HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 12/09/1986PRESENT:
Mayor Luther Jones
Mayor Pro Tem Jack Best
Council Members:
David Berlanga, Sr.
Leo Guerrero
Joe McComb
Frank Mendez
*Bill Pruet
Mary Pat Slavik
**Linda Strong
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 9, 1986
2:00 P.M.
Deputy City Manager Ernest Briones
City Attorney Hal George
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Mayor Jones called the meeting to order in the Council Chamber of City
Hall.
The invocation was given by Reverend Cliff Edge of Oak Park United
Methodist Church, following which the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the
United States was led by Council Member Mendez.
City Secretary Chapa called the roll and verified that a quorum of the
Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the minutes of the Regular
Meeting of November 25, 1986, be approved as presented; seconded by Council
Member Slavik; and passed unanimously by those present.
*Council Member Pruet arrived at 2:06 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones read a resolution commending Mrs. Patty P. Mueller for her
dedication and involvement in the community.
Mrs. Mueller stated that it has been a pleasure to be of service and she is
very grateful for the recognition.
City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote as follows:
RESOLUTION NO.19559
COMMENDING PATTY P. MUELLER FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE CORPUS
CHRISTI PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
ItIRs€rtifg
_,inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 2
The Charter Rule was suspended and the resolution passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, and Slavik voting "aye"; Strong
absent at the time the vote was taken.
**Council Member Strong arrived at 2:11 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones read a resolution commending Mr. Javier P. Chapa for his
efforts on behalf of the City.
Mr. Chapa thanked the Council for their support of the Comprehensive Master
Plan and bond issue, and stated that he hoped more citizens would become
involved in City government.
City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 19560
COMMENDING JAVIER N. CHAPA FOR HIS DEDICATED SERVICE AS CHAIRMAN OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI PLANNING COMMISSION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the resolution passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Deputy City Manager Briones presented the Technology Achievement Award from
the Public Technology Institute for Forecast Model - Debt Service Fund to Juan
Garza, Assistant City Manager, and Ms. Debra Andrews, Director of Finance. He
stated that this award was presented during the National League of Cities
Meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones administered the Oath of Office to the following newly
appointed Board members: Mr. Claude D'Unger, Landmark Commission; Mr. Forrest
W. Smith, C.C. Housing Improvement Corp./Loan Review Committee; and Ms. Judith
E. Oestreich, Private Industry Council.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
A motion was made by Council Member Guerrero, seconded by Council Member
Pruet and passed unanimously by those present; that the following appointments
be confirmed, as discussed during the morning workshop meeting:
a. Citizens Advisory Health Board: Term:
Blanca R. Garcia (City) - Reappointed 11-11-89
,ainutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 3
b. Landmark Commission:
Laura P. Rodriguez - Reappointed 11-20-88
Juan Gomez - Reappointed 11-20-88
Allen Rumme - Reappointed 11-20-88
Gladys Tilley - Reappointed 11-20-88
Manley Springs - Reappointed 11-20-88
Alclair N. Pleasant 11-20-88
Joe L. Williams 11-20-88
Margaret Ramage 11-20-88
Robert Kipp Advisory
c. Corpus Christi Public Library Advisory Board:
Cecile Wavell - Reappointed
Alicia Gallegos -Gomez - Reappointed
Victor Lara Ortegon
J. A. "Tony" Canales
d. Sister City Committee:
11-05-88
11-05-88
11-05-88
11-05-87
Ralph Diaz 9/87
Leon Loeb 9/87
Thomas Tao 9/87
Laura E. Rojo 9/89
Richard L. Bowers (Advisory) 9/89
Ted Schoenberg (Chairman, Yokosuka, Japan Sister City Subcommittee)
e. Planning Commission:
James R. Lynch
f. Civil Service Board and Commission:
Barbara P. Campbell
Food Service Advisory Council:
g•
7-31-88
6-15-89
William K. Snyder (Community -at -large) 6-24-88
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones called for consideration of the following consent motions,
noting that item 6 has been withdrawn:
1. M86-0489
Approving specifications for a five-year contract for the operation of a manual
food and drink concession within the Gabe Lozano, Sr. Golf Course Club House.
..inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 4
2. Withdrawn - See Page 5.
Apprev4mg--tHe-- I.e.t4.en-- €-the-lex#Agnea-Eenrter--Arm Etrcct -I presteneae-predeet
frem-t4 a lk4runEer evit3t-pereiea-ef-ehe-4-9S2-44/4K t -Beadgrotranrr-suet-rea##e-
eeE#ng-gppi4etria4 --f mA.iit-€er-eke t r-a€-r}ght-a€-wey-dor -tire-6reseeewm
Expressway-Extens#enr
3. M86-0490
Accepting the Corpus Christi Beach Piling Removal and Marina Piling Replacement
project, and authorizing total payment of $23,200 to the contractor, Bill N.
Johnson, Inc.
4. M86-0491
Authorizing acquisition of two parcels of land located off McCain Drive at a
cost of $3,675 for the Turkey Creek Drainage Improvements.
5. M86-0492
Granting an easement to Shoreline Terrace, Ltd. to allow the installation of a
portion of two reinforced concrete footings in the public right-of-way of South
Water Street as part of the construction of a parking garage on Lot 2, Shoreline
Terrace Subdivision.
6. Withdrawn - See Page 3.
Relent#ng-Eke-efr].y-+4744- irverd--froom-Ote-el tnEilos•-e€-Eke-McGee-Reeeh-6eneess#en
Steed -and -anther#ang -the -6#ty-Manager -te-reedvere#se-€er-new -b#dss
7. M86-0493
Authorizing the extension of the agreement with Nueces County providing for the
continuation of the City -County Magistrate Program. Funds for this activity are
included in the 1986-87 budget.
8. M86-0494
Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute agreements with
non-profit arts organizations to provide financial assistance totaling $160,000
for various arts and cultural programs as recommended by the Municipal Arts
Commission. Funds are available from the Tourist and Convention Center
activity, general fund reserve being held in Contingency Reserves, and from a
grant from the Texas Commission for the Arts, as approved by the City Council in
the 1986-87 budget.
9. M86-0495
Scheduling a public hearing on December 30, 1986, on the closure of the 14 -foot
wide public alley in Block 16, Chamberlain's Subdivision.
11inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 5
10. M86-0496
Scheduling a public hearing on December 30, 1986, on the closure of two unopened
street stubouts on the south side of Yorktown Boulevard west of South Staples
Street.
11. M86-0497
Scheduling a public hearing for December 30, 1986, on the closure of a 40 -foot
wide by 1,960 -foot long section of County Road 26A east of Cimarron Boulevard.
12. M86-0498
Accepting the School Sidewalk Program, Phase II project; authorizing final
payment of $3,508.01 to T. Garza Construction; and granting the contractor a
47 -day time extension.
Council Member Mendez referred to item 2, reallocation of Voluntary Paving
funds for the Lexington Center Area Street Improvement project for the
acquisition of right-of-way for the Crosstown Extension. He stated that there
are many petitions for paving that were not included in the bond program, and
suggested that the funds proposed for reallocation be used for these possible
projects. Mr. Mendez requested information regarding the number of petitions
that have not been included in any bond issue.
Mayor Jones suggested that this item be withdrawn until the Council
receives a report from staff about the number of voluntary paving petitions that
were not included in bond issues.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that item 2 be withdrawn,
seconded by Council Member Guerrero and passed unanimously with Council Members
Slavik and Strong absent at the time the vote was taken.
Council Member Mendez referred to item 7, City -County Magistrate Program,
and stated that this is a very needed program; it provides continuity; it
expedites cases; it reduces the population at the jail; and he recommends the
program be continued.
There were no comments from the audience; a motion was made by Council
Member Guerrero that items 1, 3 thru 5, and 7 thru 12 be approved; seconded by
Council Member Pruet; and passed unanimously.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones called for consideration of Consent Ordinances 13 thru 20.
Council Member McComb referred to final payment to the contractor for the
Animal Shelter Improvements, and stated that he had been contacted by a
subcontractor on this project.
Assistant City Manager Lontos stated that the contractor must submit an
affidavit that the subcontractors are paid, and until that affidavit is
received, payment is not released.
_,inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 6
Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience.
Mr. Steve Bray stated that he was a subcontractor on the project and he has
not been paid by the contractor.
Mayor Jones stated that this has been noted.
City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote and the following
ordinances were approved:
13. ORDINANCE NO. 19561
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 19274 BY AMENDING SECTION 3 IN ORDER TO ADOPT THE FINAL
ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL SIDEWALK PROGRAM, PHASE II,
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye."
14. ORDINANCE NO. 19562
APPROPRIATING $2,100 FROM THE NO. 262 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY BOND FUND FOR
ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO FACILITATE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR APPLICABLE TO
PROJECT NO. 262-85-1.1, ANIMAL SHELTER IMPROVEMENTS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye."
15. ORDINANCE NO. 19563
APPROPRIATING $2,403.96 FROM THE NO. 295 STORM SEWER BOND FUND FOR ADDITIONAL
FUNDING TO FACILITATE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR, BRACCO CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye."
16. ORDINANCE NO. 19564
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF
PARCEL 71 IN CONNECTION WITH THE NAVY CLEAR ZONES-CABANISS LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECT; APPROPRIATING $758,500; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye."
.,inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 7
17. ORDINANCE NO. 19565
TRANSFERRING $25,000 OUT OF THE 1986-87 TOURIST AND CONVENTION DEVELOPMENT FUND
TO THE PERMANENT ART TRUST FUND; APPROPRIATING $4,000 OUT OF THE PERMANENT ART
TRUST FUND TO PROVIDE SUPPORT TO THE FRIENDS OF CORPUS CHRISTI MUSEUM; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye."
18. SECOND READING
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ROGERS FLOOR CO., INC. FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXI-
MATELY 4.74 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF LOT 8, SECTION 6, FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM
AND GARDEN TRACTS, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID LAND TO LIE
ENTIRELY WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
The Ordinance was read on second reading and passed to third reading as follows:
Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Slavik, and Strong voting
"aye"; Pruet abstaining.
19. SECOND READING
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND E.H. MOORE HOMES, INC. FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXI-
MATELY 16.11 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF LOTS 21, 22, AND 23, SECTION 6, FLOUR BLUFF
AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID
LAND TO LIE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY.
The Ordinance was read on second reading and passed to third reading as follows:
Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong
voting "aye."
20. SECOND READING
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH COOPER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING FOR THE
USE OF GAS DIVISION PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A SINGLE POST SIGN FOR
ADVERTISING.
The Ordinance was read on second reading and passed to third reading as follows:
Jones, Best, Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong
voting "aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
ninutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 8
21. M86-0499
Authorizing City Staff to proceed with the actions necessary to enforce the
Building Standards Board Order on 2861 Lawnview, as modified by the City
Council on May 27, 1986, which required the demolition or repair of the
structure at 2861 Lawnview by November 27, 1986.
Deputy City Manager Briones provided background information and stated that
complaints had been received about the condition of the structures and the
overgrowth; it was investigated by Neighborhood Improvement; they advised the
owner to clean the property; the owner failed to comply; the case was heard by
the Building Standards Board; the Board ordered the property to be cleaned and
the structures to be repaired or demolished; the Council authorized an
additional 90 days from the expiration date of the Board's order; that expired
on November 27; the applicant asked for relief; and the Council asked for a
delay until it could be reconsidered; and that is the case before the Council
today.
Mr. Kelly Elizondo, Director of Community Development, stated that the only
change at the site is that a fence has been erected. He stated that the
property is in need of major repairs; the house is on the ground, as the piers
have eroded; the roofing is in bad shape; there is no foundation; plumbing is
inadequate; and the structure is substandard.
Mr. Elizondo stated that the structures pose a health and safety hazard,
and they are a blight on the neighborhood.
In response to a question from Council Member Guerrero, Mr. Elizondo stated
that repairs would cost approximately $40,000, and that the cost to demolish the
structures would be $750 to $1,500, but there would be no cost for demolition to
the owner, if she meets the guidelines.
Mrs. Pat Duaine, speaking on behalf of Mrs. Irene Roe, the property owner,
stated that a neighbor living behind Mrs. Roe filed the initial complaint
because she wanted the street closed which approaches the back of her property
in order to add land to her property. She stated that she tried to convince
Mrs. Roe to have the property cleaned and the structures demolished, and she
feels the Council should extend the time period to six months and should allow
the buildings to be demolished.
Mayor Jones asked Mrs. Duaine to clarify what she wants.
Mrs. Duaine stated that the City should approach Mrs. Roe about tearing
down the structures for $700.
Mr. Briones stated that Mrs. Roe is facing the order for demolition as of
November 27 and that deadline needs to be relieved.
Aida Naire, 402 Breezeway, stated she owns the property next to Mrs. Roe;
the area has been overgrown for 17 years; there are rats and possums at the
property which get into her house; the structures were to be demolished and
cleaned; and she urged the Council to order this done.
..inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 9
Mr. Russell Wagner, 2862 Austin, referred to the remarks made by Mrs.
Duaine regarding the street closing and stated that that is not true. Mr.
Wagner stated that the police have arrested people at the property for dealing
in drugs and there was also a shooting on the property. He urged the Council to
order the property to be cleaned.
Mayor Jones stated that the property should be cleaned within 30 days and
if not, demolish the structures.
In response to a question from Council Member Slavik, Mr. Elizondo stated
that Mrs. Roe has been advised that the demolition services are free.
Council Member McComb made a motion that the Council support the staff
recommendation to enforce the existing order within ten days; seconded by
Council Member Pruet; and passed unanimously.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
22. M86-0500
Authorizing the City Manager to sign a consent to assignment form to allow
for the transfer of all related benefit services for administration of the
City's self-funded insurance program.
Assistant City Manager Garza explained that James Benefits is divesting
from Fred S. James & Co., under a new organization name "Alta Health Strategies,
Inc."
There were no comments from the audience; a motion was made by Council
Member Mendez that item 22 be approved; seconded by Council Member Strong; and
passed unanimously.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones called for consideration of Ordinance 23, restricting curbside
parking on Gollihar Road, both sides, between Ayers and Carroll Lane.
Council Member Mendez stated that this is a good recommendation, and
Council Member Guerrero inquired if the affected businesses had been notified.
Mr. Lontos stated that he would report to the Council before second
reading, but he is sure the businesses were notified.
There were no comments from the audience; City Secretary Chapa polled the
Council for their vote as follows:
23. FIRST READING
AMENDING CHAPTER 53, TRAFFIC, SECTION 53-252 SCHEDULE III - PARKING PROHIBITED
AT ALL TIMES ON CERTAIN STREETS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION.
_.inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 10
The Ordinance was read for the first time and passed as follows: Jones, Best,
Berlanga, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, Slavik, and Strong voting "aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones announced the following public hearing:
24. Closing the 15 -foot wide public alley between Craig Street and Morgan
Avenue in Block 9, Bayview Subdivision, Unit 2.
Assistant City Manager James K. Lontos located the alley on a map and
informed the Council that the request to close the alley was from the citizen
who owns the corner property. Mr. Lontos stated that the applicant wants to
expand his property through the alley; the neighbors have complained about
people gathering in the alley and the drug traffic that exists there; all City
departments concur that the alley should be closed; there is no access from the
alley to any abutting properties adjacent to the alley; and the staff recommends
the closure and that the applicant be allowed to expand his business, subject to
his platting the property.
Mayor Jones called for objections to the alley closure from members of the
audience.
Mrs. Sharon Longoria spoke in opposition and stated that she owns the
property adjacent to the applicant, Mr. Medina; she has renters living on that
property; they use the alley for access and for parking; she denied that drugs
are a problem in the alley; and stated that she would like for the alley to
remain open.
Mr. Lontos inquired of Mrs. Longoria if there was a garage that opened onto
the alley, and Mrs. Longoria replied that there was not. Mr. Lontos continued
by stating that it is proposed to close the alley but to retain an easement all
the way through except behind Mr. Medina's property.
Mrs. Longoria stated that she has five families renting units on the one
lot, and they use the alley for parking and access to their houses.
Council Member McComb noted that Mrs. Longoria has five units on her
property and inquired about the zoning.
Mr. Lontos indicated that he did not know what the zoning was and stated
that the staff's recommendation was based on the fact that they did not see any
evidence of direct access from the alley and they did not know that there was
any particular use other than people parking in the alley. He stated that if
the Council finds that there is public use, the staff would not recommend
closing the alley.
Council Member McComb again questioned whether or not there might be a
zoning violation on Mrs. Longoria's property.
_.inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 11
Mr. Victor Medina, Jr., 4154 Harry, owner of the property in question,
stated that his tenant, Mr. Bentfield, has actually seen the drug dealers
operating in the alley; alleged that Mr. and Mrs. Longoria are never there to
see this; and that is why he submitted his application. He pointed out that the
alley is not serviceable from Morgan to Craig Street, and he has had difficulty
persuading people to clean the alley. He emphasized the fact that only about
100 feet of the alley is used and expressed the opinion that Mrs. Longoria's
tenants can park in the front of her property.
Ms. Betty Hall, 1602 Morgan, pointed out her property on the transparency.
She stated that Mrs. Longoria's apartments list an address on 14th Street;
within the past two years there have been 4 burglaries, 3 of which were Mrs.
Longoria's tenants; drinking occurs in the alley; and she feels that the tenants
should park on 14th Street which is the posted address.
Mrs. Lois Hall stated that thieves have stolen $10,000 worth of property
from their office on Morgan; trash is thrown from the apartments over the fence
onto the property; for many years the alley was not open; the tenants would park
in her parking spaces and she would have the vehicles towed; and she stated that
the alley should not be open.
Mrs. Longoria spoke again, stating that her tenants are lower-income, but
they are not trash. She stated that the alley closing would not rectify
anything.
Council Member Strong inquired if there was access from the 14th Street
side of the property around back.
Mrs. Longoria stated that there is a driveway and a home; three cars could
park there, but not four. She stated that there is a walkway.
Ms. Hall stated that there appears to be walking access to 14th, and the
City needs to review the parking situation for compliance.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the hearing be closed;
seconded by Council Member Strong; and passed unanimously.
Mayor Jones stated that the City has a policy of encouraging alley closures
if the alley is not used, but in this case the alley is used; therefore, he
cannot support the closure.
Council Member Mendez stated that there are zoning issues involved; the
property contains five buildings and only three parking spaces. He stated that
the tenants need access, even though the property is in non-compliance. He
stated that the drug problem should be handled by the police.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the request to close the
alley in Block 9, Bayview Subdivision, Unit 2 be denied; seconded by Council
Member McComb.
_ inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 12
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Best to table the item so it can be
determined if there are zoning violations.
There was no second to the motion.
Council Member Mendez pointed out that this is a non -conforming use, and
until the property is sold or vacant for one year, it will remain a
non -conforming use.
The motion to deny passed as follows: Jones, Berlanga, McComb Mendez,
Slavik, and Strong voting "aye"; Best voting "no"; Guerrero and Pruet absent at
the time the vote was taken.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
25. Closing the unopened public right-of-way of Smith Drive northwest of River
Forest Drive.
Assistant City Manager Lontos stated that the the O.N. Stevens water intake
is located here; Smith Drive goes into River Forest Drive; the right-of-way is
unimproved and is not open on the ground. He stated that this area has been
used to dump trash. He stated that it is recommended that this portion be
physically closing without abandoning the right-of-way because it might be
utilized in the future. He stated that staff recommends the closure and that
the area be fenced.
Mr. Lontos displayed a transparency and provided the Council with
photographs of the area.
There were no comments from the audience; a motion was made by Council
Member Mendez that the hearing be closed; seconded by Council Member Pruet; and
passed unanimously with Council Members Berlanga, Guerrero, and Strong absent at
the time the vote was taken.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez to physically close Smith Drive;
seconded by Council Member Pruet; and passed with Council Members Berlanga,
Guerrero, and Strong absent at the time the vote was taken.
Mr. Lontos stated that it would not be necessary to pass an ordinance.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
27. Application No. 1086-3T, Dr. Patrick J. Moran: For a proposed change to
the text of the City Zoning Ordinance #6106 as follows:
Amend Article 31, Newly Annexed Territory, by amending Section 31-5 setting
forth a zoning classification of "B-4" General Business District on 7.111
acres of land out of Lot 1, Section 11, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and
Garden Tracts, located on the southeast corner of Saratoga Boulevard and
South Staples Street.
einutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 13
Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning, displayed the area on the zoning
and land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area, and showed
slides of the vicinity.
He stated that two notices were mailed, one was returned in favor; none
were returned against; and the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend
approval.
There were no comments from the audience; a motion was made by Mayor Pro
Tem Best that the hearing be closed; seconded by Council Member Mendez; and
passed unanimously with Council Members Guerrero and Strong absent.
City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their vote as follows:
ORDINANCE 19566
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 31, NEWLY ANNEXED TERRITORY,
BY ADDING TO SECTION 31-5 A SUBSECTION SETTING FORTH ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
SAID AREA OF LAND DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OUT OF LOT 1, SECTION 11, FLOUR BLUFF
AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the ordinance passed as follows: Jones,
Best, Berlanga, McComb, Mendez, Pruet, and Slavik voting "aye"; Guerrero and
Strong absent at the time the vote was taken.
Council Member McComb noted that the zoning case just heard by the Council
was pre -zoning prior to annexation; the vote was unanimous; and no one spoke in
opposition.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
26. Annexation of 73.4 acres of land on Padre Island south of Whitecap
Boulevard, east of Padre Island Drive, west of Gulf of Mexico, and
bordering Nueces County Park No. 1, owned by Lake Padre, Ltd.
Mayor Jones informed the audience that the Council would vote on the
ordinance next week -- no vote would be taken today.
Mr. Wenger displayed a transparency of the area; he stated that this is a
contractual annexation hearing; it is the second public hearing required by
State law; and it consists of approximately 73.4 acres of land which is in the
platting process.
Council Member Pruet pointed out that the Council has the minutes of the
first public hearing and has had access to the tapes. Mr. Wenger agreed.
Mr. Wenger stated that the plat is called Lake Padre; it consists of 99
acres, of which 25 acres are already in the City limits; therefore, the
remaining 73.4 acres are under consideration. He stated that the plat was
submitted and considered by the Planning Commission on September 17; one of the
conditions of the plat was contractual annexation, as provided in Section
ainutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 14
55-111, City Code of Ordinances, which requires annexation prior to obtaining
city water. He stated that the developer requested annexation by contract
submitted on October 27; the hearings were set for December 8 and 9; the plat
includes approximately 16 lots, 8 of which are partly in and out of the City
limits; it includes three -fourth miles of street; and the next action after the
hearing is a three -reading ordinance authorizing execution of a contract by the
City Manager for annexation; and on December 30, the ordinance annexing the
property would be considered.
Council Member Slavik asked why there would be no additional fire or police
needed.
Mr. Wenger stated that there is already
this piece of property. He stated that the
EMS. He stated that utility construction
process that the developer install all the
the City would take over maintenance.
a police beat that can take care of
same condition applies to Fire and
is a requirement of the platting
necessary infrastructure, and then
Council Member Slavik stated that the sewage treatment plant is reaching an
overload situation and asked what the City plans to do.
City Attorney George stated that the City is in litigation regarding Padre
Isles Investment Corporation for a contract to expand the sewer plant; the City
is in the process of enforcing that contract; at one point the plant went to
capacity now; his information is that it is not at capacity; there is a contract
with Padre Isles Investment Corporation; and through bankruptcy proceedings, the
City will enforce that.
Council Member Slavik stated that maintenance of the streets is an expense,
and Mr. Wenger stated that that applies to any development.
Council Member Slavik referred to the timetable for annexation, and Mr.
Wenger stated that December 30 is the earliest date for annexation, and April 7
is the latest.
Council Member McComb stated that the relocation of Whitecap Boulevard,
which was included in the recent bond sale to provide direct access to the
public beach could not be performed if this is not annexed.
Mr. Wenger agreed, noting that the plat was approved subject to annexation.
Mr. Ralph Durden stated that the purpose of a public hearing is to provide
facts to the public and Council; a contractual annexation is a normal occur-
rence, but in this case it is not on Staples Street; therefore, he would like to
present facts.
He stated that an ordinance exists which outlines what must be done; this
occurrence has taken place many times in the last 30 years; the difference
between this and the ones that the Council passed casually is that this has been
before the public for almost 1} years. He stated that this annexation is one
piece of the master plan the Council endorsed in 1985; his clients have spent in
ainutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 15
excess of $1 million in meeting the City requirements and environmental require-
ments; public access can be provided to the beach, and in addition to that,
wetlands can be preserved; there are 26 acres that are already inside the City
limits; it has always been the plan to annex this into the City; the cost to
relocate Whitecap is $1} million of which $700,000 will be provided by the
developer; the total construction cost of Lake Padre is $7 million; none of that
is public money; there is also a $65,000 water fee that must be paid to the
City; the City will have the responsibility of maintaining the streets, but his
reputation as a builder speaks for itself in that regard; tax revenue will be
provided to many governmental entities; he emphasized that he is not proposing a
Reinvestment Zone, and would not support one unless all authorities agreed it
was in their interest; this is the most important thing to happen on the island
in 15 years; $1.2 million in taxes is paid on the island; and Flour Bluff ISD
receives 27% of their revenue from the island. Mr. Durden stated that the
emotions need to be taken out of this issue; this project will produce jobs and
tax revenue; and it will increase tourism.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that comments from the audience
be limited to three minutes per speaker; seconded by Council Member Pruet; and
passed unanimously.
Mr. Glen Lanmon, 11801 Rustlin' Cove, spoke in favor of the contractual
annexation noting the importance of tourism to the City. He stated that this
will also create jobs.
Mr. David Saenz, 1430 17th Street, spoke against the contractual
annexation, noting that the voters rejected the annexation proposal and this
property was included in that proposal.
Mr. Ernest Duncan, 805 MBank, stated that he represents individuals who
have a 38% mineral interest in the property under consideration for contractual
annexation, and these individuals were not party to the application for
contractual annexation. He stated that annexation would have an adverse effect
on that interest.
City Attorney George stated that this is the first time that he is aware of
owners of mineral rights who had a different opinion from surface owners. He
stated that he received a copy of the letter to the Council from Mr. Duncan, and
two attorneys are researching this matter at this time; a definite conclusion
has not been reached; but at this stage, it is not necessary for the mineral
owner to join in the application. He stated that he will have a final opinion
before the vote on the ordinance, but for the purpose of annexation, all that is
needed is the permission of the surface owner.
Mayor Pro Tem Best noted that Mr. Duncan's clients are minority owners.
In response to a question from Council Member McComb, Mr. George stated
that the City's drilling ordinance only applies inside the City limits. He
stated that the drilling ordinance would be applicable to this land after
annexation.
,,inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 16
Mr. Jeff Boudreaux, 5949 Long Creek, spoke in favor of the annexation,
stating that as a developer, he has been in the position of agreeing to annex
property to the City in order to obtain water. He noted that a great deal of
the area on the south side of the City was developed after contractual
annexation had occurred. Mr. Boudreaux pointed out that both parties would
benefit from the proposed annexation -- the developer would be able to obtain
water service; the City would benefit from the increase in the tax base; and
other taxing entities would also receive additional tax income.
Mr. Boudreaux continued by informing the Council that throughout the
planning of this area, everything was accomplished according to City
specifications. He also noted that the City has almost no investment on Padre
Island. He urged that the Council take the initiative to annex this area on
which the Texas Riviera will be located and pointed out that the development
would be quite an asset to Padre Island and to the City.
Mrs. Pat Duaine, 4909 Branscomb, stated that she represents a tremendous
number of citizens in the community and she feels that they are due the proper
respect from the City and are entitled to know what the City is planning to do
in advance. She referred to other incidents that had occurred in the past at
which time citizens were not made aware of the City's plans. She stated that
she felt that it would have been preferable if the City had requested Mr. Ralph
Durden to conduct public hearings to explain his plans for the Island. She
reiterated that this Council has been remiss in keeping the public informed, and
this secrecy has created suspicion among the citizens.
Mrs. Linda Schnaf, owner of Padre Island Boutique, explained that she has
joined the Flour Bluff Business Association; they are 100 percent in favor of
the plans of Lake Padre Limited; and pointed out that there have been many
meetings, hearings and presentations. She continued by stating that there are
many condominiums that have been constructed on the Island; they need to be
sold; and the people on the Island support Mr. Durden's plans because the
proposed development will help everyone on the Island and improve the City.
Mr. Jack Lavers, 14326 Dorsal, stated that it is important
that the residents of Padre Island supported annexation in the
stated that Mr. Nick Nickoloric could not be present, but wanted
Council that the Padre Island Property Owners Association is in
annexation.
Mr. David Guerra, 5317 Alaniz, stated that the annexation
defeated by the voters and the beaches should remain unspoiled.
to recognize
election. He
to remind the
favor of the
election was
Mr. S. J. Johnson, 4941 Andover, stated that he was discouraged that the
mandate of the people was not upheld.
Ms. Elizabeth Walker, 13907 Seahorse, spoke in favor of the annexation.
She stated that the island needs development and it is an important part of
tourism.
:iinutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 17
Mr. Sabu, 14310 Playa del Rey, stated that the annexation is against the
voters will. He stated that the project has serious flaws in that a bridge will
be constructed over Packery Channel and it will force people to go through the
proposed marina if their boat is too large to go under the bridge. He stated
that the cut would have a dog -leg and the direction is against the natural flow
of the wave action; therefore it would constantly shoalup and become a
maintenance burden. He stated that there are four or five natural cuts within a
few miles of this development, and if the island is going to be cut, it should
be done properly. He stated that he is in favor of annexation and development,
but not as it stands because of the flaws in the project.
Mr. Hank Snyder, 9 Rockcreek, stated that he was in favor of the annexation
election. He stated that Mr. J.E. O'Brien felt that the annexation election
involved too much land and should be cut to smaller size -- that is what's being
done.
Mr. Larry Latour, 13802 Top Sail, stated that he is in agreement with the
annexation. He noted that this annexation involves only 1/400th of what the
election involved. He stated that there have been 51 annexations since 1984, 9
this year, and none were opposed.
Mr. Cheyenne Eichelberger, 2206 Saxony, stated that he was speaking as a
citizen and not a representative of the Planning Commission. He stated that
most of the questions at last night's public hearing were about the cost, and
those have been answered. He stated that there are many things that could be
done to improve communications between the citizens and City government. He
stated that telephone hotlines can be an effective vehicle for public opinion.
Mr. Andy Agan, 3105 Sylvan Crest, stated that this annexation is the first
step towards providing another source of income for the City.
Mr. Bob Shattuck, Executive Director of the Builders Association, stated
that the Association supports the annexation of the Lake Padre property. He
stated that contractual annexation is a standard procedure in the development
process; it is as much a standard as platting and zoning; and development cannot
take place without it. He stated that to not allow annexation, is to discourage
development. He stated that it is a mistake to view the election results as a
mandate from the people that Padre Island never develop. He pointed out that
the reason the tax base remains low is because of growth and development.
Mr. Bill Cole, 1337 York, stated that the annexation would create a
financial black hole where tax dollars could disappear. He stated that the
Council has made an enormous miscalculation by underestimating the voters'
intelligence, and cautioned not to add to it by underestimating their tenacity.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the hearing be closed;
seconded by Council Member Guerrero; and passed unanimously.
Mayor Jones read the following statement:
iinutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 18
The purpose of annexation is primarily a process by which taxes
are equalized. When a piece of property contiguous to a City enjoys
the benefits of being in the City, that property should be required to
support the total City with a payment of taxes.
The Annexation laws in the State of Texas are generally
considered to be a model for the Nation and prevent such conditions
developing such as have occurred in St. Louis, Missouri, which is
surrounded by at least 20 separate political subdivisions with their
own school systems, City administrations, ad infinitum.
To build a wall around the City of Corpus Christi means that the
existing taxpayers will have to bear the increasing costs of govern-
ment as the years go by. The tax rate in the City of Corpus Christi
in 1978 was 80C per $100 of assessed valuation. The tax rate since
1983 has been 56.5c. This decrease in the tax rate has been possible
only because of the growth in the tax base which was made possible by
annexations, new construction, and increased value of existing
properties. The bond rating by Moody's for the current bond sale
points out that the market value of taxable property is as follows:
"the market value of taxable property has increased significantly to
$6.7 billion in 1986 from $3.2 billion in 1980."
The argument that the voters turned down this annexation is
faulty in that this annexation proposal is for approximately 73.4
acres whereas the annexation proposal was for several times that
amount. Corpus Christi has historically taken in major tracts of land
under development under the same provision proposed in this case, and
most of the development south of Saratoga has been annexed using this
provision of the Texas Annexation Law.
Finally, in summary, it is my opinion that the best interest of
the taxpayers of Corpus Christi will be served by this voluntary
annexation and that we, as a Council, should not deny the benefit of
increased tax revenues that will accrue to Molina, Calallen, Flour
Bluff and every other section of the City.
Council Member McComb asked for staff comment concerning the criteria that
has been met in order to bring this contractual annexation to this point.
Mr. Briones stated that all of the conditions of the annexation have been
met, although there are some conditions in the platting process that will be met
after contractual annexation takes place.
Mr. McComb inquired if these are the same conditions that are met on a
non-discriminatory basis by any developer that wants to be annexed, and Mr.
Briones replied in the affirmative.
Council Member McComb provided the Council and the news media with an
information packet regarding previous contractual annexations. He displayed a
map which indicated the lands that have been contractually annexed since 1980,
and stated that the concerns that have been expressed during the public hearing
have never been expressed on any of these contractual annexations. He pointed
out that Ordinances 18 and 19 on the agenda were second readings of contractual
annexations and were passed unanimously by the Council; there were no
minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 19
comments, pro or con, from the audience; and many of these people were present
during that vote. He stated that he cannot support rejecting the request for
annexation because the developer has met all the contractual agreement
requirements that the City has presented. He stated that 51 parcels have been
contractually annexed since 1980; none have been denied because they've met the
criteria that's been established by either the Planning Commission or by
ordinance; and he does not feel that the Council can reject this and place the
City in a position of litigation. He stated that the election in August
concerned the annexation of the National Seashore and State Park. He stated
that from an ethical, legal, technical, and moral standpoint the Council has no
choice but to accept the contractual annexation.
Council Member Slavik stated that the previous contractual annexations do
not apply because this is an unusual case because of the annexation election and
there has been so much confusion.
Council Member Slavik made a motion that this item be added to the election
on April 4. There was no second.
Council Member Slavik stated that this is a bad precedent and she will not
vote for it.
Council Member Mendez stated that those kinds of statements contribute to
the misconception by the public. He stated that over 2,624 acres have been
contractually annexed since 1980 and those are the facts that should be looked
at. He stated that certain individuals should not be treated differently; the
election cannot be associated with this contractual annexation; the Council
should look at what is best for the City; and he pointed out that there has not
been any opposition to contractual annexations in the past. He stated that
everyone should be treated the same, whether they are on Padre Island or on
FM 624.
Council Member Strong stated that she agrees with the comments made by
Mayor Jones and Council Members Mendez and McComb. She stated that the Council
cannot discriminate against one developer when the City Charter states that
annexation is a requirement to obtain water.
Council Member Mendez stated that this has been discussed for years; the
Council approved the Riviera Project Master Plan; and it's time to move forward.
Mayor Jones stated that the ordinance authorizing execution of the contract
will be read for the first of three readings on December 16.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
City Attorney George informed the Council that Mr. Don Butler, CP&L rate
consultant, has stated that there is no reason for the City to be involved in
the current proceedings; therefore, there is no reason to intervene.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 20
Mayor Jones called for petitions from the audience.
Dr. Howard Tirschwell, Chairman of the Sister City Committee, introduced
the members of the Veracruz Subcommittee, Mr. Ted Schoenberg, Ms. Alma Meinrath,
Melba Jiminez, and Joe Morales.
Dr. Tirschwell stated that four Council Members from Veracruz will be
visiting on December 13, 14, and 15. He stated that they would like to return
the hospitality the members received when they visited Veracruz by holding three
events. He stated that approximately $600 to $900 is needed.
He stated that their budget is $11,800; they wanted to send 10 students to
Veracruz; airfare has increased; therefore they need additional funds to conduct
the events for the visiting Council Members.
Mayor Jones stated that in his opinion, only four students should be sent.
Council Member Berlanga stated that there are 10 schools and they did not
want to omit anyone.
In response to a question from Mayor Jones, Dr. Tirschwell stated that the
money for entertainment would have to be taken from the money designated for the
exchange program.
A motion was made by Council Member McComb that the money be used from the
budget for the welcoming and reduce the number of students in the exchange
program.
Dr. Tirschwell stated that there would not be enough money left if this
were done.
There was no second.
Council Member Mendez stated that the money can be found, noting that there
needs to be a welcoming.
Mayor Jones inquired if Dr. Tirschwell had made a commitment to Tampico to
send ten students, and Dr. Tirschwell replied no, but it was discussed.
Dr. Tirschwell stated that there will be an entertainment event at his home
on Sunday night and invited the Council.
Council Member Slavik suggested that Dr. Tirschwell contact Jack Bell for
food arrangements.
A motion was made by Council Member Pruet that an expenditure up to $750 be
authorized at the City's expense; seconded by Council Member Berlanga; and
passed unanimously with Council Member Strong absent at the time the vote was
taken.
Mr. David Saenz, 1430 17th Street, stated that the vote on the annexation
did not make any difference.
inutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 9, 1986
Page 21
There being no further business to come before the Council, on motion by
Council Member Pruet; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Best and passed unanimously; the
meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m., December 9, 1986.
/td
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of the City of Corpus Christi of December
9, 1986, which were approved by the City Council on December 16, 1986.
WITNESSETH MY HAND AND SEAL, this the (� day of /10 .
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
City of Corpus Christi, Texas