HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 11/05/2002 (S)AGENDA
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1201 LEOPARD
NOVEMBER 5, 2002
12:00 P.M.
A. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. to call the meeting to order.
B. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers.
Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Javier D. Colmenero
Council Members:
Brent Chesney
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Manager David R. Garcia
City Attorney James R. Bray, Jr.__
City Secretary Armando Chapa __
C. SPECIAL ACTION ITEM:
Motion approving the recommended ranking of contractors for the Multi-Purpose Arena and
authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter negotiations in accordance with the Local
Government Code.
ADJOURNMENT:
POSTING STATEMENT:
This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board at the front entrance to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street,
at 5:30 p.m., November1 ,2002.
Arrnando Chapa
City Secretary
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 5, 2002
SUBJECT: Recommend Contractor Ranking - Multi-purpose Arena (4236)
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion approving the recommended ranking of contractors for the Multi-Purpose Arena and
authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter negotiations in accordance with the
Local Government Code.
FUNDING: Funds are not committed by the motion.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented.
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Additional Information
H:\HOME\KEVINS\GEN~ARENA~AEAM D 1MEMO.DOC
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Recommend Contractor Ranking - Multi-purpose Arena (4236)
BACKGROUND: The Major Projects Committee recommended the use of Competitive
Sealed Proposals for the Arena as an alternative delivery method. Council authorized staff
to proceed with competitive sealed proposals for the Arena on March 26, 2002. Proposals
were opened Monday, October 21, 2002.
Competitive sealed proposals allows the consideration of factors in addition to cost in
determining which proposal represents the best value for the City. The published
evaluation and ranking criteria included:
· Cost;
· Organization, demonstrated ability, claims/lawsuits history and financial resoumes to
perform the work;
· Qualifications and experience of the project team assigned to manage the project;
· Demonstrated experience in construction of projects of similar size and complexity;
· Past performance on other construction contracts for the City of Corpus Christi and/or
projects of similar size and complexity for other institutions or municipalities of similar
size in the Corpus Christi area;
· Demonstrated ability to suitably schedule the project and examples of how schedules
were met on other projects of similar size and complexity;
· Safety record supported by accurate and verifiable data;
· Methodologies for quality assurance program;
· Ability to start construction in a timely manner; and
· Local and minority participation plan in terms of adequacy and probable level of
success (scoring based on local particiPation).
PROPOSALS:
received from:
Five proposals were ope.ned on October 21, 2002.
Fulton/Coastcon, Joint Venture;
Lyda/Arana Durden, Joint Venture;
Satterfield & Pointikes;
Zachry Construction; and
Spaw Glass/Braselton Joint Venture
Responses were
PROPOSAL EVALUATION: The City's technical committee intensively reviewed the
proposals. The technical committee was composed of Gilbane Building Company,
Anderson Group Construction Management and the Assistant Director of Engineering
Services. Results of the review was then Presented to the City's Evaluation Committee.
J EXHIBIT "A" ]
H:\HOM E\KEVINS\G EN'~rena~AuthNegotiation 1 bkgExhA.doc