Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout023289 ORD - 04/28/1998AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, CHAPTER 53 - TRAFFIC, ARTICLE IV - TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, BY ADDING DIVISION H -- RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Code of Ordinances of the City of Corpus Christi is hereby amended to read as follows: ARTICLE IV. TRAFFIC -- CONTROL DEVICES Division L Generally Division H. Residential Traffic Calming Devices Section 53-82 Authority to install The city manager, or such officers or employees of the city designated by the city manager, shall, within their discretion, place and maintain traffic calming devices and measures, and any associated traffic control signs and other devices, to discourage cut -through traffic and to minimize unsafe travel speeds in residential neighborhoods, as allowed under the provisions of the City's Residential Traffic Management Program. Section 53-83 Definitions 85th Percentile Travel Speed: The speed at which 85% of the traffic on a particular street travels at or below, determined by a random measurement of travel speeds. Household: A single family unit dwelling, townhouses, duplex, condominium, or apartment complex along a residential or neighborhood collector street. Neighborhood Collector Street: A street which has primary function to circulate traffic within a subdivision comprised mainly of single family unit dwellings, but which additional function for serving local property access. Petition: The document provided by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of formally identifying the number of households within the petition area that support the requested installation of a traffic calming device(s). H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAVERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 I:24PM illukUFJLMED i� )3289 1 Petition Area: The area along a street or streets having households to which the petition for traffic calming devices must be presented. Project Requestor: The individual or individuals, or property owner association, which submit the initial request to the City for consideration of a traffic calming device(s). Project Street: That portion of a particular street, within the right-of-way of which a traffic calming device is proposed to be constructed under this article. Property Owner: The owner(s) of any tract or parcel of real property within a neighborhood area. Property Owner Association: Any homeowners association, property owners' group or civic association, whether incorporated or not, whose membership includes property owners and/or residents of a neighborhood area. Resident: Any person who resides in or owns or operates a home upon any tract or parcel of real property within a neighborhood area. Residential Street: A street which has primary function to serve local property access within a subdivision compromised mainly of single family unit dwellings, townhouses, duplexes, condominiums, or apartment complexes. Traffic Calming Device: A design element, including speed humps, traffic diverters, mini traffic circle, and regulatory access restriction, in and/or along a street or intersection, having the sole purpose to discourage cut -through traffic and to minimize travel speeds. Section 53-84 Project eligibility requirements and design standards All of the following criteria shall be satisfied for a street to be considered eligible for traffic calming devices and/ or measures once the City has received a citizen request for residential traffic calming. A. Operational and Geometric Requirements of the Street -- Consideration of Physical Devices Only functionally -classified "residential" and "neighborhood collector" streets having not more than one travel lane in each direction and not more than 40 feet in width (measured from back -of -curb to back -of -curb) shall be considered for installation of traffic calming devices. Any functionally -classified "through street" identified in the City's Code of Ordinances Section 53-251 or other street which has function to substantially serve through traffic immediately abutting residential subdivisions shall not qualify. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAUERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) Apri120, 1998 1:24PM 2 Diverter traffic calming devices shall not be installed on a functional neighborhood collector street 3. The street shall have a posted or prima facie speed limit of 30 mph or less determined in accordance with the City's method of establishing speed zones. 4. A street shall be shown to have an average (85th percentile) travel speed above the legal speed limit to be eligible for a speed hump or mini -traffic circle. 5. Speed humps and traffic diverters shall not be located in a horizontal curve or on a vertical curve where visibility is restricted. The street should have curb and gutter. Consideration may be given to streets without curb and gutter if it is determined that street drainage can be accommodated and that it will be possible to prevent vehicle run-arounds. The street shall be approved by each of the Fire Department and Police Department for installation of the traffic calming device. After a petition or request is received, and upon determination by the Traffic Engineering Division that a street or streets have the necessary physical and geometric characteristics to qualify for a traffic calming device, a layout of the subdivision will be forwarded to the Fire and Police Departments for their identification of streets which must be kept free of any traffic calming devices. Unless each of the Fire and Police Departments approves a traffic calming on the project street, no physical traffic calming devices will be allowed on the project street. If the street is a transit route, it shall be reviewed and approved by the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). The average daily two-way traffic demand on the street shall be not less than 400 vehicles per day (averaged over not less than a three -weekday time period). 10. Traffic calming device shall not be installed in front of an opponent's property. 11. Mini -traffic circles necessitating additional right-of-way shall be considered only at locations where the property owners agree to dedicated easements for the widened corners. B. Operational and Geometric Characteristics of the Street -- Consideration of Passive (Time Regulated Access Restriction) Devices. The following basic criteria would be used to determine justification for an access restriction: 1. a time regulated access restriction will be limited to not more than six hours H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNA\JERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) 3 April 20, 1998 1:24PM during any one day, 2. petition initiated by and signed by 90% of property owners abutting the street block under consideration, 3. street must be functionally -classified residential street (excluding neighborhood collector streets), 4. traffic demand on the street exceeds 750 vehicles per day (average weekday), 5. peak hour through traffic on street exceeds 50% of the total peak hour traffic, 6. the 85th -percentile traffic speed on the street exceeds the legal speed limit, and 7. City Traffic Engineer determines that an equally acceptable and reasonable alternative traffic route of higher functional classification is available to accommodate traffic denied access at the restricted street and would not negatively impact any other residential street. C. Design Standards for Speed Humps 1. Dimension and cross-section: a. Two types of speed hump designs, circular or flat-topped, shall be considered. The circular speed hump will generally be approximately 12 feet long and have the cross-section of a segment of a circle with a maximum height of 3 inches at the center. The flat-topped speed hump will generally be approximately 22 feet long consisting of a 10 -foot long plateau with 6 -foot long circular arc approaches on either side. This flat-topped speed hump will be 3 inches in height. b. The cross-section design of a speed hump will depend on the traffic calming design speed objective for a particular project street. The following design speed objectives shall apply: • 30 MPH Design -- for typical residential streets without any unique development or geometric features *** • 25 MPH Design -- for streets abutting public parks/playgrounds, on streets which have horizontal curvature designed for this speed, or other type development which in the opinion of the City Traffic Engineer may generate an above average level of child pedestrian activity. • 20 MPH Design -- for street sections immediately abutting elementary schools or streets which have horizontal curvature designed for this speed. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAUERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 4 • 15 MPH Design -- used only on approaches to street sections having horizontal curvature designed for this speed. ***Note: The City Traffic Engineer may consider unusual levels of traffic accident experience to apply a design speed objective lower than 30 MPH on any typical residential street. • On streets with curbs, humps should extend fully across the road from curb joint to curb joint. A 12 -inch minimum taper may be considered for drainage. For humps installed on non -curbed roadways special treatment such as delineator posts or other approved traffic control device should be considered to prevent vehicle run-arounds. 2. Spacing and Location Speed humps will usually be placed between 200 feet to 600 feet apart at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer. Other spacing may be used based upon engineering judgement. The following guidelines will be considered when determining speed hump spacing but may be adjusted at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer due to local circumstances in each case. a. On single short blocks (less than 600 feet) a single hump positioned near mid -point shall be considered. b. On single blocks of moderate length (601 - 1,200 feet), a two hump configuration shall be considered. c. On very long single blocks (exceeding 1,200 feet), no more than three humps shall be considered. d. On lengthy continuous street segments or for humps provided over a series of blocks, interior humps shall be placed 400 feet to 600 feet apart. The following points shall be considered when locating speed humps (or other traffic calming device): a. Speed hump will not be located in front of a driveway or within an intersection. Speed humps will not be located within 100 feet of an intersection. b. The first hump in a series should be installed within approximately 200 feet downstream of a stop sign. c. Speed humps will not be located over, or contain, manholes, or be H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAV ERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 5 located adjacent to fire hydrants or driveways. d. For humps located near drainage inlets, the hump will be placed just downstream of the inlet. If this is not feasible, special treatment must be considered for drainage. e. If possible, humps will be located on property lines rather than directly in front of a residence. f. The advantage of existing or potential street lighting should be taken into account when determining hump locations. Traffic Control Traffic control consisting of signs, pavement markings and enhanced street lighting should be provided to advise roadway users of a speed hump's presence and to guide their subsequent action. Traffic signs and pavement markings shall conform to the Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control and Devices (MUTCD) standards. D. Diverter and Traffic Circle Design Standards The diverter and traffic circle traffic calming devices shall be constructed in accordance with the standards developed and maintained by the City's Traffic Engineering Division. Variations may be made by the City Traffic Engineer for varying roadway geometry and right-of-way limitations. E. Project Prioritization Criteria Traffic calming device projects shall be ranked according to the criteria established in this section. Projects will be assigned points on the basis of existing speeds and volumes, average number of speed related accidents documented by the Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD), proximity of abutting public park area, and presence of school and/or other special pedestrian generators in the area. The project accumulating the greatest number of points shall be assigned the highest priority. Among projects with the same rank, higher priority will be given to the one with the earliest application date. The City may revise priorities on the basis of continuing traffic accident experience which has occurred beyond the time the initial evaluation and priority ranking had been completed. Accident Criteria All accidents considered for point assignment shall have causative factors (including, but not limited to excessive travel speed) which have a strong likelihood for mitigation by one or more traffic calming devices. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAUERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 6 Total Number of Reported Accidents Over a Period Of 3 Consecutive Years Points Assigned Less than 2 0 2 1 3-4 2 4-5 3 6-7 4 8 or more 5 Speed Criteria The speed criteria considers the percentage of vehicles traveling greater than 7 MPH over the posted speed limit. This information will be obtained from a series of radar speed studies on the project street on normal weekday periods during peak hour traffic periods (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.). Percentage of Vehicles Traveling Greater than 7 MPH Over Posted Speed Limit Points Assigned 0 0 1-2 1 3-4 2 5-6 3 7-8 4 9-10 5 11-12 6 13 - 14 7 15 - 16 8 17 - 18 9 19 - 20 10 Greater Than 20 % 11 Traffic Volume Criteria Traffic volumes (two-way) during any one of the normal peak hours and during a minimum three -weekday study period are considered. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAVERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) 7April 20, 1998 1:24PM a. Speed Humps Hourly Volume (vehicles/hour) Points Assigned Less than 50 0 51 to 100 1 101-200 3 201-300 5 301 - 400 7 Greater than 400 9 7 1,301 Traffic Diverters and Mini -Traffic Circles Daily Volume Vehicles/Day Points Assigned Less than 500 0 501 - 700 1 701 - 900 3 901 - 1,100 5 1,101 - 1,300 7 1,301 - 1,500 9 1,501 - 1,700 11 1,701 - 1,900 13 Greater than 1,900 15 4. Type of Neighborhood Criteria Points will be assigned to the project if there are schools and/or special pedestrian generators (such as parks, elderly housing, community center, shopping areas). a. Elementary school on project street. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAVERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 3 points 8 Middle school on project street 2 points c. School within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project street. 1 point d. Special pedestrian generators within 1,000 -foot radius of the project street (libraries, neighborhood recreation centers, community center, ballpark complex, shopping mall, or strip shopping center. 1 point for each facility e. Absence of sidewalks on the project street. 1 point f. No available functional paralleling arterial and collector "through" street within 1/4 mile. 1 point Public park within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project street. 1 point g. 5. Cost Sharing Criteria The cost for a traffic calming device shall be shared between the City and the residents according to the following criteria. Points considered for cost share are based on points assigned for priority ranking. Points from Priority Ranking City's Cost Share 20 and Above 100 % 16-19 75% 12-15 50% 8-11 25% 4-7 0% Section 53-85 Project prioritization Speed hump, traffic diverter, and mini traffic circle projects satisfying the above criteria will be prioritized on a citywide basis using the criteria developed by the Traffic Engineering Office, Section 53-84. Section 53-86 Citizen cost participation responsibility The cost for speed hump installation(including signs, pavement markings, and if necessary, H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNA1JERRY\ORD)005.ORD (dkw) April20, 1998 1:24PM 9 special features) may be shared between the City and the residents. Cost-sharing criteria shall be used to determine the residents' share of the installation cost, according to the cost -share criteria identified in Section 53-89. A. City staff will submit a statement to the requestor(s) of each approved project indicating the estimated total installation cost, City's cost share (if any), residents' cost share (if any), and the project's ranking on the priority list. If the project does not receive high enough priority to receive full or partial City funding, yet still satisfies the City's eligibility criteria (Section 53-84. A) and accumulates at least four (4) criteria ranking points, residents will have the option to voluntarily pay for the full installation cost. The residents' cost share is that percentage of the total cost which is not the City's responsibility. One or more residents may pay this share or it may come from other private sources -- the exact manner of which would be left to the residents. For projects eligible for partial City funding, it will be the responsibility of the requester(s) to ensure the residents' cost share is deposited with the City not less than ninety (90) days prior to the planned date of installation. If the City does not receive the residents' cost share within this time, the project will be removed from the priority list. In such case, a new petition must be submitted if the neighborhood wants to be considered for installation of a traffic calming device in the next fiscal year. Other guaranteed payment procedures may be offered to cover the residents' cost share, at the discretion of the City. Residents will be permitted to expedite the traffic calming device installation by voluntarily paying the full installation as long as the project street satisfies the minimum eligibility requirements (Section 53-84). Section 53-87 Design, construction, maintenance, removal and alteration A. Design standards and installation procedures for speed humps, traffic diverters, mini - traffic circles and related features, such as signs and pavement markings shall be prepared by the Traffic Engineering Office (Refer to Appendix C). Construction of speed humps, traffic diverters and mini -traffic circles will be administered by the Traffic Engineering Office in conjunction with the City's Street Service Department or by contract installation, at the discretion of the City. The City of Corpus Christi will maintain the speed humps and traffic diverters and all related features. Landscaping within mini traffic circles shall be approved by the City's Department of Park & Recreation and maintained, through mutual letter of understanding with the organized neighborhood association, by the project applicants. The process for speed hump or traffic diverter alteration or removal requested by the residents shall be the same as the process for installation, except that there will be no City participation in the cost incurred. A petition approved by the neighborhood association, documenting that at least two-thirds (2/3) of all the households and businesses adjacent to the speed hump or traffic diverter street are in favor of the H:U,EG-DIR\DIANNAUERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 10 devices' removal, shall be required. C. In case the Traffic Engineering Office determines that an unforseen problem has resulted due to the hump, diverter or mini traffic circle, it may be redesigned or removed by the City. In such case, the City will bear the full cost of removal and restoration of the street to original condition. Section 53-88 Traffic calming device study process The following items describe the procedure to be followed for speed hump or traffic diverter installation: A. Project Request Request for speed hump or traffic diverter installation can be initiated by any one individual, group of residents, or neighborhood association. A request shall be sent in writing to the City Traffic Engineer. Preliminary Review of Citizen / Neighborhood Request After a request for a traffic calming device has been received, City staff will conduct an initial investigation of the street's eligibility in regards to the operational and geometric characteristics (Section 53-84. A). The Fire and Police Department will be forwarded a copy of the petition and subdivision layout, following determination of the initial investigation that the basic criteria is satisfied, for these department's review and specification of any streets which should not have calming devices. If the operational and geometric requirements for eligibility are not met, or if the Fire and Police Departments do not approve the request, the street shall not be considered for the traffic calming device and the requester(s) will be notified. If after initial investigation, it is determined that the street qualified for the traffic calming device, a petition and an endorsement statement for the neighborhood association (if applicable) shall be mailed to the requester(s). The project requester(s) will be responsible for circulating the petition in the petition area. 4. If the approved petition and endorsement statement for the neighborhood association (if applicable) is received by the specified date, City staff shall conduct a field investigation and collect preliminary data, including traffic volumes and speeds. An approved project street will be placed on the list of streets eligible for the traffic calming device installation. A priority ranking will be assigned to the street according to Project Prioritization Criteria identified in Section 53-89. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAUERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 11 C. Petition Requirement / Process 1. The petition area may be extended by the City Traffic Engineer to include nearby streets which may see an increase in traffic as a result of this project. This "petition area" will be defined by the City's Traffic Engineering Office. It is intended that the petition is to be presented by residents on a project block section or block sections, dependent on the perceived impact the traffic calming device(s) would have on upstream and downstream block sections. 2. A petition from the residents and business owners within the defined petition area documenting that at least two-thirds of all households adjacent to the project street support the installation of a traffic calming device for the study to proceed further. Multi -family dwellings with more than four units shall be counted as one household, with the property owner or manager representing the household. If a household is occupied by a renter, the property owner of that household is responsible for signing the petition. Consideration of mini - traffic circles will only be considered for petitions from organized neighborhood (property owner) associations, including a letter stating the long term commitment of the association for continual maintenance of any approved landscaping within the traffic circle. 3. A statement from the neighborhood association endorsing a mini -traffic circle and its committment to continually maintain any landscaping on the mini - traffic circle, if the mini -circle is the targeted calming device. D. Appeal Process 1. Any citizen, group of citizens, or neighborhood association contesting the point ranking, relative priority to other approved traffic calming projects, or disapproval rendered by the City Traffic Engineer, and/or the interpretation or application of any criteria, described herein, by the City Traffic Engineer for a requested or petitioned traffic calming project may file an appeal with the City Traffic Engineer on the prescribed appeal form, within ten (10) days after a notice of project rating and related decision regarding the requested or petitioned project has been provided to the requesting citizen, group of citizens, or neighborhood association. 2. In such case of an appeal, a hearing shall be scheduled before the City's Transportation Advisory Committee in its first available monthly meeting following receipt of the appeal, or contingent on satisfying proper legal notice requirements for posting of the Committee's meeting agenda. Upon conducting the hearing, including any supplemental information the appellant may wish to present, the Transportation Advisory Committee shall make a recommendation to the City Council on the appeal. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAVERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 12 The City Manager shall set the date of such hearing before the City Council, and the City Council will have final authority on the appealed project rating and decision for what traffic calming devices, if any, will be authorized. Section 53-89 Funding for approved traffic calming projects A. City funds will be allocated once a year, after the Residential Traffic Management Neighborhood Program budget request is prepared by the Engineering Services Department. During a fiscal year, City funding will proceed in descending order from the top of priority list. Project requests received during a fiscal year (with completed studies) shall be eligible for funding during the same fiscal year. B. During the formulation of each fiscal year budget, the Department of Engineering Services shall recommend an annual operating budget for the Residential Traffic Management Program based on pending eligible projects waiting to be undertaken plus additional projects estimated to be requested for the budget year. The City Council will approve an annual operating budget for each fiscal year. Once an approved project street is listed on the priority list, it will be considered for funding up to three consecutive years. If after three years a project has not been constructed (whether due to limited funds or a low priority rating), a recertification of support for the traffic calming device will be required. This time limit ensures that the project request has not become obsolete because of changing traffic conditions and/or support of new residents in the area. The project requester(s) and the neighborhood association will be notified when the three-year time limit expires. Recertification of the petition may result in the project receiving a different (higher or lower) relative priority with other approved projects. If the recertification process fails to support the project, the project will be removed from the priority list. A new request may be made to re-enter the project after six months of the recertification effort, and, in such case, the usual procedures will be followed. Of the City's annual allocated funds, which may vary from year-to-year, 70% will be reserved for projects requiring 100% City financing. The remainder of the allocated City funds will be reserved for projects which require cost sharing by the residents. The funding split of 70% and 30% is subject to revision based on the need to undertake highest priority projects. City funding participating will proceed in descending order from the top of the priority list until all annual funds are allocated to projects. Upon receipt of residents' share (if any) and allotment of City's share (if any), the selected traffic calming device shall be installed as scheduling permits. Once funds have been committed for a particular project, the funding shall not be withdrawn unless so requested in writing by the petitioner(s). The construction of the traffic calming device and the associated placement of signs and markings shall conform to the current design standards as established by the Traffic Engineering Division. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAUERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 13 SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this resolution shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrases, word or provision of this resolution. It is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication will be made one time in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi by publishing the caption stating in substance the purpose of the ordinance. This ordinance will be effective upon publication. H:\LEG-DIR\DIANNAVERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 14 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the ,4/-/ day of 2p4,t.1 , 1998, by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Alex L. Garcia, Jr. Dr. Arnold Gonzales L Betty Jean Longoria (1.1} i LF John Longoria &L % Edward A. Martin LAO 0 Dr. David McNichols ) That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the X it, day of (.Lp' i _y , 1998, by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Alex L. Garcia, Jr. Betty Jean Longoria John Longoria Edward A. Martin Dr. David McNichols (ibSuLf- Dr. Arnold Gonzales - (Of' PASSED AND APPROVED, this the A)f /1 day of L(pL i , 1998. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, r. Mayor, City of Corpus Christi APPROVED THIS ATI) DAY OF (byt.t / , 1998. JAMES R. BRAY, JR., CITY ATTORNEY Gerard V. D'Alessio, Jr. Assistant City Attorney By: H;LEG-DIR\DIANNAVERRY\ORD\005.ORD (dkw) April 20, 1998 1:24PM 023289 15 State of Texas County of Nueces } } PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ss: Ad # 2071250 PO # Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, this day personally came Darrell G. Coleman, who being first duly sworn, according to law, says that he is Vice - President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corpus Christi Caller -Times, a daily newspaper published at Corpus Christi in said City and State, generally circulated in Aransas, Bee, Brooks, Duval, Jim Hogg, Jim Wells, Karnes, Kenedy, Kleberg, Live Oak, Nueces, Refugio, San Patricio, Victoria and Webb Counties, and that the publication of, NOTICE OF PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE NO. which the annexed is a true copy, was inserted in the Corpus Christi Caller - ?times and on the World Wide Web on the Caller -Times Interactive on the 4TH day(s) of MAY 1998. TWO (2 ) Time(s) $31.75 Corpus Christi Caller -Times, Monday, May 4, 1998 1110 Legal Notices NOTICE OF PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE NO. 023289 Amending the Code of Ordi- $ nances, City of Corpus Christi, Chapter 53 - Traffic, Article IV - TreHfc Control Devices, by adding Division II -- Residen- tial Traffic Calming Devices. This ordinance was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Corpus -3 Christi on April 28, 19Q1ft. I,/Arroando Chepa Cfty CiCorpus City of Christi Ori., 0 3(2g Vice -President and Chief Financial Officer Subscribed and sworn to me on the date of MAY 05, 1998. Notary Public, Nueces County, Texas CONNIE HARALSON Print or Type Name of Notary Public My commission expires on 5/14/01.