HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 04/16/2002CITY
COUNCIL
AGENDA
"Corpus Christi Celebrating 150 Years"
APRIL 16, 2002
12:00 p.m. -Joint Meeting between the City Council and the Airport Board regarding the Quarterly Update, Airport
Construction projects and other matters related to the Airport (City Hall Basement Training Room)
1:45 p.m. Certificate of Commendation for David Seiler, Retired Traffic Engineer
Recognition of Terry Lugo, City of Corpus Christi Central Cashiering Supervisor, by the National Guard of the U.S. Reserves for being
an Outstanding Supervisor
Proclamation declaring the month of April, 2002 as "Sexual Assault Prevention Awareness Month"
Proclamation declaring the month of April, 2002 as "SWBYPS Project Redirectory Month'
Proclamation declaring April 20, 2002 as "4'^ Annual Earth Day/Bay Day Celebration'
Proclamation declaring April 21 -27, 2002 as "Council of Hospital Auxiliary Volunteer Week"
Special Presentation by the Friends of the Library of "A Bird's Eye View of Corpus Christi" 15CPAnniversary Project
AGENDA
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1201 LEOPARD
APRIL 16, 2002
1:00 P.M.
PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE
PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 5:30 p.m, or at the end
of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name
and address. Yourpresentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition orotherinformation pertaining to your
subject, please present it to the City Secretary.
Si ud. Desea dirigirse al Concillo y cree qua su ingles as limitado, habr8 un interprete inglds-espanol an todas las juntas del
Concilio para ayudarte.
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to
contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-880-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be
made.
A. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr, to call the meeting to order.
B. Invocation to be given by George Pledger, Weber Road Church of Christ.
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag to the United States.
D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers.
Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Brent Chesney
Council Members:
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Manager David R. Garcia
City Attorney James R. Bray, Jr.
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
E. MINUTES:
Approval of the Joint and Regular Meetings of March 26, 2002
and Special Meeting of April 2, 2002. (Attachment # 1)
F. BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (Attachment # 2)
2. Airport Board
* Sister City Committee
* Transportation Advisory Committee
G. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION:
For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed
as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City
Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may
finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure
rather than a two reading ordinance; or may modify the action specified.
A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the
last regular, or a subsequent special meeting; such agendas are
incorporated herein forreconsideration and action on any reconsidered
item.
H. CONSENT AGENDA
Notice to the Public
The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has
been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it
has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one
vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council
Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be
withdrawn forindividual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not
requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will
be adopted by one vote.
CONSENT MOTIONS RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES
FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
(At this point the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not
removed for individual consideration)
3. Motion approving a supply agreement with Altivia, of Houston,
Texas, for approximately 415 tons of sodium chlorite solution in
accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0065-02 based on low bid
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
for an estimated annual expenditure of $234,060. The term of
the supply agreement will be for twelve months with an option to
extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods subject to
the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his
designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Water Department
in FY2001-2002. (Attachment # 3)
4. Motion approving the purchase of one (1) line jetting truck from
the Houston - Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC),
for the total amount of $79,009.02. The award is based on the
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with HGAC. This vehiclewill
be used by the Wastewater Department. Funds are available
from the FY2001-2002 Capital Outlay Budget. This item will be
an addition to the fleet. (Attachment # 4)
5. Motion approving the purchase of four mowers and one sand trap
rake in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0057-02 from AMC
Industries, of San Antonio, Texas based on low bid for a total of
$109,018.80. All items are replacement units. Funding is
available in the FY2001-2002 Capital Outlay Fund. (Attachment
# 5)
6. Motion approving the purchase of ten (10) sedans from the
Houston - Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC), for
the total amount of $146,781.50. The award is based on the
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with HGAC. These vehicles
will be used by the Police Department. Funds are available
through the Law Enforcement Block Grant. These items are
replacements to the fleet. (Attachment # 6)
7.a. Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 024528 which adopted the
FY2001-2002 budget to authorize purchase of additional fire
trucks through lease purchase program. (Attachment # 7)
7.b. Motion authorizing the lease purchase of two aerial fire trucks
from the Houston -Galveston Area Council of Governments
(HGAC), for the total amount of $1,295,922.82. The award is
based on the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with HGAC.
Funds have been budgeted in the FY2001-2002 Capital Outlay
Budget. These items are replacement upgrades and will be used
by the Fire Department. (Attachment # 7)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 4
8. Motion approving the purchase of one pre -owned crawler tractor
with sideboom in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0067-02
from H & V Equipment Services, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas,
based on low bid, for a total of $135,554. This equipment will be
used by the Gas Department and is an addition to the fleet.
Funding is available from the FY2001-2002 Capital Outlay Fund.
(Attachment # 8)
9. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
a construction contract with King -Isles, Inc. in the amount of
$1,065,630 for the Crosstown/South Padre Island Drive (SPID)
Interchange Waterline Adjustments at Gollihar Road and Johanna
Street. (Attachment # 9 )
10. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
a construction contract with Rycon E & C, LLC in the amount of
$161,435 for the installation of Wastewater Clean -outs. Funds
are available in Capital Improvement Budget FY2001-2002.
(Attachment # 10)
11. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment No. 6 to an engineering services contract with
Govind E.C. in the amount of $99,112 for the Broadway Plant Lift
Station Diversion project. (Attachment # 11)
12. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment No. 2 for Stage 2 services to the engineering
contract with Goldston Engineering, Inc. in the amount of
$249,575 for Laguna Madre Service Area -Collection System
Rehabilitation Project. (Attachment # 12)
13. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment No. 1 to the engineering services contract with
Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, Inc. in the amount of
$299,040 for the Buckingham Estates Lift Station Project.
(Attachment # 13)
14. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
an amendment to an architectural/engineering services contract
with M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. in the amount of
$46,060 for short term parking pedestrian canopies and vehicle
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
inspection stations for the Corpus Christi International Airport
Roadway and Parking Lot Improvements Project. (Attachment #
14)
15. Ordinance abandoning and vacating 1,000 -square feet, of a 10 -
foot wide utility easement out of Lot 11, Block 8, Lantana
Industrial Area; requiring the owner, Turbonetics Engineering and
Services, Inc., to comply with the specified conditions and replat
the property with 180 days at owner's expense. (Attachment #
15)
16. Motion approving the purchase of 77 laptop computers from Dell
Computer Corporation in accordance with the State of Texas
Cooperative Purchasing program for the total amount of
$199,926.65. The equipment is for the Police Department funded
through the COPS MORE grant. (Attachment # 16)
17.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a
grant in the amount of $140,688 in funding from the Executive
Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to
support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal
Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking
Area. (Attachment # 17)
17.b. Ordinance appropriating $140,688 in the No. 1050 Federal/State
Grants Fund from the Executive Office of the President, Office of
National Drug Control Policy to support the Police Department's
role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High
Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. (Attachment # 17)
18.a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to
execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Housing Authority of the
City of Corpus Christi (Authority) for the Corpus Christi Police
Department to provide supplemental police services to the
Authority on a voluntary overtime basis, for a period of twelve
months, and not to exceed $125,176. (Attachment # 18)
18.b. Ordinance appropriating $15,166 from the Housing Authority of
the City of Corpus Christi (Authority) for supplemental police
patrol at the Authority in the No. 1020 General Fund - Police
Department; amending Ordinance No. 024528 which adopted the
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 6
FY2001-2002 Budget by increasing both revenues and
appropriations by $15,166 in the No. 1020 General Fund.
(Attachment # 18 )
19. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to
execute an agreement with Texas A & M University - Corpus
Christi in the amount of $36,320 for professional services to
expand the Police Department's current technology through
enhanced geographical information system/mapping of motor
vehicle thefts. (Attachment # 19)
20. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending the Code of Ordinances,
Chapter 53 - Traffic, Section 53-250 - Schedule I, One -Way
Streets and Alleys, Section (a), by establishing a one-way traffic
pattern on Riverwood Drive in the northbound direction of travel
from F.M. Highway 624 (Northwest Boulevard)to River Hill Drive,
at all times; providing for penalties. (First Reading - 3/26/02)
(Attachment # 20)
21. Second Reading Ordinance - Annexing Padre and Mustang
Island Tracts; annexing 9,618 feet of Padre Island Gulf Beach
Frontage Tracts owned by Jones, Walter & GLO (44.16 acres)
and Padre Balli Park (Nueces County Park No. 1) (194.92 acres
and 6,324 feet of Gulf Beach frontage on Padre Island), in the
vicinity of the Nueces - Kleberg County Line; annexing Packery
Channel Park (Nueces County Park No. 2) and adjoining private
land (approximately 50.01 total acres for park and private land) on
Padre Island; annexing 221 acres of land south of Mustang Island
State Park, comprising 4,211 feet of Gulf Beach frontage on
Mustang Island, owned by Nueces County; annexing 9.23 acres
of land north of Zahn Road and J.P. Luby Surf Park, comprising
2,009.79 feet of Gulf Beach frontage on Mustang Island, owned
by Estate of Eric C. Lower; providing that each annexed tract is
contiguous to the City limits of the City of Corpus Christi;
providing for a service plan for the annexed tracts of land;
providing that the owners and inhabitants are entitled to all rights,
privileges, and burdens of other citizens and property owners of
the City of Corpus Christi and are subject to and bound by the
City Charter, Ordinances, Resolutions, and rules; requiring
application for Certificate of Occupancy for nonconforming use;
providing for amendment of the official maps of the City of Corpus
Christi, providing for an effective date. (Attachment # 21) (First
Reading - 3/26/02)
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
LN .
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 7
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Tract 1: Jones, Walter and GLO Beach Frontages: Publicly
and privately owned lands comprising approximately 44.16 acres
and 9,618 feet of gulf beach frontage, from the south most
property line of Padre Balli County Park to a point 500 feet south
of the south most property line of the Lawrence Jones property.
The width of the strip extends westward from the City Limit Line
on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37 -foot line above
Mean Sea Level based on United States Geological Survey
(U.S.G.S.) and Geodetic Survey (G.S.) datum of 1929, to a point
along the vegetation line approximately 200 feet west of and
generally parallel to the 1.37 -foot line above Mean Sea Level Gulf
of Mexico shoreline.
Tract 2: Padre Balli Park: Nueces County Park No. 1 (Padre
Balli Park) comprising approximately 194.92 acres and 6,324 feet
of gulf beach frontage.
Tract 3: Packery Channel Park: Public and privately owned
lands comprising approximately 50.01 acres and including
Nueces County Park No. 2 (Packery Channel Park).
Tract 4: Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island State
Park: Publicly owned tract of land comprising 221.00 acres and
4,211 feet of gulf beach frontage surrounded by the existing City
Limits and out of the William Bryan Survey 606, between the east
right-of-way line of State Highway 361 and the existing City Limit
line along the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37 -foot line
above Mean Sea Level based on the U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum
of 1929.
Tract 5: Beach Front Property North of Zahn Road:Privately
owned (Eric C. Lower) tract of land comprising approximately 9.23
acres and 2,009.79 feet of gulf beach frontage abutting the City
Limits on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37 -foot line
above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum of
1929 and extending approximately 200 feet westward, and
between County owned land and State leased land at J.P. Luby
Surf Park.
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 8
I. REGULAR AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES:
22.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept
grant funding in the amount of $57,202 from the Texas
Department of Transportation for the Click It or Ticket (CIOT)
Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) for occupant
protection enforcement overtime within the Police Department
and to execute all related documents. (Attachment # 22)
22.b. Ordinance appropriating $57,202 from the Texas Department of
Transportation in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for
funding of the Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Selective Traffic
Enforcement Project (STEP) within the Police Department.
(Attachment # 22)
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
ADJUSTMENTS TO SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS:
23. Public Hearing regarding Proposed Adjustments to the City
Council Single Member District Boundary Lines. (Attachment #
23)
ZONING CASES: (2:00 P.M.)
24. Case No. CO202-01A City of Corpus Christi• Zone newly
annexed areas to an"R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District and "B -
2A" Barrier Island Business District on Nueces County Park No.
2 (Packery Channel Park), located on the east side of South
Padre Island Drive, north of Verdemar Drive. (Attachment # 24)
Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Denial of
the "R-1 B" and "B -2A" Districts, and in lieu thereof, approval of an
"F -R" Farm -Rural District on Tracts 1 and 2.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
T]
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 9
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by the City of
Corpus Christi by changing the zoning map in reference to the
newly annexed tracts totaling 50.01 acres, designated as Area A,
Tract 1 and 2, by zoning as "FR" Farm -Rural District; amending
the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the
existing Comprehensive Plan; requiring application for Certificate
of Occupancy for nonconforming use.
25. Case No. CO202-02A City of Corpus Christi• Zone newly
annexed areas to an "R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District and "AT"
Apartment Tourist District on 230.23 acres out of William Bryan
Survey 606, Land Survey 64, located on the southeast side of
State Highway 361, northeast of South Padre Island Drive.
(Attachment # 25)
Planning Commission's and Staff's Recommendation: Denial of
the "R-1 B" District, and in lieu thereof, approval of an "F -R" Farm -
Rural District on Tract 1 and "AT" Apartment Tourist District on
Tract 2.
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by the City of
Corpus Christi by changing the zoning map in reference to the
newly annexed tracts totaling 230.23 acres, designated as Area
B, by zoning Tract 1 as "F -R" Farm -Rural District and Tract 2 as
"AT" Apartment -Tourist District; amending the Comprehensive
Plan to account for any deviations from the existing
Comprehensive Plan; requiring application for Certificate of
Occupancy for nonconforming use.
26. Case No. CO202-03A City of Corpus Christi• Zone newly
annexed areas to an "R-16" One -family Dwelling District on
Nueces County Park No. 1 (Padre Balli Park), located on the east
side of South Padre Island Drive, south of Whitecap Boulevard.
(Attachment # 26)
Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Denial of
the "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District, and in lieu thereof,
approval of an "F -R" Farm -Rural District.
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 10
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by the City of
Corpus Christi by changing the zoning map in reference to the
newly annexed tract totaling 195.92 acres, designed as Area C,
by zoning as "F -R" Farm -Rural District; amending the
Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the
existing Comprehensive Plan; requiring application for Certificate
of Occupancy for nonconforming use.
27. Case No. 0202-04A City of Corpus Christi: Zone newly annexed
areas to an "AT" Apartment Tourist District on Gulf of Mexico
beach frontage, 200 feet wide and 9,618 feet long, located east
of Park Road 22, south of Sea Pines Drive. (Attachment # 27)
Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Approval
of the "AT" Apartment Tourist District.
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by the City of
Corpus Christi by changing the zoning map in reference to the
newly annexed tract totaling 44.16 acres, designated as Area D,
by zoning as "AT" Apartment -Tourist District; amending the
Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the
existing Comprehensive Plan; requiring application for Certificate
of Occupancy for nonconforming use.
28. Case No. 0302-01. Isla Properties: A change of zoning from an
"R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District to an "RE" Residential Estate
District on Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts,
Section 38, south half of Lot 14, located on the north side of
Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 425 feet west of Scarlet Oak
Drive. (Attachment # 28)
Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Approval
of the "RE" Residential Estate District.
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 11
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Isla
Properties by changing the zoning map in reference to Lot 14,
Section 38, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, from
"R-1113" One -family Dwelling District to "RE" Residential Estate
District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any
deviations to the existing Comprehensive Plan.
29. Case No. 0302-02. Oceanic Development Ltd: A change of
zoning from an "R -1A" One -family Dwelling District and "R-113"
One -family Dwelling District to a "134" General Business District
on Tract 1 and "A-1" Apartment House District on Tract 2, on
Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 28,
being 6.5 acres out of Lots 1 and 2, located on the north side of
South Padre Island Drive, approximately 450 feet east of Rodd
Field Road. (Attachment # 29)
Plannino Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Approval
of the "B-4" General Business District on Tract 1 and "A-1"
Apartment House District on Tract 2.
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Oceanic
Development, Ltd. by changing the zoning map in reference to
6.5 acres out of Lots 1 and 2, Section 28, Flour Bluff and Encinal
Farm and Garden Tracts, from "R -1A" One -family Dwelling District
and "R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business
District on Tract 1 and "A-1" Apartment House District on Tract 2;
amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations
from the existing Comprehensive Plan.
K. PRESENTATIONS: (NO PRESENTATION ITEMS)
L. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS
NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT
APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. OR AT THE END OF THE
COUNCIL MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER PLEASE
LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN
TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD,
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 12
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
PLEASE SIGN THE FORMAT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL
CHAMBER, GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A
recording is made of the meeting, therefore, please speak into the microphone
located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition
or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City
Secretary.)
Si usted se dirge a la junta y cree qua su ingl6s es limifado, habr8 un int6rprete
ingl6s-espahol en la reuni6n de la junta para ayudarle.
PER CITYCOUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF
PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL
BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY
PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE
STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY
COUNCIL MEETING.
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into
executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss
any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of
the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code,
and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive
session on the following matters. In the event the Council elects to go
into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or
sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session
will be publicly announced by the presiding office.
30. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section
551.071 regarding City of Corpus Christi Project #3219,
Nourishment of Corpus Christi Beach - 2001, with possible
discussion and action related thereto in open session.
31. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Sections
551.071 and 551.072 regarding acquisition of approximately
11.95 acres owned by Rudolph T. Barrera, et ux, fora buffer zone
adjacent to the Oso Wastewater Treatment Plant, with possible
discussion and action related thereto in open session.
32. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Sections
551.071 regarding Hector Villareal et al v. Loyd Neal et al No.
020086800-F, 214'h District Court, Nueces County, Texas, with
possible discussion and action related thereto in open session.
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
April 16, 2002
Page 13
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
N. REPORTS:
The following reports include questions by Council to Staff regarding
City policies or activities, request by Council for information or reports
from Staff, reports of activities of individual Council members and Staff,•
constituent concems, current topics raised by media, follow-up on Staff
assignments; scheduling of future Council meetings and activities; and
other brief discussions regarding city -related matters.
33. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Upcoming Items
34. MAYOR'S UPDATE
35. COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS
O. ADJOURNMENT:
POSTING STATEMENT:
This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board at the front entrance
to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, at 2:30 p.m., April 12 2002.
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
NOTE: The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home
Page at www.ci.corpus-christi.tx.us after 7:00 p.m. on the
Friday before regularly scheduled council meetings. If
technical problems occur, the agenda will be uploaded on
the Internet by Monday morning.
Symbols used to highlight action item that implement
council priority issues.
2001-2002
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
AND
PRIORITY ISSUES
tCONTINUING PRIORITY
Airport / Seawall / CConvgntion Center / Aregg
• Continue quarterly reporting process for these initiatives.
'86 Bond Issue Improvements
• Update status on Senior Centers.
• Provide communication on completion of these projects (e.g. "Report to the Community').
• Continue community involvement on issues such as Leopard Street improvements.
Privatization / Re-Eng1jeering
• Clearly define "privatization" and "re-engineering."
• Make decisions regarding privatization and re-engineering in the next 12-24 months, with
discussions within 90 days.
• Establish process to identify what services can and cannot be privatized.
• Continue focus on park maintenance.
Finance
• Maintain the 5 -year forecast model.
• Review the August 1 budget adoption deadline.
Crime Control and Prevention
• Continue implementation of the Community Policing initiative.
• Establish date for Crime Control and Prevention District election.
• Continue City participation in Youth Opportunities United and other youth crime initiatives.
EmnloXee Health Care
• Address concerns related to employee compensation and benefits, including health insurance.
• Work to coordinate Police and hire health benefits with those of other City employees
Econgi is Develongietlt Sales Tia
Establish election date.
Stour Water Utility
• Reconsider implementation plan for a Storm Water Utility.
Packery Channel
• Continue quarterly reports on the progress of the TIF and Beach Restoration Project.
Landfill
• Continue to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of operations.
• Examine alternatives for solid waste management system, including privatization.
Intermet
• Continue regular updates and expansion of the City's web site, including individual council
member web pages.
• Establish target date for online permitting process.
• Communicate brush pickup via a -mail.
CABG
• Continue active role.
Frost Bank Buildia¢
• Lease and complete renovation
Annexation Plan
• Implement current island annexation plan
ADA Transition Plan
• Develop and approve ADA Transition Plan within 90 days.
ftdistricdug
• Develop Council -approved redistricting plan for the City of Corpus Christi
IndusWal District Cpntract
• Review industrial District contracts and determine date for approval
Council Action Items
• Staff completes action requests in a timely manner.
City / County Health Issues
• Continue discussions with County to determine structure and process for the most effective
and efficient delivery of health services
Marke of CC Museum and Columbus Shius
• Continue to develop marketing plans for the Museum of Science and History and the
Columbus Fleet
NEW PRIORITY INITIATIVES AND ISSUES
City staff will develop and present to City Council action/implement0ion plans for the following priority
areas:
6 Desalination Pilot Project
n*Code Enforcement in Trashy Neighborhoods
a*Employee Classification Study
V-1
Master Drainage Plan
AGarwood Water
jb *New Golf Course
AIA *Charter Revision with Specific Charge(s)
rip
*More Funding for Economic Development
*Fire and Police Contracts
New Funding Sources / Plan for Inner City Improvements
Improve Permitting Process (online / customer service)
Padre Island Development Plan
WDowntown / South Central Development Plan (marina, t -heads, breakwater)
111 Housing Emphasis / Process (older neighborhoods, working class neighborhoods)
**Road Projects
ISouthside Traffic Plan
Relationships with Other Governments
Development Initiative Packages
*Park Rehabilitation
*Leopard Street Curbs and Gutters
Economic Development Summit and Post -Summit Meetings
Agnes -Laredo Corridor Market (studies, plans)
*Solid waste / Pickup
Base Closures
**Northwest Library
Northside Development Plan
Traffic Controls (channeling, studying on/off ramps on SPID)
*Five Points Ambulance
Effluent Plan for Leopard Medians
RTA—Public Improvements
Arts and Sciences Park Plan
Budget Item
** Capital Improvement Program Item
1
MINUTES
JOINT MEETING OF THE
CORPUS CHRISTI CITY COUNCIL AND
CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
March 26, 2002 - 12:07 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr.*
Mayor Pro Tem Brent Chesney*
Javier Colmenero*
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex Kinnison
John Longoria*
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
Ci_ty Staff Present
City Manager David R. Garcia
City Attomey James R. Bray Jr.
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Police Commander Bryan Smith
Recording Secretary Rachelle Parry
CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD
Linda Bridges, President
Vicky Alexander
Larry Baker
John Heldenfels
W.L. Hermis
Butch Pool
Rose Made Soto
Isaac Valencia
ABSENT
Danny Mora (Crime Control)
The meeting was called to order in the Basement Training Room of City Hall. City Secretary
Chapa checked the roll and verified that quorums of both the Council and the Crime Control District
(CCD) Board were present to conduct the meeting.
Ms. Bridges said that the board would make a short presentation to update the Council on
the district's progress and then be available for questions. Cmdr. Smith explained that district fimds
were used to purchase 20 radars which have been installed in the patrol cars; another 17 will arrive
in the next allotment. Assistant Chief Bung said they are awaiting one more signature to proceed
with the video imaging project. Cmdr. Smith said the community policing mobile vehicle has been
used in various ways around the city and there are 179 families in case management at the Juvenile
Assessment Center. The district provides funds for two case managers there.
*Mayor Neal and Council Members Colmenero and Longoria arrived at about 12:10 p.m.
Cmdr. Smith also discussed how district monies have assisted the city in installing a special
graffiti-resistant laminate on street signs in specific neighborhoods identified by directed patrol
officers. He said it is cost-prohibitive to use that laminate on all the city's street signs.
Ms. Bridges addressed the district's proposed FY 2002-03 budget. She said the CCD board
will hold a heating on the budget on April 17, 2002 and adopt it during their May 8th meeting. The
City Council must hold a public heating on the adopted budget on or before the June 1 lth Council
Minutes - Joint Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 2
meeting to meet the June 16th deadline. On or before their June 25th meeting, the Council must
approve or reject the CCD budget by the July 2nd deadline.
Ms. Bridges said that while the board is very positive about the CCD being renewed by the
voters during the November 2002 election, they also want to ensure that they have contingency plans
in case it is not renewed. Cmdr. Smith said the proposed budget essentially continues the funding
of the 50 police officers (the last 10 officers will start the police academy in April).
Cmdr. Smith said that when the CCD was formed five years ago, it paid for 25 civilian
positions. In FY01-02, six civilian positions were cut (three dispatchers and three crime scene
technicians). In order to fund the remaining 10 police officers in FY02-03, another 16 civilian
positions will have to be cut: legal advisor, seven dispatchers, one crime scene technician, and seven
office assistants (three from the pawn shop unit and four from the telephone reporting unit). He said
those reductions--which equal about $750,000--will result in three civilian positions being funded
by the CCD. Cmdr. Smith said that staff had recommended retaining those civilian positions and
limiting the number of police officers to 40 instead of 50.
A discussion ensued about the proposed budget and Cmdr. Smith responded to Council
members' questions. Assistant Chief Bung pointed out that the elimination of seven of the civilian
positions will slow down the implementation of some of the C CD's technological programs. Mr.
Mark McDaniel, Director of Management and Budget, said the proposed revenue for FY02-03 is
about $3.8 million. Cmdr. Smith also reviewed the budget calendar.
*Council Member Chesney arrived at approximately 12:25 p.m.
Ms. Bridges said she had informed the Council via a letter that the CCD board unanimously
supports a five-year renewal of the district through a continuation referendum in the November 2002
election. She said the board had originally discussed a 1 O-year renewal period but reconsidered to
five years for several reasons. She said the board has budgeted monies for administrative costs
associated with the election.
Council Member Scott asked what would occur if the CCD renewal failed in November. City
Manager Garcia said the city would begin the process of realigning the Police Department, which
would have to be reduced by the 50 officers being funded by district monies. Additional discussion
ensued and Mr. Garcia pointed out that the city does not have the resources to support the district's
programs. Mayor Neal asked the CCD board members to develop suggestions on how the Council
can promote the district's renewal.
Responding to Council Member Colmenero, City Attomey Bray said the ballot language for
the renewal election is prescribed by the statute. The Mayor said it is important to promote the many
benefits of the Crime Control District. Cmdr. Smith added that the existence of the district is critical
to the community policing initiative. There being no other business, Mayor Neat adjourned the joint
meet'mg at 12:42 p.m. on March 26, 2002.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
1:07 p.m.
PRESENT
Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Brent Chesney
Council Members:
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
Ci_ty Staff:
City Manager David R. Garcia
Deputy City Manager George Noe
City Attorney James R. Bray Jr.
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Recording Secretary Rachelle Parry
Mayor Neal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The invocation
was delivered by Pastor Shane Kinnison, Parkdale Baptist Church, and the Pledge of Allegiance to
the United States flag was led by Council Member Kinnison. City Secretary Chapa called the roll
and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present
to conduct the meeting. Mayor Neal called for approval of the minutes of the Council retreat meeting
of March 15, 2002 and the regular Council meeting of March 19, 2002. A motion was made and
passed to approve the minutes as presented.
Mayor Neal called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 2-13). Council members
requested that Items 4 and 5 be discussed. There were no comments from the audience. City
Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes and the following passed:
2. M2002-078
Motion approving a supply agreement with Pencco Inc. of San Felipe, Texas, for
approximately 2,050,000 gallons of ferrous sulfate in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-
0062~02 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $466,375. The term of the
supply agreement will be for twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional
twelve-month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his
designee. Funds have been budgeted in FY2001-2002 by the Wastewater Department.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
3. M2002-079
Motion approving a supply agreement with R&R Delivery Service of Corpus Christi, Texas,
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 2
for meal delivery service consisting of~the delivery of approximately 126,002 meals for the
Elderly Nutrition Program, Adult Protective and Title XX Meals on Wheels, in accordance
with Bid Invitation No. BI-0061-02 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure
of $134,822.14. The term of the agreement will be for twelve months with options to extend
for up to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the contractor and
the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Senior Community
Services of the Parks and Recreation Department in FY2001-2002.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
6.a. ORDINANCE NO. 024807
Ordinance appropriating $206,250 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Wastewater Fund
No. 4200 for services to update wastewater infrastructure data; amending Ordinance No.
024528 which adopted the FY2001-2002 operating budget to increase appropriations by
$206,250.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
6.b. M2002~082
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into an agreement with EMA,
Inc. of Horton, Texas, for geographic information system (GIS)-related services for an
amount not to exceed $494,000. Services included are to update and confirm the water and
wastewater infrastructure data; to design the geodatabases for the Utilities; and convert the
data to ESRI's ArcGIS software and migrate it to the geodatabases. Funds are available in
the Gas, Stormwater, Water and Wastewater Departments.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kiunison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
6.c. M2002-083
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into an agreement with Spatial
Solutions of Fort Collins, Colorado, for an amount not to exceed $51,810. Services included
are to convert the basemap and parcel data to ArcGIS software and migrate it to the
geodatases. Funds are available in the Municipal Information Systems Fund.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kiunison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 3
10.
11.a.
M2002-084
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with
Miller & Miller Mechanical Contracting Company Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the
amount of $40,171 for the Memorial Coliseum air handler replacement project FY2002.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
M2002-085
Motion approving the application from the Art Community Center of Corpus Christi to
temporarily close Cooper's Alley between northbound and southbound Shoreline Boulevard
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. & 7:00 p.m. on April 13-14, 2002 for the Attfest 2002 event.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
ORDINANCE NO. 024808
Ordinance amending Section 10-86 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi,
regarding beach user fees; providing for penalties.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kiunison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
RESOLUTION NO. 024809
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 37
with the Texas Department of Transportation in the amount of $48,535.20 for the installation
of groundboxes for future street lighting as part of the Spur 3, Phase 2, Eunis Joslin Road
construction contract.
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
]~ESOLUTION NO. 024810
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept Amendment No. 2 for the
Federal Aviation Administration Multi-Year Grant No. 3-48-0051-28-00 in the amount of
$115,658.
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Noyola abstaining.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 4
11.b. ORDINANCE NO. 024811
Ordinance appropriating $115,658 from Federal Aviation Adm'mistration Grant No. 3-48-
0051-28-00, Amendment No. 2 in the No. 3020 Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the
terminal reconstruction program.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Noyola abstaining.
12. ORDINANCE NO. 024812
Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53-Traffic, Section 53-250 - Schedule
I, One-Way Streets and Alleys, Section (A-l) School Areas, by establishing a time-restricted
one-way traffic pattern on Panama Dr. in the westbound direction from Kingston Drive to
Carroll Lane during the school hours of Kostoryz Elementary School; providing for penalties.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
13. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Ordinance amending the Code of ordinances, Chapter 53-Traffic, Section 53-250 - Schedule
I, One-Way Streets and Alleys, Section(a), by establishing a one-way traffic pattern on
Riverwood Drive in the northbound direction of travel from F.M. Highway 624 (Northwest
Boulevard) to River Hill Drive at all times; providing for penalties.
The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 4, benefits administration module. In response to
Council Member Kelly, Assistant City Manager Jorge Cruz-Aedo explained that that module was
acquired with the original PeopleSoft software. Precision Task Group Inc. is being hired to
implement the application. He said the use of this software in the Risk Management Department will
help avoid future costs. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
4. M2002-080
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into a contract with Precision
Task Group Inc. of Houston, Texas, for consulting services for PeopleSoft benefits
administration module implementation in accordance with the State of Texas Cooperative
Purchasing Program for a total amount of $85,140. Funds have been budgeted by Risk
Management in FY2001-2002.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
Mamh 26, 2002
Page 5
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 5, purchase of software and services. Council
Member Scott asked about this purchase. Mr. Ogilvie Gericke, Director of Information Systems,
explained that this software will constitute the "back-end" system for building permits, business
licenses and code enforcement. City Manager Garcia said the city is in the process of transitioning
from a paper system to a computer system for those applications by automating the data base.
Eventually, several applications will be available on the city's intemet site. Council Member
Longoria asked if this will be part of the "one-stop" center for building permits and other services.
Mr. Garcia said this is part of that foundation. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council as follows:
5. M2002-081
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to purchase software modules, services,
and vendor travel expenses for on-site services for Building Permits, Business Licenses and
Code Enforcement from HTE Inc. of Lake Mary, Florida, in an amount not to exceed
$102,200 for the departments of Development Services and Housing and Community
Development.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal deviated from the regular agenda and went to the first presentation (Item 18),
a project update by the Waters Consulting Group Inc. on the development of a compensation and
classification system for all city employees except Police and Fire personnel covered by collective
bargaining agreements.
Ms. Ruth Ann Edwards, a consultant with Waters Consulting Group (WCG), introduced Mr.
Rollie Waters, CEO of the finn. Ms. Edwards gave a comprehensive computer presentation about
the goals of the compensation study and the progress made to this point. She said the first step is to
ensure that the city's system complies with federal legislation (ADA, Fair Labor Standards Act,
EEO, etc.). She said WCG is also looking at how the city has established its pay structure within the
organization (internal equity), market competitiveness, and budgeting issues.
Ms. Edwards then discussed the project overview. She noted that WCG has been working
with the City Manager, a steering committee consist'rog of city employees, a job evaluation team and
now the Council to receive feedback on different policies and objectives throughout the study. She
pointed out that WCG is tailoring the program to meet the city's individual needs.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 6
Ms. Edwards said that an initial planning session was held in August 2001 and much progress
has been made since then: the job evaluations have been completed, the internal hierarchy of jobs
has been established, and the market data has been gathered and applied to the individual employees.
She said now WCG can develop a salary structure and they will be coming back to the Council in
April to discuss how to implement it for individual employees. She said the end result will be a pay
system that has administrative policies and procedures, so that not only will city officials be able to
manage how employees are handled in the pay system on a daily basis, they will also have
information on how to keep the system up-to-date and in line with the outside market.
The WCG consultant further discussed specific aspects of the study, including the
communication strategy; development of the job descriptions and the point factor job evaluations;
establishment ora market policy; and key considerations in designing a customized salary structure.
She noted that one of the ways the city reduced the cost of the project was to have WCG train
employees to complete the job description revisions once the access data base was developed. Ms.
Edwards said the last part of the project will consist of the following tasks: salary policies and
procedures will be finalized; movement through the pay ranges will be established for future
maintenance; recommendations for pay increases will be presented; program maintenance using a
specific software program will be established; and a formal presentation will be made to the Council.
Responding to a question from Mayor Neal, Mr. Garcia said staff is planning a phased
implementation of the results of this study. Council Member Kinnison posed a hypothetical situation
about changing pay ranges. Ms. Edwards said them are several policy decisions the Council will
need to make about those issues. Mr. Waters pointed out that different departments may have
different issues and WCG will be making recommendations on how to handle all of them. He
acknowledged that implementation of the results will be driven by the financial resources that will
be available. He said WCG factors in cost-of-living differentials in different markets.
Responding to Council Member Colmenero, Ms. Cynthia Garcia, Director of Human
Resources, and Ms. Edwards explained specific aspects of the study. Council Member Scott asked
about the benefits survey. Ms. Edwards said it will include not only medical insurance but also paid
leave and special types of pay. In reply to another question from Mr. Scott, Mr. Garcia said there are
a wide range of job categories in which the city is out of balance in comparison to other markets.
However, he said the question is the amount of money the city can afford to spend to bring those jobs
in line with the market. He said one of the reasons WCG received such good cooperation from
employees is because they expect the study to affect their compensation. Council Member Noyola
asked for a list of the steering committee members and Ms. Garcia discussed its composition as well
as the make up of the job evaluation team.
Mayor Neal recessed the Council meeting to read the day's proclamations.
Upon reconvening, Mayor Neal referred to Item 14, and a motion was made, seconded and
passed to open the public heating on the following zoning case:
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 7
14.
Case No. 0202-05. Ata O. Azali and Taybeh Mostagahsi: A change of zoning fi.om an "F-R"
Farm-Rural District to an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Flour Bluffand Encinal
Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 19, being 7.5 acres out of Lots 11 and 12, located on the
north side of Wooldridge Road, approximately 150 feet west of Windsong Drive.
City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission and staffrecommended approval of the
"R-lB" One-family Dwelling District. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Mr.
Chesney made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Mr. Kinnison, and passed. Mr.
Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 024813
Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Am O. Azali and Taybeh Mostagahsi,
by changing the zoning map in reference to 2.5 acres out of Lot 11 and 5 acres out of Lot 12,
Section 19, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, fi.om "F-R" Farm-Rural
District to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to
account for any deviations fi.om the existing Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
The second presentation (Item 15) was regarding the emergency home repair grant program.
Mr. Norbert Hart, Director of Housing and Community Development (HCD), said it is designed to
assist home owners ages 62 or older and/or disabled individuals with no age limit with repairs to
their homes. He said the program provides a means for very low-income home owners to have
defects in their homes repaired which would otherwise endanger their health and safety.
Mr. Hart said the grants, which cannot exceed $6,500 each, only address the following home
repairs: roofing, plumbing, electrical, heating systems, accessibility modifications, and minor
structural defects associated with those repairs. The program was started in October 1984 and it has
assisted more than 2,297 elderly and disabled persons. Organizations which participate in repair and
assistance programs are the Kiwanis Clubs, United Methodist Church (Sea City Work Camp), and
the Corpus Christi Police Department (Community Relations Division).
Mr. Hart said the annual funding for the emergency repair grant program comes from the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. He said the HCD staff submits funding
recommendations to the Planning Commission, which reviews all the applications and in mm makes
recommendations to the City Council, which has the final approval. Total approved funding has
ranged from $250,874 in 1984 to $900,000 in 1997; the last five fiscal years the funding level has
remained at $850,000. He also discussed the specific eligibility criteria and income limits.
With regard to grant processing, Mr. Hart explained that all applicants are seen by HCD staff
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 8
members, who assist them in filling out the applications. The program is explained and a housing
assessment form is completed to determine if the applicant has an existing or impending hazard. He
said if it is determined that a hazard does not exist, the applicant's name is placed on a waiting list
(which may take as long as a year); otherwise, the case is processed immediately. The average
processing time for a non-hazardous grant is about two to four months from the date the
homeowner's name is selected from the waiting list to the completion date. The actual construction
time is 15 working days (three weeks). He said about 20 cases a month are elected from the waiting
list on a "tint come, first served" basis, which conforms to the non-discriminatory procedures
established in the Fair Housing Act.
The HCD Director also discussed the criteria for determining a hazard and characteristics of
the grant program's waiting list. He noted that people who have received prior assistance make up
a major portion of that list, which creates an additional delay for tint-time applicants. Mr. Hart then
reviewed statistics of the emergency repair grant program and services provided by the HCD
Department. He said the grant funds required to address the applicant waiting list are $911,662. He
also reviewed the contractor recruitment criteria and characteristics.
Mr. Hart said staffwas recommending the following: eliminate the requirement for workers
compensation; increase the program funding level to $1.2 million; revise the current program policy
to reflect that applicants can only apply once for assistance; retain second-time assistance for tree
hazards; and revise the retainage to $100 or 5% (starting at $2,000). He said staff intends to bring
back additional information during the Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation annual
meeting in April.
Mayor Neal said staff's request for additional funding for the emergency repair grant program
will have to be considered along with all the other requests during the upcoming CDBG hearing. He
added that personally he would not approve eliminating the workers compensation requirement.
Council Member Colmenero referred to the lengthy waiting list, and Mr. Hart said that
limiting the program to first-time applicants would significantly reduce it. He added that second
applications should be allowed for legitimate hazards. Responding to a question from Mr.
Colmenero, Mr. Hart said the eligibility guidelines have been in place since the program's inception.
Responding to Council Member Kelly, Mr. Hart said that any monies that are not spent as
part of the Annual Action Plan (which includes the CDBG program) are reallocated by the Council.
He said the time period to process a grant is now about nine months. He added that this year's
allocation for the emergency repair grant program has already been expended, although some money
has been reserved for tree hazards. He said staffhas been working to streamline the process and now
the problem is a lack of sufficient finding.
Council Member Longoria said he thought that staff should make every effort to satisfy
citizens' concerns about whether or not a hazard exists in their homes. Mr. Hart said staffdoes not
physically inspect the house of every applicant unless they identify a hazard. Mr. Longoria said that
if an applicant has not used all of the $6,500 in allocated grant funds, he does not consider them
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 9
second-time applicants. Mr. Hart reiterated that such participants lengthen the waiting period for
first-time applicants. Additional discussion ensued about the application process.
In reply to other questions from Mr. Longoria, Mr. Hart said that in the emergency repair
program, the contractors are paid in a lump sum at the end, while in the rehab program (such as with
$50,000 contracts) contractors get draws as they proceed. City Attorney Bray said that since those
contracts are for private homes and not public works projects, the statute does not apply.
Mr. Hector Vallejo, HCD Program Manager, said that some small contractors are not able
to participate in the program because of the workers compensation requirement. He added that
currently the repair projects are done on a rotation basis with the contractors; they average about one
per month. Mr. Longoria commented on the importance of the emergency repair grant program,
saying he would like it to operate as efficiently as possible. He added that he thinks staff should
request the $1.2 million to shorten the waiting period. Responding to Council Member Noyola, Mr.
Jack Perales, Housing Administration Supervisor, further explained specifics of the repair program
and the warranties.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Items 19, 20 and 21 regarding the Corpus Christi Beach
nourishment project. City Manager Garcia explained that it is not a city project--it was undertaken
by the Texas General Land Office (GLO) and the city supported them in facilitating the construction.
Mr. Cruz-Aedo explained that the Council is being asked to approve the issuance of $1.3
million of anticipation notes, which are short-term securities that will be issued by the city at a rate
of 4.65%. He said they are structured over six years--two years are interest-only and the remaining
four years are principal and interest. He added that they are callable at any time so that proceeds from
a settlement on the original contract can be used to redeem them.
Mr. Garcia said the city terminated the contract with the original contractor because he was
unable to complete the project to the city's satisfaction. Consequently, the city has turned to the
contractor's bonding company to cure the default and staff expects to successfully conclude those
discussions. He added that since the City Charter requires that all funds be available before a contract
can be approved, these anticipation notes will provide the funding in the short tenn. Mayor Neal
asked why the city cannot use the commercial paper program to fund this contract. Mr. Cruz-Aedo
said that commercial paper is only used for utility projects.
Mr. JeffLeuschel, of McCall, Parkhurst and Horton, said that there is a specific statute that
authorizes cities and counties to issue short-term notes of up to seven years in maturity payable from
taxes, revenues or bond proceeds. He said Zions First National Bank is fully aware of the receipt of
the surety bond proceeds and they are agreeable to having them taken out at any time. He said there
will be a slight premium of 1% associated with that so there will be a cost of $13,000 in addition to
the $1.3 million to settle the payment. He said they anticipate an April 24th delivery of the notes.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 10
Responding to Council Member Kinnison, City Attorney Bray said city staff is in
negotiations with the bonding company, which has not been able to obtain a decision fi.om their
corporate hierarchy yet. Mr. Garcia said the safest thing would be to not do anything until the
bonding company makes a decision about what they will pay. However, staff felt this project created
a hardship for the property owners on Corpus Christi Beach and the city needed to proceed
expeditiously to address the problem. He added that the state is supportive of the city's actions.
Council Member Kelly asked what will happen if the bonding company refuses to pay. Mr.
Bray replied that the city will have a cause of action against them if they cannot reach a settlement.
Mr. Kelly also asked if staff knows where the proposed contractor will obtain the sand. Assistant
City Manager Ron Massey said he has indicated one source. He said the quality control measures
are still in effect and staffwill ensure that the sand meets the specifications before it is placed on the
beach. Mr. Garcia reiterated that the previous contract was terminated because the company did not
provide the proper quality of sand.
Council Member Chesney said he and Mr. Kelly had questioned the previous contractor's
work and he said he is still concerned about those issues. Mr. Angel Escobar, Director of
Engineering Services, said the consultant, Shiner Moseley, has done an exhaustive background check
on Longhorn Excavators Inc. Mr. Chesney said he wants to make sure this project is completed
correctly this time and he hopes the city pursues a settlement with the bonding company.
Responding to Council Member Colmenero, Mr. Leuschel said this process is the best and
quickest method to complete the project. Mr. Colmenero asked that staff communicate with the
residents and businesses on Corpus Christi Beach about the project. Mr. Escohar said they will
continue to do so. Council Member Scott commented favorably about the funding mechanism and
he asked about Longhorn's experience in this type of work. Mr. Escobar said the company has
completed projects that utilize a similar construction process (movement and placement of materials
to meet specifications). In reply to Mr. Scott, Mr. Dan Heilman of Shiner Moseley said the level of
care they used in checking references for this project is in excess of what is normally done. Mr.
Escobar said that Mr. Parker, one of the owners of Longhorn Excavators, was also present.
There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council:
19. ORDINANCE NO. 024814
Ordinance authorizing the issuance of anticipation notes in the amount of $1,300,000;
approving the sale of the notes and ordaining other matters related thereto.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
20. ORDINANCE NO. 024815
Ordinance appropriating $1,300,000 fi.om the issuance of anticipation notes into Fund No.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 11
3280, Park CIP Fund, Project 130465, Corpus Christi Beach nourishment, mending
Ordinance No. 024730 which adopted the FY2001-2002 Capital Budget by increasing
expenditures by $1,300,000.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kiunison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
21. M2002-086
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction conlxact with
Longhorn Excavators Inc. of Sugarland, Texas, for the total fee not to exceed $1,190,000 for
the nourishment of Corpus Christi Beach.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 22, convention center and arena altemative delivery
methods. City Secretary Chapa said that Council Member Kelly would be abstaining fi'om discussing
or voting on this item.
Mr. Kevin Stowers, Assistant Director of Engineering Services, said staff was bringing the
Council the recommendation of the City Major Construction Projects Advisory Panel to proceed
with an alternative delivery method. He said that method became available to Texas cities in
September 2001 for architectural projects. He said the panel is recommending the use of competitive
sealed proposals for the new arena and the use of a construction manager at risk for the convention
center expansion and rehabilitation project.
Mr. Freddie Bustillo, of Gilbane Building Company, the project manager, gave a presentation
about the new delivery method. He said that about 15 months ago, city staff asked Gilbane
representatives to discuss with the advisory panel members about how to maximurn opportunities
for local involvement. He said the panel consists of representatives of several local organizations,
including the Hispanic Contractors Association, AGC, MBOC, MBDC, Hispanic and Black
Chambers of Commerce and others.
Mr. Bustillo said they concluded that one of the first steps was to conduct a market resource
assessment of the Corpus Christi firms that would have an interest in the convention center and arena
projects. He said they jointly developed a contractor information request form and Gilhane gave
presentations to associations about the projects. He said they developed a database of 559 firms
which the city can now use and, of those, they refined a list of almost 200 firms that are directly
related to the construction industry. Mr. Bustillo said they then took the database of the 200 firms
and delineated the firms' bonding capacity and largest project in 2000.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 12
In meetings with the advisory panel, Mr. Bustillo said they discussed three types of delivery
methods: competitive bidding, competitive sealed proposal, and construction management at risk.
He said that competitive bidding is the traditional method with which most public agencies are very
familiar. The competitive sealed proposal is similar to it in that the owner selects an
architect/engineer (A/E) to design the project. Once construction documents are completed, the
owner solicits proposals from contractors to perform the work. Selection is generally based on a
combination of price and other factors that the owner deems in its best interest. He said the advisory
panel is recommending competitive sealed proposal for the arena project.
Mr. Bustillo also explained the concept of construction management at risk. He said it is a
delivery system wherein the construction manager at risk (CMR) serves as the general contractor,
assuming the risk for the construction guaranteed price and providing design-phase consultation in
evaluating costs, schedule, implications of alternative designs/systems, and materials. He said that
selection is based on criteria that combine qualifications and experience and may involve fees and
general conditions. He said the panel is recommending the CMR for the convention center project.
Responding to Council Member Kinnison, Mr. Bustillo said that in a competitive sealed
proposal, state law requires that the selection criteria be identified. With regard to the CMR process,
Mr. Bustillo said they have discussed hiring the CMR and negotiating his fee and general conditions.
He said once the team has concurred that the plans are ready to be released for the subcontractors
to bid and those bids come in, the city will then have the pricing information. He said the city can
ask the CM firm to develop a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) before subcontractor bids have
been received. Mr. Stowers said the panel and city staff are considering having a GMP for the
convention center. He said if the bids from the trade organizations come in lower, the savings would
normally accrue back to the city.
Mr. Kinnison asked Mr. Bustillo to specifically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
the CMR delivery system. He explained that the disadvantages are reduced adversarial relationship;
difficult for owner to evaluate the validity of the GMP; and potential adversarial relationship with
the A/E. The advantages are builder selection flexibility; design-phase assistance; single point of
responsibility for construction; team concept; faster delivery schedule; and flexibility to change. He
said coordination will be very important since the convention center and arena projects will be
constructed simultaneously. He said Gilbane will be charged with many tasks, including evaluating
the work sequence.
In reply to Council Member Longoria, Mr. Bustillo said Gilbane was hired to serve as the
city's representative with the design and construction communities. He said that in the competitive
sealed proposal process, the general contractor ultimately is responsible for going out and soliciting
subcontractors to bid the job to him. In addition, it is the task of both Gilhane and the advisory panel
to continue to generate interest among the local businesses to get involved in the project. He added
that the general contractor provides the bond for the entire project.
Mr. Busfillo said that in the construction management at risk scenario, the CMR is selected
before trade (subcontractor) bids are submitted. He said the panel members are recommending that
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 13
process for the convention center project because they want an "open book" process for the trade
packages. He added that the owner can determine the selection criteria. He said that in this scenario,
competitive sealed proposal is the procurement method while the delivery method is construction
management at risk. He added that bonding was an important issue to the advisory panel. Mr.
Bustillo said that ifa subcontractor is not able to complete the work, the CMR is able to hire a firm
to only complete those tasks. He added that an important factor is to have a city representative
present with the CMR when he accepts the trade contractors. By doing that, neither the city nor the
CMR can release that information until the award has been completed.
Responding to another question from Mr. Longoria, Mr. Stowers said the CMR delivery
system does not affect the design process, the schedule or the architects, who ultimately have to
provide all of the drawings and specifications. However, it will change some of the "front-end"
documents and staff is working with the Legal Department on that issue.
In reply to Council Member Scott, Mr. Stowers said the state statute requires that the city hire
the A/E first, which is different from federal procurement. He added that staff is working with the
advisory panel to ensure all of their major concerns are being addressed through the CMR delivery
method. City Manager Garcia added that the city is able to use a modified CMR process because the
state law which allows the city to do this did not go into effect until September 2001, after the city
had started the process. Mr. Massey said the city hired Gilbane to keep the architects on target to
minimize the contract costs.
Responding to other questions from Mr. Scott, Mr. Stowers said one of the advantages of the
competitive sealed proposal process is that it allows the city to avoid certain contractors that may be
capable of bonding the project but generally do not have a good track record in terms of quality of
work or cooperation. Mr. Garcia said there will be two very different types of construction going on--
a new facility (arena) and expansion/rehabilitation (convention center).
Replying to Council Member Colmenero, Mr. Bustillo said one of the advantages of using
the CMR process for the convention center is that he can sequence the work, which is important
since conventions will still be going on throughout the construction process. Council Member
Noyola asked about the database. Mr. Bustillo said the first list of companies was very long because
the names were provided by the advisory panel members and some of the companies are not in the
design or construction business; he reiterated that about 200 firms did respond. He said the CMR has
the final word on hiring the subcontractors for the convention center project with a caveat explained
by City Attorney Bray.
There were no comments from the audience. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes:
22.a. M2002~087
Motion authorizing staffto proceed with selection of a Construction Manager at Risk for the
convention center expansion and renovation project.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 14
22.b.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Kelly abstaining.
M2002-088
Motion authorizing staff to proceed with competitive sealed proposals to hire a General
Contractor for the multipurpose arena project.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Kelly abstaining.
The third presentation (Item 16) was regarding the Health Department's Animal Control
euthanasia methods. Using a computer presentation, Mr. Cruz-Aedo said the department's goal is
to use the most effective, humane method of euthanizatien in relation to the cost. He said the current
method is a carbon monoxide gas chamber and an alternative method is lethal injection of denatured
sodium pentobarbital. He said the conditions of euthanasia are as follows: must cause brain death
or cessation of brain activity first (then respiration and cardiac activity can cease); must cause little
to no pain; must be quick and humane; and circumstances dictate the method.
Mr. Cruz-Aedo said the number of animals euthanized at the Animal Control facility has
decreased over the years because of a lack of staffing and resulting inability to pick up all the stray
animals. He said that in the 1980s, 10,000 to 12,000 animals were euthanized locally and the number
rose to between 20,000 and 24,000 in the late 1990s. In FY 2000-01, 14,400 animals were
euthanized. He said the types of animals euthanized are dogs, cats, opossums, raccoons, birds,
snakes, skunks, coyotes, foxes and others. Currently, the average number of animals euthanized daily
is five to 10 on weekends and holidays and 50 to 100 on weekdays (depending on the time of year).
The animals' ages range from newborn to 20 years old, although most are between 1 and 7 years.
The Assistant City Manager said there are many reasons why animals are euthanized,
including that the animal is sick, injured, old, is a bite case, and is declared dangerous. In addition,
many owners take their pets or their pets' offspring to the Animal Control facility because they are
disruptive or destructive (barks, chews, bites); uncontrollable; unable to be placed elsewhere; or they
just do not want the animals anymore. He said local governments have the following responsibilities:
euthanize all animals that need it when presented (i.e., sick, injured, owner request, etc.); adopt,
transfer and find homes for all healthy animals when possible; euthanize all unwanted and
unadoptable animals at little or no cost, regardless of the owner; and determine the cost-effectiveness
of the program.
Mr. Cruz-Aedo then specifically discussed the advantages and disadvantages of both the
carbon monoxide chamber and lethal injection. He said studies have concluded that animals sense
when the end is imminent, which is a factor in both methods. He said the advantages of the carbon
monoxide chamber are that it is less expensive with larger numbers of animals; not personal ("hands-
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 15
off" aspect for personnel); reduces the risk of injury to personnel; can accommodate a large number
of animals in a short-time; and is preferred for wildlife and hazardous animals.
The disadvantages of the carbon monoxide chamber are that it is stressful to the animals
because they know what is happening; there is a delay between brain activity cessation and breathing
and heartbeat cessation, sometimes resulting in involuntary reflexes (dogs howling and cats climbing
the side of the cage); is offensive to many personnel; and is associated with World War II genocide.
He said that based on a model provided by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the
costs of this method per animal are: labor - $0.116; equipment - $0.068; and supplies - $0.09, for a
total per animal of $0.27 and a total in FY 2000-01 of $4,172 (for 14,400 animals).
Mr. Cruz-Aedo said the advantages of injection euthanization are that it is more humane to
the animal (cessation of brain activity, respiration and heartbeat occur at roughly the same time); it
is less stressful to the animal (individual versus a group); and it is preferable to society. The
disadvantages are that it is more labor intensive; more expensive (medicine and supplies); requires
personnel to handle every animal (more stress on employees and greater risk of injury); higher
remover of employees; and wildlife pose difficult situations. Using the PETA model, the costs are:
labor - $0.95; equipment - $0.031; and supplies - $2.26, for a total per animal of $3.24 and a total
in FY 2000-01 of $48,276.00.
Mr. Cruz-Aedo noted that recently the Animal Control facility adopted new standards for the
use of lethal injection (specifically with regard to animals less than four months old), and it is still
used on sick and injured animals in the field. Consequently, lethal injection is used for euthanization
15% to 20% of the time. He said that if the city were to use lethal injection 100% of the time
beginning in FY02-03, a supplemental funding request would be required. He said staff estimates
that the euthanasia equipment and supplies would cost $50,000 and four additional personnel would
cost $150,000, for a total additional funding request of $200,000.
With regard to other Texas cities, Mr. Cmz-Aedo said that most are going to lethal injection
euthanasia (San Antonio, Garland, and Irving still use carbon monoxide). However, most other cities
do not handle as large a population of wildlife as Corpus Christi does. He said local organizations
that selectively place pets are the Gulf Coast Humane Society, Peewee's Pet Adoption and PALS,
while CCARIE and the Lost Pet Hotline serve in other ways. However, he noted, the city's Animal
Control facility is not selective. Mr. Cruz-Aedo said this is a public policy decision of the Council,
and while euthanasia is the final result of the animal overpopulation issue, there are causes that need
to be addressed. He said the Council can discuss this issue further during the budget process.
Mayor Neal asked how long it would take for the city to staffup to do lethal injection 100%
of the time. Mr. Jeff Beynon, Animal Control Supervisor, said the current facility would not
accommodate that method without some changes being made to the facility. City Manager Garcia
said staff can provide the cost information to do that. Mr. Cmz-Aedo said it would take about 90
days to hire the necessary staff. The Mayor said he has asked the Animal Control Advisory
Committee to meet as quickly as possible so they can make recommendations to the Council, and
he has also sought input from local veterinarians regarding the related costs of total lethal injection.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 16
The Mayor also asked about the status of the educational effort. Mr. Beynon said the new
staff person, who started working on March 25, 2002, is acclimating himself to the department's
processes. He will soon begin writing grants and should begin making educational presentations to
the schools in 30 to 45 days. Mayor Neal said that city staff will not be able to solve the animal
overpopulation problem by themselves but they and the Council have the responsibility of bringing
the necessary parties together to devise solutions.
Council Member Chesney asked Mr. Beynon several questions about carbon monoxide
versus lethal injection euthanasia, as well as operational issues. Mr. Beynon said that at the Animal
Control Department's current staffing and funding levels, nothing else can be done to improve the
city's euthanasia process. Mr. Chesney pointed out that during the Council retreat on March 15,
2002, Animal Control facility issues and improvements (including a study of the cost for euthanasia)
was selected as the top new initiative for 2002. He said he has also asked staff for information on
ways to answer the department's phones after 5 p.m. (even though the office remains open until 7
p.m. on weekdays). Mr. Beynon said that a phone recording is activated afier 5 p.m. because it would
be difficult for one staff member to handle the redemptions and adoptions in the office as well as
answer the five incoming lines. He said volunteers could be helpful in the center's operation as long
as they are consistently present.
Mr. Chesney asked how other cities are able to afford using lethal injection exclusively on
unwanted animals. Mr. Cruz-Aedo replied that up to this point, there has not been an interest by local
citizens to incur those costs. Mr. Chesney also asked about spaying and neutering efforts. Mr. Cruz-
Aedo said the city does not currently fund those activities. He said it did attempt such efforts in the
past but they were unsuccessful due to a lack of awareness of the program. He added that staff is
actively seeking grants and working with animal groups to address these issues. Mr. Cruz-Aedo said
staff's recommendation is to continue to transition to the use of lethal injection and they will ask the
Council to make specific decisions about that in the future.
Council Member Kinnison asked what changes would need to be made to the design of the
new Animal Control facility in order to accommodate lethal injection processes. Mr. Beynon replied
that the architects designed the building so both euthanasia methods can be used. He said the plan
was to move the actual carbon monoxide chamber to the new building. Mr. Garcia said he thinks the
city should retain the chamber in order to euthanize wild animals. He said staff will bring back
additional information and options for the Council to consider. Mr. Beynon noted that Corpus Christi
has an unusually large amount of wild animals that need to be euthanized.
Mr. Kinnison and Council Member Colmenero emphasized that the animal overpopulation
problem needs to be addressed by the community as a whole through education and responsible pet
ownership. Council Member Scott asked when the new facility will be open, and Mr. Beynon replied
that it should be operational in December 2002 or January 2003. Mr. Scott said he agrees that it
would he beneficial to lengthen the time that the phones are answered at the facility as well as to
open it on Saturdays. He said he thinks spaying and neutering is important. Mr. Beynon said staff
has done studies and determined that in certain neighborhoods, people will not allow their pets to
be spayed or neutered even if the service is free.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 17
Responding to Mr. Kinnison, Mr. Beynon said that a lot of dogs that are considered strays
are actually cared for to some extent, such as by people allowing them to eat out of their trash cans.
However, he said there is a very large population of feral cats and wild animals. Mayor Neal said
they are headed in the fight direction and the Council will give staff additional guidance once they
receive input from interested organizations.
Mayor Neal called for petitions from the audience.
Mr. Mark Yeats, 345 Cole, said he formed the Corpus Christi Association of Airport
Taxicabs (CCAAT). He said those taxi drivers pay $50 per month to work at the airport and he
estimates that they have contributed about $200,000 in the approximately 20 years that fee has been
in place. However, the drivers have not received anything in return, such as a designated parking
space. He said the purpose of the CCAAT is to improve the quality of service provided to persons
arriving at the Corpus Christi International Airport. He said the CCAAT members are concerned
about where their cabs will be located once the terminal reconstruction is completed. Mayor Neal
suggested that Mr. Yeats and the CCAAT take their concerns to the Airport Board.
The fourth presentation (Item 17) was regarding the proposed Corpus Christi Skate Park.
Using a computer presentation, Mr. Tony Cisneros, Director of Park and Recreation, explained that
about a year ago members of the South Texas Progressive Sports Association approached the
Council, the Commission on Children and Youth and the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee.
He said the two advisory groups endorsed the concept of a skate park in some form.
Mr. Cisneros said that factors to consider with a skate park include liability issues, supervised
versus unsupervised activity, location (noise complaints and hours of operation), and user groups
(skate boarders, in-line skaters, BMX bicycle riders). He then discussed the design elements of a
typical skate park, which is usually a concrete, in-ground facility that is surrounded by a fence and
is well-lit for after-dark use. It can also include a spectator area, parking lot, restrooms, office and
storage facility. He showed slides of three skate parks in Colorado (Denver, Boulder and Vans Park).
Mr. Cisneros said that possible locations for a skate park in Corpus Christi are: Bill Witt
Park, Corpus Christi Boys and Girls Club, Dr. H.P. Garcia Park, Labonte Park, South Bluff Park,
Swantner Park, and West Guth Park. He also showed several slides of the Portland (Texas) skate
park, which opened in January 2002 at a cost of about $370,000. He said the skate park has video
cameras with a direct feed into the Portland Police Department.
The Park and Recreation Director discussed funding options, including private funds, bond
funds, Community Development Block Grant funds (both reprogrammed and new project grants),
city's General Fund, state grant funds, and a combination of funding sources. Mr. Cisnems explained
that staff is seeking CDBG funds for a proposed new city recreation program--a city skate park
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 18
project. He said staff is recommending that the city partner with a recognized youth services
organization and skating and biking enthusiasts to develop it and pursue negotiations to lease the
Boys and Girls Club property, which is centrally located.
Council Member Longoria thanked Mr. Charlie Bryan, Executive Director of the Progressive
Sports Association, for his efforts to help develop a local skate park. He said they are trying to
identify a funding source and one possibility is CDBG funds. Deputy City Manager Noe said there
are two ways to qualify the skate park project: by the U.S. Depadment of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) declaring it eligible by virtue of the neighborhood in which it is located; or by
surveying users after the park is built to determine that 51% of them are of low or moderate income,
which would also qualify it. He said the latter option is somewhat risky because if that percentage
is not reached, some of the funds may have to be repaid. Mr. Noe said staff is pursuing the first
option and they hope to have an answer from HUD before the Council considers the CDBG grant
requests next month. Mr. Longoria said a skate park would greatly benefit local youth.
Mr. Bryan said he is a teacher and young people tell him every day that they do not have
anything to do. He said that providing a safe environment for skate boarders and in-line skaters will
have a dramatic impact on the community. He said they have been working on this project two years.
Council Member Scott asked about the difference between cement parks and modular parks.
Mr. Bryan said if a community plans to build an outdoor skate park, it is better to use cement because
in the long nm, outdoor modular parks have a huge cost associated with them for construction and
maintenance. He added that many modular parks are built by companies that make playground
equipment but are not necessarily suited for skating. He said it is preferable to use wood for indoor
parks. He said the local skating association is recommending a permanent outdoor skate park.
Council Member Kelly said that with regard to the Boys and Girls Club site, he thought there
was a prohibition against using public money on private land. Mr. Cisneros said that is why staff is
proposing that the city lease the property from that organization. He added that the programming of
the skate park would be separate from the Boys and Girls Club operation. Mr. Scott said he hopes
a decision can be made soon about the skate park.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 23, domestic preparedness program. There were no
comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
23.a. RESOLUTION NO. 024816
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a $280,000 grant from
the U.S. Depadment of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, in the No. 1050 Federal/State
Grants Fund for the purchase of specialized training equipment for hazardous materials
(HAZMAT), fire services, law enforcement, and emergency medical services (EMS)
personnel.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 19
The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Longoria absent.
23.b. ORDINANCE NO. 024817
Ordinance appropriating $280,000 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice
Programs, in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for the purchase of specialized mining
equipment for hazardous materials (HAZMAT), fire services, law enforcement and
emergency medical services (EMS) personnel.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Longoria absent.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 24, annexation ordinance. There were no comments
from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
24.a. M2002-089
Motion to amend the annexation calendar by changing the second reading date for the
annexation ordinance and the date of the City Council public heating and approval of zoning
fxom April 9, 2002 to April 16, 2002. The effective date of annexation is changed from April
10, 2002 to April 17, 2002.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Longoria absent.
24.b. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Ordinance annexing Padre and Mustang Island tracts: annexing 9,618 feet of Padre Island
Gulf beach frontage tracts owned by Jones, Walter & GLO (44.16 acres) and Padre Balli
Park (Nueces County Park No. 1), (194.92 acres and 6,324 feet of Gulf beach frontage on
Padre Island), in the vicinity of the Nueces-Kleberg county line; annexing Packery Channel
Park (Nueces County Park No. 2) and adjoining private land (approximately 50.01 total acres
for park and private land) on Padre Island; annexing 221 acres of land south of Mustang
Island State Park, comprising 4,211 feet of Gulf beach frontage on Mustang Island, owned
by Nueces County; annexing 9.23 acres of land north of Zahn Road and J.P. Luby Surf Park,
comprising 2,009.79 feet of Gulf beach frontage on Mustang Island, owned by Estate of Eric
C. Lower; providing that each annexed tract is contiguous to the city limits of the City of
Corpus Christi; providing for a service plan for the annexed tracts of land; providing that the
owners and inhabitants are entitled to all fights, privileges and burdens of other citizens and
property owners of the City of Corpus Christi and are subject to and bound by the City
Charter, ordinances, resolutions and rules; requiting application for certificate of occupancy
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 20
for nonconforming use; providing for amendment of the official maps of the City of Corpus
Christi, providing for an effective date.
Tract 1 - Jones. Walter and GLO Beach Frontages: Publicly and privately owned lands
comprising approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of Gulf beach frontage, from the south-
most property line of Padre Balli County Park to a point 500 feet south of the south-most
property line of the Lawrence Jones property. The width of the strip extends westward from
the city limit line on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above mean sea
level based on United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) and Geodetic Survey (G.S.)
datum of 1929, to a point along the vegetation line approximately 200 feet west of and
generally parallel to the 1.37-foot line above mean sea level Gulf of Mexico shoreline.
Tract 2 - Padre Balli Park: Nueces County Park No. 1 (Padre Balli Park) comprising
approximately 194.92 acres and 6,324 feet of Gulf beach frontage.
Tract 3- Packery Channel Park: Publicly and privately owned lands comprising
approximately 50.01 acres and including Nueces County Park No. 2 (Packery Channel Park).
Tract 4 - Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island State Park: Publicly owned tract of
land comprising 221.00 acres and 4,211 feet of Gulf beach frontage surrounded by the
existing city limits and out of the William Bryan Survey 606, between the east right-of-way
line of State Highway 361 and the existing city limit line along the Gulf of Mexico shoreline,
being the 1.374foot line above mean sea level based on the U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum of 1929.
Tract 5 - Beach Front Property_ North of Zahn Road: Privately owned (Eric C. Lower) tract
of land comprising approximately 9.23 acres and 2,009.79 feet of Gulf beach frontage
abutting the city limits on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above mean
sea level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum of 1929 and extending approximately 200 feet
westward, and between county-owned land and state-leased land at J.P. Luby Surf Park.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Longoria absent.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 25, golf feasibility study. There were no comments
from the audience. Responding to Council Member Kelly, Mr. Cisneros said it should take about 60
days to receive the analysis. Council Member Garrett asked how many times this action has been
taken. City Manager Garcia said that following the Council's last discussion about a new golf course,
the Council directed staffto determine whether there is a market for another golf course; if there is,
the second phase will be to choose a site. He said staffprepared and sent out requests for proposals
for a golf feasibility study and the successful proposer was National Golf Foundation Consulting Inc.
of Jupiter, Florida. He said staff is trying to move expeditiously on this project. He added that golf
surcharge funds can be used for this purpose.
Council Member Scott asked how long the second phase will take. Mr. Cisneros said that if
another golf course is warranted, the site analysis should take another 30 to 45 days. Responding to
Council Member Kinnison, Mr. Garcia said the golf course will be deemed feasible if it can make
money. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 21
25.a. ORDINANCE NO. 024818
Ordinance appropriating $23,000 from the Reserve for Capital Projects in Golf Fund No.
4690 for an area golf market analysis and feasibility study; mending Ordinance No. 024528
which adopted the FY2002 Operating Budget to increase appropriations by $23,000.
An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
25.b. M2002-090
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an area golf market analysis
and feasibility study contract in an amount not to exceed $23,000 with National Golf
Foundation Consulting Inc. of Jupiter, Florida.
The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett,
Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye."
Mayor Neal called for the City Manager's report. Mr. Garcia said that next Tuesday (April
2nd) the Council will have an all-day special meeting to fully review the capital improvement
program. The April 9th Council meeting has been canceled but the Park and Recreation Department
will be having a public heating that night in the Council Chambers regarding the park and recreation
master plan. Mr. Garcia also announced that the contractor abandoned the Omaha Street project and
staff is sending notices to the surrounding property owners to inform them about it. Mayor Neal
called for Council concerns and reports.
Mr. Chesney said he thought there would be an opportunity for public comment during the
April 2nd meeting. Mayor Neal replied that it will consist of presentations by staff and the public
will be able to attend the meeting or watch it on television but public comment will not be solicited.
Mr. Chesney asked that the residents on Chenoweth and Meadowbrook streets who had expressed
concerns about stormwater issues be informed of the stormwater master plan. He asked staff to
follow up with the citizens who expressed their concerns during the March 25th town hall meeting
and he said another one is scheduled for April 8th at Wilson Elementary School.
Mr. Chesney also said it is important to emphasize to people that when the Council considers
the marina development issue on April 23rd, they are simply deciding whether or not staff should
proceed with negotiations with Landry's Inc. He also discussed the importance of the Crime Control
District and he asked about a time flame for the Animal Control facility plan. Mr. Garcia said if the
Council approves the extra $200,000 for next year's budget, staff will begin implementation on
August 1, 2002. Mr. Chesney said he wanted staff to develop a general action plan for the Animal
Control facility, including a strategy for improved hours.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
March 26, 2002
Page 22
Mr. Chesney went on to say that he had asked Mr. Cisnems to have the Parks Board consider
his proposal to develop a "Friends of the Parks" group. He asked about a prohibition against Council
members appearing before Council boards and committees. City Secretary Chapa said the intent of
that policy is to prevent Council members from influencing committee members. The exception is
if a Council member has a personal issue he or she wants a committee to consider.
Mr. Garrett asked about a letter the Council received from Mr. John Torrey. MrJ Kinnison
said he sent a copy of that letter to Mr. Massey, who is working on it. Mr. Gareia said Mr. Torrey
had a suggestion about an innovative method to clean the beaches, but staffhas had difficulty getting
Mr. Torrey to demonstrate it because it is a proprietary machine for which he has a patent pending.
Mr. Noe said staffwill respond to Mr. Torrey's recent letter. He added that Mr. Torrey's proposal
is to take over the whole beach-cleaning operation at a substantially greater cost. He said staff
offered to let Mr. Torrey operate a pilot program to demonstrate his machine but that was not
acceptable to him.
Mr. Scott suggested that staffnotify the Cooper's Alley L-Head tenants about the upcoming
temporary closure of Cooper's Alley street. He also said he was told about the possibility of applying
for an air conditioning permit over the intemet. Mr. Noe said staffnow has the ability to use credit
cards to process those permits, which is a precursor to e-government services. Mr. Scott also asked
about the All American Cities award. Mr. Garcia said city staff has been told that the first step is to
organize a coalition to travel to Washington, D.C., to view the efforts of other cities before
attempting to apply for the award. Mr. Scott also commented on the cleanliness of Corpus Christi's
newly annexed beach areas. Mr. Garcia commended city staff for their efforts during the city's first
spring break in those areas.
Mr. Colmenero said the Council had received a letter from the mayor of a city in China
wishing to establish a relationship with Corpus Christi. Mr. Kinnison asked about a proposed ADA-
compliance project at the convention center. Mr. Noe said it can be incorporated as an additive
alternate if the Council decides not to include it in the CDBG program next month.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Pro Tem Chesney
adjourned the Council meeting at 6:45 p.m. on March 26, 2002.
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - 9:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr.
Council Member~:
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria*
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Staff:
City Manager David R. Garcia
Deputy City Manager George Noe
City Attorney James R. Bray Jr.
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Recording Secretary Rachelle Parry
ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem Brent Chesney
Mayor Neal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. City Secretary
Chapa called the roll and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter
officers were present to conduct the meeting. City Manager Garcia said the purpose of this meeting
is to provide detailed information to the Council about the capital improvement program (CIP) and
the capital budget. *Council Member Longoria arrived at 9:08 a.m.
Mayor Neal said that since this meeting was posted as a special meeting rather than as a
workshop, he will call for public comment after each presentation.
The first presentation was regarding the short-range and long-range CIP for the Water
Department (including the water supply element). Mr. Mark McDaniel, Director of Management and
Budget, gave an overview of the CIP, which staffhad presented to the Council during their annual
retreat on March 15, 2002. He said staffhas identified a funding plan for the three-year, short-range
CIP in the existing rate model (assuming 6% utility rate increases); however, the long-range CIP
does not have an identified funding plan. Mr. Garcia said that in addition to the extensive listing of
projects in the three-ring binder, staffhas also provided the Council with a prioritized enumeration
of the long-range CIP for both the combined utility system and future street needs.
Mr. Ed Garafia, Water Superintendent, discussed the Water Department projects. He noted
that in the short-range CIP, the southside transmission main (Phases 2-5) is the largest project,
comprising 46% of the total ($28.85 million). Mr. Garcia explained that about two years ago, the
southside of the city experienced a crisis of sorts with its water pressure. Consequently, the South
Staples Street pump station was moved ahead of schedule as a stop-gap measure pending the
progression of the southside transmission main project.
Mr. Garcia said the plan originally called for nmning a 36-inch main across the Laguna
Madre to Padre Island, which would have been very expensive. However, the Council directed staff
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 2
to explore the development of a desalination facility on the island so as to create a separate water
supply there. Mr. Garafia said that will eliminate the need for the water main crossing but a line still
needs to be extended to Flour Bluff. He added that that project will provide a more stable water
platform across the entire city, which was further discussed by Assistant City Manager Ron Massey.
Council Member Kinnison asked about changing the timing of some of the projects in order
to alter the rate model (i.e., reduce the need for 6% rate increases). Mayor Neal said that if the
Council is committed to the three-year funding plan provided by the rate model, projects can be
substituted but the overall cost would remain the same. However, he said it is a different issue if the
Council is not committed to the funding plan. Mr. McDaniel said that in order to lower the rate
model by 1%, about $8.4 million of projects will have to be eliminated in Year 1. And taking into
consideration the compounding effect, that equates to $21 million of projects in Year 10. There was
additional discussion of the short-range CIP water projects. With regard to the water supply short-
range CIP, Mr. McDaniel said the largest project is the Garwood pipeline at 49% ($10 million)
followed by the Rincon Bayou pipeline at 32% ($6.5 million).
Mr. McDaniel then discussed the water long-range CIP projects. He said traditional funding
sources include the "pay-as-you-go" CIP, commemial paper (on an interim basis), and revenue
bonds. Mr. Garafia said the largest of the long-range projects are the water treatment plants at 47%
($41 million) followed by Phases 6 and 7 of the southside transmission main at 28% ($24 million).
He also discussed the projects in the categories of distribution, pumping plants and other water
needs. Responding to Council members' questions, Mr. Garcia said that the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission (TNRCC) requires that when a community reaches 75% of its water and
wastewater capacity, it needs to have a firm plan in place to increase that capacity. While reviewing
the individual projects, Council members commented specifically about water service to customers
outside the city limits and the issue of the colonias.
Regarding the water supply long-range CIP, Mr. McDaniel said that traditional funding
sources include revenue bonds supported by the raw water charge component of the utility rates. He
noted that funding for the initial study phases of the Garwood pipeline and the Padre Island
desalination facility is included in the short-range CIP. Staff is in the process of evaluating
engineering proposals for feasibility studies for the projects. Upon completion of those studies, the
cost estimates and schedules will be refined for inclusion in the long-range CIP. The Garwood
pipeline constitutes 90% ($88 million) of that plan and the desalination facility is 10% ($10 million).
Additional discussion ensued about the raw water charge and the utility rate model.
Mayor Neal called for public comment about the water projects.
Mr. Bill Kopecky, 3609 Topeka, referred to the water long-range CIP. He said that in 1997
and 1998, 300,000 acre-feet of water was spilled due to rains the city could not capture because Lake
Corpus Christi was full and most of the rains were coming through the Nueces Basin. He asked the
Council to seriously consider constructing a pump station in the Simmons area or a water diversion
at Cotulla as a long-range water supply alternative to either delay or eliminate the need for the
Garwood pipeline.
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 3
Mr. Massey said city staffhas asked the Regional Water Planning Group to look at the issue
of optimization of the Nueces Basin. In addition to Mr. Kopecky's suggestions, another idea is to
build a two-way pipeline between Lake Corpus Christi and Choke Canyon Reservoir. Responding
to Council Member Scott, Mr. Garafia said the evaporation rate in those two reservoirs is large, as
are transportation losses. He said at their closest point (at Simmons), the Nueces River is about 10
miles from Choke Canyon.
Mr. Garcia said the Garwood pipeline and the desalination facility alone are not going to
solve Corpus Cbxisti's long-range water supply needs. He said the Council should have a wide range
of available options. Responding to Mayor Neal, City Attorney Bray said the Simmons plan was one
of 22 options in the Trans-Texas study in the early 1990s. Mr. Garcia said staffcould add the Cotulla
reservoir and the reservoir optimization study (including the estimated costs) to the city's long-range
water supply plan.
Mayor Neal said that in addition to the Garwood pipeline and the desalination facility, the
Council should also have information about piping the water from the Choke Canyon Reservoir to
a water treatment facility (as opposed to Lake Corpus Christi). Mr. Scott said there are people who
are opposed to that concept and Mayor Neal said future Councils will need to evaluate all of the
options. Mr. Garcia pointed out that the city now has a long-term water planner, Mr. Max Castefieda,
and staff can give the Council a presentation about the city's water planning strategy.
Council Member Kinnison suggested that the city consider partnering with other entities. Mr.
Garcia said staff is trying very hard to maintain the integrity of the city's water supply as a result of
attempts by other cities to utilize it as they face their own water crises. Mayor Neal said that having
a sufficient water supply is this community's number one issue.
The second presentation was regarding the Wastewater Department. Mr. Foster Crowell,
Wastewater Superintendent, explained that the city has six basins, service areas and treatment plants
which operate independently of each other. He noted that many of the projects are necessary to meet
the TNRCC's wastewater discharge permits, which regulate such things as effluent quality, plant
capacity, and basin treatment capacity. Mr. Crowell then described the many projects included in the
short-range CIP, with total programmed expenditures for the three years of $70.56 million.
Mayor Neal asked about the status of the downtown wastewater system. Mr. Crowell replied
that there have been several wastewater improvement projects in that area, including sliplining of
the Water Street trunk and ongoing inflow and infiltration issues. He said that overall, the downtown
area is doing well. Council Member Colmenero asked about the longevity of sliplined pipes. Mr.
Crowell said that in 1982 Corpus Christi started sliplining pipes as part of a pilot project and they
are still operating. He said the estimated life ofa sliplined pipe is 50 to 70 years. Mr. Crowell and
Mr. Escobar responded to other Council members' specific questions about certain projects and
general comments about the large number ofwastewater projects in relation to the amount of staff
(including engineers) needed to design and construct them.
! r ' I1
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 4
Mr. Crowell then discussed the wastewater long-range CIP projects, which are categorized
as follows: wastewater treatment plants - $131.8 million; lift stations and force mains - $17 million;
collection systems - $16.1 million; and other related wastewater needs - $16.73 million, for a grand
total of $181.6 million. City staff also responded to Council questions; there was no public comment.
The third presentation was about the Gas Department. Ms. Debbie Marroquin, Gas
Superintendent, explained that there are five separate gas systems: Corpus Christi (consuming 90%
of the gas); Calallen/Annaville (7% consumption); Padre Island; Country Creek; and farm taps on
Old Brownsville Road and Hwy. 44. She said that five of the seven short-range CIP projects pertain
to the southside gas transmission main. The first project (Part A), which involves crossing Oso Creek
at South Staples Street, is estimated to cost $1 million and will connect the Country Creek gas
system to the Corpus Christi system. The last two projects are for reservation fees and a compressed
natural gas station.
Ms. Marroquin also discussed the long-range CIP projects, the first three of which involve
additional phases of the southside gas transmission main totaling $6.5 million. The other two are for
reservation fees for years two and three for $1.4 million, for a grand total of $7.9 million. She said
their goals are to connect the gas systems as much as possible and to pursue a more competitive gas
supply contract. She then responded to Council members' questions. There were no comments from
the public.
The fourth presentation was made by Ms. Valerie Gray, Stormwater Superintendent. She
discussed the three main categories of projects in the short-range CIP: minor drainage improvements-
$1.13 million; bridge rehabilitation and replacement- $600,000; and rolled curb and gutter
replacement - $330,000. Staff members responded to questions from the Council and there was a
discussion about rolled curbs and gutters and drainage problems throughout the city.
Mr. Massey noted that the stormwater master plan, which is being developed, will set
drainage standards for neighborhoods. At that point, a determination can be made about how each
neighborhood measures up to the established standards. He said that eventually the city will improve
those areas but it will take much time and money to do so. Mayor Neal stated that any of the
stormwater long-range CIP projects can be moved into the short-range plan but it would be at the
expense of water projects under the city's current funding system. Additional discussion ensued
about the difficulty of funding stonnwater projects.
Mayor Neal suggested that the Council reread a March 8, 2002 memo from the City Manager
in which he forwarded the recommendations of the Stormwater Management Advisory Committee.
The Mayor asked staff to provide a presentation to the Council about those recommendations.
In response to Council members' questions, Ms. Gray discussed the waiting list for rolled
curb and gutter improvements. Mr. Garcia stated that the city requires developers to build drainage
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 5
ditches as part of the platting process. Mr. Escobar explained the Channel 31 pilot project and noted
that some communities, such as San Patricio, have created drainage districts which other
communities can utilize. He said the last major stormwater expenses were incurred as part of the
1986 bond program. Mr. Garcia said that cities throughout the state impose impact fees. Mr. Escobar
said that in the next few months, staff will begin bringing items to the Council related to the
stormwater master plan. Mayor Neal said the development community in Corpus Christi has always
resisted impact fees.
Mr. McDaniel then referred to the 39 stormwater long-range CIP projects, which total $66.8
million. He noted that those projects will be reprioritized once the results of the master plan are
obtained. Ms. Gray said the master plan may even add projects to the CIP. Responding to Council
Member Kelly, Ms. Gray said that Nueces County and other entities will be included in the master
plan discussions. She then delineated the long-range projects.
Mayor Neal said that areas south of South Padre Island Drive drain into the Cayo del Oso and
Oso Creek and he asked about permitting standards for those areas. Mr. Massey said the master plan
should identify the areas that probably should not be developed because of environmental concerns.
A discussion ensued about the quality of stormwater runoff. The Mayor commented that the city is
now paying the price for very poor stormwater planning in the 1960s and the future development of
the city is directly tied to stormwater issues. There were no comments from the audience.
The fifth presentation was regarding the utility rate model. Mr. McDaniel said the model
currently indicates a continued need for a 6% base rote increase per year beyond the short-range CIP
for all the utilities (not including the increase for the raw water charge). He said the model is
intended to support a 25% working capital (25% of expenditures) for the combined utility system,
which has been set as a policy issue and is considered by the bond rating agencies. He said at this
point it assumes the inclusion of the entire short-range and long-range CIP as of January 2002. The
Budget Director then showed a graph of utility rate adjustments since 1975. He said the average rate
increases for water, wastewater and gas were approximately 4%, 8% and 3% respectively.
Mr. McDaniel said that each 1% increase in the base utility rates in FY02-03 will generate
the following (approximate figures): $761,766 in revenue; $8.4 million in capital improvement
project capacity in Year 1 of the short-range CIP (FY02-03); $9.5 million in capacity in Year 1 of
the long-range CIP (FY04-05); and $21 million in capital improvement capacity by Year 10 (FY11-
12). He pointed out that the model is a planning tool that has very many variables, such as inflation
rates. He said every year it is reviewed and updated.
Mr. Kinnison said the utility rate model includes every project in both the short-range and
long-range programs. He said he would like staff to develop a rate model with 3% utility rate
increases and then determine the amount of funding that will be available. He said at that point the
Council can determine what projects will "fall out" and not be funded.
Mr. Garcia said the simplest thing to do is to drop offthe unfunded stormwater projects,
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 6
which total $66 million. However, he said the implication of not raising the utility rates 6% is that
if the Council wishes to fund those projects in the future, a much mom substantial rate increase will
be needed. He said staffcan provide all that information to the Council.
Mayor Neal said staff should determine a dollar amount rather than pinpointing projects. He
added that the short-range projects should continue to be funded. Mr. Garcia said many of the
projects are linked together and, as certain areas are cut back, they commit to a course of action that
has long-range implications. He said if the Council is considering cutting back to 3% rate increases
in next year's budget (FY02-03), that will impact projects that are currently underway.
Mr. Scott said staff needs to illustrate the long-term effect of lesser rate increases. Mr.
Longoria said he thinks the trend has been for Councils and the general public to be more critical of
6% rate increases and he suggested that instead, staff should budget for lesser amounts. He added
that staff should also show how different rate increases will affect a typical utility bill. Mr.
Colmenero asked staff to also consider other funding options. Mr. Noyola said there are many people
on fixed incomes who would be adversely affected by a 6% rate increase. Mr. Kinnison said the
Council can lay the ground work and plan ahead for future projects and future bond elections. There
were no comments from the audience on the utility rate model.
Mayor Neal recessed the meeting at approximately 1:25 p.m. so the Council could attend the
funeral of Council Member Chesney's father.
The Mayor reconvened the Council meeting at approximately 3:20 p.m. The sixth
presentation was regarding public facilities. Mr. McDaniel pointed out that staff would be focusing
on the long-range CIP projects for public facilities, public health and safety, airport, parks and
recreation, and streets since the short-range CIP is made up almost entirely of utility projects (which
have already been discussed). He said that traditional fimding sources for public facilities programs
include bond funds (general obligation, sales tax, and hotel/motel tax) and CDBG funds.
Mr. Kevin Stowers, Assistant Director of Engineering Services, said there are five public
facilities projects in the long-range CIP totaling $9.9 million: northwest branch library expansion;
new southside branch library; Memorial Coliseum improvements; "Doc" McGregor photograph
collection storage facility; and a marine archeology laboratory. He said the short-term CIP projects
(including the multipurpose arena and the convention center expansion) are well underway.
Mr. Kinnison asked about the Memorial Coliseum project. Mr. Stowers said that a decision
has not yet been made about the functionality of the coliseum, particularly since the arena is not
completed. Deputy City Manager Noe pointed out that the city has a lease with the IceRays hockey
team for the use of the coliseum. The lease has a five-year renewal option and staff intends to
negotiate for the IceRays to use the arena instead. Mr. Garrett asked about the Workforce
Development roof waterproofing, and Mr. Stowers said that contract, which is being funded with
CDBG monies, has already been awarded. Mr. Garrett commented that that building (the old Police
Depas'tment headquarters) has had water leaks for many years. There were no public comments.
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 7
The seventh presentation was about the public health and safety projects. Mr. McDaniel said
that traditional funding sources are general obligation and sales tax bonds, State Infrastructure Bank
loans, and the Padre Island tax increment financing district. Mr. Stowers said the long-range CIP
includes some continuing projects that were in the 2000 Bond issue, such as Phase 2 of the public
safety training facility ($10 million). Other future projects are: a fire station in the area of Yorktown
Boulevard between Rodd Field Road and the Cayo del Oso - $1.5 million; Annaville fire station -
$1.5 million; Police headquarters expansion (Phases 1 and 2)- $1.8 million; and four police
substations - $2.5 million, for a total of $17.3 million.
Mr. Stowers also referred to the ongoing short-range public health and safety projects. He
said staff is working on land acquisition for Phase 1 of the police and fire training facility;
advertising for the Mustang Island fire substation project will be advertised on April 15th; fire station
ADA compliance and coed improvements are underway; the Health Department roof repair has been
completed; the contract for the construction of the new Animal Control facility has been awarded;
the seawall, sidewalk and marina bulkhead improvements are currently being advertised for bids;
the Elliott Landfill project is under construction; the Packery Channel project is moving forward;
and the JFK Causeway elevation is also underway. Staff then responded to Council members'
questions, including some regarding the police substations and fire stations. There were no
comments from the public.
The eighth presentation was regarding the airport long-range projects. Mr. McDaniel said that
traditional funding sources include Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants, passenger facility
charges, airport revenue bonds and airport capital reserves. He said that future airport capital
improvement projects are dependent on FAA grants and discretionary funding.
Mr. Dave Hamrick, Aviation Director, said many of the CIP projects are demand-driven in
accordance with the recently received airport master plan. He then described the long-range projects,
which are categorized as follows: runway extension - $28.09 million; land acquisition - $11.71
million; airfield drainage - $4.1 million; airfield rescue - $2.85 million; taxiway improvements-
$1.93 million, and other projects - $2.65 million, for a total of $51.33 million.
Mayor Neal asked about a project in the current year known as the landside roadway system-
entrance road reconstmctinn. Mr. Stowers replied that staffplans to open bids on April 22nd for the
loop road portion and parking lot improvements. He said the entrance road component itself has been
deferred to the future. Mr. Hamrick said he does not think it will be too far in the future, which he
explained. The Mayor also asked about a possible joint facility usage. Mr. Hamrick said subsequent
to the Mayor's request, he has drafted a lease for the Coast Guard, which is interested in relocating
to the airport. Mayor Neal also commented on the importance of homeland security and Corpus
Chfisti's proximity to the Gulf of Mexico. Additional discussion ensued about the entrance road and
the joint use airport issues. There were no comments from the audience.
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 8
The ninth presentation was regarding park and recreation projects. Mr. McDaniel said that
traditional funding sources include general obligation bonds, park trust funds, CDBG funds, state
or interagency grants, and street assessment appropriations. He said the long-range C1P will be
further refined pending the completion of the parks master plan, which is estimated to occur in the
summer of 2002.
Mr. Stowers said these programs also receive monies from the Golf Course Fund, Marina
Fund and General Fund. He said the long-range CIP includes improvements in the following areas:
golf courses - $10 million; aquatic facilities - $8.78 million; parks - $7.98 million; marina - $5.5
million; neighborhood park playgrounds - $5 million; beaches - $2.4 million; park maintenance
facilities - $1.09 million; recreation centers - $615,000; tennis centers - $495,000; and other -
$605,000, for a total of $42.46 million.
Mr. Kinnison requested that the new southside senior center be included in the short-range
program and he inquired about the marina improvements, to which Mr. Tony Cisneros, Director of
Park and Recreation, responded. Mayor Neal asked about the marina dredging project. Mr. Stowers
said it is a Texas General Land Office project, which he further described. Mr. Massey added that
despite the GLO project, there is a need for long-term marina dredging.
Mr. Longoria asked Mr. Kelly about the CIP project for Labonte Park. Mr. Kelly said that
park is where all the soccer and intramural sports are played in the northwest area. Mr. Stowers said
any infrastructure at Labonte Park will be flood resistant; however, most of the improvements will
be for underground utilities. Mr. Noyola asked about the timing of the Garcia athletic fields
renovation and the West Oso High School tennis courts renovation. Mr. Cisneros said there are many
park and recreation projects in the long-range CIP and not enough money to pay for them. He said
part of the problem is deferred maintenance, which is also caused by a lack of funding. Mr. Garcia
added that West Oso High School is located in a CDBG-eligible area.
Mr. Scott referred to the short-range CIP, saying that one of the baseball leagues is concemed
that the irrigation system project is being done during baseball season. Mr. Cisneros replied that it
is simply a function of needing to get the projects done. A discussion ensued. Mr. Colmenero asked
about projects at the senior centers and the HEB tennis center, and Mr. Garrett asked about South
Bluff Park and the out-of-service fire station on Louisiana Parkway, to which staffresponded. There
was no public comment.
The tenth and last presentation was regarding street projects. Mr. McDaniel explained that
after the capital budget/planning guide was distributed, staff updated the streets long-range CIP,
including adding some new projects (with pending cost estimates). Mr. Stowers said the future street
needs are not fimded at this time but will be through the next bond issue. He said staff has made
recommendations about the priority of those projects, which are categorized under new construction,
reconstruction and other street-related construction. Mr. Massey explained that new construction
expands capacity, whereas reconstruction takes an existing road and increases its longevity.
Minutes - Special Council Meeting
April 2, 2002 - Page 9
Responding to Mayor Neal, Mr. McDaniel said the preliminary estimate for the streets long-
range CIP is $125.39 million, but that does not include some of the new projects. Mr. Massey said
the timing of some of those projects depends on how much money is invested in street maintenance
each year. He added that Metropolitan Planning Organization funding is tied up for the next three
years. Mr. Garcia said the estimates do not include utility costs. Mr. David Seiler said many of the
city's streets have needed additional capacity and improvements for quite some time.
Mayor Neal suggested that staff develop a debt model for a bond election in 2004. Mr.
McDaniel said that beginning in 2009, the city will have a debt capacity of $98 million (assuming
a 3% growth in valuations). Ms. Barbara Dolce, Street Superintendent, described the city's pavement
management program and Mr. Escobar further described the difference between new construction
and reconstruction projects.
Mr. Kinnison referred to a future bond program for streets, saying the Council should let the
citizens decide how much debt they think they can handle in order to accomplish these overdue
projects. Mr. Garcia said the street cost estimates are linked to the utility rate numbers. Mr. Escobar
pointed out that with the Bond 2000 projects, for every $1 of street work, construction crews are
having to do $1 of utility work. Consequently, there is $20 million of utility work associated with
the $20 million in street work approved by the voters. Staff members fmther responded to Council
members' questions about specific street projects. There were no comments from the public.
In conclusion, Mayor Neal referred to a chart showing the impact of proposed rate increases
on an average residential utility bill. He said that information needs to be disseminated. Mr.
McDaniel said the reason the utility bill itself does not increase by 6% is because the raw water
charge increase is only 3% and because solid waste fees (which are also included) are not changing.
Mr. Garcia said that on April 30th, staff will bring back the detailed analysis the Council requested.
The Mayor said it is important that the Council and staff initiate an intensive community
informational program about the meaning of"debt." He said debt that is properly incurred, financed
and approved for a good purpose improves the quality of life in cities. He said the presentations
made at this meeting illustrate the consequences of not investing in the city's infrastructure.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Neal adjourned the
Council meeting at 5:27 p.m. on April 2, 2002.
a. AIRPORT BOARD - Four (4) vacancies with three-year terms to 4-04-05.
COMPOSITION
Ten (10) members appointed by the City Council for three-year terms. All members shall
serve for three-year staggered terms. Members must be residents of Corpus Christi.
MEMBERS TERM
ORIGINAL
APPTD. DATE
* Jerry Kane, Chairman
** Abel Alonzo
Ramiro Gamboa
Mark Meyer
J. E. Rehler
* Frank "Rocco" Montesano
Ed Hicks, Sr.
Nelda Martinez
Chuck Cazalas
* Willard Hammonds, Sr.
4-04-02 4-27-99
4-04-02 4-27-99
4-04-04 4-14-98
4-04-03 10-13 -98
4-04-04 4-14-98
4-04-02 2-22-00
4-04-03 2-16-99
4-04-03 12-14-99
4-04-04 4-14-98
4-04-02 4-27-99
* Seeking reappointment
** Not seeking reappointment
ATTENDANCE RATE OF MEMBERS INTERESTED IN REAPPOINTMENT
NO. OF MTGS.
NAME THIS TERM
NO. % OF ATTENDANCE
PRESENT LAST TERM YEAR
Jerry Kane, Chairman
Frank "Rocco" Montesano
Willard Hammonds, Sr.
8 4 50%
8 8 100%
8 6 75%
NO TE : Jerry Kane was not able to attend meetings on a regular basis due to some medical
problems. He feels that be will now be able to comply with the attendance requirements.
OTHER INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST
Louis Alvarado
Realtor/New Construction Representative, Martin
Agency Realtors. Professional and community
activities include: Kiwanis Club, C.C. Board of
Realtors, Public Relations Director for Quetzal
Theatre Group, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and
Hispanic Contractors Association. (10-01-01)
04-16-02.wpd, p. 1
J.C. Ayala
Robert Broadway
Douglas R. Dunn
John E. Dunn
Steven Hall, Ph.D.
David Hayek
MikeT. Johnson
04-16-02.wpd, page 2
Owner/Travel Agent, Let's Travel & Fiesta Vacations.
Member of the Chamber of Commerce and Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce. Awarded a Certificate of
Achievement from the Mexico Ministry of Tourism.
(4-O6-O2)
Refinery Services Manager, Valero Refining
Company. Graduate of University of Corpns Christi
with major studies in History. Past president, current
member of Executive Committee and Board of
Governors for the United Way of the Coastal Bend.
Founding Chairman of the Coastal Bend Workforce
Development Board. Member of City's Board of
Adjustment. Chairman Elect of the YMCX4-11-02)
Center Director, University of the Incarnate Word
(Del Mar campus). Holds a Master's degree in Public
Administration. Member of the Rotary International
Club. Has received numerous personal and unit
awards during Coast Guard career. (1-30-02)
Retired civil servant (GS 13). Professional and
community activities include: Mayor's Council on
Senior Citizen Affairs, former member of Park and
Recreation Advisory Committee and ACOA member.
Special recoguitions include: Chairman ofthe Human
Relation Council for Defense Communication Agency
in Washington, D.C. and President of the National
Association of Government Engineers. (7-25-01)
Professor of Accounting, Texas A&M- Corpus
Christi. B.B.A., M.B.A. and Ph.D. in Accounting.
C.P.A. and a certified Government Financial
Manager. Active with the Westside Business
Association and the Texas Jazz Festival Society. (3-
25-02)
Production Manager for Occidental Chemical
Corporation. A.A. from Del Mar College, B.S. in
Aerospace engineering from Texas A&I University,
Board Member Padre Soccer League. (3-27-02)
Administrator, Christus Spohn Hospital South. Vice-
President, Christus Spohn Health System. M.P.A. in
Robert T. Lacy, Sr.
Glenn E. Lyons
Grandis Lenkin
John Maceda
Bums W. McRee
04-16-02.wpd, page 3
Public Administration, Texas Tech University.
Certified Registered Nurse and Licensed Nursing
Facility Administrator. Professional activities
include: Diplomat, American College of Healthcare
Executives - Regional Advisory Board and American
College of Healthcare Administrators. (4-01-02)
Retired Ford dealer - 31 years. Community Activities
include: Board member of Crime Stoppers and
Beautify Corpus Christi. Past President of the Coastal
Bend Car Dealers. Active with the Robstown Lions
Club, Ford Advertising Board, and the Better
Business Bureau. (4-09-02)
Area of expertise - Development and marketing.
Director of Padre Island Business Association Board
and Director of the Karen E. Hemy Foundation.
Served ten years in United States Air Force Security
Service, Top Secret security clearance. (2-11-00)
Vice-President of International Bank of Commerce.
Community activities include: Kidney Foundation,
Boy Scouts of America, United Way, Salvation Army,
American Cancer Society, American Heart
Association, USO of South Texas and the Navy
League. Awarded the Yellow Rose of Texas from
Governor Bush and the Silver Beaver Award from the
Boy Scouts. Also a member of the Landmark
Commission - willing to resign if appointed. (3-2 7-02)
Vice-President of Administration and Marketing, Ray
West Warehouses, Inc. B.F.A. from McMurry
University, Abilene, TX. Community activities
include: 2002 President of the Corpus Christi
Transportation Association. Fifteen years experience
in all aspects of airport management and airport
operations. Professional activities include: Executive
candidate of American Association of Airport
Executives and member of the AAAE National,
Administration and Finance Comnfittees. (3-27-02)
Principal Broker/Owner, Gulftex Properties. Member
of the C.C. Association of Realtors TREPAC
Committee. Has been an active Real Estate broker in
ClifMoss
Govind Nadkarni
James A. Needham
Allan Potter
MaryHelen Salazar
04-16-02.wpd, page 4
South Texas for over 25 years. Holds both the CPM
and CCIM designations, the only broker south of San
Antonio to do so. (5-11-01)
Retired. Former City Councilman. Member of the
Transportation Advisory Committee and the Nueces
County Tax Appraisal District. Willing to resign fi.om
the Transportation Advisory Committee if appointed.
(S-2~-02)
Owner, Govind and Associates. B.S. in Civil
Engineering, Guajarat University; M.S. in Civil
Engineehng, University of Southern California.
Member of National Society of Professional
Engineers and American Society of Civil Engineers.
Graduate of Leadership Corpus Christi, Class 13.
Received National Outstanding Businessman of the
Year Award fi-om Texas Association of Minority
Business Enterprises. (2~03-00)
Coordinator of Programs, Texas A&M- Corpus
Christi. Serves as a liaison between Texas A&M
University System and South Texas business,
industry, government, trade organizations and
professional groups. B.S. and M.S. in Construction
Management; Ph.D. in Architecture. Member of
Local Emergency Planning Committee, United Way,
Air Quality Committee and North Bay Community
Advisory Committee. (1-26-00)
Attorney-at-Law, Self-employed. B.A., Baylor
University; J.D., Baylor Law School. Member of
Texas Bar Association, C.C. Bar Association,
Airplane & Pilots Owners Association, National
Business Air Association. Holds an Aircraft Pilot
License (Multi-Engine & Single Engine Commercial).
(S-20-O2)
Owner, SS Structure, Inc.; Co-Owner, S & S Painting
& Drywall Company. Associate's degree in
Marketing, Del Mar College. 1999 President of
LULAC Council No. 1. Past member of Minority
Contractors Council, South Texas Minority Coalition
Organization and Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.
Wilson B. "Bill" Stewart
Gonzalo Tamez
Raul Torres
Ronald B. Wheaton
Current member of Westside Business Association.
(2-01-00)
Retired, Federal Aviation Administration. B.S. in
Business Management. Served as Air Traffic
Manager at the C.C. International Airport and Air
Traffic HUB Manager for South Texas (Harlingen,
Brownsville and McAllen). Previously served on
Airport Advisory Board fi.om 6/95 to 4/98. (3-14-02)
Lieutenant, Corpus Christi Police Department, A.A.
fi-om Del Mar College, B.A. fi.om Corpus Christi
State University, M.A. fi.om Corpus Christi State
University, Real Estate Brokers License fi-om the
State of Texas, Member of LULAC, served as
president for three terms, served as vice-president for
two terms, and trustee for two terms. (3-15-02)
Self-employed, C.P.A. Member of Texas Society of
C.P.A.s and volunteers with Head Start. M.B.A. fi.om
Texas A&M - CC. (2-17-00)
President, BMW Engineering, Inc. B.S. from
Michigan State University. Licensed by Texas State
Board of Professional Engineers (mechanical
engineer). (4-19-00)
04-16-02.wpd, page 5
SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - One vacancy with term to 9-02. (Since the term is set to
expire shortly, it is recommended that Council reappoint the new appointee to a term
ending 9-05).
COMPOSITION
It shall consist of a Steering Committee of twenty-one members and various subcommittees,
members who shall be broadly representative of the racial, religious and ethnic groups in the
community. The members shall be appointed by the City Council and shall serve three-year
terms or until their successors are appointed and qualified. The Steering Committee shall
be responsible for the overall administration and implementation of the city's Sister City
program. There shall be a subcommittee for each sister city authorized by Resolution of the
City Council. Members of each subcommittee shall be appointed by the Steering Committee
plus members from the community at large as deemed necessary and sufficient by the
Steering Committee. The offices of the committee shall consist of a General Chairman,
Vice-Chairman for each of the Sister City subcommittees established in accordance with Sec.
2-152. The Chairman and each Vice-Chairman shall be elected by majority vote of the Sister
City Committee annually.
MEMBERS TERM
ORIGINAL
APPTD. DATE
Sue Dulaney, Chairperson 9-04 9-8-98
Yaiee Shih, Vice-Chairperson 9-02 10-21-97
Edna Balboa 9-04 9-11-01
Mufid A. Abudiab 9-02 10-10-00
* Blanca Becerra 9-02 9-28-99
Lucy Reta 9-02 9-10-96
Gary Hansen 9-04 9-10-96
Dine Combs 9-02 12-14-99
Mannti Cummins 9-04 9-11-01
Marvin Davis 9-04 6-13-00
Ann Jaime 9-02 6-13 -00
Rose Gunji 9-04 9-09-97
Wayne Bennett 9-04 9-11-01
Raquel Madrigal 9-04 6-13-00
Melody Cooper 9-02 5-08-01
Judy Benkendorfer 9-03 10-10-00
Danielle Pearrell 9-03 7-11-00
JoAnn Canales 9-03 10-31-00
Jesfis Rosales 9-03 10-10-00
John Wright 9-03 10-10-00
Frances Powell 9-03 5-08-01
* Resigned
04-16-02.wpd, page 6
INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST
Albert Allen
Retired Assistant Fire Chief. Owner o fCissi's Flower
Shop. Seeking opportunity to learn about different
cultures. (9-16-00)
Regis Barber
President/CEO, South Texas Lighthouse for the Blind.
Received B.A. from OLS College and M.A. for St.
Mary's University. Regional representative for the
General Council of Industries for the Blind and
member of the West Corpus Christi Rotary Club.
(3-23-00)
Randy Farrar
Home Builder. B.B.A. in Accounting, Texas A&M
University. Activities include: First Vice President
of Builders Association, member of Building Code
Task Force, and 2000 Chairman of Parade of
Homes. (2-16-00)
Ellen MunT
Loan Officer, Centex Home Equity. M.A. from Texas
A&M - College Station. Community activities
include KEDT Television and Radio Community
Advisory Board and Downtown Rotary. Has 15 years
experience in board and non-profit management. Has
traveled and worked extensively in Africa, Europe,
the Mideast and Central America. (3-20-02)
Robert Vaughan
Self-employed. B.S. in Computer Science. Received
recognition from Mayor Mary Rhodes. Believes city
should be more familiar with different cultures.
(9-14-00)
Elaine A. Yellen
Assistant Professor of Nursing, Texas A&M
University-Corpus Christi. Ph.D. in Nursing. Active
volunteer with St. Bartholomew's Church. Member
of Texas Nurses Association - local chapter. (1-23-01)
04-16-02.wpd, page 7
c. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Three (3) vacancies with three-
year terms to 4-30-05.
COMPOSITION
Nine (9) members appointed by the City Council for three-year terms to provide advice on
transportation and traffic safety matters. One member has traditionally been the incumbent
security officer at the Naval Air Station. Elects its own Chairman and Vice-Chairman
annually. Meets 4th Monday of the month, at 2:00 p.m., City Hall, Council Chambers.
MEMBERS TERM
ORIGINAL
APPTD. DATE
Anthony Alejandro, Chairman 4-30-04
* Stuart Sher, Vice-Chairman 4-30-02
Robbie Foster 4-30-04
* Grace M. Gonzalez 4-30-02
Israel Ybarra 4-30-04
Orlando Noyola 4-30-03
ClifMoss 4-30-03
Don Davenport 4-30-03
* MAC Karla Bennett (NAS Security Officer) 4-30-02
4-28-98
2-17-98
4-11-00
2-13-01
9-10-96
5-27-97
1-23 -96
1-11-00
5-27-97
* Seeking reappointment
ATTENDANCE RATE OF MEMBERS INTERESTED IN REAPPOINTMENT
NAME
NO. OF MTGS.
THIS TERM
NO. % OF ATTENDANCE
PRESENT LAST TERM YEAR
Stuart Sher, Vice-Chair
Grace M. Gonzalez
MAC Karla Bennett (NAS)
10 9 90%
10 8 80%
10 8 80%
OTHER INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST
Dale D. Berry
Director of Development, Texas A&M-Kingsville.
B.A. from Howard Payne University. Member of
Beautify Corpus Christi, South Texas Area Rides
Association and the Association of Fund Raising
Professionals. Would like to serve as an advocate for
bike lanes. (1-24-02)
William J. Green
Project Manager, Goldston Engineering. Received
04-16-02.wpd, page 8
Mike Patterson
Raul Torres
B.S. at Rice University. Member of T.S.P.E.,
A.S.C.E., S.A.M.E. and a former member of the City
Manager's Career Development Center. (6-01-01)
Assistant Director of Transportation, CCISD. Holds
a B.S. in Criminal Justice and M.B.A. Established
special needs transportation within CCISD in 1996.
(1-2S-01)
C.P.A. with a B.B.A. and M.B.A. from Texas A&M
University in Corpus Christi. Member of Texas
Society of CPA's and American Management
Association and the Head Start Program. (6-07-01)
04-16-02.wpd, page 9
'1 ~ ' ['
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving a supply agreement with Altivia, Houston, Tx. for
approximately 415 tons of sodium chlorite solution in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0065-
02 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $234,060. The term of the supply
agreement will be for twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month
periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have
been budgeted in FY 01-02 by the Water Department.
BACKGROUND:
Purpose:
Sodium chlorite solution is used in the treatment of potable (drinking)
water. This chemical reacts with chlorine to form chlorine dioxide,
which is used to remove unpleasant taste and odor from the water. It
is also used as a disinfectant agent against "disease causing"
organisms.
Previous Contract:
The option to extend the current contract was exercised requiring new
bids to be received.
Bid Invitations Issued: Eleven
Bid Received: Three
Price Analysis:
Pricing has decreased approximately 12% from the previous bid of
1999. At the time of the extension last year, pricing was stable.
Award Basis: Low Bid
Funding:
O. N. Stevens Water Plant
520010-4010-31010
$270,000
Mich~Uel'B arrera,XC?. M.
Procurement and General Services Manager
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BID TABULATION
BID INVITATION NO: BI-0065-02
SODIUM CHLORITE SOLUTION
QUANTITY: 4'15 TONS
BUYER: ESTHER C. BARRERA
VENDOR
UNIT PRICE
PER TON
TOTAL
1 ALTIVIA
HOUSTON, TX.
Mfg:Altivia
Min Qty: 4500 gallons
Lead time: 48 hours
$564.00
$234.060.00
2
VULCAN CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA.
Mfg: Vulcan Chemicals
Min Qb/: 4000 gallons/40,000 lbs.
Lead Time: 5-7days
$569.00
$ 236,135.00
3
INTERNATIONAL DIOXCIDE, INC.
NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI
Mfg: international Dioxcide, Inc.
Min Qty: 44,000 lbs
Lead Time: 2-3 days
$588.00
$244,020.00
4
! ' [
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
RECOMMEDATION: Motion approving the purchase of one (1) line jetting truck from the
Houston-Galveston Area Council of Government (HGAC), for the total amount of $79,009.02. The
award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with HGAC. This vehicle will be used by
the Wastewater Department. Funds are available from the FY 01-02 Capital Outlay Budget. This
item will be an addition to the fleet.
BACKGROLrND:
Purpose:
This vehicle will be used by the Wastewater Department to clean and clear
blockages in the smaller diameter waste water lines.
Award Basis:
The purchase is made through the cooperative purchasing agreement with
Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments. HGAC acts as a
purchasing agent for participating members through the Inter-local
Cooperation Act and abides by all Texas statutes regarding competitive
bidding requirements.
This type of vehicle is not under contract through any other cooperative
purchasing agreement available to the City.
Price History:
The City purchased a similar vehicle in 2001 for a cost of $78,922.49.
Funding:
Wastewater - Line Item 178
550020-5110-40110
$80,000
Micl~ei"B~xrr er a,XC .~ M
Procurement & General Services Manager
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the purchase of four mowers and one sand trap
rake in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0057-02 from AMC Industries, San Antonio,
Texas based on low bid for a total of $109,018.80. All items are replacement units. Funding is
available in the FY01-02 Capital Outlay Fund.
Purpose:
The mowers will be used by the Park & Recreation
Department on City Golf Courses. The equipment includes
two greens mowers, two turf mowers and one sand trap
rake.
Bid Notices Issued:
6
Bid Invitations Received:
2
Basis of Award:
Low Bid
Price Comparison:
The City last purchased a similar greens mower in 1999 for
a total price of $13,984. The City has not recently
purchased a turf mower or sand trap rake of the
configuration specified.
Maintenance Services
550020-5110-40110
$115,000
Capital Outlay Item Nos. 129,130,131
134and 135.
Micha'~arrer~a, ~.p.M.
Procurement & General Services Manager
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BUYER: Michael Barrera
BID TABULATION BI-057-02
GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT
~,MC Industries Professional Turf Produc;~s
San Antonio, Texas San Antonio, Texas
Unit I Extended Unit I Extended
Item Description Qty. Price Price Price Price
1 Triplex Greens-Mower 2 $15,357.80 $ 30,718.60 $18,489.00 $ 36,978.00
2 7-Gang self propelled Turf Mower 2 35.388,40 70.776.80 38,100.00 76,200.00
3 Sand Trap Rake, Self-Propelled I 7526.40 9,763.00 9,763.00
Grand Total $ 109,018.80
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
RECOMMEDATION: Motion approving the purchase often (10) sedans from the Houston-
Galveston Area Council of Government (HGAC), for the total amount of $146,781.50. The award
is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with HGAC. These vehicles will be used by the
Police Department. Funds are available through the Law Enforcement Block Grant. These items
are replacements to the fleet.
BACKGROUND:
Purpose:
These unmarked police vehicles will be used by the Police Department's
undercover section.
Award Basis:
The purchase is made through the cooperative purchasing agreement with
Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments. HGAC acts as a
purchasing agent for participating members through the Inter-local
Cooperation Act and abides by all Texas statutes regarding competitive
bidding requirements.
These type of vehicles can be purchased from the Texas Local Government
Purchasing Cooperative through an Austin based Ford Dealer. However, the
cost is 2% higher than pricing through HGAC.
Price History:
The City purchased similar vehicles in 200 t for a cost of $14,599.30.
Funding:
Police - Line Item 217 A
550020-1050-820801
Micl~el'Barrera, C~ P/~IVI~
Procurement & General Services Manager
$150,000
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 024528 which adopted the FY 2001-2002
budget to authorize purchase of additional fire truck through lease purchase program; and declaring an
emergency.
Motion approving the lease purchase of two aerial fire trucks from the Houston-Galveston Area Council of
Government (HGAC), for the total amount of $1,295,922.82. The award is based on the cooperative
purchasing agreement with HGAC. Funds have been budgeted in the FY01/02 Capital Outlay List. These
items are replacement upgrades and will be used by the Fire Department.
Purpose:
The two aerial fire trucks will be used by the Fire Department to fight fires in
high story buildings and large residential homes. These will be replacement
upgrades.
The Fire Department has one aerial fire truck in the current budget to be lease
purchased. However, the estimated lead-time for delivery of the track is
estimated to be between 270 and 300 days. As payment for the truck is not
approved until after delivery and inspection is made of the vehicle, the City will
not begin to make payments on the lease until FY 02-03. Additionally, by
ordering the two trucks as a package, the City will receive a $30,000 discount
off the quoted price. Therefore, staff is recommending amending the current
year's budget to add one additional truck. Although the City will be obligated
to fund the two trucks over the five year lease purchase period, the award will
not have a financial impact on this year's budget.
Award Basis:
The equipment will be purchased through the cooperative purchasing agreement
with Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments. HGAC acts as a
purchasing agent for participating members through the Inter-local Cooperation
Act and abides by all Texas statutes regarding competitive bidding
requirements. These trucks are not under contract through any other
cooperative available to the City.
Price Comparison
The City purchased a similar aerial truck for $658,979.95 from HGAC in 1997.
Funding:
Fire Department - 1020-12010-530190
Capital Outlay Number: Item No. 207
This equipment will be funded through the City's lease/purchase financing
agre. ement for a 60-month period. The estimated interest rate is 3.85%. The
actual interest rate will be determined after acceptance of the equipment.
The annual payment for the equipment is $285,345.24. The 60 months total,
~~t~'is including principal of $1,295,922.82 and interest of $130,803.33 $1,426,726.20.
Michael"Barrerax, [.P.M.
Procurement and General Services Manager
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 024528 WHICH ADOPTED THE FY 2001-
2002 BUDGET TO AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL FIRE
TRUCK THROUGH LEASE PURCHASE PROGRAM; AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI:
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 024528, which adopted the FY 2001-2002 budget, is
amended to authorize purchase of additional fire track through Lease Purchase Program.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate
action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the
Charter role that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings
so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this
the __ day of ,2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
LEGAL FORM APPROVED ~ Il:>, 2002;
JAMES R. BRAY, JR. U
CITY ATTORNEY
By:
Lisa Aguilar~
Assistant City Attorney
H 5LEG-DIR~LI SA\ORD3 \ORD3.494
8
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the purchase of one pre-owned crawler tractor
with sideboom in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0067-02 from H&V Equipment
Services Inc., Corpus Christi, Texas, based on low bid, for a total of $135,554. This equipment
will be used by the Gas Department and is an addition to the fleet. Funding is available from the
FY01-02 Capital Outlay List.
Purpose:
Bid Notices Issued:
Bid Invitations Received:
Basis of Award:
Price Comparison:
This machine will primarily be used by the Gas Department
to lift and set large diameter pipe and valves on new
installations of pipelines. In order to expedite the delivery
of the machine, the City requested pricing for a pre-owned
machine with a maximum delivery time of 30 days. The
proposed machine has approximately 1450 hrs of use and is
readily available for shipment. The life expectancy of this
type of machine is approximately 15,000 hrs. Included in
the price is a 12-month powertrain warranty covering all
parts and labor for mechanical failure.
4
2
Low Bid
The City purchased a new machine in 2001 for a cost of
$152,341.
Maintenance Services
550020-5110-40110
550020-4130-34130
Capital Outlay Line Items
216A and 144
Total:
$60,000
75,600
$135,600
Mlc~aeXl~Barrera,
Procurement & General Services Manager
City of Corpus Christi
Purchasing Division
Bid Tabulation
Bid Invitation No. BI-0067-02
Used Crawler Tractor with Side Boom & Winches
Quantity: 1 each
Price
H.V. Equipment Serv., Inc.
Corpus Christi, Texas
$135,554
Holt Company of Texas
Corpus Christi, Texas
$144,000
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 22, 2002
SUBJECT: Crosstown / S.P.I.D. Interchange Waterline Adjustment at Gollihar Road and
Johanna Street. (Project No. 8336)
AGENDAITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract
with King-lsles~ Inc. in the amount of $1,065,630 for the Crosstown / S.P.I.D. Interchange
Waterline Adjustments at Gollihar Road and Johanna Street.
ISSUE: The Texas Department of Transportation is constructing the Crosstown-South
Padre Island Drive interchange project. This proposed project is necessary to:
· adjust the existing waterline at Gollihar Road to facilitate the widening of the
overpass structure located on State Highway 286 at Gollihar Road, and
· relocate the existing waterline between the frontage road and main lane to
Johanna Street to avoid conflict with the newly widened pavement on eastbound
travel lanes on S.P.I.D.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the Fiscal Year 01-02 Water Capital
Improvement Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
~i?'el R. Escobar, P. E.,
ector of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit "B" Bid Tab Summary
Exhibit "C" Project Budget
Exhibit "D" Location Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Crosstown / S.P.I.D. Interchange Waterline Adjustment at Gollihar Road and
Johanna Street. (Project No. 8336)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
December 21, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute an amendment to an engineering services contract with Smith, Russo &
Mercer in the amount of $125,950 for engineering services associated with the Up
River Road and Ayers Street Resurfacing Projects and the Crosstown/S.P.l.D 30-
inch Waterline Relocation to Johanna Street. (M2001-469)
January 15, 2002 - Approval of the FY 2001 - 2002 Capital Improvement Budget
(Ordinance No. 024730)
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
March 21, 2001 - Administrative approval of a small engineering services contract
with Naismith Engineering, Inc. for a total fee not to exceed $12,850 for survey
services for Johanna Street / Gollihar Road waterline relocation.
November 16, 2001 - Administrative approval of a small engineering services
contract with Smith, Russo & Mercer Consulting Engineers, Inc. for a total fee not
to exceed $3,000 for engineering services for Johanna Street / Gollihar Road
waterline relocation.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION:
1. None
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Texas Department of Transportation is constructing
the Crosstown-South Padre Island Drive Interchange project. As a result of the project
improvements and TxDOT requirements, it is necessary to adjust existing water lines to
avoid conflict and to place water away from the widened main lane on east-bound SPID.
This proposed project will grout abandoned water lines and replace the existing water lines
away from the additional columns that will support the widening of the overhead main lane
decks on Cresstown Expressway, State Highway 286 at Gollihar and away from widening
main lanes on east-bound SPID. Funds to finance the proposed project are available from
FY 2001-2002 Water Capital Improvement Budget.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project consists of approximately 3,000-linear
feet of 30-inch ductile iron pipe water lines, approximately 500-linear feet of 12-inch PVC
water line, and associated fittings, pavement repair, grouting abandoned water line, and
I EXHIBIT "A" I
Page I of 2
full width seal coat of Johanna and Richter Streets in accordance with the plans, technical
specifications, and contract documents.
BID INFORMATION: This project consists solely of a base bid. The City received
proposals from two (2) bidders on April 3, 2002. (See Exhibit C.) The bid range is as
follows:
Base Bid = $1,065,630 to $1,291,195
The Engineer's construction estimate is $1,000,000. The City's NE Consultant, Smith,
Russo & Mercer, and City Staff recommend that based on Iow bid and past satisfactory
service, a construction contract be awarded in the amount of $1,065,630 to King-Isles, Inc.
for the Crosstown/S.P.l.D. Interchange Waterline Adjustments.
CONTRACT TERMS: The contract specifies that the project will be completed in 150
calendar days, with completion anticipated in late October 2002.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available from the FY 2001 - 2002 Water Capital
Improvement Budget.
I EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2
TABULATICN OF BIDS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING -CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TZXAS
TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: April 3, 2002 TIME OP CCMPLETICN: 150 Consecutive Calender Days ENGINEER'S ESTDMTE: $ 1,000,000.00
Crosstown/S.P.Z.D. Interchange Ring -Isles, Inc. Pate i Pate, LLC
Waterline Adjustments 1641 Goldston Road 300 Valleyvood
Gollihar Rd. & Johanna St. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 The Woodlands, TX 77380
Project Nos. 8336/8387
ITEM
Al
DESCRIPTION
Remove & Replace Pavement -
Asphalt
QTY
60
UNIT
SY
UNIT PRICE
9225.00
AMOUNT
$13,500.00
UNIT PRICE
$175.00
ANDUNT
$10,500.00
A2
Remove & Replace Pavement -
Concrete
29
SY
$200.00
$5,800.00
$231.00
$6,699.00
A3
Remove & Replace Pavement -
Curb, Gutter
62
LF
$30.00
$1,860.00
$28.00
$1,736.00
A4
Trench Safety for Excavations
560
LF
$2.00
$1,120.00
$4.00
$2,240.00
A5
12" PVC Waterline and Fittings
560
LF
$85.00
$47,600.00
$300.00
$168,000.00
A6
Boring for 20" Casing
100
LF
$400.00
$40,000.00
$400.00
$40,000.00
A7
8" Gate Valve
1
EA
$1,250.00
$1,250.00
$1,600.00
$1,600.00
A8
12" Gate Valve
3
EA
$1,700.00
$5,100.00
$1,400.00
$4,200.00
A9
12" 22.5' Bend
2
EA
$600.00
$1,200.00
$400.00
$800.00
A10
12" 45' Bend
6
EA
$600.00
$3,600.00
$400.00
$2,400.00
SiIEET SUB -TOTAL:
$121,030.00
$238,175.00
Page t of 6
2hmLILTION OF BIDS
DEPARTHM OF ENGINOIERING-CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
TABUZAM BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: April 3, 2002 was OF CO14PLETION: 130 Consecutive Calender Days ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $ 1,000,000.00
Crosstova/S.P.I.D. Interchange Ring -Islas, Inc. Pate i Pato, LLC
Waterline Adjustments 1641 Goldston Road 300 Vallsyaocd
Gollihar Rd. G Johanna St. Corpus Christi, TIC 78409 The Woodlands, TE 77380
Project Has. 8336/8387
ITffid
DESCRIPTION
QTY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
A1lDtR7T
All
12" 90' Bend
1
EA
$1,400.00
$1,400.00
$400.00
$400.00
Al2
12" x 8" Cross
1
EA
$1,800,00
$1,600.00
$400.00
$400.00
A13
Grouting Abandoned 12" Waterline
460
LF
$11.00
$5,060.00
$20.00
$9,200.00
SUBTOTAL PERT At
$129,290,00
$248,171.00
_Um
vx
(_
Q)
"!2
0
Page 2 of 6
TABULATION or BIDS
DEPARTMENT Of ENQnM RING -CITY OF CORPUS CRRISTI, TEXAS
TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: April 3, 2002 TndE'08 CCMPLETION: 150 Consecutive Calender Days ENOIPEER'S ESTIMATE: $ 1,000,000.00
Crosstown/S.P.I.D. Interchange King -Isles, Inc. Pate 6 Pate, LLC
Waterline Adjustments 1641 Goldston Road 300 VAlleywood
Gollihar Rd. t Johanna St. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 The Woodlands, TX 77380
Project Kos. 8336/8387
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QTT
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMMM
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
B1
Exploratory Excavation as per
1
LS
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$17,000.00
$17,000.00
Special Provision A-47
B2
30" Temporary Tap and Plug
2
EA
$50,000.00
$100,000.00
$37,000.00
$74,000.00
(Hydra -Stop)
B3
Remove and Replace Pavement -
3000
SY
$30.00
$90,000.00
$25.00
$75,000.00
Asphalt
B4
Remove and Replace Pavement -
20
SY
$115.00
$2,300.00
$150.00
$3,000.00
Concrete
B5
Remove and Replace Pavement -
20
LF
$50.00
$1,000.00
$40.00
$800.00
Curb, Gutter
B5
Trench Safety for Excavations
3,090
LF
$1.50
$4,635.00
$4.00
$12,360.00
B7
Boring for 48" Casing
50
LF
$1,350.00
$67,500.00
$750.00
$37,500.00
B9
30" Cement Lined, Coated, Dip
3,090
LF
$75.00
$231,750.00
$170.00
$525,300.00
Waterline
B9
8" PVC 'Waterline and Fittings
45
LF
$25.00
$1,125.00
$90.00
$4,050.00
SHEET SUB -TOTAL:
$598,310.00
$749,010.00
Page 3 of 6
TABULATION OF BIDS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGnZMM G -CITY OF COMB CHRISTI, TEAS
TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Diractor of Engineering Services
DATE: April 3, 2002 TIME OF COMPLETION: 150 Consecutive Calender Days MOXHIMR•8 E9TI101TE: $ 1,000,000.00
Crosstown/S.P.I.D. Interchange King -Isles, Inc. Pate 6 Pate, LLC
mterlins Adjustments 1641 Goldston Road 300 Valleywood
Gollihar Rd. i Johanna St. Corpus Christi, TS 78409 The Woodlands, TR 77380
Project Non. 8336/8387
ITEM
D89CAIPTION
QTS
UNIT
MUT PRICE
AMO(APP
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
B10
30" 45° Bend
29
EA
$4,200.00
$121,800.00
$4,200.00
$121,800.00
B11
30" 90' Bend
2
EA
$10,300.00
$20,600.00
$4, 600. DO
$9,200.00
312
30" X B" X 30" Tee
1
EA
$5,200.00
$5,200.00
$4,100.00
$4,100.00
313
30" Butterfly Valve
2
EA
$8,500.00
$17,000.00
$9,700.00
$19,400.00
B14
8" Gate Valve
i
EA
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
$800.00
$800.00
B15
30" x 12" Cross
1
EA
$6,450.00
$6,450.00
$6,500.00
$6,500.00
B16
8" 45' Bend
2
EA
$500.00
$1,000.00
$250.00
$500.00
B17
8" 90' Bend
4
EA
$475.00
$1,900.00
$250.00
$1,000.00
B18
8" x 8" Tee
1
EA
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$250.00
$250.00
B19
12" to 8" Reducer
2
EA
$750.00
$1,500.00
$250.00
$500.D0
SHEET SOB -TOTAL:
$177,650.00
$164,050.00
Page 4 of 6
TABULATION OF BIDS
D$PARTHM OF ENGINZMNG-CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
TABULATED ST. 'Angel R. Escobar, P.B., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: April 3, 2002 TDKE OF COMPLETION: 150 Consecutive Calender Days SNGIN&BR,s ESTZD m: $ 1,000,000.00
Crosstown/S.P.I.D. Interchange Ring -Islas, inc. Pat* i Pate, LLC
Waterline Adjustments 1641 Goldston Road 300 Valleywood
Gollihar Rd. i Johanna St. Corpus Christi, TR 78409 The Woodlands, TR 77380
Project Hos. 8336/8387
ITEM
B20
DESCRIPTION QTr
96" Fiberglass Manholes and 1
associated items and work
UNIT
EA
UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
$13,000.00 $13,000.00
UNIT PRICE
$20,000.00
ANDMrz
$20,000.00
B21
Bermuda Seeding 200
BY
$12.00 $2,400.00
$1.00
$200.00
B22
Grouting Abandoned 30" Waterline 2,550
LF
$50.00 $132,500.00
$32.00
$84,800.00
B23
Seal Coat 8,320
SY
$1.50 $12,480.00
$3.00
$24,960.00
PART B SUS -TOTAL:
$936,340.00
$1,043,020.00
Page 5 of 6
TABOIATION or BIDS
DEPARTMENT OF wG2NEERING-CITY or CORPUS C ism, TERAB
TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.S., Director of Engineering services
DATE: April 3, 2002 TINY OF COKLETION: 150 Consecutive Calender Days ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $ 1,000,000.00
Crosstown/S.P.I.D. Interchange Ring -Isles, Inc. Pate 6 Pate, LLC
Waterline Adjustments 1641 Goldston Road 300 Vaileyxood
Gollihar Rd. i JohanSt. Corpus Christi, T$ 78409 The Woodlands, T% 77
Johanna 380
Project Nos. 8336/8387
ITS
DEBCRYPTICW
QTY
OMIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNYT PRICE
AMOUNT
PART A SUB -TOTAL BASE BID
(STREET WORK):
$129,290.00
$248,175.00
PART B SUB -TOTAL BASE BID
(DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS):
$936,340.00
$1,043,02D.00
TOTAL BASE BID
(SUBTOTAL PART A + PART B):
$1,065,630.00
$1,291,195.00
O)
Page 6 of 6
CROSSTOWNIS.P.I.D. INTERCHANGE WATERLINE ADJUSTMENTS
PROJECT BUDGET
April 02, 2002
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
ESTIMATED
BUDGET
IFiscal Year 2001-02 Water Capital Improvement Budget $ 1,250,000.00
Fiscal Year 2001-02 Water Operating Budget 3,000.00
Total ..................................................................................................... $ 1,253,000.00
FUNDS REQUIRED:
Construction Cost (King-Isles, Inc.) $ 1,065,630.00
Construction Contingencies 85,250.00
Design Consultant (Smith Russo & Mercer) 62~000.00
Survey (Naismith Engineering) 12,850.00
Inspection 12,770.00
Engineering Reimbursements 9,000.00
Administrative Reimbursements 4,000.00
incidental Expenses (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,500.00
Total ..................................................................................................... $ 1,253,000.00
EXHIBIT"C" J
Page 1of 1
File : councilexh\8336exh.dwg
NUECES BAY
N
IH37
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CRO$STOWN ~ GOLLIHAR
PROJECT LOCATION
~.P./'.D ~ JOHANNA
LOCATION
F.~, 43
FM 2444
PROJECT N0.8336
LOCATION J/IAP
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT "D"
CROSSTOWN/S.P. I.D. INTERCHANGE
WATERLINE ADJUSTMENTS at GOLLIHAR
ROAD and JOHANNA ST.
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: I of 1
DATE: 04-05-2002
10
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Installation of Wastewater Clean-outs FY 2001 - 2002 (Project No. #7246)
AGENDAITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract
in the amount of $161,435 with Rycon E & C, LLC for the Installation of Wastewater Clean-
outs FY 2001 - 2002.
ISSUE: Residential sanitary service lines that do not have clean-outs must be broken into
by the Wastewater Department to clear stoppages. These service lines need to be
repaired to prevent debds and surface water from entering the collection system, causing
line blockages and/or overloading of treatment plants during heavy rainfall events. This
project provides for the rapid installation of clean-outs as the need arises, as well as
installations in problem-prone neighborhoods before blockages occur.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2001-2002 Wastewater Capital
Improvement Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
Foster Crowell,
Wastewater Superintendent
'~Jl~l I~: Escobar, P.E., "'
I~irector of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit "B" Bid Tab Summary
Exhibit "C" Project Budget
Exhibit "D" Typical Clean-Out Assembly Installation
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Installation of Wastewater Clean-outs FY 2001 - 2002 (Project No. #7246)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. January 15, 2002 - Approval of the FY 2001 - 2002 Capital Improvement Budget
for $152,674,800. (Ordinance No. 024730)
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: None
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: None
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Wastewater Department assumes the responsibility for
all sanitary sewer lines within public right-of-way and easements. When a blockage occurs
in a service line and there is no clean-out, the line must be exposed and broken into to see
if responsibility for the problem lies with the City or the property owner. Once the blockage
has been cleared, the broken pipe must be replaced and a clean-out installed. Many
Corpus Christi homes were constructed before clean-outs were required in the City's
Plumbing Code, the Wastewater Division has accumulated numerous work orders for
clean-outs.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of the complete
approximately 400 clean-outs which will include:
· excavation of service line;
· removal of damaged pipe;
· installation of new PVC clean-out assemblies;
· site cleanup; and
· backfill
installation of
BID INFORMATION: The project consists solely of a base bid. The City received a
proposal from one (1) bidder on March 20, 2002. (See Exhibit "B") The bid was for
$161,435. The Engineer's estimated construction cost for the project is $220,000.00
The bid opening was delayed one week to encourage more bidders. Due to the saturation
of work in the market at this time, this job did not carry a high priority for private contractors
to bid. The one bid received did come in lower than the Engineer's construction estimate.
At this time it is advised that based on past satisfactory experience with projects of this
type, that a construction contract be awarded in the amount of $161,435 to Rycon E & C,
LLC for the Installation of Wastewater Clean-outs FY 2001 - 2002.
CONTRACT TERMS: The contract specifies that the project will be completed in 180
calendar days, with completion anticipated by late November 2002.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 2
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the Wastewater Capital Improvement
Budget.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2
TABULATION OF BIDS Page 1 of 1
DEPARTMERT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
TABULATED BY: "gal R.Eacobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 TIME OF COMPLETION: 180 Calendar Days
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATEt $220,000
Installation of Wastewater
Rycon E&C, LLC
Clean -Outs
3316 N. FM -1355
Project No. 7246
Kingsville, TX 78363
DESCRIPTION
QTY.
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
Item
4" Clean -Outs
400
EA
319.00
127,600.00
No.l
0.00
0.00
Item
6" Clean -Outs
5
EA
349.00
1,745.00
No.2
0.00
0.00
Item
Remove and replace all 4" pipe to
750
LF
6.00
4,500.00
N0.3
and including the bend
0.00
0.00
Item
Remove and replace all 6" pipe to
200
LF
8.00
1,600.00
N0.4
and including the bend
0.00
0.00
Item
Remove and replace all 4" pipe
750
IF
10.00
7,500.00
No.S
from main, w/new PVC saddle to
0.00
0.00
the bend
Item
Remove and replace all 6" pipe
200
LF
12.00
2,400.00
N0.6
from main, w/new, PVC saddle to
0.00
0.00
the bend
Item
Trench safety. measures
950
LF
190.00
No.7
.20
0.00
0.00
Item
Remove and reinstall existing
750
LF
8.00
6,000.00
NO.8
fence
0.00
0.00
Item
Sod
400
SF
6.00
2,400.00
No.9
0.00
0.00
Item
Concrete flatwork repair
400
SF
5.00
2,000.00
No.10
0.00
0.00
Item
Asphalt pavement repair
100
BY
50.00
5,000.00
No.li
0.00
0.00
Item
Caliche repair _
100
SY
5.00
500.00
No. 12
0.00
0.00
TOTAL E B12,
161 435.00
EXHMIT"B"
Pane 1 of 1
WASTEWATER CLEANOUT INSTALLATION PROGRAM FY 01-02
PROJECT BUDGET
April 02, 2002
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
IFiscal Year 2001-02 Wastewater Capital Improvement Budget
FUNDS REQUIRED:
ESTIMATED
BUDGET
I $ 250,000.00
Construction Cost (Rycon E & C, LLC) $ 161,435.00
Construction Contingencies 16,143.00
Inspection 5,000.00
Engineering Reimbursements 3,000.00
Administrative Reimbursements 1,000.00
Incidental Expenses (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000.00
Total ..................................................................................................... $ 187,578.00
EXHIBIT "C"
Page 1 of 1
DR/VEWAY SE~ER /~A/N & TAP
TYPZCAL DR.T.T_ VEWAY
CLEAN-OUT ASSEMBLY
CT. TY PROJECT NO. 7193
TYPZCAL
CLEAN-OUT ASSEMBLY
INSTALLATZON
EXHZBZT "D"
T. NSTALLATT. ON OF WASTEWATER CLEAN-OUTS
FY 01-02
CI'P~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS
CZTY COUNCZL EXHZBZT ~
DEP~E'NT OF ENGINEERING SER~C~
PAGE: I of I
___--.--
~TE: 03-13-2002 ~
~ . r ~ ~
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Broadway WWTP Lift Station Diversion Project (Project #7110)
AGENDAITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 6 to an
engineering services contract with Govind E.C. in the amount of $99,112 for the Broadway
Plant Lift Station Diversion project.
ISSUE: At the Council meeting of January 29, 2002, staff was instructed to proceed with
Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Diversion Option #3 to construct a new wastewater
treatment plant in the industrial area. This amendment for engineering services is
necessary to accomplish that directive.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2001-2002 Capital Improvement
Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
!
Foster Crowell, '
Wastewater Superintendent 6~c~ .............. of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit"B" Contract Summary
Exhibit "C" Location Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Broadway WWTP Lift Station and Diversion Project (Project #7110).
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Au.qust 18, 1998 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
an engineering services contract with Govind & Associates, Inc. in the amount of
$329,853 for engineering services associated with the Airport Ditch Outfall
Improvements and Broadway Plant Lift Station and Diversion to Greenwood
PlantJNueces River Delta. (M1998-285)
2. Au.qust 22, 2000 - Approval of the FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Budget
(Ordinance No. 024162).
3. May 5, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee; to execute
Amendment No. 3 to an engineering services contract with Govind & Associates,
Inc. in the amount of $43,010 for engineering services associated with the Airport
Ditch Outfall Improvements and Broadway Plant Lift Station and Diversion to
Greenwood Plant/Nueces River Delta. (M2001-189).
4. October 30, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 5 to an engineering services contract with Govind & Associates,
Inc. in the amount of $48,560 for engineering services associated with the Airport
Ditch Ouffall Improvements and Broadway Plant Lift Station and Diversion to
Greenwood Plant/Nueces River Delta. (M2001-409).
5. February 26, 2002 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute a contract amendment granting permission for Govind E.C. to assume all
the obligations and duties of engineering contracts between the City and Govind &
Associates, Inc. (M2002-059).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. September 10. 1999 -Administrative Amendment No. 1 to an engineering services
contract with Govind & Associates for a total fee not to exceed $4,480 for a total
restated fee not to exceed $334,313, for archaeological survey services for the
Airport Ditch Outfail Improvements.
2. June 27, 2000 - Administrative Amendment No. 2 to an engineering services
contract with Govind & Associates for a total fee not to exceed $9,480 for a total
restated fee not to exceed $343,793, to evaluate alternate pump station locations.
3. June 19, 2001 - Administrative Amendment No. 4 to an engineering services
contract with Govind & Associates for a total fee not to exceed $14,020 for a total
restated fee not to exceed $400,823, to evaluate alternate pump station locations.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Council will be requested to authorize the necessary
engineering amendments and construction contracts to implement the preferred Option #3
improvements of constructing a new wastewater treatment plant in the industrial area.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page I of 2
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The 1997 Council-approved Facilities Implementation Plan
recommended diversion of the waste stream from the Broadway Wastewater Treatment
Plant to the Greenwood Plant. Subsequent analyses have indicated a cost far exceeding
the '97 Study estimates. At the Council meeting of January 29, 2002, staff presented an
update on the status of the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Diversion project
including a comprehensive cost comparison of:
· Option One: diversion of effluent to Greenwood;
· Option Three: construction of a new facility at to be located in the industrial area;
and,
· Option Four: construction of a new facility to be located at the existing site.
Staff was instructed to proceed with Option No. 3 of constructing a new wastewater
treatment plant in the industrial area. This directive will require the services of an A/E
agreement to begin the process of property acquisition of an environmentally acceptable
location.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This A/E agreement will include: · Assembling team to facilitate the negotiations for land acquisition from CITGO;
· Title research;
· Appraisal of property;
· Preparing specifications for necessary geotechnical services associated with the
purchase of the property;
· Review of Phase One of the Environmental Assessment Report
· Preparation of Phase Two of the Environmental Assessment Report
· Subsequent negotiations with the Port of Corpus Christi for purchase of a portion
of the CITGO parcel;
· Wetlands mitigation;
· Survey and platting of proposed site;
· All legal documentation and contracts necessary to purchase property;
· All necessary permitting;
· Fatal Flaw Analysis;
· Exhibits of proposed layout of new CITGO tanks and construction estimates;
· Complete plans and specifications for demolition of existing tanks on CITGO
site; and
· Completion of the Design Memorandum, including a supplemental report
analyzing the viability of the three options explored and concluding with the
recommendation of an acceptable site on which to build a future wastewater
treatment plant.
CONTRACT SUMMARY/FEE: A contract summary and fee is attached as Exhibit "B".
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2
CONTRACT SUMMARY
BROADWAY PLANT LIFT STATION DIVERSION PROJECT
AMENDMENT NO 6
Section II. SCOPE OF SERVICES, Paragraph B, ADDITIONAL SERVICES,
BROADWAY PLANT LIFT STATION AND DIVERSION TO GREENWOOD
PLANT/NUECES RIVER DELTA shall be modified by adding the additional
paragraphs shown below.
8. New Site Acquisition. The Engineer will:
Perform all necessary services to implement Option Three, Construct a New
Plant in the Industrial Area, as recommended in the letter report delivered as part
of Amendment No. 5 to this contract and approved by City Council on January
29, 2002.
1. Retain the services of essential persons to facilitate the purchase of
recommended site.
a. Mr. W. Thomas Utter, under a separate contract with Govind E.C., will
work as a facilitator in negotiating for the land acquisition from Citgo. He
will be available for ail the negotiations between the City, CITGO and Port
Authority. He will also be available during all City Council presentations;
b. Stewart Rice, an attorney with Wood, Boykin & Walters law firm, will
under a separate contract with Govind E.C, assist the City in acquiring the
recommended site and prepare all the necessary legal documents
including the Title Report and appraisal of the said property; and
c. acquire services of environmental professional firm of PBS&J under a
separate contract with Govind E.C., for review of the Environmental Site
Assessment Phase I to be provided by CITGO. After approval of Phase I,
PBS&J will be responsible for collecting and analyzing soil samples from
the CITGO site and preparing the Phase II Environmental Assessment
report.
Meet, as necessary, with City staff, respective property owners, outside
agencies and other interested parties to facilitate the purchase of
recommended site.
a. conduct at least one meeting per month, not to exceed twelve meetings
during the next eight to ten months with City of Corpus Christi staff and
relevant participants. Govind E.C will be responsible for preparing the
agenda for each meeting, taking meeting notes, preparing action items,
designating persons for each task and setting deadlines for each task;
b. meet with CITGO representatives about the purchase of 11+ acres out of
a 30-acre parcel of land off the North Port Avenue, known as CITGO
terminal warehouse;
c. negotiate the terms and conditions for Port Authority to purchase a
portion of the CITGO parcel from the City of Corpus Christi; AND
EXHIBIT "B"
Page I of 4
d. negotiate the terms and conditions for Port Authority for the wetland
mitigation of the CITGO property.
Survey the necessary two parcels of land for the futura wastewater plant site,
including the Salt Flats Drainage ditch, and the area to be sold to the Port
Authority and define the metes and bounds for these properties.
4. Deliverables will include:
a. complete plans and specifications (in City preferred format) for demolition
of existing tanks on the CITGO site including clean up of the pipelines
and tank structures;
b. exhibits of proposed layout of new CITGO tanks and construction
estimates;
c. specifications for geotechnical services and soil sampling for the CITGO
site. A disposal plan for any contaminated soils and liquids will be
prepared and include cost estimates for the disposal of contaminated soil
and petroleum products. The City Attorney's office, with the assistance of
an Environmental Attorney will use the information in the soil report to
apply for remediation and construction grant under the Brownsfields
Redevelopment Act;
d. a fatal flaw analysis for ail the tasks ralated to the land acquisition from
CITGO;
e. a timeline of the completed project with December 31, 2008 being the
completion date for the entira project (including construction); AND
f. the Design Memorandum for the Broadway Diversion project will be
ravised and the raport will be finalized. A supplemental report will update
the latest version of the Design Memorandum and will include an analysis
of the viability of the three explorad options and conclude with the
racommendation of an acceptable site on which to build a futura
wastewater treatment plant.
Section II. SCOPE OF SERVICES, STAGE 2 BROADWAY PLANT LIFT STATION AND
DIVERSION TO GREENWOOD PLANT/NUECES RIVER DELTA shall be modified by
adding the additional table shown below.
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
DATE ACTIVITY
End of April 2002 Initial Meeting with Citgo
Appraisal and Contract praparation for Citgo
May 2002 site
Mid-June 2002 Agreement and access to property for survey
and field data
June 2002 Site Assessment Phase 1 (by Citgo)
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 2 of 4
July to September 2002 Engineering for New Tanks on Citgo Site
July to January 2003 Wetlands Mitigation by Port Authority
End of December 2002 Demolition of three (3) petroleum tanks not
being used
End of December 2002 Site Assessment Phase II (PBS&J)
End of December 2002 Design Memorandum Updated
January to February 2003 Finalize Report
February 2003 Construction of two (2) new tanks
Mamh 2003 Temporary pumps and transferring of
petroleum products from old to new tanks
April/May 2003 Demolition of two (2) remaining old tanks
after transfer of petroleum products
3. FEES
C. Summary of Fees shall be modified by the following additions:
See Fees as shown in the following table:
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 3 of 4
AIRPORT DITCH OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS & BROADWAY WWTP DIVERSION TO
Fees for Basic Service
Project f
Preliminary Phase - Design Memorandum
Preliminary Phase - Stage Two
Design Phase
Bid Phase
Construction Phase
Sub -Total Fees Basic Service
Fees for Additional Service
1. Permitting
2. Survey
3. Environmental Assessments
4. Permit Preparation
5. O&M Manual Preparation
6. Start-up Services
7. Topographic Services
8. New Site Acquisition
Sub -Total Fees Additional Service
Total of Authorized Fees
Total Amendment No. 6: $99,112
AMENDMENT NO. 6
Project No. #7110
April 16, 2002
Airport
Broadway
Total
Amend.
Amend.
Amend.
Amend.
Amend.
Amend.
Total
Ditch
Plant
Contract
No.1
No.2
No.3
No.4
No.5
No.6
Invoice
44,000.00
175,210.00
219,210.00
0.00
9,480.00
5,230.00
14,020.00
43,560.00
0.00
291,500.00
44,523.00
0.00
44,523.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
44,523.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33,170.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33,170.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,750.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,750.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88,523.00
175,210.00
263,733.00
0.00
9,480.00
41,150.00
14,020.00
43,560.00
0.00
371,943.00
34,920.00
0.00
34,920.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34,920.00
31,200.00
0.00
31,200.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
31,200.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,460.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,460.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
310.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
310.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,030.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,030.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
520.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
520.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
99,112.00
99,112.00
66,120.00
0.00
66,120.00
4,460.00
0.00
1,860.00
0.00
5,000.00
99112.00
176,552.00
154,643.001
175,210.001
329,853.001
4,460.001
9,480.001
43,010.001
14,020.001
48,560.00
99,112.00
548,495.00
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 4 of 4
File : ~Mproject\councilexhibits\exh7110.dwg
PROJECT LOCATION ~N~
~ /~/~'~ co~o~c~,~
LEOPARD \t I
CORPUS CHR~SD SH~P
VIClNI~ ~P
CZ~ PR~ECT No. 7110 NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT "C"
BRO~WAY P~T LIFT STATION cz~ ~NCZL EXHZ.ZT
DEPONENT OF ENGINE~ING SERWC~
DIVERSION PROJECT PA~E: I of I '_
CI~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TE~S DATE: 04-12-2002
12
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 8, 2002
SUBJECT: Laguna Madre Service Area - Collection System Rehabilitation
(Project No. 7098)
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 2 for Stage 2 services to the engineering contract with Goldston
Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $249,575 for the Laguna Madre Service Area -
Collection System Rehabilitation Project.
ISSUE: The City's consultant, Goldston Engineering, Inc., has completed Stage 1
services of the contract. They are ready to proceed with Stage 2 services including
Preliminary Phase, Design Phase, Bid Phase, Construction Phase, and Data Review
and Implementation Plan Update.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2001-2002 Sanitary Sewer
Capital Projects Fund.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
Wastewater Superintendent
~el R. Escobar, P. E.
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A' Background Information
Exhibit "B" Contract Summary
Exhibit "C" Location Map
H:~HOME~VELMAR~G EN~WASTEWAT~7115~AMENDMENT I'~AGENDA MEMORANDUM
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
SUBJECT: Laguna Madre Service Area - Collection System Rehabilitation
(Project No. 7098)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. January 27, 1998: Award of an engineering contract in the amount of $397,587 to
Goldston Engineering, Inc. for the Laguna Madre Service Area: Collection System
Rehabilitation (Motion No. M98-013).
2. October 12, 1999 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 1 to the Engineering Services Contract with Goldston Engineering,
Inc. in the amount of $77,708 to expand the scope of services of the Laguna Madre
Service Area Collection System Rehabilitation Project to include additional services
for Closed Cimuit Television Inspection (Motion No. M99-356).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. February 18, 1998 - Executed Geographic Information System (GIS) Data Sharing
Agreement with Goldston Engineering, Inc.
2. May 5, 1999 - Executed Agreement for Consultant Services with Fugro South, Inc.
in the amount of $4,627.50.
3. July 23, 1999 - Executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Consultant
Services with Fugre South, Inc. in the amount of $2,700 for a total re-stated fee of
$7,327.50.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of required construction contracts.
BACKGROUND: The Laguna Madre Wastewaster Treatment Plant serves the Flour
Bluff area of the City. Because Flour Bluff is a Iow-lying area with primarily sandy soils,
the majority of the sanitary sewers are in wet conditions because of the high
groundwater table. Even during periods of negligible rainfall, tidal conditions can keep
the groundwater level high.
The majodty of the sanitary sewers in Flour Bluff are old and constructed using pipe
materials and joints that are no longer considered acceptable. Therefore, groundwater
enters the pipe through joints and cracks in the pipe materials. Also, the manholes
were constructed using bdck and mortar. The mortar chemically reacts with the gases
created by the sewage and deteriorates, leaving openings in the manholes for additional
infiltration of groundwater.
To formulate a long-range program for reducing the amount of infiltration, the City
contracted Goldston Engineering, Inc. Goldston Engineering, Inc., has completed
Stage 1 services of the contract. Stage 1 services allowed the consultant to isolate and
evaluate the sources of inflow and infiltration in three (3) phases as follows:
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 2
H:\HOME~V1ELMAR~GEI~WASTEWA'I~7098'~AM DENDMENT NO. Z~GENDA BACKGROUND
· Evaluation and Data Review Phase
· Sanitary Sewer Overflow Study and Analysis Phase
· Abatement Plan Phase
Amendment No. 1 allowed Goldston Engineering, Inc. to provide oversight and hire a
sub-consultant to per[orm closed circuit television (CCTV) inspections services. The
CCTV inspection consisted of internal color television inspection of pipes on VHS format
tapes. Included with the tapes are inspection logs of the line segments televised. The
logs show the entire line segment, including all connections, defects, infiltration, roots,
grease, etc. The information collected through the CCTV inspection assist the
consultant in preparation of detailed plans and specifications for a proposed
construction project to remedy collection system deficiencies.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed amendment will allow Goldston Engineering,
Inc. to provide two (2) Parts (A and B) Stage 2 services including Part A: Preliminary
Phase, Design Phase, Bid Phase, Construction Phase, and Part B: Data Review and
Implementation Plan Update services. A sequence of phased projects to rehabilitate,
replace, and/or clean lines in the problem areas will be developed in Part B.
Remediation work as a result of both parts of this amendment will be done to improve
the capacity of lines within existing wastewater collection systems in the Laguna Madre
Service Area by reducing/eliminating extra water from extraneous sources.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2
CONTRACT SUMMARY
LAGUNA MADRE SERVICE AREA
COLLECTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION
AMENDMENT NO. 2
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Basic Services, Stage II - Part A - Sewer Rehabilitation Project
1. Preliminary Phase. The Engineer will:
It is the intent of the Preliminary Phase to provide an engineering report,
which includes Preliminary designs, drawings, and written description of the
project. This report shall include:
a. confer with the City staff regarding the design parameters of the Project.
The Engineer will participate in a minimum of three formal meetings with
City staff, provide agenda and purpose for each formal meeting; document
and distribute meeting minutes and meeting report within seven (7)
working days of the meeting. The Engineer will participate in discussions
with the operating department and other agencies;
b. submit one copy in an approved electronic format, and ten (10) paper
copies of the engineering report, with executive summary, opinion of
probable construction costs, and review with City staff to produce an
acceptable format which contains common municipal elements.
Engineering Report will include the following (with CONSTRUCTABILITY
being a major element in all the following items):
1)
2)
3)
4)
review of the Project with the respective Operating
Department(s) and discussions including clarification and
definition of intent and execution of the Project. The
Engineer will meet with City staff to collect data, discuss
materials and methods of construction, and identify design
and construction requirements;
review and investigate available records, archives, and
pertinent data related to the Project including taking
photographs of the Project site, list of potential problems and
possible conflicts, intent of design, and improvements
required;
review results of site field investigation including site
findings, existing conditions, and probable Project design
solutions; (which are common to municipalities);
provide parameters which will or may impact the design,
including engineering design basis, preliminary layout
sketches, identification of needed additional services,
EXHIBIT"B"
Page '1 of 7
5)
6)
7)
preliminary details of construction of critical elements,
identification of needed permits, identification of
specifications to be used, identification of quality and
quantity of materials of construction, and other factors
required for a professional design (CONSTRUCTABILITY);
identify and analyze requirements of governmental
authorities having jurisdiction to approve design of the
Project and permitting, environmental, historical,
construction, and geotechnical issues; and meet with
pertinent authorities;
confer, discuss, and meet with City operating department(s)
and Engineering Services staff to produce a cohesive, well-
defined proposed scope of design, probable cost
estimates(s) and design alternatives;
provide a letter stating that the Engineer and Sub-consultant
Engineers have checked and reviewed the engineering
report prior to submission;
2. Design Phase. Upon approval of the preliminary phase, designated by
receiving authorization to proceed from the City, the Engineer will:
a. implement the Engineering Report recommendations including
construction sequencing, connections to the existing facilities, and
restoration of property and incorporate these plans into the construction
plans. Development of the construction sequencing will be coordinated
with Engineering Services staff;
b. prepare one set of Construction Bid and Contract Documents in City
format (using City Standards as applicable) including Contract
agreement forms, general conditions and supplemental conditions,
invitation to bid, instruction to bidders, insurance, bond requirements, and
preparation of other contract and bid related items; specifications and
drawings to fix and describe, for one bid, the size and character of the
entire Project; description of materials to be utilized; and such other
essentials as may be necessary for construction and cost analysis;
c. provide assistance to identify the testing, handling and disposal of any
hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered
during construction (to be included under additional services);
d. prepare final quantities and estimates of probable costs and probable
construction schedule;
e. furnish 1-copy 60% plans (plans only-identify needed specifications) to the
City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable
construction costs. Required with the 60% plans is a "Plan Executive
Summary" which will identify and summarize the project by distinguishing
key elements such as: · Pipe Size;
· Pipe Material, etc;
H:~HOME~VELMAI~GEN~WASTEWAT~7098~MENDMENT NO. 2\CONTRACT SUMMARY
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 2 of 7
Why one material is selected over another;
· Pluses of selections;
· Permit requirements and why;
· Easement requirements and why;
· Embedment type and why;
· Constructability, etc.;
· Specific requirements of the City;
· Standard specifications;
· Non-standard specifications;
· Any unique requirements;
· Cost, alternatives, etc. and
· Other items determined to be applicable or noteworthy.
f. Assimilate all review comments, modifications, additions/deletions and
proceed to the next phase, upon notice to proceed;
g. furnish complete construction bid and contract documents including
specifications for City staff review and approval. Provide one copy of
100% complete plans and bid documents to the City staff for review and
approval purposes with revised estimates of probable costs. Identify
distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected utilities
including City and all other affected entities, compile comments and
incorporate any requirements into the plans and specifications, and advise
City of responding and non-responding participants;
h. provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QNQC) measures to ensure
that submittal of the 60% and 100% complete plans and bid documents
with specifications accurately reflect the percent completion designated
and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by
City staff. The Engineer shall submit a letter declaring that all engineering
disciplines of all phases of the submittals have been checked, reviewed,
and are complete pdor to submission, and include signature of all
disciplines including but not limited to structural, civil, mechanical,
electrical, etc;
i. upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services, provide one (1) set
(hard copy and electronic) of final plans and contract documents suitable
for reproduction (In City Format) and said bid documents henceforth
become the sole property and ownership of the City of Corpus Christi;
j. the City agrees that any modifications of the submitted final plans (for
other uses by the City) will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and
sealed by a registered engineer prior to re-use of modified plans;
k. prepare and submit monthly status reports with action items developed
from monthly progress and review meetings;
I. provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan; and
m. Ordinance No. 19663 establishes the Municipal Public Arts Program
requiring works of art to be included in certain city construction projects. If
it is determined this project is subject to Municipal Public Art Program, the
architectJengineer will cooperate during the design process to fulfill the
requirements of the ordinance.
EXHIBIT "B" I
Page 3 of 7
H:'tHOM E~VE LMAR~,GEN~WASTEWA~;~098~,MENDMENT NO, 2\CONTRACT SUMMARY
3. Bid Phase. The Engineer will:
a. participate in the pro-bid conference;
b. assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective bidders,
and review of bids by solicited interests;
c. review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid
documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services'
approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors
of approved changes prior to bidding;
d. attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and
make recommendation concerning award of the controct; and
e. in the event the lowest responsible bidder's bid exceeds the project
budget as revised by the Engineering Services in accordance with the
Engineer's design phase estimate required above, the Engineer will, at its
expense, confer with City staff and make such revisions to the bid
documents as the City staff deems necessary to re-advertise that
particular portion of the Project for bids.
4. Construction Phase. The Engineer will perform contract administration to
include the following:
a. participate in pro-construction meeting;
b. review for conformance to contract documents, shop and working
drawings, materials and other submittals;
c. review field and laboratory tests;
d. provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the
contractor and authorize minor changes, which do not affect the
contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City
under the contract;
e. make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project
inspector and contractor to observe the general progress and quality of
work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance
with the contract documents. This will not be confused with the project
representative observation or continuous monitoring of the progress of
construction;
f. prepare change orders (coordinate with the City's construction division);
provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for
the contractor and authorize minor changes which do not affect the
contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City
under the contract;
g. make final inspection with City staff and provide the City with a Certificate
of Completion for the project; and
h. review construction "rod-line" drawings, prepare record drawings of the
Project as constructed (from the "rod-line" drawings, inspection, and the
controctor provided plans) and deliver to the Engineering Services a
H:IHO M L~VELMAR~GEN~WASTEWA~7098~AM E N DM E NT NO. 2'~ONTRACT SUMMARy
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 4 of 7
reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r. 14 or later) of the record
drawings. All drawings will be CADD drawn using dwg format in
AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being
provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format
in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS
system.
Stage II - Part B - Data Review and Implementation Plan Update
5. Data Review and Implementation Plan Update
a. Correlate the information from this project and the initial study and prepare
recommendations and an implementation plan for line
replacement/rehabilitation.
b. Provide preliminary cost estimates based on recommendations.
SECTION II. SCOPE OF SERVICES, PART C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES is amended
to include the following:
C. Additional Services
This section defines the scope and compensation for additional services that may be
included, as part of this contract, but the Engineer will not begin work on this section
without specific written approval by the Director of Engineering Services. The
Engineer will, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, do
the following:
Stage II - Part A
1. Provide field investigations required for design and the preparation of the
plans for the CIPP and CCTV portions of the project to establish locations of
manholes and working conditions.
2. Provide topographic surveys, as required for design including the necessary
control points, coordinates and elevations of points. Establish base survey
controls for line and elevation staking (not detailed setting of lines and grades
for specific structures or facilities). All work must be tied to and conform with
the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network and comply with
Category 6, Condition I specifications of the Texas Society of Professional
Surveyors'Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth
Edition. Include reference to a minimum of two (2) found boundary
monuments from the project area.
3. Provide Construction Observation services including day-to-day detailed
coordination three hours per week for 20 weeks with the City's staff and
testing laboratory.
4. Provide a maintenance guaranty (warranty) inspection toward the end of the
one-year period after acceptance of the Project. Note defects requiring
contractor action to maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, or replace
EXHIBIT "B" I
Page 5 of 7
improvement under the maintenance guaranty terms of the contract.
Document the condition and prepare a report for the City staff of the locations
and conditions requiring action, with its recommendation for the method or
action to best correct defective conditions and submit to City Staff. Complete
the inspection and prepare the report no later than sixty (60) days prior to the
end of the maintenance guaranty pedod.
Stage II - Part B
Provide a review and analysis of findings of the CCTV videotapes for
approximately 25,000 LF of line.
Field locate and inspect 112 manholes. Sixty-five manholes aro within street
ROW and 47 manholes are located on pdvate property. Document existing
fences, trees, etc. on private property that may be removed for future
manhole repairs. The 65 manholes within the street ROW are overlayed with
asphalt pavement and will require a backhoe to remove the 3avement.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Goldston Engineering, Inc. will perform all engineering services necessary to
review and prepare plans, specifications, and bid and contract documents; and
provide contract administration services to complete the Project. Work will not
begin on Additional Services until written authorization is provided by the Director
of Engineering Services.
3. PROJECT SCHEDULE
PROJECT SCHEDULE - STAGE ONE: Stage One - Complete
PROJECT SCHEDULE-STAGETWO
DAY DATE ACTIVITY
Wednesday 04/24/02 Begin Preliminary Phase
Wednesday 06/19/02 Submit Preliminary Phase to City
Wednesday 07/03/02 Begin Design Phase
Wednesday 08/14/02 60% Submittal
Wednesday 09/25/02 Final Submittal
Monday (2) 10/28/02 Advertise for Bids
Monday 11/11/02 Pro-Bid Conference
Wednesday 12/11/02 Receive Bids
Wednesday 01/15/03 Begin Construction
Wednesday 06/04/03 Construction Completion
EXHIBIT "B" I
Page 6 of 7
H;~HO ME~VELMAR~GEI~WASTEWA~7098~AM E NDM ENT NO. 2~CONTRACT SUMMARY
4. FEES
Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the Engineer a fixed fee for providing for
all "Basic Services" authorized as per the following table. The fees for Basic
Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for
all services outlined above, and for all expenses incurred in performing these
services. For services provided, Engineer will submit monthly statements for basic
services rendered. The statement will be based upon Engineer's estimate of the
proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. The
statement will be based upon the pement of completion of the construction contract.
City will make prompt monthly payments in response to Engineer's monthly
statements.
Fee for Additional Services. For services authorized by the Director of
Engineering Services, the City will pay the Engineer a not-to-exceed fee as per the
allowance shown in the following table.
Summary of Fees
H:~,HOME"',VELMAFAGEN~WASTEWAT~7098~MENDMENT NO. 2~CONTRACT SUMMARY
EXHIBIT "B" r
Page 7 of 7
SUMMARY OF FEES
LAGUNA MADRE SERVICE AREA
COLLECTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION
PROJECT NO. 7098
Task No. Original Amend. Amend. Total
Description Contract No. 1 No. 2 Restated Fee
A. Basic Services, Stage 1
1 Evaluation and Data Review Phase $20,724.00 $0.0£ $0.0( $20,724.00
2 I/I - SSO Phase 311,871.00 0.0£ 0.0t 311,871.00
3 I/I - Abatement Plan 64,992.00 0.0£ 0.0( 64,992.00
4 Closed Circuit TV 0.00 51,058.0C 0.0( 51,058.00
Total Basic Services, Stage 1 Fees 397,587.00 51,058.0(; 0.0( 448,645.00
B. Basic Services, Stage 2
1 Preliminary Phase 0.00 0.0C 45,000.0C 45,000.00
2 Design Phase 0.00 0.0(3 50,800.0C 50,800.00
3 Bid Phase 0.00 0.0(3 4,800.0{~ 4,800.00
4 Construction Phase 0.00 0.0(3 11,275.0(~ 11,275.0£
Staoe 2. Part B
Data Review and Implementation Plan
5 Update 0.00 0.0(3 11,900.0(~ 11,900.00
Total Basic Services, Stage 2 Fees 0.00 0.0(3 123,775.0(3 123,775.00
C. Additional Services, Stage 2
1 Surveying 0.00 0.0(3 0.0(~ 0.0£
2 Permitting 0.00 0.0(3 0.0(3 0.0C
3 Inspection 0.00 0.0(3 0.0(3 0.0C
4 Warranty 0.00 0.0(3 0.0(3 0.0C
5 Drought Contingency Plan 0.00 1,650.0(3 0.0(3 1,650.0(;
6 Point Repairs 0.00 10,000.0(3 0.0(3 10,000.0(~
7 Additional Cleaning or CCTV Inspection 0.00 5,000.0(3 0.0(3 5,000.0(;
8 Toxic Solids of Semi-solids Removal and
Disposal 0.00 10,000.0(3 0.0(3 10,000.0(~
Staae 2. Part A
1 Field Investigation for ClPP/CCTV 0.00 0.00 17,200.0(3 17,200.0(3
2 Topographic Survey 0.00 0.00 12,100.0(3 12,100.0(3
3 Construction Observation 0.00 0.00 6,900.0(3 6,900.0(3
4 Warranty Inspection 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.0(3
5 Video Tape Review 0.00 0.00 5,300.00 5,300.00
6 Field Locate and Inspect Manholes 0.00 0.00 83,300.00 83,300.00
Total Additional Services Fees 0.00 26,650.00 125,800.00 152,450.00
TOTAL AUTHORIZED FEE $397,587.001 $77,708.00~ $249,575.00 $724,870.00
\ Mproject \ councilexhibits \ exh 7 098.dwg
San Pat~cio County
NUECES BAY
N
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
Nueces County
N,A.S.
GRAPHIC SCALE
LAGUNA MADRE
SERVICE AREA
PFIO~IECT # 7098
Laguna Madre Servlce Area
Collection System Rehab. Project
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
EXHZBZT "C"
CZTY COUNCZL EXHZBZT
DEPARTMENT OF' ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: 1 of 1
DATE: 3/26/02
13
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Buckingham Estates Lift Station (Project #7117)
AGENDAITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to an
engineering services contract with Coym, Rehmet, Gutierrez Engineering, Inc. in the
amount of $299,040 for the Buckingham Estates Lift Station project. (Project # 7117)
ISSUE: The Buckingham Estates Lift Station does not have adequate reserve pump
capacity and must be upgraded to accommodate anticipated growth on the south side of
the City.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2001-2002 Capital Improvement
Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
Wastewater Superintendent
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit"B" Contract Summary
Exhibit "C" Location Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Buckingham Estates Lift Station (Project #7117)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. February 22, 2000 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute an engineering services contract with Coym, Rehmet, Gutierrez
Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $37,306 for engineering services associated with
the Buckingham Estates Lift Station project. (M2000-050)
2. January 15, 2002 - Approval of the FY 2001-02 Capital Improvement Budget
(Ordinance No. 024730).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: None
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Council will be requested to authorize the necessary
construction contract for the upgrade of the Buckingham Estates Lift Station.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Buckingham Estates Lift Station is located at the
intersection of South Staples and Yorktown Boulevard. Currently, it does not have
adequate reserve pump capacity and must be upgraded to accommodate growth on the
south side of the City.
Prior to proceeding with the lift station's capacity upgrade, it was decided that alternatives
should be analyzed. The analysis included determining the feasibility of relocating the lift
station to a less visible site. The Buckingham Estates Lift Station presently pumps to Lift
Station No. 5 located at South Staples and Saratoga Boulevard. Lift Station No. 5 pumps
to the large capacity wastewater trunk main located at the intersection of Saratoga and
Cimmaron Boulevards,
Two primary rome main routes were analyzed and it was determined that Route 2 (shown
in Exhibit C) was the preferred, cost efficient route. It will be necessary to acquire 17 utility
easements to complete the construction of the force main at this location.
The analysis concluded that it was more cost-effective to upgrade the current facility. The
expense of acquiring right-of-way along South Staples and extending an 18-foot deep
sanitary sewer line were prohibitive. Additionally, the study found large elements of the
existing lift station could be utilized in the upgrade.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This phase of the project will include design, bid, construction
and additional phase services necessary to complete the upgrade of the Buckingham
Estates lift station. Construction inspection services for the lift station are included in this
contract.
CONTRACT SUMMARY/FEE: A contract summary and fee is attached as Exhibit "B".
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 1
CONTRACT SUMMARY
BUCKINGHAM ESTATES LIFT STATION
AMENDMENT NO. 1
The project shall be the rehabilitation of the Buckingham Lift Station at its present location at
South Staples Street and Yorktown Blvd. It will include construction of an 18" diameter PVC
force main along an alignment shown as "Route 2" and all improvements being described in the
Stage One Preliminary Engineering Report dated February 21, 2002
2. Design Phase. Upon approval of the preliminary phase, designated by
receiving written authorization to proceed from the City, the Engineer will:
a. participate in pre-design meeting(s) with representatives of the City
operating departments(s) and the Engineering Services staff as needed
and required to perfect the final design;
b. implement the engineering report recommendations including construction
sequencing, connections to the existing facilities, and restoration of
property and incorporate these plans into the construction plans.
Development of the construction sequencing will be coordinated with
Engineering Services staff;
c. prepare one set of Construction Bid and Contract Documents in City
preferred format (using City Standards as applicable) - including Contract
agreement forms, general conditions and supplemental conditions,
invitation to bid, instruction to bidders, insurance, bond raquiraments, and
preparation of other contract and bid related items; specifications and
drawings to fix and describe, for one bid, the size and character of the
entire Project.;
d. provide assistance to identify the testing, handling and disposal of any
hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered
during construction (to be included under additional services);
e. prepare final quantities and estimates of probable costs and probable
construction schedule;
f. furnish 10-copies 60% plans (plans only-identify needed specifications)to
the City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable
construction costs. Required with the 60% plans is a "Plan Executive
Summary" which will identify and summarize the project by distinguishing
key elements such as: · Pipe Size;
· Pipe Material, etc;
· Why one material is selected over another;
· Pluses of selections;
· Permit requirements and why;
· Easement requirements and why;
· Embedment type and why;
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 1 of 8
· Constructability, etc.;
· Specific requirements of the City;
· Standard specifications;
· Non-standard specifications;
· Any unique requirements;
· Cost, alternatives, etc. and
· Other items determined to be applicable or noteworthy.
g. assimilate all review comments, modifications, additions/deletions and
proceed to the 90% phase, upon notice to proceed;
h. furnish 10-copies 90% plans (plans only-identify needed specifications) to
the City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable
construction costs;
i. assimilate all review comments, modifications, additions/deletions and
proceed to the 100% phase, upon notice to proceed;
j. furnish complete construction bid and contract documents including
specifications for City staff review and approval. Provide one copy of
100% complete plans and bid documents to the City staff for review and
approval purposes with revised estimates of probable costs. Identify
distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected utilities including
City and all other affected entities, compile comments and incorporate any
requirements into the plans and specifications, and advise City of
responding and non-responding participants;
k. provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) measures to ensure
that submittal of the 60% and 100% complete plans and bid documents
with specifications accurately reflect the percent completion designated
and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by
City staff. The Engineer shall submit a letter declaring that all engineering
disciplines of all phases of the submittals have been checked, reviewed,
and are complete prior to submission, and include signature of all
disciplines including but not limited to structural, civil, mechanical,
electrical, etc;
I. upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services, provide one (1) set
(hard copy and electronic) of final plans and contract documents suitable
for reproduction (In City Format) and said bid documents henceforth
become the sole property and ownership of the City of Corpus Christi;
m. the City agrees that any modifications of the submitted final plans (for
other uses by the City) will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and
sealed by a registered engineer prior to re-use of modified plans;
n. prepare and submit monthly status reports with action items developed
from monthly progress and review meetings;
o. prepare a traffic control plan as required for the project; and
p. provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 2 of 8
The City staff will:
a. designate an individual to have responsibility and control for coordinating
activities for the construction contract awarded;
b. provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the
construction contract; and
c. provide the City's standard specifications, standard and special provisions,
forms, notices for contract and bid documents.
3. Bid Phase. The Engineer will:
a. participate in the pre-bid conference;
b. assist the City in solicitation of bids, identify prospective bidders, and
review of bids by solicited interests;
c. review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid
documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services'
approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors
of approved changes prior to bidding;
d. attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and
make recommendation concerning award of the contract; and
e. in the event the lowest responsible bidder's bid exceeds the project
budget as revised by the Engineering Services in accordance with the
Engineer's design phase estimate required above, the Engineer will, at its
expense, confer with City staff and make such revisions to the bid
documents as the City staff deems necessary to re-advertise that
particular portion of the Project for bids.
The City staff will:
a. arrange and pay for printing of all documents and addenda to be
distributed to prospective bidders;
b. advertise the Project for bidding, maintain the list of prospective bidders,
receive and process deposits for all bid documents, issue (with the
assistance of the Engineer) any addenda, prepare and supply bid
tabulation forms, and conduct bid opening;
c. receive the Engineer's recommendation concerning bid evaluation and
recommendation and prepare agenda materials for the City Council
concerning bid awards; and
d. prepare, review and provide copies of the contract for execution between
the City and the contractor.
4. Construction Phase. The Engineer will perform contract administration to
include the following:
a. participate in pre-construction meeting;
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 3 of 8
b. review for conformance to contrect documents, shop and working
drawings, materials and other submittals;
c. review field and laboratory tests;
d. previde interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the
contractor and authorize minor changes, which do not affect the
contractor's price and ara not contrary to the general interest of the City
under the contract;
e. make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project
inspector and contractor to observe the general progress and quality of
work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance
with the contract documents. This will not be confused with the project
representative observation or continuous monitoring of the progress of
construction;
f. prepare change ordere (coordinate with the City's construction division);
provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for
the contractor and authorize minor changes which do not affect the
contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City
under the contract;
g. make final inspection with City staff and provide the City with a Certificate
of Completion for the project; and
h. review construction "red-line" drawings, prepare record drawings of the
Project as constructed (from the "red-line" drawings, inspection, and the
contractor provided plans) and deliver to the Engineering Services a
reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r. 14 or later) of the record
drawings. All drawings will be CADD drawn using dwg format in
AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being
provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format
in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS
system.
The City staff will:
a. prepare applications/estimates for payments to contractor; and
b. conduct the final acceptance inspection with the Engineer.
B. Additional Services
This section defines the scope and compensation for additional services that may be
included as part of this contract, but the Engineer will not begin work on this section
without specific written approval by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for
Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be
negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The Engineer will,
with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, do the following:
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 4 of 8
Permitting. Furnish the Director of Engineering Services all engineering data
and documentation necessary for all required permits. The Engineer will
prepare this documentation for all required signatures. The Engineer will
prepare and submit all permits as applicable to the appropriate local, state,
and federal authorities, including but limited to:
a. TxDOT Permits/Amendments
b. Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission
Permits/Amendments
c, Texas Historical Commission (THC)
d. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
(TNRCC)
Right-of-Way (ROW) Acquisition Survey. The Engineer will review existing
ROW and easements to ascertain any conflicts and provide field ROW
surveys and submit ROW plats and descriptions for the City's use in the
acquisition process. All work must comply with Category l-A, Condition I
specifications of the Texas Society of Professional Surveyors' Manual of
Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. All work
must be tied to and conform with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS)
control network and comply with all TxDOT requirements as applicable.
Topographic Survey. Provide field surveys, as required for design including
the necessary control points, coordinates and elevations of points (as
required for the aerial mapping of the Project area - aerial photography by
City). Establish base survey controls for line and elevation staking (not
detailed setting of lines and grades for specific structures or facilities). All
work must be tied to and conform with the City's Global Positioning System
(GPS) control network and comply with Category 6, Condition I specifications
of the Texas Society of Professional Surveyors' Manual of Practice for Land
Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. Include reference to a
minimum of two (2) found boundary monuments from the project area.
Environmental Assessments
a. provide any environmental site evaluations and Archeology Reports
that are needed for the Project, and
b. identify and develop a scope of work for any testing, handling and
disposal of any hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that
may be discovered during construction.
Inspection Services. Provide continuous Project inspection services including
day-to-day detailed coordination with the City's staff and testing laboratory.
Start-up Services. Provide on-site services and verification for any and all
start-up procedures during actual start up of major Project components,
systems, and related appurtenances if needed and required.
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 5 of 8
o
Warranty Phase. Provide a maintenance guaranty inspection toward the end
of the one-year period after acceptance of the Project. Note any defects
requiring contractor action to maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, or replace
any improvement under the maintenance guaranty terms of the contract.
Document the condition and prepare a report for the City staff of the locations
and
conditions requiring action, with its recommendation for the method er action
to best correct defective conditions. Complete the inspection and prepare the
report no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the maintenance
guaranty period.
Public Participation. Participate in a public participation meeting with City
Staff. Prepare all necessary exhibits for presentation at the meeting.
SECTION il. ORDER OF SERVICES is amended to include the following:
I1. ORDER OF SERVICES
PROJECT SCHEDULE - STAGE ONE: Stage One - Complete
PROPOSED PROJECTSCHEDULESTAGETWO
TIME
April 23, 2002
September 1, 2002
December 15, 2002
February 1, 2003
March 17, 2003
ACTIVITY
Begin Design Phase
60% Submittal
'.Two weeks City Review)
90% Submittal
',Two weeks City Review)
100% Submittal
Two weeks City Review)
Final Submittal
March 31, & April 7, 2003 Advertise for Bids
April 28, 2003 Receive Bids
June 16, 2003 Begin Construction
May 16, 2004
Complete Construction
EXHIBIT "B"
Page6 of 8
SECTION III, FEES is amended to include the following:
III. Summary of Fees
Ao
Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the Engineer a fixed fee for providing
for all "Basic Services" authorized as per Exhibit "B". The fees for Basic Services
will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all
services outlined in Section II.B.1-5 above, and for all expenses incurred in
performing these services. For services provided in Section I.B. 1-5, Engineer
will submit monthly statements for basic services rendered. In Section I1.B.1-3
and 5, the statement will be based upon Engineer's estimate (and City
Concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the
time of billing. For services provided in Section ll.B.4, the statement will be
based upon the percent of completion of the construction contract. City will make
prompt monthly payments in response to Engineer's monthly statements.
Fee for Additional Services. For services authorized by the Director of
Engineering Services under Section II.C. "Additional Services" the City will pay
the Engineer a not-to-exceed fee as per Exhibit "B". For services provided in
Section II. C. 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6, the Engineer will submit monthly statements for
services rendered. For services provided in Section I1. C. 3, the statement will be
based on the percent completion at the construction contract. City will make
prompt monthly payments in response to the Engineer's monthly statements.
C. Summary of Fees.
See Fees as shown in the following table
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 7 of 8
LIFT STATION AT BUCKINGHAM (RFQ 99 - 01)
Project No. 7117
Amendment No. 1
April 8, 2002
Fees for Basic Services Stage 1
Engineering Report
Sub-Total Basic Services
Fees for Basic Services Stage 2
Design Phase
Bid Phase
Construction Phase
Sub-Total Basic Services Stage 2
BASIC SERVICES TOTAL
Fees for Additional Services
1. Permitting
2. ROW Acquisition Survey
3. Topographic Survey
4. Environmental Assessment
5. Inspection Services (Lift Station)
6. Start-up Services
7. Warranty
8. Public Participation
Additional Services Total
TOTAL CONTRACT
Original Amendment REVISED
Contract No. 1 TOTAL
$37,306 $0.00 I $37,306
$37,306 $0.00I $37,306
$0 $125,925 $125,925
0 5,590 5,590
0 36,505 36,505
$0 168,020 $168,02~
$37,306.00 $168,020.00 $205,326.0~
$0 $1,320 $1,32C
0 28,760 28,760
0 24,400 24,400
0 5,760 5,760
0 63,250 63,250
0 3,050 3,050
0 3,050 3,050
0 1,430 1,430
$0 131,020 $131,020
37,30615 299,04015 336,346
TOTAL AMENDMENT NO. 1:$299,040
EXHIBIT "B" I
Page 8of8
home'~bloiorProiects'~councilexhibits~exh7117.dw~
N
SEWE~ TRUNK
BUCKzNGHAI~ L~FT
STATZON
CITY PROJECT # 7117
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBZT "C"
BUCKINGHAM ESTATES LIFT STATION
"PREFERRED ROUTE (2)"
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERWCES
PAGE: I Of 1
DAW: 04/11/2002
14
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
April 16, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an
amendment to the architectural/engineering services contract with M. Arthur Gensler, Jr.
and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $46,060 short term parking pedestrian canopies and
vehicle inspection stations for the Corpus Christi International Airport Roadway and
Parking Lot Improvements project.
FUNDING: Funding is available from Airport Capital Improvement Funds.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented.
~..__el I~. 'Escobar[ P.E. " '
Director of Engineering Services
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
Exhibit C.
Background Information
Prior Council/Administrative Actions
Contract Summary
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The amendment provides the necessary design services to:
· Extend pedestrian canopies from the terminal into the short term parking lot; and
· Provide vehicle inspection stations for the short-term parking lot and rental car return
lot.
The amendment will provide two (2) additional canopies, which will provide covered
pedestrian walkways from the Terminal Building across the short term parking lot.
Pedestrian lighting will be incorporated as part of the canopies.
The amendment also allows for vehicle inspection stations permit the use of the short term
parking and rental car return lot. These stations are necessary due to the heightened FAA
secudty regulations. A substantial redesign of the parking lots would have otherwise been
required with increased walking distances and a reduced number of parking spaces. The
stations are designed to be compatible with the new Terminal design.
PRIOR COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS:
Numerous actions by the City Council and staff have been made for this complex project.
A list of the more significant actions is attached. See Exhibit B.
BOARD/COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Airport Board has reviewed the amendment and
recommended its approval.
EXHIBIT A
Page 1 of 1
H:\HOM E\KEVINS\GEN~AIR\N EWTERM~AE#12AWD.bkg.doc
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
Au,qust 25, 1998 - Resolution approving the financial feasibility plan to fund the five-year capital
improvement program for CClA including the terminal reconstruction program. (Res. 023426)
March 30, 1999 - Approval of recommended Terminal Reconstruction and Landside Development
concept at CClA. (M99-089)
April 20, 1999 - Motion to authorize City Manager to execute a contract for
architectural/engineering services with M. Arthur Gensler Jr. and Associates in the amount of
$2,225,000 for the CClA Terminal Building. (M99-105)
July 20, 1999 - Adoption of FY99-00 Capital Budget and 2000-2004 CIP Guide which included
Airport Project No. 1, Terminal Building Reconstruction, Airport Project No. 2, Terminal Apron
Construction, and Wastewater Project No. 22, Airpod Lift Station Relocation. (Ord. No. 023703).
December 21, 1999 - Approval of the Terminal Design Concept as presented by the Gensler
Team.
January 25, 2000 - Motion to authorize City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the
architectural/engineering services contract with M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. in the
amount of $72,095 related to the airport automated access control system (AACS) and closed-
circuit television (CCTV) system for the Terminal Reconstruction project. (M2000-027)
February 23, 2000 - Motion to authorize City Manager to execute a construction contract in the
amount of $1,575,000 with B. E. Beecroft Company, Inc. for temporary facilities for the Terminal
Reconstruction Program. (M2000-66)
May 23, 2000 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the
architectural/engineering services contract with M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. in the
amount of $180,700 related to the terminal apron construction, terminal re-construction, and lift
station relocation projects at Corpus Christi International Airport. (M2000-153)
Au,qust 221 2000 - Motion authorizing City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction
contract with Fulton/Coastcon in the amount of $16,472,000 for the Corpus Christi International
Airport Terminal Construction project. (M2000-292)
10.
November 21, 2000 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to the
architectural/engineering services contract with M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. in the
amount of $420,940 for the for the Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Construction
project (M2000-412).
11.
November 21, 2000 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a project liaison and
inspection contract with AGCM, Inc. in the amount of $196,400 for the for the Corpus Christi
International Airport Terminal Construction project. (M2000-413).
12.
November 21, 2000 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 1
(construction by-pass) with Fulton/Coastcon in the amount of $56,026.58 for the Corpus Christi
International Airport Terminal Construction project. (M2000-292)
13.
April 18, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 9 (substitution
of concrete in lieu of asphalt under open concourse areas) with Fulton/Coastcan in the amount of
$103,140.44 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Construction project. (M2001-
154).
14. May 29, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 12 (revision of
structural foundations to reflect field conditions) with Fulton/Coastcon in the amount of
$38,618.74 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Construction project. (M2001-
207).
I EXHIBIT B
Page 1 of 4
H:\HO ME\KEVINS\GE N~AI R\N EWTE RM~AE#12AWDexh B.doc
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
June 12, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 8 to the
architectural/engineering services contract with M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. in the
amount of ($132,344) for the for the Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Construction
project (M2001-219).
September 11, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 19
(upgraded public address system, additional escalators, wall laminates, & decorative tiles) with
Fulton/Coastcon in the amount of $514,974.42 for the Corpus Christi International Airport
Terminal Construction project. (M2001-347).
October 9, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 22 (replace
eight (8) inch water line under commercial apron) with Fulton/Coastcon in the amount not to
exceed $155,449.01 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Construction project.
(M2001-373).
October 16, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment
No. 3 with AGCM in the amount of $598,500 for construction management, project liaison, and
inspection services for the new Airport Terminal Building (M2001-387).
October 23, 2001 -
a. Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 23 (additional filters on
cooling towers and addition of two manholes) with Fulton/Coastcon in the amount of
$20,326.24 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Construction project.
b. Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 24 (reduce depth of
relocated wastewater lift station, add 225 amp service, and provide exit lights for sliding doors
at front terminal entries) with Fulton/Coastcon in the amount of $23,490.93 for the Corpus
Christi International Airport Terminal Construction project. (M2001-401).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
1. January 17, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $24,071 to Fulton/Coastcon for
temporary vestibules, air curtains, and lighting.
2. January 22, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $19,121,55 to Fulton/Coastcon for
temporary canopy.
3. January 23, 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 4 to M. Arthur Gensler and Associates in the amount of
$14,000 for structural slab and double wall air handler units.
4. February 9, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 4 in the amount of $11,921.16 to Fulton/Coastcon for
various utility work, rerouting of conduits, and temporary speakers at curb-side.
5. February 14, 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 5 to M. Arthur Gensler and Associates in the amount
of $14,920 for apron extension/access roads & terminal apron projects. (separate project)
6. February 16, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 5 in the amount of $19,914.33 to Fuiton/Coastcon
for additional pedestrian tunnel support.
March 19, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 6 in the amount of $15,672.70 to Fulton/Coastcon for
storm drain repairs and removal, additional traffic markings and signage, and isolation of HVAC
piping and controls.
8. March 29, 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 6 to M. Arthur Gensler and Associates in the amount of
$14,900 for design of additional escalators, voice paging, plastic laminate, and decorative mosaic tile.
9. March 30, 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $15,000 to AGCM, Inc. for additional
inspection services.
lEXHIBIT B
Page 2 of 4
H:\HOME\KEVINS\GEN~I R\NEWTE RM\AE#12AWDexhB.doc
10. April 2, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 7 in the amount of $5,974.87 to Fulton/Coastcon for
installation of piers for future installation of structural slab under the concourse.
11. April 13, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 8 in the amount of $14,495.95 to Fulton/Coastcon for
various electrical modifications and security alarms.
12.
May 41 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 7 to M. Adhur Gensler and Associates in the amount of
$5,280 for design of three (3) overhead coiling security grills and side-stream filter and isolation
valves for cooling towers.
13. May 10, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 10 in the amount of $19,340.74 to Fulton/Coastcon for
various mechanical modifications and modification of a pier cap.
14. May 22, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 11 in the amount of $22,253.97 to Fulton/Coastcon for
additional fill material and relocation of food court water meter.
15. May 22, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 13 in the amount of $23,381.00 to Fulton/Coastcon for
substitution of double wall air handlers in lieu of single wall air handlers.
16. June 211 2001 - May 22, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 14 in the amount of $23,636.11 to
Fulton/Coastcon for re-route of gas and water mains and addition of lithium bromide filters for chillers.
17.
June 25, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 15 in the amount of $19,995.02 to Fulton/Coastcon for
substitution of copper wound transformers in lieu of aluminum wound transformers and additional fill
material.
18. July 2, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 16 in the amount of $23,965.32 to Fulton/Coastcon for an
upgrade of passenger loading bridge carpet and remobilization of demolition contractor.
19.
July 5, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 1'7 in the amount of $13,119.75 to Fulton/Coastcon for
storage of advanced purchase equipment in bonded warehouse and Data Room and Tower Vault
Signal additions to facilitate relocation of tetephone and local area network (LAN).
20.
August 22, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 18 in the amount of $23,885.98 to Fulton/Coastcon for
raising the elevation of asphalt crosswalks and additional excavation and fill material under the old
restaurant area.
21.
September 4, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 20 in the amount of $21,597.31 to Fulton/Coastcon
for relocation of equipment for jet bridge power room, and baggage service office/additional operation
space for Continental Express.
22.
September 14, 2001 - Award of Change Order No. 21 in the amount of $24,686.88 to
Fulton/Coastcon for air conditioning shop space under concourse and additional power supply for
data and communication room equipment.
23. March 30, 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $15,000 to AGCM, Inc. for additional
inspection services.
24.
December 31, 2001 - Award of Amendment No. 9 to M. Arthur Gensler and Associates in the amount
of $20,850 for design alternatives for wastewater lift station and aluminum panel details at security
checkpoint. ~
25. January 24, 2002 - Award of Amendment No. 10 to M. Arthur Gensler and Associates in the amount
of $10,500 for modification of security checkpoint location and electrical/security rooms.
26. February 19, 2002 - Award of Amendment No. 11 to M. Arthur Gensler and Associates in the amount
of $9,700 for extension of the Terminal Building Main canopy.
EXHIBIT B I
Page 3 of 4
H:\HOME\KEVINS\GEN~AIR\N EWTERM~AE#12AWDexh B,doc
27, October 31, 2001 - Award of Change Order No, 25 in the amount of $14,515,57 to Fuiton/Coastcon
for ground radio provider and Continental Airlines operations, three phase motors for baggage doors,
include baggage equipment on emergency power, revise cooling tower foundation, and relocate
water line to improve future access.
H:\HOME\KEVINS\GE N~AIR~N EWTERM~AE#12AWDexhB.doc
EXHIBIT B
Page 4 of 4
CONTRACT SUMMARY
AMENDMENT No. 12
Section II, SCOPE OF SERVICES, Paragraph G. ADDITIONAL SERVICES, will be amended by the addition
of item 19 - Shod Term Parking Pedestrian Canopies and Vehicle Inspection Stations (Short Term Parking
and Rental Car Return)
G. ADDITIONAL SERVICES-
19.
Shod Term Parking Pedestrian Canopies and Vehicle Inspection Stations - The Consultant will produce
construction documents for the CCIA Roadway and Parking Lot Improvements (Project No. 1019)
Contract to include:
· Pedestrian canopies at the shod term parking area;
· One (1) vehicle security checkpoint at entrance to short term parking area;
· One (1) vehicle security checkpoint at entrance to rental car parking area;
· Lighting design for canopies and security check points;
· Cause their electrical engineering subconsultant to design canopy lighting, security lighting, and
electrical power for vehicle security checkpoints; and
· Cause their structural engineer subconsultant to design the foundations, columns, and structure at
the canopies and vehicle security checkpoint booths and access control equipment.
The fee was revised by the addition of $46,060 for task 19. The total fee summary is:
Original Contract
Tasks Description Fee
Basic Services
I I.A. 1 Preliminary Phase 103,400
II.A.2 Schematic Design Phase 389,000
II.A.3 Design - Construction Document Phase 1,192,000
II.A.4 Bid Phase 30,000
Basic Service Subtotal 1,714,400
Construction Services
ll.B.1 Construction Phase 293,600
ll.B.2 Record Drawings 5,200
Construction Service Subtotal 298,800
Post Construction Services
II.C Post Construction Phase 5,000
Post Construction Services Subtotal 5,000
Fixed Fee Total 2,018,200
Travel & Courier Charges 206,800
TOTAL 2,225,000
Amendment No. 1
G.1 Access Control & Security System 72,095
TOTAL 2,297,095
Exhibtt C [
Page 1 of 3
/' ['[ ........... T ....
Amendment No. 2
G.2 Apron Expansion 110,100
G.3 Multi-Zone HVAC 18,900
G.4 Wastewater Lift Station Re-location 51,700
Amendment No. 2 Subtotal 180,700
TOTAL 2,477,795
Amendment No. 3
B. 1.g Construction Phase 177,596
G.5 Wastewater LS Collection System Relocation 37,000
G.6 Parking Toll Plaza Structure 7,000
G.7 Temporary Baggage & Lease Vehicle Facility 21,000
G.8 Additional Cost Estimation 27,100
G.9 Communication and Security Services 16,400
G. 10 Construction Materials Engineering 134,844
Laboratory's Inspection & Materials Testing
Amendment No. 3 Subtotal 420,940
Amendment No. 4
G.11 I Concrete Structural Slab & Double Wall Air 14,000
Handling Units
Amendment No. 5
G.12 Apron Extension/Access Roads & Terminal 14,920
Apron
Amendment No. 6
G. 13 Additional Escalators, Voice Paging, Plastic 14,900
Laminate, and Decorative Glass Mosaic Tile
Amendment No. 7
G.14 I Overhead Security Grills, Sidestream Filter & 5,280
I
Isolation Valves
Amendment No. 8
G. 10 Construction Materials Engineering (132,344)
Laboratory's Inspection & Materials Testing
TOTAL 2,815,491
Amendment No. 9
G.15 Wastewater Lift Station Relocation Additional 15,750
Design
G.16 Aluminum Composite Panels at Temporary 5,100
Baggage Claim
Amendment No. 9 Total 20,850
Amendment No. 10
G. 17 Modification of Security Checkpoint Location 10,500
and Storage/Electrical Rooms
Amendment No. 11
G.18 I Main Canopy Extension 9,700
Exhibit C
Page 2 of 3 I
Amendment No. 12
G.19
Shod Term Parking Pedestrian Canopies and 46,060
Vehicle Inspection Stations
TOTAL 2,902,601
Exhibit C l
Page 3 of 3
15
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 1,2002
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance abandoning and vacating 1,000-square feet, of a 10-foot wide,
utility easement out of Lot 11, Block 8, Lantana Industrial Area; requiring the owner,
Turbonetics Engineering & Service, Inc., to comply with the specified conditions and replat
the property within 180 days at owner's expense; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: Turbonetics Engineering & Service, Inc. necessitates the closure of the utility
easement in order to construct a new building adjacent to their existing building within the
easement.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: City Charter requires Council approval to abandon and
vacate any portion of an easement.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: Owner must replat the property within 180 days at their
expense.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented on an
emergency basis.
~,~.'Angel R. Escobar, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Background Information
Exhibit B - Ordinance
Exhibit C - Site Location Map
h:/,../gen/ag0?Jesmt-clo/lanta na.m
I r ' II
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PURPOSE OF CLOSURE AND BACKGROUND:
KOR Construction, on behalf of Turbonetics Engineering & Service is requesting the
abandonment and vacation of a 1,000-square foot, 10-foot wide utility easement out of
Lot 11, Block 8, Lantana Industrial Area. The easement to be abandoned and vacated
is located in Zone I-2 within the city limits of Corpus Christi.
Turbonetics Engineering & Service, Inc. is requesting the easement closure for the
purpose of giving them the ability to construct a new building adjacent to their existing
building within the near future.
All public and franchised utilities were contacted. CPL has no objections to the closure
but will seek reimburstment if adjustments to their facilities become necessary. There
were no other objections regarding the proposed easement abandonment.
Staff recommends payment of the fair market value of $350.00 for the abandonment
and vacation of the total 1,000-square foot utility easement. The owner has been
advised of and concurs with the conditions of the easement abandonment and vacation.
EXHIBIT A
Mobile
Pork
HAMPSHIRE
HALL
LEOPARD
HAiMPSHIRE
HALL
SITE
1845 N. LEXINGTON
LOT 11
:> HOPKINS
NOT TO SCALE
AGNES
NORTH
10' U.E. TO BE
(1000 S.F.)
10' U.E.
EASEMENT CLOSURE
LOT11, BLOCK 8
LAHTANA IHDUSTRIAL AREA
02/14/02
ESTATE
EXHIBIT C
J GOVIND
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX. · CONSULTING ENGINEERS · (561)28g-1585,
AN ORDINANCE
ABANDONING AND VACATING A 1,000 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF
A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT OUT OF LOT 11,
BLOCK 8, LANTANA INDUST~AL AREA; REQUIRING THE OWNER,
TURBONETICS ENGINEE~JNG AND SERVICE, INC., TO COMPLY
WITH THE SPECIFIED CONDITIONS AND REPLAT THE PROPERTY
WITHIN 180 DAYS AT OWNER'S EXPENSE; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, there is a 1,000 square foot portion of a 10 foot wide utility easement out of Lot
11, Block 8, Lantana Industrial Area, as recorded in Volume 27, Page 14, Map Records Nueces
County, Texas, that the owner, Turbonetics Engineering and Service, Inc., (Owner), wishes to
have abandoned and vacated; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus
Christi to abandon and vacate said portion of the utility easement for all purposes, subject to the
provisions below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CH~STI, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. That the 1,000 square foot portion of a 10 foot wide utility easement out of Lot
11, Block 8, Lantana Industrial Area, as recorded in Volume 27, Pages 14, Map Records Nueces
County, Texas is abandoned and vacated for public use as a utility easement, subject to Owner's
compliance with the following specified conditions as part of the abandonment and vacation:
That payment of fair market value by Owner be made in the amount of $350.00 for the
vacating and abandonment of this portion of the 10 foot wide utility easement.
The Owner must replat the portions of Lantana Industrial Area being abandoned and
vacated within 180 days at Owner's expense; provided however, the City Engineer may
extend the time limit for an additional 180 days if extenuating circumstances outside the
Owner's control necessitate an extension.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five council members, copy attached,
the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action
necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the
Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so
that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the
16th day of April, 2002.
\\CITYHALL02\USERS\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~WORD\ORD-Lantana.doc
ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
Legal form approved /~;/ /[
James R. Bray, Jr.
City Attorney
,2002
Joseph H~ey---'
Assistant City Attorney
\\CITYHALL02\USERS\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~WORD\ORD-Lantana.doc
~
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: March 26, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Motion approving the purchase of 77 laptop computers from Dell Computer
Corporation in accordance with the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing program for the total
amount of $199,926.65. The equipment is for the Police Department funded through the COPS
MORE grant.
ISSUE: Purchase ofthe equipment is necessary to move forward with implementation ofthe COPS
MORE grant to provide additional technology to personnel.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Police Department was awarded a COPS MORE grant in
October 2001 to fund the purchase of mobile computing units, personal computers, crime analysis
software and video imaging software. These laptops will be issued to officers in the Criminal
Investigation, Special Services, and Organized Crime Divisions for use in the field as well as at their
desks. A committee of officers representing these divisions reviewed several brands of laptops and
chose the Dell laptop computer Latitude C810. The purchase includes a three year warranty.
The purchase is sole source through the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing program.
FUNDING: Funds are available from the COPS MORE grant.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of purchase.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of purchase.
MAR. iS.E002 4:25PM DELL CO~PUTER M0.974 P.1/6
State & Local Govt Sales
FAX No. 1-800-433-9527
PHONE No. 1-800-981-3355
DeiJ WeD Site addrp, ss:' l~t~: //wwn. w.delt, com/S, Jfl
Dell Representative: ~ ext.~
Pages: /'/) (induciing cover sheet)
To: - ~n~:~,'+ 55~.~*-
Phone Number:
YOUR DIP, ECT RELATIONSHIP WTTH DELL COMES
Vvl'T'H MORE THAN,3UST A Ptq.
Direct Re/at/on~h/p wlE~ your PC PlanuPa~u~r
Bail has I:ecome one of the largest PC manufacturar~ In the courltty W having a direct relationship with our
customers. We know cur product Ifke no one else cari ~acausa we design, cle~ek:l~, nlanufacture, market,
service aha support it right ~e~a in Austin, T~xns. We offer a t:rCacl pr~duC~ line of Pent~um-~sed parsun~l
computers, nateb~:l~ and seiners as well as prhlter% peripherals and software. As part of our d~re~
ralatlogship with our customers, ~ur proCucts ara cus'cam-¢orlflGured according ~ your requirement3.
! F r II''
PlM~. l~d. ~00~ ~: ~Pr'I DEL~ CO~'~PUTER
?~ ~:~,~ CWO. 9?4 P. 2×6
Pa~ t ol
DeLLC COM
Dlt8:8PIS/Q,2 3~4(h,84 PM
~OrAL QU ,OTE AMCUJNT:
QUOTA TION
QUOTE #: 78484004
Customer #: 14338740
Quote Date: 3/1BK)2
Customer Nsme: CORPUS CHRIgTI POLICE DEPT
Ground ..,--.
96~JB,1 OlMN, BDRAM fnr Deft L,~ C~1W~61W~40~CI~0 NotMmok~,F,,et~y hl~t~l (~t-
Ny, on Oinylng Oa~ far I~11 ~ I~I~/C.aQ~ ~IO/~IO/P.a~O
Produnt
Quantity Unit
grP://eu~mdor~f~xap03/qr/quo~ion, a~?qa=78494004&l~T~O/~,010879<=4$~LQ=N
3/18/02
Number af 8 & A Itern~: 2
TOTAL QUOTE AMOUNT;
Tmc:
S&A Total Amount. $188.98
. flen you arm ~qiCly lo pl~oe ur Ol'CIg. You
and t~ m~ a~ ~lld In t~ U,S, only and are 8~J~
'-~'-e --"~ -"'~ rj_n_~_.n~m_; aery; _c~e..~.e..~ mrna.very 8ervlmm group far EPA oO lent
-tm,.., ~,=_m-a..qaN~,eeeVery~l~ell,gaen, Minimum quantltbe may apply, mid po~al
lttP ,'//ausadomafaxap03/qr/q~otagon.asp?qn---T8494004&P,.N_-~,420101179&L
3/18/02
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: March 26, 2002
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the amount of
$140,688 in funding from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug
Control Policy, to support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal Corridor
Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area.
B. Ordinance appropriating $140,688 in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants fund from the
Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the
Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High
Intensity Drug Trafficking Area; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: The Office of National Drug Control Policy provides funding each year for the City to
participate in the Texas Coastal Corridor High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Initiative
(HIDTA).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Corpus Christi Police Department is in the sixth year
as a participant in the Texas Coastal Corridor High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Initiative
created by the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy. The
grant provides for the salary and benefits of a full-time program analyst, one administrative
assistant, overtime for 4 Corpus Christi Police Officers, radio airtime/maintenance, and lease
vehicles.
The program focuses on this specific geographic area because it serves as a conduit for narcotics
into Corpus Christi and other metropolitan cities as well as a location for money launderers to
conduct illegitimate businesses with a consumer base that affects the local population with
residual crime. Other agencies participating are the Nueces County Sheriff, Texas Department of
Public Safety, Drug Enforcement Administration, Internal Revenue Service, U. S. Customs, and
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The initiative focuses on the identification and
disruption of narcotics trafficking organizations operating in the counties of Aransas, San Patricio,
Refugio, Nueces, Kleberg, Kenedy, Jim Wells, Brooks, and Victoria. It is anticipated that
shipments of narcotics through this area will be disrupted and long entrenched families of
narcotics traffickers will be apprehended. The profits from the sales of narcotics will be identified
and seized and the intelligence gathered will be downloaded and shared with other Drug
Trafficking Initiatives across the country.
FUNDING: There is no match required by the City.
P(~varez, Jr
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Award Letter x
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY
Washington, D.C. 20503
February 8, 2002
Chief Pete Alvarez, Jr.
Corpus Christi Police Dept.
321 John Sartain Street
Corpus Christi, TX 78403
Dear Chief Alvarez, Jr.:
We are pleased to inform you that an Award, Grant Number #I2PHNP517, has been
approved in the amount of $140,688.00. This award to the Corpus CNisti Police Dept. will
support Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative initiative(s) at the Houston High Intensity Drug
Trafficking Area (HIDTA).
The original and one copy of the Award with Special Conditions are enclosed. If you
accept this award, sign both the Award and Special Conditions and return a copy to The
National HIDTA Assistance Center in Miami. Keep the original copy of the Cooperative
Agreement Award and Special Conditions for your file.
By accepting this award, you assume certain administrative and financial responsibilities
including the timely submission of all financial and programmatic reports, resolution of all
interim audit findings, and the maintenance of a minimum level of cash-on-hand. Should
your organization not adhere to the terms and conditions of this award, it is subject to
termination for cause or other administrative action as appropriate.
If you have any questions pertaining to this grant award, please feel free to contact Phuong
DeSear at 202-395-6739.
Kurt F. Schmid
National HIDTA Director
Enclosures
'l F [ 'I' '
Executive Office of the President
Office of National Drug Control Policy
1. Recipient Name and Address
Corpus Christi Police Dept.
321 John Sartain Street
Corpus Christi, TX 78403
AWARD
Cooperative Agreement
3. Project Title
Texas Coastal Conidor Initiative initiative
Pagelof6
4. Award Number: 12PHNP517
5.Project Period: 1/1/2002 to 12/31/2002
Budget Period: 1/1/2002 to 12/31/2002
IA. Recipient IRS/Vendor No. 6. Date: 2/8/2002 7. Action
2. Subrecipient Name and Address 8. Supplement Number ~] Initial
FI Supplemental
2A. Subrecipient IRS/Vendor No. 9. Previous Award Amount
10. Amount of This Award $140,688.00
12. Special Conditions (Check, if applicable)
11. Total Award $140,688.00
[~-] The Cooperative Agreement approved subject to such conditions or limitations as are set
is
forth on the attached ~5 page(s).
1. Statutory Authority for Grant: Public Law 107-67
AGENCY APPROVAL
14. Typed Name and Title of Approving ONDCP
16. Sig
Official
Kurt F. Schmid
RECIPIENT ACCEPTANCE
15. Typed Name and Title of Authorized Recipient
Official
Office of National Drag Control Policy
:ure pproving O P O ~cial
18. Accounting Classification Code
17. Signature of Authorized Recipient ] Date
19. HIDTA AWARD
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $140,688 1N THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS
FUND FROM THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE
OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY TO SUPPORT THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT'S ROLE IN THE TEXAS COASTAL CORRIDOR
INITIATIVE IN THE HOUSTON HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING
AREA; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRIST1,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That $140,688 is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund from the
Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police
Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug
Trafficking Area.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the
City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for
the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2)suspends the Charter rule that requires
consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed
and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of ,
2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED ~ I
James R. Bray, J~.
City Attorney
,2002
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
By:
Lisa Aguilar~'~3
Assistant City Attorney
H:LLEG-DIR\LISA\ORD3\ORD3.485
· ! ~ . ~.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: April 2, 2002
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee, to execute an interlocal agreement
with the Housing Authority of the City of Corpus Christi (Authority) for the Corpus Christi
Police Department to provide supplemental police services to the Authority on a voluntary
overtime basis, for a period of twelve months and not to exceed $125,176, to improve the
efficiency and productivity of governmental resources; and declaring an emergency.
B. Ordinance appropriating $15,166 from the Housing Authority of the City of Corpus Christi
(Authority) for supplemental police patrol at the Authority in the No. 1020 General Fund-
Police Department; amending ordinance number 024528 which adopted the FY 01/02 budget
to increase both revenue and appropriations by $15,166 to the No. 1020 General Fund-Police
Department; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: The Housing Authority of Corpus Christi has funding available for supplemental patrols to
create a drug and crime free environment and to provide for the safety and protection of the residents
in its public housing developments.
BACKGROUND: The overtime Housing Authority Patrol (HAP) began in 1990 when the Housing
Authority approached the City for law enforcement support in their developments funded through a
HUD Drug Elimination Program grant. The Police Department agrees to provide sixteen (16) Police
officers weekly, on an overtime basis, to perform specialized patrols to enforce all state and local laws
as well as Housing Authority Rules as specified in the contract. Each officer participating will
complete a 4-hour shift, at a time and on a day of the week that is mutually agreeable between the
Police Department and the Housing Authority. Both parties will jointly prepare a detailed plan of
operation to reduce drug related and gang related crime. Officers are responsible for providing the
Housing Authority with information regarding their daily contacts, referrals, suspicious persons, and
other criminal activity they may have encountered during their tour of duty. The contract is for 12
months with services beginning as soon as Council approves the contract.
FUNDING: The Police Department operating budget was increased by $110,010 for the previous
contract; therefore only an additional $15,166 needs to be appropriated into the Police General Fund
to reimburse overtime expenditures.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Acceptance of the contract.
RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends acceptance of the contract.
Chief of Police
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAl.
Contract is available in City Secretary Office for review
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE
AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI (AUTHORITY) FOR THE CORPUS
CHRISTI POLICE DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL
POLICE SERVICES TO THE AUTHORITY ON A VOLUNTARY
OVERTIME BASIS, FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE MONTHS, AND NOT TO
EXCEED $125,176.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute an Interlocal
Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Corpus Christi (Authority) for the Corpus
Christi Police Department to provide supplemental police services to the Authority on a voluntary
overtime basis, for a period of twelve months, and not to exceed $125,176.
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
Legal form approved
James R. Bray, Jr.
City Attorney
,2002;
By:
Lisa Aguilar ~
Assistant City Attomey
AN ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $15,166 FROM THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI (AUTHORITY) FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
POLICE PATROL AT THE AUTHORITY IN THE NO. 1020 GENERAL
FUND-POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
024528 WHICH ADOPTED THE FY 2001-2002 BUDGET BY INCREASING
BOTH REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $15,166 IN THE NO. 1020
FUND
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI:
SECTION 1. That $15,166 from the Housing Authority of the City of Corpus Christi
(Authority) is appropriated in the No. 1020 General Fund-Police Department to provide
supplemental police patrol at the Authority.
SECTION 2. That Ordinance No. 024528, which adopted the FY 2001-2002 budget is
amended by increasing both revenues and appropriations by $15,166 in the No. 1020 General Fand-
Police Department.
SECTION 3. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate
action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the
Charter role that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings
so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this
the day of ,2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
LEGAL
FORM APPROVED
JAMES R. BRAY, JR.
CITY ATTORNEY
By: ~ ~
Lisa Aguilar
Assistant City Attorney
2002;
H:X&EG-DIR~LISA\ORD3 \ORD3.4 8 8
I ~' I Ir '
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
April8,2002
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee, to execute an
agreement with Texas A & M University Corpus Christi in the amount of $36,320 for
professional services to expand the Police Departments current technology through enhanced
geographical information systems/mapping of motor vehicle thefts.
ISSUE: The Police Department has grant funds available to enhance our current geographical
information system databases to focus on motor vehicle thefts.
BACKGROUND: Texas A&M at Corpus Christi will develop an enhanced geographical
information system database to focus on the problem of motor vehicle theft. A graduate student in
the GIS program will provide the GIS and AVL overlays that will allow the use of computerized
maps to show location of hot spots for motor vehicle thefts as well as the location of recovery.
The GIS technician and Crime Analyst at the Police Department will prepare reports on a daily
basis for the street officers to utilize; this will enhance our efforts to curtail motor vehicle thefts in
the City. The agreement will terminate on August 31, 2002.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the agreement.
FUNDING: Funds are available from the Auto Theft Task Force Grant, 1050-822300.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the agreement.
Attachments
Contract with Texas A&M
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
AND TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI
Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi has established a proactive Auto Theft Unit to focus on the
detection and apprehension of suspects;
Whereas, the City desires to use the services of the Texas A&M University Corpus Christi GIS
department to expand the City's current technology through enhanced geographical information
systems/mapping of both the location of the stolen vehicles and recovery location;
Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings, the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas and Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi agree as follows:
Description and Scope of Work
Texas A&M University Corpus Christi ("University") will develop an enhanced geographical
information system database to focus on the problem of motor vehicle theft in Corpus
Christi. The database will be provided to City by August 31, 2002.
Deliverables
A graduate student in the University GIS program will create the GIS and AVL overlays that
will allow the use of computerized maps to show location of hot spots for auto thefts as well
as the location of recovery. The mapping will also allow police officers to follow the bait
vehicle with the existing City AVL system.
Texas A&M University Staff
The University will provide a graduate student (Student) to perform the services required
herein and an administrator, (Administrator), Dr. Jeffries, who will oversee this project.
4. Nondisclosure Agreement.
During this Agreement, the University will have access to confidential information of
the Corpus Christi Police Department. This information may include information
contained in the CCPD Computer Aided Dispatching System and Records
Management System ("Confidential Information").
The University will use the CCPD Confidential Information only for the purposes of
this Agreement. Any requests to the University for disclosure of the Confidential
information will immediately be mailed to CCPD Captain Leonard Scott.
The University shall maintain the confidentiality of the CCPD Confidential
Information and take reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure
or use of the CCPD Confidential Information. The University is permitted to
disclose the CCPD Confidential Information only to the Student and Administrator
who are working on the Auto Theft GIS Project, provided that the University
confirms that the Student and Administrator have executed the attached
Nondisclosure Agreement And Nofication of Criminal Penalties for Unauthorized
Disclosure of Governmental Record (Exhibit 1).
Broach of this Section 4.0 by the University or breach of the Nondisclosure
Agreements by the Student or Administrator are grounds for City to terminate this
Agreement immediately, without written notice to University. Should City terminate
this Agreement for such breach, University will, within 30 days of termination,
refund all funds paid by City to University under this Agreement.
Cost
Texas A&M University-Kingsville will perform services identified herein and as stated in
their Proposal for cost of $36,320, fixed price. The breakdown of cost is identified in the
attached proposal, labeled Exhibit 2.
Termination
This Agreement will terminate on August 31,2002. This Agreement may be terminated by
either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. This Agreement may also be terminated
pursuant to Section 4 above.
Upon termination, University will return all hardware, software, data, provided by City to
University for the Auto Theft GIS project.
Notice
For purposes of written notification, all written notices shall be as follows:
City of Corpus Christi Police Department
321 John Sartain
Corpus Christi, Texas 78403
Attn: Captain Leonard Scott
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
Attn: Dr. Jeffries
6300 Ocean Drive
Corpus Christi, Texas 78412
Appropriation of Funds.
The City and Texas A&M University-Kingsville acknowledge that payments each will make
in accordance with the terms of this agreement shall be made from current revenues available
to the City and Texas A&M University-Kingsville respectively, and any future payments
shall be subject to appropriations.
General Provisions
A. The parties hereto shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws.
B. This Agreement may be modified or amended provided that such modification or
amendment is in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the City and Texas
A&M University-Corpus Christi.
C. If for any reason any section, word, phrase or provision of this Agreement is held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other
word, phrase or provision of this Agreement.
Execution of Agreement
Execution of this Agreement shall not result in a binding agreement until it is signed by a
duly authorized representative of Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and a duly
authorized representative of the City of Corpus Christi.
AGREED TO BY:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
By:
Name: George K. Noe
Title: Deputy City Manager
Date:
Name;
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI
By: ~ ~ ~'~-O~2.
Title:Dean of Gr~ldt Studies/^~rP Research
Date: 3/26/02
ATTEST
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
Approved this day of
James R. Bray, Jr., City Attorney
By:
Lisa Aguilar, Asst. City Attorney
EXHIBIT 1
Nondisclosure Agreement and Notification of Criminal Penalties
for Unauthorized Disclosure of Governmental Record
Name of University Student/Personnel:
Title:
[Name of University Student/Personnel] acknowledges that, as a condition of working on the
City of Corpus Christi Auto Theft GI S Project, [name] will necessarily receive access to confidential
Corpus Christi Police Department information, "CCPD Information". The CCPD Information may
include records from the CCPD Computer Aided Dispatching System and Records Management
System.
[Name] agrees that all CCPD Information provided for this Auto Theft GIS Project will be
used only to create the GIS and AVL overlays that will allow the use of computerized maps to show
location of hot spots for auto thefts as well as the location of recovery. Any other use or any
distribution of the CCPD Information is specifically prohibited and unauthorized. [Name]
agrees that he or she will not use any CCPD Information for his or her own benefit, that he or she
will not disclose any of the information to third parties, including any other students or University
personnel who do not have a need to know the information, and he or she will take care to guard the
security of the information at all times.
[Name] acknowledges that the CCPD Information meets the definition of Government
Record set forth in 37.01 of the Texas Penal Code, as amended. [Name] acknowledges that there
are criminal penalties for unauthorized use or unauthorized disclosure of government records.
Such penalties are set forth in Texas Penal Code Section 39.02 and Government Code Section
411.085, as amended. Additionally, [Name] acknowledges that the unauthorized use or
disclosure of the CCPD information may subject the University and him/her to civil liability.
[Name] agrees that if he/she has any questions regarding distribution or use of CCPD
Information, he/she will immediately contact CCPD Captain Leonard Scott for direction.
Signature:
Printed Name:
Date:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF NUECES
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the
Notary Public
4
Day of ,2002, by
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE
AN AGREEMENT WITH TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI
IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,320 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO
EXPAND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S CURRENT TECHNOLOGY
THROUGH ENHANCED GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
SYSTEMfMAPPING OF MOTOR VEHICLE THEFTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute an agreement
with Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi in the amount of $36,320 for professional services to
expand the Police Department's current technology through enhanced geographical information
systems/mapping of motor vehicle thefts. A copy of the agreement is on file in the office of the City
Secretary.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Approved this the l 0 day of ~
James R. Bray, Jr.
City Attorney
By: L~a A, A~ilar,~
Assistant City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
The City of Corpus Christi
to ,2002.
LOA~res.054
20
'! ~
-~RDLMANCE ~-TATU S
AGENDAITEM:
Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances Chapter 53-Traffic, Section 53-250,
Schedule I, One-Way Streets and Alleys, Section (A), by establishing a one-way traffic
pattern on Riverwood Drive in the Northbound Direction of Travel from F.M. Highway 624
(Northwest Boulevard) to River Hill Ddve, at all times; providing for penalties; providing for
severance; and providing for publication.
FIRST READING:
March 26, 2002
Passed: 9-0 (Unanimous vote)
FINAL READING:
April 16, 2002
COMMENTS:
(None)
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
One-Way Traffic Pattern
on Riverwood Drive
DATE: March 15, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances
Chapter 53 - Traffic, Article VIII Schedules, Section 53-250 - Schedule I, One-way
Streets and Alleys, Section (a), by establishing a one-way traffic pattern on Riverwood
Drive in the northbound direction of travel from F.M. Highway 624 (Northwest
Boulevard) to River Hill Drive, at all times.
ISSUE: An increasing number of traffic accidents are occurring at the F.M. 624
(Northwest Boulevard) intersection with Riverwood Drive. Errant traffic movements by
motorists turning from Riverwood Drive onto F.M. 624 is the overwhelming type of re-
curing collision. A solution to this type accident is converting Riverwood Drive to a on-
way traffic pattern in the northbound direction from F.M. 624 to River Hill Drive.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: One-way traffic patterns on any public street or alley
must be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the proposed ordinance as presented.
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL:
1. Background Information
2. Exhibit I - Site Map
AgMemRiver~vood 1-Wy.302
'Angel R. Escobar, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
One-Way Traffic Pattern on Riverwood Drive
Page I of 3)
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Additional Background Information
BACKGROUND:
Beginning in 1999, the intemection of Riverwood Drive @ F.M. 624 began to experience
an increasing number of 'right-angle' collision accidents. Virtually all of the accident
experience has been caused by motorists making left turns from Riverwood Drive
eastbound onto F.M. 624. Most of the motorists charged with the accident were
caused by the motorists either blatantly running the STOP sign on Riverwood or
misjudging the speed of approaching traffic on F.M 624. The speed limit on F.M. 624 is
50 MPH at this location. The accident experience at this intersection is uniquely high
compared to other intersections on F.M. 624.
Staff's analysis of the traffic conditions has included site inspection, discussion with the
Texas Department of Transportation, and consultation with the City's Police
Department. The consensus is that the traffic accident experience at the
Riverwood/F.M. 624 intersection can be substantially reduced by making Riverwood a
one-way street to accommodate only motorists turning onto Riverwood from F.M. 624.
Remedy of the traffic accident experience by installation of traffic signal control is not
considered a cost-effective solution:
The exiting traffic volume on Riverwood Drive is only 900 vehicles per day, a volume
that is comparable to that existing on many residential streets.
r~ The same type of collision would potentially still occur with Riverwood Drive
remaining two-way, with signal control.
[] Alternatively, the City's Master Plan for Traffic Signal Improvements provides for
signal control at the nearby River Hill Drive intersection at F.M. 624, which is a
higher capacity and higher functional street compared to Riverwood Drive.
Impact on AbuttinR Development.
sparse:
r~
[]
Developed property abutting Riverwood Drive is
The property along the full east side of Riverwood is completely undeveloped
One (1) residential property and one (1) and driveway access to the New Life Baptist
Church are the only developed properties on the west side of Riverwood.
A survey of abutting properties has not revealed any opposition to the proposed one-
way pattern on Riverwood.
Impact on Neighborhood Streets. The probable traffic impact of the proposed one-
way traffic pattern on neighboring streets considers the volume of traffic presently
traveling in the opposing direction of the proposed one-way pattern. The directional
traffic demand on Riverwood Drive is 1,400 vehicles in the direction of the proposed
one-way and 900 vehicles per day in the direction opposing the proposed one-way.
One-Way Traffic Pattern on Riverwood Drive
Page 2 of 3)
The 900 vehicles per day that would be re-directed orginates from River Hill Drive onto
Riverwood Drive. Riverwood Drive provides a convenient short-cut from River Hill
Drive to F.M. 624 and is not an essential route. Subsequently, the 900 vehicles per
day that would continue to use River Hill Drive to F.M 624 would very easily be
accommodated by the traffic capacity of River Hill Drive (which presently has a demand
of 700 vehicles per day at F.M 624). River Hill Drive is a fully-improved residential
collector roadway which has an exiting traffic volume capacity of 3,000 vehicles per day.
One possible, but unlikely, problem with implementation of the one-way proposal on
Riverwood Drive is the possibility of stacking traffic on the River Hill Drive exit to FM.
624. This could result in some circuitous redirection of traffic onto Reagan Drive, Powell
Drive and Pinnacle Drive. This would have to be monitored but could be eliminated by
an 'access restriction' to Reagan Drive effected through the City's Residential Traffic
Management Program.
Review by Transportation Advisory Committee. The Transportation Advisory
Committee has reviewed the Staff recommendation and unanimously voted to
recommend approval to the City Council.
Review by Texas Department of Transportation. The Director of Transportation
Operations with the Texas Department of Transportation concurs with the Staff's
recommendation.
Review by Nei.qhborhood Association. The Wood River Home Owners Association
has endorsed the proposed one-way proposal.
One-Way Traffic Pattern on RivenNood Drive
Page 3 Of 3)
EXHIBIT 111" SITE: MAP
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ONE-WAY TRAFFIC PATTERN Traffic Engineering Div.
ON RIVERWOOD DRIVE Engineering Services Dept.
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 53-
TRAFFIC, SECTION 53-250, SCHEDULE I, ONE WAY STREETS
AND ALLEYS, SECTION (A), BY ESTABLISHING A ONE-WAY
TRAFFIC PATTERN ON RIVERWOOD DRIVE IN THE
NORTHBOUND DIRECTION OF TRAVEL FROM F.M.
HIGHWAY 624 (NORTHWEST BOULEVARD) TO RIVER HILL
DRIVE, AT ALL TIMES; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI:
SECTION 1. That the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi is amended by
amending Chapter 53- Traffic, Section 53-250, Schedule I, One way streets and alleys,
Section (a), by establishing a one way traffic pattem on Riverwood Drive in the
northbound direction of travel from F.M. 624 (Northwest Boulevard) to River Hill Drive,
at all times.
CHAPTER 53 TRAFFIC
ARTICLE VIII. SCHEDULES
Sec. 53-250. Schedule I - One-way streets and alleys.
Street or Direction
Portion of Street of Traffic
Riverwood Drive, F.M. 624 (Northwest Boulevard) to
River Hill Drive ........................................... North
SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word
or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment
of a court of competem jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph,
subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite
intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase,
word or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose.
ORD-Trf-RvrwdDr.doc
2
SECTION 3. Publication shall be made one time in the official publication of the City
of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 4. Penalties are as provided in Sec. 53-55 Code of Ordinances.
ORD-Trf-RvrwdDr.doc
That the for~goin, g ordinall~ ~vgs read for t,he first time and passed to its second reading
on this the ~ ~aay of !/~/I. tg.A~J.q ,2002, by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the
__ day of ,2002, by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brem Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of
,2002.
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
Approved as to legal form this the Lo day of &
James R. Bray, Jr., City Attorney
,2002;
By:
~ [ Attorney
Joseph H~ey, Assay
ORD-Trf-RvrwdDr.doc
21
~ ,' [I[~
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
March 21, 2002
AGENDAITEM:
ITEM A:
Motion to amend the Annexation Calendar by changing the 2nd Reading date
for the Annexation Ordinance and the date of the City Council public hearing
and approval of zoning from April 9, 2002 to April 16, 2002. The effective
date of annexation is changed from April 10, 2002 to April 17, 2002.
ITEM B:
Approval of an ordinance on First Reading annexing five tracts of land
containing 519.32 acres and referred to as:
Tract 1: Jones, Walter and GLO Beach Frontages: Publicly and privately
owned lands comprising approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of gulf
beach frontage, from the south most property line of Padre Balli County Park
to a point 500 feet south of the south most property line of the Lawrence
Jones property. The width of the strip extends westward from the City Limit
Line on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above Mean
Sea Level based on United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) and
Geodetic Survey (G.S.) datum of 1929, to a point along the vegetation line
approximately 200 feet west of and generally parallel to the 1.37-foot line
above Mean Sea Level Gulf of Mexico shoreline.
Tract 2: Padre Balli Park: Nueces County Park #1 (Padre Balli Park)
comprising approximately 194.92 acres and 8,324 feet of gulf beach
frontage.
Tract 3: Packery Channel Park Area: Public and privately owned lands
comprising approximately 50.01 acres and including Nueces County Park#2
(Packery Channel Park).
Tract 4: Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island State Park:
Publicly owned tract of land comprising 221.00 acres and 4,211 feet of gulf
beach frontage surrounded by the existing City Limits and out of the William
Bryan Survey 806, between the east right-of-way line of State Highway 361
and the existing City Limit line along the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the
1.37-foot line above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum of
1929.
Tract 5: Beach Front Property North of Zahn Road: Privately owned (Eric
C. Lower) tract of land comprising approximately 9.23 acres and 2,009.79
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1 ST Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 2
feet of gulf beach frontage abutting the City Limits on the Gulf of Mexico
shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S.
and G.S. datum of 1929 and extending approximately 200 feet westward,
and between County owned land and State leased land at JP Luby Surf
Park.
BACKGROUND ANDISSUES:
ITEM A:
A motion to amend the annexation calendar is necessary since the City
Council decided to cancel the April 9, 2002 City Council meeting. The 2na
Reading of the Annexation Ordinance will occur on April 16, 2002. If City
Council approves the Annexation Ordinance, the effective date for the
annexation(s) will be April 17, 2002.
ITEM B:
Background: Annexation is essential for the City to achieve orderly growth.
Currently, no land use controls (zoning) and most city land use policies
cannot be applied to outside city limits properties. Annexation is used to
extend the City's zoning regulations consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
adopted City growth policies; and Article 31, newly annexed territory of the
Zoning Ordinance. Zoning is a tool to create compatible land use patterns in
the community. Annexation also allows the City to ensure that when growth
occurs all new structures are constructed in accordance with building,
plumbing, electrical, and other City codes designed to protect the public
health, safety and welfare. In addition, annexation should occur so that
impacted areas may benefit from the expansion of public health programs,
police and fire protection, and by linking new development to publicly
approved water supplies, wastewater, and storm drainage systems.
Issues: Annexation of these tracts will alleviate jurisdictional problems
regarding law enforcement, fire protection and other service issues.
Jones, Walter and GLO Beach Frontages: Mr. Lawrence Jones has
submitted a request that the City annex the Gulf Beach on this property (See
Attached Letter). The City agrees with Mr. Jones acknowledgement in his
letter, "... that the level of beach cleaning and maintenance...will remain
at a minimal level until the development of our adjacent property takes
place". Kleberg County also agrees that beach cleaning levels should be at
minimal levels until the adjacent property is developed. Staff has included Dr.
Waiter's property between Padre Balli County Park and the Jones property.
In addition, the proposed annexation includes additional Gulf Beach property
extending to a point 500 feet south of the Jones property line and owned by
the Texas General Land Office. Total beach frontage of these three
properties is 1.82 miles.
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1sT Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 3
Padre Balli Park: Padre Balli Park is currently outside City limits. The
county park contains approximately 6,324 feet of Gulf Beach frontage.
Under State Statute, the County will continue to be responsible for
maintenance of the Gulf beach after annexation into the City. In addition, all
maintenance and operations relative to the park will continue to be the
responsibility of the County after annexation.
Packery Channel Park Area: Nueces County Appraisal District records
indicate that the Packery Channel Park area includes two parcels of publicly
and privately owned property comprising 50.01 acres. One parcel is 20.01
acres in size, is wholly owned by Nueces County, and known as Packery
Channel Park or Nueces County Park #2. The other parcel contains 30.00
acres and three owners jointly hold an undivided interest in the property as
follows:
· Nueces County 64% undivided interest
· Crown Petroleum Company c/o Michael
undivided interest
· Francis I. Gandy, Jr. 18% undivided interest
James Kruger 18%
All maintenance and operations relative to the park will continue to be the
responsibility of the County after annexation.
Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island State Park: This property
is owned by Nueces County except for a 2-acre strip of land on the northern
edge of the tract that was recently deeded or in the process of being deeded
to Mustang Island State Park. The purpose of this annexation is to annex all
outside city limits properties and eliminate confusion with regard to the City
and County's jurisdiction, particularly with regard to law enforcement issues
and traffic operations issues on Newport Pass Road. By State Statute, the
County will continue to be responsible for maintence of the gulf beach
adjacent to their property.
Beach Frontage North of Zahn Road: This privately owned (Eric C. Lower)
property is a 0.38 mile strip of gulf beach immediately north of Zahn Road
and J.P. Luby Surf Park. Annexation of this privately owned (Eric C. Lower)
tract would require the City to maintain the gulf beach. Annexation will help
to simplify law enforcement jurisdictional issues on a high use area of Gulf
Beach.
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1sT Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 4
Revenue and Costs: Staff does not anticipate any significant property tax revenue
from these five tracts, as they are either publicly owned parks or undevelopable gulf
beaches.
Costs for these areas will come from:
Police Protection
The Police Department has estimated that the City should budget an
additional $10,000 dollars per year in over time costs for services during
major beach events such as Beach to Bay, Sea Sculpture, and Spring Break.
Park and Recreation
Park and Recreation has indicated that they will absorb the costs for 2.20
miles of beach cleaning on the Jones, Walters, and Lower tracts.
Street Department
The Street Department and Traffic Engineering Division have indicated that
signage costs will be minimal for the annexation areas and will be absorbed
by the Departments.
Total annual costs for annexation are estimated to be $10,000.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
February 26, 2002 - 2nd Required City Council Annexation Public Hearing
February 19, 2002 - 1st Required City Council Annexation Public Hearing
January 15, 2002 - City Council Motion authorizing staff to prepare annexation service
plans and approval of an annexation calendar
December 11, 2001 - 2nd Reading of an Annexation Ordinance for the 2001 Annexation
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1sT Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 5
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
Item A: Motion to approval as presented.
Item B: Approval of an Annexation Ordinance on First Reading annexing five tracts of land
containing 519.32 acres.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
Director of Planning
Attachments
Attachment I:
Attachment II.
Attachment III.
Attachment IV.
Attachment V.
Property Owner Request for Annexation
Annexation Maps
Annexation Profiles
Annexation Calendar
Service Plan
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1s~ Reading
March 21,2002
Page 6
Attachment I. Property Owner Request for Annexation
VISTA DEL. MAR ~RRIGATION COMPANY
~ovamber29,2001
1201 Leopta'd gtl~t
C~lma O=tstl, T~ 75401
D~r Sirs:.
As th~ own~ of tim 1,~0,57 ~ m~t ef laud 1o~'~,~-~ south
tha~ the ~ of beach e..Im~,,g and mH,~aam:e, ~, will nmmin ~t a vn{,a,~,v level
umtl the d~velopment of oar ~ljaoe~ p,,,~ty lv~ccs plv~m.
We believe th~ the ~ of ~!s ship of ~ will ~ save the pulffio
lntm~ ~ pmvkle ~o~ the m'dm'ly devologm~ of this az~
~md as ~'~xmea ~d on behalf of
Vista Del Ms~r Irdgaliml Company
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation lS* Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 7
Attachment II. Annexation Maps
GULF OF
MEXICO
Jones, Walter, and GLO Beach Frontage Padre Balli Park
5
Packery Channel Park Area
Nueces County Land South of
Mustang Island State Park
and
Beach Frontage North of Zahn Road
(Eric C. Lower)
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1st Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 8
Attachment II1: Annexation Area Profiles
Nueces County Land South
of Mustang Island State
Beach Frontage North of
Total
519.32
22,163
0
City Council Agenda Memorandum
Annexation 1sT Reading
March 21, 2002
Page 9
Attachment IV. Annexation Calendar
January 15,2002
City Council motion approving a public hearing schedule and
directing Staff to prepare service plans for areas under
consideration for annexation.
February 19, 2002
City Council - Presentation of Service Plans and 1st Public
Hearing (regular meeting).
February 26, 2002
City Council - 2nd Public Hearing (regular meeting).
March 13, 2002
Planning Commission conducts a public hearing to consider
zoning of proposed annexation areas.
March 26, 2002
City Council- st ·
I Read ng of the annexabon ordinance (regu ar
meeting).
April 16, 2002
City Council - 2nd Reading of the annexation ordinance and
final action on proposed zoning (regular meeting).
April 17, 2002
Effective date of annexation.
Page 1 of 17
AN ORDINANCE
ANNEXING PADRE AND MUSTANG ISLAND TRACTS: ANNEXING 9,618
FEET OF PADRE ISLAND Gulf BEACH FRONTAGE TRACTS OWNED BY
JONES, WALTER & GLO (44.16 ACRES) AND PADRE BALLI PARK (NUECES
COUNTY PARK NO. 1) (t94.92 ACRES AND 6,324 FEET OF GULF BEACH
FRONTAGE ON PADRE ISLAND), IN THE VICINITY OF THE
NUECES-KLEBERG COUNTY LINE; ANNEXING PACKERY CHANNEL PARK
(NUECES COUNTY PARK NO. 2) AND ADJOINING PRIVATE LAND
(APPROXIMATELY 50.01 TOTAL ACRES FOR PARK AND PRIVATE LAND)
ON PADRE ISLAND; ANNEXING 221 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF MUSTANG
ISLAND STATE PARK , COMPRISING 4,211 FEET OF GULF BEACH
FRONTAGE ON MUSTANG ISLAND, OWNED BY NUECES COUNTY;
ANNEXING 9.23 ACRES OF LAND NORTH OF ZAHN ROAD AND J. P. LUBY
SURF PARK, COMPRISING 2,009.79 FEET OF GULF BEACH FRONTAGE ON
MUSTANG ISLAND, OWNED BY ESTATE OF ERIC C. LOWER; PROVIDING
THAT EACH ANNEXED TRACT IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LIMITS OF
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI; PROVIDING FOR A SERVICE PLAN FOR
THE ANNEXED TRACTS OF LAND; PROVIDING THAT THE OWNERS AND
INHABITANTS ARE ENTITLED TO ALL RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, AND
BURDENS OF OTHER CITIZENS AND PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI AND ARE SUBJECT TO AND BOUND BY THE CITY
CHARTER, ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, AND RULES; REQUIRING
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFJCATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR NONCONFORMING
USE; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi desires to annex to the City of Corpus Chdsti an area
comprising five tracts of land on Padre Island and Mustang Island herein called Tracts 1 through
5, inclusive. These Tracts are also described, respectively, as (1) the Jones, Walter, and GLO
Beach Frontage; (2) Padre Balli Park; (3) Packery Channel Park Area; (4) Nueces County
owned land south of Mustang Island State Park; and (5) the Estate of Eric C. Lower beach
frontage north of Zahn Road and J. P. Luby Surf Park. Tracts 1 and 2 are in the vicinity of the
Nueces-Kleberg County line;
WHEREAS, on February 19th, 2002, and on February 26th 2002, public hear ngs were held by
the City Counc, during a regularly scheduled City Council meeting held in the Council
Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi,;
WHEREAS, before each hearing, the City published in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City of Corpus Christi, and posted on the City's internet website, a notice of each hearing; and
each hearing was held for the consideration of annexation proceedings and the service plan for
the defined lands and territory; and during each hearing all persons interested in the
annexations were allowed to appear and be heard;
L EGAL~LAW~EG-DIR\DoyleDC u rtis~VlYDOCS~2002~P&ZO R D02~An n exat i o n. o rd ~DDC2002\O rd U ones. G LO. E dcl.owe r. B ea ch. Co La n d. &Parks. o rd. doc
Page 2 of 17
WHEREAS, a service plan for the area proposed to be annexed was made available for public
inspection and explained at the public hearings on February 19th, 2002, and on February 26th,
2002
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Council that the territory now proposed to be
annexed lies wholly within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Corpus Christi;
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Council that the territory now proposed to be
annexed abuts and is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Corpus Christi;
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Council that the territory now proposed to be
annexed constitutes lands and territories subject to annexation as provided by the City Charter
of the City of Corpus Christi and the laws of the State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it would be advantageous to the City and to its citizens
and in the public interest to annex the lands and territory hereinafter described.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the following described Tract I located south of Padre Bali Park and adjacent
to the Nueces-Kleberg county line, located partly in Kleberg County and partly in Nueces
County, Texas, is annexed to, brought within the corporate limits, and made an integral part of
the City of Corpus Christi. Tract 1 is also described by metes and bounds in Exhibit A and by a
map in Exhibit F attached to this ordinance and which are incorporated herein by reference.
Tract 1: Jones, Walter and GLO Beach Frontages: Privately and publicly owned lands
comprising approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of gulf beach frontage on Padre Island,
from the south most property line of Padre Balli County Park to a point 500 feet south of the
south most property line of the Lawrence Jones property. The width of the strip extends
westward from the City Limit Line on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above
Mean Sea Level based on United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) and Geodetic Survey
(G.S.) datum of 1929, to a point along the vegetation line approximately 200 feet west of and
generally parallel to the 1.37-foot line above Mean Sea Level Gulf of Mexico shoreline.
SECTION 2. That the following described Tract 2 located on Padre Island, north of and adjacent
to the Nueces-Kleberg county line and east of Park Road 22, located entirely in Nueces
County, Texas, is annexed to, brought within the corporate limits, and made an integral part of
the City of Corpus Christi. The tract is also described by metes and bounds in Exhibit B and by
a map in Exhibit F attached to this ordinance and which are incorporated herein by reference.
Tract 2: Padre Balli Park: Nueces County Park #1 (Padre Balli Park) comp, rising approximately
194.92 acres and 6,324 feet of gulf beach frontage on Padre Island.
SECTION 3. That the following described Tract 3 located on Padre Island, north of Villa Maria
Isabel and northeast of Park Road 22 and Park Lane and extending to the Packery Channel,
located entirely in Nueces County, Texas, is annexed to, brought within the corporate limits, and
made an integral part of the City of Corpus Christi. The tract is also described by metes and
LEGAL~AW~I..EG-DIR~Doyle DC u rtis~lYDOCS~2002~P&ZO RD02~A a nexat ion. o rd~DDC2002\0 rcPJ ones. G LO. E ri ct.owe r. Be a ch. CoLa n d. &Pa rks. o rd. doc
Page 3 of 17
bounds in Exhibit C and by a map in Exhibit F attached to this ordinance and which are
incorporated herein by reference.
Tract 3: Packery Channel Park Area: Publicly and privately owned lands on Padre Island
comprising approximately 50.01 acres and including Nueces County Park #2 (Packery Channel
Park).
SECTION 4. That the following described Tract 4 located on Mustang Island, south of Mustang
Island State Park, located entirely in Nueces County, Texas, is annexed to, brought within the
corporate limits, and made an integral part of the City of Corpus Christi. The tract is also
described by metes and bounds in Exhibit D and by a map in Exhibit F attached to this
ordinance and which are incorporated herein by reference.
Tract 4: Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island State Park: Publicly owned tract of
land comprising 221.00 acres and 4,211 feet of gulf beach frontage on Mustang Island
surrounded by the existing City Limits and out of the William Bryan Survey 606, between the
east right-of-way line of State Highway 361 and the existing City Limit line along the Gulf of
Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S.
datum of 1929.
SECTION 5. That the following described Tract 5 located on Mustang Island, located north of
Zahn Road and east of State Highway 361, and located entirely in Nueces County, Texas, is
annexed to, brought within the corporate limits, and made an integral part of the City of Corpus
Christi. The tract is also described by metes and bounds in Exhibit E and by a map in Exhibit F
attached to this ordinance and which are incorporated herein by reference.
Tract 5: Beach Front Property North of Zahn Road: Privately owned (Estate of Eric C. Lower)
tract of land comprising approximately 9.23 acres and 2,009.79 feet of gulf beach frontage on
Mustang Island, abutting the City Limits on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line
above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum of 1929 and extending
approximately 200 feet westward, and between County owned land and State leased land at JP
Luby Surf Park.
SECTION 6. That there is approved, as part of this annexation ordinance, a service plan. The
service plan, in Exhibit G of this ordinance, is incorporated into and made a part of this
ordinance. The service plan provides for the same number of services and levels of service for
the annexed area and to the same extent that the services are in existence in the area annexed
immediately preceding the date of annexation or that are otherwise available in other pads of
the city with topography, land uses and population densities similar to those reasonably
contemplated or proj~ected in the area annexed.
SECTION 7. That the owners and inhabitants of the tracts or parcels of land annexed by this
ordinance are entitled to all the rights, privileges, and burdens of other citizens and property
owners of the City of Corpus Christi, and are subject to and bound by the City Charter of the
City of Corpus Christi, and the ordinances, resolutions, motions, laws, rules and regulations of
Page 4 of 17
the City of Corpus Chdsti and to all intents and purposes as the present owners and inhabitants
of the City of Corpus Christi are subject.
SECTION 8. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use. An
application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed within thirty (30)
days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 9. That the official map and boundaries of the City and its extraterritorial jurisdiction,
previously adopted and amended, are amended to include the territories described in this
ordinance as part of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
SECTION 10. That the City Manager or his designee is directed and authorized to perform or
cause to be performed all acts necessary to correct the official map of the City and its
extraterritorial jurisdiction to add the territory annexed as required by law.
SECTION 1'1. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or
provision of the ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of
competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause,
phrase, word or provision of this ordinance for it is the definite intent of this City Council that
every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof be given full
force and effect for its purpose.
SECTION 12. This ordinance goes into effect at 12:01 A. M., April 17, 2002.
Page 5 of 17
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
William Kelly
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this
the 26th day of Mamh, 2002, by the following vote:
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the 16th
day of April, 2002, by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
VVilliam Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 16th day of April, 2002.
ATTEST:
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Mamh 21, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.,
City
Doyle D./l~rtis
Senior A~sistant City Attorney
LEGAL~J-AVv~LEG-D~R~D~y~eDcurtis~MYD~cS~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Annexati~n~rd~DDc2~2~rd~J~nes~GL~EricL~wer.Beach`c~Land~&Parks~rd.doc
Page 6 of 17
EXHIBIT A
METES AND BOUNDS FOR
PADRE ISLAND
TRACT 1
Tract t: Jones, Walter and GLO Beach Frontages: Tract 1 consists of privately and publicly
owned lands comprising approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of gulf beach frontage on
Padre Island, from the south most property line of Padre Balli County Park to a point 500 feet
south of the south most property line of the Lawrence Jones property. The width of the strip
extends westward from the City Limit Line on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot
line above Mean Sea Level based on United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) and Geodetic
Survey (G.S.) datum of 1929, to a point along the vegetation line approximately 200 feet west of
and generally parallel to the 1.37-foot line above Mean Sea Level Gulf of Mexico shoreline.
Tract 1 is located south of and adjacent to the Nueces-Kleberg county line and is located
entirely in Kleberg County, Texas. Tract 1 is more particularly described by metes and bounds
as follows:
44.16 acres, more or less, consisting of a part of an 18.07 acre tract described in Document No.
840580, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, a part of a 37 acre tract described in Document
No. 1998050703, Nueces County, Texas Deed Records, a part of a 1260.57 acre tract out of the
Jose Maria Tovar Subdivision of record in Volume 2, Pages 82 and 83, Kleberg County, Texas,
map records and a portion of beach frontage extending southwest 500 feet, more or less, from
the southwest line of the aforementioned 1260.57 acre tract, said 44.16 acres of beach frontage,
more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT on the vegetation line of the Gulf of Mexico side of Padre Island, a
point which bears southwest, 500 feet from a corner on the present city limit line established by
Ord. No. 024694, dated 12-31-01 (said corner being the point of intersection between the
vegetation line and the southwest line of the aforementioned 1260.57 acre tract) for the
southwest corner of the tract herein described;
THENCE northeasterly with the present city limit line, the vegetation line approximately 200 feet
west of and generally parallel to the shoreline of the Gulf of Mexico, to a point on the northeast
line of the aforementioned 37 acre tract, for a corner in the present city limit line and the
northwest corner of this tract;
THENCE southeasterly with the northeast line of said 37 acre tract, to a point on the 1.37 foot
line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of Padre Island with elevation based on
U.S.C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present city limit line established by Ord. No.
015415, dated 3-19-80 and the northeast corner of this tract;
THENCE southwesterly with said present city limit line, to a point in line with the point of
beginning, for the southeast corner of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly leaving said present city limit line at right angles thereto, to a point on
the vegetation line, for the point of beginning.
L EGAL~LAVV~LE G-DIR\Doy l eDCu rtis~Vl Y DOCS~2002~P &ZORD02~An n exati on. o rd~D DC 2002\Ord~J o n es. G LO. Eric, Lower. B ea ch. Co La nd, & P arks, ord. doc
Page 7 of 17
EXHIBIT B
METES AND BOUNDS FOR
PADRE ISLAND
TRACT 2
Tract 2: Padre Balli Park (Nueces County Park #1 ) comprises approximately 194.92 acres and
6,324 feet of gulf beach frontage on Padre Island, north of and adjacent to the Nueces-Kleberg
county line and east of Park Road 22, and is located entirely in Nueces County, Texas. Tract 2
is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
METES AND BOUNDS
(Padre Balli County Park)
194.92 acres, more or less, out of the Nicolas & Juan Jose Balli survey, A-1998, located south
of and adjacent to County Access Road No. 4, and east of and adjacent to Park Road 22, and
more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of the northeast boundary line of a 37-acre tract
described in Document No. 1998050703, Nueces County, Texas Deed Records and the east
right-of-way line of existing Park Road 22 (South Padre Island Drive), for a comer in the present
city limit line as established by Ordinance No. 024694. Dated December 31, 2001, and the
southwest corner of the tract here-in described;
THENCE northerly with the east right-of-way line of said Park Road 22, its curves and its angles
(the same being the present city limit line) to a point on the north right-of-way line of Access
Road No. 4, for a corner in said present city limit line, the northwest comer of Padre Balli County
Park and the northwest corner of this tract;
THENCE easterly with the north right-of-way line of said Access Road No. 4, the present city
limit line, to a point on the 1.37-foot line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of
Padre Island with elevation based on U.S.C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present
city limit line established by Ordinance No. 015415. Dated March 19, 1980, and the northeast
corner of this tract;
THENCE southwesterly with said present city limit, to a point in line with the northeast boundary
line of the aforementioned 37-acre tract, for the southeast comer of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly, leaving said present city limit line, with the northeast boundary line of
said 37-acre tract, to a point on the east right-of-way line of Park Road 22, for the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Page 8 of 17
EXHIBIT C
METES AND BOUNDS FOR
PADRE ISLAND
TRACT 3
Tract 3: Packery Channel Park Area: Tract 3 consists of publicly and privately owned lands on
Padre Island comprising approximately 50.01 acres and includes Nueces County Park #2
(Packery Channel Park). Tract 3 is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
METES AND BOUNDS
(Packery Channel County Park Area)
50.01 acres, more or less, consisting of 20.01-acre Packery Channel County Park, also known
as Nueces County Park No. 2, and a 30-acre tract described in Vol. 2229, page 155, Nueces
County, Texas, Deed Records, said 50.01-acre tract, more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of the southeast boundary line of Packery Channel
County Park and the northeast right-of-way line of Park Road 22 (South Padre Island Drive) for
the south corner of the tract herein described;
THENCE, northwesterly with the northeast right-of-way line of said Park Road 22, its curves and
its angles, to the south corner of Lot 5, Block 4, Padre Island - Corpus Christi Section 18, as
shown in Volume 57, Page 105, Nueces County, Texas, plat records, for the southerly west
corner of Packery Channel County Park, and an outside corner of this tract;
THENCE northeasterly with the southeast boundary line of said Lot 5, to its east corner thereof,
for an inside corner of Packery Channel County Park and an inside corner of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly, with the northeast boundary line of said Block 4, Padre Island - Corpus
Christi Section 18, its curves and its angles, to its north corner thereof, for the west corner of the
aforementioned 30-acre tract, an inside comer of Block 2, Padre Island - Corpus Christi Section
18, as shown in Volume 38, Page 69 and 70, Nueces County, Texas, plat records, and the west
corner of this tract;
THENCE northeasterly, with the line common to said Block 2, Padre Island - Corpus Christi
Section 18 and the aforementioned 30-acre tract, to a point on the westerly shoreline of existing
Packery Channel, for the north corner of this tract;
THENCE southeasterly, with the meanders of said westerly shoreline of existing Packery
Channel, to a point, for the east corner of Packery Channel County Park, and the east corner of
this tract,
THENCE southwesterly, with the southeast boundary line of said Packery Channel County Park,
to a point on the northeast right-of-way line of Park Road 22, for the POINT OF BEGINNING.
LEGAL~_AV~ALE G-DIR~Doyle DCu rtisWIy DOCS~2002~P&ZO RD02~An nexation, o rd~DDC2002~O rcl~J ones. G LO. E ricLowe r. Bea ch, CoLa nd. & P arks, ord. doc
Page 9 of 17
EXHIBIT D
METES AND BOUNDS FOR
Mustang ISLAND
TRACT 4
Tract 4: Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island State Park: Publicly owned tract of
land comprising 221.00 acres and 4,211 feet of gulf beach frontage on Mustang Island
surrounded by the existing City Limits and out of the William Bryan Survey 606, between the
east right-of-way line of State Highway 361 and the existing City Limit line along the Gulf of
Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S.
datum of 1929. Tract 4 is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
METES AND BOUNDS
(Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island)
221.00 acres, more or less, out of the William Bryan survey No. 606, A-45, described in
Document No. 888926, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, located southwest of adjacent to
Mustang Island State Park, and more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, on the southeast right-of-way line of existing State Highway 361, the
north comer of a 137.73 acre tract, now or formerly owned by Eric C. Lower, described in
Document No. 956588, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, for the west corner of the tract
here-in described;
THENCE, northeasterly with the southeast right-of-way line of said State Highway 361, its
curves and its angles, to a point on the southwest boundary line of Mustang Island State Park,
for a point on the present city limit line established by Ordinance No. 15415, dated March 19,
1980, and the north corner of this tract;
THENCE, southeasterly, with said present city limit line, to a point on the 1.37 foot line above
mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of Mustang Island with elevation based on U.S.C. and
G.S. datum of 1929, for a corner in present city limit line and the east corner of this tract;
THENCE, southwesterly, with said present city limit line, to a point in line with the northeast
boundary line of the aforementioned 137.73 acre tract, for the south comer of this tract;
THENCE, northwesterly with the northeast boundary line of said 137.73 acre tract, to its north
corner thereof for the POINT OF BEGINNING.
LEGAL~W~EG~D~R~D~y~eDCurtis`dv~YD~S~2~P&Z~RD~2~Annexa~n~rd~DDC2~2~rdU~nes~GL~EricL~wer~Beach~Land~&Parks~rd~d~c
Page 10 of 17
EXHIBIT E
METES AND BOUNDS FOR
Mustang ISLAND
TRACT 5
Tract 5: Beach Front Property North of Zahn Road: Privately owned (Estate of Eric C. Lower)
tract of land comprising approximately 9.23 acres and 2,009.79 feet of gulf beach frontage on
Mustang Island, abutting the City Limits on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, being the 1.37-foot line
above Mean Sea Level based on U.S.G.S. and G.S. datum of 1929 and extending
approximately 200 feet westward, and between County owned land and State leased land at JP
Luby Surf Park. Tract 5 is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
METES AND BOUNDS
(Beach Frontage north of Zahn Road)
9.23 acres, more or less, out of the William Bryan survey No. 606, A-45, located southeast of
and adjacent to a 137.73-acre tract, now or formerly owned by Eric C. Lower, described in
Document No. 956588, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, said 9.23~acre tract more
particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of the southwest boundary line of said 137.73-acre
tract and the vegetation line along the Gulf of Mexico side of Mustang Island, a corner in the
present city limit line establish by Ordinance No. 023889, dated December 28, 1999) for the
southwest corner of the tract herein described;
THENCE, northeasterly, with said vegetation line, the present city limit line, to a point on the
southwest boundary line of a 221-acre tract, now or formerly owned by Nueces County,
described in Document No. 888926, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, for the northwest
corner of this tract;
THENCE, southeasterly with the southwest boundary line of said 221-acre tract, to a point on
the 1.37 foot line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of Mustang Island with
elevation based on U.S.C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present city limit line
established by Ordinance No. 015415, dated Mamh 19, 1980, and the northeast corner of this
tract;
THENCE southwesterly, with said present city limit line, to a point in line with the southwest
boundary line of the aforementioned 137.73-acre tract, for the southeast comer of this tract;
THENCE, northwesterly with the southwest boundary line of said 137.73 acre tract, to a point on
the vegetation line for the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Exhibit F Page 11 of 17
Tract I
Annexation Maps
Tract 2
Walter, and GLO Beach Frontage
Padre Balli Park
Jones,
Tract 3
Packery Channel Park
Tracts 4 & 5
Nueces County Land South of
Mustang Island State Park [Tract 4]
and
Beach Frontage North of Zahn Road
(Estate of Eric C. Lower) [Tract 5)]
Exhibit G Page 12 of 17
Service Plan for
Padre Island
and
Mustang Island
Tracts 1 Through 5
LEGAL~-AW~LEG-DIR~Doy leDC u r~is~IYDOCS~ 002~P&ZO RD02~,n n exati o n. ord~DDC2002\OrdU ones. (3 LO. E ricLowe r. Beach. CoLand. & P a Iks. ord. doc
Exhibit G Page 13 of 17
A=
B=
Service Plan for Padre Island and Mustang Island Tracts I Through 5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, finds and determines that this
Service Plan will not provide any fewer services or a lower level of service in the
annexation area than were in existence in the annexation area at the time immediately
preceding the annexation process. The service plan will provide the annexed area with a
level of service, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance that is comparable to the
level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance available in other part of
the municipality with topography, land use, and population density similar to those
reasonably contemplated or projected in the area.
Upon annexation of Padre Island and Mustang Island Tracts 1 Through 5, the City of
Corpus Christi will provide city services by any of the methods by which it extends the
services to any other area of the city. The City of Corpus Christi will assume maintenance
of any new public streets, curb and gutters, after construction and acceptance by the
City. Owners and/or developers of properties in the annexation area must comply with
State law as well as City zoning, platting, building code, flood hazard prevention and all
other code requirements.
CITY SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED IMMEDIATELY UPON ANNEXATION
1. Police Protection
The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and its Police Department will provide police protection
to the newly annexed area at the same level of service now being provided to areas of
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, with similar topography, land use and population
density. These services include:
Normal patrols and responses;
· Handling of complaints and incident reports;
· Special units, such as traffic enforcement, criminal
suppression, and special weapons and tactics team.
investigations, namotics, gang
The area will be included in a patrol district that will receive 24-hour patrol coverage and
primary patrol services with regularly scheduled officers.
2. Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Services
The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and its Fire Department will provide fire protection and
ambulance service to the newly annexed tracts at the same level of service now being
provided to other areas of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, with similar topography, land
use and population density. These services include:
Fire suppression and rescue;
LEGAL~LAVV~-EG-D~R~D~y~eDcurtis~YD~S~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Annexati~n~rd~DD~2~2\~rdU~nes~L~Eric~-~wer~Beach~C~Land~&Parks~rd.doc
Exhibit G Page 14 of 17
· Emergency medical services;
· Hazardous materials mitigation and regulation;
· Emergency prevention and public education efforts;
· Water rescue;
· Technical rescue;
· Construction plan review;
· Inspections;
· Emergency management planning;
· Rescue / hazardous materials unit.
These services are provided, on a citywide basis, by 395 employees operating from 15
emergency fire stations and other non-emergency sites. All Corpus Christi Fireflghters
are certified by the Texas Commission on Fire Protection.
Upon annexation the Corpus Christi Fire Department (CCFD) will provide service from
Fire Station #15 located at 14402 Commodore Drive. Fire Station #15 has five fireflghter
personnel on duty 24 hours a day. Three fireflghters are assigned to fire suppression
and two firefighters are available for emergency medical response. Every Fire Unit is
manned with at least one certified Emergency Medical Technician and every medical unit
is manned with at least one Certified Emergency Medical Technician and one Certified
Paramedic. If Station #15 is unavailable, CCFD will provide service from Station # 13 in
Flour Bluff. All pumper, ladder trucks, and rescue units carry Automatic External
Defibrillators for use with heart attack victims.
3. Solid Waste Collection
After the effective date of annexation the City of Corpus Christi will provide solid waste
services to single family residential customers directly or indirectly through a third party
contract. Services currently provided by the City for single-family residences include:
· Garbage collection;
· Recycling collection - curbside recycling collection for residential customers; materials
collected include newspaper, "junk mail," tin and aluminum can, glass bottles and jars,
plastic bottles;
· Brush pick up; and
· Large and bulky material pickup.
Commercial garbage collection service for businesses and multi-family residences is
available on a subscription basis from private service providers. The City of Corpus
Christi will allow commercial refuse collectors to continue providing this service to
condominium complexes, multi-family apartments and commercial establishments.
4, Operation and Maintenance of Water and Waste Water Facilities
~E~AL~`vV~-EG-D~R~D~y~eDCurtis~v~YD~cS~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Annexati~n~rd~DDC2~2\~rd~J~nes~GLO.EricL~wer~Beach.~Land.&Parks~ord.d~c
Exhibit G Page 15 of 17
Any and all water or wastewater facilities owned or maintained by the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, at the time of the proposed annexation shall continue to be maintained by
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Any and all water or wastewater facilities which may be
acquired subsequent to the annexation of the proposed area shall be maintained by the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Any and all water or wastewater facilities which may be
the property of another municipality or other entities after the annexation will continue to
be maintained by the municipality or entity. Existing water line mains at their current
locations shall be available for point of use extension based upon the current City's
standard water extension policies now existing or as may be amended. Individual septic
systems may be acceptable if City and County standards are met. No septic tank
systems are permitted between the vegetation line and the shoreline of the Gulf of
Mexico.
5. Operations and Maintenance of Roads and Streets
The City will maintain public streets over which the City has jurisdiction. Any and all
roads, streets or alleyways which are dedicated to and accepted by the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, or which are owned by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall be
maintained to the same degree and extent that other roads, streets and alleyways are
maintained in the City. Any and all lighting of roads, streets and alleyways which may be
positioned in a right-of-way, roadway or utility company easement shall be maintained by
the applicable utility company servicing the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, pursuant to the
rules, regulations and fees of the utility. Street Department services include:
· Emergency pavement repair; and
· Maintenance of public streets.
Following annexation, public streets for which the city has jurisdiction will be included in
the City's preventive maintenance program. Preventive maintenance projects are
prioritized on a Citywide basis and scheduled based on a variety of factors, including
surface condition, ddeability, age, traffic volume, functional class, and available funding.
Any necessary rehabilitation or reconstruction will be considered on a citywide priority
basis.
The Traffic Engineering Division of the Engineering Services Department will also provide
regulatory signage services in the annexation area. All regulatory signs and signals are
installed when warranted following an engineering study. All roadways are re-striped and
remarked and signage replaced as needed.
6. Operation and Maintenance of Parks, Playgrounds and Swimming Pools
Any park that may be under the responsibility of the County will be maintained by the City
only upon dedication of the park by the County to the City and City's acceptance of said
park. In the event any such parks, playgrounds or swimming pools do exist, and such
parks, playgrounds or public swimming pools are accepted as City owned public facilities
LEGALU-AVW-EG~D~R~D~y~eDCur~s1MYD~S~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Annexati~n~rd~DDC2~2~3rd~nes~GL~EdcL~wer~Beach`~Land~&Parks~rd~d~c
Exhibit G Page 16 of 17
by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, they will be maintained to the same extent and
degree that parks, playgrounds and swimming pools and other similar areas of the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas are maintained.
7. Operation and Maintenance of Beaches
After annexation, any beach that becomes the responsibility of the City will be cleaned
and maintained by the City unless the city contracts with another entity for beach
cleaning services. It shall be the responsibility of the City of Corpus Christi to create and
endorse plans for the maintenance, preservation and enhancement of public beaches
and public beach access. Because of infrequent use, the beach frontages located in
Kleberg County will require minimal maintenance and preservation. Beach cleaning and
maintenance for beaches owned by another public entity shall continue to be the
responsibility of that public entity.
8. Operation and Maintenance of Any Publicly Owned Facility, Building or
Municipal Service
The City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is not aware of the existence of any
publicly owned facility, building or other municipal service now located in the annexation
area. In the event any publicly owned facility, building or municipal service is dedicated to
and accepted by the City of Corpus Christi, the facility, building or municipal service will
be maintained to the same extent and degree that publicly owned facilities, buildings or
municipal services of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas are maintained.
CITY SERVICES
IMPROVEMENT
ANNEXATION
PROVIDED THROUGH THE ACQUISITION AND/OR CAPITAL
PROCESS WITHIN 2-112 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF
1. Police Protection
No capital improvements are necessary at this time to provide police protection. The City
Council finds and determines that it has at the present time adequate facilities to provide
the same type, kind and level of protection and service which is presently being
administered to other areas already incorporated in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas,
with the same or similar topography, land use and population density.
2. Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Services
No capital improvements are necessary at this time to provide fire protection. The City
Council finds and determines that it has at the present time adequate facilities to provide
the same type, kind and level of protection and service which is presently being
administered to other areas already incorporated in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas,
with the same or similar topography, land use and population density.
Exhibit G Page 17 of 17
3. Water and Wastewater Facilities
The City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, finds and determines that water
mains and wastewater collection lines exist within city limits which may be extended to
provide service within the area to be annexed pursuant to the City's standard service
extension policies now in existence or as may be amended by the City Council.
4. Street Extensions and Street Lighting
New development will be required pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, to provide internal and peripheral streets and to construct those streets in
accordance with the specifications required by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, for a
properly dedicated street.
Upon the effective date of annexation of the proposed area, the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, with a cooperative effort of the City's designated electric utility franchise company,
will undertake to provide the same degree of road and street lighting as is provided in
areas of similar topography, land use and population density within the present corporate
limits of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Maintenance of lighting for roads and streets
which are properly dedicated to and accepted by the City of Corpus Christi will be
consistent with the maintenance provided by the City to other roads and streets in areas
of topography, land use and population density similar to the annexed property.
D. SPECIFIC FINDINGS
The City of Corpus Christi will provide services to the newly annexed area in a manner
that is similar in type, kind, quantity, and quality to service presently enjoyed by the
citizens of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, who reside in areas of similar topography,
land utilization and population density.
22
· " r !lr ·
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: March 26, 2002
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept grant funding in the mount of
$57,202 from the Texas Department of Transportation for the Click It or Ticket (CIOT)
Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) for occupant protection enforcement overtime
within the Police Department and to execute ail related documents.
B. Ordinance appropriating $57,202 from the Texas Department of Transportation for funding
of the Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) within the
Police Department in No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: Because the state of Texas leads the nation in traffic fatalities and seasonai problems in
Texas regarding safety belt use are evident, Federai Highway Safety Funds are available to conduct
overtime enforcement to increase seat belt use.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The State of Texas, Department of Transportation is providing
funding for a new STEP program called Click It or Ticket (CLOT) where the Police Department will
conduct a two-week occupant protection enforcement effort during the Memoriai Day holiday and a
one-week effort during the Thanksgiving holiday. This project will increase safety belt rates through
enhanced enforcement and public information and education efforts.
During the two holiday seasons designated above, two teams of four officers each will work Monday
- Friday 7:00 am - 11:00 am and 4:00 pm - 8:00 pm and on Saturday, Sunday 10:00 am - 2:00 pm
and 4:00 pm - 8:00 pm on an overtime basis enforcing occupant protection laws across the City.
The goal of the grant will be to increase safety belt use among drivers and from seat passengers by
10%.
FUNDING: Officers will be working on an overtime basis with the State providing 100% o£eligible
funding o£the saiary, retirement, and mileage.
REQUlRED COUNCIL ACTION: Accepting the grant and appropriating funds.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the grant and appropriating the funds.
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAl,
Con~a~
[] Federal Pass '[hrough Misc. Contract __
Oram Funds CFDA ~20.60__ Charge Number
[] Sme Cram Funds PIN 17460005741000
TEXAS HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS **
THE COUNTY OF TRAVIS **
THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE BY and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department
of Transportation, hereinafter called the Department, and City of Cotpas Christi, hereinafter called the Subgrantee,
and becomes effective when fully executed by both pardes. For the purpose of this agreemanh the Subgrantee is
designated as a(n) local government.
AUTHORITY: Texas Transportation Code, Chapter 723, the Traffic Safety Act of 1967, and the Highway Safety
Plan for the following Fiscal Year(s) 2002 & 2003.
WITNESSETIt
Project Title: Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Selective Traffic Enfome, merit Program (STEP)
Brief Project Description: To conduct a two week occupant protection enforcement effort during the
Memorial DaV holiday and a one week effort during the Thanksgiving holidav.
AGREEMENT
Grant Period: The Grant becomes effective on March 1, 2002 or on the date of final signature, whichever is later,
and ends on December 3 L 2002.
Maximum Amount Eligible for Reimbursement: $57,202. Cost incurred after the endofafiscalyearcannot be
reimbursed without prior written approval from the Department. (Sec also Article 3, Limitation of Liability, in
the Standard Provisions)
Project Year: 2002
Labor
Other Direct Cost
Indirect/F&A Coat
TOTAL
Estimated Budget:
Federal
$ 56,275
927
$ 57,202
State Local
In addition to the Standard Provisions of the Agreement that follow, the following attachments are incorporated
as indicated as a part of the Grant Agreement:
[] Attachment A, Approved Project Description
[] Attachment B, Approved Project Budget
[] Attachment C, Standard Assurances
[] Attachment D, Debarment Certification
[] Attachment E, Lobbying Certification (required if mount payable is $100,000 or more)
[] Attachment F, Child Support Statement
Page 1 of lO 1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED DUPLICATE COUNTERPARTS TO
EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT.
THE SUBGRANTEE
THE STATE OF TEXAS
City of CorpusChfisti
[Legal Name of Agency]
Executed by and approved for the Texas
Transportation Commission for the purpose and effect
of activating and/or carrying out orders, established
policies or work programs approved and authorized by
the Texas Transportation Commission.
David R. Garcia, City Manager
[Name and Title]
District Engineer
Texas Department of Transportation
Date
Date 5 '7' 0~"
A/ITPJST:
[Signature]
[Name and Title]
Under authority of Ordinance or Resolution
Number (for local governments):
Director, Traffic Operations Division
Date
Mailing Addresses
For the purpose of this agreement, the following add~sses shall be used to mail all required notices, reports,
claims, and correspondence. (NOTE: For warrants, the address indicated by the mail code, last three digits of
the PIN on page 1, shall be used. If that address is not appropriate for warrants, please change the mail
code accordingly and notify TxDOT of any changes.):
For the Subgrantee:
For the Tex~s Department of Transportation:
P.Alvarez, Jr., Chief of Police
P. O. Box 9016
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469
Page 2oflO
1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
STANDARD PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF TIlE PARTIES
The Subgrantee shall undertake and complete the project as described in Attachment A, Approved Project
Description, and in accordance with all terms and conditions included heminat~er. The Department shall provide
assistance as appropriate and as specified in said Attachment A.
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION
A. The method of payment for this agreement will be based on actual costs incuzmd up to and not to exceed the
limits specified in Attachment B, Approved Project Budget. The amount included in the project budget will
be deemed to be an estimate only and a higher amount can be reimbursed, subject to the conditions specified
in paragraph B hereunder. If Attachment B, Approved Project Budget, specifies that costs are based on a
specific rate, per-anit cost, or other method of payment, reimbursement will be based on the specified method.
B. All payments made hereunder will be made in accordance with Attachment B, Approved Project Budget. The
Subgrantee's expenditures may not exceed any budget category in the Approved Project Budget by an mount
greater than 5% of the total reimbursable amount of the budget without a written agreement amendment.
Hmvever, the Subgrantee must provide written notification to the Department of a change of 5% or less, prior
to payment of the Request For Reimbursement that includes the change, indicating the amount and percent
change and the reason(s) for it. The maximum amount payable shall not be increased as a result of exceeding
a budget category without a written grant amendment.
C. To be eligible for reimbursement under this agreement, a cost must be incurred in accordance with
Attachment B, Approved Project Budget, witlfin the time frame specified in Grant Period on page 1.
D. Payment of costs incurred under fltis agreement is further governed by one of the following cost principles, as
appropfiata, outlined in the Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars:
· A-21, Cost Principles for Educational Institutions;
· A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments; or,
· A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.
E. The Subgrantee agrees to submit monthly or quarterly requests for reimbursement, as designated in
Attachment A, within 30 days after the end of the billing period. The Subgrantee will use billing statements
acceptable to the Department. The original billing statement and one copy is to be submitted to the address
shown on page 2 of this agreement.
F. The Subgrantec agrees to submit the final request for payment under this agreement within sixty (60) days of
the end of the grant period.
G. The Department will exercise all good faith to make payments within thirty days of receipt of properly
prepared and documented requests for payment. Payments, however, are contingent upon the availability of
appropriated funds.
Project agreements supported with federal funds are limited to the length of the agreement period and usually
do not receive extended funding beyond three years. If both the Deportment and the Subgrantec agree that
the project has demonstrated merit or has potential long-range benefits, the Subgrantee may apply for funding
assistance beyond the three year limit. To be eligible, the Subgrantee must lmve a cost assumption plan by
the end of the first twelve months. This plan will include a schedule for phasing in funding from its own
resources and the phasing out of funding support from the Department. All plans must be approved by the
Department before any extension beyond the three year limit will be granted. Preference will be given to
those projects for ~vhich the Subgrantee has assumed some cost sharing by the end of the first twelve months,
and to those ~vhich propose to assume the largest percentage of subsequetu project costs.
Certain categories of funds may be exempted by the federal government from the time limit requirement.
Unless exempted, all federally-funded agreements am considered to be subject to the time limit provision.
Funding support for all state-funded projects will be limited to the term of the agreement. Any extension
beyond that time will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis.
Page 3oflO 1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
ARTICLE 3. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Because funds are authorized on a fiscal year basis only, payment of costs incurred hereunder is contingent upon
the availability of funds.
fiat any time during the agreement period the Department determines that there is insufficient funding to continue
the project, the Department shall so notify the Subgrantee, giving notice of intent to terminate the agreement.
Such termination will be conducted in such a manner that will minimize disruption to the Subgrantee and the
Depamnent, and as further specified in General Provision G9, Termination.
The Subgrantee, if other than a State agency, shall be responsible for settlement of any and all claims and lawsuits
by third parties arising from or incident to the Department's non-payment of the Subgrantee's claim under this
agreement. The Subgrantee expressly acknowledges that its responsibility includes the payment of all damages,
expenses, penalties, fines, costs, charges, and attoruey fees, if the claims or lawsuits are based upon the
Department's non-payment of claims submitted under this agreement. The Subgrantee shall defend any suits
brought upon all such claims and lawsuits and pay ail costs and expenses incidental thereto, but the Department
shall have the right at its option to participate in the defense of any suit, without relieving the Subgrantee of uny
obligation hereunder.
ARTICLE 4. AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS
ff at any time during the agreement period the Department determines that additional funds are needed to continue
the project and the maximum amount payable is insufficient, a written amendment is to be executed to authorize
additional funds, if the Department and the Subgrantee determine to continue project funding.
Additionally, any changes in the agreement period, agreement terms or responsibilities or the parties hereto shall
be enacted by ~a-itten amendment executed by both parties.
The amendment sball be agreed upon by the parties to this agreement and sball state the change to the mutual
satisfaction of the parties. In no event will the agreement period be extended unless a written amendment is
executed before the completion date specified in Article 1.
ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL WORK
If the Subgrantee is of the opinion that any work it has been directed to perform is beyond the scope of this
agreement and constitutes additional work, the Subgrantee shall promptly notify the Deparlment in writing. In the
event that the Department finds that such work does constitute additional work, the Department shall so advise the
Subgrantee and provide compensation for doing this work on the same basis as the original work. lithe
compensation for the additional work will cause the maximum amount payable to be exceeded, a written
amendment will be executed. Any amendment so executed must be approved within the agreement period
specified on the cover page to this Grant.
ARTICLE 6. CHANGES IN WORK
When the approved project description requires a completed work product, the Department will review the work as
specified in the approved project description. If the Department finds it necessary to request changes in previously
satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof, the Subgrantee will make such revisions as requested and directed
by the Department. Such work will be considered as additional work and subject to the requirements established in
Article 5.
lithe Department finds it necessary to require the Subgrantee to revise completed work to correct errors appearing
therein, the Subgrantee shall make such corrections and no compensation will be paid for the corrections.
Page 4oflO 1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
ARTICLE 7. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Gl. Indemnification
To the extent permitted by law, the Subgrantec, ff other than a State agency, shall save harmless the Department
from ail claims and liability due to the acts or omissions of the Subgrantee, its agents or employees. The
Subgrantee aiso agrees to save harmless the Department from any and all expenses, including attorney fees, ail
court costs and awards for damages, incurred by the Department in litigation or otherwise resisting such claims or
liabilities as a result of any activities of the Subgrantee, its agents or employees.
Further, to the extent permitted by law, the Subgrantee, ff other than a State agency, agrees to protect, indemnify,
and save harmless the Department from and against ail claims, demands and muses of action of every kind and
character brought by any employee of the Subgrantee against the Department due to personal injuries and/or death
to such employee resulting from any aileged negligent act, by either commission or omission on the part of the
Subgrantee or the Department.
G2. Inspection of Work
The Department and, when federal funds are involved, the U. S. Department of Transportation, and any authorized
representative thereof, have the fight at all reasonable times to inspect or otherwise evaluate the work performed or
being performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed.
If any inspection or evaluation is made on the premises of the Subgrantee or a subcontractor, the Subgrantee shall
provide and require the subcontractor to provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of the inspectors in the performance of their duties. All inspections and evaluations shall be
performed in such a manner as will not unduly delay the work.
Disputes and Remedies
Thc Subgrantee shail be responsible for the settlement of ail contractual and administrative issues arising out of
procurement entered in support of agreement work.
Disputes concerning performance or payment shall be submitted to the Department for settlement with the
Executive Director acting ns referee.
This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any dispute or violation or breach of
agreement terms, but all remedies existing at law and in equity nmy be availed of by either party and shall be
cumulative.
G4. Noncollusion
The Subgrantee warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working for it, to solicit or secure this agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company
or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other
consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this agreement. If the Subgrantee
breaches or violates this warranty, the Department shall have the right to annul this ag~ement without liability or,
in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full mount of such
fee, commission, brokerage fee, glib, or contingent fee.
Page 5 oliO 1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
GS. RepoSing
Not later than ten days a~er the end of each reporting period, as designated in Attachment A, the Subgrantee shall
submit a performance report using forms provided or approved by the Department. The performance report will
include as a minimum (1) a comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives established for the period, (2)
reasons why established objectives ~vere not met, if appropriate, and (3) other pertinent information including,
when appropriate, analysis and explanation of cost overruns or high unit costs.
Tbe Subgrantee shall submit the final performance report within 10 days after completion of the grant.
The Subgramee shall promptly advise the Department in writing of events which have a significant impact upon
the agreement, including:
1. Problems, delays, or adverse conditions which will materially affect the ability to attain program objectives,
prevent the meeting of time schedules and objectives, or preclude the attainment of project work units by
established time periods. This disclosure shall be accompanied by a statement of the action taken or
contemplated and any Department or Federal assistance needed to resolve the situation.
2. Favorable developments or events that enable meeting time schedules and objectives sooner than anticipated
or producing more work units than originally projected.
G6. Records
The Subgrantee agrees to ~naintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence
pertaining to costs incurred and work performed hereunder, said books, documents, papers, accounting records,
and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and work performed hereinatler called the records, and shall make
such records available at its ofee at all rcasenablc times for the time period authorized in Article 1, Contract
Period. The Subgrantee further agrees to retain said records for four years from thc date of final payment of
contract costs incurred hereunder.
Duly authorized representatives of the Texas State Auditor, the Texas Department of Transportation, the United
States Department of Transportation, and the Office of the Inspector General shall have access to the records at
reasonable times during the period of the agreement and the four years retention period for the purpose of making
audits, excerpts, transcriptions, and other examinations. This right of access is not limited to the four year period
but shall last as long as the records are retained. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action
involving the records has been started before the expiration of the four year retention period, the subgrantea shall
retain the records until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise fxom it.
G7. Audit
The Subgrantee shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, Public Law (PL) 98-502,
ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in OMB Circular A-133, "Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Other Non-Profit Organizations."
G8. Subcontracts
Any subcontract rendered by individuals or organizations not a part of the Subgrantee's organization shall not be
executed without prior authorization and approval of the subcontract by the Department.
Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain all required provisions of this agreement. No subcontract will
relieve the Subgrantee of its responsibility under this agreement.
Page 6oflO
1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
G9. Termination
The Department may terminate this agreement at any time before the date of completion whenever it is determined
that the Subgruntee has failed to comply with the conditions of the agreement. The Department shall give written
notice to the Subgrantee at least seven days prior to the effective date of termination and specify the effective date
of termination and the reason for termination.
If both parties to this agreement agree that the continuation of the agreement would not produce beneficial
results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds, the parties shall agree upon the termination
conditions, including the effective date and the portion to be terminated.
Upon termination of this agreement, ~vhether for cause or at the convenience of the parties hereto, all finished or
unfinished documents, dam, studies, surveys, reports, maps, drawings, models, photographs, etc. prepared by the
Subgrantee shall, at the option of the Department, become the property of the Department.
The Department shall compensate the Subgruntee for those eligible expenses incurred during the ag~ement period
which are directly attributable to the completed portion of the work covered by this agreement, provided that the
~vork has been completed in a manner satisfactory and acceptable to the Department. The Subgrantee shall not
incur new obligations for the terminated portion atter the effective date of termination.
Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, the Subgrantee shall not be in default by mason of uny failure in
performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms (including any fallare by the Subgrantee to progress in
II~e performance of the work) ffsuch failure arises out of canses beyond the control and without the default or
negligence of the Subgrantee. Such causes may include but are not limited to acts of GOd or of the public enemy,
acts of the Government in either its sovereign or contractual capaci .ty, rims, floods, epidemics, quarantine
restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, and unusually severn ~veather. In ove~ case, however, the failure to
perform must be beyond the control and witlmut the fault or negligence oftbe Subgrantee.
Gl0. Gratuities
Texas Transportation Commission policy mundates that employees of the Department shall not accept any benefits,
gills or favors f~om uny person doing business with or who reasonably speaking may do business with the
Department under this agreement. The only exceptions allowed am ordinary bnsiness hinches und items that have
received the advanced written approval of the Department's Executive Director.
Any person doing business with or who reasonably speaking may do business with the Department under this
agreement may not make any offer of benefits, gills or favors to Department employees, except as mentioned
hemabove. Failure on the part of the Subgruntee to adhere to this policy may result in termination of this
agreement.
Gll. Compliunce With Laws
The Subgruntee shall comply with all Federal, State und local laws, statutes, ordinances, niles and regulations, and
the orders und decrees of any courts or administrative bodies or tribunals in uny matter affecting the performance
of this agreement, including, without limitation, workers' compensation laws, minimum and maximum sala~ und
wage statutes and regulations, and licensing laws und regulations. When required, the Subgrantce shall furnish the
Department with satisfactory proof of its compliunce therewith.
Gl2. Successors and Assigns
The Department and the Subgrantee each binds itself, its successors, executors, assigns and administrators to the
other party to this agreement and to the successors, executors, assigns und administrators of such other party in
respect to all covenants of this agreement. The Subgrantee shall not assign, sublet, or transfer interest nad
obligations in this agreement without written consent of the Department.
Page 7 of l O
1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
G13. Ownership of Documents
Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the Subgrantce or furnished to the
Subgrantee by the Department shall be delivered to and become the property of the Department. All sketches,
photographs, calculations, and other data prepared under this agreement shall be made available, upon request to
the Department without restriction or limitation of their farther use.
Gl4. Resources
The Subgrantee warrants that it presently has adequate qualified personnel in its employment to perform the work
required under this agreement, or will be able to obtain such personnel from sources other than the Department.
Unless otherwise specified, file Subgrantee shall furnish all equipment, materials, and supplies required to perform
the work authorized herein.
All employees of the Subgrantce shall have such knowledge and experience as will enable them to perform the
duties assigned to them. Any employee of the Subgrantee who, in the opinion of the Department, is incompetent,
or whose conduct becomes detrimental to the work, shall immediately be removed from association with the
project.
Gl5. Property Management
The Subgrantce shall establish and administer a ~stem to control, protect, prese~'e, use, maintain, and dispose of
any property furnished to it by the Department or purchased pursuant to this agreement in accordance with its own
property management procedures, provided that the procedures are not in conflict with the Department's properly
management procedures or property management standards, as appropriate, in:
· 49 CFR 18, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Govenmlents," or,
· OMB Circular A-110, "Uniform Requirements for Grants to Universities, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
Organizations."
Gl6. Procurement Standards
The Subgrantee shall maintain procurement standarda which meet or exceed the requirements, as appropriate, of:
· 49 CFR 18, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments," or,
· OMB Circular A-i 10, "Uniform Requirements for Grants to Universities, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
Organizations."
Gl7. Insurance
When directed by the Department, the Subgrantee, if other than a State agency, shall provide or shall require its
subcontractors to secure a policy of insurance in the maximum statutory limits for tort liability, naming the
Department as an additional insured under its terms. When so directed, the Subgrantee shall provide or shall
require its subcontractor to furnish proof of insurance on TxDOT Form 20.102 (12/91) to the Department, and
shall maintain the insurance during the grant period established in Article 1.
Gl8. Equal Employment Opportunity
The Subgrantce agrees to comply with Executive Order 11246 entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity" as
amended by Executive Order 11375 and as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR 60).
Page 8 of 10 1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
Gl9. Nondiscrimination
During the performance of this agreement, the Subgtantee, its assigns and successors in interest, agrees as follows:
1. Compllance with Regulations: The Subgrantee shall comply with the regulations relative to nondiscrimination
in federally assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Tire 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 21 and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 710.405(b), as they may be amended from time to lime
(hereinafter referred to as the Reguialions), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this
agreement~
2. Nondiscrimination: The Subgrantee, with regard to the work performed by it during the agreement, shall not
discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of sobeontracturs,
including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Subgrantee shall not participate either directly or
indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 and Part 710.405(1>) of the Regulations, including
employment practices when the agreement covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Reguialions.
3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations
either by compalitive bidding or negotiation made by the Subgrantee for work to be performed under a subcontract,
including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sobeontmctor or supplier shall be
notified by the Subgrantee of the Subgrantee's obligations under this agreement and the Regulations relative to
nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex, or nalional origin.
4. Information and Reports: The Subgrantcc shall provide all infonration and reports required by the
Regulations, or direclives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other
sources of information and its facilities as tray be determined by the Department or the U.S. Department of
Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations or directives. Where any information
required of the Subgrantee is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this infonration,
the Subgrantee shall so certify to the Department or the U.S. Department of Transportatian as appropriate, and
shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Subgrantee's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination
provisions of this agreement, the Department shall impose such sanctions ns it or the U.S. Department of
Transportation may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to:
· withholding of payments to the Subgrantee under the agreement unlil the Subgrantee cemplies, and/or
· cancellation, termination, or suspension of the agreement in whole or in part
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The Subgrantce shall include the provisions of paragraphs 1 through 5 in avery
subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
directives issued pursuant thereto. The Subgrantee slmll take such action with respect to any subcontract or
procurement ns the Department may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for
noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event a Subgrantee becomes involved in, or is threatened with
litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Subgrantee may request the Department
to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the Department; in addition, the Subgrantee may request the
United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
G20. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
It is the policy of the U.S. Department nf Transportatian that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises as defined in 49
CFR Part 26, shall have the opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part
with Federal funds. Consequently the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise requirements of 49 CFR Part 26, apply
to this agreement as follows:
* The Subgrantee agrees to insure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 26, have
the opportunity in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal
funds. In this regard, the Subgrantee shall make good faith efforts in accordance with 49 CFR Par 26, to
insure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises have the opportunity to compete for and perform contracts
and subeontracts.
· The Subgrantee and any subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or
gender in the award and performance of contracts funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.
These requirements shall be physically included in any subcontract.
Page 9 of lO 1/02
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
Failure to carry out the requirements set forth above shall constitute a breach of this agreement and, after the
notification of the Department, may result in termination of the agreement by the Department or other such remedy
as the Department deems appropriate.
G21. Debarment/Suspension
The Subgrantee is prohibited from making any award or permitting any award at any tier to any party ~vhich is
debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs
under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension.
The Subgrantee shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order awarded under this agreement to certify
its eligibility to receive federal grant funds, and, when requested by the Department, to fltmish a copy of the
certification.
G22. Signatory Warranty
The signatory for the Subgrantee hereby represents and warrants that she/he is an officer of the organization for
wifich she/he has executed this agreement and that she/he has full and complete authority to enter into this
agreement on behalf of the organization. At the tiree the signatory for the Subgrantee signs the grant agreement,
or within thirty days, he/she will sign a letter designating signature authority by position rifle for grant-related
documents other than the grant agreement or grant agreement amendments. These other grant-related documents
will include, but not be limited to, the following: cost assumption plan, application for project extension,
administrative evaluation report, requests for reimbursement (RFR), and routine correspondence.
G23. Assurances and Certification
The Subgrantee attests that the assurances included in Athachment C of this agreement and the certification
included in Attachment D of this agreement are accurate and current.
G24. Intellectual Property
Intellectual property consists of copyrights, patents, and any other form of intellectual property rights covering any
data bases, software, inventions, training manuals, systems design, or other proprietary information in any form or
medium.
Copyrights: TxDOT, the [other party to the contract], and the federal government reserve a royalty-free,
nonexclnsive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or othenvise use and to authorize others to use for
government purposes:
· the copyright in any works developed under tiffs agreement or under a subgrant or contract under this
agreement; and,
· any rights of copyright to which the [other party to the contract], its subgrantee, or contractor purchases
ownership of with financial assistance hereunder.
Patents: Rights to inventions made under this agreement shall be determined in accordance with 37 CFR 401. The
standard patent rights clause at 37 CFR §401.14 as modified below is hereby incorporated by reference:
· the terms "to be performed by a small business firm or domestic nonprofit organization" shall be deleted from
paragraph (g)(1) or the clause;
· Paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of the clause shall be deleted; and
· Paragraph (1) of the clause entitled "Communications," shall read as follows: "(1) Communications. All
notifications required by this clause shall be submitted to TxDOT."
If the grant results in the development of any intellectual property as defined in Transportation Code, Section
201.205, the Department and the Subgrantee shall jointly own all the rights, rifle, and interests in and to all data
and other information developed under the grant. Each agency may license, reproduce, publish, modify, or
otherwise use and authorize others to use the copyright in any work developed under this grant. All such
documents will contain a copyright mark acknowledging this joint ownership. There will not be a charge to either
agency for such use~
Page lO of lO 1/02
! r ' I!
ATTACHMENT A
APPROVED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2002 & 2003 Click It or Ticket STEP
(Selective Traffic Enforcement Project)
City of Corpus Christi
SUBGRANTEE
PROBLEM STATEMENT:
Texas is encountering many of the same obstacles in increasing the safety belt usage rates that
other states are experiencing. Since passage &the safety belt and child safety seat laws, the
most effective method in improving safety belt usage rates in Texas has been increased
enforcement at the state and local level. However, many Texas law enforcement agencies do
not have the resources (funding, staffing, and public information and education support) to
enhance their enforcement efforts to focus on occupant protection law violations. Some
federal traffic safety funding has been provided over the years to various agencies for occupant
protection enforcement and those programs have been extremely successful. In order to
increase usage rates in Texas, additional enforcement, along with a highly visible media
campaign, is the key.
Texas leads the nation in traffic fatalities. In 1999, 3,519 people were killed and 339,448 were
injured on Texas streets and highways. Many of these deaths could have been prevented if the
victims in these crashes would have been wearing safety belts. According to the National
Safety Council, people who wear safety belts have a 45% better chance of surviving a serious
traffic crash and a 50% better chance of surviving without severe injuries. The State of Texas
has had a Mandatory Use Law (MUL) for safety belts since 1985. Since that time, Texas has
seen safety belt use rise to among the highest levels in the country. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2001,
according to the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), Texas A&M University, the percent of
Texas from seat occupants restrained sthtewide was 76.1%.
Seasonal problems in Texas regarding safety belt use are evident. These trends can be
addressed by focusing on the safety belt issue(s) during peak holiday periods.
This project will increase safety belt rates through a CIOT STEP which include enhanced
enforcement and public information and education efforts.
OBJECTIVES/PERFORMANCE GOALS:
Objective:
To conduct CIOT STEP in Corpus Chris_ti during the Memorial Day and Thanksgiving Day
holidays by December 31, 2002.
Performance Goals:
A. To increase safety belt use among drivers and front seat passengers by:
10 percentage points for the Memorial Day CIOT STEP,
10 percentage points for the Thanksgiving ClOT STEP.
Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a
police officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the
Subgrantee's obligations hereunder.
IH. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS:
The following performance indicators shall be included in the Performance Reports, Annex
Reports, and summarized in the Administrative Evaluation:
A. Number and type of citations/arrests issued under STEP.
B. Subgrantee total number of OP citations including STEP.
C. Number of STEP enforcement hours worked.
D. Maintenance ofnon-CIOT STEP activity.
Number of officers working CIOT STEP trained in the Traffic Occupant Protection
Strategies (TOPS) course.
F. Number of presentations conducted in support of this grant.
G. Number of persons attending presentations.
H. Number of media exposures (i.e., news releases and interviews).
Number of community events in which CIOT STEP officers participated (i.e., health or
safety fairs, booths).
Number of public information and education materials distributed (by item) provided by
statewide media contractor.
IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SUBGRANTEE:
Carry out the objectives of this grant by implementing the Action Plan in this
attachment.
An Administrative Evaluation summarizing all activities and accomplishments
will be submitted on Department approved forms no later than 45 days after each fiscal
year.
C. Attend meetings according to the following:
The Subgrantee will arrange for meetings with the Department as indicated in
the Action Plan to present status of activities, discuss problems and schedule for
the following quarter's work.
The project coordinator or other qualified person will be available to represent
the Subgrantee at meetings requested by the Department.
For out of state travel expenses to be reimbursable, the Subgrantee must have obtained
the approval of the Department prior to the beginning of the trip. Grant approval does
not satisfy this requirement.
Maintain verification that wages or salaries for which reimbursement is requested is for
work exclusively related to this project.
In addition to the CIOT STEP enforcement activities, maintain the agency's total non-
STEP enforcement citations at no less than the level attained prior to grant approval.
Ensure that the enforcement hours worked under the grant are for CIOT STEP
activities.
Ensure that each officer working on the CIOT STEP project will complete an officer's
daily report form. At a minimum, the form should include: name, date, badge number,
type grant worked, grant site number, mileage (including starting and ending mileage),
hours worked, type citation/arrest, officer and supervisor signatures.
Ensure that no officer above the rank of Lieutenant (or equivalent title) will be
reimbursed for enforcement duty.
Support grant enforcement efforts with public information and education in
coordination with statewide efforts. Enforcement salaries being claimed for PI&E
activities must be included in the budget.
Officers assigned to OP sites should be trained in the Traffic Occupant Protection
Strategies (TOPS) course approved by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement
Officer Standards and Education (TCLEOSE).
Subgrantees with a Traffic Division will utilize traffic personnel for this grant unless
such personnel are unavailable for assignment.
Ensure that salaries for employees reimbursed under this grant are either overtime pay
or additional hires. In no case will federal funds supplant (i.e., replace existing state or
local expenditures with the use of federal grant funds) Subgrantee wages for activities
which are already supported by local or state funds.
Submit performance and annex reports to the Department by June 12, 2002 for the
Memorial Day enforcement effort and by December 11, 2002 for the Thanksgiving
enforcement effort.
O. The Subgrantee should have a safety belt use policy. If the Subgrantee does not have a
safety belt use policy in place, a policy should be implemented during the grant year.
Submit an enforcement plan to the Department two weeks prior to each enforcement
period.
, V. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT:
Monitor the Subgrantee's compliance with performance obligations and fiscal
requirements of this grant.
B. Provide program management, technical assistance, and attend meetings as appropriate.
Reimburse the Subgrantee for all eligible costs as defined in Attachment B,
Approved Project Budget. Requests for Reimbursement will be processed up to the
maximum amount payable as indicated on the cover page of this agreement.
Perform an administrative evaluation of the project at the close of the grant
period to include a review of adherence to budget, Action Plan and attainment of
objective/performance goals.
If an officer makes a CIOT STEP-related arrest during the shift, but does not complete
the arrest before the shift is scheduled to end, the officer can continue working under
the grant to complete that arrest.
VI. OPERATIONAL PLAN:
FY 2002 & 2003 ClOT STEP
SITE DESCRIPTION Enforcement Period
Memorial Day
Occupant Protection May 20-June 2
Jurisdiction wide
(Daylight hours) Thanksgiving Day
Nov. 25-Dec. 1
Pre-Media Campaign
America Week
May June
Post-Media
Campaign
Pre-Media Campaign
Thanksgiving
November December
Post-Media Campaign
Description of Activities
Media Campaign
Conduct local media events immediately before the enforcement effort to maximize the visibility of enforcement
to the public. These media events tell the public when, where, how and why the safety belt laws are being
enforced.
Enforcement Blitz
Intensify enforcement through an overtime STEP which places primmy emphasis on increasing the number of
citations for non-use of occupant restraints during the Memorial Day and Thanksgiving holidays.
Post-media Campaign
Conduct local media events to tell the public why the safety belt laws are important and the results of the CIOT
STEP.
FY 2002 & 2003 ACTION PLAN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a CIOT STEP in Corvus Christi by December 31, 2002.
Administrative and general grant requirements.
KEY: P = planned activity
C = completed activity
R = revised
CIOT STEP.7/01
PROJECT MONTH
ACTIVITY
RESPONSBLE
MR
AP
MY
JN
JY
AU
SE
OC
NO
DE
JA
FE
P
1. Grant delivery meeting held.
Department
P
P
P
2. Requests for Reimbursement submitted.
Subgrantee
P
P
P
3. Performance and An=cReports submitted
Subgrantee
P
P
4. Grant progress review meeting.
Subgrantee &
Department
P
P
5. Monitoring grant activities.
Department
P
P
6. Administrative Evaluation submitted for each
Subgrantee
FY.
P
7. Submit letter regarding signature authority.
Subgrantee
8. Attend Buckle Up Texas Summit.
Subgrantee
P
P
9. Submit operational cost per vehicle mile (if
Subgrantee
applicable).
10. Submit enforcement plan to the Department
Subgrantee
P
P
two weeks rior to each enforcement enod.
P
P
P
11. Conduct concentrated occupant protection
SubgranteeP
enforcement.
CIOT STEP.7/01
FY2002 & 2003 ACTION PLAN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a CIOT STEP in Corpus Christi9 by December 31, 2002.
Public information and education (PI & E) activities requirements.
KEY: P = planned activity
C = completed activity
R = revised
CIOT STEP.7/01
PROJECT MONTH
ACTIVITY
RESPONSIBLE
MR
AP
MY
JN
JL
AU
SE
OC
NO
DE
JA
-
1. Contact the Department regarding PI&E
Subgrantee
P
procedures and planning to coordinate with
statewide efforts.
A
2. Distribute materials provided by Department's
Subgrantee
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P;
statewide media contractor.
3. Maintain records of all PI&E materials
Subgrantee
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
received/distributed.
4. Report on activities in Performance Report.
Subgrantee
P
P
n`
'
5. Conduct news conference(s).
Subgrantee
P
P
P
P
6. Issue news release(s).
Subgrantee
P
P
P
P
7. Conduct presentations.
Subgrantee
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
8. Participate in community events (i.e.,
Subgrantee
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
health or safety fairs, booths).
CIOT STEP.7/01
PROJECT BUDGET
ClOT STEP
(Title of Project)
City of Corpus Christi
(Name of Subgrantee)
ATTACHMENT B
BUDGET CATEGORY I - LABOR COSTS
(100) Salaries
Hourly wage rates are estimated for budget purposes
only. Reimbursements will be based on actual
costs per employee in accordance with Sub~
grantee's payroll polic,, and salary rates.
A. ENFORCEMENT (overtime)
1. Officers:
1344hours (~ $34 perhour= $45,696
2. Sergeants:
0 hours ~ $0 per hour= $0
3. Lieutenants:
0 hours @ $0 per hour= $0
B. OTHER
(i.e., administrative overtime staff, supervisory support:
not to exceed 10% of total grant amount)
Type:
45 hours (~ $34 per hour = $1,530
TOTAL SALARIES
(200) Fdn.qe Benefits
A. Rate: % (if not included in hourly rate
B. Other salaries:
19.16%
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS
(300) Travel and Per Diem Buckle Up Summit
Mileage (documentation of rate is required
prior to reimbursement), airfare, car rental,
per diem, etc. Reimbursements will be based
in accordance with Subgrantee's travel policy
not to exceed state rates.
(Round figumsto neamst $)
Federal
Funds
$45,696
$o
$o
$1,530
$47,226
$9,049
$o
$9,049
$0
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
$56,275
ClOTSTEP 01/02
Page 1 of 2
PROJECT BUDGET
ClOT STEP
(Title of Project)
City of Corpus Christi
(Name of Subgrantee)
ATTACHMENT B
(CONTINUED)
BUDGET CATEGORY II - OTHER DIRECT COSTS:
(Round figumsto nearest $)
Federal
Funds
(700) Other Miscellaneous (specify)
A. SUBGRANTEE VEHICLE MILEAGE
Rates used only for budget estimate. Reimbursement will be
made according to the approved Subgrantee's average cost per
mile to operate patrol vehicles, not to exceed the state rate ($.345).
Documentation of cost per mile is required pdor to reimbursement.
2688 miles at $0.35 per mile = $927
$927
TOTAL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
SUMMARY:
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
BUDGET NARRATIVE:
$927
$927
$56,275
$927
GRAND TOTAL $57,202
[include in narrative form any needed explanations as to
specifics on travel (where to, what for, etc.).]
CIOTSTEP 01/02
Page 2 of 2
F~ ~s~4 Attachment C
STANDARD ASSURANCES
The Subgrantee hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines,
and requirements, including 49 CFR 18 and OMB Circular A-87, or OMB Circulars A-110 and A-21, or
OMB Circulars A- 110 and A- 122, as they relate to the application, acceptance, and use of federal or state
funds for this project. Also, the Subgrantee assures and certifies to the grant that:
It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, motion, or similar action has been
duly adopted or passed as an official act to the applicant's governing body, authorizing the filing of the
application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and
authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with
the application and to provide such additional information as may be required.
It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and in accordance
with Title VI of that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national
origin be excluded from participation in, be denied benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives federal financial
assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.
It will comply with Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d) prohibiting employment
discrimination where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to provide employment or (2) discriminatory
employment practices will result in unequal trealanent of persons who are or should be benefiting from
the grant-sided activity.
It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (PL 91,646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of
persons displaced as a result of federal and federally assisted programs.
5. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees.
It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor
Standards Act, as they apply to hospital and educational institution employees of State and loea!
governments.
It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or
gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others,
particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties.
8. It will give the sponsorkng agency the access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or
documents related to the grant.
9. It xvill comply with all requirements imposed by the sponsoring agency concerning special requirements
of law, program requirements, and other adnfinistrative requiremems.
Page 1 of 2
Star~ard Assurances Attachment C continued
10. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease, supervision which shall be utilized in the
accomplishment of the project are not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of
Violating Facilities and that it will notify the federal grantor agency of the receipt of any
communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to be
used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EPA.
l 1. It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, PL 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December 3 l, 1976. Section 102(a)
requires, on and ai'ter March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where such
insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of any federal financial assistance for construction
or acquisition purposes for use in any area that has been identified by the Secretary of the Department
of Housing and Urban Development as an area having special flood hazards. The phrase "federal
financial assistance" includes any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy,
disaster assistance loan or grant, or any form of direct or indirect federal assistance
12. It will assist the grantor agency in its compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 USC 470), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological
and Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 469a-1 et seq,) by (a) consulting with the State
Historic Preservation Officer to conduct the investigation, as necessary, to identify properties listed in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places that are subject to adverse effects
(see 36 CFR 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the federal grantor agency of the existence of any
such properties, and by (b) complying with all requirements established by the federal grantor agency
to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such properties.
13. It will comply with Chapter 573 of the Texas Government Code by insuring that no officer, employee,
or member of the applicant's governing body of the applicants grant shall vote or confirm the
employment of any person related with in the second degree of affinity or third degree by consanguinity
to any member of the governing body or to any other officer employee authorized to employ or
supervise such person. This prohibition shall not prohibit the employment of a person described in
Section 573.062 of the Texas Government Code.
It will insure that all information collected; assembled, or maintained by the applicant relative to
this project shall be available to the public during normal business hours hi compliance with Chapter
552 of the Texas Government Code, unless otherwise expressly provided by law.
It will comply with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, which requires all regular, special,
or called meetings of governmental bodies to be open to the public, except as otherwise provided by law
or specifically permitted in the Texas Constitution.
Page 2 0£2
DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION
AT'rACHMENT D
(1) The SUBGRANTEE certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or
voluntarily excluded from covenxl transactions by any federal department or agency.
Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil
judgement rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offenses in
connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a federal, state, or local
public transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or slate antitrust
statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property.
(c)
Axe not presently indicted for otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a federal, state, or
local governmental entity with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph
(l)Co) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more
federal, state, or local public transactions terminated for cause or default.
(2) Where the SUBGRANTEE is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such
SUBGRANTEE shall attach an explanation to this certification.
,// ST'gnatu ofcertifcng Omci
David R. Gareia, City Manager '
Title
3-7-
Date
Page 1 ofl
LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
for
Grants, Contracts, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements
ATTACHMENT E
The undemigned certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1)
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any federal contrach the making of any federal grant, the making of
any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2)
If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit
Standard Form - LL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions.
(3)
The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawurds at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subreeeipients shall certify disclosure
accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when its mmscation
~vns made or entered into. Submission of this eenitication is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who falls to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for
each such failure.
David P,_ Garcia, City Manager
Title
CRv of Comus Christi
Agency
Date
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $57,202 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND
FOR FUNDING OF THE CLICK IT OR TICKET (CIOT)
SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROJECT (STEP) WITHIN THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That $57,202 is appropriated from the Texas Department of Transportation in the No.
1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for funding of the Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Selective Traffic
Enforcement Project (STEP) within the Police Department in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants
Fund.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached,
the City Council (1) fmds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action
necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter
nde that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this
ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the
day of ,2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
APPROVED ~ ~
James R. Bray, Jr. ~
City Attorney
,2002
By:
Lisa Aguilar
Assistant City Attorney
23
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Proposed Adjustments to the Current City of Corpus Christi Single
Member District Lines
DATE: April 12, 2002
In 1983, the Corpus Christi City Council approved the 5-3-1 Single Member District Plan
in effect today. Due to major population shifts reported in the 1990 Census, the plan was
reevaluated and the district lines were redrawn. The Corpus Christi City Charter requires
the population among districts to be equalized. Because of the 2000 Census data and City
Charter requirements, a new plan must be recommended by the City Council for submittal
to the United States Department of Justice for subsequent approval. Therefore, attached
for your consideration are proposed adjustments to the current single member district lines
that I am recommending.
Various factors or guidelines were considered and incorporated into the adjusted single
member district plan. These factors included the "ten percent rule", areas of population
growth and decline, and modifications to each district to reflect a similar minority
percentage as approved in the 1983 plan.
Since the Justice Department requires the City to demonstrate solicitation of public
response to the Redistricting Plan, two public hearings were planned during the month of
April. A public hearing was held on April 11, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
The second public hearing is being held today during the regularly scheduled city council
meeting. Publication of the public hearings were posted in the newspaper. In addition, the
"government channel" and the City website were utilized for informing the public. Large
maps were also displayed in City Hall with informational packets available in the City
Secretary's Office and public libraries.
In addition, packets of public information were sent to specific special interest groups.
These included the following: LULAC, League of Women Voters, NAACP, MALDEF,
Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce, Black Chamber
of Commerce, Neighborhood and Business Associations as well as the Plaintiffs in the
original single member district lawsuit filed against the City.
Following approval of the plan, a submission to the U.S. Department of Justice will occur
shortly thereafter. A response from the Department of Justice requesting additional
information, approving or denying the plan would following in approximately 60 days. A
contingency of several months has been built into the plan if additional information is
requested or denial occurs.
Arm~n~lo Chapa
City Secretary
A Redistricting Plan
March, 2002
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
INTRODUCTION
"Public Law (PL 94-171), enacted in 1975, directs the U.S. Census Bureau to
make special preparations to provide redistricting data needed by the 50 states.
It specifies that within a year following Census Day (by April 1, 2000); the Census
Bureau must send the governor and legislature in each state the data they need
to redraw districts for the United States Congress and state legislature. The
objective of the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program was to produce the
data that the Census Bureau provides to states to meet the requirements of PL
94-171."
Public Law 94-171 data are statistical summaries containing population totals by
race, Hispanic or Latino and voting age for all appropriate geographic areas.
The most prominent being the voting tabulation districts.
The City of Corpus Chdsti has taken the initiative to use Census 2000, PL 94-171
data to parallel State actions and carry out the necessary steps to re-apportion its
own population as part of the redistricting process. The City has utilized 2000
data and devised a new plan to replace existing Single Member Distdct Plan,
which was first developed in 1983, updated in 1990 and revised in 1994.
The new plan will be based on the City of Corpus Christi's current electoral
system, which was established by Ordinance 17495, February 2, 1983. The
system consists of eight (8) City Council members and a mayor. Five (5) of the
City Council members shall be elected by majority vote from Single Member
Districts, three (3) elected at large by plurality vote, with winners required to gain
at least twelve pement (12%) of the total votes cast for ail at-large council
member positions; and the mayor elected at large by a majority vote.
Significant population movement within the city has created noticeable variations
in the population distribution in the City's current Single Member District Electoral
System. During the inception of the current electoral system and again in the
1990's, the City of Corpus Christi made every effort to allow sufficient population
differential.
However, as is the case with the City of Corpus Christi along with a majodty of
municipalities, population growth and mobility within its boundaries has created
enough deviation, warranting modifications to its current system. It is the intent
of the City of Corpus Christi to adhere to the parameters as dictated by district
court decision, which would allow for two "safe" and one "swing" districts. The
two "safe" districts to have a majority Hispanic population to ensure the chances
of Hispanic candidates being voted into office.
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
03/19/02
CORPUS CHRISTI POPULATION
Since being established in the 1850's, the City of Corpus Christi has always
experienced and maintained a positive growth trend through the 2000 Census.
Based on prior Census records, it was dudng the 1920's and 1930% that Corpus
Christi's population more than doubled. Since those two decades the City's
population continued to grow exponentially until the growth trend plateau was
reached in the 1960's.
1960 1960 1970 19~0 1990 2000
Concurrently the City's population increases over the last four decades have not
been as intense, but instead have shown an increasing population with a
declining rate of growth. Table 1 shows the City's population growth over the last
five decades.
TABLE 1
CENSUS POPULATION CHANGE %CHANGE
1950 108,287 .......
1960 167,690 59,403 54.9%
1970 204,525 36,835 22.0%
1980 231,999 27,474 13.4%
1990 257,453 25,454 11.0%
2000 277,454 20,001 7.8%
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
03/19/02
CORPUS CHRISTI'S POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANICS
The Hispanic population in the City of Corpus Christi is continuing to grow at a
faster rate than the city as a whole. In 1960 the Hispanic population accounted
for 59,859 or 35.6% of the total population, while White Non-Hispanic population
made up 98,504 or 58.7% of the population. Four decades later the numbers
appear reversed. Based on the 2000 Census, Hispanics accounted for 150,737
or 54.3% of the population, compared to 106,901 or 38.5% for the White Non-
Hispanic population.
HISPANIC AND WHITE NH POPULATION - CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
960
1970 1980 1990 2000
HISPANICS -.-- WHITE-NH~
Since 1960 the majority of the City's overall growth has been attributed
predominantly to the increases of the Hispanic population. White Non-Hispanics,
however show continued decline for the same periods. Table 2 shows a
comparison from 1990 to 2000 of each Single Member District's total population,
Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic population. Hispanics, as a percent of the total
Single Member Districts population, increased in all five districts, while the White
Non-Hispanic population declined in all five.
1990
Census
TABLE 2
Percent of Hispanics & White Non-Hiso. By District
Ci_ty of Corpus Christi
2000 %Hisp %Hisp %WNH %WNH
Census 1990 2000 1990 2000
SMD 1
SMD 2
SMD 3
SMD 4
SMD 5
53,722
53,016
52,106
49,653
48,931
54,668 55.0% 59.6% 36.1% 33.0%
52,777 67.8% 73.0% 29.3% 23.2%
52,402 67.4% 73.3% 25.0% 18.5%
55,019 21.5% 26.0% 73.9% 66.4%
62,584 37.7% 43.1% 57.5% 48.6%
3
2000 Census PL94-171
2002Redistricting Plan
03/19/02
EXISTING SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT POPULATION DIFFERENTIAL
Only Single Member District 2 lost population from 1990 to 2000. Single Member
Districts #1 and #3 had gains of less than 1000, which accounted for less than
2% gain. Districts #4 and #5 had the two highest population gains. Table 3
shows the population change within each Single Member District from 1990 to
2000. Single Member District #5 had significant population increase compared to
the remaining four districts.
TABLE 3
Population Change By Single Member District
Ci_ty of Corpus Christi
1990 2000 90-2000 90-2000
Census Census Change Change
Sin'Mem. Dist. 1 53,722 54,668 946 1.8%
Sin. Mem. Dist. 2 53,016 52,777 -239 -0.5%
Sin. Mem. Dist. 3 52,106 52,402 296 0.6%
Sin. Mem. Dist. 4 49,653 55,019 5,366 10.8%
Sin. Mem. Dist. 5 48,931 62,584 13,653 27.9%
The Figure below shows the percent gain or loss as a percent of the total amount
gained by the City as a whole. Out of the total City growth, close to 70% went to
Single Member District #5.
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0~
20.0 Yo
10.0%
0.0%
-10.0%
Population Gain/Decline As %Of Total
SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD
#1 fY2 #3 f~t #5
The following six spreadsheets/charts provide an analysis of the single member
districts in the City. In addition, a summary of the recommended redistricting
plan with an attached map is provided. A listing of all Voting Precincts within
each of the new Single Member Districts of the recommended plan is included.
4
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
03 / 19/02
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT PROFILES
1990 CENSUS & 2000 CENSUS
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
3/19/02
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANICS
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. THE RATE OF GROWTH OF HISPANICS WAS MORE THAN TWICE THAT OF THE
CITY'S AS A WHOLE. HISPANIC POPULATION INCREASED IN ALL FIVE DISTRICTS.
2. THE POPULATION GAIN OF HISPANICS ACCOUNTED
FOR MORE THAN THE TOTAL CITY POPULATION GAIN.
3. THE WHITE NON -HISPANIC POPULATION DECLINED BY CLOSE TO
6,000, OR 5.2% BETWEEN 1990 AND 2000.
4. THERE WAS A DECLINE IN THE WHITE NON -HISPANIC POPULATION
IN ALL FIVE DISTRICTS EXCEPT DISTRICT p5.
SOURCE: 1MANO1X0CENSUS
"Other Comprleed of Am. Indian 6 Alaska Nal., Aslan, Nat Wmalan d
OthR Pacific Islander and Some Other Race.
EthnicDist60-02X.x1s
POPULAT*N
AU
IM-
r--. - -.
1990
1990
%
2000
%
CHANGE
%CWNW
HISPANIC
129,701
50.4%
150,737
54.3%
21,036
16.2%
WHITENHISP
112,803
43.8%
106,897
38.5%
-5,906
-5.2%
BLACK NHISP
11,655
4.5%
12,404
4.5%
749
6.4%
OTHERNHISP'
3,269
1.3%
4,625
1.7%
1,356
41.5%
TWO RACES+
0
0.0%
2,787
1.0%
2,787
NA
TOTAL
257,428
100.0%
277,450
100.0%
20,022
7.8%
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANICS
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. THE RATE OF GROWTH OF HISPANICS WAS MORE THAN TWICE THAT OF THE
CITY'S AS A WHOLE. HISPANIC POPULATION INCREASED IN ALL FIVE DISTRICTS.
2. THE POPULATION GAIN OF HISPANICS ACCOUNTED
FOR MORE THAN THE TOTAL CITY POPULATION GAIN.
3. THE WHITE NON -HISPANIC POPULATION DECLINED BY CLOSE TO
6,000, OR 5.2% BETWEEN 1990 AND 2000.
4. THERE WAS A DECLINE IN THE WHITE NON -HISPANIC POPULATION
IN ALL FIVE DISTRICTS EXCEPT DISTRICT p5.
SOURCE: 1MANO1X0CENSUS
"Other Comprleed of Am. Indian 6 Alaska Nal., Aslan, Nat Wmalan d
OthR Pacific Islander and Some Other Race.
EthnicDist60-02X.x1s
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 1
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. LOWEST GAIN IN TOTAL POPULATION, LESS THAN 2%
2. ONLY DISTRICT TO HAVE A NEGATIVE DECLINE IN
BOTH HISPANIC AND BLACK POPULATION
3. HIGHEST OUT -MIGRATION PERCENT OF BLACK POPULATION.
4. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 4.6%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 3.1%.
SOURCE. 19W AND ZWp CENSUS
"Other Comprised of Am. Indian 4 Alaska Nat, Aslan, Nat HiraAw 8
Other Paclflc Islander and Some Other Race.
S 1990
02000 i
CFM OK T7QAFF4lS
r--. - -.
1990
%
200 0 %
CHANGE
%CHANGE
HISPANIC
29,522
55.0%
32,561 59.6%
3,0391
10.3%
WHITE NHISP
19,376
36.1%
18,030 33.0e/a
-1,346
-6.9%
BLACK NHISP
4,393
8.2%
31247 5.9%
-1,146
-26.1%
OTHER NHISP'
431
0.8%
438 0.8%
7F-1
6%
TWO RACES+
0
0.0%
392 0.7%
392
NA
TOTAL
53,722
100.0%
54,668 100.0%
946
1.8%
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 1
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. LOWEST GAIN IN TOTAL POPULATION, LESS THAN 2%
2. ONLY DISTRICT TO HAVE A NEGATIVE DECLINE IN
BOTH HISPANIC AND BLACK POPULATION
3. HIGHEST OUT -MIGRATION PERCENT OF BLACK POPULATION.
4. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 4.6%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 3.1%.
SOURCE. 19W AND ZWp CENSUS
"Other Comprised of Am. Indian 4 Alaska Nat, Aslan, Nat HiraAw 8
Other Paclflc Islander and Some Other Race.
S 1990
02000 i
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
3/19/02
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 2
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. THERE WAS A DECLINE OF TOTAL POPULATION FROM 1990 TO 2000
2. THIS DISTRICT HAD THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF OUT -MIGRATION OF
WHITE NON -HISPANIC POPULATION.
3. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 5.2%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 6.1%.
SOURCE: 1290 AND 2000 CENSUS
Other Comprised of Am. Indian 6 Alaska N.L. Aslan, NO. Has aian 8
Other Pacific Islander and Some Olhw Rau,
®1990
02000
POPULATION CHANGE BY PACE 1990-2000
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
SiMCLE,MEAV"4 DUCT #2:
1990
% 2000 %
CHANGE
%CHANGE
HISPANIC
35,948
67.8% 38,517 73.0%
2,569
7.1%
WHITE NHISP
15,558
29.3% 12,269 23.2%
-3,289
-21.1%
BLACK NHISP
11128
2.1% 1,248 2.4%
120
10.6%
OTHER NHISP'
382
0.7% 370 0.7%
-13-3.1%
TOTAL
TWO RACES-
0
0.0% 373 0.7%
373
NA
TOTAL
53,016
100.0% 52,777 100.0%
-239
_0S%
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 2
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. THERE WAS A DECLINE OF TOTAL POPULATION FROM 1990 TO 2000
2. THIS DISTRICT HAD THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF OUT -MIGRATION OF
WHITE NON -HISPANIC POPULATION.
3. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 5.2%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 6.1%.
SOURCE: 1290 AND 2000 CENSUS
Other Comprised of Am. Indian 6 Alaska N.L. Aslan, NO. Has aian 8
Other Pacific Islander and Some Olhw Rau,
®1990
02000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 3
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. ABOUT 1% IN POPULATION GAIN FROM 1990 TO 2000
2. THIS DISTRICT HAD SECOND HIGHEST NUMBER OF WHITE NON -HISPANIC
OUT -MIGRATION, BUT HIGHEST PERCENT.
3. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 5.9%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 6.5%.
SOURCE. 1920 AND 5020 CENSUS
^ Othx Comprised of Am. Indian 8 Alaska Nat., Asian, Nat Hamadan 8
Other Pacific Islander and Some Other Rau,
e 1990
10 2000
EthnicDist60-02X.xis 2
POPULATION CHANGE BY RACE 19W - 2000
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
1990 % 2000 %
CHANGE
%CHANGE
HISPANIC
35,123 67.41 38,386 73.3%
3.263
9.3%
WHITE NHISP
13,0 25.0% 9,689 18.5%
-3,345
-25.7%
BLACK NHISP
3,502 6.7% 3,576 6.8%
74
2.1 %
OTHER NHISP'
447 0.9% 441 0.8%
-6
-1.3%
TWO RACES,
0 0.0% 310 0.6%
310
NA
TOTAL
52,106 100.4% 52,402 100.0%
296
0.6%
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 3
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. ABOUT 1% IN POPULATION GAIN FROM 1990 TO 2000
2. THIS DISTRICT HAD SECOND HIGHEST NUMBER OF WHITE NON -HISPANIC
OUT -MIGRATION, BUT HIGHEST PERCENT.
3. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 5.9%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 6.5%.
SOURCE. 1920 AND 5020 CENSUS
^ Othx Comprised of Am. Indian 8 Alaska Nat., Asian, Nat Hamadan 8
Other Pacific Islander and Some Other Rau,
e 1990
10 2000
EthnicDist60-02X.xis 2
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
3/19102
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 4
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. DISTRICT 4 HAD SECOND HIGHEST PERCENT INCREASE
IN TOTAL POPULATION - 10.8%
2. SECOND HIGHEST INCREASE IN NUMBER AND PERCENT
OF HISPANIC POPULATION
3. ALL POPULATION GROUPS GAINED POPULATION
EXCEPT WHITE NON -HISPANICS
4. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 4.5%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 7.5%.
SOURCE. IM AND 2000 CENSUS
Mw Com~ o1 Am. Indlan 6 Als Nat, Aslan, NK Ha . 8
M. Pale. W.", Som. Mu Rac..
e 1sso
O 2000
POPULATION
CHANGE BY RACE 9We 2000
CtWOFCORPUSCHRIST! w
'
1990
1990
%
2000
% CHANGE
%CHANGE
HISPANIC
10,660
21.5%
14,326
26.0%
3,666
34.4%
WHITE NHISP
36,676
73.9%
36,506
66.4%
-170
-0.5%
BLACK NHISP
1,204
2.4%
1,785
3.2%
581
48.3%
OTHER NHISP'
1,113
2.2%
1,465
2.7%
352
31.6%
TWO RACES+
0
0.0%
937
1.7%
937
NA
TOTAL
49,653
100.0%
55,019
100.0%
5,366
10.8%
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 4
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. DISTRICT 4 HAD SECOND HIGHEST PERCENT INCREASE
IN TOTAL POPULATION - 10.8%
2. SECOND HIGHEST INCREASE IN NUMBER AND PERCENT
OF HISPANIC POPULATION
3. ALL POPULATION GROUPS GAINED POPULATION
EXCEPT WHITE NON -HISPANICS
4. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 4.5%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 7.5%.
SOURCE. IM AND 2000 CENSUS
Mw Com~ o1 Am. Indlan 6 Als Nat, Aslan, NK Ha . 8
M. Pale. W.", Som. Mu Rac..
e 1sso
O 2000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 5
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. DISTRICT 5 HAD HIGHEST PERCENT INCREASE
IN TOTAL POPULATION - 27.9%
2. HIGHEST INCREASE IN NUMBER AND PERCENT
OF HISPANIC AND BLACK POPULATION
3. THE POPULATION GAIN OF HISPANICS WAS ALMOST
FOUR TIMES THAT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS
4. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 5.4%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 8.9%.
SOURCE. IMAND 2000 CENSUS
M. CemP,I M & Am. 1.0w 6 Aleka Nat, Alan, NK H.Aw 8
OMe Pnifle Islands and Som. 00. Rap.
1e 1990
020001
EthnicDist6G-02X.xls 3
POPULATION CHANGE BY RACE 1990- 2000
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
&1Mf',,1' moi;
1990
%
2000
%
CHANGE
%CHANGE
HISPANIC
18,448
37.7%
26,947
43.1%
8,499
46.1%
WHITE NHISP
28,15
57.5%
30,403
48.6%
2,244
8.0%
BLACK NHISP
1,428
2.9%
2.548
4.1%
1,120
78.4%
OTHER NHISP'
896
1.8%
1,9111
3.1%
1,015
113.3%
TWO RACES,
0
0.0%
7751
1.2%
775
NA
TOTAL
48,931
100.0%
62,584
100.0%
13,653
27.9%
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 5
HISPANIC WHITE BLACK OTHER TWO
NHISP NHISP NHISP RACES+
1. DISTRICT 5 HAD HIGHEST PERCENT INCREASE
IN TOTAL POPULATION - 27.9%
2. HIGHEST INCREASE IN NUMBER AND PERCENT
OF HISPANIC AND BLACK POPULATION
3. THE POPULATION GAIN OF HISPANICS WAS ALMOST
FOUR TIMES THAT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS
4. THE PERCENT OF HISPANICS IN THE DISTRICT INCREASED 5.4%,
WHILE THE PERCENT OF WHITE NON -HISPANICS DECREASED BY 8.9%.
SOURCE. IMAND 2000 CENSUS
M. CemP,I M & Am. 1.0w 6 Aleka Nat, Alan, NK H.Aw 8
OMe Pnifle Islands and Som. 00. Rap.
1e 1990
020001
EthnicDist6G-02X.xls 3
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
03/19/02
2002 REDISTRICTING RECOMMENDED PLAN
6
2000CensusPL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
3/19102
64,000 -
62,000
60,000
58,000
56,000
54,000
52,000
50,000
48,000
46,000
POPULATION ADJUSTMENT BY DISTRICT
SMD1 SMD2 SMD3 SMD4 SMD5
•AFTER OB OFE RE
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
-500
1
-1,000
-1,500 --
-2,000
AMOUNT OF DEVIATION BY DISTRICT
1
SOURCE: 1990 AND 2000 CENSUS
"Other Comprised of Am. Indian 8 Alaska Nat., Asian, Nat. Hawalan 8 Other Pacific Islander, Some Other Race and Population of Two or More Races.
2000SMDOptionl.xls
-1,646
J
I]
k+
2002 REDISTRICTING PLAN
RECOMMENDED PLAN
SIN. MEM,
DISTRICT
VOTING
PRECINCTS
TOTAL
POPULATION
OFA Y RACE
HISPANICS %
WHITE
%
NON -HISPANIC
BLK/AFAM
% OTHER" %
DEVIATION
AMOUNT %
SMD 1
All
54,668
32,561
59.6%
18,030
33.0%
3,247
5.9% 830 1.5%
-822
-1.48%
SMD 2
All
57,379
41,193
71.8%
14,001
24.4%
1,342
2.3% 843 1.5%
1,889
3.40%
SMD 3
All
56,540
41,163
72.8%
10,747
19.0%
3,798
6.7% 832 1.5%
1,050
1.89%
SMD4
All
55,019
14,326
26.0%
36,506
66.4%
1,785
3.2% 2,402 4.4%
-471
-0.85%
SMD 5
All
53,844
21,494
39.9%
27,613
51.3%
2,232
4.1% 2,505 4.7%
-1,646
-2.97%
AVERAGE
55,490
CITY
Total
277,450
150,737
54.3%
106,897
38.5°h
12,4041
4.5% 7,412
64,000 -
62,000
60,000
58,000
56,000
54,000
52,000
50,000
48,000
46,000
POPULATION ADJUSTMENT BY DISTRICT
SMD1 SMD2 SMD3 SMD4 SMD5
•AFTER OB OFE RE
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
-500
1
-1,000
-1,500 --
-2,000
AMOUNT OF DEVIATION BY DISTRICT
1
SOURCE: 1990 AND 2000 CENSUS
"Other Comprised of Am. Indian 8 Alaska Nat., Asian, Nat. Hawalan 8 Other Pacific Islander, Some Other Race and Population of Two or More Races.
2000SMDOptionl.xls
-1,646
J
I]
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
03/19/02
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT PLAN MAP
RECOMMENDED PLAN
7
SINGLE MEMBER REDISTRICTING - RECOMMENDED PLAN
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DIST.
CHANGES MADE TO EXISTING SYSTEM
1
= NO CHANGES MADE TO THIS DISTRICT
2
= ADD VOTING PRECINCTS 48, 84, & 109
3
- ADD VOTING PRECINCTS 70, & 89
BLACK
REMOVE VOTING PRECINCTS 48.
4
- NO CHANGES MADE TO THIS DISTRICT
5
= REMOVE VOTING PRECINCTS 70, 84, 89, & 109.
RECOMMENDED PLAN MAKEUP
DIST
POP.
DEV.
%
HISP
%
WHITE
%
BLACK
%
1
54,668
-822
-1.48%
32,561
59.6%
18,030
33.0%
31247
5.9%
2
57,379
13889
3.40%
41,193
71.8%
14,001
24.4%
19342
2.3%
3
56,540
1,050
1.89%
413163
72.8%
10,747
19.0%
33798
6.7%
4
55,019
-471
-0.85%
14,326
26.0%
36,506
66.4%
1,785
3.2%
5
53,844
-1,646
-2.97%
21,494
39.9%
27,613
51.3%
2,232
4.1%
SOURCE: 1990 & 2000 CENSUS PL94-171
2000 Census PL94-171
2002 Redistricting Plan
03/19/02
RECOMMENDED PLAN
CENSUS 2000 POPULATION BY VOTING PRECINCT
BY SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT
2000CensusPL94-171
2002 Redistdctlng Plan
CENSUS 2000 POPULATION BY VOTING PRECINCT 2002 REDISTRICTING PLAN
BY SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT
OE COR.US C...ST, RECOMMENDED PLAN
~IN. MEM, VOTING TOTAL OF ANY RACE NON-HISPANIC
1 7 1.618 1,282 79.2% 193 11.9% 120 7.4% 23 1.4%
1 9 3,232 1,337 41,4% 1,804 55.8% 22 0.7% 69 2.1%
1 23 89 19 21.3% 68 764% I 1.1% I 1.1%
I 30 1,618 6T3 41 6% 108 6.7% 815 50.4% 22 1 4%
I 38 1,901 970 51 0% 74 3.9% 831 43~7% 26 1.4%
I 41 1,002 954 95.2% 44 44% 2 0.2% 2 02%
I 4,4 2,665 2,547 95,6% 89 33% 26 1 0% 3 0 1%
1 45 2,503 2.244 89 7% 163 65% 77 31% 19 0.8%
1 46 1,318 1,222 927% 44 33% 39 30% 13 1,0%
1 47 1.333 1,184 888% 64 48% 73 55% 12 0.9%
1 49 1,866 665 35.6% 1,153 61 8% 22 12% 26 1.4%
1 __1/ 51 2,467 1,511 612% 850 345% 74 30% 32 13%
I 52 1,423 1,048 736% 241 169% 120 8.4% 14 1.0~
1 61 1,793 1,315 733% 51 28% 408 228% 19 I 1%
1 76 2,126 2.039 95.9% 60 2.6% 20 0.9% 7 0.3~
1 77~ 874 791 90.5% 38 4.3% 37 42% 8 0.9~
I 79 1,973 1.509 76.5% 263 13.3% 159 8.1% 42 2.1~
I _2/ 81 727 445 61.2% 225 309% 42 58% 15 2.1~
I _Z/ 82 1,190 915 769% 224 188% 38 32% 13 11~
1 99 1,442 1,174 81.4% 205 142% 20 1 4% 43
I 1/ 100 3,644 2,064 56.6% 1,451 398% 48 1.3% 81 22~
1 101 5,2<90 2,370 448% 2,754 521% 58 1.1% 108 20~
I 103 1.573 533 33.9% 1,012 64.3% 16 1.0% 12 0 8~
1 107 3,452 788 228% 2,570 744% 30 0 9% 64 1.9~
1 __31 110 6,137 2,266 369% 3,600 58.7% 136 2.2% 135
I 111 1.412 696 493% 682 483% 13 09% 21 1.5~
'l~ ~ ~V~ S4,6~8 32,561 59.6% 18,030 33.0% 3,247 5.9% 830 1.5'~
2 I 2,022 971 48.0% 900 ~4.5% 103 51% 48 2 4~
2 21 441 92 20.9% 311 705% 7 1 6% 31 7.0%
2 31 1,192 1,019 855% 143 12.0% 17 1.4% 13 1.1~
2 33 1,491 1.113 74.6% 259 17.4% 90 6.0% 29 1
2 39 1,362 891 654% 390 28 6% 55 40% 26 1 9~
2 43 1,669 1.342 804% 173 10.4% 122 7.3% 32 1
2 48 2,374 1,407 59.3% 870 36 6% 49 2.1% 48 20~
2 50 1,058 674 637% 366 346% 10 0.9% 8 0 8~
2 53 1,461 1,182 80.9% 232 15 9% 33 23% 14 10~
2 56 2,556 2,138 836% 228 89% 153 6.0% 37 1 4%
2 57 1,510 1,198 79.3% 277 18.3% 26 I 7% 9 06~
2 58 1,776 655 36.9% 1,073 604% 13 0.7% 35 20%
2 4/ 59 1,510 585 38.7% 867 57.4% 24 I 6% 34 2.3~
2 62 2,055 ~.868 91.9% 125 61% 30 1.5% 12 06~
2 66 2,923 1,777 60.8% 1,008 345% 72 25% 66 23%
2 aJ 67 976 506 51.8% 443 45.4% 19 1.9% 8 0.8%
2 68 1,993 1,447 72.6% 475 238% 34 1.7% 37 I 9%
2 69 3,353 2,398 71.5% 834 24.9% 70 2.1% 51 15%
2 72 2,962 2,036 687% 911 274% 55 1.9% 60 2.0%
2 73 2.965 2,581 87.0% 295 9.9% 63 21% 26 0.9%
2 75 4,345 4,182 962% 108 2.5% 33 0.8% 22 0.5%
2 83 2,198 1,985 90.3% 140 64% 56 2.5% 17 0.8%
2 84 1,543 993 64.4% 469 30.4% 40 2.6% 41 27%
2 85 1.215 1,144 94.2% 54 4.4% 9 0 7% 8 0.7%
2 87 2,628 1,770 67.4% 762 290% 51 1.9% 45 1
2 94 3,277 1,797 54.8% 1,385 42 4% 50 1 5% 42 1.3%
2 96 1,611 1,266 78 6% 325 20.2% 9 06% 11 0 7%
2 97 2,228 1,880 84.4% 282 12.7% 44 2.0% 22 1.0%
2 109 685 276 40.3% 393 57,4% 5 0.7% 11 1.6%
2 Tc. tal ALL VP'j 57.379 41.193 7t.S% 14.0~1 24.4% 1,342 2.3% 843 1.5~
3 4 3,734 2,495 668% 1.017 27 2% 168 4.5% 54 1.4%
3 15 821 562 68+5% 209 25.5% 38 4.6% 12 1.5%
3 20 4,138 2,837 886% 955 231% 240 5.8% 106 2.6%
3 24 2,833 1,980 69.9% 540 19 I% 299 10.6% 14 05%
3 34 798 649 81 3% 135 169% 10 1.3% 4 0.5%
3 60 2,145 2,052 95.7% 76 35% 6 0.3% 11 0.5%
3 70 5,276 3,428 65.0% 1,475 28.0% 259 49% 114 2.2%
3 71 3,347 2,773 82.9% 486 14.5% 68 2.0% 20 0.6%
3 74 3,273 3,105 949% 110 34% 33 10% 25 0.8%
3 78 2,887 2,272 78.7% 98 3.4% 496 17.2% 21 0.7%
3 80 2,601 2,039 784% 75 29% 484 17.8% 23 0.9%
3 89 1,236 756 61.2% 453 367% 12 1.0% 15 1.2%
2000SMDOptlOnl .xls
2000CensusPL94 171
SIN. MEM.
DISTRICT
CENSUS 2000 POPULATION BY VOTING PRECINCT
BY SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
VOTING
I TOTAL OF ANY RACE
POPULAT ON H SPANICS I % IwHITE
PRECINCTS
93
95
98
106
113
114
116
121
3 Total ALL VP's
2002 REDISTRICTING PLAN
RECOMMENDED PLAN
NON-HISPANIC
I % IBLK/^FNvl I % IOTHER** I %
4,380 3,802 868% 357 8.2% 181 4.1% 40 09%
1,569 1,215 774% 306 19.5% 19 1 2% 29 1.8%
2,943 2,334 79 3% 99 3.4% 476 16.2% 32 1.1%
4,053 1,990 49.1% 1,750 43.2% 217 54% 96 2.4%
1,539 1,210 78.6% 21 1 4% 299 194% 9 0.6%
1,053 931 88.4% 60 57% 62 5.9% 0 0.0%
5,108 3,118 61.0% 1,602 31.4% 250 4.9% 138 27%
2,806 %615 57.6% 923 329% 199 7.1% 69 25%
56,540 41,163 72.8% 10,747 19.0% 3,79~ 6.7% 832 1.5%
_5/
2 4,036 1,659 41 I% 2,176 53.9% 100 2 5% 101 25%
5 1,203 334 27.8% 845 702% 5 0.4% 19 1 6%
_5/ 6 2,6C0 584 225% 1,730 66.5% 72 28% 214 8.2%
18 7,112 1.865 262% 4,181 588% 618 8.7% 448 6.3%
19 15 2 133% 13 867% 0 00% 0 00%
_6! 40 6,171 572 93% 5,352 86.7% 55 09% 192 3.1%
42 499 80 16~0% 414 830% 2 04% 3 0.6%
63 3,276 903 276% 2.268 692% 19 06% 86 2 6%
64~ 2,036 251 123% 1+744 857% 3 0.1% 38 I 9%
65 4,310 946 21 9% 3,172 73.6% 50 1.4% 133 3.1%
86 832 208 25.0% 810 733% 7 0.8% 7 0 8%
90 t,399 741 530% 574 410% 57 41% 27 1.9%
91 4,614 1+424 309% 2+765 599% 227 49% 198 43%
92 2,544 790 311% 1,640 645% 59 2.3% 55 22%
117 5,121 849 166% 3,868 75.5% 116 23% 268 56%
120 3,731 1,694 454% 1,824 489% 113 30% 1C0 27%
122 5,520 1,424 25.8% 3,330 60.3% 273 4.9% 493 89%
55,019 14.326 26.0% 36,506 6~.4% 1,785 3.2% 2,402 4.4%
3 4,659 1,727 37.1% 2,517 54.0% 128 2.7% 287 6.2%
__7/ 8 7,054 2,719 38.5% 3,688 52.3% 309 4.4% 338 4.8%
__8/ 16 384 126 32.8% 257 66.9% 0 0.0% I 03%
17 5,016 2,764 551% 1,758 35.0% 276 5 5% 218 43%
__81 26 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
__91 29 8,884 2,827 31.8% 5.114 57.6% 347 3.9% 596 67%
101 32 6,270 2,457 39 2% 3,260 52.0% 303 48% 250 40%
88 3,626 1,668 46.0% 1.698 46.8% 135 3.7% 125 3.4%
112 3,361 1,371 408% 1,815 54.0% 80 2.4% 95 2.8%
115 3,405 1,174 34.5% 1,938 56 9% 123 3.6% 170 5.0%
116 5,394 2,386 44 2% 2,527 46.8% 278 5.2% 203 38%
119 5,791 2.275 39.3% 3,041 525% 253 44% 222 3.8%
ALL VP'I 53,844 21,494 3g.~A, 27,613 51.3% 2,232 4.1% 2,5~5 4.7%
5 Total
Grand Total ALL SMD's 277,45~ 150,737 54.3% 10~,897 38.5% 12,4~4 4.5% 7.412 2.7%
NOTE~: a.) Footnotes specify young precinct changes made by NueCes County Commissioners court on Dec. 2001.
b.) The consOlidaUon of Voting Precincts 16 and 26 caused Single Member District ~5 boundary line to be
diverted to encompass the land area once occupied by Voting Precinct 26. See Footnote ~.
All remaining Voting Precinct changes by Nueces County did not affect the City's Redistricting Lines.
24
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: April 16, 2002)
Case No. C0202-01A~ City of Corpus Christi: Zone newly annexed areas to an "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District and "B-2A" Barrier Island Business District on Nueces County Park No. 2 (Packery Channel
Park), located on the east side of South Padre Island Drive, north of Verdemar Drive.
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (03/13/02): Denial of the "R-lB" and
"B-2A' Districts, and in lieu thereof, approval of an "F-R" Farm-Rural District on Tracts I and 2.
Requested Council Action: Denial of the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and "B-2A" Barrier Island
Business District, and in lieu thereof, approval of an "F-R' Farm-Rural District on Tracts l and 2 and adoption of
the attached ordinance.
Purpose of Request: Appropriate zoning for newly annexed area.
Summary: The subject property consists of two (2) tracts of land totaling 50.01 acres under consideration for
annexation and zoning. This area is known as Area A, Tract 1 (30 acres) and Tract 2 (20.0t acres). The property is
east of South Padre lsland Drive, west of the Laguna Madre and north of Verdemar Drive. Tracts 1 and 2 are
located in an area designated as a Coastal Barrier Resources Act (COBRA), which prohibits use of federal funds for
loans or grants for development, insurance, or emergency relief funds (FEMA) for repairs or reconstruction.
Tract I is privately owned and is contiguous to a "B-2A" District property to the north and west. A "B-2A" District
would allow a mixed residential and commercial development while maintaining an open space along the Laguna
Madre area. The appropriate zoning classification for Tract 1 is a "B-2A' Barrier Island District.
Tract 2 is owned by Nueces County and is known as the Packery Channel County Park. It functions as an open
space area for the public while housing the Visitor's Center and County Maintenance Facility on the property. Under
state statute, the county will continue its responsibility for maintenance of the park and waterfi'ont area after
annexation. For areas that are publicly owned, it has been Staffs and City Council's policy to recommend and
approve an "R-lB" District for those areas. However, at the Planning Commission public hearing, the Commission
recommended the "F-R" Farm-Rural District as providing a zoning district that is more consistent with continuation
of the park use at the property than the "R-lB" Disla'ict.
Notification: On February 25, 2002, a newspaper notice was published in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times legal
section. To date, there have been no comments supporting or opposing the proposed zoning.
Director of Planning
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
l) Zoning Report Pages 2--4
2) Planning Commission Minutes Pages 5-6
4) Ordinances Pages 7-10
H:\PLN-DIR\ERMA\WORD\AGENDMEM\C0202-01AAGENDAMEMO.DOC
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No.:
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
Map [No.:
Applicant:
LeEal Description/Location:
C0202-01A
March 13, 2002
F20-C-D
City of Corpus Christi
Being a tract of land consisting of 50.01 acres on property known as Nueces County Park #2/Packery
Channel Park. The tract of land is located along the east side of South Padre Island Drive, north of
Verdemar Drive.
Area of Request:
Annexation Area:
Proposed Zoning:
50.01 acres
Area A, Tracts 1 and 2
"FR" Farm Rural District on Tract 1 and '*R-lB"
One-Family Dwelling District on Tract 2.
Undeveloped land and Nueces County Park
Current Use of Property:
Adjacent Zonine:
North, West - "B-2A" Barrier Island District
South - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District, "B-2A" Barrier Island Business District.
East - "FR" Farm -Rural District.
Adjacent Land Use:
North - Undeveloped land.
South - Single-family residences.
East - Laguna Madre/Packery Channel.
West - Undeveloped land, medical clinic with helipad and motel.
Adiacent Streets/Classification:
State Highway 361 - rural arterial of 250-foot right-of-way.
Zoning Report
Case No. C0202-01A
Page 2
Zoning History of Property:
Not applicable.
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
In February 1997, Lots lB through 5B, Block 1, located on the east side of Ambrosia Street, north
of Marina Drive and west of the subject property, were denied a "B-2A" District and were granted
a Special Permit for a parking lot. The development has not occurred and the Special Permit has
expired.
In September 1997, Lots 11 through 15, Block 71, located across South Padre Island Drive west of
the subject property, were denied a "B-4" District and were granted a Special Permit for a miniature
golf course.
In February 1998, Lot 5, Block 4, located along South Padre Island Drive and west of the subject
property, was denied an "I-2" District and was granted a Special Permit for a helipad.
Planning Staff Analysis:
The subject property consists of two (2) tracts of land totaling 50.01 acres under consideration for
annexation and zoning. This area is known as Area A, Tract 1 (30 acres) and Tract 2 (20.01 acres).
The property is east of South Padre Island Drive, west of the Lagtma Madre and north of Verdemar
Drive. Tract 1 and 2 are located in an area designated as a Coastal Barrier Resources Area
(COBRA), which prohibits use of loans or grants for development, insurance, or emergency relief
funds (FEMA) for repairs or reconstruction.
Tract 1 is privately own and is contiguous to "B-2A" District property to the north and west. A
"B~2A" District would allow a mixed development while maintaining an open space along the
Laguna Madre area. The appropriate zoning classification for Tract 1 is a "B-2A" Barrier Island
District.
Tract 2 is owned by Nueces County and is known as the Packery Channel County Park. It functions
as an open space area for the public while housing the Visitor's Center and County Maintenance
Facility on the property. Under state statute, the county will continue its responsibility for
maintenance of the public land and waterfront area after annexation. All other operations relative to
the park will remain the county's responsibility.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of "F-R" Farm-Rural District on Tracts 1 and 2.
Attachments:
Zoning Map
H :\PLN -DIR\ERMA\WORD~ZONRPTS\C0202-01A.DOC
R-lB
F-R
TRACT 1
ACT 2
O.C.L
R-lB ~ A-2
AT
B-2A
CASE C0202-OqA
(21'Y OF COre,US Q-[mS1'L Ta(AS
PACKERY CHANNEL CO. PARK & ADJOINING LAND
AREA A
0 Ft.
2000 Ft.
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
Planning commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
City of Corpus Christi: C0202-01A
REQUEST:
Annex to "B-2A" Barrier Island District on Tract 1 and "R-lB" One-family Dwelling
District on Tract 2 on land consisting of 50.01 acres of property known as Nueces County
Park #2/Packerty Channel Park, and located along the east side of South Padre Island
Drive, north of Verdemar Drive.
Mr. Saldafia presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and surrounding
property. The subject property consists of two (2) tracts of land totaling 50.01 acres under consideration
for annexation and zoning. This area is known as Area A, Tract I (30 acres) and Tract 2 (20.01 acres). The
property is east of South Padre Island Drive, west of the Laguna Madre and north of Verdemar Drive.
Tracts 1 and 2 are located hi an area designated as a Coastal Barrier Resources Area (COBRA), which
prohibits use of loans or grants for development, insurance, or emergency relief funds (FEMA) for repairs
or reconstruction. Tract 1 is privately owned and is contiguous to "B-2A" District property to the north and
west. A "B-2A" District would allow a mixed development use while maintaining an open space along the
Laguna Madre area. The appropriate zoning classification for Tract 1 is a "B~2A" Barrier Island District.
Tract 2 is owned by Nueces County and is known as the Packery Channel County Park. It functions as an
open space area for the public while housing the Visitor's Center and County Maintenance Facility on the
property. Under State statute, the county will continue its responsibility for maintenance of the public land
and waterfront area after annexation. All other operations relative to the park will remain the County's
responsibility. For areas that are publicly owned, it has been Staff and City Council's policy to recommend
and approve a "R-lB" District for those areas. Approval of "B-2A" District on Tract 1 and "R-lB" District
on Tract 2.
Mr. Saldafia said that public notification was required via a generally circulated newspaper and not
individual property owners within a 200-foot radius.
Commissioner Sween-McGloin asked how long has the City has been recommending the "R-lB"
District for parks. Mr. Saldafia said that most parks are located in the "R-lB" District. He added that they
are public playgrounds and are outlined in the "R-1B" District uses.
Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing.
Rick Guerra, 14609 Villa Maria Isabella, said that he owns property near Packery Channel and
asked why a park is being zoned as residential and also asked whether there would be residential
development on the park. He added that the "F-R" District would be a better zoning option for the subject
property. Mr. Guerra informed the Commission that he spoke with two engineers who were taking soil
samples on the subject property and was told that the subject property was being used for dredging for the
maintenance material site. He asked whether the dredging could affect the "o-plot" and said that some
consideration needed to be given to the water and storm drainage qualifies. Mr. Guerra asked for
gaarantees to protect the parkland.
Mr. Gunning said that he would forward the information provided by Mr. Guerra to 'Angel
Escobar, Director of Engineering Services and provide an update to the commission in the future.
With regard to zoning the subject property "F-R" District, Mr. Gunning said that the Commission
could recommend any zoning district. The "R-lB" District does not allow businesses and is the most
protective for the property. He added that any lands dedicated as pubhc parkland shall remain pubhc
parkland. There would be a requirement for a city election to change the parkland.
Al Lizakowski, 14618 Villa Maria Isabella, provided photographs of the subject area. He said that
the area contained mostly wetlands. He added that the neighbors have maintained the property and have
also planted trees. He said that the Audubon Society uses the area. He expressed concern with the Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) zone excluding both lots, which could allow development of a business. He
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
Case No. C0202-01A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 2
expressed concern about creating unfair competition and asked that the property be included in the TIF or
be,rezoned to a residential district to maintain the wildlife in the area. He suggested an "RE" District.
Commissioner Sween-McGloin asked if oil and gas drilling could be done on "FR" and "RE"
Districts. Mr. Doyle Curtis, Assistant City Attomey, said that the "FR" District allows drilling. Mr.
Gunmng said that the infi'astmcture is in place, but staff would not want to recommend an "FR" District
and said that he believes an "R-1B" District is critical in order to protect the property.
Cormmssioner Sween-McGloin said that the area has similarities to the Nueces River area. Since
there is no pending plans for the property, she recommended that the property be zoned "FR" District.
Mr. Gunning said that "R-lB" District would be good for the city and added that property zoned
"B-2A" Dis~ict does not mean that the property would be developed with businesses.
Charrman Berlanga asked whether the TIF area could be expanded. Mr. Gannmg answered in the
negative.
commissioner Richter said that the area is a hamer island and asked that "R-lB" District not be a
holding zone. She added that there is oppommity to think of a new way to develop on a bamer island and
still protect the vegetation. "R-lB" District does not require a certain type of vegetation. She said staff
should encourage the development of more permeable land and narrower streets to preserve the land.
comnUssioner Amsler said that he did not think that people should not live in the area and that
staff and the ComrmSsion needed to weigh private property rights against the environment.
Art Olson spoke on behalf of the Audubon Club. He said that the Audubon Club owns 17 pieces
of land and added that the club purchased the property with the intent to not develop on it.
Public hearing was closed.
Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Amsler, to forward a recommendation of "FR" District
on Tracts I and 2. Motion passed with Mims and Pusley being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACTS TOTALING 50.01
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA A, TRACT 1 AND 2, BY ZONING AS
"FR" FARM-RURAL DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING APPLICATION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR NONCONFORMING USE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION;AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of the City of Corpus Christi, for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
Mamh 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by zoning the newly annexed tracts totaling 50.01 acres, designated as Area
A, Tracts I and 2, known as the Packery Channel Park Area, including Nueces County
Park #2/Packery Channel Park (Tract 2, containing 20,01 acres) and the adjoining 30
acres (Tract 1), and located along the east side of South Padre Island Drive and north
of Verdemar Drive, as an "F-R" Farm-Rural District. A metes and bounds description
for Area A, Tracts I and 2 is attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
H:~.EG-DIR\DOYLEDCU RTIS~VlYDOCS~2002~P&ZO RD02~ZON EANNX.ORD~DDC~ZC020201 .ANX.A.DOC
'7
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Chdsti.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon wdtten request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
Doyle D. ~'urtis -
Senior A§sistant City Attorney
H:~LEG-DIR\DOYLEDCU RTIS'~IYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~ZON EANNX.ORD~DDC~ZC020201 .ANX.A. DOC
METES AND BOUNDS
(Packery Channel County Park)
50.01 acres, more or less, consisting of 20.01-acre Packery Channel County Park, also known as
Nueces County Park No. 2, and a 30-acre tract described in Vol. 2229, page 155, Nueces County,
Texas, Deed Records, said 50.01-acre tract, more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of the southeast boundary line of Packery Channel
County Park and the northeast right-of-way line of Park Road 22 (South Padre Island Drive) for
the south comer of the tract herein described;
THENCE, northwesterly with the northeast right-of-way line of said Park Road 22, its curves
and its angles, to the south comer of Lot 5, Block 4, Padre Island - Corpus Christi Section 18, as
shown in ¥olume 57, Page 105, Nueces County, Texas, plat records, for the southerly west
comer of Packery Channel County Park, and an outside comer of this tract;
THENCE northeasterly with the southeast boundary line of said Lot 5, to its east comer thereof,
for an inside comer of Packery Channel County Park and an inside comer of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly, with the northeast boundary line of said Block 4, Padre Island - Corpus
Christi Section 18, its curves and its angles, to its north comer thereof, for the west comer of the
aforementioned 30-acre tract, an inside comer of Block 2, Padre Island - Corpus Christi Section
18, as shown in Volume 38, Page 69 and 70, Nueces County, Texas, plat records, and the west
comer of this tract;
THENCE northeasterly, with the line common to said Block 2, Padre Island - Corpus Christi
Section 18 and the aforementioned 30-acre tract, to a point on the westerly shoreline of existing
Packery Channel, for the north comer of this tract;
THENCE southeasterly, with the meanders of said westerly shoreline of exisfmg packery
Channel, to a point, for the east comer of Packery Channel County Park, and the east comer of
this tract,
THENCE southwesterly, with the southeast boundary line of said Packery Channel County Park,
to a point on the northeast right-of-way line of Park Road 22, for the POINT OF BEGINNING.
C0202-01A
EXHIBIT A
R-lB
F-R
TRACT1
TRACT 2
O.C.L
R-lB
AT
B-2A
CASE C0202-01A
cay OF COP,~US CHmSl'C 'ha(As
PACt(ERY CHAI~ CO. PARK & ADJOINING LAND
AREA A
0 Ft.
2000 Ft.
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
/0
EXHIBIT A
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACTS TOTALING 50.01
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA A, TRACT t AND 2, BY ZONING AS
"B-2A" BARRIER ISLAND DISTRICT ON TRACT I AND "R-lB" ONE-
FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON TRACT 2; AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS
FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
NONCONFORMING USE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of the City of Corpus Christi, for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
March 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended with respect to the newly annexed tracts totaling 50.01 acres, designated as
Area A, Tracts 1 and 2, known as the Packery Channel Park Area, including Nueces
County Park #2/Packery Channel Park (Tract 2, containing 20,01 acres) and the
adjoining 30 acres (Tract 1), and located along the east side of South Padre Island
Drive and north of Verdemar Ddve, by zoning Tract 1 as "B-2A" Barrier Island District
and Tract 2 as "R-1B" One-Family Dwelling District. A metes and bounds description for
Area A, Tracts 1 and 2 is attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
H:\LEG-DIR\DOYLEDCURTIS\MYDOCS~O02\P&ZORD02~ONEANNX.ORD\DDC~ZC020201 .ANX.B.DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM ~10 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
C ty ne.y,_ ,¢/1 _,L--
Doyle [:~urtis
Senior Assistant City Attorney
H:~LEG-DIR\DOYLEDCURTIS\MYDOCS~2002~P&ZORDO21ZONEANNX.ORD\DDC~C020201.ANX.B.DOC
Page 3 of 3
Corpus Christi, Texas
__day of ,2002
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H:%EG-DIR\DOYLE DCU RTIS\MYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~ZO N EAN NX.ORD\D DC~C020201 .ANX.B.DOC
1- T'---'~ '
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING-ZONING (City Council Action Date: April 16,2002)
Case No. C0202-02A~ City of Corpus Christi: Zone newly annexed areas to an "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District and "AT" Apartment Tourist District on 230.23 acres out of William Bryan Survey 606, Land
Survey 64, located on the southeast side of State Highway 361, northeast of South Padre Island Drive.
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (03/13/02): Denial of the "R-lB" District,
and in lieu thereof, approval of an "F-R" Farm-Rural District on Tract 1 and "AT" Apartmem Tourist District on
Tract 2.
Requested Council Action: Denial of the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling Distxict, and in lieu thereof,
approval of an "F-R" Farm-Rural District on Tract 1 and "AT" Apartment Tourist District on Tract 2 and
adoption of the aRach6d ordinance.
Purpose of Request: Appropriate zoning for newly annexed area.
Summary: Tract I of the subject property is publicly owned and Tract 2 of the subject property is privately owned,
totaling 230.23 acres. Tract 1 located south of Mustang Island State Park is owned by Nueces County and contains
221 acres with 4, 211 feet of beach fi-ontage. Along the south boundary of Tract 1 is 9.23 acres Tract 2 that extends
2,010 feet along the beach frontage. State Highway 361 and Zahn Road provide access to Tract 1 and 2,
respectively. Tract 1 is undeveloped and provides open space for public use. Under state statute, the county will
continue its responsibility for maintenance of the Gulf Beach frontage at~er annexation. For areas that are publicly
owned, it has been Staffs and City Council policy to recommend and approve an "R-lB" District for those areas.
However, at the Planning Commission public hearing, the Comrmssion recommended the "F-R" Farm-Rural District
as providing a zoning district that is more consistent with continuation of the park use at the property than the
"R-lB' District. Tract 2 is recommended for an "AT" District and would continue as a public beach area.
Notification: On February 25, 2002, a newspaper notice was published in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times legal
section. To date, there have been no comments supporting or opposing the proposed zoning.
Michael N. Gunning, AIC'P
Director of Planning
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
1) Zoning Report Pages 2-5
2) Planning Comnnssion Minutes Page 6
4) Ordinances Pages 7-11
H :\P LN -DIR~ERMA\WO RD~AGEN DM EM \C0202 -02AAGENDAM EM O,DOC
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No.:
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
Map No.:
Applicant:
Legal Description/Location:
C0202-02A
March 13, 2002
E21A, F20D, and F21C
City of Corpus Christi
Being 230.23 acres out of the William Bryan Survey 606, Land Survey 24, located along the east
side of State Highway 361, fronting the Gulf of Mexico and north of South Padre Island Drive.
Area of Annexation:
Proposed Zoning:
Current Use of Property:
Purpose of Request:
Ad|acent Zoning:
North - "R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District
South - "AT" Apartment-Tourist District
East - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District
West - (across SH 361) "F-R" Farm-Rural District
Area B - Tract 1 - 221acres
Tract 2 - 9.23 acres
Tract 1 - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District
Tract 2 - "AT" Apartment-Tourist District
Undeveloped land.
Appropriate zoning designation on newly
annexed territory.
Adjacent Land Use:
North - Mustang Island State Park.
South - Undeveloped land.
East - Gulf of Mexico.
West - (across State Highway 361) Undeveloped land.
Zoning Report
Case No. C0202-02A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 2
Number of Residential Units Allowed:
"R-lB" - 44 units (1 unit per 5 acres).
"AT" - 10,028 units (43.56 dwelling units per acre).
Estimated Traffic Generation:
Single-family residences: 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 44 dwelling units
= 440 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Condominiums - 5.86 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 10,028 dwelling units
= 58,764 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Adiacent Streets/Classification:
a) State Highway 361 - rural arterial of 250-foot right-of-way.
Zoning History of Property:
Not applicable.
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
In December 1999, properties northwest of State Highway 361 and north of Mustang Island State
Park was annexed into the city and zoned an "AT" District to the north and a "F-R" District
northwest of State Highway 361.
In December 2001, Mustang Island State Park north of the subject property was annexed into the city
and zoned an "R-lB" District.
Planning StaffAnalysis:
Tract 1 of the subject property is publicly own and Tract 2 of the subject property is privately own,
totaling 230.23 acres. Tract 1 located south of Mustang Island State Park is own by Nueces County
and is 221 acres with 4, 211 feet of beach frontage. Along the south boundary of Tract 1 is 9.23 acres
Tract 2 that extends 2,010 feet along the beach frontage. State Highway 361 and Zahn Road provide
access to Tract 1 and 2. Tract 1 is undeveloped and provides open space for public use. Under state
statute, the county will continue its responsibility for maintenance of the Gulf Beach area after
annexation. For areas that are publicly owned, it has been Staffs and City Council policy to
recommend and approve an "F-R" District for those areas. Tract 2 is recommended for an "AT"
District and would continue as a public beach area.
Zoning Report
Case No, C0202-02A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 3
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of the "F-R" District on Tract 1 and approval of an "AT" District on Tract 2.
Attachments:
Zoning Map
H :~P LN -D IR\ERMA\WO RD~ZONKPTS\C0202-02AREP ORT.DOC
R-tB
R-tB
F-R
TRACT1
R-lB
AT
e-2^ TRACT2
-lB
GULF OF
MEXICO
CASE C0202-02A
czl'Y OF C{31~jS Q-a~ZSI'~, TEXAS
NI.I~-C~ CO. PFI~ i 't'/l~RlC LOWEll BEACH FRONTAGE
OR. dE
AREA B
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Def3artment, 08FEB02/AMF
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
City of Corpus Christi: C0202-02A
REQUEST:
Annex to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "AT" Apartment-
Tourist Dist*ict on Tract 2 being 230.23 acres out of the William Bryan Survey 606, Land
Survey 24, located along the east side of State Highway 361, fronting the Gulf of Mexico
and north of South Padre Island Drive.
Mr. Saldafla provided a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area.
Tract I of the subject property is publicly owned and Tract 2 of the subject property is also privately
owned, totaling 230.23 acres. Tract 1, located south of Mustang Island State Park, is owned by Nueces
County and is 221 acres with 4, 211 feet of beach frontage. Along the south boundary of Tract 1 is 9.23
acres Tract 2 that extends 2,010 feet along the beach frontage. State Highway 361 and Zahn Road provide
access to Tract 1 and 2. Tract I is undeveloped and provides open space for public use. Under state
statute, the county will continue its responsibility for maintenance of the Gulf Beach area after annexation.
For areas that are publicly owned, it has been Staff and City Council's policy to recommend and approve
an "F-R" District for those areas. Tract 2 is recommended for an "AT" District and would continue as a
public beach area. Therefore, approval of the "F-R' District on Tract 1 and approval of an "AT" District
on Tract 2.
Commissioner Sween-McGloin asked about the sliver of property located on the zoning map. Mr.
Saldafia said that the area is located within the dune protection area and cannot be developed. It is privately
owned and in order to allow vendors, the "AT" District it is required.
Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public
hearing was closed.
Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Richter, to forward a recommendation of "FW' District
on Tract 1 and an "AT" District on Tract 2. Motion passed with Pusley and Minas being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACTS TOTALING 230.23
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA B, BY ZONING TRACT I AS "F-R"
FARM-RURAL DISTRICT AND TRACT 2 AS "AT" APARTMENT-
TOURIST DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO
ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING APPLICATION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR NONCONFORMING USE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of the City of Corpus Christi for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
March 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by zoning the newly annexed tracts totaling 230.23 acres, designated as Area
B, Tracts 1 and 2, out of the William Bryan Survey 606, Land Survey 24, located along
the east side of State Highway 361, fronting the Gulf of Mexico and north of South
Padre Island Drive, as "F-R" Farm-Rural District on Tract I and "AT" Apartment-Tourist
District on Tract 2. A metes and bounds description for Area B, Tracts 1 and 2 is
attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
H:~LEGLDIR~DOYLEDCU RTIS\MYDOCS~002~P&ZORDO2~ONEANNX,ORD\DDC~C020202.ANX.A. DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Chdsti.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
City ~o may ,~ ~ --
Doyle D(~turtis
Senior Assistant City Attorney
H:~LEG-DI R~DOYLEDC U RTIS'~MYDOCS~002'~&ZORD02~ZONEANNX.ORD~DC~ZC020202.ANX.A. DOC
METES AND BOUNDS
(Nueces County Land South of Mustang Island)
221.00 acres, more or less, out of the William Bryan survey No. 606, A-45, described in
Document No. 888926, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, located southwest of adjacent to
Mustang Island State Park, and more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, on the southeast right-of-way line of existing State Highway 361,
the north comer of a 137.73 acre tract, now or formerly owned by Eric C. Lower, described in
Document No. 956588, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, for the west comer of the tract
here-in described;
THENCE, northeasterly with the southeast right-of-way line of said State Highway 361, its
curves and its angles, to a point on the southwest boundary line of Mustang Island State Park, for
a point on the present city limit line established by Ordinance No. 15415, dated March 19, 1980,
and the north comer of this tract;
THENCE, southeasterly, with said present city limit line, to a point on the 1.37 foot line above
mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of Mustang Island with elevation based on U.S.C. and
G.S. datum of 1929, for a comer in present city limit line and the east comer of this tract;
THENCE, southwesterly, with said present city limit line, to a point in line with the northeast
boundary line of the aforementioned 137.73 acre tract, for the south comer of this tract;
THENCE, northwesterly with the northeast boundary line of said 137.73 acre tract, to its north
comer thereof for the POINT OF BEGINNING.
C0202-02A
TRACT 1
EXHIBIT A
q
METES AND BOUNDS
(Beach Frontage north of Zahn Road)
9.23 acres, more or less,, out of the William Bryan survey No. 606, A-45, located southeast of
and adjacent to a 137.73-acre tract, now or formerly owned by Eric C. Lower, described in
Document No. 956588, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, said 9.23-acre tract more
particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of the southwest boundary line of said 137.73-acre
tract and the vegetation line along the Gulf of Mexico side of Mustang Island, a comer in the
present city limit line establish by Ordinance No. 023889, dated December 28, 1999) for the
southwest comer of the tract herein described;
THENCE, northeasterly, with said vegetation line, the present city limit line, to a point on the
southwest boundary line of a 221-acre tract, now or formerly owned by Nueces County,
described in Document No. 888926, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, for the northwest
comer of this tract;
THENCE, southeasterly with the southwest boundary line of said 221-acre tract, to a point on the
1.37 foot line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of Mustang Island with elevation
based on U.S.C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present city limit line established by
Ordinance No. 015415, dated March 19, 1980, and the northeast comer of this tract;
THENCE southwesterly, with said present city limit line, to a point in line with the southwest
boundary line of the aforementioned 137.73-acre tract, for the southeast comer of this tract;
THENCE, northwesterly with the southwest boundary line of said 137.73 acre tract, to a point on
the vegetation line for the POINT OF BEGINNING.
C0202-02A
TRACT 2
EXHIBIT A
/0
R-lB
R-lB
F-R
R-lB
AT
TRACT 2
-lB
GULF OF
MEXICO
CASE C0202-02A
(3'fY OF COm~$ ~ TEXAS
NLI~CE~ CO. PR(;:~'~ i V/ERIC LOWER BEACH FRONTAGE
AREA B
OR. 4gOOFL
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
EXI-iIBIT A Il
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACTS TOTALING 230.23
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA B, BY ZONING TRACT I AS "R-lB"
ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT AND TRACT 2 AS "AT"
APARTMENT-TOURIST DISTRICT; AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS
FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
NONCONFORMING USE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of the City of Corpus Christi for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
Mamh 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended with respect to the newly annexed tracts totaling 230.23 acres, designated as
Area B, Tracts 1 and 2, out of the William Bryan Survey 606, Land Survey 24, located
along the east side of State Highway 361, fronting the Gulf of Mexico and north of South
Padre Island Drive, by zoning Tract 1 as "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District and Tract
2 as "AT" Apartment-Tourist District. A metes and bounds description for Area B,
Tracts 1 and 2 is attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full fome and effect.
H:\LEGiDIR~DOYLEDCU RTIS'tMYDOCS~.O02~P&ZORD02~ZON EAN NX.O R D\D DC~.C020202,ANX,B.DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 10 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
c tyA l,% // /7 /-
Doyle ~.. (~rt~ v
Senior Assistant City Attorney
H:\LEG~D~R\D~YLED~URT~S~v1YD~S~2~2\P&Z~RD~2~Z~NEANN~RD\DDC~C~2~2~2~AN~B~D~C
Page 3 of 3
Corpus Christi, Texas
__day of ,2002
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Samuel L Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H:\LEG-DIR\DOYLEDCURTIS\MYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~ZONEAN NX.ORD\DDC~ZC020202.ANX.B.DOC
-~- ~ . ~,~
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: April 16, 2002)
Case No. C0202-03A~ City of Corpus Christi: Zone newly annexed areas to an "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District on Nueces County Park No. 1 (Padre Balli Park), located on the e~5¢ide of South Padre Island
Drive, south of Whitecap Boulevard.
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (03/13/02): Denial of the "R-lB" District,
and in lieu thereof, approval of an "F-R" Farm-Rural District.
Requested Council Action: Denial of the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District, and in lieu thereof,
approval of an "F-R" Farm-Rural District and adoption of the attached ordinance.
Purpose of Request: Appropriate zoning for newly annexed area.
Summary: The subject property is known as Padre Balti Park and is owned by Nueces County and consist of
195.92 acres that is under consideration for annexation and zoning. It functions as the Padre Balli County Park with
1.26 miles of beach fi'ontage, along the Gulf of Mexico. Within the subject area is the Padre Balli Park Road, the
Bob Hall Pier and public beach access roads g4, 5 and 6. The property is east of South Padre Island Drive (Park
Road 22), west of the Gulf of Mexico, north of Sea Pines Drive and south of Whitecap Boulevard.
The subject property is located in an area known as Coastal Barrier Resources Act (COBRA). As a designated
COBRA area, Federal loans or grants for development, insurance or emergency relief funds (FEMA) for repairs or
reconstruction are not permitted. The majority of the land area has public development improvement potential.
Under state statute, the county will continue its responsibility for maintenance of the Gulf beach area after
annexation. All other operations relative to the park will continue as the county's responsibility.
Notification: On February 25, 2002, a newspaper notice was published in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times legal
section. To date, there have been no comments supporting or opposing the proposed zoning.
Director of Planning
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
1) Zoning Report
2) Planning Comnnssion Minutes
4) Ordinances
H:~P LN-DIR\EKMA\WORD~AGENDM EM\C0202 -03AAGENDAMEMO.DOC
Pages
Page
Pages
2-4
5
6-13
ZONING REPORT
Case No.: C0202-03A
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
March 13, 2002
Map No.:
D19B, D20A
Applicant:
City of Corpus Christi
Legal Description/Location:
Being 195.92 acres out of land encompassing what is known as the Padre Balli Park (Nueces County
Park No. 1), located between South Padre Island Drive and the Gulf of Mexico, south of Whitecap
Boulevard.
Area of Annexation:
Area C - 195.92 acres
Proposed Zoning:
"R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District
Current Use of Property:
Undeveloped land.
Purpose of Request:
Adjacent Zoning:
Appropriate zoning designation on newly
annexed territory.
North - "B-2A" Barrier Island District and "A-2" Apartment House District
South - "A-T" Apartment House District
East - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District
West - "B-2A" Barrier Island District (across Park Road 22)
Adiacent Land Use:
North - Commercial, single-family residences and undeveloped land.
South - Horse stables, single-family residence, and undeveloped land.
East - (across Park Road 22) Charter school, commercial, church and single-family residences.
West - Gulf of Mexico.
Number of Residential Units Allowed:
"F-R" - 39 units (1 trait per 5 acres)
"R-lB"-1,422.37 units (7.26 dwelling unit per acre on 195.92 acres)
Zoning Report
Case No. C0202-03A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 2
Estimated Traffic Generation:
"F-R" - Single-family residences: 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 39
dwelling units = 390 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
"R-lB" - Single-family residences: 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 1,422
dwelling units = 14,223 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Adiacent Streets/Classification:
a) South Padre Island Drive (Park Road 22) - rural arterial
Zoning History of Propert3,:
There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years.
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
In November 2001, 1,281 acres south of Sea Pines Drive and to the east of the Laguna Madre was
annexed and zoned with an "R-1B/SP" for a mixed use development on 754 acres; an "AT/SP" for
a mixed use development on 476 acres and an "AT" District on 51 acres,"
Planning Staff Analysis:
The subject property is own by Nueces County and consist of 195.92 acres that is under
consideration for annexation and zoning. It functions as the Padre Balli County Park with 1.26 miles
of beach frontage, along the Gulf of Mexico. Within the subject area is the Padre Balli Park Road,
the Bob Hall Pier and public beach access roads g4, 5 and 6. The property is east of South Padre
Island Drive (Park Road 22), west of the Gulf of Mexico, north of Sea Pines Drive and south of
Whitecap Boulevard.
The subject property is located in an area known as Coastal Barrier Resources Area (COBRA). As
a designated COBRA area, Federal loans or grants for development, insurance or emergency relief
funds (FEMA) for repairs or reconstruction are not permitted. The majority of the land area has
public development improvement potential. Under state statute, the county will continue its
responsibility for maintenance of the Gulf beach area after annexation. All other operations relative
to the park will continue as the county's responsibility.
Staff Recommendation:
Denial of the "R-I B" One-family Dwelling District, and in lieu thereof, approval of the "F-R" Farm_
Rural District.
Attachments:
H:Lv LN- DIRGE RMA\WORD~ZONRPTS \C0202.03 AKEPORT.DOC
Zoning Map
R-lB
B-2
R-lB
SP
AT/
R-lB
PADRE BALU
COUNTY PARK
GULF OF
MEXICO
CASE C0'202--03A
~ OF corn,us cHP-z~, Tm(AS
AREA C
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
City of Corpus Christi: C0202-03A
REQUEST:
Annex to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on property described as being 195.92
acres out of land encompassing what is known as the Padre Balli Park (Nueces County
Park No. 1 ), and located between South Padre Island Drive and the Gulf of Mexico, south
of Whitecap Boulevard.
Mr. Saldafla provided a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding
area. The subject property is owned by Nueces County and consists of 195.92 acres that is under
consideration for annexation and zoning. It functions as the Padre Balli County Park with 1.26 miles of
beach fxontage, along the Gulf of Mexico. Within the subject area is the Padre Balli Park Road, the Bob
Hall Pier and public beach access roads #4, 5 and 6. The property is east of South Padre Island Drive (Park
Road 22), west of the Gulf of Mexico, north of Sea Pines Drive and south of Whitecap Boulevard.
The subj6ct property is located in an area known as Coastal Barrier Resources Area (COBRA).
As a designated COBRA area, federal loans or grants for development, insurance or emergency relief funds
(FEMA) for repairs or reconstruction are not permitted. The majority of the land area has public
development improvement potential. Under state statute, the county will continue its responsibility for
maintenance of the Gulf beach area after annexation. All other operations relative to the park will continue
as the county's responsibility.
For areas that are publicly own, it has been Staff and City Council's policy to recommend and
approve a "R-lB" One-Family Dwelling District for those areas. Therefore, the appropriate zoning
classification for the subject property is a "R-lB" One-Family Dwelling District. Therefore, staff's
recommendation is for approval of the rezoning request.
Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared ia favor or opposition. Public
hearing was closed.
Motion by Sween-McGloin, seconded by Amsler, to forward a recommendation of "F-R" District
on the property. Motion passed with Pusley and Mims being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACT TOTALING 195.92
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA C, BY ZONING AS "F~R" FARM-
RURAL DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO
ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING APPLICATION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR NONCONFORMING USE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of the City of Corpus Christi, for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
March 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by zoning the newly annexed tract totaling 195.92 acres, designated as Area
C, known as Nueces County Park No. 1 (Padre Balli Park), located on the east side of
South Padre Island Drive, south of Whitecap Boulevard, 'as a "FR" Farm-Rural District.
A metes and bounds description for Area C, is attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
H:~-EG-DI R~DOYLEDCURTIS'dvlYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~O NEAN NX.ORD~DDC~ZC020203.ANX.A.DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION S. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Chdsti
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
Doyle D(.~urtis
Senior A~sistant City Attorney
H:~.EG-DI R~DOYLEDC URTIS~v~YDOCS~002~P&Zo RD02~ZON EANNX.ORD\DDC~ZC020203.ANX.A. DOC
METES AND BOUNDS
(Padre BalH County Park)
195.92 acres, more or less, out of the Nicolas & Juan lose Balli survey, A-1998, located.south of
and adjacent to County Access Road No. 4, and east of and adjacent to Park Road 22, andmore
particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of .the northeast boundary line of a 37-acre tract
described in Document No. 1998050703, Nueces County, Texas Deed Records and the east
fight-of-way line of existing Park Road 22 (South Padre Island Drive), for a comer in the present
city limit linc as established by Ordinance No. 024694. Dated December 31, 2001, and the
southwest comer of the tract here-in described;
THENCE northerly with the east right-of-way line of said Park Road 22, its curves and its angles
(the same being the present city limit line) to a point on the north right-of-way line of Access
Road No. 4, for a comer in said present city limit line, the northwest comer of Padre Balli
County Park and the northwest comer of this tract;
THENCE easterly with the north right-of-way line of said Access Road No. 4, the present city
limit line, to a point on the 1.37-foot line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of
Padre Island with elevation based on U.S.C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present
city limit line established by Ordinance No. 015415. Dated March 19, 1980, and the northeast
comer of this tract;
THENCE southwesterly with said present city limit, to a point in line with the northeast
boundary line of the afore-mentioned 37-acre tract, for the southeast comer of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly, leaving said present city limit line, with the northeast boundary line of
said 37-acre tract, to a point on the east fight-of-way line of Park Road 22, for the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
C0202-03A
R-'lB
B-2
R-lB
SP
R-lB
GULF OF
MEXICO
· CASE C0202-03A
~ OF COm~JS CHms'rz, TEXAS
AREA C
OR,
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
4~IIE
EXHIBIT A
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACT TOTALING t95.92
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA C, BY ZONING AS "R-tB" ONE-
FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING APPLICATION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR NONCONFORMING USE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council
its reports and recommendations concerning the application of the City of
Corpus Christi, for amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning
Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
March 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by zoning the newly annexed tracts totaling 195.92 acres, designated as Area
C, known as Nueces County Park No. I (Padre Balli Park), located on the east side of
South Padre Island Drive, south of Whitecap Boulevard, as a "R-1 B" One-family
Dwellingl District. A metes and bounds description for Area C, is attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section I of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
H:~LEG-DIR\DOYLEDCU RTIS~.IYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~ZON EANNX.ORD~DDC~C020203.ANX.B.DOC
/O
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Chdsti as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
Doyle D.~'urtis -
Senior A~sistant City Attorney
H :~-EG-DI R\DOYLEDCU RTIS~IYDOCS~002~P&ZORD02~.ON EANNX. ORD~DDC~ZC020203.ANX.B.DOC
/I
METES AND BOUNDS
(Padre Balli County Pa,k)
195.92 acres, more or less, out of the Nicolas & Juan Jose Balli survey, A-1998, located.south of
and adjacent to County Access Road No. 4, and east of and adjacent to Park Road 22, and more
particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT, the intersection of the northeast boundary line of a 37-acre tract
. described in Document No. 1998050703, Nueees County, Texas Deed Records and the east
right-of-way line of existing Park Road 22 (South Padre Island Drive), for a comer in the present
city limit line as established by Ordinance No. 024694. Dated December 31, 2001, and the
southwest comer of the tract here-in described;
THENCE northerly with the east right-of-way line of said Park Road 22, its cUrVes and its angles
(the same being the present city limit line) to a point on the north right-of-way line of Access
Road No. 4, for a comer in said present city limit line, the northwest comer of Padre Balli
CountyPark and the northwest comer of this tract;
THENCE easterly with the north right-of-way line of said Access Road No. 4, the present city
limit line, to a point on the 1.37-foot line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of
Padre Island with elevation based on U.S.C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present
city limit line established by Ordinance No. 015415. Dated March 19, 1980, and the northeast
comer of this tract;
THENCE southwesterly with said present city limit, to a point in line with the northeast
boundary line of the afore-mentioned 37-acre tract, for the southeast comer of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly, leaving said present city limit line, with the northeast boundary line of
said 37-acre tract, to a point on the east right-of-way line of Park Road 22, for the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
C02'02-03A
EXHmIT A
R-lB
B-2
R-lB
SP ~
O~J-
R-lB
GULF OF
MEXICO
OR.
AREA C
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
EXHIBIT A
· '! " ' r
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: April 16, 2002)
Case No. C0202-04A~ City of Corpus Christi: Zone newly annexed areas to an "AT" Apartment
Tourist District on Gulf of Mexico beach fi'ontage, 200 feet wide and 9,618 feet long, located east of Park Road
22, south of Sea Pines Drive.
Planning Commission and Staffs Recommendation (03/13/02): Approval of the "AT" District.
Requested Council Action: Approval of the "AT" Apartment Tourist District and adoption of the attached
ordinance.
Purpose of Request: Appropriate zoning for newly annexed area.
Summary: The subject property, known as Area D is privately and publicly own. From the south boundary line of
Padre Balli County Park for approximate 1,232 feet south, the subject property is owned by the Walters Estate. The
Jones Estate owns the subject property from the south boundary line of the Walters Estate for an approximate
distance of 7,886 feet. From the Jones Estate south boundary line for a distance of 500 feet the subject properW is
own by the General Land Office (GLO). Area D comprises approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of Gulf Beach
frontage, from the south property line of Padre Balli County Park to a point 500 feet south of the south property line
of the Lawrence Jones property. The strip width extends westward from the city limit line on the Gulf of Mexico
shoreline, to a point along the vegetation line, approximately 200 feet west of and generally parallel to the 1.37-foot
line above Mean Sea Level of the Gulf of Mexico shoreline. The subject property is within Nueces and Kleberg
County.
The subject property is located in an area known as Coastal Barrier Resources Area (COBRA). As a designated
COBRA area, Federal loans or grants for development, insurance or emergency relief funds (FEMA) for repairs or
reconstruction are not permitted. Most of the subject property along the shoreline is within the wetlands and has
limited development potential, while the area along the vegetation line has preferred development potential.
The Jones Estate has indicated to staff through memorandum dated November 29, 2001 for staff to proceed with the
annexation of the public beach area adjacent to the Jones property. Within the memorandum it further states "... that
the level of beach cleaning and maintenance...will remain at a minimal level until the development of our adjacent
property takes place." After reviewing the Jones memorandum, staff concurs with the Jones request. (See attached
memo) Kleberg County also agrees that beach cleaning levels should be at minimal levels until the adjacent property
is developed. Staff also agrees that the Walters property be maintained at a minimal level until adjacent property is
developed.
Stafftypically has supported the "AT" District along shoreline areas of the Gulf of Mexico for tourist development.
Notification: On February 25, 2002, a newspaper notice was published in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times legal
section. To date, there have been no comments supporting or opposing the proposed zoning.
Director of Planning
Agenda Memorandum
Case No. C0202-04A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 2
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
1) Zoning Report
2) Planning ConUmssion Minutes
4) Ordinance
Pages
Page
Pages
3-7
8
9-12
H :\PLN-D IR\EILMA\WORD~AGENDM EM\C0202-04AAGENDAMEMO.DOC
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No.:
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
Map No.:
Applicant:
Legal Description/Location:
Proposed Zoning:
Current Use of Property:
Purpose of Request:
C0202-04A
March 13, 2002
D19B, D20A
City of Corpus Christi
Being a 200-foot wide tract of land along the Gulf of Mexico extending 9,618 feet south from the
Padre Balli Park into Kleberg County, located east of Park Road 22 and south of Sea Pines Drive.
Area of Annexation: Area D - 44.16 acres
"AT" Aparlment Tourist District
Undeveloped land.
Appropriate zoning designation on newly
annexed territory.
Adjacent Zoning:
North, South - Out of City limits
East - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District
West - "AT" Apartment- Tourist District and "AT/SP" Apartment-Tourist District with a Special
Permit
Adjacent Land Use:
North - Padre Balli County Park.
South - Undeveloped land.
East Gulf of Mexico.
West Undeveloped land.
Zoning Report
Case No. C0202-04A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 2
Number of Residential Units Allowed:
"AT" -1,923 units (43.56 dwelling unit per acre on 44.16 acres)
Estimated Traffic Generation:
Single-family residences: I 0 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 1,923 dwelling
units = 19,236 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Adiacent Streets/Classification:
a) Not Applicable.
Zoning History of Property:
There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years.
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
In November 2001, 1,281 acres south of Sea Pines Drive and to the east of the Laguna Madre was
annexed and zoned with an "R-1B/SP" for a mixed use development on 754 acres; an "AT/SP" for
a mixed use development on 476 acres and an "AT" District on 51 acres,"
Planning Staff Analysis:
The subject property, known as Area D is privately and publicly own. From the south boundary line
of Padre Balli County Park for approximate 1,232 feet south, the subject property is owned by the
Walters Estate. The Jones Estate owns the subject property from the south boundary line of the
Walters Estate for an approximate distance of 7,886 feet. From the Jones Estate south boundary line
for a distance of 500 feet the subject property is own by the General Land Office (GLO). Area D
comprises approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of Gulf Beach frontage, from the south property
line of Padre Balli County Park to a point 500 feet south of the south property line of the Lawrence
Jones property. The strip width extends westward from the city limit line on the Gulf of Mexico
shoreline, to a point along the vegetation line, approximately 200 feet west of and generally parallel
to the 1.37ofoot line above Mean Sea Level of the Gulf of Mexico shoreline. The subject property
is within Nueces and Kleberg County.
The subject property is located in an area known as Coastal Barrier Resources Area (COBRA). As
a designated COBRA area, Federal loans or grants for development, insurance or emergency relief
funds (FEMA) for repairs or reconstruction are not permitted. Most of the subject property along
the shoreline is within the wetlands and has limited development potential, while the area along the
vegetation line has preferred development potential.
The Jones Estate has indicated to staff through memorandum dated November 29, 2001 for staff to
proceed with the annexation of the public beach area adjacent to the Jones property. Within the
Zoning Report
Case No. C0202-04A (City of Corpus Christi)
Page 3
memorandum it further states "... that the level of beach cleaning and maintenance...will remain at
a minimal level until the development of our adjacent property takes place." After reviewing the
Jones memorandum, staffconcurs with the Jones request. (See attached memo) Kleberg County also
agrees that beach cleaning levels should be at minimal levels until the adjacent property is
developed. Staff also agrees that the Walters property be maintained at a minimal level until adjacent
property is developed.
Staff typically has supported the "AT" District along shoreline areas of the Gulf of Mexico for
tourist development.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval.
Attachments:
Zoning Map
Jones memorandum
H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~ZONRPTS\C0202-04ACCREPORT.DOC
R-lB
O.CJ_
R-lB
/
R'IB
R-lB/
SP
/
/
R-lB
GULF OF
MEXICO
'CASE C0202-04A
ct'ri' oF co~.Pus c~s~'L TEX~
OIL
AREA D
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Del3artment, 08FEBO2/AMF
Attachment I. Property Owner Request for Annexation
2001
1201
Dear
As tl~ owa~rs of t.~ 1,260,f7 ~ ~act of land lo~-__~_ south of ami adjace~ to
thru Nuacea-Iile. ber~ Coual~ Li~ on Padre Island aad ~,~ partimllaziy cles~rJbed as
I'raot 1 of At~.a C in the ~ A~,,~ca~iua l%,~,,~,.al, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
We beI~we ~ tb~ '""""o_~oa o.t' ~ strip of !,-,,~ ~ b~l~ s~ve th~ publlo
i~,~,e~ m~ p~de ~' ~ orderly dm, el .o?~-,~ of riga ~
and as Trustee ~,~t ca b~.!fof
Visia Dd Mar h'xisation Compaay
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
City of Corpus Christi: C0202-04A
REQUEST:
Annex to "AT" Apartment Tourist District on property described as being a 200-foot
wide tract of land along the Gulf of Mexico extending 9,618 feet south from the Padre
Balli Park into Kleberg County, and located east of Park Road 22 and south of Sea Pines
Drive.
Mr. Saldafia provided a slide presemation of the subject property and the surrounding area. He
said that the subject property, known as Area D is privately and publicly own. From the south boundary
line of Padre Balli County Park for approximate 1,232 feet south, the subject property is owned by the
Walters Estate. The lones Estate owns the subject property fi.om the south boundary line of the Waiters
Estate for an approximate distance of 7,886 feet. From the Jones Estate south boundary line for a distance
of 500 feet the subject property is own by the General Land Office (GLO). Area D comprises
approximately 44.16 acres and 9,618 feet of Gulf Beach fi'ontage, fi.om the south property line of Padre
Balli County Park to a point 500 feet south of the south property line of the Lawrence Jones property. The
strip width extends westward fi'om the city limit line on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, to a point along the
vegetation line, approximately 200 feet west of and generally parallel to the 1.37-foot line above Mean Sea
Level of the Gulf of Mexico shoreline. The subject property is within Nueces and Kleberg County.
The subject properly is located in an area known as Coastal Barrier Resources Area (COBRA).
As a designated COBRA area, Federal loans or grants for development, insurance or emergency relief
funds (FEMA) for repairs or reconstruction are not permitted. Most of the subject property along the
shoreline is within the wetlands and has limited development potential, while the area along the vegetation
line has preferred development potential.
The Jones Estate has indicated m staff through memorandum dated November 29, 2001 for staff to
proceed with the annexation of the public beach area adjacent to the Jones property. Within the
memorandum it further states "... that the level of beach cleaning and maintenance...will remain at a
minimal level until the development of our adjacent property takes place." After reviewing the Jones
memorandum, staff concurs with the Jones request. (See attached memo) Kleberg County also agrees that
beach cleaning levels should be at minimal levels until the adjacent property is developed. Staff also agrees
that the Walters property be maintained at a minimal level until adjacent property is developed.
Staff typically has supported the "AT" District along shoreline areas of the Gulf of Mexico for
tourist development and added that the "AT" Apartment-Tourist District is for potential vendors.
Therefore, Staffrecommends approval of the zoning request.
Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public
hearing was closed.
Motion by Smith, seconded by Sween-McGloin, to forward a recommendation of "AT"
Apartment-Tourist District. Motion passed with Mires and Pusley being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO THE NEWLY ANNEXED TRACT TOTALING44.16
ACRES, DESIGNATED AS AREA D, BY ZONING AS "AT"
APARTMENT~OURIST DISTRICT; AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS
FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REQUIRING
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
NONCONFORMING USE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of the City of Corpus Christi, for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
Mamh 13, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION I. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by zoning the newly annexed tract totaling 44.16 acres, designated as Area
D, being a 200-foot wide tract of land along the Gulf of Mexico extending 9,618 feet
south from the Padre Balli Park into Kleberg County, located east of Park Road 22 and
south of Sea Pines Drive, as "AT" Apartment-Tourist District. A metes and bounds
description for Area D, is attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Chdsti,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
H:~LEG-DIR~DOYLEDCU RTIS~IYDOCS~002~&ZO RD02~ZONEANNX.ORD~DDC~ZC020204.ANX.A. DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION $. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. A certificate of occupancy shall be required for every nonconforming use.
An application for a certificate of occupancy for a nonconforming use shall be filed
within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 a.m., April 17, 2002, the
same time that the ordinance annexing this tract of land takes effect.
SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
City Secretary Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
City ~mey~ /~ ~ ~
By: ~::~-~.,~J~/'~..~'~ ~
boyle D~-~j~i~- --
Senior A~stant Ci~ A~orney
H:~LEG-DIR~DOYLEDCU RTIS'~vIYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~ZONEAN NX.ORD'tDDC~ZC020204,ANX.A.DOC
METES AND BOUNDS
(Jones, Walter and GLO Beach Frontages)
44.16 acres, more or less, consisting of a part of an 18.07 acre tract described in Document
No. 840580, Nueces County, Texas, Deed Records, a part of a 37 acre tract described in
Document No. 1998050703, Nueces County, Texas Deed Records, a part of a 1260.57 acre tract
out of the Jose Maria Tovar Subdivision of record in Volume 2, Pages 82 and 83, Kleberg
County, Texas, map records and a portion of beach frontage extending southwest 500 feet, more
or less, from the southwest line of the aforementioned 1260.57 acre tract, said 44.16 acres of
beach frontage, more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING AT A POINT on the vegetation line of the Gulf of Mexico side of Padre Island, a
point which bears southwest, 500 feet from a comer on the present city limit line established by
Ord. No. 024694, dated 12-31-01 (said comer being the point of intersection between the
vegetation line and the southwest line of the aforementioned 1260.57 acre tract) for the
southwest comer of the tract herein described;
TI-IENCE northeasterly with the present city limit line, the vegetation line approximately 200
feet west of and generally parallel to the shoreline of the Gulf of Mexico, to a point on the
northeast line of the aforementioned 37 acre tract, for a comer in the present city limit line and
the northwest comer of this tract;
THENCE southeasterly with the northeast line of said 37 acre tract, to a point on the 1.37 foot
line above mean sea level of the Gulf of Mexico side of Padre Island with elevation based on
U.S;C. and G.S. datum of 1929, for a point on the present city limit line established by Ord. No.
015415, dated 3-19-80 and the northeast comer of this tract;
THENCE southwesterly with said present city limit line, to a point in line with the point of
beginning, for the southeast comer of this tract;
THENCE northwesterly leaving said present city limit line at fight angles thereto, to a point on
the vegetation line, for the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT A
¢0202-04A
/ R-lB
R-lB
R-~B/
SP
O.C.L
R-lB
/
/
R-lB
GULF OF
MEXICO
,C~.~E CO202-04A
c~ oF a3P. pus c~ms'rz, ~
AREA D
OR. 4~0E
City of Corpus Christi, Planning Department, 08FEBO2/AMF
EXt-IIBIT A
28
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: April 16, 2002)
Case No. 0302-01~ Isla Properties: A change of zoning from an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to
an "RE" Residential Estate District on Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 38, south half of
Lot 14, located on the north side of Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 425 feet west of Scarlet Oak Drive.
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation {03/13/02): Approval.
Requested Council Action: Approval of the "RE" Residential Estate District and adoption of the attached
ordinance.
Purpose of Request: To develop single-family residential.
Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to an
"RE" Residential Estate District in order to develop the property with 1-acre residential lots. Development of the
subject property is part of a larger development that includes the ten (10) acres to the north. The total development,
known as Walking Oaks Subdivision, will contain eight, 1-acre lots and two, 4.5 acre lots. The proposed
development will have direct access to Yorktown Boulevard, an arterial. It is estimated that the proposed ten (10)
lots could generate 100 daily trip ends, which will not overburden Yorktown Boulevard. The proposed development
is consistent with the existing developments to the north and east. These adjacent properties are currently zoned an
"RE" District. Approval of the "RE" District would be an expansion of the adjacent "RE" District.
Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Commission and Staff's recommendation.
Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, thirteen (13) notices were mailed to the property owners within
a 200-foot radius, of which one (1) was returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. The 20% rule is
not in effect.
Director Of planning (f
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
l) Zoning Report Pages 2-7
2) Comments Received Page 8
3) Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
4) Ordinance Pages 10-11 ~'iii
H:~P LN -DIR\ERMA\WORD~AGEN DMEM\0302-01 AGENDAM EMO.DOC
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No.:
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
Map No.:
Applicant:
Legal Description/Location:
0302-01
March 13,2002
F17A, F17C
Isla Properties
Flour Bluffand Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 38, south half of Lot 14, located on the
north side of Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 425 feet west of Scarlet Oak Drive.
9.3845 acres
Same as above.
"R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District
"RE" Residential Estate District
Vacant land.
To develop single-family residential.
Not applicable.
Area of Request:
Lot(s) Area:
Current Zoning:
Request:
Current Use of Property:
Purpose of Request:
Zoning Change Requested Due
to Notice of. Violation:
Adjacent Zoning:
North, East - "RE" Residential Estate District
South, West - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District
Ad[aeent Land Use:
North, South, West - Vacant land.
East - Single-family residences.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-01 (Isla Properties)
Page 2
Number of Residential Units Allowed:
"R-1B" - 68 units (7.26 dwelling units per acre)
"RE" - 9 units (1 dwelling unit per acre)
Estimated Traffic Generation:
Single-family residential - 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 9 dwelling units
= 90 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Adiacent Streets/Classification:
a) Yorktown Boulevard - arterial.
Right-of-Way Design
Current:
a) 100-foot right-of-way with a 24-foot wide rural paved section.
Planned:
a) 100-foot right-of-way with a 76-foot back-to-back paved section.
August 2001 Traffic Count {24-hour~ weekday~ non-directional}:
a) 3,799 vehicles per day.
Zonin~ History of Property:
There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years.
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
There has been no rezonlng activity in the area within the past five (5) yeoxs.
Zoning Inventory:
The subject property is part of 1,392.48 acres of land currently zoned an "R-IB" District that is
predominantly used as agricultural land. Adjacent to the north and east, there are149.39 acres of land
zoned an "RE" District that is developed with single-family residences on large lots. Southwest from
the subject property, there is a 0.81 acre tract of land zoned a "B-I" District that is developed with
a bar.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-01 (lsla Properties)
Page 3
Planning Staff Analysis:
General Characteristics and Back~round: The applicant has requested a change of zoning
from an "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to an "RE" Residential Estate District in order
to develop the property with l-acre lots. Development of the subject property is part of a
larger development that includes the ten (10) acres to the north. The total development
known as Walking Oaks Subdivision, will contain 8, 1-acre lots and 2, 4.5 acre lots. The
proposed development will have direct access to Yorktown Boulevard, an arterial. It is
estimated that the proposed ten (10) lots could generate 100 daily trip ends, which will not
overburden Yorktown Boulevard. Large lot development is permitted in the existing "R-lB"
District, except that curbs, gutters and sidewalks would be permitted. It is the developer's
intent to create a rural atmosphere that does not contain the aforementioned improvements.
The proposed development is consistent with the existing developments to the north and east.
These adjacent properties are currently zoned an "RE" District. Approval of the "RE"
District would be an expansion of the adjacent "RE" District.
Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall, the
Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "RE" District. The Flour
Bluff Area Development Plan recommends the area to develop with medium density single-
family development with up to 7 dwelling units per acre. The requested "RE" District is
consistent with the Plan's recommended land use and the proposed district permits one
dwelling unit per acre.
Potential Housing Density: The "R-lB" District permits a density of 7.26 dwelling units per
acre or 68 units on the subject property. The proposed "RE" District permits a density of 1
unit per acre or nine (9) units on the subject property.
Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: The "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of not less than
25 feet and a side and rear yard setback of not less than five (5) feet each. The "RE" District
requires a front yard setback of fifty(50) feet and a side and rear yard setback of 25 feet each.
Buildings in both districts are permitted to have a height of 35 feet, not to exceed three (3)
stories.
Signage: Both, the "RE" and "R-lB" Districts are permitted one wall sign with an area not
to exceed one square foot. Freestanding signs are not permitted.
Traffic: The proposed single-family development that includes the subject property is
estimated to generate approximately 100 daily trip ends. This amount of traffic accessing
an arterial, Yorktown Boulevard, will have minimal effect on the street system.
Parking/Screening: Residential development is required to provide 1.5 off-street parking
spaces for each unit containing one bedroom or two (2) off-street parking spaces for each
unit containing two (2) bedrooms or more. Since the proposed development is for detached
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-01 (Isla Properties)
Page 4
single-family residences, each lot will have to contain at least two (2) off-street parking
spaces. Compliance with the off-street parking regulations will be required during the
permitting phase of the development. Residential development is not required to screen.
Costs to City: All of the infrastructure required to serve the proposed development will be
at the developers expense. No cost to the City is anticipated.
Platting: A proposed replat of the subject property has been reviewed and approved by the
City.
Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.)
a) The requested "RE" District is consistent with the adopted Flour Bluff Area Development
Plan's recommended land use.
b) Approval of the requested "RE" District would allow the subject property to develop as a
rural development.
c) Approval of the requested "RE" District would be an expansion of the "RE" District to the
north and east.
Cons:
a)
Staff Recommendation:
Attachments:
__ (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.)
The existing "R-lB" District is more consistent with the adopted Flour Bluff Area
Development Plan's recommended land use.
Approval.
Zoning and Ownership Map
Ownership List
H:~PLN-DIR\ERMA\WORD~ZONRPTS\0302-01REPORTDOC
B-I
FLOUR
FARM
ENCINAL
TRACT
GOLDEN OAKS
FLOUR BLUFF &
FARM & GARDEN
2
12 2
[]
R-lB
Feb 22, 2002 -AivF'
CASE Z0302-01
RE
R-lB
Subject property
- Property Owner in Favor
Property Owner Opposed
See Comments on Page(s) J ~
Owners within 200 feet liated on attoched ownership list~
OWNERSHIP LIST
CASE NO. 0302-01
Applicant:
Isla Properties
c/o Jim Maixner)
15713 S. Padre Island Dr. 78418
Agent: Voss Engineering, Inc.
c/o Ron Voss, Jr.
3756 Bratton Road
1
Z0302-01 064600000010
MARTIN ROYCE E
2001 YORKTOWN BOULEVARD
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
BERLET ADD LTS 1 & 2
2
Z0302-01 064600000030
JOHNSTON JIMMY B
P O BOX 18279
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
BERLET ADD LT 3
3
Z0302-01 064600000220
HELLMANN JOSEPH J ET UX
DIANE
2015 YORKTOWN BLVD
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
BERLET ADD LTS 22 & 23
4
Z0302-01 247600381400
ISLA PROPERTIES INC
15522 CRUISER # B
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT 20 ACS OUT OF LT 14 SEC 38
5
Z0302-01 247600381500
MARTIN ROBERT R
P O BOX 6902
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT 10 ACS OUT OF E/2 OF LT 15
SEC 38
6
Z0302-01 247600381900
FICHTEL TRINI
1935 YORKTOWlq
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FILM GDN
TRACT 14.3311 ACS OUT OF W POR
LT 19 SEC 38
7
Z0302-01 247600382005
SMITH CAROL SYLVIA
P O BOX 5254
AUSTIN TX 78763
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT LTS 30 & 31 SEC 38, 40 ACS
8
Z0302-01 852500000030
TUCKER BRYAN R
3746 SCARLET OAK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
SUMMER BREEZE ESTATES LT 3
9
Z0302-01 852500000040
WILLMAN E GREGG AND
SUSAN L WILLMAN WFE
433 SKIPPER
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
SUMMER BREEZE ESTATES LT 4
10
Z0302-01 852500000050
GARCIA ROBERT G ET UX
MELISSA
1220 AIRLINE RD #130
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
SUMMER BREEZE ESTATES LT 5
11
Z0302-01 852500000060
GRAY DAVID AND KA1PO D
GRAY WEE
1818 GREEN JAY'S COURT
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
SUMMER BREEZE ESTATES LT 6
12
Z0302-01 852500000110
HATTOY HENRY A AND
SANDRA L HATTOY
1837 SUMMER BREEZE COURT
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
SUMMER BREEZE ESTATES LT S 11
&12
13
Z0302-01
TEXAS DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
1701 S. PADRE ISLAND DR.
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416
SP
Z0302-01 247600381400
ISLA PROPERTIES INC
15713 S. PADRE ISLAND DR.
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT 20 ACS OUT OF LT 14 SEC 38
Z0302-01
SUPERINTENDENT
FLOUR BLUFF I.S.D.
2505 WALDRON ROAD
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78418
Z0302-01
FLOUR BLUFF BUSiNESS ASSN.
P. O. BOX 181423
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78418
Z0302-01
RON VOSS, JR.
VOSS ENGINEERING, INC.
3756 BRATTON ROAD
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78413
COMMENTS RECEIVED
FROM NOTICES MAILED
CASE NO. 0302-01
Isla Properties
· - FAVOR
X - OPPOSED
(Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.)
I. Notices returned from within the 200-foot notification area:
Favor:
5)
Robert R. Martin, P. O. Box 6902 78411
No written comment.
Opposition: None.
II.
Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area:
Favor: None.
Opposition: None.
III.
Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area:
Favor: None.
Opposition: None.
HSPLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD\COMMDATA\0302-01 COMMENTS.DOC
g
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
Isla Properties: 0302-01
REQUEST:
"R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to ,,RE,, Residential Estate District on property
described as Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 38, south half of
Lot 14, located on the north side of Yorktown Boulevard, approximately 425 feet west of
Scarlet Oak Drive.
Mr. Saldafla presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the
surrounding area. He said that the subject property is part of 1,392.48 acres of land currently zoned an "R-
IB'' District that is predominantly used as agricultural land. Adjacent to the north and east, there are
149.39 acres of land zoned an "RE" District that is developed with single-family residences on large lots.
Southwest from the subject property, there is a 0.81 acre tract of land zoned a "B-I" District that is
developed with a bar.
The applicant has requested a change of zoning from an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to
an "RE" Residential Estate District in order to develop the property with l-acre lots. Development of the
subject property is part of a larger development that includes the ten (10) acres to the north. The total
development known as Walking Oaks Subdivision, will contain 8, 1-acre lots and 2, 4.5-acre lots. The
proposed development will have direct access to Yorktown Boulevard, an arterial. It is estimated that the
proposed ten (10) lots could generate 100 daily trip ends, which will not overburden Yorktown Boulevard.
Large lot development is permitted in the existing "R-lB" District, except that curbs, gutters and sidewalks
would be permitted. It isthe developer's intent to create a rural atmosphere that does not contain the
aforementioned improvements. The proposed development is consistent with the existing developments to
the north and east. These adjacent properties are currently zoned an "RE" District. Approval of the "RE"
District would be an expansion of the adjacent "RE" District.
The Flour Bluff Area Development Plan recommends the area to develop with medium density
single-family development with up to seven (7) dwelling units per acre. The requested "RE" District is
consistent with the Plan's recommended land use and the proposed district permits one dwelling unit per
acre.
Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. No one appeared in favor or opposition. Public
hearing was closed.
Motion by Zamora, seconded by Salazar, to forward a recommendation for approval of the
rezoning request. Motion passed with Pusley and Mires being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY ISLA
PROPERTIES, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO
LOT '14, SECTION 38, FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND
GARDEN TRACTS, FROM "R-I B" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT
TO "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT; AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS
FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its repOrts and
recommendations concerning the application of Isla Properties for amendment to the of
the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
March 13, 2002 dudng a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by changing the zoning on Lot 14, Section 38, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm
and Garden Tracts, located on the north side of Yorktown Boulevard, from "R-1B" One-
family District to "RE" Residential Estate District.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and ZOning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
~J-EGAL~-AW``LEG-D~R~D~y~eDcurtisW~YD~cS~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~n~ng~rd~D~YLE~2~s~aPr~p~e~ties~Z~3~2~1A~rd~d~c
/O
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April, 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
City P~ey
Doyle D~urtis
Senior A§sistant City Attorney
~EGAL~-AV~ALEG~D~R~D~y~eDcurt~s~YD~cS~2~P&Z~RD~2~Z~ning~rd~D~YLE~2~s~aPr~p~erties~Z~3~2~1A"~rd~d~c
/I
29
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: April 16, 2002)
Case No. 0302-02~ Oceanic Development~ Ltd.: A change of zoning from an "R-lA" One-family
Dwelling District and "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-4" General Business District on Tract 1 and
"A-I" Apartment House District on Tract 2, on Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 28,
being 6.5 acres out of Lots I and 2, located on the north side of South Padre Island Drive, approximately 450 feet
east of Rodd Field Road.
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (03/13/02): Approval.
Requested Council Action: Approval of the "B-4' General Business District on Tract 1 and "A-I"
Apartment House District on Tract 2 and adoption of the attached ordinance.
Purpose of Request: To develop a retail center and multi-family residential.
Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning on Tract 1 from "R-lA" One-family Dwelling District
to a "B-4" General Business District in order to develop the subject property with a retail establishment. On Tract 2
the applicant has requested a change of zoning from "R-1A" District and an "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to
an "A-I" Apartment House District to expand the existing 2-story apartment complex west of Tract 2. Tract 1
contains 1.2 acres and Tract 2 is 5.3 acres. Access to Tracts l and 2 is provided along the frontage road of South
Padre Island Drive, an expressway. Tract 2 has additional access along McArdle Road, a collector street. Approval
of the requested "B-4" District of Tract I would be an expansion on the adjacent "B-4" District to the east. Approval
of the requested "A-I" District on Tract 2 would be an expansion of the adjacent "A-I" District to the nox~rh, east
and west, and compatible with the townhouse development to the north, across McArdle Road, that is zoned "R-2"
Multiple Dwelling District.
Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning ComnUssion and Stall's recommendation.
Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, seventy-four (74) notices were mailed to the property owners
within a 200-foot radius, of which one (1) was returned in favor and foray-five (45) were returned in opposition.
The owner of the subject property submitted a notice in favor. The 20¥0 rule is not in effect.
Director of Planmng
MG/MS/er
Attachments:
1) Zoning Report Pages 2-20
2) Comments Received Pages 21-25
3) Planning Commission Minutes Pages 26-27
4) Ordinance Pages 28-31
H:~P LN-DIR\ERM A\WOKD~AGENDM EM\0302-02AGENDAMEMO.DOC
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No.:
Planning Commission
Hearing Date:
Map No.:
Applicant:
Legal Description/Location:
0302-02
March 13, 2002
H17C
Oceanic Development, LTD.
Flour Bluffand Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 28, being 6.5 acres out of Lots 1 and 2,
located on the north side of South Padre Island Drive, approximately 450 feet east of Rodd Field
Road.
Area of Request:
Lot(s) Area:
Current Zoning:
Request:
6.5 acres
Same as above.
"R-lA" One-family Dwelling District and
"R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District
Tract 1-"B-4" General Business District
Tract 2 - "A-I" Apartment House District
Undeveloped.
Retail center and multi-family residential.
Not applicable.
Current Use of Property:
Purpose of Request:
Zoning Change Requested Due
to Notice of Violation:
Adiacent Zoning:
North -"A-I" Apartment House District and (across McArdle Road) "R-1A/SP" One-family
Dwelling District and "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District.
South - "B-4" General Business District and (across South Padre Island Drive) "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District.
East - "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District, "A-1" Apartment House District and "B-4" General
Business District.
West - "R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 2
Ad,iacent Land Use:
North - Undeveloped land and (across McArdle Road) townhouses.
South - Undeveloped land and (across South Padre Island Drive) Undeveloped land.
East - Coffee/Bar Shop and undeveloped land.
West - Apartment complex.
Number of Residential Units Allowed:
"R-IA" and "R-lB" - 47.19 units (7.26 dwelling units per acre) -Tract 1 and 2.
"A-1" -115 units (21.78 dwelling units per acre) - Tract 2.
"B-4" -43 units (36.30 dwelling units per acre) - Tract 1.
Estimated Traffic Generation:
Specialty retail center - 40.67 average weekday vehicle lxip ends per 1,000 square feet of gross floor
area (A.M. Peak Hour) x 10,596 square feet of gross floor area (average floor area per ITE Manual)
= 431 average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Apartment complex ~ 6.47 average weekday trip ends per dwelling unit x 115 dwelling units = 745
average weekday vehicle trip ends.
Adiacent Streets/Classification:
a)
b)
South Padre Island Drive - expressway
McArdle - collector
Right-of-Way Design
Current:
a)
b)
Variable right-of-way and pavement width.
60-foot right-of-way with a 28-foot wide rural paved section.
Planned:
a)
b)
Same as current.
70-foot right-of-way with a 48-foot back-to-back paved section.
.Traffic Count (24-hour~ weekday~ non-directional):
a)
b)
14,269 vehicles per day (at South Padre Island Drive and Rodd Field Road).
None available.
Zoning History of Property:
There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic DeveLopment, Ltd.)
Page 3
Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases:
In February 2000, the property on the northwest comer of South Padre Island Drive and Ennis JoslIn
Road, located east of the subject property, was granted a change of zoning from "R-1B" District to
a "B-4" District for a fast food and convenience store.
In December 1996, Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, located on the north side of South Padre Island Drive and on
the east side of Ennis Joslin Road and east of the subject property, were granted a change of zoning
from "R-lB" District to "A-2" District on Lot 2 for apartments and "B-4" District on Lots 3, 4 and
5 for commercial development.
Zoning Inventory:
Tract 1 is a remaining "R-lA" District property with adjacency to approximately six (6) acres of land
to the east that is zoned with a "B-4" District having frontage along the access road of South Padre
Island Drive. The majority of the six (6) acre area is develop commercially with approximately one
(1) acre remaining undeveloped. West of Tract 1 is approximately 6.5 acres of "A-I" District
property developed as an apartment complex.. North of Tract 1 is an undeveloped area zoned with
an "A-i" District. South of Tract 1, across South Padre Island Drive, is approximately 78 acres of
undeveloped "R-lB" District property. At the southeast comer of South Padre Island Drive access
road and Rodd Field Road is two (2) acres of"B-4" District property developed as a convenience
store. East of Tract 2 is an undeveloped area consisting of approximately eight (8) acres that is zoned
a "R-1B" District and a one and one-half (1.5) acre area that is zoned an "A-1" District that remains
undeveloped. West of Tract 2 is an "A-I" District property that is developed with an apartment
complex. North of Tract 2, across McArdle Road, is "R-2" District property developed as
townhouses. South of Tract 2 is undeveloped "B-4" District property.
Planning Staff Analysis:
General Characteristics and Background: The applicant has requested a change of zoning on
Tract 1 from "R-lA" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-4" General Business District in
order to develop the subject property with a retail establishment. The applicant's
representative has indicated to staff that a sale is pending for Tract 1 subject to a change of
zoning being approved. Once the purchase of the 1.2-acre property takes place the applicant
plans to seek a retail user for the property. The majority of the "B-4" District property east
of Tract 1 is developed with a variety of uses including coffee/bar shop, auto rentals and boat
sales. A six (6) foot-screening fence would be required along the north and west boundary
of the tract since residential adjacency exists. Tract 1 has access from the South Padre Island
Drive, an expressway, with a fi'ontage road. Approval of the requested "B4" District would
be an expansion on the adjacent "B-4" District to the east.
A pending sale of Tract 2 is subject to a change of zoning from "R-lA" District and "R-lB"
One-family Dwelling District to an "A-I" Apartment House District. Tract 2 is a 5.3 acre
area that is east of an existing "A-I" District property that is developed as an apartment
complex and is owned by the applicant. Subject to the change of zoning, the applicant plans
to expand the existing 2-story apartment complex onto Tract 2 and on an one (1) acre area
north of Tract 2 that is owned by the applicant and zoned with an "A-I" District. The "A-I"
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 4
District has a density of 21.78 units per acre or possible 115 units on Tract 2, or 137 units
on Tract 2 including the adjacent one (1) acre "A-I" District property to the north. As part
of the adjacent apartment complex expansion, Tract 2 could have access from the frontage
road of South Padre Island expressway and along McArdle Road, a collector to the north.
Access to the property will not traverse a residential area. Property across McArdle Road,
north of Tract 2, is develop as townhouses that are classified as multi-family uses. Approval
of the requested "A-1" District would be an expansion of the adjacent "A-1" District to the
north, east and west, and compatible with the townhouse development to the north, across
McArdle Road, that is zoned "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District.
Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall, the
Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "B-4" District on Tract 1
and "A- 1" District on Tract 2. The Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land
use map recommends the area to develop with general commercial uses along South Padre
Island Drive frontage road. Residential development is supported along the areas south of
McArdle Road near Rodd Field Road. The requested "A-I" and "B-4" Districts and
proposed uses are consistent with the Plan's recommended land use.
Potential Housing Density: "R-1A" and "R-lB" Districts permits a density of 7.26 dwelling
units per acre or 47 units on Tract 1 and 2. The "A-I" District allows 21.78 units per acre
or 115 units on Tract 2. The "B-4" District permits a density of 36.30 dwelling units per acre
or 43 units on Tract 1. With direct access to an arterial and an expressway, the increased in
density will not adversely affect the surrounding area.
Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: "R-IA" and "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of 25
feet with a side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet each. The "A-I" District requires a front
yard setback of twenty (20) feet with a side and rear yard of five (5) feet for single-family
and duplex uses. Multi-family uses, (3 or more units), are to maintain a twenty (20) foot
front yard setback and a rear and side setback often (10) feet for a one-story unit, plus an
additional five (5) feet for each story over one, bm not to exceed 25 feet. The "B4" District
requires a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet with no side or rear yard setback, unless
adjacent to a residential district where a setback often (10) feet would be required. Since
Tract I abuts a residential district along its north and west boundaries, a setback often (10)
feet will be required along the prescribed boundary lines. Buildings in "R-lA" and "R-lB"
Districts are limited to 35 feet in height not to exceed three (3) stories. The "A-I" District
is limited to 45 feet in height not to exceed (3) stories. There are no building height
limitations in the "B-4" District.
Signage: Signs in the "R-IA" and "R-lB" Districts are limited to one wall sign not to exceed
an area of one square foot. Signs in the "A-I" District with more than 100 feet of frontage,
are permitted either one (1) wall sign with an area of forty (40) square feet or one (1)
freestanding sign with a sign area of forty (40) square feet and a height often (10) feet. The
"B-4" District permits unlimited wall and freestanding signs when located behind the front
yard setback. Freestanding signs within the front yard setback are limited to one sign per
street frontage with an area of forty (40) square feet and a height of 25 feet.
Zoning Report
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 5
Traffic: A retail center on Tract 1 would generate approximately 431 average weekday
vehicle trip ends. Traffic would access the frontage road of the expressway, South Padre
Island Drive, which carries 14,269 vehicles per day, at the Rodd Field intersection. An
expansion of the apartment complex onto Tract 2 would generate an additional 745 average
weekday vehicle trip ends. Access to the property could be provided from McArdle Road
that is designated as a collector roadway or through the adjoining apartment complex that has
access along the South Padre Island Drive frontage road. Thus, the potential increase in
traffic would not adversely impact the area.
Parking/Screening: A retail center on Tract 1 is required to provide off-street parking space
for each 200 square feet of floor area. A 10,596 square foot building is required to provide
at least fifty-three (53) parking spaces. The proposed apartment complex on Tract 2 is
required to provide approximately 230 parking spaces at a ratio of two (2) parking spaces per
two (2) bedroom unit. Compliance with the parking regulations will be required during the
permitting phase. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet is
required when a business or industrial use locates adjacent to a residential district. Since
Tract 1 has residential adjacency, a screening fence will be required along the north and west
property line.
Costs to City: Water and wastewater services are available to serve the needs of the subject
property
· Platting: Tracts 1 and 2 are unplatted and will require platting.
Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.)
a) Tract 1 has direct access to an expressway and Tract 2 a collector.
b)
The requested "A-I" and "B-4" Districts would be an extension of the adjacent "A-I" and
"B-4" Districts to the north, east and west.
c)
The requested "A-I" and "B-4" Districts are consistent with the adopted Southeast Area
Development Plan's recommended land use.
Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.)
a) None.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval.
Attachments:
Zoning and Ownership Map
Ownership List
HSPLN-DIR~EKMA\WORD~ZONRPTS\0302-02CCREPORT.DOC
B-4 R-IA R-lB
R-IB/SP
PARK
TOV/tHOMES
R-IA
A-I
ROCK CREEK
TOWNHOUSES
A-I
1
T-lB
I N TRACT
R-lB
A
JOSL IN TRACT
R-lB
Mar 5. 2002 -- AMF'
50
CASE Z0302-02
· - Property Owner in Favor
X Property Owner Opposed
See Comments on Page(s)
Subject property
Owners within 200 feet listed on attached ownership list
Applicant: Oceanic Development, Ltd.
c/o Willard H. Hammonds, II
4418 Ocean Dr. 78412
1
Z0302-02 247600280019
OSHMAN INVESTMENTS LTD
4350 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT NE 1 AC OF E/2 OF LT 1 SEC
28
OWNERSHIP LIST
CASE NO. 0302-02
1
Z0302-02 247600280020
OSHMAN INVESTMENTS LTD
4350 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT 5 ACS OUT OF W/2 OF W/2
OF LT 2 SEC 28
2
Z0302-02 247600280131
SMITH ROY TRUSTEE
LENORA MAE SMITH TRUST
P O BOX 8149
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78468
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT 27.999 ACS OUT LTS 15 & 16
SEC 28
3
Z0302-02 383000010020
OCEAN HARBOR
4418 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
JOSLIN TRACT LT 1-A& 2 BK A
4
Z0302-02 383000010040
WILLIAMS DERREST NEWTON
7034 HATHOR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
JOSLIN TRACT LT 4-A BK A
5
Z0302-02 383000010045
TINOCO AMALIA &
C E PONISH
5217 GREENBRIAR DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413
JOSLIN TRACT LT 4-B & SW .51 AC
OUT OF LT 5-DR BK A
6
Z0302-02 383000010054
lAY JENNIE LEE
7330 S PADRE IS
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
JOSLIN TRACT LT 5-C BK A
7
Z0302-02 383000010055
JEHOVAHS WITNESS
7333 McARDLE ROAD
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
JOSLIN TRACT LT 5-E BK A
7
Z0302-02 383000010056
JEHOVAHS WITNESS
7333 McARDLE ROAD
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78412
JOSLIN TRACT LT 5-DR BK A
8C
Z0302-02 130500010560
HALLIBURTON PATRICIA
56 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHOUSES UT Q 1
56 & UNDIV .8475 1NT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010370
SMITH PATSY S
37 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T37 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010420
GRANTHAM PIESLEY ETUX
JACQLrELINE
2976 JAPONICA
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78410
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
S42 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010720
TRAGER MARY JOYCE
AKA MARY JOYCE JAQUAY
72 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N72 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010810
SPROTI JOEL RANDAL
PO BOX 981054
HOUSTON TX 77098
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M81& UND1V .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010860
PHAM MARY E
13749 HILLWOOD TRAIL
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78410
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
L86 & UND1V .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceamc Development, Ltd.)
Page 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500020980
HALLIBURTON PATRICIA &
TROY SCOTT HALLIBURTON
112 GEORGIA PLACE
PORTLAND TX 78374
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT F 98 &
UNDIV .8475 1NT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021090
TREVINO CHARLES ETUX MICA
109 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT H 109 &
UNDIV .8475 1NT 1N COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021110
ASKEY LLOYD AND
FLORENCE ASKEY
111 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411
CARRIAGE PK TWNItSE UNIT H111
& UNDIV .8475 1NT IN COMM ELE
BK2
8C
Z0302-02 130500010320
SAMII MARK A E~IX JEANNE
16027 ENCINO VIE JO
SAN ANTONIO TX 78232
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T32 & UNDIV .8475 1NT COMMON
ELE BK I
8C
Z0302-02 130500010640
BARNARD DAVID W ET UX
JANE E
7202 MCARDLE RD #64
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
064 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010070
ANZALDUA PETER N ETUX NAN
7 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
Y7 & UNI)IV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK I
8C
Z0302~02 130500010740
HILL R PUTNAM ET UX LUCY
BOX 8130
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78468
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N74 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500021010
REILLY BERNEICE H
101 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT F 101 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500010730
lIARWELL NANCY C
73 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N73 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
7_,0302-02 130500010340
HERZOG JACK AND
MERLE HERZOG
34 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T34 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK I
8C
Z0302-02 130500010670
BURRIOLA VALENT1NO JR ETU
KENRETTA J
67 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
067 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500021020
JOHNSON JUDITH ANN
102 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT F 102 &
UND1V .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500010750
PENNINGTON LEABURN O AND
MARIE PENNINGTON
75 TOWN'HOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRAGE PK TOWNE HOUSES N 75
LrND 1.042 INT COM ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010280
CAPPS FREDERICK M ETUX TH
28 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
U28 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM
ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010780
BETTS ELIZABETH H
Unset
78 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M78& UND1V .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceamc Development, Ltd.)
Page 3
8C
Z0302-02 130500010840
ROBINSON IRIS
84 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M84 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN
COMMON ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010870
MEERD1NK GLORIA DIANE OLI
PO BOX 644
OURAY CO 81427
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
L87 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010940
SMITH JAMES H AND
JIMMIE LIVING TRUST
94 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
K94 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010950
WILLIAMS IRENE M
111 NATIVE OAK
INGRAM TX 78025
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
K95 & UNDIV .8475 1NT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010960
GADELL MICHAEL L ETUX
DIANE B
96 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
K96 & LrNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500021150
RICHARDSON KRIS L AND
RUBY SALAZAR-RICHARDSON
115 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT J 115 &
UND1V .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500010040
NELSON BETTIE R TRUSTEE
NELSON FAMILY REVOC. LVG.
4 TOWN HOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE LIN
Z4 UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON ELE
BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010180
MICHAUD DARLY L ETUX DONN
18 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
W18 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK t
8C
Z0302-02 130500010690
SASSMAN JOE M ETUX FAY R
69 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N69 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500020970
WILSON EUGENE AUSTIN TRUS
97 TOWNSHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UNIT F97 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500010470
INMOBILIARIA MACREEL S.A.
SANCTORUM NO 86 A
COL. NUEVA ARGENTINA
MEXICO,D.F. CP 11230
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R47
UND .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010480
NANCE FRANK N ETUX MARGAR
TRS OF NANCE FAMILY TRUST
48 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R48
UND .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010530
MORRISON LINDA K,
53 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRAIGE PK TWNHOUSES UT Q 2
53 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010010
HUTCHINSON ROSA S
#1 THOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UN
Z1 UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON ELE
BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010020
ETHERIDGE JOHN M ETUX
FRANCES M ETHERIDGE
7202 McARDLE RD APT 2-Z
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UN
Z2 UNDIV .8475 1NT COMMON ELE
BK 1
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 4
8C
Z0302-02 130500010030
OFFUTT ELIZABETH W
#3 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UN
Z3 UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON ELE
BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010050
RAWLINGS NELLIE B
#5 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UN
Z5 UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON ELE
BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010080
LORD SONJA E
#8 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
Y8 & UNDIV .8475 IlqT COMMON
ELE BK I
8C
Z0302-02 130500010100
KELLY MAENELL ORIGINAL TR
MAENELL KELLY LIVING TRUS
10 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
Y10 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010110 '
BASKIN CHARLES L ETUX
11 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHILISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UN
X11 UNDIV .8475 1NT COMMON ELE
BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010120
DENNIS DAVID L TRUSTEE OF
THE DRB TRUST DATED 8-27-
3435 HALLIDAY
SAINTLOUIS MO 63118
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE LIN
X12 UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON ELE
BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010130
CORDER LINDA JANE
13 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HSE UNIT X
13 UNDIV .8475 INT COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010140
MORRISON MARJORIE M
14 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HSE UNIT X
14 UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010150
ASHFORD JACK A
15 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
W15 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010160
GARTLEY JAMES R ETUX
SHARON KAY GARTLEY
16 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOW'NE HOUSE UNIT
W16 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010170
PAINTER G BRIAN
#~7 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
WI7 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010190
ROSS MONA
19 TOWNE HOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
W19 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010200
BELL JULIA BURTON
20 TOWNttOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
W20 & UNDIV .8475 [NT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010220
GERSMANN IB MICHAEL ETUX
ERLA L
22 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
V22 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK I
8C
Z0302-02 130500010230
FADDEN CHARLES J & LOUISE
M FADDEN WFE
23 TOWN HOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
V23 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
I!
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 5
8C
Z0302-02 130500010240
LANGE GARLAND D ETUX BETT
7202 MC ARDLE RD
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
V24 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010260
BARTLETT NELL TRIBBLE
4126 HARRY
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
U26 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM
ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010270
MARCY LOUISE M
27 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
U27 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM
ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010290
KNIGHT RONALD REDELL ETUX
MARILYN KNIGHT
29 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UT U
29 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010300
NORMAN LILLIAN F
30 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
U30 & UNDIV .8475 IN COMMON
ELE BLK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010310
MOORE RILEY E ETUX WINIFR
CO-TRST OF MOORE TRUST
31 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T31 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010330
LAMBERT DORA LEE
33 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T33 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010350
SMITH GRETCHEN B
35 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T35 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMlvlON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010360
DOTY IVY L & LUCYLE Y DOT
TRUST AGREEMENT DATED 6-1
36 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
T36 & UNDIV .8475 1NT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010380
SHAW EDWARD $
38 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOW-NE HOUSE UNIT
S38 & LrNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK
1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010390
LAFEBER E JEANNE
39 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE
UNITS S39 UNDIV .8475 COMM
ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010400
BLANTON ROY L JR. ET UX
40 TOWNE HOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
40 S UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302~02 130500010410
SWEATT LURA DUNN
41 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
S41 UND .8475 0/0 INT IN COM EL
8C
Z0302-02 130500010430
CHRISTENA JEAN E
43 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
S43 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010440
TILLEY A D
44 TOWNE HOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
S44 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK I
ti,
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 6
8C
Z0302-02 130500010450
ZIMMER.MAN JE & MAURINE A
ZIMMERMAN FAMILY LVG TRUS
45 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R45
UND .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK I
8C
Z0302-02 130500010460
WILKERSON RODNEY ET UX
46 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R46
UND .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010490
NICOL DOUGLAS W ET UX
49 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R49
UND .8475 INT 1N COMM ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010500
BOYD W MONTE
#50 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R50
UND .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010510
HAMILTON FAMILY LIVING TR
51 TOW3IHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSE UN R51
UND .8475 INT 1N COMM ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010520
ZINK GARY M ETUX VIRGINIA
52 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRAIGE PK TWIN-HOUSES UT Q 2
52 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010540
HAMIS, ICK BILL
D/B/A B.A. HAMRICK
54 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRAIGE PK TWNHOUSES UT Q 2
54 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010550
HOCH CHARLES FRANCIS JR E
55 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRAIGE PK TWNHOUSES UT Q 2
55 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010570
KOLLAJA MAY JEANETTE
57 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415
CARRAIGE PK TWNItOUSES UT Q 1
57 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010580
DORAN LETHA M
58 TOWNI-IOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413
CARRakIGE PK TWNHOUSES UT Q 1
58 & UNDIV .8475 INT iN COMM ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010600
PENNINGTON GERALD E ETUX
LINDA K
60 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78414
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT P
60 & [YNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010620
COULSON DOLLY JO
#62 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
P62 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010630
STEWART WINIFRED S
63 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
O63 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010660
MOELLER EDWARD H ET UX
EVE
66 TOWN HOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES LrNIT
066 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010680
ZITZO FRANK T ETUX
ELIZABETH C ZITZO
68 TOWNItOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
068 & UNDIV .8475 ENT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010700
WRIGHT JAMES R ET UX
70 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N70 UNDW .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010710
HIX GASTON W ET UX
71 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N71 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010760
AUFORTH MARY ANN
#76 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
N76 UNDIV .8475 COMM ELEM BK 1
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 7
8C
Z0302-02 130500010770
DURHAM RICHARD S
77 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M77 & UND1V .8475 1NT IN
COMMON ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010800
SIMPKINS CLARA
80 TOWNE HOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
MS0 & UNDIV .8475 INT COM
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010820
SHANNON K B
82 TOWNE HOUSE LN
coRPus CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M82 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN
COMMON ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010830
GARCIA LUCINDA J
83 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M83 & UNDIV .8475 INT COM
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010880
GREE LOIS JANE
88 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
L88 & UNDIV .8475 INT 1N COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010890
PONTON KENNETH A ET UX
89 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
L89 & UNDIV .8475 INT COM
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010900
SMITH GERALD E AND
BARBARA J SMITH
90 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
L90 & UND1V .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010930
HERD PATRICIA P
% KATHRYN T PARKER
93 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
K93 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500020990
LINGENFELDER JOHN &
MARGARIT L1NGENFELDER
99 TOWNHOUSE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT F 99 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021000
CROWELL CLIFFORD G ET UX
100 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE LIT F 100 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021030
SAMMAN WILLIAM D
103 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT G 103 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021040
RAY BURRIS M III
104 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT G 104 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021050
DEADMAN PATRICIA
105 TOWNHOUSE LN
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UTG 105 &
LrlqD1V .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021060
KNIGHT OTTO G ETUX MARY F
106 TOWNItOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UNIT Gl06
& UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021070
SCHROT ROBERT G AND
MARGARET JEAN SCHROT
107 TOWNItOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UNIT Gl07
& UND1V .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
BK 2
I [ ' 1
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceamc Development, Ltd.)
Page 8
8C
Z0302-02 130500021080
COTrON CECIL A & NAOMI A
COTTON FAMILY LOVING TRUS
108 TOWN HOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT H 108 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021100
LEE MACK E ETLrX VICTORIA
110 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT H 110 &
UNDIV .8475 1NT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021120
CARLISLE CLYDE E ET UX
112 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UNIT H112
& UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE
BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021130
WEST JACK M ETUX FRANCES
113 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UN1T J113 &
UNDIV .8475 Ii,IT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021140
LA GRONE JAMES ET UX
70 ROCKCREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UTJ 114 &
UNDIV .8475 1NT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021160
TWIJNSTRA WILLIAM
116 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UT J 116 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500021180
MACKLER RALPH H ETUX
MARY LOU MACKLER
ONE ROCK CREEK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE UNIT J118 &
UNDIV .8475 PERCENT INT IN CE
BLK 2
8C
Z0302-02 130500010060
CONOLLY SIDNEY M MD
3535 SANTA FE ST g41
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
Y6 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK I
8C
Z0302-02 130500010090
ANDERSON ALETHA DAVIS GUI
9 TOWN HOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
Y9 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010210
HOOD ETHEL
21 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
V21 & UNI)IV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010250
STILL JAMES C SR ETUX RET
#25 CARRIAGE TOWNHOUSE LA
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
V25 & UNDIV .8475 INT COMMON
ELE BK 1
8C
Z0302-02 130500010590
INGRUM DOLORES J
59 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
P59 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010610
TEEL VIOLA I
61 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHR/STI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
P61 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010650
BOHANEK LAVON
65 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
065 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010790
SCHIEFFER PATRICIA MARY
79 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
M79 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN
COMMON ELEMENTS
8C
Z0302-02 130500010850
TRADER GEORGE ETUX NELL
85 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
L85 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEM
8C
Z0302-02 130500010910
CALDCLEUGH MARY F
91 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TOWNE HOUSE UNIT
Kgl & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM
ELE
8C
Z0302-02 130500010920
LOVE PEGGY
92 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWN HOUSES UNIT
K92 & UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMMON
ELEMENTS /~
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 9
8C
Z0302-02 130500021170
TISOVIC ALBERT J
117 TOWNHOUSE LANE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
CARRIAGE PK TWNHSE LIT J 117 &
UNDIV .8475 INT IN COMM ELE BK 2
9C
Z0302-02 744500020280
NEWLIN C E JR ETUX MARGAR
28 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
[INIT 28 BLD G & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020300
NADALIN FAMILY TRUST
30 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 30 BLD G & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020310
?ETEREK MARION E
31 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CIIRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 31 BLD H & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020320
ARKWRIGHT JOHN L ET UX
32 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 32 BLD H & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500Q20390
TALCOTT FREEDIE S ETAL
39 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UN1T 39 BLD J AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020400
TAYLOR DORIS S
40 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 40 BKD J AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020460
GROSSMAN ROBERT B & IRMA
46 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 46 BLD K AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030520
DE GUERRERO CARMEN J ET A
52 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 52 BLD M AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030590
VAUGHN DOROTHY M
59 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418
ROCK CREEK TOWNI-IOUSES COND
UNIT 59 BLD O AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010070
HUFF HUBERT L
11 RIVIERA DR
ROCKPORT TX 78382
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 7 BLD B AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020370
AMAYA KAFAEL ET UX
FAKALLON 161
COL OEDREGAL DE SAN ANGEL
MEXICO, D. F. 09100
MEXICO
ROCK CREEK TOWNI-IOUSES COND
UNIT 37 BKD I & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020490
SPANUTIUS FAMILY PROPERTI
505 CORAL
CORPUS CHI~ISTI TX 78411
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 49 BLD L AND 1/66 INT 1N
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030550
BARRERA RICARDO O
55 ROCK CREEK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 55 BLD N AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020250
W1LLIAMSON DEBORAH ANN
25 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 25 BLD F & 1/66 INT COM ELM
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 10
9C
Z0302-02 744500030640
HUMPHRIES BEN R ETUX PATS
64 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWN'HOUSES CONE)
UNIT 64 BLD P AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030690
LESHIN JULIUS & PEARLIE C
LESHIN LIVING TRUST
69 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 69 BLD R AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020470
LIEDEKER MORRIS JR
P O BOX 81039
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78468
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES CONE)
UNIT 47 BLD L AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020270
RUSHING JOHN C ETXU OLA C
27 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 27 BLD F & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020420
STONEMAN OLGA PETERSON
42 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS C-ItRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 42 BLD J AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020480
MARTINDALE LELA SANDLIN
48 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOV~NHOUSES COND
UNIT 48 BLD L AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010090
EULENFELD PAMELA A CO-TR
TESTMNTRY TR/u A C KIEL W
P O BOX 243
THORN]DALE TX 76577
ROCK CREEK TOW]WttOUSES COND
UNIT 9 BLD C AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030570
WILKERSON WALLACE R
57 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 57 BLD N AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010040
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA
SUCCESSOR TO BANK UNITED
3200 SOUTH',rEST FREEWAY PT
HOUSTON TX 77027
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 4 BKD A AND 1/66 INT 1N
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010100
GREENE MARGARET M TRUSTEE
THOMAS J GREENE TRUST
418 CAPE LOOKOUT DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWN'HOUSES COND
UNIT 10 BLD C AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010110
ROBERTS THOMAS I ETUX
MARION ADELAIDE ROBERTS
3202 DOW CIR
DEERPARK TX 77536
ROCK CREEK TOWi',R-IOUSES COND
UNIT 11 BLD D AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030650
JONES BARBARA JEAN
28923 SAN SOLARIE
MISSION V1EJO CA 92692
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 65 BLD P AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
7_,0302-02 744500030670
ELMORE VERNON O & PEGGY F
ELMORE FAMILY TRUST
67 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNItOUSES COND
UNIT 67 BLD Q AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010010
MACKLER RALPH H ETUX
MARY LOU MACKLER
ONE ROCK CREEK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 1 BLD A AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010020
SPENCER ROY W ETUX MARTHA
#2 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNI-IOUSES COND
UNIT 2 BLD A AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 1 l
9C
Z0302-02 744500010030
URBAN NORMA RHODES
#3 ROCK CREEK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 3 BLD A AND 1/66 1NT 1N
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010050
LANGDON INGRID
5 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 5 BLD B AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010060
HERBERT FREDRICK JOSEPH
NO 6 ROCK CREEK BLDG B
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 6 BLD B AND 1/66 INT 1N
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010080
TUCKER THOMAS JOSEPH ETUX
JACQUELYN
8 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 8 BLD C AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010120
HOSK1NS ROSEANNE
12 ROCKCREEK RD
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 12 BLD D AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010130
MAYO VIRGINIA
13 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 13 BLD D AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010140
BROWNSTEIN J R ET UX
14 ROCKCREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 14 BLD D AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010150
HAMMERICK JOHN MARTIN ET
15 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 15 BLD E AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010160
PEEVEY NATHAN B & DORIS S
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
#16 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 16 BLD E AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010170
LILES V E AND ANN S
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
17 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 17 BLD E AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500010180
GUSTAFSON A W ET UX
18 ROCKCREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 18 BLD E AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020240
MCJUNKIN LEON C ETUX ALEX
224 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 24 BLD F 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020260
PITTMAN DOROTHY L
26 ROCK CKEEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNI-IOUSES COND
UNIT 26 BLD F & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 74~500020290
SHACKELFORD ROBERT H JR E
FANCHONE N SHACKELFORD
29 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 29 BLD G & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020330
BARTON PATTEE C
33 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 33 BLD H & 1/66 INT COM ELM
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 12
9C
Z0302-02 744500020340
SHOEMAKER LORINE M
#34 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 34 BLD H & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020350
DIEDRICHS ADELE M
#35 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 35 BLD I & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020360
KEELING MAUDE W
36 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 36 BK I & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020380
PONTON JACK R
38 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 38 BLD I & 1/66 INT COM ELM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020410
SCHIEFFER JENNIFER LEE
41 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 41 BLD J AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020430
GRAFFORD JEANNE ANNE
43 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 43 BLD K AND 1/66 INT 1N
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020440
CROSS WILTON RAY AND
BETTY D CROSS
44 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 44 BLD K AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020450
KELL HELEN L
45 ROCK CREEK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 45 BLD K AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500020500
JONES MILTON V
50 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CH1LISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 50 BLD L AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030510
HAGER DE ANN
P O BOX 8197
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 51 BKD M AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030530
BUCHANAN MARY ANN
53 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 53 BLD M AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030540
GILLESPIE FRED
#54 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNtIOUSES COND
UNIT 54 BLD M AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030560
RAY GRETCHEN R
#56 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 56 BLD N AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030580
MC KINLEY R E
58 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 58 BLD N AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030600
HART GEORGE A JR ETUX GAN
60 ROCK CREEK DRIVE
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 60 BLD O AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030610
WrNSTON LLOYD G ETUX ELOI
61 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 61 BLD O AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030620
SIS'LEY NINA MAE
62 ROCK CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 62 BLD O AND 1/66 1NT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030630
SWEENEY KEVIN ET UX
7324 MC ARDLE #63
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 63 BLD P AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
Ownership List
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 13
9C
Z0302-02 744500030660
SIZEMOKE MARSHALL A
66 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 66 BLD Q AND 1/66 1NT 1N
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030680
SEEVERS JO ANN W
68 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 68 BLD Q AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030700
LA GRONE FREEDA H
70 ROCK CREEK
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CREEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 70 BLD R AND 1/66 INT IN
COMMON ELEM
9C
Z0302-02 744500030710
REDUS SAMUEL T ETUX
71 ROUND CREEK DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
ROCK CKEEK TOWNHOUSES COND
UNIT 71 BLD RAND 1/66 [NTIN
COMMON ELEM
10
Z0302-02
TEXAS DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
1701 S. PADRE ISLAND DR.
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78412
SP
Z0302-02 247600280017
OSI-]~VIAN INVESTMENTS LTD
4350 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
FLOUR BLUFF & E/qC FRM GDN
TRACT 1.989 ACS OUT OF SE~2 OF SE
4 ACS LT 1 SEC 28
SP
Z0302-02 247600280020
OSHMAN YNVESTMENTS LTD
4350 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRM GDN
TRACT 5 ACS OUT OF W/2 OF W/2
OF LT 2 SEC 28
SP
Z0302-02 247600280017
OSHMAN INVESTMENTS LTD
4350 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FRaM GDN
TRACT 1.989 ACS OUT OF SE/2 OF SE
4 ACS LTI SEC 28
SP
Z0302-02 247600280018
OSI-IMA~ 131VESTMENTS LTD
4350 OCEAN DR
CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412
FLOUR BLUFF & ENC FILM GDN
TRACT 1.989 ACS OUT OF NWl2 OF
SE 4 ACS LT 1 SEC 28
Z0302-02
CHARLES IRWIN, PRESIDENT
PHARAOH VALLEY
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN.
P. O. BOX 81032
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412
Z0302-02
JERRY WAGNER
SOUTHBAY HARBOR
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN.
1018 HARBOR LIGHTS
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412
H:~P LN-D IR~ERMA\WO RD\OWNERS HIP LISTx0302~}2OWNERSHI?.DOC
COMMENTS RECEWED
FROM NOTICES MAILED
Case No. 0302-02
Oceanic Development, Ltd.
· - FAVOR
X - OPPOSED
(Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.)
I. Notices retumed fi-om within the 200-foot notification area:
Favor:
8C)
Patsy S. Smith, 37 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
Opposition:
Carriage Park Townhomes
8C) Mary Ann Auforth, 76 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) David W. and Jane E. Barnard, 64 Townhouse Lane
"This would result in excessive congestion and traffic in what is now a relatively
quiet residential area."
8C) Elizabeth H. Betts, 78 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Cecil A. Cotton, 108 Townhouse Lane
"More apartments with increased traffic would make it harder to get out onto
McArdle from Carriage Park."
8C) Ada Crowell, 100 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Patricia Deadman, 105 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Letha Doran, 58 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) John M. Etheridge, M. D., 2 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 2
8C) Mr. and Mrs. Charles J. Fadden, 23 Townhouse Lane
"Additional traffic, speeding, noise level, lower property value, and taxes
presently being paid."
8C) Michael Gadell, 96 Townhouse Lane
"McArdle Road isn't adequate for more traffic."
8C) I.M. Gersmann, 22 Townhouse Lane
"Too much traffic."
8C) Nancy C. Harwell, 73 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Gaston W. Hix, 71 Townhouse Lane
"Traffic is already a problem on narrow McArdle Road with no curb. Petty theft
in townhouses from apartment youths. Type of business not stated in notice."
8C) Dora L. Lambert, 33 Townhouse Lane
"We mostly are all senior citizens in this area and don't need the traffic."
8C) Garland Lange, 24 Townhouse Lane
"Property value, more noise, traffic would increase probably along with boom
boxes. Other adverse noise that will detract from living quality of life."
8C) E. Jeanne La Feber, 39 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Mack Lee, 110 Townhouse Lane
"Proposed zoning changes would cause additional traffic on McArdle Road."
8C) Peggy J. Love, 92 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Louise Marcy, 27 Townhouse Lane
"We already have too much traffic on the poorly maintained two-lane McArdle
Road."
8C) Riley E. Moore, 31 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 3
8C) Frank N. Nance, 48 Townhouse Lane
"Allowing business zoning on this area on McArdle Road will interfere with the
residential quality of the neighborhood. Traffic on McArdle road, already heavy,
would greatly increase."
8C) Bettie R. Nelson, 4 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Douglas W. Nicol, 49 Townhouse Lane
"Would add to traffic, noise, vandalizing, and noise."
8C) Lillian F. Norman, 30 Townhouse Lane
"I do not want the value of my property lowered by apartments, etc.)
8C) Kathryn J. Parker, 93 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Nellie B. Rawlings, 5 Townhouse Lane
"Increased traffic in an already congested area."
8C) Mack Ray, 104 Townhouse Lane
"Opposed to multi-family construction. The city has plenty of apartments now
and the area does not favor that kind of over development anyway."
8C) Berneice H. Reilly, 101 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Ihs S. Robinson, 84 Townhouse Lane
"Will lower our property values. Heavier traffic/truck traffic."
8C) Joe M. Sassman, 69 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Patricia Schieffer, 79 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Robert G. and Margaret J. Schrot, 107 Townhouse Lane
"Detrimental to family dwellings, noise."
Comments
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 4
8C) Edward and Coralea Shaw, 38 Townhouse Lane
"We already have several apartment complexes in the area, as well as, a
restaurant, night club, day care center, and mini-market. The added traffic fxom
more apartments and general business would only devalue our property."
8C) Gretchen Smith, 35 Townhouse Lane
"There would be too much traffic in the area."
8C) James H. and Jimmie L. Smith, 94 Townhouse Lane
"Increased traffic on already busy street."
8C) James and Retha Still, 25 Townhouse Lane
"We do not think that it will be beneficial to the neighborhood to build more
apartments in this area."
8C) Mr. and Mrs. Jack M. West, 113 Townhouse Lane
"In this area, McArdle is a two-lane street! We don't need more traffic!"
8C) Stephanie Wilkerson, 46 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Gary M. and Virginia C. Zink, 59 Townhouse Lane
No written comment.
8C) Frank T. and Elizabeth C. Zitzo, 68 Townhouse Lane
"We do not want to see more commercial or apartments in this already
overcrowded neighborhood. McArdle Road is already over the limit for the size
street for traffic."
Rock Creek Townhomes
9C) George A. Hart, Jr., 60 Rock Creek
"Increased traffic on an already congested, narrow, rough street (McArdle Road).
Decrease in property values."
9C) V.E. Liles, 17 Rock Creek
No written comment.
9C) Ralph H. and Mary Lou Mackler, #I Rock Creek
No written comment.
Comments
Case No. 0302~02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 5
II.
9C) Nadalin Family Trust, E. R. Nadalin, Trustee, 30 Rock Creek
"At this time, what type dwellings price range, etc, lot size, etc."
9C) Kathlyn A. Sweeney, 63 Rock Creek
"I don't want a business located across the street from Rock Creek!"
Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area:
Favor: None.
Opposition: None.
III.
Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area:
Favor:
Oshman Investment, Ltd., 4350 Ocean Drive
No written comment.
Opposition: None.
H :~P LN-DIR\ERMA\WORD\COMMDATA\0302-02COMMENTS.DOC
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
Oceanic Development, Ltd.: 0302-02
REQUEST:
"R-1A" One-family Dwelling District and "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to "B4"
General Business District on Tract I and "A-I" Apamnent House District on Tract 2 on
property described as Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 28, being
6.5 acres out of Lots 1 and 2, and located on the north side of South Padre Island Drive,
approximately 450 feet east of Rodd Field Road.
Mr. Saldafia presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the
smrounding area. Tract I is a remaining "R-IA" District property with adjacency to approximately six (6)
acres of land to the east that is zoned with a "B4" District having frontage along the access road of South
Padre Island Drive. The majority of the six (6) acre area is develop commercially with approximately one
(1) acre remaining undeveloped. West of Tract 1 is approximately 6.5 acres of "A-I" District property
developed as an apar~nent complex. North of Tract I is an undeveloped area zoned with an "A-I" District.
South of Tract 1, across South Padre Island Drive, is approximately 78 acres of undeveloped "R-lB"
District property. At the southeast comer of South Padre Island Drive access road and Rodd Field Road is
two (2) acres of "B-4" District property developed as a convenience store. East of Tract 2 is an
undeveloped area consisting of approximately eight (8) acres that is zoned a "R-lB" District and a one and
one-half (1.5) acre area that is zoned an "A-I" District that remains undeveloped. West of Tract 2 is an
"A-I" District property that is developed with an apartment complex. North of Tract 2, across McArdle
Road, is "R-2" District property developed as townhouses. South of Tract 2 is undeveloped "B-4" District
property.
The applicant has requested a change of zoning on Tract 1 from "R-lA" One-family Dwelling District to a
"B-4" General Business District in order to develop the subject property with a retail establishment. The
applicant's representative has indicated to staff that a sale is pending for Tract 1 subject to a change of
zoning being approved. Once the purchase of the 1.2-acre property takes place the applicant plans to seek
a retail user for the property. The majority of the "B-4" District property east of Tract I is developed with a
variety of uses including coffee/bar shop, auto rentals and boat sales. A six (6) foot-screening fence would
be required along the north and west boundary of the tract since residential adjacency exists. Tract 1 has
access from the South Padre Island Drive, an expressway, with a frontage road. Approval of the requested
"B-4" District would be an expansion on the adjacent "B-4" District to the east.
A pending sale of Tract 2 is subject to a change of zuning from "R-lA" District and "R-lB" One-
family Dwelling District to an "A-I" Apartment House District. Tract 2 is a 5.3-acre area that is east of an
existing "A-I" District property that is developed as an apartment complex and is owned by the applicant.
Subject to the change of zoning, the applicant plans to expand the existing 2-story apartment complex onto
Tract 2 and on an one (1) acre area north of Tract 2 that is owned by the applicant and zoned with an "A4"
District. The "A- 1" District has a density of 21.78 units per acre or possible 115 units on Tract 2, or 137
units on Tract 2 including the adjacent one (1) acre "A-I" District property to the north. As part of the
adjacent apartment complex expansion, Tract 2 could have access from the frontage road of South Padre
Island expressway and along McArdle Road, a collector to the north. Access to the property will not
traverse a residential area. Proper~ across McArdle Road, north of Tract 2, is develop as townhouses that
are classified as multi-family uses. Approval of the requested "A-I" District would be an expansion of the
adjacent "A-l" District to the north, east and west, and compatible with the townhouse development to the
north, across McArdle Road, that is zoned "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District. Therefore, Staffrecommends
approval of the rezoning request.
Of the notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius, one was received in favor and
42 in opposition. The 42 are the condos to the north which are the Carriage House and Rock Creek
Townhomes.
Planning Commission Minutes
March 13, 2002
Case No. 0302-02 (Oceanic Development, Ltd.)
Page 2
Commission asked about the vacant land at the rear of the property. Mr. Saldafia said that the
properly owner wants to expand for apartments and the vacant is akeady zoned "A-I" District.
Willard Hams, II, 4418 Ocean Drive, said the intent for Tract 2 is to build a phase of an apartment
complex. With regard to the six (6) acres to the rear, there are plans to develop the property with
commercial development consistent with the surrounding uses.
Public hearing closed.
Motion by Sween-McGtoin , seconded by Zamora, to forward a recommendation for a "B-4"
General Business District on Tract 1 and "A-I" Apartment District on Tract 2. Motion passed with Pusley
and Mims being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY
OCEANIC DEVELOPMENT, LTD., BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP
IN REFERENCE TO 6.5 ACRES OUT OF LOTS I AND 2, SECTION 28,
FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, FROM
"R-IA" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT AND "R-I B" ONE-FAMILY
DWELLING DISTRICT TO "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ON
TRACT I AND "A-I" APARTMENT HOUSE DISTRICT ON TRACT 2;
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY
DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of Oceanic Development, Ltd. for
amendment to the of the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
March 13, 2002 during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, April
16, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in
the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear
and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Chdsti, Texas, is
amended by changing the zoning on 6.5 acres out of Lots 1 and 2, Section 28, Flour
Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located on the north side of South Padre
Island Ddve, approximately 450 feet east of Rodd Field Road, from "R-lA" One-family
Dwelling District and "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4' General Business
Distdct on Tract I and "A-1" Apartment House District on Tract 2. The 6.5 acres is
described by metes and bounds on the attached Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1973, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
~-EGAL~LAW~EG-D~R~D~y~eDCurtis~MYD~S~2~P&Z~RD~2~z~n~ng~rd~D~YLE~2~2\~cean~c~Deve~p;Z~3~2~2A~rd~d~c
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 16th day of April, 2002.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 9 April, 2002
James R. Bray, Jr.
City ~,~t~ne~y
boyle D{'l~rtis
Senior A§sistant City Attorney
t~--EGAL~AVV~LE G-DIR~Doyle DC u r tis'~IYDOCS~2002\P&ZORD02~o ning. o ra.~DOYLEC~002\Ocea nic. Develop.Z030202A.Ord.doc
Feb-27-o2 O3:36P Feon[J~ Surveying
?~0 luffalo St, Ste. SOZ
361 88~ 8340
P. 02
ZONE A-I
FIELD NOTES DF-,SCRIPTION
5.3 acres ofiand, more or ~ situated in a certain Oshman ln,mstmen~ Lat, tract recorded in Document
No. 944727 of tho Official Records of Nug~cs CountY. Term and being out of ~ctiou 28 of the Flour Bluff
Being mor~ fully desc, xFoed by metes and beunds as follows:
BI~IHfqING at a point on ~e 5outhern llne of McArd~ Rond for rite Not.west corner of Lot 4 A. Block
Jmlm Tract recorded in Vohnne 34, Pnge 26 of the Plat ltxcords of Nuece~ County, Texas for ~e
Northeast comer of th~ 5.3 acres
THENCE~, $29027' 19" W-~19.$8 feet nJor~ the Wastem line ofsajd Lot 4 A, Biock..A.,the
Western lino of Lot 4-B Block"A" Joslhz Tract zecorded in Volume 35, Pago 69 0fthe Plat
Records of Nueces County, Texas to a point for the ,~uthzast corner of this 5.3 acres.
TI~ENCE: N 63° 24' 02' W- 321.70 feet to a point ou the Eastern line of Lot 2. BI~k"A'
TH~NC£; N 29° 27' ID" E = 599.93 feet along the Eastern line of s~id Lot 2 Block "A' $oMin
Tract to a point for thc We. zt~mnost No~hwc-st oocn~' of this &3 acres.
THENCE,. S 60° 40' 00" E - 155. I 0 feet to e point f~r an interior comer of Ihi~ 5~3 acre~,
THENCE: N 29° 27' i 9" E- 235.00 feet to a point on the So.bern line of McArdle Road for fac
Northernmost Notthwast comer of fids 5.3 acres.
TI-I£,,VC£: S 60° 40' 00" E - 166.20 feet along said Southern line of McArdle Road lo the
FI.,.4 CE OF 8E~IIV.*'VING and coulatnin8 5.3 acres of tnna~ more or less,
THIS DESC~ON W,4,~ PREPARED FROM F-XI~TING RECORD~ AND DOE.5 NOT
COPI,~TITUTE AN ON THE GROUND SURVI~Y.
EXHIBIT A
~eo ~/ u~ O3:37P FrontiRr Surveying
71o Buf~ St, me. ~
361 881 8340
P · 03
FIELD NOTES DESCRII~ION
I ~ acres of land, more or Jess, sJttul~ hi a ce4~ O~/nveatraaflts, Ltd, t~act recorded in Doc,m.~.~t
No. 944/27 of thc Offloial R.ccords ofNucces Count~, Tex~ and bein8 out of Scctioa 28 of the Sour Bluff
and Eaciaal Fan~ and Om*d~ Tracls.
Being more ~ully described by mete~ and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a po/hr o~ the Northcm line of South Padre bland Drive at the Southeast comer of Lot 2,
Bloc~"A" Jo~ltn Tract recorded ~n Volume 40, Page 2 of the Plat Records of Nucces County, Texas for the
Southwest co~nef of this 1.2 ac~.
THENCE: N 29° 2'P 19" E - 340.49 fee~ along the Ha.stem lino of said Lot 2, Block "A" JoMin
Tra~t to a point for thc Northwest corner of this 1.2 a(xcs.
THENCE: S 63° 24' 02' E - 155 .?.9 feet to a point for the Northeast comer of this
THEJVCE: S 29° 27' 19" W - 342.90 feet to a point on the Northern line of South Fadre Island
DTiVO for the Southeast corner of this ! .2 acres
THENCE: bl 62° 30' 46" W- 155.19 feet along .~id Northern line of So~h Padre Island Drive
to the PLACE OF BE~INNIIfO and containing 1.2 ~ores of land, more or
THIS DF~CRIPTION WAS PREPAreD FROM EXISTING RECORD~ AND DOF~ NOT
CONSTITUTE AN ON THE GROUND
EXtIIBIT A
Notes and Comments