HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 10/12/1999r
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the
Regular Council Meeting of the City of Corpus Christi of October 12, 1999, which were approved
by the City Council on October 19, 1999.
WITNESSETH MY HAND AND SEAL, this 19th day of October, 1999.
SEAL
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
9:09 a.m.
PRESENT
Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Rex A. Kinnison
Council Members:
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper*
Henry Garrett
Dr. Arnold Gonzales
Betty Jean Longoria
John Longoria
Mark Scott
City Staff:
City Manager David R. Garcia
City Attorney James R. Bray Jr.
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Recording Secretary Rachelle P. Ramon
Mayor Neal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
The invocation was delivered by Rev. E.F. Bennett, following which the Pledge of Allegiance
to the United States flag was led by Council Member Colmenero.
City Secretary Chapa called the roll and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council
and the required charter officers were present to conduct the meeting. Mayor Neal called for approval
of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of September 28, 1999. A motion was made and
passed to approve the minutes as presented.
City Manager Garcia then introduced Mr. George Noe, the new Deputy City Manager, who
said he has been involved in municipal government for about 23 years, 14 of which he spent in San
Antonio and four in College Station.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 3, consideration of the developmental process for the
proposed Year 2000 capital improvement bond program. City Manager Garcia explained that major
capital investments need to be made in the community, and the only way to do that is through a
voter -approved bond program.
Mr. Garcia said the first step is to determine how the public participation process will be
structured. He said that during the first discussion of the bond issue on September 21, 1999, the
Council indicated that they wanted community-based participation. Consequently, staff is proposing
to hold eight hearings --five district hearings and three city-wide hearings. He said there are three
options as to who should conduct the hearings: city staff, the Planning Commission (with assistance
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 2
from city staff), or the City Council (also with assistance from staff).
Mr. Garcia said staff was suggesting the following sites for the hearings: District 1 -Northwest
Senior Center; District 2 -Bayfront Plaza Convention Center; District 3 -Foy Moody High School;
District 4 -Haas Middle School; District 5-Kaffie Middle School; and three city-wide hearings at
Flour Bluff High School, Northwest Senior Center, and the City Council Chambers. He said at the
public hearings staff would provide a list of projects that were already included in the capital
improvement program (CIP) and receive input from the citizens about what projects they think
should be included. The next step would be to identify the scope and costs of the projects not already
in the CIP and to present that list to the Council with financing alternatives.
The City Manager then described the capital policies the Council had previously adopted, and
he discussed criteria that can be used to evaluate the projects for consideration in the bond issue.
Those criteria include fiscal impact, health and safety effects, community economic effects,
environmental effects, disruption and inconvenience caused, feasibility, implications of deferring
a particular project, and intergovernmental effects. Mr. Garcia said the Council would need to direct
the process for educating the public on identified community needs, and obtaining comments and
additional recommendations from boards and commissions, civic groups, and the Planning
Commission. The final steps would involve meeting with other jurisdictions, composing the ballot,
and setting the date for the bond election.
A discussion ensued about the public hearings that would be held and ways to educate the
public about the capital projects. Several Council members stated that they would like to hold more
than one hearing in their district and possibly at different sites than those recommended by staff.
Council Member John Longoria said he did not think that sufficient input would be garnered through
the public hearing process being proposed. He said that in the past surveys were distributed to
citizens to gain their ideas and he suggested that hearings he held in conjunction with civic group
meetings.
*Council Member Cooper arrived at 9:50 a.m.
Mr. Angel Escobar, Director of Engineering Services, then gave a presentation on the current
capital improvement program and additional needs that have been identified. Examples of current
city-wide projects are: Park and Recreation--renovation/development of existing park land ($4.5
million), youth sports facility improvements ($5 million); Streets --street reconstruction/rolled curb
and gutter improvements ($80.3 million), neighborhood street improvements/voluntary paving
program ($3.04 million), street lighting improvements/residential and arterial streets ($3.15 million),
and traffic signal improvements ($8.39 million); Public Health Facilities --fire and police public
safety training center ($3 million), animal control facility ($2.1 million), and vector control building
($530,000).
Mr. Escobar said the current capital improvement projects broken out by Council districts
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 3
are as follows: District 1-418,364,000; District 2-484,075,000; District 3-46,774,000; District 4--
$19,403,000; and District 5--$40,067,000; fora total of $168,683,000. The total of city-wide projects
is $114,564,000, and the projects in which no locations have been sited total $5,630,000, for a grand
total of $288,877,000. Council members questioned why the projects had been broken out by
Council district, and Mr. Escobar explained that that was done for informational purposes only.
Additional needs identified are: overlay of arterials, major street lighting, major sidewalk
reconstruction, ADA compliance in sidewalks and administrative facilities, and an 8,000 to 10,000 -
seat arena.
Responding to Mayor Neal, Mr. Escobar discussed the process and time line for having
projects included in the five-year CIP and how that is impacted by the state's and federal
government's planning processes. The Mayor pointed out that the District Engineer of the Texas
Department of Transportation (TXDOT) said no additional funds will be available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization for projects that are outside the scope of financing for the next
five years. In response to Council Member Scott, Mr. Escobar and Mr. Joe Montez, Budget Director,
discussed projects that are in the CIP and that are financed by other sources.
The next presentation was made by Ms. Mary Sullivan, Director of Finance, regarding
financing options for the proposed bond election, which could involve using property taxes, sales
taxes, or a combination of both. With the first option, property tax rates would be set each year to
satisfy debt service requirements on the new debt. Actual tax rates would depend on the amount of
projects approved, the timing of bond sales to support construction schedules, and property values.
Ms. Sullivan said that for the purposes of her presentation, the following assumptions were
used: $100 million of projects approved; $20 million bonds sold per year for five years; 5.6% interest
rate; maximum 20 years maturity; 63% coverage of next year's debt service; and 1% growth in
property values. She then reviewed charts showing the city's existing debt on its general obligation
and certificate of obligation bonds, which were divided into existing debt that is supported by
property taxes and debt which is self-supporting (i.e., airport, golf centers, marina). She also
discussed projected property tax rates for debt service with a $100 million bond election, comparing
the total with levelized new debt service versus the total with "backloaded" new debt service.
Ms. Sullivan also discussed projected increases in property tax rates at various growth rates
(0%, 1%, 2% and 3% growth). Responding to Council members' questions, Mr. Garcia said part of
the way the city is able to maintain a level rate is through its coverage ratios and reserves; however,
the actual property tax revenue is set every year by the tax assessor.
The Finance Director then reviewed the sales tax approach to the bond issue. She said a sales
tax of 1/8, 218, or 3/8 cents could be approved by voters for economic development projects. She
said it would require that an economic development corporation be established to administer the
revenues and expenditures. Also, the city could fund the projects directly from the sales tax revenues
or finance the projects and use the sales tax to fund the debt service. She noted that 2 cents of the
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 4
sales tax is available for local use. The current break down is: city - 1 cent, RTA -'h cent, and Crime
Control District - 1/8 cent, which leaves three 1/8 -cent increments available. She added that each 1/8
cent will bring in approximately $3.8 million (based on current budget figures). Ms. Sullivan
cautioned against using all of the remaining 3/8 cents left. She also referred to a chart showing the
estimated dollar amount of projects that can be supported by a sales tax increase. For example, a 1/8
cent increase could result in $40 million in projects, with estimated annual principal and interest of
$3.6 million.
Under the third option, Ms. Sullivan said a combination of property taxes and sales taxes
could be used to finance the projects, which she said is more complicated and must be clearly
communicated on the ballot.
Mr. Jeff Leuschel, bond counsel, gave a legal overview of the general obligation (GO) bond
election procedures. He said the city can have an election for capital improvements and the
proposition requires the city to levy a tax in support of the payment of the debt service on the bonds
that are approved by the citizens. He said propositions must be clearly stated and disparate projects
cannot be combined in one proposition (i.e., streets and parks). He said a general obligation bond
election is not confined to uniform election dates; however, a sales tax election would be. Mr.
Leuschel said there is a 40 -year limitation on the repayment of GO bonds. He also discussed the
possibility of using a note program if the propositions are approved by the citizens (although much
analysis would have to be undertaken for that option to be available). And he discussed publication
requirements, including the possibility of utilizing the city's Web site to publicize the election.
City Attorney Bray then discussed regulations concerning sales tax elections. He noted that
the question had been raised whether or not specific capital improvement projects can be financed
with sales tax revenues. Mr. Bray said sales tax proceeds can be used for operation and maintenance
expenses of the facilities. He said although staff would need to talk with the Attorney General's
Office in more depth, they believe that the ballot proposition could be structured so as to separately
present the projects under the auspices of a 4A corporation, which he further explained.
Council Member Gonzales asked if the voters could be given a choice on where to locate an
arena. Mr. Leuschel replied that the City of Laredo is considering the same issue. He said they will
have to explore it with the Attorney General's Office before language can be presented to the voters.
Mayor Neal referred to a summary of projected property tax rates prepared by Ms. Sullivan.
He said that according to the column entitled "tax rate with 1% growth (cents per $100 of taxable
value)," incorporating a $100 million bond election would substantially raise the tax rate in the out
years. He asked whether the tax increase would be cut in half if the amount of the bonds were cut
in half, and Ms. Sullivan replied that, approximately speaking, they would be. The Mayor pointed
out that over the next several years the Council will have to make some major General Fund
reallocations just to service existing debt. In light of the amount of existing debt, he questioned
whether it would be viable to have a $50 million property tax program, and he suggested that a
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 5
combination of property and sales tax financing methods may be more feasible. In reply to Council
Member Scott, Mr. Leuschel and Mr. Bray further discussed legal issues related to a sales tax
election.
Council Member Kinnison asked what type of capital improvement program can be
implemented without a bond election or tax increase, and Ms. Sullivan replied that it would be very
minimal. Mr Kinnison said one of the charts prepared by the Finance Department indicates that for
FY 2000-01, due to the city's debt structure, there will be a $4 million effect on the General Fund.
Further discussion followed about the summary of projected property tax rates.
Mayor Neal questioned what steps the Council will take next. Dr. Gonzales made a motion
to instruct staff to continue to develop information for the Council and citizens regarding holding
a combined property tax/sales tax bond election. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Longoria.
Responding to Mr. Kinnison, Mr. Bray said that a combined property tax/sales tax election
could be held in August or November 2000 (January 2000 would be too soon). City Secretary Chapa
polled the Council for their votes on Dr. Gonzales' motion, and it passed unanimously.
Mayor Neal said staff needed to provide the Council with additional information on the bond
election so they can discuss it further next month. Mr. Garcia asked if the Council wanted staff to
design the public participation process, and the Mayor said they should wait on that aspect of it.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal announced three closed sessions, pursuant to Texas Government Code Section
551.071, regarding the following: legal advice as to the contracts related to the Columbus Ships, with
possible action thereon in open session; collective bargaining with Corpus Christi Firefighters
Association, with possible action thereon in open session; and legal advice as to the contract with
Nueces County and the Regional Transportation Authority for the Mobile Data Terminal/Automated
Vehicle Location System, with possible action thereon in open session.
The Mayor said the closed session would not be held regarding the following cases against
the City of Corpus Christi et al in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Corpus Christi Division: William Bussey No. C-99-171, John Betz No. C-99-133, Arnulfo
Guerrero, Jr. No. C-99-143, Mark Schauer No. C-99-144, Charles Bartels No. C-99-158, William
Livingston No. C-99-159, Duane Pacheco No. C-99-168, and Gilbert Garcia No. C-99-170.
The Council went into closed session. The Council returned from closed session.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal reconvened the Council meeting and read several proclamations that were listed
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 6
on the agenda, including a presentation of gifts from Hagen, Germany by Council Member Cooper.
The Mayor then referred to the board and committee appointments on the day's agenda, and the
following appointments were made:
C.C. Downtown Management District
Willard Hammonds Sr.
Nueces County Tax Appraisal District
Clif Moss (Reappointed)
Paul Grivich
Sister City Committee
Edna Brown
Mayor Neal called for petitions from the audience.
Port of Corpus Christi Authority
Bernard Paulson (Reappointed)
Ethics Commission
Garry Bradford (Reappointed)
Frank Tompkins II (Reappointed)
Rev. Derrick Reaves
■
Mayor Glenn Martin, of the City of Port Aransas, addressed the issue of annexation of the
four miles of Mustang Island located between the cities of Corpus Christi and Port Aransas. He said
he wished to open the lines of communication so he can explain in detail at another time their plan
for that area. He noted that beachfront property is very expensive to maintain and service; their city
budget estimates it to be $100,000 per mile. He said due to their proximity to that area and the
services that are already in place, Port Aransas is economically positioned to annex it at this time,
and he said they could share revenues with Corpus Christi. He said a portion of the hotel/motel tax
could go to the Convention and Visitors Bureau of Corpus Christi to promote area tourism; in
addition, Port Aransas is willing to participate in the elevation of the JFK Causeway. Mayor Martin
also discussed ways in which Mustang Island more closely identifies with Port Aransas.
Ms. Jan Weaver spoke on behalf of a newly formed organization entitled Save Our Ships
(SOS). She said their purpose is to see that the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria remain in Corpus
Christi, showcased in the water, as historical sailing replicas, which represent the city's cultural
heritage in accordance with the original Spanish philosophy and educational mission. She said the
replicas provide educational opportunities, are of historical importance, and are important for
tourism. She noted that they are the only three replicas in the world to have sailed across the Atlantic
and to have duplicated Columbus' voyage. She said that with proper management, marketing, and
displays, the ships can become viable.
Mr. Ramon Hernandez, Co -Chairman of SOS, described how he became involved with the
Columbus ships. He said they are determined to develop inclusive, grassroots support for the ships
as they initially had when they were first brought to Corpus Christi. He said they are asking for time
to develop a long-term plan to fund the ships and make the project successful.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 7
Mr. J.E. O'Brien, 4130 Pompano, referred to Mr. Leuschel's comments earlier in the meeting
concerning voter -approved bonds for specific projects. He asked if Mr. Leuschel's comments reflect
an illegal action regarding the Council's purchase of the CPL building for use as a police station. He
said any future bond election will be a hard -sell for the Council. Council Member Scott pointed out
that the CPL building purchase was made by a previous City Council.
Mr. Jimmie Till, 6034 Lost Creek, said the people on Mustang Island near Port Aransas did
not ask to be annexed by Corpus Christi. He suggested that Corpus Christi officials work with Port
Aransas officials on the annexation issue and wait until the new annexation laws are passed.
Ms. Janet Rice, 118 Southern St., said she was Chairperson of the Corpus Christi
Quincentenary Commission which helped bring the Columbus ships to the city. She said the
Columbus Fleet is a cultural activity with incredible potential, but if past mistakes are not learned
from, the ships will not thrive and they should be returned to Spain.
Dr. John Thom, 3061 S. Staples, proposed that a "Friends of the Fleet" organization be
established to help fund the Columbus ships. He said he believes the money needed to pay off the
ships' debt can be raised but the entire organization needs to run like a business. He asked the
Council to ask the Spanish delegation for a 90 -day delay so they can raise the funds for the ships.
Mr. Mike Baker, 4641 Gayle Circle, encouraged the Council to keep a close scrutiny on how
the Wesley Seale Dam bond monies are utilized and how the dam repair work progresses. He said
if that occurs, more than likely at the end of the project the city will have $3 million to $6 million
left to use for utility projects or to help retire the dam bond debt.
Mr. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, criticized the operation of the Columbus ships under the
direction of Mr. Alex Harris, saying the process was not inclusive and diverse. He said if the private
sector wants the ships, the private sector should support them.
Ms. Karen Heist, 3125 Catcay, said she and her son have been involved with the Columbus
Fleet for 2'/2 years, including taking sailing school classes and deepening their appreciation of the
history associated with the ships.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 4-20). Council members
and audience members requested that Items 13, 14, 19, and 20 be withheld for discussion. City
Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes and the following were passed:
4. M99-349
Motion approving the purchase of 1,000 galvanized sign posts, 500 yellow sign posts, and
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 8
1,500 anchor sets in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0013-00, from Northwest Pipe
Company, Houston, Texas, based on the low total bid of $34,740. The posts and anchors
will be used by the Traffic Division of the Street Services Department.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
5. M99-350
Motion approving a supply agreement with Bio -Aquatic Testing, Inc., Carrollton, Texas for
biomonitoring in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0173-99 based on low bid for an
estimated annual expenditure of $16,010. The term of the supply agreement will be for
twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods
subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. This
biomonitoring testing will be performed for the six Wastewater Treatment Plants. Funds
have been budgeted in FY 99-00 by the Wastewater Department.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
6. M99-351
Motion approving a supply agreement with Safe Tire Disposal, San Antonio, Texas for used
tire disposal service in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0176-99 based on low bid for
an estimated annual expenditure of $75,900. The term of the supply agreement will be for
twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods
subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have
been budgeted by Solid Waste Services and Maintenance Services in FY99-00.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
7. M99-352
Motion approving the purchase of an inspection boat and trailer from Gulf Coast Marine,
Inc., Corpus Christi, Texas to be used by the Water Department at the Wesley E. Seale Dam,
based on low bid, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0015-00 for a total of $18,173.
Funds have been budgeted by the Water Department for FY 99-00.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 9
8. M99-353
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract in
the amount of $248,799 with Don L. Owen, Inc. of Balch Springs, Texas for the Gollihar
Elevated Storage Tank Rehabilitation project.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
9. M99-354
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract in
the amount of $505,415 with Texas Bridge of Humble, Texas for the Alameda Elevated
Storage Tank Rehabilitation project.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
10. M99-355
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract for engineering
services in the amount of $51,400 with Southern Ecology Management Inc. for
environmental and regulatory services associated with the J.C. Elliott and Westside Landfills
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
11. M99-356
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the
Engineering Services contract with Goldston Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $77,708 to
expand the scope of services of the Laguna Madre Service Area Collection System
Rehabilitation Project to include additional services for Closed Circuit Television Inspection.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
12. M99-357
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to the
engineering services contract with Urban Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $205,260 for the
Broadway Service Area Collection System Rehabilitation project.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 10
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
15.a. ORDINANCE NO. 023788
Ordinance appropriating $20,000 from the ClearSource, Inc., Franchise Application Fee in
the No. 1020 General Fund to fund additional services of the Baller-Herbst Law Group, P.C.
to assist the City of Corpus Christi in the cable television franchise granting and renewal
process; amending Ordinance No. 023702, which adopted the FY 99-00 Budget by adding
$20,000 to the No. 1020 General Fund.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
15.b. M99-360
Motion amending Motion M98-404 which authorized a professional services agreement with
Adrian Herbst, the Bailer Herbst Law Group, P.C., to increase the estimated cost by $20,000
for additional services required in connection with the cable franchise application by
ClearSource, Inc.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
16. RESOLUTION NO. 023789
Resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings by the City to condemn fee simple title
to Lot 1R, Block 15, Edgewater Terrace Subdivision, from the owner, Leona Estes, to
construct street and utility improvements as part of the Spur 3, Phase 2 project and for other
municipal purposes.
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
17. RESOLUTION NO. 023790
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to apply for a grant of $133,900
from the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division to fund a project to prevent minors from
purchasing and consuming alcohol by using police officers on overtime.
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 11
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
18. ORDINANCE NO. 023791
Ordinance appropriating $8,000 from an anonymous donation in the No. 1020 General Fund
to fund a basketball program at Ben Garza Gym; amending Ordinance No. 023702, which
adopted the FY99-00 Budget by adding $8,000 to the No. 1020 General Fund.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 13, new landfill design phase services.
Mr. J.E. O'Brien questioned the difference in the amount being appropriated ($769,213) and
the amount being spent ($579,260). He also referred to the definition in the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) of the Public Health and Safety Bond Fund, which was related to the
construction of a police station and Municipal Court facilities. He questioned what those facilities
have to do with the landfill.
Mr. Kevin Stowers, Acting Assistant Director of Engineering Services, said the additional
funds being appropriated will be used toward the additional cost of the construction phase and
materials testing contracts. Mayor Neal asked if the additional monies can be appropriated at a later
date when they are needed, and Mr. Stowers replied that they can be. Responding to Mr. O'Brien's
question about the bond fund, Ms. Sullivan said the CAFR mistakenly did not list several other bond
issues that are part of the Public Health and Safety Bond Fund.
Mr. Foster Edwards, representing the Corpus Christi Association of Realtors, said their
organization is concerned about the lack of economic development in the city. He suggested that the
Council aggressively look for interest monies that could be placed in an economic development fund.
City Attorney Bray replied that interest on bond monies have to be spent for the bond purpose.
Responding to Council Member Kinnison, Mr. Tom Utter, Assistant City Manager for
Development Services, said the comprehensive plan for the new landfill and the closure of Elliott
Landfill was brought to the Council in 1995, and each year since then a financing plan has been
brought to the Council for minor modifications. He noted that the useful life of the Elliott Landfill
has been lengthened, which has saved the city some money in preparation for the new landfill.
Mr. Kinnison made a motion to amend the ordinance to appropriate $579,260 of interest
earnings (rather than $769,213); seconded by Mr. Scott. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 12
their votes on the motion to amend, and it passed unanimously. He polled the Council for their votes:
13.a. ORDINANCE NO. 023786
Ordinance appropriating $579,260 of interest earnings in the No. 3357 Public Health and
Safety Bond Fund for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed, as amended, by the
following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J.
Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
13.b. M99-358
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 7 for
engineering services and assignment of contract to Shiner, Moseley & Associates, Inc. in the
amount of $579,260 for design phase services for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 14, IRS arbitrage rebate.
Mr. J.E. O'Brien questioned whether this is the first year the city will start paying the
arbitrage and whether it will be for years to come. He added that in the budget the interest earnings
are not a true picture of the actual available revenue if the city has to pay the arbitrage.
City Manager Garcia pointed out that part of the reason the city is having to pay arbitrage is
due to the excess interest earnings from investing lower -yield municipal bonds into higher -yield
taxable securities. Ms. Sullivan said the arbitrage is paid on every fifth anniversary date of the bonds.
City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
14.a. ORDINANCE NO. 023787
Ordinance appropriating $139,121.58 from the Unreserved Fund Balance of the No. 4240
Capital Improvements Fund to pay the arbitrage rebate to the Internal Revenue Service;
adding $139,121.58 to the No. 4240 Capital Improvements Bond Fund.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 13
14.b. M99-359
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to rebate $139,121.58 to the U.S.
Treasury for the Series 1994A bonds issued for utility improvements as required by the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, Section 148(F) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 19, canine unit.
Council Member Garrett asked if the $1,540 was to create an additional canine unit. Ms. Pat
Eldridge, Management Assistant in the Police Department, said these funds are for expenditures not
included in the General Fund. She added that in two months there will be a canine unit in operation
through the Crime Control District. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes:
19. ORDINANCE NO. 023 792
Ordinance appropriating $1,540 in the No. 6010 Trust Fund - Police Canine Unit for Police
Canine Unit expenditures; amending Ordinance No. 023702 which adopted the FY99-00
budget by adding $1,540 to the No. 6010 Trust Fund - Police Canine Unit.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 20, hospital zone.
Council Member Scott asked if the ordinance approved by the Council on first reading
included a reduction of the length of the hospital zone itself. Mr. David Seiler, Traffic Engineer, said
it does include the reduction. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
20. ORDINANCE NO. 023793
Amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53 - Traffic, Article VIII - Schedules, Section
53-255, Schedule VI, amending the times for the Alameda Street Hospital Zone speed limit;
providing for penalties.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 14
The foregoing ordinance passed on second reading by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero,
Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal referred to Item 21, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the
public hearing on the following right-of-way closure. He called for comments from the audience, and
there were none. Council Member Scott made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by
Council Member Cooper, and passed. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes:
21. ORDINANCE NO. 023794
Ordinance closing and abandoning a 3,163 -square foot portion of San Antonio Street right-
of-way north of the Alta Plaza Street right-of-way, between Lot 3, Block 2, Nolte
Subdivision and Lot 10, Block 1, Alta Plaza Subdivision, subject to compliance with the
specified conditions, and the owners, Brooke Sween -McGloin , Patrick McGloin, and Gene
Spencer, replatting the property within 180 days at their expense.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye";
Colmenero absent.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
*
Mayor Neal referred to Item 22, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the
public hearing on the following zoning case:
22. Case No. 999-2, Havley Builders Inc.: A change of zoning from an "R -1A" One -family
Dwelling District to an "A-2" Apartment House District on Edgewater Terrace, Block 1, east
half of Lot 9, located on the north side of Ocean Drive, approximately 500 feet west of South
Alameda Street,
City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the
"A-2" Apartment House District. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Council
Member Garrett made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Council Member Scott, and
passed. Responding to a question from Mr. Scott, Mr. Michael Gunning, Director of Planning and
Development, said the adjacent property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Robinson, are opposed to the
rezoning because they want to ensure that a quality development occurs on the subject lot as well
as the vacant lots to the east.
Council Member Betty Jean Longoria asked if there were any homes between the subject
property and the restaurant on the comer. Mr. Gunning said there is one single-family residence on
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 15
Lot 12-R to the east and two vacant lots next to the restaurant. He noted that Lots 10 and 11 are
currently zoned "A-2" and the owner could build 25 units on those lots as a matter of right. However,
the applicant's intention is to rezone the remaining half of Lot 9 and build a total complex of five
units. Mr. Gunning added that Lot 9-A would have to be replatted and there is a minimum setback
requirement of 10 feet from the adjoining property line. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes:
22. ORDINANCE NO. 023795
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Hayley Builders, Inc., by changing the
zoning map in reference to east half of Lot 1, Block 1, Edgewater Terrace from "R -1A" One -
family Dwelling District to "A-2" Apartment House District; amending the Comprehensive
Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
*************
Mayor Neal referred to Item 23, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the
public hearing on the following zoning case:
23. Case No. 999-3, William R. Hayward: A change of zoning from an "F -R" Farm -Rural
District to a `B-4" General Business District on Wade Riverside Subdivision, 1.0 acre out
of Section 4, located on the southwest corner of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and County
Road 73.
City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the
"B-4" General Business District. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Council
Member Cooper made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Council Member
Colmenero, and passed. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
23. ORDINANCE NO. 023796
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by William R. Hayward, by changing the
zoning map in reference to 1.0 acre out of Section 4, Wade Riverside Subdivision, from "F-
R" Farm -Rural District to "B-4" General Business District; amending the Comprehensive
Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 16
* * * * * * * * * *
*
**
Mayor Neal referred to Item 24, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the
public hearing on the following zoning case:
24. Case No. 999-4, Doddridge Associates Ltd.: A change of zoning from a `B-1" Neighborhood
Business District to a "B-4" General Business District on United Savings Center, 1.033 acres
out of Lot A, located on the northwest corner of Doddridge and South Alameda Streets.
City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the
"B-4" General Business District. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Council
Member Cooper made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Council Member
Colmenero, and passed. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 023797
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Doddridge Associates, Ltd., by
changing the zoning map in reference to 1.033 acres out of Lot A, United Savings Center
from "B-1" Neighborhood Business District to "B-4" General Business District; amending
the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive
Plan.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
* * * * * * * * * *
*
**
Mayor Neal referred to Item 25, two zoning cases. City Secretary Chapa said the applicant
had requested that the hearing be continued for one additional week. A motion was made, seconded
and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning cases:
25.a. Case No. 899-9, Chester C. Coker: A change of zoning from an "F -R" Farm -Rural District
to an "I-2" Light Industrial District on Russell Farm Blocks, all of Lot 5 and portions of Lots
4 and 6, located on the east side of Heinsohn Road approximately 1,640 feet north of Bear
Lane.
25.b. Case No. 999-10, Chester C. Coker: A change of zoning from an "F -R" Farm -Rural District
and an "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to a "B-3" Business District on Russell Farm
Blocks, east 8.37 acres out of Lot 6, located on the southwest corner of Bates Drive and
South Padre Island Drive.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 17
Council Member Colmenero made a motion to continue the hearing for one week, seconded
by Council Member Scott, and passed.
POSTPONED
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Chcstcr C. Coker by changing the
zoning m p in rcfcrcncc to L is 5 and 6 and thc west portion of Lot 4, J.C. Russell Farm
Blocks from "F R" Farm Rural Di3triet and "R 1B" Onc Family Dwelling District to "B 3"
amending thc Comprchcnsivc Plan to account for any deviations from thc cxi3ting
Cemprekei.sive Plan.
POSTPONED
Amending thc Zoning Ordinance upon application by Chcstcr C. Coker, by changing the
Zoning Map in reference to thc cast portion of Lot 6, J.C. Russell Farm Blocks from "F R"
Farm Rural District and "R 1B" Onc family Dwelling District to "B 3" Business District;
amending thc Comprchcnsivc Plan to account for any deviation from thc existing
Comprchcnsivc Plan.
Mayor Neal called for a brief recess.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
With regard to Item 25, City Secretary Chapa stated that Council Member Gonzales had filed
a disclosure affadavit and would be abstaining from discussing or voting on zoning cases No. 899-9
and No. 999-10.
Mayor Neal then opened discussion on Item 26, consideration of city utility services re-
engineering option. City Manager Garcia said the presentation was a continuation of an issue which
began several months ago: determining how to proceed with privatization or re-engineering of the
city's water and wastewater departments. During the initial presentation, the Council requested that
staff provide more detailed information. He noted that another discussion will be held next week.
Using a computer presentation, Mr. Garcia proceeded to discuss in detail his recommendation
of pursuing a formal re-engineering effort for the water and wastewater departments for about 12
months. At the conclusion of that time, a plan would be adopted to issue a request for proposals for
contracting operations and maintenance of selected system components.
Mr. Garcia explained that he was recommending re-engineering for several reasons, including
that it is a necessary first step; maximizes savings to rate -payers; preserves flexibility to respond to
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 18
emerging priorities without incurring incremental cost; serves as a spingboard for city-wide
improvements; and it is the most appropriate option in the city's situation. He said re-engineering
has already begun to pay off and even greater dividends can be achieved from a formal effort.
The City Manager noted that with re-engineering, the city can use the same cost -control
techniques as the private firms. The advantage to the city is that those firms have, on average, an
extra 25% burden due to profit demands, income taxes and sales taxes. He said that with re-
engineering, all of the savings will accrue to the rate -payers and there is no cap on savings. In
addition, a utility re-engineering effort becomes a city-wide improvement effort.
Mr. Garcia then discussed the complex interrelationships among several city departments
involving allocations and fees to other funds. The total annual allocations are approximately $17.5
million. With privatization, some costs are eliminated but fixed costs must be reallocated. As a
result, the net annual impact on the General Fund is approximately $3.3 million.
He explained that the driving force behind Corpus Christi's re-engineering effort is the
potential for savings, while typical driving forces behind privatization include run down facilities,
rapidly rising cost of operations and rates, compliance/quality/regulatory problems, difficulties in
finding qualified staff, and lack of a capital improvement program. Mr. Garcia said the city's re-
engineering work has begun to pay off in that total costs have been flat despite stricter permits, more
stringent regulations, and increased capacity, which he explained. He also discussed cost-
containment strategies that are currently in place and several personnel issues that are being
examined.
Mr. Garcia pointed out that the goal of re-engineering is to maximize savings and value for
rate -payers. Specific objectives include: continue to reduce costs through more efficient operations
in the water and wastewater departments and throughout city departments; provide rate -payers with
100% of the benefits achieved; maintain or improve current key service levels; retain flexibility to
respond to city-wide priorities; and ensure that adequate resources are available to maintain systems.
Mr. Garcia said the plan for formally re-engineering the water and wastewater utilities
involves analyzing services, formally examining all processes, and evaluating and implementing
"best practices" for all functions. He said staff is proposing that the city hire a consultant to guide
the re-engineering process and, after one year (in about November 2000), begin developing an RFP
and a draft contract/service agreement for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant and the Whitecap
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Finally, in May 2001, the city would evaluate the responses to the
RFPs and make an award.
He said that in order to proceed with the re-engineering process, staff is recommending hiring
the firm of EMA at a base cost of $270,000. If the city opted to have EMA provide "coaching" to
city staff (intensive one-on-one employee training), it would cost an additional $30,000 per month
for no more than 12 months, for a possible maximum amount of $630,000.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 19
Mr. Ed Garafia, Water Superintendent, and Mr. Foster Crowell, Wastewater Superintendent,
then proceeded to answer several questions from Council members about specific aspects of their
respective departments, including number of personnel, actual costs versus budgeted costs, cost-
cutting efforts, and other issues. Mr. Ron Massey, Assistant City Manager for Public Works and
Utilities, also further discussed specific utilities operations and Ms. Nancy Lerner, of EMA,
addressed questions regarding services that would be provided by her firm and costs associated with
those services. She and Mr. Garcia noted that re-engineering is an involved process from the
personnel standpoint, which they discussed.
Responding to Council members' questions, Mr. Garcia referred to the utility rates, saying
that staff hopes to revise those rates downward; he noted that most of the increases were for the
capital improvement program. Mayor Neal asked about the Stormwater Department, and Mr. Garcia
explained that Stormwater was not included, which he explained. He said he believes the competitive
process is the most effective way to ensure that the rate -payers are receiving the best value. He said
in order to provide an accurate comparison between what it costs the city to operate its utility versus
what it costs the private sector to operate it, the city should go through the re-engineering process.
In reply to another question, City Attorney Bray explained that basically the utility system
purchases services from the General Fund and the other funds. He said the reason the Charter
provision was enacted was to keep the General Fund from charging franchise fees and fees in lieu
of taxes; if an option is characterized in that way, it may not comply with the Charter.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 27, ClearSource franchise. He said the City Attorney
had asked that Item 27.c. be withdrawn and brought back in two weeks. There were no comments
from the audience.
Council Member Kinnison asked if the proposed ClearSource franchise would have any type
of adverse effect on an eventual contract with TCI Cablevision (AT&T). Mr. Adrian Herbst, the
city's consultant regarding the cable franchise renewal, said he did not think so, adding that they
have gone to great lengths to ensure that there is a level playing field. He said that is the reason there
are two documents --a master ordinance and a franchise agreement. Mr. Kinnison noted that the
ClearSource agreement provides for a 5% franchise fee, and he asked if TCI's fee will also be 5%;
Mr. Herbst replied affirmatively.
Responding to another question from Mr. Kinnison, Mr. Herbst said the franchise fee would
apply to anything that comes under the umbrella of "cable service," which is carefully defined. In
addition, the gross revenue definition is very broad --stating that income is income from whatever
source derived. The agreement also has attached a franchise fee payment worksheet that has to be
updated periodically. Mr. Kinnison asked what TCI's current percentage is, and Mr. Herbst replied
that it is 4%, which generates approximately $1 million each year.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 20
Mr. Herbst went on to say that the city has been working on the cable franchise renewal
process for some time through a specially formed committee, which in January has been developing
a master cable ordinance and a model franchise agreement. He said those documents were almost
completed when ClearSource approached the city about having their application considered. Mayor
Neal and Mr. Kinnison said ClearSource's plans constitute a major infrastructure improvement, and
they welcomed ClearSource to the community.
City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
27.a. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Granting to ClearSource, Inc. a non-exclusive franchise to construct, maintain, and operate
for a period of one year, a cable television system and facilities and additions thereto, in,
under, over, along, across, and upon the streets, lanes, avenues, alleys, sidewalks, bridges,
rights-of-way, easements, highways and other places in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero,
Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Cooper
absent.
27.b. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Granting to ClearSource, Inc. a non-exclusive franchise to construct, maintain, and operate
for a period of fifteen years, and during any extensions thereof, a cable television system and
facilities and additions thereto, in, under, over, along, across and upon the streets, lanes,
avenues, alleys, sidewalks, bridges, rights-of-way, easements, highways and other places in
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero,
Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Cooper
absent.
27.c. POSTPONED
Establishing a Master Cable Services Regulatory Ordinaziee-geraei„ing use of city st.eets,
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 28, Municipal Court technology fee.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 21
Ms. Barb Sudhoff, Director of Municipal Court, said the Texas Legislature recently approved
the development of a technology fund for Municipal Courts. She said the Legislature allowed up to
$4 per conviction and staff's recommendation is to charge the $4 on all convictions excluding
parking citations. She said the fee is to finance the purchase of technological enhancements to
improve the efficiency of the Court. Without the technology fee, such expenditures would have to
come from the city's General Fund. She said Corpus Christi's Court is the first in the state to have
done electronic routing of cases. She briefly explained specific technology enhancements the Court
can utilize.
There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for
their votes as follows:
28. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund; providing for the assessment and
collection of a four dollar Municipal Court Technology fee as a cost of court; providing for
severability; providing for publication and effective date of December 1, 1999; and providing
for expiration date of September 1, 2005.
The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Cooper, Garrett,
Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Colmenero absent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 29, Municipal Court security fee.
Ms. Sudhoff explained that the Municipal Court Building Security Fund was approved by
the Council in 1995, and when the Court absorbed the parking function, it had the ability the charge
the $3 security fee on parking citations. However, the Municipal Court Committee concluded that
the security fee should not be charged on parking citations. Consequently, the ordinance needed to
be revised. There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for
their votes as follows:
29. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Amending Section 29-48, Municipal Court Building Security Fund and Security Fee as cost
of court, to exclude parking citations and to provide that such fund may be used to finance
continuing education on security issues for court personnel; providing for publication and
effective date.
The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Colmenero,
Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye."
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 22
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 30, art grant to support restoration of the Pompeo
Coppini sculpture located at Schatzel and Lower Broadway Streets. Mayor Neal called for comments
from the audience, and there were none Council Member Scott noted that the Coppini sculpture was
a favorite of the late George Brown. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes:
30. ORDINANCE NO. 023798
Ordinance appropriating a $14,300 grant from the Save Outdoor Sculpture! Heritage
Preservation organization in the No. 1030 Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund - Arts Projects, to
support restoration of the Pompeo Coppini sculpture located at Schatzel and Lower
Broadway Streets; amending Ordinance No. 023702 which adopted the FY 99-00 budget, by
adding $14,300 to the No. 1030 Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund- Arts Projects.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Gonzales, Kinnison, B. Longoria, J. Longoria, and Scott voting
"Aye."
* * * * * * * * * *
*
**
Mayor Neal called for the City Manager's report. Mr. Garcia distributed copies of the draft
disparity study and said the Council was scheduled to discuss it next week. He noted that the signs
for the Cesar Chavez Memorial Parkway are ready and will be installed on October 15th. Also, a
joint meeting between the City Council and the Nueces County Commissioners Court is scheduled
for October 13th.
Fire ChiefJ.J. Adame updated the Council on negotiations with the Firefighters Association.
He explained that this session was limited in scope to three issues: EMS certification and re-
certification, call-backs for overtime, and the assessment center for promotion to the rank of captain
(which was taken off the table by mutual agreement). Chief Adame then described the background
and results that were reached on the first two items. Mr. Garcia said the association is ready to go
to its membership with the proposed agreement.
Mr. Utter then described plans for infrastructure improvements in the Rodd Field Village
area, in which Council Member Kinnison has been involved. Mr. Escobar gave the quarterly status
report on the 1986 street bond program and FY 1999-2000 TIP projects. Mr. Escobar also stated that
the MPO Policy Committee approved the city's request for a TIP amendment, which resulted in the
city receiving almost $8 million for the Leopard Street project (Phases 1, 2 and 3). He noted that the
Council had previously authorized staff to borrow $4.3 million from the State Infrastructure Bank
for Leopard Street, Phase 3, but this recent action means the city will probably only have to borrow
about $1 million. Mayor Neal thanked city staff and the members of the MPO for their support.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 23
Mayor Neal asked about an update on parks, and Mr. Garcia said the report will be ready
October 13th. The Mayor then called for Council concerns and reports.
Mrs. Longoria said there needs to be a discussion about developing Garcia Park.
Dr. Gonzales said that next week he will be bringing two donations for the animal control
department and the Humane Society. He also said there are several areas where brush has not been
picked up for some time, particularly in the Kostoryz-Horne-Brawner Parkway -Ayers areas. Mr.
Garcia said the brush from the hurricane has been picked up and the crews are on a six-week cycle.
A discussion ensued.
Mr. Longoria said a vendor expressed concern about receiving timely payment from the city.
Mr. Garcia replied that when the systems were converted from one type of computers to another, it
did take some time to get back on schedule. He said he believes the city is fairly current with its
payables and they are working to get them on 30 -day schedules. Mr. Longoria asked if the disparity
study discussion could be delayed due to scheduled functions next week. There was a consensus to
postpone it to the November 9th Council meeting.
In response to a question from Mr. Kinnison, Mr. Massey said street crews have been
leveling Everhart Road and they will be putting a seal coat on it from SPID past Snowgoose Drive.
Mr. Kirmison asked when the audited financial statements will be delivered. Mr. Jorge Garza,
Assistant City Manager for Administrative Services, replied that it will be at the end of November
or early December. Mr. Kinnison also expressed concem about excessive brush in Wooldridge Creek
Subdivision, and he asked about the status of a new golf course. Mr. Garcia said they are looking
into a public/private joint venture and staff will give a presentation next week.
Mr. Colmenero commented on brush problems in the Ayers-Kostoryz-Home-Gollihar areas,
and he requested an update on the sports complex and the CDBG funds.
Mr. Garrett said a citizen complained that his water was mistakenly cut off and he was told
by a city staff member that that is a frequent occurrence. Mr. Garza said it happens occasionally but
not frequently. Responding to another question from Mr. Garrett, Mr. Garcia said the city does not
charge for brush being dumped at the landfill by residents who bring their utility bill.
Mr. Scott asked when the Council will discuss its goals, and Mayor Neal replied next week.
Mr. Scott also discussed the issue of FHA insurance on new homes. Mr. Garcia explained that there
is a national policy that discourages the construction of new residential homes on barrier islands. Mr.
Scott also asked about the city's lobbyists in Austin. Mr. Utter said the city's lobbyists will be
tracking several issues in the Senate committees, including annexation. Mayor Neal pointed out that
the Texas Municipal League will develop interim legislative areas of concem that they will forward
to member cities, at which time the City Council can develop its own interim policies for its
lobbyists.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 12, 1999
Page 24
Mrs. Longoria commented on letters the Council had received regarding funding for Arts and
Cultural Commission subgrants. Mayor Neal said they had responded to Mr. Bonilla's letter in
writing. Mr. Garcia explained that the arts funding process is very involved and often divisive, which
he explained. He said that for a variety of reasons, several members of the arts community now feel
that if they did not receive their full funding from the Arts and Cultural Commission, they have the
opportunity to receive it by appealing directly to the Council members. The ACC recommendations
are scheduled to come before the Council on October 26th.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Neal declared the Council
meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. on October 12, 1999.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *