Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05337 ORD - 04/29/1959r AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5146 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 27th DAY OF AUGUST, 1958, BY AMEND- ING SECTION 3 OF SAID ORDINANCE CORRECTING AND ADJUSTING THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS ON A PORTION OF LIPAN STREET FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF NINETEENTH STREET TO THE CENTER -LINE OF PALM DRIVE, UP RIVER ROAD FROM THE CENTER LINE OF PALM DRIVE TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD, AND UP RIVER ROAD FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD TO THE 'SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY #9; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, SECTION 1. That Section 3 of Ordinance No. 5146, passed and approved by the City Council on the 27th day of August, 1958, is hereby amended and said Section 3 of said ordinance shall hereafter read as follows, to —wit: "SECTION 3. That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted, by said City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvement of Lipan Street from- the Westerly boundary line of Nineteenth; Street to the center line of Palm Drive, Up River Road from the center line Of Palm Drive to the easterly boundary line of Old Robstown Road and Up River Road from the westerly boundary line of Old Robstown Road-to the Southerly boundary line of Texas State Highway #9, and in pursuance of said proceedings heretofore had and enacted by said City Council in reference to said improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to said street improvements by the Laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as Article 1105 —B of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, there shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon said portion of said streets, and against the real and true owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners be named or correct- ly named herein or not, the several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels of said property, the number of front feet of each and the several amounts assessed against same and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and the names of the apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted by said City Council, being as follows, to -wit: Sheet - 1 ` AME10ED FMA. PAVING ASSESSMENT • NORTH SIDE LIPAN ST[M FROM PALM DRIVE TO OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD -- UNIT 1 6" Caliche Base 3" Hot -Mix ase and BROS. TYPE OF PAVEMW- 1 " Hot*Mix Surface ace to Face—of ROADWAY —' O Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT 'DATE ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER (Not including sidewalk-or driveways) ASSEPSWNT COSTS Residential Rate Per Front Foot (R -1 z Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot $0.36636 $6.31136 Business Rate Per Front Foot ('Other than R-1 and R -2) Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0.69225 BASED ON 40 FEET U STREET WIDTH ngth Type epth Lin. % Pay. Assessment rdt for R NAME OF ADDITIO Bloc Lot Abut. -of .Owner- ft. o Rate Paving and Sidewalk Sidewalk Drive = isting acill— TOTAL ASSES No. No. Prop. Zon ship Improa Charge Curb and Sq. Ft. Assess- way Assess- rom St ments able Gutter men N I N E T E E N T H S T R E E T avin 331. -67 ove- VJ. 02.02 - O 10 .62 100 6 6 .02 2 ankin Tract 60.0 H -1 100 260.0 00 1.81 181 12 0 �OR T VEN E 3 qIyant _Pj ' 2.142.115'.- ,n Rankin 4 en r over Light Company Rankin Tract 50.47 H -1 100 4 441.2 100 2,785.14 1 4x5.8 1 .O 6 5 an roper es Association ankin Tract 4.8 H -1 1A0- 484. 100 060.12 1 847, 6 .8 208 4 Tt P L RIV- :x fiJEM�ED FINAL PAVING ASSMENT Sheet 2 SOUTH SIDE LIPAN STREET FROM 19TH STREET TO PALM DRIVE 6" Caliche Base 3" Hot -Mix Base HELDENFELS 'EROS: CONTRACTOR TYPE OF PAVEMENT and 1j" Hot -Mix Surface 401, Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT ARD CURB "AND (Not including sidewalk or driveways) ASSESSMENT COSTS Residential Rate per Front Foot (R -1 - R -2) Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot $0.36636. $6.31136 iness Rate Per Front Foot Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. $0.6 Other than R -1 and R-2) LengtI Type Depth Lin. % Pav• Assessment Crdt for X PROPERTY OWNER NAME- OF ADDITION Blodk Lot Abut. of Owner. Ft. of Rate Paving and SidewalAILIAevalk Drive Driveway Existing 'TOTAL No. No. Prop. Zoning ship rove Char Curb and sq. ft Assess- way Assess- Facili- SE ASSSMENT from St ments able Gutter ment 9 . -Ft ment ties - N I N E T E E N T H S T R E E 6 Missouri Improve- Pavin6 331.6 me Comany R13nkin Trsnt. :_ 10 H -1 100 ' -058-99, 10ock 6.683.67 8 8 Q 6 - 1.2 1 40. 7 Robt. J. Kleberg&t Rankin Tract 260. H -1 1 100 r 260.11 100 1 0 . 0 l.040. R81,18 3761 -1 72 3 71 _P O IT AVE N U 8 Robt. J. KlebergUt Rankin Tract 296.9 H -1 100 } 287.83 100; 1,816.60 87L 319.28 416.89 _j,,fj .91 and H Properties 9 Association Rankin Tract 1 934.4 H -1 100 # 925.23 100% 5,839-46 3 16. 1.288.46 2 UNIT $22. �.l LLJ t--T I I W AMENDED FINALPAVING ASSESSMENT Sheet 4 NORTH SIDE LIPAN STREET FROM PALM DRIVE TO OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD -- UNIT 2 41" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Conc. Base & TYPE OF PAVEMENT ly" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Cone. Surface - R LDMTF S BROS. CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE 401 Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT COSTS (Not including sidewalk of driveways) 6.49589 Residential Rate per Front Foot Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 6656 (R -1 - R -2) Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. C0.62225 18.23591• Business Rate per Front Foot (other than R -1 and R-2) BqU oN,,40 FEET OF STREET WIDTH Lin' Pay. Assessment Crdt. fo engt Tjpe Depth ft. of Rate Paving and Sidewalk Sidewalk ive� Driveway Existing TOTAL PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION B10 Lot Abut. of Owner- ship fie- Charge. Curb a Sq. Ft. Assess - way Bess- aci3i- ASSESSMENT No. No. Prop. Wing from St ments able Gutter anent.... Sq. Ft went ties 23 Berth U pham Re- Sub.of Lot 6, A. 32' 32 R -1 100• 32 10096 •207.87 9 128 46.89 254.76 4 Berth U liioBarthlome e- .o o , Acre T acts 8 60 R -1 loo} 6o 10 8 -180 65.4 136 94.15 010.84 25 Dr. Pepper Bottling Co rthlome's Acre Tracts 5 0 L -I 1001 120 l0 988.31 1420 153.87 118 81.68 1 223.86 rthlome's Acre 4.1 26 L. A. Felder racts 4 0 R- 27 A. G. Rhodes hlome's Acre cts 60 R -1 100 60 1 240 87.92 4 •:6 28 R.•W. Telford rthlome's Acre r50 0 R -1 100 50 l0 324.79 160 58.62 91 62.99 446.40 D. N. Wri t rthlomes Acre E10 30 R 1 100} 130 100% 844.46 -440 161.29 182 129.98 1,13x.61: L. A. Felder rthlomes Acre E10 o 0 B -1 100 150.78 10It 1,241.81 ?75.1.2 190.79 632 1437.50 1,7$0.19 N U E C E ^ S B A Y B O U L E V A R D 31 Philip Doss Annie Bagnall 0.2.23 224. 8q B- ioo4 224.8 1 1,852.17 4Q9.56 183.9 1 78. 9,54.27 2 989-46 Alley 21.1 21.17 33 C. B9 Rice and 1 B 100; 150 100% 1,235.39 480 175.85; 571 395.27' 1,806..51 Wm er Annie 50 -3 L R 0 STO Ir N I OAD -• "' - l f 4v I d -Sheet' - -5 t AMENDED FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT SOUTH SIDE LIPAN STREET FROM PALM DRIVE TO OLD`ROBSTOWN -ROAD -- UNIT 2 Hot -Mix Asphaltic Cone. Base & TYPE OF PAVEMENT lam" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Conc. Surface HELDENFELS BROS. CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE ' Face to Face -to -Curb ... RQADWAY ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT COSTS (Not including sidewalk or driveways) $6,119589 • - - - - - - Residential Rate Per Front3bot Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot $0.36636 Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 0. b9225 $823591 Business Rate Per Front Foot ( Other than R -1 and- R-2) BASED ON 40 FEET OF STREET WIDTH Depth Lin. % Pay. psessment Crdt for PROPERTY OWNER ' MNE OF ADDITION Block Lot Length Type Owner_ -., ft. of Rate Paving and Sidewalk idewalk Drive Driveway Existing TOTAL No. No. Abut. of ship Charge- Curb and -moo Ft. Assess - Vey Assess-' Pacili. ASSIESSM prop. 50ning from9P. ments able Gutter ment S t. ment ties PAL, DR I V 34F Ha3y+ us Pete s n Tract 987. R -1 100 } 987.27. l00% 6413.20 3845.08 1,408.68 236 163.37 7,985.25 35 Jahn A. c and Rhoda Hatch Peterson Tract 191.5 A -4 100-1 191.52 100 1577.34. 478.08 175. 1� 4 1 6.0 '36' Dr. C. P. Jaspersbn Peterson Tract G 98. 9, R -1 100 ' 98.92 100 642.57 207.66$ --76-09 164 113-53 8 2.l ;QWeA Na r,-ey .•- Peterson (Tract F 143.9 R -1 100 4. 143.95 10 935.08 435.80 150-66 91 62.99 1,10-73 38 R. Morgan Peterson Tract • 146.8 R -1 loo 4 146.80 100% J 953.60 471.20 172.63 263 182.06 1,308.29, 39 W. A. Saunders Peterson Tract 57 R -1 100 4 .'57 1000 370.26 1,72 68.01 91 62.99 496.26 40 Joe w. Johnson Peterson Tract .5 R -1 100 4 164.5 10o% 1068.57 578 = 211-76 181 125.30' 1 405.63 41 wnTy eismaa;.' . 2 1 1 0 R 1 •82.75 3-30 82.75 698.79 520 ° 790.51 WE S T G kTE DRIVE 4R T. B. Gallagher Westgate Height• 1 .l 170. R -1 85 170 8 5% 938.65 249.12 = 425.04 43 Fern L, N`br Dunlap Tract 94.69 R -1 loo , 94.6 loo'% 615.09 32fs.76 119,71 ',118 81.69 816.49 44 A. N: Dart st`.;.` Highland Estate 1 1 64 R -1 100 2, 64 10096 415.74 256 -'= 93.179 •-89:39 42o.14- 45 state 1 . 2 64 R -1 100 64 100 �' 415.74 x-"256 93.79 93:79 415 -74-' L I N G V r E W EST Adjusted to Avpraiwrs ttstimonv °_ * G� c4 %'� +`Q. ar)ejv ':may side wa /!� . w gj AMENDED FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT Sheet 6 SOUTH SIDE LIPAN STREET FROM PALM DRIVE TO OLD ROSBTOWN ROAD -- UNIT 2 44-" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Conc. Base & EELS EROS' CONTRACTOR TYPE 02' PAVEMENT 1,' Hot -Mix Asphaltic Conc. Surface 0' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY CONTRACT DATE ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER (Not including sidewalk or driveways) ASSESSMENT COSTS $6.49589 Residential Rate per Front Foot Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot to. 663 6 (R -1 - R-2) •23591 Business Rate Per Front Foot Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. 225 {Other than R -1 and R-2) BASED ON 40 FEET OF STREET WIDTH NAME OF ADDITIO Block Length Lot Abut. Type of Depth Owner- Lin. . of Pay. to Assessment Paving and Sidewalk Sidewalk Drive- Driveway rdt. for ting% TOTAL PROPERTY OWNER No. No. Prop. Zo ship robe arge- Curb and Sq. Ft. Assess- way Assess- Facili- SESSMENT 46 L. G. Talbert Highland Estate; 2 1&2 145 R -1 100 45 100$ 941.90 520 190.51 136 94.15 190.51 1,0-16-9 47 E. D. Barton Barr Keeler 25 75 R -2 100 10 487.19 4 82.06 1 11 . 68B• 2 48 Ima. Holman Barr Keeler 251-2 �_ 5 R-2 100 10 b8 .1 00 109-94t F I R V E W D R I E 4 100 R -2 1001 00 100% 649.59 344 126.03 127 87.91 863.53 49 W. M. Morgan Barr Keeler 50 Norris Barr Keeler E .80 61.8 B- 1004 61.80 1 508.8 68 24.91 8.08 4 .�1 amble Oil & ° 5 �` O 1145.2o 6 51 Barr Keeler 0 B- LD R 0 B S TO N N ROAD u Orig ntr ct Pr ce 5 Property Owner me $ 71,333 07 o City I . - ' rL'11,.4 1 VS ­­15 �7 Sheet 7 AMENDED FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT SOUTH SIDE LIPAN SR EET FROM OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD TO HIGHWAY NO. 9 -- UNIT .III 44" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Conc. Base & TYPE OF PAVEM T 1�" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Conc. Surface I=DENFELS EROS. CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE 0i Face to Face _of Curb ROADWAY ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT COSTS (Not including sidewalk or driveways) $6.49589 Residential Rate Per Front Foot Assessment for sidewalk per Square Foot $0.36636 (R 1 - R-2) Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Ft. TO . 225 $8.21 Business Rate Per Fromm Foot (Other than R---L and R -2) BASED ON 40 FEED OF STFM VT= Lengt a )Depth Lin. Pay. Assessment rat. for PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITIO Block Lot Abut. of Owner- . of Rate Paving and Sidewalk idewalk Drive- Driveway musting TOTAL No. No. Prop. Wing ship rove - Curb and Sq. Ft. Assess- vay Assess- Facili- ASSESSMEM 5� p o Co. Frederic Tract 100 B -3 100} 100 100% 823.59 14((4 f3..2$• ?$x.00 %k •$0 1'419.68 53 D. W. Grant Frederic Tract 131. B -3 1001 131.32 100% 1,081.5-4 245.28 =_$9. -86 - -79.5 55.03 1;226.4}3 54 Wm. & Helen Garnett Meyer Frederic Tract 145. A -2 100} 145.84 100% 1,201.12 455.6 166.8 0.:8 215.16 1 8 .11 55 D. W. Grant woodlawn 99.8 A -2 1001 99.8 100`% 821.94 .9.20 116.94 2 18 .6o 1 126.4±$ 56 y� 2 104 R -2 100 104 1 6 6 57 Barbara J. Gray Woodlawn 3 104 R-2 100} 104 100% 675.57 376 137.75 301 2oB•37 11,021.69 4 100 R 100} 100 100% 649.59 360 131.89 341 236.06 1;017,49 8 A. M. Lacey Woodlawn -2 Albert Owen woodlawn 5 100 R -2 100} 100 l00% 649.59 400 1-46.54 x'13 6 100 R -2 100} 100 10096 649.59 360 X31.89 271 187.60, 181.43 832.63 E. C. Peterson Woodlawn 61 Dr. J. V. Blair Woodlawn 7 100 R -2 100} 100 100% 649.59 360 131.89 231 159.91 403.22 538.17 62 Nellie 8 R -2 40 100% 259.84 364 133.36 .161.29 231-91 oodlawn 100 loot 1 *Credit for -Excavation & 4f Hot -Mix Base .0322 Per J n. Ft. t r • AMOM FINAL PAVING ASSESSMENT w -- NORTH SIDE LIPAN STREET FROM OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD TO HIGHWAY NO. 9 -- UNIT III 41" Hot -Mix Asphaltic Cone. Base & ?In CONTRACTOR TYPE OF PAVEMENT 1� Hot -Mix Asphaltic Cone. HELDENFELS.EROS. CONTRACT DATE ' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY ASSESSMENT RATE PAVEMENT AND CURB AND. GUTTER (Not including sidewalk or driveways) ASSESSMENT COSTS $6.49589 Resi@ential Rate per Front Foot Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot 0. 6636 (R -1 - R -2) Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square IS10-69225 8.23591 Business Rate Per Front Foot (Other than R -1 and R -2) BASED ON 40 FEET OF STREET WIDTH h Type Depth Lin. % Pay. Assessment refit. f r PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDTTIO Blk. Lot rA . of Owner- ft. of Rate Paving and Sidewalk Sidewalk Drive Driveway Exist TOTAL No. No. . on ing ship Improv - Charge Curb and Sq. Ft. Assess- way Assess- Facili H From St ment able Gutter ment Ft. went ties 6 D.W. Grant urban Rome Sites Suburban Home P rt o 788 68.3 B- loo 68.8 l0 563-17 6 .1 irt o 64 Gertrude E. Guy Sites 8 86.61 B-1 1004 86.61 i00% 0 I y Z U Ci TI $T Suburban ome 6 W.C. Ghorml Sites B-3— IOOJ MIA lool 8-49.24 4o7.6o 149.3 66 Martha A. Mayfield Subur Home sites 10 01.9 B -3 100 101. 1 8 .2 '167.6 134.62 1 62. 1.036.90 2 1.162.52 42 . 6 Ben Vau E.R. Oliver Tr. - 68 Geo. Clark E.R. Oliver Tr. 6.10 B- 100 1 6.10 1 1,120. 44.4 199.4 I l B- 100 0.1 1 42.0 0.4 1 1 132.22 91.65 70 Humble Oil & Ref. Co. E.R. Oliver Tr. 5.7 B -3 115.76 10 O 164.8 TOTAL ASSESSMENT - UNIT III $19,518.34 SUMMARY - -- UNITS I, II & III FINAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COST $ 176,754.65 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS $90,851.41 TOTAL PRIVATE .PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSMENTS $ 89,338.34 ASSESSED CITY AS.A PROPERTY OWNER 1 51 .O TOTAL COST TO CITY $ 87, 416.31 TOTAL ASSESSED PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS ,33 •3 SECTION 2. The necessity for amending said Ordinance No, 5146,in order to correct and adjust assessments against same, creates a public emergency and an imperative public necessity, requiring the suspension of the Charter Rule that no ordinance or resolution shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction, and that said ordinance shall be read at three several meetings of the City Council, and the Mayor having declared that such emergency and imperative public necessity exists, and having requested that the Charter Rule be suspended and that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introduction and that this ordinance take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 29th day of April, 1959. MAYOR CITY OF CORPUS ISTI, T9AS ATTEST: City Se terry APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: City Attor CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ,9%s TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS GENTLEMEN: FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFOR£, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. ELLROY KING RESPECTFULLY, MAYOR THE CITY OF CORPU HRISTI, EXAS THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ELLROY KING I I LCP JAMES L. BARNARD _ R. A. HUMBLE MRS. RAY AIRHEART l.(i 0 ,{�itlAi GABE L. LOZANO, SR. JOSEPH B. DUNN dl O d � PATRICK J. DUNNE C%OA 0 \ R. A. HUMBLE GABE L. LOZANO, SR. ,( THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED /i.1-7 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ELLROY KING JAMES L. BARNARD MRS. RAY AIRHEART iC JOSEPH B. DUNN I PATRICK J. DUNNE T R. A. HUMBLE ,{�itlAi GABE L. LOZANO, SR. WG P\