The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04904 ORD - 11/13/1957AN OSDINANCE CLOSDG'TFT Ei?ARLNG GDES TO THE REAL AND TRUE 90ERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE POR.TI0N OF MDRG.AN STR -T FROM THE CENTER LINE OF OCEIM DRITRE TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LTN' OF NTI E-SNTH STP—T, PRESCOTT STREET FROM THE WE 4R- LY BOUNDARY LINE OF BRObN-LZE BOUDIITlRD TO A PO L9^i APPRCAI- MATELY 100 F,-'7T 'if -tST CF THE WESTERLY BOUNDIARY LINE OF BRaiNLEE BCUL- 71AID, '-'-ND NIJ'TSFMIT :: STRE -N !�ROP ' . THE SOvTH BOIP.'(DAF,Y L= OF NO GAN STFIT_ TO TIE NTORTIT ESS."T' RLY aG ,�I�iY L =,EET AS TO SPF.CiAL BE.''7F�FITS TO AMIUE TO SAL) FROPIT27 AND T"_ ' AL L'M THIJ�• OiJviRS THSREGF, BY VIFTUE OF TLIE L:4=1'%:�'13-ITS OFD SAD STREETS '.,'ITHI7 THE' LTI4ITS DEFLN"",D, A;dD :;S TO 2T1 3R`OR5, :uD L'TVVALIDITTES OR IPREGUL9HMES LQd ANY OF TYE FROG "DIHOS CF COiv'FACT ThE -,EOF, OV:TScULING AND DEIDNG ALL P;OTl3STS ADD OBJECTIONS aC3?T THE GFi'NGM '.yi�L3CTED H,--cEJN, 3=rliG AI'D DETE-L ITI iDG THAT TH- PFCPL.TY ABU'_TIAiG UPON T-E r Trpar CF MORGAN S R7FT, P..FSCOTT STF,r,'T Vj N T-.'.T ENTF STR --Z_, 3ITTHIN TFE L11112S lIFFI TE7, ':TILL BE SPECIALLY B! iEFIT--D AND -N F:1[•;C;;D 1T tiALU^ LJ 7 CESS OF '311-E AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID 4,PT ?Dj7iZTidTS PFCPCSED TO 9E JI7 AS rEIRF L4 ASSEaSED AGADTST SAID P ILKY- ABUTT2,, UPCNT PO'r.TIONS OF MORGAN STREFT, PFF.SCOTT STREET !17J iiN..Tr3 lTrt STRrh:T L'JV w' I`C AN zISESS�'E1dT FOP TiE P.A`n ^ ^ "NT Q. A PORTION OF THE COST Dr Lr OV `.^LLnTTS ON SAD STR-"T-TS, 57ITd211 S..D LETIM, Frd IP.G A CHARGE ATU LIEN AGALiST TIS PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SA I.) STR3aTS AUD THE R AL AND TRUE Odi�ER OF, O"ETERS �1� ER -"'CF, F'_l o-i DIPiG FOR T E 1SCUA3`TC7 OF sE "a IG1113LE CEMi TWICATES UPUK THE GDNPL TIO'i�- v_T' ACC�PTL ^ICE OF Se TO WCRr, Ti`-' U IIR AifL) TI••'L OF PATIENT AND PROVDING THE NAPINrB. AIdD IrMFOD OF COLLECTION; OF SAD ASSESSpjRNTS AND CAF:TIl? TCA7ES; AY-) DECLARINC .1, -, =. :CY. ',Ui- :TEAS, Tha Ci +,y Council o£ Corpus Christi, Texas, dilly el acted erdi_Lance passed and a ^_proved on Se te* :icor 11, 1957, determined the necessity for, and oraered the JTrrove ^eats of portions of :'brgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, ,;,thin the 1- -'mts hereinafter defined, in the mar- -nor and accord- ing to the nIans anc, specification-- heretofore approved and.adeeted by the City Council by ordinance dated S'epterber 11, 1957,'said portions of said streets to be improved being as `allows, to-wit: "orean Street frcr the center line of Ocean_ Drive to the westerly '00"Idary line of Nineteenth Street, Prescott Street from the westerly boundary line of Brownlee Boulevard to a point approximately 100 feet west of the westerly boundary line of Brownlee Boulevard, Tineteenth Street From the south ooiindary line of :.organ Street '_o the nortnwesteri-, boundary line of Eiiagara Street; a duly executed -otice o' said ordinance having been £ilea in the name of said City trith the County Clergy of _dueces Goulty, Texas; and - :;I- '_I �_S, sa'r. City C'oi.nc it o' the Ci t, e£ Corpus Clsist i, Texas, after having advartised for and received bids on the corstruction of said imnrovemouts qqoq � 6 for the len�th of time and in the manner and form as required by the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas, and after having duly and regularly made appropriation of funds available for such purpose to cover the estimated cost of said improvements to said City, all as provided by the Corpus Christi City Charter and by law, did award a contract for the construction of said improvements to Heldenfels Brothers on its lowest and most advantageous bid and said contract has been heretofore duly executed by said City of Corpus Christi and hRldenfels Brothers, and is dated January 28, 1957, and the Performance Bond. required by said contract has been properly furnished by said Heldenfela Brothers, and accepted by said City Council of said City as to form and amount as required by the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas; and 'dt Rre1S, the said City Council has caused the Director of Public Works to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the property abutting upon portions of Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, within the limits herein defined, to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said Director of Public Works has heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of other matters relating thereto with said City Council, and same has been received, examined and approved by said City Council; and I%EKLEAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated September 11, 1957, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on portions of Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and did order and set a hearing to be held at 3:00 orclock P.M., on October 2, 1957, in the Council CI -amber of the City Hall of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property abutting upon said street, within the limits above defined, and for all others owning or claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property, or any of said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against each parcel of abutting property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and as to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue of said :improvements, if .any, or concerning any error, invalidity, irresularity or deficiency in any proveedings, or contract, to appear and be heard in person or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said matters; and said City Council did by said ordinance order and direct the City Secretary to give notice of said hearing to the real and true owners of the property abutting upon said streets, within the limits defined, by publication in the Corpus Christi Times, the official newspaper of the City of Corpus Christi, a newspaper published in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, of general circulation, said notice to be published in said newspaper at least three (3) tines prior to the date of said hearing, the first publication of which to be at least ten (10) days prior thereto, all as provided for and in accordance with the provisions of said City Charter and of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as Article 1105 -b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and WHE :,^HAS, said City Council did further order and direct said City Secretary, in addition to said published notice as aforesaid, which was provided to be valid and sufficient in itself, to include in said notice a list of the apparent owners of said abbutting property as set out in said Director of Public Works' written report, and providing that said list of apparent owners and the descriptions of said properties, so included, shall be cumulative of and in addition to the requirements of said notice as required by law and shall not be conclusive as to the real and true owners or the descriptions of said abutting property nor limit said notice to such owners gamed, or the properties described, but that said notice shall nevertheless be directed to the real and true owner or owners of said abutting property, whether named or correctly named, or said property described or correctly described therein or not; and WEER.AS, said notice as ordered and directed by said City Council and as required by said Acts and Charter of said City as above identified, was duly given publication of same in the Corpus Christi Times, a newspaper published in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, on September 21, 1957, September 28, 1957, and October 1, 1957, said notice so published having included therein a -3- list of the apparent owners as set out in said Director of Publis Works' written report as directed in the aforesaid ordinance; and WHEREAS, after due, rewlar and proper notice thereof, all as pro- vided by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing, of which notice was given, was opened and held on October 2, 1957, at 3:00 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chardoer of the City !fall in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all said above mentioned persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents and attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following appeared and offered the following testimony: -4- MR. ORAHN JONES, UTAECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY OF CIRPUS CHRISTI, APPEARED BEFORE THE REARING, TESTIFYING TO THE EFFECT THAT THE SCOPE OF THE MORGAN STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OF 1957, EXTEN05 FROM OCEAN DRIVE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION THROUGH THE INTERSEC- TION OF NINETEENTH AND MORGAN STREET. A STREET IS BEING CONSTRUCTED, INTERSECTIONS AND 5IDEWALKS WHERE THEY ARE NEEDED. THE STREET IMPROVE- MENTS INCLUDES CURB AND GUTTERS. THE STREET IS 44 FEET WIDE FROM FACE TO FACE OF CURB. LEAVING A 41 FOOT PAVED AREA. THE IMPROVEMENTS IN- CLUDE ALLEYWAY INTERSECTIONS AND STREET INTERSECTIONS, ALL TO BE CON- STRUCTED IN THE SAME MANNER OF SPECIFICATIONS. MR. T. RAY KRING, CITY SECRETARY, MARKED THE PLANS ON AN EXHIBIT TO THE PAVING AS BEING THE PLANS OF THE MORGAN STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OF 1957. A PROPOSED ASSESS- MENT ROLL WAS PREPARED UNDER MR. JONES' DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MR. JONES STATED THAT THESE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS WERE BASED ON PART PAYMENT BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND PART BY THE CITY. THE CITY 15 PAYING THE FULL COST OF PAVING THE IMTERSEC- TIONS, BOTH STREETS AND ALLEYS. THE DRIVEWAYS ARE BORNE 100 PERCENT BY THE PROPERTY OWNER EXCEPT WHERE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ARE NOW IN PLACE. CREDIT HAS BEEN GIVEN IN OUR ASSE55MENT ROLLS FOR EXISTING CURBS AND SIDEWALKS. HE STATED THAT PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE HEADER CURBS ARE GIVEN NO CREDIT, DESCRIBING THE HEADER CURB AS ONE WITH NO SKIRT OR GUTTER. ON OUR 44 FOOT STREETS THE CONSTRUCTION COST FOR CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE $1.60 PER FOOT. THE SIDEWALK WILL BE 40 CENTS PER SQUARE FOOT. THE COST OF CONCRETE DRIVE- WAYS 15 60 CENTS AND ASSESSMENT COST FOR CURB AND GUTTERS IS $1.28 PER SQUARE FOOT. THE ASSESSMENT RATE ON CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS 15 60 CENTS OR 100 PERCENT. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOT CHARGED WITH MORE THAN 90 PERCENT OF THE SURFACING COSTS. THERE ARE TWO WAYS OF PAYING FOR THESE ASSESS- MENTS, FIRST TO PAY CASH, SECOND, IN INSTALLMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS 20 DAYS BEFORE HIS FIRST PAYMENT BECOMES DUE, THEN HE PAYS 4 MORE PAYMENTS ANNUALLY AFTER THAT. THERE 15 A 5 PERCENT INTEREST CARRIED ON THESE PAYMENTS. MR. JONES IDENTIFIED THE ASSESSMENTS AS PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, AND THE CITY SECRETARY MARKED AS EXHIBIT NB• MR. GREGORY MOORE WAS CALLED TO THE STAND AND STATED HI5 OCCUPATION AS REAL ESTATE APPRAISING, AND THAT HE HAD BEEN ENGAGED IN THAT BUSINESS FOR ABOUT 30 YEARS. HAVING HAD COURSES IN SHREVEPORT.LOVISfANA AND NEW ORLEANS PREPARATORY TO BECOMMING AN M.A.I, WHICH DENOTES THE HIGHEST ACHIEVEMENT THAT AN APPRAISER CAN ATTAIN. MR. MOORE STATED THAT HE HAS BEEN APPRAISING REAL ESTATE RATHER ACTIVELY 75 TO 100 PERCENT OF H15 TIME IN COMMERCIAL, APARTMENT, RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, SPECIAL AND PROPERTIES OF VARIOUS KINDS IN OUR AREA, AND STATED THAT, IN DETERMINING VALUE OF PROPERTY, IT IS AN EXCEPTED FACT THAT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DO BENEFIT FROM PAVING. MR. MOORE SAID HE HAD VIEWED THE PROPERTIES WHICH ARE INVOLVED IN THIS PROJECT THE DAY BEFORE THE HEARING AND THE MORNING OF pCTOSER 2. 1957, AND THAT HE HAD OBSERVED EVERY PIECE OF PROPERTY SEVERAL TIMES, AND THAT BASED ON HIS OBSERVATION AND OPINION, THE COST OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS IS OF SPECIAL BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTY, AND THAT THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS INCREASE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TO THE AMOUNT OF THE ASSESSMENT AND POSSIBLY MORE. MR. FRED QUAILE TESTIFIED, STATING HIS OCCUPATION AS REAL ESTATE, HAVING BEEN IN THAT OCCUPATION FOR 35 YEARS: THAT HE PA55ED THE EXAMINATION FOR M. A. I., BUT DID NOT GET THE CERTIFICATE. MR. QUAILS STATED HE HAD OCCASION TO VIEW EACH AND EVERY PIECE OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS BEING ASSESSED THE DAY BEFORE THE HEARING, OCTOBER 1, 1957, AND HAD THE BENEFIT OF THE PLANS OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WITH HTM. HE STATED THAT, IN HIS OPINION, EACH OF THESE PROPERTIES WILL BE SPECIALLY BENEFITED BY THESE IMPROVEMENTS AND ENHANCED IN VALUE AT LEAST IN THE AMOUNT OF THE ASSESSMENT OR PROBABLY CONSIDERABLY MORE. MR. THEODORE WEBER, OWNING LOT 10, BLOCK 6, BAYVIEW J1, APPEARED AND TESTIFIED THAT AS A MAJORITY OF PEOPLE REALIZE, IMPROVING A STREET SUCH AS THIS 15 NOT VERY BENEFICIAL TO THE HOME OWNER: THAT IT DOES NOT IN PARTICULAR HELP THEM: THAT HE FEELS AN ASSESSMENT OF THIS KIND SHOULD BE PAID FOR MORE IN PROPORTION BY BUSINESS OWNERS THAN BY HOME OWNERS. DAVE COOVER, REPRESENTING J. Y. WOMACK, LOT 10, BLOCK 13, BAY - VIEW f1, SAID MR. WOMACK FEELS HE CANNOT BE EQUALLY BENEFITED ON THE FRONT FOOT VALUE, SINCE HIS PROPERTY FRONTS ON ALAMEDA AND HAS A 129 FOOT LENGTH ON MORGAN, AND THE SAME PRICE BEING CHARGED ON ASSESSMENTS ON THE SIDE LOT AS ON OTHER FRONT LOTS. MR. WOMACK FEELS THERE 15 AN INEQUITY. - 6 - TED ANDERSON, REPRESENTING MRS. R. G. BRYANT AND R. J. BRYANT, LOT 11, BLOCK 13. BAYVIEW f1, SAID HIS CLIENT'S PROPERTY WILL BE DEPRECIATED BY AT LEAST $30.000; THAT THE PROJECT IS MORE IN THE NATURE OF A CONDEMNATION RATHER THAN AN IMPROVEMENT: THAT THE BRYANTS OWN A BUSINES5- APARTMENT BUILDING AT MORGAN AND ALAMEDA, AND WILL LOOSE THEIR PRESENT HEAD -IN PARKING SPACE AND BE FORCED TO FILL IN A SUNKEN PLACE LEFT BY THE PARKING SPACE BETWEEN THE NEW STREET EDGE AND THE SIDEWALK. MRS. MAGGIE HUDSON, OWNING MIDDLE OF LOT 11. BLOCK 15. BAY- VIEW #I, PROTESTED CHARGES IN OFF- STREET PARKING LOTS WHICH WOULD REQUIRE GRADE CHANGES AND SIDEWALKS BETWEEN THEIR BUILDINGS AND THE LOTS. WM. R. LOESSBERG, OWNING EAST 6W OF LOT 11, BLOCK 9, BAY- VIEW J2, PROTESTED THAT HE OWNS ONLY HALF A LOT, AND THEY ARE CHARGING HIM AN ASSESSMENT THE SAME AS THE MAN WHO OWNS 150 FEET/ ALSO PROTESTED CHARGES IN OFF - STREET PARKING L075 WHICH WOULD REQUIRE GRADE CHANGES AND SIDEWALKS BETWEEN THEIR BUILDINGS AND THE LOT. HAROLD ALBERTS, REPRESENTING HIS OWN PROPERTY, LOT 10, BLOCK 4 BAYVIEW J3, SAID HIS PROPERTY 15 ONLY 53 FEET DEEP AND IS BEING ASSE55- ED AT THE SAME RATE AS OTHER PROPERTY 150 FEET DEEP. WM. ROSCOE, LOT 11, BLOCK 4, BAYVIEW J3, SAID HE PROTESTED INEQUITIES AND THAT HIS PROPERTY INVOLVED SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME PROBLEM AS THE HAROLD ALBERTS PROPERTY, ALSO THAT HE WOULD BE COMPELLED TO BUILD A SIDEWALK ACROSS TWO ALLEYS WHICH NOBODY WOULD EVER USE. SYLVAN WEIL, LOT 20. BLOCK 1, BAYVIEW #4, PROTESTED CHARGES IN OFF- STREET PARKING LOTS, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE GRADE CHANGES AND SIDEWALKS BETWEEN MIS BUILDINGS AND THE LOTS. W. B. BEST. LOT 21, BLOCK 10, BAYVIEW g3, WAS REPRESENTED BY DAVE COOV ER. MR. COOVER SAID MR. BEST PROTESTS BECAUSE OF PARKING PROBLEM, AND BEING FORCED TO BUILD A SIDEWALK ON HIS OWN PROPERTY. MRS. ETHEL G. MCCAULEY, OWNING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OCEAN VIEW. SAID HER PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE DECREASING IN VALUE SINCE THE PAVING PRO- JECT. SHE STATED THAT SHE PROTESTS BEING FORCED TO BUILD A SIDEWALK WHICH SHE DOESNIT NEED, AND THAT CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE A WASTE OF MONEY AND THAT SHE FEELS SHE WILL NOT BE BENEFITED AT ALL. - 7 - • 0 ANNIE C. SHAW. OWNING W 67.51 OF LOT 22, BLOCK 1. OCEAN VIEW, SAID SHE DID NOT FEEL HER PROPERTY WOULD BE BENEFITED, THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO BUILD A RETAINING WALL, WOULD LOOSE CHINESE TALLOW TREE AND WILL RUIN HER LAWN. WM. WAGENSCHEIN, OWNING PARTS OF LOTS 55, 56, AND 57, BLOCK 1200, BAY TERRACE #2. STATED THAT HE FEELS HE WILL NOT BE BENEFITED ONE CENT; THAT ASSESSMENTS ARE TOO HIGH, AND THAT CARS WILL BE TOO CL05E TO M15 BEDROOM WINDOW. CECIL 0. DUNN. C 451 OF LOT 4. OCEAN VIEW, PROTESTED THAT HE HAS A 45 FOOT LOT AND IS BEING ASSESSED FOR 48 FEET. HE SAID WHEN THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETE. AND WHEN HE IS DRIVING EAST, HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO TURN INTO HIS DRIVEWAY. THE LOCAL UNION 1423 OF BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA OBJECTED TO ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED ON 202.7 FEET OF FRONTAGE WHEN DEED RECORDS SHOW THEY OWN 41.29 FEET OF FRONTAGE. A LETTER WAS SENT TO THE COUNCIL BY ATTORNEY CECIL BURNEY. MAYOR FARRELL SMITH EX- PLAINED THAT THE EXTRA FOOTAGE WAS PLACED ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLLS BECAUSE THE CITY HAD EXPECTED TO MAKE A PROPERTY TRADE WITH THE CARPENTERS UNION. - 8 - o There being no further testimony offered or any further parties appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the said. hearing was declared closed; and no further parties appearing and no further testimony being offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of said abutting property as compared to the cost of the improvements of said portions of said streets proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities, in the proceedings or contract heretofore had in reference to the improvements of said streets; and WESHEAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said improvements on said streets, within the limits above defined, and has heard all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all protests and objections relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidities or L regularities in any of the proceedings and contract for said improvements, and has g ?vet a full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to make any such protest, objection, or offer testimony and has fully examined and considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests offered and based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said City Council finds that each and every parcel of property abutting upon portions of Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, rithin the limits to be improved as herein defined, will be enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construction o•' said improve- ments upon the said streets upon which said property abuts, in an amount in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements proposed to be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each end every said parcel of abutting property, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City Council did consider and correct all errors, inval"oitfee or deficiencies called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas, under which these proceedings were being had, and the proceedings of said City Council heretofore -5- y had with reference to such improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments hereinbelow made and the charges hereby declared a�%inst said abutting property on said T;organ Street, Prescott Street and N eteenth Street and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable and did adopt the rule of apportioront set forth below and the division of the cost of said improvements between said abutting properties, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable, and as producing substantial equality considering the benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby, and that all objections and protests should be ererruled and denied: =r01I, T- ?OiiS, 3I IT OUJF L!c0 3Y 'PHA CITY COiTiC IL O THE' CIT OF COHPUS CHRISTI, T-1,-AS: SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for or against said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners of abutting property on said street, wit'oin the 1Lmits above defined, and to all persons, _ °i=,, cornora i_)ns and, esi,�tes, ovnin_ or cis i*i -:;g s zae or any i -nt =rest therein, be, see is hereby closed end all protests and objections, whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be, sad the same are hereby over- ruled and denied. SECTMIT 2. Thaa said City Cmuicilhereby finds and determines upon the evidence heard is reference to each and every parcel of property abutting upon Morgan Sheet, Prescott- Stre =_t and Nineteenth Street, within the limits defined, that the special benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and true owner or o.:ners tereof, by virtue of the constructions of said improvements to said portions of said street upon which said orope -ty abuts, will be in excess of the amcunt of the cost of said improvements as proposed to be, and as 'herein aesessed against said abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of the cost of said improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow made are just and equitable and produce sucstantial equality considering the benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and the Charter -6- provision of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore had with reference to said improvements are in all respects regilar, proper and valid, and that all prereouisites to the £ixinu of the assessment liens against said abutting properties, as he_reinabove des- cribed. and the personal liability of the real anal true owner or owners thereof, w,etner nailed or correctly named herein or not, have been in all things regularly had and performed in compliance with the law, Chester provisions and proceedings o' the said City Council. S'3CTIC:Q 3. That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted by said City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, within the limits hereinabove defined, and in pursuance of said proceedin_s heretofore had and. enacted by said City Council in reference to said improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to said street imprcvements by the laws of the State of Texas anc, the Charter of said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as Article 1105 -b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Tess, as amended, there shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon said portions of said streets, and against the real and true owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein or not, the several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels of said property, the numoer of front feet of each and the several amounts assessed against same and the real and true owner or owners there- of, and names of the apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted by said City Council, being as follows, to -wit: -7- 1. '. FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT NORTH SIDE OF MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19M STREET HeldeaYels Brothers CONTRACTOR .TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix Asphalt Base and Surface 44' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE 28 ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND Co ION COST dr (amt including Cost of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot $1.60 CURB AND GUTTER sidewalk or driveways) $6.662 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot Based on 44 feet of street width. Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot 0. Computed by: Checked by: Lin. aseeement Sidewalk idewalk Drive- Drive- ditional sessment Credit for Exist. sidewalk 696 Tmta1 PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION ock Lot Oth t. ft. of Paving and Curb and Square Feet sess- went way . Ft. way Assess- Head -in gutter, curb & Eng. sees - No. No. p. h sve Gutter ment Parking gutter & Drway. AsOessffte meat OCEAD DRIVE Ted Weber Bay View #1 6 10 135' 135' 897.29 -- -- 190.0 114.00 -- 286.80 47.09 771.58 City of Corpus Chri i " 6 Alley 15' _ S. S. Hanes " 6 11 __ 135' 1 5' 997.29_ _ - - 211.0 126.60 -- 299.4o 4 8 8EC0 STREET Mrs. Francis McFadden 7 10 135' 135' 897.29 540.0 - _172.80 -- -- -- 172.80 58.32 955.61 City of Corpus Christi" 7 Allev 15' 1351 1 89 46o.0 147.20 141.0 84.60 THIRDSPIiEET - ,one.- a %oF.i - --- 160.52 - 160.52' - - - -- -- 125' - _ - 1066.92 --- - - - - -- 630.8 -- - -- - - - -- 456.60 -- 273.96 - - -- -- 408.75 60.59 992.72 J. R. Mann B Moore 8 W 125' of Ll - -- 12�__ - _ - _- -- -- 160.00 4 .6 4.4 Mrs.E. _ SA_NTA FjE_SU ET Jno.R.&E.C. Thomas 9 5 55.32 _55.32 - 367.69 __ _- _'- -- - 70.81 19.30 316.18 Emma c. Thomas 9 6 50.0 50.0 332.33 -- -- - -- -- -- 64.00 17.44. 285.77 - James M. Tyr ee - -- 50.0 _3 - -- - -- -. -_ "- - -- 64.00 1 17.44_ 285.77 +9- ■ Exist. Curb & Gutter " Exist. Sidewalk � Exist. Conc. Driveway *c .. Ex/5f G-o'c, Guife� _.FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 2. NORTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREET TYPE OF PAVEMEIiT 6" Hot -Mix As t Base and Surface - Heldenfe16 Brothers CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE January 1957 ' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION COST ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER Cost of Curb and Gutter per linear foot 1.60 (Not including sidewalk or driveways) $6.6`1662 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 0 Based on 44 feet of street width. I Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot 0. Computed by: Checked by: -- PROPERTY OWNER .. NAME OF ADDITION Block No. Lot No. Length Abut. Prop. in. ft. of prove- ments Assessme aving and rb and Gutter Sidewalk Sq. Ft. Sidewalk Assess- ment Drive- way Sq.Ft. iveway Assess- ment AdGIT1 o =asmen Head -ia Fsrking e or Exist. aidewe].k go ter,curb & gutter & drvay. Eng. Assess- ment Total Assess- ment Louie Coltzman Bay View #1 10 10 135' 135' 897.29 2 FIFTH STREET o 59.40 - 177.28 56.24 921.41 City of Corpus Chris i " 10 Alley 15' r. James A. Webb " 10 11 135' 135' 897.29 484.0 154.881 99.0 59.40 -- 211.44 58.51 958.64 SIXTH STREET Kra. Anna H. Sark 11 10 135' 135' 897.29 540.0 172.8 -- -- -- 172.80 58.32 955.61 city of corpus Chris i " 11 Alley 15' Minnie Ruth Sorenson 11 11 135' 135' 897.29 148.0 1 47.36 85.0 51.00 - 176.64 53.24 872.25 MIVENTH STREET Beryl Smith 12 10 128' 128' 850.77 444.0 142.08 120.0 72.00 - 169.28 58.21 953.78 City of Corpus Chris i' 12 Alley 15' Joe W. Johnson 12 11 118' 118' 784.30 -- -- 850.30 75.52 101.34 1660.42 SOUTH STAPLES STRIET Mrs. J.Y. Womack 13 10 1-291 1291 857.41 264.,0 84.48 -- -- -- 82.56 .55.86 915.19 City of Corpus Chris i 13 All 1' R.G.8R.J. Bryant 13 11 139' 139' 923.88 .62.1 24.84i 88.96 55.88 1 915.64 + Exist. Curb and Gutter 'M'w Exist. Sidewalk Exist. Conc. Driveway 31lE EX 4S,4 Canc. Guffe� • Exist. Curb and Gutter ■* Exist. Sidewalk *** Exist. Conc. Driveway A*.* exrsr. cork. - 3- ,- FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT NORTH SID E MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREET Heldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot- Jt Base and Surface Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE J +`"nry 1957 - ASSESSMENT BATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER ' CONS'T'RUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways) •64662 Coat of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot Based on 44 feet of street width. Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot .60 0 Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot Computed by: Checked by: Lot ngth Lin. ft. of sessment and Sidewalk Sidewalk Drive ve- o Cr e or way way sessment Exist. sidewalk, & a Eng. Assess- Total Assess - pMpM= OWNER NAME OF ADDITION S1oc No. No. Abut. Improve Curb and Curb Sq.Ft. Aeaeas- Sq.Ft. Assess- - in tter� curb Parking gutter & drway• moat ment Prop. meats Cutter went went -- 88.96 65.83 1078.67 View 1 14 10 139' 139' 923.88 556.0 177.92 -- -- E. R. Coats C1t of CcrpueChri i " 14 Alley 1✓` -- 177.92 60.05 983.93 P.J. & M.P. nne 14 11 1' 1' ,8$ 6 177.92 -- -- V1 1 D. P e l0 139' 139' 923• 88 Tnm 484.0 STREET 154.88 127• 76.20 355.84 51.94 851.06 E1lzabeth Whit Bay View #1 15 ` 1 151 0771 47' 47' 312.39 188.0. 60.16 -- -- -- 60.16 20.31 332.70 Mrs. 011ie Womack 15 46' 46' 305.74 136.0 43.52 __ 2.28 85.0 51.00 3 23.85 390.83 Maggie L. Hudson 15 i1 { 58•� 19.87 325.61 15 of 11 46' 46` 305.74 184.0 58.88 -- -- Mrs. 011ie Womack / STREET 103.5' 687-93 8.0 101. 6 1 101.40 -- 264, 6 40.70 666.83 J. 0. Spencer View of 10 10 10 72.96 9.9 4 162.89 W 85 28.5 28.5 189.43 114.0 36.48 -- -- -- Wm.& Irene 3 Alley 151 . -- 168.96 46.05 754.44 Cit of Cc s Chris 1 3 3 11 132' 132' 877.35 -- Sam Ferris TWELFTH hTIRMET Elp � -- 56.32 15.35 251.48 q 44' 44' 292.45 -- '- -- -- H. B. Hanson • Exist. Curb and Gutter ■* Exist. Sidewalk *** Exist. Conc. Driveway A*.* exrsr. cork. - _ FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 4' NORTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREET TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix As t Base and Surface Heldeafele Brothers CDNTAACTOR CONTRACT DATE January 2 1957 ' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 0031' ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER Cost of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot 1.60 (Not including sidewalk or driveways) 96.64662 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot Based on 44 feet of street width. Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot �PO.bo- Computed by: Checked by: PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Bloc No. Lot. No. ength Abut. Prop. . of rove- met- eVsmen Paving and Curb and Gutter Sidewalk Sq.Ft. Sidewalk Assess - ment Drive way Sq.Ft. - Drive. .way -. ftmsebgmm o sessment Head -in Parking Credit for Exist. Sidewalk, gutter, curb & gutter & drway. z Eng. Assess - went I Total Aseess- went Elsworth Wilcox Bay View #2 4 ..,164' 44' 44' 299-45 __ __ 71.0 42.60 -- 59.52 17.91 293.44 �alntaace 4 W10 ' 44' 44' 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- -- 56.32 15.35 251.48 City of Corpus Chris 4 Alley 15` Jewel W. Holoman 4 Eu 44' 44' 2 2.4 1 6.0 6. -- -- -- 93:.62 16.58 271.73 Mrs. L. H. Gross 4 Cil 44' 44' .4 128.0 40.96 85.0 l.00 -- 60.16 21.08 345.33 mmi -C. P. Cullman 4 W1 44' 44' 292.45 176.o 56.32. -- -- -- 56.32 19.01 3u.46 BOULEv Joe F. Hall 9 10 132' 132' 877.35 188.0 60.16 598• 358.80 -- 171.68 77•00 �6�•63 City of Corpus Christ 9 Arley 15' Wm. R. Loeasber 11 66' 66' 438.68 264.0 84.48 -- - -- 42.24 31.26 512.18 Erna B. Rudolph 9 W116' 66' 418.68 61.44 12 6.20 -- o.24 .60 1 .68 STREET Clifford J. Herritag Bay view #3 3 10 132' 132' 877.35 t336 107.52 33.80 -- 168.96 66.22 1004.93 Cit of Co us Chris 3 eY 15' Willie Mae and 1 ' 1 2' 8 15 .60 85.0 51.00 -- 172.80 59.09 968.2 • Exist. Curb and Gutter '"'a Exist. Sidewalk a Exist. Conc. Driveway **** Exisf Conc. Guff�i 5• - FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT NORTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DANE TO 19Th STREET Heldenfele Brothers CONTRACTOR TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix Asphalt Base and Surface Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE January 28, 1957 - ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways) $6.64662 Cost of i and Gutter per near sot $1.60 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot �T� � Based on 44 feet of street width. S Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot 0. 0 Computed by: Checked by: Lin. Assessment ditional Credit for 6� Length ft.of :Paving and Sidewalk rivew Drivew ssessment Exist. eldewalk� Eng. Total Assess- PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Bloc Lot Abut. Improve- Curb and 5ldeualk Assess- Sq.Ft. Assess- Parking gutter, curb & tter & d"ay. Assess- meat ment No. Prop. ments Gutter S Ft. ment went Area FIFT1 ENTH ste er and ' 1 8 28 168.96 -- - 737.21 64.48 110.44 1809.48 H egd Bay Vlew i 4 4 4 10 Alley 1 1' 132' 132' - 877.35 1,12M. V 112.64 345 207.00 352.24 375.96 76.26 - 1249.53 tA1 f Cc s Chris Krs. Wm. Rascoe 11 SI)LT1 ERTH STRE IT -- 56.32 15.35 251.48 Mrs. Wm. Roscoe 9 10 44' 44' 292.45 -- - -- --- C10 44' 44' 2 2.4 -- -' .0 42.60 --- 1 .08 2 .81 El-sea Peckenpaugh --- 56.32 15-35 251.48 Mrs. Noelie Shaw 9 0 44' 44' 292.45 -- --- Christi 9 e53' 15' City of Corpus E117 -- 72.96 19.88 325.78 0. A. Neumann 9 57' S7' 378.86 -- - --- - W175' -- - 96.00 26.16 428.66 Walden " 9 1Z� 75' 75' 498.50 - _ _ -- N.H. S H ST l0 22 70' 70' 465.26 140.0 44.80 246. 147.60 - -- 56.00 39.11 640.77 Frank & I. Breslau 10 21 49' 49' 325.68 6, 5 0 17.92 246.o 147.6o - -- 42.56 29.16 477,80 W. B. Fred Best Fdwar " l0 20 49' 49' 325.68 148.0 47.36 85.0 51.00 -__ 66.56 23.24 380.72 Alma Cathledge 66.56 23.24 80. 2 " l0 19 49' 49' 325.68 148.0 47.36 85.0 51.00 - Clara N. Johnson James Santikos 10 17&18 136.87 136.87 909.72 267.48 85.55 492.0 295.20 - -- ii0.00 FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 6• NORTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREET TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix Asphalt Base and Surface CONTRACT DATE January 2 1957 _ _ _ Hsldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION COST ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER Cost of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot 1.60 (Not including sidewalk or driveways) $46.64662 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 0.40 Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot 0.60 Based on 44 feet of street width. . Computed by: Checked by: PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Bloc No. Lot No. Length Abut. Prop. Lin. - ft. of, Improve- menta Assessment Paving and Curb and Gutter Sidewalk Sq.Ft. Sidewalk Assess- went Drive- way Sq.Ft.,,ment lvevay -- seas- _Add tl �Assessme .Head -in ' Parking.. re for .Exist. sidewalk gutter, curb & gutter & drway. z Eng. Assesa- ment Total Assess - ment Sylvan & Ruth Weil Bay View #4 1 20 18.40 118.4o 766.96 473.6 151.55 -- -- 864,94 75.78 112.30 1839.97 J. H. Mann 1 1 118.25 118.25 785.96 151.54 48.49 436 261.60 192.76 75.68 78.85 1291.98 * Exist. Curb and Gutter w Exist. Sidewalk r Exist. Cone. Driveway **i * EX"1 co-, Geer k. FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT SOUTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREJsT TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix As t Pase and Surface Heldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE January 2 1951 CONSTRUCTION COST Cost of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot $1.O. O Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot ' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CORN AND GUTTER (Not including sidewalk or driveways) 6$ 64662 Based on 44 feet of street width. Computed by: Checked by: * Exist. Curb and Gutter Exist. Sidewalk Exist. Cone. Driveway+* Exisf Conc. Gu�fe/ o re or Length Lin. ft. of sessmen Paving and Sidewalk Drive- Driveway sessment Exist.sidewalk� Eug. Total PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Bloc Lot Abut. Improve- Curb and Sidewalk Assess- way Asaesa- Head -in Parking gutter, curb & gutter & drway. Assess- ment sess- ment No. No. Prop. ments Gutter Sq.Ft. went Sq.Ft. went 135' 897.29 4 BS 51.00 -- 223.80 57.33 .563.56' Ethel G. McCauley Ocean View 1 1 135' City of Corpus Chria 1 1 e 15' 86.40 29.16 477.81 Louise Michelsen 1 2 T 67.5' 67.5' 448.65 270.0 86.40 -- - -- Annie C. Shaw 1 227 67.5' 67.5' 448.65 270.0 66.40 -- -- - 86.40 29.16 477.81 SECONI STREET 2 1 135' 135' 897.29 -- -- 71.0 42.60 -- 215.4o 47.09 771 -58 Wo.E. Wagenachein City of Corpus Chris " 2 Alley 15' 172.80 47-09 771.5 E Helen nd 2 22 135' 135' 897.29 - -- -- - Barean THIRI STREET 135' 897.29 -- - 452. 271026 44+•06 4 Continental 011 Co. 3 1 135' City of Corpus Chris Alley 15' 4 8 Mrs. E. Mayme Moore 3 22 135' 135' 897-29 -- SANTA -- STREET -- -- - -- i72.8c 219.11 73.96 1211.73 M. M. Sadler " Park All 71.18 171.18 137-77 684. 219.11 -- -- - FIFTH STREET * Exist. Curb and Gutter Exist. Sidewalk Exist. Cone. Driveway+* Exisf Conc. Gu�fe/ FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT SOUTH SIDE MORCAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREET TypE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot-Mi It Base and Surface CONTRACT DATE i anuary 2 I 1957 CONSTRUCTION COST Cost of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot 1:600 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot C t of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot 0. 0 Heldenfeis Brothers CONTRACTOR 441 Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER (Not 4ncluding sidewalk or driveways) $6.64662 Based on 44 feet of street width. Computed by: Checked by: 06 PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION ocean view lock No. Lot No. Length Abut. Prop. Lin. ft. of Improve- ment Assessment Paving and Curb and Gutter idewalk Sq. Ft. Sidewalk Assess- went Drive - way S .Ft. Drive - way Assess- ment Additional Assessment Read-in Parking Credit for Exist.sidewalk, gutter, curb & gutter & 6% Eng. !sees- Total Aasess- Mrs. Arnie 4 E1 5' 45' 45' 299.10 -' '- -- - -- 57.60 15-70 257.20 Cecil 0. Dunn " 4 C145' 4 45' 2 .10 -- -- l.o 42.60 -- 4. 6 16.08 26 .42 . Cole „ 4 W1 5 45 45' 299.10 - -- - 57.60 15.70 257.20 City Cor s Chris . Atkinson 1 4 4 _ All. 22 15' 135' 135' 89'1.29 - -- -- -- -- 172.80 4 .09 .58 . Philli a " 5 1 135' 135' 897.29 -- - 141.0 84.60 -- l 8.40 0. 8 4.42 f Corpus Chris ders 1 �' 5 Alley 22 15' 135' 135' .2 180.0 .60 127.o 6.2o - 178.56 .41 go 7.94 iaf SEVENTH STREET V. Barcellona Booty and Allen's 2 22 128' 128' 850.77 456 145.92 99 59.40 -- 86.40 63.03 1032.72 f Corpus Chris it and 1 2 Alley 15' __ __ 471.0 282.60 -- 433.64 41.16 674.42 Co 50 STAP S STREET St � Oil Co.� l 22 129' 129' 857.41 236.0 75.52 492.0 2 f Corpus Chris 1 " 1 e 15' * Exist. Curb and Gutter ** Exist. Sidewalk *** Exist. Cone. Driveway *V**w Ex'sX. cc, c. C1uY7r. 9• FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT • SOUTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE To 19TH STREET TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix Apahai_t Base and Surface Heldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE_ January 2 1957 ' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION COST ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER Cost of Curb and Gutter per near oot $1.60 (Not including sidewalk or driveways $6.646 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 0 Based on 44 feet of street width Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot Co uted b Checked by Lin. ASSESSMENT dltional Credit for 63 Length of Paving and Sidewalk Drive- Drive ay sessment exiet.aidewalk, Eng. Total PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Bloc Lot Abut. Improve - Curb and Sidewalk Assess- way Assess- Head -in gutter, curb & Assess- Assess - No Nc. Prop. meats Gutter Sq.Ft. meat Sq.Ft. went Parking gutter & drway. meat ment FirstNational Bank pAiiAn Booty & Allen's 1 1 139t 1 .88 148.0 88.80 - -- 266.72 48.4 .4 SOUTH A ST. MEr Lot Evangelist Lutheran Church au�hes 2 44 139' 139' 923.88 -- - -- --- --- - -- L 2 48Aq 794.45 City of Corpus Chris " 2 Alley 15' Eugenia Ella Moody 2 1 139' 139' 923.88 - -- - - -- 190.0 114.00 - -- 212.48 53.65 879.05 TENT 9 STREET L. Susser 1� 90' 90' 598.20 36o.o 115.20 -- - -- - -- 115.20 38.88 637.08 Irene Grossman 1 4�4 49' 49' 325.68 196.0 62. - -- 62. 21.1 46.8 City of Corpus Chris 1 ley 15' Frank Breslau 1 1149, 49- 49, 25.68 6 ll. 2 -- - -- - -- 62-72 17.84 292.32 Stevenson ' '190' 90' 90' 598.20 - - --- --- 115.20 31.40 514.40 City of Cor us Chris Terrace #2 901 ALL 224.2 224.2 14 0.1 -- - -- -- - -- - -- 286.97 78.21 1281.41 TWELFM STREET rtis venue Baptist Church 1001 c9 ai 3' sb 280.7 280•'78 1866.24 __ - -- -- - -- - -- 4 359. 0 97.9 4 164+.78 B WNLEE EO ARD _pRESCOTT STHEVP * Exist. Curb and Gutter ** Exist. Sidewalk *" Exist. Conc. Driveway IK .* A L X1sf Comic. GaA`ei' 10. FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT SOUTH SIDE MORGAN STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE 7O 19TH STREET Heldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR TYPE OF PAYEMENT 6" Hot - d SurYace Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE January 2 1957 ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION COST 6.64662 (Not including sidewalk or driveways) Cost of Curb and Gutter per Linear Foot D:0 Based on 44 feet of street width Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 0 Cost of Concrete Driveway per re Sq Foot Computed by: Checked by: Lin. Assessment Additional credit or z Length ft. of Paving and Sidewalk Drive- i-ay Assessment ist. sidewalk, Eng. Total sess- Assent PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Block Lot Abut. Improve- Curb and idewalk Assess- way Assess- Head -in gutter, curb & Assess- Sq.Ft. meat Parking gutter & drway. No. No. Prop. ments Gutter Sq.Ft. went Bay Terrace 1100 135.25 135.25 135.25' 898.96 327 104.64 377 226.00 -- 103.68 7318 1199.10 Sinclair Ref. Co. 1100 W. 65.5 65.55 65.55 435.69 262.20 83.90 - --- "" 41.95 31.05 508.69 Ito d Henderson FOURTEE STR Mary A. Randall 1200 7 & 8 140.39 140.39 933.12 561.56 179.70 -- - -- 1207.53 89.85 144.98 2375.48 ra.t °' 144D.39 933.12 24 .56 79.86 '549 329.40 -- u4.81 79.79 1307.36 Wm. E Wagenschein 1200 L40.39 F 00 12 46. 46. ll.00 18 .16 --- -- 2 4 22.16 6 .11 N 46.79 46.79 311.00 187.16 59.89 -- --- 301.90 29.94 41.79 684.64 R. E. Williams 1 00 1300 12•� fiz.i9 e 60.8 6 .8 404. 1 1 8.4 6 .4 40 .2 42. 2 w, s. Harris 0' S 6 372.03 42.41 54.80 897.95 M. L. Trau fiber 1 SSS 65070 . 00,65 65.70 � 436.68 201.72 .26 64.55 -- 47.08 33.81 553.98 Dr. Geo. Whitne GO 65.70 SIX NTH %7181.16114 Seid & Wadia Karam 400 0 & 21 140. 14o. .12 61. 6 1 o --- 1 0 6o.6 --- 1 0 48. 802. Ada 011 Compa 400 42'41� 14o. 14o. .12 H r Exist. Curb and Gutter oat Exist. Sidewalk M•xar Exist. Cony;. Driveway **** Exisf COnC. GUffC�_ FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 11. SOUTH SIDE MORGAN STPWr FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO 19TH STREET Heldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR TYPE of PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix Base and Surface • Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE - CONSTRUCTION COST n(NNot�Sincl RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER $ Cost of Curb and Gutter per Lineal' Foot 1.60 (Rot including sidewalk or driveways) 6.64662 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 0• Based on 44 feet of street width. Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot W.by Computed by: Checked by: ona re or- PROPERTY OWINER NAME OF ADDITION Block No. Lot No. Length Abut. Prop. Lin. ft. of Improve- ments Assessment Paving and Curb and Gutter ides k Sq. Sidewalk ments Driveway Amenta Assessmcn Parking ist. sidcgslk, tter, &cdrway. Esg. ments Total mesnts- Gulf 011 Co. Paul W. Alford The Texas Com Terrace 2 1500 1500 1500 ./t-10 i "ae; r 112.31 67.39 101.08 112.31 •67.39 101.08 746.48 447.92 671.84 169.24 173.56 - -- 54.16 55.54 - -- F49-2-. 9 295.20 59•x0 295.20 -- -- 94.28 47.61 424.59 65.10 33.49 35.26 1x66.66 548.74 577.71 EIG Local Union 1423 1600 32 41,29 .4j_,. 9 274,44 165,16 52.85 0 0.00 - -- 21 -27 348.56 N * Exist. Curb and Gutter * Exist. Sidewalks Exist. Cone. Driveway " *. Exist Con.. GrusYe� FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 12• SOUT}I SIDE PRESCOTT STREET FROM BROWNLEE TO 1PPROXIMA'1F.LY 100' WEST TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mlx As halt Base and Surface Heldenfels Brothers CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE January 2 1957 -- Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION COST ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND CUTTER Cost of Curb and Gutter per Lineal 1.6o (Not including sidewalk or driveways) $6.13658 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 0 Based on 40 feet of street width. Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot 0. 0 Computed by: Checked by: PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Block No. Lot No. 1Prop. Length Abut. 'Lin. ft. of Improve- menta Assessment Paving and Curb and Gutter Sidewalk SQ,Ft, Sidewalk Assess- ment Drive- way 5 .Ft. Driveway Assess- ment Additional Assessment Head -in Parking Credit for exist. sidewalk,-Eng. gutter, curb & tte & druay. 6z6 Assess- Total Assess- BROI rNLES BOUI EVARD Cliff Harpole Bay Terrace No. 1101 32 1'5 76.19 467.55 -- - -- -- -- -- - -- 3o.39- 4 I I I I I TOTAL pSSESSMENJ: I 'I 1 69,811 °70 _ I 1 Owner: Original Contr ct Price Additional Cost for Read -in Assessment to TOTAL CONSTRUC�IAN COST TO CITY: 13. FINALPAVING ASSESSMENT . HEST SIDE 19TH STREET FROM MORGAN STREET TO NIAGARA STREET TYPE OF PAVEMENT 6" Hot -Mix As halt Base and Surface HeldenfFac Brothers CONTRACTOR 0 Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE January 2 1957 ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways) 6$ 13658 Cost of Curb and Gutter per Llncer Feot 1.60 Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot .40 Based on 40 feet of street width. Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Foot O• Computed by: Checked by: Lin. Assessment Additional Credit for - OWNER NAME OF ADDITION Block hot Length Ft. of Paving and Sidewalk Sidewalk DrivewarDriveway Assessment exist. sidewalk Eng. Total PROPERTY No. No. abut. rove- Curb and Sq. Ft. Assess- Sq.Ft. Assess- Head -in gutter, curb & Assess- Assess - ro . ments Gutter ment ment Parking gutter & drway. went went MORGAN Fred Frank Segrest Addition 12 9 67.66 38.80 238.10 -- -- -- -- -- -- 15.48 253.58 I I I I I TOTAL pSSESSMENJ: I 'I 1 69,811 °70 _ I 1 Owner: Original Contr ct Price Additional Cost for Read -in Assessment to TOTAL CONSTRUC�IAN COST TO CITY: : a 4 s SECTION — 3- Ti ZUREER ORDALNED That in the event the actual frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of said improva,,nts to be a'reater -or less than the number of feet hareinabove st; =_tad the assessments herein set against any such property and against the real and true owner or owners thereof shall be, and the sar.•.e are hereby declared to be increased o.^ decreased as the case ray be, in the proportion which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall oear to the iLole = —ber of front feet of rroperty actually imin'oved in accordance with the front . foot rate of assess- ment herein adopted, it being the intentions that each parcel of property and the real and true owner or owners thereof abutting on portions of Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, within the limits above defined, shall pay for said improvements Colder the "FPC T FOOT HULE OR. PLaei", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and equitable and to produce a .substantial equality, 'navi.ne in view of the special benefits to b= received and the burdens inposed thereby; and it is further ordained that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on said portions of Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth S treet, all certificates hereinafter provided for, issued to evidence said assessments a-a;nst said parcels of property abuttin�, upon said streets, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual frontage of said property and the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said certificate in no case to exceed the amount herein assessed against such property unless such increase be caused by an excess of front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost and such actual number of front feet, if different from the herein - above shown in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the Director of Public works upon completion of said work on Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, arc. the findings of said Director of Public tiorks shall be final and bind- ing upon all carties concerned. SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof assessed against said parcels of property abutting on portions of ibrgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of Section 4 hereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of five percent (5%) Per annum with reasonable attorneyls fees and all costs and expenses of collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a first and prior lien upon the respective rarcels of property, against whirl; same are essesssd fro =a and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, touait: September 11, 19;7, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true owner or owners thereof, whether or not such owner or owners be named or correctly named herein, and that said lien shall be and constituta the first and prior enforceable claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and pa° amount lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem taxes; and that the same so assessed shall be payable as follows, to- it: in five (5) equal annual installments, the first of which will be payable on or before twenty (20) days after the completion of said improvements in the street upon which the respective property abuts, and acceptance thereof by the said City Council, the four (4) remaining installments to be due and payable, respectively, one (1), two (2), three (3), and four () ) years from and after said date of acceptance, deferrec payments to bear interest from said date of acceotance at the rate of five percent (5') per annum, payable annually concurrently with each of said installments; mast due installments of principal and int =_rest to bear interest at the same rate per annum until paid; provided, however, that any owner of such property shat have the right to pay of_" the entire aneimt of such assessment, or any installment thereof, before maturity, by paying principal and accrued interest to date of said payment; and provided, further, that if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when due, then the entire amount of said assessment upon which such default is made, shall, at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, be, and become immediately due and payable and shall be collectible together with reasonable attorneyls fees and all costs and expenses of collection if incurred. SECTION 6. That the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall not in any manner be liable for the payment of any sums hereby validly assessed against any -9- abutting property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, but Heldenfels Brothers, shill 1001: solely to such property ana the real and true owner or owners thereof, for the payment of the sizz validly assessed against said respective parcels of property, but said City shall be obligated to furnish F.eldenfels Brothers valid assessments and assessment certificates and shall exercise all of its lawful powers and aid in the enforcement and collection of said liens and assessments; and if aefault shall be grade in the payment of any of said sums herein assessed against the said parcels of property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, collection thereof shall be enforced at the option of Hsldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, either by suit in any Court having juris- diction or by sale of the property assessed as nearly as possible in the mariner as may be provided by law and Charter in force in said City for the sale of property for the collection of ad valorem taxes. =TION 7. That for the purpose of evidencin- said assessments, the liens securinE sane and the several sums assessed against the said uarcels of property en?, the real and true owner or o•,rners thereof, an,d the tine and terns of payment, and tc aid is the enforcement thereof, a=sh -nable certificates shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to eeldenfels Brothers, upon the completion of said inprovements in said streets and acceptance thereof by said City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the Hay0r in the name of the City, attested by the City :secretary with the corporate seal of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts of said assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon, the date of the completion and acceptance of the _nurovements for which the csrkficate is issued, and shall contain the names of the apparent true evaer or owners as accurately as possible, and the description of t.e property assessed by lot and block number, or front foot thereof, or such other description as may otherwise identify the same, and if the said property shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so state the £act shall be sufficient and no error or mistake in dsecribint such uroperty or in givin7 the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in an;•,n.dise invalidate or impair the assessment levied hereby or the certificate issued in evidence thereof. -10- That the said certificate shall further provide substantially that if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when due then at the option of Feldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidenced thereby shall at once become due and dyable, dad shall be collectible with reasonable attorney's fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and said certificate shall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the real and true owners or owner of such property, whether named or correctly named therein or not, and the lien upon such property, and that said lien is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles and charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the Bete said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -nit: September 11, 1977, and shall provide in effect that if default shall be made in the pa—ent thereof, the same nay be enforced, at the option of Eeldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, by the sale of the property therein des- cribed in the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above recited, or by suit in any Court having jurisdiction. That said certificates shall fuLther recite in effect that all the proceedings with refere -ace to making said improvements have been reeularly had in compliance with the law and Charter in force in said. City and the proceedings of said City Council of said City, and that all prereouisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property therein described, or attempted to be described, and the personal liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, evidenced by such certificates, have been regularly done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the matters and facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be required in asy Court. That all said certificates may ',cave coupons attached thereto in evidence of each or any of the several installments thereof, which may be signed with the facsimile signatures of the kayor and City Secretary. That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, when requested -11- o' so to do by the holder of said certificates, to aid in the enforcement and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain other and further recitals Pertinent and appropriate thereto. it shall not be necessary that said certi- ficates shall be in the exact for. as above set forth, but the substance and effect thereo_` shall suffice. SECT 1014 8. That all such assessments levied are a personal Liability and charge against the real and, true owner or ots;ars of the Property described, or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not be named or correctly- named, and any irregularity in the name of the property owner, or the description of any property or the amount of arC7 assessment, or in any other matter or thing shall not in amvise invalidate or impair any assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued, and such mistake, or error, invalidity or irregularity whether in such assessment or in the certificate issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not required to be, to be enforceble, corrected at any time by the said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Further that the omission of said improvements in front of anv part or parcel of property abutting upon portions of :ioraan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth Street, which is exempt iron the lien of said assessment, shall in no vise effect or impair the validity of assessments against the other Parcels of property abu +.ting upon said streets; and that the total amounts assessed against the respective Parcels of Property abutting upon said streets, within the limits herein defined, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the estimate of said assessment Prepared by the Director of Public Works and approved and adopted by said City Council and are in accordance with the proceedings of said City Council relative to said improvements and assessments therefor, and with the terms, powers and provisions of said Chapter 106 of the Acts of the =irst- Called cession of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, =mown as Article 1105 -b of Vernonts Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under which terms, powers and provisions said proceedings, said improvements and assessments were had and made by said City Council. SECTION 9. The fact that Morgan Street, Prescott Street and Nineteenth -12- 0 Street have become important thoroughfares and connect important thoroughfares and the fact that the present condition of the streets, within the limits herein defined, are dangerous to the health and public welfare of the inhabitants thereof creates a public emergency and an imperative public necessity, requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no ordinance or resolution shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction, and that said ordinance shall be read at three (3) several meetings of the City .Council, and the Mayor having declared that such emergency and imperative public necessity exists, and having requested that said Charter rule be suspended, and that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introduction, and that this ordinance take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage, it is so ordained. PA�SSLD AND APPP.OVED this the /day of Noverber, A. D., 1957. k 7T-NST : ,r City Secretary/ -UPPOVIED AS TO L° AL FORM J /•�3/� 7 City Attorne MAYOR City of Corpus Christi, Texas -13- .. a COR" CHRISTI,, TEXAS O .1957 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS GENTLEMEN: FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FORE- GOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLU- TION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: I. THEREFORE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRO- DUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. RESPECTFULLY, MAY R THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTED: PARR D. SMITH V. J. . ROBERTS B. E. SIGLER MANUEL P. MALDONADO. CHARLIE J. AILLS V m ARTHUR R. JAMES ODELL INGLE J C THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FARRELL D. SMITH Y. J. ROBERTS 1 B. E. BIGLER MANUEL P. MALDONADO CHARLIE J. RILLS ARTHUR R.IJAMES ODELL INGLE fq oq