HomeMy WebLinkAbout025811 RES - 06/29/2004A RESOLUTION
GRANTING A VARIANCE, UNDER SECTION 4-5(F) OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, TO MIRRNA ELODIA PIETSCH AND GILBERTO
GONZALEZ, JR., TO OPERATE AN ON-PREMISE ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED AT 5702 SOUTH STAPLES
STREET, SUITE #E6.
WHEREAS, Mirrna Elodia Pietsch and Gilberto Gonzalez, Jr., in partnership ("Pietsch &
Gonzalez"), desire to develop a restaurant on property located at 5702 South Staples
Street, Suite #E6, which is situated within the corporate limits of the City of Corpus
Christi ("City");
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez desire to allow on-premise sales of alcoholic bever-
ages at the location;
WHEREAS, the location of Pietsch & Gonzalez's proposed business is within 300 feet
of a day-care center;
WHEREAS, as allowed under Section 109.33(a)(1) of the Texas Alcohol and Beverage
Code ("TAB Code"), the City enacted Section 4-5(a) of the City's Code of Ordinances
("Code") to prohibit any person from maintaining a business for the dispensing and sale
for on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages within the corporate limits of the
City within 300 feet of any-day care center;
WHEREAS, Section 109.33(e) of the TAB Code and Section 4-5(f) of the Code allow
the City Council ("Council"), upon application of a business regulated by Section 4-5 of
the Code, to grant a variance to the alcohol regulations contained within the section if
the Council determines that enforcement of the regulation in a particular instance is not
in the best interest of the public, constitutes waste or inefficient use of land or other
resources, creates an undue hardship on an applicant for a license or permit, does not
serve its intended purpose, is not effective or necessary, or for any other reason, and,
after consideration of the health, safety, and welfare of the public and the equities of the
situation, determines it is in the best interest of the community;
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez have formally applied to the City for a variance under
Section 4-5(0;
WHEREAS, there are presently two establishments within close proximity to Pietsch &
Gonzalez's proposed location that provide on-premise sales of alcoholic beverages;
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez believe and state that enforcement of the regulation, in
this particular instance, is not in the best interest of the public;
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez believe and state that enforcement of the regulation, in
this particular instance, constitutes waste and inefficient use of the land and other re-
sources;
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez believe and state that enforcement of the regulation, in
this particular instance, creates an undue hardship on the applicants for a license or
permit;
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez believe and state that enforcement of the regulation, in
this particular instance, does not serve its intended purpose;
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez believe and state that enforcement of the regulation, in
this particular instance, is not effective or necessary; and,
WHEREAS, Pietsch & Gonzalez request that the Council grant the variance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The City Council has determined that enforcement of Section 4-5(a) of the
Code of Ordinances, in this particular instance, is not in the best interest of the public
and, after consideration of the health, safety, and welfare of the public, grants the vari-
ance in the best interest of the community.
SECTION 2. The City Council has determined that enforcement of Section 4-5(a) of the
Code of Ordinances, in this particular instance, constitutes waste and inefficient use of
the land and other resources and, after consideration of the health, safety, and welfare
of the public, grants the variance in the best interest of the community.
SECTION 3. The City Council has determined that enforcement of Section 4-5(a) of the
Code of Ordinances, in this particular instance, creates an undue hardship on the appli-
cants for a license or permit and, after consideration of the health, safety, and welfare of
the public, grants the variance in the best interest of the community.
SECTION 4. The City Council has determined that enforcement of Section 4-5(a) of
the Code of Ordinances, in this particular instance, does not serve its intended purpose
and, after consideration of the health, safety, and welfare of the public, grants the vari-
ance in the best interest of the community.
SECTION 5. The City Council has determined that enforcement of Section 4-5(a) of
the Code of Ordinances, in this particular instance, is not effective or necessary and,
after consideration of the health, safety, and welfare of the public, grants the variance in
the best interest of the community.
ATFEST:
Arma~~
City Secretary
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
.~a~b//~,/~R~e ~ ~7~'~
A:sis~t (~;ty Afforney ~
for the Ci~ A~orney
,2O04
Corpus Christi, Texas
of 'v--~-~
,2004
The above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garret/
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H:~LEG-DIR~ehzab~th'~ept FJles~EH Resolutions~EHres143.doc
a25511
Fl':thY, g£ [~.p~,~j,I~.CC, PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT
State of Texas ~ CI~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI
County of Nueces ~, ss: Ad ~ 4925634
PO ~
Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, this day personally came Diana
Hinoiosa, who being first duly sworn, according to law, says that she is Credit
Manager of the Corpus Christ~ Caller-Trines, a daily newspaper published at
Corpus Christi in said Ci.ty and State, generally circulated in Aransas, Bee,
Brooks, Duval, Jim Hogg, ,Jim Wells, Karnes, Kenedy, Kleberg, Live Oak,
Nueces, Refug~o, San Patricio, Victoria and Webb Counties, and that the
publication of, NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE which the annexed is a
true copy, was inserted in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times and on the World
Wide Web on the Caller-Times Interoctive on the 19TH day(s) of JUNE, 2004.
$86.50
TWO (2) Time(s)
Credit Manager
Subscribed and sworn to me on the date of
JUNE 21. 2004.
Notary Public, Nueces County, Texas
ROSA MARIA FLORES
Print or Type Name of Notary Public
My commission expires on 04/23/05.
/Corpus Chrtst~ Caller-Times, Saturday, June 19, 2004
NOTICE IS HERE~Y
GIVEN TO THE
PUBUC b'~ s pubic
hear~ on b~e mqu*~
Io consider
v~ lo ~
b e v e rag e
e~ ~
, _~o~s Chri~