" NI A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow h r0 Hug 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residential AA 0 1,000 AA o Feet --LO-5— 24ft 8 25ft r ul CL Proj.195 LU G 8 06 oft 2 1444O S Staples R as St 0- = U) U 0 U > U SR V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" 25ft A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential .23# AA 0 1,000 AA o Feet 206 QW ¢ 0 U o Ck.tz LU 4Z g � a N U N O ayi U L y Q U U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g FUWfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 oPe ® qq ao �� Feet E 207 za Z s� QW ¢ 0U o LU A 3 LU o q ,-......... a� (7 (r N O N H N � U L y Q U � o 3 L 3 A 9 AO. S Legend �Jo Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g FUWfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 M New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential _ „ qq 0 1,000 ® qq a o Feet E 208 za QW OZ LU O U 0 U Legend sR Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate IS 24" Lift Station X27"-36" N A No Improvements Recommended >36" ......took A Improvements Recommended M Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ000040 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet 209 QW 0 UA CL(z LZU G H Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station X27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" \\\0\%N\ A Improvements Recommended ■ Waste Water Treatment Plant X Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ Xv, 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Aug 2023 Future Force Main Employment Existing FM Residentia o 1,o AA V o AA o Feet 210 QW ¢ 0 U o CL(z +� 4 W l 1 yo, s \ . >> u a` � N H 3 U N N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate �. Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended —>36" ff N Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant f.-f f Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 'ff �8 roe xo. 0000.0 `� ♦ New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow f f�f oai[ nue 2011 >a Future Force Main f:Employment si ROy of�x[v >a Existing FM Residential f f ff-s 0 1,000 nn ff ® nn fy a° ff y�y Feet E 211 QW ¢ 0 U o Ck.tz 4Z g � a N U N O N H N � U L y Q U 3V/ � proj- 2�2 i N a R Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a o000a0 • New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow ''^J .o A.g 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment si 00 >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 AA ao ,yyg Feet 212 a° A QW OZ LU o Io U w 0 U E V) Cn Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" q, N Waste Water Treatment Plant A Improvements Recommended 14, Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment AlK si RW Existing FM Residential Proj�230 1,000AA AA zo et Zap Fe ...21_3 W o GZ o ¢` CL 4Z g � a N V N O i � U Q L y Q U � N U Cn 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq o Feet E 214 za QW ¢ 0U o Ck.tz LU 4Z g � a N U N O N H N � U L y Q U a � p 0�NO sem. r � •— 3 L 3 A +' S Legend �f 29S Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 M New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .o A.g 2023 za Future Farce Main Employment si RW 3 >a Existing FM Residential 0 1,000 nn a AA o Feet 215 proj.234 Proj 2,54 Cat* 0 LU 0 UA Ck.tz LU O 8 0 U Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 216 QW 0 U o Ck.tz LU 4Z g � a N U N O � U L � Q U � o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant I'I1Ir1 g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII o AU22023 za Future Force Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ AA 0 1,000 ® AA o Feet E 217 za a un L }}t irk H W e r t OW o LU ��90 4 W a 6 o _ �� 9 Qi V `/p R„ (t fC ipus ry O o a •- Q` to H Cc CcU U L y 7 Q ,®ppl y U r 8� � O 3 Waldron Field r yx� L a k`cw'Ri Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" 5Jt F�+ Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" / N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant �JJJ��,,, g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ,//�, a 000040 M New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o Aug 2023 za oA E a Future Force Main Employment �j o�io.Ea RW x >a Existing FM Residential �"'k � /)o A AA A 0 1,0 R ' PO4 00// z4 6 190 ® / of 218 Quo U) Arol LU LLI LU 199 W 42 O U U 63 S Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term — Ultimate —15"-24" Lift Station —27"-36" A No Improvement Recommended >36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow � Aug 2023 Future Force Main Employment >a Existin FM Residential QW 0 UA Ck.tz LU O O Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA AA o Feet 20 LU 0 UA Ck.tz Kol—City South— Kansas city Soultie" 4W ow Agnes S, Ag'.St Ag...St A9111 St T� E-1 A9111 SI 43fl 2 (L = U) Tx—aa I 0 U a f3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term o=12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow Aug 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA 1'000 AA o Feet 221 W 0 U o Ck.LU� 4Z 0 e - an z U N O Proj_222 H � t � U L y Q 0 N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" 39,t N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g FUWfB Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry e 0000.0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zFuture Force Main Employment >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 6 ® qq a o Feet E 222 za QW ¢ OZ o 42 LI g � a N U N O N H N � U L y Q U U 3 L 3 � Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term m Ultimate —15"-24" �l Lift Station —27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o qug 2023 Future Farce Main Employment >a Ein FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 o Feet E 223 za LU 0 UA 4Q CL(z LU ow8 0 2 EL U) R 0 U E X W Proj.175 'Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes � V) Near Term —12" I—Ultimate —15"-24" 1Lift Station —27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" j N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000-o New Lift Station, Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow quo 2023 Future Force main Employment / IJ 0 1,000 E t FM ResidentialAA AA o Feet 224 a am OLU W :LL, ow V) a) 'k Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flowoa cHug 2023 Future Force Main Employment m3 a Existing FM Residential Pro].226 l'000 AA AA ------ Co7q6,7�B5�y— Feet �7jt 225 LU CL(z 14 LZU ow h. V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes -k V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" 7fl A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant [uin,Bay Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 • New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.g 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA Feet __.226 QW 0 UA 4Z LU O Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate -I.. Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ • New ft Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AIIIOII Future Force Main Employment Lift 0000.0 si Existing FM Residential AA 1,000 AA o Feet 227 0 Cat* P,61-212 q LU 0 UA Ck.tz LU P,61- 361] rn 361] Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow AU2 2023 Future Force main Employment si RW Existing FMI Residentia AA 1,oo o AA o Feet 228 NX o RW 0 UA CL(z �a 4Z a N � V o � � Q � 0 a . 229 � N y � � U L y Q U N U a I LU CID S Legend R Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ t Near Term —12" -��'� P N Ultimate IS"-24" '�- roj•230 �. Lift Station 27"-36" + A No Improvements Recommended —>36" E A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant +yam. Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 0 000a0 w New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .o A.g 2023 zss Future Force Main Employment si RW �x >Q Existing FM Residential A qq [` 0 1,000 C ® AA 4 Feet E 229 W � \ q LU LLI LLIZ :LL, \ _ � � ;: 8 0 -Ilk AF Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate P Lift Station 27"-36" r0L 231 , a -=_nts Recommended >36" . __w__ / a ______ Z6 Future Gravity Main AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A009002,0203 Employment Future Force Main Existing FM Residentia i AA 1,000 AA Feet 30 h 229 Al' Pr 230 LU OW CL(z LZU 8 410 A/ Legend PS Pr Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential 1,000 AA AA o Feet 231 LU LU Ck.tz LZOU CL U) N E U) > U V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term 12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" pros- 232 A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ 0000.0 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow—, A.9 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential AA1,000 AA o Feet 232 za I_j Proj.233 sm 45)t Q LU OZ :LZLI 8 O LO o U 0 0 V) V) Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Future Gravity Main Z6 AICUZ New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow pug 2023 Future Force Main Employment si RW Existing FM Residential A AA 0 1,00 AA Feet 233 LU UA Pro0l 234 LU Ck.tz LU CIj ix 2 to ai Cc U 0 U E V) V) cc Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes V) Near Term —12" Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" N A No Improvements Recommended >36" A Improvements RecommendedWaste Water Treatment Plant FutureGravity Main Z6 AICUZ N 000040 New Lfti Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow All 1011 Future Force main Employment in AA Existing FM Residential D 1,000 AA 3o G3 Feet 34 �sC W OZ o a2 W - N U N O N H N U L y Q U � o a N U 3 L 3 � Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes ++ Near Term —12" m iiiiiiig Ultimate 15"-24" �l �. Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N^ E A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant ,g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ 000040 New Lift Station Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow A.9 2023 Future Farce Man Employment >a Ein FM Residential „ V 0 1,000gg ® AA o Feet E 235 za a p 8^ y. q LU W = e 0 oN e � o s � CLt9 0� 4Z '¢ " W o _ J o ow � � a P �w 6h JJJ' V f , � to �4� N •y Flout a,. a � > U 3 L S Legend ] { $; 0 jUpsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes t Near Term <=12" c N > f3 .t.QRhetta Place Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J No Improvements Recommended —>36" _ N Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant r Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ r Q\ a o000a0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow .ogue 2023 z >a Future Farce Main Employment _ si ROy >a Existing FM Residential = „ 0 ¢ 1,000 AA ® AA Feet E 236 a° QW ¢ OZ o a2 W - N V N O APol N H �3Y U L y Q U � o N U 3 L 3 Legend Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes +�+ Near Term —12" APOl m Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" O `J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant IIy1I1� g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ ry a 0000.0 ♦ New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow 11'^JII .ogug 2023 zss Future Farce Main Employment si RW >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 000 ® qq o Feet 237 za 358 Z s� O Flour Bluff q LU Pzz G W o 111�� 4.r CL Z a t+ utu X/ {j F Q Z W fFJ ss 4 J Js�JJJss ?r = t q k, l`, m Viral .O ArOl2`�9 � ,w � U < f W"' r e 0 `Idr R,. V O F V U � anemor�i o�rx 4egend "R Upsize Gravity Pipes Existing Gravity Pipes Near Term <=12" N �Ultimate Lift Station 27"-36" �J A No Improvements Recommended —>36" N A Improvements Recommended Waste Water Treatment Plant Iy^II g Future Gravity Main ®AICUZ Q a 0000-0 New Lift Statim Future Land Use for areas the increase in flow gue 2023 zFuture Farce Main Employment >a Existing FM Residential „ qq 0 1,000 qq ao a Feet 238 a4 so �o o� A P v AGENDA MEMORANDUM µoRPORPg4 First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting January 23, 2024 1852 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting January 30, 2024 DATE: January 23, 2024 TO: Peter Zanoni, City Manager FROM: Ernesto De La Garza, Director of Public Works ErnestoD2Ca)-cctexas.com (361) 826-1677 Ordinance abandoning, vacating, and closing 8.0118 acres of improved and unimproved public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing City of Corpus Christi to abandon, vacate, and close 8.0118 acres of improved and unimproved public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle, which is located between Yorktown Blvd and Oso Creek, requested by Petitioner, MPM Development, LP, subsequent the construction of Osito Way, Mapache Pass, and a portion of Oso Parkway as well as fulfilling other conditions. SUMMARY: The purpose of this ordinance is to abandon, vacate and close a 8.0118 acres tract of improved unimproved portion of public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle, per the preliminary plat for Oso Creek Corner Phase 1. The Planning Commission granted its approval on October 19, 2022. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Section 49-12 of the City Municipal Code provides the procedures for City Council to establish or close public streets, alleys, or other public ways. A request shall be filed with the City containing the description of the street, or portion thereof, that is to be opened, closed, or altered. Moses Mostaghasi, representing MPM Development, LP filed a request to abandon, vacate and close a 8.0118-acre portion of Starry Road and Starry Circle, which is located between Yorktown Blvd and Oso Creek. MPM Development LP is the owner of the property adjacent to Starry Road and Starry Circle. The closure would allow for future housing development which has been dedicated to the City by plat. If the area is closed, it would be owned and maintained by Moses Mostaghasi. If the City agrees to release this portion of public right-of-way, Moses Mostaghasi, MPM Development LP, is responsible for: 1. Dedication of a 15' utility easement from the west boundary of Starry Road right-of- way toward the center line from the City's lift, starting from the City's lift station site and extending 1,667.71 feet north towards Yorktown Blvd, as shown in Exhibit B; 2. The full build-out of Oso Parkway from Yorktown Blvd to Mapache Pass, as shown in the final plat of Oso Creek Corner Phase 1 in Exhibit C; 3. The fill build-out of a driveway at 7738 Krypton Drive to the City's lift station on the City's drainage right-of-way. A review of the request was conducted by City Departments and external Public Utility Companies. The Planning Commission reviewed the request to close, abandon, and vacate the public right-of-way on October 19, 2022, and recommended its approval. Additionally, a fair market value of$0 is recommended in consideration of the construction Osito Way and Mapache Pass (estimated value $4,170,704.11) by Petitioner. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is to deny the closure, abandonment, and vacation of requested portion of Starry Road and Starry Circle Road. FISCAL IMPACT: If the City agrees to release this portion of public property, Moses Mostaghasi, representing MPM Development LP., is responsible for the compliance listed above regarding the construction of Osito Way and Mapache Pass (estimated value $4,170,704.11). Funding Detail: Fund: N/A Organization/Activity: N/A Dept: N/A Project # (CIP Only): N/A Account: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and the Planning Committee recommend approval. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Exhibit PowerPoint Presentation Ordinance abandoning, vacating, and closing 8.0118 acres of improved and unimproved public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle, between Yorktown Blvd and Oso Creek, conditioned on the Petitioner, MPM Development, LP, meeting specified conditions. WHEREAS, MPM Development, LP (Petitioner), adjacent Owner, is requesting the closure, abandonment, and vacation of Starry Road and Starry Circle, which had been dedicated to the City by plat; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested parties and citizens were allowed to appear and be heard; WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus Christi to close, abandon, and vacate improved and unimproved public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle, between Yorktown Blvd and Oso Creek, being approximately 8.0118 acres, as shown in Exhibit A, subject to compliance by the Owner with the conditions specified in this Ordinance; WHEREAS, the construction of Oso Parkway eliminates the public use of Starry Road as required by Corpus Christi Code Sec 49-12 (2); and WHEREAS, acquisition of Lots 3, 4, & 5, Section 35, Flour Bluff& Encinal Farm tract from the City eliminates the public use of Starry Circle as required by Corpus Christi Code Sec 49-12 (2). BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. In consideration of the construction of Osito Way and Mapache Pass (estimated value $4,170,704.11) by Petitioner, the City hereby closes, abandons, and vacates right-of-way for Starry Road from Yorktown Blvd to Oso Creek, being approximately 4.4 acres, less a 15' utility easement, expressly conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the following requirements: 1. Dedication of a 15' utility easement from the west boundary of Starry Road right-of-way toward the center line from the City's lift station site north 1,667.71 feet toward Yorktown Blvd, as shown in Exhibit B, to the City; 2. The full build-out of Oso Parkway from Yorktown Blvd to Mapache Pass, as shown in the final plat of Oso Creek Corner Phase 1 in Exhibit C; and 3. The full build-out of a driveway at 7738 Krypton Drive to the City's lift station on the City's drainage right-of-way. There shall be no closure, abandonment, or vacation of right-of-way for Starry Road if the Petitioner fails to comply with all the conditions outlined in this section. The City retains a 15' utility easement from the west boundary of Starry Road right-of-way toward the center line from the City's lift station site north 1,667.71 feet toward Yorktown Blvd, as shown in Exhibit B. The abandonment of Starry Road is not related to nor affects the City's Drainage Right of Way Easement, Nueces County Document #2017043998. 1 SECTION 2. In consideration of the construction of Osito Way and Mapache Pass (estimated value $4,170,704.11) by Petitioner, the City hereby closes, abandons, and vacates right-of-way for Starry Circle from Starry Road to the eastern boundary of Mapache Pass as shown in Exhibit C, being approximately 0.9 acres, expressly conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the following requirements: 1. The full build-out of Mapache Pass, as shown in the final plat of Oso Creek Corner Phase 1, as shown in Exhibit C. There shall be no closure, abandonment, or vacation of right-of-way for Starry Circle from Starry Road to the eastern boundary of Mapache Pass, as shown in Exhibit C, if the Petitioner fails to comply with all the conditions outlined in this section. SECTION 3. In consideration of the construction of Osito Way and Mapache Pass (estimated value $4,170,704.11) by Petitioner, the City hereby closes, abandons, and vacates right-of-way for Starry Circle from Mapache Pass to Oso Creek, as shown in Exhibit C, being approximately 2.6 acres, expressly conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the following requirements: 1. MPM Development, LP acquisition of Lots 3, 4, and 5, Section 35, Flour Bluff& Encinal Farm Garden tracts from the City. There shall be no closure, abandonment, or vacation of right-of-way for Starry Circle from Mapache Pass to Oso Creek, as shown in Exhibit C, if the Petitioner fails to comply with all the conditions outlined in this section. SECTION 4. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the Ordinance, all grants of public street right-of-way closures must be recorded at the Petitioner's expense in the real property Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the affected property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. Failure to record this Ordinance in the real property Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas,within 180 calendar days following approval by the City Council will hereby make this Ordinance null and void. Introduced and voted on the day of , 2023. PASSED and APPROVED on the day of ' 2023. ATTEST: Paulette Guajardo, Mayor Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary 2 EXHIBIT A ,..awU. Smo / 4 a .a� o \ om EErc I THIS IS NOT A LAND TITLE SURVEY RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT EXHIBIT m vwo \ =nru"sR / / \\ spa arW°�q BEING 8.0l I8 ACRES / n.rgpB , ro°e� \ �s�" OUT OE THE / qpO�e "` � EN RIQU EZ VI LLAREAL SURVEY, A-1 °A. �a° '"� 0 CITV OF CORPUS CHRISTI i"'A' kk9'r NUECES COU NTV,TEXAS _m..ema�$ om caa-x / aRp/ Q�c JUNE 2OF 9" s�o PAGE 1 OF 1 a FA: QUIDDITY CIVIL ENGINEER&LeND SURVEYOR FINAL PLAT OF EXHIBIT BOSOCREEK CORNER PHASE 1 10D10"hyo zoo 300 L—,\—,l QUIDDITY A103.015 ACRETRACF OF LAND,BEING ALLOF LOT58,9,13,14, ` ANDA PORTION OF LOTS 10,12,AND 15 SECTION 34,FLOUR scat[. _goo °Tde;5'.k'm:m.: :e`i'e`me:'m:"m BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS,IN VOLUME n,n u<rniusmm. ¢ e "N',PAGES 41A3,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS, a corvr_Teo.a.T.oba°¢n,anis CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS #y# « DATE OF PRIM:Augurt 3,2023 Pg �R 7S—T me ( �s'� _1� F011s5,9 -YM lcTOA�N BLVD a a1 z sREE sREET asREETe � I° J = II _ LOCIAEION MAP sTI /erne ' 'O� a - o zum �II % .css J Pre. Isaf MAB A 11 1I ReI Ts9 o -- 15'UE �` y\�H�JJ _ su �r II uue \. `—� III nuuearaaaamrne oso we¢xas mrvracr R¢cReanory me_ r 1 s w�leeuTx III a.mearaa—,II Tnrvc¢s n E"11rv1 1I1T1 E 1E 1RA owN n¢x¢ary zo wsTeawnT^as-_T —TE11-1111N.T— AsElr TEn TIE InIT El I� xxza ° eAieme awx n¢R¢orvaR¢rwvoaa oarvw,uoereaMmeo 0 em E sl wiTn rv�saaus xrlaec�rvl ,-1 TIE caM¢iN¢o -- �� ✓ ' ° oaraIIEIENT.�o¢P ¢o.aaR�a¢M¢NrarrN¢NNT¢ TcoEE n__EI TocNa Ea rN¢�N Ma. 6 w AC o�P resNNwry TIE no w ALL¢, B.�P¢oes¢R�aT I ^ o ¢N z oAe�ooN N Ra�a6aTaNDN oN o z T�Naaea�a ��>�� TE— C o� N ff i &L L w �� T NaP.AEEL. ,EER r o...AE" E'��aoaT�orvreorTrv�¢T aar rro�ry 5 UE o w,ocasa o PL3"piL u r aFEEaarea�-EI—PRaR o s' a AND o li ,a rvTRo¢oTIE TE"B.SEPANAT¢ �. El ION NG EIEL—ERT ' , - ]9.939 AC s w °� s rr lDT2 Fl—ILAT a sou cissa nen rvn�`vures a�cnu ru Tu erauxs srerrt 8695265E 28.3]0 AC mNNDEELNTIANDAnI 1,2359625EFARM —AN T[,c= Ill bm5--E—EE THERE - ARE NE E_T NG IRA RA GE ST To LTO THE EAST moo" THE AIR RRv RaAo C Row _- -�- s IgHe14 oP¢cary srvoT rv¢wnx Nrx¢c4m—i Mcrs or Tx¢Ier oeorves _ �ITO ...- IIc I arTARZYNrEw—H1NTHEPLAT—ARea wiLLrve rnseo rv.ola PI (SEE acaT NOTE 41-43 11 ' a II� IF --0�� III IIi 2 o III LEGET M« O 'a urervcP — uw reecoreos rvurees rouMr Tx ireory reap fw/w suneco - _ caN6 cmRos,rvu� � III — _� I/ a ------ - ry reoo rvry Tx — —— reiu(sa xaTr sl —— I iPE0ENT ¢recrvr us[N[N� s ro E m "' LEGEND 15'UE y111 III r�asrMexra(mol __— x T T I 15 foot Utility _ SII II [os CrnCos o/rNE 'w PLaT PTNI II aux E s Nc LasEInLN _ s s Easement --- - - - _ Ilii o � r on "s ¢ I LE u' ue AS ss' a e_----__ 5 E ao.�a 11a IEE 12a8A msF 2u 11 x% .ice' h -.a SEE SHEET FOR LINE SXEET2 CF6 N AND CURVE TABLES EXHIBITC CMLENGINEERGUWDSURVEVOR FINAL PLAT OF OSI CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 ==—ElNl- L\ QUIDDITY A1M.035 ACRETRACTOFILAND,BEINGALLOFLOT58,9,13,1 or ixifo olxcarur�mA"TTrrTxasxw wo uxo.wsauuE E E IU— pFe.^e ma...;no*.Ee i90o�5gy®m ANDAPORTION OF LOR 10,12,AND IS SECTION 3q FLOUR aEVEq axAr EAgME—APPHowx vEDEDlu D—EvU— PE BLUFFANDENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS,IN VOLUME ISMM wMMADEfaaaHEIIINANPUIPME DUDE11PUILI AN[ow ITMAT DO--,AE.be�pi,RPLs "A",PAGE541d3,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS, IN. CORPUSCHRISTI,TENAS ISaxE_DAry zD� DATE OF PRINT:Augus[3,2023 l��v/ g+•e F MDgsuas.HAN,A—EE.ADENT INOEXMAP ufm aFxuE® J SITZ w uMEa EUNDERRRxEDAUn1MMINnIIDMPMMAMMPEMED - - a.E SAME foa axE vuarasss AxD MxxoERAnoxs V V - Mme — LOCATION MAP wx ICER-HM1DANDPEAL—fflCE 3� SCALE.1=3000 NION.—LICINANDI—E—EafaExAs LOT2 lOT1 2R314AC ATE aTEw 19.938AC / 1.235,862SF xrt DPxuEm 8616528 SF � l \ IFF I aPME �R.RINEE , EDarDf.�PD,ap T , _ Do RTME DAraf DDx o DD�Na�Dz�— Dre ��RE„DIx�R z z ,T.,EDPTE.M I �o TMsfNMPu.DfTMEHERExDEPREo.DD PEA_APR�ODxRE��afTME I r arDfMRPaRaa�,��AA,mP�NNDMMMRRDx � � �� .... �. RTME DAraf D=x i Al �TEERT�oaP� oPLlllll No.. N.MEo.=�R 0P,RNCI Ca»l. xrt LOC. 1 s\ D) -IMAPPRDDED—EDMIPMEN1 — —— s L-1114nvaBAc sss ""A IN 'EM,of axE an of WRP_'-111NIPLAT—EHEREINDE 1111P:_roue 1,744M2 SF saxE 0 220 LIFTTLIN P3998 Rise 1 20 EcmR oID—OPMENT.—C. 1 ecus INI lNIl xrt DPxuEm 1555 AC J / DoowNER ipl o s3ao�n - — - C reoo w cw sun co ,—IHmE —r xf EEI.R..xc Mir.-xE_ ss48535FN. _—_ coNcl N reoo NVlTl mabeD lx vDL PACES EMabso euim muiir — Ds rec D w -- �C_ — - , Nl 1911 NM 1� DAr of SDaSA• Dm ac zea o.a.a. e a �P aD PEau acxc sax Sm MWHMIr of Dfum MUIT III MRPUsaxsR, _ - RE o.a roucw D SEM A•aff a x a DoT z zaz�uxEs s se ncrecs aEM s.DSD AIIE wiV zsos`orevus Cnres c.v or-cDPaus ares �A xPx DEVE�ovxeN,FP w�.z,ee PC szN o.P.re. "Hx s D—ExrxD ooc Hn zczzozsn.C.a. II wµE w.sEwa.Ere SEN. .............................. ................««.. .........,...........,. ..........,. ....,w�.zea v.re as,s. wee wnrere�Ne usexeM COU.,amx DE— masa xiaEm inn ainniTMiifu��siRUEAAND mRnic�uTMio wM Of— THERRnnaxAr PROPm wDIxEmIxD MxxoDunox xASREEx DIUEN-D SEE SHEET 6FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES iD:PH E.r 11 PEND.izmss Sl ETI Orb EXHIBITC CMLENGINEERGIANDSORVEYOR FINAL PLAT OF C 50 loo 200 300 OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 o L QUIDDITY A103.033 ACRETRACf OFUWD,BEINGALLOF=11,3,13,14 %,.�V®azo ANDAPORTION OFLDT510,12,AND 15 SECTION 34,FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS,IN VOLUME ONSTAI PAGES ,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS, _Am_A._D ` "A",LE C1CORPUSCHRIrl,TENAS DATE OF PRINT:Augus[3,2023 21 NIEET3 81EET94� vorr (4 sr/. ac) ..6 0 519 0 12.11.11111. Tc \ __ s17•e VORHTMN—Danaow usT MUTES _ w 41 07 R. 0 NIEETA SNEETB INIEETf +"e LO o12 5 a-9 59. 'z xo'rX zv'vreY ALEo 1 3000P � ..rz cT I I' 'was ur'ty n lid erel 12 -1511, M XEYAP F —— s s „R, . s u1 v~ wlE E,„III HE—IO a¢xxa AxEASAxaED—ZO,EsAD'EN mmx °I xxEO�m u¢E Ams V� �zox�IxAo eLAs gT¢ v reInry ==E, OTa IMa�9 Mxx xOsoPus O — xx2a uemervTlae"M mfg¢.APrLmrnaixm o II EREM uENAVOMIMI Asl¢ INED � moE AND—ND—TO axxoEwsmEzaxwa raA, axiom alxfA¢sruE ucmx Of s.oaaoa •u�EIEVAnoxsalOwxx r nafsoegxvnnox. s.xxErAxo xEOuixExrexr,AsoEPicOn,is AxEWixEfnExrof xxEuxifim poE��PMExr x r ETomsruTlEV Mu mxmixasoxzw—1 OF uxo ixcwoixc Z s'EE III �/ II smEm E. omiunox. w „ A// z.AvnEDIxam f¢. F—INvxAxaxAiEmAf,rAx¢�smswa, r zoz;funoxsaf mismAcfARE,.:_,N OT Ocmem sA —DEomxExealnom zoxE x. oA � s'us '°� N Amnxowa TO THExnnoxuw¢uxosixvmTaw,POrtxTu� ° wmuxos¢isrox arE wAxEx,wnsmvAiEx sor/AuuaEAxo fu¢FES alusaEfuo Pxiox � p a O a roxzmxoAnox Of xxEfxufuT s ez ne 8o'w zoeza' t o `7/ Ts'us so.Auonan AxoTEN=E.ES xr ROw"IIErsozouTm rvswAMxE oux¢m oxmE I. fxu PUT 19.939 AC s wE III l s rr I83{AC uNDASO oEUEsofmwnx avmu _ 868,5265F oMoslu. mExuvw /�_, I�Ie yl� 1,2359615E SU'L.IMEN1—ESS AsILIENu ILI EFOO,SIN rLEovunoxouxxo ra mEiEaisora¢o DOM—ELE USE 20 TO CL C aow - _- Wano"�sxoT xuwnx xxxE mraNnsof mEOr ofoxzs '^I. n Pc n,-n3 Il11liI _ (SEE PLAT 15) III 3 II mraxaNAN.. wI,Hlx,HEfuTrePAxMM¢xE¢mm NOTE LEQE n Y II R m II III Ic aEOcaos rvuEas couxry rev O I O III 'Tsre^ryw_ nuo2Rcun x -'IRreooreolowncrw`— lll rourv6o 21 N nwfvoo Ury[[N'111-1 O — —_ ?F' - ———_ s us m 11 = relax _------_ x TTI T ( 1 sEMErvr(�o, ILI FAIL C CH/COS OFNE � �x Zy l6o'aUB[IC ROWI IE E'IT REOVIRESENT E 5 NG EASEMEN M I I e � c�o III -------_-- - fO uE u 11 uc s c� a T ey Tv a»t ss”w aa¢z. n lO s'cc $ —` ---- 0013.13075E -h s m 1AC 7080 .... SEE SHEET6 FOR UNE 4 AND CURVE TABLES SLEET2 OFFS EXHIBITC CMLENGINEERGIANDSURVEVOR FINAL PLAT OF OSI CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 o sa goo zoo Soo L\ QUIDDITY A103.033 AOIETRACTOFIAND,BEINGALLOFLOTS8,9,13,1 scu[. _goo mxrAm nw®ALn^`m.:a.,�.`d..si;<,.�„azo ANDA NDENNOFLOR 10,12,ANDS TRACSECTI0NN FLOUR BW FF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS,IN VOLUME INTAl "A",PAGE541MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TE%k5, obe�piPnPLs d3,CORPUS CHRISTI,TENAS DATE OF PRINT.AUgu 13 2023 °s+ wa -1— W, e - 25 Wde Fgnt or !IFFY] 1 g o sus. yORKTOWN DLVD p — — - Ems ex sl rvc OP.RB.CT. xITC� L_ \ -uLn Mule g . �cp co 0 FR�4� NIEE IS '�wFEEs - � — zv'vre _ —— -----_� ��'�•.,� —`�� 3 / LOCATION GL1-3000P 0 I rn v } � I O w rv` I� oExyuLxmg M ry 3 r '- '°" � --- - 1.roTu xuMNd Cf RUILDANIE LorsA m ° L RHE REmNN6 WARER fORRHE EIORM WARER RUNOFF iROMRHl6 ° v PRWERD IED. mmE.RHETaDIwEauRfIm RHEAWARICufE ° of foRRHEDm rnmEAE'Fx[EmaxAL'AxD'oIEIERwARERY.T[ED um GREGORrzm nlEom CRE..—NTARRECREAnox'UEE r n n e = E.THE REARIx;;Dlsnxcq ASEMAxDmDRDIxAreEDlowN xENEox Z n ARE DDIRDlw,iE nsrtM NNS RID,mUT�zoNE(NAD'.LAA --- ,- 2 IIIIRINEDNf;LOMLPDRnoxING a;mA I;Pq MRx NGEDPUE o POETMM WRNmN4n DEIITDfU IIAU ILL U.;MRIId L, :ETT mxVERTORID DIsux[dro mRfA[E,AwLY n1E mMNlxm oRlDromRfA[ES[uE M_I of l.DDUDa z > p a uLE1EVAnoxE9lDwx xEREDN ARE NALI-SNI UM,ASDETFRMIxm � D_.DN:RVAnox w s.THErARO REDO=NTMDEP rnv,sAREau REMExrofTHEUA, w ss'uE o y DdfLOPMENrmDEANDsmMEnro aAxoEASTMEzax xc MAv z 3 m x;E. — I s'EE o Q S.TMETorALruTDV AREA mxmxaNA AaEEof uxo INCLUDISI. z IN T.AmnROlxcm IENAILm NmNAxa—MAP,AANEL�smswc, r DcmeEA q,zDa Pmnoxsaf AE,.:_,. SL ;SvcnmwA r9/MNDEAceANDEPARSFESRULme FAIU PRIOR o 1DTz -—_. ` III wErNvsEeAreAre 11 o ITHINTrevlITum slumvu�SNI.REoro.coxa I zamaae — YNT THean DAxo; y235,9625F ocx.zvz3vzesLs _ SU'L.IMSEN1s1 11MLoNE sd ANL IED NI IIN da;Mu EE Dm¢opm IN T'uo .NSIo Na.UUERN1. IirtR MULnfAMILr,EDuunoxAL AxD II AN"fAM Lr DEve'AF RxoL fAM Lruddo"E". AxnoPATEDro mxrux APPRDIHureLv ass UNISEPERA.E THENE II ARExod....MNAEE_U%An.axsse THER IR...D M.LTIAILTVTHEEAn xro om dmE Psopvm sxoT xTxEUR xsruunax mMPAnNLEUxzOxEs sa TWx[wnRE morcrtD L EswlsH xTHE mr L M.ITHE an of CIA ♦ WITHIN THEP-D AREA SILL NE amenn 'STAN oxolxAxa. I r rr:cun vv rvry 11F- ZPCMN21� \ V,1 ------ _ - rvreU \ (sa rvme w T, RD�xoAxr � vLOSCHICOS ORII/E 8 ---------------- — s�rr L' LOTS 21. 40.138 AC \ 1,748,4075F SEE SHEET EOR UNE AND CURVE TABLES - FAviEE(3 Q�6 EXHIBITC \ o oa CMLENGINEERGUWD3URVEYOR FINAL PLAT \ryl\ OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 SCALE 1 so 100 200 30o L QUIDDITY A103.033 ACRETRACFOFLWD,BEINGALLOFLOTS8,9,13,14 w v a ANDAPORTION OFLOTS10,12,AND 15 SECTION 34,FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS,IN VOLUME emINTAl NTAm 11-11 111PRPLs W,PAGES 4143,MAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS, CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS DATE OF PRINT.AUBURL3,2023 a, SHEETS SHEETB � 4C\ III SHEET4 SHEETS �SHEET4 is ��1 w s ^« l.s'r`✓ LOCATION MAP SCALE.1" 2000' o nE I I o REYMM ` a I d f. ADDS DD �A sUNEE ICCINS. mo0.o RECREA NEED. �xNE(N.-LASGRANTEE ESE r D APARTMENTSGROUP.LLc I sma�IDPq Mix xDRDPus� EVILOLAreMANAGEMENT GRToi 0 cg202102229 mIF�CE,A_DHEW mO _ e GEo«ARExADD.DAnM.ED�INm - NIFIED --, 1 - r ---------- _ E-----Lill IDT., Ervr mPEREACC.AIN.o zRRµA�ER F—IINCLUONR z s a M _AND Dm N �RAEMA PANa�.m em«� `'PSfrE LOT4Mz>unoxsaFix RmAnAAE LDUTmDx�p oocx.zvz3vzeszv 80.138 AC `a 1,7 48,4075F R_wAE wA--"AERLOTACUEAE AND vuu FES alums FAIN PRUN N. [mRAOIDxO6U an�o%AL O ss OE oN.GTNNpYOTIGp 11—CIL-1—PUTINAIDDIFINAMICNINDDEVELOPMENT oocx. DAROSNO[a99INE Rn1Ef oAL PUGT Ig9REWIREDIO BECONas1ENT� AL III I CRSS D YR wPRRANTY 1121 Al 1PNA=N. ENE,SUL ED—ED IN "UN TIES NLLARREAL E=_= M�ULnFAMILY,EDU—CNAL AND GRANTEE #1021 6S Ax028118 ASEnOPAEOTO mNTNx APP0.0 UESY AS5uN11SPE 1.NUAIIGE OCM00 O P.R.N.C.iCASE . p ISNDTINIIEAIRINEEDS.—NmMPA BEUEZONEs - 2 III 19 TMmn.G� LIE.wNIIx,IE mYLIMN:DF,IED,Y DF 0U. o11.� wNIIN,IEPG DARMMIIEIMIRi I 0 DANNAxE. IIS LECEUQ M« II� _ Roo ry�s,>NPEo li ----- _Roxs 1 N RDD PIT rr „of ---------- _ NRDISLL NDrE 51 ,oN«Naw, T� rauxD,rs� x g N n� TDDRN P. c sLA,NOTE G _dPG IT 1 151Aw � e — eoao LOTS & E P 13.555 AC 5 uE -- RE ENT �� A s•O \ 54,8535E / � m -------- ExsiriNc EnsEMEnn n zaY Fre r v \ vorc crwrvos 4ROAD gv Cil ORDINANCE - c FLa 9oUNOPR - 2 r / r I o I w �w�aoNE^asw , �NE�=ray„ G oE� CUT ANA I IF o-a- i VILLA MPNAaEMEIr J r vorervrlaL wETwrvw �_ ar _ L POCp2o2,021291 Iry Oocu e¢ FEL 157.0 OP 4 zv3vz _AM E2 X202 SEE SHEET 6 FOR UNE 4 AND CURVE TABLES 9YEE74 OF EXHIBITC CMLENGINEER®UWDSLUIRIMR FINAL PLAT OF 00 00 00 OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 o so L QUIDDITY AIM.033 ACRETRACf OFIAND,BEINGALLOFLOTS8,9,13,Iq > ANDA PORTION OF LOTS 10,12,AND 15 SECRON34,FLOUR n BLUFFANDENCINALFARM ANDGARDENTRACIS,INVOLUME s s INTAI "A",PAGES SlMAP RECORDS,NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS, mxrAcr wanobe�piPnPLs d3,CORPUSCHRIrl,TENAS DATE OF PRINT:Augus[3,2023 �M-2 SIEETB #STT£ SXEET9 SHEETS SHEETS — x. LOCATION MAP XEYMN SCALE.1=3000 A NIA IIMIIM IIINIMIIIIMreElI HEREON .o NEIN.'®LAE SEM IEPq MRx NGEEPUE Rf�ALE,Al nEmMel m SRIOTO S1RfA[£SEWEfAC1oR Of l.eaoo6 Z a uLE1EVAnoxERleWx xEREex ARE Nave'®oARUM,aSOERmMIxEo � 1.—ARD I.—IREMENT—EUNIII. MN I 111 moE AND Ims mIN9lexxWµAalE9of WxoNlxcwolN6 Z OTS /L / 0EnAxNC4133AC ioR;Pnox I—E-11 — I,74,4075F eST —uD.INwm -L smsm o nl..: �AnRL /,r .EAN.PARK 1.1.—E.1.PRIOR � ro REMM oN of RHE FINAL PUT. 1o.ALLunuw ANO—.'E R--R.o.W.EASMENIEONN-Tm n ESA— IIHINRHI91-HALLmxfI MEPNSSPE 11MENT MRPEIUo[a3.91n1E fINU PUT IE REWARD—Ec -NT REsuwa;WILL D-01. N. RMOL,.faMIL..EOUGnoxALMo °N:o .—LE—ONE. mYMPl lA,. W"HIN ,HEOI DARMM IEIMII aQE / I¢ u ------ n M« ------ - RO Ree�.P S.NPEo I as ---------- °SCRory - pliao.^, MA o "("IEPARATE_ — l -- E� LN _ e Sia ------- PLOT I.—AllP� LP ,, o H Roes 30 P , i 40 R111,0 HE�ON IA IN o s :n H��,�o..NNE IE - e OOSEE oSH LET FOR LI NE a� 5' ETS Q=6 AND CURVE TABLES EXHIBITC CMLENGINEER.MDSORVEYOR FINAL PLAT OF OSI CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 L� QUIDDITY A103.035ACRETRACfOFLWD,BEINGALLOFLOTS8,9,13,1 ANDA PORTION OF LOTS 10,12,AND 155ECRON34,FLOUR scaL[. _goo wINTAI xTACE 11-11 RE BWFF AND EN4EI,SAMRECORLFAR S,NENTRAOU TYVOLUME >8 "A",AND ENCINAMAP RECORDS, UUM obe�pi,RRCs CORPUS CHRISTI,TFNAS a DATE OF PRINT:Augus[3,2023 a m V \ �l NIFETR� NIEETE I \ i `� �\ \\ LOCASCALEIONMOAOP 3 CC NIEETA ENFETS .:NIFETE \ reaeicw orn orea rvaerrarr rrvr csxmu xmv `\ \a oars ervr evornr ocu e¢z IRME J \\ rRI IE-onszfn meow as'f¢s�cnxn�nnecnfwnox RUI ILISE \ ea ptl" NNIoM11MASARAxo MI.elxATEcs�owx xEREoxa NEIxAo . Z ` s�IRErni xT 9 u R suRUvn w, outs / IIAsx,AILImEcomxxw (7 LL NIIIED LL I DEIAAD .DE AND�mx�oxzwµAaERof xP xcwP xc Z \\ 000lxvRANNERATENI.,AME.ism �,a> o o;xfewwE °o ':` �Ix.b LO)4 A [uIN.TDI'N=EPxE'x'. 39.831 AC \\ ; Lm/AaucE AND PARS FES MALL.E PAC R0.oR 1,735,046SF \ EfxALRUT I �MEf xuflnT9AN REW REPTP REc�Ofl.srtM� �t\ N. J� FARM SUILOINCEANo AMILY REslxwa;WILL ExEVFtoRm IN TwPfxA9Eslo lN.UOE0.LTULflrt MULThfAMxYEPU—MALAx 9N E e AN ARExEADD T1EalE sP0.oPc¢o TMp ...TI.IEAIR xsrALurox�oLRR NEUSE—Es , 11 -DE �� Epps LEswnx xTxELm Lransof mEar of usC ESDASx Ix' wmxTxE—DARumuxElMll / LDADI w. x iz< url°Esrvarearz Irccun s„ 4', ooex.zve3mezv ovcs reo°w cw sun c° n Irvsrre r rvrevorn aryorT clu vue�c aLwa s rvuLc s cp,creol`ry N reo° a R°(sa rvo L 11 s.) oa "N IS Io.s3ao>>22021111,11 a pur eouN Darer CLOS 1� a oxOwaNcc Eo 111 r ,ire rsasi ,aan° ,ns55r. ,,.w e €i Sh'EET6 CF WLFNGINmli LAND WRVEYOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 L\ QUIDDITY A101015AO TRACE OF IANO,BEING ALL OF LOT58,9,13,14, a``e"§' .:..;",`o r:s5a :no�,<,gy®m ANDAPOREION OF LOT510,1;AND 155ECDON 34,FLOUR BLUFFMD ENONM FMM MD GARDEN TRACES,IN VOLUME m11A1 11-11 oneI � "A,PAGE5414,MAREMRCSCOUNT,TEXA$ NRAcc_A.n0,RLs CORPLISOAR191,TEMS DATE OF PRINT:My 1420M LOCATION 3000 00P - ° UM2 > -- LL - LOT I ,_ � ----- - 19.9%AC 1,a5,%LSF 86;6%9P \ SCALE 1 300 ss [w - i� t P,GAGWE,WALE, a.«+— EuisiNc ovExu[oD ELEcraic as vs ExISIING GAS AT c 2 v0 �o eR 1.TPE-11111AMIM—MININIA _ 1 Doc.Na 2ozzaZscn.o.x. use ulEaosrzmlxEDm uEmAs mxrAnEE REA us[ xs;uDlsrAxzE;uDCW ox hssxuvx x[nmxm IrDxE IxA 11IM o I l Ep9 wnx N;vws _ W ZDnin Table EEEax AEExnw Esonnra,AEDEFENN 11 Fa P ID ACRESI T DDDEANOsmmEnloo EAEI 11111ff CA CA PUS CHRISTI 1. 1. FRe-d IIoE Ditdtt BD � '2 DRANIEC Io I I - /�\ ;AcmxoxaroE,xovAoxALwmAxosixxvmwErfRmmn�uox; MINI AC 1N - mSDN T[xm .E' o . rz D Q Prop dZ g FIF - ll EluxDSIX Sr Dx 511E NegbborboodC "'I CTIOF CORP! - - _ WATER,wAsrtwAnlEET/IDNE xD RAII 1EEE Nx EEMID MIR W General Com rc al OOCg2 IAE9 4O]BBACMEN 11 Single FNI am ly4e5 - 1,1409W N: A11 A' mP A.Lsvu=i ND mx�mmx x;DErL_E RA Single Fam ly 4.5 caarvl[ S RNN LR, DD _ os(uou.;�lxEf xu fuTfsEEW RED EE mxasrtfn o- RE;xDEVELTM 9nE SPRaPegO ¢o MNE ED D NALA x IENNLE 9TEE MULn fAM LY D'ACREC AxD ENE E ryAPADyF�P0, wWAa IENMIx n1EAIR IxrtuunON caMPAnEIEu¢xaNE6 I.OE6 MPO 1 ooc »>. Es lAM E uzswnxlx lxEar urnlnaf lxE mraf 4sssAc „ IUDN 154869 SF oac. ovmlEE io.siao s; IxEEUT1Ev x LEGERD Got owes �s.o�'pra[s Lc rvry oPrervm A'T c FLAT A211EI 0DTv2AT 9 opp0s wxsl ciry sn cORaus DRrvc* coaos rvuraEro pqq D p R roc pre. c ry oUIIATI -1- u"a aeCDaos xuE reo` - ....z0zsHISF sr «..., AL Asa mE rycreary o sueCLD fL "- ........ - ry aoo ---- 111 rvmr 11 -� r' rDDrvo /z a as inn n� w•�,ux 'rew HIT-ex 0 o ao' sD L iio iio sa no .o u i.0'JLS, ao' 'I30 14.0 110 La"D' I 1V _-_--_ PAUL BOUNDPRv L B LOS CHi COS DRIVE _ � � �••� MAPACHE PASS O'ROW OSITO WAY(FROM YORKTOVNV BLVD TO LOS CHICOS DRIVE) OSITO WAY(FROM LOS CHICOS DRIVE TO MAPACHE PASS) ROW ROW R0W R0W Approved by the Planning Commission on Oct.19,2022 � 1�0 sA � ,A ,2.4 � fiA � ,2.0 � ,2.0 2.0 I_ ao� i o�wE � 1,0� 50 40 12 0 � OSO HARVEY(FROM YORKTOVNV ROWBLVD TO STA.24+56) SEE CURVE TABFOR LES AND CURVE TABLES OSO PKWY(FROM STA°V24�R5fi TO MAPACHE PASS) SlIEY-77 OF - a NLENGINEER&MDwRVEYOR o PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CM L� QUIDDITYDD OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 AIO3DISAO TRACTOFIANO,BEINGALLOFLMSS,9,13,10. ANDAPORNON OF LOT510,1;AND 155EC'ION 34,FLOUR BLUFFMD ENONM FMM MD GARDEN TRACES,IN VOLUME nene.piPnRLs "A,PAGES41-43,MAPREMROS,NUECESCOUNW,TEXA$ CORPUSOIRISEI,TEXAS DATE OF PRINT:July 14.20M �s c to torous cn,s e oT1111511 0 g oa s1.. i SIT£L� ce aler ne - - VORKTOWN DLVD E F__ NIEETi -- E - t19 1 LOCATION L1-3000 P r ne J k sD re s UE z I\o,rIII ry M $ IIII EE sv vre �M4 IIEETD MEETS B.cT ss J II- I le�tui tv i AID IS ElElT — r— ��) l EI �I> oDBD,u,B x T T - \` `� E�°ry O.P.R.B.C. XEVMM� of PRE-OEVELOPM y - 1ARROW -- S _ _ N III wwE PLAT Sou NDPRv s.rxER W RUNDfff IS 1I 11E Ul / -- -< _ s wlclec uIN/ yi �xm �UCOpprnYlmlmTDI E.aXEWER ° Nary xDNE Ixw DLns 13. 11 uEm rvTlsE�lrv/ ExmRGp NGS", —— 1 �� Sao ELEcrrelc - /II Rfna,`wRviee mann leim wT Dom— ISTlrvc c<s IlI "NnRENnw®Dnroa,nsorlERalx w w TmDE.DllDm ouNIEncrxEm11— LA Exlsrmc ovEBv fEEr.romxvERTDRID DIsrnxcEsrom N. GaoromRucEsruEfncmR Df c.DDDDw I I a nu Euvnnoxssxowxx m ar Gramsfnvnnox. S.mErnxD REDUIREamTncoennm,IsnREDuaErnExrofmEuxnlED II DEvuorMm \ I w 11/ G.mivinLRUTIfD uan mxrnxssm acnaEsof uxD xauxxG scuE v •RED D N s I IE h — MA/ wormwAsmu�hnlm�pmuMD MR fEIIIIIe MD MIR o �o Ill v wwE r _ ollWII RnD�n.aRRR,RD.E"aNfm,sDmu,ED�,EfRR„ _-. AnDNDfTMEfnufuT 1 11E I EE LOTz nx NrxsfuTx�uL mx Rrn TDmxxG DE P'.INT 868,s265F I I IIl 283J4ACsluou.S»rx�E fRNu urfsREnu REDrossEmxsasExr _ /�_, IIIe L2359615F IDDL v[ao DI s lPmN[D v¢ofmLlx elrtE rnuLn-fnfnrxE asE is vafDgDD a To cL PueLlc aow -- - vs; aNLENGINEER&MD WILMOR 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CM L� QUIDDITY DDOSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 AIO3DISAO TRACTOFIANO,BEINGALLOFLMSS,9,13,10. ANDAPORNON OF LOTSIO,1;AND 155ECDON 34,FLOUR BLUFFMD ENONAL FMM MD GARDEN TRACES,IN VOLUME n111.1 PE "A,PAGES41-43,MAPREMROS,NUECESCOUNW,TEXA$ CORPUSO-11191,TEXAS , DATE OF PRINT:luly 10.20]3 SIT£ e_, 9' -VORKTOWN DLVD 0 Lp_ - lIEET3 lIFETaII Is atT< >x ' - -- — [TTS' LOCASCALTION 300I ONP EE sD vre \'� III NIFET4 NIEETD �.�WFETR III o LF�EnIo III "ID REDxREMExT N yT XFYMM OI yEAIE I—PRFOW ' Pur ID1PR / m _ ww PPOPOSEo WPSEWPTER Z c also GIEGORIxm IxEOm vlEIXa3 mMaRREalMllox U9E ss 11.1CIED STOFM SEWER / x6;x�ol l%Ma E.VI IWRDIlx 1E59M1M IUMIIm 0 NE lxao•oLM e«>—T E111:1c 1ExxEII ELECTRIC — x III smn IE.ME x;sows EI TIIgWW N' xfuaEi rr�ix[mfvn Isxm 0� 1 css E s xc cas ry ` ' 3A.DEMAMR.N [s[ax ux[xuw®.—M,us orrtxfalx ✓ p w •moEMomxralxs m.nzaaEeo v LA uxo lxauo xD II II � axs'miuom`i'•fu ILDDI�suoi oW^IxTMlERaxu aessmswD o 1.IW=IAmeuahw<oTFaaM�DD Mll Ill DIALLL talo PRIOR � 1111 383J4AC ,WT2 \ a (evs 1e .�e�aTMDl Am u IlMWRMW NW.....T y235,962 SF r ` /� III SIL vo�ne,slDA mEaxomsofm wnxxv L \ wm;wl,EDU—¢Dvmlx � r^1 III �I aIrtE NULn-fafnnr�ouunoxuaxo I faRu Ru;om;sono ax;LEE TsvorxMEsm lxauoE RETaR III a E,fuu;r oEvftoffaExr.axaL faRnlLv oEVEL ufxTls J axnclP mmxTux aRfxmluaTELr ass uxmfmacREmEM II a RE IIIIMIIDEMNMEMUfUREsoxas Ea ISRROfDID romTfuLm Txusr_o 'EM 11 EM:PEU LIE11MIN mE ar LW1111TxE mr 11 / III 11 s; x T fulsm M i 1 II II 1� EGERD M I 111 n YRN IL ---_ ss rvry \ 1 II11 1\ L 1 ________ m�v cRUx N Roo uP suePEo \ 11 1 T1\ — - — 111 Nm 11 - — - of_ EWIL clreic easEUEm >)>)It \ �off. mss.- pT xLOSCHICOS ORII/R= x�_s b �a'P�/Bu=Ra4✓/ ��__��%�'Wlf�' v sEc�t — LOTS b —— —— A0.138 AC s wLE F— sVVR 1,748,4075F p Y 6 .............................................. .. ..u ..�.. ..0.....................................i....\\ ., 3y SEE SHEET 6FOR UNE S`=3 3OF6 .� AND CURVE TABLES ` WLFNGINmli LAND WILMOR DPRELIMINARY PLAT OF CM L� QUIDDITY UD OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 AIO3DISAO TRACTOFLAND,BEINGALLOFLMSS,9,13,10. AND A PORNON OF LOT510,1;AND 155ECRON 34,FLOUR BLUFFMD ENONM FMM MD GARDEN TRACES,IN VOLUME nene.piPE "A,PAGES41-43,MAPREMROS,NUECESCOUNW,TEXA$ CORPUSOARISEI,TEXAS DATE OF PRINT:July 14.203 T� I 4 LOCAEION300MAP - - VIII NNLT4 5 �;,INELT4 11T —— 9 KUNIM y POST OEVELOPMEM FLOW PRROW _ PUT--ll sze ea st w»cs zn ww APARTIA - c l,- LLC 1.AxE lFuuxe;x m E.ulAx�U COartA I=N aXm 4 PROPOSED STORM SEWER r IIIA ooLcg2 2No2T225 A.EmxAs m[uDIxASE sss¢M GRID mum xDNE xADo As I L orrtxralxm n_MD rosmoxwI nsmn lsrg wlm xcsovus s.'sono _ ins REa UT L N LEGEND UI IIIIItt o cr+ANTc. _ ux sox Z I aRoaOs[D wAsr[waTER _ s J I ulDu MlgIlN N' w vRovUs[D wnTER W msax AxsxAw®DAnM,AS DE 1. ESO ELECTRIC woofs (/ B IIII x�AaEAMx'Isx[mrmnexm ois ms Ex srxc cas ffi T�i VIII Z lWIlff (A 11 ssee n,e mDEAxomx ALxs masAaesIF L11 of uxD xauD xo Z ev0,n�l III LOTS 40.138 AC 1.Al_ L 5 I,748,4075E eI.EixexAnoxuwesLAxD xvwmm�lEasmnAom D III it '1 51 U1.IW=IAs AreRL T/At IEMD Mll IIIIE PAID MIR O ,v rel nto wo �, sv vre LL.IxsmuMExs mAuxEREmmmAxDu!¢'==p DxlxExxALFT. 5.003 ACRES -1- 1 (gooeywluDuvlNlmrxu lurslsxEWlxmsoia xEm ashM� DDL ISANTE 'KLA EN'N% ARREN- III I. ISISANT Dm[Es,wlLmi EDEV¢o mLlx OCOP 111211LDR T III M.Lm Ll,DUunoxu All ...--. - R III IIPII DID O II 'Wm IE Nor IxmEAIR lxrtuunox caMlAnetEu¢xaN6 'w la 1 III ss. usswxxx TMWILL ,E^EM" ==- xreD ��s.TLD M L cx xDe �I /939.L5O55 A9C8 L xD,L 11-------- RCROPDDL "L --__ _0.3 T5 - t I � uE � 154,895E III� �M III 76 ao LRo Pue'Cre TC r c A' PA AILLA IINA E n°LOEUE`� SLA°° Coreaus NRls�l LDF 0in� R`"�DooCoCTD2,291 x,N �„ R S INT,LP cP SEE SHEET 6 FOR UNE 4 OF6 AND CURVE TABLES .Ei1EE/ aNLENGINEER&M wRVEYOR 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CM L� QUIDDITY00 OSO CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 AIOIDISAO TRACTOFIANO,BEINGALLOFLMSS,9,13,10. ANDAPORNON OF LOT510,1;AND 155ECDON 34,FLOUR BLUFFMD ENONM FMM MD GARDEN TRACES,IN VOLUME n111.1iPE "A,PAGES41-43,MAPREMROS,NUECESCOUNW,TEXA$ CORPUSOIRISEI,TEXAS DATE OF PRINT:IuIy 14,20M 9IreL� NIEET311: NIEETiI LOCATION MAP SCALE 1 EODNIEET4 ENEETE NIEETE 0 'All IIIIIIIISLIT x Rl L NEYMAP ---- 111T DE-11MENT PIAT EOUNDPFY FLOW ARROW f AIS.GlE6oRlxml EOW v1EIXA4'WMnRREafAllox'USE W Z UTILIN LEGEND 5.AHE NEND RO1—.1A AND..ORDW—1 NN vN xERmx n ARE IIXAS WDRUMAIE 1-11111.mum 111E INAD'®LAS o ww P.......Was,EWATER oEIERMWED n__POSm.xIN.SfSmA I.fS,Wlm N.soN3 ss PFOPOSED STOFM IS -- P.ST III IN uxEA0.MEA5uREME1n IEu.S.mRVIX () w e // / RIAa,APPLY THE mNDWED — octi EPI ELECTRIC EREON ARENAw®oAIVM,A3oElERMIx ED a,s ays WE EWSTING GAS LOTS TWDEMDIIllEUMITHEEDWlMffZ AD.133 AC 1. IAEE I . ID 1/JAS,4075F I r ARE L.—D IND. — AL WATER,YI�SIEwAIMER,N[rt/ALR"E'NI ryAR FEES, DDAOWPRI.R O RDA_ ENIDEDI ID LMR.EEu.t E) Ef NU PUTfSREW REDIASEmx951Efn� i EM.SAD AIL,MS HR L�Eu� l INN'LEELI Pmw.Ll. TMa.DERAM „NALAR' r TMI I.DmMmE L—E :A P...a.s =5 - N � `-- r acre° °1 IIIN°°°1111 N-11 GPs PL° Ems, ,i baPaDa -- °�ID5341 oPR 1 , 40(POW)PUELI1 RELEAST.ED D TP., W --- _—— — Mll z.T %11 OI NO 2022025551.O R — ORP z D .o SEE SHEET 6 FOR UNE AND CURVE TABLES SY ET5 CF - ONL EN6INEFAiLAND wRVEYDR PRELIMINARY PLOT OF L� QUIDDITY 10 ------ OSA CREEK CORNER PHASE 1 EISITING EASEMENT A AND ASAOiE TRACT OF IANO,BEING ALLEC LON 3,FLOUR0. ANDAPORNONOFLOTSIMDWDISSMUSI34,FLOUR • '®�o�uv",�° PRE oEVELOPMEN Flow ARROW B"A',PAEE41N, AP RCORGARDENTRAOUIN VOLUME € F s e mNRAej LaxlxE rD.0,R ILIICIL-1EIELPIPENT Flaw ARROW "A',PAGES MAP RECORIS,NUEaSCOUNTY,TEXAS, mxucr nwanobe�pi.RILE PLAT e0ux0aGv CORPUSOiRISTI,TEAS Q DATE OF PRINT:My 10.2023 PROPOSED WASTEWATER4 R EASTPDC CIER1EA1 ELECTRIC NIEET3 i1EETEI F=InINC L LOCATION MAP \\\ / i1EETA NIEETE SCALE.1"=3000' \� � rtAE alTEqu `" � W;1-11"61x1 rlER511 n1E ux1 EDWxA.ax ID'AR,A N E \\ ro,noye orement\ `l =D11 11 ME 10"EIIA.L.mEE1;Au€ErTM=IREy%fIi�Rx;RMDERm v� , \ \\\ (evseeo.ore lnnrument ev0m 1 ` I _FEM x�M� ERE1x (mv 1R Il'U111 A \ \\ IY/ _ DW"ERAn0xn1EAEI,DPREa1. l \� AFL000PLNN IN: M1ESM14u0xAy AUm1MEDA0EM 1 ee outran Star — E s \ 1w¢RA9'EAmm Xu'AN—D'rn41EA W'EDN DN L'R 0 - rn18fu1¢S/�RGSAx1[010.1 xA191tMx xERElxm o RN WD 1 'SGS um 1xE Ix 11IM umr ui—® s vre 0 OWNER 053aovi \ EREIN ARENA®RDAIVM,A311EERMx \� \\\ \1 -i.. }� .RR[;APPLY IE.MRxm ED ffi Z EM11xEURDN Z 1I—.1E1 I IE DPA, _DED xE�"E Rl mR IEDE P1E1snE DPE AND mN;1EA mDEMD�D,A,�= x�E"o o wa�o:G w.0 n[x nlivluiG urG SF.0 Gf Gff[[ LOT�4 - WN.xm vsflx G(rt WxlG xvmmm.fmmneL 39.831 AC \\\ AlEv_E.1111,PIRnaxs.11x51R AEEmusDx�G � r I,J35,0466FU.N.D.mxE K- .ED mxE'X PE mRDxI DE IENAlOxu \\\ WAIEIL,WAGIEwAER DT/I—OEAND 1ARx IEEE s1ALL RE 1ADPMOR O x1uEPURL1xAN1 f1R1xE SulElf lExAs \ NDR ALL 5Epu��ND mNERMmm xG DRML EV¢11"RA 1D ALL-L" 1E \ � xSmuME ua MW \\\z a G"xMRDS Iu1cA1s1n1EfxAL1uT15E0u RED REmxRS1"T m DPEmx.I D.EL IMENDR—DARO; [pMn alxUEo3 \V sv'vre \ 12 n1E DEV¢11MmT,aRRExnr Mlmr UxDEVEL11m Wm.=.'L IN DINGSAND .1xEUNDEAAGxE1,ALaxal PROfEV OxumD xER N1xE4mE Of lENA z'wt[ UM ,�` ILE El RrtE M.—NL1�DUGnlxu All mmr ENnnlxAr1R11EAmG xEEAxGmxalvanlx xns R[m Glrex lx slur 1 :UN PER ERE 55.`0 _ A—MDEDDRDIDMN 1AR DA EAR xUll INxcG E1 IIus[zDPII ID MW_MDDPEU,_ 'EM �TIEL1E1xE roRev,1Ex01:nsA �'i \� s(AIDE E 111 LEswnx xlxEOr LMn111xE mr11 RAE PEU N. mm�DIMAx;A REED lRDlmOxu uxl RUNvm0RN DHE a 1S A. oxnx1xA11x slur smuEAND MINErnAxl xEAEEwps ssz (evse��= A. of 1xRU E 1.01— DE UNDER 1EAwx1x 0xmE0R "v \1/\v hOueW ------ N Ierr"nE rvry NIN DE-A—U—I.R'Lsxl.mu i} --------- ------ wRcreu N loo ul suelLD RN xn0lxuEmL"N'ZINIIIALINT 1111 rvm[11 III 'D mR1OR.Mm,EIEIN lEAASE11I DAN ED x11-lxG mMMIs91x111. ax eExAtfElxE �\ 'OT RE-- _ -_- 511E Dpr Of xlzz t—�r) 00 oWNEI c. mwrtTIE llnuEmi _ 1 1,—A—D;E.—aERxaf muxtt,l0 NA ender,BADD-. / —� 1EAEm DE.,11ADDHIN PurwAS IRE.Im EmxD lx"r 1x 1xE ( IC (ROW)P _DAr Of al.zba,Ar�.1 AnD1ur ROA TO BE R 0 �u 1x E .1 of A.D.zlz;Ar a�innm a res am.w en.cz �e�zsz xsts.rz a�en nan IN DHE..RE.-0101 uID muxn, Ix R01[/vaw"E III DHE I.I. [ARA WD;muNW AERN,NU EM cmxr,DEARS IDAN A.PI"m1E41.E.-D"E—R of PURU[—R[S muxlr END IN SHEET 6 CF6 ZERO o600zi?• ................................ CORPUS CHRISTI Starry Road & Starry Circle Street Closure Request City Council Presentation January 23, 2024 Ordinance ' Section. 49-12. - Petition to Council to Close, Abandon, Vacate, or Alter Streets, Alleys, Etc. • City Municipal Code provides procedures for an applicant to file a written application request to the Director of Public Works requesting that public right-of-way, or portion be closed, abandoned, vacated, or altered. • Right-of-Way shall be only abandoned if the right-of-way is not currently utilized or no longer needed for public use. Process n 1. A pre-application meeting with the Department of Public Works and designated representatives. 2. An official application request shall be filed with the Department of Public Works with supporting documents. 3. An application fee for $1,000 shall be required for each applicant to process and coordinate further a request. 4. An applicant must provide an appraisal by a MAI Certified Appraiser. 5. Internal/External Agencies are provided an opportunity to comment on the site plan requested for closure. 6. Present request to City Council for final approval. Starry Road & Starry Circle Applicant: Moses Mostaghasi, MPM Development, LP Official Application Submitted on 06/21/2023: • Abandon, vacate, and close a 8.0118-acre portion of Starry Road and Starry Circle • Application Fee was included • The closure would allow for future housing development which has been dedicated to the City by plat. • Internal/External Agencies provided comments including, Corpus Christi Water, AEP, and the Planning Department. • The market appraisal value (MAV): $350,000 ($1.02 PSF) oRPus�yR PUBLIC WORKS J � Proposed • • Closure(s) ,'.. esz Starry Road Starry Circle � t �. Consideration 40 1. In Consideration of the Construction of Osito Way (not on the City's Urban Transportation Plan) and Mapache Pass Streets (estimated value$4,170,704.11)by Petitioner,the City would agree to close,abandon,and vacate right-of-way for Starry Road from Yorktown Blvd to Oso Creek. 2. Condition upon Petitioner to comply with the following: • Dedication of a 15'utility easement • Full build-out of Oso Parkway from Yorktown Blvd to Mapache Pass • Full build-out of a driveway at 7738 Krypton Drive to the City lift station on the City's drainage right-of-way • Full build-out of Mapache Pass • MPM Development,LP acquisition of Lots 3,4,and 5,Section 35,Flour Bluff&Encinal Farm Garden tracts from the City 3. Osito Way is a proposed collector,not identified on the City's Urban Transportation Plan, within the Oso Creek Corner development. In lieu of construction of Osito Way,a payment in the amount of$0 is recommended as the fair market value. There shall be no closure, abandonment, or vacation of right-of-way for Starry Road if the Petitioner fails to comply with all the conditions outlined. Proposed Collector Streets I 1mz g BnnBBF r n.BYBx � �' II uiasws I � � •1 � B Osito Way s,sezassu Y PHASE 1 \R •:; � how�wmra[non & Oso Parkway - �• : L�B5.0163F t � SHEET9 uuua /-J _._._ PHASE 2 Mapache Pass BYMAY Al51 L333A1)SF �'�130A51 AC s,se:Ascu �� 7 f) Recommendation City Staff recommends the approval of the abandoning, vacating, and closing 8.0118 acres of improved and unimproved public right-of-way identified as Starry Road and Starry Circle under the conditions outlined to the petitioner, MPM Development, LP In lieu of construction of Osito Way, a payment in the amount of $0 is recommended as the fair market value. s