HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 01/26/1977 - SpecialMINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 26, 1977
3:30 P.M.
PRESENT:
Mayor Jason Luby
Mayor Pro Tem Bill Tipton
Councilmembers:
Eduardo E. de Ases
Ruth Gill
Bob Gulley
Edward Sample
Hall.
City Manager R. Marvin Townsend
Assistant City Manager Archie N. Walker
Executive Assistant City Attorney
Michael May
City Secretary Bill G. Read
Mayor Luby called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City
City Secretary Read noted there was a quorum present.
City Manager Townsend announced the public hearing on Application No.
1276-7, Conn -Sherrod Company, Inc., for change of zoning from "R -1B" One -family
Dwelling District to "A-2" Apartment House District, located on the south side
of Houston Street, approximately 138 feet east of Kostoryz Road, being a 1.93+
acre tract of land out of the unrecorded Laughlin Addition. He reviewed that
the recommendation of the Planning Commission is that it be approved; but that
the Planning Staff recommends denial and in lieu thereof that "R-2" be approved, which
would permit 14 units per acre. He added that two responses have been received
in favor of the zoning change.
Chief Planner Larry Wenger then summarized the surrounding zoning and land
uses.
Mr. Bob Sherrod, the applicant, addressed the Council that although "A-2"
allows 34 units per acre, they are only planning to build 24 units per acre.
Speaking in favor was Mr. R. C. Hall of H. E. B., who said they are the
seller of the property and also own the remaining adjacent property. He stated
he believes the rezoning request is very reasonable and asked that it be granted.
In opposition was Mr. Charles Jackson, who said he owns nearby property
and is not opposed to the project but thinks it will increase traffic on Houston
MICROFILMED.
'SEP 0 31980
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 2
Street. However, he agreed to a special permit.
There was some discussion among the Council that the applicant could
go ahead and build 34 units per acre with the "A-2" zoning. Gulley argued that
if 34 units were allowed under the ordinance it must be feasible. Councilmember
Gill expressed doubt about approving the request because it would not be tied to
a site plan and they could in fact build more units. Councilmember de Ases
stated he does not believe the applicant would do so after making a public
statement that they plan 24 units per acre on the property.
Motion by de Ases that the hearing be closed; seconded by Gulley and passed
unanimously.
Motion by Gulley to grant "A-2" zoning as recommended by the Planning
Commission; seconded by de Ases and passed unanimously.
City Manager Townsend left the meeting to go out of town on business, and
Assistant City Manager Walker took over.
Mr. Walker announced the public hearing on Application #1276-8, M. B. Essary,
for change of zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "I-2" Light
Industrial District, located on the northwest corner of Suntide Road and Leopard
Street, being an 8.19+ acre tract of land out of the northeast portion of Lot 28
and the southeast portion of Lot 32, H. B. Sheppard Farm Lots. He stated that
the recommendation of the Planning Commission is that it be approved; and that
the Planning Staff believes there is a pattern of "B-4" zoning in the area and,
therefore,recommends denial of "I-2", and in lieu thereof "B-4" be approved.
He reported that two responses have been returned in favor of the request. Chief
Planner Wenger summarized the surrounding zoning and land uses.
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton called for those in the audience who wished to speak
regarding the application. Mr. 0. J. Douglas stated he had no opposition to the
requested zoning change, but wanted it on record that he is asking for a screening
fence to be required to separate the commercial use from his "R -1B" property.
Mr. Wenger replied that a standard screening fence would be required.
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 3
A lady from the audience asked what kind of light industry would be
allowed, and what the applicant plans for the property. Chief Planner Wenger
read the list of uses allowed under "I-2" zoning. Councilmember de Ases informed
her that an office/warehouse is currently planned, as stated at the Planning
Commission's Meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton called for the applicant, and Mr. M. B. Essary told
the Council that he bought the property ten years ago for residential or business
use; that he now believes the land is better suited for "I-2" since "B-4" zoning
would need more residences in the area to support it. He stated he has an individual
who wishes to purchase the property, and introduced Mr. Richard Smith. Mr. Smith
said he wishes to move his engineering design and construction business. from Houston,
and explained he would build a large office building on the rear of the property,
with a warehouse facility abutting it. He explained other possible uses for the
property in the future, including a strip shopping center fronting on Leopard.
A gentlemen then asked that if it turns out that Mr. Smith does not purchase the
property and follow through with his plans, could another person build whatever
he wished. Mayor Luby answered that that was unfortunately true.
Councilmember Sample expressed his opinion that if Mr. Smith plans to put
a strip shopping center on the front portion of the property, he would like to see
that portion zoned "B-4" rather than "I-2" in order to protect Leopard Street;
Councilmember Gill agreed, and asked how much land he would need for the shopping center.
Mr. Smith argued that as the area stands right now it would not support a
shopping center, and he could not say if or when it ever would, because the surrounding
land would need to be developed with residences'. He stated that they would like
to have it all zoned industrial as requested; and later,if they want a shopping
center,they could rezone the front.
Councilmember Gulley remarked that he is glad to see someone moving here from
Houston rather than to Houston, and that he believes the Council should grant the
request and not hamstring the man. He added that the property is vacant now.
Councilmember Sample stated he does not believe Mr, Smith's mention of a
future shopping center is well founded.
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 4
Motion by Gulley that the hearing be closed; seconded by de Ases and passed --
with Sample voting No.
Motion by Gulley that "I-2" be granted; seconded by Tipton and passed --with
Sample voting No.
Mr. Walker next announced Application #1276-10, Pearl Murphy, for change
of zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "R-2" Multiple Dwelling
District, located on the north side of Bonner Drive, east of Nelson Lane and west
of Betty Jean Drive, being Lots 26 and 27, Block 7, Gardendale #2. He explained
that the Planning Commission and Staff recommend denial. He added that the 20%
rule is in effect, requiring six affirmative votes to pass the ordinance.
Chief Planner Wenger summarized the surrounding zoning and land uses. He
reported that eight responses have been received in opposition, and three in favor.
He also explained that the subject property is a non -conforming use, and the surrouding
property is totally used for single-family residences.
Ms. Lou Morrow spoke for the applicant, stating that Mrs. Murphy wishes to
rent the apartment in the house to a gentleman; but that since the man would not
be there much of the time he wants a separate meter. She stated that separate
meters are not allowed under the present zoning, which is why they made the application.
She stressed that Mrs. Murphy would not add on to the house or move anything onto
the property, but merely wishes to lease the existing apartment. She added that
both the house and apartment are vacant now, but have been used previously for two
families. She further explained that Mrs. Murphy could rent the apartment now but
could not have separate meters; and she stated separate meters are allowed under a
special permit, and she is agreeable to that.
Speaking in opposition was Mr. Tom Carlisle, 5030 Bonner, who stated he
does not believe spot zoning would be good for this area. He said the streets in
the neighborhood are very narrow, and you cannot park cars there. He mentioned
that he has a garage apartment in back of his house, but was told that he couldn't
rent it out. Mr. Carlisle said he was speaking for five other neighbors in the
audience. After some discussion, they agreed that they would not be opposed to
a special permit.
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 5
Mr. Tom R. Petty objected to the request, saying he thought it would open
the area up to more apartments. He told the Council he is concerned about the
value of his property. He complained that nearby property owners have been
splitting their lots up so they can put apartments or houses on the rear of their
property, and he urged the City to check into that, saying the area is becoming
a mess. When asked if he opposed granting a special permit to allow two meters,
he answered that if she gets two meters, why couldn't he get one. Councilmember
Gulley asked him if he wanted one, and he replied no, not at the present time but
that he is elderly and his income is small and he might want to rent out his
vacant rooms at some future date.
Mrs. Aust addressed the Council that she does not object to the special
permit. She said that the house was divided illegally, but she does not think
Mrs. Murphy who now owns it should have to suffer for that. She also urged the
City inspectors to check the area for other illegal uses.
Motion by Gulley that the hearing be closed; seconded by Tipton and passed
unanimously.
Assistant City Manager Walker reminded the Council that the 20% rule is
in effect on this case.
Motion by Tipton that the application be denied; seconded by Gill.
Under discussion, Dr. Tipton stated he thought approving this request would
only encourage others to do the same thing. Councilmember Gulley voiced his opinion
that he would like to see Mrs. Murphy be able to rent her apartment; he mentioned
again that most of the neighbors do not object to it, and there are actually two
lots involved. Councilmember Gill said she agrees with Mr. Petty's points and thinks
it would set a precedent. Mayor Pro Tem Tipton pointed out that the apartment can
still be rented -- that it just can't have two meters.
Mayor Luby called for the vote on the Motion that it be denied; the Motion
passed --with de Ases and Gulley voting No.
Assistant City Manager Walker then announced the public hearing on Application
#1276-12, Seaside Memorial Park Association, Inc., for change of zoning from "AT"
Apartment Tourist District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District, located along
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 6
the southwest right of way line of Ocean Drive approximately 850 feet south of
Robert Drive, being a 1.5+ acre tract of land being a portion of Seaside Camp
Meeting Grounds. He added that the 20% rule is in effect, requiring six affirmative
votes for passage of the ordinance.
Mr. Richard Stone, attorney representing the application, asked the Council
to table the case until a full Council is present, since it requires six votes and
one Councilmember is absent today.
Motion by Gulley that the application be tabled.
Mr. Bob Kirmse interrupted, saying he is the owner of the adjacent Sea Ranch
Motel, is vitally interested in the matter and strongly objects to its being tabled.
It was determined there were about 30 other persons in the audience for this public
hearing.
Councilmember Gulley responded that -- in fairness to all -- the Council has
always tabled applications under the 20% rule when a member of the Council is absent.
Councilmember Gill countered that they just heard and acted, on the previous case
where the 20% rule was in effect, and Mr. Lozano was absent. Councilmember de Ases
added that on the previous case it was evident that two members of the Council were
going to vote against it, so it wouldn't have mattered if a full Council was present
or not because the application would still have failed. Mayor Luby then asked
Councilmember de Ases if he and any other Councilmembers were against this application.
Mr. de Ases replied that he hasn't heard the presentation yet so he didn't know,
because he doesn't make his mind up in advance. Mayor Pro Tem Tipton asked Mr.
Kirmse if he could come back later when a full Council was present to hear the case.
Mr. Kirmse replied no, that he is "exhausted almost to the point of being a nervous
wreck"; that he is under "day-to-day pressure" regarding this zoning case; and
stressed that they are dealing with his "livelihood". He charged that he could
not afford "a fancy lawyer like Mr. Ryan has", and pleaded with the Council to
to hear the case now.
Mr. Richard Stone addressed the Council that it was Mr. Kirmse's protest
whichinvoked the 20% rule on the case; that if Mr. Kirmse wishes to withdraw it,
they would agree to go forward.
Mr. Kirmse agreed to withdraw his written opposition.
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 7
Mayor Luby recessed the meeting at 4:43 p.m. so the Staff could determine
whether Mr. Kirmse could withdraw his opposition to the case, he said.
The Special Council Meeting was resumed at 4;50 p.m.
Assistant City Manager Walker briefed the Council that the Staff thinks
Mr. Kirmse has the right to withdraw his opposition, which would remove the 20%
rule; and that it would then take four votes to approve the special permit as
recommended by the Planning Commission and five votes to grant "8-4" as requested.
He added that the applicants could withdraw the application if they so desired.
Mr. Kirmse stated he hereby withdrew his opposition so the case could be
heard. Mayor Luby then announced that the 20% rule would not be in effect.
Mr. Richard Stone asked that the vote on the case be tabled until a full
Council is present.
Assistant City Manager Walker stated that he thought Mr. Kirmse removed his
written opposition in order to move the hearing ahead and reach a decision. Mr.
Kirmse agreed that is what he wished.
After much discussion, the Council agreed to proceed with the hearing today
and vote on the matter today.
Assistant City Manager Walker proceeded to review the application; explaining
that the Planning Commission recommends that the "B -l" be denied, but in lieu
thereof a special permit be approved for a mortuary tied to the site plan presented.
He stated'that the Planning Staff recommends denial of this and any proposed business
zoning or use along Ocean Drive. He showed the Council the site plan as reviewed
by the Planning Commission. Chief Planner Wenger reviewed the surrounding zoning
and land uses. He explained that the mortuary would be located on the rear of the
property and not on Ocean Drive -- about 280' from the gate.
Attorney Richard Stone first stated there has been a lot of publicity
concerning th;s case, and a lot of misconceptions -- including a comment that
there would be "bones on Ocean Drive". He asked the Council to disregard those
previous statements. He stressed that Seaside is attempting to downzone the area;
he read the list of uses allowable under the present "AT" zoning. He stated that
they could presently construct a mausoleum right up to Ocean Drive, but emphasized
that they, too, are concerned about preserving that street. Mr. Stone explained
Minutes •
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 8
that they are proposing a single use -- a funeral home -- which would be located
soma 280' in back of Ocean Drive, or almost the length of a football field.
Mr. Morgan Spears, architect for the applicant, showed slides of other
funeral homes in Corpus Christi -- pointing out their location, surrounding
structures, and the fact that most of them do not have screening. He further
explained Seaside's proposal, stressing that heavy planting would screen the area
so that the funeral home itself would not be visible from Ocean Drive. He showed
slides of the Memorial Park at present, pointing out its landscaping and screening.
Mr. Spears stressed that they are trying to build a building that will serve the
purpose, and "are not trying to attract the attention of everybody in Corpus Christi".
He stated that the funeral home would be of Spanish architecture and very attractive.
He explained that an unmarked station wagon would be used to carry the body, and
would drive in through the rear of the building -- that the garage door would open
automatically and then close, and nothing would be seen. He went on that the
identification of the property would be by a fountain at the entrance with letters
only 6" high engraved, "Seaside Memorial Park"; that there would be no sign saying
funeral home.
A gentleman from the audience inquired about parking. Mr. Spears responded
that the chapel will seat 200 people; that under the zoning ordinance, 40 parking
spaces would be necessary; he stressed that they plan to have 64 -- or one -and -one-
half times the requirement.
A gentleman from the audience interrupted and asked what part of their plans
would be on the property of the Dixie Shore Motel. Attorney Stone responded none;
that another application was made for that but was withdrawn before it was heard
by the Planning Commission. Therefore, the Council said they would not consider
that question.
Mayor Luby invited the audience to speak up whenever they had questions.
Attorney Stone continued and passed around letters to the Council representing
the Dixie Shore Motel, Four Seasons Apartments and the Jamaican Apartments -- all
supporting the special permit and further stating that the cemetery has had no
psychological ill effects on their respective businesses. He then called on Mr.
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 9
Larry Urban, of Urban Engineering, who stressed that they would have -more than the
required number of parking spaces; that memorial service hours are usually from
10 to 4, which are not peak traffic hours; and that it would be on an individual
arrival basis. He also brought out that if the property were developed under the
present AT zoning, 120 parking spaces would be required rather than their 40
spaces, and it would also be the highest density use under the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Victor Vaughan questioned how many exits there would be, saying he
thinks there would only be two. Mr. Urban showed on the map that there would be
five exits.
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton then objected to the matter in which the meeting was
being conducted; he called for some continuity such as first hearing the applicant's
presentation, then those in opposition and in favor. Mayor Luby stated he was in
charge of the meeting and wanted to hear from the people. He declared Dr. Tipton
to be out of order and gavelled him down.
Mr. Joe Riquelmy, owner of the Bay House Apartments, charged that "the ,
apartment market in Corpus Christi is full, and that's why those apartments are
rented." He stressed he could not imagine the owners of the Four Season and Jamaican
apartment complexes approving a funeral home next to them.
Attorney Richard Stone responded that he has letters from the managers of
the Four Seasons and Jamaican apartments, and the owners of the Dixie Shore Motel
all supporting the zoning request.
Mr. Riquelmy replied that there is a big difference between the managers and
the owners.
A lady from the audience interrupted heatedly that the owner of the Dixie
Shore Motel lives in Canada and she does not think his letter should be considered;
also that their motel is for sale anyway.
Mrs. Lorraine Ryan, wife of one of the principles of Seaside Memorial Park
Association, addressed the Council that she feels her integrity and honesty have
been questioned by some of the comments made. She stated she and her husband have
been here longer than 30 years, and she resents some of the remarks that have been
made.
January 26, 1977
Page 10
Mr. Joe Dawson addressed the Council that in 1947, when Seaside Memorial
Park was zoned, it was in the country -- but is now in the center of the community.
He objected to the zoning change, sayigg Ocean Drive is ";he front door or showcase
of Corpus Christi and he thinks this application would constitute spot zoning and
is an effort to encroach on it. He called a cemetery a "monopoly" in Corpus
Christi and urged that the request be denied.
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton asked Mr. Dawson if he would object to apartments on
the property, which the applicants could build now. Mr. Dawson replied that he
thinks a funeral home is a business; and that apartments are totally consistent with
what is already there. Councilmember Gulley asked Mr. Dawson if he thought it was
all right to build motels and apartments on Ocean Drive and you would still•be
protecting it -- but a building 280' back from the street would not be protecting it.
Mr. Dawson stated again that it is a business and a monopoly. Mr. Gulley asked him
if he didn't believe hotels and motels are businesses; Mr. Dawson replied yes.
Mr. Byron Zimmerman stated he has been in the funeral home business in
Corpus Christi for about 40 years; he said he failed to get the connection between
funeral homes being a business and motels not being a business.
Mr. Bob Arnold, 4333 Ocean Drive, told the Council he owns the Catalina
Motel and apartments and some other vacant property in the area. He objected to
the site plan as presented, saying a two-story building would be very difficult to
hide.
Councilmember Gulley asked him if he would prefer having a three-story
apartment house next door rather than a two-story building 280' back from Ocean
Drive. He replied that he hopes some day this area wobld be developed with condominiums
or high-rises.
Mr. Bob Kirmse, owner of the Sea Ranch Motel and property across Ocean Drive,
including the Yardarm Restaurant, spoke in opposition. 'He stated that the funeral
home would have a large undertaking parlor with a store for the display and sale of
coffins. He questioned whether they actually had "AT" zoning or not, and if they
could legally have gravesites on the property. Mr. Kirmse stressed that tourism is
vital to his business; that most of his winter guests are older or retired people
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 11
from the Midwest, many of whom return year after year. He stressed that they need
crosswalks in the area so they can safely cross Ocean Drive, eating facilities
close by and more to do within walking distance; but that "the one thing they do
not need is the contemplated project -- a continual reminder of death."
Assistant City Manager Walker responded that the property is zoned "AT"; and
that if there are deed restrictions on it, that is a civil matter and one that is
not before the Council.
Attorney Stone clarified that they will have to file an application with the
court to allow a mortuary to be built on the property, but must get the "B-1" zoning
first. He pointed out that San Antonio has two funeral homes within cemeteries,
and quoted figures to show that is the current trend.
Mr. Charlie Jackson, also in the funeral business, agreed that approving the
request would be creating a monopoly, and added that it would be more competition
to him. He cited that millions of dollars have been spent on Ocean Drive; that
Corpus Christi's future is the tourist trade, and that Ocean Drive is an integral
part of that tourist trade.
Councilmember Sample asked Mr. Jackson to elaborate on his statement that
it would be creating a monopoly. Mr. Jackson answered that under present statutes,
cemeteries serving Corpus Christi would have to be five miles outside of the city
limits. Mr. Sample responded that it appears to him that the applicant is building
a mortuary and not making a cemetery. Councilmember Gulley pointed out that there
is more than one other mortuary in the city limits, so he does not believe this
would be a monopoly.
Councilmember de Ases then asked for consistency and order in the presentation
and that the Council either hear all those in opposition first or those in favor.
Mrs. Marjorie Kirmse spoke against the application, saying Seaside might have
viewings until midnight. She stated she thought they would be using Ocean Drive
exclusively even though there are other entrances; that people are not always going
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 12
to use that chapel, which might mean long processionals with traffic held up in
both directions for quite some time.
Mr. Carlos Guerguin, of the Riviera apartment complex, said Corpus Christi
needs tourism so much and derives a lot of money from tourism, and cannot get that
from people in a graveyard. He maintained that tourists spend a lot of money in
the city, and will tell others about Corpus Christi too. He stated he believes
"we should cater more to the living."
Mrs. Zella Guerguin asked if the applicants could put a crematorium in if
their request is granted. Mr. Wenger replied that they could not do so under a
special permit.
Mr. Jack Ryan, Chairman of the Board of Seaside Memorial Park, addressed
the Council that there is not a major city in the State of Texas that does not
have a mortuary in its cemeteries; that it is a service to the people. He quoted
cases as far back as 1936 supporting mortuaries in cemeteries.
Attorney Stone reiterated that they are asking for less use of the property;
that they have no intention of putting a crematorium in, and showed that it was not
in the site plan. He summed up by asking the Council to vote for the special permit.
Motion by de Ases that the hearing be closed; seconded by Gulley and passed
unanimously.
Under discussion, Councilmember Gulley acknowledged that all citizens of
Corpus Christi are concerned about preserving Ocean Drive, but that this building
would be well screened and located 280' back from the street. He stated he hasn't
heard anything relative to the application that would be a detriment to the area.
Councilmember Sample stated he had some reservations earlier but after viewing
the property and the present well -landscaped entrance and hearing the presentations,
he thinks it would be well screened on both sides. Councilmember Gill stated she
feels that in the future it would be a good idea to build mortuaries in the cemeteries,
and that dea= is a part of life; but that she is against spot zoning on Ocean
Drive and would vote against it. Councilmember Gulley stated they could issue a
special permit as recommended by the Planning Commission.
In further discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Tipton maintained he could not see how
a mortuary could be called a business, but uses allowed under "AT" would not be.
He agreed that preservation of Ocean Drive is vital, but said he thinks it has been
preserved.
Minutes
Special Council Meeting
January 26, 1977
Page 13
Councilmember Gill explained that "AT" zoning is where people live, and that
is different from business. Councilmember Gulley responded that people live in
big motels, and they are a business.
Councilmember de Ases spoke up that as is evident from the site plan,
preparations for the facility have been very well thought out and laid out; but
that he is not sure that building a mortuary would reduce the traffic on Ocean
Drive. He added that he has not been swayed by the comments of the competitors,
but that he is concerned about preserving the beauty and mystique of Ocean Drive.
Councilmember Gulley responded that he believes they are all concerned about
preserving the appearance of Ocean Drive, and said if they planned to build a tall
apartment house right up on the front of the street -- which they have the right
to do -- he would be real concerned. He again stressed that the building would be
280' back from the street and well screened.
Motion by Gulley to grant the special permit; seconded by Tipton.
Under discussion, Assistant City Manager Walker reminded the Council to keep
in mind that if the request is approved, others may see this as a business and may
make requests in the future for business zoning for other portions of Ocean Drive.
He stated that it may establish a precedent, and urged careful consideration.
Mayor Luby stated he is against the proposal because of traffic congestion.
The Motion to grant the special permit failed -- with Gulley and Tipton voting
Aye; de Ases, Gill, Luby and Sample voting No.
There being no further business at this Special Council Meeting, it was
adjourned at 6:35 p.m. to resume the Regular Council Meeting.
I, Jason Luby, Mayor of the City of Corpus Christi, certify that the foregoing
minutes same being for the period of January 5, 1977 to January 26, 1977, inclusive
and having been previously approved by Coundil,action are by me hereby approved.
1/5/77 - Special Council Mtg.
1/5/77 - Regular Council Mtg.
1/11/77- Special Council Mtg.
1/12/77 - Regular Council Mtg.
1/19/77 - Regular Council Mtg.
1/26/77 — Regular Council Mtg.
1/26/77 - Special Council Mtg.
City of Corpus Christi.
I, JASON LUBY, Mayor of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, certify that
the foregoing minutes, same being for the period of December 8, 1976
through December 29, 1976, inclusive, and having been previously approved
by Council action, are by me hereby approved, as itemized:
12/8/76 - Regular Meeting
12/8/76 - Special Meeting
12/15/76 - Regular Meeting
12/15/76 - Special Meeting
12/22/76 - Regular Meeting
12/29/76 - Regular Meeting
J•:i , Mayor
City of Corpus Christi
MICROFILMED
SEP 0 31980