Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 10/22/2002CITY COUNCIL AGENDA "Corpus Christi Celebrating 150 Years" October 22, 2002 12:00 p.m. -Joint Luncheon with the Convention and Visitor's Bureau to discuss the results of their annual audit, 2001-2002 Performance Review, 2002-2003 Performance Goals and Media Plan, and to present a report on the economic impact of the Visitor's Industry (City Hall, 61 floor conference room) 1:45 p.m. Proclamation declaring October 20 - 26, 2002 as "Week Without Violence" Proclamation declaring October 22, 2002 as "Dispute Resolution Day" Proclamation declaring October 26, 2002 as "Make a Difference Day" Swearing-in Ceremony for Newly Appointed Board, Commission and Committee Members AGENDA CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1201 LEOPARD OCTOBER 22, 2002 1:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 5:30 p.m. or at the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Si ud. Desea dirigirse ai Concilio y cree que su inglds as limitado, habrS un intdrprete inglds-espariol on todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarie. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-880-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Reverend Anson Nash, Padre Island Baptist Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States. D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor Pro Tem Javier D. Colmenero Council Members: Brent Chesney Henry Garrett Bill Kelly Rex A. Kinnison John Longoria Jesse Noyola Mark Scott City Manager David R. Garcia City Attorney James R. Bray, Jr. City Secretary Armando Chapa Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) E. MINUTES: Approval of Regular Meeting of October 8, 2002. (Attachment # 1) F. BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (Attachment # 2) 2. Ethics Commission * Human Relations Commission G. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed, may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance; ormay modify the action specked. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting; such agendas are incorporated herein forreconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. H. CONSENT AGENDA Notice to the Public The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. CONSENT MOTIONS. RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS: (At this point the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not removed for individual consideration) 3. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to purchase a Digital Video Recording System for a total cost of $31,889 from the Chubb Security Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, for the Corpus Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 3 Christi International Airport closed circuit terminal system. Funds are available in the Federal Aviation Administration Security Compensation Grant No. 3-48-0051-33-02. (Attachment # 3) 4. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an agreementwith DataSeek Corporation, of San Antonio, Texas, to purchase Oracle 9i Standard Edition database software based on the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for $54,929.97 and including first year maintenance. The term of this contract will be for thirty-six months. This database software will be used to support multiple enterprise -wide applications. Funds have been budgeted in the Municipal Information Systems in FY2002-2003. (Attachment # 4) 5. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an agreementwith DataSeek Corporation, of San Antonio, Texas, to lease purchase two (2) HP rp7410 servers based on the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for $293,088.78 (including shipping and handling). This price includes a rebate of $36,800 as trade up. To be eligible for this rebate, the City must return the current servers within 90 days of shipment or the price will change to $329,888.78. Financing will be provided through the City's agreement with Bank of America and the term of the lease purchase will be thirty-six (36) months. The two servers will be used as database and application servers to support multiple enterprise -wide applications. Funds have been budgeted in Municipal Information Systems in FY2002-2003 and will be requested for all subsequent years. (Attachment # 5) 6. Motion approving the purchase of two (2) custom fabricated air handling units (AHU) from South Texas Equipment, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0018-03, based on low bid meeting specifications for a total amount of $38,800. This equipment is for the One Stop Development Center located at 2402 Leopard. Funds have been budgeted by the Engineering Department in FY2002-2003. (Attachment # 6) 7. Motion approving supply agreements with the following companies, for the following amounts, for approximately 2,106 gas meters in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI -0076-02 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $116,703. The terms of the contracts will be twelve -months with CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 4 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) options to extend for up to two additional twelve month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. These meters will be used by the Gas Department. Funds have been budgeted by the Gas Department in FY 2002- 2003. (Attachment # 7) National Meter, Inc. Actaris US Gas, Inc. Lancaster, Ohio Owenton, Kentucky Bid Item 1 Bid Items 2 and 3 $66,000 $9,205 McGinnis Industrial Sales, Inc. Houston, Texas Bid Items 4, 5, 6 and 7 $41,498 Grand Total: $116,703 8.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council in the amount of $6,677.97 for the purchase of equipment, supplies, and services associated with networking the Corpus Christi Fire Department Stations. (Attachment # 8) 8.b. Ordinance appropriating a grant in the amount of $6,677.97 from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund to purchase equipment, supplies, and services to network the Corpus Christi Fire Department Stations. (Attachment # 8) 9.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a modification to a grant from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for an additional $5,000 for leak detection analysis of the City's water distribution system. (Attachment # 9) 9.b. Ordinance appropriating $5,000 from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund to conduct a leak detection analysis of the City's water distribution system. (Attachment # 9) Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 5 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) 10.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the amount of $267,626 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, for funding eligible under the FY2002 Law Enforcement Block Grants program and to execute all related documents. (Attachment # 10) 10.b. Ordinance appropriating $267,626 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund to purchase law enforcement equipment forthe Police Department; appropriating $29,736 from the Law Enforcement Trust account in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund as the grant match. (Attachment # 10) 11.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 4 to the contract for consulting services with the Center for Coastal Studies in the amount of $71,170 for Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wastewater Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. (Attachment # 11) 11.b. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 4 to the contract for consulting services with the Conrad Blucher Institute in the amount of $110,370 for On -Going Salinity Monitoring in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. (Attachment # 11) 12. Resolution amending Resolution No. 022938 to change the membership of the Community Youth Development Advisory Committee from 16 to 11 voting members, with two voting positions filled by youth involved in the Youth Action Committee. (Attachment # 12) 13. Ordinance appropriating $225,377 from the Unreserved Balance in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund as State Fiscal Years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 program income to fund environmental, health, laboratory, and nursing services for the period of September 1, 2001 through August 31, 2003. (Attachment # 13) Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 6 I. REGULAR AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS. RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES: 14.a. Ordinance appropriating $508,880 from the Unreserved Fund Balance of the No. 3160 City Hall Capital Improvement Program Fund, transferring to and appropriating in the No. 5110 Maintenance Services Fund for the One Stop Development Center, with intent to reimburse the No. 3160 City Hall Capital Improvement Program Fund; amending Ordinance No. 024974 which adopted the FY2002-2003 Operating Budget by increasing revenues and appropriations by $508,880 each; amending Ordinance No. 024730 which adopted the FY2001-2002 Capital Budget by increasing appropriations by $508,880. (Attachment # 14) 14.b. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with DS&S Construction, of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $831,880 for the One Stop Development Center Project. (Attachment # 14) J. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ZONING CASES: 15. Case No. 0802-01, Ralph Diaz: A change of zoning from an "R- 1 B" One -family Dwelling District to an "1-2" Light Industrial District on Steele Addition, Block 6, Lots 55, 56, 57, and 58, located on the north side of Marguerite Street and 200 feet west of 21st Street. (Attachment # 15) Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Denial of the "I-2" Light Industrial District, and in lieu, thereof, approval of an "R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District with a "SP" Special Permit. FG► 7, 3 Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Ralph Diaz by changing the zoning map in reference to Lots 55, 56, 57 and 58, Block 6, Steele Addition, (currently zoned "R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District) by granting a Special Permit for a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 7 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) parking for employee vehicles subject to a site plan and ten (10) conditions; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account forany deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. 16. Case No. 0802-03, Yolanda Rodriguez: A change of zoning from an "R-1 B" One -family Dwelling District to a "B-4" General Business District on Alameda Park Subdivision, Block 6, Lot 30, located on the east side of Everhart Road, approximately 500 feet south of Avalon Street. (Attachment # 16) Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Denial of the "B-4" General Business District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a "B-1 A" Neighborhood Business District. ORDINANCE Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Yolanda Rodriguez by changing the zoning map in reference to Lot 30, Block 6, Alameda Park Subdivision, from "R-113" One -family Dwelling District to "BAA Neighborhood Business District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. 17. Case No. 0802-04, MTM Northwest. Inc. & MTM Northwest, LTD.: A change of zoning from a "F -R" Farm -Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District on 6.308 acres out of 9.808 acres, Nueces River Irrigation Park, west 1/3 of the east 3/4 of Lot 1, Section 2, located approximately 550 feet south of Northwest Boulevard and 525 feet west of County Road 69. (Attachment # 17) Planning Commission's and Staffs Recommendation: Approval of the "134" General Business District. ORDINANCE Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by MTM Northwest, Inc. and MTM Northwest, LTD. by changing the zoning map in reference to 6.308 acres out of 9.808 acres of the west 1/3 of the east 3/4 of Lot 1, Section 2, Nueces Irrigation Park, from "F -R" Farm -Rural District to "134" General Business District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. Agenda Regular Council Meeting October22,2002 Page 8 18. 19.a. 19.b. Case No. 0802-05, The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.: A change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-l" Neighborhood Business District on 0.07 acre out of Gardendale No.1, Block 6, Lot 7-A, located 375 feet west of South Staples Street, 300 feet north of Cain Drive and 275 feet south of Bonner Ddve. (Attachment # 18) Planning Commission's and Staff's Recommendation: Denial of the "B-l" Neighborhood Business District, and in lieu thereof, approval, approval of a "R-lB' One-family Dwelling District with a "SP" Special Permit for a parking lot. ORDINANCE Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc., by changing the zoning map in reference to 0.07 acre out of Lot 7-A, Block 6, Gardendale No. 1 Subdivision (currently zoned "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District) by granting a Special Permit for an unenclosed parking lot subject to a site plan and five (5) conditions; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. STREET ASSESSMENTS: Public Hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highways in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas (BOND ISSUE 2000): (Attachment # 19) Brookdale Street Improvements from Gollihar Road to Sunnybrook Road Whiting Street Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill Ddve to Lanier Ddve Ordinance closing the public headng on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highways in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: (Attachment # 19) Brookdale Street Improvements from Gollihar Road to Sunnybrook Road Whiting Street Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill Ddve to Lanier Ddve CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting O~ober22,2002 Page 9 imposing assessments totaling $77,685.74 against property abutting the improvements, affected railways, and property and railway owners; fixing corresponding liens on property and charges against property owners; providing for subsequent adjustment of assessment amounts and the corresponding liens and charges based on as-built conditions; specifying assessment payment terms and lien enforcement measures. 19.c. Motion authorizing the City Manager or the designee to execute a construction contract in the amount of $617,998.20 with Garrett Construction Company, of Ingleside, Texas, for the following: (Attachment # 19) Brookdale Street Improvements from Gollihar Road to Sunnybrook Road Whiting Street Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill Drive to Lanier Drive. 20.a. Public Hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highway in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas (Bond Issue 2000): (Attachment # 20) Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Starlite Lane 20.b. Ordinance closing the public hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highway in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: (Attachment # 20) Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Starlite Lane imposing assessments totaling $101,144.31 against property abutting the improvements, affected railways, and property and railway owners; fixing corresponding liens on property and charges against property owners; providing for subsequent adjustment of assessment amounts and the corresponding liens and charges based on as-built conditions; specifying assessment payment terms and lien enforcement measures. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 22, 2002 Page 10 20.c. K= 21. 22. 23. Motion authorizing the City Manager or the designee to execute a construction contract in the amount of $1,090,531.35 with W. T. Young Construction, of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Stariite Lane. (Attachment # 20) PRESENTATIONS: Public comment will not be solicited on Presentation items. Presentation to Dr. Richard Davis for 20 years of service to the City of Corpus Christi as the Medical Director for the Corpus Chdsti Fire Department (Attachment # 21) Presentation by Jerry Kane, Chairman of the Airport Board on the new Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Opening (Attachment # 22) City of Corpus Christi Housing and Community Development, Code Enforcement Division, Substandard Structure Process (Attachment # 23) PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. OR AT THE END OF THF COUNCIL MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASF LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD, PLEASE SIGN THE FORM AT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone IocMed at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petlfion or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary.) Si usted se dirige a la junta y crae que su ingl&s es limitado, habr~ un int&rprete ingl~s-espa~ol en la reunion de la junta para ayudade. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting October22,2002 Page 11 M= 24. 25. 26. 27. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. In the event the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding office. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding City of San Benito v. PG&E Gas Transmission, Texas Corporation et. al, No. 96-12-7404-A, 107th District Court, Cameron County, Texas, and the remaining claim of the City of Corpus Christi related thereto, and regarding similar claims of the City of Corpus Christi against other similar entities, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. Executive session pursuant to Texas Govemment Code Sections 551.071, 551.072, and 551.087 regarding acquisition and development of a site for a minor league baseball stadium in the Arena/Convention Center/Port of Corpus Christi area, location of a professional baseball franchise in the facility, and possible real estate agreements with the Port of Corpus Christi Authority and RSR Sports implementing the stadium, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding James Skrobamek v. City of Corpus Christi, No. 024974-F, 214th District Court, Nueces County, Texas, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding United States of America, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Application for Preliminary Permit, Project No. 12250-000, Wesley E. Seale Dam Hydroelectric Project, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting O~ober22,2002 Page12 N. REPORTS: The following reports include questions by Council to Staff regarding City policies or activities; request by Council for information or reports from Staff; reports of activities of individual Council members and Staff; constituent concerns; current topics raised by media; follow-up on Staff assignments; scheduling of future Council meetings and activities; and other brief discussions regarding city-related matters. 28. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 29. 30. 31. O. NOTE: * Upcoming Items LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: Consideration of resolutions and actions deemed appropriate by the City Council as to legislative issues before the 78th Texas Legislature. MAYOR'S UPDATE COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: POSTING STATEMENT: This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board at the front entrance to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, at 9:15 a.m., October 18 ,2002. A~'mando Chapa ~ City Secretary The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home Page at www.cctexas.com after 7:00 p.m. on the Friday before regularly scheduled council meetings. If technical problems occur, the agenda will be uploaded on the Internet by Monday morning. Symbols used to highlight action item that implement council priority issues. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) 2001-2002 CiTY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITY ISSUES Ah'port / Seawa~/Conv,,~pfl9~ Center / Arena · Continue qunrterly reporting process for these initiatives. '86 Bond Issue Imnrovements Update status on Senior Centers. · Provide communication on completion of these projects (e.g. "Report to the Community"). · Continue community involvement on issues such ns Leopard Street improvements. · Maintain the 5-year forecnst model. · Review the August 1 budget adoption deadline. (~yime Con~'ol and Prevention · Continue implementation of the Community Policing initiative. · Establish date for Crime Control and Prevention District election. Continue City participation in Youth Opportunities United and other youth crime initiatives, EmoloYee Health Care · Address concerns related to employee compensation and benefits, including health insurance. · Work to coordinate Police and Fire health benefits with those of other City employees E¢o~gmi~ Developmem ~;~les TgX · Establish deetion dntc. Stgr~ Water Utility · Reconsider implementation plan for a Storm Water Utility. Pack, err Channel · Continue quarterly reports on the progress of the TIF and Beach Restoration Project. Landfill · Continue to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of operations. · Exalnine alternatives for solid waste management system, including pfivatizafiom ll~ter~t · Continue regular updates and expansion of the City's web site, including individual council member web pages. · Establish target date for online permitting process. · CommuBigate brush pickup via e-mail. COBG · Continue active role. · Lease and complete renovation Implement current island annexation plan · Develop and approve ADA Transition Plan within 90 days. Redistrio~n~, , Develop Council.approved redistricting plan for the City of Corpus Christi Industrial District Contract · Review Industrial District contracts and determine date for approval Staff completes action requests in a timely manner. C~ty / County. Health · Continue discussions with County to determine structure and process for the most effective and efficient delivery of health services M~rkeO~o_ 0fCC Muslin and Columbus Shim * Continue to develop marketing plans for the Museum of Science and History and the Columbus Fleet NEW PRIORITY INITIATIVES AND ISSUES City staff wlll develop and present to City Council action/implementation plans for the following priority Desalination Pilot Project *Code Enforcement in Trashy Neighborhoods '~ *Employee Classification Study Ma stet Drainage Plan Garwood Water *New Golf Course *Charter Revision with Specific Charge(s) *More Funding for Economic Development *Fire and Police Contracts New Funding Sources / Plan for Inner City Improvements Improve Permitting Process (online / customer service) Padre Island Development Plan Downtown / South Central Development Plan (marina, t-heads, breakwater) Housing Emphasis / Process (older neighborhoods, working class neighborhoods) -- **Road Projects Southside Traffic Plan Relationships with Other Governments Development Initiative Packages *Park Rehabilitation *Leopard Street Curbs and Gutters Economic Development Summit and Post~Summit Meetings Agnes-Laredo Corridor Market (studies, plans) *Solid waste / Pickup Base Closures **Northwest Library Northsidc Development Plan Traffic Controls (channeling, studying on/off ramps on SPID) *Five Points Ambulance Effluent Plan for Leopard Medians RTA--Public Improvements Arts and Sciences Park Plan Budget Item ** Capital Improvement Program Item 1 PRESENT Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr. Mayor Pro Tem Mark Scott Council Members: Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Henry Garrett Bill Kelly Rex A. Kinnison John Longoria Jesse Noyola MINUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - 2:05 p.m. City Staff: City Manager David R. Garcia Deputy City Manager George Noe City Attorney James R, Bray Jr. City Secretary Annando Chapa Recording Secretary Raehelle Parry Before calling the meeting to order, Mayor Neal asked for a moment of silence for Mr. Bemey Seal, a long-time city advocate. The Mayor then called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The invocation was delivered by Mr. Henry J. Williams, Corpus Christi Christian Fellowship, and the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States flag was led by Council Member Chesney. City Secretary Chapa called the roll and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present to conduct the meeting. Mayor Neal said he wished to move Items 15 and 17 fi:om the consent agenda to the regular agenda and he wanted the executive sessions to be held prior to the presentations and the rest of the regular agenda. City Manager Garcia introduced Ms. Mary E. Dominguez as the new director of Housing and Community Development. The Mayor called for approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of September 24, 2002. A motion was made and passed to approve the minutes as presented. Mayor Neal referred to Item 2 and the following board appointmems were made: Arts & Cultural Commission Chuck Anastos (Reappointed) Sheila Rogers (Reinstated) Elizabeth Reese (Reinstated) Deborah Fullerton (Reinstated) Anne Stewart (Reinstated) Daiquiri Richard Annando Camina Norma Urban Museum of Science & History Adv. Cmte. Joe E. Martinez Jr. Grady Blount, Ph.D. Randy Lara Water Resources Advisory Committee Capt. Paula Hinger Jane Stanford, Ph.D. Minutes ~ Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 2 Storm Water Management Advisory Cmte. Hector Estrada, Ph.D. Ed A. Lopez Park and Recreation Advisory Committee Tommy E. Watson Jr. Ethics Commission Rev. Derrick Reaves (Reappointed) Fred Haley (Reappointed) Mayor Neal called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 3-18). City Secretary Chapa announced the following Council member abstentions: Mr. Kelly on Item 3 and Mr. Noyola on Items 16.a.-b. Council members requested that Item 7 be discussed. There were no comments from the audience. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes and the following passed: 3. M2002-329 Motion approving a supply agreement for part time security personnel for the Convention Center Facilities in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0138-02 with Southern Security Company of Corpus Christi, Texas, based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of$115,625. The term of the contract shall be for twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by Convention Center and Coliseum in FY2002-2003. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Kelly abstaining. 4. M2002-330 Motion approving a supply agreement with Dell Financial Services of Round Rock, Texas, for lease of approximately 600 personal computers, in accordance with the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for an estimated three-year expenditure of $1,423,782. The term of the contract will be for twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by the using departments in FY2002-2003 and will be requested for all subsequent budget years. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 5. M2002-331 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an agreement with Cingular Wireless, LLC, of Atlanta, Georgia, for wireless telephone services based on the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for an estimated annual expenditure of $251,038.20. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 3 10. The term of the contract will be for twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. This service will be used by all City departments requiring cellular service. Funds have been budgeted by the using departments in FY2002-2003. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." M2002-332 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Fencing Inc. of Texas, of Corpns Christi, Texas, in the amount of $84,895 for the J.C. Elliott Landfill fence repairs project. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." M2002-336 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Garver Construction of Houston, Texas, in the amount of $2,524,704 for the 30-inch Gravity Sewer Line from Greenwood Drive to Richter Ditch. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." M2002-337 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Garver Construction of Houston, Texas, in the amount of $1,552,629 for the Up River Road 24-inch Water Line Improvements from Lantana Road to 11-137, Phase 4. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." M2002-338 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the engineering laboratory, inspection and materials testing service contract with Professional Services Industries (PSI) of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $40,062 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Roadway and Parking Lot Improvements (Phases 2, 3 and 4). The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenem, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 4 11.a. RESOLUTION NO. 025036 Resolution determ'ming the necessity for and ordering the improvement of the following highway in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: Jamaica Street from Mediterranean to Caribbean, specifying that certain of these improvements will be paid for partly by the City and partly by assessments while others will be paid for entirely by assessments; and directing the City's Director of Engineering Services to file a Notice of Proposed Assessments with the Nueces County Clerk. The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 11.b. RESOLUTION NO. 025037 Resolution approving plans and specifications for improvements to the following highway in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: Jamaica Street from Mediterranean to Caribbean, approving the Director of Engineering Services' project conslxuction cost estimate including an estimate of the portion of costs to be paid by the City and the portion to be paid by assessments; setting a public hearing on these proposed assessments to occur during the November 19, 2002 City Council Meeting; directing the City Secretary to arrange to publish notice of this public hearing; and ordering the Director of Engineering Services to provide written notice of the public hearing to property owners. The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 12. M2002-339 Motion approving the application by the Harley-Owners Group (HOG) for the temporary closing of Chaparral Street between Lawrence Street and William Street, between 5:00 p.m., Thursday, October 17, 2002 and 2:00 a.m., Friday, October 18, 2002, pending proof of inSUrance. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 13.a. M2002-340 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Attachment No. 7 to Contract No. 7460005741-2003 with the Texas Department of Health in the amount of $128,562 to enable the Corpus Christi - Nueces County Public Health District to upgrade to a Level B Capacity in the National Laboratory Response Network for coping with bioterrorism threats. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 5 Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 13.b. ORDINANCE NO. 025038 14.a. Ordinance appropriating a grant in the amount of $128,562 from the Texas Department of Health in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for upgrading the Corpus Cbxisti-Nueces County Public Health District to a Level B Capacity Bioterrorism Testing Laboratory Facility. An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." M2002-341 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Attachment No. 06 to Contract No. 7460005741-2003 with the Texas Department of Health in the amount of $600,000 based on a $9.45 reimbursement for each participant served, to fund group nutrition education, individual counseling, and to distribute food vouchers at no cost to individuals identified as having nutritional deficiencies and/or nutritional risk during the period of October 1,2002 through September 30, 2003 as part of the Women Infant Children (WlC) Federal Program. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 14.b. ORDINANCE NO. 025039 Ordinance appropriating a renewal grant from the Texas Department of Health, in the amount of $600,000 based on a $9.45 reimbursement for each participant served, in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund to fund nutrition education, individual counseling, and to distribute food vouchers at no cost to individuals identified as having nutritional deficiencies and/or nutritional risk. An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 16.a. ORDINANCE NO. 025041' Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a lease agreement with Host International Inc. of Bethesda, Maryland, for the operation of a news and gift concession at the Corpus Christi International Airport for a period not to exceed twelve months. An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Noyola abstaining. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 6 16.b. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a long-term lease agreement with Host International Inc. of Bethesda, Maryland for the operation ora news and gif~ concession at the Corpus Christi International Airport for a term of ninety-six months. The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, and Scott voting "Aye"; Noyola abstaining. 18. ORDINANCE NO. 025043 Ordinance waiving the publication of legal notice renaming the park at 13608 Port Royal on Padre Island from Cobo Park to Douden Park. The foregoing ordinance passed on second reading by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 7, sa'eet resurfacing projects. Responding to Council Member Kelly, Mr. Angel Escobar, Director of Engineering Services, said this is a Bond Issue 2000 project and it consists of an overlay and reconstruction of damaged base areas. He said there is quite a bit of water line work to be done under Up River Road so the base failures there will be replaced. He said the roads will also include the ADA-required curb cuts. Council Member Colmenero referred to the planned resurfacing of Gotlihar Road and he asked why it is being re-striped at this time. Mr. Escobar explained that there is an immediate safety issue that needs to be addressed. He said the asphalt work will not occur for about 12 months. Mr. Colmenero asked if the concrete aprons can be leveled up and Mr. Escobar said staffwill look into that. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes a~ follows: 7.a. M2002-333 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Garver Construction of Houston, Texas, in the amount of $2,241,537 for street resurfacing on Up River Road (IH 37 to Leopard Street). The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 7.b. M2002-334 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with King-Isles Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $4,981,673 for street resurfacing on Ayers Street (South Padre Island Drive to Port Avenue) and Gollihar Road (Crosstown Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 7 Expressway to Kostoryz Road). The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." 7.c. M2002-335 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a testing services contract with Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $39,170 for materials testing on Ayers Street (South Padre Island Drive to Port Avenue) and Gollihar Road (Crosstown Expressway to Kostoryz Road). The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Mayor Neal referred to Item 19, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case: 19. Case No. 0802-02, I-IDB Enterprises, Inc.: A change of zoning from an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-4" General Business District on a 0.502 acre out of Nueces River Irrigation Park, Annex No. 1, located 150 feet north of Northwest Boulevard and 475 feet west of County Road 69. City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission and staffrecommended approval of the "B-4" General Business District. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Mr. Scott made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Mr. Noyola, and passed. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 024044 Amending the zoning ordinance upon application by HDB Enterprises Inc. by changing the zoning map in reference to 0.502 acre out of Nueces River Irrigation Park, Annex No. 1 from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations fi'om the existing Comprehensive Plan. An emergency was declared and the foregoing ordinance passed as follows: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Mayor Neal announced the executive sessions, pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 551.071, regarding Items 25, 26 and 28 on the agenda as follows: 25. Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Article V, Chapter 57, Vehicles for Hire, by Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 8 revising the provisions regarding auto wreckers and providing for penalties, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. 26. City of San Benito v. PG&E Gas Transmission, Texas Corporation et. al, No. 96-12-7404-A, 107th District Court, Cameron County, Texas, and the remaining claim of the City of Corpus Christi related thereto, and regarding similar claims of the City of Corpus Christi against other similar entities, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. 28. James Skrobarcek v. City of Corpus Christi, No. 024974-F, 214th District Court, Nueces County, Texas, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session. The executive session under Item 27 regarding the minor league baseball stadium was cancelled. The Council went into executive session. The Council returned from executive session. Mayor Neal opened discussion on Rem 15, formation of the North Padre Island Development Corporation. City Secretary Chapa stated that Council Member Kelly would be abstaining from discussing or voting on this item. City Attorney Bray explained that this item relates to the development of Packery Channel. He said that under state law the only monies that are devoted to the payment of bonds for this project are the tax increment for the district. He said some concern has been expressed that the city should not suffer any negative consequences arising out of the issuance of the bonds and one of the devices for making that even more certain is to create a municipal government corporation to issue the bonds. He said the Tax Increment Financing Act specifically authorizes the City Council to create a corporation to administer a tax increment district. He said bond counsel and city staff recommend this action, which has been taken by other cities. Mayor Neal called for public comment on Item 15. Mr. J.E. O'Brien, 4130 Pompano, asked if it is usual to appoint all staffmembers to a board of this nature. Mr. Bray replied that the statute allows that and the first appointment would nm through the end of 2002. He said staffis expecting to sell the bonds at the end of November or early December 2002. He said this is to expedite the process and another appointment will be made. Council Member Scott said that someone wants to develop property close to the channel but they are concerned that the city would use or lease out the property it has under lease with the General Land Office (GLO). Mr. Garcia said the city is in the process of executing a lease with the GLO, which the Council will have to approve. Mr. Scott said that ifsomenne wants to develop land there but they want a clear line of sight to the channel, the city should be willing to negotiate with the developer. Council Member Kinnison asked if the corporation will have an agreement directly with the city or with the tax increment finance (TIF) district. Deputy City Manager Noe said he thinks the corporation will have a relationship with both entities. Mr. Kinnison said he wants to make sure that when those agreements come back, the Council and the TIF board are the ones who maintain the Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 9 ability to evaluate the issuance of the bonds and make other decisions. Mr. Garcia reiterated that the only reason for creating the corporation is to separate the corporate entity and credit of the City of Corpus Christi from responsibility for these bonds. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes: 15. RESOLUTION NO. 025040 Resolution approving formation of the North Padre Island Development Corporation, and approving its articles of incorporation and bylaws. The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Kelly abstaining. Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 17, negotiation guidelines for development of the marina. Council Member Kinnison explained that during the negotiations with Landry's in the last few months, the Council members have been dealing with many questions from citizens. He said when he explained to people what the Council had in mind with respect to the bayfront development project, many of them replied that the Council should have shared that information with the public. Consequently, Mr. Kinnison said he used the report by the Marina Operations and Development Ad Hoc Committee (the stakeholders' group) as well as other sources in order to list key issues that he personally feels very strongly about. Mr. Kinnison said this is an opportunity for the Council to make a statement to the community that he wishes they had made three or four months ago. He said city staff had been working on an agreement that endorsed these proposed concepts yet the Council did not publicly state them. Mr. Kinnison then read the seven specific guidelines. Cotmcil Member Colmenero asked about the term "patented water area." Mr. Bray replied that in 1919 there was legislation where the state gave to the city an area that was under the waters of Corpus Christi Bay. He said today that area extends roughly from the U.S.S. Lexington Museum on the Bay down to Cole Park and out to approximately the end of the breakwater. He said when it was granted, the area included basically back to Water Street, which was on the shoreline. He said there was a patent by the governor in 1924 that carried out that grant of bay bottom to the city. Council Member Chesney thanked Mr. Kinnison for taking on this task of clarifying the negotiation issues. He discussed the process that was followed and said he believes this is a positive step. Council Member Scott said there was extensive public input on the marina development issue. He said the City Manager also addressed the concerns about prohibiting gambling on the T-Heads and maintaining public access to them. He said he supports the proposed resolution. Mayor Neal called for public comment on Item 17. Mr. Roy Pell, 5022 Rasputin Court, said he was a member of the marina ad hoc committee, which took their charge very seriously and came back with a comprehensive list of issues which were passed on to city staff. He said they had a process in place to move forward with marina development. However, through a petition drive a certain group of citizens brought that process to Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 10 a halt. He said he and others are working very hard to defeat Proposition 4 on the November 5, 2002 ballot and hopefully they can get marina development back on track. He applauded Mr. Kinnison for his reaffirmation of what the ad hoc committee had done. Mr. R.F. Hasker, 1813 Wallace, said he remembers a brochure developed by Landry's which showed that the T-Heads would be closed down and would consist of a carnival atmosphere. He questioned when this information was put before the taxpayers and he said the Council tried to push the agreement with Landry's through the process. Mr. Colmenero said Landry's representatives indicated that their initial brochure was not going to be the actual pmject. Council Member Longoria said that closing access to the T-Heads was never part of any plan. Mr. Bob Patterson, 4734 Ocean Dr., said he welcomes the resolution, saying it is too far down the road to be holding things back from the public. He said he thinks the resolution should contain an admonition to the negotiators to follow current city charter provisions. Mr. Patterson said that according to a city document he obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Mr. Bray and others discussed strategies prior to the June 3, 2002 meeting of the Marina Operations and Development Ad Hoc Committee. According to the document, Mr. Bray said that if the proposal involved any water areas of the marina, an election would have to be held. Mr. Patterson said that somehow the Council strayed from that legal advice and an election has been fomed by the citizens. He said the charter has a provision that if there is a lease over water, an election must be held. He asked that the Council consider that in their resolution. Mr. Bray replied that if it is a water area, it requires a lease. If it is part of the existing land masses (the T-Heads and L-Head), then it falls within the provision that the City Council can grant a lease and the lease is not effective for 60 days after that and within that time a 10% petition could require an election. He said an election is required on the front end of the present charter only for the water areas themselves, not for the land areas. Mr. Patterson said the city is proposing to give Landry's control for 40 years of the marina and he believes that is control of the water areas. Mr. Longoria said that under the charter the Council has that authority fight now. Mr. Patterson said the Council has the authority to do that for a five-year lease and the citizens can vote on anything beyond that. Mr. Longoria said that is incorrect. Council Member Kelly said this resolution is necessary because people (some of whom were members of the stakeholders' committee) have gone into the community and made accusations that the Council is somehow violating the charter by negotiating to lease the T-Heads and suggesting that they are part of the water area. He said these types of representations are designed to mislead the public and scare them into signing petitions. He said it is unfortunate that this resolution is necessary. Mr. Kinnison asked Mr. Bray if there is anything in the Landry's negotiations about it being a water lease. Mr. Bray replied that the Landry's proposal has not been to lease the water areas but rather the land areas. He said the up-front election requirement would only be necessary ifa water lease was involved but that is not what is being proposed. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 11 Mr. Jack Gordy, 4118 Bray, said the resolution is a little bit late and it is not binding like an ordinance is. He said if Texas citizens vote to make gambling legal, it can be allowed on the T- Heads. He said the resolution will not change people's attitudes. Mr. Kinnison said the resolution is binding because it involves the Council giving their word and if they go back on that, they do not need to be on the Council. He said the only way he would vote on an agreement is if it meets the criteria outlined in the resolution. He agreed that a majority of a furore Council has the right to change the resolution, but by adopting this the Council is giving its word. Mr. Colmenero said the Council has worked on similar projects, such as the convention center and seawall, and this resolution is a way to move that process forward. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 17. RESOLUTION NO. 025042 Resolution establishing guidelines for city staff to follow in negotiations for development of the marina and the patented water area. The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 22 pertaining to the arena project. City Secretary Chapa said that Council Member Kelly would be abstaining from discussing or voting on this item. Deputy City Manager Noe explained that in November 2000 the voters approved the 1/8 cent sales tax for the construction of the multipurpose arena and the Council has received several presentations about the project. Mr. Noe said the financing is done through the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (the 4A board), which is responsible for allocating the dollars. He said that at the conclusion of the project, the facility will be turned over to the city for operation. Mr. Noe referred to the presentation information provided to the rating agencies and bond insurers during meetings with them on October 2-4, 2002. He said the arena's financing basically tracks the financing for the seawall renovation proj eot: there is a pledge for the sales tax to repay the bonds. He described specific aspects of the arena project and said the construction cost is estimated to be just over $35 million, with design fees and construction management and other fees for a total net funding requirement of $46.56 million. Mr. Noe also discussed the arena operating budget pro forma, including cash flow and debt sexwice coverage. He noted that this is a parameter sale and at this point the plan is to go to the market during the week of October 21st and they anticipate bringing bids to the Council on October 29~. He said staffexpects the bids to come in below their estimate. He said the proposed resolution was unanimously adopted by the 4A board yesterday. Mayor Neal called for comments on Item 22. Mr. J.E. O'Brien said that an article in the local newspaper dated November 8, 2000 said the city was to get the new arena in 2003 at a cost of $35 million. He quoted from the article which cited Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 12 a study conducted by PKF Consulting. He also referred to a July 28, 2002 article that said the new arena is moving ahead as planned and will cost $40 million. Mr. O'Brien also quoted from a brochure issued by a member of the Council while he was muning for election. Mr. Noe said the $35 million was always a construction cost estimate and staff is very close to that even though they have made some good, long-term decisions; i.e., ensuring that the facility can be enlarged in the future. He said he does not think the timing of the project ever included opening at the beginning of 2003. In addition, the PKF report did not include a time schedule; rather, it discussed sizing and financial feasibility. He said the arena is on target for the 2004 season, which was staff's commitment to the Islanders and the IceRays. He said the commitment that was made to the voters was that they would build the facility within the 1/8th cent tax over a 25-year period and they are fulfilling that commitment. He said in the year 2017, if there is no other use for the bonds, there is the potential for the bonds to be paid off at that time. Council Member Kinnison complimented staff for the bond book they prepared for the presentations. He said the arena project is on track and Mr. Noe agreed that they are tentatively scheduled to break ground on November 3, 2002. Mr. Noe in mm commended Ms. Lee Ann Dumbauld, Director of Finance, and her staff for their efforts. Council Member Scott said Mr. Noe has stuck to his commitment for the 2004 season. He said the arena will be a phenomenal facility and it is evidence that the city continues to move forward. Council Member Noyola reiterated that there is a possibility the bonds could be paid off in 2017. Mr. Noe said the Council at that time will have the opportunity to dissolve the tax. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 22. RESOLUTION NO. 025045 Resolution approving the resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the execution of a project agreement, and a bond purchase agreement with respect to the arena project. The foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Kelly abstaining. Mayor Neal opened discussion on Items 23 and 24 regarding the Noble Food Service contract and the food and beverage service. Responding to Council Member Scott, Deputy City Manager Noe said that Item 23 is basically an extension of the city's current contract with Noble Food Service through August 1, 2004 under the same terms and conditions at the convention center. There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 23. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an amendment to the Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 13 lease agreement executed with Noble Food Services, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas, on November 21, 2000, by Ordinance No. 024289, and amended on December 1 l, 2001, by Ordinance No. 024685, to extend the term of the lease from 3:01 a.m. January 1, 2003, until 3:00 a.m. August l, 2004. The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye"; Kinnison absent. Mayor Neal then referred to Item 24 regarding the food and beverage service contract. Mr. Noe explained that in June 2000, PKF Consulting conducted an analysis of the Bayfront Plaza Convention Center and the proposed multipurpose arena. He said the Council accepted PKF's recommendations, which have been incorporated into the designs of both the renovated convention center and new arena. They will include a single full-service kitchen, commissaxy, club restaurant, suite food service and concession stands. Mr. Noe said that based on the input of consultants and others in the business, staff is recommending that the city use a management fee for service approach in which the city would pay a fee to a vendor for managing 'the operation. The city pays the expenses and receives all the revenues and the net revenues support the facility's operations. The Deputy City Manager said the advantages of the management fee for sen, ice arrangement are as follows: allows the facility to control the quality of service; provides for flexibility in dealing with customers; it is the most suitable for the transition from the current system; it is recommended by Conventional Wisdom; and it is similar to the arrangement at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and SMG. Mr. Noe said staff is proposing a two-step process t hat involves sending a request for qualifications (RFQ) to all potential vendors and then the list is reduced to a small number of finalists, who will be asked to submit an actual detailed proposal. He said the proposal will include the name of the food and beverage manager and will involve site visits. He also outlined the proposed schedule, which includes recommending a firm to the Council in February 2003 with pre- opening operations set to begin in April 2003. He added that the evaluation will include criteria for branded and local food items. City Manager Garcia pointed out that even though this is called a "food and beverage" contract, the city is requesting a major (probably multi-million dollar) capital investment on the part of the successful bidder. Mr. Noe introduced Mr. David O'Neal with Conventional Wisdom, the consultant on the project. Mayor Neal said that fight now the city has a contract with a local vendor but the people who rent the convention center are not obligated to use that vendor. However, under this proposal that will no longer be an option. Mr. Noe replied that if there is some unique event, there is the opportunity to use another vendor but that would be the exception. The Mayor asked if staff has considered the economic impact on local caterers if this proposal is adopted and Mr. Noe said they have not. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 14 Council Member Longoria asked about the vendorproviding the equipment. Mr. O'Neal said that in many buildings, the food service vendors are asked to make a substantial capital contribution to the project. He said the monetary requirement of the vendor will become clearer as the budget for this project is finalized. Mr. O'Neal acknowledged that this process somewhat limits the pool of available candidates but this request is often made of the larger food service providers and it is built into the rate. Mr. O'Neal went on to say that such an arrangement may be a necessity for the convention center and arena due to the extensive mount of food service equipment that is required for the joint facilities. He added that this is a change fi.om the current practice and it places Corpus Christi on the same par as San Antonio, Austin and other statewide competitors. He also noted that this arrangement provides the city with a great deal of flexibility. He said the proposal phase will allow local caterers/vendors to bid on the suite catering services in the arena. Mr. Garcia said that a key element in attracting large conventions is the ability to negotiate-- often years in advance~the entire food and beverage package along with the meeting rooms and banquet halls. Mr. Longoria said this arrangement, which is also used at the Solomon Ortiz International Center, essentially fi.eezes out small businesses. He questioned how the city will provide opportunities for them, for example, in the arena's food court. He also asked whether the convention center will have its own permanent food court. Mr. Noe said there are seven concession stands in the arena and one of the things staff will evaluate as part of the proposal will be how the vendor elects to handle those goods and services. He said there is also a complete restaurant in the club in the arena, as well as kiosks and push carts. Mr. Garcia said the Council will have several decisions to make throughout this process. However, the F&B manager will have to be on board and committed substantiallybefore the opening of the arena because he will need to be a key part of the finish-out of that facility. Mr. Longoria said this will be a dramatic change not only for the local caterers but for the users as well because the prices will go up. Mr. O'Neal pointed out that there is a two-year transition period before the facility opens as well as another two years in which the usage will stabilize. He said if the convention center is doing its job, it will be booked up years in advance and the number of dates that will be available for smaller local events will be diminished fi.om what it is now. He said this may justify creating or converting a local meeting/banquet hall that is either separate from the convention center and arena facilities or part of the same complex. Mr. Longoria said he thinks the request for proposals should address how the F&B manager will provide opportunities for local caterers. Mr. O'Neal said a savvy proposer will understand the local climate and the wishes of the Council. Responding to another question from Mr. Longoria, Mr. Noe said the pro forma in the bond presentation book includes a line item estimating $325,000 a year in food and beverage revenues in the arena. He said it is the difference between breaking even and losing money. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 15 Mayor Neal asked if it is possible to design an RFQ/RFP in which the city caters to large conventions through a large vendor while retaining the ability for local caterers to service smaller groups. He added that since the Ortiz Center and TAMU-CC now use this arrangement, if the city adopts it as well there will be no place lett for local people to use their own caterers other than Del Mar College. Mr. Noe replied that it is not the goal of city staff to shut out local businesses but rather to meet the expectations of the people to which they are selling the building. Mr. Garcia said they need to remember the promises they made to the people who are paying this tax. He said staff had extensive meetings with the hospitality industry about what the city would do and how they would move them into a different market. He said they are expecting the city to provide a state-of-the-art facility that will atlract the conventions that have been lost. He noted that the hoteliers and the restaurateurs do not derive a lot of revenues from the local events, aside from the catering aspect. He said there is a possibility of using Memorial Coliseum for local events. Council Member Noyola discussed the importance of using local businesses in the convention center and arena. Responding to Council Member Kinnison, Mr. O'Neal said the management fee for service approach offers the city the flexibility to do anything. He said there are facilities that have some "official" caterers that the F&B manager permits to service local events and they have to meet certain criteria and standards. He said there are many ways to approach this issue. Mr. Noe said staff is recommending this approach because it is easier to work through such concerns. Mr. Kinnison said if the city has the funding, it should build out the kitchen rather than requiring the vendor to do so. Council Member Garrett asked about the services provided by Noble Food Services. Mr. Hal Peterson explained that for many years that company has been running the concession operation at the convention center and Memorial Coliseum. He said they do some catering but it is mostly concessions. He added that currently people can hire their own caterer, who has a contract with the city and pays the city 10% of what they charge the customer. Mr. Garrett said the Council has made it clear that they do not want local caterers to be eliminated in this process. Mr. Peterson said the convention center has a "finishing" kitchen but it is not a full facility. Mayor Neal postponed discussion on Item 24 in order to hear petitions from the audience. Mr. Stanley Andrick, 3902 Westland, said that for many years he attended Council meetings but lately had been unable to because he was eating for his ill wife. He said in the future he anticipates being more active in the city's affairs. He said CPL is possibly planning to close three of its local plants and he said it may be an opportunity for the city to own its own electric plant. Mr. J.E. O'Brien said that unless there was a pressing reason to change the time when the executive sessions were held, he feels it shows a decided lack of consideration for the public. Mr. Jack Gordy said that political signs for both Forward Corpus Christi and Tony Sanchez are located in the right-of-way all over the city. He said he called Code Enfomement and they removed Mr. Sanchez's signs but not Forward Corpus Christi's signs. He also discussed the confidentiality of utility bills, saying that he thinks the city received a letter fi.om the state saying that Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 16 if the proper form is not on file, the information is not confidential. Responding to Mr. Noyola, City Manager Garcia said that Mr. Gordy indicated that his utility bill is in his daughter's name and generally city staff do not release information unless they receive a formal open records request. Assistant City Manager Jorge Cruz-Aedo said that the accounts note whether o r not t he information i s confidential. M r. G arcia s aid t here i s a standard format for requesting public information which allows staff a period of time within which to respond. Mr. Lewis Lovelace, 1549 Casa Grande, asked about the status of building steps to the water at Airheart Point. He requested a copy of all paperwork that has been dra~ed to date on that issue and he asked to sit in onthe design of the project. Mr. Escobar said staff has completed the topographic survey to determine the angle at which the steps will be constructed but the drawings have not yet been started. He said if the funds are available, the project may be completed by the first of next year. Mr. Michael Gunning, Planning Director, added that in the next few weeks the adjacent property owner's engineer is supposed to submit the construction plans for the improvements that are unrelated to Mr. Lovelace's request. Mayor Neal returned to the discussion on Item 24, food and beverage contract. Council Member Colmenero suggested that a list of pre-negotiated subcontractors be developed to facilitate the convention center's and arena's services. Council Member Chesney said there are very few local businesses that can provide the millions of dollars in capital and serve as a concessionaire. Mr. Noe replied that staffis expecting several local companies to bid on this project. He said that with or without the capital investment, this is a large operation-they are expecting gross revenues of about $5 million. Mr. Chesney said the Council has to balance the needs of the facilities with the concerns raised by local vendors. Mr. Noe said the single-caterer/full-service operation policy issue has been in place since the PKF study in 2000; the capital investment idea has arisen as part of the budget discussions. Responding to Council Member Scott, Mr. Noe said the RFQ was contained in the Council's agenda packet. He said when staff puts out the RFP, based on the information in the construction bids, they will know whether the city can afford to pay for the kitchen equipment out of the existing funding or whether it will be required of the vendor. In addition, based on the Council's comments today, staff will draft additional language to spell out local participation more clearly to meet the Council's objectives. Mr. Scott asked if including the local businesses will jeopardize the city's ability to not only compete with but beat other cities' conventioneer efforts. Mr. O'Neal said it should not. Mr. Noe said it will, however, cost the city money because the revenues will be lower than with a single entity that has a lock on the business. Mr. O'Neal referred to the example of the convention center in Overland Park, Kansas, a suburb of Kansas City. Mayor Neal called for public comment on Item 24. Mr. J.E. O'Brien said the Mayor and Council have some very valid points in this discussion. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 17 He said that free enterprise is based on competition, which benefits consumers. He said consideration for local businesses should be the Council's utmost concern and the staff's proposal should be rejected, or at the very minimum, it should be tabled. He said he supports an open catering policy. Mr. Tim Lyons, 431 Ohio, said he is co-owner of B&T Rents. He asked the Council to table this motion because of what he said would be far-reaching negative effects, such as businesses having to lay off people because of the convention center's "closed-door" policy. Mr. Chesney asked Mr. Lyons why tabling the item will be beneficial. Mr. Lyons replied that it will allow the Council to look into the possible economic impact of adopting this policy. Mr. Malcolm De Shields, 6834 Dorsey St., said that in 1980 there was a committee consisting of local restaurateurs who helped develop the current policy for the convention center. He said his company, the BBQ Man, has been catering there since then. He recommended that the Council seek input fi.om the caterers to address the concerns that have been raised, including having the city pay for the kitchen equipment. Mr. Garrett said that if he votes for this motion, he wants to ensure that the RFP will be drafted to include the Council's concerns about including local businesses. Mr. Noe said that rather than the city talking with the restaurants, that they place the proposers in the position of talking with the restaurants and continuing local participation. Mr. Colmenero and Mr. Noyola reiterated their comments about including local businesses. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes: 24. M2002-342 Motion authorizing the City Manager to send out a request for qualifications (RFQ) followed by a request for proposals (RFP) to retain a food and beverage company (F&B company) to manage the food service operation at the Bayfront Plaza Convention Center and new multipurpose arena for a period of five years beginning August 1, 2004. The foregoing motion passed by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 25, amendments to the auto wrecker ordinance. City Attomey Bray said that staff was recommending an amendment to delete the provision in Section 57-233 which states: "and for sustained complaints of repeated deceptive business practices, including but not limited to unconscionable actions or courses of action as defined in state law..." Mr. Bray said that language would have allowed the Police Chief to revoke a wrecker service's license that was authorized to do consent tows due to repeated instances of overcharging customers. City Manager Garcia said this amendment would remove the city from regulation of consent tows. Responding to Council Member Noyola, Assistant Chief Ken Bung said city staff met with wrecker company representatives three times and they discussed issues that were raised during the Council's discussion on September 17, 2002. Mr. Garcia and Mr. Bung discussed specific aspects Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 18 of the proposed changes, including the separate issues of work time and wait time. Mr. Noyola expressed concern that towing companies will not want to cover a large accident, such as a chemical track roll-over. Mr. Bung said that currently there are no large wreckers on the rotation list because of the fee. Council Member Garrett discussed the difference between work time and wait time and he suggested that they look again at the issue of work time because it could be important even though it is rarely used. Mr. Bung said staff's direction was to not change the fees but they can reconsider it. Council Member Chesney made a motion to amend Item 25 as stated by Mr. Bray, seconded by Mr. Noyola. The motion to amend passed unanimously on a voice vote. Mr. Garrett made a motion to amend Item 25 to allow work time in the ordinance of $200 per hour with the rest of the fees being the same; seconded by Mr. Noyola. Mr. Garcia said that provision would be added to the section on heavy tows. Another voice vote was called and the motion passed unanimously. Mayor Neal called for public comment on Item 25. Ms. Lana White, Airline Wrecker Service, said there are many details in the ordinance that can affect towing companies, such as the criminal offenses and consent rotation tows. Mr. Chuck Milks, 7430 Spitfire, suggested that the Council form a vehicle-for-hire advisory committee to receive input from that industry. He said the towing company employees often face dangers in their work. Mr. Joe Dees, 4617 McGregor, said he owns Statewide Wrecker Service. He agrees that they are moving in the right direction but there are still concerns, such as the requirement to place a sign on the tracks stating a"drop" fee of $35. He also questioned the requirement of a permit to perform wrecker services. Council Member Kinnison questioned the purpose of the drop fee sign. Mr. Garcia replied that that fee has been subject to a lot of abuse. He said there is a requirement that if a citizen encounters a wrecker company hooking up his car and the citizen contests it, the driver is required to drop the car. He said the purpose of the sign is to make citizens aware of the authorized drop fee. Mr. Dave Resendez, owner of Apollo Towing and Easy Rider Wrecker Service, said the drop fee sign will create problems because sometimes wrecker companies are authorized under the ordinance to charge more money if special equipment has to be used to hook up a vehicle. Responding to Mr. Garrett, Mr. Resendez said that currently his company's simple drop fee is $50. Mr. Jason White, with Airline Wrecker, said he supports the Police Department's efforts but the language in the ordinance regarding consent towing still needs to be amended because it appears the city is trying to regulate how they do business on a day-to-day basis. Mr. Steve Zastrow, Police Depa~hnent legal advisor, said the ordinance includes a phrase stating that the addition ora price schedule is not required if the owner of the vehicle consents to the Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 19 omission; i.e., ifa wrecker company has a long-term contractual relationship with an auto company such as AAA. Mr. White said he believes some of the language does not reflect what the city is trying to do. Mayor Neal said they will never have a perfect ordinance but the Council is trying to address abuses that have been perpetrated by a few wrecker companies. Mr. White said the wrecker companies are in favor of regulating the private property impounds (non-consent towing); however, when the city seeks to regulate consent towing, it affects the wrecker companies' operations. Mr. Ray Rivera, owner and operator of Texas Wrecker Service, said he and other companies conduct tows for the Department of Public Safety and they have $200 per hour working time and $100 per hour waiting time. He said he charges separately for other services, which are itemized. He said he does not intend to become part of the city's rotation list. Mayor Neal suggested that the Council vote on this ordinance on first reading and set the second reading for November 12, 2002, thereby letting people submit their comments to Assistant Chief Bung prior to second reading. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes: 25. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Ordinance amending the Code of ordinances, Article V, Chapter 57, Vehicles for Hire, by revising the provisions regarding auto wreckers, and providing for penalties. The foregoing ordinance passed on first reading, as amended, by the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Longoria, Noyola, and Scott voting "Aye." Mayor Neal called for a brief recess. Upon reconvening, he referred to the presentations on the day's agenda. The first presentation (Item 20) was regarding the city's E-Government and intemet $ itc services. M s. Susan C able, Director o f E-Government Services, s aid t he city h as implemented the first of the online payment and business processes with Texas Local Interactive Inc. She said citizens can now pay their utility bill online and apply for jobs with the city. She said th basketball registration will be available online prior to November 4 . Other future online initiatives are traffic ticket payments and building permits. Ms. Cable said that city staffand Farenthold Consulting Inc. have been working for several months on redesigning the city's web site, which has a new address: www. cctexas.com. She said the results of citizen surveys were used to develop the site's features. In addition, the content management system (back-end system) has been customized, which significantly increases the site's efficiency. Ms. Cable said the site also offers live video streaming and will feature an e-governance forum, a partnership with the League of Women Voters and the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. In addition to Mr. Blake Farenthold, Ms. Cable said several people participated i n the development of the new site. They include Mr. Olgivie Gericke, MIS Director; members of the city's Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 20 Utilities Billing Office and Human Resources Department; Ms. Diana Ramirez in E-Government Services; and Quadrant Productions. Ms. Cable then demonstrated several features that are available on the new site and she, Mr. Gericke and Mr. Farenthold responded to Council members' questions. She said staff is also developing interactive voice response systems for several city departments. The second presentation (Item 21) was regarding the Corpus Christi Park and Recreation open space master plan 2002-2007. Mr. Dan Whitworth, Director of Park and Recreation, said this is the first time in the city's history that they have had an adopted park master plan. Prior to this time, they have utilized area development plans. Mr. Whitwoffia emphasized that the master plan is a "living" document in that it will be reviewed every two years and revamped every five years as necessary. He said that is a requirement of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). Mr. James Carrillo, Vice President and Director of Operations for HalffAssociates, said that a park master plan is important for several reasons, including that it creates a "snapshot" of where the parks system is now; it creates a forum for citizens to indicate the types of parks, trails and other facilities they want; sets the goals for the parks, trails and open space system; and establishes the priorities for the next five to 10 years and is used as a guide for future acquisition opportunities. Mr. Cardllo said a master plan, which is also called a recovery action plan, helps the city qualify for TPWD grants for indoor and outdoor park facilities development and urban parks and recreation recovery grants from the Department of the Interior. He said the steps in the planning process include demographics, inventory of existing parks, public input (citizens' survey and public meetings), key issues, concept development, prioritization, and the master plan. He said the city's pre-established area development plans were combined into three major zones with comparable population totals-north, central and south. Referring to base population projections, Mr. Carrillo said that significant growth (as many as 16,000 people) is expected by 2007 in the far northern part of the city in Calallen, Flour Bluff and on the island. He discussed the citizen input methods that were used and the results of the survey. He noted that skate parks scored very high on the survey, which they have never seen before. He said that according to the survey, the most important facilities to construct are picnic tables (90%) and playgrounds (89%). He said there was a lot of support for renovating and upgrading existing parks. Mr. Carrillo also discussed the recommended starting standards for park acreage in Corpus Christi: neighborhood parks - 1.5 acres per 1,000 population; community parks - 4.0 acres per 1,000 population; for a total of 5.5 acres per 1,000 population for close-to-home parks. Other types of parks are special purpose parks; linear/linkage parks; and open space preserves, all of which should total 13 to 20 acres per 1,000 population. He said that currently the city has about 280 acres of neighborhood parks, which equates to 0.97 acres per 1,000 population or 65% of the recommended total. He said that 66 out of the approximately 190 parks are considered pocket parks (under three acres in size), which represents almost 35% o f t he total c itywide. A nd over 5 0% o f t he p arks i n t he system a re classified as Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 21 underdeveloped or undeveloped, with very few or no recreation facilities built in those park sites. Mr. Cardllo also discussed community parks, which currently consist of 744 acres at a ratio of 2.48 acres per 1,000 population (the recommended standard is 4.0 acres). He then reviewed park deficiencies in the three main areas: nox'ch - West Guth and Labome parks; central - Dr. Hector P. Garcia Park; and south - Bill Witt Park. Mr. Carrillo said in summary that the city has many small parks, but most are underdeveloped, which creates a significant maintenance burden. He said there are well-located "district" parks (South Guth and Bill Witt), but they are devoted mostly to athletics and the goal is to incorporate more types of activities in those parks, such as trails and picnic tables. Council Member Longoria said that Swantner Park on Ocean Drive has the potential to be another beautiful park like Cole Park but currently it has no facilities. Council Member Kelly said that many people use West Guth Park rather than going to Cole Park. Mr. Carrillo said West Guth is a great example of many uses that are available in one park. He said the city's pool and recreational facilities are fairly old and need to be addressed over time as well. Mr. Can/Ilo then reviewed the planning concepts as follows: focus on quality, not quantity; although the waterfront is important, focus on interior parks for the next five to 10 years; address one to two major parks at a time, not small portions of many parks; adopt an aggressive grant- and fund- leveraging approach; and modify the park land dedication ordinance to increase funding for new neighborhood parks. Mr. Cardllo noted that today it costs about $500,000 to develop a small, neighborhood park and under the current system, the city is not receiving enough money to develop those parks. Additional discussion ensued. Mr. Carrillo pointed out that most cities have gone to a system where they charge a developer for the land and then they charge a development fee. He said that way there is a significant amount of money up front that can be pulled together to build a park. The consultant also discussed other recommendations of the master plan. He said that Oso Creek is a major green belt away from the waterfront and more land should be acquired to create a significant linear corridor. He said they are also recommending coordinating with the drainage master plan where feasible. With regard to the action plan for the next five years, Mr. Carrillo said they are recommending the following: upgrade existing large "district" parks, $6 million to $10 million total estimated cost; develop additional athletic facilities, $4.5 million to $7 million; develop additional trails, $2 million to $3 million; focus on key underdeveloped neighborhood parks, $2.5 million over the next five years; develop one major recreation center, $3 million to $6 million; develop unique recreation opportunities, $500,000 to $1 million; and continue to acquire land for open space preserves and major parks, also $500,000 to $1 million (annually adjusted as needed). The total estimated overall cost is $19 million to $29 million. Mr. Whitworth said staff is taking the proposed park master plan to the Park and Recreation Advisory Board and the Planning Commission and then it will come back to the Council on October Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 22 29th in time to send it to the state for grant applications. City Manager Garcia said that if accepted, this plan will be included in the city's 2003-2004 budget cycle, which will be key in planning for the 2004 bond issue. Mr. Chesney discussed the efforts of the newly formed organization, Friends of the Park. He asked about businesses "adopting" parks. Mr. Carrillo discussed some of the challenges that exist in adopting parks to address maintenance issues, as well as the plan's recommended acreage standards. Mr. Scott discussed Oso Creek and Cole Park and Mr. Kelly commented on Nueces River Park. Mayor Neal suggested that the city further develop hike and bike trails. He added that the city will never solve the problems at Cole Park (irrigation needs and lack of vegetation) as long as the amphitheater remains them. Mr. Whitworth said there are things that can be done to help minimize the problems but he acknowledged that they exist. Mayor Neal also discussed the need to create a festival site and working with other governmental entities on park development. Mayor Neal called for the City Manager's report. Mr. Garcia noted that the October 15, 2002 Council meeting has been cancelled since many of the Council members will be attending the Texas Municipal League conference in Fort WoFth. He said the next meeting will be held on October 22~a beginning at noon with a joint meeting with the Convention and Visitors Bureau board, followed by the regular Council meeting. Issues to be discussed include the city's legislative agenda, zoning cases, and a presentation by the Crime Control District on the 50 police officers. The Mayor asked if the election information provided to the Council can be reproduced for others and Mr. Garcia said it can be. Mr. Noe said staff provided it to the Council to receive their feedback on it. Mr. Garmtt asked about the possibility of including that information in the Caller- Times. Mr. Noe replied that they had originally planned to put it in the Caller-Times as an insert but their prices have doubled since the last time they did that. The Mayor suggested that it be published in neighborhood newspapers which are less expensive and have a large readership. Mayor Neal also referred to a letter about the City-County Health Advisory Committee and Mr. Garcia said staff will provide a report. The Mayor also asked about the construction of the Animal Control facility and Mr. Garcia said staff is monitoring the progress of that project. The Mayor said there was an article in Texas Town and City regarding city regulations of tow trucks. He then called for Council concerns and reports. Mr. Chesney said that apparently there is high grass and standing water along Carmel Parkway and around Parkdale Library and he announced a Friends of the Park meeting on October 10K at 5:30 p.m. He thanked Mr. Garcia for his swirl response on the issue with the 600 Building and he congratulated the Bayfest organizers for having a record year. Mr. Noyola said that Mr. Herb Canales, Director of Libraries, and Ms. Patty Mueller will be attending a book festival and a reception hosted by First Lady Laura Bush in Washington, D.C. Mr. Noyola also encouraged people to attend the Texas Jazz Festival on October 18-20 and he said the Moody Civic Minded Students are holding their community convention on October 13°. Minutes - Regular Council Meeting October 8, 2002 - Page 23 Mr. Scott said he is scheduling four town hall meetings prior to the November 5~ election: October 14~, co-sponsored with Forward Corpus Christi, at Holiday Inn Gulf Beach Resort; October 15t~, co-sponsored with Pharaoh Valley Property Owners Association, at Pharaoh Valley Country Club; October 23~a at Ethel Eyerly Senior Center; and October 28a' at Robert Wilson Elementary School cafeteria. He also commented that Ms. Jean Cook's suggestion about moving the barriers on the JFK Causeway were heeded by TXDOT staff, and he said an Austin developer was impressed with city Staff, in particular Ms. Faryce Goode-Macon of the Planning Department. Mr. Scott also thanked Wastewater Superintendent Foster Crowell for his assistance with a constituent's concern and Mr. Garcia for meeting with the Padre Island Property Owners Association. Mr. Colmenero said there is a concern about Labor Ready's clients at the comer of Port and Arlington. Mr. Kelly said that Mr. Benavidez, a LULAC member, suggested that the city use police and fire employees to help identify problem areas on the streets. Mr. Garcia said staffrely on them as well as Solid Waste and meter reading employees and citizens. Mayor Neal said the J-22 World Championships are being held in Corpus Christi this week and he announced that the State of the City speech will be held October 23~ at the Bayfrout Plaza Convention Center. There being no further business to come before the Council, the Mayor adjoumed the Council meeting at 9:17 p.m. on October 8, 2002. 2 ETHICS COMMISSION - One (1) vacancy with a three-year term to 10-01-05. (Appointed by two-thirds vote of the full Council) DUTIES: In addition to having jurisdiction of complaints involving any "city official", the duties of this commission are to prepare and publish pamphlets and other materials explaining the duties of individuals subject to the code of ethics; review all statements and reports filed with the city; annually review the code of ethics and make appropriate recommendations to the city council; review all public opinions related to the code of ethics that are issued by the city attorney; prepare and disseminate a report listing all campaign contributions and expenditures for each candidate within 30 days following the deadline for filing the last campaign finance reports for each city council election. The commission shall have such meetings as may be necessary to fulfill its responsibilities. The chairperson or any three (3) members may call a meeting provided that reasonable notice is given to each member. COMPOSITION: Nine members appointed by a two-thirds vote of the full council. Nominations are to be solicited from a wide variety of professional and community organizations in the city but interested individuals may also submit their names for consideration. Initially, the terms of three members shall be one year, and the initial terms of another three terms shall be two years. The persons having such shorter terms shall be determined by lot. No holding over is permitted except as expressly provided in the code of ethics. The commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice-chairperson. MEMBERS TERM ORIGINAL APPTD. DATE Garry Bradford Rev. Dr. Raymond Kiser Rev. Derrick Reaves Fred Haley Harold R. Fredrickson Eduardo Hinojosa Captain Craig Reynolds Herbie Garcia, Jr. Gloria Perez 10-01-02 4-28-98 10-01-03 11-09-99 10-01-05 10-12-99 10-01-05 11-14-00 10-01-04 10-09-01 10-01-03 8-12-97 10-01-04 6-13-00 10-01-04 3-13-01 10-01-03 11-09-99 * Not seeking reappointment INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Kevin Betts Executive Director, Trinity Towers Retirement Community. Associate's degree fi.om Columbus State College. Certified Assisted Living Manager in Texas. 10-22-02.wpd, p. 1 Haysam Dawod, D.D.S. Jack Gordy Charles Irwin Roy Martinez Nancy Glenn Reynolds Michelle Thomas 10-22-02.wpd, p. 2 Dentist. D.D.S., U.T. Health Science Center, Houston, TX; B.S. from Corpus Christi State University. Community activities include: C.C. Evening Rotary Club (Past President), volunteer Dentist for Clinica Corpus Christi - Guatemala, graduate of Leadership Corpus Christi XXIX and member of the Leadership Alumni Coordinating Board. (10-14-02) Retired military. High school graduate plus one year at Del Mar College. ($-22-01) Retired Professor of Management, Texas A&M- Corpus Christi. Ed.D., Business Administration. Served as the Campus Ethics Advisor for TAMU-CC. Volunteer activities include serving as Civic Club President and former President of Pharaoh Valley Neighborhood Assoeiatinn. (7-03-01) Letter Carder, U.S. Postal Service. Member of American Legion, G.I. Forum, Disabled American Veterans, and National Association of Letter Carriers. Has been recognized by the Postal Service for customer service. (11-02-99) Assistant Professor in the College of Education, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi. Doctorate of Education f~om Baylor University; M.S. in Education Administration & Foundations, Illinois State University. Created and now directs the ASCEN'i' program for non-traditional students. Serves on the committee that is writing the new state-mandated test for teacher certification. (9-25-02) Injury Prevention Coordinator, Driscoll Children's Hospital. B.S. in Kinesiology/Health Education, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi. Community and professional activities include: Vice-Chair, Corpus Christi Youth Alcohol Awareness Coalition; charter member of Safe Communities; member of Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council on Travel. A.N.M. Waheeduzzaman Elaine A. Yellen Recipient of the 2001 Texas Department of Health EMS Citizen Award for developing the Keep Your Kids Safe (KYKS) program. (8-22-02) Associate Professor of Marketing, Texas A&M- Corpus Christi. Ph.D. in Business Administration, Kent State University; M.B.A. in International Business, George Washington University; B.A. in Marketing, Dhaka University, Bangladesh. Recipient of Distinguished Teacher Award from the University of New Haven. Member of the American Marketing Association, Academy of International Business and Alpha Mu Alpha (AMA honor society). (9-28-01) Assistant Professor of Nursing, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Ph.D. in Nursing. Active volunteer with St. Bartholomew's Church. Member of Texas Nurses Association- local chapter. (9-20-01) lO-22-02.wpd, p. 3 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - One (1) vacancy with term to 6-14-03 representing the category of Youth commissioner (not more than 20 years of age at time of appointment). (Mayoral appointment subject to confirmation by Council) DUTIES: To study problems of group relationships within the City, and to devise and recommend to the Mayor and City Council ways and means of discouraging and combating prejudice, intolerance, and bigotry in all groups in their relations with one another; to discover all practices and policies calculated to create conflicts and tensions, and to recommend ways and means of eliminating any unfair or unjust discrimination by or against any person or group. Recommendations may be presented to the Mayor and City Council directly by the Committee or it may instruct the Human Relations Administrator to present them to the City Manager. COMPOSITION: Sixteen (16) members, 14 of whom shall be appointed by the Mayor with approval of the Council to study problems of group relationships within the City; one who shall represent the selling of dwellings, one who shall represent the renting of dwellings and one member of the staff of the Legal Aid Society to serve continuously, and three (3) shall not be more than 20 years of age at time of appointment serving one-year terms. Eleven (11) members shall serve three-year terms. The Chairperson of the Committee for Persons with Disabilities shall serve as an ex-officio voting member. MEMBERS TERMS ORIGINAL APPTD. DATE Oscar Hinojnsa, Sr., Chairperson 6-14-05 Sylvester Peterson, Vice-Chairperson 6-14-05 Amy Rhoads 6-14-04 Nancy Vera 6-14-03 Laura Aguifiaga 6-14-03 Dr. Gustavo Valadez Ortiz 6-14-03 Ruth Silva 6-14-05 Richard Johnson 6-14-05 Smart Elovitz, M.D. 6-14-04 Joey Maldonado (Selling Dwellings) 6-14-03 Betty Black (Renting Dwellings) 6-14-04 Karleen Engel (Youth) 6-14-03 Stephanie Saenz (Youth) 6-14-03 * Wendy Lai (Youth) 6-14-02 Crystal Lyons (Comm. Pets. Disab. Chair) Ex-officio (Voting) Errol Summerlin (Legal Aide Society) Continuous 5-11-99 12-08-98 7-10-01 7-10-01 2-13-01 2-12-02 2-12-02 7-10-01 9-19-00 7-11-00 7-10-01 8-20-02 7-10-01 * Not seeking reappointment 10-22-02.wpd, p. 4 INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Dina Abdelsamad Senior, Ray High School. Ranked 7th out of 476 students in her class. Professional and community activities include: part-time sales associate at American Eagle Outfitters; Key Club secretary; varsity basketball player and active in Youth Government. (Youth) (10-02-02) Erica Alatorre Senior, King High School. Community activities include: Senior Council president, German Club principal representative, German Honor Society principal representative and Girl Scouts. Special awards include: named to District Choir in 9th and 1 lth grades, superior rating in Solo and Ensemble, state recognized rating at Texas Solo and Ensemble in 1 lth grade and member of Who's Who Among American High School Students. (Youth) (9-27-02) Matthew Almaguer Senior, Moody High School. Activities include: Student Council Vice-President, Boys State Representative and recipient of scholarship from LCLAA. (Youth) (10-07-02) Mary Helen Salazar Owner, SS Structure, Inc.; Co-Owner, S & S Painting & Drywall Company. Associate's degree in Marketing, Del Mar College. 1999 President of LULAC Council No. 1. Past member of Minority Contractors Council and Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. (2-01-00) Neil Smith Senior, RayHigh School. Activities include: member of the Temple Youth group, Texas Sailing Association Youth Circuit Regattas, Junior Vice Commodore at the Corpus Christ Yacht Club. Awards include: Texas Trig-Star Champion in 2001 and recipient of a National Merit Letter of Recognition. (Youth) (6-11-02) Lynne Van Gould Case Manager, Metro Ministries. Holds a Texas Certificate in Case Management. Community activities include: President of Dress for Success, former member of Homeless Issues Partnership and 10-22-02.wpd, p. 5 JessicaWatkins HUD Work 2001 Advisory Council. (6-27-01) Senior, Calallen High School. Activities include: secretary of the CHS Interact Club, National Honor Society, President of Young Democrats, Senior Class President, and District/Regional Choir Member for four years. (Youth) (10-04-02) 10-22-02.wpd, p. 6 3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Equipment October 22, 2002 Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Digital Video Recording AGENDA ITEM: A. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute purchase of a Digital Video Recording System for a total cost of $31,889 from Chubb Security Inc. for the CCIA closed circuit terminal system. Funds are available in the FAA Security Compensation Grant No. 3-48-0051-33-02. ISSUES: Analog recording has inherent problems when recording over a 24-hour period, producing poor quality video. This situation presents major difficulties when it is required to identify small objects, such as weapons or individual identifying characteristics of persons passing through Check Point. Since 9/11 it has become critical to obtain quality video of security sensitive areas. The use of Digital Video Recording equipment allows quality videos to be produced. The Federal Aviation Administration has approved paying for 100% of this Project so that CClA will have the capacity to digitally store the recordings of 32 cameras for up to 45 days FUNDING: Funding is available for this equipment in FAA Security Compensation Grant No. 3-48-0051-33-02. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the Motion as presented. ~ave /4) r PTamrick /' ! Date Director of Aviation ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Exhibit A. Background Information EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND INFORMATION October 22, 2002 BACKGROUND: Currently the Airport is scheduled to install two analog video recorders in the terminal project to record 20 cameras. One of these recorders will be dedicated to one of the new Security Check Point cameras and the other is scheduled to record all other cameras. Replacing the analog equipment with Digital Video Recording equipment will allow quality videos to be produced and retained. In addition, DVR allows simultaneous reviewing of videos and continued recording of all monitored cameras. Analog recordings require the use of the recording device to view, where as DVR is viewable by any device with compact disk capability or any personal computer attached to our network. This system will provide room for expansion of hard drives and will allow for additional IPS and storage space. PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS: None FUTURE COUNCIL ACTIONS: None BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Airport Board recommended approval of this purchase on October 2, 2002. Exhibit A I Page 1 4 AGENDA MEMORANDUM RECOMMEDATION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an agreement with DataSeek Corp., San Antonio, Texas, to purchase Oracle 9i Standard Edition database software based on the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for $54,929.97 including first year maintenance. The term of this contract will be for thirty-six months. This database software will be used to support multiple enterprise-wide applications. Funds have been budgeted in MIS in FY02/03. Purpose: The City is using Oracle 8 database software for its major applications, PeopleSofi Human Resources/Payroll, PeopleSofi Financials, Maximo Computerized Maintenance Management System, M4 Fleet Maintenance system, and Graphical Information Systems (GIS). Since Oracle began offering version 9i, one-by-one these applications have started taking advantage of this new database version. As each application progresses through its enhancement cycle it will only be the 9i version that is enhanced. This contract will enable the City to move forward with Oracle's version 9i Standard Edition and continue using version 8 as needed until it is phased out. Purchasing Oracle 9i will enable the City to take advantage of Oracle's new pricing structure, which will result in lower annual maintenance costs. All applications using Oracle will be nm from one database server specifically configured for this purpose. This will reduce the annual maintenance costs and allow for easier resolution of problems. Award Basis: The contract is awarded to DataSeek Corp., a qualified information services vendor (QISV) that operates under the Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program. Price Comparison: The City currently spends, on average, $37,000 annually for maintenance costs. Under Oracle's new pricing structure this will reduce to approximately $12,000 each for years two and three. Funding: MIS 530160-5210-40470 $54,929.97 Procurement & General Services Manager 5 AGENDA MEMORANDUM RECOMMEDATION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an agreement with DataSeek Corp, San Antonio, Texas, to lease purchase two (2) HP rp7410 servers based on the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for $293,088.78 (including Shipping and Handling). This price includes a rebate of $36,800 as trade up. To be eligible for this rebate, the City must return the current servers within 90 days of shipment or the price will change to $329,888.78. Financing will be provided through the City's agreement with Bank of America and the term of the lease purchase will be thirty-six (36) months. The two servers will be used as Data Base and Application servers to support multiple enterprise-wide applications. Funds have been budgeted in MIS in FY02/03 and will be requested for all subsequent years. Purpose: The City is currently using three (3) HP UNIX servers for its major applications, PeopleSofi Human Resources/Payroll, PeopleSoft Financials, Maximo Computerized Maintenance Management System, M4 Fleet Maintenance system, and Graphical Information Systems (GIS). The Applications reside on one server, the Data on another and the third is being used to test new dam layouts as well as upgrades of the applications. Applications are often improved and these upgrades demand more of a server, its memory and processor speed. Two of the servers were purchased during 1998 and the third during 2000. The two older servers have reached the end of their economical life and are not performing adequately in this new environment. This contract will enable the City to move the production Data and Applications from the two older servers to the new HP rp7410 servers while keeping the third server for test purposes. Award Basis: The contract is awarded to DataSeek Corp., a qualified information services vendor (QISV) that operates under the Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program. Price Comparison: The City paid approximately $225,000 in 2000 for a similar server. The price reduction can attributed to the fact that the City deployed a Storage Area Network and the servers therefore do not need attached storage. Funding: MIS - 530160-5210-40470- $65,000 Michael Barrera, C.P.M. Procurement & General Services Manager CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Summary of Lease Purchased Equipment - August 1, 2002 Monthly Beginning Department/ Payment Payment Schedule Number Qty. Equipment Description Amount Cost Date BANC OF AMERICA Total Principal Total Total Term Interest & Interest over Payments Payments (Mos.) Rate Lifeof FYE 7/11/2003 FYE 7/31/2004 Outstanding Payment 11/01/02 MIS 2 His Servers 8,452.73 es[. 290,000.00 1/1/2003 est. est. 36 3.15% es[. est. 304,298 est. 59,169 est. !0!,433 est. 304,298 est. Bane of America Subtotal 1 8,452.73 1 290,000.00 304 298.46 1 59,169.11 1 101,432.76 1 304 298.28 10/14/2002 H:FirvM6Sharecft shrug, LLeasa\Summary of Lease Purchased Equipment 1 of 5 8go AM 10/1A/02 10:3S '~ ~002/009 DAT Date: Monday, October 14, 2002 RE: HP rp7410 UNIX Systems with Tradeup Rebate There are 2 I-IP quotes attached to this document. These configurations have been reviewed by Hewlett Packed and accepted by City of Corpus Christi as presented here. Quote 1 = The I-tP Database Server = $152,920.58 Quote 2 = The I-IP Application, Web & Batch Server ~ $140,168.20 Final Total -- $293,088.78 This price is contingent upon receiving a P.O. from the City of Corpus Christi by 10/25/02, and provided that Hewlett Packard continues its Tradeup program for K & D systems. By utilizing HP's Tradeup program Dataseek can rebate $36,800 to the City for the (2) K and (2) D currently installed systems, which will be traded in. This rebate is reflected in the above pricing. This program expires 10/31/02. The City must return the currently installed K & D systems to HP's designated carder within 90 days of shipment of the new systems. Otherwise the rebate will not be issued and the Final Total will change to $329,888.78. In this event the City agrees to immediately issue a Purchase Order to Data Seek in the aaaaount of $36,800, who will promptly invoice the City in that amount_ Agreed: Data Seek Corporation City of Corpus Christi By: By: B~l/Oo~hty -(~annel Mgr /~-14-o~ ,. Date Date 422 E. Ramsey, San Antomo, IX 78216 Website: www. dataseekonline.com * Toll Free: 1-800-880-0202 Phone: 210-308-0202 · Fax: 210-308-0255 H N n 0 .ti Date: October B, 2002 To: From: 11.. ......... ..:.......:.......... :... Jim Russell Steven Milletts Af"`�4 r, ,r.«rN:rar.6rxsY;K+t�r City of Corpus Christi Dabseek Database Server 361-5803751 210-30SM02 x 347 Qty Prod * Description List Price 1 A6752A HP server rp7410 Solution $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2 A6435A 875MHz PAB700 CPU, 2 pack $44,000.00 $88,000.00 2 A6435A 061 Factory integrated $0.00 $O. DO 2 A8094A Call Board, Processor and Memory $7,000.00 $14,000.00 2 AM94A 001 Factory integrated $0.00 $0.00 1 A6793A Core UO for HP server rp7410 $2,000.00 $2,00D.00 1 A6793A 001 Factory integrated $0.00 $0.01) 1 AGO97A 2GB High Density SyncDRAM Memory Mod $12,000.00 $12,000.00 1 A0097A 001 Factory Integrated $0.00 $0.00 4 A6723A LP 1808 HotPlug Ukre2 SCSI disk drive $1,764.00 $7,056.00 4 A9723A 001 Factory Integrated $0.00 $0.00 1 A61 BOA DVD drive for HP server $480.00 5460.00 1 A61 BOA 001 Factory integrated $0.00 $0.00 2 A679M PCI 20B Fibre Channel Adapter $2,240.00 $4,480.00 2 A6795A 0D1 Factory Integrated 30. DO $D.00 2 A482BA I000BsseSXPCI LAN Adapter $2,135.00 $4,270.00 2 A4928A ODI Factory integrated $0.00 $13.00 2 A5386A PCI HyperFahrWfberadapter $4,590.00 39,18D.00 2 A8386A ODI Factory integrated $0.00 $D.00 1 J153DAZ Factory Integration Rack Kit forrp7410 $460.00 $460.00 1 J 153DAZ AW 4 2D0.240 volts North America $0.00 $0.00 4 B9090AC HP -UX Enterprise 0ELTU1CPU w/system $5,355.00 $21,420.00 1 B7993M HP -UX Enterprise OE Server Media $0.00 $0.00 1 37993AA UM9 HP -UX version 111 $0.00 $0.00 1 87993AA AAF CD-ROM (disk only) $520.00 $520.00 1 87993AA 001 Factory integrated $195.00 $196.00 1 B7993PA ABA U.S. - English localization $0.00 $0.00 1 63901BA HP C/ANSI C Developer Bundle Server LTU $0.00 $0.00 4 B3901 BA 2AH Single processor license $816.00 $3,264.00 1 B3901 BA OD1 Factory integrated $0.00 $0.00 1 B8843CA HP -UX Workload Manager LTU, HP 9000 $0.00 $0.00 4 BBB43CA 2AH Single processor license $2,346.00 $9,384.00 i B6B43CA 001 Factory integrated $0.00 $O.OD i B6843CA ABA U.S. - English localization $OA0 $C. OD W O O C O 1 C2303B SCSI Cable 2.5m VHDTS881HDTSSS MIM Multi $335.00 C2363B ODI Fac integrated$� toryower 1 A5137AZ Modular power Dost Unit for std racks $0.00 $0.00 1 A5137AZ AW4 200 - 240 volts North America $145.00 $145.00 1 C74B9A HP SureStore DAT24 Array Module $ 84.00 $84,00 1 C2364A SCSI Terminator LVD/SE NDT868 Muldmd $1,$91.00 $1,591.00 2 C7625A Fbr Optic Cable 16m LC Duplex SOf125 M!M $100.00 $260.00 $100.00 1 H4406A 24x7 System Support, PhonelUpdates $520.(MI 1 H4406A OBC Manuals on CD-ROM $000 $43.0D 1 H4405A 455 Support- HP Sureft DLT1, DAT40124 Diva $0.00 $156.00 $OAO 1$0 $.00 $104.00 4 H4405A 6A5 Support - Server SW Applications $276.00 $ 2 H4405A SBB Support-rP7410frp8400 CPU$,2pack $1,188.00 $2,376.00 1 1 H4405A SB1i Support - rp7410 Server $2 13700 $2.13700 H4405A 6H2 Support- Server SW Applications $72$72- 00 4 H4405A 6M2 Support - Enterprise OE per processw $ 00 00 $1, $72$72.00 1 H4405A AAF CD-ROM (disk only) $000 $000 1 H4725A Installation -System and Network 0.00 $ 1 H4725A 596 Installation - Tape Drive $1$0.00 $ 0.00 $1$0.00 15 kth-8400.4gb Kingston memory $1,600.00 $24,000.00 $109,325.00 $225,739.00 Discount ,$55,438-42 Total $170,299,58 HP Tradeup rebate after $yet&= received by HP Rebate -$18,400.00 Subject to change as of 1U31!02 $151,899,58 S&H $1,021.00 Grand Total $151,920.68 Dataseek Represardative Date City of Carpus Christi Represerwive -Date m n 0 o I 0 o o Date: October 8, 2002 Te: From: Jim Russell StevenMillette .wW*?zxfi "Wfnr.,rasifsL?;: City of Carpus Christi Dataseek 381-880-3751 210-308-0202 x 347 Application, Web $ Batch Server City Prod p Oesorfptlos List Price Ext 1 2 A6752A A8435A HP server rp7410 Solution $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2 AB435A 876MHz PA670X CPU, 2 pack $� $66,000.00 001 Fact integrated 2 A6094A Bo Prose Cell Board, Processor and Memory $0,00 $0.00 2 A6094A DDI Facto Factory integrated $7 000 $14,0$0.00 1 A8793A Core YO for HP server rp741D $0.00 $0.00 A8793A OD1 Factory ry integreted $2 00 00 $2,00001 1 A6097A 2GB High Density SyncDRAM Memory Mod $0.00 $12,000.00 $0.00 1 A6097A OD1 Factory integrated $12,000.00 2 A6723A LP 16GB HotPiug UIha2 SCSI disk drive $0.00 $0.00 2 A5723A ODI Factory integrated $1,784.00 $3,52A.00 1 A6180A DVD drive for HP server $O. DD $0.00 1 A6180A OD1 Facto integrated 13 r 9 $460-00 $460.00 2 A8795 PC[ 213B Fibre Channel Adapter $0.00 $0.00 2 A6A OD1 Factory Integrated $2,240.DD $4,480.00 A4924826A 10X08aseSX PCI LAN Adapter $0,$0.001 1 A4928A ODI Factory integrated 52,135.00 35.00 $2,135.00 2 A5385A PCI HyperFebric2 fiber adopter $0'0D $0.00 2 A6386A ODt Factory Integrated $4.990.OD $9,180.00 1 J1530AZ Factory Rack Kit for rp7410 $0.01) $0.00 1 J1530/1Z AW4 volts 200 - 2400 moltlts s North Ameri o ca $460.00 $480,00 i ; 6909DAC HP -UX Enterprise OE LTU t CPU w/ system .00 $0$0.00 $ 0.00 87893AA HP -UX Enterprise OE Server Media $5,3 $21,4$0.00 1 87993AA UM9 HP -UX version Ili $0.00 20.00 1 B7993AA AAF CD-ROM (disk only) $0 -XO $0 .00 (Q 1 87SSSAA OD1 Factory integrated $ 00 85$000 1 B7993AA ABA U.S. - English localization $196.00 $195.00 I J14793 120 Lb. BeBast Kit 000 $$0..00 0.00 $$0.00 m 1 029636 SCSI Cable 2.5m VHDTSMHDTS88 MIM Multi 83 83 1 C23628 001 Factoryintogreted $335.00 $335.00 � 1 A5137AZ AW4 200.240 wlffi North America $0.00 894.00 80-00 1 C7498A HP SureStore DAT24 Array Module $1,591.00 $94.00 $1,591.00 w 1 C2364A SCSI Terminator LVD/SE HOTS68 Murdmd $100.00 2 C7525A Fbr Optic Cable 1 Bm LC Duplex SD/125 MIM $260.OD $100.00 $520.00 o ' i �i1�' ti n 0 .ti 1 H4405A 24x7 System Support, Phone/Updates $0.00 $0.00 1 H4405A OBC Manuals on CD-ROM $0.01) $0.00 1 H4405A 455 Support - HP SureStr DLT1, DAT40124 Drvs $156.00 $156.00 4 H4405A 6A5 Support- Server SW Applications $278.00 81 104 00 2 1444050k 69B Support -rp7410frp840D CPUs. 2pack $1,188.00 $2,376.00 1 H4405A BBH Support -rp7410Server $2,f37.00 $2,137.00 4 H4405A SM2 Support -✓=nterprias0Eper processw $625.00 $2,500.00 1 H4405A AAF CD-ROM (disk only) $0.00 $0.00 1 H4725A InstaIleEon - System and Network $0,00 $0.00 1 H4726A 506 Installation - Tape Drive $180.00 518000 15 k&-8400-4gb Kingston Memory $1,600.00 $24,000.00 $106,611.00 $208,821.00 Uscount -$51,237.80 Total $157,583.2D HP Tradsvp rebate after HP reclaves Equlpmsnt -S18,400.00 Subject to change as of 10131!02 $139,183.20 ' S&H $985.00 Grand Total $140,168.20 Dataseek Representative Daft: City of Corpus Chrisit Representative - Date 6 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the purchase of two (2) custom fabricated air handling units (AHU) from South Texas Equipment, Inc., San Antonio, Texas, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0018-03, based on low bid meeting specifications for a total amount of $38,800. This equipment is for the One Stop Development Center located at 2402 Leopard. Funds have been budgeted in the Engineering Department in FY02-03. BACKGROUND: Purpose: The equipment is necessary to operate the HVAC system for the One Stop Development Center. Air handling units provide the necessary return air circulation to cooling and heating equipment and distribution air to occupied spaces. Bid invitations Issued: Three Bids Received: Three Award Basis: Low Bid Meeting Specifications Temtrol, c/o Mechanical Representative, Inc., San Antonio, Texas submitted the apparent low bid; however their lead time for this equipment is eight (8) weeks after receipt of order. The air handlers units are needed on-site on or about November 25, 2002. Due to the urgency of the delivery of this equipment, the recommended supplier, South Texas Equipment Co., San Antonio, Texas, would meet the time line schedule for project completion· FundIng: Facility Management & Maintenance 550010-5110-40305 $38,800 ra~ · ement and Gene~anager CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BID TABULATION BID INVITATION NO. BI-0018-03 AIR HANDLING UNITS BUYER: ESTHER C. BARRERA ITEM VENDOR QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TEMTROL CiO MECHANICAL REPS, INC. SAN ANTONIO, TX. MFG: TEMTROL MODEL: AHU-6 MODEL WF-DH-22 AHU-7 MODEL WF-BTZ-12 LEAD TIME: 8 WEEKS 2 EACH 1 SOUTH TEXAS EQUIPMENT, INC. 2 EACH SAN ANTONIO, TX MFG: THERMAL MODEL: CLP-211 H MLT-121 HZD LEAD TIME: 2-3 WEEKS 2 TEXAS AIR PRODUCTS 2 EACH SAN ANTONIO, TX MFG: AIRZONE INTERNATIONAL MODEL: HDT LEAD TIME: 3 WEEKS $13,273.50 $19,400.00 $22,300.00 (*) $26,547.00 ~38~800.00 $44,600.00 (*) Temtrol, c/o Mechanical Representative, Inc., San Antonio, Texas submitted the apparent IOW bid, however their lead time for this equipment is eight (8) weeks after receipt of order. The air handlers units are needed on-site on or about November 25, 2002. Due to the urgency of the delivery of this equipment, the recommended supplier, South Texas Equipment Co. San Antonio, Texas, would meet the time line schedule for project completion. 7 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving supply agreements with the following companies, for the following amounts, for approximately 2,106 gas meters in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0076-02 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of$116,703. The terms of the contracts will be twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. These meters will be used by the Gas Department. Funds have been budgeted by Gas Department in FY 02-03. National Meter, Inc. Actaris US Gas, Inc. McGinnis Industrial Sales, Inc. Lancaster, OH Owenton, KY Houston, Tx Bid Item 1 Bid Items 2, 3 Bid Items 4, 5, 6 & 7 Total: $66,000 Total: $9,205 Total: $41,498 Grand Total: $116,703 BACKGROUND: Purpose: The Gas Department installs these meters to record the amount of natural gas used by customers. These meters will be used in new service installations as well as replacements. Bid Invitation Issued: 13 Bids Received: 4 Previous Contract: The option to extend the previous contract had been exercised, requiring the receipt of new bids. Price Analysis: Pricing, in the aggregate, has remained stable since the last contract of 2001. Award Basis: Low bid Funding: Gas Department M~chaelXl~arrera ~, // Procurement and General Services Manager 520150-4130-34130 $130,000 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: GABRIEL MALDONADO BID TABULATION BI -0076-02 Diaphragm Gas Meters 09/30/02 Award Total: Grand Total: $116,703.00 $66,000.00 $9,205.00 $41,498.00 National Meters, Inc. Lancaster, OH Actaris US Gas, Inc. Owenton, KY McGinnis Industrial Sales Houston, TX Gajeske, Inc. Houston, TX Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Item Description City. Price I Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 200 cu. Ft. meter, 1" Diaphragm Gas Meters 2000 $33.00 $66,000.00 $43.90 $87,800.00 $58.00 $116,000.00 $50.00 $100,000.00 2 300 cu. Ft. meter, 1 1/4" Diaphragm Gas Meters 50 No Bid 131.50 6,575.00 135.00 6,750.00 .312.32 15,616.00 3 400 cu. Ft. meter, 1 1/4" Diaphragm Gas Meters 20 No Bid 131.50 2,630.00 185.00 3,700.00 224.48 4,489.60 4 1,600 cu. Ft. meter, 1 1/2" Diaphragm Gas Meters 15 No Bid No Bid 675.00 10.125.00 804.00 12,060.00 5 3,000 cu. Ft. meter, 3" Rotary Gas Meters 15 No Bid No Bid 1,269.00 19.035.00 1,746.00 26,190.00 6 5,000 cu. Ft. meter, 4" Rotary Gas Meters 4 No Bid No Bid 1,837.00 7,348.00 1,893.00 7,572.00 7 10,000 cu. Ft. meter, 4" Rotary Gas Meters 2 No Bid No Bid 2,495.00 4,990.00 3,334.00 6,668.00 Award Total: Grand Total: $116,703.00 $66,000.00 $9,205.00 $41,498.00 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM Date: 10/22/02 AGENDA ITEM: A. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a grant from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council in the amount of $6,677.97 to be used for the purchase of equipment, supplies, and services associated with networking Corpus Christi Fire Department's stations· B. That a grant of $6,677·97 from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund to purchase equipment, supplies and services to network the Corpus Christi Fire Department stations and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council on Trauma (RAC) has forwarded the City a Grant in the amount of $6,677.97. This is a direct grant. No application was required. BACKGROUND: This is the third year that the RAC has distributed similar grants. Every EMS agency within the twelve county Coastal Bend area, who is actively participating in the RAC, is receiving funding based upon the number of trauma responses they make. The funds originate from the State Tobacco Trust Fund and are routed to the RAC through the Texas Department of Health. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: (may not be required) No future action is anticipated on this particular grant. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council motion to accept the grant and to appropriate the funds to the Federal/State Grants Fund to support the networking of the City's fire stations. · Ad~'~.lSru'e Chief ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING A GRANT OF $6,677.97 FROM THE COASTAL BEND REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES, AND SERVICES TO NETWORK THE CORPUS CHRISTI FIRE DEPARTMENT STATIONS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That a grant of $6,677.97 from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund to purchase equipment, supplies and services to network the Corpus Christi Fire Department stations. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of ,2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Legal form approved O~ · 7 James R. Bray, Jr. City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor ,2002 Lisa Aguilar Assistant City-Attorney 9 AGENDA MEMORANDUM October 22, 2002 SUBJECT: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation AGENDA ITEM: ,, Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to accept a modification to a grant from the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation for an additional $5,000 for a leak detection program. Ordinance appropriating $5,000 from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund to conduct a leak detection analysis on the City's water distribution system; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation awarded the City of Corpus Christi a grant for $20,500 in March 2002. The Bureau will award an additional ~$5,000 to conduct a leak detection analysis on the City's water distribution system. The Water Department will utilize the funds to identify hard-to-detect leaks in underground distribution water mains. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented. ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Background Information Contract Summary Ordinance/Resolution Map(s) [] [] [] [] Edu~rdo Ga,:aria I~. Water Superintendent BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Program Summary In March 2002, the City received a grant from the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation in the amount of $20,500 to purchase a water education program entitled "Learning to be Water Wise". The grant application is being modified to accept an additional $5,000 from the federal agency. The funds will be used to implement a water leak detection program. The Water Department maintains a leak detection program, which consists of responding to citizens' notification of visible leaks in the distribution system. The Water and Storm Water crews also perform preventative leak detection. Water crews utilize visual and probing equipment to identify leaks in transmission and service lines. Storm Water crews can detect infiltration of freshwater in the storm water drain lines and notify water department crews. The U. S. Bureau of Reclamation grant funds will be utilized to survey distribution system water mains in critical areas. The analysis will help to identify areas requiring rehabilitation. Expected Environmental and Cost Benefits: · Conserve water resources · Improve efficiency of the water distribution system · Prevent loss of revenue 7-2278 (4/90) Bureau of Reclamation UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLJ%MATION MODIFICATION OF ASSISTA/gCE AGREEMENT I t. MODIFICATION NUMBER I 2. EFFECTIVE DATE 002 I See Block 12 4. ISSUED BY Bureau of Recla/~ation Great Plains Region P.O. Box 36900 Billings MT 59107-6900 CODE GP-3800 7. RECIPIENT NAME AND ADDRESS City of Corpus Christi, Water Department P.O. box 9277 Corpus Christi TX 78469-9277 3. REQUISITION NUMBER 5. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA 6. FUNDING INFORFu%TION This Obligation 8. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT No: 02FG601635 GRANT Previous Obligation Total X Obligation Recipient BOR $. $ -0- $. S 251500 $ $ 25~500 Dated: 4/01/02 9. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF Reclamation Act Of June 17, 1902, and the Reclamation Reform Act Section 210a (43 U.S.C. 390jj). It modifies the above nu~nbered assistance agreement as set forth in Block 8 ~ DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION: Project Title: 2002 - 2003 Water Conservation Education Program, "Learning to be WaterWise" This modification extends the agreement period from Septe~ber 30, 2002 to Deceu~ber 31, 2003. This modification adds the following to the Statement of Work The City shall: 1. Utilize up to $5,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Federal funds for implementation of activities identified in the City's 1999 Water Conservation Plan. No cost-share required. 2. Provide a completion report to Reclamation docuraenting expenditure of funds by September 20, 2003. Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the docu/nent referenced in Block 8, as heretofore changed, remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 11. Acceptance of this Modification in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein is hereby made on behalf of NAME OF RECIPIENT BY SIGNATURE DATE TYPED NAME TITLE Attach additional signatures 12. Acceptance of this Modification in accordance with the terms and conditions herein made on behalf of the United States of America, Bureau of Reclamation BY SIGNATURE DATE Leatha Frost TYPED NAME TITLE Grants and Cooperative Agreements Officer {406} 247-7818 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $5,000.00 FROM THE U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND TO CONDUCT A LEAK DETECTION ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $5,000.00 from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund to conduct a leak detection analysis of the City's water distribution system. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure on this the day of ,2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: This 15th day of October, 2002: James R. Bray, Jr. City Attorney R. J,a~ R~ning / First AsSistant City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor R23746A1 .doc 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM: October 15, 2003 A. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the amount of $267,626 from the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, for funding eligible under the FY 2002 Law Enforcement Block Grants program and to execute all related documents. B. Ordinance appropriating $267,626 from the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance in the No. 1050 State and Federal Grant Fund to purchase law enforcement equipment for the Police Department; authorizing the transfer of $29,736 from the No. 1050 Law Enforcement Trust Fund to, and appropriating $29,736 in the No. 1050 State and Federal Grant Fund as the grant match. ISSUE: The Department of Justice provides funding opportunities each year in an effort to reduce crime and improve public safety through various methods, including the procuring of equipment, technology, and other material directly related to basic law enforcement functions. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Accepting the grant and appropriating the funds PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Approval to submit the grant on 07/09/02. FUNDING: The Law Enforcement Trust Fund has provided the matching funds each year. This year's match of $29,736 is budgeted in FY 02~03. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the grant and appropriating the funds. BACKGROUNDINFORMATION The Law Enforcement Block Grant program provides funding opportunities to reduce crime and improve public safety through various methods, including the procuring of equipment, technology, and other material directly related to basic law enforcement functions. Prior to the obligation of any funds received, the City must establish an advisory board to review the application and make nonbinding recommendations; additionally the City must hold at least one public hearing to make the public aware of the program and its proposed spending plan. The Advisory Board met on September 17, 2002 and approved the use of funds and the public hearing was held on October 03, 2002 The funds are dispersed by the Department of Justice on the basis of Part One offenses reported to the FBI through the Uniform Crime Report. The City reports a much larger number of Part One offenses as compared to Nueces County, thereby receiving a greater distribution of funds. The federal law provides for states to declare funding disparities if a political subdivision incurs more than 50% of the costs in a given county or prosecution and incarceration of Part One crimes. In the state of Texas, the Attorney General has determined that Texas counties are responsible for more than 50% of these costs and has certified this fact to the Bureau of Justice Assistance. With this certification, the City must share the $535,253 award with Nueces County. We have agreed to split the funds 50/50 with the County as we did in 1999, 2000, and 2001. The City funds will be used for the following: 10 unmarked vehicles SWAT equipment Laser Printers (3) Training equipment Surveillance equipment Lighting for Mobil Data Computers Computer software: Crime Analysis and Professional Standards Property Recovery Van Speed Monitoring Trailer Shotgun Racks (76) Riot Gear (100 shields/shin guards) 155,000 14,562 14,600 2,000 11,000 10,000 31,200 22,000 7,000 17,000 13,000 The Law Enforcement Block Grant (LEBG) program has provided a total of $3,144,908 in grant funds to the City since the program began in 1996. The funds have been used to purchase backbone equipment for the Mobil Data/Automated Vehicle Location project, 27 police package vehicles, 40 unmarked police units, digitized radios, radios for the Communications van, digital cameras, radars, video cameras, personal computer hardware and software, an upgrade to the computer system and the radio microwave system, a mobile police substation, a SWAT rescue vehicle, and other police equipment. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of the Director Washington, D,C. 20551 July 24, 2002 Mr. Gareia City Manager, Corpus Christi City P. O. Box 9277 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 RE: Fiscal Year 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program Dear Mr. Garcia: I am pleased to inform you that I have approved the application for funding under the Bureau of Justice Assistance's (BJA) Fiscal Year 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG) Program in the amount of $267,626 for Corpus Christi City. The purpose of the LLEBG Program is to reduce crime and improve public safety. This Block Grant Award may be used for any of the purpose areas described in the statute. Enclosed you will find the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents. If you have any programmatic questions regarding this award, please contact BJA's State and Local Assistance Division at (202) 514-6638. In addition, all financial questions regarding this award should be directed to the Office of the Comptroller, Customer Service Division at (800) 458-0786. I look forward to a continuing parmership with Corpus Christi City in fmlherance of this important criminal justice program. Sincerely yours, Richard Nedelkoff Director Attachments U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office for Civil Rights Wtmhlngton, D.C. 20531 July 24, 2002 Mr. Gareia City Manager, Corpus Christi City P. O. Box 9277 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 Dear Grant Recipient: Congratulations on your recent award. Because you have submitted Certified Assurances that your agency is in compliance with applicable civil fights laws, this office has determined that you have met this requirement in the Department of Justice regulations governing recipients of Federal financial assistance (see 28 C.F.R. sec. 42.204, Applicants' Obligations). As Director of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Office of Jnstice Programs, I would like to offer you my assistance in completing thc conditions of these Assurances, specifically Nos. 13, 14, and 15, as the grant goes forward. As you know, equal opportunity for the participation of women and minority individuals in employment and services provided under programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance is required by law. Therefore, if there has been a federal or state court or administrative agency finding of discrimination against your agency, please forward a copy of such order or consent decree, as required by Assurance No. 14, to OCR at the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Civil Rights, 810 Seventh Street, N.W., Room 8136, Washington, D.C. 20531. Additional Instructions For Grantees Receiving $$00,000 Or More: In accordance with Assurance No. 15, each grantee that receives $500,000 or more (or $1,000,000 in an 18- month period), and has 50 or more cmployees, must submit an Equal Employment Oppogunity Plan (EEOP)within 60 days from the date of this letter to OCR at the above address, t Alternatively, the grantee may choose to complete an EEOP Short Form, in lieu of sending its own comprehensive EEOP, and tatum it to OCR within 60 days of the date of this letter. This easy-to-follow EEOP Short Form reduces paperwork and preparation time considerably and will ensure a quicker OCR review and approval. The enclosed Seven-Step Guide to the Design and Development of an EEOP (which includes an EEOP Short Form) will assist you in completing this requirement. Please be reminded that the above requirements apply to primary grantees and to each of their subgrantees or contractors that meet the criteria outlined in this letter. Therefore, all primary grantees should apprise subgrantees of these responsiblities and those meeting the criteria should send their EEOPs or EEOP Short Forms directly to the Office for Civil Rights within 60 days of the date of their award. NOTE: If agency has under 50 employees, regardless of amouat of award, no EEOP is required; however, grantee must return applicable portion of Certification Form to OCR within 60 days. PURSUANT TO THE SPECIAL CONDITION REGARDING EEOPs GOVERNING THIS AWARD, RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE EEOP IS A VIOLATION OF ITS CERTIFIED ASSURANCES AND MAY RESULT IN SUSPENSION OF DRAWDOWN OF FUNDS UNTIL EEOP HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS. Additional Instructions For Grantees Receiving $25,000 Or More, But Under $500,000: Pursuant to Department of Justice regulations, each grantee that receives $25,000 or more and has 50 or more employees is required to maintain an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan (EEOP) on file for review by OCR upon request. (However, if the grantee is awarded $1,000,000 in an eighteen (18) month period, it must submit an acceptable EEOP to OCR.) Please complete the applicable section of the attached Certification Form and return it to OCR within 60 days oftbe date of this letter. NOTE: If agency has under 50 employees, regardless of amount of award, no EEOP is required; however, grantee must return applicable portion of Certification Form to OCR within 60 days. If you have already submiRed an EEOP as part of another award from the Office of Jued¢¢ Programs (OJP) of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) within this grant period, or if)~m have certified that no EEOP is required, it is not necessary for you to submit another at ~ time. Simply send a copy of the letter you received from OCR showing that your EEOP or certification is acceptable. Additional Instructions For Grantees Receiving Under $25,000: A recipient of under $25,000 is not required to maintain or submit an Equal Employment Oppormdity Plan (EEOP) in accordance with Assurance No. 15. No Certification is t~luired. Instructions for AH Grantees: In addition, aH recipients, regardless of their type, the monetary amount awarded, or the number of employees in their workforce, are subject to the prohibitions against discrimination in any funded program or activity. Therefore, OCR. investigates complaints by individuals or groups alleging discrimination by a recipient of OJP funding; and may ~luire all recipients, through selected compliance reviews, to submit data to ensure their services are delivered in an equitable manner to all segments of the service population and their employment practices are in compliance with equal employment oppotx'unity requirements. 2 If you have any questions, please call OCR at (202) 307-0690. Additional information and technical assistance on the civil fights obligations of grantces can be found at: hap://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/. cc: Grant Manager Financial Analyst Sincerely, Michael L. Alston Acting Director, Office for Civil Rights ~ Thc employment practices of certain lndian Tribes arc not covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. scc, 2000c. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ~USTICE AWARD OFFICE OF ~IUSTICE pRO(3R~MS ll~ ~ IU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AWARD CONTINUATION  OFFICE OF JUST[CE FROORAMS SHEET ~J [] BJS [] NU [] OVC [] COOPERATIVEAGREEMENT CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX PROJECT NUMBER: 2002-LB-BX-242T AWARD DATE 07t24/2002 SPECL41. CONDITIONS 1. The recipient agrees to comply with the financial and administrative requirements set forth in the current edition of the Office of .histice Programs (O.1P) Financial Guide. 2. The recipient agrees to comply with the orgamzafional audit requZrernents of OMB Circular, A- 133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Nen-Profit Organizations, as further described in OJP's Financial Guide, Chapter 19. 3. The recipient acknowledges that failure to submit an acceptable Equal Employment Opportunity Plan (if recipient is required to submit one pursuant to 28 CFR 42.302), that is approved by the Office of Civil Rights, is a violation of its Certified Assurances and may result in suspension or termination offending, until such time as the recipient is in compliance. 4. The recipient agrees that federal funds under this award will be used to supplement but not supplant state or local funds, pursuant to section 101(g) of H.R. 728, 104th Cong. (1995). 5. The recipient shall submit one copy of all reports and proposed publications resulting from this agreement twenty (20) days prior to public release. Any publications (written, visual, or sound), whether published at the recipient's or government's expense, shall contain the following statement: (NOTE: This excludes press releases, newsletters, and issue analysis.) *"l'his project was supported by Grant No. 2002-LB-BX-2427 awarded by the Bureau of .lustice Assistance, Office of Sustice Programs, U.S. DeparUunnt of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justiee." 6. The recipient agrees to provide information required for any national evaluation conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice. 7. The recipient agrees, if the funds are used for the hiring and employing of new, additional law enforcement officers and/or support personnel, as described in the applicable purpose area of Subpart A section 10 l(aX2) of H.R. 728, 104th Cong. (1995), that the recipient unit of local government will achlevc a net gain in the number of law enforcement officers who perform non-administrative public safety service. If the funds arc used for the hiring and employing of new, additional law enforcement officers and/or support p~rsennel, the unit of local govenununt will establish procedures to give members of the Armed Forces who, on or after October 1, 1990, were or are selected for involuntary separation (as described in section 1 ]41 of Title 10, United States Code), approved for separation under section 1 l?4a or 1175 of such title, or retired pmsuant to the authority provided under section 4403 of the Defense Conversion, Ralnvestment, and Transition Assistance Act of 1992 (division D of Public Law 102-484; 10 U.S.C. 1923 note), a suitable preference in the employment of persons as additional law enforcement officers or support personnel.  ~. u.s. ~)r~A~m~ oF Jus'r~cE AWARD GONTINUATION  OFF~ OF ~STtC£ ,'RO~MS SHEET CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX SPEC~L CONDITIONS CO~INUED 8. ~e ~ipient a~s ~is aw~ ~nt ~ns~mt~ ~ obli~on of fe~ ~ for u~ by ~e ~ipi~t in ~on of&e ~o~ or pmj~ cov~ by ~ aw~. Such ~ligation ~y ~ ~i~ted ~out ~ ~ if ~ ~ipimt ~ils to ~ i~ ~ly ufili~on of~e aw~ by a~fing the aw~ ~ s~cial con~fions ~&~ 45 ~l~ ~ ~m ~e ~te of aw~, 9. ~e ~ipient a~s to sub~t ~e R~uest for ~wdo~ v~ ~e lnt~et ~ wi~ 90 ~len~ ~ys ~om ~ of aw~, ~ to ~ve all ~ d~li~ ~r ~s~bution during ~e next ~ng cycle. 10. ~al ~ipi~ a~ to one 24 mon~ obli~tion ~d ~ndi~e ~ ~ es~blish~ at ~e ~pmval of the R~uest for ~wdo~. All ~ must ~ ex~n~ by ~e end of~is 24 mon~ ~fi~ wi~ no 11. ~ ~ipients ~ ~qui~ to ~blish a ~t ~d a~o~t. This ~d ~y not ~ ~d m pay debts inc~ by o~r ~fivi~es ~y~d the sco~ of~e ~1 ~w Enfom~ Bilk ~ ~, ~e ~ipient also a~es to ~ ~d ex.nd &e ~t ~n~ in the ~st ~d (including ~y interest e~) d~ng ~e 24 month ~, ~t ~ (~clu~ng ~y inter~t ~) not ex~n~d by the ~d of~e 24 month ~fi~ must ~ ~mm~ to ~u of J~ A~i~ (BJA) by the end of the 27~ month, along wi~ ~e fi~l sub~ssion of the Fi~i~ Sm~ ~n (SF-269A). 12. ~e ~ipi~t a~s ~ submit one ~1 pro~ ~ via ~e Interact s~tem at the end of ~e 24 month obligation ~d e~&~ ~dM. 13. ~e ~c~ient a~s, if ~ds ~ ~d by the ~ipient or submcipient for ~h~cing secure, that ~e recipient or ~br~ipi~t - - (a) ~ ~ ad~te p~ess to ~ss ~e ~pact of any ~ment ofa ~h~l s~ me~ ~at is un~ ~ ~b~ph ~) of ~fion 101(a)(2), on ~e inci~ ofc~e in ~e geo~phic ~a where the is ~; ~) will c~duct such ~ assessment with ms.ct to each such e~ancement; ~d, (c) will ~b~t to ~e B~au of Justice Assist~ce (BJA) ~ a~l assessment m~ via ~e Interact system. ~i~ ~,aa U.S. DEPARTME~T OF ~U ST[C£ AWARD CONTINUATION SPECIAL ~ND~IONS CON~NUED 15. ~ ~ipient a~s W ~ BJA in ~mpl~ng ~ ~c National En~m~en~ Poli~ Act ~PA) ~d o~ ~lated follow~ acti~fies ~11 ~ ~t~ m thc ~ of~e ~t ~ds. ~e ~ipi~t ~d~ds t~t ~ s~al con~tion to ~ ~d~en ~ or~r to ~ ~c~ ~t ~, ~is s~cial condition m~t fi~t ~ m~. ~e acti~fies cov~d by 2. Minor ~ovafion or ~el~g ofa pm~ either (a) list~ on or eligible for listing on ~c Nafio~l Re~st~ of 3. A ~ovation, lc~, or ~y pm~ ~e of a bull&rig or facili~ that ~1[ either (a) ~sult in a change in i~ b~ic ~or ~ or ~) si~ific~tly c~e its si~; ~ 4. Implantation of a new pm~ ~volving the u~ of che~cals o~cr ~ ch~i~s t~t ~ (a) ~ ~ ~ inci~ cornet of a ~cd acti~ ~d ~) ~&tio~lly us~, for ex.pie, ~ office, hou~hol~ r~a~o~l, or A~U~fion of~is S~ial Con&fi~ to Eccipient's Existing ~s or Ac~vifics: For ~y of~c ~ipi~fs or i~ sub~ipient's cxi~ng pm~s ~ a~fics ~t ~11 ~ ~d~ with ~c~ ~t ~, ~ ~ipient, up~ s~ific ~u~t ~m BJA, a~ to ~ with BJA in ~y p~p~tion by BJA ora ~fi~ or pr~ ~viro~enml ~m~t of~at ~ded ~o~ or activin, 16, ~e ~ipi~t a~s to en~ t~t the State lnfo~fion T~olo~ Point of Con.ct ~ccivcs ~Rcn notification ~ng nny info~tion tec~olo~ pmj~t ~ by ~is ~t d~ng ~e obligation ~d cx~n&~ ~fi~. ~is is to f~ili~te co~unication ~g 1~ ~d s~tc gov~l entities ~ng v~ous info~on t~olo~ ~cnting ~e m~ting of~is ~ui~mcnt, For a list of Smtc Info~ation T~hnolo~ Points of Con.ct, go to h~://~.ojp.~oj.gov/cc/smtcs.h~ 17. ~e ~ipicnt a~s to provide ~d ex.nd a 10 ~rccnt c~h match (calculated ~ 1/9 of thc federal awed ~o~t) ~fo~ thc end of~e 24 month obligation and cx~n&m~ ~. ~e ~ipicnt is ~mindcd ~at ~e ~tc~ng ~ds ~ au&robie ~dcr S~ial Con~on g2 ~d ~11 ~ bin&ng to ~c ~ipi~t. I ~ U.S, DEPARTMENT OF .'USTICE AWARD CONTINUATION  OFFICE OF ,IUSTICE FROGRAMS SHEET SPECI,'IL CONDITIONS CONTINUED 18. The recipient agrees that prior to the obligation or cxpon&ture of any LLEBG funds, at least one (1) public hearing will be held regarding the proposed use(s) of the gnmt flmds. The recipient must also provide verification to BJA, via the Interact system, of the public hearing. At the hearing, persons shall be given an opportunity to provide writtan and oral views to the recipient on the proposed use(s) of the grant funds. The recipient will hold the public heating at a time and place that allow~ and encourages public attendanee and participation. The recipient may not request a drawdown of funds until these requirements are met and the formal budget allocations are adopted by thc recipient. 19. Thc recipient agrees that prior to thc obligation or expenditure of any LLEBG funds, a previously designated or newly established advisory board will meet to discuss the proposed use(s) of thc grant funds. The recipient will designate the advisory board to make nonbinding recommendations on the use(s) of funds under thc LLEBG Program. Membership on the advisory board must include a representative flora the following, though it may be broader: a) thc local police department or sheriff's department; b) the local prosecutor's office; c) the local court system; d) thc local school system; and, e) a local nonprofit, educational, religious, or community group active in crime prevention or chug use prevention or ~eattnent. The recipient may not request a drawdowa of funds until these rcqniremcnts are met and thc formal budget allocations are adopted by the recipient. 20. The recipient has certified it is in compliance with the Public Safety Officers' Health Benefits Provision of thc Fiscal Year 2002, Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (Pub. L. No. 107-77) and agrees to remain in compliance during thc life of thc grant. This provision requires that thc unit of local government which employs a public safety officer (as defined by section 1204 of Title 1 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Stzcets Act of 1968, as amended) to afford such public safety officer who retires or is separated from service due to injury suffered as a direct and proximate result of a personal injury sustained in the line of duty while responding to an emergency situation or hot pursuit (as such terms are defined by State law) with the same or better level of health insurance benefits at the time of retirement or separation as thc officer received while employed by the jurisdiction. If the recipient demonstrates noncompliance during the life of the grant, 10 percem of the award amount must be returned to BJA. 21. Thc recipient agrees that funds provided under this award may not be used to operate a "pay-to-stay" prog:am in any local jail. The recipient further agrees not to subaward funds to local jails which operate "pay-to-stay" programs. OJP FORM 4000/2 (REV. 587) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE i ~ U.S.~EeA"T~.TO~JUST~CE AWARD CONTINUATION o~F~c~ OF ~UST~CE e.OOe*MS SHEET CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX ~OJE~ NUMBER: ~-L~BX-2421 AWA~ DATE ~hc~e l~m~dcs ~d ~e ~oval ~d ~e ~s~ of ~e che~s, ~m~L ~d w~t~ ~ in or ~fing ~m ~e o~tio~ of ~ b. S~cific R~uimmen~: ~e ~t~ ~d~ ~ a~ t~t ~y pm~ or i~fiative involving eith~ ~e i~fi~tio~ ~, or clos~ of cl~stine m~mph~e ~t~es, he~R~ gf~ to ~ the ~", c~ ~lt in adve~ h~, ~feW, ~d ~v~l i~ac~ to (l) ~e law ~fo~ement ~d o~ gove~l ~rso~el involve; (2) ~y ~si~, ~, u~, ~d nei~ of ~e si~ of a ~ cl~st~e ~rato~; (3) ~e ~ la~mto~ site's i~iate ~d s~o~ m~m~t; ~d (4) ~e ~e~ate ~d s~ding ~nv~o~ent of the sit~s) whe~ ~y r~a~ chemic~s, ~ui~enL ~d w~tes ~om a ~ized la~mto~s o~tio~ a~ pla~ or come to ~st. ~fo~, the ~tee ~her a~s ~at in order ~ avoid ~ mitigate ~e ~ssible adv~ he~, ~, ~d ~v~nmen~l ~pa~s of i~ ~o~, it will (I) include ~e ~e, ~low list~ ~t~five m~s ~ com~nents wit~ its Pm~; (2) provide for ~eir ad~te ~n~ng to ~clu~ ~ng, as ~y~d ~at pmvid~ by ~is ~t a~ent; ~d (3) ~plem~t ~e~ ~tective measu~s ~u~out ~e life of~is ~t a~ement. In ~ doing, ~e ~tee ~ds ~t it may impl~ent ~ese pmte~ve m~res~ctlyt~ough the~ofi~o~sources~ds~fformay~cure~eq~lifi~s~i~s of other agencies, con~ct~s, or o~ q~lifi~ third p~es. 1. ~vi~ ~cal ~mng of~o~el assi~ or to ~ ~si~ by ~e clos~e ofcl~g~e met~mphe~mine la~mtofies; 2. ~o~de ~cupational Safe~ and H~I~ A~s~tion (OS~) ~qui~ initi~ ~d g~ ~ing for law ~forcem~t o~cials ~d other ~el assi~ by ~e ~t~ to ei~ ~e ~i~ or ~e cl~ ofcl~sfine me~ph~ine la~mtofies; 3. As dete~ined by ~eir s~ific duties, equip ~nnel ~si~ to the ~og~ with OS~ r~d protective we~ ~d other ~i~ ~fe~ eq~pment; 4. Assi~ properly ~in~ ~o~el m prep~e a ~mpgh~sive ~n~inafion re~ on e~h clo~ la~; ~iI ~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AWARD CONTINUATION OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS SHEET CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX PROJECT NUMBER: 2002-L]~BX-2427 AWARD DATE 0//24/2002 SPECL4L CONDITIONS CONTINUED 5, Employ qualified disposal conU'actors to remove all chen~eals and aseociated glassware, equipment, and contaminated materials and waztes from the site(s) of each seized clandssfinc laboratory; 6. Dispose oftha chemicals, equipment, and contaminated materials and wastes removed from the sites of seized laboratories at properly licensed disposal facilities or, when allowable, properly licensed recycling facilities; 7. Monitor the ~nspor~, dispozal, and recycling componen~ of subparagraphs numbernd 5. and 6. immediately above in order to ensure proper compliance; g~ Have in place and implement an inter-agency agvsement or other form of cormmtment with a responsible state envh'onmental agency that provides for that agency's (i) timely evaluation of tbe environmental conditions at and around the site of a closest clandestine laboratory and (ii) coordination with theresponalble par~.y, propertyowner, orotherstoensurethatanyresidualcontanf~narionis remediated, if necessary, and in accordance with existing state and federal requirements; and 9. Include among the personnel involved in seizing clandestine methamphetamine laboratories, or have immediate access to, qnalified personnel who can respond to the potan~ia] health needs of any of the offende~(s)' children or other children present or living at the seized laboratory site. Response actions should include, at a minimum and az neecssary, ~king childscn ~nte protective custody, immediately testing them for methampbetamine toxicity, and arranging for any necessary follow-up medical tests, examinations, or health c. A~iirional Reqnirements: As part of the Request for Drawdown pro.ss, the Grantee shall submit a brief description of its project sufficient for thc Office of Justice Pcogxams (OJP) to determine whether any additional compliance with federal environmental statutes and regulations needs to occur prior to the issuance of LLEBG funds. Furthermore, once LLEBG funds are issued, the Grantee shall notif~ OJP iftha project changes siguificanfly from the description in the Request for Drawdown, or if siguificant new information is revealed during thc course of the expenditure of LLEBG funds so that O.IP can determine whether any additional environmental analyses need to be completed. OJP FORM 40(~/2 (REV. 587) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $267,626 FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND TO PURCHASE LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT; APPROPRIATING $29,736 FROM THE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST ACCOUNT IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND AS THE GRANT MATCH; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $267,626 is appropriated from the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund to purchase law enforcement equipment for the police department. SECTION 2. That $29,736 is appropriated in the Law Enforcement Trust Fund account in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund as the grant match. SECTION 3. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, .copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for unmediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of ,2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Legal form approved James R. Bray, Jr. City Attorney By: Lisa Aguilar~ Assistant City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor ~-~ ~,2002 11 AGENDA MEMORANDUM October 22, 2002 SUBJECT: Allison Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project: Award of Contracts for Biological and Chemical Monitoring Services AGENDA ITEM: a. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 4 to the contract for consulting services with the Center for Coastal Studies in the amount of $71,170 for Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wastewater Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 4 to the contract for consulting services with the Conrad Blucher Institute in the amount of $110,370 for On-Going Salinity Monitoring in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. ISSUE: The monitoring contracts must be amended to continue services for an additional 12 months. The Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requires five years of data prior to evaluating the effects of the discharge of the Allison Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project. The data will permit a determination of the project impact on primary and higher level productivity by measuring changes in the project area and nearby wetlands. FUNDING: Funds for these contracts are available in the Water Supply Development and Environmental Studies activities of the Water Department's FY2002-03 adopted Operating Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motions as presented. Eduardo Gara~a, P.E. Water Superintendent ~_g~C_,A, ngel R. Escobar, P. E. Director of Engineering Services Attachments: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Background/Summary of Contracts Prior Council Action Allison WWTp Diversion Demo Proiect -Mon or nq Contracts Page I of 1 H:\HOME\KEVINS\GEN\WATER~ALLISON\0102MONI\^AWARDMEMO.DOC Back,qroundlSummary, of Contracts SUBJECT: Allison Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project Award of Contracts for Biological and Chemical Monitoring Services PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: See Exhibit B. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTIONS: Council will be requested to approve amendments to address the Rincon Diversion Project monitoring and TCEQ reports with the Marine Science Institute of the University of Texas at Austin (UTMSI). TCEQ indicated a five-year monitoring period was required. It is anticipated that this amendment will be the final year of monitoring. The City is presently working closely with TCEQ to further refine the unified monitoring work program for the Rincon Diversion Project. That program could impact the monitoring requirements for the Allison Diversion project. The frequency and amount of future amendments will be based on the requirements of the Rincon Monitoring, and the level of monitoring required by Allison project, as determined by an annual assessment. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Biological monitoring of the Nueces Bay, Delta and Estuary is required by TCEQ to determine the effects of wastewater effluent diversion. This amendment represents the fifth year of biological monitoring. Each amendment provided for 12 months of chemical and biological monitoring to furnish data for the determination of the effect of wastewater effluent diversion on water and habitat quality. The data collected through these monitoring contracts will be combined with data previously collected by each of the institutions. The contracts are designed to provide a continuation ofthe specific research by each respective institution. This avoids duplication and allows each research institution to build on its existing research data. PROJECT OVERVIEW: Back,qround: The City's overall strategy for long-term water supply includes the optimization of the existing freshwater resoumes in the Nueces River Basin. The current operating plan for the Choke Canyon/Lake Corpus Christi reservoir system includes requirements to provide freshwater inflow to the Nueces Estuary that diminish the dependable water supply for the region. The City completed a two- phased planning study that recommended the potential beneficial re-use of wastewater effluents as a means of enhancing the productivity of the Nueces Estuary that may alleviate part of the need to provide fresh water from the reservoir system. EXHIBITA ] Page 1 of 3 Planning Studies: The planning studies indicated that wastewater return flows may, in fact, provide a greater degree of benefit in terms of productivity than release of stored water. By placing the treated effluents in the marsh systems of the Nueces Delta rather than puffing them directly into the water column of Nueces Bay, it is believed that significant increases in plant biomass and productivity will result. Measurements of primary productivity taken in the Nueces River, Delta, and Bay during both Phase I and II indicate that wastewater effluents could potentially provide a greater benefit to the estuary than a larger amount of freshwater releases. Allison W1/VTP Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project: The Nueces Estuary Regional Wastewater Planning Study, Phase II, resulted in the construction of a pilot project to divert treated effluent from the Allison VVVVTP to the Nueces River Delta. The Project, which became operational on October 1, 1998, uses alternative effluent discharge and dispersal methods. An evaluation of these methods, and the overall environmental benefits, must be completed prior to proceeding with the diversion of additional flows from other wastewater treatment plants owned by the City. Monitorinq: The biological and chemical evaluations being conducted will document the effects of wastewater effluent and freshwater diversions to the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. TCEQ requires that the effects of the discharge of the Project be monitored for primary and higher level productivity by measuring changes in biomass and growth rates of plant and animal communities in the Project area and nearby wetlandsl measuring salinity, inorganic and organic nutrients, dissolved and particulate trace metals, waterborne and bottom plankton, emergent vegetation, bottom invertebrates, and larval/juvenile fish and shellfish; monitoring for usage by water birds and small mammals; and toxicity testing of sediment and water. CONSULTANTS INFORMATION: The CCS, CBI, and UTMSI have conducted on-going biological and chemical monitoring in the Project area for the City or other agencies, such as the Corpus Christi Port Authority. As a result, these institutions are singularly qualified to continue the monitoring for the duration of the Project for the parameters established by the City and the TCEQ. The review and integration of their studies is the responsibility of Alan Plummer Associates. That contract included the development of the unified monitoring program for the Rincon Diversion with TCEQ. The Center for Coastal Studies. The CCS will provide ecological/biological monitoring and inspection monitoring of treated wastewater diversions iH the Nueces Delta, specifically measuring any changes to the bottom invertebrates, larval/juvenile fish and shellfish, and monitoring for usage by water birds. EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 3 The Conrad Blucher Institute. The CBI has been providing salinity monitoring as part of the TNRCC permit requirement for bays and estuaries through an annual contract with the City. There are now seven monitoring existing stations supporting the required data collection. Additional information, including biological oxygen demand, dissolved and particulate trace metals, chlorinated and polyaromatic hydrocarbons, toxicity testing results, and the wastewater discharge rates, all data normally collected as part of the Allison WWTP operations, are being provided by the City's Wastewater Department. I EXHIBITA J Page 3 of 3 PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS 1. April, 1991 and April 1992. Approval of participation with the Port Authority, Corpus Christi Board of Trade, and the Texas Water Development Board (including partial funding) in the Nueces Estuary Regional Wastewater Planning Study, Phase I in April, 1991 ($25,000 of $150,000) and Phase II in April, 1992 ($79,000 of $258,000). January, 1994. Approval of the Capital Improvement Program which included an Effluent Return Flows Pilot Project to evaluate the potential for meeting the requirement for water releases into the Bay Estuaries using wastewater diversion in lieu of freshwater releases. March 1, 1994. Award of a contract in the amount of $117,500 to the joint venture of Urban Engineering and Govind & Associates for engineering services associated with the construction of §n Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project (M94-051). September 26, 1995. Acceptance of an easement for a 28.109 acre effluent diversion site, a 1.019 acre pipeline easement, and a 25 foot wide temporary construction easement from Mr. O.S. Wyatt in connection with the Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project in return for the construction of a 2.5 inch water pipeline valued at $48,500 for livestock watering purposes (M95-284). October 15, 1996. Award of a contract in the amount of $18,850 to the Conrad Blucher Institute and the Center for Coastal Studies at Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi for continuous salinity monitoring in the Nueces Bay (M96-332) November 19, 1996. Award of a contract for consulting services with the Marine Sciences Institute of the University of Texas at Austin for Biological Monitoring of the Effects of Wastewater Effluent Diversions on Primary and Secondary Production in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay in the amount of $70,000 (M96- 348). April 8, 1998. Acceptance of an Access Easement valued at $15,000 from Mr. John S. McGregor for access over a 20-foot wide road for the purpose of constructing and operating a dispersal facility (M97-73). April 8, 1998. Award of contract in the amount of $825,621 with West Oaks Constructors, Inc. for construction of the Allison WWTP/Nueces Estuary Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project. November 24, 1998. Award of contracts for consulting services: a. in the amount of $52,500 with the Center for Coastal Studies (CCS) for L Exhibit B Page 1 of 3 10. 11. 12. bo Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wastewater Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M98-398); in the amount of $90,500 with the Conrad Blucher Institute (CBI) for On- Going Salinity Monitoring in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M98-399); and in the amount of $84,500 with the University of Texas Marine Sciences Effluent Diversions on Primary and Secondary Production in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. Institute (UTMSI) for Biological Monitoring of the Effects of Wastewater (M98-400). September 28, 1999. Award of Amendment No. 1 for consulting services: a. in the amount of $55,500 with the Center for Coastal Studies (CCS) for Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wastewater Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M99-337); b. in the amount of $85,784 with the Conrad Blucher Institute (CBI) for On- Going Salinity Monitoring in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M99-338); and c. in the amount of $93,484 with the University of Texas Marine Sciences Effluent Diversions on Primary and Secondary Production in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. Institute (UTMSI)for Biological Monitoring of the Effects of Wastewater (M99-339). October 10, 2000. a. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the contract for consulting services with the Center for Coastal Studies in the amount of $53,672 for Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wastewater Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M2000-360). b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the contract for consulting services with the Conrad Blucher Institute in the amount of $86,286 for On-Going Salinity Monitoring in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M2000-361). c. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the contract for consulting services with the University of Texas Marine Sciences Institute in the amount of $110,953 for Biological Monitoring of the Effects of Wastewater Effluent Diversions on Primary and Secondary Production in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M2000-362). Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract for consulting services with Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc., of Austin, Texas, in the amount of $45,920 for Analysis, Evaluation and Report Preparation required by Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission discharge permit related to the Wastewater Effluent Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay (M2000-363). October 23, 2001 -_Motion authorizihg the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a consulting contract in the amount of $104,500 with Alan Plummer I Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 Associates, Inc., for Nueces Delta Monitoring Program, Program Coordination, and Report Integration Services (Rincon Bayou Diversions) (M2001-402). 13. November 13, 2001 a. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 3 to the contract for consulting services with the Center for Coastal Studies in the amount of $71,170 for Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wastewater Diversions in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. (M2001-422) b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 3 to the contract for consulting services with the Conrad Blucher Institute in the amount of $87,470 for On-Going Salinity Monitoring in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. (M2001-422) c. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 3 to the contract for consulting services with the University of Texas Marine Sciences Institute in the amount of $173,664 for Biological Monitoring of the Effects of Wastewater Effluent Diversions on Primary and Secondary Production in the Rincon Delta and Nueces Bay. (M2001-423) l Exhibit B J Page 3 of 3 12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM Date: 10/22/02 AGENDA ITEM ISSUE: Amending Resolution No. 022938 to change membership of the Community Youth Development Advisory Committee from 18 to 11 voting members, with two voting positions filled by youth involved in the Youth Action Committee. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Any change in a resolution establishing membership of a City board or commission requires Council approval. PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: On 5/22/97 the Council passed a resolution establishing the Community Youth Development (CYD) Steering Committee as an ad hoc advisory committee of the City of Corpus Christi with 16 voting and 4 non-voting advisory members. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: none RECOMMENDATION: The CYD Steering Committee and Staff recommend total membership of the CYD Steering Committee be changed to 11 voting members, with two (2) of those positions filled by youth involved in the Youth Action Committee. All members of the CYD Steering Committee are appointed by the City Council. Daniel L. Whitworth, Director Park and Recreation Department ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Background Information Contract Summary Ordinance/Resolution CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM Additional Background Information BACKGROUND: In 1995, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (PRS) developed a program to fund local grass roots efforts in the highest juvenile crime areas of the state by ZIP Code. The program created activities that were not currently available within the 78415 ZIP Code area. These activities were made available to youth ages 17 and under. Eligible activities fall within the following categories: mentoring, education, activities, employment, and youth leadership. PRS is continues to fund the Community Youth Development (CYD) Program in the 78415 ZIP Code. A resolution passed on 5/22197 established the Community Youth Development Steering Committee to advise the City Council regarding the CYD Program. There were 18 voting and 4 non-voting advisory members established in this resolution. The CYD Steering Committee must have 51% of its members residing in the 78415 ZIP Code. There is also a very strict Conflict of Interest Policy for membership of the CYD Steering Committee. Due to the limitations of residence and the conflict of interest policy, it has been very difficult to keep membership at the established numbers. At this time, the number of members of this committee stands at 9 adults, with 5 members living in the 78415 ZIP Code. The Youth Action Committee (YAC) was established in the spring of 2000 to provide an opportunity for CYD eligible youth to develop leadership skills and participate in various community projects. Members of the YAC have attended a CYD Teen Summit each summer for the past three years. PRS now requires that two youth members of the YAC be appointed to the CYD Steering Committee. These youth will be full voting members of the CYD Steering Committee. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 022938 TO CHANGE MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMUNITY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM 16 TO 11 VOTING MEMBERS, WITH TWO VOTING POSITIONS FILLED BY YOUTH INVOLVED IN THE YOUTH ACTION COMMITTEE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Council amends Resolution No. 022938, as amended by Resolution No. 023058, to change the membership of the Community Youth Development Advisory Committee from 16 voting members to 11 voting members, with two of the voting members to be youth involved in the Youth Action Committee. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved this the James R. Bray City Attorney ~-t'~day of Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor (~' ,2002 13 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 2002 SUBJECT: Public Health Services AGENDA ITEM: An ordinance appropriating $225,377 from the unreserved balance in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund as State Fiscal Years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 Program Income to fund Environmental Health, Laboratory, and Nursing services for the period of September 1, 2001 through August 31, 2003. ISSUE: The Health Department receives funding from the Texas Department of Health (TDH) for various public health services. As a result of this support, fees that are charged must be prorated to determine the percentage of revenues that were generated using State/Federal funds. The State/Federal supported revenues are deemed Program Income (PI). PI eamed during the state fiscal (September 1 - August 31) must be spent during that year or returned to the state. PI earned is to be used to supplement local funds for public health services. Staff reviews actual earnings and projected earnings to recommend an annual appropriation to cover expenditures. Expenditures have included 50% salary and fringes for a Local Area Network (LAN) Administrator, clerical positions in Environmental Health, Laboratory & Nursing, laboratory and nursing supplies, communications equipment, and staff training. Planned expenditures for FY 2002-2003 includes salaries, fringe benefits, supplies, minor equipment, contractual services, training, and computer equipment for the environmental health, laboratory, and nursing programs. Additional PI of $19,677 was earned and obligated for expenditure during FY 2001-2002 (See Attachment A). Attachment B reflects PI earnings for FY 2001-2002 and projected eamings for FY 2002-2003 for a total appropriation request of $225,377. Budgeted expenditures are indicated on Attachment C for all activities. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize an appropriation of $225,377 for FY 2001- 2002 and 2002 -2003 Program Income. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the ordinance be approved to provide a continuation of public health services to our community. om, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Director of Public Health ATTACHMENT A CORPUS CHRISTI- NUECES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT REQUESTED INCREASE IN FY 2002 PROGRAM INCOME ALLOCATION FISCAL YEAR END AUGUST 31, 2002 Droclr~m Tubercolosis Lab Medicaid Total odginal program income estimate $28,000 $88,000 $96,000 actual Drooram irlcome $42,328 $73,350 $115,677 requested inc~pase $14,328 $5,350 $19,677 ATTACHMENT B CORPUS CHRISTI- NUECES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME FISCAL YEAR 2003 a b a/b calculation estimation fy 2002 fy 2002 fy 2002 fees fy 2003 fy 2002 pm;Imm proq inc prog inc % at 100% prof~ inc % pm.q inc family planning $ 1,983 31% $ 6,396 41% $ 2,000 immunization $ 4,714 61% $ 7,728 59% $ 4,700 std (est thru 12/31) $ 4,359 43% $ 10,138 42% $ 4,400 tb $ 42,328 100% $ 42,328 100% $ 50,000 environmental $ 63,996 16% $ 399,972 16% $ 61,000 labcha~jes $ 10,250 16% $ 64,064 16% $ 10,250 lab medicaid $ 73,350 100% $ 73,350 100% $ 73,350 total $200,979 $ 603,976 $ 205,700 ATTACHMENT C CORPUS CHRISTI - NUECES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT PROGRAM INCOME APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003 COUNTDESCRIPTION • ,� _• 111 I\ I■ 11 MEN111 111 r1 EI •111 11 / :. .- . -: .. .. :. ---� 11 11 111 11 I\ Ir lra ... : •c .. � ---� I/111 \111/ III 11 � 11111 11.1 . .. :. . I•I --- I ■ 11 111 \ • \ I I I 1 1 I - - - 11 ---� 11111 r11 11 111 I\ • SWIM •_ _ : I6/ ---� -�� Irl 11 11 \I 11\ 11 < \ I 1 •- e_ ��. _- `Gr111 --�� 'C 11 III Ir 1111 \1 1 :/ _: • _ -- - 11 1111• '11 ■1 . 11 MMIT 11-11, 111II r1 jjjjjjjjjjmaj11111 1111 111 ,1 •,.; y.-..: : a :-� •:� --- / \ M': 11 11 I I 1 - III / 1 •. 111 1 1 : • . - - - - ---_- •. • 111 11 111 11 III II W47 • - • -•' - - -- 111 11 11 • I r ---_-- 1111 � 11 /1 .J11 •� _ :• • . III ---- III 11 mmml 111 11 . I 1 1 •• • r : • • a I \ -urc ---- \I 11/I 11 11/ II 11\ I/ I 111 I I/ 111111 mmm1 1111 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $225,377 FROM THE UNRESERVED BALANCE IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND AS STATE FISCAL YEARS 2001- 2002 AND 2002-2003 PROGRAM INCOME TO FUND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, LABORATORY, AND NURSING SERVICES FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER l, 2001 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2003; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $225,377 is appropriated from the unreserved fund balance in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund as state fiscal years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 Program Income to fund Environmental Health, Laboratory, and Nursing services for the period of September 1, 2001 through August 31, 2003. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter role that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ,2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Legal form approved 0~C . James R. Bray, Jr. City Attorney Lisa Aguilar ~ Assistant City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor ,2002 14 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 22, 2002 SUBJECT: One Stop Development Center- Project No. 4267 AGENDA ITEM: a. Appropriating $508,880 from the Unreserved Fund Balance of the No. 3160 City Hall CIP Fund, Transferring to and Appropriating in the No. 5110 Maintenance Service Fund for the One Stop Development Center, with Intent to Reimburse the No. 3160 City Hall ClP Fund; Amending Ordinance No. 024974 which Adopted the FY 2002-2003 Operating Budget by Increasing Revenues and Appropriations by $508,880 each; Amending Ordinance No. 024730 which Adopted the Fy2001-2002 Capital Budget by increasing Appropriations by $508,880; and Declaring an Emergency. b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, ' or his designee, to execute a construction contract in the amount of $831,880 with DS&S Construction, of Corpus Chdsti, Texas, for the One Stop Development Center Project. ISSUE: A construction contract is necessa.ry to remodel the first floor for use as the One Stop Development Center. FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY2003 Maintenance Services Fund Operating Budget and City Hall CIP Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented. .~- Davis Maintenance Services Superintendent Angel R. Escobar, P.E. ~ Director df Engineering Services Additional Support Material: Exhibit "A" Background Information Exhibit "B" Project Budget Exhibit "C" Bid Tab Summary Exhibit "D" Location Map H:\HOME~KEV~NS\GEN~FROSTBLD\I STFLOOR\ AWDMEMO DOC BACKGROUNDINFORMATION Prior Council Action: July 9, 2002 - Award of architectural services contract in the amount $75,400 to Morgan Spear and Associates (M2002-193). July 23, 2002 - Adoption of the FY2003 Annual Budget, which included funding for this project (Ord. No. 024974). September 17, 2002 - Award of a construction contract in the amount of $89,600 to Haeber Roofing Company of Corpus Christi, Texas (M2002-311). Prior Administrative Action: October 9, 2002 - Award of pre-construction demolition contract in the amount of $22,225 to Southern Contracting of Corpus Christi, Texas. BackRround Information: The first floor will house the One Stop Development Center for the City of Corpus Christi. The Center.will house the new Development Services Department which is includes Building Inspection and Planning and components of other departments. The City is acquiring the property through a lease purchase contract with Frost Bank. Remodeling of the second, third, and fourth floors have been completed. Emergency Management and Emergency Operations Center occupies the fourth floor. The third floor houses Fire Department Administration, Emergency Medical Administration, and Fire Training personnel. The second floor houses Fire Prevention and the Local Emergency Planning Committee. Fundin.q: The project funding is provided by the Maintenance Services and City Hall CIP Funds. The City Hall CIP Fund proceeds will be needed in the future for the repair and renovation of City Hall. Repayment of the City Hall CIP proceeds will occur prior to award of the City Hall construction contract. Proiect Description: The project consists of electrical, HVAC, plumbing, drywall partitions, carpentry, millwork, and interior finishes of approximately 18,000 square feet of floor space. Bid Information: The project was bid as a base bid and five additive alternates. additive alternate consists of the following work: · Additive Alternate No. 1 provides of new carpeting and resilient tile flooring; The Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 · Additive Alternate No. 2 provides additional painting; · Additive Alternate No. 3 provides new doors at several locations; · Additive Alternate No. 4 provides vinyl wall covering in selected areas; and · Additive Alternate No. 5 provides an overhead coiling grille at the entry lobby. Bids were opened October 9, 2002. One bid was received from DS&S Construction. The completion time requirements and amount of work in the local market appear to be major factors in receiving only one bid. The recommended award consists of the Base Bid and Additive alternates No. 1 and 2. The amount bid is considered to be acceptable based on the architect's opinion of probable cost. See Exhibit C. Contract Terms: The contract provides for the project to be completed no later than January 15, 2003. Recommendation: Approval of the ordinance and motion as presented. Exhibit A Page 2 of 2 ONE STOP DEVELOPMENT CENTER Frost Bank Lease Space - First Floor PROJECT BUDGET October 22, 2002 ESTIMATED Fiscal Year 2001-02 Maintenance Service Fund $ 75,400.00 Fiscal Year 2002-03 Maintenance Service Fund 479,125.00 City Hall No. 3160 CIP Fund 508,880.00 Total $ 1,063,405.00 Construction Cost (DS&S Construction) $ 831,880.00 Air Handling Units (separate award) 38,800.00 Demolition Contract (separate award) 22,225.00 Construction Contingencies 41,600.00 AE Consultant (Morgan Spear & Associates FY2001-02) 75,400.00 Construction Inspection 35,000.00 Testing N.A. Engineering Reimbursements 12,500.00 Administrative Reimbursements 3,000.00 Incidental Expenses (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 3,000.00 Total $ 1,063,405.00 EXHIBIT "~" ] Page 1 of 1 TABULATION OF BIDS Page 1 of 1 DEPARTBBBT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TBXAS TABULATED BY- Angel R.Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services DATE, Wednesday, October 9,2002 TIMQ OF COMPLETION, On/Before 1/15/2003 EWOINSER-S ESTnmTEs $770,000 City of Corpus Christi One Stop Development Center Project No. 4267 DESCRIPTION QTY. KBIT D&SS Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 8313 C.C., TR 78463 UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT To furnish all labor and materials,tools and necessary equipment to perform the work required for the project at the locations set out by the plane and specifications and in strict accordance with the contract documents for the following prices. 1. Total Base Bid $756,402.00 2. Total Base Bid plus Add.Alt.No.1 $809,202.00 3. Total Base Bid plus Add.Alt.No.l and No.2 $831,880.00 4. Total Base Bid plus Add.Alt.No.1, N0.2, and No.3 $841,131.00 S. Total Base Bid plus Add.Alt.No.l, N0.2, N0.3, and No.4 $856,283..00 6. Total Base Bid plus Add.Alt.No.1, No.2, No.3, No.4 and No.5 $862;979.00 I Pile LOCATION WAP NOT TO S~ALE ~~~ ONE STOP DEV. CTR. ~~/~~ VZCZNZTY ~ EXHZBZT "D PROJECT ~ 4267 ~o~ m s~ C~TY ~UNC~L EXHZB~T ONE STOP DEVELOPMENT CENTER DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES (FPos~ Bank Building) PA~E: I of 1 CI~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TE~S DA~: 10-14-2002 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $508,880 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE OF THE NO. 3160 CITY HALL CIP FUND, TRANSFERRING TO AND APPROPRIATING IN THE NO. 5110 MAINTENANCE SERVICE FUND FOR THE ONE STOP DEVELOPMENT CENTER, WITH INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE NO. 3160 CITY HALL CIP FUND; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 024974 WHICH ADOPTED THE FY 2002-2003 OPERATING BUDGET BY INCREASING REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $508,880 EACH; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 024730 WHICH ADOPTED THE FY2001-2002 CAPITAL BUDGET BY INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS BY $508,880; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY SECTION 1. That $508,880 is appropriated from the unreserved fund balance of the No. 3160 City Hall CIP fund, transferred to and appropriated in the No. 5110 Maintenance Service Fund for the One Stop Development Center, with intent to reimburse the No. 3160 City Hall CIP fund. SECTION 2. That Ordinance No. 024974 which adopted the FY 2002-2003 Operating Budget is amended by increasing revenues and appropriations by $508,880. SECTION 3. That Ordinance No. 024730 which adopted the FY2001-2002 Capital Budget is amended by increasing appropriations by $508,880. SECTION 4. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ., 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Annando Chapa City Secretary Legal form approved James R. Bray, Jr. City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor Lisa Aguilar Cfi Assistant City Attorney ,2002 15 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: October 22, 2002) Case No. 0802-01, Ralph Diaz: A change of zoning from an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling Distrct to an "I-2" Light Industrial Distrct on Steele Addition, Block 6, Lots 55, 56, 57, and 58, located on the north side of Marguerite Street and 200 feet west of 21 st Street. Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (08/28/02}: Denial of the "I-2" Light Industrial D istrrict, and in lieu thereof, approval of an "R-1B" One-family Dwelling Distrct with a "SP" Special Permit. Requested Council Action: Denial of the "I-2" Light Industral Distrct, and in lieu thereof, approval of an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District with a "SP" Special Permit and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: To legalize parking of heavy load vehicles, employee vehicles, and equipment on an undeveloped lot. Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from a "R-1B" One-family Dwelling Distrct to an "1-2" Light Industrial District to legalize parking of heavy load vehicles and eqnipmem utilized by Corpus Christi Disposal Company and parking of employee vehicles on the subject property. Access for the property is provided along Agnes Street, an arterial and Marguerite Street, a local residential street. The subject property was purchased in 1980 and subsequently over the past twenty years has used the site for heavy load vehicle and equipment parking. In 1980, the City Council rezoned the subject property and surrounding properties from an "A-2" District to a "R-lB" District in an effort to enhance and lower the residential density of the area in coordination with Community Development improvements for the area i.e. sidewalks, streets, and curbs and gutters. Areas remaining "A-2" District were developed as apartments. In 1985, City Council approved a Special Permit on Lots 3 and 4, Patrick Webb Addition, east of the subject property, to allow Corpus Christi Disposal to consa-uct an addition at the site of the headquarters. Code Enforcement notified the applicant of the zoning violation on April 8, 2002 and June 20, 2002. The applicant has indicated that two heavy load vehicles are parked on site during the day, eight heavy load vehicles at night and one roll off equipment at varies times. Heavy load vehicles vary in size from four to six tons. The hours of operation for Corpus Christi Disposal Company are between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Washing of vehicles and equipment parked on the subject property occurs at their facility, located along Agnes Street and Marguerite Street, fifty (50) feet east of the subject property. The Corpus Christi Disposal Company has existed since 1942 at the Agnes and Marguerite Street location, as a sanitary waste disposaI operation. The company serves commercial establishments and residences in and outside the City limits. Expanding the "I-2" District along Marguerite Street would allow an incompatible use to co-exist within a single family neighborhood and truck traffic traversing the residential area. Although the Comprehensive Plan supports continued residential development along Marguerite Street between Bluntzer and 21 st Streets, this has not occurred. The recommended Special Permit recognizes the long standing use of this property for storage of equipment and vehicles, but places conditions to retain a landscaped front yard, no vehicle access to Marguerite, and prohibition on maintenance and washing of tracks. The owner has indicated to staffthat a Special Permit is acceptable. Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Commission and Staff's recommendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, thirty-three (33) notices were mailed to the prope~y owners within a 200-foot radius, of which three were returned in favor and two in opposition. The applicant submitted a noticein favor oftherequest. Thisis a noncontroversial e~~CP~~g,. Director ofplanmng ~ MG/FGM/er Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 2 Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Comments Received 3) Planning Commission Minutes 4) Ordinances Pages Pages Pages Pages 3-13 14-15 16-20 21-26 H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~AGENDMEM~0802-01AGENDAMEMO.DOC CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: 0802-01 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 14, 2002 Map No.: J15A Applicant: Ralph Diaz Legal DescrintioafLocation: Steele Addition, Block 6, Lots 55, 56, 57, and 58, located on the north side of Marguerite Street and 200 feet west of 21st Street. Area of Request: 0.37 acre (15,973 square feet) Lot(s) Area: Same as above. Current Zoning: "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District Request: "I-2" Light Industrial District Current Use of Property,: Heavy load vehicle parking, employee vehicle parking, and equipment parking on an undeveloped lot. Purpose of Request: To legalize parking of heavy load vehicles, employee vehicles and equipment on an undeveloped lot. Zoning Change Requested Due .to Notice of Violation: Notified of Violation April 8, 2002. Extension to Correct granted until Junel0, 2002. Second Notice of Violation June 20, 2002. Second Extension to Correct granted until July 12, 2002. Adiacent Zoning: North - "I-2" Light Industrial District South, East, West - "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District Zoning Repor~ Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Di~) P~'g¢ 2 Adineent Land Use: North - Automotive and Disposal Company uses. South (across Marguerite Street) - Undeveloped lots. East and West - Single-family residences. Number of Residential Units Allowed: "R-lB"- 2 units (7.26 dwelling units per acre) "I-2" - Permanent or temporary housing or lodging is not permitted except for caretaker's quarters. Estimated Traffic Generation: Disposal Company- 2 average weekday vehicle trip ends per vehicle x 10 vehicles = 2.0 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Ad] acent Streets/Classification: a) Marguerite Street - local Ri~ht-of-Wa~ Current: a) 40-foot right-of-way with a 24-foot back-to-back paved section. Planned: a) Same as current. 2002 Traffic Count (24-hour~ weekda¥~ non-directional): a) None available. Zoning History of Property: October 1980, City Council rezoned the subject property as part of a comprehensive rezoning from "A-2" District to "R-lB" District. Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases: August 24, 1999, a change of zoning from a "R-lB" District to a "R-2" District was granted for Steele Addition, Block 7, Lots 19 and 20, located on the south side of Marguerite Street. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 3 Zoning Inventory: The subject property is part of a 73-acre tract of land zoned an "R-lB" District. This area is predominantly developed with single-family residential and scattered multiple-family development. Within this "R-lB" District area, there are nine (9) tracts of land zoned an "A-2" District totaling 24 lots on three (3) acres and 1 lot zoned a "R-2" District. Half of these lots remain vacant, while eight (8) lots contain single-family residences and the remaining four (4) lots contain a multiple- family development. North of the "R-lB" District, along south side of Agnes Street and extending east and west, the area consisting of 97 acres is zoned an "I-2" District and is developed with retail uses, restaurants and heavy equipment sales and service uses. North of Agues Street, there is a large area of land zoned an "I-3" District that is developed with various types of light and heavy industrial rises. Planning Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and Background: Thc applicant has requested a change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to an "I-2" Light Industrial District to legalize parking of heavy load vehicles and equipment utilized by Corpus Christi Disposal Company and parking of employee vehicles on the subject property. Access for the property is provided along Agues Street, an arterial and Marguerite Street, a local residential street. The subject property was purchased in 1980 and subsequently over the past twenty years has used the site for heavy load vehicle and equipment parking. In 1980, the City Council rezoned the subject property and surrounding properties from an "A-2" District to a "R-lB" District in an effort to enhance and lower the residential density of the area in coordination with Community Development improvements for the area i.e. sidewalks, streets, and curbs and gutters. Areas remaining "A-2" District were developed as apartments. In 1985, City Council approved a Special Permit on Lots 3 and 4, Patrick Webb Addition, east of the subject property, to allow Corpus Christi Disposal to construct an addition at the site of the headquarters. Code Enforcement notified the applicant of the zoning violation on April 8, 2002 and June 20, 2002. The applicant has indicated that two heavy load vehicles are parked on site during the day, eight heavy load vehicles at night and one roll off equipment at varies times. Heavy load vehicles vary in size from four to six tons. The hours of operation for Corpus Christi Disposal Company are between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Washing of vehicles and equipment parked on the subject property occurs at their facility, located along Agnes Street and Marguerite Street, fifty (50) feet east of the subject property. The Corpus Christi Disposal Company has existed since 1942 at the Agnes and Marguerite Street location, as a sanitary waste disposal operation. The company serves commercial establishments and residences in and outside the City limits. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 4 Expanding the "I-2" District along Marguerite Street would allow an incompatible use to co- exist within a single family neighborhood and track traffic traversing the residential area. The Comprehensive Plan supports the continuation of low-density residential. If favorable consideration is granted for the request, it should be limited to a Special Permit for parking &heavy load vehicles, equipment and employee vehicles with conditions to mitigate the effects of the use. The owner has indicated to staffthat a Special Permit is acceptable. Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements cannot be supportive of the requested "I-2" District. The Westside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to developed with low-density residential. The requested "1-2" District is not consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. However, a Special Permit with conditions to mitigate the effects of the use could be supported. Potential Housing Density: The "R-1B" District permits a density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre or 2 units on the subject property. The requested "I-2" District does not permit permanent or temporary housing or lodging except for a caretaker's quarters. Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: The "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of 25 feet with a side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet each. An "I-2" District requires a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet with no required side or rear yard setbacks unless adjacent to a residential district where a setback often (10) feet would be required. The subject property has residential adjacency to the east and west. Building heights are limited to 35 feet and three (3) stories in the "R-lB" District. The "1-2" District does not have any building height limitations unless adjacent to residential district where the height is limited to 45 feet and three (3) stories. Signage: Signage in the "R-lB" District is limited to one, one square foot wall sign. The "I-2" District permits tmlimited wall and fi:eestanding signs provided they are located behind the front yard setback. Within the front yard setback, one freestanding sign per street frontage with an area of forty (40) square feet and a height of 25 feet is permitted. Off- premise signs (billboards) are also permitted in the "I-2" District. Traffic: The request provides parking for heavy vehicles and equipment. Such vehicles can access the subject property from Marguerite and Agnes Streets. Allowing access through Marguerite Street, a local residential street, would have large and heaw track traffic to traverse the residential area. Parking/Screening: Eleven parking spaces are required for the 10 vehicles and 1 roll off container. Compliance with off-street parking regulations will be required during the permitting phase of the development. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet is required when a business or industrial use locates adjacent to a residential district. A standard screening fence is required along the east and west property lines. Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 5 Costs to City: All infrastructure required to serve the subject property is in place and additional cost to the city is not anticipated. · Platting: The subject property contains a platted lot and further replatting is not required. Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) a) None. Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.) The requested "1-2" District is not consistent with the recommended land use of the Westside Area Development Plan. b) Uses permitted in the requested "I-2" District would be detrimental to the surrounding residential area. e) Large and heavy tracks would traverse a residential area, which is contrary to adopted City policies. Staff Recommendation: Denial of the "1-2" Light Industrial District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles, as shown on the site plan, and with the following conditions: USES: The only use permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles. 2. PARKING SURFACE: The parking surface of the subject property shall be of an impervious surface to accommodate the heavy load vehicles, roll off equipment and employee vehicles. SERVICE OF VEHICLES: No washing or repairing of heavy load vehicles or roll off equipment shall occur on site. All heavy load vehicles and the roll off equipment must be washed off-site before parking in the parking lot. 4. ACCESS: Vehicular access to Marguerite Street is prohibited along Lots 55, 56, 57 and 58, Block 6, Steele Addition. SCREENING: A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet shall be installed and setback seven (7) feet from the south property line adjacent to Marguerite Street and place along the east and west pmperty lines. A four- (4) foot wide pedestrian gate is allowed within the fence area to the south and adjacent to Marguerite Street. 7 Zoning Report Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 6 LANDSCAPING: Oleanders every five (5) foot on center shall be required within the seven (7) foot setback area of the south property line along Marguerite Street. All plant material must be irrigated and maintained in a healthy growing condition. 7. HOURS OF OPERATION: Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. TIME LIMIT: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition gl and in compliance with all other conditions. Attachments: Site Plan Zoning and Ownership Map Ownership List H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~,ONRFrS\0802.01 REPORT.DOC lA STEELE I-3 ~ ST AQNE$ AGNES STREET M,a~y STr-e_~ i STREET TR e X See Comments on Page(s) - Property Owner in Favor - Property Owner Opposed /4~ -/.~- Jul 31, 2002- RP CASE Z0802-01 Subject property O. ners within 200 feet Il.ted on ottoohed ownership list /0 OWNERSHIP LIST CASE NO. 0802-01 Applicant: Ralph Diaz 10610 Gettysburg 78410 Representative: 1 Z0802-01 840900000101 TRAIN HERBERT A P O BOX 9095 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78469 STEELE BK 1 A 2 Z0802-01 840900060010 DIAZ RALPH P O BOX 5583 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LTS 1 THRU 3 PT LT 4 BK 6 Robert C. Morris 5926 S. Staples, Ste. A-2 78413 3 Z0802-01 840900060050 SMITH-BARRY META ANNA 9709 WILKINS DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78410 STEELE POR LTS 4, 5 & 6 BK 6 4 Z0802-01 840900060070 MENDEZ JOSE N 2517 AGNES CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LTS 7 & 8 BK 6 (LESS N55') 5 Z0802-01 840900060090 BENAVIDEZ LANA CONN 1205 LOGAN CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78404 STEELE LTS 9 & 10 BK 6 (LESS N50.55') 4 Z0802-01 840900060110 MENDEZ JOSE N 2517 AGNES CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 11 & ES' OF LT 12 BK 6 (LESS POR TO ROW) 6 Z0802-01 840900060130 AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS U C C AREA LOCAL #779 P O BOX 4535 CORPUS CllRISTI TX 78469 STEELE W20' OF LT 12, ALL LTS 13 THRU 15 BK 6 (LESS POR TO ROW) 7 Z0802-01 840900060460 RUBALCABA JAC1NTA 1116 AGNES CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78401 STEELE LTS 46 & 47 BK 6 8 Z0802-01 840900060480 VASQUEZ ANSELMO % FRANCISCA RIVES AND JUAN AGUILAR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 48 BK 6 9 Z0802-01 840900060490 MENDEZ JOSE NOE 2430 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LTS 49 THRU 52 BK 6 10 Z0802-01 840900060530 DE LA PAZ ROSITA RIVERA %MARIA C V BOCANEGRA ET A 2426 IvtAR. GUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LTS 53 & 54 BK 6 11 Z0802-01 840900060590 GUERRERO JESSE AND MARY GUERRERO 1917 COMANCHE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78408 STEELE LT 59 & W2' LT 60 BK 6 12 7.0802-01 840900060600 ESQUIVEL REBECCA M 2502 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 60 (EXCEPT W2') BK 6 13 Z0802-01 840900070010 ROBLES FELIPE 2501 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LTS I & 2 BLK 7 14 Z0802-01 840900070030 ALVARADO HERLINDA A 76 BURBANK HOUSTON TX 77076 STEELE LTS 3 & 4 BLK 7 /! Ownership List Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 2 15 Z0802-01 840900070050 KRUMMEL EUDELIA M % LILY K NEVAREZ P O BOX 31301 LOS ANGELES CA 90031 STEELE LTS 5 & 6 BLK 7 16 Z0802-01 840900070070 FRANC-X) FRANCISCO ET LrX CONCEPCION 2425 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 7 BLK 7 16 Z0802-01 840900070080 FRANCO FRANCISCO ET UX CONCEPCION 2425 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 8 BLK 7 17 Z0802-01 840900070090 R.EYES MARIA C 5326 ALEJANDRO CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415 STEELE LTS 9 & 10 BLK 7 18 Z0802-01 840900070110 RIOJAS RUDY 4833 HAKEL DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415 STEELE LT 11 BIX 7 19 Z0802-01 840900070120 CASTRO JUAN G 2525 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 12 & Ed2 LT 13 BLK 7 20 Z0802-01 840900070140 SMITH SIDNEY 2527 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 14 & W/2 LT 13 BLK 7 21 Z0802-01 840900070490 GONZALES MANUEL M 4841 CHERYL DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415 STEELE LTS 49 THRU 51 BLK 7 21 Z0802-01 840900070490 GONZALES MANUEL M 4841 CHERYL DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415 STEELE LTS 49 THRU 51 BLK 7 22 Z0802-01 840900070520 GONZALES ARNOLD L 4649 TOTTON CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 STEELE LTS 52 & 53 BLK 7 23 Z0802-01 840900070540 SOTO SIMON ET UX 3813 PRESCOTT CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78416 STEELE LT 54 BLK 7 23 Z0802-01 840900070550 SOTO SIMON ET UX 3813 PRESCOTT CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78416 STEELE LT 55 BLK 7 24 Z0802-01 840900070560 GONZALES ADOLPH M & RITA 5225 FULWELL DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 STEELE LTS 56 & 57 BLK 7 25 Z0802-01 840900070580 BENAVIDES JUAN ET UX ALIC 2502 MARY CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LTS 58 & 59 BLK 7 26 Z0802-01 840900070600 GARCIA ALVINA S 3614 LOCKHEED CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 STEELE LT 60 BLK 7 27 Z0802-01 930700080010 ESTRADA E G PO BOX 5425 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78465 PATRICK WEBB ENTIRE BLK OF 8 28 Z0802-01 930700090130 KEYES ELIDA 3421 LARIAT CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415 PATRICK WEBB LTS 13 THRU 16 BK 9 29 Z0802-01 930700120010 RODRIGUEZ ELUTERIO & ELAD R REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 515 21 ST CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 PATRICK WEBB LTS 1 THRU 4 BLK 12 13 Z0802.-01 930700120050 ROBLES FELIPE 2501 MARGUERITE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 PATRICK WEBB LTS 5 & 6 BLK 12 30 Z0802-01 930700120070 SALMAN ANDREW AND KHAWLAH SALMAN WFE 4602 VAIL STREET CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 PATRICK WEBB LTS 7 & 8 BLK 12 30 Z0802-01 930700130010 SALMAN ANDREW AND KHAWLAH SALMAN WFE 4602 VAIL STREET CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 PATRICK WEBB LTS 1 & 2 BLK 13 Ownership List Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 3 31 Z0802-01 930700130030 DIAZ ISMAEL C 2403 AGNES CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 PATRICK WEBB LTS 3 & 4 BLK 13 31 Z0802-01 930700130050 DIAZ ISMAEL C 2403 AGNES CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78405 PATRICK WEBB LTS 5 & 6 BLK 13 30 Z0802-01 930700130070 SALMAN ANDREW AND KHAWLAH SALMAN WFE 4602 VAIL STREET CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 PATRICK WEBB LTS 7 & 8 BLK 13 32 Z0802-01 TEXAS DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1701 S. PADRE ISLAND DR. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 SP Z0802-01 840900060550 DIAZ RALPH P O BOX 5583 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78465 STEELE LTS 55 THRU 58 BK 6 SP Z0802-01 840900060550 DIAZ RALPH P O BOX 5583 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78465 STEELE LTS 55 THRU 58 BK 6 SP Z0802-01 840900060550 DIAZ RALPH P O BOX 5583 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78465 STEELE LTS 55 THRU 58 BK 6 SP Z0802-01 840900060550 DIAZ RALPH P O BOX 5583 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78465 STEELE LTS 55 THRU 58 BK 6 Z0802-01 ROBERT C. MORRIS 5926 S. STAPLES ST., STE. A-2 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413 ) COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0802-01 Ralph Diaz · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED (Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.) Notices returned from within the 200-foot notification area: Favor: 2) Ralph Diaz, 2403 Agues St. No written comment. 12) Rebecca Esquivel Rosas, 2502 Marguerite St. No written comment. 27) E. G. Estrada, 2318 Agues No written comment. Opposition: 7) Jacinta Rubalcaba, 1116 Agnes St. "I oppose for the following reasons: 1) strong odor of rotting trash, 2) danger to children and elderly when crossing street, 3) streets are too narrow for huge industrial trucks, 4) devaluation of property value, 5) creates health problems with pollution, 6) noise is unbearable in the early morning hours, and 7) people live in this area, it is unfair to put such an industry in a residential area." 29) Eluterio Rodriguez, 515 21st St. "The trucks when backing up make a lot of noise at 3:00 a.m. and the trucks are parked on an empty lot on 21st and Marguerite. When the north wind starts blowing, we smell the rotten trash. They ought to move somewhere else." II. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Comments Received Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 2 Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: Ralph Diaz, 2403 Agnes St. No written comment. Opposition: None. H:W LN-DIRkERMA\WORD~COMMDATA~0802-01 COMMENTS.DOC Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2002 Ralph Diaz: 0802-01 REQUEST: "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "I-2" Light Industrial District on property described as Steele Addition, Block 6, Lots 55, 56, 57, and 58, and located on the north side of Marguarite Street and 200 feet west of 21't Street. Mr. Saldafia presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of a 73-acre tract of land zoned an "R-lB" District. This area is predominantly developed with single-family residential and scattered multiple-family development. Within this "R-lB" District area, there are nine (9) tracts of land zoned an "A-2" District totaling 24 lots on three (3) acres and I lot zoned a "R-lB" District. Half of these lots remain vacant, while eight (8) lots contain single-family residences and the remaining four (4) lots contain a multiple-family development. North of the "R-lB" District, along south side of Agnes Street and extending east and west, the area consisting of 97 acres is zoned an "I-2" District and is developed with retail uses, restaurants and heavy equipment sales and service uses. North of Agnes Street, there is a large area of land zoned an "I-3" District that is developed with various types of light and heavy industrial uses. The applicant has requested a change of zoning from a "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to an "I-2" Light Industrial District to legalize parking of trucks and equipment utilized by Corpus Christi Disposal Company on the subject property. Access for the property is provided along Agnes Street, an arterial and Marguerite Street, a local residential street. The subject property was purchased in 1980 and subsequently over the past twenty years, per the applicant, has illegally used the site for truck and equipment parking. Code Enforcement notified the applicant of the zoning violation on April 8, 2002 and June 20, 2002. The applicant has indicated that two trucks are parked on site during the day, eight tracks at night and one roll off container at varies times. Truck size varies fi.om four to six tons and hours of operation are from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Washing of vehicles and equipment parked on the subject property occurs at the headquarters located along Agnes Street and Marguerite Street, fit~y (50) feet east of the subject property. The Corpus Christi Disposal Company headquarters' has existed since 1942 at the Agnes and Marguerite Street location, as a sanitary waste disposal operation. The company serves commercial establishments in and outside the city limits as well as residential service outside the city limits. In 1980, the City Council rezoned the subject property and surrounding properties fi.om an "A-2" District to a "R-lB" District in an effort to enhance and lower the residential density of the area in coordination with Community Development improvements for the area i.e. sidewalks, streets, and curbs and gutters. Areas remaining "A-2" District were developed as apartments, in 1985, City Council approved a Special Permit on Lots 3 and 4, Patrick Webb Addition, east of the subject property, to allow Corpus Christi Disposal to construct an addition at the site of the headquarters. Expanding the "1-2" Dislrict along Marguerite Street would allow an incompatible use to co-exist within a single family neighborhood and truck traffic traversing the residential area. The Westside Area Development Plan's adopted fut~ure land use map recommends the area to developed with low-density residential. The requested "I-2" District is not consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. There were 33 notices mailed to property owners within a 200-font radius of which two were received in favor and two in opposition. Robert Morris, 509 Brawner, applicant representative, said that the Diaz family has been in operation since 1942 and own the four narrow lots which are the subject property. He said that the parking area is not designed to be a detriment to the community; but would be an enhancement by protecting the neighborhood because of traffic moving early in the morning. Mr. Morris continued that ff the rezenlng were granted, the applicant would eliminate access fi.om Marguerite Street and provide landscaping to eliminate visibility of the business. With regard to the subject property, Mr. Morris said that adding the small portion is not a great sacrifice to put on the neighbors because the property has been used for 22 Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2002 Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 2 Ralph Diaz, co-owner CC Disposal, said that there is not any land on Agues Street that could be used to store his vehicles. He said that he does have another piece of property on Morris Street but his vehicles get vandalized. Mr. Diaz said that he would agree to close access to Marguerite Street and added that he could not use property dasiguated for employee parking because the parking is to keep employees fi.om parking on the street. In response to Commission's question, Mr. Diaz said that the trucks begin operation at 3 or 4 in the morning. In response to Commissioner Pusley, Mr. Saldafla said that staff considered a Special Permit, but decided that the use was inappropriate for the area. Mr. Morris responded to Commission's concerns regarding the odor associated with the trucks by saying that the smell of the owner's properly goes with the business zoned for CC Disposal. He added that the concerns regarding smell would not be eliminated with the denial of the subject property. In response to Commissioner Richter, Mr. Morris said that he was notified by Mr. Saldafla that the employee parking is in violation and would need to be addressed by the Commission at a future date. He added that no washing, maintenance, and only storage of vehicles would be done on the subject property and stressed that the area needs activity for the safety of the residents. Commissioner Saiazar suggested that the case be continued to allow staff an opportunity to meet with the applicant to discuss some special permit uses. Public hearing closed. Mr. Saidatla asked for direction from the Commission for the Special Permit because staff reviewed the use of a Spedial Permit and decided that it would not be appropriate for the area. The Commission suggested that hours of operation, light'mg, landscaping, access to marguerite, screening, no washing repair issues be addressed. Mr. Gunning added that vehicle must be washed prior to being placed on the site. In response to Commissioner Pusley, Mr. Saidafla said that the area could be developed with low income housing with the assistance of the city grants. He added that the CDBG funds were used to create curbs and gutters in previous years. He also informed the Commission that a precedem could be set with other businesses along Agues Street because there are four (4) vacant lots on Marguerite Street that could be considered for rezoning. He added that the area is a residential area and that the proposed use is not compatible use with residences on either side. Vacant area to the west that could request a similar zoning change as previously exhibited in other areas of town. There would be continual impact into the neighborhood. Amsler said that he did not agree with Staff's decision and added that he did not believe that the area would develop residentially and the fact that CDBG funds were used to improve the street did not mean that the area would develop residentially. Mims asked when was the last time anything had been developed in the area. Mr. Saldafla said that it had been a while. Motion by Salazar, seconded by Mims, to continue for two weeks. Motion passed. planning Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Ralph Diaz: 0802-01 REQUEST: "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "I-2" Light Industrial Dis~iet on property described as Steele Addition, Block 6, Lots 55, 56, 57, and 58, and located on the north side of Marguerite Street and 200 feet west of 21't Street. Ms. Goode-Macon, City Planner, presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of a 73-acre tract of land zoned an "R-lB" District. This area is predominantly developed with single-family residential and scattered multiple-family development. Within this "R-lB" District area, there are nine (9) tracts of land zoned an "A-2" District totaling 24 lots on three (3) acres and 1 lot zoned a "R-2" District. Half of these lots remain vacant, while eight (8) lots contain single-family residences and the remaining four (4) lots contain a multiple-family development. North of the "R-lB" District, along south side of Agues Street and extending east and west, the area consisting of 97 acres is zoned an "I-2" District and is developed with retail uses, restaurants and heavy equlpmant sales and service uses. North of Agues Street, there is a large area of land zoned an "I-3" District that is developed with various types of light and heavy indnstxial uses. The applicant has requested a change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-fandiy Dwelling District to an "I-2" Light Indnslrial District to legalize parking of heavy load vehicles and equipment utilized by Coq)ns Christi Disposal Company and parking of employee vehicles on the subject property. Access for the property is provided along Agues Street, an arterial and Marguerite Street, a local residential street. The subject properly was purchased in 1980 and subsequently over the past twenty years, per the applicant, has illegally used the site for heavy load vehicle and equipment parking. Code Enforcement notified the applicant of the zoning violation on April 8, 2002 and Sune 20, 2002. The applicant has indicated that two heavy load vehicles are parked on site during the day, eight heavy load vehicles at night and one roll off equipment at varies times. Heavy load vehicles vary in size from four to six tons and the hours of operalion for Coq)us Christi Disposal Company are between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.nz Washing of vehicles and equipment parked on the subject property occurs at the headquarters, located along Agues Street and Marguerite Street, fifty (50) feet east of the subject property. The Coq)ns Christi Disposal Company headquarters' has existed since 1942 at the Agnes and Marguerite Street location, as a sanitary waste disposal operation. The company serves commercial establishments in and outside the city limits as well as residential service outs/de the city limits. In 1980, the City Council rezoned the subject property and surrounding properties from an "A-2" District to a "R-lB" District in an effort to enhance and lower the res/denlial density of the area in coordination with Community Development improvements for the area i.e. sidewalks, streets, and curbs and gutters. Areas remaining "A-2" District were developed as apartments. In 1985, City Council approved a Special Permit on Lots 3 and 4, Patrick Webb Addition, east of the subject property, to allow Coq)us Christi Disposal to construct an addition at the site of the headquarters. Expanding the "I-2" District along Marguerite Street would allow an incompatible nsc to co-exist within a single family neighborhood and truck traffic traversing the residential area. The Comprehensive Plan supports the continuation of low-density residential. If favorable consideration is granted for the request, it should be limited to a Special Permit for parking of heavy load vehicles, equipment and employee vehicles with conditions to mitigate the effects of the use. The owner has indicated to staff that a Special Permit is acceptable. Denial of the "I-2" Light Industrial District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (I) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles, as shown on the site plan, and with the following conditions: USES: The only use permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot for eight (8) heaw load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles. /t Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 2 2. PARKING SURFA(~E: Thc parking surface of the subject property shall be of an impevtious surface to accommodate the heavy load vehicles, roll off equipment and employee vehicles. SERVICE OF VEHICLES: No washing or repairing of heavy load vehicles or roll off equipment shall occur on site. AH heavy load vehicles and the roll off equipment must be washed off-site before parking in the parking lot. 4. ACCESS: Vehicular access to Marguerite Street is prohibited along Lots 55, 56, 57 and 58, Block 6, Steele Addition. SCREENING: A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet shall be installed and setback seven (7) feet from the south property line adjacent to Marguerite Street and place along the east and west property lines. A four- (4) foot wide pedestrian gate is allowed within the fence area to the south and adjacent to Marguerite Street. LANDSCAPING: Oleanders every five (5) foot on center shall be required within the seven (7) foot setback area of the south property line along Marguerite Street. All plant material must be inigated and maintained in a healthy growing condition. 7. HOURS OF OPERATION: Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. TIME LIMIT: Such Special Permit shah be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition gl and in compliance with all other conditions. There were 33 notices mailed of which four (4) were in favor and two (2) were in opposition. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Robert Morris, 509 Brawner Parkway, said that there is a concern that the proximity of the oleanders to one another might prohibit their growth. He commented that he appreciated Staff's effort to reach an amicable resolution. Ralph Diaz, 10610 Gettysburg, responded to the Commission's question regarding lighting by saying that there is an outside light provided by CPL. Mr. Gunning said that a condition should be stipulated regarding lighting be directional into the Special Permit. Mr. Diaz requested that the oleanders be placed 10-foot on center. Mr. Gunning said that staff did not object since there would also be a screening fence required. Commissioner Richter requested that the dumpster location be moved from the proposed site as illustrated on the site plan to the employee parking area near Agues Street. Mr. Diaz explained that the dumpster would be empty because it would be brought from another site for repair. Additionally, Mr. Diaz noted that the dumpster was not within the subject property. He continued and said that the dumpster is cleaned prior to being repaired. He responded to the Commission, by saying the neighbor complaining about the odor wants the business to move away from the area. Commissioner Zamora asked Mr. Diaz whether he would consider washing his vehicles at another location. Mr. Diaz said that there are no utilities at thc other location, end the same concerns would arise Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Case No. 0802-01 (Ralph Diaz) Page 3 because there are residents near the business. Mr. Morris emphasized that the Uucks are equipped with water and aRer they are emptied at the dumpsite, they are rinsed prior to being brought to the subject property. Commissioner Pusley requested that language be added to the Special Permit to prohibit paging systems and loudspeakers. He also requested that a drip irrigation system be included in the Special Permit. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Salazar, to deny the "I-2" Light IndusU-ial District request and in lieu thereof, approve a Special Pennlt for a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles, as shown on the site plan, and with the following conditions: USES: The only use permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R lB" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles. PARKING SURFACE: The parking surface of the subject property shall be of an impervious surface to accommodate the heavy load vehicles, roll off equipment and employee vehicles. SERVICE OF VEHICLES: No washing or repairing of heavy load vehicles or roll off equipment shall occur on site. All heavy load vehicles and the roll offequipment must be washed off-site before parking in the parking lot. ACCESS: Vehicular access to Marguerite Street is prohibited along Lots 55, 56, 57 and 58, Block 6, Steele Addition. SCREENING: A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet shall be installed and setback seven (7) feet from the south property line adjacent to Marguerite Street and place along the east and west property lines. A four- (4) foot wide pedestrian gate is allowed within the fence area to the south and adjacent to Marguerite Street. LANDSCAPING: Oleanders every ten (10) foot on center shall be required within the seven (7) foot setback area of the south property line along Marguerite Street. All plant material must be irrigated by a soaker husedrip irrigation system and maintained in a healthy growing condition. HOURS OF OPERATION: Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. LIGHTING: If lighting is installed, such lighting shall be placed directionally from the residential neighborhood. 9. INTERCOM: Loud speakers or intercom systems are prohibited. 10. TIME LIMIT: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year oftha date of this ordinance unless the propex~y is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY RALPH DIAZ, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO LOTS 55, 56, 57 AND 58, BLOCK 6, STEELE ADDITION, (CURRENTLY ZONED "R-lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT) BY GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A PARKING LOT FOR EIGHT (8) HEAVY LOAD VEHICLES, ONE (1) ROLL OFF EQUIPMENT AND PARKING FOR EMPLOYEE VEHICLES SUBJECT TO A SITE PLAN AND TEN ('10) CONDITIONS; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Ralph Diaz, for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 28,2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Chdsti, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Chdsti and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by granting a Special Permit for a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles on Lots 55,56, 57 and 58, Block 6,Steele Addition, (currently zoned "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District), located on the north side of Marguerite Street and 200 feet west of 21st Street. SECTION 2. That the Special Permit granted in Section I of this Ordinance is subject to a site plan attached as Exhibit A and the following ten (10) conditions: U$]~$: The only use permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot for eight (8) heavy load vehicles, one (1) roll off equipment and parking for employee vehicles. PARKING SURFACF: The parking surface of the subject property shall be of an impervious surface to accommodate the heavy load vehicles, roll off equipment and employee vehicles. tV~=GALV-AWU-EG-DIR~DoyleDC u r tisWIYDOCS~2002~P&ZO RD02~Zonlng.oro, U:)OYLEC~2002~Z080201 B.RalpDiaz. CCDIspos,Ord. S p.pc.doc Z/ Page 2 of 4 SERVICE OF VEHICLES: No washing or repairing of heavy load vehicles or roll .off equipment shall occur on site. All heavy load vehicles and the roll off equipment must be washed off-site before parking in the parking lot. 4. ACCESS: Vehicular access to Marguerite Street is prohibited along Lots 55, 56, 57 and 58, Block 6, Steele Addition. SCREENING: A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet shall be installed and setback seven (7) feet from the south property line adjacent to Marguerite Street and place along the east and west property lines. A four- (4) foot wide pedestrian gate is allowed within the fence area to the south and adjacent to Marguerite Street. LANDSCAPING: Oleanders every ten (10) foot on center shall be required within the seven (7) foot setback area of the south property line along Marguerite Street. All plant material must be irrigated by a soaker hose drip irrigation system and maintained in a healthy growing condition. 7. HOURS OF OPERATION: Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 8. LIGHTING: If lighting is installed, the lighting shall be directed away from the residential neighborhood. 9. INTERCOM: Loudspeakers or intercom systems are prohibited. 10. TIME LIMIT: The Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. SECTION 3. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. \~EGAL~J~AW~-EG-D~R\D~y~eDCurtis~v~YD~CS~2~P&Z~RD~2~-~n~ng~rd~D~YLE~2~Z~8~2~1 B.RalpDiaz. CCDispos. Ord.SP.PC.doc Page 3 of 4 SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22"dday of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM James R. Bray, Jr. c,ty e // /7 Doyle O~urtis Senior ~sis~an~ Oi~ A~orney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi ~EGAL~-Aw~EG-D~R~D~y~eD~u~1is~YD~CS~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~z~n~ng~rd~YLEc~2~2~z~8~2~ IB.RalpD~.CCDis~.O~.Sp.~.d~ EXHIBIT A APPLICANT'S REQUEST AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY RALPH DIAZ, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO LOTS 55,56,57 AND 58, BLOCK 6, STEELE ADDITION, FROM "R-lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "1-2" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Ralph Diaz, for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 28, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, dudng a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on Lots 55, 56, 57, and 58, Block 6, Steele Addition, located on the north side of Marguerite Street and 200 feet west of 21st Street, from "R-1B" One-Family Dwelling District to "1-2" Light Industrial District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full fome and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. ~9-EQAL~JkW~.EC--DIR~Doyle DCur tis~MYDOCS~2002~P&ZORD02~Zonlng.ord~OOYLEC~2002~Z08020 lA. RalpDtaz. Ord ~p.d~ Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds end declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22"dday of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM ONLY 11 October, 2002 James R. Bray, Jr.~ Cityd~[neY /'/ /'~ Doyle D,/~rtis Senior A~sistant City Attorney ~-EGAL~-A~V~EG-~R~y~eDCu~s~/~YD~cs~2~2~P&Z~R~n~ng~n:N:)~YLEc~3~2~z~8~2~ 1A. Ra~Di~.~,d~ 16 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: October 22, 2002) Case No. 0802-03~ Yolanda Rodriguez: A change of zoning from an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-4" General Business District on Alameda Park Subdivision, Block 6, Lot 30, located on the east side of Everhart Road, approximately 500 feet south of Avalon Street. Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (08/28/02): Denial of the "B-4" General Business, and in lieu thereof, approval of a "B-IA" Neighborhood Business District. Requested Council Action: Denial of the "B-4" General Business District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a "B-1A" Neighborhood Business District and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: For a tint, alarm and audio systembusiness. Summary: The subject property is a vacant lot containing 0.17 acre. The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business Disasct in order to establish a window, auto tint, alarm and audio installation system business in conjunction with a residential unit. Auto tint, alarm and audio uses are classified in the zoning ordinance as major automotive services which requires a "B-3" or "B-4" Dis~ict. The applicant plans to construct a 2-story 4,000 square foot building. The frrst floor will consist of 2,000 square feet for the business use while the second floor will be used as a residential unit, also 2,000 square feet, for the owner. The lot has direct access to an arterial, Everhart Road, with no access to a residential street. The subject property is adjacent to single-family residences to the north, east and across Everhart Road to the west. There is an existing "B-lA" District property to the south that is undeveloped and a "B-I" District lot further south developed as a hair salon. Approximately 100 feet north of the subject property, multiple lots have been developed commercially under a Special Permit with a clock and lamp/furniture shop. Over the past five-(5) years, the Everhart Road corridor has slowly trausitioned to nonresidential uses. In November 1999, Lots 24, 25, and 26, approximately 150 feet south of the subject prope~y, were granted an "AB" Professional Office District with a Special Permit for limited retail uses because uses in the "B-I" District, such as fueling stations, pawn shops and liquor stores were not considered appropriate in this area. The proposed "B-4" District would allow incompatible uses adjacent to the surrounding residential properties. Transitioning of this corridor has been limited to "AB", "B-I" and "B-lA" Districts. The "B-lA" District was designed specifically to protect adjoining residential areas by requiring increased rear setbacks and more residential compatible uses. The requested "B-4" District is not supported by the adopted plan, and in lieu thereof, a "B-lA" District is recommended. The "B-IA" District does not allow for the auto tint, alarm and audio business, but will enable the applicant to develop the property with various "B-lA" uses are compatible to residential adjacent areas. At the Planning Commission public hearing the applicant indicated that a Special Permit for an auto tinting use only would be acceptable, to which the Commission declined. Aoolicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Commission and SlaWs recommendation for a "B-lA" District if a "B-4" District or Special Permit is not considered. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, thirty-three (35) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which four were returned in favor and six in opposition. The owner of the subject property submitted a notice in favor of the request. Opposition to the request is 24.01%. The 20% role is in effect. This is considered a controversial case.' ~~/~~ Director of Planning MG/FGM/er Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0802-03 (Yolanda Rodriguez) Page 2 Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Comments Received 3) Planning Commission Minutes 4) Ordinances Pages Pages Pages Pages 3-11 12-14 15-16 17-20 H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~AGENDMEM\0802-03AGENDAM EMO.DOC CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: 0802-03 August 28, 2002 I16C Yolanda Rodriguez Alameda Park Subdivision, Block 6, Lot 30, located on the east side of Everhart Road, approximately 500 feet south of Avalon Street. 0.17 acres Same as above. "R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District "B~4" General Business District Vacant land. Tint, Alarm and Audio System business. Not applicable. - "R- lB" One-family Dwelling District - "B-lA" Neighborhood Business District - (across Everhart Road) "R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zonine: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Adiacent Zoning: North, East South West Adjacent Land Use: - Single-family residences. - Undeveloped land. (across Everhart Road) Single-family residences. North, East South West Zoning Report Case No. 0802-03 (Yolanda Rodriguez) Page 2 Number of Residential Units Allowed: "R-lB" - 1 unit (7.26 units per acre) "B-lA" - 6 units (36 dwelling units per acre) "B-4" - 6 units (36.30 dwelling units per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: Single-family residence (detached) - 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 1 dwelling unit = 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Single-family residence (detached) - 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 6 dwelling units = 60 average weekday vehicle trip ends. General Business - t 1.50 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area x 2,000 square feet of gross floor area = 23 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Adjacent Streets/Classification: a) Everhart Road - arterial Right-of-Way Design Current: a) 80-foot fight-of-way with a 48-foot back-to-back paved section. Planned: a) Same as current. 2001 Traffic Count {24-hour~ weekday~ non-directional): a) 20,380 vehicle trips per day. Zoning History of Property: There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-03 (Yolanda Rodriguez) Page 3 Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases: In June 2000, Lot 29, Block 6, Alameda Park, located on the east side of Everhart Road and immediately south of the subject property was granted a change of zoning fi.om "R-lB" to "B-lA" for a hair salon use. In August 2001, Lot 10 and a portion of LOt 11, Block 1, Surmyside Strip, located on the east side of Everhart Road and south of the subject property was granted a change of zoning from "AB" to "B-lA" with a Special Permit for a hair salon use subject to landscaping requirements. In August 2001, Lot 14B and 15, Block 1, Sunnyside Strip, located on the east side of Everhart Road and south of the subject property was granted a change of zoning fi.om "AB" to "B-I" for a hair salon. Lot 1 of the application, location along Sam Street was denied a change of zoning. In September 1998, Lot 1, Block 32, Pope Place 5, located on the northwest comer of Harry Street and Everhart Road, west from the subject property, the Planning Commission denied a change of zoning from an "R-lB" District to a "R-2" District. In November 1998, the applicant withdrew the request. In January 1998, Lot B-4, South Staples Center, located on the east side of Everhart Road, on the north side of South Staples Street and south of the subject property, was denied a change of zoning to an "I-2" District, and in lieu thereof, was granted a Special Permit for a resistor plant. In January 1995, Lot 35, located on the east side of Everhart Road and north of the subject property, was denied a "B-I" District and granted a Special Permit for furniture sales. In July 1994, Lots 33 and 34, located on the east side of Everhart Road and north of the subject property, was denied a "B-i" District and granted a Special Permit for a clock shop. Zoning Inventory: The subject property is part of a larger area zoned a "R-lB" District predominantly developed with single-family residences. Immediately south of the subject property is a vacant lot zoned with a "B-lA" District. Further south is a 0.23-acre lot zoned a "B-I" District and occupied with a hair salon. Lots 24, 25 and 26 along Everhart Road and south of the subject property are zoned with an "AB" District. To the north along Avalon Street and extending northwest, the area is zoned a "B-I" District containing 8.30 acres and developed mostly with retail establishments. Also along Avalon Street, there area several tracts totaling 1.29 acres that are developed with a realtors' office, a hair salon and an engineering office and zoned "AB" and "B-i" Districts. Zonin~ Report Case No. 0802-03 (Yolanda Rodriguez) Page 4 Planning Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and Background: The subject property is a vacant lot containing 0.17 acre. The applicant has requested a change of zoning on the subject property from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B4" General Business District, in order to establish a tint, alarm and audio system business in conjunction with a residential unit. Auto tint, alarm and audio uses are classified in the zoning ordinance as major automotive services and are first permitted in the "B-4" District. The applicant plans to construct a 2-story 4,000 square foot building. The first floor will consist of 2,000 square feet for the business use while the second floor will be used as a residential unit, also 2,000 square feet, for the owner. The lot has direct access to an arterial, Everhart Road, with no access to a residential street. The subject property is adjacent to single-family residences to the north, east and across Everhart Road to the west. There is an existing "B-lA" District property to the south that is undeveloped and a "B-I" District lot further south developed as a hair salon. Approximately I00 feet north of the subject property, multiple lots have been developed commercially under a Special Permit with a clock and lamp/fumitnre shop. Over the past five (5) years, the Everhart Road corridor has slowly transitioned to nonresidential uses. In November 1999, Lots 24, 25, and 26, approximately 150 feet south of the subject property, were granted an "AB" Professional Office District with a Special Permit for limited retail uses because uses in the "B-I" District, such as fueling stations, pawn shops and liquor stores were not considered appropriate in this area. The proposed "B-4" District would allow incompatible uses adjacent to the surrounding residential properties. Transitioning of this corridor has been limited to "AB", "B-I" and "B-lA" Districts. The "B-lA" District was designed as a protective District for adjoining residential areas by requiting increased rear adjacency and residential compatible USES. The requested "B-4" District is not supported by staff and instead a "B-IA" District is recommended. The "B-lA" District does not allow for the tint, alarm and audio business, but enables the applicant to utilize the property for various uses allowed under the District that are compatible to the adjacent residential areas. At the Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant indicated that a Special Permit for auto tinting use only would be acceptable, to which the Commission declined. Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements are not supportive of the requested "B-4" District. The Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with professional office uses. The requested "B-4" District is not consistent with the Plan's recommended land use, however, the newly created "B-lA" District that provides for commercial uses sensitive to adjacent residences is supported by the Plan's policy statements. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-03 (Yolanda Roclriguez) Page 5 Potential Housing Density: An "R-lB" District permits a density of 7.26 dwelling traits per acre or 1 dwelling unit on the subject property. The requested "B-4" District permits 36.30 dwelling units per acre or 6 units on the subject property. The recommended "B-lA" District allows 36 dwelling units per acre or 6 units on the subject property. Helght/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: The "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of 25 feet and a side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet each. The "B-4" District requires a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet and no side or rear yard setbacks unless adjacent to a residential district where a setback of ten (10) feet along that residential adjacency would be required. The subject property has residential adjacency along the north and east property lines that will require a setback often (10) feet. Building heights are limited to 35 feet and three (3) stories in the "R-lB" District. There are no building height limitations in the "B-4" District. The "B-lA" District also requires a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet and no side or rear yard setback unless adjacent to a residential district where a side yard setback often (10) feet and a rear yard of fifteen (15) feet is required. Building height in the "B-lA" District is limited to 36 feet unless adjacent to a residential district where the height is limited to 26 feet. Signage: Signs in the "R-lB" District are limited to one wall sign with an area not to exceed one square foot. Signs in the "B-4" District are unlimited as to size and number provided they are located behind the front yard setback. Freestanding signs within the front yard setback are limited to one sign per street frontage with a sign area not to exceed forty (40) square feet and a height of 25 feet. The "B-lA" District permits freestanding and wall signs. One freestanding sign per frontage along an expressway, frontage road, arterial, or collector is permitted with a maximum height of fifteen (15) feet and a minimum setback often (10) feet. The freestanding sign may have a sign area of thirty (30) square feet or ¼ square foot per linear foot of street frontage, whichever is greater, but in no event exceed fifty (50) square feet. Wall signs in the "B-lA" District are limited to an area of one square foot per linear foot of wall with a door for the public. Traffic: The proposed business use is estimated to generate approximately 23 daily trip ends. With direct access to an arterial, Everhart Road, any impact onto the street system will be minimal. The subject property does not have any direct access to a local residential street and would not adversely impact the surrounding residential properties. Parking/Screening: General business uses are required to provide one parking per 200 square feet of floor area. Compliance with the off-street parking regulations will be required before a certificate of occupancy can be issued. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet is required when a business use locates adjacent to a residential district. A standard screening fence will be required along the north and east property lines. Costs to City: The change in zoning will not necessitate any expenditures by the City. Platting: The subject property contains one platted lot and further replatting is not required. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-03 CYolanda Rodriguez) Page 6 Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) a) None. Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.) a) The requested B D~stnct ~s not consistent w~th the adopted Southeast Area Development Plan's recommended land use. Staff Recommendation: Denial, and in lieu thereof, recommend a "B-lA" Neighborhood Business District. Attachments: Zoning and Ownership Map Ownership List H :~PLN~DIR~ERMA\WORDXZONRPTS\0802-03CCREPORT.DOC Aug 13, 2002 - RP CASE Z0802-03 · - Property Owner in Favor X - Property Owner Opposed See Comments on Page(s) ~ Subject property Owners within 200 feet listed on ottoched ownership list~ Applicant: Yolanda Rodriguez 4833 Goldeneye 78413 1 Z0802-03 009500050280 COLLINS BRUCE L JR 241 MONTCLAIR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 28 BK 5 OWNERSHIP LIST CASE NO. 0802-03 2 Z0802-03 009500050290 GUILLEN REYNALDO ET UX 641 SAM CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 29 BK 5 3 Z0802-03 009500050300 BROWN GENE ET Lrx BARBARA 2201 BROADWAY SANANTONIO TX 78215 ALAMEDA PARK LT 30 BK 5 4 Z0802-03 009500050310 DULANEY MARK 322 WILLIAMSON CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 ALAMEDA PARK LT 31 BK 5 5 Z0802-03 009500050320 LOPEZ NICA_NOR G ET UX 629 SAM CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 32 BK 5 6 Z0802-03 009500050330 DIMAS RENE R 4410 SUNLIGHT CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 ALAMEDA PARK LT 33 BK 5 7 Z0802-03 009500050340 MORROW DAN L JR 4926 HIGH MEADOWS CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 ALAMEDA PARK LT 34 BK 5 8 Z0802-03 009500060070 PLANT ALICE E AND HOWARD HILTON PLANT DEC'D 618 SAM CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 7 BLK 6 9 Z0802-03 009500060080 WISDOM KAREN T 622 SAM CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 8 BLK 6 10 Z0802-03 009500060090 LOPEZ ANTONIO HOMERO ET U BLANCA C LOPEZ 626 SAM STREET CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 9 BLK 6 11 Z0802-03 009500060100 GUZMAN JOSE JR ET UX MYRA GALLARDO 630 SAM CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 10 BLK 6 12 Z0802-03 009500060110 HARRIS FREDERICK F ET UX 6.34 SAM ST CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 11 BLK 6 13 Z0802-03 009500060120 CEBALLOS ELOY ET UX ESTHE 10626 OUTPOST DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78410 ALAMEDA PARK LT 12 BLK 6 14 Z0802-03 009500060130 BENAVIDES ELOISA TR FOR ELOISA BENAVIDEZ KEV LVG 642 SAM STREET CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 13 BLK 6 15 Z0802-03 009500060140 NUNNERY VICKI I AND ARIZONA O HALLMARK 646 SAM CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 14 BLK 6 16 Z0802-03 009500060150 ZIMMERMAN MARK WAYNE ETUX CINDY LYNNE 650 SAM ST CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 ALAMEDA PARK LT 15 BLK 6 17 Z0802-03 009500060260 VICKNAIR JOHN J JR ETUX GERTRUDE A VICKNAIR P O BOX 331580 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78463 ALAMEDA PARK LT 26 BLK 6 18 Z0802-03 009500060270 KIHO CORPORATION P O BOX 6675 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 ALAMEDA PARK LT 27 BLK 6 Ownership List ~ No. 0802-03 (Yohmda Rodfiguez) Page 2 19 Z0802-03 009500060280 DUNDA TAMMY ETVIR LANCE DUNDA 3018 AUSTIN CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78404 ALAMEDA PARK LT 28 BLK 6 20 Z0802-03 009500060290 KACZENSKI CHESTER A AND SOL B KACZENSKI WFE P O BOX 270995 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78427 ALAMEDA PARK LT 29 BLK 6 21 Z0802-03 009500060310 MOLINA MARY 4505 LAMONT CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 ALAMEDA PARK LT 31 BLK 6 22 Z0802-03 009500060320 CURRIER WAYNE D AND GARY I CURRIER 625 EVERItART CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 ALAMEDA PARK LT 32 BLK 6 23 Z0802-03 009500060330 FERRIS JOEL E ETUX CYNTI-HA WILSON 8218 ETIENNE DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78414 ALAMEDA PARK LT 33 BLK 6 24 Z0802-03 009500060340 SUNRISE CLOCK SHOPPE INC 617 EVERHART RD CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 ALAMEDA PARK LT 34 BLK 6 25 Z0802-03 685800330010 MILLER FAMILY REVOC TRUST LLOYD/LAVETA MILLER,TRSTE 4134 POMPANO PL CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 1 BLK 33 26 Z0802-03 685800330020 O BRIEN JOSEPH E 4130 POMPANO PL CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 2 BLK 33 27 Z0802-03 685800330030 MUNOZ EDWARD SR 4126 POMPANO CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 3 BLK 33 28 Z0802-03 685800330230 JIMENEZ JUAN F ET UX IvIELISSA 4137 MERIDIAN PLACE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 23 BLK 33 29 Z0802-03 685800330240 PEREZ IGNACIO AND KAREN PISNEY WFE 4141 MERIDIAN PLACE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 24 BLK 33 30 Z0802-03 685800340010 POTTS DOROTHY M 4138 MERIDIAN CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 1 BLK 34 31 Z0802-03 685800340020 KING THOMAS F J 4134 MERIDIAN PLACE CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 POPE PL 5 LT 2 BLK 34 32 Z0802-03 TEXAS DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1701 S. PADRE ISLAND DR. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78416 SP Z0802-03 009500060300 CERVANTES NORA 285 MOHAVE LANE HOFFMAN ESTATES IL 60194 ALAMEDA PARK LT 30 BLK 6 Z0802-03 GREGORY ALLEN CUMMINGS 629 ROBERT DR. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78412 I~AVOR OPPOSED COMMENTS RECEWED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0802-03 Yolanda Rodriguez (Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.) Notices returned from within the 200-foot notification area: Favor: 3) 13) 21) 25) Gene Brown, 2201 Broadway, San Antonio No written comment. Eloy Ceballos, 10626 Outpost Dr. No written comment. Mary Molina, 4505 Lamont "New owner will clean up the mess at this location - enhance neighborhood." Lloyd & Laveta Miller, 4134 Pompano Place No written comment. Opposition: 22) Wayne and Gary Currier, 625 Everhart Road '*No automotive business in a residential neighborhood. No business hours after 6:00 p.m." See attached letter from Gary Currier. 23) Joel Ferris, 8218 Etienne "I am OK with small business or professional'office, but not auto-related businesses." 24) Sunrise Clock Shop, Inc., 617 Everhart Road "Small neighborhood business or professional office would be OK, but please no auto-related." Comments Received Case No. 0802-03 Orolanda Rodriguez) Page 2 II. 26) Joe O'Brien, 4130 Pompano Place No written cominent. 29) Ignacio Perez, 4141 Meridian Place "Do not want mechanic's noise across my bedroom, nor the lights of their business." 30) Dorothy M. Ports, 4138 Meridian Place No written comment. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: Opposition: Nora Cervantes, 285 Mohave Lane, Hoffman Estates, IL "Good for the community." None. H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD\COMMDATA\0802-03COMMENTS.DOC /$ MUEi i ~R, VACEK & KIECKE, L.L.P. A'FTORNEY AT LAW AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 August 21, 2002 City Planning Commission P.O. Box 92777 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Re: Case No. 0802-03 Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing in order to express my opposition to the petition of Yolanda Rodriguez to change the zoning from R-lB to B-4 for the property located at 633 Everhart, known as Block 6, Lot 30 of Alameda Park Subdivision. I, along with my brother, Wayne D. Currier, own the property located at 625 Everhart, (Block 6, Lot 32 of Alameda Park Subdivision). This property has been in our family since 1951. We were both raised there and my brother is now living there in his retirement. I believe that zoning the property to B-4 is completely out of line with the nature of the nature. While the block is turning commercial, all previous rezoning as been either AB or R-lB, which is more consistent with the fact that the neighborhood is still predominantly residential, especially for the residents living on Sam St. I have expressed my consent to prior neighbors having their rezoning changed to R-lB or AB, but I do oppose any rezoning to B-4. A rezoning of B-4 would create the potential of creating a nuisance problem, particular for neighbors who actually reside on their property, and would lead to a decrease in value of neighboring properties. If you need any further information, please feel free to contact me. Enclosures CC: Mr. Wayne D. Currier 625 Everhart Corpus Christi, Texas 78411 Sincerely yours, Gary I. ~rrier RECEIVED AUG 2 6 2OO2 CITY OF CORPus PLANNING & DL~EI.OPMllff Plannln~ Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Yolanda Rodriguez: 0802-03 REQUEST: "R-IB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Commercial Business District on property described as Alameda Park Subdivision, Block 6, Lot 30, and located on the east side of Everhart Road, approximately 500 feet south of Avalon Street. Ms. Goode-Macon presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The subject property is part of a larger area zoned a "R-lB" District predominantly developed with single-family residences. Immediately south of the subject property is a vacant lot zoned with a "B-lA" District. Further south is a 0.23-aere lot zoned a "B-I" District and occupied with a hair salon. Lots 24, 25 and 26 along Everhart Road and south of the subject property are zoned with an "AB" District. To the north along Avalon Street and extending northwest, the area is zoned a "B-I" District containing 8.30 acres and developed mostly with retail establishments. Also along Avalon Street, them area several tracts totaling 1.29 acres that are developed with a realtors' office, a hair salon and an engineering office and zoned "AB" and "B-I" Districts. The applicant has requested a change of zoulng on the subject property from "R-lB', One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District, in order to establish a tint, alarm and audio system business in conjunction with a residential unit. Auto tint, alarm and audio uses arc classified in the zoning ordinance as major automotive services and are first permitted in the "B4" District. The applicant plans to construct a 2-story 4,000 square foot building on a 0.17 acre lot. The first floor will consist of 2,000 square feet for the business use while the second floor is designated as a one-family residential unit comprised of 2,000 square feet for the owners' living accommodafious. The lot has direct access to an arterial, Everhart Road, with no access to a residential street. The subject property is adjacent to single-family residences to the north, east and across Everhart Road to the west. There is an existing "B-lA" District property to the south that is undeveloped and a "B-I" District lot further south developed as a hair salon. Approximately 100 feet north of the subject property, multiple lots have been developed commercially under a Special Permit with a clock and lamp/furniture shop. Over the past five (5) years, the Everhart Road corridor has slowly trausitionad to nonresidential uses. In November 1999, Lots 24, 25, and 26, approximately 150 feet south of the subject property, were granted an "AB" Professional Office District with a Special Permit for limited retail uses because the "B-I" District uses, such as fueling stations, pawn shops and liquor stores were not considered appropriate in this area. The proposed "B-4" District would allow incompatible uses adjacent to the surrounding residential properties. Trausitioning of this corridor has been limited to "AB", "B-I" and "B-lA" Districts. The "B-lA" District was designed as a protective District for adjoining residential areas by requiring increased rear adjacency and residential compatible uses. The requested "B- 4" District is not supported by staff and instead a "B-lA" District is recommended. The "B-IA" District does not allow for the tint, alarm and audio business, but enables the applicant to utilize the property for various uses allowed under the District that are compatible to the adjacent residential areas. The Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land use raap recommends the area to develop with professional office uses. The requested "B-4" District is not consistent with the Plan's recommended land use, however, the newly created "B-lA" District that provides for commercial uses sensitive to adjacent residences is supported by the Plan's policy statements. Therefore, staff recommends denial, and m lieu thereof, recommend a "B-lA" Neighborhood Business Distxict. Although the "B-IA" District does not allow the "auto tint use", it will provide the applicant/owner future opportun/ties for development of the subject property without the expense of re-applying for a change of zoning. There were 35 notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of which thiee (3) were returned in favor; the owner submitted a notice in favor; and six (6) notices were received in opposition. The total opposition totals 24.01 percent. Public hearing was opened. Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Case No. 0802-03 (Yolanda Rodriguez) Page 2 Yolanda Rodriguez, 4833 Golden Eye, representing the applicants said that they would accept the "B-lA" Dis~ct but prefers a Special Penult for the auto tint use. Ms. Rodtiguez said that her clients would eliminate the alarm system installation because of the noise. She added that her clients agreed to the hours of operation as set forth in the "B-lA" District. Ms. Rodriguez said that she is concerned with economic development and added that the propeWy would have a new building which would be attractive and aesthetically appealing. Ignacio Perez, 4141 Meridian Place, said that he lives directly across thc street fi.om the subject property and that he is in opposition because of noise from alarms. In response to Commission, Mr. Perez said that he met with the applicant earlier in the day and that she did not convey the same information being presented at the meeting. In response to the Commission regarding Speciai permit conditions he would be agreeable to, Mr. Perez said that he was concerned with large signs, lighting, parking, loading and receiving vehicles. Vice Chair Mires explained the "B-lA" District uses to which Mr. Gunning said that the "B-lA" District prohibits any automotive service uses that require the use of a service bay. Gwen O'Brien, 4130 Pompano, said she was opposed to the requested "B-.4" District and did not believe Everhart was conducive to general commercial uses. Ms. O'Brien said that she preferred the "B- lA" District to assist in controlling the conditions in the area. In response to Commissioner Zamora, Mr. Gunning said that staff is opposed to a special permit use for the subject property because of the sensitivity of the area. He said a "B-IA" District would be more conducive to the area. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Pusley, seconded by Mires, to approve the "B-lA" District. Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY YOLANDA RODRIGUEZ, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO LOT 30, BLOCK 6, ALAMEDA PARK SUBDIVISION, FROM" R-lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "B-IA" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Yolanda Roddguez for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public headngs were held on Wednesday, August 28, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Chdsti and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on Lot 30, Block 6, Alameda Park Subdivision, located on the east side of Everhart Road, approximately 500 feet south of Avalon Street, from "R-1B' One-family Dwelling District to "B-IA" Neighborhood Business District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. ~JEGAL~-AW~LEG-DIR~DoyleDC u ffis~IYDOCS~-002~P &ZORD02~Zoning ,ord~DOYLEC~2002~Z080203B,YRodrguz. Ord .PC,doc /? Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five .Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22nd day of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr, Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 11 October, 2002 James R. Bray, Jr. By: .,V~v t ~ ~//%.~Z._ Doyle ~l~Curtis Senior"Assistant City Attorney \~EGALv-AW~LEG-D~R~D~y~eDCurt~s~YD~S~2~P&Z~RD~2~Z~n~ng~rd~D~YLE~2~2~Z~8~2~3B~YR~drguz~rd~P~d~c APPLICANT'S REQUEST AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY YOLANDA RODRIGUEZ, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO LOT 30, BLOCK 6, ALAMEDA PARK SUBDIVISION, FROM " R-'lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Yolanda Rodriguez for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 28, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, dudng a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City HalF, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on Lot 30, Block 6, Alameda Park Subdivision, located on the east side of Everhart Road, approximately 500 feet south of Avalon Street, from "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District to "B-4" General Business District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. ~EGAL~AW~LEG~D~R~D~y~eD~urt~sW~YD~2~P&Z~RD~2~Z~n~ng~rd~D~YLE~2~2~Z~8~2~3A~YR~drguz~rd~App~d~c /? Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Chdsti as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Chdsti. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (f) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22nd day of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 11 October, 2002 James R. Bray, Jr. Doyle D.,~rtis Senior A~sistant City Attorney ~EGAL~LAW~LEG-D~R~D~y~eDcurt~s~MYD~S~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~ning~x:f~D~YLEc~2~2~Z~8~2~3A~YR~drguz~rd~App~d~c 17 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: October 22, 2002) Case No. 0802-04~ MTM Northwest Inc. & MTM Northwest~ Ltd.: A change of zoning f~oma "F-R' Farm-Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District on 6.308 acres out of 9.808 acres, Nueces Pdver Irrigation Park, west 1/3 of the east 3/4 of Lot 1, Section 2, located approximately 550 feet south of Northwest Boulevard and 525 feet west of County Road 69. Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (08/28/02): Approval of the "BM" General Business District. Requested Council Action: Approval of the "B-4" General Business District and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: For general business development. Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning f~om "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District, in order to develop the property with a general business use. The subject property is located on the south 6.3 acres ora 9.0 acre tract fronting Northwest Boulevard. The north 3.5 acres are zoned a "BM" Dislfict. The subject propexty and the adjoining "BM" north property are planned as a joint development. Access to the subject property is proposed through the adjoining "B-4" District property to the north that has direct access to NoCthwest Boulevard. Northwest Boulevard is approximately 525 feet north of the subject property. There are no existing residences abutting the subject property. The laud to the north, south and east is currently used as farmland. The adjacent a'act west of the subject property, is zoned a "B-4" District and developed with offices, batting cages, an athletic gym, and a landscape nursery. Approval of the "B-4" District would be an expansion of the adjacent "B-4" Dislxict to the west and north. The Northwest Area Development Plan recommends this area to be developed with general commercial uses. Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Commission and Staff's recommendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, thirteen (13) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200froot radius, of which none were returned in favor or in opposition. This is a noncontroversial case. Michael N. Gunmng, AICP f Director of Planning / MG/FGM/er Attachments: 1) Zoning Report Pages 2-8 2) Comments Received Page 9 3) Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 4) Ordinance Pages 11-14 H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~AGENDMEM\0802-04AGENDAMEMO.DOC CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: 0802-04 August 28, 2002 M9C & L9A MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd. Being 6.308 acres out of 9.808 acres, Nueces River hxigation Park, west 1/3 of the east % of Lot 1, Section 2, located approximately 550 feet south of Northwest Boulevard and 525 feet west of County Road 69. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Adjacent Zoning: North, West - "B-4" General Business District South, East - "F-R" Farm-Rural District Adiacent Land Use: North, South, East - Undeveloped land. West - Office and athletic club. 6.3 acres 9.8 acres "F-R" Farm-Rural District "B-4" General Business District Agricultural land. For general business development. Not applicable. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-04 (MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd.) Page 2 Number of Residential Units Allowed: "F-R" - 1 unit (1 dwelling unit per 5 acres of land) "B-4" - 228 units (36.30 dwelling units per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: Specialty retail center - 40.67 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area x 30,900 square feet of gross floor area (based on average by ITE Trip Generation) = 1,257 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Adiacent Streets/Classification: a) Northwest Boulevard - arterial Right-of-Way Design Current: a) 150-foot right-of-way with an 82-foot wide rural paved section. Planned: a) Same as current. 2001 Traffic Count (24-hour~ weekday~ non-directional): a) 27,669 vehicles per day (east of County Road 69). Zoninu History of Property: In December 1995, as part of a larger area, the south 200 feet of the subject property was annexed into the City and zoned an "F-R" District. Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases: May 2002, Riverside Hospital Tract, Block 1, Lot 2, located on the south side of Northwest Boulevard at the Wildcat Drive intersection and east of the subject property was granted a change of zoning from "AB" Disthct to "B-4" District. August 2001, 3.5 acres out of Nueces River Irrigation Park, Section 2, Lot 1, located on the south side of Northwest Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of County Road 69 and north of the subject property was granted a change of zoning from "FR" District to "B-4" District. Zoning Report Ca~e No. 0802-04 (MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd.) Page 3 In December 1999, the area along the northeast side of Riverwood Drive and northwest of the subject property, was annexed into the City and zoned a :'R-lB" District. In November 1998, Lot 1, Encino Park, located on the south side of Northwest Boulevard and west of the subject property, was granted a change of zoning fi:om a "F-R" District to a "B-4" District for a landscape nursery operation. In March 1997, the adjacent tract to the west was granted a change of zoning fi:om a "F-R" Dis~ict to a "B4" District and developed a gymnasium, batting cages, and offices. In November 1994, the property at the northeast comer of Northwest Boulevard and Riverwood Drive and north of the subject property, was granted a change of zoning fi:om a "F-R" District to a "Bo4" District. Zoning Inventory,: The subject property is part of a 26.45-acre tract of farmland zoned a "F-R" District. To the north is 3.5 acres of undeveloped "B-4" District property. Adjacent to the west, the area contains 18.67 acres of land that is zoned a "B-4" District and developed with a mixture of auto-related use~, mini- storage, landscape nursery and a sports gym. West of the "B-4" District area is 485 acres of farmland zoned a "F-R" District. Northwest from the subject property there is a 2.46-acre tract of land zoned an "AB" District and a 1.22-acre tract of land zoned a "B-4" District. The "AB" District area contains a church and the "B-4" District contains a veterinary clinic. Planning Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and Background: The applicant has requested a change of zoning fi:om "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District, in order to develop the property with a general business use. The subject property is the south 6.3-acres of a 3.5-acre tract fronting Northwest Boulevard. The north 3.5-acres are zoned with a "B-4" District. The subject property and the adjoining north property are planned as a joint development. Access to the subject property is proposed through the adjoining "B-4" District property to the north that has direct access to Northwest Boulevard. Northwest Boulevard is approximately 525 feet north of the subject property. There are no existing residences abutting the subject property. The adjoining land to the north, south and east is being used as farmland. West of the subject property, the land is zoned a "B-4" District and developed with offices, batting cages, an athletic gym, and a landscape nursery. Approval of the "B4" District would be an expansion of the adjacent "B-4" District to the west and north. The subject property is in the corridor that the Northwest Area Development Plan recommends development with general commercial uses. With no abutting residences, the impact of expanding the "B-4" District would be minimal on the surrounding area. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-04 (MTM Northwest, Inc. & MT/vi Northwest, Ltd.) Page 4 As a point of information for future rezoning cases, staff suggest that as the south side of Northwest Boulevard develops the "B-4" District should not be expanded further north than the established Encino Park Subdivision "B-4" District north boundary line measuring 600 feet to Noffiawest Boulevard. The City Transportation Plan provides for a collector street system to extend west near the Encino Park Subdivision "B-4" District south boundary line. The proposed collector would serve future residential and office development. Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "B-4" District because the proposed development adjoins the property to the north that has direct access to an arterial and does not traverse a residential area. The Northwest Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with general commercial uses. The requested "B-4" District is consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. Potential Housing Density: The "F-R" District permits a density of one dwelling unit for every five (5) acres or one (I) unit on the subject property. A "B-4" District allows a density 36.30 dwelling units per acre or 228 units on the subject property. The increase in density will not adversely impact the abutting area. Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: There are no required setbacks or building height limitations in the "F-R" District. The "B-4" District requires a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet and no side or rear yard setback unless adjacent to a residential district where a minimum setback often (10) feet is required along that adjacency. Building heights are also unlimited in the "B4" District. Signage: The "F-R" District permits one non-illuminated temporary freestanding sign to advertise products sold at the temporary sales stand. This sign is limited to a sign area of forty (40) square feet and a height of 35 feet. Wall signs and freestanding signs in the "B-4" District are unlimited as to size height and number provided the signs are located behind the front yard setback. Freestanding signs in the front yard are limited to one sign per street frontage with an area not to exceed forty (40) square feet and a height of 25 feet. Traffic: Access for the property is proposed through the north property fxonting Northwest Boulevard (F. M. 624), an arterial. As the property develops as a business use an increase in traffic will occur that will minimally impact the street system. Parking/Screening: Business/Retail development is required to provide one off-street parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. Compliance with the off-street parking requirements will be required during the permitting phase of the development. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet, is required when a business or industrial use abuts a residential district. If the subject property is granted a "B-4" District, a standard screening will be required along the south and east property lines. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-04 (MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd.) Page 5 * Costs to Cit~: The infrastructure required to serve the subject property is available through the adjacent north property and no costs to the City are anticipated. Platting: A plat is required. (Ideas in support of the request.) The requested "B-4" District is an expansion of the adjacent "B-4" District to the north and west. The requested "B-4" District is consistent with the Northwest Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map. The subject property does not abut an existing residential development. (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.) Approval of the "B-4" District would encourage continued commercial strip development along Northwest Boulevard. Approval. Zoning and Ownership Map Ownership List a) b) c) Cons: a) Staff Recommendation: Attachments: H:~PLN-DIR\ERMA\WORDkZONRPTS\0802~4CCREPORT.DOC B-4 ~-IB B-4 PARC'B. -R -4 PARK F-R F-R Aug 15, 2002- RP CASE Z0802-04 · - Property Owner in Favor X Property Owner Opposed See Comments on Page(s) _ Subject property Owners within 20{) feet lieted on ottoched ownership list Applicant: MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd. 4045 Bobwhite Robstown, Texas 78380 1 Z0802-04 484800010010 MARTIN GARY L 617 LOG COUNTRY COVE BURNET TX 78611 MARTIN PLAZA LT 1 BLK 1 OVfNERSHIP LIST CASE NO. 0802-04 Representative: Darren Patterson RVE, Inc. P. O. Box 2927 78403 1 Z0802-04 484800010020 MARTIN GARY L 617 LOG COUNTRY COVE BURNET TX 78611 MARTIN PLAZA LT 2 BLK 1 2 Z0802-04 587400020011 TAYLOR JACK AND WILLIAM E MORNEAU II 4045 BOBWHITE ROBSTOWN TX 78380 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK 9.87 ACS OUT OF W/3 OF E 3/4 OUT OF LT 1 BLK 2 3 Z0802-04 587400020072 DRISCOLL FOUNDATION 615 NORTH UPPER BROADWAY SUITE 1635 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78477 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK 75.60 ACS OUT 155.6 AC TR OUT LTS 7 TO 10 BLK 2, ICL 4 Z0802-04 587400020005 HABEEB ANDY, TRUSTEE 4405 ASPEN ST CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK UND1V/4 INT IN 20.12 ACS OUT E/2 LT 1 BLK 2 4 Z0802-04 587400020010 FROST NTL BNK OF SAN ANTO RAYMOND G BAYDER ISSUE TR P O BOX 1600 SAN ANTONIO TX 78296 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK UNDIV/4 INT IN 20.12 ACS OUT E/2 LT 1 BLK 2 4 Z0802-04 587400020205 BAYDER RAYMOND G 206 CAUSEWAY ST PORTLAND TX 78374 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK UNDIV/4 INT IN 20.12 ACS OUT E/2 LT 1 BLK 2 4 Z0802-04 587400020210 CANTU NANCY BAYDER REVOCABLE TRUST 5926 S STAPLES STE A-2 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK UNDIV/4 INT IN 20.12 OUT E/2 LT 1 BLK 2 SP Z0802-04 587400020011 TAYLOR JACK AND WILLIAM E MORNEAU II 4045 BOBWI-HTE ROBSTOWN TX 78380 NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION PK 9.87 ACS OUT OF W/3 OF E 3/4 OUT OF LT 1 BLK 2 Z0802-04 DARREN PATTERSON RVE, INC. P. O. BOX 2927 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78403 Z0802-04 CHARLES SCHROEDTER RIVER RIDGE HOMEOWNER'S ASSN. 13901 R1VERWAY DR. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 Z0802-04 JAMES WARLICK, SUPT. CALALLEN I.S.D. 4205 WILDCAT DR. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 Z0802-04 DAVID CROFT WOODRIVER HOMEOWNER'S ASSN. 4033 WOOD RIVER DR. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 Z0802-04 PEGGY BAI'~ALES 3134 SEVEN TREES CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78410 COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0802-04 MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd. · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED (Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.) Notices returned from within the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. II. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. III. Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. H:kPLN-DIRkERMA\WORD\COMMDATA\0802-O4COMMENTS,DOC Plannin3 Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd.: 0802-04 REQUEST: "F-R" Farm-Rural Dis~ict to "B-4" General Commercial Business District on property described as being 6.308 acres out of 9.808 acres, Nueces River Irrigation Park, west 1/3 of the east ~ of Lot 1, Section 2, and located approximately 550 feet south of Northwest Boulevard and 525 feet west of County Road 69. Ms. Goode-Macon presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and surrounding area. The subject property is part of a 26.45-acre tract of farmland zoned a "F-R" District. To thenorthis3.5acresofundeveloped"B-4"Districtproperty. Adjacent to the west, the area contaius 18.67 acres of land that is zoned a "B-4" District and developed with a mixture of auto-related uses, mini-storage, landscape nursery and a sports gym_ West of the "B-4" District area is 485 acres of farmland zoned a "F- R" District. Northwest from the subject property there is a 2.46-acre tract of land zoned an "AB" District and a 1.22-acre tract of land zoned a "B-4" District. The "AB" District area contains a church and the "B- 4" Distxict contains a veterinary clinic. The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District, in order to develop the propen'y with a general business use. The subject property is the south 6.3-acres of a 3.5-acre lxact fronting Northwest Boulevard. The north 3.5-acres are zoned with a "B4" District. The subject property and the adjoining north propen*y are planned as a joint development. Access to the subject property is proposed through the adjoining "B4" District property to the north that has direct access to Northwest Boulevard. Northwest Boulevard is approximately 525 feet north of the subject property. There are no existing residences abutting the subject property. The adjoining land to the north, south and east is being used as farmland. West of the subject property, the land is zoned a "B-4" District and developed with offices, batting cages, an athletic gym, and a landscape nursery. Approval of the "B-4" District would be an expansion of the adjacent "B-4" District to the west and north. The subject property is in the corridor that the Northwest Area Development Plan recommends development with general commercial uses. With no abutting residences, the impact of expanding the "B- 4" District would be minimal on the surrounding area. As a point of information for future rezoning cases, staff suggest that as the south corridor of Northwest Boulevard develops the "B-4" District should not expand further southwest then the established Encino Park Subdivision "B-4" District south boundary line. The City Transportation Plan shows that a collector street systems is to extend west near the Encino Park Subdivision "B-4" District south boundary line. The proposed collector would serve future residential development in this corridor. The Northwest Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with general commemial uses. The requested "B4" District is consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. Therefore, staffrecommends approval as submitted. There were 13 notices mailed 0 in favor 0 in opposition. Public hearing opened. Pat Veteto, 820 Buffalo, represented the applicant. He said that there are discussions that a portion of the property may be used for storage. Public hearing closed. In response to Commissioner Richter, Ms. Goode-Macon said that the road to the south of the subject property is the proposed extension of County Road 52. Motion by Zamora, seconded by Salazar, to forward a recommendation of approval. Motion passed. ,tO PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT'S REQUEST AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY MTM NORTHWEST, INC. & MTM NORTHWEST, LTD., BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 6.308 ACRES OUT OF 9.888 ACRES OF THE WEST 113 OF THE EAST 3/4 OF LOT 1, SECTION 2, NUECES IRRIGATION PARK, FROM "F-R" FARM-RURAL DISTRICT TO "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of MTM Northwest, Inc. & MTM Northwest, Ltd. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 28, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1, That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on 6.308 acres out of 9.808 acres of the west 1/3 of the east 3/4 of Lot 1, Section 2, Nueces River Irrigation Park, located approximately 550 feet south of Northwest Boulevard and 525 feet west of County Road 69. from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "B-4" General Business District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of ^ugust, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. ~LEGAL~LAVV~LEG~D~R~D~y~eD~urtisV~YD~CS~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Z~ning~rd~)~YLEC~2~2~Z~8~2~4A~MTMN~rth~west~nc~rd j~pp,&PC,doc /! Page 2 of 3 SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy affached, the City Council (f) finds and declsres an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22nd day of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 11 October, 2002 James R. Bray, Jr. By: Doyle I~../l~u rtis Senior A~ssistant City Attorney ~LEGAL~-AW~LEG-D~R~D~y~eD~urtis~YD~C~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Z~n~ng~rd~D~YLE~2~Z~8~2~4A~MTMN~rth~west~nc~rd~App~&PC`d~c /£ August 6, 2002 645-02017 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Field notes of a 6.308 acre tract out ora 9.808 acre tract. Said 9.808 acre tract being out of the West 1/3 of the East 3/4 of Lot One (1), Section Two (2), Nueces River Irrigation Park, a subdivision in the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, as shown by map or plat, recorded in Volume "A", Page 54, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, and by deed recorded in Volume 595, Page 358, Deed Records, Nueces County, Texas, and said 6.308 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8" iron md found on the south line of said Lot 1, Section 2, at the southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 1, Martin Plaza, as shown by map, recorded in Volume 58, Page 75, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, also the southwest comer of said 9.808 acre tract, and the BEGINNING POINT and southwest comer of said 6.308 acre tract; THENCE N 09055'00'' E along the east line of said Lot 2, Block 1, Martin Plaza and west line of said 9.808 acre tract, a distance of 987.73 feet to a point for the northwest comer of said 6.308 acre tract; THENCE S 80o05'00'' E a distance of 281.01 feet to a point for the northeast comer of said 6.308 acre tract; THENCE S 09o55'00'' W along the east line of said 9.808 acre tract, a distance of 967.64 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for the southeast comer of said 9.808 acre tract and the southeast comer of said 6.308 acre tract; EXHIBIT A /~ Property Description August 6, 2002 Page 2 ~ THENCE N 84°10'18'' W alonE the south line of said 9.808 acre tract and south line of said 6.308 acre tract, a distance of 281.73 feet to the BEGINNING POINT and containing 6.308 acres, more or less. Prepared by: RVE, Inc. August 6. 2002 18 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: October 22, 2002) Case No. 0802-05~ The Enclave Council of Co-owners~ Inc.: A change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District on 0.07 acre out of Gardendale No. 1, Block 6, Lot 7-A, located 375 feet west of South Staples Street, 300 feet north of Cain Drive and 275 feet south of Bonnet Drive. Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation 1108/28/02): Denial of the "B-I' Neighborhood Business District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District with a "SP" Special Permit for a parking lot. Requested Council Action: Denial of the "B-I" Neighborhood Business District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a "R-1B" One-family Dwelling Dislrict with a "SP" Special Permit for a parking lot and adoption of the atlached ordinance. Purpose of Request: For unenclosed parking lot. Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District in order to coustmct an unenclosed parking lot with ten (10) stalls on the subject property. The subject property is a 0.07-acre parcel located to the rear of a residential lot in the Gardendale Subdivision. A representative from the Enclave stated that clients patronizing the office complex are experiencing a shortage in parking. Furthermore, he also added that there are no plans to expand the existing facility whereby additional parking would be needed. The area north of the subject property is to remain as a single-family dwelling and is proposed to be replatted once rezoned. Access to the subject property will be provided through existing driveways of the Enclave complex located on South Staples Street and Cain Drive. The subject property is part of the Gardendale Subdivision that is developed primarily with single-family dwellings and zoned "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District. Business zoning is contained along the exterior boundaries of the Gardendale Subdivision. In 2000, a comprehensive study of the Gardendale area was undertaken as a component of the Southside Area Development Plan. The adopted Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the subject property remain low-density residential. Extending the "B-I" District into the Gardendale Subdivision is contrary to the Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map and could encourage business rezoning further into Gardendale. Planning commtssion recorranends the subject property remain zoned as "R-1B' District, but approval of a Special Permit for the additional 10 parking spaces. Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning commission and Staff's recommendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, twenty-five (25) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which eight were returned in favor and none in opposition. The applicant and owner of the subject property submitted a notice in favor. This is a noncontroversial case. x MG~G~er Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 2 Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Comments Received 3) Planning Commission Minutes 4) Ordinances Pages Pages Pages Pages 3-10 11-12 13-14 15-22 H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~AGENDMEiVfi0802-05AGENDAMEMO.DOC CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: 0802-05 August 28, 2002 H16C The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc. Being 0.07 acre out of Gardendale No. 1, Block 6, Lot 7-A, located 375 feet west of South Staples Street, 300 feet north of Cain Drive and 275 feet south of Bonner Drive. 0.07 acre 0.34 acre "R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District "B-I" Neighborhood Business District Single-family residence. Unenclosed parking lot. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Adiacent Zoning: Not applicable. North, East, West - "R~ lB" One-family Dwelling District South - "B- 1" Neighborhood Business District Adiacent Land Use: North, East, West - Single-family residences. South- Office complex. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 2 Number of Residential Units Allowed: "R-lB" - 0 units (7.26 dwelling units per acre) "B-I" - 2 units (36.30 dwelling units per acre) "B-4" - 2 units (36.30 dwelling units per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: Parking lot for existing use - Not applicable. Adjacent Streets/Classification: a) South Staples Street - arterial b) Cain Drive - local c) Bonner Drive - local Rieht-of-Wav Design Current: a) 120-foot right-of-way with a 76-foot back-to-back paved section. b) 60-foot right-of-way with a 40-foot back-to-back paved section. c) 60-foot right-of-way with a 40-foot back-to-back paved section. Planned: a,b,c,) Same as current. 12/2001 Traffic Count {24-hour~ weekda¥~ non-directional): a) 40,239 vehicles per day Zoning History of Property: There has been no rezoning activity within the past five years. Recent Surrounding Zoning Cases: In May 2002, Gardendale Unit 2, Block 4, Lot 19B, located on the west side of South Staples Street, was rezoned from a "B-I" District to a "B-4" District for a retail paint store. In July 2000, as part ora comprehensive rezoning, properties along both sides of Williams Drive were rezoned from "R-lB", "R-2", and "AB" Districts to "B-lA" District. Zoning Report Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 3 In December 1998, Lots 14 and 15, located on the south side of Williams Drive, west of S. Staples Street, were granted a change of zoning from "R-lB" District to "R-2" District. The rear 200 feet of Lot 15 received a Special Permit for an office and storage associated with the tire store adjacent to the east. In July 2000, as part of the comprehensive rezoning of Williams Drive, these lots were rezoned to a "B-lA" District and the Special Permit modified for storage uses associated with the tire store to the east. In March 1996 Lots 16A, 16B, and 17, located on the southwest comer of Curtis Clark Drive and S. Staples Street, were granted a change of zoning from a "B-I" District to a "B-4' District. In August 1995, Lots 18 through 20, located on the northwest comer of Williams Drive and South Staples Street were granted a change of zoning from a "B-I" District to a "B-4" Dislfict. Lot 17 was granted a change of zoning from "R-lB" District to a B-I" District. In September 1994, Lot lB, Block 1 Glen Arbor 3, located on the east side of S. Staples Street, south of Curtis Clark Drive, was granted a change of zoning fi'om a "R-lB" District to a "B-I" District. Zoning Inventor~: The subject property is part of 160 acres of land zoned a "R-lB" Dislrict in Gardendale Unit 1 that is developed with single-family residences. Adjacent to the south is 4.39 acres of land zoned a '~B-I" District containing an office complex and a convenience store. To the south across Cain Drive is a church zoned with a "B-I" District on 2.97acres. Northeast along South Staples Street is 3.44 acres of"B4" District property developed with a mattress company, pottery store, vacuum cleaner shop, a picture framing establishment and a variety of other business uses. Planning Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and Background: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-1" Neighborhood Business District in order to construct an unenclosed parking lot with ten (10) stalls on the subject property. The subject property is a 0.07-acre parcel located to the rear ora residential lot in the Gardendale Subdivision. A representative from the Enclave stated that clients patronizing the office complex are experiencing a shortage in parking. Furthermore, he also added that there are no plans to expand the existing facility whereby additional parking would be needed. The area north of the subject property is to remain as a single-family dwelling and is proposed to be replatted once rezoned. Access to the subject property will be provided through existing driveways of the Enclave complex located on South Staples Street and Cain Drive. The subject property is part of the Gardendale Subdivision that is developed primarily with single-family dwellings and zoned "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District. Business zoning is contained along the exterior boundaries of the Gardendale Subdivision. In 2000, a Zomng Report Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 4 comprehensive study of the Gardendale area was undertaken as a component of the Southside Area Development Plan. The adopted Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the subject property remain low-density residential. Extending the "B-I" District into the Gardendale Subdivision is contrary to the Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map and could encourage business rezoning further into Gardendale. Planning Commission recommends the subject property remain zoned as "R-lB" District, but approval of a Special Permit for the additional 10 parking spaces. Conformity to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility: Overall the Comprehensive Plan Elements cannot be supportive of the requested "B-I" District. The Southside Area Development Plan's adopted land use map recommends the area to develop with low-density residential uses. The requested "B-I" District is inconsistent with the Plan's recommended land use map. Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: The "R-lB" District requires a front yard of 25 feet with a side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet each. A "B-I" District requires a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet with no side or rear yard setback unless adjacent to a residential district where a side and rear yard often (10) feet is required along the residential adjacency. The subject property has residential adjacency to the north, east and west. Building height in a "R-lB" and "B-I" Districts are limited to 35 feet not to exceed three (3) stories. Signage: Signs in the "R-lB" District are limited to one wall sign not to exceed one square foot. The "B-i" District permits unlimited wall signs and one freestanding sign with a sign area of forty (40) square feet and a height of twenty (20) feet. Parking/Screening: Compliance with parking lot construction regulations will be required during the permitting phase. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet is required along the side property line where a business or industrial use locates adjacent to a residential district. A standard screening fence is required along the north, east and west property lines of the subject property, due to its residential adjacency. · Cost to City: The change in zoning will not necessitate any expenditures by the City. · Platting: Replatting is required. Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) a) The requested "B-I" District is an expansion of the adjacent "B-I" District to the south. b) A Special Permit could be granted to accommodate the proposed parking use. Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co.-owners, Inc.) Page 5 Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.) a) Approval of the "B-1" District would encourage rezoning of the Gardendale residential subdivision to commercial development. b) The requested "B-1" District is inconsistent with the Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map. Staff Recommendation: Denial of the "B-I" Neighborhood Business District, and in lieu thereof, grant an "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District with a Special Permit for a parking lot. Attachments: Zoning and Ownership Map Ownership List H:~PLN-DIR\ERMA\WORDkZONRPTS\0802-05CCREPORT,DOC 7 10 11D Aug 15, 2002 - RP CASE Z0802-05 · - Property Owner in Favor X Property Owner Opposed See Comments on Page(s) _ ~'~ Subject property ~ Owners within 200 feet listed on attoched ownership list OWNERSItlP LIST CASE NO. 0802-05 Applicant: The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc. c/o Robert L. Steel, V.P. 5525 S. Staples, Ste. B-2 78411 1 Z0802-05 270200060050 C~ONZALES ARNOLD 110 OCEAN VIEW CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE SE/2 LT 5 BLK 6 2 Z0802-05 270200060055 DOM1NGUEZ JAVIER F 4614 DODY CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE NW/2 LT 5 BLK 6 3 Z0802-05 270200060060 REYES BERTA M 5505 BONNER DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE LT 6B BLK 6 1 Z0802-05 270200060065 GONZALES ARNOLD 110 OCEAN VIEW CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE W/2 LT 6 BLK 6 4 Z0802-05 270200060070 GARCIA HILARIO JR 5509 BONN-ER DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE LT 7A BLK 6 5 Z0802-05 270200060075 BENNING JAMES R 4626 DEEPI~ALE DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 GARDENDALE LT 7B BLK 6 6 Z0802-05 270200060104 GOODMAN DON ETUX GAIL GOODMAN 3908 VERNER CIR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78415 GARDENDALE LT 10D BLK 6 7 Z0802-05 270200060120 SISTO JOSEPH C/O GARY SISTO 4109 AVONDALE #109 DALLAS TX 75219 GARDENDALE LTS 12A & 12B BLK 6 8 Z0802-05 270200060137 BENADUM GERALD L 4501 LAKE CHARLES DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 GARDEN-DALE LT 13C BLK 6 8 Z0802-05 270200060139 BENADUM GERALD L 4501 LAKE CHARLES DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 GARDENDALE LT 13D BLK 6 9 Z0802-05 272500000020 RITZ MARY L BOX 8228 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78408 GARDENDALE GIN TRACT LT B 10 Z0802-05 272500000040 BENCARHILL INC. 5505 S STAPLES CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE GIN TRACT LTD llC Z0802-05 232600010070 TURNER BETTY NOBLE P O BOX 2529 PORT ARANSAS TX 78373 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 7 & 3.94 PERCENT INT IN GCE IlC Z0802-05 232600010050 HEAVIN WILLIAM H JR AND CYNTHIA A HEAVIN 7034 ADBURY CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 5 & 3.31 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600010020 JANOSEK JOSEPH P ETUX 318 CAPE MAY DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 2 & 3.42 PERCENT INT IN GCE q Ownership List Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 2 IIC 7_,0802-05 232600010010 OVERSTREET HARRY L II AKA HARRY & KATHY OVERSTR 5525 STAPLES STE A-1 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 1 & 4.19 PERCENT INT IN GCE IlC Z0802-05 232600010060 ABOUD MICHAEL LOUIS ETU'X ELIZABETH A ABOUD 5525 S STAPLES ST # A-6 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 6 & 3.0 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600010080 MORRIS WAYNE H ET UX 4522 LAKE BISTINEAU DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78413 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 8 & 4.62 PERCENT INT IN GCE I1C Z0802-05 232600020020 ARLENE STEEL REALTORS, IN P 0 BOX 81344 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78412 THE ENCLAVE BLDG B STE 2-S & 11.85 PERCENT lINT IN GCE I1C Z0802-05 232600020040 MARTIN DUANE W AND PATRICIA TYSON MARTIN 5525 S STAPLES #B4 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG B STE 4 & 6.88% INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600030010 INGRAHAM RICHARD L ET UX 5525 S STAPLES, STE C-1 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG C STE 1 & 11.04 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600050010 GSP VENTURES, L.L.C. % THE ENCLAVE 5525 S STAPLES #B-2 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG E STE I & i 1.10 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600050020 GSP VENTURES, LL.C. % THE ENCLAVE 5525 S STAPLES #B-2 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG E STE 2 & 4.10 PERCENT EqT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600050030 GSP VENTURES, L.L.C. % THE ENCLAVE 5525 S STAPLES #B-2 CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG E STE 3 & 8.09 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600010030 JANOSEK JOSEPH P 5525 S STAPLES STE 3-J CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 3-J & 1.51 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600010040 BERLOCHER WILLIAM C 5525 S STAPLES STE 4-B CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG A STE 4~B & 7.45 PERCENT INT IN GCE llC Z0802-05 232600040010 ARLENE STEEL REALTORS, IN 5525 S STAPLES ST CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 THE ENCLAVE BLDG D STE 1 & 15.42 PERCENT INT IN GCE SP Z0802-05 270200060070 GARCIA HILARIO JR 5509 BONNER DR CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78411 GARDENDALE LT 7A BLK 6 · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED COIVRvlENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0802-05 The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc. (Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.) Notices returned fi.om within the 200-foot notification area: II. Favor: 3) Bertha M. Reyes, 5505 Bonner Dr. No written comment. 5) James R. Benning, 5503 S. Staples St. No written comment. 11 C) G.S.P. Venture, L.L.C. by Gene Graham, President, 5525 S. Staples, Ste. B-2 No written comment. 11 C) William H. Heavin, 7034 Adbury Dr. No written comment. I lC) Richard L. Ingraham, D.D.S., 5525 S. Staples, Bldg. C No written comment. 11 C) Joseph P. Janosek, 5525 S. Staples, B-2 No written comment. 1 lC) Lee Overstreet, D.D.S., 5525 S. Staples, A-1 No written comment. l lC) Arlene Steel Realtors, Inc., 5525 S. Staples St. No written comment. Opposition: None. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Comments Received Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 2 III. Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: Hilario Garcia, (owner), 5509 Bonner Dr. No written comment. Robert L. Steel, V.P., (applican44 No written comment. Opposition: None. H:~PLN-DIR~ERMA\WORD\COMMDATA\0802-05COMMENTS DOC Plnnnin$ Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.: 0802-05 REQUEST: "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-I" Neighborhood Business District prope~y described as being 0.07 acre out of Gardendale No. 1, Block 6, Lot 7-A and located 375 feet west of South Staples Street, 300 feet north of Cain Drive and 275 feet south of Bonner Drive. Ms. Goode-Macon presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and thc surrounding area. The subject property is part of 160 acres of land zoned a "R-lB" District in Gardendale Unit 1 that is developed with single-family residences. Adjacent to the south is 4.39 acres of land zoned a "B-I" District cont~inlng an office complex and a convenience store. To the south across Cain Drive is a church zoned with a "B-I" District on 2.97acres. Northeast along South Staples Street is 3.44 acres of "B- 4" District property developed with a mattress company, pottery store, vacuum cleaner shop, a picture framing establishment and a variety of other business uses. The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B~I" Neighborhood Business District in order to construct an unenclosed parking lot with ten (10) stalls on the subject property. The subject property consists of a 0.07-acre area of land that is located to the rear of a residential lot in the Gardendale Subdivision. The owner of the subject property intends to sell the area of request to the Enclave office complex, located to the south, for the purpose of developing an additional parking area. The representative oftha Enclave has indicated that clients patronizing the office complex are experiencing a shortage in parking. Furthermore, the representative stated that the Enclave does not have plans to expand its existing facility whereby, additional parking would be needed. The sole purpose of the request is to provide additional parking to accommodate its patrons in the existing complex. The area north of the subject property is to remain as a single-family dwelling and is proposed for roplatting subject to the rezoning and sell of the subject property, per the owner and applicant. The applicant indicated that the subject property and the Enclave complex would be replatted as one lot, contingent on a favorable rezoning or approval of a Special Permit for parking. Access to the subject property will be provided through existing driveways of the Enclave complex that are located along South Staples Stront and Cain Drive. The subject property is part of the Gardendale Subdivision that is developed primarily with single-family dwellings and zoned "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District. Business zoning is contained along the exterior boundaries of the Gardendale Subdivision. In 2000, a comprehensive study of the Gardendale area was undertaken as a component of the Southside Area Development Plan. Results of the Plan initiated a change of zoning on properties along Williams Drive and Holly Road to a "B-lA" Neighborhood Business District. The adopted Soutbside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the subject property remain low-density residential. Extending the "B-I" District into the Gardendale Subdivision is contrary to the Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map and could activate request for business rezoning further into Gardendale. Staff recommends the area of request to remain a "R-lB" Distxict. The Southside Area Development Plan's adopted land use map recommends the area to develop with low-density residential uses. The requested "B-I" District is inconsistent with the Plan's recommended land use map. Therefore, staffrecommends denial of the rezoning request. There were 25 notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of which eight (8) were returned in favor, including one from the owner, and none were received in opposition. Robert L. Steele, 5322 River Oaks, said that the Enclave started in 1983. There is sufficient parking according to city standards, but there is a doctor that needs additional parking. The additional parking would be only about 10 spaces. The lot is 300 feet deep and contains a single-farnily home. The parking would be 30 feet by 99 feet wide. The "B-I" District would keep the zoning consistent when they were to replat the property. He responded to the ComnUssion by saying that the Enclave uses the Gardendale Baptist Church parking area when necessary as agreed upon by the two pat~ies. He said that he could not guarantee that they would not appear again for additional parking. He also said that he has spoken with Circle K on the northwest comer of Cain Street about purchasing the lot. plannin~ Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Case No. 0802-05 (The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc.) Page 2 Commissioner Smith said that he visited the property and that he believed that the parking lot would be beneficial to the Enclave. The slxncture of the house is near Bonner Drive and would have ample back yard if the parking lot were developed. There could be an imaginary line drawn from the north end of the Goodman Mattress Company along Lot 7B for the additional 30 feet that would provide parking for the Enclave. Commissioner Salazar concurred. Commissioner Amsler said that he believed that the highest and best use for the Gardendale area is not residential but commercial. He compared the area to the Galleria area in Houston. He said that he was not opposed to the request, but preferred that the applicant at~empt to purchase the rear portion of Lot 7B to "square off" the lot. Gene Graham, 13702 Primavera, president of GSP ventures, said that he was in favor of the request. Public hearing closed. Motion Salazar, seconded by Smith, to deny the request for "15-1" District, and in lieu thereof approve a Special Permit for an unenclosed parking with conditions set forth by the pJanning Department. Motion passed with Mires, Pusley, Richter, and Zamora voting Nay. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE ENCLAVE COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS, INC., BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 0.07 ACRE OUT OF LOT 7-A, BLOCK 6, GARDENDALE NO. I SUBDIVISION (CURRENTLY ZONED "R-lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT) BY GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN UNENCLOSED PARKING LOT SUBJECT TO A SITE PLAN AND FIVE (5) CONDITIONS; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 28,2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Chdsti, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Chdsti, Texas, is amended by granting a Special Permit for an unenclosed parking lot on 0.07 acre out of Lot 7-A, Block 6, Gardendale No. 1 Subdivision (currently zoned "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District), located 375 feet west of South Staples Street, 300 feet of Cain Drive and 275 feet south of Bonner Drive. SECTION 2. That the Special Permit granted in Section I of this Ordinance is subject to a site plan attached as Exhibit A and the following five (5) conditions: USES: The only use permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R-lB' One-family Dwelling District is an unenclosed parking lot with'ten (10) spaces. PARKING SURFACE: The parking surface of the subject property shall be of an impervious surface to accommodate parked vehicles. ACCESS: Vehicular access to Bonner Street is prohibited from the subject property. ~-EGAL~Vv~EG-D~R~D~y~eDcurtis~MYD~cS~2~2~P&Z~RD~2~Z~ning~rd~D~YLEc~2~2~z~8~2~5B~Enc~ave~c~wnem~rd~SP~PC~d~c Page 2 of 3 SCREENING: A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet shall be installed and placed along the north, east, and west property lines. TIME LIMIT: The Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. SECTION 3. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. That upon wdtten request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (f) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22ND day of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt 1 October, 2002 James R. Bray, Jr. By: ._.~....J. ~..(..,J/~ (~_ (' .~_.~ Doyle I~j-/~,urt~ - - - Senior Assistant City Attorney ~LEGAL~-AVwLEC--D~R\D~y~eDcurt~s~MYD~cS~2~P&z~RD~2~Z~ning~rd~D~YLE~2~2~Z~8~2~5B~Enc~ave~wners~rd~SP~PC~d~c PPing Your AuSU~t .5, 2002 Li~ose Number EXHIBIT A / ,~ X42. �. • . L oT -7 A s: > 446 gg.9s •�DUIt� tiles/ � t SGNING, 1=Et•lGi=. �D r L — _$_6*1000'40' E 198_0 l FUTURE PARKOG 1 ) ,� L �. 46.55' XA Fc.e=44.2 ' I F.L/2'=44. ' — -- —46.46' • I 46.95' I e�tt}u law INIhH�fl - I O I z.. I CL 25>4.wat4on hty 46.76' 47.20' 47.50' VjP-o`' Lkr. zbtepeml 2 C :n APPLICANT'S REQUEST AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY THE ENCLAVE COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS, INC. BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 0.07 ACRE OF LOT 7-A, BLOCK 6, GARDENDALE NO.1, FROM "R-'lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "B-I" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of The Enclave Council of Co-owners, Inc. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, August 28, 2002, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on 0.07 acre of Lot 7A, Block 6, Gardendale No. 1, located 375 feet west of South Staples Street, 300 feet north of Cain Drive and 275 feet south of Bonner Drive. from 'R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District. The 0.007 acre is descried by metes and bounds on the attached Exhibit ^. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section I of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. ~EGAL~-AVWLEG-DIR~DoyleDC urtlst~VlYDOCS~002~P&ZO RD02~.oning .ord~3OYLEC~002~Z080205A.Enclave,Co,owners. Ord J~op,doc Page 2 of 3 SECTION $. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (f) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 22nd day of October, 2002. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM ONLY 11 October, 2002 James R. Bray, Jr. 'Doyl~~- SeniortAssistant City Attorney ~EGAL~J~,W~.EG-DIR~DoyleDC urtis~MYDOC S~2002~P&ZO R D02~.o ning .ord~DOYLEC~2002~Z080205A. Enclave. Co.owners. Ord .App.doc 710 BuffMo Corpus CIl~t~ti, TX 78401 Pping ¥o 3011~81-~044 ln~.i .I) NOTES DI~CRZFT/ON 0.07 ac~e~ ~ 2,.9~.:~9 aqua~ fe:t ofland' out ofLo~ 7-A, Block 6 of lhe Ga.rdendale No_ 1 SubdJvis~l, accoa~ng ~o the plat mc4xded in ¥olun~ 27, Pag~ 49 of the Map Re4x~ls of Nueccs County. Texas. BE~[NNiNG t&t a 5/~ tnch'i~o~ tod v~t~ cap r, ct f~ tlw South ~o,~t of e~kl L°t 7-~Bl~6of~ Os~md~ No. 1 S'ubdiv~on, s~°e bein$ th· West come~ ot'L°t 7-B, f~m~vhich ~ 5/8 tnchh°n md torrid for l~eNmth corn~ off.~t II-A, Block 6 of the Oaxdmdak No' 1 SuixlJv~o~ aCCQT~,~ to tlwplat feconje(j jn ¥olume 49, pa~ 26 ~f ~ie Map lte~ot(b of ~u~es County, Te~as b~ma N ~1° 02' ~" W- 33A$ fe~ ~A'C~I~: N 28~ 4T 4~" E £ 30.00 feet alon~ tl~ Nozthw~st ~ ofs~d Lot 7.B, same being the Sootlwast lins of said Lot 7.A, to a 5/8 inchi~n md ~ c~p set fo~ d~e F-ast eome~ of tlds t~c~ 2'J~(~; N 61" 02' 09" W- 9~$$ f~ct &l°~.tine N°x~-~ lm~ °f this tract t° a 5/8 i~ch k°n md ~ cap ~t for d~c North comer of d~ tract;. .2rj~r~Ar(~: $ 25. 47, 4~" .W - ~0.00 fcct alo~ th~ Southe~t l~e of Lot 6-B, Bl°cl~ 6 °f the+Ga~le4~lalc No. 1 SvlxILvtsion, according to the l~t t~t~led in ¥olume 27, P~g~ 19 of the Map R~v,ds of Nu~es Covx~. Te~s ~md san~ l~-b~ tl~ No~ ~'n~ of a ~t 0.~62a ac~ tm~t oVt ~Lot H, Block ofth~ ~ Sub~v~o~ according to d~ pt~t tccot~led ~ ¥o~"~ $, P~e 21 of the ~ records of Nu~c~ Count. y, Texa~ to a 5/8 inch ~oa tod wt(~ ~p sct for Ih~ W~st c~rnc~ of tlds tz~'~ TZ~'YCE: S 610 02' 09' E - 9~,98 f~t al°n~ tho S°u~ i~ne °f sakT L°t 7-A' Bl°ck 6 s~me bcin~ tim Nordwsst l~ne of sakT Lot 11, Block 6 to 1he F](~CE OF BEGI]~N1NG mad c~' :ai%~ 0-07 ac~es °~ 2,9693~ solute feet oflan~ . 'rl~-lField Notes ][~.sct~ con~tut~ a k~l docun~n~ an~ ~ it ~ppea~ h, m ~a~; in ~ A~t~, 2002 wb 020~05.Goc l~tsu~d l'ma~,sional Land Li~ Numbe~ $$73 EXHIBIT A ,~ i xzk'ry �..,. .. s®ate®o��v 61I5r q8, 9s j 'RZOVLtJE New �jQ<J1TNG �iC2EENlNy p � SGi��NING, FRIG;= 1=>rNtt= ,r eA 5m -------------- --T— — S 61000'40" E_198.00!_ 6. 76, 46.57" 46.50' .9' WA- %+ -66 FUTURE PARKING 1 ,� L D � F.L.B=44.4.2 II — - 46.46 • 46.95 I — — — 47.20 PILL MP FIWIhH CgZ*PM I I Z I II I O_ L -- _- I z_ I 4750' rx-1 F V9 z L 19 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Brookdale Street Improvements from Gollihar to Sunnybrook (Project No. 6157) Whiting Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill to Lanier (Project No. 6t59) BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJECT C-2R AGENDA ITEM: A. Public Hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highways in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: · Brookdale Street Improvements from Gollihar to Sunnybrook · Whiting Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill to Lanier Ordinance closing the public hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highways in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: · Brookdale Skeet Improvements from Gollihar to Sunnybrook · Whiting Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill to Lanier imposing assessments totaling $77,685.74 against property abutting the improvements, affected railways, and property and railway owners; fixing corresponding liens on property and charges against property owners; providing for subsequent adjustment of assessment amounts and the corresponding liens and charges based on as-built conditions; specifying assessment payment terms and lien enforcement measures; and declaring an emergency. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award a construction contract in the amount of $617,998.20 with Garrett Construction for the following: · Brookdale Street Improvements from Gollihar to Sunnybrook · Whiting Sidewalk Improvements from Churchill to Lanier ISSUE: Brookdale Street is a rural road section with inadequate shoulders, roadside ditches, and no sidewalks and need to be reconstructed to urban standards. The existing sidewalks along Whiting are old and uneven for safe pedestrian traffic. Reconstruction will provide smoother riding surfaces, improved drainage, and increased pedestrian safety; and fulfill property owner requests for street and sidewalk improvements. FUNDING: Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Street Bond Fund and Utilities Commercial Paper Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance and Motion as presented. ~) ~/-'A~gel R. E~c~bar, P. E., Director of Engineering Services Additional Support Material: Exhibit "A" Background Information Exhibit "B" Project Budget Exhibit "C" Bid Tabulation Exhibit "D" Location Map SUBJECT: Brookdale Street Improvements (from Gollihar to Sunnybrook) (Project No. 6157) Whiting Sidewalk Improvements (from Churchill to Lanier) (Project No. 6159) BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJECT NO, C-2R PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. November 14, 2000 - Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the Special Election held on November 7, 2000, in the City of Corpus Christi for the adoption of seven propositions; adopting and levying a sales and use tax pursuant to Section 4A of The Development Corporation Act as approved by the voters in Propositions 4 and 5 (Ordinance No. 024269). 2. March 27, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an engineering services contract in the amount of $398,314 with Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, Inc. for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction at the following sites: · Woodlawn Drive · Birmingham Street · Lyons Street · Brookdale Drive · Whiting Drive Sidewalks · Annaville Road PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. October 18, 2000 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms. 2. November 10, 2000 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms. 3. January 10, 2001 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000~08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms. 4. June 20, 2002 - Public Meeting at Fannin Elementary School to inform Property Owners of upcoming construction improvements. BACKGROUND: The Brooklawn Subdivision is an older neighborhood that was originally platted in 1942. The area is comprised of residential house district. The deteriorated condition of the public infrastructure consists of street pavement in peer condition, roadside ditches that provide poor drainage, asphalt/caliche driveways and no sidewalks. The utility water and wastewater lines are old and in need of replacement. The Pineda Park Subdivision is an older neighborhood that was originally platted in 1941. The area is comprised of residential house district. Whiting Drive roadway is currently a curbed gutter section with concrete sidewalks and driveways. The sidewalks and driveways will be re-constructed. A petition submitted May 26, 1989 for Brookdale and October 11, 1990 for Whiting Drive was qualified through the Voluntary Paving Program and approved for funding in the voter approved November 2000 Bond Election. Utility work will be accomplished prior to reconstruction of the street so that street and drainage work need not be disturbed in the future for utility replacement. The project improvements consist of new pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveways and storm drainage, plus water/wastewater improvements on BrookdaJe. Sidewalks and driveways only will be reconstructed on Whiting Drive. H:~IO M E~VELMAR~G EN~STREE'F~157 BROOKDALE~CONSTRUCTIO N~AGENDA BACKGROUND EXHIBIT "A" ~ Page 1 of 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of construction of 1,250 linear feet of 28-foot back-to-back pavement, sidewalks, driveways, 560 linear feet of storm sewer, 1,190 linear feet of sanitary sewer and 1,560 linear feet of water line together with all appurtenances as shown on the plans and called for in the specifications. CONTRACT BIDS: The preliminary assessment roll is based on bid proposals received for the project on Wednesday, July 24, 2002. The project consists of a Base Bid; and Garrett Construction of Ingleside, Texas was the lowest responsible bidder at $617,998.20. The engineer's estimate is $548,638. Five (5) bid proposals were received; and the bids range from $617,998.20 to $877,984.12. CONTRACT TERMS: The contract specifies that the project will be completed in 170 calendar days with completion anticipated by the end of May 2003. FUNDING: Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Street Bond Fund and Utilities Commercial Paper Program. H:'~HOME~VELMAR~G EN~STREE"T~6157 BROO KDA[.E~CONSTRUC¥10 N~AGEN DA BACKGROUND PROJECT BUDGET BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJECT C211 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION BROOKDALE (Project No. 6157) WHITING (Project No. 6159) October 11, 2002 BROOKDALE FUNDS AVAILABLE: Streets........................................................................ $296,044.76 Storm Water.................................................................. 109,077.01 Wastewater.................................................................. 166,167.24 Water........................................................................... 129,829.30 Total................................................................................. $701,118.31 WHITING I TOTAL $73,569.12$369,613.88 FUNDS REQUIRED: 0.00 109,077.01 1 Construction (Garrett Construction Company): 166,167.24 6,975.03 Streets ...................................................... $235,879.70 4,928.05 Storm Water ............................................... 88,472.50 2,902.15 Wastewater ................................................ 140, 254.90 3,422.76 Water ....................................................... 107, 431.10 2,237.56 Subtotal Construction........................................................ 4,237.56 $774,687.43 1,118.31 Contingencies.................................................................... LandAcquisition................................................................ Consultant (Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez) ................................. Consultant (Goldston Engineering, Inc.) ................................. Consultant (James K. Lontos, P. E.) ....................................... Engineering Reimbursements................................................ Finance Reimbursements.................................................... Testing (Rock Engineering)................................................... Bond Issuance Expense(1.25%)............................................. isc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) ............................................. re= otal................................................................................. ., ao WHITING I TOTAL $73,569.12$369,613.88 297.00 0.00 109,077.01 1 0.00 166,167.24 $45,960.00 $281,839.70 0.00 88,472.50 0.00 140,254.90 0.00 107,431.10 72,038.201 $45,960.001 $617 57,203.83 4,596.00 61 2,521.00 297.00 2,818.00 329.73 52.00 381.73 6,975.03 5,000.00 11,975.03 4,928.05 492.86 5,420.91 2,902.15 0.00 2,902.15 3,422.76 796.26 4,219.02 2,237.56 2,000.00 $73,569.121 4,237.56 $774,687.43 1,118.31 HAHOMENELMAMGEN\STREET\6157 BROOKDALEICONSTRUCTIOMPROJECT BUDGET BID TABULATION TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services DATE: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $548,638.00 TIME OF COMPLETION: 170 Calendar Days Page 1 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 HAAS -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, LTD P.O. Box 7692 Co us Christi, TX 78467 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE - AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART A"STREET, SIDEWALK, DRIVES BROOKDALE DRIVE A-1 Street Excavation 4,330 S.Y. $6.80 $29,444.00 $6.20 $26,846.00 $7.501 $32,475.00 A-2 8" Compacted Subgrade With Geogrid 4,330 S.Y. $8.80 $38,104.00 $6.25 $27,062.50 $3.001 $12,990.00 A-3 9"2% Lime Stabilized Caliche Base 4,330 S.Y. $8.80 $38,104.00 $8.70 $37,671.00 $6.50 $28,145.00 A-4 Prime Coat 520 GAL. $2.50 $1,300.00 $2.10 $1,092.00 $3.98 $2,069.60 A-5 2-1/2" HMAC Surface 3,464 S.Y. $6.70 $23,208.80 $8.501 $29,444.00 $6.50 $22,516.00 A-6 6" Curb and Gutter 2,474 L.F. $10.40 $25,729.60 $11.70 $28,945.80 $13.01 $32,186.74 A-7 4' Sidewalk and Turnouts 8,194 S.F. $3.10 $25,401.40 $3.10 $25,401.40 $2.75 j $22,533.50 A-8 Concrete Drives 7,582 S.F. $4.80 $36,393.60 $5.00 $37,910.00 $4.001 $30,328.00 A-9 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $1,363.20 $1,363.20 $7,700.00 $7,700.00 $10,280.50 $10,280.50 A-10 Relocate Signs & Mailboxes 1 L.S. $2,078.90 $2,078.90 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,731.05 $2,73T. -05- 2,731.05A-11 A-1 I Relocate Fence 240 L.F. $8.30 $1,992.00 $11.50 $2,760.00 $14.84 $3,561.60 A-12 Ozone Day 1 EA. $1,942.60 $1,942.60 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $1,186.22 $1,186.22 A-13 Type "A" Header Curb 361 L.F. $7.30 $2,635.30 $12.00 $4,332.00 $16.43 $5,931.23 A-14 Remove Existing Drives 3,015 S.F. $0.90 $2,713.50 $4.00 $12,060.00 $1.98 $5,969.70 A-15 Concrete Ramp Type 7 2 EA. $694.00 $1,368.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $1,235.66 $2,471.32 A-16 Concrete Ramp, Type 3 2 FA. $694.00 $1,388.00 $420.00 $840.00 $1,214.19 $2,428.38 A-17 Remove and Replace Pavement at Gollihar Rd. 88 S.Y. $30.60 $2,692.80 $45.00 $3,960.00 $89.38 $7,865.44 SUBTOTAL PART "A-(fTEMSAI-A17) $235,879.70 $254,224.70 $225,669.28 Page 1 of 10 Page 2 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 HAAS -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, LTD P.O. Box 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 PART B -STORM SEWER BROOKDALE DRIVE B-1 21" RCP 182 L.F. $59.60 $10,847.20 $53.50 $9,737.00 $43.03 $7,831.46 B-2 18" RCP 313 L.F. $51.80 $16,213.40 $45.00 $14,085.00 $36.73 $11,496.49 B-3 15" RCP 106 L.F. $45.30 $4,801.80 $38.00 $4,028.00 $75.13 $7,963.78 B4 Manhole Type "A" 3 E4. $2,719.60 $8,158.80 $3,680.00 $11,040.00 $2,268.88 $6,806.64 B5 5' Curb Inlet 4 EA. $1,554.10 $6,216.40 $1,950.00 $7,800.00 $2,152.07 $8,608.28 B-6 Sidewalk Drains 10 EA. $467.50 $4,675.00 $575.00 $5,750.00 $710.37 $7,103.70 B-7 Topsoil and Grass Seeding 4,785 S.F. $0.10 $478.50 $3.00 $14,355.00 $0.62 $2,966.70 B-8 Topsoil and Grass Sodding 17,380 S.F. $0.50 $8,690.00 $1.00 $17,380.00 $0.92 $15,989.60 B-9 Remove Existing Inlets 2 EA. $1,036.10 $2,072.20 $920.00 $1,840.00 $649.33 $1,298.66 B-10 Trench Safety Plan 601 L.F. $2.60 $1,562.60 $2.30 $1,382.30 $5.02 $3,017.02 B-11 Pollution Prevention Plan 1 L.S. $2,273.20 $2,273.20 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $8,484.90 $8,484.90 B-12 Traffic Control Flan 1 L.S. j $1,363.20 $1,363.20 $1,725.00 $1,725.00 $6,959.11 $6,959.11 B-13 Seal Ditch Openings at Existing Inlets 1 EA. $1,036.10 $1,036.10 $1,150.00 $1,150.00 $675.81 $675.81 B-14 Remove Existing Manholes 4 EA. $1,036.10 $4,144.40 $920.00 $3,680.00 $1,067.44 $4,269.76 B-15 Remove and Replace Pavemt @ Sunnybrook 95 S.Y. $29.70 $2,821.50 $45.00 $4,275.00 $89.41 $8,493.95 B-16 Remove Existing 18" RCP 1,100 L.F. $9.10 $10,010.00 $11.50 $12,650.00 $12.55 $13,805.00 B-17 Standard Drop Inlet 21 EA. 1 $1,554.10 $3,108.20 $2,650.00 $5,300.00 $2,015.10 $4,030.20 SUBTOTAL PART "B" (ITEMS B1 -B17) $88,472.50 $119,677.30 $119,801.06 Page 2 of 10 Page 3 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6167 & 6159) GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 HAAS -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, LTD P.O. Box 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 PART C -SANITARY SEWER BROOKDALE DRIVE C-1 8" PVC, 4'$' Cut 456 L.F. $44.00 $20,064.00 34.5 $15,732.00 $60.00 $27,360.00 C-2 8" PVC, 6'-6' Cut 336 L.F. $46.60 $15,657.60 $40.00 $13,440.00 $70.00 $23,520.00 C-3 8" PVC, 8'-10' ICut 395 L.F. $49.20 $19,434.00 $46.00 $18,170.00 $90.00 $35,550.00 C4 Manhole, 4'-6' Deep 2 EA. $2,719.60 $5,439.20 $2,875.00 $5,750.00 $2,425.24 $4,850.48 C-5 Manhole, 8'-10'Deep 3 EA. $3,237.70 $9,713.10 $3,900.00 $11,700.00 $2,959.94 $8,879.82 C-6 6" PVC Service, Near Side 24 EA. $518.00 $12,432.00 $400.00 $9,600.00 $1,000.00 $24,000.00 G7 6" PVC Service, Far Side 21 EA. $777.00 $16,317.00 $1,092.00 $22,932.00 $2,500.00 $52,500.00 C-8 Connect to Existing Service 11 EA. $647.50 $7,122.50 $287.00 $3,157.00 $454.15 $4,995.65 C-9 Trench Safety Plan 1,190 L.F. $2.60 $3,094.00 $3.00 $3,570.00 $3.22 $3,831.80 C-10 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $1,363.20 $1,363.20 $2,875.00 $2,875.00 $2,277.53 $2,277.53 C-11 Remove Existing Manhole Tops and Fill 3 EA. $1,036.10 $3,108.30 $920.00 $2,760.00 $609.85 $1,829.55 C-12 Grout Existing Wastewater Lines 1,270 L.F. $13.00 $16,510.00 $6.90 $8,763.00 $5.70 $7,239.00 CA3 Wastewater Utility Allowance 11 L.S. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART "C" (ITEMS C1 -C13) $140,254.90 $128,449.00 $206,833.83 Page 3 of 10 Page 4 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREETIMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 79362 HAAS -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, LTD P.O. Box 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 PART D - WATER BROOKDALE DRIVE D-1 6" PVC 1,273 L.F. $22.00 $28,006.00 $28.75 $36,598.75 $20.01 $25,472.73 D-2 8" PVC 282 L.F. $24.60 $6,937.20 $34.50 $9,729.00 $22.85 $6,443.70 D-3 Fire Hydrant Assemblies on 6" Une 2 EA. $2,978.60 $5,957.20 $2,930.00 $5,860.00 $2,854.18 $5,708.36 D-4 Fire Hydrant Assembly on 8" Line 1 EA. $2,978.60 $2,978.60 $3,420.00 $3,420.00 $3,043.82 $3,043.82 D5 6" Gate Valve and Box 4 E.A. $906.50 $3,626.00 $860.00 $3,440.00 $668.25 $2,673.00 D5 8" Gate Valve and Box 2 EA. $1,036.10 $2,072.20 $980.00 $1,960.00 $1,036.801 $2,073.60 D-7 6"x6"x8"x8' Cross 1 EA. $647.50 $647.50 $402.00 $402.00 $536.10 $536.10 D-8 8"x 6" Reducer1 EA. $291.40 $291.40 $287.00 $287.00 $199.13 $199.13 D-9 6"x 3" Reducer 1 EA. $259.00 $259.00 $172.00 $172.00 $189.57 $189.57 D-10 3" 450 Bend 1 EA. $259.00 $259.00 $58.00 $58.00 $224.47 $224.47 D-11 6" Blind Flange 1 EA. $129.50 $129.50 $172.00 $172.00 $119.32 $119.32 D-12 6" 90° Bend 2 EA $323.80 $647.60 $345.00 $690.00 $205.91 $411.82 D-13 1" Single Service, Near Side 21 EA. $453.30 $9,519.30 $402.00 $8,442.00 $300.001 $6,300.00 D-14 1" Single Service, Far Side 24 EA. $582.80 $13,987.20 $750.00 $18,000.00 $600.00 $14,400.00 D-15 1-1/2" Double Service 1 EA. $1,036.10 $1,036.10 $920.00 $920.00 $1,388.33 $1,388.33 D-16 Connect to Existing Services 26 EA. $453.30 $11,785.80 $115.00 $2,990.00 $350.00 $9,100.00 D-17 Trench Safety Plan 1,555 L.F. $2.60 $4,043.00 $2.30 $3,576.50 $1.81 $2,814.55- D-18 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $1,363.20 $1,363.20 $2,875.00 $2,875.00 $2,056.11 $2,056.11 D•19 Special Water Allowance 1 L.S. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 D-20 Connect to Existing Lines 3 EA. $1,295.10 $3,885.30 $1,380.00 $4,140.00 $717.50 $2,152.50 SUBTOTAL PART -D(ITEMS DI -D20) $107,431.10 $113,732.25 $95,307.11 Page 4 of 10 Page 5 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 HAAS -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, LTD P.O. Box 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 PART E -SIDEWALK AND DRIVES WHITING DRIVE E-1 4' Sidewalk and Turnouts 6,390 S.F. $3.10 $19,809.00 $3.40 $21,726.00 $2.75 $17,572.50 E-2 Concrete Driveway 2,775 S.F. $5.80 $16,095.00 $5.00 $13,875.00 $4.00 $11,100.00 E-3 Concrete Ramp Type 6 4 EA. $694.00 $2,776.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,633.57 $6,534.28 E-4 Remove Existing Drives and Walks 9,100 S.F. $0.80 $7,280.00 $1.50 $13,650.00 $1.91 $17,381.00 SUBTOTAL PARTE- (ITEMS E1 -E4) $45,960.00 $53,251.00 $52,587.78 TOTAL BASE BID (PARTS A, B, C, D, E) $617,998.20 $669,334.25 $700,199.06 Page 5 of 10 Page 6 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) W.T. YOUNG CONST. P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 SAUNAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3737 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PART A - STREET, SIDEWALK, DRIVES BROOKDALE DRIVE A-1 Street Excavation 4,330 S.Y. $7.20 $31,176.00 $35.88 $155,360.40 A-2 8" Compacted Su rade With Geogrid 4,330 S.Y. $4.50 $19,485.00 $4.74 $20,524.20 A-3 9"2% Lime Stabilized Caliche Base 4,330 S.Y. $10.30 $44,599.00 $13.37 $57,892.10 A-4 Prime Coat 520 GAL. $2.30 $1,196.00 $5.14 $2,672.80 A-5 2-11T HMAC Surface 3,464 S.Y. $8.70 $30,136.80 $9.25 $32,042.00 A-6 6" Curb and Gutter 2,474 L.F. $9.60 $23,750.40 $10.00 $24,740.00 A-7 4' Sidewalk and Turnouts 8,194 S.F. $3.60 $29,498.40 $4.53 $37,118.82 A-8 Concrete Drives 7,582 S.F. $5.30 $40,184.60 $6.17 $46,780.94 A-9 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $5,190.00 $5,190.00 $12,165.00 $12,165.00 A-10 Relocate Si ns & Mailboxes 1 L.S. $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $2,450.00 $2,450.00 A-11 Relocate Fence 240 L.F. $18.00 $4,320.00 $15.00 $3,600.00 A-12 Ozone Day 1 EA. $200.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 A-13 Type "A" Header Curb 361 L.F. $18.00 $6,498.00 $12.00 $4,332.00 A-14 Remove Existing Drives 3,015 S.F. $1.80 $5,427.00 $3.38 $10,190.70 A-15 Concrete Ramp Type 7 2 EA. $1,440.00 $2,880.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 A-16 Concrete Ramp, Type 3 2 FA. $1,140.00 $2,280.00 $1,300.00 $2,600.00 A-17 Remove and Replace Pavement at Gollihar Rd. 88 S.Y. $37.00 $3,256.00 $65.00 $5,720.00 SUBTOTAL PART "A -(ITEMS AI -A17) $255,477.20 $422,188.96 Page 6 of 10 Page 7 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) W.T. YOUNG CONST. P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 SAUNAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3737 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 PART B -STORM SEWER BROOKDALE DRIVE B-1 21" RCP 182 L.F. $45.60 $8,299.20 $47.88 $8,714.16 B-2 18" RCP 313 L.F. $35.00 $10,955.00 $45.70 $14,304.10 B-3 15" RCP 106 L.F. $31.50 $3,339.00 $47.15 $4,997.90 B4 Manhole Type "A" 3 EA. $2,280.00 $6,840.00 $4,740.00 $14,220.00 B-5 5'Curb Inlet 4 EA. $2,100.00 $8,400.00 $4,447.50 $17,790.00 B-6 Sidewalk Drains 10 EA. $250.00 $2,500.00 $150.00 $1,500.00 B-7 Topsoil and Grass Seeding 4,785 S.F. $1.60 $7,656.00 $0.35 $1,674.75 B-8 Topsoil and Grass Sodding 17,380 S.F. $1.80 $31,284.00 $0.75 $13,035.00 B-9 Remove Existing Inlets 2 EA. $480.00 $960.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 B-10 Trench Safety Plan 601 L.F. $1.00 $601.00 $1.00 $601.00 B-11 Pollution Prevention Plan 1 L.S. $1,320.00 $1,320.00 $6,250.00 $6,250.00 B-12 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $5,190.00 $5,190.00 $2,030.00 $2,030.00 B-13 Seal Ditch Openings at Existing Inlets 1 EA. $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 B-14 Remove Existing Manholes 4 EA. $1,320.00 $5,280.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 B-15 Remove and Replace Pavemt @ Sunn brook 95 S.Y. $38.00 $3,610.00 $65.00 $6,175.00 B-16 Remove Existing 18" RCP 1,100 L.F. $9.60 $10,560.00 $7.50 $8,250.00 B-17 Standard Drop Inlet 1 21 EA. 1 $2,220.00 $4,440.00 $3,856.251 $7,712.50 SUBTOTAL PART "B" (ITEMS B1-817) $112,434.20 $118,254.41 Page 7 of 10 Page 8 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) W.T. YOUNG CONST. P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Chrlsti, TX 78469 SAUNAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3737 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 PART C - SANITARY SEWER BROOKDALE DRIVE C-1 8" PVC, 4'-6' Cut 456 L.F. $24.50 $11,172.00 25.15 $11,468.40 C-2 8" PVC, 6'-8' Cut 336 L.F. $34.00 $11,424.00 $27.50 $9,240.00 C-3 8" PVC, V-10'ICut 395 L.F. $38.00 $15,010.00 $29.40 $11,613.00 C4 Manhole, 4'-6' Deep 2 EA. $2,050.00 $4,100.00 $2,862.50 $5,725.00 C-5 Manhole, 8'-10' Dee 3 EA $2,900.00 $8,700.00 $3,425.00 $10,275.00 C-6 6" PVC Service, Near Side 24 EA. $670.00 $16,080.00 $783.25 $18,798.00 C-7 6" PVC Service, Far Side 21 EA. $1,130.00 $23,730.00 $1,009.50 $21,199.50 C-8 Connect to Existing Service 11 EA. $400.00 $4,400.00 $716.90 $7,885.90 C-9 Trench Safety Plan 1,190 L.F. $2.001 $2,380.00 $1.50 $1,785.00 C-10 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $5,190.00 $5,190.00 $2,030.00 $2,030.00 C-11 Remove Existing Manhole Tops and Fill 3 EA. $840.00 $2,520.00 $2,462.50 $7,387.50 C-12 Grout Existing Wastewater Lines 1,270 L.F. $9.60 $12,192.00 $4.45 $5,651.50 G13 Wastewater Utility Allowance 1 L.S. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART "C" (ITEMS C1 -C13) $126,898.00 $123,058.80 Page 8 of 10 Page 9 of 10 BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 & 6159) W.T. YOUNG CONST. P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3737 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 PART D - WATER BROOKDALE DRIVE D-1 6" PVC 1,273 L.F. $21.00 $26,733.00 $25.25 $32,143.25 D-2 8" PVC 282 L.F. $24.00 $6,768.00 $31.30 $8,826.60 D-3 Fire Hydrant Assemblies on 6" Line 2 EA. $3,060.00 $6,120.00 $3,150.00 $6,300.00 D4 Fire Hydrant Assembly on 8" Line 1 FA. $3,162.00 $3,162.00 $3,787.50 $3,787.50 D-5 6" Gate Valve and Box 4 EA. $800.00 $3,200.00 $1,040.00 $4,160.00 D-6 8" Gate Valve and Box 2 EA. $1,080.00 $2,160.00 $1,350.00 $2,700.00 D-7 6"x6"x8"x8" Cross 1 FA. $570.00 $570.00 $412.50 $412.50 D-8 8" x 6" Reducer 1 EA. $160.00 $160.00 $212.50 $212.50 D-9 6"x 3" Reducer 1 FA. $150.00 $150.00 $200.00 $200.00 D-10 13"45- Bend 1 EA. $270.00 $270.00 $237.50 $237.50 D-11 6" Blind Flange 1 EA. $60.00 $60.00 $162.50 $162.50 D-12 6" 900 Bend 2 EA $730.00 $1,460.00 $268.75 $537.50 D-13 1" Single Service, Near Side 21 EA. $920.00 $19,320.00 $884.40 $18,572.40 D-14 1' Single Service, Far Side 24 EA. $1,090.00 $26,160.00 $1,098.75 $26,370.00 D-15 1-1/2" Double Service 1 EA. $1,530.00 $1,530.00 $1,862.50 $1,862.50 D-16 Connect to Existing Services 26 EA. $300.00 $7,800.00 $282.50 $7,345.00 D-17 Trench Safety Plan 1,555 L.F. $1.00 $1,555.00 $1.40 $2,177.00 D-18 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $5,190.00 $5,190.00 $2,030.00 $2,030.00 D-19 Special Water Allowance 1 L.S. $10,000.00 $101000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 D-20 lConnect to Existing Lines 3 EA. $1,560.00 $4,680.00 $1,206.25 $3,618.75 SUBTOTAL PART "D" (ITEMS Df -D20) $127,048.00 $131,655.50 Page 9 of 10 Page 10 of 10 'Multiplication Error on Item No. D-17 (Contractors Number $877,977.12) BROOKDALE DRIVE AND WHITING DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. (6157 S 6159) W.T. YOUNG CONST. P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3737 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 PART E - SIDEWALK AND DRIVES WHITING DRIVE E-1 4' Sidewalk and Turnouts 6,390 S.F. $5.40 $34,506.00 $4.53 $28,946.70 E-2 Concrete Ddveway 2,775 S.F. $7.60 $21,090.00 $6.17 $17,121.75 E-3 Concrete Ramp Type 6 4 EA. $3,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 E4 Remove Existing Drives and Walks 9,100 S.F. $2.40 $21,840.00 $3.38 $30,758.00 SUBTOTAL PART -E- (ITEMS E1 -E4) $89,436.00 $82,826.15 TOTAL BASE BID (PARTS A, 8, C, D, El $711,293.40 $877,984.12 Page 10 of 10 'Multiplication Error on Item No. D-17 (Contractors Number $877,977.12) N WHITING SIDEWALK IMPROVE. CHURCHILL TO VICINITY f/IAP NOT TO SCALE CITY PROJECT NO. 6157, 6159 BROOKDALE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM GOLLIHAR TO SUNNYBROOKRO (6157) Vi~I'IITING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FROM CHURCHILL TO LANIERDR (6159) EXHIBIT "D' CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: I ol~ 1 DATE: 10-11-2002 ORDINANCE CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FOLLOWING HIGHWAY IN CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS: Brookdale Street improvements from Gollihar to Sunnybrook and Whiting Street sidewalk improvements from Churchill to Lanier IMPOSING ASSESSMENTS TOTALING $77,685.74 AGAINST PROPERTY ABUTTING THE IMPROVEMENTS, AFFECTED RAILWAYS, AND PROPERTY AND RAILWAY OWNERS; FIXING CORRESPONDING LIENS ON PROPERTY AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS AND THE CORRESPONDING LIENS AND CHARGES BASED ON AS-BUILT CONDITIONS; SPECIFYING ASSESSMENT PAYMENT TERMS AND LIEN ENFORCEMENT MEASURES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. In its Resolution No.024995, passed on September 9, 2002, the city council determined that it was necessary to improve and ordered the improvement of the following highway in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: Brookdale Street improvements from Gollihar to Sunnybrook and Whiting Drive sidewalk improvements from Churchill to Lanier (collectively, the "Brookdale/Whiting Street Improvements/Sidewalk Project") (the "Project"). In that resolution, the city council also noted that street, curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements were to be paid for partly by the city and partly by assessments. Driveway improvements were to be paid for entirely by assessments. On November 26, 1996, the city council passed Resolution No. 022767, which specified roles which apply to the city street improvement assessment process (the "Assessment Process Rules Resolution"). These rules concerned assessment hearing notice and the assessmem heating itself. In Resolution No. 024996 passed on September 9, 2002, the city council scheduled a public hearing on proposed assessments for the Brookdale/Whiting Street Improvements/Sidewalk Project. The city council directed that heating notice be published and mailed in accordance with the Assessment Process Rules Resolution. Thereafter, notice was published on the following dates: September 23, 2002, September 30, 2002, and October 7, 2002. Written notice was sent via certified mail to owners of property abutting the proposed improvements, and owners of affected railways, if any, on October 3, 2002. H:~LEG-DIR\john\ORI)INANCEXCIose Pub. Hrg. Brookdale Whiting.wpd ] NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. During the September 9, 2002 city council meeting, a public hearing was held concerning proposed assessments for the Brookdale/Whiting Street Improvements/Sidewalk Project. The city council considered: Ao written testimony by the city's director of engineering services and a city-retained real estate appraiser. A copy of the appraiser's written testimony is attached as Exhibit A; testimony, if any, by owners of property abutting the proposed improvements and their representatives; C. testimony, if any, by owners of affected railways and their representatives; additional testimony, if any, by the director of engineering services, other members of city staff, and a city-retained real estate appraiser; and E. other testimony and evidence, if any. After consideration of all testimony and other evidence, the assessment hearing is closed. SECTION 2. Proposed assessments for each property abutting proposed improvements and for affected railway property, if any, are listed in Exhibit B. These assessments have been calculated according to the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi (the "Corpus Christi Code") Section 49-2 1 and Texas Transportation Code Chapter 313. The front-foot rule was applied unless that would have resulted in injustice or inequality. In those cases, however, the city council has applied special rates or made other equitable adjustments to the assessments, all considering the: special benefit the property and the owner receive in enhanced value to the property; B. equities of the owners; and adjustment of the apportionment to produce a substantial equality of benefits received and burdens imposed. SECTION 3. The city council determines that the assessment on each property listed in Exhibit B is just and equitable and does not exceed the special benefit in enhanced value which that property and its owner will receive by construction of the proposed improvements. H:~LEG-DIR\john\ORDINANCE\CIose Pub. Hrg. Brookdal¢ Whiting.wpd 2 SECTION 4. The assessments listed in Exhibit B are adopted and fixed as a lien on the property and a personal liability and charge against the property owner. This includes any property which is in the area between, under, or extending two feet outside a railway's tracks, double tracks, mm outs, or switches. SECTION 5. The director of engineering services or his designee is authorized to adjust these assessments and the corresponding liens and charges without further city council action if it is determined after completion of the proposed improvements that the amount of property actually improved is either greater or less than the amount utilized for purposes of calculating the assessment. Under those circumstances, an adjustment may be made to ensure that the assessment for each property corresponds to as-built conditions. The adjustment will be made using the same assessment method (front-foot role, special rate, other equitable adjustment) which was used to calculate the assessment listed in Exhibit B. It is intended that these adjustments will not be substantial in nature. Thus, they will not trigger any statutory requirement for the city council to hold a new assessment hearing to impose revised assessments. SECTION 6. These assessments have been imposed after due consideration of all testimony and other evidence. They include any appropriate equitable adjustments. They also reflect the correction of any errors, inaccuracies, or irregularities noted at the public hearing. All protests against or objections to the assessments or to the contract for the improvements, other than as reflected in Exhibit B, are denied. SECTION 7. In accordance with Corpus Christi Code Section 49-21, a property owner may pay an assessment as follows: Any property owner against whom and against whose property an assessment has been imposed may pay the whole assessment, without interest, within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance of the improvements by the city. Alternatively, an assessment may be paid in 120 or fewer monthly installments. The first installment will be payable within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance of the improvements by the city. Installments and accrued interest will be due each month thereafter until the assessment is paid. Alternatively, an assessment may be paid in 10 or fewer annual installments. The first installment will be payable within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance of the improvements by the city. One installment and accrued interest will be due each year thereafter until the assessment is paid. SECTION 8. The interest rate on assessments will be the greater of: A. eight (8) percent per annum; or H:~LEG-DIR\john\ORDINANCI~Clos¢ Pub. Hxg. Brookdal¢ Whiting.wpd 3 B. the interest rate paid by the city on its most recently issued general obligation bonds. Assessment installments may be paid at any time before maturity by paying the principal and accrued interest. If a property owner does not timely pay an assessment indebtedness or any part thereof, then the whole indebtedness remaining unpaid will, at the option of the city, immediately mature and become payable without notice, demand, or presentment for payment. SECTION 9. These assessment liens are first and prior liens on the property affected. They are superior to any other lien or claim other than one for county, school district, or municipal ad valorem taxes. The liens date from September 9, 2002, the date when the Corpus Christi City Council ordered the Brookdale/Whiting Street Improvements/Sidewalk Project. SECTION 10. A lien against property or the personal liability of a property owner that arises from an assessment under this ordinance may be enforced by suit or sale of the property assessed in the manner provided by law for sale of property for municipal ad valorem taxes. Further, the assessments may be collected along with interest, expenses of collection, and reasonable attorneys' fees. SECTION 11. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, to find and declare an emergency because of the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of city affairs, such finding of an emergency is made and declared requiring suspension of the charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ., 2002. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM THE I~- DAY OF ~, 2002 JAMES R. BRAY JR., CITY ATTORNEY By: Q~hn p. Burl~e:Jr. ~ Assistant City Attorney HALEG-DIR\john\ORDINANCffXCIose Pub. Hrg. Brookdal¢ Whiting.wpd 4 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Henry Garrett Rex A. Kirmison Bill Kelly John Longoria Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:~LEG-DIR\john\ORD1NANCE\Close Pub. Hrg. Brookdale Whiting.wpd 5 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT BROOKDALE DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM GOLLIHAR ROAD TO SUNNYBROOK WHITING SIDEWALK IIMPROVEMENTS FROM CHURCHILL TO LANIER My name is Angel R. Escobar. I am the City Engineer for the City of Corpus Christi and have served in this capacity for the last 26 months and as Assistant City Engineer for the last one hundred twenty ___mo_n.~_s(120) m0r~ths. I am a Professional Engineer, licensed by the State of Texas since 1977. I have over 24 years of experience in design of construction and estimating the costs thereof. I am familiar with this project, which encompasses: · Brookdale Drive from Gollihar Road to Sunnybrook · Whiting from Churchill to Lanier This project consists of construction of 1,250 linear feet of 28-foot back-to-back pavement, sidewalks, driveways, 560 linear feet of storm sewer, 1,190 linear feet of sanitary sewer and 1,560 linear feet of water line together with all appurtenances as shown on the plans and called for in the specifications. Limits of the work will be as follows: · Brookdale Drive from Gollihar Road to Sunnybrook · Whiting from Churchill to Lanier Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Utilities Commercial Paper Program. Prior to this hearing, I had an estimate of project costs prepared, and it compared favorably with the bids received. In my opinion, the costs are true and accurate. This project is estimated to start in December 2002 with completion in May 2003. Angel R. Escobar, P.E. (Date) Director of Engineering Services EXHIBIT "A" GEORGE' N CORPUS CHRISTI, TSXAS 78411 Ausust 20, 2002 PARASKEVAS REALTORS PREMLIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- BROOKDALE DRIVE & WHITING DRIVE B~ookdale Drive- Oollibar Road to Sunnybrook Road Whiting Drive - Churchill Drive to Lanier Drive My name ia George N Paraskeva$ and I am a State Certified Residential appraiser and have been evaluating property and practicing real estate in the Corpus Christi area since 1971. I have expcriance in appraising both commercial and residential properties, and I am familiar with the real estate market in Corpus Christi. I am familiar with the Brookdale Street Improvements and Whiting Sidewalk lmprovamants. I agree with Mr. JeffBarroso's description of the conditions to be changed and I am familiar with the improv~onts to be made by the City of Corpus Christi. I have reviewed the project assessmeat roll; and personally examined each of thc 78 parcels of land thexein. In my opinion each such parcel will be specifically benefited by each improvement to be aase~xl against it; without regard to the community benefit. In addition, it is my opinion that each such parcel will be specially enhanced by such improvement at least to the extent of the asseasmeat stated. George N Paraskevas Appr~ber OFF'ICl; ($61) 992-2~4! PAX (36l) 992-~'S4.2 geopara@ccbor, org www. georgeparaskevas.cem Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Brookdale Dr. - Gollihar Rd. to Sunnybrook Rd, Whiting Dr. - Churchill Dr. to Lanier Dr. Revised August 22, 2002 EXHIBIT "B" bitigeNom<sdd. Agaf scant AarnemMt 'Assetoo at A4aa441isent ` Total Item. roc Daerlg: Qqsstily lute Amognt Amount. Begin Brookdale Dr. - West Side Frmn Gollihar Rd. to Sunnybrook Rd. 01 Taxes Association ofChrusion Churches 18.5 ft. Club, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 pa fl. = SI80.3 109 S, University Dr. 0.0 fl. Curb, Gutta, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. = 50.0 Ft. Worth, TX 76109 160. R' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front CC $1.00 per ft.' _ $160. 621 Gollihar Rd. 0A ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side C $0.50 pa ft.' _ $0.0 Lot 1, Block I 0. ft.' No Driveway CC, $5.18 per ft' _ $0.0 Brenda" 0. ft? No Second Driveway C $5.18= pa ft f0. 1050-0001-0010 OAK fl? No Extras C4 $0.00 per ft.'? = S0. -IB 0.0 ft' No Extras C4 $0.00 per R' = $0.0( 5340.38 OS Teras Association oJChrirtian Chruches 50.0 fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front 19.75 pa fl. _ 1487.5 109 S. University Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 pa ft. _ $0. Worth, TX 76109 200. ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 pati _ $200. 821 Gollihar Rd. 0. R' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side I0.50 per ft' = S0. At 2, Block 1 0. R' No Driveway 15.18 Pa ft' _ $0, m1dawn 0. R.' No Second Driveway 55.18 pa ft' _ $0. 1050-0001-0010 B fl.' No Extras $O. W pa R.' _ $0. -IB 0. fl.' No Extras 50.00 per ft' = $0. $687.50 03 luebonnerAreo of the Christian Church 50.0 ft. Curb, Gutta, and Pavement - Front $9.75 pa ft. _ $487.5 '18 N them 0, ft. Curb, Gutta, and Pavement - Side Ca $4.88 MO. = 50.0 Antonio, TX -8205 106. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ca $1.00 per R' = $106.0 rookdale Dr. 0. ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 per ft.' = S0. Lot 3, Block 1 250. ft' 20 fl. Wide Driveway ca $5.18 per ft? $1,295. rookown 00 R' No Second Driveway Ca $5.18 per ft.' _ $0. 105041101-0030 0. ft' No Extras Ca $0 00 per fl.' = $0.0 -IB 0. fl.' No Extras ca $0.00 perft? _ Mot $1,888.50 04 /uebonnet Area of the Christian Church 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 pa ft. _ $487.5 'l8 N Main 0 0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side- $4.88 per fl. $0. an Antonio, TX "8105 ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per R.' _ - am rookdale Dr. 0.0 V 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side C4 §0.50 pa ft.' = S0. of 4, Block 1 173.0 ft? 13 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $896.1 r I.r n 0A ft' No Second Driveway Ca $5.18 per ft.' = 50.0 1050-0001-0030 0.0 ft.' No Extras ca 50.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 -l6 0. R' No Extras C $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 $1.521.641 05 Joel A. Balboa 50.0 ft. Curb, Gutta, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. _ $487.5 51' Brookdale Dr. 0.0 ft. Curb, Gutta, and Pavement - Side C, $4.88 per ft. _ $0. orpus Christi, TX -8415 = fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 pa fl.' _ $158. 517 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl? 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side- §0.50 pa ft.' - $0.0 Lot 5, Block 1 140.0 R.' 10 fl. Wide Driveway $5.18 pa ft.' _ $725.2 rooklawn 0.0 ft' No Second Driveway $5.18 pa ft.' _ $0.0 1050-0001-0050 0A R' No Extras C, $0.00 per ft.' _ $0. -1B 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per R' = S0. $1 .370.70 06 'MA Balboa 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - From r $9.75 per ft. _ro $487.5 SI'Bokdale Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side §4,88 pa R. - - §0.0 arpus Christi, TX -8415 160. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front ca $1.00 pa fl? _ $160.0 517 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 ft.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side ca $0.50 Per fl? _ $0.0 of 6, Block 1 140.0 ft' 10 ft, Wide Driveway Ca $5.18 per ft' = $725.2 rookown 0.0 ft' No Second Driveway Ca $5.18 per ft' = I0. 1050-0001-0060 0.0 ft' No Extras Ca $0.00 per ft.' _ $0. -1B 0.0 ft.' No Extras Ca $0.00 per ft' _ $0. $1372.70 07 rnsmo Bayes, et ter 50.0 ft. Curb, Goner, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. _ $487.5 118 Bloomington 0.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side @ $4.88 per ft. _ $0.0 i orpus Christ , TX'8416 140.0 ft? 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk -Front @ $1.00 pa B? = $140.0 525 Brookdale Dr. 0. B? 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side @ $0.50 per R' _ $0.0 Lot 7, Block 1 195.0 B? 15 ft. Wide Driveway @ $5.18 per fl.' = $1,010.1( rooklawn 0.0 ft.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl.' _ $0.0 1050-0001-0070 0A ft? No Extras $0.00 Per ft.' _ $0. -IB 0.0 ft.' No Extras 50.00 per fl? = 0. 163760 $1637 60 EXHIBIT "B" Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised Au ust 22 2002 Page 2 OWIM"'Nkmeand o Ancone t A4re{tm4at AMMMeat Assessment TOSaI Pto Deacri on. aoR Deaeri dw Rate Amount Amoaut. ocher Properties 50 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front 59.75 per fl. = 5487.5 I o Rick and Gloria Camareno 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side 54.68 per fl. _ $0 O. Box 31111/ 160. fl.' 4fl. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00R.'S160ext Brounfels, TX 78131 0.0 ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per ft' _ $0.29 Brookdale Dr. 140, ft.' 10 fl. Wide Driveway $5.18 per It! _ $725.2 of 8, Block 1 0. ft.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' = S0 "Idawn 0. fl.' No Extras j0.00 per ft' - - S0. 1050-0001-0080 0. fl.' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $0. -IB 09 elan B. Gonzalez 50. R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9.75 per fl. � $487.5 SI 372.70 533 Broakdafe Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. _ $0,0 orpas Christi, TX `8415 160. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R.' = $160.0 533 Brookdale Dr. 0, ft.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per V _ $0. of 9, Block 1 140. R.' 10 ft, Wide Driveway $5,18 pm R? _ $725.2 rooklawn 0. ft' No Sewnd Driveway $5.18 per R.' = S0. 1050-0001-0090 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $O.ft -1B 0.0 ft.' No Extras $0.00 per It! = S0.0 SI 72.70 10 Enrique Perez 50.0 a. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front 59.75 per R. _ $487.5 53-Brookdole Dr 0. fl. Curb, Gutte , and Pavement - Side 54.88 per R. _ $0. Corpus Christi, TX -8415 160. R.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front 51.00 per ft.' = $160. 537 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 pm R.' no _ $0. Lot 10, Block 1 128. fl.' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.16 per - - $663.0 rooklawn 0. R.' No Second Driveway 55.18 per R.' B SO.R 1050-0001-0100 0. ft.' No Extras 50.0 •1B 0.0 ft.' No Extras 50.00 per R.' _ $0. $1,310. 11 tmmn C AN res, et ux 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9J5 per R. _ $487.5 54/ Brookdale De 0. R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Sid< $4.88 per R $0.0 orpus Christi, 7X -8415 160. R? 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft.' _ $160.0 341 Broakdek Dr. 0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per R.' _ SOV Let 11, Block 1 140. ft.' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $725.2 rooklawn 0. fl.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $0. 1050.0001-0110 00 ft' No Extras 50.00 per, R? - - $0.01 -IB 0.0 R° No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 $1.372.701 12 aul R. Quintmidla 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. _ $487.5 545 Breokdole Dr. 0. ft. Cmb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. - $0.0 Corpus Christi, TX -8415 144. ft' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft? _ $144. 545 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft' S0 of 12, Block 1 184.0 fl.' 14 R. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $953.1 rooklawn 0. ft? No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' = $0.0 1050-0001-0120 0 ft? No Extras $0.00 pm It! = SOA -/B 0.0 R' No Extras 50.00 per ft' _ $0.0 $I 584.62 13 bel Sanchez, el ur 50.0 fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per fl. _ $487.5 60/ Brookdafe Dr. 0.0 fl. Curb, Cutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. = 500 orprts Christi, 7X "8415 152. fl? 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R.' _ $152. 01 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' = $0.0 At 13, Block 1 162, fl.' 12 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $839.1 rooklawn 0. R' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' - $0. 1050.0001-0130 0. ft.' No Extras � ft r - $0. -1B 0.0 ft.' No Extras 50.00 per R.' _ - 0. $1 .478.661 14 esus B. and Maria D. Sanchez 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9.75 per R. = $487.5 605 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl. Curb, Cutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0.0 orpus Christi, TX -8415 124.0 ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft.' _ $124. 5 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' _ $0. of 14, Block 1 239.0 R.' 19 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $1,238.0 roaklawn 0.0 fl.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R' _ $0.0 1050.0001-0140 0 ft.' No Extras - $0.0 -10 0. R.r No Extras 5000 per R.' _ 15 Ijredo Medina 50.0 fl. Curb, Gutttt, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. _ $487 5 $1 ,849.52 609 Bruokdole Dr. 0.0 fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. - $0. Corpus Christi, TX -8415 148.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1-00 perft' _ $148. 9 Brwkdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per ft' = S0. Lot 15, Block 1 167. ft.' 13 fl. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft' _ $865.0 rooklawn 0. ft' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl.' = $0.0( 1050-0001"0150 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per ft' _ $0.0 -IB 0,0( fl.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 S1 500.56 Page 2 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised Au ust 22 2002 Page 3 Op71er N(Iso #ad..., Aawsmeut Atonement Assi anent Assessment Total Item Pro Dactd tion na fily Destitution Rate Amount. Amount 16 endo de Leon mldNelda Perez 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - From $9.75 per fl. = $487.5 annummunt 613 Brookdale De 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0, .rpm Christi, TX -8JI5 156. R' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per fl.' _ $156. 13 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per R' _ $0.0 of 16, Block 1 145. ft.' I 1 ft. Wide Driveway t $5.18 per ft' _ $751.1 rooklawn 0. fl' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl.' _ $0. 1050-0001-0160 0.0 fl.' No Extras 50.00 per fl.' _ $0. -IB 0. fl' No Extras 5000 per fl.' _ $0.0 $I 94.60 17 obeno Smith Castro, of m65,0( ft. Curb, Gruner, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per fl. _ $633.7 61- Brookdale Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gun", and Pavement - Side $4.88= Per ft. $0.0 orpus Chrirli, TX T8475 196. A' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per ft.' = $196.0 17 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per R' _ $0. At 17, Block 1 206. A' 16 fl. Wide Driveway $5.18 per fl.' _ $1,067.0 rooklawn 0.0 fl.' No Second Driveway C, $5.18 per fl.' _ $0. 1050.0001-0170 00 ft' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 -IB 0. fl' No Extras $0.00 per ft' _ $0. $1 996.83 18 K.F. Clhon, et ux 50.0 fl. ur Cb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9.75 per fl. = 5487.5 621 Brookdale Dc 0.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side Ca 54.88 per fl. _ $0.0 Corpus Christi, 7X -8415 200. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ca $1.00 per fl.' _ $200.0 21 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 per ft.' _ $0. Lot 18, Bloek 1 0. fl.' No Driveway ca $5.18 per ft.' _ $0. rooklawn 0. ft.' No Second Driveway ca $5.18 per ft.' _ $0. 1050 -MI -0180 0. ft.2 No Extras ca $0.00 per R' _ $0. -IB 0. ft.' No Extras ca $0.00 per R' _ $0. $687.50 19 K.F Ghon, et ux 25.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front C $9.75 per ft. _ $243.75 621 Brookdale Dr 0.0 fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side C $4.88 per fl. _ $0. orpm Christi, 7X -8415 0. fl' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front Cry $1.00 per ft' _ $0. 21 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 perfl' _ $0. E2 Lot 19, Black 1 305,0( ft2 25 fl. Wide Driveway C $5.18 per R' _ $1,579.9 rooklawn 0,0( R' No Second Driveway a $5.18 per R' = S0.0 1050-0001-0180 a0c R' No Extras ca $0.00 per R' = SB.B -IB 0. R' No Extras ca $0.00 Per ft' _ $0.0 -$1.823.65 20 Zamm Hinojosa 25. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front @ 59.75 per fl. _ $243.7 629 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0.0 orpm Christi, 7X '8415 100. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front C $1.00 per fl.' _ $100.0 29 Brookdale Dr. 0. fC 4 B. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per fl' = SOA W2 Lot 19, Block 1 0. fl.' No Driveway S5.18 per R' _ $0.0 rr=B 0. ft' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl' = S0.0 1050.0001-0190 0.0 fl.' No Extras ca $0.00 per ft' _ $0.0 -1B 0. fl' No Extras ca $0.00 per R' $0.0c 5343.75 21 imum Hinojosa 50R( ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front C $9.75 per ft. _ $487.5( 629 Brookdale Dr. 0 0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side C $4.88 per ft. _ Wilt orpus Christi, TX "8415 1560 R' Oft. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ci $1.00 per fl.' _ $156.00 629 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ci $0.50 per fl.' _ $0.00 At 20, Block 1 151.0 ft.' 11 ft. Wide Driveway C 55.18 per its $782.18 rooklawn 0.0 R' No Second Driveway S5.18 Per Its _ $0.0 1050.0001-0200 00 ft'No Extras r $0.00 Per fl' _ $0.0 -1 B O.N ft' No Exrms $0.00 per ft.' = 0. $1 ,425.68 22 sme(S. Ouinranilla 50.0f R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front C $9.75 MR. _ $487.50 633 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side , $4.88 per ft. _ $0.00 orpm Christi, 7X -8415 140. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front C $1.00 per ft.' _ $140.00 633 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side C $0.50 per R' _ $0.00 of 21, Block 1 195. ft.' 15 fl. Wide Driveway @ $5.18 per It.' _ $1,010.10 rooklawn 0.0 ft.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft' _ $0. 1050.0001-0210 00 fl' No Extras $000 per ft' _ $0.0 -18 0,0 ft' No Extras $0.00 per fl.' _ $0.0 S1,637.60 $L627.60 Page 3 22 2002 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. On Revised August Owaer Naale and A4aMommt Automatot'. Aaltpment Atr"Wist Total.. Item.. Pro gmcri lion sa i Descriptions Rah Amount Amount 24 mania G. andAvrom Garcia 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front 19.75 Per fl. = $487.5 641 Brookdsle Dr. 0. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.68 per ft. _ $0. arpus Chried, TX "8415 140. ft.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per It! $140. 41 Brookdale Dr. 0. R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk- Side $0.50 per R.' _ $00 of 23, Black 1 R.' 15 fl. of 25 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per fl.' _ rooklawn 0. R.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $p, 1050.0001-0230 0.0 flS No Extras $0.00 per = 70.0 -IB 0. R' No Extras $0.00 Pm fl.' _ $0. 23 Antonio G. and Aurora Garcia 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavemrnt-Front 59.75 per fl. _ §487.5 $I 559.90 4 641 Brookdale De -8415 0. fl. Curb, Crutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. - $0.0 orpus Christi, TX 96. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front 51.00 per R.' = $96.0 1 Brookdsle Dr. 0. fl.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk -Side $0.50 per R' = $0. Lot 24, Block 1 125. ft' 10 R. of 25 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per fl! = S647.5 rooklawn 206. R.' 16 fl. Wide Driveway $5.18 per fl.' _ $1,067.0 1050.0001-0230 0. R.' No Extras 50.00 per ft.' - - $0.0 -IB 0. R.' No Extras $0.00 per R.' = 0. 26 lfredL. Silva 50. ft. Curb, Goner, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. - - $487.5 $2 298.08 313 Moroviun Or 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Side $4,88 per R. - $0. orpus Christi, TX -8415 200. If! 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - From $1.00 per R.' _ $200. 9 Brookdsle Dr. 0. RP 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' - S0. Lot 25, Block 1 0. fl.' No Driveway $5.18 pm it' = SOA rooklawn 0. ft.' No Second Driveway $5.18 paw _ $0. 1050.0001-0250 0. R' No Exams $0.00 Per R.' _ $0. -16 0.0 fl.' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $0. $07.50 Smaybrook Rd. Intersection End Brookdale M. - West Side Begin Brookdale Dr. - Easa Side From Sunnybrock Rd. m Gollibm Rd. 27 omero Sema 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per R. = S487. 4 650 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. = SO.0 Corpus Christi, TX -8415 200.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - From $L00 per fl.' - 5200.0 50 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per fl.' _ $0. Lot 25, Block 2 0.0 R' No Driveway $5.18 pm ft.' _ $0. rooklawn 0. fl.' No Second Driveway- $5.18 per fl.' - $0.0 1030.0002-0250 0. R.' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $0.0 -1B 0. fl.' No Extras $0.00 per R.' = $0.0 28 ablo Gonzalez, et ux 50.0 R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavemrnt - Frons $9.75 per ft. = 5487.5 $687.50 646 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavemrna -Side $4.88 per ft. $0.0 orpus Christi, 7X'8415 136. R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 Per R.' _ $136.0 b Brookdale Dr. 0, ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per fl.' _ §0. Lot 24, Block 2 206, it' 16 it. Wide Driveway $5.18 per R.' = $1,067.0 rooklawn B ft.' No Second Driveway 55.16 Per ft.' _ $0.0 1050.0002-0240 0. V No Extras $0.00 per ft' _ $0.0 -18 0.0 fl.' No Extras $0.00 per R' _ $0.0 29 rsncisco Guerra 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. = $487 5 TI 690.58 642 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side 54.88 per fl. _ $0. orpus Christi, 7X-8415 116. it' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 Per it' = $164.0 2 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 Per R' = $0.0 At 23, Block 2 261. R' 21 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 Per R' _ $1,351.9 rooklawn 0.0 fl.' No Second Driveway, $5.18 per R.' = S0, 1050-0002-0240 0.0 No Extras $0.00 per R.' = S0. -1B 0. No Extras $0.00 Per fl.' _ $0. 30 scarNvnez, et ux 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front 59.75 per ft. = S487.5 $2 003.48 838 Broughton Dr 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side 8 $4.88 per ft. _ $0.01 Corpus Christi, TX -8415 149.0 R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1 per fl.' = $149.0 634 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 R.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk -Side $0.50 Per ft = 50.0 Lot 22, Block 2 151.0 R.' I l ft. Wide Driveway 55.18 Per ft' = 5762.1 rooklawn 0. R.' No Second Driveway $5.16 per fl.' 1030.0002-0210 0. R' No Extras $0.00 Pm ft' 'IB 0. ft.' No Extras $0.00 Per R.' 1418.68 Page 4 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised Au est 22 2002 Page 5 5;WrName*ad Anointment - Assessment Assessment Alnoonumt Total Item P:' Decd Hoo. n ti Duan Rate Amount Amount 31 scar Nunez, et ur 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front S9.75 Der ft. $487.5 838 Broughton Dr 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per R. _ $0. orpus Christi, TX "8415 148. ft.' Oft. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per fl' = $146. 14 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft? 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per fl' _ $0. At 21, Black 2 140.0 R.' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 Per ft.' = S725.2 rooklawn 0. fl' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl' _ $0. 1050-0002-0210 0. fl' No Extras $0.00 per ft! = S0. -IB 00 fl' No Extras 5000 per R? _ $0.0 Tl 360.70 32 rene M Guerra 50. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per R. _ $487.5 Vo Guadalupe J Guerra 0. R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. _ $0.0 626 Brookdale 131. R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 Per fl' = S131. orpur, Christi, TX "8415 0. fl.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft' _ $0. rooulale Dr. 162, ft' 12 R. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft' _ $839.1 At 20, Black 2 0. ft' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' = S0. rooWawn 0,0 R? No Extras $0.00 per ft' = SO.0 1050-0002-0200 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $0. -IB $1.457.661 33 rene M. Guerra 50. ft. Curb, Gun", and Pavement- Front $9.75 ptt ft = S487.5 a Guadalupe J. Guerra 0. ft. Curb, Goner, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft _ $dA 4 616 Brookdale Dr. 152. ft! 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per fl' _ $152.0 Corpus Christi, TX -8415 0. fl.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per ft' = S0. 26 Brookdale Dr. 162. R' 12 R. Wide Driveway $5.18 Per R' _ $839.1 Lot 19, Block 2 0. ft! No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $0. rooklawn 0. R? No Extras $0.00 per ft' _ $0. 1050-0002-0190 0. fl' No Extras 50.00 per ft' = 0. IB $1 478.66 34 arced Pena, el ur 65.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. = S633.95 4 622 Brookdale Dr, 0. R. Curb, Cmtter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0.0 Corpus Christi, 7X "8415 200. fl' 4 A. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per fl.' = S200. 22 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per R.' _ $0. Lot 18-A, Block 2 147. R.' 12 ft. out of 20 ft. Wide Shared Driveway $5.18 per ft' _ $761.4 rooklawn 0. ft? No Second Driveway $5.18 per R' _ $0. 1050.0002-0185 0. R.' No Extras $0.00 per R.' 50.0 -IB 0. ft? No Extras 50.00 perfl? SOA Tl 595.21 35 Ralph G. Shepord, /! and Lisa M Shepord 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. = S487.5 .O Boz 721103 OV ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. _ $O. orpus Christi, TX "84'1 158. ft' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft.' _ $158. 618 Brookdale Dr. 0 0 fl' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' _ $0. Lot 17-A, Block 2 103.0 fl' 8 fl. out of 20 ft. Wide Shared Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $533.5 rooklawn 0,0( fl' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $0.0 1050-11002-0170 0.0 R? No Extras Per ft' - $0.0 -IB 0. ft.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 $1 179.04 36 odoljo Medina, el ux 50. ft. Cab, Gutter, and Pavement -Front E9.75 per ft. = $487.5 614 Brookdale Dr 0. ft. Curb, Guam, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per R. _ $0. orpus Christi, TX -8415 200. R? 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft! _ $200.0 14 Brookdale Dr. 00 fl' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft' = SO.0 Lot 16, Block 2 0.0 fl' No Driveway $5.18 per ft? $0.0 rooklawn 0. ft' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $0.0 1050-0002-0150 0 0 fl' No Extras 50.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 -1B 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 Per fC = SO.0 $687.50 37 ado(ja Medina, at ur 50. R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9.75 per ft. _ $487.5 614 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft. Curb, Guner, and Pavement - Side 54.88 per fl. _ $0. oryus Chrlsli, TX '8415 160. ft' 4 0. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per V _ $160.0 14 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft? 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' _ $0.0 of 15, Block 2 140. R' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft' = $725.2 rooklawn 0 0 fl.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl.' _ $0.0 1050-0002-0150 0.0 ft.' No Extras $0.00 per R' _ $0.0 -1B 0.0 fl' No Extras WOO per ft.' _ $00 51372.70 38 Jose Angel Uribe, at us 50 0 R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front 5475 per ft. _ $487.5 4 606 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0.0 Corp. Christi, TX '8415 148. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R.' _ $148. 606 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft.' = $0.0( Lot 14, Block 2 173, ft.' 13 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft' _ $896.1 rooklawn 0, R' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' = $0. 1050.0002-0140 0. R' No Extras $0.00 per ft' = S0. -IB 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $0. SI531.64 Page 5 22 2002 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised August dimer Nat" aid Asamsmeot Asan4meat Aa4epamese Asa6a4meaP TOW Item.. Pro ,oucri tion aR ,.. Dracri Rate. Amount Amount 39 Nana Saucedt 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per R = S487.5 602 Brookdale Dr. 0. R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. = $0. orpus Christi, 7X-8415 160. R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per fl.' = $160. 602 Brookdale or. 0. R.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 par fl.' = S0. of 13, Black 2 140, fl.' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per fl.' = $725.2 rooklawn 0. fl.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl.' = S0. 1050-0002-0130 0. fl' No Extras $0.00 per R' $0. -IB 0.0 R' No Extras $0.00 per fl' 51 72.70 40 Be Rivera, Jr 50. fl. Curb. Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9.75 per fl. $487.5 854 Bentwood 854 0. fl. Cub, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. = $0.0 orpus Christi, TX -8415 140. R ° 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R' _ $140. 346 Brookdale Dr. 0. R' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' $0. Lot 12, Block 195. R' 15 fl. Wide Driveway $5.18 per fl' _ $1010.1 rooklawn 0. ft.' No Second Driveway 55.18 per ft? = $0. 1050-0002-0120 0. It, No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 -IB 0. fl.' No Exhas $0.00 per R' = S0, $l 637.60 41 ichard S Rivera, er ux 50, fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement -Front $9.75 per R. = 5487.5 541 Brookdale Dr, 0. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. = SOq orpus Christi, TX -8415 152. fl.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R' _ $152. 542 Brooki Dr. 0. R.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R' _ $0. of 11, Block 2 162. R.' 12 R. Wide Driveway $5.18 pa R.' $839.1 rooklawn 0. R' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $(t ]050-0002-0100 0. ft.' No Extras 50.00 per R.' - S0, -IB 0, fl.' No Extras $0.00 per R' _ $0, 42 ichard S Rivera, ei ux 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per ft. = S487.5 $1.479.661 542 Brookdale Or 0. R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. - $0. Corpus Christi. TX -8415 156.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R.' = S156. 542 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 R.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R' = S0, Lot 10, Block 2 151, ft.' 11 R. Wide Driveway $5.18 per R' _ $782.1 rooklawn 0. ft.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft' _ $0.0 1050-0001-0100 0. R' No Extras $0.00 per R' = 50. -IB 0. fl.' No Extras $0.00 per R' = $0. 43 ldefonso Alvarez 50.0 R. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - From 59.75 per R. = $487.5 $1,425.68 534 Brookdale De 0.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. _ $0. arpus Christi, TX -8415 160. R.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Front 51.00 per R.' = S160. 534 Brookdale Dr. 0. F1' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per fl.' = 560 Lot 9, Block 2 125. fl.' 10 R. out of 20 ft. Wide Shared Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $647.5 rooklawn 0.0 R' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' = $0.0( 1050-0002-0090 0. R.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' = Il -IB 0. fl.' No Extras $0.00 per fl.' = 0. SI 293.00 44 ase C. Rivera, at ux 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front 59.75 per 11 _ $48Z5 530 Brookdale Dc 0. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4,88 per ft. Corpus Christi, TX '84/5 160. R' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front 51.00 per R.' _ $160. 530 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per ft = 50. Lot 8, Block 2 125. fl.' 10 ft. out of 20 R. Wide Shared Driveway 55.18 per fl.' = $647.5 rooklawn 0. R.' No Second Driveway S5.18 pm B = $0.0 1050.0002-0080 0. R' No Extras 50.00 per R.' S0.0 -IB 0, fl.' No Extras 50.00 per R.' _ $0. $1.295.00 45 uben R. Corm, el or 50. R. Cub, Gutter, and Pavement - Front 59.75 per fl. = S4825 a Maria L. Cantu 0. R. Curb, Cutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft = S0.6 orpas Christi, TX '8415 156.0 R.' 4ft. Wide Sidewalk - From $L00 per fl' _ $156. 526 Brookdale Dr. 0. R.' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk -Side $0.50 Petri: _ $0. of 7, Block 2 151.0 ft.' 11 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per R. _ $782.1 rooklawn 0. fl.' No Second Driveway $5.18 $00 1050.0002-0070 0. R' No Expos $0.00 per R.' _ $0. -IB 0. R' No Extras $$0.00 per ft.' _ $0. 46 orlos Moreno, et ux 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavemrnt -Front 59.75 per fl. = $487.5 $I 425.68 521 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0. orpus Christi, TX -8415 160. R' 4fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft.' _ $160. 522 Brookdale Dr. 0. R' 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' _ $0. of 6, Block 2 140. R' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per R.' = S725.2 rooklawn 0.0 R' No Second Driveway $5.18 per R.' _ $0. 1050.0002-0060 0. R.' No Extras $0.00 per fl.' = SOA -IB 0, fl.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' = 0. 51 72.70 Page 6 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised Au t22.2 ihvaerNarle and AS$Mmmt Aae teuegt `Aaamyoledt Aaea+mem Total.. Item. Pro Dtaeri non an Dead lien Balm Amount Amount 47 Zuben, Cantu 50. fl. Curb, Cutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per A. = S487.5 533 Go dan 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per ft. _ $0. orpus Christi, TX-841 160. fl.' 4 it. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per ft' = $160.0 518 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R2 = $o. of 5, Block 2 140. ft' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $725.2 rooklawn 0. ft' No Second Driveway $5.18 per fl.' = 50.0 1050-0002-0050 0.0 fl.' No Extras $0.00 per fl.' _ $0. -IB 0. fl' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 $1.372.70 48 mar V. Salinas 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front $9.75 per R = $4825 514 Brookatale Dr. 0.0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side $4.88 per fl. _ $0. orpus Chrisri, TX -8415 160. it' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front r $1.00 per ft.' = S160. 514 Brookdale Dr. 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side C, $0.50 per ft' _ $0. of 4, Block 2 140. ft' 10 fl. Wide Driveway C, $5.18 per fl.' _ $725.2 rooklawn 0. ft' No Second Driveway C $5.18 per ft? _ $0.0 10504l002-0040 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per B? _ $0. -IB 0. ft.' No Extras $0.00 per ' R = 0.0 11 372.70 49 Zicardo Cru Crier, et uz 50. fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front r $9.75 per ft. 5487.5 805 Gollihar Rd. 0 0 IL Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side S4.88 per B. = S0. orpus Christi, 7X -8415 160.0 fl.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft? _ $160. 510 Brookdale Dr. 0.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft.' _ $0. of 3, Block 2 134b( fl.' 10 ft. Wide Driveway $5.18 per R' _ $694.1 rooklewn ON fl.' No Second Driveway $5.18 per ft.' _ $0. 105041002-0030 0.0 fl? No Exnas $0.00 per R' _ $0.0 -1B 00 ft' No Extras $000 per fl.' = $0. $I41.62 50 Adrian G. Gonzales 71.7 ft. Curb, Goner, and Pavement - Front $9.75 Per fl. _ $699.0 13' Goilihar Rd 0. ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side Ca 54.88 per ft. = 10. arpus Christi, TX -8415 247.8 V 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ca $1.00 per ft? _ $247.8 506 Brookdale Dr. 0. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk- Side 50.50 per ft? - - $0. otl-A, Block 138.0 ft' 28 ft. Wide Driveway Ca $5.18 per ft.' = $1,750.8 rooklawn 0.0 ft ' No Second Driveway Ca $5.18 per fl.' _ $0.0 1050-0002-0010 0. fl.' No Extras Ca $0.00 per ft.' _ MIX -111 0.0 fl.' No Extras Ca $0.00 per ft.' _ $0. 52 697.76 Gollihar Ad. latecuon ers End Brookdale Dr. - East Side Begin Whiting Dr. - South Side From Churchill Dr. to Lanier Dr, SI Valdemar Cavazos 280. ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per fl.' _ $280.00 01 Whiting Dr. 0. ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per fl.' _ $0.00 orpus Christi, 7X -8415 0.00 ft.' No Pieria$0.00 per R'$0.00 1701 Whiting Dr. 0.00 ft.' No Extras @ $0.00 per fl? _ $0.00 of 27, Block 1 nada Park 745-0001-0270 1B $280.00 52 Isavidil. Lewandos ON ft. Curb. Gutter, and Pavement - Front C $9.75 per ft. _ $0.0 858 Leopard St 0 0 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Side Ca $4.88 per fl. S0.00 Corpus Christi, TX -8408 240. ft' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front ca $1.00 Per ft' _ $240.00 1705 WhiOng Dr. 0. ft ' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 per fl?$0.00 Lot 26, Block I 0A ft.' No Extras ca $0.00 per 0.' _ $0.00 r 'eds Park 0.0 ft.' No ExtrasC. $0.00 per ft? _ so.00 745.0001-0260 1B 5240.00 53 Daniel C. Benmidez 240.0 ' Ili 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ca $1.00 per ft' _ $240.0 i'09 Whiting Dr. 0 0 fl? 4 0. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R' _ $0.0 .orpus Christi, TX -8415 O.Oc fl.' No Extras $0.00 Per = $0. 1709 Whiting Dr. 00 ft' No Extras $000 Per R.? ' - $0. 00 of 25, Block 1 neda Park 745-0001-0250 1B 5240.00 Page 7 2 0 22 2002 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. ,Item.agglis Orvxr Milan sad P. Dtacri Anwaria t ad ' ... Aam4mgtt Detcri don Aa+aa4fenf...: Rate Revised August A4r wt AmdsaE `FabP+: . Arn4nnt 54 rancisco ondJumna Ridriguez 240. ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per R. - f240 13 Whiting Dr. 0, ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft. = $0.0( drrp e, Christi, TX "8415 0.0 R.' No Extras 50.00 per fl.2 - $0.0 1713 Whiting Dr. 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' = $00(. of 24, Block 1 neda Park 745-0001-0240 -16 55 aria S Vasquez, el ux 240. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Fronk $1.00 per ft' 5240. 5240.00 TI' Whiting Dr. 0, fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per fl ° = S0. arlw Christi, TX -8415 0. ft.' No Extras 50.00 per R.' - - $0. 1717 Whiting De 0. R' No Extras $0.00 per ft' = $0.0( Lot 23, Block 1 neda Park 745-0001-0230 WB 56 ary L. Smdow, e/ ux 240. fl' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 pa ft' $240.0 $240.00 91'Blue Angel 0.0 ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk -Side $0.50 per fl.2 = S0. aerw Christi, TX -8417 0,0C R' No Extras f0.00 per ft? - - $0. 1721 Whiting Dr. 0.0 ft' No Extras $0.00 perfl' til. t 23, Block 1 neda Park 745-0001-0220 1B 57 ary L S/rad/ner, e/ ux 240.0 R. 4 R. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 pa R.' $240.00 $240.00 191-Blue Angel -8412 0.0 R. 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' _ $0.0 orpus Christi, TX 0. R.' No Extras 50.00 per ft' - - f0. 1725 Whiting Dc 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' = $0. of 21, Block 1 neda Park 7450001-0210 -1B 58 aria de Jr-VdVillarreal 240.0 R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1 00 pa 112 = $240.00 $240.00 12 -th Sr. 0.0 R.2 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 pa ft.' = SO.00 osenberg, TX 77471-/922 0, ft' No Extras $0.00 per fl.' _ $0.0 1729 Whiting Dr. 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per R.' _ $0. of 20, Block I 'neda Park 7450001-0200 1B 59 au( D. Perez, et ux 240, ft. 4 R. Wide Sidewalk -Front $1.00 per ft.' = 5240. 00 5240.00 180/ Whiling Dr. 0. ft. 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft' = $0.0 orpus Christi, TX -8415 0. ft' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0, 1801 Whiting Dr. 0,0C R.' No Extras $0.00 per ft' = 0.0 of 19, Block 1 neda Park 745-0001-0190 -IB 60 Adolfo Trevino, et ux 240, ft' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front 51.00 per R' $240.00 $240.00 805 Whiting Dr. 0.0 R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per ft' _ $0. orpus Christi, 7X -8415 0. ft.' No Extras S0.00 per R' _ $600 1805 Whiting Dr. 0. ft' No Extras 50.00 per fl.' - - $0.0 ot 18, Block I neda Park 7450001-0180 IB 61 ra A. Medina and Loma Aland 24 ft' 4 it. Wide Sidewalk - Front 51.00 per R' = $240.0 $240.00 1809 Whiting Dr. 0.0 R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side fp,50 pe R.' - - $0.00 orpus Christi, TX `8415 0.0 ft' - No Extras $0.00 per fl.' _ $0. 1809 Whiting Dr. 0.0 ft.' No Extras 50.00 per fl.' = 50. of 17, Block 1 hied. Park 745-0001-0170 IB szao.00 Page 8 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised August 22 .2 Owner No;; and Assonant Attainment'Assessment Asommaent Total Item.. Pro Dmcri tion 06 Deactivating slate _ Amount Amon 62 rank S Ramos 232. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 er ft p' _ $232.04 /813 Whiting Dr. 0. R.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft.' = $0. orpus Chrisli, TX -8415 0. 112 No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0. 1813 Whiting Dr. 0.0 fl.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.00 of 16, Black 1 eds Park 745-0001-0160 1B $232.04 63 phriom L. Leos 620.2 fl.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk -From $1.00 per fl.' = $620.2 81-"l ung Dr. 0, 112 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 perfl' _ $0. Corpus Christi, TX -8415 0. R' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' = S0. 1817 Whiting Dr. 0. R' No Extras 50.00 per ft3 = $0.0 Lot 15, Block 1 oda Park 745 -MI -0150 lB $620.28 Lanier Dr. Intersection End Whiting Dr. - South Side Begin Whiting Dr. - North Side From Lanier Dr. to Churchill Dr.. 64 odoljnC Delgado 162. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 MRM _ $162.0 /23 Lanier Dr. 0. fl.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per fl.' _ $0.0 orpas Christi, TX "8415 0. fl.' No Extras $0.00 per fl.' S0. 123 Lanier 0. fl.' No Extras $0.00 per fO = S0. of 26, Block 2 neda Park 745-0002-0260 IB $162.00 65 ate. D. de los Santos 158. R' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk -Front $ 1.Werft.' p _ $158.0 119 Lanier Dr 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per R.' _ $0.0 .rpm Chrisli, TX -8415 0. R° No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 119 Lanier Dr. 0.0 R' No Extras 50.00 per ft.' _ $0.00 0125, Block 2 neda Park 745-0002-0240 iB $158.00 66 ate. D. de los Santos 163. ft. 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft.' _ $163.00 /19 Lanier Dr. 0. ft. 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per ti' _ $0.00 orpus Christi, TX -8415 0. ft.' No Extras $000 pm If? _ $0.00 119 Lanier Dr. 0. ft.' No Extras 50.00 per R' _ $O.d of 24, Block 2 ineda Park 745-0002-0240 IB $163.00 67 Norco Martinez 263.3 fl.' 4ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front G $1.00 peril.- = $263.36 818 Whiting Dr. 0. fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca,$0.50 perft.' _ $0.00 orpus Christi, TX -8415 0. fl.' No Extras C $0.00 per ft' _ $0.00 1818 Whiting Dr. 0. fl.' No Extras @ $0.00 per fl.' _ $0.00 of 23, Block 2 neda Park 745-0002-0230 IB $26336 68 Thomas S C.chron 252.2 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1,00 pm R.' _ $252.2 130 -Saratoga Blvd 0 0 R' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 peril.' = $0.0 Corpus Christi, TX -841--3334 0.0 fl.' No Extras $0.00 per ft' _ $0.0 1814 Whiting Dr. 0. R' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' Lot 22, Block 2 _ ineda Pa2:rk _ 745-000220 -1B 5252.20 Page 9 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. Revised AB ust 22 2002 Page 10 -Owner Name and Aase•smant A6antsheitt Assessment-' Asseaemont Total. Item. Pro Deuri Bd• a•ti an Derc%i • Rate Amnimt Amousmsnt 69 eldo C. Mungutasmn 252,OC ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front ca §1.00 per ft.' = $252.0 344 Dempsey Are. O.0 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 per R' = $0.0 Orth Hills, CA 91343-1909 0.00 V No Extras Ca $0.00 per ft' = SO.00 1810 Whiting Dr. ON ft' No Extraz ca $0.00 per ft.' _ $0. t 21, Block 2 neda Park 745-0002-0210 1B §252.00 70 rank A. Sontos 252.0 ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ca $1.00 per ft' _ $25200 1806 Whiling Dr. 0. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft' _ $0.00 orpus Christi, 7X -8415 O.Oc ft.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.00 1806 Whiting Dr. 0 00 fl.' No Extras @ $0.00 per R'$0.00 of 20, Block 2 nada Park 745-0002-0200 IB 5252.00 71 Joseph A. Wilburn280. fl ° 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft.' e $280.00 802 Whiling Dr. OR ft' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 per ft' _ §0. orpus Christi, TX -8415 OM R' No Extras @ $0.00 per ft' = 50.0 1802 Whiting Dr. 0,00 ft' No Extras @ $0.00 per fl.' _ Wo of 19, Block 2 neda Park 7450002-0190 1B $280.00 R fqvi,, Sun Enterprises, Ltd. 288. ft.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk -Front C $1.00 per R' = $288.0 130 Boca R,,lon Dr O.Oc ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side $0.50 per ft' = Mil .,pus Christi, TX -8413 0.0 ft.' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' = S0.0 1726 Whiting Dr. 0.0 ft.' No Extras $0.00 per R' = $0.0 of 7, Block 3 ineda Park 745-0003-0070 -IB $288.00 73 alma Balderas 240.0 fl.' Oft. Wide Sidcwa8r-Front @ 57.00 Mft.' = 5240. "12 Whiting Dr 0.00 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per fl.' = 0.0 Corpus Christi, TX B4/5 0.00 ft.' No Extras §0.00 per fl.' 50.0 $ 1722 Whiting Dr. 0.0 fl.' No Extras Ca $0.00 per ft' = $0.0 Lot 6, Block 3 ineda Park 745-00034)060 1B $240.00 74 mina C. Nettles 240. ft.' 4 fl. Wide Sidewalk -Front $100 per ft.' = $240. 7-18 Whiting Dr. 0. R' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side 50.50 per R.' = 0.0 orpus Christi, TX -8415 0. R.' No Extraz 50.00 per ft' = $ 50.0 1718 Whiting Dr. 0.0 R' No Extras50,00 per ft.' _ $0.0 of 5, Block 3 nedo Park 745.0003-0050 IB $240.00 75 my L. Stmdtner, el ur 24 BP 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front $1.00 per ft' _ $240.00 91 -Blue Angel 0.00 fl.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side Ca $0.50 per fl.' _ $0. orpas Christi, TX -8411 Obo ft' No Extras 9 $0.00 per fl.' _ $0.0 1714 Whiting Dr. 0.0 ft' No Extras $0.00 per ft.' _ $0.0 of 4, Black 3 ineda Park 745.0003.0040 -1B $240.00 76 nronio Ochoo 240. ft.' 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front Ca $1.00 per ft.' = S240,00 X10 Whiting Dr. 0.0 ft' 4 8, Wide Sidewalk - Side r $0.50 per fl.' = 50.0 orpus Christi, TX -8415 O.Oc ft.' No ExtrasCa $0.00 per fl.' _ $0.0 1710 Whiting Dr. 0.0 ft! No Extras $0.00 per ft ° = 50.0 Lot 3, Block 3 Pined* Park 7410003-0030 IB 5240.00 Page 10 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Brookdale Dr. and Whiting Dr. 77 ?resencioPerez 240.0tiff? 4f(.WideSidewalk-Fronl ~ $1.00 ~erR? S240.0~ ~'06 Whit/ng Dr. 0.00fl.~ 4 ft. Wid~ Sidewalk - Sid~ ~ ~0.50 ~i' f~? $0.0~ Page 11 20 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 2002 SUBJECT: Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Starlite Lane (Project No. 6138) BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJECT C-2R AGENDA ITEM: A. Public Hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highways in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: · Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Starlite Lane Ordinance closing the public hearing on proposed assessments for improvements to the following highways in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: · Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Starlite Lane imposing assessments totaling $101,144.31 against property abutting the improvements, affected railways, and property and railway owners; fixing corresponding liens on property and charges against property owners; providing for subsequent adjustment of assessment amounts and the corresponding liens and charges based on as-built conditions; specifying assessment payment terms and lien enforcement measures; and declaring an emergency. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award a construction contract in the amount of $1,090,531.35 with W. T. Young Construction for the Annaville Road Street Improvements from Violet Road to Stadite Lane (BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJEC'r). ISSUE: Annaville Road is a rural road section with inadequate shoulders, roadside ditches, and no sidewalks and need to be reconstructed to urban standards. Reconstruction will provide smoother riding surface, improve drainage, and increased pedestrian safety; and fulfill property owner requests for street and sidewalk improvements. FUNDING: Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Street Bond Fund and Utilities Commercial Paper Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance and Motion as presented. t¢:~"~g~TR. ~'s~obar, P.E., ' Director of Engineering Services Additional Support Material: Exhibit "A" Background Information Exhibit "B" Project Budget Exhibit "C" Bid Tabulation Exhibit "D" Location Map SUBJECT: Annaville Road Street Improvements (from Violet Road to Stadite Lane) (Project No. 6138) BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJECT NO. C-2R PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. November 14, 2000 - Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the Special Election held on November 7, 2000, in the City of Corpus Christi for the adoption of seven propositions; adopting and levying a sales and use tax pursuant to Section 4A of The Development Corporation Act as approved by the voters in Propositions 4 and 5 (Ordinance No. 024269). 2. March 27, 2001 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an engineering services contract in the amount of $398,314 with Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, Inc. for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction at the following sites: · Woodlawn Drive · Birmingham Street · Lyons Street · Brookdale Drive · Whiting Drive · Annaville Road PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. October 18, 2000 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms. 2. November 10, 2000 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms. 3. January 10, 2001 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2000-08 - (Public Health and Safety, Parks and Recreation, Street Improvement Projects) to 73 local architectural and engineering firms. 4. June 27, 2002 - Public Meeting at Annaville Elementary School to inform Property Owners of upcoming construction improvements. BACKGROUND: The Annaville Addition No. 2 Subdivision is an older neighborhood that was originally platted in 1942. The area is comprised of residential house district. The deteriorated condition of the public infrastructure consists of street pavement in poor condition, roadside ditches that provide poor drainage, asphaltJcaliche driveways and no sidewalks. The utility water and wastewater lines are old and in need of replacement. The proposed project was approved for funding in the voter approved November 2000 Bond Election. Utility work will be accomplished prior to reconstruction of the street so that street and drainage work need not be disturbed in the future for utility replacement. The project improvements consist of new pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveways and storm drainage, plus water/~vastewater improvements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of construction of 2,530 linear feet of 28-foot back-to-back pavement, sidewalks, driveways and curb and gutter, 690 linear feet of storm sewer of various diameters; 2,450 linear feet of 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer; and 2,520 linear feet of 8-inch PVC water line together with all appurtenances as shown on the plans and called for in the specifications. CONTRACT BIDS: The preliminary assessment roll is based on bid proposals received for the project on Wednesday, August 14, 2002. The project consists of a Base Bid; and two (2) Additive Alternates. Additive Alternate No. 1 specifies two-inch caliche base; and Additive Alternate No. 2 specifies 1-inch of hot mixed asphaltic concrete. EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 W. T. Young Construction of Corpus Christi, Texas was the lowest responsible bidder on the Base Bid at $1,090,531.35. The engineer's estimate is $907,700. Five (5) bid proposals were received; and the bids of the Base Bid range from $1,090,531.35 to $1,411,453.80. CONTRACT TERMS: The contract specifies that the project will be completed in 275 calendar days with completion anticipated by the end of September 2003. FUNDING: Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Street Bond Fund and Utilities Commercial Paper Program. EXHIBIT "A" [ Page 2 of 2 PROJECT BUDGET BOND ISSUE 2000 PROJECT C2R NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION ANNAVILLE DRIVE (Project No. 6138) October 11,2002 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Streets ............................................................................................. "/"- $554,362.14 Storm Water .................................................................................... 158,691.09 Wastewater ....................................................................................... 396,019.21 Water ............................................................................................. 247,440.05 Total ................................................................................................... $1,356,512.49 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction (W. T. Young Construction): Street ........................................................................... Storm Water ................................................................. Wastewater .................................................................. Water ......................................................................... $426,082.75 127,669.60 335,537.00 201,242.00 Subtotal Construction ............................................................................. $1,090,531.35 Contingencies ......................................................................................... 109,053.14 Land Acquisition ..................................................................................... 0.00 Consultant (Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez) ....................................................... 113,520.00 Consultant (Goldston Engineering, Inc.) ....................................................... 5,188.00 Consultant (James K. Lontos, P. E.) ....................................................... 599.66 Engineering Reimbursements ................................................................... 9,609.67 Finance Reimbursements .......................................................................... 10,467.97 Testing ................................................................................................ 4,339.74 Bond Issuance Expense .......................................................................... 6,308.77 Miscellaneous (Printing, Advertising, etc.) ................................................... 6,894.19 Total ................................................................................................... $1,356,512.49 EXHIBIT"B" Page 1 of I BID TABULATION BIDS TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services BID DATE: Wednesday, August 14,2002 Date: Engineers Estimate: Calendar Days: 8114/02 $907,700.00 275 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 W.T. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 KING -ISLES, INC. 1641 Goldston Rd. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART A - STREET, SIDEWALK AND DRIVES A-1 Street Excavation 8,750 S.Y. $6.70 $58,625.00 $10.25 $89,687.50 $13.50 $118,125.00 A-2 8" Compacted Subgrade With Geogrid 8,750 S.Y. $5.50 $48,125.00 $4.33 $37,887.50 $4.50 $39,375.00 A-3 6"2% Lime Stabilized Caliche Base 8,750 S.Y. $7.00 $61,250.00 $5.79 $50,662.50 $6.90 $60,375.00 A-4 HMAC - 1-1/2" Type "D" W/Prime 7,580 S.Y. $5.50 $41,690.00 $6.05 $45,859.00 $4.75 $36,005.00 A-5 6" Curb and Gutter 5,176 L.F. $9.20 $47,619.20 $11.68 $60,455.68 $9.50 $49,172.00 A-6 4' Sidewalk and Turnouts 20,599 S.F. $3.25 $66,946.75 $4.01 $82,601.99 $3.25 $66,946.75 A-7 Concrete Driveway 9,137 S.F. $4.50 $41,116.50 $5.35 $48,882.95 $5.50 $50,253.50 A-8 Concrete Curb Ramps 450 S.F. $19.00 $6,550.00 $15.20 $6,840.00 $15.00 $6,750.00 A-9 Traffic Control Pian 1 L.S. $9,084.00 $9,084.00 $8,764.66 $8,764.66 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 A-10 Ozone Day 1 Each $200.00 $200.00 $1,095.58 $1,095.58 $100.00 $100.00 A-11 Remove Abandoned Structures 1 L.S. $2,912.00 $2,912.00 $3,637.63 $3,637.63 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 A-12 Relocate Signs & Mailboxes 1 L.S. $4,480.00 $4,480.00 $3,465.43 $3,465.43 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 A-13 6" Sidewalk Header Curb 1,167 L.F. $11.40 $13,303.80 $10.00 $11,670.00 $12.50 $14,587.50 A-14 Remove Existing Curb and Gutter 153 L.F. $2.00 $306.00 $14.92 $2,282.76 $7.50 $1,147.50 A-15 Remove Existing Sidewalk 160 S.F. $1.30 $208.00 $3.81 $609.60 $2.50 $400.00 A-16 Sawcut and Remove 2-1/2" of Bituminous Surface at Stadite Lane and Annaville Road Intersection. Provide and install new 2-1/2" HMAC, Type "D" Wearing Course. 154 S.Y. $40.00 $6,160.00 $22.13 $3,408.02 $12.00 $1,848.00 A-17 At Violet Road and Annaville Road Intersection, Sawcut and Remove Existing 4-1/2" of Bituminous Surface. Provide New 3" HMAC Type "B" (380 lbs/S.Y.) and 1-1/2" HMAC Type "D" (165 lbs/S.Y.) 120 S.Y. $40.00 $4,800.00 $73.99 $8,878.80 $20.00 $2,400.00 A 18 Relocate Existing Fence Within R.O.W. to R.O.W. Line 315 L.F. $12.30 $3,874.50 $14.85 $4,677.75 $15.00 $4,725.00 A-19 Remove Existing Asphalt or Dirt Drive to R.O.W. or as Shown on the Plans, Backfill Existing Roadside Ditch and Shape to Final Line 1 L.S. $6,832.00 $6,832.00 $2,952.40 $2,952.40 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 TOTAL PART "A"- STREET, SIDEWALK AND DRIVES - ITEMS (A 1 -A 19) $426,082.75 $474,319.75 $508,710.25 Page 1 of 10 Page 2 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 W.T. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 INS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 I KING-ISLES, INC. 1641 Goldston Rd. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART B -STORM SEWER B-1 33' RCP Storm Sewer 15 L.F. $64.00 $950.00 $110.42 $1,656.30 $75.00 $1,125.00 B-2 30' RCP Storm Sewer 27 L.F. $63.00 $1,701.00 $95.59 $2,580.93 $65.00 $1,755.00 B3 27" RCP Storm Sewer 50 L.F. $63.00 $3,150.00 $71.45 $3,572.50 $45.00 $2,250.00 B-4 24" RCP Storm Sewer 60 L.F. $48.00 $2,880.00 $50.80 $3,048.00 $35.00 $2,100.00 B-5 18" RCP Storm Sewer 475 L.F. $35.00 $16,625.00 $40.00 $19,000.00 $25.00 $11,875.00 B-6 15" RCP Storm Sewer 136 L.F. $32.00 $4,352.00 $79.77 $10,848.72 $27.50 $3,740.00 B-7 Type "A' Storm Sewer Manhole 2 Each $2,184.00 $4,368.00 $2,261.80 $4,523.60 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 B-8 5' Curb Inlet 10 Each $1,570.00 $15,700.00 $2,000.00 $20,000.00 $1,500.00 $15,000.00 B-9 5' Curb Inlet Over Existing Une (Modified Inlet) 2 Each $2,016.00 $4,032.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 B-10 10' Curb Inlet 1 Each $2,690.00 $2,690.00 $5,216.34 $5,216.34 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 B-11 10' Curb Inlet Over Existing Line (Modified Inlet) 1 Each $3,024.00 $3,024.00 $4,700.99 $4,700.99 $2,950.00 $2,950.00 B-12 In-Pavement Grate Inlet 2 Each $2,130.00 $4,260.00 $1,947.56 $3,895.12 $1,150.00 $2,300.00 B-13 Convert Existing Inlet to Junction Box w/Ring & Cover 1 Each $1,230.00 $1,230.00 $1,508.03 $1,508.03 $650.00 $650.00 B-14 Tie Into Existing Manhole or Inlet 4 Each $900.00 $3,600.00 $594.21 $2,376.84 $450.00 $1,800.00 B-15 Remove 12", 15" or 18" Driveway Culvert or Storm Sewer 1,647 L.F. $4.00 $6,588.00 $13.04 $21,476.88 $3.00. $4,941.00 B-16 Trench Safety Plan 763 L.F. $2.50 $1,907.50 $3.91 $2,983.33 $2.00 - $1,526.00 B-17 Topsoil and Grass Seeding 1,330 S.F. $1.00 $1,330.00 $1.50 $1,995.00 $0.40 -. $532.00 B-18 Topsoil and Grass Sodding 24,914 S.F. $1.10 $27,405.40 $0.93 $23,170.02 $0.75. $18,685.50 B-19 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $9,084.00 $9,084.00 $4,382.33 $4,382.33 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 B-20 Pollution Prevention Plan 1 L.S. $5,490.00 $5,490.00 $3,658.22 $3,658.22 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 B-21 Remove Existing 1 Each $670.00 $670.00 $673.34 $673.34 $200.00 $200.00 B-22 Remove Existing Concrete Rip-Rap 180 S.F. $1.40 $252.00 $2.66 $478.80 $1.75 $315.00 B-23 Remove Existing 24" RCP 31 L.F. $5.00 $155.00 $59.73 $1,851.63 $7.50 $232.50 B-24 Remove Existing 33" RCP 17 L.F. $6.10 $103.70 $65.70 $1,116.90 $10.00 $170.00 B-25 Plug and Seal Existing Storm Sewer Manhole 3 Each $784.00 $2,352.00 $647.03 $1,941.09 $150.00 $450.00 B 26 Break Top of Existing Storm Sewer Inlet and Reconstruct Top With New Ring and Cover 2 Each $1,230.00 $2,460.00 $1,161.21 $2,322.42 $750.00 $1,500.00 B-27 Safety End Treatment for 18" RCP 2 Each $650.00 $1,300.00 $868.75 $1,737.50 $450.00 $900.00 SUBTOTAL PART "B" - STORM SEWER - ITEMS (81-B27) $127,669.60 $154,714.83 $96,647.00 Page 2 of 10 Page 3 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 W.T. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 KING4SLES, INC. 1641 Goldston Rd. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 01 PART C -SANITARY SEWER 8" PVC Wastewater, 4'-6' Cut 390 L.F. $32.00 $12,480.00 $39.57 $15,432.30 $50.00 $19,500.00 C-2 8" PVC Wastewater, 6'-8' Cut 370 L.F. $49.00 $18,130.00 $47.58 $17,604.60 $60.00 $22,200.00 C-3 8' PVC Wastewater, V-10' Cut 620 L.F. $55.00 $34,100.00 $59.03 $36,598.60 $90.00 $55,800.00 C-4 8' PVC Wastewater, 10'-12' Cut 480 L.F. $75.00 $36,000.00 $69.16 $33,196.80 $115.00 $55,200.00 G5 8' PVC Wastewater, 12'-14' Cut 300 L.F. $87.00 $26,100.00 $81.30 $24,390.00 $150.00 $45,000.00 C-6 8' PVC Wastewater, 14'-16' Cut 180 L.F. $110.00 $19,800.00 $86.51 $15,571.80 $180.00 $32,400.00 C-7 6" PVC Service, Near Side 26 Each $540.00 $14,040.00 $671.65 $17,462.90 $800.00 $20,800.00 08 6" PVC Service, Far Side 25 Each $920.00 $23,000.00 $1,312.37 $32,809.25 $1,100.00 $27,500.00 G9 jDeep Cut Connection 321 Each $705.00 $22,560.00 $682.05 $21,825.60 $450.00 $14,400.00 C-10 Manhole, 4'-6' Deep 1 Each $2,370.00 $2,370.00 $2,203.76 $2,203.76 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 011 Manhole, 6'-8' Deep 1 Each $2,960.00 $2,960.00 $2,340.34 $2,340.34 $2,950.00 $2,950.00 C-12 Manhole, V-10' Deep 2 Each $3,160.00 $6,320.00 $2,518.14 $5,036.28 $3,200.00 $6,400.00 C-13 Manhole, 10'-12' Deep 1 Each $6,740.00 $6,740.00 $6,314.84 $6,314.84 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 C-14 Manhole, 14'-16' Deep, 5' Dia. 1 Each $8,300.00 $8,300.00 $8,177.02 $8,177.02 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 C-15 Connect to Existing Services 51 Each $350.00 $17,850.00 $291.64 $14,873.64 $350.00 $17,850.00 016 Pavement Repair, Violet Road, Excluding HMAC Surface 120 S.Y. $35.00 $4,200.00 $60.62 $7,274.40 $45.00 $5,400.00 C-17 Trench Safety Plan 2,340 L.F. $3.50 $8,190.00 $4.28 $10,015.20 $2.00 $4,680.00 C-18 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $9,084.00 $9,084.00 $5,477.92 $5,477.92 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 C-19 Remove Existing Manhole Tops & Fill With Grout 4 Each $1,070.00 $4,280.00 $766.38 $3,065.52 $500.00 - $2,000.00 C-20 Grout Existing 8" PVC Wastewater Lines 2,311 L.F. $6.00 $18,488.00 $8.51 $19,666.61 $6.00 $13,866.00 021 Rehabilitate Existing Wastewater Manhole Within Violet Road Intersection Using a 5 -Foot Diameter FRP (14'-16 Depth) 1 Each $6,950.00 $6,950.00 $7,448.25 $7,448.25 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 022 Rehabilitate Existing Wastewater Manhole Located Nong Annaville Road at 30' Utility and Road Easement Using a 4 -Foot Diameter FRP (6-8' Dept) 1 Each $2,120.00 $2,120.00 $2,091.61 $2,091.61 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 C-23 Grout Existing 6" Wastewater Service Lines Within R.O.W. 1,275 L.F. $9.00 $11,475.00 $7.96 $10,149.00 $5.00 $6,375.00 024 Special Wastewater Allowance 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART 'C' - SANITARY SEWER - ITEMS (C1 -C24) $335,537.00 $339,026.24 $402,571.00 Page 3 of 10 uo� Page 4 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 W.T. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 9197 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 IHS CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 8354 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 KING -ISLES, INC. 1641 Goldston Rd. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT D-1 PART D -WATER 8' 6900 PVC Waterline 2,465 L.F. $21.60 $53,244.00 $19.31 $47,599.15 $22.00 $54,230.00 D-2 8" Ductile Iron Waterline 141 L.F. $31.00 $4,371.00 $39.64 $5,589.24 $50.00 $7,050.00 D-3 6' Ductile Iron Waterline 20 L.F. $29.00 $580.00 $44.81 $896.20 $40.00 $800.00 D-4 8" Gate Valve 9 Each $900.00 $8,100.00 $992.70 $8,934.30 $875.00 $7,875.00 D-5 6" Gate Valve 1 Each $720.00 $720.00 $677.38 $677.38 $650.00 $650.00 D-6 8"450,22-1/20 or 11-1/40 Bend, D.I.M.J. 23 Each $310.00 $7,130.00 $288.10 $6,626.30 $380.00 $8,740.00 D-7 8"x 8' x 8" Tee, D.I.M.J. 2 Each $412.00 $824.00 $275.94 $551.88 $400.00 $800.00 D-8 8" x 8" x 6" Tee D.I.M.J. 1 Each $340.00 $340.00 $362.10 $362.10 $390.00 $390.00 D-9 12' x 12" x W Tapping Tee for Tre-In 1 Each $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,779.67 $2,779.67 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 D-10 16'450 Bend, D.I.M.J. 2 Each $165.00 $330.00 $217.97 $435.94 $275.00 $550.00 D-11 6" Cap, D.I.M.J. 2 Each $112.00 $224.00 $135.00 $270.00 $475.00 $950.00 D-12 6' Gate Valve 1 Each $720.00 $720.00 $651.76 $651.76 $650.00 $650.00 D-13 Tie to Existing 8" Waterline 3 Each $670.00 $2,010.00 $697.61 $2,092.83 $725.00 $2,175.00 D-14 Tie to Existing 6" Waterline 1 Each $660.00 $660.00 $676.01 $676.01 $675.00 $675.00 D-15 Fire Hydrant Assembly 6 Each $2,920.00 $17,520.00 $2,768.51 $16,611.06 $2,750.00 $16,500.00 D-16 Remove Existing Fire Hydrant & Store for Water Department Pickup 3 Each $1,008.00 $3,024.00 $356.24 $1,068.72 $350.00, $1,050.00 D-17 1" Single Service Connection, Near Site 25 Each $480.00 $12,000.00 $613.92 $15,348.00 $375.00 $9,375.00 D-18 1' Single Service Connection, Far Side 25 Each $610.00 $15,250.00 $365.91 $9,147.75 $700.00 $17,500.00 D-19 1-1/2" Double Service Connection, Near Side 1 Each $1,110.00 $1,110.00 $1,078.96 $1,078.96 $950.00 $950.00 D-20 Connect to Existing Services 50 Each $200.00 $10,000.00 $217.87 $10,893.50 $150.00 $7,500.00 D-21 Trench Safety Plan 2,626 L.F. $1.00 $2,626.00 $2.50 $6,565.00 $1.50 $3,939.00 D-22 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $9,084.00 $9,084.00 $2,848.52 $2,848.52 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 D-23 Seal Existing Lines & Services 1 L.S. $15,200.00 $15,200.00 $6,636.26 $6,636.26 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 D-24 Special Water Allowance 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 D-25 Pavement Repair, Starlite Road, Excluding Surface 45 S.Y. $35.00 $1,575.00 $67.22 $3,024.90 $65.00 $2,925.00 D-26 8"x 8" x 8" Tapping Tee 1 Each $1,020.00 $1,020.00 $1,165.49 $1,165.49 $1,450.00 $1,450.00 D-27 8'Tapping Valve 2 Each $1,650.00 $3,300.00 $2,261.01 $4,522.02 $1,400.00 $2,800.00 D-28 Remove Existing 8" AC Waterline Including Valves and Fittings, and Dispose of Properly Meeting City, State and Federal Requirements 171 L.F. $30.00 $5,130.00 $4.85 $829.35 $12.00 $2,052.00 D-29 Remove Existing 6" AC Waterline Including Valves and Fittings, and Dispose of Properly Meeting City, State and Federal Requiremer 1 105 L.F. $30.00 $3,150.00 $7.90 $829.50 $10.00 $1,050.00 ISAJ TOTAL PART 'D' - WATER - ITEMS (D1 -D29) $201,242.00 $178,711.79 $18$626.00 mTZ AL BASE BID (PARTS A, B, C, D) $1,090,531.35 $1,146,772.61 $1,190,554.25 uo� Page 4 of 10 SUMMARY TOTAL BASE BID (PARTS A, 8, C, D) W.T. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION IHS CONSTRUCTION KING -ISLES, INC. ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET P.O. Box 9197 P.O. Box 8354 1641 Goldston Rd. IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 Corpus Christi, TX 79469 Corpus Christi, TX 78468 Corpus Christi, TX 78409 ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT TOTAL PART E - ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID NO. 1 $1,204,863.71 2" of Caliche Base (2% Lime) Compacted to 95% Modified Proctor Density (ASTM 1557-91) at 2% of E-1 Optimum Moisture. This work shall include all labor, equipment, materials and additional excavation required to achieve the lines and grades shown on the construction plans. 8,750 S.Y. $2.00 $17,500.00 $2.81 $24,587.50 $2.15 $18,812.50 PART F - ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID NO. 2 1"of Hot -Mixed -Asphaltic -Concrete T.H.D. Type "D". This work shall include all labor, equipment, F-1 materials and additional excavation required to achieve the lines and grades shown on the construction plans. 7,580 S.Y. $3.75 $28,425.00 $4.42 $33,503.60 $3.00 $22,740.00 SUMMARY TOTAL BASE BID (PARTS A, 8, C, D) $1,090,531.35 $1,146,772.61 $1,190,554.25 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 17,500.00 24,587.50 18,812.50 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 28,425.00 33,503.60 22,740.00 TOTAL $1,136,456.35 $1,204,863.71 $1,232,106.75 Page 5 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3734 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1026 Ingleside, TX 78362 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART A - STREET, SIDEWALK AND DRIVES A-1 Street Excavation 8,750 S.Y. $18.95 $165,812.50 $17.10 $149,625.00 A-2 B" Compacted Subgrade With Geogrid 8,750 S.Y. $3.27 $28,612.50 $6.60 $57,750.00 A-3 6"2% Lime Stabilized Caliche Base 8,750 S.Y. $11.13 $97,387.50 $6.30 $55,125.00 A-4 HMAC - 1-1/2" Type "D" W/Pdme 7,560 S.Y. $5.29 $40,098.20 $5.20 $39,416.00 A-5 6" Curb and Gutter 5,176 L.F. $9.00 $46,584.00 $10.00 $51,760.00 A-6 4' Skiewalk and Turnouts 20,599 S.F. $3.43 $70,654.57 $3.00 $61,797.00 A-7 Concrete Driveway 9,137 S.F. $4.37 $39,928.69 $4.80 $43,857.60 A-8 Concrete Curb Ramps 450 S.F. $27.03 $12,163.50 $14.90 $6,705.00 A-9 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $6,690.25 $6,690.25 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 A-10 Ozone Day 1 Each $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 A-11 Remove Abandoned Structures 1 L.S. $2,894.89 $2,894.69 $9,722.20 $9,722.20 AA2 Relocate Signs & Mailboxes 1 L.S. $6,512.22 $6,512.22 $2,250.50 $2,250.50 A-13 6" Sidewalk Header Curb 1,167 L.F. $10.45 $12,195.15 $7.20 $8,402.40 A-14 Remove Existing Curb and Gutter 153 L.F. $8.84 $1,352.52 $4.80 $734.40 A-15 Remove Existing Sidewalk 160 S.F. $3.38 $540.80 $3.40 $544.00 A-1 6 Sawcut and Remove 2-1/2" of Bituminous Surface at Stadite Lane and Annaville Road Intersection. Provide and install new 2-112" HMAC, Type "D" Wearing Course. 154 S.Y. $30.23 $4,655.42 $10.00 $1,540.00 A-17 At Violet Road and Annaville Road Intersection, Sawcut and Remove Existing 4-1/2" of Bituminous Surface. Provide New 3" HMAC Type 'B" (380 lbs/S.Y.) and 1-1/2" HMAC Type "D" (165 lbs/S.Y.) 120 S.Y. $42.93 $5,151.60 $20.001 $2,400.00 A-18 Relocate Existing Fence Within R.O.W. to R.O.W. Line 315 L.F. $14.29 $4,501.35 $8.70 $2,740.50 A-19 Remove Existing Asphalt or Dirt Drive to R.O.W. or as Shown on the Plans, Backfill Existing Roadside Ditch and Shape to Final Line 1 L.S. $10,541.96 $10,541.96 $3,676.90 $3,676.90 SUBTOTAL PART A"- STREET, SIDEWALK AND DRIVES - ITEMS (A1 -A19) $557,277.62 $504,046.50 Page 6 of 10 Page 7 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3734 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART B - STORM SEWER B-1 33" RCP Storm Sewer 15 L.F. $94.55 $1,418.25 $83.70 $1,255.50 B-2 30" RCP Storm Sewer 27 L.F. $78.55 $2,120.85 $77.20 $2,084.40 B-3 27" RCP Storm Sewer 50 L.F. $66.49 $3,324.50 $70.80 $3,540.00 B-4 24" RCP Storm Sewer 60 L.F. $58.57 $3,514.20 $57.90 $3,474.00 B-5 18" RCP Storm Sewer 475 L.F. $40.61 $19,209.75 $54.10 $25,697.50 B-6 15" RCP Storm Sewer 136 L.F. $36.76 $4,999.36 $48.90 $6,650.40 B-7 Type "A" Storm Sewer Manhole 2 Each $3,609.46 $7,218.92 $2,960.40 $5,920.80 B-8 5' Curb Inlet 10 Each $2,568.16 $25,681.60 $1,673.30 $16,733.00 B-9 5' Curb Inlet Over Existing Line (Modified Inlet) 2 Each $4,777.60 $9,555.20 $1,930.70 $3,861.40 B-10 10' Curb Inlet 1 Each $5,031.18 $5,031.18 $3,217.80 $3,217.80 B-11 10' Curb Inlet Over Existing Line (Modified Inlet) 1 Each $6,539.19 $6,539.19 $3,217.80 $3,217.80 B-12 In -Pavement Grate Inlet 2 Each $3,152.51 $6,305.02 $2,960.40 $5,920.80 B-13 Convert Existing Inlet to Junction Box w/Ring & Cover 1 Each $2,236.45 $2,236.45 $2,703.00 $2,703.00 B-14 Tie Into Existing Manhole or Inlet 4 Each $981.55 $3,926.20 $1,287.10 $5,148.40 B-15 Remove 12", 15" or 18" Driveway Culvert or Storm Sewer 1,647 L.F. $7.03 $11,570.41 $19.30 $31,787.10 B-16 Trench Safety Plan 763 L.F. $1.00 $763.00 $2.60 $1,983.80 B-17 Topsoil and Grass Seeding 1,330 S.F. $0.25 $332.50 $2.00 $2,660.00 B-18 Topsoil and Grass Sodding 24,914 S.F. $0.65 $16,194.10 $0.70 $17,439.80 B-19 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $6,690.25 $6,690.25 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 B-20 Pollution Prevention Plan 1 L.S. $5,905.00 $5,905.00 $2,259.20 $2,259.20 B-21 Remove Existing 1 Each $750.00 $750.00 $1,029.70 $1,029.70 8-22 Remove Existing Concrete Rip -Rap 180 S.F. $3.50 $630.00 $5.80 $1,044.00 B-23 Remove Existing 24" RCP 31 L.F. $10.00 $310.00 $25.70 $796.70 B-24 Remove Existing 33" RCP 17 L.F. $10.00 $170.00 $25.70 $436.90 B-25 Plug and Seal Existing Storm Sewer Manhole 3 Each $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $772.30 $2,316.90 8-26 Break Top of Existing Storm Sewer Inlet and Reconstruct Top With New Ring and Cover 2 Each $1,118.23 $2,236.46 $2,703.00 $5,406.00 B-27 Safety End Treatment for 18" RCP 2 Each $700.00 $1,400.00 $836.00 $1,672.00 SUBTOTAL PART 'B" - STORM SEWER - ITEMS (Bl -B27) $151,120.39 $160,756.90 Page 7 of 10 Page 8 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3734 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT G1 PART C - SANITARY SEWER W PVC Wastewater, 4'-6' Cut 390 L.F. $33.02 $12,877.80 $87.50 $34,125.00 G2 8" PVC Wastewater, 6'-8' Cut 370 L.F. $3421 $12,657.70 $92.70 $34,299.00 C-3 8" PVC Wastewater, 8'-10' Cut 620 L.F. $37.13 $23,020.60 $97.80 $60,636.00 C-4 8" PVC Wastewater, 10'-12' Cut 480 L.F. $44.04 $21,139.20 $103.00 $49,440.00 G5 8" PVC Wastewater, 17-14' Cut 300 L.F. $50.80 $15,240.00 $108.10 $32,430.00 C-6 W PVC Wastewater, 14'-16' Cut 180 L.F. $55.92 $10,065.60 $113.30 $20,394.00 G7 6" PVC Service, Near Side 26 Each $747.23 $19,427.98 $772.30 $20,079.80 C-8 6" PVC Service, Far Side 25 Each $1,068.49 $26,712.25 $901.001 $22,525.00 G9 Deep Cut Connection 32 Each $400.10 $12,803.20 $901.00 $28,832.00 C-10 Manhole, 4'-6' Deep 1 Each $2,960.70 $2,960.70 $3,217.80 $3,217.80 G11 Manhole, 6'$' Deep 1 Each $3,073.37 $3,073.37 $3,604.00 $3,604.00 G12 Manhole, 8'-10' Deep 2 Each $3,244.88 $6,489.76 $3,861.40 $7,722.80 C-13 Manhole, 10'-12' Deep 1 Each $7,792.87 $7,792.87 $10,297.10 $10,297.10 C-14 Manhole, 14'-16' Deep, 5' Dia. 1 Each $9,779.37 $9,779.37 $23,168.40 $23,168.40 G15 Conned to Existing Services 51 Each $257.24 $13,119.24 $643.60 $32,823.60 G16 Pavement Repair, Violet Road, Excluding HMAC Surface 120 S.Y. $50.00 $6,000.00 $32.50 $3,900.00 C-17 Trench Safety Plan 2,340 L.F. $1.00 $2,340.00 $2.60 $6,084.00 C-18 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $6,690.25 $6,690.25 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 G19 Remove Existing Manhole Tops 8 Ril With Grout 4 Each $800.00 $3,200.00 $1,544.60 $6,178.40 C-20 Grout Existing 8" PVC Wastewater Lines 2,311 L.F. $6.24 $14,420.64 $19.30 $44,602.30 C-21 Rehabilitate Existing Wastewater Manhole Within Violet Road Intersection Using a 5 -Foot Diameter FRP(14'-16'Depth) 1 Each $9,594.18 $9,594.18 $23,168.40 $23,168.40 C-22 Rehabilitate Existing Wastewater Manhole Located Along Annaville Road at 30' Utility and Road Easement Using a 4 -Foot Diameter FRP (6-8' Depth) 1 Each $4,359.15 $4,359.15 $5,406.00 $5,406.00 C-23 Grout Existing 6" Wastewater Service Lines Within R.O.W. 1,275 L.F. $3.77 $4,806.75 $19.30 $24,607.50 C-24 Special Wastewater Allowance 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART 'C' - SANITARY SEWER - ITEMS (C1 -C24) $268,570.61 $520,041.10 Page 8 of 10 O Page 9 of 10 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3734 F.M. 3006 Pleasanton, TX 78064 GARRETT CONST. CO. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside, TX 78362 ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNITP-R-IC-E-F AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART D - WATER D-1 8" C-900 PVC Waterline 2,465 L.F. $22.37 $55,142.05 $25.70 $63,350.50 D-2 8" Ductile Iron Waterline 141 L.F. $37.84 $5,335.44 $32.20 $4,540.20 D-3 6" Ductile Iron Waterline 20 L.F. $44.28 $885.60 $29.60 $592.00 D-4 8" Gate Valve 9 Each $1,072.24 $9,650.16 $1,094.10 $9,846.90 D-5 6" Gate Valve 1 Each $844.59 $844.59 $933.20 $933.20 D-6 8' 450, 22-12P or 11-1/40 Bend, D.I.M.J. 23 Each $305.14 $7,018.22 $514.90 $11,842.70 D-7 8'x 8"x 8" Tee, D.I.M.J. 2 Each $415.44 $830.88 $411.90 $823.80 D-8 8"x 8"x 6' Tee D.I.M.J. 1 Each 1 $395.17 $395.17 $514.901 $514.90 D-9 12" x 12" x 8" Tapping Tee for Tie -In 1 Each $5,580.09 $5,580.09 $3,861.40 $3,861.40 D-10 6" 45° Bend, D.I.M.J. 2 Each $233.73 $467.46 $386.10 $772.20 D-11 6" Cap, D.I.M.J. 2 Each $195.40 $390.80 $257.40 $514.80 D-12 6" Gate Valve 1 Each $844.59 $844.59 $933.20 $933.20 D-13 Tie to Existing 8" Waterline 3 Each $1,914.01 $5,742.03 $2,316.80 $6,950.40 D-14 Tie to Existing 6' Waterline 1 Each $1,634.82 $1,634.82 $2,059.40 $2,059.40 D-15 Fire Hydrant Assembly 6 Each $3,005.54 $18,033.24 $2,960.40 $17,762.40 D-16 Repave Existing Fire Hydrant & Store for Water Department Pickup 3 Each $850.00 $2,550.00 $1,029.70 $3,089.10 D-17 1" Single Service Connection, Near Site 25 Each $649.30 $16,232.50 $482.70 $12,067.50 D-18 1" Single Service Connection, Far Side 25 Each $819.62 $20,490.50 $611.40 $15,285.00 D-19 1-1/2' Double Service Connection, Near Side 1 Each $1,273.43 $1,273.43 $1,287.10 $1,287.10 D-20 Conned to Existing Services 50 Each $224.87 $11,243.50 $450.50 $22,525.00 D-21 Trench Safety Plan 2,626 L.F. $1.00 $2,626.00 $2.60 $6,827.60 D•22 Traffic Control Plan 1 L.S. $6,690.25 $6,690.25 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 D-23 Seal Existing Lines & Services 1 L.S. $6,085.97 $6,085.97 $6,435.70 $6,435.70 D-24 Special Water Allowance 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 D-25 Pavement Repair, Starlite Road, Excluding Surface 45 S.Y. $50.00 $2.250.00 $32.50 $1,462.50 D-26 8" x 8" x 8" Tapping Tee 1 Each $1,067.08 $1,067.08 $1,415.80 $1,415.80 D-27 8"Tapping Valve 2 Each $4,580.45 $9,160.90 $1,544.60 $3,089.20 D-28 Remove Existing 8' AC Waterline Including Valves and Fittings, and Dispose of Properly Meeting City, State and Federal Requirements 171 L.F. $24.63 $4,211.73 $19.30 $3,300.30 D-29 Remove Existing 6" AC Waterline Including Valves and Fittings, and Dispose of Properly Meeting City, S e and Federal Requirements 105 L.F. $24.63 $2,586.15 $19.30 $2,026.50 m TOTAL PART "D" - WATER - ITEMS (D1 -D29) $219,263.15 $226,609.30 cO1QAL BASE BID (PARTS A, B, C, D) O $1,196,231.77 $1,411,453.80 O Page 9 of 10 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION GARRETT CONST. CO. $1,411,453.80 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. P.O. Box 1028 16,975.00 ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET 3734 F.M. 3006 Ingleside, TX 78362 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 6138 Pleasanton, TX 78064 30,320.00 ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PART E - ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID NO. 1 2" of Caliche Base (2% Lime) Compacted to 95% Modified Proctor Density (ASTM 1557-91) at 2% of E-1 Optimum Moisture. This work shall Include all labor, equipment, materials and additional excavation required to achieve the lines and grades shown on the construction plans. 8,750 S.Y. $1.94 $16,975.00 $3.00 $26,250.00 PART F - ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID NO.2 1' of Hot-Mixed-Asphaltio-Concrete T.H.D. Type "D". This work shall include all labor, equipment, F-1 materials and additional excavation required to achieve the lines and grades shown on the construction plans. 7,580 S.Y. $2.97 $22,512.60 $4.00 $30,320.00 SUMMARY TOTAL BASE BID (PARTS A, B. C, D) $1,196,231.77 $1,411,453.80 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 16,975.00 26,250.00 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 22,512.60 30,320.00 TOTAL $1,235,719.37 $1,468,023.80 Page 10 of 10 N PROJECT LOCATION County Cemeter ~ark VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY PROJECT NO. 6138 ANNA VILLE STREET IJ/IPROVE/IIENTS VIOLET ROAD TO STARLITE LANE CI'I'Y OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS EXHIBIT "D' CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT ~ DEP~m~TOFENGINEERING SERWC~ PA~E: 1 of 1 ~'-- DATE: 1 I- 11-2002 ~ ORDINANCE CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FOLLOWING HIG~AY IN CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS: Annaville Road from Violet Road to Starlite Lane IMPOSING ASSESSMENTS TOTALING $101,144.31 AGAINST PROPERTY ABUTTING THE IMPROVEMENTS, AFFECTED RAILWAYS, AND PROPERTY AND RAILWAY OWNERS; FIXING CORRESPONDING LIENS ON PROPERTY AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS AND THE CORRESPONDING LIENS AND CHARGES BASED ON AS-BUILT CONDITIONS; SPECIFYING ASSESSMENT PAYMENT TERMS AND LIEN ENFORCEMENT MEASURES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. In its Resolution No.024997, passed on September 9, 2002, the city council determined that it was necessary to improve and ordered the improvement of the following highway in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas: Annaville Road from Violet Road to Starlite Lane (collectively, the "Annaville Road Street Improvements Project") (the "Project"). In that resolution, the city council also noted that street, curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements were to be paid for partly by the city and partly by assessments. Driveway improvements were to be paid for entirely by assessments. On November 26, 1996, the city council passed Resolution No. 022767, which specified rules which apply to the city street improvement assessment process (the "Assessment Process Rules Resolution"). These rules concerned assessment heating notice and the assessment heating itself. In Resolution No. 024998 passed on September 9, 2002, the city council scheduled a public heating on proposed assessments for the Annaville Road Street Improvements Project. The city council directed that hearing notice be published and mailed in accordance with the Assessment Process Rules Resolution. Thereafter, notice was published on the following dates: September 23, 2002, September 30, 2002, and October 7, 2002. Written notice was sent via certified mail to owners of property abutting the proposed improvements, and owners of affected railways, if any, on October 3, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. During the September 9, 2002 city council meeting, a public hearing was held concerning proposed assessments for the Annaville Road Street Improvements Project. The city council considered: written testimony by the city's director of engineering services and a city-retained real estate appraiser. A copy of the appraiser's written testimony is attached as Exhibit A; Bo testimony, if any, by owners of property abutting the proposed improvements and their representatives; C. testimony, if any, by owners of affected railways and their representatives; additional testimony, if any, by the director of engineering services, other members of city staff, and a city-retained real estate appraiser; and E. other testimony and evidence, if any. After consideration of all testimony and other evidence, the assessment hearing is closed. SECTION 2. Proposed assessments for each property abutting proposed improvements and for affected railway property, if any, are listed in Exhibit B. These assessments have been calculated according to the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi (the "Corpus Christi Code") Section 49-2 1 and Texas Transportation Code Chapter 313. The front-foot rule was applied unless that would have resulted in injustice or inequality. In those cases, however, the city council has applied special rates or made other equitable adjustments to the assessments, all considering the: Ao special benefit the property and the owner receive in enhanced value to the property; B. equities of the owners; and adjustment of the apportiomment to produce a substantial equality of benefits received and burdens imposed. SECTION 3. The city council determines that the assessment on each property listed in Exhibit B is just and equitable and does not exceed the special benefit in enhanced value which that property and its owner will receive by construction of the proposed improvements. SECTION 4. The assessments listed in Exhibit B are adopted and fixed as a lien on the property and a personal liability and charge against the property owner. This includes any property which is in the area between, under, or extending two feet outside a railway's tracks, H:~LEG-D1R\j oh n\ORDINANCE~CI ose Pub. Hrg. AnnavJlle Rd.,wpd 2 double tracks, tum outs, or switches. SECTION 5. The director of engineering services or his designee is authorized to adjust these assessments and the corresponding liens and charges without further city council action if it is determined after completion of the proposed improvements that the amount of property actually improved is either greater or less than the amount utilized for purposes of calculating the assessment. Under those circumstances, an adjustment may be made to ensure that the assessment for each property corresponds to as-built conditions. The adjustment will be made using the same assessment method (front-foot rule, special rate, other equitable adjustment) which was used to calculate the assessment listed in Exhibit B. It is intended that these adjustments will not be substantial in nature. Thus, they will not trigger any statutory requirement for the city council to hold a new assessment hearing to impose revised assessments. SECTION 6. These assessments have been imposed after due consideration of all testimony and other evidence. They include any appropriate equitable adjustments. They also reflect the correction of any errors, inaccuracies, or irregularities noted at the public hearing. All protests against or objections to the assessments or to the contract for the improvements, other than as reflected in Exhibit B, are denied. SECTION 7. In accordance with Corpus Christi Code Section 49-21, a property owner may pay an assessment as follows: Any property owner against whom and against whose property an assessment has been imposed may pay the whole assessment, without interest, within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance of the improvements by the city. Altematively, an assessment may be paid in 120 or fewer monthly installments. The first installment will be payable within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance of the improvements by the city. Installments and accrued interest will be due each month thereafter until the assessment is paid. Alternatively, an assessment may be paid in 10 or fewer annual installments. The first installment will be payable within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance of the improvements by the city. One installment and accrued interest will be due each year thereafter until the assessment is paid. SECTION 8. The interest rate on assessments will be the greater off A. eight (8) percent per annum; or the interest rate paid by the city on its most recently issued general obligation bonds. H:~LEG-DIR\j ahn\ORDINANC E~Clos~ Pub. I-kg. Annaville Rd..wpd 3 Assessment installments may be paid at any time before maturity by paying the principal and accrued interest. If a property owner does not timely pay an assessment indebtedness or any part thereof, then the whole indebtedness remaining unpaid will, at the option of the city, immediately mature and become payable without notice, demand, or presentment for payment. SECTION 9. These assessment liens are first and prior liens on the property affected. They are superior to any other lien or claim other than one for county, school district, or municipal ad valorem taxes. The liens date from September 9, 2002, the date when the Corpus Christi City Council ordered the Annaville Road Street Improvements Project. SECTION 10. A lien against property or the personal liability of a property owner that arises from an assessment under this ordinance may be enforced by suit or sale of the property assessed in the manner provided by law for sale of property for municipal ad valorem taxes. Further, the assessments may be collected along with interest, expenses of collection, and reasonable attorneys' fees. SECTION 11. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, to find and declare an emergency because of the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of city affairs, such finding of an emergency is made and declared requiring suspension of the charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ,2002. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM THE ~ DAY OF ~ 2002 JAMES R. BRAY JR., CITY ATTORNEY ~qsistant City Attorney TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas H:~LF~J-D~\john\ORD1NANCE~Close Pub. Hrg, Annavill¢ Rd wpd 4 For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter role as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter role and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Henry Garrett Rex A. Kinnison Bill Kelly John Longoria Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DIR\john\ORDINANCE\Close Pub. Hrg. Annaville Rd..wpd 5 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT ANNAVILLE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM VIOLET ROAD TO STARLITE LANE My name is Angel R. Escobar. I am the City Engineer for the City of Corpus Chdsti and have served in this capacity for the last 26 months and as Assistant City Engineer for the last one hundred twenty months (120) months. I am a Professional Engineer, licensed by the State of Texas since 1977. experience in design of construction and estimating the costs thereof. I have over 24 years of I am familiar with this project, which encompasses: · Annaville Road from Violet Road to Starlite Lane This project consists of construction of 2,530 linear feet of 28-foot back-to-back pavement, sidewalks, driveways and curb and gutter;, 690 linear feet of storm sewer of various diameters; 2,450 linear feet of 8- inch PVC sanitary sewer;, and 2,520 linear feet of 8-inch PVC water line together with ail appurtenances as shown on the plans and called for in the specifications. Limits of the work will be as follows: · Annaville Road from Violet Road to Starlite Lane Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Utilities Commercial Paper Program. Prior to this headng, I had an estimate of project costs prepared, and it compared favorably with the bids received. In my opinion, the costs are true and accurate. This project is estimated to start in December 2002 with completion in September 2003. ('~F-Angel R. Escobar, P.E. Director of Engineering Services EXHIBIT "A" GEORGE N CORPUS CHRISTL I~rxA$ 784~1 · ~=ust 20, 2002 PARASKEVA$ REALTORS PREML1MINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- Annaville Road Street hiiprovements Annaville Road - Violet Road to Starlite Road My name is George N Paraskevas and I am a State Certified R~idenfial appraisex and have been evaluating property and practicing real estate in the Corpus Christi area s'mce 1971. I have e~q~riane~ in aplmdsing both eemm~eial and residanfial prope~es, and I am familiar with the real estate mmket in Caxpus Christi. I am familiar with the Annaville Road Street lmprovemants. I agree with Mr. JeffBarroso's description of the cenditioms to be changed and I am familiar with the improvements to be made by the City of Corpus I have reviewed the project assessment roll; and personally e~amlned each of the 52 parcels of land therein. In my opinion each such parcel will be specifically benefited by each improvement to be assessed against it; without regard to the community benefit. In addition, it is my opinion that each such parcel will be specially enhanced by such improvement at least to the extent of the assessment stated. Thank yen, George N Paraskevas Appraiser OFFIGIE (1~61) 992-=)~41 FAX (:~el) 992-2S42 geoparaOccbor, org www. georgepara8 kevas.com Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annaville Rd. Street Improvements dnnaville Rd - Yiolet Rd. to Starlite Ln. 2O02 Begin Annaville Rd. - No~th Sid~ 01 ~il~,l~Roth 0.0011. Curb, Cmtler, andPavcmcnt-Fmnt ~ $9.75 peril, = $0.0( ¢302 I~oletRd. 119.61 fl. Curb, Gutrcr, andPavcment-Sidc ~ $4.88 pe£fl, -~ $583.70( Corpus Christi, TX 78410 0.00 fl,~ 4 11. Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 i per 11.2 $0.0( ~302 Violet Rd. 398.44 11.2 4 fl, Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 per fl,~ $219.2~ Lot I-A, Block C 250.00 fl,~ 20 ft. Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 per 11) $1215.0( Annaville Addition No. 2 0.0~ tt.2 No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 i per ft.~ $0.0( ~213-0003-0010 0.0~ fl,~ No Extras ~ $0.00 Iper 11.2 $0.0( t-lB 0,0(] fi.: No Extras ~ $0.00 i per fl,z $0.0( $1,997.92 02 Dale Robert Toomes, etux 65.0~ 11. Curb, GuRer, and Pavement- Front ~ $9.75 .crff $633.7: 11138/.nna~lle Rd. 0.0~ 11. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 .er fl, $0.0( Corpus Christi, TX 78410 220.0~ fl,~ 4 ff Wide Sidewalk- Front ~ $1.00 .ertl,~ $220.0( 11138 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ fl,z 4 fi. Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ,er fl,~ $0.0( Lot l-C, Block C 140.0~ fl,~ 10 fl- Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ,er fl.2 $680.4( Anaaville Addition No. 2 0.0~ fl,2 No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ,er fl,~ $0.0( 0213-00030012 0.0~ fl,: No Ex~ras ~ $0.00 er fl,~ $0.0( R-lB 0.0~ fl,~ NoExtras ~ $0.00 crt,~ $0.0( $1,534.18 03 ~nnie]~Byerl~ 65.0( fl, Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Front ~ $9.75 ~rfl, $633.7; 11134 Jnna~lle Rd. 0.0( 11. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~r 11. SO.tx Corpus Christi, TX 78410 188.0( fl,~ 4 fl, Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 crft.~ $1880( I 1114 Aanavile Rd. 0.0( 112 4 fl, Wide Sidewalk- Side ~ $0.50 er ft.* SO.tx Lot2-A, BlockC 228.0( fl,2 18 ff Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~rfl,~ $1108.tx ~.nnaville Addition No. 2 0.0( fl.: No Second Driveway Q $4.86 ~erfl,~ $0.0( ~213-0003-0020 0.0( fl,* NoExisas ~ $0.00! ~rft.~ $0.tx I-lB 0.tx fl,~ No Extras ~ $0.tX) ~er f~.~ $0.0( '0758 Dogwood 0.0( 11. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~er 11. $0.0( tll$0 Annavile Rd. 0.0( fl,z 4 fl, Wide Sidewalk- Side ~ $0.50 ,er 11) SO.tx ~213-0003-0021 0.0( 112 No Extras ~ $0.00 ~er tt.2 SO.tx i-lB 0.0( fl,2 NoExtras ~ $0.00 ~erfl,a SO.tx $1134.15 05 JenevaL. Tschoepe 69.6~ fl, Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Front ~ $9.75 ~erft. $679.21 ~.O. Box1716 0.tx fi. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ,erfl, SO.tx [1126 Annavlle Rd. 0.0( fl,~ 4 11. Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~er fl,* SO.tx Lot 2-C, Block C 140.0( fl,: 10 · Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er 11.~ $680.4~ ~,nnaville Addition No. 2 0.0{ fl,2 No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 er 11.~ SO.tx 1213-0003-0022 0.tx fl,~ No Extras ~ $0.00 ~er fl,2 SO.tx R-lB 0.0( IL~ NoExtras ~ $0.00 ~rfl,z $0.tx $1,598.36 Ill20gnnavilleRd. 0.0( R. Curb, GuOer, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 erR. SO.tX 7orpus Chrisli, TX 78410 460.tX fc2 4 fl, Wide Sidewalk ~ Front ~ $1.00 ~er fl,~ $460.0( 11120 Annavile Rd. 0.0( 117 4ffWideSidewalk-Side ~ $0.50 erft. Lot4, BIoekC 140.0( fl,~ 10 ff Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er11) $680.4( · .nnaville Addition No. 2 0.tx 112 No second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er11.2 $0.0( )213-0003-0040 0.tx 112 NoExtr~ ~ $0.00 ~er11.~ SO.tX R-lB 0.tX fl,z No Extras ~ $0.00 ~er 11.z So.tx $2,359.15 07 EC. Campbell 125.0( fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Front ~ $9.75 ~er Il 120 ~nnaville Rd 0.0( fl, Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ,er 11. $0.0( Corpus Chr~sli, TX 78410 460.tX fl,: 4 fc Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 ,er 11.2 $460.0( Il 110 Annavlle Rd. 0.01 11.2 4 fl, Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~er 11) SO.tx Lot 5, Block C 140.tX fl,: 10 fl, Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er fl,2 $680.4( ~nnaville Addition No. 2 0.tX fl,2 No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er fl,a $0.0( ~213-0O03-O050 O.tX fl,2 NoExtms ~ $0.00 ~erfl,2 So.tx R-lB O.tx 11) No Extras ~ $0.00 ,er 11) SO.tx $2.359.15 EXHIBIT "B" Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annavillo Rd. Street Improvements 2002 08 Celsonl;.Downe~et~ 125.(~ ~. Cmb, Gu~er, and Pavement - Front ~$9.75 ~ ~ $1,21B.7~ Core, ChriS, TX 78410 452.~ ~? 4~WideSid~k-Front ~ ~1.~ ~z ! 11~ Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~ 4 ~ Wide Si~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~ ~ = $0.~ ~t6,~ockC 162.~ fi? 12~Wide~veway ~ ~.86 ~ = $787.3~ Annav~leAddiflonNo. 2 0.~ ff~ No~ndDr~ay ~ ~.86 ~fl? = $0.~ ~213~0~0 0.~ ff~ No Ex~ ~ ~.~ ~ fi? = $0.0( $2,4~.07 09 Ma~ ~. Ben,es and ~clovio ~ 58.~ ff Cu~, ~r, md P~ent - Front ~ $9.75 ~ ~. = $565.5( ~1046~n~lle~. 184.~,ff? 4ffWideSidewMk-Front ~ $1.00 ~ff? = ?o~C~tL TX 78410 0.~ff~ 4K Wid~SidewMk-Sid~ ~ $0.50 mrR? = $0.~ I~ Annavile Rd. 150.~ iff~ 12 · Wide Driv~ay ~.86 ~ = $729.0( ~t 7-A, ~k C 0.~ ~.~ No Se~d D~ay ~ ~.86 ~ fi? = $0.~ 10 ~ R~era 67.~ ~ R. Curb, ~er, ~d P~ement- Front ~ $9.75 ~ fi. = $653.2~ ~o~C~, TX 78410 220.~ R.~ 4KWideSid~k.F~nt ~ $1.~ ~ff? = $220.~ t1042 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ ~z 4 K Wide Sid~k - Side ~ ~.50 ~ ~ = $0.0( knnav~leAddifionNo. 2 0.~ ~? NoSe~nd~iveway ~ ~.86 ~ff? = $0.0( 11 ~tl~EugeneFalentme, et~ 125.~ fl. Cu~,~,~dP~ement-Front ~$9.75 ~R. = $1,218.7~ ?o~Chr~ti, ~ 78410 428.~ fl? 4ffWideSidew~k-Front ~ $1.00 ~rff? = $428.0( ~1030AnnavileRd. 0.~ ~? 4~WideSidew~k-Side ~ $0.50 ~ff? = knnavilleAddifionNo. 2 0.01 fi? NoSe~nd~N~ay ~ ~.68 ~R? = $0.~ ~-IB 0.01 ~? NoEx~ ~ $0.00 ~ff? = $0.0~ $2,754.~ 12 ~il~ Eugene galentme, et ~ 106.8~ ~. Curb, ~aet. ~d P~ement- Fret ~ $9.75 ~ ff. = $1,042.1~ tl030~lle~. 0.0~ ff. Cu~,~,~dPavement-Side ~ $4.88 ~. = $0~ Volt,ti, TX 78410 387.5~ ff~ 4~WideSid~Mk-Fr~t ~ $1.~ mrff.2 = $387.5~ ll030AnnavileRd. 0.~ ff.~ 4~WideSidew~k-Side ~ $0.50 mr~z = $0.~ knnavflleAdditionNo. 2 0.01 ~.~ No~d~way ~ $4.68 ~? = ~-IB 00~ fi? No Exam ~ $0.00 ~? = $0.0{ $2,110.14 12~rro~Dr. 0.~ ff Curb,~aer,~dP~ement-Side ~ $4.88 ~ff. = ~.~ ~er~tlle, TX 78028 335.5~ ff.~ 4KWideSidew~k-Front ~ $1.00 ~fl? = $335.5~ tnnav~le Addition No. 2 0.~ ff.~ NoSe~nd~v~ay ~ ~.86 ~er~~ = $0.~ }213-0003~110 0.~ fl? NoEx~ ~ $0.00 ~ = $0.0( $2,75].02 14 ~r~ ~ ~it~ 106.8~ ~. Curb, ~r~ ~d Pavement- F~nt ~ $9.75 ~ Eer~tlle, TX 78028 275.56 ~? 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.00 ~ R.2 = $275.5~ 11020 Annavile Rd. 0.00 ~? 4 ~ Wide Sid~k - Side ~ ~.50 ~er Lot 11, ~ock C 261.00 fl? 21 ff Wide ~veway ~.68 ~R? = $1,268.4~ ~nnaville Addition No. 2 217.00 ~? 17 ff Wid~ ~veway ~ ~.68 ~ fl? = $1,054.62 $3,640.82 Page 2 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annaville Rd. Street Improvements Revised 2002 15 :..P~Kocurel~etuxand.41fonsoPena, 0.0( iL Curb, Gulter, andPavcmcnt-Front ~$9.75 ~erfl. ~tux 106.$ ti. Curb, Gulter, and Pav©mcnt- Side ~$4.88 ~erfi. -- $521.62 ~lO02AnnavilleRd 0.0( fL2 4iLWideSidcwalk-Front ~ $1.00 ~erti.: = $0.~ 7orpus Christi, TX 78410 383.5t ti.z 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~er ft.a $191.78 ~301 Leonard Dr. 151.0( ti? 11 iL Wide Driveway (~ $4.86 ~er fL2 $733.86 ~ot 12-A, Block C 0.0( iLz No Sccond Driveway ~ $4.86 )er fl.~ $0.00 lalph Leonard 0.0( iL2 No Extras ~ $0.00 ~cr fi.: $0.0~ 1360-0012-0010 0.0~ ti? No Extras ' ~ $0.00 ~er ft.~ = I-lB $1,447.26 16 ~larcus [E Long 69.6( ti. Curb, Gutler, and Pavement - Front ~$9.75 ~crft. = $678.6C f$O2ClearForkDr. 0.0~ iL Curb, GuPgr, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~eriL = $0.0C ;orpu~Christi, TX 78410 238.44 ti.: 4~WideSidewalk~Front ~ $1.00 ~erft.: = $238.4(3 10922 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ fL2 4 iL Wide Sidewalk- Side ~ $0.50 ~er ti? = $0.0~ Lot2-R, BIockE 140.(~ ft.~ 10 iL Wide Driveway (~ $4.86 ~erfL2 = $680.4~ gllisPlace 0.0~ ti.: No Second Drivcway ~ $4.86 ~crft? = $0.0(3 .~313-0000-0020 0.04 ft? No Exffas ~ $0.00 ~er ti.z = $0.0(3 ~-IB 0.00 iL: No Exlras @ $0.00 )ct fl? = $0.0~ $1,597.40 17 liarcus ~ £ong 69.70 iL Curb, GuUer, and Pavement- Front @ $9.75 ~er ft. = $679.5fi 1502 Clear Fork Dr. 0.00 iL Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~er fL = $0.0(J ?orpusChristi, T~ 78410 230.80ii.: 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 JcrfLz = $230.8(3 10930 Annavile Rd. 0.00 fc~ 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~crft? = $0.0C LotI-R, BlockE 162.00 fLz 12 fL Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 Jerti? = $78732 Ellis Place 0.00 ft? No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 Jet ft.z = $0.0( ~313~000-0020 0.00 fL: No Ex,as ~ $0.00 ~er ft? = $0.0C R-lB 0.00 ft? No Exlras @ $0.00 )er ft? = $0.0~ $1,697.70 18 Kevin Peel, et ux 70.00 ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front ~ $9.75 )et iL = $682.5C ~514D~yerDr. 0.00 iL Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 per ft. = $0.0C ~orpus Christi, TX 78410 232.00 ft.~ 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 )er fL: = $232.0C 10918 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ f~.: 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 )er ft.: = $0.0( W/2 of Lot 14, Block E 147.0~ ft.~ ~2 iL Wide Dtiveway ~ $4.86 ~erfL2 = $714.42 Annaville Addition No. 2 0.0~ ti.: No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er ft? = $0.0( ~213-0005-0140 0.0~ ft? No Ex~ras ~ $0.00 per ft.: = $0~0C R-lB 0.0~ ft.z NoExtras ~ $0.00 )crft? = $0.0C $1,628.92 19 Emily ~ Castillo 70.0~ ft. Curb, Gutter, and pavement- Front ~ $9.75 per iL = $682.5C 10912 /.nna~lle Rd 0.0~ ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~criL = $0.0( Corpus Christi, TX 78410 232.0(3 ft.: 4iL Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 ~eriL~ = $232.0( 10912 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ iL: 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~er iL2 ~ $0.0( E/2ofLol 14, BIockE 147.0~ ft? 12 iL Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 per ti? = $714.4~ Annav01e Addition No. 2 0.0~ iLa No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 per iL2 = $0.0( 8213-0005-0145 0.0~ ft.: No Extras ~ $0.00 per ti.z = $0.0( R-lB 0.0~ iL: No Exffas ~ $0.00 per it.: = $0.0( $1,628.92 20 RubenOrOz 140.0~ ii. Curb, Guttcr, and Pavcment- Front ~ $9.75 peril = $1,365.0( 10906 Annaville Rd 0.0~ ii. Curb, Gutter, andPavemcnt-Sidc ~ $4.88 peril. = $0.0( Corpus Christi, TX 78410 512.0~ ~ 4iL WidcSidcwalk-Front ~ $1.00 per ft? = $512.0( 10906 Annavile Rd. 0.0( ft? 4 ti. Wide Sidewalk- Side ~ $0.50 per ft.: = $0.0( Lot 15, Block E 162.0( ft? 12 ii. Wide Driveway ~ $4.68 per ft? = $787.3J Annaville Addition No. 2 O.C~ R? No Second Driveway ~ $468 per ft.: = $0.0( 021~-0005-0150 0.0( ft.: No Exffas ~ $0.00 per ft.z = $0.0( R-lB 0.0( ft.~ No Exlra~ ~ $0.00 per ft.: = $0.0( $2,664.32 21 ~C.$eeds 140.0( iL Curb, Gut~er, andPavcmcnt-Front ~ $9.75 per fL = $1,365.0( '210 Barton 0.0( fl. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 pet fL = $0.0( ?arpusChr~sti, TX 78418 456.0( fL~ 4iL WidcSidewalk- Front ~ $1.00 per ft? = $456.0( 0900 Annavile Rd. 0.0( ti.z 4 iL Wide Sidewalk ~ Side ~ $0.50 per ft? = $0.0( .or 16, BIockE 167.0( fl? 13 iLWidcDrivcway ~ $4.68 perft? = $811.6~ ~nnavilleAdditionNo. 2 173.0( ft? 13 fL Wide Driveway ~ $4.68 perfLz = $839.05 ~213-000~0160 0.0( ft? NoEx~-as ~ $0.00 pcrfL I-lB 0.0( fl? No l~x~ras ~ $0.00 per iL: = $0~0£ $3,471.67 Page 3 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annaville Rd. Street lmprovemeats '0828~11e~. 0.~ CU~, ~r, ~d P~cnt- Side $4.Bg ~r~ $0.~ 7orpus ChrBti, TX 78410 236.~ fl? 4 ff Wide Sidew~k- Fret ~ $1.~ ~ fl? $236.0( 0828 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~? 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~ ~? $0.0C ~t 1%~ Bilk E 151.C ~? 11 ff Wide ~vcway ~ ~.86 ~ ~.~ $733.8~ knnaville Addition No, 2 0.~ fi? No ~d ~eway ~ ~.86 ~ ~? ~.~ ~213-0~5~175 0.~ ~ No ~ ~ $0.00 ~r ~ $0.0C $1,657.36 23 ~ Fg~I Pro~r~ 70.~ fl. Cu~, ~r, ~d P~cmcnt- Front ~ $9.75 ~ fi. $682.5C ~o Cl~or~ars~ ~ser 0.~ fl. C~, ~r, ~d P~ement- Side ~ $4.88 ~r ~. $0.~ '~22~1~ Ro~ 196.~ fl? 4 ~ Wide Sid~k- Front ~ $1.~ ~ ~ $196.0C ?o~ ~r~ti, ~ 78410 0.~ ~ 4 · Wide Sid~alk - Side ~ $0.50 ~r fi? $0.~ ~0822 Annavile Rd. 151.~ fl? I 1 ff Wide ~veway ~ ~.86 ~ R? $733.8~ ~ot 17-A, ~ock E 1~.~ fl? 10 · Wide ~ivcway ~ $4.86 ~r ~? $880.4~ knnavilleAddifion No. 2 0.0( ~z No Ex~ ~ $0.~ ~ ~? ~21~170 0.~ fl? No Ex~ ~ $0.~ ~ fl? .= $0.~ I-lB $2,492.76 24 ~ich~dL. Smi~et~ 60.0~ifl. C~b,~r,~dPavemcnt-Fr~t ~ $9.75 ,~. $585.8~ ~1002 U~ber~ 0.~I~' Cu~, ~r, ~d P~cmcnt- Side ~ ~.88 ~ fi. $0.~ ~o~ Chr~tt, ~ 78410 192.3t ~.~ 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k- Front ~ $1.~ ~ ~? $192.36 t0812 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ ~? 4 ~ Wi~ Sid~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~ ~? $0.~ Fra~ ~ Bilk g 162.0~ ~ 12 ~ Wide Driveway ~ ~.86 ~ ~? $787.3~ knnavflle Addition No. 2 0.0~ ~.~ No Se~nd Driv~ay ~ ~.86 ~ ~? $0.0~ )21~005~1~ 0.~ ~ NoEx~ ~ $0.00 ~fi? $0.0~ ~-IB 0.~ R.: NoEx~ ~ $0.~ ~? $0.0G $1,565.56 25 ~ohnnle Oglesby ~.0~ ~. Curb, ~, ~d P~ent- Fret ~ $9.75 ~ ~. $585.8~ ~o~Oglesby, Jr. 0.~ · Curb,~r,~dP~cment-Side ~ $4.88 ~R. $0.0~ ~0810 ~ille ~ 192.3~ ~: 4 ~ Wide Sidcw~k - Front ~ $1.~ ~r R? $192.36 ?orp~C~a, TX 78410 0.~ ~: 4~WideSid~k-Side ~ $0.50 ~R? $0.0~ 10810 Annavile Rd. 162.~ ~: 12~WidcDrivcway ~ $4.86 ~er~.~ $787.32 Fract ~ Bl~k E 0.~ ~: No Se~nd D~veway ~ $4.86 ~ ~? $0.0~ R-lB $1~65.56 ?o~ C~ti. TX 78410 O.0~ ~.~ 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.00 ~ fi.~ $0.0~ I~1 Staflite Ln. 639.61 ~.z 4 fi. Wide Sidcw~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~ ~? $319.8~ Fra~J, BIockE 0.0~ ~ NoDriveway ~ $4.86 ~fi.~ $0.~ ~nnav~leAddifionNo. 2 0.0~ fi.z No~d~veway ~ $4.86 ~R? ~.~ 27 4llen&He~ickPropertieslnc. 0.0~ ~. Cu~,~r,~dP~t-Front ~ $9.75 ~ ~.0~ o.O. BoxlO140 1~.5~ fl. C~b,~r,~dP~ent-Sidc ~ ~.88 ~rfi. $519.72 ?orpus C~eti, TX 78460 0.~ fi.: 4 ~ Wide Sidcw~k - Front ~ $1.~ ~r ~? $0.~ 1249StaditeLn. 386.~ fl.z 4~WideSid~k-Side ~ $0.50 ~? $193.~ ~t 21-K Block D 140.~ ~ l0 · Wide ~veway ~ $4.86 ~r ~? ~80.40 ~nnaville Addition No. 2 0.0~ ~: No Se~nd Dr~eway ~ $4.86 ~cr ~? $0.~ )213~004~218 0.~ ~ NoExU~ ~ $0.~ ~? $0.~ $1~93.I2 28 41~D. Ha~alik I~.~ Curb,~r,~dP~ement-Front ~$9.75 ~rR. $975.~ 10809~ille~. 0.~ Curb, ~er, ~d Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~er~. $0.~ ~orpus ~r~ti, ~ 78410 296.~ ~: 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.~ ~ R? $296.~ 10809 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~ 4 · Wide Sidew~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~r fi.: $0.~ ~t 9, ~ock 2 162.~ ~: 12 · Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er ~? $787.32 Ha~er Addition 184.00 ~.~ 14 · Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er~? $894.24 ~148~2-0090 0.~ ~? No ~ ~ $0.00 ~er fi? $0.~ R-lB 0.00~z No Ex~ ~.0O erR? $0.00 $2,952.~ Page 4 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annaville Rd. Street Improvements 2OO2 29 HughL&BCagle l~.~[ C~,~,mdP~t-Front ~ $9.75[~rfi. $975.~ Robstown, TX 78380 352.~ [z 4 · Wi~ Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.~ er ~z = $352.~ 10821 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~? 4 [ Wide Sid~k - Side ~ ~.50 er ~2 $0.~ ~tS, BIock2 162.~ [~ 12 ~ Wide Driveway ~ ~.86 er~? $787.3; Haigler Addition 0.~ fl? No Se~nd ~eway ~ M.86 er fl? = $0.0( ~14~02-0080 0.0( fl.z No Ex~ ~ ~.00 er ~ = $0.~ ~0 ~m~do Go~lez, et ~ 1~.~ ~. Curb, ~r, ~d P~ement- Front ~ $9.75 ,er fl. $975.0( Route 3, Box ~07-D 0.~ · Curb, ~r, ~d P~ement- Side ~ $4.88 ,er fl. $0.0( Co~ Chr~ti, TX 78410 ~.~ ff~ 4 · Wide Sidew~k - Fret ~ $1.~ ~ fl? ~00.0( 10829 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~ 4 ~. Wide Sid~k - Side ~ $0.50 ,er ~.~ ~t 7, ~ock 2 0.~ fl.z No Driveway ~ $4.86 ,er ~.~ $0.~ Haigler Addition 0.~ fl? No Se~nd ~iv~ay ~ $4.86 ,~ fl? $0.~ $1J75.00 12109H~m~. 0.0( · Curb,~r,~dP~ement-Side ~ $4.88 ~. $0.0( Haigler Addition 0.~ ~ No Sc~nd D~eway ~ ~.861 ~r K~ ~.0( 314~0002-~0 0.~ ~ NoEx~ ~ $0.00~ ~ $0.0( I $2,015.40 32 ~a~in ~ Pa~ick 85.0( fi. C~b, ~r, ~d P~emcnt - Front ~ $9.75 ~ K $828.7~ f451Go~ihar~. 0.~ ~. Curb, ~R~, ~d Pavement- Side ~ ~.88 ,~ $0.~ tO845AnnavileRd. 0.~ ~? 4~ WideSid~alk-Side ~ $0.50 ~erfi? $0.0( ~t 5, ~ock 2 0.~ fi.~ No ~iveway ~ $4.86 ~cr ~? $0.0( ]aiglerAddifion 00( ~.~ NoSc~nd~eway ~ $4.86 ~rfl? $0.0( ~14~0002-0050 0.~ fl.~ NoEx~ ~ $0.~ ~cr~.= $0.0( ~-I 0.0( ~? NoEx~ ~ $0.~ ~rfl? $0.0( $1,168.75 ~451 Go~ihar ~. 0.~ fl. Cu~, ~er, ~d P~ement- Side ~ $4.88 ~r fl. $0.~ ~orpus C~ti, TX 78411 340.~ ~? 4 · Wide Sidcw~k - Front ~ $1.00 ~ fi.= $340.~ [0855 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~.= 4 ff Wide Sidcw~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~ ~.~ $0.~ ~aig~r Addition 0.~ ~ No Sc~nd ~iveway ~ M.86 ~ ~.~ $0.~ H48-0~2-0040 0.~ ~ No Ex~ ~ ' $0.00 ~ R.~ $0.~ $1,168.75 34 ~l~i~mo~Costley 1~.~ fi. Curb,~r,~dP~cment-Front ~ $9.75 ~er~. $975.~ ~0913~lle~. 0.~ fl. Curb,~r,~dPav~cnt-Side ~ $4.88 ~rfl. $0.0~ ?or~ ~ti, TX 78410 320.~ ~? 4 · Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.~ ~er fl.~ $320.~ H4~002~030 0.~ ~.~ NoEx~ ~ $0.00 ~r~.~ $0.01 $2,510.00 ~.0. B~10486 161.50fl ~,~,~dPavcmcnt-Side ~ $4.88 )~R. $788.12 ~orpus Chr~ti, TX 78410 0.~ ~? 4 · Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.~ )~ E? $0.~ 4~2 ~ona~ Dr. 6~.~ fi.: 4 · Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 )er fi? $323.~ Lot i-A, ~ock 2 0.~fi? No Driwway ~ $4.86 ~? ~.00 Haigler Addition 0.~.= No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~rfi? $0.00 ~i48-~2~010 0.~ R? NoEx~ ~ $0.00 )ertl? $0.0~ R-lB 0.~ fi? NoEx~~ $0.00 )er~.~ $0.0~ Page 5 Preliminary Assessment Roll -Annaville Rd. Street Improvements 2002 ~ Am~t 36 Cha~',~s SAeppard, ~. 0.~ fl. C~, ~, ~d P~cmcnt- Front ~ $9.75 ~ R. $0.~ Corp~ C~ti, TX 78410 0.~ fl? ' 4 · Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.00 ~ ~2 $0.~ 4241 ~ona~ Dr. 296.8( ~a 4 · Wide Sid~k- Side ~ ~.50 ,er ~? $148.~ ~t l-A, ~ock I 150.~ ff~ 12 · Wide ~iveway ~ ~.86 ~r R? $729.~ Ha~ler Addition 0.~ fl.2 No Se~d ~cway ~ ~.86 ,er ~2 $0.~ M~001~Ol0 0.~ fl? NoEx~ ~ $0.~ ~r~? $0.~ R-lB 0.~ ~.~ ~o Ex~ ~ $0.00 ~ fl? $0.~ $1,298.~ 37 FirgelE. a~by~bos 80.~ fl. Curb,~r,~dP~nt-Fmnt ~ $9.75~ ~fl. $780.~ ~o Martin and ~ ~l~eal 0.~ fl. Curb, ~r, ~d P~cnt- Side ~ ~.88 ~ ~. $0.0~ 11641 ~1~ Creek Dr. 272.~ ~? 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.00] ~ fl? $2~.~ Co~ ~r~tt, ~ 78410-3759 0.0( ~? 4 ~ Wide Sid~ - Side ~ $0.50: ~ ~.a $0.~ 110~ Annavile Rd. 162.~ ~? 12 · Wide Driveway ~ ~.86 ,~ ~.~ $787.32 ~t~,~kl 0.~ ~? NoSe~nd~eway ~$4.86 ~ $0.~ Ha~ler Addition 0.~ ~.~ No Ex~ ~ $0.~ p~ ~.~ $0.0~ R-lB $1,839.~2 38 CarlosC~,~.,et~ 80.~ R. Cu~,~,~dP~ement-Front ~ $9.75 ,erR. $780.0~ 11015 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~ 4 · Wi~ Sid~Mk - Side ~ $0.50 ~r ~ $0.~ ~t4, Bl~kl 92.~ ~ 7~Po~i~ofl4kWideDriveway ~ $4.86 ~rR? $447.12 HaiglerAddifion 0.~ ~? NoS~d~cway ~ ~.86 ~R? $0.0~ R-I B 0.~ ~9 CarlosC~pa,~.,et~ 80.~ R. C~,~,~dPavement-Front ~ $9.75 ~ff $780.~ ?orp~ Chr~ti, TX 78410 292.0~ ~ 4 · Wide Sidew~k - Front ~ $1.00 ~r R.~ $292.0~ 1021 Annavile Rd. 0.~ R.~ 4 ~. Wide Sidew~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~ fl? $0.0~ ~ts,~kl 92.~ fl.~ 7~.Ponionofl4~Wide~iveway ~ ~.86 ~er~.~ $447.12 laigler Addition 0.01 ~.~ No Se~nd Dr~eway ~ ~.86 ~ ~.~ $0.~ ~or~r~t~ TX 78410 420.~ R.~ 4~WideSi~w~k-Front $1.00 ~rR.z ~20.0~ t1025 Annavile Rd. 0.~ fl.z 4 ~ Wide Sidew~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~r R? $0.0~ Lot 9, ~k D 206.~ ~.~ 16 ~ Wide ~iveway ~ $4.86 *er ~ $1,001.16 ~nnaville Addition No. 2 0.~ ~.~ No Se~d Dr~eway ~ ~.86 ~r R? = $0.0~ ~-IB 0.00 ~.z No Ex~ ~ $0.00 ~r~~ $0.0~ $2,600.91 rlO~5~lle~. 0.00 R. Cu~, ~, ~d Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~. $0.0~ 7or~r~ti, TX 78410 432.~ ~? 4 ~ Wi~ Sidew~k- Front 11035 Annavi~ Rd. 0.~ ~ 4 · Wide Sid~k - Side ~ $0.50 )~ fl.~ $0.~ ~t 8, ~ock D 173.~ ~ 13 ~ Wide ~iveway ~ M.86 )~ ~.z $840.7~ }213~00~80 0.~ $2,452.53 42 ~ougl~Liber~,Yr.,et~ 121.~. Cu~,~aer,~dP~ement-F~nt ~$9.75 ~ $1,179.75 7a~Chr~ti, T~ 78460-0103 420.~? 4~WideSidew~k-Front $1.00 ~R? $420.~ 11041Annavile Rd. 0.~~ 4 k Wide Sidew~k- Side ~ $0.50 ~R? $0.~ ~t 7, Block D 2~.~ ~nnavilleAddi~onNo. 2 0.~ R? NoSe~ndDrivcway ~ ~.86 ~R? $0.~ $2,600.91 Page 6 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annaville Rd. Street Improvements Revised At 2002 II 43 Harold Bracey 60.5( ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Front ~ S9.75 } ,er iL $589.88 lllOIAnna~lleRd. 0.0( tL Curb, Gutter, andPavemcnt-Sidc ~ $4.88 ~riL $0.00 Corpu~Christi, TX 78410 194.0( iL: 4iLWidcSidewalk-Front ~ $1.00 ~criL: $194.00 11 I01 Annavile Rd. 0.0( iL2 4 ff Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~er ft.: $0.00 SE/2 of Lot 6, BlockD 147.0( ft.: 12 iL Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~riL: $714.42 Annaville Addition No. 2 0.0( fl? No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~r IL: $0.00 0213-0004-0065 0.0( ft? NoExtiaa ~ $0.00 ~:riL: $0.00 R-lB 0.0( ft? NoExtras ~ $0.00 n~riL~ $0.00 $1,498.30 44 Minnte L. and EwaM E. Eick~lberg 60.5( ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Front ~ $9.75 ~er IL $589.88 ll03AnnavilleRd. 0.0( IL Curb, Guner, andPavemcnt-Sidc ~ $4.88 ~eriL $0.00 ?orpusChristi, TX 78410 202.0( ft.: 4iLWidcSidewalk-Front ~ $1.00 ~eriL: $202.00 1103 Annavile Rd. 0.0( IL: 4 f. Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~er IL: $0.00 qW/2ofLot6, BloekD 125.0( IL~ 10iLWidcDrivcway ~ $4.86 ~eriL: $607.50 knnaviHe Addition No. 2 0.0( ILz No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er IL: $0.00 ~213-0004-0060 0.0( ft? NoExtras ~ $0.00 ~eriL: $0.00 ~[-IB 0.0( ft.: NoExC'as ~$000 ~crft? $0.00 $1,399,38 45 ~aymondlKMtmson, etux 60.5(iL Curb, Guttcr, and Pavcmcnt- Front ~ $9.75 ~eriL $589.88 ~ll05AnnavilleRd. O.0(]iL Curb, Guaer, and Pavemem- Side ~ $4.88 ~etiL $0.00 ~orlms Christi, TT( 78410 130.0{ IL: 4 iL Wide Sidewalk - Front ~ $1.00 )er ILa $130.00 ~1105 Annavile Rd. 0.0~ fl.: 4 l~ Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 ~cr ILa $0.0~ g/2 of Lot 5, Block D 140.0~ f? 10 iL Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er ft.: $680.40 ~nnaville Addition No. 2 201.01 f? 18 fl. Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 )er ft? $976.86 )213-0004-0055 0.0~ f? No Extras ~ $0.00 )er IL~ $0.00 R-lB 0.0~ iL: No Extras $2,247.14 46 ~ndrew ~ Malik, et ux 60.5{ ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - Front ~ $9,75 ~er ft. $589.8g lll07AnnavilleRd. 0.00ft. Curb, Gutter, andPavement-Side ~ $4~88 ~erft. $0.00 ~orpusChristi, TX 78410 202.00IL: 4 iL Wide Sidewalk- Front ~ $1.00 }eriLz = $202.00 [ll07AnnavileRd. 0.00ft? 4RWideSidewalk-Side ~ $0.50 ~er~? = $0.00 W/2 of Lot 5, Block D 140.00 IL: 10 IL Wide Driveway ~ $4.86 ~er ft? = $680.4~ S~.nnaville Addition No. 2 0.00 iL: No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~eriLa = $0.00 ~213-0004-0050 0.00 ft.: No ExUas ~ $0.00 )er IL~ = $0.0~ R-lB 0.00 ft.: No Extras ~ $0.00 ~er IL: = $0.0~ $1,472.28 47 Peter L. Latka, et ux 121.00 IL Curb, Gutrer, and Pavement - Front ~ $9.75 ~cr IL = $1,179.75 llll9dnnavilleRd 0.00 ft. Curb, Guaer, and Pavement- Side @$4.88 ~eriL = $0.0~ ~orpusChHsti, TX 78410 432.00 ft.: 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Front ! ~ $1.00 ~riL: = $432.0(3 11119 Annavlle Rd. 0.00 iL: 4 l~ Wide Sidewalk - Side I @ $0.50 ~er ft.: = $0.0~ Lot 4, Block D 173.00 iL: 13 ~- Wide Driveway @$4.86 ~eriL: = $840.7~ Annaville Addition No. 2 000 ft.: No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 ~crft.: = $0.0C ~213-0004-0040 0.00 ft.: No Extras ~ $0.00 ~cr IL: = $0.0~ R-lB O.0G ft.: NoExiras ~ $0.00 ~eriL: = $0.0~ $2,452.53 48 G.D. Fout 78.1~ iL Curb, Guaer, and Pavement - Front @ $9.75 ~erft. = $761.4~ 11125 dnnaville Rd. 0.0~ iL Curb, Guaer, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 ~er IL = $0.0~ Corpus Christi, TX 78410 252.4C iL: 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk- Front ~ $1.00 periLs = $252.4C ll125AnnavileRd. 0.0~ ft.: 4iL Wide Sidewalk- Side ~ $0.50 peril: = $0.0£ Lot3-E, BlockD 195.0~ IL: 15iLWidcDtivcway ~ $4.86 peril~ = $947.7£ Annaville Addition No. 2 0.0C ft.: No Second Driveway ~ $4.86 per fl.: = $0.0C 0213-0004~038 0,0~ ft.: No Extras R-lB 0.{K ils No Extras ~ $0.00 per ft.: = $0,0£ $1,961.57 49 )anielL. McDonald 78.1C ft. Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Front ~ $9.75 periL = $761.45 1006 RJchwood Circle 0.0( IL Curb, Gutter, and Pavement- Side ~ $4.88 per IL = $0.0{ ?orpusChristi, TX 78410 224.4( ftz 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk- Front ~ $1.00 perR? = $224.4( [1127 Annavlle Rd. 0.0( fl? 4 ft. Wide Sidewalk - Side ~ $0.50 per IL: = $0.0{ ~ot3-D, BIockD 140.0( ft.: 10iL WideDrivcway ~ $4.86 peril: = $677.6( knnaville Addition No. 2 162.0( iL: 12IL WidcDrivcway ~ $4.86 pert? = $787.3~ ~213-0004-0036 0.0( iL2 NoExtras ~ $0.00 periL: = $0.0£ t-lB 0,0( IL: No Extras ~ $0,00 per IL~ = $0.0£ $2,450,79 Page 7 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Annaville Rd, Street Improvements 50 WillardCan~obell, etu~ 78.1C ~. C~b,~r,~dP~ent-Front ~ $9.75 ~. $761.4~ Corpus C~ti, TX 78410 2~.~ ~.: 4 · Wi~ Sid~k - Fret ~ $1.00 ~ ~? $2~.~ 11141 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~? 4 ~ Wide Sidcw~k - Side ~ $0.50 ~cr ~? ~.~ ~t ~C, ~k D 162.~ ~ 12 · Wide ~ivcway ~ $4.86 ~ ~.~ $787.3~ Annaville Addition No. 2 0.~ ff.~ No Se~nd ~Ncway ~ $4.86 ~ ~ fl.~ $0.~ ~21~004-00~ 0.~ ffz No Exff~ ~ $0.~ ~r ~.: $0.~ 51 Bl~c~ B. Goss 78.1~ · Cu~, ~r, ~d P~ement - Front ~ $9.75 ~ ~. $761 A7 1015 Forest Trail 0.~ R. Cu~,~r,~dP~cmcnt-Side ~ ~.88 ~ff ~.~ ~ Br~fels, TX 78132 192.~ R.~ 4 · Wide Sid~$k - Front ~ $1.~ ~r fl? $192.~ ~t ~ Bilk D 3~.~ ~? 30 · Wide ~veway ~ $4.86 ~ ~? $1,799.~ Annavitie Addition No. 2 0.~ fl.~ No Sc~nd Driveway ~21~004-~32 0.~ ~? No Ex~ $2,753.47 52 Ma~o~ E Garc~ 72.7{ ~. Curb, ~r, ~d P~cm~t - Front ~ $9.75 ~r fl. $708.8: Co~ ~Ba, TX 78410 2~.8( ~.~ 4 · Wide Sid~k - Front ~ $1.~ ~ ~.: $2~.84 11157 Annavile Rd. 0.~ ~.= 4 ff Wide Si~- Side Annav~le Addition No. 2 0.~ ~ No S~nd ~iveway ~ ~.86 ~ ~.~ ~.~ 021~0004-~30 0.~ fi: NoExg~ ~ $0.00 ~.~ $0.~ R-lB 0.~ R.: NoExff~ ~ $0.00 ~er~.~ $0.~ $~9.6~ End ~a~lle Rd. - South Side Page 8 21 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION AGENDA ITEM: Presentation to Dr. Richard Davis for 20 years service to the City of Corpus Christi as the Medical Director for the Corpus Christi Fire Department. STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position Department 1. J. J. Adame 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name Fire Chief Title/Position Fire Dept. Organization ISSUE: Dr. Richard Davis retired earlier this year after serving as the Medical Director for the Corpus Christi Fire Department for 20 years. BACKGROUND: Until his retirement, Dr. Richard Davis had served as the only Medical Director in the history of the Corpus Christi Fire Department. Dr. Davis was instrumental in the development of the EMS program for the City. He played an intrigal role in the transition from a Basic Life Support Service (bandaging and splinting, and transport) to a fully functional Advanced Life Support Service. This included the training of paramedics, development of medical protocol, and selection and acquistion of equipment. Once the medic unit program was established and operational, Dr. Davis also recognized the benefit to the patients being served by enhancing response times, and recommended that consideration be given to placement of medical supplies, equipment, and paramedics on the City's fire tracks. The result is that Corpus Christi has the distinction of being one of the very first cities in the Texas to begin placing Automatic External Defibrillators on fire apparatus. Actually, the City was one of the first in the Nation to place the AED on all apparatus within the City. The true benefactor of all of Dr. Davis' efforts on behalf of the City's EMS operations are the citizens and the patients who have found themselves in a situation requiring the rapid response of well trained and well equipped paramedics and emergency medical technicians. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council join with the City Manager and the Corpus Christi Fire Department in recognition of the efforts of Dr. Richard Davis and express our appreciation for his outstanding service to our community. Ada~ef'- ~' 22 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION AGENDA ITEM: (Caption/Title of Presentation as it should appear on the agenda) Presentation by Jerry Kane, Chairman of the Airport Board, on the new Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Opening Ceremony. STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Jorge Cruz Aedo 2. Dave Hamrick Title/Position Assistant City Manager Director Department Admin. Services Aviation Services OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Jerry Kane TiflelPosition Chairman Organization Airport Board ISSUE: Announcement of the Opening Ceremony for the new CClA terminal, November 1, 2002. Director, Aviation Services Additional Background [] Exhibits [] 23 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION DATE: October 11, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of the City of Corpus Christi Housing and Community Development, Code Enforcement Division, Substandard Structure Process. CITY STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title Dep'dDiv Margie C. Rose Assistant City Manager ACM-Development Services ISSUE: Present the City Council with the City's Code Enforcement Substandard Structure Process. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: No Council action is required. Margie C. Rose Assistant City Manager CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION PURPOSE THIS PRESENTATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO ADDRESS CONCERNS RAISED ABOUT Substandard Structures related to: • Board Ups • Demolition IN AN EFFORT TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS RAISED. WE WILL PRESENT THE FOLLOWING: • Process for Board -up of structures • Process for Renovation or Demolition of structures • Funding • Conclusion PROCESS FOR BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code, the City has the authority to protect the HEALTH, LIFE, PROPERTY, AND SECURITY OF ITS INHABITANTS The City's Code of Ordinances Section 1344 (c) States: If a building, premises or property is unoccupied, vacant or otherwise uninhabited by humans, but which is otherwise open and may be entered by derelicts, vagrants or children, the official shall have the same power of inspection as aforementioned, including the right of inspection without requesting permission of the owner or other person in charge, and if found to be in violation of this code, may placard it so as to prevent any occupancy of the building, premises or property for human use or habitation, or any other use. PROPERTIES THAT NEED TO BE SECURED ARE IDENTIFIED BY: • Citizen Complaints • Property Advisor Field Inspections • Reports received by Directed Patrol Officers Once identified by the Property Advisor and determined that the properties should be boarded up, one of the following actions is taken: Code Enforcement requests outside contractors to bid on the property that needs to be boarded up. Once a contractor is selected, the property is boarded up. The length of time to board up property is two days. • If vagrants tear the boards off, we request the contractor return to rem board for an additional charge. The length of time to re-board is two days. • If the structure that needs to be boarded up has criminal activity involved, the Supervision and Community Corrections Department boards up the house. The only cost associated is the purchase of the plywood. The length of time to board up is three days. Process for Renovation/Demolition of Structures Once each structure has been boarded up, the Code Enforcement Division initiates a substandard building case in an effort to get the owner to make the necessary repairs. During this process, Code Enforcement takes the following steps: • Submits to the Property Owner a certified letter informing them that their property is in violation of a city ordinance. •The property owner has 30 days to contact Code Enforcement and to repair the structure. (A copy of repairs required is attached to the letter) • If the owner fails to comply within the allotted time, the case is forwarded to the Building Standards Board. The Building Standards Board is an established board created by ordinance. The Building Standards Board, through a public hearing process can: • Order the property owner found to be in violation to make the necessary repairs. or • In some cases, order the property be demolished based on an assessment survey performed by a Property Advisor. If the property owner fails to comply with the Building Standards Board's order, the City can take any one of the following actions: • The City can demolish and incur the cost of the demolition and the removal of the debris. A lien will then be filed and expenses may or may not be collected at a future date. or • The City can file Municipal Court property owner. charges in against the FUNDING • The City provides the following funding for Board Up/Demolition: • General Fund $120,000 (includes mowing property throughout the City) • Crime Control District (board up only) $17,000 Weed & Seed Grant $25,000 (Board up of property only in CDBG eligible areas of the City) • Community Development Block Grant $215,700 (Board -up and Demolition in CDBG eligible areas of the City) TOTAL: $ 377,700 OTHER ASSISTANCE The Program Guard Neighborhood Visions and the US National annually remove substandard structures where criminal activity has been reported. The only expense incurred by the City is the Inspection. cost of Asbestos • The annual program is known as "Operation Clean Sweep," where approximately 22 homes were demolished during the recent campaign. CONCLUSION While we recognize the process described in this presentation works, additional funding is necessary. During the 2003-2004 Budget process, we would like to discuss different alternatives to increase funding for this program. 9.5. IL BSS k 7 C7 cCity of orpus Christi