HomeMy WebLinkAbout17951 ORD - 12/01/1983AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING
STREETS:
Baldwin Boulevard, (M.H. 408), from Agnes Street to Leopard
Street;
FIXING A LIEN AND CHARGE, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT
AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted
ordinance passed and approved on the 12th day of October, 1983, determined the
necessity for, and ordered the improvement of the following streets:
Baldwin Boulevard, (M.H. 408), from Agnes Street to Leopard
Street;
in the manner and according to the plans and specifications heretofore approved
and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated October 12, 1983, a duly
executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of the said City
with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the City Engineer to prepare
and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amount
per front foot proposed to be assessed against the property abutting upon a
portion of the aforesaid streets within the limits herein defined, to be
improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City Engineer has
heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of other matters relating
thereto with said City Council, and same has been received, examined and
approved by said City Council; and
WHEREAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated
October 12, 1983, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that
portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on the above named
streets, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property
and the real and true owners thereof, and by ordinance dated October 12, 1983,
did order and set a hearing to be held at 3:00 p.m. on the 9th day of November,
1983, in the City Council Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the
real and true owners of the property abutting upon said streets, within the
limits above defined, and for all others owning or claiming any interest in, or
otherwise interested in said property, or any of said matters as to the
assessments and amounts to be assessed against each parcel of abutting property
and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and as to the special benefits to
accrue to said abutting property by virtue of said improvements, if any, or
concerning any error, invalidity, irregularity or deficiency in any proceedings,
or contract, to appear and be heard in person or by counsel and offer evidence
in reference to said matters; and the City Council did by said ordinance order
and direct the City to give notice of said hearing to the owners abutting upon
said streets as shown by the current ad valorem tax roll by mailing such notice
17951
MJCROFILME@
SEP 2 R 1984
to such owners and publishing said notice at least three times in the Corpus
Christi Times before the date of the hearing, such notice of mail and by
publication being in compliance with the provisions of Article 1105b of Vernon's
Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, such notice was given said owners of property as shown on the
current ad valorem tax roll within the limits of the streets being improved by
mailing such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing to such
owners and by publishing three times notice of such hearing in the Corpus
Christi Times, the first of which publication was at least twenty-one (21) days
prior to the date of said hearing; both forms of notice being in compliance with
and containing the information required by Article 11056, Vernon's Annotated
Civil Statutes; and
WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as provided
by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing of which
notice was given, was opened and held on November 9, 1983, in the City Council
Chambers in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance with said ordinance
and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all said abovementioned
persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents and attorneys, to be
heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance
and notice, at which time the following appeared and offered the following
testimony:
•
r Council Meeting
oeN, Ae 9, 1983
Page 15
award will produce $240,000 m
therefore, the Staff is res2pmending
Bank - Corpus Christi w. h is in the
this contract wil for the balance
ed to the Co�nc1 that the bids the City
e err competitive and the recommended
oryRn 1... t had been received previously;
that the-awa! be made to Texas Commerce
best interest of\the City. He noted that
of this Council's term ofo` ice.
City Manager Martin exp
received under this bidding format
otion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the foregoing
roved, seconded by Council Member Berlanga and passed unanimously.
Mayor Jones announced the public hearing on the following item:
26. 3:00 p.m. - Assessment hearing on the Baldwin Boulevard reconstruction
project from Agnes to Leopard Street. The roll provides for assessments of
$322,974.96 on 43 items.
Assistant City Manager Lontos- explained that this project is for
improvements to Baldwin Boulevard which was included in the 1977 Bond Program.
He explained that it is under the Urban Systems Program and the City will pay
for the drainage, right-of-way, utility adjustments and concrete street work.
He pointed out that itis not a Voluntary Paving Program but it is necessary and
was placed in the Bond Election as a major thoroughfare.
City Attorney Bruce Aycock explained that this public hearing-is='required
by State Law and the purpose is to provide testimony to enable the Council to
make a decision as to whether or not the assessments charged are equal in value
to the improvements. He called as his first witness Mr. Gerald Smith, City
Engineer.
Through questioning of Mr. Smith, Mr. Aycock ascertained that he was
properly qualified and had been with the City for 24 years. He noted that a
copy of his qualifications in resume form is on file in a City office. He
inquired of Mr. Smith if cost estimates have been made on this project.
Mr. Smith testified that they have been made by the State Department of
Highways and Public Transportation. He explained that this project is to
improve Baldwin Boulevard from Agnes Street to Leopard Street and this is one of
the last remaining streets to be reconstructed under the 1977 Bond Program and
that it is partially funded through the Urban Systems Program. He informed the
Council that the State designed the project in cooperation with the City Staff
and bids were received by the State Office. .
Mr. Smith explained that the proposal is to widen Baldwin Boulevard to 62
feet from back of curb. He noted that there will be two moving lanes of traffic
in each direction; parking is not contemplated on this street; additional storm
sewers will be installed; and sidewalks are proposed to be installed. He stated
that the low bidder was Wright Way Construction Company and the bid price was
k _ s
Regular Council Meeting
November 9, 1983 '
Page 16
$1,323,985.70. He stated that the existing right-of-way is 120 feet wide and
the improvements will include a standard 6" curb and gutter section, 8"
stabilized subgrade, 10" thick flexible base, 5 3/4" asphalt stabilized base and
of Type D Hot Mix Asphaltic Pavement. He pointed out that 4 -foot wide
reinforced concrete sidewalks will be constructed 11 feet from the back of the
curb and that 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways will be constructed. Mr.
Smith listed the bid price and assessment rates as follows: Curb, Gutter and
Pavement - Bid Price, $60.16 per linear foot, Assessment Rate - $19.50 per
linear foot; Sidewalk - $1.40 per square foot, Assessment Rate - $1.00 per
square foot; Driveways - $2.82 per square foot, Assessment Rate - $2.82 per
square foot. He stated that the commercial rate will apply because there are no
residential properties on this street.
Mr. Smith continued his explanation by stating that the City proposes to
construct the sidewalks 11 feet from the street to allow for parking by the
abutting property owners and 98 feet of the right-of-way will be used; but 22
feet would be available for parking purposes by those owners. He stated that
the assessment roll had been computed according to the existing Assessment
Ordinance and the total assessment price is $323,179.41. He pointed out that
the assessments may be paid in cash at the completion of the project; they may
be paid over a five-year period in monthly installments at an interest rate of
8% or in case of a hardship, this period may be extended to two years. He
stated that the contract has been awarded by the State and the contractor has
started preliminary work.' He assured the Council that access will-be=provided
to all of the property during construction and the project will require
approximately 9 months of construction time.
Mr. Smith stated that during the public hearing conducted by the State and
the City Staff, many of the property owners indicated that they were looking
forward to the improvement project but they saw no reason for the construction
of sidewalks and in.fact, the City had received a petition from all of the
property owners requesting that the sidewalks not be installed.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she would have to concur that sidewalks
are not needed in this industrial area. She noted that this is not a voluntary
project.
Mr. Smith explained that even though there is 120 feet of right-of-way, the
Staff is not recommending that all of that be used but that 11 feet of it be
used for parking by the property owners. He explained that many of the property
owners have been using the public right-of-way for parking for many years. He
agreed that the question of sidewalks in industrial areas has been discussed
before and that the Platting Ordinance has been amended in regard to sidewalks
in interior areas of industrial subdivisions but at the time that amendment was
made, the Council placed three conditions on which sidewalks must be constructed
even in industrial areas and Baldwin Boulevard meets two of those three
conditions in that it is a collector street and is on the perimeter of an
industrial area. He explained that the right-of-way is difficult to define
because there are no sidewalks and people have a tendency to indiscriminantly
tes
vu
{lar Council Meeting
November 9, 1983
Page 17
park in the right-of-way at this time. He pointed out that the addition of
sidewalks and curbs would eliminate that practice. He expressed the opinion
that header curbs would be required if the sidewalks are not constructed and the
property owner would be assessed for the header curbs in lieu of sidewalks.
Mr. Smith continued his explanation by noting that some of the streets
being improved in the Baldwin/Leopard project extend on to Baldwin Boulevard and
the construction of sidewalks on this street would tie both projects together.,
City Attorney Aycock called as his first witness Mr. W. J. Holly and
established that he is a Licensed Real Estate Broker qualified to testify in
this hearing. He noted that Mr. Holly's qualifications in resume form are on
file in the City office.
Mr. Holly testified that he is familiar with each and every parcel of land
included in this project and that in his opinion, all of the property will be
enhanced at least in the amount of each individual assessment.
Mr. Holly then read his notes recording his observations regarding the
necessity for sidewalks, indicating that in his opinion, some of the businesses
are relatively close and it is possible that walk-in customers might use the
sidewalk between the buildings. Mr. Holly also testified that the need for
improved streets, curbs and gutters is very evident and the drainage will be
improved_as well.
Council Member Kennedy inquired if the City had ever considered installing
sidewalks on one side of the street only, and Mr. .Smith replied that they
considered this when Airline Road between Ocean Drive and Williams was improved.
He explained that the reason it was considered was because Seaside Cemetery
•
sides on Airline and the Staff considered the possibility of not installing
sidewalks alongside their property, however later the decision was made to
install the sidewalks and they are used extensively by pedestrians and joggers.
Speaking in opposition to the requirement for sidewalks was Mr. Louis
Holder, representing Moreman Tire Company which is in the 4500 block of Baldwin.
He stated that he had submitted a petition signed by 100% of the property owners
objecting to the sidewalks. He stated that they looked forward to the street
improvements but they could not see any need for sidewalks and felt that
actually, they would be a detriment. He pointed out that even if they are
allowed to use 11 feet of right-of-way for parking, his company would still have
a parking problem.
Council Member Kennedy inquired if his building met the code requirements
for off-street parking, and Mr. Holder replied that he did not know since it was
constructed 25 years ago.
Mr. Tom Stewart, Director of Transportation, confirmed that this street
would be no different from the situation on Everhart, Airline, etc. which do not
have on -street parking either.
. ces
Regular Council Meeting
November 9, 1983
Page 18
Mr. Holder also expressed the opinion that when customers park in front of
their businesses, they will have a tendency to park on the sidewalk and it will
soon be destroyed anyway.
Council Member McComb inquired of Mr. Holder if the property owners would
be willing to install bumpers to keep the cars from parking on the curb, and Mr.
Holder stated that he felt that they would be willing to do that.
Mr. Smith pointed out that header curbs are almost the same thing that Mr.
McComb mentioned and he felt that they need something to define the
right-of-way. He pointed out that if that curb is constructed, it will be
assessed against the property owner and will cost $7 to $8 per linear foot and
would be twice the cost of a sidewalk. Mr. Smith reiterated that if something
is not done to define the right-of-way, the result will be indiscriminate use of
the right-of-way.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner expressed the opinion that sidewalks would have some
negative effect on these property owners.
Mr. Lontos stated that what the Staff is trying to tell the Council is that
they feel when you have a major street such as Baldwin, a number of things have
to go into the improvements; it is necessary when parking space is not available
that something should be provided for the people to walk on who -are doing
business in the area; and the Staff feels that the sidewalks are essential to
the people who are conducting business in the area. He pointed out that there
is also a residential subdivision very near here.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner pointed out that there have been no sidewalks located
there for twenty years nor have there been any requests for sidewalks.
Mr. Lontos reiterated that the Staff must tell the Council what the policy
is and that is what the Staff must make a recommendation on in terms of the
street itself. He stated that the Staff feels that it is needed even though at
the present time there may not be an evident need for sidewalks, this situation
could change in the future and they could be needed. He pointed out that they
are just following the Council's policy in that on major thoroughfares,
sidewalks are always constructed and if they are not constructed on this street,
a precedent will be established.
Council Member Kennedy inquired if the major problem was the amount of
money that it would cost the property owners or the number of feet that will be
lost.
Mr. Holder stated that they are concerned about the space that they will
lose. -
Regular Council Meeting,
November 9, 1963
Page 19
Also speaking in opposition to the construction of the sidewalk was Mr.
Frank Wiggins of Ray West Warehouse. He pointed out that 100% of the property
owners expressed opposition to the installation of sidewalks. He agreed that
they have been using the City right-of-way but he still felt there is no reason
for sidewalks on a major arterial street, pointing out that there are none on
Leopard or Agnes Streets. He assured the Council that there are never any
school children walking on this street and if sidewalks are constructed, they
will experience difficulty with trucks attempting to turn around.
Also speaking in opposition was. Mr. Hy Goodman, representing Century
Papers, who stated that they own 850 feet on Baldwin and Agnes and in his
opinion, there is no reason ever for anyone to walk on that. street. He
explained the increased size of the trucks that serve his company now and that
sidewalks would further hamper their ability to move trucks in and out. He
stated that he sees no reason for header curbs either.
Also speaking in opposition to the installation of sidewalks was Mr.
Malcolm F. Sterett, representing Sterrett Supply Company at 4533 Baldwin; Mr.
Henry McDowell, representing Flato Supply Company; Mr. Ray Johnson, representing
Future Securities, who explained that he is involved in leasing rental property
which is an industrial strip center. He pointed out that they already have a
sidewalk to connect their different businesses and there is no need for an
additional—sidewalk because that would eliminate the possibility of head -in
parking in the front of the businesses. He admitted that they are using 20 to
30 feet of City right-of-way but it is not being utilized for parking but for
automobiles entering the areas of the buildings.
Council Member Slavik stated that she had noted that some of the owners had
indicated that they would be willing to install sidewalks in the future if they
ever became necessary for a walk-in type of business.
Mr. Smith stated that if the Council determined that there was a necessity
for it in the future, there would be an option to install them then.
A motion was made by Council Member McComb that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed unanimously.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the sidewalks included in
the plan be deleted from the improvements with no provision for header curbs;
seconded by Council Member Mendez.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he was apprehensive about deleting the
sidewalks and referred to Nottarb Place, which is known as "WOW", and stated
that he had observed cars parked in different of ways out there including on the
curb, etc. He stated that for this reason, he felt there was some necessity for
the sidewalks. He agreed that the plans as they exist now do take more space
from the property owners than is necessary and he would be in favor of moving
the sidewalk to within one foot of the curb which would result in a lesser loss
of property to the property owners.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting'
November 9, 1983
Page 20
Mayor Jones summarized that the Staff has presented a paving project on the
basis of the City's existing policies. He also noted the fact that so much of
the land on each side is being used by the property owners and the proposed
action in effect takes back City land that the property owners have been using.
He stated that he, too, had a problem with the motion. He pointed out that the
proposed action amends the City ordinance and if these sidewalks are eliminated,
a precedent may be established.
Mr. Smith agreed that the sidewalk as it exists in the Plans is to be
constructed 14 feet from the curb, and as an option, they could move the
sidewalk adjacent to the curb.
City Manager Martin noted that one of the things before the Council is
whether it is the loss of property or the necessity for the sidewalks that is at
issue. He stated that if it is a loss of property, Mr. Smith has just mentioned
the possibility of moving the sidewalk adjacent to the curb. Mr. Martin
expressed the opinion that it is important to have the sidewalk installed and
that option might be more acceptable to the property owners if they are in fact
saying that the loss of property is their real concern.
Mr. McComb noted that there will be a loss of property due to the fact that
the street will be widened and if trucks go over the sidewalks, they will be
damaged. -�
Mr. Smith pointed out that if the sidewalks are moved closer to the street,
the cost of the driveways would be substantially reduced. He also noted that if
the plans are changed, it may be necessary for the City Staff to renegotiate
with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation.
Mr. McComb suggested that this matter be tabled until the Staff has an
opportunity to discuss this with the State.
Council Member Berlanga inquired about the necessity for 5 -foot sidewalks,
and Mr. Smith replied that the standard City policy is to have 4 -foot wide
sidewalks if they are away from the curb but if they are immediately adjacent to
the curb, they are usually 5 feet wide.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner amended her original motion to construct 4 -foot wide
sidewalks immediately adjacent to the curb, seconded by Council Member Berlanga.
Council Member McComb asked about the impact that would have on the entire
City if the width of the sidewalks is changed to 4 -foot wide when the ordinance
requires 5 feet.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner then amended her motion as previously amended to
specify 5 -foot wide sidewalks flush with the curb, seconded by Council Member
Berlanga.
This motion passed unanimously by those present and voting.
eg
ar Council Meeting
November 9, 1963
Page 21
Mr. Smith informed the Council that the assessment roll will have to be
revised and they hope to have the ordinance on the agenda next week or the
following week.
*
Mayor Jones announced the public hearing on the following item
27. :15 p.m. - Closing and abandonment of Iris and Eklund Avenues om the
Clarkwood drainage channel to Commerce Street including two alley- in Block
6 ah 7 in the Clarkwood Subdivision. None of the streets o alleys are
open a this time.
Assistant ity Manager Lontos located the streets on a transparency and
stated that the p oposal is to close the streets which dead- d at the Clarkwood
drainage ditch. H stated that they also propose to cl•.e two alleys in the
same area. He assu d the Council that the Staff ha no objections to the
closing of the streets nd alleys if proper drainage •nd utility easements are
retained. He stated tha\ here will be no adverse e ect on the traffic in the
area.
Mayor Jones ascertained th•• no one wishes to speak in opposition to these
street closings.
A motion was made by Mayor P T- Turner that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Berlanga a passed unanimously.
A motion was made by Mayor : o Te Turner that the streets and alleys
listed be closed, seconded by Council Membe Berlanga and passed unanimously.
City Secretary Read pol -d the Council fo their votes and the following
ordinance was passed:
27. ORDINANCE NO. 1793
CLOSING AND AB=•`DONING IRIS AVENUE FROM COMMERCE ST T TO A POINT 285 FEET
EAST, EKLUND •VENUE FROM COMMERCE STREET TO A POINT 2a, FEET EAST, THE 20
FOOT WIDE LEYS IN BLOCKS 6 AND 7, CLARKWOOD SUBDI+.SIGN; SUBJECT TO
PROVISIO LISTED BELOW; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The a arter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance •=ssed by the
fo owing vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Kennedy, McComb, -ndez and
avik voting, "Aye"; Guerrero and Hawkins, "absent".
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously
carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and
WHEREAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony being
offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of said
abutting property as compared to cost of the improvements of said portion of
said streets proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any errors,
invalidities or irregularities, in the proceeding or contract heretofore had in
reference to the portions of said streets to be improved; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special
benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real
and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said
improvements on said streets within the limits above defined, and has heard
all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all protests and
objections relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidities or
irregularities in any of the proceedings and contract for said improvements,
and has given a full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to
make any such protest, objection or offer testimony and has fully examined
and considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests offered and
based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said City Council finds
that each and every parcel of property abutting upon the portion of the
streets aforesaid within the limits to be improved as herein defined, will be
enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construction of said
improvements upon the said streets upon which said improvements proposed to
be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said parcel of
abutting property, and the real and true owners thereof, and said City
Council did consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiences
called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were
proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City and the laws of the
State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had, and the
proceedings of said City Council heretofore had with reference to such
improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City
Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments hereinbelow
made and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property on the
portions of the streets hereinabove described, within the limits defined, and
the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable and did
adopt the rule of apportionment set out below and the division of the cost of
said improvements between said abutting properties, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable, and as producing substantial
equality considering the benefits to be received and the burdens imposed
thereby, and that all objections and protests should be overruled and denied
except the corrections and changes as appear on the final assessment roll
included in this ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for or
against said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners of
abutting property on said streets, within the limits above defined, and to all
persons, firms, corporations and estates, owning or claiming same or any
interest therein, be and the same is hereby closed and all protests and
objections, whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are
hereby overruled and denied.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon
the evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel or property abutting
upon the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined, that the special
benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and
true owner or owners thereof, by virtue to the construction of said
improvements to said portion of said streets upon which said property abuts,
will be in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements as proposed
to be, and as herein assessed against said abutting property and the real and
true owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of the cost of said
improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow made are just and
equitable and produce substantial equality considering the benefits received
and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance with the laws of the
State of Texas, and the Charter provisions of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore had with reference to
said improvements are in all respects regular, proper and valid, and that all
prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens against said abutting
properties, as hereinabove described and the personal liability of the real
and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or
not, have been in all things regularly had and performed in compliance with
the law, Charter provisions and proceedings of the said City Council.
SECTION 3. That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted by said
City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of the above described
street, within the limits defined, and in pursuance of said proceedings
heretofore had and enacted by said City Council, in reference to said
improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to
said street improvements by the laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of
said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First
Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as
Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, there
shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective
parcels or property abutting upon said portion of said streets, and against the
real and true owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners be
named or correctly named herein or not, the several sums of money hereinbelow
mentioned and itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels of
said property, the number of front feet of each and the several amounts assessed
against same and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and names of the
apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted by said City Council,
being as follows, to -wit:
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
BALDWIN BOULEVARD (M.H. 408)
FROM AGNES STREET TO LEOPARD STREET
This project shall include improvements to Baldwin Boulevard within the limits
described and provides for excavation to a width and depth to permit the constr-
uction of a 62 foot wide street (back of the curb) within the existing 120 foot
wide right-of-way. The improvements include a standard 6" curb and gutter
section, 8" thick stabilized subgrade, 10" thick flexible base (caliche), 5 3/4"
asphalt stablized base, and 1 1/4" of Type "D" Hot Mix asphaltic pavement. There
will be 5' wide reinforced concrete sidewalks constructed tied to the back of
the curb and 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways as shown on the plans.
This project is being constructed by the City and the State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation and is an improvement assessment project. Based on
the low bid submitted by Wright Way Construction Company and the City's current
assessment policy, abutting property owners are assessed at the following rates:
Bid Price Assessment Rate
Curb, Gutter & Pavement $60.16 L.F. $19.50 L.F.
Sidewalk $ 1.40 S.F. $ 1.00 S.F.
Driveways _ $ 2.82 S.F. $ 2.82 S.F.
There is no residential property, churches or schools along the street section
being constructed.
Total Bid Price
State & Federal Portion
Final Assessments
* City Share
* Includes City utilities adjustments.
$1,323,985.70
$1,045,603.20
$ 320,084.04
$ 299,382.50
Gerald Smith, P.E.
City Engineer
GS/dl
1
2
6
e
N 3
o
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
nFSf RTPTTn
PAGE 1
• • L
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT'.
ASSESSED
FZNR ACCFCCMFNT Rnl1
BAL'OWIN BOULEVARD
•
AYERS ST TO LEOPARD ST
BEGIN WEST SIDE
All
S/W 5' WTDF F TIFn Tn CIIRR
1
CnRTFX TNVFCTMFNT Cn
R57-81 L.F.C.6.E PVMT.
19-50
.6,629,.$0
C/0 HY GOODMAN
-0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT.
-0-
-0-
P.O. BOX 4353 78469
3,874.67 S.F. S/W
1.00
3,874.67
IOTC 1,2, F,, 3 RIK 7
-R- C F S/W
-n-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
I-3/I-2,CENTURY PAPER
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C •
-2.82
1,454.95 -
23 '245.:
7
(1111 F SIIPP( Y Cn TN(
2A0 -n0 L F C G.F PVM.T-
14 50
5,070 00
C/O CLARK -E COMPANY
-0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT.
-0-
-0-
2510 TIMES BLVD
1,092.81 S.F. S/W
1.00.
1,092.8.1
HRUSTnN, TX 77nn5
-0- S.F- S/
-n-
-0
1.558 AC OF LOT 19, BLK 19
-W
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
RUSSELL FARM BLK
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
L.2_,. 6111 F CIIPPI Y
7,617.
3
LONE STAR CO
120.00 L.F.C.G.6 PVMT.
19.50
2,340.00
C/O JOHN G MEADOWS
-0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT.
-0-
-0-
R n x 75 2E, 5
417-81 S_ F_ S j4 .
1,,.0,0
417_,-8-1.
DALLAS, TX 75265
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
,-0-
LOT 5 BLK 7
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
RIISSFI I FARM_B.0
-0- S..F- Q/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, LONE STAR CO
4,043.
•
4
HENSLEY K BALEY 6
120.00 L.F.C•G.6 PVMT.
19.50_
2,340.00
N(1RMAN R (I ASSON
-n- I _F-C-r_F cVMT_,
-0-
-0-
PO BOX 9576 78408
417.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
417.81
120 FT X 210 FT, .689 AC-
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
RIK 19 •.0 -
• - •
• 7.5
I-2, HOSE OF SO TX &
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
_
-0-
CAPITAL BEARING CO
o
NOVEMBER 30; 1983
DFSCRIPTION
PAGE 2
Tf1TAl ■
ITEM
N0.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY - OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
, AMOUNT
AMOUNT ASSESSED,
5
LEE LANPHIFR ET UX
230_13 L.F C C,, f PVMT
19.50
4,407.54
PO BOX 4961 78408
LOT 7 BLK 7
RUSSELL JNDUSTRIAL ARFA
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
- 968.46 S.F. S/W
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
1.00
-0-
-0- •
968.46 u
-0-
I-2, THRIFT CARPET
455.94 S.F. 0/W 1-30C
-0- S.F. D/W
2.82
-0-
1,285.75
-0- t.
e
6,
VIIJA DRTVE INTFR5FCTIUk.-
_
6
P K HRTSSTKOPOIIIUS FT Al
700 00 1 _F.f G E PVMT_
19_50
3,900 It
4456 SO STAPLES 78411
-0- 'L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 14 BLK 8
792.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
792.81
RU,.SELJ_ INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S.F. S/W '
-.-
-1-
I-2, VALLEY PUMP, INC
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95 .
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
0
7
I M C.FRSMAN ET AL
150:00 L F.C.,G.&_
1940
7,975 Q0
C/O PROPERTY TX SVC CO
.VMT
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
=
PO BOX 8808 78412
542.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
542.81
=
1 flT 13 RI K 0
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL AREA
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
I-2, MOREMAN TIRE CO
--0- S.F. D/W
-0-
.-0-
.
8
MAI Cr1I M F STERETT
190.00 I .F.C_C.6 PVMT.
19 50
,------........-44
7,975-00
°
4533 BALDWIN 78408
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 8 BLK 88
(LUSS L TND 1STRTAI AREA
482.81 S.F. S/W •
• -0- S.E_._.S/
1.00
-0-
482.81
• -0.-
0-
I-2, STERETT SUPPLY CO
1-2,
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
239.94 S.F. D/W 1-12C
2.82
676.63
5 -
•
■
9
WAL e SU' • 1 I
el • t E.T. G.& PVM.T..
19 50
7,_a0.0...00
■
C/O G.S. BAHR
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
o
BOX 4876 78469
1,585.62 S.F. S/W
1.00
1,585.62
1 n 6 RI K 8
-0- S F. S/W
-0-
- -
=
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL AREA
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
I-1, WALLACE SUPPLY
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C.
2.82
1,454.95
17,29
•
.
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
RFSCRTPTTIIN
PAGE 3
._
-TfTAL
-0 AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
In
WTILTAMSnN T HOUGH
377_71 1 F C.G S PVMT
lq SO
7,365-35
C/O JACK MILLER
-0- L.F.C.G.E PVMT.
-0-
4:1-
PO BOX 7427 78415
1,888.55 S.F. S/W
1.00
1,888.55
1 IlT 4 RI K R
-(1- S _F_ S/W
-0-
- -0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
I-2
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
9,253_
11
WFST AMnFRSON,.._I11
1n011n LF C GE-..P_Wd-
PO BOX 5202 78405
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 3 BLK 8
317.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
317.81
RiISSFI1 TNMISTRTAI nT.ST
-(1- SJ S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, ANDERSON WEST
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
12
J111-IN M ANfFRSfN
110-00 L-F-C-G-& PVIAT-
19-50
2 - ■■
125 LAKESHORE 78413
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0--
LOT 2 BLK 8
542.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
542.81
RIISCFI I 114111 S.TAIALD.IST
-0=.SF S/
-■-
-■-
I-2, D.I.A. DRILLING
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
0-
.14,922-.--
42.3.-13
11
NORMA IFF MTffAP
211_33 F fG_ Z.,..RVh1.T-
19-50
4-,.39, 94
13101 PRESTON RD, SUITE 210
* 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
DALLAS, TX 75240
1,084.46 S.F. S/W
1.00
1,084.46
LnT 1 RIK R
-0- S F S/W
-0- -
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
455.94-S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
I-2, MIDCAP BEARING
#RTN DMA_HA
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
,
_(1B
7,310.
OMAHA DRIVE INTERSECTION
-`
14
ARMCO STEEL CORP
165.70 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
3,231.15
1455 WEST LOOP SOUTH
* 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
975.00
H(111STnN, TX 77(127
646...11 S-F f/W
1-00--------646,S1
LOT14 BLK 6
-0- S.F. S/W
-0- -0-
NAVIGATION INDUSTRIAL PARK
* 320.00 S.F. D/W 1-30C_
2.82
902.40
- ■
'4 S-F_ D/-W-1=30G
1,285-4-5
*RTN ON OMAHA
-2-.82
7,040.1
=
'
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
DFSCRIPTION
PAGE 4
TOTAL
ITEM
. ' NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY ' OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
°
15
CRAWFORD & HALL
150.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
2,975.00
4721 BALDWIN 78408
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
+
NUECES COFFEE CO TR
542.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
542.81
=
150 FT X 250 FT S OF BQLDWIN
-0- S,U-
0-
W OF OMAHA, BLK 119
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
°
RUSSELL FARM TR
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
'
I-2. MEMBRANF SFRVIGF
°
4,922.
7
18
16
ZELMA KINS
410.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
7,995.00
PO BOX 9132 78408
* 50.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
975.00
'+
LOTS 1, 2. 3 & 4 BLK 6
1,635.62 S.F. S/W
1.40
1.635.E
NAVIGATION INDUSTRIAL PARK
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
1-2 COOR DISTRIBUTOR
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C '
2.82
- 1,454.95
u
*RTN ON CANT ELL DR
W
515.94 S.E...•-D/1_35C
?.R7
5
°
.3,•54..35
13,515.
,
CANTWELL INTERSECTION
a
17
RAY WEST WAREHOUSE, INC
683.22 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
13,322.79
u
PETER 8 ANDERSON VI PRES
* 50.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
19.50
975.00
PO ROX 456 78403
2.694.95 C F S/W_
1.00
7,F,94._95
a
LOT 1 BLK 1
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
.
NAVIGATION'INDUSTRIAL PARK
635.94 S.F. D/W 1-45C
2.82
1,793.35
b
I-?. WFST 6 CATNS,.,1rLA8EJ:U1•UCF
615.94 S.E.,_DL1 1,-.
7.R7
1,793.35
*RTN CANTWELL DR
515.94 OTHER LF 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
22,034.
a•
'>
17A
RAY WEST PROPERTIES LTD
243.70 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50,
4,752.15
LTD PARTNERS.HIE,
-D- 1 .,E..C..-G•.F. PVAL.
-1- -
-41-
„
PO BOX 456 78403
829.12 S.F. S/W
1.00
829.12
N .73 AC OF LOT 4 BLK 1
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
La _ t. Lt,
1 . - t
.87
1,285..25
.
I-2, CME & L.G.R.INC
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
. 1,454.95
8,321.
.
19
18
ESCO SUPPLY CO
202.24 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
3,943.68
,
UN IO _ BZ W t '
-t- ' 0
-i-
t-
=
PO BOX 1078
• 804.01 S.F. S/W
1.00
804.01_
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78294
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
'9
1 DTC 6 F._7 R_L_K 1
515_94 C_F D/W 1-W
2 R2
i,454. -
"
NAVIGATION INDUSTRIAL PARK
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
•=
I-2, ESCO SUPPLY
•
:_
642.
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
DFSCRTD'[TON
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
TOTAL --
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ITEM OWNER AND
NO. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
QUANTITY OF •.
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE
LFDPAR❑ STREET TNT.ERS.ECTTON
END BALDWIN BLVD
END WEST SIDE
BALDWIN BOULEVARD
AGN.FS ST Ta_i_Eap_AREL_ST
' BEGIN EAST SIDE •
19 FLATO ELECTRIC SUPPLY
C/0 PROPERTY SERVICE
PD ROX 8808 78419
621.88 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50
* 40.64 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50
i*104_40 S -F_ C/W 1_n0
—0— S.F. S/W —0— -
—0— S.F. D/W —0—
—D— S -F- D/_W —0-
12,126.66
792.48
3,_10Q_40
—0—
—0—
16,028.,
LOTS 1, 2, 3 & 4 BLK 6
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
T—'3
*RTN ON RUSSELL DR
RUSSELL DRIVE INTERSECTION
20 R G EICKLEBERRY
(;IIARANTY NATI RK
129.31 L.F.C.G.& PVMT. 19.50
—0— L F C -G & PV-NLT.--,—0—
2,521.55
—0—
—0—
—0—
- 1,285.-75
—0—
3-t-8-02--
BOX 9282'78408
• LOT 3F BLK 5
RUCCFI 1 TNOIISTRTAI OTC
* —0- ' S.F. S'/W -0—
—0— S.F. S/W —0—
1 — or 2 87
—0— S.F. D/W —0—
I-2
*NO SIDEWALK
i
71 R rFTrKI FRFRRY '
100_00 1 _F_f• (; E PVMT 1Q 5n
1,Q50-00
—0—
317.81
—0-
.
-
BOX 9282 78408
LOT 3E BLK 5
RUCSFI 1 TNOIISTRTAI DTCT
—0— L.F.C.G.& PVMT. —0—
317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00
—0— S F S/W —0—
I-2
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82
-0— S.F. D/W —0-
. 1,285.75
-
3,55
77 R 1 KTIGORF
10D-00 L. C G..&.—PVMT 50
1-,-9-5-0- of
—0 -
317.81
—0—
1,285.75
—0-
3 -r5 -i3.—`_
BOX 1715 78408
LOT 3D BLK 5 -
R t IC SFLI INDUS_T8LA1 0 T CT
-F .—_1..Q
—0— . L.F.C.G.& PVMT. —0—
317.81 S.F. S/W 1.00
—0— S..L.--S/-W—., —0—
455.94 S.F. 0/W 1-30C 2.82
—0— S.F. D/W —0—
I-2
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
11FCCRiPTif1N
PAGE 6
TIITAI
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY.DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY OF_
- ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT -
AMOUNT ;
ASSESSED,
23
R L KILGORE
100 00 I.F.C.G G PVMT
19_50
1,950 00
.
BOX 1715 78408
-0- "L.F.C.G.E, PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 3C BLK 5
317.81 S.F. S/W
1.00 •
317.81
'1,
R kil • • 1
-1- .F S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, SPINDLETOP TUBE
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30
2.82
1,285.75
JOY PETROLEUM CO
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
,551
A'.
.
z
24
RAY L' JOHNSON
1QQ.00 I .E,C.,O..F. PVMT.
19.50
• 1,350_00
4234 HERMOSA 78411
-0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 38 BLK 5
500.00 S.F. S/W
1.00
500.00
RU5.,4FLL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S F S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, TEXAS IND TOOL -
-0- S.F. D/W
-0- h'
-0-
.
.
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
2,.450_1
11 0 1.k 11
it 11
• 1
. , 11
617 BARRACUDA 78411
-0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 3A,BLK 5
1,009.52 S.F. S/W
2 1.00
1,009.52
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0=____S.E.
-e-
-0-
I-2, G.C. SAFETY EQUIP
311.94 S.F. D/W 220F35
2.82
879.67
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
455.94 OTHFR IF 1-30C
7.82
10-115,35
10,310.
'
26
LORAN W ROBERTSON
158.63 L.F.C.G.G PVMT.
19.50
3,093.29
315 DEL MAR 78404
-0- L.F.C.G.G PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 2 RIK 5
579 86 S.F. S/W
1 00
579_86
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
f -0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, HARDWARE
203.97 S.F. D/W 130F35
- 2.82 :
575.20
455.94 S.E,. D/W 1-30
7.82
1,785.25
5,484.
a,
27
J A KIRSCHKE ET AL
125.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT.
19.50
2,437.50
a'
PO BOX 125 1
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
,;
BOERNE. TX 78006
442.81 S.E.-S/W
J .00_
• 447.81
a
LOT 1 BLK 5
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
I-2, C.C. SPRING
-
-0- S.F. D/14
-0-
-0-
a
__ _ _
4,166.
71
71
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
nPqrRuaTTn
RATE,.
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
ITL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ITEM OWNER AND
NO. ' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
2R nONAI D T RIREAU
120.001 F C C F. PVMT_
19 SO
-7,34.0-0.0
4506 BALDWIN 78408
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
LOT 9 BLK 4
417.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
417.81
'
RIjSSFl1 TN. • • I
-I-
-I-
-0-
I-2, SOUP-ER CAFE
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
44043.
29 FUTURE SF(URTTTFS, TNi
SRA 44'1 F C R F PVMT
19 5n
11,419 98
C/0 RAY JOHNSON
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
617 BARRACUDA 78411
2,385.63 S.F. S/W
1.00
2,385.63
1nTS 5. 6. 7 F. R RIK 4
-0- S F S/W
-0-
-n-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
I-2, BORDEN DENNER,
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
RIOF STAR F TTMF RI
_ - •
82
1•,•285°.75
17,678.A
30 BIG THREE IND CORP
•
100.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
1,950.00
BOX 3047
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
HCjtISTnN, TX 77nn1
317 8L.S.F C/•W
_,
1..00
,-31.-7-.$1
LOT 4 BLK 4
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
T-7 ••i•
-I- a
-4-
-.-
3,553.
31 R L KILGORE
100.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
19.50
1,950.00
BOX 1715 78403
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
I nT 3 RIK 4
31 7 Al S F S/W
1 00
- 3j,7..gy
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S.F.k,S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, SEABOARD WELLHEAD
C
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
VICTORS ATR F. FDLITP
-•- I
-8_
-0-
3,553.
31A R L KILGORE i
200.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
19.50
3,900.00
•
PO BOX 1715 78403-0-
L.F.C.G.& PVMT.-
-0-
-0-
IOTS 1 F. 7 RIK 4
- 79?_g1 S F_ S/W,
1 n0
792-.8J
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C
2.82
1,454.95
-0- S F D/W
-0-
-n-
6,147.
t
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
0FCCRTPTION
PAGE 8
a
TOTA1
ITEM
NO.
- OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY ' OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT '.RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT a
ASSESSED]
'm
WESTCHESTER 0R INTFRSFCTTON
"
a
"
"a
=
32
A R MCI ATN
110..00 1-F f.G g PVMT
19.60
7,.L45 -.-Q0
ra
a
215 WESTCHESTER 78408
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
;a
.505 AC
432.19 S.F. S/W
1.00
432.19
KIMRAY ADDITTON
-0- S F. S/W
-0-
-0-
2°
•
I-2 - -
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
2
e
•
-0- - S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
3,862.9=
=9
29
a
33
BERNARD LEE SHORT
140.06 L.F.C.G.E PVMT.
19.50
7,731.17
.
. 507 S LIBERTY
'-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
b
VICTORIA, TX 77901
1,.06' X 200'
0
700.30 S.F. S/W
-0- $,,..E, S/W
1.00 -.
-0-
700.30
-0-
f3
"
JUANITA NELL SHORT TR
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
x
I-2, PHIL OILFIELD
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
as
4.
3
1
► RV CF
uIDC :'•_ SF
PViLL.
19.50
J,910 Q0
,,
C/O ROY A BUSBY E CO
_]OQ..0-1-.,E•C•,Ss..£
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
-0-
-0-
13103 PRESTON RD
317.81 S.F. S/W
1.00
317.81
SUITE 710
-0- S.F
-1-
-�-
a
DALLAS, TX 75240
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
u
b
-
MIDCAP REALTY CO TRACT
1.-7.2-, I. ..
-0-..S.F. D/W
-0-
-
-0-
.
.
3,553.
35
CANTWELL PROPERTIES
100.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
1,950.00
it
PO BOX 4067 78408
-0- L.F.C.G.& PVMT.'
-0-•
.
LOT "'SLK 3 - ' -
1j.81 S.E. SL1L.
1 o
312.._8J
y
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
-n- s F fl/w
-n-
-0-
3,553.
le
9
36
DONALD G HEASLEY
100.00 L.F.C.G.E PVMT.
19.50
1,950.00
w
RT 1, BOX 187C
-0- ' L.F.C.G.6 PVMT.
-0-
-0-
ROBSTOWN. TX 70380
741 71 S F S/W_
1.00
741.3]
5=
LOT 2 -
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-P
-0-
53
DICKENSON ADDITION
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75-
-
,1
. T-7, C.C. TRACK SUPPI Y
191 .97 S.F .]/_W 120F30
7.$7
641-3.
- •
5
4,018.
50
•
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
nFCrRTPTTnN
PAGE 9
TOTAL
ITEM
NO.
- OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY ' OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
•- AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
37
MFRCANTTLF NATInNAI RANK
1'an_n0 1 F_r_(;_F. PVMT-
19_Rin
2,975_00
PO BOX 991
* 10.00 L.F.C.G.C. PVMT.
19.50
195.00
KINGSVILLE, TX 78363
643.90 S.F. S/W
1.00
643.90
1 OT 1
' -0- S/.. __,
-0- •
-0-
DICKENSON ADDITION
_ ..E..
263.97 S.F. D/W 180F30
2.82
744.40
I-2, BEKINS STORAGE WHSE
-0- S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
*RTN OMAHA nR
4,508.
OMAHA DRIVE INTERSECTION
38
JOSEPH L SHEINBERG ET UX .
190.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
19.50
3,705.00
249 CIRCLE DR 78411
* 5.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
19.50
97.50
I OTCC 15 R 1F 16•_,_LK 2
767.81 S-E..._S/_W
1..0.0
767_R1
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
I-2, SHEINBERG TOOLS
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C
2.82
1,285.75
*RTN OMAHA nR -
-0- S -F- D/W
-0-
-0-
5,856.
39
SOUTHERN ENGINE 6 PUMP CO
99.50 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
19.50
1,940.25
PO BOX 4206 78408
-0- L.F.C.G.6 PVMT.
-0-
-0-
411_40 S_F-..S_W
1 00
411.40
LOT 14 BLK 2 .-
-0- S.F. S/W
. -0-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
•215.97 S.F. D/W 140F35
2.82
609.04
T_2_, cFPrn
-0- S.F nim
'-0-
-0-
2,960.
40
APPLIED POWER 6 EQUIP
100.00 L.F.C.G.& PVMT.
19.50
1,950.00
-
C/0 W.C. DVORAK, PRES
-0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
-0-
-0-
ROX 4158 78,6,9
78 9O C_F- S/W
1..DA
378,._4.0
LOT13 BLK 2
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
299.97 S.F. D/W 210F35
2.82
845.92
T_2 1
-1- 1
-1-
_-,-
3,174.
41
NUECES FOUNDRY INC
100.00 L.F.C.G.C. PVMT.
19.50
1,950.00
C/0 LOUISE N. VANDERBILT
-0- L.F.C.G.0 PVMT.
-0-
-0-
e
ROX 4148 7R40R
5130 00 S F- S/W
1.«0-0
5a0 00
LOT 12A,BLK 2
-0- S.F. S/W
-0-
-0-
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
-0- '• S.F. D/W
-0-
-0-
T-?
-O--S..E.-D/W
-0-
-0-
2,450.
NOVEMBER 30, 1983
•
PAGE 10
nFSCRTPTTON
TDTAI
ITEM
NO.
,OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT ° RATE AMOUNT
-AMOUNT
ASSESSED,
A ■k u ■
C/0 WILLIAM H CARNEY"
PO BOX 4188 78408 m
LOTS 11 F. 1?t11 K 7
• u 305.48
* ` 23.00 L.F.C.G.6 PVMT. 19.50 448.50
665.36`S.F. S/W1.00 665.36
-0- S_F_ S/W -n- -n-
5,705.4
S.
RUSSELL INDUSTRIAL DIST
I-2, MFG CO
*RTN ON CANTWELL DB
455.94 S.F. D/W 1-30C 2.82 1,285.75
-0- S.F. D/W -0- -0-
B
43
DIVERSIFIED STRUCTURES
C/0 HECTOR 0. HEINJOSA VP
5729 LEOPARD 78408
1,010.55 L.F.C.G.C. PVMT. 19.50 19,705.73
* 10.00 L.F.C.G.0 PVMT. 19.50 195.00
4.638. 17 S.F. S/W x.00 4,63R.3.�.
r
LOTS 1, 2, 20, 21, 22 6 23
SHAW INDUSTRIAL TRACTS
T-7, GENTRY CUPPLY
-0- S.F. S/W -0- -0-
515.94 S.F. D/W 1-35C 2.82, 1,454.95
515.94 C F. 5)/W 1-15C ' 7 R?- 1,454..95
27,449.Q
*RTN CANTWELL DR
o
LEOPARD STREET
END RAI DILIEB VD
-
_
END EAST SIDE
END PROJECT
,
u
-
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ***
`
320,084.4,
d
-
e
i ,,
•
3
n
.
i
SECTION 4. Be it further ordained that in the event the actual
frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of
said improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet hereinabove
stated, the assessments herein set against any such property and against the
real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be, and the same are hereby
declared to be increased or decreased as the case may be, in the proportion
which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall bear to the whole number of
front feet of property actually improved in accordance with the front foot rule
or rate of assessment herein adopted, it being the intention that such parcel of
property and the real and true owner or owners thereof abutting on the portion
of the streets above described, within the limits defined, shall pay for said
improvements under the "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN", which rule or plan is hereby
found and determined to be just and equitable and to produce a substantial
equality, having in view the special benefits to be received and the burdens
imposed thereby; and it is further ordained that upon final completion and
acceptance of said improvements on the aforesaid streets, within the limits
defined all certificates hereinafter provided for, issued to evidence said
assessments against said parcels of property abutting upon said street, and the
real and true owner or owners thereof shall be issued in accordance with, and
shall evidence the actual frontage of said property and the actual cost of said
improvements, the amount named in said certificate in no case to exceed the
amount herein assessed against such property unless such increase be caused by
an excess of front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost
and such actual number of front feet, if different from the hereinabove shown in
Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the City Engineer upon completion of said
work on said street, and the findings of the City Engineer shall be final and
binding upon all parties concerned.
SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof
assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the aforesaid streets,
within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof, whether named
or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of Section 4
thereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per
annum with reasonable attorney's fee and all costs and expenses of collection,
if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a first and prior lien upon the
respective parcels of property, against which same are assessed from and after
the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit:
October 12, 1983, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true
owner or owners be named or correctly named herein, and that said lien shall be
and constitute the first and prior enforceable claim against the property
assessed and shall be a first and paramount lien superior to all other liens,
claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem taxes; and that the same so
assessed shall be paid and become payable in one of the following methods at the
option of the property owner:
1. All in cash within 30 days after completion or
acceptance by City; or
2. Payments to be made in maximum of 120 equal
installments, the first of which shall be paid within 30
days after the completion of said improvement, and the
acceptance thereof by the City, and the balance to be
paid in 59 equal consecutive monthly installments
commencing an the 1st day of the next succeeding month
until the entire sum is paid in full, together with
interest from the date of said completion and acceptance
by the City, until paid, at the rate of eight percent
(8%) per annum; provided, however, that the owners of
said property availing themselves of Option "2" or "3"
above shall have the privilege of paying one, or all, of
such installments at any time before maturity thereof by
paying the total amount of principal due, together with
interest accrued, to the date of payment.
3. The total number of monthly installments on owner
occupied property may be extended beyond 120 in number so
that, at the owner's request, the total monthly payments
will not exceed ten ($10.00) per month.
SECTION 6. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments, the
liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels or
property and the real and true owner or owners thereof and the time and terms of
payment, and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable certificates shall be
issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to itself upon the completion of
said improvements in said streets and acceptance thereof by said City Council,
which certificates shall be executed by the Mayor in the name of the City,
attested by the City Secretary, with the corporate seal of said City, and which
certificates shall declare the amounts of said assessments and the times and
terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon, the date of the completion and
acceptance of the improvements for which the certificate is issued, and shall
contain the names of the apparent true owner or owners as accurately as
possible, and the description of the property assessed by lot and block number,
or front foot thereof, or such other description as may otherwise identify the
same, and if the said property shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so
state the fact shall be sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such
property or in giving the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in
anywise invalidate or impair the assessment levied hereby' or the certificate
issued in evidence thereof.
That said certificate shall further provide substantially that if
default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or interest
when due, then at the option of the City, its successors, or assigns, or the
holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidence thereby shall at once
become due and payable, and shall be collectible with reasonable attorney's fees
and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and said certificate
shall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the real and true owner
or owners of such property, and that said lien is first and paramount thereon,
superior to all other liens, titles and charges, except for lawful ad valorem
taxes, from and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City
Council, to -wit: October 12, 1983, and shall provide in effect that if default
shall be made in the payment thereof, the same may be enforced, at the option of
the City, or their successors and assigns, by the sale of the property therein
described in the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above
recited, or by suit in any court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all the
proceedings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly had
in compliance with the law and Charter in force in said City and the proceedings
of said City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of
the assessment lien against the property therein described, or attempted to be
described, and the personal liability of the real and true owner or owners
thereof, evidence by such certificates, have been regularly done and performed,
which recitals shall be evidence of all the matters and facts so recited and no
further proof thereof shall be required in any court.
That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, in the
enforcement and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain other and
further recitals, pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall not be necessary
that said certificates shall be in the exact form as above set forth, but the
substance and effect thereof shall suffice.
SECTION 7. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability
and charge against the real and true owner or owners of the property described,
or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not be
named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the name of the property
owner, or the description of any property or the amount of any assessment, or in
any other matter or thing shall not in anywise invalidate or impair any
assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued, and such mistake, or error,
invalidity or irregularity whether in such assessment or in the certificate
issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not required to be, to be
enforceable, at any time corrected by the said City Council of the City of
Corpus Christi. Further that the omission of said improvements in front of any
part of parcel of property abutting upon the aforementioned streets, which is
exempt from the lien of said assessment, shall in no wise affect or impair the
validity of assessments against the other parcels of property abutting upon said
street; and that the total amounts assessed against the respective parcels of
property abutting upon said streets within the limits herein defined and the
real and true owner or owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the
estimate of said assessment prepared by the City Engineer and approved and
adopted by the City Council and are in accordance with the procedures of said
City Council relative to said improvements and assessments thereof, and with the
terms, powers and provisions of said Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called
Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known as Article 1105b of
Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas and Charter of the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, under which terms, power and provisions said proceedings, said
improvements and assessments were had and made by said City Council.
SECTION 8. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council
members, copy attached, to find and declare an emergency due to the need for
efficient administration of City affairs by the closing of such hearing on
public street improvements, such finding of an emergency is made and declared
requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon
ordinances or resolutions at three regular meetings so that this ordinance is
passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this
the 1st day of December, 1983.
ATTEST:
Secretary 42J2
e
wxVED:
cDAY OF
Iv /Y
,19g3 :
B: Brue� Aycock, ty Attorney
♦ Off
Or THE CITY OF ORRIS CHRISTI, TEXAS
MAYOR
Corpus Christi, Texas /
day of CMCJ , 1983
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance
or resolution, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule
as to consideration and voting upon ordinances or resolutions at three
regular meetings; I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule
and pass this ordinance or resolution finally on the date it is introduced,
or at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully, Respectfully,
Council Members
4/7
MAYOR
THE CITY 0 'CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
The above ordinance was passed: y the following vote:
Luther Jones
Betty N. Turner
David Berlanga,,Sr.
Leo Guerrero
Herbert L. Hawkins, Jr.
Dr. Charles W. Kennedy
Joe McComb
Frank Mendez
Mary Pat Slavik
17951