HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 12/10/1969MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
December 10, 1969
2:00 P. M.
PRESENT:
Mayor Pro Tem Gabe Lozano, Sr.
Commissioners:
Dick Bradley, Jr.
Eduardo E. de Ases
Ken McDaniel
Ronnie Sizemore
Church.
City Manager R. Marvin Townsend
City Attorney I. M. Singer
Assistant City Attorney Amador Garcia
City Secretary T. Ray Kring
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano called the meeting to order.
The Invocation was given by The Reverend Edwin T. Brown, Pastor of Sts John Lutheran
City Secretary T. Ray Kring called, the roll of those in attendance.
Motion by Sizemore, seconded by Bradley and passed, that the absence of Mayor Blackmon
and Commissioner Roberts be excused for cause.
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano recognized members of the Student Council of West Oso High School,
and presented Certificates of Attendance to : Richard Alaniz, Danny Noyola, Honeybee Smith,
Mary Sustaita, Oscar Sifuentes and Isabel Escamilla. The students were accompanied by their
sponsor, Mr. Jerry Muttera.
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano called for the City Manager's Reports.
Motion by Sizemore, seconded by Bradley and passed, that the City Manager's Reports,
Items "A" through "C" be accepted, and that the requests and recommendations be granted and
approved as follows:
a. That an agreement with the Lower Nueces River Water Supply District to authorize
a total payment in the amount of $381,000 to the District for District debt service, and agreement
that the District will not levy a tax for the 1969 tax year, be authorized;
b. That an appropriation in the amount of $1,300 for appraisals by Roy. L. Temple con-
cerning Parcels Nos. 46 and 48, in connection with acquisition of land for the Oso Sewage Treat-
ment Plant, be approved;
c. That the oral notice relative to the oil, gas and mineral lease dated December 4, 1968,
with Kelly Bell as Lessee, covering 130.268 acres of land in 78 tracts, be accepted in lieu of
written notice that the well was completed on February 24, 1969, as a dry hole.
•
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 2
ORDINANCE NO. 9572
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LOWER NUECES RIVER
WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT WHEREBY THE CITY WILL MAKE PAYMENT TOWARD PRINCIPAL
AND INTEREST OF WATER DISTRICT IN ORDER TO AVOID LEVY OF PROPERTY TAX BY THE
SAID WATER DISTRICT, ALL AS MORE FULLY SET FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT, A COPY OF
WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance was passed by the following
vote: Lozano, Bradley, de Ases, McDaniel and Sizemore, present and voting "Aye"; Blackmon
and Roberts were absent.
ORDINANCE NO. 9573
APPROPRIATING OUT OF NO. 250 SANITARY SEWER BOND FUND THE SUM OF $1300 FOR
APPRAISALS BY ROY L. TEMPLE CONCERNING PARCELS 46 AND 48, IN CONNECTION WITH
ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR OSO SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, PROJECT NO. 250-61-25.5;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance was passed by the following
vote: Lozano, Bradley, de Ases, McDaniel and Sizemore, present and voting "Aye"; Blackmon
and Roberts were absent.
City Manager Townsend read and presented a formal statement in response to questions
raised by Mrs. James C. Scott, President of the Organization for the Preservation of an Unblemished
Shoreline, in a letter dated November 29, 1969, pertaining to the alleged illegal construction of
the Canta Mar Apartment Project at 4222 Ocean Drive, which letter, Mrs. Scottstated she had
received no reply.
In presenting the statement, Mr. Townsend reviewed the history of the case in question,
pointing out that a building permit had been denied on June 3, 1968; was appealed to the Board of
Adjustment on June 25, 1968, and that the applicant, Mr. R. W. Depuy, was apparently able to
convince the Board that the City had reduced the depth of the lot by acquisition of right of way
for Ocean Drive, and that drainageway and erosion along the edge of the Bay constituted unusual
lot conditions and hardship of the land, and that the Board unanimously approved the request; stated
that as to whether or not the Board exceeded its authority is debatable, but that the Board had shown
commendable diligence in its review of information presented by the Staff,and that the Staff had
no reason to conclude that the Board did exceed its authority; that their decision that there was a
hardship of the land was a matter of judgment which a court would probably be slow to overrule.
• •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 3
He explained that this project had been inspected more frequently than similar projects because
of the interest which had been expressed, but stated that it had been called to the attention of
the Staff and Council through a member of the Council and not through the news media as alleged.
Mr. Townsend further explained the Staff's role in supporting the zoning ordinance before the
Board of Adjustment and the procedures and policies for following up on such cases. He stated
that he finds that the facts in this situation are clearly in favor of the owner; that the project is
being built in accordance with the City Building Code and the site plan approved by the Board of
Adjustment; that the matter is closed, and no further action is indicated. (Council Exhibit #12-69)
Mrs. James C. Scott was furnished a copy of Mr. Townsend's written statement.
Mrs. Scott stated she is not satisfied with the report and questioned the Board of Adjust-
ment's authority in this case; questioned as to whether or not the site plan had been revised since
it was originally approved by the Board of Adjustment; cited a case in Abilene in which a property
owner was forced to set back a building, and its intended use as a garment factory denied; alleged
that violations of the City's Building Code are taking place and that the City Staff and Council
are derelict in the discharge of their responsibilities to correct the situation; that the Staff should
assume a greater role in arguing cases before the Board of Adjustment; questioned as to whether or
not the decision of the Board of Adjustment can still be reversed; stated the minutes are vague and
lack sufficient documentation of evidence to show hardship; and stated that the Staffshould investi-
gate the land fill behind the project, pointing out that it may have been created over state-owned
submerged lands.
City Manager Townsend stated that for the Staff to place themselves in a position of
arbitrarily withholding the approval of permits or any other type of authorization simply because
they have a personal dissatisfaction with the project being requested is so wrong as to "not be
worthy of further discussion." He stated the Abilene case which was cited by Mrs. Scott is
neither pertinent nor comparable to the case in question since the case cited was for the use of
the land; that the only reason the courts might revoke the existing building permit would be
finding that the Board of Adjustment acted arbitrarily in concluding that adequate grounds existed
for taking the action to grant a variance. He stated there had been no delay in the investigation;
explained that the Staff has for the past eight months been presenting a written opinion to the
• •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 4
Board of Adjustment in all cases before it and that a procedure exists for Staff appeal to the
Council when it is deemed desirable; conceded that the minutes were not perfect but that
corrective steps have been taken in that regard; that there was, in fact, sufficient evidence
and information before the Board for them to conclude that this was a hardship case. He assured
Mrs. Scott that he has certification that there has been no substitution of the original site plan
which the Board approved; pointed out that the use of the land is clearly not in question; stated
that no laws are being violated, and that he takes exceptions to the remarks.
Mrs. Robert Flato, 4240 Ocean Drive, stated she has been an eye witness to the land
fill, and that she thinks it is intended to be used for parking. She suggested that the Staff investigate
this aspect before construction is begun on another building, that if they cannot have the parking,
they would not want the building.
Comments from members of the Council indicated unanimous support of the actions of
the Staff and the Board of Adjustment as presented in the statement of City Manager Townsend.
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano declared a brief recess before the scheduled public hearing for
Sidewalk Improvements,
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano reconvened the meeting at 3:00 p.m., directed that it be noted
that a quorum was present, and announced the Council would hold the public hearing scheduled
on assessments for the proposed Sidewalk Improvements, Unit V, consisting of construction of
concrete and shell sidewalks in portions of the following streets: (1) Alameda Street, from Hancock
to Agnes; (2) Brownlee Boulevard, Buford to Agnes; (3) Chico, Howard to Commanche; (4) Howard,
Chico to 19th; (5) Clark, Norton to 150' east; (6) Norton, Naples to Ramsey; (7) Naples, Shely
to Norton; (8) McArdle Road, Rodd Field to Nile Drive; (9) Ruth, 22nd to 25th; (10) Santa Fe,
Craig to Morgan; (11) Weil Place; (12) McArdle Road, Nesbitt to Johnston; (13) Shirley Drive;
(14) Karen Drive; and (15) John Jones Park. He stated that Assistant City Attorney Amador Garcia
would conduct the hearing.
Mr. Garcia explained the purpose of the public hearing and stated the Staff would offer
testimony from the City Engineer, and evaluation testimony from a real estate appraiser to sub-
stantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and stated that the
• 4 •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 5
hearing was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would determine
or establish the assessments on the abutting properties.
Mr. James K. Lontos, First Assistant Director of Public Works, presented and plans and
specifications for the proposed sidewalk improvements and explained they are part of a proposed
project designed to provide access to several schools in the City. He described the nature, extent,
and specifications of the proposed sidewalks, and stated these plans and specifications were prepared
in his office under his supervision. He explained that the sidewalks proposed are to be four feet in
width with the exception of two streets where they will be five feet in width. He stated that the
total contract price, based on the recent assessment policy adopted by the Council, is $47,533.20;
total assessment to property owners is $22,557.78, and that the total cost to the City is $24,975.42;
and explained the manner in which the pro rata share was computed. He stated a problem has
arisen as to placement of the sidewalk on Norton Street where huge palm trees exist along the
curb; that letters have been received from the property owners requesting that the sidewalk be
four feet in width and placed against the curb, in which case the palm trees would have to be
removed; that as an alternative it had been suggested that the necessary easement be obtained
from the property owners and that the sidewalk be placed back of the trees and narrowed to three
and one-half feet, and that the proper adjustments be made in the rates. -
Mr. Harold Carr, real estate appraiser, testified as to his background and experience which
he felt qualified him as a real estate appraiser for all types of property in the City; stated he had
personally viewed and understood the extent and specifications of the proposed improvements; that
he had personally viewed the preliminary assessment roll and each of the properties to be assessed;
and stated that in his opinion, each of the properties so assessed would be enhanced in value at
least to the extend of the proposed assessments, and that he does not recommend an adjustment
on any single piece of property.
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano gave property owners in the audience an opportunity to state his
approval or objection to any of the proposed sidewalks or assessments to his property. The
following persons appeared:
• •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 6
Item #47 - John R. Thomas, Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block 9, Bayview Addition -
Mr. Charles Hale, attorney representing Mrs. John R. Thomas and her three daughters, stated
the notice appeared to be improper because the property had been described as being located on
Clark Street, but stated he would stipulate that the described as correct. He stated his clients
were vigorously opposed to the construction of the proposed sidewalks from Craig to Buford on
the basis there are no school children, and no need for them since there is no pedestrian traffic;
that Mrs. Thomas is a 90 -year old invalid widow confined to her bedroom, and that the proposed
sidewalk construction would be within a few feet of her bedroom window which would be a
nuisance and an injustice. He pointed out that the City had allowed business zoning in this
area which does not necessitate construction of sidewalks; that his clients are willing to have
the shrubs removed if they are objectionable, and that they are opposed on the basis the improve-
ments would not benefit.
Mrs. Otis Bowers, daughter of Mrs. Thomas, spoke on her behalf concurring in the
statements made by Mr. Hale, and pointed out that sidewalks exist on the other side of the street
all the way to Del Mar with the exception of an area in front of two buildings; that there is no
bus stop, and that she feels the proposed sidewalks are useless.
Mr. Carr stated that he had studied this particular property and that it was his opinion
that sidewalks at this location would definitely benefit the area, pointing out that the property
being used as a residence is not the highest and best use of the property.
Items #143 and #144 - Alfred Mayorga, Lot 35, Block 1, and Lot 34, Block 1, Loma Alta
Addition: Mr. Mayorga inquired as to whether or not driveways had been included in the con-
struction. He was advised that they were not included and that if he desired driveways he should
make arrangements with the contractor, and that credit would be allowed for driveway cuts.
Item #147 - Felipe Villa, Lot 31, Block 1, Loma Alta Addition: Alfred Mayorga spoke
as interpreter for Mr. Villa and inquired as to how the payments are to be made.
Item #12 - First Free Methodist Church, Lot 12, Block 12, Southmoreland Subdivision:
Reverend Smith appeared as representative of the church and stated the members are opposed to the
sidewalks on the basis that they already have sidewalks in front of the church, and that another one
would only clutter up their head -in parking and create a hazard by cars having to cross the sidewalk
into their parking area.
•
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 7
Item #22,'L. H. Lester, Lot 20, Block 15, Arcadia Village: Mrs. Lester stated she was
not opposed to the sidewalks but that she wos opposed to the 4 -foot easement proposed between
the curb and the sidewalk, which would cut down the depth of her front yard and necessitate
destruction of her palm trees. She suggested that the sidewalks be located between the palm
trees and the curb.
Item #15 - B. L. Miller, Lot 13, Block 15, Arcadia Village: Mrs. Edna Miller stated
she was heartily in favor of the sidewalks, but that she could not understand why the City per-
mitted that subdivision to be developed without sidewalks in the first place which is penalizing
the residents at this time. She stated she would be willing to sacrifice the palm trees if the plans
could be modified to construct the sidewalk next to the curb.
City Manager Townsend reported that letters had been received from three other residents
in this area requesting that the sidewalk on this street be placed next to the curb. The letters
were signed by Thelma Doughty, Cora Atkins, and C. 0. Ward.
Item #35 - Mrs. Lena Williams, Lot 1, Block 16, Arcadia Village: Mrs.Williams stated
she was opposed to the sidewalk on the basis it would decrease the size of her yard; would
destroy the only Retama tree in the entire neighborhood; would be too close to her bedroom
window; and that she does not feel the school children would use the sidewalk.
Mr. Lontos stated the assessment had been reduced fifty percent because this property
sides onto the street; and that it will be investigated further and a recommendation submitted.
Item #18 - Martin Flores, Lot 16, Block 15, Arcadia Village: Mr. Flores stated he was
not opposed to the sidewalk nor the assessment, but objected to the eight -foot reduction in the
size of his property, and stated the sidewalk would be too close to his house.
Item #30 - F. A. Voelkei, Lot 21, Block 19, Arcadia Village: Mr. Hamricks stated that
if the sidewalk is going to be imposed upon him, he would like to request that they be placed
next to the curb.
Items #52, 53, 54, 56 - Carroll Jones Company, Lots 12 and Lot 1, Black 4; Lot 1 and 24,
Block 3; and Lot 10, Block 2, all in Heritage Park #1: Mr. Phil Jones appeared and stated he
was opposed to being asked to pay for sidewalks located on the opposite side of the street; that
he felt they should be constructed on both sides of the street; and inquired if the individual
s _ •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 8
owners could contract for the construction if they desired and found it could be done more
economically.
City Manager Townsend stated this would not be feasible since the contract had been
awarded for the total project, and would be too complex. He explained that the School System
officials had been consulted as to which side of the streets was most desirable for location of
the sidewalk, and also a factor which was taken into consideration was the side of the street
which has the greater number of houses, and which has the most intersections to be served by
the sidewalks.
Mr. Townsend stated that the Staff would review each and every one of the requests.
No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed sidewalk construction.
Motion by Bradley, seconded by McDaniel and passed, that the hearing be closed and
tabled for further study.
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned.