Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 07/15/1986PRESENT: Mayor Luther Jones Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Jack Best Council Members: David Berlanga, Sr. Leo Guerrero Joe McComb Frank Mendez Bill Pruet Linda Strong Mary Pat Slavik MINUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JULY 15, 1986 2:00 P.M. City Manager Craig McDowell Assistant City Attorney Jimmy Bray City Secretary Armando Chapa Mayor Jones called the meeting to order in the Council Chamber of City Hall. The invocation was given by Council Member McComb, following which the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States was led by Mayor Pro Tem Best. City Secretary Chapa called the roll and verified that a quorum of the Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 8, 1986 be approved as presented; seconded by Council Member Pruet; and passed unanimously. * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Daniel D. Pipitone, Building Code Board of Appeals. * * * * * * * * * * * City Manager McDowell stated that he was proud to announce that the City of Corpus Christi had received the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting. He introduced Mr. Juan Garza, Director of Finance. Mr. Garza stated that he is proud of the staff members who contributed towards this award. He then introduced several members of the Finance Department. * * * * * * * * * * * MICROFILMED minutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 2 Mayor Jones announced the bid opening on the following project: Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements: To handle the hydraulic loading and sewage overflows which occur during heavy rains. The work will include pumping and piping modifications to enable the plant to handle flows up to 20 MGD during high flow conditions only. The proposed modifications have been approved by the Texas Department of Health, and funds for this work are available in the Sanitary Sewer Bond Fund. Assistant City Manager James K. Lentos opened bids from the following companies: Bracco Construction Co., Inc., Hallmark Contracting, Inc., and Stefek Construction Company. Mayor Jones stated that the bids would be tabled for 48 hours, pursuant to the requirements of the City Charter, for tabulation and recommendation. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for consideration of the Consent Motions, items 1 through 8; there were no comments from the audience on the motions; a motion was made by Council Member Guerrero that the following motions be approved; seconded by Council Member Mendez; and passed unanimously. M86-0327 1. Approval of specifications and authorization to receive bids for water treating chemicals, including aluminum sulphate, ferric sulphate, and cationic polymer. The term of this agreement will be twelve months, with option to extend for an additional twelve months at the same terms and conditions, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. These chemicals will be used by Water Production. Estimated annual expenditure is $555,000. Funds are anticipated in the 1986-87 budget. M86-0328 2. Approval of specifications and authorization to receive bids for field tire repair service. The term of this agreement will be twelve months with option to extend for an additional twelve months, at the same terms and conditions, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. These items will be used by the Equipment Maintenance Division. Estimated annual expenditure is $65,000. Funds are anticipated in the 1986-87 budget. M86-0329 3. Approving a supply agreement for lubricating oils and greases with the following companies based on low bid. The term of this agreement will be twelve months with option to extend for an additional twelve months, at the same terms and conditions, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. These items are used by the Maintenance Service Department. Sixteen bid invitations were issued, six bids were received. Prices have decreased approximately 7% from last contract of June, 1985. Funds are anticipated in the 1986-87 budget. minutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 3 Arnold Oil Company 7,000 gals. solvent $ 7,280.00 6,300 gals. auto transmission fluid 13,947.00 4,700 lbs. molybdenum disulfide grease 3,251.00 Total $24,478.00 Industrial Lubricants 24,000 gals. motor oil $49,600.00 6,600 lbs. extreme pressure grease 2,704.50 3,000 gals. anti -freeze 8,670.00 Total $60,974.50 Texas Star 5,000 gals. universal 303 fluid $10,550.00 500 gals. torque fluid 1,055.00 300 lbs. wheel bearing grease 194.40 Total $11,799.40 GRAND TOTAL $97,251.90 Reject the bids received for hydraulic oil and authorize new bids to be received for a twelve month supply agreement with option to extend for an additional twelve months, at the same terms and conditions, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee, for approximately 8,000 gallons of hydraulic oil. Estimated expenditure is $13,840. Specifications have been revised by Maintenance Services. M86-0330 4. Approving the purchase of a 10" trailer mounted pump from Air Specialty & Equipment, based on low bid for the amount of $19,885. The pump will be used by Wastewater Services for pumping raw sewage during maintenance and construction. Twenty bid invitations were issued and ten bids were received. Funds were approved in the 1985-86 budget. M86-0331 5. Approving plans and specifications for the Corpus Christi International Airport Entrance Sign and authorizing the receipt of bids on August 5, 1986. This project will be funded by Certificates of Obligation. The illuminated sign will read "Corpus Christi International Airport" when entering and "Welcome to Corpus Christi" when leaving the Airport. „inutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 4 M86-0332 6. Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into an agreement with the Muscular Dystrophy Association for the 2nd Annual Bud Light Gumbo Cook -Off to be held on August 23, 1986 from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at Cole Park. Proceeds from the event will benefit the Muscular Dystrophy Association. The Park and Recreation Board approved of the event at their June meeting. M86-0333 7. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Inter -Local Agreement for the establishment of a Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse. M86-0334 8. Scheduling a public hearing for August 5, 1986 on a request to close Waco Street between Lipan and Mestina Streets. The request to close this 60 -foot wide right-of-way has been made by Nueces County in connection with proposed plans to expand the existing County Jail. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for consideration of the Consent Ordinances, items 9 through 12. Council Member Slavik referred to the annexation of land by ordinance 9, and Assistant City Manager Tom Utter stated that all costs would be borne by the developer, noting that this is a platted subdivision. Mayor Jones stated that it is this kind of growth that makes it possible to keep the tax rate low. At Mrs. Slavik's request, Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning, displayed a transparency of the areas to be annexed (Ordinances 9 through 12). Mr. Wenger stated that Ordinance 9 annexes 16.3 acres of street right-of-way between Staples and Everhart; the second reading of the ordinance authorizing the annexation contract (ordinance 10) is land abutting the Oso Parkway and South Staples Street, near the vicinity of King's Crossing; the second reading of the ordinance authorizing the annexation contract (ordinance 11) is land located at County Road 13, which will be Bear Creek Subdivision; and the second reading of the ordinance authorizing the annexation contract (ordinance 12) is the Kaffie School Tract, adjacent to Brockhampton Road in Brighton Village Subdivision. Council Member Slavik observed that all of the areas are being served by the Oso Water Reclamation Plant. There were no comments from the audience; City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote; and the following ordinances were approved: .. nutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 5 9. ORDINANCE NO. 19382 ANNEXING A 16.3 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OWNED BY CORPUS CHRISTI LAND VENTURE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye." 10. SECOND READING AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND CORPUS CHRISTI LAND VENTURE ASSOCIATES FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 25.19 ACRES OF LAND IN NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID LAND TO LIE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. The ordinance was read for the second time and passed to third reading as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye." 11. SECOND READING AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND HANK OLSON DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 47.63 ACRES OF LAND IN NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID LAND TO LIE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. The ordinance was read for the second time and passed to third reading as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye." 12. SECOND READING AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND THE CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 23.56 ACRES OF LAND IN NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID LAND TO LIE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. The ordinance was read for the second time and passed to third reading as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye." .,inutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for consideration of ordinance 13, calling an election for August 9, 1986, for the purpose of annexing additional territories to the City of Corpus Christi. He explained that this is before the Council as a result of a recommendation from the Council Committee on Annexation, consisting of Council Members Berlanga, Guerrero, Pruet, and Strong. Council Members Pruet and Strong read the following report on the annexation: At our retreat nine months ago, the City Council developed a prioritized list of the goals we felt we should pursue during our term of office. Five of our 15 top priorities were directly related to Padre and Mustang Islands, including: 1. Beach cleanup on Padre Island 2. Emphasis on economic development 3. Aid in opening the Packery Channel boat pass 4. Upgrade major parks (the beach is a major park) 5. Take the lead in eliminating duplication in city/county services In setting these specific goals as high priorities, the Council recognized that the Islands hold great promise for bringing new jobs, new capital investment and more visitors to our community. We also recognized that the islands are a fundamental element in the rich quality of life we cherish in Corpus Christi. The Council felt it was time the City give more attention to the need for adequate public facilities on the Islands. Our Council Committee was established to work with island interests and to make recommendations for addressing the objectives identified by the Council. An elementary analysis led us to the simple conclusion that the City can do little if the area is outside the City limits -- as is the case with Packery Channel and almost all of the beachfront. Without annexation our ability to manage public resources and address public safety needs is limited. With this in mind, our Committee respectfully recommends that the Council submit two annexation proposals to the city voters on August 9: PROPOSITION ONE NUECES COUNTY --- Annexation of those pockets of land on Padre and Mustang Island in Nueces County which were left out of the City's 1981 annexation of island property. ninutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 7 PROPOSITION TWO KLEBERG COUNTY --- Annexation of the area of Padre Island from the Nueces County line southward to a point just beyond the Malaquite Beach visitor's center in the Padre Island National Seashore. We recommend two propositions instead of just one because there are distinctly different reasons for annexation of each of these two geographical areas. REASONS FOR ANNEXING PORTIONS OF NUECES COUNTY 1. LONG RANGE PLANNING -- Through its ordinance -making power the City has the breadth of authority and resources to plan for and provide the public facilities needed on the Islands now and in the future. No other governmental agency has such broad authority. The annexation of all proposed areas will allow specific planning to begin for public facilities such as a boat pass, improved beach access, beach parks, public parking, bathhouses and restrooms, public marinas, an information center and transportation terminals. This long-range planning should include a plan for financing these important new public facilities without putting undue burden on existing City taxpayers. 2. JOBS -- Existing and new jobs are directly tied to whether our visitors have a quality beach experience that will make them want to return with more tourist dollars. Residents also want the opportunity to have a quality beach experience. This means we need a strong beach management program and adequate public facilities. Only the City, through its ordinance -making power, has the authority to handle all the components of managing the tremendous resource represented by our beaches. 3. RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT -- Only the City can assure quality, responsible development on the Islands. The City has the authority to insure that development is consistent with good stewardship of the environment and with the best interests of the City as a whole. High standards and sound enforcement are essential to making sure island residents are treated equitably in setting insurance rates. 4. SEAMLESS LAW ENFORCEMENT -- A patchwork of law enforcement jurisdictions exists on the Islands. Despite the best efforts of all involved there are sometimes holes in the system -- holes that can be better filled when the area is consolidated under the clear jurisdiction of the City Police Department. Because the Islands attract large weekend and .nnutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 8 holiday crowds, there will always be a need to combine the efforts of every available law enforcement agency to meet these peak demands. 5. SHARING IN THE COST OF CITY SERVICES -- The entire area recommended for annexation in Nueces County today enjoys the benefit of city facilities and services without having to pay a fair share of city taxes. This is particularly true of completed subdivisions on Padre Island that receive city water and wastewater services but are not in the city. Portions of the Laguna Madre and the Gulf of Mexico 'in Kleberg County are presently within the Corpus Christi city limits. All of the reasons for annexation of Nueces County areas stated above apply equally well to those land areas of Kleberg County we believe should now be annexed by the City of Corpus Christi. REASONS FOR ANNEXING PORTIONS OF KLEBERG COUNTY The Council Committee would like to cite the following as specific reasons for annexing both that acreage commonly known as the Mullins Tract and that portion of the National Seashore served by paved roads: 1. ELIMINATION OF "NO MAN'S LAND" -- The fact that there is no direct land link between Kleberg County and that part of Padre Island within its legal boundaries has meant law enforcement is sometimes non-existent in this area. Making the area part of the City will eliminate a "no man's land" which has been the scene of several murders and other violent crimes in recent years. 2. DUNE PROTECTION -- City control is needed to protect vital dunes and dune vegetation. Outside the National Seashore no such protection is now provided. The City can also guarantee that the public is provided adequate access to the beach via access roads and required pedestrian easements. 3. SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SEASHORE -- The National Seashore remains the most powerful magnet for first-time visitors who decide to vacation in our area. The Seashore, like all units of the National Park Service, is the victim of severe Federal budget restraints. It appears that in the years ahead cooperative efforts may be necessary to make sure visitors to the Seashore have a rewarding visit. The City can only participate in such cooperative efforts if that portion of the Seashore frequented by most visitors is inside the City. minutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 9 4. REVERSAL OF "UNDEVELOPED" DESIGNATION -- In 1982, that portion of Kleberg County that is not part of the Seashore was mistakenly included in the Federal Barrier Resources System even though public utilities were in place and the area met the test to be designated as "developed." Classification of this area as "undeveloped" by the U.S. Department of Interior effectively stops any development there by prohibiting issuance of federal permits, flood insurance, loan guarantees, assistance in highway and bridge construction and participation in federal disaster relief, and other federal funding mechanisms. It locks the public out of this area for anything but primitive uses. Annexation of this area by the City will further bolster the unanimous position taken by the City Council in 1985 urging that the mistaken classification of this property be reversed. This 4,200 acre area can provide badly -needed new tax revenue to Kleberg County and the Riviera Independent School District in the future only if the federal classification is reversed and private investments can be made. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS While members of the Committee believe annexation is important if we are to further pursue the Council's high priority Island goals, we recognize the necessity for dealing with financial realities. In exploring the cost/revenue equation, we conferred with Nueces County officials, Constable Ronnie Polston, Police Chief Bill Banner, National Seashore Director Bill Lukens, State Senator Carlos Truan, the directors of the Padre Isles Property Owners Association and the trustees of the Riviera Independent School District. The commi- ssioners courts of both Nueces and Kleberg Counties provided us cost information on law enforcement and beach cleaning. The city staff has provided projected revenues and estimated costs for serving the area we propose be annexed. Revenues can be projected rather accurately at $260,000 per year based on current tax valuations. The property that will produce this tax revenue is almost all vacant land. With the realization of new public facilities such as the proposed Packery Channel boat pass, it can be anticipated that new development will occur, property values will increase and, likewise, tax revenues will go up substantially, both in the newly -annexed areas and those areas on Padre Island that are already in the City. The cost of providing services at current levels to the new areas is estimated at $400,000 per year. That would result in a net cost to the City of approximately $135,000 if both Nueces and Kleberg counties cut off all services. Continued financial participation by Nueces and r,inutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 10 Kleberg counties, as tentatively agreed, will reduce the net cost to the City. The City has authority to impose user fees to offset beach cleaning expenses. This could further reduce net cost to the City. WHY ANNEXATION SHOULD GO TO THE VOTERS IN 1986 Bringing the question of annexation to City voters now rather than later is appropriate for several reasons, including: (1) Annexation of beaches and pockets left out in 1981 is a step that cannot be by-passed if the Council expects to successfully address its high-priority goals for the Islands; (2) August 9 is the only date available for such an election this calendar year under State law: (3) If annexation takes place this calendar year, new tax revenues will be collected in 1987. If the election is held in January or April, new revenues will not come in until 1988; (4) An August annexation will allow implementation of the service plan during the relatively calm fall and winter months. A January or April election would force implementation during the busy spring holiday and summer beach season. CONCLUSIONS The mission of our Council Committee was to make recommendations on how the Council should proceed in making long-term public decisions affecting the future of the Islands. Again we emphasize: The City can do little to protect its resources, encourage responsible development and build the tax base on the Islands if the areas to be managed and controlled are outside the City. Last fall the Council unanimously endorsed the concept of financing major public improvements on the Islands -- including a boat pass -- through establishment of a tax reinvestment zone. Such new public facilities would stimulate significant private investment, build the tax base and enhance the likelihood of visitors having a quality beach experience. To date, our Council Committee has not had the opportunity to consider the merits of setting up a new reinvestment zone. We can simply observe that for areas to be included in any such future zone, those areas must be within the city limits. Sound annexation decisions have been made in the past with full knowledge that there would initially be a net cost to the City. A preoccupation with the short-term cost/revenue projections begs the real issue: Is the City Council willing to make decisions of lasting innutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 11 significance -- to commit to the long-term task of planning and managing our Island resources -- or will we elect to ignore the public safety needs and economic opportunities that present themselves on the Islands? The Committee requests that the Council give this recommendation favorable consideration and unanimously support a motion calling an annexation election for August 9. Padre and Mustang Islands have much to do with our City's future. Annexation of those areas south of the State Park will be one of the real lasting legacies of the City Council. During the foregoing presentation, Assistant City Manager Utter provided the Council with a breakdown of the annexation financial summary. He stated that the tax to be generated would be $262,981; estimated police protection costs would be $225,000; Nueces County pays approximately $191,000 for beach clean up within the areas to be annexed; he anticipates that the County would continue maintenance of the park area, therefore the City's cost for cleanup would be $125,000; Kleberg County currently pays $40,000 per year for beach clean up; there would be a one time expense of $10,000 for a brush truck; $400 for street signs; and additional long term costs for street maintenance. He noted that Del Mar Junior College District would receive $45,000 in revenue. Mr. Utter stated that the figures do not include costs for lifeguards, noting that Nueces County is currently re-evaluating the lifeguard program; therefore, there may be additional costs of approximately $58,000 for lifeguards. Council Member Guerrero stated that the City has a responsibility to make decisions in the best interest of the community; sometimes those are calculated risks, but if the benefits are weighed against the liabilities, there is no choice but to make a business decision. Mr. Guerrero referred to the fact that the citizens never had a chance to vote on the landmass and the citizens are being given a chance to vote on the annexation. Council Member Berlanga agreed with Mr. Guerrero's comments, stating that the people will have a chance to express their opinion at the polls. He stated that there are times when a calculated risk must be taken in order to ensure progress. Council Member Slavik stated that she would like the election delayed because the City will receive $250,000 in revenue, but $700,000 in expenses; technically, the County does not have to help with beach maintenance; she needs more time to obtain financial information as to how much revenue would be lost from the General Fund; the public's perception is not good for this election; they feel that this is a "railroad job"; there will be an election in April, so if it were delayed until April, a savings of $42,000 in elections costs would be effected; and she is opposed to the National Seashore being included. „mutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 12 Council Member Slavik made a motion that the annexation election be delayed until January or April. The motion died for lack of a second. Mayor Pro Tem Best asked why the City would want to annex the National Seashore. Mr. Utter stated that the City has no responsibility as far as federal property is concerned, but if it were a part of the City, cooperative programs could be performed. He noted that the National Seashore completely encircles the private property and that the City would be able to control the uses in the water. Dr. Best suggested just annexing the water, and Mr. Utter stated that that is possible, but in order to work with the National Seashore, it must be annexed. Council Member Strong stated that the National Seashore Park Rangers provide their own law enforcement, but in times of emergency, City assistance is required. She stated that through annexation, fire and police protection would be available. She stated that in the event the private property in Kleberg County adjacent to the Seashore became developed, it would not be desirous to have a hotel development directly next to the Seashore. She stated that the City could provide zoning to provide a transitional area. Mrs. Strong stated that the National Seashore carries with it the reputation of Corpus Christi and that cooperative efforts are not easily maintained if the land is not in the City limits. Mayor Pro Tem Best asked if there was a commitment in writing from the Federal Government, State, and County that those entities would continue their level of service. Council Member Strong stated that there have been no discussions with the Federal Government, but by law, the State must provide money. Council Member Mendez stated that all of the reasons for annexation are good, but before calling the election, there should be agreements with the various governmental entities concerning financial considerations. Council Member Slavik stated that her concern is the timing of the election; she feels that it is a waste of money when there will be an election in April; and people are concerned because they do not know enough about the election. Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience. Kleberg County Judge W.C. McDaniels, stated that any felony that is committed in Kleberg County must be tried in Kleberg County but, if this becomes a part of the city limits, the City would have to pay for transporting the people involved in the case. He stated that he is disturbed by talk of a nsnutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 13 Reinvestment Zone in the area because taxes would be frozen at the present level. He stated that this needs to be discussed. Nueces County Judge Bob Barnes stated that if the annexation is approved by the voters, Nueces County will cooperate on some basis. He stated that it is not appropriate to negotiate an agreement prior to the election; the County is being hit by the diminishing tax valuations, so they are concerned about any diversion of funds; there is no question that there will be a reinvestment zone on the island, so that would affect the County. Council Member Mendez inquired if a reinvestment zone would affect the County's participation in beach clean up, and Judge Barnes stated that he has no authority regarding reinvestment zones. Judge Barnes stated that the County will cooperate with the City. Nueces County Commissioner J.P. Luby asked that the election be delayed until matters could be worked out; the County does not want to be a part of a Reinvestment Zone; he referred to the lengthy time it would take to train new police officers to cover the area; and he noted that the Constable cannot go into Kleberg County. Commissioner Luby stated that it will cost more money than the City will receive; he is not against annexation, but is against the date of the annexation. He stated that by having the election at this time, it could cause it to fail. Mr. Orville Ballard, Superintendent of Riviera School District, stated that the School Board adopted a resolution in support of the concept of the annexation of properties that lie within their jurisdiction. He stated that the area within their jurisdiction comprises approximately 65% of their total tax base; and it would be disastrous if development occurred on the property without some kind of governmental control. Mr. L.A. Nikoloric, Padre Isles Property Owners Association, stated that currently it is difficult to administer the Island when some parts are in the City limits and some are not. He stated that he is in favor of the election. Mr. Danny Martinez, representing the Chamber of Commerce Chairman of the Board Jace Hoffman, stated that the Board of Directors of the Chamber endorses the proposed annexation of areas of Mustang Island and Padre Island and also the date of the election. Mr. Ace Shedd, President of Corpus Christi Police Officers' Association, stated that there is currently a shortage of manpower; there is a need for a substation in Flour Bluff and Annaville; the one beat proposed to cover the island is insufficient; and Constable Ronnie Polston currently helps in Flour Bluff. Council Member Strong stated that the Committee has looked into this; they share his concern; the proposed beat would not draw from the present police ninutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 14 force; and they are working closely with the police department. Mr. Shedd stated that it would take time to train the additional officers; therefore a unit would need to be in place before the training was finished. He stated he is not against annexation, but concerned about adequate police coverage. Council Member Pruet stated that the Committee does not see one beat as the final answer, but as a start. He stated that lead time would exist no matter when the property is annexed. Mr. Lewis Lovelace, 1549 Casa Grande, stated that the election should be held in April; he referred to figures quoted by Tom Utter that revenues would be $262,000 and expenses would be $400,000; he stated that Council Member Slavik quoted expenses of $700,000; Council Member Pruet has said that the City would gain $10,000 in taxes over expenses; he stated that people wonder what hold Ralph Durden has over the committee; he questioned why it is not proposed to annex north of Mustang Island Park, noting that Mr. Durden has condominiums located there that are not being taxed by the City. He suggested that all of Nueces County be annexed and eliminate either County or City government. Mayor Jones noted that annexing all of Nueces County would take an act of the legislature. Mr. Larry Torres stated that he agrees with Council Member Slavik; i.e., people do not know what the City has planned and need further information. He stated that the Council should be more concerned with the local residents than tourists. He stated that the National Seashore should be left out of the annexation election, and that someone is making money off the annexation. Mr. Ben Sley, Remove Intoxicated Drivers, spoke in favor of the annexation and against the argument that the drinking while driving ordinance would hurt tourism. Mr. Joe De La Garza stated that he was in favor of the annexation. Mr. J.E. O'Brien, 4130 Pompano, stated that he is not opposed to the annexation, but is opposed to the timing. He stated that the Executive Committee of the Taxpayers' Association will strenuously oppose the annexation if it is held on August 9. He stated that 25 days notice of the election is not enough time to verify figures that have been given by the Committee. He questioned the reason for annexing federal seashore. Mr. Lee Brock presented petitions containing 1,100 signatures against annexation of beach areas. He stated that the beaches should remain as they are; open beaches for everyone, not an area that would be controlled by City regulations and private developments restricting access and complete public use. r,inutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 15 Mr. Calvin Floyd, 1379 Normandy, stated that Corpus Christi Beach is not developed; therefore, the City should not be taking in additional beaches. Mr. Hank Snyder, 9 Rock Creek Dr., stated that it is tiring to see the same people always before the Council that are opposed to everything. He referred to the delay of the Convention Center and the extra costs involved because certain people were opposed to it and he referred to the landmass and that the same people were also opposed. Mr. Snyder stated that certain people demean the word "developer"; they are now demeaning Ralph Durden; he pointed out that everyone that was interested in developing the landmass are longtime Corpus Christi citizens; and the same applies to this annexation. He stated that Ralph Durden lives in this City too, and he urged the Council not to take the word of a few people, but to have the election. Mr. George Perez, 4814 Goldeneye, stated that he is in favor of the annexation. He stated that the citizens are being put on "notice" by one of the Council Members. He then referred to several newspaper articles quoting Council Member Slavik regarding the landmass and the drought. Mr. Perez stated that there is too much negativism in the City caused by the Taxpayers' Association and the Citizens Coalition. Council Member Slavik stated that she is concerned about Mr. Perez' remarks. Mr. Ed Notzon, 715 Upper South Broadway, stated that he thinks highly of Ralph Durden and the City is fortunate to have him as a citizen. He stated that there was no personal animosity expressed at the Taxpayers' Association meeting against anyone. He stated that the next newsletter of the Taxpayers' Association will have the pros and cons of the annexation election being held now or being held at a later date. Mr. Doug Lawrence, 5545 S. Alameda, stated that he favors development that will bring in a good tax base, but he is opposed to the loss of his business which annexation would cause. He stated that rules and regulations could force him to close his business on the island. In response from Council Member Guerrero, Mr. Lawrence that if access to the beach is denied to the public, it would affect his business. He stated that he has a rental concession on the beach, and people drive their vehicles to his concession to rent the items they want. He stated that the Holiday Inn is conducting a private vending business and if traffic is restricted, the beaches would become private. to a question stated Council Member remarks. Guerrero requested a staff response to Mr. Lawrence's Assistant City Attorney Bray stated that the State of Texas has a strong open beach law and the City has no authority to close the beach; the City would have police regulations, but as far as closing beaches for the benefit of runutes Regular Council July 15, 1986 Page 16 condominiums, Council regulations, and the City Meeting that would be a violation of the law. Member Strong stated that through City platting and zoning the City can require pedestrian easements between private property can also require more access roads. Mr. Jim Sambol, 13930 Cabana North, stated that he is in favor of annexation and he urged the Council to vote unanimously to pass the ordinance calling the election. Mr. Sambol stated that he feels Ralph Durden has the community's interest at heart, but at the same time he is going to make money. Mr. Gordon Self stated that he is proud to be an American and a Texan and is proud of the beaches. He stated that the beaches should be preserved and areas should be set aside that will be protected. He stated that he is a vendor on the beach and he is happy to see people at the beach having a good time. He urged that the beaches never be closed so that all people can enjoy them, not just the ones who own condominiums. out not There were no further comments from the audience. Mayor Jones stated that he will vote in favor of the ordinance; he pointed that no other City has to annex by election; and he pointed out that this is an election on Ralph Durden. Council Member Slavik stated that it is good the citizens will have an opportunity to vote, but she does not agree with having the election in three weeks. She stated that she does not want the National Seashore annexed. Council Member McComb stated that based on the merits of the presentation by the Committee, it is a timely election. He stated that the people have an opportunity to express themselves at the polls. Mayor Pro Tem Best stated that he is more comfortable with the election because it will be two propositions, one being Padre Island, and two, being the National Seashore. Council Member Pruet stated that many people have expressed concerns that the Committee felt strongly about; the committee report is available to the public; and he hopes that they will review it. He stated that it is incumbent upon the Council to inform the public what the election is about. He thanked the members of the Committee for their time in developing the presentation that was made today. He stated that he personally hopes that the merits of both tracts can win the public favor on August 9. Council Member Mendez stated that the Committee did a thorough job and he feels that the City will be annexing for the right reason -- long range planning. He stated that his concerns regarding the cooperation and participation of the different governmental bodies have been alleviated in that different entities indicated that they look forward to negotiating with the City. ..sautes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 17 City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote on the ordinance as follows: 13. ORDINANCE NO. 19383 ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT CERTAIN TERRITORY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BY LOTS AND BLOCKS OR METES AND BOUNDS ON FILE IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY SECRETARY AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE THE SAME AS IF COPIED VERBATIM HEREIN, SHALL BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI; DEFINING THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED; PROVIDING PROCEDURE FOR THE HOLDING OF SUCH ELECTION; PRESCRIBING THE FORM OF NOTICE OF ELECTION; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR FORM OF BALLOT AT EACH POLLING PLACE; ENACTING PROVISIONS INSTANT AND RELATING TO THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, and Strong voting "aye"; Slavik voting "no." * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Council recessed the meeting at 4:25 p.m. and reconvened at 4:40 p.m. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Council Member Guerrero departed the meeting at 4:40 p.m. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for consideration of ordinances 14 and 15, increasing wastewater and garbage rates. City Manager McDowell stated that Ordinance 14, wastewater rates, is in relation to the bond issue, and Ordinance 15, garbage rate increase, is necessary to cover the increased costs of operation. In response to a question from Council Member Slavik, Mr. Oscar Martinez, Assistant Budget Director, stated that the wastewater rates were increased 5% last year. He reiterated Mr. McDowell's statement that the garbage rates are being increased to offset increased cost of providing services and to finance improvements to the landfill. In response to a question from Council Member Berlanga, Mr. McDowell stated that negotiations have started regarding resource recovery, but he will have a more complete report at a later date. He stated that in the future, resource recovery will have an effect on garbage rates. minutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 18 In response to a question from Council Member Mendez, Mr. Martinez explained that the maximum to be billed for wastewater is 15,000 gallons. Council Member McComb inquired if there was a provision for wastewater being tied to water consumption, and Mr. Martinez explained that that is the reason for the 15,000 maximum. There were no comments from the audience; City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote; and the following were approved: 14. FIRST READING AMENDING SECTION 55-100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, 1976 REVISION, SO AS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN INCREASES IN WASTEWATER RATES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. The Ordinance was read for the first time and passed to second reading as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye"; Guerrero absent. 15. FIRST READING AMENDING SECTIONS 21-7, 21-18 THROUGH 28-21.1, AND 21-46 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SO AS TO INCREASE IN GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL CHARGES EFFECTIVE WITH THE FIRST BILLING CYCLE IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 1986; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. The Ordinance was read for the first time and passed to second reading as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye"; Guerrero absent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones announced the public hearing on two zoning cases. 16. Application No. 686-3T, Corpus Christi Land Venture Associates: For a proposed change to the text of the City Zoning Ordinance 1/6106 as amended as follows: Amend Article 31, Newly Annexed Territory, by amending Section 31-5 setting forth zoning classifications of "R -1C" and "R -1B" One -family Dwelling Districts, "A-2" Apartment House District, and "B-4" General Business District on approximately 345 acres out of Lots 17, 18, 30, 31, and 32, Section 21; Lots 1, 2, 3, 14-19, 25, 26, Section 22, and all of Fractional Section 23, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, when annexed to the City of Corpus Christi, located adjacent to and east of County Road 13 (Cimarron Boulevard) between Yorktown Boulevard and the Oso Creek. £,mutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 19 Mr. Tom Utter, Assistant City Manager, stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Tracts 1, 2, 3, and 5, and denial of Tract 4, and in lieu thereof, grant "B-1", and the Planning Staff recommends approval of Tracts 1 through 3, denial of Tracts 4 and 5, and in lieu thereof, grant "B-1" and "A-1", respectively. Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning, displayed the area on the zoning and land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area, and showed slides of the vicinity. At the request of Council Member Strong, Mr. Wenger pointed out the location of the requested "B-4" zoning, noting that it will be at the intersection of two roads. Council Member Slavik stated that during the Planning Commission meeting, there was discussion that tract 5 was in the wetlands and there was discussion regarding the height requirements. Mr. Wenger stated that it was the staff's opinion that "A-2" is high density zoning and "A-1" is less; the Oso Parkway is a collector street and will not handle a lot of traffic; the entirety of tract 5 would be used to calculate the density ratio, but the entire tract would not be developed. He stated that under "A-2" zoning, development could be as high as 5 to 6 stories using the total area for calculating, and "A-1" would restrict development to 3 stories. In response to a question from Council Member Pruet, Mr. Wenger stated that "A-2" zoning, due to high density, should not be allowed on a collector street, noting that "A-2" is mostly on arterial streets. Council Member Pruet asked what type of zoning is located at Everhart and Oso Parkway, and Mr. Wenger stated that that is close to Yorktown and there is "B-4" and "A-2", but that is at an intersection of two major arterials that can handle the traffic. In response to Council Member McComb's statement regarding Oso Parkway being a major thoroughfare, Mr. Wenger stated that Oso Parkway is a collector, but it does have a wider right-of-way. He stated that it is designed for slow moving traffic. Council Member McComb expressed the opinion that most of the traffic would be travelling north; therefore, he does not feel "A-2" would pose a traffic problem. Mr. McComb pointed out that development cannot take place on wetlands, and Mr. Wenger agreed, but stated that the wetlands can be used for the total calculation. Council Member Strong stated that consideration should be given to a visual corridor along the Parkway and zoning should be appropriate to compensate for Minutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 20 this. Council Member Strong asked why such a small tract was being considered for "R -1B" next to "R -1C", and Mr. Wenger stated that it is being contemplated as a school site, noting that it could have been included in "R -1C." Council Member Berlanga stated that he thought the Oso Parkway was to be a dividing line between the Oso and the residential area, and Mr. Utter stated that the Parkway connects parks along the Oso, and it was never intended to have anything constructed on the creek side. Mr. Wenger stated that the Corps of Engineers determines the wetlands and they are in the process of doing that now. In response to Mrs. Slavik's question, Mr. Utter stated that under "A-2", tract 5 could have approximately 2,916 apartments; the height itself will not be a problem, but what is a problem is getting so many units on the site that there are no visual corridors. He stated that under "A-1," 1,700 units would be allowed, and since development can only take place on 50 acres, it will be a dense complex. Mr. Gene Urban, Urban Engineering, stated that the applicant has applied for "B-4" zoning on tract 4 because a mixed commercial use is needed in that area. He stated that the owners are the developers of King's Crossing Subdivision and they own 1,000 acres that are being developed. He stated that it is not known at this time what the actual use will be, but to be flexible, "B-4" is needed. He stated that he does not feel traffic will be a problem because Cimarron deadends into the Oso Creek; therefore, traffic will be flowing in one direction. Mr. Urban stated that there are 31 acres of wetlands in tract 5, therefore they need a useable density. He stated that a high density is needed in order to have more open space; "A-2" allows 4 stories; they want to do something with the tract that will be an asset to the surrounding community; and height is needed to properly utilize the property. In response to Council Member Strong's question regarding Tract 4, Mr. Urban stated that they envision something that is not the typical shopping center -- a center with perhaps a little theatre. In response to Mrs. Slavik's question, Mr. Urban stated that the height of the development on tract 5 would not adversely affect the area zoned "R -1C" because it would be done before people are actually living there. Council Member Slavik stated that wetlands can be donated to the City for tax purposes, and Mr. Utter agreed, stating that the City can incorporate it into the Oso Parkway. .,inutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 21 Mr. Urban then displayed a map of Yorktown Boulevard and Everhart Road which depicted the same type of zoning that he is requesting. Mr. Ed Martin, Corpus Christi Land Venture, stated that 27.6 acres of tract 5 can be developed and they plan to place at least 1,000 units on the tract. Mr. Utter stated that staff would have no objection to "A-2" on the 27.6 acres, noting that if "A-2" is granted on the entire tract, it could have 2,900 units. Discussion followed between Mr. Utter and Mr. Urban regarding the number of units that could be placed on the different areas of the tract. Mr. Utter stated that he would agree to "A-2" on all of Tract 5, except the wetlands (30 acres). Mr. Martin stated that it should not matter what the wetlands are zoned; the argument that Mr. Utter is making is about too much density; he stated that the purpose of wetlands is for open space; they will be donated to the City at the appropriate time; but, Corpus Christi Land Venture would not get credit for such a donation. Mr. Martin stated that it has not been mentioned as to who will pay for the parkway, possibly by the owners on the adjacent side, but in order to make that happen, some activity is needed. He stated that the property to the east has been acquired; it will be before the Council in the future; and what is zoned today will set the pattern for what is planned with the other property. In response to Council Member Slavik, Mr. Martin stated that if the flood plain was filled and it was economically feasible, consideration could be given to building there, but it is unlikely that anyone could afford the cost of the land plus filling the land. There were no comments from the audience; a motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Best that the hearing be closed; seconded by Council Member Mendez; and passed by the following vote: Jones, Best, Berlanga, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, and Slavik voting "aye"; Guerrero absent; Strong absent at the time the vote was taken. Mayor Jones stated that he did not think the developer would take action on the tract to be zoned "B-4" that would depreciate the value of the property; therefore he supports the requested zoning on all tracts. A motion was made by Council Member McComb that Tract 1 be zoned "B-4"; Tract 2, "R -1C"; Tract 3, "R -1B"; Tract 4, "A-2"; and Tract 5, "B-4"; seconded by Council Member Pruet. Council Member Mendez stated that he felt the wetlands should be excluded, r,inutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 22 and Mr. Urban stated that the Corps of Engineers is looking at that. Council Member Slavik repeated the Planning Commission's recommendation. The motion passed as follows: Jones, Best, Berlanga, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, and Strong voting "aye"; Slavik voting "no"; Guerrero absent. *Mayor Pro Tem Best departed at 5:50 p.m. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9. Application No. 686-4, Fred L. Perez, Jr., M.D.: For a change of zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "AB" Professional Office District on a parcel of land being the east 5' of Lot 11, and all of Lot 12, Block 2, Swantner Place, located on the northwest corner of South Alameda and Stirman Streets.* Mr. Utter stated that in response to the 17 notices mailed, 1 was returned in favor; 11 were returned in opposition; 10 were returned in opposition outside of the area of notification; and 1 petition was received containing 31 signatures. He stated that the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend denial and that the 20% rule is in effect. For the benefit of the audience, Mr. Utter explained that when 20% of the property owners within the area of notification are opposed, the ordinance to effect the zoning change requires 7 affirmative votes. Mr. Wenger displayed the area on the zoning and land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area, and showed slides of the vicinity. Ms. Elizabeth Cuellar, attorney representing Dr. Perez, requested that the case be tabled because the entire Council is not present. A motion was made by Council Member Berlanga that Application No. 686-4 be tabled, seconded by Council Member Mendez. The motion failed to pass as follows: Jones, McComb, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "no"; Berlanga and Mendez voting "aye"; Best and Guerrero absent. *Mayor Pro Tem Best filed an affidavit, on file in the Office of the City Secretary, stating that he has an equitable or legal ownership interest with a fair market value of at least $2,500 in real property near the area being considered for a zoning change. ninutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 23 Mrs. Cuellar provided the Council with information regarding the characteristics of the proposed building, a site plan, landscaping, and letters of support. She stated that the plans are to remove the existing structure; there will be a privacy fence; and there will be minimal interference with the neighborhood. She stated that the applicant is willing to work with the residents and Dr. Perez is agreeable to a special permit. She stated that Dr. Perez is a specialist and his practice is limited to Driscoll Foundation Children's Hospital; therefore, he would like to be in close proximity to the hospital. Ms. Yolanda Bern, attorney, displayed a model of the building and stated that entrances and exits would be on South Alameda. She stated that the first floor of the building would be 900 square feet; the second floor would be 3,200 square feet; and there would be 19 parking spaces. She stated that the doctor has limited hours of practice on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, since he is only in this City for a few days a week, and very little traffic will be generated. She explained that the doctor wanted to be near Driscoll Children's Hospital because that 1s where most of his patients will be. Council Member McComb asked whether Dr. Perez knew the property was not zoned properly for an office at the time he bought it, and Ms. Bern stated that she did not know. Mr. McComb stated that if the realtor represented the property as being zoned for office use, Dr. Perez would have recourse against the realtor. Council Member Strong pointed out that there is a pediatric office building located directly on the other side of the Children's Hospital with vacant space; she stated that she had driven around the area and noted the existence of one residential structure available in the proximity of the hospital and that lot is already zoned for "AB" use; and in her opinion, there is ample office space without rezoning this lot which is located in an area that is predominately zoned for single-family dwellings. Mrs. Strong expressed the opinion that approval of this request would be an intrusion into the residential character of the neighborhood. Council Member Berlanga stated that Alameda, in that vicinity, is mainly zoned for professional offices, and in order to allow progress, the City must allow people to engage in business. He predicted that sometime in the future all of the houses on Alameda will be business zoned. Mrs. Cueller stated that this area of Alameda has become a medical complex; there will only be a staff of three and very limited office hours; she is willing to listen to any suggestions the neighbors might have; and she is agreeable to a special permit. Council Member Pruet referred to curb cuts on Alameda, and Mr. Utter explained that there are driveway restrictions on the plat, and Mr. Wenger stated that only if there were a replat would the restrictions be removed. ninutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 24 Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience. Dr. Ramond Ladowski, Driscoll Foundation Children's Hospital, stated that the hospital is in favor of Dr. Perez locating his practice on the subject property. In response to a question from Council Member Slavik, Dr. Ladowski stated that there are deed restrictions on the hospital property that prevent the sale of land to an individual. Mr. John Hepner, 4325 Key West, referred to the value of Dr. Perez as an orthopedic surgeon specializing in childrens orthopedics. Mayor Jones pointed out that there is no question as to Dr. Perez' capabilities and his value to the community. Dr. Alvaro Ramos stated that he has offices on Alameda on which he had received a special permit. He stated that it would be a great asset to have Dr. Perez next to Driscoll Hospital. Dr. Fred Perez, 4811 Pompano, stated that there is no room for his offices at the pediatrics center; he has tried to locate other sites but has been unable to do so. Mayor Jones stated that he would not support the zoning request, and noted that Mrs. Strong has also expressed the same. Council Member McComb referred to Council Member Guerrero's concerns of changing "R -1B" to business and stated that that theory applies in this case. He stated that he could not support the change in zoning. Council Member Berlanga stated that this will not establish a precedent. He stated that the composition of the Council changes, and the necessary votes to change the zoning might be available at another time. He stated that this is an injustice to Dr. Perez and he does not understand why the neighborhood objects to a doctor. In response to a question from Mayor Jones, City Secretary Chapa stated that the ordinance, if it were before the Council today, would require 7 affirmative votes to pass. He stated that it would require a motion and a majority vote to bring forth the ordinance next week. Council Member Mendez stated that a special permit would have been good, if it could have been worked out, but he does not think this can be accomplished. Council Member Mendez made a motion that Application No. 686-4, Dr. Fred L. Perez, Jr., M.D. be denied; seconded by Council Member McComb; and passed as follows: Jones, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye"; Berlanga voting "no"; Best and Guerrero absent. minutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 25 Mr. William King, 509 Stirman, spoke for those in the audience in opposition. Mr. King stated that the neighborhood has borne the burden of business on South Alameda; he does not think the character of the neighborhood should be changed; they are not against progress; and they are not opposed to Dr. Perez' presence in the community as a resident. He stated that he personally welcomed Dr. Perez to the community and Dr. Perez did not say he had any intention other than using the property as a residence. A motion was made by Council Member McComb to close the hearing; seconded by Council Member Slavik; and passed as follows: Jones, Berlanga, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye"; Best and Guerrero absent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * City Manager McDowell stated that the Lower Nueces River Water Supply District is being dissolved this month. It was decided that an appreciation lunch would be held with the District on July 29, 1986. * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for petitions from the audience. Mr. Martin Garza, Olmos Construction, stated that two weeks ago a bid was awarded to Black Brothers Construction for improvements to South Guth Park. Mr. Garza stated that Olmos is the lowest bidder, not Black Brothers. He stated that his bid was declared irregular because he did not acknowledge an addendum; he did not receive the addendum; and even when the figures were adjusted, he was still the low bidder. He asked that his company be awarded the bid. Mayor Jones asked Mr. Garza to put his request in writing and asked that the City Manager report to the Council on this matter. Mr. Garza stated that the contract has not yet been signed, and Assistant City Attorney Bray stated that signing of the contract would be postponed until the matter has been investigated. Dr. T.J. Barragy, 607 Miramar, stated that he is a member of the Landmark Commission and is involved in the restoration of the Doc McGregor photo collection. He stated that a photo archivist is need as a part of the museum budget and if this is not included, the project to restore the photographs is dead. He stated that he has recruited 375 volunteers for the project, but an archivist is needed to supervise the work. He stated that the cost for the archivist would be $26,000. Mayor Jones stated that this would be added to the list of items to be considered before the budget is adopted. He stated that the Doc McGregor photo collection is priceless and he will support adding an archivist. 2 suutes Regular Council Meeting July 15, 1986 Page 26 Ms. Kathy Boyd, Vice President of the Historical Society, stated that the society is very much in favor of preserving the photos. Mr. Calvin Floyd, 1379 Normandy, stated that the City needs to include more inspectors in the budget. He pointed out that the City will be annexing additional territories, but the number of inspectors is still the same. There being no further business to come before the Council, on motion by Council Member Berlanga, seconded by Council Member Strong and passed unanimously, the meeting adjourned at 6:54 p.m., July 15, 1986. /td I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of the City of Corpus Christi of July 15, 1986 which were approved by the City Council on July 22, 198``6��.�������� WITNESSETH MY HAND AND SEAL, this the 04 day of 61�4C.�+� /7/6. Armando Chapa City Secretary City of Corpus Christi, Texas