Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17951 ORD - 12/01/1983AN ORDINANCE CLOSING THE HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREETS: Baldwin Boulevard, (M.H. 408), from Agnes Street to Leopard Street; FIXING A LIEN AND CHARGE, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted ordinance passed and approved on the 12th day of October, 1983, determined the necessity for, and ordered the improvement of the following streets: Baldwin Boulevard, (M.H. 408), from Agnes Street to Leopard Street; in the manner and according to the plans and specifications heretofore approved and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated October 12, 1983, a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of the said City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the City Engineer to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the property abutting upon a portion of the aforesaid streets within the limits herein defined, to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City Engineer has heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of other matters relating thereto with said City Council, and same has been received, examined and approved by said City Council; and WHEREAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated October 12, 1983, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on the above named streets, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and by ordinance dated October 12, 1983, did order and set a hearing to be held at 3:00 p.m. on the 9th day of November, 1983, in the City Council Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property abutting upon said streets, within the limits above defined, and for all others owning or claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property, or any of said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against each parcel of abutting property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and as to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error, invalidity, irregularity or deficiency in any proceedings, or contract, to appear and be heard in person or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said matters; and the City Council did by said ordinance order and direct the City to give notice of said hearing to the owners abutting upon said streets as shown by the current ad valorem tax roll by mailing such notice 17951 MJCROFILME@ SEP 2 R 1984 to such owners and publishing said notice at least three times in the Corpus Christi Times before the date of the hearing, such notice of mail and by publication being in compliance with the provisions of Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and WHEREAS, such notice was given said owners of property as shown on the current ad valorem tax roll within the limits of the streets being improved by mailing such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing to such owners and by publishing three times notice of such hearing in the Corpus Christi Times, the first of which publication was at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date of said hearing; both forms of notice being in compliance with and containing the information required by Article 11056, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes; and WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing of which notice was given, was opened and held on November 9, 1983, in the City Council Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all said abovementioned persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents and attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following appeared and offered the following testimony: • r Council Meeting oeN, Ae 9, 1983 Page 15 award will produce $240,000 m therefore, the Staff is res2pmending Bank - Corpus Christi w. h is in the this contract wil for the balance ed to the Co�nc1 that the bids the City e err competitive and the recommended oryRn 1... t had been received previously; that the-awa! be made to Texas Commerce best interest of\the City. He noted that of this Council's term ofo` ice. City Manager Martin exp received under this bidding format otion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the foregoing roved, seconded by Council Member Berlanga and passed unanimously. Mayor Jones announced the public hearing on the following item: 26. 3:00 p.m. - Assessment hearing on the Baldwin Boulevard reconstruction project from Agnes to Leopard Street. The roll provides for assessments of $322,974.96 on 43 items. Assistant City Manager Lontos- explained that this project is for improvements to Baldwin Boulevard which was included in the 1977 Bond Program. He explained that it is under the Urban Systems Program and the City will pay for the drainage, right-of-way, utility adjustments and concrete street work. He pointed out that itis not a Voluntary Paving Program but it is necessary and was placed in the Bond Election as a major thoroughfare. City Attorney Bruce Aycock explained that this public hearing-is='required by State Law and the purpose is to provide testimony to enable the Council to make a decision as to whether or not the assessments charged are equal in value to the improvements. He called as his first witness Mr. Gerald Smith, City Engineer. Through questioning of Mr. Smith, Mr. Aycock ascertained that he was properly qualified and had been with the City for 24 years. He noted that a copy of his qualifications in resume form is on file in a City office. He inquired of Mr. Smith if cost estimates have been made on this project. Mr. Smith testified that they have been made by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. He explained that this project is to improve Baldwin Boulevard from Agnes Street to Leopard Street and this is one of the last remaining streets to be reconstructed under the 1977 Bond Program and that it is partially funded through the Urban Systems Program. He informed the Council that the State designed the project in cooperation with the City Staff and bids were received by the State Office. . Mr. Smith explained that the proposal is to widen Baldwin Boulevard to 62 feet from back of curb. He noted that there will be two moving lanes of traffic in each direction; parking is not contemplated on this street; additional storm sewers will be installed; and sidewalks are proposed to be installed. He stated that the low bidder was Wright Way Construction Company and the bid price was k _ s Regular Council Meeting November 9, 1983 ' Page 16 $1,323,985.70. He stated that the existing right-of-way is 120 feet wide and the improvements will include a standard 6" curb and gutter section, 8" stabilized subgrade, 10" thick flexible base, 5 3/4" asphalt stabilized base and of Type D Hot Mix Asphaltic Pavement. He pointed out that 4 -foot wide reinforced concrete sidewalks will be constructed 11 feet from the back of the curb and that 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways will be constructed. Mr. Smith listed the bid price and assessment rates as follows: Curb, Gutter and Pavement - Bid Price, $60.16 per linear foot, Assessment Rate - $19.50 per linear foot; Sidewalk - $1.40 per square foot, Assessment Rate - $1.00 per square foot; Driveways - $2.82 per square foot, Assessment Rate - $2.82 per square foot. He stated that the commercial rate will apply because there are no residential properties on this street. Mr. Smith continued his explanation by stating that the City proposes to construct the sidewalks 11 feet from the street to allow for parking by the abutting property owners and 98 feet of the right-of-way will be used; but 22 feet would be available for parking purposes by those owners. He stated that the assessment roll had been computed according to the existing Assessment Ordinance and the total assessment price is $323,179.41. He pointed out that the assessments may be paid in cash at the completion of the project; they may be paid over a five-year period in monthly installments at an interest rate of 8% or in case of a hardship, this period may be extended to two years. He stated that the contract has been awarded by the State and the contractor has started preliminary work.' He assured the Council that access will-be=provided to all of the property during construction and the project will require approximately 9 months of construction time. Mr. Smith stated that during the public hearing conducted by the State and the City Staff, many of the property owners indicated that they were looking forward to the improvement project but they saw no reason for the construction of sidewalks and in.fact, the City had received a petition from all of the property owners requesting that the sidewalks not be installed. Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she would have to concur that sidewalks are not needed in this industrial area. She noted that this is not a voluntary project. Mr. Smith explained that even though there is 120 feet of right-of-way, the Staff is not recommending that all of that be used but that 11 feet of it be used for parking by the property owners. He explained that many of the property owners have been using the public right-of-way for parking for many years. He agreed that the question of sidewalks in industrial areas has been discussed before and that the Platting Ordinance has been amended in regard to sidewalks in interior areas of industrial subdivisions but at the time that amendment was made, the Council placed three conditions on which sidewalks must be constructed even in industrial areas and Baldwin Boulevard meets two of those three conditions in that it is a collector street and is on the perimeter of an industrial area. He explained that the right-of-way is difficult to define because there are no sidewalks and people have a tendency to indiscriminantly tes vu {lar Council Meeting November 9, 1983 Page 17 park in the right-of-way at this time. He pointed out that the addition of sidewalks and curbs would eliminate that practice. He expressed the opinion that header curbs would be required if the sidewalks are not constructed and the property owner would be assessed for the header curbs in lieu of sidewalks. Mr. Smith continued his explanation by noting that some of the streets being improved in the Baldwin/Leopard project extend on to Baldwin Boulevard and the construction of sidewalks on this street would tie both projects together., City Attorney Aycock called as his first witness Mr. W. J. Holly and established that he is a Licensed Real Estate Broker qualified to testify in this hearing. He noted that Mr. Holly's qualifications in resume form are on file in the City office. Mr. Holly testified that he is familiar with each and every parcel of land included in this project and that in his opinion, all of the property will be enhanced at least in the amount of each individual assessment. Mr. Holly then read his notes recording his observations regarding the necessity for sidewalks, indicating that in his opinion, some of the businesses are relatively close and it is possible that walk-in customers might use the sidewalk between the buildings. Mr. Holly also testified that the need for improved streets, curbs and gutters is very evident and the drainage will be improved_as well. Council Member Kennedy inquired if the City had ever considered installing sidewalks on one side of the street only, and Mr. .Smith replied that they considered this when Airline Road between Ocean Drive and Williams was improved. He explained that the reason it was considered was because Seaside Cemetery • sides on Airline and the Staff considered the possibility of not installing sidewalks alongside their property, however later the decision was made to install the sidewalks and they are used extensively by pedestrians and joggers. Speaking in opposition to the requirement for sidewalks was Mr. Louis Holder, representing Moreman Tire Company which is in the 4500 block of Baldwin. He stated that he had submitted a petition signed by 100% of the property owners objecting to the sidewalks. He stated that they looked forward to the street improvements but they could not see any need for sidewalks and felt that actually, they would be a detriment. He pointed out that even if they are allowed to use 11 feet of right-of-way for parking, his company would still have a parking problem. Council Member Kennedy inquired if his building met the code requirements for off-street parking, and Mr. Holder replied that he did not know since it was constructed 25 years ago. Mr. Tom Stewart, Director of Transportation, confirmed that this street would be no different from the situation on Everhart, Airline, etc. which do not have on -street parking either. . ces Regular Council Meeting November 9, 1983 Page 18 Mr. Holder also expressed the opinion that when customers park in front of their businesses, they will have a tendency to park on the sidewalk and it will soon be destroyed anyway. Council Member McComb inquired of Mr. Holder if the property owners would be willing to install bumpers to keep the cars from parking on the curb, and Mr. Holder stated that he felt that they would be willing to do that. Mr. Smith pointed out that header curbs are almost the same thing that Mr. McComb mentioned and he felt that they need something to define the right-of-way. He pointed out that if that curb is constructed, it will be assessed against the property owner and will cost $7 to $8 per linear foot and would be twice the cost of a sidewalk. Mr. Smith reiterated that if something is not done to define the right-of-way, the result will be indiscriminate use of the right-of-way. Mayor Pro Tem Turner expressed the opinion that sidewalks would have some negative effect on these property owners. Mr. Lontos stated that what the Staff is trying to tell the Council is that they feel when you have a major street such as Baldwin, a number of things have to go into the improvements; it is necessary when parking space is not available that something should be provided for the people to walk on who -are doing business in the area; and the Staff feels that the sidewalks are essential to the people who are conducting business in the area. He pointed out that there is also a residential subdivision very near here. Mayor Pro Tem Turner pointed out that there have been no sidewalks located there for twenty years nor have there been any requests for sidewalks. Mr. Lontos reiterated that the Staff must tell the Council what the policy is and that is what the Staff must make a recommendation on in terms of the street itself. He stated that the Staff feels that it is needed even though at the present time there may not be an evident need for sidewalks, this situation could change in the future and they could be needed. He pointed out that they are just following the Council's policy in that on major thoroughfares, sidewalks are always constructed and if they are not constructed on this street, a precedent will be established. Council Member Kennedy inquired if the major problem was the amount of money that it would cost the property owners or the number of feet that will be lost. Mr. Holder stated that they are concerned about the space that they will lose. - Regular Council Meeting, November 9, 1963 Page 19 Also speaking in opposition to the construction of the sidewalk was Mr. Frank Wiggins of Ray West Warehouse. He pointed out that 100% of the property owners expressed opposition to the installation of sidewalks. He agreed that they have been using the City right-of-way but he still felt there is no reason for sidewalks on a major arterial street, pointing out that there are none on Leopard or Agnes Streets. He assured the Council that there are never any school children walking on this street and if sidewalks are constructed, they will experience difficulty with trucks attempting to turn around. Also speaking in opposition was. Mr. Hy Goodman, representing Century Papers, who stated that they own 850 feet on Baldwin and Agnes and in his opinion, there is no reason ever for anyone to walk on that. street. He explained the increased size of the trucks that serve his company now and that sidewalks would further hamper their ability to move trucks in and out. He stated that he sees no reason for header curbs either. Also speaking in opposition to the installation of sidewalks was Mr. Malcolm F. Sterett, representing Sterrett Supply Company at 4533 Baldwin; Mr. Henry McDowell, representing Flato Supply Company; Mr. Ray Johnson, representing Future Securities, who explained that he is involved in leasing rental property which is an industrial strip center. He pointed out that they already have a sidewalk to connect their different businesses and there is no need for an additional—sidewalk because that would eliminate the possibility of head -in parking in the front of the businesses. He admitted that they are using 20 to 30 feet of City right-of-way but it is not being utilized for parking but for automobiles entering the areas of the buildings. Council Member Slavik stated that she had noted that some of the owners had indicated that they would be willing to install sidewalks in the future if they ever became necessary for a walk-in type of business. Mr. Smith stated that if the Council determined that there was a necessity for it in the future, there would be an option to install them then. A motion was made by Council Member McComb that the hearing be closed, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed unanimously. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the sidewalks included in the plan be deleted from the improvements with no provision for header curbs; seconded by Council Member Mendez. Council Member Kennedy stated that he was apprehensive about deleting the sidewalks and referred to Nottarb Place, which is known as "WOW", and stated that he had observed cars parked in different of ways out there including on the curb, etc. He stated that for this reason, he felt there was some necessity for the sidewalks. He agreed that the plans as they exist now do take more space from the property owners than is necessary and he would be in favor of moving the sidewalk to within one foot of the curb which would result in a lesser loss of property to the property owners. Minutes Regular Council Meeting' November 9, 1983 Page 20 Mayor Jones summarized that the Staff has presented a paving project on the basis of the City's existing policies. He also noted the fact that so much of the land on each side is being used by the property owners and the proposed action in effect takes back City land that the property owners have been using. He stated that he, too, had a problem with the motion. He pointed out that the proposed action amends the City ordinance and if these sidewalks are eliminated, a precedent may be established. Mr. Smith agreed that the sidewalk as it exists in the Plans is to be constructed 14 feet from the curb, and as an option, they could move the sidewalk adjacent to the curb. City Manager Martin noted that one of the things before the Council is whether it is the loss of property or the necessity for the sidewalks that is at issue. He stated that if it is a loss of property, Mr. Smith has just mentioned the possibility of moving the sidewalk adjacent to the curb. Mr. Martin expressed the opinion that it is important to have the sidewalk installed and that option might be more acceptable to the property owners if they are in fact saying that the loss of property is their real concern. Mr. McComb noted that there will be a loss of property due to the fact that the street will be widened and if trucks go over the sidewalks, they will be damaged. -� Mr. Smith pointed out that if the sidewalks are moved closer to the street, the cost of the driveways would be substantially reduced. He also noted that if the plans are changed, it may be necessary for the City Staff to renegotiate with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. Mr. McComb suggested that this matter be tabled until the Staff has an opportunity to discuss this with the State. Council Member Berlanga inquired about the necessity for 5 -foot sidewalks, and Mr. Smith replied that the standard City policy is to have 4 -foot wide sidewalks if they are away from the curb but if they are immediately adjacent to the curb, they are usually 5 feet wide. Mayor Pro Tem Turner amended her original motion to construct 4 -foot wide sidewalks immediately adjacent to the curb, seconded by Council Member Berlanga. Council Member McComb asked about the impact that would have on the entire City if the width of the sidewalks is changed to 4 -foot wide when the ordinance requires 5 feet. Mayor Pro Tem Turner then amended her motion as previously amended to specify 5 -foot wide sidewalks flush with the curb, seconded by Council Member Berlanga. This motion passed unanimously by those present and voting. eg ar Council Meeting November 9, 1963 Page 21 Mr. Smith informed the Council that the assessment roll will have to be revised and they hope to have the ordinance on the agenda next week or the following week. * Mayor Jones announced the public hearing on the following item 27. :15 p.m. - Closing and abandonment of Iris and Eklund Avenues om the Clarkwood drainage channel to Commerce Street including two alley- in Block 6 ah 7 in the Clarkwood Subdivision. None of the streets o alleys are open a this time. Assistant ity Manager Lontos located the streets on a transparency and stated that the p oposal is to close the streets which dead- d at the Clarkwood drainage ditch. H stated that they also propose to cl•.e two alleys in the same area. He assu d the Council that the Staff ha no objections to the closing of the streets nd alleys if proper drainage •nd utility easements are retained. He stated tha\ here will be no adverse e ect on the traffic in the area. Mayor Jones ascertained th•• no one wishes to speak in opposition to these street closings. A motion was made by Mayor P T- Turner that the hearing be closed, seconded by Council Member Berlanga a passed unanimously. A motion was made by Mayor : o Te Turner that the streets and alleys listed be closed, seconded by Council Membe Berlanga and passed unanimously. City Secretary Read pol -d the Council fo their votes and the following ordinance was passed: 27. ORDINANCE NO. 1793 CLOSING AND AB=•`DONING IRIS AVENUE FROM COMMERCE ST T TO A POINT 285 FEET EAST, EKLUND •VENUE FROM COMMERCE STREET TO A POINT 2a, FEET EAST, THE 20 FOOT WIDE LEYS IN BLOCKS 6 AND 7, CLARKWOOD SUBDI+.SIGN; SUBJECT TO PROVISIO LISTED BELOW; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The a arter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance •=ssed by the fo owing vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Kennedy, McComb, -ndez and avik voting, "Aye"; Guerrero and Hawkins, "absent". There being no further testimony offered or any further parties appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and WHEREAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony being offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of said abutting property as compared to cost of the improvements of said portion of said streets proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities, in the proceeding or contract heretofore had in reference to the portions of said streets to be improved; and WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said improvements on said streets within the limits above defined, and has heard all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all protests and objections relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities in any of the proceedings and contract for said improvements, and has given a full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to make any such protest, objection or offer testimony and has fully examined and considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests offered and based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said City Council finds that each and every parcel of property abutting upon the portion of the streets aforesaid within the limits to be improved as herein defined, will be enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construction of said improvements upon the said streets upon which said improvements proposed to be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said parcel of abutting property, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City Council did consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiences called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had, and the proceedings of said City Council heretofore had with reference to such improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments hereinbelow made and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property on the portions of the streets hereinabove described, within the limits defined, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable and did adopt the rule of apportionment set out below and the division of the cost of said improvements between said abutting properties, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable, and as producing substantial equality considering the benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby, and that all objections and protests should be overruled and denied except the corrections and changes as appear on the final assessment roll included in this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for or against said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners of abutting property on said streets, within the limits above defined, and to all persons, firms, corporations and estates, owning or claiming same or any interest therein, be and the same is hereby closed and all protests and objections, whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are hereby overruled and denied. SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon the evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel or property abutting upon the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined, that the special benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, by virtue to the construction of said improvements to said portion of said streets upon which said property abuts, will be in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements as proposed to be, and as herein assessed against said abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of the cost of said improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow made are just and equitable and produce substantial equality considering the benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and the Charter provisions of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore had with reference to said improvements are in all respects regular, proper and valid, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens against said abutting properties, as hereinabove described and the personal liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or not, have been in all things regularly had and performed in compliance with the law, Charter provisions and proceedings of the said City Council. SECTION 3. That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted by said City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of the above described street, within the limits defined, and in pursuance of said proceedings heretofore had and enacted by said City Council, in reference to said improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to said street improvements by the laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, there shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective parcels or property abutting upon said portion of said streets, and against the real and true owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein or not, the several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels of said property, the number of front feet of each and the several amounts assessed against same and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and names of the apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted by said City Council, being as follows, to -wit: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL BALDWIN BOULEVARD (M.H. 408) FROM AGNES STREET TO LEOPARD STREET This project shall include improvements to Baldwin Boulevard within the limits described and provides for excavation to a width and depth to permit the constr- uction of a 62 foot wide street (back of the curb) within the existing 120 foot wide right-of-way. The improvements include a standard 6" curb and gutter section, 8" thick stabilized subgrade, 10" thick flexible base (caliche), 5 3/4" asphalt stablized base, and 1 1/4" of Type "D" Hot Mix asphaltic pavement. There will be 5' wide reinforced concrete sidewalks constructed tied to the back of the curb and 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways as shown on the plans. This project is being constructed by the City and the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and is an improvement assessment project. Based on the low bid submitted by Wright Way Construction Company and the City's current assessment policy, abutting property owners are assessed at the following rates: Bid Price Assessment Rate Curb, Gutter & Pavement $60.16 L.F. $19.50 L.F. Sidewalk $ 1.40 S.F. $ 1.00 S.F. Driveways _ $ 2.82 S.F. $ 2.82 S.F. There is no residential property, churches or schools along the street section being constructed. Total Bid Price State & Federal Portion Final Assessments * City Share * Includes City utilities adjustments. $1,323,985.70 $1,045,603.20 $ 320,084.04 $ 299,382.50 Gerald Smith, P.E. City Engineer GS/dl 1 2 6 e N 3 o NOVEMBER 30, 1983 nFSf RTPTTn PAGE 1 • • L ITEM NO. OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT AMOUNT'. ASSESSED FZNR ACCFCCMFNT Rnl1 BAL'OWIN BOULEVARD • AYERS ST TO LEOPARD ST BEGIN WEST SIDE All S/W 5' WTDF F TIFn Tn CIIRR 1 CnRTFX TNVFCTMFNT Cn R57-81 L.F.C.6.E PVMT. 19-50 .6,629,.$0 C/0 HY GOODMAN -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- -0- P.O. BOX 4353 78469 3,874.67 S.F. S/W 1.00 3,874.67 IOTC 1,2, F,, 3 RIK 7 -R- C F S/W -n- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 I-3/I-2,CENTURY PAPER 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C • -2.82 1,454.95 - 23 '245.: 7 (1111 F SIIPP( Y Cn TN( 2A0 -n0 L F C G.F PVM.T- 14 50 5,070 00 C/O CLARK -E COMPANY -0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. -0- -0- 2510 TIMES BLVD 1,092.81 S.F. S/W 1.00. 1,092.8.1 HRUSTnN, TX 77nn5 -0- S.F- S/ -n- -0 1.558 AC OF LOT 19, BLK 19 -W 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 RUSSELL FARM BLK -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- L.2_,. 6111 F CIIPPI Y 7,617. 3 LONE STAR CO 120.00 L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. 19.50 2,340.00 C/O JOHN G MEADOWS -0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. -0- -0- R n x 75 2E, 5 417-81 S_ F_ S j4 . 1,,.0,0 417_,-8-1. DALLAS, TX 75265 -0- S.F. S/W -0- ,-0- LOT 5 BLK 7 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 RIISSFI I FARM_B.0 -0- S..F- Q/W -0- -0- I-2, LONE STAR CO 4,043. • 4 HENSLEY K BALEY 6 120.00 L.F.C•G.6 PVMT. 19.50_ 2,340.00 N(1RMAN R (I ASSON -n- I _F-C-r_F cVMT_, -0- -0- PO BOX 9576 78408 417.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 417.81 120 FT X 210 FT, .689 AC- -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- RIK 19 •.0 - • - • • 7.5 I-2, HOSE OF SO TX & -0- S.F. D/W -0- _ -0- CAPITAL BEARING CO o NOVEMBER 30; 1983 DFSCRIPTION PAGE 2 Tf1TAl ■ ITEM N0. OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY - OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE , AMOUNT AMOUNT ASSESSED, 5 LEE LANPHIFR ET UX 230_13 L.F C C,, f PVMT 19.50 4,407.54 PO BOX 4961 78408 LOT 7 BLK 7 RUSSELL JNDUSTRIAL ARFA -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. - 968.46 S.F. S/W -0- S.F. S/W -0- 1.00 -0- -0- • 968.46 u -0- I-2, THRIFT CARPET 455.94 S.F. 0/W 1-30C -0- S.F. D/W 2.82 -0- 1,285.75 -0- t. e 6, VIIJA DRTVE INTFR5FCTIUk.- _ 6 P K HRTSSTKOPOIIIUS FT Al 700 00 1 _F.f G E PVMT_ 19_50 3,900 It 4456 SO STAPLES 78411 -0- 'L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 14 BLK 8 792.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 792.81 RU,.SELJ_ INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S.F. S/W ' -.- -1- I-2, VALLEY PUMP, INC 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 . -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- 0 7 I M C.FRSMAN ET AL 150:00 L F.C.,G.&_ 1940 7,975 Q0 C/O PROPERTY TX SVC CO .VMT -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- = PO BOX 8808 78412 542.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 542.81 = 1 flT 13 RI K 0 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL AREA 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 I-2, MOREMAN TIRE CO --0- S.F. D/W -0- .-0- . 8 MAI Cr1I M F STERETT 190.00 I .F.C_C.6 PVMT. 19 50 ,------........-44 7,975-00 ° 4533 BALDWIN 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 8 BLK 88 (LUSS L TND 1STRTAI AREA 482.81 S.F. S/W • • -0- S.E_._.S/ 1.00 -0- 482.81 • -0.- 0- I-2, STERETT SUPPLY CO 1-2, 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 239.94 S.F. D/W 1-12C 2.82 676.63 5 - • ■ 9 WAL e SU' • 1 I el • t E.T. G.& PVM.T.. 19 50 7,_a0.0...00 ■ C/O G.S. BAHR -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- o BOX 4876 78469 1,585.62 S.F. S/W 1.00 1,585.62 1 n 6 RI K 8 -0- S F. S/W -0- - - = RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL AREA 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 I-1, WALLACE SUPPLY 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C. 2.82 1,454.95 17,29 • . NOVEMBER 30, 1983 RFSCRTPTTIIN PAGE 3 ._ -TfTAL -0 AMOUNT ASSESSED ITEM NO. OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT In WTILTAMSnN T HOUGH 377_71 1 F C.G S PVMT lq SO 7,365-35 C/O JACK MILLER -0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT. -0- 4:1- PO BOX 7427 78415 1,888.55 S.F. S/W 1.00 1,888.55 1 IlT 4 RI K R -(1- S _F_ S/W -0- - -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- I-2 -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- 9,253_ 11 WFST AMnFRSON,.._I11 1n011n LF C GE-..P_Wd- PO BOX 5202 78405 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 3 BLK 8 317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 317.81 RiISSFI1 TNMISTRTAI nT.ST -(1- SJ S/W -0- -0- I-2, ANDERSON WEST 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- 12 J111-IN M ANfFRSfN 110-00 L-F-C-G-& PVIAT- 19-50 2 - ■■ 125 LAKESHORE 78413 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0-- LOT 2 BLK 8 542.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 542.81 RIISCFI I 114111 S.TAIALD.IST -0=.SF S/ -■- -■- I-2, D.I.A. DRILLING 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- 0- .14,922-.-- 42.3.-13 11 NORMA IFF MTffAP 211_33 F fG_ Z.,..RVh1.T- 19-50 4-,.39, 94 13101 PRESTON RD, SUITE 210 * 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- DALLAS, TX 75240 1,084.46 S.F. S/W 1.00 1,084.46 LnT 1 RIK R -0- S F S/W -0- - -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST 455.94-S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 I-2, MIDCAP BEARING #RTN DMA_HA -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- , _(1B 7,310. OMAHA DRIVE INTERSECTION -` 14 ARMCO STEEL CORP 165.70 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 3,231.15 1455 WEST LOOP SOUTH * 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 975.00 H(111STnN, TX 77(127 646...11 S-F f/W 1-00--------646,S1 LOT14 BLK 6 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- NAVIGATION INDUSTRIAL PARK * 320.00 S.F. D/W 1-30C_ 2.82 902.40 - ■ '4 S-F_ D/-W-1=30G 1,285-4-5 *RTN ON OMAHA -2-.82 7,040.1 = ' NOVEMBER 30, 1983 DFSCRIPTION PAGE 4 TOTAL ITEM . ' NO. OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ' OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT AMOUNT ASSESSED ° 15 CRAWFORD & HALL 150.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 2,975.00 4721 BALDWIN 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- + NUECES COFFEE CO TR 542.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 542.81 = 150 FT X 250 FT S OF BQLDWIN -0- S,U- 0- W OF OMAHA, BLK 119 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 ° RUSSELL FARM TR -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- ' I-2. MEMBRANF SFRVIGF ° 4,922. 7 18 16 ZELMA KINS 410.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 7,995.00 PO BOX 9132 78408 * 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 975.00 '+ LOTS 1, 2. 3 & 4 BLK 6 1,635.62 S.F. S/W 1.40 1.635.E NAVIGATION INDUSTRIAL PARK -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- 1-2 COOR DISTRIBUTOR 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C ' 2.82 - 1,454.95 u *RTN ON CANT ELL DR W 515.94 S.E...•-D/1_35C ?.R7 5 ° .3,•54..35 13,515. , CANTWELL INTERSECTION a 17 RAY WEST WAREHOUSE, INC 683.22 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 13,322.79 u PETER 8 ANDERSON VI PRES * 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 975.00 PO ROX 456 78403 2.694.95 C F S/W_ 1.00 7,F,94._95 a LOT 1 BLK 1 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- . NAVIGATION'INDUSTRIAL PARK 635.94 S.F. D/W 1-45C 2.82 1,793.35 b I-?. WFST 6 CATNS,.,1rLA8EJ:U1•UCF 615.94 S.E.,_DL1 1,-. 7.R7 1,793.35 *RTN CANTWELL DR 515.94 OTHER LF 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 22,034. a• '> 17A RAY WEST PROPERTIES LTD 243.70 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50, 4,752.15 LTD PARTNERS.HIE, -D- 1 .,E..C..-G•.F. PVAL. -1- - -41- „ PO BOX 456 78403 829.12 S.F. S/W 1.00 829.12 N .73 AC OF LOT 4 BLK 1 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- La _ t. Lt, 1 . - t .87 1,285..25 . I-2, CME & L.G.R.INC 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 . 1,454.95 8,321. . 19 18 ESCO SUPPLY CO 202.24 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 3,943.68 , UN IO _ BZ W t ' -t- ' 0 -i- t- = PO BOX 1078 • 804.01 S.F. S/W 1.00 804.01_ SAN ANTONIO, TX 78294 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- '9 1 DTC 6 F._7 R_L_K 1 515_94 C_F D/W 1-W 2 R2 i,454. - " NAVIGATION INDUSTRIAL PARK -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- •= I-2, ESCO SUPPLY • :_ 642. NOVEMBER 30, 1983 DFSCRTD'[TON PAGE 5 AMOUNT TOTAL -- AMOUNT ASSESSED ITEM OWNER AND NO. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. QUANTITY OF •. ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE LFDPAR❑ STREET TNT.ERS.ECTTON END BALDWIN BLVD END WEST SIDE BALDWIN BOULEVARD AGN.FS ST Ta_i_Eap_AREL_ST ' BEGIN EAST SIDE • 19 FLATO ELECTRIC SUPPLY C/0 PROPERTY SERVICE PD ROX 8808 78419 621.88 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 * 40.64 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 i*104_40 S -F_ C/W 1_n0 —0— S.F. S/W —0— - —0— S.F. D/W —0— —D— S -F- D/_W —0- 12,126.66 792.48 3,_10Q_40 —0— —0— 16,028., LOTS 1, 2, 3 & 4 BLK 6 RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST T—'3 *RTN ON RUSSELL DR RUSSELL DRIVE INTERSECTION 20 R G EICKLEBERRY (;IIARANTY NATI RK 129.31 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 —0— L F C -G & PV-NLT.--,—0— 2,521.55 —0— —0— —0— - 1,285.-75 —0— 3-t-8-02-- BOX 9282'78408 • LOT 3F BLK 5 RUCCFI 1 TNOIISTRTAI OTC * —0- ' S.F. S'/W -0— —0— S.F. S/W —0— 1 — or 2 87 —0— S.F. D/W —0— I-2 *NO SIDEWALK i 71 R rFTrKI FRFRRY ' 100_00 1 _F_f• (; E PVMT 1Q 5n 1,Q50-00 —0— 317.81 —0- . - BOX 9282 78408 LOT 3E BLK 5 RUCSFI 1 TNOIISTRTAI DTCT —0— L.F.C.G.& PVMT. —0— 317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 —0— S F S/W —0— I-2 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 -0— S.F. D/W —0- . 1,285.75 - 3,55 77 R 1 KTIGORF 10D-00 L. C G..&.—PVMT 50 1-,-9-5-0- of —0 - 317.81 —0— 1,285.75 —0- 3 -r5 -i3.—`_ BOX 1715 78408 LOT 3D BLK 5 - R t IC SFLI INDUS_T8LA1 0 T CT -F .—_1..Q —0— . L.F.C.G.& PVMT. —0— 317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 —0— S..L.--S/-W—., —0— 455.94 S.F. 0/W 1-30C 2.82 —0— S.F. D/W —0— I-2 NOVEMBER 30, 1983 11FCCRiPTif1N PAGE 6 TIITAI ITEM NO. OWNER AND PROPERTY.DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF_ - ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT - AMOUNT ; ASSESSED, 23 R L KILGORE 100 00 I.F.C.G G PVMT 19_50 1,950 00 . BOX 1715 78408 -0- "L.F.C.G.E, PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 3C BLK 5 317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 • 317.81 '1, R kil • • 1 -1- .F S/W -0- -0- I-2, SPINDLETOP TUBE 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30 2.82 1,285.75 JOY PETROLEUM CO -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- ,551 A'. . z 24 RAY L' JOHNSON 1QQ.00 I .E,C.,O..F. PVMT. 19.50 • 1,350_00 4234 HERMOSA 78411 -0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 38 BLK 5 500.00 S.F. S/W 1.00 500.00 RU5.,4FLL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S F S/W -0- -0- I-2, TEXAS IND TOOL - -0- S.F. D/W -0- h' -0- . . -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- 2,.450_1 11 0 1.k 11 it 11 • 1 . , 11 617 BARRACUDA 78411 -0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 3A,BLK 5 1,009.52 S.F. S/W 2 1.00 1,009.52 RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0=____S.E. -e- -0- I-2, G.C. SAFETY EQUIP 311.94 S.F. D/W 220F35 2.82 879.67 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 455.94 OTHFR IF 1-30C 7.82 10-115,35 10,310. ' 26 LORAN W ROBERTSON 158.63 L.F.C.G.G PVMT. 19.50 3,093.29 315 DEL MAR 78404 -0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 2 RIK 5 579 86 S.F. S/W 1 00 579_86 RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST f -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- I-2, HARDWARE 203.97 S.F. D/W 130F35 - 2.82 : 575.20 455.94 S.E,. D/W 1-30 7.82 1,785.25 5,484. a, 27 J A KIRSCHKE ET AL 125.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 19.50 2,437.50 a' PO BOX 125 1 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- ,; BOERNE. TX 78006 442.81 S.E.-S/W J .00_ • 447.81 a LOT 1 BLK 5 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 I-2, C.C. SPRING - -0- S.F. D/14 -0- -0- a __ _ _ 4,166. 71 71 NOVEMBER 30, 1983 nPqrRuaTTn RATE,. PAGE 7 AMOUNT ITL AMOUNT ASSESSED ITEM OWNER AND NO. ' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT 2R nONAI D T RIREAU 120.001 F C C F. PVMT_ 19 SO -7,34.0-0.0 4506 BALDWIN 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- LOT 9 BLK 4 417.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 417.81 ' RIjSSFl1 TN. • • I -I- -I- -0- I-2, SOUP-ER CAFE 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- 44043. 29 FUTURE SF(URTTTFS, TNi SRA 44'1 F C R F PVMT 19 5n 11,419 98 C/0 RAY JOHNSON -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- 617 BARRACUDA 78411 2,385.63 S.F. S/W 1.00 2,385.63 1nTS 5. 6. 7 F. R RIK 4 -0- S F S/W -0- -n- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 I-2, BORDEN DENNER, 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 RIOF STAR F TTMF RI _ - • 82 1•,•285°.75 17,678.A 30 BIG THREE IND CORP • 100.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 1,950.00 BOX 3047 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- HCjtISTnN, TX 77nn1 317 8L.S.F C/•W _, 1..00 ,-31.-7-.$1 LOT 4 BLK 4 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 T-7 ••i• -I- a -4- -.- 3,553. 31 R L KILGORE 100.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 1,950.00 BOX 1715 78403 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- I nT 3 RIK 4 31 7 Al S F S/W 1 00 - 3j,7..gy RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S.F.k,S/W -0- -0- I-2, SEABOARD WELLHEAD C 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 VICTORS ATR F. FDLITP -•- I -8_ -0- 3,553. 31A R L KILGORE i 200.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 3,900.00 • PO BOX 1715 78403-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.- -0- -0- IOTS 1 F. 7 RIK 4 - 79?_g1 S F_ S/W, 1 n0 792-.8J RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- I-2 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82 1,454.95 -0- S F D/W -0- -n- 6,147. t NOVEMBER 30, 1983 0FCCRTPTION PAGE 8 a TOTA1 ITEM NO. - OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ' OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT '.RATE AMOUNT AMOUNT a ASSESSED] 'm WESTCHESTER 0R INTFRSFCTTON " a " "a = 32 A R MCI ATN 110..00 1-F f.G g PVMT 19.60 7,.L45 -.-Q0 ra a 215 WESTCHESTER 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- ;a .505 AC 432.19 S.F. S/W 1.00 432.19 KIMRAY ADDITTON -0- S F. S/W -0- -0- 2° • I-2 - - 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 2 e • -0- - S.F. D/W -0- -0- 3,862.9= =9 29 a 33 BERNARD LEE SHORT 140.06 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 19.50 7,731.17 . . 507 S LIBERTY '-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- b VICTORIA, TX 77901 1,.06' X 200' 0 700.30 S.F. S/W -0- $,,..E, S/W 1.00 -. -0- 700.30 -0- f3 " JUANITA NELL SHORT TR -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- x I-2, PHIL OILFIELD -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- as 4. 3 1 ► RV CF uIDC :'•_ SF PViLL. 19.50 J,910 Q0 ,, C/O ROY A BUSBY E CO _]OQ..0-1-.,E•C•,Ss..£ -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT. -0- -0- 13103 PRESTON RD 317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00 317.81 SUITE 710 -0- S.F -1- -�- a DALLAS, TX 75240 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 u b - MIDCAP REALTY CO TRACT 1.-7.2-, I. .. -0-..S.F. D/W -0- - -0- . . 3,553. 35 CANTWELL PROPERTIES 100.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 1,950.00 it PO BOX 4067 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.' -0-• . LOT "'SLK 3 - ' - 1j.81 S.E. SL1L. 1 o 312.._8J y RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- I-2 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 -n- s F fl/w -n- -0- 3,553. le 9 36 DONALD G HEASLEY 100.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT. 19.50 1,950.00 w RT 1, BOX 187C -0- ' L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. -0- -0- ROBSTOWN. TX 70380 741 71 S F S/W_ 1.00 741.3] 5= LOT 2 - -0- S.F. S/W -0-P -0- 53 DICKENSON ADDITION 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75- - ,1 . T-7, C.C. TRACK SUPPI Y 191 .97 S.F .]/_W 120F30 7.$7 641-3. - • 5 4,018. 50 • NOVEMBER 30, 1983 nFCrRTPTTnN PAGE 9 TOTAL ITEM NO. - OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ' OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE •- AMOUNT AMOUNT ASSESSED 37 MFRCANTTLF NATInNAI RANK 1'an_n0 1 F_r_(;_F. PVMT- 19_Rin 2,975_00 PO BOX 991 * 10.00 L.F.C.G.C. PVMT. 19.50 195.00 KINGSVILLE, TX 78363 643.90 S.F. S/W 1.00 643.90 1 OT 1 ' -0- S/.. __, -0- • -0- DICKENSON ADDITION _ ..E.. 263.97 S.F. D/W 180F30 2.82 744.40 I-2, BEKINS STORAGE WHSE -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- *RTN OMAHA nR 4,508. OMAHA DRIVE INTERSECTION 38 JOSEPH L SHEINBERG ET UX . 190.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 3,705.00 249 CIRCLE DR 78411 * 5.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 97.50 I OTCC 15 R 1F 16•_,_LK 2 767.81 S-E..._S/_W 1..0.0 767_R1 RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- I-2, SHEINBERG TOOLS 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 *RTN OMAHA nR - -0- S -F- D/W -0- -0- 5,856. 39 SOUTHERN ENGINE 6 PUMP CO 99.50 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 1,940.25 PO BOX 4206 78408 -0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. -0- -0- 411_40 S_F-..S_W 1 00 411.40 LOT 14 BLK 2 .- -0- S.F. S/W . -0- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST •215.97 S.F. D/W 140F35 2.82 609.04 T_2_, cFPrn -0- S.F nim '-0- -0- 2,960. 40 APPLIED POWER 6 EQUIP 100.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50 1,950.00 - C/0 W.C. DVORAK, PRES -0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. -0- -0- ROX 4158 78,6,9 78 9O C_F- S/W 1..DA 378,._4.0 LOT13 BLK 2 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST 299.97 S.F. D/W 210F35 2.82 845.92 T_2 1 -1- 1 -1- _-,- 3,174. 41 NUECES FOUNDRY INC 100.00 L.F.C.G.C. PVMT. 19.50 1,950.00 C/0 LOUISE N. VANDERBILT -0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. -0- -0- e ROX 4148 7R40R 5130 00 S F- S/W 1.«0-0 5a0 00 LOT 12A,BLK 2 -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST -0- '• S.F. D/W -0- -0- T-? -O--S..E.-D/W -0- -0- 2,450. NOVEMBER 30, 1983 • PAGE 10 nFSCRTPTTON TDTAI ITEM NO. ,OWNER AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF ASSESSED ASSESSMENT ° RATE AMOUNT -AMOUNT ASSESSED, A ■k u ■ C/0 WILLIAM H CARNEY" PO BOX 4188 78408 m LOTS 11 F. 1?t11 K 7 • u 305.48 * ` 23.00 L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. 19.50 448.50 665.36`S.F. S/W1.00 665.36 -0- S_F_ S/W -n- -n- 5,705.4 S. RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST I-2, MFG CO *RTN ON CANTWELL DB 455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75 -0- S.F. D/W -0- -0- B 43 DIVERSIFIED STRUCTURES C/0 HECTOR 0. HEINJOSA VP 5729 LEOPARD 78408 1,010.55 L.F.C.G.C. PVMT. 19.50 19,705.73 * 10.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 195.00 4.638. 17 S.F. S/W x.00 4,63R.3.�. r LOTS 1, 2, 20, 21, 22 6 23 SHAW INDUSTRIAL TRACTS T-7, GENTRY CUPPLY -0- S.F. S/W -0- -0- 515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82, 1,454.95 515.94 C F. 5)/W 1-15C ' 7 R?- 1,454..95 27,449.Q *RTN CANTWELL DR o LEOPARD STREET END RAI DILIEB VD - _ END EAST SIDE END PROJECT , u - TOTAL ASSESSMENTS *** ` 320,084.4, d - e i ,, • 3 n . i SECTION 4. Be it further ordained that in the event the actual frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of said improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet hereinabove stated, the assessments herein set against any such property and against the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be, and the same are hereby declared to be increased or decreased as the case may be, in the proportion which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall bear to the whole number of front feet of property actually improved in accordance with the front foot rule or rate of assessment herein adopted, it being the intention that such parcel of property and the real and true owner or owners thereof abutting on the portion of the streets above described, within the limits defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view the special benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further ordained that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined all certificates hereinafter provided for, issued to evidence said assessments against said parcels of property abutting upon said street, and the real and true owner or owners thereof shall be issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual frontage of said property and the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said certificate in no case to exceed the amount herein assessed against such property unless such increase be caused by an excess of front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost and such actual number of front feet, if different from the hereinabove shown in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the City Engineer upon completion of said work on said street, and the findings of the City Engineer shall be final and binding upon all parties concerned. SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of Section 4 thereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum with reasonable attorney's fee and all costs and expenses of collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a first and prior lien upon the respective parcels of property, against which same are assessed from and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit: October 12, 1983, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein, and that said lien shall be and constitute the first and prior enforceable claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and paramount lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem taxes; and that the same so assessed shall be paid and become payable in one of the following methods at the option of the property owner: 1. All in cash within 30 days after completion or acceptance by City; or 2. Payments to be made in maximum of 120 equal installments, the first of which shall be paid within 30 days after the completion of said improvement, and the acceptance thereof by the City, and the balance to be paid in 59 equal consecutive monthly installments commencing an the 1st day of the next succeeding month until the entire sum is paid in full, together with interest from the date of said completion and acceptance by the City, until paid, at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum; provided, however, that the owners of said property availing themselves of Option "2" or "3" above shall have the privilege of paying one, or all, of such installments at any time before maturity thereof by paying the total amount of principal due, together with interest accrued, to the date of payment. 3. The total number of monthly installments on owner occupied property may be extended beyond 120 in number so that, at the owner's request, the total monthly payments will not exceed ten ($10.00) per month. SECTION 6. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments, the liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels or property and the real and true owner or owners thereof and the time and terms of payment, and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable certificates shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to itself upon the completion of said improvements in said streets and acceptance thereof by said City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the Mayor in the name of the City, attested by the City Secretary, with the corporate seal of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts of said assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon, the date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements for which the certificate is issued, and shall contain the names of the apparent true owner or owners as accurately as possible, and the description of the property assessed by lot and block number, or front foot thereof, or such other description as may otherwise identify the same, and if the said property shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so state the fact shall be sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such property or in giving the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise invalidate or impair the assessment levied hereby' or the certificate issued in evidence thereof. That said certificate shall further provide substantially that if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when due, then at the option of the City, its successors, or assigns, or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidence thereby shall at once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with reasonable attorney's fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and said certificate shall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the real and true owner or owners of such property, and that said lien is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles and charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit: October 12, 1983, and shall provide in effect that if default shall be made in the payment thereof, the same may be enforced, at the option of the City, or their successors and assigns, by the sale of the property therein described in the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above recited, or by suit in any court having jurisdiction. That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all the proceedings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly had in compliance with the law and Charter in force in said City and the proceedings of said City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property therein described, or attempted to be described, and the personal liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, evidence by such certificates, have been regularly done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the matters and facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be required in any court. That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, in the enforcement and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain other and further recitals, pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall not be necessary that said certificates shall be in the exact form as above set forth, but the substance and effect thereof shall suffice. SECTION 7. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability and charge against the real and true owner or owners of the property described, or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not be named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the name of the property owner, or the description of any property or the amount of any assessment, or in any other matter or thing shall not in anywise invalidate or impair any assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued, and such mistake, or error, invalidity or irregularity whether in such assessment or in the certificate issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not required to be, to be enforceable, at any time corrected by the said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi. Further that the omission of said improvements in front of any part of parcel of property abutting upon the aforementioned streets, which is exempt from the lien of said assessment, shall in no wise affect or impair the validity of assessments against the other parcels of property abutting upon said street; and that the total amounts assessed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon said streets within the limits herein defined and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the estimate of said assessment prepared by the City Engineer and approved and adopted by the City Council and are in accordance with the procedures of said City Council relative to said improvements and assessments thereof, and with the terms, powers and provisions of said Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known as Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas and Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under which terms, power and provisions said proceedings, said improvements and assessments were had and made by said City Council. SECTION 8. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, to find and declare an emergency due to the need for efficient administration of City affairs by the closing of such hearing on public street improvements, such finding of an emergency is made and declared requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances or resolutions at three regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the 1st day of December, 1983. ATTEST: Secretary 42J2 e wxVED: cDAY OF Iv /Y ,19g3 : B: Brue� Aycock, ty Attorney ♦ Off Or THE CITY OF ORRIS CHRISTI, TEXAS MAYOR Corpus Christi, Texas / day of CMCJ , 1983 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance or resolution, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances or resolutions at three regular meetings; I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance or resolution finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Council Members 4/7 MAYOR THE CITY 0 'CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS The above ordinance was passed: y the following vote: Luther Jones Betty N. Turner David Berlanga,,Sr. Leo Guerrero Herbert L. Hawkins, Jr. Dr. Charles W. Kennedy Joe McComb Frank Mendez Mary Pat Slavik 17951