HomeMy WebLinkAbout17860 ORD - 09/28/19834
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON THE
FOLLOWING STREETS:
Leopard -Baldwin Area
1. Quaile Drive, from Villa Drive to Breckenridge Drive,
2. Garfield Drive, from Leopard Street to Westchester
Drive,
3. Reeves Drive, from Garfield Drive to Westchester
Drive,
4. Van Cura Drive, from the South Frontage Road of I.H.
37 to Eloise Drive,
5. Eloise Drive, from Van Cura Drive to Omaha Drive, and
6. Lantana Street Sidewalks, on the East Side, from
North of I.H. 37 to Saint Theresa School.
FIXING A LIEN AND CHARGE, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT
AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted
ordinance passed and approved on the 3rd day of August, 1983, determined the
necessity for, and ordered the improvement of the following streets:
Leopard -Baldwin Area
1. Quaile Drive, from Villa Drive to Breckenridge Drive,
2. Garfield Drive, from Leopard Street to Westchester
Drive,
3. Reeves Drive, from Garfield Drive to Westchester
Drive,
4. Van Cura Drive, from the South Frontage Road of I.H.
37 to Eloise Drive,
5. Eloise Drive, from Van Cura Drive to Omaha Drive, and
6. Lantana Street Sidewalks, on the East Side, from
North of I.H. 37 to Saint Theresa School.
in the manner and according to the plans and specifications heretofore
approved and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated August 3, 1983, a
duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of the
said City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the City Engineer to
prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of
the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the property
abutting upon a portion of the aforesaid streets within the limits herein
defined, to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City
Engineer has heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of other matters
relating thereto with said City Council, and same has been received, examined
and approved by said City Council; and
WHEREAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated
August 3, 1983, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that
17860
SEP 2 81984
MICROFILMED
portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on the above named
streets, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting
property and the real and true owners thereof, and by ordinance dated
August 3, 1983, did order and set a hearing to be held at 3 p.m. on the 31st
day of August, 1983, in the City Council Chambers in the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property abutting upon
said streets, within the limits above defined, and for all others owning or
claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property, or any of
said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against each
parcel of abutting property and the real and true• owner or owners thereof,
and as to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue
of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error, invalidity,
irregularity or deficiency in any proceedings, or contract, to appear and be
heard in person or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said
matters; and the City Council did by said ordinance order and direct the City
to give notice of said hearing to the owners abutting upon said streets as
shown by the current ad valorem tax roll by mailing such notice to such
owners and publishing said notice at least three times in the Corpus Christi
Times before the date of the hearing, such notice of mail and by publication
being in compliance with the provisions of Article 1105b of Vernon's
Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, such notice was given said owners of property as shown on
the current ad valorem tax roll within the limits of the streets being
improved by mailing such notice at ,least fourteen (14) days prior to the
hearing to such owners and by publishing three times notice of such hearing
in the Corpus Christi Times, the first of which publication was at least
twenty-one (21) days prior to the date of said hearing; both forms of notice
being in compliance with and containing the information required by Article
1105b, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes; and
WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as
provided by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing
of which notice was given, was opened and held on August 31, 1983, in the
City Council Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance
with said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all
said abovementioned persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents
f ,Minutes
d Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 3
Mayor Jones referred to item 3 pertaining to the purchase of a number of
trees for the Park Division and suggested that a ceremony be arranged for the
neighborhood park tree planting program.
Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak on
these items.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the foregoing motions 1
thru 7 be approved; seconded by Council Member Hawkins; and passed
unanimously.
*************************
Mayor Jones called for consideration of consent ordinances and ordinances
from previous meetings on items 8 and 9.
Mayor Jones referred to ordinance 8 which is the first reading authorizing
an annexation contract and asked Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning,
about the public hearing conducted in the area to be annexed.
Mr. Wenger explained that no one attended the meeting which was
conducted in the area to be annexed and informed the Council that effective
August 29, 1983, it will no longer be necessary to conduct public hearings in
the area to be annexed unless at least 20 people oppose the annexation.
Council Member Berlanga referred to the name of the subdivision
"Inverness" and inquired about its meaning in this instance.
Assistant City Manager Tom Utter explained that it is just a name of a
subdivision, and City Manager Martin stated that the developer decides on the
name.
There were no comments from members of the audience on ordinances 8 and
9; City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes; and the following
ordinances were passed:
FIRST READING:
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND TRISTAR
DEVELOPMENT, INC. FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 46.68
ACRES OF LAND OUT OF LOTS 20, 21, 22, 28 AND 29, SECTION 5, FLOUR
BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, NUECES COUNTY,
TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID LAND TO LIE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY.
The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Guerrero, Hawkins,
Kennedy, McComb, Mendez and Slavik voting "aye".
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 4
SECOND READING:
ADOPTING THE STANDARD MECHANICAL CODE, 1982 EDITION, WITH
CERTAIN CHANGES THEREIN AND ADDITIONS THERETO, AS THE
MECHANICAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 1983.
The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed to its third
reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Guerrero, Hawkins,
Kennedy, McComb, Mendez and Slavik voting "aye".
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones announced the public hearing on the following item:
10. Assessment Hearing - 3:00 p.m. - Assessment for improvements to Quaile
Drive from Villa Drive to Breckenridge Drive, Garfield Drive from Leopard
Street to Westchester Drive, Reeves Drive from Garfield to Westchester,
Van Cura Drive Drive from the South Frontage Road of I.H. 37 to Eloise
Drive, Eloise Drive from Van Cura to Omaha Drive, and the east side of
Lantana Street from north of I.H. 37 to Saint Theresa School. The roll
provides for assessments of $152,377.68 on 117 items.
City Manager Martin informed the Council that this is a voluntary paving
assessment hearing; stated that in the Council notebooks had been included a
description of this case and a discussion of the required process,' noting that
there is a technical and legal process required for the assessment hearings and
that the City Attorney will conduct the formal portion of the hearing. He
further stated that the public hearing is conducted for the purpose of making
an official record before the governing body.
City Attorney J. Bruce Aycock explained to the Council that the public
hearing is required by State Law, Article 1105.b, and the purpose is to give
the Council an opportunity to hear about the scope of the project by the
Engineer. He stated that testimony will then be given by a real estate
appraiser about the enhancement of the street improvements. Mr. Aycock called
as his first witness Mr. Gerald Smith, P.E., City Engineer. Through
questioning of the witness the City Attorney established Mr. Smith's
qualifications to testify during this public hearing, noting that a copy of his
qualifications are on file with the City. He then asked Mr. Smith to explain the
project.
Mr. Smith testified that this project is known as the Leopard/Baldwin Area
Street Improvements and located the following streets on a transparency
displayed on the screen: 1) Quaile Drive from Villa Drive to Breckenridge
Drive, 2) Garfield Drive from Leopard Street to Westchester Drive, 3) Reeves
Drive from Garfield to Westchester, 4) Van Cura Drive Drive from the South
Frontage Road of I.H. 37 to Eloise Drive, 5) Eloise Drive from Van Cura to
Omaha Drive, and 6) Lantana Street sidewalks on the east side from north of
I.H. 37 to Saint Theresa School.
i.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 5
Mr. Smith informed the Council that the City's Engineering Department had
prepared the plans and specifications for these streets and that they will be
constructed 28' wide, which is the usual width of residential streets; a standard
curb and gutter section will be constructed, 6" compacted subgrade, 8" flexible
caliche base and 1-" hotmix asphaltic pavement. He further explained that 4'
or 5' wide reinforced sidewalks 4" thick will be constructed as well as 6" thick
reinforced concrete driveways as shown on the plans or where requested by the
property owners. He also noted that a 6" diameter replacement waterline will
be constructed along Van Cura Drive and a 4' wide reinforced sidewalk will be
constructed on the east side of Lantana Street. Mr. Smith also stated that
storm sewers will be constructed on most of the streets.
Mr. Smith testified that bids on this project were received by the City
Council on July 13, 1983 and the low bid was that submitted by King
Construction Company for a total contract price of $438,236.79. He stated that
the preliminary assessments total $152,377.68, and the City's portion of the
project is $285,859.11. He explained that the amount of each assessment has
been sent to the property owners included in the project, together with a
notification of this public hearing.
Mr. Smith further stated that the assessments are not due until after
completion of the project, at which time a notice will be sent to each property
owner. He explained that the assessments may be paid in cash at that time or
payments may be extended over a 5 year period, during which time monthly
payments may be made at an interest rate of 8%, or in the case of hardship,
those payments may be extended over a 10 year period. He further stated that
this project was initiated by the property owners participating in the voluntary
paving program and over 50% of the property owners signed a petition
requesting the street improvements.
Mr. Smith further explained that the contract will normally be awarded one
week after the assessment hearing and the contractor has 100 working days to
complete the project or approximately 5 months.
Mayor Jones commented that the property owners will pay 34% of the cost
and inquired about the source of the other funds, and Mr. Smith stated that
they would be from the 1982 bond program.
Council Member Mendez inquired about the rate for the payment of the
sidewalk improvements on Lantana Street, and Mr. Smith explained that the
ordinance setting the assessment rates stipulates that churches and schools will
pay the residential rate and that is the maximum allowed for sidewalk
assessments.
Council Member McComb inquired if the bonds had been issued for this
project, and Mr. Smith replied that two bond sales have been conducted and
the funds are available at this time.
Council Member Berlenge inquired about the length of time that the
contractor is liable for the work, and Mr. Smith explained that under their
performance bond, they are required to warranty the work for one year after
the project is completed.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 6
Council Member Berlanga noted that a number of streets have raised places
or bumps in them and inquired if there is any way they can be installed to
keep the pavement level. Mr. Smith assured Mr. Berlanga that those can be
corrected.
Mayor Jones suggested that Council Member Berlanga provide the staff
with specific locations in which these problems exist.
City Attorney Aycock then called on the appraiser to testify. He
questioned the appraiser, Mr. William J. Holly, as to his qualifications and
verified that he does have on file with the City a copy of his qualifications.
Mr. Holly then testified that he has examined each and every one of the
121 parcels listed on the assessment roll and in his opinion all of the properties
will be enhanced in value at least in the amount of the assessments and that he
had found no odd or irregular shaped lots on which he would recommend a
reduction.
City Attorney Aycock stated that the formal presentation had been
completed.
Mr. Smith explained that petitions from the property owners had been
received on all streets with the exception of Eloise Street, but the staff
recommended that it be included as a part of this project. He stated that the
petitions had been received prior to November of 1981 in order to be included
in the 1982 bond program.
Council Member Kennedy commented that 34$ of the cost seemed a little
higher than usual, and Mr. Smith reminded him that the rates were increased in
1981.
Mayor Jones called for comments from members of the audience on the
assessments.
Mr. Edgar Goode, 865 Van Cura, (item 100), referred to the petition that
had originally been signed requesting the street improvements and stated that
the petition he signed stated that the cost to the property owner would be $500
and would include paving his driveway all the way to the garage. He stated
that he also represents Mrs. Kenneth B. Clawson, 901 Van Cura, (item 99),
and Mrs. Lucille K. Gotcher, 862 Van Cura, (item 80). Mr. Goode pointed out
that a number of property owners on the street have died since the petition
was signed. He stated his assessment was $1,027.39. He pointed out that most
of the residents are elderly and they have lived there for many years without
sidewalks and he objects to having the street improved at this time.
Mayor Jones pointed out that more than one-half of the people on this
street signed the petition requesting the street improvements.
Mr. Smith obtained the petition referred to for Van Cura and pointed out
to the Council that there is not a figure anywhere on the petition and the
assessments will be levied according to the assessment ordinance.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 7
Council Member Hawkins referred to a similar situation that had occurred
during a public hearing a few weeks ago and stated that he understood that the
policy was being reviewed with the possibility that residents could change their
minds about the petition that had been signed if they desired. He reminded
the staff that he had suggested that the policy be reviewed.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner concurred since this petition is three years old and
expressed the opinion that it would be appropriate to have someone go back to
the neighborhood to see if the property owners still want the street improved.
Mr. Smith pointed out that all of the City's petitions are 3 or 4 years old
because it takes approximately that length of time to have them on a bond
issue.
Council Member Slavik inquired about the date that the petition was
signed, and Mr. Smith stated that it was signed in 1980. Mrs. Slavik also
inquired about the percentage of increase since 1980. Mr. Smith explained that
he did not think there was an increase in residential rates since 1980; the
ordinance was passed to increase the commercial rates in 1981; but he
understood that the percentage had been increased. Mrs. Slavik then
expressed the opinion that the residents should be contacted to see if they still
desire to have their street improved.
Council Member Guerrero inquired about the time and expense in
evaluating the petitions, and Mr. Smith expressed the opinion that the staff
could accomplish this in about three weeks. He pointed out that it is rather
unusual for this situation to occur at this stage since considerable expense has
already been incurred through preparing the plans and specifications and
receiving the bids. He estimated that $8,000 to $10,000 has already been spent
on this project.
Mayor Jones pointed out that the property owners themselves are only
paying 1/3 of the cost of the street improvements and explained that the time
factor involved is that a bond election is only conducted about every four years
and delayed time is inevitable. He noted that this program has been very
successful in improving the streets west of Kostoryz Road, and if the City
retreats from this program, they will delay improvements on the west side of
the City.
Council Member McComb referred to the petition for the improvements on
Van Cura Street and noted that the petition states that the payments can be
made over a five year period at an interest rate of 64%.
Mr. Smith explained that the current ordinance now specifies the
percentage as 8%, and Mr. McComb indicated that possibly that would nullify
this petition since the percentage of the loan for the assessments is greater at
this time. Mr. Smith explained that the ordinance was amended in September of
1981 to increase the interest rate on assessments and at that time a grandfather
clause was included but this project does not fall in that category.
City Manager Martin pointed out that that document is a petition, not a
contract since it is just a request to the Council. He further explained that
Minutes •
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 8
the grandfather clause was included in the ordinance at the time the rates were
changed and the interest was changed to exclude projects included in the 1977
bond program. He pointed out to the Council that there are a number of
petitions that are two or three years old and if the Council desires there will
be a need to reaffirm that the property owners still want the improvements or
the Council will have to approve another grandfather clause to set the lower
interest rate according to the date the petitions were signed.
Mayor Jones inquired if the Council did this would it not be true that
those on the bottom of the list would probably not have their streets improved
since more funds would be expended on other projects, and City Manager
Martin stated that that was absolutely correct. Mayor Jones then pointed out
that the Council can do anything they desire but other street projects will not
be completed if there is a need to change the payments of assessments.
Council Member Hawkins stated that the City should go back to those who
signed petitions at the lower interest rate to see if they still wanted the
improvements. He stated that this would only be fair.
A motion was made by Council Member Hawkins to direct the staff to
contact the residents of Van Cura Street if they desire to have their street
improved at this time and notify the signers of other petitions to see if they
want their streets improved at the higher interest rate before any engineering
work is accomplished.
Council Member Mendez stated that he felt that all the petitoins should be
reviewed before the City incurs too much expense for engineering, etc.
City Manager Martin pointed out to the Council that this project is for
several streets in the area and rather than conducting a survey on this one
street, he felt that all of the property owners on all of the streets should be
contacted. He agreed that prior to starting engineering work on future street
improvement projects, that the staff approach the originators of the voluntary
paving petitions to see if the people who submitted the petition would be willing
to go out to reaffirm that the residents still want improvements. He stated that
this would save the City a great deal of money.
Council Member Hawkins agreed to amend his motion to effect all of those
actions. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed
unanimously.
Also speaking in regard to the assessments was Mr. Marvin H. Wheeler and
Southern Oil Sales Company who stated that they have property at the
intersection of Leopard and Garfield and he does not agree to the sidewalks and
curbs that are to be constructed at that business address.
Mr. Smith identified Mr. Wheeler's property as item 15 and informed the
Council that the assessment on that property was $7,087.68.
Mr. Wheeler continued by stating that he objected to the sidewalks, he did
not agree to the improvements and he did not sign the voluntary paving
petition.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
• August 31, 1983
Page 9
Mr. Otto Hampton, 401 Dixon Street, stated that he had not agreed to the
voluntary paving because his wife had signed the petition. He stated that he
was opposed to the sidewalk construction because he does not have one on
Dixon Street which is the street on which his property fronts and he objects to
having to pay for a sidewalk at the side of his property.
Mr. Smith explained that the sidewalk on the Quaile Drive portion of Mr.
Hampton's property was $245 and the sidewalk on Dixon Street was $80. Mr.
Smith continued by stating that the staff thought that the petition was very
clear in that it included a sidewalk.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner inquired as to when the petition is returned for the
second consent of the improvements, if they could make a choice as to whether
or not they wanted sidewalks.
Mr. Smith explained that the City is attempting to upgrade the property to
the standards in other portions of the City and they feel that the sidewalks
belong adjacent to streets.
Council Member Mendez inquired if property owners do not want sidewalks
if they would still be qualified to participate in the voluntary paving program,
and Mr. Smith replied that this would be a decision for the Council to make.
He reiterated that the staff is of the opinion that sidewalks are necessary to
upgrade a neighborhood.
Mr. Mendez stated that in his opinion, since this is in an older area,
possibly there is no need for the sidewalks.
Mayor Jones pointed out that if a subdivision was being developed on the
south side, the developer would be required to construct sidewalks and he was
of the opinion that sidewalks on the west side are needed to upgrade the entire
neighborhood. He stated that since there are certain standards for new
development and it includes curb, gutters and sidewalks, he felt that the same
standards should be applied all over the City.
Mr. George Deer, 3901 Quaile Drive, also objected to the installation of
sidewalks, stating that he was of the opinion that they create problems with
children riding bikes, etc., on the sidewalk.
Mayor Jones inquired if bicycles are allowed to be ridden on sidewalks and
City Attorney Aycock stated that there is no prohibition for riding bicycles on
sidewalks.
No one else spoke in regard to the assessments.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the public hearing on
the assessments be recessed until the staff has an opportunity to consider this
further with those who signed voluntary paving petitions; seconded by Council
Member Berlanga; and passed unanimously.
After further discussion pertaining to the sidewalks, City Manager Martin
stated that he felt that this issue is independent of this case as far as the
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 10
sidewalks are concerned. He suggested that the Council needs to address this
as a policy question - Will we do sidewalks only - or Will we do curb and
gutters only. He pointed out that this is not the time to set that policy, but
this should be done for future voluntary paving programs. He pointed out that
as of this date, the voluntary paving petitions address all improvements,
including sidewalks.
Mayor Jones stated that he would never accept a standard on the west side
that is less than that of the south side.
Council Member McComb agreed that the Council needed to be aware of the
criticism in the past that there is no consistency in what is being done
throughout the City. He stated that he understood that criticism and he
believed that the Council should be consistent in improvements, indicating his
concurrence with Mayor Jones. He pointed out that in the future, someone
might protest that the City was being unfair to those on the west side.
Council Member Hawkins stated that he did not like to use the terminology
westside/southside issue. He pointed out that if the policy is changed by the
Council, it would not affect just the west side but would affect the entire City.
Council Member Kennedy pointed out that although these particular homes
are owned by elderly people, there may be a time when the homes are sold and
younger families move into the area and they would definitely need sidewalks
for their children. He too agreed that uniform standards should be established
and maintained.
Council Member Berlanga agreed, stating that if the City adopts various
options, there would be problems and he would like to see sidewalks
constructed along with curbs and gutters.
Council Member Slavik stated that she is concerned about senior citizens
and their ability to pay assessments. She suggested that the discussion on this
subject include the possibilities of helping elderly citizens pay their
assessments.
Council Member Hawkins noted that the Council should remember that
they're discussing voluntary assessments and he agreed that they should have
the same standards, but if property owners cannot pay their assessments, they
will be hesitant to sign a voluntary paving petition.
Mayor Jones explained the policy approved by the Council a few months
ago for Community Development Block Grant payments by which assessment
payments were deferred until the property was sold.
Mr. Smith pointed out that this policy was established a few months ago on
which projects for which federal money is used through the CDBG funding.
Council Member Hawkins pointed out that that policy does not apply to a
voluntary paving program, but only to projects funded by CDBG.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
• August 31, 1983
Page 11
Council Member Kennedy reminded the Council that if hardship can be
proven, the time for payment of assessments can be extended from five years to
ten years. He also pointed out that in the history of the voluntary paving
program, there have been no foreclosures on property because of an
outstanding debt on assessments.
Mr. Mendez noted that this does not really address the question of the
ability of senior citizens to pay assessments associated with voluntary paving
petitions.
City Manager Martin informed the Council that the staff cannot force
property owners to circulate the petitions again in a three week time period;
therefore, this particular street improvement project could require more time
than that.
Mayor Jones requested a report on the number of projects that have been
completed to improve the City through the volunteer paving program.
*******************
Mayor Jones announced public hearings on three zoning applications.
City Manager Martin made a general statement to the Council in regard to
zoning cases and referred to the procedure followed to change the zoning. He
explained to the Council that there will be approximately three cases a week to
be considered by the City Council.
11. Application No. 783-11 - Mr. C. T. Bach: for a change of zoning from
''R -1B" One-a�miT D -welling District and "I-2" Light Industrial District to
"T -1B" Mobile Home Park District on the north f of Lot 7, Section 8,
Bohemian Colony Lands, located on the east side of Ayers Street,
approximately 1,250' south of Holly Road.
Assistant City Manager Tom Utter informed the Council that in response to
the five notices of the public hearing mailed to property owners within 200' of
the area to be considered, one in favor and none in opposition had been
returned. He stated that both the Planning Commission and Planning staff
recommend approval of this application.
Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning, located the area on the zoning
and land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area and showed
slides of the vicinity. He stated that the plans, if the zoning is approved, are
for a mobile home park.
Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak in
regard to this application.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Hawkins, and passed unanimously.
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their vote on the ordinance
effecting the change of zoning and the following was passed:
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 12
ORDINANCE 17810:
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF C. T. BACH BY
CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO A PORTION OF LOT 7,
SECTION 8, BOHEMIAN COLONY LANDS FROM "R -1B" ONE -FAMILY DWELLING
DISTRICT AND "1-2" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO "T -1B" MOBILE HOME
PARK DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Guerrero, Hawkins, Kennedy,
McComb, Mendez and Slavik voting "aye".
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Inc.: for a change of
Heavy Industrial District
.5± miles north of State
12. Application No. 783-12 - Superior Helicopters,
zoning from "F -R" Farm -Rural District to "1-3"
on Lots 1 and 2, McKinzie Acres, located 1
Highway 44 on the east side of McKinzie Road.
Mr. Utter informed the Council that six notices
been mailed and one in favor and one in opposition
stated also that both the Planning Commission and
approval.
Mr. Wenger located the area on the zoning and land use map, described
the land use in the surrounding area and showed slides of the vicinity. Mr.
Wenger further explained that this property was prezoned "1-3" as a staff
recommendation a few years ago in accordance with the Industrial District that
was being formed in that area. He stated that at that time, one property
owner employed a consultant to recommend zoning for future development for
the entire area, but this particular piece of property is outside of that area
because the City Council did not zone any of the property west of McKinzie
Road to "1-3", and this particular request is in conformance with the zoning.
Mayor Jones inquired if this has been coordinated with the Airport staff,
and Mr. Wenger stated that it has.
Mayor Jones determined that no one in the audience wished to speak in
regard to this case.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Guerrero and passed unanimously.
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes on the ordinance
changing the zoning and the following was passed:
ORDINANCE 17811:
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF SUPERIOR
HELICOPTERS, INC. BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO
LOTS 1 AND 2, McKINZIE ACRES, FROM "F -R" FARM RURAL DISTRICT TO
."I-3" HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
of the public hearing had
had been returned. He
Planning staff recommend
and attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in
accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following
appeared and offered the following testimony:
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously
carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and
WHEREAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony
being offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of
said abutting property as compared to cost of the improvements of said
portion of said streets proposed to be assessed against said property, or as
to any errors, invalidities or irregularities, in the proceeding or contract
heretofore had in reference to the portions of said streets to be improved;
and
WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special
benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real
and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said
improvements on said streets within the limits above defined, and has heard
all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all protests and
objections relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidities or
irregularities in any of the proceedings and contract for said improvements,
and has given a full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to
make any such protest, objection or offer testimony and has fully examined
and considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests offered and
based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said City Council finds
that each and every parcel of property abutting upon the portion of the
streets aforesaid within the limits to be improved as herein defined, will be
enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construction of said
improvements upon the said streets upon which said improvements proposed to
be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said parcel of
abutting property, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City
Council did consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiences
called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were
proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City and the laws of the
State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had, and the
proceedings of said City Council heretofore had with reference to such
improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City
Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments hereinbelow
made and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property on the
portions of the streets hereinabove described, within the limits defined, and
the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable and did
adopt the rule of apportionment set out below and the division of the cost of
said improvements between said abutting properties, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable, and as producing substantial
equality considering the benefits to be received and the burdens imposed
thereby, and that all objections and protests should be overruled and denied
except the corrections and changes as appear on the final assessment roll
included in this ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for or
against said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners
of abutting property on said streets, within the limits above defined, and to
all persons, firms, corporations and estates, owning or claiming same or any
interest therein, be and the same is hereby closed and all protests and
objections, whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are
hereby overruled and denied.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon
the evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel or property abutting
upon the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined, that the special
benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and
true owner or owners thereof, by virtue to the construction of said
improvements to said portion of said streets upon which said property abuts,
will be in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements as proposed
to be, and as herein assessed against said abutting property and the real and
true owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of the cost of said
improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow made are just and
equitable and produce substantial equality considering the benefits received
and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance with the laws of the
State of Texas, and the Charter provisions of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore had with reference to
said improvements are in all respects regular, proper and valid, and that all
prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens against said abutting
properties, as hereinabove described and the personal liability of the real
Ires
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 3
Mayor Jones referred to item 3 pertaining to the purchase of a number of
trees for the Park Division and suggested that a ceremony be arranged for the
neighborhood park tree planting program.
Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak on
these items.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the foregoing motions 1
thru 7 be approved; seconded by Council Member Hawkins; and passed
unanimously.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones called for consideration of consent ordinances and ordinances
from previous meetings on items 8 and 9.
Mayor Jones referred to ordinance 8 which is the first reading authorizing
an annexation contract and asked Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning,
about the public hearing conducted in the area to be annexed.
Mr. Wenger explained that no one attended the meeting which was
conducted in the area to be annexed and informed the Council that effective
August 29, 1983, it will no longer be necessary to conduct public hearings in
the area to be annexed unless at least 20 people oppose the annexation.
Council Member Berlanga referred to the name of the subdivision
"Inverness" and inquired about its meaning in this instance.
Assistant City Manager Torn Utter explained that it is just a name of a
subdivision, and City Manager Martin stated that the developer decides on the
name.
There were no comments from members of the audience on ordinances 8 and
9; City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes; and the following
ordinances were passed:
FIRST READING:
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND TRISTAR
DEVELOPMENT, INC. FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 46.68
ACRES OF LAND OUT OF LOTS 20, 21, 22, 28 AND 29, SECTION 5, FLOUR
BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, NUECES COUNTY,
TEXAS; FINDING ALL OF SAID LAND TO LIE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, ADJOINING, CONTIGUOUS, AND ADJACENT THERETO; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY.
The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Guerrero, Hawkins,
Kennedy, McComb, Mendez and Slavik voting "aye".
Minutes
Regular Council' Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 5
Mr. Smith informed the Council that the City's Engineering Department had
prepared the plans and specifications for these streets and that they will be
constructed 28' wide, which is the usual width of residential streets; a standard
curb and gutter section will be constructed, 6" compacted subgrade, 8" flexible
caliche base and 11" hotmix asphaltic pavement. He further explained that 4'
or 5' wide reinforced sidewalks 4" thick will be constructed as well as 6" thick
reinforced concrete driveways as shown on the plans or where requested by the
property owners. He also noted that a 6" diameter replacement waterline will
be constructed along Van Cura Drive and a 4' wide reinforced sidewalk will be
constructed on the east side of Lantana Street. Mr. Smith also stated that
storm sewers will be constructed on most of the streets.
Mr. Smith testified that bids on this project were received by the City
Council on July 13, 1983 and the low bid was that submitted by King
Construction Company for a total contract price of $438,236.79. He stated that
the preliminary assessments total $152,377.68, and the City's portion of the
project is $285,859.11. He explained that the amount of each assessment has
been sent to the property owners included in the project, together with a
notification of this public hearing.
Mr. Smith further stated that the assessments are not due until after
completion of the project, at which time a notice will be sent to each property
owner. He explained that the assessments may be paid in cash at that time or
payments may be extended over a 5 year period, during which time monthly
payments may be made at an interest rate of 8%, or in the case of hardship,
those payments may be extended over a 10 year period. He further stated that
this project was initiated by the property owners participating in the voluntary
paving program and over 50% of the property owners signed a petition
requesting the street improvements.
Mr. Smith further explained that the contract will normally be awarded one
week after the assessment hearing and the contractor has 100 working days to
complete the project or approximately 5 months.
Mayor Jones commented that the property owners will pay 34% of the cost
and inquired about the source of the other funds, and Mr. Smith stated that
they would be from the 1982 bond program.
Council Member Mendez inquired about the rate for the payment of the
sidewalk improvements on Lantana Street, and Mr. Smith explained that the
ordinance setting the assessment rates stipulates that churches and schools will
pay the residential rate and that is the maximum allowed for sidewalk
assessments.
Council Member McComb inquired if the bonds had been issued for this
project, and Mr. Smith replied that two bond sales have been conducted and
the funds are available at this time.
Council Member Berlanga inquired about the length of time that the
contractor is liable for the work, and Mr. Smith explained that under their
performance bond, they are required to warranty the work for one year after
the project is completed.
tes
Regular ;Council Meeting .
August 31, 1983
Page 6
Council Member Berlanga noted that a number of streets have raised places
or bumps in them and inquired if there is any way they can be installed to
keep the pavement level. Mr. Smith assured Mr. Berianga that those can be
corrected.
Mayor Jones suggested that Council Member Berlanga provide the staff
with specific locations in which these problems exist.
City Attorney Aycock then called on the appraiser to testify. He
questioned the appraiser, Mr. William J. Holly, as to his qualifications and
verified that he does have on file with the City a copy of his qualifications.
Mr. Holly then testified that he has examined each and every one of the
121 parcels listed on the assessment roll and in his opinion all of the properties
will be enhanced in value at least in the amount of the assessments and that he
had found no odd or irregular shaped Tots on which he would recommend a
reduction.
City Attorney Aycock stated that the formal presentation had been
completed.
Mr. Smith explained that petitions from the property owners had been
received on all streets with the exception of Eloise Street, but the staff
recommended that it be included as a part of this project. He stated that the
petitions had been received prior to November of 1981 in order to be included
in the.1982 bond program.
Council Member Kennedy commented that 34% of the cost seemed a little
higher than usual, and Mr. Smith reminded him that the rates were increased in
1981.
Mayor Jones called for comments from members of the audience on the
assessments.
Mr. Edgar Goode, 865 Van Cura, (item 100), referred to the petition that
had originally been sinned requesting the street improvements and stated that
the petition he signed stated that the cost to the property owner would be $500
and would include paving his driveway all the way to the garage. He stated
that he also represents Mrs. Kenneth B. Clawson, 901 Van Cura, (item 99),
and Mrs. Lucille K. Gotcher, 862 Van Cura, (item 80). Mr. Goode pointed out
that a number of property owners on the street have died since the petition
was signed. He stated his assessment was $1,027.39. He pointed out that most
of the residents are elderly and they have lived there for many years without
sidewalks and he objects to having the street improved at this time.
Mayor Jones pointed out that more than one-half of the people on this
street signed the petition requesting the street improvements.
Mr. Smith obtained the petition referred to for Van Cura and pointed out
to the Council that there is not a figure anywhere on the petition and the
assessments will be levied according to the assessment ordinance.
1
Minutes
' Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 7
Council Member Hawkins referred to a similar situation that had occurred
during a public hearing a few weeks ago and stated that he understood that the
policy was being reviewed with the possibility that residents could change their
minds about the petition that had been signed if they desired. He reminded
the staff that he had suggested that the policy be reviewed.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner concurred since this petition is three years old and
expressed the opinion that it would be appropriate to have someone go back to
the neighborhood 'to see if the property owners still want the street improved.
Mr. Smith pointed out that all of the City's petitions are 3 or 4 years old
because it takes approximately that length of time to have them on a bond
issue.
Council Member Slavik inquired about the date that the petition was
signed, and Mr. Smith stated that it was signed in 1980. Mrs. Slavik also
inquired about the percentage of increase since 1980. Mr. Smith explained that
he did not think there was an increase in residential rates since 1980; the
ordinance was passed to increase the commercial rates in 1981; but he
understood that the percentage had been increased. Mrs. Slavik then
expressed the opinion that the residents should be contacted to see If they still
desire to have their street improved.
Council Member Guerrero inquired about the time and expense in
evaluating the petitions, and Mr. Smith expressed the opinion that the staff
could accomplish this in about three weeks. He pointed out that it is rather
unusual for this situation to occur at this stage since considerable expense has
already been Incurred through preparing the plans and specifications and
receiving the bids. He estimated that $8,000 to $10,000 has already been spent
on this project.
Mayor Jones pointed out that the property owners themselves are only
paying 1/3 of the cost of the street improvements and explained that the time
factor involved is that a bond election Is only conducted about every four years
and delayed time is inevitable. He noted that this program has been very
successful in improving the streets west of Kostoryz Road, and if the City
retreats from this program, they will delay improvements on the west side of
the City.
Council Member McComb referred to the petition for the improvements on
Van Cura Street and noted that the petition states that the payments can be
made over a five year period at an Interest rate of 61%.
Mr. Smith explained that the current ordinance now specifies the
percentage as 8%, and Mr. McComb indicated that possibly that would nullify
this petition since the percentage of the loan for the assessments is greater at
this time. Mr. Smith explained that the ordinance was amended in September of
1981 to Increase the interest rate on assessments and at that time a grandfather
clause was included but this project does not fall in that category.
City Manager Martin pointed out that that document is a petition, not a
contract since it is just a request to the Council. He further explained that
h. _es
Reg.ular Council Meeting ,
August 31, 1983
Page 8
the grandfather clause was included in the ordinance at the time the rates were
changed and the interest was changed to exclude projects included in the 1977
bond program. He pointed out to the Council that there are a number of
petitions that are two or three years old and if the Council desires there will
be a need to reaffirm that the property owners still want the improvements or
the Council will have to approve another grandfather clause to set the lower
interest rate according to the date the petitions were signed.
Mayor Jones inquired if the Council did this would It not be true that
those on the bottom of the list would probably not have their streets improved
since more funds would be expended on other projects, and City Manager
Martin stated that that was absolutely correct. Mayor Jones then pointed out
that the Council can do anything they desire but other street projects will not
be completed if there is a need to change the payments of assessments.
Council Member Hawkins stated that the City should go back to those who
signed petitions at the lower interest rate to see if they still wanted the
improvements. He stated that this would only be fair.
A motion was made by Council Member Hawkins to direct the staff to
contact the residents of Van Cura Street if they desire to have their street
improved at this time and notify the signers of other petitions to see if they
want their streets improved at the higher interest rate before any engineering
work is accomplished.
Council Member Mendez stated that he felt that all the petitoins should be
reviewed before the City incurs too much expense for engineering, etc.
City Manager Martin pointed out to the Council that this project is for
several streets in the area and rather than conducting a survey on this one
street, he felt that all of the property owners on all of the streets should be
contacted. He agreed that prior to starting engineering work on future street
improvement projects, that the staff approach the originators of the voluntary
paving petitions to see if the people who submitted the petition would be willing
to go out to reaffirm that the residents still want improvements. He stated that
this would save the City a great deal of money.
Council Member Hawkins agreed to amend his motion to effect all of those
actions. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed
unanimously.
Also speaking in regard to the assessments was Mr. Marvin H. Wheeler and
Southern Oi1 Sales Company who stated that they have property at the
intersection of Leopard and Garfield and he does not agree to the sidewalks and
curbs that are to be constructed at that business address.
Mr. Smith identified Mr. Wheeler's property as item 15 and informed the
Council that the assessment on that property was $7,087.68.
Mr. Wheeler continued by stating that he objected to the sidewalks, he did
not agree to the improvements and he did not sign the voluntary paving
petition.
1
r1
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 9
Mr. Otto Hampton, 401 Dixon Street, stated thathe
had
He
d not
agree
voluntary paving because his wife had signed the petition.
d
was opposed to the sidewalk construction because he does not have
Dixon Street which is the street on which his property fronts and he of
having to pay for a sidewalk at the side of his property.
Mr. Smith explained that the sidewalk on the Quaile Drive portior
Hampton's property was $245 and the sidewalk on Dixon Street was $E
Smith continued by stating that the staff thought that the petition w
clear in that it included a sidewalk.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner inquired as to when the petition is returnee
second consent of the improvements, if they could make a choice as to
or not they wanted sidewalks.
Mr. Smith explained that the City is attempting to upgrade the prc
the standards in other portions of the City and they feel that the s
belong adjacent to streets.
Council Member Mendez inquired if property owners do not want
If they would still be qualified to participate in the voluntary paving
and Mr. Smith replied that this would be a decision for the Council
He reiterated that the staff is of the opinion that sidewalks are nece
upgrade a neighborhood.
Mr. Mendez stated that in his opinion, since this is in an ole
possibly there Is no need for the sidewalks.
Mayor Jones pointed out that if a subdivision was being develope
south side, the developer would be required to construct sidewalks an
of the opinion that sidewalks on the west side are needed to upgrade t
neighborhood. He stated that since there are certain standards
development and it includes curb, gutters and sidewalks, he felt that
standards should be applied all over the City.
Mr. George Deer, 3901 Quaile Drive, also objected to the inst2
sidewalks, stating that he was of the opinion that they create prob
children riding bikes, etc., on the sidewalk.
Mayor Jones inquired if bicycles are allowed to be ridden on side
City Attorney Aycock stated that there is no prohibition for riding b
sidewalks.
No one else spoke in regard to the assessments.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the public t
the assessments be recessed until the staff has an opportunity to cor
further with those who signed voluntary paving petitions; seconded L
Member Berlanga; and passed unanimously.
After further discussion pertaining to the sidewalks, City Mana
stated that he felt that this issue is independent of this case as 1
Des
Regular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 10
sidewalks are concerned. He suggested that the Council needs to address this
as a policy question - Will we do sidewalks only - or Will we do curb and
gutters only. He pointed out that this is not the time to set that policy, but
this should be done for future voluntary paving programs. He pointed out that
as of this date, the voluntary paving petitions address all improvements,
including sidewalks.
Mayor Jones stated that he would never accept a standard on the west side
that is less than that of the south side.
Council Member McComb agreed that the Council needed to be aware of the
criticism in the past that there is no consistency in what is being done
throughout the City. He stated that he understood that criticism and he
believed that the Council should be consistent in improvements, indicating his
concurrence with Mayor Jones. He pointed out that in the future, someone
might protest that the City was being unfair to those on the west side.
Council Member Hawkins stated that he did not like to use the terminology
westside/southside issue. He pointed out that if the policy is changed by the
Council, it would not affect just the west side but would affect the entire City.
Council Member Kennedy pointed out that although these particular homes
are owned by elderly people, there may be a time when the homes are sold and
younger families move into the area and they would definitely need sidewalks
for their children. He too agreed that uniform standards should be established
and maintained.
Council Member Berlanga agreed, stating that if the City adopts various
options, there would be problems and he would like to see sidewalks
constructed along with curbs and gutters.
Council Member Siavik stated that she is concerned about senior citizens
and their ability to pay assessments. She suggested that the discussion on this
subject include the possibilities of helping elderly citizens pay their
assessments.
Council Member Hawkins noted that the Council should remember that
they're discussing voluntary assessments and he agreed that they should have
• the same standards, but if property owners cannot pay their assessments, they
will be hesitant to sign a voluntary paving petition.
Mayor Jones explained the policy approved by the Council a few months
ago for Community Development Block Grant payments by which assessment
payments were deferred until the property was sold.
Mr. Smith pointed out that this policy was established a few months ago on
which projects for which federal money is used through the CDBG funding.
Council Member Hawkins pointed out that that policy does not apply to a
voluntary paving program, but only to projects funded by CDBG.
'Minutes
Regular Council' Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 11
Council Member Kennedy reminded the Council that if hardship can be
proven, the time for payment of assessments can be extended from five years to
ten years. He also pointed out that in the history of the voluntary paving
program, there have been no foreclosures on property because of an
outstanding debt on assessments.
Mr. Mendez noted that this does not really address the question of the
ability of senior citizens to pay assessments associated with voluntary paving
petitions.
City Manager Martin informed the Council that the staff cannot force
propertyiowners to circulate the petitions again in a three week time period;
therefore, this particular street improvement project could require more time
than that.
May Jones requested a report on the number of projects that have been
completed o improve the City through the volunteer paving program.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor ones announced public hearings on three zoning applications.
City Ma�i ager Martin made a general statement to the Council in regard to
zoning casesl�nd referred to the procedure followed to change the zoning. He
explained to the Council that there will be approximately three cases a week to
be -considered py the City Council.
11. Applicatio
"T -1B" Mo
Bohemian
approximate
No. 783-11 - Mr. C. T. Bach: for a change of zoning from
afi' iiTy ID -welling District and "1-2" Light Industrial District to
ile Home Park District on the north } of Lot 7, Section 8,
olony Lands, located on the east side of Ayers Street,
1 ,250' south of Holly Road.
Assistant Cit, Manager Tom Utter informed the Council that in response to
the five notices o the public hearing mailed to property owners within 200' of
the area to be c sidered, one in favor and none in opposition had been
returned. He sta d that both the Planning Commission and Planning staff
recommend approval .f this application.
Mr. Larry Wen.er, Director of Planning, located the area on the zoning
and land use map, d<scribed the land use in the surrounding area and showed
slides of the vicinity.He stated that the plans, if the zoning is approved, are
for a mobile home park.
Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak in
regard to this application.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Hawkins, and passed unanimously.
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their vote on the ordinance
effecting the change of zoning and the following was passed:
Regutes
ular Council Meeting
August 31, 1983
Page 12
TION OF C. T. BOF LOT g
GE 17E Z UPON PORTION
ORDINANCE ORDINANCE APPL1CAg1A ONE-FAMILYDWELLING
H� E
THE ZONING 1N REFERENCE
RO "T-113" TI
DING THE 'ZONING MAP LANDS TO
AMEN OIN IAL DISTRICT
CHANGING BOHEMIAN COL INDUSTRIAL
EMERGENCY.
MER Y'
SECTION 13• ND „1_2�� LIGHT (RING GENC ordinance passeKennedY
DISTRICT C rter R' AND DELLA the foregoing Hawkins,
PARK Suspended aBerlanga, Guerrero,
The Charter Rule was Turner,
vote: Jones, voting "aye".
** * * * * * * following Mendel and Slavik
McComb, for a change of
* * * * *or Helico•ters, Inc" stria) District
_3 ea.: if or o{ State
Su•eriIs ct to + miles north
No. 783-12
83-12 nzie c}str 1.5-
12. A• •lication Acres.Road,
arm -located
McKinzieo{ McKinzie public hearing had
zoning r Lots 1 and side of the p returned He
H r. Utter
44 on of the east that six noticeshad been ublicff recommend
d the Council one in opposition
planning
Mr. Utter informed ein favor an Commission
trailed and one Planning described
been t both the and land map,
stated also that on the zoning of the vicinity • staff
approval. slides " athat
area d showed „1-3 as
located the area and
was lies of t industrial Distri�oper ..
Mr. Wenger the explained
surroundingthis prop with the time. one P
the land use explained that in accordance that ment for
further He stated that atthat
,Store development
area
tenger few Years area. zoning outside of
recommendation a consultant that recommend of property west of entMcKInzlefor
r he a {ormedpiece of the property zoning•
was beingemployed i nn i t par particular p with the
a
ownernot zone any conformance staff,
the entire area. but rti is in
City Council nest with the Airport
because the „ and this particular req coordinated been coot
Road to if this has d to speak in
Mayor hones inquired it has. wished
stated that in the audience
and M• Wenger that no one
determined be closed,
Mayor Jones that the hearing
regard to this case' or Pro Tem Turner
Mayor d passed unanimously• the ordinance
A motion was made by Guerrero votes on
an
Council Member Council for their
seconded by oiled the passed:
City the zoning and dthe following was p
changing T10N OF SUPERIO
UPON APPLICATION
REFERENCE
CE 17811: DISTRICT T
ORDINANCE ORDINANCE ZONING MAP URAL
THE ZONING CHANGINGTHE"F-R" R EMERGENCY.
AMENDING INC. NZ ES, AND DECLARING AN
HELICOPTERS, McKINZIE ACRES, LOTS 1 AND 2° USTRIAL DISTRICT; n�_3„ HEAVY lND
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
LEOPARD - BALDWIN AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS
The Leopard - Baldwin Area Improvements include improvements to the following street:
1. Quaile Drive, from Villa Drive to Breckenridge Drive,
2. Garfield Drive, from Leopard Street to Westchester Drive,
3. Reeves Drive, from Garfield Drive to Westchester Drive,
4. Vancura Drive, from the South Frontage Road of I.H. 37 to Eloise Drive,
5. Eloise Drive, from Vancura Drive to Omaha Drive, and
6. Lantana Street Sidewalks, on the East Side, from North of I.H. 37 to
Saint Theresa School.
These streets shall be constructed by excavation to a width and depth to permit the
laying of a standard curb and gutter section, 6" compacted subgrade, 8" flexible
caliche base, and 11/2" Hot Mix Asphaltic pavement. Streets are to be 28' wide within
the existing right-of-way. There will be 4' or 5' wide reinforced sidewalks 4"
thick and 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways as shown on the plans or where
requested by property owners. A 6" diameter replacement water line will be construc-
ted along Vancura Drive and a 4' wide reinforced sidewalk will be constructed on
the east side of Lantana Street within the described limits.
The assessment rates have been calculated in accordance with the latest paving policy
adopted by the City. Based on this policy and the low bid submitted by Ring
Construction Company, the assessment rates are as follows:
28' Wide, BOC
4" Curb, Gutter & Pavement
6" Curb, Gutter & Pavement
Driveways
Sidewalk
Lantana Street Sidewalk
Water Line, Constructed by City Work Force
Residential Property, Schools & Churches
Curb, Gutter & Pavement
Sidewalks
Driveways
Water Line
Total Contract Price
Final Assessments
City Portion
Bid Price
$12.35 L.F.
$12.78 L.F.
$3.51 S.F.
$1.89 S.F.
$3.51 S.F.
$438,236.79
152,377.68
$285,859.11
Assessment Rate
$12.35 L.F.
$12.78 L.F.
$3.51 S.F.
$1.00 S.F.
$1.00 S.F.
$1.06 L.F.
$9.75 L.F.
$1.00 S.F.
$3.51 S.F.
$ .88 L.F.
Gerald Smith, P.E.
GS/dl ' City Engineer
1
SEPTEMBER 2Si1983
PAGE 1
DESCRIPTION TOTAL r
OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT C
PROPERTY pES4g1PL11N ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE ____AMOUNT ASSE53E0 •
ASSESSMENT ROLL CLOSING HEARING
LEOPARD-BALDWIN AREA
__STREET LMPROVESNTS
INCLUDES QUAILE,_GARFIELD _
REEVES, VAN CURA E ELOISE DRS
E LANTANA SIDEWALKS
CUA1LE DRIVE
79)M VILLA 32 TO BRECKENRIDGE DR
BEGIN NORTH SIDE
•
1 A.C. BROWN 122.50 L.F.C.G.3 PVMT. 4.88 597.80
I 1S 1908 LEOPARD 78408 8 20.00 1.F.0.3.3 PVMT. 9.75 195.00
7 LOT 13 3LK 3 490.00 S.F. 5/3 .50 245.0
11 GARDENS # 80.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 80.00
1 .N R -1B 106.30 S.F. 0/6 1-16 3.51 373.11
*CR 25 LE R1V -0- S.F. D/W 3.51 -0-
1
4
( ,5
.a
2 OTTO 3 LEOTA HAMPTON 122.50 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 4.88 597.80
401 01309 78408 * 20.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 195.00
LOT 12 BLK 3 490.00 S.F. 5/4 .50 245.00
VILLA GARDENS * 30.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 80.00
K-18 106.30 S.F. D/.r 1-16 3.51 373.11 (
*RTN DIXON )R -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
1,490.91 C
1=JI
(
(I,q'
(
(
1,490.911
DIXON DRIVE INTERSECTION jC
1"j
( . S
3 MARIA ESTELA CORTEZ
402 DIXON 78408
LOT 13 [ILK 4
VILLA GARDENS
R-18
*RTM DIXON
122.50 L.F.C.G.L PVMT.
* 20.00 1.F.0.3.6 PVMT.
490.00 S.F. S/W
e 90.30 S.F. 5/4
-0- S.F. 0/W
-0- S.F. 3/..
4.88
9.75
.50
1.00
3.51
-0-
597.80
195.00
245.00
80.00
- o-
- o-
1,117.80
"1 1.
Ij
1
r� (I
SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 PAGE 7
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
f ' ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF 440UNT
V0. PROPERTY DESCRIP_LOM ASSESSED_ ____A_SSESS_NENT -_RATE _ -_WOOS ,.__ASSESSED
27 DAVID R LOPEZ 50.00 L.F.C.G.L PVMT. 9.75 487.50
{ 330 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. -0- -0- (
QT 8 Ad( 2 200.00 S.F. _ S/ -W__ _ __ _ 1.00 _ _ -_ .200.00_.-
',00DLAN0 HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 0/4 -0-
'C RES UNIT 73.30 S.F. 0/d 1-13 3.51 257.28
-- --- - --0- S.E. D/d-------- -0- ---0=--
944.78- C
08 3ILLY 6 '•ULCER 50.03 L.F.L.G.L PVMT. 9.75 487.50
326 GARFIE_J 78408 -U- L.F.C.G.G PVMT. -0- -0- (
LOT 7 61R 2 2.30.00 S.F. S/d1.00 200.00
W000LAND HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
RES USE 85.30 S.F. 0/4 1-13 3.51 315.20
--- - -0- S.F. _ 0/9 _ _ _ =0 - ---=0 =
1.002.70
29 JANIE TREVIN3 50.00 1.F.0.0.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
i 322 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- .i(
LOT 6 BLK 2 200.00 S.F. 5/W 1.00 _ 200.00 • j
4000L330 HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
'_{ RES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/6 1-10 3.51 257.28
- 2- S.F. D/d -0- -Qm___
944.78 ' ,
L ,
30 LE9IS M SCHOTT
i 318 GARFIELD 78408
LOT 5 8LK 2
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -J-
200.00 S.F. S/9 1.00
WOODLAND HEIGHTS
t RES USE
-0- S.F. 1/4 -0-
73.30 S.F. D/W 1-10 3.51
-0- S.F. 0/4___ -0-
487.50
-0-
200.00
-0-
257.28
944.78
31 CARMEN VILLARREAL 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
314 GARFIELD 78408 -0- 1.1.0.0.0 PVMT. -0-
LOT 4 BLR_2_ -__ 200.00 S.F.S/W----___ 1.00 200.00
w00DLAN0 HEIGHT5 -C- S.F. S/3 -0- -0-
RES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/'d 1-10 3.51 257.28
- 0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
t
944.78
,�
T
C
SEPTEMBER 28. 1933 PAGE 8
DESCRIPTION TOTAL -.
f ITEM OWNER AN) QUANTITY OF
i A90341 ::!C
V0.___ PRDPE�CL3150.1 .TIOV _ ASSES -SED ASSESSMENT .MAIE__ __AMOUNT__ .-ASSESSEO_�'
---- c
32 ARNOLDO G HO9ERO 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50 ii
C 3846 LEOPARD 78410 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- i„ic
-LOT _9_BL_i7 200.00 S.F._S/_d-__--__1.00--_200.00- -----P.4W00DLANJ HEIGHTS -C- S.F. S/4 -0- -0-
C '63 USE 73.30 S.F. D/n 1-10 3.51 257.28
sC=_ S.F. 0/4
944.78 ;
33 R300180 LAUREL 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
306 GARFIELD 788408 -0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. -0- -0- (
_--LOT 2_816_2_ ______ _ _ _20C.J0 S.F._5/W __---- 1.09_--_---200.00------ ---,:�
WOODLAND HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 5/8 -0- -0-
RES USE 73.30 S.F. D/W 1-10 3.51 257.28„I(
944.78
34 G T COLLINS * 58.33 L.F.C.G.G PVMT. 9.75 568.72
. F 302 GARFIELD 78408 67.44 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 4.88 426.71
5_.4 LOT 1 RI K 2 t__233.12 -5.F. 5/4 1.00_ 233.37
<000LAND HEIGHTS *8 367.76 S.F. S/. 1.00 367.76
11. RES USE 117.33 S.F. 3/4 1-18 3.51 411.72
*FRGNT -.D- 3.E._ 3/.1 -0- -0-
**INC 1/4 EXT
2
35 HENRY 0 E GLADYS HALL
21008.23f.
4E.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75
4510 GARFIELD 7843R -0- L.F.C.G.J PVMT. -0-
468.00
-0-
48X110 FT OUT OF 192.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 192.00
SW CORNER L3T5 1 E 2 - -0- S.F. 5/4 -0- -0-
BLK_2. 93O AY1LHELGHTS _ 73.10_5_.E.__Ol.14_1-1IL__3.51 757 78
RES USE -0- S.F. 0/8 -0- -0-
C
L, C
917.28 'C
36 GARY d PITTMAN 57.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 555.75 !': C
450-6 GARFIELD_ 78408 -0- .__1.E.L.G.E_P31MT._ -3- -0- H
LOT F 8LK 2 228.33 S.F. 5/6 1.00 228.00
k 40001440 HEIo6TS C 18.30 S.F. 3/.n 1.00 18.00 L
563 113E 73.30 S.E._D/d_10-__3.51____-_-_257.28
-0- S.F. D/8 -0- -0-
1
*5/8 EXT
1.059.03 " 1_
r
fiw
C
SE2TE4BER-28. 1583___-.-�.
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
( ITEM OWNER AN) QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
V0. PROPERTY DESCRIPTIQL__ASSESSEO- ASSESSMENT__ _RATE__ AMOUNT ASSESSED
Y 1 (
37 MARGIE E HAESE TR 66.63 L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. 9.75 649.64
( 414 VILLA 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.1 P8MT. -0- -0- (
LOT K 8LK 1 266,52 S.F. S/W___ - 1.00 266.52
w OCuLANU HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 5/4 -P- -0-
j KES 328 -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0- (
-0- S.F. D/8 -0 -0 =
NESTCHESTER DRIVE
END GARFIELD
END:EAST 510E
916.16.
(
(
(
GARFIELD DRIVE
FROM 1808489 ST TO WESTCHESTER DR
4 3EGIN 8EST SIDE (
38 MAC TRANSFER 1 STORAGE C0 208.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 12.78 2,658.24 , (
P 0 80X 1678 78403 -0- L.F.0.5.1 PVMT. -D-
LOT 30A 3LK 3 716.27 S.F. 0/4 1.00 716.27
2000LAVD HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 5/4 -D- -0- (
I-2 L4AREHOUSE 291.45 S.F. 2/4 1-260 3.51 1,022.99
-0- S.F. 0/W -0- -0-
J
a
1.
L
4,397.50 (
39 JAMES W DIDEAR 75.00 L.F.C.u.E PVMT. 12.78 958.50
441 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT 303 0 5 10' LOT 30A 180.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 180.00
8LK 3, WOODLAND HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/8 -0- -0-
_COMM_USE 123.45 S.F. D/W 1-10C_-3.51__ 433.31
02F.45 S.F. 0/3 1-20C 3.51 801.86
2,373.67 C
I. - 40 JOHN R LENCEFIELD 55.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 536.25 C
_BOX 375 -----0-L.F.C.G.EPVMT. -0 ----_-0 --__--
JOHNSON CITY TX 7.3636 220.30 S.F. S/4 1.00 220.00
LOT 29 918 3 -2- S.F. S/4 -0- -0-
_ ,,LCDLAND HEIGHTS 73.30 S.F. D/3 1-10 3.51 257.28
RES USE -0- S.F. 0/14 -0- -0-
1,013.53 I_
C
1
S,PTE16ER_28,_ 1333 _
-- ------ - ---PAGE 10 --
DESCRIPTION -MAL{ - ITEM 7WNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT (
NO. PR3PERIILDESCRIPTI74.__ ASSESSED _- ASSESSMENT__ RATE . AMOUNT _-__ ASSESSED___'
(
-.1 JUAN ALV5FAD7 ET 110 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
( 433 GARFIELD 76408 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- (
LOT 28 81K_3______ . _ 230.77 S.F. S/2 _.__ -_ 1.00 200.00
,LOLANO HEIGHTS 9 24.00 S.F. S/2 1.20 24.00
`,ES U56 73.30 S.F. 0/'U 1-1) 3.51 257.28
'•S/V, EXT._ -_ -3- S.F. D/A_ -0- -0-
c
c
4
t
t
968.78- ,
--
.2 21AN ROJRIGUE2 ET Jx 50.3) L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
1534 11TH 78408 -L- L.F.C.G.d PV.T. -0- -2-
1_JT_27.8LtL_3 __ ____- - 236.3) S.F. S/. 1.00 202.00
4700LANU HEIGHTS * 24.70 S.F. S/8 1.00 24.00
RES USE 73.30 S.F. D/H 1-10 3.51 257.28 (
9S/W_EXT ---_- - - __ _ -- -C- _S.F._ D/W
43 GRADY L MALDNE
425 GARFIELD 78408
LOS 26 RIK3 -
n00DLAND HEIGHTS
,ES USE
968.78
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
_230.00 S.F. S18 _-. __1.00___ -20
-0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
.9.65 S.F. 0/8 .53022 3.51 244.47
-0- S.E. 0/. _ -Q._ -0-
931.97
44 RJdEN 43RALES ET UX 50.00 L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
:MARY '100152MERY -0- L.F.C.S.L PVMT. -0- -0- C
421 GARFIELD 784 2130.00 5.0. 516 1.90 200,00
LOT 25 SLK 3 -0- S.F. 5/W -0- -0- �,
2000LAN0 HEIGHTS 69.65 S.F. D/4 .50F22 3.51 244.47 t
RES_115E- _69.65 S.F. 0/4_.50F22_ -3.5L 744.47
1.176.44
C
45 MARY MAE MONTGOMERY 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
i 417 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E 0119T. -0- -0- C
LUT 24_6LK_3_. _ _- 200.00 S.E._S/W___ 1.00___-_200.00-_ _ _ ___
.000LANJ HEIGHTS -1.- S.F. S/. -7- -0-
PES UNIT 69.55 S.F. 0/'6 .50F22 3.51 244.47 (,
-6 _ _ S.F. D/A -0- -0-
931.97
L
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993 __ ____ PAGE 11
DESCRIPTION T3TAL
. ITEM ONNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOJNT
10. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSED ASSEUMENT_ RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED _
f,, e
t.
f
46 DOYLE E 3ODCH 50.00 1.0.0.5.1 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
RT 2 BOX 145 -0- 1.F.0.2.0 PVMT. -0- -0-
__S_EMINOLE, TX -79360 ______ _ 200.00 S.F. 5/d _- __-_1.00 _200.00_
LOT 23 9LK 3 -C- S.F. S/4 -0- -0-
7 ,000LANJ HEIGHTS 117.30 G.F. 0/4 1-13 3.51 411.72
PBS USE -_--- - -C- S.F. 0/& - _--0-------_-0- - -
-- - - - 1,099.22.
463 OOYLE E .COC- 50.00 1.0.0.0.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
PT 2 33X 145 -0- L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. -0- -0- (
SEMINULE, TX 79360 2.7C.00 S.F. 3/W 1.00 200.00
LOT 22 ALK 3 -0- S.F. 5/W -3- -0-
1 - WOODLAND HEIGHTS 73.30 S.F. D/'W 1-10 3.51 257.28 (
RES IZSE _ - -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0-
944.78
l.
47 JESUS RABAGO
405 GARFIELD 78408
LDT_21 8 3
40001350 HEIGHTS
RES USE
85/W EXT
50.00 L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-0- L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. -0- -0-
200.30 S.F. S/y{�z00 200.00
8 15.00 S.F. S/n 1.00 15.00
73.3) S.F. 0/4 1-10 3.51 257.28
- C- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
48 EDNA VINYARD
4330 COTTAGE 78415
LOT 20 ALK 3
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-0- 1.8.0.0.0 PVMT. -0- -0-
200.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00
WOODLAND HEIGHTS
PES USE
959.78 .
(
-0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
73.30 S.F. 0/8 1-10 3.51 257.28 t
-0- 5_,F. 0/W _ - __. _-0 -.-_ -0-
944.78 i
C
49 L DEWITT HALE
7106 M0VT4N4 VORTE
_ AUSlaN_TX 78741__
4'J5T1N TX 78731
137 19 BLK 3
7J3ODLAND H1 IGHTS
RES USE
50.00 1.0.0.0.2 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-5- L.F.C.3.1 PNMT. -0-
2)0.00 S.F.S/w 1.00 _ -__ 200.00
- 1- S.F. S/3 -0- -0-
73.30 S.F. U/. 1-10 3.51 257.28
-0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0
944.78 C
C7
L
. SLPIEY.6ER_..28.._158.3_ _ - _-- _-- __-_ -_ - _-PAGE - 12__._
DESCRIPTION 73741
T. ITEM OWNER ANO QUANTITY OF A40U4T . C
V0,-___ _280PESTy_2ESC&IPTIGN _ _.ASSESSED_ ASSESSMENT RATE __ AMOUNT - ASSESSED__
50 FRANK A RYAN
• 341 GARFIELD 78408
-_LJ_T 18 BLK 3_
1000LAND HEIGHTS
RES USE
51 JAMES 8 302.55
337 GIRFIELO 78408
LOT .17_0111/4_3
400DLAN0 HEIGHTS
RES USE.
.S/H_FXT___
52 FREDERIC< L CRONK
333 GARFIELD 78408
LUT1b_BLK_3
1000LAND HEIGHTS
n1S USE
__ILLA_EXI
50.10 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
2)0.30 S.F. S/4__ 1.00_ 200.00
-0- ,.F. S/s -0- -0-
34.30 S . 7/2 1-12 3.51 295.80
-C- a.F. 3/4. . -0 -0
983.39-
c
Q
_-
50.00 L.F.C.3.1 PV"T. 9.75 - 487.57
-P- L.F.C.G.R PVMT. -0- -0(
-
230.3] S.F. S/2 _ _- 1.00_ _ 200.00_
$ 17.30 S.F. 5/0 1.20 18.00
75.30 S.F. D/,, 1-10 3.51 257.28
- 0- S.F._D/8
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
-231.Z9_S.F._S/N _ _ 1.00 _ ..23129___
O 12.00 S.F. S/4 1.00 12.00
73.30 S.F. 0/4 1-10 3.51 257.28
- 0 ___S.F. 0/4 __ 2222___-0 __ _ _ -0___
962.78 (
(
988.07
53 R4FAFL 4 PI1443 JR 51.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
329 054715LD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
__ LDI_15 81.K_3 L72.5__S.14_S/4- 1.00 172..57.
NUOULANO HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 5/4 -0- -0-
RES USE 71.43 S.F. D/5 1-12T 3.51 250.72 C
- 0- - S.F. 0/4 __ D- -0-
54 P4310 P SALINAS
325 GARF IELD 78408
LUL14- U.K. 3
..5001430 HEIGHTS
',ES USE
910.79
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- L
152.57 S.F. 5/4 1.00_-__182_.57
-C- S.F. 5/. -0- -0-
'2.43 S.F. 3/w 1-10T 3.51 219.13 L
-C- S.F._J/n-- 0 --- -- -0 - ---
889.20
L
C
_SEPTEMBER 28._1283 __. _._ _ .__ --._ PAGE_13
DESCRIPTION T3TAL
ITEM OWNER AN) OUANTI TY OF AMOUNT 1;1C
PRJPERTY DE SSRIPTIDM___ ASSESSED _.ASSESSMENT __._-RATE-AMOUNL ASSESSED.__''
55 4RTURO BARRON
321 GARFIELU 78408
LOT 13 5131 3
1DODLANO HCIOHIS
9 C uSE
''S/w_F{T
56 01201.13 L LAUuHLI'I
1/0 DELI1 DIRRIENTES
317 GARFIELD 7E4)8
LOT 12 BLK 3
430014,10 HEIGHTS
RES USE
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
2013.00 S.F. S/W _ 1.00 200.00.
10.30 S.F. 5/4 1.30 18.00
73.33 S.F. 3/64 1-13 3.51 257.28
- 0- S.F._ 0/4 _ -3 _ _ 707__-_
51.0C L.F.L.o.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-0- L. F.C.G.& P3MT. -0- -0-
200.30 S.F. 5/4 1.00 200.00
- 0- S.F. S/w -0- -0-
73.30 S.F. D/w 1-10 3.51 257.28
-q-_ S.F. D/n -0 -0-
,.J
962.78.
C
944.78
57 WANDA F EAT 3N 50.00 1.0.0.0.1 PV11T. 9.75 487.50
4913 LAVACA 78411 -0- L. 0.0.1.1 PVMT. -0- -0- I(
_
LOT 11 81,.3 3 _____20P.03 S.F._ $/W_ 1.90 200.00 J
5000LAN0 HEIGHTS -C- S.F. 5/4 -0- -0-
RES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/.. 1-11 3.51 257.28
-0- S.F. 0/4 _-0
944.78 C
58 AJGUSTIV NIETO JR 50.00 1.0.0.0.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
L .. 309 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.S.& PVMT. -3- -0-
LOT 10 BLK 3 290.30 S.F. 5/4 1.30 200.00
WOODLAND HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 5/5 -0-1
-0-
t RES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/3 1-10 3.51 257.28 P t
- 0__ S.F. D/4 -7- -0-
944.78 C
53 30NIFAC13 V GARCIA 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 9.75 487.50
'� 305 GARF IELO 78408 -0- 1.0.0.0.1 PVMT. -0- -0- " L
LOT 9 51( 3 200.00 S.F. S/3 _ 1.00.__ __ 200.00 _ _._ 1
.07:001 ANJ HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/4 -3- -0-
S ',ES USE 76.80 S.F. D/A 1-10 3.51 276.59
- 0- S.F. 3/5 -0- -0 ---
L
964.09
6
c
___SEPIE;18111_28,_1983 - _ _ -__- _ __-_ .__ __- - _. PAGE 14_ __.._
DESCRIPTION TOT41
ITEM O44ER A43 QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
VU.__PROPER Y DESCRIPTION ASSESSED _ ASSESSMENT __RATE _ _ AMOUNT ASSESSED _
60 WANUA F EATON
4913 LAVACA 78411
_-_ LUT d 8LK
9360LANJ hEIGHTS
RES USE
61 c STEBAN 3 LJ'tL CT U<
4525 GARFIELD 78400
LUT 7_81K _i_ -
WOODLAND HEI33T5
RES USE
46.01 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 448.60-
-0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. -0- -0-
184.04 S.F. S/d __ _ 1.30 _ 184.04_
- - S.F. 5/4 -0- -0-
73.30 5.-. D/e 1-1) 3.51 257.23
- 0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
-.L.)1 L.F.C.G.E PV4T. 9.75 448.60
PVMT. -0- -0-
134.04 S.F. S/3 1.00--__-__ 194.34_
-C- S.F. S/4 -0- -0-
80.80 S.F. D/4 130F24 3.51 283.61
._-C- S.F. D/31
62 DAVID HERNANDEZ 46.04 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 9.75 448.89
4521 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. -0- -0-
-Lf1T 6 8L/.3 - 184.16S.F. SI4 ___- ___1.00 . _184.16_--
WOODLAVD HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/4 -0- -0-
RES USE 65,40 S.F. D/s 11024 3.51 245.00
-_-0- .5..E.__D/, -a- -4._
889.92.
916.25
878.05
(
(
(
(
63 HOLA400 A GOMEZ 50.00 L.F.C.G.G PVMT. 9.75 487.50
4517 GARFIELJ 78408 -D- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- (
L_OT__SBLL .3 2J0.)_.0 S,F._S/n 1.00 20Q...00________
40006460 HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/4 -0--0-
RES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/4 1-10 3.51 257.28 �� C
-Il _-S.F. 0/4 ___ __-0 -0-
64 FRANK E DOLORES BOLAVOS
4513 038116LD 18408
LOT_4_8UL3-
:.CODLANO HEIGHTS
'3S JSE
5C.30 L.F.C.G.G PVMT. 9.75 487.50
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
200.00 S.F._S/d _- _1.00__ --_ 200.00
-3- S.F. 5/4 -a-
/3.30 S.F. 0/W 1-10 3.51 257.28
- L_ - S.F. 3/4 -_ -0 _ _ - _ -0 _ -
944.78
944.78
•
a'
SEPTEMBER_ 28a_ 1.33 __ ___ _ _. __RAGE__15___- _
DESCPIPTION MAL
. ITEM OWNER AN) QUANTITY OF AMOUNT , (
40. PR)PERTY DESCRIPTION ___ ASSESSED _ ASSESSMENT ___RALE _- _43QUNL _ASSESSED
(
65 USVALDO TRJJILLO ET UX 50.00 L.F.C.G.E, PVMT. 9.75 487.50
4509 GARFIELD 78408 -C- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
L0T 3 8L< 3 _- _ __-200.00 S.F. S/8 _ _ _1.00 20000__
WGOOLANO HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/.8 -0- -0-
+ SES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/3 1-10 3.51 257.28
-0- S.F. 3/n _- -0 -0 __-
944.78-
66 LARRY 440939 50.00 L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
4505 GARFIELL 78409 -0- L.F.C.O.& PVMT. -J- -0- (
LOT _38LK3__ _ 2.30.00 S.F. S/n 1.00_ ___200_.00_
WOODLAND HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/N -0- -0-
RES USE 73.30 S.F. 0/8 1-10 3.51 257.28 (
-------- -- - --- - -- --=0- S.F._ 0/4 - -- - -=0 - --Q ---
944.78
67 MS HUUSTON 8 YOAKUM 34.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 331.50
309 HACKBERRY -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- (
SINTON_TX 78387_ 136.00 S.F.S/W 1.00 136.00 ,A
LOT L 80< 3 -0- S.F. 5/W -0- -0-
e 8000LAN0 HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0- (
RES USE -0- S.F. 0/.1 -0- -0-
467.50 '
WESTCHESTER DRIVE
END GARFIELD
ENO NEST SIDE
,e
PEEVES DRIVE_____
GAREIELO 0FIVE TO WESTCHESTER OR
BEGIN NORTH SIDE (
68 9EN OE LOS SANTOS 113.44 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- C
S 402 GARFIELD 78408 -0 LF.C.G.E_PVMT. =0- -0- �9
F-23 LOT 1 8LK 1 453.76 S.F. S/'d -0- -0-
.. ..0000ANJ HEIGHTS -0- S.F. S/A -0- -0-
- LS JSE 117.30 S.F. D/n 1-18 -0- _ _ -0
__- - - _-- -0- S.F. 0/8 -0- -o--
.00 (
'C
?'
ShetES ER -28.. 1983_ ----------- _ _ .-- — -----.---PAGE__16
DESCRIPTION
f ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY DF
NO.___PROPEP.7Y.DESCRIPTION._— 145SESSED.__ _ASSESSMEIVT______RATE--__ AMOUNT
'c
c
TOT4L
AMOUNT 1:;
ASSESSED_.
69 VIKING PERFORATORS INC 199.00 L.F.C.G.G PVMT. 12.78 21543.22„i
i 312 WACO 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- ',,.0
_-LOT _ 9 SLK -1___ 796.00 S.F. S/3 _ _ _. 1.00 __796.00_ -
4000LANJ HEIGHTS -C- S.F. S/. -0-
1-2 -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0- (
-- -- -- _ -- ---- -C- S.F. D/4 -0-- --- - -0-----
{
3,339.22.
WESTCHESTER DRIVE
ENO NORTH SIDE C
PEEVES DRIVE :n (
GARFIELO_DR _T0_ WESTCHESTER DR
.ELIN SOUTi S1JE
-_-
79 RUDY M .4ENDEZ ET UX 1)7.36 L.F.C.G.E PVMT.
S 342 GARFIELD 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- I C
Fr24__L0T 10 RI K 7 429.44_ S.F. S/W _ -0-
W00DLAND HEIGHTS -0- S.F. 6/3 -0- -0-
RES USE 1)6.30 S.F. 0/4 1-16 -0- -0- C
_ 113.5 J_S.E,_D1.U_L-L7 1 -0-
. C
71 C. C GASKET PACKING CC 134.00 L.F.C.G.E PV40. 12.78 2,479.32
0/0 JACK MILLER -C- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
__P_C_BTlK 74i1-741._12__ _(x56.00 1. F. SLW_ 1.00 65.4l_U0-_
LOT A-3 8LK 2 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
WOODLAND HEIGHTS 333.45 S.F. D/d 1-300 3.51 1,170.41 C-
_ -- L-7 -O S.F. D/3 -0-- -Or_ .d
4,305.73 -
C
WESTCHESTER DRIVE
ENC REEVES DRIVE
END SOUTH .SIDE_
VAN_CURA_ DRIVE-
9EGIN EAST SIDE
72 J L dACUN ET UK eC.61 L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. 9.75 593.85
426 VAN CURA 73408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- _ C
l OT 75 RLIL_L_ _ __ 2O2.4e1 S.L.-S/d 1 00 _202_.40
VAN CURA ADDITION -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- ]
R-19,2 RES * 73.30 S.F. D/3 1-40 -0- -0- ,/,1L
- —*CL SI-DLW— -D- S.F D/d_--.____-0-
15.00 ,THER L= d-LI"IE .88 13.20
. ___-SEPTEMBER_2d, 1183 _ PA.E17
DESCRIPTION T0T4L
i ITEM CdNE8 AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT (
93. __ PROPERTY 01505181104 - _ASSESSED , ASSESSMENT _ _RATE ___AMOUNT__ __ASSESSED
(
73 FIGUEROA HERBERT Jt
• 922 VAN CUF4 79408
LOT 24 815 2
VAN CURA AJJITIUN
^-18,1 RCS
*S/., EST
50.00 L.F.C.G.G PVNT. 9.75
-0- L.F.C.G.E P99T. -0-
200.00 S.F. S/W 1.00
18.00 S.F. S/8 1.00
85.30 S.F. 0/4 1-14 3.51
-c- S.F. 0/4 -0-
50.00 OTHER LP W -LINE .88
487.50
- 0-
200.00
18.00
334.50
- 0-
44.00
(
(
1,084.00 (
74 JCSSIt C SALUANA sC.0J L.F.C.G.i PANT. 9.75 437.50
'/0 "!ARCELIFI G TO8PES - L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. -3- -0- _ ___ _
918 94'4 1084 73408 20G.00 S.F. S/6 1.00 200.00
LOT 23 8LR 2 -C- S.F. S/. -0- -0- (
VAN CUR4 ADDITION - _ _ _ ___13.30 S.F. 0/8 1-10_ 3.51 257.28
-13, 18ES JUT -0- S.F. '3/4 -7- -0- _
50.00 JTHCR LF 6 -LINE .55 44.09
988.18
75 L L LARCADE EST 50,00 L.F.C.G.,. P997. 9.75 487.5Q___ ______ __
C/0 J E LAKCAO4 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVNT. -0-
1702 RICHLANO JR 230.00 S.F. 5/W 1.00 200.00 (
^[CHIR JSONTd 75031 3- S.F. S/:d -0- -0-
LUT 22 BLK 2 73.30 S.F. D/13 1-10 3.51 257.23
R-18, 1 RES UVIT 73.30 5.8. 0/4 1-13 3.51 257.28 (
_ 50.00 OTHER L6 41 -LIRE 88 44_00_____ _
1,24606
76 dENITO GARCIA 50.00 L.F.C.G.6 PM/MT. 9.75 487.50
910 VAN CURA 78408 -G- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0-
LOT 21 BLK 2 _ 230.00 S.F. 5/13 1.00_____ _200.00
VAN 61334 ALJITIOV -C- S.F. S/o' -O- -0-
8-10,1 RES 73.30 S.F. U/4 1-13 3.51 257.28
-0- S.F. J/A -1- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF 4 -LINE .88 44.00
77 /RtSIL1AVA GARCIA
''06 V4N CUF4 75408
LOT 20 8LK 2
VAN CURA ADDITION
R-18,1RES
PS/4 EXT
C
(
983.78 (.
0.00 1.8.0.3.3. PVNT. 3.75 487.50 L
L. F. C. C. E PVA +T. -0- -0-
210.00 S.F. S/4 1.00 200.00
8 12.00 S.F. S/, 1.00 12.00 L
_ __73.30 S.F. 0/8 1-10 3.51 __--257.28
S.F. 0/.4 -0- -0-
30.00 OTHER LF 4 -LINE .88 44.00 C-
1,100.78_
-1,200.78_
•
r
411”1---
SEPTEMBER-285_08
SEPTEMBER-28iL983.___ _-__ __._. _.__ -.- _.PAGE_ 18_ ___ __
DESCRIPTION TJTAL
ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
VU, _2RJP.ERTY_DESCRIPTION __ _ _ ASSESSED _ _ ASSESSMENT _RATE_ ___AMOUNT_ ___.__ _ASSESSED ._
78 ANTONIO FERNANDEZ
902 VAN CURA 78408
LOT _19.8LK_2_..
305 CUBA ACDITIUN
a -11J. 1 IES UVIT
19 .INTONIO FER1413E7 LT UC
)3Z_E JAY CURA 13408
LOT 18 BLK 2
V4N CORA 410ITI0V
50.00 L.F.1.2.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
- 0- 1.F.1.5.1 PVMT. -0- -0-
200.00 S.F.5!n_ 1.30 200.00-__ _
-C- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
34.30 S.F. 0/n 1-12 3.51 295.89
_-0- S.F. 0/r
50.33 OTHER LF W -LINE .8B 44.00
50.30 0.5.1.5.1 P7MT. 9.15 487.50
-7- L.F.C.G.1 PVMT. -'J_ _ _ -0-
200.30
0..200.30 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00
- 0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
- 0- S.F. 014 _ __-0- ___ _ -0-_ _.
-C- S.F. 0/4 -9- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF W-OINE .88 44.00
(
(
(
(
1.027.39 (
(
(
- 731.50_
I'?
__90_LUCILLE_K GDTSHEB_.. __.___.__ 5C.00_L.F.C.G.E PVIIT. _ 9.75 483_.50.-__-_H
962 VAN CUPA 78408 -0- L. F.C.3.1 PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT 17 8LK 2 237.00 S.F. 5/4 1.39 200.00 C
_ __ Vi1N_C.JRA AO.OILIUN__ __. _. _ 15.00_ S.E. Slot_ _ __ _1.00_-___18.00._._- _ _ _
R-18. 1 RES UVIT 73.30 S.F. 0/3 1-10 3.51 257.28 '"
tS/W EXT -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- ,,C
_50.0D_DIRER _LF W -LINE___ .88 -44.00 '�
1.006.78
81 J A TROGLIV 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
358 VAN CURA 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT-16_BLK 2 __- _ - _- _-230.00_ S.F. S/w _ _ ___1.00 -100..00____
'JAN CURA 3339 -0- S.F. S/'W -0- -0-
P-18. 1 RES UNIT 73.3) S.F. J/'W 3.51 257.28
-C- 5.F..D/W--- -Or_ -- --
50.00 OTHER LF .88 44.00
(
988.78 1
02 LJ ISA LOA 9533050 )V.O3 3.F.1.1.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50 1
354 VAN_CUR1L75438__ _ _ _ _ - - L.F.C.0.& PVMT.___ -0- -- _ -0-
LOT 15 BLK 2 200.00 S.F. S/8 1.00 200.00
VAN CURA 40)11109 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- 1
R=18. 1 RES_1JV17. __ __ _ _117.30 S.F. 0/W 1-18___. 3.5L_____-411.72
-C- S.F. 0/a -0- -0-
L 57.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.30 - Cr
---- 1.143.22
i 1 1
(
SEP7011dER 28, 1983._ -__- - PAGE_ 19_
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT C
_NO, PR3PERTY_ DESCRIPTION_ _ _ ASSESSELZ___ASSESSMENT ____ RATE AMDUNT__._..__45SESSED
83 0E4ETRIO 000733EOA 50.00 L.F.C.G.L PVHT.
{ 850 VAN CURA 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.0 PVHT.
LOT 14 DLK 2 ___ _ _ _ _ 200.00,0.F. 0/8_
V1N CUK4 1JJITION -0- S.F. S/.
u-10 34.30 S.F. 3/4 1-12
-0- S.F. 3/4
50.00 OTHER LF h -LINE
9.75 487.50
-0- -0-
1.00 _ _ _ ___ 200.00_ __
-0- -0-
3.51 295.89
-0- -0-
.88 44.00
(
(
(
1,027.39 (
o30 353ETRI1 LASTA9E34 50.30 L.F.C.G.0 PVHT. 9.75 487.50 (
_ _ 357 VAN CORA 73400 __ _ -0- L.F.C.G.L PVMT.-0- -0- _
LGT 13 OLK 2 200.00 S.F. 0/4 1.00 200.00
YAN CUBA ADDITION 8 18.00 S.F. 5/4 1.00 18.00 (
R -1B, 1 RES_UVIT 84.30 S.F. D/W1-12__3.51 __._295.89_
'S/.+ LAT -C- S.F. 0/3 -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF h -LIME .88 44.00 (
1,045,39
__84 ELI2ABETH_RLALKER 50,00_L.F.Ce0.C_ pVMT,__9.75_______4_87,i0-__ -_
342 VAN CUBA 73408 -C- L.F.C.d.E PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT 12 8LK 2 200.00 S.F. S/4 1.00 200.00 (
VAN CURA AOJITIOV o 12.10 S.F. S/21.00 12.00 '
8-18, 1 RES UNIT 73.30 S.F. 0/4 1-10 3.51 257.28 �',
*S/W EXT -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .8.8 4400
1,000.78
85 LOUIS H TEEL 50.00 L.F.C.G.L PVMT. 9.75 487.50
v 838 VAN CORA 78408 -C- L. F.C.0.6 PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT 11 BLK 2 200.30 S.F. S/8 _ 1.00 _ _200.90_
'JAN CURB 430ITI05 -3- S.F. 5/0 -0- -0-
't 8-18, 1 RES UNIT 73.30 S.F. D/* 1-10 3.51 257.28
-0- S.F. 0/3 -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
35 CONSUELD F L3?EZ 44.03 L.F.C.G.L PVMT. 9.75 487.50
334 VA9 CUS478408 -D- L.F.C.3.0 81/47. -0- -0-
LOT 10 SLK 2 200.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00
VAN CURA ALDITI09 * 16.00 S.F. S/8 1.00 18.00
______R_ -_,__I RE$ UNIT _73.30 S.F. 0/'4.1-10 _3.51 _. 257.28_
3S/4 631 -C- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF a -LINE .88 44.00
(
t-
988.78
988.78 1
1,006.78
1
1
S_PTE780R_28e_ 1433----- -----_ _ _ _ -_-PAGE-20_-
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
ITEM OWNER AN) QUANTITY OF A4OUNT
44..___-PSJP_ERTYDESCRTPTIU_N. _ASSE351 ASSESSMENL___ _RATE_._._3M0UNL-. ASSESSED__J'I
87 CHARLES HINSUN 50.00 L.F.C.G.a PVMT. 9.75 487.50
830 VAN CURA 743408 -0- L.F.C.G.B PVMT. -0- -0-
- LGT9_BL4_2 __ _ 200.00 S.F. 5/4 _ _ 1.00 _ ___ .200.00_
VAN CUBA ACOITION -0- S.F. S/n -0- -0-
P-18, VAC4NT LOT -C- S.F. 0/'4 -0- -0-
-�i
S.F. Obi --- -0 __ -'- -o-
50.00 OTHER LF W -L1 NE .88 44.00
731.50 (
35 JESUS GJIZALES 50.00 L.F.C.G.;. PVMT. 9.75 487.50 (
:/0TJ_30WEY -C- _ L.E.G.G. F._ PVMT. -0-_.__ -0-
826
0 826 VAN CUBA 78408 200.00 S.F. S/W 1.30 200.00
LOTS 8 BLK 2 -0- S.F. S/3 -0- -0- '- (
_ _ VON_CURA_AD01I 155 _ _ _.__ 73.30_S.F..0/4_1-10_ . 3.51 257,28 _-
0-18. 1 1ES UNIT -L- S.F. 0/4 3.51 -0-
50.00 0THtR LF W-1111 .98 44.00 (
_ 88A_7HtESAP£NA_ _ ____ _ ____ _ _ ___50.00 L.E.C. G. E PVML. _ 9.I5. ____ ___487.50
C/0 T 0 80WEA -0- 1.F.5.0.E PVMT. -0- -0-
,322 VAN CUBA 78405 200.00 S.F. S/n 1.00 200.03 (
LOT/ _8LK_2 __.___- . __ _ 18.09 _S.E._S/W. __ _1.00-__ 18.00
VAN CURA ADDN 73.30 S.F. 0/W 1-10 3.51 257.28
R-18.1 RES UNIT -0- S.F. D/3 -0- -0- �;��(
4S/W FXT
98878_
l(
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00 1,006.78
(
`J r
{
t
SEPTEMBER 28, 1983
ITEM
NO.
c
P 3IE_ 21
TOTAL
A4OUNT
_ASSESSED__,
DESCRIPTION
OWNER AN) QUANTITY OF
PRDPEETY_DESLAIPIION ASSESSED_ __ASSESSMEN.L_._RATE AMOUNT
89 CALVIN R PATRICK 100.00
4525 GOLLIHAR NO. 122 78411 -0-
L015E 6 9L1_2 _-_--- -__40_0.00
VAN CURA ALDITION -0-
R-18, 3 21.5 USE 34.30
-L-
100.00
93 HERMAN GRAY ET UX
.0 808 4150 78403
LOTS 3 & 4 8LK 2
VAN CURA ADDITION
_-_R_1_B, 1 RES UNIT
91 LEO J PAULAS 5R
809 OMAHA 78408
LOT 2 BL< 2
VAN CJRA AWN
C
c
L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75
L.F.C...E PVMT. -0-
5.F. 5/W_ __. _ 1.00
S.F. 5/4 -3-
5.F. 0/4 1-12 3.51
S.F. 0/4 -0-
OTHER LF W -LINE .88
100.00 L.F.C.J.E PVMT. 9.75
-L- L.F.C.3.EP8MT.-J-
400.00 S.F. S/4 1.00
-0- S.F. S/W -0-
84.30 S.F. 0/W1-123.51
73.30 S.F. 0/9 1-1) 3.51
W -LINE .38
975.00
-0-
400.00
- 0-
295.89
-0-
88.00
975.00
- 0-
400.00
-0-
295.89
257.28
66.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 643.50
R-18
*S/W NOT CONSTRUCTED
**SIDE
1,758.89.
;.(i
1_928.17 -
rj
Jc
** 112.40 L.F.C.G.E, PVMT. 4.88 548.51
* -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
-0- S.F. S/W -0-
-0- S.F. D/A -0- -0-
-0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0- C
66.00 DIRER LF
1,250.09
92 LABORS INTERNATIONAL
UNION NA AFECIO LCL 1179
801 ON4H4 78404
ELOISE STREET
e
120.03 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 12.35
- 0- L.F.C.0.E PVMT. -0-
- 0- 5.F. 5/W -0-
1,482.00
-0-
- 0-
C
LOT 1 618 2
VAN CURA ADDITION
1-2
*ND 5/W CONSTRJCTE)
-0- S.F. 5/3 -0-
71.43 S.F. D/W 1-12 3.51
71.43 S.F. 0/W 1-12 3.51
OMAHA DRIVE
2ND VANJ R1LL0_ISE
END EAST 510E
- 0-
250.72
250.72
1,983.44 CI
,I L
�=l
.fit
SE_P_IE'SBER 2E. 1933
ITEM OWNER AND
V0• PROPERTY DESCRLPI1091
1(
PAGE_ 22
DESCRIPTION TOTAL ,11
QUANTITY OF AMOUNT i'I (
ASSESSED_ __ASS_ESS1ENZ RAT E.__.JLMUUNI__ASS.ESSED __ I
VAN LURA DRIVE
I.H. 37 ACCESS TO OMAHA DRIVE „I(
BEGIN WESL _SIDP
93 JC_ti1H1ODEVJR g 35,00_ I.F.C._G.G PVMT._ _ 9,75_ .___. __341.25
5726 HAMPSHIRE 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0-
L OT
0-LOT 24 BLK 1 200.00 S.F. S/W 1.30 200.00
V ANSURA_ADOLTI 3V _-0-____S.F. . S/W__. -0- -0-
(
(
P-18, VACANT LJT -0- S.F. 3/8 -0- -0-
*CR 15 LF :EG RIM - - S.F. D/4 -0- -0- : C
50.00_O_THER_.1F_ 0-LLNE__.88 __54.09_.___
585.25'•
1_`I (
34 1IIGUEL PINOV ET UX 50.00 L.F.C.G.a PVMT. 9.75 487.50
1. 418 MOHAWK 78434 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
1 1T 23 81 K 1 209.90 S F. S/,1_ _L. 0 CL__ _200.00
VAN CURA ADDITI34 * 18.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 18.00
t R -1B, 1 AES 1.0117 69.65 S.F. D/W L10F22 3.51 244.47
*S/W P17-0=-S.E.-D/W -0- -0-
50.30 OTHER LF W -LI NE .B8 44.00
993.97 ,.
95 JOE M NAJAR
917 VAN LURA 78408
SU.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75
-0- L F E.G.E 8853. -0-
487.50
-0-
LOT 22 ALK 1 201.30 S.F. S/8 1.00
( dVAN CUBA ADDITION
-0- S.F. S/8 -0- -0-
^ R-15. I RES LINT 61.0.5-4...f , J3
-0- S.F. D/W -0- -0-
( 50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00 1„ t-
925. 92-
t ) (
,»1
s31
171
C.
200.00
(
(
In (
b H FIGUFROA_JR-FT 1IX 50 OOJ_ E.C.. E PV MI48.7 50
922 VAN CUR. 78408 -0- L. F. C. G.E P8MT. -0- -0-
LOT 21 BLK 1 230.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00
_VAN C1IRA_AWILT10N-0-_S.F._s/W =0- -0-
5-18, 1 RES UNIT 73.30 S.F. 0/8 1-10 3.51 257.28
-0- S.F. 3/9 -0- -0-
�`v 39 CTHER_LF _W - LINE_ .B8 54.90
C
SEPTEMBE5 28, 19833 PAGE 23
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
N O___PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED
1
c
97 RAUL RA4IREZ ET UX 50.00 L.F.C.G.B PVMT. 9.75 487.50
• 421 SCOTT DRIVE 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. -0- -0- ,(
LOT_20LBLA 1 2.00.00 S.F. S/W 1.00_____ -_200.00_ -
VAN LURA ADDITION -0- S.F. 5/8 -0- -0-
6-18, 1 VES UNIT 73.30 S.F. D/W 1-10 3.51 257.28
- 1- 5.F. 0/8 -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
988.78, ,
9a HORTENCIA ALVAREZ 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50 (
9)5 VAN CORA 78408 -n- L.F.C.G.G PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT 19 8LK 1 200.00 S.F. 5/4 1.00 200.00
VAN CURA ADDITION -0- S.F. S/8 -0- -0-
R-18, 1 RES UNIT 84.30 S.F. 0/8 1-12 3.51 295.89 _____
- 6- S.F. 0/8 -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER LF h -LINE .8844.00(
1x_027.39
99 KENNETH 3 CLAW503
901 VAN CUI& 78408
LOT 18 8LK 1
VAN CORA ADDITION
R -1B, 1 RES UNIT
50.00 L•F.C.G.G PVMT. 9.75 487.50
-0- L.F.C.G.0 PVNT. -0- -0-
200.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00
- 2- S.E. 5/8 . -0- -0-
84.30 S.F. 0/4 1-12 3.51 295.89
-0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
5009 OTHER LF W--4INE .88 44.00
1-1
.'c
C
1,027.39 ,
100 EDGAR GOOD ET UX 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 9.75 487.50
865 VAN CURA 78408 -0- 1.8.1.0.E PVMT. -0- -0- i C
LOT 17 OLK 1 200.00 S.F. $/W - 1AD 200.00
VAN CURA ADD1T105
8-18, 1 VES UNIT
-0- S.F. 5/8 -0- -0-
84.30 S.F. 0/4 1-12 3.51 295.89
- 0- S.F. 3/W -0- -0-
50.00 OTHER 1.0 W -LINE .88 44.00
1. 027.39 [ L
1,a
101 ROBERT A BECERRA 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 9.75
858 VAN CUPA 78408
LOT 16 BLK 1
VON CURA ADDITION
RMLBA 1 RE5UNIT
487.50
- 0- 1.F.1.3.0 PVMT. -0- -0-
200.00 S.F. 5/8 1.00 200.00
-0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
75.15 S.F. 0_L120E24 3.51___263.78
-0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
51.00 OTHER LF W -LIME .88 44.00
995
SEPIE:4RER_28._1983 PAGE -24
DESCRIPTION TOTAL ,
ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT I,i(
VD. _PRDPERTY_OESCRIP.IIOY_ ASSESSED- ASSESSNE_1_-__MATE _AMOUNT _ ASSESSED_]"
102 DORIS CALHOUN 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
I857 VAN CURA 78408 -1- L.F.C.G.E PYMT. -0- -0- !,.(
_-_ LOT 15_814_1 __________ _20.0.00 S.F.__S/W ______.-100___.__200.00_ _.
VAN CURA ADDITION -0- S.F. S/4 -3- -0-
R-18. 1 RtS UNIT 75.15 S.F. 0/4 120124 3.51 263.78 (
-0- S.F. 0/n_._ _ _ .-0 __ _ _ _-0 - _
50.00 CTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
995.28 (
3 1)3 ISRAEL H GARCIA 50.30 L.F.2.0.1 PVMT. 9.75 487.50 (
-153_MAN CURA 704Q8_____.__._. -0 L.F.C.G..S_PVML___-0-_ -0-___
LOT 14 BLK 1 200.00 S.F. 5/4 1.00 200.00
VAN CORA ADDITION -0- S.F. 5/W -0- -0- ''-'(
8-1B. 1 RES UVIT 106.30 S.F. 0181-16____3.51_ ... _373.11_ ___________
' S.F. 0/4 -3- -0-
50.00 OTHER L. 6 -LINE .8844.00
1. L04.51.,
-104_MARGUEEIJF 0 0480-50.001.E.C.0._&_P3IML. 9 75 48.7..30 ..'
849 VAN ;URA 78408 -0- 1.1.5.6.1 PVMT. -D- -0-
7+ LOT 13 BLK 1 230.90 S.F. 5/0 1.00200.00 (
VAN CORA ACIITION _,L=_____S_.E..__S/n i11
R -1B. VACANT -0- 5.F. 0/d -0- -0-
i -0- S.F. D/'W -0- -0- P(
59.00_0IkiERl 1-L1NE_.8844.00 '°{
( 731.50.
104A MARGUERITE C CARR 50.00 L.F.C.0.1 PVMT. 9.75 487.50 f'
t 849 VAN CURA 78408 -0- 1.1.5.9.1 PVMT. -0- -0- 1,t-
117 12 RLK_1_ 200.00_S.F. S/n _ _ 1 00X00.00 1'
VAN CURA ADDITION -0- S.F. S/0 -0- -0-
( R-18. 1 RES UNIT 1)0.80 S.F. 0/4 1-15 3.51 353.81 (
-0- S.F. 3/4 -0- -0-
50.30 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
1,085.31
`1- 105 JULIAN G3N2ALEZ 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50 l
,41 VAN CURA__ 44.08_-2-___L.F.C.G.E_PANT. -a -Q-
LOT 11 BLK 1 200.00 S.F. 5/0 1.00 200.00 "^
L VAN CURA ADDITION * 18.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 18.00 ,-: L
_K -1B, 1 RFc_10317 __21.b5 1.F.__DLd_15DF76 3.51__321.69
-0- S.F. D/4 -0- -C-
50.00 OTHER LF 0 -LINE .88 44.00 .t...7
-1.1171.19_
*S/W EXT
,1 L
a
t
L SOPTEMBFi 28. 1383 __PAGE_95 r
DESCRIPTION T]TAL
1 ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT '(
N0. PRQPERTY DESSRLP_TIO_N_AS5E5_S1:L_ ASSESSMENTRATE _AJOUNI ASSE55E0
c
• 106 C D ROBERTS ET UX
837 VAN CURA 78408
___l9T _L0 8L9 1
VAN CURA ADDITION
{ R-13. 1 RES UNIT
(
Z , 107 'IRS BRYAN AIN60
3802 MUELLER 78408
LOT 9 BLK 1
( - VAN CURA ADDITION
8-18
i
1
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
200.00 S.F._S/4L_ _ _.___1.00__ 200.00-
-0- S.F. S/4 -0- -0-
65.65 S.F. 0/4 110E26 3.51 244.47
-0- S.F. 3/n
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
5C.00 L.F.L.G.E PVMT. 9.75
- 0- L. F.C.3. 0 PVMT.-0-_
200.00 S.F. 5/4 1.00
- 0- S.F. 5/8 -0-
75.15S.F.-D/WJ20F2 __3.51
- 0- S.F. 3/4 -3-
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88
(
(
975.97 (
487.50 (
-0-
200.00
- 0-
_
-0 28 -
_0_-
44.00
955, 28
74(
108 ROJ.ANDO C VALDEZ ET UX
829 VAN CURA 78408
LOT 3 BLK 1
VAN LURA ADDITION
8-18, 1 RES UNIT
109 VICENTE B TANGUNA
- 825 VAN CURA 78408
LOT 7 8LI 1
VAN CURA ADDITION
R-18, 1 RES UNIT
4S/W EXT
50.QQ L.F.C.0 6-EVMT. 9.75
- 0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0-
200.00 S.F. S/4 1.00
-0- S.F. 5/4 -0-
69.65 S.F. 0/9 110923 3.51
-0- S.F. 0/9 -0-
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .89
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0-
200.00 S.F. 51W_ 1 OQ
• 24.00 S.F. S/5 1.00
34.30 S.F. 0/4 1-12 3.51
- 0- S.F. DLW -0-
'( 7 110 J F CLARK
1/0 WILSON TAR BARdEi SHOP
604 N CARANC4IUA 78401
'( LOT 6 BLK 1
VAN CURA ADDITION
i P.-18. 1 RES UNIT
- 45/W EXT
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88
50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75
-0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -3-
230.00 S.F. S/4 1.00
* 18.00 S.F. 5/W 1.00
73.30 S.F. 0/n 1-10 3.51
-0- S.F. D/4 -0-
50.00 OTHER LF 8 -LINE .88
487.50
-0-
200.00
-0-
244.47
-0-
44.00
487.50
-0-
200 00
24.00
295.89
- 0-
44.00
487.50
-0-
200.00
18.00
257.18
-0-
44.00
975.97
(
C
1.00k.1
L
SEPTEMRFR 75._1181______ RAGE 26_
DESCRIPTION T3T4L
3 i• ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
_NO oROpEB_TY D.ESL$1PLIOIL___ASESSED_ __ASSESS.MEAL -_RASE 8 0UNT ASSESS
111 DAVID ALVAREZ 50.00 1.7.0.0.1 PVMT. 9.75 487.50 'I
T 817 VAN LURA 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- l�. (
_-_LDT_.S_BLIE 1 200.09 5.F S/W _1.D0 _200 00 A
VAN CORA ADDITION -D- 3.F. S/4 -0- -J-
i k -1B, 1 RES UNIT 78.80 S.F. 01.1 1-11 3.51 276.59 - (
(
-0- S.F. D/_n_-____-D -0-
50.00
._._.r0 50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
i 112 „LNZALO LISCANU 50.10 L.F.C.G.E PV4T. 9.75 487.50
__ 81L_LAN CURA 78,48 _ -07 _ L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0-
LOT 4 BL( 1 2 0.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00
_
Z VAN CURA ADDITION * 18.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 18.00
R-18. 1 RES UNSS 39.80 S.E. _ OLd_1=13 _ _3.51 .__315.20-
'S/W EXT -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
( - 50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00
1.064 70-
t
(
' 1.008.09 .. (
, 113 ELLEANIA R_G1I RRFR7 __a0 00_1.. .c. -G E PVMT.____4.75 487-90
309 VAN CURA 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- 'I
LOT 3 SLK 1 200.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 200.00 , (
v4N CUaA Ao0ILIDN_ -0- .S. E SLW -0- -0- i
R-18, 1 RES UNIT 84.30 S.F. 0/W 1-12 3.51 295.89
-0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- (
50.00 OTHER IF 4-LINE.8R 44.00 1.
1,027.39,!
(
114 RAMUNOO L GARCIA 50.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 487.50
805 VAN CUBA 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- 7 t -
I NT 7 RLI( 1 700.00_S.E._S/W_ .. 1 00 200 00
VAN CURA ADDITION * 18.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 18.00
8-18, 2 RES UNITS 73.30 S.F. D/W 1-10 3.51 257.28 i,,J (
1 *S/W EXT -0- 5.F. DLA -0- -07
50.00 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 44.00 I.{
1,006.784
J
•( , 115 SALVADOR CISNER]5 99.40 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 9.75 871.65 1 (
401 V,DLCJJ6 X78408 -- L.t.C.G.E _ PV!L. . -0- -0-
LOT 1 BL. 1 382.60 S.F. S/W 1.00 382.60
( VAN CURA ADDITION * 18.00 5.7. 5/8 1.00 18.00
a-18.1 RFC '1NIT R4.30_S.7. 0/W 1-17 3.51 799 R9
35/8 EXT -0- S.F. 0/8 -0- -0-
89.40 OTHER LF W -LINE .88 78.67
(
` I
C
(
SLP T E'18FR1 d. 1981 PAGE -2L_
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
r'. ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT C
VD.__ PROPERTY DESC$fPi1CK__ _ ASSESSED__ ASSESSMENT____RAT.E_ A IJNT ASSESSEJ
( ELOISE DRIVE
(
116 d L GUESS 111 ET Ud w 270.41 L.F.C.S.E PVMT. 12.35 3,339.56
C AJ VALOREM -7- L.F.C.G.E PVNT. -0- -0-
P7 P7X 7247 78415 1,3i2.72 S.F. S/w 1.00 1,352.02
LOT 13 LESS V 10 FT -0- S.F. S/W -3-
( ELLENOALE GIRJENS 10 2 -0- S.F. 0/8 -0- -0-
I-L_-0-S.F.D/4 _ _ -0- -0-
*CR 19 LF, 97 1MPTS 290.41 OTHER LF W -LINE 1.06 307.d3
4.999.41 (
OMAHA DRIVE
END VAN LURA/ELDISE
ENO EAST SIDE
LANTANA STREET
I.H. 37 TO ST THERESAS SCHOOL
NORTH SIDE ONLY
(
(
3EGIN STATION 01.57
__L17 BENEOlc_LIe_FATHERS -0- 2 F.C.G.E_PQHT._=0- -0-
OF CORPUS CHRISTI -0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT. -0- -0-
( BISHOP REVS H 0940106 7,156.00 S.F. S/w 1.30 7,156.00
627 LIPA5_ 78401 9 120.30 S.F. S/5 1.00 120400
LOT 1, BENEDICTINE AC -0- S.F. 0/4 -D-
I *2 S/W EXTS -0- S.F. 0/4 -0- -0-
7.276.00
I
A 117A SAINT THERESAS CHURCH -C- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -3- -0-
0/0 BISHOP REVE H GRACIDA -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0-
t , 620 LIPAV 78401 1,896.50 S.F. 5/W 1.00 1,896.50 L
LOT 1. LANTANA ACRES -0- S.F. S/W -0-
-0- S.F. O/d -0- -0-
-7- S.F. D/9 -0- -0- t
1,896.50
(
(
(
(
L
L
L
( (
StPTFNRFR 78,,J9&3 SAGE jg_
DESCRIPTION TJTAL
( ITEM OWNER AND QUANTITY OF AMOUNT I;I(
ND. _PR2PERTY DFSrRLLTIDN ASSES.SEL__A.SSESSMENT RATE_ AMOUNT - ASSES -SED__,
STATION 26+92
( END LANTANA STREET
END SIDELALI<_
t
END PRD,LECL-_
( r
( TOTAL ASSESSMENTS *9* 192,377.68
C
iC
C
(r
C
• •
SECTION 4. Be it further ordained that in the event the actual
frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion
of said improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet
hereinabove stated, the assessments herein set against any such property and
against the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be, and the same are
hereby declared to be increased or decreased as the case may be, in the
proportion which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall bear to the
whole number of front feet of property actually improved in accordance with
the front foot rule or rate of assessment herein adopted, it being the
intention that such parcel of property and the real and true owner or owners
thereof abutting on the portion of the streets above described, within the
limits defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT FOOT RULE OR
PLAN", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and
equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view the special
benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further
ordained that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on
the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined all certificates hereinafter
provided for, issued to evidence said assessments against said parcels of
property abutting upon said street, and the real and true owner or owners
thereof shall be issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual
frontage of said property and the actual cost of said improvements, the
amount named in said certificate in no case to exceed the amount herein
assessed against such property unless such increase be caused by an excess of
front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost and such
actual number of front feet, if different from the hereinabove shown in
Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the City Engineer upon completion of
said work on said street, and the findings of the City Engineer shall be
final and binding upon all parties concerned.
SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3
hereof assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the aforesaid
streets, within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof,
whether named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of
Section 4 thereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight
percent (8%) per annum with reasonable attorney's fee and all costs and
expenses of collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a first
• •
and prior lien upon the respective parcels of property, against which same
are assessed from and after the date said improvements were ordered by said
City Council, to -wit: August 3, 1983, and a personal liability and charge
against the real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein,
and that said lien shall be and constitute the first and prior enforceable
claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and paramount lien
superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem
taxes; and that the same so assessed shall be paid and become payable in one
of the following methods at the option of the property owner:
1. All in cash within 30 days after completion or
acceptance by City; or
2. Payments to be made in maximum of 120 equal
installments, the first of which shall be paid within 30
days after the completion of said improvement, and the
acceptance thereof by the City, and the balance to be
paid in 59 equal consecutive monthly installments
commencing on the 1st day of the next succeeding month
until the entire sum is paid in full, together with
interest from the date of said completion and acceptance
by the City, until paid, at the rate of eight percent
(8%) per annum; provided, however, that the owners of
said property availing themselves of Option "2" or "3"
above shall have the privilege of paying one, or all, of
such installments at any time before maturity thereof by
paying the total amount of principal due, together with
interest accrued, to the date of payment.
3. The total number of monthly installments on owner
occupied property may be extended beyond 120 in number so
that, at the owner's request, the total monthly payments
will not exceed ten ($10.00) per month.
SECTION 6. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments,
the liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said
parcels or property and the real and true owner or owners thereof and the
time and terms of payment, and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable
certificates shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to itself
upon the completion of said improvements in said streets and acceptance
thereof by said City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the
Mayor in the name of the City, attested by the City Secretary, with the
corporate seal of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts
of said assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest
thereon, the date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements for
which the certificate is issued, and shall contain the names of the apparent
true owner or owners as accurately as possible, and the description of the
property assessed by lot and block number, or front foot thereof, or such
• •
other description as may otherwise identify the same, and if the said
property shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so state the fact shall
be sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such property or in
giving the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise
invalidate or impair the assessment levied hereby or the certificate issued
in evidence thereof.
That said certificate shall further provide substantially that if
default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or
interest when due, then at the option of the City, its successors, or
assigns, or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidence thereby
shall at once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with
reasonable attorney's fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if
incurred, and said certificate shall set forth and evidence the personal
liability of the real and true owner or owners of such property, and that
said lien is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles
and charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said
improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit: August 3, 1983, and
shall provide in effect that if default shall be made in the payment thereof,
the same may be enforced, at the option of the City, or their successors and
assigns, by the sale of the property therein described in the manner provided
for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above recited, or by suit in any
court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all the
proceedings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly
had in compliance with the law and Charter in force in said City and the
proceedings of said City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites to
the fixing of the assessment lien against the property therein described, or
attempted to be described, and the personal liability of the real and true
owner or owners thereof, evidence by such certificates, have been regularly
done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the matters and
facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be required in any court.
That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, in
the enforcement and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain
other and further recitals, pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall not
•
be necessary that said certificates shall be in the exact form as above set
forth, but the substance and effect thereof shall suffice.
SECTION 7. That all such assessments levied are a personal
liability and charge against the real and true owner or owners of the
property described, or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner
or owners may not be named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the
name of the property owner, or the description of any property or the amount
of any assessment, or in any other matter or thing shall not in anywise
invalidate or impair any assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued,
and such mistake, or error, invalidity or irregularity whether in such
assessment or in the certificate issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is
not required to be, to be enforceable, at any time corrected by the said City
Council of the City of Corpus Christi. Further that the omission of said
improvements in front of any part of parcel of property abutting upon the
aforementioned streets, which is exempt from the lien of said assessment,
shall in no wise affect or impair the validity of assessments against the
other parcels of property abutting upon said street; and that the total
amounts assessed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon
said streets within the limits herein defined and the real and true owner or
owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the estimate of said
assessment prepared by the City Engineer and approved and adopted by the City
Council and are in accordance with the procedures of said City Council
relative to said improvements and assessments thereof, and with the terms,
powers and provisions of said Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called
Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known as Article 1105b
of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas and Charter of the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, under which terms, power and provisions said
proceedings, said improvements and assessments were had and made by said City
Council.
SECTION 8. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council
members, copy attached, to find and declare an emergency due to the need for
efficient administration of City affairs by the closing of such hearing on
public street improvements, such finding of an emergency is made and declared
requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon
ordinances or resolutions at three regular meetings so that this ordinance is
passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this
the 28th day of September, 1983.
ATTEST:
C ty ecretary MAYOR
THE CI OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
APP VED:
DAY OF, 19113
. BRUCE AYCOCK,000CITY ATTTTORNEY
•
•
Corpus Christi,
(Texas
�0Jday of C+—.t,1Q"R , 198.
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance
or resolution, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule
as to consideration and voting upon ordinances or resolutions at three
regular meetings; I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule
and pass this ordinance or resolution finally on the date it is introduced,
or at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Council Members
The above ordinance was
Luther Jones
Betty N. Turner
David Berlanga, Sr.
Leo Guerrero
Herbert L. Hawkins, Jr.
Dr. Charles W. Kennedy
Joe McComb
Frank Mendez
Mary Pat Slavik
Respectfully,
MAYOR
THE CI OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
passed by the
following vote:
1"1369
•