Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19975 ORD - 09/15/1987AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SECTION 1. That there is hereby adopted the London Area Development Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, a substantial copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, marked Exhibit A. 08P.006.01 19975 MICROFILMED LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN July 1987 City of Corpus Christi Planning Department Larry H. Wenger, Director Bob Payne, Senior Planner Fernando Rodriguez, Planner II Pam Kling, Planning Technician II Erma Ramirez, Secretary i PREFACE Planning is a continuous process: a process that is continuous in nature and one that requires periodic revaluation as new ideas or information becomes available. In fact, because planning by its nature is forward looking, the act of planning is always carried out with inadequate information. Lack of informa- tion does not suggest that planning should not be undertaken, rather it simply points to the necessity of revaluation as more information becomes available. With this in mind the scope of this general plan shall include discussion and recommendations concerning topics where more information would have been help- ful. The plan will serve to highlight these areas where more research is warranted and challenge City staff to explore these areas. In the meantime, the guiding principal of our planning efforts must not be, "not to plan until more information is available", as this would paralyze the act of planning and not serve the public interest. Rather, the guiding princi- pal must be to plan, and then re-evaluate approved plans as the Planning Commis- sion or City Council feels it is appropriate. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION I-1 The Elements of the Comprehensive Plan I-1 Planning Process for the London Area I-2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS II -1 Natural Features II -1 Topography II -1 Drainage/Floodways II -1 Soils II -3 Environmentally Sensitive Areas II -7 Housing and Population II -8 Land Use/Zoning (also prezoning) II -8 Community Facilities II -11 Fire Protection II -11 Parks and Recreational Facilities II -11 Water and Sewer 1I-13 Transportation II -17 Airports 11-20 Other Topics - Chapman Ranch II -22 III. ANALYSIS III -1 The Relationship of the London Area Plan to the Comprehensive Policy Statements III -1 Problems and Issues: Constraints to Development II1-9 IV. RECOMMEENDATIONS IV -1 V. APPENDIX A-1 A. Planning Process Flow Chart A-2 I-1 I. INTRODUCTION The Elements of the Comprehensive Plan The City's Comprehensive Plan consists of three elements. The first is the City's Comprehensive Policy Statements which describe the goals, objectives, and policies for the entire community. The purpose of these statements is to establish a general framework by which the City can consider developmental decisions. The policy statements, moreover, address issues for protection of neighborhoods, the environment, promote economic development and provision of public services. The second element is the City's Area Development Plans. Currently, twelve geographic areas consisting of land inside and outside the city limits, have been recommended for study. The plans developed for these areas will bridge the gap between the broad -range policies, found in the comprehensive policy state- ments, and the actual zoning and development of property. The area plans will also be used to zone and plat land in a manner that will be beneficial to the general public, and they will enable City Staff to plan more effectively for future services of.residential, commercial, and industrial areas recommended for development. The third element of the Comprehensive Plan is the citywide service master plans. These deal with the technical aspects of service delivery such as the specific location of wastewater plants, sewer lines, and water mains. Moreover, since planning is a continuous process, this element, as well as the other two, must be re-evaluated periodically as more information become available and/or community attitudes change. I-2 , Planning Process for the London Area A planning process has been adopted by the Planning Commission for the construction of area development plans (see Appendix A). This process was used as a guideline for the London Area Development Plan. A map of the study area is displayed on page 1-4. The study area is bounded on the north by Oso Creek; on the southeast by Cayo Del Oso and the King Ranch; on the south-southwest by County Road 18, State Highway 286, and F.M. 2444; and on the west by County Road 49, F.M. 43 and 763. After the study area's boundaries were identified, the Planning Staff collected data on the existing conditions in the London Area; base maps were drawn; property ownerships were identified; and a draft report on the existing condition was developed. In addition, a discussion of the developmental issues was drafted and future land use alternative maps were constructed. It is important to note that when the London Area Study was initiated, the policy statements had not been adopted by the City Council. For this reason, the planning process for the London Area has taken longer than normally required, as indicated in the appendix. In brief, the planning process was initiated in October 1986 to facilitate the City Council's request to study the area with the prezoning case 886-2T. By January 1987, the Planning Commission had reviewed a draft of the existing conditions and alternative land use maps. Instead of proceeding with the public hearings, the Commission forwarded its recommendation (to City Council) that additional work on the London Area be postponed until the Policy Statements were adopted. Once the Policy Statements were adopted by the Planning Commission on May 27, 1987, the Planning Commission held public hearings to receive recommenda- tions, concerning the alternative land use maps, from interested landowners and 1-3 citizens. With the recommendations in hand, the Planning Staff revised the maps and resubmitted them to the Planning Commission for further review and adoption. After review, the Planning Commission recommended a future land use plan to the City Council. • LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Natural Features Topography - Figure 2 (page I-2) illustrates that the local relief of the study area is generally flat to gently rolling and that most of the relief is found along the banks of Oso Creek. As the illustration depicts, the highest contour of 35 feet is found near the western boundary of the study area while the lowest contour of 5 feet is found along Oso Creek. This means that the contour values increase from the northeast to southwest, indicating a rise in elevation toward the southwest. Drainage/Floodways - Figure 2 (page I-2) also displays the natural drainage of the study area. The figure shows that Oso Creek serves as the major drainage system of the area and that two small tributaries flow into Oso Creek. The first tributary parallels County Road 20A and intersects Oso Creek north of S.H. 2444. This tributary drains a relatively small area while the second tributary drains a larger area, the southern portion of the study area, and intersects Oso Creek south of the Botanical Gardens. The illustration also depicts the floodway boundary of Oso Creek. The floodway is the area where floodwaters will flow in times of flood. The floodway must be kept free of urban encroachment to accommodate floodwaters without substantial impediments to flood flows. Areas adjacent to the floodway, the floodway fringe, will contain pools of water and areas of inundation but will not usually contain swift floodway water. Although the City does not allow development to occur within the floodway, it does permit development within the 100 -year boundary as long as three criteria are met. The first requires developers to identify the 100 -year flood boundary on their property and corresponding plats; the second requires N LEGEND CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN .11°9P,' RA PHIL Su 0 900 .600 Bl 99 ./r nie a c.ei ° • Mia°° H II -3 developers to construct structures that meet City building codes for flood -prone areas; and the third requires proof (from developers) that a new development will not raise flood water surface elevations an additional one foot. Moreover, since the three criteria are based on guidelines established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Insurance Administration, strict adherence to the guidelines is essential to qualify developers or homeowners for flood insurance. Soils, General - Soil characteristics are important indicators of limita- tions to development. The following discussion focuses on areas where soils are generally favorable for development, and, conversely, on areas where soils are not favorable for development. Figure 3 (II -4) illustrates that the London Area is dominated by Victoria clays, also known as the blacksoils of the coastal plains. These clays are characterized by low -permeability (poor drainage), high-water holding capacity, and low to moderate compressibility. In addition, Figure 3 also illustrates areas that are dominated by clay sand and silt. These soils have moderate permeability and drainage, moderate water -holding capacity, and low to moderate compressibility. Soils, Suitability Index for Construction - Figure 4 (II -5) shows areas where development, based on soil suitability, is favorable or unfavorable, as defined by the Nueces County Soil Conservation Service. The factors considered in constructing the soil suitability index for development were flood hazard, shrink -swell potential, water -holding capacity, permeability, and local relief. The map breaks the soils into the following categories: I. Low to Moderate Limitations to Development These soils have a few limitations that could cause problems during or after construction. Some of the limitations such as ponding or minor 2 Cj] LEGEND Ba - BANOUaT6 CLAY CCA- CLARE.YILLE COMPLEX, 0_1% SLOPES SLoPCS GV-GYLLIEG LANDS, SALINE LO LoMALTA CLAY OF- ORELIA Fluff SA,avY LOAM O-1 VGA- VICTORIA CLAY, i `/o VCB- Vial -0.21A CLAY, 1-3 `/e SLOPES Vd2-VICTORIA CLAY, Ertovev V1: - VICTORIA CLAY, Low CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI • LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN C7aIle.KAL S, lo Y. 4,,. • 0 L77 1-111 411 [1,01.1, 110 Si ore, r• .4441 z LEGEND • • - LoW MovEKATE - N't 0 L7ERATE To sevER.s - S8VE1E CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN LIMITATIONS toEVELoPMEI4 0 800 .00 MOO ham, 13.01 Hat 20,06 0 y, II -6 flooding can be overcome easily, but one or more problems could be difficult or expensive to correct. Soils in this category may have a moderate shrink -swell potential or moderately slow permeability. These problems can be overcome, in part, by increasing strengths in structures. Figure 4 (II -5) illustrates that these types of soils are located, primari- ly, along the drainage ditch traversing the southern limits of the study area. These soils have low to moderate limitations for development due to their moderate water -holding capacity, permeability; low to moderate compressibility, and shrink -swell potential. Unfortunately, the soils that are most suitable for development cover a small portion of the study area and are found in areas quite remote from existing developments. II. Moderate to Severe Limitations to Development These soils have two or more limitations which are severe, and these limitations are difficult or expensive to overcome. Soils that have moderate to severe limitations for development are found throughout the central portion of the study area. These soils, the Victoria Clays, are widely distributed and form the largest group of soils (figure 4). "Generally speaking, these soils are moderately suited for residential development and poorly suited for commercial or industrial development. III. Severe Limitations to Development These soils have several severe limitations. They may be subject to flooding, low water -holding capacity, and high shrink -swell potential. The difficulty and expense of developing on these soils are high. Soils that are least suited for all types of development are found along the southern banks of Oso Creek. These soils are unsuitable because they II -7 are subject to occasional flooding and they consist of wetlands and tidal marshes that border Oso Creek. Soils, Suitability for Wastewater Disposal Sites - The soil suitability for on-site waste disposal systems, especially septic tanks, is ranked primarily on these factors: soil permeability, water retention, and flooding susceptibility. Soils that flood frequently, percolate slowly, or have high water -holding capacity are not suited for sewage disposal. Most of the study area contains soils that are rated poor or least suitable for wastewater disposal sites. As with other land use activities reviewed previously, the Victoria Clays, which typify the area, constitute a major impediment to septic tank use. Environmentally sensitive areas - The northern boundary of the study area abuts approximately 10 miles of the Oso Creek and Cayo del"Oso. The Texas Natural Area Survey update completed in the early 1980s identified the Oso as one of the State's most significant urban natural areas. In addition, the Coastal Bend Council of Governments (CBCOG) adopted a resolution in 1983 sup- porting the dedication of land for open space along the Oso. The Oso contains a unique wetland environment. A great variety of vege- tation and wildlife can be found in the area. Ebony, mesquite, live oak, sweet acacia, and numerous grasses are found along the Oso. Deer, javelina, raccoons, and many varieties of song birds inhabit the Oso Area. In an effort to highlight the natural beauty of the area and provide a valuable tourist attraction to the community, the Corpus Christi Botanical Society has identified a botanical garden site along the Oso. The proposed site for the Botanical Garden is within the London study area and is generally located south of Staples Street and adjacent to the Oso. A preliminary concept plan is displayed on figure 5 (page II -9). Once the botanical garden is con- structed, it will include formal gardens, scenic trails and nature walks, a II -8 Mexican colonial style visitor center, a nature interpretive center, research center and amphitheatre. Development of these facilities will have the potential to greatly benefit the entire community. As a major future community resource (the botanical gardens) to be located on the Oso, the City has an important environmental and economic interest in preserving the Oso Creek/Cayo del Oso Area. Housing and Population Developmental Characteristics - The study area is a large, rural area of approximately 18 square miles (11,579 acres). Most of the land is in agricul- tural use and isolated farmsteads dot the countryside. The only sizeable, rural development is around London School. There are 14 single-family dwellings and one mobile home within the vicinity of the school. Population Estimates - The population estimate for the study area is approximately 105 individuals (Table 1). This figure is estimated by multiply- ing the number of occupied single-family units (41) by 2.56 persons per house- hold (household size based on Census Tract 54, 1980 Census). Table 1 Housing Data 1. Number of Persons Per Household = 2.56 (1980 Census) 2. Number of Single-family Dwellings = 43 3. Number of Vacant Households = 2 4. Number of Single-family Dwellings in Use = 41 Land Use/Zoning Table 3 (page II -11) illustrates the land use activities in the study area. As the table indicates, the area contains 11,579 acres or 18 square miles. Most of the land (11,450 acres) is utilized for agriculture and a few oil -related activities while the remaining 129 acres are utilized for other uses. This 11-9 FIGURE 5 II -10 means that 99 percent is in agricultural or oil extraction/storage use, and 1 percent is in other land use activities. An existing land use map is provided on figure 6 (page II -12). Of the 1 percent, approximately 100 acres are utilized for single-family dwellings. The area has 40 units and each unit contains, on the average, approximately 2.5 acres per lot. In addition, there are two mobile homes; and each contains about 1.67 acres per lot. The study area contains only six commercial uses, and each contains approximately 1.97 acres per lot, a total of 9.85 acres. Three of the five are located in the London School Area. They include: a dentist office, Sally -Mac, Inc. Storage Co., and London Gin & Elevator Cooperative. The other two are located elsewhere. A dental laboratory is located on Weber Road (F.M. 43) midway between S.H. 286 and Oso Creek. A Conoco Gas Station and a butane service center are located at the intersection of S.H. 286 and F.M. 43. There are two public/semi-public uses in the study area. The first use is the London School which encompasses 4 acres. The second public/semi-public activity is a storage shed near the future site of the Botanical Gardens. Although the structure occupies a small area, the site will eventually be landscaped to accommodate modern facilities and a park -like environment that will ultimately cover 111 acres along the southeastern corner of the study area, adjacent to Oso Creek. Table 3 Existing Land Uses Average Total Acreage/ Average Type Units Unit Acreage Single-family 40 2.50 100 Mobile Homes 2 2.00 4 Commercial 5 N/A 10 Public/Semi-Public 2 N/A 5 Light Industrial 1 5.00 10 49 129 Sub Total Agriculture - - 11,450 49 - 11,579 Grand Total Community Facilities Fire Protection - The study area does not contain any fire stations and must rely on the City for fire protection. Since the area is outside the present City limits, the residents must pay a service charge if a fire emergency occurs and the City Fire Department is called to provide service. Fire Station 6, located near the intersection of Saratoga Blvd. and Weber Street, is approxi- mately 1 mile away and would most likely respond in case of an emergency. Parks and Recreation - There are not any parks within the London area. The closest existing City parks are almost a mile away. However, three proposed community parks have been recommended for development within the study area and along the Oso (figure 7, page II -14). Two of these proposed community parks are O. CC it KING RANCHI"I' v LEGEND S..IGLE FARM DwELL11JG MoalLa Home J(SEMI PUBLIC PiUILDI 14 ❑CULTIVATED LAUD ® COMMERICAL • U41T INVUS-rRIAL ▪ 13OTAN I GAL C7ARfl6NS SCfE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAW D USE re.mos six 1..2 itafi II -13 located north of the study area on either side of Chapman Ranch Road. The third community park is to be located on the south side of Oso Creek and just north of Staples Street. These proposed community parks contain a total of 468 acres. The community park proposed for development west of Chapman Ranch Road and north of the Creek is currently part of the City's landfill. Once the landfill is terminated, the City plans to convert it into a community park. However, since the City must allow the landfill enough time to become environmentally safe for public use, the park will take a number of years to develop. In addition to these parks, the botanical gardens will be located in a 111 -acre tract of land south of Staples Street. As part of this development, a neighborhood park has been proposed (figure 5, page II -9). Water and Sewer - The City now provides water to a limited number of residents in the study area (Figure 8, page II -15). The waterlines are private- ly owned and were installed at the request and expense of the property owners. Unfortunately, the diameter of the mains are small in comparison to those required by the City. The largest mains are 3-1/2 inches in diameter while the smallest mains are 2-1/2 inches. By comparison, the City requires waterlines that have a minimum of 8 inches in diameter to support fire protection services. Only two small sections of study area 11 are served by these water lines. The first is the London School area. A 3-1/2 inch line extends from Old Brownsville Road along F.M. 763 to the intersection of F.M. 43. From this intersection, the waterline extends easterly along F.M. 43 to a point east of the London School area. At the school junction, a waterline spur extends northward along F.M. 33 and serves the school and a few homes along the road. The second waterline extends from the City limits along S.H. 268 to the intersection of F.M. 2444. This line extends westerly along F.M. 2444 to a II -14 point west of County Road 49. Except for this spur, all other lines extend east toward Oso Creek. With respect to sewer service, the City has not extended service to the study area. For this reason, all residents utilize septic tanks. However, this type of master disposal system is not recommended for the area because of low soil permeability. Consequently, before more development occurs, the City Council must approve a wastewater plan that will service the entire area and, in the process, elimi- nate the usage of septic tanks. The need to adopt a plan has taken a sense of urgency due to the encroachment of residential developments along Oso Creek. If development occurs south of the Oso prior to the adoption of a wastewa- ter plan, developers would have three alternatives. The first is to construct a lift station at their own expense. The lift station would pump wastewater into the existing Oso Wastewater System and operate until the City extends wastewater service to the study area. The second alternative would be to construct a package plant in an area south of Oso Creek. The third alternative would be to construct septic tanks for single-family dwellings. Use of septic systems for multi -family, commercial, and industrial activities would not be appropriate due to the potential for pollution and due to the poor soil suitability for septic tanks in the area. The City Council commissioned a consulting firm in 1984 to develop alterna- tives for the provision of wastewater services (major trunk system only) to the City and surrounding areas through the year 2025. The firm evaluated six alternatives and selected one of the six as the most appropriate for Corpus Christi (Figure 9, page II -18). The alternative included the addition of a new Southside Wastewater Plant, improvements to the Oso Plan, +k FLAWNING iNG C 'MM1S- 61aN ANO THS PA21cs 13oAtxo PROPAL LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN PARK WAYS 0 000 .400 SV 0 N H LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN W ATEJZ L7' I si" IZ I 31.1T I1-17 and expansion of the Westside Plant to handle current and projected wastewater levels. i, The consulting firm also suggested that the Oso Plant be modified to increase its capacity from 16 million to 23 million gallons per day; and when the plant reaches a capacity of 19 MGD, work should begin to build the new Southside Plant. Based on growth projections, the firm expects the Oso Plant to reach 19 MGD by 1995. Anticipated flows from the southside plant will come from a large area south of Oso Creek as well as an area between Staples, the Cayo del Oso, Holly, and Oso Creek. A new pump station is also proposed along Oso Creek (Figure 9). This station will pump flows from the Southside, including the study area, to the Oso Plant until the new plant is constructed. Once the Southside plant has been constructed, flows will be diverted to the new treatment plant. Transportation - The study area contains a grid pattern of roads (Figure 10, page II -19). The road system is characterized as a rural system without any "urban subdivision" composed of local and collector streets. There are a total of 18.91 miles of two-lane paved roads, 3.17 miles of one -lane paved roads, and 14.05 miles of one -lane unpaved roads. Specifically, County Roads 18, 20A, 47, and 49 are partially paved; and they are all one -lane roads. County Roads 33, 41, 41A, 43, and 22 (east of S.H. 286 and just north of County Road 20A) are one -lane unpaved roads while the remaining roads are all two-lane paved roads. Only two roads extend from the study area to other cities: They are S.H. 43 and 286. The former extend to Petronila, Texas, approximately 21 miles from the study area, and eventually to Driscoll, Texas; while the latter extend to Chapman Ranch, approximately 10 miles south of the study area, and eventually to Bishop, Texas. aci 1 N 0 0 <060/11110 Iz" LEGEND -- pEtopcsao (A2ALLEL Cy IZAVITY LINE • SEWamm LINE biome • PizaPo ED I�IeW R Mp SYATIO.4 :outg:outgo. : 198z o. WES75.DE. WASTBWATCI MASTER FLAu PRcposAL C K16T Aooprao f -r C u.0L� CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN rEapOSED01 SwWelr iREcoMMENDeo 1 000 1000 3i. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA •• DEVELOPMENT PLAN' TICAHSPogTATI NETW oRK un n. .o.n II -20 The extension of the Crosstown Expressway into the study area should occur during the 1990s. As this road is built, it should have a dramatic impact on development of the area. Airports - There is one military air -training installation, Cabaniss Field, adjacent to study area 11. Since the installation was constructed prior to pressures from urban development, no restrictions were adopted to limit urban encroachment. However, the City has purchased property around the airport to control development and land use studies have been undertaken to suggest methods for promoting compatible development. In 1980 the Navy designated Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) adjacent to Cabaniss Field. These zones identify crash hazard areas and provide a recommendation from the Navy to the City concerning future land use. Adher- ence to the Navy recommendations are intended to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Three of these zones are located at the end of the Cabaniss north -south runway which extends into the London study area (figure 11, page II -21). These zones are described below: A. The Clear Zone (CZ), located at the end of the runway recommends that no development occur; B. Accident Potential Zone I (APZ-1) identifies an area where there is significant potential for accidents. APZ-1 restrictions on develop- ment include the recommendations that no residential development be allowed and only commercial or industrial developments that will not cause the congregation or large groups of people; and, C. Accident Potential Zone II (APZ-2) identifies an area of measurable accident potential. APZ-2 restrictions on development include rec- ommendations to limit residential development to 2 units per acre and 11 allf1DIal LEGEND • • MI CZ HIC046ST Ada kott-11. Po -r ENT IAL Wo Deve.t.oPMENT. C°AmcAe.A4toPeRZE.t.t--ric:PsSeZeniTrmii:Alt..",7 Te DeVELoPM I=1 APZ-Z - MeAsu.e.wav • P.t.41- IqL1 FIGANT CoUsTRIANTS To C,EVE.LopINEArr. LONDON AREA .. • DEVELOPMENT PLAN CAe,Anliss FIEL A ICUZ AREAS o eoo MAD WOO • ° 11 • anal OOP. Ma r II -22 commercial or industrial developments that will not cause the congregation of large groups of people. Other Topics The Chapman Ranch Plan - Since the London study area is in between the existing City limits and the Chapman Ranch, it is critically important to reconsider recommendations for the Chapman Ranch in light of recommendations for the London area. For these reasons, a summary of the Chapman Ranch Plan is provided. Chapman Ranch Plan Background - In June 1985, the City Council approved a contract with Shell Management, Inc. (owners of the Chapman Ranch) to provide planning studies related to Chapman Ranch. Subsequently, Shell Management hired the consulting firms of Brown and Caldwell, and Freese and Nichols, Inc. to develop a conceptual plan for distribution of services to the Chapman Ranch. The Ranch contains approximately 34,000 acres, with only a small portion within the City's 5 -mile extra -territorial jurisdiction. Due to the size of the Ranch and the potential population associated with development of the area, it is likely that the Ranch will have a substantial impact on the City's future transportation and infrastructure development. Chapman Ranch Plan, Water - Since the size of the Ranch includes approxi- mately 34,000 acres, at full development, the Ranch area could include as many as 100,000 people. In order to serve this large population, the plan suggests that the area be served by City of Corpus Christi water. Several alternatives to Corpus Christi water are considered, but they are ruled out as too expensive. These alternatives include on-site ground water, supply of water from existing or proposed reservoirs and supply of water from nearby Kingsville. The plan suggests that two large water mains be extended from the Corpus Christi system. Several pump stations and storage tanks are also recommended. 11-23 The City adopted a water service plan in 1982. The plan does not specif- ically recommend any waterlines within the Chapman Ranch area. However, several lines are proposed for the area north of Chapman Ranch with the London area. The proposed lines in the 1982 plan and those recommended in the Chapman Ranch Plan are displayed on figure 12 (page II -24). It is important to note that the 1982 plan specifies lines that would be of insufficient size to tie onto the proposed Chapman Ranch water lines. It is also important to note that the closest point of connection between the proposed lines in the 1982 Water Plan would still be more than a mile from the Chapman Ranch property. For these reasons, the 1982 plan must be amended to incorporate the needs of the Chapman Ranch area. Chapman Ranch Plan, Wastewater - The Chapman Ranch Plan proposes that a temporary "package" treatment plant be constructed to serve the initial develop- ment phases. The plant location is proposed for an area northeast of the Chapman Ranch and southeast of the London area as displayed on figure 12 (page 26). The proposed southside wastewater treatment plan is proposed as a long- term solution to the Chapman Ranch wastewater needs. As an alternative to the eventual connection onto the proposed southside plant, the plan suggests that the City may wish to participate in the develop- ment of a package plant with the intent to eventually convert the plant to another conventional wastewater treatment facility. As illustrated on figure 11, the Chapman Ranch Plan also indicates the need for seven pump stations. Additional recommendations include the possible installation of "small" wastewater lines initially with a planned replacement program to larger lines during the latter development stages. Chapman Ranch Plan, Natural Gas - Although the Chapman Ranch Development Plan does not discuss a natural gas distribution system for the area, the City K C O jt / u s /1 7 70 . CO. i LEGEND N Exte rlN4 E%PRE sn WAY'S` M PRoF,•sEO Expaesee. W AYS ST'4pY ARH4 11 Bo.NPAR`i "•••••*-^ PRopesc.G WATER DIST. SYSTEM PRoPoSGo WASTE- WATER Limas ▪ FR.Po•SEa WASTE- WATER LIPI- SYATIOdS • PROPesED 14A5TE- WAT4R PAck.A4E PLANT Arnac%IMATE CHAPMAN RANCH PSoJNOARY Sou4.ta 1982 LJAT6R 17,1s-rmi9YT1oN MASTER PAN ANo THE. 198 La CHAPMAN RANG11 - MASTER PLAN CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN CNAPMANF 1 A PPM, Dep. H II -25 may need to incorporate this planning aspect in projecting long-range planning needs for the area south of Oso Creek. Presently, the City is committed to purchase its gas supply from Valero Corporation through 1993. Valero has a high pressure transmission main adjacent to Chapman Ranch. If the City decides to provide natural gas to the Chapman Ranch area, a purchase point and regulator station could be planned to avoid costly duplication. Moreover, while the Ranch becomes fully developed, the City could plan to locate large -diameter transmission lines and regulator stations throughout the Ranch. Chapman Ranch Plan, Transportation - A number of major improvements are proposed, however, only one of these improvements would traverse the London area: extension of the Crosstown Expressway. The Crosstown Expressway is recommended for extension south through the London and Chapman Ranch areas. Another major recommendation is the development of a beltway around the metropolitan area. This recommendation has implications for the London area, however, it does not specifically affect any property within the London area. III, ANALYSIS The Relationship of the London Area Plan to the Comprehensive Policy Statements As part of the area development planning process three future land use sketch maps were developed (see pages III -2 through III -7). These maps were drawn with the Policy Statements in mind so that all land use activities within the area would comply with the policies yet provide various features, in terms of land use, park locations, roadway configuration, etc. As discussed in the following paragraphs, the Policy Statements have had a major impact on the location of commercial activities, the proposed street system, activities to be located adjacent to air installation compatible use zone (AICUZ), the need to preserve environmentally sensitive areas and the need to promote economic development. To accomplish this goal, large commercial centers were located at major intersections to allow customer accessibility and to allow for the development of compact shopping centers. These centers, in turn, are surrounded by multi- family dwellings (or areas of less intensity) that buffer residential neighbor- hoods from commercial activity and fast-moving traffic. Limited commercial shopping centers were also located at arterial inter- sections. Depending on the size of the shopping centers, some of these will require buffer areas. The purpose of these centers is to serve the needs of adjacent neighborhoods rather than the entire community. These centers will contain activities that are neighborhood oriented. Although the stripping of commercial and multi -family uses are discouraged in the Policy Statements, it is allowed in special situations, e.g., where a r LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY ET ColvlblEIZICAL Limrrsv ro• • •i • 1 FLOM I • IV I loM • • f . 11,••••:‘, •Gir • ....41L-1 1 11 ffiDmin1dinEdirimm Om : 1 • • • i • • ••• '4 .4 • 1 11 11 It,• i 1 • • • .,..1-0.. ...ii 1 • 1 11 I • • f# 1 11Nit • '-"2" ---- ----- I -------7••••12own limmif Rsiffsmilows* . l. : ?I. • -..11 , KING RANG ' : -.cqIi.:".iealgg:i114*-WItik, 17/77A C..0/4 MBR ICA L PIZ F',4t114. • OPE.N SPACM/ 1:Plz A IN AGE fljLto. / SEM I - R415LIC.. ExPizes-sww-es Z AMTEMIALS •116121 CoLLEc-roes Fkear.os.E1.7.,, C>Go OvemLAY CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 13/41'05 ED LAND LISS L.Dw t).Nsrry ALTERNATIVE LOW DENSITY ALTERNATIVE LAND USES HOUSING & POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS ACREAGE % SINGLE FAMILY 6,911 a 60 UNITS PER ACRE MULTI FAMILY 545 5 SINGLE FAMILY 5 LT. COMMERCIAL 160 1 MULTI FAMILY 15 H H COMMERCIAL 164 1 H I, LT. INDUSTRIAL — — TOTAL UNITS PER ACRE OPEN SPACE 705 6 SINGLE FAMILY 34,555 PARKS 468 4 MULTI FAMILY 8,175 PUBLIC 64 1 HOUSEHOLD SIZE FOR 2.56 TRANSPORTATION 2,562b 22 CENSUS TRACT 54 TOTAL 11,579 100% unxt. si.¢u„xn, Mus. an 10 rtn« SI.R, ,rano .I91,0. -11.15.l nocsrL muss.., na:-0. ,, :IS u°is,ne.s ,. 50i144111., Mcu MO. TOTAL POPULATION 109,389 LEGEND nsuni4LE FAM1LY P1FAMILY MuLit Ord Li MI -TEV Co14 4Ic4L C.oM MBRIcAL F'Aizt4e. OVEN SPADE / 17)IzA ipU A45 / SSW - RIEst..1c. EXPRE.-ssWAYs IEEE E.lz I ALS • so SI 131 CoLLC•-ro !ZS FkopasE.e. 0‘isieLAY CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN f7RDP.P.S.Er. Law, Lisa Mao. DcH6iTY AnualkriVa o goo %CO >WO H H '4) 1/4 • .1“uo, 010 MEDIUM DENSITY ALTERNATIVE LAND USES ACREAGE SINGLE FAMILY 6359° MULTI FAMILY 971 LT.COMMERCIAL 95 COMMERCIAL 545 LT. INDUSTRIAL' OPEN SPACE 705 PARKS 477 PUBLIC 44 TRANSPORTATION 2383b TOTAL 11579 55 8 1 5 6 4 .4 HOUSING &POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS UNITS PER ACRE SINGLE FAMILY 5 MULTI FAMILY 22 TOTAL UNITS PER ACRE SINGLE FAMILY 31,935 MULTI FAMILY 20,416 HOUSEHOLD SIZE FOR 21 CENSUS TRACT 54 100% 2.56 TOTAL POPULATION 134,019 ■ A 111 1 NAP ■ ■ '■ r , ■ 1 :.=, 1 �A --a *...>•• ..1 II: u — ■ ■III■■.IF■■■ • 1 IM • • a ■ ■ "MINNIE 1M 1 La '.....7727-..T',.,. _� • __ •*. �' Q CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI * rT! ▪ j PL,1 F PosEo LAuouss MIO■■■ 1111161111M1 • IIIMININIII■\ ,1 }U 1 L' NICji D1*N5ITYALTERNATWVE LEGEND S IN GLS FAM 1 LY MULTI FAMILY LIMITED GOMMEPZIGAL GOMMERIGAL PARKS 02,E1.1 SPADE / DRAW AGE PJ BLIG / SEMI- FIIBLIG EXPRESSWAYS MI ARTERIALS 190OCI G'LLE.GTORS F}CG F'of Eb OSo OVE1zLAY KING R'NG '4 {F2-*4.2fr S(45:raii, H rn HIGH DENSITY ALTERNATIVE LAND USES HOUSING & POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS ACREAGE SINGLE FAMILY 6,116a 53 MULTI FAMILY 1,246 11 SINGLE FAMILY LT. COMMERCIAL 118 1 MULTI FAMILY COMMERCIAL 581 5 LT. INDUSTRIAL — — OPEN SPACE 705 6 SINGLE FAMILY PARKS 550 5 MULTI FAMILY PUBLIC 52 .4 HOUSEHOLD SIZE FOR TRANSPORTATION 2,211 19 CENSUS TRACT 54 TOTAL 11,57913 100% 101,00000,005000500000501T .01510 5001000 510000 OT141IOY 100 101041.01.0005! ias a 51w5 rw,1 ura 5w UNITS PER ACRE 5 29 TOTAL UNITS PER ACRE 30,580 36,134 2.56 TOTAL POPULATION . 170,788 H H III -8 marginal access street is provided. However, the high-density alternative does display a stripping of multi -family uses along the proposed Crosstown Expressway. Such strips are not recommended along arterial streets but such a strip may be necessary along the proposed Crosstown Expressway. The Policy Statements also require that a graduated street system be developed throughout the City, and the existing transportation network will be useful for providing the framework that will meet these requirements. Although local streets are not shown on the map (due to problems in scale) , they are implied. Local streets provide access to residential areas while collector streets (a step higher in the graduated system) funnel traffic from residential areas to arterials. Arterials, one step higher than collectors, are major streets that link major land use activities throughout the city. Freeways, the highest level of graduated streets, move traffic from the metropolitan area to other areas in the region. The graduated street system also allowed elementary schools and parks to be located along collector streets, and when possible, the two facilities were located adjacent to one another to encourage their joint use. Moreover, the two facilities were also located along collector streets to avoid fast-moving traffic and between adjoining collectors to increase their accessibility from surrounding neighborhoods. With respect to AICUZ flight paths surrounding Cabaniss Field, the Policy Statements require that they be developed in a manner that is sensitive to expected levels of noise so that they will not subject residents to unreasonable risk due to possible aircraft accidents. For these reasons, these areas were converted, when possible, into parks or open space. In addition, areas with large drainage systems such as Oso Creek including its two small tributaries are recommended as open space/drainageways. In III -9 addition, along the Oso Creek a parkway street is recommended to take advantage of the unique and interesting visual relief provided by the Creek. With respect to economic development, the Policy Statements encourage private or public ventures in areas where they will be compatible with the surrounding land use activities. One of these ventures is the Botanical Garden located in the southeastern corner of the study area. The site is at the intersection of State Highway 2444 and Oso Creek, and it is surrounded by the Oso Parkway, which encompasses large environmentally -sensitive areas. Although this venture will attract a large number of tourists and local residents, it will not hinder residential development within the immediate area. The reason is that the reserve is large, and it contains large parcels of land that will buffer one activity from the other. Problems and Issues: Constraints to Development Soils - As discussed previously, the best soils for development within the study area are located along a small tributary of the Oso Creek; but since these soils form isolated pockets, they are not significantly important to develop- ment. On the other hand, Victoria Clays are widely distributed; and they form the largest group of soils throughout the study area (see Figure 4). Although these soils have moderate to severe limitations for development, they are relatively suited for residential development but marginally suited for commercial and industrial development. The only soils that had severe limitations to development were found along Oso Creek. Fortunately, these soils will not obstruct future development in the study area because they are located within the proposed Oso Parkway and in areas protected by environmental agencies. III -10 Stormwater Facilities - Presently, the London Area does not have a storm - water (drainage) plan. The City has entered into a contract with a consulting firm to develop a stormwater plan for the study area and all areas within the Oso Creek watershed. Once completed, the stormwater plan will show the areas and rights-of-way along which the drainageways lead to the Oso. In the meantime, an alternative land use (or development) plan should be utilized as the basis upon which drainageways will be constructed. If necessary, changes to the development plan will be made to accommodate the recommendations of the stormwater plan and the immediate needs of the area. Water and Wastewater Facilities - The City provides water to a limited number of residents; and, unfortunately, the existing lines are smaller in comparison to those required by the City. As development occurs, old lines must be replaced and new lines installed for all land use activities, including fire emergencies. As mentioned earlier, the City adopted a 1982 water distribution plan for the entire city and surrounding areas. The plan outlines several proposed mains that traverse the study area (see Figure 12). Once these mains are installed, feeder lines will be constructed to serve developing areas and existing house- holds. However, the general location of these lines will be determined as development occurs. The London Area also has no sewer or wastewater service. Consequently, area residents utilize septic tanks. However, this type of waste disposal system is not recommended for the study area because the soils have low -per- meability. If their use is unchecked, their proliferation may have a harmful effect on the local environment, including ground water contamination. For this reason, the City must adopt a wastewater service plan for the area. Another reason for adopting a wastewater plan and discouraging septic tanks is to promote orderly, contiguous growth that is cost-effective to the city. Oftentimes, septic tanks encourage isolated development that lead to the frag- mentation of the urban landscape; and contain plumbing systems that cannot be upgraded to the city's developmental standards. Parks and Recreation Facilities - Parks are an essential aspect in the developmental process of all areas because they serve a three -fold purpose: 1) they provide facilities for outdoor recreation; 2) they enable historic and scenic areas in the city to be preserved; and 3) they permit areas poorly adapted to urban use, by virtue of their steepness or poor drainage, to be protected from harmful private use. An accepted minimum standard for parks in an urban area requires one acre of parkland for each 100 persons. Approximately one-half of this should consist of local or neighborhood parks, with the remaining in large parks. Other "rules of thumb" call for the setting aside of ten percent of the urban space for parks or open space. These standards, of course, are not always realized because of fixed conditions or other factors that may preclude the possibility of complete- ly addressing them. But, an attempt was made to realize these goals while developing the alternative land use plans. The low-density alternative contains 1,173 acres of parkland and open space, the medium -density 1,182 acres, and the high-density 1,255 acres. If each acreage is divided by its acre per 100 persons ratio, the calculations show that the low-density alternative contains 1.07 acres, the medium -density 0.88 acre, and the high-density 0.74 acre per 100 persons, respectively. The analysis demonstrates that only the low-density alternative meets the minimum requirement, while the other two fall short of the goal. Nonetheless, these ratios are relatively close to the minimum standard, and they can there- fore be considered adequate. Moreover, the space preserved for parks and open space also meets the ten percent park requirement, and parkland alone accounts for five percent of the total urban space. By comparison, they City requires a five percent park dedication from all developers before an area can be platted for residential purposes. If this is the case, the City would require that 372 acres be ded- icated for all residential areas (single and multi -family dwellings) in the low-density land use plan. Similarly, the City would require that 367 acres be dedicated in the medium density map and 368 acres in the high-density land use alternative. From this perspective, all three land use plans have an ample amount of parkland and open space for all residential areas. The Oso Creek forms the northern boundary of the London Study Area, and it constitutes a unique wetland environment. Along the Oso's channels, bosks, and hills, native vegetation and wildlife are found in abundance. The vegetation alone is extremely important to the ecosystem because it provides food and protection that supports a multitude of wildlife within the natural setting. It is, therefore, extremely important that the land use plans protect the Creek from harmful land use activities that could pollute the water quality and destroy the natural habits of the waterway. Transportation Facilities - As mentioned earlier, the London Study area has an existing transportation network that forms the basis upon which land use activities will be located. As development occurs, it is important to plan effectively for future street and highways capable of carrying large traffic flows. To accomplish this task, it is necessary to adopt a transportation plan for the area that will obtain sufficient rights-of-way and allow for a timely and orderly expansion of streets and highways. Another important issue associated with transportation is a long-term bridge building policy along Oso Creek and other drainageways in the study area. Such a policy should reduce the long-term construction costs and ensure the construction of structures that will not impede 100 -year floodwaters. The three alternatives show that as the population density increases, the number of bridges also increase. The reason for this is to accommodate large traffic flows and business activities between adjoining areas. There have been some concerns expressed by property owners that a bridge across the Oso at Everhart Road is needed. Staff does not recommend a bridge at this location unless 1) upon more detail study that actual traffic needs will warrant a bridge at this location; 2) that a bridge at this location will not congest traffic along Everhart to the north. Land Use Activities - The AICUZ flight paths extend beyond Cabaniss Field to the London Study Area. These zones define areas of high noise and accident potential. Consequently, they must be developed carefully to ensure compatible land use activities adjacent to the airfield and protect the public health and welfare of nearby residents. Simply stated, careful planning around the air- field will prevent future land use conflicts, and, in the process, enhance the development of the impacted areas. Since the London Study Area will also be one of the city's most important growth areas in the near future, compatible land uses should be planned so that the immediate and future needs of all residents will be met. The result should be a land use plan that closely resembles the guidelines expressed in the Policy Statements of the Comprehensive Plan. IV -1 IV. LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS Given the City's proposed Comprehensive Policy Statements, the discussion of existing conditions in chapter 2, and the analysis of these conditions in chapter 3, a number of development issues begin to emerge. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize these issues and suggest a recommended course of action. The recommendations are as follows: 1. The need to identify a future land use pattern for the study area is of critical importance as the future land use pattern will provide a plan that will help the developer and the city to better coordinate zoning and platting, development of parks and the installation of the water and sewer system to accommodate future needs. Based on comments received at the Planning Commission's public hearing, the city's policy statements and other city plans it is recommended that the City Council adopt the future land use map displayed on page IV -2. Staff is of the opinion that the high density alternative is not as consistent with the Policy Statements as is the medium -density alternative due to the stripping of activities along the Crosstown Expressway. Furthermore, the low-density alternative, although consistent with the Policy Statements, does not appear to contain a realistic land use density. 2. An important issue related to development of the future land use pattern is the need to prevent future land use conflicts adjacent to Cabaniss Field. Experience has shown, both in Texas and the rest of the country, that improper placement of land use activities adjacent to airports can result in public safety problems, loss of property values, and other serious land use conflicts. LEGEND LIMITED GOM MEKIGAL P7A GOMMERIGAL PARKS OPEN SPA E / DRAINAGE PGBL/c / SMI- F1IBLIG EXPRESSWAYS ®806 AICT Etc IALS ■maim GOLL6GTORS NkOPOE EO 06p OVERLAY CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 000 000 HVO H LAND USES LONDON AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN HOUSING &POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS ACREAGE % SINGLE FAMILY 6359a 55 UNITS PER ACRE MULTI FAMILY 971 8 SINGLE FAMILY 5 LT.COMMERCIAL 95 1 MULTI FAMILY 22 COMMERCIAL 545 LT. INDUSTRIAL' — — - TOTAL UNITS PER ACRE OPEN SPACE 705 6 SINGLE FAMILY 31,935 PARKS 477 4 MULTI FAMILY 20,416 PUBLIC 44 .4 TRANSPORTATION 23836 21 HOUSEHOLD SIZE FOR 2.56 CENSUS TRACT 54 TOTAL 11,579 100% • Z iin sm wm n '"' m nntt, u,n, xmana la ""'"' " ' 1,111=1=1.11=1:4111'"""'''''"'"''''' TOTAL POPULATION 134,019 IV -4 To reduce future land use conflicts adjacent to Cabaniss Field it is recommended that the AICUZ Clear Zone be purchased by the City, if the City has the funds to do so, or the Navy, prior to water and sewer lines being placed in the area between the Crosstown Expressway extension and the Weber Road extension. Furthermore, it is recommended that the APZ-1 and APZ-2 be zoned for very low densities such as are found in the "F -R" and "RE" zoning districts. 3. The London Area Development Plan should function to protect the Oso Creek from land uses that could cause significant pollution to water quality and damage to natural habitats. The Oso Creek has been recognized by the State as an important natural habitat and as an important archaeological site. In addition, the Oso Creek area is important to the community as the botanical garden is located along the Oso Creek, not to mention its impor- tance to residents who have homes on the north side of the Oso Creek. To encourage preservation of openspace along the Oso Creek and to ensure that future development does not impede the flow of flood waters and cause flooding beyond the floodway it is recommended that areas within the floodway be rezoned to "F -R" Farm -Rural zoning district so that when these areas are platted they will contain a great deal of open space because of the five acre lot minimum. In addition to rezoning and creating open space, the City should develop a special overlay performance zoning district within the floodplain to preserve additional open space along the Oso Creek and insure that future development is compatible with this environmentally sensitive area. Such overlay districts have been used by other communities to protect environ- mentally sensitive areas. An overlay district would be "overlayed" on top of an existing residential, commercial, or industrial district and possibly IV -5 allow additional uses if such uses meet design criteria that would not cause damage to the environment. For example, where an area is zoned for residential use and is then overlayed the overlay might allow for some multi -family uses if the multi -family uses meet certain design criteria. 4. An important concern with regard to future land uses suggested in the London Plan is that there is not any proposed industrial land uses. It is possible that there will not be any need for industrial uses in the area since there is vacant industrial land immediately to the north of the study area and because the proposed transportation system should provide effi- cient access to existing industrial areas. Furthermore, if the plan does depict industrial land uses for the area and these areas are prezoned, it will be very difficult to "down zone" them back to residential uses when this plan is updated. For these reasons it is recommended that industrial land uses not be placed on this plan but could be considered when the plan is updated. However, the plan could be amended for any high-tech indus- trial, non-polluting use, provided it is in conjunction with a mixed use concept (compatible mixing of residential/commercial/industrial activi- ties). 5. Currently the City does not have a master drainage plan for the London Area. In addition to the drainageways suggested on the future land use map, it is recommended that a drainage master plan for the area be devel- oped. Development of the plan should incorporate the future land uses recommended on this plan and any other applicable future land use plans. The drainage master plan should evaluate and, if necessary, recommend changes to the existing floodway boundary lines along the Oso Creek. Assessment of the floodway boundary line should be based on the ultimate development of the area. IV -6 6. The adopted plan shall serve as the City's recommendation for the location of future expressways, arterials, and collectors. However, these locations should be considered conceptual, especially with regard to collector street design. The collector streets represented on the plan should be considered as a minimum. 7. The location of the neighborhood parks on the plan represent a locational concept insofar as such parks should be located with maximum reasonable access to pedestrian traffic, adjacent to existing or future elementary school sites/residential areas and away from major arterial streets. It is recommended that future elementary school sites be coordinated with the City Parks Board so that, where possible, elementary schools and neighborhood parks can be combined. Future middle and high school locations should be located adjacent to major streets, however, it is not recommended that these schools be located next to expressway/arterial intersections. These intersections should be reserved for activities that require good access to Crosstown traffic. Middle and high schools usually do not require freeway access and would therefore tend to unnecessarily congest these access points. 8. It is important to establish a long-term bridge building policy where the London Area abuts the Oso Creek. Such a policy would help to reduce long-term costs and ensure that such structures will not impede 100 -year floodwaters. With this in mind, existing bridges should be improved and a new bridge be built as funds are available and as development warrants such improvements at the following locations: Existing Bridges - Crosstown Expressway extension (S.H. 286) IV -7 - Weber (F.M. 43) - Staples (F.M. 2444) - F.M. 763 New Bridge - County Road 49 extended to connect with County Road 35 north of the Oso Creek via a new bridge. In addition, it is recommended that any future pedestrian crossings not impede the 100 year flood waters. 9. It is recommended that the existing water and wastewater master plans be expanded/amended to accommodate the future development recommendations of this plan and the recently approved Chapman Ranch Plan. In addition, it is recommended that the City continue to utilize the state requirements for permitting on-site septic systems. 10. It is recommended that the London Area Development Plan be incorporated, quantified, and analyzed in the Corpus Christi Urban Transportation Study as part of the continuing urban transportation planning process. A-1 APPENDIX T* • . . PLANNING PROCESS . FOR AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANS . MONTHS --� '^~^^`^~ ,,,=^= CITY COUNCIL __—_,,...,., _--_----..""",",-------.`~~`^^-----.^ � . • COUNCIL.~~.� -- COUNCIL CONDUCT. ' ~~ ~~~~ ~~~'~. ^~~..^.^^,. .~~~.^ .^~�.~^��1..' ���������.�. PLANNING COMMISSION CITIZENS PANINGRECOUNTED,~~�. "=~ °,"=".,` BE MOM, MEETING (11) � ..~~.~~=~~ \ / / \ / \ / / / � ~~~~' ~~. ALTERNATIVE 911101~^ Issues REPORT ~~'�� .^~~~ ���,.������� / / _ REPORT . �~~ ~,~...'...~...~.~ es That the foregoing second reading on following vote: Betty N. Turner David Berlanga, Sr. Leo Guerrero Frank Mendez ordinance was this the I read for he first tie and passed to its day of 1 Q( , 1967 , by the That the foregoing ordinance was read third reading on this the A day following vote: Betty N. Turner David Berlanga, Sr. Leo Guerrero Frank Mendez Clif Moss Bill Pruet Mary Rhodes Mary Pat Slavik Linda Strong for the second time and passed to its of , g�p y- u,A.ILQ�, 19 F7 , by the Clif Moss Bill Pruet Mary Rhodes Mary Pat Slavik Linda Strong 61-11, othao- That the foregoing ordi enc was rea for the third time and passed finally on this the 15 day of , 19 $7 , by the following vote: Betty N. Turner David Berlanga, Sr. Leo Guerrero Frank Mendez c) Li.t1 � Clif Moss Bill Pruet Mary Rhodes Mary Pat Slavik Linda Strong aire- PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 16 day of , 19g7 . ATTEST: 4Lcretary APP VED: /7111 -DAY OF HAL GEORGE, CIT ATTORNEY 19 P7 99.044.01 MA THE CIT OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 19975