HomeMy WebLinkAbout05305 ORD - 04/01/1959AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING TEE HEARING GIVEN 70 THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ALAMEDA STREET FROM THE SOUTHEAST
BOUNDARY OF DODDRIDGE STREET TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY
OF OSO GOLF COURSE, AVALON STREET FROM THE SOUTHEAST "
BOUNDARY LINE OF EVERHART ROAD TO THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY
LINE OF ALAMEDA STREET, EVERHART ROAD FROM ALAMEDA STREET
TO AVALON STREET, ROBERT DRIVE FROM THIRTY FEET 'SOUTH OF
.THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF AVALON STREET TO FORTY FEET
NORTHEAST OF THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY LINE OF ALAMEDA STREET,
AND AIRLINE ROAD FROM ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FEET NORTH OF THE
CENTERLINE OF ALAMEDA STREET TO ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FEET
SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF ALAMEDA STREET AS TO SPECIAL
BENEFITS TO-ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE
01.MERS THEREOF, BY VIRTUE OF THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND AS TO ANY ERRORS,
AND INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS
OR CONTRACT THEREOF, OVERRULING AND DENYING ALL PROTESTS
AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED, EXCEPT THE CHANGES REFLECTED HEREIN,
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE
PORTIONS OF ALAMEDA STREET, AVALON STREET, EVERHART ROAD,
ROBERT DRIVE AND AIRLINE ROAD, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED,
WILL BE SPECIALLY BENEFITED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS
OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED M
BE AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
PORTIONS OF ALAMEDA STREET, AVALON STREET, EVERHART ROAD,
ROBERT DRIVE AND AIRLINE ROAD, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENTrFOR
THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID
STREETS, WITHIN SAID LIMITS, FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN AGAINST
THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES UPON THE COMSPLETION APED ACCEPTANCE OF
SAID WORK, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND PROVIDING THE
11ANNER APED METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND
CERTIFICATES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,
WHEREAS, the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted ordinance
passed and approved on January 21, 1959, determined the necessity for, and ordered
the improvement of portions of Alameda Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert
Drive and Airline Road within the limits hereinafter defined, in the manner and accord-
ing to the plans and specifications heretofore approved and adopted by the City Council
by ordinance dated January 21, 1959, said portions of said streets to be improved
being as follows, to —wit:
Alameda ;Street from the southeast boundary of Doddridge Street tb.the
northerly boundary of Oso Golf Course, Avalon Street from the south-
east boundary line of Everhart Road to the southwest boundary line
of Alameda Street, Everhart Road from Alameda Street to Avalon Street,
Robert Drive from thirty feet south of the south boundary line of
Avalon Street to forty feet northeast of the northeast boundary line
of Alameda Street and Airline Road from one hundred twenty feet north
of the centerline of Alameda Street to one hundred twenty feet south
of the centerline of Alameda Street;
a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of said City
{
i
�r
with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, after having
advertised for and received,bids on the contraction of said improvements for the
length of time and in the manner and form as required by the Charter of said City
and the laws of the State of Texas, and after having duly and regularly made
appropriation of funds available for such purpose to cover the estimated cost of said
improvements to said City, all as provided by the Corpus Christi City Charter and by
law, did award a contract for the construction of said improvements to Heldenfels
Brothers on its lowest and most advantageous bid and said contract has been heretofore
duly executed by said City of Corpus Christi and Heldenfels Brothers; and is dated
r
December 3, 1958, and the Performance Bond required by said contract has been properly
furnished by said Heldenfels Brothers, and accepted by said City Council of said City
as to form and amount as required by the Charter of said City and the laws of the
State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the Director of Public Works to prepare
and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amount per
front foot proposed to be assessed against the property abutting upon portions of
:Alameda Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, within
the limits herein defined, to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and
said Director of Public Works has heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of
other matters relating thereto with said City Council, and same has been received,
examined and approved by said City Council; and,
WHERKAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated January 21, 1959,
did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that portion of the cost of
constructing said improvements on portions of Alameda'Street, Avalon Street, Everhart
Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by
the abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and did order and set a
hearing to be held at 3 :00 o'clock P.M. on February 11, 1959, in the Council "Chamber
of the City Hall of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property
abutting upon said streets, within the limits above defined, and for all others owning
—2—
or claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property, or any of
said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against each parcel
of abutting property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and as to the
special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue of said improvements,
if any, or concerning any error, invalidity, irregularity or deficiency in any
proceedings, or contract, to appear and be heard in person or by counsel and offer
evidence in reference to said matters; and said City Council did by said ordinance
order and direct the City Secretary to give notice of said hearing to the real and
true owners of the property abutting upon said streets, within the limits defined, by
publication in the Corpus Christi Times, the official newspaper of the City of Corpus
r
Christi, a newspaper published in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, of general
circulation, said notice to be published in said newspaper at least three (3) times
prior to the date of said hearing, the first publication of which to be at least ten
(10) days prior thereto, all as provided for and in accordance with the provisions of
said City Charter and of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the
40th Legislature of the Statelof Texas, known and shown as Article 1105 —b of Vernon's
Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, said City Council did further order and direct said City Secretary, in
addition to said published notice as aforesaid, which was provided to be valid and
sufficient in itself, to include in said notice a list of the apparent owners of said
abutting property as set out in said Director of Public 1Yorks' written report, and
providing that said list of apparent owners and the descriptions of said properties,
so included, shall be cumulative of and in addition to the requirements of said
notice as required by law and shall not be conclusive as to the real and true owners
or the descriptions of said abutting property nor limit said notice to such owners
named, or the properties described, but that said notice shall nevertheless be directed
to the real and true owner or owners of said abutting property, whether named or
correctly named, or said property described or correctly described therein or not; and
WHEREAS, said notice as ordered and directed by said City Council and as
required by said Acts and Charter of said City as above identified, was duly given
publication of same in the Corpus Christi Times, a newspaper published in the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, on January 29, 1959, February 4, 1959, and February 7, 1959,
said notice so published having included therein a list of the apparent owners as set
—3—
r • I �t
t
"L
k�
out in said Director of Public Works' written report as directed in the aforesaid
ordinance; and
11HEREP.S,'after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as provided by
law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing, of which notice
was given, was opened and held on February 11, 1959, at 3 :00 o'clock P.M;, in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accord-
ance with said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all
said above mentioned persons; firms, corporations and estates, their agents and
attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in accordance with
said ordinance and notice, at which time the following appeared and offered the
following testimony:
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MILTON WALTON AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DRAHN
JONES BY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, TESTIFIED IN DETAIL AS TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS AS TO CONSTRUCTION AND THE CITY'S POLICY WHEREBY THE COST OF IM-
PROVEMENTS AT INTERSECTIONS OF STREETS ARE PAID FOR BY THE CITY AND NOT ASSESSED
AGAINST ANY PROPERTY OWNER. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WERE MARKED BY THE CITY
SECRETARY AS "EXHIBIT A° FOR THE RECORD. ALL IMPROVEMENTS ARE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS.
t
—4—
Regular Council Meeting
February 11, 1959
Page m5
Alameda Street is to be a 64' - face to face of curb - 4" hot mix asphalt base and
surface with 11" Lime stablized clay base, paved street. The rate of assessment per
square foot of sidewalks is $0.43665, for concrete driveway is $0.7455, and for curb
and gutter is $1.75725 per linear foot. The residential rate is $5.95530 per front
foot, and $10.96427 for business property for pavement. The residential rate per front
foot is 40% of the,actual contract price for pavement, curb and gutter for a 30' street,
and the amount of assessment is based upon the linear foot improvement times the rate
times 1% for each foot of depth from Alameda Street limited to a maximum of 100' or a
minimum depth of 501. The business rate is 40% of the actual contract price for a,64'
street, and the amount of business assessment is based on the linear feet of improve-
ments times the rate, regardless of depth. The sidewalk amount is 80% of the cost
based on contract price, and the driveway amount is 100%i of the cost.
Avalon Street from Everhart to Alameda is to be the same paving specifications
except it is to be a 30' street, and the same assessment rates as for Alameda excepting
that the business rate per front foot is $5.95530•
Everhart Road from Alameda to Avalon is to have the same paving specifications
except it is to be a 44' street, and the same assessment rates excepting that the busi-
ness rate per front foot is $8.01781.
Robert Drive is a 30' street from 30' south of the south right -of -way line of
Avalon Stree'd to 40' northeast of the northeast right -of -way line of Alameda Street is
to have the same paving specifications and rates except that the business rate per
front foot is $5.9553-
Airline Road from 120' north of the centerline of Alameda Street to 120'
south of the centerline of Alameda Street is to have the same specifications and rates
except it is to be a 44' street, and the business rate per front foot is $8.01781.
The total contract price for the improvements is $524,351.52 of which the
total assessments against private property owners is $235,811.56 and the City's
portion of the contract cost is $288,539.96•
Mr. Fred Quaile and Mr. W. N. Cooper stated their qualifications as real
estate appraisers, and testified to the fact that they had each inspected each of,
the properties involved in the assessment program, and had made other independent
investigations of comparable sales and experiences of property owners on recently
-5-
-6-
Regular Council Meeting r
February 11, 1959
Page #6
improved streets in the City, and testified that in their opinion, each of the
properties would be specially benefited and enhanced in value at least to the
extent of the assessment against each of the properties, with the following ex-
ceptions:
Turner Oil property assessment should be reduced in total by $2,000, due
to the fact that the company was being assessed on three sides, and that
after making such reduction, the property would be specially benefited
and enhanced by at least the amount of the remaining assessment;
T. M. Gannaway property assessment should be reduced by 20% on Lot 1
which is directly across the street from the Turner Oil property, but
that the assessments on Lot 2 and 3 are all right.
The following persons appeared to ask questions about the improvements
and assessments, or to protest against assessment on the basis that all improve-
ments of sidewalks were entirely on City property, or that since they are denied
access to Alameda Street by way of driveway or entrance, they should not be assessed:
J. E. Carroll, Pope Place No. 1, Block 3, Lot 12, asked how credit was
arrived at for existing curb and gutter; his assessment was explained to him;
George L. Richard, Pdpe Place No. 1, Block 7, Lot 14, did not feel there
was any benefit or increase of value to his property;
Delbert Bowen, Pope Place No. 1, Block 11, Lot 15, felt the City in general
should pay for the improvement of the street as the whole City benefits, not the
particular property owner;
Joe C. Tillman, Pope Place No. 2, Block 14, Lot 15, said he had been told
that at the time Pope Place was subdivided money had been put in escrow by the
developers towards payment of this improvement. He was informed that there had been
money put in escrow for park development, but not for street improvements;
Paul W. Kidwell, Pope Place No. 2, Block 14, Lot 14, wanted curb, gutter
and sidewalk to be continuous with no space between curb and sidewalk; and wanted
to know who was going to maintain the City property between the sidewalk and his
property line; and did not feel the property owner should be required to pay for
the increased cost of the street due to higher specifications;
Norman R. McAnally, Pope Place No. 2, Block 15, Lot 15, felt abutting pro-
perty owner should be assessed only for residential street, and City in general
should pay the difference for the arterial street;
Joseph I. Thompson, Pope Place No. 4, Block 22, Lot 11, objected to any
assessment since he is denied access to Alameda for driveway etc.;
Mr. Horne, representing Guaranty Title & Trust Co., Pope Place No. 5
Shopping Center, Lots A, B and C, suggested that the sidewalks, and all of Ever-
hart improvement should be eliminated until such time as it is developed;
Harold Marston, Marston Rental Co., Avalon Place, Block 2, Lots 11, 10
and 9, asked that the sidewalks on his property be deleted as they would be of
no benefit to the property or the public, also delete the Everhart and Avalon
Street improvements at this time for the same reason, and asked for some credit
due to the shape of his property; and submitted a written objection to the assess-
ments as being inequitable;
-6-
Regular Council Meeting
February 11, 1959
Page $7
John Mendelski, Avalon Place, Block 2, Lot E, asked that his sidewalks
be eliminated if any others are deleted;
T. M. Gannaway, Jr., Avalon Place, Block 2, Lots 3, 2 and 1, felt there
was no need, necessity or benefit in the sidewalks or for Everhart or Avalon at
this time;
Z. C. Birnberg, Alameda Park, Block 1, Lot 11, asked that the curb be
put at the edge of the sidewalk so he could continue to have the head -in park-
ing that he now has;
William Shireman, attorney representing Frank Cech, F.B. & E.F. & G.
Tracts, Section 2, Lots 6 & 7, stated that although the City is assuming a 100'
right -of -way in front of his client's property, that there has never been any
conveyance by Mr. Cech, only dedicated right -of -way is 40', and said he did
not believe there can be an assessment against a property for paving a road
where the City does not have the right -of -way;
John H. Cain, Cullen Place No. 3, Block 34, Lot 15;
W. F. Duffard, Lamar Park No. 2, Block 10, Lot 1, objected to the street
assessment, but was strongly in favor of the sidewalks for the safety of the
school children;
Wm. H. Bloch, Lamar Park No. 6, Block 18, Lot 28, objected to the entire
assessment program, and particularly to the sidewalks, on the basis that he did
not want either the additional vehicular traffic speeding past his house, or
pedestrians walking past his windows, and further stated there was an error in
arithmetic of $100.00 in his assessment;
Larry Atkins, representing Betty L. Atkins, Lamar Park No. 6, Block 19,
Lot 1, felt that widening the street was not going to enhance the value of the
property;
0. B. Roquemore, Jr., Lamar Park No. 9, Block 25, Lot 1, felt it was unfair
to assess him for the depth of his property, deny him access to the street by way
of a driveway, and then make him pay for a heavy duty street besides;
The Council questioned the assessment for Carmelite Sisters, W. E. Pope
170.14 Acre Tract, as to whether or not credit had been allowed for existing
sidewalk, curb and gutter, and asked that it be checked;
Leslie Chappell, representing the Lutheran dUrch who has recently bought the
W. R. Reid property, Brookdale, Lot C, submitted a written petition for any
special consideration in reduction of their assessment due to the heavy burden
on a young and struggling congregation, stated that they did not know whether or
not there would be any need for sidewalks in their plans for the Church; and Mr.
Chappell was asked to submit plans to the Council as to what the Church proposes
to build;
Rev. Mark B. Williams, representing St. John's Methodist Church, F.B. & E.F.
& G. Tracts, Section 15, E. 200.06' of Lot 13, submitted a written request for a
substantial reduction in their assessment, and stated that there is a similar
situation with regard to this property as for the Lutheran Church; and they will
also submit proposed plans;
M. G. Frich, Avalon Place, Block 2, Lot C, objected to the paving of Ever-
hart at this time, and requested that his property be paved right up to the build-
ing so he can have drive -in parking in the front of his building;
Ted Anderson, attorney representing himself and others in a line, Alameda
Park, Block 1, Lot 5, presented a plat of the properties with the sidewalks moved
back to the buildings so the rest of the area could be used for parking;
-7-
Regular Council Meeting
February 11, 1959
Page #$
LeRoy Lain, .Chairman of the Safety Committee of Wilson and Hamlin Schools,
urged that the sidewalks be constructed on both sides of the Street for the Safety
of the Children attending the schools and using the community playgrounds in the
area;
Paul Rice, Director of Traffic Engineering, stated that the sidewalks
were definitely needed on both sides of the street for the protection of the foot
traffic connected with the three schools in the area;
A telegram of objection to a sidewalk along his property and to the
sidewalk assessment, was received and noted for A. M. Dampier Jr., Pope Place
No. 1, Block 11, Lot 16;
Requested adjustments and corrections based on requests and objections
by property owners appearing were noted to be considered by the Council in the
final assessments, and to be adjusted and corrected in those cases where the
Council deems it advisable, by subsequent ordinance.
-8-
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties appearing
to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the said
hearing was declared closed; and
WHEREAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony being offered
as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of said abutting
property as compared to mostjof the improvements of said portions of said streets
proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any errors, invalidities or
irregularities, in the proceedings or contract heretofore had in reference to the
improvements of said streets; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special benefits and
enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real and true owner"
or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said improvements "on said
streets, within the limits above defined, and has heard all parties appearing and
offering testimony, together with all protests and objections relative to such
matters and as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities in any of the proceed-
ings and contract for said improvements, and has given a full and fair hearing to
all parties making or desiring to make any such protest, objection, or offer 7
testimony and has fully examined and considered all evidence, matters, objections
and protests offered and based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said
City Council finds that each and every parcel of property abutting upon portions
of Alameda Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, with-
in the limits to be improved as herein defined, will be enhanced in value and specially ._
benefited by the construction of said improvements upon the said streets upon which
said property abuts, in an amount in excess of the amount of the cost of said improve-
ments proposed to be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said parcel
of abutting property, and the'real and true owners thereof, and said City Council did
consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiencies called to its attention
and did find that all proceedings and contracts were proper and in accordance with
the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas, under which these
proceedings were being had, and the proceedings of said City Council heretofore had
with reference to such improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular;
9-
and said City Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments
hereinbelow made and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property on
said portions of Alameda Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and
Airline Road and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable
and did adopt the rule of apportionment set forth below and the division of the
cost of said improvements between said abutting properties, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable, and as producing substantial '
equality considering the benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby, and
that all objections and protests should be overruled and denied: '
NOVY, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for or against
said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners of abutting
property on said streets, within the limits above defined, and to all persons,'firms,
corporations and estates, owning or claiming same or any interest therein, be, and
the same is hereby closed and all protests and objections, whether specificially
mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are hereby overruled and denied.
:SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon the
evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel of property abutting upon Alameda
Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, within the limits
defined, that the special benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property
and the real and true owner or owners thereof, by virtue of the construction of said
improvements to said portions of said streets upon which said property abuts, will
be in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements as proposed to be, and
as herein assessed against said abutting property and the real and true owners there-
of, and finds that the apportionment of the cost of said improvements, and that all
assessments hereinbelow made are just and equitable and produce substantial
equality considering the benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, ana are
In accordance with the laws of the ,State of Texas, and the Charter provision of the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore had
M
with reference to said improvements are in all respects regular, proper and valid,
and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens against said '
abutting properties, as hereinabove described and the personal liability of the
real and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or correctly named'herein or
not, have been in all things regularly had and performed in compliance with the law,
Charter provisions and proceedings of the said City Council.
,SECTIW 3. That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted by said City
Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of. Alameda;Street, Avalon�Street,
Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, within the limits hereinabove defined,
and in pursuance of said proceedings heretofore had and enacted by said City Council
in reference to said improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City
with respect to said street improvements by the laws of the State of Texas and the
Charter of said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the
First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as
Article 1105 —b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, there shall
be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective parcels of
property abutting upon said portions of said streets, and against the real and true
owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners be named or correctly
named herein or not, the several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized
opposite the description of the respective parcels of said property, the' number of
front feet of each and the several amounts assessed against same and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, and names of the apparent owners thereof, all as corrected
and adjusted by said City Council, being as follows, to —wit:
.i
%s
z�
No.
1l
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LO
FINAL MMMMM PAVING ASSESSMENT Page 1
Southwest Side Alameda From Doddridge to North Boundary Line of Oso Golf Course
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4° Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized BELDENFIIS BROS. CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT DATE _December 3, 1958 clay base ace to ace of Cur ROADWAY
Not including sidevalk7r driveways)
CONSTRUCTION COST $ 5.95530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
(R -1 - ft -2)
Assessment for - Curb & Gutter per Lineal Foot 1.75725 $10.96427 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0-73-675 (Other than R -1 & R -2)
Assessment for - Concrete Driveway per Square 11'0.7755- BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIRM.
LEKGT
I TYPE
OWNER-
IT. OF
RATE
PAVING &
WALK
WALK
RIVE
RIVEWAY
FOR EXIS
TOTAL
1 PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
B
ABUT.
OF
SBIP
OV-
CMG
CIURG &
SQ.
ASSESS-
WAY
SES
ING
ASSESSMENT
NO.
.NO.
PROP,
ONING
FRCM STJ49NTS
FABLE
GUM
FT.
MENTS
SQ•FT.
C & G
D 0
D D B
I D
G E
Agnes, Pope, Haynes
Pope Place No.l
A
112
114
B=1
114
114
l00%
1249.93
a•
200.33
1049.60
•Agaes,Pope,Haynes
Pope Place No.l
A
286
B -1
100/
286
100%
3135.78
1144
499.53
-1
3635-31'
•J. E. Carroll
Pope Place No. 1
3
12
120
R -2
75
120
759
535.98
480
209.59
158.15
5$7.42
D E L
A I
E
A. B. McKenzie
Pope Place No. 1
7
13
117.5,R-1
75
117.5
75%
523,*
470
205.23
-
154.86
575-]_8,
George L. Richard, a
Pared ,. Bahs
ux.
Pope Place No. 1
7
14
117.5
R -1
75
1.7.5
75%
524.81
470
205.23
-
-
154.86
575.18
P L
Guy J. Brown
Pope Place No. 1
8
13
117.5
R -1
_75
1.7.5
75%
524.81
470
205.23
-
-
154.86
575.18
hh�e
@&11Gs A'V9C9
pe Place No. 1
8
14
117.5
R J-
75
117.5
75%
524.81
470
205.23
-
154.86
575.18
C
A. T A
L I
A
P L A
E
Delbert Bowen
Pope Place No. 1
11
15
117.5
R -7-
75
117.5
75%
524.81
470
205.23
-
154.86
575.18
A. M. Dampier,Jr.
Pope Place No. 1 '
11
16
117.5
R -1
75 '
117.5
75%
524.81
470
205.23
-
-
154.86-
575.18
P
E EX
M A
N P
J. C. White
Pope Place No. 2
1z
15
119.0
R -1
75
119•
75%
531°92
476.36
208.00
_
156,95
582.97
f
3
3
i
.L IMM
P0.
:! T
f �-
1.�
l7
•/8
!9
.4
7_0
FINAL EBMMDMW PAVING ASSESSMENT Page 2
Southwest Side Alameda from Doddridge to North Boundary Line of Oso Golf Course
TYPE OF PANIZE T 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11". lime stabilized clay base ELS BROS, CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT BATE Dec emher 3�}1�ace to ace Curb ROADWAY
SESSENT A AND GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways)
5 -95530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 1.75725 (R -1 - R -2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot _ . 3 5 $10.96427 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per square Ft. g5 (Other than R -1 and R -0
P-74
BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDTH.
B7iC.
Gill
TYPE
OWNER-
FT. 6F
RATES
PAVING &
IDEWAIK
_
DRIVEWAY
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
NO.
0,
ABUT.
OF
SHIP
OV-
G
CURB &
SEES.
WAY
ASSESS_
ASSESSMENT
PROP.
ONING
FROM STMENTS
ABLE
GUTTER
3Q.FT.
MFSM
SQ.,FT.
MENT
Laura C. Davidson
Gor&" -Gr- tr.
Pope Place No. 2
12
16
123
R -1
75
123
75%
549.38
492
214.83
-
764.21
P
S A
D E
'-J'oe C. Tillman
Pope Place No, 2
14
15
123
R -1
75
123
759
54938
492
214.83
-
764.21
'34ark Pomerantz
Pope Place No. 2
14
16
123
R -1
-78
123
78%
571.35
492
214.83
_
786.18
S
A N
T A 11,0
N
I C
Paul W. Kindwell, et
Wt�:.iysixif SF.
Pope Place No. 2
15
14
1 123
R -1
78
123
789
571.35
492
214.83
_
786.18
Norman R. McAnally
Pope Place No. 2
15
15
123
R-1
75
123
75%
549.38
492
21463
764.21
B E
R .M
J D
William P. Hicks
Pope Place No. 2
-16
13
123
R_1
80
123
80%
586.00
492
214.83
800.83
Perry M. McKinnan
Pope Place No. 2
16
14
123
R -1
78
123
1 78%
571.35
492
214,83
786.18
W
L
A
Gerald A. Lutz
Pope Pl.gce No. 2
17
10111P3
R -1
75
123
75%
549.38
492
214.83
_
764.21
Edwin G. Danten
Pope Place No. 3
17
14
120.2
R-1
80
120.2
86%
572.66
480.80.
'209.94
e
782.60
D R
I F T
W O
D
P
E. B. Groner I
Pope Place No. 3
18
12
120.2
R -1
80
120.
572.66
480.80
209.94
-
782.60
•S'
N
�f
••4
2'
z
z
FINAL MEMXRMW PAVING ASSESSMENT Page - '3'-�-
SOUTHWEST SIDE ALAMEDA FROM DODDRIDGE TO NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF DSO GOLF COURSE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base HELDENFELS EROS, CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT DATE December 3,'1226 641 Face to Face )of Curb ROADWAY
r ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways)
$ 5.95530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb & Gutter per Lineal Foot 1.7572 ( R -1 - R -2)
essmerrt for Sidewalk-p'er ScipaTe Foot 5 $10.96427 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0. 5 (Other than R -1 and R -2)
$ASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDM.
Depth
Lin.
6 Pav&ssessment
DEI
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION`
Block
Lot
re3pttb
Type
Owner-
t. of
Rate
Paving and
Sidew
Sidewalk
rive-
riveway
TOTAL
No.
No.
Abut.
of
ship
prove-
-
Curb and
Sq,'Ft.
Assess -
way
sess-
ASSESSMENT-
Prop.
tYom St.
meats
able
Gutter
'went
Sq.Ft.
went
L
Richard H. Godeke
Pope Place No. 3
IB
13n
120.2
R -1
80
120.2
0%
572.66
480.80
209.94
782.60
DOLPHIN
L A
E
. M. Currie
Pope Place Nq. 3
19
11
121.3
R -1
80
121.3
0%
577.90
48p.20
211.86
789.76
3
bby D. Horton
Pope Place N9. 3
19
12`
120.2
R -1
80
120.2
0%
572.66
- 48q.8o
209.94
782.60
-
A C
- - -
J D A
- -
P L
-
A C E
- - -
+
Thomas PSI Meehan, etl
e -;%L- Z-Ivkland
K.
Pope Place Igo. 4
20
10
0.2
R -1
82.75
120.2
2.75
592.35
484.80
209.94
802.29
i
Richard W. Kincaid
Pope Place No. 4
20 Ill
1.20.2
R -1
82.75
120.2
2.75
592.35
480.80
209.94
802.29
i
C 0 R
L
LA
E
1es J. Morahan
Pope P1aGe No. 4
21
10
120.2
R -1
82.75
120.2
.75
592.35
4po.80
209.94
802.29
I. V. Ainsworth, et
Pope Place No.
21
11
120.2
R -1
82.75
120.2
-75
592.35
480.80
209.94
802.29
MIRA
AR
PL
C,E
Ralph R. Holeman
3
H=._gebb
Pope Oiace No. 4
22
10
121
R -1
82,75
121
°75
596.29
484
211.34
807.63
Joseph I. 2hom ,pson, y
etur,.
A _
Pope Place No. 4
22
it
120.
R-1
82.75
120.75
.75
595.06
483
210.90
805.96
ARM
L
P L
C E
orpus Christi
Ac. Tract
290
R -1
100
290
100%
1727,04
60
506.51
2233.55
4
ITE]
N Q.
32
-13
14
-75
39
4_4
f'FiffAL j PAVM ASSESEMM 4
SOUTHWEST SIDE ALAMEDA,F4 DODDRIDGE -TO NORTH _W== 1419,E QF OSO GOLF COMM
TYPE OF P&vmw 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with Ill ]rime stab;LLIZJ4d clay. bate -CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT DATE Dec. 3'. 1958 ace to see of Curb- kOAPVAY
RAM PA MMU AIM CURB AND G
CONSMUCTIOlf COST (Not including sidewalk or drive�ys)
�O Res Per Front Foot
5.45 Residential Rate F
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per nds' Foot R-1 - R,2 )
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 19.43655 $10.96427 Business Rate Per Front«Toort
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. J0.7455 (Other than R-I and R-4
BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIM
I-gffi
Type
Depth
Lin.
6 Pay.
6apammt
PROPEM,owkm
NAM OF ADDITION
Rock
Lot
Abut.
-of
Owner-
Xt. of-late
Paving And
Sidevall
Sidemilk -
Drive-
-Driveway
TOTAL
No.
No.
Prop.;
ship
1wfflmRe
Curb and
Sq.n.
AswPs-
way-
Assess-
ABS1500AT
2ww-
firom St.
meats
abIw
Gutter
si t
sq. f'6.
meat
Pope Mace No. 5
. G=wty We& Trust,*
Shop-ping Center
A'
229X
B-1
200
229.14
122t
2212-35
916 5�
400.2a
29]2, _7
-Jaek-Pepe -Estate;
Pope Place NO-5
9gM2AMt1e& Trus tr
Shapping Center
B
1 60
1 B-I
200
1 601
l00%
65T.W
240
1 I04.80
Xaels albe,tr.
Pope Place No. 5
_762,966
Guaranty Title & Trust
ELO Center
C
14`
150
14
.82
5BO
_*_1.26
- 1
: P E R
I ART
R 0
Marston Rental Co.
Avalon Place
2
11
1U.-PI-B-1
135
IU.78
100%
IM.59'
307.12
134.10,
5p2
441.34
1801-03
Marston Rental Co.
Avalon Place
2
1 10
50
B-I
135
50
100%
%8.0-
200
-87.33
635_54
Marston Re=6i%I Co.
Ave-Ion Place
2
9
50
B-1
135
50
1"
548.21
200
'87.33
635.54
C. T. Blasing=e
Avalon Place
2
8
50-
B-I
135
50
100%-
5!48.21
200
87-33
635.54
C. T. Blasingame
Avalon Place
2
7
.50
B,31
135
50
100%
548.21-
200
87-331
635-54
Y. R. and
Avalon Place
2
6
5o
B-1
135
/50
1100%
548.P-1
60
-26.20
522
441.34
1015.75
Avalon Place
2
„5
50
B -1
50,.
104
548.21
200
87433
635.54
Sam Ferris, Sr.
Avalon
2
-4.
50-
B-I
135
50
10
%8-21'
-200
87-33
635-54
T.M. Gannavay, Jr.
.-Place
Avalon Place
2
3
50'_
B-I
135
50
100%
548.21
60
--26.20
592
441.34
1015 -75
M. Gailm-day, jr.
on Place
2
S
50-
B-1
135
50
100%
5wel-
200
87.33
635-54
T.M.. Gannavey, Jr.
rA:va:LIoA Place
2
L
100
B-111
135
00
1
1o96.43 -400
174.66
LP.A,-.A 9
Id
w
19
N�
4-5
46
47
,48
49
,'4
si
s?
Page 5
k'nM EXUaMCOMPAVING Asamauw -
Southwest Side Alameda From .Doddredge to North Boundary Line of Oso Golf Course
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base =ENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT_1kTE Dece 4� 11158 3 64 r lace, to lWce of turb OADWAY
AS A VR-M MM-CTT= GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways)
5.25530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 1.7 725 (R -1 - R -2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0.43b65 io.26427 Business Rate Per front Foot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0.7455 AOther STREET WIDTH R -2){'
BASED ON 64
ength
Type
Depth
bin.
Pa
. Assessmen
Drive-
Creflit
.
Property Owner
Name of Addition
Bloc
of
but.
of
Owner
Ft. of
Rate
Paving andSidewal1
Sidewalk
way
Driveway
isting
Total
No.
No.
Prop.
oning
ship
prov-
Charg
- Curb &
Sq. n,
ssessmen
Assess-
Curb
Assessment
from S
.meats
able
Gutter
Sq.3t.
ment
& Gutter
Turner oil Co.
Avalon Place
1
A11
4,73
B -1
1 77
2i4.73
100%i
2354.36
578.92
252.79
1192
888.64
2,337.7$
Z. C. Birnbert
Alameda Park
1
11
57.0
B -1
117
57.01
i00%
625.07
228,04
9957
-
724,64
A. J. Neff
Windsor Park 1
1
1
00.15
B -1
180
100.15
100%
1098,07
280.60
122.52
516.
384.68
1605.27
GJit.Y-, -Ba ylton
Windsor Park 1
1
1
00.1
B -1
180
100.13
100%
1097.85
400.52
174.89
-
-
1272.74
Fred Jones
Windsor Park 1
1
1 -C
1625
B-1
180
162.5
l00%
1781.69
490
213.96
692
515.89
2511.54
outh xas
Service Sta.Corp.
J#indsor Park 1
1
1
180
B -1
180
180
100%i
1973.57
112
1+8.90
1132
843.9
316.30
2550.oB
W. J. Roberts
Windsor Park 1
1
1
90.7
B -1
180
90.70
100%
994.46
102.80
44.89
1117
832.7
1872.07
H A
R D
R I V
E'
24agnolia Pet.Co.
Windsor Park 1
9
1
43.9
B -1
180
143.15
100%
1549.54
40
17.47
1482
lio4-33
2691.34
I
C. Ind.schp Dist.
Part or ec.
& Encinal Farm & 0
o
3,rden
tra
s 397
R -1
775.7
397.0
100%.
2364.25
1488"
649.74
457
_ 340 - 69
3354.68
S
E R
I D A
N
D R I V
E
* Re
acea per
otmcil
ction
. FID
30.
54
55
56:
58
59
60
61�=
FINAL MU=M= PAV32IG ASSESSMENT Page' 6
Southwest Side Alameda from Doddridge to. North Boundary Line -o"so -Golf Course
TYPE OF TAVENT 4 ". got Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base - - - j HELD�NFESL BROS. CONTRACTOR
F
CONTRACT DATE --December 3, 195 „ moo ace of Curb ROADWAY
ASO PAVEMENT AND. CM & GVPLER
CONSi8VLMON COST (Not *.eluding sidewalk or- driveways)
$ 5.95530 Residentail Rate P.e; Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot $1.75725 (x -1 - R-2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 3 5 �lA. 642�� ss Rate Per Front Foot
Othe�
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. .-775 5 than R -1 and R -2)
BASER ON !-644,w OF STFMT WIDTH.
Depth
Lin.
%'ay.
Assessment
Side
Sidewalk
Drive"
Drivw.W
Length
Owner-
ft. of.
Rate
Paving & -,
walk
Assess-
way
tiA.sltBSz
Total Assessment
, Property Owner
flame of Addition
Blk
of
but.
of
ship
Improv-
Curb &'
Sq. Ft
apnt.'
Sq.Ft.
meat
No,
No.
Prop.
Zanim
from St
ments
able.
Gutter'
VIMET ark
.
-
Windscr Park No.2
32
1
176.
R -i
loo j
116.5
1 •
693-70
446 •
w3.49
.2
Jack L. Nixon
Windsor Park No -3
12
40 .116.5
R -1
64.5
il& 5
64.5%
447.49
.446
203 +8'
-
- .
650.97
C
-AS
DR IV
-
erman J., Rowe-
X•. -Rowe
Windsor Park No.3
13
1
116.5
R -1
64.5-
<5
-5
__!L41.42
446
203-48
656.
'Norman L. Ranggly
Windsor Park No.4
13
4o
116.5
R -i
- 64.5
116.5
64.5%
447.49
446
203.48
-•
650.97
P
NNI
G
L N D R I
E
Joe E. Brockett Jr.
Windsor Park Ho-3
16
1
316.5
R -i
64.5
W.5
64.5
,447.49
446
203.48
-
-
650.97
Frank Cech
F.B.&E.F.8aG.Tract
t'
7
0
R -1
100
00.33
100
7743.86
5121.32
22 6.22
346
257:9++
S--10 238.02
- IRLINE
R'OA
4
Eta_1
C taWstie la#ai,3Jid Co•
Cullen Place
B
-
206
B-1
100
206
100%
2258.64
680
296.92
1202
896.09
3, 51.65
-MW Warren et al
Cullen Place.
A.
-
157+8
B-1
'1100'
5.4
3959.01
1261.92
551.02
4 410.03
Pe t Homes In
&E.F.&G.Tract
1
l
Rr].
$100'
1413. 3
loo
843.6.80
5653.32
2468:52
10,885-32
P
8
-
E V EIR
GREEN'DR
i
3
r
z
N0.
65.
C6
67
68
6;9
70
71
FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 7
i SOUTHWEST- - ME ALAMEDA -FROM DODDRIDGE TO NORTff BOUNDARY LINE OF OSO GOLF COURSE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base & Surface with 11' lime stabilized clay base HESDENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT DATE 'December �, 7958 64' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
6ONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways)
5.95530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb & Gutter per Lineal Foot 1, 72 '.,j. ( R -1 - R -2)
0
Assessment for Sidewalk-per Square Foot , 5 $10.96427 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per.Square Ft. -'� 55 (Other than R -1 and R-?)
BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDTH.
ength
Type
Depth
Lin.
% Pav
Assessment
'
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
3lock
Lot
%but.
of
r-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and
*5mlk
Sidewalk
Drive-
Driveway
TOTAL
No.
No.
Prop.
kning
ship
Improve-
Charge
Curb and
Pq.Ft.
Assess-
way
Assess-
;ASSESSMENT
from St
ments '
able
Gutter
went
Sq.Ft.
ment
F I
I F I
EL'D'
DR
IV ,E
Permanent Homes, Inc.
Cullen Pace No. 3
32
12
35
1 R -1
1 87,50
135
7.5
703.47
540
235.79
r'
939.26
ermanent Homes, Inc.
Cullen Place No- 3
32
13
35
R -1
87 -050
135.
87-501
703.47
540
235.79
939.26
GREEN
W AY
DRIVE
Permanent Homes, Inc.
Cullen Place No. 3
33
13
35
R -1
80
135'
0%
643.1¢
540
235.79
878.97
Harley G. Olive
Cullen Place No. 3
33
14
35
R -1
83.70
135
83.70
6729,2
540
235.79
t
908.71
H A
D O V
R
R I V E
John H. Cain
Cullen Place No. 3
34
15
35
R -1
80
135
0%
645'.18
540
235.79
878.97
,Lindale Inc.
Parade Place
1
16
35.03
R -1
83.54
135-03183-544
671.78
540.12
235.84
907.62
A R A
D E
ID R I
V E
Lindale Inc.
Parade Place
2
16
34.46
R -1
86.50
134.46
86.501
692.65
537.84
234.85
927.50
1
t;
Y'�EP
hlO.
• �z
73
74
75
76.
77
78
79
AM
FIUL MMXMMM PAVING ASSESSMENT 8
NORT11EAST SIDE ALAMEDA FROM DODDR=E TO NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSO GOLF COURSE -
11ELDENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 12' lime stabilized clay base Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
CONTRACT DATE December '4- 19.58 =50T PAM PAVM= „CURB .AMID , &UTTER
(Not including sidewalk or driv ays)
�5. 53 CONSTRUCTION COST %� 0 Residential Rate -Zer Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 10772 $10.9642 t 7 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot (Other than R -1 sad -
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. C 5 BA=) ON 64 FEET-9F STREET., FROTH.
e
To
Depth
Lin.t
Pav
Assessment
Sidewalk
Credit
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
Block
Lot
butte.
Owner-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and
fide
Drive-
Driveway
for Ex_
ASSESSMENT
No.
No,
Prop
ship
Improv-
ChaxW
Curb and
Assess-
way
Assess-
fisting
from St
meats
able.
Gutter
Sq..Ft.
ment.
Sq. It
ment
C.& G.
D 0 D D
R I D
G E ST.
W. R. Reid
Lamar Park No. 1
A
1 0
B -1
1
190
1100t
208R.21
__
--
--
-_
1749.11
Lamar Park Dev. Co.
W, R; Reid
Area
295
B -1
-_
__
518.39
2716.o7
Richard L. Hudson
" I`
1
1
120
R -1
115
120
10
4,64
D E L
A I N
E D R I V
E
D. V. Co us
" t` n '"
1 1
130
R -1
102.74
130
100%
771+.19
I 40
17.47
274,
2o4.27
995.91
-. C0'' at$on
Lamar Park No. 2
-6
6
26
130
R -1
126.24
130
10
774.19
456
199.3a
0
G A
N T
P L A C E
L.H. & R.J. Seaman
1
130
R -1
115.68
13o
loot
774.19
444
191.87
Fred Heffington'
" "
7
28
I-
10
R -1
1 102.8
110
10
4.ig
C j.
T A L
N A
P L A
W. F. Duffard
" " " "
10
1
130
R -1
107'.9
130
10
19
520
227.o6
__
1001,2
1100%]
LE. Strand
"
10
28
130
R -1
103.48
130
774.19
457.6
199.81
266.2
198.45
1172.45
1
.11M
NO.
83
84
85
86
87
38
89
90
9-
FINAL 130MMM PAVING ASSESSMENT 9
NORTHEASE SIDE ALAMEDA FROM DODDRIDGE TO NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF,OSO GOLF'COURSE
uFLDENFE ,S EROS. CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix -As is Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base Face to ace ur ROADWAY
CONTRACT DATE , December 3," 1958 ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CUTRB AND GU2"IER
(Not including sidewalk or driveways)
CONSTRUCTION COST 5.95530 Residential Mate Per front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 1. 5 'Business R e e 2)
$10.96427 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0.
(Other than R -1 and R -2)
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0,7 BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDTH, r
Depth
av
sessmen
Type'
Owner-
Ft, Of
Rate
Paving and
Sidecars
Sidewalk
Drive
Driveway
TOTAL
loc
Lo
but,
of
ship
Improv
Ch
Curb and
Assess-
way
Assess-
ASSESSMENT
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
No
No
rop.
o
rom St
ments
able
Gutter
Sq. Ft
meat.
Sq.ft
went
Frank B. & a ys
Bush Coughlin
Lamar Park No. 3
11
28
125
R -1
103.40
125
100L
744,41
420
183.39
341
254.22
1182.02 -
PA
A D E
_A PLACE
mas F.
'Fits erald
" i' " "
14
1
12
R -1
195
412
L79-90
375
279-56
1158.91
Gene C. Crane
Lamar rk No. 4
14
28
125
R -i
3.34
12
694.83
458.8
200.4
176.1
131.28
1026.4
SANTA
MON
+I
CA PL AIC
E
E. A. Williford
"
15
1
125
1 R -1
1 98.96
125,
98.96
736.67
500
218.33
-
955.00
J. D. Tolle
Lamar Park No.
15
28
125
R -1
112.24
125
100%
744.41
500
218.33
-
962.74
BE I
t MUD
L PLACE
Elmer L. Bowden
" "
18
__1
125
R -1
84.49
125
84.44
628.95
500
1 218.33
-
847.28
Wm.H. Bloch
Lamar Park No, 6
18
28
120
R -1
93.26
120
g3'2
0 666.47
480
209.59
6.06
W I
I L I A
I S 0
4 PI A C
Betty L. Atkins
19
1
12
R -1
88.21
1-25
88.21
6 6.64
00
218.
874-97
Allen Wood
Lamar Park No, 7
1
29
134
R -1
96.181
1 4
96.18
6 767.53
6
234.o4
1001.5
D 0 1,
P H I
I P L
A C E
Geo. L & Gussip
MacLeod
rr rr n n
-
11
1
L-
a
93
�F
95
-96
97
98
99'
100
4
101
/ 02A
FINAL AMMMMM PAVING ASSESSMENT 10
M NORTHE_ SE SIDE ALAMEDA FROM DODDRIDGE TO ' NORTH BOUNDARY LIRE' OF OBO GOLF COURSE
HELDENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF PAVEMENT_ 4",H Mix As t Base and Surface with IV' lime stabilized clay base Face to Face Curb ROADWAY
CONTRACT DATE ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GLJThTER
CON$TRU ION COST (Not including sidewalk or driveways)
5x95530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 1. R -1 - R-2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot $o-.43665 $10.96427 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Squart Ft. 0.7 55 (Other than R -1 and R -2) I
BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDT$, -
Depth
Lin.
Pav
•Assessmen
Drive-
Le
Type
Owner-
. of
te•
Paving
Side
Sidewalk
way
Driveway
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER
N!� OF ADDITION
Bloc
Lot
Abut.
of
ship
rov-
arg
Curb and
Assess-
Assess-
ASSESSMENT
No.
No.
Fro
ing
from Et
ents
b e
Gutter
S . Ft
t
s , ft
men
Robert L. Hughes
Lamar Park No. 8
22
2.6
R -1
..2p.2
2..6
0.2
530.4
23j-. 6o
1i1i,28
'ARA
U
IN PLACE
Robert A. Guttman
" " " " -
23
1
32.8
R -1
1. 6
8
1.30
5-30.-32*
2 6
ce Hester
lyln r-Maex+e_
Lamar Park No.
23
2
2
R -1
8
66.8.3
28
0.
0
E
0. W. BOggan
Gap>_- G.. -Maepe
24
1
32
R -1
85
32
85
668.19
528
1 230.55
--
--
898.74
P-4
23
32
R -1
8
2
8W
668.. q
528
210.55
4
IRA
AR
FLAKE
'- '
M. H. Major
255
1
36
R -1
90
L16
901
728.93
44
4
0. B. Rqquemore, Jr.
tt1,a s -A-.-
ft ,- It n
A R M
E L
L A C E
City of
W. E. Pope
Corpus Christi
1 0.14 Ac. T t
-
--
R-1
100,1
79
1004
1 446.65
-Aoo
IR1,00
Carmelite -Sisters
" '! �'
OB-L
A1� R
R'O A D
Landsman Realty Co.
Town & Co
try
A
1 .30
5 6
�q
7,819-95
y
o Center
--
-
B-1
--
1
3 �F,
1$81
1402.2
°
Ada oil Co.-
"
s
_ --
166,79
.1
1,828:IT3
667.16
29 .32'
2.120.05
w'
4-
1
cti
ca
U
U �
9
m'
�t
M
4+
t
N
U
rn ,
o .,
i
•
102
103
104
105
ao6
107
108
log
110
111
112
I.?3
FINAL AMMMO&W PAVING ASSESSMENT
1 NORTHEAST SIDE ALAMEDA FROM DODDRIDGE TO NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF Os0 GOLF COURSE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base HELDENFELS BROS. ?u+ CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT DATE December 3, 1958 641 Face to Face of Curb 5:" ROADWAY
ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB,S�AND GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including sidewalk'Zl� driveways)
5.95530 Residential Rate�Per Front Foot
(R -1 - )
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 1. 25 10. 6427 Business Rate P.es Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per - Square Foot (Other than RTI< and R -2)
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0.7 55 -BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDTH X
Depth
Lin.
%Pay.
Assessment
Sid
Sidewalk
Drive-
Drive,Ta
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
Block
!Legth
Lot
Abut.
Type
of
Owner-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and
Assess-
way
Assess .
TOTAL
No.
No.!
Prop'
Wing
ship
Improv-
curb and
Sq. Ft.
ment.
sq.
ment y`
ASSESSMENT
from St
meats
able.
gutter
11. D. Campbell
Campbell Sub'd.
6 -C
4o.02
B -1
148.58
14o.o2
i00%
1,535.22
56o.o8
244.56
--
-- o^?
1,779.78
.john H. Mattson
Alameda
•W -2
y U
Estates No. 1
2
of 5
81.84
B -1
341
81-841104
897.32
327.36
1 142.94
--
-- '
1 4+0.26
0. 3. Wyatt, Jr.
Alameda
E.
V
a- ife3se
Estates No. 1
2
of
81.84
B -1
15
81.84
10
6
142.94
1, 0.26
Alameda
I
o. S. Wyatt, Jr.
Estates No. 1
2
C 126.16
B -1
p2
126.16
loot
1,383-25
504.64
220.
-
-- ;
1603.60
Alameda
-
0. S. Wyatt, Jr.
Estates No. 1
2
1 B
24.24
B -1
400
124.24
10
O
4Q6. 6
217.00
7-
1.579.20
Alameda
Paul R. Howard
Estates No. 1
2
A
60
R -1
420
12 .60
1
6.08
446.40
194. 92
205
152;&;U
1 o81. 8
e.
.Alameda
I
F.W.1
A. S. Heizer -
Estates No. 1
2
2 -A ;
75.20
R -1
100
75.2
10
1+47.84
300.8
131.34
--
--
.18
Frances Julia West
Alameda
E.2
._
duiia- Francas-West
Estates No. 1
2
2-A t
65.04
R -1
130
65.o4
1
81.33
212.16
92.64
205
152,'8' i
6,42.8o
R. C. Littleton
Estates
1
1 '
50.0
R -1
1G0
150.0
10
893.30
600
261.99
��
1,155.29
ELL
- - -
N
-
R I
E
-
Chas. L. Cgsahe
Alameda
Estates No
1 1
-2 :
40
R -1
270.34
14o
10
833-74
560
244.52
--
--
1,078.26
Alameda
a
;
Mrs. Lul.a Hood
Estates No. 1
1
1
65
R -1
270.4
165
loot
982.62
660
288.1
--
-
1,270.81
Jack Ryyaann Tn�i
Trusee
F.B.& E.F. & G.Tra
is
k''d
Lots 14 & 16
.I
-
00
.20
10
10,190.71
6844.80
88.4
131179-49
.W. R. .Reid
trookdale
C '350
R -1 1390
350 1
100,E
2,084.36
1400
611.31
--
-- -
2,695.67
;: 9
.a
7IEM
No.
115
116
117 ,
118
119
120
i21
1' 22
123
!24
.11
FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT 12
NORTHEAST SIDE ALAMEDA FROM DODDRIDGE TO NORTH BOUNDARY LINE -OF OSO GOLF COURSE
HELDENFELS CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" H"ot -Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base 641 Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
- COITEMCT-DATE - December-3,195d ASSESSMENT.RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION COST (Not .including sidewalk or driveways)
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 1. $..5 ,95530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot 5 (R -1 - R -2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 3 10, 642 Business Rate Ter Front Rot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. $0.7455 (Other than -R -1 and R -2)
BASED ON 64 FEET OF STREET WIDTH°
Depth
Lin.
Pay.
Assessment
Le
Type
Owner-
ft. of
Rate
Paying and
ide
Sidewalk
Drive-
Driveway'
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
-Blocl
Lot
Abut°
of
ship
Improv-
Curb and
Assess -'
way
Assess'
ASSESSMENT
No.
No.
Prop,
onirg
from'St
ments
able.
Gutter
S . Ft
went.
s . ft
ment
Joint Board of
Christian Churches
Brookdale,
A
2 5.
R -1
390
2 75.77
1-00%
1,642.29
1103,
481 °66
°-
-
Tremarco Corp.
Galf -®a -Be
"
B
206.1
B -1'
158
206.16'
1
Lt 260, 39
544.64
2V.82
1202
I 8 6 0
.
A IR -LIN
E
ROAD
i
Brentwood
Humble Oil Corp.
Community Center
1
150
1 B- '.
1 L-150..*
100%.
H. E. Butt �CVroc...Co
Ja, ®k
n ��
0
]2 5
R -1
80
125:
80%,
595.53
500
218.33
-_
--
813.36
-
PAL
MA
RE
t0l
_
o
O
2
R -1
8.48
a
Jack Ryan Trustee
F.B.&E.F.BO. Trans
15
16
696
' R -1 '
100
69&54
1 7
• 0 10 .40•
-`6 86.1
18
Wf13�
1
cR
Guy Warren et al
F.B.&E.F.BG. Tracts
4 ,6L
-1 '
100
4 .61
10
2,594.19
Johns
Methodist Church
F.B.&E,F.BO.Tracts
15 .
of
2ow6
R -1 ,
100
200.06
1,191.42
800.2
.42
1..54o.84
'
PAR
DE.
RIVE
Eda Mary Lee &Ernes
Unit 1
_ .
_ ..- Y _
_ - ,
H -B� M. P oenisch
Montclair No. 2
3
215A9
R -1
7.90 "
:215-
,84
$60.
5.68
1.373 2
_ 4.
M0I.TCL
A
IRDR.I
E
H. Thomas John
Montclair No.2
2 •
41.45
7.90
41.4
14-30
16 .
.40
-
264.7o'
_FfRM
PAVING ASSESSMENT
13
7FAvm@w
SOUTHWEST SIDE AVALON FROM
EVERHART TO ALAMEDA
HELDENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR
• I'YPE DF
-+" ]lot Mix A pbalt Ease and Surface with
11" lime stabilized -clay
base
501 Face
to Face of Curb ROADWAY
'
COITISACT DATE
ear 3, 1956
ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CIM AND GUTTER
=
_
(Not including sidewalk or driveways)
-_ CONSTRUCTION COST
! 5: 0
Residentail Rate Per Front Foot
(R -1 - R�2)
*sessment for Cur-,b and Gutter per Ianeal
Ybot
.75725
45.95550
Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per.Square Foot
0.
5
(Other than R -Land R -2)
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft..
30-7455
BASED ON 30 FEET
OF STREET WIDTH.
Depth
Lin.
Paw
Assessment
Type
Owner-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and :SidevaIRBidewalk
my
Driveway j
TOTAL
JTEM 1
M? DFERTY DOWNER
1QAME OF ADDITION
Block
Lot:
Abut.
of
ship
Smprov-
Q=Se
Curb and
j
Assess-
Assess-
ASSESSMENT
No.
No.
Prop.
V-Ing,
fromBt
ments
able.
Gutter
s . n.
ment,.
s .
ment
Thomas gan
126
Alameda Park
6
i
6o
R -1
130
-60,'
1
357-32
i :228
:56.
--
--
456.88
i
I'llen Bra= 'M I I PT
i
127
6
! 1 ;t
60
R -1 1
130
60,
1 100%
357.32
•296'
,85.:58 I
442.90'-
128
1
Wi713a M. N13]1s
"
;6
3
60
R -1
130.
60.
10
357.32
.196
; '85.58
--
--
442.90
129
;Ynbn Mo� psm
6
4
60
R -1
130'
60
100
357.32
228
99 - - :56
--
--
- 456.88 `
!`•`
:1
I
SAM
STREET
130 '
JIDhn �. iNWTA�
$
i
! .6o
R -1
130'
357.32
� 228
99.56
4 6.88 -
_
131
dames 'T. 1�rBr.
5
:2
� '60,
R Z
130
.60
1 �
357•
I :196
� (85 •'S8 !
.442.90'-
_
II
'
132
his Greer
_
r
5
.3
60
R -i
130
.60
1
357.32
i .196,•
0 :58
442. 0
9
133 j
lee Cc 7:e
"'
'5
!F '
59'
R -1
0
130'
3
'S9
10 0,
351.3 6
,i, 6
! "7
6.8
i T 1 5'
--
428.21
131+ 1
.W aliaa� 13. Wilder'
5 '
:5
66.
1 -1
130 _
(6:-
1'00%.'
393-' 49
1 ;220
96:06
--
--
489;11
q
I
,0 =,
;T I
IV E
135
the Simmons
n
1
'
6'
j
1
{
i
+'.
S =1
:2 6
140 :4
' 44 •
412•:20.
--
j
1 817.65
136
Ted M. Anderson
_�� .... _ n _ _..
B -1
12CA'
1
:4
j ;228
II
) ' 6
{
I
4 .Ol
137
-
"'
i I
.,i
10!
.2So:
B l
120
80:0
i
.l0
N
166, .'66
1 1_,:PO.12
48 .lo
1
.2 156.76
ITEM
NO.
138
/39
140
1�-
142
143
Fes, PAVING ASSESSMENT 14
NGRTHEASE SIDE AVALON FROM EVERHART TO ALAMEDA
BELDE.'NFELS EROS, CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base 30* Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
CONTRACT DATE December 3, 195_ ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
(Not including sidewalk or driveways)
CONSTRUCTION COST $x.2530 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot 5 (R -1 - R2)
$5.95,530 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 5 (Other than R -1 and R-2) '
.Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. $0.7455 RASED ON 30 FT;ET OF STREET WIDTH,
Depth
Lin.
Pav
Assessment
but.
TY.Pe
Owner-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and
Sidewal
Sidewalk
rive-
Drive'
Driveway
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME pF ADDITION.
Bloc
of
Prop*
of
Zoning
ship
Improv -Ch
Curb and
Assess-
Assess-
ASSESSMENT
.
o.
from S:,
merits
able.
Gutter
Sq. Ft.
meat.
sq. ft
ment
M. G. Frieh
Avalon Place
2
C
113.41
B -1
80 -
113.41
10086
675.39
405.64
177.12
109
81:26
933077
•7GZ00MXTed. M. AiVersoft
"
2
1 B
1 55
B -1
162
lOOJ
327.54
220
96.o6
—
421.60
Ralph S. Abell, ttix.
.O qL iee- R, - Wuiagat o
" "
2,
A
55
`B-1
1131,22
55
10
2 4
220
96.06
L. rP. Fritz
" "
2
-A
145.60
B-1
160
3A5.6o
looq�
867.og
522.4
228.11
716
101.19
l.lq6.5q
G
" "
2
l41.0
B=1
103-71
141.12
1
8+0.41
524.48
22g.ol
91
67.84
Turner 011 Co.
1
All
99.5
B -1
74.69
199.51
i00%
1 188.14
658.
287-33
321
239-31
_
.
r
`
`
^'
}
* Red
ed 20 i6
¢
cil act3
d.
ar
I TEA!
NO.
144
145
146
1�7.
M
FINAL MMMM PAVING ASSESSMENT 15
SOUTH - SIDE- EVERHARm RD. FROM ALAM®A TO, AVALON
BELDEMMLS BROS. CONTRACTOR
;.TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with :l" lime stabilized clay base 71f Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
.CONTRACT DATE December 3, 1958 ASSESSMENT PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
'CONSTRUCTION COST _ - (Not including sidewalk or driveways)
$5- ,55,3,0 Residential- Rate-Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter Per Lineal Foot m R-2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 3 5 P� Businesss s R R ate Per Front
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0. 5 (Other than R-1 and R�2)
BASF9 ONE 44 FEET OF STREET WIlYrH
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
Bloc
Lot
No.
e�h
Abut,
Prop,
Type
of
oni!E
Depth
Owner-
ship
from&,
Lin.
ft. of
Improv
ments
Pay.
to
Charg
able.
Assessm
Paving
Curb and
Gutter
Sidewalk
. Ft
$i�lewalk
.Assess-
went,
Drive-
way -
s . ft
Driveway
Assess-
ment
Credit
for Ex-
isting
C.0.
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
Marston Rental Co.
Avalon Place
2
11
141
B -1'
82.
141.1
10
11 .O
64.
246.60
1378-63
Hohn Mendleski
" "
2
1 E
I 104 o3
13-1
1 113.4l
104.0
10
834.09
416.
181.0
1
1 1015.79
Herbert Ease
ft It
2
D
60
B -1
113.1E
60
1
481.0
240
104.80
1 85.87
M% G. Frich
tt
2
C
80
B -1
il: -3x4
-8o ,
iooLfi
641.42
320
139-73
104.80
676.35
A. UAL
N
TREE T
Thomas G. Reagan
Frank- ews-
Alameda Park
6
1
1 17
R -1
60
17
6 4
29-69
-=
0.4
y
ITE2
90.
7.49
150
151
FINAL 23affnanx= PAVING ASSESSMENT 16
NORTH SIDE EVERHART• RD. FROM ALAMEDA TO AVALON -
EELDENFELS EROS. CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF Pm mm 4j1 Hot spphalt Base and Surface with 1111 lime stabilized clay base 71 Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
CONTRACT DATE jjErP�r _ l 958 ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
(Not including sidewalk or driveways
CONSTRUCTION COST $5.955,30 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot $1,75725 ss R = R 2)
$8,O1Z81 Business Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot O. 3 5 (Other than R -1 and R-2)
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. L0.74-55 BASED ON 44 FEET OF STREET WIDTH,
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF {jDDITION
Bloc,
No.
Lot
Lenga
Abut,
Prop,
Type
of
Zoning
Depth
Oimr
ship
from'
Lin.
ft. of
Improv.
ments
Pav,
Rate
r
able
Assessmen
Paving ad
- Curb and
Gutter
SldewalJ
sq., ft,
Sidewalk
Assoss-
ment.
Drive
way
sq. ft
Driveway
Assess-
me-at
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
-sek- mope- =Tr
Pope Pla'cl� No. 5
C
l
1,415.84
11 11 It
D
365
B -1
l00{
365
1 10
2926.50
146o
637.51
°-
--
3,564.ol
_.Tack Ryan Trustee
id°.P P cpe eta
36
1
80
R -1
loo
-80
100
476.42
320
139.73
--
--
616.15
1
TM
tM.
L52
L53
164.
13"5
136
137
14 Page 17
FINAL xOMMMM PAVING ASSESSMENT -
ROBERT DR- FROM 30' SOUTH OF SOUTH R.O.W. LINE OF AVALON ST. TO 40' N.E. of N.E. R.O.W. LINE OF ALAMEDA ST.
TYPE OF PAVEMENT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 11" lime stabilized clay base HELDENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT DATE Dec. 3, 195 30' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER
(Not including sidewalk or driveways)
$5.9553 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Assessment for Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot $1.75725 (R -1 - R -2)
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot $0.43665 $5.9553 Business Rate Per Front Feot
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0.7 5 (Other than R -1 and R -2)
BASED ON 30 FEET OF STREET WIDTH
Depth
Lin.
Pav
Assessment
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
lock
Lot
',ength
Type.
Owner-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
Drive-
Driveway
TOTAL
No
No.
kbut.
of
ship
Improve
Curb and
Sq. Ft.
Assess-
way
Assess-
ASSESSMENT
ro
oni
from St
ments
able
Gutter
ment
S .Ft.
ment
Willard R. Wilder
Alameda Park
5•"
5
-•2
R -1
65
23
65%
89.03
89.03
N, 0. Simmons
Inc.
Alameda Park
1
1
2C'
B -1
1 100/
20
100
119.11
1
11
119.11
AV
AL_
N
TR_ I.E
T
T. M. Jr
Avalon Place
2
1
03.
B -1
100/
103.71
1006
617.62
414.84
j181.14
T
553.0
Turner Oil Co.
Avalon Place
1
All
L07.3c,
B -1
100/
107.38
100%i
639.48
429.52
18755
tam
Country
A L A MI
D A
T R RE
T
Ada Oil Co.
s Shopping
mndaman- Realty -ee .
Center
8
11
B -1
100/
11
100%
65.51_
65.51
A. D. Campbell
Campbell
6 -C
37
B -1
100 k-
37
100
220-35
220.35
Reduced
20
per cou3teil
Ac
ion
Reduced
per
Council
tion
e '
Im
NO.
158
159
1610
•FINAL :PAVING ASSESSMENT .2 Page 18
AIi RD. FROM 120' NORTH •OF'THE CENTERLINE AF ALUMA ST. TO 7203 SOUTH OF THE CFmrrF'RT.INE OF AT-06EDA ST.
-TYPE OF PAVEMOT 4" Hot Mix Asphalt Base and Surface with 71" lime stabilized clay base HEIDEPTLS EROS. CONTRACTOR
"CONTRACT DATE December 3, 195 ' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
ASSESSMENT RATE PAVE= Al® CURB AND GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION COST (Not including .sidewalk or driveways)
$ 5.9553 Residential Rate Per Front Foot
Cost of Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot $1.75725 (R -1 - R -2)
Cost of Sidewalk per Square Foot 7F 35 $ 8.01781 Bus3,ness Rate Per Fret Foot
Cost of Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0.7 55 (Other than R 1 and R �)
BASED ON 1+4 FEET OF STREET WIDTH.
Depth
Ian.
% Pav
Assessment
LengtI
Type
er-
ft. of
Rate
Paving and
Sidealk
Sidewalk
Drive-
Driveway
TOTAL
PROFFI2TY ONIM
NAME OF ADDITION
31ock
Lot
Abut.
of
ship
Improves
Curb and
Sq. Ft.
Assess-
way
llssess-
AS.SFS.SMERT
No.
No,
Prop.
fronSt.
m6nts
able
- Gutter
neat
Sq.Ft.
meat
emarco Corp.
Ga W- .MLZcu:p.
-rookdale
113
--18
B -1
18
100%
14.32 .
1
601
:+48.05
592.37
Humble Oil &
Refining
Brentwood Com-
n enter
1
76
B -3
?6
100%
609.35
601
1i B-05
1,057.40
FrWnk Cech
.B.&E.IF90 Tract
3ec.2
7
43
R-1
300
-+3
100,%
256.08
256:08
Total
Assess
s
2-74,-.951-47
Asse
sea to
Tity .as Pr
:2z,832.20
Tot
Assess
to Pr3v
to Pro
3. Owners
Total Contract
Total Assessments
Private Prop, Owner
'0.
City Portion of Cc
atract Cost
92;
-U -25
3
SECTION 4, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED That in the event the actual frontage of
any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of said improvements
to be greater or less than the number of feet hereinabove stated the assessments herein
set against any such property and against the real and true owner or owners thereof
shall be, and the same are hereby declared to be increased or decreased as the *case
may be, in the proportion which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall bear to the
whole number of front feet of property actually improved in accordance with the front
foot rate of assessment herein adopted, it being the intentions that each parcel of
property and the real and true owner or owners thereof abutting on the portions of
Alameda Street, Avalon ;Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Koad, within
the limits above defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT FOOT RULE OR
PLAN ", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and equitable and
to produce a substantial equality, having in view of the special benefits to be
received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further ordained that upon final
completion anduacceptance of said improvements on said portions of Alameda Street,
Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, all certificates hereinafter
provided for, issued to evidence said assessments against said parcels of property
abutting upon said streets, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be
issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual frontage of said property and
the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said certificate in no case
to exceed the amount herein assessed against such property unless such increasd be
caused by an excess of front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual
cost and such actual number of front feet, if different from the hereinabove shown
in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the Director of Public Works upon completion
of said work on Alameda Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline
Road, and the findings of said Director of Public Vorks shall be final and binding
upon all parties concerned.
SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof assessed
against said parcels of property abutting on the portions of AIRmeda Street, Avalon
Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and Airline Road, within the limits defined, and
the real and true owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or not,
subject to the provisions of Section 4 hereof, together with interest thereon at the
rate of five per cent (5%) per annum with reasonable attorney's fee and all costs
and expenses of collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a firstland
prior lien upon the respective parcels of property, against which same are assessed
from and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit:
January 21, 1959, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true
owner or owners thereof, whether or not such owner or owners be named or correctly
named herein, and that said lien shall be and constitute the first and prior '
enforceable claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and'paramount
lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem taxes;
and that the same so assessed shall be payable as follows, to -wit: in five (5) equal
annual installments, the first of which will be payable on or before twenty (20) days
after the completion of said improvements in the street upon which the respective
property abuts, and acceptance thereof by the said City Council, the fourf(4) remain-
ing installments to be due and payable, respectively, one (1), two (2), three (3),
and four (4) years from and after said date of acceptance, deferred payments to bear
interest from said date of acceptance at the rate of five per cent (57) per annum,
payable annually concurrently with each of said installments; past due installments
of principal and interest to bear interest at the same rate per annum until paid;
provided, however, that any owner of such property shall have the right to pay off the
entire amount of such assessment, or any installment thereof, before maturity, by pay-
ing principal and accrued interest to date of said payment; and provided, further,
that if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or
interest when due, then the entire amount of said assessment upon which such default
is made, shall, at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, be, and become
immediately due and payable and shall be collectible together with reasonable
attorney's fees and all costs and expenses of collection if incurred.
•SECTION 6. That the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall not in any manner
be liable for the payment of any sums hereby validly assessed against any abutting
property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, but Heldenfels Brothers;
shall look solely to such property and the real and true owner or owners thereof,
for the payment of the sums validly assessed against said respective parcels of
property, but said City shall be obligated to furnish Heldenfels Brothers valid
-1}
assessments and assessment certificates and shall exercise all of its lawful powers
and aid in the enforcement and collection of said liens and assessments; and if '
default shall be made in the payment of any of said sums herein assessed against the
said parcels of property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, collection
thereof shall be enforced at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, or their assigns;
either by suit in any Court having jurisdiction or by sale of the property assessed
as nearly as possible in the manner as may be provided by law and Charter in force
in said City for the sale of property for the collection of ad valorem taxes.
SECTION 7. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments, the liens
securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels of property and
the real and true owner or owners thereof „ and the time and terms of payment, and
to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable certificates shall be issued by the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, to Heldenfels Brothers, upon the completion of said improve-
ments in said streets and acceptance thereof by said City Council, which certificates
shall be executed by the Mayor in the name of the City, attested by the City Secretary
with the corporate seal of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts
of said assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon, the
date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements for which the certificate
is issued, and shall contain the names of the apparent true owner or owners as
accurately as possible, and the description of the property assessed by lot and block
number, or front foot thereof, or such other description as may otherwise identify the
same, and if the said property shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so state
the fact shall be sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such property or
in giving the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise invalidate
or impair the assessment levied hereby or the certificate issued in evidence thereof.
That the said certificate shall further provide substantially that if default
shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when due '
then at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, or the holder thereof,
the whole of said assessment evidenced thereby shall at once become due and payable,
and shall be collectible with reasonable attorney's fees and all expenses and costs
of collection, if incurred, and said certificate shall set forth and evidence the
—14—
personal liability of the real and true owners or owner of such property, whether
named or correctly named therein or not, and the lien upon such property, and that
said lien is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles and
charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said improvements
were orilered by said City Council, to—wit:-January 21, 1959, and shall provide in
effect that if default shall be made in the payment thereof, the same may be enforced,
at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, or their assigns, by the sale of the property
therein described in the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as'
above recited, or by suit in any Court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all the proceedings
with reference to making said improvements have been regularly had in compliance with
the law and Charter in force in said City and the proceedings of said City Council
of said City, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against
the property therein described, or attempted to be described, and the personal
liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, evidenced by such certificates,
have been regularly done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the
matters and facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be required in any
Court.
That all said certificates may have coupons attached thereto in evidence of each
or any of the several installments thereof, which may be signed with the facsimile
signatures of the Mayor and City Secretary.
That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, when requested so to do
by the holder of said certificates, to aid in the enforcement and collection thereof,
and said certificates may contain other and further recitals pertinent and appropriate
thereto. It shall not be necessary that said certificates shall be in the exact
form as above set forth, but the substance and effect thereof shall suffice.
;SECTIOM 8. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability and charge
against the real and true owner or owners of the property described, or attempted to
be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not be named or correctly
named, and any irregularity in the name of the property owner, or the description of
any property or the amount of any assessment, or in any other matter or th1hg shall
not in anywise invalidate or impair any assessment levied hereby or any certificate
issued, and such mistake, or error, invalidity or irregularity whether in such
assessment or in the certificate issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not
required to be, to be enforceable, corrected at any time by the said City Council of
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Further that the omission of said improvements
in front of any part or parcel of property abutting upon portions of Alameda Street,
Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert Drive and .Airline Road, which is exempt from
the lien of said assessment, shall in no wise effect or impair the validity of
assessments against the other parcels of property abutting upon said streets; and
that the total amounts assessed against the respective parcels of property abutting
upon said streets, within the limits herein defined,-and the real and true owner or
owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the estimate of said assessment prepared
by the Director of Public Works and approved and adopted by said City Council and are
in accordance with the proceedings of said City Council relative to said improvements
and assessments therefor, and with the terms, powers and provisions of said Chapter
106 of the Acts of the First - Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of
Texas, known as Article 1105 -b of Vernon's Annotated Civil ,Statutes of Texas and
the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under which terms, powers and
provisions said proceedings, said improvements and assessments were had and made by
said City Council.
SECTION 9. The fact that Alameda Street, Avalon Street, Everhart Road, Robert
Drive and Airline Road have become important thoroughfares and connect important
thoroughfares and the fact that the present condition of the streets, within the
limits herein defined, are dangerous to the health and public welfare of the
inhabitants thereof creates a public emergency and an imperative public necessity,'
requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no ordinance or resolution 'shall'
be passed finally on the date of its introduction, and that said ordinance shall be
read at three (3) several meetings of the City Council, and the Mayor having declared
that such emergency and imperative public necessity exists, and having requested
_36 _
that said Charter rule be suspended, and that this ordinance be passed finally on
the date of its introduction, and that this ordinance take effect and be in'full
force and effect from and after its passage, it is so o ained,
t
PISSED AND APPROVED this the day of � A. D„ 1959.
3ATTEST:
i Zit
City ecret ryy
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM THIS
THE DAY OF APRIL, 1959:
CITY ATTORNEY
MAYOR
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
-17
CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS
t
1959
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
GENTLEMEN:
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN
THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE
FOREGOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY
AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST
FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE
OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE
SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT
IS INTRODUCED1 AND THAT SUCH
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL; 11 THEREFORE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT
YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE
OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE
FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRO -
DUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLY,
MAYOR
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FARRELL D. SMITH
I W. J. ROBERTS
t
B. E. BIGLER
MANUEL P. MALDONADO
f
CHARLIE J. AILLS
/
ARTHUR R. JAMES
✓�_p
ODELL INGLE
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FARRELL D. SMITH
W. J. ROBERTS
/
B. E. BIGLER
MANUEL P. MALDONADO
CHARLIE J. AILLS
ARTHUR R. JAMES
f�--
ODELL INGLE