HomeMy WebLinkAbout02944 ORD - 12/12/1950i
naff"; 00n
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON OLD ROBSTOWN HOAD FROM THE
NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF AGNES STREET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY
LINE OF UPRIVER. RQkD, AND TO THE REAL AND TRUE (TiAIERE
THEREOF, AS TO SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY
AND TEE REAL AND TRUE GMERLS THEREOF, BY VIRTUE OF THE
IHPROMMTS OF SAID STREET WITHIN THE LMTS DEFINED,
AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, AND INVALIDITIES OR >RMEGUTARPTIES
IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ON CONTRACT THEREFOR, OVERRULING
AND DENYING ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED; FINDING
AND DETERMINING THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SAID OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD, WITHIN THE LnIITS
DEFINED, WILL BE SPECIALLY BENEFITED AND ENHANCED IN
VALUE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID
IMPROVIIENTS PROPOSED TO BE MME, AND AS HEREIN ASSFSM
AGAINST SAID PROPERTIES ABUTTING UPON SAID OLD ROBSTOWN
ROAD, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A
PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVING SAID OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD
WITHIN SAID LIMITS, FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN AGAINST THE
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OR,IM CH OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
ASS38NABIZ CERTIFICATES UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE
OF SAID WORE, THE W12M AND TIME OF PAYMINT AND PROVIDING
THE MUM AND METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SAID ASSESSMENTS;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, by
duly enacted ordinance passed and approved on November 14, 1950, determined
the necessity for and ordered the improvement of Old Robstown Road within the
limits hereinafter defined in the manner and according to the plans and
specifications heretofore approved and adopted by the City Council therefor
by ordinance dated November 14, 19502 said portion of said street to be improved
being as follows, to —wit:
Old Robstown Road from the North boundary line of Agnes
Street to the South boundary line of Upriver Road,
a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of
said City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and,
WHEREAS, said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas,
after having advertised for and received bids on the construction of said
improvements for the length of time and in the manner and form as required by
the Charter of said City and the Laws of the State of Texas, and after having
duly and regularly made appropriation of funds available for such purpose to
cover the estimated cost of said improvements to said City, all as provided
by the Corpus Christi City Charter and by law, did award a contract for the
construction of said improvements to J. M. Dellinger, Inc, on its lowest and
most advantageous bid and said contract has been heretofore duly executed by
said City of Corpus Christi and J. M. Dellinger, Inc., and is dated Vovember
140 1950, and the Performance Bond required by said contract has been properly
furnished by said J. M. Dellinger, Inc. and accepted by said City Council of
said City as to fora and amount as required by the Charter of said City and
the Laws of the State of Texas; and,
WIUMMS, the said City Council has caused the Director of Public
Works to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and
estimates of the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the
property abutting upon Old Robstown Road, within the limita herein defined,
to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said Director of
Public Works has heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of ether
matters relating thereto with said City Council, and same have been received,
mmmined and approved by said City Council; and,
WHMUS, said City Council by duly enacted ordinance dated November
142 1950, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that
portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on Old Robstown Road
within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property and the
real and true owners thereof, and did order and set a hearing to be held at
4:00 o'clock P.M. on December 5th, 1950, in the Council Chamber of the City
Hall of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property
abutting upon said street, within the limits above defined, and for all others
owning or claiming any interest in#" or otherwise interested in said property,
or any of said matters as to the aaeesamerrts and amounts to be assessed against
each parcel of abutting property and the real and true owners or owner thereof,
and as to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue
of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error, invalidity, irregularity
or deficiency in any proceedings or contract, to appear and be heard in person
or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said matters; and said City
Council did by said ordinance order and direct the City Secretary to give
notice of said hearing to the real and true owners of the property abutting
upon said streets, within the limits defined, by publication in the Corpus
Christi Times, the official newspaper of the City of Corpus Christi, a news-
paper published in the City of Corpus Christi, Terms, of general circulation,
said notice to be published in said newspaper at least three times prior to
the date of said hearing, the first publication of which to be at least ten
daps prior thereto, all as provided for and in accordance with the provisions
of said City Charter and of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session
of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as Article
1105 -b of Pemon*s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and,
WHffMS, said City Council did further order and direct said City
Secretary, in addition to said published notice as aforesaid, which was pro.
vided to be valid and sufficient in itself, to include in said notice a list
of the apparent owners of said abutting property as set out in said Director
of Public Works' written report, but providing that said list of apparent
owners and the description of said properties, so included shall be merely
cumulative of and in addition to the requirements of said notice as required
by law and shall not be conclusive as to the real and true owners, or the
descriptions of said abutting properties, nor limit said notice to such owners
named, or the properties described, but that said notice shall nevertheless be
directed to the real and true owner or owners of said abutting property, whether
named or correctly named, or said property described, or correctly described
therein or not; and,
WHEREAS, said notice as ordered and directed by said City Council
and as required by said Acts and Charter of said City as above identified,
was duly given by publication of same in the Corpus Christi Times, a news-
paper published in the City of Corpus Christi, Twins, on November 20, 1950,
November 25, 1950, and December 2, 1950, said notice so published having
included therein a list of the names of the apparent owners as set out in said
Director of Public Works+ written report as directed in the aforesaid ordinance;
and,
WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as
provided by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing
of which notice was given, was opened and held on December 5, 1950, at 4 :00
o'clock P.M, in the Council Chamber of the City Nall in the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time
an opportunity was given to all said above mentioned persons, firms, corpora-
tions and estates, their agents and attorneys, to be heard and to offer evi-
dence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at
which time the following appeared and offered the following testimony:
PUBLIC HEARING
RE•
PAVING, SIDEWALKS, CURBS, AND GUTTERS
OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD
December 51 1950
Mr. Stirman explained improvements to be made on Old Robstown Road, stating
that sidewalks, curbs and gutters would be paid for by property owners
while street paving would be financed by the City and County. The assess-
ment for sidewalks per square foot is 42¢ or $1.68 per running foot. Curb
and gutter - $1.55 per running foot. Curb, gutter and sidewalks total
$3.23 per running foot. May be paid in five installments, the first to
be paid upon completion of the work and the other four payments annually
thereafter, or, of course, may be paid all at once.
Mayor Wasserman asked for comments or discussion by any persons present.
George Miller — Does not want sidewalk, curb and gutter along his property,
which is a corner piece of property now used as a cow lot, because he
feels that if he ever did decide to open a business there or build a building,
held have to take up the sidewalk, curbs and gutters to make parking space
accessible to automobiles.
Mr. Stirman — explained that the Department of Public Works and company
having the contract would work with Mr. Miller in order to develop the
types of entrances and exits he might consider necessary in the event
he later opened some type of business. Sidewalks, curbs and gutter would
enhance the value of his property.
Mr. Miller -- still doesn't want sidewalks!
Durwood Stevesn — Does not want sidewalks because he has business that
would be hindered by curb, sidewalks etc. Besides, he says there is
very little foot traffic on Old Robstown Road and only seven houses facing
on Old Robstown Road. The children will be out on the highway with the
traffic if sidewalks are put in. Not a good idea.
Mr. Stirman stated that his observation was that there was quite a bit
of foot traffic on Old Robstown Road.
Mr. Stevens stated there should be sidewalks in Saxet #2 as in two
years he had seen little foot traffic on old Robstown Road.
Mr. Earl Elkins -- How will the sidewalk go in the Hilltop Terrace Add1n.
where there is an inside drive, which he doesn't know who owns.
Mr. Stirman stated sidewalk would be adjacent to curb. Inside drive was
in the pattern of the subdivisiog.
Mr. Elkins — Does not want sidewalk as there is no need for one in view
of the private drive where pedestrians can travel if necessary to go by
foot.
Z-, A
Mrs, Earl Elkins — AGAINST sidewalks because they will spoil effect
of property and she would have to out down a beautiful tree.
Mr. Wilbur A. Thomas — Lives on the same street as Mr. Elkins. Several
children go to Shell Center to eat, always use inside drive. Does not
think they would use sidewalk if there was one. Objects to sidewalks
because of inside drive.
Mr. Navlor — Wants to do what is right, but thinks there are a few
things which should be considered. Curb, gutter and sidewalk next to
his business, Corpus Christi Hatcherey, would just be in the way and
something to be torn up. Waste of material and time as it isn't needed.
Practically no foot traffic by other property. Very few residences there
and what foot traffic there is takes the other side of the streets:
Feels like it is quite a burden on taxpayers to bear the expense of
sidewalks, curbs and gutters for what little good it will -do.` Need`
sidewalks other places more than there. No sidewalks on Buffalo or
Leo . Doesn't feel like along that stretch of road (Old Robstown
Rd.) si
sidewalks are justified. Is ready to do what's right; however,
he thinks it's a waste of material, time and effort to put sidewalk
in along there. Money could.be spent to better advantage some place
else.
Mr. Elkins — Stated Mr. Gibson who lives between him and Mr. Thomas
vasntt interested in sidewalks and Mrr Shelton who lives in Kingsville
but owns property north of Mr. Elkins, a vacant lot, couldn't be there
but he did not want sidewalks. If sidewalks could be put in "solid"
from his place to Shell Center it would be all right. If there are
t skips, might as well walk in the street all the way.
Ta Mfr. Collier — Mr. Elkins, are your objections only to sidewalks and
not to paving?
Unanimously in favor of paving but not sidewalks.
Joe Garza. representing Evangeline GarzeJ -- 10% for sidewalk, curbs
and gutters; Looked forward to sidewalks, improvements always an
expense. If everyone would cooperate for sidewalks, although it
takes money, it will improve property.
_ Mrs. H. M. Smither — Bartlett and Old Robstown Road — Does not object
to curbs and gutters but to sidewalks. From Peterson's to Shell Center
there is not a home that faces old Robstown Road. In need of sidewalks
in front of property in Saxet 2 but not on the side. She wanted to,know
just where sidewalks would be and how far from the street and how far
from her property, etc.
Mr. Stirman answered by describing just where sidewalks, curbs and gutters
would be.
(Mr. Stirman and Mrs. Smither discussed back and forth the distances and
types of drainage ditches etc.)
Mrs. Smither — Objects to sidewalks
Mr. Liedeker — Mr. Liedeker stated that he did not object if allowances
could be made in sidewalk, curb and guttering his property to take care of
a community center.
Mr. Stirman -- Provisions are made for what property owner wants.
Mr. Liedeker — In that event, no objection to sidewalks.
G. W. Hardflax (Lucille Brown property) — Objects to sidewalks. Will not
benefit in the least.
Mr. Guerrero -- Objects to sidewalks.
Mr. C. Cartwright — Against sidewalks.
Mrs. Norveson -- Objects to sidewalks.
Lloyd Sessions — No property owner, but in the mortgagebuainess and
interested from that standpoint. Sidewalks from school and shopping center
are decided advantage to neighborhood. Has lived in Saxet 2, and only
reason people have had to walk in the street is that there is no other
place to walk. MarW occasions when foot traffic had to get on the curb to
avoid traffic. In favor of sidewalks.
Mr. Singer -- Mr. Sessions, are you acquainted with values of property?
Mr. Sessions — Yes
Mr. Singer — Do you take into account whether property has sidewalks,
curb, and gutter?
Mr. Sessions — Right. All items taken into consideration. Allowance
would be made for these improvements. Should dress up Robstown Road.
Even a business would profit if there were sidewalks.
Mr. Singer -- In your opinion would these improvements benefit all property?
Mr. Sessions — It would benefit the whole area. In the case of Mr. Naylor,
would probably get more business from residential section if there were
sidewalks.
Mr. Cartwright -- It is residential, not business
Mr. Thomas — No one transacts business on foot.
Mrs. Smither -- Nobody goes out Old Robstown Road but trucks, which start
at 2:00 A. M.
ya
Bill Newland -- Not property owner, but real estate agent. Thinks
sidewalks, curbs and gutters definite asset to the property. Property
owners would benefit more than this project would cost. Property
owners do not like to do it now, but it will be distinct asset to them
and to the City, as it will run from Shell Road to Highway 44 (Agnes
Street). Believes property owners will gain more than it will cost
them.
Mr. Barnes Cott — Moved that hearing be closed and the matter referred
to the Legal Department for continuance.
George Lowman — I second the motion.
Passed unanimously.
There being no further testimony offered nor any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion duly seconded and unanimously
carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and,
WHEREAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony being
offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of -said
abutting property as compared to the cost of the improvement of said portion
of said street proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any
errors, invalidities or irregularities, in the proceedings or contracts hereto-
fore had in reference to the improvements of said street; and,
WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special
benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the
real and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making
said improvements on said street, within the l{mits above defined, and has
heard all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all protests
and objections relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidities or
irregularities in any of the proceedings and contracts for said improvements,
and has given a full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to make
any such protest, objection, or offer testimony, and has fully examined and
considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests offered, and based
upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said City Council finds that each
and every parcel of property abutting upon Old Robstown Road, within the
limits to be improved as herein defined, will be enhanced In value and specially
benefited by the construction of said improvements upon the said street upon
which said property abuts, in anam ount in excess of the amount of the costs
of said improvements proposed to be, and as herefnbelow, assessed against each
and every said parcel of abutting property, and the real and true owner or
owners thereof, and said City Council did consider and correct all errors,
invalidities or deficiencies called to its attention and did find that all
proceedings and contracts were proper and in accordance with the Charter of
said City and the Laws of the State of Texas, under which these proceedings
were being had, and the proceedings of said City Counelfheretofore had with
reference to such improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular;
and said City Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments
hereinbeiow, made and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property
on said Old Robstown Road, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are
just and equitable and did adopt the rule of apportionment set forth below
and the division of the costs of said improvements between said abutting
properties, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable,
and as producing substantial equality considering the benefits to be received
and the burdens imposed thereby, and that all objections and protests should
be overruled and denied,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CM COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEMS:
SECTION 1. That there being no further protests or testimony for
or against said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners
of abutting property on said street, within the limits above defined, and to
all persons, firms, corporations and estates awning or claiming same or any
interest therein, be, and the same is hereby, closed and all protests and
objections whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are
hereby, overruled and denied, in regard to the improvements on Old Robstown
Road, within the limits ,herein defined.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon
the evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel of property abutting
upon Old Robstown Road, within the limits herein defined, that the special-
benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and
true owner or owners thereof, by virtue of the construction of said improvements
in said portions of said street upon which said property abuts, will be in
excess of the amount of the costs of said improvements as proposed to be, and
as herein, assessed against said abutting property and the real and true owner
or owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of the costs of said
improvements, and that the assessments hereinbelow made, are just and equit-
able and produce substantial equality, considering the benefits received and
the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance with the laws of the State
of Terns, and the Charter Provisions of the City of Corpus Christi, Terms, and
that all proceedings and contracts heretofore had with reference to said
improvements are in all respects regular, proper and valid, and that all
prerequisites to the .EUxing of the assessment liens against said abutting
properties, as hereinafter described and the personal liability of the real
and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or
net, have been in all things regularly had and performed in compliance with
the law, charter provisions and proceedings of the said City Council.
SECTION 3, That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted, by said
City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvement of Old Robstown Road,
within the limits herein named and defined, and in pursuance of said proceedings
heretofore had and enacted by said City Council in reference to said improve-
ments and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to said
street improvements by the laws of the State of Terns and the Charter of mid
City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called
Session of the 40th legislature of the State of Twins, known and shown as
Article 1105 -b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended,
there shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective,
parcels of property abutting upon said portion of said streets, and against
the real and true owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners
be named or correctly named herein or not, the several sumo of money herein -
below mentioned and itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels
of said property, the number of front feet of each and the several amounts
assessed against same and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and the
names of the apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted by said
City Council, being as follows, to-wit:
FINAL. PAVING ASSESSMENT
OLD ROBSTOWN R90 from AGNES STREET TO UPRIVER, ROAD
Pavement_ 8" Caliche Base, 2" Hot Asphaltic Surface tr Dellinger, T Contractor
Contract Date- 40 feet face of curb to £ara of mtrh Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot 1.55 None Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost ner sa. foot 0.42 1.68 Sidewalk rate per front foot
Property Owner
Name of Addition
Block
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft
Sidewalk
Cost
Curb&G.tt.
Lin. Ft
Curb &
Gutter Cost
Total
Amount
Tex -Mex R. R. (W)
E. Franklin F1ato,Jr. (W)
J.C.Russel Farm Bli
"
19
19
100
14709
84
147.9
141.12
248.47
46
147.9
71.30
229.25
212.42
477.72
R U S
S E L L
D R I V
19
2
43.58
42907
Guaranty Title & Trust (W)'
E. S. Price (W)
"
Glen Royal
20
43.58
42.07
73.21
70.68
43.58
42.07
67.55
65.21
140.76
135.89
V I C
T O R Y
D R I V
3
3
71.51
68.64
R. A. Johnson (W)
R. M. Brown (W)
"
"
18
1
71.51
68.64
120.14
].15032
71.51
68964
110084
106039
230.98
221071
L I B
E R T Y
D R I V
99.84
0. E. Cartwright (W)
"
1
1
99.84
167.73
99.84
154.75
322.48
S. S A
X E T
D R I V
140
214.97
Emil Krejci (W)
Durward A. Stephens (W)
&dl Krejci Tract
"
140
214.97
235.20
361,15
140
214.97
217.00
333.20
452.20
694035
K R
E J C I
LANE
196.68
105.9
Ray Peterson (W)
John Kolloja (W)
5axet Hts. #2
"
1
1
8
1
196.68
105.9
330.42
177.91
127
105.9
196.85
164015
527.27
342.06
S 0
B E Y D
R I V E
1
N. E. Narveson (W)
"
2
131.19
22040
131x19
203634
423.74
Hal M. Smithers (W)
'!
2
28
133.21
133.21
223.79
133.21
206048
430.27
Public Works Dept., Corpus Christi,'Texas
Enaineerina Division Compiled S.N.D. Checked H.H.S.
`x
•�rwu�gya r +t?,�. 1- ,,.'•�" ;.^- -+ r-.:.X€+- :rn • - r•r .-. >. -- .,,. ; , yr r?�-
3,: k FINAL,- PAVING ASSESSMENT;
"^ Y OLD RbBST039N RpAD' from =AON&3 STREB "'TO'Uf3tIVII% ROAD
Pavement``{ �Aw calicos Bass; 2 "` Hot Asphaltic Surfac ®• - J. M:- *'DaMngeri'Ina: Contractor
ContractSDate "' "` m LO ft~ •face' of curb - .,to, face` of curb Ft.'RoaSwag
Ciirli cost perlineahfoot= ` "` T:55: Nons''_ '�' Paviiig rate per front foot
Sid"e"walk cos t +'per)sq foot ."''0- 42,< Td68 Sidewalk rate per ,front foot '
Property,:Owue_r., ; *p i ",i '• `Name of,Addition,� , - Block • Lot _Property ' - ,Paving *' 'Sidevialk " ` Sidewalk Curb&
1J ,,ept;�iE�l:orpLls:;l:nnsn;:it ease ,
�"�"
`ZTwnber
o...'Number ''
'Fruatage
Cost
' Lia.-,Ft '
• Cost.
Gutter
Lin: <Ft -
• Cuib &
Gnttet Cost
, Total•'
. Amount,
; x:a''• "°
.'B','A,R'
TEL :X T: T'
'D,R.I3
Py°'
„, s• ,:4
4 - ;•(W)zr
i Hts,:: 2 °'..'•
8• .
1,
'156ri3?
;':
156:32
262162 --
°156.32
242x30•
"504.921
Evangeline; Garsa ` #'
aldwin',,3; Aore%2f:0
Ti.-'4 & 5,
210
;2101
352.80'
2)0.
325:50'
.678130•
Elisabeth
r'
k
a tt `
,31;
TTT rrr
„,.
11
1
1T660.48,0y
1 05
162:7!-
•M.'
3 9 '- 1
L F
riS (W)
A1[•Prd:a' as
si.
•}Dna',3,too�',r
y, ".4 " "" w ',
;' ;
'-
Pict 2-
105:
lo5,,
176.48
•105',
162:5
"339.15.,
t• ole� nm '
l, rc C'o^ : w )
g,-
acc�
. 5 .', '
291n'i'„
_
14-56
73640
;3-
290.96
'•a
+r
,
2;g1!2 { 7.18
3' 2
2s0361
31rTOTALS, 56
7 :>
,oa`i3g;._Pt,i�p
°
� +f,( :t' `
• • ' fr., 4
'� fi, b< ,
� '}
•-f '
�
°
!
vty
':`tr' ° i�.'"t +�,
-
,
, `5
S5b ,
;r
+ -ia `< � r
�
,`het �.' i,
-
�5ryt.;4°
,
M1
,
� .^
(
r
} �
-
-
�
•.
.
� J
'ft.. .. g#t{4i >' t i •fit `
-
-
"+p'
- -
_
1J ,,ept;�iE�l:orpLls:;l:nnsn;:it ease ,
;; F'�"•Pi� ,�.,�. k;S�z - rt.n .P -- ... '� _- _�_ -�- .. -,., -- H,,.w a„m�.�.�wrrr,,., .:3.e,uw r..°+r*s , =, 1xa- .,T --r.J�
FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT PAGE' 3
OLD ROBSTOWN RQAD from AGNES STREET TO UPRIVER ROAD
Pavement_ 8" Caliche Base, 2" Hot Asphaltic Surface 'J M Dellin=% Jr. Contractor
Contract Ddte )40 ft- fa -p of curb to face of curb Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot 1.55 None Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot 0.42 1.68 Sidewalk rate per front foot
Property Owner
Name of Addition
B]oek
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewallt
Cost
Curb&Gutter
Lin. Ft.
Curb &
Gutter Cost
Tot.]
Amount
Tea -Yes R. R. (E)
Hillorest 1 Ac.Tracbs
100
84
7141.12
46
71.30
212.42
,jam - ,VlelhL �eR (E)
13
102.9
102#9
172087
102.9
159.50
332.37
0. E. Miller (E)
"
12 & 11
222.58
222.58
373.93
222.58
345.00
718.93
J. W. Johnson (E)
"
10
69.34
69#34
116.49
69034
107.48
223.97
N. T. Pulliam (E)
it
8 & 9
151.41
151.41
254.37
15141
234.69
489.06
H. C. Starnes (E)
"
7 & Part
of 6
95.20
95.20
159.94
95.20
147.56
307.50
Nora & H.C. Griffin (E)
"
Part of6
79.99
79.99
134.38
79.99
123.98
258.36
G.E.,,H.R.& Ethel Nsylor(E)
"
5
101,
101
169668
101
156.55
326.23
J. M. Nogueria (E)
"
4
114.74
114.74
192.76
114672k
177.85
370.61
Eva N. Guererro (E)
"
3
136.29
1$6.29
228.97
136.29
211.25
440.22
Roger Q. Mills (E)
"
2 B
150
150
252.00
150
232.50
484.5
N 0. N
A Y L C
R C I R
L E
5
G.E., H.R.& Ethel Naylor(E)
"
1 & 2A
273-93
273.93
460.33
27303
424.59
884.79
" It " " (E)-
Snodgrasb 30 -Acre Tract
20
20
33.60'
20
31.00
64.60
G. E. Naylor (E)
Bluebonnet Court
A
1
77.66
77.66
130.47
77.66
120.37
250.84
J. B. Goode (E)
"
A
2
77.66
77.66
130.47
77.66
120#37
250.84
B L U E
B 0 N
E T D R
I V E
77.66
C. T. Huffman (E)
"
B
2
77.66,
130-47
77.66
120637
250.84
ii- B.- Mead" C -d�r We'9"z'A(E)
n
B
1
77.66
77.66
130.47
77.66
120.37
250684
C.C. Ind.Sohool Dist. (E)
"
401.76
674.96
401.76
622#73
1297.69
K E
N W O D
D R I
V E
rR Dir-M
. (E)
Hilltop Terrace
1
1
127
60
100.80
100.80
W. C. Stanford (E)
"
1
2
60
57
95.76
95.76
R. G. Stawn (E)
'!
1
3
60
57
95.76
95.76
Public Works Dept., Corpus Christi, Texas
FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT
OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD from AGNES STREET TO UPRIVER MAD
PAGE 4
Pavement 8" Caliche Base, 2" Hot Asphaltic Sur£are T M_ .De11ingPr, Tna. Contractor
Contract Date X$0 £t.. Fare cf Cori] -to face of Cnr-b Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot_ 1.55 Nona Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot o.42 1.68 Sidewalk rate per front foot
Property Owner
Name of Addition
Block
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
Cost
Curb&Gutts,
Lin. Ft.
Curb &
Gutter Cost
Total
Amount
J. T. Messer (E)
Hilltop Terrace
1
4
60
60
100.80
100680
D. D. Berry (E)
"
1
5
60
48
80.64
80.64
A. B. Priour 1,68 (E)
!'
1
6
60
57
95.76
95.76
R. it. -T 1rnerM X& (E)
"
1
7
60
78&96
LvF6,r /Furry
it. V. .• (E)
n
1
8
60
57
95.76
C. E. Stockton (E)
1
9
45
35
58.80
58.80
W. A. Thomas (E)
'!
2
1
50
62
104.16
104.16
H. A. Gibson (E)
"
2
2
60
56
94.08
94.08
E. E. & M. P. Elkins (E)
"
2
3
74.42
74.42
125&03
125.03
J. L. Shelton (E)
L. A. Barnett's Su td.
2
1
113.9
113.9
19105 _
113.9
176.55
367.90
C O L
O N I A L
C 0 U R
T
1
113.9
Mrs. G. W. Green (E)
"
1
113.9
191.35
11369
176.55
367.90
*-.-gefas tua.TIX C, N11"T" (E)
Barr- Keeler Subd.
Part of 6
50
50
84.00
50
77.50
161.50
Morris Liedeker (E)
"
Part of 6
100
100
168000
100
155.00
323.00
Mrs, Bertha Liedeker (E)
"
Part of 6
1.50
150
252.00
150
232.50
484.50
M. Liedeker (E)
!'
Part of 6
52.9
52.9
88.87
52.9
82.00
170.87
Humble Oil & Rig. Co. (E)
"
Part of 6
100
36
60.48
29
4+.95
105.43
TOTAL EAST SIDE
3,600.9
6,o49.53
2,885.4
4,472
51
TOTAL WEST SIDE
2,147 .8
608.32
2 036.1
3.156.01
PROPERTY OYWRS T
DTAL
P748-71
9, 7a 65
4,021*61
7,628o52
17,28E
COST TO CITY OF CORPUS Cffa
TI AS PROPERTY Oft'
None
Cost to all other Property Cwners
$
17,286.37
Amount to be Paid by Nueces
County
30,000„00
Total Cost to City of Corpus
Christi for Paving
and Drainage
36,210.23
83,496.60
Total Cost of Project
0
Public Works Dept., Corpus Christi, Texas
Engineering Division Compiled S.N.D. Checked H.H.S.
ms's kit dA7 PAVING ASSESSMENT
Pavement °3" C41iRh* Ms P# Hot AfiDN"lo furaqe
Contractor
Contract Date ?af3 i %. Yace of tab tr f� op curb Ft.. Roadway
Curb coat per lineal foot - �oz�
Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk coat per sq. foot _ 0 s y
istl _ R;rl -lb . , _ r___
Property Owner
I Name of Addition
ot
mber
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk Sidewalk
Lin. Ft Cost
CurbGGutte
Curb & Y Total `
9- F
3. Franklin ll Saiat7r. fK?
*
a�a a.zx
Lin. Ft
46
Gutter Cos Amount
72.30 212.11:
1117.9
3217.9 240.47
147.9
229.25 477.7
f L
Tk
._
1rf32't+grsutp
s itie 1'rurt }
43.58
43.5
$. 1�ft+iC6 �)
Dlan ltoyai
0
112.07
73.21
112.07 70.68
43.
67.55 1tr0.1,
42.
55.21 135.(j
r
lr€_
_
hnson �w)
a
`
a
71.5%
71. 120.111
71.
110.84 230.94
3 1
68.64
68. 115.32
6 t.
136.3 221.71
_
iii 7IRT7
l7�lISZi
_
_
. G. tZarteerip�ht (x3
"
x I
59,E
'99. 147.73
99.
15675 32x,48
. ftre3c3 (l*)
7:11,17. Krajscl 'lkaat
sG.:: i4 =dfZ2
l�l •."
remard I. Stapftne (N)
b
214.97
140 235.20
Iii
217. 452.20
234.7 361.15
214.9
333. 694.35
a sacx
_
hAti9
W Faterma ()
>ten Ko3loja (fip
Saxat Uto. 112
"
I B
396.66
799 6. 330,42
127
256 .8 527.27
1• 1
105.9
105.9 177.91
.1D5.9
164. 342.06
S;
i�.a�rsacas rip
W
2 1
LI 3t. Fatthara Epp
e
2 28
133.21
132.1 220 -40
131.
203.3, 42,3.74
133.2 223.79
133.2.
206.4 430.27
wlic Works Dept., Corpus Christi.
Tex..
W
t_r �csq PAVING ASSESSMENT
from as 101=42 P
Pavement `:$e a3SCY Y Riga 2C* SlD$ U' a� g��!- _ Contractor -.
Contract Date f S cirs bj!'=rb to f�rro- rpP i Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot r
Paving, rate pei -front foot,
_ „_ ___� _ a� a _. -u• > re Sidewalk rate per fiont foot
Pro a _Owner -�
p rtY
Name of Addition
Block r
_Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
Cost
C.rIi&Gutter
Lin. FL
Curb &;
Gutter Cos
- Amount
-230
3 X5:32
`s < 262.60_ '
:,:3
2i�2:E1
-
i4 t,,4-
.
�t�5,'_
CGS'..:
Tb:fzt-
`,j1fa$.:
�d.75:39�i5.=
A. ;U
;3
i�s� $
3t
�,
-`.-
? i:. 4
g7�}G,40.
30
=�a,67,cZ4
f
'li 'LPCTf' "Gyt C
alw:
.s,rj,
-�i- ""•
>YVF
��. +(•
,y
$
2,ki ?��
.9,i60�!32gC+,w
3�16�•
1 y
wiit;p*,orks Dept., ` Corpus Christi, Texas
Com fl -
e
p d Checked'
E z1ing. Division, a � �
PRI&T TIVI OaRY PAVING ASSESSMENT
£ 41931 i AF3 from tgXx M X7141 r' !W ttNiirn 'jogr3
Pavement $° Caliahe Dam, 20 Eot Avnhatle Surraee S t9_ 'a14jy�p Imam Contractor
Contract Date 1. %t ft- fy-'f. n?r rt:ris to rare of osrb Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot 1.55 tam.. Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot O.h2 _1„ 5a Sidewalk rate per front foot,
' Property Owner
Name of Addition
Blok
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
Cost
Curb &Gutter
Lin. FL
Curb &
Gutter Cost
Total
Amount
Tax-5" R. a. (9)
aincrast, Uc.Traai
100
64
]};;1.012
46
710
212.4g1
�n1 aL, S.IUI,('�)
°
13
102.9
3:02.9.
172.67
142.9
159.
ANl11� Sae alra/+v (S)
a
12 & 11
222.54
222.53
37393
222.5
345-M
715 4;
a. W. Jobwo n (4)
°
10
69.3h,
6%34
116.49
69.
107.68
223..7
cf.. T..Pani m W-
°
. -
8 & 9
151.b1
251.311
- 2541.37
15141
23h.69
489.0
is. 0. Starnes - (z)
7 & ldrt
of 6
95.20
'95.20
•1519.94
95•
147.56
307.9
Nora . C. 3rifrit2 (S)
°
Part of 6
- D.1t°i
79.99
136.38
79-99
123.923.
250.34
6.2-'E3. LA 8thal
5
1611
WL,
269.68
3U
- 1.56.55
326.2;
J. if. Nogaeria - (is)
v
h
114.78
UL-74
`192.76
2.213:7
12.7.85
370.6:
Yra H. 0aararro, (ti)
"
3
136.29
136.29
223.97
136.29
211.25
440.2,'
!?agar %. MU.1a lS)
u
2 B
150
154
252.00
1503
2,32.53
1065€
fi. L'AIL0A
CIkVLB
O.2.,R.R.6 Stbal tisylar(s)
"
i 2 A
273.93
273.93
460.33
273.9
424.59
M.71,
of ° 9 (i')
Snodgrass 3G -Acre I
r*Ot
2D
20
33.60
20
31.00
64.64
G. &..Saylor (a)
nine'- bounat Court
A
1
77.65
77.66
131.47
77.
M-37
254.61
J. B. Sogft (g)
"
A
2gg
'7y7�..66
77.66
.3330.47
77.
12J.37
250.61
4
hh
v 4 Fi U W
11 L f
y y
r; a IV .
J
C. T. ,#rtfIgban GIB WEA��� W
( &)
°
B
2
1
77.66
77.661
77.66
77.66
130.b7
130.47
77.
7-7.66
323.3?
123.37
250.61
250.61
C. C. and, Schaal fiat.(zs)
°
400.76
674.96
401.76
622.73
1x297.65
j,(� �ttrwt
Yrtw"
pit iI7
W.-A-ftatte,tr& J.13.1'aaks(S
11tc� 3srr #wa
1
k
127
121
213.36
213.3!
0. C. Stanford . (w)
"
1
2
60
57
95-76
95-74
R. 0. Stay (3)
1
3
ir0 .
57
95.6
95.7E
Works Dept., Corpus Christi, Texas
engineering Division Compiled Checked
PRELD MARY PAVING ASSESSMENT
•:7
OLD 200iTou on from Aufil�u' !bi' KBT TO tlPUVM UJUD
Pavement 8° Caliebe 'Base, 2" Pot Asphaltic - Surtatsr J. X. Dalin&or. 1m. Contractor
Contract Date 10 2t. face of sorb to face of curb Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot l•55 Now Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot O.1 2 1.68 Sidewalk rate per front foot
Property Owner
Name of Addition
Block
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
Cost
C.,6&&Gut ,
Lin. Ft.
Curb &
Gutter Cost
Total
Aroonut
J. T. 'Iragear (91)
wintop Terra"
1
h
60
60
200.80
U0.81
D. D BM7 (9)
1
5
60
he
80.64
WAS
. D. vriow (�
1
6
60
57
95.76
93.74
rtR K 0. q. ee=
1
7
60
47
78.96
713.91
V. u,F.GR1, FITU)
"
1
8
60
57
95.76
95.74
c. 1. stadkton (z
1
9
bS
)5
58.619
58.8N
D. A. Thnaas (E
"
2
I
50
62
1114.16
-
la-1
R. A. Oibson 0E
®
2
2
60
56
9h.08
-94,0i
Z. s..& V. I. Elkins (1%
"
2
3
7h.te2
74.42
125.03
125.4:
J. L. Sbeltoa W
.L.A.Barnattaa Subd
2
1
113.9
113.9
191.35
10.9
176.55
367.54
C 0
01 1 t
C t93i
it T
Mrs. 0. V.
UJFlI.n'& }
barr•�sabsr Subd.
1
1
6
11+,3.9
113.9
11911.35
113.9
176.55
367.91
t�CC,fsi- i�.RTN
of
SC3
50
64.00
0
77.50
161-9
pia Lwow (�
Part of 6
2t9Q-
lW
1"-00
IW
155.00
M-0
X". Bertha biadraker (k)
hart of 6
1S0
150
252.130
1517
232.30
484.51
M. Liedeterr (W
r,
Part of b
52.9
52.9
88.87
52.9
82.00
170.0
Unable tail. & Rtg.Co. (E)
"
Fart or 6
1419
36
60.48
29
441.95
305.4:
YOM UST Sim
3,66'7.9
8,152.09
2,885.44
4,472.
TOTAL an ::D3$
2 2h1.
608.2
2.036.13
1
R@X71 04isas T
Tal`+
)2 17,31
5, a15 - T
L9 x770. W
,721.
7, 2 .
con To CITY V CliaCp i
C?ssS"t,str &S z"ftfip:�
o"�
N'W
Coat to all other Pr
rtJ Ems
7x398.93
AMourt to be Paid by
Opuntj
30,000.00
total Cott to Guy of
Christi for `aving
39,139.78
wd bra Map
Total Coat of Pro3sct
a 3 •7l
Public Works Dept., Corpus Christi, Texas s J
%Engieeriug•tDivision• _ Compiled Checked
8.9;
PAVING ASSESSMENT
", >^<
from
Ron
Contractor
.'Pavertient 8P t`, aa7ic ?Ea'`fHn#.�i,st+t.�'SnrPae��
;;. - •..
' Ft,. Roadwap,,„
;
Contraat Date` °
4 ,r-
Y }
Paving, rate per.fro nt foot
;:Cuzb co's# per lneal;foot "'" A.,
Sidewalk' ate per•front foot
-Side costpez s'q:,foot ` �0: +
- - -
'
Flack Lot
Property
Paving'.
Sidewalk
'Lin.
Sidewalk
Cost
Curb&Gutter Curb & 'Total
Lin, Ft Gutter Coat Amount
-
_
^- Property Owner -
Name of Addition "Num'ber
Number
Frontage
Cost
Ft
_ A T 8. R. (W) `
'i;lManis7inFlmto,Jr..
d G:Rdbael l+arn •B1
"
19
100.
147#9
�'
84;
747.9
141.12.
248.47 •.
46 ?1.30 , 47.7 1t2,
147.9 .229.25 47772
(W)
79
_
kUS8E,LL
DRIV
2lworarity'.iYtle 8r.Tritiit',SSW
a
8
43:58
'`x
'43x58
42x07
' 73:21
70:68
43.58 '67.'55 146.76
65.21 335.89
Glen Royal-
20
4207
.42.07
'
V 1. C T 07E Y
D -R I V
`
(W)
3 18 =
'!x.51
Ti 51
12o.14
71.51 110.84 230.98
R , A. ,Johnson
;'(W)'
a'
3, 1
68,64-
.
68:664
115,32
68.64. 106~39 22471
R. li,' Brown
,
B13 R'T Y
- -D 8 -I V.
C: E. Cartwright' (� }'
"
1 1.,
99 84
99:84
76 7.73
99,84 ]S4:T5 322.48
•
S:.6:,A X. is T
R' I v
-
_
Are of - -' ,(W)•
lirejo3 fact
m
21697•
140:
'234«'97 '
235.20,
'361Y15
140 217 «DO' - 452;20
214.97 33320' ',694:x5
Hir Peteibon' %.` (W) -
`:
aaet �li"'02
I° .F $
196.68
196.68"
;330.42
177,91-
127 196:85::527:27,
105.9 166i5. 342:x6
John KolTOja
1 1
105.9
105:9"
'St)HSY
D IVS
g..'.= A.•.Ii�r +i$argei+on; �)
s
_
2 1
131419
133.21
220,100
223479
131.19 203.34 423.74
733.21 206#48 '430:27
`: Hal:1�. = ;5a3t1»� (A)
'
2 28
133.21
<P.ublic,,Workb P§Pt -,4 Corpus Christi, Texae
Compiled
�
Checked_46&8= "
PADS 2
FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT
OLD ROBSTONN RDAD from AGNES STREET TO UPRIVER ROAD
Pavement 8" Caliche Base, 2" Hot Asphaltic Surface J. M. Dellinger, Inc. • Contracto
Contract Date 40 ft~ face of curb to face of curb Ft.. Roadwa;
Curb cost per lineal foot 1.55 None Paving rate per front foc
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot 0 +42 1.68 Sidewalk rate per front foc
Property Owner
Name of Addition
Block
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
Cost
Curb &Gutter
Lin. Ft.
Curb &
Gutter Cost
Total
Amount
B A R
T L E T T
DRI
r E
J dr VPHNSON
(W)
Uxet Hts. #2
8
1
156.32
156.32
262.62
156.32
242.30
504.92
Evangeline Garza (W)
Baldwin 3 Acre Tr.
Tr. 4 & 5
210
210
352.80
210
325.50
678 «30
M. Elisabeth Marion (W)
"
Tract 3
105
105
176040
105
162.75
339.15
A. Dorsogna (W)
"
Tract 2
105
105
176.40
105
162.75
339.15
Magnolia Petroleum Co. (W)
"
Tract 1
171.55
92
154.56
88 '
136.40
290,96
TOTALS
2,147.8
3,608.32
2,036.1
3,156.
31
Public Works Dept., Corpus Christi, Texas
Engineering Division Compiled S.N.D. Checked H.H.S.
FINAL,
OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD
PAVING ASSESSMENT PAGE 3
from AGNES STREET TO UPRIVER ROAD
Pavement 8" Cali.che Base. 2" Hot Asphaltio Surface J. M..Dellinger, Jrs Contractor
Contract Date 40 ft. face of curb to face of curb Ft.. Roadway
Curb cost per lineal foot 1.55 None Paving rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot 0.42 1.68 Sidewalk rate per front foot
Pro Owner
PAY
Name of Addition
Block
Number
Lot
Number
Property
Frontage
Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
Cost
Curb &Gutter
Lin. Ft.
Curb &
Getter Cast
Total
Amount
ex- x
Hillorest 1 Ac.Trao
s
100
84
7 .12
46
71.30
212.42
u'. o Jabnesnt4oi5.
73
102.9
102.9
17207
102.9
15960
332.37
;. E. Miller g� °r��@(E)
"
12 & 11
222.58
222.58
373:93
222.58
345.00
718 +93
J. W. Johnson (E)
"
10
69.34
69.34
116.49
69.34
107.48
223.97
H. T. Pulliam (E)
"
8 & 9
151 #41
151.41
254.37
151.41
234.69
489+06
H. C. Starnes (E)
"
7 & Part
of 6
95.20
95.20
159.94
95.20
147.56
307x50
Nora & H.C. Griffin (E)
"
Part of6
79.99
79.99
134.38
79.99
123:98
258.36
G.E.,H.R.& Ethel Naylor(E)
"
5
101
101
169.68
101
156.55
326023
J. M. Nogueria (E)
"
4
114.74
114.74
192.76
114.74
177.85.
370.61
Eva N. Guererro (E)
"
3
136.29
186.29
228.97
136.29
211.25
440.22
Roger Q. Mills (E)
"
2 B
150
150
252.00
150
232.50
484.50
NO.
A Y L O
R C I R
L E
273.93
G.E., H.R.& Ethel Naylor(E)
"
1 & 2A
273.93
460.33
273.93
424.59
884.79
" " " " (E)
SnodgrasS 30 -Aare
act
20
20
33.60
20
31.00
64.60
G. E. Naylor (E)
Bluebonnat Court
A
1
77.66
77.66
130047
77#66
120.37
250.84
J. B. Goode (E)
"
A
2
77.66
77.66
130.47
77.66
12007
250.84
B L U 4
B O N N.1
E T D R
I V E
77.66
C. T. Huffman (E)
"
B
2
77:66
130 #47
77.66
120.37
250.84
b. B:- �6esda�G'r'��= G�rA�cE)
"
B
1
77.66
77.66
130.47
77.66
120.37
250.84
C.C. Ind.School Dist. (E)
"
401.76
674-96
401.76
622.73
297.69
K
I W0D
D R I A
E
7-, R, D
(E)
lilltop Terrace
1
1
127
60
100.80
100.80
W. C. Stanford (E)
"
1
2
60
57
95,,76
95.76
R, G. Stawn (E)
"
1
3
60
57
95.76
95.76
Public Works Dept., Corpus Chnsn, 7 "exas r .
N
.
SD H.H.S,,
Division
F.,rmnnorinrr Compiled Checked
N d
PAGE, 4
FIRM
PAVING ASSESSMENT
,ol,D. ROBSTQ ID"
from
Arms 5
Contractor
x ' Paveiuent 8"' Caliche B40A: 2" °Hot Asphaltic 3,tdWe
T_ IL M Tinger
Ft.. Roadway
Contract Date
Paving rate per front foot
' Curb cost per lineal foot 1+55
c
Sidewalk rate per front foot
Sidewalk cost per sq. foot' 0+ 2
Lot
Pm Paving
Cost
Sidewalk
'Lin. Ft
Sidewalk Curb &Gutter Cmb & Total
Cost Lin. Ft Gutter Cost Amount
Block
Property Owner - - Name of Addition .Number
Number
Fmnmmg
J. T. Messer', (S) Hilltop• Terrace`
1
4
5
60
60:
60
48:-
100 *80
80.64
100a64
80:64
D; D:•Berry (B) "
1
6
60
57•
95x76
95076
A: B:- Priour (E)
1
7
60
47
57
78.96
95076
75' 6
95 :76
!aF �eifF {r "
"
y
8
9
60
45
35
5 eo
B+
5ty� 80
'
C:::Stooktea (E)
i`'
2
1
5 0.
62K
104:76
' ' ;104:16
;(E)
H. -A. Gibega'.:`_' . " .-' :'( &) n
'
2..
.. 2
60'
74 42
S6'"
7Lii42
94x08
325003
"= 94 "`0,08
�'.. 125603
- 2
E: 73: &'M: P,'. Ell i'i (B)
L. A. Barns 'a S ' 2
3.
1
113':9
77.0
797.:35
113.9
776655 367:90
J: ;I;. Shelton ()
.
COLONIAL
CO'.0 T-
.
"
1
1
113..9
113.9,
191035
113x9
176.55 367:90
Mrs. G. V. Green. ;•. 4 &)
A. Cofae (} Barr -diee7.er Subdv '
='
Part of 6•
Part 6
50
'100
50
loo.,
84.00
168,100,
50'
3DO�
77.50 167x50
155«66 - 323 *00
"
Morris ;Li®deker._' (B) "
'(B}
•OP
Part of 6
150
.
'150'
252x00
150 '
232;50• 484:50
'370>87"
Mrs. Bertha Liddeker %
(�) "
Part .of 6
52.9
52.9
88:67
52?9
82:00
Liedekrr'
"
Part of ,6
'IOW
36
60:48 -
29,
42#95, 105.43 -
Rumble Oil & afg: Co.. (H)
TOTAL BAST SIDB
3AM-9 6io49.53' 2=885: -
2 ]137.8 r 6OBs 2 2 0 6.
4,472
1 01- .b
TOTAL SST SIDd�.
i7• 9`� ?0
�92]a,
7i .2_ 21?
PROPERTr 77r S T
AL
.h7
266037
COST "TO -CITY"' CORPUS CIS AS PB7 PE
None
'rGost to- all,b£ her' Pm party re
$ 170286:37
Aaoutrt io h®rPaid by Biaecee onnV
30aOD0000
Cost to "City of Corps Christi for Paving
„Total
and Drainage
36,210.23
Total Cost cf''Pro ject
$ 83.2196.60"
Compiled
S N I3:
Checked •TIA Se i
! Public Works Dept.,- Corpus Christi, Texas
4 Engineering Division ",
SECTION 4. DE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That in the event the actual
frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion
of said improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet herein -
above stated, the assessments herein made against any such property and against
the real and true owner or owners thereof shall be, and the same are hereby
declared, to be increased or decreased, as the case may be, in the proportion
which said excess or deficiency of frontage shall bear to the whole number of
front feet of property actually improved in accordance with the front foot rate
of assessment herein adopted, it being the intention that each parcel of
property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, abutting upon Old
Robstown Road, within the limits above defined, shall pay for said improvements
under the "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PI.ANII, which rule or plan is hereby found and
determined to be just and equitable and to produce a substantial equality,
having in view the spacial benefits to be received and the burdens imposed
thereby; and it is further ordained that upon final completion and acceptance
of said improvements on Old Robstown Road all certificates hereinafter provided
for, issued to evidence said assessments against said parcels of property abutting
upon Old Robstown Road, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall
be issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual frontage of said
property and the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said
certificate in no case to exceed the amount herein assessed against such
property unless such increase be caused by an mesa of front footage over the
amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost and such actual number of front
feet, if different from that hereinabove shown in Section 3 hereof, to be
determined by the Director of Public Works upon completion of said work on
Old Robstown Road, and the finding of said Director of Public Works shall be
final and binding upon all parties concerned. `
SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in section 3 hereof
assessed against said parcels of property abutting on Old Robstown Road, and
the real and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or correctly named
herein or not, subject to the provisions of Section 4 hereof, together with
interest thereon at the rate of rive per cent (5 %) per annIDa with reasonable
attorneyws fees and all costs and expehse of collection, if incurred, are
hereby declared to be and made a first and prior lien upon the respective
parcels of property, against which same are assessed from and after the date
said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit: November 14, 1950,
and a personal liability and charge against the real and true owner or owners
thereof, whether or not such owner or ewnera be named or correctly named herein,
and that said lien shill be and constitute the first and prior enforcible claim
against the property assessed and shall be a first and paramount lien superior
to all other liens, claims or titles, except for ]awful ad valorem taxes; and
that the am so aeaessed shall be payable as follows, to-writ: in five (5)
equal annual installments, the first of which will be payable on or before
twenty (20) days after the completion of said improvements in the street upon
which the respective property abuts, and acceptance thereof by the said City
Council, the four (4) remaining installments to be due and payable, respectively,
one (1), two (2), three (3) and four (4) years from and after said date of
acceptance, deferred payments to bear interest from said date of acceptance at
the rate of five per cent (5%) per annum, payable annually concurrently with
each of said installments; past due installments of principal and interest to
bear interest at the same rate per annum until paid; provided, however, that
any owner of such property shall have the right to pay off the entire amount
of wq such assessment, or any installment thereof, before maturity by paying
principal and accrued interest to date of said payment; and provided, further,
that if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or
interest when due, then the entire amount of said assessment upon which such
default is made, shall, at the option of J. M. Dellinger, Inc., or its assigns,
be, and become immediately due and payable and shall be collectible, together
with reasonable attorney's fees and all costs and expenses of collection if
incurred. "
SECTION 6. That the City of Corpus Christi shall not in any manner be
liable for the payment of any ethos hereby validly assessed against any abutting
property, and'the real and true owner or owners thereof, but J. M. Dellinger,
Inc., shall look solely to such property, and the real and true owner or owners
thereof, for the payment of the sums validly assessed against said respective
parcels of property, but said City shall be obligated to furnish J. M. Dellinger,
Inc., valid assessments and assessment certificates and shall exercise all of
its ]awful powers and aid in the enforcement and collection of said liens and
assessments; and if default shall be made in the payment of any of said same
herein assessed against the said parcels of property, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, collection thereof shall be enforced, at the option
of said J. M. Dellinger, Inc., or its assigns, either by suit in any court
having jurisdiction or by sale of the property assessed as nearly as possible
in the manner as may be provided by law and charter in force in said City for
the sale of property for the collection of ad valorem taxes.
SECTION 7. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments, the
liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels of
property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and the time and terms
of payment, and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable certificates
shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to J. M. Dellinger, Inc.,
upon the completion of said improvements on said street and acceptance thereof
by said City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the Mayor in the
name of the City, "attested by the City Secretary with the corporate seal of
said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts of said assessments
and times and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon, the date of the
completion and acceptance of the improvements for which the certificate is
issued, and shall contain the name of the apparent true owner or owners as
accurately as possible, and the description of the property assessed by lot
and block number, or front foot thereof, or such other description as may
otherwise identify the same, and if the said property shall be owned by an
estate or firm, then to so state the fact shall be sufficient, and no error or
mistake in describing any such property or in giving the name of any owner or
owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise invalidate or impair the assessment
levied hereby or the certificate issued in evidence thereof.
That the said certificates shall further provide substantially that
if default shall be made in the payment of arq installment of principal or
interest when due, then at the option of J. M. Dellinger, Inc., or its assigns,
or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidenced thereby shall at
once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with reasonable attorney 's
fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and said certificate
-hall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the real and true owner
or owners of such property, whether named or correctly named therein or not,
and the lien upon such property, and that said lien is first and paramount
thereon, superior to all other liens, titles and charges, except for lawful
ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said improvements were ordered by
said City Council, to -wit, November 14, 1950, and shall provide in effect that
if default shall be made in the payment thereof, the same may be enforced, at
the option of J. M. Dellinger, Inc., or its assigns, by the sale of the property
therein described in the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes
as above recited, or ty suit in any court having jurisdiction.
That said certificate shall further recite in effect that all the
proceedings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly
had in compliance with the law and charter in force in said City and the pro-
ceedings of the City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites to the
fixing of the assessment lien against the property therein described, or
attempted to be described, and the personal liability of the real and true
owner or owners thereof, evidenced by such certificates, have been regularly
done and performed, which recitals shall be ewd dence of all the matters and
facts ao recited and.no further proof thereof shall be required in any court.
That the said certificates nay have coupons attached thereto in
evidence of each or any of the several installments thereof, which may be
signed with the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Secretary.
That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, when re-
quested so to do by the holder of said certificates, to aid in the enforcement
and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain other and further
recitals pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall not be necessary that
said certificates shall be in the exact form as above set forth, but the sub-
stance and effect thereof shall suffice.
SECTION 6. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability
and charge against the real and true owner or owners'mf the property described,
or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not be
named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the name of the property
owner, or the description of any property or the amount of any assessment, or
in any other matter or thing shall not in anywise invalidate or impair any
assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued, and such mistake, or error,
invalidity or irregularity whether in such assessment or in the certificate
issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not required to be, to be enforcible,
corrected at any time by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
Further, that the omission of said improvements in front of any particular
parcel of property abutting upon Old Robstown Road, which is exempt from the
lien of said assessment, shall in nowise affect or impair the validity of
assessments against the other parcels of property abutting upon said street;;
and that the total amounts assessed against the respective parcels of property
abutting upon said street, within the limits herein defined, and the real and
true owner or owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the estimates of
said assessments prepared by the Director of Public iiorks and approved and
adopted by said City Council and are in accordance with the proceedings of the
said City Council relative to said improvements and assessments therefor, and
with the terms, powers and provisions of said Chapter 106 of the Acts of the
First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texis, known as
Article 1105 -b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas and the Charter
of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under which terms, powers and provisions
said proceedings, said improvements and assessments were had and made by said
City Council.
SECTION 9. The fact that there is badly needed at this time
permanent street improvements on Old Robstown Road within the limits herein -
before defined, and the further fact that the present condition of said portion
of Old•Robstown Road is dangerous to the health and public welfare of the
inhabitants of the City of Corpus Christi, due to the conditions and increase
of traffic along said portion of said street creates a public emergency and
public imperative necessity requiring the suspension of the Charter Rule
that no ordinance or resolution shall be passed finally on the date it is
introduced and that such ordinance or resolution shall be read at three
several meetings of the City Council, and the Mayor having declared that
such public emergency and imperative necessity exist, and having requested
that such Charter Rule be suspended, and that this ordinance be passed finally
on the date of its introduction and take effect and be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, IT IS ACC(R=GLY SO ORDAINED.
PASSED AND APPROVED this /% day of December, A. D. 1950. .
_ai QAAU.4
MAYOR
City of Corpus Christi, Teo:as
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO IDEAL FORM:
i
City Attorney
Corpus Christi, Texas
December /2—, 1950
TO THE M MBEIS OF THE CITY CCONCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
Gentlemen:
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the fore-
going ordinance, a public urgency and imperative necessity exist for
the suspension of the Charter Rule or requirement that no ordinance or
resolution shall be passed finally on the date it is introduced, and
that each ordinance or resolution shall be read at three meetings of the
City Council; L, therefore, hereby request that you suspend said Charter
Rule or requirement and pass this ordinance finally can the date it is
introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
MAYOR
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
The Charter rule was suspended by the following vote:
Leslie Wasserman
Jack DeForrest
Harney Cott
Sydney E. Herndon
George L. Lowman
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Leslie Wasserman
Jack DeForrest
Barney Cott_"
Sydney E. Herndon
George L. Lowman
n
a9TI-