Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout021431 RES - 07/14/1992RESOLUTION Concerning the Safe Drinking Water Act Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi is both morally and legally obligated to ensure that its municipal water treatment system delivers safe water to its customers; and Whereas, the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 and its amendments provide for the safety of drinking water supplies throughout the United States by establishing and enforcing national drinking water quality standards according to specific timetables; for the Environmental Protection Agency to set national drinking regulations, conduct special studies and research, and oversee implementation of the Act; and for State governments to adopt regulations no less stringent than federal regulations; and Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi will be forced to spend millions of dollars in order to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act; and Whereas, the City currently uses chloramine to disinfect its drinking water but expects the Act and implementing regulations to require a change in the entire disinfection process by installing a treatment system using ozone, a strong disinfectant and oxidizing agent, at a cost of approximately $23 million; and Whereas, the City is required to establish Maximum Contaminant Levels for 83 specific contaminants initially, and 25 additional contaminants every three years; and for each, the City will be required to establish appropriate means for treatment using best available technology; and the City will be required to test Synthetic Organic Chemicals; and the best available technology for meeting these requirements is Granular Activated Carbon adsorption, for which the installation cost would be approximately $52 million; and Whereas, the City's water treatment testing and chemical costs have sky -rocketed; for example, the City is required to perform extensive monitoring every six months for lead and copper in drinking water, and the new coliform bacteria rule requires the City to take 160 samples for coliform per month; and Whereas, future disinfection standards may require greater water storage requirements than currently available, requiring the City to construct an additional 10 million to 12.5 million gallon clearwell at a cost of approximately $3 million; and Whereas, the mandated changes to water treatment systems are not justified by health problems in Corpus Christi; the City -County Health Department has no record of water- borne diseases due to the City's water system and it is not defensible that a different treatment process will be beneficial to our citizens. 021431 vID MICROFILMED 2 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Council strongly objects to the costs and potential liability imposed by the Safe Drinking Water Act and is deeply concerned customers will have to absorb unwarranted costs for unneeded changes to an already excellent water treatment system. Section 2. That the Environmental Protection Agency rules and regulations implementing the Safe Drinking Water Act are too burdensome for cities and that Corpus Christi can not afford initial costs approaching $100 million and operating expenses which will be tripled. Section 3. That the City Council supports the 1992 resolution (attached as Exhibit A) passed by the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies addressing concerns of the nation's larger metropolitan water supply agencies regarding the Safe Drinking Water Act. Section 4. That the City Council urges members of Congress and officials of the Environmental Protection Agency to reassess implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act, and seek affordable solutions to demonstrated problems based on scientific data. Section 5. That the City Secretary is instructed to send copies of this resolution to United States Senator Uoyd Bentsen, United States Senator Phil Gramm, United States Representative Solomon Ortiz, United States Representative Kika de la Garza, United States Representative Craig Laughlin and United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator William K. Reilly. ATTEST: City Secretary Maydr City of Corp C@risti APPROVED: f/ DAY OF ,jams , 1992 James`Bray, City Attorrt attachments Resolution adopted by the Association SAFE DRINKING Resolution: Part A of Metropolitan Water Agencies WATER ACT (P.L. 99339) EXHIBIT The Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA) commends Congress for enacting the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1986 and urges Congress to continue its oversight responsibility to ensure reasonable and cost-effective implementation of the law. During reauthorization of the drinking Water Act, Congress should consider, at a minimum, increased funding of health effects research, development of realistic timeframes for compliance with Safe Drinking Water Act standards, and authorization for EPA to establish minimum national standards for a laboratory and operator certification program. PartB AMWA supports the promulgation of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations as required under P.L. 99-339. Drinking water contaminants, for which standards are promulgated under the law, should be regulated on the following basis: the contaminant should exhibit an adverse human health impact through exposure in drinking water; MCL's should be set in the context of a consistent, science -based risk management policy; the regulation must be based on sound science; the contaminant must occur in drinking water and present a national problem; • the contaminant must be capable of being detected and measured within practical quantitation limits; • the contaminant must be capable of being removed or inactivated to the standards set by a designated best available technology that is both available and practical; or • a health advisory should be prepared for those contaminants which occur in drinking water but do not present a national problem. AMWA, recognizing that one of the many uses of a public water supply is for human consumption, fully supports the establishment of appropriate regulations and standards necessary to protect public health from the adverse effects of harmful chemicals or bacteriologic agents in drinking water. AMWA strongly recommends that the EPA conduct the detailed and exhaustive toxicological research necessary to ensure the accuracy of such regulations and standards, and that the agency proceed expeditiously in defining the factors appropriate to the application of public health requirements, such as Unreasonable Risk to Health (URTH). AMWA also encourages the agency to be consistent in setting standards for the protection of human health. AMWA acknowledges and appreciates the efforts EPA has demonstrated to involve major water suppliers in an open, flexible rulemaking process and pledges its commitment to a positive application of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Rationale: 1. In order for the Safe Drinking Water Act to be effective, its requirements must be practical and achievable. Health effects research must be conducted to ensure the regulations are developed to address those contaminants which pose a threat to public health. 2. To encourage effective planning at the local level, it is important for EPA to coordinate the promulgation of new regulations for filtration and protection from microbiological agents and new standards for disinfection by-products and organic chemicals. 3. The development of a comprehensive standard-setting process will enable local agencies to make rational, cost-effective choices of supply sources and treatment technologies. 4. National regulations reflecting congressional intent which are implemented at the state level will ensure that a consistent level of public health protection is provided to all consumers. Corpus Christi, Texas % day of //x , 19 42._ The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Mary Rhodes Cezar Galindo Leo Guerrero C( (, Betty Jean Longoria Edward A. Martin gel/ C Joe McComb Dr. David McNichols -( Clif Moss 171,{ Mary Pat Slavik t" 066 021431