HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 06/19/2001CITY
COUNCIL
AGENDA
cCity of
orDllS
·
Chnst
June 19, 2001
Public Comment on matters not scheduled on the agenda will be heard at approximately 5:30 p.m.
or at the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier.
1:45 p.m.
Goodwill Ambassador Certificates - Corpus Christi Sister Cities Exchange Students
Swearing-in of newly appointed Board, Commission and Committee members
AGENDA
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1201 LEOPARD
JUNE 19, 2001
12:00 P.M.
PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE
PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 5:30 p.m. or at the end of the
Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address.
Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please
present it to the City Secretary.
Si ud. Desea dirigirae al Concilio y cree que su ingl~s es limitado, habr~ un int~rprete ingl~s-espafiol en todas las juntas del
Concilio para ayudarle.
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact
the City Secretary's office (at 36'1 880-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
A. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. to call the meeting to order.
B. Invocation to be given by Dr. Ray Kiser, First United Methodist Church.
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States.
D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers.
Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Henry Garrett
Council Members:
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Manager David R. Garcia
City Attorney James R. Bray, Jr.
City Secretary Armando Chapa
E. MINUTES.'.
1. Approval of Regular Meeting of June 12, 2001. (Attachment #1)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 2
2,5.
.0.
BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE)
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into
executive session at any time during the meeting in orderto discuss matters
listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open
Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. In the event the
Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the
section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive
session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer.
Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section
551.071 for legal advice regarding claim of Rosario Prado, Individually
and on behalf of the estate of Robert Prado, deceased with possible
discussion and action related thereto in open session.
Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section
551.071 for legal advice regarding Priscilla G. Leal v. the City of
Corpus Christi, et al No. 01-0253-E, 148th District Court, Nueces
County, Texas, with possible discussion and action related thereto in
open session.
Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section
551.071 for legal advice regarding advertising on bus benches within
City rights-of-way, with possible discussion and action related thereto
in open session.
EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION:
For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as
motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council
will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may finally pass
an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two
reading ordinance; or may modify the action specified. A motion to
reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a
subsequent special meeting; such agendas are incorporated herein for
reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 3
CONSENT AGENDA
Notice to the Public
The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been
furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been
discussed at a previous meeting. Ail items will be acted upon by one vote without
being discussed separately un/ess requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in
which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual
consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate
discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items wi//be adopted by one
vote.
CONSENT MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES
FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
(At this point the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not
removed for individual consideration.)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a
construction contract with Haeber Roofing, Corpus Christi, Texas, for
a total fee not to exceed $141,214 for the Health Department Roof
Repairs (Bond Issue Project Al). (Attachment #3)
Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 1,173-square foot portion, of
a ten-foot wide utility easement out of Lot 9, Arbor Terrace
Subdivision; requiring the owner, Mr. Gregg Kupec (Owner), to comply
with the specified conditions and replat the property within 180 days
at owner's expense. (Attachment ~4)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant
application in the amount of $25,000 to the State of Texas
Comptroller of Public Accounts for tobacco compliance and
prevention activities. (Attachment #5)
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
a MasterAgreement Governing Local Transportation Project Advance
Funding Agreements with the Texas Department of Transportation.
(Attachment #6)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept funding
in the amount of $5,884 from the Texas Department of Health, Toxic
Substances Control Division, Hazard Communications Branch for the
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summa~,)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 4
8,5,
Jo
Corpus Christi - Nueces County Local Emergency Planning Committee
to conduct planning and response activities under the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. (Attachment #7)
Ordinance appropriating $5,884 from the Texas Department of Health,
Toxic Substances Control Division, Hazard Communications Branch
in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for the Corpus Christi -
Nueces County Local Emergency Planning Committee to conduct
planning and response activities under the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act. (Attachment #7)
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a
grant application to the Texas General Land Office - Coastal
Coordination Council for in the amount of $60,000 for a Hike and Bike
Trail on Gypsy Street, with a $40,000 match from Padre Island
Property Owners Association. (Attachment #8)
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a
grant application to the Texas General Land Office - Coastal
Coordination Council for a Hike and Bike Trail on Encantada Avenue
in the amount $60,000, with a $40,000 match from Padre Island
Property Owners Association. (Attachment #8)
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a
grant application to the Texas General Land Office - Coastal
Coordination Council for a Bayfront Redevelopment Study in the
amount of $50,000, with a $33,333 cash match and a for a total
project cost of $83,333. (Attachment #8)
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Case No. 0501-02, Dunhill Enterprises, L.L.C.: A change of zoning
from an "A-1" Apartment House District to "R-1B" One-family Dwelling
District on Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section
52, Lot 15, located on the north side of Yorktown Boulevard,
approximately 650 feet east of Waldron Road. (Attachment #9)
Planninq Commission's and Staff's Recommendation: Approval.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 5
10.
L.
11.
12.
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Dunhill
Enterprises, L.L.C., by changing the Zoning Map in reference to Lot
15, Section 52, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, from
"A-1" Apartment House District to "R-1 B" One-Family Dwelling District;
amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from
the existing comprehensive plan.
PRESENTATIONS:
Public comment will not be solicited on Presentation items.
July 4th Big Bang Celebration (Attachment #10)
SPECIAL BUDGET PRESENTATION:
Resolution approving the FY2001-2002 Budget for the Corpus Christi
Crime Control and Prevention District. (Attachment #11)
(Public comment will not be solicited on Budget issues until the Public
Hearing and First and Second Readings of Budget Ordinance.)
FY2001-2002 Budget Discussion Session - Enterprise Funds
(Attachment #12)
*Utility System
Water/Storm Water
Wastewater
Gas
*Other Enterprise Funds:
Airport Fund
Ambulance Fund
Marina Fund
Golf Centers Fund
Third Golf Course Options
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legencl at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 6
*General Fund Continued: Police Department
(Solid Waste Services scheduled for review on June 26, 2001
in conjunction with considered of new disposal contracts.)
M. REGULAR AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES:
13. Resolution establishing a City of Corpus Christi Sesquicentennial
Celebration Advisory Committee to consider and propose activities,
events, and promotions to recognize the 150th Anniversary of the City.
(Attachment # 13)
N. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT
SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT
APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. OR AT THE END OF THE COUNCIL
MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASE LIMIT
PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN TO
ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD, PLEASE
SIGN THE FORM AT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER,
GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A recording is made of
the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and
state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining
to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary.)
Si usted se dirige a la junta y cree que su ingl~s es limitado, habr~ un int~rprete
ingl~s-espaf~ol en la reunion de la junta para ayudarle.
PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF
PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE,
EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL
DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL
MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC A T ANY COUNCIL MEETING.
REPORTS:
The following reports include questions by Council to Staff regarding City
policies or activities; request by Council for information or reports from Staff;
reports of activities of individual Council members and Staff; constituent
concerns; current topics raised by media; follow-up on Staff assignments;
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 7
scheduling of future Council meetings and activities; and other brief
discussions regarding city-related matters.
14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
15.
16.
P.
NOTE:
* Upcoming Items
MAYOR'S UPDATE
COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
POSTING STATEMENT:
This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board at the front entrance to
City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, at 1:45 p.m., June 15 ,2001.
Armando Chapa f~z ',
City Secretary
The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home
Page at www.ci.corpus-christi.tx.us after 7:00 p.m. on the
Friday before regularly scheduled council meetings. If
technical problems occur, the agenda will be uploaded on
the Internet by Monday morning.
Symbols used to highlight action item that implement
council priority issues.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summarT)
2001-2002
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
AND
PRIORITY ISSUES
I ~'~CONTINUING PRIORITY ISSUES
Airport / Seawall / Convention Center / Arena
* Continue quarterly reporting process for these initiatives.
'86 Bond Issue Improvements
· Update status on Senior Centers.
· Provide communication on completion of these projects (e.g. "Report to the Community").
· Continue community involvement on issues such as Leopard Street improvements.
Privatization / Re-Engineering
· Clearly define "privatization' and "re-engineering."
· Make decisions regarding privatization and re-engineering in the next 12-24 months, with
discussions within 90 days.
· Establish process to identify what services can and cannot be privatized.
* Continue focus on park maintenance.
Finance
· Maintain the 5-year forecast model.
· Review the August 1 budget adoption deadline.
Crime Control and Prevention
· Continue implementation of the Community Policing initiative.
Establish date for Crime Control and Prevention District election.
Continue City participation in Youth Opportunities United and other youth crime initiatives.
Employee Health Care
· Address concerns related to employee compensation and benefits, including health insurance.
· Work to coordinate Police and Fire health benefits with those of other City employees
Economic Development Sales Tax
· Establish election date.
Storm Water Utility
· Reconsider implementation plan for a Storm Water Utility.
Packery Channel
· Continue quarterly reports on the progress of the TIF and Beach Restoration Project.
Landfill
· Continue to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of operations.
· Examine alternatives for solid waste management system, including privatization.
Internet
· Continue regular updates and expansion of the City's web site, including individual council
member web pages.
· Establish target date for online permitting process.
· Communicate brush pickup via e-mail.
CDBG
· Continue active role.
Frost Bank Building
· Lease and complete renovation
Annexation Plan
· Implement current island annexation plan
ADA Transition Plan
· Develop and approve ADA Transition Plan within 90 days.
Redistricting
· Develop Council-approved redistricting plan for the City of Corpus Christi
Industrial District Contract
· Review Industrial District contracts and determine date for approval
Council Action Items
· Staff completes action requests in a timely manner.
Cit~ / County Health Issues
· Continue discussions with County to determine structure and process for the most effective
and efficient delivery of health services
Marketing of CC Museum and Columbus Ships
· Continue to develop marketing plans for the Museum of Science and History and the
Columbus Fleet
NEW PRIORITY INITIATIVES AND ISSUES
City staff will develop and present to City Council action/implementation plans for the following priority
areas:
Desalination Pilot Project
*Code Enforcement in Trashy Neighborhoods
*Employee Classification Study
Ma ster Drainage Plan
i~. Garwood Water
*New Golf Course
*Charter Revision with Specific Charge(s)
*More Funding for Economic Development
*Fire and Police Contracts
New Funding Sources / Plan for Inner City Improvements
~ Improve Permitting Process (online / customer service)
~Pa~e Island Development Plan
Downtown / South Central Development Plan (marina, t-heads, breakwater)
Housing Emphasis / Process (older neighborhoods, working class neighborhoods)
**Road Projects
Southside Traffic Plan
Relationships with Other Governments
Development Initiative Packages
*Park Rehabilitation
*Leopard Street Curbs and Gutters
Economic Development Summit and Post-Summit Meetings
Agnes-Laredo Corridor Market (studies, plans)
*Solid waste / Pickup
Base Closures
**Northwest Library
Northside Development Plan
Traffic Controls (channeling, studying on/off ramps on SPID)
*Five Points Ambulance
Effluent Plan for Leopard Medians
RTA--Public Improvements
Arts and Sciences Park Plan
Budget Item
** Capital Improvement Program Item
1
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
12:03 p.m.
PRESENT
Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Henry Garrett
Council Members:
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kiunison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Staff.'
City Manager David R. Garcia
Deputy City Manager George Noe
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Assistant City Attorney Jay Reining
Recording Secretary Rachelle P. Ram6n
Mayor Neal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
The invocation was delivered by Council Member Chesney and the Pledge of Allegiance to
the United States flag was led by Council Member Kinnison. City Secretary Chapa called the roll
and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present
to conduct the meeting. Mayor Neal called for approval of the minutes of the City Council retreat
meeting of May 7, 2001 and the regular Council meeting of May 29, 2001. A motion was made and
passed to approve the minutes as presented.
Mayor Neal referred to the board and committee appointments on the day's agenda, and the
following appointments were made:
Water/Shore Advisory Committee
Terri Nicolau (Reappointed)
Roy Pell (Reappointed)
Dr. Oscar Garcia (Reappoimed)
Dan Leyendecker
Civil Service Board/Commigsion
Cydney Farrar (Reappointed)
Food Service Advisory Committee
Suzanne Gilliam (Reappointed)
Gabriel Hemandez (Reappointed)
Ethics Commission
Harold Fredrickson
Corn_ us Christi Convention and Visitors B~rean
David Prewitt
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 2
Mayor Neal called for consideration o£ the consent agenda (Items 3-14). Council members
requested that Items 4 and 6 be discusse6. *'here were no comments from the audience. City
Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their '*tes and the following were passed:
3. M2001-217
Motion approving supply agreements for vehicle and equipment tires and tubes in accordance
with Bid Invitation No. BI-0130-01, with the following companies for the following
amounts. Awards are based on low bid or only bid, for multiple progressive awards, for a
total estimated annual expenditure of $527,521.72. The term of the contracts will be for
twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods
subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have
been budgeted by Maintenance Services and the Fire Department in FY00-01.
A to Z Tire and Battery
Comus Christi. TX
Items: 1.1-1.5, 1.7, 1.12-1.14,
1.18, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 4.1, 4.8,
4.10-4.12, 4.15, 4.17, 5.1, 5.2,
6.1, 6.2, 7.1, 8.2, 9.1, 9.3,
10.1-10.4, 11.1, 11.2
$302,843.32
Goodyear Tim & Rubber Co.
Comus Christi. TX
Items: 1.8-1.11, 1.15-1.17,
1.19, 2.2, 4.2, 4.4-4.7, 4.9,
4.16, 4.18, 6.3, 7.2, 8.1, 8.3-8.5
$85,148.90
Wingfoot
Comus Christi. TX
Items: 4.3, 4.13, 4.14, 4.19, 9.2
$133,082.50
Delta Tire & Wheel
Comus Christi. TX
Item: 1.6
$6,447.00
Grand Total:
$527,521.72
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
5. M2001-217
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an engineering services
contract in the amount of $22 L413 with Bass & Welsh Engineering for the following
projects: Up River Road For,~:: Main Replacement near Callicoate Road, and Sharpsburg
Wastewater Subsystem Servicc Plan.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
7.a. M2001-219
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 8 to the
architectural contract for testing services in the deductive amount of ($132,344) with M.
Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates for the Corpus Christi International Airport terminal project.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 3
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the
contract for engineering laboratory, construction materials testing, and inspection services
in the amount of $107,625.50 with Professional Service Industries, Inc. for the Corpus
Christi International Airport terminal project.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
8.a. RESOLUTION NO. 024471
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept the Federal Aviation
Administration Grant No. 3-48-0051-32-01 in the amount of $1,950,400, to construct the
Terminal Apron - Phase II and improve the Airfield Lighting Control System at Corpus
Christi International Airport.
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
8.b. ORDINANCE NO. 024472
Ordinance appropriating $1,950,400 from the Federal Aviation Administration Grant No. 3-
48-0051-32-01 in the No. 3020 Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the Terminal Apron
Improvements Project - Phase II and Airfield Lighting Improvements Project; appropriating
$53,000 in the No. 4621 Passenger Facility Charge Fund for the Airfield Lighting Control
System.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
M2001-22!
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract in
the amount of $355,260 to Scott Electric Company of Corpus Christi, Texas for the Corpus
Christi International Airport Airfield Lighting Improvements Project, Airfield Lighting
Control System.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kiunison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 4
ORDINANCE NO. 024473
Ordinance appropriating $54,552 from the Federal Aviation Administration Grant No. 3-48-
0051-30-00, Amendment No. 2 in the No. 3020 Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the
purchase of replacement Airfield Rescue Fire Fighting Truck and Personal Protective
Clothing at Corpus Christi International Airport.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
10. RESOLUTION NO. 024474
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 3 to the
Federal Aviation Administration Grant No. 3 -48-005 I-31-00 amending the scope of work
of the Terminal Apron Improvements Project, def'med as "Construct Terminal Apron - Phase
I; Airfield Lighting Controls, Installation of Hold Position Markings" by adding the language
"Construct Airfield Access Roads, Phase II and Installation of Elevated Guard Lights."
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
11. M2001-222
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a maintenance agreement
with Hewlett-Packard Company in the amount of $23,481.51 for maintenance of the
hardware and operating system of the Municipal Court's computer management system,
based on sole source. The term of the agreement is for 12 months.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
12.a. ~
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the amount of
$88,500 to implement a communications program for the prevention of underage drinking,
substance abuse and impaired driving, pending final approval from the Texas Department
of Transportation.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
12.b. ORDINANCE NO. 024475
Ordinance appropriating $88,500 from Texas Department of Transportation in the No. 1050
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 5
State and Federal Grant Fund to implement a communications program for the prevention
of underage drinking, substance abuse and impaired driving.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
13.a. M2001-224
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept the Community Outdoor
Outreach Program (CO-OP) Grant in the amount of $30,000 from the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department to provide outdoor recreation programs for youth participating in the
City's summer programs.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
13.b. ORDINANCE NO. 024476
Ordinance appropriating a grant in the amount of $30,000 in the No. 1050 Federal/State
Grants Fund from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to operate the community
outdoor outreach program to operate an outdoor recreation program for youth participating
in the City's summer program.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Neal,
Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
14.
Motion setting a Public Hearing on the proposed FY01-02 Operating Budget during the
Regular Council Meeting of June 26, 2001.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neai, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kirmison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 4, purchase of liquid chlorine. Responding to a
question from the Mayor, Mr. Mike Barrera, Procurement & General Services Manager, explained
that 13 bid invitations were issued and two were received. In addition to the low bidder (Altivia),
the other bid received was from DPC Industries of Corpus Christi, which bid $168 per ton for a total
bid price of $181,440. Mr. Barrera said DPC's bid was $2,160 more than Altivia's bid of $179,280.
In reply to Council Member Noyola, Mr. Barrera said the majority of the city's procurements
fall under the state bid invitation statutes. Council Member Chesney asked about the difference
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 6
between bids and proposals. Mr. Barrera said that bid invitations (such as this one) fall under
Chapter 252 of the Texas Local Government Code and requests for proposals fall under the
Professional Services Procurement Act. He said the law dictates that the entity issuing the bid
invitation has to accept the lowest responsible bid, while criteria other than price can be used for
proposals received. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
Motion approving a supply agreement with Altivia, Houston, Texas in accordance with Bid
Invitation No. BI-0131-01, for approximately 1,080 tons of liquid chlorine based on low bid
for an estimated annual expenditure of $179,280. The term of the agreement shall be for
twelve months with an option to extend for up to two (2) additional twelve-month periods,
subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. This chemical
will be used by the Water Department for treatment of our water supply. Funds have been
budgeted in FY00-01.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Gat'rea,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 6, Ennis Joslin road improvements. Responding to
Council Member Kinnison, Mr. Kevin Stowers, Assistant Director of Engineering Services, said the
amount escrowed with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) is based on their
engineers' estimate of what the bids will be. The amount in the street area was under-escrowed and
the bids came in higher than estimated by TXDOT. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their
votes as follows:
6. M2001-218
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to increase the escrow amount as a
result of higher bid prices than estimated and to execute Change Orders Nos. 10, 13, and 24
with the Texas Department of Transportation in the amount of $205,649.76 as part of the
Spur 3, Phase 2 Ennis Joslin/Nile Drive construction contract in accordance with the
Advanced Funding Agreement.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal referred to the presentations on the day's agenda. The first presentation (Item
15) was regarding the city's sesquicentennial (150th) anniversary. Mr. Tony Cisneros, Director of
Park and Recreation, explained that on September 9, 1852, the first City Council elections were held.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 7
Since the actual 150th anniversary date of September 9, 2002 falls on a Monday, one of the questions
to be answered is whether the celebration should be instead held on Sunday, September 8th or
whether sesquicentennial events should be planned throughout the 2002 year.
Mr. Cisneros said other details to consider are the location of the event(s); whether the city
should commission a design for a totally new city seal as part of the 150th anniversary activities; and
whether the Council should appoint an auxiliary committee for special fundraising efforts.
In response to Mayor Neal, Mr. Herb Canales, Director of Lihraries, said the Central Library
has a rare "bird's-eye view" map of Corpus Christi from 1887, which has been preserved using
private funds. He said the Friends of the Library want to duplicate that map and sell it as a
sesquicentennial poster. He added that the Nueces County Historical Society would be a very good
group to work with in planning the city's sesquicentennial.
Replying to Council Member Colmenero, Mr. Cisneros said city staff has not specifically
approached the Bayfest organizers about tying in their event with any sesquicentennial activities. Mr.
Colmenero commented that planners will have to be creative in identifying funding sources and he
suggested that they consider creating a commemorative seal for the anniversary.
Council Member Kelly noted that when the state of Texas celebrated its sesquicentennial,
they sold posters of historical figures and that idea can be utilized for local historical figures, such
as Alonzo de Pineda, Gen. Zachary Taylor, and Col. Henry Lawrence Kinney. Council Member
Chesney suggested that the Council members appoint members to a planning committee that can
work with entities such as the Bayfest and Buccaneer coordinators. The Mayor asked the Council
to appoint two people each and he asked staff to bring this issue back to the Council next week.
City Manager Garcia arrived at the meeting and explained that he had attended the Nueces
County Commissioners Court meeting because they were discussing the extra $1.50 on vehicle
registration fees to help offset the cost of the school crossing guard program. (This issue was
discussed again later in the meeting; see page 9 of the minutes.)
The second presentation (Item 16) was made by Mr. Mark McDaniel, Director of
Management and Budget, regarding the following: the FY 2000-01 third quarter financial
performance report; the five-year General Fund financial forecast; and an overview of the FY 2001-
02 General Fund proposed budget.
Using a computer presentation, Mr. McDaniel first discussed the third quarter financial
report. He said the total FY00-01 revenues and expenditures through the end of April are consistent
with FY01-02 proposed budget estimates. Responding to Mayor Neal, Mr. McDaniel said the
expenditures are set up in 12 equal periods and revenues are budgeted on a period basis according
to historical trends. He said staff has provided an executive summary and details and he agreed that
an intermediate step describing the detail would be helpful to have.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 8
City Manager Garcia said that once the Council approves the budget, it is the responsibility
of the Budget Office and the executives to manage it, which is one of the criteria he uses to evaluate
the senior staffmembers. Mr. Garcia said these budget tools are substantially better than the city had
two years ago. He said the City of Corpus Christi has historically not been very sophisticated in
projecting its internal expenditures on a departmental basis.
Mr. Garcia went on to say that the budget has two problem areas: the Police Department and
the Solid Waste Department. He said staff has been tracking the drop in revenue at the landfill and
keeping the Council apprised of that situation, but the Police Department had unexpected expenses,
one of which was "drag-up" pay (the payment for accrued vacation and sick leave when employees
retire or resign). Mayor Neal said the quarterly financial reconciliation should indicate if a
department's budget is experiencing difficulties.
Council Member Scott complimented Municipal Court for having an increase in revenues
of $375,166 over the year to date budgeted amount of $2,646,388. He also asked how the Police
Department ended up being over budget. Mr. McDaniel said he had a handout which explains the
areas that the Police Department exceeded their budget.
Responding to Council Member Kiunison, Mr. McDaniel said that originally the software
system had a lock-out provision preventing departments from exceeding their budgets in each line
item, which resulted in the need for multiple transfers between line items. He said staff decided to
remove the lock-out provision and give department heads the responsibility of managing their
budgets, which are monitored by the Budget Office and reported to the Council on a quarterly basis.
Mr. Garcia said the Council approves the budget after which, through the course of the year,
staff does not bring every budget change to the Council. He said they do inform the Council about
major additions or deletions to the budget. Council Member Kelly highlighted specific departments
that were either over-budget or under-budget and he said it would be helpful to have an "executive
variance report" in the quarterly report.
In reply to Council Member Chesney, Mr. McDaniel said the variance in the Police
Department is an expenditure issue and the variance in the Solid Waste Department is a revenue
issue. Responding to another question from Mr. Chesney, Mr. McDaniel said the Police Department
is by far the city's largest department with a projected budget of approximately $43 million and a
$1 million over-expenditure is fairly significant. Council Member Colmenero said he is looking
forward to an explanation of the variances.
Mr. McDaniel then continued with his computer presentation about the forecast for the fiscal
years 2002-06, which includes the following revenue assumptions: 2.5% annual increase in property
taxes; 3% annual growth in sales tax receipts; a significant decrease in electric franchise fee
payments beginning in mid-FY01-02 due to the implementation of the deregulation legislation and
0.25% annual growth thereafter; a $1.7 million decrease in Solid Waste disposal fees for FY01-02
and a 2% growth thereafter; and an average of 2% growth for all other revenues.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 9
Mr. McDaniel said the five-year expenditure assumptions are: no salary increases figured into
the baseline projection after FY01-02; 10% annual growth in group health insurance costs after
FY01-02; major increase in power, light, heat and fuel programmed for FY01-02 and 2% growth
thereafter; no major capital or equipment expenditures factored into the baseline projection other
than police patrol units, mobile data terminals, fire trucks, and other routine items; and a 2.5%
average increase for all other expenditures.
The Budget Director said this forecast contains some different figures from those in the
proposed budget. He said staff is suggesting revising the numbers in the General Fund as follows:
electric franchise fee revenue increase - $200,000; additional 0.5% increase in the tax value -
$242,125; new development-related fees - $100,000; delay repayment to the Insurance Fund for the
tire fire claim - $155,000; and reduce the landfill cell opening reserve - $136,151, for a total of
$833,277. He said now revenues equal expenditures and those figures are reflected in the five-year
forecast, which he explained.
Mr. MeDaniel said that emerging issues include the restructure of the Health Department's
clinical services effective in October 2001; new Solid Waste disposal contracts at reduced tipping
rates effective in June 2001 and new hauler/fee assessments effective in July 2001; implementation
of the compensation study recommendations after FY01-02; and the annexation effective in January
2002 and programming of annexation costs beginning in FY02-03. He noted that the forecast is
intended to be a financial planning tool and includes conservative projections which depict a "worst-
case" scenario. Mr. Kinnison said it is unrealistic to not program cost-of-living adjustments (COLA)
for employees, some of which may be warranted by the compensation study.
The last portion of Mr. McDaniel's presentation was the General Fund overview for the
FY01-02 proposed budget. He said staff originally proposed a 5.0% unreserved fund balance and
with the inclusion of the changes he mentioned previously, they are adjusting it to be 5.7%. He also
discussed the net assessed taxable value of $7.84 million; distribution of the tax rate of.6637260 per
$100 assessed value; sales tax revenues of $32.6 million; franchise fees of $1.2 million for cable,
$10.1 million for CPL and $5.2 million for telecommunications; Solid Waste Services combined
revenue of $19 million; industrial district valuations, which have basically remained flat; Municipal
Court revenues of $4.1 million; and other General Fund revenues - child safety fee and fee/rate
increases in Environmental Health, Animal Control, and recreation activities. A brief discussion
followed about the industrial districts.
Mayor Neal called for a brief recess to read the proclamations.
Upon reconvening, Mr. Garcia said that during the Commissioner's Court meeting, the
commissioners voted to remove the $1.50 fee for the school crossing guards, which will result in a
decrease in the amount staff budgeted for that program in FY01-02. Responding to Mr. Kinnison,
he said the fee is imposed on a calendar-year basis. He added that staff will bring back a
recommendation on how to prioritize the use of available funds. Mr. Garrett suggested that staff ask
the school districts to help pay for the school crossing guards.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 10
Returning to his presentation, Mr. McDaniel said that General Fund expenditures include a
line item for salary adjustments (COLA, merit, and shift differential) throughout the General Fund
departments totaling $2.9 million, and a total of $1 million in group insurance increases. He said that
overall, staff is budgeting a 3% increase in Citicare and Citicare Q-Plus, 19% in Citicare Fire and
54% in Citicare Public Safety. In addition, the General Fund new and existing program
enhancements are expected to cost $2.9 million, while the impact of the Health Department
restructuring will be better known next month.
Police Chief Pete Alvarez then referred to the handout summarizing expenditure variances
in the Police Department, including the current year versus the year-end estimates and the current
year budget versus the proposed budget. He explained that the department has always had difficulty
anticipating how many officers will be retiring or leaving, which affects the drag-up pay line item
in the budget. The Chief said they plan to implement a system based on historical figures to address
this problem in the future.
Responding to Mr. Chesney, Chief Alvarez said that for FY00-01 the drag-up pay amount
is $694',373. Mr. McDaniel said the additional cost for retirement raises that figure to almost
$800,000, while about $150,000 to $200,000 was actually budgeted for drag-up pay. He said taking
into account the amount that was budgeted for police positions that were unfilled and other factors,
the net over-expenditure in salaries and wages is projected to be $212,617 through the end of the
fiscal year on July 31st. He said the total amount of over-expenditures in the Police Department is
projected to be $1,261,156. Mr. Chesney said if those figures are accurate, the City Manager should
hold the Police Chief accountable to explain every single cost and how cost overruns are approved.
Referring to the over-expended overtime costs of $481,216, Chief Alvarez said most of those
costs are reimbursed through grants. He said this is the first time the department has been operating
with nine separate grants. Mr. McDaniel said the figures in the handout are net amounts. Mr. Garrett
noted that there are several vacancies in Communications and Central Records, and he asked if the
vacancies were being filled through overtime costs; Chief Alvarez replied affirmatively.
Mr. Garcia said with regard to overtime costs, this was the first year the city was responsible
for security and traffic management at the Concrete Street Amphitheater and during large events such
as spring break and "C-Sculptures" on Padre Island. Chief Alvarez also addressed the $228,759 that
was not budgeted for the increase in vacation buy-backs and the $152,201 for the maintenance
agreement on the mobile data terminals/automated vehicle location systems. Ms. Pat Eldridge,
Management Assistant in the Police Department, also explained other over-expenditures.
Following a discussion about the methods used to determine the budget amounts, Mr.
McDaniel said the proposed FY01-02 Police Department budget figure is $43,562,396. Mr. Garcia
explained that there has been a change in the way staff accounts for reimbursements--now they are
classified as revenues. Mr. McDaniel pointed out that on page 128 of the proposed budget document,
both revenues and expenditures are listed and balance to the $43,562,396 figure.
Responding to Mr. Scott, Mr. McDaniel said the total budget for overtime in FY00-01 is $1.5
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 11
million. Mr. Scott questioned how staff could have underestimated overtime costs by $481,216 and
drag-up and other pay by $212,617. Mr. Garcia and Chief Alvarez reiterated that it is very difficult
to anticipate when people will retire. Mr. Kelly asked if staff debriefed the people who retired from
the Police Department this fiscal year to determine if they left because of dissatisfaction with the
department. Chief Alvarez said 15 people voluntarily left and two were terminated, and
dissatisfaction was not a factor among the former group. Further discussion ensued about overtime
and drag-up costs. Mayor Neal emphasized the importance of staff presenting uniform budget
figures. Mr. Garcia said staffwill provide additional detail next week.
Council members then asked questions, to which staff responded, on the following General
Fund departments: City Attorney's, Communications and Quality Management, Internal Audit,
Municipal Court, Fire, and Park and Recreation. Additional discussion followed about a third
municipal golf facility, and several Council members said the proposed budget did not include
options for developing that facility. With regard to the new golf facility surcharge reserve, Mr.
Garcia explained that the Greens Committee wants that money to be used on existing golf courses
but staff intends to use it for a third golf course, which the Council authorized when the fund was
created. In accordance with Council direction, Mr. Garcia said staff will bring back a
recommendation to raise the greens fee to an amount that, in conjunction with the projected revenue
from a third golf course, will allow for the development of a viable financing package.
Mr. Kelly asked about the master drainage plan. Mr. Angel Escobar, Director of Engineering
Services, said consultants have been selected through the RFP process and negotiations are
underway. Staff will take their recommendation to the Stormwater Advisory Committee and then
to the Council in July. Mr. McDaniel said if the Council adopts the proposed COLA and merit pay
programs, those costs will be spread throughout the departments. Mr. Garcia noted that the Council
has already approved the creation of a "one-stop" services center in the Frost Bank building and staff
is evaluating how to reorganize existing functions to accommodate that plan.
Mayor Neal said staff is scheduled to provide budget presentations on Solid Waste Services
and an additional presentation on the Police Department. He called for a brief recess.
Upon reconvening, the Mayor referred to Item 17, the legislative update. Assistant City
Manager Tom Utter, Office of Intergovernmental Relations, distributed a copy of the city's approved
legislative program with an explanation of the status of the individual issues. Mr. Utter discussed
the following items: franchise fees; state hotel tax for beach maintenance; street accessibility
improvements; 911 fees; liability law; sales tax information; prompt payment statute; indemnity
provisions; mandated fees; municipal court costs; water; transportation; development; wind storm
insurance; marine archeological repository funding; regulation of location of manufactured housing;
affordable housing; historic courthouse preservation; nuisances; annexation and condemnation
authority; and dune protection.
Other issues addressed by Mr. Utter were higher education; regional public safety training
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 12
academy; South Texas/border initiative; fire control and prevention district; child safety registration
fee; photographic traffic signal enforcement; and 911 emergency service systems.
At 5:30 p.m. Mayor Neal asked Mr. Utter to suspend his presentation so the Council could
hear comments fi.om the audience.
Mr. J.E. O'Brien, 4130 Pompano, said the current budget schedule calls for adopting the
budget on July 17th, while the certified tax rolls fi.om the appraisal district are not required to be
submitted until July 25th. He quoted fi.om the City Charter regarding the requirement that
expenditures in the proposed budget will not exceed estimated revenues. He said the proposed FY
01-02 budget does not comply with the charter in that respect.
Mr. Leon Perez, 904 Buford, commented negatively about the city's proposed budget and
the Texas State Aquarium. He said the city needs a third golf course and should adequately
compensate police and firefighters.
Mr. Jack Gordy, 310 Norton St., referred to a November 2000 letter which he said states that
the city received $7,370.92 for illegal signs on bus benches in the rights-of-way. He said the city's
ordinance states that no signs will be permitted in the fight-of-way and no one can erect a sign
without a permit. He questioned how long the city will allow Cooper Advertising to violate the
ordinance and, as a result, the city is collecting bribes. Mr. Scott said he received a call that two of
Mr. Gordy's campaign signs are still up and Mr. Gordy said he will remove the signs.
Responding to Mr. Colmenero, Mr. Reining said Cooper Advertising has a contract with the
Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) and the city has an agreement with the RTA. He said staff
is not aware that Cooper Advertising is operating illegally. Council Members Chesney and Noyola
asked staff to provide Mr. Gordy with the information he is requesting. Mr. Chesney said Mr.
Gordy's comments about the city taking bribes includes the Council as well and he said that is not
a fair or proper statement to make.
Mr. R.F. Hasker, 1813 Wallace, said he is trying to understand the intent of the Council's
recent action to reimburse costs for the Packery Channel project. He said at some point the escalating
cost of Packery Channel will exceed the earning capacity of the tax increment financing zone (TIF).
In response to Mr. Hasker, Council Member Kinnison said the recommended FY01-02
budget includes $60,000 of revenue projected to come into the TIF and the Council has said it will
not spend more than the available revenue. He said the city is not selling bonds for that project at this
time. Responding to Council Member Scott, Mr. Hasker said he thought CCISD voted to participate
in the TIF, and Mr. Scott said they did not. Council Member Kelly said the TIF is being funded by
the increase in property values that will result in the improvements that are put on the land contained
in the TIF boundary. He said the city and other taxing entities will continue to collect taxes on the
property at their current values.
Mr. Anthony Nocella said he was appearing on behalf of Project TSA, which is asking the
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 13
Texas State Aquarium to reconsider its plans to create a dolphin exhibit in the near future. He said
a dolphin averages 100 miles a day swimming in the wild. He said a dolphin sanctuary should be
created rather than an exhibit. He said he and other members of Project TSA are on a fast tmtil
Saturday to draw attention to their cause.
Continuing with his legislative update, Mr. Utter highlighted the following issues: electric
industry deregulation; right-of-way control; effluent use; air quality; National Estuary Program;
regional water planning; personnel; military; Spaceport; economic development authority; design-
build; and procurement. Mr. Utter also discussed bills that were outside the city's legislative
program, including those regarding reverse auctions; liquor licenses; Texas bond law; and the Port
board expansion. He noted that redistricting did not pass and he commended Rep. Gene Seaman and
Rep. Vilma Luna, who was one of four Democrats to vote against the House bill. He also briefly
described SB 170, HB 782, and HB 1445. Mr. Utter commended the city's legislative delegation,
staff of the Texas Municipal League, city staff and the Council members for their support.
Mayor Neal thanked Mr. Utter for his efforts, which were even more important this year since
the city did not have outside lobbyists during this legislative session. The Mayor added that Mr. Utter
recently returned from Poland where he was a lecturer on behalf of the U.S. National Community
Development Association.
Mayor Neal asked Deputy City Manager Noe to address Mr. O'Brien's previous comments.
Mr. Noe said there were a number of suggestions staff discussed with the Cotmcil regarding the use
of excess fund balances for capital improvements. He said next week staff will be making a
presentation about that issue.
Mayor Neal called for the City Managers report. Mr. Garcia said that on June 13th at 11 a.m.
there will be a ceremony for the activation of the traffic signal at Lipes and Staples streets, which is
the first Bond 2000 project to be completed. He also delineated the upcoming budget workshops.
Mayor Neal called for Council concerns and reports.
Mr. Chesney reiterated his concern about the Police Department's budget, and he said he
hopes the County Commissioners will reconsider their decision and reinstate the $1.50 fee for the
crossing guard program.
Mr. Longoria said he and other Council members viewed an informative presentation given
by the Corpus Christi Army Depot and he said they are working with the Mayor's Office to show
that presentation to the rest of the Council. Mr. Longoria also asked about the public restrooms at
the T-Head being built by Landry's Restaurant. Mr. Cisneros reviewed a copy of the drawings.
In response to another question from Mr. Longoria, Mr. Ron Massey, Assistant City Manager
for Public Works and Utilities, explained the contract situation with the restoration of Corpus Christi
North Beach. Mr. Longoria also referred to staff's intention to issue a request for proposals for an
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
June 12, 2001
Page 14
artist for the seawall project. He said the designers of the convention center/arena projects have
already developed attractive designs for the north end of the seawall and he questioned the need for
an RFP for an artist. Following additional discussion, Mayor Neal said staff should ask the Arts and
Cultural Commission to provide their input on this issue.
Mr. Kelly asked if there was problem with the election of site council officers at the senior
centers. Mr. Garcia said staffwill provide a report. Mr. Scott said the Council received a letter from
the Kleberg law firm regarding the use of land for the arena. Mr. Garcia replied that staff is
researching that issue, which surfaces periodically and dates back to the original dedication of the
property. Mr. Noyola reported a lack of maintenance at a senior center.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Neal adjourned the
Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. on June 12, 2001.
NO ATTACHMENT FOR ITEMS 2A, 2B AND 2C
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 11,2001
SUBJECT: Health Department Roof Repairs (Project No. 5116)
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a
construction contract with Haeber Roofing for a total fee not to exceed $141,214 for the
Health Department Roof Repairs (Bond Issue Project Al).
ISSUE: This project was approved November 7, 2000 in the Bond Issue 2000 Package
under Proposition No. 3 Public Health and Safety Improvements. A consultant contract
has been executed with Roots Foster Associates Architects to complete the design phase,
bid phase, and construction phase. A construction contract is required to complete the
construction phase; and requires City Council approval.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2000-2001 Public Health and
Safety Capital Improvement Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
Nina M. Sisley, M.D., ~I.15.H.,
Director of Public Health
'Angel R. Escobar, P. E.,
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Suooort Material:
Exhibit"A" Background Information
Exhibit"B" Project Budget
Exhibit"C" Location Map
Exhibit"D" Bid Tab Summary
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Health Department Roof Repairs (Bond Issue Project Al)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Aua_ust 22. 2000 - Ordinance approving FY 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Budget
(Ordinance No. 024162).
2. November 14, 2000 - Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the
Special Election held on November 7, 2000, in the City of Corpus Christi for the
adoption of seven propositions; adopting and levying a sales and use tax pursuant
to Section 4A of The Development Corporation Act as approved by the voters in
Propositions 4 and 5/Ordinance No. 024269).
3. Janua~ 30.2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
an engineering services contract in the amount of $122,014 with Roots Foster
Associates Architects for the following projects:
· ADA and COED Improvements at Fire Stations (Bond Issue Project A'I);
· Health Department Roof Repairs (Bond Issue Project Al); and
· Convention Center/Auditorium Roof Repairs (Non-Bond Issue Project)
(Motion No. M2001-032).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. October 18. 2000 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000-08 -
(Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to
73 local architectural and engineering firms.
2. November 10, 2000 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement
Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms.
3. January 10, 2001 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement
Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Council will be presented with a change order to address
interior water damage due to favorable bids.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, November 7, 2000, the City of Corpus Christi
held an election to consider a number of ballot propositions to fund major capital
improvements for the community, Bond Issue 2000. The November 7, 2000 election was
held jointly with Nueces County and coincided with the Presidential Election.
H/HOME\VELMAR\GEN/HEALTH/5116~AG EN DA BKG
EXHIBIT "A"
Page I of 3
The Bond Issue 2000 package includes $30.8 million in projects to be funded from ad
valorem property taxes (a General Obligation Bond Issue) in Public Health and Safety,
Parks and Recreation/Museum, and Street improvement projects. The proposed projects
target the City's most immediate needs to improve existing physical facilities, provide for
growth, and protect the City's investment in its infrastructure.
Proposition No. 3 Public Health and Safety Improvements included roof repair of City's
Health Department. The Health Department is located at 1702 Home Road; and it was
built in 1977. An inspection of the roof revealed severe damage to the roof membrane
beneath the equipment area at the second level as well as damage to the main expansion
joint cover. The building has a number of roof leaks which have resulted in buckled ceiling
tiles and wet floors. Replacement of the roof will provide an effective measure in
maintaining the Health Department facility and promote a safer and more comfortable
environment for clients and staff.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The work includes removing the existing built-up roof and
installing a new 20-year built-up roof on the existing approximately 37,000 square feet
insulating concrete deck of the Health Building. Included, but not necessarily limited to the
job, are:
replace parapet caps with pre-finished metal caps;
install modified bitumen cap sheet over existing 12-foot wide stucco parapet wall
top;
remove/dispose of existing gas line supports and install new stainless steel proper
roller type assemblies;
replace all gravity vents or flues;
re-install fume hood exhaust units on wood runner bases direct to roof top; no pitch
pans;
salvage and re-install existing wide metal cap at curved stairwell parapets; install
cap sheet over same;
cut out metal counterflash at certain locations and install new reglet type
countedlash, surface mounted and sealed (where existing cannot be bent up);
cap existing pitch pan eyebolt locations retrievable for any future possible rooftop
antenna installation suppor~ need;
replace existing building expansion joint cover;
patch existing insulating concrete fill;
include asbestos abatement in demolition/removal; and
paint metal caps at pilasters and install new sealant.
BID INFORMATION: The City received proposals on June 6, 2001 from three (3) bidders.
The project consists of a Base Bid; and the bids range from $141,214 to $187,405.
Haeber Roofing of Corpus Christi, Texas is the Iow bidder on the total of the Base Bid in
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 3
the amount of $141,214. They have satisfactorily completed other roofing projects for the
City. The City's consultant, Roots Foster Associates Architects, and City staff recommend
contract award of the Base Bid in the amount of $141,214 to Haeber Roofing.
CONTRACT TERMS: The contract specifies that the project will be completed in 125
calendar days, with completion anticipated by the end of November, 2001.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2000-2001 Public Health and
Safety Capital Improvement Budget.
H:\HOM E\VELMAR/GEN\HEALTH/5116\AGENDA BKG
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 3 of 3
PROJECT BUDGET
HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAJOR ROOF REPAIRS (Project No. 5116)
June 11, 2001
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
Health Department Major Roof Repairs .................................................................. $207,834.00
FUNDS REQUIRED:
Construction (Haeber Roofing) .............................................................................. $141,214.00
Contingencies (10%) .......................................................................................... 14,120.00
Consultant (Roots Foster Associates Architects) ...................................................... 19,834.00
Bond Issuance Expense (1%) .............................................................................. 3,000.00
Administrative Reimbursements (1%) .................................................................. 3,000.00
Art in Public Places (1.25%) ............................................................................... 3,750.00
Engineering Reimbursements ............................................................................. 7,500.00
Asbestos Abatement ......................................................................................... 11,916.00
Incidental Expenses (Printing, Advertising, etc.) ...................................................... 3,500.00
Total ............................................................................................................... $207,834.00
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 1 of 1
File : \Mproject\councilexhibi~s\exh5116.dwg
~-~ PROJECT LOCATION
VICINITY ~AP
CITY PROJECT NO. 5116 NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT "C"
CZTY COUNCIL EXHZBZT ~
HEAL TH DEPARTMENT ROOF REPAZRS or¢,~r~r o¢ ~ s~wcrs
PAGE: 1 of 1
CI~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DATE: 05-~1-2001 ~
TABULATION OF BIDS Page 1 of 1
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
TABULATED BY: Angel R.Escobar, P.B., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: Wednesday, June 6, 2001 TIME OF COMPLETION: 125 Calendar Days
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $225,000
Haeber Roofing Company
Baldwin Roofing Co.Inc.
Port Enterprises Ltd
Health Department
Major Roof Repairs
2833 Holly Road
P.O. Box 9380
P.O.Box 271482
Project No. 5116
Corpus Christi, TX 78415
Corpus Christi, TX 78469
Corpus Christi, TX 78927
DESCRIPTION
QTY.
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICK
AMOUNT
I tem
Removal of the existing
1
is
141,'_14.00
$141,214.00
170,000.00
$170,000.00
187,405.00
$187,405.00
i
0.00
Nc,.l
built-up t.,of s install .
new 20 -year built up roof
on the existing
approximatley 37,000 s.t.
Health Building in place
ready for use, for a lump
sum
TOTAL SAS$BID:
$141,214.00
$170,000.00
$187,405.00
0.00
4
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 8, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance abandoning and vacating 1,173-square feet, of a 10-foot wide,
utility easement out of Lot 9, Arbor Terrace Subdivision; requiring the owner, Mr. Gregg
Kupec, (Owner), to comply with the specified conditions and replat the property within 180
days at owner's expense; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: Mr. Gregg Kupec is requesting the easement closure to rectify an encroachment
on the existing 10-foot utility easement by an existing building.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: City Charter requires Council approval to abandon and
vacate any portion of an easement.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: Owner must replat the property within 180 days at its
expense.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented on an
emergency basis.
'¢(/nCef R. f~scobar, P.E. /"
Director of Engineering Services
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Site Location Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PURPOSE OF CLOSUREAND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Gregg A. Kupec is requesting the abandonment and vacation of a 1,173-square foot,
10-foot wide utility easement out of Lot 9, Arbor Terrace Subdivision. The utility easement
abandonment is necessary because a building encroaches 4-feet into the easement.
All public and franchised utilities were contacted. The Code and Zoning Department
expressed concern regarding the encroachment because the building in question has been
constructed outside the existing 50-foot building line shown on the plat, and it is within the
required 10-foot side yard off of Roscher Road. A variance would have to be granted by
the Zoning Board of Adjustment. On May 23, 2001, Mr. Kupec appeared before the Zoning
Board of Adjustment (case # 3213) and was granted a variance allowing the building to be
placed in the 10- foot side yard. There were no objections regarding the proposed
easement abandonment. There are no existing utilities within the easement being closed.
Staff recommends payment of the fair market value of ~340.00 for the abandonment and
vacation of the total 1,173-square foot utility easement. The owner has been advised of
and concurs with the conditions of the easement abandonment and vacation.
~ Mproject \ speciolservlces \ roscher2, dwg
LOT 9
ARBOR TERRACE
VOL 5§, PG. ~5--34
MAP RECORDS NUECES COUNlh' ~XAS
T= 2.¢g'
EASEMENT TO
CLOSED
AREA OF CLOSURE--II73 SQ.FT. (0.0269 AC.)
SITE MAP
(EASEMENT CLOSURE) EXHZB.~T "A" ,'~
LOT 9 ARBOR TERRACE OE~ART. E~T Or E~~,~EER,~C SE~CES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS DATE: 6/12/01
AN ORDINANCE
ABANDONING AND VACATING A 1,173 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF
A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT OUT OF LOT 9, ARBOR
TERRACE SUBDIVISION; REQUIRING THE OWNER, MR. GREG
KUPEC, TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFIED CONDITIONS AND
REPLAT THE PROPERTY WITHIN 180 DAYS AT OWNER'S EXPENSE;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, there is a 1,173 square foot portion of a 10 foot wide utility easement out of Lot 9,
Arbor Terrace Subdivision as recorded in Volume 55, Pages 33-34, Map Records Nueces
County., Texas, that the owner. Mr. Greg Kupec (Owner), xvishes to have abandoned and
vacated; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus
Christi to abandon and vacate said portion of the utility easement lbr all purposes, subject to the
provisions below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. That the 1,173 square foot portion of a 10 foot wide utility easement out of Lot 9,
Arbor Terrace Subdivision as recorded in Volume 55, Pages 33-34, Map Records Nueces
County, Texas is abandoned and vacated for public use as a utility easement, subject to Owner's
compliance with the following specified conditions as part of the abandonment and vacation:
Payment of the fair market value is set at $340.00 for the total 1,173 square foot portion
of utility easement right-or:way to be abandoned and vacated.
Zoning Board of Adjustment granted Owner a variance on May 23, 2001, (case # 3213),
allowing the building to be placed in the 10-foot side yard.
The Owner must replat the portions of Arbor Yerrace Subdivision being abandoned and
vacated within 180 days at O~vner's expense; provided however, the City Engineer may
extend the time limit for an additional 180 days if extenuating circumstances outside the
Owner's control necessitate an extension.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five council members, copy attached,
the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action
necessary, for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the
Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so
that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the
194 day of June, 2001.
'\CITYHALL02\USERS\LEG-DIR\SHINDA\JOSEPH'.ORD-ArborT.doc
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 8, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance abandoning and vacating 1,173-square feet, of a 10-foot wide,
utility easement out of Lot 9, Arbor Terrace Subdivision; requiring the owner, Mr. Gregg
Kupec, (Owner), to comply with the specified conditions and replat the property within 180
days at owner's expense; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: Mr. Gregg Kupec is requesting the easement closure to rectify an encroachment
on the existing 10-foot utility easement by an existing building.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: City Charter requires Councii approval to abandon and
,/agate any portion of an easement.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: Owner must replat the property within 180 days at its
expense.
RECOMMENDATION:
emergency basis.
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented on an
v)(~n~el R. EscoDar. P.E. /
Director of E~cmeering Se~ices
Attachments:
Exhibit A- Site Location Mac
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PURPOSE OF CLOSUREAND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Gregg A. Kupec is requesting the abandonment and vacation of a 1,173-square foot,
1 O-foot wide utility easement out of Lot 9, Arbor Terrace Subdivision. The utility easement
abandonment is necessary because a building encroaches 4-feet into the easement.
All public and franchised utilities were contacted. The Code and Zoning Department
expressed concern regarding the encroachment because the building in question has been
constructed outside the existing 50-foot building line shown on the plat, and it is within the
required 10-foot side yard off of Roscher Road. A variance would have to be granted by
the Zoning Board of Adjustment. On May 23, 2001, Mr. Kupec appeared before the Zoning
Board of Adjustment (case # 3213) and was granted a variance allowing the building to be
placed in the 10- foot side yard. There were no objections regarding the proposed
easement abandonment. There are no existing utilities within the easement being closed.
Staff recommends payment of the fair market value of $340.00 for the abandonment and
vacation of the tota~ 1,173-square foot utility easement. The owner has been advised of
and concurs with the conditions of the easement abandonment and vacation.
\ MOro~eot \ speciolseryices \ roscher2, clwcj
LOT 9
ARBOR 'PER RAC £
VOL 55, PG. ,33-34
MAP R[CORDS NUECI~ COUNTY
~,.= 27'59'4.67
$47'35'26'E/
F_~SE~ENT TO BE
CLOSED
LOT
.U~EA OF CLOSURE-II73 SQ.FT. (0.0269 AC.:
SITE MAP
NOT TO $C4LE
(EASEMENT CLOSURE.) !I, EXHIBIT " A "
9ARBOR TERRACE [ OE~ART~E~T o~ E~~,~E~R,~c
CITY
OF
AN ORDINANCE
)~BANDONING AND VACATING A 1,173 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF
A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT OUT OF LOT 9, ARBOR
TERRACE SUBDIVISION: REQUIRING THE OWNER, MR. GREG
KUPEC, TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFIED CONDITIONS AND
REPLAT THE PROPERTY WITHIN 180 DAYS AT O'~VNER'S EXPENSE;
.~ND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, there is a 1A73 square foot portion of a 10 foot wide utility easement out of Lot 9,
M'bor Terrace Subdivision as recorded in Volume 55. Pages 33-34, Map Records Nueces
County., Texas. that the owner. Mr. Greg Kupec (Owner), wishes to have abandoned and
vacated: and
WHEREAS. it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City. of Corpus
Christi to abandon and vacate said portion of the utili~' easement for ail purposes, subject to the
provisions below.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COL~NCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. That the 1.173 square foot portion ora 10 foot wide utility, easement out of Lot 9.
Arbor Terrace Subdivision as recorded in Volume 55, Pages 33-34, Map Records Nueces
County., Texas is abandoned and vacated for public use as a utiliw easement, subject to Owner's
compliance xvith the following specified conditions as part of the abandonment and vacation:
Payment of the fair market value is set at $340.00 for the total 1.173 square foot portion
of utility easement right-of-way to be abandoned and vacated.
Zoning Board of Adjustment granted Owner a variance on *lay 23. 2001. {case # 3213),
alloxving the buiiding to be placeci in the 10-lbo{ side yard.
The Owner must replat the l~ortions of Arbor Terrace Subdivision being abandoned and
':acated within 180 days at Owner's expense: provided however, the City Engineer may
extend the time limit for an additional 180 days if extenuating circumstances outside the
Owner's control necessitate an extension.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five council members, copy attached,
the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need tbr immediate action
necessary, tbr the efficient and effective administration of Cit3' affairs and (2) suspends the
Charter nile that requires consideration or' and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so
that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the
!9th day of June. 200l.
CITYHALL02' USERS',L EG-DIR\,SHINDAxJC':EPH' ORD-ArborT doc
5
-7
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: June 12, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant
application in the amount of $25,000 to the State of Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts for
tobacco compliance and prevention activities.
ISSUE: The State has funding available to encourage compliance and enforce regulations
governing the sale, distribution, and use of cigarettes and tobacco products as mandated by
Senate Bill 55. This block grant is available to help defray some of the costs associated with
enforcement of tobacco regulations.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Police Officers on an overtime basis will conduct the
following activities:
· On-site compliance inspections of tobacco permitted retail outlets that may result in
the issuance of citations using minors as decoys ("stings").
· On-site compliance inspections that may result in the issuance of citation not using
minors as decoys (violations for signs not posted, lack of proper certifications, etc.)
· Compliance education for retailers or school age children
· Monthly compliance activity reports to Comptroller or Comptroller's designee.
Funding up to $25,000 is available for the grant period 09/01/01 - 08/31/02. The previous two
years the City has applied for $25,000 and has been awarded $I0,000 each year. Funds are
designated for overtime enfomement to conduct the activities above focusing on the estimated
434-cigarette/tobacco retailers in the City. In the past 12 months we have conducted over 137
inspections and issued over 100 citations.
FUNDING: There is no match required by the City.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Permission to submit the grant.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends submitting the application.
Tobacco Compliance Grant Application
September 1, 2001 - August 31, 2002
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
The City of Corpus Christi is requesting financial assistance in the amount of $25,000 in
block grant funds to enable focused educational/enforcement efforts directly associated
with compliance/enforcement of tobacco regulations.
1. Department or Division responsible for compliance program:
Corpus Christi Police Department
Special Services Division (Enforcement/Education)
Vice Section & J.E.T. (Juvenile Enforcement Team)
Contact Person: Brian T. Uhler, Commander, Special Services Division
(361) 886-2706
2. Whatistheapproximatepopulationwithinyourjurisdiction:
Corpus Christi is located in Nueces County and home to approximately 300,000
residents. However, the population frequently fluctuates during certain times when
special events are held such as Bayfest, Sea Sculptures, Buccaneer Days, U.S.
Powerboat Racing Championships, Beach to Bay runs etc. During these types of
events our population may increase to 400-500,000.
3. What is the approximate number of tobacco retailers within your jurisdiction:
As per Comptroller of Public Accounts report of permit year 1998, there are 434
Cigarette/tobacco retailer permits issued within the City of Corpus Christi. In
addition, tobacco products are sold/provided at any number of other outlets. The
Special Services division, vice section continues to receive complaints from the
citizenry of the unlawful sale of tobacco products to minors, and "bootlegging" of
cigarettes by both adults and minors.
The Corpus Christi Police Department is one of the lowest staffed departments for
.cities of comparable size in Texas. The ratio of police officers per one thousand
residents is low, especially considering that the Department is highly civilianized.
Due to the lack of personnel very limited attention has been, or can be dedicated to
enforcement/education efforts involving recent legislation regulating tobacco sales,
possession, and/or use. The Vice section is staffed with one (1) Lieutenant, and five
(5) investigators. A prioritization system of handling citizen complaints/investigations
is used, and unfortunately the number of complaints/investigations results in many
complaints receiving a relatively low priority.
4. List and detail enforcement actions you plan to take:
1. Operational:
The Special Services Division, Vice section will be tasked with conducting a 2-prong
enforcement plan of action. An effort toward education/enforcement will be directed
on an overtime basis. Vice undercover investigators and enforcement investigators
will conduct surveillance on retail and other outlets of tobacco products with a focus
toward interdicting unlawful sale of tobacco products to minors. In the last grant
application, we mentioned warning first offenders. Through the previous two grants
we have conducted enough compliance inspections that, with very few exceptions,
warnings are not part of our program. We will continue to distribute informational
material to the retailers that will help inform them of what they are required to know.
For those retail outlets found to be in violation, follow-up visits/inspections will be
conducted to verify compliance.
The second prong will be "Minor Stings"~ Vice investigators have developed a list of
minors willing to participate in posing as minor decoys. Vice investigators will be
the undemover/cover officers ensuring the integrity of the operation and ensuring the
safety of our minor. Each minor that we use, and their parents when necessary, fill
out the requisite permission forms. Each minor that we use must have a valid Texas
photo driver's license or identification card. If the clerk asks for identification, the
minor is mandated to tell the clerk his/her true age, and must produce a valid D.L. or
identification card on demand. In line with the sting operations, Vice will coordinate
street level enforcement sessions. Investigators, in uniform, patrol areas of schools,
before and after school is in session, and, using unmarked enforcement vehicles,
investigators/officers cite those individuals in possession of tobacco products and/or
consuming tobacco products. This effort has been one of the most effective efforts for
youth education/awareness and incentive to stop smoking.
List and Detail prevention and compliance education actions you plan to take in
support of Senate Bill 55, 75a Legislature:
The Corpus Christi Police Department plans to continue including in the DARE
program the message of the hazards associated with tobacco use and discouraging its
use and abuse. The Vice section intends on increasing the number of
instructional/awareness sessions by attending community events, Health Fairs,
Neighbors On Watch, PTA & PTSA meetings and more.
'We need additional funds to purchase incentive type awards for youth (koozies,
pencils, coloring books etc) that have some type of avoidance/awareness message.
Koch Refinery and Whataburger will be donating some material but more is needed.
We plan on continuing retail outlet education through both the compliance inspection
process and working with corporate managers.
Explain your community's overall plan for preventing youth access to tobacco
products:
Local community organizations such as the Intergovernmental Commission on Drug
and Alcohol Abuse, Commission on Children and Youth, Youth Opportunities
United, The Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, and other volunteer
organizations continue to spread the word of the dangers of tobacco to youth in our
community. Their efforts are ongoing and involve youth summits, a number of
educational opportunities in the schools, making funding available for the purchase of
educational literature, among many other efforts. Through all our joint efforts the
community has become quite aware of our focus on both Tobacco and Alcohol
use/abuse by minors. The funds requested would allow for a continuance of
momentum that has been established, and will help meet the community's
expectations of our enforcement and education efforts.
The plan is to continue as we have in availing ourselves to make appearances with the
community at each opportunity and to increase the frequency of our enforcement and
educational efforts.
Explain how strategies detailed in Questions $ and 6 will support your community's
overall plan for preventing youth access to tobacco product&
The strategies explained and detailed in questions 5 and 6 are exactly what is needed
to strengthen and enhance the community's efforts toward preventing youth access to
tobacco products. Without our street enforcement effort, our minor stings, compliance
inspections, and providing law enforcement presence at community functions there is
little to the "action" aspect of the community plan. By Tobacco STEP providing
funds needed, the community plan is strengthened and the consequences are
enhanced.
List any local community organizations or other agencies you will partner with to
implement all strategies detailed above:
Coastal Maverick Inc.
Commission on Children and Youth
Corpus Christi Business Alliance
Corpus Christi Independent School District
Intergovernmental Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Koch Refining Inc.
Northwest Business Association
SSP Corporation (Circle K Stores
St. Patricks Catholic School
St. Pius Catholic School
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission
The Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse
Tuloso-Midway Independent School District
West Oso Independent School District
Whataburger
Youth Opportunities United
Any other schools participating in the DARE program as tobacco awareness is part of
the DARE curriculum.
---~
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 12, 2001
SUBJECT: Master Advance Funding Agreement with Texas Department of
Transportation
AGENDAITEM:
Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to approve a Master Agreement
Governing Local Transportation Project Advance Funding Agreements with the Texas
Department of Transportation.
ISSUE: Approval of this Master Advance Funding Agreement is necessary to proceed with
future Texas Department of Transportation projects that are funded by federal highway and
state funds.
FUNDING: An outlay of funds is not required at this time.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
Angel R. Escobar, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit"A" Agenda Background Material
Exhibit"B" Advance Funding Agreement
Exhibit "C" FY 2002 - 2004 Draft TIP Project List
Page 1 of 1
H :~OME~/-YN DAS~GEN~STREETS'~ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT~MEMORANDUM DOC
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: er Advance F ~ding Agreement with Texas Department of
'. ~)ortation
PRIOR COUNCl; :.. TION: None
PRIORADMINISTR,~;iVE ACTION: None
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION:
Authorization to execute the local transportation project advance funding agreement for
specific local projects as listed on the TIP approved by the Metropolitan Planning
Organization.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Master Agreement Governing Local Transportation Project
Advance Funding Agreements is required for Texas Department of Transportation projects
using federal funds. The approval of the agreement will permit TxDOT to proceed with
metropolitan mobility projects inside the city limits.
H:IH OME~LYN DASIGE NISTR E ETS'~ADVA NC E FUNDING AGREEMENT~BACKGROUNO.DOC
EXHIBIT
Page 1 of
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE A
MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENTS WITH THE TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI CITY
COUNCIL:
SECTION 1. That the City Manager. or designee, is authorized to execute a Master
Agreement Governing Local Transportation Project Advance Funding Agreements with the Texas
Department of Transportation..4. copy of the Agreement is attached as an exhibit to this Resolution.
.ATTEST:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa, City Secretary.
Samuel L. Neal. Jr.. Mayor
Legal form approved ~
Lisa Aguilar 0
Assistant City Attorney
2001: James R. Bray, Jr.. City Attorney
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
MASTER AGREEMENT
GOVERNING
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENTS
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (MAFA) is made by and between the State of Texas, acting
by and through the Texas Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "State", and the _
City of Corpus Christi acting by and through its duly authorized officials, hereinafter called the
"Local Government."
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) codified under Title 23 U.S.C. Section
10 ! et seq., authorize transportation programs to meet the challenges of protecting and enhancing
communities and the natural environment and advancing the nation's economic growth and
competitiveness; and
WHEREAS, ISTEA and TEA-21 establish federally funded programs for transportation
improvements to implement its public purposes; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134 requires that Metropolitan Planning Organizations and
the States' Transportation Agencies to develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized
areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Code, Sections 201.103 and 222.052 establish that the
State shall design, construct and operate a system of highways in cooperation with local
governments; and
WHEREAS, federal and state laws require local governments to meet certain contract standards
relating to the management and administration of State and federal funds; and
WHEREAS, the governing terms of this Master Agreement will provide for efficient and
effective contract administration of the types of Local Project Advance Funding Agreements
(LPAFA) listed in Attachment A; and,
WHEREAS, the Texas Government Code, Section 441.189 allows any state record to be created
or stored electronically in accordance with standards and procedures adopted as administrative
rules of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission; and
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 1 of 17
WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Government has approved entering into this
Master Agreement by resolution or ordinance dated , attached hereto and
made a part of this Master Agreement as Attachment B.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants and
agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set
forth, it is agreed as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Period of the Agreements
This Master Agreement and the Local Project Advance Funding Agreements (LPAFAs)
subject to this Master Agreement become effective when signed by the last party whose
signing makes the respective agreements fully executed. This Master Agreement shall
remain in effect until terrmnated as provided in Article 2.
2. Termination of this Master Agreement
This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions:
a. by mutual written consent and agreement of all parties.
b. by any party with 90 days written notice. If this Master Agreement is terminated under
this clause, all existing, fully executed LPAFAs made under this Master Agreement shall
automatically incorporate all the provisions of this Master Agreement.
c. by either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill the obligations as set forth in
this Master Agreement.
3. Termination of the Local Project Advance Funding Agreement (LPAFA)
An LPAFA shall remain in effect until the project is completed and accepted by all parties,
unless:
a. the agreement is terminated in writing with the mutual consent of the parties, or;
b. because of a breach of this Master Agreement or a breach of the Local Project Advance
Funding Agreement. Any cost incurred due to a breach of contract shall be paid by the
breaching party.
c. After the PS&E the local government may elect not to provide the funding and the project
does not proceed because of insufficient funds; the local government agrees to reimburse
the State for its reasonable actual costs incurred during the project.
d. Conditions for termination as specified in the LPAFA are fulfilled.
4. Amendments
Amendment of this Master Agreement by Notice with Mutual Consent: The State
may notify the Local Government of changes in this Master Agreement resulting from
EXHIBIT "B"
2 Page 2 of '17
bo
Co
do
changes in federal or state laws or rules or regulations and these changes in the Master
Agreement shall be incorporated into this agreement unless the State is notified by the
Local Government within 60 days. From time to time, the State may issue numbered
restatements of this MAFA to wh~lly reflect its amendments.
This Master Agreement may be :.:nended due to changes in the agreement or the
responsibilities of the parties. Such amendment must be made through a mutually
agreed upon, written amendment that is executed by the parties.
The notice of amendment and the amendment to this Master Agreement may be in an
electronic form to the extent permitted by law and after a prior written consent of the
parties to this agreement is made.
Amendments to the LPAFAs due to changes in the character of the work or terms of
the agreement, or responsibilities of the parties relating to a specific project governed
under this Master Agreement may be enacted through a mutually agreed upon, written
amendment to the LPAFA.
5. Remedies
This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any agreement
default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party to this
agreement and shall be cumulative.
6. Utilities
If the required right of way encroaches upon existing utilities and the proposed project
requires their adjustment, removal or relocation, the Local Government will be responsible
for determining the scope of utility work and notify the appropriate utility company to
schedule adjustments, unless specified otherwise in a specific LPAFA under other provisions
of this MAFA.
The Local Government shall be responsible for the adjustment, removal or relocation of
utility facilities in accordance with applicable State laws, regulations, rules, policies and
procedures. This includes, but is not limited to: 43 TAC § 15.55 relating to Construction Cost
Participation; 43 TAC §21.21 relating to State Participation in Relocation, Adjustment,
and/or Removal of Utilities; and, 43 TAC§ 21.31 et seq. relating to Utility Accommodation.
The Local Government will be responsible for all costs associated with additional
adjustment, removal, or relocation during the construction of the project, unless this work is
provided by the owners of the utility facilities:
a. per agreement;
b. per all applicable statutes or roles, or:
c. as specified otherwise in a LPAFA.
Prior to letting a construction contract for a local project, a utility certification must be made
available to the State upon request stating that all utilities needing to be adjusted for
completion of the construction activity have been adjusted.
EXHIBIT "B
3 Page 3 of 17
7. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation
Development of a local transportation project must comply with the National Environmental
Policy Act and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which require environmental
clearance of federal-aid projects.
a. The Local Government is responsible for the identification and assessment of any
environmental problems associated with the development of a local project governed by
this agreement, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement.
b. The Local Government is responsible for the cost of any environmental problem's
mitigation and remediation, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project
agreement.
c. The Local Government is responsible for providing any public meetings or public
heatings required for development of the environmental assessment, unless provided for
otherwise in the specific project agreement.
d. The Local Government shall provide the State with written certification from appropriate
regulatory agency(ies) that identified environmental problems have been remediated,
unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement.
8. Compliance with Texas Accessibility Standards and ADA
All parties to this agreement shall ensure that the plans for and the construction of all projects
subject to this Master Agreement are in compliance with the Texas Accessibility Standards
(TAS) issued by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, under the Architectural
Barriers Act, Article 9102, Texas Civil Statutes. The TAS establishes minimum accessibility
requirements to be consistent with minimum accessibility requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act (P.L. 101-336) (ADA).
9. Architectural and Engineering Services
Any party to this contract may have responsibility for effecting the performance of
architectural and engineering services. Or, the parties may agree to be individually
responsible for portions of this work. The LPAFA shall define the party responsible for
performance of this work.
The engineering plans shall be developed in accordance with the applicable State's Standard
Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges, and the
special specifications and special provisions related thereto, unless specifically stated
otherwise in the LPAFA and approved by the State.
In procuring professional services, the parties to this agreement must comply with federal
requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 172 if the project is federally funded and with Texas
Government Code 2254, Subchapter A, in all cases.
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 4 of 17
Professional services contracts for federally funded projects must conform to federal
requirements, specifically including the provision for participation by disadvantaged business
enterprises (DBEs), ADA, and environmental matters.
10. Construction Responsibilities
a. Unless specifically provided for otherwise in the LPAFA, the State shall adve~ise for
construction bids, issue bid proposals, receives and tabulate the bids and award and
administer the contract for construction of the Project. Administration of the contract
includes the responsibility for construction engineering and for issuance of any change
orders, supplemental agreements, amendments, or additional work orders, which may
become necessary subsequent to the award of the construction contract. In order to ensure
federal funding eligibility, projects must be authorized by the State prior to advertising for
construction.
b. All contract letting and award procedures must be approved by the State prior to letting
and award of the construction contract, whether the construction contract is awarded by
the State or by the Local Government.
c. All contract change order review and approval procedures must be approved by the State
prior to start of construction.
d. Upon completion of the Project, the party constructing the project will issue and sign a
"Notification of Completion" acknowledging the Project's construction completion.
e. For federally funded contracts, the parties to this agreement will comply with federal
construction requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 635 and with requirements cited in 23
CFR Part 633, and shall include the latest version of Form "FHWA-1273" in the contract
bidding documents. If force account work will be performed, a finding of cost
effectiveness shall be made in compliance with 23 CFR 635, Part B.
11. Project Maintenance
The Local Government shall be responsible for maintenance of locally owned roads after
completion of the work and the State shall be responsible for maintenance of state highway
system after completion of the work if the work was on the state highway system, unless
otherwise provided for in the LPAFA or other prior existing maintenance agreement with the
Local Government.
12. Local Project Sources and Uses of Funds
a. The total estimated cost of the Project will be clearly stated in the local project
agreement. The expected cash contributions from the federal, state, Local Governments
or other parties will be clearly stated. The State will pay for only those project costs that
have been approved by the Texas Transportation Commassion.
b. A project cost estimate showing the estimated contributions in kind or in cash for each
major area of the local project will be provided in the LPAFA. This project cost estimate
will show how necessary resources for completing the project will be provided by major
cost categories. These categories include but are not limited to: (1) costs of real
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 5 of 17
property; (2) costs of utility work; (3) costs of environmental assessment and
remediation; (4) cost of preliminary engineering and design; (5) cost of construction and
construction management; and (6) any other local project costs.
c. The State will be responsible for securing the Federal and State share of the funding
required for the development and construction of the local project. Federal share of the
project will be reimbursed to the local government on a cost basis.
d. The Local Government will be responsible for all non-federal or non-State participation
costs associated with the Project, including any overruns in excess of the approved local
project budget, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA.
e. Following execution of the LPAFA, but prior to the performance of any review work by
the State, the Local Government will remit a check or warrant made payable to the
"Texas Department of Transportation" in the amount specified in the LPAFA. The Local
Government will pay at a minimum its funding share for the estimated cost of preliminary
engineering for the project, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA.
f. Sixty (60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids, the Local
Government shall remit its remaining financial share for the State's estimated
construction oversight and construction costs, unless otherwise provided for in the
LPAFA.
g. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the Local
Government at any time during the Project, the State will notify the Local Government in
writing. The Local Government will make payment to the State within thirty (30) days
from receipt of the State's written notification, unless otherwise provided for in the
LPAFA.
h. Upon completion of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the local project costs.
Any funds due to the Local Government, the State, or the Federal government will be
promptly paid by the owing party.
i. The State will not pay interest on any funds provided by the Local Government.
j. If a waiver has been granted, the State will not charge the Local Government for the
indirect costs the State incurs on the local project, unless this agreement is terminated at
the request of the Local Government prior to completion of the project.
k. If the local project has been approved for a "fixed price" or an "incremental payment"
non-standard funding or payment arrangement under 43 TAC §15.52, the LPAFA will
clearly state the amount of the fixed price or the incremental payment schedule.
1. The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts has determined that certain counties qualify as
Economically Disadvantaged Counties in comparison to other counties in the state as
below average per capita property value, and below average per capita income, and above
average unemployment, for certain years. The LPAFA will reflect adjustments to the
standard financing arrangement based on this designation.
m. The State will not execute the contract for the construction of a local project until the
required funding has been made available by the Local Government in accordance with
the LPAFA.
EXHIBIT "B"
6 Page 6 of 17
13.
Right of Way and Real Property
The Local Government is responsible for the provision and acquisition of any needed right
of way or real property, unless the State agrees to participate in the provision of right of
way under the procedures described herein as parts A and B of this provision.
Title to right of way and other related real property must be acceptable to the State before
funds may be expended for the improvement of the right of way or real property.
If the Local Government is the owner of any part of a project site under an LPAFA, the
Local Government shall perrmt the State or its authorized representative access to occupy
the site to perform all activities required to execute the work under the LPAFA.
All parties to this agreement will comply with and assume the costs for compliance with all
the requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title 42 U.S.C.A. Section 4601 et seq.,
including those provisions relating to incidental expenses incurred by the property owners
in conveying the real property to the Local Government, and benefits applicable to the
relocation of any displaced person as defined in 49 CFR Section 24.2(g). Documentation to
support such compliance must be maintained and made available to the State and its
representatives for review and inspection.
If the local govemment purchases right of way for a local government street, title will be
acquired in the name of the local government in accordance with applicable laws unless
specifically stated otherwise in the LPAFA and approved by the State.
If the State participates in the purchase of right of way for the state, it will be under the
processes established in the following paragraphs A or B, and the selected option shall be
specified in the LPAFA.
A. Purchase By the State for the State
The State will assume responsibility for acquisition of all necessary right of way for the
highway project. The Local Government will voluntarily contribute to the State funds
equal to ten (10) percent of the cost of the right of way for the proper development and
construction of the state highway system and shall transmit to the State a warrant or
check payable to the Texas Department of Transportation when notified by the State of
the estimated cost of the right of way. If the amount is found insufficient to pay the
Local Government's obligation, then the Local Government, upon request of the State,
will supplement this amount in such amount as requested by the State. Upon
completion of the highway project and in '~: event the total amount paid by the Local
Government is '.ore than ten (10) percent of the actual cost of the right of way, any
excess amount will be returned to the Local Government. Cost of the right of way by
the State shall mean the total value of compensation paid to owners, including but not
limited to utility owners, for their property interests either through negotiations or
eminent domain proceedings.
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 7 of 17
B. Purchase by the Local Government for the State
Purchase: Right of way purchases shall be a joint effort of the State and the Local
Government. Acquisition of right of way shall be in accordance with the terms of this
agreement and in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws governing the
acquisition policies for acquiring real property. The State agrees to reimburse the
Local Government for its share of the cost of such fight of way providing acquisition
when it has been authorized to proceed by the State.
Location Surveys and Preparation of Right of Way Data: The State, without cost
to the Local Government, will do the necessary preliminary engineering and title
investigation in order to supply to the Local Government the data and instruments
necessary to obtain acceptable title to the desired right of way.
Determination of Right of Way Values: The Local Government agrees to make a
determination of property values for each fight of way parcel by methods acceptable
to the Local Government and to submit to the State's District Office a tabulation of
the values so determined, signed by the appropriate Local Government representative.
Such tabulations shall list the parcel numbers, ownership, acreage and recommended
compensation. Compensation shall be shown in the component parts of land
acquired, itemization of improvements acquired, damages (if any), and the amounts
by which the total compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements.
This tabulation shall be accompanied by an explanation to support the determined
values, together with a copy of information or reports used in arriving at all
determined values. Such work will be performed by the Local Government at its
expense without cost participation by the State. The State will review the data
submitted and may base its reimbursement on the values which are determined by this
review. The State, however, reserves the right to perform at its own expense any
additional investigation deemed necessary, including supplemental appraisal work by
State employees or by employment of fee appraisers, all as may be necessary for
determination of values to constitute the basis for State reimbursement. If at any stage
of the project development it is determined by mutual-agreement between the State
and Local Government that the requirement for the Local Government to submit to
the State property value determinations for any part of the required right of way
should be waived, the Local Government will make appropriate written notice to the
State of such waiver, such notice to be acknowledged in writing by the State. In
instances of such waiver, the State by its due processes and at its own expense will
make a deterrmnation of values to constitute the basis for State reimbursement.
Negotiations: The State will notify the Local Government as soon as possible as to
the State's determination of value. Negotiation and settlement with the property owner
will be the responsibility of the Local Government without participation by the State;
however, the Local Government will notify the State immediately prior to closing the
transaction so that a current title investigation may be made to determine if there has
been any change in the tide. The Local Government will deliver properly executed
8
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 8 of 17
instruments of conveyance which together with any curative instruments found to be
necessary as a result of the State's title investigation will be properly vest title in the
State for each right of way parcel involved. The costs incidental to negotiation and the
costs of recording the right of way instruments will be the responsibility of the Local
Government. The cost of title investigation will be the responsibility of the State.
Condemnation: Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the
Local Government and will be the Local Government's responsibility at its own
expense except as hereinafter indicated. The Local Government will obtain from the
State without cost current title information and engineering data at the time
condemnation are to be indicated. Except as hereinafter set forth the Local
Government will concurrently file condemnation proceedings and a notice of lis
pendens for each case in the name of the State, and in each case so filed the judgment
of the court will decree title to the property condemned to the State. The Local
Government may, as set forth herein under "Excess Takings" and where it is
determined to be necessary, enter condemnation proceedings in its own name.
Property acquired in the Local Government's name for the State must comply with
requirements set forth in the engineering data and title investigation previously
furnished to the Local Government by the State at such time as the Local Government
conveys said property to the State. Court Costs, Costs of Special Commissioners'
Hearings and Appraisal Expense: Court costs and costs of Special Commissioners'
hearings assessed against the State or Local Government in condemnation
proceedings conducted on behalf of the State and fees incident thereto will be paid by
the Local Government. Such costs and fees, with the exception of recording fees, will
be eligible for ninety (90) percent State reimbursement under the established
reimbursement procedure provided such costs and fees are eligible for payment by the
State under existing law. Where the Local Government uses the State's appraisers
employed on a fee basis in Special Commissioners' hearings or subsequent appeals,
the cost of the appraiser for updating the report, for preparing new reports, preparing
for court testimony and appearing in court to testify in support of the appraisal will be
paid direct by the Local Government, but will be eligible for ninety (90) percent State
reimbursement under established procedure provided prior approval for such
appraiser has been obtained from the State. The fee paid the appraiser by the Local
Government shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in the appraiser's
contract for appraisal services with the State.
Excess Takings: In the event the Local Government desires to acquire land in excess
of that requested by the State for right of way purposes, the State's cost participation
will be lirmted to the property needed for its purposes. If the Local Government elects
to acquire the entire property, including the excess taking, by a single instrument of
conveyance or in one eminent domain proceeding, the property involved will be
acquired in the name of the Local Government and that portion requested by the State
for right of way will be separately conveyed to the State by the Local Government.
When acquired by negotiation, the State's participation will be based on the State's
approved value of that part of the property requested for right of way purposes,
9
EXHIBIT "B
Page 9 of 1~
provided that such approved value does not exceed actual payment made by the Local
Government. When acquired by condemnation, the State's participation will be in the
proportionate part of the final judgment amount computed on the basis of the
relationship of the State's approved value to the State's predeterrmned value for the
whole property.
Improvements: Property owners will be afforded an opportunity in the negotiations
to retain any or all of their improvements in the right of way taking. In anticipation of
the owner desiring to retain improvements, the State's approved value will include the
amounts by which the upper limit of State participation will be reduced for the
retention. It is further agreed that the upper limit for the State's participation in the
Local Government's cost for an improved parcel will be reduced as shown in the
State's approved value where the owner retains an improvement which is to be moved
by either the Local Government or the owner. In the event improvements, which are,
in whole or part, a part of the right of way taking are not retained by the owner; title is
to be secured in the name of the State.
The State will participate in the acquisition of a structure severed by the right of way
line if the part of the house, building or similar structure which lies outside the right
of way cannot be reconstructed adequately or there is nothing but salvage left,
provided that the State's value is established on this basis and provided that title to the
entire structure is taken in the name of the State. The State shall dispose of all
improvements acquired. The net revenue derived by the State from the disposition of
any improvements sold through the General Services Commission will be credited to
the cost of the right of way procured and shared with the Local Government.
Relocation of Utilities on Acquired State Right of Way: If the required right of
way encroaches upon an existing utility located on its own right of way and the
proposed highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of the
utility facility, the State will establish the necessity for the utility work. State
participation in the cost of making the necessary change, less any resulting increase in
the value to the utility and less any salvage value obtainable, may be obtained by
either the "actual cost" or "lump sum" procedures. Reimbursement under "actual cost"
will be made subsequent to the Local Government's certification that the work has
been completed and will be made in an amount equal to ninety (90) percent of the
eligible items of cost as paid to the utility owner. The "lump sum" procedure requires
that the State establishes the eligibility of the utility work and enters into a three-party
agreement, with the owners of the utility facilities and the Local Government, which
sets forth the exact lump sum amount of reimbursement, based on a prior appraisal.
The utility will be reimbursed by the Local Government after proper certification by
the utility that the work has been done, said reimbursement to be the basis of the prior
lump sum agreement. The State will reimburse the Local Government in an amount
equal to ninety (90) percent of the firm conm'Utment as paid to the utility owner. The
foregoing is subject to the provision that the individual lump sum approved value
shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In those cases
EXHIBIT "B"
10 Page 10 of 17
where a single operation is estimated to exceed $20,000 the transaction will be
brought to the attention of the State for determination of proper handling based upon
the cimumstances involved. Such utility firm commitment will be an appropriate item
of right of wa' The adjustment, removal or relocation of any utility line on publicly
owned right ~. way by sufferance or permit will not be eligible for State
reimburseme~::. The term "utility" under this agreement shall include publicly,
privately and cooperatively.owned utilities.
Fencing Requirements: The Local Government may either pay the property owner
for existing right of way fences based on the value such fences contribute to the part
taken and damages for an unfenced condition resulting from the right of way taking,
in which case the estimated value of such right of way fences and such damages will
be included in the recommended value and the approved value, or the Local
Government may do the fencing on the property owner's remaining property.
Where the Local Government performs right of way fencing as a part of the total fight
of way consideration, neither the value of existing right of way fences nor damages
for an unfenced condition will be included in the recommended value or the approved
value. State participation in the Local Government's cost of constructing right of way
fencing on the property owner's remainder may be based on either the actual cost of
the fencing or on a predetermined lump sum amount. The State will be given credit
for any salvaged fencing material and will not participate in any overhead costs of the
Local Government.
If State participation is to be requested on the lump sum basis, the State and the Local
Government will reach an agreement prior to the actual accomplishment of the work
as to the necessity, eligibility and a firm commitment as to the cost of the entire
fencing work to be performed. The foregoing is subject to the provision that the lump
sum approved cost shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the
State. In the event the cost of the fencing is estimated to exceed $20,000, the
transaction will be brought to the attention of the State for determination of proper
handling based upon the circumstances involved.
Reimbursement: The State will reimburse the Local Government for right of way
acquired after the date of this agreement in amount not to exceed ninety (90) percent
of the cost of the right of way acquired in accordance with the terms and provisions of
this agreement. The State's reimbursement will be in the amount of ninety (90)
percent of the State's predetermined value of each parcel, or the net cost thereof,
whichever is the lesser amount.
If condemnation is necessary and title is taken as set forth herein under the section
entitled "Condemnation," the participation by the State shall be based on the final
judgment, conditioned upon the State having been notified in writing prior to the
filing of such suit and upon prompt notice being given as to all action taken therein.
The State shall have the right to become a party to the suit at any time for all
11
EXHIBIT "B
Page 11 of 1
purposes, including the right of appeal at any stage of the proceedings. All other items
of cost shall be borne by the State and the Local Government as provided in other
sections of this agreement. If a lump sum fencing or utility adjustment agreement has
been executed, the State will reimburse the Local Government in the amount of ninety
(90) percent of the predetermined lump sum cost of the right of way fencing or utility
adjustment.
If the Local Government prefers not to execute a lump sum agreement for either
fencing or utility adjustments, the State will reimburse on the actual cost of such
fencing or adjustments. The Local Government's request for reimbursement will be
supported by a breakdown of the labor, materials and equipment used.
General: It is understood that the terms of this agreement shall apply to new right of
way authorized and requested by the State which is needed and not yet dedicated, in
use or previously acquired in the name of the State or Local Government for highway,
street or road purposes. This agreement shall also apply, with regard to any existing
right of way, to outstanding property interests not previously acquired and to eligible
utility adjustments not previously made, as authorized and requested by the State.
It is further understood that if unusual circumstances develop in the fight of way
acquisition which are not clearly covered by the terms of this agreement, such unusual
circumstances or problems will be resolved by mutual agreement between the State
and the Local Government.
14. Notices
All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be delivered
personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid or sent by electronic mail,
(electronic notice being permitted to the extent perrmtted by law but only after a separate
written consent of the parties), addressed to such party at the following addresses:
State:
Billy D. Parks, P.E.
Texas Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 9907
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9907
Local Government:
Angel Escobar, P.E.
City of Corpus Christi
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277
All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the mail, unless
otherwise provided herein. Either party may change the above address by sending written
notice of the change to the other party. Either party may request in writing that such notices
12
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 12 of 17
shall be delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail and such request shall be honored and
carried out by the other party.
15. Legal Construction
In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be
held invalid, illegal or unenfomeable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or
unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions and this agreement shall be construed
as if it did not contain the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision.
16. Responsibilities of the Parties
The State and the Local Government agree that neither party is an agent, servant, or
employee of the other party and each party agrees it is responsible for its individual acts and
deeds as well as the acts and deeds of its contractors, employees, representatives, and agents.
17. Ownership of Documents
Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the State shall
remain the property of the State. All data prepared under this agreement shall be made
available to the State without restriction or limitation on their further use. All documents
produced or approved or otherwise created by the Local Government shall be transmitted to
the State in the form of photocopy reproduction on a monthly basis as required by the State.
The originals shall remain the property of the Local Government.
18. Compliance with Laws
The parties shall comply with all Federal, State, and Local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules
and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any courts or administrative bodies or
tribunals in any manner affecting the performance of this agreement. When required, the
Local Government shall furnish the State with satisfactory proof of this compliance.
19. Sole Agreement
This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties and supersedes
any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the agreement's subject
matter.
20. Cost Principles
In order to be reimbursed with federal funds, the parties shall comply with the Cost
Principles established in OMB Circular A-87 that specify that all reimbursed costs are
allowable, reasonable and allocable to the Project.
13
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 13 of 17
21. Procurement and Property Management Standards
The parties shall adhere to the procurement standards established in Title 49 CFR {}18.36 and
with the property management standard established in Title 49 CF¢§ 18.32.
22. Inspection of Books and Records
The parties to the agreement shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records
and other documentation relating to costs incurred under this agreement and shall make such
materials available to the State, the Local Government, and, if federally funded, the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), and the U.S. Office of the Inspector General, or their
duly authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office during the contract
period and for four (4) years from the date of completion of work defined under this contract
or until any impending litigation, or claims are resolved. Additionally, the State, the Local
Government, and the FHWA and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to
all the governmental records that are directly applicable to this agreement for the purpose of
making audits, exarmnations, excerpts, and transcriptions.
23. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Audit Requirements
The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502,
ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in OMB Circular No.
A-128 through August 31, 2000 and stipulated in OMB Circular A-133 after August 31,
2000.
24. Civil Rights Compliance
The Local Government shall comply with the regulations of the Department of
Transportation as they relate to nondiscrimination (49 CFR Chapter 21 and 23 CFR
§710.40503)), and Executive Order 11246 titled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as
amended by Executive Order 11375 and supplemented in the Department of Labor
Regulations (41 CFR Part 60).
25. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Requirements
The parties shall comply with the Disadvantaged/Minority Business Enterprise Program
requirements established in 49 CFR Part 26.
26. Debarment Certifications
The parties are prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party that is debarred or
suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance
Programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension." The parties to this
contract shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order awarded under this
contract to certify its eligibility to receive Federal funds and, when requested by the State, to
14
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 14 of 17
furnish a copy of the certification in accordance with Title 49 CFR Part 29 (Debarment and
Suspension).
27. Lobbying Certification
In executing this Master Agreement, the signatories certify to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
a. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the
parties to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal
contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into
of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
b. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member
of Congress in connection with federal contracts, grants, loans, or cooperative
agreements, the signatory for the Local Government shall complete and submit the federal
Standard Form-I J J., "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions.
c. The parties shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for ail subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts
under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify
and disclose accordingly.
By executing an LPAFA under this Master Agreement, the parties reaffirm this lobbying
certification with respect to the individual projects and reaffirm this certification of the
material representation of facts upon which reliance will be made. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Title 31
U.S.C. §1352. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a
civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
28. Signatory Warranty
The signatories to this agreement warrant that each has the authority to enter into this
agreement on behalf of the party represented.
EXHIBIT "B
15 Page 15 of 1;
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in
duplicate counterparts.
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
By:
Name
Title:
Date:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executed for the Executive Director and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission for
the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies or work
programs heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission.
By:
Jennifer D. Soldano. Director
Contract Services Office
Date:
16
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 16 of 17
ATTACHMENT A
TYPES OF LPAFA FUNDING CATEGORIES UNDER THE MAFA
Federal Categories Prefix Federal Categories Prefix
Interstate Demonstration Projects
Interstate I Hi Priority Corridor on NHS DPR
Interstate Maintenance IM Rural Access Projects DPR
Interstate 4R Discretionary IDR Innovative Projects DPI
Interstate Constr. Discretioeary 1D Priority Intermodal Projects DPM
Consnsfion Comdor IVH/ITS
Bridges High Priority Projects HI'
Bridge Repair/Rehab On-System BP~BH
Other
National Highway System NH
Surface Transportation Program Forest Highways FH
Urban Mobility/Rehab STP-UM
Areas < 200,000 STATE CATEGORIES
Enhancement STP-TE
Metro Mobility/Rehab STP-MM Preventive Maintenance CPM
Urban Mobilit~/Rehab Farm-to-Market/Farm-to-Market Rebab A/AR
Urban & Rural Rehabilitation STP-R District Discretiona~T CD
Rural Mobility Rehab STP-RM State Funded Rehab C
Rail-Hwy Crossing Protective Devices STP-RXP Park Road C
Rail-Hwy Crossing Hazard Elimination STP-RXH State Funded Mobility C
Railroad Ip'ade Separations STP-RGS PASS/PASS Metro Match C
Safety-Hazard Elimination STP-HES Traffic Si~mls, si~mng & Pavement Markings C
Miscellaneous C
Congestion Mitigation & Air ~uality CM Railroad Replanking CRX
State Funded Landscape C/CL
Donor State Bonus* CLM
Any Area DB State Urban Street CUS
Areas >200,000 DBM
Areas <200,000 DBU Others per LPAFA exception
Minimum Guarantee MG Off-System Bridges Program BROX
*ISTEA Funding Categories - Not Re-established
in TEA 21
ATTACHMENT B
17
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 17 of 17
DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
and
Financial Plan for Projects with Obligation Authority
FY 2002 - FY 2004
Prepared by
Corpus Christi Metropolitan plarmmg Organization
in
cooperation with
City of Corpus Christi
City of Portland
San Patricio County
Nueces County
Texas Department of Transportation - Corpus Christi District
Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority
Port of Corpus Christi Authority
Public Meeting Dates:
Draft approved by the Transportation Policy Committee: December 21, 2000
Approved by the Transportation Policy Committee:
Amendments Approved by the Transportation Policy Comnnttee:
EXHIBIT "C"
PREFACE:
This Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is prepared in compliance with the Statewide Planning,
Metropolitan planning Rules jointly issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FI-IWA) (23 CFR
Part 450) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (49 CPK Part 613). This document lists the
transportation improvements planned to be carried out in the next three federal fiscal years. This TI~
covers three-year period from October 2002 through September 2004. The rules require the MPO, an
attainment area, to include all transportation projects which are:
Proposed for funding under title 23, U.S.C. (including Federal Lands Highway projects)
and the Federal Transit Act, excluding safety projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 402,
emergency relief projects (except those involving substantial functional, locational and
capacity changes), and planning and research activities (except those funded with NHS,
STP, and/or MA funds).
2. The projects that are consistent with the transportation plan, and
All regionally significant transportation projects for which FHWA or FTA approval is
required whether or not the projects are to be funded with title 23, U.S.C., or Federal
Transit Act funds. The examples of such projects are an addition of an interchange to
the Interstate System with state, local, and/or private funds, demonstration projects not
funded under title 23, U.S.C., or the Federal Transit Act, etc.
The MPOs in non-attainment areas are required to show, for information purposes, all regionally
significant projects to be funded with non-federal funds and air quality analysis. The Corpus Christi
Metropolitan Planning Organization does not have to comply with this requirement. However, to have
comprehensive and multimodal coverage, transportation projects related to the Corpus Christi
International Airport and The Port of Corpus Christi are included in the document, for information
purposes.
Not included in this documents are the Priority II Projects. These projects have tremendous public
support but are not ready to be let, therefore, they cannot be included in the TI1~. These are the projects
on which some work is being done: preliminary engineering, land acquisition, utilities adjustments, or
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS). These projects will be advancing to the TIP in a few years,
depending upon the progress on the pre-requisites to be let.
The document is organized into ten sections which are listed below.
I. Federally Funded Highway Projects
2. Federally Funded Transit Projects
3. State-Funded Highway Projects
4. Aviation Projects
5. Port Projects
6. Financial Plan
7. Annual Self-Certification
8. Area Map
9. Public Involvement Process
10. ADA Project Locations
12N TRODUL-I'ION:
The formal transportation planffmg activities in the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area began in 1961. In
that year, the Texas Highway Department, Planning Survey Division, the U.S. Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Public Roads, in cooperation with the City of Corpus Christi imtiated a transportation study.
This study shows the procedures and the results of the Origin and Destination Survey, the Central
Cordon Line Survey, and the Traffic Volume Survey. The study also shows travel characteristics such as
trip purpose, trip production, modes of travel, land use influence, and time patterns. This study also
includes the travel desired lines for all modes of vehicular and person movements in the Corpus Christi
In 1962, pursuant to the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962, the City of Corpus Christi and the Texas
Highway Department, in cooperation with the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Public
Roads, initiated a long-range comprehensive transportation plan. This effort resulted in the form of the
Corpus Christi Transportation Plan 1963-1964. The main objective of this study was to f'md an adequate,
long term solution for future traffic in relation to comprehensive urban development. The plan included
a complete network of streets and highways, which when completed, should provide smooth movement
of traffic. The City revised this plan in 1974, 1976, 1979, 1983-84, and 1987. In addition, the City
carried out several transportation studies to analyze special needs. Major studies included the Nueces
Bay Causeway Study - 1981, and the Extension of the Crosstown Expressway in 1982. In 1989, the City
studied the possibility of high speed water transportation in Nueces Bay connecting Corpus Christi and
Portland. This proposal, being costly, was not implemented. However, RTA provides a ferry boat link
between Corpus Christi, Shoreline Boulevard to USS Lexington and the Texas State AqUa-num. Few
studies have suggested, at least, another Laguna Madre crossing linking the National Seashores to the
Texas State AqUarium. The basic objective of such a crossing is to evacuate the people living east of the
Laguna Madre at the time of an emergency.
In 2000, in compliance w/th the Transportation Equity Act for 2P' Century (TEA-21), the MPO prepared
the FY 2000-2025 Metropolitan TransportaUon Plan (MTP). The plan addressed all transportation
modes and arrived at the prOject listing for transportation implementation for the twenty-year period.
This MTP is the basis for project selection for tiPs.
PURPOSE:
The Transportation Equity Act for the 2 IS~ Century (TEA-21) requires that the metropolitan
transportation planning process includes development of a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
The TIP is a short range transportation capital improvement plan. This document provides the guide
used by federal, state, and local governments to implement transportation projects within the
metropolitan planning area. It also identifies how the MPO will use federal, state, and local financial
resources to implement these prOJects. To be eligible for any level of federal funding, a project must be
in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the TIP. TEA-21 funding for the next three-year period of
the TIP is available under title 23, U.S.C., and the Federal Transit Act, excluding safety projects funded
under 23 U.S.C. 402. The TIP also includes ali regionally significant transportation projects for which
the FHWA or the FTA approval is required, whether or not the projects are to be funded with title 23,
U.S.C., or the Federal Transit Act funds.
DEFINITION OF AREA:
In 1973, the State Govemor designated the Corpus Christi as the Metropolitan Planning Organization to
perform transportation for the metropolitan area. The Corpus Christi Transportation Study was
originally comprising five signatories: the City of Corpus Christi, the City of Portland, the County of
Nueces, the County of San Paincio and the Texas Department of Transportation. To be fully multi-
modal, the MPO included the Regional Transportation Authority and the Port of Corpus Christi
Authority in the transportation planning process. The area map shows the physical boundary of the
Corpus Christi MPC area.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS:
Environmental Justice focuses on measures to prevent or correct disparities in benefits and cost.
President Clinton, on Februay 11, 1994 signed the Executive Order12898, "Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations." Complying with the E.O.
12898, the Department of Transportation (DOT) on April 15, 1997 issued Order 5680.2 to address
environmental justice in all programs, policies, and activities. The DOT Order specifically addresses
environmental justice for minorities (defined as Black, Hispanic, Asian American, American Indian or
Alaskan Native) and low-income population including whites (median household income below the
Department of Health and Human serWces poverty guidelines). Pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), all federally funded transportation planning and decisions must involve an
environmental justice assessment process that explicitly considers adverse effects or the potential of
adverse effects on these population segments. See Section 9 for public comments collected during the
public involvement process.
PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS:
The following resolution highlights the project selection process:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Ci.w of Corpus Christi is designated as the Metropolitan Planmng Organization
(MPC) for the Corpus Christi Urbanized Area, with the Corpus Christi Transportation Planning
Cormmittee serWng as the Policy Committee; and
WH~:REAS, the Corpus Christi Urbanized Area has a population greater than 200,000 and has,
therefore, been designated as a Transportation Management Area (TMA), in compliance with Section
3012 and 1024 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21 s, Century, which are subject to special
planning programming requirements regarding congestion management systems, project selection,
certification; and
Ve n ~:REAS, the Transportation Equity Act tbr the 2 I" Century (TEA-21) assigns prOject-level
programming responsibilities to MPOs for: (1) sub-allocated Surface Transportation Program (STP)
funds in TMA's, (2) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds in non-attmnment areas, and
(3) the Federal Transit Administration (F'FA) funds in TMAs; and
WH ~:REAS, the Surface Transportation Program Fund may be used for highway or transit
projects as well as for transportation related prOjects; up to 50 percent of National Highway System
funds may be transferred to the STP and used for any STP-eligible activity.; and Section 5307 transit
formula funds in excess of the operating assistance cap and what is needed for ADA (The Americans
with Disabilities Act) projects may be shifted to highway projects if approved by the MPO through the
metropolitan planning and programming process. ~
WI:t[~,EAS, the Federal Highway Administration, Surface Transportation Program
Apportiormaer: for the Corpus Christi Urbanized Area for Fiscal Year 2002 is $4.7 million.
WIt: REAS, the Iv[PO is cognizant of the value of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Developmem's Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community (EZ/EC) Program for the community
rev/talization, and agrees to assign priority to the E27EC Program projects applications submitted for this
metropolitan area, subject to approval of applications by the designated Federal agencies.
NOW, TItEREFORE, BE IT H~REBY RESOLVED:
In accordance with Section 134(h) (2) of Title 23 U.S.C., as amended, the Corpus Christi Transportation
Policy Committee, acting as the policy group for the above-named MPO, hereby approves the following
procedures pertaining to project selection during FY 2002 - FY 2004.
The approved Transportation Improvement Program shall be utilized for programming projects
within the metropolitan area.
Any projects listed in the first year of the approved Transportation Improvement Program shall
be considered in the ftrst priority, and may be implemented as soon as plans are completed and
funds are appropriated.
Should any project not be implemented from the first priority, then projects should be selected
from the second year which shall be considered the second priority, and, those projects may be
implemented as plans are completed and funds are appropriated.
This procedure was developed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation, C.C.
Regional Transportatmn Authority. and C.C. MPO. and is mutually agreeable, in accordance with
TEAo21.
Loyd Ncal Date
Mayor, City of Corpus Christi
Chairperson, Transportation Planning Committee
Billy D. Parks, P.E. Date
District Engineer, Corpus Claristi District
Texas Department o f Transportation
PROGRESS FROM PREVIOUS YEAR:
Federally Funded Street Projects:
Compiling information.
Federally Funded Transit Projects:
Compiling information.
AIR QUALITY ISSUES:
The Corpus Christi Metropolitan Area is an attainment area. The state monitors the air quality in
accordance with the State Implementation Program. Currently, the MPO does not have any
responsibilities regarding the air quality monitoring.
The MPO has been pamcipating in the Air Quality Committee activities. The Air Quality Committee
meets on a monthly basis, where several government agencies and local industries discuss and plan
activities and strategies to maintain air quality to comply with Federal and state regulaUons. The
committee organizes meetings, talks and presentations that help the stakeholders understand the new air
quality standards and the transition to the new standards. The committee coordinates the activities,
programs, and preventive measures that should be implemented during the ozone action days. The MPO
also participated in the Technical Working Group for Mobile Source Emissions.
.~MERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA):
The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) is in compliance with the American with Disabilities Act
(ADA). The City of Corpus Christi is in the process of constructing the handicap ramps to comply with
the American with Disabilities Act.
GLOSSARY
CSJ
PROJ ID
F. CLASS
FED PROG
PI-L~SE
Control Section Job Number - TxDOT assigned number for projects entered into the
Project Development Program (PDP)
Project Identification - Code assigned by the MPO for local tracking and identification.
Used to relate projects to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
Federal Functional Class - Federal classification of streets and highways into
functional operating characteristics. Categories are:
Interstate
Other Urban Freeways and Expressways
Other Principal Arterials
Minor Arterials
Urban Collectors and Rural Collectors
Rural Minor Collectors
Urban and Rural Local Streets and Roads
Federal Funding Category - Major categories of Federal funding as established by the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21~ Century (TEA-2I). Categories are:
IC
IM
NHS
STP
CMAQ
Bridge
DSB
FTA
APPN CAT 1 COST 1
APPN CAT 2 COST 2
APPN CAT 3 COST 3
APPN CAT 4 COST 4
LCL CONTRIB
LET Date
RVN Date
Interstate Construction
Interstate Maintenance
National Highway System
Surface Transportation Program
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds
On/Off System Bridge Rehabilitation
Donor State Bonus Funds
Minimum Allocation Funds
Federal Land Highway Program
Federal Transit Administration Funding
Different Funds Appomonment
Different Funds Apportionment
Different Funds Appomonment
Different Funds Apportionment
Contribution of the sponsoring agency
Bid Let Date
TxDOT's Revision Date
Project Phase for Federal Funding,
E Preliminary Engineering
R Right of Way Acquisition
C Construction
FEDERALLY FUNDED
HIGHWAY PROJECTS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002. ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED ltlGltXVAY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Name or Designation APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Project ID
District Location (From) APPN CAT 2 COST 2 State LET Date
County Loca~lon ('re) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN Date
City D~a~.ripfion of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Pha~e
Comments i Funding Cat~gory Total
0617-02-046 Park Road 22 (JFK Cansewa¥) Congressional $19,313.0 $29,600.0 S054C0194
Corpus Christi O'Coonell St. on Mainland 4C Reg+Special $13,687.0 $7,440.0 01/9
Nueces AqUarius St. on Padre Island Huh'icone Eva. S4000.0 $0.0
Corpus Clmsti Cons~uct 2-12' Lanas with 10' Wide $0.0 $8000.0 092001
Shoulders Multiple Fedcn-al Funds $45,000.0 C
0916-35-074 Bridge on Bea~ Ln. pass lleinsotm Rd. Bridge off System $300.0 $270.0 S155C0100
Corpus Christi STR I (B00155001) (~ Drainage Ditch to $0.0 $30.0 00/01
Nueces Approx. I Mi. W of SH 358 $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi R~place Bridge and Approaches $ 0.0 $0.0 092001
6B Bridge Off System $300.0 C
0916-35-983 Cam Produot~ Road Metro. Mobility $592.0 $473.6 S021C0197
Corpus Christi IH 37 $0.0 $0.0 02/06
Nueces Up River Road $0.0 $I 18.4 09/99
Corpus Chrisn Construct 4 Lane with CLTL $0.0 $0.0 092001
Moved from Priority 2 list 4C Metropolitan Mobility $ 592.0 C
0617-01-158 SH358 3CNHS $400.0 $320.0 S087C0999
Corpus Christi IH37/SH358 Interchange $0.0 $80.0 02/02
Nueces 0.3 Miles North of Bates Drive $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Sign Replacement $0.0 $0.0 092001
3C NHS Rehabilitation $~00.0 C
007~06-193 IH-37 Interstate Maint. $950.0 $760.0 S053C1299
Corpus Christi Waco Street $0.0 $0.0 02/03
Nueces UP/SP North of Cam Products Rd. $0.0 $190.0 09/99
Corpus Christi Overhead Sign Replacement $0.0 $0.0 092001
Category. 2 Interstate Maim. $950.0 C
1989-02-037 FM 624 aA Safety. 5286.0 $257.4 S037C0599
Corpus Christi 2.63 Miles West of FM 1889 $0.0 $28.6 02/05
Nueces 0.68 Miles West of FM 666 $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Safety Treat Drainage Structures 50.0 S0.0 09200 I
4A Safety $286.0 C
0326-03-087 SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) 3D NHS $1,800.0 $I,4~0.0 $089C1899
Corpus Christi IH 37 $0.0 $360.0 02/09
Nueces SH 358 (SPID) 50.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Install Freeway Management System $0.0 $0.0 092001
3D Traffic Management 51.800.0 C
Phase: C= Construction, E= Prelimina~ Engineering, ROW= Right of Way, T= Trans&r
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Name or Designation APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Project ID
District Lo~aflon (From) APPN CAT .~ COST 2 State LET Date
County Loation (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN Date
City [N~erlption of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Ph~
Cnmm~nf~ Fundin~ Category Total
0916-35-072 ADA Accessibility Metro. Mobility 5;1,100.0 $880.0 S125C0297
Corpus Christi : See Appendix 'A' for Locations $0.0 $0.0
Nueces N/A $0.0 5;220.0 11/99
Corpus Christi Construction of Handicap Ramps $0.0 $0.0 092001
Moved from FY 2001 4C Metropolitan Mobility $1,100.0 C
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Chnsu
Corpus Christi
queces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary Engineenng. ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 200~ ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Name or Designation APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Projec~ ID
District Location (From) APPN CAT 2 COST 2 State LET Date
County Location (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN Date
City. Description of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Phase
Comments Fundin~ Cate~or~ Total
0326-03-084 SH 286 Bridge on System $125.0 $100.0 S089C1999
Corpus Christi 0.131 Mile Nor'th of Cuibertson off Ramp $0.0 $25.0 03/01
Nueces 0.131 Mile South of Culbcmon offRamp $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Rehabilitale Bridge and Approaches $0.0 $0.0 092001
6A Bridge On System $125.0 C
0916-00-045 Various LocaUous QTS $340.0 $170.0 S916C0100
Corpus Clu'isti LoCa~ons in Corpus Christi $0.0 $170.0 03/01
Nunces $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Integrate Existing CommuniCations Ne~ork $0.0 $0.0 09200
15 Fed Demo Projec~ $340.0
0916-00-046 Various Locations QT8 $2,359.2 $1,179.6 S916C0200
Corpus Christi Locations in Corpus Christi $0.0 $1,179.6 03/08
Nueces $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Traffic Operanuns Center to Emer. $0.0 $0.0 092001
15 Fed Demo Projec~ $2,359.2 C
0916-00-047 Various Locations QT8 $1,084.6 $542.3 $916C0300
Corpus Christi Locations in Corpus Chri~ $0.0 $542.3 03/06
Nueces $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Integrate Existing Communications Network $0.0 $0.0 092001
15 Fed Demo Projecm $1,084.6 C
0916-35-968 County Road Bridge off System $155.0 $134.9 S968C0100
Corpus Christi STR (AA0338002) CR 30 (~ West Oso Creek $0.0 $20.1 03/01
Nunces Approx. 1.1 Mile East of CR 339 $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Replace Bridge & Approaches $ 0.0 $0.0 092001
6B Bridge Off System $155.0 C
0617-01-149 SH 358 (SPID) 3DNH$ $1,500.0 $1,200.0 S087CI099
Corpus Christi Airline Road $0.0 5;300.0 02/09
~/ueces Greenwood Drive $0.0 $0.0 09/97
Corpus Christi Install Surveillance System for D & V $0.0 $0.0 09200 l
Under consideration for 1998. 3D Traffic Management $1,500.0 C
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Comus Chnsti
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary EnginCenng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2004 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Nameor Designation APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Project ID
District Locntton (From) APPN CAT 2 COST 2 State LET Date
County Location (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN Date
City Description of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Phase
Comments Fundin~ Catego~ Total
0074-06-197 IH 37 Interstate Maint. $1,322.9 $1,190.6 S053C1900
Corpus Clwisti Mesquite Street $0.0 $132.3 03/11
Nueces SH 358 (SPID) S0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Overlay (Novachip) S0.0 $0.0 092001
Category 2 Intemate Maim. $1¢322.9 C
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Nueces County
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Chrisn
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary Engineer/ng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
FEDERALLY FUNDED
TRANSIT PROJECTS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Project Name Project Funding Federal Comments
County Project Description Number Source State
City Local
Total
Project Sponsor
Corpus Christi Vehicle Expansion [erA 5307 S547.8
Nueces New Equipment 2-35' Buses $0.0
Corpus Christi $112.2
RTA $660.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $3,560.7
Nueces New Equipment 13-35' Buses $0.0
Corpus Christi S729.3
RTA $4,290.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 S23.2
Nueces New Equipment 2 Relief Vehicles $0.0
Corpus Christi $5.8
RTA $29.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $56.0
Nueces New Equipment 2 Service Vehicles $0.0
Corpus Christi S14.0
RTA $70.0
Corpus Christi Facilities FTA 5307 $40.0
Nueees New Construction - Expansion & $0.0
Corpus Christi Remodeling Paranansit Facility $ I0.0
RTA $50.0
Corpus Christi Facility Rehabilitation FTA 5307 $28.0
Nueces Roof Repair & Painting Paranansit Facility $0.0
Corpus Christi 57.0
RTA 535.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $60.0
Nueces New Computer Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $15.0
RTA S75.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $80.0
Nueces New Intelligent Transportanon System & SO.0
Corpus Christi Kiosks $20.0
RTA $I00.0
Phase: C= Construcnon, E= Preliminary Engineenng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Project Nme Project Funding Federal Comm~glts
County Project Description Number Source State
City Lin:al
Total
Proj~ Sponsor
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 580.0
Nueccs Replace Shop Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $20.0
RTA $100.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FFA 5307 $9.6
Nueces Fluid Storage Tank $0.0
Corpus Christi $2.4
RTA $12.0
Corpus Christi Equipment F~A 5307 $96.0
Nueces New Shop Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $24.0
RTA $120.0
Corpus Christi Furniture FTA 5307 $120.0
Nueees Replace Furniture $0.0
Corpus Christi $30.0
RTA $150.0
Corpus Christi Facilities FTA 5307 $280.0
Nueces New Construction - Bus Stop $0.0
Corpus Christi Improvements $70.0
RTA $350.0
Corpus Christi Preventive Maintenance FTA 5307 $1,768.0
Nueces Vehicte & Facility Preventive MainTenance $0.0
Corpus Christi $442.0
RTA $2,210.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $8.0
Nueces Replace Air Conditioners $0.0
Corpus Christi $2.0
RTA $10.0
Corpus Christi Facilities FTA 5309 $1,000.0
Nueces Renovate Bear Lane Facility $0.0
Corous Christi ~;O ~
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2003 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Projeet Nme Project Funding Federal Comments
County Project Description Number Source State
City Local
Total
l'rojeet spo~or
Corpus Christi Vehicle Expansion FTA 5307 S664.0
Nueces New Equipment 2-40' Buses $0.0
Corpus Christi 8136.0
RTA $800.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $2,324.0
Nueens New Equipment 7-40' Buses $0.0
Corpus Christi 5476.0
RTA $2,800.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $352.7
Nueces New Equipment 5 Parammsit Vans $0~0
Corpus Chrisu $72.2
RTA $425.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Repiaceraent FTA 5307 $1,328.0
Nuec~s New Equipment 4-40' Buses $0.0
Corpus Chrisn $272.0
RTA $1,600.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 5539.5
Nueces New Equipment 2 Trolleys $0.0
Corpus Christi $110.5
RTA $650.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $239.2
Nueces New Equipment 10 Sedans $0.0
Corpus Christi 559.8
RTA 5299.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement F°rA 5307 $22.4
Nueces New Equipment I Pickup Truck $0.0
Corpus Christi $5.6
RTA 528.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 523.2
Nueces New Equipment 2 Relief Vehicles $0.0
Corpus Christi $5.8
RTA $29.0
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary. Engineenng, ROW-- Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2003 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Projeet Name Project Funding ! Federal Comments
County Project Description Number Source State
City Local
Total
l'rol~*~ Sponsor
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $56.0
Nuece~ N~w Equipment 2 Service Vehicles $0.0
Corpus Clu'isti S14.0
RTA $70.0
Corpus Clu'isti Vehicle Repiac~r,~nt FTA 5307 $26.4
Nueces New Equipment Forklift $0.0
Corpus Christi $6.6
RTA $33.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 S~8.5
Nuecus New Computer Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $12.1
RTA $60.7
Corpus Cluisti Equipment FTA 5307 $24.0
Nueces New Intelligent Transportauon System & $0.0
Corpus Clu'isti Kiosks $6.0
RTA S30.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $45.2
Nueces Replace Shop and Building Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $11.3
RTA $56.6
Corpus Christi Faciiitius FTA 5307 $296.8
Nueces New Facilities - Bus Stop improvements & $0.0
Corpus Christi renovation $74.2
RTA S371.0
Corpus Christi Preventive Maintenance FTA 5307 $1,417.0
Nueces Vehicle & Facility Preventive Maintenance S0.0
Corpus Christi S35~..2
RTA $1,771.2
Corpus Christi Faci}ities FTA 5309 $ 1,200.0
Nueces Park & Ride Lot S0.0
Cor~us Christi $300.0
RTA $1.$00.0
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary, Engineenng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2003 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Project Name Project Funding Federal ~ Comments
County Project Description Number Source State
City. Loc~
Total
Project S]~onsor
Corpus C;~risti Facilities FTA 5309 $l,000.0
Nu¢¢es Renovate Bear Lane Facility $0.0
Corpus Christi $250.0
RTA Sl,250.0
rous Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary Engineering, ROW= Ri~rnt of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2004'ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Fonds in Thousands)
District Project Name Project Funding Fede~tl Comments
County Prolent Description Number Source State
City ~
To,ti
Project Sponsor
Corpus Christi Vehicle Expansion FTA 5307 S871.5
Nuece~ New F_xluipmeat 3 Trolleys $0.0
Corpus Christi $178.5
RTA $1,050.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle P,.eplacement FTA 5307 $2,324.0
Nueces New Equipment 7-35' Buses $0.0
Corpus Christi $476.0
RTA $2,800.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $141.1
Nueees New Equipment 2 Parawansit Vans $0.0
Corpus Christi 528.9
RTA $170.0
Corpus Christi Vehicle Replacement FTA 5307 $1,328.0
Nueces New Equipment 4-~0' Bus~s $0.0
Comus Christi $272.0
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2004 ELEMENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED TRANSIT PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Project Name Project Funding Federal Comments
County Project Description Number Source State
City Lo~ai
Total
l'ro]~ Spon~r
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $191.2
Nueces New Computer Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $47.8
PTA $239.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $24.0
Nueces New Ime[ligent Transportanon System & $0.0
Corpus Christi Kiosks $6.0
PTA $30.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $107.2
Nucces New Radio Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi 526.8
PTA $134.0
Corpus Christi Equipment FTA 5307 $104.3
Nueces Replace Shop and Building Equipment $0.0
Corpus Christi $26.0
RTA $130.4
Corpus Christi Furniture FTA 5307 $8.6
Nueces New Furniture for Facilities $0.0
Corpus Christi $2.1
RTA $10.8
' Corpus Christi Facilities FTA 5307 $340.8
Nueces New Equipment - Bus Stop Improvements $0.0
Corpus Christi Renovations $85.2
PTA $426.0
Corpus Chnsn Facilities FTA 5309 $1000.0
Nueces Renovate Bear Lane Faciliw $0.0
Corpus Christi $250.0
RTA $1,250.0
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Phase: C= Constmctio~, E= Preliminary Engineeinng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
STATE FUNDED
HIGHWAY PROJECTS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002~ ELEMENT
STATE FUNDED HIGltXVAY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Name or De~gmalton APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal ProjeO: ID
Di~rint Lo~aflon (From) APPN CAT 2 COST 2 State LET Date
County Loealion (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 LoeM RVN Date
CitT D~eriplion of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Ph~e
Commen~ Funding Cat~ory Total
336~--014)10 YM 3386 Farm to Marker $821.0 $0.0 $032C0294
Corpus Christi End FM 3386, Approx. 2.6 Mi. S of IH 37 $0.0 $821.0 02/08
Nueces Haven Drive $0.0 $0.0 09/99
Corpus Christi Improve FM Road $0.0 $0.0 09200 !
8B FM New Cons! $821.0 C
03734)1-037 US 77 SU'ategic Priority $9,500.0 $6,000.0 SI06C0299
Corpus Christi UP RR Overpass 4C On System $6,000.0 $9,500.0 02/04
Nueces FM 624 $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi ConsU'uct 4-Ln. Freeway with Frontage Rd. $0.0 S 15,500.0 092001
qew Addition 12 Strategic Priority C
1742--014)18 FM 169~. State Discretionary $542.0 $0.0 S013C0199
Corpus Christi IH 37 $0.0 $5,$2.0 01/11
Nueces CR 4~. $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Rehabilitate Roadway $0.0 $0.0 092001
New Addition 11 State DiscreUonary $542.0 C
09894)2-025 FM 624 Farm to Market $8,700.0 $0.0 S037C0194
Corpus Christi 2.63 Miles West of FM 1889 $0.0 $8,700.0 02/05
Nueces 0.68 Miles West of FM 666 $0.0 $0.0
Corpus Christi Add 2 lanes with Continuous Left Turn Ln. $0.0 $0.0 092001
New Addition 8B FM New Cons! $8,700.0 C
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary Engineenng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2003 ELEMENT
STATE FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ qsme or Dedgnafion APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Project lD
District Locltlon (From) APPN CAT 2 COST Z St~t~ LET Date
County Location fro) APPN CAT3 COST3 Local RVN Date
City D~a'lpflon of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Phase
Comments Funding Cate~or~ Total
Corpus Chri~
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Nueces
Cor~us Christi
Corpus Christi
San Patricio
Portland
Co~us Clu'isti
Nueces
Corpus Christi
Corp~ Clu-isti
Corpus Christ~
Corpus Christi
~orpu$ Clu-~sti
Corpus Christ~
C'or~us Christi
Phase: C~ Construction, E= Preliminary Engineerxng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2004 ELEMENT
STATE FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
(Funds i~ Thous~ds)
CSJ N~me orD(~ig~tioB APPN CAT 1 COST 1 i Federal Proj(~:tlD
District ~ou ~m) ~PN CAT 2 CO~ 2 S~ ~T
Coun~ L~flon ~o) ~PN CAT 3 CO~ 3 L~I R~
Cl~ ~pfloa of wo~ ~PN CAT 4 COST 4 L~ CO~
Comm~ Fundin~ Cat~o~ To~l
Co~
Nu~
Co~
Co~ Ch~sa
Nu~es
Co~ Chn~
Co~us C~sa
Nuec~s
Co~ ~s~
Co~ ~sti
Nueccs
Co~us Ch~sti
Phase: C-- Construction, E= Preliminary Engineenng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
AVIATION PROJECTS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002 ELEMENT
AVIATION PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
District Project Project Funding Federal Comments
County Number Source State
City Descrlplion of Work Local
Total
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.96006C FAA $801.0 Grunt/FAA
Nue~es Airfield Drainage Improvements-Phase 3, $0.0 PFC
Corpus Christi Midfield Drainage Area $89.0
$890.0
Corpus Christi ! Airport Project AV.96011B FAA $98.7 PFC
Nueces Landsidc Roadway System- Pinson Drive $0.0
Corpus Chrisli $10.9
$109.6
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.96011C FAA $33.7 PFC
Nueces Lundside Roadway System-North Access $0.0
Corpus Christi (Cliche) Road $3.7
$37.5
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.97002 FAA $72.0 PFC
Nueces Runway l 3-31 Extension Envirortmental $0.0
Corpus Christi Assessment $8.0
580.0
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.97001 FAA $189.0 Grant/FAA
Nueces Land Acquisition Environmental $0.0 Capital Revenue
Corpus Christi Assessment $21.0
5210.0
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEM~ENT PROGRAM
FY 2003 ELEME~F
AVIATION PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
Dl~rict Proje~ Pro.ie~ Fudlng Federal Comment~
County Number Sourte State
CRy Lo,al
De~ription of Work Total
{ Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.96002 FAA $1,618.5 i Grant/FAA
queees Land Acquisition S0.0 Land Acquisition Rescue
Corpus Christi $180.5
$1,799.0
Corpus Christi Airport proje~ AV.9601 lB FAA $1,361.7 PFC
Nueces Landside Roadway System (Pinson Drive) $0.0
Corpus Christ $151.2
$1,512.9
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.9601 lC FAA $437.4 PFC
Nueces Landside Roadway System-North Access $0.0
Corp~ Christi (Cliche) Road S48.5
$485.9
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.99001B FAA $1,192.5 Grant/FAA
Nueces Phase 4, SW/ATCT Drainage Area $0.0
Corpus Christ S 132.5 PFC
$1,325.0
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.96007B FAA $225.0 Grant/FAA
Nueces ARFF Apron Improvements $0.0
Corpus Christ 525.0 PFC
$250.0
Corpus Christi Airport Project AV.96006B FAA $225.0 Grant/FAA
Nueces Airfield Drainage lmprovement~-Phase 2 S0.0
Corpus C],,rist West GA Apron Repairs & Drainage 525.0 PFC
$250.0 Capital Reserves
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 200~ ELEMENT
AVIATION PROJECTS
(Funding in Thousands)
District Project Project Funding Federal Comments
County Number Source State
City Loc~
pro,iect Sponsor Total
Corpus Clu-isti Airport Project AV.96002 FAA $1,650.0 Grant/FAA
Nueces Land Acquisition $0.0 Future PFC
Corpus Christi $185.0 Land Acquisition Reserve
$1,835.0
Corpus Christi Aix~ort project AV.00003 FAA $1,350.0 Grant FAA
Nueces Airfield Drainage Improvements-Phase 5 $0.0
Corpus Christ Sou~hwes~ine C $150.0 PFC
$1,500.0
PORT PROJECTS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002'ELEMENT
PORT AUTHORITY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CS] Name or DesignatJen APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Project ID
District Location (From) APPN CAT 2 COST 2 State LET Date
County Lo~tion (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN Date
City Description of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRE~ Phase
Comments Funding Cate~or}, Total
Corpus Christi
Nu~ces
Co~us Christi
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary Engineering, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2003 ELEMENT
PORT AUTHORITY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Nameor Designation APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal Project ID
District Location (From) APPN CAT 2. COST 2 State LET Date
County Location (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN Date
City De~cription of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Phase
Comments Funding Cate~o~ Total
Co~us Christi
Co~pus Christi
Phase: C= Construcuon, E= Preliminary Engineenng, ROW= Right of Way, T= Transfer
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2004 ELEMENT
PORT AUTHORITY PROJECTS
(Funds in Thousands)
CSJ Name or Designation APPN CAT 1 COST 1 Federal projectlD
District Location (From) APPN CATZ COST 2 State LET Date
County Location (To) APPN CAT 3 COST 3 Local RVN D~te
City Description of work APPN CAT 4 COST 4 LCL CONTRIB Phase
Comments Fundin§ Categor~ Total
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Phase: C= Construction, E= Preliminary. Engineering, ROW~ Right of Way, T-- Transfer
FINANCIAL PLAN
FY 2002 - FY 2004 TIP FINANCIAL SUMMMARY
CORPUS CHRISTI MPO
23-Oc[-00 (Funds In T'houssuds)
"DNG
SOURCE
GTLGORY OP W=
FY02
AppOR
pYo2 pY0
PROD AlPO0.
"M
PROGR
PYM
373300.
PYa
PRC3GR
TOTAL
37 R
TOTAL
PROGR
Federal
4Ya®Mae•OpdW
0.0
OA
0.0
0.0
0.0
mo
ao
0.0
FHWA
Prajan
950.0
950.0
0.0
0.0
13329
1=9
22729
2.27L9
00
3A -NHS Mabdky
0.0
a0
0.0
00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3B-Te9MTnuk Synm
0.0
0.0
a0
0.0
0.0
QO
0.0
0.0
0.0
SG NHS ReYONutlaR
4 o
400D
a0
0.0
0.0
0.0
400.0
400.0
253921
Sll-NW l39�c M9mOBm®SyPm
1.100.0
I.WQO
1.5060
1300.0
0.0
n0
3,300.0
3)00.0
0.0
3&HHS MSvllrap
0.0
n0
a0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
1 10
1.655.1
4A-S9d9Y
mo
ISLO
0.0
010
a0
0.0
28CO
2160
40-B9kmw4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ao
0.0
0.o
0.0
4G M4papOun Maki1ily RglW
6,05.9
21379.0
20.10.5.0
0.0
6.06.0
12995.9
33,016.5
34.374.9
d6 �Makilny
0.0
10
0.0
OA
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48-2. Mab
00
all
ao
00
0.o
ao
0.0
0.0
ap sw RraMWlda
0.0
n0
0.0
0.0
a0
0.0
n0
0.0
4 RRGa9da s40aada9
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
ao
0.o
0.0
0.0
s-Ca09maMi0pm9ad AiGWYY
010
no
ao
0.0
0.o
mo
0.0
0A
6A-BliCp W Synno
0.0
0.o
129.0
125.0
0.0
0.o
125.0
IU.O
6 BMM9 SN
3x0.0
3010
155.0
155.0
0.o
0.0
455.0
455.0
12 -Caere SeslI Many
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JA
0.0
0.0
0.0
I5-DueWWadWpmj.
19,313.0
19313A
3.10.9
3]0.3
10
0.0
13.096.5
U.096.1
Vd lsd Hippy N9g�
0.0
a0
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTAL
P4daY Hip99T F9N
29.844.9
",422.0
U.6M.3
5.563.5
-]999
M,312.9
62937-5
64.310.6
Stun
7-SBa Ple9Wd9e Meulsea
10
1 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
mo
0.0
0.0
Tx
2.A-FMRddi101dW
0.0
n0
a0
0.0
0.0
10
10
0.0
SB -FM Fier l.aaetim
9.521.0
9J21.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9521.0
9,521.0
9-SY�Pvk Rotl
0.0
a0
%0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
1037-ha®e Camtl DNira
0.0
10
a0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
In. Talc Muu9a®Sn Rd4
0.0
0.o
a0
0.0
ao
0.0
0.0
0.0
ll-Swu DiavetlwYFW
5420
4410
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5410
542.0
12 -Camra Spa0pa 10 S. Fu0
9.500.0
9.5010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.500.0
9,5WA
IIA -SWC MdilkY
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
00
0.0
pe -H. BvaadWR
+.0000
1000.0
all
to
0.0
0.0
100x0
4,00.10
13GNA ADHOeOWVY
0.0
0.0
00
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
uo- UOn S. Pm
0.0
0.0
0.0
00
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
"-Slag RdaM1i
0.0
0.0
0.0
00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
I& Mh¢0aoaw(SWC F -- PM. 1
00
00
0.0
10
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
❑-PtaaipJAMial Sara S. (PA551
00
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
Goveme6 Arad
0.0
0.0
Ox
0.0
10
0.0
OA
00
TOTAL
Sme Hirhvq FWda
11,563.0
23)6).0
00
0.0
00
0.0
23.563,0
13.563,0
TOTAL
FTd
13."1.8
67.91.0
25,".3
16.5
739.9
14.313.8
96.515.5
97.05.6
Aw
Amm
0.0 li
0.01
00 I
00 I
00 1
0.01
0.0 1
0.0
I N
qy
4.000.0
4,-0 1
,. 1
00
0.0
0.0
a,W0.0
I.".O
F-0.
Cavy
+000.0
4.000.0
0.0
to
9.0
0.0
43700.0
4-0
Prajan
pkelPa6 aca
1 0.0
0.0
0.01
00 1
0.0 1
0.0
00 1
00
FM
Srmca53wfs.oe5)
'..".0
I,Ca0.0 1
2200.0
_510.0
.:370.0
1'"00
1200.0
i3N.0
F w
Salm SMlf5adW 91
5.757.3
5,75TJ
7.0 9
1,406.9
-.027.9
.027.9
21.1921
2111921
Sedw 5310(S.. 163
0.1
0.0
742
0.0
-6.2
10
1"37
0.0
Sed. S311 (Se 191
13.6
0.0
115
0.0
`.56
0.0
UJ
0.0
S. 5313(S. 26)
0.0
0.0
00
00
00
00
0.0
0.0
TOTALS
Fe FTA Pm
'.660.0
7,7573
9,695.6
9606.9
3.099.7
9.027.9
25.635A
253921
Tamm
SWC MaidF Tail PmjaW
0.0
0.0
OA
0.0
0.0
0.0
00
0.0
LCd MW f T.,Pm.
1.7532
1.753.7
21MJ
'_,166)
1.735.1
1,%1).1
5,65).1
1.655.1
ANNUAL SELF-CERTIFICATION
MPO SELF-CERTIFICATION
In accordance with 23 CI~'R 450.334, the TEXAS DEPARTIvlENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and the
Corpus Christi Metropohtan Planning Organization for the Corpus Christi urbanized area(s) hereby
certify that the transportation planning process is addressing the major issues in the metropolitan
planning area and is being conducted in accordance wnth all applicable reqmrements of:
a. 49 U.S.C. Section 5323(K), 23 U.S.C. 135, and 23 CFR Part 450.220;
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Title VI assurance executed by each
State under 23 U.S.C. 324 and 29 U.S.C. 794;
Section 1101 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21~ Century (Pub. L. 105-178)
regarding the involvement of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in FHWA and FTA
funded planning projects (Sec. I05(f), Pub. L. 97-424, 96 Stat. 2100; 49 CFR Part 23);
The provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336, 104
Stat. 327, as amended) and U.S. DOT implementing regulation; and
e. The provision of 49 CFR Part 20 regarding restrictmns on influencing certain activities.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
CORPUS CHRISTI
DISTRICT
CORPUS CHRISTI
METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATION
POLICY BOARD CHAIRPERSON
District Engineer Chairperson
Date Date
AREA MAP
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS
FY 2002 - FY 2004 TIP Public Meetings
Meetings Summary
The Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization convened eight public meetings to incorporate
public comments in the project selection proce::~ for the FY 2002 - FY 2004 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). The following is the schedule of public meetmgs:
Transportation Policy Committee Meeting, Port of Corpus Christi Authority, November 2, 2000,
at 1:30 p.m.
2. Texas Department of Transportation. VTR training center, November 6. 2000, 6:00 p.m.
3. Northwest Senior Center, November 14, 2000, I 1:00 a.m.
4. Portland City Hall, November 14, 2000, 6:00 p.m.
5. Oveal William Senior Center, November 15.2000, 11:30 a.m.
6. Corpus Christi City Hall, November 15, 2000, 6:00 p.m.
7. Technical Advisory Meeting, Port of Corpus Christi Authority., November 16, 2000, 10:00 a.m.
The draft FY 2002 - FY 2004 TIP ~vas available from October 30, 2000 to December 7, 2000, at Cities of
Corpus Christi and Portland City Halls, County Court Houses of Nueces and San Patricio, Texas
Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District, Regional Transportation Authority, and the MPO
office for the citizens to review and make comments.
The MPO staff with the Metropolitan Area entities convened the meetings at the published locations and
time. The staff thanked everyone for coming to the public meetings, parncipating in the transportation
planning process, and emphasized the need of involving citizens in the planning process. The citizens
were informed about the Metropolitan Planning process and about the TIP process.
Members of the audience were provided with a list of projects. However. the participants were insured
that the list is just a draft prelimina~ list which is subject to change dUnng the public involvement
process. The list may change based on the citizens' need in different areas.
The citizens were informed that their comments would be passed on the Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). They were encouraged to attend the TPC
meeting to emphasize their needs to the member of the decision making g-roup. The participants were
provided a copy of the MPOs Newsletter, "Metro-Mobility Talks". The MPO printed two Newsletters,
one xvith a request to the citizens both in English and Spanish about the importance of the public
participation and the other with public meetings schedule.
Transportation Policy Committee Meeting,
Port of Corpus Christi Authority, November 2, 2000
The MPO Policy Committee convened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. Approximately seven people attended
the meeting. The list of attendees is attached with these comments.
Mr. Amin Ulkarim explained the public involvement process and its importance in the preparation of
the TIP. Mr. Ulkarim explained to the TPC that we have received requests from area entities to include
several projects on FY 2002 - FY 2004 TIP list. Many of the projects were moved to priority II, since we
do not have enough funds in STP 4C (Metro Mobility Funds). The mason being that we have borrowed
funds from successive years. But on the other hand, the Texas Transportation is meeting in January 200I
and it may approve additional funds which would bring back projects like US 181 and Crosstown
Extension into Priority I list. Mr. Ulkarim also mentioned that the estimated cost of some projects on the
current I'll° is higher than the construction cost which may save some money. This savings would be
used for the ADA Accessibility Project to FY 2002 fi'om Priority 1I.
.Mr. Billy Parks said that we should not make the recommendation that the saving would be used only
for an ADA Compliance pr~ect. ADA projects should compete with other projects since we have other
necessary prOjects in the MPO area, for example the Joe Fulton IntemaUonal Comdor.
.Mr. ~min Uikarim replied that we would only bring the $600,000 ADA project which was moved to
the Priority II list.
Judge Josephine Miller said that we should go back to the TAC on how to use additional savings that
may occur.
Texas Department of Transportation
VTR training center, November 6, 2000, 6:00 p.m.
The MPO staff convened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. There were no citizens present except the
representatives of the M~O area entities.
Mr. Farhan opened the public meeting and explained the TIP planmng process and asked for any public
comments or questions.
Nlr. Ulkarim asked Mr. Jorge Garza of the City of Corpus Christi Av/ation Depat hnent to explain the
Airpo~ projects.
Mr. Jorge Garza talked about the amPort expansion plans and their relationship to projects on the FY
2002 - FY 2004 TIP. He explained about the traffic congestion inside the terminal canopy and how it is
going to be relieved by new access facilities. He explained about the funds for airport projects which are
funded through FAA grants, revenue bonds, and general obligation bonds.
Mr. Billy Parks asked about the southwest Passenger terminal and its location in the new Airport
Expansion plan.
Mr. Jorge Garza replied that the U mm will be changed to north to south position cutting down the
walking distance for passengers.
Mr. Billy Parks asked about the construction cost.
Mr. Jorge Garza said that an estimated $16.4 million for new terminal construction and the overall cost
is $36.1 million.
Northwest Senior Center, November 14, 2000, 11:00 a.m.
The MPO staffconvened the meeting at 11:00 a.m. Approximately forty three people attended the
meeting. The list of attendees is attached with these comments. The citizens focused on Leopard, Up
River Road, and some other North West area projects. The folloVnng are the questions and comments
from the public and the Ivl~O staff.
Mr. Leona Brown and many other citizens asked questions about the Leopard Street projects. They
expressed concerns about the time of construction, since the constrnetion activities are causing traffic
problems. They asked questions about the mining lanes where McKnizie (FM 3386) meets the Up River
road.
Mr. Pat Norreil explained that it usually takes about two years for these type s of projects to be
complete. He said that McKinzie is on the same highway system and city has to acquire right of way for
the turnmg lanes.
Ms. RozalizuHo and many others asked about the Up River Road prOject presence on the MPO's plan.
Mr. Farhan replied that we have three segments of Up River Road on MPO's Long Range and Short
Range plans.
Mr. Davie Cissna asked questions about CR 52 and FM 624. He was concerned about the growing
traffic demands in the North West area.
Mr. Pat Norrell explained the planning efforts of the MPO for the North West area. He explained the
US 77 projects and its impacts on the surrounding network. He said that the overpasses on CR 52, CR 48,
and FM 624 will alleviate the traffic congestion in the area.
Mr. Davie Cissna asked about the FM 624 prOject on FY 2002 - FY 2004 ILl'.
Mr. Pat Norrell replied that this is just a rehabilitation project which is part of the preventive
maintenance program.
Portland City Hail, November 14, 2000, 6:00 p.m.
The iMPO staff opened the public meeting at 6:00 p.m. About thirteen people attended the meeting
which includes citizens and Portland city officials. The public focused on the US 181 project on the FY
2002 - FY 2004 'ri/-. The following are the questions and comments passed during the meeting:
Mr. Randy Wrights explained the number of accidents on US 181 which is planned for expansion. He
said that there were 59 accidents in 1998, 62 accidents in 1999, and about 75 accidents in 2000. He said
that he supports the US 181 project.
Mr. David Kreb commented on the morning rush hour traffic which is bumper to bumper. He said that
the increase in the number of lane would reduce traffic congestion. Also, he said that development in
Ingleside and Gregory are putting traffic pressure on US 181 requiring its expansion.
Mr. Mike Tanner asked what is thc reason behind moving US 181 from FY 2001 to FY 2002? Is it the
funding issue or something else?
Mr. Billy Parks said that funding is not the problem. He smd the project is delayed for eight to nine
months due to environmental issues. TxDOT staffis working on it, since the area is critical habitat for
some birds and wetland.
Mr. James Boren had concerns about the US 181 causeway elevation in the Portland City limits which
is below the other sections of the Causeway. He said that raising the causeway is very important for both
hUmcane evacuation and emergency management. He said it would also provide a decent access to the
Interstate system.
.'Vis. Peggy Locasio said that she is very much interested in US 181 project which is used for hUmcane
evacuation.
Mr. John A. Cofas commented on the importance of the frontage road on US 181. He said without
frontage roads, one has to nm on the shoulders to merge into main lanes which is not safe.
Mr. Ron Jorgenson was concerned about hurricane evacuation and frontage road on US 181.
Ms. Barbara Skinner said that environmental problems should not supercede human needs.
Oveal William Senior Center, November 15, 2000, 11:30 a.m.
(Low Income & African~American Communi~ Area)
The MPO staff convened the meeting at I 1:30 a.m. Approximately twenty people attended the meeting.
The list of attendees is attached with the comments. The citizens concentrated on la'ansit section of the
FY 2002 - FY 2004 TI~. The citizens asked about the benefits of the TIP to the community. They asked
ifRTA is part of the M~O? Mr Farhan explained the TIP process and how MPO works with RTA. He
said that the projects on the TIP benefit the entire community and bring economic prosperity in the area.
Mr. Farhan explained about the Job Access and Reverse Commute plan and its benefits to community.
Corpus Christi City Hall, November 15, 2000, 6:00 p.m.
(Low Income & MinOrity Area)
The staff opened the public meeting at 6:00 p.m. Only four people attended the meeting as shown on
attached list.
Mr. Catarino V. Rodriguez commented on RTA and its transit service. He was concerned about the
bus drivers not stopping to pick up passengers.
Mr. Amin ~ replied that there is no reason for the bus driver not to stop at the designated bus
stop. But, if the passenger is not on the bus stop it is not allowed for the bus drivers to stop other than
designated bus stops which would cause traffic congestion and other traffic hazards.
Technical Advisory Meeting, Port of Corpus Christi Authority
November 16, 2000, I0:00 a.m.
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Chairperson opened the TAC meeting as a public meeting at
10:00 a.m. Approximately ten citizens and officials attended the meenng. Attached is the list of people
who attended the meeting. The following are questions and comments passed dunng the meeting:
Mr. Angel Escobar asked Mr Amm Ulkarim to provide a brief report on the public comments in the
public meetings conducted until now.
Mr. Amin Ulkarim replied that in the Portland City. Hall citizens spoke in favor of US 181. He said in
other meetings citizens asked about RTA and its bus service. In the meeting at the City Hall, Mr.
Rodnguez had shown his concern about the drivers behavior, sometimes they do not stop to pick up
passengers. He said that we told the citizens that we will pass their comments to the Transportation
Policy Committee. Mr. Amin Ulkanm asked Mr. Farhan to comment on other meetings where he was not
present.
Mr. Farhan said that citizens have concerns about Leopard projects construcuon. Up River Road and
McKnizie Road. Also, there were comments from public about the CR 52 and FM 624.
APPENDIX 'A'
Approximate Project Locations for ADA Accessible Ramps for FY 2002:
Everhart Road, Staples Street, Port Avenue, Baldwin Boulevard, Morgan Avenue, Kostoryz Avenue,
Home Road, Third Street, Carancahua Street, Santa Fe Street, Tancahua Street, Downtown Business
DisUnct Streets, Ocean Drive, Shoreline Boulevard. Ayers Street, Port Avenue, Agnes Street, Laredo
Street, Uptown Business District Streets, North Shoreline Boulevard, East Surfside Boulevard,
Nineteenth Street, Tarlton Street, Up River Road. Greenwood Drive, Leopard Street, Airline Road,
Weber Road, Doddridge Street, Alameda Street, Carroll Lane, Carmal Parkway, Cimmaron Boulevard,
Gollihar Road, Tiger Lane. Old Robstown Road, Texan Trail, Lipan Street, Commanche Street, Williams
Drive, Rand Morgan Road, McArdle Road Brawner Parkway, Whitecap Boulevard, Commodores Drive.
7
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
June 19,2001
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to accept funding in the
amount of $5,884 from the Texas Department of Health, Toxic Substances
Control Division, Hazard Communication Branch for the Corpus Christi-Nueces
County Local Emergency Planning Committee to conduct planning and response
activities under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to Know Act.
Ordinance appropriating $5,884 from the Texas Department of Health, Toxic
Substances Control Division, Hazard Communication Branch in the No. 1050
Federal/State Grants Fund for the Corpus Christi-Nueces County Local
Emergency Planning Committee to conduct planning and response activities
under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act; and
declaring and emergency.
ISSUE: The City of Corpus Christi and Nueces County have significant amounts
of hazardous chemicals being manufactured and/or transported within their boundaries.
With these vast amounts of chemicals comes the likelihood of accidents. To ensure that
the City and County's emergency responders are provided ~vith useful hazardous
materials information, it is essential that the Local Emergency Planning Committee
(LEPC) remains current with the latest HazMat planning software and to ensure the City
and the County will not fall into technological obsolescence.
This grant will allow the LEPC to purchase a computer along with Environmental
Systems Research Institute/Consequence Assessment Toolset (ESRI/CATS) software.
With this equipment and software the LEPC will more easily employ the current HazMat
database as well as improving the technical proficiency of the City and County's HazMat
planning capabilities. Deadline for completion of all purchases is August 31,2001 with a
final summary report and final billing with invoices and check numbers submitted to the
State by the City no later than September I, 2001.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
contracts and appropriate grant monies.
Council approval is required to authorize
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council approved the 1998 Hazardous
Materials Emergency Planning Grant from the Texas Department of Public Safety
Division of Emergency Management in the amount of $28,480 for: (a) the development
of Annex Q, (b) conducting of HazMat Tabletop Training exercises, (c) the development
of a public education program for television broadcast.
FUNDING: The grant requires that the grantee purchase all software and computer
equipment on a reimbursement basis.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the
ordinance to appropriate a grant in the amount of $5,884.00 received from the Texas
Department of Health, Toxic Substances Control Division, Hazard Communication
Branch.
~hief/LEPC Chairman
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
1. Contract
2. Award Letter
3. Ordinance
Charles E. Bell, M.D.
Executive Deputy Commissioner
TDH
Texas Department of Health
http://www, tdh.state, tx. us
100 West 4-9th Street
Austin, Texas 78756-3199
512/458-711 I
May14,2001
Sam Williams, LEPC Administrator
Nueces County LEPC
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277
Dear Mr. Williams:
I am pleased to inform you that the Texas Department of Health (TDH), Toxic Substances Control
Division, Hazard Communication Branch is prepared to award a Local Emergency Planning
Committee (LEPC) Grant to the Nueces County LEPC in the amount of $5,884. The grant is to be
applied toward the purchase of a Dell Pentium IV computer and ESRI/CATS software as specified
in the project proposal submitted to the Branch by the Nueces County LEPC.
The grant is pursuant to the provisions in the Manufacturing Facility Community Right-To-Know
Act and the Non-manufacturing Facilities Community Right-To-Know Act, Chapters 505 and 507 of
the Health and Safety Code, which allow TDH to award grants to LEPCs to assist in fulfilling their
emergency planning responsibilities under the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-
To-Know Act.
This grant will cover the period from June 1,2001 to August 31,2001. A contract that details the
funding obligations will be sent to you soon. A member of the Hazard Communication Branch staff
will contact you with further details. Please be advised that costs incurred prior to June 1,2001,
will not be reimbursed.
Congratulations on your successful proposal. Our entire staff is looking forward to working with
you to achieve your goals as you seek to improve the safety of Texans in your county. If you have
any questions or need assistance, please contact Keith Helmers at (800) 452-2791 (toll-free) or
(512) 834-6603.
Sincerely,
ullerr~ ~ ~
ommissioner for
tal and Consumer Health
Equal Employment Opportunity Employer
2001 LEPC Grants
LEPC Orqanization Amount
Van Zandt County $3,102
Comal County $6,000
El Paso County $6,000
Potter & Randall County $5,889
Fayette County $6,000
Bowie County $5,997
Pasadena County $6,000
Hardin County $5,929
Galveston County $5,500
Nueces County $5,884
Hidalgo County $6,000
Proiect
Purchase of Dell Latitude C 800 Computer, 1 HD Laser Jet 1100 SE
Printer, 1 GPS and Software, and 1 AG-1563 Power Adapter Kit.
Publish annual notice in the New Braunfels Herald Zeitung Newspaper
and the Times Guardian Newspaper. Purchase a Wally Wise costume,
Wally wise membership kit, Motorola HT1000 handheld two-way radio
and a Hewlett Packard Fax 910.
Purchase 125 First Alert WX.-67 Weather Alert Radios.
Purchase 10 Palm m505 Handheld radios, 10 PalmModem Connectivity
Kits, and 10 Palm Travel Chargers.
Purchase a Notebook computer, a desk top computer with printer, a HP
Laser Jet 2100 M printer and the CAMEO program.
Purchase a Rainwise WS-2000 Wireless Weather Station, a Rainwise
WS 2000 Computer Interface, Pentium III laptop computer, and a Type Ii
Motorola radio.
Purchase shelves, light kit, header, logo panels, text panels, and throws
for display both. Purchase 13" 'I-VNCR D2,ewoo DVN-14F6N, HP Scan
jet 6300se/6350se Professional Series Color scanner, Pentium I11 Power
Spec PC, Magnavox 107E 17" Computer monitor, 2000 Wally Wise
coloring books, 2880 Wally Wise Crayons, and 1000 Wally Wise
Magnets. Also publish an annual notice in the Pasadena Citizen.
Purchase a Compaq Armada E500 PIII-800mhz Laptop Computer, a Soft
Nylon Carrying Case, a Replacement LCD Lamp and a 3M Model
MP8635 portable projector.
Purchase web site development and news router services from Read
Communications, LLC.
Purchase a Dell Pentium IV computer, and ESRI/CATS software.
Hire a trainer for eight 4-hour DOT training courses and conduct a
project management and training exercise.
,4n Equal Employment Opportlmiry Employer
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $5,884 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION, HAZARD
COMMUNICATIONS BRANCH IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE
GRANTS FUND FOR THE CORPUS CHRISTI-NUECES COUNTY LOCAL
EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT PLANNING AND
RESPONSE ACTIVITIES UNDER THE EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That $5,884 from the Texas Department of Health, Toxic Substances
Control Division, Hazard Communications Branch is appropriated in the No. 1050
Federal/State Grants Fund for the Corpus Christi-Nueces County Local Emergency
Planning Committee to conduct planning and response activities under the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon
ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect
upon first reading as an emergency measure on this the __ day of
,2001.
ATTEST:
THE ClTYOFCORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: This 8th day of June, 2001:
James R. Bray, City Attorney
By: R. J~'~eeinin~'~
Fir~,t A§sistant City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
R 11108A2.wpd
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 12, 2001
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to submit a
grant application to the General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council in the
amount of $60,000 for a Hike and Bike Trail on Gypsy Street, with a $40,000 match
from Padre Island Property Owners Association.
B. Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to submit a
grant application to the General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council for a Hike
and Bike Trail on Encantada Avenue in the amount of $60,000, with a $40,000 match
from Padre Island Property Owners Association.
C. Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee to submit a
grant application to the General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council for a
Bayfront Redevelopment Study in the amount of $50,000, with a $33,333 cash match,
for a total project cost of $83,333.
ISSUE: The Texas General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council administers the
Coastal Management Program (CMP) grants. Pre-applications for CMP grants are due
June 20, 2001. Final applications are due October 10, 2001. If funded, projects will begin
October 2002. Grant requests are limited to $60,000 for construction projects and $50,000
for non-construction projects.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the three grant applications.
W. Thomas Utter
Assistant City Manager
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
A. Gypsy Street - Hike and Bike: The City of Corpus Christi, in concert with the Padre Island Property
Owners Association, proposes to improve shoreline access by constructing a one-mile long trail on Gypsy
Street from Whitecap Boulevard to Encantada Avenue. This will provide beach-goers safer access to the
beach from the Intracoastal Waterway to beach areas and from interior areas of the island. The improved
access will also link to Gypsy Park and the public boat ramp area, which are situated on Gypsy Street and
adjacent to the canals. The improved access, which is parallel to South Padre Island Drive, will provide a safer
route for pedestrian and bicyclists to access Padre Balli County Park and will reduce individual traffic through
the sand dunes.
The Padre Isles Property Owners Association has committed to providing the 40% match required for the
project. (See attached letter)
This project will compliment a recently funded project to construct a hike and bike trail along Whitecap
Boulevard from the Intracoastal Waterway to Padre Island Drive, which is scheduled to begin October 2001.
B. Encantada Avenue - Hike and Bike: The City of Corpus Christi, in partnership with the Padre Isles
Property Owners Association, proposes to construct an additional Hike and Bike trail within the City
easements on Encantada Avenue. Encantada Avenue is a public mad dedicated to the City of Corpus Christi
and maintained by the City of Corpus Christi. The construction of the new hike and bike trail will begin at
Gypsy, and will continue east on Encantada Avenue to Park Road 22. The newly constructed Hike & Bike
Path will pass the Seashore Learning Center and will provide a safe mute to beach areas.
The Padre Isles Property Owners Association has committed to providing the 40% match required for the
project. (see attached letter)
This project will compliment a recently funded project to construct a hike and bike trail along Whitecap
Boulevard from the Intracoastal Waterway to Padre Island Drive, which is scheduled to begin October 2001.
C. Bayfront Redevelopment Study: The City of Corpus Christi is proposing to conduct a preliminary
feasibility investigation to revitalize the Bayfmnt for ecotourism development, develop a conceptual
engineering design, and develop probable costs involved. The investigation will include developing a plan that
will balance the benefits of economic development and multiple human uses of the Bayfront, while preserving
the coastal natural resources.
In many areas in Texas, the revitalization effort has been focused on ecotoudsm According to the 1999 Texas
Destination report, Corpus Christi showed exceptionally high representation of tourism for activities relating
to nature; beach and waterfront; outdoor sports; hunting and fishing; boating and sailing; gambling; historic
sites; touring; site seeing; museum, concert and play; and nightlife. Recently community citizens have
proposed two separate projects that will increase toudsm in our community. Leon Loeb has proposed South
Wharf, a waterside commercial development south of the Marina. His vision includes a public-private venture
to enhance the public bayfront experience and stimulate adjacent downtown development. Pat Veteto has
proposed the Bayfront Park, which would be located north of the Marina. The proposed Bayfront Park would
create large upland public land areas, beaches, and wetlands with dredge material from the Corpus Christi
Ship Channel and La Quinta Channel.
While these two proposed projects are very different, they both focus on the redevelopment of the Bayfront
for ecotourism and economic development. This study will investigate these two concepts as a redevelopment
of the Bayfront for economic development and ecotourism.
P( A
PADRE ISLES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
14013 FORTUNA BAY DRIVE · CORPUS CHRISTI, TXTg41g-6327 · (361)949-7025
HU; :,:: ' ' '
· ,.,1 R~$OU,,?C.~$ "
June 12, 2001
Patricia Garcia
Illt~rgovemmental Relations SpeciMint
Office of Intergovernmemal Relations
City of Corpus Christi
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, TX 78469
Dear Ms. Garcia:
The Padre Isles Property Owners Association will contn'bute 40% in service or
cash to the CMP Grants proposals upon acceptance. The Padre Island Business
Association and other Island residents have agreed to donations of seawiees to assist in
the completions of the Gypsy and Encan*.cla Hike and Bike Trails on the Isiaud.
Please contact me if you need further information, or ifI can be of any assistance.
~/~ WalkeEx~.tve C o o rd.~or
Padre Isles Property Owners Association
Scale:
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR THE CITY MANAGER'S
DESIGNEE, TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GENERAL
LAND OFFICE COASTAL COORDINATION COUNCIL IN THE
AMOUNT OF $60,000 FOR A HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL ON GYPSY
STREET, WITH A $40,000 MATCH FROM PADRE ISLAND PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, is authorized to submit
a grant application to the General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council in the
amount of $60,000 for a hike and bike trail on Gypsy Street. The City match for this
grant is $40,000, which will be donated by the Padre Island Property Owners
Association in, for a total project costs of $100,000.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: 14th day of June, 2001.
James R. Bray Jr.
City Attorney
By:
R. J in i-~n g"~/
F~s~istant City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
gypsy-resolution.doc
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR THE CITY MANAGER'S
DESIGNEE, TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GENERAL
LAND OFFICE - COASTAL COORDINATION COUNCIL FOR A HIKE
AND BIKE TRAIL ON ENCANTADA AVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$60,000, WITH A $40,000 MATCH FROM PADRE ISLAND PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, is authorized to submit
a grant application to the General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council in the
amount of $60,000 for a hike and bike trail on Encantada Avenue. The match for this
grant is $40,000, which will be donated by the Padre Island Property Owners
Association, for a the total project cost of $100,000.
ATTEST:
THE CiTY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: 14th day of June, 2001.
James R. Bray Jr.
City Attorney
~,. J/a'y,,J~ein i n~
Fi~t Assistant City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
Encantada.doc
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR THE CITY MANAGER'S
DESIGNEE, TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GENERAL
LAND OFFICE COASTAL COORDINATION COUNCIL FOR A
BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT STUDY IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000
WITH A $33,333 CASH MATCH AND A TOTAL PROJECT COST OF
$83,333
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, is authorized to submit
a grant application to the General Land Office - Coastal Coordination Council for a
Bayfront Redevelopment Study in the amount of $50,000, with a cash match of $33,333
and a total project cost of $83,333.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: 14th day of June, 2001.
James R. Bray Jr.
City Atto~/ .~
R. J/a~y I~'eining
First Assistant City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
bayfront-resolution doc
9
June 14, 2001
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor S. Loyd Neal and City Council Members
George Noe, Deputy City Manager
Michael N. Gunning, Director of Plannin~,
0501-02 Dnnhi!l Enterprises, L.L.C.: "A-I" Apartment House Disaict to "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District
The applicant, Mr. And Mrs. James Stevenson, submitted a written request (see attached letter) asking City Council
to approve a "RE" Residential-Estate District in lieu of the "R-lB" One-Family Dwelling District as originally
applied for and recommended by plarmmg comrmssion and Staff. On the advice of their banker, the Stevenson's
are now proposing to develop a large lot single-family subdivision to reduce their financial risks in testing the
market with the "industrialized" or "modular" type single-family homes in a subdivision with substantially fewer
homes. Although the Planning comrmssiun is not aware of this new request, it should assumed the comrmssion
would support a "RE" Residential-Estate District in that it would have less of an impact than the recommended
"R-lB" District.
COMPARISON of the "R-lB" and "RE" Districts:
"R-lB" One-Family Dwelling
"RE" Residential Estate
Density
7.26 Dwelling Units Per Acre
1 Dwelling Unit Per Acre
Min. Lot Size 6,000 sf. I acre
Proposed Subdivision 73 Dwelling Units
15 Dwelling Units
Staffsupports the applicam's request for a "RE" District in that it would have less of an impact to the neighborhood
in terms of street and other infrastructure. City Council has several options. They are as follows:
1. Deny, the "R-1B" District and in lieu thereof approve a "RE" District (ordinance attached).
Discussion: Would allow approximately 15 dwelling umts and rural type street construction.
2. Approve the "R-lB" District as requested.
Discussion: Applicam could still develop the one-acre lot subdivision, however, they would be required to
install the full street section with curb, gutter and sidewalks.
3. Refer "RE" District zoning request back to Plannmg Commission for their input.
Discussion: The next available Planmng comrmssion is July 18, 2001. If referred to the Comlmssion, this
case would not be scheduled on the City Council agenda until mid to late August 2001. The time delay would
be a detriment to the applicant in completing the purchase of the property, and securing the necessary financing.
Based on prior Planning Comrmssion input, they most likely would prefer the "RE" District over the more
intense "R-lB" District.
Dur~hill Enterprises, L.L.C.
Case No. 0501-02
June 14, 2001
Page 2
Deny the "R-lB".
Discussion: The Zoning Ordinance would prohibit the reffling of a zoning change on all or a portion of the
subject property for two (12) mon~, unless the waiting period is waived by City Council.
Attachments: Dunhill Enterpn~ ~-s letter (Jane 13, 2001)
"RE" Residential-Estate District Ordinance
IIlIIIU EIITEBPBISES, LLP,.
,luBe 13, 2001
Vis F~imGb, # (36D 880-3590
Mr. Michel N. Gunnin~
Din~tor of PIa~;,,g
P.O. Box 9277
City Hall - 1201. Leop~l
Corpus Cl~is~ TX 78469-9277
~ No. 0501.O2;
Lot 15; Block 52 Fiout Bluff& Encinal Farm & Garckn Tracts
Pursuant to the pending request for a c~ of zonlng from"A-l" to "R-1W', we
bare trot with om bet/re' on sevend occasiom to discu~ om' proposed pioject of a
residential subdivision with ~:*~-,,d housing. In light of the ~'t that we warn to test
the mm'kct for thc "industrialized housing" comept, we nrc rexluesting council to coradder
¢Au~' g tl~ pendlng r~lucst from"R-lB" to "RE", ~ w~ll a~low us to test the ~.ia~ket
If you have ~ questiom or roquire additional info~ pirie do not hesitate
to contm:t n~ at (361) 949-0927. Th,mit you for ),out consideration and a~stance
~mti~ tl~ ,~.~er.
(361)949.48US* FoI:(361) ~J~*lT'lU ' 1~.0. I~zI~I4T'/ · C4xpmCkril~T~lS0-14')'7
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY
DUNHILL ENTERPRISES, L. L. C., BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP
IN REFERENCE TO LOT 15, SECTION 52, FLOUR BLUFF AND
ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, FROM "A-I" APARTMENT
HOUSE DISTRICT TO "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT;
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY
DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations conceming the application of Dunhill Enterprises for amendment to
the zoning ordinance and zoning map of the City of Corpus Chdsti;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
May 23, 2001, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 19,
2001, dudng a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the
City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and
be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Chdsti and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by changing the zoning of Lot 15, Section 52, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm
and Garden Tracts, located on the north side of Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 650
feet east of Waldron Road, from ~'A-1" Apartment House District to "RE" Residential
Estate District.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
H:\\LEGAL~.~,W~LEG-
DIR~DOYLEDCURTfS\MYDOCS~.00 I\P&ZORD0 I~ZONING.ORD\DOYLEC~2001~Z050102B.DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Chdsti as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 7. That upon wdtten request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the ~,ccd for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 19th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM June 13, 2001
James R. Bray, Jr.
City AJ~o~ey . /'), ,
By: ~/-.~~,,~~-' ~
'Doy~ D/~I~~
Senior ~sistant City Attorney
H:\~LEGAL\LAW~LEG-
DIR\DOYLEDCURTIS~MYDOCS~2001\P&ZORD01~ONING.ORD\DOYLEC~001~050102B,DOC
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: June 19, 2001)
Case No. 0501-02~ Dunhill Enterprises~ L.L.C.: A change of zoning from an "A-I" Apartment
House District to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts,
Section 52, Lot 15, located on the nortk ~ide of Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 650 feet east of Waldron
Road.
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (05/23/01): Approved.
Requested Council Action: Approval of the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and adoption of the
attached orcFmance.
Purpose of Request: To develop a single-family subdivision.
Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from an "A-I" Apartment House District to an "R-lB"
One-family Dwelling District in order to develop a single-family residential subdivision. The subdivision is planned
to contain modular buildings instead of the conventional on-site built homes. However, on-site built homes will also
be permitted. Modular homes are not to be confused with manufactured homes. Modular homes are permitted by
State law in any zoning district that penmts residential uses. Manufactured homes are allowed only in the "T-lB"
Manufactured Home Park and "T-lC" Manufactared Home Subdivision Districts. The difference between a
modular home and a manufactured home is based on State-mandated standards and classification.
Single-family residential development is allowed in the current "A-I" District, but required to provide wider streets
and larger water and sewer lines than if it were zoned an "R-lB" District. The "R-lB" District also protects single-
family character from encroaching multiple-family and non-residential uses. The subject property is located
between partially developed commercial properties, "B-Y' Business District, on the west and single-family
residences, "R-lB" District to the west with direct access to a collector street. Yorktown Boulevard. As requested,
the "R-lB" District is an expansion of the "R-lB" District adjacent to the north, south, and east. The proposed
development will have to comply with the building height and setback requirements, as well as with the off-street
parking and open space requirements of the City. These modular homes are constructed in Houston and will be
shipped and assembled on site. Ail foundation work will be required to be in place and inspected by the City before
the homes are installed.
Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning ComnUssion and Staff's recommendation.
Cormmssioners voted 6 to I in favor of the rezoning.
Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, forty-three (43) notices were mailed to the property owners
within a 200-foot radius, of which one (1) was returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. A notice in
favor was submitted from outside the notification area. The 20% rule is not in effect, h
,
Michael N. Gunmng, AICP /
Director of Planning
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
1) AICUZ Map Page 2
2) Zoning Report Pages 3-14
3) Commems Received Page 15
4) Planning Commission Minutes Page 16-17
5) Ordinance Pages 18-I9
H:~P LN -DIR~ERMA\WORD~AGEN DM EM\0501-02AGENDAM EMO DOC
/
AFZ-I
Alt tNSTALLATION COMpATIIBILITT
USI ZONE (AICUZ)
NAVY TglO AICU:[ UFDAI'ID STUDY
SITE
CASE N0.0501-02
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No.:
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
Map No.:
Applicant:
Legal Description/Location:
0501-02
May 23, 2001
112-15, 16 (F18C)
Dunhill Enterprises, L.L.C.
Flour Bluffand Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 52, Lot 15, located on the north side of
Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 650 feet east of Waldron Road.
20 acres
Same as above.
"A-I" Apartment House District
"R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District
Undeveloped land.
Develop a single-family subdivision.
Not applicable.
Area of Request:
Lot(s) Area:
Current Zoning:
Request:
Current Use of Property:
Purpose of Request:
Zoning Change Requested Due
to Notice of Violation:
Adiacent Zoning:
North, South, East -"R-IB" One-family Dwelling District
West - "B-3" Business District and "I-2" Light Industrial District
Adiacent Land Use:
North - Undeveloped land.
South - (across Yorktown Boulevard) Undeveloped land.
East - Single-family residences.
West - Mini-storage facility, retail store, church and undeveloped land.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0501-02 (Dnnhi11 Enterprises. L.L.C.)
Page 2
Number of Residential Units Allowed:
"R-lB" - 145 units (7.26 dwelling units per acre)
"A-i" - 435 units (21.78 dwelling units per acre)
Estimated Traffic Generation:
Single-family residence - 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 145 dwelling
units = 1,450 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Adiaeent Streets/Classification:
a) Yorktown Boulevard - collector
Right-of-Way Design
Current:
a) 80-foot right-of-way with a 24-foot wide rural paved section.
Planned:
a) 70-foot right-of-way with a 48-foot back-to-back paved section.
1996 Traffic Count (24-hour, ~veekdav~ non-directional):
a) 2,670 vehicles per day.
Zoning History of Property:
There has been no rezoning activity, within the past five (5) years.
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
In July 1996, Lot 13, located on the east of Waldron Road, north of Yorktown Boulevard and west
of the subject property, was denied a change of zordng to an "I-2" District, and in lieu thereof, was
granted a Special Permit for enclosed boat storage.
Zoning Inventory:
The subject property is the only 20-acre parcel of land zoned an "A-I" District in the area. Adjacent
to the north, south, and east, there are 2,620 acres of land zoned an "R-1B" District that contains a
mixture of undeveloped land, single-family residences and an air training field. Adjacent to the west,
there are 17.72 acre of land zoned a "B-3" District and contains mini-storage facility, boat storage,
Zoning Report
Case No. 0501-02 (Dunhill Enterprises, L.L.C.)
Page 3
retail store, church and undeveloped land. Northwest fi-om the subject property, the area contains
57.28 acres of land with single-family residences, a church and undeveloped land.
Planning Staff Analysis:
General Characteristics and Backm'ound: The applicant has requested a change of zoning
from an "A-i" ApatUnent House District to an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District in order
to develop a single-family residential subdivision. The subdivision is planned to contain
modular buildings instead of the conventional on-site built homes. However, on-site built
homes will also be permitted. Modular homes are not to be confused with manufactured
homes. Modular homes are permitted by State law in any zoning district that permits
residential uses. Manufactured homes are allowed only in the "T-lB" Manufactured Home
Park and "T-lC" Manufactured Home Subdivision Districts. The difference between a
modular home and a manufactured home is based on State-mandated standards and
classification.
Single-family residential development is allowed in the current "A-1" District, but required
to provide wider streets and larger water and sewer lines than if it were zoned an "R-lB"
District. The "R-lB" District also protects single-family character from encroaching
multiple-family and non-residential uses. The subject property is located between partially
developed commercial properties, "B-3" Business District, on the west and single-family
residences, "R-lB" District to the west with direct access to a collector street, Yorktown
Boulevard. As requested, the "R-lB" District is an expansion of the "R-lB" District
adjacent to the north, south, and east. The proposed development will have to comply with
the building height and setback requirements, as well as with the off-street parking and open
space requirements of the City. These modular homes are constructed in Houston and will
be shipped and assembled on site. All foundation work will be required to be in place and
inspected by the City before the homes are installed.
Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall, the
Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested zoning. The Flour Bluff
Area Development Plan's future land use map recommends the area to develop with medium
density residential. The requested "R-lB" District permits a density within the allowable
density of the medium density residential. Therefore, the requested "R-lB" District is
consistent with the adopted Plan's future land use map.
Potential Housing Density: The existing "A-I" District permits a density of 21.78 dwelling
units per acre or 435 units on the subject property. As requested, the 'R-lB" District permits
a density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre or 145 units on the subject property, Approval of
the change in zoning will reduce the total number of residential units by 67 percent.
Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: An "A-i" District requires a fi'ont yard setback of twenty (20)
feet with a side and rear yard setback often (10) feet for the first floor and an additional five
(5) feet for a floor above the first. The "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of 25
Zoning Report
Case No. 0501-02 (Dunhill Enterprises, L.L.C.)
Page 4
feet with a side and rear yard setback,of five (5) feet each. Buildings in the "A-I" and
"R-lB" Districts are limited to three (3) stories with the "A-I" District allowing 45 feet and
the "R-lB" District allowing 35 feet.
Signage: The "A-I" District permits either one wall sign with an area of forty (40) square
feet or one freestanding sign with an area of forty (40) square feet and a height often (10)
feet. Si~ in the "R-lB" District are limited to one wall sign xvith an area of one square
foot.
Traffic: As currently zoned, the subject property could develop with 435 apartment units that
could generate approximately 2,814 daily trip ends (6.47 average daily trip ends per dwelling
unit). The requested "R-lB" District would allow 145 units that could generate
approximately 1,450 daily trip ends. The rezoning would reduce the traffic by almost half.
Access to the subject property would be from Yorktown Boulevard, a collector.
Parking/Screening: Detached single-family residential development is required to provide
two (2) off-street parking spaces for each dwelling trait. Compliance with the off-street
parking regulations will be required during the permitting phase of the development.
Costs to City: There may be a cost to the City when Yorktown Boulevard is built to its
planned width. Development of the proposed project will not require the improvement of
Yorktown Boulevard. The Flour Bluff Area Development Plan recommends that the
segment of Yorktown Boulevard between Waldron and Laguna Shores Roads, be included
in the Capital Improvement Program as a high priority.
Platting: The subject property is a platted lot. However, it is the applicant's intent to submit
a subdivision plat to create individual lots.
Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.)
a)
The requested "R-1B" District is an expansion of the "R-lB" District adjacent to the north,
south, and east.
b)
The requested "R-1B" District is consistent with the adopted Flour Bluff Area Development
Plan's future land use map.
c) Approval of the rezoning will reduce the potential traffic generated.
Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.)
a) None.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0501-02 (Dunhill Enterprises, L.L.C.)
Page 5
Attachments:
Zoning and Ownership Map
Ownership List
Flour Bluff Area Location Map
CITYHALL02\USERS~P LN-DIR\ERMA\WO RD~ZONRPTS\0501-02 RE PORT.DOC
7
R-lB
R-lB
-lB
T-lC []
Moy 17, 2001
CASE Z0501-02
7
Subject property
O~mere within 200 feet listed on etteched mmership lis
· - Property Owner in Favor
N~INEX X - Property Owner Opposed
See Comments on Page(s)
APPLICANT: DUNHILL ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.
P. 0. BOX 181477 78480
REPRESENTATIVE: RANDY THOMPSON
144 CORDULA 78411
QUERY. PLANNING/LX3RRFORT
w
PAGE 1
LX LABELS
PROPERTY ONNHR REPORT
05/08/01 15.36:60
ADDRESS ]
CITY
6T ZIP
CASE# TAX ID LEGAL DESCRIPTION OIMER
"DROSS 1
CORNS CHRISTI
TO 18666
ENC PPA DON MC AUDUBON OVTKKHl CLOS OP C
P O BOY 1151
5156 S STAPLES M ]
ZO501-0;}�.B 1676 0053-0010 FLOUR BLUFF i
SV56 E STAPLES STE J
CORPUS CHRISTI
T%'IBKS.-�
•��
n+ T 16.066 ACS OF LTS 1 f 1 SEC AUDUBON OUTDOOR CLUB OF C
!-a'BD% �ii5:
-n0.^
�+-°O.
5956F&IAPLES„a'CJ
CORP119 CNPIMI-
TO 78665.
ANOtlB01#'01RBBDR'WUL-OR'L
CO-BOY.-]lfi
Siff-.ppii-BOiO 5]
RRW8a11R0BTt
M18F-iE6B5
' O�emOne GWB-BLC
.Y•O•BOX�Ni>•
B6if.pRfB.iffB FLOURINI Rlif FIIY
r�ygppRR�}}---E%-0MfF-
1c�66 ACA OF l.T'.j„j-jj-$EG. AUM=hLQL y]OB CLUB OP C
-P O'1f0% -33s7,
lll_il--
CpRPU32NRiIIT["'�"TB66F_
�-OUTDOoA MOB OP C
4 O BOX -3M
1fAi-0858-8M65]
5156 S STAPLES M J
CORPUS CHRISTI
TO 7#665
I VAN GDN TRAC AUDUBON OUTDOOR CLUB OF C
P O BOX 1352
—��2476 0053-0030 FLOUR BLUFF 6 ENC
5756 B STAPLES STE J
CORPUS CHRISTI
TO 78665
ACS OUT LTB J TNRU 6 AUDUBON OAI'DODP CLUB OF C
P O BOX ]JS]
7uA-a05L 0"14 T 65.9063
Jyppyy,6Alpjiv
tlI 78665
v
AUO i^" ^^'^•V�o. Tjj, QfUf 1751
f3if 0
f37B'003Z`BB9O BEC s3
CORNB'CNAISI't --.
TY 76465.
9r
^^30 i1L1UR OLIlAP .4
.T% 7666R
O
3
1436=R051.0030_ISSw906J'RCB'0111"OTB'.]TMtl'B'#V0000IlTA1Z
.CORPUS CHRISTI
VORPUS CH
T% 18660
4ODUBDN OUTDOOR rum C
BOX -5153
1lJ i -405]-483 0-'ERf_� ]
11015 AAMVILLE RD
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78610
FLOUR BLUFF f ENC PPM GON TMC BRANDEL WA
FOUNDATION INC
� X 78610
S� ��3616-0051-0150
T
A TOA INC
27015 ANNAV3ULff-RD
�BPDi.CAB1STl
T 30 ACS QUI' OF S/3 OF LT 15 E BRANDEL pOH
�E�
19M�R5'1-0130
130]5-RANAV ILLE.RD
•NRPUB CHRISTI-
T%-98610
(MNOIDEtLON
PgMDATRON�BNC
]626�8&].R1L0 EC 51
21015 ANNAVILLE91D
CBRlI1S "RIM
TY •78610
1676-OOi].OlfO- N
•1101$' ANNAVTUX'RD
CORM CHRISTI.
TA -98410.
#CB OUP OF 8/3.OV-"S .R.BBINBEL]70N
3f76'.00S3.060-T-10
IST]
Tr 7{fyy
3676-0052-0150 Be 42 BMNUGL W4
CORWS-tMR15Ti—'
TX-45401676-DG5]-0150
1Ilizar
PUR BLU!►1 'ODN EMO BRANDEL 1411]
IAaMClRM
AHwlP tt=R RD
CORWS-" iii1.
. duo
OIR OP S/1 or LT 15 B BRANDSL DON
11035 AMNAVILLS RD
1616.0062-0150 T SO ACS
E
C]1PP11R`BHR23TI'
TI 7B410
BRANDEL DOM
.11015 AANAVI LLS, PD
2616-0053-0150 9C 52
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78610
11035 ANNAVILLE RD
9201 S.P.I.D.
)f_'�3676 -0053-0155 FLOUR BLUFF f ENC PPM WH TMC BPENOEL WNc
1t0i5- ANNAYlLLE-RO
93 n 1 O
1 ,g V3TT0T55T 10 ACS OUT OP N/3 OP LT 15 S BAEMeE43YLi
T%yN10—
1102& AWARjLU"D
930Y SY:1:0.
COIIFUB CHRISTI
X61.. WH
QUERY. PLANNING/LX3RRFORT
w
05/00/01 IS:36:40
PAGE 2
LX LABELS
PROPERTY OWNER REPORT
CASED
TAX 10
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OWNER
ADDRESS 1
Z0501 02
Txr2B"L-
BLU pp c ENC FEW GDN TUC
BRENGEL DON
11025 ANNAVILLE,RD
3643
39]6-00@3.0155
T 10 aQS ODT GF B/2 QF LT 15 S
IRLNUL DON
11035 ANNAVILLS RD
1D -833T_01_-
247 SADO52-0155-EC
52
BR5NDEL OQy -
11EZS'WffAOSS6'RD
�•�
ID 63703
-L JOSEPH 6 6R
HAMILY TRUST'
ID 63703
T N3.35 ACS OUT OF 610 ACS LL-bl.EYMAIER
JOSEPH S OR
FAMILY TRUST
DALLAS
2476-0052-01&A_W�2
BLOYMATER JOSEPH $ SR
FAMILY TRUST
Tx 75306.
243 G=0052-016]
FLOUR BLUFF ( ENC FRN DON TMC
BLEYMAIER JOSEPH S JR ET
6645 LAKESIDE DRIVE
-EMIR
2476-0052-0163
T N2.35 ACS OUT OF SIO ACS LT
BLEYMAIER JOSEPH S JR ET
6645 LAKESIDE DRIVE
1620 LIGAN
24260052-0 63
16 SEC 52
WYMfMBN-.IDSEptl.-S R ET
.165
6666. LAKESIDE DRIVE
TX 70411,-,
3476 0052 0
FLOUR BLUFF ( CNC FRM GDN TRAC
GARZA MANUEL
109 N ROSEMONT
CORPUS CHRISTI
2476-0053.0165
T E2.35 ACS OUT OF S 5 ACS LT
t:ARZA MANIIEL
1G4 N ROSEMONT
2176.0052 O1G5
16 SEC 521
GARZA MAGGEL
109 N ROSEMONT
Tx 70410
3476-0052-0168
FLOUR BLUFF ( ENC FEW GDN TUC
GARZA DOMINGO C
C/0 MRS RUBEN C GARZA CTA
BOG "TON
2476-0053-0160
T 52.35 ACS OUT OF W7.5 PCS LT
Gnv n DOMINGO C
(ZIP. DORS RUBEN C GARZA 73TA
2476-0052-0168
16 SEC 52
^ Iwuxx-Q
CFg,tlRS_SIWUSW C-GARZA ETA
3426-0052-0166
FLOUR BLUFF G ENC FRM DON TUC
GARZA DOMINGO C ETUX DEC'
%AEMIM GARZA GONZALEZ ET
3416-0052-0168'i:
ST.7 -ACS-OUT OF -WT: SEV LbfAIlL-RONiNtAG.CRiEJ3EC'
AARMIDA GARZA-WNZALEZ-ET
2476-0053-0168
16 SEC 52-
GARZA DOMINGO C ETVX .DSC'
URHIDA GARZA GONZALEZ ET
�..._
3476,00520170
FLOUR BLUFF ( SNC FEW WN TMC
BROOKE SHERRY Slq"a
P.O. BOA 637•
2415_Q052-0170
T 1 AC OUT LT 17 SEC 52
BIR(K)KE SIIERRY SIGLER ...-..-
• -P.O 804 637
2476-0053-0170
FLOUR BLUFF ( ENC FRM GDN TUC
SALOMONSEN JONNY
4017 WALDRON RD
2A1G-0611-61410
T 1 AC OUT LT 17 SEC 52
SALOMOHSEH .TUNNY
4012.NALOEOp1 RD
3476-0052-0180
FLOUR BLUFF ( ENC FEW GM TUC
SO TSUNG CHOW ET UX
2150 ARECA PALM
✓OW2476-0052-0180
T N/2 OF LT 10 SEC 52. 10 ACS
SO TSUNG CHOW ET UX
2150 MEU ULM
QUERY, PLANNING/I.x3REPOYT
PAGE 2
ADDRESS 2
CITY
ST ZIP
CORPUS CHRISTI
TA.784111
COlM1}bN!}!fI
Txr2B"L-
WIIPOS'CRKTSTI
TX wA4Aa
3643
10.Q 701 4
3647 MYWODO DRIVE
B.9(SE .
1D -833T_01_-
3647 MAYWOOD DRIVE-
BOISE -'
10 63104•
BOISE
ID 63703
BOISE
ID 63703
1p;W.-
FD IJ703
DALLAS
Tx 75306
DALLAS
Tx 75306.
DALLAS
xx 75200
1630 LIPAN
CORPUS CHRISTI
Tx 70401
1620 LIFAN
CORPUS CHRI§TI
TX 70400
1620 LIGAN
COqQUS MRI5.11
,Tx 70401
5209-CURTIS TIJ1RK '
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX 70411,-,
5]09 CURTIS CLARK
CORPUS CHRIST]
TE U L
5209 CURTIS CLARK
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX i0i1
WIMBERLEY
.-- TK lAku `
EINBERLEY
TX 70676
CORPUS CHRISTI
Tx 70410
CORPUS CHRISTI
TR 76410'
BOG "TON
PL 33432
BOLA "TON
•FL•33432,
05/0B/01 15�36i40
L% LABELS
PROPERTY OWNER REPORT
PAGE 3
CASE#
TAX 10
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OWNER
ADDRESS 1
ADDRESS 2
CITY
ST ZIP
20501 01
9953-0001"0010
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 1 B% 1
CANTO RAIL L ET U%
3701 MATTESON ST
CORPUS CHRISTI
i% 78418
2.,-�
9952-00010020
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 2 SK 1
CANRI RAIIL L ET U%
3701 MATTESON ST
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
94Gi-Liii-BHPY0RKi6MN
H
C/0-ROIIALR-6-T DOR'BT'U%
3.�T
j 78418
99Sy9Py}-8080.
1
DOGAF-MBtiRI3R F
C/4>-RDNAL�R- ET UX
3710 MATTRSON ST
CORPUS CHRISTI
IL V� 9952-0001-0030
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LTS 3 1 1 BK
TAYLOR RONALD L AND
PATRICIA M TAYLOR UPS
3710 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
r96a-600r-0036
1
LD ( AND
PATRSCMTYTRSLOR HPE
111011PTfBSONSTREET
CORPUO-EHRISTI
TX ;-18
995]-0001
OJ50
YORK"1'ONN
HEIGHTS
LT 5 B% 1
TAYLOR R I, Y PATRICIA M W
C/O J C PONDER 4 S CAAAWA
3710 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
I(1
{(/
9952.0001-0060
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
IT 6 BK 1
PONDER CLARK ET UX MARGAR
PONDER
1121 MATTESON
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
4952=UllRLDDIP�f0¢K1'OtlN
HElI'HTc
�* ] eR I
�%
311f "•
CO#pvr�
=--2n
9953.0001
0070
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT ] BK 1
GARZA GFONUE JR
])26 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78416
9953-0001-0080
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT B BK 3
SMITH TED R ET U%
MELINDA L SMITH
3730 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 79418
9953-0001-0090
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LTS 9 1 10 SK
GARMON PERRY W ET U%
MARILYN K
3802 MATTESON
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78410
9952-0001-0090
1
GIRMON PERRY W ET U%
MARILYN K
3802 MATTESON
CORPUS CHRISTI
TH 79411„r
9951-0001-0130
YORKTUNN
HEIGHTS
LTS 11, 11 1
NESS MICHAEL LYNN AND FE
HESS WFE
3810 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78419
-9A52 0001"0120
13 BK I
HESS MICHAEL LYNN AND FE
HESS WFE
3810 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 79418
9953-0001-0140
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 14 BK 1
HESS MICHAEL LYNN AND FE
HESS WFE
3810 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
9952-0001-0150
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 15 BK 1
NESS MICHAEL LYNN AND FE
HESS WFE
3810 MATTESON STREET
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
9952"0001
0160
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 16 BK 1
WEST JAMES D AND
ROSARIA 0000
5901 O'BRIAN
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 7N13
9%1-00010160
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 16 BE 1
BAYARDO RODOLFO
'3826 MATTESON STREES"
CORPUS CHRISTI
TlL3Y11B
✓�"" —"
9952"0001-0170
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 17 BK 1
BEAUREGARO ROBERT L AND
CHERYL BEAUREGARO WFE
14049 SOUTH PADRE ISLAND
CORPUS CHRISTI
TK ]8418'
9952"0001-0180
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 18 BK 1
BEAUHEGARD ROBERT L AND
CHERYL BEAUREGARD WFE
14049 SOUTH PADRE ISLAND
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78418
1_Q ----"9952-0001-0190
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 19 BK 1
FERGUSON JACK C ET 13%
EDITH P
1843 MATT650N
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78118
L �f-- --
9953-0001-0200
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 30 SK 1
FERGUSON JACK C 6T U%
3842 HATTESON
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 7B416
9953 0003-DOIO
YORKTOWN
HEIGHTS
LT 1 BK 2
ROCHELLE 1 PATRICK
KOURY
3701 MATTESON
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 78419
QUERY: PLANNING/L%3REP0RT
G5/08/01 15.36,10
PAGE 1
LK LABELS PROPERTY OWNER REPORT
CASE"
TAX ID LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OWNER
ADDRESS 1
ML.701I9
WHLI68
TR 76039
CERPUa-GNt98TI
20501-02 "
9952-0002-0020 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LT 2 BK 1
GERSTENBERGER RICHARD NAY
3705 MATTES0N STREET
SY 41EU4.
T1t758i1..
995]-000].0020 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LTYRR 2
GERSTENBERGER RICHARD NAY
3705 MATTESON EVERY
3 ?_
1952-0002-0030 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LT 3 BE 2
WHITE JOHN M JR
501 TARRAGON LN
TY"iAMl."
9951--BNR�003D-Y8R1C1'Ob'!.-Ho�rum�,3,T • or 2
SRYOY.N-E
1518 DOVB-1JJ1E
—
^`}y9aR-ae18••Y0PKR'0111f•116S0NTLee
a d 1
3713 MATTRSON STREET,..
TR 78118
4951.0002-004R-YORKTOXH-HEIGHTS LTi BK 2
-SECRETARY OF HOUSING MBA
C/PAST. RRESTRN SPECIALI§
TX 78118
994YA888-AR9 D 2
MuNTRYWIDE HONEYAARt IN
� DR
32 ��
9952-000200{0 YORKTOVN HEIGHTS LT 1 BK 2
NPIEL DEBRA AND
RICHARD NRIEL
TR 7A''
9952-0002-0050 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LT 5 BK 2
KELLY MAYNE M
3717 MATTESON ST
9952-000]-0060 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LT 6 BK ]
KELLY MAYNE M
3717 MATTESON ST
9S52c R001.O06"Y0RKTOM HEIGHTS IT 6 BE ]
KELLY-WAYNR M
3,17 NATTR60mA
9952-0002-0070 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS IT 7 BK 2
BRONSON CATHY A
3725 MATTESON STREET
99
ON
99520002-0080 YORKTOWN HEIGHTSy7 8 BK 2
HAWKINS-]OWN T
3729 HATTLESON STREET
-y,�—
9952-0002-0090 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LT 9 BE 2
HOYT GARY DEE ET U% WHIT
J HOYT
9952-0002-0110 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LTS 10 6 11
B ROBERTSON GARY M AND
CAROLYN ROBERTSON MPR
11
/ 1
9RSa_OQ02-0110 K 2
PO6ERT504 GARY Y AND
CA40LYN ROBERTSON WPE
�P—
9952-0002-0120 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LTS 12 THPU 1 CLAWSON PATRICIA G
3613 MATTESON
9952-0002-0120 1 ELK 2
CLAWSON PATRICIA G
3813 MATTESON
9952-0002-0120 YORMI'OWN YIRTGHT9-tTrTrVM
1 CLAWSON PATRICIA G
3BfTY8RTrv"
9952-0002-0120 1 ELK 2
TLAXSON PATRICIA G
1413 "TrziuN
99 HBt� 'TS LT9 15
B.SRYI4Y6-WIMMLC1LJi_
SBT3'"PTrSSON—
Pypp.,
RREBDR4 aTAM.EY'R
31W5-MAYIESOH
9951-800].0156.Y0BHEIGHTE LTS �3.L.L-iFA-PAV0B9T�iI1LL3AM L
3214-AYRRS
QUERY, PLANNING/M3RRMRT
ADDRESS 2
2910 S PADRI ISLAND DR
12UG IN00OU'RGAD-SUITI 1
-PTX-B-R!
202 CR 575.
.1001 ATONE- ST
3733 NATTESOM STREET
3B05 MATTESON STREET
3805 "WINO! SWEET
3813 MATTESON
3813 MATTESON
PAGE 1
CITY
BY ZIP
CORNUS CI Ani
TY 7841E
dDRPUS MRIRTI
ML.701I9
WHLI68
TR 76039
CERPUa-GNt98TI
M 7#418
CORNUS CHRISTI
..
TR 78116
9ALLA9"
SY 41EU4.
T1t758i1..
yiMp-•
CASTROVILLE
TK 78009
CORPUS CHRISTI
TR 78918
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX 78118
CORPUS CHRISTI
TY"iAMl."
CORPUS CHRISTI
TY 78618
RS0iR118
97z7s
C,,M
CORPUS CHRISTI
— yl3
TX 78618
CORNUS CHRISTI
TR 78618
CORPUS CHRISTI
TR 78118
CORPUS 'CHRISTI
W-21118
CORMS CHRISTI
TX 78118
CORMS CHRISTI
TR 78118
CORSWB-L'NBISTI
DIA81T8
roRMB�CMRTSTY"�
TR ANAL
C rU8 CHRISTI`
TR 7A''
CaRT0RlRR l
roESYD-OIIRta4i
7V %It
SUPERINTENDENT MARIA RODRIGUEZ
FLOUR BLUFF I.S.D. NAS
2505 WALDRON ROAD 78418 FAX ONLY 11961-3373
FLOUR BLUFF BUSINESS ASSN.
P. 0. BOX 181423 78418
COMMANDING OFFICER
CODE 183
NAVAL AIR STATION CORPUS CHRISTI
11001 D STREET, STF. 143 78419-5024 QUERY. PLANNING/LX3REPORT
fy
LK LABELS
PROPERTY OMNER REPORT
PAGE 5
05/08/01 15:3640
CAREN
TM ID LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ER
DI
ADDRESS ]
CITY
ST IIP
FAUCETT WILLIAM L
2214AYERS
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 70414
20501.02`
9952 0002-0150 K 3
•T
9952-0002-0170 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LTS 17 0
10 B GREENNALT JESSE J BE
3833 MATTESON
CORPUS CHRISTI
TY 78418
(�
995AO0BJ�i0-Y-1.
GREENWALT JESSE J SR
3833 MATTESON
COPFILS�l
g'LIWI-.
9952-0002-0190 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS LTS 19 1
20 B LADNER BOBBYE L
3509 BOBOLINK LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI
TK 70415
LADNER BOBBYE L
3509 BOBOLINK LANE
l
196•-00415
9952-000T•0890 X 2
LT
1-A LEMMONS PAUL A
LINDA L
13054 HALYARD DR
CORPUS CHRISTI
T% 79418
9957-0000-0015 YORKTUWN HEIGHTS ANNEX
13854 HALYARD DR
QJRMU-CINKISTI
TM�Y818i
995Y'0000--001 ]'•tORKTYlYQ1 ,AElGNT.�A'^IR%T
I A LEMMONS PAUL A
NRPGS"twRtS1T�
TX
LYEI
fp0.01DRNlpMi-CLW
IO ��
l Ll•_--.
9957 0000-0050 YORKTOWN HEIGHTS ANNEX LT
NN
5 RAZ SYLVIA DEE ACOPFMA
500 YORKTOWN
CORPUS CHRISTI.
TK 704.41
WERNER RM AND NANCY FAMI
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
3803 WALDRON RD
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX 79418
C
9962.0000-0010 YORKMAIA ACRES LT 1
LT 9
CHURCH OF CHRIST FLOUR
BLUFF CH OF CHRIST
5341 S STAPLES
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX 78411
9962-0000.0090 YORKMALD ACRES
OF CHRIST FLOUR
BLUFF CH OF CHRIST
5341 S STAPLES
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX 78411
1., _..,..
99620000-0100 YORKMALD ACRES LT 10
CHURCH
SANDRA E
3821 WALDRON ROAD
3821 WALDRON RD
CORPUS CHRISTI
TX 78418
9962-0000-0130 YORKWALD ACRES LT 13
HARDING
L
JB II-liALT)N/1N"RD
COR}IMB{A1RiI
416
i )B
9%]-0000-0130 YORKMALO acgF,i LT. 1•3
WARDING 'SANDRA E
COUNT 110
-�
•• E N D O F
R E P O R T •••
SUPERINTENDENT MARIA RODRIGUEZ
FLOUR BLUFF I.S.D. NAS
2505 WALDRON ROAD 78418 FAX ONLY 11961-3373
FLOUR BLUFF BUSINESS ASSN.
P. 0. BOX 181423 78418
COMMANDING OFFICER
CODE 183
NAVAL AIR STATION CORPUS CHRISTI
11001 D STREET, STF. 143 78419-5024 QUERY. PLANNING/LX3REPORT
fy
8.H.
YOIIKTOWN iLVO.
FLOUR BLUFF AREA MAP
POINT8 OF REFERENCE lEGEND
HIGH BCHOOL
] MIDDLE ECHOOL
m
ELEMENTARY ECHOOL
OTHER
HO8PITAL
COMMUNITY PARK
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
o
OUTEIDE CITY LIMITE
AREA DEVELOPMENT
PLAN (ADP) BOUNDARY
CITY LIMIT LINE
SITE
KINe RANCH
FbANN4#(I OIEpT.
ZONING CASE NO. Z0501-02
APPLICANT: DUNHILL ENTERPRISES, LLC /~/
planninE Co~,,,~sion ~
May 23, 2001
Case No. 0501-02 (Dnnhill Enterprises, L.L.C.)
Page 2
Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Salazar, to approve Staff's recommendation. Motion passed with
Richter voting Nay and Mints and Zamora being absent.
Minority Opinion: Commissioner Richter said that she supports the residential development, but does not
agree with downzoning.
/7
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
AN ORDINANCE
PLANNING COMMISSION
AND STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY
DUNHILL ENTERPRISES, L. L. C., BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP
IN REFERENCE TO LOT 15, SECTION 52, FLOUR BLUFF AND
ENClNAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, FROM "A-I" APARTMENT
HOUSE DISTRICT TO "R-lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT;
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY
DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE- PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of Dunhill Enterprises for amendment to
the zoning ordinance and zoning map of the City of Corpus Christi;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
May 23, 2001, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 19,
2001, dudng a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the
City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and
be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by changing the zoning of Lot 15, Section 52, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm
and Garden Tracts, located on the north side of Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 650
feet east of Waldron Road, from "A-1" Apartment House Distdct to "R-1 B" One-family
Dwelling District.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th clay of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
\\LEGAL\LAV~ALEG-
DIR~DOYLEDCURTISW~YDOCS~00 I\P&ZORD01~.ONING.ORD\DOYLEC~2001~Z050102A.DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Chdsti as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Chdsti.
SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council ('1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 19th day of June, 2001.
A'I'rEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Chdsti
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM June 13, 2001
James R. Bray, Jr.
Doyle ~is -
Senior Assistant Ci~ Afforney
\~EGAL~LAVV~LEG-
OIR~DOYLEDCURTIS~VlYDOCS~200 I\P&ZORD01~ZONING,ORD\DOYLEC~001~.050102A.DOC
10
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRESENTATION
June 14,2001
AGENDA ITEM: Mayor's Planning Committee -4th of July-Big Bang Celebration
OUTSIDE PRESENTERS:
Name
1. Sharon Emerson
2. Mike Lind
3. Vic Menard
(See attached list)
Title/Position
Co-Chairman
Co-Chairman
Co-Chairman
Organization
Bayfest Inc.
Bayfest, Inc.
Big Bang Celebration
ISSUE: Annual presentation by the Mayor's Planning Committee - 4th of July Big
Bang Celebration on events scheduled for Wednesday, July 4, 2001.
BACKGROUND: For the third year, the Mayor's Planning Committee for the Big Bang
Celebration is chaired by community volunteers. Sharon Emerson, Mike Lind and Vic
Menard share the responsibility of general chairpersons for this committee. The Staff
Liaison is Diana Zertuche Garza, Assistant to the Mayor. The planning committee can
utilize the resoumeful membership and empower community volunteers with its leadership.
For the last 14 years, the City of Corpus Christi through the Office of the Mayor, has
provided the following July 4th events free for the general public: The patriotic parade, the
Veteran's patriotic ceremony, and the fireworks display.
Through 1998, the parade had been coordinated by the Park & Recreation staff and by a
variety of civic organizations. In 1999, the Buccaneer Commission agreed to coordinate
and produce the parade; they have also agreed to provide this service for the Year 2001.
The Patriotic Ceremony is coordinated and produced by the Corpus Christi Mayor's
Committee on Veteran's Affairs and the Corpus Christi Veteran's Band. The ceremony has
traditionally been held in Sherrill Park. For the third year, the ceremony will be held inside
the Memorial Coliseum. The City of Corpus Christi will provide the facility for the
ceremony, the logistic support for the set up and take down of the staging and sound
equipment by Park and Recreation, assistance with trash receptacles by Park crews,
police traffic control, police security, and insurance.
The Fireworks Display has been provided in partnership with the HEB Grocery Company
for the past 13 years and for the 14th year, HEB will provide the sponsorship for this great
event.
Cole Park has been reserved by the Mayor's Office for this celebration. Some of the
concerns in the past have included the problems of having events which begin eady in the
afternoon and do not end until after the fireworks. This has posed many problems for our
residents who live in this area and which we hope to curve this problem by having the U.
S. AIR FORCE "BAND OF THE WEST" perform before the fireworks. This sponsorship
would include insurance, Park and Recreation support for the park grounds including trash
receptacles, Police traffic control, street closure, and Police security.
The City also provides general Police traffic control and safety in and around the Shoreline
and Corpus Christi Beach areas. Solid Waste Services provides assistance with
additional receptacles and brush trucks for pick up. Last year, Communications/Quality
Management provided assistance with promotions and related public relations at the local,
state and nation levels (we ask for their support again). Street Services provides
assistance with traffic plans and street closures.
The remaining events listed are sponsored and hosted independently, but under the
umbrella of the Mayor's Planning Committee to be included as a part of the City of Corpus
Christi "Big Bang Celebration". The Mayor's Planning Committee has served as a
resourceful pool of talent, creativity, networking and cooperation. The committee was
developed in an effort to better coordinate these various independent and city events in
regards to scheduling, sponsorship and shared marketing. The committee has been
successful in accomplishing its goals to date.
July 4th in Corpus Christi on Shoreline Boulevard is a phenomenal experience. Much like
the Buccaneer Days, it is a cultural, leisure and patriotic event with families and visitors
alike. The spectators and participants are camped out on Shoreline Blvd. medians, along
the seawall, on the Marina T-heads, grid-locked in cars stopping for the fireworks from
Swanter Park on north Ocean Drive, on the Harbor Bridge and into Portland. This
celebration in Corpus Christi continues to have huge potential as a banner celebration in
Texas and the United States.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
only and no action is required.
This presentation is for informational purposes
Diana Zertuche/J~arza
Management Assistant to the Mayor
Attached Schedule of Events
Attached Committee List
Corpus ¢&rlsti, Texas
JUL Y 4TH- BI6 BANG CELEBRATION
2001 CALENDAR OF SPECIAL EVENTS
WEDNESDAY, JUL Y 4, 2001
7:00 a.m.
Heritage Park
4 FOR THE 4TH
Bayfront Run by Corpus Christi RoadRunners
Pick up applications at Roger Soler's Sports, 5854 S.
Staples St. or at Heritage Park before the race begins
4:15 p.m.
Bayfront/Marina
U.S. COAST GUARD SEARCH & RESCUE
(Free to the Public)
4:30 p.m.
Start North of 1-37
4TH OF JULY STARS & STRIPES PARADE
By the Buccaneer Commission, Inc. & Bucarader Assn,
Sponsored by the Mayor's July 4th Committee
(Free to the Public)
6:00-7:00 p.m.
Memorial Coliseum
INDEPENDENCE DAY PATRIOTIC CEREMONY
By the Coropus Christi Mayor's Committee for Veteran's
Affairs & the Corpus Christi Veteran's Band
(Free to the Public)
7:00-9:00 p.m.
Cole Park
U. S. AIR FORCE "BAND OF THE WEST" - Top Flight -
Music Combo (Free Concert Sponsored by the
Buccaneer Commission)
7:00 p.m.
CC Beach
USTARS & STRIPES ABOARD THE USS LEXINGTON"
By the U.S.S. Lexington, Corpus Christi Symphony
7:00 p.m.
CC Beach
TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM - PICNIC
Friends of the Aquarium (members & their guests)
9:40 p.m.
Downtown Bayfront
14th ANNUAL H-E-B INDEPENDENCE DA Y
FIREWORKS DISPLAY over the Downtown Bayfront
(Free to the Public)
July 4th Committee
Number of contacts: 30
Company
1440 KEYS/KZFM
1440 KEYS/KZFM
Bayfest, Inc.
Big Bang Celebration
Buccaneer Commission
Buccaneer Commission
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
City of Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce
Corpus Christi CVB
Corpus Christi Road Runners
Downtown Management District
H.E.B.
Contact
John Gifford
Bob Ocanas
Mike Lind
Vic Menard
Vicky Lewis
Joe Ochoa
Chds Barnes
Peter Davidson
Diana Zertuche Garza
Rene Garza
Walter Jarrin
David Ondrias
Gene Perkins
David Seiler
Capt. Wayne Tisdale
Melissa Longoria
Kirn Lemley
Doug McBee
Norma Urban
Debbie Lindsey-Opel
Diana Zertuche Garz& City of Corpus Christi
P. O. Box 9277
Corpus Christ[ Texas 78469-9277
Created 6/15/2001 at 9:11 AM I
July 4th Committee
Kleberg Law Firm. The
KRIS Communications
Mayor's Committee on Veteran's Affairs
Old Country Buffet
R. T. A.
R. T. A.
Texas State Aquarium
U. S. S. Lexington
Valero Refining Company
Veteran's Band
Sharon Emerson
Jay A. Sanchez
Al Cantu
Gladys Lyles-Yarnell
Vangie Chapa
Julio Wilmot
C~stal Mead
Sandi McNorton
Gwen Henzi
Fred Trejo
Diana Zertuche Garze. City of Corpus Christi
P. O. Box 9277
Corpus Christ[ Texas 78469-9277
Created 6/15/2001 at 9:11 AM 2
11
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: June 1, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution approving the FY 2001/02 budget for the Corpus Christi Crime
Control and Prevention District.
ISSUE:. Provisions of the Local Government Code section 363.204 require that the governing body
of the political subdivision that created the Crime Control and Prevention District shall hold a public
heating on the proposed annual budget to receive public comment and approve or reject the budget
submitted by the Board of Directors of the Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The voters on November 4, 1997 established the Crime
Control and Prevention District for 5 years beginning April 1, 1998. This approved a 1/8*-cent sales
tax to fund the District and provide additional funds to enhance law enforcement efforts in the City of
Corpus Christi.
A public heating was held by the Crime Comrol and Prevention District on April 18, 2001 and by the
City Council on May 29, 2001 in accordance with notice and all other procedures required by law.
The Board adopted amendments to the budget proposed by Managemem and Budget on June 13,
2001. The budget must now be submitted to the City Council for approval.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the FY 2001/02 budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends approval of the budget.
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
FY 2001/02 budget
RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE FY 2001-2002 BUDGET FOR THE CORPUS CHRISTI
CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, on November 4, 1997, the Citizens of Corpus Christi voted to approve the
Crime Control and Prevention District;
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2001, the Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District
Board held a public hearing on the FY 01-02 Crime Control and Prevention District budget and after
said public hearing, the Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District Board adopted the
budget; and
WHEREAS, on May 29, 2001, the City Council ofthe City of Corpus Christi held a public
hearing on the FY01-02 Crime Control and Prevention District budget submitted by the Corpus
Christi Crime Control and Prevention District Board.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the FY 2001-2002 Corpus Christi Crime
Control and Prevention District budget as submitted by the Corpus Christi Crime Control and
Prevention District Board, a copy of which is attached hereto as an Exhibit to this Resolution and
incorporated herein.
ATTEST:
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor
The City of Corpus Christi
Legal form approved
,2001; James R. Bray, Jr., City Attorney
By: ~.~
~,~ ~a/g~ilar/Assistant City A ttomey
H:\LEG-DIR' VERONICA~JAYSAVE\KES.053
2nn102.xis Pane 1
Crime Control & Prevention District
Preliminary Budget
II
6/15/01 9:21 Aro[
FY -2001-02 I
40 Officers I.
Plan
Annualized
Yr 6 111
Adjustment
Yr 6 - Adjusted Adjustments
YR 6 - Balanced
Actual
Estimated 11,
Proposed 11
Forecast
Total
Forecast i
Forecast 1!
10 Officers I.I
Forecast
Other
Forecast
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
5 Yr Plan
2002-03
2003-04 1
4 Civilians
2003-04
2003-04
8 Months
Beginning Balance
Revenues:
Sales Tax
$2,567,429
3,432,619.
$ 3,276,139
3,499,567
$ 3,174,079
3,604,545
$2,268,382
2,475,121
$ 802,965
16,310,530
$ 2,260,382 ! $ 1,614,312
3,712,681 3,824,062
$ 1,614,312��
3,824.062 s
$ 1,614,312
3,824,062
Interest Earnings
Net Inc./Dec. in FV of Investm
217,473
4,688
162,200
103,900
90,735
657,077
90,735
64,572
64,572
64,572
Total Current Revenues
3,654,780
3,661,767
3,708,445
2,565,856
16,967,607
3,803,417
3,888,634
3,888,634 I
3,888,634
Total Funds Available 1
6,222,209
6,937,906
6,882,524
4,834,238
17,770,572
6,071,799
5,502,946
5,502,946 I'i
5,502,946
Expenditures:
Police Officer Costs
867,369 lI
21241,887
2,818,881
2,180,305
8,346,810
3,270,293 13,550,684
(178,211)
3,372,473
(552,496)1
2,819,977
Police Academy Costs
Support Personnel
Juvenile Assessment Center
I
455,704
367,181
-
576,169
436,966
161,177 !
487,000
379,270
50,960
321,962
254,092
2,152,781
1,437,508
482,919
381,118
667,256
416,541
(199.978)
(102,269);
'1l
564,987 `
416,541
(155,943)
-
409,044
416.541
Pawn Shop Detail
Legal Advisor
MDT/AVL Technical Support
71,311
I
53,276
137,762.1
86,731
190,914
106,834
85,432 1
59,579
114,388
57,024 1 349,011
39,721 374,655
70,741 496,183
85,531
62,518
i
106,107
95,665
67,870
114,331
I
95,665
67,870
114,331
(40,603)I
-
-
55,062
67,870
111 114,331
School / Police Partnership
165,933
19,061
-
-
313,061
Special Traffic Enforcement-
(OtficerOvenime)
80,000
-
-
-
91,886
-
-
-
Bi -Annual District Evaluation
6,000
-
-
-
6,000
6,000
-
6,000
Citizen Advisory Councils
Street Lighting
Public Safety Vehicles &
Equipment275,686
Crime Control Election Costs
10,000
25,000
6,000
5,000 j
94,265
50,000 33,335
25,000 -
i
12,667
100,000
99,335
55,000
1,351,383
50,000
-
19,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8,500
Reserve for Salary Adjustment
I
47,615
I
Total Expenditures
2,946,070
3,763,827
11 4,614,142
3,020,807
15,067,614
4,457,487
4,918,347
! (480,459)
4,637,866
(749,041)1
3,897,325
Ending Balance
3,276,139
3,174,079
2,268,382
1,813,432
2,702,958
1,614,312
584,599
865,079
1 1,605,621
Surplus/(Deficit)
708,710
(102,060).
(905,696)
(454,951)
1,899,993
(654,071)1,029,713
749,232
(8,691)
I
2nn102.xis Pane 1
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Additional Police Officers
1
Ftes
I Estimated 1
Res
Proposed
Figs
Forecast
00-01
2000-01 01-02
2001-02
02-031
2002-03
Salaries & Retirement
40
1,759,286 1 50
1,994,615
50
2,521,353
Overtime Salary & Retirement
159,319
166,616
153,990
3% COLA
56,109
71,119
Insurance
276,214
320,270
326,942
Clothing
Minor Equipment
Fuel & Maintenance
19,000
4,500
31,000
30,791 11126,061
6,000
118,282
37,830
132,999
Vehicles
118,956
Operational Costs
7,242 1
Reimbursements
7,4321
-
Costs For Additional Officers
40
2,241,887 50
.2,818,881
50
3,270,293
Schedule Of Officer Additions:
Continue Funding Existing uHP (COPS Ahead
Officers(
10
1
Additional Officers -July 1999
5
i
Additional Officers - February 2000
15
Additional Officers -July 2000
10
Additional Officers - April 2002
10
Total Officers
50
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Police Academy Costs
Estimated Ftes
Proposed
Ftes Forecast
111 2000-01 1 101-02
2001-02
02-03. 2002-03
Salaries & Retirement
10
113,400
10 56,700
Overtime Salary & Retirement
9,176
4,588
3% COLA
31402
1,803
Insurance
26,689
13,345
Clothing
570
Minor Equipment
1,890
Professional Services
3,750
Training Aids
-
2,300
-
Fuel& Maintenance
Vehicle Costs
I
Costs For Additional Officers
- 10
161,177
76,436
I
Schedule Of Officer Additions:
Continue Funding Existing UHP (COPS Ahead
Officers)
10
Additional Officers - July 1999
5
Additional Officers - February 2000
15
Additional Officers -July 2000
10
Additional officers -April, 2002
10
Total Officers
50
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Support Personnel
Res
Estimated
Res
Proposed
Res
Forecast
00-01
2000-01
01-02
2001-02
02-03
2002-03
Salaries & Retirement for following:
407,105
Public Safety Dispatchers
Crime Scene Technician 1
Office Assistant 11
Office Assistant 111
10
4
2
2
8
2
2
2
219,081
47,188 11
43,482
42,600
8
1 2 1147,188
2
2
219,081
43,482
42,600
Systems Coordinator
Police System CoordinatorlCAD
1
0
0
1
-
39,629
0
1
36,027
Vacancy Savings
Overtime Costs
41,486
(26,141)
11,194
(26,141)
11,754
insurance
Operational Costs
127,578
-
100,882
9,086
i
100,882
8,047
Costs For Support Personnel
19
576,169
15
487,000
15
482,919
Estimates includes costs for 17 FTES
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Juvenile
Assessment Center
Re
Estimated
Fte
Proposed0O2E-!0023
00-Ot
2000-01
01-02
2001-02
t2
Salaries & Retirement for:
168,41Program
Director
1
1
39,484
Case Managers
4
-
2
63,985
2
63,985
Counselors
3
-
2.5
70,846
2.5
70,846
Office Assistant 11
1
-
1
19,521
1
19,521
Juvenile Processing Officer
0
3
89,255
3
89,255
Vacancy Savings
-
(7,077)
(7,077)
Police Officer Overtime Pay
(Intake)
141,201
-
-
Overtime/Civilian
-
2,371
Insurance
58,793
45,432
45,432
Operational Costs
23,003
10,980
15,200
Equipment Costs
1,000
-
Building Rental
44,556
44,472
44,472
Costs For Assessment Center
9
436,966
1 9.5
379,270
9.5
381,118
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Pawn Shop Detail
I
Fte
Estimated Fte
Proposed:Fte
Forecast00-01
2000-01 01-02
2001-02
2002-03
Salaries & Retirement:
Office Assistant II
3
66,452 3
66,203
3
66,203
Vacancy Savings
Overtime Costs
100
11990
2,089
Insurance
20,179
1 17,239
17,239
Operational Costs
Equipment Costs
Costs For Pawn Shop Detail
3
86,731 3
85,432
3 !
85,531
i
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Legal Advisor
Ftes
Estimated FtesqT
Proposed
Res Forecast
00-01
2000-01 2.lan2
2002-03
Attorney 11
1
55,125 17
1 54,957
Insurance
6,726
4,621
4,621
Operational costs
211
Encumbrance/FY-99100
128,852
Cost for Legal Advisor
1
190,914 1
59,579
1 59,579
'
I
168
2,105
211
2,484
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
MDT/AVL Technical Support
Fte
Estimated
Fte
Proposed
i Fte
Forecast
00101
2000-01
01/02
2001-02
02/03
2002-03
Salaries & Retirement:
90,439
Computer Operator III
1
0
-
0
-
Systems Analyst
1
0
0
Police Computer Opr.
0
1
47,503
1
43,184
Police System Analyst
1 0
1
51,372
1
46,702
II
Overtime Costs
2,942
4,162
4,370
Insurance
13,453
11,351
11,351
Operational Costs
500
Equipment
Expansion Of MDT / AVL -I
Investigative Staff
i
Costs For MDT/AVL
2
106,834
2
114,388
2
106,107
i
I
I
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
School/ Police Partnership
Estimated Proposed Forecast
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
CCISD
Flour Bluff
West Oso 19,061 - -
Tuloso Midway - - -
Calallen - -
Costs For School I
Police Partnership 19,061
I
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Citizen Advisory Councils
Estimated Proposed
Forecast
2000-07 2001-02
2002-03
Operational Costs 6,000 50,000
50,000
Costs For Citizen
Advisory Councils 6,000 50,000
50,000
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
Crime Control & Prevention District
Public Safety Vehicles & Equipment
Estimated ! Proposed
Forecast
2000-01 2001-02
2002-03
Addt'i Prisoner Transport Vehicle
3-Addt'I Marked Vehicles for DPO
99,000
5 - Addt'I Marked Vehicles
7 - Addt'I Marked Vehicles
16 - Marked Vehicles - Repl.
10 -Unmarked Vehicles - Repl.
1 - Crime Scene Van - Repi.
4 - Addt'I Crime Scene Van
4,800
1 - Van for Canine Division
1 -Community Policing Van
! 75,000
Upgrade existing Dare Units
88,000
Video Imaging System & Maint
94,265 19,000
19,000
3 - Motor Scooters
Costs Vehicles & Equipment
94,265 285,800
19,000
10
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
11
6/15/2001
9:22 AM
47
12
12
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRESENTATION
AGENDA ITEMS:
· Overview of Proposed FY 01-02 Enterprise Fund Budgets
· Options for development of third municipal golf course
· Overview of Police Department expenditures and budget
CITY STAFF PRESENTER(S):
Name Title
Mark L. McDaniel Director of Management and Budget
Tony Cisneros Director of Parks and Recreation
Pete Alvarez Police Chief
June 14, 2001
ISSUE: The City Council is called upon to adopt the FY 01-02 Budget prior to
August 1, 2001. As part of the Council's review of the proposed budget, several
presentations have been scheduled. This is the third in a series of presentations
that will focus on the City's Enterprise Funds.
Follow-up presentations on options for a third municipal golf course and Police
Department budget/expenditures are scheduled as part of this presentation as well.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: No formal action is required at this time.
The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the Proposed Budget on June
26~. Adoption of the proposed FY 01-02 Budget is scheduled for July 10th & 17th .
Mark L. M~D~niel
Director of Management and Budget
Copy of Enterprise Fund Presentation X
Copy of Golf Course Presentation (will be faxed separately)
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
FY 2001-2002
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Page 163
Water
Wastewater
Gas
Airport
Ambulance
Marina
Golf
2
Page 165
• RE-ENGINEERING EFFORTS IN THE
WATER AND WASTEWATER
DEPARTMENT HAVE RESULTED IN
THE FOLLOWING:
— Total personnel services expenditures are
programmed to increase by only $49,082
(including salaries/wages, overtime,
retirement and group health)
3
Elimination of 42 positions
• (Water- 24, Wastewater -18)
— Annualized
expenditure
savings of
$927,800
— Salaries are
budgeted @
98% level
- valued
at $363,436 less
— Only one new position added
• (Water Resource Planner)
11
UTILITY OPERATIONS RE-ENGINEERING
(Reductions in Force for Vacant Positions)
70
60.5 OVER 2 YEARS
60
50
40
30
20
FL I'
AMM
50 OVER 2 YEARS
WASTEWATER
1001-021 24 18
IM00-011 36.5 32
s
•
$3.9 million increase in Debt Service for
utility projects
• A total of $12 million of the unreserved
fund balance will be used for "pay-as-you-
go" financing of currently approved
capital projects (per second year of five
year CIP)
• Proposed 2% rate increase for all utilities
on
0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0
History of Utility Rate Increases
6.0%
7
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
94-95
95-96
96-97
98-99
99-00
00-01
01-02
■ WATER
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
0.0%
2.0%
■ WASTEWATER
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
0.0%
2.0%
■ GAS
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
7
Residential Monthly Bill Current Proposed Increase
Water (7,000 gallons*) $14.74
Raw Water 4.59
Wastewater (7,000 gallons*) 24.02
Gas (3/mcf*) 14.75
Purchase Gas Adj. 18.24
Total/Month $76.34
*Community average
0
$15.02 $ .28
4.59 --
24.50 $ .48
15.04 $ .29
18.24 --
$77.39 $1.05
g
• Utility System Rate model prepared by
DMG Maximus confirms the need for a
minimum 6% annual rate increase in
future years to support existing CIP
IOU
P
• WATER FUND (Page 167)
• Total Expenditures of $70,387,235 including
$5,000,000 for pay-as-you-go CIP
2% Rate Increase for Cost of Service will generate
an additional $700,000 to support capital projects
• $1.5 million in funding for Water Supply
Development including addition of Water
Resources Planner and studies/professional
services for possible desalination and Garwood
Pipeline projects
• Elimination of 24 positions for FY 01-02
10
0
0
.
.
0 0
• GAS FUND (Page 187)
• Total Expenditures of $42,970,246 including
$2,000,000 for pay-as-you-go CIP
• 2% Rate Increase for Cost of Service will generate
an additional $275,000 to support capital projects
• Price of natural gas is projected at $6.94/mcf
(versus prior year adopted budget of $3.42/mcf)
I I
• WASTEWATER FUND (Page 195)
• Total Expenditures of $33,238,974 including
$5,000,000 for pay-as-you-go CIP
• 2% Rate Increase for Cost of Service will generate
an additional $593,000 to support capital projects
• Elimination of 18 additional positions for
FY 01-02
12
• AIRPORT FUND (Page 203)
• Total Revenue of $6,271,809
• Total Expenditures of $6,377,761
• Expenditure increase of $365,854 due primarily
to significant increase in power costs.
• Revenues are projected to increase due to new oil
and gas leases and property rentals.
• Other revenue should increase upon completion of
new terminal in the Spring 2002
•
13
• AMBULANCE FUND (Page 211)
• Overview covered during General Fund
Presentation
14
• MARINA FUND (Page 223)
• Total Revenue of $1,088,458
• Total Expenditures of $1,091,170
• Increase in Bayfront Revenues due to projected
impact of the opening of new restaurant in
Marina, June 2001 (1.5% of gross receipts)
• Slip Rental rates increase of 5% will generate
additional revenue of $34,520
15
• GOLF CENTERS FUND (Page 219)
• Total Revenue of $2,342,746
• Total Expenditures of $2,340,950
• Revenue stream has decreased by 13% due
primarily to fewer rounds being played
• Proposed surcharge increase of $2.00/round and
$1.50 for cart rental.
• Purchase of turf maintenance equipment -
$141,000 (average age of equipment is 5 years)
• Projected Surcharge Reserve of $656,042 for
development of third municipal golf course
16
• OPTIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
THIRD GOLF COURSE
• OVERVIEW OF POLICE DEPT.
EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET
• QUESTION/ COMMENTS?
17
"Staying The Course For A Bright Future"
V.
13
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
June 14, 2001
AGENDA ITEM:
Adoption of a resolution establishing a City of Corpus Christi Sesquicentennial
Celebration Advisory Committee to consider and propose activities, events and
promotions to recognize the anniversary of the City.
ISSUE:
The City's 150th anniversary is coming on September 9, 2002. The City Council
has decided to appoint a City of Corpus Christi Sesquicentennial Celebration
Advisory Committee comprised of eighteen members to work on this special
event. Each Council member will be appointing two people to serve on the
Committee. The Mayor will also be designating two members of the City Council
who will serve as ex-officio members of the Committee.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
The City Council shall appoint all members of any City committees, boards or
commissions.
Marco A. Cisneros, Director
Park and Recreation Department
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Background Information
Contract Summary
Ordinance/Resolution
Map(s)
X
RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING A CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI SESQUICENTENNIAL
CELEBRATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER AND PROPOSE
ACTIVITIES, EVENTS, AND PROMOTIONS TO RECOGNIZE THE
ANNIVERSARY OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City Council ackno~vledges that September 9, 2002, xvill mark the 15ffh anni-
versary of the City's incorporation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to recognize and celebrate this historic event.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council establishes the City of Corpus Christi Sesquicentennial
Celebration Advisory Committee ("Committee").
SECTION 2. The Committee shall be comprised of 18 members to be appointed by the City
Council members. Each City Council member shall appoint two persons to serve on the Com-
mittee.
SECTION 3. The Mayor shall designate t;vo members of the City Council who will serve as ex-
officio members of the Committee.
SECTION 4. Each member shall serve from July 1, 2001, until December 31,2002. Upon the
occurrence of any vacancy, it shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner in which
appointments are required to be made.
SECTION 5. The Committee members will serve without compensation.
SECTION 6. The Committee shall, at its first regular meeting, select from among its member-
ship a chairperson and a vice-chairperson, and such other officers as the Committee deems nec-
essary.
SECTION 7. The Committee chairperson, with the approval of the Committee, may establish
such subcommittees as may be needed or appropriate to accomplish the duties of the Committee.
The membership of each said subcommittee shall consist of members of the Committee.
eh/O 1/res/sesqui.wpd
SECTION 8. The Committee shall receive guidance and assistance from the Director of Park
and Recreation.
SECTION 9. The Committee shall advise and make recommendations to the City Council as to
the types and dates of community events and activities to be scheduled to commemorate the ob-
servance of the City's anniversary.
SECTION I0. In performing the duties of the Committee, the Committee should consult with
the Corpus Christi Library Board, the Corpus Christi Museum of Science and History Advisory
Board, the Nueces County Historical Society, the Instituto de Cultura Hispanica, and such other
entities the Committee deems necessary, to consider community exhibits to showcase the anni-
versary.
SECTION 11. The Committee should also consult with the Corpus Christi Convention and
Visitors Bureau, the Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce, the Black Chamber of Commeme,
and the Hispanic Chamber of Commeme to evaluate and coordinate promotional activities asso-
ciated with the City's anniversary.
SECTION 12. The Committee shall coordinate with the sponsors of other community-wide
celebrations, such as Buccaneer Days, Bayfest, the Jazz Festival, Juneteenth, Beach-to-Bay, the
July 4th Big Bang Celehration, Feria De Las Flores, and the Harbor Lights Festival, to promote
the 150th anniversary during year 2002.
SECTION 13. The Committee shall meet at least once each month and shall provide monthly
reports to the City Council.
ATTEST:
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor
City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM THIS
J1MM~q~.,.'BRAY, ,IR., CITy, dkTTQ'KNEY
Assi~a~lt City AttorneY
__DAY OF ,2001.
eh/01/res/sesqui.wpd
Notes and Comments